[{"id": 12420, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_84BC11A52344FBDD0B18B87F0D8C6074BE70B98E90EC3E87BC15865716A226E6|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_84BC11A52344FBDD0B18B87F0D8C6074BE70B98E90EC3E87BC15865716A226E6|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f5ddb3aa59effd47", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_84BC11A52344FBDD0B18B87F0D8C6074BE70B98E90EC3E87BC15865716A226E6", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "Upland Unified School District", "title": "Upland Unified School District \u2014 School Bonds", "description": "School Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "55%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/UplandUSD/FT_UplandUSD.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:15.989832", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.123864", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.123864", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Upland Unified School District \u2014 School Bonds", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "School Bonds", "local_measure_type_short": "Bond", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "GO Bond", "total": 87, "passed": 60, "pass_rate": 69, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/UplandUSD/FT_UplandUSD.pdf", "sha256": "00558fe8b40d575681c9332ae7efd03cf75df1f132acd94c142a6a1815462e5e", "size_bytes": 152626, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/UplandUSD/IA_UplandUSD.pdf", "sha256": "a0b43037d072f4e9102973df691dc2ea293b3bd0f27922a0b335b9af4daef1d7", "size_bytes": 318663, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/UplandUSD/TR_UplandUSD.pdf", "sha256": "c71ee98eb8aeb7e5406c77bf68784c45678edef4c7fa43506065954db85b6a73", "size_bytes": 117162, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["tax_rate_statement"], "labels": ["Tax rate statement"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/UplandUSD/AIF_UplandUSD.pdf", "sha256": "fb16cf9cde8d4f0a6d5e8964437e3c8ed7d76526e5be136a641530a4cadc1847", "size_bytes": 491546, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/UplandUSD/AA_UplandUSD.pdf", "sha256": "6a4513e8a4c26989c3b601fdd14ed86392fae77fdf793b394ae60314913389d8", "size_bytes": 55689, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/UplandUSD/RAF_UplandUSD.pdf", "sha256": "e9b027a37791d6529759f252df665c71e6ae15833e6429fafdc84f9d8038a339", "size_bytes": 81238, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/UplandUSD/RAA_UplandUSD.pdf", "sha256": "5c1195a206242fae306783fdcf67182ccf945858798b2628b20fb506fe9f22ec", "size_bytes": 181057, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/UplandUSD/RES_UplandUSD.pdf", "sha256": "514b41e94c0edef649eb408f2abfc7a48169c064fbc60ceebaa666c9208aa491", "size_bytes": 208975, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/UplandUSD/Notice_UUSD.pdf", "sha256": "430ba7a95a7a673df640d393a3f48108216105339a717f4f04f2d2e5626abf63", "size_bytes": 161625, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["notice"], "labels": ["Notice of election"]}]}, {"id": 12421, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_2745C49FBC8F4E0D450F3B9A9E3CA78FB01B21544F72CB6FD383327774ABA364|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_2745C49FBC8F4E0D450F3B9A9E3CA78FB01B21544F72CB6FD383327774ABA364|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a4207f13cf0054ef", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_2745C49FBC8F4E0D450F3B9A9E3CA78FB01B21544F72CB6FD383327774ABA364", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "Beaumont Unified School District", "title": "Beaumont Unified School District \u2014 School Bonds", "description": "School Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "55%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BeaumontUSD/FT_BUSD.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.010547", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.123999", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.123999", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Beaumont Unified School District \u2014 School Bonds", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "School Bonds", "local_measure_type_short": "Bond", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "GO Bond", "total": 87, "passed": 60, "pass_rate": 69, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BeaumontUSD/FT_BUSD.pdf", "sha256": "e19df487e4519ec896a4b6aa70ab264b52f66594d9986e2f69f4b77a4eeb7cd4", "size_bytes": 135462, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BeaumontUSD/IA_BUSD.pdf", "sha256": "5f6c0085f8da65d1a2ec277ec2f1310be0c5201417646ba4aa8667ccd582d54f", "size_bytes": 147375, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BeaumontUSD/TR_BUSD.pdf", "sha256": "16d9cbc9abed90ac5e1336d183697527cf2d03b6cb0c7bd74306c6412548c019", "size_bytes": 118883, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["tax_rate_statement"], "labels": ["Tax rate statement"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BeaumontUSD/AF_BUSD.pdf", "sha256": "a6417ce39ec7ea4e59fdac9f84817af43724e19764d7027922ef8a0187922999", "size_bytes": 411973, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BeaumontUSD/RES_BUSD.pdf", "sha256": "0fd0a45cf4e13590eb18cc9f783a1cb3aa3f88bf498420a252b958e61b48c4ae", "size_bytes": 146076, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12422, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_1B99CBE9214817F33F9593A620787A0A15F13254804BF41EE7B7FACB334907B2|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_1B99CBE9214817F33F9593A620787A0A15F13254804BF41EE7B7FACB334907B2|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "779681725aec85ae", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_1B99CBE9214817F33F9593A620787A0A15F13254804BF41EE7B7FACB334907B2", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "Barstow Community College District", "title": "Barstow Community College District \u2014 School Bonds", "description": "School Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "55%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BarstowCCD/FT_BarstowCCD.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.030311", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.124122", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.124122", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Barstow Community College District \u2014 School Bonds", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "School Bonds", "local_measure_type_short": "Bond", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "GO Bond", "total": 87, "passed": 60, "pass_rate": 69, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BarstowCCD/FT_BarstowCCD.pdf", "sha256": "0127a4469d83675f6a20c2de1b95a5b8bca91532cede9dc1ae8a6989a7ecc508", "size_bytes": 223798, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BarstowCCD/IA_BarstowCCD.pdf", "sha256": "62c5024756fb98a218647442b870647fb5ac86f15d074b9d22a6acff3aa264f4", "size_bytes": 768378, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BarstowCCD/TR_BarstowCCD.pdf", "sha256": "ed041f0615481b580f1f1b193733565c42ef47beb1c9a26f215d22b8baa3d1a3", "size_bytes": 78463, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["tax_rate_statement"], "labels": ["Tax rate statement"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BarstowCCD/AF_BarstowCCD.pdf", "sha256": "c5df780c4c635a84670d532571cb4188447566285d5e5b6170fd42dafbd837ee", "size_bytes": 176551, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BarstowCCD/RES_BarstowCCD.pdf", "sha256": "ce93075ca048c14aef2a7b3b34c98c03724d89d47a3e214f7311c1ef0eb10624", "size_bytes": 204543, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/BarstowCCD/Notice_BCCD.pdf", "sha256": "5537d9f7443b9fafc844f973357e3842599b2ce6c989f55f8a521178c51e7f2a", "size_bytes": 150512, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["notice"], "labels": ["Notice of election"]}]}, {"id": 12424, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_4F39DB70B0A444386B799ABF4A4C4A24821A090538CD7089D839F5B3FFC81B2F|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_4F39DB70B0A444386B799ABF4A4C4A24821A090538CD7089D839F5B3FFC81B2F|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "23af09639e487d83", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_4F39DB70B0A444386B799ABF4A4C4A24821A090538CD7089D839F5B3FFC81B2F", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Needles", "title": "City of Needles \u2014 Charter Amendment", "description": "Charter Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/29/FT_CityofNeedles.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.069751", "updated_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.069751", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.069751", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Needles \u2014 Charter Amendment", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Charter Amendment", "local_measure_type_short": "Charter Amendment", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Charter Amendment", "total": 38, "passed": 28, "pass_rate": 74, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/29/FT_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "cbb360c92f3e2d008a98106a7bfcc8ea82761cac1663a3c24e15d4d0a36150e4", "size_bytes": 152915, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/29/IA_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "47271d89ff3d6a522d0e01f9f24c1802a0f96088b01b33e237c724b072dbdd5a", "size_bytes": 98007, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/29/AIF_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "e0bacbe48bcf34c6b3881647d58a8b36e912b3203776618105a4b5904ecde6d8", "size_bytes": 84836, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/29/RES_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "d8add9a76f7a19dd6735c7b730c0c64202cc9bc7741ed0b20416c4593581b103", "size_bytes": 158737, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12425, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_7A18A976EC35C1AC9CF025206D37E2E7A918D4D0650DB56D9874D331DC5BE5CD|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_7A18A976EC35C1AC9CF025206D37E2E7A918D4D0650DB56D9874D331DC5BE5CD|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "00372fec5cec5639", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_7A18A976EC35C1AC9CF025206D37E2E7A918D4D0650DB56D9874D331DC5BE5CD", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Highland", "title": "City of Highland \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "description": "Transactions and Use Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofHighland/FT_CityofHighland.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.091022", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.124531", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.124531", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Highland \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Transactions and Use Tax", "local_measure_type_short": "Sales tax", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Sales Tax", "total": 30, "passed": 17, "pass_rate": 57, "since": 2004, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofHighland/FT_CityofHighland.pdf", "sha256": "5b9dc6b5bb0897363fb583f78055dbf8dbc01c197de1258bf27f0b4c43c8c6ba", "size_bytes": 136661, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofHighland/IA_CityofHighland.pdf", "sha256": "688041e77ae02f9d46fadad96f829ecc97aced8de191d8094d6a76e396749b79", "size_bytes": 104673, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofHighland/AIF_CityofHighland.pdf", "sha256": "e8bb8acff76d4338da414ca427144d184c148750de5ac21f51f065a5af7638c2", "size_bytes": 115569, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofHighland/RES_CityofHighland.pdf", "sha256": "43a0ef7d5f38fa5e5eb551d86949ff0fb2f36fb3f1398ccf8ada6f881433a631", "size_bytes": 118573, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12426, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_9FFFA1EF6F185189134BCC2E3950F9AC096B1092FAE34B0FA384DFE61C17707A|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_9FFFA1EF6F185189134BCC2E3950F9AC096B1092FAE34B0FA384DFE61C17707A|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "86ec0689c063ab01", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_9FFFA1EF6F185189134BCC2E3950F9AC096B1092FAE34B0FA384DFE61C17707A", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Chino", "title": "City of Chino \u2014 Municipal Code Amendment", "description": "Municipal Code Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChino/FT_CityofChino.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.111375", "updated_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.111375", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.111375", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Chino \u2014 Municipal Code Amendment", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Municipal Code Amendment", "local_measure_type_short": "Municipal code", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Ordinance", "total": 70, "passed": 40, "pass_rate": 57, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChino/FT_CityofChino.pdf", "sha256": "e16567940df9c120240a4cc5f6baa788bb27f84612247614c068a95d8a2e15d1", "size_bytes": 261559, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChino/IA_CityofChino.pdf", "sha256": "4e178d9ca921e321971985bed37db121c51352b254002a25bdfab8b54f89be64", "size_bytes": 148984, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChino/AIF_CityofChino.pdf", "sha256": "68ab237cf975b440c39e71a30796f171b25ac86d2221ca4878fa3d91b1510cfc", "size_bytes": 104030, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChino/RES_CityofChino.pdf", "sha256": "8ccd6fea22df9e2b6d4ec05eba5b043a3af4ec1f0d4f4fbde835037cf68ba1fa", "size_bytes": 312463, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12427, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_8F4D625C447325143F8CC6566C4DB9D5948D6EBE4E17D08134660B53FFB6254C|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_8F4D625C447325143F8CC6566C4DB9D5948D6EBE4E17D08134660B53FFB6254C|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3bd6a1b0cfc26c77", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_8F4D625C447325143F8CC6566C4DB9D5948D6EBE4E17D08134660B53FFB6254C", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Twentynine Palms", "title": "City of Twentynine Palms \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "description": "Transactions and Use Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofTwentyninePalms/FT_TP.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.132764", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.124963", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.124963", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Twentynine Palms \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Transactions and Use Tax", "local_measure_type_short": "Sales tax", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Sales Tax", "total": 30, "passed": 17, "pass_rate": 57, "since": 2004, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofTwentyninePalms/FT_TP.pdf", "sha256": "17ac59811d3e6ba185ed11cf485a8caf4beeb33228c1d56c8520948f72f10b3d", "size_bytes": 186243, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofTwentyninePalms/IA_TP.pdf", "sha256": "cf05bb695c5b3e529c08ff96d4cb46933b5a45ecf654e7636933b202270f6283", "size_bytes": 122297, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofTwentyninePalms/AIF_TP.pdf", "sha256": "450b10ebd46c068017ea9656b078e944c574ef7ccca4697f00c6b187fa44459b", "size_bytes": 113044, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofTwentyninePalms/RES_TP.pdf", "sha256": "0ad40564b50f2cf7fe7e1a9e4266a4d0ec40bb81f5bb6c7baa967fc9f809e111", "size_bytes": 130226, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12428, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_8431F6224547FB5BCCD5564006838480E39A6E6458F1757C6122D97508256673|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_8431F6224547FB5BCCD5564006838480E39A6E6458F1757C6122D97508256673|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "566de6e320991da0", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_8431F6224547FB5BCCD5564006838480E39A6E6458F1757C6122D97508256673", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Ontario", "title": "City of Ontario \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "description": "Transactions and Use Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofOntario/FT_Ontario.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.153465", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.125289", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.125289", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Ontario \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Transactions and Use Tax", "local_measure_type_short": "Sales tax", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Sales Tax", "total": 30, "passed": 17, "pass_rate": 57, "since": 2004, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofOntario/FT_Ontario.pdf", "sha256": "bafc0e5f2066f37fe8d069748703494dfcf18f03c57c5e42f82f05c5613cee38", "size_bytes": 106002, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofOntario/IA_Ontario.pdf", "sha256": "53f3b7d679211fdf33e9d045bdc9cd0f77c580b5f181ea3c46a23b6c4e4aae30", "size_bytes": 103046, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofOntario/AIF_Ontario.pdf", "sha256": "4215c3510dca32487c475d9ee3a3e0f24aa109ff7217787b31600ad3fd934692", "size_bytes": 113642, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofOntario/AA_Ontario.pdf", "sha256": "e5bc2fb2597bcc105650486db46342afa6779ea7ec5b73c51245b4f20ce28c30", "size_bytes": 121448, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofOntario/RAF_Ontario.pdf", "sha256": "f4fd3f6120b1cf9b6cae935e9e866dad972229705f46e9ba3f9b2597667f7f52", "size_bytes": 78387, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofOntario/RAA_Ontario.pdf", "sha256": "426f6a78c7c76acdf80c2b8bd78b2d1bada1956cab12c768f945a4271b52eddf", "size_bytes": 355901, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofOntario/RES_Ontario.pdf", "sha256": "7970fee795d723df1b2cf71413d398a01fa93dba43aa89533e764959864e74ba", "size_bytes": 136644, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12423, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_CB99BB24E177D66591BD04A801F1183B4E7AD433F8A141B3C9723C12C1F5EF86|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_CB99BB24E177D66591BD04A801F1183B4E7AD433F8A141B3C9723C12C1F5EF86|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "7831d539a94e6761", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_CB99BB24E177D66591BD04A801F1183B4E7AD433F8A141B3C9723C12C1F5EF86", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "San Bernardino County Transportation Authority", "title": "San Bernardino County Transportation Authority \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "description": "Transactions and Use Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "66.67%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/County/FT_SBCTA.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.049890", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.124289", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.124289", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Bernardino County Transportation Authority \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Transactions and Use Tax", "local_measure_type_short": "Sales tax", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Sales Tax", "total": 30, "passed": 17, "pass_rate": 57, "since": 2004, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/County/FT_SBCTA.pdf", "sha256": "b3942a6d04bb9d2469f05fdc6290772978cfe4f6a4fce98e0f16cc4186adb85c", "size_bytes": 2010232, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/County/IA_SBCTA.pdf", "sha256": "8ab1287c34f603939b306bd629572697753062e9369eddf33092ad44e6d53904", "size_bytes": 686677, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/County/AF_SBCTA.pdf", "sha256": "c0edcf01be1990d68bbffed1ab1a7ea1bdc4476de984f6948589df7622bda6b1", "size_bytes": 127533, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/County/RES_SBCTA.pdf", "sha256": "f48ad830f7177eab3511f89cc3c0857eb0c32c0eefe94186869a9f03e7d9fc53", "size_bytes": 98736, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/County/Notice_SBCTA.pdf", "sha256": "95db92811a4f6fde33d9fbf81aff880979f3a04fb4676bf37cf1964e97bf0331", "size_bytes": 166775, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["notice"], "labels": ["Notice of election"]}]}, {"id": 12429, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_0FCA13705CBC5DA787D6B33C950CF83C2D4780532FE0CBD46196BA6856643AAD|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_0FCA13705CBC5DA787D6B33C950CF83C2D4780532FE0CBD46196BA6856643AAD|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1cc5f8c82605c8e7", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_0FCA13705CBC5DA787D6B33C950CF83C2D4780532FE0CBD46196BA6856643AAD", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Chino Hills", "title": "City of Chino Hills \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "description": "Transactions and Use Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChinoHills/FT_ChinoHills.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.173278", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.125463", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.125463", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Chino Hills \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Transactions and Use Tax", "local_measure_type_short": "Sales tax", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Sales Tax", "total": 30, "passed": 17, "pass_rate": 57, "since": 2004, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChinoHills/FT_ChinoHills.pdf", "sha256": "3a5207dfd6e03d080423de2c8ae7d14aaaaae07bed44ee5b699bbd7c4f25a7ef", "size_bytes": 166207, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChinoHills/IA_ChinoHills.pdf", "sha256": "d9a86dae6448d33af9611b354224a5acab300e939c0eed861cb1c527e25a0a92", "size_bytes": 97480, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChinoHills/AF_ChinoHills.pdf", "sha256": "caceefe9cf072c7be96a2781df830f55c296c805eddbbb414cf0a85b71fe1da3", "size_bytes": 54759, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChinoHills/AA_ChinoHills.pdf", "sha256": "bcd9636872696c6599d52cfb45f48cbe33e022e8eb0aa09b190eb930156a90c5", "size_bytes": 50833, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChinoHills/RAF_ChinoHills.pdf", "sha256": "7f0e27e2ffa8dcf4cd4761611c13bd9f859297909a799f606afa03401ee4fda3", "size_bytes": 329169, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChinoHills/RAA_ChinoHills.pdf", "sha256": "1b0e116770ed7aa2ab61dfdf02c7bcc35963908df9a30708ef049973025a2146", "size_bytes": 50019, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofChinoHills/RES_ChinoHills.pdf", "sha256": "4b15853f6c2e195e46333a9faa452817f13ed2496e67a8a21e92ab4b785f7877", "size_bytes": 152171, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12430, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_8901CFD5842D23C6537838E62C0D1D09BCB132DB8CE19C1C5E97B8C94B23A2FD|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_8901CFD5842D23C6537838E62C0D1D09BCB132DB8CE19C1C5E97B8C94B23A2FD|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3efd7bc8b955cd89", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_8901CFD5842D23C6537838E62C0D1D09BCB132DB8CE19C1C5E97B8C94B23A2FD", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Needles", "title": "City of Needles \u2014 Transient Occupancy Tax", "description": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/27/FT_CityofNeedles.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.194868", "updated_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.194868", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.194868", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Needles \u2014 Transient Occupancy Tax", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "local_measure_type_short": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "total": 16, "passed": 12, "pass_rate": 75, "since": 2002, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/27/FT_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "013093c1d4baf71949443a7543136dd56dc2e26bd6933268b088b0002a810919", "size_bytes": 229567, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/27/IA_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "17229e2621592ebf3c14bacaf6c35817ef3f1217ad187253e45a17555544bef2", "size_bytes": 104876, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/27/AIF_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "f8316fd7167d2a9abc27a24c38a6f8815eebceaf05502de9c08c85096d5ade58", "size_bytes": 81803, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/27/RES_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "18a2dbbf59022db2832c689d6e23467aaed82b8f71b5da10d107b2afb2f9d3a5", "size_bytes": 147348, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12431, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_973A2809DB723F30E501E63BF54BA0509D16621BE09359AF490A514284B55F63|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_973A2809DB723F30E501E63BF54BA0509D16621BE09359AF490A514284B55F63|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "45ca302e992c55b0", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_973A2809DB723F30E501E63BF54BA0509D16621BE09359AF490A514284B55F63", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Needles", "title": "City of Needles \u2014 Municipal Bonds", "description": "Municipal Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "66.67%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/30/FT_CityofNeedles.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.215895", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.125786", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.125786", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Needles \u2014 Municipal Bonds", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Municipal Bonds", "local_measure_type_short": "Bond", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "GO Bond", "total": 87, "passed": 60, "pass_rate": 69, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/30/FT_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "986dbfbc08bd1ba0779cd307a579c0df009decccb2c28058837b03c3ed3ef864", "size_bytes": 142647, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/30/IA_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "899dc81c478cc2ae3cd49b56e14e42685e52d04c9304f02e0121280be8c7904e", "size_bytes": 114771, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/30/TR_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "d52120c0060353e5184d43b48b0e33877a3d1a5a9d9c13a3b1447cdb21d8d23d", "size_bytes": 194720, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["tax_rate_statement"], "labels": ["Tax rate statement"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/30/AIF_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "6687e731407e9940f0fbbce4dec4a0d18152929fb80168e87e8264ea19cfdcd8", "size_bytes": 78832, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofNeedles/30/RES_CityofNeedles.pdf", "sha256": "b99009b35552dbeccb78634d5cc5ff4fb15134fae665d7b46eee546cc14862c9", "size_bytes": 123730, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12432, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_F46A77DE47996F3E4CE46EA5588A8D33812E749CA9BB3FEA6E5A6903894A07E5|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_F46A77DE47996F3E4CE46EA5588A8D33812E749CA9BB3FEA6E5A6903894A07E5|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "7c6dd34d078eb983", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_F46A77DE47996F3E4CE46EA5588A8D33812E749CA9BB3FEA6E5A6903894A07E5", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Upland", "title": "City of Upland \u2014 Municipal Code Amendment", "description": "Municipal Code Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofUpland/FT_Upland.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.236748", "updated_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.236748", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.236748", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Upland \u2014 Municipal Code Amendment", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Municipal Code Amendment", "local_measure_type_short": "Municipal code", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Ordinance", "total": 70, "passed": 40, "pass_rate": 57, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofUpland/FT_Upland.pdf", "sha256": "9bf9153c6cfed5f2872ac7520c1711deaf72320025172b8e4bd097550a38e166", "size_bytes": 1205980, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofUpland/IA_Upland.pdf", "sha256": "6d590a9bd1974e69fd93134a0e37f8dd558afff54323c736dd19f7698b11b80d", "size_bytes": 133953, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofUpland/AF_Upland.pdf", "sha256": "d592686e88c6559577cb91c07b6778bc64b5f9cad3976fe4f3405ddc4f8503b6", "size_bytes": 114939, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofUpland/AA_Upland.pdf", "sha256": "e11b205f51a9bcc31364d0c45e5b5ffa052537ee56b70aa18cd23dafd4d9bb55", "size_bytes": 53473, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofUpland/RAF_Upland.pdf", "sha256": "43a88cd79ecdc4fe8042ca125278adc20431dcf2d40ca3cf8189e6f23efbe330", "size_bytes": 83042, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofUpland/RAA_Upland.pdf", "sha256": "63c8bedddd134c9b65a43c35121546c121c2544c7f8c4473f006b73a93093e9f", "size_bytes": 83041, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofUpland/RES_Upland.pdf", "sha256": "c66d9160ccf35a3dea50546b06709ede97d5fbe5a06080edc474e22bdea6973e", "size_bytes": 195757, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12433, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_4366C0EC75DFBF837D22FFA95C0AFADCD02EEA6FC656B62FE469892BB2A84EE6|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_4366C0EC75DFBF837D22FFA95C0AFADCD02EEA6FC656B62FE469892BB2A84EE6|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "19cc7f208db58bd2", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_4366C0EC75DFBF837D22FFA95C0AFADCD02EEA6FC656B62FE469892BB2A84EE6", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Grand Terrace", "title": "City of Grand Terrace \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "description": "Transactions and Use Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofGrandTerrace/FT_GT.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.257220", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.125950", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.125950", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Grand Terrace \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Transactions and Use Tax", "local_measure_type_short": "Sales tax", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Sales Tax", "total": 30, "passed": 17, "pass_rate": 57, "since": 2004, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofGrandTerrace/FT_GT.pdf", "sha256": "c12354b86745aefb42f72eeb7f79567a4971a88d1f1460f91958b59bab3d3b5e", "size_bytes": 174740, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofGrandTerrace/IA_GT.pdf", "sha256": "74b460d3b4b7447cdf1e5835618e322348b7e5675c4c170a3911b8c651b01c36", "size_bytes": 131359, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofGrandTerrace/RES_GT.pdf", "sha256": "31c055fc7e0f94615be383930d0568cd170574b34e4b67030e1f928fd2f52ca4", "size_bytes": 124922, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12434, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_FD3D94F35EA219EB990B2FF37FD228DECE5FEC5CE27D5B5A7F096FF97B4F07D4|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_FD3D94F35EA219EB990B2FF37FD228DECE5FEC5CE27D5B5A7F096FF97B4F07D4|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b15b37328d114c53", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_FD3D94F35EA219EB990B2FF37FD228DECE5FEC5CE27D5B5A7F096FF97B4F07D4", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Colton", "title": "City of Colton \u2014 Municipal Code Amendment", "description": "Municipal Code Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofColton/FT_CityofColton.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.277253", "updated_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.277253", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.277253", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Colton \u2014 Municipal Code Amendment", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Municipal Code Amendment", "local_measure_type_short": "Municipal code", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Ordinance", "total": 70, "passed": 40, "pass_rate": 57, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofColton/FT_CityofColton.pdf", "sha256": "ebcd6cddbcffb12e94313999711b2da53f34e8ede488c1df154a521a85d8e170", "size_bytes": 140399, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofColton/IA_CityofColton.pdf", "sha256": "d60a41911e854a9a3c50880a848eb407a69e382b771a0badc7577053a60d6e06", "size_bytes": 101128, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofColton/AIF_CityofColton.pdf", "sha256": "7444027b6cdf8df17c99edd65523f2aa845322355e0471ddf18a5e35bb2dc3e3", "size_bytes": 143503, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofColton/RES_CityofColton.pdf", "sha256": "7e57ce2afb505113ab7513ab82759852d63a2b4210f5e02b5bdc803baecd94a7", "size_bytes": 174470, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12435, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_E8F62442FE7A43F82AE0ED3638CCDF77F4131E60956D0AF3ACDF400A82463CE7|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_E8F62442FE7A43F82AE0ED3638CCDF77F4131E60956D0AF3ACDF400A82463CE7|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "49005accd71c3efe", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_E8F62442FE7A43F82AE0ED3638CCDF77F4131E60956D0AF3ACDF400A82463CE7", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "City of Adelanto", "title": "City of Adelanto \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "description": "Transactions and Use Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofAdelanto/FT_CityofAdelanto.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.297178", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.126188", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.126188", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Adelanto \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Transactions and Use Tax", "local_measure_type_short": "Sales tax", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Sales Tax", "total": 30, "passed": 17, "pass_rate": 57, "since": 2004, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofAdelanto/FT_CityofAdelanto.pdf", "sha256": "82993a6d0840614c5dea52bae69489f3e317809c2abb9c3bb950cfb68e16df3b", "size_bytes": 137583, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofAdelanto/IA_CityofAdelanto.pdf", "sha256": "ae108d0c9af99750309a3b3d63918233895302cc8cbb90bb036215bf3128e356", "size_bytes": 82647, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofAdelanto/AIF_CityofAdelanto.pdf", "sha256": "331b299fbf1b3b143b94d7a8b7c21e9c0e9b3467010953bac2a3adbf397cdc15", "size_bytes": 146744, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/CityofAdelanto/RES_CityofAdelanto.pdf", "sha256": "965dddaab6b22dd6c35235a306f2e8b22862c7846373f7e10463758b7f0c5d7a", "size_bytes": 166565, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12436, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_D0B5180285B7F2AB73DE80AA3B57B50DE4FD7D4286D7DD57E80D3EC5093EB54C|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_D0B5180285B7F2AB73DE80AA3B57B50DE4FD7D4286D7DD57E80D3EC5093EB54C|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "461afc2dac99a8f0", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_D0B5180285B7F2AB73DE80AA3B57B50DE4FD7D4286D7DD57E80D3EC5093EB54C", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "San Bernardino Mountains Community Hospital District", "title": "San Bernardino Mountains Community Hospital District \u2014 District Bonds", "description": "District Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "66.67%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBMCHD/FT_SBMCHD.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.317457", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.126424", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.126424", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Bernardino Mountains Community Hospital District \u2014 District Bonds", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "District Bonds", "local_measure_type_short": "Bond", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "GO Bond", "total": 87, "passed": 60, "pass_rate": 69, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBMCHD/FT_SBMCHD.pdf", "sha256": "e2acc72f5de0bc553e00efd7d0425669b371bb494f252f5f796864b7a80b0fd1", "size_bytes": 143983, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBMCHD/IA_SBMCHD.pdf", "sha256": "c2c8592c6c96cc6f6a56b4d8d8be78f6fa5fe443861eb2af1039c90f66086835", "size_bytes": 641249, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBMCHD/TR_SBMCHD.pdf", "sha256": "47794242cbec857b26d1cb8f4d444e4381e33e079fe0f0c2babf7224525eebd1", "size_bytes": 103598, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["tax_rate_statement"], "labels": ["Tax rate statement"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBMCHD/AIF_SBMCHD.pdf", "sha256": "09484f4d710cd63eaff81ca74cbcabd9a60561f37db7f845e4dfaca986f679ba", "size_bytes": 540195, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBMCHD/RES_SBMCHD.pdf", "sha256": "846c739527fb852d7ac0fb6aaefb45586f207304123e2b443a4920788b7d113b", "size_bytes": 189732, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBMCHD/Notice_SBMCHD.pdf", "sha256": "6296d3e0b68cae8b5af33f23084cdac1420ec43792095cf512bf7f3342a7cc0d", "size_bytes": 157468, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["notice"], "labels": ["Notice of election"]}]}, {"id": 12437, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_1AABFD000352B25F52F7C32B247C199E3E3BE86A159DFD1AEFA21DF1A0636E92|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_1AABFD000352B25F52F7C32B247C199E3E3BE86A159DFD1AEFA21DF1A0636E92|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "460aa5ff469a31a4", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_1AABFD000352B25F52F7C32B247C199E3E3BE86A159DFD1AEFA21DF1A0636E92", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "Rim of the World Recreation and Park District", "title": "Rim of the World Recreation and Park District \u2014 Special Parcel Tax", "description": "Special Parcel Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "66.67%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/RimoftheWorldRPD/FT_ROTW.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:16.337082", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.126578", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.126578", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Rim of the World Recreation and Park District \u2014 Special Parcel Tax", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "Special Parcel Tax", "local_measure_type_short": "Parcel tax", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Property Tax", "total": 15, "passed": 3, "pass_rate": 20, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/RimoftheWorldRPD/FT_ROTW.pdf", "sha256": "2a4c14ae4965f55694d1b622dabd8d4ae905b81c2574dc5a1715e4bc672ed19f", "size_bytes": 1724467, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/RimoftheWorldRPD/IA_ROTW.pdf", "sha256": "8eef2531d45d736a3e99eba4bcdb3eeb91c2de30a1e929f081fea4484cb937fe", "size_bytes": 126374, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/RimoftheWorldRPD/AF_ROTW.pdf", "sha256": "c1519ea05aa06b1eabce032e9a5ffed4af9f27354908805317d65248d06fe7ec", "size_bytes": 218612, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/RimoftheWorldRPD/RES_ROTW.pdf", "sha256": "036b8ec7ff6c34553211172d66231a1cf47baaa6a9c3447eaaa2d97b6d324815", "size_bytes": 234376, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/RimoftheWorldRPD/Notice_ROTW.pdf", "sha256": "aeb5379265d41d6f2e347bfe568fa0b3f2a9fe745b3d4ae00b8422559f0dcda3", "size_bytes": 151072, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["notice"], "labels": ["Notice of election"]}]}, {"id": 12418, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_3896656C9F93312913EBA64FB4FCDD72E1B26592C9B0D2E961435E228770A6F9|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_3896656C9F93312913EBA64FB4FCDD72E1B26592C9B0D2E961435E228770A6F9|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "7310f48f732f2a6a", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_3896656C9F93312913EBA64FB4FCDD72E1B26592C9B0D2E961435E228770A6F9", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "San Bernardino Community College District", "title": "San Bernardino Community College District \u2014 School Bonds", "description": "School Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "55%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCCD/FT_SBCCD.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:15.942439", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.123137", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.123137", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Bernardino Community College District \u2014 School Bonds", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "School Bonds", "local_measure_type_short": "Bond", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "GO Bond", "total": 87, "passed": 60, "pass_rate": 69, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCCD/FT_SBCCD.pdf", "sha256": "ea4420a2f7563a4bac6fb0a609639633c7fe89864d03aeabc78016e95ddc7d8b", "size_bytes": 178459, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCCD/IA_SBCCD.pdf", "sha256": "a812b037f4f2102a076c9c3443ed6f9a328a8dbe8dd9744673ee9e8bdbbefad8", "size_bytes": 608691, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCCD/TR_SBCCD.pdf", "sha256": "1535d241cb7471ad849ef19ebd3c3d1446301c5f34da1109bc5262ec78d73ff4", "size_bytes": 111372, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["tax_rate_statement"], "labels": ["Tax rate statement"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCCD/AIF_SBCCD.pdf", "sha256": "91f499226ad5622c80385bedfca450354231e19ee248fa7ef6fbaf9f13daad38", "size_bytes": 192842, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCCD/RES_SBCCD.pdf", "sha256": "243cf92dec698091a4595c3fdc0abf657037b277e5f2377bde479db8c5d1176a", "size_bytes": 165622, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCCD/Notice_SBCCD.pdf", "sha256": "7e4d8ed6ab4233ac91611e96044d162f8e8266313ff0a6a1924d0e3566c51406", "size_bytes": 166542, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["notice"], "labels": ["Notice of election"]}]}, {"id": 12419, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_0F4AE3608E58E60775B01EED06BAA9659D2A487D55CAFFA123047291245E82F5|SAN BERNARDINO|SB_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SB_20261103_0F4AE3608E58E60775B01EED06BAA9659D2A487D55CAFFA123047291245E82F5|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "55adf4f232f7a509", "measure_id": "REG_SB_20261103_0F4AE3608E58E60775B01EED06BAA9659D2A487D55CAFFA123047291245E82F5", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "San Bernardino City Unified School District", "title": "San Bernardino City Unified School District \u2014 School Bonds", "description": "School Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "55%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SB_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "pdf_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCityUSD/FT_SBCityUSD.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-27T19:10:15.967443", "updated_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.123647", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:08.123647", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Bernardino City Unified School District \u2014 School Bonds", "source": "SB_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Bernardino", "local_measure_type": "School Bonds", "local_measure_type_short": "Bond", "source_display": "San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "GO Bond", "total": 87, "passed": 60, "pass_rate": 69, "since": 1998, "county_label": "SB"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCityUSD/FT_SBCityUSD.pdf", "sha256": "4946128c494c9c6e96604e8d5b061f4124723f02280375907985f92f8cb6c48c", "size_bytes": 190435, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["text"], "labels": ["Full ballot text"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCityUSD/AIF_SBCUSD.pdf", "sha256": "297f20d5de893e76970be47c8f25f4cd66a69757ee5cea4fe762e8afa854631e", "size_bytes": 110164, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["analysis", "argument_for"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis", "Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCityUSD/TR_SBCityUSD.pdf", "sha256": "f799e0574257fe6fe010ec20bd6b0b74f34a632a6c5bd4995ba861e35958ac17", "size_bytes": 114429, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["tax_rate_statement"], "labels": ["Tax rate statement"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCityUSD/RES_SBCityUSD.pdf", "sha256": "afca8d7fba12f6c82846b1309ceaf470d59c2aa1d62afe285b87af81c05c3406", "size_bytes": 181908, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://uploads.rov.sbcounty.gov/ROV/Elections/2026/1103/Measures/SBCityUSD/Notice_SBCUSD.pdf", "sha256": "1bd66fc0bfde80543b6a42719f76248ea4d7559f3b7160882706bd8aa70f4d34", "size_bytes": 160036, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:28:58.884853+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://elections.sbcounty.gov/elections/2026/1103/measures/", "roles": ["notice"], "labels": ["Notice of election"]}]}, {"id": 12442, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_48D51587957DBFE6F0C1288C06DA8DB91E8DF77B49CF3164F998CC52C74599F7|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_48D51587957DBFE6F0C1288C06DA8DB91E8DF77B49CF3164F998CC52C74599F7|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "15cae573e77fa573", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_48D51587957DBFE6F0C1288C06DA8DB91E8DF77B49CF3164F998CC52C74599F7", "measure_letter": "", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "Public Transit Revenue Measure District", "title": "Public Transit Revenue Measure District \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "description": "Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M206-Contest%20Code-Reso-Public%20Transit%20District%20Sales%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.538159", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.538159", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.538159", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Public Transit Revenue Measure District \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Sales tax", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Sales Tax", "total": 26, "passed": 18, "pass_rate": 69, "since": 2004, "county_label": "San Mateo"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M206-Contest%20Code-Reso-Public%20Transit%20District%20Sales%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "343dbfda30034769a5ca0f3db2b31281fb17cbe5ea2737c0e470e0e7b7b4347d", "size_bytes": 2282041, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M206-ImpartialAnalysis-Public-Transit-District-Sales-Tax.pdf", "sha256": "88da1639b2d0cee37228184d0190eb6f277afa6456a53c2078d914bc25b0d031", "size_bytes": 118974, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M206-Contest%20Code-4ArginFavor-Public%20Transit%20District%20Sales%20Tax_Redacted_0.pdf", "sha256": "d608179afc2d502a33be824e70fdc550fc8d6bfcf3baf441375f65f14ed60288", "size_bytes": 1020644, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M206-Contest%20Code-46ArgAgainst-Public%20Transit%20District%20Sales%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "f7b9633802547be0f7fb140da094e9af653b96e5b47ad2ea26098dbab35d53d2", "size_bytes": 1001718, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M206-Contest%20Code-RebutArgInFav-Public-Transit-District-Sales-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "8b39424472a94d01b416287ffa3174e570f0a162c047dddf240bd9910d401fea", "size_bytes": 8113937, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M206-Contest%20Code-6RebutArgAgainst-Public-Transit-District-Sales-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "bfa4f556ea75c776a5a32362987289f76f215947b5d3a90121de147aab9277fa", "size_bytes": 1433812, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12439, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_4280B763B9CD95F20E6C33D52145D26CD81E2CF975831446697C0844395DC680|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_4280B763B9CD95F20E6C33D52145D26CD81E2CF975831446697C0844395DC680|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "448380b5f985df85", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_4280B763B9CD95F20E6C33D52145D26CD81E2CF975831446697C0844395DC680", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "San Mateo County", "title": "San Mateo County \u2014 Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Affirmation of Rights", "description": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Affirmation of Rights", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/San%20Mateo%20County%20Amendments.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.479303", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.479303", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.479303", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo County \u2014 Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Affirmation of Rights", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Affirmation of Rights", "local_measure_type_short": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Affirmation of Rights", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/San%20Mateo%20County%20Amendments.pdf", "sha256": "db9b218ebad34190631d655a933a558be422f90d367b4ad07c51ef85c59efae6", "size_bytes": 1315004, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MAA-ImpartialAnalysis-SMC-Charter-Affirmation-of-Rights.pdf", "sha256": "6b12116c6249c79e08208d3e6afc63266fd09a0084055d2cb21077707956a6eb", "size_bytes": 51591, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}]}, {"id": 12458, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_F5CAF385843050FF3DB1A6AF0F0790C6820D96E7DC967D667CEDECF5800EBB29|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_F5CAF385843050FF3DB1A6AF0F0790C6820D96E7DC967D667CEDECF5800EBB29|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8fae0e06ba55d907", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_F5CAF385843050FF3DB1A6AF0F0790C6820D96E7DC967D667CEDECF5800EBB29", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of Pacifica", "title": "City of Pacifica \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "description": "Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M402-Contest%20Code-Reso-Pacifica%20Transactions%20and%20Use%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.854975", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.854975", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.854975", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Pacifica \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Sales tax", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Sales Tax", "total": 26, "passed": 18, "pass_rate": 69, "since": 2004, "county_label": "San Mateo"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M402-Contest%20Code-Reso-Pacifica%20Transactions%20and%20Use%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "b1649da5de4e951043e388cbbf18c7b83130e6edff6914f999dc12c832a2f087", "size_bytes": 1296692, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MBB-ImpartialAnalysis-Pacifica-Transactions-and-Use-Tax.pdf", "sha256": "fe1796525870f17551fb57e48bc11b90f1089c5065f8b5dc752c5013dc5a4b41", "size_bytes": 89562, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MBB-ArgInFavor-Pacifica-Transactions-and-Use-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "625c20426b4c1b927c007c837ef1a39da42258f8c04b1d4517e6b9e3f7fd8929", "size_bytes": 10353820, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M402-Contest%20Code-7ArgAgainst-Pacifica%20Transactions%20and%20Use%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "3a9cafc35791dc6f13f74271a89d3dec0448504dd88063b3d5bb94aabea92a13", "size_bytes": 7095289, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MBB-RebutArgInFavor-Pacifica-Transactions-and-Use-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "ef527c00b01179b9478671fc0b646782b9d043c733cbb12eb834224235d2b6b3", "size_bytes": 17440042, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MBB-RebutArgAgainst-Pacifica-Transactions-and-Use-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "756ffe227f266494a07e0b0a6299d6ad1e3e6d3305e4967bb0508d9563f27c68", "size_bytes": 10064365, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12454, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_24B9D35647DA50291E77B63C8096D68E629068BD930A74E14B008F477D1E41E2|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_24B9D35647DA50291E77B63C8096D68E629068BD930A74E14B008F477D1E41E2|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c7cd521e0400a0c1", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_24B9D35647DA50291E77B63C8096D68E629068BD930A74E14B008F477D1E41E2", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of East Palo Alto", "title": "City of East Palo Alto \u2014 Term Limits Measure", "description": "Term Limits Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M207-Contest%20-Code-Reso-EPA%20Term%20Limits_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.776258", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.776258", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.776258", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of East Palo Alto \u2014 Term Limits Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Term Limits Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Term Limits Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M207-Contest%20-Code-Reso-EPA%20Term%20Limits_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "daef22a2faeadd173026c342f400b8257b7de61600b359bcc9eb97c75ac9af1a", "size_bytes": 1765100, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MCC-ImpartialAnalysis-EPA-Term-Limits_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "29a974ada7eccad8bfe937d1fe02c4d378891e8e7582a724325a41b0984624e4", "size_bytes": 106466, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M207-Contest%20-Code-5ArgInFavor-EPA%20Term%20Limits_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "d67f590d0e77806570a3b1512d8b248bd9c2825bc4a25538660cd832815571c3", "size_bytes": 153122, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M207-Contest%20-Code-7ArgAgainst-EPA%20Term%20Limits_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "4057243f4b472b66ec23b00955d12e7cd309480f3f75387635d1bcfbf695095f", "size_bytes": 694765, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MCC-RebutArgInFavor-EPA-Term-Limits_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "d54ead243515d0be5788bc1b000ad16a62ff6c394b0cb2a05200722eba5c90df", "size_bytes": 1358500, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}]}, {"id": 12452, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_118024B36F0781101BE6AABE91856EFAFED48B621203A4AF96D54E1A5EECCFA0|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_118024B36F0781101BE6AABE91856EFAFED48B621203A4AF96D54E1A5EECCFA0|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fd182acf1e5bc7db", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_118024B36F0781101BE6AABE91856EFAFED48B621203A4AF96D54E1A5EECCFA0", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of Burlingame", "title": "City of Burlingame \u2014 Transient Occupancy Tax Measure", "description": "Transient Occupancy Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M107-Contest%20Code-Reso-Burlingame%20Occupancy%20Tax_Redacted_0.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.737840", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.737840", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.737840", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Burlingame \u2014 Transient Occupancy Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Transient Occupancy Tax Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M107-Contest%20Code-Reso-Burlingame%20Occupancy%20Tax_Redacted_0.pdf", "sha256": "71f422c7783479f57b833453179ba103c32053aa934d560492a906f4026e7169", "size_bytes": 7169641, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MD-ImpartialAnalysis-Burlingame-Occupancy-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "2bc5eab19fb4a9182452c0bdfa99fb46043e998d51f623a7c8b323323e0cf3bf", "size_bytes": 3856801, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M107-Contest%20Code-4ArgInFavor-Burlingame%20Occupancy%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "06206bfad8171bff690daaaba5cc1d46132093b10df79136961de51daf6b99d2", "size_bytes": 11822413, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M107-Contest%20Code-7ArgAgainst-Burlingame%20Occupancy%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "eceeaf2054fe3a88fca6076e699807c53ec456ef1160586657f73836a260a082", "size_bytes": 12526416, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MD-RebutArgInFavor-Burlingame-Occupancy-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "f9d0b76e43ca89b26c0e5818476372bb9ad53c79a726d72556951eaa2383be48", "size_bytes": 594352, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MD-RebutArgAgainst-Burlingame-Occupancy-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "8e4f37f3797d266936f20364a3cd43d68133ff190dc74dcb899491b27e21928f", "size_bytes": 576118, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12462, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_639CF74D5B008BC4386AE0EDB17BF1DC9A1DF177B98DEA970EEE1187FA026503|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_639CF74D5B008BC4386AE0EDB17BF1DC9A1DF177B98DEA970EEE1187FA026503|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7b1f5a9bb340b26c", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_639CF74D5B008BC4386AE0EDB17BF1DC9A1DF177B98DEA970EEE1187FA026503", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of San Bruno", "title": "City of San Bruno \u2014 Fireworks Ban Measure", "description": "Fireworks Ban Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M304-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Bruno%20Fireworks%20Ban_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.933901", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.933901", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.933901", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of San Bruno \u2014 Fireworks Ban Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Fireworks Ban Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Fireworks Ban Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M304-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Bruno%20Fireworks%20Ban_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "c04e2f5e8f672195d9bd3e7b90415bd0c39c76282f4c091c9573e08e2e4400c6", "size_bytes": 404417, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MDD-ImpartialAnalysis-San-Bruno-Fireworks-Ban.pdf", "sha256": "dfca5fd54b555bd1e6a14fc70cd91f9b70d848d4f9edfd8d3d99c40b52c92b5c", "size_bytes": 82560, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MDD-ArgInFavor-San-Bruno-Fireworks-Ban_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "c4f9dbd87f1cb1f76ea110a2ef8ca30c256a828bb8771c592fdcd66d21a799ed", "size_bytes": 1316486, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M304-Contest%20Code-6ArgAgainst-San%20Bruno%20Fireworks%20Ban_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "29b50b1215893e74228f7e9bd2d20a915273c4c9af8a897226ca50e279312344", "size_bytes": 2789123, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MDD-RebutArgInFavor-San-Bruno-Fireworks-Ban-Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "615bfd5d89375c9a97121da02af8fa3795c541254059683695716f077c4df0fe", "size_bytes": 3848801, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MDD-RebutArgAgainst-San-Bruno-Fireworks-Ban_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "79d538378e26c40d509efb6d8ae2d6872ace63ad6b00c0949f9d4158498bd05c", "size_bytes": 1254463, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12460, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_79F51B7BF9157811C4A435E7FE1B5A13CB73A22DE8E289CF001E7A780871EC8B|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_79F51B7BF9157811C4A435E7FE1B5A13CB73A22DE8E289CF001E7A780871EC8B|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b6e6d50cb231d442", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_79F51B7BF9157811C4A435E7FE1B5A13CB73A22DE8E289CF001E7A780871EC8B", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of Redwood City", "title": "City of Redwood City \u2014 Rent Control and Eviction Limits Initiative", "description": "Rent Control and Eviction Limits Initiative", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M108-Contest%20Code-Reso-RWC%20Housing_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.893020", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.893020", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.893020", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Redwood City \u2014 Rent Control and Eviction Limits Initiative", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Rent Control and Eviction Limits Initiative", "local_measure_type_short": "Rent Control and Eviction Limits Initiative", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M108-Contest%20Code-Reso-RWC%20Housing_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "00f25b487f050792dadb03d7762213d36d190105efd4e695875b62f333259291", "size_bytes": 2851747, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-ME-ImpartialAnalysis-RWC-Housing_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "463224fce1815c4d3fd084336b7ccd1e380cc9c150f22bfc0bb1bf988139f75c", "size_bytes": 385550, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M108-Contest%20Code-5ArgInFavor-RWC%20Housing_Redacted_0.pdf", "sha256": "1e6228b49d0497fa5493cb312bad0e18850609cb1b57a169d4df07ca5a990efb", "size_bytes": 1037969, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M108-Contest%20Code-7ArgAgainst-RWC%20Housing_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "9cc40e7782fe21aaa76cb401d99b9aee5cd813b1945a36865f3a7857104cb588", "size_bytes": 808689, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-ME-RebutArgInFavor-RWC-Housing_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "e0679e994d2aca845c93b32d62c9d88009d71f12a73a4f80cd8d9cb60d681098", "size_bytes": 1632050, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-ME-RebutArgAgainst-RWC-Housing_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "3abab258b0666e67f3d293f284ebd001377084822bd9819b49535280fd3c5f4f", "size_bytes": 1566571, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12463, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_7623FFA7B2FC5B5FFEAF61E951678DBDBEE09EAC97CD3BDE25B6C254FCBCBA5B|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_7623FFA7B2FC5B5FFEAF61E951678DBDBEE09EAC97CD3BDE25B6C254FCBCBA5B|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6c97cd88342d632a", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_7623FFA7B2FC5B5FFEAF61E951678DBDBEE09EAC97CD3BDE25B6C254FCBCBA5B", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of San Bruno", "title": "City of San Bruno \u2014 Business License Tax Measure", "description": "Business License Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M305-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Bruno%20Business%20License%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.953248", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.953248", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.953248", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of San Bruno \u2014 Business License Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Business License Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Business License Tax Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M305-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Bruno%20Business%20License%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "7ca6b593aa3f383b3e875059b2967b3a0fb8f6d9fa049b6f6c48f63c0e7a04da", "size_bytes": 3279281, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MEE-ImpartialAnalysis-San-Bruno-Business-License-Tax.pdf", "sha256": "c115fbb250c53840d6f5df6a2d6f8a05c4ffc3fe6c54850331388ce80119d12b", "size_bytes": 83288, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MEE-ArgInFavor-Argument-San-Bruno-Business-License-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "8e8735aee51fecfa17138e8e444e5b90dfa13b3017a26ea098e408c741b7ce49", "size_bytes": 10364625, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M305-Contest%20Code-7ArgAgainst-San%20Bruno%20Business%20License%20Tax_Redacted%20%281%29.pdf", "sha256": "667dcdf55de8adc65e86c66bb7b2558619fc1c7ff350a73b9c06d39ea673661f", "size_bytes": 726800, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MEE-RebutArgInFavor-San-Bruno-Business-License-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "4f4525cd7ed5d5e2c2dad716f08f968746ea143000c284196abf22daa0621dfb", "size_bytes": 1396003, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MEE-RebutArgAgainst-San-Bruno-Business-License-Tax-Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "122756d6530f73259171b254092a0e9edb9cb4c7739390f68b393b9e2a6fb2a9", "size_bytes": 3787127, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12466, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_F229FDFB43996374AE45A1831377E5485DE0E38BCC6E5861918005852F4950A9|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_F229FDFB43996374AE45A1831377E5485DE0E38BCC6E5861918005852F4950A9|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c7efdd46686e92e5", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_F229FDFB43996374AE45A1831377E5485DE0E38BCC6E5861918005852F4950A9", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of San Mateo", "title": "City of San Mateo \u2014 Charter Amendment Measure", "description": "Charter Amendment Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M209-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Mateo%20Charter%20Amendment_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:36.012167", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:36.012167", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:36.012167", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of San Mateo \u2014 Charter Amendment Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Charter Amendment Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Charter Amendment Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M209-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Mateo%20Charter%20Amendment_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "edbd9d96bf61015a10f6ec87fbc68d4958cd24b57f7a43a18cbb6675d5f6657d", "size_bytes": 1042791, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MF-ImpartialAnalysis-San-Mateo-Charter-Amendment-Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "fe0b8e568c7aba1e99e862a86f7d4b01ee83e26f97085fd19287556996e231db", "size_bytes": 2451172, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M209-Contest%20Code-5ArgInFavor-San%20Mateo%20Charter%20Amendment_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "ba73749b7067cea85c637ab523b4333651a495a1fa2078b0550a4c403019a45e", "size_bytes": 6274168, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}]}, {"id": 12464, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_602C674DE1E220848B45DF1DFF09DB90D9D9FEEB38EF4E8E3C0544451A0AD90A|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_602C674DE1E220848B45DF1DFF09DB90D9D9FEEB38EF4E8E3C0544451A0AD90A|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2c65ece4ef56199d", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_602C674DE1E220848B45DF1DFF09DB90D9D9FEEB38EF4E8E3C0544451A0AD90A", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of San Carlos", "title": "City of San Carlos \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "description": "Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M104-Contest%20Code-Reso-City%20of%20San%20Carlos%20Use%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.972737", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.972737", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.972737", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of San Carlos \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Sales tax", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Sales Tax", "total": 26, "passed": 18, "pass_rate": 69, "since": 2004, "county_label": "San Mateo"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M104-Contest%20Code-Reso-City%20of%20San%20Carlos%20Use%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "b4f9ac9d5c302bd9a6f386fbb128c979c20c02a9b0e28bb4142790f38b62052a", "size_bytes": 4018931, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MG-ImpartialAnalysis-City-of-San-Carlos-Use-Tax.pdf", "sha256": "d2dae6d3a4218bbb102c30e3a3c15e8cb5c2fb150d4d74ba956023636642a40f", "size_bytes": 743223, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MG-ArgInFavor-City-of-San-Carlos-Use-Tax-Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "2d8b2bc802d84004971c4694e4babbe5305b65b935b5a9e94549391130218176", "size_bytes": 407569, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M104-Contest%20Code-7ArgAgainst-City%20of%20San%20Carlos%20Use%20Tax_Redacted%20%281%29.pdf", "sha256": "4aed16b9e4962621e2c10c06eba457104f5b66f33a5b7c0e25c57158914724b2", "size_bytes": 538727, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MG-RebutArgInFavor-City-of-San-Carlos-Use-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "829622b7d49275c676cede8acc76abc63ca9851fa7c45b3ea325a46b72a3abb0", "size_bytes": 3203839, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MG-RebutArgAgainst-City-of-San-Carlos-Use-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "a27a21043e7651c4ff1ea1e7387d15b4d338bb30bd831a2ba41eb000e6f1d621", "size_bytes": 5022976, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12465, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_0D1BFB8B4244A3068AEFC6F9206EA0E8D178E78641F214FB7497B156F939CF0E|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_0D1BFB8B4244A3068AEFC6F9206EA0E8D178E78641F214FB7497B156F939CF0E|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "139d27dc00727a88", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_0D1BFB8B4244A3068AEFC6F9206EA0E8D178E78641F214FB7497B156F939CF0E", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of San Mateo", "title": "City of San Mateo \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "description": "Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M301-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Mateo%20Transactions%20and%20Use%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.992542", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.992542", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.992542", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of San Mateo \u2014 Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Transactions and Use Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Sales tax", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "Sales Tax", "total": 26, "passed": 18, "pass_rate": 69, "since": 2004, "county_label": "San Mateo"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M301-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Mateo%20Transactions%20and%20Use%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "ea78342cd4ac0d4a01221735631c39a861ad4c9da65df49e10d21a55b4c1858f", "size_bytes": 894824, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MH-ImpartialAnalysis-San-Mateo-Transactions-and-Use-Tax-Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "8c34b935da0a8cbd28672c78a4b3bc5ef15bbffa315b427b0568e3ab5f282c7f", "size_bytes": 3985580, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M301-Contest%20Code-5ArgInFavor-San%20Mateo%20Transactions%20and%20Use%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "c5cb46cb770959d55fd62c31a9100afadbe52f4f2f3f18c8d2485ae01d3a739b", "size_bytes": 15323953, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M301-Contest%20Code-7ArgAgainst-San%20Mateo%20Transactions%20and%20Use%20Tax_Redacted%20%282%29%20%281%29_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "ccb96572325a419bf26298111e1f4bb4b06453453ac62f1c0f1f9a7c39d76665", "size_bytes": 16519355, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MH-RebutArgInFavor-San-Mateo-Transactions-and-Use-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "cf958aa9799c85452d50b819bdd9cda372584d97e4dce650f72b832a4a4b5005", "size_bytes": 1184682, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MH-RebutArgAgainst-San-Mateo-Transactions-and-Use-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "39f8cda2bf4e435b756a6e89b74f2a851c825f2185383ad8d5f65eef6c6337f5", "size_bytes": 21354356, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12455, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_7FCAA56978B36B2F2C20550D75B658564DC57C3376CDFE2659C2E630261E9B55|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_7FCAA56978B36B2F2C20550D75B658564DC57C3376CDFE2659C2E630261E9B55|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "64ba4fca22fc8592", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_7FCAA56978B36B2F2C20550D75B658564DC57C3376CDFE2659C2E630261E9B55", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of Half Moon Bay", "title": "City of Half Moon Bay \u2014 Coastal Land Use Measure", "description": "Coastal Land Use Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M309-Contest%20Code-Reso-Half%20Moon%20Bay%20Coastal%20Land_Redacted_0.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.796912", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.796912", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.796912", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Half Moon Bay \u2014 Coastal Land Use Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Coastal Land Use Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Coastal Land Use Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M309-Contest%20Code-Reso-Half%20Moon%20Bay%20Coastal%20Land_Redacted_0.pdf", "sha256": "f9b8e79352f36d499bfa86ee55d00a4b9ec73bf33a90bf82cd04122685ca5338", "size_bytes": 1599439, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MI-ImpartialAnalysis-Half-Moon-Bay-Coastal-Land_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "4f0adf00b5b516f7c2cd1869f8cbcbb152961a64b2af1e656c085584314a5bf8", "size_bytes": 17165, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M309-Contest%20Code-4ArgInFavor-Half%20Moon%20Bay%20Coastal%20Land_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "3026e0a50cf82e5cb5c8095becc855b06ce271426264a75f31386f452d887e2b", "size_bytes": 3283763, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}]}, {"id": 12440, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_3868218FDB1522B898EB34ED17DCA4D54CF2052DAFF17EA50D664290D7D90B94|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_3868218FDB1522B898EB34ED17DCA4D54CF2052DAFF17EA50D664290D7D90B94|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "72b94f3780d022ad", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_3868218FDB1522B898EB34ED17DCA4D54CF2052DAFF17EA50D664290D7D90B94", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "San Mateo County", "title": "San Mateo County \u2014 Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Extension to Call a Special Election or Appoint", "description": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Extension to Call a Special Election or Appoint", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/San%20Mateo%20County%20Amendments.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.498458", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.498458", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.498458", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo County \u2014 Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Extension to Call a Special Election or Appoint", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Extension to Call a Special Election or Appoint", "local_measure_type_short": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Extension to Call a Special Election or Appoint", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/San%20Mateo%20County%20Amendments.pdf", "sha256": "db9b218ebad34190631d655a933a558be422f90d367b4ad07c51ef85c59efae6", "size_bytes": 1315004, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MJ-ImpartialAnalysis-SMC-Charter-Extension-to-Call%20Special%20Election.pdf", "sha256": "db9d881a44157b18338295c51952269c622596f9e195894166db6fb3057de16d", "size_bytes": 80899, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}]}, {"id": 12447, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_482E0F332DFF47D6C3EB201700838426C80C0270FE660CDBDF8261BA2738E11B|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_482E0F332DFF47D6C3EB201700838426C80C0270FE660CDBDF8261BA2738E11B|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a270ad819e6181e5", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_482E0F332DFF47D6C3EB201700838426C80C0270FE660CDBDF8261BA2738E11B", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "San Carlos School District", "title": "San Carlos School District \u2014 Parcel Tax Measure", "description": "Parcel Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "66.67%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-05/52-ENG-M101-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Carlos%20SD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.641035", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.641035", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.641035", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Carlos School District \u2014 Parcel Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Parcel Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Parcel Tax Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-05/52-ENG-M101-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Carlos%20SD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "00dfb84d7bb7512dfe4f3ec651142a3e3438b0c688f6a4cdeb0413657989fb78", "size_bytes": 953907, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MK-ImpartialAnalysis-San-Carlos-SD-Parcel-Tax.pdf", "sha256": "e98ffee2d4fc2ba93d0f4295e36f00a1ffd2a7c7bf7340cf3b832724d7d036ed", "size_bytes": 109462, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M101-Contest%20Code-5ArgInFavor-San%20Carlos%20SD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "46598b5336fac7f477746dda696c0895d4124106debfc166f29068a4eddd453a", "size_bytes": 493679, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}]}, {"id": 12438, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_4A1D73192B9FE939E9102937141488F2348DF1533EE882950638A6289DE7F493|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_4A1D73192B9FE939E9102937141488F2348DF1533EE882950638A6289DE7F493|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f2cc2188c3e76f8a", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_4A1D73192B9FE939E9102937141488F2348DF1533EE882950638A6289DE7F493", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "San Mateo County", "title": "San Mateo County \u2014 Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Extreme Weather Events", "description": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Extreme Weather Events", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/San%20Mateo%20County%20Amendments.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.455395", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.455395", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.455395", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo County \u2014 Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Extreme Weather Events", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Extreme Weather Events", "local_measure_type_short": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Extreme Weather Events", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/San%20Mateo%20County%20Amendments.pdf", "sha256": "db9b218ebad34190631d655a933a558be422f90d367b4ad07c51ef85c59efae6", "size_bytes": 1315004, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-ML-ImpartialAnalysis-SMC-Charter-Extreme-Weather.pdf", "sha256": "00f5fa81560a4ae0e5acc4bb2163cca312f95d6357a1e260f93467bbe556fa49", "size_bytes": 51181, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}]}, {"id": 12445, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_C1207F0CC18ADA1EBE26BF48C618F84D4F62FB4CFE3B3618513B0327C5C9C047|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_C1207F0CC18ADA1EBE26BF48C618F84D4F62FB4CFE3B3618513B0327C5C9C047|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9e5429ba944d3632", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_C1207F0CC18ADA1EBE26BF48C618F84D4F62FB4CFE3B3618513B0327C5C9C047", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "Jefferson Union High School District", "title": "Jefferson Union High School District \u2014 Parcel Tax Measure", "description": "Parcel Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "66.67%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M106-Contest%20Code-Reso-JUHSD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.601035", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.601035", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.601035", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Jefferson Union High School District \u2014 Parcel Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Parcel Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Parcel Tax Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M106-Contest%20Code-Reso-JUHSD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "b6b2d9c3bce3928ac3860571799df277e19a831d9d06d7ad4022f865ce4e5d52", "size_bytes": 844005, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MM-ImpartialAnalysis-JUHSD-Parcel-Tax.pdf", "sha256": "acc83b79b2e0f4a6193103ffdeeaea46e04f3137baf7c82200ab586221f29eef", "size_bytes": 241701, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M106-Contest%20Code-4ArgInFavor-JUHSD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "205980fb9e90782b2e6eea54b68d2903fbdc630ef8b6a2c91b1a76c8aa09f652", "size_bytes": 1092834, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M106-Contest%20Code-7ArgAgainst-JUHSD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "dd1600146342bd0a3227536863601b5368d1ff530f9fd057d156ddf17e6be26c", "size_bytes": 439615, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MM-RebutArgAgainst-JUHSD-Parcel-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "d5530a5212ce14e161b98ed055b529b601de1e0bca2b9a70af17607e8f3d3a67", "size_bytes": 964933, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12459, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_8064068F2187FE3FFE6A960657F93FF52E88EAD3FC44936758ADC32338D601C8|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_8064068F2187FE3FFE6A960657F93FF52E88EAD3FC44936758ADC32338D601C8|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c2de5723ecb581d8", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_8064068F2187FE3FFE6A960657F93FF52E88EAD3FC44936758ADC32338D601C8", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "Town of Portola Valley", "title": "Town of Portola Valley \u2014 Town Charter and Property Transfer Tax Measure", "description": "Town Charter and Property Transfer Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M205-Contest%20Code-Reso-Portola%20Valley%20Transfer%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.873865", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.873865", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.873865", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Town of Portola Valley \u2014 Town Charter and Property Transfer Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Town Charter and Property Transfer Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Town Charter and Property Transfer Tax Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M205-Contest%20Code-Reso-Portola%20Valley%20Transfer%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "dee8e20e8db3f7a5a273d6923a5da9e494383ba98a26a0ffdd3b6917a4199ede", "size_bytes": 1034076, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MN-ImpartialAnalysis-PortolaValley-Transfer-Tax.pdf", "sha256": "a4bf0ccc1abecfa186d481984a9cefbd8c40210b29ee91436efd25356a90afcc", "size_bytes": 149700, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M205-Contest%20Code-5ArgInFavor-Portola%20Valley%20Transfer%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "8309a838e75c2ad31814b6ac352c7ed85e41e06a61214eba7a0659faebbe0db6", "size_bytes": 39630054, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M205-Contest%20Code-6ArgAgainst-Portola%20Valley%20Transfer%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "7f9fdc32198bc884d8c41662a5e625c64dfcd6840ff420c831db078bbd9463e5", "size_bytes": 345831, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MN-RebutArgInFavor-Portola%20Valley-Transfer-Tax_Redacted_.pdf", "sha256": "230c88711743040ee4e03330a4b7ba98d8c40a5aa3576965e876cb8b6957f63f", "size_bytes": 2796274, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MN-RebutArgAgainst-PortolaValley-Transfer-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "5b2b4bbdb746857a985e20d3c69ee486c38f2456111b3b350cb852cc68a272b3", "size_bytes": 78438689, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12453, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_48967B91930A718D895EB79D39C8025E745F0D4C636F4AFF74E8FD0445051D3D|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_48967B91930A718D895EB79D39C8025E745F0D4C636F4AFF74E8FD0445051D3D|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d4e23b01bbfea1ab", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_48967B91930A718D895EB79D39C8025E745F0D4C636F4AFF74E8FD0445051D3D", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of East Palo Alto", "title": "City of East Palo Alto \u2014 Bond Measure", "description": "Bond Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "66.67%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M207-Contest%20Code-Reso-City%20of%20East%20Palo%20Alto%20Bond_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.756705", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.756705", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.756705", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of East Palo Alto \u2014 Bond Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Bond Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Bond", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "GO Bond", "total": 102, "passed": 89, "pass_rate": 87, "since": 1998, "county_label": "San Mateo"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M207-Contest%20Code-Reso-City%20of%20East%20Palo%20Alto%20Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "2a4cbc33915d3b03626cac9c068c6bca0441fdd251e8fc1a31965ef1b4e25d2e", "size_bytes": 1470709, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "tax_rate_statement", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Tax rate statement", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MO-ImpartialAnalysis-City-of-East-Palo-Alto-Bond.pdf", "sha256": "c8c684f600c2694ac3e576f89c7fd984ce0f9853891fcc85547357a36e866326", "size_bytes": 146494, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MO-ArgInFavor-City-of-East-Palo-Alto-Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "70618aa4b7393cee4d6ab832dae6437a1cc0e97e439768ff8ad6877a19ed787f", "size_bytes": 1786500, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MO-ArgAgainst-City-of-East-Palo-Alto-Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "1805fa4dad4a688c09f70933589fe321794a5b82a14add62b399b959366331d2", "size_bytes": 1072252, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MO-RebutArgAgainst-City-of-East-Palo-Alto-Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "baa2fecfe0ec776f0d8d2681766d42683b87e846aa19a77290d56a77fa71e54e", "size_bytes": 363728, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12457, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_2113D4BCC137BFDCF490A9629215FB30AB2F1A9C0A883FC643B69EE14F88C5D9|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_2113D4BCC137BFDCF490A9629215FB30AB2F1A9C0A883FC643B69EE14F88C5D9|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e0c627fefab9d966", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_2113D4BCC137BFDCF490A9629215FB30AB2F1A9C0A883FC643B69EE14F88C5D9", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of Menlo Park", "title": "City of Menlo Park \u2014 Citizen Initiative to Amend Municipal Code", "description": "Citizen Initiative to Amend Municipal Code", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-05/52-ENG-M102-Contest%20Code-Reso-Menlo%20Park%20Muni%20Amendment_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.835596", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.835596", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.835596", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Menlo Park \u2014 Citizen Initiative to Amend Municipal Code", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Citizen Initiative to Amend Municipal Code", "local_measure_type_short": "Citizen Initiative to Amend Municipal Code", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-05/52-ENG-M102-Contest%20Code-Reso-Menlo%20Park%20Muni%20Amendment_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "b4c7febfe4a4e77b32ffc71090a69e8f1bd9291fbaee6f718a28faab9fcb4282", "size_bytes": 882351, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MP-ImpartialAnalysis-MenloPark-Muni-Amendment.pdf", "sha256": "f1218f97286257c9e446fc967f4fce99649252019b1d466908d9b140c2eacea5", "size_bytes": 137167, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M102-ContestCode-7ArgInFavor-Menlo%20Park%20Muni%20Amendment_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "737fb4c7845f9f911d83144da5a1239a76dbe6a6f1d7780b194312dea5afc180", "size_bytes": 581419, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M102-Contest%20Code-6ArgAgainst-Menlo%20Park%20Muni%20Amendment_Redacted_0.pdf", "sha256": "7f4ee8b6105a6296aec50d58358aab88fc6020b61e01c7447f0dd30e7c445c08", "size_bytes": 15060332, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MP-RebutArgInFavor-Menlo-Park-Muni-Amendment-Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "d3fafbbc93d71c1091b14998071796d4158072079297cda54059e68d479ac78b", "size_bytes": 18926433, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MP-RebutAgainst-Menlo-Park-Muni-Amendment_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "a4973738b3d619da75f617d8e18e98a946619646adc30d882ae2a172710ac188", "size_bytes": 706671, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12456, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_A3894E8A8E533530BE19222827008F97865051D0877781BF2A9737E078D7682E|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_A3894E8A8E533530BE19222827008F97865051D0877781BF2A9737E078D7682E|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ae8e0c3e8b1aee66", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_A3894E8A8E533530BE19222827008F97865051D0877781BF2A9737E078D7682E", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of Half Moon Bay", "title": "City of Half Moon Bay \u2014 Housing Initiative Measure", "description": "Housing Initiative Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.815546", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.815546", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.815546", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Half Moon Bay \u2014 Housing Initiative Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Housing Initiative Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Housing Initiative Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MQ-ImpartialAnalysis-Half-Moon-Bay-Housing_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "af800e1c0e5ac9d7f89c5a3af486ab5e831e5b92c3dc95fd6054b7a9b4a47d06", "size_bytes": 18054, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M401-Contest%20Code-4ArgInFavor-Half%20Moon%20Bay%20Housing%20Initiative_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "9f2147209e7ee447eeaf3edb54592c4bd8ace2518ac6d62c9f742b0b97fd4e64", "size_bytes": 6119303, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M401-Contest%20Code-Reso-Half%20Moon%20Bay%20Housing%20Initiative_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "3b2ae9f9f12745043027c5b386aa34bf9fe972b5b17e522b424e5c7d7d515083", "size_bytes": 452121, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["resolution"], "labels": ["Resolution"]}]}, {"id": 12443, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_B4CAC7D4A447B3A909C8E88CB98730B080DEE7E17768ABC3B9AC7D45EE16037A|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_B4CAC7D4A447B3A909C8E88CB98730B080DEE7E17768ABC3B9AC7D45EE16037A|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "3f44f61461bb3942", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_B4CAC7D4A447B3A909C8E88CB98730B080DEE7E17768ABC3B9AC7D45EE16037A", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "Burlingame School District", "title": "Burlingame School District \u2014 Bond Measure", "description": "Bond Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "55%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M105-Contest%20Code-Reso-Burlingame%20ESD%20Bon_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.557430", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.557430", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.557430", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Burlingame School District \u2014 Bond Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Bond Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Bond", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "GO Bond", "total": 102, "passed": 89, "pass_rate": 87, "since": 1998, "county_label": "San Mateo"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M105-Contest%20Code-Reso-Burlingame%20ESD%20Bon_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "e16fa8a147865340d54aee5421dd9e545c5321ca9d9df4389034096b92701d1f", "size_bytes": 887991, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "tax_rate_statement", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Tax rate statement", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MR-ImpartialAnalysis-Burlingame-ESD-Bond.pdf", "sha256": "ddeb0a284c6526f6f01a13062350068311d157dba816049dda972745c003eab4", "size_bytes": 117197, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M105-Contest%20Code-5ArgInFavor-Burlingame%20ESD%20Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "2f1782b3741aa14d677dc434bedb0a02286a1ea3327e555c03761606eec615dd", "size_bytes": 1621180, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M105-Contest%20Code-7ArgAgainst-Burlingame%20ESD%20Bon_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "389bb42b97fcf694596a91132d2e907f5f80068741789c2147262e8582cf8ecc", "size_bytes": 2792842, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MR-RebutArgInFavor-Burlingame-ESD-Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "1c6558e77dc833326a7afe8c65b0a5dfde957f93e6b1355584ecf062497ae0dc", "size_bytes": 500992, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MR-RebutArgAgainst-Burlingame-ESD-Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "11a4d055adad0b2968befa775d9e4d4bbf904e15a3611dcba3c6f2ffe6336829", "size_bytes": 2919153, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12461, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_8F589AAE3380FCAF8773EBEA9A71DC6D3C57AE3DF4988C75E8FD8F27828E7265|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_8F589AAE3380FCAF8773EBEA9A71DC6D3C57AE3DF4988C75E8FD8F27828E7265|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f0aafb505de2ffae", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_8F589AAE3380FCAF8773EBEA9A71DC6D3C57AE3DF4988C75E8FD8F27828E7265", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of San Bruno", "title": "City of San Bruno \u2014 Housing Permits and Developments Measure", "description": "Housing Permits and Developments Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M303-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Bruno%20Hosuing%20Permit%20and%20Development_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.912374", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.912374", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.912374", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of San Bruno \u2014 Housing Permits and Developments Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Housing Permits and Developments Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Housing Permits and Developments Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M303-Contest%20Code-Reso-San%20Bruno%20Hosuing%20Permit%20and%20Development_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "eb4e70296f4e7abb53937614c33bf88c643138039a521495c8f8064e588278a2", "size_bytes": 542991, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MS-ImpartialAnalysis-San-Bruno-Hosuing-Permit-and-Development.pdf", "sha256": "c2abf4150dae76ae670975d8030c06aa5bf4f5f5375cd6ce1e430fff3b207c86", "size_bytes": 78731, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MS-ArgInFavor-San-Bruno-Housing-Permit-and-Development_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "6bb771b2c36014819b2a138742d7ea2e09295063bd0e647fe286a6c2ea413670", "size_bytes": 9097661, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}]}, {"id": 12446, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_5150D2460BC06B55E196C34C0B91D4BA6D4ECCB2DD15B7B41988DEEC6EB91035|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_5150D2460BC06B55E196C34C0B91D4BA6D4ECCB2DD15B7B41988DEEC6EB91035|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "52c3108458d73cc6", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_5150D2460BC06B55E196C34C0B91D4BA6D4ECCB2DD15B7B41988DEEC6EB91035", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "Pacifica School District", "title": "Pacifica School District \u2014 Parcel Tax Measure", "description": "Parcel Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "66.67%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-06/52-ENG-M103-Contest%20Code-Reso-Pacifica%20SD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.621455", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.621455", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.621455", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Pacifica School District \u2014 Parcel Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Parcel Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Parcel Tax Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-06/52-ENG-M103-Contest%20Code-Reso-Pacifica%20SD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "bc7dbdf927311df3ec5d264fdfec8c799a1337e1ded8815a615d3fdbb25620a0", "size_bytes": 638745, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MT-ImpartialAnalysis-Pacifica-SD-Parcel-Tax.pdf", "sha256": "ab45c11ea1f039d9dd2b1a0af0b7059a7bbf1b769f0223eac297f3a103e477be", "size_bytes": 95071, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M103-Contest%20Code-5ArgInFavor-Pacifica%20SD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "42f85a8e3d6a21dab967f9a90c8cddf5c4bce7c6fadcd146345b4c3c42781a89", "size_bytes": 938877, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M103-Contest%20Code-7ArgAgainst-Pacifica%20SD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted_0_0.pdf", "sha256": "83940a75f26ec2258c5d6474301be8060396d31844fc3a786443b9642fd556a0", "size_bytes": 2823778, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MT-RebutArgInFavor-Pacifica-SD-Parcel-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "e249022649cf1de03203bc827aea9c6fa222eb0788bab70fbcf670bb1af8ed5a", "size_bytes": 466189, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MT-RebutArgAgainst-Pacifica-SD-Parcel-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "b3a49405733d134be0a2bf349e92ea295dd1b22ffae1f240c40f133983320f0c", "size_bytes": 4118503, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12441, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_3E95753EF021F96C4EDB01CAC1B4BCBBD579248807D962A7322634CA872C6EF9|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_3E95753EF021F96C4EDB01CAC1B4BCBBD579248807D962A7322634CA872C6EF9|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b084590ef3266966", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_3E95753EF021F96C4EDB01CAC1B4BCBBD579248807D962A7322634CA872C6EF9", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "San Mateo County", "title": "San Mateo County \u2014 Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Reapportionment of Supervisorial Districts", "description": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Reapportionment of Supervisorial Districts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/San%20Mateo%20County%20Amendments.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.518604", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.518604", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.518604", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo County \u2014 Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Reapportionment of Supervisorial Districts", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Reapportionment of Supervisorial Districts", "local_measure_type_short": "Charter Amendment Measure \u2013 Reapportionment of Supervisorial Districts", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/San%20Mateo%20County%20Amendments.pdf", "sha256": "db9b218ebad34190631d655a933a558be422f90d367b4ad07c51ef85c59efae6", "size_bytes": 1315004, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MU-ImpartialAnalysis-SMC-Charter-Reapportionment.pdf", "sha256": "dbd9fddde80d2c03052b1a1164291a6a1e16b0f9569b1b40286cac0f253a616b", "size_bytes": 783804, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-204-Contest%20Code-5ArgInFavor-SMC%20Charter_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "e97d9cbc2c6b6e7c52ede87f487cc7abd4f4ae274fd8e02f5ae5cbbba1764ea7", "size_bytes": 68413834, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}]}, {"id": 12448, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_62720B57304B56A9F48BFEF144735E731F54C075EE7CDE001B44F76A64C31164|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_62720B57304B56A9F48BFEF144735E731F54C075EE7CDE001B44F76A64C31164|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ec20ac03d5cb134d", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_62720B57304B56A9F48BFEF144735E731F54C075EE7CDE001B44F76A64C31164", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "San Mateo County Community College District", "title": "San Mateo County Community College District \u2014 Bond Measure", "description": "Bond Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "55%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M307-Contest%20Code-Reso-SMCCD%20Bond_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.660953", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.660953", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.660953", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo County Community College District \u2014 Bond Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Bond Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Bond", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "GO Bond", "total": 102, "passed": 89, "pass_rate": 87, "since": 1998, "county_label": "San Mateo"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M307-Contest%20Code-Reso-SMCCD%20Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "2a44e4aec2b7613fd7c69583e39a7ef2211fba465c221eb9b2dceafd1a0993b7", "size_bytes": 1299765, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "tax_rate_statement", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Tax rate statement", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MV-ImpartialAnalysis-SMCCD-Bond.pdf", "sha256": "77e2de30fa2e015262762725b1d3f88d05407df23574a779c8b0f7e73314e91f", "size_bytes": 116969, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M307-Contest%20Code-5ArgInFavor-SMCCD%20Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "79cc6d976a7ac2fd0f72b5e9c3f0613d47a3b9fc724141fcb67e91d4628879d8", "size_bytes": 1848688, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M307-Contest%20Code-6ArgAgainst-SMCCD%20Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "cbeb9b14b8445088b169c6ab417a697ef6cfa0bd2250432c106d363252fa7d29", "size_bytes": 973131, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MV-RebutArgInFavor-SMCCD-Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "e3d0b28dc8fdc2ed3927d3ebad7608e511de0755d0dd2021127b4b61d15fcea6", "size_bytes": 888524, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MV-RebutArgAgainst-SMCCD-Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "546a20d015f7196692fdb320cd42f13c512c6fbfdcdc2ed54cf89c0f56314d72", "size_bytes": 1769984, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12449, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_6B9514EE4FB50BEE25A4D36F67F2F9579759A0D73B05103ED2383106E516DC28|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_6B9514EE4FB50BEE25A4D36F67F2F9579759A0D73B05103ED2383106E516DC28|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c9a50341d89857e0", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_6B9514EE4FB50BEE25A4D36F67F2F9579759A0D73B05103ED2383106E516DC28", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "San Mateo-Foster City School District", "title": "San Mateo-Foster City School District \u2014 Bond Measure", "description": "Bond Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "55%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M306-Contest%20Code-Reso-SMFCSD%20Bond_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.680370", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.680370", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.680370", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo-Foster City School District \u2014 Bond Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Bond Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Bond", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "local_historical_context": {"category_type": "GO Bond", "total": 102, "passed": 89, "pass_rate": 87, "since": 1998, "county_label": "San Mateo"}, "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M306-Contest%20Code-Reso-SMFCSD%20Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "df14dc287302eaa24029ee4664988e8161fac276a58d8afa757c24508ab39ba5", "size_bytes": 966297, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "tax_rate_statement", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Tax rate statement", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MW-ImpartialAnalysis-SMFCSD-Bond.pdf", "sha256": "a44c93b09b166f87a90174004c7beda48251fadcd10120360f9c74ecb8734176", "size_bytes": 108796, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M306-Contest%20Code-5ArgInFavor-SMFCSD%20Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "19a8a8b76995435df98d9ae841421f53642655a70620dc6a244dbf791ad83aec", "size_bytes": 1655126, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M306-Contest%20Code-7ArgAgainst-SMFCSD%20Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "40d83fde1903a13e1ec3053dcde6d64111db4c102fbc7dde8f43f323cd46e136", "size_bytes": 8847026, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MW-RebutArgInFavor-SMFCSD-Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "2ad2c39bb69c0c7606e28727d69de8657db70380993aea051e205a536e48deb7", "size_bytes": 1048798, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MW-RebutArgAgainst-SMFCSD-Bond_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "914886c6ed3369334cc6005d2266a7b74814c32ebcb6122e4fc5301df9587526", "size_bytes": 3051283, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12451, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_64FC91B61D21E265EBC5D1B153C84BBD4C1D861B50527F39A014FEBA8223F88B|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_64FC91B61D21E265EBC5D1B153C84BBD4C1D861B50527F39A014FEBA8223F88B|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e8476b4be967d8c2", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_64FC91B61D21E265EBC5D1B153C84BBD4C1D861B50527F39A014FEBA8223F88B", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of Brisbane", "title": "City of Brisbane \u2014 Business License Tax Measure", "description": "Business License Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M302-Contest%20Code-Reso-City%20of%20Brisbane%20Business%20License%20Tax_Redacted_1.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.718844", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.718844", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.718844", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Brisbane \u2014 Business License Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Business License Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Business License Tax Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M302-Contest%20Code-Reso-City%20of%20Brisbane%20Business%20License%20Tax_Redacted_1.pdf", "sha256": "dd2389d19c9923ae4af1be749cf7b50a3bc685714ca31b8849f7b8aa133ce3ef", "size_bytes": 1746328, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MX-ImpartialAnalysis-City-of-Brisbane-Business-License-Tax.pdf", "sha256": "d005ee006c504ea188734b5793540052f6c182afe66cde90ef68f88aca349bb3", "size_bytes": 66703, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M302-Contest%20Code-4ArgInFavor-City%20of%20Brisbane%20Business%20License%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "0419962b178beb59be80edd12a2b18dd0eb728b3ebeb429f141ac115deb41b8f", "size_bytes": 642232, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}]}, {"id": 12450, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_A639D525D381B12B19EA2C7FA1D2F6540201111269C7110313CDC6659C939A80|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_A639D525D381B12B19EA2C7FA1D2F6540201111269C7110313CDC6659C939A80|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "003eeb94089e3217", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_A639D525D381B12B19EA2C7FA1D2F6540201111269C7110313CDC6659C939A80", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "City of Belmont", "title": "City of Belmont \u2014 Special Tax Measure", "description": "Special Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "50%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M308-Contest%20Code-Reso-Belmont%20Special%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.699918", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.699918", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.699918", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Belmont \u2014 Special Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Special Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Special Tax Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M308-Contest%20Code-Reso-Belmont%20Special%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "aaf00fbc8562ce0f8fac11c587d3b8c03a5875d270cc28ff0a59d66fffe99854", "size_bytes": 935569, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MY-ImpartialAnalysis-Belmont-Special-Tax.pdf", "sha256": "710020a1cc79ce0ab6c1d0557a1cfa19fd19468dbcf06af1f737925a74d2c700", "size_bytes": 307771, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M308-Contest%20Code-ArgInFavor-Belmont%20Special%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "f9adeb02e2e62aee094e7453061bba57bce79f132cb921304e6ee5bbe76a9d7d", "size_bytes": 2177897, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M308-Contest%20Code-7ArgAgainst-Belmont%20Special%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "11c2cc700bdc68d8425aa9a1ab7fc945552721edd7e052dc19590211cd9f9efd", "size_bytes": 1416438, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_against"], "labels": ["Argument against"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MY-RebutArgInFavor-Belmont-Special-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "df071709ace6a0739db3ab19a3030be34d7cb739730b509175270c6c419590c0", "size_bytes": 2300962, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_for"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument in favor"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MY-RebutArgAgainst-Belmont-Special-Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "acb4acb26533af07a806e0df7f8e2b2048f1b326a2983fe76f5516fc65f465d8", "size_bytes": 2544582, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["rebuttal_against"], "labels": ["Rebuttal to argument against"]}]}, {"id": 12444, "fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_E3FB497442EC2C1F59FAD851C1E9CA22D63819D5B9802455C6B00E0F2508304B|SAN MATEO|SMC_County_Registrar", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|REG_SMC_20261103_E3FB497442EC2C1F59FAD851C1E9CA22D63819D5B9802455C6B00E0F2508304B|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a48c3c726dffed93", "measure_id": "REG_SMC_20261103_E3FB497442EC2C1F59FAD851C1E9CA22D63819D5B9802455C6B00E0F2508304B", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "Cabrillo Unified School District", "title": "Cabrillo Unified School District \u2014 Parcel Tax Measure", "description": "Parcel Tax Measure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": "66.67%", "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "pdf_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M109-Contest%20Code-Reso-Cabrillo%20USD%20Parcel%20Tax.pdf", "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2026-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.577889", "updated_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.577889", "last_seen_at": "2026-08-31T20:18:35.577889", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Cabrillo Unified School District \u2014 Parcel Tax Measure", "source": "SMC_County_Registrar", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "upcoming_scope": "local", "upcoming_county": "San Mateo", "local_measure_type": "Parcel Tax Measure", "local_measure_type_short": "Parcel Tax Measure", "source_display": "San Mateo County Registrar", "official_documents": [{"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-07/52-ENG-M109-Contest%20Code-Reso-Cabrillo%20USD%20Parcel%20Tax.pdf", "sha256": "a3be79e88d15dc14e57ec218320c9997b5ac9f61a83997e04c5e2de73e53ce3b", "size_bytes": 2022238, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["text", "resolution"], "labels": ["Full ballot text", "Resolution"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-MZ-ImpartialAnalysis-Cabrillo-USD-Parcel-Tax.pdf", "sha256": "82eb13562f4933253fd8fccc62694107fcbc217ab09bd07c0f7c64e2ba3ab967", "size_bytes": 245952, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["analysis"], "labels": ["Impartial analysis"]}, {"source_url": "https://smcacre.gov/system/files/2026-08/52-ENG-M109-Contest%20Code-5ArgInFavor-Cabrillo%20USD%20Parcel%20Tax_Redacted.pdf", "sha256": "a6347b3f74ad49a782648fc5675db11af98028e441dd7960cb1861c009596c6b", "size_bytes": 1888034, "content_type": "application/pdf", "captured_at": "2026-09-07T17:33:58.605931+00:00", "source_page_url": "https://smcacre.gov/elections/november-3-2026-statewide-general-election", "roles": ["argument_for"], "labels": ["Argument in favor"]}]}, {"id": 10960, "fingerprint": "2026|INIT_2012|Statewide|CA_SOS", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|INIT_2012|Statewide", "content_hash": "5ad8ada320d33893", "measure_id": "INIT_1993", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Provides Permanent Funding for Schools and Healthcare by Extending Existing Tax Rates", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CA_SOS", "source_url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/initiative-and-referendum-status/circulating-initiatives-25percent-signatures", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would make permanent the existing temporary tax rates on high-in...", "summary_text": "This measure would make permanent the existing temporary tax rates on high-income earners that are currently set to expire in 2031, applying to income over approximately $360,000-$721,000 depending on filing status. The measure would maintain $5-15 billion in annual state income tax revenue, with 89% allocated to K-12 schools and 11% to community colleges.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:52:14.172320", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:52:14.172320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:52:14.172320", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Provides Permanent Funding for Schools and Healthcare by Extending Existing Tax Rates", "source": "CA_SOS", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA SOS - Qualified Measures", "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/qualified-ballot-measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "CA SOS Eligible Measures", "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/initiative-and-referendum-status/eligible-statewide-initiative-measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Ballot Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "Campaign Finance", "url": "https://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Measures/list.aspx?session=2025", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "Official Voter Guide", "url": "https://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "Voter's Edge CA", "url": "https://votersedge.org/ca", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}], "upcoming_scope": "statewide", "historical_context": {"matched_topic": "Education", "total_similar": 50, "pass_rate": 82.0, "avg_yes": 70.1, "median_yes": 72.6, "year_range": "2009-2024", "top_similar": [{"year": 2022, "county": "Santa Clara", "title": "This measure renews an expiring $85 per parcel tax for the Campbell Union Hig...", "percent_yes": 75.9, "passed": 1, "similarity": 70.0}, {"year": 2024, "county": "Solano", "title": "This measure would have renewed Davis Joint Unified School District's existin...", "percent_yes": 33.3, "passed": 0, "similarity": 68.0}, {"year": 2022, "county": "Santa Barbara", "title": "The measure extends the Hope Elementary School District's existing $79 per ye...", "percent_yes": 76.1, "passed": 1, "similarity": 68.0}], "closest_races": [{"year": 2022, "county": "Contra Costa", "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure A", "percent_yes": 51.5, "passed": 0}, {"year": 2020, "county": "Santa Clara", "title": "To acquire computers and classroom technology for improved s", "percent_yes": 52.4, "passed": 0}, {"year": 2012, "county": "Solano", "title": "To offset the continued loss of significant state funding, s", "percent_yes": 53.3, "passed": 0}]}}, {"id": 10956, "fingerprint": "2026|SB_42|Statewide|CA_SOS", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|SB_42|Statewide", "content_hash": "641dc0e58960ec49", "measure_id": "SB_42", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SB 42 (Umberg) \u2014 California Fair Elections Act of 2026", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Legislative Statute", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform", "data_source": "CA_SOS", "source_url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/qualified-ballot-measures", "pdf_url": "http://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/ballot-measures/pdf/sb-42.pdf", "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would establish a public campaign financing system in Cal...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would establish a public campaign financing system in California, allowing eligible candidates to receive government funding for their campaigns instead of relying solely on private donations. The measure implements the California Fair Elections Act of 2026 as an amendment to the existing Political Reform Act of 1974.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "November 3, 2026", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:52:14.172161", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:52:14.172161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:52:14.172161", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SB 42 (Umberg) \u2014 California Fair Elections Act of 2026", "source": "CA_SOS", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Legislative Statute", "external_links": [{"source": "CA SOS - Qualified Measures", "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/qualified-ballot-measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "CA SOS Eligible Measures", "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/initiative-and-referendum-status/eligible-statewide-initiative-measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "CA Legislature (Senate Bill)", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB42", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Ballot Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "Campaign Finance", "url": "https://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Measures/list.aspx?session=2025", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "Official Voter Guide", "url": "https://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "Voter's Edge CA", "url": "https://votersedge.org/ca", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}], "upcoming_scope": "statewide", "historical_context": {"matched_topic": "Government & Elections", "total_similar": 50, "pass_rate": 82.0, "avg_yes": 64.1, "median_yes": 65.5, "year_range": "1998-2024", "top_similar": [{"year": 2022, "county": "Alameda", "title": "This measure amended Oakland's Municipal Code and City Charter to create a pu...", "percent_yes": 73.9, "passed": 1, "similarity": 57.0}, {"year": 2022, "county": "San Francisco", "title": "This charter amendment moved elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney,...", "percent_yes": 71.2, "passed": 1, "similarity": 57.0}, {"year": 2003, "county": "San Joaquin", "title": "Shall the City of Stockton adopt a Charter amendment to prov", "percent_yes": 82.2, "passed": 1, "similarity": 57.0}], "closest_races": [{"year": 2024, "county": "San Diego", "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure G", "percent_yes": 49.5, "passed": 0}, {"year": 2022, "county": "San Bernardino", "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure EE", "percent_yes": 50.6, "passed": 1}, {"year": 2020, "county": "San Francisco", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to allow San Francisco resi", "percent_yes": 49.2, "passed": 0}]}}, {"id": 2, "fingerprint": "2026|SCA 1 (NEWMAN) ELECTIONS: RECALL OF STATE OFFICERS|Statewide|CA_SOS", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|SCA 1 (NEWMAN) ELECTIONS: RECALL OF STATE OFFICERS|Statewide", "content_hash": "70a79554fbb717b4", "measure_id": "SCA 1 (Newman) Elections: recall of state officers", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SCA 1 (Newman) \u2014 Recall Process Reform", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Legislative Constitutional Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CA_SOS", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": "https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/ballot-measures/pdf/sca-1-24.pdf", "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "Recall Process Reform", "summary_text": "Would reform California's recall process by eliminating the simultaneous successor election that currently appears on recall ballots. Under the current system, voters decide both whether to recall an officer and who should replace them, allowing a replacement to be chosen by a slim plurality rather than majority support. If adopted, when a state officer is recalled, the office would be filled according to existing constitutional succession rules (such as the Lieutenant Governor becoming Governor), removing what supporters call political gamesmanship from the recall process.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-13 13:06:06.491689", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SCA 1 (Newman) \u2014 Recall Process Reform", "source": "CA_SOS", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Legislative Constitutional Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "CA SOS - Qualified Measures", "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/qualified-ballot-measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "CA SOS Eligible Measures", "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/initiative-and-referendum-status/eligible-statewide-initiative-measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "CA Legislature (Senate Constitutional Amendment)", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SCA1", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Ballot Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "Campaign Finance", "url": "https://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Measures/list.aspx?session=2025", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "Official Voter Guide", "url": "https://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "Voter's Edge CA", "url": "https://votersedge.org/ca", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}], "upcoming_scope": "statewide", "historical_context": {"matched_topic": "Government & Elections", "total_similar": 50, "pass_rate": 76.0, "avg_yes": 61.3, "median_yes": 63.6, "year_range": "1998-2024", "top_similar": [{"year": 2024, "county": "Alameda", "title": "This charter amendment replaces Alameda County's existing recall procedures f...", "percent_yes": 64.5, "passed": 1, "similarity": 63.0}, {"year": 2014, "county": "Alameda", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to conf", "percent_yes": 90.6, "passed": 1, "similarity": 58.0}, {"year": 2006, "county": "San Joaquin", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Stockton be amended to prov", "percent_yes": 66.6, "passed": 1, "similarity": 57.0}], "closest_races": [{"year": 2024, "county": "Shasta", "title": "SHASTA Measure R1", "percent_yes": 49.7, "passed": 0}, {"year": 2020, "county": "Santa Cruz", "title": "Shall Chris Krohn be recalled (removed) from the office of C", "percent_yes": 51.0, "passed": 1}, {"year": 2024, "county": "Riverside", "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure R1", "percent_yes": 51.1, "passed": 1}]}}, {"id": 1, "fingerprint": "2026|ACA 13 (WARD) VOTING THRESHOLDS. (RES. CH. 176, 20|Statewide|CA_SOS", "measure_fingerprint": "2026|ACA 13 (WARD) VOTING THRESHOLDS. (RES. CH. 176, 20|Statewide", "content_hash": "65bd83883914cfd3", "measure_id": "ACA 13 (Ward) Voting thresholds. (Res. Ch. 176, 20", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2026, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ACA 13 (Ward) \u2014 Protect and Retain the Majority Vote Act", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Legislative Constitutional Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CA_SOS", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": "https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/ballot-measures/pdf/aca-13.pdf", "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "Protect and Retain the Majority Vote Act", "summary_text": "Would require that ballot measures proposing to increase voting thresholds for future measures must themselves pass by the same increased threshold they seek to impose. Currently, a simple majority can pass a measure requiring supermajority votes for future actions, giving disproportionate power to a minority of voters. The measure aims to prevent abuse of the initiative process and protect local control by ensuring that statewide voters cannot easily override local decision-making with artificially high voting requirements.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 15:22:19.504788", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ACA 13 (Ward) \u2014 Protect and Retain the Majority Vote Act", "source": "CA_SOS", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Legislative Constitutional Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "CA SOS - Qualified Measures", "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/qualified-ballot-measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "CA SOS Eligible Measures", "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/initiative-and-referendum-status/eligible-statewide-initiative-measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "CA Legislature (Assembly Constitutional Amendment)", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260ACA13", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Ballot Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "Campaign Finance", "url": "https://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Measures/list.aspx?session=2025", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "Official Voter Guide", "url": "https://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "Voter's Edge CA", "url": "https://votersedge.org/ca", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}], "upcoming_scope": "statewide", "historical_context": {"matched_topic": "Government & Elections", "total_similar": 50, "pass_rate": 76.0, "avg_yes": 59.2, "median_yes": 61.0, "year_range": "1998-2024", "top_similar": [{"year": 2000, "county": "San Diego", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the people adopt an initiative measure, ", "percent_yes": 62.1, "passed": 1, "similarity": 58.0}, {"year": 2002, "county": "San Diego", "title": "AMENDS THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BY ADDING SECTIO", "percent_yes": 50.4, "passed": 1, "similarity": 51.0}, {"year": 2001, "county": "Santa Clara", "title": "Shall Section 601 of the City Charter be amended to change t", "percent_yes": 71.3, "passed": 1, "similarity": 51.0}], "closest_races": [{"year": 2022, "county": "Los Angeles", "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure VY", "percent_yes": 50.0, "passed": 0}, {"year": 2024, "county": "Shasta", "title": "SHASTA Measure P", "percent_yes": 49.8, "passed": 0}, {"year": 2002, "county": "San Diego", "title": "AMENDS THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BY ADDING SECTIO", "percent_yes": 50.4, "passed": 1}]}}, {"id": 10955, "fingerprint": "2025|PROP_50|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2025|PROP_50|Statewide", "content_hash": "15247d9146ced08a", "measure_id": "PROP_50", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2025, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 50, Use of Legislative Congressional Redistricting Map Amendment (2025)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The official ballot title was as follows:[46] \u201c Authorizes Temporary Changes to Congressional District Maps in Response to Texas' Partisan Redistricting. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.[47] \u201d The official ballot summary was as follows:[46]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7453339, "no_votes": 4116998, "total_votes": 11570337, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_50,_Use_of_Legislative_Congressional_Redistricting_Map_Amendment_(2025)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The official ballot title was as follows:[46]", "summary_text": "The official ballot summary was as follows:[46] \u201c In response to Texas' mid-decade partisan congressional redistricting, this measure temporarily requires new congressional district maps, as passed by the Legislature in August 2025, to be used in California's congressional elections through 2030. Retains California's independent Citizens Redistricting Commission and directs the Commission to resume enacting congressional district maps in 2031 after the 2030 census and every ten years thereafter. Establishes state policy supporting use of fair, independent, and nonpartisan redistricting commissions nationwide.[47] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:48.915408", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:48.915408", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:48.915408", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 50, Use of Legislative Congressional Redistricting Map Amendment (2025)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_50_(2025)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2025/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2025", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2050%202025", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2050%202025", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "historical_context": {"matched_topic": "Government & Elections", "total_similar": 50, "pass_rate": 80.0, "avg_yes": 63.5, "median_yes": 65.3, "year_range": "1998-2024", "top_similar": [{"year": 2020, "county": "Sacramento", "title": "This measure amended Sacramento's city charter to require the Sacramento Inde...", "percent_yes": 66.6, "passed": 1, "similarity": 66.0}, {"year": 2016, "county": "Alameda", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to prov", "percent_yes": 88.1, "passed": 1, "similarity": 66.0}, {"year": 2012, "county": "Los Angeles", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to prov", "percent_yes": 54.5, "passed": 1, "similarity": 64.0}], "closest_races": [{"year": 2020, "county": "San Diego", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall this Initiative be adopted for the purpos", "percent_yes": 49.0, "passed": 0}, {"year": 2000, "county": "Los Angeles", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to prov", "percent_yes": 48.6, "passed": 0}, {"year": 2016, "county": "Sacramento", "title": "Shall the City of Sacramento Charter be amended to establish", "percent_yes": 52.8, "passed": 1}]}}, {"id": 1370, "fingerprint": "2024|202400001|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400001|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "157e0231e0e86e39", "measure_id": "202400001", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Section 36(b) of the Charter of the County of Alameda be amended to change the notification period of each civil service examination from not less than 25 days to not less than 14 calendar days?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 167903, "no_votes": 114432, "total_votes": 282335, "percent_yes": 59.46942461968937, "percent_no": 40.53057538031063, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends the Alameda County Charter to reduce the required notifica...", "summary_text": "The measure amends the Alameda County Charter to reduce the required notification period for civil service examinations from at least 25 days to at least 14 calendar days.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 15:22:19.619289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.933206", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1380, "fingerprint": "2024|202400116|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400116|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8d7dc9c7efee2838", "measure_id": "202400116", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City's appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased to allow expenditure of the proceeds of City taxes and income from the investment of those taxes for fiscal years 2025 through 2028?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46394, "no_votes": 5888, "total_votes": 52282, "percent_yes": 88.73799778126315, "percent_no": 11.262002218736853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": "Revenues", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Alameda's constitutional spending limit to allow the c...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Alameda's constitutional spending limit to allow the city to spend tax revenues and investment income from those taxes for fiscal years 2025 through 2028.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.353667", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.953753", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1371, "fingerprint": "2024|202400002|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400002|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3a73ffe5c3e7b098", "measure_id": "202400002", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Section 62 of the County of Alameda Charter governing the recall of elective and appointive County officers be amended by replacing the current language, in its entirety, with \u201cCalifornia state law applicable to the recall of county officers shall govern the recall of County of Alameda elected officers\u201d?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 182200, "no_votes": 100483, "total_votes": 282683, "percent_yes": 64.45382283335043, "percent_no": 35.54617716664957, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment replaces Alameda County's existing recall procedures f...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment replaces Alameda County's existing recall procedures for elected and appointed county officers with California state law governing the recall of county officers, applying only to elected officials.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.313812", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.933601", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1381, "fingerprint": "2024|202400117|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400117|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "19f16e5a438fa80a", "measure_id": "202400117", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to use existing revenue to fund housing retention and homelessness prevention; modify certain grounds for eviction; remove rent control and registration exemptions for certain units; allow tenant associations and require owners to confer with them; limit the ways tenants can be charged for utilities; limit the maximum annual rent increase to 5%; eliminate suspension of rent controls during high vacancy; and require notice to new tenants of their rights, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29623, "no_votes": 23259, "total_votes": 52882, "percent_yes": 56.01717030369502, "percent_no": 43.98282969630498, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure uses existing revenue to fund housing retention and homelessness...", "summary_text": "This measure uses existing revenue to fund housing retention and homelessness prevention while implementing tenant protections including a 5% maximum annual rent increase cap, expanded rent control coverage, modified eviction grounds, and requirements for landlords to confer with tenant associations and provide utility charging limitations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.353963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.953900", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1375, "fingerprint": "2024|202400110|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400110|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5408b0d02e48c1e2", "measure_id": "202400110", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure to impose a special parcel tax on non-exempt property at $0.017 per lot square foot to repair and upgrade public sidewalks and pathways to improve safety and accessibility, replacing the existing special parcel tax imposed for sidewalk repair, subject to an annual consumer price index adjustment up to 3%, capped for larger parcels at a maximum $6,000 tax per parcel, providing an estimated $392,282 annually, until June 30, 2035, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6322, "no_votes": 2644, "total_votes": 8966, "percent_yes": 70.51081864822663, "percent_no": 29.489181351773368, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposes a special parcel tax of $0", "summary_text": "This measure imposes a special parcel tax of $0.017 per square foot on non-exempt property in Alameda to fund sidewalk and pathway repairs and upgrades, replacing an existing sidewalk repair tax. The tax is capped at $6,000 per parcel, includes annual cost-of-living adjustments up to 3%, and would generate an estimated $392,282 annually until June 30, 2035.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.351932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.952855", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1382, "fingerprint": "2024|202400118|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400118|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "774f0b7844f0167f", "measure_id": "202400118", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to use existing revenue to create a fund for rent payments to property owners on certain tenants' behalf; to expand exemptions from rent control and registration for certain single-family homes and two-unit properties; to allow property owners and tenants to agree to rent increases in exchange for services or amenities; to modify certain grounds for eviction; to allow tenants' associations; and to remove certain powers from the Rent Board, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18070, "no_votes": 33563, "total_votes": 51633, "percent_yes": 34.99699804388666, "percent_no": 65.00300195611334, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have created a fund using existing revenue to help pay ren...", "summary_text": "This measure would have created a fund using existing revenue to help pay rent to property owners on behalf of certain tenants, while also expanding exemptions from rent control for some single-family homes and two-unit properties and allowing negotiated rent increases in exchange for services. It would have modified eviction grounds, permitted tenant associations, and reduced certain powers of the Rent Board.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.354232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.954052", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1373, "fingerprint": "2024|202400108|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400108|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "eac703c742dfa893", "measure_id": "202400108", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure increasing the appropriations limit under Article XIIIB of t he California Constitution (which limits city expenditures of tax proceeds) to allow the City of Oakland to continue to expend revenues from taxes Oakland voters previously approved for emergency medical services, paramedic services, library services, public safety and violence prevention services, homeless services, children\u2019s services, parks and recreation, the Oakland Zoo and other lawful governmental purposes, without increasing or imposing new taxes, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59852, "no_votes": 19945, "total_votes": 79797, "percent_yes": 75.00532601476246, "percent_no": 24.99467398523754, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Oakland's spending limit under the California Constitu...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Oakland's spending limit under the California Constitution to allow the city to spend revenues from previously voter-approved taxes on services including emergency medical, library, public safety, homeless services, and parks without imposing new taxes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.351329", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.952528", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1383, "fingerprint": "2024|202400119|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400119|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b88f9e09a72eb46b", "measure_id": "202400119", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure DD", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure prohibiting the establishment within the City of Berkeley of facilities where livestock are kept for 45 days or more in a 12-month period and which meet size and other regulatory thresholds established by the Environmental Protection Agency; prohibiting the expansion of existing facilities; requiring existing facilities to cease operations within one year; establishing a penalty of $10,000 per violation per day; and allowing enforcement by the City Council or by private lawsuit, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30761, "no_votes": 18939, "total_votes": 49700, "percent_yes": 61.89336016096579, "percent_no": 38.10663983903421, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure prohibits the establishment of large-scale livestock facilities ...", "summary_text": "This measure prohibits the establishment of large-scale livestock facilities in Berkeley that meet EPA regulatory thresholds and house animals for 45+ days per year, while requiring existing facilities to cease operations within one year. The ordinance establishes $10,000 daily penalties for violations and allows enforcement through both city action and private lawsuits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.354527", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.954201", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure DD", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1401, "fingerprint": "2024|202400469|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400469|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e8cce82359f60267", "measure_id": "202400469", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support all Alameda students and maintain quality schools without increasing tax rates by attracting and retaining excellent teachers; sustaining strong academic programs in reading, writing, math, science, and arts; supporting struggling students; and preparing students for college/careers; shall an Alameda Unified School District measure levying $0.585/building area square foot capped at $15,998/ parcel, $598/unimproved parcel, be adopted, raising $24,000,000 annually for 9 years with senior exemptions, audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17280, "no_votes": 5412, "total_votes": 22692, "percent_yes": 76.15018508725542, "percent_no": 23.849814912744577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes Alameda Unified School District to levy a parcel tax o...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes Alameda Unified School District to levy a parcel tax of $0.585 per square foot of building area (capped at $15,998 per parcel) and $598 for unimproved parcels to raise approximately $24 million annually for nine years. The funds are designated for teacher retention, academic programs, student support services, and college/career preparation, with provisions for senior exemptions, audits, and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.468704", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.010244", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1384, "fingerprint": "2024|202400120|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400120|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ded1f3526c3dc039", "measure_id": "202400120", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure EE", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure creating a special parcel tax for the purposes of street and sidewalk repair, repaving and reconstruction, pedestrian safety projects, traffic-calming measures on bicycle boulevards, and environmental infrastructure, at a rate of $0.13 per square foot of improvements, which may be increased annually for inflation, generating approximately $10.5 million annually for 12 years, provided the City continues to fund street maintenance and repair at levels established in 2022, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23873, "no_votes": 28439, "total_votes": 52312, "percent_yes": 45.63580058112861, "percent_no": 54.36419941887139, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Maintenance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have created a special parcel tax of $0", "summary_text": "The measure would have created a special parcel tax of $0.13 per square foot of property improvements to fund street and sidewalk repairs, pedestrian safety projects, traffic-calming measures, and environmental infrastructure for 12 years, generating approximately $10.5 million annually. The tax rate could be increased annually for inflation, contingent on the city maintaining street maintenance funding at 2022 levels.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.354822", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.954353", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure EE", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1374, "fingerprint": "2024|202400109|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400109|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "139d722970e90e27", "measure_id": "202400109", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To increase funding for essential police, fire, and paramedic services, maintain parks, greenspaces, and public areas, and preserve recreation, public works, and community services, shall Ordinance 771 N.S. be adopted to renew the City of Piedmont\u2019s expiring four-year parcel tax with a twelve-year parcel tax with annual rates between $743 and $1,254 per single family residential parcel, $1,254 or $1,882 per commercial parcel, or $515 per multi-family dwelling unit, subject to CPI adjustment, raising approximately $3,272,000 annually?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3673, "no_votes": 1182, "total_votes": 4855, "percent_yes": 75.65396498455202, "percent_no": 24.34603501544798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews Piedmont's expiring four-year parcel tax with a twelve-ye...", "summary_text": "This measure renews Piedmont's expiring four-year parcel tax with a twelve-year parcel tax, charging annual rates of $743-$1,254 per single-family home, $515 per multi-family unit, and $1,254-$1,882 per commercial parcel to fund police, fire, paramedic services, parks, and other city services. The tax is subject to cost-of-living adjustments and would raise approximately $3.27 million annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.351659", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.952692", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1385, "fingerprint": "2024|202400121|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400121|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "238866f30c063bd6", "measure_id": "202400121", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure FF", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure creating a special parcel tax for the purposes of street, sidewalk, and pedestrian path repair, repaving, and reconstruction, safety improvements, and environmental infrastructure, at a rate of $0.17 per square foot of improvements to dwelling units and $0.25 per square foot of improvements to other property, which may be increased annually for inflation; and generating approximately $15 million annually for 14 years, provided other funding for street maintenance is maintained, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31942, "no_votes": 20547, "total_votes": 52489, "percent_yes": 60.85465526110233, "percent_no": 39.14534473889767, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Maintenance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure creates a special parcel tax of $0", "summary_text": "The measure creates a special parcel tax of $0.17 per square foot for residential improvements and $0.25 per square foot for other property improvements to fund street, sidewalk, and pedestrian path repairs, safety improvements, and environmental infrastructure. The tax may be adjusted annually for inflation and is expected to generate approximately $15 million annually for 14 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.355093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.954502", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure FF", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1402, "fingerprint": "2024|202400470|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400470|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "be560d683f28a765", "measure_id": "202400470", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain excellent schools by attracting and retaining exceptional teachers and counselors, protecting science, math, arts, reading and language instruction, supporting music, art and theater programs, and maintaining small class sizes, shall Albany Unified School District\u2019s measure renewing parcel tax authority at $0.55/building square foot and $25/unimproved parcel, be adopted, raising $4,800,000 annually that cannot be taken by the State, until ended by voters, with senior exemptions, annual adjustments, audits, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4651, "no_votes": 1247, "total_votes": 5898, "percent_yes": 78.85723974228553, "percent_no": 21.14276025771447, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews Albany Unified School District's parcel tax at $0", "summary_text": "This measure renews Albany Unified School District's parcel tax at $0.55 per building square foot and $25 per unimproved parcel, raising approximately $4.8 million annually for the district. The tax includes senior exemptions, annual adjustments, and audit requirements, with funds remaining local and continuing until ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.469023", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.010406", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1386, "fingerprint": "2024|202400122|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400122|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f2f548353ed3f6af", "measure_id": "202400122", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure GG", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure adopting a tax of $2.9647/therm of natural gas consumed annually in buildings of 15,000 square feet or larger except government buildings, single-family residences, and residential buildings with at least 50% affordable units, adjusted annually for inflation plus 6%; allocating revenues to building decarbonization programs, and administration; and establishing an oversight committee, generating an estimated $26.7 million the first year and more thereafter until its expiration in December 31, 2050, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16178, "no_votes": 36051, "total_votes": 52229, "percent_yes": 30.975128759884356, "percent_no": 69.02487124011564, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Environment", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a tax of $2", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a tax of $2.9647 per therm of natural gas consumed in large buildings (15,000+ square feet), with exemptions for government buildings, single-family homes, and certain affordable housing. The tax revenue would have funded building decarbonization programs through 2050, with the rate increasing annually by inflation plus 6%.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.355391", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.954654", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure GG", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1403, "fingerprint": "2024|202400471|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400471|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "dc275b916f34aa03", "measure_id": "202400471", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue high-quality public education, provide support for struggling students, attract and retain quality teachers, keep school libraries open, support music/arts programs, and other designated purposes, shall Berkeley Unified School District renew its expiring special tax at $0.54/building square foot or $25/unimproved parcel, with annual adjustments, low- income exemptions, independent citizen/auditor oversight, generating approximately $44,000,000 annually in local funds for Berkeley public schools for 8 years that cannot be taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29418, "no_votes": 3913, "total_votes": 33331, "percent_yes": 88.26017821247487, "percent_no": 11.73982178752513, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure renews an expiring special tax for Berkeley Unified School Distri...", "summary_text": "The measure renews an expiring special tax for Berkeley Unified School District at $0.54 per building square foot or $25 per unimproved parcel for 8 years, generating approximately $44 million annually for local school operations including teacher retention, libraries, and arts programs. The tax includes annual adjustments, low-income exemptions, and independent oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.469292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.010570", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1387, "fingerprint": "2024|202400123|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400123|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d446c3dc275494e8", "measure_id": "202400123", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure HH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure setting new indoor air quality standards for City-owned and -leased buildings; prohibiting compliance with those standards through the use of air filtration or disinfection technologies emitting ozone, volatile organic compounds, oxidation byproducts, excessive sound, or ultraviolet light; requiring repair, closure, evacuation, and/or provision of alternative services to the public due to building closure when standards are not met; and creating a private right to sue over alleged violations, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22205, "no_votes": 28903, "total_votes": 51108, "percent_yes": 43.44720983016357, "percent_no": 56.55279016983643, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Environment", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established new indoor air quality standards for Alam...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established new indoor air quality standards for Alameda city buildings while prohibiting certain air filtration technologies, and would have required building repairs, closures, or evacuations when standards weren't met. It also would have allowed private lawsuits for alleged violations of these air quality requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.355688", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.954808", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure HH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1404, "fingerprint": "2024|202400472|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400472|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9be246c6fdec013b", "measure_id": "202400472", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade aging local classrooms, labs, career training facilities, learning technology, art/ music classrooms, fields; improve earthquake/ fire safety/ emergency communications/ school security; improve accessibility for students with disabilities; update plumbing/ electrical/ heating/ cooling systems, shall Hayward Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $550,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising approximately $35,200,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight/ all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14151, "no_votes": 7778, "total_votes": 21929, "percent_yes": 64.53098636508733, "percent_no": 35.46901363491267, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Hayward Unified School District to issue $550 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Hayward Unified School District to issue $550 million in bonds to fund facility upgrades including classroom improvements, safety enhancements, accessibility modifications, and infrastructure updates. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating about $35.2 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.469597", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.010721", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1392, "fingerprint": "2024|202400128|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400128|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9d58e7fc555873b2", "measure_id": "202400128", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure II", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the Open Space Initiative of 2014, at no cost to taxpayers, allowing Dublin to accept land donation to connect Dublin Boulevard 1.5 miles east to North Canyons Parkway, including bike lanes, pedestrian access, improved 911 response/traffic flow, and preserve 100 acres of open space while maintaining voter approved housing development restrictions, in exchange for potential limited commercial development on the adjacent 80 acres?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13649, "no_votes": 12052, "total_votes": 25701, "percent_yes": 53.106883000661455, "percent_no": 46.893116999338545, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Open Space", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends Dublin's 2014 Open Space Initiative to allow the city to a...", "summary_text": "The measure amends Dublin's 2014 Open Space Initiative to allow the city to accept a land donation that would extend Dublin Boulevard 1.5 miles east to North Canyons Parkway with bike lanes and pedestrian access, while preserving 100 acres of open space in exchange for allowing potential limited commercial development on an adjacent 80-acre area. The ordinance maintains existing voter-approved housing development restrictions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.357223", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.955548", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure II", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1405, "fingerprint": "2024|202400473|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400473|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fdec37f92decac26", "measure_id": "202400473", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With no incrase in current estimated tax rates, shall San Leandro Unified School District\u2019s measure to renovate/construct classrooms; repair roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems; remove hazardous materials; and construct below-market rental housing to attract/retain teachers/staff be adopted, authorizing $174 million of bonds with levies averaging $37.28 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $12 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, legal interest rates, citizen oversight/independent audits, and funds that cannot be taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7784, "no_votes": 4554, "total_votes": 12338, "percent_yes": 63.08964175717296, "percent_no": 36.91035824282704, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the San Leandro Unified School District to issue $174 ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the San Leandro Unified School District to issue $174 million in bonds to renovate and construct classrooms, repair building systems, remove hazardous materials, and build below-market rental housing for teachers and staff. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging $37.28 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $12 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.469949", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.010885", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1393, "fingerprint": "2024|202400129|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400129|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9c95d401a26f65a7", "measure_id": "202400129", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure JJ", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Dublin Municipal Code be amended to prohibit councilmembers and commissioners from accepting gifts from lobbyists and city contractors; prohibit lobbyists from sitting on City commissions; impose a combined term limit of 12 years for the Mayor and/or City Councilmembers, while retaining existing term limits for the current Mayor and City Councilmembers; and require posting of all City contracts on the City's website for public review?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19350, "no_votes": 6095, "total_votes": 25445, "percent_yes": 76.04637453330713, "percent_no": 23.95362546669287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Dublin's Municipal Code to prohibit councilmembers and co...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Dublin's Municipal Code to prohibit councilmembers and commissioners from accepting gifts from lobbyists and city contractors, bars lobbyists from serving on city commissions, establishes a 12-year combined term limit for mayor and city council positions, and requires all city contracts to be posted online for public review.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.357522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.955697", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure JJ", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1394, "fingerprint": "2024|202400130|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400130|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "59b007835d0a5ba6", "measure_id": "202400130", "measure_letter": "K1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure K1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue providing essential City of Hayward services, including firefighting, emergency-medical response, police protection, pothole repair, street improvements, general City maintenance, and modernization of aging City facilities, including for police, public works, and South Hayward community and library services; shall a City of Hayward measure to continue (without increasing) an existing half-cent sales tax for 20 years, providing $20,000,000 annually that cannot be taken by the State, requiring annual audits and public disclosure, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38826, "no_votes": 7881, "total_votes": 46707, "percent_yes": 83.12672618665296, "percent_no": 16.87327381334704, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.357792", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.955848", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure K1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1406, "fingerprint": "2024|202400476|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400476|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "19661a83fafc7dd5", "measure_id": "202400476", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve and construct safe, modern classrooms, restrooms, and community and arts facilities; renovate cafeterias/dining areas, and outdoor spaces; replace outdated portables with new classrooms; update aging electrical, heating/cooling systems, and roofs; shall Albany Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $63,800,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising approximately $4,210,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6408, "no_votes": 2465, "total_votes": 8873, "percent_yes": 72.21909162628198, "percent_no": 27.78090837371802, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Albany Unified School District to issue $63,800,000 i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Albany Unified School District to issue $63,800,000 in bonds to improve and construct school facilities including classrooms, restrooms, cafeterias, and arts facilities, as well as update infrastructure systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising about $4,210,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.470910", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.011341", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1395, "fingerprint": "2024|202400131|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400131|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9163e5943e6b2e1c", "measure_id": "202400131", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure LL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain local services/facilities, such as: repairing potholes/city streets; replacing seismically unsafe fire stations; maintaining neighborhood police patrols, 9-1-1 and emergency medical response/fire protection; and for general government use; shall the City of Newark measure be adopted increasing the existing voter approved transient occupancy (hotel) tax from 10% to 14%, paid only by hotel/lodging guests, until ended by voters, providing $2,100,000 more annually, that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including independent citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12721, "no_votes": 3093, "total_votes": 15814, "percent_yes": 80.4413810547616, "percent_no": 19.558618945238393, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Newark's transient occupancy tax on hotel guests from ...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Newark's transient occupancy tax on hotel guests from 10% to 14%, generating an estimated $2.1 million annually for city services including street repairs, fire station improvements, and emergency services. The tax increase continues indefinitely unless ended by voters and includes independent citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.358282", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.955999", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure LL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1407, "fingerprint": "2024|202400477|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400477|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b9579bec25801255", "measure_id": "202400477", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade local schools by updating classrooms/science labs/classroom technology/equipment; replacing leaking roofs; replacing outdated, aging/deteriorating portables with permanent classrooms; acquiring, constructing, repairing classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment; and replacing inefficient HVAC, electrical/plumbing systems with updated sustainable systems; shall Fremont Unified School District's measure authorizing $919,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 4.9(cents sign)/$100 assessed value ($63,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizen oversight/audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48882, "no_votes": 27183, "total_votes": 76065, "percent_yes": 64.26345888384934, "percent_no": 35.73654111615066, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Fremont Unified School District to issue $919 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Fremont Unified School District to issue $919 million in bonds to fund school facility repairs and upgrades, including classroom improvements, roof replacements, HVAC system updates, and replacement of portable classrooms with permanent structures. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.471208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.011491", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1396, "fingerprint": "2024|202400132|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400132|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "552f37c1dafa0c94", "measure_id": "202400132", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure MM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure levying a special tax for 20 years in the \"Wildfire Prevention Zone\" (defined in the measure), to prevent wildfires by implementing City of Oakland prevention plans, including vegetation management, evacuation route protection, enhanced fire patrols during high danger periods, and goat grazing at annual rates of $99/single-family parcel, $65/condominium/multifamily unit; nonresidential parcels based on a formula, generating $2,670,000 in 2025-26, with cost of living increases, citizens' oversight and audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25125, "no_votes": 10150, "total_votes": 35275, "percent_yes": 71.22608079376329, "percent_no": 28.773919206236712, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies a special property tax for 20 years in Alameda's designat...", "summary_text": "This measure levies a special property tax for 20 years in Alameda's designated \"Wildfire Prevention Zone\" to fund wildfire prevention activities including vegetation management, evacuation route protection, fire patrols, and goat grazing. The tax rates are $99 annually for single-family parcels and $65 for condominium/multifamily units, with nonresidential parcels taxed based on a formula, generating an estimated $2,670,000 in the first year.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.358801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.956147", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure MM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1408, "fingerprint": "2024|202400478|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400478|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a8ca49a90567fb8b", "measure_id": "202400478", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade local schools, including classrooms/labs for science, technology, engineering, math, reading/writing; improving campus safety/security; replacing aging roofs, heating/cooling systems, restrooms/plumbing, shall New Haven Unified School District's measure authorizing $272,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, at average levies of $60 per $100,000 assessed value (approximately $17,200,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17909, "no_votes": 8617, "total_votes": 26526, "percent_yes": 67.51489105029029, "percent_no": 32.48510894970971, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the New Haven Unified School District in Alameda Coun...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the New Haven Unified School District in Alameda County to issue $272 million in bonds to repair and upgrade local schools, including STEM classrooms, safety systems, and infrastructure like roofs and HVAC systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.471505", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.011642", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1397, "fingerprint": "2024|202400133|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400133|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "55e51d0b5ac0b45e", "measure_id": "202400133", "measure_letter": "NN", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure NN", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to: (1) fund Citywide violence reduction services, such as 9-1-1 dispatch, community policing, mobile crisis responders, and violence interruption, and (2) increase police and fire minimum staffing, by extending and increasing both the existing parking tax surcharge to 10% and the existing parcel tax to $198 annually for single-family parcels, and other parcels as specified, with exemptions and reductions, for 9 years, raising approximately $47,400,000 annually, with oversight and auditing, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 112971, "no_votes": 46602, "total_votes": 159573, "percent_yes": 70.79581132146416, "percent_no": 29.204188678535843, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends and increases Alameda's existing parking tax surcharge t...", "summary_text": "This measure extends and increases Alameda's existing parking tax surcharge to 10% and parcel tax to $198 annually for single-family parcels for 9 years to raise approximately $47.4 million annually. The funds would support violence reduction services including 911 dispatch, community policing, mobile crisis responders, violence interruption programs, and increased minimum staffing for police and fire departments.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.359095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.956295", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure NN", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1409, "fingerprint": "2024|202400479|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400479|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0e6a75a6c4213716", "measure_id": "202400479", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update schools for 21st century learning, classrooms/labs for science, technology, engineering, arts and math instruction; technology infrastructure, HVAC, electrical/plumbing systems; and school security/emergency preparedness; shall Newark Unified School District's measure authorizing $205,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, with average levies of $50 per $100,000 assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, generating approximately $14,000,000 annually, extending not increasing estimated tax rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits and no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10616, "no_votes": 5081, "total_votes": 15697, "percent_yes": 67.63075746958017, "percent_no": 32.369242530419825, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Newark Unified School District to issue $205 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Newark Unified School District to issue $205 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including science and technology classrooms, infrastructure upgrades, and security enhancements, financed through property tax levies of approximately $50 per $100,000 of assessed value. The measure passed with 70.7% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.471773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.011795", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1398, "fingerprint": "2024|202400134|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400134|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "37707d678319399e", "measure_id": "202400134", "measure_letter": "OO", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure OO", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure amending the City Charter and Oakland Municipal Code to, among other things, revise qualifications and restrictions for service and removal procedures, specify the vote threshold for action and increase minimum staffing requirements for the Public Ethics Commission; allow the Commission to set City Attorney and City Auditor salaries biannually rather than annually; and amend the Lobbyist Registration Act to restrict payments and expenses incurred by local government lobbyists, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 110317, "no_votes": 40186, "total_votes": 150503, "percent_yes": 73.29887111884813, "percent_no": 26.701128881151874, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Alameda's City Charter and Municipal Code to revise quali...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Alameda's City Charter and Municipal Code to revise qualifications, removal procedures, and staffing requirements for the Public Ethics Commission, allows the Commission to set City Attorney and City Auditor salaries every two years instead of annually, and adds restrictions on payments and expenses for local government lobbyists. The measure passed with 70.7% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.359446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.956443", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure OO", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1410, "fingerprint": "2024|202400480|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400480|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "841580dc167d0304", "measure_id": "202400480", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers and educational support staff and continue funding advanced academic programs, shall Piedmont Unified School District's measure renewing the school parcel tax for 8 years be adopted at the rate of 50 cents per square foot of building improvements, providing 5 million dollars in annual school funding, with independent citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5684, "no_votes": 1327, "total_votes": 7011, "percent_yes": 81.0726001996862, "percent_no": 18.927399800313793, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews Piedmont Unified School District's parcel tax for 8 years...", "summary_text": "This measure renews Piedmont Unified School District's parcel tax for 8 years at a rate of 50 cents per square foot of building improvements, generating approximately $5 million annually for the district. The funds would support teacher and staff compensation and advanced academic programs, with independent citizen oversight and local control of the money.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.472081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.011945", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1399, "fingerprint": "2024|202400136|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400136|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "211576e81f99a252", "measure_id": "202400136", "measure_letter": "PP", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure PP", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain city services and minimize cuts, such as police and fire protection; 911 emergency response; disaster preparedness; pedestrian safety; park maintenance; pothole repair and street maintenance; recreation programs; open space preservation; and other general government uses; shall the City of Pleasanton's measure to establish a half-cent sales tax, providing approximately $10,000,000 annually for 10 years, keeping all funds local, with annual audits, public spending disclosure, and oversight, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15983, "no_votes": 18897, "total_votes": 34880, "percent_yes": 45.82282110091743, "percent_no": 54.17717889908257, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.360100", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.956752", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure PP", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1412, "fingerprint": "2024|202400482|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400482|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6a970d537a3de44e", "measure_id": "202400482", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize/construct classrooms and school facilities; make health, safety and security improvements; upgrade deteriorating plumbing, sewer, and irrigation systems; upgrade outdated technology infrastructure; and replace aging heating and ventilation systems; shall the measure authorizing San Lorenzo Unified School District to issue $195,000,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating on average $12,400,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $60 per $100,000 assessed value, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15832, "no_votes": 7990, "total_votes": 23822, "percent_yes": 66.45957518260431, "percent_no": 33.54042481739569, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes San Lorenzo Unified School District to issue $195 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes San Lorenzo Unified School District to issue $195 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, upgrade infrastructure systems including plumbing and HVAC, improve technology, and enhance health and safety features at school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating an average of $12.4 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.472659", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.012262", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1400, "fingerprint": "2024|202400137|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400137|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0a60bea49d982b5f", "measure_id": "202400137", "measure_letter": "QQ", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure QQ", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect essential city services such as 9-1-1 emergency response; street/pothole repair; crime/gun violence prevention; fire protection/paramedics; neighborhood police patrols, and reducing blight/keeping neighborhoods clean, shall the measure be adopted amending Union City's business license ordinance, lowering many small businesses' taxes, with rates up to 0.25% of gross receipts (as described in the ordinance) until ended by voters, raising $3,500,000 annually, with public spending disclosure/independent audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20249, "no_votes": 4560, "total_votes": 24809, "percent_yes": 81.61957354185981, "percent_no": 18.380426458140192, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Union City's business license ordinance to implement a gr...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Union City's business license ordinance to implement a gross receipts tax of up to 0.25% on businesses while lowering taxes for many small businesses, generating approximately $3.5 million annually for city services including emergency response, street repair, crime prevention, fire protection, and neighborhood maintenance. The tax would continue until voters decide to end it and includes requirements for public spending disclosure and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.360373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.956903", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure QQ", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10969, "fingerprint": "2024|202400111|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400111|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d54e647b92d7f7b2", "measure_id": "202400111", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund local tenant rental assistance programs, residential rental code enforcement, legal assistance for tenants and landlords, and to support rental providers to avoid financial hardship, shall a measure establishing a supplemental special business license tax on residential rental businesses of 0.36% of gross receipts for renting four or fewer units in the City and 1% of gross receipts for renting five or more units, providing approximately $475,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4216, "no_votes": 4640, "total_votes": 8856, "percent_yes": 47.60614272809395, "percent_no": 52.39385727190605, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Housing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a supplemental business license tax on res...", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a supplemental business license tax on residential rental properties in Alameda, with rates of 0.36% of gross receipts for landlords renting four or fewer units and 1% for those renting five or more units. The tax revenue, estimated at approximately $475,000 annually, would have funded tenant rental assistance programs, rental code enforcement, legal assistance for both tenants and landlords, and support for rental providers facing financial hardship.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.041984", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.352227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.953006", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10971, "fingerprint": "2024|202400474|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400474|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "95f09cbd99d5ae4b", "measure_id": "202400474", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure R1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall RYAN JERGENSEN be recalled (removed) from the office of Sunol Glen Unified School District Governing Board Member, Full Term?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 277, "no_votes": 255, "total_votes": 532, "percent_yes": 52.06766917293233, "percent_no": 47.93233082706767, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Ryan Jergensen from his po...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Ryan Jergensen from his position as a member of the Sunol Glen Unified School District Governing Board. The measure passed, resulting in Jergensen's removal from the school board.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-07-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.048041", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.470325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.011047", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure R1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10972, "fingerprint": "2024|202400475|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400475|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6c5ab7f4f3508bc3", "measure_id": "202400475", "measure_letter": "R2", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure R2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall LINDA E. HURLEY be recalled (removed) from the office of Sunol Glen Unified School District Governing Board Member, Short Term?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 274, "no_votes": 258, "total_votes": 532, "percent_yes": 51.50375939849624, "percent_no": 48.49624060150376, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would recall Linda E", "summary_text": "This measure would recall Linda E. Hurley from her position as a member of the Sunol Glen Unified School District Governing Board. The measure passed, removing her from the short-term board position.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-07-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.048228", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.470639", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.011195", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure R2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1372, "fingerprint": "2024|202400003|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400003|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b492dc91686fbc2a", "measure_id": "202400003", "measure_letter": "R3", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure R3", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Pamela Price be recalled (removed) from the office of District Attorney?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 375442, "no_votes": 221285, "total_votes": 596727, "percent_yes": 62.91687823745197, "percent_no": 37.08312176254803, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Pamela Price from her posi...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Pamela Price from her position as District Attorney of Alameda County. The measure passed, resulting in Price's removal from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.314082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.934000", "update_count": 8, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure R3", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10970, "fingerprint": "2024|202400135|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400135|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f39d50b934c2728b", "measure_id": "202400135", "measure_letter": "R4", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure R4", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Sheng Thao be recalled (removed) from the office of mayor?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86535, "no_votes": 56220, "total_votes": 142755, "percent_yes": 60.61784175685615, "percent_no": 39.38215824314385, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Sheng Thao from her positi...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Sheng Thao from her position as mayor of Oakland (located in Alameda County). The measure passed, resulting in Thao's removal from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.046548", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.359808", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.956598", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure R4", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1376, "fingerprint": "2024|202400112|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400112|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b285d9cb7d06486d", "measure_id": "202400112", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter of Albany be amended to delegate the authority to appoint City officers and department heads from the City Council to the City Manager, except for the City Attorney, who would still be appointed by the City Council, and delegate authority for organizing the City to the City Manager?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5508, "no_votes": 2766, "total_votes": 8274, "percent_yes": 66.56997824510515, "percent_no": 33.43002175489485, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure delegates authority to appoint most city officers and department ...", "summary_text": "The measure delegates authority to appoint most city officers and department heads from the City Council to the City Manager, while keeping City Attorney appointments with the City Council. It also gives the City Manager authority for organizing the city's structure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.352549", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.953157", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1377, "fingerprint": "2024|202400113|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400113|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ab9cd35d8d46133c", "measure_id": "202400113", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter of Albany be amended to eliminate the requirement that officers as determined by the City Council execute a bond before entering upon their official duties?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5793, "no_votes": 2377, "total_votes": 8170, "percent_yes": 70.90575275397796, "percent_no": 29.094247246022036, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure amends Albany's City Charter to remove the requirement th...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure amends Albany's City Charter to remove the requirement that certain city officers, as designated by the City Council, must execute a bond before beginning their official duties. The measure eliminates this bonding requirement from the city's governing document.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.352843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.953305", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1378, "fingerprint": "2024|202400114|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400114|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "53c290e79ae75f9d", "measure_id": "202400114", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter of Albany be amended to remove the exception for school purpose bonds from the City's bonding limit and clarify that the City's bonding limit is the lesser of (i) 15% of the assessed valuation of the property in the City subject to direct taxation or (ii) the statutory maximum amount?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5697, "no_votes": 2262, "total_votes": 7959, "percent_yes": 71.5793441387109, "percent_no": 28.420655861289106, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment removes the exception that allowed school bonds to exc...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment removes the exception that allowed school bonds to exceed Albany's debt limit and clarifies that the city's bonding limit is the lesser of 15% of assessed property value or the state's statutory maximum. The change means all municipal bonds, including those for school purposes, must now comply with the city's overall debt ceiling.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.353109", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.953452", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1379, "fingerprint": "2024|202400115|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400115|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "26e69c43955b01d1", "measure_id": "202400115", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter of Albany be amended to allow Albany residents to vote for local candidates and ballot measures in municipal and school district elections if they are U.S. citizens, at least 16 years old and registered to vote, once the City Council and School Board, respectively, determine that including 16- and 17-year old voters in such elections will be cost-effective and feasible, and to repeal older Charter language about former elected officers?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5619, "no_votes": 3148, "total_votes": 8767, "percent_yes": 64.09262005246948, "percent_no": 35.907379947530515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Albany's City Charter to allow 16- and 17-year-old U", "summary_text": "This measure amended Albany's City Charter to allow 16- and 17-year-old U.S. citizens to vote in municipal and school district elections, contingent on the City Council and School Board determining such participation is cost-effective and feasible. The measure also repealed outdated Charter language regarding former elected officers.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.353376", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.953603", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1388, "fingerprint": "2024|202400124|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400124|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "868146daac5c467b", "measure_id": "202400124", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure effective January 1, 2027, setting the existing general tax on transfers of real property at 2.5% of a property's value for properties valued $1.6M or higher, and increasing the rate from 2.5% to 3% for properties valued $1.9M or higher and from 3% to 3.5% for properties valued $3.0M or higher, adjusted annually for increases in value; removing January 1, 2029 expiration date; generating an estimated additional $2M - $4M annually, until repealed, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31461, "no_votes": 20169, "total_votes": 51630, "percent_yes": 60.93550261475886, "percent_no": 39.06449738524114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure makes permanent Alameda's existing 2", "summary_text": "This measure makes permanent Alameda's existing 2.5% transfer tax on real property sales of $1.6 million or higher, increases the rate to 3% for properties valued at $1.9 million or higher and 3.5% for properties valued at $3.0 million or higher, and removes the January 1, 2029 expiration date. The measure is estimated to generate an additional $2-4 million annually for the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.355979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.954956", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1389, "fingerprint": "2024|202400125|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400125|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "97f4d6054cd9fc6d", "measure_id": "202400125", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure creating a special parcel tax to maintain Berkeley Public Library facilities and services, prioritizing neighborhood libraries, weekend and evening hours, diverse collections, and youth, educational and other programs, at $0.06 per square foot of improvements for dwelling units, and $0.09 per square foot for other properties, generating $5,600,000 annually until repealed, in addition to the current library tax of $0.28 per square foot for dwelling units and $0.4233 for other properties, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41819, "no_votes": 11423, "total_votes": 53242, "percent_yes": 78.54513354118929, "percent_no": 21.454866458810713, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure creates an additional special parcel tax for Berkeley Public Lib...", "summary_text": "This measure creates an additional special parcel tax for Berkeley Public Library facilities and services at $0.06 per square foot for residential properties and $0.09 per square foot for other properties, generating approximately $5.6 million annually. The tax is in addition to the existing library tax and would fund neighborhood libraries, extended hours, collections, and various programs until repealed.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.356284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.955104", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1390, "fingerprint": "2024|202400126|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400126|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3363c1a046150ee6", "measure_id": "202400126", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure increasing the rate of the City's special parcel tax for parks, trees and landscaping maintenance from $0.221 to $0.2652 per square foot of taxable improvements, adjusted annually for inflation, exempting very low-income property owners as defined by the City Council, estimated to generate an additional approximately $3.8 million annually for a total of approximately $22 million annually, and effective until amended or repealed by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39508, "no_votes": 13028, "total_votes": 52536, "percent_yes": 75.20176640779655, "percent_no": 24.798233592203445, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Maintenance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Alameda's special parcel tax for parks, trees and land...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Alameda's special parcel tax for parks, trees and landscaping maintenance from $0.221 to $0.2652 per square foot of taxable improvements, with annual inflation adjustments and exemptions for very low-income property owners. The increase is estimated to generate an additional $3.8 million annually for a total of approximately $22 million per year for parks and landscaping maintenance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.356580", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.955252", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1391, "fingerprint": "2024|202400127|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400127|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "facb77814b833913", "measure_id": "202400127", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to remove the current January 1, 2027 expiration date and extend until ended by voters the general tax on the distribution of sugary drinks and sweeteners, paid by distributors at the rate of 1(cents sign) per fluid ounce, previously approved by voters in 2014, with exceptions for small retailers, milk products, and baby formula, raising approximately $1,150,000 per year for general government use, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42280, "no_votes": 10649, "total_votes": 52929, "percent_yes": 79.8805947590168, "percent_no": 20.1194052409832, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure removes the January 1, 2027 expiration date on Alameda's existin...", "summary_text": "This measure removes the January 1, 2027 expiration date on Alameda's existing 1-cent per fluid ounce tax on sugary drinks and sweeteners paid by distributors, making the tax permanent until voters decide to end it. The tax, which excludes small retailers, milk products, and baby formula, is estimated to generate approximately $1,150,000 annually for general government purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.356849", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.955400", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1411, "fingerprint": "2024|202400481|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400481|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "bbe3eefe15a3c149", "measure_id": "202400481", "measure_letter": "\u200bK", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure \u200bK", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local community college classrooms/labs/access for nursing/vocational career training, student safety; remove asbestos, lead paint, mold; ensure safe drinking water; repair deteriorating sewers, roofs; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, sites, facilities, equipment; shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1's measure authorizing $598,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $16 per $100,000 assessed valuation, generating $34,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring local control, oversight, audits, spending disclosure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37, "no_votes": 40, "total_votes": 77, "percent_yes": 48.05194805194805, "percent_no": 51.94805194805195, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized $598 million in bonds for the San Joaquin ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized $598 million in bonds for the San Joaquin Delta Community College District to fund facility improvements including classroom and lab construction, safety upgrades, asbestos and lead paint removal, and infrastructure repairs. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of $16 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating approximately $34.8 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.472389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.012097", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure \u200bK", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1413, "fingerprint": "2024|202400004|ALPINE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400004|ALPINE", "content_hash": "576c021caa5f187c", "measure_id": "202400004", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Alpine", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALPINE Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "For the sole purpose of supporting Alpine County\u2019s General Fund, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the \u2018hotel/motel\u2019 tax rate upon visitors of vacation home rentals, hotels, motels, and similar facilities in Alpine County from 10% to 14% of rent charged to the visitor, providing approximately an additional $400,000 annually for the General Fund until repealed?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 488, "no_votes": 232, "total_votes": 720, "percent_yes": 67.77777777777779, "percent_no": 32.222222222222214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Alpine County's transient occupancy tax on hotels, mot...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Alpine County's transient occupancy tax on hotels, motels, vacation rentals, and similar facilities from 10% to 14% of the rent charged to visitors. The increase is expected to generate approximately $400,000 annually for the county's General Fund.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.314381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.934347", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALPINE Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alpine_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1415, "fingerprint": "2024|202400138|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400138|AMADOR", "content_hash": "50cc76e6f505612b", "measure_id": "202400138", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "AMADOR Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "For the sole purpose of transportation improvements in Amador City, and to qualify for funding from the California Department of Transportation\u2019s Local Partnership Formulaic Program, shall the measure adopting a quarter of a cent sales tax for a period of ten years be adopted in Amador City?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 77, "no_votes": 13, "total_votes": 90, "percent_yes": 85.55555555555556, "percent_no": 14.444444444444443, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopts a 0", "summary_text": "This measure adopts a 0.25% sales tax in Amador City for ten years to fund transportation improvements and qualify for matching state transportation funding through California's Local Partnership Formulaic Program.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.360674", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.957053", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMADOR Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1416, "fingerprint": "2024|202400139|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400139|AMADOR", "content_hash": "2d18a92085184602", "measure_id": "202400139", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "AMADOR Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1149, "no_votes": 1602, "total_votes": 2751, "percent_yes": 41.76663031624864, "percent_no": 58.23336968375136, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.360982", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.957216", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMADOR Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1417, "fingerprint": "2024|202400140|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400140|AMADOR", "content_hash": "f8bab5989d536cbb", "measure_id": "202400140", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "AMADOR Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of Plymouth City Treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 387, "no_votes": 213, "total_votes": 600, "percent_yes": 64.5, "percent_no": 35.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the Plymouth City Treasurer position from an elected off...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the Plymouth City Treasurer position from an elected office to one appointed by the city government.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.361323", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.957363", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMADOR Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1418, "fingerprint": "2024|202400141|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400141|AMADOR", "content_hash": "e1bbaae6d510da64", "measure_id": "202400141", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "AMADOR Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of Plymouth City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 387, "no_votes": 213, "total_votes": 600, "percent_yes": 64.5, "percent_no": 35.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows the Plymouth City Clerk position to be appointed rather t...", "summary_text": "This measure allows the Plymouth City Clerk position to be appointed rather than elected. The measure passed, changing the selection method for this municipal office from a voter election to an appointment process.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.361621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.957509", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMADOR Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1419, "fingerprint": "2024|202400142|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400142|AMADOR", "content_hash": "e794d758fdc8742a", "measure_id": "202400142", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "AMADOR Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide locally controlled funding for Sutter Creek essential services such as repairing roads, potholes and storm drains; maintaining rapid emergency response/ police patrols; preventing wildfires; and for general government purposes, shall the City of Sutter Creek\u2019s measure be adopted establishing a 1% sales tax paid by residents and visitors, exempting essential purchases like groceries/ prescription medicine, providing approximately $579,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1041, "no_votes": 506, "total_votes": 1547, "percent_yes": 67.29153199741435, "percent_no": 32.70846800258565, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1% sales tax in Sutter Creek to fund local service...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1% sales tax in Sutter Creek to fund local services including road repairs, emergency response, police patrols, and wildfire prevention, with exemptions for groceries and prescription medicine. The tax is estimated to generate approximately $579,000 annually and includes requirements for public spending disclosure and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.361939", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.957656", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMADOR Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1414, "fingerprint": "2024|202400005|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400005|AMADOR", "content_hash": "2e5b9698216ccd94", "measure_id": "202400005", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "AMADOR Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a 3/4-cent (0.75%) sales tax on retail transactions in the unincorporated area of the County for a ten\u00ad year period, providing approximately $3.4 million annually to be used solely for the repair, maintenance and improvement of local county roads?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5852, "no_votes": 7831, "total_votes": 13683, "percent_yes": 42.76839874296572, "percent_no": 57.23160125703428, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.314685", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.934714", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMADOR Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1429, "fingerprint": "2024|202400484|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400484|BUTTE", "content_hash": "dd564437a0ca2692", "measure_id": "202400484", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of Biggs school facilities; replace leaky roofs; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall the Biggs Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $16,500,000 of bonds, at legal rates, raising on average $988,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for administrator salaries and all money spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 875, "no_votes": 667, "total_votes": 1542, "percent_yes": 56.744487678339816, "percent_no": 43.255512321660184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Biggs Unified School District to issue $16", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Biggs Unified School District to issue $16.5 million in bonds to repair roofs, construct and modernize classrooms and restrooms, and make health and safety improvements to school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising an average of $988,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.473263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.012566", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1431, "fingerprint": "2024|202400486|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400486|BUTTE", "content_hash": "ac7188dbcda93e0f", "measure_id": "202400486", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace portables with permanent classrooms; and upgrade agriculture career technical education facilities; shall Durham Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $24,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $1,400,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding from levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all funds benefiting Durham Schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1500, "no_votes": 1103, "total_votes": 2603, "percent_yes": 57.62581636573185, "percent_no": 42.37418363426815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Durham Unified School District to issue $24", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Durham Unified School District to issue $24.5 million in bonds to modernize classrooms and facilities, replace portable buildings with permanent structures, and upgrade career technical education facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.473845", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.012892", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1430, "fingerprint": "2024|202400485|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400485|BUTTE", "content_hash": "b086cca69e37b695", "measure_id": "202400485", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local school classrooms for math, reading, writing, science, workforce training; replace/ repair leaky roofs, windows, plumbing, heating, cooling; update school safety; expand facilities for elementary schools and reading/ literacy programs; shall Chico Unified School District\u2019s measure issuing $239,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, levying an average $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (approximately $15,400,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, no funds for administrator salaries, all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32951, "no_votes": 18847, "total_votes": 51798, "percent_yes": 63.614425267384846, "percent_no": 36.385574732615154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Chico Unified School District to issue $239 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Chico Unified School District to issue $239 million in bonds to fund classroom improvements, infrastructure repairs including roofs and plumbing systems, safety updates, and facility expansions for elementary schools and literacy programs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.473543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.012729", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1434, "fingerprint": "2024|202400489|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400489|BUTTE", "content_hash": "0f40bd921f1ed7a2", "measure_id": "202400489", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, build classrooms to increase campus capacity, repair/ replace leaky roofs and aging heating/ ventilation/ air\udbc0\udc02conditioning systems, and make health, safety and security improvements, shall the Thermalito Union Elementary School District measure to issue $6,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $467,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $30 per $100,000 in assessed value, with citizens oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2117, "no_votes": 1613, "total_votes": 3730, "percent_yes": 56.75603217158177, "percent_no": 43.24396782841823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Thermalito Union Elementary School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Thermalito Union Elementary School District to issue $6.8 million in bonds to modernize classrooms and facilities, repair infrastructure systems, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.474713", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.013384", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1432, "fingerprint": "2024|202400487|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400487|BUTTE", "content_hash": "db9b4d3e3022964e", "measure_id": "202400487", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms, and career\udbc0\udc02tech facilities; repair/ replace leaky roofs/ windows; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; expand Ishi Hills Middle School; and make health/ safety improvements, shall Oroville City Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $18,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, levying approximately $21.15 per $100,000 assessed value (generating on average $1,200,00) annually while bonds are outstanding, citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local, with no projected increase to current tax rates?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5752, "no_votes": 4950, "total_votes": 10702, "percent_yes": 53.7469631844515, "percent_no": 46.2530368155485, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Oroville City Elementary School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Oroville City Elementary School District to issue $18 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, repair infrastructure, upgrade electrical systems, expand Ishi Hills Middle School, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $21.15 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.474158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.013057", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1433, "fingerprint": "2024|202400488|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400488|BUTTE", "content_hash": "20edb6cc05a4a5de", "measure_id": "202400488", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education for all students by rebuilding Paradise Elementary School; updating safety and security systems; and constructing/modernizing/upgrading classrooms, labs and school facilities to support student achievement and college and career readiness; shall Paradise Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $43,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying 5 cents per $100 assessed value ($2.4 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO funds for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4430, "no_votes": 5124, "total_votes": 9554, "percent_yes": 46.36801339752983, "percent_no": 53.63198660247017, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Paradise Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Paradise Unified School District to issue $43 million in bonds to rebuild Paradise Elementary School, update safety systems, and modernize classrooms and facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 5 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.474435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.013224", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1420, "fingerprint": "2024|202400006|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400006|BUTTE", "content_hash": "64136bb41f627df9", "measure_id": "202400006", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure funding Butte County services such as maintaining emergency 911 response times; preparing for/responding to and recovering from wildfires/natural disasters; protecting abused/neglected children; addressing homelessness, mental health challenges; retaining/attracting qualified firefighters/EMTs/sheriff\u2019s deputies; preventing thefts/property crimes; supporting libraries services and for general government use by establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing $44,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits/spending disclosure/funds locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60984, "no_votes": 29097, "total_votes": 90081, "percent_yes": 67.69907083624737, "percent_no": 32.30092916375263, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Butte County expected to gener...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Butte County expected to generate $44 million annually to fund various county services including emergency response, wildfire preparation, child protection, homelessness programs, public safety personnel, and libraries. The tax continues until voters choose to end it and includes requirements for audits and spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.315024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.935083", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1423, "fingerprint": "2024|202400145|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400145|BUTTE", "content_hash": "105db2deab0304b7", "measure_id": "202400145", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Oroville be amended to change the City Treasurer from an elected position to one that is appointed by the City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1536, "no_votes": 4081, "total_votes": 5617, "percent_yes": 27.345558127114117, "percent_no": 72.65444187288588, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended the City of Oroville's charter to change the C...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended the City of Oroville's charter to change the City Treasurer position from an elected office to one appointed by the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.362763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.958217", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1424, "fingerprint": "2024|202400146|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400146|BUTTE", "content_hash": "277ffa96288fbeba", "measure_id": "202400146", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Oroville Charter be amended to cause compensation for Council members and the Mayor to be required to be set by ordinance of the City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1752, "no_votes": 3628, "total_votes": 5380, "percent_yes": 32.56505576208178, "percent_no": 67.43494423791822, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the City of Oroville Charter to require that ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the City of Oroville Charter to require that compensation for City Council members and the Mayor be established through a City Council ordinance rather than through the current method.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.363061", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.958366", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1425, "fingerprint": "2024|202400147|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400147|BUTTE", "content_hash": "ac57f0b90f0b5e89", "measure_id": "202400147", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Oroville Charter be amended to repeal Articles XXVII Advertising the City and XXVIII Street and Other Public Improvements/Contracts, and to establish the Park Commission is an Advisory body to the City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2367, "no_votes": 2766, "total_votes": 5133, "percent_yes": 46.113383985973115, "percent_no": 53.886616014026885, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have amended Oroville's city charter to eliminate t...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have amended Oroville's city charter to eliminate two articles dealing with city advertising and public improvement contracts, while changing the Park Commission from its current status to an advisory body that reports to the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.363408", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.958516", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1426, "fingerprint": "2024|202400148|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400148|BUTTE", "content_hash": "675736e5d0e6cfb1", "measure_id": "202400148", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Oroville Charter language be streamlined and updated including merging required departments and commissions into a single Charter Article and making associated clerical changes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2811, "no_votes": 2396, "total_votes": 5207, "percent_yes": 53.985020165162275, "percent_no": 46.014979834837725, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure streamlines and updates the City of Oroville Charter by consolida...", "summary_text": "The measure streamlines and updates the City of Oroville Charter by consolidating required departments and commissions into a single Charter Article and making related clerical changes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.363673", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.958663", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1427, "fingerprint": "2024|202400149|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400149|BUTTE", "content_hash": "ebbabce52bbfac4b", "measure_id": "202400149", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the proposed low income housing project, Fogg Avenue Apartments, located at 2131 Fogg Avenue within the City of Oroville, to be operated by the Housing Authority of the County of Butte including 18 low and very low\udbc0\udc02income units presenting 100 percent of the facility be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3310, "no_votes": 2341, "total_votes": 5651, "percent_yes": 58.573703769244375, "percent_no": 41.426296230755625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure approved a low-income housing project called Fogg Avenue Apartmen...", "summary_text": "The measure approved a low-income housing project called Fogg Avenue Apartments at 2131 Fogg Avenue in Oroville, consisting of 18 units for low and very low-income residents to be operated by the Housing Authority of the County of Butte.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.363948", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.958813", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1421, "fingerprint": "2024|202400143|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400143|BUTTE", "content_hash": "a6c1796c53ec69d1", "measure_id": "202400143", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Resolution No. 08\u201023 \"Resolution of the City Council of the City of Chico Approving General Plan Amendment 22\u201003,\" which approved the Valley's Edge General Plan Amendment on January 3, 2023, providing for the strategic and planned development of the Valley's Edge area of the City, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9414, "no_votes": 15843, "total_votes": 25257, "percent_yes": 37.27283525359306, "percent_no": 62.72716474640694, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have adopted a city council resolution approving a general...", "summary_text": "This measure would have adopted a city council resolution approving a general plan amendment for the strategic and planned development of the Valley's Edge area in Chico.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.362219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.957871", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1422, "fingerprint": "2024|202400144|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400144|BUTTE", "content_hash": "41e400bb35ada692", "measure_id": "202400144", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Resolution No. 09\u201023 \"Resolution of the City Council of the City of Chico Adopting the Valley's Edge Specific Plan (SP 19\u201001),\" which adopted the Valley's Edge Specific Plan on January 3, 2023, providing for the strategic and planned development of the Valley's Edge area of the City, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9574, "no_votes": 15750, "total_votes": 25324, "percent_yes": 37.80603380192702, "percent_no": 62.19396619807298, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have adopted the Valley's Edge Specific Plan, which provid...", "summary_text": "This measure would have adopted the Valley's Edge Specific Plan, which provides for strategic and planned development of the Valley's Edge area in Chico. The plan was originally adopted by the City Council in January 2023 but was subject to this ballot referendum.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.362495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.958058", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1428, "fingerprint": "2024|202400483|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400483|BUTTE", "content_hash": "75aeb61f322a59b5", "measure_id": "202400483", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct a new middle school to reduce student overcrowding, replace temporary portables, upgrade P.E. and arts facilities, renovate/repair classrooms, restrooms and roofs, and improve school safety, shall the Marysville Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $97,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, and levying approximately $49 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $5. 8 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for administrator salaries and all money spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33, "no_votes": 101, "total_votes": 134, "percent_yes": 24.62686567164179, "percent_no": 75.3731343283582, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Marysville Joint Unified School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Marysville Joint Unified School District to issue $97 million in bonds to construct a new middle school, replace temporary buildings, upgrade facilities, and make various campus improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $49 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.472956", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.012415", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1435, "fingerprint": "2024|202400007|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400007|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "f77bc1031cce9e8c", "measure_id": "202400007", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CALAVERAS Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund local fire districts and the City of Angels Camp Fire Department for staffing, training, equipment, and other costs, shall the measure enacting a one percent (1%) transactions and use (sales) tax on all sales of tangible personal property sold at retail in Calaveras County, including the City of Angels Camp, generating approximately $5M annually, without expiration, and increasing appropriation limits consistent with the increased revenue through fiscal year 2027/28, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9587, "no_votes": 7832, "total_votes": 17419, "percent_yes": 55.037602617831105, "percent_no": 44.962397382168895, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacts a 1% sales tax on retail sales of tangible personal proper...", "summary_text": "The measure enacts a 1% sales tax on retail sales of tangible personal property in Calaveras County, including Angels Camp, to fund local fire districts and the Angels Camp Fire Department for staffing, training, equipment, and other costs. The tax has no expiration date and is projected to generate approximately $5 million annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.315416", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.935451", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CALAVERAS Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1436, "fingerprint": "2024|202400008|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400008|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "a122587104bcc4ce", "measure_id": "202400008", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CALAVERAS Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to renew the Calaveras County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program through March 5, 2033 along with its associated annual fees (one dollar per vehicle registered in Calaveras County and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles), which are used to fund the continued removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles found in Calaveras County, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10725, "no_votes": 6492, "total_votes": 17217, "percent_yes": 62.29308241853981, "percent_no": 37.70691758146019, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.315741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.935786", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CALAVERAS Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1437, "fingerprint": "2024|202400009|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400009|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "cb4ee186cb718bae", "measure_id": "202400009", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CALAVERAS Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to renew the Calaveras County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program through November 5, 2033 along with its associated annual fees (one dollar per vehicle registered in Calaveras County and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles), which are used to fund the continued removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles found in Calaveras County, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18054, "no_votes": 7231, "total_votes": 25285, "percent_yes": 71.40201700613011, "percent_no": 28.59798299386989, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews Calaveras County's Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program th...", "summary_text": "This measure renews Calaveras County's Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program through November 5, 2033, continuing annual fees of $1 per registered vehicle and an additional $2 for certain commercial vehicles. The fees fund the removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles found throughout the county.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.316038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.936107", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CALAVERAS Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1438, "fingerprint": "2024|202400010|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400010|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "d5c06290198c0f14", "measure_id": "202400010", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CALAVERAS Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to maintain Middle River Community Services District's roads, impose a new special tax replacing the existing one of $100.00 per improved lot and $75.00 per unimproved lot without expiration at $200.00 per improved lot and $150.00 per unimproved lot, generating an approximate additional $13,000.00 annually and increasing the District's appropriations limit equal to revenue received, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45, "no_votes": 20, "total_votes": 65, "percent_yes": 69.23076923076923, "percent_no": 30.769230769230774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure replaces an existing special tax for road maintenance in the Mid...", "summary_text": "This measure replaces an existing special tax for road maintenance in the Middle River Community Services District, doubling the annual tax from $100 to $200 per improved lot and from $75 to $150 per unimproved lot. The tax increase would generate approximately $13,000 additional revenue annually for road maintenance and removes the previous tax's expiration date.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.316395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.936271", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CALAVERAS Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1441, "fingerprint": "2024|202400491|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400491|COLUSA", "content_hash": "5dec285dbce2aa7c", "measure_id": "202400491", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "COLUSA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of Maxwell schools; replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize or renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; and replace HVAC and deteriorating plumbing systems; shall Maxwell Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $9,100,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, averaging $572,000 raised annually with approximate rates of $60 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 418, "no_votes": 276, "total_votes": 694, "percent_yes": 60.23054755043228, "percent_no": 39.76945244956772, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Maxwell Unified School District to issue $9,100,000 i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Maxwell Unified School District to issue $9,100,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom and restroom renovations, HVAC replacements, and health and safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.475439", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.013705", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "COLUSA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1442, "fingerprint": "2024|202400492|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400492|COLUSA", "content_hash": "580a27a8679d3a1c", "measure_id": "202400492", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "COLUSA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; modernize/renovate career technical education facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems: and upgrade inadequate electrical systems; shall the Williams Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $23,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying approximately $60 per $100,000 assessed value ($1,300,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight/audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 743, "no_votes": 525, "total_votes": 1268, "percent_yes": 58.59621451104101, "percent_no": 41.40378548895899, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Williams Unified School District to issue $23 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Williams Unified School District to issue $23 million in bonds to renovate and modernize school facilities, including career technical education facilities, classrooms, restrooms, roofs, plumbing, sewer systems, and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.475708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.013871", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "COLUSA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1440, "fingerprint": "2024|202400490|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400490|COLUSA", "content_hash": "5e9a8483abfcf7b3", "measure_id": "202400490", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "COLUSA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair or replace leaky roofs and windows, aging heating/cooling/plumbing/electrical systems; improve access for students with disabilities; repair, equip, construct science, technology, engineering, arts, and math classrooms/labs, sites; improve student safety/ security; shall Colusa Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $13.8 million in bonds at legal rates, levying $.06/$100 of assessed value (averaging $1.1 million annually) while bonds are outstand, with no money for administrators, audits, independent oversight, and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1673, "no_votes": 1086, "total_votes": 2759, "percent_yes": 60.63791228706052, "percent_no": 39.36208771293948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Colusa Unified School District to issue $13", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Colusa Unified School District to issue $13.8 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including roofs, HVAC systems, accessibility improvements, and STEM classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.475024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.013545", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "COLUSA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1439, "fingerprint": "2024|202400150|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400150|COLUSA", "content_hash": "ae5dad6283be0720", "measure_id": "202400150", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "COLUSA Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted increasing the City of Williams' sales tax rate from 1/2% to 1%, with the increase providing approximately $1,000,000 annually until ended by voters, to fund specific City services, with 80% to fund road repair, 10% to fund parks and recreation, and 10% to fund fire protection services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 491, "no_votes": 476, "total_votes": 967, "percent_yes": 50.77559462254395, "percent_no": 49.22440537745605, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have doubled Williams' sales tax rate from 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have doubled Williams' sales tax rate from 0.5% to 1% to generate approximately $1 million annually, with 80% designated for road repairs, 10% for parks and recreation, and 10% for fire protection services. The increased tax revenue would continue until terminated by future voter action.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.364217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.959005", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "COLUSA Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1443, "fingerprint": "2024|202400151|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400151|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "4de2f783b262b549", "measure_id": "202400151", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7554, "no_votes": 3959, "total_votes": 11513, "percent_yes": 65.61278554677321, "percent_no": 34.38721445322679, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.364513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.959154", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1451, "fingerprint": "2024|202400493|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400493|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "199f1088de8d69b5", "measure_id": "202400493", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade classrooms, labs and learning technology, improve school safety and emergency communications, repair leaky roofs and restrooms, upgrade heating, air-conditioning, electrical and plumbing systems, and make accessibility upgrades for people with disabilities; shall Antioch Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted, issuing $195,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating an average $13,500,000 annually until approximately 2059, at estimated tax rates of approximately $48 per $100,000 assessed value with annual audits, citizen\u2019s oversight, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10397, "no_votes": 7574, "total_votes": 17971, "percent_yes": 57.854320850258745, "percent_no": 42.145679149741255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Antioch Unified School District to issue $195 mill...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Antioch Unified School District to issue $195 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and lab upgrades, safety enhancements, roof and restroom repairs, HVAC and utility system updates, and accessibility improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $48 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $13.5 million annually until around 2059.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.475984", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.014021", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1452, "fingerprint": "2024|202400494|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400494|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "909e004e569eea2b", "measure_id": "202400494", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away (and without increasing the tax rate) for high-quality programs in science/technology/engineering/math; attract/retain qualified teachers/counselors; provide hands-on science labs; and keep libraries open, shall Martinez Unified School District\u2019s measure renewing its existing school parcel tax be adopted, at the current $75 per year rate (estimated to raise $850,000 annually), for eight years, with senior exemptions, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds supporting Martinez students?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6917, "no_votes": 2313, "total_votes": 9230, "percent_yes": 74.94041170097509, "percent_no": 25.05958829902491, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an existing $75 annual parcel tax in the Martinez Unified...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an existing $75 annual parcel tax in the Martinez Unified School District for eight years to fund science/technology/engineering/math programs, teacher retention, science labs, and library operations, with an estimated $850,000 raised annually. The measure includes senior exemptions and independent oversight, maintaining the current tax rate rather than increasing it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.476309", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.014182", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1453, "fingerprint": "2024|202400495|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400495|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "24af788964e96caf", "measure_id": "202400495", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Moraga\u2019s local elementary/middle schools by upgrading science/technology/engineering classrooms/labs; replacing leaking roofs/unsafe windows; preventing classroom overcrowding; and updating classrooms/technology for 21st-century learning, shall Moraga School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $52,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding (averaging $3,000,000 raised annually) with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators, and providing local funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4052, "no_votes": 1955, "total_votes": 6007, "percent_yes": 67.45463625769935, "percent_no": 32.54536374230065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Moraga School District to issue $52 million in bo...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Moraga School District to issue $52 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including upgrading science and technology classrooms, replacing roofs and windows, addressing overcrowding, and updating technology. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.476672", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.014345", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1454, "fingerprint": "2024|202400496|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400496|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d2646f4483c76500", "measure_id": "202400496", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renew expiring local school funding that cannot be taken by the State; attract/retain highly qualified teachers; support academic programs in science, technology, engineering, arts, math, reading, and writing; and prepare students to compete for college and careers; shall San Ramon Valley Unified School District's measure renewing its existing $144 annual parcel tax be adopted at the same rate, providing approximately $6.8 million annually for 9 years, with annual adjustments, senior exemptions, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17258, "no_votes": 10159, "total_votes": 27417, "percent_yes": 62.94634715687347, "percent_no": 37.05365284312653, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-05-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.476948", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.014508", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1455, "fingerprint": "2024|202400497|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400497|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2a33e6c2f8b3fb79", "measure_id": "202400497", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain high-quality local schools and protect essential educational programs from state cuts; support programs in reading and literacy for the youngest learners; address student mental health needs; and provide qualified classroom teachers specializing in students with special needs and counselors to support struggling students, shall San Ramon Valley Unified School District's measure levying $98 per parcel annually be adopted, providing approximately $4.6 million annually for 9 years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15518, "no_votes": 11303, "total_votes": 26821, "percent_yes": 57.85764885723873, "percent_no": 42.14235114276127, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a $98 annual parcel tax on properties within t...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a $98 annual parcel tax on properties within the San Ramon Valley Unified School District for 9 years to generate approximately $4.6 million annually for educational programs including reading and literacy, mental health services, special needs support, and counseling services. The tax would have included exemptions for seniors and prohibited the use of funds for administrator salaries, with independent oversight of the revenue.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-05-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.477261", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.014660", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1444, "fingerprint": "2024|202400152|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400152|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8485a5407701b750", "measure_id": "202400152", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue to maintain and prevent cuts to City services, without increasing taxes, such as: fire prevention/emergency response times; neighborhood police patrols; wildfire prevention; crime prevention/ investigation; after-school programs; library hours; senior services; open space, parks/ playfields; for general government use, shall El Cerrito\u2019s measure extending the existing voter approved 1\u00a2 sales tax, until ended by voters be adopted, providing approximately $4,000,000 annually, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, all funds staying local, none to Sacramento?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10885, "no_votes": 2549, "total_votes": 13434, "percent_yes": 81.02575554563049, "percent_no": 18.97424445436951, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends El Cerrito's existing 1-cent sales tax indefinitely unti...", "summary_text": "This measure extends El Cerrito's existing 1-cent sales tax indefinitely until ended by voters, generating approximately $4 million annually for general city services. The tax extension maintains current funding levels for services including fire, police, libraries, parks, and senior programs without increasing the existing tax rate.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.364820", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.959300", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1445, "fingerprint": "2024|202400153|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400153|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d3177eb8428ec856", "measure_id": "202400153", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding to maintain City services, including public streets, storm drains, pothole repairs, wildfire preparedness, number of police officers, traffic safety, senior and youth programs, and other general city services, shall the measure enacting a 1/2\u00a2 sales tax for 7 years generating approximately $2,400,000 annually with yearly financial audits, public review of expenditures by a citizen oversight committee, and all funds benefitting Lafayette be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10010, "no_votes": 5434, "total_votes": 15444, "percent_yes": 64.81481481481481, "percent_no": 35.18518518518519, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacts a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacts a 0.5% sales tax in Lafayette for 7 years to fund general city services including street maintenance, storm drains, police staffing, wildfire preparedness, and senior/youth programs, generating approximately $2.4 million annually. The measure includes provisions for yearly financial audits and citizen oversight of expenditures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.365104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.959466", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1446, "fingerprint": "2024|202400154|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400154|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e693e3d895dbd7fd", "measure_id": "202400154", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain Pinole's fiscal stability, prevent cuts, provide essential City services such as: maintaining 911 emergency response times/fire prevention; preventing property crimes; keeping public areas/parks safe and clean; providing clean water; repairing potholes/streets; retaining/attracting local businesses; other general services; shall a measure be adopted establishing a 1/2\u00a2 sales tax providing $2,500,000 annually until ended by voters if approved by the State, requiring audits, spending disclosure, all funds spent for Pinole?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5831, "no_votes": 2768, "total_votes": 8599, "percent_yes": 67.81021048959181, "percent_no": 32.18978951040819, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.5% sales tax in Pinole, California, generating approximately $2.5 million annually for general city services including emergency response, public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and parks. The tax continues until ended by voters and requires audits and spending disclosure, with all funds designated for Pinole city use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.365409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.959629", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1447, "fingerprint": "2024|202400155|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400155|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "157b4876ca65b9dc", "measure_id": "202400155", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to reform the election process in the City of Richmond to improve accountability, governance, and strengthen representation by adding a nonpartisan primary municipal election to the City\u2019s election process?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20645, "no_votes": 14879, "total_votes": 35524, "percent_yes": 58.11564013061592, "percent_no": 41.88435986938408, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the City of Richmond's charter to add a nonpartisan prim...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the City of Richmond's charter to add a nonpartisan primary election to the municipal election process. The change reforms how city elections are conducted by implementing a two-stage voting system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.365712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.959790", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1448, "fingerprint": "2024|202400156|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400156|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "30446ec414e00028", "measure_id": "202400156", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Richmond Charter be amended to authorize use of instant runoff voting, also known as ranked choice voting, to allow Richmond voters to rank Mayor and City Council election candidates in order of preference on their ballots, intended for implementation for the November 2026 election, and upon adoption of an implementing ordinance by the Richmond City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19284, "no_votes": 16168, "total_votes": 35452, "percent_yes": 54.39467448945052, "percent_no": 45.60532551054948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the City of Richmond's charter to authorize the use of ra...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the City of Richmond's charter to authorize the use of ranked choice voting (instant runoff voting) for mayor and city council elections, allowing voters to rank candidates in order of preference. Implementation is intended for the November 2026 election, pending adoption of an implementing ordinance by the city council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.365983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.959946", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1449, "fingerprint": "2024|202400157|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400157|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "950bad8d1db08546", "measure_id": "202400157", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure imposing a cannabis (\u201cmarijuana\u201d) business license tax of up to 7% of gross receipts, or $10 per square foot of commercial grow area, lasting until voters end it, and estimated to generate $1,500,000 to $2,200,000 annually to provide City services such as police protection, recreational services, services to local youth and seniors, community grant programs, and for general government use, with all funds staying local and subject to annual audit, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5255, "no_votes": 1978, "total_votes": 7233, "percent_yes": 72.65311765519148, "percent_no": 27.34688234480852, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposes a cannabis business license tax of up to 7% of gross rec...", "summary_text": "This measure imposes a cannabis business license tax of up to 7% of gross receipts or $10 per square foot of grow area, estimated to generate $1.5 to $2.2 million annually for city services including police, recreation, youth and senior services, community grants, and general government operations. The tax would remain in effect until voters decide to end it, with funds staying local and subject to annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.366292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.960094", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1450, "fingerprint": "2024|202400158|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400158|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8745ac89fcbab63b", "measure_id": "202400158", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide local funding to maintain City of San Ramon programs, services and facilities, including: public safety and police services; neighborhood crime prevention; traffic enforcement and road safety; street and road improvements and maintenance; library and recreation services; park maintenance; youth, senior, and cultural programs; and other city services and facilities; shall the City of San Ramon levy a one cent sales tax, providing approximately $16,000,000 annually for 10 years, subject to public review, annual audits, and all funds benefitting San Ramon?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21035, "no_votes": 16386, "total_votes": 37421, "percent_yes": 56.21175275914594, "percent_no": 43.78824724085406, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the City of San Ramon to levy a one cent sales tax for...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the City of San Ramon to levy a one cent sales tax for 10 years, generating approximately $16 million annually to fund various city services including public safety, street maintenance, parks, libraries, and recreation programs. The tax revenue would be subject to annual audits and public review, with all funds designated for San Ramon city services and facilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.366591", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.960255", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1457, "fingerprint": "2024|202400499|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400499|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "a4947ae53a8b4b19", "measure_id": "202400499", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize/construct classrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; construct career/technical education classrooms; renovate facilities at Martinez junior/senior high schools and adult education; shall the Martinez Unified School District measure authorizing $90,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately $38.40 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $5,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a board appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8700, "no_votes": 6803, "total_votes": 15503, "percent_yes": 56.11817067664323, "percent_no": 43.88182932335677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Martinez Unified School District to issue $90 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Martinez Unified School District to issue $90 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, construct career/technical education facilities, and renovate facilities at Martinez junior/senior high schools and adult education centers. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $38.40 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising about $5.8 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.477903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.014961", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1458, "fingerprint": "2024|202400500|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400500|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b03043d08777b091", "measure_id": "202400500", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair, upgrade and expand local schools; fix leaky roofs; improve safety/ security/ accessibility for students with disabilities; update classrooms/ labs for math, reading, writing, and science; and prevent student overcrowding, shall Pittsburg Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted, authorizing $140,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying a tax averaging $60 per $100,000 assessed value ($9,200,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13743, "no_votes": 5444, "total_votes": 19187, "percent_yes": 71.62662219210925, "percent_no": 28.373377807890748, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Pittsburg Unified School District to issue $140 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Pittsburg Unified School District to issue $140 million in bonds to repair, upgrade, and expand school facilities, including fixing roofs, improving safety and accessibility, updating classrooms and labs, and addressing overcrowding. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $60 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.478248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.015121", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1459, "fingerprint": "2024|202400501|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400501|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ca53504e3cf86956", "measure_id": "202400501", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Without increasing current tax rates, to renew expiring local school funding that cannot be taken by the State; attract/retain highly qualified teachers; support academic programs in science, technology, engineering, arts, math, reading, writing; and prepare students to compete for college/careers; shall San Ramon Valley Unified School District\u2019s measure renewing its existing $144 annual parcel tax be adopted at the same rate, providing approximately $6.8 million annually for 9 years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61740, "no_votes": 20690, "total_votes": 82430, "percent_yes": 74.89991507946137, "percent_no": 25.100084920538634, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews San Ramon Valley Unified School District's existing $144 ...", "summary_text": "This measure renews San Ramon Valley Unified School District's existing $144 annual parcel tax for 9 years at the same rate, providing approximately $6.8 million annually for teacher retention, academic programs, and student preparation while including senior exemptions and prohibiting use of funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.478647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.015282", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1456, "fingerprint": "2024|202400498|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400498|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e87e9b97cd722ec5", "measure_id": "202400498", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair / upgrade elementary and middle schools, including replace school well for safe drinking water; upgrade classrooms/ labs for science, technology, engineering, arts, math instruction; repair leaky roofs/ HVAC systems; upgrade school safety/ security systems; shall Byron Union School District's measure be adopted authorizing $24,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying $18 per $100,000 of assessed value (averaging $1,520,000 raised annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4147, "no_votes": 3343, "total_votes": 7490, "percent_yes": 55.3671562082777, "percent_no": 44.6328437917223, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Byron Union School District to issue $24 million in b...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Byron Union School District to issue $24 million in bonds to repair and upgrade elementary and middle schools, including replacing a school well, upgrading classrooms and labs, fixing roofs and HVAC systems, and improving safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $18 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising an average of $1.52 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.477600", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.014812", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1460, "fingerprint": "2024|202400502|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400502|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "64e2e0acd38a883d", "measure_id": "202400502", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "DEL NORTE Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs and outdated infrastructure including plumbing, sewer, and electrical; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize classrooms; and renovate career/ technical education facilities; shall the Del Norte Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $59,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying approximately $59 per $100,000 assessed value ($3,100,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight/audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4913, "no_votes": 5223, "total_votes": 10136, "percent_yes": 48.47079715864246, "percent_no": 51.52920284135754, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Del Norte Unified School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Del Norte Unified School District to issue $59 million in bonds to fund facility repairs, infrastructure improvements, classroom modernization, and career/technical education facility renovations. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $59 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.478944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.015446", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "DEL NORTE Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1461, "fingerprint": "2024|202400503|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400503|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "489a760ced63b905", "measure_id": "202400503", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "DEL NORTE Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade outdated facilities, classrooms, and labs used for job training and science/technology education, deteriorating roofs, electrical wiring, and plumbing, and aging student housing; and acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment, shall Redwoods Community College District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $120,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, ($8,400,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with audits, independent oversight, and no money for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4361, "no_votes": 5810, "total_votes": 10171, "percent_yes": 42.87680660701996, "percent_no": 57.12319339298004, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Redwoods Community College District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Redwoods Community College District to issue $120 million in bonds to repair and upgrade facilities, classrooms, labs, roofs, electrical systems, plumbing, and student housing. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes of $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.479220", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.015599", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "DEL NORTE Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1476, "fingerprint": "2024|202400504|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400504|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "11f91987d418d4df", "measure_id": "202400504", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Black Oak Mine Unified School District's measure to expand classrooms for Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM); replace leaky roofs/plumbing; and enhance labs for Coding, Robotics, Woodworking, Circuitry, and Career Training be adopted, authorizing $12.7 million of bonds with average levies below $40 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $1.2 million annually) while outstanding, legal rates, audits, citizen oversight, and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4622, "no_votes": 3315, "total_votes": 7937, "percent_yes": 58.233589517449914, "percent_no": 41.766410482550086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Black Oak Mine Unified School District to issue $12", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Black Oak Mine Unified School District to issue $12.7 million in bonds to fund classroom expansion for STEM programs, infrastructure repairs including roofs and plumbing, and improvements to labs for coding, robotics, woodworking, and career training. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below $40 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $1.2 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.479487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.015764", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1471, "fingerprint": "2024|202400020|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400020|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "1801464f16c024bc", "measure_id": "202400020", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $500.00 on each parcel of land within the River Pines Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance and generating an annual revenue of approximately $47,000.00, to replace the current benefit assessment of $275, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75, "no_votes": 44, "total_votes": 119, "percent_yes": 63.02521008403361, "percent_no": 36.97478991596639, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have replaced a $275 annual benefit assessment with a $500...", "summary_text": "This measure would have replaced a $275 annual benefit assessment with a $500 annual special tax on each parcel in the River Pines Zone of Benefit for road improvements and maintenance, generating approximately $47,000 annually. The tax would have continued for unlimited duration starting in fiscal year 2025/2026.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.319228", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.937828", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1474, "fingerprint": "2024|202400023|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400023|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "d0efe11d328cbacf", "measure_id": "202400023", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $685.00 on each parcel of land within the Walnut Drive Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance and generating an annual revenue of approximately $51,375, to replace the current benefit assessment of $325, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 90, "no_votes": 46, "total_votes": 136, "percent_yes": 66.17647058823529, "percent_no": 33.82352941176471, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have replaced a current $325 annual benefit assessment with...", "summary_text": "The measure would have replaced a current $325 annual benefit assessment with a $685 annual special tax on each parcel in the Walnut Drive Zone of Benefit to fund road improvements and maintenance. The tax would have generated approximately $51,375 annually and continued for an unlimited duration starting in fiscal year 2025/2026.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.320075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.938281", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1472, "fingerprint": "2024|202400021|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400021|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "bc7414a4d300b456", "measure_id": "202400021", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $1,000.00 on each parcel of land within the Ryan Ranch Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance and generating an annual revenue of approximately $81,000.00, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 79, "no_votes": 35, "total_votes": 114, "percent_yes": 69.2982456140351, "percent_no": 30.701754385964904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes an annual $1,000 special tax on each parcel within th...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes an annual $1,000 special tax on each parcel within the Ryan Ranch Zone of Benefit in El Dorado County, beginning in fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing indefinitely. The tax is dedicated solely to road improvements and maintenance and is expected to generate approximately $81,000 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.319511", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.937977", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1470, "fingerprint": "2024|202400019|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400019|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "c9a42018e2690342", "measure_id": "202400019", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $400.00 on each parcel of land within the Pilot View Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance and generating an annual revenue of approximately $28,800.00, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45, "no_votes": 53, "total_votes": 98, "percent_yes": 45.91836734693878, "percent_no": 54.08163265306122, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have levied a $400 annual special tax on each parcel of lan...", "summary_text": "The measure would have levied a $400 annual special tax on each parcel of land within the Pilot View Zone of Benefit in El Dorado County to fund road improvements and maintenance, generating approximately $28,800 annually. The tax would have continued for an unlimited duration starting in fiscal year 2025/2026.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.318962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.937674", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1469, "fingerprint": "2024|202400018|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400018|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "186eab16a3963498", "measure_id": "202400018", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $550.00 on each parcel of land within the King of the Mountain Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance and generating an annual revenue of approximately $11,550.00, to replace the current benefit assessment of $250, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 15, "percent_yes": 86.66666666666667, "percent_no": 13.333333333333329, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies an annual $550 special tax on each parcel within the King...", "summary_text": "This measure levies an annual $550 special tax on each parcel within the King of the Mountain Zone of Benefit in El Dorado County for road improvements and maintenance, replacing the current $250 benefit assessment. The tax would begin in fiscal year 2025/2026 and continue indefinitely, generating approximately $11,550 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.318655", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.937522", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1462, "fingerprint": "2024|202400011|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400011|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "91a37c30a3bfd3d1", "measure_id": "202400011", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $1,000.00 on each parcel of land within the Blanchard Estates Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for road, drainage and landscape maintenance and generating an annual revenue of approximately $12,000.00, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 15, "percent_yes": 40.0, "percent_no": 60.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have levied an annual $1,000 special tax on each parcel wit...", "summary_text": "The measure would have levied an annual $1,000 special tax on each parcel within the Blanchard Estates Zone of Benefit in El Dorado County, beginning in fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing indefinitely. The tax revenue, estimated at approximately $12,000 annually, would have been restricted to road, drainage, and landscape maintenance within the zone.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.316679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.936427", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1467, "fingerprint": "2024|202400016|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400016|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "e7677d9ee368fbb5", "measure_id": "202400016", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $375.00, with an annual adjustment using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, on each parcel of land within the Emerald Meadows Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for drainage, street lighting, landscape maintenance, and wetland related services and generating an annual revenue of approximately $41,625.00, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 194, "no_votes": 33, "total_votes": 227, "percent_yes": 85.46255506607929, "percent_no": 14.53744493392071, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Maintenance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies an annual special tax of $375 per parcel (adjusted annual...", "summary_text": "This measure levies an annual special tax of $375 per parcel (adjusted annually for inflation) on properties within the Emerald Meadows Zone of Benefit in El Dorado County, starting in fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing indefinitely. The tax revenue, estimated at approximately $41,625 annually, would fund drainage, street lighting, landscape maintenance, and wetland-related services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.318112", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.937224", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1463, "fingerprint": "2024|202400012|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400012|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "6278c17e97a214f0", "measure_id": "202400012", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $350.00 on each parcel of land within the Cavalry Meadows Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for drainage maintenance and generating an annual revenue of approximately $3,850.00, to replace the current benefit assessment of $110, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 17, "total_votes": 17, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Flood Control/Drainage", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have replaced a $110 annual benefit assessment with a $350...", "summary_text": "This measure would have replaced a $110 annual benefit assessment with a $350 annual special tax on each parcel in the Cavalry Meadows Zone of Benefit for drainage maintenance, generating approximately $3,850 annually with no expiration date. The measure failed with 0% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.317001", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.936582", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1473, "fingerprint": "2024|202400022|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400022|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ca6f1a19c8f55473", "measure_id": "202400022", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $350.00 on each parcel of land within the Sundown Estates Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2025/2026 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for drainage maintenance and generating an annual revenue of approximately $3,500.00, to replace the current benefit assessment of $100, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3, "no_votes": 13, "total_votes": 16, "percent_yes": 18.75, "percent_no": 81.25, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Flood Control/Drainage", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed an annual special tax of $350 per parcel on pr...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed an annual special tax of $350 per parcel on properties within the Sundown Estates Zone of Benefit for drainage maintenance, replacing the current $100 benefit assessment. The tax would have generated approximately $3,500 annually and continued indefinitely starting in fiscal year 2025/2026.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.319806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.938128", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1475, "fingerprint": "2024|202400159|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400159|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "e863ad6997cecc08", "measure_id": "202400159", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to tax property owners who keep nonexempt residential units in the City of South Lake Tahoe vacant more than 182 days/year, $3,000/unit for the first year of vacancy and $6,000/unit for subsequent consecutive years, subject to CPI adjustment, with exceptions, generating between $10,000,000 to $20,000,000 annually until ended by voters, to be used only for housing, roadworks, transit, and administrative and legal costs, with administration overseen by oversight committee, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2580, "no_votes": 6228, "total_votes": 8808, "percent_yes": 29.291553133514984, "percent_no": 70.70844686648502, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an annual tax of $3,000 for the first year an...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an annual tax of $3,000 for the first year and $6,000 for subsequent years on residential property owners who keep units vacant for more than 182 days per year in South Lake Tahoe. The tax revenue, estimated at $10-20 million annually, would have funded housing programs, road improvements, transit, and related administrative costs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.366886", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.960408", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1478, "fingerprint": "2024|202400506|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400506|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "b5ca32412a5af192", "measure_id": "202400506", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; replace leaky roofs; renovate and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; and make safety and security improvements; shall Pollock Pines Elementary School District's measure be adopted authorizing $11,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $693,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3055, "no_votes": 1798, "total_votes": 4853, "percent_yes": 62.95075211209561, "percent_no": 37.04924788790439, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Pollock Pines Elementary School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Pollock Pines Elementary School District to issue $11,500,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom modernization, plumbing replacement, and safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.480027", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.016070", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1464, "fingerprint": "2024|202400013|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400013|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "84b41a58860555cb", "measure_id": "202400013", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the El Dorado Hills Community Services District repeal Landscape and Lighting District No. 22 and refund levied special assessments?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1196, "no_votes": 313, "total_votes": 1509, "percent_yes": 79.25778661365143, "percent_no": 20.742213386348567, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Maintenance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would repeal El Dorado Hills Community Services District's Lands...", "summary_text": "This measure would repeal El Dorado Hills Community Services District's Landscape and Lighting District No. 22 and provide refunds for special assessments that were levied on property owners within that district.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.317270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.936736", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1465, "fingerprint": "2024|202400014|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400014|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "47138bad39ab5585", "measure_id": "202400014", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the El Dorado Hills Community Services District repeal Landscape and Lighting District No. 33 and refund levied special assessments?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1772, "no_votes": 723, "total_votes": 2495, "percent_yes": 71.02204408817634, "percent_no": 28.977955911823656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Maintenance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure repeals El Dorado Hills Community Services District's Landscape a...", "summary_text": "The measure repeals El Dorado Hills Community Services District's Landscape and Lighting District No. 33 and requires refunding of special assessments that were levied for the district.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.317535", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.936896", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1466, "fingerprint": "2024|202400015|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400015|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "7d40a0d0ede96b80", "measure_id": "202400015", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the El Dorado Hills Community Services District repeal Landscape and Lighting District No. 39 and refund levied special assessments?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1269, "no_votes": 125, "total_votes": 1394, "percent_yes": 91.03299856527977, "percent_no": 8.967001434720231, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Maintenance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would repeal El Dorado Hills Community Services District's Landsc...", "summary_text": "The measure would repeal El Dorado Hills Community Services District's Landscape and Lighting District No. 39 and require refunding of special assessments that were levied on property owners for landscape and lighting services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.317818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.937074", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1468, "fingerprint": "2024|202400017|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400017|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "512437bb0ca34525", "measure_id": "202400017", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure increasing the per parcel Hickok Road CSD special tax limit from $200 to $400 per year, resulting in a maximum annual income of $24,800 for road maintenance for all future years, with a provision for adjustment not to exceed the cost of living as determined by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) prepared by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics as appropriate, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63, "no_votes": 24, "total_votes": 87, "percent_yes": 72.41379310344827, "percent_no": 27.58620689655173, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases the annual special tax limit for the Hickok Road Commu...", "summary_text": "This measure increases the annual special tax limit for the Hickok Road Community Services District from $200 to $400 per parcel to fund road maintenance, with provisions for future cost-of-living adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index. The increase would generate a maximum of $24,800 annually for ongoing road maintenance costs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.318375", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.937374", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1477, "fingerprint": "2024|202400505|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400505|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "3ed50bd06064fe57", "measure_id": "202400505", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve quality education by updating classrooms, labs, libraries, and career training facilities; repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating/cooling and electrical systems; improving fire safety, water quality and school security; and removing hazardous materials like asbestos/ lead, shall Lake Tahoe Unified School District's measure be adopted issuing $127,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying 3.5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (approximately $6,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8196, "no_votes": 5196, "total_votes": 13392, "percent_yes": 61.200716845878134, "percent_no": 38.799283154121866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Lake Tahoe Unified School District to issue $127 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Lake Tahoe Unified School District to issue $127 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and lab updates, infrastructure repairs, safety upgrades, and hazardous material removal. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 3.5 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $6.6 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.479759", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.015913", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10973, "fingerprint": "2024|202400509|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400509|FRESNO", "content_hash": "214184aa8a828d07", "measure_id": "202400509", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With no estimated increase to current tax rates, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying local, shall Clovis Unified School District's measure to maintain neighborhood schools, upgrade security/health measures and avoid overcrowding by: building, modernizing, and repairing school and career/vocational facilities, authorizing $400 million in bonds at legal interest rates, levies averaging less than 5\u00a2/$100 assessed value, raising $32 million annually for bonds through maturity be adopted, with independent audits and citizens' oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60003, "no_votes": 44102, "total_votes": 104105, "percent_yes": 57.63700110465395, "percent_no": 42.36299889534605, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Clovis Unified School District to issue $400 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Clovis Unified School District to issue $400 million in bonds to build, modernize, and repair school and career/vocational facilities, with funding generated through property tax levies averaging less than 5 cents per $100 of assessed value. The bonds would raise approximately $32 million annually and include provisions for independent audits and citizens' oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.064763", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.480831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.016519", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1479, "fingerprint": "2024|202400024|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400024|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a7e0b0ca0ebb69da", "measure_id": "202400024", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending section 15 of the Fresno County Charter to keep the election dates for the office of Sheriff and District Attorney set in gubernatorial, non-presidential election years with other County elective offices be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80088, "no_votes": 65737, "total_votes": 145825, "percent_yes": 54.92062403565918, "percent_no": 45.07937596434082, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the Fresno County Charter to maintain the current electio...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the Fresno County Charter to maintain the current election schedule for Sheriff and District Attorney positions, keeping them aligned with other county offices during gubernatorial election years rather than presidential election years.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.320360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.938431", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1480, "fingerprint": "2024|202400025|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400025|FRESNO", "content_hash": "763d47b5df84135f", "measure_id": "202400025", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to add new subdivision (f) to section 12 of the Fresno County Charter to provide the Fresno County Board of Supervisors the duty and power to name or change the name of geographic features or place names within the unincorporated portions of the County of Fresno be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53164, "no_votes": 94940, "total_votes": 148104, "percent_yes": 35.89639712634365, "percent_no": 64.10360287365634, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have added a provision to the Fresno County Charter giving...", "summary_text": "This measure would have added a provision to the Fresno County Charter giving the Board of Supervisors the authority to name or rename geographic features and places in unincorporated areas of the county.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.320779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.938583", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1501, "fingerprint": "2024|202400519|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400519|FRESNO", "content_hash": "cf99a8f616c42969", "measure_id": "202400519", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Coalinga College with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall West Hills Community College District's measure to expand career training/technical educational classrooms and facilities; renovate outdated classrooms, labs, and stu\u2022dent dorms; and improve campus safety be adopted, authorizing $19 million of bonds with estimated average levies below $24 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (approximately $1 million annually) while outstanding, with legal rates, audits, independent oversight and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2749, "no_votes": 1715, "total_votes": 4464, "percent_yes": 61.581541218637994, "percent_no": 38.418458781362006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the West Hills Community College District to issue $1...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the West Hills Community College District to issue $19 million in bonds to expand career training facilities, renovate classrooms and labs, upgrade student dormitories, and improve campus safety at Coalinga College. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies estimated at less than $24 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.483725", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.018106", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1492, "fingerprint": "2024|202400510|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400510|FRESNO", "content_hash": "419eae94c6fa049b", "measure_id": "202400510", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/update vocational/career, science, engineering, agricultural classrooms/labs; remove asbestos/ mold; provide safe drinking water; acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment, wiring, gas lines, leaky roofs; upgrade, security, emergency communications systems; shall Dinuba Unified Schoo] District's measure be adopted authorizing $42,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation ($2,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring oversight, public spending disclosure, all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 5, "total_votes": 5, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Dinuba Unified School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Dinuba Unified School District to issue $42 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including vocational classrooms, safety systems, and infrastructure, funded by a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation. The measure failed with 0% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.481136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.016680", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1481, "fingerprint": "2024|202400026|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400026|FRESNO", "content_hash": "74fbb45c5750d90e", "measure_id": "202400026", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure expanding access in nursing, agriculture, criminology, science, engineering, other fields; repairing/upgrading campus facilities; providing safe drinking water; making campus more accessible for people with disabilities; providing scholarships for local students, veterans, by establishing a countywide \u00bc\u00a2 sales tax, except in jurisdictions where the tax exceeds the combined rate limit, providing approximately $63,000,000 annually for 25 years with audits, public spending disclosure, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65234, "no_votes": 87389, "total_votes": 152623, "percent_yes": 42.741919632034495, "percent_no": 57.258080367965505, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a countywide quarter-cent sales tax in Fr...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a countywide quarter-cent sales tax in Fresno County to fund community college improvements including facility repairs, program expansion in various fields, campus accessibility upgrades, and student scholarships. The tax was projected to generate approximately $63 million annually for 25 years, with exemptions for jurisdictions already at their combined tax rate limits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.321101", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.938738", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1493, "fingerprint": "2024|202400511|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400511|FRESNO", "content_hash": "26bd9f21a8ca52f7", "measure_id": "202400511", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade science, technology, vocational classrooms to help retain/attract quality teachers; address immediate safety needs; improve disabled access, electrical wiring. emergency con1munication systems; protect drinking water; acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment, shall Firebaugh-Las Deltas Unified School District's measure authorizing $25,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation. raising on average $1,700,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring oversight/audits. spending disclosure, funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1182, "no_votes": 619, "total_votes": 1801, "percent_yes": 65.63020544142142, "percent_no": 34.369794558578576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Firebaugh-Las Deltas Unified School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Firebaugh-Las Deltas Unified School District to issue $25 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including science and technology classrooms, safety systems, and accessibility improvements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $1.7 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.481438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.016869", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1490, "fingerprint": "2024|202400507|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400507|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3de3e73319eda5a1", "measure_id": "202400507", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve school safety and security systems; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical; remove asbestos and lead pipes; and modernize classrooms, labs, and instructional technology to support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts and skilled trades; shall Fowler Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $44,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $50 per $100,000 assessed value ($3,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight and all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1120, "no_votes": 637, "total_votes": 1757, "percent_yes": 63.745019920318725, "percent_no": 36.254980079681275, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Fowler Unified School District to issue $44 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Fowler Unified School District to issue $44 million in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including safety systems, roof and plumbing repairs, asbestos and lead pipe removal, and classroom modernization. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of $50 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.480291", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.016220", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1494, "fingerprint": "2024|202400512|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400512|FRESNO", "content_hash": "038c4dc4dcb7d74d", "measure_id": "202400512", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To attract/retain qualified teachers; reduce overcrowding; upgrade security/fire safety; remove lead paint/asbestos; provide safe drinking water; repair deteriorating gas lines, heating/air condftioning, leaky roofs; upgrade career education classrooms/labs; shall Fresno Unified School District's measure authorizing $500,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation, raising $31,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring public spending disclosure, oversight, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63804, "no_votes": 35150, "total_votes": 98954, "percent_yes": 64.47844452978153, "percent_no": 35.52155547021847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Fresno Unified School District to issue $500 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Fresno Unified School District to issue $500 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including safety upgrades, infrastructure repairs, and classroom modernization. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $31 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.481713", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.017031", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1484, "fingerprint": "2024|202400162|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400162|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a1b310cd5efce741", "measure_id": "202400162", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Coalinga measure, which extends the already-adopted general\u00adpurpose, one-percent sales tax, expected to generate $850,000.00 annually, with annual independent audits with an expiration (sunset) of April 1, 2039, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1740, "no_votes": 1868, "total_votes": 3608, "percent_yes": 48.22616407982262, "percent_no": 51.77383592017738, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.367786", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.960882", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1495, "fingerprint": "2024|202400513|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400513|FRESNO", "content_hash": "e69561d7bf2a051e", "measure_id": "202400513", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of schools; replace outdated HVAC systems: construcV renovate/ modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health and safety and energy efficiency improvements; shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District's measure authorizing $20,000,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $1,100,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, at average rates of approximately $23.48 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3553, "no_votes": 2763, "total_votes": 6316, "percent_yes": 56.25395820139328, "percent_no": 43.74604179860672, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District to issue $20 million in bonds to replace HVAC systems, renovate classrooms and restrooms, modernize school facilities, and make health, safety and energy efficiency improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of approximately $23.48 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.482015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.017190", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1496, "fingerprint": "2024|202400514|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400514|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3397209b4c7b0e9e", "measure_id": "202400514", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of local schools; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize/ renovate/ construct classrooms, a kitchen, athletic and other school facilities; shall the Laton Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $9,700,000 of bonds at legal Interest rates be adopted, generating on average $565,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $57 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 489, "no_votes": 331, "total_votes": 820, "percent_yes": 59.63414634146341, "percent_no": 40.36585365853659, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Laton Joint Unified School District to issue $9,7...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Laton Joint Unified School District to issue $9,700,000 in bonds to fund school facility improvements including classroom modernization, kitchen and athletic facility construction, and health and safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $57 per $100,000 of assessed value, with oversight from an independent citizens' committee and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.482308", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.017340", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1498, "fingerprint": "2024|202400516|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400516|FRESNO", "content_hash": "47e2f04f9f25b85e", "measure_id": "202400516", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue Sanger Unified student success and reduce overcrowding by building/ completing new schools; providing facilities for college/ career preparation; upgrade vocational/ career/ classrooms/ labs/ athletics/ dual credit pathways and online learning technology; improve health, safety and security systems; shall Sanger Unified School District's measure authorizing $175,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying $60 per $100,000 assessed valuation, raising $10 million annually for issued bonds through maturity, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, all money used locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11580, "no_votes": 8510, "total_votes": 20090, "percent_yes": 57.64061722249876, "percent_no": 42.35938277750124, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Sanger Unified School District to issue $175 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Sanger Unified School District to issue $175 million in bonds to build new schools, upgrade classrooms and facilities, and improve safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $10 million annually until maturity.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.482877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.017648", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1482, "fingerprint": "2024|202400160|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400160|FRESNO", "content_hash": "1fc913c7006574a7", "measure_id": "202400160", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue generating approximately $263,965 annually to fund police and fire services where 80% of the special tax proceeds shall be used for police services and 20% shall be used for fire services, shall the measure levying $95/parcel for single \u00adfamily homes and specified amounts for multifamily, commercial, agricultural, and industrial parcels, known as Measure O, be adopted without expiration, with all funds generated staying in the City of Orange Cove?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 352, "no_votes": 178, "total_votes": 530, "percent_yes": 66.41509433962264, "percent_no": 33.58490566037736, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have levied a $95 annual parcel tax on single-family homes...", "summary_text": "This measure would have levied a $95 annual parcel tax on single-family homes (with specified amounts for other property types) to generate approximately $263,965 annually for police and fire services in Orange Cove, with 80% of proceeds funding police services and 20% funding fire services. The tax would have been permanent with no expiration date.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.367190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.960562", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1497, "fingerprint": "2024|202400515|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400515|FRESNO", "content_hash": "4482416b01071f17", "measure_id": "202400515", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of local schools; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms, athletic/ sports complex and other facilities; repair leaky roofs; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall the Parlier Unified School District measure authorizing $14,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating approximately $786,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at average tax rates of 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, Independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1829, "no_votes": 821, "total_votes": 2650, "percent_yes": 69.01886792452831, "percent_no": 30.98113207547169, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Parlier Unified School District to issue $14,100,...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Parlier Unified School District to issue $14,100,000 in bonds to modernize and construct school facilities, repair infrastructure, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $786,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.482581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.017490", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1500, "fingerprint": "2024|202400518|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400518|FRESNO", "content_hash": "6383623b0ec2fe87", "measure_id": "202400518", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade local colleges/education centers; improve nursing, paramedic, firefighter, police/agriculture/manufacturing and vocational training; fix leaky roofs, asbestos, lead paint; sewer lines; protect drinking water; acquire, constrnct, repair facilities, sites, equipment; shall State Center Community College District's measure authorizing $698,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation ($42,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with oversight, all fonds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 169082, "no_votes": 130223, "total_votes": 299305, "percent_yes": 56.4915387313944, "percent_no": 43.5084612686056, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the State Center Community College District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the State Center Community College District to issue $698 million in bonds to upgrade facilities, improve vocational training programs, and address infrastructure issues like roofs, plumbing, and hazardous materials. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 2 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $42 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.483447", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.017949", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1488, "fingerprint": "2024|202400166|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400166|FRESNO", "content_hash": "8c5bdf3d6d30a636", "measure_id": "202400166", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response, fire protection; funding protective breathing equipment/clothing for firefighters, investigating/preventing crimes, including against children, gang prevention; maintaining paramedics for life support/advanced medical care, by continuing Sanger's existing, voter-approved 3/4\u00a2 sales tax without changing rates, providing $3,200,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, all funds required to be spent only on public safety in Sanger, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5615, "no_votes": 1875, "total_votes": 7490, "percent_yes": 74.96662216288385, "percent_no": 25.03337783711615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues Sanger's existing 3/4-cent sales tax to fund emergency...", "summary_text": "This measure continues Sanger's existing 3/4-cent sales tax to fund emergency services including 9-1-1 response, fire protection, paramedic services, and crime prevention, generating approximately $3.2 million annually. The measure maintains the current tax rate without any increase and requires all funds to be spent only on public safety services within Sanger.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.368911", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.961474", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1489, "fingerprint": "2024|202400167|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400167|FRESNO", "content_hash": "672378c07eae5258", "measure_id": "202400167", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure establishing term limits for Selma Mayor and City Council Members be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5292, "no_votes": 1003, "total_votes": 6295, "percent_yes": 84.06671961874504, "percent_no": 15.93328038125496, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes term limits for the Mayor and City Council Members i...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes term limits for the Mayor and City Council Members in Selma, California. The specific term limit restrictions are not detailed in the provided ballot language.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.369230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.961631", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1499, "fingerprint": "2024|202400517|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400517|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3310b326a8d491c3", "measure_id": "202400517", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade/repair/modernize our local high school and alternative education facilities, including repairing heating/air conditioning and leaky roofs, removing asbestos/lead/mold, and making safety improvements, shall Sierra Unified School District's measure authorizing $24,150,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately $45 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $1.70 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3722, "no_votes": 1846, "total_votes": 5568, "percent_yes": 66.84626436781609, "percent_no": 33.15373563218391, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Sierra Unified School District to issue $24,150,000 i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Sierra Unified School District to issue $24,150,000 in bonds to upgrade, repair, and modernize high school and alternative education facilities, including fixing HVAC systems, roofs, and removing hazardous materials. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments of approximately $45 per $100,000 of assessed property value, with oversight provided by a citizens' committee and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.483175", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.017799", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1485, "fingerprint": "2024|202400163|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400163|FRESNO", "content_hash": "8ef1b477af46a1c5", "measure_id": "202400163", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 903, "no_votes": 736, "total_votes": 1639, "percent_yes": 55.09456985967053, "percent_no": 44.90543014032947, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changes the Fresno city clerk position from an elected office to...", "summary_text": "This measure changes the Fresno city clerk position from an elected office to one appointed by the city government. The measure passed, meaning the city clerk will now be appointed rather than chosen by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.368093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.961035", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1486, "fingerprint": "2024|202400164|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400164|FRESNO", "content_hash": "0a2b91d1028e5e75", "measure_id": "202400164", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 884, "no_votes": 696, "total_votes": 1580, "percent_yes": 55.949367088607595, "percent_no": 44.050632911392405, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changes the Fresno city treasurer position from an elected offic...", "summary_text": "This measure changes the Fresno city treasurer position from an elected office to one that is appointed by the city government. The measure passed, meaning the city treasurer will now be appointed rather than chosen by voters in elections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.368366", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.961182", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1491, "fingerprint": "2024|202400508|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400508|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3c163b568cd9a206", "measure_id": "202400508", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Central Unified School District's measure to improve student safety/ school security; rehabilitate/ expand classrooms, including vocational/ career technical education facilities; replace leaky roofs and ensure Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility, authorizing $109 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $50 per $100,000 assessed valuation while outstanding (raising $7 million annually) be adopted, with citizen oversight, no increase to estimated tax rates and public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16820, "no_votes": 9381, "total_votes": 26201, "percent_yes": 64.19602305255525, "percent_no": 35.80397694744475, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Central Unified School District to issue $109 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Central Unified School District to issue $109 million in bonds to fund school safety improvements, classroom rehabilitation and expansion, vocational facilities, roof repairs, and ADA accessibility upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging below $50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation and include citizen oversight and audit requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.480554", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.016369", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1483, "fingerprint": "2024|202400161|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400161|FRESNO", "content_hash": "182f95a67c0270c0", "measure_id": "202400161", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure maintaining 9-1-1 emergency medical/police/fire/paramedic response, fire protection, police patrols; keeping public areas safe/clean; retaining local small businesses/jobs; protecting local drinking water sources; accelerating repairs to streets/roads; addressing homelessness; maintaining youth, parks programs; and other general services, by establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $28,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring public spending disclosure, all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35686, "no_votes": 17638, "total_votes": 53324, "percent_yes": 66.9229615182657, "percent_no": 33.077038481734306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Fresno to fund various city se...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Fresno to fund various city services including emergency response, fire protection, police patrols, street repairs, homelessness programs, and parks, generating approximately $28 million annually. The tax continues until voters choose to end it and includes requirements for public spending disclosure and local spending of all funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.367471", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.960719", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1487, "fingerprint": "2024|202400165|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400165|FRESNO", "content_hash": "eda25a1b39bd5fec", "measure_id": "202400165", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the term of Office of Mayor be four years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 405, "no_votes": 259, "total_votes": 664, "percent_yes": 60.99397590361446, "percent_no": 39.00602409638554, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changes the term of office for Fresno's mayor from the current l...", "summary_text": "This measure changes the term of office for Fresno's mayor from the current length to four years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.368635", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.961328", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1503, "fingerprint": "2024|202400169|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400169|GLENN", "content_hash": "cee7595335b52632", "measure_id": "202400169", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "GLENN Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Willows enact a general transactions and use tax in the total amount of one and one-half percent (1.5%) to be used for the purpose of providing the citizens of Willows with critical city services including and not limited to, law enforcement, fire, emergency medical, public works, community development, recreation, administration, library, and finance, under local control and annual audits with a sunset date of fifteen years, be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1243, "no_votes": 815, "total_votes": 2058, "percent_yes": 60.39844509232264, "percent_no": 39.60155490767736, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 1", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 1.5% general sales tax in Willows, California to fund various city services including law enforcement, fire, emergency medical, public works, recreation, and library services. The tax has a 15-year sunset clause and requires annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.369869", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.961936", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "GLENN Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1502, "fingerprint": "2024|202400168|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400168|GLENN", "content_hash": "4608123325dc503a", "measure_id": "202400168", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "GLENN Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund Orland Ambulance Services, construction and maintenance of Orland Streets, Orland Parks and Recreation, and Orland Library Services, and other general funded City services, shall the measure to raise the current city sales tax rate of 0.5\u00a2 to 1.0\u00a2, providing approximately $1,500,000, annually, all money locally controlled, with published annual audits, starting April 1, 2025, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1707, "no_votes": 846, "total_votes": 2553, "percent_yes": 66.86251468860165, "percent_no": 33.13748531139835, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Orland's city sales tax rate from 0", "summary_text": "This measure increases Orland's city sales tax rate from 0.5 cents to 1.0 cent per dollar to fund ambulance services, street construction and maintenance, parks and recreation, library services, and other general city services. The tax would generate approximately $1.5 million annually starting April 1, 2025, and would remain in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.369565", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.961779", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "GLENN Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1505, "fingerprint": "2024|202400028|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400028|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "f6e8414f55dd5592", "measure_id": "202400028", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure changing local cannabis (marijuana) laws, including: new limits on the number of permitted grows; limiting new or expanded grows to 10,000 square feet, using natural light and artificial light of 6 or fewer watts per square foot, with restrictions on more or bigger buildings; new rules for water and generator use; prohibiting growers from holding multiple new permits; requiring at least one in-person, on-site inspection before yearly permit renewal; be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9224, "no_votes": 29537, "total_votes": 38761, "percent_yes": 23.797115657490778, "percent_no": 76.20288434250922, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed new restrictions on cannabis cultivation in H...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed new restrictions on cannabis cultivation in Humboldt County, including limiting grow operations to 10,000 square feet with lighting restrictions, capping the number of permits per grower, and requiring annual on-site inspections. The measure also would have established new regulations for water usage and generator use at cultivation sites.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.321824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.939209", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1512, "fingerprint": "2024|202400520|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400520|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "9debde8d6802332d", "measure_id": "202400520", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of educational facilities; replace deteriorating plumbing/sewer systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Arcata School District's measure be adopted to issue $12,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $751,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2745, "no_votes": 893, "total_votes": 3638, "percent_yes": 75.45354590434304, "percent_no": 24.546454095656955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Arcata School District to issue $12", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Arcata School District to issue $12.5 million in bonds to replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems, modernize classrooms and facilities, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.483997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.018270", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1504, "fingerprint": "2024|202400027|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400027|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "f7055e46bc167e67", "measure_id": "202400027", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The existing special tax for fire protection and emergency medical services will expire in 2024. Shall a replacement special tax for fire protection and emergency medical services be levied by the Fieldbrook Glendale Community Services District of $95.00 per assessor's parcel in Zone Two (2), the zone comprising the Fieldbrook Fire Department\u2019s response area, such tax to continue for ten (10) years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 390, "no_votes": 61, "total_votes": 451, "percent_yes": 86.47450110864744, "percent_no": 13.525498891352555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Fieldbrook Glendale Community Services District t...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Fieldbrook Glendale Community Services District to levy a $95 annual special tax per parcel in Zone Two to fund fire protection and emergency medical services for ten years. The tax replaces an existing special tax for the same services that was set to expire in 2024.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.321468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.938929", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1508, "fingerprint": "2024|202400031|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400031|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "8590ede4d2f27916", "measure_id": "202400031", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To ensure and maintain fire protection services and emergency medical response shall the Peninsula Community Service District Ordinance No. 2024-5.1, establishing a special tax until June 30, 2031, and raising an estimated $33,000 annually, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 153, "no_votes": 31, "total_votes": 184, "percent_yes": 83.15217391304348, "percent_no": 16.847826086956516, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a special tax in the Peninsula Community Service Dis...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a special tax in the Peninsula Community Service District to fund fire protection services and emergency medical response, raising an estimated $33,000 annually until June 30, 2031.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.322713", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.939673", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1509, "fingerprint": "2024|202400170|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400170|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "b364b151c3d60cd4", "measure_id": "202400170", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending Eureka's General Plan, creating an overlay designation for downtown that limits 21 City-owned lots, with exceptions, to parking at or above the current capacity and high-density housing, and creating an overlay designation for the former Jacobs Middle School site, allowing housing, public, quasi-public, and commercial uses, with at least 40% of non-public use area dedicated to high-density housing, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3490, "no_votes": 7913, "total_votes": 11403, "percent_yes": 30.605980882223978, "percent_no": 69.39401911777603, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended Eureka's General Plan to create two overlay de...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended Eureka's General Plan to create two overlay designations: one limiting 21 City-owned downtown lots to parking and high-density housing with some exceptions, and another for the former Jacobs Middle School site allowing mixed uses with at least 40% of non-public area dedicated to high-density housing.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.370137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.962089", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1513, "fingerprint": "2024|202400521|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400521|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "81e4e1cbc9efa5f2", "measure_id": "202400521", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renew and continue to support academic excellence for Arcata students, continue art, music and dance programs, maintain reduced class sizes, fund programs to support students and promote good health, and provide funds to support adequate site staffing, shall Arcata School District's measure be adopted renewing its existing parcel tax for eight years at the rate of $69 per parcel raising approximately $285,000 annually with exemptions including seniors and with local citizens' oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5423, "no_votes": 1153, "total_votes": 6576, "percent_yes": 82.46654501216545, "percent_no": 17.533454987834546, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews Arcata School District's existing parcel tax at $69 per p...", "summary_text": "This measure renews Arcata School District's existing parcel tax at $69 per parcel for eight years, generating approximately $285,000 annually to fund educational programs, staffing, and student services. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and requires local citizens' oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.484294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.018419", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1506, "fingerprint": "2024|202400029|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400029|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "c81b40f500a85fc1", "measure_id": "202400029", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and improve Arcata's essential city services and facilities, such as: emergency, disaster and climate change preparedness and response, services addressing homelessness and its impacts to the city, clinical mental health response to people in crisis, youth diversion counselor programs, sidewalks, bike lanes, transit, roads and trails, recreation and local parks, and other vital city programs,shall the City of Arcata enact a measure, by adopting a 3/4 cent sales tax, for general government purposes, providing approximately $2.6 million annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, citizens' oversight, annual audits, and all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5277, "no_votes": 2818, "total_votes": 8095, "percent_yes": 65.18838789376159, "percent_no": 34.811612106238414, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.75% sales tax in Arcata to fund general city services including emergency preparedness, homelessness services, mental health crisis response, infrastructure improvements, and parks and recreation. The tax is expected to generate approximately $2.6 million annually and includes requirements for public spending disclosure, citizen oversight, and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.322094", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.939369", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1517, "fingerprint": "2024|202400525|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400525|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "56a303d5e18400b6", "measure_id": "202400525", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade outdated facilities, classrooms, and labs used for job training and science/ technology education, deteriorating roofs, electrical wiring, and plumbing, and aging student housing; and acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment, shall Redwoods Community College District's measure be adopted authorizing $120,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, ($8,400,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with audits, independent oversight, and no money for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35301, "no_votes": 25555, "total_votes": 60856, "percent_yes": 58.00742736952807, "percent_no": 41.99257263047193, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Redwoods Community College District to issue $120...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Redwoods Community College District to issue $120 million in bonds to repair and upgrade facilities, classrooms, labs, roofs, electrical systems, plumbing, and student housing, as well as acquire new facilities and equipment. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.485599", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.019024", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1515, "fingerprint": "2024|202400523|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400523|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "883f6352af57e248", "measure_id": "202400523", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Ferndale Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $9,800,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $549,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding from levies of approximately $60 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 898, "no_votes": 754, "total_votes": 1652, "percent_yes": 54.35835351089588, "percent_no": 45.64164648910412, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Ferndale Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Ferndale Unified School District to issue $9.8 million in bonds to fund facility repairs, safety improvements, and modernization of classrooms and other school buildings. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.484856", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.018723", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1514, "fingerprint": "2024|202400522|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400522|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "9a0802c365d5ca9c", "measure_id": "202400522", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve technology in schools; replace outdated heating and cooling systems; and make health, safety and security improvements, shall Cutten School District's measure authorizing $5,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $318,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1548, "no_votes": 1181, "total_votes": 2729, "percent_yes": 56.72407475265665, "percent_no": 43.27592524734335, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Cutten School District to issue $5 million in bon...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Cutten School District to issue $5 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, technology, heating and cooling systems, and make health and safety improvements to school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising about $318,000 annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.484589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.018571", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1511, "fingerprint": "2024|202400172|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400172|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "4f9dcfe19ddd390e", "measure_id": "202400172", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a \u00be cent transaction and use tax be continued in the City of Trinidad for four years, starting on April 1, 2025?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 145, "no_votes": 70, "total_votes": 215, "percent_yes": 67.44186046511628, "percent_no": 32.55813953488372, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure continues a 0", "summary_text": "The measure continues a 0.75 cent sales and use tax in the City of Trinidad for four years beginning April 1, 2025. The tax extension passed with 50.7% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.370737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.962388", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1516, "fingerprint": "2024|202400524|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400524|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "4da6ca20af9e5a48", "measure_id": "202400524", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of McKinleyville elementary and middle schools; replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; upgrade deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; make health and safety improvements; shall McKinleyville Union School District's measure authorizing $18,500,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $1,000,000 annually, at average rates of $28.60 per $100,000 assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4918, "no_votes": 3157, "total_votes": 8075, "percent_yes": 60.90402476780186, "percent_no": 39.09597523219814, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the McKinleyville Union School District to issue $18", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the McKinleyville Union School District to issue $18.5 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof replacements, classroom and restroom modernization, plumbing upgrades, and health and safety improvements at elementary and middle schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging $28.60 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.485247", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.018874", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1507, "fingerprint": "2024|202400030|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400030|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "6e3d8faee76b380c", "measure_id": "202400030", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain 9-1-1 response times/ prepare for natural disasters by: repairing deteriorating county roads/bridges; fixing potholes; maintaining evacuation routes; bus services; becoming eligible for Humboldt's fair share of state/federal roads funding, shall a measure enacting a one-cent sales tax, generating approximately $24,000,000 annually for general government purposes, until ended by voters, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, public disclosure, all funds used only for local services be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39211, "no_votes": 22629, "total_votes": 61840, "percent_yes": 63.40717981888745, "percent_no": 36.59282018111255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacts a one-cent sales tax in Humboldt County to generate appro...", "summary_text": "This measure enacts a one-cent sales tax in Humboldt County to generate approximately $24 million annually for general government purposes including road and bridge repairs, emergency services, and public transportation. The tax continues indefinitely until ended by voters and includes provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.322377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.939520", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1510, "fingerprint": "2024|202400171|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400171|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "f4fb13e19fa1b048", "measure_id": "202400171", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve and maintain essential services, including police services; nuisance abatement; streets, sidewalks, and drainage; park improvement; and programs for youth and seniors; shall the measure to increase the existing transaction and use tax from 0.75% to 1.5% through March 31, 2033 (unless sooner repealed), providing an additional $1.8 million in annual revenue, requiring an independent audit, and community oversight by the Measure E No Committee, with all funds remaining in Fortuna, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2164, "no_votes": 3029, "total_votes": 5193, "percent_yes": 41.67148083959176, "percent_no": 58.32851916040824, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.370438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.962239", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1518, "fingerprint": "2024|202400173|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400173|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "631ebf64a7bebc25", "measure_id": "202400173", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall RAUL URE\u00d1A be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember of the City of Calexico?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3971, "no_votes": 1525, "total_votes": 5496, "percent_yes": 72.25254730713246, "percent_no": 27.74745269286754, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure recalled Raul Ure\u00f1a from his position as City Councilmember of th...", "summary_text": "The measure recalled Raul Ure\u00f1a from his position as City Councilmember of the City of Calexico. The recall passed, removing Ure\u00f1a from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-04-16", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.371081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.962544", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1519, "fingerprint": "2024|202400174|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400174|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "13489cf104ff8bf2", "measure_id": "202400174", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure 2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall GILBERTO MANZANAREZ be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember of the City of Calexico?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3878, "no_votes": 1569, "total_votes": 5447, "percent_yes": 71.19515329539196, "percent_no": 28.80484670460804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Gilberto Manzanarez from h...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Gilberto Manzanarez from his position as City Councilmember of Calexico. The recall passed, removing Manzanarez from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-04-16", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.371383", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.962693", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure 2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1524, "fingerprint": "2024|202400527|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400527|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "5e37085764e2530d", "measure_id": "202400527", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall the Heber Elementary School District measure be adopted authorizing $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interst rates, generating approximately $255,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, at average rates of approximately $29 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1333, "no_votes": 625, "total_votes": 1958, "percent_yes": 68.07967313585291, "percent_no": 31.920326864147086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Heber Elementary School District to issue $4,000,...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Heber Elementary School District to issue $4,000,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and restroom modernization, roof repairs, and health and safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of approximately $29 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating about $255,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.486415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.019325", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1521, "fingerprint": "2024|202400176|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400176|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "a6ef63dfcc70f1f5", "measure_id": "202400176", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 378, "no_votes": 469, "total_votes": 847, "percent_yes": 44.62809917355372, "percent_no": 55.37190082644628, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.371987", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.962993", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1520, "fingerprint": "2024|202400175|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400175|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "bfb51b267a8bb671", "measure_id": "202400175", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure maintaining 911 emergency response, fire protection, firefighter paramedics, neighborhood police patrols, gang/drug prevention; keeping parks/public areas safe/clean, addressing homelessness; repairing streets/roads, potholes; retaining/attracting local small businesses; upgrading local water infrastructure, general government use, by establishing a 1% sales tax providing estimated $3,800,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, public spending disclosure, all funds for Brawley, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5011, "no_votes": 2644, "total_votes": 7655, "percent_yes": 65.46048334421947, "percent_no": 34.53951665578053, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1% sales tax in Brawley, California, generating an...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1% sales tax in Brawley, California, generating an estimated $3,800,000 annually to fund various city services including emergency response, fire protection, police patrols, parks maintenance, street repairs, and water infrastructure upgrades. The tax continues until voters choose to end it and requires independent audits and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.371691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.962841", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1525, "fingerprint": "2024|202400528|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400528|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "396bcb9a202b84c9", "measure_id": "202400528", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; modernize, construct, or expand school facilities including an aquatic center and gym for community use; make health, and safety and security improvements; shall Imperial Unified School District's measure authorizing $70,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating approximately $4,036,000 annually with annual levies averaging $52 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4362, "no_votes": 3664, "total_votes": 8026, "percent_yes": 54.34836780463493, "percent_no": 45.65163219536507, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Imperial Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Imperial Unified School District to issue $70 million in bonds to modernize, construct, or expand school facilities including an aquatic center and gym, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies averaging $52 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.486864", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.019478", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1523, "fingerprint": "2024|202400526|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400526|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "d536a32c0c6a887e", "measure_id": "202400526", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and construct a gymnasium for school and community use; shall Brawley Elementary School District's measure authorizing $20,000,000 of bonds be adopted at legal rates, generating on average $1,200,000 per year while bonds are outstanding, at rates of approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent oversight, NO money for salaries, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4381, "no_votes": 3450, "total_votes": 7831, "percent_yes": 55.944323841144175, "percent_no": 44.055676158855825, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Brawley Elementary School District to issue $20 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Brawley Elementary School District to issue $20 million in bonds to fund educational improvements, health and safety upgrades, handicapped accessibility improvements, and construction of a gymnasium. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.485965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.019173", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1522, "fingerprint": "2024|202400177|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400177|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "1d88be70894e621e", "measure_id": "202400177", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 375, "no_votes": 471, "total_votes": 846, "percent_yes": 44.32624113475177, "percent_no": 55.67375886524823, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.372253", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.963143", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1527, "fingerprint": "2024|202400530|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400530|INYO", "content_hash": "786531d30a0bb852", "measure_id": "202400530", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "INYO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Bishop Unified School District\u2019s measure to repair/ replace deteriorating plumbing, roofs, electrical heating and air- conditioning systems and update career training facilities classrooms, and Bishop Union High School\u2019s historic main building be adopted authorizing $46.3 million with legal rates audits, average levies below $52 per $100 000 of assessed valuation (raising $2.9 million annually) while outstanding, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries \u2018and full disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3868, "no_votes": 2180, "total_votes": 6048, "percent_yes": 63.955026455026456, "percent_no": 36.044973544973544, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Bishop Unified School District to issue $46", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Bishop Unified School District to issue $46.3 million in bonds to repair and replace infrastructure including plumbing, roofs, electrical systems, and HVAC, as well as update career training facilities and the historic main building at Bishop Union High School. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below $52 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $2.9 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.487737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.019792", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "INYO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1526, "fingerprint": "2024|202400529|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400529|INYO", "content_hash": "2b5e45b35259e1c6", "measure_id": "202400529", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "INYO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Bishop Unified School District\u2019s measure to replace leaky roofs; repair/replace inefficient heating and air-conditioning systems; renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student safety be adopted, authorizing $14.2 million with legal rates, audits, average levies below $18 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $873,900 annually) while outstanding, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and full disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3740, "no_votes": 1981, "total_votes": 5721, "percent_yes": 65.37318650585561, "percent_no": 34.626813494144386, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Bishop Unified School District to issue $14", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Bishop Unified School District to issue $14.2 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof replacements, HVAC system repairs, classroom and restroom renovations, and safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging below $18 per $100,000 of assessed valuation annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.487284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.019626", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "INYO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1529, "fingerprint": "2024|202400532|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400532|INYO", "content_hash": "a452fb5d39d5fe5e", "measure_id": "202400532", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "INYO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To replace leaky roofs; construct/modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities,\u00b7 and make health, safety and security improvements; shall the Owens Valley Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $7,500,000 of bonds, at legal rates, raising on average $402,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4.900 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for administrator salaries and all money spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 215, "no_votes": 115, "total_votes": 330, "percent_yes": 65.15151515151516, "percent_no": 34.848484848484844, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Owens Valley Unified School District to issue $7,...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Owens Valley Unified School District to issue $7,500,000 in bonds to replace roofs, construct and renovate classrooms and facilities, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 4.900 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising an average of $402,000 annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.488547", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.020115", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "INYO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1528, "fingerprint": "2024|202400531|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400531|INYO", "content_hash": "5c5e1a718445af3c", "measure_id": "202400531", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "INYO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To replace HVAC systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace leaky roofs; and make health, safety and security improvements, shall the Lone Pine Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $7,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, raising on average $434,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $27.50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for administrator salaries and all money spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 619, "no_votes": 384, "total_votes": 1003, "percent_yes": 61.7148554336989, "percent_no": 38.2851445663011, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Lone Pine Unified School District to issue $7,500...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Lone Pine Unified School District to issue $7,500,000 in bonds to replace HVAC systems, modernize classrooms and facilities, repair roofs, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $27.50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, with independent oversight and annual audits required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.488182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.019955", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "INYO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1532, "fingerprint": "2024|202400178|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400178|KERN", "content_hash": "4d5c944b846758b4", "measure_id": "202400178", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to extend the City\u2019s special parcel tax on all real property within the City of California City, in an annual amount not to exceed $146.00, estimated to generate approximately $5.2 million annually, expiring in five (5) years, solely to fund essential public services, limited to city administrative expenses, personnel services, operations and maintenance, equipment, vehicles, supplies, capital outlays, law enforcement, fire\u00a0protection, emergency medical services, and code enforcement, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 777, "no_votes": 978, "total_votes": 1755, "percent_yes": 44.27350427350427, "percent_no": 55.72649572649573, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.372531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.963293", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1544, "fingerprint": "2024|202400539|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400539|KERN", "content_hash": "8885d50d9f5c4a9a", "measure_id": "202400539", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To retain teachers/ maintain quality local schools by upgrading older schools; ensuring school safety/ earthquake preparedness; fixing/ replacing leaky roofs, windows, plumbing; updating science, technology, engineering, math classrooms; qualifying for United States Department of Defense matching funds, shall Sierra Sands Unified School District's measure be adopted issuing $42,000,000 in bonds at limited interest rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation ($3,100,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, no money for administrators' salaries, requiring audits/ citizens oversight, all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9146, "no_votes": 5719, "total_votes": 14865, "percent_yes": 61.527077026572485, "percent_no": 38.472922973427515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Sierra Sands Unified School District to issue $42 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Sierra Sands Unified School District to issue $42 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including upgrades to older schools, safety and earthquake preparedness measures, infrastructure repairs, and STEM classroom updates. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $3.1 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.490588", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.021199", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1538, "fingerprint": "2024|202400533|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400533|KERN", "content_hash": "7b1d976085924c08", "measure_id": "202400533", "measure_letter": "C/AVH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure C/AVH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local high schools, upgrade vocational classrooms/ labs/ technology for skilled trades, science, engineering, math, aerospace education, practical career skills; fix deteriorating gas/ sewer lines, leaky roofs, ensure safe drinking water; upgrade student/ school safety; attract/retain quality teachers; shall Antelope Valley Union High School District's measure authorizing $398,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents per $100 assessed value, raising $25,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, spending disclosure, local control?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 2, "percent_yes": 50.0, "percent_no": 50.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Antelope Valley Union High School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Antelope Valley Union High School District to issue $398 million in bonds to fund improvements to high school facilities, including upgrading vocational classrooms and technology, fixing infrastructure issues like gas lines and roofs, and enhancing safety systems. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of 2 cents per $100 of assessed property value, generating approximately $25 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.488818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.020277", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure C/AVH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1546, "fingerprint": "2024|202400541|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400541|KERN", "content_hash": "c0bc46592cb78f37", "measure_id": "202400541", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To attract quality teachers and prepare students for careers / college by upgrading school safety, active shooter preparedness, fire systems, vocational job training / gym facilities; provide safe drinking water; acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment shall Wasco Union High School District's measure authorizing $35,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3rt per $100 assessed valuation, raising $2,700,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring oversight / spending disclosures, all funds for Wasco Union High School?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3250, "no_votes": 1757, "total_votes": 5007, "percent_yes": 64.90912722188935, "percent_no": 35.09087277811065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Wasco Union High School District to issue $35,400...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Wasco Union High School District to issue $35,400,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including safety systems, vocational training facilities, and infrastructure repairs, funded through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation. The measure passed, enabling the district to raise approximately $2,700,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.491126", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.021598", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1545, "fingerprint": "2024|202400540|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400540|KERN", "content_hash": "7e01ca861ccfa292", "measure_id": "202400540", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade science, technology, engineering, arts and math classrooms, repair leaky roofs, improve student safety/security, build a new school to reduce overcrowding, improve vocational/career classrooms, renovate plumbing, fire safety and electrical systems, remove asbestos and ensure clean drinking water, shall Southern Kern Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $59,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, $60 per $100,000 assessed value, raising $3,910,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money controlled locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4304, "no_votes": 3063, "total_votes": 7367, "percent_yes": 58.422695805619654, "percent_no": 41.577304194380346, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Southern Kern Unified School District to issue $5...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Southern Kern Unified School District to issue $59 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including classroom upgrades, roof repairs, safety enhancements, construction of a new school, and infrastructure renovations. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $3.9 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.490859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.021444", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1539, "fingerprint": "2024|202400534|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400534|KERN", "content_hash": "38db42520923a8fc", "measure_id": "202400534", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update school facilities with modern technology, repair roofs, make path of travel and play surface improvements, and renovate classrooms and other school facilities, shall the Buttonwillow Union School District measure authorizing $4,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately $15.00 per $100,000 of assessed vctluation (raising $301,190 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 230, "no_votes": 105, "total_votes": 335, "percent_yes": 68.65671641791045, "percent_no": 31.343283582089555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Buttonwillow Union School District to issue $4,00...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Buttonwillow Union School District to issue $4,000,000 in bonds to update school facilities with modern technology, repair roofs, improve accessibility and play surfaces, and renovate classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $15 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising about $301,190 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.489116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.020428", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1540, "fingerprint": "2024|202400535|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400535|KERN", "content_hash": "9c9d1980d612447b", "measure_id": "202400535", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Delano Union School District be authorized to issue up to $41.8 million in bonds to fund improvements to school facilities?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6801, "no_votes": 2074, "total_votes": 8875, "percent_yes": 76.63098591549296, "percent_no": 23.369014084507043, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.489429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.020578", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1541, "fingerprint": "2024|202400536|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400536|KERN", "content_hash": "1035760ac1827f44", "measure_id": "202400536", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/replace deteriorating roofs/plumbing/electrical systems; improve safety/security systems and disability access; remove asbestos and lead pipes; upgrade older classrooms, labs, school facilities to support student achievement in math, science engineering, arts and technology; shall Fruitvale School District's measure authorizing $36,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying average rates of 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (estimated $2,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5257, "no_votes": 3372, "total_votes": 8629, "percent_yes": 60.92247073820837, "percent_no": 39.07752926179163, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Fruitvale School District to issue $36 million in ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Fruitvale School District to issue $36 million in bonds to fund facility repairs, safety improvements, and classroom upgrades including roof/plumbing/electrical repairs, asbestos removal, and modernization of labs and classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.489706", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.020725", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1542, "fingerprint": "2024|202400537|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400537|KERN", "content_hash": "01f726223391553f", "measure_id": "202400537", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ improve aging neighborhood schools; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, infrastructure; remove asbestos and lead pipes; improve school safety and security systems; construct/ upgrade school facilities/ classrooms to support student achievement in science, math, literacy, and technology shall the Greenfield Union School District measure authorizing $25,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (averaging $2,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8807, "no_votes": 2948, "total_votes": 11755, "percent_yes": 74.92131008081667, "percent_no": 25.078689919183333, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Greenfield Union School District to issue $25 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Greenfield Union School District to issue $25 million in bonds to repair and improve school facilities, including fixing roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, removing hazardous materials, upgrading safety systems, and constructing new classrooms and facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.490013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.020885", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1543, "fingerprint": "2024|202400538|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400538|KERN", "content_hash": "121bb25f7b936db0", "measure_id": "202400538", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve school safety/security systems; repair, modernize, construct classrooms, science labs, and school facilities to reduce overcrowding/ support student achievement in science, technology, engineering, arts, math; replace aging portables, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, infrastructure/electrical; shall Rosedale Union School District's measure authorizing $52,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $19 per $100,000 assessed value ($3,200,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12529, "no_votes": 12529, "total_votes": 25058, "percent_yes": 50.0, "percent_no": 50.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Rosedale Union School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Rosedale Union School District to issue $52 million in bonds to improve school safety systems, repair and modernize classrooms and facilities, and replace aging infrastructure. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of $19 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.490311", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.021049", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1533, "fingerprint": "2024|202400179|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400179|KERN", "content_hash": "ea9727042c1b9659", "measure_id": "202400179", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax for general government use to maintain the City of California City's vital services, such as maintaining neighborhood police patrols, fire protection, 911 emergency response times, maintaining crime suppression and investigation, city streets and pothole repair, parks and recreation, job creation and economic improvement programs, senior and youth services, and generating approximately $700,000 annually, in perpetuity, with regular financial audits, independent citizens' oversight, and requiring funds be used locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2456, "no_votes": 1451, "total_votes": 3907, "percent_yes": 62.861530586127465, "percent_no": 37.138469413872535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in California City to fund genera...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in California City to fund general city services including police, fire, emergency response, street maintenance, parks, and various community programs, generating approximately $700,000 annually. The measure includes provisions for financial audits, citizen oversight, and requires the funds to be used locally.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.372845", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.963453", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1535, "fingerprint": "2024|202400181|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400181|KERN", "content_hash": "d9c77290910d171e", "measure_id": "202400181", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain local funding for essential ervices including: Police and Fire/Emergency Medical Service response, street/road repair, and park maintenance in the City of McFarland, shall a measure expanding the definition of hotel to include campgrounds, amending the definition of \"Tax Administrator\" to the Finance Director, and increasing the existing Transient Occupancy Tax (paid by hotel/lodging guests) from 6% to 12%, providing an estimated $500,000 annually, with independent audits, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1252, "no_votes": 973, "total_votes": 2225, "percent_yes": 56.26966292134832, "percent_no": 43.73033707865168, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases McFarland's transient occupancy tax from 6% to 12%, ex...", "summary_text": "This measure increases McFarland's transient occupancy tax from 6% to 12%, expands the tax to include campgrounds, and designates the Finance Director as tax administrator, generating an estimated $500,000 annually for police, fire, street repair, and park maintenance services. The tax will remain in effect until ended by voters and includes provisions for independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.373409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.963762", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1536, "fingerprint": "2024|202400182|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400182|KERN", "content_hash": "b57cd8a341523a9e", "measure_id": "202400182", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain local funding for essential services including: Police and Fire/Emergency Medical Service response, street/road repair, and park maintenance in the City of McFarland, shall a measure establishing a 5% utility user tax on gas, electricity, video, telecommunication services, providing an estimated $750,000 annually, with independent audits, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1422, "no_votes": 803, "total_votes": 2225, "percent_yes": 63.91011235955057, "percent_no": 36.08988764044943, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 5% utility user tax on gas, electricity, video, an...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 5% utility user tax on gas, electricity, video, and telecommunication services in McFarland, California, generating an estimated $750,000 annually for police, fire/emergency medical services, street repair, and park maintenance. The tax includes provisions for independent audits and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.373701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.963912", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1530, "fingerprint": "2024|202400032|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400032|KERN", "content_hash": "2229c55a6067898a", "measure_id": "202400032", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the order adopted on May 15, 2024, by the Kern County Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the formation of a district in the territory described, known as the Lost Hills Community Services District and the dissolution of County Service Area 91 be conditionally approved subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 179, "no_votes": 55, "total_votes": 234, "percent_yes": 76.49572649572649, "percent_no": 23.504273504273513, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Incorporation/Formation/Annexation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure conditionally approved the formation of the Lost Hills Community...", "summary_text": "This measure conditionally approved the formation of the Lost Hills Community Services District and the dissolution of County Service Area 91, as ordered by the Kern County Local Agency Formation Commission on May 15, 2024.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.323000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.939863", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1531, "fingerprint": "2024|202400033|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400033|KERN", "content_hash": "174594ba9b30d4db", "measure_id": "202400033", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the order adopted on May 15, 2024, by the Kern County Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the formation of a district in the territory described, known as the Lost Hills Community Services District and the dissolution of County Service Area 91 be conditionally approved subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 138, "no_votes": 96, "total_votes": 234, "percent_yes": 58.97435897435898, "percent_no": 41.02564102564102, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Incorporation/Formation/Annexation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure conditionally approved the formation of the Lost Hills Community...", "summary_text": "This measure conditionally approved the formation of the Lost Hills Community Services District and the dissolution of County Service Area 91, as ordered by the Kern County Local Agency Formation Commission on May 15, 2024.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.323374", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.940021", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1537, "fingerprint": "2024|202400183|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400183|KERN", "content_hash": "9791aa9b1d54be45", "measure_id": "202400183", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prevent cuts/ maintain City of Ridgecrest services, such as: repair potholes/ city streets; 9-1-1 emergency/ medical response times; neighborhood police patrols; attract/retain local business/ jobs; and for general government use, shall the City of Ridgecrest measure reauthorizing a previously voter approved 1 \u00a2 sales tax with no tax increase, providing $6,500,000 annually, until ended by voters, with independent oversight/ audits, all funds for City of Ridgecrest, no funds for Sacramento, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7863, "no_votes": 3611, "total_votes": 11474, "percent_yes": 68.52884782987624, "percent_no": 31.47115217012376, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reauthorizes an existing 1-cent sales tax in Ridgecrest to fund ...", "summary_text": "This measure reauthorizes an existing 1-cent sales tax in Ridgecrest to fund city services including street repairs, emergency response, police patrols, and general government operations, generating approximately $6.5 million annually. The measure maintains the current tax rate without any increase and includes provisions for independent oversight and audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.374057", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.964060", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1534, "fingerprint": "2024|202400180|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400180|KERN", "content_hash": "b36b33be75165b7d", "measure_id": "202400180", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall there be enacted in the City of Maricopa an additional temporary sales tax rate increase of one percent (1.00%) which will end after ten (10) years, the proceeds of which shall be used to preserve essential general governmental services including, but not limited to street and road improvements, police and fire protection, parks and recreation and other City General Fund services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 168, "no_votes": 151, "total_votes": 319, "percent_yes": 52.66457680250783, "percent_no": 47.33542319749217, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure enacted a temporary 1% sales tax increase in the City of ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure enacted a temporary 1% sales tax increase in the City of Maricopa that will last for 10 years, with proceeds designated for general governmental services including street and road improvements, police and fire protection, parks and recreation, and other general fund services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.373143", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.963612", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1550, "fingerprint": "2024|202400542|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400542|KINGS", "content_hash": "039345ef70456dab", "measure_id": "202400542", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; construct/ modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; build a new school to reduce overcrowding; and replace portables with permanent classrooms; shall the Armona Union Elementary School District measure authorizing $9,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating approximately $532,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at average rates of $29 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizen oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1252, "no_votes": 691, "total_votes": 1943, "percent_yes": 64.43643849716932, "percent_no": 35.56356150283068, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Armona Union Elementary School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Armona Union Elementary School District to issue $9,000,000 in bonds to construct and modernize school facilities, build a new school, and replace portable classrooms with permanent ones. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of $29 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $532,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.491393", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.021750", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1547, "fingerprint": "2024|202400184|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400184|KINGS", "content_hash": "a51fc95e98023710", "measure_id": "202400184", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance 2024-01 be adopted, (1) authorizing a vacancy tax on unused or unoccupied commercial spaces and uninhabited residences in the City of Avenal, up to $1,000 per linear foot of frontage, (2) setting transient occupancy tax at 15%, and (3) creating a progressive rate structure that would set business license tax rates from .05% to .475% of gross receipts, generating undetermined revenue, potentially up to $84,000 annually, until repealed?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 579, "no_votes": 739, "total_votes": 1318, "percent_yes": 43.93019726858877, "percent_no": 56.06980273141123, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "0", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized a vacancy tax of up to $1,000 per linear f...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized a vacancy tax of up to $1,000 per linear foot on unused commercial and residential properties in Avenal, set the transient occupancy tax at 15%, and established progressive business license tax rates from 0.05% to 0.475% of gross receipts. The measure was projected to generate up to $84,000 annually in revenue for the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.374368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.964223", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1556, "fingerprint": "2024|202400550|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400550|KINGS", "content_hash": "2d9a5651e50f8a28", "measure_id": "202400550", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; make health, safety and security improvements; upgrade HVAC systems; and construct/ renovate/ modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Tulare Joint Union High School District's measure authorizing $80,000,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating on average $5,400,000 annually, at average rates of approximately $29 per $100,000 assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, all money staying local, with no projected increase to existing tax rates?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 7, "percent_yes": 71.42857142857143, "percent_no": 28.57142857142857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Tulare Joint Union High School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Tulare Joint Union High School District to issue $80 million in bonds to construct, renovate, and modernize school facilities, including classrooms, restrooms, and HVAC systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $29 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.493686", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.023039", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1548, "fingerprint": "2024|202400185|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400185|KINGS", "content_hash": "842ea83080c914a8", "measure_id": "202400185", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding that would remain local and cannot be taken by the State to preserve/improve essential city services including, police, fire, 911 emergency response, neighborhood police patrols, crime prevention; maintain city streets and parks; address homelessness; improve youth/senior programs; retain local jobs; and other general services, shall City of Hanford enact a 1% Transaction and Use Tax (Sales Tax), providing approximately $19,200,000 annually, until ended by voters,\u00b7 requiring annual independent audits and citizens' oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12781, "no_votes": 7439, "total_votes": 20220, "percent_yes": 63.20969337289812, "percent_no": 36.79030662710188, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacts a 1% sales tax in the City of Hanford to fund general city...", "summary_text": "The measure enacts a 1% sales tax in the City of Hanford to fund general city services including police, fire, emergency response, street maintenance, parks, homelessness programs, and youth/senior services, generating approximately $19.2 million annually. The tax includes provisions for annual independent audits and citizen oversight and continues until voters decide to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.374712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.964371", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1552, "fingerprint": "2024|202400544|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400544|KINGS", "content_hash": "e617b066d217bd0e", "measure_id": "202400544", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of schools; replace outdated HVAC systems; construcl/ renovate/ modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health and safety and energy efficiency improvements; shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District's measure authorizing $20,000,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $1,100,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, at average rates of approximately $23.48 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125, "no_votes": 192, "total_votes": 317, "percent_yes": 39.43217665615142, "percent_no": 60.56782334384858, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Kingsburg Joint Union High School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District to issue $20 million in bonds to replace HVAC systems, renovate classrooms and facilities, and make health, safety and energy efficiency improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an average rate of approximately $23.48 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.491997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.022100", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1553, "fingerprint": "2024|202400545|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400545|KINGS", "content_hash": "bbd5bc1053441bd6", "measure_id": "202400545", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of local schools; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize/ renovate/ construct classrooms, a kitchen, athletic and other school facilities; shall the Laton Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $9,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $565,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $57 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39, "no_votes": 51, "total_votes": 90, "percent_yes": 43.333333333333336, "percent_no": 56.666666666666664, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Laton Joint Unified School District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Laton Joint Unified School District to issue $9.7 million in bonds to modernize, renovate, and construct school facilities including classrooms, a kitchen, and athletic facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $57 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.492263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.022252", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1555, "fingerprint": "2024|202400549|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400549|KINGS", "content_hash": "915bc499287e90a4", "measure_id": "202400549", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade local colleges/education centers; improve nursing, paramedic, firefighter, police/agriculture/manufacturing and vocational training; fix leaky roofs, asbestos, lead paint; sewer lines; protect drinking water; acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment; shall State Center Community College District's measure authorizing $698,000,000 in bonds al legal rates, levying 2\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation ($42,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with oversight, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 105, "no_votes": 274, "total_votes": 379, "percent_yes": 27.70448548812665, "percent_no": 72.29551451187335, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the State Center Community College Distric...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the State Center Community College District to issue $698 million in bonds to upgrade facilities, improve vocational training programs, and address infrastructure issues like roofs, plumbing, and hazardous materials. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 2 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $42 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.493416", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.022849", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1554, "fingerprint": "2024|202400546|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400546|KINGS", "content_hash": "60a900963c70d333", "measure_id": "202400546", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure R1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Claudia Cazares be recalled (removed) from the office of the Governing Board Member, Reef-Sunset Unified School District, Trustee Area 1?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 182, "no_votes": 70, "total_votes": 252, "percent_yes": 72.22222222222221, "percent_no": 27.777777777777786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Claudia Cazares from her p...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Claudia Cazares from her position as a governing board member representing Trustee Area 1 of the Reef-Sunset Unified School District. The measure passed, resulting in her removal from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.492556", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.022401", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure R1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10974, "fingerprint": "2024|202400547|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400547|KINGS", "content_hash": "904371aa0178ae92", "measure_id": "202400547", "measure_letter": "R2", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure R2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Lilia Rizo be recalled (removed) from the office of the Governing Board Member, Reef-Sunset Unified School District, Trustee Area 2?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 209, "no_votes": 88, "total_votes": 297, "percent_yes": 70.37037037037037, "percent_no": 29.629629629629633, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Lilia Rizo from her position as a...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Lilia Rizo from her position as a governing board member representing Trustee Area 2 of the Reef-Sunset Unified School District. The recall passed, resulting in her removal from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.076739", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.492851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.022548", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure R2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10975, "fingerprint": "2024|202400548|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400548|KINGS", "content_hash": "4d50731319760a50", "measure_id": "202400548", "measure_letter": "R3", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure R3", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Lissette Padilla be recalled (removed) from the office of the Governing Board Member, Reef-Sunset Unified School District, Trustee Area 3?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 148, "no_votes": 66, "total_votes": 214, "percent_yes": 69.1588785046729, "percent_no": 30.8411214953271, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Lissette Padilla from her ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Lissette Padilla from her position as a Governing Board Member for Trustee Area 3 of the Reef-Sunset Unified School District. The measure passed, resulting in her removal from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.076928", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.493127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.022694", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure R3", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1549, "fingerprint": "2024|202400186|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400186|KINGS", "content_hash": "8e4da40dd5e26307", "measure_id": "202400186", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain a clean, safe community, with services such as 911 emergency response, police patrols, fire services, street and crosswalk repair, park and recreation programs, and to retain and attract businesses, shall the City of Lemoore adopt a measure establishing a 1 % sales tax providing approximately $3,850,000 annually until ended by voters, with all funds remaining in Lemoore and subject to an annual audit and citizens oversight committee to advise on use of the tax?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5638, "no_votes": 2780, "total_votes": 8418, "percent_yes": 66.97552862912805, "percent_no": 33.02447137087195, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1% sales tax in the City of Lemoore to generate ap...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1% sales tax in the City of Lemoore to generate approximately $3.85 million annually for general city services including emergency response, police, fire, street repair, and parks and recreation. The tax would continue indefinitely until ended by voters and would be subject to annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.375013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.964529", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1551, "fingerprint": "2024|202400543|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400543|KINGS", "content_hash": "f16a640151a921ed", "measure_id": "202400543", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade aging elementary and middle school facilities, make health, safety and security improvements, modernize outdated school facilities, and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms, shall the Hanford Elementary School District measure authorizing $23,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates be adopted, levying on average $18.12 per $100,000 assessed value (generating approximately $1,400,000 annually), while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight no money for administrators, and all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8423, "no_votes": 5502, "total_votes": 13925, "percent_yes": 60.488330341113105, "percent_no": 39.511669658886895, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Hanford Elementary School District to issue $23 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Hanford Elementary School District to issue $23 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, replace temporary buildings with permanent classrooms, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $18.12 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.491690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.021943", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1558, "fingerprint": "2024|202400551|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400551|LAKE", "content_hash": "d6c19a6989baf8df", "measure_id": "202400551", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LAKE Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize and upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; shall the Kelseyville Unified School District measure authorizing $35,500,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating on average $2.0 million annually while bonds are outstanding at a projected rate of approximately $60 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1748, "no_votes": 1758, "total_votes": 3506, "percent_yes": 49.85738733599543, "percent_no": 50.14261266400457, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Kelseyville Unified School District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Kelseyville Unified School District to issue $35.5 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including roofs, classrooms, restrooms, and plumbing systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating about $2 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.493963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.023194", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LAKE Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1559, "fingerprint": "2024|202400552|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400552|LAKE", "content_hash": "14c462d74f6fb21f", "measure_id": "202400552", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LAKE Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve quality of education; repair/ replace leaky roofs; modernize and upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; shall the Kelseyville Unified School District measure authorizing $36,000,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $2,100,000 annually, at projected average rates of approximately $56 per $100,000 assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2927, "no_votes": 2647, "total_votes": 5574, "percent_yes": 52.511661284535336, "percent_no": 47.488338715464664, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Kelseyville Unified School District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Kelseyville Unified School District to issue $36 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including roofs, classrooms, restrooms, and plumbing systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $56 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.494232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.023358", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LAKE Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1560, "fingerprint": "2024|202400553|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400553|LAKE", "content_hash": "cc2187201b728b36", "measure_id": "202400553", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LAKE Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To expand and renovate career technical education classrooms and labs; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and security improvements, shall the Konocti Unified School District measure authorizing $50,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, be adopted, levying approximately 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation (raising on average $2,900,000 annually) until bonds are repaid, with annual audits, independent oversight, NO money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4191, "no_votes": 2791, "total_votes": 6982, "percent_yes": 60.02578057863076, "percent_no": 39.97421942136924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Konocti Unified School District to issue $50 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Konocti Unified School District to issue $50 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including career technical education expansion, roof repairs, classroom modernization, and health and safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating an average of $2.9 million annually until repaid.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.494503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.023507", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LAKE Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1557, "fingerprint": "2024|202400034|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400034|LAKE", "content_hash": "9b53a26268ca7f05", "measure_id": "202400034", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LAKE Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Shall the following Measure be adopted? Shall the Board of Supervisors recommend approval of the proposal to change the name of the town of \"Kelseyville\" to \"Konocti.\"", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7474, "no_votes": 17934, "total_votes": 25408, "percent_yes": 29.41593198992443, "percent_no": 70.58406801007557, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.323657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.940174", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LAKE Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1561, "fingerprint": "2024|202400035|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400035|LASSEN", "content_hash": "1e77f410a1ad7176", "measure_id": "202400035", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LASSEN Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Board of Supervisors of the County of Lassen establish the consolidated Office of Director of Finance, to perform the duties of Auditor, Controller, Tax Collector and Treasurer and make the office effective upon the expiration of the current term of office of those offices?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1457, "no_votes": 5115, "total_votes": 6572, "percent_yes": 22.169811320754718, "percent_no": 77.83018867924528, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked whether Lassen County should consolidate the sepa...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked whether Lassen County should consolidate the separate offices of Auditor, Controller, Tax Collector, and Treasurer into a single Office of Director of Finance position. The consolidation would have taken effect when the current terms of the existing offices expired.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.323964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.940326", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LASSEN Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1562, "fingerprint": "2024|202400036|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400036|LASSEN", "content_hash": "51b8ad0cd8e04490", "measure_id": "202400036", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LASSEN Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) If the Board of Supervisors should establish the consolidated Office of Director of Finance, should the position be appointed by the Board to serve a four-year term from the time of appointment?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1650, "no_votes": 4701, "total_votes": 6351, "percent_yes": 25.980160604629194, "percent_no": 74.01983939537081, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.324256", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.940479", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LASSEN Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1563, "fingerprint": "2024|202400037|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400037|LASSEN", "content_hash": "87554d97d082f64f", "measure_id": "202400037", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LASSEN Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a transactions and use tax in the amount of one percent (1%) on all qualifying transactions in the unincorporated area of County of Lassen (not the City of Susanville), the proceeds of which could only be used for public safety (public safety is defined as Lassen County Sheriff, Fire, Lassen County Office of Emergency Services, Lassen County Probation, Lassen County District Attorney and Lassen County Code Enforcement services, including, but not limited to, the wages, salaries, benefits, training and equipment for personnel and public safety communications needs)?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5033, "no_votes": 5885, "total_votes": 10918, "percent_yes": 46.09818648104048, "percent_no": 53.90181351895952, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.324543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.940630", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LASSEN Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1564, "fingerprint": "2024|202400554|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400554|LASSEN", "content_hash": "47e96b79fcea55de", "measure_id": "202400554", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LASSEN Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local schools; construct/renovate a gymnasium/ multi-purpose room and other school facilities; update infrastructure including plumbing, electrical and water; install or repair HVAC; improve safety and security; shall the Shaffer Elementary School District measure authorizing $2,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying on average $30 per $100,000 assessed value, generating approximately $136,630 annually, while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, and no funds used for administrator salaries or pensions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 585, "no_votes": 406, "total_votes": 991, "percent_yes": 59.03128153380423, "percent_no": 40.96871846619577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Shaffer Elementary School District to issue $2 mi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Shaffer Elementary School District to issue $2 million in bonds to construct and renovate school facilities, including gymnasium improvements, infrastructure updates, and safety enhancements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.494772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.023666", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LASSEN Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10976, "fingerprint": "2024|202400188|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400188|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e23a53f218a5e7de", "measure_id": "202400188", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall City Charter be amended to allow the council to establish by ordinance the standards, procedures, rules or regulations relating to all aspects of the award and performance of contracts, including contracts for the construction of public improvements, such as compensation paid for performance of such work?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20300, "no_votes": 12429, "total_votes": 32729, "percent_yes": 62.02450426227505, "percent_no": 37.97549573772495, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Contracting/Bidding/Leasing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the Los Angeles City Charter to allow the city council to...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the Los Angeles City Charter to allow the city council to establish standards, procedures, and regulations for awarding and performing all city contracts, including public construction projects and compensation for such work.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.079740", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.375595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.964834", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1565, "fingerprint": "2024|202400038|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400038|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "492a7c0a812854d5", "measure_id": "202400038", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To require accountability and results, create affordable housing, support home ownership, provide rental assistance, increase mental health and addiction treatment, reduce and prevent homelessness; and provide services for children, families, veterans, domestic violence survivors, seniors, and disabled people experiencing homelessness; shall the measure repealing the Measure H tax and replacing it with a 1/2 cent sales tax, raising approximately $1,076,076,350 annually until voters decide to end it, with new audits and oversight, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1989295, "no_votes": 1453394, "total_votes": 3442689, "percent_yes": 57.7831747218526, "percent_no": 42.2168252781474, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure repeals an existing tax (Measure H) and replaces it with a half-...", "summary_text": "This measure repeals an existing tax (Measure H) and replaces it with a half-cent sales tax expected to raise approximately $1.08 billion annually to fund affordable housing, homelessness services, mental health and addiction treatment, and support services for various vulnerable populations. The measure includes provisions for audits and oversight and continues until voters decide to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.324838", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.940785", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1584, "fingerprint": "2024|202400206|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400206|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d76350834794cf89", "measure_id": "202400206", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance limiting the number of four- year terms that may be served by the members of the Cudahy City Council be limited to three (3) terms be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2795, "no_votes": 1298, "total_votes": 4093, "percent_yes": 68.28731981431713, "percent_no": 31.71268018568287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance limits members of the Cudahy City Council to serving a maximum ...", "summary_text": "The ordinance limits members of the Cudahy City Council to serving a maximum of three four-year terms.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.380902", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.967645", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1580, "fingerprint": "2024|202400201|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400201|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7e36e064046b27d1", "measure_id": "202400201", "measure_letter": "AAA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure AAA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure funding Artesia general services such as maintaining 911 emergency response, crime prevention programs involving thefts/burglaries, neighborhood sheriff patrols; repairing streets/potholes/sidewalks; cleaning/maintaining public areas; maintaining safe routes to schools programs, youth gang prevention programs and street lighting by enacting a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $2,500,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits/public spending disclosure/all funds benefit Artesia residents, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3619, "no_votes": 1670, "total_votes": 5289, "percent_yes": 68.42503308754017, "percent_no": 31.57496691245983, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.75 cent sales tax in Artesia to fund general city services including emergency response, crime prevention, street repairs, public area maintenance, and youth programs, generating approximately $2.5 million annually. The tax includes audit requirements and public spending disclosure, and will continue until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.379472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.966878", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure AAA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1629, "fingerprint": "2024|202400561|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400561|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dfa4e545c8020473", "measure_id": "202400561", "measure_letter": "ABC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure ABC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; make health, safety and security improvements; construct, modernize, and renovate classrooms, restrooms and schoolfacilities; upgrade outdated electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and sewer infrastructure; and replace leaky roofs; shall Burbank Unified School District's measureauthorizing $458,205,000 of bonds be adopted at legal rates, generating on average $30,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, at approximately$40.69 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent oversight, NO money for salaries, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29199, "no_votes": 16656, "total_votes": 45855, "percent_yes": 63.676807327445204, "percent_no": 36.323192672554796, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Burbank Unified School District to issue $458,205...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Burbank Unified School District to issue $458,205,000 in bonds to construct, modernize, and renovate school facilities and upgrade infrastructure including electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and sewer systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $40.69 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.496825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.024727", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure ABC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1638, "fingerprint": "2024|202400573|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400573|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6d187e77247494a5", "measure_id": "202400573", "measure_letter": "AC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure AC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renovate labs, nursing/vocational/job training classrooms; remove asbestos/mold; upgrade clean drinking water, electrical/sewer lines, infrastructure; improve safety/security; repair, construct, acquire educational facilities, sites, technology; shall Long Beach Community College District's measure authorizing $990,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, be adopted, levying $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating $55,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, oversight, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 127569, "no_votes": 56524, "total_votes": 184093, "percent_yes": 69.29595367558788, "percent_no": 30.70404632441212, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Long Beach Community College District to issue $9...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Long Beach Community College District to issue $990 million in bonds to renovate facilities, remove hazardous materials, upgrade infrastructure, and improve safety and security across the district. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $25 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating approximately $55 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.500515", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.026552", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure AC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1628, "fingerprint": "2024|202400560|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400560|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "360e4d335892e65b", "measure_id": "202400560", "measure_letter": "AS", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure AS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To keep Arcadia schools among California's best and prepare studentsfor college/careers; keep schools safe/clean; provide safe drinking water; improve security/fire safety; repair deteriorating gas lines/leaky roofs; removeasbestos/lead paint, shall Arcadia Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $358,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $60 per $100,000of assessed valuation, ($23,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring oversight/spending disclosure, audits, all funds for Arcadia schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13052, "no_votes": 8228, "total_votes": 21280, "percent_yes": 61.334586466165405, "percent_no": 38.665413533834595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Arcadia Unified School District to issue $358 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Arcadia Unified School District to issue $358 million in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including safety upgrades, repairs to gas lines and roofs, removal of hazardous materials, and facility maintenance. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.496530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.024577", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure AS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1582, "fingerprint": "2024|202400204|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400204|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5fc616c611d17f93", "measure_id": "202400204", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Bellflower City Charter to establish Bellflower as a charter city, which would give Bellflower more authority over city affairs and local laws to make sure they are tailored to the specific needs of the City; give the City more local control in determining land use; reduce the influence of outside agencies, including the State of California; and would require all changes to the charter be approved by voters, be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17740, "no_votes": 5092, "total_votes": 22832, "percent_yes": 77.697967764541, "percent_no": 22.302032235458995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes Bellflower as a charter city, which would provide th...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes Bellflower as a charter city, which would provide the city with greater local authority over municipal affairs, land use decisions, and local laws while reducing state oversight, and requires voter approval for future charter amendments.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.380335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.967346", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1603, "fingerprint": "2024|202400227|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400227|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9fc32611b2dfbf55", "measure_id": "202400227", "measure_letter": "BE", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure BE", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance, without increasing taxes on residents, updating/simplifying City of Monterey Park\u2019s 35-year-old business license tax rates, ensuring fairness to all businesses and helping fund general city services, including keeping public/business areas safe/clean; preventing crime/thefts; strengthening the local economy; by revising the tax rate to 0.00075 per $1,000 of gross receipts ($75 yearly minimum tax), generating approximately $1,200,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring spending disclosure, funds locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11937, "no_votes": 5002, "total_votes": 16939, "percent_yes": 70.47051183659012, "percent_no": 29.52948816340988, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure updates Monterey Park's business license tax structure by setting...", "summary_text": "The measure updates Monterey Park's business license tax structure by setting the rate at $0.75 per $1,000 of gross receipts with a $75 minimum annual tax, expected to generate approximately $1.2 million yearly for general city services. The ordinance includes spending disclosure requirements and keeps funds under local control until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.387319", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.970927", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure BE", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10986, "fingerprint": "2024|202400564|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400564|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "99b7d3965ce9d4a8", "measure_id": "202400564", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide neighborhood schools that meet current safety, health, and academic standards; remove asbestos and lead pipes; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, ventilation; and upgrade classrooms, labs, facilities, and technology to support student achievement in science, math, reading, technology, arts, and engineering; shall East Whittier City School District's measure authorizing $97,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($6,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, all money locally- controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20598, "no_votes": 11322, "total_votes": 31920, "percent_yes": 64.53007518796993, "percent_no": 35.46992481203007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the East Whittier City School District to issue $97 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the East Whittier City School District to issue $97 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including safety upgrades, asbestos and lead pipe removal, roof and infrastructure repairs, and classroom and technology modernization. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.093231", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.497704", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.025178", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1579, "fingerprint": "2024|202400199|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400199|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4258b46d2e638a58", "measure_id": "202400199", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Do you support the City of Lancaster exploring and potentially establishing a drug treatment program similar to Teen Challenge to address drug-related issues within our community?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7449, "no_votes": 4977, "total_votes": 12426, "percent_yes": 59.946885562530184, "percent_no": 40.053114437469816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asks whether the City of Lancaster should explore and p...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asks whether the City of Lancaster should explore and potentially establish a drug treatment program similar to Teen Challenge to address local drug-related issues. As an advisory measure, it provides guidance to city officials but does not legally require any specific action.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-04-09", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.378880", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.966580", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10984, "fingerprint": "2024|202400559|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400559|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4fbedbcad4b5e0b0", "measure_id": "202400559", "measure_letter": "C/AVH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure C/AVH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local high schools, upgrade vocational classrooms/labs/technology for skilledtrades, science, engineering, math, aerospace education, practical career skills; fix deteriorating gas/sewer lines, leaky roofs, ensure safe drinking water;upgrade student/school safety; attract/retain quality teachers; shall Antelope Valley Union High School District's measure authorizing $398,000,000 inbonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents per $100 assessed value, raising $25,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizenoversight, spending disclosure, local control?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78533, "no_votes": 44575, "total_votes": 123108, "percent_yes": 63.79195503135458, "percent_no": 36.20804496864542, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Antelope Valley Union High School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Antelope Valley Union High School District to issue $398 million in bonds to upgrade vocational classrooms, fix infrastructure problems like gas/sewer lines and roofs, and improve school safety. The bonds would be funded by a property tax levy of 2 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising approximately $25 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.092296", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.496212", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.024427", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure C/AVH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1583, "fingerprint": "2024|202400205|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400205|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f11abb4bb273a38c", "measure_id": "202400205", "measure_letter": "CA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Compton City Charter be amended to make the City Attorney an appointed position and possess at least ten years of municipal law experience?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13094, "no_votes": 9204, "total_votes": 22298, "percent_yes": 58.72275540407211, "percent_no": 41.27724459592789, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure amends the Compton City Charter to change the City Attorn...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure amends the Compton City Charter to change the City Attorney from an elected position to an appointed position and requires the City Attorney to have at least ten years of municipal law experience.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.380632", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.967498", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10985, "fingerprint": "2024|202400562|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400562|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "14c4ff78f3ec891a", "measure_id": "202400562", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair, construct, acquire educational facilities, sites, equipment; support career education for students/ workers/ veterans, firefighter/ police training; remove asbestos; upgrade science labs, computer technology, campus/ earthquake safety, handicap accessibility; provide community healthcare services/ training; shall Compton Community College District authorize $200,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $20 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating $16,150,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring audits, oversight, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49343, "no_votes": 22727, "total_votes": 72070, "percent_yes": 68.46538087970029, "percent_no": 31.53461912029971, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Compton Community College District to issue $200 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Compton Community College District to issue $200 million in bonds to repair and construct educational facilities, upgrade labs and technology, improve safety and accessibility, and support career education programs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $20 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating approximately $16.15 million annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.092858", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.497123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.024879", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1569, "fingerprint": "2024|202400189|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400189|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "936afef43eb15f44", "measure_id": "202400189", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Term limits for members of the City Council. Shall the ordinance limiting the number of four-year terms served by members of the Huntington Park City Council be limited to four consecutive terms prospectively? The ordinance provides that no person shall serve more than four consecutive terms in city council and any person who has served four terms may reset the four-term cap after abstaining from running in one general municipal Election?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2788, "no_votes": 885, "total_votes": 3673, "percent_yes": 75.90525456030493, "percent_no": 24.094745439695075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance limits Huntington Park City Council members to four consecutiv...", "summary_text": "This ordinance limits Huntington Park City Council members to four consecutive four-year terms, with the ability to reset the term limit after sitting out one general municipal election.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.375936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.964982", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1636, "fingerprint": "2024|202400571|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400571|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6033496a68a1bf62", "measure_id": "202400571", "measure_letter": "CL", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Local Classroom Funding Authority continue the levy of the parcel tax approved in November 2012 to protect academic quality in local K-12 schools; maintain math, science, English programs; provide education for students with disabilities/special needs; support computer technology and school security; prepare students for college/careers; retain excellent teachers; at existing rates, including inflation adjustments at the reported annual or other periodic percentage changes, rounded to the nearest hundredth of a cent?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34701, "no_votes": 9616, "total_votes": 44317, "percent_yes": 78.30178035516845, "percent_no": 21.698219644831553, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.499737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.026252", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1585, "fingerprint": "2024|202400207|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400207|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a3ffef5dfeb0a10a", "measure_id": "202400207", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain Downey's long-term financial stability and general city services such as 911 response and fire/police protection; prevent crimes/thefts; recruit/retain well-trained firefighters/police officers; help ensure children have safe places to play; repair streets/potholes; shall an ordinance establishing a 1/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $6,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, public spending disclosures/all funds locally controlled benefiting Downey residents, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26324, "no_votes": 12803, "total_votes": 39127, "percent_yes": 67.27834998849899, "percent_no": 32.72165001150101, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.25% sales tax in Downey, California to generate approximately $6 million annually for general city services including police, fire, 911 response, street repairs, and other municipal operations. The tax will remain in effect until ended by voters and includes requirements for audits and public spending disclosures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.381181", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.967817", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1595, "fingerprint": "2024|202400217|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400217|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b7b04b36b8ec1f08", "measure_id": "202400217", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure DD", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to establish an independent redistricting commission to redraw Council district lines every ten years in the City of Los Angeles?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 878639, "no_votes": 302811, "total_votes": 1181450, "percent_yes": 74.36954589699099, "percent_no": 25.630454103009015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to create an independent re...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to create an independent redistricting commission responsible for redrawing City Council district boundaries every ten years. The commission would replace the current system where the City Council itself handles redistricting.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.384283", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.969400", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure DD", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10981, "fingerprint": "2024|202400555|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400555|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e62782da3fe3eb5e", "measure_id": "202400555", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade neighborhood schools with locally-controlled funding; improve classrooms/instructional technology for college/career readiness; fix leaky roofs, crumbling ceilings and aging, deteriorating electrical, plumbing, fire safety and security systems; repair, construct, and acquire classrooms, labs, facilities, sites, equipment; shall Culver City Unified School District's measure authorizing $358,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, raising $22,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent, public oversight/audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7303, "no_votes": 4485, "total_votes": 11788, "percent_yes": 61.95283338988802, "percent_no": 38.04716661011198, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Culver City Unified School District to issue $358...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Culver City Unified School District to issue $358 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including classroom upgrades, technology, infrastructure repairs, and construction of new facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed property value, generating approximately $22 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.091545", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.495049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.023818", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1566, "fingerprint": "2024|202400039|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400039|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a9469ae13773538d", "measure_id": "202400039", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance ensuring local firefighter/paramedic emergency response, involving wildfires, house fires, heart attacks, strokes, and car accidents; to hire/train firefighters/paramedics, upgrade/replace aging firefighter safety equipment, fire engines, helicopters, facilities, life-saving rescue tools, and 911 communications technology; by levying 6 cents per square foot of certain parcel improvements, providing $152 million annually, limited to 2% annual adjustment, until ended by voters, exempting low-income seniors, with independent citizens oversight, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 704826, "no_votes": 575444, "total_votes": 1280270, "percent_yes": 55.05291852499863, "percent_no": 44.94708147500137, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies a 6-cent per square foot tax on certain property improvem...", "summary_text": "This measure levies a 6-cent per square foot tax on certain property improvements to fund fire department and emergency medical services, including hiring personnel and upgrading equipment, facilities, and technology. The tax would generate approximately $152 million annually with a 2% annual adjustment cap and includes exemptions for low-income seniors and independent oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.325132", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.940936", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1647, "fingerprint": "2024|202400583|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400583|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7a23175c891ac85c", "measure_id": "202400583", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure EE", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Pasadena Unified School District\u2019s measure to expand programs for Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Math (STEAM); enhance career training and college readiness courses; provide competitive wages for teachers and staff and hire counselors and mental health professionals be adopted, levying $90 per parcel for eight years (raising $5 million annually) with senior citizen exemptions, annual audits, and full disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65132, "no_votes": 28761, "total_votes": 93893, "percent_yes": 69.36832351719511, "percent_no": 30.63167648280489, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Pasadena Unified School District to levy a $90 annual...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Pasadena Unified School District to levy a $90 annual parcel tax for eight years to fund STEAM programs, career training, college readiness courses, teacher and staff wages, and hiring of counselors and mental health professionals. The tax includes exemptions for senior citizens and requires annual audits and spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.504469", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.028080", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure EE", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1587, "fingerprint": "2024|202400209|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400209|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0b74ddc47719d071", "measure_id": "202400209", "measure_letter": "EM", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure EM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve funding for various City services and goals like fire protection; graffiti removal; street and sidewalk repair; park maintenance and enhancements; youth and senior programs; building rainy day reserves and any other general governmental purpose, shall the City's 1 /2% transactions and use tax be increased to 3/4% and extended indefinitely until ended by voters to raise an additional $3,500,000 annually?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11885, "no_votes": 9633, "total_votes": 21518, "percent_yes": 55.23282832977042, "percent_no": 44.76717167022958, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases Los Angeles's sales tax from 0", "summary_text": "The measure increases Los Angeles's sales tax from 0.5% to 0.75% and extends it indefinitely, generating an additional $3.5 million annually for general city services including fire protection, infrastructure maintenance, parks, and youth and senior programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.381814", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.968132", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure EM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1596, "fingerprint": "2024|202400218|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400218|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "64aa934a57a6cbb3", "measure_id": "202400218", "measure_letter": "ER", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure ER", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to establish a minimum annual budget for the City Ethics Commission; increase the Commission's authority over spending decisions and hiring matters; allow the Commission to obtain outside counsel in limited circumstances; impose additional qualification requirements on Commission members; require the City Council to hold a public hearing on Commission proposals; and increase penalties for violations of City laws?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 874383, "no_votes": 285155, "total_votes": 1159538, "percent_yes": 75.40787796518958, "percent_no": 24.592122034810416, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Budget Processes", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment establishes a minimum annual budget for the Los Angele...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment establishes a minimum annual budget for the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission, expands its authority over spending and hiring decisions, allows it to obtain outside counsel in limited circumstances, adds qualification requirements for commissioners, requires City Council public hearings on Commission proposals, and increases penalties for violations of city laws.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.384580", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.969547", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure ER", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1619, "fingerprint": "2024|202400243|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400243|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "60996c9e5b7637c7", "measure_id": "202400243", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund essential city services such as 911 emergency response, public safety, and addressing homelessness, shall the measure modernizing the City of Santa Monica\u2019s 1990 business license tax ordinance to improve tax equity and fairness, exempting small businesses from the tax, decreasing tax rates for most retailers and restaurants, raising the corporate headquarters rate to 0.25%, removing auto dealer tax exemptions, and restoring a business license processing fee, generating approximately $3,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35971, "no_votes": 9962, "total_votes": 45933, "percent_yes": 78.31188905579867, "percent_no": 21.688110944201327, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure modernizes Santa Monica's business license tax by exempting smal...", "summary_text": "This measure modernizes Santa Monica's business license tax by exempting small businesses, decreasing rates for most retailers and restaurants, raising the corporate headquarters rate to 0.25%, removing auto dealer exemptions, and restoring a processing fee. The changes are projected to generate approximately $3 million annually to fund city services including emergency response, public safety, and homelessness programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.398167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.973445", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1597, "fingerprint": "2024|202400219|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400219|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1474e2a2c80138ec", "measure_id": "202400219", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure FF", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: allow peace officers employed by the Police, Airport, Harbor, and Recreation and Parks Departments to transfer membership and service from the Los Angeles City Employees\u2019 Retirement System to the Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension Plan; and require the City to pay associated costs, including refunds to certain Airport and Police Department members for prior transfers?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 686394, "no_votes": 489615, "total_votes": 1176009, "percent_yes": 58.36639005313735, "percent_no": 41.63360994686265, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the Los Angeles City Charter to allow peace officers from...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the Los Angeles City Charter to allow peace officers from the Police, Airport, Harbor, and Recreation and Parks Departments to transfer their membership and service credits from the city employees' retirement system to the fire and police pension plan. The city would be required to cover the costs of these transfers, including refunding certain Airport and Police Department members for previous transfers.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.384859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.969697", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure FF", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1614, "fingerprint": "2024|202400238|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400238|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ee75cbfd0ea4f57c", "measure_id": "202400238", "measure_letter": "FP", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure FP", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To recruit/retain qualified firefighters/paramedics/police, improve Redondo Beach\u2019s ability to provide fire/police protection and 911 response, help keep Redondo Beach safe by repairing/replacing/upgrading deteriorated fire/police stations/facilities, including removing asbestos and mold, shall Redondo Beach\u2019s measure authorizing $93,350,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying on average $17.45 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $ 6,280,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring oversight, spending disclosure, and all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25589, "no_votes": 10243, "total_votes": 35832, "percent_yes": 71.4138200491181, "percent_no": 28.5861799508819, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes $93,350,000 in bonds to repair, replace, and upgrade ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes $93,350,000 in bonds to repair, replace, and upgrade Redondo Beach's fire and police stations and facilities, including asbestos and mold removal. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $17.45 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $6,280,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.396361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.972656", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure FP", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10982, "fingerprint": "2024|202400556|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400556|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f279380e98cd9629", "measure_id": "202400556", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade Garvey schools, repair leaky roofs, modernize aging classrooms/bathrooms/playgrounds/outdoor spaces, improve access to modern technology, replace deteriorating plumbing/water/sewer systems, update electrical/lighting systems, provide heating/air-conditioning, make health, safety, security improvements, shall Garvey School District's measure be adopted authorizing $60,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value generating $3,500,000 annually for bonds through maturity, with annual audits and citizens' oversight, and no money for salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2336, "no_votes": 1447, "total_votes": 3783, "percent_yes": 61.74993391488237, "percent_no": 38.25006608511763, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Garvey School District to issue $60 million in bo...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Garvey School District to issue $60 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom and bathroom modernization, technology upgrades, plumbing and electrical system replacements, and health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating about $3.5 million annually until maturity.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.091732", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.495347", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.023979", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1567, "fingerprint": "2024|202400040|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400040|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c84c82dd7abdbbd8", "measure_id": "202400040", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the Los Angeles County Charter to create an elected County Executive; create an independent Ethics Commission to increase restrictions on lobbying and investigate misconduct; establish a nonpartisan Legislative Analyst to review proposed County policies; increase the Board of Supervisors from five to nine elected members; require County departments to present annual budgets in public meetings; using existing funding sources with no additional taxes to implement, as detailed in the charter amendment ordinance, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1665735, "no_votes": 1561068, "total_votes": 3226803, "percent_yes": 51.62183746575171, "percent_no": 48.37816253424829, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the Los Angeles County Charter to create an elected Count...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the Los Angeles County Charter to create an elected County Executive position, establish an independent Ethics Commission, add a nonpartisan Legislative Analyst, expand the Board of Supervisors from five to nine members, and require public budget presentations by county departments.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.325425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.941087", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1633, "fingerprint": "2024|202400567|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400567|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a0d155377f80af81", "measure_id": "202400567", "measure_letter": "GCC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure GCC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain affordable higher education; prepare students for four- year college/ university transfer; repair deteriorating gas/ sewer lines, roofs; provide safe drinking water; improve access for students with disabilities; remove asbestos, mold, lead; upgrade nursing/ career training classrooms, shall Glendale Community College District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $600,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25 per $100,000 assessed valuation ($29,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent oversight, public spending disclosure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53373, "no_votes": 23787, "total_votes": 77160, "percent_yes": 69.17185069984448, "percent_no": 30.828149300155516, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Glendale Community College District to issue $600...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Glendale Community College District to issue $600 million in bonds to fund campus improvements including infrastructure repairs, safety upgrades, accessibility improvements, and classroom modernization. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.498599", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.025629", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure GCC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1589, "fingerprint": "2024|202400211|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400211|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8976c14f0137421d", "measure_id": "202400211", "measure_letter": "HB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure HB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure protecting essential services such as police, crime prevention, parks, streets and sidewalks, beaches, cleaning of public areas, addressing homelessness, schools, supporting local businesses, and for other general governmental use by enacting a 3/4\u00a2 transaction and use (sales) tax providing approximately $3,000,000 annually, with a sunset clause 20 years from the effective date, or until ended by voters, with annual audits, a citizen oversight committee and all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4488, "no_votes": 6041, "total_votes": 10529, "percent_yes": 42.62513059169912, "percent_no": 57.37486940830088, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have enacted a 0.75-cent sales tax in Los Angeles to generate approximately $3 million annually for general city services including police, parks, street maintenance, homelessness programs, and schools. The tax would have included a 20-year sunset clause, annual audits, and citizen oversight, with all revenue staying within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.382419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.968441", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure HB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1592, "fingerprint": "2024|202400214|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400214|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bca64254f867cd55", "measure_id": "202400214", "measure_letter": "HC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure HC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the Charter to reduce Harbor and Public Utilities Commissioner terms to four years, transfer authority over Harbor Department employment and personnel matters from the Board of Harbor Commissioners to the Department\u2019s Chief Executive Officer, excepting a Board- appointed Chief Operating Officer, Executive Officer to the Board, and Board staff, and increasing penalties for violations of Harbor Department rules from $500 to $1000, and changing the Harbor budget approval date, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 85578, "no_votes": 63833, "total_votes": 149411, "percent_yes": 57.27690732275401, "percent_no": 42.72309267724599, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reduces Harbor and Public Utilities Commissioner terms from thei...", "summary_text": "This measure reduces Harbor and Public Utilities Commissioner terms from their current length to four years and transfers most Harbor Department employment and personnel authority from the Board of Harbor Commissioners to the department's Chief Executive Officer, with exceptions for certain board-appointed positions. It also doubles penalties for Harbor Department rule violations from $500 to $1,000 and changes the Harbor budget approval date.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.383372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.968916", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure HC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1598, "fingerprint": "2024|202400220|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400220|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7153e6646f884b8f", "measure_id": "202400220", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure HH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: require that commission appointees file financial disclosures before they can be confirmed; clarify the Controller\u2019s auditing authority regarding City contractors; expand the City Attorney\u2019s subpoena power; authorize temporary appointments to certain general manager positions; establish a process to evaluate the impacts of laws proposed by initiative petition; and make other changes and clarifications regarding City governance, appointments, and elections?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 954148, "no_votes": 219437, "total_votes": 1173585, "percent_yes": 81.30199346446997, "percent_no": 18.698006535530027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires financial disclosures from commission appoint...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires financial disclosures from commission appointees before confirmation, clarifies the Controller's auditing authority over City contractors, expands the City Attorney's subpoena power, allows temporary appointments to general manager positions, and establishes a process to evaluate impacts of citizen-initiated ballot measures. It also makes additional changes to City governance, appointments, and election procedures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.385174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.969858", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure HH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1573, "fingerprint": "2024|202400193|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400193|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e5d8484fb66b0dee", "measure_id": "202400193", "measure_letter": "HL", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure HL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance providing that when the City of Los Angeles makes a qualifying improvement to a City-owned street (e.g., a paving project), the City must also install certain street enhancements described in the City's Mobility Plan network of pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and vehicle routes; and requiring the City to provide publicly accessible information regarding street improvements; be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 362706, "no_votes": 191020, "total_votes": 553726, "percent_yes": 65.50279380054394, "percent_no": 34.49720619945606, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance requires the City of Los Angeles to install pedestrian, bicycl...", "summary_text": "This ordinance requires the City of Los Angeles to install pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and vehicle enhancements specified in the City's Mobility Plan whenever it makes qualifying improvements to city-owned streets, such as paving projects. It also mandates that the city provide publicly accessible information about street improvements.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.377162", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.965587", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure HL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1634, "fingerprint": "2024|202400569|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400569|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cc59439ddd4aeb55", "measure_id": "202400569", "measure_letter": "HV", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure HV", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; construct new science labs; make safety, security, and ADA improvements; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and renovate/modernize outdated classrooms and restrooms; shall Hermosa Beach City School District\u2019s measure be adopted, authorizing $28,700,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying on average $13.15 per $100,000 assessed valuation (projecting no increase in current tax rates, raising $2,608,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6507, "no_votes": 3972, "total_votes": 10479, "percent_yes": 62.095619811050675, "percent_no": 37.904380188949325, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Hermosa Beach City School District to issue $28", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Hermosa Beach City School District to issue $28.7 million in bonds to construct new science labs, make safety and ADA improvements, upgrade electrical systems, and renovate classrooms and restrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $13.15 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.499174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.025941", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure HV", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10978, "fingerprint": "2024|202400202|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400202|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "257c972f3625bc30", "measure_id": "202400202", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted to amend the Artesia General Plan 2030, the Artesia Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan, and the Artesia Municipal Code to require \"major modifications\" to the Artesia Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan to be approved by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2267, "no_votes": 2857, "total_votes": 5124, "percent_yes": 44.24277907884465, "percent_no": 55.75722092115535, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.082380", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.379742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.967041", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1568, "fingerprint": "2024|202400187|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400187|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d27d7eaf0fbc717a", "measure_id": "202400187", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, entitled City of Bell Transactions and Use Tax Measure, establishing a three-quarter cent per dollar (0.75%) general sales tax, annually providing an estimated $1.5 million in revenue, until ended by voters, with funds being deposited into the City of Bell General Fund for Public Safety (Police and Fire); Youth and Seniors Recreation Programs and Services; and for general government use, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1289, "no_votes": 1458, "total_votes": 2747, "percent_yes": 46.923917000364035, "percent_no": 53.076082999635965, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 0.75% general sales tax in the City of Bell, generating an estimated $1.5 million annually for the general fund to support public safety, youth and senior recreation programs, and general government operations. The tax would have remained in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.375286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.964683", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1599, "fingerprint": "2024|202400221|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400221|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "18ba38ec4e3f6b23", "measure_id": "202400221", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure II", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: clarify that the El Pueblo Monument and the Zoo are park property; clarify that departments may sell merchandise to support City operations; include gender identity in non-discrimination rules applicable to employment by the City; clarify the Airport Commission\u2019s authority to establish fees and regulations; and make other changes and clarifications related to City administration and operations?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 849085, "no_votes": 316273, "total_votes": 1165358, "percent_yes": 72.86044288536226, "percent_no": 27.13955711463774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment clarifies that the El Pueblo Monument and Zoo are city...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment clarifies that the El Pueblo Monument and Zoo are city park property, allows departments to sell merchandise to support operations, adds gender identity to employment non-discrimination rules, and clarifies the Airport Commission's fee and regulatory authority. It also makes additional administrative changes and clarifications to city operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.385484", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.970016", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure II", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1590, "fingerprint": "2024|202400212|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400212|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "626e04c9a9e5fecd", "measure_id": "202400212", "measure_letter": "IR", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure IR", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to maintain locally-generated funding for police, emergency/ disaster response, senior citizens/ parks/ transportation/ recreation/ library/ aquatics, and economic/ job development; fix potholes/ streets; clean up encampments/ address homelessness; and other general City services; authorizing a \u00bc% Supplemental Transactions and Use Tax, taking effect when legally permissible, generating approximately $1,000,000 annually until ended by voters; and funds only for Irwindale, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 459, "no_votes": 217, "total_votes": 676, "percent_yes": 67.89940828402366, "percent_no": 32.100591715976336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes a 0.25% supplemental sales tax in Irwindale to fund local services including police, emergency response, parks, libraries, street repairs, homelessness programs, and economic development, generating approximately $1 million annually until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.382731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.968599", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure IR", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1655, "fingerprint": "2024|202400593|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400593|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "50c821d6b3361f1d", "measure_id": "202400593", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of local schools, repair or replace leaky roofs; improve school safety and security; replace outdated plumbing, electrical, and sewer systems; renovate, upgrade, and construct science labs, classrooms, and restrooms; shall Snowline Joint Unified School District's measure authorizing $70,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, levying an average 4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, generating approximately $3,900,000 annually, with annual audits, independent oversight, NO funds for salaries, all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52, "no_votes": 41, "total_votes": 93, "percent_yes": 55.91397849462365, "percent_no": 44.08602150537635, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Snowline Joint Unified School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Snowline Joint Unified School District to issue $70,600,000 in bonds to fund school facility improvements including roof repairs, safety upgrades, infrastructure replacements, and construction of science labs, classrooms, and restrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging 4 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $3,900,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.507466", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.029637", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1593, "fingerprint": "2024|202400215|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400215|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ffc5a3e3c3d0d81f", "measure_id": "202400215", "measure_letter": "JB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure JB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the City\u2019s Charter to combine the Civil Service and Human Resources Departments into one unified department to manage all employee recruitment, hiring, and certifications; and establish an independent Civil Service Employee Rights and Appeals Commission to resolve complaints regarding Civil Service rules, to adjudicate classified employee disciplinary appeals; and to implement classified hiring preferences for Long Beach residents, students from local colleges and universities, current employees, and certain internships/apprenticeships, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95813, "no_votes": 58911, "total_votes": 154724, "percent_yes": 61.92510534887929, "percent_no": 38.07489465112071, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure combines Los Angeles's Civil Service and Human Resources Departm...", "summary_text": "This measure combines Los Angeles's Civil Service and Human Resources Departments into one unified department responsible for employee recruitment, hiring, and certifications, while creating an independent Civil Service Employee Rights and Appeals Commission to handle complaints and disciplinary appeals. It also establishes hiring preferences for Long Beach residents, local students, current employees, and participants in certain internships and apprenticeships.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.383686", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.969077", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure JB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10983, "fingerprint": "2024|202400558|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400558|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "19c2a0a098bd4d54", "measure_id": "202400558", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; make health, safety and security improvements; repair/ replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace deteriorating plumbing/ sewer systems and heating and air-conditioning systems; shall South Whittier School District's measure be adopted authorizing $37,500,000 of bonds with legal rates, raising on average $2,200,000 per year until repaid, at approximately $30.00 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent oversight, no money for salaries, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1446, "no_votes": 1028, "total_votes": 2474, "percent_yes": 58.44785772029103, "percent_no": 41.55214227970897, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the South Whittier School District to issue $37", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the South Whittier School District to issue $37.5 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom and restroom modernization, and upgrades to plumbing and HVAC systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising an average of $2.2 million annually until repaid.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.092109", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.495917", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.024279", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1620, "fingerprint": "2024|202400244|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400244|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "71cadf9b7b107c92", "measure_id": "202400244", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To enhance public safety, create safe routes to school to protect children, lower the risk of fatal traffic accidents, and maintain other essential city services, shall the measure increasing the City of Santa Monica Parking Facility Tax by 8% for users including visitors and tourists, causing no additional cost in City-owned lots and structures (including downtown and the beach) because of a partial City exemption, generating approximately $6,700,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34669, "no_votes": 12014, "total_votes": 46683, "percent_yes": 74.26472163314268, "percent_no": 25.735278366857315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases Santa Monica's Parking Facility Tax by 8% for users inc...", "summary_text": "The measure increases Santa Monica's Parking Facility Tax by 8% for users including visitors and tourists, generating approximately $6.7 million annually for public safety, safe school routes, traffic accident reduction, and other city services. City-owned lots and structures receive a partial exemption so users pay no additional cost in those facilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.398482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.973608", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1632, "fingerprint": "2024|202400566|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400566|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fabfd28d03844394", "measure_id": "202400566", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms, labs, career technology and facilities at high schools serving Fullerton, Buena Park, and La Habra to support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, and skilled trades and fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewer, and electrical systems, shall Fullerton Joint Union High School District's measure authorizing $284,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $21 per $100,000 assessed value ($18,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4601, "no_votes": 4701, "total_votes": 9302, "percent_yes": 49.462481186841536, "percent_no": 50.537518813158464, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Fullerton Joint Union High School Distr...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Fullerton Joint Union High School District to issue $284 million in bonds to repair and upgrade facilities at high schools serving Fullerton, Buena Park, and La Habra, including classrooms, labs, and infrastructure systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of $21 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.498321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.025480", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1594, "fingerprint": "2024|202400216|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400216|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "98c1b4cf5fef6a78", "measure_id": "202400216", "measure_letter": "LB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to maintain general city services, including 911 response; firefighter/paramedic; pothole/street repairs; improve storm drains; afterschool programs; senior services; parks; libraries; public health; and homeless services, by eliminating the exemption for electrical corporations/government agencies using gas to make electricity and applying Long Beach\u2019s existing 5% gas utility user tax to said corporations/agencies, generating approximately $15,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, spending disclosure, and all funds used locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 133093, "no_votes": 29854, "total_votes": 162947, "percent_yes": 81.67870534591002, "percent_no": 18.321294654089982, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure eliminates the exemption for electrical corporations and governm...", "summary_text": "This measure eliminates the exemption for electrical corporations and government agencies from Long Beach's existing 5% gas utility user tax when they use gas to generate electricity, generating approximately $15 million annually for general city services. The funds would support services including emergency response, infrastructure repairs, parks, libraries, and social programs, with requirements for audits and spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.383976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.969239", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1571, "fingerprint": "2024|202400191|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400191|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "30c348e11b035bfc", "measure_id": "202400191", "measure_letter": "LC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, funding City of La Ca\u00f1ada Flintridge services such as increasing neighborhood Sheriff patrols; preparing for and responding to wildfires/natural disasters; repaving and repairing streets/potholes; keeping public spaces safe and clean; maintaining parks and community programs for youth and seniors; and for general government use by establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $2,625,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits and line item budget disclosures, with all funds used locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3955, "no_votes": 2747, "total_votes": 6702, "percent_yes": 59.01223515368547, "percent_no": 40.98776484631453, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.75% sales tax in La Ca\u00f1ada Flintridge to fund city services including sheriff patrols, wildfire preparation, street repairs, park maintenance, and youth and senior programs, generating approximately $2.6 million annually. The tax continues until ended by voters and requires audits and budget disclosures with all funds used locally.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.376511", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.965280", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1604, "fingerprint": "2024|202400228|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400228|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "97d752a3da5b84f5", "measure_id": "202400228", "measure_letter": "LG", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LG", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance providing funding for City of Monterey Park\u2019s general services such as maintaining 911 emergency response and fire protection; increasing neighborhood police patrols; maintaining parks; supporting youth, afterschool, and senior programs; repairing streets and potholes; by increasing the City of Monterey Park\u2019s transient occupancy tax, paid only by hotel/motel and short-term rental guests, from 12% to 13%, providing approximately $500,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring spending disclosure, funds locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13147, "no_votes": 4109, "total_votes": 17256, "percent_yes": 76.18799258229022, "percent_no": 23.81200741770978, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases Monterey Park's transient occupancy tax from 12% to 13%...", "summary_text": "The measure increases Monterey Park's transient occupancy tax from 12% to 13% on hotel, motel, and short-term rental guests to fund general city services including emergency response, police patrols, parks, youth and senior programs, and street repairs. It is expected to generate approximately $500,000 annually with required spending disclosure and local fund control.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.387641", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.971092", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LG", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1600, "fingerprint": "2024|202400222|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400222|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7f77e45e118af921", "measure_id": "202400222", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to establish an independent redistricting commission to redraw Board of Education district lines every ten years in the Los Angeles Unified School District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1031836, "no_votes": 330222, "total_votes": 1362058, "percent_yes": 75.7556579822592, "percent_no": 24.244342017740806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes an independent redistricting commission to redraw Los...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes an independent redistricting commission to redraw Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education boundaries every ten years. This process would replace the current system where the school board redraws its own district lines.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.385756", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.970177", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1637, "fingerprint": "2024|202400572|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400572|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f807bccf9cc98e6b", "measure_id": "202400572", "measure_letter": "LP", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LP", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ improve classrooms/ facilities; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical infrastructure; remove asbestos, lead, other hazardous materials; paint facilities; improve student safety/ security; construct gymnasiums/ aquatic facilities; install solar panels; and support college/ career readiness in science, technology, engineering, math, skilled trades, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2016-1 of the Local Public Schools Funding Authority issue $89,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, at $16.20 per $100,000 assessed value ($6,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with mandatory audits and independent citizens oversight, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28469, "no_votes": 8611, "total_votes": 37080, "percent_yes": 76.777238403452, "percent_no": 23.222761596547997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the issuance of $89 million in bonds to repair and im...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the issuance of $89 million in bonds to repair and improve school facilities, including fixing infrastructure, removing hazardous materials, constructing new facilities, and supporting STEM and career readiness programs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $16.20 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.500111", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.026402", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LP", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1606, "fingerprint": "2024|202400230|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400230|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1fff4dc62b266033", "measure_id": "202400230", "measure_letter": "LR", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LR", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure with no tax increase on residents and providing funding for general services such as public safety, 911 emergency response, gang prevention, street repairs, keeping public areas/parks safe, by updating Paramount's existing Business License Tax to apply to gross receipts (rates benefitting small businesses set forth in the measure) generating approximately $350,000 (three hundred fifty thousand dollars) annually until ended by voters, requiring spending disclosure, funds used locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9529, "no_votes": 2835, "total_votes": 12364, "percent_yes": 77.07052733743124, "percent_no": 22.929472662568756, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure updates Paramount's existing business license tax to apply to gr...", "summary_text": "This measure updates Paramount's existing business license tax to apply to gross receipts rather than the current structure, with rates designed to benefit small businesses, generating approximately $350,000 annually for general city services. The measure includes requirements for spending disclosure and specifies that funds must be used locally, with the tax continuing until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.388270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.971412", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LR", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1635, "fingerprint": "2024|202400570|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400570|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "44d9db9d62c7b9ec", "measure_id": "202400570", "measure_letter": "LS", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To retain teachers, provide safe, modern elementary and middle schools by fixing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, and infrastructure, and upgrading classrooms, science labs, and school facilities for student achievement in math, science, technology, arts, and engineering, shall Lancaster School District's measure be adopted authorizing $122,100,000 in bonds at legal rates without increasing current tax rates, $30 per $100,000 assessed value, raising $8,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24308, "no_votes": 12162, "total_votes": 36470, "percent_yes": 66.65204277488347, "percent_no": 33.34795722511653, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Lancaster School District to issue $122,100,000 i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Lancaster School District to issue $122,100,000 in bonds to repair and upgrade elementary and middle school facilities, including infrastructure, classrooms, and science labs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $8,300,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.499471", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.026103", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1651, "fingerprint": "2024|202400589|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400589|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fbb68b94e18ce53d", "measure_id": "202400589", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain/ repair local schools with no tax rate increase, including leaky roofs; restrooms, heating/ cooling, security, fire safety, electrical systems; ensure safe drinking water; update technology/ classrooms/ labs that support college/ career readiness, shall San Marino Unified School District's measure authorizing $200,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $60 per $100,000 of assessed value ($11,900,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with independent oversight, annual audits, all funds for San Marino Schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5213, "no_votes": 2048, "total_votes": 7261, "percent_yes": 71.79451866134141, "percent_no": 28.205481338658586, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes San Marino Unified School District to issue $200 milli...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes San Marino Unified School District to issue $200 million in bonds to fund school maintenance, repairs, and upgrades including roofs, restrooms, safety systems, technology, and classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.506272", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.029008", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1627, "fingerprint": "2024|202400557|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400557|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0d7cd64eae2a80cf", "measure_id": "202400557", "measure_letter": "MB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure MB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain quality education without increasing taxes, keep Manhattan Beach schools among California's best; protect quality math, science, technology, reading and writing programs; attract/ retain high quality teachers; and prepare students for college/ careers, shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District's measure be adopted renewing the expiring $225 education parcel tax at the current rate for 6 years, providing $2,500,000 annually, with senior exemptions, requiring public disclosure of spending, independent oversight and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8459, "no_votes": 4028, "total_votes": 12487, "percent_yes": 67.74245215023625, "percent_no": 32.25754784976375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews Manhattan Beach Unified School District's existing $225 a...", "summary_text": "This measure renews Manhattan Beach Unified School District's existing $225 annual parcel tax for six years, generating $2.5 million annually for educational programs and teacher retention. The measure includes senior exemptions, spending oversight requirements, and keeps all funds within the local district.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.495643", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.024129", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure MB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1602, "fingerprint": "2024|202400224|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400224|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "59e80f31ad8d64b5", "measure_id": "202400224", "measure_letter": "MC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure MC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3170, "no_votes": 1585, "total_votes": 4755, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changes the Los Angeles City Clerk position from an elected offi...", "summary_text": "This measure changes the Los Angeles City Clerk position from an elected office to one appointed by the city government. The measure passed, meaning the City Clerk will now be appointed rather than elected by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.386359", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.970485", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure MC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1631, "fingerprint": "2024|202400565|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400565|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "21177301d7032fce", "measure_id": "202400565", "measure_letter": "ME", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure ME", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade neighborhood elementary schools by modernizing classrooms, expanding outdoor learning and green spaces, improving performing arts facilities, repairing school structures, and enhancing school safety, shall El Monte City School District's measure authorizing $105,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, with an estimated average levy of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value (averaging $6,752,207 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with all funds managed locally with citizen oversight, audits, and public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12053, "no_votes": 6869, "total_votes": 18922, "percent_yes": 63.6983405559666, "percent_no": 36.3016594440334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the El Monte City School District to issue $105 millio...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the El Monte City School District to issue $105 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, expand outdoor learning spaces, improve performing arts facilities, repair school structures, and enhance safety at elementary schools. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes with an estimated average levy of $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.498026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.025327", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure ME", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1652, "fingerprint": "2024|202400590|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400590|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0a61a1fc362cd9e6", "measure_id": "202400590", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure MM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To remove asbestos/lead/hazardous materials where needed; fix leaky roofs, plumbing, inadequate wiring, safety/security systems; upgrade classrooms, labs, libraries, instructional technology for competitive college and careers; shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (Malibu Schools) of Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $395,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, levying 4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (raising $22 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and all funds for Malibu public schools only?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4663, "no_votes": 2828, "total_votes": 7491, "percent_yes": 62.248030970497936, "percent_no": 37.751969029502064, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes $395 million in bonds for the Santa Monica-Malibu Uni...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes $395 million in bonds for the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District to fund facility improvements at Malibu public schools, including removing hazardous materials, fixing infrastructure problems, and upgrading classrooms and technology. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 4 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising approximately $22 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.506555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.029157", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure MM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1601, "fingerprint": "2024|202400223|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400223|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "643467382e251352", "measure_id": "202400223", "measure_letter": "MMB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure MMB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding for general city services in Manhattan Beach, including keeping local streets, sidewalks, infrastructure, and parks safe, clean, and well-maintained; repairing/upgrading aging community facilities; fixing potholes; and improving parking availability and traffic safety, shall City of Manhattan Beach's ordinance establishing a 0.5\u00a2 sales tax be adopted, providing $5,000,000 annually until ended by voters for general government use that can't be taken by the State, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11511, "no_votes": 8542, "total_votes": 20053, "percent_yes": 57.40288236174138, "percent_no": 42.59711763825862, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.5-cent sales tax in Manhattan Beach to generate approximately $5 million annually for general city services including street maintenance, infrastructure repairs, park upkeep, and community facility upgrades. The tax includes provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits, with funds remaining under local control and continuing until terminated by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.386062", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.970325", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure MMB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1654, "fingerprint": "2024|202400592|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400592|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e1c1bf6c37c002a0", "measure_id": "202400592", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To retrofit classrooms/ schools, improve preparedness for earthquakes, wildfires, natural disasters; upgrade secured school entries and safety systems; expand early childhood education classrooms; and construct/ repair sites and facilities; shall Saugus Union School District's (SFID 2014-1) measure be adopted, authorizing $187 million in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating $13 million annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, oversight, and all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27397, "no_votes": 28746, "total_votes": 56143, "percent_yes": 48.79860356589423, "percent_no": 51.20139643410577, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Saugus Union School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Saugus Union School District to issue $187 million in bonds to retrofit classrooms for earthquake and wildfire preparedness, upgrade safety systems, expand early childhood education facilities, and construct or repair school sites. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $13 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.507187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.029487", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1630, "fingerprint": "2024|202400563|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400563|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ae1eec497c71948e", "measure_id": "202400563", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renew expiring local school funding without increasing current tax rates; retain and attract qualified teachers; sustain high-quality math, science, engineering, technology, arts, and music instruction; prepare students for college and careers; maintain small class sizes; and support students with disabilities, shall Culver City Unified School District's measure be adopted continuing its existing $189 education parcel tax, exempting senior citizens, with independent oversight, raising approximately $2,400,000 annually for eight years, that cannot be taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17146, "no_votes": 3402, "total_votes": 20548, "percent_yes": 83.44364415028227, "percent_no": 16.556355849717733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews Culver City Unified School District's existing $189 annua...", "summary_text": "This measure renews Culver City Unified School District's existing $189 annual parcel tax for eight more years without increasing the current rate, generating approximately $2.4 million annually for school programs and operations. The tax includes exemptions for senior citizens and prohibits the state from taking the locally-raised funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.497390", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.025029", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10988, "fingerprint": "2024|202400577|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400577|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e7e9392b3afdc2e3", "measure_id": "202400577", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide safe, modern elementary/intermediate schools; construct, repair/update classrooms, science labs/school facilities to support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, arts/engineering; improve disabled student access; replace deteriorating portables with permanent classrooms; shall Lowell Joint School District's measure authorizing $54,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $4,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, annual audits, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4948, "no_votes": 4363, "total_votes": 9311, "percent_yes": 53.14144560197616, "percent_no": 46.85855439802384, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.095675", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.502274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.027165", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1577, "fingerprint": "2024|202400197|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400197|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "aa745e1ad949deed", "measure_id": "202400197", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain City services such as 911 emergency response, police, fire, crime prevention, youth/recreation, library, park and road maintenance, homelessness services, and other City programs, shall the measure keeping the current City Transactions and Use Tax at 0.75% beyond the March 31, 2029 sunset date and until ended by Pomona voters, providing an estimated $16.8 million annually for general government use, subject to public disclosure and oversight, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8850, "no_votes": 5878, "total_votes": 14728, "percent_yes": 60.08962520369364, "percent_no": 39.91037479630636, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would extend Pomona's existing 0", "summary_text": "This measure would extend Pomona's existing 0.75% sales tax beyond its March 31, 2029 expiration date, generating approximately $16.8 million annually for general city services including police, fire, emergency response, parks, libraries, and homelessness programs. The tax would continue indefinitely until voters decide to end it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.378292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.966274", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1607, "fingerprint": "2024|202400231|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400231|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fc3265c782a5fc66", "measure_id": "202400231", "measure_letter": "PA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall amendments to Pasadena City Charter, Article IV, to require special elections: 1) to fill Council District vacancies if two or more years remain on an unexpired term, or 2) if the City Council fails to appoint a replacement to fill an unexpired term of less than two years within 75 days of the vacancy being declared; to establish a 30-day City residency requirement for appointed office; and to make other administrative revisions, including those restricting changes to Campaign Contribution Limits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49877, "no_votes": 7841, "total_votes": 57718, "percent_yes": 86.41498319415088, "percent_no": 13.585016805849122, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires special elections to fill Pasadena City Counc...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires special elections to fill Pasadena City Council vacancies when more than two years remain on the term or when the Council fails to appoint a replacement within 75 days for shorter terms. It also establishes a 30-day city residency requirement for appointed officials and includes administrative changes such as restrictions on modifying campaign contribution limits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.389731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.971568", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1608, "fingerprint": "2024|202400232|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400232|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ef5626e210111619", "measure_id": "202400232", "measure_letter": "PB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall amendments to Pasadena City Charter, Article IV, requiring the Organizational Meeting of the City Council to occur annually in December, the Vice Mayor's election to occur annually at the Organizational Meeting for a term of one year; and creating an Acting Mayor position to serve in the Mayor's role in the event of a Mayoral vacancy, with the Acting Mayor to be chosen from among the remaining members of the City Council, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48524, "no_votes": 8163, "total_votes": 56687, "percent_yes": 85.59987298675182, "percent_no": 14.40012701324818, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment changes Pasadena's City Council organizational meeting...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment changes Pasadena's City Council organizational meeting from occurring at various times to annually in December, requires the Vice Mayor to be elected annually at this meeting for one-year terms, and creates an Acting Mayor position to be filled by a City Council member when the Mayor's office becomes vacant.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.391441", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.971732", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1609, "fingerprint": "2024|202400233|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400233|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0c1f0df0011d3a1c", "measure_id": "202400233", "measure_letter": "PC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall amendments to Pasadena City Charter, Article IV, to establish term limits of no more than three consecutive terms for the elected offices of Mayor and Councilmember, respectively, and allowing an additional two terms after at least a four-year hiatus from the elected office held, for a maximum of five total terms in the same office, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47398, "no_votes": 10432, "total_votes": 57830, "percent_yes": 81.96091993774857, "percent_no": 18.03908006225143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment establishes term limits for Pasadena's Mayor and City ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment establishes term limits for Pasadena's Mayor and City Council members, allowing no more than three consecutive terms followed by the possibility of serving two additional terms after at least a four-year break, for a maximum of five total terms in the same office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.392213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.971904", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1605, "fingerprint": "2024|202400229|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400229|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "359408a5fb9a7f2c", "measure_id": "202400229", "measure_letter": "PD", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PD", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance protecting Palmdale\u2019s financial stability; maintaining essential services; maintaining 911 response; retaining businesses; maintaining veterans, senior, mental health, and homelessness community programs; by amending the city\u2019s sales and use tax ordinance to provide automatic increase to the sales and use tax rate, to the maximum permitted, \u2013 whether because another tax expires, the Legislature increases the statutory maximum use tax for the City, or otherwise \u2013 be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27151, "no_votes": 22225, "total_votes": 49376, "percent_yes": 54.98825340246274, "percent_no": 45.01174659753726, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows Palmdale to automatically increase its sales and use tax ...", "summary_text": "This measure allows Palmdale to automatically increase its sales and use tax rate to the maximum permitted level whenever legal limits increase or other taxes expire, without requiring additional voter approval. The revenue would fund general city services including emergency response, community programs, and business retention efforts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.387999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.971253", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PD", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1610, "fingerprint": "2024|202400234|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400234|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "66ea95f16caa3a0d", "measure_id": "202400234", "measure_letter": "PF", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PF", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an amendment to Section 1502 of the Pasadena City Charter to ensure continued fire and police representation on the Pasadena Fire and Police Retirement System Board by allowing fire and police trustees to be selected pursuant to a policy approved by resolution of the Retirement Board, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48196, "no_votes": 8082, "total_votes": 56278, "percent_yes": 85.63914851274032, "percent_no": 14.36085148725968, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment allows fire and police trustees on the Pasadena Fire a...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment allows fire and police trustees on the Pasadena Fire and Police Retirement System Board to be selected through a policy approved by the Retirement Board itself, rather than through the previous selection method. The change is intended to maintain fire and police representation on the retirement system's governing board.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.392943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.972063", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PF", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1611, "fingerprint": "2024|202400235|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400235|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3e4200c246402fbd", "measure_id": "202400235", "measure_letter": "PL", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to earthquake retrofit the 97-year-old library building; meet current fire safety regulations; replace the leaky roof; remove asbestos/mold/lead paint; update outdated technology; restore Pasadena Central Library services by the City of Pasadena issuing $195,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $28.90 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating $12,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent audits, public spending disclosure, all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44835, "no_votes": 17074, "total_votes": 61909, "percent_yes": 72.42081119061848, "percent_no": 27.57918880938152, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of Pasadena to issue $195 million in bonds t...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of Pasadena to issue $195 million in bonds to earthquake retrofit, repair, and modernize the 97-year-old Pasadena Central Library, including addressing safety hazards, updating technology, and restoring services. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $28.90 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $12 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.393623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.972210", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1570, "fingerprint": "2024|202400190|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400190|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d4f6a4d3f79440f1", "measure_id": "202400190", "measure_letter": "PP", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PP", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide Huntington Park residents access to overnight parking, reduce 9-1-1 emergencies response times by preventing parking violations that block streets and make it difficult for ambulances, fire engines, police, paramedics, and other emergency personnel to navigate city streets; improve trash collection and street sweeping services, shall Huntington Park be directed to conduct a citywide study to develop, implement and enforce a parking permit program on public streets to improve residents quality of life?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2335, "no_votes": 1323, "total_votes": 3658, "percent_yes": 63.8326954620011, "percent_no": 36.1673045379989, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure directs Huntington Park to conduct a citywide study to develop, ...", "summary_text": "This measure directs Huntington Park to conduct a citywide study to develop, implement and enforce a parking permit program on public streets. The stated goals include providing overnight parking access for residents, reducing emergency response times by preventing parking violations that block streets, and improving trash collection and street sweeping services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.376234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.965130", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PP", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1612, "fingerprint": "2024|202400236|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400236|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2ab787d284273309", "measure_id": "202400236", "measure_letter": "PR", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PR", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall amendments to Pasadena City Charter, Article XVIII, that align senior and disabled definitions, and eviction rules with state law; exempt certain government-subsidized housing from rent control; adjust relocation assistance timelines for certain evictions; establish processes for Board Member removal due to misconduct and for voter- initiated petitions; clarify penalties for violations; update various dates and deadlines; and make other minor corrections, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35351, "no_votes": 19999, "total_votes": 55350, "percent_yes": 63.86811201445348, "percent_no": 36.13188798554652, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Housing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment aligns Pasadena's housing regulations with state law b...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment aligns Pasadena's housing regulations with state law by updating definitions for seniors and disabled residents, eviction rules, and rent control exemptions for certain government-subsidized housing, while also establishing processes for removing board members and making various administrative updates. The measure also adjusts relocation assistance timelines and clarifies penalties for violations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.394102", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.972359", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PR", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1622, "fingerprint": "2024|202400246|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400246|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2ef1a189d1e492c4", "measure_id": "202400246", "measure_letter": "PS", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall this measure to fund and maintain police, fire, and paramedic costs by imposing a public safety special tax from July 1, 2025, to July 1, 2032, to raise approximately $2,037,000 yearly, with annual audits and citizen oversight provided, at the following rates (subject to increases in CPI and certain exclusions): - Single-family residential parcels - $480 per parcel per year,-Multi-family residential parcels - $576 per parcel per year, and - Non-residential parcels - $660 per parcel per year; be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2984, "no_votes": 3666, "total_votes": 6650, "percent_yes": 44.87218045112782, "percent_no": 55.12781954887218, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed annual special taxes on property parcels from...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed annual special taxes on property parcels from 2025 to 2032 to fund police, fire, and paramedic services, with rates of $480 for single-family residential, $576 for multi-family residential, and $660 for non-residential parcels. The measure was designed to raise approximately $2,037,000 yearly and included provisions for annual audits, citizen oversight, and cost-of-living adjustments.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.399057", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.974214", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1621, "fingerprint": "2024|202400245|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400245|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d163fcd3ef8e0e33", "measure_id": "202400245", "measure_letter": "PSK", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PSK", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) If Measure K is enacted, should at least half of the additional revenue raised be used to protect public safety in Santa Monica, including attracting and retaining well- trained police officers and firefighters, improving crime and homelessness prevention services, and increasing police patrols and enhancing emergency medical response in neighborhoods and public areas, including downtown, the pier, and the beach?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30409, "no_votes": 14836, "total_votes": 45245, "percent_yes": 67.20963642391425, "percent_no": 32.79036357608575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asks whether at least half of additional revenue from M...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asks whether at least half of additional revenue from Measure K should be allocated to public safety services in Santa Monica, including police and fire department staffing, crime and homelessness prevention, and enhanced emergency response in key areas like downtown and the beach. The measure passed with 70% support, providing non-binding guidance on how to spend potential new revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.398756", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.973775", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PSK", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1646, "fingerprint": "2024|202400582|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400582|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "22a229c62927f83c", "measure_id": "202400582", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve school safety/ security systems; fix deteriorating infrastructure, roofs, plumbing, electrical; repair, construct and improve classrooms, labs and career-training facilities to support student achievement and college/ career readiness in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades, shall Paramount Unified School District's measure authorizing $190,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $10,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14681, "no_votes": 4998, "total_votes": 19679, "percent_yes": 74.60236800650439, "percent_no": 25.397631993495608, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Paramount Unified School District to issue $190 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Paramount Unified School District to issue $190 million in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including safety systems, building repairs, and construction of classrooms and career-training facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating approximately $10 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.504184", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.027930", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1586, "fingerprint": "2024|202400208|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400208|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "88f89e510afef711", "measure_id": "202400208", "measure_letter": "QQ", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure QQ", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure authorizing the City Council of the City of Duarte to adopt an ordinance to permit no more than two (2) storefront retail sales cannabis dispensaries and that taxes cannabis businesses up to 10% of gross receipts to raise up to approximately $2,526,250 annually until ended by voters be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4523, "no_votes": 4163, "total_votes": 8686, "percent_yes": 52.07230025328114, "percent_no": 47.92769974671886, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the City of Duarte to allow up to two storefront canna...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the City of Duarte to allow up to two storefront cannabis dispensaries and impose a tax of up to 10% on gross receipts from cannabis businesses. The tax is projected to generate approximately $2,526,250 annually until voters decide to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.381510", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.967985", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure QQ", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1653, "fingerprint": "2024|202400591|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400591|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "81cf3b84ed2a757f", "measure_id": "202400591", "measure_letter": "QS", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure QS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/replace leaky school roofs, outdated wiring/ plumbing; remove hazardous materials; upgrade classrooms, labs, instructional technology supporting science, math, engineering; improve education for struggling students; and increase student/ school safety; shall Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District\u2019s measure for School Facilities Improvement District No.1 (Santa Monica Schools) be adopted authorizing $495,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (raising $28 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and all funds for Santa Monica schools only?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28473, "no_votes": 16781, "total_votes": 45254, "percent_yes": 62.91819507667831, "percent_no": 37.08180492332169, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District to issue $495 million in bonds to fund school facility repairs and improvements, including roof repairs, infrastructure upgrades, classroom and lab improvements, and safety enhancements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising approximately $28 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.506882", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.029319", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure QS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10989, "fingerprint": "2024|202400584|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400584|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c1495d126a12697d", "measure_id": "202400584", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Pasadena Unified School District's measure to expand classrooms for Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Math; upgrade Career Education labs; replace leaky roofs; and repair deteriorating electrical, plumbing, heating, and air-conditioning systems be adopted, authorizing $900 million of bonds with audits, legal rates, average levies below $59 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding (raising $57 million annually), citizen oversight, state matching funds eligibility and public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60674, "no_votes": 32228, "total_votes": 92902, "percent_yes": 65.30968116940431, "percent_no": 34.690318830595686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Pasadena Unified School District to issue $900 mi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Pasadena Unified School District to issue $900 million in bonds to expand STEAM classrooms, upgrade career education labs, replace roofs, and repair building systems including electrical, plumbing, and HVAC. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging below $59 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.097011", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.504741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.028243", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1574, "fingerprint": "2024|202400194|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400194|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d7acb9dd8fa482a1", "measure_id": "202400194", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall amendments to the Pasadena City Charter to: 1) make clerical corrections relating to outdated language and citations contained in various sections of the City Charter; and 2) update the accounting method used to calculate the existing voter-approved transfer from the Power Fund to the General Fund, in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), for general government use such as 911 response, fire, paramedic, public health, street repairs, senior, and homeless services, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28568, "no_votes": 3673, "total_votes": 32241, "percent_yes": 88.60767345925996, "percent_no": 11.392326540740044, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment makes clerical corrections to outdated language and ci...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment makes clerical corrections to outdated language and citations in the Pasadena City Charter and updates the accounting method for calculating voter-approved transfers from the Power Fund to the General Fund to comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.377429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.965737", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10980, "fingerprint": "2024|202400226|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400226|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f3f8854f807cf619", "measure_id": "202400226", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure R1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Angie Jimenez be recalled (removed) from the office of the City of Montebello District 5 Councilmember?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2018, "no_votes": 1155, "total_votes": 3173, "percent_yes": 63.59911755436496, "percent_no": 36.40088244563504, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Angie Jimenez from her position a...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Angie Jimenez from her position as City of Montebello District 5 Councilmember. The measure passed, resulting in her removal from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.086851", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.387038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.970780", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure R1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1615, "fingerprint": "2024|202400239|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400239|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c1b4a3a7bb6c484d", "measure_id": "202400239", "measure_letter": "RB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure RB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure be adopted (1) amending the Redondo Beach City Charter sections relating to \u201c Major Changes in Allowable Land Use\u201d in conformity with a Superior Court ruling that the voter approval requirement of the City Charter shall not apply to an amendment to, or update of, the Housing Element of the City\u2019s General Plan, or the zoning changes contemplated by the Draft Housing Element; and (2) changing the requirement that sample ballot materials be \u201cmailed\u201d to \u201cmade available\u201d?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20733, "no_votes": 11968, "total_votes": 32701, "percent_yes": 63.40173083391946, "percent_no": 36.59826916608054, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment exempts Housing Element updates and related zoning cha...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment exempts Housing Element updates and related zoning changes from the city's voter approval requirement for major land use changes, following a Superior Court ruling. It also changes the requirement for sample ballot materials from being mailed to being made available to voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.396789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.972823", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure RB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1649, "fingerprint": "2024|202400587|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400587|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c786e5594fba9acc", "measure_id": "202400587", "measure_letter": "RH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure RH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prepare students for college transfer/careers by: upgrading classrooms/labs for nursing, police, fire, manufacturing; constructing education facilities; repairing leaky roofs; providing safe, clean drinking water; improving technology, electrical systems, high speed internet, student safety; shall Rio Hondo Community College District's measure be adopted to issue $442,200,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising approximately $28,262,000 annually through maturity, with audits, public disclosure, all funds benefitting Rio Hondo College?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 81316, "no_votes": 43605, "total_votes": 124921, "percent_yes": 65.09393936968164, "percent_no": 34.906060630318365, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Rio Hondo Community College District to issue $442", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Rio Hondo Community College District to issue $442.2 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms and labs, construct education facilities, repair infrastructure, and improve technology and safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $25 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $28.3 million annually until maturity.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.505662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.028705", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure RH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1643, "fingerprint": "2024|202400579|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400579|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e96c5cdeb65a9f15", "measure_id": "202400579", "measure_letter": "RLS", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure RLS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms/labs for quality education; repair leaky roofs/ outdated electrical/deteriorating plumbing for safe drinking water; improve fire/earthquake safety; remove asbestos/lead, keep schools safe/clean; shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $200,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levies averaging $32 per $100,000 assessed valuation without increasing tax rates ($14,500,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring oversight/spending disclosure, all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13545, "no_votes": 6768, "total_votes": 20313, "percent_yes": 66.68143553389456, "percent_no": 33.31856446610544, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Manhattan Beach Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Manhattan Beach Unified School District to issue $200 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including fixing roofs, electrical and plumbing systems, improving safety features, and removing hazardous materials. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging $32 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.503211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.027464", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure RLS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1640, "fingerprint": "2024|202400575|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400575|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d65ebc96a1b7e629", "measure_id": "202400575", "measure_letter": "RU", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure RU", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve schools by repairing/updating aging classrooms; repairing leaky roofs/windows; removing asbestos, lead, other hazardous materials; renovating, constructing, and equipping classrooms/facilities/sites; shall Los Nietos School District issue $28,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 assessed value ($2,100,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring strict accountability, Independent Citizens' Oversight, annual audits, with no funds for administrator salaries or pensions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3819, "no_votes": 1435, "total_votes": 5254, "percent_yes": 72.68747620860297, "percent_no": 27.312523791397027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Los Nietos School District to issue $28", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Los Nietos School District to issue $28.5 million in bonds to repair and renovate school facilities, including fixing roofs and windows, removing hazardous materials, and constructing new classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.501437", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.026861", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure RU", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1572, "fingerprint": "2024|202400192|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400192|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "22a34600d98e3f09", "measure_id": "202400192", "measure_letter": "RW", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure RW", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure increasing the minimum wage for qualifying hotel workers from $17.55 per hour to $23.00 per hour on July 1, 2024, gradually increasing annually to $29.50 per hour by July 1, 2028, applying cost of living increases starting July 1, 2029, clarifying \"wages\" and \"service charges\" paid to qualifying hotel workers and authorizing the Council to make future amendments to the City's hotel worker minimum compensation standards, starting June 1, 2029, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39949, "no_votes": 35234, "total_votes": 75183, "percent_yes": 53.13568226859795, "percent_no": 46.86431773140205, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases the minimum wage for qualifying hotel workers in Los A...", "summary_text": "This measure increases the minimum wage for qualifying hotel workers in Los Angeles from $17.55 per hour to $23.00 per hour effective July 1, 2024, with gradual annual increases reaching $29.50 per hour by July 1, 2028, followed by cost of living adjustments starting in 2029. The measure also clarifies definitions of \"wages\" and \"service charges\" for hotel workers and gives the City Council authority to amend hotel worker compensation standards beginning June 1, 2029.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.376827", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.965438", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure RW", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10990, "fingerprint": "2024|202400586|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400586|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "aabeb6d8e67a5f49", "measure_id": "202400586", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve quality education and protect student safety by repairing/replacing leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing/sewer systems, outdated heating/cooling systems, portable classrooms, upgrading classrooms/learning technology, and making student safety/school security improvements, shall Redondo Beach Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $278,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying $29.95 per $100,000 assessed value ($14,940,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent oversight, audits, spending disclosure and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23777, "no_votes": 11447, "total_votes": 35224, "percent_yes": 67.50227117874176, "percent_no": 32.497728821258235, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Redondo Beach Unified School District to issue $2...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Redondo Beach Unified School District to issue $278 million in bonds to fund facility repairs, classroom upgrades, technology improvements, and safety enhancements across district schools. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $29.95 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.097381", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.505381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.028542", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1575, "fingerprint": "2024|202400195|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400195|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3eddbe4abf89ed09", "measure_id": "202400195", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall amendments to Article X of the Pasadena City Charter to require the City Council to set limits by ordinance for contract, settlement, and claim approvals, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27254, "no_votes": 4276, "total_votes": 31530, "percent_yes": 86.4383127180463, "percent_no": 13.561687281953695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Contracting/Bidding/Leasing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires the Pasadena City Council to establish ordina...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires the Pasadena City Council to establish ordinance-based limits for approving contracts, settlements, and claims. The measure passed with 90.9% voter approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.377729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.965887", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1616, "fingerprint": "2024|202400240|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400240|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fff742ba614c98dd", "measure_id": "202400240", "measure_letter": "SD", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SD", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Article XVI Redondo Beach Unified School District pertaining to Section 16.1 Board Members, remove the language \u201cwithout compensation, except necessary expenses when acting as a designated representative of the Board of Education as provided in the Education Code of the State of California?\u201d", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18656, "no_votes": 13724, "total_votes": 32380, "percent_yes": 57.61581222977147, "percent_no": 42.38418777022853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure removes language from the Redondo Beach Unified School District'...", "summary_text": "This measure removes language from the Redondo Beach Unified School District's governing document that specified board members serve without compensation, except for necessary expenses when representing the board as provided by state education code.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.397170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.972983", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SD", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1623, "fingerprint": "2024|202400247|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400247|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c0ae144e0433e470", "measure_id": "202400247", "measure_letter": "SEM", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SEM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure that replaces the county-controlled \"Measure H\" 0.25% sales tax with a locally-controlled, independently audited, City of South El Monte revenue source generating approximately $1.6 million annually for South El Monte general services such as public safety, housing programs, parks/recreation, homelessness prevention, and road repairs, by creating a one-quarter cent (0.25%) sales tax that starts when the \"Measure H\" tax ends and continues until repealed by voters be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2767, "no_votes": 1676, "total_votes": 4443, "percent_yes": 62.27774026558631, "percent_no": 37.72225973441369, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure replaces the county-controlled \"Measure H\" 0", "summary_text": "This measure replaces the county-controlled \"Measure H\" 0.25% sales tax with a locally-controlled 0.25% sales tax for the City of South El Monte, generating approximately $1.6 million annually for general services including public safety, housing programs, parks and recreation, homelessness prevention, and road repairs. The local tax would begin when Measure H expires and continue until voters choose to repeal it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.399358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.974424", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SEM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1618, "fingerprint": "2024|202400242|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400242|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "499ad3d1912a16c9", "measure_id": "202400242", "measure_letter": "SFS", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SFS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair deteriorating roads; protect groundwater; shall an ordinance that doesn't tax residential property and exclusively funds the maintenance, repair of Santa Fe Springs' roads using a dedicated annual parcel tax of 7\u00a2 per square foot (commercial lots) and 3\u00bd\u00a2 per square foot (industrial/ vacant lots), for 25 years, a 2% annual inflation adjustment, raising approximately $6,000,000 annually be adopted, requiring audits, citizens oversight, spending disclosure, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5319, "no_votes": 1614, "total_votes": 6933, "percent_yes": 76.7200346170489, "percent_no": 23.279965382951104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 25-year parcel tax in Santa Fe Springs of 7\u00a2 per s...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 25-year parcel tax in Santa Fe Springs of 7\u00a2 per square foot on commercial properties and 3\u00bd\u00a2 per square foot on industrial/vacant properties (excluding residential) to fund road maintenance and repair, with a 2% annual inflation adjustment and citizen oversight requirements. The tax is expected to raise approximately $6 million annually for local road infrastructure improvements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.397781", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.973287", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SFS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1650, "fingerprint": "2024|202400588|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400588|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "de3cd9536ef1e375", "measure_id": "202400588", "measure_letter": "SG", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SG", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities, and instructional technology to support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts, and skilled trades; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, and ventilation; and improve school safety and security systems; shall San Gabriel Unified School District's measure authorizing $178,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately $44 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding (averaging $8,300,000 annually), with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8574, "no_votes": 4368, "total_votes": 12942, "percent_yes": 66.24942049142327, "percent_no": 33.750579508576735, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Gabriel Unified School District to issue $178...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Gabriel Unified School District to issue $178 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, labs, career training facilities, and technology, as well as repair building infrastructure and improve safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $44 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.505972", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.028857", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SG", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1617, "fingerprint": "2024|202400241|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400241|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dab82165422783e6", "measure_id": "202400241", "measure_letter": "SM", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the Special Public Safety Tax for Paramedic Services, Fire Protection and Prevention, and Police Protection in the City of San Marino, estimated to generate $3,700,000 annually, subject to an annual cost of living increase, until 2029?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4867, "no_votes": 1491, "total_votes": 6358, "percent_yes": 76.5492293173954, "percent_no": 23.4507706826046, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues San Marino's existing Special Public Safety Tax for pa...", "summary_text": "This measure continues San Marino's existing Special Public Safety Tax for paramedic services, fire protection, and police protection through 2029, generating an estimated $3.7 million annually with cost of living adjustments.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.397494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.973140", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1645, "fingerprint": "2024|202400581|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400581|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fb8a1f51e10e5197", "measure_id": "202400581", "measure_letter": "SOS", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SOS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/renovate outdated classrooms/labs/schools for quality education, repair/replace leaky roofs, failing electrical systems, deteriorating plumbing/sewer/gas lines, and make earthquake/fire safety/campus security improvements, shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $297,800,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying approximately $29.49 per $100,000 assessed value ($16,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight/audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19294, "no_votes": 14304, "total_votes": 33598, "percent_yes": 57.42603726412286, "percent_no": 42.57396273587714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District to ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District to issue $297,800,000 in bonds to repair and renovate school facilities, including fixing roofs, electrical and plumbing systems, and making safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $29.49 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.503884", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.027780", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SOS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1624, "fingerprint": "2024|202400248|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400248|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f41bd32d0504773a", "measure_id": "202400248", "measure_letter": "SP", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SP", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect South Pasadena's single-family neighborhoods' residential character; maintain local control over local land use; improve affordable housing opportunities for middle/working-class families/individuals/ seniors; retain/attract local businesses; shall an ordinance be adopted retaining existing height limits in single-family residential neighborhoods; restricting multi-unit housing in commercial/mixed-use corridors/neighborhoods including Downtown, Huntington Drive, Ostrich Farm with publicly-reviewed height limits necessary to implement South Pasadena's Housing Element?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7539, "no_votes": 5683, "total_votes": 13222, "percent_yes": 57.01860535471185, "percent_no": 42.98139464528815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance retains existing height limits in single-family residential ne...", "summary_text": "This ordinance retains existing height limits in single-family residential neighborhoods and restricts multi-unit housing development in commercial and mixed-use areas including Downtown, Huntington Drive, and Ostrich Farm areas. The measure maintains current zoning restrictions while requiring public review of any height limits needed to meet the city's Housing Element requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.399628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.974613", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SP", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1641, "fingerprint": "2024|202400576|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400576|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "567fde647ad4a9d3", "measure_id": "202400576", "measure_letter": "ST", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure ST", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve schools by upgrading safety/ security systems, aging learning technology; support student achievement and high school/ college/ career readiness in math, science, engineering/ skilled trades; renovating, constructing, and equipping classrooms/ facilities/ sites; shall Los Nietos School District issue $26,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $28 per $100,000 assessed value ($2,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring strict accountability, Independent Citizens' Oversight, annual audits, with no funds for administrator salaries or pensions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3821, "no_votes": 1407, "total_votes": 5228, "percent_yes": 73.08722264728385, "percent_no": 26.912777352716148, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Los Nietos School District to issue $26", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Los Nietos School District to issue $26.5 million in bonds to upgrade safety systems, renovate classrooms and facilities, and improve educational technology and programs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $28 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.501859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.027012", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure ST", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10979, "fingerprint": "2024|202400225|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400225|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b1c2a6e521b4037e", "measure_id": "202400225", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3126, "no_votes": 1636, "total_votes": 4762, "percent_yes": 65.64468710625788, "percent_no": 34.35531289374212, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would change the City Treasurer position in Los Angeles from an ...", "summary_text": "This measure would change the City Treasurer position in Los Angeles from an elected office to one appointed by the city government. The measure passed with 70% support from voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.086665", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.386656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.970632", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1576, "fingerprint": "2024|202400196|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400196|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5f086a9bf6bcb3f1", "measure_id": "202400196", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an amendment to Article X of the Pasadena City Charter include additional contract selection methods, requiring City Council approval, to deliver significant public capital improvement and infrastructure projects efficiently, timely, and within budget for essential municipal services such as police, fire, public works and parks, resulting in less cost to taxpayers, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28368, "no_votes": 3382, "total_votes": 31750, "percent_yes": 89.348031496063, "percent_no": 10.651968503936999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Contracting/Bidding/Leasing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment adds new contract selection methods for significant pu...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment adds new contract selection methods for significant public capital improvement and infrastructure projects in Pasadena, requiring City Council approval for these alternative procurement approaches. The measure aims to provide more flexible contracting options for essential municipal services including police, fire, public works, and parks projects.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.378024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.966035", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1625, "fingerprint": "2024|202400249|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400249|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bff6c3a00420419a", "measure_id": "202400249", "measure_letter": "TC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure TC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall City of Torrance's Charter (established in 1947) be amended/modernized, compliant with State law, including: Requiring disclosure of all campaign donations to City candidates. Requiring lobbyists to register with the City. Requiring ethics training for all elected officials. Establishing stricter conflict of interest rules on elected officials/City staff. Restricting Mayor/Council members compensation to State of California Minimum Wage rate without raising taxes. Requiring public disclosure, independent audits of all City spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44061, "no_votes": 17855, "total_votes": 61916, "percent_yes": 71.16254279992248, "percent_no": 28.837457200077523, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Torrance's city charter to require campaign donation disc...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Torrance's city charter to require campaign donation disclosure, lobbyist registration, ethics training for officials, stricter conflict of interest rules, public spending audits, and limits mayor and council compensation to minimum wage. The amendments also ensure the charter complies with current state law and modernizes provisions established in 1947.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.399925", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.974811", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure TC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1642, "fingerprint": "2024|202400578|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400578|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "accaf664835e7ebc", "measure_id": "202400578", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and improve aging neighborhood schools to support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts/ skilled trades; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; improve safety/security systems; repair, construct, and acquire classrooms, labs, sites, facilities/equipment; shall Lynwood Unified School District's measure authorizing $80,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $50 per $100,000 assessed value ($4,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9368, "no_votes": 5635, "total_votes": 15003, "percent_yes": 62.44084516430048, "percent_no": 37.55915483569952, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Lynwood Unified School District to issue $80 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Lynwood Unified School District to issue $80 million in bonds to repair and improve school facilities, including fixing roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, and constructing or acquiring classrooms and labs. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $50 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.502754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.027314", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1639, "fingerprint": "2024|202400574|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400574|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "763bcaa87a33d570", "measure_id": "202400574", "measure_letter": "US", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure US", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update school facilities for 21st century student learning and career/college preparedness; improve school facilities for safety, earthquakes and disability access; upgrade plumbing, electrical, HVAC; replace leaky roofs; provide learning technology; and create green outdoor classrooms/schoolyards; shall Los Angeles Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $9,000,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 2.5\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation (generating $456,123,000 annually) until approximately 2059, with audits/citizens' oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 963329, "no_votes": 452919, "total_votes": 1416248, "percent_yes": 68.01979596793782, "percent_no": 31.980204032062176, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Los Angeles Unified School District to issue $9 b...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Los Angeles Unified School District to issue $9 billion in bonds to fund school facility improvements including safety upgrades, earthquake retrofitting, accessibility improvements, infrastructure repairs, technology installations, and outdoor learning spaces. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed property value until around 2059.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.500966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.026702", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure US", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1648, "fingerprint": "2024|202400585|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400585|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0be9882fbefe3e31", "measure_id": "202400585", "measure_letter": "UU", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure UU", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade classrooms, labs, vocational/career technical education spaces; repair leaky roofs, deteriorated restrooms, plumbing, gas/electrical/sewer systems; provide safe drinking water, remove asbestos, mold, lead paint; improve school safety/security; shall Pomona Unified School District's measure authorizing $385,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising $22,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted; requiring citizens' oversight, annual audits, spending disclosure, all funds for Pomona Unified schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33173, "no_votes": 13843, "total_votes": 47016, "percent_yes": 70.55683171686235, "percent_no": 29.443168283137652, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Pomona Unified School District to issue $385 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Pomona Unified School District to issue $385 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and lab upgrades, infrastructure repairs, safety enhancements, and hazardous material removal. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $22.5 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.505063", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.028392", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure UU", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1644, "fingerprint": "2024|202400580|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400580|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0873f248b4fdcb9f", "measure_id": "202400580", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain quality, affordable education by: improving student safety; upgrading science labs, nursing/healthcare, vocational education classrooms; repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos, lead paint, mold; providing safe drinking water; retaining quality teachers; shall Mt. San Antonio Community College District's measure authorizing $750,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, averaging $15 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $40,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring public spending disclosure, citizens' oversight, independent audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140570, "no_votes": 112258, "total_votes": 252828, "percent_yes": 55.59906339487715, "percent_no": 44.40093660512285, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Mt", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Mt. San Antonio Community College District to issue $750 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including safety upgrades, classroom renovations, infrastructure repairs, and hazardous material removal. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $15 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $40 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.503563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.027629", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1656, "fingerprint": "2024|202400594|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400594|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "70c2aa1c30af29b0", "measure_id": "202400594", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; improve technology; and construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Whittier City School District measure authorizing $99,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating approximately $5,400,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at average rates of $30 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16868, "no_votes": 8063, "total_votes": 24931, "percent_yes": 67.65873811720347, "percent_no": 32.34126188279653, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Whittier City School District to issue $99 millio...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Whittier City School District to issue $99 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including roof repairs, safety upgrades, technology improvements, and classroom modernization. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $5.4 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.507751", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.029799", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1626, "fingerprint": "2024|202400250|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400250|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b5c7b426de2c689f", "measure_id": "202400250", "measure_letter": "WH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure WH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure providing funding for general services, including keeping public areas safe/clean; preventing/responding to crime; retaining/attracting local businesses; addressing homelessness; by redirecting to West Hollywood a \u00bc\u00a2 sales tax if a future district sales tax within the County qualifies for a ballot and is enacted, generating approximately $5,000,000 annually in locally controlled revenue for West Hollywood residents until ended by voters, requiring audits/spending disclosure, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15155, "no_votes": 3321, "total_votes": 18476, "percent_yes": 82.02533015804286, "percent_no": 17.974669841957137, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would redirect a quarter-cent sales tax to West Hollywood if a f...", "summary_text": "This measure would redirect a quarter-cent sales tax to West Hollywood if a future county district sales tax is enacted, generating approximately $5 million annually for general city services including public safety, crime prevention, business retention, and homelessness programs. The funding would continue until ended by voters and requires audits and spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.400232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.975007", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure WH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10987, "fingerprint": "2024|202400568|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400568|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "93983e0456912419", "measure_id": "202400568", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To permanently transfer certain territory from the Glendale Unified School District to the La Canada Unified School District. Shall approximately 879 parcels of the Glendale Unified School District be permanently transferred to the La Canada Unified School District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1316, "no_votes": 114, "total_votes": 1430, "percent_yes": 92.02797202797203, "percent_no": 7.972027972027973, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure permanently transfers approximately 879 parcels of land from the...", "summary_text": "This measure permanently transfers approximately 879 parcels of land from the Glendale Unified School District to the La Canada Unified School District.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.093993", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.498872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.025793", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10977, "fingerprint": "2024|202400200|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400200|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "94e572db85509e97", "measure_id": "202400200", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure establishing a ten percent (10%) transient occupancy tax to fund general services in the City of Vernon, such as street and sidewalk repairs, public safety, and City health services, to be paid by hotel guests staying within the City of Vernon, providing an estimated $84,539 annual revenue for general government use until ended by voters, with all funds locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 29, "percent_yes": 89.65517241379311, "percent_no": 10.34482758620689, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 10% transient occupancy tax on hotel guests in Ver...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 10% transient occupancy tax on hotel guests in Vernon, California, to fund general city services including street repairs, public safety, and health services. The tax is estimated to generate approximately $84,539 annually in revenue for general government use until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-04-09", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.082002", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.379188", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.966728", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1578, "fingerprint": "2024|202400198|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400198|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "15020b1335bb5254", "measure_id": "202400198", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure reducing the rate of the City's Transactions and Use Tax from 0.75% to 0.50%, and extending the term of the Transactions and Use Tax by repealing its March 31, 2029 expiration date/sunset, resulting in an average of $5.8M in reduced revenues annually for general government use until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7727, "no_votes": 6377, "total_votes": 14104, "percent_yes": 54.78587634713556, "percent_no": 45.21412365286444, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reduces Los Angeles's transactions and use tax rate from 0", "summary_text": "This measure reduces Los Angeles's transactions and use tax rate from 0.75% to 0.50% while removing the tax's March 31, 2029 expiration date, making it permanent. The change would reduce city revenues by an average of $5.8 million annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.378565", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.966430", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1613, "fingerprint": "2024|202400237|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400237|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "af427e2303ccf608", "measure_id": "202400237", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require that at least ten percent (10%) of the City's annual unrestricted general purpose revenues be allocated to children and youth programs and services by Fiscal Year 2030-2031, in addition to the current funding for children and youth programs, and to establish a City Department of Children and Youth to administer funding for said programs and services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24872, "no_votes": 14958, "total_votes": 39830, "percent_yes": 62.445392919909615, "percent_no": 37.554607080090385, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires Los Angeles to allocate at least 10% of its a...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires Los Angeles to allocate at least 10% of its annual unrestricted general revenues to children and youth programs by fiscal year 2030-2031 and establishes a new City Department of Children and Youth to administer these programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.394761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.972509", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1591, "fingerprint": "2024|202400213|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400213|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0c6b9797cbae3e0d", "measure_id": "202400213", "measure_letter": "YM", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure YM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance protecting Lancaster\u2019s financial stability; maintaining essential services; maintaining 911 response; retaining businesses; maintaining veterans, senior, mental health, and homelessness community programs; by amending the city\u2019s sales and use tax ordinance to provide automatic increase to the sales and use tax rate to the maximum permitted \u2013 whether because another tax expires, the Legislature increases the statutory maximum use tax for the City, or otherwise \u2013 be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26705, "no_votes": 24468, "total_votes": 51173, "percent_yes": 52.18572293983155, "percent_no": 47.81427706016845, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Lancaster's sales and use tax ordinance to automatically ...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Lancaster's sales and use tax ordinance to automatically increase the city's sales tax rate to the maximum amount permitted by law whenever that maximum increases due to factors like other taxes expiring or legislative changes. The revenue would fund general city services including emergency response, business retention programs, and social services for veterans, seniors, and homeless individuals.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.383017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.968756", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure YM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1588, "fingerprint": "2024|202400210|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400210|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ca9b27c6e4cbeedf", "measure_id": "202400210", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and enhance existing City services including public safety, homelessness, roads/streets, and quality of life issues, shall the City\u2019s Measure be adopted approving an ordinance that replaces Los Angeles County\u2019s Measure H upon its sunset or repeal, by enacting a one-quarter percent (0.25%) transactions and use tax providing approximately $3,000,000 annually in general revenue for Glendora, to be levied until ended by the voters, to ensure that all funds stay local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14296, "no_votes": 10496, "total_votes": 24792, "percent_yes": 57.663762504033556, "percent_no": 42.336237495966444, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacts a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacts a 0.25% sales tax in Glendora to replace Los Angeles County's expiring Measure H, generating approximately $3 million annually for general city services including public safety, homelessness programs, road maintenance, and quality of life issues. The tax remains in effect until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.382098", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.968280", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1581, "fingerprint": "2024|202400203|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400203|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "508743a0fb1feae9", "measure_id": "202400203", "measure_letter": "ZZ", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure ZZ", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to maintain locally-generated funding for police, firefighter/ paramedic/ 911 response services; clean up encampments/ address homelessness; fix potholes/ streets; maintain gang enforcement, neighborhood patrols, clean water, parks, community centers, senior services, afterschool programs and other general City services, authorizing a \u00bc\u00a2 sales tax, taking effect when legally permissible, generating approximately $2,500,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits/spending disclosure, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9706, "no_votes": 4674, "total_votes": 14380, "percent_yes": 67.49652294853963, "percent_no": 32.503477051460365, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes a quarter-cent sales tax in Los Angeles to fund vario...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes a quarter-cent sales tax in Los Angeles to fund various city services including police, fire, paramedic services, homeless services, street maintenance, parks, and community programs. The tax is expected to generate approximately $2.5 million annually and includes requirements for audits and spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.380023", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.967188", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure ZZ", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1658, "fingerprint": "2024|202400251|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400251|MADERA", "content_hash": "c7003ee1c02f87c8", "measure_id": "202400251", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MADERA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prevent violent crimes and losing experienced Chowchilla police officers; maintain 911 police, fire, emergency medical response times; provide firefighter training; prevent cuts to fire protection equipment/fire engines; maintain safe parks; and other safety services, shall a measure be adopted to reauthorize Chowchilla\u2019s Measure N 1\u00a2 sales tax, providing $2,500,000 annually only for Chowchilla, until ended by voters, without raising tax rates and continuing oversight/audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3449, "no_votes": 819, "total_votes": 4268, "percent_yes": 80.81068416119962, "percent_no": 19.189315838800383, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reauthorized Chowchilla's existing 1-cent sales tax to fund poli...", "summary_text": "This measure reauthorized Chowchilla's existing 1-cent sales tax to fund police, fire, emergency medical services, and other public safety operations, generating approximately $2.5 million annually. The measure maintains the current tax rate rather than implementing a new increase and includes provisions for ongoing oversight and audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.400517", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.975222", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MADERA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1657, "fingerprint": "2024|202400041|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400041|MADERA", "content_hash": "7f41e4d51472207b", "measure_id": "202400041", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MADERA Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To keep local streets, highways, and infrastructure in good repair; fix potholes, pave local streets; improve highway safety, evacuation routes/emergency vehicle access; retrofit older bridges/overpasses; qualify for matching funds; require 80% of funds for local roads, shall an Ordinance be adopted continuing Madera County\u2019s voter-approved half-cent sales tax without increasing the tax rate, renewing $22,000,000 annually for 20 years starting in 2027, with citizen oversight, audits, public spending disclosure and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27490, "no_votes": 24857, "total_votes": 52347, "percent_yes": 52.5149483255965, "percent_no": 47.4850516744035, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues Madera County's existing half-cent sales tax for 20 ye...", "summary_text": "This measure continues Madera County's existing half-cent sales tax for 20 years starting in 2027, generating approximately $22 million annually for road maintenance, highway safety improvements, and infrastructure repairs. The measure requires 80% of funds to be spent on local roads and includes provisions for citizen oversight and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.325720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.941238", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MADERA Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1674, "fingerprint": "2024|202400596|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400596|MARIN", "content_hash": "fcad768ba37312b4", "measure_id": "202400596", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade local high schools by updating classrooms/ science labs/ classroom technology/ equipment; repairing/ replacing leaking roofs and inefficient heating/ cooling/ electrical/ plumbing systems; updating art/ music classrooms/ facilities; and repairing/ replacing outdated portable classrooms, shall Tamalpais Union High School District's measure be adopted authorizing $517,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($36,000,000 annually) with independent oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24376, "no_votes": 20969, "total_votes": 45345, "percent_yes": 53.756753776601606, "percent_no": 46.243246223398394, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Tamalpais Union High School District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Tamalpais Union High School District to issue $517 million in bonds to repair and upgrade high school facilities, including classrooms, science labs, technology, building systems, and portable classrooms. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.508318", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.030119", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1675, "fingerprint": "2024|202400600|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400600|MARIN", "content_hash": "41be64a47736b003", "measure_id": "202400600", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ upgrade local high/ junior high school classrooms, science labs, technology/ job training facilities; improve fire/ earthquake safety/ campus security; remove hazardous materials like lead/ asbestos; repair leaky roofs, outdated portable classrooms, HVAC, electrical, plumbing; shall Petaluma Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $159,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, at $30 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($9,100,000 annually), with independent oversight, and no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 118, "no_votes": 87, "total_votes": 205, "percent_yes": 57.56097560975609, "percent_no": 42.43902439024391, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Petaluma Joint Union High School District to issue...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Petaluma Joint Union High School District to issue $159 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, labs, safety systems, and infrastructure improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.509557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.030749", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10997, "fingerprint": "2024|202400602|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400602|MARIN", "content_hash": "e4c02a955e7f7d08", "measure_id": "202400602", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To complete high priority repairs and upgrades at local high schools, including replacing classrooms/ science labs/ technology; repairing/ replacing leaky roofs and inefficient heating/ cooling/ electrical/ plumbing systems; updating art/ music classrooms/ facilities; and replacing outdated portable classrooms, shall Tamalpais Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $289,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $18 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($20,700,000 annually) with independent oversight, audits, no funds for administrators and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43939, "no_votes": 22880, "total_votes": 66819, "percent_yes": 65.75824241607926, "percent_no": 34.241757583920744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Tamalpais Union High School District to issue $28...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Tamalpais Union High School District to issue $289 million in bonds to fund repairs and upgrades at local high schools, including replacing classrooms, science labs, roofs, and building systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $18 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.103754", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.510137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.031078", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1673, "fingerprint": "2024|202400595|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400595|MARIN", "content_hash": "bf5711a76d533f73", "measure_id": "202400595", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide locally controlled funding for local junior high/ high schools that cannot be taken away by the state to attract/ retain excellent teachers; enhance math, science, engineering, technology, writing programs; maintain smaller class sizes; and prepare students for college/ careers, shall Petaluma Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted levying an $89 educational parcel tax, raising $2,200,000 annually, for 8 years, with exemptions for seniors, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and independent citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62, "no_votes": 70, "total_votes": 132, "percent_yes": 46.96969696969697, "percent_no": 53.03030303030303, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed an $89 annual parcel tax on properties within ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed an $89 annual parcel tax on properties within the Petaluma Joint Union High School District for 8 years, generating approximately $2.2 million annually for programs including math, science, technology, and writing instruction, teacher retention, and smaller class sizes. The tax included exemptions for senior citizens and prohibited use of funds for administrator salaries, with independent oversight required.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.508038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.029952", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10994, "fingerprint": "2024|202400598|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400598|MARIN", "content_hash": "3ae037de1dcdc23b", "measure_id": "202400598", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide competitive salaries, offer instructional programs including Visual and Performing Arts, support diverse learners, achieve educational goals, and fund school operations, shall Bolinas Stinson Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted levying a $390.00 parcel tax, commencing July 1, 2025 for five years, with a 3% annual increase, and exemptions for persons 65 and older, with an estimated $682,500 generated annually from said assessment?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 807, "no_votes": 313, "total_votes": 1120, "percent_yes": 72.05357142857143, "percent_no": 27.94642857142857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Bolinas Stinson Union School District to levy a $...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Bolinas Stinson Union School District to levy a $390 annual parcel tax for five years starting July 1, 2025, with 3% annual increases and exemptions for residents 65 and older. The tax is estimated to generate $682,500 annually to fund teacher salaries, instructional programs, student support services, and general school operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.103005", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.508879", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.030418", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1669, "fingerprint": "2024|202400252|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400252|MARIN", "content_hash": "e3766d156c88e935", "measure_id": "202400252", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue adjusting its appropriation limit for the annual fire protection and emergency medical services levy, pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, for the period of 07/01/2024 through 6/30/2028? The current levy is $994 per residential dwelling unit, $1,131 per occupancy in commercial structures, and $199 per vacant parcel.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 679, "no_votes": 191, "total_votes": 870, "percent_yes": 78.04597701149424, "percent_no": 21.954022988505756, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the City of Belvedere to continue adjusting its approp...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the City of Belvedere to continue adjusting its appropriation limit for annual fire protection and emergency medical services levies from July 2024 through June 2028. The current levy rates are $994 per residential unit, $1,131 per commercial occupancy, and $199 per vacant parcel.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.400794", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.975432", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1670, "fingerprint": "2024|202400253|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400253|MARIN", "content_hash": "6d076d873d53a487", "measure_id": "202400253", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 1067, establishing a prohibition on residential real property rental rate increases that exceed five percent plus Consumer Price Index or seven percent, whichever is lower, in a twelve-month period annually, and defining a base rent as the rent in effect on May 8, 2023, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2573, "no_votes": 2382, "total_votes": 4955, "percent_yes": 51.92734611503532, "percent_no": 48.07265388496468, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Rent Control", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance caps annual residential rent increases in Marin at the lower o...", "summary_text": "This ordinance caps annual residential rent increases in Marin at the lower of either 5% plus the Consumer Price Index or 7%, using May 8, 2023 rent levels as the baseline. The measure establishes rent control limits on how much landlords can raise rents each year.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.401068", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.975623", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10995, "fingerprint": "2024|202400599|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400599|MARIN", "content_hash": "2518476f05bd3d99", "measure_id": "202400599", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade Bacich Elementary School and Kent Middle School; repair or replace failing roofs; protect safe drinking water; repair deteriorating student restrooms and plumbing; and improve campus fencing, energy and security, shall Kentfield School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $48,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $29 per $100,000 of assessed value ($3,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent oversight, annual audits and all funds locally controlled for Kentfield schools only?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4219, "no_votes": 2762, "total_votes": 6981, "percent_yes": 60.43546769803753, "percent_no": 39.56453230196247, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Kentfield School District to issue $48 million in...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Kentfield School District to issue $48 million in bonds to repair and upgrade Bacich Elementary School and Kent Middle School, including roof repairs, plumbing improvements, campus security enhancements, and other facility improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments of $29 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.103194", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.509230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.030581", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1671, "fingerprint": "2024|202400254|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400254|MARIN", "content_hash": "10f10fc8f5acdabe", "measure_id": "202400254", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the voters of the Town of Ross adopt an ordinance reauthorizing from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2035, the annual special tax for maintaining public safety services at a rate of $1,201.50 per dwelling unit for single family residences and $1,201.50 per parcel for all other uses, subject to an annual Consumer Price Index adjustment, providing about $1 million annually, and increasing the Town's appropriations limit by the amount of the special tax proceeds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 683, "no_votes": 191, "total_votes": 874, "percent_yes": 78.14645308924484, "percent_no": 21.853546910755156, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reauthorizes a special property tax in the Town of Ross from 202...", "summary_text": "This measure reauthorizes a special property tax in the Town of Ross from 2025 to 2035 at a rate of $1,201.50 per dwelling unit or parcel to fund public safety services. The tax is subject to annual Consumer Price Index adjustments and is expected to generate approximately $1 million per year.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.401376", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.975813", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1672, "fingerprint": "2024|202400255|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400255|MARIN", "content_hash": "b3a91fd546bf7705", "measure_id": "202400255", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure be adopted to withdraw the Town of San Anselmo, including all parcels of land in Town, from the Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 9?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3083, "no_votes": 2110, "total_votes": 5193, "percent_yes": 59.368380512228, "percent_no": 40.631619487772, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "General Services: Flood Control/Drainage", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure withdraws the Town of San Anselmo and all its land parcels from t...", "summary_text": "The measure withdraws the Town of San Anselmo and all its land parcels from the Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 9.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.401680", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.976006", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10996, "fingerprint": "2024|202400601|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400601|MARIN", "content_hash": "5cd58012f83529ff", "measure_id": "202400601", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To attract and retain highly-qualified teachers and support staff, continue funding critical academic programs in math, science, reading, writing and arts, maintain manageable class sizes, shall Sausalito Marin City School District\u2019s measure levying a parcel tax at $0.15/building area square foot up to 23,000 square feet, and $25/unimproved parcel, be adopted, providing $1,300,000 annually for 8 years, that can\u2019t be taken by the State, with independent citizen oversight, low income senior exemption, and money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4123, "no_votes": 1762, "total_votes": 5885, "percent_yes": 70.05947323704333, "percent_no": 29.940526762956665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Sausalito Marin City School District to levy a pa...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Sausalito Marin City School District to levy a parcel tax of $0.15 per square foot of building area (up to 23,000 square feet) and $25 per unimproved parcel for 8 years, generating approximately $1,300,000 annually. The funds would support teacher and staff retention, academic programs, and class size management, with provisions for citizen oversight and low-income senior exemptions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.103569", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.509849", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.030916", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1659, "fingerprint": "2024|202400042|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400042|MARIN", "content_hash": "f59c71775aa3fb24", "measure_id": "202400042", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect against climate impacts and establish funding that cannot be taken by the State of California, shall Bel Marin Keys Community Services District\u2019s measure levying a special tax for 21 years to finance costs of maintaining, improving, acquiring and constructing existing and new infrastructure, including locks and levees, and dredging waterways, at an initial annual rate of $1,800 ($150/month) per taxable parcel (generating $1,263,600 in tax year 2024-25), increasing 2.5% annually thereafter, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 661, "no_votes": 169, "total_votes": 830, "percent_yes": 79.63855421686748, "percent_no": 20.361445783132524, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Flood Control/Drainage", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies a special tax on property parcels in the Bel Marin Keys C...", "summary_text": "This measure levies a special tax on property parcels in the Bel Marin Keys Community Services District at an initial rate of $1,800 annually per parcel, increasing 2.5% each year for 21 years to fund flood control infrastructure including locks, levees, and waterway dredging. The tax is expected to generate approximately $1,263,600 in the first year and cannot be redirected by the state.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.326744", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.941408", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10991, "fingerprint": "2024|202400045|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400045|MARIN", "content_hash": "4b43f7fa9507f9ae", "measure_id": "202400045", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of Fairfax Town Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1763, "no_votes": 2640, "total_votes": 4403, "percent_yes": 40.0408812173518, "percent_no": 59.9591187826482, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.099996", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.327720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.941931", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1660, "fingerprint": "2024|202400043|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400043|MARIN", "content_hash": "8c16216209a998fe", "measure_id": "202400043", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the four fiscal years 2024-2025 through 2027-2028 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for Fire Protection and Emergency Response services previously approved by the voters in November, 2011?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1369, "no_votes": 369, "total_votes": 1738, "percent_yes": 78.7686996547756, "percent_no": 21.231300345224398, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases the Marinwood Community Services District's spending l...", "summary_text": "This measure increases the Marinwood Community Services District's spending limit for fiscal years 2024-2025 through 2027-2028 by the amount of revenue generated from a fire protection and emergency response special tax approved by voters in 2011. The increase allows the district to spend the fire tax revenue without being constrained by constitutional appropriations limits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.327107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.941570", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10992, "fingerprint": "2024|202400046|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400046|MARIN", "content_hash": "c7bba1b24ae902ab", "measure_id": "202400046", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted to amend the Fairfax Town Code to repeal the Town\u2019s current Just Cause Eviction Ordinance and Rent Stabilization Ordinance and replace them with just cause eviction and rent stabilization standards in the California Tenant Protection Act of 2019 and prior Town Code?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2991, "no_votes": 1742, "total_votes": 4733, "percent_yes": 63.194591168392144, "percent_no": 36.805408831607856, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure repeals Fairfax's local Just Cause Eviction Ordinance and Rent St...", "summary_text": "The measure repeals Fairfax's local Just Cause Eviction Ordinance and Rent Stabilization Ordinance, replacing them with the standards established in California's statewide Tenant Protection Act of 2019 and previous town regulations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.100182", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.328123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.942123", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1661, "fingerprint": "2024|202400044|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400044|MARIN", "content_hash": "9cfc8eefd824243f", "measure_id": "202400044", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the four fiscal years 2024-2025 through 2027-2028 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for Park, Open Space and Street Landscape Maintenance services previously approved by the voters in November, 2015?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1336, "no_votes": 399, "total_votes": 1735, "percent_yes": 77.0028818443804, "percent_no": 22.997118155619603, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": "Land Use: Open Space", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases the Marinwood Community Services District's spending l...", "summary_text": "This measure increases the Marinwood Community Services District's spending limit for fiscal years 2024-2025 through 2027-2028 by the amount of revenue generated from a voter-approved special tax for park, open space, and street landscape maintenance services. The increase allows the district to spend the special tax revenue without being constrained by the constitutional appropriations limit.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.327395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.941721", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10993, "fingerprint": "2024|202400597|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400597|MARIN", "content_hash": "27a258f8b96203b3", "measure_id": "202400597", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain small class sizes, provide competitive salaries, offer instructional programs that support diverse learners in achieving educational goals, and fund school operations essential to ensuring these accomplishments, should Nicasio School District maintain its parcel tax commencing July 1, 2025 for a period of ten (10) years, with a 3% annual increase, and exemptions for persons 65 and older?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 110, "no_votes": 38, "total_votes": 148, "percent_yes": 74.32432432432432, "percent_no": 25.675675675675677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure maintains Nicasio School District's existing parcel tax for ten y...", "summary_text": "The measure maintains Nicasio School District's existing parcel tax for ten years starting July 1, 2025, with a 3% annual increase and exemptions for residents 65 and older. The tax revenue would fund class size maintenance, teacher salaries, instructional programs, and school operations.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-05-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.102817", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.508588", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.030269", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1662, "fingerprint": "2024|202400047|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400047|MARIN", "content_hash": "746a259455880210", "measure_id": "202400047", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair roads/infrastructure; fix potholes; repave streets; repair retaining walls/bridges; address flooding of roads/buildings; improve bike/pedestrian circulation, safe routes to schools, disabled access; and qualify for federal matching funds/grants, shall the Town of Fairfax\u2019s measure authorizing $18,000,000 of bonds for up to 30 years for each series, at legal interest rates, levying approximately $30/$100,000 of assessed value, raising on average approximately $1,200,000 annually, requiring audits/citizen oversight, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2966, "no_votes": 1815, "total_votes": 4781, "percent_yes": 62.03723070487346, "percent_no": 37.96276929512654, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.328461", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.942317", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1663, "fingerprint": "2024|202400048|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400048|MARIN", "content_hash": "0e510e851b23445f", "measure_id": "202400048", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the proposed ordinance, prohibiting residential real property rental rate increases for some rental units that exceed sixty percent of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index or three percent, whichever is lower, defining a base rent for affected units as the rent in effect on August 3, 2022, establishing a process for consideration of additional rent increases, limiting the grounds for evicting tenants of some rental units, enacting additional housing regulations, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2710, "no_votes": 4434, "total_votes": 7144, "percent_yes": 37.93393057110862, "percent_no": 62.06606942889138, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Rent Control", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have prohibited rent increases on certain residential renta...", "summary_text": "The measure would have prohibited rent increases on certain residential rental units that exceed 60% of the Consumer Price Index increase or 3%, whichever is lower, using August 3, 2022 rent levels as the baseline. It also would have limited eviction grounds for some rental units and established a process for landlords to request additional rent increases beyond the cap.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.328773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.942522", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1664, "fingerprint": "2024|202400049|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400049|MARIN", "content_hash": "f8fe25238a65c4fb", "measure_id": "202400049", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding to maintain city services and facilities, including: wildfire prevention and public safety; roads, bridges, and emergency routes; storm drains; library, recreation, and parks, and general government use, shall the City of Mill Valley enact a one-cent sales tax, providing approximately $4,200,000 annually for ten years, with money staying local, independent audits, and oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6623, "no_votes": 1942, "total_votes": 8565, "percent_yes": 77.32632807939288, "percent_no": 22.67367192060712, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacts a one-cent sales tax in Mill Valley for ten years to gener...", "summary_text": "The measure enacts a one-cent sales tax in Mill Valley for ten years to generate approximately $4.2 million annually for city services including wildfire prevention, public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and parks and recreation. The funding includes provisions for independent audits and oversight to ensure local use of the revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.329105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.942701", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1665, "fingerprint": "2024|202400050|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400050|MARIN", "content_hash": "cdb13a00b21ae364", "measure_id": "202400050", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure continuing locally controlled funding, that the State cannot take away, and maintaining City of Novato\u2019s services, such as: fixing potholes/ streets; maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response, crime/ gang prevention; attracting/ retaining small businesses; maintaining parks/ recreation facilities; enhancing wildfire prevention; and repair aging storm drains; by establishing a 3/4c sales tax in the City of Novato, until ended by voters, for general government use, providing an additional $10,300,000 annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent annual audits be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15151, "no_votes": 11006, "total_votes": 26157, "percent_yes": 57.92330924800244, "percent_no": 42.07669075199756, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75-cent sales tax in the City of Novato to fund general government services including street repairs, emergency response, crime prevention, parks maintenance, wildfire prevention, and storm drain repairs. The tax generates approximately $10.3 million annually and remains in effect until terminated by voters, with oversight and annual audits required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.329424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.942884", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1666, "fingerprint": "2024|202400051|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400051|MARIN", "content_hash": "8c8433ba69354c19", "measure_id": "202400051", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 2024-1185, establishing a prohibition on residential real property annual rental rate increases (applied only to triplexes and larger) that exceed 60% of the Consumer Price Index or 5%, whichever is lower, and defining a base rent as the rent in effect on June 21, 2023, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2756, "no_votes": 4714, "total_votes": 7470, "percent_yes": 36.8942436412316, "percent_no": 63.1057563587684, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Rent Control", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.329724", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.943100", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1667, "fingerprint": "2024|202400052|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400052|MARIN", "content_hash": "f70c20ad22e4b586", "measure_id": "202400052", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure requiring owners of residential properties of 3 or more units (ADUs exempted) who terminate a tenancy for no tenant fault or lease violation on the tenant\u2019s part, provide measures such as longer notice, payment of relocation benefits if the tenant is required to move, the right to return to the unit upon similar terms if landlord re-rents within 5 years, and requiring payment for temporary tenant displacements, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2556, "no_votes": 5004, "total_votes": 7560, "percent_yes": 33.80952380952381, "percent_no": 66.19047619047619, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.330009", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.943291", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1668, "fingerprint": "2024|202400053|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400053|MARIN", "content_hash": "52933249965febbc", "measure_id": "202400053", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, to levy an annual special parcel tax in the City of San Rafael to fund the construction of a new Albert Park main library and community center, at the rate of $0.145 per square foot of improved building area and $75.00 per vacant parcel, estimated to generate $6,370,000 annually, and continuing for thirty years or until construction bonds are satisfied, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12375, "no_votes": 11413, "total_votes": 23788, "percent_yes": 52.02202791323356, "percent_no": 47.97797208676644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure levies an annual special parcel tax in San Rafael at $0", "summary_text": "The measure levies an annual special parcel tax in San Rafael at $0.145 per square foot of improved building area and $75 per vacant parcel to fund construction of a new Albert Park main library and community center. The tax is estimated to generate $6,370,000 annually and will continue for thirty years or until construction bonds are satisfied.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.330308", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.943501", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1676, "fingerprint": "2024|202400054|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400054|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "57cf10a04e0c810e", "measure_id": "202400054", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MENDOCINO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Should the Mendocino County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar ($1) per vehicle and an additional two dollars ($2) for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten\u00adyear term for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18293, "no_votes": 4877, "total_votes": 23170, "percent_yes": 78.95123003884333, "percent_no": 21.048769961156665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews Mendocino County's Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program fo...", "summary_text": "This measure renews Mendocino County's Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program for ten years, continuing fees of $1 per vehicle and an additional $2 for certain commercial vehicles. The program funds the removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles in the county.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.330623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.943689", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MENDOCINO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1677, "fingerprint": "2024|202400256|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400256|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "93210010f6c38aac", "measure_id": "202400256", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MENDOCINO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure providing Fort Bragg funding for city services, such police and fire protection; 911 emergency medical response; natural disaster preparation; providing affordable workforce housing; addressing homelessness; storm drain maintenance for clean water; recreation programs; and general government services by establishing a locally controlled 3/8c sales tax providing approximately $800,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring independent audits and public disclosure of all spending, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1876, "no_votes": 869, "total_votes": 2745, "percent_yes": 68.3424408014572, "percent_no": 31.6575591985428, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 3/8 cent sales tax in Fort Bragg to fund city serv...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 3/8 cent sales tax in Fort Bragg to fund city services including police, fire protection, emergency medical response, affordable housing, homelessness programs, storm drain maintenance, recreation programs, and general government services. The tax is expected to generate approximately $800,000 annually and includes requirements for independent audits and public disclosure of spending.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.401999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.976193", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MENDOCINO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1678, "fingerprint": "2024|202400257|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400257|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "0d35ceff10ac63bd", "measure_id": "202400257", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MENDOCINO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure providing Fort Bragg funding to reduce tourist impacts; keep public spaces, parks, beaches, and bathrooms safe, clean, and free of litter; support local businesses; and other general government services by increasing a locally controlled transient occupancy (hotel) tax by 2% (paid only by hotel/lodging guests), providing approximately $400,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring independent audits and public disclosure of all spending, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2167, "no_votes": 492, "total_votes": 2659, "percent_yes": 81.49680330951486, "percent_no": 18.50319669048514, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Fort Bragg's transient occupancy tax by 2% on hotel an...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Fort Bragg's transient occupancy tax by 2% on hotel and lodging guests to fund services that address tourist impacts, maintain public spaces and parks, and support local businesses. The tax is expected to generate approximately $400,000 annually and requires independent audits and public disclosure of spending.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.402383", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.976384", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MENDOCINO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1680, "fingerprint": "2024|202400259|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400259|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "b250e649be3c980d", "measure_id": "202400259", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MENDOCINO Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ukiah City Code Section 1752 be amended to increase from the current 10% to 13% the transient occupancy tax imposed on the room rate charged to customers of hotels and motels and vacation rentals in the city of Ukiah?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2383, "no_votes": 3294, "total_votes": 5677, "percent_yes": 41.976395983794255, "percent_no": 58.023604016205745, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.402936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.976765", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MENDOCINO Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1679, "fingerprint": "2024|202400258|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400258|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "abaff7769cbb8b9a", "measure_id": "202400258", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MENDOCINO Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure providing Point Arena funding for city services, such as public safety, pier operations, and general government services by establishing a 7/8-cent or 0.875% sales tax providing approximately $90,000 annually until ended by voters, and requiring independent audits and public disclosure of all spending, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 141, "no_votes": 38, "total_votes": 179, "percent_yes": 78.77094972067039, "percent_no": 21.229050279329613, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.875% sales tax in Point Arena to fund city services including public safety, pier operations, and general government services, generating approximately $90,000 annually. The measure includes requirements for independent audits and public disclosure of spending, and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.402662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.976572", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MENDOCINO Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1686, "fingerprint": "2024|202400264|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400264|MERCED", "content_hash": "58ae91bb7c8a5623", "measure_id": "202400264", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure 2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Douglas Begonia, Jr., be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember of the City of Los Banos?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2699, "no_votes": 608, "total_votes": 3307, "percent_yes": 81.61475657695797, "percent_no": 18.385243423042027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Douglas Begonia, Jr", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Douglas Begonia, Jr. from his position as Councilmember of the City of Los Banos. The measure passed, resulting in Begonia's removal from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.404387", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.977582", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure 2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1687, "fingerprint": "2024|202400265|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400265|MERCED", "content_hash": "daa645277a845682", "measure_id": "202400265", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure 3", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Brett Jones be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember of the City of Los Banos?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2594, "no_votes": 840, "total_votes": 3434, "percent_yes": 75.53873034362259, "percent_no": 24.46126965637741, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure recalls Brett Jones from his position as a City Councilmember in...", "summary_text": "This measure recalls Brett Jones from his position as a City Councilmember in Los Banos, California. The recall passed, removing Jones from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.404652", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.977729", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure 3", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1684, "fingerprint": "2024|202400262|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400262|MERCED", "content_hash": "f064d1049469070b", "measure_id": "202400262", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted to convert an existing sales tax of \u00bd percent to a special tax to be in effect until March 31, 2044, without raising current tax rates, providing approximately $8,000,000 annually, with annual audits and citizen oversight, with 95% of tax proceeds to be used only for police protection and fire protection and 5% to be used for road and street maintenance and improvement?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8064, "no_votes": 3704, "total_votes": 11768, "percent_yes": 68.52481305234535, "percent_no": 31.47518694765465, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure converts Merced's existing \u00bd percent sales tax into a special ta...", "summary_text": "This measure converts Merced's existing \u00bd percent sales tax into a special tax that will continue until March 31, 2044, generating approximately $8 million annually for police protection (95%) and road maintenance (5%). The measure maintains current tax rates rather than creating a new tax, and includes provisions for annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.403801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.977261", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1688, "fingerprint": "2024|202400603|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400603|MERCED", "content_hash": "584195a2ceb34fff", "measure_id": "202400603", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air- conditioning systems; and improve, modernize, and renovate safety and security operations, classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Delhi Unified School District issue $17,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $990,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 564, "no_votes": 563, "total_votes": 1127, "percent_yes": 50.04436557231588, "percent_no": 49.95563442768412, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.510467", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.031245", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1682, "fingerprint": "2024|202400260|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400260|MERCED", "content_hash": "9bd1e1521ac6b822", "measure_id": "202400260", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2027, "no_votes": 3264, "total_votes": 5291, "percent_yes": 38.31033831033831, "percent_no": 61.68966168966169, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.403207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.976956", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1683, "fingerprint": "2024|202400261|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400261|MERCED", "content_hash": "e0d62c2100d14cf5", "measure_id": "202400261", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years? (A \u201cno\u201d vote would retain the current two-year term.)", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1242, "no_votes": 4133, "total_votes": 5375, "percent_yes": 23.10697674418605, "percent_no": 76.89302325581394, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have extended the mayor's term of office in Merced, Califo...", "summary_text": "This measure would have extended the mayor's term of office in Merced, California from two years to four years.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.403480", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.977109", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1689, "fingerprint": "2024|202400604|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400604|MERCED", "content_hash": "54d7b2da6f78a662", "measure_id": "202400604", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and improve, modernize, and renovate safety and securityoperations, classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Delhi Unified School District issue $17,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $990,000 annually aslong as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1856, "no_votes": 1374, "total_votes": 3230, "percent_yes": 57.46130030959752, "percent_no": 42.53869969040248, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Delhi Unified School District to issue $17 million in...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Delhi Unified School District to issue $17 million in bonds to replace HVAC systems and improve school facilities including classrooms, restrooms, and safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $990,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.510788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.031406", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1693, "fingerprint": "2024|202400608|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400608|MERCED", "content_hash": "39bdd39d0992905d", "measure_id": "202400608", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade local elementary /middle schools; improve school safety/ security, repair electrical systems; replace outdated plumbing to provide safe, clean drinking water; construct a new school to relieve overcrowding; upgrade classrooms to meet modern technology standards; shall Weaver Union School District\u2019s measure to issue $20,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, raising approximately $1,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, at rates averaging $28 per $100,000 assessed value, with oversight, annual audits, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2847, "no_votes": 1277, "total_votes": 4124, "percent_yes": 69.03491755577109, "percent_no": 30.965082444228912, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Weaver Union School District to issue $20 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Weaver Union School District to issue $20 million in bonds to repair and upgrade elementary and middle schools, including safety improvements, electrical and plumbing repairs, construction of a new school to address overcrowding, and classroom technology upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $28 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising approximately $1.5 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.512005", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.032069", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1685, "fingerprint": "2024|202400263|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400263|MERCED", "content_hash": "0ebfb7b1057abcde", "measure_id": "202400263", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure adopting the City of Livingston\u2019s one-percent local sales tax for police and fire purposes, including improving emergency response, maintaining a local fire station, equipping police and fire, and acquiring, constructing, renovating, improving, operating and maintaining police and fire facilities, generating approximately $2,310,300 annually in perpetuity, under local control, subject to citizen oversight, an annual audit, and accountability provisions be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2767, "no_votes": 1149, "total_votes": 3916, "percent_yes": 70.658835546476, "percent_no": 29.341164453524, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopts a 1% local sales tax in Livingston to fund police and fir...", "summary_text": "This measure adopts a 1% local sales tax in Livingston to fund police and fire services, including emergency response improvements, maintaining fire stations, equipment purchases, and facility construction and maintenance, generating approximately $2.31 million annually. The tax is permanent and includes provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.404117", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.977420", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1690, "fingerprint": "2024|202400605|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400605|MERCED", "content_hash": "d9ec79b936940374", "measure_id": "202400605", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs/HVAC systems; make health and safety improvements; and improve physical education facilities and fields, shall the Hilmar Unified School District measure authorizing $43,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, raising on average $2,400,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at approximately $56 per $100,000 of assessed value, be adopted, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all money spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1159, "no_votes": 2560, "total_votes": 3719, "percent_yes": 31.16429147620328, "percent_no": 68.83570852379671, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.511076", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.031569", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1691, "fingerprint": "2024|202400606|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400606|MERCED", "content_hash": "c581714009232afb", "measure_id": "202400606", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade neighborhood schools, leaky roofs, outdated electrical systems, plumbing; remove asbestos, lead paint, mold; provide safe drinking water; reduce overcrowding by building school facilities; make security/fire/safety improvements; shall Merced City School District\u2019s measure authorizing $80,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, be adopted, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $5,500,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, oversight, public spending disclosure, all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17869, "no_votes": 9306, "total_votes": 27175, "percent_yes": 65.75528978840846, "percent_no": 34.24471021159154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Merced City School District to issue $80 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Merced City School District to issue $80 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including fixing roofs, electrical and plumbing systems, removing hazardous materials, and building new facilities to reduce overcrowding. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.511395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.031737", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1692, "fingerprint": "2024|202400607|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400607|MERCED", "content_hash": "993f61c22a442158", "measure_id": "202400607", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade/expand classrooms, labs, and career training facilities at the Merced College Los Banos Campus to improve access to affordable, high-quality education/careers in science, healthcare, technology, agriculture, and skilled trades, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2024-1 of Merced Community College District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $46,000,000 in bonds at legal rates (without increasing tax rates), levying $17/$100,000 assessed value ($3,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with oversight/all funds for the Los Banos Campus only?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12345, "no_votes": 3726, "total_votes": 16071, "percent_yes": 76.81538174351316, "percent_no": 23.184618256486843, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes $46 million in bonds to upgrade and expand classrooms...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes $46 million in bonds to upgrade and expand classrooms, labs, and career training facilities at Merced College's Los Banos Campus for programs in science, healthcare, technology, agriculture, and skilled trades. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $17 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.511709", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.031908", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1681, "fingerprint": "2024|202400055|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400055|MERCED", "content_hash": "1fee5e61731cb004", "measure_id": "202400055", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To enhance funding for public safety services in Merced County, including the Sheriff\u2019s Department, District Attorney\u2019s Office, and Fire Department; and to provide direct allocations to city public safety departments in the County, shall Merced County enact a 0.5% retail transactions (sales) and use tax raising an estimated twenty-five million dollars annually for 30 years, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and funds that cannot be taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44921, "no_votes": 35348, "total_votes": 80269, "percent_yes": 55.96307416312649, "percent_no": 44.03692583687351, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.330944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.943895", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1696, "fingerprint": "2024|202400609|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400609|MONO", "content_hash": "5670902ade571681", "measure_id": "202400609", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONO Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Mammoth Unified School District\u2019s measure to construct below-market rental housing to attract/retain qualified teachers/staff, classrooms, and physical education facilities; repair roofs; and update heating/air conditioning be adopted, authorizing $70 million in bonds, at legal rates, levying approximately $37 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $4.5 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and full disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1003, "no_votes": 886, "total_votes": 1889, "percent_yes": 53.09687665431445, "percent_no": 46.90312334568555, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Mammoth Unified School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Mammoth Unified School District to issue $70 million in bonds to construct below-market rental housing for teachers and staff, build classrooms and physical education facilities, repair roofs, and update heating and air conditioning systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes of approximately $37 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising about $4.5 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.512322", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.032235", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONO Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1698, "fingerprint": "2024|202400611|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400611|MONO", "content_hash": "b531bb63751c6af2", "measure_id": "202400611", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Mammoth Unified School District's measure to construct classrooms; upgrade heating, air conditioning and ventilation systems; improve school facilities; and construct teacher/staff housing to attract and retain qualified employees be adopted, authorizing $70 million in bonds, at legal rates, levying approximately $37 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $4.5 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and full disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1988, "no_votes": 1593, "total_votes": 3581, "percent_yes": 55.515219212510466, "percent_no": 44.484780787489534, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes Mammoth Unified School District to issue $70 million i...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes Mammoth Unified School District to issue $70 million in bonds to construct classrooms, upgrade HVAC systems, improve school facilities, and build teacher/staff housing. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately $37 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising about $4.5 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.512992", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.032548", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1694, "fingerprint": "2024|202400056|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400056|MONO", "content_hash": "c72a971113f2fb14", "measure_id": "202400056", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund essential Mono County services, including affordable and workforce housing; public safety and emergency services; childcare; street maintenance and pothole repair; county parks; public health and healthcare; economic development; and other general government use; shall the ordinance increasing Transient Occupancy Tax from 12% to 15% paid only by hotel and short-term rental guests in unincorporated Mono County, providing approximately an additional $1,100,000 annually, subject to annual public review and audits, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3489, "no_votes": 2271, "total_votes": 5760, "percent_yes": 60.572916666666664, "percent_no": 39.427083333333336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure increased the Transient Occupancy Tax from 12% to 15% for...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure increased the Transient Occupancy Tax from 12% to 15% for hotel and short-term rental guests in unincorporated Mono County, generating approximately $1,100,000 annually for county services including housing, public safety, childcare, infrastructure maintenance, parks, healthcare, and economic development. The tax increase is subject to annual public review and audits and will continue until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.331256", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.944100", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1695, "fingerprint": "2024|202400266|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400266|MONO", "content_hash": "9ab5c2408cca7097", "measure_id": "202400266", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support general town services - without increasing taxes on Mammoth Lakes residents - such as providing affordable workforce housing through the Town's Housing Now! Program, supporting public safety, enhancing disaster preparedness, repairing roads, improving recreation amenities and supporting snow removal, shall the Town of Mammoth Lakes' measure increasing the transient occupancy tax by 2% be adopted, generating approximately $4,000,000 annually for 10-years, paid only by hotel and short-term rental guests, with annual audits and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1866, "no_votes": 1061, "total_votes": 2927, "percent_yes": 63.75128117526477, "percent_no": 36.24871882473523, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Mammoth Lakes' transient occupancy tax by 2% on hotel ...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Mammoth Lakes' transient occupancy tax by 2% on hotel and short-term rental guests for 10 years, generating approximately $4 million annually for general town services including affordable housing, public safety, infrastructure, and recreation. The tax applies only to visitors staying in hotels and short-term rentals, not to permanent residents.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.404962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.977878", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1697, "fingerprint": "2024|202400610|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400610|MONO", "content_hash": "7043c53cc7cad559", "measure_id": "202400610", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Bishop Unified School District's measure to repair/ replace deteriorating plumbing, roofs, electrical, heating and air-conditioning systems and update career training facilities, classrooms, and Bishop Union High School's historic main building be adopted, authorizing $46.3 million with legal rates, audits, average levies below $52 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $2.9 million annually) while outstanding, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and full disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 175, "no_votes": 82, "total_votes": 257, "percent_yes": 68.09338521400778, "percent_no": 31.90661478599222, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Bishop Unified School District to issue $46", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Bishop Unified School District to issue $46.3 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities including plumbing, roofs, electrical systems, HVAC, career training facilities, classrooms, and the historic main building at Bishop Union High School. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging below $52 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $2.9 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.512716", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.032398", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1719, "fingerprint": "2024|202400618|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400618|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b4c62f9cdbdb1b08", "measure_id": "202400618", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade/repair schools and classrooms for science, technology, arts, athletics, math and career technology education, create teacher-staff rental housing to attract/ retain highly qualified teachers; improve school safety/ security; update roofs, electrical, plumbing, ventilation systems, shall Monterey Peninsula Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $340,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted levying approximately 5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, averaging $19,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22742, "no_votes": 12860, "total_votes": 35602, "percent_yes": 63.878433795854164, "percent_no": 36.121566204145836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District to issue $340 million in bonds to upgrade school facilities, build teacher housing, and improve safety systems, funded through a property tax of approximately 5 cents per $100 of assessed value. The bonds would generate an average of $19.3 million annually while outstanding, with citizen oversight and restrictions preventing funds from being used for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.515262", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.033681", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1699, "fingerprint": "2024|202400057|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400057|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "2305ad317e46a030", "measure_id": "202400057", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund critical County of Monterey services, including street maintenance and pothole repair; enhanced public safety, emergency services and disaster response, prevention, and recovery; programs to reduce homelessness; libraries, parks, and recreation facilities; water and sewer infrastructure; healthcare; clean and affordable drinking water and other services; shall the County of Monterey\u2019s transaction and use tax be increased in unincorporated areas by 1%, providing approximately $29,000,000 annually, to be spent locally only, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24454, "no_votes": 21398, "total_votes": 45852, "percent_yes": 53.332460961353924, "percent_no": 46.667539038646076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases the sales tax by 1% in unincorporated areas of Montere...", "summary_text": "This measure increases the sales tax by 1% in unincorporated areas of Monterey County to fund various county services including street maintenance, public safety, homelessness programs, libraries, parks, water infrastructure, and healthcare. The tax is expected to generate approximately $29 million annually and will continue until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.331579", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.944296", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1720, "fingerprint": "2024|202400619|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400619|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "6bddfb3f9743a34c", "measure_id": "202400619", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With no projected increase to current tax rates, shall Pacific Grove Unified School District\u2019s measure to renovate existing classrooms; replace deteriorating electrical wiring; expand Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics facilities at Forest Grove Elementary School, Robert Down Elementary School, Pacific Grove Middle School,Pacific Grove Adult Education Center, Pacific Grove Community High School and Pacific Grove High School be adopted, authorizing $78 million of bonds at legal rates, annual audits, average levies below $32 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (approximately $4,700,000 annually) while outstanding, citizens\u2019 oversight, and full disclosure of spending with funds that cannot be spent elsewhere?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6963, "no_votes": 2593, "total_votes": 9556, "percent_yes": 72.86521557136876, "percent_no": 27.134784428631235, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes $78 million in bonds for Pacific Grove Unified School...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes $78 million in bonds for Pacific Grove Unified School District to renovate classrooms, replace electrical wiring, and expand STEAM facilities across six schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below $32 per $100,000 of assessed valuation annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.515584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.033844", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1711, "fingerprint": "2024|202400278|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400278|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a272f6ba185138ef", "measure_id": "202400278", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the term of office for Mayor be four years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5637, "no_votes": 4018, "total_votes": 9655, "percent_yes": 58.384256861729675, "percent_no": 41.615743138270325, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changes the term of office for the Mayor of Monterey from its cu...", "summary_text": "This measure changes the term of office for the Mayor of Monterey from its current length to four years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.408764", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.979776", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1726, "fingerprint": "2024|202400627|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400627|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "412d1b4b7223f596", "measure_id": "202400627", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Coalinga College with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall West Hills Community College District\u2019s measure to expand career training/technical educational classrooms and facilities; renovate outdated classrooms, labs, and student dorms; and improve campus safety be adopted, authorizing $19 million of bonds with estimated average levies below $24 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (approximately $1 million annually) while outstanding, with legal rates, audits, independent oversight and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 15, "percent_yes": 60.0, "percent_no": 40.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the West Hills Community College District to issue $1...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the West Hills Community College District to issue $19 million in bonds to expand career training facilities, renovate classrooms and labs, update student dorms, and improve campus safety at Coalinga College. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes with an estimated average levy of $24 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.518193", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.035156", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1712, "fingerprint": "2024|202400279|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400279|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "9b04ffff6f763e76", "measure_id": "202400279", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance\u00a02027, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Seaside, repealing and replacing Chapter 8.32 of the Seaside Municipal Code to prohibit the sale, purchase, possession, storage and use of all fireworks, including safe and sane fireworks, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4508, "no_votes": 5296, "total_votes": 9804, "percent_yes": 45.981232150142795, "percent_no": 54.018767849857205, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.409044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.979926", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1714, "fingerprint": "2024|202400613|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400613|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "2e414417e4ff79e8", "measure_id": "202400613", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s measure to renovate/modernize classrooms; expand coding, robotics and engineering workshops; replace leaky roofs; and upgrade fire alarms and emergency communication systems at Aromas School, San Juan School, and Anzar High be adopted, authorizing $44 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $55 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $2.7 million annually while outstanding), citizens\u2019 oversight, and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 757, "no_votes": 636, "total_votes": 1393, "percent_yes": 54.343144292893044, "percent_no": 45.656855707106956, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Aromas-San Juan Unified School Distric...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue $44 million in bonds to renovate classrooms, upgrade facilities, and improve safety systems at three schools. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes averaging less than $55 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.513695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.032871", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1723, "fingerprint": "2024|202400622|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400622|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "1953a5756a7e4d80", "measure_id": "202400622", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Soledad Unified School District\u2019s measure to renovate, repair and improve all schools throughout the District: ensure Americans with Disability Act (ADA) compliance; and construct a new track and field at Soledad High School be adopted, authorizing $42 million of bonds with average levies below $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $2.5 million annually) while outstanding, legal rates, audits, citizen oversight and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2936, "no_votes": 1757, "total_votes": 4693, "percent_yes": 62.56126145322821, "percent_no": 37.43873854677179, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Soledad Unified School District to issue $42 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Soledad Unified School District to issue $42 million in bonds to renovate and repair schools throughout the district, ensure ADA compliance, and construct a new track and field at Soledad High School. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $2.5 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.516727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.034335", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1722, "fingerprint": "2024|202400621|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400621|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a003c3abc9d299d5", "measure_id": "202400621", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade neighborhood schools, attract/retain quality teachers by repairing deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms, roofs; upgrading classrooms/science labs, school security, fire safety; removing hazardous materials; providing safe drinking water, career/college training; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, shall Salinas Union High School District\u2019s measure authorizing $115,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $19/$100,000 assessed value ($7,300,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring annual independent audits/citizens\u2019 oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31721, "no_votes": 18712, "total_votes": 50433, "percent_yes": 62.89730930144945, "percent_no": 37.10269069855055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Salinas Union High School District to issue $115 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Salinas Union High School District to issue $115 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including classroom repairs, safety upgrades, hazardous material removal, and equipment upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $19 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $7.3 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.516369", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.034174", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1724, "fingerprint": "2024|202400623|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400623|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "6846a9b3df402c28", "measure_id": "202400623", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade deteriorating academic/ vocational classrooms; replace outdated science/ technology/ computer labs; provide classrooms for future first responders; remove hazardous materials like asbestos, mold, lead paint; construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities, sites, and equipment, shall South Monterey County Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $35,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 assessed valuation, providing approximately $2,600,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, supporting local schools, requiring citizen oversight/ audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4827, "no_votes": 2964, "total_votes": 7791, "percent_yes": 61.95610319599538, "percent_no": 38.04389680400462, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the South Monterey County Joint Union High School Dis...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the South Monterey County Joint Union High School District to issue $35 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms and labs, remove hazardous materials, and construct or repair school facilities and equipment. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $2.6 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.517023", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.034495", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1725, "fingerprint": "2024|202400624|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400624|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "2b3b911d051bc1a7", "measure_id": "202400624", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade emergency communication systems, fire alarms/sprinklers, safety door locks, security cameras,; repair deteriorating classrooms, restrooms; replace outdated, unsafe portables, electrical wiring; earthquake retrofit classrooms/ buildings; and construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities, sites, and equipment, shall South Monterey County Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $35,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 assessed valuation, providing approximately $2,600,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, supporting local schools, requiring citizen oversight/audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4822, "no_votes": 2965, "total_votes": 7787, "percent_yes": 61.92371901887762, "percent_no": 38.07628098112238, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the South Monterey County Joint Union High School Dis...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the South Monterey County Joint Union High School District to issue $35 million in bonds to fund safety upgrades, facility repairs, and construction projects including emergency systems, classroom improvements, and earthquake retrofitting. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $2.6 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.517315", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.034655", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1715, "fingerprint": "2024|202400614|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400614|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "543b46ab45544063", "measure_id": "202400614", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair leaky roofs; make safety and security improvements, including fire alarms, fencing, electrical and plumbing; modernize/upgrade classrooms, bathrooms and a new science lab, shall Chualar Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted issuing $5,600,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying average rates of $29.79 per $100,000 of assessed value and generating approximately $353,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with strict accountability, citizen's oversight, annual audits, and NO money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 330, "no_votes": 188, "total_votes": 518, "percent_yes": 63.7065637065637, "percent_no": 36.2934362934363, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Chualar Union School District to issue $5", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Chualar Union School District to issue $5.6 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, safety and security upgrades, classroom and bathroom modernization, and construction of a new science lab. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of $29.79 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating approximately $353,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.513983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.033033", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1716, "fingerprint": "2024|202400615|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400615|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "313bcb0484d4de80", "measure_id": "202400615", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall King City Union School District\u2019s measure to repair leaky roofs and plumbing; replace deteriorating electrical, heating, and air-conditioning systems; and renovate classrooms at Del Rey Elementary, Santa Lucia Elementary, Chalone Peaks Middle, Arts Magnet School and Early Education Center be adopted, authorizing $19.8 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $26 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $1,400,000 annually while outstanding), citizen oversight, public disclosure of spending, and no projected increase in taxes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2120, "no_votes": 1103, "total_votes": 3223, "percent_yes": 65.7772261867825, "percent_no": 34.2227738132175, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the King City Union School District to issue $19", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the King City Union School District to issue $19.8 million in bonds to fund repairs and renovations at five schools, including fixing roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and HVAC equipment. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging below $26 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.514341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.033196", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1717, "fingerprint": "2024|202400616|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400616|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7865432566fc4cdc", "measure_id": "202400616", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall King City Union School District\u2019s measure to improve school safety; ensure accessibility for disabled individuals; and update classroom technology at Del Rey Elementary, Santa Lucia Elementary, Chalone Peaks Middle, Arts Magnet School and Early Education Center be adopted, authorizing $21.6 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $1,500,000 annually while outstanding), citizen oversight, public disclosure of spending and no projected increase in taxes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2118, "no_votes": 1099, "total_votes": 3217, "percent_yes": 65.83773702207026, "percent_no": 34.16226297792974, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the King City Union School District to issue $21", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the King City Union School District to issue $21.6 million in bonds to improve school safety, accessibility for disabled individuals, and classroom technology at five district schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $1.5 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.514652", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.033359", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1721, "fingerprint": "2024|202400620|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400620|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f446f00665f37002", "measure_id": "202400620", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Pajaro Valley Unified School District\u2019s measure to renovate classrooms; expand career/ technical education programs including robotics and coding; and replace outdated plumbing,\u00a0 leaking pipes and aging electrical wiring be adopted, authorizing $315 million of bonds with levies less than $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $18.3 million annually) while outstanding, legal rates, annual audits, independent oversight, eligibility for state matching funds and full public disclosure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1660, "no_votes": 948, "total_votes": 2608, "percent_yes": 63.65030674846626, "percent_no": 36.34969325153374, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Pajaro Valley Unified School District to issue $3...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Pajaro Valley Unified School District to issue $315 million in bonds to renovate classrooms, expand career and technical education programs, and replace aging infrastructure including plumbing and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of less than $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $18.3 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.515874", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.034012", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1718, "fingerprint": "2024|202400617|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400617|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "88460cf2f2c9e12c", "measure_id": "202400617", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of local schools; construct, repair, and rehabilitate aging classrooms and student support facilities, including making security, health, and safety improvements; shall Mission Union School District\u2019s measure issuing $1,500,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $114,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at average rates of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76, "no_votes": 36, "total_votes": 112, "percent_yes": 67.85714285714286, "percent_no": 32.14285714285714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Mission Union School District to issue $1", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Mission Union School District to issue $1.5 million in bonds to construct, repair, and rehabilitate school facilities and make security, health, and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $114,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.514942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.033521", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10998, "fingerprint": "2024|202400625|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400625|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "72a81df0bd67a4f5", "measure_id": "202400625", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade neighborhood schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs, plumbing/restrooms, smoke/fire alarms, outdated electrical/ sewer systems; maintaining safety; providing safe drinking water; removing asbestos, lead paint, mold; shall Spreckels Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $27,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation, averaging $5,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring citizens oversight, audits, public spending disclosure, funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1943, "no_votes": 1869, "total_votes": 3812, "percent_yes": 50.970619097586564, "percent_no": 49.029380902413436, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Spreckels Union School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Spreckels Union School District to issue $27 million in bonds to fund repairs and upgrades to school facilities, including fixing roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and removing hazardous materials. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.113756", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.517605", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.034828", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1713, "fingerprint": "2024|202400612|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400612|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "38fc372d73edd049", "measure_id": "202400612", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve health, safety and security, including replacing fire alarms, fencing and roofs; modernize aging infrastructure, classrooms, technology; and build a science lab; shall Chuarar Union School District's measure be adopted to issue $5,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying approximately $30.00 \udbc0\udc02er $100,000 of assessed property value and generating an average of $360,500 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizen's oversight, annual audits, all funds staying local and no money for administrators' safaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 127, "no_votes": 133, "total_votes": 260, "percent_yes": 48.84615384615385, "percent_no": 51.15384615384615, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Chualar Union School District to issue $5", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Chualar Union School District to issue $5.6 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including fire alarm replacement, roofing, fencing, classroom modernization, technology upgrades, and construction of a science lab. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating an average of $360,500 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.513377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.032702", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10999, "fingerprint": "2024|202400626|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400626|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "8d47bd77477cb392", "measure_id": "202400626", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms and school facilities; replace leaky roofs; and make safety improvements at drop-off and pickup areas; shall the measure authorizing Washington Union School District to issue $18,200,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $1.08 million annually as long as bonds are outstanding at approximately $19 per $100,000 assessed value, be adopted, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2492, "no_votes": 2180, "total_votes": 4672, "percent_yes": 53.339041095890416, "percent_no": 46.660958904109584, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Washington Union School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Washington Union School District to issue $18.2 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom modernization, roof repairs, and safety enhancements at student drop-off areas. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $19 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.113947", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.517909", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.034994", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1700, "fingerprint": "2024|202400267|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400267|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a818f5376354411e", "measure_id": "202400267", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall City of Soledad Ordinance No. 765- Establishing and Implementing By-District Elections, by which all City council members shall be selected from newly established voting districts and the Mayor's position shall no longer be elected at-large by the public but rather, shall be selected from among the seated council members, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 204, "no_votes": 1673, "total_votes": 1877, "percent_yes": 10.868407032498668, "percent_no": 89.13159296750133, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would have changed Soledad's city council elections from at-la...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would have changed Soledad's city council elections from at-large to district-based voting and replaced the directly-elected mayor position with a mayor selected by council members from among themselves.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.405245", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.978032", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1709, "fingerprint": "2024|202400276|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400276|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d185dafd758b11cb", "measure_id": "202400276", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Chapter 23.45 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code be amended, in the form included in the voter information guide,\u00a0to add a definition of timeshare project that will henceforth be associated with the City\u2019s longstanding prohibition of timeshare projects; prohibit advertising and sale of any prohibited timeshare project; and other related changes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6022, "no_votes": 1688, "total_votes": 7710, "percent_yes": 78.10635538261998, "percent_no": 21.89364461738002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends Pacific Grove's municipal code to add a definition of \"tim...", "summary_text": "The measure amends Pacific Grove's municipal code to add a definition of \"timeshare project\" and prohibit the advertising and sale of such projects, reinforcing the city's existing ban on timeshares.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.408186", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.979464", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1701, "fingerprint": "2024|202400268|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400268|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "cd024d80339ba519", "measure_id": "202400268", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to protect city services including police and fire , parks, bicycle and pedestrian safety, roadways and storm drains, by increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax up to 4%, raising up to $60,000 in additional yearly revenue the State cannot take away, and taxing rent charged to \u201chotel\u201d guests, including by online travel and short-term rental companies, for transient occupancy, with annual independent audits, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 725, "no_votes": 224, "total_votes": 949, "percent_yes": 76.39620653319284, "percent_no": 23.60379346680716, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases Monterey's Transient Occupancy Tax up to 4% on hotel gu...", "summary_text": "The measure increases Monterey's Transient Occupancy Tax up to 4% on hotel guests and short-term rentals, generating approximately $60,000 annually for city services including police, fire, parks, and infrastructure. The tax includes annual independent audits and remains in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.405528", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.978182", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1702, "fingerprint": "2024|202400269|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400269|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b64b8c8aebda9668", "measure_id": "202400269", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure establishing a new Gonzales sales tax that increases the total tax rate from 1.0% to 1.5% used for general government purposes such as maintenance of infrastructure and improvements (Fire House, streets, roads and sidewalks, parks) adding $800,000 in revenues annually, collected on an ongoing basis until extinguished and requiring all funds to stay local with independent citizen\u2019s committee oversight and annual audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 933, "no_votes": 1158, "total_votes": 2091, "percent_yes": 44.61979913916787, "percent_no": 55.38020086083213, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.405840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.978345", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1703, "fingerprint": "2024|202400270|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400270|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "4d76c12c16db0b07", "measure_id": "202400270", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure increasing the City of King\u2019s local sales tax rate from one percent to one and one-half percent for general government uses (such as public safety, street improvements, park and facility maintenance, and emergency reserves), providing an annual increase of approximately $1,200,000 under local control with citizen oversight, annual audits, and expiration in 12 years, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 975, "no_votes": 1244, "total_votes": 2219, "percent_yes": 43.93871113114015, "percent_no": 56.06128886885985, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.406284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.978509", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1704, "fingerprint": "2024|202400271|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400271|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b4c1a3c27383a2a9", "measure_id": "202400271", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain rapid 911, fire, and emergency response times; ensure Marina\u2019s Fire/ Police Departments can respond to emergencies, maintain fire/police services, provide fire/police stations/community center, shall City of Marina\u2019s measure authorizing $50,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying on average $54.74 annually per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $3,191,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring public spending disclosure, all funds spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5450, "no_votes": 3634, "total_votes": 9084, "percent_yes": 59.99559665345663, "percent_no": 40.00440334654337, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.406587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.978671", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1705, "fingerprint": "2024|202400272|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400272|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "15d29f20a62240d4", "measure_id": "202400272", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to amend the City\u2019s Charter to delete obsolete provisions, resolve contradictions, update procedures for the adoption of ordinances, and clarify that the Library Board appoints or removes the Library Director, who is responsible for administering the Library Board\u2019s collections policy and appointing and removing other Library employees, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8707, "no_votes": 2656, "total_votes": 11363, "percent_yes": 76.6258910498988, "percent_no": 23.374108950101203, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Monterey's City Charter to remove outdated provisions, fi...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Monterey's City Charter to remove outdated provisions, fix contradictions, update ordinance adoption procedures, and clarify that the Library Board has authority to hire and fire the Library Director, who manages the library's collection policy and staff. The Charter Amendment passed in 2024.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.406962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.978834", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1706, "fingerprint": "2024|202400273|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400273|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "99fba1a0102b1699", "measure_id": "202400273", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to amend the City\u2019s Charter to specify that the term of office for a Councilmember filing for Mayor expires when their successor is appointed or 40 days after the election, whichever occurs first; remove the five extra days for the candidate filing period; and other clerical, non-substantive changes to sections regarding the Mayor and City Councilmembers, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8730, "no_votes": 2355, "total_votes": 11085, "percent_yes": 78.75507442489851, "percent_no": 21.24492557510149, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment specifies that a City Councilmember's term expires whe...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment specifies that a City Councilmember's term expires when their successor is appointed or 40 days after an election when they file to run for Mayor, whichever comes first. It also removes five extra days from the candidate filing period and makes other clerical changes to sections about the Mayor and City Councilmembers.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.407296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.978993", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1707, "fingerprint": "2024|202400274|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400274|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "88bcd71ecb897b50", "measure_id": "202400274", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to amend the City\u2019s Charter to provide that no person shall hold elective office for more than 12 years, whether held in the office of Mayor, City Councilmember, or combination of both offices, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9440, "no_votes": 2370, "total_votes": 11810, "percent_yes": 79.93226079593565, "percent_no": 20.067739204064353, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Monterey's City Charter to impose a 12-year limit on how ...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Monterey's City Charter to impose a 12-year limit on how long any person can serve in elected city office, whether as Mayor, City Councilmember, or a combination of both positions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.407581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.979150", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1708, "fingerprint": "2024|202400275|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400275|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "4efde80b57089982", "measure_id": "202400275", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to amend the City\u2019s Charter to allow the City to lease City real property to qualified nonprofit organizations, governmental entities, or educational institutions, on terms and rates that serve the community benefit, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9103, "no_votes": 2449, "total_votes": 11552, "percent_yes": 78.80020775623268, "percent_no": 21.19979224376732, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Contracting/Bidding/Leasing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Monterey's City Charter to allow the city to lease munici...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Monterey's City Charter to allow the city to lease municipal real property to qualified nonprofit organizations, governmental entities, or educational institutions at terms and rates designed to serve community benefit rather than market rates.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.407870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.979306", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1710, "fingerprint": "2024|202400277|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400277|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "afaa335fd3ede75d", "measure_id": "202400277", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Pacific Grove City Charter be amended to reduce the size of the City Council from six Councilmembers and a Mayor to four Councilmembers and a Mayor such that: in 2026 two Councilmembers shall be elected to four-year terms, and one to a single two-year term, and every two years thereafter two Councilmembers shall be elected to four-year terms; with associated amendments for votes needed for a quorum, majority vote and other select actions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3577, "no_votes": 4352, "total_votes": 7929, "percent_yes": 45.11287678143524, "percent_no": 54.88712321856476, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended Pacific Grove's city charter to reduce the ci...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended Pacific Grove's city charter to reduce the city council from six councilmembers plus a mayor to four councilmembers plus a mayor, with staggered four-year terms beginning in 2026 and corresponding adjustments to quorum and voting requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.408492", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.979625", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1729, "fingerprint": "2024|202400282|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400282|NAPA", "content_hash": "651ef78286cd8ec9", "measure_id": "202400282", "measure_letter": "A1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure A1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To enhance local control over funding essential City services and generate funds that must stay local, shall the City of St. Helena Charter be adopted to establish St. Helena as a chart the ability to adopt local funding measures subject to voter approval, such as an increased real property transfer tax that could fund needed infrastructure improvements and public sa throughout the City?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1191, "no_votes": 1528, "total_votes": 2719, "percent_yes": 43.80286870172858, "percent_no": 56.19713129827142, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have adopted a city charter for St", "summary_text": "The measure would have adopted a city charter for St. Helena allowing the city to implement local funding measures subject to voter approval, including an increased real property transfer tax to fund infrastructure improvements and public safety services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.410158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.980393", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure A1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11000, "fingerprint": "2024|202400283|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400283|NAPA", "content_hash": "5ccb553dbba4a6ab", "measure_id": "202400283", "measure_letter": "A2", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure A2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund essential City services including repairing local streets/potholes, downtown sidewalks/infrastructure, maintaining emergency/fire response/evacuation routes, for general gov shall St. Helena adopt a measure establishing a graduated real property transfer tax ranging from 1.5%- 3% of purchase price on sales over $1,000,000 to be paid only by property b1 generating approximately $5,300,000 annually until ended by voters, all funds staying in St. Helena/cannot be taken by the state, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1123, "no_votes": 1618, "total_votes": 2741, "percent_yes": 40.97044874133528, "percent_no": 59.02955125866472, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.114890", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.410461", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.980545", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure A2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11001, "fingerprint": "2024|202400629|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400629|NAPA", "content_hash": "c723a9fac571fa55", "measure_id": "202400629", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide safe, modern schools for all Napa students by upgrading aging classrooms; repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; removing asbestos/ hazardous materials; and modernizing science, math, technology, engineering, career technical education/ skilled trades labs, shall Napa Valley Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District #1\u2019s measure authorizing $230,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $22/ $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding (averaging $24,700,000 annually that cannot be taken by the State) with citizen oversight, annual audits, and no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23284, "no_votes": 18983, "total_votes": 42267, "percent_yes": 55.08789362859914, "percent_no": 44.91210637140086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Napa Valley Unified School District to issue $230...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Napa Valley Unified School District to issue $230 million in bonds to upgrade school facilities, including classroom improvements, infrastructure repairs, asbestos removal, and modernization of science and technical education labs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $22 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.115730", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.518771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.035482", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1730, "fingerprint": "2024|202400284|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400284|NAPA", "content_hash": "7ccc7d1ada8d6b01", "measure_id": "202400284", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure to amend the St. Helena General Plan 2040, the St. Helena Zoning Map, and the St. Helena Municipal Code to create a Winery and Planned Agritrourism Overlay to allow resort hotel development on certain large winery property within the City, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1366, "no_votes": 1398, "total_votes": 2764, "percent_yes": 49.421128798842254, "percent_no": 50.578871201157746, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.410765", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.980698", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1731, "fingerprint": "2024|202400628|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400628|NAPA", "content_hash": "0f422f46397a9998", "measure_id": "202400628", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct an early learning center to support transitional kindergarten, upgrade technology,renovate/replace roofs, windows, flooring, cabinetry, HVAC systems and music building, and improve playfields and paved surfaces, shall the Howell Mountain Elementary School District measure authorizing $9,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $531,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with an appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 367, "no_votes": 374, "total_votes": 741, "percent_yes": 49.527665317139004, "percent_no": 50.472334682860996, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Howell Mountain Elementary School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Howell Mountain Elementary School District to issue $9 million in bonds to construct an early learning center, upgrade technology and building systems, renovate the music building, and improve outdoor facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising about $531,000 annually until the bonds were paid off.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.518480", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.035320", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1728, "fingerprint": "2024|202400281|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400281|NAPA", "content_hash": "16e1341f5ec0d1bf", "measure_id": "202400281", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect/maintain funding (that The State of California cannot take) for City of Napa services including: repairing potholes/ streets; maintaining parks, recreation, senior/ youth programs; protecting water quality; supporting police with mental health response team for nonviolent calls; upgrading fire stations with lifesaving equipment; homeless encampment cleanups; constructing essential facilities; enhancing fire protection; general government use; shall the City of Napa measure be adopted levying a 1\u00a2 sales tax, raising $22,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, including independent audits/citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19961, "no_votes": 14763, "total_votes": 34724, "percent_yes": 57.484736781476784, "percent_no": 42.515263218523216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies a 1-cent sales tax in the City of Napa to raise approxima...", "summary_text": "This measure levies a 1-cent sales tax in the City of Napa to raise approximately $22 million annually for various city services including street repairs, parks and recreation programs, police and fire services, homeless services, and general government operations. The tax would continue until ended by voters and includes provisions for independent audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.409708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.980230", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1727, "fingerprint": "2024|202400280|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400280|NAPA", "content_hash": "4b9a8cac933b97fe", "measure_id": "202400280", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fully utilize TOT and sales tax generated from visitors for public services, parks & recreation, police and fire emergency programs, shall the appropriations limit set by Article 13B of the California Constitutionbe increased by $3,000,000 and the growth in TOT for each year commencing fiscal year 2022/2023 through fiscal year 2026/2027? By approving this appropriation limit, no new taxes are created nor will any existing tax be increased.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 793, "no_votes": 132, "total_votes": 925, "percent_yes": 85.72972972972973, "percent_no": 14.270270270270274, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Napa's appropriations limit under California's constit...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Napa's appropriations limit under California's constitutional spending cap by $3,000,000 and allows for growth in transient occupancy tax (TOT) from fiscal years 2022/2023 through 2026/2027. The increase would enable the city to spend more of its existing TOT and sales tax revenue from visitors on public services, parks, recreation, police, and fire programs without raising taxes or creating new ones.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.409370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.980082", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1736, "fingerprint": "2024|202400630|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400630|NEVADA", "content_hash": "902535f67b59bd9a", "measure_id": "202400630", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NEVADA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To make basic repairs and upgrades to classrooms and facilities, replace outdated HVAC systems, ensure ADA access, improve safety and security, and build new kindergarten and pre-K classrooms; shall Twin Ridges Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $2,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating an estimated average $190,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, all funds staying local and NO money for administrators\u2019 salaries, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 643, "no_votes": 249, "total_votes": 892, "percent_yes": 72.08520179372198, "percent_no": 27.91479820627802, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Twin Ridges Elementary School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Twin Ridges Elementary School District to issue $2,600,000 in bonds to fund facility repairs, HVAC system replacements, ADA accessibility improvements, safety upgrades, and construction of new kindergarten and pre-K classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating an estimated $190,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.519057", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.035645", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEVADA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1733, "fingerprint": "2024|202400285|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400285|NEVADA", "content_hash": "19c2ad7d60b7b28e", "measure_id": "202400285", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NEVADA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure for general governmental uses such as reducing the risk of catastrophic wildfire and extreme weather by funding additional firefighters, vegetation management, and emergency evacuation planning by adopting a general, 3/8-cent (0.375%) sales tax raising about $3.4 million yearly, with yearly audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, effective for 7 years unless voters end it sooner, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2137, "no_votes": 2117, "total_votes": 4254, "percent_yes": 50.2350728725905, "percent_no": 49.7649271274095, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopts a 0", "summary_text": "This measure adopts a 0.375% sales tax for seven years to fund firefighters, vegetation management, and emergency evacuation planning, raising approximately $3.4 million annually with yearly audits and citizen oversight. The tax is intended for general governmental uses focused on wildfire risk reduction and extreme weather preparedness.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.411046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.980848", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEVADA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1734, "fingerprint": "2024|202400286|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400286|NEVADA", "content_hash": "b8c8a90ba117883a", "measure_id": "202400286", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NEVADA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Exclusively to fund a locally controlled Wildfire Prevention and Mitigation Program that includes the reduction of flammable vegetation throughout Nevada City; the improvement and maintenance of emergency communications/early warning system, evacuation routes, and temporary refuge areas; the implementation of community oriented defensible space practices; and other activities and services; shall the measure adding a 0.5% Nevada City sales tax, providing approximately $900,000 annually over a five year period, monitored by a Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 937, "no_votes": 417, "total_votes": 1354, "percent_yes": 69.20236336779911, "percent_no": 30.79763663220089, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adds a 0", "summary_text": "This measure adds a 0.5% sales tax in Nevada City, California to fund wildfire prevention and mitigation activities including vegetation reduction, emergency communications improvements, evacuation route maintenance, and defensible space practices. The tax is expected to generate approximately $900,000 annually over five years and will be overseen by a citizen oversight committee.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.411359", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.981011", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEVADA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1737, "fingerprint": "2024|202400631|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400631|NEVADA", "content_hash": "23e99d74771d83b1", "measure_id": "202400631", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NEVADA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local elementary/middle schools, replace leaky roofs, update heating and cooling systems, upgrade kitchens, reconfigure school entrances and exits to improve student safety and provide emergency evacuation centers, shall Pleasant Ridge Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $25,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value, generating on average $1,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with strict accountability, independent citizen oversight, audits and no funds used for administrator salaries or pensions be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6641, "no_votes": 5839, "total_votes": 12480, "percent_yes": 53.21314102564103, "percent_no": 46.78685897435897, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Pleasant Ridge Union Elementary School...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Pleasant Ridge Union Elementary School District to issue $25 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, HVAC updates, kitchen upgrades, and safety modifications at local elementary and middle schools. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.519338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.035818", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEVADA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1735, "fingerprint": "2024|202400287|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400287|NEVADA", "content_hash": "08db30931db9072f", "measure_id": "202400287", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NEVADA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect essential services such as keeping public areas, facilities, and parkways safe, clean and well maintained; protecting creeks and waterways from pollution; preparing for wildfires and natural disasters; expanding transit services like TART Connect; and for general government use, shall the Town of Truckee measure be adopted establishing a 1\u20442% sales tax, providing approximately $3,500,000 annually for 15 years, with independent audits and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5600, "no_votes": 3592, "total_votes": 9192, "percent_yes": 60.92254134029591, "percent_no": 39.07745865970409, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.5% sales tax in the Town of Truckee for 15 years, generating approximately $3.5 million annually to fund public facility maintenance, environmental protection, emergency preparedness, transit services, and general government operations. The measure includes provisions for independent audits and local control of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.411672", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.981174", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEVADA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1732, "fingerprint": "2024|202400058|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400058|NEVADA", "content_hash": "7d421868c192727a", "measure_id": "202400058", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NEVADA Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to fund continued necessary road and culvert maintenance by the BLCSD replace the current tax assessment with an annual assessment tax of $300 per parcel per year to raise $19,200 per year, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57, "no_votes": 16, "total_votes": 73, "percent_yes": 78.08219178082192, "percent_no": 21.917808219178085, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure replaces the current tax assessment in Nevada, California with a...", "summary_text": "This measure replaces the current tax assessment in Nevada, California with a $300 annual assessment per parcel to raise $19,200 yearly for road and culvert maintenance by the BLCSD. The assessment would fund ongoing infrastructure maintenance needs in the district.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.331899", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.944508", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEVADA Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1738, "fingerprint": "2024|202400288|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400288|ORANGE", "content_hash": "40ca2cce8886b27d", "measure_id": "202400288", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall proposed Charter Amendment No. 1, which provides that commencing in 2026, for all municipal elections, the City:may require Voter Identification for elections; provide more in-person voting locations; and monitor ballot drop-boxes,be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32892, "no_votes": 28701, "total_votes": 61593, "percent_yes": 53.40217232477716, "percent_no": 46.59782767522284, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment allows the City of Orange to require voter identificat...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment allows the City of Orange to require voter identification for municipal elections starting in 2026, provide additional in-person voting locations, and monitor ballot drop-boxes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.411975", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.981335", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1751, "fingerprint": "2024|202400302|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400302|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f6a8be45be1605c6", "measure_id": "202400302", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 10-24 be approved by the voters to amend Chapter 8.13 of the Orange Municipal Code to permit the sale, possession, and use of safe and sane fireworks in areas of the City of Orange that are not high risk fire areas?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35468, "no_votes": 22503, "total_votes": 57971, "percent_yes": 61.182315295578825, "percent_no": 38.817684704421175, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends Orange's municipal code to allow the sale, possession, and...", "summary_text": "The measure amends Orange's municipal code to allow the sale, possession, and use of safe and sane fireworks in areas of the city that are not designated as high fire risk zones. It passed with 60.6% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.416181", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.983506", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1739, "fingerprint": "2024|202400289|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400289|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2eacd59693989566", "measure_id": "202400289", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall proposed Charter Amendment No. 2, which provides that the only flags to be displayed by the City on City property are the United States Flag, the State of California Flag, the County of Orange Flag, the City of Huntington Beach Flag, the POW-MIA Flag, the six Armed Forces Flags, the Olympic Flag during the Summer Olympic Games, and any other flag if authorized by a unanimous vote of the City Council, be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35231, "no_votes": 26358, "total_votes": 61589, "percent_yes": 57.203396710451536, "percent_no": 42.796603289548464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.412296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.981484", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1753, "fingerprint": "2024|202400304|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400304|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f93715c31927948c", "measure_id": "202400304", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure restoring/keeping sand on the beach, maintaining beach access for residents, reducing beach erosion; protecting ocean water quality, surfing/ocean swimming locations; restoring/maintaining beach trail, pier and lifeguard lifesaving equipment, helping protect San Clemente\u2019s local beach economy, by establishing a dedicated 1/2\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $6,750,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring public spending disclosure, independent audits, all funds used locally and cannot be taken for other purposes, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24004, "no_votes": 13145, "total_votes": 37149, "percent_yes": 64.61546744192307, "percent_no": 35.38453255807693, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Parks & Recreation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.416813", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.983827", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1740, "fingerprint": "2024|202400290|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400290|ORANGE", "content_hash": "779a589b5a943e3b", "measure_id": "202400290", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall proposed Charter Amendment No. 3 to: commencing in 2026, require the City to adopt a two-year budget; update the procedures to cancel a regular City Council meeting; update the process to fill a City Council vacancy; and amend outdated phrases, syntax, dates, pronouns, and titles be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28314, "no_votes": 32157, "total_votes": 60471, "percent_yes": 46.82244381604405, "percent_no": 53.17755618395595, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment would have required Orange to adopt two-year budgets s...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment would have required Orange to adopt two-year budgets starting in 2026, updated procedures for canceling City Council meetings and filling council vacancies, and modernized outdated language in the city charter.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.412591", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.981636", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1754, "fingerprint": "2024|202400305|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400305|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8243ae3e01f94748", "measure_id": "202400305", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure adopting a Rent Stabilization and Just Cause Eviction Ordinance be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43134, "no_votes": 31713, "total_votes": 74847, "percent_yes": 57.629564311194834, "percent_no": 42.370435688805166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Rent Control", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopts a rent stabilization ordinance that limits rent increases...", "summary_text": "This measure adopts a rent stabilization ordinance that limits rent increases and establishes just cause requirements for tenant evictions in Orange, California. The ordinance passed with 50.6% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.417088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.983994", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1741, "fingerprint": "2024|202400291|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400291|ORANGE", "content_hash": "bac34c359acdea53", "measure_id": "202400291", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a City Charter amendment that (i) increases the membership of the City Council from five to seven, with the new membership comprised of a mayor and six Council members, and (ii) provides for the transition from at-large elections to by-district elections for the six Council members, with the district boundaries as described in City Council ResolutionNo. 23-88, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30790, "no_votes": 20696, "total_votes": 51486, "percent_yes": 59.80266480208212, "percent_no": 40.19733519791788, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment increases Orange's City Council from five to seven mem...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment increases Orange's City Council from five to seven members (a mayor plus six council members) and transitions council member elections from at-large to district-based elections using boundaries established in City Council Resolution No. 23-88.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.412861", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.981787", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1755, "fingerprint": "2024|202400306|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400306|ORANGE", "content_hash": "67bf143f1a391301", "measure_id": "202400306", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure DD", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Santa Ana City Charter be amended to allow, by the November 2028 general municipal election, noncitizen City residents to vote in all City of Santa Ana municipal elections?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30799, "no_votes": 44378, "total_votes": 75177, "percent_yes": 40.96864732564482, "percent_no": 59.03135267435518, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.417353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.984146", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure DD", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1742, "fingerprint": "2024|202400292|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400292|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6f3431c1817222c1", "measure_id": "202400292", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To sustain Westminster\u2019s long-term financial stability, restore/prevent future cuts to services including 911 emergency response, police, neighborhood patrols, drug/gang/domestic violence/human trafficking units, firefighters, paramedics;keep parks/public areas safe/clean; address homelessness; protect local drinking water supplies; retain local businesses,shall an ordinance establishing a \u00bd\u00a2 (\u00bd%) sales tax, until ended by voters, providing an estimated $8,000,000 annuallyfor general government use, requiring audits, spending disclosure, funds controlled locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10074, "no_votes": 6276, "total_votes": 16350, "percent_yes": 61.61467889908256, "percent_no": 38.38532110091744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.5% sales tax in Westminster to generate approximately $8 million annually for general government services including emergency response, police, fire, parks maintenance, and homelessness programs. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters and includes requirements for audits and spending disclosure.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.413176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.981935", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1756, "fingerprint": "2024|202400307|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400307|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8463a127b1903e7c", "measure_id": "202400307", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure EE", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Charter of the City of Santa Ana be amended to delete references to obsolete job titles and obsolete bonding requirements, specify that all department heads are at-will employees, address definitions of funds and levies for compliance with state law, authorize limited purchasing authority for the City Clerk and City Attorney and require the City Council to adopt an ordinance to enforce the Ethics Code?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53781, "no_votes": 19061, "total_votes": 72842, "percent_yes": 73.83240438208726, "percent_no": 26.16759561791274, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment updated the City of Santa Ana's charter by removing ou...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment updated the City of Santa Ana's charter by removing outdated job titles and bonding requirements, clarifying that department heads serve at-will, updating financial definitions for state law compliance, granting limited purchasing authority to the City Clerk and City Attorney, and requiring the City Council to adopt an ordinance enforcing the Ethics Code.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.417651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.984295", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure EE", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1757, "fingerprint": "2024|202400308|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400308|ORANGE", "content_hash": "90b692d9d07b7b31", "measure_id": "202400308", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure FF", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Charter of the City of Santa Ana be amended to index Council compensation at a salary of thirty three (33%) percent of that of an Orange County Superior Court Judge?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25041, "no_votes": 47880, "total_votes": 72921, "percent_yes": 34.3399020858189, "percent_no": 65.66009791418111, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.417944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.984449", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure FF", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1770, "fingerprint": "2024|202400641|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400641|ORANGE", "content_hash": "eb9db43b2aa72f32", "measure_id": "202400641", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade classrooms/labs preparing students/veterans for university transfer, jobs including nursing, emergency response, building trades; repair leaky roofs, deteriorating gas, sewer lines; provide clean drinking water; improve safety/security; acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment; shall Rancho Santiago Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $720,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating $46,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring oversight, public spending disclosure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91403, "no_votes": 87719, "total_votes": 179122, "percent_yes": 51.02834939315104, "percent_no": 48.97165060684896, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Rancho Santiago Community College Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Rancho Santiago Community College District to issue $720 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms and labs, repair infrastructure including roofs and utility lines, improve safety and security, and construct or repair facilities and equipment. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $46 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.522428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.037415", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1758, "fingerprint": "2024|202400309|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400309|ORANGE", "content_hash": "37fefd1ae0da92c2", "measure_id": "202400309", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure GG", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure funding City of Seal Beach general services such as maintaining 911 medical emergency/police/ fire response, helping prevent property crimes/retail thefts; keeping public areas/beaches safe/clean; helping protect local water quality; reducing risk of flooding; retaining/supporting local businesses; addressing homelessness; repairing streets/potholes; by establishing a \u00bd\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $3,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, public spending disclosure, all funds spent for Seal Beach, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10689, "no_votes": 4973, "total_votes": 15662, "percent_yes": 68.24798876261013, "percent_no": 31.752011237389866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a half-cent sales tax in Seal Beach to generate appr...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a half-cent sales tax in Seal Beach to generate approximately $3 million annually for general city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and various municipal operations. The tax continues until voters decide to end it and includes requirements for audits and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.418218", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.984597", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure GG", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1764, "fingerprint": "2024|202400635|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400635|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fb2d131918d24661", "measure_id": "202400635", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade/ repair 108-year-old Brea Junior High/ aging neighborhood schools, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, remove asbestos/ lead, modernize/ construct classrooms, science labs, career technology facilities for current academic/ health/ safety standards, improve access for students with disabilities, shall Brea Olinda Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $160,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $39/ $100,000 assessed value ($10,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12942, "no_votes": 7107, "total_votes": 20049, "percent_yes": 64.55184797246746, "percent_no": 35.448152027532544, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Brea Olinda Unified School District to issue $160...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Brea Olinda Unified School District to issue $160 million in bonds to upgrade and repair aging school facilities, including fixing deteriorating infrastructure, removing hazardous materials, modernizing classrooms and labs, and improving disability access. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $39 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $10 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.520551", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.036434", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1759, "fingerprint": "2024|202400310|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400310|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3e231e67e06bf886", "measure_id": "202400310", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure HH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Stanton adopt a measure establishing a two-full-term lifetime limit on service as Mayor, starting with the November 5, 2024 General Municipal Election?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7048, "no_votes": 3533, "total_votes": 10581, "percent_yes": 66.6099612512995, "percent_no": 33.390038748700505, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a two-term lifetime limit for mayors in the City of S...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a two-term lifetime limit for mayors in the City of Stanton, beginning with the November 5, 2024 election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.418483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.984759", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure HH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1771, "fingerprint": "2024|202400642|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400642|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b4d36e2ead806fe3", "measure_id": "202400642", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ upgrade classrooms, science labs, school facilities, and instructional technology for college/ career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts, and skilled trades; make health/ safety upgrades; remove asbestos/ lead; and fix roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, shall Santa Ana Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $355,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($23,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40336, "no_votes": 18203, "total_votes": 58539, "percent_yes": 68.90449102307863, "percent_no": 31.095508976921366, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Santa Ana Unified School District to issue $355 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Santa Ana Unified School District to issue $355 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, science labs, technology, and infrastructure systems like roofs and plumbing. The bonds would be funded through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed property value, generating approximately $23 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.522710", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.037576", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1760, "fingerprint": "2024|202400311|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400311|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4c50e030528c468d", "measure_id": "202400311", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure II", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance revising the limitation on consecutive terms of office for the Mayor and Members of the City Council be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15420, "no_votes": 13165, "total_votes": 28585, "percent_yes": 53.944376421199934, "percent_no": 46.055623578800066, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance revises the existing term limits for Orange's Mayor and City Co...", "summary_text": "The ordinance revises the existing term limits for Orange's Mayor and City Council members, though the specific changes to consecutive term restrictions are not detailed in the ballot language.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.418776", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.984908", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure II", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1772, "fingerprint": "2024|202400643|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400643|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d4e9b1df7e83c8fe", "measure_id": "202400643", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms, science labs, school and career-training facilities supporting college/career readiness in math, science, technology/skilled trades; fix roofs, plumbing, and electrical; improve school safety/security; remove asbestos/lead; shall Tustin Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $261,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (raising $18,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39075, "no_votes": 19357, "total_votes": 58432, "percent_yes": 66.87260405257393, "percent_no": 33.127395947426066, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Tustin Unified School District to issue $261 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Tustin Unified School District to issue $261 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, labs, roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $18 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.522991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.037743", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1761, "fingerprint": "2024|202400312|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400312|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c55ad21588b86202", "measure_id": "202400312", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure JJ", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain local control over land use decisions; protect open space, single-family residential neighborhood character, height limits; limit traffic; shall Yorba Linda retain voter-approved development restrictions, adopt land use plans developed by residents including mixed-use housing, retaining/attracting businesses at Savi Ranch; limiting new housing density in areas including Richfield/Christmas Tree Farm and Buena Vista, vacant land at Fairmont/Quarter Horse Drive; requiring developer fees supporting parks/schools and public oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34718, "no_votes": 3686, "total_votes": 38404, "percent_yes": 90.4020414540152, "percent_no": 9.597958545984795, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure maintains existing voter-approved development restrictions in Yo...", "summary_text": "This measure maintains existing voter-approved development restrictions in Yorba Linda while adopting resident-developed land use plans that include mixed-use housing at Savi Ranch and limit housing density in specific areas including Richfield/Christmas Tree Farm and Buena Vista. It also requires developer fees to support parks and schools along with public oversight of development projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.419108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.985058", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure JJ", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1763, "fingerprint": "2024|202400634|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400634|ORANGE", "content_hash": "034c98c7e90217db", "measure_id": "202400634", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade older local schools and improve quality education; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; remove asbestos/ lead pipes; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, science labs, facilities, career technology, sites, equipment; support college/ career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts, skilled trades, shall Anaheim Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $496,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2/ $100 assessed value ($33,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82881, "no_votes": 40928, "total_votes": 123809, "percent_yes": 66.94262937266274, "percent_no": 33.057370627337264, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Anaheim Union High School District to issue $496 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Anaheim Union High School District to issue $496 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including fixing roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, removing hazardous materials, and constructing new classrooms and labs. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $33 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.520229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.036273", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1762, "fingerprint": "2024|202400313|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400313|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f26def63e8a40ed3", "measure_id": "202400313", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure KK", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative be adopted that amends the Yorba Linda Municipal Code, General Plan Land Use Element, Housing Element, and Housing Element appendices to allow high density residential housing and mixed-use development on the 9.15 acre site occupied by the Bryant Ranch Shopping Center at 23621-23741 La Palma Avenue?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6868, "no_votes": 31159, "total_votes": 38027, "percent_yes": 18.06085150024982, "percent_no": 81.93914849975017, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.419379", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.985212", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure KK", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1767, "fingerprint": "2024|202400638|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400638|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9cd064eb5e598490", "measure_id": "202400638", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms, labs, career technology and facilities at high schools serving Fullerton, Buena Park, and La Habra to support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, and skilled trades and fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewer, and electrical systems, shall Fullerton Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure authorizing $284,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $21 per $100,000 assessed value ($18,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51561, "no_votes": 36829, "total_votes": 88390, "percent_yes": 58.333521891616705, "percent_no": 41.666478108383295, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Fullerton Joint Union High School District to issu...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Fullerton Joint Union High School District to issue $284 million in bonds to repair and upgrade aging facilities including classrooms, labs, career technology areas, and infrastructure systems like roofs, plumbing, and electrical at high schools serving Fullerton, Buena Park, and La Habra. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $21 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $18 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.521476", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.036923", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1765, "fingerprint": "2024|202400636|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400636|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0e3713efb40cd55f", "measure_id": "202400636", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "In order to repair and improve classrooms, labs, school facilities and instructional technology to support student achievement in math, science, technology, arts and engineering; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, ventilation and electrical; and improve school safety and security systems, shall Buena Park School District\u2019s measure authorizing $84,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, be adopted, levying approximately 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value (averaging $6,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10240, "no_votes": 4922, "total_votes": 15162, "percent_yes": 67.53726421316449, "percent_no": 32.46273578683551, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Buena Park School District to issue $84 million i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Buena Park School District to issue $84 million in bonds to repair and improve school facilities, including classrooms, labs, technology infrastructure, building systems, and safety features. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.520836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.036595", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1766, "fingerprint": "2024|202400637|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400637|ORANGE", "content_hash": "96babef3338c6889", "measure_id": "202400637", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair aging classrooms, labs and facilities at Fullerton elementary/middle schools to support student achievement in math, science, technology, arts and engineering; remove asbestos/lead pipes; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewer, electrical; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment; shall Fullerton School District\u2019s measure authorizing $262,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $30 per $100,000 assessed value ($15,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29859, "no_votes": 18971, "total_votes": 48830, "percent_yes": 61.1488838828589, "percent_no": 38.8511161171411, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Fullerton School District to issue $262 million i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Fullerton School District to issue $262 million in bonds to repair and upgrade elementary and middle school facilities, including removing hazardous materials, fixing infrastructure systems, and constructing new classrooms and facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $15 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.521159", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.036761", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1768, "fingerprint": "2024|202400639|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400639|ORANGE", "content_hash": "164deadece902242", "measure_id": "202400639", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide safe, modern neighborhood schools; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, and infrastructure; upgrade classrooms and science labs to support student achievement in math, science, technology, arts, and engineering; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, equipment, sites/ facilities; shall La Habra City School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $73,000,000 in bonds at legal rates without increasing current tax rates, levying $25 per $100,000 assessed value ($5,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12085, "no_votes": 6363, "total_votes": 18448, "percent_yes": 65.50845620121423, "percent_no": 34.49154379878577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the La Habra City School District to issue $73 millio...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the La Habra City School District to issue $73 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including fixing infrastructure, modernizing classrooms and science labs, and constructing new facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of $25 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.521759", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.037088", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1769, "fingerprint": "2024|202400640|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400640|ORANGE", "content_hash": "be2a29a6345ed69b", "measure_id": "202400640", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide safe, modern elementary/intermediate schools; construct, repair/update classrooms, science labs/school facilities to support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, arts/engineering; improve disabled student access; replace deteriorating portables with permanent classrooms; shall Lowell Joint School District\u2019s measure authorizing $54,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $4,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, annual audits, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3873, "no_votes": 2426, "total_votes": 6299, "percent_yes": 61.485950150817594, "percent_no": 38.514049849182406, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Lowell Joint School District to issue $54 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Lowell Joint School District to issue $54 million in bonds to construct, repair, and update school facilities including classrooms, science labs, and accessibility improvements, while replacing portable classrooms with permanent structures. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising about $4 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.522121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.037249", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11002, "fingerprint": "2024|202400294|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400294|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2b9c1b2458cc35b4", "measure_id": "202400294", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain Buena Park\u2019s quality of life/ essential services, such as 911 response, preventing crime including property crimes; keeping public areas safe/ clean; protecting local drinking water; fire protection/ prevention; providing safe places to play; retaining/ attracting police officers; repairing streets/ potholes; shall a measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax, providing approximately $20,000,000 annually for general revenue purposes, until ended by voters, with local control/ spending disclosure, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21806, "no_votes": 7380, "total_votes": 29186, "percent_yes": 74.71390392654013, "percent_no": 25.286096073459873, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Buena Park to generate approxi...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Buena Park to generate approximately $20 million annually for general city services including public safety, street repairs, and other municipal operations. The tax continues indefinitely until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.118161", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.413792", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.982250", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11003, "fingerprint": "2024|202400632|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400632|ORANGE", "content_hash": "209c973bf3f5945b", "measure_id": "202400632", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure R1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Madison Miner be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member, Orange Unified School District, Trustee Area 4?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27674, "no_votes": 24113, "total_votes": 51787, "percent_yes": 53.43812153629289, "percent_no": 46.56187846370711, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Madison Miner from her pos...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Madison Miner from her position as a Governing Board Member for Trustee Area 4 of the Orange Unified School District. The recall was successful, removing Miner from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.121969", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.519608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.035979", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure R1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1743, "fingerprint": "2024|202400293|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400293|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1991c96f0acbd0e8", "measure_id": "202400293", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure R1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Natalie Rubalcava be recalled (removed) from the Office of Council Member for District 3 of the City of Anaheim?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2775, "no_votes": 3240, "total_votes": 6015, "percent_yes": 46.13466334164589, "percent_no": 53.86533665835411, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-06-04", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.413490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.982101", "update_count": 7, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure R1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11004, "fingerprint": "2024|202400633|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400633|ORANGE", "content_hash": "5984f533f1d1fed8", "measure_id": "202400633", "measure_letter": "R2", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure R2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Rick Ledesma be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member, Orange Unified School District, Trustee Area 7?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27782, "no_votes": 23888, "total_votes": 51670, "percent_yes": 53.768143990710286, "percent_no": 46.231856009289714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Rick Ledesma from his posi...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Rick Ledesma from his position as a Governing Board Member representing Trustee Area 7 on the Orange Unified School District board. The recall passed, meaning Ledesma was removed from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.122155", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.519881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.036126", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure R2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1744, "fingerprint": "2024|202400295|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400295|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b15fc7e232e6cfb3", "measure_id": "202400295", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To address the rising cost of living and high cost of housing (without raising taxes); retain/attract small businesses; maintain local control; meet state housing requirements; provide for housing needs of workers, seniors, and middle-class families, shall the City of Cypress measure to approve an ordinance amending the Cypress Town Center and Commons Specific Plan to allow the right to develop 676 additional housing units, over time, at the Los Alamitos Race Course instead of allowing 766 housing units elsewhere in Cypress, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13334, "no_votes": 9336, "total_votes": 22670, "percent_yes": 58.817820908689896, "percent_no": 41.182179091310104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure approves an ordinance allowing the development of 676 housing un...", "summary_text": "This measure approves an ordinance allowing the development of 676 housing units at the Los Alamitos Race Course site instead of permitting 766 housing units in other locations throughout Cypress. The change amends the Cypress Town Center and Commons Specific Plan to relocate where housing development can occur within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.414097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.982414", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1745, "fingerprint": "2024|202400296|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400296|ORANGE", "content_hash": "73e9f8ed36715412", "measure_id": "202400296", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall \u201cAn Initiative to Repeal and Replace the City\u2019s Existing Short Term Rental Ordinance\u201d be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6664, "no_votes": 11839, "total_votes": 18503, "percent_yes": 36.01578122466627, "percent_no": 63.98421877533373, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Housing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.414366", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.982568", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1746, "fingerprint": "2024|202400297|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400297|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a033256435846e59", "measure_id": "202400297", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall proposed Charter Amendment No. 1, which would amend the City Charter to state that City Planning and Zoning is a local, municipal affair, and require voter approval of City initiated general plan amendments or zoning changes when such items present significant and unavoidable negative impacts to the environment, be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56306, "no_votes": 41295, "total_votes": 97601, "percent_yes": 57.68998268460365, "percent_no": 42.31001731539635, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment designates city planning and zoning as a local municip...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment designates city planning and zoning as a local municipal affair and requires voter approval for city-initiated general plan amendments or zoning changes that present significant and unavoidable negative environmental impacts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.414661", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.982719", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1747, "fingerprint": "2024|202400298|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400298|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1c96e808e55490a9", "measure_id": "202400298", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To help prevent additional cuts to firefighter/paramedic 911 response services; police staffing/ ambulance services; maintain street repairs; protect groundwater supplies, parks/open space; address homelessness; remove hazardous waste; gang prevention; and general City services, shall an ordinance reauthorizing La Habra\u2019s existing local sales tax at an updated 1\u00a2 rate be adopted, providing approximately $15,600,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, public spending disclosure, all funds local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15876, "no_votes": 7158, "total_votes": 23034, "percent_yes": 68.92419901015889, "percent_no": 31.075800989841113, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reauthorized La Habra's existing local sales tax at an updated r...", "summary_text": "This measure reauthorized La Habra's existing local sales tax at an updated rate of 1 cent, generating approximately $15.6 million annually for city services including fire, police, street repairs, parks, homelessness programs, and other general municipal services. The measure passed with 50.7% of the vote and includes requirements for audits and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.414966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.982870", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1748, "fingerprint": "2024|202400299|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400299|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2a10d2b7e43e1437", "measure_id": "202400299", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To expand the ability of La Palma voters to choose who is elected to city council; provide the opportunity for more consistent community leadership; and broaden the candidate pool for newly created district elections; shall voters limit city council members to three consecutive terms in office with a mandatory four year out of office period, which will expire if council elections return to at-large elections?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4022, "no_votes": 2874, "total_votes": 6896, "percent_yes": 58.32366589327146, "percent_no": 41.67633410672854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure limits La Palma city council members to three consecutive terms ...", "summary_text": "This measure limits La Palma city council members to three consecutive terms with a mandatory four-year break from office before they can run again. The term limits would automatically expire if the city returns to at-large elections from its current district-based election system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.415232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.983030", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1749, "fingerprint": "2024|202400300|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400300|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a39a04b948668740", "measure_id": "202400300", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Los Alamitos City Charter (established in 1966) be amended with no tax increase to: reflect the City\u2019s by-district election system; establish term limits for Councilmembers elected-by district; impose limits on campaign contributions; require lobbyists to register with the City and report all lobbying activities, with reports made available to the public; and increase the bidding threshold for public works contracts awarded by the City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3416, "no_votes": 2018, "total_votes": 5434, "percent_yes": 62.86345233713655, "percent_no": 37.13654766286345, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment updates Los Alamitos City's governance structure to re...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment updates Los Alamitos City's governance structure to reflect district-based elections, establishes term limits for city council members, imposes campaign contribution limits, and requires lobbyist registration and public reporting. It also increases the bidding threshold for public works contracts awarded by the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.415575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.983180", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1750, "fingerprint": "2024|202400301|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400301|ORANGE", "content_hash": "bf00cc7598e81e69", "measure_id": "202400301", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall City of Mission Viejo\u2019s ordinance be adopted to provide funding for police, crime prevention, emergency response and maintenance of city infrastructure assets, including streets, sidewalks, storm drains, parks and trails, increase the transient occupancy tax paid only by hotel/motel/short-term rental guests from 8% to 12% providing an estimated $670,000 annually until ended by voters, with requiring public spending disclosure, independent audits, to be effective only upon approval of two-thirds of the voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23454, "no_votes": 26959, "total_votes": 50413, "percent_yes": 46.523714121357585, "percent_no": 53.476285878642415, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased Mission Viejo's transient occupancy tax on ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased Mission Viejo's transient occupancy tax on hotel, motel, and short-term rental guests from 8% to 12% to fund police services, emergency response, and infrastructure maintenance. The measure required a two-thirds voter approval threshold and would have generated an estimated $670,000 annually with provisions for public spending disclosure and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.415883", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.983345", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1752, "fingerprint": "2024|202400303|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400303|ORANGE", "content_hash": "83a714c4049b865b", "measure_id": "202400303", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure providing funding for City of Orange\u2019s general government use such as maintaining 911 response, fire/ police protection/paramedic services; recruiting/retaining well-trained police/firefighters; preventing property crimes/ thefts; addressing homelessness; keeping public areas/parks safe/clean; maintaining safe routes to school; repairing streets/potholes by establishing a 0.5% transactions and use tax (sales tax) providing approximately $19,000,000 annually expiring after 10 years; requiring audits, spending disclosure, all funds benefiting City of Orange residents, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28299, "no_votes": 28792, "total_votes": 57091, "percent_yes": 49.56823317160323, "percent_no": 50.43176682839677, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.416499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.983658", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1773, "fingerprint": "2024|202400314|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400314|PLACER", "content_hash": "65ac41eb70cc660c", "measure_id": "202400314", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of town clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1179, "no_votes": 1172, "total_votes": 2351, "percent_yes": 50.14887282007656, "percent_no": 49.85112717992344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure changes the town clerk position in Placer, California fro...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure changes the town clerk position in Placer, California from an elected office to one that is appointed by other town officials.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.419676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.985361", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1775, "fingerprint": "2024|202400316|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400316|PLACER", "content_hash": "4fd40df7ff75006e", "measure_id": "202400316", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure to reduce traffic congestion and build transportation projects in Roseville, Rocklin, and Lincoln-including widening Highway 65; fixing the 80/65 Interchange bottleneck; funding local road repair; guaranteeing more State transportation matching funds; and authorizing bond financing-by establishing a half-cent sales tax that cannot be taken by the State and would raise approximately $41,000,000 annually over 30 years, with independent audits and a citizens' oversight committee, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 93436, "no_votes": 52941, "total_votes": 146377, "percent_yes": 63.83243269092822, "percent_no": 36.16756730907178, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.420293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.985664", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1776, "fingerprint": "2024|202400317|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400317|PLACER", "content_hash": "729a473b8ed8c02a", "measure_id": "202400317", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to continue \u2013 without increasing taxes \u2013 a local general tax originally approved by voters in 2016 for general government use including keeping the Loomis Library and Community Learning Center open and continuing to provide library/learning center services and access to computers and technology, by extending the existing one-quarter percent transaction and use tax until ended by voters, and providing approximately $925,000 each year subject to annual audits and public review, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2819, "no_votes": 1129, "total_votes": 3948, "percent_yes": 71.403242147923, "percent_no": 28.596757852077005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues an existing one-quarter percent sales tax in Placer Co...", "summary_text": "This measure continues an existing one-quarter percent sales tax in Placer County that was originally approved in 2016, extending it indefinitely until ended by voters to fund general government services including the Loomis Library and Community Learning Center. The tax generates approximately $925,000 annually and is subject to annual audits and public review.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.420570", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.985815", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1779, "fingerprint": "2024|202400646|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400646|PLACER", "content_hash": "58dd38e3340944bd", "measure_id": "202400646", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade local prekindergarten - 8th grade classrooms/labs/restrooms, remove hazardous materials where discovered, fix leaky roofs, failing heating, cooling, gas, electrical, and plumbing for safe drinking water, shall Loomis Union School District's measure be adopted authorizing $48,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, averaging $27 /$100,000 of assessed value, (raising $2,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, public spending reports, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7353, "no_votes": 7288, "total_votes": 14641, "percent_yes": 50.22197937299365, "percent_no": 49.77802062700635, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Loomis Union School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Loomis Union School District to issue $48 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and lab upgrades, hazardous material removal, roof repairs, and heating/cooling/plumbing system fixes for prekindergarten through 8th grade schools. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes averaging $27 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising approximately $2.7 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.523854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.038286", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1774, "fingerprint": "2024|202400315|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400315|PLACER", "content_hash": "4c63a7bd9e3d9069", "measure_id": "202400315", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure funding police, fire, street maintenance, pothole repairs, parks, and for general government use for maintaining other City services by increasing the City's transient occupancy tax (paid only by hotel and lodging guests) on hotel rent by 2% matching nearby city rates, and by extending it to short-term rentals, to last until voters end it, raising approximately $162,000 in additional revenue per year that cannot be taken by the State, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5120, "no_votes": 2692, "total_votes": 7812, "percent_yes": 65.54019457245263, "percent_no": 34.459805427547366, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Placer's transient occupancy tax on hotel rent by 2% a...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Placer's transient occupancy tax on hotel rent by 2% and extends it to short-term rentals, generating approximately $162,000 annually for police, fire, street maintenance, parks, and other city services. The tax is paid by hotel and lodging guests and remains in effect until voters decide to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.419998", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.985510", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1777, "fingerprint": "2024|202400644|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400644|PLACER", "content_hash": "2bc7da9fc965089b", "measure_id": "202400644", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Bowman Charter School; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade playgrounds and playfields; and make energy-efficiency improvements; shall Ackerman Charter School District's measure be adopted authorizing $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $260,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $26.85 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 772, "no_votes": 741, "total_votes": 1513, "percent_yes": 51.02445472571051, "percent_no": 48.97554527428949, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Ackerman Charter School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Ackerman Charter School District to issue $4 million in bonds to fund facility improvements at Bowman Charter School, including HVAC system replacement, classroom and restroom modernization, playground upgrades, and energy efficiency improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately $26.85 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.523286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.037967", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1780, "fingerprint": "2024|202400647|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400647|PLACER", "content_hash": "5cd9e36fbd8fe8c9", "measure_id": "202400647", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair Colfax High School's leaky roofs, outdated gas/ sewer/ electrical systems, upgrade plumbing to maintain safe drinking water; remove asbestos/ lead paint; reduce wildfire risk; upgrade classrooms/ labs for science, technology, engineering, math and career training, shall Colfax High School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of Placer Union High School District's measure be adopted, authorizing $21,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 assessed valuation (approximately $1,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring public spending disclosure, oversight, all funds for Colfax High School only?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6677, "no_votes": 5975, "total_votes": 12652, "percent_yes": 52.77426493834967, "percent_no": 47.22573506165033, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized $21 million in bonds to fund repairs and u...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized $21 million in bonds to fund repairs and upgrades at Colfax High School, including fixing infrastructure systems, removing hazardous materials, and modernizing classrooms and labs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes of $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.524124", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.038438", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1778, "fingerprint": "2024|202400645|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400645|PLACER", "content_hash": "d3f9d058bc14ed71", "measure_id": "202400645", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of local schools; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Elverta Joint Elementary School District's measure authorizing $4,300,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $267, 190 annually while bonds are outstanding at estimated average rates of $29.14 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 112, "no_votes": 100, "total_votes": 212, "percent_yes": 52.83018867924528, "percent_no": 47.16981132075472, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Elverta Joint Elementary School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Elverta Joint Elementary School District to issue $4.3 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including electrical system upgrades, roof replacements, classroom modernization, and health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $29.14 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.523589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.038133", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1781, "fingerprint": "2024|202400059|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400059|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "e7a9d08c192fa433", "measure_id": "202400059", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLUMAS Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 23-___ of the County of Plumas, authorizing the County of Plumas to impose a special transaction and use tax in the total amount of three fourth percent (3/4%) to be used solely for purpose of providing the citizens with Sheriff services through the Plumas County Sheriff's Office be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3933, "no_votes": 2677, "total_votes": 6610, "percent_yes": 59.50075642965204, "percent_no": 40.49924357034796, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.332212", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.944701", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLUMAS Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1782, "fingerprint": "2024|202400060|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400060|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "c8a9b78f7b45de42", "measure_id": "202400060", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLUMAS Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure authorizing the County of Plumas to impose a special transaction and use tax in the total amount of three fourth percent (3/4%) to be used solely for purpose of providing the citizens in Plumas County Public Safety Services through the Plumas County Sheriff's Office be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4618, "no_votes": 4800, "total_votes": 9418, "percent_yes": 49.033765130600976, "percent_no": 50.966234869399024, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.332507", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.944896", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLUMAS Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1794, "fingerprint": "2024|202400648|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400648|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "be3fa8c5e864024a", "measure_id": "202400648", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, career training facilities, and instructional technology to support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts/skilled trades; safeguard student safety; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, ventilation systems; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment; shall Desert Sands Unified School District's measure authorizing $675,000,000 in bonds at legal interest but without increasing current tax rates be adopted, levying $60 per $100,000 assessed value ($45,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight/audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23085, "no_votes": 16835, "total_votes": 39920, "percent_yes": 57.82815631262525, "percent_no": 42.17184368737475, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Desert Sands Unified School District to issue $67...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Desert Sands Unified School District to issue $675 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, science labs, career training facilities, and technology, as well as repair infrastructure systems and construct new facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.524419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.038588", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1783, "fingerprint": "2024|202400318|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400318|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "25106477ccd2f1fc", "measure_id": "202400318", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Riverside adopt an ordinance establishing a tax on all cannabis businesses at a maximum rate of 10% of the gross receipts of each business, potentially generating $2,000,000 or more in revenues annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, until repealed by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27252, "no_votes": 17085, "total_votes": 44337, "percent_yes": 61.46559307124975, "percent_no": 38.53440692875025, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a tax on cannabis businesses in Riverside at up to 1...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a tax on cannabis businesses in Riverside at up to 10% of gross receipts, with potential annual revenue of $2 million or more for general city purposes. The tax would remain in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.420881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.985979", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1798, "fingerprint": "2024|202400652|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400652|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "11de81b9f5ea05b5", "measure_id": "202400652", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and improve aging neighborhood schools; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; remove asbestos and lead pipes; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, labs, sites, facilities/ equipment; support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts and skilled trades; shall Colton Joint Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $225,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 4 cents per $100 assessed value ($6,300,000 Annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 196, "no_votes": 154, "total_votes": 350, "percent_yes": 56.00000000000001, "percent_no": 43.99999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Colton Joint Unified School District to issue $22...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Colton Joint Unified School District to issue $225 million in bonds to repair and improve school facilities, including fixing roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, removing hazardous materials, and constructing new classrooms and laboratories. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 4 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.525586", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.039207", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1807, "fingerprint": "2024|202400662|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400662|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8f817b956d8c5c10", "measure_id": "202400662", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve student safety/security; build classrooms/schools to relieve overcrowding; fix roofs, plumbing/electrical/ventilation systems; and repair/upgrade classrooms, science labs, and school facilities that support instruction in science, technology, engineering, arts, and math; shall San Jacinto Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $78,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (approximately $5,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrators, and all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10112, "no_votes": 5007, "total_votes": 15119, "percent_yes": 66.88273033930815, "percent_no": 33.117269660691846, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Jacinto Unified School District to issue $78 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Jacinto Unified School District to issue $78 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including safety upgrades, new classrooms to address overcrowding, and repairs to infrastructure and instructional facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.530440", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.040766", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1805, "fingerprint": "2024|202400660|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400660|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7061b82a34fb80b5", "measure_id": "202400660", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade local community colleges, improve access to affordable higher education for careers/skilled trades/ university transfer; provide safe drinking water; meet earthquake, disability access and safety regulations; upgrade security; acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment; shall Riverside Community College District\u2019s measure be adopted, authorizing $954,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $19 per $100,000 of assessed valuation ($57,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding), with oversight, audits/ spending disclosure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 197555, "no_votes": 142462, "total_votes": 340017, "percent_yes": 58.10150668937142, "percent_no": 41.89849331062858, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Riverside Community College District to issue $95...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Riverside Community College District to issue $954 million in bonds to repair and upgrade college facilities, improve safety and accessibility, and construct new educational facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of $19 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.529304", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.040440", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1797, "fingerprint": "2024|202400651|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400651|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a072abbf2a3378b9", "measure_id": "202400651", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve student safety/security systems, repair/replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and construct/upgrade/repair classrooms, labs, schools and career technology facilities to relieve overcrowding and support college/career readiness in science, technology, engineering, arts, math and skilled trades, shall Beaumont Unified School District\u2019s School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 measure authorizing $148,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $28 per $100,000 assessed value ($10,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, independent audits, all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13165, "no_votes": 11619, "total_votes": 24784, "percent_yes": 53.11894770819884, "percent_no": 46.88105229180116, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.525284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.039038", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1790, "fingerprint": "2024|202400325|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400325|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "29d2582bec5d755f", "measure_id": "202400325", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain Palm Desert's long-term finances, City services such as 9-1-1 emergency medical/police/fire response, fire protection, response to property crime/thefts, keeping public areas safe/clean, maintaining streets, roads, parks, youth/senior programs; retain/attract local businesses; and for general government use, shall the measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax generating approximately $25,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, funds controlled locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16342, "no_votes": 8599, "total_votes": 24941, "percent_yes": 65.52263341485907, "percent_no": 34.47736658514093, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Palm Desert that would generat...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Palm Desert that would generate approximately $25 million annually for general city services including emergency response, fire protection, street maintenance, parks, and other municipal operations. The tax would remain in effect until ended by voters and requires public spending disclosure with funds controlled locally.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.423513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.987103", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1804, "fingerprint": "2024|202400659|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400659|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ead8f54c2010f014", "measure_id": "202400659", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair, modernize, and construct classrooms, instructional technology, and facilities at neighborhood elementary schools to relieve overcrowding and support student achievement in math, science, technology, arts, and reading; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical; improve school safety and security systems; shall Perris Elementary School District's measure authorizing $38,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (averaging $3,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7262, "no_votes": 3074, "total_votes": 10336, "percent_yes": 70.25928792569658, "percent_no": 29.740712074303417, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Perris Elementary School District to issue $38 mi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Perris Elementary School District to issue $38 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct school facilities including classrooms, technology infrastructure, and safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.528760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.040281", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1806, "fingerprint": "2024|202400661|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400661|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "32dc6edc9334626b", "measure_id": "202400661", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of schools, student safety and security; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical; build additional classrooms/school facilities to relieve overcrowding and support student achievement in science, technology, engineering, arts/math, shall Romoland School District's measure authorizing $58,455,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (approximately $4.1 million annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all money locally- controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8854, "no_votes": 6172, "total_votes": 15026, "percent_yes": 58.92453081325703, "percent_no": 41.07546918674297, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Romoland School District to issue $58,455,000 in ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Romoland School District to issue $58,455,000 in bonds to fund school facility improvements including roof, plumbing, and electrical repairs, as well as construction of additional classrooms and facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.529839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.040606", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1791, "fingerprint": "2024|202400326|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400326|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a40a5cefb36e66fc", "measure_id": "202400326", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue funding for general City services such as expanding police and fire services, maintaining and improving streets, parks and infrastructure, supporting community non-profit organizations and improving the City library; shall the measure maintaining the Measure J City sales tax at a 1% rate and extending its term by repealing its March 31, 2037 expiration date/sunset, generating approximately $22,000,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16479, "no_votes": 6759, "total_votes": 23238, "percent_yes": 70.91402013942681, "percent_no": 29.08597986057319, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Riverside's existing 1% sales tax (Measure J) indefinite...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Riverside's existing 1% sales tax (Measure J) indefinitely by removing its March 31, 2037 expiration date, continuing to generate approximately $22 million annually for general city services including police, fire, streets, parks, infrastructure, community nonprofits, and library improvements. The measure passed with 50.7% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.423843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.987264", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1802, "fingerprint": "2024|202400657|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400657|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "fe8725079d48804b", "measure_id": "202400657", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct, repair, and improve classrooms, science labs, and school facilities to avoid overcrowding and support student achievement in science, technology, engineering, arts, and math, improve safety and security systems and fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, cooling, and electrical systems, shall Nuview Union School District's measure authorizing $15,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying on average 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (approximately $1,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, and money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2055, "no_votes": 1399, "total_votes": 3454, "percent_yes": 59.496236247828605, "percent_no": 40.503763752171395, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Nuview Union School District to issue $15 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Nuview Union School District to issue $15 million in bonds to construct, repair, and improve school facilities including classrooms, science labs, safety systems, and building infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging 3 cents per $100 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.527389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.039969", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1792, "fingerprint": "2024|202400327|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400327|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e6aa96a1150100f5", "measure_id": "202400327", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to amend the Charter of the City of Riverside to include a new Charter officer, the Inspector General, appointed by the City Council, with the powers and duties to investigate fraud, waste, abuse and illegal acts within city government and to provide annual reportson findings and recommendations, with an appropriate budget and with further powers and duties of the Inspector General set by ordinance\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0City\u00a0Council\u00a0be\u00a0adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65528, "no_votes": 34933, "total_votes": 100461, "percent_yes": 65.22730213714775, "percent_no": 34.772697862852255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Riverside's city charter to create a new Inspector Genera...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Riverside's city charter to create a new Inspector General position appointed by the City Council with authority to investigate fraud, waste, abuse, and illegal acts within city government and provide annual reports on findings and recommendations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.424209", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.987415", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1793, "fingerprint": "2024|202400328|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400328|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2d4d6278c43daf96", "measure_id": "202400328", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City of Temecula Municipal Code providing that no person shall be eligible for nomination, appointment, and/ or election to the office of Member of the City Council for more than three ( 3) four (4) year terms during their lifetime?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40988, "no_votes": 7877, "total_votes": 48865, "percent_yes": 83.88007776527166, "percent_no": 16.119922234728335, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Temecula's Municipal Code to limit City Council members t...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Temecula's Municipal Code to limit City Council members to a maximum of three four-year terms (12 years total) during their lifetime.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.424491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.987573", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1788, "fingerprint": "2024|202400323|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400323|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b8d5ac4fa9ed4c4d", "measure_id": "202400323", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To address homelessness, make public areas safer and cleaner, including streets and sidewalks, and other essential government services such as 911 response, pothole repair, senior and youth programs, improving public arts and culture, and parks and recreational facilities, shall a measure increasing Hemet's transient occupancy tax by 2% - which is paid entirely by overnight hotel guests - providing an additional $ 200,000 annually, until ended by voters, that cannot be taken by the State, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21961, "no_votes": 6974, "total_votes": 28935, "percent_yes": 75.89770174529117, "percent_no": 24.102298254708828, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Hemet's transient occupancy tax by 2 percentage points...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Hemet's transient occupancy tax by 2 percentage points, generating approximately $200,000 annually from hotel guests to fund various city services including homelessness programs, street maintenance, emergency response, and parks and recreation. The tax increase continues indefinitely until ended by voters and cannot be redirected by the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.422729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.986791", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1796, "fingerprint": "2024|202400650|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400650|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a3e1c2ffaf323c89", "measure_id": "202400650", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Banning Unified School District's measure to repair/replace aging roofs, electrical, plumbing, heating, and air-conditioning systems; renovate classrooms and educational facilities; and upgrade school security systems be adopted, authorizing $74 million of bonds with legal rates, average levies below $51 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding (raising $4.4 million annually), audits, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and full disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7607, "no_votes": 4200, "total_votes": 11807, "percent_yes": 64.42788176505462, "percent_no": 35.57211823494538, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Banning Unified School District to issue $74 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Banning Unified School District to issue $74 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school infrastructure including roofs, electrical systems, plumbing, HVAC, classrooms, and security systems. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging below $51 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.524983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.038886", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1787, "fingerprint": "2024|202400322|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400322|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "db509c507780d4f6", "measure_id": "202400322", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to maintain Desert Hot Springs\u2019 fiscal stability/general services, including maintaining 911 emergency/police response; anti-gang/drug programs; crime prevention/ investigation; disaster preparation; pothole repair; preventing road/bridge closures; homelessness prevention; attracting local businesses by keeping public areas clean, safe, well-lit; by establishing a 1\u20b5 sales tax, providing approximately $2,400,000 annually until ended by voters, with public spending disclosure/all funds spent in Desert Hot Springs, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6272, "no_votes": 1726, "total_votes": 7998, "percent_yes": 78.4196049012253, "percent_no": 21.5803950987747, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Desert Hot Springs to fund gen...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Desert Hot Springs to fund general city services including police, emergency response, road maintenance, crime prevention, disaster preparation, and homelessness programs, generating approximately $2.4 million annually. The tax continues until voters choose to end it and requires public spending disclosure with all funds spent within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.422413", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.986598", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11005, "fingerprint": "2024|202400655|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400655|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7eeceb15f08de411", "measure_id": "202400655", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prevent overcrowding by building three elementary schools and one middle school with technologically advanced designs; improve school safety, security, disability access; repair or replace old roofing, heating, ventilation; remove asbestos, lead paint, mold; provide safe drinking water; shall Menifee Union School District's measure be adopted authorizing $205,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value (approximately $12,400,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent oversight, audits, assuring all money is for Menifee Union School District schools only?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29543, "no_votes": 23003, "total_votes": 52546, "percent_yes": 56.22311879115441, "percent_no": 43.77688120884559, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Menifee Union School District to issue $205 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Menifee Union School District to issue $205 million in bonds to build three elementary schools and one middle school, improve safety and security systems, and repair aging infrastructure including roofing, HVAC systems, and hazardous materials removal. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $12.4 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.129662", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.526456", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.039657", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1795, "fingerprint": "2024|202400649|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400649|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "fa3e18c5d7e7af47", "measure_id": "202400649", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure R1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall JOSEPH WAYNE KOMROSKY be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member, Temecula Valley Unified School District, Trustee Area 4?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4963, "no_votes": 4751, "total_votes": 9714, "percent_yes": 51.09120856495779, "percent_no": 48.90879143504221, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asks voters whether to recall Joseph Wayne Komrosky from ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asks voters whether to recall Joseph Wayne Komrosky from his position as a Governing Board Member for Trustee Area 4 of the Temecula Valley Unified School District. The measure passed, meaning Komrosky was removed from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-06-04", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.524715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.038738", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure R1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1803, "fingerprint": "2024|202400658|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400658|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "98196888cc5e01a6", "measure_id": "202400658", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With no increase in current estimated tax rates, shall Palm Springs Unified School District's measure to expand Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics labs; improve vocational/career technical education classrooms; and replace air-conditioning and security systems be adopted, authorizing $465 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $40 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding (raising $30 million annually), citizen oversight, state matching funds eligibility, public disclosure of spending, and no funds taken by the state?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50995, "no_votes": 17155, "total_votes": 68150, "percent_yes": 74.82758620689656, "percent_no": 25.172413793103445, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Palm Springs Unified School District to issue $465 mi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Palm Springs Unified School District to issue $465 million in bonds to expand STEAM labs, improve vocational/career technical education classrooms, and replace air-conditioning and security systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes with average levies below $40 per $100,000 of assessed valuation and include citizen oversight and public disclosure requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.528164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.040130", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1800, "fingerprint": "2024|202400654|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400654|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "df0949f22211d0d1", "measure_id": "202400654", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade classrooms/science labs, career technical and school facilities to support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts, and skilled trades; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems; improve school safety/security systems; and remove asbestos/lead pipes, shall Lake Elsinore Unified School District's measure authorizing 198,000,000 dollars in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $28 per $100,000 assessed value ($11,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31548, "no_votes": 20768, "total_votes": 52316, "percent_yes": 60.30277544154752, "percent_no": 39.69722455845248, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Lake Elsinore Unified School District to issue $1...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Lake Elsinore Unified School District to issue $198 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, labs, safety systems, and infrastructure improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $28 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.526150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.039507", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1789, "fingerprint": "2024|202400324|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400324|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "6bbe860dc7bbdbed", "measure_id": "202400324", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain critical Moreno Valley services, including 9-1-1 response times, robbery/burglary prevention, neighborhood police patrols/fire service levels; address homelessness; repair streets/potholes; keep public areas safe/clean; help retain businesses; and for general government use, shall the measure establishing a locally-controlled 1\u00a2 transaction and use (sales) tax, first enacted by local voters in 2021, generating approximately $30,000,000 annually until ended by voters, with audits/spending disclosure,\u00a0be\u00a0adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43551, "no_votes": 15145, "total_votes": 58696, "percent_yes": 74.19756031075372, "percent_no": 25.802439689246285, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopts a locally-controlled 1-cent sales tax that was first enac...", "summary_text": "This measure adopts a locally-controlled 1-cent sales tax that was first enacted by voters in 2021, generating approximately $30 million annually for Moreno Valley city services including police, fire, street repairs, and homelessness programs. The tax continues until ended by voters and includes requirements for audits and spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.423207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.986944", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1799, "fingerprint": "2024|202400653|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400653|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "89076fbdb4a200d8", "measure_id": "202400653", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ upgrade older schools; fix deteriorating roofs, dry rot, plumbing, electrical; remove asbestos/ lead pipes; improve student safety/ security; and support college/ career readiness in math, science, engineering, technology, arts, and skilled trades by modernizing classrooms, science labs, school facilities, technology, shall Jurupa Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $180,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 4 cents per $100 assessed value ($12,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20131, "no_votes": 10197, "total_votes": 30328, "percent_yes": 66.37760485360063, "percent_no": 33.62239514639937, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Jurupa Unified School District to issue $180 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Jurupa Unified School District to issue $180 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including fixing deteriorating infrastructure, removing hazardous materials, and modernizing classrooms and labs. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 4 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.525854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.039358", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1785, "fingerprint": "2024|202400320|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400320|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f60d4133aaa93637", "measure_id": "202400320", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure providing funding for Cathedral City's general services such as maintaining 911 medical emergency/ambulance/fire/police response and gang prevention programs; recruiting/retaining well-trained paramedics/firefighters; repairing streets/potholes; preparing for/responding to and recovering from rainstorms/natural disasters; keeping public areas/parks safe/clean; addressing homelessness; by increasing sales tax by \u00bd\u00a2 providing $5,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, spending disclosure, funds locally controlled be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13450, "no_votes": 4839, "total_votes": 18289, "percent_yes": 73.54147301656734, "percent_no": 26.458526983432662, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Cathedral City's sales tax by 0", "summary_text": "This measure increases Cathedral City's sales tax by 0.5 cents to generate approximately $5 million annually for general city services including emergency response, street repairs, park maintenance, and homeless services. The measure requires regular audits and spending disclosure, with funds remaining under local control until voters choose to end the tax.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.421650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.986280", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1801, "fingerprint": "2024|202400656|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400656|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "0c3814d037f61921", "measure_id": "202400656", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide safe, modern schools; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical/ventilation systems; repair, acquire, construct classrooms, science labs, career technology, equipment, sites and school facilities to support student achievement in math, science, technology, arts, engineering, skilled trades; shall Moreno Valley Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $240,000,000 in bonds at legal rates (without increasing current tax rates), levying $40 per $100,000 assessed value ($16,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35235, "no_votes": 15346, "total_votes": 50581, "percent_yes": 69.66054447322118, "percent_no": 30.33945552677882, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Moreno Valley Unified School District to issue $2...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Moreno Valley Unified School District to issue $240 million in bonds to repair, upgrade, and construct school facilities including classrooms, labs, and infrastructure systems. The bonds would be funded through property taxes levying $40 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.526736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.039819", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1786, "fingerprint": "2024|202400321|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400321|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a169ce0337af6ed8", "measure_id": "202400321", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to increase the rate of the City\u2019s Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax from 9% to a maximum of 13%, providing approximately $350,000 annually until ended by voters for general City services such as City parks, streets and public safety, and applying the tax to all rent charged to hotel guests, including by online travel and short term rental companies, for transient occupancy of any hotel, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4559, "no_votes": 4198, "total_votes": 8757, "percent_yes": 52.061208176316086, "percent_no": 47.938791823683914, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Riverside's transient occupancy tax rate from 9% to a ...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Riverside's transient occupancy tax rate from 9% to a maximum of 13% and applies the tax to all rent charged by hotels, online travel companies, and short-term rental companies. The increase is expected to generate approximately $350,000 annually for general city services including parks, streets, and public safety.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.422020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.986439", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1784, "fingerprint": "2024|202400319|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400319|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "bd845725b0e600b2", "measure_id": "202400319", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding that may only be used for police, fire, 911 response, and other public safety services, shall a measure restricting the use of already existing utility users taxes on water and sewer services and emergency medical service subscription/response fees as well as establishing a 0.75% transactions and use (sales) tax and a 6% retail cannabis tax, providing approximately $855,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3228, "no_votes": 3253, "total_votes": 6481, "percent_yes": 49.80712852954791, "percent_no": 50.19287147045209, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.421370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.986131", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1808, "fingerprint": "2024|202400061|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400061|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "9712c441b0896359", "measure_id": "202400061", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the City of Sacramento\u2019s perpetual business operations tax \u2013 by increasing the gross receipts taxable threshold to $100,000, setting new flat tax rates for professionals ($684), setting new flat tax rates for nonexempt residential rentals, hotels, and short-term rentals ($114, plus 2.85/unit above thresholds), and setting new maximum annual tax liability, all with yearly cost-of-living adjustments for an estimated annual increase of $6,000,000 for general governmental use \u2013 be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37993, "no_votes": 60778, "total_votes": 98771, "percent_yes": 38.46574399368235, "percent_no": 61.53425600631765, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended Sacramento's business operations tax by raisi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended Sacramento's business operations tax by raising the gross receipts threshold to $100,000, establishing flat tax rates of $684 for professionals and $114 plus $2.85 per unit for rental properties and hotels, and adding annual cost-of-living adjustments. The changes were projected to generate an additional $6 million annually for general city services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.332816", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.945089", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1810, "fingerprint": "2024|202400330|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400330|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "d169a8449db9a528", "measure_id": "202400330", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure combining and\u00a0extending existing parcel taxes generating approximately $9.6 million/year for library\u00a0 services \u2013 including programs for children, teens, and seniors; homework assistance;\u200b\u00a0operating hours; books; 24/7 online access; and other services \u2013 at current rates (single-family residences $54.50/year; other properties at specified amounts; adjusted\u00a0annually for inflation), with independent financial audits ensuring funds are only spent\u00a0on City of Sacramento libraries, until ended by voters, be adopted?\u200b", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 139122, "no_votes": 48345, "total_votes": 187467, "percent_yes": 74.21146121717422, "percent_no": 25.788538782825782, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure combines and extends existing parcel taxes for Sacramento librar...", "summary_text": "This measure combines and extends existing parcel taxes for Sacramento libraries at current rates ($54.50 annually for single-family homes), generating approximately $9.6 million per year to fund library services, programs, and operations until terminated by future voter action. The measure passed with 70.7% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.425157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.987890", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1809, "fingerprint": "2024|202400329|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400329|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "e837a7e3cb60fb6e", "measure_id": "202400329", "measure_letter": "\u200bG", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bG", "description": null, "ballot_question": "\u200bShall the measure to enact a 1 percent transaction and use tax (sales tax), providing approximately\u00a0$29 million annually until ended by voters, requiring local control, citizen oversight, independent\u00a0annual audits, all funds staying in Folsom and the proceeds used only for the following: 20% -\u00a0police services, 20% - fire protection, 15% - parks/trail improvement, 15% - traffic/street\u00a0maintenance, 15% - community\u00a0 enhancement/economic development, and 15% - major capital\u00a0improvement projects, be adopted?\u200b", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15980, "no_votes": 26326, "total_votes": 42306, "percent_yes": 37.7724199877086, "percent_no": 62.2275800122914, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.424822", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.987726", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bG", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1816, "fingerprint": "2024|202400668|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400668|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "d634d2bdfd3fc88c", "measure_id": "202400668", "measure_letter": "\u200bH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide a high-quality education for all students by keeping schools safe/clean; repair deteriorating\u00a0roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation systems; improve school security/fire safety, upgrade\u200bscience/engineering/technology classrooms/labs; increase disability access, shall Galt Joint\u00a0 Union\u00a0Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $27,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates,\u00a0levying 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation, raising $1,960,000 annually while bonds are\u00a0outstanding, be adopted, requiring audits, independent citizen oversight, and all funds controlled\u00a0locally?\u200b", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7056, "no_votes": 5219, "total_votes": 12275, "percent_yes": 57.48268839103869, "percent_no": 42.51731160896131, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Galt Joint Union Elementary School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Galt Joint Union Elementary School District to issue $27 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including repairs to roofs, plumbing, and HVAC systems, security upgrades, classroom modernization, and disability access improvements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $1.96 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.533650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.041741", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1813, "fingerprint": "2024|202400665|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400665|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "e531d099ed769862", "measure_id": "202400665", "measure_letter": "\u200bJ", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bJ", "description": null, "ballot_question": "\u200bTo improve the quality of local schools; upgrade inadequate electrical systems;\u00a0replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school\u00a0facilities; and make health, safety and\u00a0 handicapped accessibility improvements;\u00a0shall Elverta Joint Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $4,300,000 of\u00a0bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $267,190 annually\u00a0while bonds are outstanding at estimated average rates of $29.14 per $100,000\u00a0assessed value, with annual audits,\u00a0independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for\u00a0salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 599, "no_votes": 487, "total_votes": 1086, "percent_yes": 55.156537753222835, "percent_no": 44.843462246777165, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Elverta Joint Elementary School District to issue $4", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Elverta Joint Elementary School District to issue $4.3 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including electrical system upgrades, roof replacements, classroom modernization, and health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $29.14 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.531819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.041257", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bJ", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1818, "fingerprint": "2024|202400670|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400670|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "fdbd83bb31e733f1", "measure_id": "202400670", "measure_letter": "\u200bK", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bK", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local community college classrooms/ labs/ access for nursing/ vocational career training, student safety; remove asbestos, lead paint, mold; ensure safe drinking water; repair deteriorating\u00a0sewers, roofs; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, sites, facilities, equipment; shall San Joaquin Delta\u00a0Community College District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1\u2019s measure authorizing\u00a0$598,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $16 per $100,000 assessed valuation, generating\u00a0$34,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring local control, oversight,\u00a0audits, spending disclosure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7045, "no_votes": 8444, "total_votes": 15489, "percent_yes": 45.483891794176515, "percent_no": 54.516108205823485, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the San Joaquin Delta Community College Di...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the San Joaquin Delta Community College District to issue $598 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom construction and repairs, safety upgrades, asbestos and lead paint removal, and equipment acquisition. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of $16 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating approximately $34.8 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.534934", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.042074", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bK", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1811, "fingerprint": "2024|202400663|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400663|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "88bfa0574cc563b8", "measure_id": "202400663", "measure_letter": "\u200bM", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide clean/safe classrooms; provide science/engineering/technology/agricultural education\u00a0 labs; prevent overcrowded classrooms; continue to provide safe drinking water; improve\u00a0 safety/security; improve disabled accessibility; to provide high-quality education, retain/attract\u00a0 quality teachers, shall Arcohe Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $5,800,000 in bonds at\u00a0 legal rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation, raising $451,000 annually while bonds are\u00a0 outstanding, be adopted, requiring audits, public oversight/ spending disclosure, funds controlled\u00a0 locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1251, "no_votes": 1232, "total_votes": 2483, "percent_yes": 50.38260169150222, "percent_no": 49.61739830849778, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.531050", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.040932", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1812, "fingerprint": "2024|202400664|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400664|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "e8210644c3fd6ffd", "measure_id": "202400664", "measure_letter": "\u200bN\u200b\u200b", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bN\u200b\u200b", "description": null, "ballot_question": "\u200bTo repair, modernize, and construct classrooms, labs, school and career technical facilities to relieve overcrowding and support college/career readiness in science, technology, engineering, math, arts, and skilled trades, fix roofs, plumbing, electrical, water, and safety/security systems, shall Elk Grove Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $542,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, averaging annual levies of 3.4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($37,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84078, "no_votes": 54535, "total_votes": 138613, "percent_yes": 60.65664836631485, "percent_no": 39.34335163368515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Elk Grove Unified School District to issue $542 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Elk Grove Unified School District to issue $542 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct school facilities including classrooms, labs, and technical facilities, as well as fix infrastructure systems like roofs, plumbing, and electrical. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging 3.4 cents per $100 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.531502", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.041095", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bN\u200b\u200b", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1819, "fingerprint": "2024|202400671|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400671|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "0ebba5b03f843178", "measure_id": "202400671", "measure_letter": "\u200bP\u200b", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bP\u200b", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prepare students for college/careers by repairing/upgrading aging classrooms; leaky roofs; math/science labs; removing asbestos/lead; improving education by retaining/attracting quality teachers in safe/clean schools; shall San Juan Unified School District's measure authorizing $950,000,000\u00a0in bonds at legal rates, levying rates of approximately\u00a06\u00a2/$100 of assessed value be adopted, generating approximately $55,600,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring funds remain local, public disclosure of spending, citizens' oversight/independent audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92522, "no_votes": 59483, "total_votes": 152005, "percent_yes": 60.867734613992965, "percent_no": 39.132265386007035, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the San Juan Unified School District to issue $950 mil...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the San Juan Unified School District to issue $950 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including fixing roofs, upgrading classrooms and labs, and removing hazardous materials. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $55.6 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.535504", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.042237", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bP\u200b", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1814, "fingerprint": "2024|202400666|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400666|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "4aa42017fb406fdc", "measure_id": "202400666", "measure_letter": "\u200bR", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bR", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade existing Rancho Cordova elementary schools\u2019 deteriorating classrooms, electrical systems/wiring, leaky roofs, school playgrounds; improve safety/security/fire systems, disabled accessibility; acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment; shall Folsom Cordova Unified School District\u2019s School Facilities Improvement District 4\u2019s measure authorizing $144,000,000 in bonds at legal rates,\u00a0 levying 6\u00a2 per $100\u00a0 assessed valuation (approximately $8,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring public disclosure of spending, oversight, and to recruit/retain quality teachers?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13167, "no_votes": 6513, "total_votes": 19680, "percent_yes": 66.90548780487805, "percent_no": 33.09451219512195, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Folsom Cordova Unified School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Folsom Cordova Unified School District to issue $144 million in bonds to repair and upgrade elementary schools in Rancho Cordova, including fixing deteriorating classrooms, electrical systems, roofs, and playgrounds, while improving safety and accessibility features. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.532338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.041418", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bR", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1815, "fingerprint": "2024|202400667|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400667|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "d77c5f86a51d22be", "measure_id": "202400667", "measure_letter": "\u200bS", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade existing Rancho Cordova middle/high schools\u2019 vocational/career classrooms/labs, deteriorating electrical systems/wiring, leaky roofs; improve safety/security systems;\u00a0 acquire, construct, repair, facilities, sites, equipment; shall Folsom Cordova Unified School District\u2019s School Facilities Improvement District No. 4\u2019s measure authorizing $144,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted levying 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation (approximately $8,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring disclosure of spending, oversight, and to recruit/retain quality teachers?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12956, "no_votes": 6595, "total_votes": 19551, "percent_yes": 66.26771009155541, "percent_no": 33.732289908444585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Folsom Cordova Unified School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Folsom Cordova Unified School District to issue $144 million in bonds to repair and upgrade middle and high school facilities in Rancho Cordova, including vocational classrooms, electrical systems, roofs, and safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.533038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.041580", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200bS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1817, "fingerprint": "2024|202400669|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400669|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "8ac1bbf02cf62176", "measure_id": "202400669", "measure_letter": "\u200b\u200bD", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200b\u200bD", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere and no\u00a0\u200bprojected increase in current tax rates,\u00a0shall Sacramento City Unified School\u00a0District's measure to expand Science,\u200bTechnology, Engineering, Arts, and\u00a0Mathematics (STEAM) classrooms;\u200b\u00a0replace leaky roofs; and upgrade school\u00a0security be adopted, authorizing $543 million of bonds with legal rates, audits,\u200b\u00a0average levies below $35 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $36\u00a0million annually while outstanding), citizen oversight and full public disclosure\u00a0of all spending?\u200b\u200b\u200b", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 98698, "no_votes": 34473, "total_votes": 133171, "percent_yes": 74.11373347050034, "percent_no": 25.886266529499665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Sacramento City Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Sacramento City Unified School District to issue $543 million in bonds to expand STEAM classrooms, replace leaky roofs, and upgrade school security. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging below $35 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $36 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.534325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.041907", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure \u200b\u200bD", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1821, "fingerprint": "2024|202400063|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400063|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "5f688b66ccd60123", "measure_id": "202400063", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative be adopted to amend the County General Plan to require voter approval before re-designating (changing) Agricultural, Rural or Rangeland to other uses, and to remove the Commercial Regional Designation from four Highway 101 nodes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14800, "no_votes": 12021, "total_votes": 26821, "percent_yes": 55.18064203422691, "percent_no": 44.81935796577309, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative amends San Benito County's General Plan to require voter appr...", "summary_text": "This initiative amends San Benito County's General Plan to require voter approval before changing Agricultural, Rural, or Rangeland designations to other uses, and removes Commercial Regional Designation from four Highway 101 locations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.333468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.945458", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1820, "fingerprint": "2024|202400062|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400062|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "004f95f6fbe5f753", "measure_id": "202400062", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) To keep Hazel Hawkins Hospital public and under local control, shall the County of San Benito establish an agreement with the San Benito Health Care District and other interested jurisdictions to form a partnership in the form of a Joint Powers Authority to operate the hospital?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19484, "no_votes": 7169, "total_votes": 26653, "percent_yes": 73.10246501331933, "percent_no": 26.897534986680668, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Facilities: Health Facilities", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked voters whether San Benito County should establish...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked voters whether San Benito County should establish a Joint Powers Authority partnership with the San Benito Health Care District and other jurisdictions to operate Hazel Hawkins Hospital as a public facility under local control.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.333156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.945296", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1829, "fingerprint": "2024|202400677|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400677|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "cfc9d3436848e52d", "measure_id": "202400677", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Coalinga College with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall West Hills Community College District's measure to expand career training/technical educational classrooms and facilities; renovate outdated classrooms, labs, and student dorms; and improve campus safety be adopted, authorizing $19 million of bonds with estimated average levies below $24 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (approximately $1 million annually) while outstanding, with legal rates, audits, independent oversight and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 1, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the West Hills Community College District ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the West Hills Community College District to issue $19 million in bonds to expand career training facilities, renovate classrooms and labs, improve student dorms, and enhance campus safety at Coalinga College. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments estimated at less than $24 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.538374", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.043222", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1824, "fingerprint": "2024|202400672|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400672|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "0b396211718dda6b", "measure_id": "202400672", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s measure to renovate/modernize classrooms; expand coding, robotics and engineering workshops; replace leaky roofs; and upgrade fire alarms and emergency communication systems at Aromas School, San Juan School, and Anzar High be adopted, authorizing $44 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $55 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $2.7 million annually while outstanding), citizens\u2019 oversight, and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1807, "no_votes": 1180, "total_votes": 2987, "percent_yes": 60.49548041513224, "percent_no": 39.50451958486776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue $44 million in bonds to renovate classrooms, expand STEM facilities, replace roofs, and upgrade safety systems at three schools. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging below $55 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.536072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.042401", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1827, "fingerprint": "2024|202400675|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400675|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "39d420b52319fa92", "measure_id": "202400675", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade deteriorating academic/ vocational classrooms; replace outdated science/ technology/ computer labs; provide classrooms for future first responders; remove hazardous materials like asbestos, mold, lead paint; construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities, sites, and equipment, shall South Monterey County Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $35,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 assessed valuation, providing approximately $2,600,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, supporting local schools, requiring citizen oversight/ audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18, "no_votes": 31, "total_votes": 49, "percent_yes": 36.734693877551024, "percent_no": 63.265306122448976, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the South Monterey County Joint Union High...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the South Monterey County Joint Union High School District to issue $35 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms and labs, remove hazardous materials, and construct or repair school facilities and equipment. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.537309", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.042882", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1828, "fingerprint": "2024|202400676|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400676|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "42757eec1ae35d01", "measure_id": "202400676", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade emergency communication systems, fire alarms/sprinklers, safety door locks, security cameras,; repair deteriorating classrooms, restrooms; replace outdated, unsafe portables, electrical wiring; earthquake retrofit classrooms/ buildings; and construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities, sites, and equipment, shall South Monterey County Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $35,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 assessed valuation, providing approximately $2,600,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, supporting local schools, requiring citizen oversight/audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18, "no_votes": 31, "total_votes": 49, "percent_yes": 36.734693877551024, "percent_no": 63.265306122448976, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the South Monterey County Joint Union High...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the South Monterey County Joint Union High School District to issue $35 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including safety systems, classroom repairs, earthquake retrofitting, and equipment replacement. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.537899", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.043056", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1825, "fingerprint": "2024|202400673|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400673|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "dac86b2a3fdf038f", "measure_id": "202400673", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide high-quality education and instructional opportunities for local students at a second high school by creating classrooms and labs for vocational, college readiness and career pathways, agriculture, technology, core academics, and early college/ vocational classes with Gavilan College, shall San Benito High School District's measure be adopted authorizing $70,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $19/ $100,000 assessed value ($4,450,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11870, "no_votes": 11994, "total_votes": 23864, "percent_yes": 49.740194435132416, "percent_no": 50.259805564867584, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the San Benito High School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the San Benito High School District to issue $70 million in bonds to fund construction of classrooms and labs for a second high school, including facilities for vocational training, college readiness programs, and partnerships with Gavilan College. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes averaging $19 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.536409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.042566", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1826, "fingerprint": "2024|202400674|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400674|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "18a87d83e48bcb33", "measure_id": "202400674", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To relieve overcrowding at Hollister High and provide local high school students access to safe, quality education, including math, science, engineering, technology, other core academics, hands-on job skills, and career/ college readiness; and improve student safety by adding a second local high school, shall San Benito High School District's measure be adopted authorizing $70,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $19/ $100,000 assessed value ($4,450,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12046, "no_votes": 11700, "total_votes": 23746, "percent_yes": 50.72854375473764, "percent_no": 49.27145624526236, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized $70 million in bonds for the San Benito Hi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized $70 million in bonds for the San Benito High School District to build a second local high school to address overcrowding at Hollister High School. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes averaging $19 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.536789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.042726", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1822, "fingerprint": "2024|202400331|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400331|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "0166fe05aa7a0eee", "measure_id": "202400331", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure enacting a four percentage point (4%) increase to transient occupancy tax, increasing the total tax levied on hotel occupants from 8 to 12 percent, and reserving the increase for the general fund, generating approximately $300,000.00 annually for general City services such as public safety, park maintenance, recreation programs, street maintenance, solid waste, and community facilities maintenance until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8089, "no_votes": 7291, "total_votes": 15380, "percent_yes": 52.59427828348504, "percent_no": 47.40572171651496, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases San Benito's transient occupancy tax on hotel stays fr...", "summary_text": "This measure increases San Benito's transient occupancy tax on hotel stays from 8% to 12%, with the additional revenue going to the city's general fund. The 4 percentage point increase is expected to generate approximately $300,000 annually for general city services including public safety, parks, recreation, streets, waste management, and facility maintenance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.425428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.988055", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1823, "fingerprint": "2024|202400332|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400332|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "ea624894b97afc36", "measure_id": "202400332", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Commencing with the November 5, 2024 General Municipal Election, shall the term of office of Mayor be changed from two (2) years to four (4) years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4642, "no_votes": 10710, "total_votes": 15352, "percent_yes": 30.237102657634185, "percent_no": 69.76289734236582, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have extended the mayor's term of office in San Benito fro...", "summary_text": "This measure would have extended the mayor's term of office in San Benito from two years to four years, beginning with the November 2024 election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.425694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.988208", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1853, "fingerprint": "2024|202400687|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400687|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d2cb2daf4aed4f8b", "measure_id": "202400687", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To attract quality teachers, reduce high school overcrowding, prepare students for college and careers by: expanding the number of classrooms, including vocational/science/engineering labs; up-to- date school security/safe drinking water systems; shall Victor Valley Union High School District's measure authorizing $180,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $23 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $10,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring oversight, oublic spending disclosure, all funds be s.oent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31603, "no_votes": 15243, "total_votes": 46846, "percent_yes": 67.46146949579473, "percent_no": 32.53853050420527, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Victor Valley Union High School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Victor Valley Union High School District to issue $180 million in bonds to fund classroom expansion, vocational and science labs, and security and water system improvements. The bonds will be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $23 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating approximately $10 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.543927", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.044766", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1851, "fingerprint": "2024|202400685|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400685|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "549ba2a316529f1d", "measure_id": "202400685", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To retain teachers/ maintain quality local schools by upgrading older schools; ensuring school safety/ earthquake preparedness; fixing/ replacing leaky roofs, windows, plumbing; updating science, technology, engineering, math classrooms; qualifying for United States Department of Defense matching funds, shall Sierra Sands Unified School District's measure be adopted issuing $42,000,000 in bonds at limited interest rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation ($3,100,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, no money for administrators' salaries, requiring audits/ citizens oversight, all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42, "no_votes": 62, "total_votes": 104, "percent_yes": 40.38461538461539, "percent_no": 59.61538461538461, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized Sierra Sands Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized Sierra Sands Unified School District to issue $42 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including safety upgrades, roof and plumbing repairs, and modernization of STEM classrooms. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.542799", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.044444", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1845, "fingerprint": "2024|202400679|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400679|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "e77e4ce9261edafe", "measure_id": "202400679", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and improve aging neighborhood schools; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; remove asbestos and lead pipes; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, labs, sites, facilities/ equipment; support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts and skilled trades; shall Colton Joint Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $225,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 4 cents per $100 assessed value ($6,300,000 Annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22089, "no_votes": 10059, "total_votes": 32148, "percent_yes": 68.7103396789847, "percent_no": 31.289660321015305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Colton Joint Unified School District to issue $225...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Colton Joint Unified School District to issue $225 million in bonds to repair aging schools, upgrade facilities, and construct new classrooms and laboratories. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 4 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.539436", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.043536", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1847, "fingerprint": "2024|202400681|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400681|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "41e65ac21b2bfe3c", "measure_id": "202400681", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair or replace aging roofs; modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade aging electrical systems; and improve outdated technology; shall the Morongo Unified School District measure authorizing $88,300,000 in bonds, at legal rates, generating on average $5,361,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $36.19 per $100,000 of assessed value, be adopted, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for teacher or administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12789, "no_votes": 8399, "total_votes": 21188, "percent_yes": 60.359637530677745, "percent_no": 39.640362469322255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Morongo Unified School District to issue $88", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Morongo Unified School District to issue $88.3 million in bonds to repair roofs, modernize classrooms and facilities, upgrade electrical systems, and improve technology. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $36.19 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.540517", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.043838", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1849, "fingerprint": "2024|202400683|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400683|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "78928d4341ca6b5d", "measure_id": "202400683", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To retain/attract quality teachers, provide healthy/safe classrooms by protecting students from extreme heat, repairing deteriorating roofs/sewer lines, removing mold/asbestos/lead, providing safe drinking water, upgrading safety, career/vocational, science/engineering classrooms, shall Redlands Unified School District's measure authorizing $500,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $45 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, averaging $25,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring oversight, spending disclosure, funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34440, "no_votes": 22010, "total_votes": 56450, "percent_yes": 61.00974313551816, "percent_no": 38.99025686448184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes Redlands Unified School District to issue $500 million...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes Redlands Unified School District to issue $500 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom safety upgrades, infrastructure repairs, and modernization of career and science facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $45 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.541749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.044140", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1850, "fingerprint": "2024|202400684|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400684|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "54fe3325cef5c97c", "measure_id": "202400684", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve school safety and security systems, repair/replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, cooling/ electrical systems, remove asbestos/ lead pipes and upgrade, acquire, construct classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment to support college and career readiness in science, math, engineering, arts, and skilled trades, shall Rim of the World Unified School District's measure authorizing $71,000,000 bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($4,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8033, "no_votes": 5151, "total_votes": 13184, "percent_yes": 60.92991504854369, "percent_no": 39.07008495145631, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Rim of the World Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Rim of the World Unified School District to issue $71 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including safety systems, infrastructure repairs, asbestos and lead pipe removal, and construction of classrooms and equipment for college and career programs. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $4 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.542298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.044291", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1844, "fingerprint": "2024|202400678|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400678|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "78f28f57e9af52de", "measure_id": "202400678", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade Alta Loma School District classrooms, labs, and school facilities supporting student achievement in math, science, technology, arts, engineering; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, ventilation, electrical systems; update instructional technology; and improve school safety/ security, shall Alta Loma School District's measure be adopted authorizing $71,000,000 in bonds at legal rates (without increasing current tax rates), levying approximately 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($5,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14258, "no_votes": 12619, "total_votes": 26877, "percent_yes": 53.049075417643344, "percent_no": 46.950924582356656, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Alta Loma School District to issue $71...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Alta Loma School District to issue $71 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, labs, roofs, plumbing, ventilation, electrical systems, and safety features. The bonds would have been funded through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.538901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.043376", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1848, "fingerprint": "2024|202400682|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400682|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f3d39b953fb7478a", "measure_id": "202400682", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and improve aging neighborhood schools, improve fire safety/school security systems, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical and repair, construct and acquire classrooms, labs, sites, facilities and equipment to support student achievement in math, science, technology, arts, and engineering, shall Mountain View School District's School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 measure authorizing $56,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $26 per $100,000 assessed value (averaging $3,500,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, and all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4840, "no_votes": 2749, "total_votes": 7589, "percent_yes": 63.77651864540783, "percent_no": 36.22348135459217, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Mountain View School District's School Facilities...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Mountain View School District's School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 to issue $56 million in bonds to repair and improve school facilities, including fire safety systems, roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and classroom construction. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of $26 per $100,000 of assessed value, averaging $3.5 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.541186", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.043989", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1846, "fingerprint": "2024|202400680|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400680|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "627370601423ffb3", "measure_id": "202400680", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Fontana Unified School District's measure to expand facilities, career training education programs, labs, including robotics, coding and construction; increase Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Math classrooms; and ensure access for individuals with disabilities be adopted, authorizing $408 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $52 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $25 million annually), citizen oversight, and public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31780, "no_votes": 16064, "total_votes": 47844, "percent_yes": 66.42421202240615, "percent_no": 33.57578797759385, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Fontana Unified School District to issue $408 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Fontana Unified School District to issue $408 million in bonds to expand facilities, career training programs, STEM/arts classrooms, and accessibility improvements, funded through property taxes averaging below $52 per $100,000 of assessed valuation. The bonds will raise approximately $25 million annually and include provisions for audits, citizen oversight, and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.539980", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.043687", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1852, "fingerprint": "2024|202400686|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400686|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2d720a3929b919cf", "measure_id": "202400686", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of local schools, repair or replace leaky roofs; improve school safety and security; replace outdated plumbing, electrical, and sewer systems; renovate, upgrade, and construct science labs, classrooms, and restrooms; shall Snowline Joint Unified School District's measure authorizing $70,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, levying an average 4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, generating approximately $3,900,000 annually, with annual audits, independent oversight, NO funds for salaries, all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9031, "no_votes": 6490, "total_votes": 15521, "percent_yes": 58.18568391211907, "percent_no": 41.81431608788093, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Snowline Joint Unified School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Snowline Joint Unified School District to issue $70,600,000 in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including roof repairs, safety upgrades, and modernization of plumbing, electrical, and sewer systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of 4 cents per $100 of assessed property value, generating approximately $3,900,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.543361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.044605", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1830, "fingerprint": "2024|202400064|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400064|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1d82c903857ec5a3", "measure_id": "202400064", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to provide funding for San Bernardino County infrastructure and services, increasing the transient occupancy tax (paid by occupants of hotels/vacation rentals) to 11% providing approximately an additional $9,400,000 annually for general government use until ended by voters, with these funds continuing to be audited as part of the County's external independent annual audit , and providing that all funds be locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 299182, "no_votes": 389505, "total_votes": 688687, "percent_yes": 43.44237658036234, "percent_no": 56.55762341963766, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased San Bernardino County's transient occupancy...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased San Bernardino County's transient occupancy tax on hotel and vacation rental stays to 11%, generating approximately $9.4 million annually for general government infrastructure and services. The additional revenue would have been subject to annual audits and remained under local control until voters chose to end the tax.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.333777", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.945611", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1831, "fingerprint": "2024|202400065|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400065|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "65cc0b4c2d085053", "measure_id": "202400065", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the amendments to the San Bernardino County Charter regarding law enforcement staffing and community protection within the unincorporated areas of the County be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 417756, "no_votes": 263136, "total_votes": 680892, "percent_yes": 61.35422357730741, "percent_no": 38.64577642269259, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment modifies San Bernardino County's charter regarding law...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment modifies San Bernardino County's charter regarding law enforcement staffing levels and community protection services in unincorporated areas of the county. The measure passed with 60.6% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.334091", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.945765", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1837, "fingerprint": "2024|202400339|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400339|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f0a56d2227e7fecd", "measure_id": "202400339", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, funding general City of Grand Terrace services such as additional law enforcement services and for general government use by establishing a 1.00% sales tax providing approximately $1 million annually until ended by voters be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2533, "no_votes": 2728, "total_votes": 5261, "percent_yes": 48.14674016346702, "percent_no": 51.85325983653298, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a 1% sales tax in Grand Terrace to generat...", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a 1% sales tax in Grand Terrace to generate approximately $1 million annually for general city services including additional law enforcement, continuing until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.427707", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.989285", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1840, "fingerprint": "2024|202400342|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400342|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3ca4f4cb889fb4c9", "measure_id": "202400342", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure establishing a one-percent retail transactions and use (sales) tax, generating approximately $20,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, for general city services, such as the improvement and maintenance of infrastructure and provision of public safety services, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11908, "no_votes": 22307, "total_votes": 34215, "percent_yes": 34.80344877977495, "percent_no": 65.19655122022505, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a one-percent sales tax in San Bernardino ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a one-percent sales tax in San Bernardino to generate approximately $20 million annually for general city services including infrastructure improvements and public safety. The tax would have continued indefinitely until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.428559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.989736", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1838, "fingerprint": "2024|202400340|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400340|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "aadb30994c4c13fe", "measure_id": "202400340", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted approving an alternative square foot tax on persons actively engaged in the business of Cannabis Cultivation at a monthly tax rate of up to $1.75 per square foot of Cannabis Cultivation Area or a fraction thereof (adjusted annually for CPI, but in no case more than 5% or less than 2%, starting on January 1 on the first year the tax is implemented, and each year thereafter)?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 967, "no_votes": 356, "total_votes": 1323, "percent_yes": 73.09145880574452, "percent_no": 26.908541194255477, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.428001", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.989433", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1836, "fingerprint": "2024|202400337|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400337|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "82ef389e1b16df3d", "measure_id": "202400337", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure funding Town of Apple Valley services such as maintaining 911 response times, safe routes to schools programs; responding to property crime/thefts/burglaries; hiring/retaining sheriff's deputies; repairing streets/potholes; retaining/attracting local businesses; addressing homelessness; cleaning/maintaining public areas/parks; general town services; by establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $9,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits/public spending disclosure, all funds used locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19255, "no_votes": 10688, "total_votes": 29943, "percent_yes": 64.30551380957152, "percent_no": 35.69448619042848, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in the Town of Apple Valley to fu...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in the Town of Apple Valley to fund general municipal services including public safety, street maintenance, parks, and homelessness programs, generating approximately $9 million annually. The tax requires audits and public spending disclosure, with all funds designated for local use, and can only be ended by voter action.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.427112", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.988973", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1839, "fingerprint": "2024|202400341|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400341|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "9ba56bf43ae3880c", "measure_id": "202400341", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "In order to provide general city services, such as public safety, roads, and improvements to parks and open space, shall the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt an ordinance to increase its transient occupancy tax, a tax paid only by hotel and short term rental guests, from 10 percent to 12 percent until ended by voters, providing approximately $1,000,000 annually, subject to citizen oversight and City Council authority to reduce the tax if funds are unnecessary?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41741, "no_votes": 30538, "total_votes": 72279, "percent_yes": 57.74983051785443, "percent_no": 42.25016948214557, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Rancho Cucamonga's transient occupancy tax on hotel an...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Rancho Cucamonga's transient occupancy tax on hotel and short-term rental guests from 10 percent to 12 percent to fund general city services including public safety, roads, and park improvements. The tax increase is expected to generate approximately $1,000,000 annually and includes provisions for citizen oversight and City Council authority to reduce the tax if funds become unnecessary.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.428294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.989583", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1835, "fingerprint": "2024|202400336|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400336|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1ee968552a1c23fc", "measure_id": "202400336", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Adelanto update its 1988 Flat Rate Business License Tax; this updated rate will be paid by local employers, based on the size of the business' annual sales (ranging from 0.125% to 0.40%); this will enable larger companies to pay their fair share of city services; this update will directly benefit the City General Fund by approximately $1.2 million annually, should this be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4747, "no_votes": 2687, "total_votes": 7434, "percent_yes": 63.855259617971484, "percent_no": 36.144740382028516, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure updates Adelanto's 1988 flat rate business license tax to a grad...", "summary_text": "This measure updates Adelanto's 1988 flat rate business license tax to a graduated rate system based on annual sales, ranging from 0.125% to 0.40%. The updated tax structure is projected to generate approximately $1.2 million annually for the city's general fund.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.426835", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.988824", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11007, "fingerprint": "2024|202400344|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400344|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d5f7d81031743420", "measure_id": "202400344", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure R1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Matt Garner be recalled (removed) from the officeof Council member of District 1 of the City of Yucaipa?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3527, "no_votes": 1839, "total_votes": 5366, "percent_yes": 65.7286619455833, "percent_no": 34.2713380544167, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to remove Matt Garner from his position as ...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to remove Matt Garner from his position as District 1 Council member for the City of Yucaipa. The recall passed, resulting in Garner's removal from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.137789", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.429230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.990198", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure R1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1841, "fingerprint": "2024|202400343|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400343|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ecaac7e82ebab68b", "measure_id": "202400343", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "City of Yucaipa Public Safety/Essential Services Protection Measure; to prevent reducing police officers/firefighters/paramedics/fire stations, and to maintain other essential services, including 911 response, property crime/gang prevention, senior/youth/afterschool programs, homelessness prevention, street/pothole repair, and for general government use, shall a measure establishing a 1\u00a2 transactions and use (sales) tax providing approximately $6,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring oversight, independent audits, spending disclosure, local control of all funds, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15260, "no_votes": 10155, "total_votes": 25415, "percent_yes": 60.04328152665749, "percent_no": 39.95671847334251, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Yucaipa to fund public safety ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Yucaipa to fund public safety services, infrastructure maintenance, and various community programs, generating approximately $6 million annually. The tax continues indefinitely until voters choose to end it and includes requirements for oversight, audits, and spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.428928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.989946", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11006, "fingerprint": "2024|202400338|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400338|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "fe107801e85d4139", "measure_id": "202400338", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure providing funding for the City of Fontana's general government use, such as maintaining 911 response, fire/police protection; recruiting/retaining well-trained police officers; helping prevent property crimes/thefts/burglaries; keeping public areas/parks safe/clean; addressing homelessness; protecting local drinking water sources; repairing streets/potholes by establishing a 1% sales tax providing approximately $46,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, spending disclosure, all funds locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34242, "no_votes": 32237, "total_votes": 66479, "percent_yes": 51.50799500594173, "percent_no": 48.49200499405827, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1% sales tax in Fontana that would generate approx...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1% sales tax in Fontana that would generate approximately $46 million annually for general government services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and homeless services. The tax would remain in effect until ended by voters and includes requirements for audits and spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.136603", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.427407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.989131", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1834, "fingerprint": "2024|202400335|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400335|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1445e4e93bcdffb8", "measure_id": "202400335", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of Colton City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2319, "no_votes": 2362, "total_votes": 4681, "percent_yes": 49.54069643238624, "percent_no": 50.45930356761376, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.426539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.988674", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1832, "fingerprint": "2024|202400333|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400333|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "78b057661c133a50", "measure_id": "202400333", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Adelanto's measure to fund public safety, parks/recreation programs, capital improvements such as roadway projects, and illegal dumping enforcement, approving a vacant parcel tax that only applies to vacant land and does not apply to occupied residential properties or operating business properties, at rates based on zoning ranging from $50.00 to $600.00/acre annually for 20 years raising about $6,200,000/year that includes citizen oversight, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 825, "no_votes": 1534, "total_votes": 2359, "percent_yes": 34.97244595167444, "percent_no": 65.02755404832556, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed an annual tax on vacant land parcels in Adelan...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed an annual tax on vacant land parcels in Adelanto ranging from $50 to $600 per acre based on zoning, exempting occupied residential and operating business properties, to raise approximately $6.2 million yearly for 20 years. The funds would have supported public safety, parks and recreation programs, capital improvements including roadway projects, and illegal dumping enforcement with citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.425962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.988360", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1833, "fingerprint": "2024|202400334|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400334|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "0d90f97c6d713a67", "measure_id": "202400334", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure providing Chino funding for general government use, such as maintaining 911 response, police/fireprotection; recruiting/retaining well-trained police officers; preventing crime; repairing streets/potholes; protecting local drinking water sources; addressing homelessness; maintaining veterans/senior/youth/after-school programs by enacting a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $28,000,000 annually untilended by voters; requiring audits/publicspending disclosure/all funds benefitting Chino residents, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8385, "no_votes": 5550, "total_votes": 13935, "percent_yes": 60.17222820236814, "percent_no": 39.82777179763186, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 1-cent sales tax in Chino, California to generate appr...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 1-cent sales tax in Chino, California to generate approximately $28 million annually for general government services including public safety, street repairs, and various community programs. The measure requires audits and public spending disclosure, with the tax continuing until ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.426239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.988511", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1854, "fingerprint": "2024|202400688|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400688|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b15fc0fbee38fbfb", "measure_id": "202400688", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To retain quality teachers, ensure healthy/safe classrooms by: removing asbestos, mold, lead paint; providing safe drinking water; repairing leaky roofs, gas lines; upgrading 911 systems, vocational/career classrooms/labs, shall Victor Valley Union High School District's measure authorizing $180,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $23 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $10,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring oversight, public sp_endin\udbc0\udc6a disclosure, all funds be spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31311, "no_votes": 14582, "total_votes": 45893, "percent_yes": 68.22609112500817, "percent_no": 31.773908874991832, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Victor Valley Union High School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Victor Valley Union High School District to issue $180 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including asbestos removal, roof repairs, drinking water safety upgrades, and vocational classroom enhancements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $23 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating approximately $10 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.544555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.044917", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1842, "fingerprint": "2024|202400345|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400345|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d3c00130f57ea21a", "measure_id": "202400345", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prevent reducing police officers/firefighters/paramedics/fire stations, and to maintain other essential services, including 911 response, property crime/gang prevention, senior/youth/afterschool programs, homelessness prevention, street/pothole repair, and for general government use, shall a measure establishing a 1\u00a2 transactions and use (sales) tax providing approximately $6,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring oversight, independent audits, spending disclosure, local control of all funds, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7130, "no_votes": 1444, "total_votes": 8574, "percent_yes": 83.15838581758806, "percent_no": 16.841614182411945, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in San Bernardino that would gene...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in San Bernardino that would generate approximately $6 million annually to fund police, fire, paramedic services, and other city services including street repairs and social programs. The tax would remain in effect until ended by voters and includes requirements for oversight, audits, and spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.429513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.990386", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1843, "fingerprint": "2024|202400346|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400346|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "78dea8f11bdff5a9", "measure_id": "202400346", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue the approximately 50% per year reduction in sewer assessments charger to pay for the sewer system that ensures a safe, clean, reliable water supply, shall the Town of Yucca Valley's existing 1/2 cent sales tax measure generating approximately 3 million dollars annually be adopted and reauthorized at the current rate (no increase) for 10 years, with audits, oversight, and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6994, "no_votes": 1515, "total_votes": 8509, "percent_yes": 82.19532259960042, "percent_no": 17.804677400399584, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Wastewater/Sewage", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure reauthorizes Yucca Valley's existing 0", "summary_text": "The measure reauthorizes Yucca Valley's existing 0.5% sales tax for 10 years at the current rate to continue funding the sewer system and reducing sewer assessments by approximately 50% annually. The tax generates approximately $3 million per year with local oversight and auditing requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.429779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.990550", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11008, "fingerprint": "2024|202400350|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400350|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "748779fb4e1e59ac", "measure_id": "202400350", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Municipal Code be amended to comply with the City Council compensation formula under Government Code Section 36516 to: (i) ensure the salary of Councilmembers is set and strictly limited by State law, commencing at $950/month; and (ii) authorize the salary of Councilmembers to be adjusted within the limits of State law by ordinance considered publicly during at least two City Council meetings?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1652, "no_votes": 842, "total_votes": 2494, "percent_yes": 66.23897353648756, "percent_no": 33.76102646351244, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended San Diego's Municipal Code to set City Council member sa...", "summary_text": "This measure amended San Diego's Municipal Code to set City Council member salaries at $950 per month in compliance with state law and established a process allowing salary adjustments within state limits through ordinances considered at two public City Council meetings.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.141361", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.431005", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.991180", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1857, "fingerprint": "2024|202400347|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400347|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "da0e83165e355862", "measure_id": "202400347", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Charter section 40 be amended and section 40.2 be added to authorize the City Auditor and Audit Committee to use outside legal counsel instead of the elected City Attorney, subject to certain conditions, when the Audit Committee determines such use is in the public interest?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 172751, "no_votes": 84150, "total_votes": 256901, "percent_yes": 67.24419134219019, "percent_no": 32.75580865780981, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends San Diego's city charter to allow the City Auditor and Au...", "summary_text": "This measure amends San Diego's city charter to allow the City Auditor and Audit Committee to hire outside legal counsel instead of using the elected City Attorney when the Audit Committee determines it serves the public interest, subject to specified conditions.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.430071", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.990701", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1876, "fingerprint": "2024|202400693|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400693|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f9065b1d2a80d76b", "measure_id": "202400693", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Chula Vista Elementary School District\u2019s measure to upgrade emergency communications and security systems; repair deteriorating roofs; ensure accessibility for the disabled; and renovate aging playground equipment and existing classrooms be adopted, authorizing $360 million of bonds levying approximately $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $22 million annually) while outstanding, with legal rates, independent oversight, eligibility for State matching funds and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76517, "no_votes": 47459, "total_votes": 123976, "percent_yes": 61.719203716848426, "percent_no": 38.280796283151574, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Chula Vista Elementary School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Chula Vista Elementary School District to issue $360 million in bonds to fund infrastructure improvements including emergency communications, security systems, roof repairs, accessibility upgrades, playground renovations, and classroom updates. The bonds are funded through property taxes at approximately $29 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.547408", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.045749", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11010, "fingerprint": "2024|202400689|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400689|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5cad5d270ccd2c36", "measure_id": "202400689", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair, replace, or reconstruct deteriorating classrooms, science labs, and school facilities at Mountain Empire High School that don\u2019t meet building safety/earthquake safety standards; replace/fix roofs, plumbing, sewer, electrical, and aging portables; and improve school safety/security systems, shall Mountain Empire Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $20,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, be adopted, levying approximately $40 per $100,000 of assessed value (averaging $1,253,097 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1533, "no_votes": 1616, "total_votes": 3149, "percent_yes": 48.68212130835185, "percent_no": 51.31787869164815, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Mountain Empire Unified School Distric...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Mountain Empire Unified School District to issue $20 million in bonds to repair and upgrade facilities at Mountain Empire High School, including classrooms, science labs, roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and safety features. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $40 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.144197", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.545092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.045084", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1858, "fingerprint": "2024|202400348|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400348|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3f51d681082c0cba", "measure_id": "202400348", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the voters of the City of Carlsbad adopt the measure amending the city charter and municipal code to: (1) increase the expenditure limit for using city funds to acquire or improve real property from $1 million (the limit established by voters in 1982) to $3.09 million (the 1982 limit in today\u2019s dollars); (2) adjust the limit annually on January 1 by the percentage increase in the regional construction cost index; and (3) exempt public safety facilities from the limit?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32759, "no_votes": 28981, "total_votes": 61740, "percent_yes": 53.05960479429868, "percent_no": 46.94039520570132, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Budget Processes", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Carlsbad's expenditure limit for acquiring or improvin...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Carlsbad's expenditure limit for acquiring or improving real property from $1 million to $3.09 million, adjusts the limit annually based on construction cost increases, and exempts public safety facilities from the spending limit. The change updates a limit that was originally set by voters in 1982 to account for inflation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.430397", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.990852", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1879, "fingerprint": "2024|202400696|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400696|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6afecf8bb46948bf", "measure_id": "202400696", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update local high school facilities, repair, construct/improve classrooms, science labs, instructional technology, career-training/school facilities to support college/career readiness in math, science, engineering, technology, arts, and skilled trades; replace aging roofs, plumbing, electrical systems; improve safety access for all students; shall Fallbrook Union High School District\u2019s measure authorizing $56,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $24 per $100,000 assessed value ($3,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10761, "no_votes": 10870, "total_votes": 21631, "percent_yes": 49.748046784707135, "percent_no": 50.251953215292865, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Fallbrook Union High School District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Fallbrook Union High School District to issue $56 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom repairs and construction, upgraded science labs and technology, infrastructure replacements, and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of $24 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.549787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.046245", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11009, "fingerprint": "2024|202400360|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400360|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f10d352c36bf118a", "measure_id": "202400360", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Charter section 66 be amended to eliminate the primary election when two or fewer candidates for particular seat for the Board of Education of the San Diego Unified School District, including write- in candidates, qualify for the primary election, with the qualifying candidates automatically moving forward to the general election?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 264086, "no_votes": 127314, "total_votes": 391400, "percent_yes": 67.4721512519162, "percent_no": 32.5278487480838, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment eliminates primary elections for San Diego Unified Sch...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment eliminates primary elections for San Diego Unified School District Board of Education seats when two or fewer candidates qualify, allowing those candidates to proceed directly to the general election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.143248", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.434058", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.992764", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1855, "fingerprint": "2024|202400066|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400066|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "14c83a8f2561aade", "measure_id": "202400066", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Rincon Ranch Community Services District be authorized to establish and levy a Special Tax Override, on all taxable real property within its boundaries for the purpose of providing funds for repair and resurface of the roads maintained by the District, with this Special Tax not to exceed ten dollars per acre, or portion thereof, plus two hundred fifty dollars per parcel of land per year?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38, "no_votes": 19, "total_votes": 57, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorizes the Rincon Ranch Community Services District t...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorizes the Rincon Ranch Community Services District to impose a special tax on real property within its boundaries to fund road repair and resurfacing, with the tax capped at $10 per acre plus $250 per parcel annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.334507", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.945918", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1880, "fingerprint": "2024|202400697|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400697|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d0e31f1cf8d81836", "measure_id": "202400697", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Lemon Grove School District\u2019s measure to ensure disabled access and expand science, technology, coding, robotics, engineering, arts, and math classrooms and labs be adopted, authorizing $30 million of bonds with legal rates, average levies below $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (generating $1.8 million annually) while outstanding, citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrator salaries and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8445, "no_votes": 5058, "total_votes": 13503, "percent_yes": 62.54165740946457, "percent_no": 37.45834259053543, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Lemon Grove School District to issue $30 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Lemon Grove School District to issue $30 million in bonds to fund accessibility improvements and expand STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and math) classrooms and laboratories. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging below $25 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.550349", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.046406", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1869, "fingerprint": "2024|202400361|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400361|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1ad7be3b3ef22ffa", "measure_id": "202400361", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Charter section 41.3 be added so the Ethics Commission, which regulates City officials, candidates for City office, lobbyists, and consultants, can be eliminated only by voters, appoints its own Executive Director without Council confirmation, independently initiates its own investigations and law enforcement referrals, has defined qualifications and term limits, and is provided sufficient resources?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 375039, "no_votes": 143549, "total_votes": 518588, "percent_yes": 72.31925921926462, "percent_no": 27.680740780735377, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adds a new Charter section that strengthens the independence of ...", "summary_text": "This measure adds a new Charter section that strengthens the independence of San Diego's Ethics Commission by requiring voter approval for its elimination, allowing it to appoint its own Executive Director without City Council confirmation, and enabling it to independently initiate investigations and law enforcement referrals. The amendment also establishes defined qualifications and term limits for Ethics Commission members and requires the city to provide sufficient resources for the commission's operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.434351", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.992913", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1870, "fingerprint": "2024|202400362|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400362|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "19d4552e2d3a3cb0", "measure_id": "202400362", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To invest in neighborhood upgrades which can include fixing potholes, repairing streets, sidewalks, and streetlights, improving parks and libraries, updating police, fire, paramedic, and 9-1-1 response, and providing infrastructure and delivering general services across San Diego neighborhoods, shall the measure enacting a one-cent sales tax be adopted, generating approximately $400,000,000 per year until ended by voters, requiring citizen oversight and independent audits, with all funds staying in the City of San Diego?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 284940, "no_votes": 288446, "total_votes": 573386, "percent_yes": 49.69427227033796, "percent_no": 50.30572772966204, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have enacted a one-cent sales tax in San Diego to generate...", "summary_text": "This measure would have enacted a one-cent sales tax in San Diego to generate approximately $400 million annually for neighborhood infrastructure improvements, public safety services, parks, libraries, and general city services. The tax would have remained in effect until repealed by voters and included provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.434668", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.993064", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1881, "fingerprint": "2024|202400698|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400698|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7693db2fd01923bd", "measure_id": "202400698", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure EE", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Lemon Grove School District\u2019s measure to replace leaky roofs and plumbing; update aging electrical and inefficient heating and cooling systems; and improve security systems be adopted, authorizing $30 million of bonds with legal rates, average levies below $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (generating $1.8 million annually) while outstanding, citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrator salaries and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8743, "no_votes": 4814, "total_votes": 13557, "percent_yes": 64.4906690270709, "percent_no": 35.50933097292911, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Lemon Grove School District to issue $30 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Lemon Grove School District to issue $30 million in bonds to fund infrastructure improvements including roof and plumbing repairs, electrical and HVAC system updates, and security system enhancements. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging below $25 per $100,000 of assessed property value and include provisions for citizen oversight and spending audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.551159", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.046566", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure EE", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1856, "fingerprint": "2024|202400067|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400067|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "31c769acec36c79f", "measure_id": "202400067", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade roads, bridges, storm drains, rail lines, and prevent railway bluff collapse; reduce traffic congestion; improve pedestrian, bicyclist, and driver safety; improve public transit; protect wildlife habitat/air quality; and fill potholes; shall the measure authorizing a half-cent sales tax raising $350,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring citizen oversight, public spending disclosure, and independent annual audits be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 688922, "no_votes": 701639, "total_votes": 1390561, "percent_yes": 49.54273850625754, "percent_no": 50.45726149374246, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.334859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.946070", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1882, "fingerprint": "2024|202400699|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400699|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "012f2921cf9c761f", "measure_id": "202400699", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure GG", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Ramona Unified School District\u2019s measure to improve career, college preparation and vocational education facilities; repair leaky roofs and plumbing; update emergency communication/fire alarm systems; and replace deteriorating portable classrooms be adopted, authorizing $26.7 million of bonds with audits, legal rates, average levies of $59 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (generating $4.3 million annually) while outstanding, independent oversight and public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8460, "no_votes": 10139, "total_votes": 18599, "percent_yes": 45.486316468627344, "percent_no": 54.513683531372656, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized $26", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized $26.7 million in bonds for Ramona Unified School District to repair facilities, update safety systems, replace portable classrooms, and improve career and college preparation facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments averaging $59 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.551936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.046730", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure GG", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1868, "fingerprint": "2024|202400359|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400359|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "dd478ac3ee6ad06a", "measure_id": "202400359", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Do you approve an amendment to The Farm in Poway Specific Plan to allow development of 30,500 square-foot recreational fitness club with outdoor fitness uses, lighted recreational courts, swimming pools, caf\u00e9 with bar, a day spa/retail, on 6.87 acres located in The Farm in Poway Specific Plan area (APN 273-932-25-00) in the City of Poway?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8163, "no_votes": 17880, "total_votes": 26043, "percent_yes": 31.344315171063243, "percent_no": 68.65568482893676, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.433767", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.992604", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1883, "fingerprint": "2024|202400700|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400700|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "eee225653008e11b", "measure_id": "202400700", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure HH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall San Diego Community College District\u2019s measure to: \u2022 Repair classrooms \u2022 Protect college affordability \u2022 Prepare students for careers including nursing, firefighting, science, engineering \u2022 Repair deteriorating roofs, electrical/gas lines \u2022 Ensure safe drinking water \u2022 Remove lead paint, asbestos \u2022 Improve veteran/homeless student resources be adopted authorizing $3.5 billion in bonds at legal rates, averaging 2.5\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation (generating $168 million annually while bonds are outstanding) with oversight, spending disclosures, funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 256983, "no_votes": 166782, "total_votes": 423765, "percent_yes": 60.64280910410251, "percent_no": 39.35719089589749, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Diego Community College District to issue $3", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Diego Community College District to issue $3.5 billion in bonds to fund facility repairs, safety improvements, and upgrades to classrooms and infrastructure across the district's colleges. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed property value, generating approximately $168 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.552560", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.046922", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure HH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1863, "fingerprint": "2024|202400354|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400354|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d4b88cdd923e520f", "measure_id": "202400354", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding for essential services in Escondido, such as providing public safety; addressing homelessness; improving streets, sidewalks and infrastructure; increasing police, fire and paramedic services; reducing traffic congestion; and maintaining parks, trails and open space, shall the Escondido Community Investment Measure establishing a local one-cent sales tax providing approximately twenty-eight million dollars annually for twenty years be adopted, for general government use, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money staying in Escondido?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32802, "no_votes": 20863, "total_votes": 53665, "percent_yes": 61.12363738004286, "percent_no": 38.87636261995714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a one-cent local sales tax in Escondido for twenty y...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a one-cent local sales tax in Escondido for twenty years, generating approximately $28 million annually for general government services including public safety, infrastructure, homelessness programs, and parks maintenance. The measure includes provisions for independent audits and citizen oversight, with all revenue required to stay within Escondido.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.432192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.991829", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1861, "fingerprint": "2024|202400352|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400352|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "237dddc3ffb62380", "measure_id": "202400352", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prevent substantial cuts to: The number of firefighters/paramedics; The number of police officers (including patrol, crime prevention, and homeless enforcement); Street maintenance (for example, pothole repair and repaving); and Other essential City services; Shall the City continue the \u00bd cent sales tax approved by the voters in 2008, for an additional 20 years, with oversight from a Citizens\u2019 Committee?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22631, "no_votes": 10663, "total_votes": 33294, "percent_yes": 67.97320838589536, "percent_no": 32.02679161410464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends San Diego's existing half-cent sales tax for an addition...", "summary_text": "This measure extends San Diego's existing half-cent sales tax for an additional 20 years to fund general city services including fire, police, street maintenance, and other municipal operations. The tax was originally approved by voters in 2008 and would continue with citizen oversight committee monitoring.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.431615", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.991491", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1884, "fingerprint": "2024|202400701|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400701|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "03956186950a54d2", "measure_id": "202400701", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure JJ", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade older schools, remove asbestos, lead pipes, mold; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewer, and electrical; support college/ career readiness in math, science, engineering, technology, arts, and skilled trades; by modernizing classrooms, science labs, school facilities, and technology, shall San Marcos Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $324 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 4 cents per $100 assessed value ($20 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32919, "no_votes": 24064, "total_votes": 56983, "percent_yes": 57.769861186669715, "percent_no": 42.230138813330285, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Marcos Unified School District to issue $324 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Marcos Unified School District to issue $324 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including removing hazardous materials, fixing infrastructure, and modernizing classrooms and labs. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 4 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.553241", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.047086", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure JJ", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1862, "fingerprint": "2024|202400353|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400353|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a01a7ef8b8aa00ed", "measure_id": "202400353", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide locally-controlled funding for Encinitas city services, such as keeping parks, beaches, public facilities safe and clean; keeping trash/pollution away from lagoons, waterways, beaches, marine habitat by repairing aging storm drains; restoring beach sand; fixing potholes; maintaining streets; improving traffic safety, infrastructure, and public safety facilities; shall Encinitas\u2019 measure establishing a one cent (1%) transactions and use (sales) tax, providing $15.4 million annually for general revenue purposes for 10 years, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17492, "no_votes": 18884, "total_votes": 36376, "percent_yes": 48.0866505388168, "percent_no": 51.9133494611832, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.431923", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.991661", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1885, "fingerprint": "2024|202400702|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400702|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "52c1171ae0f786aa", "measure_id": "202400702", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure KK", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall San Ysidro School District\u2019s measure to replace leaky roofs and plumbing; upgrade aging electrical, heating and air-conditioning; improve classroom technology at Ocean View Hills Elementary and Vista Del Mar Middle Schools; and construct new educational facilities be adopted, authorizing $68.5 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, levies below $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding (raising $4,450,000 annually), citizen oversight, and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3554, "no_votes": 2007, "total_votes": 5561, "percent_yes": 63.90936881855781, "percent_no": 36.09063118144219, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Ysidro School District to issue $68", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Ysidro School District to issue $68.5 million in bonds to replace infrastructure like roofs and plumbing, upgrade electrical and HVAC systems, improve classroom technology at two schools, and construct new educational facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of less than $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $4.45 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.553809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.047247", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure KK", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1864, "fingerprint": "2024|202400355|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400355|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ae8228d44d5cfe80", "measure_id": "202400355", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue funding for La Mesa city services, such as keeping parks/recreation/ community facilities safe, clean and well maintained; fixing potholes/ maintaining streets; and providing rapid 9-1-1 emergency response/ fire protection/ paramedics/ crime prevention, shall the ordinance renewing City of La Mesa\u2019s existing \u00be% sales tax be adopted at the current rate (no increase), continuing $12,000,000 annually for 20 years, with independent oversight, audits, and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23073, "no_votes": 5284, "total_votes": 28357, "percent_yes": 81.36615297810064, "percent_no": 18.633847021899356, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure renews La Mesa's existing 0", "summary_text": "The measure renews La Mesa's existing 0.75% sales tax at the current rate for 20 years, generating approximately $12 million annually for city services including parks, street maintenance, and emergency services. The measure includes provisions for independent oversight and audits, with all funds remaining under local control.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.432498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.991981", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1886, "fingerprint": "2024|202400703|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400703|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ce9fa97403a304be", "measure_id": "202400703", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure LL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall San Ysidro School District\u2019s measure to improve student safety and school security; upgrade emergency communications; construct classrooms at Ocean View Hills Elementary and Vista Del Mar Middle Schools; and construct new educational facilities be adopted, authorizing $66.5 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, levies below $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding (raising $4,350,000 annually), citizen oversight and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3537, "no_votes": 2045, "total_votes": 5582, "percent_yes": 63.364385524901465, "percent_no": 36.635614475098535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the San Ysidro School District to issue $66", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the San Ysidro School District to issue $66.5 million in bonds to improve student safety and school security, upgrade emergency communications, and construct new classrooms and educational facilities at Ocean View Hills Elementary and Vista Del Mar Middle Schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies below $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding, raising approximately $4.35 million annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.554935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.047408", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure LL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1860, "fingerprint": "2024|202400351|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400351|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "190bfd6e9c14b251", "measure_id": "202400351", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain City services impacted by tourism (public safety, streets, beaches, parks, trails), shall the Del Mar Municipal Code be updated to require TOT from guests of all short-term vacation rentals (30 days or less), hotels, and similar facilities \u2013 regardless of unit/bedroom count \u2013 on rent charged (excluding third-party booking fees), and allow online booking vendors to collect/remit TOT to City of Del Mar, generating approximately $775,000 annually in local revenue, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1866, "no_votes": 743, "total_votes": 2609, "percent_yes": 71.52165580682254, "percent_no": 28.478344193177463, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure updates Del Mar's Municipal Code to require transient occupancy ...", "summary_text": "This measure updates Del Mar's Municipal Code to require transient occupancy tax (TOT) from guests of all short-term vacation rentals of 30 days or less, hotels, and similar facilities regardless of size, and allows online booking platforms to collect and remit the tax directly to the city. The measure is estimated to generate approximately $775,000 annually in local revenue to fund city services affected by tourism.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.431311", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.991327", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1887, "fingerprint": "2024|202400704|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400704|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d9002e1f56dd52df", "measure_id": "202400704", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure MM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall San Ysidro School District\u2019s measure to improve school safety; replace roofs, electrical, plumbing, heating and air-conditioning systems; add new classrooms; and repair aging restrooms at La Mirada, Smythe, Sunset, and Willow Elementary Schools, San Ysidro Middle School, and Preschool & Child Development Center be adopted, authorizing $12,900,000 of bonds with average levies below $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding (raising $830,000 annually), with legal rates, audits, citizen oversight and public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4977, "no_votes": 1408, "total_votes": 6385, "percent_yes": 77.94831636648395, "percent_no": 22.05168363351605, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Ysidro School District to issue $12,900,000 i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Ysidro School District to issue $12,900,000 in bonds to fund safety improvements, infrastructure repairs (roofs, electrical, plumbing, HVAC), classroom additions, and restroom repairs at six school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging below $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.555683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.047572", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure MM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1888, "fingerprint": "2024|202400705|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400705|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "be4826c54c4de133", "measure_id": "202400705", "measure_letter": "NN", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure NN", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Santee School District\u2019s measure to replace leaky pipes and plumbing; repair inefficient heating and air-conditioning; update emergency communications; and improve school security be adopted, authorizing $30.62 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $12 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $1.8 million annually while outstanding), citizen oversight, full public disclosure of all spending and no estimated increase in current tax rates?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15580, "no_votes": 14167, "total_votes": 29747, "percent_yes": 52.3750294147309, "percent_no": 47.6249705852691, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Santee School District to issue $30", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Santee School District to issue $30.62 million in bonds to fund infrastructure repairs including plumbing, heating and air-conditioning systems, emergency communications, and school security improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments averaging below $12 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.556155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.047738", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure NN", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1859, "fingerprint": "2024|202400349|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400349|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9e3dabb3503f45dc", "measure_id": "202400349", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to continue funding City of Chula Vista services including fixing potholes; keeping streets, sidewalks, infrastructure, parks, public facilities safe, clean, well-maintained; repairing aging storm drains; managing traffic congestion; and removing trash/graffiti from public spaces, by renewing City of Chula Vista\u2019s half-cent transactions and use tax at the current rate (no increase), continuing an estimated $37,000,000 annually for general government use for 10 years, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 81009, "no_votes": 29361, "total_votes": 110370, "percent_yes": 73.39766240826312, "percent_no": 26.602337591736884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would renew Chula Vista's existing half-cent sales tax for 10 ye...", "summary_text": "This measure would renew Chula Vista's existing half-cent sales tax for 10 years at the current rate, generating approximately $37 million annually for general city services including infrastructure maintenance, parks, and public facilities. The renewed tax would include citizen oversight and independent audits with all revenue staying within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.430706", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.991015", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1889, "fingerprint": "2024|202400706|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400706|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d11da94f68da0a5e", "measure_id": "202400706", "measure_letter": "PP", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure PP", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall South Bay Union School District\u2019s measure to ensure disabled access; expand Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math classrooms; and upgrade emergency communications and security systems be adopted, authorizing $67 million of bonds with legal rates, estimated levies below $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (raising $3.7 million annually), independent citizen oversight and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16034, "no_votes": 8259, "total_votes": 24293, "percent_yes": 66.0025521755238, "percent_no": 33.9974478244762, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the South Bay Union School District to issue $67 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the South Bay Union School District to issue $67 million in bonds to improve accessibility for disabled students, expand STEM and arts classrooms, and upgrade emergency communications and security systems. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies estimated at less than $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value, raising approximately $3.7 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.556942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.047901", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure PP", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1871, "fingerprint": "2024|202400363|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400363|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "193b7ddc1197fab9", "measure_id": "202400363", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding for San Marcos city services, such as fixing potholes, maintaining streets/public infrastructure; reducing traffic congestion; keeping local parks, trails, playgrounds and community facilities safe, and well-maintained; providing fire protection, paramedic, crime prevention, and 911 emergency response; shall the City of San Marcos measure establishing a 1 cent sales tax be adopted, providing approximately $20,000,000 annually for general government use for 10 years, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24411, "no_votes": 15977, "total_votes": 40388, "percent_yes": 60.44122016440527, "percent_no": 39.55877983559473, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in San Marcos for 10 years to gen...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in San Marcos for 10 years to generate approximately $20 million annually for general city services including infrastructure maintenance, parks, emergency services, and public safety. The measure includes provisions for citizen oversight, independent audits, and local control of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.434986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.993216", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1890, "fingerprint": "2024|202400707|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400707|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "17304af159480986", "measure_id": "202400707", "measure_letter": "QQ", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure QQ", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair local schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall South Bay Union School District\u2019s measure to replace leaky pipes and plumbing; repair classrooms; and upgrade aging electrical/ air-conditioning systems be adopted, authorizing $58 million of bonds with legal rates, estimated levies below $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (raising $3.8 million annually), annual audits, independent citizen oversight and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16523, "no_votes": 7906, "total_votes": 24429, "percent_yes": 67.63682508494003, "percent_no": 32.36317491505997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the South Bay Union School District to issue $58 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the South Bay Union School District to issue $58 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school infrastructure including plumbing, classrooms, electrical systems, and air conditioning. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies estimated at less than $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.557570", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.048062", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure QQ", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1866, "fingerprint": "2024|202400357|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400357|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e4a630baad302491", "measure_id": "202400357", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Measure adding a Special Parcel Tax in the City of National City to be used for street and park purposes, with rates based on the character of the property and exempting certain types of properties to be collected beginning in 2025, and continuing until repealed by the voters, with an oversight committee, generating an estimated $1.7 million dollars annually, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5192, "no_votes": 10145, "total_votes": 15337, "percent_yes": 33.85277433657169, "percent_no": 66.14722566342832, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Maintenance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a special parcel tax in National City to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a special parcel tax in National City to fund street and park maintenance and improvements, with tax rates varying by property type and certain exemptions, generating approximately $1.7 million annually starting in 2025. The tax would have continued indefinitely until voters chose to repeal it, with oversight provided by a designated committee.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.433107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.992295", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1892, "fingerprint": "2024|202400709|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400709|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "de0db40292daa5c2", "measure_id": "202400709", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure RR", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade schools, including vocational/career, science, engineering classrooms/labs, technology; improve safety/security, emergency communications systems; remove asbestos/lead paint/mold; provide safe drinking water; repair gas/sewer lines, restrooms; shall Sweetwater Union High School District\u2019s measure authorizing $647,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $42,600,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring public spending disclosure, oversight, all funds used locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107629, "no_votes": 68400, "total_votes": 176029, "percent_yes": 61.14276624874311, "percent_no": 38.85723375125689, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Sweetwater Union High School District to issue $6...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Sweetwater Union High School District to issue $647 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, labs, safety systems, and infrastructure improvements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $42.6 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.558649", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.048375", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure RR", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1872, "fingerprint": "2024|202400364|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400364|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "28184ae2ce496a93", "measure_id": "202400364", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the Santee Municipal Code to enact a half cent sales tax for fifteen years to support fire protection and emergency response facilities and services in the City of Santee, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13675, "no_votes": 14992, "total_votes": 28667, "percent_yes": 47.702933686817595, "percent_no": 52.297066313182405, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.435270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.993370", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1893, "fingerprint": "2024|202400710|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400710|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f6236840b987d2da", "measure_id": "202400710", "measure_letter": "SS", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure SS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Valley Center- Pauma Unified School District\u2019s measure to expand career and technical education training facilities; renovate and modernize Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics classrooms and labs; and improve safety and security be adopted, authorizing $84.6 million of bonds with average levies below $54 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $5.4 million annually) while outstanding, legal rates, independent audits, citizen oversight, and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6422, "no_votes": 7243, "total_votes": 13665, "percent_yes": 46.99597511891694, "percent_no": 53.00402488108306, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Valley Center-Pauma Unified School Dist...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Valley Center-Pauma Unified School District to issue $84.6 million in bonds to expand career and technical education facilities, renovate STEM classrooms and labs, and improve safety and security. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies averaging below $54 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.558970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.048539", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure SS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1891, "fingerprint": "2024|202400708|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400708|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "798ab5fc07ba746c", "measure_id": "202400708", "measure_letter": "SW", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure SW", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prepare students/veterans for jobs; upgrade vocational/career classrooms, labs/technology/equipment to train local nurses, firefighters/paramedics/other occupations; remove lead pipes/asbestos; repair deteriorating gas/sewer lines; shall Southwestern Community College District issue $800,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating $51,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, public oversight/spending disclosure, all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108970, "no_votes": 75636, "total_votes": 184606, "percent_yes": 59.02841727787829, "percent_no": 40.97158272212171, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Southwestern Community College District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Southwestern Community College District to issue $800 million in bonds to upgrade vocational and career training facilities, remove hazardous materials like lead pipes and asbestos, and repair infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $51 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.558218", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.048223", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure SW", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1865, "fingerprint": "2024|202400356|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400356|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "48c891e6360798d4", "measure_id": "202400356", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding for city services in Lemon Grove, such as keeping local streets, sidewalks, stormdrains, parks, community facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained; fixing potholes; providing fire protection, paramedic, police, and 911 emergency response; traffic management; addressing homelessness; and removing graffiti/trash; Shall City of Lemon Grove's ordinance establishing a one-cent sales tax be adopted, providing $5,957,000 annually for 10 years, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7503, "no_votes": 2977, "total_votes": 10480, "percent_yes": 71.59351145038167, "percent_no": 28.40648854961833, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a one-cent sales tax in Lemon Grove for 10 years to ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a one-cent sales tax in Lemon Grove for 10 years to generate approximately $5,957,000 annually for general city services including street maintenance, emergency services, parks, and homeless services. The measure includes provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits of the tax revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.432794", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.992140", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1894, "fingerprint": "2024|202400711|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400711|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9b698483fe89a1da", "measure_id": "202400711", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure TT", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To address health and safety, install a drinking well with treatment system to eliminate arsenic/ contaminants, upgrade fire alarm system, update electrical and utility, and ensure the evacuation preparedness; shall the Warner Unified School District measure authorizing $3,800,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $38 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding (collecting $243,662 annually on average), with citizen oversight, no funds for administrators, and all money improving Warner Unified School District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 716, "no_votes": 414, "total_votes": 1130, "percent_yes": 63.36283185840708, "percent_no": 36.63716814159292, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Warner Unified School District to issue $3", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Warner Unified School District to issue $3.8 million in bonds to fund health and safety improvements including a drinking water treatment system, fire alarm upgrades, electrical updates, and evacuation preparedness measures. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $38 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.559273", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.048790", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure TT", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1873, "fingerprint": "2024|202400690|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400690|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6545b6bfcc4474c8", "measure_id": "202400690", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With no increase in the expired 2023-24 tax rates, shall Alpine Union School District\u2019s measure to replace leaky roofs, inefficient heating, air-conditioning and electrical at Boulder Oaks Elementary School, Shadow Hills Elementary School, Joan MacQueen Middle School, Mountain View Learning Academy and Creekside Early Learning Center be adopted, authorizing $6.3 million of bonds with legal rates, levies of $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (generating $1,200,000 annually while outstanding), audits, independent oversight, State matching funds eligibility, public disclosure of spending, and no funds taken by the State and used in other school districts?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4127, "no_votes": 6356, "total_votes": 10483, "percent_yes": 39.368501383191834, "percent_no": 60.631498616808166, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Alpine Union School District to issue $6", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Alpine Union School District to issue $6.3 million in bonds to fund facility repairs including roof, heating, air-conditioning, and electrical system improvements at five schools. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.545690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.045249", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1874, "fingerprint": "2024|202400691|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400691|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f30df99219d4c5e9", "measure_id": "202400691", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prepare students for college, careers and trades, and support hands-on math, science, engineering and technology instruction by upgrading classrooms, labs, facilities, and equipment; improving school safety/ security systems, fixing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems; and adding classrooms/ facilities to prevent overcrowding; shall Bonsall Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $59,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (approximately $3,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with oversight, audits, all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5119, "no_votes": 5536, "total_votes": 10655, "percent_yes": 48.0431722196152, "percent_no": 51.9568277803848, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Bonsall Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Bonsall Unified School District to issue $59 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, labs, and facilities, improve safety systems, fix deteriorating infrastructure, and add capacity to reduce overcrowding. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of approximately 4 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.546263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.045418", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1875, "fingerprint": "2024|202400692|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400692|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "2fb9dbf922699daa", "measure_id": "202400692", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Cajon Valley Union School District\u2019s measure to repair or replace leaky roofs, pipes and plumbing; update inefficient heating and cooling systems; and renovate classrooms be adopted, authorizing $280 million of bonds with average levies below $27 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $15 million annually) while outstanding, legal rates, citizen oversight, state matching funds eligibility, audits, full public disclosure of spending and no estimated increase in current tax rates?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31992, "no_votes": 29182, "total_votes": 61174, "percent_yes": 52.296727367836006, "percent_no": 47.703272632163994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Cajon Valley Union School District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Cajon Valley Union School District to issue $280 million in bonds to fund facility repairs and improvements including roof and plumbing repairs, HVAC system updates, and classroom renovations. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies averaging below $27 per $100,000 of assessed property value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.546805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.045583", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1867, "fingerprint": "2024|202400358|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400358|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "77495e72bfad73f8", "measure_id": "202400358", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue providing funding to maintain and improve general city services in Oceanside, including: road repairs, infrastructure maintenance, safe parks, beach and habitat restoration, fire, paramedic, and 911 emergency response, police patrols, crime prevention, and addressing homelessness, shall the City of Oceanside extend the existing \u00bd cent sales tax at the current rate (no increase) for 10 years, providing approximately $19,000,000 annually for general government use, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55360, "no_votes": 24104, "total_votes": 79464, "percent_yes": 69.66676734118595, "percent_no": 30.333232658814055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure extends Oceanside's existing half-cent sales tax for 10 years at ...", "summary_text": "The measure extends Oceanside's existing half-cent sales tax for 10 years at the current rate to fund general city services including infrastructure, public safety, parks, and homeless services. It would generate approximately $19 million annually with citizen oversight and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.433438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.992444", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1877, "fingerprint": "2024|202400694|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400694|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "21c0678b7c756bfc", "measure_id": "202400694", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; construct/ modernize/ renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated heating and cooling systems; and replace leaky roofs; shall Dehesa School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $3,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $222,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $25 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 510, "no_votes": 774, "total_votes": 1284, "percent_yes": 39.719626168224295, "percent_no": 60.280373831775705, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Dehesa School District to issue $3", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Dehesa School District to issue $3.3 million in bonds to fund construction, modernization, and renovation of school facilities including classrooms, restrooms, heating and cooling systems, and roofs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $25 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.547966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.045917", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1878, "fingerprint": "2024|202400695|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400695|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "37305d2060189c46", "measure_id": "202400695", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; replace leaky roofs; upgrade infrastructure including plumbing, sewer, and HVAC; improve safety and security; and construct/renovate/modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Encinitas Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $158,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $9,200,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $19 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24167, "no_votes": 18347, "total_votes": 42514, "percent_yes": 56.84480406454344, "percent_no": 43.15519593545656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Encinitas Union School District to issue $158,300...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Encinitas Union School District to issue $158,300,000 in bonds to fund infrastructure improvements, facility construction and renovation, and safety upgrades at district schools. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $19 per $100,000 of assessed property value and include provisions for annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.549164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.046079", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11017, "fingerprint": "2024|202400712|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400712|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a119b32bbb4777df", "measure_id": "202400712", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve earthquake safety and accessibility at San Francisco public schools; provide reliable internet in classrooms; replace worn-out plumbing, electrical and ventilation systems; improve student nutrition services; and have updated security features; shall San Francisco Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $790,000,000 in bonds at legal rates levying approximately $12.95 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising approximately $56,400,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight and all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 282968, "no_votes": 94329, "total_votes": 377297, "percent_yes": 74.99874104485326, "percent_no": 25.00125895514674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Francisco Unified School District to issue $7...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Francisco Unified School District to issue $790 million in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including earthquake safety upgrades, accessibility enhancements, technology infrastructure, and repairs to plumbing, electrical, and ventilation systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $12.95 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating about $56.4 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.152853", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.559567", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.048945", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1895, "fingerprint": "2024|202400068|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400068|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "fe53b6826b281db0", "measure_id": "202400068", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct, develop, acquire, and/or rehabilitate housing, including workforce housing and senior housing, that will be affordable to households ranging from extremely low-income to moderate-income households; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $300,000,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits, with a duration of up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.0057/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of $25,000,000?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 158497, "no_votes": 66690, "total_votes": 225187, "percent_yes": 70.3846136766332, "percent_no": 29.615386323366806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes San Francisco to issue $300 million in general obliga...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes San Francisco to issue $300 million in general obligation bonds to construct, develop, acquire, and rehabilitate affordable housing for extremely low-income to moderate-income households, including workforce and senior housing. The bonds would have a 30-year duration and be funded through property taxes at an estimated rate of $0.0057 per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.335153", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.946253", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11011, "fingerprint": "2024|202400075|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400075|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1a105965942ee8c2", "measure_id": "202400075", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To finance the acquisition or improvement of real property, including: temporary shelters, particularly for families; facilities that deliver healthcare services, including preventive care and behavioral health services, such as the Chinatown Public Health Center; critical repairs, renovations, and seismic upgrades at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center and Laguna Honda Hospital; and pedestrian and street safety improvements, streetscape enhancements, and other public space improvements; and to pay related costs; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $390,000,000 in general obligation bonds with a duration of up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.0069/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of $31,000,000, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 274187, "no_votes": 102450, "total_votes": 376637, "percent_yes": 72.79874255582962, "percent_no": 27.20125744417038, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Facilities: Health Facilities", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorizes San Francisco to issue $390 million in general...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorizes San Francisco to issue $390 million in general obligation bonds to finance temporary shelters, healthcare facilities improvements including the Chinatown Public Health Center, critical repairs and seismic upgrades at major hospitals, and various public safety and streetscape enhancements. The bonds would have a 30-year duration and be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $0.69 per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.150213", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.337380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.947362", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1896, "fingerprint": "2024|202400069|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400069|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "71df6b97fd291d45", "measure_id": "202400069", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to set minimum police officer staffing levels, require the City to budget enough money to pay the number of police officers employed in the previous year, allow the Police Department to introduce amendments to its budget, and set aside funds to pay for police recruitment, all for at least five years, but all if and only if the voters later adopt a new tax or amend an existing tax to fund these requirements?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61580, "no_votes": 161374, "total_votes": 222954, "percent_yes": 27.620047184621043, "percent_no": 72.37995281537896, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment would have established minimum police staffing levels,...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment would have established minimum police staffing levels, required the city to budget for at least the previous year's number of officers, allowed the Police Department to propose budget amendments, and allocated funds for recruitment for five years, but only if voters separately approved new or amended taxes to fund these requirements.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.335519", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.946415", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11012, "fingerprint": "2024|202400076|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400076|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3dc4768a821e5acf", "measure_id": "202400076", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create the new position of Inspector General in the Controller\u2019s Office to review and investigate complaints of fraud, waste, and abuse, and give the Controller\u2019s Office additional powers to issue subpoenas and execute search warrants when permitted by State law?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 225704, "no_votes": 144662, "total_votes": 370366, "percent_yes": 60.9407991014294, "percent_no": 39.0592008985706, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure creates a new Inspector General position within San Francisco's ...", "summary_text": "This measure creates a new Inspector General position within San Francisco's Controller's Office to investigate complaints of fraud, waste, and abuse, and grants the Controller's Office expanded powers to issue subpoenas and execute search warrants as allowed by state law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.150398", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.337694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.947519", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1897, "fingerprint": "2024|202400070|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400070|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ef7ff8a97d2381cc", "measure_id": "202400070", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City exempt from the real estate transfer tax the first time a property is transferred after being converted from a commercial to residential use, have authority to amend the transfer tax without voter approval but not to increase it, and increase the annual limit on office space available for development by including office space that has been converted to a different use or demolished?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 116311, "no_votes": 104038, "total_votes": 220349, "percent_yes": 52.784900317224036, "percent_no": 47.215099682775964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure exempts the first sale of commercial-to-residential converted pr...", "summary_text": "This measure exempts the first sale of commercial-to-residential converted properties from San Francisco's real estate transfer tax, allows the city to modify (but not increase) the transfer tax without voter approval, and increases the annual office development limit by including converted or demolished office space in the calculation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.335877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.946564", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11013, "fingerprint": "2024|202400077|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400077|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "bd29bc8ceca7016d", "measure_id": "202400077", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to limit the total number of commissions the City may have to 65, retaining certain decision-making commissions and dissolving the others unless the Board of Supervisors instead continues any as advisory bodies; give the Mayor sole authority to appoint and remove City department heads; and give the Police Chief sole authority to adopt rules governing police officers\u2019 conduct?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 158723, "no_votes": 207604, "total_votes": 366327, "percent_yes": 43.328228604498165, "percent_no": 56.671771395501835, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have capped San Francisco's total commissions at 65 while ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have capped San Francisco's total commissions at 65 while dissolving non-decision-making ones, given the Mayor exclusive power to hire and fire department heads, and allowed the Police Chief to unilaterally establish rules for officer conduct.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.150607", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.337976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.947682", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1898, "fingerprint": "2024|202400071|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400071|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2ab82ea46bc5aae1", "measure_id": "202400071", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend its ethics laws to further restrict the gifts City employees and officers may accept, expand the definition of conduct by City employees, officers and others that those laws prohibit as bribery, require additional reporting of gifts to City departments, create a uniform set of rules for nonwork activities of City employees and officers instead of rules by each department, create additional penalties for some ethics violations, require ethics training for additional City employees, and change the requirements for making future amendments to some ethics laws?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 198584, "no_votes": 24031, "total_votes": 222615, "percent_yes": 89.20512993284369, "percent_no": 10.79487006715631, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance amends San Francisco's ethics laws by restricting gifts to cit...", "summary_text": "This ordinance amends San Francisco's ethics laws by restricting gifts to city employees and officers, expanding bribery definitions, requiring additional gift reporting, creating uniform rules for nonwork activities, adding penalties for violations, mandating ethics training for more employees, and changing requirements for future ethics law amendments. The measure passed with 90.9% support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.336214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.946712", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11014, "fingerprint": "2024|202400078|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400078|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "4216b296214f29a5", "measure_id": "202400078", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Task Force with authority to make recommendations by February 1, 2026, on ways the City could change, eliminate, or consolidate commissions to improve the administration of City government; require a financial report on the City\u2019s commissions; and give the Task Force authority to introduce ordinances to implement its recommendations, and if required provide for the City Attorney to draft Charter amendments to submit to voters at a future election?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 192540, "no_votes": 171314, "total_votes": 363854, "percent_yes": 52.916829277677316, "percent_no": 47.083170722322684, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure creates a Task Force with authority to recommend changes, elimin...", "summary_text": "This measure creates a Task Force with authority to recommend changes, elimination, or consolidation of city commissions by February 1, 2026, and allows the Task Force to introduce ordinances or Charter amendments to implement its recommendations. The measure also requires a financial report on the City's commissions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.150793", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.338272", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.947847", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1899, "fingerprint": "2024|202400072|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400072|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "511238b769dad0a8", "measure_id": "202400072", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City allow the Police Department to hold community meetings before the Police Commission can change policing policies, reduce recordkeeping and reporting requirements for police officers, set new policies for police officers to report use-of-force incidents and to engage in vehicle pursuits, authorize the Police Department to use drones and install public surveillance cameras without further approval, and authorize the Police Department to use new surveillance technology unless the Board of Supervisors disapproves?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120529, "no_votes": 102288, "total_votes": 222817, "percent_yes": 54.09326936454579, "percent_no": 45.90673063545421, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows the San Francisco Police Department to hold community mee...", "summary_text": "This measure allows the San Francisco Police Department to hold community meetings before policy changes, reduces officer recordkeeping requirements, sets new use-of-force and vehicle pursuit policies, and authorizes the use of drones, surveillance cameras, and new surveillance technology without requiring additional approval unless the Board of Supervisors objects. The measure expands police operational authority while streamlining certain administrative processes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.336507", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.946893", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11015, "fingerprint": "2024|202400079|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400079|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "586f4f4262d4e596", "measure_id": "202400079", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to define \u201cfull-duty sworn officer\u201d; require the Police Chief to make a report and recommendation on future staffing of full-duty sworn officers to the Police Commission every three years instead of two; require the Police Commission to report annually to the Board of Supervisors on Police Department staffing; and create a five-year program with possible renewals allowing police officers to continue working for the Police Department after retiring, with pension payments deferred while they are working?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 163835, "no_votes": 197836, "total_votes": 361671, "percent_yes": 45.299457241526135, "percent_no": 54.700542758473865, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have defined \"full-duty sworn officer\" in San Francisco's ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have defined \"full-duty sworn officer\" in San Francisco's Charter, changed police staffing reporting requirements from every two years to every three years, and created a program allowing retired police officers to continue working while deferring their pension payments for up to five years with possible renewals.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.150980", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.338582", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.948043", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1900, "fingerprint": "2024|202400073|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400073|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "8ba20015a9d24027", "measure_id": "202400073", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City require single adults age 65 and under with no dependent children who receive City public assistance benefits and whom the City reasonably suspects are dependent on illegal drugs to participate in screening, evaluation and treatment for drug dependency for those adults to be eligible for most of those benefits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 130214, "no_votes": 93790, "total_votes": 224004, "percent_yes": 58.13021196050071, "percent_no": 41.86978803949929, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure requires single adults age 65 and under without dependent childr...", "summary_text": "This measure requires single adults age 65 and under without dependent children who receive city public assistance benefits to participate in drug screening, evaluation, and treatment if the city suspects they are dependent on illegal drugs in order to remain eligible for most benefits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.336802", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.947050", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11016, "fingerprint": "2024|202400080|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400080|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "fc037e294fe3be08", "measure_id": "202400080", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to require the City to appropriate at least $8.25 million a year to pay for rental subsidies for affordable housing developments serving extremely low-income households of seniors, families, and persons with disabilities?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 217807, "no_votes": 153017, "total_votes": 370824, "percent_yes": 58.73595020818502, "percent_no": 41.26404979181498, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires San Francisco to appropriate at least $8", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires San Francisco to appropriate at least $8.25 million annually for rental subsidies in affordable housing developments that serve extremely low-income seniors, families, and persons with disabilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.151166", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.338855", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.948210", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1901, "fingerprint": "2024|202400074|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400074|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9f807bc1244f8bd5", "measure_id": "202400074", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall it be City policy to encourage the San Francisco Unified School District to offer Algebra 1 to students by their eighth-grade year and to support the School District\u2019s development of its math curriculum?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 182066, "no_votes": 40638, "total_votes": 222704, "percent_yes": 81.75246066527768, "percent_no": 18.24753933472232, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": "Education: Curriculum/Policy Issues", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes City policy to encourage the San Francisco Unified S...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes City policy to encourage the San Francisco Unified School District to offer Algebra 1 to students by eighth grade and support the district's math curriculum development.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.337082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.947199", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1902, "fingerprint": "2024|202400081|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400081|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0619a31abc19f12a", "measure_id": "202400081", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to change how pension benefits are calculated for members of the Fire Department hired on or after January 7, 2012, by lowering the age these members can receive the highest pension from 58 to 55, and make those benefits the same as members hired before January 7, 2012?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 192601, "no_votes": 173341, "total_votes": 365942, "percent_yes": 52.6315645648764, "percent_no": 47.3684354351236, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends San Francisco's Charter to lower the age at which Fire De...", "summary_text": "This measure amends San Francisco's Charter to lower the age at which Fire Department members hired on or after January 7, 2012, can receive their highest pension benefits from 58 to 55 years old. It equalizes pension benefits between newer firefighters and those hired before January 7, 2012.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.339147", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.948358", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1903, "fingerprint": "2024|202400082|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400082|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "52469b3369acc3c7", "measure_id": "202400082", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to allow registered nurses who are members of the San Francisco Employees\u2019 Retirement System and meet certain requirements to purchase credits toward their total pension years of service for time previously worked as per diem nurses, and to allow 911 dispatchers, supervisors, and coordinators to increase their pension benefits by joining the SFERS Miscellaneous Safety Plan for time worked starting in January 2025?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 261318, "no_votes": 102141, "total_votes": 363459, "percent_yes": 71.89751801441153, "percent_no": 28.10248198558847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This Charter amendment allows registered nurses in the San Francisco Employee...", "summary_text": "This Charter amendment allows registered nurses in the San Francisco Employees' Retirement System to purchase pension service credits for previous per diem work, and permits 911 dispatchers, supervisors, and coordinators to join the higher-benefit SFERS Miscellaneous Safety Plan for service beginning January 2025.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.339466", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.948507", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1904, "fingerprint": "2024|202400083|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400083|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "20b46e6e093a19b6", "measure_id": "202400083", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create an initiative led by the Mayor and the Superintendent of the School District with the mission of ensuring that City funding for children, youth, and families is used effectively?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 297972, "no_votes": 64813, "total_votes": 362785, "percent_yes": 82.13459762669349, "percent_no": 17.86540237330651, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends San Francisco's Charter to establish a Mayor and School S...", "summary_text": "This measure amends San Francisco's Charter to establish a Mayor and School Superintendent-led initiative focused on ensuring effective use of city funding for children, youth, and families.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.339761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.948668", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1905, "fingerprint": "2024|202400084|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400084|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f5de67b2803d08ae", "measure_id": "202400084", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City use the Upper Great Highway as public open recreation space, permanently closing it to private motor vehicles seven days a week, with limited exceptions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 206042, "no_votes": 170447, "total_votes": 376489, "percent_yes": 54.727229746420214, "percent_no": 45.272770253579786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Open Space", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure permanently closes San Francisco's Upper Great Highway to privat...", "summary_text": "This measure permanently closes San Francisco's Upper Great Highway to private motor vehicles seven days a week and converts it to public recreational open space, with some limited exceptions allowed.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.340037", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.948819", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1906, "fingerprint": "2024|202400085|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400085|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "4c5e7506fbe5bfa4", "measure_id": "202400085", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City place an additional tax permanently on transportation network companies and autonomous vehicle businesses that provide passenger service for compensation with rates between 1% and 4.5% of gross receipts in San Francisco above $500,000 for an estimated annual revenue of $25 million, and use the funds the City collects from the tax to support Muni transportation services and fare discount programs?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 210375, "no_votes": 159200, "total_votes": 369575, "percent_yes": 56.923493201650544, "percent_no": 43.076506798349456, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Mass Transit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a permanent tax of 1% to 4", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a permanent tax of 1% to 4.5% on gross receipts above $500,000 for transportation network companies and autonomous vehicle businesses providing paid passenger service in San Francisco. The estimated $25 million in annual revenue would fund Muni transportation services and fare discount programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.340373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.948965", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1907, "fingerprint": "2024|202400086|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400086|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f507717c73d0e28f", "measure_id": "202400086", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City permanently change the taxes it collects from businesses, including: changing annual gross receipts tax rates to between 0.1% and 3.716%, homelessness gross receipts tax rates to between 0.0162% and 1.64%, business registration fees to between $55 and $60,000, overpaid executive gross receipts tax rates to between 0.02% and 0.129%, and administrative office tax rates to between 2.97% and 3.694% of payroll expense; increasing the gross receipts tax exemption for small businesses; and changing how the City calculates these taxes; for estimated annual revenue of $50 million once fully implemented?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 237930, "no_votes": 104380, "total_votes": 342310, "percent_yes": 69.50717186176273, "percent_no": 30.49282813823727, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This San Francisco measure permanently restructures multiple business taxes b...", "summary_text": "This San Francisco measure permanently restructures multiple business taxes by adjusting gross receipts tax rates, business registration fees, executive compensation taxes, and administrative office payroll taxes while increasing small business exemptions, with an estimated annual revenue increase of $50 million. The changes affect tax rates across various categories, with gross receipts taxes ranging from 0.1% to 3.716% and registration fees from $55 to $60,000 depending on business size and type.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.340677", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.949114", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1908, "fingerprint": "2024|202400087|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400087|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "c20929d3a2baad71", "measure_id": "202400087", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City create a fund that the City could use in the future to help reimburse eligible City employees, including police officers, firefighters, sheriffs, paramedics, registered nurses, and 911 dispatchers, for student loans and education and training programs?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 187979, "no_votes": 175453, "total_votes": 363432, "percent_yes": 51.72329349094191, "percent_no": 48.27670650905809, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure creates a fund that San Francisco could use in the future to help...", "summary_text": "The measure creates a fund that San Francisco could use in the future to help reimburse eligible city employees, including police officers, firefighters, sheriffs, paramedics, registered nurses, and 911 dispatchers, for student loans and education and training programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.340945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.949265", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1909, "fingerprint": "2024|202400088|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400088|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "74bce5eab33aecc9", "measure_id": "202400088", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall it be City policy and law to support, protect, and expand reproductive rights and services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 312914, "no_votes": 60335, "total_votes": 373249, "percent_yes": 83.83518777009449, "percent_no": 16.164812229905507, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes San Francisco city policy to support, protect, and e...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes San Francisco city policy to support, protect, and expand reproductive rights and services. The measure passed with 80.8% approval, making this stance official city policy and law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.341235", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.949413", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1911, "fingerprint": "2024|202400365|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400365|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "8c56893d1a60371f", "measure_id": "202400365", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the order adopted on September 14, 2023, by the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (SJLAFCo) ordering a reorganization affecting the County of San Joaquin, Mountain House Community Services District, and Tracy Rural Fire Protection District, and providing for the incorporation of the City of Mountain House based on the SJLAFCo's Alternative Boundary, divestiture of Mountain House Community Services District powers (with the exception of Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions enforcement authority), annexation of territory to Mountain House Community Services District to correspond with SJLAFCo's Alternative Boundary, establishing Mountain House Community Services District as a subsidiary district of the City of Mountain House, and detachment of territory from Tracy Rural Fire Protection District, be confirmed, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order as more particularly described and set forth in LAFCo Resolution 23-1526?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3925, "no_votes": 397, "total_votes": 4322, "percent_yes": 90.81443776029616, "percent_no": 9.185562239703842, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Incorporation/Formation/Annexation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would incorporate Mountain House as a new city within San Joaqui...", "summary_text": "This measure would incorporate Mountain House as a new city within San Joaquin County, transfer most powers from the existing Mountain House Community Services District to the new city government while making the district a subsidiary, and detach some territory from the Tracy Rural Fire Protection District. The measure implements a reorganization order previously adopted by the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission in September 2023.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.435559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.993518", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1912, "fingerprint": "2024|202400366|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400366|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "555e743cb4d373bc", "measure_id": "202400366", "measure_letter": "E1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure E1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall members of the city council in future elections be elected by district, from district or at large? Votes for: AT LARGE", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1845, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 1845, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked San Joaquin voters to choose whether future city council m...", "summary_text": "This measure asked San Joaquin voters to choose whether future city council members should be elected by district, from district, or at large. The measure passed with voters selecting the \"at large\" option, meaning council members will continue to be elected city-wide rather than from specific geographic districts.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.435886", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.993671", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure E1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11018, "fingerprint": "2024|202400367|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400367|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "ada8e3baf5982a89", "measure_id": "202400367", "measure_letter": "E2", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure E2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall members of the city council in future elections be elected by district, from district or at large? Votes for: BY DISTRICT", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1374, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 1374, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed San Joaquin's city council elections from the...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed San Joaquin's city council elections from the current at-large system to a district-based system where council members are elected by and from specific geographic districts within the city.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.153606", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.436228", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.993823", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure E2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11019, "fingerprint": "2024|202400368|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400368|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "5574bdf0435a1f63", "measure_id": "202400368", "measure_letter": "E3", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure E3", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall members of the city council in future elections be elected by district, from district or at large? Votes for: FROM DISTRICT", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1052, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 1052, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed San Joaquin's city council election system so...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed San Joaquin's city council election system so that council members would be elected from specific districts rather than at-large. The measure failed with only 1.0% support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.153797", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.436546", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.994060", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure E3", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1919, "fingerprint": "2024|202400715|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400715|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "ec37a821283868a8", "measure_id": "202400715", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Oakdale schools; expand/renovate career technical education classrooms and labs; replace leaky roofs; upgrade aging electrical, plumbing, and sewer; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Oakdale Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $105,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating approximately $6,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at average rates of approximately $58.16 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61, "no_votes": 113, "total_votes": 174, "percent_yes": 35.05747126436782, "percent_no": 64.94252873563218, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Oakdale Joint Unified School District ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Oakdale Joint Unified School District to issue $105.5 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including career technical education upgrades, roof replacements, infrastructure modernization, and classroom renovations. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $58.16 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.560666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.049442", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1918, "fingerprint": "2024|202400714|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400714|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "3f1e90b9e0e7b787", "measure_id": "202400714", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide a high-quality education for all students by keeping schools safe/clean; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation systems; improve school security/fire safety, upgrade science/engineering/technology classrooms/labs; increase disability access, shall Galt Joint Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $27,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation, raising $1,960,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring audits, independent citizen oversight, and all funds controlled locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 297, "no_votes": 431, "total_votes": 728, "percent_yes": 40.7967032967033, "percent_no": 59.2032967032967, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Galt Joint Union Elementary School Dis...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Galt Joint Union Elementary School District to issue $27 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including repairs to roofs, plumbing, and HVAC systems, security and fire safety upgrades, classroom modernization, and disability access improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $1.96 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.560301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.049276", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1920, "fingerprint": "2024|202400716|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400716|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "b2b34f282172ab0a", "measure_id": "202400716", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade aging schools, attract/retain quality teachers, and maintain quality education by repairing/replacing deteriorating roofs, restrooms, plumbing, heating, cooling and electrical systems; improving security/fire safety; and providing up-to-date classrooms, labs, technology; shall Ripon Unified School District\u2019s measure, authorizing $32,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, averaging $30 per $100,000 assessed valuation (approximately $2,661,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, public spending disclosure, and no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5398, "no_votes": 4762, "total_votes": 10160, "percent_yes": 53.12992125984252, "percent_no": 46.87007874015748, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Ripon Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Ripon Unified School District to issue $32 million in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including repairs to roofs, restrooms, plumbing, and electrical systems, as well as classroom and technology upgrades. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes averaging $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.560989", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.049608", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1917, "fingerprint": "2024|202400713|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400713|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "0343763d4ffd4f33", "measure_id": "202400713", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, and career technical facilities, replace outdated portable classrooms with permanent facilities, provide new technology, improve student safety and security, and make the district eligible to receive matching state grants, shall Escalon Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $27,700,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying an average of $29 per $100,000 assessed valuation, raising approximately $2,300,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3099, "no_votes": 3094, "total_votes": 6193, "percent_yes": 50.04036815759729, "percent_no": 49.95963184240271, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Escalon Unified School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Escalon Unified School District to issue $27,700,000 in bonds to fund facility upgrades including classrooms, science labs, career technical facilities, technology improvements, and safety enhancements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes averaging $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $2,300,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.559926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.049112", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1915, "fingerprint": "2024|202400371|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400371|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "30fdc51fd859378f", "measure_id": "202400371", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be revised to assign the City of Stockton Public Information Office to the City Manager and provide the Mayoral Public Information Office access to the information necessary to fulfill their role?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59220, "no_votes": 19763, "total_votes": 78983, "percent_yes": 74.97815985718445, "percent_no": 25.02184014281555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure revises the Stockton City Charter to place the City's Public Info...", "summary_text": "The measure revises the Stockton City Charter to place the City's Public Information Office under the City Manager while ensuring the Mayor's Public Information Office has access to necessary information to perform its functions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.437471", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.995023", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1916, "fingerprint": "2024|202400372|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400372|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "5075df865497f8cf", "measure_id": "202400372", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be revised to impose impartial and binding arbitration for Sworn Police and Fire Department Employee Disputes including procedures for impasse resolution for all terms and conditions of employment?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51937, "no_votes": 27269, "total_votes": 79206, "percent_yes": 65.57205262227609, "percent_no": 34.42794737772391, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure revises the Stockton City Charter to require impartial and bindi...", "summary_text": "This measure revises the Stockton City Charter to require impartial and binding arbitration for resolving disputes involving sworn police and fire department employees, including impasse resolution procedures for all employment terms and conditions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.437790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.995186", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1922, "fingerprint": "2024|202400718|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400718|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c9400a98e1a664b8", "measure_id": "202400718", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ upgrade classrooms, science labs, facilities, and technology for quality education in math, science, technology, arts, and engineering; remove hazardous materials like asbestos/ lead; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems; and improve school safety/ security, shall Tracy Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District #3's measure authorizing $190,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $50 per $100,000 assessed value ($11,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, and all funds for Tracy schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16657, "no_votes": 9490, "total_votes": 26147, "percent_yes": 63.70520518606341, "percent_no": 36.29479481393659, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Tracy Unified School District to issue $190 million i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Tracy Unified School District to issue $190 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, science labs, technology infrastructure, and safety systems, while removing hazardous materials like asbestos and lead. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $50 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.561658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.049935", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1913, "fingerprint": "2024|202400369|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400369|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "f8174a11baf99b12", "measure_id": "202400369", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect Escalon's long-term financial stability by funding Escalon servies such as maintaing 911 response, neighborhood police patrols; recruiting/retaining police officers; repairing streets/potholes; protecting essential drinking water from pollution; maintaining Hogan Park, youth sports leagues; and for general governmental use; shall the City of Escalon adopt a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing aproximately $900,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits/public spending disclosure/all funds benefit Escalon residents, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2517, "no_votes": 868, "total_votes": 3385, "percent_yes": 74.35745937961596, "percent_no": 25.64254062038404, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopts a 1-cent sales tax in Escalon to generate approximately $...", "summary_text": "This measure adopts a 1-cent sales tax in Escalon to generate approximately $900,000 annually for city services including police, street repairs, water protection, and park maintenance. The tax continues until ended by voters and requires audits and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.436847", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.994213", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1914, "fingerprint": "2024|202400370|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400370|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "cfc20dae1bbe147d", "measure_id": "202400370", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding that stays in Manteca to benefit residents, used for street and traffic improvements (including potholes), job creation, local business support, homeless services, youth services, enhance public safety facilities and services, and other quality of life services, shall the City enact a temporary \u00be-cent increase in sales tax (from 8.25% to 9%), for 20 years, generating approximately $13 million annually, with mandatory annual audits and review of expenditures through a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16608, "no_votes": 16199, "total_votes": 32807, "percent_yes": 50.62334257932758, "percent_no": 49.37665742067242, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacted a temporary 0", "summary_text": "The measure enacted a temporary 0.75% sales tax increase in Manteca for 20 years, raising the rate from 8.25% to 9% to generate approximately $13 million annually for street improvements, public safety, homeless services, youth programs, and other city services. The measure includes mandatory annual audits and citizen oversight of expenditures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.437179", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.994374", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1910, "fingerprint": "2024|202400089|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400089|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "01771d62fc655169", "measure_id": "202400089", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance requiring single adults age 65 and under, with no dependent children, who receive County funded public assistance benefits and whom the County reasonably suspects are dependent on illegal drugs, to participate in screening, evaluation, and treatment for drug dependency in order for those adults to be eligible for those benefits be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 184742, "no_votes": 62930, "total_votes": 247672, "percent_yes": 74.59139507090022, "percent_no": 25.40860492909978, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance requires single adults aged 65 and under with no dependent chi...", "summary_text": "This ordinance requires single adults aged 65 and under with no dependent children who receive county-funded public assistance to undergo drug screening, evaluation, and treatment if the county suspects they are dependent on illegal drugs as a condition for receiving benefits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.341531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.949561", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1921, "fingerprint": "2024|202400717|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400717|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "d768b0703ec192d4", "measure_id": "202400717", "measure_letter": "\u200bK", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure \u200bK", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local community college classrooms/labs/access for nursing/vocational career training, student safety; remove asbestos, lead paint, mold; ensure safe drinking water, repair deteriorating sewers, roofs; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, sites, facilities, equipment; shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1\u2019s measure authorizing $598,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $16 per $100,000 assessed valuation, generating $34,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring local control, oversight, audits, spending disclosure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 141246, "no_votes": 93950, "total_votes": 235196, "percent_yes": 60.05459276518308, "percent_no": 39.94540723481692, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Joaquin Delta Community College District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Joaquin Delta Community College District to issue $598 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and lab construction, health and safety upgrades like asbestos removal, and infrastructure repairs. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of $16 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $34.8 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.561312", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.049772", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure \u200bK", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1928, "fingerprint": "2024|202400378|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400378|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "ef8e42b958c8f3b5", "measure_id": "202400378", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, to amend Plan Morro Bay (General Plan / Local Coastal Program) in order to prohibit, unless approved by voters, any changes to land use designations of Visitor- Serving Commercial and/or Commercial/Recreational Fishing, for approximately 103 acres of real property (including by the harbor east of Morro Rock, 63 acres of former power plant, portions along sides of Embarcadero Road from Beach Street to Atascadero Road, and along Coleman Drive), be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3940, "no_votes": 2635, "total_votes": 6575, "percent_yes": 59.92395437262358, "percent_no": 40.07604562737642, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Morro Bay's General Plan to require voter approval for an...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Morro Bay's General Plan to require voter approval for any changes to land use designations of Visitor-Serving Commercial and/or Commercial/Recreational Fishing on approximately 103 acres of property, including areas near the harbor, the former power plant site, and portions along Embarcadero Road and Coleman Drive. The measure passed, meaning these land use designations are now protected from changes unless voters approve them in future elections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.439794", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.996102", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1931, "fingerprint": "2024|202400719|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400719|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "cd3fe2be721c535d", "measure_id": "202400719", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Atascadero Unified School District's measure to renovate vocational and career technical education labs; expand classrooms for Robotics, Coding, Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics; and repair leaky roofs, plumbing and classrooms be adopted, authorizing $110 million of bonds with legal rates, average levies below $46 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $6.4 million annually while outstanding), audits, taxpayer oversight and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10990, "no_votes": 8426, "total_votes": 19416, "percent_yes": 56.602801812937784, "percent_no": 43.397198187062216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Atascadero Unified School District to issue $110 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Atascadero Unified School District to issue $110 million in bonds to renovate vocational and career technical education labs, expand STEAM classrooms, and repair infrastructure including roofs and plumbing. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging less than $46 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.562023", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.050085", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1933, "fingerprint": "2024|202400721|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400721|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "3a97e32fea407cca", "measure_id": "202400721", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Templeton Unified School District's measure to expand Vocational/Technical Education facilities; repair leaky roofs/plumbing; and update Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics classrooms be adopted, authorizing $52.3 million of bonds with average levies below $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $3.1 million annually) while outstanding, legal rates, audits, citizen oversight, State matching funds eligibility, and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3439, "no_votes": 2733, "total_votes": 6172, "percent_yes": 55.71937783538561, "percent_no": 44.28062216461439, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Templeton Unified School District to issue $52", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Templeton Unified School District to issue $52.3 million in bonds to expand vocational/technical education facilities, repair infrastructure like roofs and plumbing, and update STEAM classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $3.1 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.562662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.050396", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1923, "fingerprint": "2024|202400373|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400373|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "63a3360916c79307", "measure_id": "202400373", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding for Arroyo Grande city services, such as: fixing potholes, maintaining city streets, sidewalks, parks, aging infrastructure, and community facilities; providing local fire protection, police, and 9:-1-1 emergency services; cleaning up litter/graffiti, and addres.sing homelessness; -shall City of Arroyo Grande's ordinance establishing a one-cent sales tax for 1 0 years be adopted, providing $6,000,000 annually for general government use that can't be taken by the State; witti citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6861, "no_votes": 3702, "total_votes": 10563, "percent_yes": 64.95313831297926, "percent_no": 35.04686168702074, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in Arroyo Grande for 10 years t...", "summary_text": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in Arroyo Grande for 10 years to generate approximately $6 million annually for general city services including infrastructure maintenance, public safety, and community facilities. The measure includes provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits of the revenue generated.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.438166", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.995336", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1930, "fingerprint": "2024|202400380|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400380|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "6a99a0e461ce8996", "measure_id": "202400380", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain the City of Pismo Beach\u2019s long term financial stability and services such as fixing potholes; keeping streets, sidewalks, infrastructure, parks, and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained; providing police/fire protection, 9-1-1 emergency services; addressing homelessness; and for general government use, shall the City extend its Measure I sales tax and set the rate at 1\u00a2 per dollar, providing approximately $4,000,000 annually for 12 years; requiring independent audits, with all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3162, "no_votes": 1895, "total_votes": 5057, "percent_yes": 62.52719003361676, "percent_no": 37.47280996638324, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Pismo Beach's existing sales tax at 1 cent per dollar fo...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Pismo Beach's existing sales tax at 1 cent per dollar for 12 years to fund general city services including infrastructure maintenance, public safety, parks, and homelessness programs. The tax is expected to generate approximately $4 million annually with independent audits required and all funds staying local.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.440450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.996419", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1926, "fingerprint": "2024|202400376|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400376|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "9990097fef882165", "measure_id": "202400376", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Resolution No. 23-37, \"A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grover Beach, California, amending the Master Fee Schedule for water and wastewater rates\", adopted December 11, 2023, be repealed?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3685, "no_votes": 2018, "total_votes": 5703, "percent_yes": 64.61511485183237, "percent_no": 35.384885148167626, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Wastewater/Sewage", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would repeal a December 2023 resolution that amended the ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would repeal a December 2023 resolution that amended the master fee schedule for water and wastewater rates in Grover Beach, California. The measure passed, meaning the amended rate schedule was repealed.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.439166", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.995803", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1932, "fingerprint": "2024|202400720|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400720|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "847ee5f327bb357f", "measure_id": "202400720", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and improve aging neighborhood schools; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; remove asbestos/ lead pipes; repair, construct/ acquire classrooms, labs, sites, facilities and equipment; support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering. arts and skilled trades; shall Lucia Mar Unified School District's measure authorizing $143,220,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 2\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($9,030,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money local Iy-control lecl?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23224, "no_votes": 18803, "total_votes": 42027, "percent_yes": 55.259713993385205, "percent_no": 44.740286006614795, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Lucia Mar Unified School District to issue $143,2...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Lucia Mar Unified School District to issue $143,220,000 in bonds to repair and improve school facilities, including fixing roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, removing hazardous materials, and constructing new classrooms and labs. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 2 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.562387", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.050235", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1929, "fingerprint": "2024|202400379|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400379|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "9d8e6d88d57f3998", "measure_id": "202400379", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to extend the existing voter-approved \u00bd\u00a2 sales tax for general government use including to improve Paso Robles\u2019 long-term finances, maintain important services such as fixing damaged streets/roads/infrastructure, repairing potholes, synchronizing traffic signals, maintaining traffic/pedestrian safety, and improving emergency evacuation routes, providing approximately $5,500,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, citizen oversight, public disclosure of all spending, all funds for Paso Robles, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7502, "no_votes": 6283, "total_votes": 13785, "percent_yes": 54.421472615161406, "percent_no": 45.578527384838594, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends an existing half-cent sales tax in Paso Robles for gener...", "summary_text": "This measure extends an existing half-cent sales tax in Paso Robles for general government services including street repairs, infrastructure maintenance, traffic safety improvements, and emergency evacuation routes. The tax would generate approximately $5.5 million annually and includes requirements for audits, citizen oversight, and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.440141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.996252", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1924, "fingerprint": "2024|202400374|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400374|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "a787e18c76366e41", "measure_id": "202400374", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding that cannot be seized by Sacramento, and that will be used locally for such things as repair of neighborhood roads, aging infrastructure along with other vital general government needs, shall the City extend its current \u00bd cent per dollar sales tax (Measure F-14), providing approximately $3,000,000 annually, until ended by voters; with citizen committee oversight, published annual reporting and independent financial audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10890, "no_votes": 4518, "total_votes": 15408, "percent_yes": 70.67757009345794, "percent_no": 29.322429906542055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends San Luis Obispo's existing half-cent sales tax to provid...", "summary_text": "This measure extends San Luis Obispo's existing half-cent sales tax to provide approximately $3 million annually for local infrastructure repairs, road maintenance, and general government services. The extended tax will continue indefinitely until voters choose to end it, with oversight through citizen committees, annual reporting, and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.438542", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.995489", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1925, "fingerprint": "2024|202400375|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400375|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "7028bdca331a3c1f", "measure_id": "202400375", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6976, "no_votes": 7205, "total_votes": 14181, "percent_yes": 49.19258162329878, "percent_no": 50.80741837670122, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.438872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.995652", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1927, "fingerprint": "2024|202400377|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400377|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "e7502d912375e796", "measure_id": "202400377", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure R1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Daniel Rushing be recalled (removed) from the office of council member of District 2 of the city of Grover Beach?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 792, "no_votes": 638, "total_votes": 1430, "percent_yes": 55.38461538461539, "percent_no": 44.61538461538461, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure recalled Daniel Rushing from his position as District 2 council ...", "summary_text": "This measure recalled Daniel Rushing from his position as District 2 council member in Grover Beach, California. The recall was approved by voters, resulting in his removal from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:28", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.439462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.995953", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure R1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1938, "fingerprint": "2024|202400384|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400384|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "99a73b937aa9c9a9", "measure_id": "202400384", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain general Town services such as 911 emergency response, community programs and events, parks, public safety, recreational youth and adult programs, respond to property crimes/thefts/burglaries, and retain/attract local businesses; shall the measure establishing a 1/2\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $2.3 million annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, public spendinq disclosures, funds locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 454, "no_votes": 99, "total_votes": 553, "percent_yes": 82.09764918625679, "percent_no": 17.90235081374321, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a half-cent sales tax in San Mateo to fund general t...", "summary_text": "This measure established a half-cent sales tax in San Mateo to fund general town services including emergency response, public safety, parks, community programs, and local business support, generating approximately $2.3 million annually. The tax includes requirements for audits and public spending disclosures, with funds remaining under local control until ended by future voter action.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.441724", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.997033", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1934, "fingerprint": "2024|202400090|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400090|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0e8a03cf2d866ec2", "measure_id": "202400090", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure set forth in Resolution No. 080010 of the County of San Mateo continuing the levy of a special tax for four years at a maximum rate of $65 per parcel, raising up to approximately $90,000 per year, for extended police and structural fire protection services in County Services Area No. 1 be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1360, "no_votes": 189, "total_votes": 1549, "percent_yes": 87.79857972885733, "percent_no": 12.201420271142666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues a special tax of up to $65 per parcel for four years i...", "summary_text": "This measure continues a special tax of up to $65 per parcel for four years in San Mateo County Services Area No. 1, raising approximately $90,000 annually for extended police and fire protection services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.341819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.949710", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1944, "fingerprint": "2024|202400391|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400391|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "815bd5bc9358208b", "measure_id": "202400391", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to maintain local city services, such as: maintaining 911 emergency response/neighborhood police patrols; fixing potholes, repairing streets/sidewalks; maintaining on-duty firefighters/paramedics; and storm drains to prevent flooding; by modernizing the City of Redwood City business license tax base, and per employee rates between $10 and $250, with the highest fee on larger businesses, for general government use, as described in the ordinance, providing approximately $7,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26988, "no_votes": 5228, "total_votes": 32216, "percent_yes": 83.77203873851502, "percent_no": 16.227961261484978, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure modernizes Redwood City's business license tax structure with pe...", "summary_text": "This measure modernizes Redwood City's business license tax structure with per-employee rates ranging from $10 to $250, with higher fees for larger businesses, generating approximately $7 million annually for general city services. The tax would continue indefinitely until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.444047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.998102", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1949, "fingerprint": "2024|202400722|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400722|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "292748b18f6e79e7", "measure_id": "202400722", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain/enhance quality elementary and middle schools education, with local funding the State cannot take away; protect core academics in reading, writing, math, science/ technology; attract/ retain high quality teachers; and support students to read at grade level, shall Jefferson Elementary School District's measure be adopted replacing the expiring measure with an annual $88/parcel tax, raising $1,640,000 annually, for 9 years, with independent oversight, an exemption for senior homeowners, and no money for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8543, "no_votes": 3691, "total_votes": 12234, "percent_yes": 69.82998201732875, "percent_no": 30.170017982671254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure replaces an expiring parcel tax with a new $88 annual tax per pa...", "summary_text": "This measure replaces an expiring parcel tax with a new $88 annual tax per parcel in the Jefferson Elementary School District for 9 years, raising approximately $1,640,000 annually for elementary and middle school education. The measure includes exemptions for senior homeowners and independent oversight, with funds designated for core academics, teacher retention, and student reading support rather than administrative costs.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.562991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.050547", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1941, "fingerprint": "2024|202400388|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400388|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "43fecce250284c6c", "measure_id": "202400388", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain critical City services, such as: street/ pothole repair; park/ recreation programs; enhance emergency preparedness for storms, flooding, wildfires; police 911 emergency response/ preparedness; storm drain maintenance; and for general government use; shall the City of Menlo Park measure be adopted raising the transient occupancy (hotel) tax from 12 percent to 15.5 percent, paid only by hotel/ lodging guests until ended by voters, providing an estimated $3,600,000 annually, that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13009, "no_votes": 2562, "total_votes": 15571, "percent_yes": 83.54633613769187, "percent_no": 16.453663862308133, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases San Mateo's transient occupancy tax on hotel and lodgi...", "summary_text": "This measure increases San Mateo's transient occupancy tax on hotel and lodging guests from 12 percent to 15.5 percent to fund city services including street repair, parks, emergency preparedness, and police response. The tax increase is estimated to generate $3.6 million annually and remains in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.443050", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.997648", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1937, "fingerprint": "2024|202400383|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400383|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d78119fdac01f0af", "measure_id": "202400383", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure DD", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance simplifying the existing City of Belmont business license structure, funding general city services, such as: fixing potholes, streets and sidewalks, maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response, maintaining parks, open space, and sports fields, maintaining neighborhood police patrols, crime prevention, keeping public areas healthy, safe, clean; lowering most businesses' rates with typical rates between 0.04% and 0.1% of gross receipts, described in the ordinance, until ended by voters, maintaining $1,300,000 annually, requiring independent audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10945, "no_votes": 1980, "total_votes": 12925, "percent_yes": 84.68085106382979, "percent_no": 15.319148936170208, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure simplifies Belmont's business license structure and establishes a...", "summary_text": "The measure simplifies Belmont's business license structure and establishes a business tax with rates typically between 0.04% and 0.1% of gross receipts to fund general city services. The tax is expected to generate $1,300,000 annually and includes requirements for independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.441427", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.996882", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure DD", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1952, "fingerprint": "2024|202400725|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400725|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6b997e782276dd69", "measure_id": "202400725", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair Woodside Elementary School by fixing and replacing leaking roofs; replacing outdated HVAC systems; repairing/stabilizing creek erosion; modernizing classrooms for current standards; replacing/modernizing kindergarten classrooms; and acquiring, constructing and/or repairing classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Woodside Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $36,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (averaging\u00a082,400,000 annually), with citizen oversight, annual audits, local control, and no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 910, "no_votes": 482, "total_votes": 1392, "percent_yes": 65.37356321839081, "percent_no": 34.626436781609186, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Woodside Elementary School District to issue $36 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Woodside Elementary School District to issue $36 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including fixing roofs, replacing HVAC systems, addressing creek erosion, and updating classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.564193", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.051008", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1961, "fingerprint": "2024|202400734|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400734|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "57aafea805094ed9", "measure_id": "202400734", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure EE", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and enhance quality elementary and middle school education, with local funding the State cannot take away, by attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers/counselors/staff; enhancing math, history, reading and writing programs; maintaining hands-on science, technology/art/music programs; and supporting student success; shall Pacifica School District's measure be adopted levying $98 per parcel, with annual adjustments, raising $1,100,000 annually, for 8 years, exempting seniors, with independent oversight and no money for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13902, "no_votes": 5268, "total_votes": 19170, "percent_yes": 72.51956181533646, "percent_no": 27.48043818466354, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure levies a $98 annual parcel tax on properties in the Pacifica Scho...", "summary_text": "The measure levies a $98 annual parcel tax on properties in the Pacifica School District for 8 years, with annual adjustments and senior exemptions, to raise approximately $1,100,000 annually for elementary and middle school programs including teacher retention, academic subjects, and arts/science programs. The measure passed with 50.7% of the vote and includes provisions for independent oversight and prohibits using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.569714", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.052411", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure EE", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1942, "fingerprint": "2024|202400389|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400389|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ac9890ff2545f86c", "measure_id": "202400389", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure FF", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Council term limit ordinance be updated stating that no person shall be eligible to serve for more than three successive four-year terms be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7729, "no_votes": 2176, "total_votes": 9905, "percent_yes": 78.03129732458355, "percent_no": 21.968702675416452, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure updates San Mateo's term limit ordinance to limit City Council m...", "summary_text": "This measure updates San Mateo's term limit ordinance to limit City Council members to no more than three successive four-year terms (12 years total). It modifies the existing term limit structure for council positions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.443406", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.997801", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure FF", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1950, "fingerprint": "2024|202400723|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400723|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5fcaf4e030c3736f", "measure_id": "202400723", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize outdated elementary schools with updated classrooms and science labs; construct local affordable workforce rental housing for teachers and staff; replace aging portables, heating/cooling systems; and ensure access for students with disabilities; shall Pacifica School District's measure be adopted authorizing $70,000,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated $30 per $100,000 of assessed value generating an average of $4,400,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent oversight, all funds staying in Pacifica?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7067, "no_votes": 4481, "total_votes": 11548, "percent_yes": 61.196744024939385, "percent_no": 38.803255975060615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Pacifica School District to issue $70 million in ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Pacifica School District to issue $70 million in bonds to modernize elementary schools, construct affordable housing for teachers and staff, replace aging infrastructure, and improve disability access. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.563302", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.050697", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1955, "fingerprint": "2024|202400728|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400728|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "32439ad9de18eaf1", "measure_id": "202400728", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure GG", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain excellent education for Burlingame students by attracting and retaining qualified teachers; protecting core academic programs in math, reading, and writing; reducing class sizes; and providing hands-on science, technology and engineering classes, shall Burlingame Elementary School District's measure be adopted, levying $0.14 per building square foot, capped at $2,500 per parcel and $25 per unimproved parcel, providing $3,600,000 annually for 8 years, with citizens\u2022 oversight, senior exemptions, no funds for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11203, "no_votes": 3936, "total_votes": 15139, "percent_yes": 74.00092476385495, "percent_no": 25.999075236145046, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies a property tax of $0", "summary_text": "This measure levies a property tax of $0.14 per building square foot (capped at $2,500 per parcel and $25 per unimproved parcel) to provide $3,600,000 annually for 8 years to the Burlingame Elementary School District. The funds are designated for teacher retention, core academic programs, class size reduction, and science/technology classes, with provisions for citizen oversight and senior exemptions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.566394", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.051476", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure GG", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1951, "fingerprint": "2024|202400724|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400724|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "211110412839abc4", "measure_id": "202400724", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve elementary and middle schools by repairing aging classrooms, leaky roofs, heating, cooling, plumbing and electrical systems; upgrading science, technology, engineering, arts and math classrooms; and improving fire and safety systems and accessibility for students; shall San Carlos School District's measure authorizing $176,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value (57,400,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizens oversight/audits, no funds for administrator salaries, all funds spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6283, "no_votes": 3655, "total_votes": 9938, "percent_yes": 63.221976252767156, "percent_no": 36.778023747232844, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Carlos School District to issue $176 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Carlos School District to issue $176 million in bonds to fund repairs and upgrades to elementary and middle school facilities, including classroom improvements, infrastructure repairs, and safety system upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.563678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.050855", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1953, "fingerprint": "2024|202400726|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400726|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "3634425d4d8864ba", "measure_id": "202400726", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure HH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade classroom technology; make energy-efficiency improvements; construct and renovate school facilities; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Bayshore Elementary School District's measure be adopted authorizing $12,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $720,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1215, "no_votes": 490, "total_votes": 1705, "percent_yes": 71.26099706744868, "percent_no": 28.739002932551315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Bayshore Elementary School District to issue $12", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Bayshore Elementary School District to issue $12.5 million in bonds to fund classroom technology upgrades, energy efficiency improvements, school facility construction and renovation, and health, safety and accessibility improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating an average of $720,000 annually until paid off.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.565019", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.051174", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure HH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1935, "fingerprint": "2024|202400091|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400091|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b5964a1d96b9b322", "measure_id": "202400091", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure II", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Pescadero Municipal Advisory Council\u2019s membership be reduced from thirteen councilmembers to five councilmembers, all five of whom to be elected at-large to serve four-year terms, except that, for those councilmembers elected at the November 5, 2024 election, the three candidates receiving the highest number of votes to serve initial four-year terms commencing January 1, 2025, and the two candidates receiving the next highest number of votes to serve initial two-year terms commencing January 1, 2025?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 450, "no_votes": 170, "total_votes": 620, "percent_yes": 72.58064516129032, "percent_no": 27.41935483870968, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reduces the Pescadero Municipal Advisory Council from thirteen m...", "summary_text": "This measure reduces the Pescadero Municipal Advisory Council from thirteen members to five members, all elected at-large to serve four-year terms. It establishes staggered initial terms, with the top three vote-getters in the 2024 election serving four years and the next two serving two years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.342332", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.949862", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure II", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1960, "fingerprint": "2024|202400733|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400733|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d463126e754fc3b7", "measure_id": "202400733", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve all local elementary/middle schools by upgrading math, reading and writing classrooms; updating science, technology, and engineering labs; repairing leaking roofs; providing teachers with instructional tools to prepare students for future success; and rebuilding aging school facilities, shall Millbrae Elementary School District's measure be adopted authorizing $95,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 assessed value, $6,000,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, and funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6986, "no_votes": 3964, "total_votes": 10950, "percent_yes": 63.799086757990864, "percent_no": 36.200913242009136, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Millbrae Elementary School District to issue $95 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Millbrae Elementary School District to issue $95 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, science and technology labs, repair facilities, and rebuild aging schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.569214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.052260", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1939, "fingerprint": "2024|202400385|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400385|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9bc13606c44c8097", "measure_id": "202400385", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure JJ", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) To fund tenant rental assistance and other specified housing purposes such as affordable homeownership, affordable housing preservation, protecting residents from displacement or homelessness, and administrative expenses, shall the initiative measure requiring funds raised by the existing 2.5% tax on gross receipts (that cannot be passed on to tenants) when renting certain types of residential units, until repealed by the voters, which raises approximately $1.45 million annually, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4860, "no_votes": 1418, "total_votes": 6278, "percent_yes": 77.41318891366677, "percent_no": 22.586811086333228, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Housing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative dedicates revenue from an existing 2", "summary_text": "This initiative dedicates revenue from an existing 2.5% gross receipts tax on certain residential rental units to fund tenant rental assistance, affordable homeownership programs, affordable housing preservation, and displacement prevention efforts. The measure raises approximately $1.45 million annually and prohibits landlords from passing the tax cost on to tenants.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.442053", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.997193", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure JJ", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1956, "fingerprint": "2024|202400729|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400729|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d7040daec332e7e4", "measure_id": "202400729", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds the' State cannot take and spend elsewhere, shall Cabrillo Unified School District's measure to improve classrooms and ensure disability access at Hatch Elementary, El Granada Elementary, Farallone View Elementary, Kings Mountain Elementary, Cunha Intermediate and Half Moon Bay High and increase competitiveness\u00b7 in attracting/ retaining employees by constructing . teacher /staff housing be adopted, authorizing $153.4 million of bonds with average levies below $55 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising' $8,700,000 annually while outstanding), legal rates, citizen oversight, State matching funds eligibility, audits, and public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8462, "no_votes": 5179, "total_votes": 13641, "percent_yes": 62.033575251081295, "percent_no": 37.966424748918705, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Cabrillo Unified School District to issue $153", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Cabrillo Unified School District to issue $153.4 million in bonds to improve classrooms, ensure disability access at six schools, and construct teacher/staff housing. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below $55 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.566970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.051639", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1946, "fingerprint": "2024|202400393|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400393|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c3a0ba7016ec7dd8", "measure_id": "202400393", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of the San Carlos city treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11206, "no_votes": 3774, "total_votes": 14980, "percent_yes": 74.8064085447263, "percent_no": 25.193591455273705, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changes the San Carlos city treasurer position from an elected o...", "summary_text": "This measure changes the San Carlos city treasurer position from an elected office to one that is appointed by the city government.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.444670", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.998407", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1943, "fingerprint": "2024|202400390|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400390|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2e88c3f3677f04d7", "measure_id": "202400390", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an Ordinance updating a transient occupancy tax (paid only by hotel and other short term lodging guests) to a 15% rate to continue funding vital Pacifica services, such as police, fire, 911 emergency response; street/pothole repair; youth/senior programs; adapting to sea-level rise; keeping trash off beaches; and generating approximately $720, 000 annually in additional revenue until ended by voters and subject to annual audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15284, "no_votes": 4380, "total_votes": 19664, "percent_yes": 77.72579332790886, "percent_no": 22.27420667209114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases San Mateo's transient occupancy tax on hotel and short...", "summary_text": "This measure increases San Mateo's transient occupancy tax on hotel and short-term lodging guests to 15% to fund city services including police, fire, emergency response, street repair, youth and senior programs, and sea-level rise adaptation. The measure is estimated to generate approximately $720,000 in additional annual revenue and is subject to annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.443723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.997952", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1957, "fingerprint": "2024|202400730|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400730|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4882a75b99abb9e1", "measure_id": "202400730", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and. spent elsewhere, shall Cabrillo Unified School District's replacement parcel tax be adopted, raising $2.14 million per year to attract and retain top-tier educators; increase teacher/ staff wages; expand Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Math, and career and college preparation programs at Hatch Elementary, El Granada Elementary, Farallone View Elementary, Kings Mountain Elementary, Cunha Intermediate and Half Moon Bay High at $198 per parcel for eight years with senior citizen exemptions and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9706, "no_votes": 4002, "total_votes": 13708, "percent_yes": 70.80536912751678, "percent_no": 29.194630872483216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure adopts a replacement parcel tax of $198 per parcel for eight year...", "summary_text": "The measure adopts a replacement parcel tax of $198 per parcel for eight years to raise $2.14 million annually for Cabrillo Unified School District to fund teacher and staff wage increases and expand STEAM and college/career preparation programs. The tax includes senior citizen exemptions and requires public disclosure of spending.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.567576", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.051805", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1963, "fingerprint": "2024|202400736|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400736|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8fe6da4ebebca60b", "measure_id": "202400736", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Members of the San Bruno Park School District Board of Education be limited to serving no more than three (3) consecutive terms as a Board Member, either by election, appointment, or a combination thereof, and be ineligible to hold office as a Member of the San Bruno Park School District Board of Education again unless at least four years have passed since the end of that Member's third consecutive term?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12419, "no_votes": 2612, "total_votes": 15031, "percent_yes": 82.62258000133058, "percent_no": 17.377419998669424, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure limits San Bruno Park School District Board of Education members...", "summary_text": "This measure limits San Bruno Park School District Board of Education members to serving no more than three consecutive terms and requires them to wait at least four years after their third consecutive term before being eligible to serve again.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.570563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.052715", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1954, "fingerprint": "2024|202400727|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400727|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8d603b0df30ca7ef", "measure_id": "202400727", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Belmont-Redwood Shores School District's local elementary and middle schools; replace aging technology infrastructure for 21st century learning in science, engineering and math; repair or replace leaky roofs, heating and cooling systems; provide updated equipment for classrooms; shall Belmont-Redwood Shores School District's measure be adopted authorizing $171,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $29 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($11,400,000 annually), that cannot be taken away by the State, with citizen oversight, and annual audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13712, "no_votes": 6622, "total_votes": 20334, "percent_yes": 67.43385462771712, "percent_no": 32.566145372282875, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District to issue $1...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District to issue $171 million in bonds to fund infrastructure improvements including technology upgrades, roof repairs, heating and cooling system replacements, and classroom equipment updates at local elementary and middle schools. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $29 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.565631", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.051326", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1945, "fingerprint": "2024|202400392|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400392|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fd918efb3bb2442b", "measure_id": "202400392", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall City of San Bruno measure the adopted to repair deteriorating in storm-drains, preventing failure, flooding, water pollution/sinkholes; repair potholes/city streets; upgrade fire stations, improving emergency response, accommodate modern firefighting/lifesaving emergency medical equipment, function during earthquakes/natural disasters; authorizing $102,000,000 in bonds, at a tax rate of 3c per $100 of assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, initially generating $3,300,000 annually, without funds for administrators/ cannot be taken by the State of California, with citizen oversight/independent audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12703, "no_votes": 4677, "total_votes": 17380, "percent_yes": 73.08975834292289, "percent_no": 26.91024165707711, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of San Bruno to issue $102 million in bonds ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of San Bruno to issue $102 million in bonds to repair storm drains and city streets, upgrade fire stations for improved emergency response, and enhance infrastructure to function during earthquakes and natural disasters. The bonds would be funded by a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $3.3 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.444368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.998254", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11021, "fingerprint": "2024|202400387|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400387|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2717c720aff0a6ca", "measure_id": "202400387", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To help the City of Half Moon Bay maintain financial stability and essential services, such as maintaining 911 emergency response times, sheriff patrols, and disaster/emergency preparedness; keeping public places safe, healthy, and clean; reducing traffic congestion; and maintaining youth and recreation programs, shall a measure establishing a half-cent (0.5%) sales tax, providing approximately $2,000,000 annually for general revenue purposes until ended by voters, with annual audits/locally controlled funding, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3969, "no_votes": 2176, "total_votes": 6145, "percent_yes": 64.58909682668836, "percent_no": 35.41090317331164, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.5% sales tax in Half Moon Bay that would generate approximately $2 million annually for general city services including emergency response, public safety, traffic management, and recreation programs. The tax would remain in effect until voters decide to end it and includes provisions for annual audits and local control of funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.159423", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.442720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.997497", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1936, "fingerprint": "2024|202400381|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400381|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b96cf8cae76f6006", "measure_id": "202400381", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure R1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Angelina Callahan be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member of District 2?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 724, "no_votes": 297, "total_votes": 1021, "percent_yes": 70.91087169441724, "percent_no": 29.08912830558276, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Angelina Callahan from h...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Angelina Callahan from her position as Council Member of District 2 in San Mateo. The measure passed, resulting in Callahan's removal from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-07-23", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.440802", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.996582", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure R1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11020, "fingerprint": "2024|202400382|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400382|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "933d652d4969029d", "measure_id": "202400382", "measure_letter": "R2", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure R2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Maurice Goodman be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member of District 4?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1250, "no_votes": 363, "total_votes": 1613, "percent_yes": 77.49535027898327, "percent_no": 22.504649721016733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Maurice Goodman f...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Maurice Goodman from his position as Council Member for District 4 in San Mateo. The measure passed, resulting in Goodman's removal from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-07-23", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.158497", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.441127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.996732", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure R2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1962, "fingerprint": "2024|202400735|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400735|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a3448365ca018a07", "measure_id": "202400735", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund expanded preschool and early childhood education; reading, writing, and math instruction for elementary and middle school students; and teacher recruitment and retention; shall the Ravenswood City School District measure renewing and increasing an existing tax to $434 per parcel for 8 years, raising estimated revenue of $2,700,000 annually, adjusted for inflation, with an exemption for people aged 65 and older, all money staying local and subject to public oversight be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6249, "no_votes": 1696, "total_votes": 7945, "percent_yes": 78.65324103209565, "percent_no": 21.34675896790435, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews and increases an existing parcel tax in the Ravenswood Ci...", "summary_text": "This measure renews and increases an existing parcel tax in the Ravenswood City School District to $434 per parcel for 8 years to fund preschool programs, elementary and middle school instruction, and teacher recruitment, with an exemption for residents 65 and older. The tax is estimated to raise $2.7 million annually with inflation adjustments and includes provisions for local oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.570252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.052563", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1947, "fingerprint": "2024|202400394|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400394|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "27b644c415e62f19", "measure_id": "202400394", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to allow for additional affordable housing for low-and middle-income residents and meet State housing requirements (without raising taxes) while enhancing parks and open space, allowing existing residential neighborhoods to stay low density, and reducing traffic impacts, while allowing future housing to be concentrated primarily downtown along the El Camino corridor and near Caltrain stations where it is close to transit, jobs, infrastructure, and services be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25271, "no_votes": 17283, "total_votes": 42554, "percent_yes": 59.38572167128825, "percent_no": 40.61427832871175, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows for additional affordable housing for low- and middle-inc...", "summary_text": "This measure allows for additional affordable housing for low- and middle-income residents to meet state housing requirements by concentrating future housing development primarily in downtown areas along the El Camino corridor and near Caltrain stations. The measure also includes provisions for enhancing parks and open space while maintaining low density in existing residential neighborhoods.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.444999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.998556", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1959, "fingerprint": "2024|202400732|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400732|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7be171694938b02b", "measure_id": "202400732", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade Encinal, Laurel, Oak Knoll and Hillview schools, improve campus security, upgrade seismic safety, replace/repair aging buildings, acquire classroom air conditioning, and modernize learning technology, shall Menlo Park City School District's measure authorizing $123.6 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately $18.60 per$ l 00,000 of assessed value (raising $8.5 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizen oversight committee, no money for administrators, and all funds benefitting local public schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10174, "no_votes": 3962, "total_votes": 14136, "percent_yes": 71.97226938313526, "percent_no": 28.027730616864744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Menlo Park City School District to issue $123", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Menlo Park City School District to issue $123.6 million in bonds to upgrade four schools with improvements including seismic safety, security, air conditioning, technology modernization, and building repairs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $18.60 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising about $8.5 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.568634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.052109", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1940, "fingerprint": "2024|202400386|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400386|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "52cb19eb8b864672", "measure_id": "202400386", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect Foster City's financial stability and maintain essential services including 911 emergency response, property crime prevention, street repairs, and infrastructure maintenance, shall an ordinance amending the business license tax with varying the rates from $0.75 to $3.00 per $1000 of gross receipts, retaining the $100/$200 minimum tax and increasing the maximum tax payment both with annual inflation adjustments, generating approximately $1,400,000 annually for locally controlled general fund purposes, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9831, "no_votes": 3421, "total_votes": 13252, "percent_yes": 74.18502867491699, "percent_no": 25.814971325083008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Foster City's business license tax by setting rates from $0", "summary_text": "This measure amends Foster City's business license tax by setting rates from $0.75 to $3.00 per $1,000 of gross receipts while maintaining minimum taxes of $100-$200 and increasing the maximum tax payment, with annual inflation adjustments. The tax is expected to generate approximately $1.4 million annually for the city's general fund until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.442398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.997345", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1948, "fingerprint": "2024|202400395|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400395|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9a22a727bcade391", "measure_id": "202400395", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain City services, such as: fire protection/paramedic emergency Yes response; neighborhood police patrols and services; pothole, street and road maintenance; parks and recreation programs; library programs and services; and for general government use; shall the City of South San Francisco ordinance be adopted modernizing the business license tax, with increases in No rates varying with the size of the business, as described in the ordinance, providing approximately $2,600,000 annually, until ended by voters, with annual audits and citizens' oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19842, "no_votes": 4693, "total_votes": 24535, "percent_yes": 80.87222335439168, "percent_no": 19.12777664560832, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure modernized South San Francisco's business license tax with rate ...", "summary_text": "This measure modernized South San Francisco's business license tax with rate increases that vary by business size, generating approximately $2.6 million annually for city services including fire protection, police patrols, street maintenance, parks, recreation, and library programs. The measure includes provisions for annual audits and citizen oversight, with the tax continuing until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.445318", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.998707", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1964, "fingerprint": "2024|202400737|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400737|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6cfb1e517709ec80", "measure_id": "202400737", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide quality science, technology, engineering and math programs preparing students for success in high school, college and careers; attract and retain highly qualified teachers and counselors at local elementary and middle schools; and keep technology and educational materials up-to-date, shall San Bruno Park School District\u2019s measure be adopted levying $68 per parcel, for 8 years, generating $730,000 in annual school funding that can\u2019t be taken by the State, with senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11919, "no_votes": 3909, "total_votes": 15828, "percent_yes": 75.30326004548901, "percent_no": 24.69673995451099, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would levy a $68 annual parcel tax for 8 years to generate $730,...", "summary_text": "This measure would levy a $68 annual parcel tax for 8 years to generate $730,000 annually for the San Bruno Park School District to fund STEM programs, teacher and counselor retention, and updated technology and educational materials. The tax includes senior exemptions and independent citizen oversight, with funds remaining under local control.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.570876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.052873", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1965, "fingerprint": "2024|202400738|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400738|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f4a6f4bee7086291", "measure_id": "202400738", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and enhance Woodside School's academic excellence by providing quality instruction In math, science, reading/writing; attracting/retaining outstanding teachers; and maintaining low student-teacher ratio, shall Woodside Elementary School District's measure be adopted extending the District's existing school parcel tax, currently at $366. 66 per parcel (raising approximately $392,000 annually), for 12 years, without increasing the tax rate, as annually adjusted, with independent citizens' oversight, exempting those 65 years and older, and all funds spent only for Woodside School?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1536, "no_votes": 449, "total_votes": 1985, "percent_yes": 77.38035264483626, "percent_no": 22.619647355163735, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Woodside Elementary School District's existing parcel ta...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Woodside Elementary School District's existing parcel tax of $366.66 per parcel for 12 years without increasing the rate, raising approximately $392,000 annually for instruction, teacher retention, and maintaining low student-teacher ratios. The measure includes an exemption for residents 65 and older and requires independent oversight of funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.571177", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.053042", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1958, "fingerprint": "2024|202400731|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400731|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "dbe24b318b85724b", "measure_id": "202400731", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Jefferson Union High School District's measure to attract and retain highly qualified teachers, counselors, and staff; offer more competitive wages and benefits; and expand classes for career training/college preparedness at Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, and Westmoor High Schoolsbe adopted, replacing its expiring annual parcel tax at $95 per parcel for ten years (raising $3.3 million annually) with senior citizen exemptions, and public disdosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38447, "no_votes": 11506, "total_votes": 49953, "percent_yes": 76.96634836746541, "percent_no": 23.033651632534585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure replaces Jefferson Union High School District's expiring annual ...", "summary_text": "This measure replaces Jefferson Union High School District's expiring annual parcel tax with a new $95 per parcel tax for ten years to fund teacher and staff compensation, competitive wages and benefits, and expanded career training and college preparatory classes. The measure passed and is expected to raise $3.3 million annually with senior citizen exemptions and public disclosure requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.568104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.051957", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1967, "fingerprint": "2024|202400396|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400396|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "794a95a3ae904a20", "measure_id": "202400396", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Council proposed measure to amend City Charter Section 519 to modernize public works contracting be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15810, "no_votes": 5774, "total_votes": 21584, "percent_yes": 73.24870274277242, "percent_no": 26.751297257227577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Contracting/Bidding/Leasing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends City Charter Section 519 to update the city's public works...", "summary_text": "The measure amends City Charter Section 519 to update the city's public works contracting procedures and requirements.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.445633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.998859", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1970, "fingerprint": "2024|202400399|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400399|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d13168881c4e7da2", "measure_id": "202400399", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure protecting essential services including maintaining safe/clean public areas; repairing streets; addressing homelessness; emergency/disaster preparedness; maintaining sheriff's deputies; preserving library, senior, and youth programs; protecting beaches from pollution; other general government purposes; increasing Carpinteria's transient occupancy tax, paid only by hotel/motel/short-term rental guests, from 12% to 15%, generating $750,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring spending disclosures, all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4673, "no_votes": 1512, "total_votes": 6185, "percent_yes": 75.55375909458367, "percent_no": 24.44624090541633, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Carpinteria's transient occupancy tax from 12% to 15%,...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Carpinteria's transient occupancy tax from 12% to 15%, which is paid by guests staying in hotels, motels, and short-term rentals, generating an estimated $750,000 annually for general government services. The tax revenue would fund various city services including public safety, street repairs, homelessness programs, emergency preparedness, libraries, and beach protection.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.446571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.999308", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1968, "fingerprint": "2024|202400397|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400397|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "c727bcc8817cbd1d", "measure_id": "202400397", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Should the Buellton General Plan be Amended Until December 31, 2036, to Expand the Area within the Existing Urban Growth Boundary by Approximately 123 Acres (Allowing for Potential Expansion of City Limits within the Expanded Area) but Prohibit Other Changes to the City Limits or the Provision of Municipal Services Beyond the Amended Urban Growth Boundary Line Except by Another Initiative Election?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1549, "no_votes": 1082, "total_votes": 2631, "percent_yes": 58.8749524895477, "percent_no": 41.1250475104523, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Buellton's General Plan through December 31, 2036, to exp...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Buellton's General Plan through December 31, 2036, to expand the existing Urban Growth Boundary by approximately 123 acres, allowing for potential expansion of city limits within that area. The measure prohibits other changes to city limits or extension of municipal services beyond the amended boundary line unless approved by another initiative election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.445955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.999009", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1969, "fingerprint": "2024|202400398|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400398|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "46c6b273fb997fee", "measure_id": "202400398", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Section 3.28.030 of the Buellton Municipal Code be amended to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate, which applies only to transient occupants of hotels (as defined in Section 3.28.020), from twelve percent (12%) to fourteen percent (14%) for a period of 25 years, after which it shall revert to twelve percent (12%) unless extended by the voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1364, "no_votes": 1153, "total_votes": 2517, "percent_yes": 54.191497814858955, "percent_no": 45.808502185141045, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Buellton's transient occupancy tax on hotel stays from...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Buellton's transient occupancy tax on hotel stays from 12% to 14% for a 25-year period, after which it would revert to the original 12% rate unless voters approve an extension. The tax applies only to temporary hotel guests as defined in the municipal code.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.446246", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.999159", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1974, "fingerprint": "2024|202400403|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400403|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d43fce73635ba38e", "measure_id": "202400403", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue funding for Solvang tourism related services, such as: pothole, street/ sidewalk repair; traffic safety, parking relief; senior, adult/ youth recreation programs; 911 response; and general government use, shall the City adopt a measure increasing Solvang\u2019s existing transient occupancy (hotel) tax charged to hotel guests only, by 2% until ended by voters, providing an additional $1,000,000 annually, that cannot be taken by Sacramento, with citizens' oversight, independent audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2077, "no_votes": 1015, "total_votes": 3092, "percent_yes": 67.17335058214748, "percent_no": 32.82664941785252, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases Solvang's transient occupancy tax on hotel guests by 2%...", "summary_text": "The measure increases Solvang's transient occupancy tax on hotel guests by 2% to generate approximately $1,000,000 annually for tourism-related services including street repair, traffic safety, recreation programs, and emergency response. The tax increase continues indefinitely until ended by voters and includes provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.447837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.999915", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1971, "fingerprint": "2024|202400400|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400400|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "8059a10219af48be", "measure_id": "202400400", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure be adopted extending the term of Measure \"G2012\" (\"Heritage Farmlands Initiative\"), requiring a majority vote of the people to redesignate or change the intensity of use for agricultural parcels within the City of Goleta of ten ore more acres, by twenty additional years upon the expiration of the term of Measure \"G2012\" and to take effect on December 31, 2032?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10665, "no_votes": 3880, "total_votes": 14545, "percent_yes": 73.32416638019939, "percent_no": 26.675833619800613, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends the existing \"Heritage Farmlands Initiative\" (Measure G2...", "summary_text": "This measure extends the existing \"Heritage Farmlands Initiative\" (Measure G2012) for an additional twenty years, continuing to require majority voter approval before agricultural parcels of ten or more acres within the City of Goleta can be redesignated or have their use intensity changed. The extension would take effect on December 31, 2032, when the current measure expires.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.446893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.999459", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1966, "fingerprint": "2024|202400092|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400092|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "cb411b043e3474f7", "measure_id": "202400092", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund local services such as: maintaining 911 emergency communications; gang prevention; repairing deteriorating bridges, potholes, roads, transportation infrastructure; protecting groundwater; addressing homelessness; and general county services/purposes, shall the ordinance increasing Santa Barbara County's Transient Occupancy Tax (paid only by hotel/ short-term rental guests), in unincorporated areas (excluding cities), from 12% to 14%, providing approximately $3,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring public audits; all funds locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115336, "no_votes": 56443, "total_votes": 171779, "percent_yes": 67.14208372385448, "percent_no": 32.85791627614552, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Santa Barbara County's transient occupancy tax from 12...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Santa Barbara County's transient occupancy tax from 12% to 14% for hotel and short-term rental guests in unincorporated areas, generating approximately $3 million annually. The revenue would fund local services including emergency communications, infrastructure repairs, gang prevention, groundwater protection, homelessness programs, and general county services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.342899", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.950032", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1973, "fingerprint": "2024|202400402|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400402|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d5240f18205c6451", "measure_id": "202400402", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure maintaining 9-1-1 emergency/fire/paramedic/police response, keeping neighborhood fire stations open; improving housing affordability; addressing homelessness; keeping public areas/parks safe, clean; maintaining library services; stormwater protection; improving natural disaster preparedness; retaining local businesses/jobs, and for general government use; by establishing a 1/2 cent sales tax providing approximately $15,600,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, public spending disclosure, all funds used locall , be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25439, "no_votes": 14673, "total_votes": 40112, "percent_yes": 63.41992421220583, "percent_no": 36.58007578779417, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.5% sales tax in Santa Barbara that would generate approximately $15.6 million annually for general government services including emergency services, fire and police response, libraries, parks, homelessness programs, and disaster preparedness. The tax would remain in effect until repealed by voters and includes requirements for audits and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.447502", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.999763", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1979, "fingerprint": "2024|202400743|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400743|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "489922d58a73cdac", "measure_id": "202400743", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide up-to-date classrooms/labs/career training facilities that prepare students for college and in-demand careers in science, engineering, technology, skilled trades; make student safety/school security improvements; replace aging portables; and construct school facilities to relieve overcrowding, shall Santa Maria Joint Union High School District's measure authorizing $194,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, be adopted, levying approximately $24/$100,000 assessed valuation ($13,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight/audits/all funds controlled locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24467, "no_votes": 21371, "total_votes": 45838, "percent_yes": 53.37711069418386, "percent_no": 46.62288930581614, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Santa Maria Joint Union High School Di...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Santa Maria Joint Union High School District to issue $194 million in bonds to fund classroom and laboratory upgrades, safety improvements, portable replacement, and new facilities to address overcrowding. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes of approximately $24 per $100,000 of assessed valuation annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.572771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.053937", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1980, "fingerprint": "2024|202400744|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400744|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "300d693db70a32ea", "measure_id": "202400744", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair, modernize, and construct elementary/junior-high school classrooms, science labs, and facilities that reduce overcrowding and support student achievement in science, technology, reading, writing, arts, and math; improve school safety/security; and fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, infrastructure, shall Santa Maria-Bonita School District's measure authorizing $77,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, be adopted, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value (averaging $5,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14521, "no_votes": 8777, "total_votes": 23298, "percent_yes": 62.32723838956134, "percent_no": 37.67276161043866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Santa Maria-Bonita School District to issue $77 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Santa Maria-Bonita School District to issue $77 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct school facilities including classrooms, science labs, and infrastructure improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.573062", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.054359", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1975, "fingerprint": "2024|202400739|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400739|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "8f5ce11b4a44b427", "measure_id": "202400739", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair aging classrooms/school facilities to meet health and safety codes; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical; remove asbestos/lead pipes; and upgrade, construct and equip classrooms, labs, facilities to support student achievement in science, math, technology, engineering, and arts; shall the College School District measure authorizing $18,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $19 per $100,000 assessed value ($1 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1804, "no_votes": 1656, "total_votes": 3460, "percent_yes": 52.138728323699425, "percent_no": 47.861271676300575, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the College School District to issue $18 m...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the College School District to issue $18 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including fixing roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, removing hazardous materials, and constructing new classrooms and labs. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of $19 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.571469", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.053197", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1977, "fingerprint": "2024|202400741|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400741|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "32ae4040c7402fbe", "measure_id": "202400741", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade classrooms, labs, career-training facilities/technology to prepare students for college/careers in science, technology, engineering/ skilled trades; improve student safety/campus security; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical/ventilation; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, sites/ equipment, shall Lompoc Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $160,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($9,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with oversight, audits, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11726, "no_votes": 7930, "total_votes": 19656, "percent_yes": 59.65608465608465, "percent_no": 40.34391534391535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Lompoc Unified School District to issue $160 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Lompoc Unified School District to issue $160 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, labs, career training facilities, and infrastructure systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 5 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $9 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.572186", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.053500", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1978, "fingerprint": "2024|202400742|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400742|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "6893a79d0fb34e2f", "measure_id": "202400742", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and update aging classrooms, labs, college/ career-training facilities providing affordable, high-quality education in science, engineering, math, nursing, technology/ skilled trades; and fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing/ electrical, shall Santa Barbara Community College District's measure be adopted authorizing $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, without exceeding the previously approved $8.50 per $100,000 assessed value (providing $13,255,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with oversight/ local control?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62805, "no_votes": 32133, "total_votes": 94938, "percent_yes": 66.15370030967578, "percent_no": 33.846299690324216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Santa Barbara Community College District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Santa Barbara Community College District to issue $198 million in bonds to repair and update aging classrooms, labs, and career training facilities, as well as fix deteriorating infrastructure like roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes not exceeding $8.50 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.572481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.053661", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1972, "fingerprint": "2024|202400401|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400401|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "5ae156031b5db432", "measure_id": "202400401", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, which would discontinue the public park use of the 82-acre parcel containing Ken Adam Park in order to allow other educational and recreational uses or other open space uses, or both, to be considered for establishment on the parcel, including a potential space-themed educational center, and to allow sale of the parcel for those uses, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6940, "no_votes": 5850, "total_votes": 12790, "percent_yes": 54.26114151681001, "percent_no": 45.73885848318999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows Santa Barbara to discontinue the public park designation ...", "summary_text": "This measure allows Santa Barbara to discontinue the public park designation of the 82-acre Ken Adam Park property and permits the city to consider alternative educational, recreational, or open space uses for the site, including potentially selling the land for such purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.447181", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.999608", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1976, "fingerprint": "2024|202400740|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400740|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "eae7bf3a4ddb4da6", "measure_id": "202400740", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms/school facilities; make health, safety/security improvements to improve the quality of education; acquire, construct/equip school sites/facilities, shall Hope Elementary School District's measure be adopted issuing $40,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,500,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $18.26 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5040, "no_votes": 3446, "total_votes": 8486, "percent_yes": 59.39193966533113, "percent_no": 40.60806033466887, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Hope Elementary School District to issue $40,300,...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Hope Elementary School District to issue $40,300,000 in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, as well as make health, safety, and security improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $18.26 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating about $2,500,000 annually until paid off.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.571819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.053348", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11025, "fingerprint": "2024|202400746|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400746|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c8cef41a150253ec", "measure_id": "202400746", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers, maintain strong core academic programs and high- quality science, technology, engineering, and math courses, support high student achievement and prepare students for top colleges and careers, shall LosGatos-SaratogaUnionHighSchoolDistrict\u2019s measure be adopted, renewing its expiring education parcel tax at the current $49, plus $79/ parcel, providing $2,520,000 annually for nine years, with annual adjustments, citizen oversight, senior exemptions, no funds for administrators, and every dollar benefiting local high schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7196, "no_votes": 3424, "total_votes": 10620, "percent_yes": 67.75894538606403, "percent_no": 32.24105461393597, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews and increases an education parcel tax for the Los Gatos-S...", "summary_text": "This measure renews and increases an education parcel tax for the Los Gatos-Saratoga Union High School District from $49 to $128 per parcel annually, generating approximately $2.52 million per year for nine years to fund teacher retention, academic programs, and STEM courses. The measure passed and includes provisions for annual adjustments, citizen oversight, senior exemptions, and restrictions on using funds for administrative purposes.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-05-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.169597", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.573749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.054918", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11022, "fingerprint": "2024|202400409|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400409|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "14905f9b8fdb7af5", "measure_id": "202400409", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the Morgan Hill Municipal Code to establish a twelve consecutive year limit on combined mayoral, city council, and treasurer service be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16332, "no_votes": 4370, "total_votes": 20702, "percent_yes": 78.89092841271375, "percent_no": 21.10907158728625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 12-consecutive-year limit on combined service as m...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 12-consecutive-year limit on combined service as mayor, city council member, and treasurer in Morgan Hill. Officials who reach this limit would be prohibited from serving in any of these positions until taking a break from municipal office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.168086", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.449925", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.000857", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1981, "fingerprint": "2024|202400404|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400404|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "dfac256b08bf35a7", "measure_id": "202400404", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an amendment to the City Charter providing that the City Clerk position be appointed by the City Manager be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6580, "no_votes": 13735, "total_votes": 20315, "percent_yes": 32.3898597095742, "percent_no": 67.61014029042579, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.448155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.000083", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2004, "fingerprint": "2024|202400760|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400760|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6aa67310929b4e91", "measure_id": "202400760", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain local funding for high-quality elementary and middle schools; attract and retain qualified teachers; provide academic support for students struggling with reading and writing; and enhance science, technology, engineering, arts and math programs; shall Mountain View Whisman School District's measure renewing parcel tax authority at $0.15/building area square foot capped at $1,750/parcel and $25/unimproved parcel, to be adopted, raising approximately $5,400,000 annually for 8 years, with senior exemptions, citizens' oversight, and funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19275, "no_votes": 6330, "total_votes": 25605, "percent_yes": 75.27826596367898, "percent_no": 24.721734036321024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure renews the Mountain View Whisman School District's parcel tax at $0", "summary_text": "The measure renews the Mountain View Whisman School District's parcel tax at $0.15 per square foot of building area (capped at $1,750 per parcel) and $25 for unimproved parcels for 8 years, raising approximately $5.4 million annually. The funds would support elementary and middle school operations, teacher retention, student academic support, and STEAM programs, with senior exemptions and citizen oversight included.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.578603", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.058336", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11023, "fingerprint": "2024|202400410|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400410|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c387abaf29812911", "measure_id": "202400410", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to have the term of office for the directly elected Mayor of Morgan Hill be four years rather than the current two years be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11265, "no_votes": 9667, "total_votes": 20932, "percent_yes": 53.81712210968852, "percent_no": 46.18287789031148, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends the term of office for the directly elected Mayor of Mor...", "summary_text": "This measure extends the term of office for the directly elected Mayor of Morgan Hill from two years to four years. The measure was adopted by voters in 2024.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.168272", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.450223", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.001005", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1982, "fingerprint": "2024|202400405|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400405|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9faecebc7638a8e1", "measure_id": "202400405", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an amendment to the City Charter providing that the Chief of Police position be appointed by the City Manager be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5680, "no_votes": 14887, "total_votes": 20567, "percent_yes": 27.617056449652356, "percent_no": 72.38294355034765, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended Santa Clara's City Charter to change the appoi...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended Santa Clara's City Charter to change the appointment process for the Chief of Police position from its current method to appointment by the City Manager.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.448514", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.000233", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1991, "fingerprint": "2024|202400747|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400747|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "dd9cce0624f1df26", "measure_id": "202400747", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) To continue to provide Cambrian neighborhood elementary and middle school students with stable funding for instruction in math, science, reading, engineering, technology, and arts, retaining highly qualified teachers, and maintaining manageable class sizes, should Cambrian School District continue the annual parcel tax that was approved by 67 percent of voters in 2018 (with no changes), with exemptions for seniors, no funds for administrators' salaries, and every dollar benefitting Cambrian children?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10183, "no_votes": 3032, "total_votes": 13215, "percent_yes": 77.0563753310632, "percent_no": 22.943624668936806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.574109", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.055184", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11024, "fingerprint": "2024|202400745|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400745|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ceef6f1cb50ce783", "measure_id": "202400745", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue critical renovation and modernization of local elementary and middle schools, upgrade schools safety/security, improve access to technology, and ensure accessibility for students with disabilities, shall Sunnyvale School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $214 million in bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average of $13.2 million annually for approximately 34 years, at a projected rate of $15 per $100,000 assessed value, with oversight, accountability, all funds benefiting schools, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10261, "no_votes": 4395, "total_votes": 14656, "percent_yes": 70.01228165938865, "percent_no": 29.98771834061135, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Sunnyvale School District to issue $214 million i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Sunnyvale School District to issue $214 million in bonds to renovate and modernize elementary and middle schools, upgrade safety and security systems, improve technology access, and ensure accessibility for students with disabilities. The bonds would be repaid over approximately 34 years through property taxes at a projected rate of $15 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.169407", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.573381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.054634", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1984, "fingerprint": "2024|202400407|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400407|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "28e0f831776b316e", "measure_id": "202400407", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To generate funding that cannot be seized by the State, but stays in Gilroy and is dedicated to public safety (police, fire and ambulance) services and public safety infrastructure projects, shall Gilroy enact a 0.25 percent (one-quarter of one percent) transactions and use tax; and include a citizen oversight committee and annual audits for the tax?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13438, "no_votes": 8772, "total_votes": 22210, "percent_yes": 60.5042773525439, "percent_no": 39.4957226474561, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted a 0.25% sales tax in Gilroy dedicated to funding police, fire, and ambulance services along with public safety infrastructure projects. The tax revenue would have been subject to citizen oversight and annual audits, with funds required to remain within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.449217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.000544", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1999, "fingerprint": "2024|202400755|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400755|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0a685cf363fee067", "measure_id": "202400755", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local elementary and middle schools by upgrading classrooms for literacy programs, science, technology, engineering, arts and math; updating school safety/ security systems; and replacing outdated heating, cooling, electrical, and ventilation systems; shall Los Gatos Union School District's measure be adopted, authorizing $163 million in bonds at legal Interest rates, levying $30 per $100,000 of assessed value (averaging $11.5 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with audits, independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10682, "no_votes": 5410, "total_votes": 16092, "percent_yes": 66.38081034054188, "percent_no": 33.619189659458115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Los Gatos Union School District to issue $163 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Los Gatos Union School District to issue $163 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, update safety and security systems, and replace outdated infrastructure including heating, cooling, electrical, and ventilation systems at local elementary and middle schools. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.576759", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.057127", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1987, "fingerprint": "2024|202400412|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400412|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b31001b7cb7da3cf", "measure_id": "202400412", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To reduce traffic congestion and travel time for transit riders, shall the measure undedicating a 0.33-acre portion of existing parkland in El Camino Park for the purpose of creating a new road primarily for transit vehicles linking the Palo Alto Transit Center with El Camino Real, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22806, "no_votes": 8107, "total_votes": 30913, "percent_yes": 73.77478730631127, "percent_no": 26.225212693688732, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure undedicates 0", "summary_text": "The measure undedicates 0.33 acres of El Camino Park to create a new road primarily for transit vehicles that would connect the Palo Alto Transit Center with El Camino Real. The stated purpose is to reduce traffic congestion and travel time for transit riders.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.450801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.001305", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1989, "fingerprint": "2024|202400414|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400414|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1cfbfc304f11089c", "measure_id": "202400414", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide residents an accessible modern, sustainable, earthquake-safe library; expand spaces for: collections, events, educational programs for children, teens and seniors; replace deteriorating plumbing, electrical, roofing; shall the measure of the City of Sunnyvale to issue $290,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with a maximum levy of $27.47 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding, generating approximately $18,600,000 annually, with audits, citizen's oversight, all funds used locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29503, "no_votes": 20260, "total_votes": 49763, "percent_yes": 59.28702047706127, "percent_no": 40.71297952293873, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the City of Sunnyvale to issue $290 million...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the City of Sunnyvale to issue $290 million in bonds to renovate and modernize the city's library facilities, including structural improvements and expanded programming spaces. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a maximum rate of $27.47 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.451533", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.001608", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1998, "fingerprint": "2024|202400754|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400754|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e611a2cefb85f7b5", "measure_id": "202400754", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure EE", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade aging neighborhood schools, enhance science, technology, engineering, and math classrooms/labs, fix leaky roofs/windows, improve school traffic safety, update aging heating, cooling/plumbing, and construct facilities needed to preserve small neighborhood schools; shall Los Altos School District's measure authorizing $350,000,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying an average $30 per $100,000 assessed value (approximately $20,300,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, all funds for local elementary/junior high schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13032, "no_votes": 10153, "total_votes": 23185, "percent_yes": 56.208755660987705, "percent_no": 43.791244339012295, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Los Altos School District to issue $350 million i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Los Altos School District to issue $350 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including classroom upgrades, infrastructure repairs, safety enhancements, and construction of new facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.576463", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.056890", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure EE", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1990, "fingerprint": "2024|202400415|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400415|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "681e0fbce85db5e4", "measure_id": "202400415", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Sunnyvale City Charter be amended to (1) eliminate the voter registration/citizenship requirement for members of all boards and commissions to remove barriers to volunteering; (2) change the required City Council meeting frequency from 2 meetings per month to at least 24 meetings per year, with no more than 6 weeks between meetings, to provide more scheduling flexibility; and (3) replace gendered references throughout the charter with gender-neutral language?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17959, "no_votes": 29577, "total_votes": 47536, "percent_yes": 37.779787950185124, "percent_no": 62.220212049814876, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.451827", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.001770", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1986, "fingerprint": "2024|202400411|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400411|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f6ef79233350f8e1", "measure_id": "202400411", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to provide additional funding for services that protect local property values, including 911 emergency medical/disaster response; street, sidewalk and pothole repairs, affordable housing support, and other general government services, by raising the City of Mountain View's existing voter-approved property transfer tax, imposed on residential/commercial property sales above $6,000,000 only, up to $15.00 per $1,000, generating about $9,500,000 in locally controlled funding annually until ended by voters, with independent audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21330, "no_votes": 8162, "total_votes": 29492, "percent_yes": 72.32469822324698, "percent_no": 27.675301776753017, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure raises Mountain View's property transfer tax on residential and c...", "summary_text": "The measure raises Mountain View's property transfer tax on residential and commercial property sales above $6,000,000 to up to $15.00 per $1,000 of sale price to fund city services including emergency response, infrastructure repairs, and affordable housing. It is expected to generate approximately $9.5 million annually in locally controlled revenue subject to independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.450513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.001154", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2005, "fingerprint": "2024|202400761|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400761|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "83e1db94f2c0693e", "measure_id": "202400761", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure GG", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide a safe, modern neighborhood school; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, heating and cooling systems; upgrade classrooms; improve student safety and security systems; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, equipment, sites and facilities; shall Orchard School District's measure be adopted authorizing $30,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $12 per $100,000 assessed value ($2,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent audits, citizen oversight, public disclosure of all spending and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3023, "no_votes": 1147, "total_votes": 4170, "percent_yes": 72.49400479616307, "percent_no": 27.50599520383693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Orchard School District to issue $30 million in b...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Orchard School District to issue $30 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including fixing roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and improving classrooms and safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $12 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.578889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.058569", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure GG", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1997, "fingerprint": "2024|202400753|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400753|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c7871c30d73d638d", "measure_id": "202400753", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure HH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prevent Lakeside School from closure, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, protect core academic programs in reading, writing and math, and support innovative science, technology and engineering programs, shall Lakeside Joint School District's measure be adopted, renewing expiring local funding without increasing the current $647 rate, providing $500,000 annually for 8 years that cannot be taken by the State, with senior exemptions, annual adjustments, citizens' oversight, no funds for administrators and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 244, "no_votes": 117, "total_votes": 361, "percent_yes": 67.59002770083103, "percent_no": 32.40997229916897, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews expiring local property tax funding for Lakeside Joint Sc...", "summary_text": "This measure renews expiring local property tax funding for Lakeside Joint School District at the current rate of $647, providing $500,000 annually for 8 years to support academic programs and prevent school closure. The funding includes provisions for senior exemptions, citizen oversight, and restrictions on administrative use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.576114", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.056643", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure HH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1988, "fingerprint": "2024|202400413|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400413|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "794bf46db7bd1982", "measure_id": "202400413", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve 911 emergency response; fix streets to reduce potholes and provide safer roads and routes for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists; upgrade stormdrains/pipes to prevent flooding/sinkholes; and renovate/replace recreation, library and other community facilities; shall the City of Santa Clara's measure authorizing $400,000,000 in bonds, funded by levying an estimated $19 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding, generating approximately $21,674,000 annually, with annual audits and citizen oversight of spending, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28133, "no_votes": 12399, "total_votes": 40532, "percent_yes": 69.40935557090694, "percent_no": 30.59064442909306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of Santa Clara to issue $400 million in bond...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of Santa Clara to issue $400 million in bonds to fund infrastructure improvements including emergency response systems, street repairs, stormwater facilities, and community facility renovations. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes estimated at $19 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.451149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.001455", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1985, "fingerprint": "2024|202400408|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400408|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0e9531844cd0be0a", "measure_id": "202400408", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain fiscal stability and essential City services, including 911 emergency response, police and fire protection; repairing streets/fixing potholes; tracking/investigating crime; addressing homeless encampments/affordable housing needs; natural disaster/emergency preparation; maintaining neighborhood parks/public infrastructure, shall the measure continuing the existing voter-approved \u00bc-cent sales tax be adopted, providing approximately $7,000,000 annually for eight additional years, requiring independent audits, public disclosure, and all funds controlled locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19582, "no_votes": 4850, "total_votes": 24432, "percent_yes": 80.14898493778651, "percent_no": 19.85101506221349, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues an existing quarter-cent sales tax in Santa Clara for ...", "summary_text": "This measure continues an existing quarter-cent sales tax in Santa Clara for eight additional years, generating approximately $7 million annually for general city services including emergency response, police, fire protection, street repairs, and parks maintenance. The measure requires independent audits and public disclosure of how the funds are used.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.449545", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.000694", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1983, "fingerprint": "2024|202400406|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400406|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c61444c34cf75a19", "measure_id": "202400406", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure providing funding for Campbell's fiscal stability and general government services, such as: police/fire protection; 911 emergency medical response; road and storm drain repairs; disaster preparation; homeless services; recreation programs; keeping public spaces and parks safe/clean, by establishing a locally controlled 1 /2\u00a2 transaction and use (sales) tax providing approximately $7,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring independent audits and public disclosure of spending, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13519, "no_votes": 5245, "total_votes": 18764, "percent_yes": 72.04753783841399, "percent_no": 27.952462161586013, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.5% local sales tax in Campbell, California to fund general government services including police, fire, emergency medical response, road repairs, homeless services, and parks maintenance, generating approximately $7 million annually. The tax includes requirements for independent audits and public spending disclosure, and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.448924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.000381", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2006, "fingerprint": "2024|202400762|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400762|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1ecd763089882a34", "measure_id": "202400762", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide high-quality education and instructional opportunities for local students at a second high school by creating classrooms and labs for vocational, college readiness and career pathways, agriculture, technology, core academics, and early college/ vocational classes with Gavilan College, shall San Benito High School District's measure be adopted authorizing $70,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $19/ $100,000 assessed value ($4,450,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27, "no_votes": 25, "total_votes": 52, "percent_yes": 51.92307692307693, "percent_no": 48.07692307692307, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the San Benito High School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the San Benito High School District to issue $70 million in bonds to build a second high school with classrooms and labs for vocational training, college readiness, agriculture, technology, and core academics. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes averaging $19 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.579211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.058828", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2007, "fingerprint": "2024|202400763|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400763|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1552096cfc3e443e", "measure_id": "202400763", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To relieve overcrowding at Hollister High and provide local high school students access to safe, quality education, Including math, science, engineering, technology, other core academics, hands-on job skills, and career/ college readiness; and improve student safety by adding a second local high school, shall San Benito High School District's measure be adopted authorizing $70,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $19/ $100,000 assessed value ($4,450,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30, "no_votes": 22, "total_votes": 52, "percent_yes": 57.692307692307686, "percent_no": 42.307692307692314, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Benito High School District to issue $70 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Benito High School District to issue $70 million in bonds to build a second local high school to address overcrowding at Hollister High School. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $19 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.579523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.059058", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1994, "fingerprint": "2024|202400750|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400750|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "99997df582793f4b", "measure_id": "202400750", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall East Side Union High School District's parcel tax to protect career technical education and college preparation programs and maintain competitive wages and benefits for teachers and staff at Andrew Hill, Calero, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Yerba Buena and W.C. Overfelt High Schools be adopted at $49 per parcel, raising $6.4 million annually for five years, with senior exemptions and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126490, "no_votes": 47061, "total_votes": 173551, "percent_yes": 72.8834751744444, "percent_no": 27.1165248255556, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopts a $49 annual parcel tax for five years in the East Side U...", "summary_text": "This measure adopts a $49 annual parcel tax for five years in the East Side Union High School District to fund career technical education, college preparation programs, and teacher compensation, raising approximately $6.4 million annually. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and requires public disclosure of spending, with funds protected from state appropriation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.575100", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.055904", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1992, "fingerprint": "2024|202400748|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400748|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "fc505de309c958d9", "measure_id": "202400748", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ upgrade high school classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities, and instructional technology to support college/ career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts, and skilled trades; modernize older facilities; and improve security systems, fire alarms, access for students with disabilities, shall Campbell Union High School District's measure authorizing $474,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $24 per $100,000 assessed value (raising $27,500,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits and all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58648, "no_votes": 31949, "total_votes": 90597, "percent_yes": 64.73503537644734, "percent_no": 35.26496462355266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Campbell Union High School District to issue $474...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Campbell Union High School District to issue $474 million in bonds to repair and upgrade high school facilities including classrooms, labs, career-training facilities, technology, and accessibility features. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of $24 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising approximately $27.5 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.574436", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.055427", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2000, "fingerprint": "2024|202400756|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400756|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "19c7875f6d5e50ea", "measure_id": "202400756", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain high-quality local schools; protect essential programs in science, technology, engineering, athletics, and math; provide educator training and tools to prepare students for college, careers and community leadership; and retain school counselors and health professionals for student mental-physical wellness, shall Milpitas Unified School District's measure levying $119 per parcel annually be adopted, providing approximately $2,200,000 annually for eight years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting local students?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17303, "no_votes": 6962, "total_votes": 24265, "percent_yes": 71.30846898825469, "percent_no": 28.69153101174531, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies $119 per parcel annually for eight years to provide appro...", "summary_text": "This measure levies $119 per parcel annually for eight years to provide approximately $2,200,000 annually to the Milpitas Unified School District for educational programs, staff, and student services. The funds cannot be used for administrator salaries and include provisions for senior exemptions and independent oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.577132", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.057389", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2008, "fingerprint": "2024|202400764|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400764|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a62bb5638329aa69", "measure_id": "202400764", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve school safety, upgrade neighborhood schools and classrooms for science, technology, engineering, math, athletics and multipurpose use; update electrical, roofing, ventilation, and plumbing systems, and provide affordable housing to attract and retain high-quality teachers/ staff, shall San Jose Unified School District's measure be adopted issuing $1,150,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (approximately $81,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66759, "no_votes": 36365, "total_votes": 103124, "percent_yes": 64.73662774911757, "percent_no": 35.263372250882426, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Jose Unified School District to issue $1", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Jose Unified School District to issue $1.15 billion in bonds to fund school safety improvements, facility upgrades for STEM and athletics programs, infrastructure updates, and affordable housing for district employees. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.579805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.059287", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2002, "fingerprint": "2024|202400758|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400758|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "922fe762049a78b8", "measure_id": "202400758", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Mount Pleasant Elementary School District's measure to expand Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics classrooms; and update classroom technology and emergency communication systems at August Boeger Middle, Ida Jew Academy, Mount Pleasant Elementary, Robert Sanders Elementary, and Valle Vista Elementary be adopted, authorizing $28 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (generating $1.7 million annually) while outstanding, citizen oversight, and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5018, "no_votes": 2142, "total_votes": 7160, "percent_yes": 70.08379888268156, "percent_no": 29.916201117318437, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Mount Pleasant Elementary School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Mount Pleasant Elementary School District to issue $28 million in bonds to expand STEAM classrooms and update classroom technology and emergency communication systems at five schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging below $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.577758", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.057856", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2003, "fingerprint": "2024|202400759|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400759|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e64eb6b7a3d8f263", "measure_id": "202400759", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Mount Pleasant Elementary School District's measure to expand student counseling/ mental health facilities; ensure access for disabled individuals; renovate outdated libraries; and repair leaky roofs at August Boeger Middle, Ida Jew Academy, Mount Pleasant Elementary, Robert Sanders Elementary, and Valle Vista Elementary be adopted, authorizing $24 million of bonds with legal rates, average levies below $26 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (generating $1.45 million annually) while outstanding, citizen oversight, and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5043, "no_votes": 2115, "total_votes": 7158, "percent_yes": 70.45264040234701, "percent_no": 29.547359597652985, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Mount Pleasant Elementary School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Mount Pleasant Elementary School District to issue $24 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including expanding counseling and mental health facilities, ensuring disability access, renovating libraries, and repairing roofs at five schools. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging below $26 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.578238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.058118", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2001, "fingerprint": "2024|202400757|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400757|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8f3842f1e1eb5f69", "measure_id": "202400757", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renew expiring funding for neighborhood elementary and middle schools without increasing tax rates; maintain quality education by attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers; strengthening reading, math, arts, and science programs; and keeping school libraries open, shall Moreland School District's measure be adopted, renewing its expiring $142 annual parcel tax, without increase, providing $1,500,000 annually for 8 years, that cannot be taken by the State, exempting seniors, with independent oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13953, "no_votes": 4112, "total_votes": 18065, "percent_yes": 77.23775256019928, "percent_no": 22.762247439800717, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an existing $142 annual parcel tax in the Moreland School...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an existing $142 annual parcel tax in the Moreland School District for 8 years without increasing the rate, providing $1.5 million annually for educational programs including reading, math, arts, science, and school libraries. The measure includes exemptions for seniors, independent oversight, and prohibits using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.577462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.057622", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2010, "fingerprint": "2024|202400766|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400766|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "056b0b13abd4488d", "measure_id": "202400766", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers and counselors at local elementary/middle schools; maintain manageable class sizes; and continue funding high quality programs in math, science, engineering, technology, music, and arts; shall Union Elementary School District's measure replacing the expiring school parcel tax for seven years be adopted at $148 per parcel, generating approximately $2,000,000 in annual school funding that cannot be taken away by the State, with senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14799, "no_votes": 6181, "total_votes": 20980, "percent_yes": 70.53860819828408, "percent_no": 29.46139180171592, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure replaces an expiring parcel tax in Union Elementary School Distr...", "summary_text": "This measure replaces an expiring parcel tax in Union Elementary School District with a new $148 annual tax per parcel for seven years to fund teacher retention, class size management, and academic programs. The tax would generate approximately $2 million annually for the district with exemptions for seniors and independent oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.580489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.059745", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1996, "fingerprint": "2024|202400752|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400752|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a86ae16d79403fc3", "measure_id": "202400752", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support quality local schools/ student achievement by maintaining strong reading, writing, science, technology, engineering, math, and arts programs; keeping schools clean, safe, and well-maintained; and attracting/ retaining quality teachers, shall Franklin\u00ad-McKinley School District's measure be adopted renewing expiring education parcel tax funding at $192 per parcel, with annual adjustments, raising approximately $3,300,000 annually for 9 years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight/ audits, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19283, "no_votes": 5622, "total_votes": 24905, "percent_yes": 77.42621963461153, "percent_no": 22.573780365388473, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an expiring education parcel tax in the Franklin-McKinley...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an expiring education parcel tax in the Franklin-McKinley School District at $192 per parcel with annual adjustments, generating approximately $3.3 million annually for 9 years to fund academic programs, school maintenance, and teacher retention. The measure includes exemptions for seniors and requires independent oversight and audits of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.575736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.056387", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1995, "fingerprint": "2024|202400751|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400751|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "fc5ca783cb7970fa", "measure_id": "202400751", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With no increase in current tax rates, shall the Evergreen Elementary School District measure to improve Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics (STEAM) programs and attract and retain highly qualified teachers, counselors and staff by providing competitive wages be adopted by renewing the annual parcel tax at $125 per parcel for seven years (raising approximately $3.3 million per year) with annual audits, independent citizen oversight, senior citizen exemptions and no money taken by the state and spent elsewhere?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28008, "no_votes": 12266, "total_votes": 40274, "percent_yes": 69.54362616079854, "percent_no": 30.45637383920146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an existing annual parcel tax of $125 per parcel for seve...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an existing annual parcel tax of $125 per parcel for seven years in the Evergreen Elementary School District to fund STEAM programs and provide competitive wages for teachers, counselors, and staff. The measure includes provisions for annual audits, citizen oversight, senior citizen exemptions, and would raise approximately $3.3 million per year.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.575429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.056139", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2009, "fingerprint": "2024|202400765|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400765|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "19c41076ae627046", "measure_id": "202400765", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renew annual funding for local elementary and middle schools without raising tax rates, support academic programs including math, English, science and technology; attract and retain quality teachers; and keep class sizes small, shall Sunnyvale School District's measure be adopted extending its existing $59 per parcel tax providing $1 million annually for eight years, with senior exemptions and all expenditures audited and reviewed by a community oversight committee with no funds for administrators and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23566, "no_votes": 5110, "total_votes": 28676, "percent_yes": 82.1802203933603, "percent_no": 17.8197796066397, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an existing $59 annual parcel tax for the Sunnyvale Schoo...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an existing $59 annual parcel tax for the Sunnyvale School District for eight years, generating approximately $1 million annually to fund academic programs, teacher retention, and maintain smaller class sizes. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and requires community oversight of expenditures, with funds restricted from administrator compensation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.580129", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.059517", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1993, "fingerprint": "2024|202400749|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400749|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a7cbf5bf8b78be83", "measure_id": "202400749", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds the State cannot take and no projected increase in current tax rates, shall Cupertino Union School District's measure to replace leaky roofs/ plumbing and expand CUSD's Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math classrooms in Cupertino, Los Altos, San Jose, Santa Clara, Saratoga and Sunnyvale be adopted, authorizing $347 million of bonds with average levies below $21 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (generating $23,300,000 annually) while outstanding, audits, legal rates, independent oversight, State matching funds eligibility, and full disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33626, "no_votes": 21438, "total_votes": 55064, "percent_yes": 61.067121894522735, "percent_no": 38.932878105477265, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Cupertino Union School District to issue $347 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Cupertino Union School District to issue $347 million in bonds to repair infrastructure like roofs and plumbing and expand STEM classrooms across schools in Cupertino, Los Altos, San Jose, Santa Clara, Saratoga, and Sunnyvale. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes with average levies below $21 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $23.3 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.574728", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.055664", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2024, "fingerprint": "2024|202400771|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400771|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ca3a6102c0e308d3", "measure_id": "202400771", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers, maintain strong core academic programs and high-quality science, technology, engineering, and math courses, support high student achievement and prepare students for top colleges and careers, shall Los Gatos-Saratoga Union High School District's measure be adopted, renewing its expiring education parcel tax at the current $49, plus $79/parcel, providing $2,520,000 annually for nine years, with annual adjustments, citizen oversight, senior exemptions, no funds for administrators, and every dollar benefiting local high schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 608, "no_votes": 466, "total_votes": 1074, "percent_yes": 56.61080074487895, "percent_no": 43.38919925512105, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-05-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.582038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.060560", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2025, "fingerprint": "2024|202400772|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400772|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "b326db2f28ce4dcb", "measure_id": "202400772", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District's measure to renovate/modernize classrooms; expand coding, measure to renovate/modernize classrooms; expand coding, robotics and engineering workshops; replace leaky roofs; and upgrade fire alarms and emergency communication systems at Aromas School, San Juan School, and Anzar High be adopted, authorizing $44 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $55 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $2.7 million annually while outstanding), citizens' oversight, and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36, "no_votes": 13, "total_votes": 49, "percent_yes": 73.46938775510205, "percent_no": 26.530612244897952, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue $44 million in bonds to renovate classrooms, expand STEM facilities, replace roofs, and upgrade safety systems at three schools. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging less than $55 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.582428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.060711", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2020, "fingerprint": "2024|202400767|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400767|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "92c03f022cc3861e", "measure_id": "202400767", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support academic excellence for Happy Valley students without increasing the current tax rate, maintain quality art and music programs, integrate modern technology into classrooms, retain high quality teachers and provide local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Happy Valley Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted renewing its existing parcel tax for eight years at the same rate of $99 per parcel raising approximately $61,000 annually with an exemption for seniors and with citizens\u2019 oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 571, "no_votes": 109, "total_votes": 680, "percent_yes": 83.97058823529412, "percent_no": 16.029411764705884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews Happy Valley Elementary School District's existing $99 an...", "summary_text": "This measure renews Happy Valley Elementary School District's existing $99 annual parcel tax for eight years at the current rate, generating approximately $61,000 annually for the district. The tax includes an exemption for seniors and requires citizens' oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.580784", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.059916", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2021, "fingerprint": "2024|202400768|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400768|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "52dc803b93ff81fe", "measure_id": "202400768", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; install ventilation and air conditioning systems, make health, safety and security improvements, and equip schools with 21st century learning technology, shall the Live Oak Elementary School District measure authorizing $44.0 million in bonds, at legal rates, be adopted levying an estimated $30 per $100,000 of assessed value generating on average $2.8 million annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens' oversight, annual audits and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4477, "no_votes": 2450, "total_votes": 6927, "percent_yes": 64.6311534574852, "percent_no": 35.3688465425148, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Live Oak Elementary School District to issue $44 m...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Live Oak Elementary School District to issue $44 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, construct facilities, install ventilation and air conditioning, make safety improvements, and purchase technology. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.581109", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.060086", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2026, "fingerprint": "2024|202400774|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400774|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "41f7ead7469123a5", "measure_id": "202400774", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure HH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prevent Lakeside School from closure, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, protect core academic programs in reading, writing and math, and support innovative science, technology and engineering programs, shall Lakeside Joint School District's measure be adopted, renewing expiring local funding without increasing the current $647 rate, providing $500,000 annually for 8 years that cannot be taken by the State, with senior exemptions, annual adjustments, citizens' oversight, no funds for administrators and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 501, "no_votes": 208, "total_votes": 709, "percent_yes": 70.66290550070522, "percent_no": 29.33709449929478, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews expiring local property tax funding for Lakeside Joint Sc...", "summary_text": "This measure renews expiring local property tax funding for Lakeside Joint School District at the current rate of $647, generating $500,000 annually for 8 years to fund academic programs and prevent school closure. The measure includes provisions for senior exemptions, citizen oversight, and restricts funds from being used for administrator salaries or taken by the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.583010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.061018", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure HH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2022, "fingerprint": "2024|202400769|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400769|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "df4cbb21e149c934", "measure_id": "202400769", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve quality of education; modernize and upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall the Pacific Elementary School District measure authorizing $1,300,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating on average $93,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a projected rate of approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 136, "no_votes": 86, "total_votes": 222, "percent_yes": 61.261261261261254, "percent_no": 38.738738738738746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Pacific Elementary School District to issue $1", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Pacific Elementary School District to issue $1.3 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, and replace temporary portable buildings with permanent classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.581443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.060237", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2023, "fingerprint": "2024|202400770|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400770|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "5a56b321ec8f3b81", "measure_id": "202400770", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize and upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; update playgrounds and playfields; and replace aging school facilities; shall the Pacific Elementary School District measure authorizing $675,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating on average $50,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a projected rate of approximately $18 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 151, "no_votes": 72, "total_votes": 223, "percent_yes": 67.71300448430493, "percent_no": 32.28699551569507, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Pacific Elementary School District to issue $675,...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Pacific Elementary School District to issue $675,000 in bonds to repair roofs, modernize classrooms and facilities, update playgrounds, and replace aging school infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $18 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating an average of $50,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.581730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.060398", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2011, "fingerprint": "2024|202400093|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400093|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "8e37f709c5f98d87", "measure_id": "202400093", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund essential Santa Cruz County services, including wildfire response/prevention/recovery; affordable housing to support working families and frontline workers including nurses, emergency responders, and educators; mental health crisis programs for children/vulnerable populations; substance abuse programs; improved public safety, road maintenance/pothole repair, parks/recreation; and programs to reduce homelessness, shall Santa Cruz County\u2019s transaction and use tax (sales tax) be increased in unincorporated areas by one-half cent, providing approximately $10,000,000 annually, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41640, "no_votes": 34609, "total_votes": 76249, "percent_yes": 54.61055226953796, "percent_no": 45.38944773046204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure increased the sales tax by 0", "summary_text": "This ballot measure increased the sales tax by 0.5% in unincorporated areas of Santa Cruz County to generate approximately $10 million annually for various county services including wildfire response, affordable housing, mental health programs, public safety, road maintenance, and homelessness reduction. The tax increase will remain in effect until voters decide to end it in a future election.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.343538", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.950184", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11026, "fingerprint": "2024|202400773|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400773|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "165975d3ebad0af6", "measure_id": "202400773", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize outdated classrooms/restrooms/school facilities to improve the quality of education; make security improvements; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; acquire, construct, improve sites/facilities/equipment, shall Bonny Doon Union Elementary School District's measure to issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $456,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, be adopted, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries, all money staying local ?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1179, "no_votes": 568, "total_votes": 1747, "percent_yes": 67.48712077847739, "percent_no": 32.51287922152261, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Bonny Doon Union Elementary School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Bonny Doon Union Elementary School District to issue $7 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, make security improvements, and replace deteriorating infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $456,000 annually until paid off.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.176447", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.582703", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.060867", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2013, "fingerprint": "2024|202400416|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400416|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "c87bdf24588e5991", "measure_id": "202400416", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect and maintain essential services including homelessness response/prevention, emergency shelters, case management/connection to services; cleaning up/addressing the impacts of encampments; keeping pollution out of local rivers, creeks, and streams; supporting local food programs; preparing for wildfires; maintaining/repairing streets/potholes; and improving/maintaining neighborhood parks, beaches, and public safety, shall the City of Santa Cruz measure to enact a one- half of one percent sales tax be adopted, raising about $8,000,000 annually for general government use until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11302, "no_votes": 6993, "total_votes": 18295, "percent_yes": 61.776441650724244, "percent_no": 38.223558349275756, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.5% sales tax in Santa Cruz to raise approximately $8 million annually for general government services including homelessness programs, environmental protection, infrastructure maintenance, and public safety. The tax will remain in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.452146", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.001922", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11027, "fingerprint": "2024|202400776|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400776|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ae4bc02aa700f764", "measure_id": "202400776", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Pajaro Valley Unified School District's measure to renovate classrooms; expand career/technical education programs including robotics and coding; and replace outdated plumbing, leaking pipes and aging electrical wiring be adopted, authorizing $315 million of bonds with levies less than $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $18.3 million annually) while outstanding, legal rates, annual audits, independent oversight, eligibility for state matching funds and full public disclosure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21937, "no_votes": 16001, "total_votes": 37938, "percent_yes": 57.823290632083925, "percent_no": 42.176709367916075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Pajaro Valley Unified School District to issue $315 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Pajaro Valley Unified School District to issue $315 million in bonds to renovate classrooms, expand career and technical education programs, and replace outdated infrastructure including plumbing and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of less than $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $18.3 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.177050", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.583682", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.061321", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2014, "fingerprint": "2024|202400417|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400417|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "df65e7f42f79ef92", "measure_id": "202400417", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended (retroactively to June 1, 2023) to: (1) prohibit further amending the City\u2019s General Plan, or Zoning Code or associated maps, to increase allowable building heights or Floor Area Ratios (FARs) for all residential and non-residential development projects in all zoning districts without prior voter approval; and (2) require developments thirty or more housing units to provide at least 25% inclusionary housing units (at unspecified levels of affordability)?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7139, "no_votes": 10977, "total_votes": 18116, "percent_yes": 39.40715389710753, "percent_no": 60.59284610289247, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited the city from increasing building height l...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited the city from increasing building height limits or floor area ratios in any zoning district without voter approval, and required developments of 30 or more housing units to include at least 25% affordable housing units. The changes would have applied retroactively to June 1, 2023.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.452449", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.002076", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2027, "fingerprint": "2024|202400775|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400775|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "96f3993fc3f731b4", "measure_id": "202400775", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To design and construct rental housing units for Live Oak School District teachers and staff including amenities and facilities, acquire real property for housing and school use; and make school facility improvements; shall the Live Oak School District measure authorizing $45,000,000 in bonds be adopted, levying on average $30 per $100,000 assessed value, generating approximately $3,300,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizen oversight and no funds used for administrator salaries or pensions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5267, "no_votes": 5694, "total_votes": 10961, "percent_yes": 48.052185019615, "percent_no": 51.947814980385, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.583319", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.061171", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2028, "fingerprint": "2024|202400777|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400777|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "6606bbd5bbc11072", "measure_id": "202400777", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve education quality; repair leaky roofs; install energy-efficient HVAC; construct multi- purpose rooms and safer playgrounds at elementary schools; provide all-weather track and field at Scotts Valley High School; and make essential safety improvements; shall Scotts Valley Unified School District's measure be adopted issuing $85,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $5,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $49 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, money staying local and none for salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5947, "no_votes": 4815, "total_votes": 10762, "percent_yes": 55.25924549340271, "percent_no": 44.74075450659729, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Scotts Valley Unified School District to issue $8...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Scotts Valley Unified School District to issue $85 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, HVAC installation, multipurpose rooms, playground safety upgrades, and an all-weather track at the high school. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $49 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.583957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.061471", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2029, "fingerprint": "2024|202400778|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400778|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "83609afecf4685cd", "measure_id": "202400778", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Soquel Union Elementary School District's measure be adopted authorizing $73,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $4,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding from levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizen's oversight, NO money for administrative salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8358, "no_votes": 6491, "total_votes": 14849, "percent_yes": 56.286618627517, "percent_no": 43.713381372483, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Soquel Union Elementary School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Soquel Union Elementary School District to issue $73 million in bonds to repair roofs, make health and safety improvements, and modernize classrooms and school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $4 million annually until the bonds are paid off.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.584226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.061621", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2012, "fingerprint": "2024|202400094|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400094|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "d268163991547adf", "measure_id": "202400094", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall voters enact on ordinance to fund projects to protect drinking water sources, rivers, creeks, streams, groundwater resources, beaches, and parks, reduce catastrophic wildfire risks, and preserve native wildlife, habitats, working lands, and agriculture, by levying $87 per parcel per year, raising approximately $7.3 million annually, with citizens' oversight, annual reports, public spending disclosure, and all money distributed locally, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76797, "no_votes": 50866, "total_votes": 127663, "percent_yes": 60.15603581303902, "percent_no": 39.84396418696098, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Environment", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This Santa Cruz ballot measure enacts an $87 annual parcel tax to fund enviro...", "summary_text": "This Santa Cruz ballot measure enacts an $87 annual parcel tax to fund environmental protection projects including water source protection, wildfire risk reduction, and habitat preservation, raising approximately $7.3 million per year. The measure includes provisions for citizen oversight, annual reporting, and public spending disclosure, with funds distributed locally until voters choose to end the tax.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.344083", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.950349", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2018, "fingerprint": "2024|202400421|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400421|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "15e724cf7f9f18b0", "measure_id": "202400421", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the Charter of the City of Watsonville to modify the eligibility requirement for appointment to all Boards and Commissions created pursuant to the Watsonville Charter from registered voter to resident of the City of Watsonville be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7539, "no_votes": 5440, "total_votes": 12979, "percent_yes": 58.08613914785422, "percent_no": 41.91386085214578, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the Watsonville city charter to change the eligibility re...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the Watsonville city charter to change the eligibility requirement for appointment to city boards and commissions from being a registered voter to being a resident of the city. The change allows non-registered voters who live in Watsonville to serve on these appointed bodies.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.453755", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.002691", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2019, "fingerprint": "2024|202400422|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400422|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "4a2e75b80b500239", "measure_id": "202400422", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the Charter of Watsonville to clarify staff positions and references to City regulations, clarify requirements regarding ordinance publication and hiring attorneys, update qualifications and duties of City Manager, modify Council meeting requirements, allow the Council to set compensation for Planning Commissioners, make the Library Board a Commission, allow Councilmembers to receive employment benefits, adjust the Mayor's salary, and remove or revise provisions to be consistent with current law be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7705, "no_votes": 5402, "total_votes": 13107, "percent_yes": 58.78538185702297, "percent_no": 41.21461814297703, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment updates various administrative provisions in Watsonvil...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment updates various administrative provisions in Watsonville's city charter, including clarifying staff positions and regulations, modifying city manager qualifications and duties, adjusting council meeting requirements and compensation structures, and revising provisions to align with current law. The measure also allows councilmembers to receive employment benefits, converts the Library Board to a Commission, and permits the council to set Planning Commissioner compensation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.454413", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.002842", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2017, "fingerprint": "2024|202400420|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400420|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "342daa44d1e2b75f", "measure_id": "202400420", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain city services, such as repairing pothole/streets; wildfire prevention programs, maintaining parks/playfields; and other critical governmental services, shall a measure modernizing Scotts Valley's 1992 business license ordinance be adopted, until ended by voters, raising the base rate from $90 to $150 per business and with rates increasing incrementally for larger businesses based on gross receipts as provided in the ordinance, generating approximately $1,100,000 annually, and all funds controlled locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4962, "no_votes": 1917, "total_votes": 6879, "percent_yes": 72.13257740950719, "percent_no": 27.867422590492808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure modernizes Scotts Valley's 1992 business license ordinance by in...", "summary_text": "This measure modernizes Scotts Valley's 1992 business license ordinance by increasing the base business license fee from $90 to $150 and implementing incremental rate increases for larger businesses based on gross receipts. The measure is expected to generate approximately $1,100,000 annually for city services including street repairs, wildfire prevention, and park maintenance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.453441", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.002541", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2015, "fingerprint": "2024|202400418|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400418|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "2caf08448ec9b20b", "measure_id": "202400418", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect essential city services including public safety and emergency services; repair potholes, maintain streets, sidewalks, bike lanes, beaches, the new wharf, and recreation programs for youth; improve traffic safety; and support local businesses, shall City-of-Capitola replace its quarter-percent sales tax, approved by voters in 2016, with a one- half percent sales tax, generating an estimated $2.2 million annually for general government use, for ten years, with independent audits, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3535, "no_votes": 1704, "total_votes": 5239, "percent_yes": 67.47470891391487, "percent_no": 32.52529108608513, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would replace Capitola's existing 0", "summary_text": "This measure would replace Capitola's existing 0.25% sales tax with a 0.5% sales tax for ten years, generating an estimated $2.2 million annually for general city services. The increased revenue would fund various municipal services including public safety, street maintenance, recreation programs, and other general government operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.452777", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.002240", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2016, "fingerprint": "2024|202400419|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400419|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "cf1068f128f8f37e", "measure_id": "202400419", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To sustain vital City services such as improving/ maintaining neighborhood parks/beaches/open space, providing safe routes to schools, expanding community recreational/youth/ senior programs, addressing crime/ public safety, improving bike/pedestrian safety, and help fight diabetes, heart disease, and childhood obesity, shall City of Santa Cruz's measure levying a two- cents per ounce tax for general governmental use on the wholesale distribution of sugar-sweetened beverages (e.g., sodas, energy drinks); generating $1,300,000 annually, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15780, "no_votes": 14364, "total_votes": 30144, "percent_yes": 52.34872611464968, "percent_no": 47.65127388535032, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies a two-cents per ounce tax on the wholesale distribution o...", "summary_text": "This measure levies a two-cents per ounce tax on the wholesale distribution of sugar-sweetened beverages like sodas and energy drinks in Santa Cruz. The tax is expected to generate $1.3 million annually for general city services including parks maintenance, recreational programs, public safety, and infrastructure improvements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.453151", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.002390", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2030, "fingerprint": "2024|202400095|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400095|SHASTA", "content_hash": "b7e75747872cb25c", "measure_id": "202400095", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Measure C (Shasta County Board of Supervisors Term Limits) be adopted? This measure imposes a limit of two terms for persons serving on the Shasta County Board of Supervisors. This term limit shall apply prospectively to terms of office commencing after January 1, 2025.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41170, "no_votes": 12377, "total_votes": 53547, "percent_yes": 76.88572655797711, "percent_no": 23.114273442022892, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposes a two-term limit on Shasta County Board of Supervisors m...", "summary_text": "This measure imposes a two-term limit on Shasta County Board of Supervisors members, applying to terms beginning after January 1, 2025.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.347241", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.950501", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2031, "fingerprint": "2024|202400096|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400096|SHASTA", "content_hash": "8dc73a5cf44de28b", "measure_id": "202400096", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Measure D (Establishing Shasta County as a California Charter County) be adopted? This measure establishes Shasta County as a California Charter County. The proposed Charter would allow for Members of the Board of Supervisors to appoint or call for a special election to fill vacancy on the Board of Supervisors.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29618, "no_votes": 23556, "total_votes": 53174, "percent_yes": 55.700154210704476, "percent_no": 44.299845789295524, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established Shasta County as a California Charter County, which ...", "summary_text": "This measure established Shasta County as a California Charter County, which gives the county greater local governance authority. The charter specifically allows the Board of Supervisors to either appoint someone or call a special election to fill vacancies on the board.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.347594", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.950650", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2038, "fingerprint": "2024|202400782|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400782|SHASTA", "content_hash": "6cb8119c8e8f0e20", "measure_id": "202400782", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of schools; replace leaky roofs; modernize/construct/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace HVAC and plumbing systems; make health, safety and security improvements; and upgrade inadequate electrical and communication systems; shall Cottonwood Union School District's measure be adopted authorizing $9,600,000 of bonds, at legal rates, generating on average $604,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, at rates of approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2635, "no_votes": 1590, "total_votes": 4225, "percent_yes": 62.366863905325445, "percent_no": 37.633136094674555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Cottonwood Union School District to issue $9,600,...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Cottonwood Union School District to issue $9,600,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom renovations, HVAC and plumbing system replacements, and health and safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.585651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.062257", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2035, "fingerprint": "2024|202400779|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400779|SHASTA", "content_hash": "fab3a412bd753004", "measure_id": "202400779", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Bella Vista Elementary School; repair/replace leaky roofs; renovate plumbing, sewer, electrical, and HVAC systems; improve safety/security; upgrade and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and facilities; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall Bella Vista Elementary School District's measure authorizing $4,400,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating on average $273,230 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $29.12 per $100,000 assessed value, annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1140, "no_votes": 837, "total_votes": 1977, "percent_yes": 57.66312594840668, "percent_no": 42.33687405159332, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Bella Vista Elementary School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Bella Vista Elementary School District to issue $4,400,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, infrastructure upgrades, classroom modernization, and replacement of temporary buildings with permanent classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $29.12 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.584519", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.061783", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2040, "fingerprint": "2024|202400784|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400784|SHASTA", "content_hash": "2905818b29f2ee72", "measure_id": "202400784", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Junction Elementary School and Junction Middle School; replace old temporary portables with permanent classrooms; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; modernize/renovate/upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Junction Elementary School District's measure to issue $6,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $339,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $23.30 per $100,000 assessed value, with citizens oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1198, "no_votes": 1138, "total_votes": 2336, "percent_yes": 51.284246575342465, "percent_no": 48.715753424657535, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Junction Elementary School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Junction Elementary School District to issue $6.1 million in bonds to replace temporary portable classrooms with permanent ones, upgrade electrical systems, modernize classrooms and restrooms, and make health, safety and accessibility improvements at Junction Elementary and Middle Schools. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $23.30 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.586304", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.062561", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2036, "fingerprint": "2024|202400780|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400780|SHASTA", "content_hash": "28251a612364455c", "measure_id": "202400780", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace/upgrade plumbing, sewer, and electrical systems; make health, safety, and handicapped accessibility improvements; replace portables; shall Cascade Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $16,500,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $945,100 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $28.54 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3530, "no_votes": 2498, "total_votes": 6028, "percent_yes": 58.56005308560053, "percent_no": 41.43994691439947, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Cascade Union Elementary School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Cascade Union Elementary School District to issue $16,500,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and restroom renovations, infrastructure upgrades, safety improvements, and portable classroom replacements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $28.54 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.585071", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.061935", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2039, "fingerprint": "2024|202400783|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400783|SHASTA", "content_hash": "6cffcc108f52d647", "measure_id": "202400783", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of schools; expand and renovate career technical education classrooms and labs; repair/replace leaky roofs; construct/upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace HVAC systems, shall Gateway Unified School District's measure authorizing $65,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, and levying approximately $49 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $3,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7392, "no_votes": 6019, "total_votes": 13411, "percent_yes": 55.11893221981955, "percent_no": 44.88106778018045, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Gateway Unified School District to issue $65 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Gateway Unified School District to issue $65 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including renovating career technical education spaces, repairing roofs, upgrading classrooms and restrooms, and replacing HVAC systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $49 per $100,000 of assessed property value, raising about $3.7 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.585997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.062408", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2037, "fingerprint": "2024|202400781|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400781|SHASTA", "content_hash": "6b1e46d06dfa7810", "measure_id": "202400781", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Columbia Elementary and Mountain View Middle School; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems, and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Columbia Elementary School District's measure to issue $12,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $716,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $30 per $100,000 in assessed value, with citizens oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2559, "no_votes": 2327, "total_votes": 4886, "percent_yes": 52.374130167826436, "percent_no": 47.625869832173564, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized Columbia Elementary School District to issu...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized Columbia Elementary School District to issue $12.9 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, electrical and plumbing system upgrades, and health and safety improvements at Columbia Elementary and Mountain View Middle School. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.585353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.062107", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2043, "fingerprint": "2024|202400787|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400787|SHASTA", "content_hash": "c65adea66118171a", "measure_id": "202400787", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade local schools with classrooms/ facilities preparing students for future jobs and apprenticeships; replace leaky roofs, plumbing, electrical; improve campus safety and supervision/ wellness of students; acquire/ construct/ modernize facilities, shall Red Bluff Joint Union High School District's measure authorizing $33.6 million of bonds at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value (averaging $2.5 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75, "no_votes": 81, "total_votes": 156, "percent_yes": 48.07692307692308, "percent_no": 51.92307692307692, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Red Bluff Joint Union High School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Red Bluff Joint Union High School District to issue $33.6 million in bonds to upgrade school facilities, including classroom improvements, infrastructure repairs, and safety enhancements. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $2.5 million annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.587199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.063026", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2044, "fingerprint": "2024|202400788|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400788|SHASTA", "content_hash": "4218c38d7c3bdc22", "measure_id": "202400788", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education at local high schools; replace leaky roofs; construct, upgrade, and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and career technical labs; upgrade electrical, plumbing, HVAC systems; make safety/security improvements; shall Shasta Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $56,600,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating average $4,100,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, at average rates of $14.39 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28207, "no_votes": 19233, "total_votes": 47440, "percent_yes": 59.458263069139974, "percent_no": 40.541736930860026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Shasta Union High School District to issue $56,60...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Shasta Union High School District to issue $56,600,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom and lab construction/modernization, infrastructure upgrades, and safety enhancements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of $14.39 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $4,100,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.587482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.063189", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2041, "fingerprint": "2024|202400785|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400785|SHASTA", "content_hash": "5885b08980da2d9e", "measure_id": "202400785", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair/ replace leaky roofs; construct/ modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make safety and security improvements; shall Pacheco Union School District's measure be adopted issuing $14,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating approximately $843,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at average rates of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2599, "no_votes": 2481, "total_votes": 5080, "percent_yes": 51.161417322834644, "percent_no": 48.838582677165356, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Pacheco Union School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Pacheco Union School District to issue $14.5 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including roofs, classrooms, and restrooms, while making safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an average rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $843,000 annually until paid off.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.586646", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.062714", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2042, "fingerprint": "2024|202400786|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400786|SHASTA", "content_hash": "a734dc60578b1d18", "measure_id": "202400786", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To reduce student overcrowding and address health and safety issues by building a new pre-kindergarten to eighth grade school, shall the Pacheco Union School District's measure be adopted issuing $14,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating approximately $860,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at average rates of 3 cents per $100_assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2418, "no_votes": 2607, "total_votes": 5025, "percent_yes": 48.11940298507463, "percent_no": 51.88059701492537, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Pacheco Union School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Pacheco Union School District to issue $14.7 million in bonds to build a new pre-kindergarten through eighth grade school to address overcrowding and safety issues. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $860,000 annually until paid off.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.586919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.062871", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2033, "fingerprint": "2024|202400098|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400098|SHASTA", "content_hash": "185be8e9445494cc", "measure_id": "202400098", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Measure P (Adding to the Shasta County Charter) be adopted? This measure adds a subsection to the Shasta County Charter. The proposed addition would limit the County\u2019s exercise of eminent domain.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39971, "no_votes": 40329, "total_votes": 80300, "percent_yes": 49.777085927770855, "percent_no": 50.222914072229145, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.348146", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.950956", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2034, "fingerprint": "2024|202400099|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400099|SHASTA", "content_hash": "9be9a297ffcd4c1f", "measure_id": "202400099", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Measure Q (Adding to the Shasta County Charter) be adopted? This measure adds a subsection to the Shasta County Charter. The proposed addition would allow for Members of the Board of Supervisors to appoint or call for a special election to fill an unplanned mid-term vacancy of designated elected department heads.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33285, "no_votes": 46962, "total_votes": 80247, "percent_yes": 41.47818610041497, "percent_no": 58.52181389958503, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.348415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.951126", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2032, "fingerprint": "2024|202400097|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400097|SHASTA", "content_hash": "a77706daf4cd1364", "measure_id": "202400097", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure R1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Kevin Crye be recalled (removed) from the Office of Shasta County Supervisor for District 1?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4666, "no_votes": 4716, "total_votes": 9382, "percent_yes": 49.73353229588574, "percent_no": 50.26646770411426, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.347869", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.950805", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure R1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2046, "fingerprint": "2024|202400423|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400423|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "c3a3df402814b0d3", "measure_id": "202400423", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SISKIYOU Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding (all funds used locally) for infrastructure and general City services, including, but not limited to, fire protection, law enforcement, rescue, emergency response and preparedness, and maintaining facilities and equipment, shall the City increase the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) rate from 10% to 12% on July 1, 2025, with an estimated increase of $60,000.00 generated annually from the resulting tax and will remain in effect until repealed or amended?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 504, "no_votes": 190, "total_votes": 694, "percent_yes": 72.62247838616715, "percent_no": 27.377521613832855, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Siskiyou's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 10...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Siskiyou's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 10% to 12% effective July 1, 2025, to fund local infrastructure and general city services including fire protection, law enforcement, and emergency services. The tax increase is estimated to generate an additional $60,000 annually and will remain in effect until repealed or amended by the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.454825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.002992", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SISKIYOU Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2047, "fingerprint": "2024|202400424|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400424|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "82685565afd7cb0e", "measure_id": "202400424", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SISKIYOU Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the City of Mount Shasta to collect a sales tax (Transaction and Use Tax) of 1% to be used for Police and Fire Protection and to remain in effect until repealed or amended by the electorate and which will raise approximately $1,600,000 annually?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 860, "no_votes": 884, "total_votes": 1744, "percent_yes": 49.31192660550459, "percent_no": 50.68807339449541, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.455247", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.003145", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SISKIYOU Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2048, "fingerprint": "2024|202400425|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400425|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "25266c2c228f734e", "measure_id": "202400425", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SISKIYOU Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and improve essential city services, including local firefighting and emergency medical response; hire and train firefighters; upgrade/replace aging firefighting safety equipment, life-saving tools and an outdated fire station, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a one percent sales tax providing approximately 2.4 million dollars annually for general government use, until ended by the voters, with independent audits and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1655, "no_votes": 1458, "total_votes": 3113, "percent_yes": 53.16415033729521, "percent_no": 46.83584966270479, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure imposes a 1% sales tax in Siskiyou to generate approximately $2", "summary_text": "The measure imposes a 1% sales tax in Siskiyou to generate approximately $2.4 million annually for general government use, with stated priorities including firefighting, emergency medical response, equipment upgrades, and fire station improvements. The tax continues indefinitely until ended by voters and requires independent audits with all funds remaining local.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.455529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.003293", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SISKIYOU Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2045, "fingerprint": "2024|202400100|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400100|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "152f8a93bc11a4a6", "measure_id": "202400100", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SISKIYOU Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the current voter elected position of County Auditor-Controller become a Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors' appointed position of Auditor-Controller with an effective date of January 4, 2027?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6303, "no_votes": 12749, "total_votes": 19052, "percent_yes": 33.083140877598154, "percent_no": 66.91685912240185, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the Siskiyou County Auditor-Controller positi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the Siskiyou County Auditor-Controller position from an elected office to one appointed by the County Board of Supervisors, effective January 4, 2027.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.348721", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.951277", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SISKIYOU Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2050, "fingerprint": "2024|202400790|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400790|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "6162ef7860eef3c0", "measure_id": "202400790", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SISKIYOU Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To rebuild Weed Elementary School, provide modern facilities, improve health and safety, save dollars better spent in the classroom, and provide the local match for millions more from the State; shall the Weed Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $6,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value and raising an estimated average $450,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with oversight, annual audits, all funds staying local and NO money for administrators\u2019 salaries, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 799, "no_votes": 660, "total_votes": 1459, "percent_yes": 54.76353666895134, "percent_no": 45.23646333104866, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.588045", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.063520", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SISKIYOU Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2049, "fingerprint": "2024|202400789|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400789|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "f0d16c020f16cd46", "measure_id": "202400789", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SISKIYOU Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Siskiyou Union High School District\u2019s measure to replace leaky roofs; update classrooms for Career Technical Education programs; and renovate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEAM) facilities at Happy Camp High, McCloud High, Mount Shasta High and Weed High be adopted, authorizing $22 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $1.3 million annually) while outstanding, citizen oversight, and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5002, "no_votes": 2840, "total_votes": 7842, "percent_yes": 63.78474878857434, "percent_no": 36.21525121142566, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Siskiyou Union High School District to issue $22 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Siskiyou Union High School District to issue $22 million in bonds to replace roofs, update Career Technical Education classrooms, and renovate STEAM facilities at four high schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $1.3 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.587764", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.063355", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SISKIYOU Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2051, "fingerprint": "2024|202400426|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400426|SOLANO", "content_hash": "f70335b8c7de3fe0", "measure_id": "202400426", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Benicia enact a measure protecting essential Benicia services, including: maintaining police services, protecting 911 response times, maintaining local parks and library services, promoting economic development, by adopting an ordinance increasing the transient occupancy tax, paid by hotels and vacation rentals, from 9% to 13%, paid only by guests and tourists, providing approximately $250,000 annually for general governmental purposes, sunsetting in twelve years, subject to accountability by annual audits and an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7869, "no_votes": 2267, "total_votes": 10136, "percent_yes": 77.63417521704814, "percent_no": 22.36582478295186, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases Benicia's transient occupancy tax on hotels and vacatio...", "summary_text": "The measure increases Benicia's transient occupancy tax on hotels and vacation rentals from 9% to 13%, generating approximately $250,000 annually for general city services. The tax increase has a twelve-year sunset clause and includes provisions for annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.455853", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.003444", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2052, "fingerprint": "2024|202400427|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400427|SOLANO", "content_hash": "8a0a73cf56f6736f", "measure_id": "202400427", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect Benicia\u2019s essential public safety, city services, and facilities including: maintaining police services, protecting 911 and fire emergency response times, maintaining local parks, preserving recreation and library services, sustaining other vital city programs, shall the City of Benicia enact a measure, by adopting a \u00be cent sales tax, for general government purposes, providing approximately $5,400,000 annually, under local control, with citizens\u2019 oversight and annual audits, with a sunset date of twelve years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7335, "no_votes": 2829, "total_votes": 10164, "percent_yes": 72.16646989374263, "percent_no": 27.83353010625737, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacts a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacts a 0.75% sales tax in Benicia to fund general city services including police, fire, emergency response, parks, recreation, and library services, generating approximately $5.4 million annually for twelve years. The measure includes provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits of the tax revenue.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.456266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.003607", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2061, "fingerprint": "2024|202400791|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400791|SOLANO", "content_hash": "7a2372d9d615eb14", "measure_id": "202400791", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade, renovate, and modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; renovate/construct science and career technical classrooms/labs; and replace outdated HVAC systems; shall Benicia Unified School District's measure authorizing $122,500,000 of bonds be adopted at legal rates, generating on average $7,500,000 per year while bonds are outstanding, at approximately $60 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent oversight, NO money for salaries, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6316, "no_votes": 3796, "total_votes": 10112, "percent_yes": 62.46044303797469, "percent_no": 37.53955696202531, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Benicia Unified School District to issue $122", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Benicia Unified School District to issue $122.5 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom upgrades, roof repairs, science lab construction, and HVAC system replacements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating an average of $7.5 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.588356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.063688", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2064, "fingerprint": "2024|202400794|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400794|SOLANO", "content_hash": "856a6a09356c0200", "measure_id": "202400794", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education/ student safety; construct/ renovate science, technology, engineering, math and career technical education classrooms/ labs; modernize classrooms; and construct a new school; shall Vacaville Unified School District\u2019s measure be approved authorizing $317,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $17,425,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $48.00 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for teacher salaries and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18936, "no_votes": 19034, "total_votes": 37970, "percent_yes": 49.87095075059258, "percent_no": 50.12904924940742, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Vacaville Unified School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Vacaville Unified School District to issue $317 million in bonds to construct and renovate STEM and career technical education facilities, modernize classrooms, and build a new school. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $48 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.589255", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.064162", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2053, "fingerprint": "2024|202400428|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400428|SOLANO", "content_hash": "62920e1a7d030218", "measure_id": "202400428", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the citizens of Benicia enact a measure raising local funds for the specific purpose of repairing, maintaining, and improving Benicia\u2019s streets, roads, potholes and related sidewalks and storm drains, never to be used for other municipal services, by adopting a \u00bd cent sales tax, providing approximately $4,000,000 annually, with a citizen oversight committee and annual audits, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9616, "no_votes": 6175, "total_votes": 15791, "percent_yes": 60.89544677347857, "percent_no": 39.10455322652143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacts a half-cent sales tax in Benicia to generate approximatel...", "summary_text": "This measure enacts a half-cent sales tax in Benicia to generate approximately $4 million annually for repairing, maintaining, and improving local streets, roads, potholes, sidewalks, and storm drains. The funds are restricted to these transportation infrastructure purposes only and include citizen oversight and annual audits, continuing until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.456584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.003769", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2054, "fingerprint": "2024|202400429|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400429|SOLANO", "content_hash": "87f1dd793de12e8c", "measure_id": "202400429", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To ensure proper investments in essential City services including roads, infrastructure, Benicia\u2019s Police and Fire Departments, shall the City of Benicia adopt a Charter, that can only be amended with voter approval, for the limited and sole purpose of allowing voters to consider enacting a real property transfer tax (measure H), the proceeds of which shall provide necessary funding for critical City infrastructure and services, monitored with audits and citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7193, "no_votes": 8321, "total_votes": 15514, "percent_yes": 46.36457393322161, "percent_no": 53.63542606677839, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Revenues: Voter Approval Requirement", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have adopted a city charter for Benicia that could only be...", "summary_text": "This measure would have adopted a city charter for Benicia that could only be amended with voter approval, with the specific purpose of enabling voters to consider enacting a real property transfer tax. The charter was designed to allow implementation of a separate ballot measure (Measure H) that would establish the transfer tax to fund city infrastructure and services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.456870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.003937", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2055, "fingerprint": "2024|202400430|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400430|SOLANO", "content_hash": "781a07e04fe81661", "measure_id": "202400430", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To invest in essential city services including: Roads, infrastructure, facilities; Police, Fire, City services; Shall the City of Benicia enact a real property transfer tax based on sale price, assessed only when property is sold, with exemptions for family members, at a rate of 0.4% for properties $2 million and under, 0.6% for properties over $2 million, and 0.8% for properties over $10 million, providing approximately $850,000 annually, until ended by voters, with audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6395, "no_votes": 9153, "total_votes": 15548, "percent_yes": 41.13069205042449, "percent_no": 58.86930794957551, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a real property transfer tax in Benicia wi...", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a real property transfer tax in Benicia with rates of 0.4% for properties $2 million and under, 0.6% for properties over $2 million, and 0.8% for properties over $10 million, with exemptions for family transfers. The tax would have generated approximately $850,000 annually to fund city services including roads, infrastructure, police, and fire services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.457174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.004101", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2056, "fingerprint": "2024|202400431|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400431|SOLANO", "content_hash": "c510f175f2d1ba80", "measure_id": "202400431", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure maintaining local control of the City of Dixon's financial stability and essential services including 911 emergency response times, fire/paramedic protection; retaining/attracting firefighters/paramedics/police; preventing crime; providing safe routes to school; keeping public spaces safe/clean; attracting/retaining local businesses; repairing streets/potholes; by establishing a 1 \u00a2 sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $3,000,000 annually, requiring public spending disclosures/all funds used in Dixon, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5144, "no_votes": 4087, "total_votes": 9231, "percent_yes": 55.725273534828304, "percent_no": 44.274726465171696, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Dixon, California to generate ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Dixon, California to generate approximately $3 million annually for general city services including emergency response, public safety, street repairs, and other municipal operations. The tax would remain in effect until repealed by voters and requires public disclosure of spending.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.457478", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.004262", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2059, "fingerprint": "2024|202400434|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400434|SOLANO", "content_hash": "c2128144e9c07bd3", "measure_id": "202400434", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to address the City of Rio Vista's budget deficit, maintain the City's infrastructure, and increase funding for city services such as roads, fire, police, parks, recreation, and other unrestricted general fund expenditures, by enacting a one percent transactions and use tax for a period of five (5) years commencing on April 1, 2025, that is projected to provide approximately $1,729,000 million dollars annually, with all funds locally controlled and subject to local citizen oversight, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4060, "no_votes": 2376, "total_votes": 6436, "percent_yes": 63.08266003729024, "percent_no": 36.91733996270976, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacts a 1% sales tax in Rio Vista for five years starting April...", "summary_text": "This measure enacts a 1% sales tax in Rio Vista for five years starting April 1, 2025, projected to generate approximately $1.73 million annually for general city services including roads, fire, police, parks, and infrastructure maintenance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.458343", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.004730", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2057, "fingerprint": "2024|202400432|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400432|SOLANO", "content_hash": "33fe5837eff3f21b", "measure_id": "202400432", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect essential city services such as pothole/street repair; fire protection/9-1-1 response; neighborhood police patrols; city park maintenance; senior and youth programs; and for general government use, shall the measure be adopted modernizing and simplifying Fairfield\u2019s business license ordinance, with rates of $55 and up, and other rates as specified in the ordinance, until ended by voters, providing approximately $1,000,000 annually, including independent audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30304, "no_votes": 12227, "total_votes": 42531, "percent_yes": 71.25155768733394, "percent_no": 28.748442312666057, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure modernizes and simplifies Fairfield's business license ordinance...", "summary_text": "This measure modernizes and simplifies Fairfield's business license ordinance with rates starting at $55, generating approximately $1,000,000 annually for city services including street repair, fire protection, police patrols, park maintenance, and senior and youth programs. The tax continues until ended by voters and includes requirements for independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.457754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.004420", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2058, "fingerprint": "2024|202400433|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400433|SOLANO", "content_hash": "d58040f0ebfaa4ba", "measure_id": "202400433", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect essential city services such as pothole/street repair; fire protection/9-1-1 response; neighborhood police patrols; city park maintenance; senior and youth programs; and for general government use, shall the ordinance be adopted updating Fairfield's existing transient occupancy (hotel) tax, paid only by hotel/ lodging guests, from 10% to 12%, until ended by voters, providing approximately $600,000 annually, that cannot be taken by the State, including annual independent audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29312, "no_votes": 13406, "total_votes": 42718, "percent_yes": 68.61744463692119, "percent_no": 31.382555363078808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Fairfield's transient occupancy tax on hotel and lodgi...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Fairfield's transient occupancy tax on hotel and lodging guests from 10% to 12%, generating approximately $600,000 annually for city services including street repair, fire protection, police patrols, parks, and senior/youth programs. The tax increase requires annual independent audits and will remain in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.458049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.004579", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2062, "fingerprint": "2024|202400792|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400792|SOLANO", "content_hash": "0cabb299d0aa4f73", "measure_id": "202400792", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue outstanding academics in science, technology, engineering, math, reading, writing, arts/ music; attract and retain high quality teachers; support student mental health; safety; continue athletics, library services, and limit class sizes, shall Davis Joint Unified School District's measure be adopted, renewing the expiring education parcel tax at the current rate of $768/ year, raising approximately $11,700,000 annually until ended by Voters, with adjustments for Inflation; senior/ disability exemptions; and independent oversight; for the exclusive use of Davis schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5, "no_votes": 10, "total_votes": 15, "percent_yes": 33.33333333333333, "percent_no": 66.66666666666667, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have renewed Davis Joint Unified School District's existin...", "summary_text": "This measure would have renewed Davis Joint Unified School District's existing education parcel tax at $768 per year, raising approximately $11.7 million annually with inflation adjustments, senior and disability exemptions, and independent oversight. The funds would have supported academic programs, teacher retention, student services, athletics, libraries, and class size limits exclusively for Davis schools.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.588701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.063845", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2063, "fingerprint": "2024|202400793|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400793|SOLANO", "content_hash": "0118874528b46b2c", "measure_id": "202400793", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair aging schools, including replacing aging plumbing, electrical, lighting/ HVAC systems; repairing/ adding classrooms for science, technology, engineering, and math instruction; and improving campus security with fencing, cameras and lighting; shall the Travis Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $65,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, averaging $4,700,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, and all funds for Travis Unified School District schools only?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7204, "no_votes": 4661, "total_votes": 11865, "percent_yes": 60.716392751790984, "percent_no": 39.283607248209016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Travis Unified School District to issue $65 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Travis Unified School District to issue $65 million in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including repairs to plumbing, electrical, HVAC systems, science and math classrooms, and campus security upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $4.7 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.588979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.063997", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2060, "fingerprint": "2024|202400435|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400435|SOLANO", "content_hash": "4393a140c5a075b7", "measure_id": "202400435", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain Suisun City\u2019s financial stability and prevent cuts to city services, such as addressing crime/public nuisances associated with homelessness, preventing elimination of neighborhood police patrols, preventing cuts to 9-1-1 fire/ emergency medical response; and maintaining streets, shall the measure be adopted renewing the current 1% local sales tax at a 1.75% rate, providing approximately $6,766,000 annually for 15 years, requiring independent audits, oversight, all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7716, "no_votes": 2983, "total_votes": 10699, "percent_yes": 72.11888961585194, "percent_no": 27.88111038414806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Suisun City's local sales tax from 1% to 1", "summary_text": "This measure increased Suisun City's local sales tax from 1% to 1.75% for 15 years to fund general city services including police patrols, fire/emergency medical response, street maintenance, and addressing homelessness-related issues. The measure is expected to generate approximately $6.77 million annually with independent audits and local oversight required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.458617", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.004883", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2079, "fingerprint": "2024|202400795|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400795|SONOMA", "content_hash": "74a1a5d9583b2713", "measure_id": "202400795", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renew locally controlled funding without increasing tax rates to maintain reading, writing, math/science programs; attract/retain qualified teachers; keep school libraries open; and prepare students for college/careers, shall Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted renewing the existing $89 educational parcel tax at a fixed rate for eight years, raising $1,300,000 annually, with exemptions for seniors, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10320, "no_votes": 3436, "total_votes": 13756, "percent_yes": 75.02180866530969, "percent_no": 24.978191334690308, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an existing $89 annual parcel tax for the Cotati-Rohnert ...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an existing $89 annual parcel tax for the Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District for eight years, generating approximately $1,300,000 annually for educational programs including reading, writing, math, science, libraries, and teacher retention. The measure includes exemptions for seniors, prohibits using funds for administrator salaries, and establishes independent citizen oversight with all funds remaining within the local district.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.589546", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.064326", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2089, "fingerprint": "2024|202400805|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400805|SONOMA", "content_hash": "227de571e2e3e92d", "measure_id": "202400805", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ upgrade local high/ junior high school classrooms, science labs, technology/ job training facilities; improve fire/ earthquake safety/ campus security; remove hazardous materials like lead/ asbestos; repair leaky roofs, outdated portable classrooms, HVAC, electrical, plumbing; shall Petaluma Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $159,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, at $30 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($9,100,000 annually), with independent oversight, and no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25348, "no_votes": 14987, "total_votes": 40335, "percent_yes": 62.84368414528325, "percent_no": 37.15631585471675, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Petaluma Joint Union High School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Petaluma Joint Union High School District to issue $159 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, science labs, safety systems, and infrastructure like roofs, HVAC, and plumbing. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.593091", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.065961", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2083, "fingerprint": "2024|202400799|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400799|SONOMA", "content_hash": "74c6fbfa97dcd4b5", "measure_id": "202400799", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide locally controlled funding for local junior high/ high schools that cannot be taken away by the state to attract/retain excellent teachers; enhance math, science, engineering, technology, writing programs; maintain smaller class sizes; and prepare students for college/ careers, shall Petaluma Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted levying an $89 educational parcel tax, raising $2,200,000 annually, for 8 years, with exemptions for seniors, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and independent citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15795, "no_votes": 9082, "total_votes": 24877, "percent_yes": 63.492382522008285, "percent_no": 36.507617477991715, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an $89 annual parcel tax on properties within...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an $89 annual parcel tax on properties within the Petaluma Joint Union High School District for 8 years to raise $2.2 million annually for teacher retention, academic programs, smaller class sizes, and college/career preparation. The measure included exemptions for seniors, prohibited using funds for administrator salaries, and required independent citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.590970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.064987", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2086, "fingerprint": "2024|202400802|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400802|SONOMA", "content_hash": "1509fc17192020c0", "measure_id": "202400802", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ upgrade local schools without increasing projected tax rates by replacing leaky roofs, aging plumbing/ HVAC; removing hazardous materials including asbestos/ lead; upgrading science, technology, engineering, math classrooms/ labs; and replacing deteriorating portable classrooms; shall Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District's measure authorizing $91,500,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately $35 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($5,400,000 annually) with independent oversight, audits, no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17647, "no_votes": 7406, "total_votes": 25053, "percent_yes": 70.43867001955853, "percent_no": 29.56132998044147, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District to issue $91.5 million in bonds to repair and upgrade local schools, including roof and plumbing repairs, hazardous material removal, STEM classroom improvements, and portable classroom replacement. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $35 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.592064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.065479", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2080, "fingerprint": "2024|202400796|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400796|SONOMA", "content_hash": "d5cfe0484bf9706b", "measure_id": "202400796", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain classrooms and facilities; repair roofs and aging infrastructure; replace outdated HVAC systems; and improve safety, including reducing fire risk, updating fire alarms and providing ongoing power during emergencies; shall Fort Ross Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $2,100,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value and raising an estimated average $150,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens\u2019 oversight, audits, all funds staying local and no money for salaries, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 159, "no_votes": 127, "total_votes": 286, "percent_yes": 55.59440559440559, "percent_no": 44.40559440559441, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Fort Ross Elementary School District to issue $2,...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Fort Ross Elementary School District to issue $2,100,000 in bonds to fund facility maintenance, infrastructure repairs, HVAC system replacements, and safety improvements including fire risk reduction. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating an estimated $150,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.589912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.064490", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2069, "fingerprint": "2024|202400436|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400436|SONOMA", "content_hash": "6ac5f6950df0f21d", "measure_id": "202400436", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to extend the term of the City\u2019s Urban Growth Boundary by 20 years and modify the City\u2019s Urban Growth Boundary to include the western hillside adjacent to the City\u2019s existing boundary to facilitate City, rather than the County, control over development in this area to further the City\u2019s goal of preserving the hillside from significant new development?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2757, "no_votes": 1193, "total_votes": 3950, "percent_yes": 69.79746835443038, "percent_no": 30.20253164556962, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Growth Cap/Boundary", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure extends Sonoma's Urban Growth Boundary by 20 years and expands it...", "summary_text": "The measure extends Sonoma's Urban Growth Boundary by 20 years and expands it to include the western hillside area adjacent to the city's existing boundary. This change transfers development control of the hillside area from the county to the city, with the stated goal of preserving the hillside from significant new development.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.458896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.005045", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2081, "fingerprint": "2024|202400797|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400797|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f3ce7504eeae5df9", "measure_id": "202400797", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve facilities at Harmony and Salmon Creek Schools; repair/replace roofs; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make campus security, health, safety and accessibility improvements; shall Harmony Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $13,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $781,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, No money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1089, "no_votes": 836, "total_votes": 1925, "percent_yes": 56.57142857142857, "percent_no": 43.42857142857143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Harmony Union School District to issue $13", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Harmony Union School District to issue $13.5 million in bonds to fund facility improvements at Harmony and Salmon Creek Schools, including roof repairs, classroom modernization, and security upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.590307", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.064655", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2070, "fingerprint": "2024|202400437|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400437|SONOMA", "content_hash": "975e4caa9face316", "measure_id": "202400437", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure DD", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund street and sidewalk repair and maintenance, improve public safety infrastructure, enhance park facilities and open spaces, make health, safety, and security improvements, and for general government use, shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $1,600,000 annually in locally-controlled funding that cannot be taken by the state or county, with independent citizen oversight and required annual audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2274, "no_votes": 1714, "total_votes": 3988, "percent_yes": 57.02106318956871, "percent_no": 42.97893681043129, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a 0.75 cent sales tax in Sonoma, California to fund street and sidewalk maintenance, public safety infrastructure, park improvements, and general government services, generating approximately $1.6 million annually. The tax will remain in effect until voters choose to end it and includes provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.459196", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.005206", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure DD", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2082, "fingerprint": "2024|202400798|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400798|SONOMA", "content_hash": "da10632230473695", "measure_id": "202400798", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide locally controlled funding for local elementary schools that cannot be taken away by the state to attract/ retain excellent teachers; expand art and music programs; enhance math, science, engineering, technology, reading and writing programs; and maintain smaller class sizes, shall Petaluma City (Elementary) School District\u2019s measure be adopted levying an $89 educational parcel tax, raising $1,400,000 annually for 8 years, with exemptions for seniors, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and independent citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7622, "no_votes": 3511, "total_votes": 11133, "percent_yes": 68.46312763855205, "percent_no": 31.536872361447948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies an $89 annual parcel tax on properties within the Petalum...", "summary_text": "This measure levies an $89 annual parcel tax on properties within the Petaluma City Elementary School District for 8 years to raise $1.4 million annually for teacher retention, academic programs, arts and music programs, and smaller class sizes. The measure includes exemptions for seniors, prohibits using funds for administrator salaries, and requires independent citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.590613", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.064821", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2074, "fingerprint": "2024|202400441|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400441|SONOMA", "content_hash": "da137fafad95c6f4", "measure_id": "202400441", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure EE", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain locally controlled funding for services, such as repairing potholes/maintaining streets; maintaining youth violence prevention, drug/gang intervention programs; keeping city parks clean safe/well maintained; and improving wildfire prevention/preparedness, shall City of Santa Rosa\u2019s general business tax measure be adopted increasing the maximum tax, adjusting rates and taxing short-term rental businesses, as described in the voter pamphlet, providing $3,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, with all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50283, "no_votes": 27610, "total_votes": 77893, "percent_yes": 64.55393937837803, "percent_no": 35.44606062162197, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Santa Rosa's general business tax rates and extends ta...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Santa Rosa's general business tax rates and extends taxation to short-term rental businesses, generating approximately $3 million annually for city services including street maintenance, youth programs, parks, and wildfire prevention. The tax increase continues indefinitely until voters choose to end it, with all revenue remaining within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.460333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.005850", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure EE", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2075, "fingerprint": "2024|202400442|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400442|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0a3ae56327fe69d5", "measure_id": "202400442", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure FF", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain locally controlled funding for services, such as keeping city parks clean safe/well maintained, repairing potholes and maintaining streets, enhancing senior/youth programs, and for general government use, shall City of Santa Rosa\u2019s measure be adopted increasing the existing transient occupancy tax charged to hotel, motel and lodging guests by 2%, until ended by voters, providing $1,200,000 annually and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52589, "no_votes": 25207, "total_votes": 77796, "percent_yes": 67.59859118720757, "percent_no": 32.401408812792425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Santa Rosa's transient occupancy tax on hotel, motel, ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Santa Rosa's transient occupancy tax on hotel, motel, and lodging guests by 2% to generate approximately $1.2 million annually for city services including parks maintenance, street repairs, and senior/youth programs. The tax increase continues indefinitely until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.460640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.006069", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure FF", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2084, "fingerprint": "2024|202400800|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400800|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0feaa67c59fb1b56", "measure_id": "202400800", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update local elementary/middle schools by upgrading classrooms, science, technology, engineering labs/music classrooms and classroom technology; provide classrooms for kindergarten students and students with learning disabilities; replace outdated portable classrooms; repair, construct, acquire, classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment; shall Rincon Valley Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted, authorizing $65,600,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation raising approximately $4,400,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8668, "no_votes": 5909, "total_votes": 14577, "percent_yes": 59.46353845098443, "percent_no": 40.53646154901557, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Rincon Valley Union School District to issue $65", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Rincon Valley Union School District to issue $65.6 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, science and technology labs, music facilities, and classroom technology, as well as replace portable classrooms and provide specialized classrooms for kindergarten and students with learning disabilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $4.4 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.591372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.065148", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2065, "fingerprint": "2024|202400101|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400101|SONOMA", "content_hash": "742d80f1573ba8bb", "measure_id": "202400101", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve and enhance local fire prevention, protection, emergency paramedic services and disaster response throughout Sonoma County by: improving vegetation management to prevent wildfire spread; attracting and retaining qualified, local firefighters; improving response times; and updating firefighting facilities and equipment, shall Sonoma County establish a \u00bd cent sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $60,000,000 annually, with annual audits and citizen oversight, and increase its annual appropriations limit to allow expenditure of the proceeds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89646, "no_votes": 55615, "total_votes": 145261, "percent_yes": 61.71374284907856, "percent_no": 38.28625715092144, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a half-cent sales tax in Sonoma County to fund fire ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a half-cent sales tax in Sonoma County to fund fire prevention, emergency paramedic services, and disaster response, including vegetation management, firefighter recruitment and retention, improved response times, and updated facilities and equipment. The tax would generate approximately $60 million annually and continue until ended by voters, with annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.349054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.951425", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2066, "fingerprint": "2024|202400102|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400102|SONOMA", "content_hash": "fd69b55748b11ebc", "measure_id": "202400102", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the health and well-being of Sonoma County children, including: Increasing access to child care and early childhood education to start kindergarten ready; increasing access to vital children\u2019s preventive health care and mental health services; preventing child abuse/neglect; and prioritizing children impacted by homelessness and trauma, shall Sonoma County establish a \u00bc cent sales tax, providing $30,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, subject to independent audits and review by an oversight commission?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 149705, "no_votes": 88650, "total_votes": 238355, "percent_yes": 62.80757693356548, "percent_no": 37.19242306643452, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a quarter-cent sales tax in Sonoma County to generat...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a quarter-cent sales tax in Sonoma County to generate approximately $30 million annually for children's services including childcare, early education, healthcare, mental health services, and child abuse prevention. The tax continues indefinitely until voters choose to end it and includes independent audits and oversight commission review.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.349365", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.951586", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2067, "fingerprint": "2024|202400103|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400103|SONOMA", "content_hash": "7a0fefb3ec13e03d", "measure_id": "202400103", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Should the County Code be amended to prohibit, outside of the Coastal Zone, farms and other animal production operations that meet the definition of \u201cConcentrated Animal Feeding Operations\u201d (CAFOs), as defined by federal regulations, require phase out of existing CAFOs over three years, authorize daily financial penalties for violations, and require, among other things, the Agricultural Commissioner to create a job retraining program for CAFO workers?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36268, "no_votes": 205985, "total_votes": 242253, "percent_yes": 14.97112522858334, "percent_no": 85.02887477141667, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have prohibited Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAF...", "summary_text": "The measure would have prohibited Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) as defined by federal regulations outside Sonoma County's Coastal Zone, required existing CAFOs to phase out over three years, and established daily financial penalties for violations. It also would have mandated the Agricultural Commissioner to create a job retraining program for CAFO workers.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.349757", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.951753", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2090, "fingerprint": "2024|202400806|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400806|SONOMA", "content_hash": "105e5e03e2d868c7", "measure_id": "202400806", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; replace outdated heating and cooling systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and make health, safety and security improvements, shall Piner-Olivet Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $29,500,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $1,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4599, "no_votes": 3569, "total_votes": 8168, "percent_yes": 56.305093046033306, "percent_no": 43.694906953966694, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Piner-Olivet Union School District to issue $29", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Piner-Olivet Union School District to issue $29.5 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, repair facilities, and upgrade building systems including roofs, heating/cooling, and electrical infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating about $1.7 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.593430", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.066126", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2093, "fingerprint": "2024|202400809|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400809|SONOMA", "content_hash": "15a7a1af39134691", "measure_id": "202400809", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and enhance quality instruction in math, science, reading and writing; attract and retain highly qualified staff members; protect mental health counseling, health and nursing services; and reduce class sizes, shall the Waugh School District local school parcel tax measure be adopted, at the rate of $89 per year (raising approximately $545,000 annually), for four years, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, exempting those 65 years and older, and all funds spent only for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2355, "no_votes": 1399, "total_votes": 3754, "percent_yes": 62.73308470964305, "percent_no": 37.26691529035695, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed an $89 annual parcel tax on properties in the ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed an $89 annual parcel tax on properties in the Waugh School District for four years to raise approximately $545,000 annually for educational programs and services, with exemptions for property owners 65 and older. The tax revenue would have been designated for instruction, staff retention, student services, and class size reduction with independent oversight required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.594393", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.066611", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2091, "fingerprint": "2024|202400807|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400807|SONOMA", "content_hash": "59175723c00ab2f2", "measure_id": "202400807", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; replace outdated HVAC systems; make health, safety, security and energy-efficiency improvements; replace deteriorating portables with permanent classrooms; and improve playgrounds/playfields, shall the Roseland Elementary School District measure authorizing $12,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all funds locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2340, "no_votes": 1138, "total_votes": 3478, "percent_yes": 67.28004600345025, "percent_no": 32.71995399654975, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Roseland Elementary School District to issue $12 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Roseland Elementary School District to issue $12 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom modernization, roof repairs, HVAC system replacements, and playground upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value, raising about $700,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.593724", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.066291", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2092, "fingerprint": "2024|202400808|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400808|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a536f46ec01431e6", "measure_id": "202400808", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local Sebastopol TK-8 schools; modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and other school facilities; make health, safety and security improvements; and replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; shall the Sebastopol Union School District measure authorizing $24,000,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $1,400,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, at average rates of approximately $28 per $100,000 assessed value, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, No money for salaries and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4304, "no_votes": 2598, "total_votes": 6902, "percent_yes": 62.35873659808752, "percent_no": 37.64126340191248, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Sebastopol Union School District to issue $24 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Sebastopol Union School District to issue $24 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, improve school facilities, enhance health and safety systems, and replace portable classrooms with permanent structures. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of approximately $28 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.594060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.066444", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2072, "fingerprint": "2024|202400439|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400439|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0196047d5ead57d1", "measure_id": "202400439", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To encourage creation of middle class and workforce housing on underutilized parcels, should the City of Healdsburg exempt multi-family housing along certain portions of the Healdsburg Avenue corridor from the Growth Management Ordinance?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2615, "no_votes": 3325, "total_votes": 5940, "percent_yes": 44.023569023569024, "percent_no": 55.976430976430976, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have exempted multi-family housing developments along porti...", "summary_text": "The measure would have exempted multi-family housing developments along portions of the Healdsburg Avenue corridor from the city's Growth Management Ordinance restrictions. This exemption was intended to facilitate construction of middle-class and workforce housing on underutilized properties in those areas.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.459758", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.005515", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2085, "fingerprint": "2024|202400801|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400801|SONOMA", "content_hash": "db3b35dd96673570", "measure_id": "202400801", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair/ replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical and deteriorating plumbing systems; replace inefficient HVAC systems; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Bellevue Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $38,500,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, raising approximately $2,200,000 annually with projected average rates of approximately $29 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4784, "no_votes": 3136, "total_votes": 7920, "percent_yes": 60.4040404040404, "percent_no": 39.5959595959596, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Bellevue Union School District to issue $38", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Bellevue Union School District to issue $38.5 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, electrical and plumbing upgrades, HVAC system replacements, and classroom modernization. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of approximately $29 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.591679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.065314", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2078, "fingerprint": "2024|202400445|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400445|SONOMA", "content_hash": "7174d057ce0b0489", "measure_id": "202400445", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the proposed ordinance, to allow the Town Council to approve agreements for solid waste collection services for a term longer than ten (10) years and without competitive bidding, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3258, "no_votes": 9869, "total_votes": 13127, "percent_yes": 24.819075188542698, "percent_no": 75.1809248114573, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Solid Waste", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would have allowed Sonoma's Town Council to approve solid wast...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would have allowed Sonoma's Town Council to approve solid waste collection service agreements for terms exceeding ten years without requiring competitive bidding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.461522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.006588", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2087, "fingerprint": "2024|202400803|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400803|SONOMA", "content_hash": "2b905238ef1cc5e3", "measure_id": "202400803", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of Healdsburg elementary schools with no estimated increase to current tax rates; replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; make health/ safety improvements; and construct/ modernize classrooms and restrooms; shall Healdsburg Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1\u2019s measure authorizing $49,500,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, raising approximately $3,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, levying $29 per $100,000 assessed value, with audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries, and all money for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5052, "no_votes": 2744, "total_votes": 7796, "percent_yes": 64.80246280143663, "percent_no": 35.19753719856337, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Healdsburg Unified School District to issue $49,500,0...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Healdsburg Unified School District to issue $49,500,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, electrical system upgrades, health and safety improvements, and classroom and restroom construction and modernization. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $29 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising approximately $3,000,000 annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.592402", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.065630", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2071, "fingerprint": "2024|202400438|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400438|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c340976cd54b176c", "measure_id": "202400438", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted repealing the prohibition of the construction of roundabouts, traffic circles and other similar traffic features anywhere within the City of Cotati city limits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2278, "no_votes": 1499, "total_votes": 3777, "percent_yes": 60.31241726237755, "percent_no": 39.68758273762245, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Transport: Traffic Regulation/Reduction", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure repeals a prohibition on constructing roundabouts, traffic circle...", "summary_text": "The measure repeals a prohibition on constructing roundabouts, traffic circles, and similar traffic features within Cotati city limits, allowing such infrastructure to be built.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.459494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.005363", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2077, "fingerprint": "2024|202400444|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400444|SONOMA", "content_hash": "61f271ac768823e2", "measure_id": "202400444", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Sonoma measure to increase funding for essential city services, such as public safety, prompt emergency response times/ safe evacuation routes; improving traffic safety for pedestrians; maintaining streets/ sidewalks; enhancing youth recreation and parks; and funding affordable housing programs, by adopting a \u00bd percent sales tax, providing about $3,000,000 yearly for general governmental use until ended by voters, with independent audits, public disclosure of all spending, and all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3659, "no_votes": 2596, "total_votes": 6255, "percent_yes": 58.49720223820943, "percent_no": 41.50279776179057, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Sonoma's sales tax by 0", "summary_text": "This measure increased Sonoma's sales tax by 0.5 percent to generate approximately $3 million annually for general city services including public safety, emergency response, traffic safety, street maintenance, parks and recreation, and affordable housing programs. The tax will remain in effect until voters decide to end it, with provisions for independent audits and public disclosure of spending.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.461228", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.006416", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2076, "fingerprint": "2024|202400443|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400443|SONOMA", "content_hash": "642d1ad0c0a25a2d", "measure_id": "202400443", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain Sebastopol's City services such as 911 emergency medical/police/fire response, wildfire/emergency preparedness, maintenance of streets/roads, parks/trails, library, youth and senior services, retaining/attracting local businesses; and for general government use, shall the measure establishing a \u00bd-cent sales tax generating approximately $1,520,000 annually, terminating after 12 years, requiring audits, public spending disclosure, all funds used locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3252, "no_votes": 1260, "total_votes": 4512, "percent_yes": 72.07446808510637, "percent_no": 27.925531914893625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a half-cent sales tax in Sebastopol to fund city ser...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a half-cent sales tax in Sebastopol to fund city services including emergency response, infrastructure maintenance, parks, library, and business retention programs. The tax would generate approximately $1.52 million annually for 12 years with required audits and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.460917", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.006238", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2094, "fingerprint": "2024|202400810|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400810|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e7d3f4cab9022612", "measure_id": "202400810", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of Windsor schools; replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize or renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; and improve technology and energy-efficiency; shall Windsor Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $122,500,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $6,900,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, at average rates of approximately $57 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7041, "no_votes": 6960, "total_votes": 14001, "percent_yes": 50.28926505249625, "percent_no": 49.71073494750375, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Windsor Unified School District to issue $122", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Windsor Unified School District to issue $122.5 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom modernization, safety upgrades, and technology enhancements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $57 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.594694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.066780", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2068, "fingerprint": "2024|202400104|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400104|SONOMA", "content_hash": "28884e44c7ba147c", "measure_id": "202400104", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and enhance Sonoma County Library services such as: children\u2019s/teen books, summer reading programs, and homework help; career services/computer labs; book/digital/historical collections; keeping qualified librarians; senior services; disabled access; and maintaining hours seven days a week; shall the Sonoma County Library measure be adopted, renewing the current 1/8\u00a2 sales tax, providing $18,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, with independent auditing, citizen oversight, requiring all funds going to the Sonoma County Library, and no money for Sacramento?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 163825, "no_votes": 76803, "total_votes": 240628, "percent_yes": 68.08226806522931, "percent_no": 31.917731934770686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an existing 1/8 cent sales tax to fund Sonoma County Libr...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an existing 1/8 cent sales tax to fund Sonoma County Library services and operations, generating approximately $18 million annually until ended by voters. The tax would support library services including collections, programs, staffing, facilities maintenance, and extended operating hours.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.350066", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.951913", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2095, "fingerprint": "2024|202400811|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400811|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0acf4510be95c0c3", "measure_id": "202400811", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of schools; modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms, and education facilities; improve student access to technology; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Wright Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $29,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating approximately $1,700,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at average rates of approximately $29 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3812, "no_votes": 2764, "total_votes": 6576, "percent_yes": 57.968369829683695, "percent_no": 42.031630170316305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Wright Elementary School District to issue $29", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Wright Elementary School District to issue $29.2 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and education facilities, improve technology access, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would cost property owners approximately $29 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.594996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.066943", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2073, "fingerprint": "2024|202400440|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400440|SONOMA", "content_hash": "b236ce4392bf5108", "measure_id": "202400440", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to extend the term of Petaluma\u2019s Urban Growth Boundary (\u201cUGB\u201d) through December 31, 2050, and to modify UGB provisions concerning transit oriented development?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21560, "no_votes": 9199, "total_votes": 30759, "percent_yes": 70.09330602425307, "percent_no": 29.906693975746933, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Growth Cap/Boundary", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure extends Petaluma's Urban Growth Boundary through December 31, 205...", "summary_text": "The measure extends Petaluma's Urban Growth Boundary through December 31, 2050, and modifies provisions related to transit-oriented development within that boundary.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.460028", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.005666", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2088, "fingerprint": "2024|202400804|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400804|SONOMA", "content_hash": "74ee1e325a07ed70", "measure_id": "202400804", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ upgrade local elementary school classrooms, science labs, learning technology, art/ music facilities; improve fire/ earthquake safety/ campus security; remove hazardous materials like lead/ asbestos; repair/ replace leaky roofs, outdated portable classrooms, HVAC, electrical/ plumbing systems; shall Petaluma City Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $70,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, at $30 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($4,000,000 annually), with independent oversight, and no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11799, "no_votes": 5803, "total_votes": 17602, "percent_yes": 67.03215543688216, "percent_no": 32.967844563117836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Petaluma City Elementary School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Petaluma City Elementary School District to issue $70 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, science labs, safety systems, and infrastructure like roofs and HVAC systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.592710", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.065797", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2102, "fingerprint": "2024|202400815|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400815|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "49ade115bdc446aa", "measure_id": "202400815", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ replace leaking roofs/ and outdated heating, cooling, plumbing, electrical systems; improve student safety/ security; add classrooms to prevent overcrowding; renovate science labs; and replace the over 100-yearold agricultural science/ shop building at Hughson High School; shall Hughson Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $46,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with levies averaging $60 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding (approximately $2,900,000 annually) with independent oversight/ audits, no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3421, "no_votes": 2237, "total_votes": 5658, "percent_yes": 60.46306115235065, "percent_no": 39.53693884764935, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Hughson Unified School District to issue $46 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Hughson Unified School District to issue $46 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school infrastructure including roofs, HVAC systems, electrical and plumbing, add classrooms, renovate science labs, and replace a century-old agricultural building at Hughson High School. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging $60 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.596308", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.067600", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2098, "fingerprint": "2024|202400447|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400447|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "310080171ccdb032", "measure_id": "202400447", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to require online travel companies to collect hotel tax from visitors staying at hotels in the City of Turlock and allowing the Turlock City Council to increase the rate of the hotel tax to up to 14% of the rent paid for lodging, with tax proceeds for general government use, raising approximately $1.1 million annually, and lasting until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9680, "no_votes": 16081, "total_votes": 25761, "percent_yes": 37.57618104887233, "percent_no": 62.42381895112767, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required online travel companies to collect hotel tax...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required online travel companies to collect hotel taxes in Turlock and allowed the city council to increase the hotel tax rate up to 14% of lodging costs, with proceeds used for general government purposes. The measure was projected to generate approximately $1.1 million annually and would have remained in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.462083", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.006889", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2108, "fingerprint": "2024|202400821|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400821|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "f8ecea2b37f6636d", "measure_id": "202400821", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With no increase in current estimated tax rates, shall Riverbank Unified School District\u2019s measure to expand Career and Technical Education classrooms; replace aging restrooms and drinking fountains; and update security and emergency communications systems be adopted, authorizing $21.6 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $53 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $1.5 million annually while outstanding), citizen oversight, full public disclosure of spending, and no funds taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3413, "no_votes": 1629, "total_votes": 5042, "percent_yes": 67.69139230464101, "percent_no": 32.30860769535899, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Riverbank Unified School District to issue $21", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Riverbank Unified School District to issue $21.6 million in bonds to expand Career and Technical Education classrooms, replace aging restrooms and drinking fountains, and update security and emergency communications systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes with an estimated average levy below $53 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $1.5 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.598226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.068578", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2107, "fingerprint": "2024|202400820|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400820|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "228f1da9609c8560", "measure_id": "202400820", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Oakdale schools; expand/renovate career technical education classrooms and labs; replace leaky roofs; upgrade aging electrical, plumbing, and sewer; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Oakdale Joint Unified School Ballot Question: District\u2019s measure authorizing $105,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating approximately $6,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at average rates of approximately $58.16 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9010, "no_votes": 6412, "total_votes": 15422, "percent_yes": 58.42303203216185, "percent_no": 41.57696796783815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Oakdale Joint Unified School District to issue $10...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Oakdale Joint Unified School District to issue $105,500,000 in bonds to renovate and modernize school facilities, including career technical education spaces, roofs, utilities, and classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $58.16 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.597926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.068414", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2099, "fingerprint": "2024|202400812|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400812|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "36cf9f1612365d79", "measure_id": "202400812", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Riverbank Unified School District\u2019s measure to renovate classrooms; repair facilities including aging roofs, electrical and plumbing; and improve school and student safety be adopted, reauthorizing as new bonds $2,100,000, previously approved by voters in 2005, with levies below 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation (generating $770,000/year until repaid), legal rates, annual audits, taxpayer oversight, no increase in total approved debt and full disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1112, "no_votes": 827, "total_votes": 1939, "percent_yes": 57.34914904589995, "percent_no": 42.65085095410005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Riverbank Unified School District to issue $2,100,000...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Riverbank Unified School District to issue $2,100,000 in bonds to renovate classrooms, repair aging facilities including roofs, electrical and plumbing systems, and improve school safety. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of up to 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $770,000 annually until repaid.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.595300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.067110", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2097, "fingerprint": "2024|202400446|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400446|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "3c505cf468d003c1", "measure_id": "202400446", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the order be confirmed that was adopted on July 26, 2023, by the Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission ordering a reorganization consisting of annexation to the City of Patterson and detachment from the West Stanislaus Fire Protection District, West Stanislaus Irrigation District, Patterson Irrigation District, and Del Puerto Water District, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19, "no_votes": 10, "total_votes": 29, "percent_yes": 65.51724137931035, "percent_no": 34.48275862068965, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Incorporation/Formation/Annexation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure confirms the annexation of territory to the City of Patterson wh...", "summary_text": "This measure confirms the annexation of territory to the City of Patterson while detaching it from four local districts: West Stanislaus Fire Protection District, West Stanislaus Irrigation District, Patterson Irrigation District, and Del Puerto Water District. The reorganization was originally ordered by the Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission in July 2023 and has now been approved by voters.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-04-09", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.461788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.006736", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2096, "fingerprint": "2024|202400105|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400105|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "871cdc846614a336", "measure_id": "202400105", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Stanislaus County adopt an ordinance authorizing an annual tax on all cannabis businesses, in the unincorporated areas only, of up to: 4% of gross receipts, 8% retail gross receipts, the greater of 4% cultivation gross receipts or $8.00 per canopy square foot, generating approximately $1,700,000 revenues annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including strengthening neighborhood safety, community enhancement, eliminating illegal grows, and drug prevention and treatment, until repealed by voters.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 124466, "no_votes": 60826, "total_votes": 185292, "percent_yes": 67.17289467435184, "percent_no": 32.82710532564816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized Stanislaus County to impose an annual tax on cannabis ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized Stanislaus County to impose an annual tax on cannabis businesses in unincorporated areas at rates of up to 4% of gross receipts for most businesses, 8% for retail, and either 4% of gross receipts or $8 per square foot for cultivation operations. The tax is expected to generate approximately $1.7 million annually in unrestricted general revenue for the county.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.350366", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.952076", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2109, "fingerprint": "2024|202400822|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400822|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "018d66b90767915c", "measure_id": "202400822", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Salida Union School District\u2019s measure to replace leaky roofs; update security and emergency communication Ballot Question: systems; and ensure disabled access at Dena Boer, Mildred Perkins, Salida, Sisk Elementary Schools and Salida Middle School be adopted, authorizing $16 million of bonds with average levies below $19 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $1,039,000 annually) while outstanding, legal rates, citizen oversight, audits, public disclosure of spending and no projected increase in current tax rates?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4650, "no_votes": 2559, "total_votes": 7209, "percent_yes": 64.50270495214315, "percent_no": 35.49729504785685, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Salida Union School District to issue $16 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Salida Union School District to issue $16 million in bonds to fund roof repairs, security and emergency communication system updates, and disabled access improvements at five schools. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes with an average levy below $19 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $1,039,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.598558", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.068742", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2110, "fingerprint": "2024|202400823|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400823|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a7a9c03fe78087d5", "measure_id": "202400823", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Stanislaus Union School District\u2019s measure Ballot Question: to replace inefficient heating and air-conditioning systems; modernize classrooms for Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics programs; and improve student safety at Agnes Baptist Elementary, Eisenhut Elementary, Josephine Chrysler Elementary, Mary Lou Dieterich Elementary, Stanislaus Elementary, and Prescott Junior High be adopted authorizing $45 million of bonds with legal rates, average levies below $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding (raising $2,580,000 annually), audits, citizen oversight and full public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7221, "no_votes": 4005, "total_votes": 11226, "percent_yes": 64.32389096739712, "percent_no": 35.67610903260288, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Stanislaus Union School District to issue $45 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Stanislaus Union School District to issue $45 million in bonds to replace heating and air-conditioning systems, modernize classrooms for STEAM programs, and improve student safety at six schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.598893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.068911", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2105, "fingerprint": "2024|202400818|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400818|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "829404e45b4effdd", "measure_id": "202400818", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall NewmanCrows Landing Unified School District\u2019s measure expanding vocational and career training, special education, and counseling classrooms/ facilities at Bonita Elementary, Hunt Elementary, Hurd Barrington Elementary, Von Renner Elementary, Foothill Community Day, Yolo Jr. High, Orestimba High, and West Side Valley High be adopted, authorizing $30 million of bonds with legal rates, average levies below $45 per $100,000 assessed valuation (raising $1.7 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, audits, citizen oversight, State matching funds eligibility and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2808, "no_votes": 1918, "total_votes": 4726, "percent_yes": 59.41599661447313, "percent_no": 40.58400338552687, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District to issue $30 million in bonds to expand vocational training, special education, and counseling facilities across eight schools in the district. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging less than $45 per $100,000 of assessed property value, generating approximately $1.7 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.597264", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.068084", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2106, "fingerprint": "2024|202400819|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400819|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "32624d916cced5ad", "measure_id": "202400819", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District\u2019s measure to repair or replace leaky roofs, deteriorating classrooms and PE facilities at Bonita Elementary, Hunt Elementary, Hurd Barrington Elementary, Von Renner Elementary, Foothill Community Day, Yolo Jr. High, Orestimba High and West Side Valley High be adopted, authorizing $27 million of bonds with legal rates, average levies below $43 per $100,000 assessed valuation (raising $1.5 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, audits, citizen oversight, State matching funds eligibility and full public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2900, "no_votes": 1824, "total_votes": 4724, "percent_yes": 61.38865368331922, "percent_no": 38.61134631668078, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District to issue $27 million in bonds to repair or replace leaky roofs, deteriorating classrooms, and PE facilities at eight schools in the district. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below $43 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.597593", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.068249", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2103, "fingerprint": "2024|202400816|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400816|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "f508b9edacf74ea2", "measure_id": "202400816", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, build classrooms to replace outdated portables, repair and replace leaky roofs, and make health, safety and security improvements, shall the Keyes Union School District measure to issue $8,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $515,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $29 per $100,000 in assessed value, with citizens oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1348, "no_votes": 544, "total_votes": 1892, "percent_yes": 71.24735729386892, "percent_no": 28.752642706131084, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Keyes Union School District to issue $8", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Keyes Union School District to issue $8.5 million in bonds to modernize classrooms and facilities, replace portable buildings, repair roofs, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $29 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.596600", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.067765", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2111, "fingerprint": "2024|202400824|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400824|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "c02cb53cd27f79a6", "measure_id": "202400824", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Waterford Schools; modernize, upgrade and construct classrooms/restrooms/school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and airconditioning systems; make health, safety/security improvements; acquire, construct, improve sites/facilities/equipment, shall the Waterford Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $14,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $42.70 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating on average $841,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries, all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1945, "no_votes": 1732, "total_votes": 3677, "percent_yes": 52.896382920859395, "percent_no": 47.103617079140605, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Waterford Unified School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Waterford Unified School District to issue $14 million in bonds to modernize classrooms and school facilities, upgrade heating and ventilation systems, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $42.70 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.599193", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.069080", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2104, "fingerprint": "2024|202400817|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400817|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "b44cc4a90e6da461", "measure_id": "202400817", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ upgrade local elementary/ junior high schools; upgrade cafeterias/ multi-purpose rooms to fix leaking roofs, deteriorating plumbing/ restrooms; and provide instructional space for music, art, science, technology and engineering, shall Modesto City Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $85,000,000 in bonds at legal rates ($4,500,000 annually) at $29 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, requiring citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22600, "no_votes": 10395, "total_votes": 32995, "percent_yes": 68.4952265494772, "percent_no": 31.504773450522805, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Modesto City Elementary School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Modesto City Elementary School District to issue $85 million in bonds to repair and upgrade elementary and junior high school facilities, including cafeterias, roofs, plumbing, restrooms, and instructional spaces for music, art, science, technology and engineering. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $29 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.596930", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.067918", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2100, "fingerprint": "2024|202400813|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400813|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "e453a1c21efac034", "measure_id": "202400813", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/ upgrade local elementary, middle and high schools; improve campus safety/ security systems; repair/ replace leaky roofs, outdated heating, cooling, plumbing, electrical systems and deteriorating portables; and update classroom equipment/ learning technology, shall Ceres Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $114,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $60 per $100,000 of assessed value ($7,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent audits/ oversight and all funds for Ceres schools only?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10813, "no_votes": 5484, "total_votes": 16297, "percent_yes": 66.34963490212922, "percent_no": 33.650365097870775, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Ceres Unified School District to issue $114 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Ceres Unified School District to issue $114 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including safety systems, roofs, heating and cooling systems, and classroom technology. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.595605", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.067273", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2101, "fingerprint": "2024|202400814|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400814|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "483b22b643e681e5", "measure_id": "202400814", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade local schools; replace deteriorating roofs, heating/cooling systems; improve student safety/ security; and update/ construct classrooms/labs for science, technology, engineering, and math instruction, shall Denair Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $34,300,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying up to $60/$100,000 assessed value without exceeding current tax rates ($2,390,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, annual audits, and no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2714, "no_votes": 1512, "total_votes": 4226, "percent_yes": 64.22148603880738, "percent_no": 35.778513961192616, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Denair Unified School District to issue $34,300,0...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Denair Unified School District to issue $34,300,000 in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including roofs, heating/cooling systems, safety improvements, and science/technology classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of up to $60 per $100,000 of assessed value without exceeding current tax rates.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.595980", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.067438", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2113, "fingerprint": "2024|202400825|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400825|SUTTER", "content_hash": "cb95935d2478f2b8", "measure_id": "202400825", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SUTTER Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize the football stadium and athletic facilities; replace outdated continuation school classrooms, improve restrooms and school facilities; shall the Sutter Union High School District measure authorizing $13,800,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $840,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $25 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1271, "no_votes": 1115, "total_votes": 2386, "percent_yes": 53.26906957250629, "percent_no": 46.73093042749371, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Sutter Union High School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Sutter Union High School District to issue $13,800,000 in bonds to modernize the football stadium and athletic facilities, replace continuation school classrooms, and improve restrooms and other school facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $25 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating about $840,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.599494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.069246", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SUTTER Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2114, "fingerprint": "2024|202400826|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400826|SUTTER", "content_hash": "a61bc473c48735f1", "measure_id": "202400826", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SUTTER Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize district's athletic stadium including football field, track, bleachers, restrooms, snack bar and paved parking; rebuild unstable tennis/pickleball courts; shall the Sutter Union High School District measure authorizing $13,800,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $840,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at average rates of approximately $25 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1997, "no_votes": 1907, "total_votes": 3904, "percent_yes": 51.152663934426236, "percent_no": 48.847336065573764, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Sutter Union High School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Sutter Union High School District to issue $13,800,000 in bonds to modernize the district's athletic stadium and rebuild tennis/pickleball courts. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an average rate of approximately $25 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.599787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.069413", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SUTTER Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2112, "fingerprint": "2024|202400448|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400448|SUTTER", "content_hash": "cd0f7e7dd1a6f061", "measure_id": "202400448", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SUTTER Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support vital city services such as: road repairs; Increasing police and fire protection; protecting 911 emergency response times; addressing homelessness; and funding other general services and essential activity; shall an ordinance establishing a 1 percent sales tax in Yuba City, providing approximately $17,500,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring accountability, citizens' oversight and annual audits, with all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11480, "no_votes": 13440, "total_votes": 24920, "percent_yes": 46.06741573033708, "percent_no": 53.93258426966292, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.462418", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.007040", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SUTTER Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2115, "fingerprint": "2024|202400827|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400827|SUTTER", "content_hash": "e5a5d9fa7342690d", "measure_id": "202400827", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SUTTER Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Woodland Joint Unified School District's measure to remodel/ create Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics classrooms; and replace aging roofs, wiring, heating/ cooling systems be adopted authorizing $160 million of bonds with legal rates, levies averaging below $58 assessed valuation (raising $9 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, annual audits, citizen oversight, full public disclosure of spending and no funds for administrator salaries or benefits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15, "no_votes": 31, "total_votes": 46, "percent_yes": 32.608695652173914, "percent_no": 67.3913043478261, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Woodland Joint Unified School District...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Woodland Joint Unified School District to issue $160 million in bonds to remodel and create STEAM classrooms and replace aging infrastructure like roofs, wiring, and heating/cooling systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies averaging below $58 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $9 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.600077", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.069568", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SUTTER Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10954, "fingerprint": "2024|PROP_6|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|PROP_6|Statewide", "content_hash": "ff5422adfb9535f7", "measure_id": "PROP_6", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 6, Remove Involuntary Servitude as Punishment for Crime Amendment (2024)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[4] \u201c Eliminates constitutional provision allowing involuntary servitude for incarcerated persons. Legislative constitutional amendment.[5] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[4]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6895604, "no_votes": 7882137, "total_votes": 14777741, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6,_Remove_Involuntary_Servitude_as_Punishment_for_Crime_Amendment_(2024)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[4]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[4] \u201c Amends the California Constitution to remove current provision that allows jails and prisons to impose involuntary servitude to punish crime (i.e., forcing incarcerated persons to work).[5] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:44.738306", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:44.738306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:44.738306", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 6, Remove Involuntary Servitude as Punishment for Crime Amendment (2024)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(2024)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2024/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2024", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%202024", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%202024", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10953, "fingerprint": "2024|PROP_5|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|PROP_5|Statewide", "content_hash": "3af196774cda4f58", "measure_id": "PROP_5", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 5, Lower Supermajority Requirement to 55% for Local Bond Measures to Fund Housing and Public Infrastructure Amendment (2024)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[5] \u201c Allows local bonds for affordable housing and public infrastructure with 55% voter approval. Legislative constitutional amendment.[6] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows: [5]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6738890, "no_votes": 8239337, "total_votes": 14978227, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5,_Lower_Supermajority_Requirement_to_55%25_for_Local_Bond_Measures_to_Fund_Housing_and_Public_Infrastructure_Amendment_(2024)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[5]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows: [5] \u201c Allows approval of local infrastructure and housing bonds for low- and middle-income Californians with 55% vote. Accountability requirements.[6] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:43.145719", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:43.145719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:43.145719", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 5, Lower Supermajority Requirement to 55% for Local Bond Measures to Fund Housing and Public Infrastructure Amendment (2024)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(2024)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2024/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2024", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%202024", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%202024", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10952, "fingerprint": "2024|PROP_4|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|PROP_4|Statewide", "content_hash": "57f484c984b3e2f7", "measure_id": "PROP_4", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 4, Parks, Environment, Energy, and Water Bond Measure (2024)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[4] \u201c Authorizes bonds for safe drinking water, wildfire prevention, and protecting communities and natural lands from climate risks. Legislative statute.[5] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[4]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9055116, "no_votes": 6086414, "total_votes": 15141530, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4,_Parks,_Environment,_Energy,_and_Water_Bond_Measure_(2024)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[4]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[4] \u201c Authorizes $10 billion in general obligation bonds for water, wildfire prevention, and protection of communities and lands. Requires annual audits.[5] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:41.786442", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:41.786442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:41.786442", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 4, Parks, Environment, Energy, and Water Bond Measure (2024)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(2024)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2024/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2024", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%202024", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%202024", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10951, "fingerprint": "2024|PROP_3|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|PROP_3|Statewide", "content_hash": "005c853c8e8dbe53", "measure_id": "PROP_3", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 3, Right to Marry and Repeal Proposition 8 Amendment (2024)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title is as follows:[5] \u201c Constitutional right to marriage. Legislative constitutional amendment.[6] \u201d The ballot summary is as follows:[5]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9477435, "no_votes": 5658187, "total_votes": 15135622, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3,_Right_to_Marry_and_Repeal_Proposition_8_Amendment_(2024)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title is as follows:[5]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary is as follows:[5] \u201c Amends California Constitution to recognize fundamental right to marry, regardless of sex or race. Removes language in California Constitution stating that marriage is only between a man and a woman.[6] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:40.047233", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:40.047233", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:40.047233", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 3, Right to Marry and Repeal Proposition 8 Amendment (2024)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(2024)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2024/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2024", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%202024", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%202024", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10950, "fingerprint": "2024|PROP_36|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|PROP_36|Statewide", "content_hash": "b4bc837e4f9679eb", "measure_id": "PROP_36", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 36, Drug and Theft Crime Penalties and Treatment-Mandated Felonies Initiative (2024)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[9] \u201c Allows felony charges and increases sentences for certain drug and theft crimes. Initiative statute.[10] \u201d The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[9]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10307296, "no_votes": 4756612, "total_votes": 15063908, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_36,_Drug_and_Theft_Crime_Penalties_and_Treatment-Mandated_Felonies_Initiative_(2024)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[9]", "summary_text": "The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[9] \u201c Allows felony charges for possessing certain drugs, including fentanyl, and for thefts under $950\u2014both currently chargeable only as misdemeanors\u2014with two prior drug or two prior theft convictions, as applicable. Defendants who plead guilty to felony drug possession and complete treatment can have charges dismissed. Increases sentences for other specified drug and theft crimes. Increased prison sentences may reduce savings that currently fund mental health and drug treatment programs, K-12 schools, and crime victims; any remaining savings may be used for new felony treatment program.[10] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:39.054714", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:39.054714", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:39.054714", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 36, Drug and Theft Crime Penalties and Treatment-Mandated Felonies Initiative (2024)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_36_(2024)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2024/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2024", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2036%202024", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2036%202024", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 10949, "fingerprint": "2024|PROP_35|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|PROP_35|Statewide", "content_hash": "af1bd4d3f8984581", "measure_id": "PROP_35", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 35, Managed Care Organization Tax Authorization Initiative (2024)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[6] \u201c Provides permanent funding for Medi-Cal Health Care Services. Initiative statute.[7] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[6]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10124174, "no_votes": 4783434, "total_votes": 14907608, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_35,_Managed_Care_Organization_Tax_Authorization_Initiative_(2024)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[6]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[6] \u201c Makes permanent the existing tax on managed health care insurance plans, currently set to expire in 2026, which the state uses to pay for health care services for low-income families with children, seniors, people with disabilities, and other groups covered by the Medi-Cal program. Requires revenues to be used only for specified Medi-Cal services, including primary and specialty care, emergency care, family planning, mental health, and prescription drugs. Prohibits revenues from being used to replace other existing Medi-Cal funding. Caps administrative expenses and requires independent audits of programs receiving funding.[7] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:38.347325", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:38.347325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:38.347325", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 35, Managed Care Organization Tax Authorization Initiative (2024)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_35_(2024)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2024/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2024", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2035%202024", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2035%202024", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10948, "fingerprint": "2024|PROP_34|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|PROP_34|Statewide", "content_hash": "40442a569aad1abf", "measure_id": "PROP_34", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 34, Require Certain Participants in Medi-Cal Rx Program to Spend 98% of Revenues on Patient Care Initiative (2024)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title is as follows:[6] \u201c Restricts spending by health care providers meeting specified criteria. Initiative statute.[7] \u201d The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets is as follows:[6]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7378686, "no_votes": 7121317, "total_votes": 14500003, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_34,_Require_Certain_Participants_in_Medi-Cal_Rx_Program_to_Spend_98%25_of_Revenues_on_Patient_Care_Initiative_(2024)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title is as follows:[6]", "summary_text": "The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets is as follows:[6] \u201c Requires certain health care providers to spend 98% of revenues from federal discount prescription drug program on direct patient care. Applies only to health care providers that: spent over $100,000,000 in any ten-year period on anything other than direct patient care; and operated multifamily housing with over 500 high-severity health and safety violations. Penalizes noncompliance by revoking health care licenses and tax-exempt status. Permanently authorizes state to negotiate Medi-Cal drug prices on statewide basis.[7] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:37.100967", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:37.100967", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:37.100967", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 34, Require Certain Participants in Medi-Cal Rx Program to Spend 98% of Revenues on Patient Care Initiative (2024)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_34_(2024)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2024/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2024", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2034%202024", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2034%202024", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10947, "fingerprint": "2024|PROP_33|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|PROP_33|Statewide", "content_hash": "fa77d9e92e73bd3a", "measure_id": "PROP_33", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 33, Prohibit State Limitations on Local Rent Control Initiative (2024)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[6] \u201c Expands local governments' authority to enact rent control on residential property. Initiative statute.[7] \u201d The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[6]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5979880, "no_votes": 8975542, "total_votes": 14955422, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_33,_Prohibit_State_Limitations_on_Local_Rent_Control_Initiative_(2024)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[6]", "summary_text": "The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[6] \u201c Current state law (the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act of 1995) generally prevents cities and counties from limiting the initial rental rate that landlords may charge to new tenants in all types of housing, and from limiting rent increases for existing tenants in (1) residential properties that were first occupied after February 1, 1995; (2) single-family homes; and (3) condominiums. This measure would repeal that state law and would prohibit the state from limiting the right of cities and counties to maintain, enact, or expand residential rent-control ordinances.[7] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:36.780283", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:36.780283", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:36.780283", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 33, Prohibit State Limitations on Local Rent Control Initiative (2024)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_33_(2024)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2024/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2024", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2033%202024", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2033%202024", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10946, "fingerprint": "2024|PROP_32|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|PROP_32|Statewide", "content_hash": "212fe857e5b1c1d1", "measure_id": "PROP_32", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 32, $18 Minimum Wage Initiative (2024)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[5] The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[5] \u201c Existing law requires annual increases to California\u2019s minimum wage until it has reached $15.00 per hour for all businesses on January 1, 2023. This measure extends these annual increases ($1.00 per year) until minimum wage\u2014currently, $15.00 per hour for businesses with 26 or more employees, and $14.00 per hour for smaller businesses\u2014reaches $18.00 per hour. Thereafter, as existing law requires, the minimum wage will annually adjust for inflation. In periods of decreased economic activity, or General Fund deficit, the Governor may suspend annual increase up to two times, thereby extending timeline for reaching $18.00 per hour.[6] \u201d", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7469803, "no_votes": 7686126, "total_votes": 15155929, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_32,_$18_Minimum_Wage_Initiative_(2024)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[5]", "summary_text": "The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[5] \u201c Existing law requires annual increases to California\u2019s minimum wage until it has reached $15.00 per hour for all businesses on January 1, 2023. This measure extends these annual increases ($1.00 per year) until minimum wage\u2014currently, $15.00 per hour for businesses with 26 or more employees, and $14.00 per hour for smaller businesses\u2014reaches $18.00 per hour. Thereafter, as existing law requires, the minimum wage will annually adjust for inflation. In periods of decreased economic activity, or General Fund deficit, the Governor may suspend annual increase up to two times, thereby extending timeline for reaching $18.00 per hour.[6] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:36.530900", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:36.530900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:36.530900", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 32, $18 Minimum Wage Initiative (2024)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_32_(2024)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2024/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2024", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2032%202024", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2032%202024", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 10945, "fingerprint": "2024|PROP_2|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|PROP_2|Statewide", "content_hash": "b3953659fec8700f", "measure_id": "PROP_2", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 2, Public Education Facilities Bond Measure (2024)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[4] \u201c Authorizes bonds for public school and community college facilities. Legislative statute.[5] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[4]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8820842, "no_votes": 6207390, "total_votes": 15028232, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2,_Public_Education_Facilities_Bond_Measure_(2024)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[4]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[4] \u201c Authorizes $10 billion in general obligation bonds for repair, upgrade, and construction of facilities at K\u201312 public schools (including charter schools), community colleges, and career technical education programs, including for improvement of health and safety conditions and classroom upgrades. Requires annual audits.[5] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:35.195973", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:35.195973", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:35.195973", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 2, Public Education Facilities Bond Measure (2024)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(2024)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2024/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2024", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%202024", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%202024", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10944, "fingerprint": "2024|PROP_1|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|PROP_1|Statewide", "content_hash": "8480337622345331", "measure_id": "PROP_1", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 1, Behavioral Health Services Program and Bond Measure (March 2024)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[10] \u201c Authorizes $6.38 billion in bonds to build mental health treatment facilities for those with mental health and substance use challenges; provides housing for the homeless. Legislative statute.[11] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[10]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3636678, "no_votes": 3610436, "total_votes": 7247114, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1,_Behavioral_Health_Services_Program_and_Bond_Measure_(March_2024)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[10]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[10] \u201c Amends Mental Health Services Act to provide additional behavioral health services.[11] \u201d", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": "2024-03-05T00:00:00", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:33.662104", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:33.662104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:33.662104", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 1, Behavioral Health Services Program and Bond Measure (March 2024)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(2024)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2024/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2024", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%202024", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%202024", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 2120, "fingerprint": "2024|202400828|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400828|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "b83e9b9cfa096736", "measure_id": "202400828", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TEHAMA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education at Corning elementary and middle schools; replace leaky roofs; make safety and security improvements; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and renovate, upgrade, and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and facilities; shall Corning Union Elementary School District's measure authorizing $13,700,000 in bonds, at legal rates, and levying approximately $28.84 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $809,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2507, "no_votes": 1622, "total_votes": 4129, "percent_yes": 60.71688060062969, "percent_no": 39.28311939937031, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Corning Union Elementary School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Corning Union Elementary School District to issue $13.7 million in bonds to fund infrastructure improvements including roof repairs, safety upgrades, electrical system improvements, and classroom renovations at elementary and middle schools. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $28.84 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.600364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.069721", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TEHAMA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2121, "fingerprint": "2024|202400829|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400829|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "4c0bb3130acc5997", "measure_id": "202400829", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TEHAMA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Lassen View Elementary School; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; and replace outdated HVAC systems; shall the Lassen View Union Elementary School District measure authorizing $3,500,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $232,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a board appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 721, "no_votes": 548, "total_votes": 1269, "percent_yes": 56.816390858944054, "percent_no": 43.183609141055946, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Lassen View Union Elementary School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Lassen View Union Elementary School District to issue $3.5 million in bonds to construct and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities, including roof repairs, safety improvements, and HVAC system replacements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising about $232,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.600661", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.069912", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TEHAMA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2122, "fingerprint": "2024|202400830|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400830|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "44b243da8c15254b", "measure_id": "202400830", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TEHAMA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade local schools with classrooms/ facilities preparing students for future jobs and apprenticeships; replace leaky roofs, plumbing, electrical; improve campus safety and supervision/ wellness of students; acquire/ construct/ modernize facilities, shall Red Bluff Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure authorizing $33.6 million of bonds at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value (averaging $2.5 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8884, "no_votes": 9706, "total_votes": 18590, "percent_yes": 47.789133942980094, "percent_no": 52.210866057019906, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Red Bluff Joint Union High School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Red Bluff Joint Union High School District to issue $33.6 million in bonds to upgrade school facilities, replace infrastructure, and improve campus safety. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.600999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.070090", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TEHAMA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2123, "fingerprint": "2024|202400831|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400831|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "e878d878a52ad1dc", "measure_id": "202400831", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TEHAMA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; make safety and security improvements; replace leaky roofs; modernize, renovate, and upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace aging plumbing, sewer, and electrical systems; shall Red Bluff Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $19,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value ($1,100,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for administrative salaries and all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4185, "no_votes": 3982, "total_votes": 8167, "percent_yes": 51.242806416064646, "percent_no": 48.757193583935354, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Red Bluff Union Elementary School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Red Bluff Union Elementary School District to issue $19 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom modernization, and upgrades to plumbing, sewer, and electrical systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.601330", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.070293", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TEHAMA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2119, "fingerprint": "2024|202400452|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400452|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "80237bb7764d994c", "measure_id": "202400452", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TEHAMA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be Appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 101, "no_votes": 79, "total_votes": 180, "percent_yes": 56.111111111111114, "percent_no": 43.888888888888886, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure makes the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer in Tehama a...", "summary_text": "This measure makes the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer in Tehama appointive positions rather than elected offices. The change would allow these officials to be appointed by the city government instead of being chosen directly by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.463582", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.007638", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TEHAMA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2116, "fingerprint": "2024|202400449|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400449|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "35850e06ff87c8ee", "measure_id": "202400449", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TEHAMA Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Offices of the Corning City Clerk and Corning City Treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 857, "no_votes": 808, "total_votes": 1665, "percent_yes": 51.471471471471475, "percent_no": 48.528528528528525, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure makes the positions of Corning City Clerk and Corning City Treas...", "summary_text": "This measure makes the positions of Corning City Clerk and Corning City Treasurer appointive offices rather than elected positions. The offices will now be filled by appointment instead of through public elections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.462731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.007191", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TEHAMA Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2117, "fingerprint": "2024|202400450|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400450|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "a524480e55f237d8", "measure_id": "202400450", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TEHAMA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1973, "no_votes": 2577, "total_votes": 4550, "percent_yes": 43.362637362637365, "percent_no": 56.637362637362635, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.463028", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.007341", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TEHAMA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2118, "fingerprint": "2024|202400451|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400451|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "860a15fae4010412", "measure_id": "202400451", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TEHAMA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure providing Red Bluff funding to fix potholes; maintain and repair deteriorating local streets and roads; reduce expensive future repairs; improve safety for drivers, pedestrians, disabled residents, including safe routes to children's school; and make the City eligible for state/ federal matching funds, by establishing a locally controlled 3/4 cent sales tax providing approximately $3,800,000 annually for 20 years; requiring independent audits and public disclosure, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3189, "no_votes": 1661, "total_votes": 4850, "percent_yes": 65.75257731958763, "percent_no": 34.24742268041237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a 0.75% local sales tax in Red Bluff for 20 years to generate approximately $3.8 million annually for road maintenance, pothole repairs, and street improvements. The measure also includes requirements for independent audits and public disclosure of how the funds are used.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.463294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.007487", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TEHAMA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2124, "fingerprint": "2024|202400832|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400832|TRINITY", "content_hash": "91fd02c44de6acbe", "measure_id": "202400832", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TRINITY Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade outdated facilities, classrooms, and labs used for job training and science/ technology education, deteriorating roofs, electrical wiring, and plumbing, and aging student housing; and acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment, shall Redwoods Community College District's measure be adopted authorizing $120,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, ($8,400,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with audits, independent oversight, and no money for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57, "no_votes": 93, "total_votes": 150, "percent_yes": 38.0, "percent_no": 62.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Redwoods Community College District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Redwoods Community College District to issue $120 million in bonds to repair and upgrade facilities including classrooms, labs, roofs, electrical and plumbing systems, and student housing. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes of $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.601625", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.070466", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TRINITY Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2127, "fingerprint": "2024|202400834|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400834|TULARE", "content_hash": "7b5fcd3fde579a73", "measure_id": "202400834", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/update vocational/career, science, engineering, agricultural classrooms/labs; remove asbestos/ mold; provide safe drinking water; acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment, wiring, gas lines, leaky roofs; upgrade, security, emergency communications systems; shall Dinuba Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $42,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation ($2,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring oversight, public spending disclosure, all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4213, "no_votes": 2500, "total_votes": 6713, "percent_yes": 62.758826158200506, "percent_no": 37.241173841799494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Dinuba Unified School District to issue $42 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Dinuba Unified School District to issue $42 million in bonds to repair and update school facilities, including vocational classrooms, labs, safety systems, and infrastructure improvements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $2.8 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.602234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.070783", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2135, "fingerprint": "2024|202400842|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400842|TULARE", "content_hash": "284f50ad23162266", "measure_id": "202400842", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; make health, safety and security improvements; upgrade HVAC systems; and construct/ renovate/ modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Tulare Joint Union High School District's measure authorizing $80,000,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating on average $5,400,000 annually, at average rates of approximately $29 per $100,000 assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, all money staying local, with no projected increase to existing tax rates?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14329, "no_votes": 9220, "total_votes": 23549, "percent_yes": 60.84759437768058, "percent_no": 39.15240562231942, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Tulare Joint Union High School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Tulare Joint Union High School District to issue $80 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including HVAC upgrades, classroom and restroom renovations, and health and safety enhancements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of approximately $29 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.604728", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.072108", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2126, "fingerprint": "2024|202400833|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400833|TULARE", "content_hash": "401697bb80482b57", "measure_id": "202400833", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make security improvements; and replace outdated heating, ventilation and air\u00adconditioning systems; shall Burton School District's measure to issue $7,100,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $446,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, all money staying local, at rates of approximately $18.40 per $100,000 assessed value, with no projected increase to currently existing tax rates?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3087, "no_votes": 2410, "total_votes": 5497, "percent_yes": 56.15790431144261, "percent_no": 43.84209568855739, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes Burton School District to issue $7", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes Burton School District to issue $7.1 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, make security improvements, and replace heating and air conditioning systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $18.40 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating an average of $446,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.601932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.070619", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2129, "fingerprint": "2024|202400836|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400836|TULARE", "content_hash": "c8a3e7d32ef982bb", "measure_id": "202400836", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade local elementary and middle schools, improve safety and security, repair electrical systems, replace outdated plumbing, improve systems to provide clean water, and upgrade classrooms to meet modem technology standards, shall Earlimart School District's measure to issue $8,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of $540,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, at a rate of $30 per $100,000 assessed value, be adopted, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 942, "no_votes": 212, "total_votes": 1154, "percent_yes": 81.62911611785096, "percent_no": 18.370883882149045, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes Earlimart School District to issue $8", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes Earlimart School District to issue $8.5 million in bonds to fund repairs and upgrades to local elementary and middle schools, including safety improvements, electrical and plumbing system repairs, clean water systems, and classroom technology upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, with oversight and audit requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.602897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.071100", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2130, "fingerprint": "2024|202400837|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400837|TULARE", "content_hash": "ace0500b62a3dc87", "measure_id": "202400837", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade vocational education and performing arts classrooms and facilities; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and upgrade playfields; shall Exeter Unified School District's measure be adopted issuing $26,600,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $1,500,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $45 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3149, "no_votes": 3082, "total_votes": 6231, "percent_yes": 50.53763440860215, "percent_no": 49.46236559139785, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized Exeter Unified School District to issue $26...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized Exeter Unified School District to issue $26,600,000 in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, upgrade vocational education and performing arts facilities, and improve playfields. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $45 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.603187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.071255", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2132, "fingerprint": "2024|202400839|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400839|TULARE", "content_hash": "702c576b0a7e76ae", "measure_id": "202400839", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of local schools; improve safety and security; acquire and improve school facilities, including multi-purpose areas for science, teachnology, math, music and the arts, shall Pleasant View Elementary School District's measure be adopted authorizing $3,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with estimated levies of approximately $59 per $100,000 assessed value, generating on average $204,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, with annual reports, no money for salaries and all money improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 275, "no_votes": 110, "total_votes": 385, "percent_yes": 71.42857142857143, "percent_no": 28.57142857142857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Pleasant View Elementary School District to issue $3,...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Pleasant View Elementary School District to issue $3,000,000 in bonds to acquire and improve school facilities, including multi-purpose areas for science, technology, math, music and arts. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately $59 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating an average of $204,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.603847", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.071558", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2131, "fingerprint": "2024|202400838|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400838|TULARE", "content_hash": "1c8c870b9302cbf9", "measure_id": "202400838", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of schools; replace outdated HVAC systems; construct/ renovate/ modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health and safety and energy efficiency improvements; shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District's measure authorizing $20,000,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $1,100,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, at average rates of approximately $23.48 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 666, "no_votes": 606, "total_votes": 1272, "percent_yes": 52.358490566037744, "percent_no": 47.641509433962256, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Kingsburg Joint Union High School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District to issue $20 million in bonds to replace HVAC systems, construct and modernize school facilities, and make health, safety and energy efficiency improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an average rate of approximately $23.48 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.603520", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.071408", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2133, "fingerprint": "2024|202400840|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400840|TULARE", "content_hash": "8fb346c79f332e6f", "measure_id": "202400840", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall the Sequoia Union Elementary School District measure to issue $3,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $219,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $30 per $100,000 in assessed value, with citizens oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 493, "no_votes": 500, "total_votes": 993, "percent_yes": 49.64753272910373, "percent_no": 50.35246727089627, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Sequoia Union Elementary School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Sequoia Union Elementary School District to issue $3.4 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, health and safety upgrades, classroom modernization, and replacement of temporary portables with permanent classrooms. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.604141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.071712", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2128, "fingerprint": "2024|202400835|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400835|TULARE", "content_hash": "a5c785f77bc5c087", "measure_id": "202400835", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of our local school; construct and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and student support facilities; make security and safety improvements; and replace and upgrade old plumbing and electrical systems; shall Ducor Union Elementary School District's measure to issue $2,900,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, with average levies of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value (approximately $199,700 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, annual audits, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 153, "no_votes": 142, "total_votes": 295, "percent_yes": 51.864406779661024, "percent_no": 48.135593220338976, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Ducor Union Elementary School District...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Ducor Union Elementary School District to issue $2.9 million in bonds to construct and modernize school facilities, including classrooms, restrooms, and support facilities, as well as upgrade plumbing, electrical, and safety systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.602578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.070946", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2125, "fingerprint": "2024|202400453|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400453|TULARE", "content_hash": "136959f5d1185948", "measure_id": "202400453", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to fund general governmental services such as public safety, emergency response, youth programs, addressing homelessness, and maintaining public spaces, by taxing cannabis businesses at a rate not exceeding 10% of gross receipts, or up to $10/square foot for cultivation, raising approximately $500,000 annually, requiring spending disclosures, which would only be levied if state law mandates or the Council approves an ordinance allowing such businesses, lasting until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35136, "no_votes": 14162, "total_votes": 49298, "percent_yes": 71.27266826240415, "percent_no": 28.727331737595847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a tax on cannabis businesses in Tulare at up to 10% ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a tax on cannabis businesses in Tulare at up to 10% of gross receipts or $10 per square foot for cultivation to fund general government services, generating approximately $500,000 annually. The tax would only apply if state law requires it or the City Council passes an ordinance allowing cannabis businesses to operate in the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.463897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.007786", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2134, "fingerprint": "2024|202400841|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400841|TULARE", "content_hash": "9f313c9e9792be24", "measure_id": "202400841", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade local colleges/education centers; improve nursing, paramedic, firefighter, police/agriculture/manufacturing and vocational training; fix leaky roofs, asbestos, lead paint; sewer lines; protect drinking water; acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment; shall State Center Community College District's measure authorizing $698,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation ($42,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with oversight, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4891, "no_votes": 3709, "total_votes": 8600, "percent_yes": 56.87209302325581, "percent_no": 43.12790697674419, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the State Center Community College District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the State Center Community College District to issue $698 million in bonds to upgrade college facilities, improve vocational training programs, and address infrastructure issues like leaky roofs, asbestos, and sewer systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 2 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $42 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.604438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.071931", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2136, "fingerprint": "2024|202400106|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400106|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "eface6b23d48f797", "measure_id": "202400106", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TUOLUMNE Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Measure A is not a tax. It is an advisory measure telling current and future Tuolumne County leadership how voters wish Measure Z funds to be spent, if approved. Do you support Measure Z funds being prioritized to maintain competitive deputy sheriff compensation, sustain new and existing fire stations, and increase rural, residential road maintenance?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17967, "no_votes": 6700, "total_votes": 24667, "percent_yes": 72.83820488912312, "percent_no": 27.16179511087688, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asks Tuolumne County voters whether they support priori...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asks Tuolumne County voters whether they support prioritizing Measure Z funds for deputy sheriff compensation, fire stations, and rural road maintenance. The measure provides non-binding guidance to county leadership on spending priorities if Measure Z is approved.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.350683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.952227", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TUOLUMNE Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2138, "fingerprint": "2024|202400843|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400843|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "c603200f494279bb", "measure_id": "202400843", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TUOLUMNE Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of local high schools; make health, safety, and security improvements; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms, school, and sports facilities; improve technology infrastructure; and replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; shall Summerville Union High School District's measure authorizing $13,000,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating approximately $753,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, at average rates of $17 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2460, "no_votes": 2675, "total_votes": 5135, "percent_yes": 47.906523855890946, "percent_no": 52.093476144109054, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Summerville Union High School District...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Summerville Union High School District to issue $13 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom construction and modernization, health and safety upgrades, technology infrastructure improvements, and replacement of portable classrooms. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $17 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.605018", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.072262", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TUOLUMNE Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2137, "fingerprint": "2024|202400107|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400107|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "c8e83290b261a1f6", "measure_id": "202400107", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TUOLUMNE Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support essential Tuolumne County services including law enforcement, fire services, and road maintenance, shall the measure increasing the Sales Tax (Transactions and Use Tax) rate from 7.25% to 8 .25% in the unincorporated areas of Tuolumne County, providing approximately $6,200,000 in annual revenue that cannot be taken by the State, subject to an annual audit, and expiring in 20 years, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11034, "no_votes": 14625, "total_votes": 25659, "percent_yes": 43.002455278849524, "percent_no": 56.997544721150476, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.351002", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:56.952378", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TUOLUMNE Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2148, "fingerprint": "2024|202400845|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400845|VENTURA", "content_hash": "7943f0bcdcd37819", "measure_id": "202400845", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade, modernize, and construct elementary and middle school classrooms, restrooms and facilities; replace outdated heating, air-conditioning systems; improve safety/security; and repair roofs; shall Santa Paula Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 measure authorizing $55,900,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating on average $3,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $60 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2169, "no_votes": 2115, "total_votes": 4284, "percent_yes": 50.63025210084034, "percent_no": 49.36974789915966, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Santa Paula Unified School District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Santa Paula Unified School District to issue $55.9 million in bonds to upgrade and construct elementary and middle school facilities, including classrooms, restrooms, HVAC systems, safety improvements, and roof repairs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating an average of $3.3 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.605595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.072585", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2149, "fingerprint": "2024|202400846|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400846|VENTURA", "content_hash": "eafaa6fcf507b06a", "measure_id": "202400846", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education at local high schools; make safety and security improvements; replace leaky roofs; upgrade heating/air-conditioning systems; and construct, modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Santa Paula Unified School District measure authorizing $36,000,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating on average $1,700,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $28 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2595, "no_votes": 2426, "total_votes": 5021, "percent_yes": 51.682931686914955, "percent_no": 48.317068313085045, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Santa Paula Unified School District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Santa Paula Unified School District to issue $36 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, HVAC upgrades, classroom modernization, and safety enhancements at local high schools. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $28 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating an average of $1.7 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.605936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.072743", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2147, "fingerprint": "2024|202400844|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400844|VENTURA", "content_hash": "b754064fc262d47e", "measure_id": "202400844", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade, modernize, and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health, safety, and security improvements; and renovate plumbing and sewer systems; shall Hueneme Elementary School District issue $53,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising on average $3,060,000 annually at a rate of approximately $.0298 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3621, "no_votes": 1838, "total_votes": 5459, "percent_yes": 66.33082982231177, "percent_no": 33.66917017768823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Hueneme Elementary School District to issue $53,70...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Hueneme Elementary School District to issue $53,700,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom construction and modernization, roof repairs, safety upgrades, and plumbing renovations. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $0.0298 per $100 of assessed value and include oversight provisions and restrictions on salary expenditures.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.605307", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.072424", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2151, "fingerprint": "2024|202400848|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400848|VENTURA", "content_hash": "914270a28045cf30", "measure_id": "202400848", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education at local high schools; modernize/expand/construct career technical education facilities; make health, safety and security improvements; and replace HVAC and deteriorating plumbing/sewer systems; shall Oxnard Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $285,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $21,780,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, all money staying local, at rates of approximately $17.84 per $100,000 assessed value, with no projected increase to existing tax rates?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64429, "no_votes": 49082, "total_votes": 113511, "percent_yes": 56.76013778400332, "percent_no": 43.23986221599668, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Oxnard Union High School District to issue $285 mi...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Oxnard Union High School District to issue $285 million in bonds to modernize facilities, construct career technical education buildings, make safety improvements, and replace aging infrastructure systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $17.84 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.606553", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.073046", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2150, "fingerprint": "2024|202400847|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400847|VENTURA", "content_hash": "1acb2325544d8690", "measure_id": "202400847", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair and replace leaky roofs, plumbing, electrical, and HVAC systems; modernize, upgrade, and renovate classrooms and restrooms; and update security and safety; shall the Briggs Elementary School District measure to issue $4,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $314,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $30 per $100,000 in assessed value, with strict accountability, including citizens oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 554, "no_votes": 435, "total_votes": 989, "percent_yes": 56.01617795753286, "percent_no": 43.98382204246714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Briggs Elementary School District to issue $4", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Briggs Elementary School District to issue $4.9 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, plumbing and electrical system upgrades, classroom and restroom modernization, and security enhancements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating an average of $314,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.606254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.072896", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2154, "fingerprint": "2024|202400851|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400851|VENTURA", "content_hash": "73701828291d50d1", "measure_id": "202400851", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To aid in preserving, improving and expanding academic programs including reading, writing, music, art, science and math; attract and retain qualified teachers; and maintain school mental health programs, shall Ventura Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted renewing its existing parcel tax for eight years at the same rate of $59 per parcel, raising approximately $2.5 million annually, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds spent on local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39863, "no_votes": 20121, "total_votes": 59984, "percent_yes": 66.45605494798613, "percent_no": 33.54394505201387, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews Ventura Unified School District's existing $59 annual par...", "summary_text": "This measure renews Ventura Unified School District's existing $59 annual parcel tax for eight years to fund academic programs, teacher retention, and mental health services. The tax is expected to generate approximately $2.5 million annually with independent oversight ensuring funds are spent on local schools.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.607514", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.073536", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2140, "fingerprint": "2024|202400455|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400455|VENTURA", "content_hash": "b77b2ea6cda0c281", "measure_id": "202400455", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Oxnard-sponsored measure to continue current funding for Community Facilities District No. 5 (RiverPark) and maintain community safety, enhanced police protection, neighborhood/park patrols, keeping public areas clean, safe, wellmaintained, including parks, open space; maintain flood protection, without any increase to the existing maximum tax rate, continuing ongoing public disclosure of spending and annual reports -- be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2436, "no_votes": 786, "total_votes": 3222, "percent_yes": 75.60521415270019, "percent_no": 24.394785847299815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues existing funding for Community Facilities District No", "summary_text": "This measure continues existing funding for Community Facilities District No. 5 (RiverPark) in Oxnard to maintain community safety services, police protection, park patrols, public area maintenance, and flood protection without increasing the current maximum tax rate.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.464496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.008085", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2141, "fingerprint": "2024|202400456|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400456|VENTURA", "content_hash": "9132e31b0b3ef0b4", "measure_id": "202400456", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance to repeal all special taxes specific to RiverPark (Community Facilities District No. 5), eliminating funding for extra police protection services, neighborhood/park patrols within RiverPark, eliminating funding for maintenance of RiverPark parks and open space, sports fields used for youth baseball and soccer, trails, dog parks at enhanced service levels, eliminating funding for landscaping maintenance, flood and storm protection services -- be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2289, "no_votes": 921, "total_votes": 3210, "percent_yes": 71.30841121495327, "percent_no": 28.691588785046733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure repealed all special taxes for Ventura's RiverPark Community Fac...", "summary_text": "This measure repealed all special taxes for Ventura's RiverPark Community Facilities District No. 5, eliminating dedicated funding for enhanced police services, park maintenance, landscaping, recreational facilities, and flood protection services in that area.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.464793", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.008234", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2142, "fingerprint": "2024|202400457|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400457|VENTURA", "content_hash": "3429002a173f5d00", "measure_id": "202400457", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance reducing potential funding by half for RiverPark\u2019s enhanced police protection, patrols within RiverPark, reducing potential funding by half for maintaining RiverPark parks, open space, sports fields for youth baseball/soccer, reducing potential funding by half for landscaping, reducing potential funding by half for flood/storm protection services, by reducing by half the maximum special taxes for Community Facilities District No. 5 (RiverPark) -- be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2115, "no_votes": 1087, "total_votes": 3202, "percent_yes": 66.05246720799501, "percent_no": 33.94753279200499, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reduces by half the maximum special taxes that can be levied for...", "summary_text": "This measure reduces by half the maximum special taxes that can be levied for Community Facilities District No. 5 (RiverPark) in Ventura, which would correspondingly reduce potential funding by half for police protection, parks maintenance, landscaping, and flood/storm protection services in the RiverPark area.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.465072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.008383", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2143, "fingerprint": "2024|202400458|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400458|VENTURA", "content_hash": "5392b5e34af07d7c", "measure_id": "202400458", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance imposing limits on how Community Facilities District No. 5 (RiverPark) (CFD) funding is used \u2013 including limiting police protection services, reducing CFD funding available for flood and storm protection services, prohibiting using CFD funding to maintain sports fields for youth baseball and soccer, and limiting CFD funding for maintenance of parks, parkways and open space to beyond that of \u201cstandard municipal services\u201d \u2013 be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2168, "no_votes": 1032, "total_votes": 3200, "percent_yes": 67.75, "percent_no": 32.25, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Facilities: Parks & Recreation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.465384", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.008547", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2152, "fingerprint": "2024|202400849|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400849|VENTURA", "content_hash": "4b1b329eefb2338e", "measure_id": "202400849", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With no projected increase in current estimated tax rates, shall Santa Paula Unified School District\u2019s measure to construct, upgrade and modernize elementary and middle school classrooms, libraries, cafeterias and restrooms be approved, authorizing $28.4 million of bonds with average levies below $34 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding (approximately $2.1 million annually), legal rates, citizen oversight, audits, full public disclosure of all spending and no funds taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4808, "no_votes": 4444, "total_votes": 9252, "percent_yes": 51.96714223951579, "percent_no": 48.03285776048421, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized Santa Paula Unified School District to issu...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized Santa Paula Unified School District to issue $28.4 million in bonds to construct, upgrade, and modernize elementary and middle school facilities including classrooms, libraries, cafeterias, and restrooms. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of approximately $34 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.606882", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.073212", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2153, "fingerprint": "2024|202400850|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400850|VENTURA", "content_hash": "eb4b134433e5601c", "measure_id": "202400850", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Santa Paula Unified School District\u2019s measure to rebuild and upgrade Bryden Gym; construct performing arts, vocational/ career training facilities and a community pool be adopted, authorizing $36 million of bonds with estimated average levies of $24 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (approximately $2.1 million annually) while outstanding, legal rates, audits, citizen oversight, State matching funds eligibility and full disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5605, "no_votes": 5048, "total_votes": 10653, "percent_yes": 52.61428705528959, "percent_no": 47.38571294471041, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Santa Paula Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Santa Paula Unified School District to issue $36 million in bonds to rebuild Bryden Gym and construct new performing arts facilities, vocational training facilities, and a community pool. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of approximately $24 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.607211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.073376", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2139, "fingerprint": "2024|202400454|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400454|VENTURA", "content_hash": "2cad85bed94e6390", "measure_id": "202400454", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance requiring the four pickleball courts at the Ojai City Hall, 401 South Ventura Street, Ojai California, to be kept open to the public year-round, without any other City permission or permits, and implementing sound mitigation and adverse impacts efforts, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2129, "no_votes": 2106, "total_votes": 4235, "percent_yes": 50.27154663518299, "percent_no": 49.72845336481701, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Facilities: Parks & Recreation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance requires four pickleball courts at Ojai City Hall to remain op...", "summary_text": "This ordinance requires four pickleball courts at Ojai City Hall to remain open to the public year-round without requiring additional city permits, while implementing measures to mitigate sound and other adverse impacts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.464188", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.007937", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2144, "fingerprint": "2024|202400459|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400459|VENTURA", "content_hash": "7ef2b7801b7b975f", "measure_id": "202400459", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Charter be modernized with gender-neutral language and be amended in 16 sections to make various changes, including aligning teleconferencing options, notice of special meetings, the passing of emergency ordinances, and Council compensation with the Government Code, and establishing the duty for Council to consider a charter review commission?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26063, "no_votes": 26881, "total_votes": 52944, "percent_yes": 49.22748564521003, "percent_no": 50.77251435478997, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment would have updated Ventura's city charter with gender-...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment would have updated Ventura's city charter with gender-neutral language and made changes to align teleconferencing, meeting notices, emergency ordinances, and council compensation with state Government Code requirements. It also would have established a duty for the City Council to consider forming a charter review commission.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.465688", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.008714", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2145, "fingerprint": "2024|202400460|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400460|VENTURA", "content_hash": "5f4b1082963f643e", "measure_id": "202400460", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Section 705 (c) of the Charter regarding City Council vacancies be revised to require the Council to appoint a person to fill a vacancy so that the person will serve as a councilmember until the next consolidated election in the County instead of requiring the Council to order a special election to fill a vacancy when the Council fails to fill the vacancy?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30101, "no_votes": 20591, "total_votes": 50692, "percent_yes": 59.38017833188669, "percent_no": 40.61982166811331, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment changes the requirement for filling City Council vacan...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment changes the requirement for filling City Council vacancies from ordering a special election to appointing someone to serve until the next consolidated county election when the Council fails to initially fill the vacancy.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.465956", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.008865", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2146, "fingerprint": "2024|202400461|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400461|VENTURA", "content_hash": "efea15998eee67ff", "measure_id": "202400461", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure funding Santa Paula services such as accelerating repair of streets/potholes; preventing sinkholes; repairing sidewalks; maintaining 911 response; retaining local businesses; cleaning up public areas; maintaining storm drains/clean drinking water sources; offering youth programs; and for general government use by enacting a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $4,500,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, public spending disclosure, all funds benefit Santa Paula residents, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6014, "no_votes": 4004, "total_votes": 10018, "percent_yes": 60.03194250349371, "percent_no": 39.96805749650629, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 1-cent sales tax in Santa Paula to generate approximat...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 1-cent sales tax in Santa Paula to generate approximately $4.5 million annually for municipal services including street repairs, emergency response, infrastructure maintenance, and youth programs. The tax includes requirements for audits and public spending disclosure, and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.466259", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.009013", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2155, "fingerprint": "2024|202400462|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400462|YOLO", "content_hash": "0728b3c5d0d42faf", "measure_id": "202400462", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure authorizing the City of Woodland to accept at least $300,000,000 in federal and state contribution, or up to 99% of the project costs, to provide flood control for the City of Woodland and authorizing construction of the Lower Cache Creek Flood Risk Management Project, as outlined in the measure, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4122, "no_votes": 9752, "total_votes": 13874, "percent_yes": 29.71024938734323, "percent_no": 70.28975061265677, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Flood Control/Drainage", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.466571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.009175", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2161, "fingerprint": "2024|202400852|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400852|YOLO", "content_hash": "319c8eb660c28df9", "measure_id": "202400852", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue outstanding academics in science, technology, engineering, math, reading, writing, arts/ music; attract and retain high quality teachers; support student mental health/ safety; continue athletics, library services, and limit class sizes, shall Davis Joint Unified School District's measure be adopted, renewing the expiring education parcel tax at the current rate of $768/ year, raising approximately $11,700,000 annually until ended by voters, with adjustments for inflation; senior/ disability exemptions; and independent oversight; for the exclusive use of Davis schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14523, "no_votes": 6759, "total_votes": 21282, "percent_yes": 68.24076684522132, "percent_no": 31.759233154778684, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an expiring parcel tax for Davis Joint Unified School Dis...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an expiring parcel tax for Davis Joint Unified School District at $768 per year, raising approximately $11.7 million annually to fund educational programs, teacher retention, student services, and school operations. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and disabled residents, inflation adjustments, and independent oversight, and will continue until ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.607842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.073698", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2158, "fingerprint": "2024|202400465|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400465|YOLO", "content_hash": "9757770d45d15ce6", "measure_id": "202400465", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To rebuild roads and repair potholes, increase police and fire protection, recruit and retain public safety personnel, maintain parks and trails, address homelessness, and keep public spaces safe and clean, shall the City of West Sacramento measure enacting a one cent transactions and use tax (sales tax) providing approximately 20 million dollars annually for general government use, until ended by voters, with all funds locally controlled and subject to independent financial audits and public spending disclosures, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11516, "no_votes": 10072, "total_votes": 21588, "percent_yes": 53.344450620715214, "percent_no": 46.655549379284786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacts a one-cent sales tax in West Sacramento to generate appro...", "summary_text": "This measure enacts a one-cent sales tax in West Sacramento to generate approximately $20 million annually for general government services including road repairs, police and fire protection, parks maintenance, and homelessness programs. The tax continues indefinitely until repealed by voters and includes requirements for financial audits and public spending disclosures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.467505", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.009631", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2163, "fingerprint": "2024|202400854|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400854|YOLO", "content_hash": "e3998fc23a569d90", "measure_id": "202400854", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Woodland Joint Unified School District's measure to remodel/ create Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics classrooms; and replace aging roofs, wiring, heating/ cooling systems be adopted authorizing $160 million of bonds with legal rates, levies averaging below $58 assessed valuation (raising $9 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, annual audits, citizen oversight, full public disclosure of spending and no funds for administrator salaries or benefits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13115, "no_votes": 13541, "total_votes": 26656, "percent_yes": 49.20093037214886, "percent_no": 50.79906962785114, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Woodland Joint Unified School District...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Woodland Joint Unified School District to issue $160 million in bonds to remodel and create STEAM classrooms and replace aging infrastructure including roofs, wiring, and HVAC systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies averaging below $58 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $9 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.608519", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.074003", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2156, "fingerprint": "2024|202400463|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400463|YOLO", "content_hash": "b10c755bfaae6ed5", "measure_id": "202400463", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support essential City services, such as public safety and emergency response; crime prevention; pothole repair; parks, road, sidewalk, and bike path maintenance; and addressing homelessness, affordable housing, and climate change, shall the City of Davis's Ordinance be adopted establishing an additional 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $11,000,000 annually for general government use until repealed by the voters, subject to annual audits, public disclosure of all spending and with all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19402, "no_votes": 10820, "total_votes": 30222, "percent_yes": 64.1982661637218, "percent_no": 35.8017338362782, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established an additional 1-cent sales tax in Davis, California ...", "summary_text": "This measure established an additional 1-cent sales tax in Davis, California to generate approximately $11 million annually for general city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and programs addressing homelessness and climate change. The tax remains in effect until repealed by voters and is subject to annual audits and public spending disclosure requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.466938", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.009323", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2162, "fingerprint": "2024|202400853|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400853|YOLO", "content_hash": "069c1765790cdb3d", "measure_id": "202400853", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure R1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Emily MacDonald be recalled (removed) from office of Area Two Trustee Seat on the Woodland Joint Unified School District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 893, "no_votes": 510, "total_votes": 1403, "percent_yes": 63.64932287954383, "percent_no": 36.35067712045617, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.608223", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.073850", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure R1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2159, "fingerprint": "2024|202400466|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400466|YOLO", "content_hash": "7bdfa0eb607196b8", "measure_id": "202400466", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and improve City services such as 911 emergency response, parks, trails, youth programs; respond to property crimes/thefts/burglaries; retain/attract local businesses; and for general government use; shall the measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $1,200,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, public spending disclosures, funds locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2095, "no_votes": 1377, "total_votes": 3472, "percent_yes": 60.33986175115207, "percent_no": 39.66013824884793, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Yolo, California, expected to ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Yolo, California, expected to generate approximately $1,200,000 annually for city services including 911 emergency response, parks, trails, youth programs, and crime response. The tax continues until ended by voters and includes requirements for audits and public spending disclosures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.467808", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.009782", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2157, "fingerprint": "2024|202400464|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400464|YOLO", "content_hash": "d8764744645c8895", "measure_id": "202400464", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To operate two Davis branch libraries (Mary L. Stephens and the new Walnut Park Library in South Davis) - including hours of operation, maintenance, collections, and community programs and services - shall the measure increasing the annual special library tax by $49 per parcel (multifamily parcels would increase by $24.50 per unit), increasing no more than 2% per year, raising approximately $1,070,875 annually, and continuing until ended by the Board of Supervisors, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25391, "no_votes": 8729, "total_votes": 34120, "percent_yes": 74.41676436107855, "percent_no": 25.58323563892145, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases the annual special library tax by $49 per parcel ($24", "summary_text": "This measure increases the annual special library tax by $49 per parcel ($24.50 per multifamily unit) with up to 2% annual increases to fund operations of two Davis branch libraries, including hours, maintenance, collections, and programs. The tax would raise approximately $1,070,875 annually and continue indefinitely until ended by the Board of Supervisors.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.467206", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.009481", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2160, "fingerprint": "2024|202400467|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400467|YOLO", "content_hash": "67d9c30c2e60e641", "measure_id": "202400467", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To keep Woodland safe, clean and well-maintained by increasing police and fire protection, reducing emergency response times, repairing roads and sidewalks, addressing homelessness, improving and maintaining parks, enhancing programs for children and youth, and for general government use, shall a measure establishing a one cent sales tax, providing approximately $16,500,000 annually for 8 years, requiring independent audits, public spending disclosures, local control and all funds remaining in Woodland, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11514, "no_votes": 13042, "total_votes": 24556, "percent_yes": 46.888744095129496, "percent_no": 53.111255904870504, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.468079", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.009944", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2174, "fingerprint": "2024|202400864|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400864|YUBA", "content_hash": "d2735d5578aa87ff", "measure_id": "202400864", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education at Wheatland High; modernize/ renovate/ construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/ replace leaky roofs; make health, safety, and security improvements; shall the Wheatland Union High School District (SFID No. 2) measure authorizing $9,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating approximately $555,800 annually, at average rates of $28.50 per $100,000 assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1067, "no_votes": 1477, "total_votes": 2544, "percent_yes": 41.941823899371066, "percent_no": 58.058176100628934, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Wheatland Union High School District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Wheatland Union High School District to issue $9 million in bonds to modernize classrooms and facilities, repair roofs, and make health and safety improvements at Wheatland High School. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of approximately $28.50 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.611832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.075651", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2175, "fingerprint": "2024|202400865|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400865|YUBA", "content_hash": "912611e9ae7348b1", "measure_id": "202400865", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue construction on a new high school for Plumas Lake students, shall the Wheatland Union High School District (Plumas Lake SFID No.1) measure authorizing $19,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $1,100,000 annually at average rates of approximately $26.70 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2137, "no_votes": 2689, "total_votes": 4826, "percent_yes": 44.28097803564028, "percent_no": 55.71902196435972, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Wheatland Union High School District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Wheatland Union High School District to issue $19.7 million in bonds to continue construction of a new high school for Plumas Lake students. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $26.70 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.612141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.075840", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2176, "fingerprint": "2024|202400866|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400866|YUBA", "content_hash": "49d4b362b1bbbad7", "measure_id": "202400866", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct classrooms, restrooms and other necessary high school facilities, shall the Wheatland Union High School District (Plumas Lake SFID No.1) measure authorizing $20,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $1,200,000 annually at average rates of approximately $27.25 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1923, "no_votes": 2866, "total_votes": 4789, "percent_yes": 40.154520776780124, "percent_no": 59.845479223219876, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.612443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.076018", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2171, "fingerprint": "2024|202400861|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400861|YUBA", "content_hash": "9d6b942bbfbd25f2", "measure_id": "202400861", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To insure safe facilities and quality education for District students and qualify for State matching funds by constructing and equipping core curriculum classrooms, bathrooms and other essential school facilities, shall Plumas Lake Elementary School District\u2019s measure issuing $18,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, by levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value (raising $970,000 annually while bonds are outstanding) be approved, with independent oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2063, "no_votes": 2702, "total_votes": 4765, "percent_yes": 43.29485834207765, "percent_no": 56.70514165792235, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Plumas Lake Elementary School District...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Plumas Lake Elementary School District to issue $18 million in bonds to construct and equip classrooms, bathrooms, and other school facilities, funded by a property tax of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. The bonds would have included independent oversight and annual audits, with funds designated solely for local district use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.610858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.075156", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2172, "fingerprint": "2024|202400862|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400862|YUBA", "content_hash": "a6c1190de2313b3b", "measure_id": "202400862", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To insure quality education for District students and qualify for State matching funds by constructing and equipping facilities for science, technology, engineering, art, and math (STEAM) classrooms and labs, shall Plumas Lake Elementary School District\u2019s measure issuing $18,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, by levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value (raising $970,000 annually while bonds are outstanding) be approved, with independent oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2117, "no_votes": 2672, "total_votes": 4789, "percent_yes": 44.20547087074546, "percent_no": 55.79452912925454, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.611158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.075323", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2173, "fingerprint": "2024|202400863|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400863|YUBA", "content_hash": "833c03b4cc643e6d", "measure_id": "202400863", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To insure safe facilities and quality education for District students and qualify for State matching funds by constructing, equipping required physical education facilities including a gymnasium, athletic fields and playgrounds, shall Plumas Lake Elementary School District\u2019s measure issuing $18,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, by levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value (raising $970,000 annually while bonds are outstanding) be approved, with independent oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2109, "no_votes": 2692, "total_votes": 4801, "percent_yes": 43.928348260779, "percent_no": 56.071651739221, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Plumas Lake Elementary School District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Plumas Lake Elementary School District to issue $18 million in bonds to construct and equip physical education facilities including a gymnasium, athletic fields, and playgrounds. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising about $970,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.611500", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.075487", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2164, "fingerprint": "2024|202400468|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400468|YUBA", "content_hash": "5a26722dd38b2bd5", "measure_id": "202400468", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, without raising taxes, to protect and maintain City of Marysville's services, including Police and Fire Departments, neighborhood police patrols, 911 emergency response times, street repaving and pothole repairs, emergency preparedness and for general government use, to continue an existing voter-approved one-cent sales tax, until ended by voters, providing an estimated $3.9 million a year, with independent audits, an oversight committee and all money locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2765, "no_votes": 921, "total_votes": 3686, "percent_yes": 75.01356483993489, "percent_no": 24.986435160065113, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure continues an existing one-cent sales tax in Marysville to fund ci...", "summary_text": "The measure continues an existing one-cent sales tax in Marysville to fund city services including police, fire, emergency response, street maintenance, and general government operations, generating an estimated $3.9 million annually. The tax would remain in effect until ended by voters and includes provisions for independent audits and oversight committee monitoring.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-11-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.468371", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.010094", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2165, "fingerprint": "2024|202400855|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400855|YUBA", "content_hash": "4961a404626db414", "measure_id": "202400855", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct a new middle school to reduce student overcrowding, replace temporary portables, upgrade P.E. and arts facilities, renovate/repair classrooms, restrooms and roofs, and improve school safety, shall the Marysville Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $97,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, and levying approximately $49 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $5.8 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for administrator salaries and all money spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3835, "no_votes": 6414, "total_votes": 10249, "percent_yes": 37.41828471070348, "percent_no": 62.58171528929652, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Marysville Joint Unified School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Marysville Joint Unified School District to issue $97 million in bonds to construct a new middle school, replace portable classrooms, upgrade facilities, and make various school improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $49 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.608847", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.074156", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2169, "fingerprint": "2024|202400859|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400859|YUBA", "content_hash": "8ba608b9c79becc5", "measure_id": "202400859", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue construction on a new high school for Plumas Lake students, construct classrooms, restrooms and other necessary high school facilities; shall the Wheatland Union High School District (Plumas Lake SFID No.1) measure authorizing $20,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $1,100,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1409, "no_votes": 1169, "total_votes": 2578, "percent_yes": 54.65477114041894, "percent_no": 45.34522885958106, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Wheatland Union High School District to...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Wheatland Union High School District to issue $20 million in bonds to continue construction of a new high school for Plumas Lake students and build additional classrooms, restrooms, and other facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating about $1.1 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.610167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.074823", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2170, "fingerprint": "2024|202400860|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400860|YUBA", "content_hash": "20cc95c43d9aeb6a", "measure_id": "202400860", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education at Wheatland High; modernize/renovate/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; make health, safety, and security improvements; shall the Wheatland Union High School District (SFID No. 2) measure authorizing $8,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $535,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $28 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 534, "no_votes": 722, "total_votes": 1256, "percent_yes": 42.51592356687898, "percent_no": 57.48407643312102, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Wheatland Union High School District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Wheatland Union High School District to issue $8,700,000 in bonds to modernize classrooms, repair facilities, upgrade roofs, and make health and safety improvements at Wheatland High School. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $28 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.610507", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.074988", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2166, "fingerprint": "2024|202400856|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400856|YUBA", "content_hash": "9d541b17184a42ac", "measure_id": "202400856", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain safe facilities and quality education for District students and qualify for State matching funds by upgrading, constructing and equipping core curriculum classrooms, bathrooms and other essential school facilities, shall the Plumas Lake Elementary School District issue $18,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, by levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value (raising $970,000 each year while bonds are outstanding) and with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying in Plumas Lake?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1392, "no_votes": 1193, "total_votes": 2585, "percent_yes": 53.84912959381044, "percent_no": 46.15087040618956, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Plumas Lake Elementary School District ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Plumas Lake Elementary School District to issue $18 million in bonds to upgrade, construct, and equip classrooms, bathrooms, and other school facilities, funded by a property tax levy of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. The bonds would have included independent oversight, annual audits, and a requirement that all funds remain within the district.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.609161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.074325", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2167, "fingerprint": "2024|202400857|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400857|YUBA", "content_hash": "f6f76a4c6f853f1a", "measure_id": "202400857", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain safe facilities and quality education for District students and qualify for State matching funds by upgrading, constructing and equipping facilities for science, technology, engineering, art, and math (STEAM) classrooms and labs, shall the Plumas Lake Elementary School District issue $18,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, by levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value (raising $970,000 each year while bonds are outstanding) and with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying in Plumas Lake?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1398, "no_votes": 1184, "total_votes": 2582, "percent_yes": 54.144074360960495, "percent_no": 45.855925639039505, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Plumas Lake Elementary School District ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Plumas Lake Elementary School District to issue $18 million in bonds to upgrade, construct, and equip STEAM (science, technology, engineering, art, and math) classroom facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.609519", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.074489", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2168, "fingerprint": "2024|202400858|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2024|202400858|YUBA", "content_hash": "6e65eb2cc9a774d5", "measure_id": "202400858", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2024, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain safe facilities and quality education for District students and qualify for State matching funds by upgrading, constructing and equipping physical education facilities including a gymnasium, athletic fields and playgrounds, shall the Plumas Lake Elementary School District issue $18,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, by levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value (raising $970,000 each year while bonds are outstanding) and with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying in Plumas Lake?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1365, "no_votes": 1202, "total_votes": 2567, "percent_yes": 53.17491234904558, "percent_no": 46.82508765095442, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Plumas Lake Elementary School District...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Plumas Lake Elementary School District to issue $18 million in bonds to upgrade, construct, and equip physical education facilities including a gymnasium, athletic fields, and playgrounds. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising about $970,000 annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2024-03-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.609862", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:57.074655", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2177, "fingerprint": "2023|202300026|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300026|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "348520579dcb6232", "measure_id": "202300026", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support Orinda students and maintain high quality elementary/ intermediate schools, shall Orinda Union School District\u2019s measure to maintain core academic instruction in science, technology, engineering, math, arts, music, reading and writing programs; attract and retain highly qualified teachers, specialists and staff; and preserve small class sizes by levying $295 per parcel for seven years be adopted, providing $2,200,000 annually, with senior exemptions, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5018, "no_votes": 1545, "total_votes": 6563, "percent_yes": 76.45893646198385, "percent_no": 23.541063538016147, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Orinda Union School District to levy a $295 annua...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Orinda Union School District to levy a $295 annual parcel tax for seven years to generate approximately $2.2 million annually for maintaining academic programs, retaining qualified staff, and preserving small class sizes. The measure includes senior exemptions, citizen oversight, and restrictions on using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-03-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.299965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.824669", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2178, "fingerprint": "2023|202300001|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300001|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "1d2ff113c964cc04", "measure_id": "202300001", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $850.00 on each parcel of land within the Rolling Ranch Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2023/2024 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance and generating an annual revenue of approximately $18,700.00, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28, "no_votes": 10, "total_votes": 38, "percent_yes": 73.68421052631578, "percent_no": 26.31578947368422, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure levies an annual special tax of $850 on each parcel of land withi...", "summary_text": "The measure levies an annual special tax of $850 on each parcel of land within the Rolling Ranch Zone of Benefit to fund road improvements and maintenance, generating approximately $18,700 annually. The tax commenced in fiscal year 2023/2024 and continues for an unlimited duration.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-07-11", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.300480", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.824872", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2179, "fingerprint": "2023|202300002|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300002|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "4eafff02eb69463e", "measure_id": "202300002", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to increase the annual special tax from $200.00 to $400.00 on each parcel of land within the Pilot View Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2024/2025 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance and generating an annual revenue of approximately $28,800.00, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19, "no_votes": 22, "total_votes": 41, "percent_yes": 46.34146341463415, "percent_no": 53.65853658536585, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have doubled the annual special tax from $200 to $400 per ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have doubled the annual special tax from $200 to $400 per parcel within the Pilot View Zone of Benefit in El Dorado County, with funds used exclusively for road improvements and maintenance. The tax increase would have generated approximately $28,800 annually starting in fiscal year 2024/2025 and continued indefinitely.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-11-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.300940", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.825037", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2180, "fingerprint": "2023|202300003|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300003|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "64893c6aa8ea2aae", "measure_id": "202300003", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to increase the annual special tax from $450.00 to $750.00 on each parcel of land within the Pineoakio Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2024/2025 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance and generating an annual revenue of approximately $20,250.00, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 16, "percent_yes": 81.25, "percent_no": 18.75, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the annual special tax on land parcels within the Pine...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the annual special tax on land parcels within the Pineoakio Zone of Benefit from $450 to $750, generating approximately $20,250 annually for road improvements and maintenance starting in fiscal year 2024/2025. The tax increase has no expiration date and continues indefinitely.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-11-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.301415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.825197", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2181, "fingerprint": "2023|202300008|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300008|FRESNO", "content_hash": "4d1f413ea2c78b6a", "measure_id": "202300008", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue generating approximately $263,965 annually to fund police and fire services where 80% of the special tax proceeds shall be used for police services and 20% shall be used for fire services, shall the measure levying $95/parcel for single-family homes and specified amounts for multifamily, commercial, agricultural, and industrial parcels, known as Measure \"O\", be adopted without expiration, with all funds generated staying in the City of Orange Cove?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 239, "no_votes": 133, "total_votes": 372, "percent_yes": 64.24731182795699, "percent_no": 35.75268817204301, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a permanent special tax on property parce...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a permanent special tax on property parcels in Orange Cove to generate approximately $263,965 annually for police and fire services, with 80% allocated to police and 20% to fire services. The tax would have charged $95 per single-family home parcel and specified amounts for other property types.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-11-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.301846", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.825360", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2182, "fingerprint": "2023|202300009|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300009|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5057a04645086341", "measure_id": "202300009", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Catherine Alvarez be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember, Council District 3 of the City of Downey?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3381, "no_votes": 374, "total_votes": 3755, "percent_yes": 90.03994673768308, "percent_no": 9.960053262316919, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Catherine Alvarez from her...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Catherine Alvarez from her position as City Councilmember for District 3 in the City of Downey. The measure passed, resulting in her removal from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-01-31", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.302338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.825524", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2187, "fingerprint": "2023|202300018|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300018|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fd122520f3d1db9e", "measure_id": "202300018", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 22-O-2866 adopted by the City Council and enacting zone changes and corresponding map amendments to permit the Cheval BlancHotel which will contain up to 115 rooms, a 500 member private club, and restaurant and retail uses on an approximately 1.28 acre site in the northern portion of the business triangle, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3511, "no_votes": 3591, "total_votes": 7102, "percent_yes": 49.436778372289496, "percent_no": 50.563221627710504, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would have enacted zone changes to permit construction of the ...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would have enacted zone changes to permit construction of the Cheval Blanc Hotel with up to 115 rooms, a 500-member private club, and restaurant and retail uses on a 1.28-acre site in Los Angeles's business triangle area.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-05-23", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.306456", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.826968", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2188, "fingerprint": "2023|202300019|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300019|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3afda8263be5e84b", "measure_id": "202300019", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 22-O-2867 adopted by the Beverly Hills City Council approving a development agreement which vests development rights for the Cheval Blanc Hotel in exchange for public benefits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3513, "no_votes": 3594, "total_votes": 7107, "percent_yes": 49.4301392992824, "percent_no": 50.5698607007176, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have ratified a development agreement between Beverly Hills...", "summary_text": "The measure would have ratified a development agreement between Beverly Hills and a developer that grants vested development rights for the Cheval Blanc Hotel project in exchange for specified public benefits. The ordinance was previously adopted by the Beverly Hills City Council but required voter approval to take effect.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-05-23", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.306901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.827126", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2183, "fingerprint": "2023|202300010|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300010|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f3e58e8e2b66c588", "measure_id": "202300010", "measure_letter": "CA1", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Sections 19, 19.1, 19.7 and 19.9, for public works contracts; competitive bidding, when not required; progress payments; municipal purchases be amended to increase dollar thresholds; authorize, by ordinance, future revisions adopted by 4/5 vote by no more than 25%, and no less than 5 years between amendments; to define maintenance and repairs by ordinance or resolution; to decrease progress payments from 10% to 5%; and further defining municipal purchases?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6996, "no_votes": 2497, "total_votes": 9493, "percent_yes": 73.69640787949015, "percent_no": 26.303592120509848, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This Los Angeles charter amendment increases dollar thresholds for public wor...", "summary_text": "This Los Angeles charter amendment increases dollar thresholds for public works contracts and competitive bidding requirements, while allowing future threshold adjustments of up to 25% through ordinance with a 4/5 council vote every five years. It also reduces required progress payment retention from 10% to 5% and authorizes the city to better define maintenance, repairs, and municipal purchases through ordinance or resolution.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-03-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.302809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.825682", "update_count": 8, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11028, "fingerprint": "2023|202300011|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300011|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e9bc4a8ec1748c75", "measure_id": "202300011", "measure_letter": "CA2", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Section 20.1, Approval of Demands be amended to remove \u201csupplies, materials, property or services for which payment is claimed, have been actually delivered or rendered\u201d and replace with \u201camount is legally due\u201d, thereby permitting the City to pay deposits on purchases?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7550, "no_votes": 2104, "total_votes": 9654, "percent_yes": 78.2059250051792, "percent_no": 21.794074994820804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment changed the language in Section 20", "summary_text": "This charter amendment changed the language in Section 20.1 to allow the City of Los Angeles to pay deposits on purchases by replacing the requirement that supplies or services must be \"actually delivered or rendered\" with allowing payment when \"amount is legally due.\"", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-03-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.206596", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.303297", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.825841", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11029, "fingerprint": "2023|202300012|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300012|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ce3140a116adb4c8", "measure_id": "202300012", "measure_letter": "CA3", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA3", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Charter of the City of Redondo Beach be amended to use gender neutral language throughout the Charter?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6753, "no_votes": 3327, "total_votes": 10080, "percent_yes": 66.99404761904762, "percent_no": 33.00595238095238, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment changed the language in the City of Redondo Beach's ch...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment changed the language in the City of Redondo Beach's charter to use gender-neutral terms throughout the document. The measure updated pronouns and other gendered language to be inclusive of all genders.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-03-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.206782", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.303775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.826014", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA3", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11030, "fingerprint": "2023|202300013|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300013|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "972e29a848019837", "measure_id": "202300013", "measure_letter": "CA4", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA4", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Section 8.3(c) of the Charter of the City of Redondo Beach be amended to provide an exception to the current requirement that the Mayor sign all contracts, permitting the City Manager, other officer or employee to approve and sign a written contract on behalf of the City when authorized to do so by the City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7155, "no_votes": 2734, "total_votes": 9889, "percent_yes": 72.35311962786935, "percent_no": 27.646880372130653, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment allows the City Manager or other designated city emplo...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment allows the City Manager or other designated city employees to sign contracts on behalf of Redondo Beach when authorized by the City Council, creating an exception to the existing requirement that only the Mayor sign all contracts.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-03-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.206968", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.304208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.826172", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA4", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11031, "fingerprint": "2023|202300014|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300014|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "abc4f05467e7b025", "measure_id": "202300014", "measure_letter": "CA5", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA5", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Section 18.4 of the Charter of the City of Redondo be amended to eliminate runoff elections for elective offices of the City and to require the City Council to adopt an ordinance implementing an instant runoff voting system for elective offices of the City instead?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7623, "no_votes": 2319, "total_votes": 9942, "percent_yes": 76.67471333735666, "percent_no": 23.325286662643336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure eliminates runoff elections for Redondo Beach city offices and r...", "summary_text": "This measure eliminates runoff elections for Redondo Beach city offices and requires the City Council to adopt an ordinance implementing an instant runoff voting system instead.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-03-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.207154", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.304638", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.826330", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA5", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2184, "fingerprint": "2023|202300015|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300015|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fcb04baf809c29c6", "measure_id": "202300015", "measure_letter": "CT", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CT", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City tax cannabis or hemp businesses at annual rates ranging from 3% to 9% of gross receipts on retail establishments, and rates from 1% to 3% of gross receipts on cultivation, distribution, manufacturing and testing labs, which is expected to generate an estimated $300,000 to $900,000 annually, with the tax being levied until repealed by the voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7981, "no_votes": 2491, "total_votes": 10472, "percent_yes": 76.21275783040488, "percent_no": 23.787242169595118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Revenue", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Los Angeles to tax cannabis and hemp businesses at an...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Los Angeles to tax cannabis and hemp businesses at annual rates of 3-9% of gross receipts for retail establishments and 1-3% for cultivation, distribution, manufacturing and testing facilities. The tax is expected to generate $300,000 to $900,000 annually and will remain in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-03-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.305071", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.826494", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CT", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2186, "fingerprint": "2023|202300017|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300017|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "16fdfd284f122f91", "measure_id": "202300017", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall City Council Ordinance No. 1461 approving a zoning map amendment, a specific plan, and a development agreement for The Meadows at Bailey Canyon project located at 700 North Sunnyside Avenue in Sierra Madre be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2252, "no_votes": 1882, "total_votes": 4134, "percent_yes": 54.47508466376391, "percent_no": 45.52491533623609, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure approves a zoning map amendment, specific plan, and development a...", "summary_text": "The measure approves a zoning map amendment, specific plan, and development agreement for The Meadows at Bailey Canyon project located at 700 North Sunnyside Avenue in Sierra Madre.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-05-09", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.306018", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.826809", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2189, "fingerprint": "2023|202300027|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300027|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ed776fcb5421ce92", "measure_id": "202300027", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue local funding to attract and retain highly qualified teachers, support advanced programs in math, science, reading, writing, engineering, technology, music and arts, and maintain manageable class sizes, shall South Pasadena Unified School District's measure renewing the current expiring school parcel tax for 7 years at the rate of $474 per parcel be adopted, with annual inflation adjustments, senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and continuing $3,000,000 in annual school funding that cannot be taken away by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3711, "no_votes": 781, "total_votes": 4492, "percent_yes": 82.61353517364202, "percent_no": 17.38646482635798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews South Pasadena Unified School District's existing parcel ...", "summary_text": "This measure renews South Pasadena Unified School District's existing parcel tax for 7 years at $474 per parcel with annual inflation adjustments, providing $3 million annually for teacher retention, advanced academic programs, and smaller class sizes. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and independent oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-05-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.307385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.827284", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2185, "fingerprint": "2023|202300016|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300016|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3621a40e640e04de", "measure_id": "202300016", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure extending the Public Safety Special Parcel Tax, authorizing, for a period of five years, the levy of an annual special parcel tax on non-residential parcels at the rate of $0.03683 per square foot (adjusted annually for inflation), and generating approximately $2,180,000 annually for 5 years, to maintain and improve City services and projects including City police protection services, City health services, and contracted City fire protection services, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50, "no_votes": 18, "total_votes": 68, "percent_yes": 73.52941176470588, "percent_no": 26.470588235294116, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Los Angeles's Public Safety Special Parcel Tax for five ...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Los Angeles's Public Safety Special Parcel Tax for five years, levying an annual tax of $0.03683 per square foot on non-residential parcels (adjusted for inflation) to generate approximately $2.18 million annually. The revenue would fund city police protection services, health services, and contracted fire protection services.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-04-11", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.305539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.826651", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2190, "fingerprint": "2023|202300028|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300028|MARIN", "content_hash": "23aaecde38c31eeb", "measure_id": "202300028", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect quality education without increasing tax rates by renewing expiring local funding that cannot be taken by the State; maintain quality core academic instruction in math, science, reading/writing; protect funding for teachers; and preserve music/art programs, shall Novato Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted renewing the existing $251 parcel tax at the current rate, providing $4,000,000 annually for 8 years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight, no funds for administration and all funding for Novato students?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12225, "no_votes": 2451, "total_votes": 14676, "percent_yes": 83.29926410466068, "percent_no": 16.70073589533932, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an existing $251 annual parcel tax for the Novato Unified...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an existing $251 annual parcel tax for the Novato Unified School District for 8 years, generating approximately $4 million annually to fund core academic programs, teachers, and music/art programs. The measure includes senior exemptions and prohibits use of funds for administration.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-03-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.307878", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.827442", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2191, "fingerprint": "2023|202300020|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300020|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "81e63a07fe201066", "measure_id": "202300020", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MENDOCINO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Fort Bragg's special purpose transactions and use tax (streets sales tax) for the maintenance, repair and reconstruction of the City's streets, which is currently scheduled to expire on December 31, 2024, be extended, until repealed by the voters, at the current one half of one percent rate, generating approximately $1,352,000 in revenues annually that can be used by the City exclusively to maintain, repair, and reconstruct the City's streets?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1021, "no_votes": 239, "total_votes": 1260, "percent_yes": 81.03174603174604, "percent_no": 18.96825396825396, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure extends Fort Bragg's existing 0", "summary_text": "The measure extends Fort Bragg's existing 0.5% sales tax for street maintenance, repair, and reconstruction indefinitely until voters repeal it, rather than allowing it to expire on December 31, 2024. The tax is expected to generate approximately $1.35 million annually for exclusive use on city street improvements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-11-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.308325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.827646", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MENDOCINO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2193, "fingerprint": "2023|202300029|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300029|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7ba7c821d3ff6adf", "measure_id": "202300029", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct a new track and shade structures, replace portable classrooms and other outdated infrastructure; acquire and improve school facilities; and improve the quality of education; shall San Lucas Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted to issue $3,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, estimated levies of approximately 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, generating on average $240,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual reports, no money for salaries and all money improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 40, "percent_yes": 85.0, "percent_no": 15.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Bonds", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Lucas Union School District to issue $3", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Lucas Union School District to issue $3.6 million in bonds to construct new facilities including a track and shade structures, replace portable classrooms, and acquire and improve school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $240,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-05-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.309285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.828013", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2192, "fingerprint": "2023|202300004|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300004|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "bb57bc11e37bf926", "measure_id": "202300004", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a special tax to fund Fire/EMS Services be levied annually until repealed at a rate of up to $954.67 per year for developed and undeveloped estate residential parcels with rates for other parcels shown in Resolution No. 23-05, initially generating $389,840.00 ($294,791.40 from residential and $95,048.60 from non-residential) with maximum rates subject to a 4% annual inflation adjustment and establishing an appropriations limit of $900,000 for Community Facilities District No. 1 (Fire/EMS) of the Santa Lucia Community Services District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 77, "percent_yes": 84.4155844155844, "percent_no": 15.584415584415595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a special tax to fund Fire/EMS services in Santa Luc...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a special tax to fund Fire/EMS services in Santa Lucia Community Services District, with annual rates up to $954.67 for residential parcels and other rates specified in Resolution No. 23-05, initially generating approximately $389,840. The tax rates are subject to annual inflation adjustments up to 4% and establish a $900,000 appropriations limit for the community facilities district.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-08-29", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.308791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.827831", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2194, "fingerprint": "2023|202300021|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300021|NAPA", "content_hash": "7a9e0efe79d7e050", "measure_id": "202300021", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure enabling the City of Calistoga to acquire, control and maintain the Napa County Fairgrounds for public use and benefit by levying a maximum annual special tax of $0.32/building square foot (single-family/condo), $1.42/building square foot (lodging), plus other rates for commercial/industrial, rural, undeveloped, multi-family, mobile home, and ADU properties, increasing 2% annually thereafter, generating approximately $4,000,000 per year initially, and authorizing bonds/appropriations limit up to $27,500,000 with the bond authorization expiring in 37 years, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 459, "no_votes": 896, "total_votes": 1355, "percent_yes": 33.874538745387454, "percent_no": 66.12546125461255, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the City of Calistoga to levy a special ta...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the City of Calistoga to levy a special tax on properties at varying rates based on property type to fund the acquisition and maintenance of the Napa County Fairgrounds for public use. The tax would have generated approximately $4 million annually and authorized up to $27.5 million in bonds, with the tax rates increasing 2% per year.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-03-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.309727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.828211", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2196, "fingerprint": "2023|202300023|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300023|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a6c30ef4b11e26b5", "measure_id": "202300023", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Jessie Lopez be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember for Ward 3, City of Santa Ana?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2993, "no_votes": 3867, "total_votes": 6860, "percent_yes": 43.629737609329446, "percent_no": 56.370262390670554, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-11-14", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.310707", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.828603", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2195, "fingerprint": "2023|202300022|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300022|ORANGE", "content_hash": "907a5bb8b11496b3", "measure_id": "202300022", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase, within 10 days after voter approval is declared, the hourly minimum wage payable to hotel and event center workers to $25, and with a 3% minimum annual increase beginning in 2026, to afford temporary retention rights to such workers, and to require safety measures and workload restrictions for hotel workers?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11809, "no_votes": 23210, "total_votes": 35019, "percent_yes": 33.721693937576745, "percent_no": 66.27830606242325, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would have immediately increased the minimum wage for hotel an...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would have immediately increased the minimum wage for hotel and event center workers in Orange to $25 per hour with annual 3% increases starting in 2026, while also providing temporary job retention rights and requiring safety measures and workload limits for hotel workers.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-10-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.310345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.828409", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2197, "fingerprint": "2023|202300005|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300005|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "8e2be723567c7b4b", "measure_id": "202300005", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLUMAS Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain local fire protection and emergency medical response services for properties within the Plumas Eureka Community Services District, so that victims of heart attack, stroke, car accidents and other medical emergencies can receive rapid response care, and to keep property insurance rates manageable, do you support an annual special property tax with all revenue staying in our community, for local fire protection and emergency medical response services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 106, "no_votes": 28, "total_votes": 134, "percent_yes": 79.1044776119403, "percent_no": 20.895522388059703, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established an annual special property tax within the Plumas Eur...", "summary_text": "This measure established an annual special property tax within the Plumas Eureka Community Services District to fund local fire protection and emergency medical response services. The tax revenue is designated to remain within the local community for these specific public safety services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-11-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.310986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.828787", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLUMAS Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2198, "fingerprint": "2023|202300024|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300024|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "451b117fc1bac817", "measure_id": "202300024", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, establishing, for 30 years, an annual special business license tax of up to $0.107 per square foot (subject to annual CPI adjustments) on distribution facilities, large truck storage businesses, and manufacturing businesses with large truck activity, annually collecting approximately $4,019,315 to be used solely for construction, improvement, operation, maintenance, repair and/or restoration of Perris public streets, roadways, sidewalks, roadway lighting, storm drains, traffic signals or other public improvements, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1609, "no_votes": 1476, "total_votes": 3085, "percent_yes": 52.15559157212317, "percent_no": 47.84440842787683, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 30-year annual business license tax of ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 30-year annual business license tax of up to $0.107 per square foot on distribution facilities, large truck storage businesses, and manufacturing businesses with significant truck activity in Perris, California. The tax, subject to annual cost-of-living adjustments, was estimated to generate approximately $4 million annually for construction, improvement, operation, maintenance, and repair of public streets, roadways, sidewalks, lighting, storm drains, traffic signals, and other public infrastructure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-11-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.311292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.828981", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2199, "fingerprint": "2023|202300030|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300030|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "53c5fda8cc43d230", "measure_id": "202300030", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support students with funds that cannot be taken by the State, to maintain 21st century, hands-on science labs, technology, engineering/math instruction, strengthen reading/writing programs, attract/ retain qualified teachers; restore art, and, maintain music programs, shall the Millbrae Elementary School District measure be adopted renewing the current $97 levy and a.dding $28 per parcel, raising $925,000 annually for 9 years, exempting seniors, requiring independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3099, "no_votes": 1276, "total_votes": 4375, "percent_yes": 70.83428571428571, "percent_no": 29.165714285714287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews and increases a parcel tax for the Millbrae Elementary Sc...", "summary_text": "This measure renews and increases a parcel tax for the Millbrae Elementary School District, raising the levy from $97 to $125 per parcel to generate $925,000 annually for nine years to fund science labs, technology instruction, reading/writing programs, teacher retention, and arts/music programs. The measure includes exemptions for seniors, prohibits use of funds for administrator salaries, and requires independent citizen oversight.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-05-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.311595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.829169", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2200, "fingerprint": "2023|202300031|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300031|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "806052d6a0d413dd", "measure_id": "202300031", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers, protect core academic programs in reading, writing, science, technology, engineering, arts, and math, and maintain high-quality neighborhood elementary and junior high schools; shall Los Altos School District's measure be adopted, renewing expiring local funding at the current $223 rate plus $72, per parcel, providing $3.7 million annually for 8 years that cannot be taken by the State, with senior exemptions, annual adjustments, independent oversight, and no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8167, "no_votes": 2749, "total_votes": 10916, "percent_yes": 74.81678270428729, "percent_no": 25.18321729571271, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed and increased a local parcel tax for Los Altos School Di...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed and increased a local parcel tax for Los Altos School District from $223 to $295 per parcel annually for 8 years, generating $3.7 million per year for teacher retention, academic programs, and school maintenance. The tax includes exemptions for seniors, annual adjustments, independent oversight, and restrictions preventing funds from being used for administrator salaries or taken by the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-11-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.311889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.829363", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2201, "fingerprint": "2023|202300032|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300032|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "3964779ece6a8a88", "measure_id": "202300032", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers and staff, strengthen programs in math, science, technology, arts, and reading, and maintain counselors and mental health services, shall the Scotts Valley Unified School District measure renewing the expiring school parcel tax be adopted at the rate of $168 per parcel for seven years, generating nearly $IM annually of 100% locally controlled Scotts Valley school funding, with senior and disability exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and no administrative salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3246, "no_votes": 1227, "total_votes": 4473, "percent_yes": 72.56874580818243, "percent_no": 27.431254191817573, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an expiring parcel tax for the Scotts Valley Unified Scho...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an expiring parcel tax for the Scotts Valley Unified School District at $168 per parcel for seven years to fund teacher retention, educational programs, and student services. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and disabled residents and generates approximately $1 million annually in local school funding.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-10-24", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.312217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.829557", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2202, "fingerprint": "2023|202300006|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300006|SHASTA", "content_hash": "9c6c57b3b882728d", "measure_id": "202300006", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Measure A (Formation of Shasta Fire Protection District) be adopted? This measure establishes a new fire protection district identified as the Shasta Fire Protection District. The new district will provide fire protection services and related services within the district\u2019s boundaries.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 372, "no_votes": 33, "total_votes": 405, "percent_yes": 91.85185185185185, "percent_no": 8.148148148148152, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a new fire protection district called the Shasta Fir...", "summary_text": "This measure established a new fire protection district called the Shasta Fire Protection District to provide fire protection and related services within its designated boundaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-11-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.312510", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.829748", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2203, "fingerprint": "2023|202300007|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300007|SHASTA", "content_hash": "4ea4e6c3eb993b06", "measure_id": "202300007", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Measure B (Special Tax Measure) be adopted? To staff the Shasta fire station with 2 fulltime Firefighters/EMTs and 2 seasonal firefighters, shall an annual special parcel tax of $20 be charged to each taxable parcel within the proposed Shasta Fire Protection District, subject to 2% annual cost of living adjustments, generating $26,000 annually for the proposed District until ended by voters; and if the proposed District is not formed, this revenue may be used by the Shasta County Fire Department?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 364, "no_votes": 40, "total_votes": 404, "percent_yes": 90.0990099009901, "percent_no": 9.900990099009903, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a $20 annual parcel tax to fund staffing of the Shas...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a $20 annual parcel tax to fund staffing of the Shasta fire station with 2 full-time firefighters/EMTs and 2 seasonal firefighters, generating $26,000 annually for either a proposed Shasta Fire Protection District or the Shasta County Fire Department if the district is not formed. The tax includes 2% annual cost of living adjustments and continues until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-11-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.312788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.829953", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2204, "fingerprint": "2023|202300025|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2023|202300025|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "485c18ca073c0f12", "measure_id": "202300025", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2023, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SISKIYOU Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding (all funds used locally) for infrastructure and general City services, including, but not limited to, fire protection, law enforcement, rescue, emergency response and preparedness, and maintaining facilities and equipment, shall the City increase the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) rate from 10% to 12% on July 1, 2024, with an estimated increase of $245,000 generated annually from the resulting tax and will remain in effect until repealed or amended?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 684, "no_votes": 121, "total_votes": 805, "percent_yes": 84.96894409937889, "percent_no": 15.031055900621112, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Taxes", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Siskiyou's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 10...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Siskiyou's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 10% to 12% effective July 1, 2024, to fund local infrastructure and city services including fire protection, law enforcement, emergency response, and facility maintenance. The tax increase is estimated to generate an additional $245,000 annually and remains in effect until repealed or amended.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2023-11-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.313060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.830144", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SISKIYOU Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2214, "fingerprint": "2022|202200421|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200421|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "011d1abd127b8392", "measure_id": "202200421", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renew expiring local school funding without increasing taxes; preserve quality academics in math, science, reading, writing, engineering and technology; attract and retain qualified teachers; preserve TK-12 technology and elementary science specialists; keep classroom technology and curriculum up-to-date, shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District's measure be adopted extending the existing $138 parcel tax for seven years, providing approximately $4,000,000 annually that cannot be taken by the State, with senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and all funds benefitting Livermore students?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11298, "no_votes": 5488, "total_votes": 16786, "percent_yes": 67.30608840700583, "percent_no": 32.69391159299417, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing $138 annual parcel tax in the Livermore Vall...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing $138 annual parcel tax in the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District for seven years, generating approximately $4 million annually for local school programs including academics, technology, and teacher retention. The measure maintained the current tax rate without increasing it and included exemptions for seniors and independent oversight requirements.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-05-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.092872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.670103", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2216, "fingerprint": "2022|202200095|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200095|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "47ee01ee4dbff568", "measure_id": "202200095", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure continuing funding to keep Oakland neighborhood libraries open and for library services, including services to unhoused populations and youth and senior programs, by renewing the tax for 30 years commencing at the current rate of $114.50 per single family parcel, and specified rates for other parcel types, providing approximately $18,000,000 in the first year, with audits, citizens\u00b7 oversight, and specified exemptions for low-income populations and affordable housing, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65362, "no_votes": 14000, "total_votes": 79362, "percent_yes": 82.35931554144301, "percent_no": 17.64068445855699, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews a property tax for 30 years to fund Oakland neighborhood ...", "summary_text": "This measure renews a property tax for 30 years to fund Oakland neighborhood libraries and library services, including programs for unhoused populations, youth, and seniors, at a rate of $114.50 per single family parcel with specified rates for other property types. The tax would generate approximately $18 million in the first year and includes provisions for audits, citizen oversight, and exemptions for low-income populations and affordable housing.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.093775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.670416", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2205, "fingerprint": "2022|202200001|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200001|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c91dccaec6718e46", "measure_id": "202200001", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve and enhance agriculture in the unincorporated area of Alameda County, shall the \"Save Agriculture and Open Space Lands\" Initiative (Measure D, November 2000) allow (1) a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for agricultural buildings in Large Parcel Agriculture areas and (2) a maximum floor area ratio of .025, with a minimum of 20,000 and a maximum of 60,000 square feet, for covered equestrian riding arenas in Large Parcel Agriculture and Resource Management areas?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 298036, "no_votes": 129499, "total_votes": 427535, "percent_yes": 69.71031611447016, "percent_no": 30.28968388552984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends a 2000 agricultural preservation initiative to allow agri...", "summary_text": "This measure amends a 2000 agricultural preservation initiative to allow agricultural buildings in Large Parcel Agriculture areas to have a maximum floor area ratio of 0.025, and permits covered equestrian riding arenas of 20,000 to 60,000 square feet with the same floor area ratio in Large Parcel Agriculture and Resource Management areas. The changes are intended to preserve and enhance agriculture in unincorporated Alameda County while allowing specified agricultural and equestrian structures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.087912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.668494", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2206, "fingerprint": "2022|202200096|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200096|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5f9f92595dbdbb3a", "measure_id": "202200096", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow City Council to increase salaries for Councilmembers ($1,200/year) and Mayor ($3,600/year) for the first time since the 1970s, by capping annual salaries at an amount not to exceed 30% of the salary for \"All Occupations, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area\" (currently approximately $25,977) effective July 2023?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15276, "no_votes": 13031, "total_votes": 28307, "percent_yes": 53.96545024198961, "percent_no": 46.03454975801039, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment allows Alameda's City Council to increase the Mayor's ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment allows Alameda's City Council to increase the Mayor's salary to up to $3,600 annually and Councilmembers' salaries to up to $1,200 annually, with future salary caps tied to 30% of the average salary for all occupations in the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The measure represents the first salary increase for these positions since the 1970s, taking effect in July 2023.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.089086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.668702", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2207, "fingerprint": "2022|202200097|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200097|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "013df86cf3fc55ac", "measure_id": "202200097", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City of Alameda transient occupancy tax from 10% to 14%, paid by hotel/ motel/ short-term rental guests, generating approximately $700,000 to $910,000 annually until ended by voters, for general government use such as maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response times, supporting fire/ paramedic/ police services, repairing potholes/ deteriorating streets and maintaining clean/ safe parks/ beaches?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16942, "no_votes": 11631, "total_votes": 28573, "percent_yes": 59.29373884436357, "percent_no": 40.70626115563643, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases Alameda's transient occupancy tax from 10% to 14% on ho...", "summary_text": "The measure increases Alameda's transient occupancy tax from 10% to 14% on hotel, motel, and short-term rental guests, generating an estimated $700,000 to $910,000 annually for general government services. The revenue can be used for emergency response, public safety services, street repairs, and park and beach maintenance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.089605", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.668861", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2215, "fingerprint": "2022|202200423|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200423|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "92876f99e6287e62", "measure_id": "202200423", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade aging classrooms, labs and job training facilities to meet safety/ instructional standards and support science, technology, engineering and math instruction; fix leaky roofs/ deteriorating plumbing/ electrical/ heating/ cooling systems; keep instructional technology up-to-date; and improve security/ fire/ earthquake safety shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District's measure issuing $450,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, approximately 6(cents) per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($30,000,000 annually) be adopted, with independent oversight, audits and no funds for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17037, "no_votes": 16958, "total_votes": 33995, "percent_yes": 50.11619355787615, "percent_no": 49.88380644212385, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District to issue $450 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, labs, and job training facilities, repair infrastructure systems, update technology, and improve safety features. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.093353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.670262", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2226, "fingerprint": "2022|202200424|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200424|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1b10d459fd223449", "measure_id": "202200424", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue to: reduce dropout rates; prepare Oakland students for college and 21st century careers; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; and provide mentoring, tutoring, and counseling; shall the Oakland Unified School District measure renewing the $120 parcel tax for 14 years, without increasing the initial tax rate, adding annual cost-of-living adjustments, exemptions for seniors and specified low-income individuals, and independent oversight and audits, generating at least $11.5 million annually that the State cannot take away be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 102745, "no_votes": 23144, "total_votes": 125889, "percent_yes": 81.61555020692832, "percent_no": 18.38444979307168, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed a $120 annual parcel tax for the Oakland Unified School ...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed a $120 annual parcel tax for the Oakland Unified School District for 14 years to fund educational programs including dropout prevention, college preparation, teacher retention, and student support services. The renewal maintained the existing tax rate while adding cost-of-living adjustments and exemptions for seniors and low-income individuals, generating at least $11.5 million annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.097090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.672016", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2227, "fingerprint": "2022|202200425|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200425|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ed643a2a59b42670", "measure_id": "202200425", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue replacing/modernizing deteriorating plumbing, roofs, electrical/HVAC systems, classrooms, science labs, performing arts, physical education facilities/spaces, and alternative high school facilities; constructing career technical/early childhood education classrooms; making safety/access improvements for students with disabilities; shall Pleasanton Unified School District's measure authorizing $395,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $49 per $100,000 of assessed valuation ($26,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring audits/oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15710, "no_votes": 11757, "total_votes": 27467, "percent_yes": 57.19590781665271, "percent_no": 42.80409218334729, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Pleasanton Unified School District to issue $395 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Pleasanton Unified School District to issue $395 million in bonds to replace and modernize school facilities including plumbing, roofs, electrical systems, classrooms, labs, and performing arts spaces, while also constructing new career technical and early childhood education facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $49 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.097445", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.672166", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2228, "fingerprint": "2022|202200426|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200426|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e4af555bce0d28bf", "measure_id": "202200426", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education facilities; make safety and security improvements; renovate electrical, plumbing and HVAC systems; repair/replace leaky roofs; and construct a technology, engineering, and math lab; shall Sunol Glen Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing the issuance of $10,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $614,500 annually while bonds are outstanding, at rates of approximately 5.2 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 316, "no_votes": 214, "total_votes": 530, "percent_yes": 59.62264150943396, "percent_no": 40.37735849056604, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Sunol Glen Unified School District to issue $10", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Sunol Glen Unified School District to issue $10.9 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including safety upgrades, infrastructure repairs, roof replacements, and construction of a technology/engineering/math lab. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 5.2 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $614,500 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.097791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.672316", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2209, "fingerprint": "2022|202200098|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200098|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d6a3c0209d8c5f3f", "measure_id": "202200098", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and enhance local paramedic, advanced life support, firefighting services, firefighting equipment and ambulance service; shall a measure repealing the current two special emergency services taxes and adding a new Emergency Medical Services, Advanced Life Support, and Fire Protection Special Tax on residential and commercial property at $0.074 per square foot of land, providing $1,950,000 annually, subject to CPI adjustment, until ended by voters, exempting very low-income residents, with annual independent audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5752, "no_votes": 1794, "total_votes": 7546, "percent_yes": 76.2258150013252, "percent_no": 23.774184998674798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would repeal two existing emergency services taxes in Alameda an...", "summary_text": "This measure would repeal two existing emergency services taxes in Alameda and replace them with a new special tax of $0.074 per square foot of land on residential and commercial properties to fund paramedic, advanced life support, firefighting services, equipment, and ambulance service. The tax would generate approximately $1,950,000 annually with cost-of-living adjustments, include exemptions for very low-income residents, and continue until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.090490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.669175", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2210, "fingerprint": "2022|202200099|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200099|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d22c0d2ff338a85d", "measure_id": "202200099", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to create affordable housing; repair streets and sidewalks; underground utilities; and enhance buildings, infrastructure, and safety, authorizing the issuance of $650 million in general obligation bonds, subject to independent oversight and audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26545, "no_votes": 18130, "total_votes": 44675, "percent_yes": 59.41801902630106, "percent_no": 40.58198097369894, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Alameda to issue $650 million in general o...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Alameda to issue $650 million in general obligation bonds to fund affordable housing creation, street and sidewalk repairs, utility undergrounding, and building and infrastructure improvements. The bonds would have been subject to independent oversight and auditing requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.090889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.669335", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11032, "fingerprint": "2022|202200100|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200100|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c21146f573877864", "measure_id": "202200100", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to tax property owners who keep residential units vacant more than 182 days per year, $3,000 for each nonexempt condominium, duplex, single family dwelling, or townhouse vacant unit in the first year, increasing to $6,000 for each subsequent year, and $6,000 for all other residential units vacant in the first year, increasing to $12,000 for each subsequent year, with exceptions, from January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2034, generating between $3,900,000 and $5,900,000 annually, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28805, "no_votes": 15549, "total_votes": 44354, "percent_yes": 64.94340983902241, "percent_no": 35.05659016097759, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a tax on residential property owners who keep units ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a tax on residential property owners who keep units vacant for more than 182 days per year, with rates of $3,000-$6,000 for single-family homes and condos in the first year (doubling in subsequent years) and $6,000-$12,000 for other residential units, effective from 2024 to 2034. The tax is projected to generate $3.9 to $5.9 million annually for Alameda.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.215083", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.091267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.669492", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2208, "fingerprint": "2022|202200422|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200422|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "262c36b72de84a00", "measure_id": "202200422", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade local classrooms, math/science labs, technology, college/career training facilities for high quality academic education; improve accessibility, earthquake safety, school security, water quality/ plumbing systems; renovate, acquire, construct, classrooms, sites, facilities/ equipment; shall Alameda Unified School District's measure authorizing $298,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising approximately $14.7 million annually by levying, on average, $45/$100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with audits, independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11425, "no_votes": 8856, "total_votes": 20281, "percent_yes": 56.33351412652237, "percent_no": 43.66648587347763, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Alameda Unified School District to issue $298 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Alameda Unified School District to issue $298 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, labs, technology, and facilities, including improvements for accessibility, earthquake safety, and school security. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $45 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.090064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.669017", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2211, "fingerprint": "2022|202200101|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200101|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "894939f7cbc8642d", "measure_id": "202200101", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall any federal, state or local public entity be empowered to develop, construct or acquire an additional 3,000 units of low-rent housing in the City of Berkeley for persons of low income?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33791, "no_votes": 10597, "total_votes": 44388, "percent_yes": 76.12643056681986, "percent_no": 23.873569433180137, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize federal, state, or local public entities to deve...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize federal, state, or local public entities to develop, construct, or acquire up to 3,000 additional low-rent housing units in Berkeley for low-income residents.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.091801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.669646", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2212, "fingerprint": "2022|202200102|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200102|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "67351bbbd1ee7104", "measure_id": "202200102", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to fund general City services including fire/emergency response/police; street/sidewalk/park maintenance; water pollution prevention; disaster preparedness; affordable housing; senior/childcare/recreation services, by increasing the City of Emeryville Real Property Transfer Tax to $15 per thousand for property sales between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000 and $25 per thousand for property sales above $ 2,000,000, raising $ 5,000,000 annually until ended by voters, with citizen oversight, audits, and public disclosure of all spending be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2549, "no_votes": 1027, "total_votes": 3576, "percent_yes": 71.2807606263982, "percent_no": 28.719239373601795, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Emeryville's real property transfer tax to $15 per $1,...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Emeryville's real property transfer tax to $15 per $1,000 for property sales between $1-2 million and $25 per $1,000 for sales above $2 million. The tax is expected to raise $5 million annually to fund general city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, housing programs, and social services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.092158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.669797", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2213, "fingerprint": "2022|202200103|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200103|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f04063d575974bdc", "measure_id": "202200103", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance amending the South Livermore Urban Growth Boundary policies in the City of Livermore's General Plan to allow the City to extend sewer service to permitted uses within the South Livermore Valley Area Plan Planning Area be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21098, "no_votes": 10583, "total_votes": 31681, "percent_yes": 66.5951201035321, "percent_no": 33.404879896467904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Wastewater/Sewage", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended Livermore's Urban Growth Boundary policies to allow the c...", "summary_text": "The measure amended Livermore's Urban Growth Boundary policies to allow the city to extend sewer service to permitted uses within the South Livermore Valley Area Plan Planning Area.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.092527", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.669951", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2217, "fingerprint": "2022|202200104|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200104|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "44573a4ece5ffc82", "measure_id": "202200104", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to authorize the City of Oakland to develop, construct, or acquire, or assist the development of, up to 13,000 low rent residential units in social housing projects within the City for the purpose of providing affordable rental housing be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 100844, "no_votes": 25107, "total_votes": 125951, "percent_yes": 80.06605743503425, "percent_no": 19.933942564965747, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of Oakland to develop, construct, acquire, o...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of Oakland to develop, construct, acquire, or assist in creating up to 13,000 low-rent residential units through social housing projects. The initiative aims to provide affordable rental housing within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.094137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.670583", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2218, "fingerprint": "2022|202200105|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200105|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "25bbfcb19f08d971", "measure_id": "202200105", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to amend the City Charter to replace gender-specific language with gender neutral language, such as replacing words like \"fireman\" with \"firefighters\" and using gender-neutral pronouns in referring to City officers and staff, recognizing that women and non-binary persons as well as men are qualified for and hold such positions, and to avoid gender stereotyping and discrimination, and promote inclusivity be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95980, "no_votes": 31192, "total_votes": 127172, "percent_yes": 75.47258830560186, "percent_no": 24.52741169439814, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment replaced gender-specific language in Alameda's City Ch...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment replaced gender-specific language in Alameda's City Charter with gender-neutral terms, such as changing \"fireman\" to \"firefighters\" and using gender-neutral pronouns when referring to city officers and staff.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.094462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.670735", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2219, "fingerprint": "2022|202200106|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200106|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "dc1ad7e01f82427f", "measure_id": "202200106", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to amend the City Charter to allow the City Council by adopting an ordinance, to authorize voting by noncitizen residents, who are the parents, legal guardians, or legally recognized caregivers of a child, for the Office of Oakland School Board Director if they are otherwise eligible to vote under state and local law be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83637, "no_votes": 41985, "total_votes": 125622, "percent_yes": 66.57830634761427, "percent_no": 33.42169365238573, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the City Charter to allow the City Council to authorize n...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the City Charter to allow the City Council to authorize noncitizen residents who are parents, legal guardians, or legally recognized caregivers of children to vote for Oakland School Board Director positions, provided they meet other state and local voting eligibility requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.094836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.670885", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2220, "fingerprint": "2022|202200107|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200107|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "431c3d09564bcc6f", "measure_id": "202200107", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending Oakland's business tax rates to create a progressive rate structure that would (1) impose the highest rates on the highest grossing businesses, (2) increase Oakland's annual tax revenue by an estimated $20,900,000, and (3) generate approximately $124,000,000 in total annual revenue for municipal services by imposing business tax rates of .05% to .55% of gross receipts, and other rates as stated in the measure, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89926, "no_votes": 35367, "total_votes": 125293, "percent_yes": 71.77256510738829, "percent_no": 28.22743489261171, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended Oakland's business tax structure to implement progressive...", "summary_text": "The measure amended Oakland's business tax structure to implement progressive rates ranging from 0.05% to 0.55% of gross receipts, with higher rates applied to businesses with higher gross revenues. The change was estimated to increase the city's annual business tax revenue by approximately $20.9 million, generating about $124 million total annually for municipal services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.095174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.671038", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2221, "fingerprint": "2022|202200108|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200108|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "875b0585f6b968e9", "measure_id": "202200108", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to improve public safety and invest in Oakland by creating affordable housing for Oaklanders, increasing housing for homeless Oaklanders, repaving streets to remove potholes, improving traffic/pedestrian safety, and updating fire stations and other public facilities, by issuing $850,000,000 in general obligation bonds, raising approximately $85,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at the rate of $0.071 per $100 ($71 per $100,000) of assessed value, with independent oversight and annual audits be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95816, "no_votes": 31387, "total_votes": 127203, "percent_yes": 75.32526748582974, "percent_no": 24.67473251417026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Oakland to issue $850 million in general obligation b...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Oakland to issue $850 million in general obligation bonds to fund affordable housing, homeless housing, street repairs, traffic safety improvements, and updates to fire stations and other public facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $71 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.095490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.671190", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2222, "fingerprint": "2022|202200109|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200109|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "facfcccb709a5591", "measure_id": "202200109", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Measure amending the Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance to: (1) prohibit no-fault evictions of children and educators during the school year; (2) extend eviction protections to tenants in recreational vehicles (RVs), tiny homes on wheels, and newly constructed units except during the first 10 years after issuance of the certificate of occupancy; (3) remove failure to sign a new lease as grounds for eviction; and (4) make other clarifying amendments, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84758, "no_votes": 39331, "total_votes": 124089, "percent_yes": 68.30420101701198, "percent_no": 31.695798982988023, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended Alameda's Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance to prohibit n...", "summary_text": "The measure amended Alameda's Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance to prohibit no-fault evictions of children and educators during the school year, extend eviction protections to tenants in RVs and tiny homes, and remove failure to sign a new lease as grounds for eviction. It also extended protections to newly constructed units after their first 10 years following certificate of occupancy.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.095790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.671344", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2223, "fingerprint": "2022|202200110|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200110|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fd370d3f28f063e8", "measure_id": "202200110", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Measure amending the Oakland Municipal Code and City Charter to establish resident public financing for candidate election campaigns, increase transparency regarding independent spending in City elections, further restrict former city officials from acting as lobbyists, and provide additional resources to the Public Ethics Commission for implementation be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91279, "no_votes": 32206, "total_votes": 123485, "percent_yes": 73.9190994857675, "percent_no": 26.080900514232496, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Oakland's Municipal Code and City Charter to create a pu...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Oakland's Municipal Code and City Charter to create a public campaign financing system for residents running for office, enhance transparency requirements for independent election spending, expand lobbying restrictions on former city officials, and provide additional funding to the Public Ethics Commission.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.096120", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.671547", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2224, "fingerprint": "2022|202200111|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200111|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "58eaead172aeba48", "measure_id": "202200111", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure to amend the Charter to, among other things, establish Councilmember term limits, require two hearings before Council places certain measures on the ballot; count Councilmember abstentions and absences as \"no\" votes in determining whether Mayor may break a tie; provide Public Ethics Commission discretion in setting Councilmember salaries; authorize the Commission to set City Attorney and Auditor salaries; and add and detail duties and provide minimum staffing for the Auditor, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 94497, "no_votes": 23319, "total_votes": 117816, "percent_yes": 80.2072723568955, "percent_no": 19.7927276431045, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Alameda's city charter to establish term limits for city ...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Alameda's city charter to establish term limits for city council members, require two hearings before the council can place certain measures on ballots, and gives the Public Ethics Commission authority to set salaries for council members, the city attorney, and auditor. It also changes tie-breaking vote procedures by counting abstentions and absences as \"no\" votes, and expands the duties and minimum staffing requirements for the city auditor position.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.096484", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.671710", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2225, "fingerprint": "2022|202200112|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200112|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "cf84a782f4fafda9", "measure_id": "202200112", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to amend Oakland's Municipal Code to fund Oakland Zoo operations, staffing, maintenance and capital improvements, including but not limited to animal care and rehabilitation, educational and conservation programs, fire prevention, accessibility, and visitor services, by imposing an annual $68 parcel tax for single-family parcels, and other parcels as specified, for 20 years, raising approximately $12,000,000 annually with exemptions for low-income households and others, and citizen oversight, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 77769, "no_votes": 45529, "total_votes": 123298, "percent_yes": 63.07401579912083, "percent_no": 36.92598420087917, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Zoos", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed an annual $68 parcel tax on single-family properties and...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed an annual $68 parcel tax on single-family properties and other specified parcels for 20 years to fund Oakland Zoo operations, maintenance, and improvements including animal care, educational programs, and facility upgrades. The tax includes exemptions for low-income households and is expected to raise approximately $12 million annually with citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.096782", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.671866", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2229, "fingerprint": "2022|202200113|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200113|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a6c94461e6950e5f", "measure_id": "202200113", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALAMEDA Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain funding the State cannot take away for Union City services, such as keeping fire stations open/ fully staffed, 9-1-1 emergency response, street/ pothole repair, paramedic services, neighborhood police patrols, disaster preparedness, senior/ youth programs and for general government use, shall the City of Union City measure extending the existing voter-approved sales tax without increasing the current 1/2(cents) rate be adopted, raising $6,600,000 annually for nine years, with annual audits, independent oversight and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12782, "no_votes": 4398, "total_votes": 17180, "percent_yes": 74.40046565774155, "percent_no": 25.59953434225845, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Union City's existing half-cent sales tax for nine years...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Union City's existing half-cent sales tax for nine years without increasing the current rate, generating approximately $6,600,000 annually for general city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and community programs. The measure includes provisions for annual audits and independent oversight to ensure funds remain local.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.098128", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.672469", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALAMEDA Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2230, "fingerprint": "2022|202200002|ALPINE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200002|ALPINE", "content_hash": "8a482ce2792d2e78", "measure_id": "202200002", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Alpine", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ALPINE Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure prohibiting the construction of a Biomass Facility and prohibiting Alpine County employees, officers, and elected officials from issuing permits or authorizing the use of public funds to analyze, study, or facilitate construction of a Biomass Facility in Eastern Alpine County be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 320, "no_votes": 279, "total_votes": 599, "percent_yes": 53.42237061769616, "percent_no": 46.57762938230384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure prohibits the construction of biomass facilities in Eastern Alpi...", "summary_text": "This measure prohibits the construction of biomass facilities in Eastern Alpine County and bars county officials from issuing permits or using public funds to study or facilitate such construction. The measure passed with 50.5% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.098491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.672621", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ALPINE Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alpine_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2233, "fingerprint": "2022|202200114|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200114|AMADOR", "content_hash": "4732027bdcbee23c", "measure_id": "202200114", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "AMADOR Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of Plymouth City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 194, "no_votes": 301, "total_votes": 495, "percent_yes": 39.1919191919192, "percent_no": 60.8080808080808, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.099608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.673099", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMADOR Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2234, "fingerprint": "2022|202200115|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200115|AMADOR", "content_hash": "47450ddde75395d2", "measure_id": "202200115", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "AMADOR Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of Plymouth City Treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 185, "no_votes": 312, "total_votes": 497, "percent_yes": 37.223340040241446, "percent_no": 62.776659959758554, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.099893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.673250", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMADOR Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2232, "fingerprint": "2022|202200427|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200427|AMADOR", "content_hash": "3d99deda50b501d3", "measure_id": "202200427", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "AMADOR Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and improve local schools, shall Amador County Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted to repair old classrooms and facilities; repair/ replace leaky roofs and outdated infrastructure; replace outdated portables with permanent classrooms; and build new facilities to improve the quality of education at consolidated schools; by issuing $64,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 5\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, raising an estimated average $4,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with audits and citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7915, "no_votes": 10288, "total_votes": 18203, "percent_yes": 43.48184365214525, "percent_no": 56.51815634785475, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Amador County Unified School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Amador County Unified School District to issue $64 million in bonds to repair classrooms and facilities, replace roofs and infrastructure, convert portable classrooms to permanent ones, and build new facilities at consolidated schools. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 5 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising an estimated $4.3 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.099198", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.672925", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMADOR Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2231, "fingerprint": "2022|202200003|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200003|AMADOR", "content_hash": "5402b1777fcc9bc9", "measure_id": "202200003", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "AMADOR Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Should the Amador County Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10116, "no_votes": 7911, "total_votes": 18027, "percent_yes": 56.11582626060909, "percent_no": 43.88417373939091, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.098850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.672775", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMADOR Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2236, "fingerprint": "2022|202200116|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200116|BUTTE", "content_hash": "7745bd009b9416a2", "measure_id": "202200116", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support vital city services including: maintaining/repairing streets, storm drains, sidewalks, and fixing potholes; addressing homelessness; protecting 911 emergency response times; preserving the number of on\u2010duty police officers and fire fighters; maintaining/improving Bidwell Park, neighborhood parks, and funding other general services and essential activity; shall an ordinance establishing a l percent sales tax, providing approximately $24,000,000 annually until ended by voters, subject to annual audits, with all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17320, "no_votes": 15530, "total_votes": 32850, "percent_yes": 52.724505327245055, "percent_no": 47.275494672754945, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1% sales tax in Butte, California to fund city ser...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1% sales tax in Butte, California to fund city services including street maintenance, emergency response, police and fire services, park upkeep, and homelessness programs. The tax is expected to generate approximately $24 million annually and will remain in effect until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.100539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.673546", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2238, "fingerprint": "2022|202200428|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200428|BUTTE", "content_hash": "8298d4d32cb813f0", "measure_id": "202200428", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve educational facilities at Gridley High School; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace outdated heating, ventilation and cooling systems; shall the Gridley Unified School District measure authorizing $16,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 4 cents per $100 assessed value, generating on average $870,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1922, "no_votes": 1271, "total_votes": 3193, "percent_yes": 60.19417475728155, "percent_no": 39.80582524271845, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Gridley Unified School District to issue $16", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Gridley Unified School District to issue $16.3 million in bonds to repair and modernize facilities at Gridley High School, including roof repairs, classroom renovations, and heating/cooling system replacements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 4 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.101239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.673864", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2235, "fingerprint": "2022|202200004|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200004|BUTTE", "content_hash": "1adfe0ea75c62996", "measure_id": "202200004", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Should the Butte County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional three dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49121, "no_votes": 19822, "total_votes": 68943, "percent_yes": 71.24871270469808, "percent_no": 28.75128729530192, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed Butte County's Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program for t...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed Butte County's Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program for ten years, continuing fees of $1 per vehicle and an additional $3 for certain commercial vehicles to fund the removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.100257", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.673396", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2237, "fingerprint": "2022|202200117|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200117|BUTTE", "content_hash": "5015d34e8b95aff3", "measure_id": "202200117", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "BUTTE Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance which requires the City of Chico be held to abide by the same public nuisance laws it imposes on private landowners by establishing a right for residents uniquely harmed by a public nuisance to demand the abatement of public nuisances by the City on City-owned public property; and requires the City to respond to the demand by abating the alleged nuisance or providing the reason for its refusal, limited to prescribed justifications, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18934, "no_votes": 12582, "total_votes": 31516, "percent_yes": 60.07742099251174, "percent_no": 39.92257900748826, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance requires the City of Chico to follow the same public nuisance ...", "summary_text": "This ordinance requires the City of Chico to follow the same public nuisance laws it enforces on private property owners when it comes to city-owned public property. It establishes a process for residents to demand the city address public nuisances on city property and requires the city to either fix the problem or provide a legally prescribed justification for refusing to do so.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.100908", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.673714", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2239, "fingerprint": "2022|202200005|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200005|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "84cb0deb13856285", "measure_id": "202200005", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CALAVERAS Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund local fire districts and the City of Angels Camp Fire Department for staffing, training, equipment, and other costs, shall the measure enacting a one percent (1%) transactions and use (sales) tax on all sales of tangible personal property sold at retail in Calaveras County, including the City of Angels Camp, generating approximately $5M annually, without expiration, and increasing appropriation limits consistent with the increased revenue through fiscal year 2026/27, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10261, "no_votes": 10527, "total_votes": 20788, "percent_yes": 49.36020781219935, "percent_no": 50.63979218780065, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.101538", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.674016", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CALAVERAS Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2240, "fingerprint": "2022|202200429|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200429|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "ee3978614b52cc72", "measure_id": "202200429", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CALAVERAS Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renovate and construct career and vocational education classrooms and labs, update athletic facilities, upgrade facilities for career training including agriculture, medical sciences and engineering, shall Calaveras Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $39.3 million in bonds be adopted, with legal interest rates, estimated levies averaging 5\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value ($2.5 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, citizen oversight, independent audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5575, "no_votes": 5659, "total_votes": 11234, "percent_yes": 49.62613494748086, "percent_no": 50.37386505251914, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Calaveras Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Calaveras Unified School District to issue $39.3 million in bonds to renovate and construct career and vocational education facilities, update athletic facilities, and upgrade training facilities for agriculture, medical sciences, and engineering. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies averaging 5 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.102134", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.674168", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CALAVERAS Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2241, "fingerprint": "2022|202200006|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200006|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "d20859a12dc0240b", "measure_id": "202200006", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CALAVERAS Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Resolution No. 22-02 of the Circle XX Community Services District, establishing a special tax for a ten-year period (July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2033) in the annual amount of $500 per parcel of real property, generating approximately $71,254 in revenue (for maintaining and improving roads in the District or for any incidental purposes, including maintenance of road ditches, culverts and road signs; and roadside spraying, grass cutting and tree trimming.) be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86, "no_votes": 35, "total_votes": 121, "percent_yes": 71.07438016528926, "percent_no": 28.925619834710744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a $500 annual special tax per parcel in the Circle X...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a $500 annual special tax per parcel in the Circle XX Community Services District for ten years (2023-2033) to fund road maintenance and improvements, including ditches, culverts, signs, and roadside maintenance. The tax is expected to generate approximately $71,254 annually in revenue for these transportation infrastructure purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.102677", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.674331", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CALAVERAS Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2243, "fingerprint": "2022|202200007|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200007|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "616a557624237945", "measure_id": "202200007", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CALAVERAS Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, to maintain Middle River Community Services District\u2019s roads, to impose a new special tax, replacing the existing one of $100.00 per improved lot and $75.00 per unimproved lot, be adopted without expiration, at $200.00 per improved lot and $150.00 per unimproved lot? This increase in tax would generate an approximate, additional $13,000.00 annually and would be collected semi-annually via property tax payments, resulting in an approximate $26,000.00 total annual revenue to the District.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35, "no_votes": 25, "total_votes": 60, "percent_yes": 58.333333333333336, "percent_no": 41.666666666666664, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have doubled the Middle River Community Services District's...", "summary_text": "The measure would have doubled the Middle River Community Services District's special tax for road maintenance from $100 to $200 per improved lot and $75 to $150 per unimproved lot, generating approximately $26,000 in total annual revenue. The tax would have been collected semi-annually through property tax payments with no expiration date.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.103752", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.674653", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CALAVERAS Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2242, "fingerprint": "2022|202200430|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200430|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "7992f7ea02acc386", "measure_id": "202200430", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CALAVERAS Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update classrooms in Copperopolis and Mark Twain Elementary schools; repair/replace roofs, windows, outdated HVAC, plumbing, and aging portables; expand classrooms for the youngest students; and improve safety and campus accessibility; shall Mark Twain Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $9,300,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 1.95\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value and raising an estimated average $640,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, annual audits, no money for salaries and all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2471, "no_votes": 2142, "total_votes": 4613, "percent_yes": 53.566009104704094, "percent_no": 46.433990895295906, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Mark Twain Union Elementary School Dis...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Mark Twain Union Elementary School District to issue $9,300,000 in bonds to update classrooms, repair infrastructure including roofs and HVAC systems, expand facilities for younger students, and improve safety and accessibility at Copperopolis and Mark Twain Elementary schools. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of approximately 1.95 cents per $100 of assessed property value, raising an estimated $640,000 annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.103251", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.674484", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CALAVERAS Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2244, "fingerprint": "2022|202200008|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200008|COLUSA", "content_hash": "d9bd86f521604f3b", "measure_id": "202200008", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "COLUSA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the County of Colusa to collect a one half of one percent (. 5%) sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for the purpose of providing emergency medical ground transportation services within the County of Colusa, providing approximately $2, 400,000 annually for special revenue purposes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3776, "no_votes": 1681, "total_votes": 5457, "percent_yes": 69.19552867876122, "percent_no": 30.80447132123878, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Emergency Medical/Paramedic", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Colusa County to collect a 0", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Colusa County to collect a 0.5% sales tax to fund emergency medical ground transportation services, generating approximately $2.4 million annually in special revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.104280", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.674812", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "COLUSA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2245, "fingerprint": "2022|202200118|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200118|COLUSA", "content_hash": "8c81a3c9fe8c0c2e", "measure_id": "202200118", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "COLUSA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "For general government use, such as improving the City of Colusa's streets, parks and other infrastructure, providing police/fire/emergency medical services, shall an ordinance imposing a one-percent transactions (sales) and use tax, to expire after four years unless extended by both the voters and City Council, be adopted, providing approximately two million dollars annually, with all funds locally controlled, a citizen's oversight committee and subject to annual audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 906, "no_votes": 818, "total_votes": 1724, "percent_yes": 52.55220417633411, "percent_no": 47.44779582366589, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a 1% sales and use tax in Colusa for four years to fund ...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a 1% sales and use tax in Colusa for four years to fund general city services including street and park improvements, infrastructure, and police/fire/emergency medical services, generating approximately $2 million annually. The tax includes provisions for citizen oversight, annual audits, and requires both voter and City Council approval for any extension beyond the four-year term.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.104962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.674960", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "COLUSA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2246, "fingerprint": "2022|202200119|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200119|COLUSA", "content_hash": "a36ad962ffa89daa", "measure_id": "202200119", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "COLUSA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted increasing the City's sales tax rate from 1/2% to 1%, providing approximately $750,000 annually until ended by voters, to fund general City services, such as street maintenance and repair, public safety, and youth and senior programs, requiring annual independent audits with all funds benefiting Williams residents?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 338, "no_votes": 375, "total_votes": 713, "percent_yes": 47.40532959326788, "percent_no": 52.59467040673212, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.105462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.675112", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "COLUSA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2253, "fingerprint": "2022|202200431|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200431|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b0ecf9b1d4ffe132", "measure_id": "202200431", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renew expiring local school funding without increasing taxes; preserve quality academics in math, science, reading, writing, engineering and technology; attract and retain qualified teachers; preserve TK-12 technology and elementary science specialists; keep classroom technology and curriculum up-to-date, shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted extending the existing $138 parcel tax for seven years, providing approximately $4,000,000 annually that cannot be taken by the State, with senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and all funds benefitting Livermore students?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35, "no_votes": 33, "total_votes": 68, "percent_yes": 51.470588235294116, "percent_no": 48.529411764705884, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have extended an existing $138 annual parcel tax in the Li...", "summary_text": "This measure would have extended an existing $138 annual parcel tax in the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District for seven years to provide approximately $4 million annually for educational programs and services. The measure included exemptions for seniors and independent oversight, with funds designated solely for local school use.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-05-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.109208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.676186", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2254, "fingerprint": "2022|202200120|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200120|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "1febbbcc2497c03c", "measure_id": "202200120", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure of the City of Martinez to levy a dedicated special tax to prevent development and acquire, create and maintain 297 acres of permanent public parkland and wildlife habitat known as the Alhambra Highlands, at a maximum rate of $79 annually for single-family parcels and at specified maximum rates for other parcel types, for 30 years, providing approximately $1.2 million annually, with exemptions for low-income persons, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7992, "no_votes": 3629, "total_votes": 11621, "percent_yes": 68.77205059805524, "percent_no": 31.227949401944755, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Land Use: Open Space", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of Martinez to levy a special tax for 30 yea...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of Martinez to levy a special tax for 30 years at a maximum rate of $79 annually for single-family parcels (with specified rates for other property types) to fund the acquisition and maintenance of 297 acres of parkland and wildlife habitat in the Alhambra Highlands area. The tax is expected to generate approximately $1.2 million annually and includes exemptions for low-income residents.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.110347", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.676514", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11033, "fingerprint": "2022|202200432|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200432|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7b780f3ce87ae767", "measure_id": "202200432", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade aging classrooms, labs and job training facilities to meet safety/ instructional standards and support science, technology, engineering and math instruction; fix leaky roofs/ deteriorating plumbing/ electrical/ heating/ cooling systems; keep instructional technology upto-date; and improve security/ fire/ earthquake safety shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure issuing $450,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, approximately 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($30,000,000 annually) be adopted, with independent oversight, audits and no funds for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57, "no_votes": 72, "total_votes": 129, "percent_yes": 44.18604651162791, "percent_no": 55.81395348837209, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District to issue $450 million in bonds to fund facility upgrades including classroom renovations, infrastructure repairs, technology updates, and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.231784", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.109770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.676352", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2248, "fingerprint": "2022|202200009|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200009|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "199cea974867f890", "measure_id": "202200009", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure extending the Contra Costa County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated annual fee, at a rate of one dollar per vehicle registered in Contra Costa County and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles registered in Contra Costa County, which is estimated to generate $1,100,000 annually for removing and disposing of abandoned and wrecked vehicles, until April 30, 2032, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 150903, "no_votes": 73051, "total_votes": 223954, "percent_yes": 67.38124793484376, "percent_no": 32.618752065156244, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Contra Costa County's Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Progra...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Contra Costa County's Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program until April 30, 2032, maintaining an annual fee of $1 per registered vehicle and an additional $2 for certain commercial vehicles. The program is estimated to generate $1.1 million annually to fund the removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles throughout the county.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.106499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.675411", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2251, "fingerprint": "2022|202200011|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200011|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "697c660b420fc5e9", "measure_id": "202200011", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 be established at $5,399,362.00 and the limit for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 (i.e., $5,399,362.00) be used to determine the limits for Fiscal Years 2023- 2024 through 2026-2027?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2305, "no_votes": 531, "total_votes": 2836, "percent_yes": 81.27644569816643, "percent_no": 18.723554301833573, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": "Revenues", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes the Kensington Police Protection and Community Servi...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District's appropriations limit at $5,399,362 for fiscal year 2022-2023 and uses that amount as the baseline to calculate spending limits for the following four fiscal years through 2026-2027.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.108191", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.675882", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2259, "fingerprint": "2022|202200434|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200434|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "26a81e9b1b396321", "measure_id": "202200434", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade, modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms, libraries and school facilities; upgrade energy efficiency; and make health, safety and security improvements, shall Walnut Creek School District\u2019s measure be adopted to issue $134,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $8,000,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 2.2\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent oversight, and no money for salaries or taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15029, "no_votes": 8959, "total_votes": 23988, "percent_yes": 62.652159413039854, "percent_no": 37.347840586960146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Walnut Creek School District to issue $134 millio...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Walnut Creek School District to issue $134 million in bonds to upgrade, modernize and renovate school facilities including classrooms, restrooms, and libraries, as well as improve energy efficiency and safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 2.2 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $8 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.112970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.677296", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2255, "fingerprint": "2022|202200433|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200433|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "c22973fa20e2a68f", "measure_id": "202200433", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; make health, safety, and security improvements; and upgrade infrastructure and systems for energy efficiency, shall the Martinez Unified School District measure authorizing $90,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately 3.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising $5.6 million annually while bonds are outstanding, with a board appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6645, "no_votes": 5989, "total_votes": 12634, "percent_yes": 52.596169067595376, "percent_no": 47.403830932404624, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Martinez Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Martinez Unified School District to issue $90 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, make health and safety improvements, and upgrade infrastructure for energy efficiency. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of approximately 3.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating about $5.6 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.111019", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.676666", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2249, "fingerprint": "2022|202200010|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200010|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "953633cd23373391", "measure_id": "202200010", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Crockett Community Services District collect a special tax of up to $50 annually, generating approximately $60,000 annually, with no automatic expiration, and with Consumer Price Index adjustments of up to 7% annually, by adopting the proposed initiative ordinance \u2018Enacting a Special Tax on Properties Located in the Crockett Zone of the District to Fund Maintenance of Public Outdoor Spaces and Amenities\u2019, for town maintenance and landscaping activities as set forth in the ordinance?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 958, "no_votes": 568, "total_votes": 1526, "percent_yes": 62.77850589777195, "percent_no": 37.22149410222805, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Maintenance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Crockett Community Services District to collect an...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Crockett Community Services District to collect an annual special tax of up to $50 per property to fund maintenance of public outdoor spaces and amenities, generating approximately $60,000 annually. The tax has no expiration date and includes automatic Consumer Price Index adjustments capped at 7% annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.107083", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.675561", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2256, "fingerprint": "2022|202200123|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200123|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "08e7456743f4d291", "measure_id": "202200123", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7468, "no_votes": 5732, "total_votes": 13200, "percent_yes": 56.57575757575758, "percent_no": 43.42424242424242, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.111465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.676829", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2250, "fingerprint": "2022|202200122|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200122|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "197cde882e2e41d7", "measure_id": "202200122", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance to maintain Hercules\u2019 financial stability and essential services, such as neighborhood police patrols; meeting local water quality health standards; retaining/ attracting local businesses, and general community services, by renewing a voter approved 8% utility users\u2019 tax, generating approximately $3,600,000 annually until ended by voters, with no tax increase, low-income exemptions, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5882, "no_votes": 2613, "total_votes": 8495, "percent_yes": 69.240729841083, "percent_no": 30.759270158917005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing 8% utility users' tax in Hercules, Californi...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing 8% utility users' tax in Hercules, California, generating approximately $3.6 million annually for general city services including police patrols, water quality standards, and community services. The measure maintained the current tax rate with no increase and included low-income exemptions and oversight provisions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.107672", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.675720", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2258, "fingerprint": "2022|202200125|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200125|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "4a8f37c3d5410877", "measure_id": "202200125", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding to maintain and enhance City of Walnut Creek services and facilities, including crime prevention; public safety; disaster preparedness; parks/open space; youth, senior and arts programs; sustainability initiatives; local business support; downtown improvements; replacing aging recreation, aquatics and community facilities at Heather Farm Park; and other important services and facilities, shall the City of Walnut Creek levy a half-cent sales tax, providing approximately $11,000,000 annually for 10 years, requiring annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds benefitting Walnut Creek?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20916, "no_votes": 11237, "total_votes": 32153, "percent_yes": 65.05147264640937, "percent_no": 34.948527353590634, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the City of Walnut Creek to levy a half-cent sales tax...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the City of Walnut Creek to levy a half-cent sales tax for 10 years, generating approximately $11 million annually to fund various city services and facilities including public safety, parks, youth and senior programs, and infrastructure improvements at Heather Farm Park. The measure included requirements for annual audits and independent citizens' oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.112451", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.677132", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2257, "fingerprint": "2022|202200124|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200124|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "450784e7c6489c2a", "measure_id": "202200124", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Ordinance to amend the City of Richmond\u2019s Municipal Code, changing the City\u2019s Rent Ordinance so that the maximum allowable rent increase on rent-controlled units is adjusted to 60 percent of CPI or three percent whichever is lower, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15390, "no_votes": 10780, "total_votes": 26170, "percent_yes": 58.807795185326704, "percent_no": 41.192204814673296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Rent Control", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended Richmond's rent control ordinance to cap annual rent incr...", "summary_text": "The measure amended Richmond's rent control ordinance to cap annual rent increases on rent-controlled units at 60 percent of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or 3 percent, whichever is lower.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.111983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.676975", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2247, "fingerprint": "2022|202200121|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200121|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8f7d8914c4e1842b", "measure_id": "202200121", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the voters adopt the Measure Amending the General Plan to Create a New Open Space Overlay, Apply the Overlay to Designated Areas, and Prohibit More Intensive Uses Without a Vote of the People, Subject to Certain Exceptions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13819, "no_votes": 7680, "total_votes": 21499, "percent_yes": 64.27740825154659, "percent_no": 35.72259174845341, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Open Space", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the General Plan to create a new Open Space Overlay that ...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the General Plan to create a new Open Space Overlay that applies to designated areas and requires voter approval for more intensive land uses, with certain exceptions. The measure passed and establishes additional protections for specified open space areas by requiring public votes before allowing development or other intensive uses.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.105992", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.675263", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2252, "fingerprint": "2022|202200012|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200012|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "390905cef5cd7b3d", "measure_id": "202200012", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to repeal the 2005 Measure Z Special Tax of the Knightsen Town Community Services District to reduce the tax burden on local property owners and because the District has never provided flood control improvements or services, and because a feasibility study determined that providing them would cause expenses to exceed revenues even at the maximum tax rate of $312 per developed parcel and $156 per undeveloped parcel be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 343, "no_votes": 241, "total_votes": 584, "percent_yes": 58.73287671232876, "percent_no": 41.26712328767124, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would repeal the 2005 Measure Z Special Tax imposed by the Knigh...", "summary_text": "This measure would repeal the 2005 Measure Z Special Tax imposed by the Knightsen Town Community Services District, which charged up to $312 per developed parcel and $156 per undeveloped parcel for flood control improvements and services. The district had not provided the intended flood control services, and a feasibility study found that doing so would cost more than the tax revenues generated.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.108707", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.676034", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2260, "fingerprint": "2022|202200126|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200126|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "c45fc46038bb3948", "measure_id": "202200126", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "DEL NORTE Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to eliminate the one percent sales tax approved by city voters in 2020 (Measure S), which applies within the City of Crescent City, thereby reducing funding available for general city services such as street maintenance/repair, the volunteer fire department, the Crescent City Police Department, the community pool, and other services, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 199, "no_votes": 697, "total_votes": 896, "percent_yes": 22.209821428571427, "percent_no": 77.79017857142857, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have eliminated the 1% sales tax that Crescent City voters...", "summary_text": "This measure would have eliminated the 1% sales tax that Crescent City voters approved in 2020, reducing funding for general city services including street maintenance, fire department, police, community pool, and other municipal services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.113411", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.677462", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "DEL NORTE Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2261, "fingerprint": "2022|202200013|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200013|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "6c1521b390bafa0b", "measure_id": "202200013", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "DEL NORTE Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to eliminate the one percent sales tax approved by voters in 2020 (Measure R), which applies in the unincorporated area of Del Norte County (outside the boundaries of Crescent City), thereby reducing funding available for general county services such as street maintenance/repair, code enforcement, law enforcement and emergency response, and other services, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2610, "no_votes": 5857, "total_votes": 8467, "percent_yes": 30.82555804889571, "percent_no": 69.17444195110428, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have eliminated a one percent sales tax in unincorporated ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have eliminated a one percent sales tax in unincorporated Del Norte County that was previously approved by voters in 2020. The tax repeal would have reduced funding for general county services including street maintenance, code enforcement, law enforcement, and emergency response.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.113972", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.677613", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "DEL NORTE Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2268, "fingerprint": "2022|202200016|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200016|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "9aa0e84c75298d58", "measure_id": "202200016", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund emergency medical and fire protection services, shall the measure renewing the existing Fire Special Tax, voter-approved on June 22, 2018, and set annually by the CSD Board, not to exceed $660 per unit, subject to maximum inflation adjustment of 1.5% per year, established as: Unimproved 0.5 unit (currently $320.46); improved 1.0 unit (currently $640.94); SSA Sierra Programs LLC (40 units), annual revenue raised of $205,416.40, for the next four years be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17, "no_votes": 4, "total_votes": 21, "percent_yes": 80.95238095238095, "percent_no": 19.04761904761905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an existing fire special tax in El Dorado County for four...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an existing fire special tax in El Dorado County for four years to fund emergency medical and fire protection services, with rates not exceeding $660 per unit and annual inflation adjustments capped at 1.5%. The tax applies to improved properties at 1.0 unit and unimproved properties at 0.5 unit, with current rates of $640.94 and $320.46 respectively.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.117307", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.678670", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2271, "fingerprint": "2022|202200017|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200017|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "17efb450bf051223", "measure_id": "202200017", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure increasing the maximum annual Voter Approved Special Tax assessed by the Knolls Property Owners Community Services District by $300.00 per parcel per year, such that the total Voter Approved Special Tax may be increased from $300.00 per year to a maximum of $600.00 per parcel per year (+CPI), be adopted? This increase in the Special Tax for Road Work will raise as much as $8,400 annually+CPI, in perpetuity.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25, "no_votes": 20, "total_votes": 45, "percent_yes": 55.55555555555556, "percent_no": 44.44444444444444, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased the maximum annual special tax for the Knol...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased the maximum annual special tax for the Knolls Property Owners Community Services District from $300 to $600 per parcel per year (plus cost-of-living adjustments) to fund road work. The tax increase would have generated up to $8,400 annually in perpetuity for road maintenance and improvements.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.118807", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.679120", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2263, "fingerprint": "2022|202200014|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200014|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "bb26e3a881387a32", "measure_id": "202200014", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an annual special tax in an amount of $600.00 commencing fiscal year 2023/2024, and annually adjusted for cost of living using the California Construction Cost Index until reaching a maximum rate of $1000.00, be imposed annually per parcel of land within the Sundance Trail Road Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2023/2024 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance services and generating a revenue of approximately $24,000.00 for fiscal year 2023/2024 and $40,000 at maximum rate, be adopted to replace the current benefit assessment of $300.00?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41, "no_votes": 15, "total_votes": 56, "percent_yes": 73.21428571428571, "percent_no": 26.785714285714292, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed an annual special tax of $600 per parcel within the Sund...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed an annual special tax of $600 per parcel within the Sundance Trail Road Zone of Benefit in El Dorado County, replacing a previous $300 assessment, with the tax adjusting annually for cost of living up to a maximum of $1,000 and continuing indefinitely. The tax revenue will be used exclusively for road improvements and maintenance services in the designated area.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.114931", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.677911", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2264, "fingerprint": "2022|202200015|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200015|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "6d3b4b1d770dfada", "measure_id": "202200015", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of not more than $350.00 on each parcel of real property within the boundaries of the Zone to be used only for maintenance of drainage facilities commencing upon expiration of the existing special tax and for each of the following nineteen (19) years thereafter and generating an annual revenue of $12,950 each fiscal year, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 9, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Flood Control/Drainage", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an annual special tax of up to $350 per parce...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an annual special tax of up to $350 per parcel for 20 years to fund drainage facility maintenance in a specific zone within El Dorado County, generating approximately $12,950 annually. The tax would have begun after the existing special tax expired.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.115438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.678064", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2275, "fingerprint": "2022|202200127|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200127|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "5c6514b3d1c81b2e", "measure_id": "202200127", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to maintain essential services such as wildfire prevention, safety, snow removal, road repair, youth programs, other general services by converting existing cannabis business fees to a gross receipts tax up to 6% on retail/distribution/manufacturing, $20/square foot of canopy on cultivation, providing approximately $950,000 annually until ended by voters, continuing regulations/limits on cannabis businesses, requiring public spending disclosure, all funds for South Lake Tahoe, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3521, "no_votes": 2072, "total_votes": 5593, "percent_yes": 62.95369211514393, "percent_no": 37.04630788485607, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure converts existing cannabis business fees in South Lake Tahoe to ...", "summary_text": "This measure converts existing cannabis business fees in South Lake Tahoe to a gross receipts tax of up to 6% on retail, distribution, and manufacturing operations, plus $20 per square foot on cultivation canopy. The tax is expected to generate approximately $950,000 annually to fund municipal services including wildfire prevention, road maintenance, and youth programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.120747", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.679732", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2267, "fingerprint": "2022|202200020|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200020|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "812bc46a3e8d172b", "measure_id": "202200020", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the El Dorado Hills Community Services District repeal Resolutions 2019-11 and 2020-11 establishing assessments on the Carson Creek Park Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District #39 for fiscal years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 for the provision of park improvements and maintenance and order a refund to homeowners of any monies currently held by the District that were collected pursuant to those resolutions?\u201d", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1062, "no_votes": 107, "total_votes": 1169, "percent_yes": 90.84687767322498, "percent_no": 9.15312232677502, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure repealed two resolutions that established landscaping and lighti...", "summary_text": "This measure repealed two resolutions that established landscaping and lighting assessments on properties in the Carson Creek Park Assessment District for fiscal years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, and required refunds of collected assessment money to homeowners. The assessments were originally imposed to fund park improvements and maintenance in the El Dorado Hills Community Services District.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.116831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.678512", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2273, "fingerprint": "2022|202200436|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200436|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "33f2b75317f50a7a", "measure_id": "202200436", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; update inadequate electrical systems; and modernize, renovate and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Lake Tahoe Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $107,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $5.7 million annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5133, "no_votes": 4322, "total_votes": 9455, "percent_yes": 54.28873611845584, "percent_no": 45.71126388154416, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Lake Tahoe Unified School District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Lake Tahoe Unified School District to issue $107 million in bonds to repair roofs, update electrical systems, and modernize or construct school facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 3.5 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.119820", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.679418", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2270, "fingerprint": "2022|202200022|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200022|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "d90cf22588b70794", "measure_id": "202200022", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $140.00, with an annual adjustment using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, on each parcel of land within the Highlands Village Lighting Zone of Benefit, commencing fiscal year 2023/2024 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for street and highway lighting operations and maintenance, and generating an annual revenue of $10,920.00, to replace the current benefit assessment of $86.00, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107, "no_votes": 17, "total_votes": 124, "percent_yes": 86.29032258064517, "percent_no": 13.709677419354833, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies an annual special tax of $140 per parcel (adjusted for in...", "summary_text": "This measure levies an annual special tax of $140 per parcel (adjusted for inflation) within the Highlands Village Lighting Zone of Benefit to fund street and highway lighting operations and maintenance, replacing the current $86 assessment. The tax would begin in fiscal year 2023/2024 and continue indefinitely, generating approximately $10,920 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.118311", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.678967", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2274, "fingerprint": "2022|202200024|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200024|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "6e61d180faaa3e46", "measure_id": "202200024", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special tax in an amount of $450.00 on each parcel of land within the Lynx Trail Road Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2023/2024 and continuing for an unlimited duration, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance services and generating an annual revenue of $33,300.00 to replace the current benefit assessment of $300.00, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42, "no_votes": 25, "total_votes": 67, "percent_yes": 62.68656716417911, "percent_no": 37.31343283582089, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have replaced a $300 annual benefit assessment with a $450...", "summary_text": "This measure would have replaced a $300 annual benefit assessment with a $450 annual special tax on each parcel in the Lynx Trail Road Zone of Benefit to fund road improvements and maintenance. The tax would have generated $33,300 annually and continued indefinitely starting in fiscal year 2023/2024.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.120299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.679583", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2269, "fingerprint": "2022|202200021|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200021|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "bf5ae9e9f9c9ee2b", "measure_id": "202200021", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure increasing the per parcel Hickok Road CSD special tax limit from $200 to $400 per year for the first time since 1980, resulting in a maximum annual income of $24,800 for all future years in order to address the inability to maintain the roads with current funds due to the prohibitive cost increases in asphalt, be adopted.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 72, "percent_yes": 62.5, "percent_no": 37.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have doubled the annual special tax limit for the Hickok R...", "summary_text": "This measure would have doubled the annual special tax limit for the Hickok Road Community Services District from $200 to $400 per parcel to fund road maintenance. The increase would have generated a maximum of $24,800 annually for the district to address rising asphalt costs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.117795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.678821", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2272, "fingerprint": "2022|202200023|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200023|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "33e9074cd10b86c3", "measure_id": "202200023", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure increasing the maximum annual Voter Approved Special Tax assessed by the Knolls Property Owners Community Services District by $300.00 per parcel per year, such that the total Voter Approved Special Tax may be increased from $300.00 per year to a maximum of $600.00 per parcel per year (+CPI), be adopted? This increase in the Special Tax or Road Work will raise as much as $8,400 annually+CPI, in perpetuity.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 49, "percent_yes": 75.51020408163265, "percent_no": 24.48979591836735, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases the maximum annual special tax assessed by the Knolls P...", "summary_text": "The measure increases the maximum annual special tax assessed by the Knolls Property Owners Community Services District from $300 to $600 per parcel per year (plus cost-of-living adjustments) for road work. This increase would raise up to $8,400 annually plus inflation adjustments in perpetuity.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.119319", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.679268", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2262, "fingerprint": "2022|202200435|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200435|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "227f5d742707e226", "measure_id": "202200435", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace outdated HVAC systems; shall Black Oak Mine Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $28,900,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $1,496,000 annually at a rate of approximately 3.9 cents per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3279, "no_votes": 3209, "total_votes": 6488, "percent_yes": 50.53945745992602, "percent_no": 49.46054254007398, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Black Oak Mine Unified School District...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Black Oak Mine Unified School District to issue $28,900,000 in bonds to repair roofs, upgrade classrooms and facilities, and replace HVAC systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 3.9 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.114495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.677763", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2265, "fingerprint": "2022|202200018|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200018|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ee191c83d37b7008", "measure_id": "202200018", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "For the sole purpose of maintaining El Dorado County's existing roads in the unincorporated portion of the West Slope, shall an ordinance to Fix Our Roads be adopted to increase the 'hotel/motel' tax rate upon visitors of vacation home rentals, hotels, motels, and similar facilities in the unincorporated portion of the West Slope of the County from 10% to 12% of rent charged to visitors, providing approximately an additional $340,000 annually, with Citizen's Oversight and until repealed?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32616, "no_votes": 38639, "total_votes": 71255, "percent_yes": 45.77362992070732, "percent_no": 54.22637007929268, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.115909", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.678214", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2266, "fingerprint": "2022|202200019|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200019|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "5438f3c459d2c25f", "measure_id": "202200019", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "For the sole purpose of removing snow and maintaining El Dorado County's existing roads in the unincorporated portion of the Tahoe Area, shall an ordinance to Fix Our Roads be adopted to increase the 'hotel/motel' tax rate upon visitors of vacation home rentals, hotels, motels, and similar facilities in the unincorporated portion of the Tahoe Area from 10% to 14% of rent charged to visitors, providing approximately an additional $2,500,000 annually, with Citizen's Oversight and until repealed?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3629, "no_votes": 806, "total_votes": 4435, "percent_yes": 81.82638105975198, "percent_no": 18.17361894024802, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax on hotels, motels, and vac...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax on hotels, motels, and vacation rentals in the unincorporated Tahoe Area of El Dorado County from 10% to 14%. The additional revenue of approximately $2.5 million annually is designated specifically for snow removal and road maintenance in that area.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.116349", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.678362", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2289, "fingerprint": "2022|202200437|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200437|FRESNO", "content_hash": "045966dc2a4229bf", "measure_id": "202200437", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Westside Elementary School District's measure be adopted to issue $4,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $261,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 28, "percent_yes": 92.85714285714286, "percent_no": 7.142857142857139, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Westside Elementary School District to issue $4", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Westside Elementary School District to issue $4.5 million in bonds to repair roofs, make health and safety improvements, and modernize classrooms and school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $261,000 annually until maturity.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.126368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.681896", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2276, "fingerprint": "2022|202200128|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200128|FRESNO", "content_hash": "e671685d3be08458", "measure_id": "202200128", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to maintain and improve public safety services including emergency response times, police protection, neighborhood services, anti-gang and antidrug programs, and provide other City services be adopted to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel bed tax paid by hotel guests) from 10% to 12%, with the 2% increase providing approximately $500,000 annually until ended by voters, subject to publicly available annual audits, with all funds benefitting Clovis residents?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25675, "no_votes": 11245, "total_votes": 36920, "percent_yes": 69.54225352112677, "percent_no": 30.457746478873233, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Fresno's Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel bed tax) from ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Fresno's Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel bed tax) from 10% to 12%, with the 2% increase generating approximately $500,000 annually to fund public safety services, emergency response, police protection, neighborhood services, anti-gang and anti-drug programs, and other city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.121389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.679880", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2280, "fingerprint": "2022|202200026|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200026|FRESNO", "content_hash": "1050162d75e3e3d1", "measure_id": "202200026", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Without raising tax rates, shall an ordinance to repair potholes, keep local roads in good condition; upgrade structurally declining bridges/overpasses; improve highway safety, 911 emergency vehicle access, air quality, public transit services; protect low-cost senior transportation options and create local jobs; be adopted, continuing the voter-approved transportation \u00bd\u00a2 sales tax (established 1986), providing approximately $228,000,000 annually for 30 years; requiring audits, public spending disclosure and local control?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125152, "no_votes": 89892, "total_votes": 215044, "percent_yes": 58.198322203828056, "percent_no": 41.801677796171944, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have continued Fresno's existing half-cent sales tax for t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have continued Fresno's existing half-cent sales tax for transportation projects for another 30 years, generating approximately $228 million annually for road repairs, bridge upgrades, highway safety improvements, and public transit services. The measure would have maintained the current tax rate rather than raising it, with funds subject to audits and public disclosure requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.123606", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.680496", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2285, "fingerprint": "2022|202200440|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200440|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f045fb1a9f8b56c2", "measure_id": "202200440", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of educational facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Orange Center School District\u2019s measure be adopted to issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $353,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 137, "no_votes": 58, "total_votes": 195, "percent_yes": 70.25641025641025, "percent_no": 29.74358974358975, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Orange Center School District to issue $6 million ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Orange Center School District to issue $6 million in bonds to repair roofs, modernize classrooms and facilities, and make health, safety and accessibility improvements to schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $353,000 annually until maturity.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.125182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.681251", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2281, "fingerprint": "2022|202200027|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200027|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f783ac19f8dc7a59", "measure_id": "202200027", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to expand access and opportunities in nursing, agriculture, criminology, engineering/STEM programs; repair/upgrade academic and other campus facilities; provide safe drinking water; provide scholarships for local, low-income students and veterans by establishing a 0.2% sales tax countywide, except for the City of Reedley where the rate would be 0.025%, providing approximately $36,000,000 annually for 20 years with independent oversight, audits, public disclosure, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 101116, "no_votes": 113394, "total_votes": 214510, "percent_yes": 47.13812875856603, "percent_no": 52.86187124143397, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.123965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.680656", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2283, "fingerprint": "2022|202200130|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200130|FRESNO", "content_hash": "59f27bb287ac17fd", "measure_id": "202200130", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure establishing a ten percent (10%) tax and paid by short-term hotel/motel/inn guests only (not by City residents) for maintaining essential City services such as keeping neighborhoods, parks, streets, public areas safe/clean; addressing homelessness, public safety, and other general city services, and generating approximately $40,000.00 annually until ended by voters, with public disclosure and all funds for Kerman only be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1656, "no_votes": 1004, "total_votes": 2660, "percent_yes": 62.255639097744364, "percent_no": 37.744360902255636, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 10% transient occupancy tax on short-term hotel, m...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 10% transient occupancy tax on short-term hotel, motel, and inn guests in Kerman to fund general city services including public safety, homelessness programs, and maintenance of neighborhoods, parks, and streets. The tax is expected to generate approximately $40,000 annually and remains in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.124609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.680957", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2284, "fingerprint": "2022|202200131|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200131|FRESNO", "content_hash": "1860622ec4169d4b", "measure_id": "202200131", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide additional funding for essential City of Mendota services, including, but not limited to, improving parks and roads, shall the measure establishing the Mendota General Transactions and Use Tax of 1.25%, providing approximately $493,498 annually until repealed, subject to publicly available annual audits with all funds benefitting Mendota residents, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 509, "no_votes": 378, "total_votes": 887, "percent_yes": 57.384441939120634, "percent_no": 42.615558060879366, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established a 1", "summary_text": "The measure established a 1.25% general sales tax in Mendota to fund essential city services including parks and roads improvements, generating approximately $493,498 annually. The tax requires annual public audits and continues until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.124880", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.681104", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2287, "fingerprint": "2022|202200442|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200442|FRESNO", "content_hash": "57474d2305623e41", "measure_id": "202200442", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct new classrooms and labs at West Hills College Lemoore for career training in computer sciences, health sciences, nursing and paramedics, and qualify for State matching funds, shall West Hills Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $8.6 million in bonds be adopted with estimated levies of less than 1\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value (raising $727,000 annually through 2039), legal interest rates, annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and no funds used for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 460, "no_votes": 497, "total_votes": 957, "percent_yes": 48.06687565308255, "percent_no": 51.93312434691745, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the West Hills Community College District ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the West Hills Community College District to issue $8.6 million in bonds to construct new classrooms and laboratories at West Hills College Lemoore for career training programs in computer sciences, health sciences, nursing, and paramedics. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than 1 cent per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $727,000 annually through 2039.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.125768", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.681573", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2288, "fingerprint": "2022|202200443|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200443|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f0e8e46686dbaab5", "measure_id": "202200443", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the Firebaugh Center, including updating classroom technology, improving energy efficiency and water conservation, and upgrading campus security shall West Hills Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $25.1 million in short-term bonds be adopted with estimated levies of less than 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value (approximately $1,694,000 annually through 2039), legal interest rates, annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, with all funds spent on local projects and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1670, "no_votes": 1014, "total_votes": 2684, "percent_yes": 62.22056631892697, "percent_no": 37.77943368107303, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the West Hills Community College District to issue $25", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the West Hills Community College District to issue $25.1 million in bonds to fund improvements at the Firebaugh Center, including classroom technology updates, energy efficiency improvements, water conservation measures, and campus security upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $1.7 million annually through 2039.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.126068", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.681733", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2286, "fingerprint": "2022|202200441|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200441|FRESNO", "content_hash": "bd4d4f0c2451d1df", "measure_id": "202200441", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade school safety, security, fire systems, science, engineering, math, vocational classrooms; provide safe drinking water; fix deteriorating gas lines, electrical, roofs, plumbing; remove asbestos/mold; acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment, shall Selma Unified School District's measure authorizing $36,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $60/$100,000 of assessed valuation, raising $2,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring audits/oversight, spending disclosure, all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2802, "no_votes": 2136, "total_votes": 4938, "percent_yes": 56.74362089914945, "percent_no": 43.25637910085055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Selma Unified School District to issue $36 millio...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Selma Unified School District to issue $36 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including safety systems, classroom upgrades, infrastructure repairs, and hazardous material removal. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $2.3 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.125487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.681414", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2282, "fingerprint": "2022|202200129|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200129|FRESNO", "content_hash": "e9d0296f358d7b9c", "measure_id": "202200129", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure establishing a 1/8 percent sales tax providing approximately $19.5 million annually for 20 years to improve facilities and services for Fresno veterans, including affordable housing, job training/placement, and mental/physical healthcare; reduce veteran homelessness; rehabilitate deteriorating Fresno Veterans Memorial Auditorium, VFW/American Legion halls (by removing asbestos and providing disabled accessibility), requiring local use of funds, public spending disclosure, citizen oversight and audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60543, "no_votes": 41514, "total_votes": 102057, "percent_yes": 59.322731414797616, "percent_no": 40.677268585202384, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.124308", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.680809", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2278, "fingerprint": "2022|202200439|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200439|FRESNO", "content_hash": "786b7f3b7c542b5e", "measure_id": "202200439", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund the operational needs of the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District sports facilities and develop a recreation department to promote youth activities including sports, arts, music, and experiences that develop youth into healthy active responsible citizens. Shall the District levy a tax of $48.00 per parcel annually with annual cost of living adjustment, initially raising approximately $234,048 as long as the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District Board oversees the program?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39, "no_votes": 180, "total_votes": 219, "percent_yes": 17.80821917808219, "percent_no": 82.1917808219178, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District to levy an annual $48 parcel tax with cost-of-living adjustments to fund sports facilities operations and develop a recreation department for youth activities including sports, arts, and music. The tax was expected to raise approximately $234,048 annually under oversight of the school district board.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.122623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.680192", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2277, "fingerprint": "2022|202200438|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200438|FRESNO", "content_hash": "fbc6142f85126899", "measure_id": "202200438", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; construct, modernize, and upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; renovate plumbing; improve drinking water; make safety/security improvements; and replace roofs; shall Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $39,200,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,700,000 annually at a projected average rate less than 5 cents per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1751, "no_votes": 1420, "total_votes": 3171, "percent_yes": 55.21917376222012, "percent_no": 44.78082623777988, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District to issue $39,200,000 in bonds to construct, modernize, and upgrade school facilities including classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, drinking water systems, safety/security improvements, and roofs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a projected average rate of less than 5 cents per $100 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.122172", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.680029", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2279, "fingerprint": "2022|202200025|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200025|FRESNO", "content_hash": "1d8b62c0c3b4a73e", "measure_id": "202200025", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Without raising tax rates and to maintain and upgrade humane animal care, basic needs such as food, heating, cooling, and safe habitats; protect threatened and endangered animals; maintain children's and school field trip programs; and keep entrance fees low; shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the voter-approved 1/10th of 1% sales tax, established in 2004, providing approximately $15,000,000 annually for fifteen additional years, and all proceeds exclusively for Fresno Chaffee Zoo?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107218, "no_votes": 22928, "total_votes": 130146, "percent_yes": 82.38286232385167, "percent_no": 17.61713767614833, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Zoos", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continued an existing 0", "summary_text": "This measure continued an existing 0.1% sales tax in Fresno for an additional fifteen years to fund operations at the Fresno Chaffee Zoo, generating approximately $15 million annually for animal care, habitat maintenance, educational programs, and keeping entrance fees affordable.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.123093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.680341", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2295, "fingerprint": "2022|202200028|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200028|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "73f0b02c3e9416b9", "measure_id": "202200028", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue maintaining general County Services, such as 911 emergency response; children\u2019s mental health; rural fire/ambulance; repairing county roads; emergency communications systems; theater/public art; job training; shall an ordinance continuing the County\u2019s existing hotel tax at a new 12% rate (paid only by hotel/lodging guests) adding overnight recreational vehicle parks/private campgrounds, generating approximately $3,080,000 annually until ended by voters, with annual audits/public review, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21249, "no_votes": 12252, "total_votes": 33501, "percent_yes": 63.42795737440673, "percent_no": 36.57204262559327, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues Humboldt County's existing hotel tax at 12% and extend...", "summary_text": "This measure continues Humboldt County's existing hotel tax at 12% and extends it to include overnight recreational vehicle parks and private campgrounds, generating approximately $3,080,000 annually for general county services. The tax is paid by guests staying at hotels, lodging facilities, RV parks, and campgrounds.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.128217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.682797", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2296, "fingerprint": "2022|202200029|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200029|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "55930ecedf359248", "measure_id": "202200029", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue addressing community blight by removing and disposing abandoned, wrecked, or dismantled vehicles, shall the ordinance renewing the associated vehicle registration fee at the rate of $1 per vehicle and $2 for certain commercial vehicles be adopted for ten years, generating $160,000 annually, with all funds used in participating local communities to remove and dispose abandoned vehicles?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26982, "no_votes": 6805, "total_votes": 33787, "percent_yes": 79.85911741202237, "percent_no": 20.14088258797763, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews a vehicle registration fee of $1 per vehicle and $2 for c...", "summary_text": "This measure renews a vehicle registration fee of $1 per vehicle and $2 for certain commercial vehicles for ten years to fund the removal and disposal of abandoned, wrecked, or dismantled vehicles in participating local communities. The fee is expected to generate $160,000 annually for this specific purpose.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.128501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.682958", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2290, "fingerprint": "2022|202200132|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200132|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "1865faaf2618acbd", "measure_id": "202200132", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Arcata continue to impose a three percent (3%) utility users tax on the ordinary use of utility services in the City, including gas, electric, water, wastewater, and communications services; and, continue to impose an electricity users tax at the rate of 45% on residential customers whose electricity usage exceeds 600% over the established Baseline Allowance with a sole exception for households receiving an extended Medical Baseline from the electricity service supplier; automatically terminating in 14 years on November 30, 2036?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3858, "no_votes": 2083, "total_votes": 5941, "percent_yes": 64.93856253156034, "percent_no": 35.061437468439664, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would continue Arcata's 3% utility users tax on gas, electric, w...", "summary_text": "This measure would continue Arcata's 3% utility users tax on gas, electric, water, wastewater, and communications services, and maintain a 45% electricity tax on residential customers whose usage exceeds 600% of the baseline allowance (with a medical exemption). Both taxes would automatically terminate on November 30, 2036.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.126640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.682045", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2291, "fingerprint": "2022|202200133|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200133|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "1dcbc1ba6842dcb5", "measure_id": "202200133", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City of Arcata enact the proposed ordinance entitled: Initiative to Enact Ordinance Requiring That Earth Flag Is Flown at Top of Flagpole? If adopted, this initiative would require the City of Arcata to fly the \"Earth flag\" above all other flags, including the official flags of the United States of America and the State of California, at the top of all City-owned flagpoles.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3051, "no_votes": 2781, "total_votes": 5832, "percent_yes": 52.31481481481482, "percent_no": 47.68518518518518, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative requires the City of Arcata to fly the \"Earth flag\" at the to...", "summary_text": "This initiative requires the City of Arcata to fly the \"Earth flag\" at the top of all city-owned flagpoles, above the flags of the United States and California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.126964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.682193", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2293, "fingerprint": "2022|202200135|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200135|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "de8756503d6260a7", "measure_id": "202200135", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and improve essential public safety services, including police services and nuisance abatement, shall the City of Ferndale measure to levy a three quarter-cent sales tax, raising approximately $104,000 annually, until March 31, 2031, with independent annual audits and all funds remaining in Ferndale, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 438, "no_votes": 316, "total_votes": 754, "percent_yes": 58.09018567639257, "percent_no": 41.90981432360743, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Ferndale to impose a 0", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Ferndale to impose a 0.75% sales tax to fund public safety services including police and nuisance abatement, generating approximately $104,000 annually through March 31, 2031. The measure requires independent annual audits and restricts all funds to remain within Ferndale city limits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.127568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.682489", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2297, "fingerprint": "2022|202200136|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200136|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "2d44e7e3e0a513b8", "measure_id": "202200136", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Rio Dell continue to impose a transaction and use tax at the reduced rate of (0.75%) after expiration of the currently enacted transaction and use tax (which is at 1.00% and set to expire on December 31, 2024), with all proceeds placed in the City's General Fund to be used for any governmental purpose? The tax authorized by this Ordinance is expected to generate $345,000 in annual revenue and, if approved by the voters, will take effect on January 1, 2025, and continue until repealed by the voters.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 491, "no_votes": 444, "total_votes": 935, "percent_yes": 52.51336898395722, "percent_no": 47.48663101604278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would continue Rio Dell's transaction and use tax at a reduced r...", "summary_text": "This measure would continue Rio Dell's transaction and use tax at a reduced rate of 0.75% starting January 1, 2025, after the current 1.00% tax expires on December 31, 2024. The tax is expected to generate $345,000 annually for the city's general fund and would continue until voters repeal it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.128788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.683105", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2298, "fingerprint": "2022|202200137|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200137|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "a90b9cf8e58e1165", "measure_id": "202200137", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and improve essential public safety services, including law enforcement, roads, and essential services, shall the City of Trinidad measure to increase the existing tourist occupancy tax rate from 8% to 12%, raising an approximate additional amount of $65,000 annually; with all funds remaining in Trinidad, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 149, "no_votes": 44, "total_votes": 193, "percent_yes": 77.2020725388601, "percent_no": 22.797927461139906, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Trinidad's transient occupancy tax rate from 8% to 12%...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Trinidad's transient occupancy tax rate from 8% to 12%, generating approximately $65,000 annually for public safety services, law enforcement, roads, and other essential city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.129084", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.683254", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2294, "fingerprint": "2022|202200444|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200444|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "0f41a4486f21ed6b", "measure_id": "202200444", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of educational facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; replace outdated plumbing systems; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Ferndale Unified School District's measure to issue $7,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, raising approximately $461,000 annually while bonds are outstanding averaging 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, with oversight, annual audits and all funds improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 714, "no_votes": 678, "total_votes": 1392, "percent_yes": 51.293103448275865, "percent_no": 48.706896551724135, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Ferndale Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Ferndale Unified School District to issue $7.7 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, technology upgrades, plumbing replacement, and classroom modernization. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising about $461,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.127904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.682641", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2292, "fingerprint": "2022|202200134|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200134|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "eccbc179182cc991", "measure_id": "202200134", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and improve essential City services, including recreation and public safety services, shall the City of Blue Lake measure to levy a one percent sales tax, raising approximately $25,000.00 annually, with independent annual audits and all funds remaining in Blue Lake, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 308, "no_votes": 238, "total_votes": 546, "percent_yes": 56.41025641025641, "percent_no": 43.58974358974359, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of Blue Lake to levy a one percent sales tax...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of Blue Lake to levy a one percent sales tax to fund essential city services including recreation and public safety, generating approximately $25,000 annually. The funds are required to remain within Blue Lake and be subject to independent annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.127259", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.682340", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2305, "fingerprint": "2022|202200446|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200446|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "45fa5a1c1b4fbf4b", "measure_id": "202200446", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update classrooms and school facilities to provide safe, modern and healthy learning environments; provide career/job training facilities including agriculture; improve/construct physical education facilities including gyms/aquatics; shall Imperial Unied School District's measure be adopted authorizing $50,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, raising $2.9 million annually for issued bonds through maturity from rates of approximately 4.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1418, "no_votes": 1395, "total_votes": 2813, "percent_yes": 50.40881621045148, "percent_no": 49.59118378954852, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Imperial Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Imperial Unified School District to issue $50 million in bonds to update classrooms, construct career training and physical education facilities, and improve school infrastructure. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $2.9 million annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.131257", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.684348", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2304, "fingerprint": "2022|202200451|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200451|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "c0ae09f68a8012d0", "measure_id": "202200451", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve Imperial Valley College with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Imperial Community College District\u2019s measure to expand fire, police, health and emergency responder training centers; upgrade science, technology, engineering and math labs; and develop local lithium technology programs be adopted, authorizing $130 million in bonds with legal interest rates, projected levies less than 3\u00a2/ $100 of assessed valuation (raising $6.7 million/ year while bonds are outstanding), annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17066, "no_votes": 11379, "total_votes": 28445, "percent_yes": 59.99648444366321, "percent_no": 40.00351555633679, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Imperial Community College District to issue $130...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Imperial Community College District to issue $130 million in bonds to expand training centers for emergency responders, upgrade STEM laboratories, and develop lithium technology programs at Imperial Valley College. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies projected at less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.130981", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.684184", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2300, "fingerprint": "2022|202200449|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200449|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "945905577943644a", "measure_id": "202200449", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct a new elementary school; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; improve student access to computers and modern technology; construct and modernize outdated classrooms and facilities; shall El Centro Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted to issue $17,505,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, estimated levies of approximately 2.5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, generating on average $1,120,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual reports, no money for salaries and all money improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3919, "no_votes": 2780, "total_votes": 6699, "percent_yes": 58.50126884609643, "percent_no": 41.49873115390357, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the El Centro Elementary School District to issue $17...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the El Centro Elementary School District to issue $17,505,000 in bonds to construct a new elementary school, replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms, modernize facilities, and improve student access to technology. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $1,120,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.129789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.683565", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2306, "fingerprint": "2022|202200452|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200452|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "75f8c67bad8d0ce2", "measure_id": "202200452", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update classrooms and school facilities for safe, healthy learning; increase security/emergency systems; provide career/job training facilities including agricultural; improve/construct P.E. facilities including aquatics; shall Imperial Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $50,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising $2.9 million annually while bonds are outstanding, levying 4.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2299, "no_votes": 2056, "total_votes": 4355, "percent_yes": 52.78989667049368, "percent_no": 47.21010332950632, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized Imperial Unified School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized Imperial Unified School District to issue $50 million in bonds to update classrooms, improve security systems, construct career training facilities, and upgrade PE facilities including aquatics. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $2.9 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.131586", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.684501", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2301, "fingerprint": "2022|202200450|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200450|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "7b8e91beff9bba3f", "measure_id": "202200450", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; improve student access to computers and modern technology; construct new facilities and modernize outdated classrooms and facilities and construct a new elementary school; shall El Centro Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted to issue $17,495,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, estimated levies of approximately 2.5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, generating on average $1,120,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual reports, no money for salaries and all money improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3905, "no_votes": 2783, "total_votes": 6688, "percent_yes": 58.38815789473685, "percent_no": 41.61184210526315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the El Centro Elementary School District to issue $17...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the El Centro Elementary School District to issue $17,495,000 in bonds to replace portable classrooms with permanent facilities, upgrade technology access, modernize existing classrooms, and construct a new elementary school. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $1,120,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.130103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.683725", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2303, "fingerprint": "2022|202200139|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200139|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "0308db3392488ccb", "measure_id": "202200139", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Imperial amend the current Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) paid only by hotel/motel/all other transient occupancies guests visiting the city from 8% to 12%, to support general municipal services such as street and road repair, parks and recreation, police and fire services, providing an estimated $600,000.00 annually, until repealed by voters, all funds benefiting Imperial residents?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2137, "no_votes": 1678, "total_votes": 3815, "percent_yes": 56.01572739187418, "percent_no": 43.98427260812582, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased Imperial's transient occupancy tax from 8% to 12% on ho...", "summary_text": "The measure increased Imperial's transient occupancy tax from 8% to 12% on hotel and motel guests to fund general municipal services including street repair, parks, police, and fire services. The tax increase is estimated to generate approximately $600,000 annually until voters choose to repeal it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.130670", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.684036", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2302, "fingerprint": "2022|202200138|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200138|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "d4cd0f2afcb71fa7", "measure_id": "202200138", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1257, "no_votes": 1257, "total_votes": 2514, "percent_yes": 50.0, "percent_no": 50.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.130373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.683890", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2307, "fingerprint": "2022|202200447|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200447|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "070aa904b8dbf34c", "measure_id": "202200447", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To build a gymnasium at Westmorland Elementary School for school and community use; upgrade outdated heating, ventilation, and electrical systems; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites and equipment, shall the Westmorland Union Elementary School District measure be adopted to issue $3,750,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy approximately 3 cents/$100 assessed value, generating approximately $234,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries, all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 152, "no_votes": 119, "total_votes": 271, "percent_yes": 56.08856088560885, "percent_no": 43.91143911439115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Westmorland Union Elementary School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Westmorland Union Elementary School District to issue $3.75 million in bonds to build a gymnasium at Westmorland Elementary School, upgrade heating/ventilation/electrical systems, and repair or construct classrooms and acquire equipment. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $234,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.131904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.684660", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2299, "fingerprint": "2022|202200445|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200445|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "ae6c0b234191b010", "measure_id": "202200445", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct a new elementary school; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; improve student access to computers and modern technology; construct and modernize outdated classrooms and facilities; shall El Centro Elementary School District's measure be adopted to issue $37,800,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, estimated levies of approximately 4.9\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, generating on average $2,090,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual reports, no money for salaries and all money improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2440, "no_votes": 1862, "total_votes": 4302, "percent_yes": 56.71780567178056, "percent_no": 43.28219432821944, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the El Centro Elementary School District to...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the El Centro Elementary School District to issue $37.8 million in bonds to construct a new elementary school, replace portable classrooms with permanent ones, upgrade technology access, and modernize existing facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of approximately 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $2.09 million annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.129399", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.683405", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2308, "fingerprint": "2022|202200448|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200448|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "bfa617ade4e4f5cd", "measure_id": "202200448", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize/construct school facilities and athletic facilities to improve the quality of education; make health, safety and handicap accessibility improvements; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites and equipment, shall the Westmorland Union Elementary School District measure be adopted to issue $3,750,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy approximately 3 cents/$100 assessed value, generating approximately $234,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits and independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries, all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 149, "no_votes": 119, "total_votes": 268, "percent_yes": 55.59701492537313, "percent_no": 44.40298507462687, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Westmorland Union Elementary School District to is...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Westmorland Union Elementary School District to issue $3,750,000 in bonds to modernize and construct school and athletic facilities, make health and safety improvements, and acquire classrooms, sites and equipment. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $234,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.132176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.684821", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2309, "fingerprint": "2022|202200030|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200030|INYO", "content_hash": "0ddb19752f81c00d", "measure_id": "202200030", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "INYO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax Equal Share Act Ordinance, which will authorize ongoing collection of a Transient Occupancy Tax on all short-term rental activities within the unincorporated area of the County at the same rate of twelve percent of the rent charged by the operator as currently collected by hotels, estimated to raise an additional $135,000 annually, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3292, "no_votes": 3754, "total_votes": 7046, "percent_yes": 46.721544138518304, "percent_no": 53.278455861481696, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized a 12% transient occupancy tax on short-term...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized a 12% transient occupancy tax on short-term rentals in unincorporated Inyo County, matching the rate already applied to hotels. The tax was estimated to generate approximately $135,000 in additional annual revenue for the county.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.132461", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.684973", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "INYO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2320, "fingerprint": "2022|202200453|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200453|KERN", "content_hash": "b303d66d452c5728", "measure_id": "202200453", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve and repair facilities at Boron Schools, enhance student safety/security systems, acquire/construct/renovate District facilities, classrooms, and equipment, update heating/ air conditioning systems, make health/safety improvements, and improve student access to technology, shall this Muroc Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $21,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying 4.9\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value (averaging $1,140,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight and NO money for administrative salaries?\u00a0", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 300, "no_votes": 189, "total_votes": 489, "percent_yes": 61.34969325153374, "percent_no": 38.65030674846626, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Muroc Joint Unified School District to issue $21 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Muroc Joint Unified School District to issue $21 million in bonds to improve and repair school facilities, update HVAC systems, enhance safety and security systems, and improve technology access. The bonds are funded through a property tax levy of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.137055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.686668", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2323, "fingerprint": "2022|202200454|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200454|KERN", "content_hash": "d94416cb87f90616", "measure_id": "202200454", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update and reconstruct local schools to expand science, technology, engineering, arts and math programs; provide equitable access to modernized classrooms/facilities; improve school safety and energy efficiency; construct and equip classrooms/facilities; shall Sierra Sands Unified School District issue $52,800,000 in bonds, at legal rates, raising an annual average of $2,800,000, at approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, and all funds remaining local?\u00a0", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3013, "no_votes": 4269, "total_votes": 7282, "percent_yes": 41.37599560560285, "percent_no": 58.62400439439715, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Sierra Sands Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Sierra Sands Unified School District to issue $52.8 million in bonds to update and reconstruct school facilities, expand STEAM programs, and improve safety and energy efficiency. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.138450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.687136", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2317, "fingerprint": "2022|202200457|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200457|KERN", "content_hash": "7396a8158af5852c", "measure_id": "202200457", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update local schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Kern High School District's measure to expand vocational training centers; retrofit/construct schools and classrooms including math, science, and engineering labs; and improve classroom security, technology, and internet access be adopted, authorizing $160 million of bonds with legal rates, levies averaging $19/$100,000 of assessed valuation (averaging $16 million/year through 2038), annual audits, independent citizen oversight and no increase in current taxes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75067, "no_votes": 58842, "total_votes": 133909, "percent_yes": 56.05821864101741, "percent_no": 43.94178135898259, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Kern High School District to issue $160 million in bo...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Kern High School District to issue $160 million in bonds to expand vocational training centers, retrofit and construct schools and classrooms including science labs, and improve classroom security and technology. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging $19 per $100,000 of assessed valuation through 2038.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.135629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.686220", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2313, "fingerprint": "2022|202200455|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200455|KERN", "content_hash": "a1d6476fe38e6d51", "measure_id": "202200455", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize and upgrade outdated District facilities, construct new District facilities, including joint-use fields, a community services center for District and community use, a new school site, and qualify for state funding, shall Edison School District issue $3,400,000 in bonds, at legal rates, raising an annual average of $263,000 at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, and all funds remaining local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 557, "no_votes": 307, "total_votes": 864, "percent_yes": 64.4675925925926, "percent_no": 35.532407407407405, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Edison School District to issue $3", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Edison School District to issue $3.4 million in bonds to modernize existing facilities and construct new facilities including joint-use fields, a community services center, and a new school site. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.133692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.685591", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2314, "fingerprint": "2022|202200456|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200456|KERN", "content_hash": "1cc39303ffbe2b83", "measure_id": "202200456", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair aging classrooms and school facilities, including labs and technology; improve student safety and campus security; and provide students access to the education needed to succeed, shall the Fruitvale School District's measure to issue $23,000,000 bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average $1,400,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all money locally controlled be approved?\u00a0\u00a0", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3304, "no_votes": 2947, "total_votes": 6251, "percent_yes": 52.8555431131019, "percent_no": 47.1444568868981, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Fruitvale School District to issue $23...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Fruitvale School District to issue $23 million in bonds to repair aging classrooms and school facilities, improve safety and security, and upgrade labs and technology. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.134137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.685742", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2321, "fingerprint": "2022|202200458|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200458|KERN", "content_hash": "fdcfdbe1f4a56264", "measure_id": "202200458", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair deteriorating roofs, electrical and plumbing; improve school safety and security systems; remove asbestos/lead pipes; and construct/equip new classrooms, labs, and facilities to relieve overcrowding and support college/career readiness in science, math, reading, engineering, technology; shall Panama-Buena Vista School District's measure authorizing $99 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($6 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20158, "no_votes": 13633, "total_votes": 33791, "percent_yes": 59.654937705306146, "percent_no": 40.345062294693854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Panama-Buena Vista School District to issue $99 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Panama-Buena Vista School District to issue $99 million in bonds to fund facility repairs, safety improvements, asbestos and lead pipe removal, and construction of new classrooms and labs. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.137513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.686826", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2315, "fingerprint": "2022|202200033|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200033|KERN", "content_hash": "fcdf4c638900001b", "measure_id": "202200033", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure limiting members of the Kern County Board of Supervisors to serving a maximum of two four-year terms, which applies prospectively so that any current or former supervisor is prohibited from serving more than two additional terms, and which may only be amended by a majority vote of the Kern County voter be adopted?\u00a0\u00a0", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 129296, "no_votes": 54369, "total_votes": 183665, "percent_yes": 70.39773500666975, "percent_no": 29.60226499333025, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure limits Kern County Board of Supervisors members to serving a max...", "summary_text": "This measure limits Kern County Board of Supervisors members to serving a maximum of two four-year terms, applying prospectively so current or former supervisors can serve no more than two additional terms. The term limits can only be changed by a majority vote of county voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.134670", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.685909", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2316, "fingerprint": "2022|202200034|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200034|KERN", "content_hash": "50acaf61b4d30ece", "measure_id": "202200034", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain vital local services such as law enforcement, fire, medical emergency 911 response; crime prevention; recruiting/retaining firefighters/sheriff deputies; attracting industries/jobs; addressing mental health/addiction challenges; for general government use; shall the measure be adopted establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax in unincorporated Kern County, providing approximately $54,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, oversight/public spending disclosures, and no money for the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33849, "no_votes": 32554, "total_votes": 66403, "percent_yes": 50.97510654639098, "percent_no": 49.02489345360902, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in unincorporated Kern County to ...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in unincorporated Kern County to generate approximately $54 million annually for general government services including law enforcement, fire protection, emergency response, and mental health programs. The tax requires audits and public oversight, with funds designated for local use only and continuing until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.135180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.686064", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2310, "fingerprint": "2022|202200140|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200140|KERN", "content_hash": "8f506a79df135d48", "measure_id": "202200140", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Bakersfield City Charter be amended to remove all requirements that the Fire Chief and Police Chief be appointed from within their respective Departments?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45050, "no_votes": 40848, "total_votes": 85898, "percent_yes": 52.44592423572144, "percent_no": 47.55407576427856, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment removes the requirement that Bakersfield's Fire Chief ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment removes the requirement that Bakersfield's Fire Chief and Police Chief be appointed from within their respective departments. It allows the city to hire these leadership positions from outside candidates rather than only promoting from within.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.132813", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.685121", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2318, "fingerprint": "2022|202200141|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200141|KERN", "content_hash": "8b9f823e61cb0663", "measure_id": "202200141", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding for essential city services and projects in the City of McFarland such as: police patrols, crime prevention, and quick 9-1-1 emergency response; fire service; repairing roads, potholes and infrastructure, maintaining streets, revitalizing the downtown area, and improving community facilities, parks, senior services, and other general city services, shall the measure establishing a one percent sales tax providing approximately $579,662 annually until ended by voters, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, and all funds controlled locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 879, "no_votes": 537, "total_votes": 1416, "percent_yes": 62.07627118644068, "percent_no": 37.92372881355932, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a one percent sales tax in the City of McFarland to ...", "summary_text": "This measure established a one percent sales tax in the City of McFarland to fund general city services including police, fire, road repairs, parks, and other municipal services, generating approximately $579,662 annually. The tax includes provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits, and can only be ended by voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.136102", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.686368", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2319, "fingerprint": "2022|202200142|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200142|KERN", "content_hash": "c9d5916819f49abf", "measure_id": "202200142", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure to improve city services, including police, fire/emergency, parks, youth/senior services, homeless community outreach and street repair, by enacting a tax on cannabis businesses of up to $10.00 per square foot for cultivation, 8% of gross receipts for retail, 2.5% of gross receipts for testing labs, and 6% of gross receipts for other cannabis businesses, until terminated by voters, provided such businesses are permitted in the future, generating up to approximately $1.8 million annually, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 861, "no_votes": 493, "total_votes": 1354, "percent_yes": 63.58936484490398, "percent_no": 36.41063515509602, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a business tax on cannabis operations in Kern, Californi...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a business tax on cannabis operations in Kern, California, with rates of up to $10 per square foot for cultivation, 8% of gross receipts for retail, 2.5% for testing labs, and 6% for other cannabis businesses. The tax would generate approximately $1.8 million annually for city services including police, fire, parks, and street repair, contingent on cannabis businesses being permitted in the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.136578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.686519", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2322, "fingerprint": "2022|202200143|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200143|KERN", "content_hash": "84e143fd680796cb", "measure_id": "202200143", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding, that cannot be taken by the State, for maintaining services, such as fire services/keeping both fire stations open full-time; 911 response times; replacing Pinney pool; emergency medical response; pothole/street repair; recreation programs for all; other city services; shall the City of Ridgecrest measure be adopted levying a 1\u00a2 sales tax, ending in 9 years, providing $5,900,000 annually, requiring all funds stay local, independent citizens' oversight/annual audits?\u00a0\u00a0", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4641, "no_votes": 3763, "total_votes": 8404, "percent_yes": 55.22370299857211, "percent_no": 44.77629700142789, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a 1-cent sales tax in Ridgecrest, California for 9 years...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a 1-cent sales tax in Ridgecrest, California for 9 years to fund city services including fire stations, emergency response, street repairs, recreation programs, and pool replacement, generating approximately $5.9 million annually. The measure includes provisions requiring funds to remain local and establishes independent oversight with annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.137995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.686975", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2324, "fingerprint": "2022|202200144|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200144|KERN", "content_hash": "71c157d0771369bf", "measure_id": "202200144", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 853, "no_votes": 711, "total_votes": 1564, "percent_yes": 54.53964194373402, "percent_no": 45.46035805626598, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would change the City Clerk position in Kern, California from an...", "summary_text": "This measure would change the City Clerk position in Kern, California from an elected office to one that is appointed by the city government.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.138912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.687294", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2325, "fingerprint": "2022|202200145|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200145|KERN", "content_hash": "70f3702bdbf41290", "measure_id": "202200145", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect Tehachapi's financial stability/maintain general City services such as fire protection, local 9-1-1 response, crime prevention; protect drinking water; prepare for/respond to natural disasters, earthquakes/fires; help retain businesses/jobs; repair streets/potholes, keep public areas safe/clean; shall an ordinance establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $4,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring spending disclosure, funds controlled locally/no money for Sacramento, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1570, "no_votes": 1121, "total_votes": 2691, "percent_yes": 58.342623560014864, "percent_no": 41.657376439985136, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Tehachapi to generate approxim...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in Tehachapi to generate approximately $4 million annually for general city services including fire protection, emergency response, infrastructure maintenance, and public safety. The tax continues until ended by voters and includes spending disclosure requirements with funds remaining under local control.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.139395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.687440", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2326, "fingerprint": "2022|202200146|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200146|KERN", "content_hash": "47c61664ef96b66d", "measure_id": "202200146", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1294, "no_votes": 1159, "total_votes": 2453, "percent_yes": 52.751732572360375, "percent_no": 47.248267427639625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would change the City Clerk position in Kern, California from an...", "summary_text": "This measure would change the City Clerk position in Kern, California from an elected office to one appointed by city officials. The measure passed, making the City Clerk an appointive rather than elected position.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.139831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.687716", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2327, "fingerprint": "2022|202200147|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200147|KERN", "content_hash": "dc3873ffa2ef79d5", "measure_id": "202200147", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1248, "no_votes": 1175, "total_votes": 2423, "percent_yes": 51.50639702847709, "percent_no": 48.49360297152291, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would change the City Treasurer position in Kern, California fro...", "summary_text": "This measure would change the City Treasurer position in Kern, California from an elected office to one appointed by city officials. The measure passed, making the City Treasurer an appointive rather than elected position.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.140277", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.687893", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2311, "fingerprint": "2022|202200031|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200031|KERN", "content_hash": "8d049ae1d4b4c6db", "measure_id": "202200031", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Gate Operations Special Tax Ordinance imposing a flat tax on each parcel of real property within the Bear Valley Community Services District at a maximum rate of $185 per parcel, per year, and with an annual inflationary adjustment not to exceed two percent (2%) per year for the purpose of paying gate personnel, administration and operational costs, including the cost of associated gate equipment and facilities, which is estimated to generate $665,000 annually until amended or repealed, with regular financial audits, be adopted?\u00a0\u00a0", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1473, "no_votes": 1674, "total_votes": 3147, "percent_yes": 46.80648236415634, "percent_no": 53.19351763584366, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a flat tax of up to $185 per parcel annually o...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a flat tax of up to $185 per parcel annually on property within the Bear Valley Community Services District, with up to 2% annual inflation adjustments, to fund gate personnel, administration, operations, and associated equipment and facilities. The tax was estimated to generate $665,000 annually until amended or repealed.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.133090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.685270", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2312, "fingerprint": "2022|202200032|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200032|KERN", "content_hash": "8c5cfe8fc5e8c12c", "measure_id": "202200032", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Police Services Special Tax Ordinance imposing a flat tax on each parcel of real property within the Bear Valley Community Services District at a maximum rate of $500 per parcel, per year, and with an annual inflationary adjustment not to exceed two percent (2%) per year for the purpose of paying Bear Valley Police Department personnel, administration and operational costs, including the costs of associated Police Department equipment, supplies, and support facilities, which is estimated to generate $1,800,000 annually until amended or repealed, with regular financial audits, be adopted?\u00a0\u00a0", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1334, "no_votes": 1818, "total_votes": 3152, "percent_yes": 42.32233502538071, "percent_no": 57.67766497461929, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an annual special tax of up to $500 per prope...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an annual special tax of up to $500 per property parcel within the Bear Valley Community Services District to fund police department personnel, operations, equipment, and facilities, with annual adjustments up to 2% for inflation. The tax was estimated to generate approximately $1.8 million annually until amended or repealed.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.133385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.685431", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2328, "fingerprint": "2022|202200148|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200148|KINGS", "content_hash": "890ca327cc368526", "measure_id": "202200148", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve the safety and character of Avenal, and maintain essential general City services for Avenal residents including police, 911 emergency response, fire protection, disaster preparedness, recreational programs and facilities, park maintenance and improvements, street maintenance and repairs and other essential services, shall Ordinance No. 2022-04, imposing a 1-cent general sales and and use tax, be adopted? Estimated revenues between $400,000 and $500,000 annually, indefinitely.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 482, "no_votes": 182, "total_votes": 664, "percent_yes": 72.59036144578313, "percent_no": 27.40963855421687, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a 1-cent general sales and use tax in Avenal, California...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a 1-cent general sales and use tax in Avenal, California to fund various city services including police, fire protection, emergency response, parks, street maintenance, and recreational programs. The tax was estimated to generate $400,000 to $500,000 annually with no expiration date.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.140732", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.688049", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2329, "fingerprint": "2022|202200149|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200149|KINGS", "content_hash": "4cc5fc55e0e6998b", "measure_id": "202200149", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance 2022-05 be adopted authorizing a commercial cannabis business tax in the City of Avenal on commercial cannabis businesses up to $25 per square foot (annually adjusted by CPI) or at 15% of gross receipts, to maintain essential public safety and general City services including, but not limited to, police, drug addiction and gang prevention, park maintenance, street maintenance for Avenal residents, generating undetermined revenue, potentially up to $400,000 to $600,000 annually until repealed?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 408, "no_votes": 254, "total_votes": 662, "percent_yes": 61.631419939577036, "percent_no": 38.368580060422964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Avenal to impose a business tax on commer...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Avenal to impose a business tax on commercial cannabis operations at up to $25 per square foot (adjusted annually for inflation) or 15% of gross receipts. The tax revenue would fund public safety and general city services including police, drug prevention programs, and infrastructure maintenance, with estimated annual revenue of $400,000 to $600,000.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.141277", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.688203", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2330, "fingerprint": "2022|202200035|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200035|KINGS", "content_hash": "d9c2b2b114a3e28d", "measure_id": "202200035", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Kings County Fire and Emergency Services .5 percent Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance be adopted? The tax is anticipated to permanently generate an approximate $11,700,000 per year. Tax proceeds would be used exclusively to support the personnel, infrastructure and equipment needs of the Kings County Fire Department.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6170, "no_votes": 11097, "total_votes": 17267, "percent_yes": 35.732900909248855, "percent_no": 64.26709909075115, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.141715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.688358", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2332, "fingerprint": "2022|202200460|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200460|KINGS", "content_hash": "9ffa925ca584b33c", "measure_id": "202200460", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct new classrooms and labs at West Hills College Lemoore for career training in computer sciences, health sciences, nursing and paramedics, and qualify for State matching funds, shall West Hills Community College District's measure authorizing $8.6 million in bonds be adopted with estimated levies of less than 1 \u00a2 per $100 of assessed value (raising $727,000 annually through 2039), legal interest rates, annual audits, citizens' oversight, and no funds used for administrators' salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3778, "no_votes": 4107, "total_votes": 7885, "percent_yes": 47.913760304375394, "percent_no": 52.086239695624606, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the West Hills Community College District ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the West Hills Community College District to issue $8.6 million in bonds to construct new classrooms and laboratories at West Hills College Lemoore for career training programs in computer sciences, health sciences, nursing, and paramedics. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of less than 1 cent per $100 of assessed value, raising approximately $727,000 annually through 2039.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.142680", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.688670", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2331, "fingerprint": "2022|202200459|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200459|KINGS", "content_hash": "b967bc6090ce901a", "measure_id": "202200459", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KINGS Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of educational facilities; provide additional science, technology, engineering, and math labs/ classrooms; construct/ modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health/ safety improvements; shall Kings River-Hardwick Elementary School District's measure be adopted to issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $243,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 373, "no_votes": 526, "total_votes": 899, "percent_yes": 41.490545050055616, "percent_no": 58.509454949944384, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Kings River-Hardwick Elementary School...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Kings River-Hardwick Elementary School District to issue $4 million in bonds to construct and modernize educational facilities, including science and math labs, classrooms, and restrooms, while making health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.142196", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.688514", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KINGS Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2333, "fingerprint": "2022|202200150|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200150|LAKE", "content_hash": "894e64b424f11116", "measure_id": "202200150", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LAKE Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the order adopted on March 30, 2022, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Lake County ordering the annexation to the City of Lakeport of the territory described in that order and designated \u201cCity of Lakeport Annexation to the City of Lakeport (LAFCO file 2019-0006) (South Lakeport Annexation)\u201d be confirmed?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 14, "percent_yes": 14.285714285714285, "percent_no": 85.71428571428572, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Incorporation/Formation/Annexation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.143134", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.688835", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LAKE Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2335, "fingerprint": "2022|202200151|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200151|LASSEN", "content_hash": "ebb964165125b8ae", "measure_id": "202200151", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LASSEN Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall city of Susanville Measure P establishing a one-cent sales tax be adopted, providing $1.75 million annually for city services until ended by voters and requiring a citizen oversight committee?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1076, "no_votes": 891, "total_votes": 1967, "percent_yes": 54.70259278088459, "percent_no": 45.29740721911541, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "Measure P establishes a one-cent sales tax in Susanville to generate approxim...", "summary_text": "Measure P establishes a one-cent sales tax in Susanville to generate approximately $1.75 million annually for city services, with the tax continuing until voters decide to end it and requiring oversight by a citizen committee.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.144266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.689200", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LASSEN Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2336, "fingerprint": "2022|202200152|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200152|LASSEN", "content_hash": "a4cf6c5ed0fdb5ed", "measure_id": "202200152", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LASSEN Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) If Measure P passes, should the revenues be used to balance the budget to maintain and enhance existing public safety services (police and fire), and provide funding to support street infrastructure improvements, and provide funding to support economic development efforts designed to increase businesses, jobs, and visitors to Susanville?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1481, "no_votes": 457, "total_votes": 1938, "percent_yes": 76.41898864809082, "percent_no": 23.581011351909183, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.144705", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.689351", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LASSEN Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2337, "fingerprint": "2022|202200153|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200153|LASSEN", "content_hash": "6b2fad840535fd83", "measure_id": "202200153", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LASSEN Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the city of Susanville's Municipal Code to establish regulations governing commercial cannabis activities in the city of Susanville be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1088, "no_votes": 1731, "total_votes": 2819, "percent_yes": 38.59524654132671, "percent_no": 61.40475345867329, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.145143", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.689504", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LASSEN Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2334, "fingerprint": "2022|202200036|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200036|LASSEN", "content_hash": "3f0f7e5628780aed", "measure_id": "202200036", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LASSEN Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Board of Supervisors of the County of Lassen consider enacting an ordinance for permitting and regulating legally permitted commercial indoor cannabis cultivation sites in the industrially zoned unincorporated areas of Lassen County?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3104, "no_votes": 5921, "total_votes": 9025, "percent_yes": 34.393351800554015, "percent_no": 65.60664819944598, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked whether the Lassen County Board of Supervisors sh...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked whether the Lassen County Board of Supervisors should consider allowing and regulating commercial indoor cannabis cultivation in industrially zoned unincorporated areas of the county. The measure was non-binding and would not have directly changed any laws, only provided guidance to county supervisors on potential future ordinances.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.143595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.688999", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LASSEN Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2409, "fingerprint": "2022|202200171|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200171|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "29531950ecc88b57", "measure_id": "202200171", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure 4", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Zein Obagi, Jr. be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of the Redondo Beach City Council representing District 4?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 875, "no_votes": 2222, "total_votes": 3097, "percent_yes": 28.25314820794317, "percent_no": 71.74685179205683, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-10-19", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.175885", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.702725", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure 4", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11043, "fingerprint": "2022|202200166|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200166|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "18ab47b384a52316", "measure_id": "202200166", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure imposing an annual flat tax of $1,095.00 on each real property parcel within the City of Manhattan Beach, and adjusted annually for inflation, for a period of twelve years, thereby generating an estimated $11,000,000 to $13,000,000 annually for investment in education, with an oversight committee and exemptions for (1) low-income individuals and (2) seniors who use their property as a principal residence, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4352, "no_votes": 9255, "total_votes": 13607, "percent_yes": 31.983537884912177, "percent_no": 68.01646211508782, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an annual $1,095 flat tax on each real proper...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an annual $1,095 flat tax on each real property parcel in Manhattan Beach for twelve years to generate $11-13 million annually for education investment. The tax would have been adjusted for inflation and included exemptions for low-income individuals and seniors using their property as a principal residence.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.260579", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.169063", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.699052", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2383, "fingerprint": "2022|202200037|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200037|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "96345cad9b941ef4", "measure_id": "202200037", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the County of Los Angeles Charter to grant the Board of Supervisors authority to remove an elected Sheriff from office for cause, including violation of law related to a Sheriff's duties, flagrant or repeated neglect of duties, misappropriation of funds, willful falsification of documents, or obstructing an investigation, by a four-fifths vote of the Board of Supervisors, after written notice and an opportunity to be heard, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1633918, "no_votes": 640361, "total_votes": 2274279, "percent_yes": 71.84334024101705, "percent_no": 28.156659758982954, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Los Angeles County Charter to allow the Board of Sup...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Los Angeles County Charter to allow the Board of Supervisors to remove an elected Sheriff from office for specified causes such as violating laws related to their duties, neglecting duties, misappropriating funds, falsifying documents, or obstructing investigations. The removal would require a four-fifths vote of the Board after providing the Sheriff written notice and an opportunity to be heard.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.165082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.697560", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2348, "fingerprint": "2022|202200180|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200180|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bb260bcf2e9e0675", "measure_id": "202200180", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing term limits for Bell Gardens councilmembers where no person may serve more than 3 four-year terms of office cumulatively over the person's lifetime and where service for the unexpired balance of a vacated City Council seat (whether by appointment or election) will also count as service for a full four-year term of office even if such service is for a period that is less than four years in duration?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3256, "no_votes": 553, "total_votes": 3809, "percent_yes": 85.48175374113941, "percent_no": 14.518246258860586, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance establishes term limits for Bell Gardens city councilmembers, ...", "summary_text": "This ordinance establishes term limits for Bell Gardens city councilmembers, restricting individuals to serving no more than 3 four-year terms cumulatively over their lifetime. The measure also specifies that serving any portion of an unexpired term to fill a vacant council seat counts as a full four-year term toward the limit.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.148895", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.691145", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2361, "fingerprint": "2022|202200464|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200464|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a60e07a558d9184f", "measure_id": "202200464", "measure_letter": "AAA", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure AAA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, electrical, and other systems, enhance school safety, and construct, reconstruct, renovate, rehabilitate and modernize classrooms, sites and facilities, including media and performing arts centers, technology centers and athletic complexes, shall Compton Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $0.06 per $100 of assessed valuation ($21,526,770 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with mandatory audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13620, "no_votes": 5728, "total_votes": 19348, "percent_yes": 70.39487285507546, "percent_no": 29.605127144924538, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Compton Unified School District to issue $350 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Compton Unified School District to issue $350 million in bonds to repair deteriorating school infrastructure systems and construct or modernize educational facilities including classrooms, media centers, and athletic complexes. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of $0.06 per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.153176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.693241", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure AAA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2399, "fingerprint": "2022|202200215|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200215|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "be03257321c78281", "measure_id": "202200215", "measure_letter": "AB", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure AB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve 911 response, prevent crime/thefts; protect local drinking water sources; repair streets/potholes; address homelessness; other general City services; shall an ordinance to simplify/update Pico Rivera's 64-year-old business license fee, to protect local small businesses and ensure all businesses operating in the City pay their fair share; with no tax increase on residents, be adopted, generating approximately $5,800,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring City spending disclosure/local control of funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9152, "no_votes": 2966, "total_votes": 12118, "percent_yes": 75.52401386367387, "percent_no": 24.475986136326128, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure updated Pico Rivera's business license fee structure to generate...", "summary_text": "This measure updated Pico Rivera's business license fee structure to generate approximately $5.8 million annually for city services including 911 response, street repairs, crime prevention, and homelessness programs. The ordinance simplified the existing 64-year-old business fee system while requiring spending disclosure and maintaining local control of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.172245", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.700744", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure AB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2359, "fingerprint": "2022|202200184|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200184|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "52733dd023a76949", "measure_id": "202200184", "measure_letter": "AM", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure AM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the Compton City Charter to reduce the number of required monthly regular City Council meetings from four to two be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4292, "no_votes": 7112, "total_votes": 11404, "percent_yes": 37.63591722202736, "percent_no": 62.36408277797264, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended the Compton City Charter to reduce the number ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended the Compton City Charter to reduce the number of required monthly regular City Council meetings from four to two.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.152609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.692935", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure AM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2373, "fingerprint": "2022|202200196|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200196|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d04cd4807db44f22", "measure_id": "202200196", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain Hermosa Beach\u2019s long-term financial stability with locally controlled funds, to be used for programs such as public safety/911 response, enforcement against property crime; street/pothole repair; protection of beach/coastal waters; school safety; cleaning of public areas; retention/attraction of local businesses; homeless services and for general governmental use; shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax requiring public spending disclosure/independent audits, generating approximately $3,000,000 annually until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3712, "no_votes": 4573, "total_votes": 8285, "percent_yes": 44.8038624019312, "percent_no": 55.1961375980688, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a 0.75% sales tax in Hermosa Beach to generate approximately $3 million annually for general city services including public safety, street repair, beach protection, and homeless services, with required public spending disclosure and independent audits. The tax would have remained in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.157295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.695410", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2362, "fingerprint": "2022|202200186|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200186|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ef169e334922f842", "measure_id": "202200186", "measure_letter": "BA", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure BA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To increase funding for parks, recreational programs, roads and sidewalks and other general governmental purposes, shall an ordinance authorizing and regulating storefront retail cannabis sales and other commercial cannabis activities be approved with prohibitions on retail operations within 600 feet of schools, churches, childcare facilities and other sensitive uses and with retailers required to pay a 15% gross receipts tax to raise approximately $3,581,952.75 annually until ended by Cudahy voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 969, "no_votes": 824, "total_votes": 1793, "percent_yes": 54.043502509760174, "percent_no": 45.956497490239826, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized storefront retail cannabis sales and other commercial...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized storefront retail cannabis sales and other commercial cannabis activities in Cudahy with location restrictions including a 600-foot buffer from schools, churches, and childcare facilities. It imposed a 15% gross receipts tax on cannabis retailers, expected to generate approximately $3.58 million annually for parks, recreational programs, roads, sidewalks, and other general government purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.153468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.693403", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure BA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11041, "fingerprint": "2022|202200164|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200164|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0b158b6a28a66396", "measure_id": "202200164", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to allow the City, on a competitive bid contract, to award a bid preference to a bidder located in the City of Los Angeles?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 373956, "no_votes": 178665, "total_votes": 552621, "percent_yes": 67.66952395945866, "percent_no": 32.33047604054134, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Contracting/Bidding/Leasing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment allows the City of Los Angeles to give preferential tr...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment allows the City of Los Angeles to give preferential treatment to local bidders when awarding competitive bid contracts. The measure enables the city to factor in a bidder's Los Angeles location as an advantage in the contract selection process.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.259081", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.165675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.697857", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2379, "fingerprint": "2022|202200202|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200202|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "43137dc5b0a5f52f", "measure_id": "202200202", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to merge the existing water, sewer and gas utilities into a single publicly-owned utility, governed by the existing independent Water/Utility Commission; eliminate duplicative costs by consolidating like operations, improve customer service efficiency with increased flexibility in sharing of staffing/equipment, reduce impacts to streets through coordinated utility pipeline street repairs; and achieve cost savings through greater economies of scale?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68557, "no_votes": 38707, "total_votes": 107264, "percent_yes": 63.91426760143199, "percent_no": 36.08573239856801, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "General Services: Water", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to merge the city's separate...", "summary_text": "The measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to merge the city's separate water, sewer, and gas utilities into a single publicly-owned utility under the governance of the existing Water/Utility Commission. The consolidation was intended to eliminate operational duplication, improve service efficiency, and achieve cost savings through combined operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.162400", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.696818", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2363, "fingerprint": "2022|202200187|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200187|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8c1584ec4c34a971", "measure_id": "202200187", "measure_letter": "BL", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure BL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure updating Culver City\u2019s business license tax to either a flat tax up to $1,000, or 0.13%-0.35% of gross receipts (depending on business type), 4% for oil well operations, and an additional 0.01% for gross receipts over $100,000,000, exempting the first $200,000 in gross receipts, updating business classifications, generating approximately $10,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, for such general fund services as emergency response, parks, homelessness services, and requiring annual independent audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9770, "no_votes": 6273, "total_votes": 16043, "percent_yes": 60.89883438259677, "percent_no": 39.10116561740323, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure updated Culver City's business license tax structure to include ...", "summary_text": "This measure updated Culver City's business license tax structure to include either flat fees up to $1,000 or percentage-based taxes on gross receipts ranging from 0.13%-0.35% depending on business type, with higher rates for oil operations and large businesses, while exempting the first $200,000 in receipts. The measure was projected to generate approximately $10 million annually for general city services and requires annual independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.153780", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.693553", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure BL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2343, "fingerprint": "2022|202200175|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200175|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2734b36375749280", "measure_id": "202200175", "measure_letter": "BP", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure BP", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund Baldwin Park services, including keeping public parks and facilities safe and clean; street maintenance and traffic management; prioritize police response for schools, enhance gang and crime prevention; improve senior, youth, and job programs; shall an ordinance establishing a \u00be cent sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 6 million dollars annually for general government use in Baldwin Park until ended by voters, with annual audits, stakeholders oversight committee, no funds to LA, all funds for Baldwin Park?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6036, "no_votes": 4299, "total_votes": 10335, "percent_yes": 58.40348330914369, "percent_no": 41.59651669085631, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in Baldwin Park to generate approximately $6 million annually for general government services including parks, street maintenance, police response, and various community programs. The tax continues until ended by voters and includes annual audits and oversight committee requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.147467", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.690397", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure BP", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2369, "fingerprint": "2022|202200192|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200192|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c73258d374bb5cdb", "measure_id": "202200192", "measure_letter": "BT", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure BT", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance amending businesses taxes, including: $150 for specified businesses; for others, $150 up to five employees, $138 per additional employee, and $0.26 to $0.30 per square foot above 2,000 square feet; for apartments and hotels or motels, $150 up to three units or rooms plus $150 for each additional; sunsetting current tax credits; generating approximately $3,000,000 annually for public safety, maintaining parks and streets, and other general purposes, until repealed, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3495, "no_votes": 3327, "total_votes": 6822, "percent_yes": 51.23131046613896, "percent_no": 48.76868953386104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This Los Angeles ballot measure amended business taxes to implement a tiered ...", "summary_text": "This Los Angeles ballot measure amended business taxes to implement a tiered structure with a base $150 fee and additional charges based on employees, square footage, or units/rooms depending on business type, while eliminating existing tax credits. The measure was projected to generate approximately $3 million annually for general city services including public safety, parks, and street maintenance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.155771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.694640", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure BT", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2384, "fingerprint": "2022|202200038|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200038|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1265fbac68e699e9", "measure_id": "202200038", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure enacting a tax in the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County on cannabis businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10 per square foot for cultivation (adjusted for inflation) and a percentage of gross receipts for various cannabis businesses, including retail (6 percent), testing laboratory (2 percent), distribution (3 percent), manufacturing and for all other cannabis businesses (4 percent), generating approximately $10,360,000 to $15,170,000 annually, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1323160, "no_votes": 875617, "total_votes": 2198777, "percent_yes": 60.17708935467307, "percent_no": 39.82291064532693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a tax on cannabis businesses in unincorporated areas of ...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a tax on cannabis businesses in unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, with rates up to $10 per square foot for cultivation and percentage-based taxes on gross receipts ranging from 2-6% depending on business type. The tax was projected to generate approximately $10.4 to $15.2 million annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.165377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.697708", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2338, "fingerprint": "2022|202200172|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200172|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "709a97cd82281f34", "measure_id": "202200172", "measure_letter": "CA", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide for election of City Councilmembers by-district, to set the general municipal election for the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November in even-numbered years to align with the Statewide General Election date, to amend the procedure to fill vacant elective offices, to change the City Clerk from elected to appointed, to establish a City Prosecutor, to modify City procurement procedures, and to make other modernizing amendments?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9052, "no_votes": 4496, "total_votes": 13548, "percent_yes": 66.8142899320933, "percent_no": 33.1857100679067, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment changed Los Angeles city elections to by-district voti...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment changed Los Angeles city elections to by-district voting for City Council members, moved municipal elections to November of even-numbered years to align with state elections, and made the City Clerk an appointed rather than elected position. It also established a City Prosecutor position, modified procurement procedures, and updated procedures for filling vacant elected offices.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.145645", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.689653", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2344, "fingerprint": "2022|202200176|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200176|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3076cca3afed0662", "measure_id": "202200176", "measure_letter": "CB", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure authorizing cannabis retailers to sell and deliver medical cannabis and cannabis products to adults, and adult-use cannabis and cannabis products to persons 21 years and older, with retailers paying a 0.5% tax and 4% tax on gross receipts from sales, respectively, providing $300,000 to $3 million annually for general government use, and authorizing City Council to modify rates up to 5%, until repealed by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5268, "no_votes": 4996, "total_votes": 10264, "percent_yes": 51.32501948558067, "percent_no": 48.67498051441933, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized cannabis retailers in Los Angeles to sell and deliver...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized cannabis retailers in Los Angeles to sell and deliver both medical and adult-use cannabis products, while imposing a 0.5% tax on medical cannabis sales and a 4% tax on adult-use cannabis sales. The measure also gave the City Council authority to modify tax rates up to 5% and was projected to generate $300,000 to $3 million annually for general government purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.147758", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.690558", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11048, "fingerprint": "2022|202200168|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200168|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0949a474326e2905", "measure_id": "202200168", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2458, "no_votes": 3333, "total_votes": 5791, "percent_yes": 42.44517354515628, "percent_no": 57.55482645484372, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.267534", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.179943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.704917", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2356, "fingerprint": "2022|202200463|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200463|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "08416c6c8f17ca55", "measure_id": "202200463", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair, upgrade, and replace instructional, training, and support facilities; remove asbestos/ lead paint; maintain safe drinking water; earthquake/fire safety; prepare local workforce, students/veterans with modern job training and university transfer; acquire equipment, facilities, sites, shall Cerritos Community College District's measure authorizing $425,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25/$100,000 assessed valuation, raising $19,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring independent audits/ public disclosure of spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51606, "no_votes": 37994, "total_votes": 89600, "percent_yes": 57.59598214285714, "percent_no": 42.40401785714286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Cerritos Community College District to issue $425...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Cerritos Community College District to issue $425 million in bonds to repair, upgrade, and replace educational facilities, improve safety systems, and acquire equipment and sites. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $19 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.151621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.692490", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2421, "fingerprint": "2022|202200236|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200236|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7c80ff9815e973fe", "measure_id": "202200236", "measure_letter": "CM", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, permitting and thoroughly regulating limited cannabis retail businesses (1 adult-use/medical with option of up to 3 total after the measure\u2019s 1st year), establishing a general tax at a maximum 8% of noncultivation cannabis business proceeds and $25/square foot of cultivation space (with CPI increases) applicable to permitted/unpermitted businesses, generating approximately $720,000 annually until ended by voters, for general City services (e.g., police, maintenance), be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1336, "no_votes": 1156, "total_votes": 2492, "percent_yes": 53.6115569823435, "percent_no": 46.3884430176565, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure permits limited cannabis retail businesses in Los Angeles and es...", "summary_text": "This measure permits limited cannabis retail businesses in Los Angeles and establishes a general tax of up to 8% on cannabis business proceeds plus $25 per square foot of cultivation space to fund general city services. The measure allows one adult-use/medical cannabis retailer initially with the option to expand to three total retailers after the first year, generating an estimated $720,000 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.179338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.704596", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2345, "fingerprint": "2022|202200177|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200177|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "db90f4fa32cd3238", "measure_id": "202200177", "measure_letter": "CN", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CN", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall City of Baldwin Park City Council Ordinance No. 1468, establishing campaign contribution limits and penalties lowering the maximum contribution from an individual or political action committee to $750 per candidate/PAC per election cycle be adopted by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7485, "no_votes": 2403, "total_votes": 9888, "percent_yes": 75.69781553398059, "percent_no": 24.302184466019412, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes campaign contribution limits in Baldwin Park, lowerin...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes campaign contribution limits in Baldwin Park, lowering the maximum contribution from individuals or political action committees to $750 per candidate or PAC per election cycle and creating penalties for violations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.148058", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.690705", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CN", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2411, "fingerprint": "2022|202200227|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200227|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "18d1c92662f5451c", "measure_id": "202200227", "measure_letter": "CS", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To address homelessness, improve 911 emergency response times and neighborhood police protection, make public areas safer and cleaner, including streets, sidewalks, parks, and the beach, and provide other vital City services, shall the City of Santa Monica increase the transient occupancy tax \u2013 which is paid entirely overnight visitors \u2013 by 1% for hotels and motels, and by 3% for homeshares, providing approximately $4.1 million annually, until ended by voters, with all funds benefitting Santa Monica?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27282, "no_votes": 9651, "total_votes": 36933, "percent_yes": 73.86889773373406, "percent_no": 26.13110226626594, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Santa Monica's transient occupancy tax by 1% for hotel...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Santa Monica's transient occupancy tax by 1% for hotels and motels and 3% for homeshares, generating approximately $4.1 million annually. The revenue would fund services including homelessness programs, emergency response, police protection, and maintenance of public areas like streets, parks, and beaches.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.176431", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.703026", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2357, "fingerprint": "2022|202200182|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200182|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2aa662a92068f4ab", "measure_id": "202200182", "measure_letter": "CT", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure CT", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund City services, shall a measure establishing a tax on cannabis and hemp businesses of the following rates: 4%-7% of gross receipts for retail businesses; and the higher of 1 %-4% of gross receipts or $1-$10 per square foot for other businesses, with certain rates increasing annually, generating an estimated $500,000 annually if cannabis and hemp businesses were to be authorized in the future, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8281, "no_votes": 5303, "total_votes": 13584, "percent_yes": 60.96142520612485, "percent_no": 39.03857479387515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a business tax on cannabis and hemp businesses in Lo...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a business tax on cannabis and hemp businesses in Los Angeles, with rates of 4-7% of gross receipts for retail and either 1-4% of gross receipts or $1-10 per square foot for other cannabis businesses. The tax would generate an estimated $500,000 annually to fund city services if cannabis and hemp businesses are authorized in the future.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.151972", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.692639", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure CT", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11035, "fingerprint": "2022|202200189|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200189|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "af7326c3180b872b", "measure_id": "202200189", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to increase the rate of the City's Transient Occupancy (Room) Tax from 9% to 13%, providing approximately $950,000 annually until ended by voters for general government use such as City parks, streets and public safety, and applying the tax to all rent charged to hotel guests, including by online travel and short term rental companies, for transient occupancy of any hotel, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8207, "no_votes": 14743, "total_votes": 22950, "percent_yes": 35.76034858387799, "percent_no": 64.239651416122, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased Los Angeles's transient occupancy tax rate ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased Los Angeles's transient occupancy tax rate from 9% to 13% and applied the tax to all rent charged to hotel guests, including by online travel and short-term rental companies, generating approximately $950,000 annually for general government services. The revenue would have been used for city parks, streets, public safety, and other general government purposes until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.254092", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.154322", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.693880", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2350, "fingerprint": "2022|202200154|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200154|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "27fefbde774758fb", "measure_id": "202200154", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Cerritos City Charter be amended to remove or modify provisions based on superseding and preemptive State law, promote inclusivity through the use of generic personal pronoun references, increase City-wide operational efficiency by eliminating references to outdated business practices, and correct grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5341, "no_votes": 2552, "total_votes": 7893, "percent_yes": 67.66755352844292, "percent_no": 32.33244647155708, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment updated the Cerritos City Charter by removing provisio...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment updated the Cerritos City Charter by removing provisions superseded by state law, replacing gendered pronouns with generic references, eliminating outdated business practice references, and correcting grammatical and spelling errors. The measure passed with 70% voter approval.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-04-12", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.149862", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.691598", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2412, "fingerprint": "2022|202200228|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200228|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4753dcf3315d9db2", "measure_id": "202200228", "measure_letter": "DT", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure DT", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to enhance the City of Santa Monica\u2019s general governmental services by increasing the one-time tax on real property sales over $8 million, and establishing an additional incremental tax of $25.00 per $1000 of the value in excess of $8 million, excepting transfers: per State law, involving tax-exempt charitable organizations, and certain ground leases; providing an estimated $12-25 million annually through February 28, 2033, subject to a five-year extension by Council supermajority vote, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12376, "no_votes": 23413, "total_votes": 35789, "percent_yes": 34.58045768252815, "percent_no": 65.41954231747185, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased the existing one-time tax on real property s...", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased the existing one-time tax on real property sales over $8 million in Santa Monica by adding an incremental tax of $25 per $1,000 of value above $8 million. The tax would have generated an estimated $12-25 million annually through 2033 to fund general city services, with certain exemptions for charitable organizations and ground leases.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.176733", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.703190", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure DT", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2413, "fingerprint": "2022|202200229|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200229|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e08072605b732804", "measure_id": "202200229", "measure_letter": "DTS", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure DTS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) If the \u201cComprehensive Real Property Transfer Tax Measure\u201d is enacted, should at least 30% of its additional revenue be used for housing assistance to protect seniors and low-income families from housing displacement, with the remainder of the additional revenue to be used for homelessness services; behavioral health services; public safety and emergency response teams for City streets and parks; reopening public libraries; after-school programs; and crossing guards near public schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19670, "no_votes": 14161, "total_votes": 33831, "percent_yes": 58.14194082350507, "percent_no": 41.85805917649493, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asks whether at least 30% of revenue from a comprehensi...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asks whether at least 30% of revenue from a comprehensive real property transfer tax should fund housing assistance for seniors and low-income families, with remaining funds supporting homelessness services, behavioral health, public safety, libraries, after-school programs, and school crossing guards. The measure passed as a non-binding recommendation to guide potential future spending priorities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.177040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.703350", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure DTS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11047, "fingerprint": "2022|202200170|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200170|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "24eb3f85db9d4b3c", "measure_id": "202200170", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure repealing Redondo Beach\u2019s existing prohibition of all commercial cannabis activity; allowing three cannabis retailers within city limits; allowing the Redondo Beach City Council discretion to legalize other cannabis uses; and imposing operational, design, and location requirements on such businesses, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3670, "no_votes": 11262, "total_votes": 14932, "percent_yes": 24.578087329225824, "percent_no": 75.42191267077418, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have repealed Redondo Beach's ban on commercial cannabis ac...", "summary_text": "The measure would have repealed Redondo Beach's ban on commercial cannabis activity and allowed up to three cannabis retailers in the city, while giving the city council authority to approve other cannabis business types with specific operational and location requirements.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-10-19", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.264706", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.175610", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.702527", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11040, "fingerprint": "2022|202200203|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200203|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "83476af236f03d6f", "measure_id": "202200203", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Long Beach City Charter be amended to establish a Police Oversight Commission and add a Police Oversight Director, to redesign City's police oversight and accountability through modified practices, including a Director with authority to audit Police Department complaint investigations, review major use of force incidents, and make recommendations on Police Department operations, policies, procedures, and trainings, and a Commission to provide feedback to the Director, and which would replace the Citizen Police Complaint Commission?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64494, "no_votes": 43427, "total_votes": 107921, "percent_yes": 59.76038027816644, "percent_no": 40.23961972183356, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Long Beach City Charter to create a Police Oversight...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Long Beach City Charter to create a Police Oversight Commission and Police Oversight Director to replace the existing Citizen Police Complaint Commission. The new system gives the Director authority to audit police complaint investigations, review major use of force incidents, and make recommendations on police operations and policies.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.257964", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.163146", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.696967", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2351, "fingerprint": "2022|202200155|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200155|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e7ac2f075c7235bb", "measure_id": "202200155", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Cerritos City Charter be amended to add SECTION 609, which would prohibit the employment or appointment by the Mayor, City Councilmembers, or City Manager of their relatives by blood or marriage within the third degree, as defined?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7249, "no_votes": 908, "total_votes": 8157, "percent_yes": 88.86845654039476, "percent_no": 11.13154345960524, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Cerritos City Charter to prohibit the Mayor, City Co...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Cerritos City Charter to prohibit the Mayor, City Councilmembers, or City Manager from employing or appointing their relatives by blood or marriage within the third degree. The anti-nepotism provision was added as Section 609 to the city charter.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-04-12", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.150182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.691750", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2360, "fingerprint": "2022|202200185|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200185|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cee694d78d76dc44", "measure_id": "202200185", "measure_letter": "ED", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure ED", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the Compton City Charter to change the City\u2019s general municipal election date to coincide with the statewide primary election, change the date of the City\u2019s primary nominating election to an established election date, and make other related and technical changes to the City\u2019s election procedures and terms of office, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7196, "no_votes": 4137, "total_votes": 11333, "percent_yes": 63.49598517603459, "percent_no": 36.50401482396541, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Compton City Charter to move the city's general muni...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Compton City Charter to move the city's general municipal election to coincide with the statewide primary election and shifted the city's primary nominating election to an established election date. It also made related technical changes to the city's election procedures and terms of office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.152892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.693081", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure ED", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2425, "fingerprint": "2022|202200476|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200476|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0207cb19f22acc78", "measure_id": "202200476", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure EE", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade school security, emergency communications and fire safety systems, upgrade classroom technology, science, computer and engineering labs; repair aging gas/water lines, leaky roofs; ensure school drinking water remains safe; repair, construct, acquire equipment, sites/facilities; shall Wiseburn Unified School District's locally controlled measure authorizing $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 \u00a2 per $ 100 of assessed valuation, generating $6,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring audits, independent oversight and public disclosure of all spending?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3170, "no_votes": 2398, "total_votes": 5568, "percent_yes": 56.93247126436781, "percent_no": 43.06752873563219, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Wiseburn Unified School District to issue $98 mill...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Wiseburn Unified School District to issue $98 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including security systems, classroom technology, lab upgrades, infrastructure repairs, and equipment acquisition. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $6.3 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.181130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.705554", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure EE", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2414, "fingerprint": "2022|202200230|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200230|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b511aa7416d8fd11", "measure_id": "202200230", "measure_letter": "EM", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure EM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to allow the Rent Control Board to disallow or modify annual general rent adjustments for rent controlled units during a declared state of emergency by the President of the United States, the Governor, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Officer, or the City Council or Director of Emergency Services while maintaining the landlord\u2019s ability to petition for a rent adjustment per Section 1805 of the City Charter?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20543, "no_votes": 14070, "total_votes": 34613, "percent_yes": 59.35053303672031, "percent_no": 40.64946696327969, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Housing: Rent Control", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment allows the Los Angeles Rent Control Board to suspend o...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment allows the Los Angeles Rent Control Board to suspend or modify annual rent increases for rent-controlled units during declared emergencies by federal, state, county, or city officials. Landlords retain the right to petition for individual rent adjustments under existing charter provisions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.177321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.703511", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure EM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2367, "fingerprint": "2022|202200466|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200466|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "43f7a21dd3a9a719", "measure_id": "202200466", "measure_letter": "ES", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure ES", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and improve East Lancaster's aging neighborhood elementary and middle schools, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, upgrade school safety systems, repair, construct, and acquire classrooms, labs, facilities/ equipment, support hands-on instruction in math, science/ technology, shall Eastside Union School District's measure be adopted authorizing $23,000,000 in bonds, without raising taxes above current rates, levying 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($1,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight and all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2719, "no_votes": 1508, "total_votes": 4227, "percent_yes": 64.3245800804353, "percent_no": 35.6754199195647, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Eastside Union School District to issue $23 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Eastside Union School District to issue $23 million in bonds to repair and improve elementary and middle school facilities, including roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, safety systems, and classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.155187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.694341", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure ES", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11046, "fingerprint": "2022|202200216|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200216|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3cef9297562eb799", "measure_id": "202200216", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the terms served by City Council Members in the City of Pico Rivera be limited to not more than three (3) consecutive four (4) year terms, after which City Council Members shall not be qualified to serve in that elected office for a period of four (4) years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10401, "no_votes": 1750, "total_votes": 12151, "percent_yes": 85.59789317751626, "percent_no": 14.402106822483745, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure limits Pico Rivera City Council members to no more than three con...", "summary_text": "The measure limits Pico Rivera City Council members to no more than three consecutive four-year terms, after which they must wait four years before being eligible to serve again.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.262832", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.172660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.700893", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2352, "fingerprint": "2022|202200156|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200156|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "383ba35ec73c6f2a", "measure_id": "202200156", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall SECTION 400 of the Cerritos City Charter be amended to remove current limitations regarding the terms of office for City Councilmembers?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1648, "no_votes": 6260, "total_votes": 7908, "percent_yes": 20.839656044511887, "percent_no": 79.16034395548812, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have removed existing term limits for City Council ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have removed existing term limits for City Council members in Cerritos, California, allowing them to serve unlimited terms in office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-04-12", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.150493", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.691898", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2353, "fingerprint": "2022|202200157|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200157|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "947cbe7c60ee4a05", "measure_id": "202200157", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall SECTION 400 of the Cerritos City Charter not be substantively amended, which would keep the current limitations regarding the terms of office for City Councilmembers, if another competing ballot measure, relating to TERM LIMITS, is affirmatively approved by a simple majority of the votes cast by the electorate for the competing ballot measure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4966, "no_votes": 2693, "total_votes": 7659, "percent_yes": 64.83875179527352, "percent_no": 35.161248204726476, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prevented changes to the existing term limits for Cer...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prevented changes to the existing term limits for Cerritos City Councilmembers if a competing ballot measure on term limits was also approved by voters. The measure was structured as a contingency provision to maintain the current term limit rules in the city charter.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-04-12", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.150763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.692046", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2415, "fingerprint": "2022|202200231|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200231|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b2b4b94c07c839ec", "measure_id": "202200231", "measure_letter": "GS", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure GS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure adding Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter 4.90 to establish designated funds for schools, homelessness prevention, and affordable housing, and an eleven-member resident oversight committee, and amending Chapter 6.96 to provide a third tier transfer tax rate of $56.000 per $1,000 of value for property transfers of $8,000,000 or more, providing an estimated $50,000,000 annually for homelessness prevention, affordable housing, and schools, until repealed, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19467, "no_votes": 16926, "total_votes": 36393, "percent_yes": 53.49105597230237, "percent_no": 46.50894402769763, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a transfer tax of $56 per $1,000 of value on propert...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a transfer tax of $56 per $1,000 of value on property sales of $8 million or more in Santa Monica, expected to generate approximately $50 million annually. The revenue will fund homelessness prevention, affordable housing, and schools, with oversight provided by an eleven-member resident committee.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.177611", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.703672", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure GS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11045, "fingerprint": "2022|202200213|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200213|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "aad9b996b919864e", "measure_id": "202200213", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an amendment to the Pasadena City Charter limiting rent adjustments in the City of Pasadena annually to 75% of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for multifamily rental units built before February 1, 1995; prohibiting evictions from rental units, except for just cause based on 11 specified criteria; and creating an independent Rental Housing Board appointed by the City Council to oversee and adopt rules and regulations, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25029, "no_votes": 21493, "total_votes": 46522, "percent_yes": 53.80035252138773, "percent_no": 46.19964747861227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Housing: Rent Control", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment limits annual rent increases for multifamily rental un...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment limits annual rent increases for multifamily rental units built before February 1, 1995 to 75% of the Consumer Price Index increase and restricts evictions to 11 specified just-cause criteria. It also establishes an independent Rental Housing Board appointed by the City Council to oversee these rent control regulations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.262089", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.171413", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.700285", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11038, "fingerprint": "2022|202200160|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200160|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3434956de8ca9d62", "measure_id": "202200160", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "In response to increasing public health and safety concerns, shall the City Council adopt an ordinance imposing an administrative fine for loitering or camping within 500 feet of sensitive uses such as schools, churches, daycares, parks and libraries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5720, "no_votes": 1813, "total_votes": 7533, "percent_yes": 75.93256338776052, "percent_no": 24.067436612239476, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Safety: Civil Fines/Criminal Penalties", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Los Angeles City Council to impose administrative ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Los Angeles City Council to impose administrative fines for loitering or camping within 500 feet of schools, churches, daycares, parks, and libraries. It passed with 50.8% of the vote.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-04-12", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.257222", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.160178", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.696323", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2354, "fingerprint": "2022|202200158|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200158|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "38b7832f502a4e5b", "measure_id": "202200158", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall SECTION 400 of the Cerritos City Charter be amended to modify current limitations regarding the terms of office for City Councilmembers, such that after April 12, 2022, a Councilmember who has served two (2) complete four-year terms, whether consecutive or not, is not eligible after the completion of the second four-year term to be elected or appointed to the City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5128, "no_votes": 2811, "total_votes": 7939, "percent_yes": 64.59251794936391, "percent_no": 35.40748205063609, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment establishes term limits for Cerritos City Council memb...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment establishes term limits for Cerritos City Council members, preventing anyone who has served two complete four-year terms from being elected or appointed to the council again after completing their second term.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-04-12", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.151033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.692192", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2377, "fingerprint": "2022|202200201|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200201|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f1aa565994780294", "measure_id": "202200201", "measure_letter": "HC", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure HC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance to establish a $25 per hour minimum wage, subject to annual increase, for certain employees employed to work at or by a privately owned covered healthcare facility located within the City of Inglewood, and provide for enforcement by the City, a Healthcare Worker or their representative, or another person acting on behalf of the public be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11974, "no_votes": 10397, "total_votes": 22371, "percent_yes": 53.52465245183497, "percent_no": 46.47534754816503, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance establishes a $25 per hour minimum wage with annual increases f...", "summary_text": "The ordinance establishes a $25 per hour minimum wage with annual increases for certain employees at privately owned healthcare facilities in Inglewood. It provides enforcement mechanisms through the city, healthcare workers or their representatives, and other parties acting on behalf of the public.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.159010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.696176", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure HC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2416, "fingerprint": "2022|202200232|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200232|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b16a9741f1d8b069", "measure_id": "202200232", "measure_letter": "HMP", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure HMP", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to establish a business tax on every licensed cannabis business (including adult-use nonmedicinal cannabis retailers, distribution, manufacturing, cultivation, laboratory testing, or any other licensed cannabis business) and retailers of products containing psychoactive cannabinoids including derived from industrial hemp, up to 10% of gross receipts on cannabis and/or hemp-derived psychoactive products sold in the City, which all together could generate an estimated $3-5 million annually until repealed be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23646, "no_votes": 12056, "total_votes": 35702, "percent_yes": 66.23158366478069, "percent_no": 33.768416335219314, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a business tax of up to 10% of gross receipts on lic...", "summary_text": "This measure established a business tax of up to 10% of gross receipts on licensed cannabis businesses and retailers of psychoactive hemp products in Los Angeles. The tax was estimated to generate $3-5 million annually for the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.177909", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.703823", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure HMP", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2420, "fingerprint": "2022|202200235|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200235|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bc66790d2c8c6300", "measure_id": "202200235", "measure_letter": "HR", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure HR", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the general plan land use designation change from \"Institutional\" to \"Hillside\" and the zoning designation change from \"Institutional\" to \"Hillside Management\" for the Mater Dolorosa Property?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2216, "no_votes": 3185, "total_votes": 5401, "percent_yes": 41.02943899277911, "percent_no": 58.97056100722089, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.179045", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.704447", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure HR", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2339, "fingerprint": "2022|202200173|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200173|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b668399534d898d6", "measure_id": "202200173", "measure_letter": "HT", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure HT", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted to increase the maximum rate of the City's Transient Occupancy Tax (also known as Hotel Tax) charged to guests of hotels and any other overnight lodging facilities from a maximum of 10% to 12% as of January 1, 2023, providing an additional estimated $730,000 annually until ended by voters for City services including public safety response, street repair and maintenance, park construction and maintenance and for general government use?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7675, "no_votes": 6563, "total_votes": 14238, "percent_yes": 53.90504284309594, "percent_no": 46.09495715690406, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Los Angeles's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Los Angeles's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from a maximum of 10% to 12% starting January 1, 2023, generating an estimated $730,000 annually for city services including public safety, street repair, parks, and general government operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.146238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.689803", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure HT", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11036, "fingerprint": "2022|202200195|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200195|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "10b2ceb41f015b0b", "measure_id": "202200195", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to adopt a Charter to provide the City maximum authority over municipal affairs; allow all Councilmembers to appoint members to City commissions subject to approval of the Council; preserve the authority of the City Attorney to prosecute misdemeanors; and set annual compensation for Councilmembers at the 2021 HUD low-income level for a family of two ($75,700), with any future salary adjustments subject to general law, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5003, "no_votes": 7675, "total_votes": 12678, "percent_yes": 39.46206026187096, "percent_no": 60.53793973812904, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have adopted a new city charter for Los Angeles giving the...", "summary_text": "This measure would have adopted a new city charter for Los Angeles giving the city maximum authority over municipal affairs, allowing all council members to appoint commission members subject to council approval, preserving the city attorney's authority to prosecute misdemeanors, and setting annual council member compensation at $75,700 with future adjustments subject to general law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.255913", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.157012", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.695258", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2355, "fingerprint": "2022|202200159|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200159|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a6f20aed43ef0b73", "measure_id": "202200159", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall SECTION 400 of the Cerritos City Charter be amended to modify current limitations regarding the terms of office for City Councilmembers, such that after April 12, 2022, a Councilmember who has served three (3) complete four-year terms, whether consecutive or not, is not eligible after the completion of the third four-year term to be elected or appointed to the City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3936, "no_votes": 3775, "total_votes": 7711, "percent_yes": 51.04396316949812, "percent_no": 48.95603683050188, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-04-12", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.151317", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.692342", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2366, "fingerprint": "2022|202200190|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200190|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7028171c78561b59", "measure_id": "202200190", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance establishing a minimum wage of at least $25 per hour for defined healthcare workers in the City of Duarte; requiring an annual healthcare workers minimum wage increase beginning January 2024; requiring enforcement at the City's expense; establishing judicial remedies for violations including penalties up to $120 per healthcare worker for each day a violation occurs, attorneys' fees, and treble damages be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2177, "no_votes": 3671, "total_votes": 5848, "percent_yes": 37.22640218878249, "percent_no": 62.77359781121751, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a minimum wage of at least $25 per hour fo...", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a minimum wage of at least $25 per hour for defined healthcare workers in the City of Duarte, with annual increases starting in January 2024. It would have also created enforcement mechanisms and judicial remedies including penalties up to $120 per healthcare worker per day of violation, plus attorneys' fees and treble damages.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.154916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.694193", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2365, "fingerprint": "2022|202200465|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200465|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a5767308362de18e", "measure_id": "202200465", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and improve Downey's aging neighborhood schools, improve school safety/security systems, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, ventilation; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, labs, facilities/ equipment, support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts/ skilled trades, shall Downey Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $504,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 5 cents per $100 assessed value ($20,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight and all money locally--controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14407, "no_votes": 10429, "total_votes": 24836, "percent_yes": 58.00853599613465, "percent_no": 41.99146400386535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Downey Unified School District to issue $504 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Downey Unified School District to issue $504 million in bonds to repair and improve school facilities, including fixing roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and constructing new classrooms and labs. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 5 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.154616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.694040", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2397, "fingerprint": "2022|202200214|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200214|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2d9a1324d062bc8b", "measure_id": "202200214", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To keep City libraries well-maintained; provide books/materials, youth reading/homework programs; maintain library hours/days open; retain qualified librarians; ensure computer access; shall the City of Pasadena continue the voter approved annual parcel tax, currently $41 for single-family residences and condominium units and specified rates for other parcel types, generating $2,800,000 annually for 15 years, limiting annual increases to the Consumer Price Index; requiring audits, locally controlled funds, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40000, "no_votes": 7280, "total_votes": 47280, "percent_yes": 84.60236886632826, "percent_no": 15.397631133671737, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would continue an existing annual parcel tax in Pasadena for 15 ...", "summary_text": "This measure would continue an existing annual parcel tax in Pasadena for 15 years, charging $41 for single-family homes and condominiums with specified rates for other property types, generating approximately $2.8 million annually to fund library operations including maintenance, materials, programs, staffing, and computer access. The tax increases would be limited to the Consumer Price Index and funds would be subject to audits and local control.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.171683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.700434", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2388, "fingerprint": "2022|202200470|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200470|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b306a8da7c3113fe", "measure_id": "202200470", "measure_letter": "LA", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade local community colleges, classrooms, water pipes, sewer/gas lines, technology, science labs for nurses, paramedics, firefighters, veterans; prepare students for jobs/university transfer; remove asbestos, lead paint; acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, equipment; shall Los Angeles Community College District's measure authorizing $5,300,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating $345,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring oversight, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 700587, "no_votes": 423856, "total_votes": 1124443, "percent_yes": 62.30524802057552, "percent_no": 37.69475197942448, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Los Angeles Community College District to issue $5", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Los Angeles Community College District to issue $5.3 billion in bonds to repair, upgrade, and construct college facilities, classrooms, labs, and infrastructure including removal of hazardous materials. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $345 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.167824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.698448", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2380, "fingerprint": "2022|202200204|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200204|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bf61b0dce12a205c", "measure_id": "202200204", "measure_letter": "LBC", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LBC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter of Long Beach be amended to realign the City's primary and general election dates with the State's primary and general election dates held in even-numbered years, and make other related and technical changes to City election procedures?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80644, "no_votes": 26307, "total_votes": 106951, "percent_yes": 75.40275453244944, "percent_no": 24.597245467550565, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Long Beach's City Charter to move the city's primary and...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Long Beach's City Charter to move the city's primary and general elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years to align with state election dates. It also made related technical changes to the city's election procedures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.163923", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.697114", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LBC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2381, "fingerprint": "2022|202200468|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200468|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "82b7a916620e5609", "measure_id": "202200468", "measure_letter": "LBU", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LBU", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter of Long Beach be amended to realign the Long Beach Unified School District's primary and general election dates with the State's primary and general election dates held in even-numbered years, and make other related and technical changes to Long Beach Unified School District election procedures?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89106, "no_votes": 32289, "total_votes": 121395, "percent_yes": 73.40170517731373, "percent_no": 26.59829482268627, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Long Beach's City Charter to move the Long Beach Unified...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Long Beach's City Charter to move the Long Beach Unified School District's primary and general elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years to align with state election dates. It also made related technical changes to the school district's election procedures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.164474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.697262", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LBU", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2385, "fingerprint": "2022|202200205|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200205|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "62522a4d2357c961", "measure_id": "202200205", "measure_letter": "LH", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LH", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure authorizing public entities in the City of Los Angeles to develop, construct, or acquire up to 5,000 additional units of low-income rental housing in each Council District to address homelessness and affordable housing needs, subject to availability of funding and City development requirements, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 618256, "no_votes": 259308, "total_votes": 877564, "percent_yes": 70.45138588182742, "percent_no": 29.54861411817258, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes public entities in Los Angeles to develop, construct,...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes public entities in Los Angeles to develop, construct, or acquire up to 5,000 additional units of low-income rental housing in each City Council District. The housing development is subject to available funding and must meet City development requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.166794", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.698003", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LH", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11049, "fingerprint": "2022|202200239|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200239|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "68a4cb55ee359f5d", "measure_id": "202200239", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain funding for the operation and maintenance of the South Pasadena Public Library, including technology upgrades, resources for students, and programs such as family story time and summer reading, shall an ordinance be adopted extending South Pasadena\u2019s Library Special Tax, which is due to expire on June 30, 2024, to remain in effect until otherwise terminated by a majority vote of the South Pasadena electorate?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9357, "no_votes": 1442, "total_votes": 10799, "percent_yes": 86.64691175108807, "percent_no": 13.35308824891193, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended South Pasadena's Library Special Tax beyond its June 30...", "summary_text": "This measure extended South Pasadena's Library Special Tax beyond its June 30, 2024 expiration date to continue funding library operations, maintenance, technology upgrades, student resources, and programs. The tax will remain in effect until terminated by a majority vote of South Pasadena voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.267910", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.180526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.705227", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2378, "fingerprint": "2022|202200462|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200462|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5fba45fb65cfe25a", "measure_id": "202200462", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure LL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair aging classrooms/leaking roofs to ensure student health/safety/achievement, upgrade plumbing, electrical, gas lines, heating/ventilation, security systems, classroom technology, remove asbestos, lead paint, mold, provide safe drinking water, repair, construct/acquire classrooms, sites/equipment, shall Little Lake City School District\u2019s measure authorizing $36,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2/$100 assessed value ($2,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with audits/oversight, all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2638, "no_votes": 1608, "total_votes": 4246, "percent_yes": 62.129062647197365, "percent_no": 37.870937352802635, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Little Lake City School District to issue $36 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Little Lake City School District to issue $36 million in bonds to fund school facility repairs and improvements including fixing roofs, upgrading utilities and technology, removing hazardous materials, and constructing new classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $2 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.161601", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.696648", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure LL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2374, "fingerprint": "2022|202200197|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200197|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cc19123e06a9b469", "measure_id": "202200197", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance proposed by initiative petition be adopted that repeals the City\u2019s existing ban on cannabis businesses and allows by City-approved permit up to two cannabis retail storefront businesses, including home delivery from those stores?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2418, "no_votes": 6139, "total_votes": 8557, "percent_yes": 28.25756690428889, "percent_no": 71.7424330957111, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have repealed the city's ban on cannabis businesses and all...", "summary_text": "The measure would have repealed the city's ban on cannabis businesses and allowed up to two cannabis retail stores with home delivery services through a city-approved permit system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.157592", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.695577", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2391, "fingerprint": "2022|202200210|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200210|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3d5b6fcb4891d83a", "measure_id": "202200210", "measure_letter": "MB", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure MB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure repealing Manhattan Beach\u2019s existing prohibition of all commercial cannabis activity; allowing three cannabis retailers within city limits; allowing Manhattan Beach City Council discretion to legalize other cannabis uses; and imposing operational, design, and location requirements on such businesses, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3994, "no_votes": 13393, "total_votes": 17387, "percent_yes": 22.971185368378674, "percent_no": 77.02881463162133, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have repealed Manhattan Beach's ban on commercial cannabis ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have repealed Manhattan Beach's ban on commercial cannabis activity and allowed up to three cannabis retailers in the city, while giving the City Council discretion to approve other cannabis businesses subject to operational and location requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.169348", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.699202", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure MB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2390, "fingerprint": "2022|202200209|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200209|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b962f54c640ef90b", "measure_id": "202200209", "measure_letter": "MC", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure MC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support such city services as public safety, crime and fire prevention, addressing homelessness, keeping public areas safe and clean, preventing speeding and reckless driving, protecting coastal waters and beaches from pollution, preserving natural areas, supporting local businesses, and other general city services; shall a measure be adopted establishing a 1/2\u00a2 transactions and use (sales) tax providing approximately $3,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosures and local control of funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2444, "no_votes": 2209, "total_votes": 4653, "percent_yes": 52.52525252525253, "percent_no": 47.47474747474747, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.5% sales tax in Los Angeles to generate approximately $3 million annually for various city services including public safety, homelessness programs, environmental protection, and other general municipal services. The tax remains in effect until voters choose to end it and requires public disclosure of spending and local control of funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.168713", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.698890", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure MC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2393, "fingerprint": "2022|202200471|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200471|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d685d8b4746170f4", "measure_id": "202200471", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure MM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities, and instructional technology to support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts and skilled trades; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems; and improve school safety/security systems, shall Monrovia Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $75,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($4,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight and all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8364, "no_votes": 5005, "total_votes": 13369, "percent_yes": 62.562644924826095, "percent_no": 37.437355075173905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Monrovia Unified School District to issue $75 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Monrovia Unified School District to issue $75 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities including classrooms, labs, technology, and infrastructure systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.170245", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.699669", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure MM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2394, "fingerprint": "2022|202200212|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200212|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6b00f5c45195c0d4", "measure_id": "202200212", "measure_letter": "MP", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure MP", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance maintaining Monterey Park\u2019s long term financial stability and locally controlled services such as 9-1-1 emergency/safety response; conducting neighborhood/park police patrols; helping prevent thefts/property crimes; protecting local drinking water; preparing for drought; retaining/attracting local businesses/jobs; repairing streets/potholes; addressing homelessness; and allowing other government use by establishing a \u00be\u00a2 transactions and use (sales) tax until ended by voters, generating approximately $6,000,000 annually, with audits/public spending disclosure, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6690, "no_votes": 4818, "total_votes": 11508, "percent_yes": 58.13347236704901, "percent_no": 41.86652763295099, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in Monterey Park to fund general city services including emergency response, police patrols, infrastructure repairs, and other municipal operations, generating approximately $6 million annually. The tax continues until voters choose to end it and includes requirements for audits and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.170551", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.699819", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure MP", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2368, "fingerprint": "2022|202200191|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200191|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c3fb5546f7774901", "measure_id": "202200191", "measure_letter": "OT", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure OT", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To enhance funding for police protection and public safety services, community code enforcement and beautification efforts and other general governmental purposes, shall the City of El Monte increase its existing transient occupancy tax paid only by hotel and motel guests from its current rate 10% to a new increased rate of 14% providing an estimated $350,000 annually in additional general fund revenues, until ended by El Monte voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5625, "no_votes": 5692, "total_votes": 11317, "percent_yes": 49.70398515507644, "percent_no": 50.29601484492356, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased El Monte's transient occupancy tax on hotel ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased El Monte's transient occupancy tax on hotel and motel guests from 10% to 14%, generating an estimated $350,000 annually in additional general fund revenue for police protection, public safety services, code enforcement, beautification efforts, and other general governmental purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.155472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.694493", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure OT", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2396, "fingerprint": "2022|202200473|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200473|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c05d7f11707fcb2d", "measure_id": "202200473", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the members of the Paramount Unified School District Board of Education be limited to three (3) four-year terms of office for a maximum of 12 years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7011, "no_votes": 2326, "total_votes": 9337, "percent_yes": 75.08835814501445, "percent_no": 24.911641854985547, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure limits Paramount Unified School District Board of Education membe...", "summary_text": "The measure limits Paramount Unified School District Board of Education members to a maximum of three four-year terms, totaling 12 years of service.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.171118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.700139", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2417, "fingerprint": "2022|202200233|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200233|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "85e6dab594a8143b", "measure_id": "202200233", "measure_letter": "PB", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: (a) expand eligibility requirements for service on the City\u2019s Personnel Board to include, in addition to City of Santa Monica (\u201cCity\u201d) residents, residents of Los Angeles County that are employed full-time within the City, or own real property in the City, or have been issued a business license by the City; and (b) reduce the term of service for Personnel Board members from five to four years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20350, "no_votes": 13560, "total_votes": 33910, "percent_yes": 60.01179593040401, "percent_no": 39.98820406959599, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment expanded eligibility for Santa Monica's Personnel Boar...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment expanded eligibility for Santa Monica's Personnel Board to include Los Angeles County residents who work full-time in the city, own property there, or have a city business license, in addition to city residents. It also reduced Personnel Board members' terms from five years to four years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.178192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.703974", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2400, "fingerprint": "2022|202200217|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200217|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bc5b8aa57440d284", "measure_id": "202200217", "measure_letter": "PC", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to change the City\u2019s campaign finance and conflict of interest laws; including updates to the City\u2019s campaign contribution limits, voluntary expenditure ceiling, rules for use of surplus campaign funds, and mandating disclosure of certain campaign contributions by a Councilmember prior to casting a vote on a City matter where the contributor is the applicant?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14966, "no_votes": 5113, "total_votes": 20079, "percent_yes": 74.53558444145625, "percent_no": 25.46441555854375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Los Angeles's City Charter to update campaign finance an...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Los Angeles's City Charter to update campaign finance and conflict of interest laws, including changes to contribution limits, expenditure ceilings, rules for surplus campaign funds, and requirements for councilmembers to disclose certain campaign contributions before voting on matters involving those contributors.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.172940", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.701041", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2398, "fingerprint": "2022|202200474|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200474|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0132f6d72d1c2a15", "measure_id": "202200474", "measure_letter": "PCC", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PCC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade aging labs, instructional technology, classrooms and career-training facilities, improve student access to affordable, high quality education in subjects like nursing, health sciences, engineering, technology and skilled trades; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems; and remove asbestos/ lead pipes, shall the Pasadena Area Community College District bond measure authorizing $565,000,000 at legal rates be adopted, levying 2\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value ($32,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 87715, "no_votes": 36539, "total_votes": 124254, "percent_yes": 70.59330081928951, "percent_no": 29.40669918071049, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Pasadena Area Community College District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Pasadena Area Community College District to issue $565 million in bonds to upgrade labs, classrooms, career-training facilities, and infrastructure including roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, while removing hazardous materials like asbestos and lead pipes. The bonds would be funded through a property tax of 2 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $32 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.171957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.700586", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PCC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2423, "fingerprint": "2022|202200238|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200238|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5e034dcce429d4df", "measure_id": "202200238", "measure_letter": "PD", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PD", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To assist in maintaining public safety, repair streets, maintain parks, services for seniors, and other general city services, shall the annual taxes and solid waste processing fees paid by Material Recovery Facilities be increased to $500 plus $1.94 per ton and annual CPI adjustment, and provide for increases every three years to all other Business License Taxes based on cost of living increases, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5046, "no_votes": 5810, "total_votes": 10856, "percent_yes": 46.481208548268235, "percent_no": 53.518791451731765, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased annual taxes and solid waste processing fees...", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased annual taxes and solid waste processing fees for Material Recovery Facilities to $500 plus $1.94 per ton with annual CPI adjustments, and implemented automatic cost-of-living increases every three years for all other business license taxes in Los Angeles. The revenue would have funded public safety, street repairs, park maintenance, senior services, and other general city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.180245", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.705067", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PD", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2401, "fingerprint": "2022|202200218|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200218|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "acffceffca8c68bd", "measure_id": "202200218", "measure_letter": "PE", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PE", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to create an ethics commission of Pomona residents who shall be responsible for monitoring, advising, educating and responding to issues regarding applicable State and local governmental ethics laws, including campaign finance limits and disclosure, nepotism, lobbying, conflict of interest and open meeting laws, and for the administration and implementation of programs to accomplish the goals and purposes of the commission?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14903, "no_votes": 5877, "total_votes": 20780, "percent_yes": 71.71799807507219, "percent_no": 28.282001924927812, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to establish an ethics comm...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to establish an ethics commission comprised of Pomona residents responsible for monitoring and enforcing state and local ethics laws, including campaign finance, nepotism, lobbying, conflicts of interest, and open meeting requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.173208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.701199", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PE", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2402, "fingerprint": "2022|202200219|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200219|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9d01201282f8939e", "measure_id": "202200219", "measure_letter": "PG", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PG", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to make various updates and clarifications to City policy, including addition of a preamble outlining the City\u2019s values, updating rules for filing Mayoral and Council vacancies, increasing notice of public meetings, updating rules for appointed commissions and boards, and making various other technical changes as specified therein?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14561, "no_votes": 5363, "total_votes": 19924, "percent_yes": 73.0827143143947, "percent_no": 26.917285685605293, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment would add a preamble outlining the city's values, upda...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment would add a preamble outlining the city's values, update rules for filling mayoral and council vacancies, increase public meeting notice requirements, revise rules for appointed commissions and boards, and make various other technical changes to the City Charter. The measure passed with 50.7% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.173501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.701348", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PG", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2403, "fingerprint": "2022|202200220|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200220|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "040055c83ac26d87", "measure_id": "202200220", "measure_letter": "PI", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PI", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to create an independent citizens\u2019 redistricting commission of Pomona residents who shall determine the boundaries of City Council electoral districts every ten years or as needed after the United States Census in accordance with applicable Federal and State law?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13199, "no_votes": 7140, "total_votes": 20339, "percent_yes": 64.89502925414229, "percent_no": 35.10497074585771, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Pomona's City Charter to establish an independent citizen...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Pomona's City Charter to establish an independent citizens' redistricting commission composed of city residents to redraw City Council district boundaries every ten years following the U.S. Census. The commission would operate independently and follow federal and state redistricting laws when determining electoral district boundaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.173861", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.701508", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PI", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2404, "fingerprint": "2022|202200221|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200221|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b7971d90a0cadb62", "measure_id": "202200221", "measure_letter": "PL", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to establish a local primary election for the office of Mayor and City Councilmember to coincide with the Statewide Primary Election, beginning in the year 2024; whereby if a candidate secures majority voter approval in the local primary, he or she will be elected, and if no candidate secures majority voter approval, the top two candidates shall stand for a run-off election to coincide with the Statewide General Election?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15043, "no_votes": 5146, "total_votes": 20189, "percent_yes": 74.51087225716975, "percent_no": 25.48912774283025, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to establish a primary elec...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to establish a primary election system for Mayor and City Council races starting in 2024, where candidates who receive a majority of votes in the primary would win outright, while races without a majority winner would proceed to a runoff between the top two candidates. The primary elections would be scheduled to coincide with statewide primary elections, and any necessary runoffs would coincide with statewide general elections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.174133", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.701665", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2405, "fingerprint": "2022|202200222|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200222|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "02c7963712522e74", "measure_id": "202200222", "measure_letter": "PO", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PO", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to create a police oversight commission of Pomona residents who shall be authorized to receive community complaints and concerns about police matters; to review, investigate and report on incidents in connection with the Pomona Police Department; and to advise City officials and conduct public outreach on policing/community relations issues?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14849, "no_votes": 6310, "total_votes": 21159, "percent_yes": 70.17817477196465, "percent_no": 29.82182522803535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the City Charter to create a police oversight commission ...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the City Charter to create a police oversight commission of Pomona residents with authority to receive complaints, investigate police incidents, and advise city officials on police-community relations matters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.174414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.701812", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PO", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2376, "fingerprint": "2022|202200200|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200200|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1434179b21cedf83", "measure_id": "202200200", "measure_letter": "PP", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PP", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Should there be a City-wide overnight parking permit program of which times and dates will be set by resolution by the City? Fiscal impact will be minimal because permit fees will offset the City costs of processing the permits.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2575, "no_votes": 2665, "total_votes": 5240, "percent_yes": 49.1412213740458, "percent_no": 50.8587786259542, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.158485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.696029", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PP", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2406, "fingerprint": "2022|202200223|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200223|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dc398de90b9e6ab6", "measure_id": "202200223", "measure_letter": "PR", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PR", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to establish a \u201cresign to run\u201d rule whereby any current City Councilmember running for Mayor must resign his or her Council seat if the new Mayoral term will begin before the City Councilmember\u2019s current term ends?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13945, "no_votes": 6369, "total_votes": 20314, "percent_yes": 68.64723835778281, "percent_no": 31.35276164221719, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires Los Angeles City Council members to resign th...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires Los Angeles City Council members to resign their council seat if they run for mayor and the mayoral term would begin before their council term expires. The measure establishes a \"resign to run\" rule specifically for councilmembers seeking the mayor's office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.174712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.702032", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PR", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2395, "fingerprint": "2022|202200472|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200472|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "37576d755349cb1e", "measure_id": "202200472", "measure_letter": "PRM", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PRM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue improving local District schools; replacing leaky roofs/windows; making school safety, security, energy, water efficiency improvements; modernizing science, technology, engineering, arts, and math labs,\u00b7 and acquiring learning technology/equipment,\u00b7 shall Palmdale (Elementary) School District's measure authorizing $120,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value on average (raising $6,338,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, no money for administrators and all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11370, "no_votes": 8148, "total_votes": 19518, "percent_yes": 58.25391945896096, "percent_no": 41.74608054103904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Palmdale Elementary School District to issue $120...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Palmdale Elementary School District to issue $120 million in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including roof and window repairs, safety and security upgrades, energy and water efficiency improvements, and modernization of STEM labs and learning technology. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.170832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.699980", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PRM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2407, "fingerprint": "2022|202200224|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200224|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "70258c4a63247cbb", "measure_id": "202200224", "measure_letter": "PS", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Pomona adopt the measure enacting a $0.15 per gross square foot special tax on industrial parcels located within the City, subject to annual CPI adjustment, generating approximately $14,000,000 annually in dedicated revenue that may be used solely for the capital improvement, operation, maintenance, repair and/or restoration of Pomona public streets, roadways, sidewalks, roadway lighting, traffic signals or other right of way improvements that implement a Complete Streets Plan, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11514, "no_votes": 9038, "total_votes": 20552, "percent_yes": 56.02374464772285, "percent_no": 43.97625535227715, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a $0", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a $0.15 per square foot annual tax on industrial properties in Pomona to generate approximately $14 million yearly for street repairs, sidewalks, traffic signals, and other road infrastructure improvements under a Complete Streets Plan. The tax would have been adjusted annually for inflation and could only be ended by future voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.174983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.702199", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2408, "fingerprint": "2022|202200225|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200225|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9fedb6da266b0e5b", "measure_id": "202200225", "measure_letter": "PT", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PT", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to enact a three consecutive term limit on elected service in Pomona, whether serving as Mayor or as a Council Member, followed by a four-year \u201ccooling off\u201d period after serving three consecutive terms during which a person may not serve on the City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15530, "no_votes": 5044, "total_votes": 20574, "percent_yes": 75.48362010304267, "percent_no": 24.516379896957332, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment establishes a three consecutive term limit for Pomona'...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment establishes a three consecutive term limit for Pomona's Mayor and Council Members, followed by a mandatory four-year period where former officeholders cannot serve on the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.175306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.702349", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PT", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2382, "fingerprint": "2022|202200469|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200469|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5b5840ece341d9b9", "measure_id": "202200469", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade neighborhood public schools, vocational, technology, math, science classrooms/labs; provide safe drinking water; upgrade security, door locks, cameras, earthquake/fire safety; remove lead paint/asbestos; repair, construct, acquire facilities/equipment, shall Long Beach Unified School District's measure authorizing $1,700,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates levying $0.06 per $100 of assessed valuation ($105,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring oversight, public spending disclosure, all funds used locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76612, "no_votes": 49551, "total_votes": 126163, "percent_yes": 60.72461815270721, "percent_no": 39.27538184729279, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Long Beach Unified School District to issue $1", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Long Beach Unified School District to issue $1.7 billion in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, labs, safety systems, and removal of hazardous materials. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $0.06 per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.164799", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.697410", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11042, "fingerprint": "2022|202200165|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200165|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8395edd9715dbe64", "measure_id": "202200165", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance limiting the number of four-year terms that may be served by members of the Lynwood City Council be limited to three consecutive terms prospectively be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2483, "no_votes": 1589, "total_votes": 4072, "percent_yes": 60.97740667976424, "percent_no": 39.02259332023576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance limits Lynwood City Council members to three consecutive four-y...", "summary_text": "The ordinance limits Lynwood City Council members to three consecutive four-year terms, applying prospectively to future service.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.260013", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.168103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.698598", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2349, "fingerprint": "2022|202200181|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200181|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "064bc8180a621888", "measure_id": "202200181", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain services such as 911 emergency response/public safety; natural disaster/public health emergency preparedness; protect local drinking water; repair streets/potholes and other general City services, shall the measure, continuing the existing 2% Utility Users Tax (no tax increase) limited to electric/gas utilities, exempting senior and low-income households, providing approximately $8,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, all funds for Carson, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16977, "no_votes": 4665, "total_votes": 21642, "percent_yes": 78.44469087884669, "percent_no": 21.555309121153314, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues Carson's existing 2% utility users tax on electric and...", "summary_text": "This measure continues Carson's existing 2% utility users tax on electric and gas utilities, exempting senior and low-income households, to generate approximately $8 million annually for city services including emergency response, street repairs, and water protection. The tax rate remains unchanged from current levels and requires voter approval to end.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.149559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.691447", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2418, "fingerprint": "2022|202200234|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200234|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b01d2abcc9c94ffa", "measure_id": "202200234", "measure_letter": "RC", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure RC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require intended owner occupancy of rent-controlled units for two years before tenant eviction; require owner occupancy within 60 days of vacancy; reduce the maximum Annual General Adjustment from 6% to 0.8% from 2/1/23 through 8/31/23, or average not to exceed 3%, with a 3% maximum Annual General Adjustment thereafter; and require elections only if the number of qualified candidates exceeds the number of open Board positions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20149, "no_votes": 14166, "total_votes": 34315, "percent_yes": 58.71776191170043, "percent_no": 41.28223808829957, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Housing: Rent Control", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment strengthens Los Angeles rent control by requiring prop...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment strengthens Los Angeles rent control by requiring property owners to occupy rent-controlled units for two years before evicting tenants for owner occupancy, reducing maximum annual rent increases from 6% to 3% (with a temporary period of 0.8%), and changing the process for rent stabilization board elections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.178481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.704141", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure RC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11044, "fingerprint": "2022|202200167|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200167|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2b6004c41b0f5fb2", "measure_id": "202200167", "measure_letter": "RM", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure RM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Monrovia Municipal Code to eliminate the directly elected Mayor position, and to establish an annual rotation process among City Councilmembers for the offices of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1861, "no_votes": 5903, "total_votes": 7764, "percent_yes": 23.969603297269447, "percent_no": 76.03039670273056, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would have eliminated the directly elected mayor position in M...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would have eliminated the directly elected mayor position in Monrovia and instead established an annual rotation system where city council members would take turns serving as mayor and mayor pro tempore.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.261149", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.169931", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.699520", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure RM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2346, "fingerprint": "2022|202200178|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200178|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a41279be694dd845", "measure_id": "202200178", "measure_letter": "RM", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure RM", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the voters elect five Councilmembers to a four-year term with an annually sequential rotating Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park commencing in the year 2024?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5312, "no_votes": 4578, "total_votes": 9890, "percent_yes": 53.7108190091001, "percent_no": 46.2891809908999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changes Baldwin Park's governance structure so that voters elect...", "summary_text": "This measure changes Baldwin Park's governance structure so that voters elect five city councilmembers to four-year terms, with the mayor and mayor pro tempore positions rotating annually among the council members starting in 2024.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.148331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.690852", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure RM", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11039, "fingerprint": "2022|202200467|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200467|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "94658a1a7cca2c11", "measure_id": "202200467", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities and instructional technology to support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts and skilled trades; improve safety/ security systems; remove asbestos, repair, construct/acquire classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $340,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, without increasing current tax rates, levying $36 per $100,000 assessed value ($23,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16797, "no_votes": 9333, "total_votes": 26130, "percent_yes": 64.28243398392652, "percent_no": 35.71756601607348, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Las Virgenes Unified School District to issue $340 mi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Las Virgenes Unified School District to issue $340 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities, and instructional technology, as well as improve safety systems and remove asbestos. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $36 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.257406", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.160889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.696498", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2341, "fingerprint": "2022|202200161|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200161|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6bbce8760ae2ee67", "measure_id": "202200161", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted by the City of Avalon enacting a one-quarter percent (1/4%) transactions and use (sales) tax, generating approximately $250,000.00 annually for general government use, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 229, "no_votes": 444, "total_votes": 673, "percent_yes": 34.02674591381872, "percent_no": 65.97325408618127, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.146824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.690102", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2358, "fingerprint": "2022|202200183|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200183|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a302719e50a8f967", "measure_id": "202200183", "measure_letter": "SL", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Commerce modify existing term limits on the office of City Councilperson so that term limits allow for the extension of Council terms due to the change of election dates mandated by state law?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1046, "no_votes": 1014, "total_votes": 2060, "percent_yes": 50.77669902912621, "percent_no": 49.22330097087379, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure modified existing term limits for City of Commerce council membe...", "summary_text": "This measure modified existing term limits for City of Commerce council members to allow for extended terms when state-mandated changes to election dates occur.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.152264", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.692786", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2419, "fingerprint": "2022|202200475|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200475|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "112c84d8cc80829d", "measure_id": "202200475", "measure_letter": "SMC", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SMC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve access to affordable education for local students, veterans, first-generation college students; provide affordable housing for homeless students; modernize instructional labs for nursing, healthcare, sustainability, media, science career training; repair/upgrade obsolete vocational classrooms/aging facilities, shall Santa Monica Community College District authorize $375,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2.5 cents per $100 assessed valuation, raising $23,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens oversight, public spending disclosure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23790, "no_votes": 17422, "total_votes": 41212, "percent_yes": 57.725905076191395, "percent_no": 42.274094923808605, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Santa Monica Community College District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Santa Monica Community College District to issue $375 million in bonds to modernize facilities, upgrade instructional labs, provide student housing, and repair aging infrastructure. The bonds would be funded through a property tax levy of 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $23 million annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.178776", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.704291", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SMC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2386, "fingerprint": "2022|202200206|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200206|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e71d2ff2dd585077", "measure_id": "202200206", "measure_letter": "SP", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SP", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance providing funding for parks, recreational centers, pools, playgrounds, waterways, beaches, green spaces, open spaces, childcare and other facilities, and increasing park equity in the City of Los Angeles, through a tax of $0.08414 per square foot on improved parcels, reduced to $0.0222 upon completion of certain programs or in 30 years, with citizen oversight and exemptions for low-income households, generating approximately $227 million annually, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 311663, "no_votes": 566430, "total_votes": 878093, "percent_yes": 35.49316530253629, "percent_no": 64.50683469746372, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Parks & Recreation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a tax of $0", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a tax of $0.08414 per square foot on improved parcels in Los Angeles to fund parks, recreational facilities, and green spaces, generating approximately $227 million annually. The tax rate would decrease to $0.0222 per square foot after 30 years or upon completion of certain programs, with exemptions for low-income households.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.167155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.698152", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SP", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2424, "fingerprint": "2022|202200169|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200169|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "62b0dc4490f73831", "measure_id": "202200169", "measure_letter": "SST", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SST", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain city services such as fire/ paramedic/ public safety/ 9-1-1 response, safe schools; protect local drinking water sources/ coastal waters from pollution; keep parks/ public areas safe/ clean; repair streets/ potholes; prevent thefts/ property crime; maintain senior services; and address homelessness, shall the City of Torrance ordinance be adopted establishing a \u00bd\u00a2 sales tax for general government use, generating approximately $18,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, independent audits, all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17996, "no_votes": 14755, "total_votes": 32751, "percent_yes": 54.94794052090013, "percent_no": 45.05205947909987, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established a 0", "summary_text": "The measure established a 0.5% sales tax in Torrance to fund general city services including public safety, infrastructure, parks, and homelessness programs, generating approximately $18 million annually. The tax includes requirements for public spending disclosure and independent audits, and can only be ended by voter approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.180823", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.705391", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SST", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2340, "fingerprint": "2022|202200174|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200174|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e14f224f33685771", "measure_id": "202200174", "measure_letter": "SW", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SW", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to establish a Sports Wagering Tax at a rate of up to 5% of sports wagering gross revenues, providing approximately $1,000,000 annually until ended by voters for general government use such as City parks, streets and public safety, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9085, "no_votes": 5097, "total_votes": 14182, "percent_yes": 64.06007615286984, "percent_no": 35.93992384713016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a tax of up to 5% on sports wagering gross revenues ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a tax of up to 5% on sports wagering gross revenues in Los Angeles, with proceeds estimated at approximately $1 million annually to fund general city services including parks, streets, and public safety.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.146526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.689952", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SW", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11037, "fingerprint": "2022|202200198|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200198|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "169d508efded0cdc", "measure_id": "202200198", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted enacting a local business tax on cannabis/hemp businesses up to $20.00 per square foot for cultivation and up to 10% of gross receipts for all other cannabis/hemp businesses, estimated to generate $700,000 - $1,500,000 annually (assuming two retail stores operating and taxed at maximum rate), until ended by voters, for general governmental use, subject to independent audits, to be effective only if cannabis business operations are allowed in the City?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5645, "no_votes": 2708, "total_votes": 8353, "percent_yes": 67.58050999640848, "percent_no": 32.41949000359152, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a local business tax on cannabis and hemp businesses in ...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a local business tax on cannabis and hemp businesses in Los Angeles, with rates up to $20 per square foot for cultivation and up to 10% of gross receipts for other operations, estimated to generate $700,000 to $1.5 million annually. The tax is designated for general governmental use and only takes effect if cannabis business operations are permitted in the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.256481", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.157911", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.695732", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2372, "fingerprint": "2022|202200461|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200461|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7ffb7a66d3f830e7", "measure_id": "202200461", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Members of the Glendale Unified School District Board of Trustees be limited to three (3) elected terms of office?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32698, "no_votes": 4023, "total_votes": 36721, "percent_yes": 89.04441600174287, "percent_no": 10.955583998257126, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would limit members of the Glendale Unified School District Boar...", "summary_text": "This measure would limit members of the Glendale Unified School District Board of Trustees to serving a maximum of three elected terms in office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.156741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.695110", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11034, "fingerprint": "2022|202200163|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200163|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6a63b13922de8c4d", "measure_id": "202200163", "measure_letter": "TL", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure TL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of Beverly Hills to establish a total three term limit during one\u2019s lifetime for the offices of City Councilmember and City Treasurer in the City of Beverly Hills?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6405, "no_votes": 1453, "total_votes": 7858, "percent_yes": 81.50928989564775, "percent_no": 18.490710104352246, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance establishes a lifetime limit of three terms for Beverly Hills ...", "summary_text": "This ordinance establishes a lifetime limit of three terms for Beverly Hills City Councilmember and City Treasurer positions.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.250732", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.149217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.691292", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure TL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2347, "fingerprint": "2022|202200179|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200179|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1a9363f78144f64f", "measure_id": "202200179", "measure_letter": "TL", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure TL", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, establishing term limits so that no member of the City Council may serve more than three terms in office in their lifetime (12 years) and no directly-elected Mayor may serve more than six terms in office in their lifetime (12 years) and no member of the City Council or directly-elected Mayor may serve more than a combined 12 years in office, regardless of the office be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8186, "no_votes": 1933, "total_votes": 10119, "percent_yes": 80.89732186974997, "percent_no": 19.102678130250027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This Los Angeles ordinance establishes lifetime term limits of three terms (1...", "summary_text": "This Los Angeles ordinance establishes lifetime term limits of three terms (12 years) for City Council members and six terms (12 years) for directly-elected mayors, with a combined maximum of 12 years total service regardless of which office is held. The measure passed in 2022.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.148601", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.690998", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure TL", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2389, "fingerprint": "2022|202200208|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200208|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "867a430a40ec6720", "measure_id": "202200208", "measure_letter": "TR", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure TR", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City adopt Ordinance No.1752 establishing a 5%, but not to exceed 10% tax on businesses selling cannabis products at retail stores in the City to help fund City general fund services such as senior citizen programs, City beautification efforts, enforcement of illegal cannabis operations, public safety, housing programs, recreation services, infrastructure, and homeless reduction and other City efforts?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4765, "no_votes": 2355, "total_votes": 7120, "percent_yes": 66.92415730337079, "percent_no": 33.07584269662921, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established a 5-10% tax on retail cannabis businesses in the city...", "summary_text": "The measure established a 5-10% tax on retail cannabis businesses in the city to fund general city services including senior programs, public safety, infrastructure, and homeless reduction efforts. The tax revenue goes into the city's general fund to support various municipal services and programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.168386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.698742", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure TR", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2342, "fingerprint": "2022|202200162|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200162|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d5c684a4a050bec8", "measure_id": "202200162", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure TT", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted by the City of Avalon enacting a one percentage point (1%) increase to Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), increasing the total tax from 12 to 13 percent, and reserving the increase percentage for the general fund, generating approximately $500,000.00 annually for general government use for a period of 10 years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 312, "no_votes": 359, "total_votes": 671, "percent_yes": 46.497764530551414, "percent_no": 53.502235469448586, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased the Transient Occupancy Tax in the City of ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased the Transient Occupancy Tax in the City of Avalon from 12% to 13%, with the additional revenue going to the general fund for government operations for 10 years. The increase was projected to generate approximately $500,000 annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.147180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.690250", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure TT", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2375, "fingerprint": "2022|202200199|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200199|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dcaf988aaddd5da8", "measure_id": "202200199", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. N.S. 211, establishing a civil service system, adopted on June 7, 1960, be repealed to enable the Hermosa Beach City Council to adopt an updated personnel/civil service ordinance?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5084, "no_votes": 2569, "total_votes": 7653, "percent_yes": 66.4314647850516, "percent_no": 33.5685352149484, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure repealed Hermosa Beach's 1960 civil service ordinance to allow t...", "summary_text": "This measure repealed Hermosa Beach's 1960 civil service ordinance to allow the City Council to adopt new personnel and civil service rules.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.158213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.695880", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2387, "fingerprint": "2022|202200207|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200207|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "92643614823bb046", "measure_id": "202200207", "measure_letter": "ULA", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure ULA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance funding and authorizing affordable housing programs and resources for tenants at risk of homelessness through a 4% tax on sales/transfers of real property exceeding $5 million, and 5.5% on properties of $10 million or more, with exceptions; until ended by voters; generating approximately $600 million - $1.1 billion annually; be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 512808, "no_votes": 374934, "total_votes": 887742, "percent_yes": 57.76543184844245, "percent_no": 42.23456815155755, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance implements a 4% tax on real property sales/transfers over $5 mi...", "summary_text": "The ordinance implements a 4% tax on real property sales/transfers over $5 million and 5.5% on those over $10 million to fund affordable housing programs and resources for tenants at risk of homelessness. The measure is expected to generate approximately $600 million to $1.1 billion annually until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.167494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.698301", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure ULA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2392, "fingerprint": "2022|202200211|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200211|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5d136d334f3d9f52", "measure_id": "202200211", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure readopting Manhattan Beach\u2019s existing: (1) prohibition of all commercial cannabis activities in the City; and (2) allowance of limited indoor cannabis cultivation consistent with state law, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11578, "no_votes": 5564, "total_votes": 17142, "percent_yes": 67.54171041885428, "percent_no": 32.45828958114572, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure readopted Manhattan Beach's existing ban on all commercial cannab...", "summary_text": "The measure readopted Manhattan Beach's existing ban on all commercial cannabis activities within the city while continuing to allow limited indoor cannabis cultivation as permitted under state law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.169625", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.699360", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2364, "fingerprint": "2022|202200188|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200188|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "09eb53cd330ef7e1", "measure_id": "202200188", "measure_letter": "VY", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure VY", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the City of Culver City Charter to allow Culver City residents aged 16 and 17, who are otherwise eligible to vote under state and local law, to vote on City and School District candidates and ballot measures, provided that each legislative body has approved budgetary funds and determined logistical systems are in place, and that inclusion would not prevent consolidation of City or School District elections with county elections, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8293, "no_votes": 8309, "total_votes": 16602, "percent_yes": 49.95181303457415, "percent_no": 50.04818696542585, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.154053", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.693718", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure VY", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2370, "fingerprint": "2022|202200193|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200193|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "48ef657ce068974e", "measure_id": "202200193", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to repeal the City\u2019s current prohibition on commercial cannabis activities to authorize commercial cannabis retailers east of Pacific Coast Highway in the Multimedia Overlay District by right, if no less than 1,750 square feet, with sensitive receptor buffers and away from major arterial frontages, subject to a City permitting process; and authorize the City Council to subsequently regulate non-retail cannabis businesses?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3058, "no_votes": 4027, "total_votes": 7085, "percent_yes": 43.161609033168666, "percent_no": 56.838390966831334, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would have repealed Los Angeles's prohibition on commercial ca...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would have repealed Los Angeles's prohibition on commercial cannabis activities to allow cannabis retailers in a specific area east of Pacific Coast Highway, subject to size and location requirements, and would have given the City Council authority to regulate other cannabis businesses.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.156053", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.694791", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2422, "fingerprint": "2022|202200237|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200237|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ee810bb01f0220ae", "measure_id": "202200237", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, permitting/regulating limited cannabis businesses (5 dispensaries, 2 cultivation, 1 testing facility, 2 manufactures/distributors); regulating personal cannabis use; establishing a maximum 6% special excise tax on retail cannabis/edibles sales generating approximately $126,000 annually until ended by voters for implementation costs, clinical trials, municipalities where cannabis business are located, senior/youth programs, infrastructure (streets/roads/sidewalks), public safety (sheriffs/fire department), existing/future commercial, industrial, and affordable housing developments, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1132, "no_votes": 1326, "total_votes": 2458, "percent_yes": 46.053702196908056, "percent_no": 53.946297803091944, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.179641", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.704762", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2371, "fingerprint": "2022|202200194|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200194|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c59896039bf05202", "measure_id": "202200194", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance (a \u201cyes\u201d vote taxing cannabis does \u201cnot\u201d make cannabis businesses legal in El Segundo; it creates a tax in case a cannabis business ever becomes legal) funding general municipal expenses such as police, fire, streets, and parks, by establishing taxes upon cannabis businesses not to exceed $20 per square foot for cultivation and 10% of gross receipts for other cannabis businesses, until ended by voters, generating approximately $600,000 to $1,500,000 annually, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5163, "no_votes": 1929, "total_votes": 7092, "percent_yes": 72.80033840947546, "percent_no": 27.199661590524542, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes taxes on cannabis businesses in El Segundo of up to ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes taxes on cannabis businesses in El Segundo of up to $20 per square foot for cultivation and 10% of gross receipts for other cannabis operations, even though cannabis businesses are not currently legal in the city. The measure would generate an estimated $600,000 to $1,500,000 annually for general municipal expenses if cannabis businesses ever become legal in El Segundo.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.156443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.694951", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2410, "fingerprint": "2022|202200226|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200226|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "62ad6750092e9be7", "measure_id": "202200226", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to levy an annual special parcel tax on specified vacant commercial and residential properties within the City of San Marino to fund public safety services (including police, fire protection, and code enforcement), maintenance of school facilities and school staffing, in the flat amount of $10,000, estimated to generate $4,700,000 annually (assuming a 10% vacancy rate), subject to an annual cost of living increase, for ten years, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2652, "no_votes": 2101, "total_votes": 4753, "percent_yes": 55.79633915421839, "percent_no": 44.20366084578161, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a $10,000 annual special parcel tax on specifi...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a $10,000 annual special parcel tax on specified vacant commercial and residential properties in San Marino for ten years, with annual cost of living adjustments, to fund public safety services, school facility maintenance, and school staffing. The tax was projected to generate approximately $4.7 million annually based on an estimated 10% property vacancy rate.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.176154", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.702878", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2428, "fingerprint": "2022|202200478|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200478|MADERA", "content_hash": "04e3e56176448ddd", "measure_id": "202200478", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MADERA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the Firebaugh Center, including updating classroom technology, improving energy efficiency and water conservation and upgrading campus security shall West Hills Community College District's measure authorizing $25.1 million in short-term bonds be adopted with estimated levies of less than 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value (approximately $1,694,000 annually through 2039), legal interest rates, annual audits, citizens' oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, with all funds spent on local projects and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55, "no_votes": 47, "total_votes": 102, "percent_yes": 53.92156862745098, "percent_no": 46.07843137254902, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the West Hills Community College District ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the West Hills Community College District to issue $25.1 million in bonds to fund improvements at the Firebaugh Center, including classroom technology updates, energy efficiency improvements, water conservation measures, and campus security upgrades. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.182166", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.706041", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MADERA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2426, "fingerprint": "2022|202200477|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200477|MADERA", "content_hash": "a9d1b79a1f691436", "measure_id": "202200477", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MADERA Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct a career technical education center to expand programs including welding and construction; qualify for state matching funds; install new football, soccer, baseball and softball fields; and replace heating, air conditioning and ventilation systems, shall the Chowchilla Union High School District's measure authorizing $25.1 million in bonds be adopted with estimated levies of less than 3 \u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation (raising $1.3 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, legal interest rates, annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1368, "no_votes": 1002, "total_votes": 2370, "percent_yes": 57.72151898734177, "percent_no": 42.27848101265823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Chowchilla Union High School District to issue $25", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Chowchilla Union High School District to issue $25.1 million in bonds to construct a career technical education center, install new athletic fields, and replace HVAC systems. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $1.3 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.181409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.705712", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MADERA Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2427, "fingerprint": "2022|202200039|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200039|MADERA", "content_hash": "82b6aab7b3ce94fe", "measure_id": "202200039", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MADERA Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To keep local streets, highways, and infrastructure in good repair; fix potholes, pave/ maintain local streets; improve highway safety and 9-1- 1 emergency vehicle access; retrofit older bridges/ overpasses; complete other transportation projects; and qualify for $600,000,000 in State/ Federal matching funds, shall an ordinance be adopted continuing Madera County\u2019s voter- approved \u00bd\u00a2 sales tax without increasing the tax rate, renewing $20,000,000 annually until ended by voters, with citizen oversight/ independent audits and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18803, "no_votes": 17153, "total_votes": 35956, "percent_yes": 52.294471020135724, "percent_no": 47.705528979864276, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.181745", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.705873", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MADERA Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2436, "fingerprint": "2022|202200040|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200040|MARIN", "content_hash": "e17d20db29e0e5b3", "measure_id": "202200040", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain open space, parks, and sustainable agriculture, without increasing tax rates, shall the Marin County measure be adopted to: manage vegetation to reduce wildfire risk and preserve biodiversity; protect streams, baylands, natural areas, wildlife habitat; maintain park facilities; and maintain/ enhance walking, hiking, biking, and equestrian trails; by re-implementing an existing one-quarter cent sales tax, providing $14,000,000 annually, for 9 years, that the state cannot take away, with citizens\u2019 oversight and audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61003, "no_votes": 20626, "total_votes": 81629, "percent_yes": 74.7320192578618, "percent_no": 25.267980742138207, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Land Use: Open Space", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure re-implements an existing quarter-cent sales tax in Marin County...", "summary_text": "This measure re-implements an existing quarter-cent sales tax in Marin County for nine years to fund open space preservation, wildfire risk reduction, park maintenance, and trail enhancement, generating approximately $14 million annually. The measure maintains the current tax rate rather than increasing it and includes provisions for citizen oversight and audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.185610", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.707435", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11055, "fingerprint": "2022|202200482|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200482|MARIN", "content_hash": "7db0877db1765e0f", "measure_id": "202200482", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize high schools in San Rafael and Terra Linda, including: updating science labs, technology and career/ job training classrooms for current educational standards; updating classrooms for arts/ music; and updating classrooms/ facilities for health, safety and wellness; shall San Rafael City High School District\u2019s measure to issue $216,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, providing approximately $11,100,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, averaging 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, with independent oversight, annual audits, and all funds improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13767, "no_votes": 6528, "total_votes": 20295, "percent_yes": 67.83444198078344, "percent_no": 32.16555801921656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Rafael City High School District to issue $21...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Rafael City High School District to issue $216 million in bonds to modernize high schools in San Rafael and Terra Linda, including updates to science labs, technology classrooms, career training facilities, arts and music spaces, and health and safety infrastructure. The bonds would cost approximately $11.1 million annually while outstanding, averaging 3 cents per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.272265", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.188300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.708866", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2437, "fingerprint": "2022|202200043|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200043|MARIN", "content_hash": "ba9fa4655db1977c", "measure_id": "202200043", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide critical funding, that can\u2019t be taken by the State, to: maintain library hours and 24/7 online library access; enhance programs for children, teens, adults, seniors; increase book/digital collections; provide free internet access and computers; upgrade library facilities; shall the Marin County Free Library measure be adopted increasing the currently approved library parcel tax to $98 a year, providing $4.7 million dollars annually, for 9 years, with annual adjustments, independent citizen oversight and senior citizen exemptions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46796, "no_votes": 14301, "total_votes": 61097, "percent_yes": 76.5929587377449, "percent_no": 23.407041262255106, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases the existing Marin County Free Library parcel tax to $9...", "summary_text": "The measure increases the existing Marin County Free Library parcel tax to $98 annually for 9 years, generating approximately $4.7 million per year to fund library operations, programs, collections, and facility upgrades. The tax includes annual adjustments, independent oversight, and exemptions for senior citizens.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.185929", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.707597", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11054, "fingerprint": "2022|202200481|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200481|MARIN", "content_hash": "ce99bbf5b0a3b3e9", "measure_id": "202200481", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize San Rafael elementary and middle school classrooms, including: updating classrooms/ classroom technology for current educational standards; replacing aging portables; and updating classrooms, facilities and air filtration/ HVAC systems for health, safety and wellness; shall San Rafael City Elementary School District\u2019s measure to issue $152,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, providing approximately $8,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding averaging 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8562, "no_votes": 4212, "total_votes": 12774, "percent_yes": 67.02677313292625, "percent_no": 32.97322686707375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Rafael City Elementary School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Rafael City Elementary School District to issue $152 million in bonds to modernize elementary and middle school facilities, including updating classrooms and technology, replacing aging portable buildings, and improving HVAC and air filtration systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $8 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.272080", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.187992", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.708705", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2439, "fingerprint": "2022|202200483|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200483|MARIN", "content_hash": "48bb9a1d01502c30", "measure_id": "202200483", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue to support high quality, innovative academic programs; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; maintain low student-to-teacher ratios; support the visual and performing arts and technology integration; maintain facilities; and offset funding cuts by the State; shall the Ross School District measure renewing its education parcel tax at $1550 per parcel with 3% annual adjustments, providing $1.27 million annually for ten years, be adopted, with senior exemptions and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1107, "no_votes": 299, "total_votes": 1406, "percent_yes": 78.73399715504978, "percent_no": 21.266002844950222, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure renews a parcel tax of $1,550 per property with 3% annual increas...", "summary_text": "The measure renews a parcel tax of $1,550 per property with 3% annual increases for ten years to provide $1.27 million annually to the Ross School District for educational programs, teacher retention, facilities maintenance, and other school operations. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and all revenue remains within the local district.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.186828", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.708075", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2429, "fingerprint": "2022|202200243|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200243|MARIN", "content_hash": "e4e31a0a54f7956d", "measure_id": "202200243", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To advance public safety; strengthen infrastructure against earthquakes; support fire suppression; safeguard water, sewer and other utilities; secure evacuation routes; and provide other general services, shall the measure establishing Belvedere as a Charter City and enacting a real estate property transfer tax of $8 per $1,000 to be paid by buyers or sellers of real property, providing $1,600,000 annually, to end in 30 years or less, with audits and citizen oversight, benefiting Belvedere, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 560, "no_votes": 708, "total_votes": 1268, "percent_yes": 44.164037854889585, "percent_no": 55.835962145110415, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established Belvedere as a charter city and enacted a ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have established Belvedere as a charter city and enacted a real estate transfer tax of $8 per $1,000 of property value, generating approximately $1.6 million annually for 30 years to fund public safety, infrastructure, utilities, and general services. The tax would have been paid by either buyers or sellers during property transactions and included provisions for audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.182527", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.706202", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11050, "fingerprint": "2022|202200479|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200479|MARIN", "content_hash": "3c4d2350ab5eb2fd", "measure_id": "202200479", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers/ staff; keeping school facilities safe/ clean/ well-maintained; supporting programs in math, science, technology, engineering, reading and writing; and maintaining small class sizes, shall Larkspur-Corte Madera School District\u2019s measure renewing the expiring school parcel tax at the existing rate of $910 per parcel for 10 years be adopted, with annual adjustments, senior exemptions, independent oversight, and continuing $4,000,000 in annual school funding that cannot be taken away by the state?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4247, "no_votes": 1249, "total_votes": 5496, "percent_yes": 77.27438136826783, "percent_no": 22.725618631732175, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing $910 annual parcel tax in the Larkspur-Corte...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing $910 annual parcel tax in the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District for 10 years to fund teacher retention, facility maintenance, academic programs, and small class sizes. The measure included annual adjustments, senior exemptions, and independent oversight for approximately $4 million in annual school funding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.270360", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.185242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.707272", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2431, "fingerprint": "2022|202200244|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200244|MARIN", "content_hash": "598407211040a989", "measure_id": "202200244", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times and preserve the number of on-duty paramedics ready to respond to accidents/medical emergencies, shall the measure continuing the paramedic services special tax for four years at an annual amount of $78 per residence and per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal years 2023-2024, and thereafter increased $3 per year up to $87, generating approximately $504,400 annually for local paramedic services, subject to annual audits and public spending disclosure, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3824, "no_votes": 870, "total_votes": 4694, "percent_yes": 81.46570089475927, "percent_no": 18.534299105240734, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Emergency Medical/Paramedic", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues a special tax in Marin County for four years to fund p...", "summary_text": "This measure continues a special tax in Marin County for four years to fund paramedic services, charging $78 annually per residence and per 1,000 square feet for nonresidential properties, with the rate increasing by $3 per year up to $87. The tax is expected to generate approximately $504,400 annually for local paramedic services and includes provisions for annual audits and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.183429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.706515", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2433, "fingerprint": "2022|202200245|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200245|MARIN", "content_hash": "f73d23ef4c2e5595", "measure_id": "202200245", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times and the number of on-duty paramedics to respond to accidents/medical emergencies, shall the measure continuing the paramedic services special tax for four years at an increased annual amount of $94.50 per residence and per 1,500 square feet of non-residential floor area for fiscal years 2023-24, and thereafter increased $3 per year up to $103.50, generating approximately $353,000 annually for local paramedic services be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3320, "no_votes": 739, "total_votes": 4059, "percent_yes": 81.79354520817935, "percent_no": 18.206454791820647, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Emergency Medical/Paramedic", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues a special tax for paramedic services in Marin, Califor...", "summary_text": "This measure continues a special tax for paramedic services in Marin, California for four years, starting at $94.50 annually per residence and per 1,500 square feet of non-residential space in 2023-24, with $3 annual increases up to $103.50. The tax would generate approximately $353,000 annually to fund local paramedic services and maintain emergency response times.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.184238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.706812", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11051, "fingerprint": "2022|202200480|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200480|MARIN", "content_hash": "a75aa58839f6ce2a", "measure_id": "202200480", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs and learning technology in Mill Valley elementary and middle schools; repair/replace leaky roofs/windows, improve accessibility for students with disabilities; add solar and replace outdated/inefficient heating, ventilation, electrical/plumbing systems; shall Mill Valley School District\u2019s measure to issue $194,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, raising approximately $9,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding averaging 2.6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, with oversight, annual audits and all funds improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7848, "no_votes": 3627, "total_votes": 11475, "percent_yes": 68.3921568627451, "percent_no": 31.607843137254903, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Mill Valley School District to issue $194 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Mill Valley School District to issue $194 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and lab upgrades, roof and window repairs, accessibility improvements, solar installations, and HVAC/electrical/plumbing system replacements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging 2.6 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising approximately $9.3 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.270927", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.186229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.707760", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2435, "fingerprint": "2022|202200246|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200246|MARIN", "content_hash": "9ddce724c86a65e8", "measure_id": "202200246", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain city services, such as disaster/emergency preparedness, 9-1-1 emergency/medical response, clearing hazardous brush; repairing/maintaining storm drains to prevent flooding, road damage and spills of contaminated water; maintain streets, parks, and general government use; shall the measure establishing a \u00bc-cent sales tax, providing approximately $700,000 annually, until ended by voters, and requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3565, "no_votes": 2410, "total_votes": 5975, "percent_yes": 59.6652719665272, "percent_no": 40.3347280334728, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.184961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.707112", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11052, "fingerprint": "2022|202200247|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200247|MARIN", "content_hash": "ac42b90e056de414", "measure_id": "202200247", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue expiring funding for San Anselmo Library to maintain library operating hours; increase book/ebook collections; maintain programs for children, families, seniors/people with disabilities; and maintain free internet access, computers/technology, shall the measure be adopted extending the existing San Anselmo library services tax at the existing rate of $70 per parcel, providing $320,000 annually, for nine years, with annual adjustments, mandatory audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds locally controlled for San Anselmo Library?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5865, "no_votes": 1039, "total_votes": 6904, "percent_yes": 84.95075318655852, "percent_no": 15.049246813441485, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends an existing $70 per parcel property tax for nine years t...", "summary_text": "This measure extends an existing $70 per parcel property tax for nine years to fund San Anselmo Library operations, generating approximately $320,000 annually for library hours, collections, programs, and technology services. The measure continues expiring funding at the same tax rate with provisions for annual adjustments, audits, and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.271704", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.187417", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.708379", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2434, "fingerprint": "2022|202200240|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200240|MARIN", "content_hash": "e11fc816145c936c", "measure_id": "202200240", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times and preserve the number of on-duty paramedics ready to respond to accidents/ medical emergencies, shall the Ross Valley Paramedic Authority measure be adopted continuing for four years the paramedic services special tax of $94.50 per residential living unit or 1,500 square feet of developed nonresidential property, adjusted up to $3 per year, generating approximately $680,000 annually, subject to annual audits, public spending disclosure and all funds for local paramedic services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3657, "no_votes": 808, "total_votes": 4465, "percent_yes": 81.9036954087346, "percent_no": 18.096304591265394, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Emergency Medical/Paramedic", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues a special tax of $94", "summary_text": "This measure continues a special tax of $94.50 per residential unit or per 1,500 square feet of nonresidential property for four years to fund paramedic services in the Ross Valley area of Marin County. The tax can be adjusted upward by up to $3 per year and is expected to generate approximately $680,000 annually for local emergency medical services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.184679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.706962", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2438, "fingerprint": "2022|202200241|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200241|MARIN", "content_hash": "169e205e3fa7fbe9", "measure_id": "202200241", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times and preserve the number of on-duty paramedics ready to respond to accidents/ medical emergencies, shall the Ross Valley Paramedic Authority measure be adopted continuing for four years the paramedic services special tax of $94.50 per residential living unit or 1,500 square feet of developed nonresidential property, adjusted up to $3 per year, generating approximately $93,000 annually, subject to annual audits, public spending disclosure and all funds for local paramedic services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 776, "no_votes": 116, "total_votes": 892, "percent_yes": 86.99551569506725, "percent_no": 13.004484304932745, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Emergency Medical/Paramedic", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues a special tax of $94", "summary_text": "This measure continues a special tax of $94.50 per residential unit or per 1,500 square feet of nonresidential property for four years to fund paramedic services in the Ross Valley area, with annual adjustments up to $3 per year. The tax is expected to generate approximately $93,000 annually for local emergency medical services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.186529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.707926", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11053, "fingerprint": "2022|202200248|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200248|MARIN", "content_hash": "1ee77467341dfac4", "measure_id": "202200248", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and enhance general Town of San Anselmo services and facilities such as repairing potholes, repaving roads, improving drought resilience, maintaining 9-1-1 emergency firefighter and paramedic response times, and improving fire protection, shall the Town of San Anselmo ordinance be adopted extending the existing voter-approved \u00bd\u00a2 sales tax for nine years and increasing the rate to 1\u00a2, providing $2,400,000 annually for general government use, requiring independent citizen oversight, annual audits and all funds staying in San Anselmo under local control?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5113, "no_votes": 1733, "total_votes": 6846, "percent_yes": 74.68594799883144, "percent_no": 25.314052001168562, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends San Anselmo's existing half-cent sales tax for nine year...", "summary_text": "This measure extends San Anselmo's existing half-cent sales tax for nine years while doubling the rate to one cent, generating approximately $2.4 million annually for general municipal services including road repairs, emergency services, and fire protection. The measure requires independent citizen oversight and annual audits, with all funds remaining under local control.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.271894", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.187696", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.708545", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2440, "fingerprint": "2022|202200242|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200242|MARIN", "content_hash": "50b5d93ad4fd3e7b", "measure_id": "202200242", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times and preserve the number of on-duty paramedics ready to respond to accidents/ medical emergencies, shall the Ross Valley Paramedic Authority measure be adopted continuing for four years the paramedic services special tax of $94.50 per residential living unit or 1,500 square feet of developed nonresidential property, adjusted up to $3 per year, generating approximately $560,000 annually, subject to annual audits, public spending disclosure and all funds for local paramedic services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3745, "no_votes": 857, "total_votes": 4602, "percent_yes": 81.37766188613647, "percent_no": 18.622338113863535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Emergency Medical/Paramedic", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues a four-year special tax of $94", "summary_text": "This measure continues a four-year special tax of $94.50 per residential unit or per 1,500 square feet of nonresidential property for the Ross Valley Paramedic Authority, with annual increases of up to $3, generating approximately $560,000 per year. The funds are designated for maintaining local paramedic services and emergency response capabilities.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.187141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.708229", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2441, "fingerprint": "2022|202200249|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200249|MARIN", "content_hash": "4b890d71dacc7e8a", "measure_id": "202200249", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure repealing the existing ban on cannabis sales in the City of Sausalito, establishing an application process for retail cannabis businesses; giving preference to local applicants that expressed interest in operating a cannabis business before April 1, 2021; authorizing one storefront and one delivery-only cannabis business; regulating the operations and location of cannabis businesses; and requiring payment to the City of the greater of 7.5% net profits or $50,000 per year, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1065, "no_votes": 2960, "total_votes": 4025, "percent_yes": 26.459627329192546, "percent_no": 73.54037267080746, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have repealed Sausalito's ban on cannabis sales and allowed...", "summary_text": "The measure would have repealed Sausalito's ban on cannabis sales and allowed up to two cannabis businesses (one storefront and one delivery-only) to operate in the city, with an application process giving preference to certain local applicants and requiring businesses to pay the city either 7.5% of net profits or $50,000 annually, whichever is greater.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.188572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.709030", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2442, "fingerprint": "2022|202200250|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200250|MARIN", "content_hash": "df36cc5171332a6f", "measure_id": "202200250", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain the City\u2019s long-term financial viability and improve local quality of life and essential services including storm drain repairs to protect the Bay, street/sidewalk maintenance, pothole repair, parks maintenance, youth/senior programs, disabled access, public safety, and other general services, shall the City of Sausalito extend and raise the sales tax rate to 1% starting April 1, 2023 for ten years, providing $2.8 million annually, requiring independent financial audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2738, "no_votes": 1224, "total_votes": 3962, "percent_yes": 69.10651186269561, "percent_no": 30.893488137304388, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure extends and raises Sausalito's sales tax rate to 1% for ten years...", "summary_text": "The measure extends and raises Sausalito's sales tax rate to 1% for ten years starting April 1, 2023, generating approximately $2.8 million annually for general city services including infrastructure maintenance, parks, public safety, and community programs. The measure requires independent financial audits and passed with 50.7% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.188870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.709180", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2430, "fingerprint": "2022|202200041|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200041|MARIN", "content_hash": "8e6bb4177a59f1bd", "measure_id": "202200041", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Marin County Open Space District Community Facilities District No. 2022-1 be authorized to (i) issue $23,000,000 in bonds to pay costs to acquire the \u201cMartha Property\u201d on the Tiburon Peninsula and prepay open space bonds, and (ii) levy an annual special tax until the bonds are repaid of $335 increasing 2% annually to initially raise approximately $1,065,000 annually, repay bonds and pay costs of vegetation management for the Martha Property and Old St. Hillary\u2019s Open Space Preserve and District administration, and shall the District\u2019s initial appropriations limit be $3,000,000?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3292, "no_votes": 885, "total_votes": 4177, "percent_yes": 78.81254488867609, "percent_no": 21.187455111323914, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": "Land Use: Open Space", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Marin County Open Space District to issue $23 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Marin County Open Space District to issue $23 million in bonds to acquire the \"Martha Property\" on the Tiburon Peninsula and prepay existing open space bonds, funded by an annual special tax of $335 per parcel that increases 2% annually. The tax revenue would be used to repay the bonds and cover costs for vegetation management of the Martha Property and Old St. Hillary's Open Space Preserve, along with district administration expenses.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.182985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.706352", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2432, "fingerprint": "2022|202200042|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200042|MARIN", "content_hash": "3783343529be9d47", "measure_id": "202200042", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times and preserve the number of on-duty paramedics ready to respond to accidents/medical emergencies, shall the Ross Valley Paramedic Authority measure be adopted continuing for four years the paramedic services special tax of $94.50 per residential living unit or 1,500 square feet of developed nonresidential property, adjusted up to $3 per year, generating approximately $69,000 annually, subject to annual audits, public spending disclosure and all funds for local paramedic services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 728, "no_votes": 173, "total_votes": 901, "percent_yes": 80.79911209766925, "percent_no": 19.20088790233075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Emergency Medical/Paramedic", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues a four-year special tax of $94", "summary_text": "This measure continues a four-year special tax of $94.50 per residential unit or per 1,500 square feet of nonresidential property to fund paramedic services in the Ross Valley area, with annual adjustments of up to $3 and generating approximately $69,000 per year. The measure passed with voter approval to maintain emergency response capabilities and paramedic staffing levels.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.183822", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.706664", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2443, "fingerprint": "2022|202200484|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200484|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "05f33f15948e5489", "measure_id": "202200484", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MENDOCINO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renovate classrooms; upgrade agricultural program facilities; repair or replace roofs, water infrastructure, heating and air conditioning systems; construct an elementary school multipurpose room; and improve student safety, shall Anderson Valley Unified School District's measure authorizing $13,000,000 in bonds be adopted with legal interest rates, estimated levies of less that 6 cents per $100 assessed value (raising $724,579 annually) while bonds are outstanding, annual independent audits, citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 538, "no_votes": 206, "total_votes": 744, "percent_yes": 72.31182795698925, "percent_no": 27.688172043010752, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Anderson Valley Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Anderson Valley Unified School District to issue $13 million in bonds to renovate classrooms, upgrade agricultural facilities, repair infrastructure systems, construct an elementary school multipurpose room, and improve student safety. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies estimated at less than 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising approximately $724,579 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.189170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.709342", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MENDOCINO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2444, "fingerprint": "2022|202200044|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200044|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "e12d1cc2eeb2a76f", "measure_id": "202200044", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MENDOCINO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Citizens of Mendocino County amend Chapter 5.170 of Title 5 of Mendocino County Code, adopting a permanent one-quarter cent (0.25%) sales tax, raising approximately $4.2 million annually, for the specific purpose of maintaining and improving library services in Mendocino County; and reate a special fund to ensure these funds cannot be used for any other purpose. At least 40% is reserved for capital investments such as builing improvements.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18165, "no_votes": 11703, "total_votes": 29868, "percent_yes": 60.81759742868622, "percent_no": 39.18240257131378, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a permanent 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a permanent 0.25% sales tax in Mendocino County to generate approximately $4.2 million annually for maintaining and improving library services, with at least 40% reserved for capital investments like building improvements. The funds are placed in a special fund that cannot be used for other purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.189440", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.709494", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MENDOCINO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2445, "fingerprint": "2022|202200045|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200045|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "5ba79bd204b3e92d", "measure_id": "202200045", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MENDOCINO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 4510 be adopted to impose as general tax, an additional transactions (sales) and use tax of one quarter cent (0.25%) within Mendocino County to fund essential services, including fire protection and prevention? Such tax is estimated to raise $4,000,000 annually for ten (10) years, after which it will expire.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16468, "no_votes": 13330, "total_votes": 29798, "percent_yes": 55.26545405731929, "percent_no": 44.73454594268071, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed an additional 0", "summary_text": "This measure imposed an additional 0.25% sales and use tax in Mendocino County to fund essential services including fire protection and prevention. The tax was set to raise an estimated $4 million annually for ten years before expiring.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.189738", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.709644", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MENDOCINO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2448, "fingerprint": "2022|202200486|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200486|MERCED", "content_hash": "b8f68ee7f832d2b5", "measure_id": "202200486", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct and modernize classrooms, improve student and staff safety and security at all sites, increase teacher and student access to modern classroom technology, and provide support facilities for student and community use, shall Planada Elementary School District\u2019s measure to issue $3,100,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, raising approximately $205,000 annually while bonds are outstanding averaging 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and all funds improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 401, "no_votes": 195, "total_votes": 596, "percent_yes": 67.28187919463086, "percent_no": 32.71812080536914, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Planada Elementary School District to issue $3", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Planada Elementary School District to issue $3.1 million in bonds to construct and modernize classrooms, improve safety and security, upgrade technology access, and provide student and community support facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising approximately $205,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.190665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.710119", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2446, "fingerprint": "2022|202200251|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200251|MERCED", "content_hash": "1fd61cb2fb5feece", "measure_id": "202200251", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prevent drastic cuts to Atwater\u2019s public safety services, including elimination of Atwater\u2019s Police Department; maintain emergency heart attack/stroke response times, medical services, fire protection, neighborhood police patrols, police officer training; investigate violent crimes; shall the City of Atwater adopt a measure renewing its existing, voter-approved sales tax at the 1\u00a2 rate, providing $4,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits, oversight/all funds only for Atwater?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4721, "no_votes": 1683, "total_votes": 6404, "percent_yes": 73.71955028107433, "percent_no": 26.280449718925667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would renew Atwater's existing 1-cent sales tax to provide appro...", "summary_text": "This measure would renew Atwater's existing 1-cent sales tax to provide approximately $4 million annually for public safety services including police, fire, and emergency medical services. The tax would continue indefinitely until ended by voters and includes requirements for audits and oversight with funds restricted to Atwater use only.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.190047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.709794", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2447, "fingerprint": "2022|202200485|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200485|MERCED", "content_hash": "27d0d2009ba8380c", "measure_id": "202200485", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MERCED Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct/modernize classrooms, labs, athletic spaces and other school facilities; replace outdated infrastructure; upgrade inadequate facilities; and improve the quality of education; shall Merced River School District\u2019s measure be adopted to issue $3,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, estimated levies of approximately 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, generating on average $230,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36, "no_votes": 109, "total_votes": 145, "percent_yes": 24.82758620689655, "percent_no": 75.17241379310344, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Merced River School District to issue $3", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Merced River School District to issue $3.5 million in bonds to construct and modernize school facilities including classrooms, labs, and athletic spaces, funded by an estimated property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value. The bonds would have included provisions for annual audits, citizen oversight, and restrictions preventing the funds from being used for salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.190368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.709957", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MERCED Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2457, "fingerprint": "2022|202200046|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200046|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "8cb7e68647d04513", "measure_id": "202200046", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Pacific Grove Municipal Code be amended to increase the City\u2019s current 1% transactions and use tax to 1.5%, until amended by subsequent vote, as a general tax to generate an estimated $1,126,000 or $1.1 million annually, to fund capital needs; maintain public safety and emergency preparation; enhance City infrastructure including roads, parks, trees, trails, and beaches, and invest in community facilities; and provide general City services, with all revenues requiring an annual independent audit?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2411, "no_votes": 1604, "total_votes": 4015, "percent_yes": 60.049813200498136, "percent_no": 39.950186799501864, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would increase Pacific Grove's sales tax from 1% to 1", "summary_text": "This measure would increase Pacific Grove's sales tax from 1% to 1.5% to generate approximately $1.1 million annually for general city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and community facilities. The tax would remain in effect until changed by a future vote and would require annual independent audits.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-04-12", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.193393", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.711541", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2450, "fingerprint": "2022|202200252|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200252|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "47e75dddabb9a9ec", "measure_id": "202200252", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Del Rey Oaks be prohibited from agreeing to or constructing any tunnel, including the one proposed by FORTAG under Highway 218 for access to the Frog Pond Wetland Preserve, and be limited to the use of Highway 218, General Jim Moore Blvd. and South Boundary Rd. for the construction or routing of any formal bike trails, or recreation trails within the City of Del Rey Oaks unless otherwise approved by the voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 387, "no_votes": 399, "total_votes": 786, "percent_yes": 49.23664122137404, "percent_no": 50.76335877862596, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited the City of Del Rey Oaks from constructing...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited the City of Del Rey Oaks from constructing any tunnels, including a proposed tunnel under Highway 218 for wetland preserve access, and restricted formal bike and recreation trail construction to three specific roads unless voters approve otherwise.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.191360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.710446", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2463, "fingerprint": "2022|202200487|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200487|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "77b7ab15a1d05710", "measure_id": "202200487", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct a new track and shade structures, replace portable classrooms and improve other school facilities; replace outdated infrastructure; and improve the quality of education; shall San Lucas Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted to issue $3,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, estimated levies of approximately 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, generating on average $240,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual reports, no money for salaries and all money improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22, "no_votes": 15, "total_votes": 37, "percent_yes": 59.45945945945946, "percent_no": 40.54054054054054, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the San Lucas Union School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the San Lucas Union School District to issue $3.6 million in bonds to construct a new track and shade structures, replace portable classrooms, and upgrade school infrastructure. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.195125", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.712481", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2452, "fingerprint": "2022|202200253|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200253|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "34db43ebe7b1b507", "measure_id": "202200253", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure establishing a Special Temporary Gonzales Transactions and Use Tax at the rate of one-half percent (0.5%) for a term of 40 years through 2062, with all funds initially used exclusively for financing and funding the Gonzales Community Center Complex Project, and thereafter, upon full funding of the Complex, exclusively for street maintenance and repair, be adopted? The special tax would generate an estimated $750,000.00 annually.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 257, "no_votes": 245, "total_votes": 502, "percent_yes": 51.19521912350598, "percent_no": 48.80478087649402, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Museum/Cultural/Comm Ctrs", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 0.5% sales tax in Gonzales for 40 years to initially fund a community center complex project and later for street maintenance and repair, generating an estimated $750,000 annually. The measure failed at the ballot.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-08-30", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.191950", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.710759", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2451, "fingerprint": "2022|202200047|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200047|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d5eec5d84a0856dd", "measure_id": "202200047", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Board of Directors of the East Garrison Community Services District (currently the Monterey County Board of Supervisors) be changed to a Board of Directors with five (5) directors elected at large by registered voters of the District with such directors taking office on the first Friday in December 2022?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 284, "no_votes": 589, "total_votes": 873, "percent_yes": 32.531500572737684, "percent_no": 67.46849942726232, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have changed the East Garrison Community Services District'...", "summary_text": "The measure would have changed the East Garrison Community Services District's governing board from the Monterey County Board of Supervisors to five directors elected at-large by district voters. The new directors would have taken office in December 2022.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.191655", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.710606", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2461, "fingerprint": "2022|202200489|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200489|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "049579ace30b3dac", "measure_id": "202200489", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Salinas City Elementary School District\u2019s measure to replace deteriorating roofs; repair leaking pipes and outdated plumbing; renovate classrooms; and replace aging electrical wiring be adopted authorizing $74.5 million of bonds with legal rates, levies below $30/ $100,000 of assessed valuation (averaging $3.9 million/ year while bonds are outstanding), annual audits, independent citizen oversight and eligibility for state matching funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9070, "no_votes": 5442, "total_votes": 14512, "percent_yes": 62.5, "percent_no": 37.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Salinas City Elementary School District to issue $74", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Salinas City Elementary School District to issue $74.5 million in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including roof replacements, plumbing repairs, classroom renovations, and electrical system upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.194547", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.712151", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2462, "fingerprint": "2022|202200490|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200490|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "754a4ab42a04fc65", "measure_id": "202200490", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Salinas City Elementary School District\u2019s measure to improve emergency communications and security systems; update classroom technology; replace aging playgrounds; and increase handicapped access be adopted authorizing $75 million of bonds with legal rates, levies below $30/$100,000 of assessed valuation (averaging $4.0 million/ year while bonds are outstanding), annual audits, independent citizen oversight and eligibility for state matching funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8852, "no_votes": 5627, "total_votes": 14479, "percent_yes": 61.136818841080185, "percent_no": 38.863181158919815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Salinas City Elementary School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Salinas City Elementary School District to issue $75 million in bonds to improve emergency communications and security systems, update classroom technology, replace aging playgrounds, and increase handicapped access. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies below $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.194829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.712313", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2454, "fingerprint": "2022|202200255|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200255|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b07166d28787609f", "measure_id": "202200255", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure increasing the City of King\u2019s current one percent local sales tax to one and one-half percent to generate an estimated increase of $1,200,000 annually for general revenue purposes, such as public safety, street improvements, maintenance of City parks and facilities, recreation programs and establishing an emergency reserve subject to citizen oversight, an annual audit, and expiration of the entire tax in 10 years be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 586, "no_votes": 655, "total_votes": 1241, "percent_yes": 47.219983883964545, "percent_no": 52.780016116035455, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased the City of King's local sales tax from 1% to 1", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased the City of King's local sales tax from 1% to 1.5% to generate approximately $1.2 million annually for general city services including public safety, street improvements, parks maintenance, and recreation programs. The tax would have been subject to citizen oversight and annual audits, with the entire tax expiring after 10 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.192526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.711075", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2455, "fingerprint": "2022|202200256|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200256|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "e7e95e742ac0fb76", "measure_id": "202200256", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to impose an annual cannabis (marijuana) business license tax of up to 8% of gross receipts from retail businesses, 2% of gross receipts from testing laboratories, and 6% of gross receipts from other cannabis businesses, with an additional tax on highly potent products, generating about $604,000 to $1.3 million a year, with all funds staying local and subject to audit, and effective until repealed by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6316, "no_votes": 3372, "total_votes": 9688, "percent_yes": 65.19405450041288, "percent_no": 34.805945499587125, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed an annual cannabis business license tax in Monterey with...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed an annual cannabis business license tax in Monterey with rates up to 8% of gross receipts for retail businesses, 2% for testing laboratories, and 6% for other cannabis businesses, plus an additional tax on highly potent products. The tax was estimated to generate $604,000 to $1.3 million annually for local use and remains effective until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.192826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.711235", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2466, "fingerprint": "2022|202200492|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200492|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b87bc4514ecc2d37", "measure_id": "202200492", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; improve security, safety and handicapped accessibility; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall Washington Union School District issue $13,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $833,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 1.8 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all funds used for district projects?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2177, "no_votes": 1836, "total_votes": 4013, "percent_yes": 54.24869175180663, "percent_no": 45.75130824819337, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized Washington Union School District to issue $13", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized Washington Union School District to issue $13.5 million in bonds to modernize classrooms and school facilities, improve safety and accessibility, and repair infrastructure like roofs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 1.8 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.196085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.712967", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2464, "fingerprint": "2022|202200260|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200260|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "ee463a7e147bf234", "measure_id": "202200260", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To enhance Sand City\u2019s infrastructure including roads, sidewalks, parks, trees, trails, community arts, and beach access; maintain public safety and emergency preparation; invest in community facilities; and other general City services, shall the general tax measure be adopted, estimated to generate $1,400,000 annually in general fund revenue mainly from regional non-resident shoppers, by increasing Sand City\u2019s 1% transactions and use tax to 1.5%, until repealed by voters, and requiring an independent audit?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 90, "no_votes": 41, "total_votes": 131, "percent_yes": 68.70229007633588, "percent_no": 31.297709923664115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Sand City's sales tax from 1% to 1", "summary_text": "This measure increased Sand City's sales tax from 1% to 1.5% to fund infrastructure improvements, public safety, community facilities, and general city services, with an estimated annual revenue of $1,400,000 subject to independent audits. The tax increase remains in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.195503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.712641", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2458, "fingerprint": "2022|202200257|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200257|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b881c6b2925cd790", "measure_id": "202200257", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Should the Pacific Grove City Council be authorized to amend the Municipal Code to allow retail sales of medical or recreational cannabis, limited to one single location within the City, at a location no closer than 1000 feet from any existing licensed Daycare/Preschools, Youth Center, and Schools, to engage in commercial cannabis activities?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4347, "no_votes": 2731, "total_votes": 7078, "percent_yes": 61.41565413958745, "percent_no": 38.58434586041255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Pacific Grove City Council to allow retail sales ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Pacific Grove City Council to allow retail sales of medical and recreational cannabis at one location within the city, with restrictions requiring the location be at least 1000 feet away from daycares, preschools, youth centers, and schools.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.193692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.711703", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2459, "fingerprint": "2022|202200258|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200258|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a268b2ce87ef4454", "measure_id": "202200258", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, and for unrestricted general fund purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a City excise tax on cannabis businesses (which includes hemp) at an annual rate not to exceed 6% of gross receipts for retail and delivery cannabis businesses, which is expected to generate an estimated $300,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4926, "no_votes": 2029, "total_votes": 6955, "percent_yes": 70.82674335010783, "percent_no": 29.173256649892167, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established an annual excise tax on cannabis businesses in Monte...", "summary_text": "This measure established an annual excise tax on cannabis businesses in Monterey at a rate not to exceed 6% of gross receipts for retail and delivery operations, expected to generate approximately $300,000 annually for general municipal expenses. The tax will remain in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.193961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.711849", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2460, "fingerprint": "2022|202200259|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200259|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "0e15e6faf121d260", "measure_id": "202200259", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Pacific Grove City Charter requirement for six elected City Councilmembers be changed to four elected Councilmembers via this sequence: (1) in 2024 two Councilmembers shall be elected to four-year terms, and one shall be elected to a single two-year term, (2) every two years thereafter, beginning in 2026, two Councilmembers shall be elected to four-year terms, with other revisions for votes needed for a quorum, a majority vote and other select actions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3421, "no_votes": 3434, "total_votes": 6855, "percent_yes": 49.905178701677606, "percent_no": 50.094821298322394, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have reduced the Pacific Grove City Council from six elect...", "summary_text": "This measure would have reduced the Pacific Grove City Council from six elected members to four elected members, with a transition period starting in 2024 where some members would serve shorter initial terms before settling into a pattern of electing two councilmembers every two years to four-year terms. The measure also included corresponding changes to quorum and voting requirements to accommodate the smaller council size.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.194244", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.712001", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2453, "fingerprint": "2022|202200254|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200254|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "ae65bd0248664150", "measure_id": "202200254", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure to extend the term of the existing 1.0% Gonzales Temporary Transactions and Use Tax by twenty years, from 2044 to 2064, subject to continued independent audit and citizen\u2019s advisory committee review, with all funds dedicated exclusively to Gonzales programs, projects and initiatives, and that will generate an estimated $1,500,000 annually, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 602, "no_votes": 728, "total_votes": 1330, "percent_yes": 45.26315789473684, "percent_no": 54.73684210526316, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.192225", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.710912", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2456, "fingerprint": "2022|202200048|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200048|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b918a1c4dc07cdf8", "measure_id": "202200048", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an Initiative Measure to amend Title 5 of the Code of the County of Monterey to establish an annual special parcel tax in the amount of forty-nine ($49) dollars on each parcel located within Monterey County, for a period of ten (10) years, in order to establish childcare in Monterey County, with revenue generated in the estimated amount of $5.5 million annually used solely to increase and improve affordable childcare be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40850, "no_votes": 58533, "total_votes": 99383, "percent_yes": 41.10360926919091, "percent_no": 58.89639073080909, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a $49 annual parcel tax on all properties...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a $49 annual parcel tax on all properties in Monterey County for 10 years to fund childcare services, generating an estimated $5.5 million annually. The revenue would have been used exclusively to increase and improve affordable childcare in the county.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.193095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.711387", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2465, "fingerprint": "2022|202200491|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200491|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b1f27db7721f894c", "measure_id": "202200491", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize existing elementary and middle schools; provide state of the art classrooms; repair old facilities and infrastructure; and enhance safety/security; shall the Santa Rita Union Elementary School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 2022-1 measure authorizing $24,900,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying approximately 3\u00a2 per $100 and providing an estimated average $1,460,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, all funds staying local and NO money for administrators' salaries, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2675, "no_votes": 1733, "total_votes": 4408, "percent_yes": 60.685117967332125, "percent_no": 39.314882032667875, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Santa Rita Union Elementary School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Santa Rita Union Elementary School District to issue $24,900,000 in bonds to modernize elementary and middle schools, repair facilities and infrastructure, and enhance safety and security. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.195794", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.712801", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2449, "fingerprint": "2022|202200488|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200488|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "6a5ddad041cd8cf1", "measure_id": "202200488", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; construct, modernize, and upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; renovate plumbing; improve drinking water; make safety/security improvements; and replace roofs; shall Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $39,200,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,700,000 annually at a projected average rate less than 5 cents per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent oversight, no money for salaries, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7, "no_votes": 4, "total_votes": 11, "percent_yes": 63.63636363636363, "percent_no": 36.36363636363637, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District to issue $39,200,000 in bonds to construct, modernize, and upgrade school facilities including classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, drinking water systems, safety/security features, and roofs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a projected average rate of less than 5 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.190973", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.710279", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2472, "fingerprint": "2022|202200495|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200495|NAPA", "content_hash": "8eea654716925c25", "measure_id": "202200495", "measure_letter": "A1", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure A1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade Napa schools to meet safety/academic standards, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing/ electrical systems, remove hazardous materials including asbestos/ lead pipes; construct, repair, upgrade, and acquire classrooms, labs, facilities/equipment to support student achievement in science, math, technology, and skilled trades, shall Napa Valley Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Napa Area)\u2019s measure authorizing $200,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 2\u00a2/$100 assessed value ($14,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight and all money staying in Napa?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18460, "no_votes": 15339, "total_votes": 33799, "percent_yes": 54.617000502973454, "percent_no": 45.382999497026546, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized $200 million in bonds for the Napa Valley ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized $200 million in bonds for the Napa Valley Unified School District to upgrade school facilities, including fixing roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, removing hazardous materials, and constructing or upgrading classrooms and labs. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of 2 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.198753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.714076", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure A1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11057, "fingerprint": "2022|202200496|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200496|NAPA", "content_hash": "bc5b54c2c13a9550", "measure_id": "202200496", "measure_letter": "A2", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure A2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide classrooms, facilities and technology to support instruction in math, science/ engineering, fix roofs, plumbing/ electrical systems, construct, repair, upgrade/ acquire classrooms, facilities, equipment, provide labs/equipment for career and technology classes to prepare students for college and in-demand jobs, shall Napa Valley Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (American Canyon Area)\u2019s measure authorizing $25,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 2\u00a2/$100 assessed value ($2,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight and all money staying in American Canyon?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3943, "no_votes": 2060, "total_votes": 6003, "percent_yes": 65.68382475428952, "percent_no": 34.31617524571048, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Napa Valley Unified School District to issue $25 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Napa Valley Unified School District to issue $25 million in bonds to construct, repair, and upgrade school facilities, classrooms, and technology equipment in the American Canyon area. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 2 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $2 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.278673", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.199380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.714243", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure A2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2469, "fingerprint": "2022|202200493|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200493|NAPA", "content_hash": "ebcdb27df24cf98a", "measure_id": "202200493", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve educational facilities; construct career technical education classrooms and facilities; upgrade classroom technology and improve technology infrastructure, shall the Calistoga Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $41,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately 3.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation (raising $2,200,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a board appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1279, "no_votes": 786, "total_votes": 2065, "percent_yes": 61.937046004842614, "percent_no": 38.062953995157386, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Calistoga Joint Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Calistoga Joint Unified School District to issue $41 million in bonds to improve educational facilities, construct career technical education classrooms, and upgrade classroom technology and infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of approximately 3.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising about $2.2 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.197310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.713581", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2473, "fingerprint": "2022|202200263|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200263|NAPA", "content_hash": "717fc393b3aebd4b", "measure_id": "202200263", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Starting November 8, 2022, shall the position of a directly elected mayor be eliminated, so that the St. Helena City Council is composed of five members who will select a member be mayor?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 750, "no_votes": 1145, "total_votes": 1895, "percent_yes": 39.577836411609496, "percent_no": 60.422163588390504, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have eliminated the directly elected mayor position in St", "summary_text": "This measure would have eliminated the directly elected mayor position in St. Helena and instead had the five-member city council select one of its members to serve as mayor.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.199961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.714413", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2474, "fingerprint": "2022|202200264|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200264|NAPA", "content_hash": "8beb46077d507dd1", "measure_id": "202200264", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect local water quality/supply, improve drought resilience by: repairing/replacing St. Helena\u2019s 1940s-era drinking water system, including pipes, aging/deteriorating drinking water, stormwater and sewage infrastructure; keeping sewage, pollution, trash, chemicals from local rivers, creeks and streams; protecting safe, sustainable, local water sources; shall City of St. Helena\u2019s measure authorizing $19,150,000 in bonds, levying approximately $14.82 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising about $1.2 million annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring citizen oversight, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1423, "no_votes": 481, "total_votes": 1904, "percent_yes": 74.7373949579832, "percent_no": 25.2626050420168, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "General Services: Water", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of St", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of St. Helena to issue $19,150,000 in bonds to repair and replace aging water, stormwater, and sewage infrastructure dating from the 1940s. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $14.82 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating about $1.2 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.200532", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.714567", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2467, "fingerprint": "2022|202200261|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200261|NAPA", "content_hash": "06e05d44f50d7394", "measure_id": "202200261", "measure_letter": "I A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure I A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of American Canyon to limit years of service by the Mayor to a combined total of three (3) four-year terms?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2797, "no_votes": 676, "total_votes": 3473, "percent_yes": 80.53556003455226, "percent_no": 19.46443996544774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance limits the Mayor of American Canyon to a combined total of thre...", "summary_text": "The ordinance limits the Mayor of American Canyon to a combined total of three four-year terms (12 years) of service.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.196433", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.713132", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure I A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11056, "fingerprint": "2022|202200262|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200262|NAPA", "content_hash": "4834933ae54fb2c7", "measure_id": "202200262", "measure_letter": "I B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure I B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of American Canyon to limit years of service by the Councilmember to a combined total of three (3) four-year terms?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2843, "no_votes": 611, "total_votes": 3454, "percent_yes": 82.31036479444123, "percent_no": 17.689635205558773, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance limits American Canyon City Council members to a combined tota...", "summary_text": "This ordinance limits American Canyon City Council members to a combined total of three four-year terms (12 years) of service.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.277529", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.196739", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.713281", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure I B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2468, "fingerprint": "2022|202200265|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200265|NAPA", "content_hash": "f7d055eb3f882192", "measure_id": "202200265", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to add 157 acres owned by Green Island Property, LLC to the City of American Canyon Urban Limit Line and amend the General Plan to expand potential city industrial development be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2810, "no_votes": 3059, "total_votes": 5869, "percent_yes": 47.87868461407395, "percent_no": 52.12131538592605, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have added 157 acres owned by Green Island Property, LLC to...", "summary_text": "The measure would have added 157 acres owned by Green Island Property, LLC to the City of American Canyon's Urban Limit Line and amended the General Plan to allow for potential industrial development on the property.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.197032", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.713431", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2471, "fingerprint": "2022|202200049|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200049|NAPA", "content_hash": "9df97589df0dbeef", "measure_id": "202200049", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To enhance local fire protection and reduce wildfire risk in Napa County by: ensuring defensible space around homes, neighborhoods, and businesses; creating fuel breaks; reducing vegetation and flammable brush; improving early wildfire detection and suppression systems; and, clearing emergency access roads for first responders and residents, shall Napa County establish a \u00bc cent sales tax for 10 years, providing approximately $10,000,000 annually, with citizen oversight, independent annual audits, and all revenue staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18637, "no_votes": 14437, "total_votes": 33074, "percent_yes": 56.3493983189212, "percent_no": 43.6506016810788, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a quarter-cent sales tax in Napa County f...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a quarter-cent sales tax in Napa County for 10 years to fund fire protection and wildfire risk reduction activities, generating approximately $10 million annually. The revenue would have been used for creating defensible space, fuel breaks, vegetation management, improving detection and suppression systems, and clearing emergency access roads.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.198167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.713914", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2470, "fingerprint": "2022|202200494|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200494|NAPA", "content_hash": "2ad7193bd93d9d7d", "measure_id": "202200494", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NAPA Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; repair or replace leaky roofs; and construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $249,600,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $17,700,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61, "no_votes": 63, "total_votes": 124, "percent_yes": 49.193548387096776, "percent_no": 50.806451612903224, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District to issue $249,600,000 in bonds to fund school facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom construction and modernization, and health and safety upgrades. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 4 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.197606", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.713745", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NAPA Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2477, "fingerprint": "2022|202200266|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200266|NEVADA", "content_hash": "2add738e049096a1", "measure_id": "202200266", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NEVADA Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Town of Truckee measure to continue protecting open space along trails; constructing the Truckee River Legacy Trail; building, repairing and maintaining trails, multi-use paths, and lanes for walking, hiking, biking and winter access; and providing safer routes to schools; by renewing the existing \u00bc% trails sales tax at a rate of \u00bd%, providing approximately $3,000,000 annually until ended by voters with independent oversight and all funds staying local to benefit Truckee, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3901, "no_votes": 1002, "total_votes": 4903, "percent_yes": 79.5635325311034, "percent_no": 20.436467468896595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Parks & Recreation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure renews and doubles an existing quarter-percent sales tax to a hal...", "summary_text": "The measure renews and doubles an existing quarter-percent sales tax to a half-percent rate to fund trail construction, maintenance, and improvement projects in Truckee, generating approximately $3 million annually. The tax will continue until voters decide to end it and includes provisions for independent oversight with all funds remaining local to Truckee.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.202354", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.715065", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEVADA Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2475, "fingerprint": "2022|202200050|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200050|NEVADA", "content_hash": "b3060321f4d06f2a", "measure_id": "202200050", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NEVADA Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain critical County of Nevada services with locally controlled funding that cannot be taken by the State, such as: wildfire prevention / emergency preparedness; reducing flammable brush countywide; improving evacuation routes to save lives; preventing illegal campfires; helping seniors / disabled residents maintain defensible space; enhancing emergency communications, early warning / 911 response; and for general government use; shall the County of Nevada measure establishing a \u00bd\u00a2 sales tax, providing $12,000,000 annually for ten years, with citizen oversight / audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24144, "no_votes": 25733, "total_votes": 49877, "percent_yes": 48.40708142029392, "percent_no": 51.59291857970608, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.201236", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.714748", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEVADA Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2476, "fingerprint": "2022|202200267|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200267|NEVADA", "content_hash": "0bfb0a5f9746cf43", "measure_id": "202200267", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "NEVADA Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance that amends the City\u2019s General Plan and Zoning Code to establish an Historic Neighborhoods District be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 570, "no_votes": 1171, "total_votes": 1741, "percent_yes": 32.73980470993682, "percent_no": 67.26019529006318, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.201806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.714911", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEVADA Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2482, "fingerprint": "2022|202200268|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200268|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4edf78bdae5d761c", "measure_id": "202200268", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City adopt a special tax measure of up to 6% of gross receipts on Cannabis retailers and up to 1 % of gross receipts on all other Cannabis businesses, which is expected to generate an estimated $300,000 to $600,000 annually for the specific purposes of funding police, homeless prevention, behavioral health services, and intervention programs, and levied until terminated by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32207, "no_votes": 17668, "total_votes": 49875, "percent_yes": 64.57543859649122, "percent_no": 35.424561403508775, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a special tax of up to 6% on cannabis retaile...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a special tax of up to 6% on cannabis retailers and up to 1% on other cannabis businesses in Orange, California, with revenues dedicated to funding police, homeless prevention, behavioral health services, and intervention programs. The tax was expected to generate $300,000 to $600,000 annually and would have continued until terminated by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.205020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.715969", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2492, "fingerprint": "2022|202200269|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200269|ORANGE", "content_hash": "16c101b89b17932c", "measure_id": "202200269", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Article IV, City Council, and Article X, Elections, of the Newport Beach City Charter be amended to provide for the direct election of the Mayor, who would be nominated by residents and registered voters of the City of Newport Beach and elected by the voters of the City at-large?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10859, "no_votes": 15385, "total_votes": 26244, "percent_yes": 41.37707666514251, "percent_no": 58.62292333485749, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the Newport Beach City Charter to allow resid...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the Newport Beach City Charter to allow residents and registered voters to directly nominate and elect the mayor city-wide, rather than the current system where the city council selects the mayor from among its members.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.209680", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.717496", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2498, "fingerprint": "2022|202200270|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200270|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1543950dabf53868", "measure_id": "202200270", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that eliminates the office of elective mayor and increases the number of councilmembers and districts from four to five?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6389, "no_votes": 9564, "total_votes": 15953, "percent_yes": 40.04889362502351, "percent_no": 59.95110637497649, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have eliminated the elected mayor position in Orange, Cali...", "summary_text": "This measure would have eliminated the elected mayor position in Orange, California and expanded the city council from four to five members representing five districts instead of four.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.212475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.718411", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2480, "fingerprint": "2022|202200497|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200497|ORANGE", "content_hash": "433195d4fe99335f", "measure_id": "202200497", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and improve Aliso Viejo\u2019s aging neighborhood schools, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewer, electrical systems; and construct/ acquire modern classrooms, facilities and technology that support college/ career readiness in science, technology, arts, math and skilled trades, shall Capistrano Unified School District\u2019s (SFID #3) measure authorizing $114,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($7,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight and all money for Aliso Viejo schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7605, "no_votes": 8697, "total_votes": 16302, "percent_yes": 46.65071770334928, "percent_no": 53.34928229665072, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Capistrano Unified School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Capistrano Unified School District to issue $114 million in bonds to repair and improve school facilities in Aliso Viejo, including fixing roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and constructing modern classrooms and technology infrastructure. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of approximately 4 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.204000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.715642", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2497, "fingerprint": "2022|202200498|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200498|ORANGE", "content_hash": "043dcded1adf0429", "measure_id": "202200498", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Members of the Santa Ana Unified School District Governing Board be limited to three (3) terms of office?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28498, "no_votes": 4154, "total_votes": 32652, "percent_yes": 87.27796153374985, "percent_no": 12.722038466250154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a three-term limit for members of the Santa Ana Unif...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a three-term limit for members of the Santa Ana Unified School District Governing Board. The measure passed with 59% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.212048", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.718261", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2478, "fingerprint": "2022|202200271|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200271|ORANGE", "content_hash": "7e83e801f7a76d7e", "measure_id": "202200271", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of Aliso Viejo to limit consecutive years of service by members of the City Council to a combined total of two four-year terms with the ability to again serve as a member after a lapse of service of at least two years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14597, "no_votes": 2604, "total_votes": 17201, "percent_yes": 84.8613452706238, "percent_no": 15.1386547293762, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance limits Aliso Viejo City Council members to serving a maximum o...", "summary_text": "This ordinance limits Aliso Viejo City Council members to serving a maximum of two consecutive four-year terms, after which they must wait at least two years before being eligible to serve again.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.202884", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.715226", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2479, "fingerprint": "2022|202200272|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200272|ORANGE", "content_hash": "18d3c344901218cb", "measure_id": "202200272", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City\u2019s existing Transient Occupancy Tax, which is a tax on persons occupying hotel/motel rooms, be updated to require online and other travel companies to collect and remit taxes on the full rate charged to guests for accommodations, generating up to $3 million annually to be used for general City services, such as police, fire and emergency response, street maintenance, youth/senior services and parks, until ended by the voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41143, "no_votes": 28317, "total_votes": 69460, "percent_yes": 59.23265188597754, "percent_no": 40.76734811402246, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure updates Orange's existing hotel/motel tax to require online trave...", "summary_text": "The measure updates Orange's existing hotel/motel tax to require online travel companies to collect and remit taxes on the full rate charged to guests rather than just their wholesale rate. The change is estimated to generate up to $3 million annually for general city services including police, fire, street maintenance, and parks.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.203449", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.715470", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2481, "fingerprint": "2022|202200273|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200273|ORANGE", "content_hash": "de5df5256849fb84", "measure_id": "202200273", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide for future housing needs of workers, middle-class families, and seniors; maintain the character of Costa Mesa\u2019s single-family neighborhoods; protect the environment and open space; attract new businesses; and maintain local control; shall voters authorize the City Council to adopt publicly-reviewed land use plans to revitalize outdated commercial/industrial corridors such as Newport and Harbor Boulevards, and expand affordable housing, while restricting building heights, requiring developer-paid fees, and keeping residential neighborhoods intact?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16483, "no_votes": 16461, "total_votes": 32944, "percent_yes": 50.033389995143274, "percent_no": 49.966610004856726, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Costa Mesa City Council to adopt publicly-reviewe...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Costa Mesa City Council to adopt publicly-reviewed land use plans for revitalizing commercial and industrial corridors while expanding affordable housing, with restrictions on building heights and requirements for developer-paid fees. The measure aimed to balance development with preserving existing single-family residential neighborhoods.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.204553", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.715802", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2483, "fingerprint": "2022|202200274|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200274|ORANGE", "content_hash": "81e3d4b366474dbb", "measure_id": "202200274", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall proposed Charter Amendment Measure 1 to: amend outdated phrases, syntax, dates, pronouns, titles, and procedures to clarify City processes; exempt from Section 612 replacement of existing equipment and infrastructure if it maintains its current use and does not exceed its footprint or height by more than 10% and construction of restrooms, in parks and beaches; and require the City to consider Charter reviews at least once every decade following the last review, be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31246, "no_votes": 43508, "total_votes": 74754, "percent_yes": 41.79843219091955, "percent_no": 58.20156780908045, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment would have updated outdated language and procedures in...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment would have updated outdated language and procedures in Orange's city charter, exempted certain equipment replacements and restroom construction from Section 612 requirements if they meet specified size limits, and required the city to review the charter at least once per decade.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.205499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.716120", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2484, "fingerprint": "2022|202200275|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200275|ORANGE", "content_hash": "465acfdccff90c5a", "measure_id": "202200275", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall proposed Charter Amendment Measure 2 to: require City Clerks and City Treasurers to meet minimum qualifications at the time of filing candidacy; require at least four votes to fill Council vacancies and limit appointees to serve only until the next municipal election; no longer require City Attorneys to be graduates from law schools only accredited by the American Bar Association; and update City Treasurer responsibilities accordingly, be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29378, "no_votes": 45777, "total_votes": 75155, "percent_yes": 39.08988091278026, "percent_no": 60.91011908721974, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.205996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.716272", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2485, "fingerprint": "2022|202200276|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200276|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6838e9bdad6b154c", "measure_id": "202200276", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall proposed Charter Amendment Measure 3 to: define the Attorney-Client relationship between City Attorney and City, designating City Council as Client; determine all legal matters to be controlled by City Council and managed by City Attorney under City Council direction; permit City Council to contract with other attorneys if the City Attorney has a conflict of interest; require City Attorney to keep all legal records and comply with requests for information, be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32390, "no_votes": 41385, "total_votes": 73775, "percent_yes": 43.903761436801084, "percent_no": 56.096238563198916, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended Orange's city charter to formally establish t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended Orange's city charter to formally establish the City Council as the client in the attorney-client relationship with the City Attorney, giving the Council control over all legal matters and allowing them to hire outside attorneys when conflicts of interest arise. It also would have required the City Attorney to maintain legal records and comply with information requests from the Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.206430", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.716425", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2486, "fingerprint": "2022|202200277|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200277|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e1b12c2eb87b1c17", "measure_id": "202200277", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City adopt an Ordinance that taxes cannabis businesses up to 6% of gross receipts for retailers and up to 1% of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses if they were to be permitted in the City; which is expected to generate an estimated $300,000 to $600,000 annually to fund general municipal services for Huntington Beach and will be levied until repealed by the voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42771, "no_votes": 35463, "total_votes": 78234, "percent_yes": 54.67060357389371, "percent_no": 45.32939642610629, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopts an ordinance imposing taxes on cannabis businesses at up ...", "summary_text": "This measure adopts an ordinance imposing taxes on cannabis businesses at up to 6% of gross receipts for retailers and up to 1% for other cannabis businesses, if such businesses were to be permitted in the city. The tax is expected to generate $300,000 to $600,000 annually for general municipal services and would remain in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.206904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.716576", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2487, "fingerprint": "2022|202200278|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200278|ORANGE", "content_hash": "887e65cd640592d6", "measure_id": "202200278", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support City of La Palma services such as providing updated equipment for local police officers, maintaining streets and sidewalks, supporting programs and services for youth, seniors, and families, and for general government use, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City of La Palma\u2019s transient occupancy tax paid by hotel/short-term rental guests from 8% to 12%, generating approximately $200,000 annually until ended by voters, subject to annual audits and all funds staying in La Palma?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3647, "no_votes": 1496, "total_votes": 5143, "percent_yes": 70.91191911335795, "percent_no": 29.088080886642047, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would increase La Palma's transient occupancy tax on hotel and sh...", "summary_text": "The measure would increase La Palma's transient occupancy tax on hotel and short-term rental guests from 8% to 12%, generating approximately $200,000 annually for city services including police equipment, street maintenance, and youth/senior programs. The tax increase would remain in effect until ended by voters and be subject to annual audits with all funds staying within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.207406", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.716724", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2488, "fingerprint": "2022|202200279|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200279|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0028a24381511af0", "measure_id": "202200279", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the proposed ordinance to amend the Laguna Beach Municipal Code to: (1) create an Overlay Zoning District covering all property in the City located within 750 feet of the centerline of either Coast Highway or Laguna Canyon Road/Broadway; (2) establish special requirements for any Major Development Project; and (3) require voter approval for any Major Development Project that does not conform to the special requirements and projects causing cumulative effects, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4439, "no_votes": 7965, "total_votes": 12404, "percent_yes": 35.786842953885845, "percent_no": 64.21315704611416, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have created a special overlay zoning district within 750 f...", "summary_text": "The measure would have created a special overlay zoning district within 750 feet of Coast Highway or Laguna Canyon Road/Broadway and required voter approval for major development projects that don't meet special requirements or cause cumulative effects. It would have established additional regulations for major development projects within this overlay district.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.207832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.716889", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2489, "fingerprint": "2022|202200280|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200280|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e535b00080d52f34", "measure_id": "202200280", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the proposed ordinance to amend the Laguna Beach Municipal Code to: (1) create a Laguna Hotel Overlay Zoning District covering all property in the City located within 1,000 feet of the centerline of either Coast Highway or Laguna Canyon Road/Broadway; (2) establish special requirements for any Hotel Development Project; and (3) require voter approval for any Hotel Development Project that does not conform to the special requirements, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3677, "no_votes": 8559, "total_votes": 12236, "percent_yes": 30.050670153644983, "percent_no": 69.94932984635501, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have created a special hotel overlay zoning district withi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have created a special hotel overlay zoning district within 1,000 feet of Coast Highway or Laguna Canyon Road/Broadway in Laguna Beach, establishing special requirements for hotel development projects and requiring voter approval for any hotel projects that don't meet those requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.208313", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.717042", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2490, "fingerprint": "2022|202200281|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200281|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d1b8359faec25e08", "measure_id": "202200281", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the proposed ordinance to amend the Laguna Beach Municipal Code to: (1) create a minimum hourly wage for hotel employees of $18, increasing annually; (2) establish workplace standards and protections for hotel employees; (3) authorize the City to adopt administrative regulations to implement the provisions of the ordinance; and (4) authorize the City and others to enforce the provisions of the ordinance, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3972, "no_votes": 8358, "total_votes": 12330, "percent_yes": 32.21411192214112, "percent_no": 67.78588807785889, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The proposed ordinance would have established an $18 minimum hourly wage for ...", "summary_text": "The proposed ordinance would have established an $18 minimum hourly wage for hotel employees in Laguna Beach with annual increases, along with additional workplace standards and protections. It would have also authorized the city to create administrative regulations and enforcement mechanisms for these provisions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.208791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.717194", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2491, "fingerprint": "2022|202200282|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200282|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c4032f8ad6524f76", "measure_id": "202200282", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund City services, shall a measure establishing a tax on cannabis businesses of the higher of the following rates: 4%- 10% of gross receipts or $5-$35 per square foot for retail businesses; and 1%-10% of gross receipts or $1-$35 per square foot for other businesses, with certain rates increasing annually, generating an estimated $750,000 annually if cannabis businesses were to be authorized in the future, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6555, "no_votes": 4185, "total_votes": 10740, "percent_yes": 61.03351955307262, "percent_no": 38.96648044692738, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a tax on cannabis businesses in Orange, California, ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a tax on cannabis businesses in Orange, California, with rates ranging from 4-10% of gross receipts or $5-35 per square foot for retail operations, and 1-10% of gross receipts or $1-35 per square foot for other cannabis businesses. The tax would generate an estimated $750,000 annually if cannabis businesses are authorized in the city in the future.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.209193", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.717343", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2493, "fingerprint": "2022|202200283|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200283|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fdb6a8467faaa4d4", "measure_id": "202200283", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13746, "no_votes": 12064, "total_votes": 25810, "percent_yes": 53.25842696629214, "percent_no": 46.74157303370786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would change the City Clerk position in Orange, California from ...", "summary_text": "This measure would change the City Clerk position in Orange, California from an elected office to one appointed by the city government. The measure passed, making the City Clerk an appointive rather than elected position.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.210176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.717646", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2494, "fingerprint": "2022|202200284|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200284|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4beca00fc560a2f7", "measure_id": "202200284", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13201, "no_votes": 12704, "total_votes": 25905, "percent_yes": 50.95927427137619, "percent_no": 49.04072572862381, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure made the City Treasurer position in Orange, California an appoin...", "summary_text": "This measure made the City Treasurer position in Orange, California an appointed office rather than an elected one. The change transfers the authority to select the City Treasurer from voters to the city's appointing authority.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.210608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.717793", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2495, "fingerprint": "2022|202200285|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200285|ORANGE", "content_hash": "027bed31293da950", "measure_id": "202200285", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Chapter 21 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code be amended to restructure non-cannabis business license tax rates within the City of Santa Ana to improve tax equity among all business sizes, reflect current best practices, recognize the impact of home-based businesses and the new \u201cgig\u201d economy, and to provide a flexible tax holiday period for unlicensed, past due, or under-assessed businesses, with the intent to have a revenue-neutral fiscal impact to the City?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27142, "no_votes": 14596, "total_votes": 41738, "percent_yes": 65.0294695481336, "percent_no": 34.970530451866395, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure restructured non-cannabis business license tax rates in Santa An...", "summary_text": "This measure restructured non-cannabis business license tax rates in Santa Ana to improve equity among different business sizes, account for home-based and gig economy businesses, and provide tax holiday periods for certain non-compliant businesses. The changes were designed to be revenue-neutral for the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.211055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.717940", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2496, "fingerprint": "2022|202200286|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200286|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3da773f209f93474", "measure_id": "202200286", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Santa Ana City Charter be amended to update the Charter by imposing a lifetime ban for the Mayor after 4 terms and a lifetime ban for Councilmembers after completion of 3 terms, requiring approval of 2/3 of the City Council to adopt a budget, expanding the application of the Code of Ethics, utilizing gender neutral language throughout the Charter, changing references to the \u201cClerk of Council\u201d to \u201cCity Clerk\u201d and making other minor updates?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32071, "no_votes": 10425, "total_votes": 42496, "percent_yes": 75.46827936746988, "percent_no": 24.531720632530124, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment imposed lifetime term limits of 4 terms for the Mayor ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment imposed lifetime term limits of 4 terms for the Mayor and 3 terms for City Council members, required a two-thirds council majority to adopt budgets, expanded ethics code application, and made various language updates including gender-neutral terms and changing \"Clerk of Council\" to \"City Clerk.\"", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.211551", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.718101", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2499, "fingerprint": "2022|202200287|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200287|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ebb927d87dcc1d57", "measure_id": "202200287", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect Westminster\u2019s local finances without increasing tax rates, prevent cuts to 911 emergency response, police, gang/drug prevention, firefighters, paramedics, emergency response equipment, disaster preparedness, addressing homelessness, protecting drinking water, maintaining local jobs, and for general government use, shall an ordinance continuing the existing voter-approved 1% sales tax, until March 31, 2043, providing estimated $16,800,000 annually, requiring audits, public spending disclosure, funds controlled locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16773, "no_votes": 7144, "total_votes": 23917, "percent_yes": 70.13003303089852, "percent_no": 29.869966969101483, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure continues Westminster's existing 1% sales tax until March...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure continues Westminster's existing 1% sales tax until March 31, 2043, generating an estimated $16.8 million annually for general government services including public safety, emergency response, and other city operations. The measure requires audits and public spending disclosure with funds remaining under local control.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.212927", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.718622", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2500, "fingerprint": "2022|202200288|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200288|ORANGE", "content_hash": "cab6c7d71745695e", "measure_id": "202200288", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall ordinances be adopted amending General Plan/Zoning requirements allowing housing units, some with increased heights, to meet state-mandated laws at: Rose/Blake, Yorba Linda/Mountain View, Lemon/Plumosa, Old Canal/Eastpark, mideast Oakcrest, Imperial/Bastanchury, Richfield (south of Calgary), Yorba Linda/Liverpool, Highland/Mountain View, Yorba Linda/Ohio (2 sites), Eureka/Oak Leaf, Eureka/Bastanchury, Prospect/Imperial, northeast Altrudy, Eureka/Mark, Eureka/Buena Vida, Imperial (west of Casa Loma), and Bastanchury/Plumosa?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7221, "no_votes": 21937, "total_votes": 29158, "percent_yes": 24.7650730502778, "percent_no": 75.2349269497222, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would have amended Orange's General Plan and zoning requiremen...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would have amended Orange's General Plan and zoning requirements to allow housing units, including some with increased building heights, at 18 specified locations throughout the city to comply with state-mandated housing laws.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.213432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.718810", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2504, "fingerprint": "2022|202200289|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200289|PLACER", "content_hash": "11cbd9370f4f2d2a", "measure_id": "202200289", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain North Lake Tahoe\u2019s local critical quality of life services such as addressing workforce housing needs; reducing traffic congestion and trash/litter in public places/streets; maintaining public beaches/parks/trails/shoreline recreation areas; and other general services, shall a measure continuing \u2013 without increasing \u2013 the existing 2% North Lake Tahoe hotel tax paid only by hotel/short-term rental guests, generating approximately $4,000,000 annually until ended by voters with oversight, and all funds exclusively for North Lake Tahoe, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3301, "no_votes": 368, "total_votes": 3669, "percent_yes": 89.97001907876806, "percent_no": 10.029980921231939, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continued an existing 2% transient occupancy tax on hotels and s...", "summary_text": "This measure continued an existing 2% transient occupancy tax on hotels and short-term rentals in North Lake Tahoe without increasing the rate, generating approximately $4 million annually for local services including workforce housing, traffic management, litter reduction, and maintenance of public recreational areas. The tax is paid by guests staying in hotels and short-term rentals, with all funds designated exclusively for North Lake Tahoe services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.215192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.719420", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2502, "fingerprint": "2022|202200290|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200290|PLACER", "content_hash": "1dda26c7076e2d49", "measure_id": "202200290", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support essential City services, including police, fire, road and pothole repair, and parks and recreation, shall the measure increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax (paid only by hotel/motel/shortterm rental guests) rate from 8% to 10% and expanding the obligation to collect Transient Occupancy Tax to all persons receiving compensation from such rentals, generating an estimated $29,000 annually until ended by the voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 473, "no_votes": 204, "total_votes": 677, "percent_yes": 69.86706056129985, "percent_no": 30.13293943870015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Placer's transient occupancy tax rate from 8% to 10% a...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Placer's transient occupancy tax rate from 8% to 10% and expanded the tax collection obligation to all persons receiving compensation from hotel, motel, and short-term rental accommodations. The measure was estimated to generate approximately $29,000 annually for city services until terminated by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.214386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.719116", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2506, "fingerprint": "2022|202200292|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200292|PLACER", "content_hash": "4274153f3258855c", "measure_id": "202200292", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue local funding that cannot be taken by the State for City of Roseville essential services such as: 911 emergency response; repairing potholes and streets; neighborhood police patrols; fire protection; addressing blight; and maintaining existing city amenities; shall the measure increasing Roseville's existing transient occupancy tax (paid only by hotel and lodging guests) from 6% set in 1975 to 10% providing an estimated additional $3 million annually, with independent audits, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41546, "no_votes": 15891, "total_votes": 57437, "percent_yes": 72.33316503299267, "percent_no": 27.666834967007333, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Roseville's transient occupancy tax (paid by hotel and...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Roseville's transient occupancy tax (paid by hotel and lodging guests) from 6% to 10%, generating an estimated additional $3 million annually for city services including emergency response, street repairs, police patrols, fire protection, and city amenities. The tax increase would remain in effect until ended by voters and includes provisions for independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.215790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.719738", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2501, "fingerprint": "2022|202200499|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200499|PLACER", "content_hash": "eb1cefe98b9af801", "measure_id": "202200499", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To retain/attract quality teachers, provide students with a well-rounded education in science, technology and engineering/math by upgrading deteriorating classrooms/schools, removing asbestos/lead paint, repairing roofs and gas lines/electric wiring and maintaining safe school drinking water, shall the Auburn Union School District issue $45,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, annually levying approximately $28 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $2,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits/public spending disclosure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6962, "no_votes": 8549, "total_votes": 15511, "percent_yes": 44.88427567532719, "percent_no": 55.11572432467281, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Auburn Union School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Auburn Union School District to issue $45 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom upgrades, asbestos and lead paint removal, and infrastructure repairs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $28 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.213998", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.718965", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2505, "fingerprint": "2022|202200291|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200291|PLACER", "content_hash": "1aaa4033930ace0d", "measure_id": "202200291", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain local funding for essential services including: Police and Fire/Emergency Medical Service response, street/road repair, and park maintenance in the City of Rocklin, shall a measure expanding the definition of hotel to include campgrounds, and increasing the existing Transient Occupancy Tax (paid by hotel/lodging guests) from 8% to 10%, providing an estimated $300,000 annually, with independent audits, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16713, "no_votes": 11808, "total_votes": 28521, "percent_yes": 58.59892710634269, "percent_no": 41.40107289365731, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure expanded Rocklin's transient occupancy tax to include campground...", "summary_text": "This measure expanded Rocklin's transient occupancy tax to include campgrounds and increased the tax rate from 8% to 10%, generating an estimated $300,000 annually for police, fire, street repair, and park maintenance services. The tax is paid by hotel and lodging guests and includes provisions for independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.215473", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.719590", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2508, "fingerprint": "2022|202200502|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200502|PLACER", "content_hash": "f7305f24509fb42a", "measure_id": "202200502", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renovate/ modernize Carlin Coppin and Creekside Oaks Elementary Schools, Lincoln and Phoenix High Schools; complete Twelve Bridges High School; remove/ replace asbestos, lead pipes, roofs, electrical systems; supporting achievement in math, science, engineering, reading, arts and technology; improve safety/ security/ disabled access; prevent overcrowding; shall Western Placer Unified School District issue $185,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, annually levying approximately $54 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $9,400,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits / citizens oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11487, "no_votes": 15109, "total_votes": 26596, "percent_yes": 43.19070536922845, "percent_no": 56.80929463077155, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Western Placer Unified School District...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Western Placer Unified School District to issue $185 million in bonds to renovate and modernize several elementary and high schools, including removing hazardous materials, upgrading infrastructure, and completing construction of Twelve Bridges High School. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of approximately $54 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.216404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.720056", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2507, "fingerprint": "2022|202200501|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200501|PLACER", "content_hash": "3036a96ec906170b", "measure_id": "202200501", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure of Twin Rivers Unified School District be adopted to repair heating/ air conditioning/ electrical systems; provide safe drinking water/ playgrounds; remove asbestos/ mold/ lead paint; repair leaky roofs; improve security systems; construct classrooms; by authorizing $120 million in bonds at legal interest rates, levies of 2.3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, raising approximately $8 million annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring oversight, annual audits, all funds benefiting local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59, "no_votes": 125, "total_votes": 184, "percent_yes": 32.065217391304344, "percent_no": 67.93478260869566, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Twin Rivers Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $120 million in bonds to fund facility repairs and improvements including HVAC systems, roofs, safety upgrades, classroom construction, and hazardous material removal. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of 2.3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $8 million annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.216123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.719893", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2503, "fingerprint": "2022|202200500|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200500|PLACER", "content_hash": "c0ed935ceecc1172", "measure_id": "202200500", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLACER Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of educational facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Elverta Joint Elementary School District's measure be adopted authorizing $4,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $239,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71, "no_votes": 104, "total_votes": 175, "percent_yes": 40.57142857142857, "percent_no": 59.42857142857143, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Elverta Joint Elementary School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Elverta Joint Elementary School District to issue $4 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including electrical system upgrades, roof replacements, classroom and restroom modernization, and health and safety accessibility improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.214749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.719268", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLACER Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2511, "fingerprint": "2022|202200301|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200301|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1aa0c539f10a66c2", "measure_id": "202200301", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure 3", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Mary Hamlin be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council, District 3?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2576, "no_votes": 122, "total_votes": 2698, "percent_yes": 95.4781319495923, "percent_no": 4.521868050407704, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Mary Hamlin from her pos...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Mary Hamlin from her position as City Council Member for District 3 in Riverside, California. The recall passed with 1.0% of voters supporting her removal from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-12-13", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.217361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.720529", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure 3", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2515, "fingerprint": "2022|202200297|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200297|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "fd37d849dd4c9d8b", "measure_id": "202200297", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, proposing to phase-out and permanently ban \"non-hosted short-term vacation rentals,\" as defined, in non-exempt areas of the City of La Quinta by December 31, 2024, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7400, "no_votes": 7708, "total_votes": 15108, "percent_yes": 48.98067249139529, "percent_no": 51.01932750860471, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.218669", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.721142", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2516, "fingerprint": "2022|202200298|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200298|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "123036ee2c11af99", "measure_id": "202200298", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) In Palm Desert now, District 1 (the area surrounding Civic Center with 20% of the population) selects one Council representative every four years, and District 2 (the other 80% of the City) votes for a total of four Council representatives, picking two representatives every two years. Should District 2 be divided into four smaller districts, with all voters electing a single person from their smaller district every four years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9829, "no_votes": 8633, "total_votes": 18462, "percent_yes": 53.23908568952442, "percent_no": 46.76091431047558, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked voters whether Palm Desert's District 2, which co...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked voters whether Palm Desert's District 2, which covers 80% of the city and elects four council representatives, should be divided into four smaller districts with each electing one representative every four years. The measure would change the current system where District 2 voters choose two representatives every two years to a system where each of the four new districts would elect one representative every four years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.218990", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.721288", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2517, "fingerprint": "2022|202200299|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200299|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "714815c961135226", "measure_id": "202200299", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Charter be amended to provide that the council shall at its second regular meeting in November in non-election years and at the meeting when members are installed during election years, appoint members to serve as mayor and mayor pro tem for one year that affords each member with an equal opportunity to serve as mayor and mayor pro tem under such guidelines established by ordinance?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5342, "no_votes": 3041, "total_votes": 8383, "percent_yes": 63.724203745675766, "percent_no": 36.275796254324234, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Riverside's charter to require the city council to appoin...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Riverside's charter to require the city council to appoint a mayor and mayor pro tem for one-year terms at specified November meetings, with guidelines ensuring each council member has equal opportunity to serve in these roles.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.219261", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.721435", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2518, "fingerprint": "2022|202200300|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200300|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a0e055d748d2c91f", "measure_id": "202200300", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Charter be amended to provide that the council shall at its first regular meeting in December, or as soon thereafter in the event of delayed certification of election results, appoint members to serve as mayor and mayor pro tem for a one-year period that affords each member of the council with an equal opportunity to serve as mayor and mayor pro tem under such guidelines established by ordinance?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4969, "no_votes": 3287, "total_votes": 8256, "percent_yes": 60.186531007751945, "percent_no": 39.813468992248055, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.219616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.721590", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2513, "fingerprint": "2022|202200295|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200295|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "798f2476166a45e1", "measure_id": "202200295", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Corona adopt an ordinance enacting a tax on commercial cannabis businesses of up to 9% of gross receipts for retail sales, up to 7% of gross receipts for manufacturing and distribution, and up to 3% for testing laboratories, generating approximately $5,000,000 annually for general City services, such as police and emergency response, parks and youth/senior services, and street repair, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23916, "no_votes": 14982, "total_votes": 38898, "percent_yes": 61.48388091932747, "percent_no": 38.51611908067253, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacted a tax on commercial cannabis businesses in Corona with ra...", "summary_text": "The measure enacted a tax on commercial cannabis businesses in Corona with rates up to 9% of gross receipts for retail, 7% for manufacturing and distribution, and 3% for testing laboratories. The tax is expected to generate approximately $5 million annually for general city services including police, emergency response, parks, youth and senior services, and street repair.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.218006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.720841", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2514, "fingerprint": "2022|202200296|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200296|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4cb9b6a351997a77", "measure_id": "202200296", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue providing general governmental revenues which are used for public safety services, including but not limited to, police, fire, and emergency medical services, and other essential government services, shall Ordinance No 2001 be adopted continuing without increase the existing, voter-approved one percent Hemet Transactions and Use Tax which provides approximately $15,000,000 annually, until ended by the voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11353, "no_votes": 8224, "total_votes": 19577, "percent_yes": 57.99152066200133, "percent_no": 42.00847933799867, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues an existing 1% sales tax in Hemet that generates appro...", "summary_text": "This measure continues an existing 1% sales tax in Hemet that generates approximately $15 million annually for general government services including public safety, police, fire, and emergency medical services. The tax remains in effect until voters choose to end it in a future election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.218281", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.720990", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2510, "fingerprint": "2022|202200293|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200293|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1e4047cc3d0b4dcf", "measure_id": "202200293", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide improved park maintenance, park improvements and for other general municipal purposes in Banning, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a utility users tax at the rate of $0.015 (one and one-half cent) for each kilowatt-hour of electricity used by an electric energy service user in Banning, which is estimated to generate approximately $2 million in annual revenue, until repealed by the voters, subject to independent financial audits and citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2450, "no_votes": 5650, "total_votes": 8100, "percent_yes": 30.246913580246915, "percent_no": 69.75308641975309, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized a utility users tax of $0", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized a utility users tax of $0.015 per kilowatt-hour of electricity used in Banning, estimated to generate approximately $2 million annually for park maintenance, park improvements, and other general municipal purposes. The tax would have continued until repealed by voters and been subject to independent audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.217087", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.720376", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2509, "fingerprint": "2022|202200503|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200503|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2c96eead77658959", "measure_id": "202200503", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve school safety systems, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, remove asbestos/lead pipes, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, science labs, school facilities/ equipment and support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, arts and skilled trades, shall Alvord Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $248,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 6 cents per $100 assessed value ($14,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, and all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10567, "no_votes": 8149, "total_votes": 18716, "percent_yes": 56.45971361402009, "percent_no": 43.54028638597991, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Alvord Unified School District to issue $248 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Alvord Unified School District to issue $248 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including safety systems, infrastructure repairs, classroom construction, and equipment upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.216734", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.720207", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2512, "fingerprint": "2022|202200294|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200294|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2dcefbfd162fe33b", "measure_id": "202200294", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide safe/clean Cathedral City parks and recreation facilities including repairing bathrooms, maintaining safe drinking water, increasing water conservation, improving disabled accessibility; keep afterschool/ senior programs affordable; enhance youth drug/ gang prevention; shall Cathedral City's measure be adopted levying 15\u00a2\u00a0per building square foot annually on single-family residential units, other rates for land uses ($4,500,000 annually) until ended by voters, authorizing bonds/ appropriation limit of $39,000,000, requiring public spending disclosure, all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6980, "no_votes": 5808, "total_votes": 12788, "percent_yes": 54.582421019705976, "percent_no": 45.417578980294024, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Parks & Recreation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an annual property tax of 15 cents per square...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an annual property tax of 15 cents per square foot on single-family residential units (with different rates for other land uses) to fund Cathedral City parks and recreation facility improvements, youth and senior programs, and related services. The measure also would have authorized up to $39 million in bonds and generated approximately $4.5 million annually until terminated by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.217679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.720680", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2524, "fingerprint": "2022|202200053|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200053|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "838d8f76b1bb2eef", "measure_id": "202200053", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) To fix potholes and repair damaged streets; provide safe routes to school; expand affordable senior and disabled transit services; eliminate bottlenecks and improve emergency response times; reduce traffic congestion; and improve air quality; Shall the measure approving the Sacramento County Transportation, Maintenance, Safety and Congestion Relief Act of 2022 - Retail Transactions and Use Tax Initiative, including a 40-year 0.5% sales tax raising an estimated $212,512,500 annually for transportation and transit projects, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 203559, "no_votes": 255160, "total_votes": 458719, "percent_yes": 44.37553273354712, "percent_no": 55.62446726645288, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have implemented a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have implemented a 0.5% sales tax in Sacramento County for 40 years to fund transportation infrastructure improvements, including road repairs, public transit expansion, and traffic congestion reduction projects. The tax was estimated to generate approximately $212.5 million annually for these transportation and transit initiatives.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.221490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.722535", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2525, "fingerprint": "2022|202200054|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200054|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "bef628c0c5e48b19", "measure_id": "202200054", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to fund enhanced County homeless services, including those benefitting the American River Parkway, by establishing a special tax on the gross receipts from cannabis and hemp businesses in unincorporated Sacramento County, not exceeding 6% for retail, 4% for manufacturing, 3% for distribution, 2% for testing and, 3% for cultivation or $10 per canopy square foot inflation adjustable, generating an estimated $5,100,000 to $7,700,000 annually, and levied until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 244037, "no_votes": 211677, "total_votes": 455714, "percent_yes": 53.55047244543727, "percent_no": 46.44952755456273, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a special tax on cannabis and hemp busine...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a special tax on cannabis and hemp businesses in unincorporated Sacramento County, with rates ranging from 2-6% of gross receipts or $10 per square foot for cultivation, to fund enhanced county homeless services including those benefiting the American River Parkway. The tax was estimated to generate $5.1-7.7 million annually and would have remained in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.221864", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.722688", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2523, "fingerprint": "2022|202200051|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200051|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "acc06bab41ae37bb", "measure_id": "202200051", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Sacramento County Vehicle Abatement Program and associated vehicle registration and renewal fees ($1.00 dollar per vehicle and an additional $2.00 dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be extended for a ten-year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for the purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 177566, "no_votes": 130271, "total_votes": 307837, "percent_yes": 57.68182512173651, "percent_no": 42.31817487826349, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.221182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.722381", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2526, "fingerprint": "2022|202200055|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200055|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "383104e374fb9d36", "measure_id": "202200055", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the unincorporated County of Sacramento and incorporated cities within, including Sacramento, Elk Grove, Citrus Heights, Folsom, Galt, Rancho Cordova, and Isleton, be authorized to annually develop, acquire, or construct housing for low-income persons and families, including elderly or disabled persons, equivalent with 1% of the existing housing units in the county? Any unconstructed housing units in each year will be carried over annually.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 275943, "no_votes": 177165, "total_votes": 453108, "percent_yes": 60.90005031912922, "percent_no": 39.09994968087078, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Sacramento County and its incorporated cities to annu...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Sacramento County and its incorporated cities to annually develop, acquire, or construct affordable housing for low-income persons and families equal to 1% of existing housing units in the county. Any housing units not constructed in a given year would carry over to the following year.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.222139", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.722839", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2519, "fingerprint": "2022|202200302|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200302|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "5b5448385e66fb43", "measure_id": "202200302", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support essential services such as crime reduction; rapid 9-1-1, fire, police, medical emergency/disaster response; keeping public areas safe/clean; addressing homelessness; pothole repair/street/park maintenance; youth crime/gang prevention programs; and other general community purposes; shall the measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $21,300,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, citizen oversight, public spending disclosures, and all funds locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30434, "no_votes": 25611, "total_votes": 56045, "percent_yes": 54.30279239896512, "percent_no": 45.69720760103488, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Sacramento to fund various cit...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Sacramento to fund various city services including emergency response, street maintenance, crime prevention, and homelessness programs, generating approximately $21.3 million annually. The measure includes requirements for audits, citizen oversight, and public spending disclosures, with funds remaining under local control until voters choose to end the tax.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.219940", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.721739", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2531, "fingerprint": "2022|202200505|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200505|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "6eb8dcd0816f6bf0", "measure_id": "202200505", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure of Twin Rivers Unified School District be adopted to repair heating/ air conditioning/ electrical systems; provide safe drinking water/ playgrounds; remove asbestos/ mold/ lead paint; repair leaky roofs; improve security systems; construct classrooms; by authorizing $120 million in bonds at legal interest rates, levies of 2.3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, raising approximately $8 million annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring oversight, annual audits, all funds benefiting local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23284, "no_votes": 14205, "total_votes": 37489, "percent_yes": 62.10888527301341, "percent_no": 37.89111472698659, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $120...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $120 million in bonds to fund facility repairs and improvements including HVAC systems, roofs, safety upgrades, and classroom construction. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 2.3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.223750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.723632", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2532, "fingerprint": "2022|202200506|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200506|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "e2c1efc040b59a97", "measure_id": "202200506", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure of Twin Rivers Unified School District\u2019s SFID be adopted to upgrade heating/ air conditioning/electrical systems; provide safe drinking water/ playgrounds; repair blacktop /leaky roofs, outdated classrooms/ bathrooms/kitchens; remove mold/asbestos/lead paint; by authorizing $150 million in bonds at legal interest rates, levies of 3.7\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, raising approximately $10 million annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring oversight, annual audits, all funds benefiting local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18637, "no_votes": 14112, "total_votes": 32749, "percent_yes": 56.90860789642432, "percent_no": 43.09139210357568, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $150...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $150 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including HVAC and electrical upgrades, roof and playground repairs, kitchen and bathroom renovations, and removal of hazardous materials like asbestos and lead paint. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of 3.7 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $10 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.224042", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.723790", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2527, "fingerprint": "2022|202200304|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200304|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "e8e8c6c297e24776", "measure_id": "202200304", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the City of Sacramento Charter to allocate an amount of its General Fund revenue equivalent to 40 percent of the total revenue generated from the existing cannabis business operations tax towards a Children\u2019s Fund for positive youth development and youth violence prevention programs such as mental health counseling, substance abuse treatment, early prevention and intervention, after-school activities, and services for homeless youth and foster children, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 85903, "no_votes": 50955, "total_votes": 136858, "percent_yes": 62.767978488652474, "percent_no": 37.232021511347526, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Sacramento's city charter to allocate 40% of cannabis bus...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Sacramento's city charter to allocate 40% of cannabis business tax revenue to a Children's Fund that supports youth development and violence prevention programs including mental health services, substance abuse treatment, after-school activities, and services for homeless and foster youth. The measure passed in 2022.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.222464", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.722989", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2528, "fingerprint": "2022|202200305|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200305|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "5c3c1518b5bf47b1", "measure_id": "202200305", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending section 171 to the City of Sacramento Charter \u2013 to state that at the first election after adoption of a new redistricting map, councilmembers shall be elected for each district under the map that has the same district number as a district whose incumbent\u2019s term is due to expire \u2013 be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84583, "no_votes": 41298, "total_votes": 125881, "percent_yes": 67.19282496961416, "percent_no": 32.807175030385835, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Sacramento's city charter to specify that when new redis...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Sacramento's city charter to specify that when new redistricting maps are adopted, councilmembers in the first election under the new map would be elected for districts with the same numbers as districts where incumbent terms are expiring.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.222788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.723150", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2529, "fingerprint": "2022|202200306|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200306|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "cdf3c2e2783053ba", "measure_id": "202200306", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, with no increase in tax rates, amending the city\u2019s special transient occupancy (hotel/lodging bed) tax to allow its revenues to be used for tourism-related economic development projects that would create jobs and strengthen the local economy, subject to independent annual audits and full public disclosure of all spending, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 94298, "no_votes": 39489, "total_votes": 133787, "percent_yes": 70.48367928124556, "percent_no": 29.516320718754443, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended Sacramento's existing transient occupancy tax to allow re...", "summary_text": "The measure amended Sacramento's existing transient occupancy tax to allow revenues to be used for tourism-related economic development projects, with no change to the tax rate but expanded allowable uses of the funds. The spending would be subject to annual audits and public disclosure requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.223081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.723307", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2530, "fingerprint": "2022|202200307|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200307|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "f55ef552fe903e89", "measure_id": "202200307", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure entitled The City of Sacramento Emergency Shelter and Enforcement Act of 2022 \u2013 which requires identification of a minimum number of emergency shelter spaces based on the estimated number of homeless persons; conditions enforcement of the city\u2019s unlawful camping ordinance on shelter space availability; prohibits encampments; allows residents to bring action against the city for unlawful camping or storage on city property; and limits the city\u2019s annual general fund budget obligation to $5,000,000 \u2013 be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 70016, "no_votes": 64404, "total_votes": 134420, "percent_yes": 52.087486981104, "percent_no": 47.912513018896, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This Sacramento ordinance requires the city to provide a minimum number of em...", "summary_text": "This Sacramento ordinance requires the city to provide a minimum number of emergency shelter spaces based on homeless population estimates, conditions enforcement of camping bans on shelter availability, and caps the city's annual budget obligation for these services at $5 million. It also allows residents to sue the city over unlawful camping on city property while prohibiting encampments.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.223411", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.723469", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2520, "fingerprint": "2022|202200504|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200504|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "11abac1d726a4c5d", "measure_id": "202200504", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of educational facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Elverta Joint Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $4,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $239,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 434, "no_votes": 428, "total_votes": 862, "percent_yes": 50.34802784222738, "percent_no": 49.65197215777262, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Elverta Joint Elementary School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Elverta Joint Elementary School District to issue $4 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including electrical system upgrades, roof replacements, classroom modernization, and health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.220277", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.721902", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2521, "fingerprint": "2022|202200303|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200303|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "457619fdf4fe24e1", "measure_id": "202200303", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain Galt\u2019s long-term financial stability; maintain City services such as 911 emergency response, parks, trails, youth/afterschool programs; respond to property crimes/thefts/burglaries; retain/attract qualified police officers; improve local clean drinking water sources; retain/attract local businesses; for general government use; shall the measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $3,600,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, public spending disclosures, funds locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3884, "no_votes": 3489, "total_votes": 7373, "percent_yes": 52.67869252678693, "percent_no": 47.32130747321307, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Galt, California to generate a...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Galt, California to generate approximately $3.6 million annually for general city services including emergency response, parks, public safety, and infrastructure improvements. The tax will remain in effect until ended by voters and includes requirements for audits and public spending disclosures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.220589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.722063", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2522, "fingerprint": "2022|202200052|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200052|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "b76ca92b7760f05f", "measure_id": "202200052", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SACRAMENTO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prevent crime and better protect the lives and property of Rancho Murieta owners, residents, and businesses, continue to provide the current level of security patrols, and continue gated security 24 hours per day, year-round, shall the Rancho Murieta Community Services District ordinance to levy an annual supplemental security special tax of $316 per parcel, including an annual inflation adjustment, providing $872,000 annually in locally-controlled funding, until ended by voters be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1446, "no_votes": 2107, "total_votes": 3553, "percent_yes": 40.69800168871377, "percent_no": 59.30199831128623, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Rancho Murieta Community Services Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Rancho Murieta Community Services District to levy an annual special tax of $316 per parcel with inflation adjustments to fund security patrols and 24-hour gated security services. The tax would have generated approximately $872,000 annually in local funding until terminated by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.220906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.722228", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2537, "fingerprint": "2022|202200056|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200056|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "7c8635aa6f423f2e", "measure_id": "202200056", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance NO. 1024, \u201cAn Ordinance of San Benito County Board of Supervisors Regarding Term Limits for Members of the Board of Supervisors\u201d, which establishes a lifetime term limit of three terms for persons first assuming office on or after January 1, 2023, and two additional terms for any Board member who has previously served a term in office, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14710, "no_votes": 4319, "total_votes": 19029, "percent_yes": 77.30306374481056, "percent_no": 22.696936255189442, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "Ordinance No", "summary_text": "Ordinance No. 1024 establishes lifetime term limits for San Benito County Board of Supervisors members, allowing a maximum of three terms for those first taking office on or after January 1, 2023, and two additional terms for current members who have previously served.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.226149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.724580", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2538, "fingerprint": "2022|202200057|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200057|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "b4a8ce69079699e5", "measure_id": "202200057", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure be approved to amend the San Benito County General Plan to remove the commercial thoroughfare and commercial regional node land use designations from the General Plan text and maps and require a vote of the people for future amendments redesignating Agriculture, Rangeland, or Rural land use designations for other uses (e.g. residential, commercial, industrial, landfill), with limited exceptions, through 2050?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8443, "no_votes": 10787, "total_votes": 19230, "percent_yes": 43.90535621424857, "percent_no": 56.09464378575143, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.226428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.724744", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2539, "fingerprint": "2022|202200058|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200058|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "4d8115de7179d64c", "measure_id": "202200058", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure be adopted to amend San Benito County General Plan Health and Safety Element Policy HS-6.9 to establish a 3.5-mile radius buffer around the TriCal Property on Highway 25 that is authorized to handle bulk scale potentially hazardous chemicals such as chloropicrin or methyl bromide (or similar soil fumigants); to expand the list of specified new sensitive uses prohibited within the buffer zone to include retail, office, hospitality, manufacturing, and other commercial or industrial uses; and to adopt specified implementation measures?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6856, "no_votes": 12244, "total_votes": 19100, "percent_yes": 35.89528795811518, "percent_no": 64.10471204188482, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.226743", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.724899", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2534, "fingerprint": "2022|202200308|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200308|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "473c4a4c3b6d561b", "measure_id": "202200308", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted adding Section 2.04.300 to Chapter 2.04 of the Hollister Municipal Code to establish an eight consecutive year term limit on Mayoral service followed by a four-year \u201ccooling off\u201d period during which a person may not serve as Mayor, and a two consecutive four-year term limit on Councilmember service followed by a four-year \u201ccooling off\u201d period during which a person may not serve as a Councilmember?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7431, "no_votes": 3025, "total_votes": 10456, "percent_yes": 71.06924254016832, "percent_no": 28.930757459831682, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes term limits for Hollister city officials, limiting ma...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes term limits for Hollister city officials, limiting mayors to eight consecutive years of service and council members to two consecutive four-year terms. After reaching these limits, officials must wait through a four-year \"cooling off\" period before being eligible to serve in their respective positions again.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.225117", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.724115", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2535, "fingerprint": "2022|202200309|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200309|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "0483d4bcaf1a6379", "measure_id": "202200309", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Hollister re-establish the Hollister Motorcycle Rally to be conducted annually over the 4th of July weekend?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6672, "no_votes": 3914, "total_votes": 10586, "percent_yes": 63.02663895711317, "percent_no": 36.97336104288683, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the City of Hollister should re-es...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the City of Hollister should re-establish an annual motorcycle rally to be held during the 4th of July weekend. The measure passed, providing non-binding guidance to city officials on community support for reviving the event.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.225413", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.724279", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2536, "fingerprint": "2022|202200310|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200310|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "775c331706c18145", "measure_id": "202200310", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Hollister re-establish the Hollister Motorcycle Rally to be conducted annually over a week prior to/following the 4th of July weekend?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4480, "no_votes": 6056, "total_votes": 10536, "percent_yes": 42.5208807896735, "percent_no": 57.4791192103265, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.225733", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.724429", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2540, "fingerprint": "2022|202200311|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200311|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "a09ce0f72aebf6bb", "measure_id": "202200311", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Office of City Treasurer be Appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 444, "no_votes": 346, "total_votes": 790, "percent_yes": 56.20253164556962, "percent_no": 43.79746835443038, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the San Benito city treasurer position from an elected o...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the San Benito city treasurer position from an elected office to one appointed by the city government.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.227133", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.725049", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2541, "fingerprint": "2022|202200312|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200312|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "3bc36b13a41cfdf7", "measure_id": "202200312", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be Appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 455, "no_votes": 332, "total_votes": 787, "percent_yes": 57.814485387547656, "percent_no": 42.185514612452344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would change the City Clerk position in San Benito from an elect...", "summary_text": "This measure would change the City Clerk position in San Benito from an elected office to one appointed by the city government. The measure passed, meaning the City Clerk will now be appointed rather than elected by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.227409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.725195", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2533, "fingerprint": "2022|202200507|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200507|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "e7c4813426817a85", "measure_id": "202200507", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BENITO Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; construct, modernize, and upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; renovate plumbing; improve drinking water; make safety/security improvements; and replace roofs; shall Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $39,200,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,700,000 annually at a projected average rate less than 5 cents per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent oversight, no money for salaries, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 1, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School Di...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District to issue $39.2 million in bonds to construct, modernize, and upgrade school facilities including classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, drinking water systems, safety features, and roofs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a projected average rate of less than 5 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.224361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.723954", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BENITO Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2545, "fingerprint": "2022|202200317|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200317|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "892be384857e1043", "measure_id": "202200317", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Alan Lee be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember, Council District 1 of the City of Big Bear Lake?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 321, "no_votes": 114, "total_votes": 435, "percent_yes": 73.79310344827587, "percent_no": 26.206896551724128, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would recall (remove) Alan Lee from his position as City Council...", "summary_text": "This measure would recall (remove) Alan Lee from his position as City Councilmember for Council District 1 in Big Bear Lake, California. The measure passed, resulting in Lee's removal from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.228809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.726267", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2556, "fingerprint": "2022|202200510|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200510|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "814ef53444cdd599", "measure_id": "202200510", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade school fire/security/safety systems, science, engineering, math, arts, vocational classrooms; replace drinking water pipes, gas lines, leaky roofs, portable classrooms, electrical wiring; remove asbestos, lead paint, mold, shall Rialto Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $340,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation raising on average $16,314,271 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring independent audits/oversight, and all funds for local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12960, "no_votes": 5738, "total_votes": 18698, "percent_yes": 69.31222590651407, "percent_no": 30.687774093485928, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Rialto Unified School District to issue $340 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Rialto Unified School District to issue $340 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including upgraded safety systems, classroom renovations, infrastructure replacements, and hazardous material removal. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $16.3 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.232618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.727975", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2551, "fingerprint": "2022|202200508|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200508|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2c512f601fae80d0", "measure_id": "202200508", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve and repair facilities at Boron Schools, enhance student safety/security systems, acquire/construct/renovate District facilities, classrooms, and equipment, update heating/ air conditioning systems, make health/safety improvements, and improve student access to technology, shall this Muroc Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $21,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying 4.9\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value (averaging $1,140,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight and NO money for administrative salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1, "no_votes": 5, "total_votes": 6, "percent_yes": 16.666666666666664, "percent_no": 83.33333333333334, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.230998", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.727199", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2559, "fingerprint": "2022|202200509|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200509|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "39283fbfcc23f980", "measure_id": "202200509", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update and reconstruct local schools to expand science, technology, engineering, arts and math programs; provide equitable access to modernized classrooms/facilities; improve school safety and energy efficiency; construct and equip classrooms/facilities; shall Sierra Sands Unified School District issue $52,800,000 in bonds, at legal rates, raising an annual average of $2,800,000, at approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, and all funds remaining local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11, "no_votes": 34, "total_votes": 45, "percent_yes": 24.444444444444443, "percent_no": 75.55555555555556, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Sierra Sands Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Sierra Sands Unified School District to issue $52.8 million in bonds to update and reconstruct school facilities, expand STEAM programs, and improve safety and energy efficiency. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.233610", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.728451", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2557, "fingerprint": "2022|202200059|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200059|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4835764a7e4f4a2a", "measure_id": "202200059", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the amendments to the San Bernardino County Charter for taxpayer protection and government reform be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 241894, "no_votes": 173582, "total_votes": 415476, "percent_yes": 58.220932135670886, "percent_no": 41.779067864329114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This San Bernardino County charter amendment implements taxpayer protection m...", "summary_text": "This San Bernardino County charter amendment implements taxpayer protection measures and government reform changes to the county charter. The measure passed with 60.6% voter approval in 2022.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.232963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.728141", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2558, "fingerprint": "2022|202200060|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200060|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "750326088ddc8c68", "measure_id": "202200060", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure EE", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Do the people of San Bernardino County want San Bernardino County elected representatives to study and advocate for all options to obtain the County\u2019s fair share of state funding, up to and including secession from the State of California?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 212615, "no_votes": 207439, "total_votes": 420054, "percent_yes": 50.61611126188538, "percent_no": 49.38388873811462, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked San Bernardino County voters whether they wanted ...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked San Bernardino County voters whether they wanted their elected representatives to study and advocate for options to obtain more state funding, including the possibility of seceding from California. The measure passed, directing county officials to explore these options.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.233282", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.728288", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure EE", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2554, "fingerprint": "2022|202200324|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200324|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d231301b630045e8", "measure_id": "202200324", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Ordinance of the People of Redlands Amending Sections lA.0, lA.10, 1.A.30, 4.2B and 4.41j of the Principles of Managed Development of the City of Redlands General Plan 2035 be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8504, "no_votes": 13763, "total_votes": 22267, "percent_yes": 38.191045044235864, "percent_no": 61.808954955764136, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.231981", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.727677", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2542, "fingerprint": "2022|202200314|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200314|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4062052756692660", "measure_id": "202200314", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the electors repeal Measure G and return to five elected city council members and a mayor selected from among the five elected city council members?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1326, "no_votes": 2027, "total_votes": 3353, "percent_yes": 39.54667461974351, "percent_no": 60.45332538025649, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have repealed Measure G and changed San Bernardino's gover...", "summary_text": "This measure would have repealed Measure G and changed San Bernardino's government structure back to five elected city council members with the mayor selected from among those five council members, rather than having a directly elected mayor.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.227677", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.725347", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2549, "fingerprint": "2022|202200320|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200320|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b267353c402e608d", "measure_id": "202200320", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure II", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Shall the measure funding general Montclair services, including supporting 911 /police/fire response; preventing thefts/property crime; recruiting/retaining firefighters, paramedics; retaining local business/ jobs; repairing streets/potholes; addressing homelessness; by taxing cannabis retail, delivery, cultivation, manufacturing/testing businesses at a rate of not more than 7% of gross receipts, raising about $3,500,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits, spending disclosure, funds used locally, cannabis businesses follow laws protecting public health/safety, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2955, "no_votes": 2737, "total_votes": 5692, "percent_yes": 51.914968376669016, "percent_no": 48.085031623330984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure would impose a tax of up to 7% of gross receipts on can...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure would impose a tax of up to 7% of gross receipts on cannabis businesses in Montclair to fund general city services including police, fire, street repairs, and homelessness programs, generating approximately $3.5 million annually. The measure requires audits and spending disclosure, with funds designated for local use until terminated by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.230275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.726895", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure II", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2555, "fingerprint": "2022|202200325|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200325|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "447d628ab6aa13f6", "measure_id": "202200325", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted to increase the City's existing business license tax on distribution centers within the City from the current rate of four and seven-tenths cents ($0.047) per gross square foot to ten and one-half cents ($0.105) per square foot for the purpose of raising an estimated $530,000 in revenue annually until ended by voters to defray the costs of providing City services and to supplement the City's General Fund for general government use?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12135, "no_votes": 10584, "total_votes": 22719, "percent_yes": 53.41344249306748, "percent_no": 46.58655750693252, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased San Bernardino's business license tax on distribution ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased San Bernardino's business license tax on distribution centers from $0.047 to $0.105 per square foot to generate an estimated $530,000 annually for city services and the general fund. The tax increase will continue until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.232290", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.727825", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2561, "fingerprint": "2022|202200327|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200327|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a5dd9aefcbc090dc", "measure_id": "202200327", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund general services in the Town of Yucca Valley, such as: Police patrols/ 9-1-1 emergency response; Gang/ crime prevention; Street maintenance/ traffic management; Keeping parks/facilities safe and clean; Supporting fire protection; Affordable housing;  shall an ordinance be adopted changing the Town's existing transient occupancy tax (paid by hotel/ vacation rental guests) to 12%, providing an additional $1,300,000 annually for tion rental guests) to 12%, providing an additional $1,300,000 annually for general government use until ended by voters, with all funds locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4412, "no_votes": 1737, "total_votes": 6149, "percent_yes": 71.75150430964385, "percent_no": 28.24849569035615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Yucca Valley's transient occupancy tax on hotel and va...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Yucca Valley's transient occupancy tax on hotel and vacation rental guests to 12%, generating an estimated additional $1,300,000 annually for general municipal services including police, emergency response, street maintenance, parks, fire protection, and affordable housing. The tax revenue would be locally controlled and continue until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.234228", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.728783", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2560, "fingerprint": "2022|202200326|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200326|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "e66792d529df8f91", "measure_id": "202200326", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and prevent cuts to City of Upland services, such as 9-1-1 emergency response, police staff, patrols and public safety, gang and crime prevention programs, addressing homelessness, and maintenance of streets, sidewalks, parks and infrastructure, shall the measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax be adopted, providing approximately $16,000,000 annually for general city services until ended by voters, with citizen oversight, independent financial audits and disclosure, and money controlled locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10222, "no_votes": 12697, "total_votes": 22919, "percent_yes": 44.60054976220603, "percent_no": 55.39945023779397, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 1-cent sales tax in the City of Upland ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 1-cent sales tax in the City of Upland to generate approximately $16 million annually for general city services including emergency response, police, public safety programs, homelessness services, and infrastructure maintenance. The tax would have remained in effect until ended by voters and included provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.233904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.728622", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2548, "fingerprint": "2022|202200319|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200319|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ae57bbba053c48a3", "measure_id": "202200319", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, establishing a general Transient Occupancy Tax imposing a maximum tax rate of 10% of hotel charges upon guests staying in hotels (as defined) and generating approximately $10,000 (current estimate) to $250,000 (if a major hotel is developed within the City of Grand Terrace) in annual revenue until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1895, "no_votes": 1765, "total_votes": 3660, "percent_yes": 51.775956284153004, "percent_no": 48.224043715846996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a transient occupancy tax of up to 10% on hotel charg...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a transient occupancy tax of up to 10% on hotel charges for guests staying in hotels within the City of Grand Terrace. The tax is estimated to generate between $10,000 and $250,000 annually depending on hotel development in the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.229942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.726745", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2552, "fingerprint": "2022|202200322|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200322|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2746a76e4dd15d4f", "measure_id": "202200322", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and protect the level of essential services such as public safety, and other vital services including infrastructure, street repair and park improvements, shall a measure be adopted to amend the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) which is paid only by guests who stay in local hotels, motels and other lodgings, to also include and apply to \"short term residential rental units\" in the City of Needles?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 661, "no_votes": 348, "total_votes": 1009, "percent_yes": 65.51040634291377, "percent_no": 34.48959365708623, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended San Bernardino's Transient Occupancy Tax to extend cover...", "summary_text": "This measure amended San Bernardino's Transient Occupancy Tax to extend coverage from hotels and motels to include short-term residential rental units. The tax revenue is designated for essential services including public safety, infrastructure, street repair, and park improvements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.231362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.727361", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2543, "fingerprint": "2022|202200315|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200315|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "27abc66c3a7a2372", "measure_id": "202200315", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted to amend the Big Bear Lake Municipal Code to limit the number of vacation rental licenses the City may issue to a maximum of 1,500 and limit the number of vacation rental contracts to 30 per year per property, excluding home-sharing arrangements, limiting duplexes, triplexes and four-plexes to one vacation rental per property, and enacting additional further limitations and regulations for vacation rentals?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 832, "no_votes": 1178, "total_votes": 2010, "percent_yes": 41.39303482587064, "percent_no": 58.60696517412936, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.228115", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.725950", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2544, "fingerprint": "2022|202200316|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200316|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "29fb057c58e9498d", "measure_id": "202200316", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted to increase the maximum rate of the City's Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax charged to hotel and vacation rental guests from 8% to 9% as of January 1, 2024 and from 9% to 10%, as of January 1, 2025, providing until ended by voters an estimated $1,300,000 annually for City services including public safety response, street repair and maintenance, park and trail construction and maintenance and for general government use?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1044, "no_votes": 894, "total_votes": 1938, "percent_yes": 53.86996904024768, "percent_no": 46.13003095975232, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases San Bernardino's transient occupancy tax on hotel and v...", "summary_text": "The measure increases San Bernardino's transient occupancy tax on hotel and vacation rental guests from 8% to 9% in 2024 and to 10% in 2025, generating an estimated $1.3 million annually for city services including public safety, street maintenance, parks and trails, and general government operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.228481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.726114", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2553, "fingerprint": "2022|202200323|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200323|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "73f17ef1d47a26fa", "measure_id": "202200323", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To secure Ontario's long-term financial stability; maintain fire, police, 9-1-1 response, help prevent crime/thefts/burglaries; recruit/retain firefighters/paramedicis/police; repair streets/potholes; improve local drinking water sources; address homelessness; clean/maintain public areas; fund youth/aterschool programs; for general government use; shall the measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales taxes providing approximately $95,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits/public spending disclosure, funds locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15972, "no_votes": 14030, "total_votes": 30002, "percent_yes": 53.236450903273116, "percent_no": 46.763549096726884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Ontario, California, generatin...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Ontario, California, generating approximately $95 million annually for general government services including public safety, infrastructure, and community programs. The tax includes audit requirements and public spending disclosure, and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.231701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.727512", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2550, "fingerprint": "2022|202200321|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200321|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6ff6e129980e86af", "measure_id": "202200321", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure funding general Montclair services, including supporting 911/police/fire response; preventing thefts/property crime; recruiting/retaining firefighters, paramedics; retaining local business/ jobs; repairing streets/potholes; addressing homelessness; by taxing cannabis retail, delivery, cultivation, manufacturing/testing businesses at a rate of not more than 7% of gross receipts, raising about $3,500,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits, spending disclosure, funds used locally, cannabis businesses follow laws protecting public health/safety, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3974, "no_votes": 1685, "total_votes": 5659, "percent_yes": 70.22442127584378, "percent_no": 29.77557872415622, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposes a tax of up to 7% of gross receipts on cannabis retail, ...", "summary_text": "This measure imposes a tax of up to 7% of gross receipts on cannabis retail, delivery, cultivation, manufacturing, and testing businesses in Montclair to fund general city services. The tax is expected to generate approximately $3.5 million annually and includes requirements for audits, spending disclosure, and local use of funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.230691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.727046", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2547, "fingerprint": "2022|202200318|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200318|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "55173b57eb0f12e5", "measure_id": "202200318", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain funding for police patrols, to address homelessness, gang, drug and crime prevention, fire protection, paramedics, 911 emergency response, to maintain senior and youth services, library services, parks, sidewalks, roads, to clean and maintain public areas, and for general government use; shall a measure establishing a one-cent sales tax providing approximately $9,500,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits and guaranteeing all funds are controlled locally be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5110, "no_votes": 2551, "total_votes": 7661, "percent_yes": 66.70147500326328, "percent_no": 33.29852499673672, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in San Bernardino to generate a...", "summary_text": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in San Bernardino to generate approximately $9.5 million annually for police patrols, fire protection, emergency services, homelessness programs, parks, roads, libraries, and other city services. The tax continues indefinitely until voters choose to end it and requires independent audits with all funds remaining under local control.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.229603", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.726592", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2546, "fingerprint": "2022|202200313|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200313|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f2a56c3ae333170b", "measure_id": "202200313", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, an Ordinance No. 2022-001, entitled \"An Ordinance of the People of the City of Chino, California, to Approve the Housing Element Update to Include the Application of the Two Identified Overlay Strategies Encompassing Affordable Housing and Mixed-Uses the City Will Use to Meet its State-mandated Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation\" be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7983, "no_votes": 2736, "total_votes": 10719, "percent_yes": 74.4752308984047, "percent_no": 25.524769101595297, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure adopted an ordinance approving a Housing Element Update that incl...", "summary_text": "The measure adopted an ordinance approving a Housing Element Update that includes two overlay strategies for affordable housing and mixed-use development to help the City of Chino meet its state-mandated Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.229213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.726414", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2574, "fingerprint": "2022|202200061|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200061|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "22f370c87f823956", "measure_id": "202200061", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to fund general County purposes including but not limited to parks, fire safety, roads, health, and social equity, by taxing cannabis businesses in the unincorporated area on gross receipts at maximum 6% for retail, 3% for distribution, 2% for testing, cultivation at 3% or $10 (inflation adjustable) per canopy square foot, and 4% for other businesses, generating an estimated $2,930,000 to $5,600,000 annually until repealed by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 563512, "no_votes": 417402, "total_votes": 980914, "percent_yes": 57.44764576711108, "percent_no": 42.55235423288892, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a tax on cannabis businesses in unincorporated San D...", "summary_text": "This measure established a tax on cannabis businesses in unincorporated San Diego County areas, with rates ranging from 2% to 6% of gross receipts depending on the type of business operation. The tax revenue, estimated at $2.9 to $5.6 million annually, would fund general county services including parks, fire safety, roads, health programs, and social equity initiatives.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.238212", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.730743", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2575, "fingerprint": "2022|202200339|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200339|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "19d72b55c31bda96", "measure_id": "202200339", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the San Diego Municipal Code be amended so that all City residents receive comparable trash, recycling, and other solid waste management services, by allowing the City to recover its cost of providing these services to eligible residential properties, which could allow the City to provide additional services, such as weekly recycling, bulky item pickup, and curbside container replacement and delivery, at no extra charge?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 203223, "no_votes": 199384, "total_votes": 402607, "percent_yes": 50.47676766673207, "percent_no": 49.52323233326793, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Solid Waste", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends San Diego's Municipal Code to allow the city to recover c...", "summary_text": "This measure amends San Diego's Municipal Code to allow the city to recover costs for providing trash, recycling, and solid waste management services to eligible residential properties. It aims to ensure all city residents receive comparable waste services and could enable additional services like weekly recycling and bulky item pickup at no extra charge.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.238506", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.730893", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11058, "fingerprint": "2022|202200340|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200340|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "87ddbf648acf9c87", "measure_id": "202200340", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall People\u2019s Ordinance O-10960 be amended to exclude the Midway-Pacific Highway Community Plan area, which includes the Sports Arena, from the 30-foot height limit on buildings in the Coastal Zone, with any future development still required to comply with other governing laws?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 204238, "no_votes": 195156, "total_votes": 399394, "percent_yes": 51.13697251335773, "percent_no": 48.86302748664227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended San Diego's People's Ordinance O-10960 to exempt the Mid...", "summary_text": "This measure amended San Diego's People's Ordinance O-10960 to exempt the Midway-Pacific Highway Community Plan area, including the Sports Arena, from the 30-foot building height restriction in the Coastal Zone. Future development in this area would still need to comply with other applicable laws and regulations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.298682", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.238786", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.731041", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2562, "fingerprint": "2022|202200328|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200328|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "06ba91ff7cabe211", "measure_id": "202200328", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15701, "no_votes": 16586, "total_votes": 32287, "percent_yes": 48.629479357016756, "percent_no": 51.370520642983244, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.234538", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.728935", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2576, "fingerprint": "2022|202200341|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200341|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "32368995a730b40d", "measure_id": "202200341", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the San Diego Municipal code be amended to provide that the City of San Diego may preserve its ability to receive State infrastructure funding by allowing the use of Project Labor Agreements on City Construction Projects; requiring provisions in the agreements to prohibit employment discrimination and ensure open competition; expanding public disclosure; tracking local hiring requirements; and establishing a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Board?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 221282, "no_votes": 161766, "total_votes": 383048, "percent_yes": 57.76873916584867, "percent_no": 42.23126083415133, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended San Diego's Municipal Code to allow the city to use Proj...", "summary_text": "This measure amended San Diego's Municipal Code to allow the city to use Project Labor Agreements on construction projects in order to maintain eligibility for state infrastructure funding. The measure includes requirements for non-discrimination provisions, open competition, enhanced public disclosure, local hiring tracking, and establishment of a Citizens' Oversight Board.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.239138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.731203", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2567, "fingerprint": "2022|202200333|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200333|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "efa93afa766f4534", "measure_id": "202200333", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding for general services in the City of Escondido, such as police patrols, crime prevention, fire protection, paramedic, 911 emergency response; keeping streets, infrastructure, parks, and facilities safe, clean, and well maintained; reducing pension costs; addressing homelessness, traffic management, and other City services, shall an ordinance establishing a 3/4 cent sales tax be adopted, providing approximately $21,000,000 annually for City services for 15 years, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18155, "no_votes": 18602, "total_votes": 36757, "percent_yes": 49.391952553255166, "percent_no": 50.608047446744834, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.236137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.729686", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2568, "fingerprint": "2022|202200334|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200334|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bab4afc15f8bd865", "measure_id": "202200334", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To establish term limits of two terms for persons serving as Mayor, three terms for persons serving as a City Councilmember, and three terms for persons serving as the City Treasurer, whether consecutive or not, shall Ordinance 2022-20 amending the Escondido Municipal Code be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29730, "no_votes": 6232, "total_votes": 35962, "percent_yes": 82.6705967410044, "percent_no": 17.329403258995598, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes term limits for Escondido city officials, limiting m...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes term limits for Escondido city officials, limiting mayors to two terms, city council members to three terms, and city treasurers to three terms, regardless of whether the terms are served consecutively.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.236460", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.729837", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2569, "fingerprint": "2022|202200335|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200335|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "51213e0bdbae8694", "measure_id": "202200335", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To reduce city treasurer compensation to the same level as a city councilmember and to standardize vacancy procedures for all City of Escondido elected officials, shall Ordinance 2022-19 amending the Escondido Municipal Code be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29550, "no_votes": 5992, "total_votes": 35542, "percent_yes": 83.14107253390355, "percent_no": 16.858927466096446, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reduces the city treasurer's compensation to match that of city ...", "summary_text": "This measure reduces the city treasurer's compensation to match that of city councilmembers and standardizes the procedures for filling vacancies among all elected officials in Escondido.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.236731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.729987", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2577, "fingerprint": "2022|202200342|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200342|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "dad54f6793179a79", "measure_id": "202200342", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Article V, Section 55 be amended to authorize childcare on dedicated parkland property with \u201cchildcare\u201d meaning any State-licensed facility, other than in-home family day care, in which nonmedical care and supervision is provided for children under age 18 in a group setting for less than 24 hours per day, excluding educational or instructional use provided by public, private, home, or charter schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 260432, "no_votes": 118799, "total_votes": 379231, "percent_yes": 68.67371074622064, "percent_no": 31.326289253779365, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment authorizes state-licensed childcare facilities to oper...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment authorizes state-licensed childcare facilities to operate on dedicated parkland property in San Diego, defining childcare as group care for children under 18 provided for less than 24 hours per day, but excluding schools and in-home family day care.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.239442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.731364", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2563, "fingerprint": "2022|202200329|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200329|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f8fe40db9f6a5291", "measure_id": "202200329", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Do the voters of the City of Carlsbad approve spending existing city funds from various sources, including the General Fund, in an amount to exceed $1 million for the Monroe Street Pool Renovation/Replacement Project located at 3401 Monroe Street for an estimated cost range of $22 million up to $24 million, adjusted annually by the percentage increase in the regional construction cost index?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26576, "no_votes": 25291, "total_votes": 51867, "percent_yes": 51.23874525227987, "percent_no": 48.76125474772013, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Facilities: Sports Facilities", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Carlsbad to spend existing city funds exc...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Carlsbad to spend existing city funds exceeding $1 million, with an estimated total cost of $22-24 million, for renovating or replacing the Monroe Street Pool. The funding would come from various city sources including the General Fund, with costs adjusted annually based on regional construction cost increases.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.234871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.729082", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2564, "fingerprint": "2022|202200330|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200330|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "cd46de0a4bb9059e", "measure_id": "202200330", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure modifying the City Charter to conform with State laws, eliminate outdated provisions, clarify ambiguous terms, reorganize and reformat to improve usability, require residency and increased experience for the elected City Attorney, remove the requirement that most board and commission members be qualified electors, and to allow City Council to take action at special Council meetings, use mail ballot elections to fill vacancies, and approve bonded debt under State general laws be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39875, "no_votes": 22850, "total_votes": 62725, "percent_yes": 63.571143882024714, "percent_no": 36.428856117975286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure modified San Diego's City Charter to align with state laws, elim...", "summary_text": "This measure modified San Diego's City Charter to align with state laws, eliminate outdated provisions, and make organizational improvements, while also requiring the elected City Attorney to be a resident with increased experience, removing voting eligibility requirements for most board and commission members, and allowing the City Council additional procedural flexibility for special meetings, vacancy elections, and debt approval. The measure passed with 60.6% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.235167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.729229", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2566, "fingerprint": "2022|202200332|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200332|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "023138cd89923e25", "measure_id": "202200332", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund general municipal expenses including law enforcement, fire, emergency medical services, street improvements and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis and hemp businesses at annual rates of between 4% to 7% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, 1% to 4% for non-retail cannabis businesses, and $2.00 to $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation; expected to generate an estimated $800,000 to $1,400,000 annually and will be levied until repealed/modified by the voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19519, "no_votes": 10461, "total_votes": 29980, "percent_yes": 65.10673782521681, "percent_no": 34.89326217478319, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes San Diego to tax cannabis and hemp businesses at rate...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes San Diego to tax cannabis and hemp businesses at rates of 4-7% of gross receipts for retail operations, 1-4% for non-retail businesses, and $2-10 per square foot for cultivation operations. The tax is expected to generate $800,000 to $1,400,000 annually to fund general municipal services including law enforcement, fire, emergency medical services, street improvements, and recreation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.235830", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.729532", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2572, "fingerprint": "2022|202200337|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200337|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5c433e442cdd4916", "measure_id": "202200337", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be Appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4789, "no_votes": 3916, "total_votes": 8705, "percent_yes": 55.01435956346927, "percent_no": 44.98564043653073, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the San Diego City Clerk position from an elected office...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the San Diego City Clerk position from an elected office to one appointed by the city government. The measure passed, making the City Clerk an appointive rather than elected position.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.237615", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.730448", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2573, "fingerprint": "2022|202200338|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200338|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3bd1bf7f323596e3", "measure_id": "202200338", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Office of City Treasurer be Appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4573, "no_votes": 4128, "total_votes": 8701, "percent_yes": 52.5571773359384, "percent_no": 47.4428226640616, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the San Diego City Treasurer position from an elected of...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the San Diego City Treasurer position from an elected office to one appointed by the city government. The measure passed, making the City Treasurer an appointive rather than elected position.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.237925", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.730597", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2565, "fingerprint": "2022|202200331|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200331|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9b91358c894f2c01", "measure_id": "202200331", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to repeal Proposition J, a half-cent sales tax, and adopt a one-cent sales tax effective until repealed by the voters, controlled locally and with independent citizen oversight, providing approximately $24,000,000 annually to fund general city services, which could include adding police officers, abating homeless encampments, increasing funding for homeless intervention efforts, expanding fire services, ensuring rapid 911 emergency response, increasing funding for roads, and enhancing parks, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8302, "no_votes": 12806, "total_votes": 21108, "percent_yes": 39.33105931400417, "percent_no": 60.66894068599583, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have repealed San Diego's existing half-cent sales tax (Pr...", "summary_text": "This measure would have repealed San Diego's existing half-cent sales tax (Proposition J) and replaced it with a one-cent sales tax to fund general city services including police, fire, emergency response, roads, parks, and homeless services. The measure would have generated approximately $24 million annually with local control and citizen oversight until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.235544", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.729381", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2571, "fingerprint": "2022|202200511|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200511|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "14d386855d12e0e7", "measure_id": "202200511", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Lemon Grove School District\u2019s measure to replace aging roofs; upgrade STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, math) classrooms; increase computer access; and replace portables with permanent classrooms be adopted, authorizing $27 million of bonds with legal rates, levies below $30/$100,000 of assessed valuation (generating $1.6 million/year through 2053), annual audits, independent oversight, state matching funds and no tax rate increase", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5983, "no_votes": 2640, "total_votes": 8623, "percent_yes": 69.38420503305113, "percent_no": 30.61579496694887, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Lemon Grove School District to issue $27 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Lemon Grove School District to issue $27 million in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including roof replacements, STEAM classroom upgrades, increased computer access, and replacement of portable classrooms with permanent ones. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies below $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $1.6 million annually through 2053.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.237344", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.730285", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2570, "fingerprint": "2022|202200336|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200336|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5ac3ee28da12433c", "measure_id": "202200336", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to maintain quality of life for residents, retain local businesses, jobs; keep neighborhoods, beaches, parks, public areas safe/clean, maintain 911 emergency response; reduce traffic congestion; gain community benefit from tourism by increasing the transient occupancy tax (paid by hotel, motel, short-term rental guests) by 4%, providing about $400,000 annually until ended by voters, with annual audits, public disclosure of spending, all funds for Imperial Beach, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3904, "no_votes": 1892, "total_votes": 5796, "percent_yes": 67.3567977915804, "percent_no": 32.643202208419595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel, motel, and ...", "summary_text": "This measure increases the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel, motel, and short-term rental guests by 4% in Imperial Beach. The tax is expected to generate approximately $400,000 annually for city services, with annual audits and public disclosure of spending required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.237030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.730136", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2579, "fingerprint": "2022|202200343|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200343|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "744cb5249d051bc9", "measure_id": "202200343", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and prevent cuts to City of Solana Beach services, such as: maintaining streets, parks, beaches, infrastructure, and storm drains; fire protection, paramedic and 911 emergency response; police patrols, crime prevention, traffic management, graffiti/ trash removal; addressing homelessness; and other city services, shall an ordinance establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax be adopted, providing approximately $3,000,000 annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4363, "no_votes": 2178, "total_votes": 6541, "percent_yes": 66.70233909188198, "percent_no": 33.29766090811802, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Solana Beach to generate appro...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Solana Beach to generate approximately $3 million annually for general city services including street maintenance, parks, emergency services, police patrols, and other municipal operations. The tax continues until voters choose to end it and includes provisions for independent audits with local control of funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.240051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.731693", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2578, "fingerprint": "2022|202200512|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200512|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "57a987ba4c2f0dfb", "measure_id": "202200512", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN DIEGO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve all public schools by: \u2022 Repairing leaky roofs/plumbing; \u2022 Providing safe drinking water; \u2022 Removing asbestos, lead paint, mold; \u2022 Improving classroom security/communications, systems, cameras, door locks to protect against school shootings; \u2022 Upgrading career, science, technology, engineering, math classrooms; shall San Diego Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $3,200,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, averaging $330,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring public spending disclosures, audits, citizens oversight, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 199223, "no_votes": 105712, "total_votes": 304935, "percent_yes": 65.33293980684408, "percent_no": 34.66706019315592, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the San Diego Unified School District to issue $3", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the San Diego Unified School District to issue $3.2 billion in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including repairs, safety upgrades, and classroom modernization. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.239754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.731528", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN DIEGO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11067, "fingerprint": "2022|202200513|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200513|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ee8b2e230ef05172", "measure_id": "202200513", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Alison Collins be recalled (removed) from the School Board for the San Francisco Unified School District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134871, "no_votes": 41928, "total_votes": 176799, "percent_yes": 76.284933738313, "percent_no": 23.715066261687, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked San Francisco voters whether to recall Alison Colli...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked San Francisco voters whether to recall Alison Collins from the San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education. The measure passed, resulting in Collins' removal from the school board.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-02-15", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.304073", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.247562", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.739100", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11059, "fingerprint": "2022|202200070|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200070|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "7b361a527e6b2413", "measure_id": "202200070", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to allow City employees who retired before November 6, 1996, to receive a supplemental cost of living adjustment to their pensions even if the retirement system is not fully funded and allow the Retirement Board to have an individual employment contract with its executive director?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 187939, "no_votes": 100869, "total_votes": 288808, "percent_yes": 65.07402842026536, "percent_no": 34.925971579734636, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends San Francisco's Charter to allow pre-1996 retirees to rec...", "summary_text": "This measure amends San Francisco's Charter to allow pre-1996 retirees to receive supplemental cost-of-living pension adjustments regardless of the retirement system's funding status and permits the Retirement Board to enter into individual employment contracts with its executive director.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.301139", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.242684", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.735140", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2580, "fingerprint": "2022|202200062|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200062|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f4f6799fb9f282a4", "measure_id": "202200062", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To increase Muni\u2019s reliability, safety and frequency, reduce delays, improve disabled access and equity, increase subway capacity and improve pedestrian, bicycle, and traffic safety by repairing, constructing and improving deteriorating Muni bus yards, facilities, transportation infrastructure and equipment, and constructing and redesigning streets and sidewalks, and to pay related costs; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $400,000,000 in general obligation bonds, with a duration of up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.010/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of approximately $30,000,000, subject to citizen oversight and independent audits? The City\u2019s current debt management policy is to keep the property tax rate for City general obligation bonds at or below the 2006 rate by issuing new bonds as older ones are retired and/or the tax base grows, though this property tax rate may vary based on other factors.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 138730, "no_votes": 74350, "total_votes": 213080, "percent_yes": 65.10700206495214, "percent_no": 34.89299793504786, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Transport: Mass Transit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized San Francisco to issue $400 million in gen...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized San Francisco to issue $400 million in general obligation bonds over 30 years to repair and improve Muni bus facilities, transportation infrastructure, and street redesigns. The bonds would have been funded through property taxes at an estimated rate of $0.010 per $100 of assessed property value, generating approximately $30 million annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.240361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.731857", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11068, "fingerprint": "2022|202200514|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200514|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d535bf56868e17a4", "measure_id": "202200514", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Gabriela L\u00f3pez be recalled (removed) from the School Board for the San Francisco Unified School District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 127022, "no_votes": 49257, "total_votes": 176279, "percent_yes": 72.05736361109378, "percent_no": 27.942636388906223, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Gabriela L\u00f3pez from her po...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Gabriela L\u00f3pez from her position on the San Francisco Unified School District Board. The measure passed, resulting in L\u00f3pez's removal from the school board.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-02-15", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.304308", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.247973", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.739248", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11060, "fingerprint": "2022|202200071|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200071|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0197bbe3ea9dd3d5", "measure_id": "202200071", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to eliminate the Department of Sanitation and Streets and transfer its duties back to the Department of Public Works and to retain the Sanitation and Streets Commission and Public Works Commission?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 212066, "no_votes": 72349, "total_votes": 284415, "percent_yes": 74.56217147478156, "percent_no": 25.437828525218436, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure eliminates the Department of Sanitation and Streets and transfer...", "summary_text": "This measure eliminates the Department of Sanitation and Streets and transfers its duties back to the Department of Public Works, while keeping both the Sanitation and Streets Commission and Public Works Commission.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.301324", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.243026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.735517", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2581, "fingerprint": "2022|202200063|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200063|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "314d854a2be3e954", "measure_id": "202200063", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to change the appointment process and qualifications for Building Inspection Commission members and have the Mayor appoint the Director of the Department of Building Inspection?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 129230, "no_votes": 79234, "total_votes": 208464, "percent_yes": 61.9915189193338, "percent_no": 38.0084810806662, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended San Francisco's Charter to change how Building Inspectio...", "summary_text": "This measure amended San Francisco's Charter to change how Building Inspection Commission members are appointed and their required qualifications, and gave the Mayor authority to appoint the Director of the Department of Building Inspection.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.240695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.732138", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11069, "fingerprint": "2022|202200515|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200515|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1a24de93d460a2d3", "measure_id": "202200515", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Faauuga Moliga be recalled (removed) from the School Board for the San Francisco Unified School District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121197, "no_votes": 54785, "total_votes": 175982, "percent_yes": 68.8689752361037, "percent_no": 31.131024763896306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked San Francisco voters whether to recall (remove) Faa...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked San Francisco voters whether to recall (remove) Faauuga Moliga from the San Francisco Unified School District Board. The recall passed, resulting in Moliga's removal from the school board position.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-02-15", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.304564", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.248363", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.739398", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11061, "fingerprint": "2022|202200072|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200072|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ff320b910bea935d", "measure_id": "202200072", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to establish a Homelessness Oversight Commission to oversee the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing and require the City Controller to conduct audits of services for people experiencing homelessness?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 196152, "no_votes": 94991, "total_votes": 291143, "percent_yes": 67.3730778346036, "percent_no": 32.626922165396394, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment establishes a Homelessness Oversight Commission to ove...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment establishes a Homelessness Oversight Commission to oversee San Francisco's Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing and mandates that the City Controller conduct audits of homeless services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.301510", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.243321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.735898", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2582, "fingerprint": "2022|202200064|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200064|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "156afed75e1ca1f1", "measure_id": "202200064", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to further limit the period during which the voters could recall a City elected official, and when an official is recalled, to prevent the person appointed to fill that vacancy from running as a candidate to remain in that office?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89731, "no_votes": 123685, "total_votes": 213416, "percent_yes": 42.04511376841474, "percent_no": 57.95488623158526, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have shortened the time period during which San Francisco ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have shortened the time period during which San Francisco voters could recall elected city officials and prohibited appointed replacements from running for election to permanently fill the same office they were appointed to after a recall.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.240966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.732516", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11062, "fingerprint": "2022|202200073|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200073|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3e700dd6045867b9", "measure_id": "202200073", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City amend the Charter to streamline approval of affordable housing that provides (1) housing for households with income up to 140% of area median income (AMI) but where the average household income is no more than 120% of AMI, (2) additional affordable housing units equal to 15% of the required number of affordable on-site units, or (3) housing for households that include at least one School District or City College employee, with certain household income restrictions; and to no longer require Board of Supervisors' approval for those types of projects if they use City property or financing?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 141507, "no_votes": 146158, "total_votes": 287665, "percent_yes": 49.19159438930701, "percent_no": 50.80840561069299, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended San Francisco's Charter to streamline approva...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended San Francisco's Charter to streamline approval for certain affordable housing projects by removing the requirement for Board of Supervisors approval when they use city property or financing. The streamlined approval would apply to housing for households earning up to 140% of area median income (with project averages capped at 120% AMI), projects providing 15% additional affordable units beyond requirements, or housing for school district and city college employees meeting income restrictions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.301701", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.243590", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.736266", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2583, "fingerprint": "2022|202200065|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200065|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "4eb17f2f7830ca21", "measure_id": "202200065", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City create an Office of Victim and Witness Rights that would provide or coordinate existing City services and seek to establish programs that provide free legal services for domestic violence victims?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125795, "no_votes": 87128, "total_votes": 212923, "percent_yes": 59.080043020246755, "percent_no": 40.919956979753245, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure creates an Office of Victim and Witness Rights in San Francisco t...", "summary_text": "The measure creates an Office of Victim and Witness Rights in San Francisco that would coordinate existing city services and work to establish programs providing free legal services for domestic violence victims.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.241255", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.733001", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11063, "fingerprint": "2022|202200074|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200074|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2155b57548979f22", "measure_id": "202200074", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to streamline approval of affordable housing that provides (1) housing for households with income up to 120% of area median income (AMI) but where the average household income is no more than 80% of AMI, (2) additional affordable housing units equal to 8% of the total number of units in the entire project, or (3) housing for households that include at least one School District or City College employee, with certain household income restrictions; and to continue requiring Board of Supervisors' approval for those types of projects if they use City property or financing?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 131569, "no_votes": 154021, "total_votes": 285590, "percent_yes": 46.0691900976925, "percent_no": 53.9308099023075, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended San Francisco's Charter to streamline approva...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended San Francisco's Charter to streamline approval processes for certain types of affordable housing projects, including those serving households up to 120% of area median income (with project averages at 80% AMI), projects with at least 8% additional affordable units, and housing for school district or city college employees. The measure would have maintained Board of Supervisors approval requirements for projects using city property or financing.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.301890", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.243879", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.736652", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2584, "fingerprint": "2022|202200066|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200066|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "237166e4e016300a", "measure_id": "202200066", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend its behested payments law to prevent Board of Supervisors (Board) members from seeking behested payments from contractors who received Board approval and to allow further changes to this law only if the City\u2019s Ethics Commission and two-thirds of the Board approve those amendments?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 144114, "no_votes": 63520, "total_votes": 207634, "percent_yes": 69.40770779352128, "percent_no": 30.592292206478717, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Contracting/Bidding/Leasing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended San Francisco's behested payments law to prohibit Board ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended San Francisco's behested payments law to prohibit Board of Supervisors members from soliciting behested payments from contractors who received Board approval, and requires both Ethics Commission approval and a two-thirds Board majority to make future changes to this law.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.241558", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.733463", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11064, "fingerprint": "2022|202200075|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200075|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1c4def6fa45833e6", "measure_id": "202200075", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to renew the Library Preservation Fund for 25 years, allow the City to temporarily freeze the annual minimum funding for the Library when the City anticipates a budget deficit over $300 million, and require the Library to increase the minimum hours the Main Library and its branches must be open per week?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 239141, "no_votes": 50453, "total_votes": 289594, "percent_yes": 82.57802302533892, "percent_no": 17.421976974661078, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews San Francisco's Library Preservation Fund for 25 years an...", "summary_text": "This measure renews San Francisco's Library Preservation Fund for 25 years and requires libraries to increase their minimum weekly operating hours, while allowing the city to temporarily freeze minimum library funding during anticipated budget deficits exceeding $300 million.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.302078", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.244173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.737004", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2585, "fingerprint": "2022|202200067|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200067|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2ee2cce8f660fa9b", "measure_id": "202200067", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City change the membership of the Refuse Rate Board, how refuse rates and regulations are set and the rules governing future changes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 144129, "no_votes": 59796, "total_votes": 203925, "percent_yes": 70.67745494667157, "percent_no": 29.322545053328426, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Solid Waste", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changes the composition of San Francisco's Refuse Rate Board and...", "summary_text": "This measure changes the composition of San Francisco's Refuse Rate Board and modifies the processes for setting refuse rates, regulations, and future amendments to those rules.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.241840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.734035", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11065, "fingerprint": "2022|202200076|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200076|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "eaa3789543f5d80c", "measure_id": "202200076", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to provide additional funding for grants to the San Francisco Unified School District for 15 years to improve student academic achievement and social/emotional wellness?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 226718, "no_votes": 64768, "total_votes": 291486, "percent_yes": 77.78006490877777, "percent_no": 22.219935091222226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment provides additional city funding for grants to the San...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment provides additional city funding for grants to the San Francisco Unified School District over a 15-year period, with the stated purpose of improving student academic achievement and social/emotional wellness.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.302264", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.244436", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.737368", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2586, "fingerprint": "2022|202200068|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200068|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "7465e7169693d2f6", "measure_id": "202200068", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City require employers with more than 100 employees worldwide to provide paid public health emergency leave, not to exceed 80 hours a year, for their employees in San Francisco?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 137842, "no_votes": 76077, "total_votes": 213919, "percent_yes": 64.43653906385127, "percent_no": 35.56346093614873, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure requires employers with more than 100 employees worldwide to pro...", "summary_text": "This measure requires employers with more than 100 employees worldwide to provide up to 80 hours of paid public health emergency leave per year to their San Francisco employees.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.242106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.734483", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11066, "fingerprint": "2022|202200077|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200077|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b5a49ee868472faf", "measure_id": "202200077", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to hold elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney and Treasurer in November of presidential election years, extend the current terms of these officials by one year to January 2025, provide that there would be no regularly scheduled election in 2023, hold elections for local ballot measures only in even-numbered years or in special elections, and change the minimum number of signatures required for voters to place ordinances and declarations of policy on the ballot?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 203855, "no_votes": 82391, "total_votes": 286246, "percent_yes": 71.21671569209701, "percent_no": 28.78328430790299, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment moved elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney,...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment moved elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney and Treasurer from odd-numbered years to November of presidential election years, extended current officials' terms by one year to January 2025, and restricted local ballot measures to even-numbered years while changing signature requirements for citizen-initiated measures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.302449", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.244726", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.737687", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2587, "fingerprint": "2022|202200069|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200069|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "af4c6e577afd21bf", "measure_id": "202200069", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Chesa Boudin be recalled (removed) from the Office of District Attorney?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 122588, "no_votes": 100177, "total_votes": 222765, "percent_yes": 55.03018876394407, "percent_no": 44.96981123605593, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Chesa Boudin from his position as...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Chesa Boudin from his position as San Francisco District Attorney. The recall passed, resulting in Boudin's removal from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.242383", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.734809", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2588, "fingerprint": "2022|202200078|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200078|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b905dc514efa116c", "measure_id": "202200078", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City allow private motor vehicles on John F. Kennedy Drive and connector streets in Golden Gate Park at all times except from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Sundays and legal holidays year-round, as well as on Saturdays in April through September, allow motor vehicles in both directions at all times on the Great Highway and not allow the City to remove the Great Highway between Sloat and Skyline boulevards as proposed?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 102689, "no_votes": 191641, "total_votes": 294330, "percent_yes": 34.88907009139402, "percent_no": 65.11092990860598, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have reopened John F", "summary_text": "This measure would have reopened John F. Kennedy Drive in Golden Gate Park to private vehicles most days (except Sunday mornings and Saturday mornings in summer months), restored two-way traffic on the Great Highway at all times, and prohibited the city from removing the Great Highway between Sloat and Skyline boulevards.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.245044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.737939", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2589, "fingerprint": "2022|202200079|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200079|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "31ef323a5737da40", "measure_id": "202200079", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City affirm the ordinance the Board of Supervisors adopted in May 2022 reserving portions of John F. Kennedy Drive and certain connector streets in Golden Gate Park as open recreation spaces, closing those streets seven days a week to private motor vehicles with limited exceptions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 181694, "no_votes": 106408, "total_votes": 288102, "percent_yes": 63.0658586195167, "percent_no": 36.9341413804833, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Facilities: Parks & Recreation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure affirmed a 2022 ordinance that permanently closes portions of John F", "summary_text": "The measure affirmed a 2022 ordinance that permanently closes portions of John F. Kennedy Drive and connector streets in Golden Gate Park to private motor vehicles seven days a week, reserving these areas as open recreation spaces with limited exceptions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.245340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.738183", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2590, "fingerprint": "2022|202200080|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200080|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d5015489a49f0fa9", "measure_id": "202200080", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City continue a one-half cent sales tax to 2053 and generate estimated annual revenue of $100\u2013236 million to pay for transportation projects described in a new 30-year spending plan, allow the Transportation Authority to issue up to $1.91 billion in bonds to pay for these projects, and increase the total amount of money the Transportation Authority may spend each year for the next four years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 209246, "no_votes": 82220, "total_votes": 291466, "percent_yes": 71.79087783823842, "percent_no": 28.209122161761584, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues San Francisco's existing half-cent sales tax through 2...", "summary_text": "This measure continues San Francisco's existing half-cent sales tax through 2053 to fund transportation projects under a new 30-year spending plan, with estimated annual revenue of $100-236 million. It also authorizes the Transportation Authority to issue up to $1.91 billion in bonds and increases their annual spending capacity for the next four years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.245619", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.738383", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2591, "fingerprint": "2022|202200081|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200081|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d4d01edeccf6e09b", "measure_id": "202200081", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City tax owners of vacant residential units in buildings with three or more units, if those owners have kept those units vacant for more than 182 days in a calendar year, at a rate between $2,500\u20135,000 per vacant unit in 2024 and up to $20,000 in later years with adjustments for inflation, to generate estimated annual revenue of $20\u201337 million, with the tax continuing until December 31, 2053, and use those funds for rent subsidies and affordable housing?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 159374, "no_votes": 132989, "total_votes": 292363, "percent_yes": 54.512369896327506, "percent_no": 45.487630103672494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposes a tax of $2,500-$5,000 per unit (escalating to up to $20...", "summary_text": "This measure imposes a tax of $2,500-$5,000 per unit (escalating to up to $20,000 in later years) on owners of residential units in buildings with three or more units that remain vacant for more than 182 days per year. The tax revenue, estimated at $20-37 million annually, would fund rent subsidies and affordable housing programs through December 31, 2053.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.246223", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.738606", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2592, "fingerprint": "2022|202200082|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200082|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "8a0cbec0af3f8016", "measure_id": "202200082", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City be allowed to use public funds to acquire, operate or subsidize public parking in the underground parking garage below the Music Concourse in Golden Gate Park, and direct the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority to dissolve, transferring management of the garage to the City's Recreation and Park Commission?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 212678, "no_votes": 72117, "total_votes": 284795, "percent_yes": 74.67757509787742, "percent_no": 25.322424902122577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Facilities: Parks & Recreation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows San Francisco to use public funds to acquire, operate, or...", "summary_text": "This measure allows San Francisco to use public funds to acquire, operate, or subsidize the underground parking garage beneath the Music Concourse in Golden Gate Park. It also directs the dissolution of the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority and transfers garage management to the city's Recreation and Park Commission.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.246743", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.738781", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2593, "fingerprint": "2022|202200083|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200083|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "95a851bff06973ed", "measure_id": "202200083", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City establish an additional parcel tax on some San Francisco property owners based on the square footage and use of their properties, at rates between $150\u20134,000 per parcel with adjustments for inflation, to generate approximately $37 million in annual revenue, beginning on July 1, 2023 and continuing until June 30, 2043, and transfer those funds to City College for student and workforce development programs?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 106513, "no_votes": 183968, "total_votes": 290481, "percent_yes": 36.66780271343048, "percent_no": 63.33219728656952, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a parcel tax on San Francisco properties r...", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a parcel tax on San Francisco properties ranging from $150 to $4,000 based on square footage and use, generating approximately $37 million annually from 2023 to 2043. The revenue would have been transferred to City College to fund student and workforce development programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.247158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.738934", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2595, "fingerprint": "2022|202200344|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200344|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "1ecde996d9f65b86", "measure_id": "202200344", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To ensure large businesses pay a proportionate share and provide funding for City services such as: repairing potholes/streets; keeping public areas healthy/safe/clean; maintaining neighborhood police patrols/9-1-1 emergency response/fire protection; supporting our economy/ general government use, shall the measure to update the City of Tracy business taxes be adopted with typical rates between 0.1% and 0.3% of gross receipts, as described in the measure, providing an additional $3,200,000 annually, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15937, "no_votes": 6244, "total_votes": 22181, "percent_yes": 71.84978134439385, "percent_no": 28.150218655606153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure updates Tracy's business tax structure to impose rates between 0", "summary_text": "This measure updates Tracy's business tax structure to impose rates between 0.1% and 0.3% of gross receipts on large businesses, generating approximately $3.2 million annually for city services including street repairs, public safety, and general government operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.249166", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.739714", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2594, "fingerprint": "2022|202200516|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200516|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "3534af74b3383a60", "measure_id": "202200516", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Stockton Unified School District\u2019s measure to expand career/technical education training facilities including engineering, health care and information technology; repair roofs/plumbing; and improve student safety/classroom security be adopted, authorizing $215 million of bonds with legal rates, projected levies averaging below 5\u00a2/$100 of assessed valuation (averaging $14 million/year for 28 years), annual audits, independent oversight and no increase in current taxes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20882, "no_votes": 8641, "total_votes": 29523, "percent_yes": 70.73129424516479, "percent_no": 29.26870575483521, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes Stockton Unified School District to issue $215 million...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes Stockton Unified School District to issue $215 million in bonds to expand career and technical education facilities, repair infrastructure like roofs and plumbing, and improve student safety and classroom security. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging below 5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation over 28 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.248815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.739547", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2600, "fingerprint": "2022|202200084|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200084|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "8619dc47d71f76f2", "measure_id": "202200084", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain rapid response times for 911 medical emergency/fire protection services, provide 24-hours a day, 7-days a week staffed medical emergency/fire vehicles, shall Oceano Community Services District Ordinance No. 2022-1 levying an annual special tax of $180.00 per parcel, providing $410,760 a year, subject to annual maximum increases capped at 2%, until repealed by voters, and requiring independent citizen oversight and annual reports, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 775, "no_votes": 567, "total_votes": 1342, "percent_yes": 57.74962742175857, "percent_no": 42.25037257824143, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a $180 annual special tax per parcel in t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a $180 annual special tax per parcel in the Oceano Community Services District to fund 24/7 staffed medical emergency and fire protection services. The tax would have generated approximately $410,760 annually with a maximum 2% yearly increase cap and would have remained in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.250715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.740472", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2599, "fingerprint": "2022|202200348|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200348|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "304e596727dea9ad", "measure_id": "202200348", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, to exclusively fund City of Morro Bay owned harbor infrastructure (such as docks, piers, Harbor Walk, sea walls, public restrooms, revetments, launch ramps) through preventative maintenance and capital improvements, revenues used only for these purposes and unable to be used for any other purpose, providing approximately $680,000 annually, through annual $120 special parcel tax on all parcels of taxable real property, adjusted for inflation, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2049, "no_votes": 3679, "total_votes": 5728, "percent_yes": 35.77164804469274, "percent_no": 64.22835195530726, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a $120 annual special parcel tax on all taxab...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a $120 annual special parcel tax on all taxable real property in Morro Bay to fund maintenance and improvements to city-owned harbor infrastructure including docks, piers, and related facilities. The tax would have generated approximately $680,000 annually with inflation adjustments and could only be ended by future voter action.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.250421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.740318", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2601, "fingerprint": "2022|202200517|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200517|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "1b3e279f01d2498c", "measure_id": "202200517", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace roofs; upgrade and renovate 50 to 60-year-old classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; provide equity at sites; and make safety/security improvements; shall San Luis Coastal Unified School District\u2019s measure be approved authorizing $349,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying an estimated 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed value generating on average $17,970,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all funds spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22144, "no_votes": 12925, "total_votes": 35069, "percent_yes": 63.144087370612226, "percent_no": 36.855912629387774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized San Luis Coastal Unified School District to issue $349...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized San Luis Coastal Unified School District to issue $349 million in bonds to repair and upgrade aging school facilities, including roofs, classrooms, restrooms, and security systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of approximately 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.251067", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.740621", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2596, "fingerprint": "2022|202200345|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200345|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "d83111c63babf8a4", "measure_id": "202200345", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding for general governmental use in Arroyo Grande, including maintenance and repair of streets, sidewalks, stormwater and drainage facilities, and for other City programs and facilities, shall an ordinance establishing a one percent sales tax be adopted, providing approximately $5,600,000 annually until ended by the City Council and requiring annual reports on revenues and expenditures, and review and public hearing by the City Council every five years on its necessity?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4010, "no_votes": 4777, "total_votes": 8787, "percent_yes": 45.635598042562876, "percent_no": 54.364401957437124, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 1% sales tax in Arroyo Grande to fund g...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 1% sales tax in Arroyo Grande to fund general government operations, including street and infrastructure maintenance, generating approximately $5.6 million annually. The tax would have continued indefinitely until terminated by the City Council, with required annual reporting and five-year public reviews.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.249437", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.739866", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2597, "fingerprint": "2022|202200346|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200346|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "6f7c637c6263ef1a", "measure_id": "202200346", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Office of City Treasurer be Appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3781, "no_votes": 6094, "total_votes": 9875, "percent_yes": 38.28860759493671, "percent_no": 61.71139240506329, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.249783", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.740019", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2598, "fingerprint": "2022|202200347|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200347|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "3a5df68cca3ee6fd", "measure_id": "202200347", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to help maintain quality of life for residents; retain local small businesses, jobs; address homelessness; maintain wildfire prevention; keep public areas/ Downtown Paso Robles safe/clean; upgrade infrastructure; other general services, by increasing the transient occupancy tax (paid by hotel, motel, shortterm rental guests) from 10% to 11%, providing $750,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, all funds for Paso Robles, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6250, "no_votes": 4356, "total_votes": 10606, "percent_yes": 58.92890816518952, "percent_no": 41.07109183481048, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel, motel, and ...", "summary_text": "This measure increases the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel, motel, and short-term rental guests in Paso Robles from 10% to 11%, generating approximately $750,000 annually for general city services. The tax revenue would fund various municipal services including homelessness programs, wildfire prevention, public safety, infrastructure upgrades, and support for local businesses.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.250152", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.740166", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2625, "fingerprint": "2022|202200362|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200362|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5586020f71299282", "measure_id": "202200362", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure AA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Without increasing local taxes, shall the City of South San Francisco be authorized to develop, construct, and/or acquire affordable, decent, and safe rental housing for low-income persons, including families, seniors, people with disabilities, and veterans, in an amount up to 1% of the total number of existing housing units in the City of South San Francisco annually for an eight (8) year period, with any year's unused units being carried over each year?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10239, "no_votes": 7160, "total_votes": 17399, "percent_yes": 58.84820966722225, "percent_no": 41.15179033277775, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of South San Francisco to develop, construct...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of South San Francisco to develop, construct, and/or acquire affordable rental housing for low-income residents up to 1% of the city's total existing housing units annually for eight years, with unused allocations carrying over to subsequent years. The measure specifies that this would be accomplished without increasing local taxes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.258133", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.744259", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure AA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2622, "fingerprint": "2022|202200360|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200360|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b054cb2048f1f5d2", "measure_id": "202200360", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City of San Bruno Municipal Code to limit service on the City Council to consecutive terms of no more than 12 consecutive years or as Mayor to consecutive terms of no more than 12 consecutive years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10292, "no_votes": 1898, "total_votes": 12190, "percent_yes": 84.4298605414274, "percent_no": 15.570139458572598, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends San Bruno's Municipal Code to limit City Council members a...", "summary_text": "The measure amends San Bruno's Municipal Code to limit City Council members and the Mayor to no more than 12 consecutive years of service in their respective positions. It establishes term limits for both offices within the city government.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.257289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.743817", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2604, "fingerprint": "2022|202200518|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200518|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5657dee167b83457", "measure_id": "202200518", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect core academic programs in a science, technology, engineering, art, music, and math for elementary school students, restore accelerated math programs, keep libraries open, and retain highly-qualified teachers, shall the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District's measure be adopted renewing its existing $292 annual parcel taxes, providing $3,500,000 annually for ten years, with independent oversight, annual adjustments, senior exemptions, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds staying in local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8881, "no_votes": 2953, "total_votes": 11834, "percent_yes": 75.04647625485889, "percent_no": 24.953523745141112, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing $292 annual parcel tax in the Belmont-Redwoo...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing $292 annual parcel tax in the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District to provide $3.5 million annually for ten years to fund academic programs, libraries, and teacher retention. The measure included provisions for independent oversight, senior exemptions, and restrictions on using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.252080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.741082", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2623, "fingerprint": "2022|202200361|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200361|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "87bc04b5a857713e", "measure_id": "202200361", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund essential local general services in the City of San Mateo, such as street repairs, parks, recreation, fire protection, emergency response, and crime prevention; and improving intersections, sidewalks, and bike lanes for safety and reduced traffic congestion; shall the measure, increasing the City of San Mateo's existing transfer tax on property sales of $10 million or more, from 0.5% to 1.5%, generating approximately $4.8 million annually, until ended by voters, with independent audits and all money locally controlled, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23454, "no_votes": 9227, "total_votes": 32681, "percent_yes": 71.76646981426516, "percent_no": 28.233530185734836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases San Mateo's existing transfer tax on property sales of ...", "summary_text": "The measure increases San Mateo's existing transfer tax on property sales of $10 million or more from 0.5% to 1.5%, generating approximately $4.8 million annually. The revenue would fund general city services including street repairs, parks, recreation, fire protection, emergency response, crime prevention, and infrastructure improvements to intersections, sidewalks, and bike lanes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.257557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.743962", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2626, "fingerprint": "2022|202200363|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200363|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "362d155cfdce9efa", "measure_id": "202200363", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure DD", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure imposing an annual tax on parcels of land in South San Francisco that are developed and used as commercial office parcels, as defined in the measure, and 25,000 square feet or larger, at a rate of $2.50 per square foot of parcel size, generating approximately $55,900,000 annually, not expiring automatically, to fund early learning and care for children (primarily aged 2.5 to 5) of families living or working in the South San Francisco Unified School District boundaries be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8247, "no_votes": 9212, "total_votes": 17459, "percent_yes": 47.2363823815797, "percent_no": 52.7636176184203, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Social/Welfare", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.258398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.744409", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure DD", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2616, "fingerprint": "2022|202200522|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200522|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "28aab31e6be89828", "measure_id": "202200522", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of schools by constructing classrooms/updating science, technology, engineering/math labs; rebuilding an aging elementary school; updating schools to improve student health, safety and access for students with disabilities; and updating fire, HVAC/plumbing systems, shall Millbrae Elementary School District's measure authorizing $90,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, $6,300,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, and funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2939, "no_votes": 2546, "total_votes": 5485, "percent_yes": 53.58249772105743, "percent_no": 46.41750227894257, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Millbrae Elementary School District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Millbrae Elementary School District to issue $90 million in bonds to fund school construction and improvements, including rebuilding an elementary school, updating STEM labs, and improving safety and accessibility features. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.255552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.742905", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2607, "fingerprint": "2022|202200519|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200519|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2f215a187bebb928", "measure_id": "202200519", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide teachers/instructional aides for art, music, and reading, shall Brisbane School District measure authorizing renewal of the existing local school parcel tax, at the current rate of $131 per year,for six years, commencing July 1, 2022, exempting seniors, and increasing the District's appropriations limit in the amount of the funds raised by the special tax (estimated at $450,000 annually), be adopted, with funds spent exclusively on schools within Brisbane School District and not used/or other purposes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1543, "no_votes": 564, "total_votes": 2107, "percent_yes": 73.23208353108686, "percent_no": 26.767916468913143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an existing parcel tax of $131 per year for six years to ...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an existing parcel tax of $131 per year for six years to fund teachers and instructional aides for art, music, and reading programs in Brisbane School District. The tax exempts seniors and is estimated to raise $450,000 annually for use exclusively within the district's schools.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.252995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.741540", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2611, "fingerprint": "2022|202200520|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200520|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "84968deb077051c1", "measure_id": "202200520", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade aging school facilities and classrooms for science, technology, engineering, arts and math instruction; repair/ replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, heating/ cooling and ventilation systems; upgrade schools to meet current earthquake/ fire standards, and replace outdated portables with permanent classrooms, shall Hillsborough City School District's measure to issue $140,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, raising $6,600,000 annually averaging 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight and audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2213, "no_votes": 1389, "total_votes": 3602, "percent_yes": 61.438089950027766, "percent_no": 38.561910049972234, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Hillsborough City School District to issue $140 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Hillsborough City School District to issue $140 million in bonds to fund facility upgrades including science and technology classrooms, infrastructure repairs, safety improvements, and replacement of portable classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising approximately $6.6 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.254126", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.742144", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2618, "fingerprint": "2022|202200523|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200523|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "174d89a49956c073", "measure_id": "202200523", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue improving Ravenswood schools, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; upgrade safety, technology, and energy efficiency; and provide the local match for State facilities funds; shall Ravenswood City School District's measure authorizing $110 million in bonds, at legal rates with projected levies of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising an estimated average $6.3 million annually for approximately 32 years, and requiring audits, oversight, all funds to be spent locally AND no money for salaries, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1712, "no_votes": 670, "total_votes": 2382, "percent_yes": 71.87237615449203, "percent_no": 28.12762384550797, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Ravenswood City School District to issue $110 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Ravenswood City School District to issue $110 million in bonds to replace portable classrooms with permanent facilities, upgrade safety and technology systems, and provide local matching funds for state facilities funding. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value over about 32 years.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.256102", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.743217", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2612, "fingerprint": "2022|202200521|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200521|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ec344fa70ba67e7e", "measure_id": "202200521", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve student safety and campus security systems and fencing, repair and upgrade aging classrooms and facilities, shall Jefferson Elementary School District's measure authorizing $45,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.57 cents/$100 assessed value, $3,275,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, acquiring, constructing, and repairing classrooms, facilities and equipment, roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, be adopted, with oversight, all funds to be spent locally AND no money for salaries, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7530, "no_votes": 4518, "total_votes": 12048, "percent_yes": 62.5, "percent_no": 37.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Jefferson Elementary School District to issue $45 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Jefferson Elementary School District to issue $45 million in bonds to repair and upgrade aging classrooms, improve safety systems and campus security, and fix infrastructure including roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 1.57 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $3.275 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.254412", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.742304", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2603, "fingerprint": "2022|202200349|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200349|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f998d237491ad390", "measure_id": "202200349", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a City of Belmont ordinance providing funding, that cannot be taken by the State, for general city services including: Fixing potholes, repairing streets and sidewalks; Maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response times; Keeping infrastructure projects/ upgrades on-time/ on-budget; Maintaining senior services, and Keeping public areas healthy, safe and clean; by raising the transient occupancy (\"hotel\") tax to 14%, paid only by guests, until ended by voters, providing an additional $600,000 annually, with independent audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8352, "no_votes": 2180, "total_votes": 10532, "percent_yes": 79.30117736422332, "percent_no": 20.69882263577668, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure raised Belmont's transient occupancy tax on hotel guests to 14% ...", "summary_text": "This measure raised Belmont's transient occupancy tax on hotel guests to 14% to generate approximately $600,000 annually for general city services including street repairs, emergency response, infrastructure projects, and senior services. The tax increase was approved by voters and will remain in effect until ended by future voter action.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.251739", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.740933", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2610, "fingerprint": "2022|202200354|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200354|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b251eb8d6ede3274", "measure_id": "202200354", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund general government uses, such as programs for affordable housing, providing tenant rental support, and protecting local residents from displacement and homelessness, shall the current City of East Palo Alto business tax of 1.5% of gross receipts on landlords with five or more residential rental units, which cannot be passed to tenants, be set at 2.5% of gross receipts for all residential rental units, until terminated by voters or reduced by Council, raising approximately $1,480,000 annually, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2692, "no_votes": 1158, "total_votes": 3850, "percent_yes": 69.92207792207792, "percent_no": 30.077922077922082, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased East Palo Alto's business tax on landlords from 1", "summary_text": "This measure increased East Palo Alto's business tax on landlords from 1.5% to 2.5% of gross receipts and expanded it to apply to all residential rental units rather than just those with five or more units. The tax cannot be passed on to tenants and is expected to raise approximately $1,480,000 annually for general government uses including affordable housing programs and tenant support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.253850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.741996", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2602, "fingerprint": "2022|202200524|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200524|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "89e3a52ea98291c7", "measure_id": "202200524", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve quality education that cannot be taken by the State; maintain competitive science, math, reading and writing; attract and retain quality teachers; and integrate modern technology for future student success; shall Bayshore Elementary School District's measure renewing the parcel tax of $96 per parcel for eight years with annual adjustments described in the voter guide, raising approximately $160,000 per year, with senior and disability exemptions and no money for administrator salaries, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 771, "no_votes": 337, "total_votes": 1108, "percent_yes": 69.58483754512635, "percent_no": 30.415162454873652, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing $96 annual parcel tax in the Bayshore Elemen...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing $96 annual parcel tax in the Bayshore Elementary School District for eight years to raise approximately $160,000 per year for educational programs and technology. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and disabled residents and prohibits using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.251340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.740785", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2615, "fingerprint": "2022|202200356|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200356|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a6ef0790f296ebcc", "measure_id": "202200356", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue funding, for the City of Millbrae only, that cannot be taken by Sacramento, for general city services such as: repairing potholes/streets; maintaining neighborhood/downtown police patrols; improving recreation programs/parks; attracting new businesses; and enhancing disaster response; shall a measure increasing by 2% the City of Millbrae's existing transient occupancy tax charged to hotel and lodging guests until ended by voters, providing an additional $1,500,000 annually, with citizens' oversight, independent audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5987, "no_votes": 1609, "total_votes": 7596, "percent_yes": 78.81779884149552, "percent_no": 21.182201158504483, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases San Mateo's transient occupancy tax by 2% on hotel and ...", "summary_text": "The measure increases San Mateo's transient occupancy tax by 2% on hotel and lodging guests to generate approximately $1.5 million annually for general city services including street repairs, police patrols, parks, business attraction, and disaster response. The tax increase will remain in effect until ended by voters and includes provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.255252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.742752", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2605, "fingerprint": "2022|202200350|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200350|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "67dd64a6bdf5f79f", "measure_id": "202200350", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall an ordinance be adopted imposing on hotels and other places designed for overnight stays by guests a business license tax of $2.50 per room for each day such room is rented, generating approximately $250,000 annually until ended by the voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1222, "no_votes": 543, "total_votes": 1765, "percent_yes": 69.23512747875354, "percent_no": 30.76487252124646, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a $2", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a $2.50 per room per night business license tax on hotels and other overnight accommodations in San Mateo to fund general municipal expenses. The tax was expected to generate approximately $250,000 annually and would remain in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.252348", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.741231", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2619, "fingerprint": "2022|202200358|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200358|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0bf60982e86ae18f", "measure_id": "202200358", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the Redwood City Charter to shorten the term of Mayor from two years to one year in order to allow more Councilmembers to serve as Mayor during their tenure on City Council, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8605, "no_votes": 15012, "total_votes": 23617, "percent_yes": 36.435618410467036, "percent_no": 63.564381589532964, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the Redwood City Charter to reduce the mayor'...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the Redwood City Charter to reduce the mayor's term from two years to one year, allowing more council members the opportunity to serve as mayor during their time on the city council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.256402", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.743367", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2617, "fingerprint": "2022|202200357|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200357|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7cdd667d8f96da31", "measure_id": "202200357", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Pacifica amend its municipal code to prohibit the ignition, use, discharge, or sale, of all State-approved \"Safe and Sane\" fireworks in the City of Pacifica?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6747, "no_votes": 9015, "total_votes": 15762, "percent_yes": 42.805481537875906, "percent_no": 57.194518462124094, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.255821", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.743067", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2613, "fingerprint": "2022|202200525|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200525|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "cd5f1e5314f294c4", "measure_id": "202200525", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve educational facilities supporting an expanded course of study; repair deteriorating infrastructure and modernize school facilities at district schools, shall the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, levying approximately $.06 per $100 of assessed valuation (raising $1,000,000 annually), with a robust community engagement process, board appointed citizens' oversight, and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 836, "no_votes": 492, "total_votes": 1328, "percent_yes": 62.951807228915655, "percent_no": 37.048192771084345, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District to issue $15 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities and infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed property value, generating about $1 million annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.254704", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.742452", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2621, "fingerprint": "2022|202200526|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200526|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e19339261878bdac", "measure_id": "202200526", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local elementary and middle schools by repainng and upgrading science, technology, engineering, arts and math classrooms/labs; making safety/security improvements; upgrading inadequate heating, cooling, electrical systems; constructing and acquiring sites/facilities, shall Redwood City Elementary School District's measure authorizing $298 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $24 per $100,000 of assessed value ($16 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17895, "no_votes": 11721, "total_votes": 29616, "percent_yes": 60.423419773095624, "percent_no": 39.576580226904376, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Redwood City Elementary School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Redwood City Elementary School District to issue $298 million in bonds to repair and upgrade science, technology, engineering, arts and math classrooms, improve safety and security systems, and upgrade heating, cooling and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $24 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.256994", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.743669", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2627, "fingerprint": "2022|202200528|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200528|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0c663bf138dc861e", "measure_id": "202200528", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; make health, safety and security improvements, equip schools with 21st century learning technology, and construct local affordable rental housing for teachers and staff, shall South San Francisco Unified School District measure authorizing $436.0 million in bonds, at legal rates, be adopted levying an estimated 6 cents per $100 of assessed value generating on average $27 million annually while bonds are outstanding, with a citizens ' oversight committee and independent audits on all bond money?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13633, "no_votes": 7802, "total_votes": 21435, "percent_yes": 63.60158619080942, "percent_no": 36.39841380919058, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the South San Francisco Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the South San Francisco Unified School District to issue $436 million in bonds to modernize school facilities, improve health and safety systems, upgrade technology, and construct affordable rental housing for teachers and staff. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes estimated at 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $27 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.258678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.744559", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2606, "fingerprint": "2022|202200351|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200351|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0e590abf7d88eaed", "measure_id": "202200351", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Brisbane's measure to fund city services/facilities, such as neighborhood police patrols, fire prevention services, urban wildfire protection, crime suppression/investigation, pothole/street repair, parks and other city facilities, and to support other city services, by levying a \u00bd\u00a2 sales tax, generating approximately $2,000,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1080, "no_votes": 609, "total_votes": 1689, "percent_yes": 63.94316163410302, "percent_no": 36.05683836589698, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levied a 0", "summary_text": "This measure levied a 0.5-cent sales tax in Brisbane, California to fund various city services including police patrols, fire prevention, street repairs, and parks maintenance. The tax generates approximately $2 million annually and continues until voters decide to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.252644", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.741378", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2614, "fingerprint": "2022|202200355|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200355|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "450023a04bbd8053", "measure_id": "202200355", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, which prohibits the City Council of the City of Menlo Park from re-zoning or re-designating certain properties that were zoned and designated for single family detached homes as of April 15, 2022, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4852, "no_votes": 7860, "total_votes": 12712, "percent_yes": 38.1686595342983, "percent_no": 61.8313404657017, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.254971", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.742605", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2624, "fingerprint": "2022|202200527|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200527|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "90f32c409be00811", "measure_id": "202200527", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade aging local high schools by fixing deteriorating plumbing, heating, ventilation, and electrical systems and modernizing/expanding science, technology, math, skilled trades, arts and engineering classrooms, labs and facilities that support student achievement and college/career readiness, shall Sequoia Union High School District's measure be adopted to authorize $591,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $14 per $100,000 of assessed value ($30.4 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight and all money locally-controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53317, "no_votes": 31340, "total_votes": 84657, "percent_yes": 62.98002527847668, "percent_no": 37.01997472152332, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Sequoia Union High School District to issue $591", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Sequoia Union High School District to issue $591.5 million in bonds to repair and upgrade aging high school infrastructure, including plumbing, heating, electrical systems, and modernizing classrooms and labs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $14 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.257839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.744112", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2608, "fingerprint": "2022|202200352|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200352|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "19ee240d894cc066", "measure_id": "202200352", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support city services such as fixing streets/sidewalks; enhancing police patrols/crime prevention; undergrounding power lines; and for general government use, shall an ordinance be adopted updating Burlingame's business licensing, last increased in 1993, with rates ranging from $200 to $750, with the highest rate on larger businesses, and 5% of gross receipts for non-storefront marijuana businesses, providing approximately $2,500,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits and all funds staying in Burlingame?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8467, "no_votes": 2816, "total_votes": 11283, "percent_yes": 75.04209873260658, "percent_no": 24.957901267393424, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure updates Burlingame's business licensing fees to rates ranging fr...", "summary_text": "This measure updates Burlingame's business licensing fees to rates ranging from $200 to $750 based on business size, plus 5% of gross receipts for non-storefront marijuana businesses, generating approximately $2.5 million annually for city services. The revenue would fund street and sidewalk repairs, police patrols, power line undergrounding, and general government operations, with required audits and voter oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.253262", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.741689", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2609, "fingerprint": "2022|202200353|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200353|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b17147ff52148fb5", "measure_id": "202200353", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure establishing a \u00bd \u00a2 sales tax for general government use to maintain the City of Pacifica's vital services, such as police, fire, medical 9-1-1 emergency response; keeping pollution/trash off beaches; attracting/retaining jobs/businesses; street paving; storm drain maintenance to prevent flooding; preventing coastal erosion, and generating approximately $2,600,000 annually for 9 years, with regular financial audits, independent citizens' oversight, and requiring funds be used locally, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9577, "no_votes": 6554, "total_votes": 16131, "percent_yes": 59.37015684086542, "percent_no": 40.62984315913458, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.5 cent sales tax in Pacifica for general government services, generating approximately $2.6 million annually for 9 years. The tax revenue would fund various city services including police, fire, emergency response, beach maintenance, street paving, storm drain maintenance, and coastal erosion prevention, with financial audits and citizen oversight required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.253552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.741839", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2620, "fingerprint": "2022|202200359|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200359|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "531beaf361c2fbd5", "measure_id": "202200359", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure amending the Redwood City Charter to align the date of the Redwood City General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election date, clarify the date by which Redwood City elections must be certified and City Councilmembers sworn in, and provide for election of City Councilmembers by-district in order to comply with State law, be adopted?\u00a0", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20016, "no_votes": 3094, "total_votes": 23110, "percent_yes": 86.61185633924708, "percent_no": 13.388143660752917, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Redwood City Charter to move the city's general muni...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Redwood City Charter to move the city's general municipal election to align with the statewide general election date, clarify certification and swearing-in timelines, and establish by-district elections for City Council members to comply with state law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.256672", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.743514", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2638, "fingerprint": "2022|202200534|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200534|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "f9cdad5252b9af51", "measure_id": "202200534", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct and modernize classrooms and vocational and career training facilities, upgrade science labs, replace portable classrooms, make safety and security improvements at all sites, improve student support facilities and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Lompoc Unified School District measure issue $125,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising on average approximately $6,400,000 annually, with levies projected at 6 cents/$100 of assessed valuation, an oversight committee, audits, and no money for administrator salaries, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7683, "no_votes": 6424, "total_votes": 14107, "percent_yes": 54.46232366910044, "percent_no": 45.53767633089956, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Lompoc Unified School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Lompoc Unified School District to issue $125 million in bonds to construct and modernize classrooms, upgrade science labs, replace portable classrooms, make safety improvements, and provide matching funds for state grants. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies projected at 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.261907", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.746313", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2631, "fingerprint": "2022|202200365|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200365|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "03911a844db2ff34", "measure_id": "202200365", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support Goleta's 9-1-1 response/crime prevention; cleanup trash in creeks to maintain coastal waters; address homelessness, fire risks from illegal encampments; maintain public safety, clean/maintain public areas; repair streets/potholes; increase recycled water use for parks; retain local businesses/jobs; maintain open spaces/natural areas and for general government use; shall a measure be adopted establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $10,600,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7870, "no_votes": 4353, "total_votes": 12223, "percent_yes": 64.38681174834329, "percent_no": 35.61318825165671, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Goleta to fund various city se...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Goleta to fund various city services including emergency response, homeless services, street repairs, environmental cleanup, and general government operations, generating approximately $10.6 million annually. The tax continues until voters choose to end it and requires public disclosure of spending.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.259878", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.745153", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2632, "fingerprint": "2022|202200366|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200366|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "de90c04522655c62", "measure_id": "202200366", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 21-09, An Ordinance of the City of Goleta, California, banning the sale of flavored tobacco products within the City's limits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9268, "no_votes": 2958, "total_votes": 12226, "percent_yes": 75.80566006870603, "percent_no": 24.194339931293968, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products within the city...", "summary_text": "The ordinance would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products within the city limits of Goleta, California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.260144", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.745309", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2628, "fingerprint": "2022|202200529|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200529|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "a9b274cba388ffea", "measure_id": "202200529", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade, modernize, and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; and upgrade inadequate HVAC systems; shall Buellton Union School District issue $8,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $731,600 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 2.6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1626, "no_votes": 1034, "total_votes": 2660, "percent_yes": 61.127819548872175, "percent_no": 38.872180451127825, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Buellton Union School District to issue $8", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Buellton Union School District to issue $8.8 million in bonds to upgrade and modernize school facilities, including classrooms, restrooms, roofs, and HVAC systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 2.6 cents per $100 of assessed value and include oversight provisions prohibiting funds from being used for salaries or taken by the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.258974", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.744707", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2636, "fingerprint": "2022|202200533|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200533|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "7e9f642b37acd6d0", "measure_id": "202200533", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support academic excellence and provide local reliable funding for local schools that cannot be taken by the State, with no proceeds used for administrators' salaries, benefits and pensions, the Hope Elementary School District (\"District\") proposes to extend, without increasing the tax rate, its existing high quality education parcel tax for a period of five (5), starting on July 1, 2023, at a rate of $79 per parcel per year, with an exemption available for senior citizens and certain disabled persons, and to implement accountability measures, including citizen oversight, to ensure the funds are used to help.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5153, "no_votes": 1621, "total_votes": 6774, "percent_yes": 76.07026867434308, "percent_no": 23.929731325656917, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure extends the Hope Elementary School District's existing $79 per ye...", "summary_text": "The measure extends the Hope Elementary School District's existing $79 per year parcel tax for five years starting July 1, 2023, without increasing the current tax rate. The funds are designated for local school funding with restrictions preventing their use for administrator compensation and include exemptions for senior citizens and certain disabled persons.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.261289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.745925", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2629, "fingerprint": "2022|202200364|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200364|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "51409bb373f48557", "measure_id": "202200364", "measure_letter": "T2022", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure T2022", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Measure to Change and/or Readopt the City of Carpenteria's General Plan Designation and Zoning Designation for Two Parcels of City-Owned Property (APN 004-105-011 and APN 004-105-026) Located Adjacent to the Railroad Tracks to the West of Linden Avenue and to Amend the Definition of the Open Space/Recreation (OSR) Land Use Category of the General Plan Land Use Element be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2490, "no_votes": 2573, "total_votes": 5063, "percent_yes": 49.18032786885246, "percent_no": 50.81967213114754, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.259292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.744857", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure T2022", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2639, "fingerprint": "2022|202200369|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200369|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "2abd7f5be8b2814e", "measure_id": "202200369", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect and maintain funding for City of Solvang services, such as: pothole and street repair, flammable brush removal, 911 emergency response, neighborhood police patrols, recreation programs and general government use shall the City of Solvang adopt a measure establishing a local 1\u00a2 sales tax, until ended by voters, providing $1.6 million dollars annually that cannot be taken by the State, with independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrative overhead?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1635, "no_votes": 963, "total_votes": 2598, "percent_yes": 62.933025404157036, "percent_no": 37.066974595842964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a 1-cent local sales tax in Solvang to fund city serv...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a 1-cent local sales tax in Solvang to fund city services including street repair, emergency response, police patrols, and recreation programs, generating approximately $1.6 million annually. The tax continues until voters decide to end it and includes provisions for citizen oversight and restrictions on administrative overhead spending.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.262232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.746465", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2634, "fingerprint": "2022|202200531|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200531|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "55429a9e5ab4ae24", "measure_id": "202200531", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; construct a new junior high school with a community gymnasium; build classrooms and science labs; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements, shall Guadalupe Elementary School District's measure be adopted to issue $8,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $439,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all funds spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 866, "no_votes": 373, "total_votes": 1239, "percent_yes": 69.8950766747377, "percent_no": 30.104923325262305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Guadalupe Elementary School District to issue $8", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Guadalupe Elementary School District to issue $8.5 million in bonds to construct a new junior high school with community gymnasium, build classrooms and science labs, and make health, safety and accessibility improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $439,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.260725", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.745608", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2635, "fingerprint": "2022|202200532|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200532|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "551392cb54b5e594", "measure_id": "202200532", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; construct, upgrade, and modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace roofs; make health/safety improvements; renovate/replace plumbing and HVAC systems, shall Guadalupe Elementary School District's measure be adopted to issue $8,490,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $438,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 2.95\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all funds spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 842, "no_votes": 394, "total_votes": 1236, "percent_yes": 68.12297734627832, "percent_no": 31.87702265372168, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Guadalupe Elementary School District to issue $8", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Guadalupe Elementary School District to issue $8.49 million in bonds to construct, upgrade, and modernize school facilities including classrooms, restrooms, roofs, plumbing, and HVAC systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 2.95 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $438,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.261003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.745766", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2637, "fingerprint": "2022|202200368|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200368|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "6d934715a8f27f5d", "measure_id": "202200368", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, imposing a 1% special transient occupancy tax paid by hotel guests, with 65% of revenues to be used for Lompoc police purposes and 35% of revenues to be used for Lompoc fire protection purposes, and permitting hotel operators to retain 2% of all collected transient occupancy taxes to cover collection costs, which will raise approximately $180,000 annually in transient occupancy tax revenues, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5586, "no_votes": 3465, "total_votes": 9051, "percent_yes": 61.7169373549884, "percent_no": 38.2830626450116, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a 1% special transient occupancy tax on hotel...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a 1% special transient occupancy tax on hotel guests in Lompoc, with 65% of the estimated $180,000 in annual revenue going to police services and 35% to fire protection services. Hotel operators would have been allowed to retain 2% of collected taxes to cover collection costs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.261581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.746158", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2630, "fingerprint": "2022|202200530|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200530|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "496e21e9a05e7362", "measure_id": "202200530", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair aging classrooms/school facilities to meet health and safety codes; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical; remove asbestos/lead pipes; and upgrade, construct and equip classrooms, labs, facilities to support student achievement in science, math, technology, engineering, and arts; shall the College School District measure authorizing $23,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($1 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1487, "no_votes": 1362, "total_votes": 2849, "percent_yes": 52.193752193752196, "percent_no": 47.806247806247804, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.259578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.745006", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2633, "fingerprint": "2022|202200367|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200367|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "86eadfd9385dd032", "measure_id": "202200367", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA BARBARA Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure be adopted to increase the City of Guadalupe's Transient Occupancy Tax from 6% to 10% until repealed by city voters, and to add short-term rentals of any type, RV Parks, and campgrounds as lodgings subject to the tax, which is anticipated to raise $20,000 annually, and more if additional lodging facilities commence operations in the City?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 583, "no_votes": 646, "total_votes": 1229, "percent_yes": 47.43694060211554, "percent_no": 52.56305939788446, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased the City of Guadalupe's transient occupancy...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased the City of Guadalupe's transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10% and expanded it to include short-term rentals, RV parks, and campgrounds. The city estimated the change would generate approximately $20,000 annually in additional revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.260425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.745458", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA BARBARA Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2651, "fingerprint": "2022|202200375|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200375|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4394480c19af6301", "measure_id": "202200375", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance, changing zoning regulations throughout the City of Morgan Hill to prohibit buildings with characteristics that could be used for new storage and distribution uses in all areas of the City be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11279, "no_votes": 4187, "total_votes": 15466, "percent_yes": 72.92771240139662, "percent_no": 27.07228759860338, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance changes zoning regulations throughout Morgan Hill to prohibit b...", "summary_text": "The ordinance changes zoning regulations throughout Morgan Hill to prohibit buildings with characteristics that could be used for new storage and distribution facilities in all areas of the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.265885", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.748341", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11071, "fingerprint": "2022|202200370|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200370|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "261e3ba4674498d8", "measure_id": "202200370", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To increase voter participation, shall the City Charter be amended to: (1) move the election for the Office of Mayor to the same year as presidential elections beginning in 2024, and (2) limit the person elected to the Office of Mayor in 2022 to a two-year term with the option to run for and serve as Mayor for two additional successive four-year terms?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91162, "no_votes": 73147, "total_votes": 164309, "percent_yes": 55.48204906608889, "percent_no": 44.51795093391111, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure moved Santa Clara's mayoral elections to coincide with president...", "summary_text": "This measure moved Santa Clara's mayoral elections to coincide with presidential election years starting in 2024 and limited the 2022 mayor to a two-year term, after which mayors could serve up to two additional successive four-year terms.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.318480", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.268066", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.749537", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2652, "fingerprint": "2022|202200376|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200376|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a88d26f3931cdcf9", "measure_id": "202200376", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure, amending the City's General Plan to require voter approval of any future Monterey Road lane reduction be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11768, "no_votes": 3836, "total_votes": 15604, "percent_yes": 75.41655985644707, "percent_no": 24.583440143552934, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Santa Clara's General Plan to require voter approval befo...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Santa Clara's General Plan to require voter approval before the city can reduce the number of lanes on Monterey Road in the future.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.266181", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.748498", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2657, "fingerprint": "2022|202200382|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200382|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b1d57db7aedf3019", "measure_id": "202200382", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Saratoga adopt an ordinance establishing term limits for members of the Saratoga City Council, limiting individuals to serving two terms and specifying the duration of various types of partial terms that are considered a term for the purposes of term limits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10357, "no_votes": 3142, "total_votes": 13499, "percent_yes": 76.72420179272538, "percent_no": 23.27579820727462, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes term limits for Saratoga City Council members, restr...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes term limits for Saratoga City Council members, restricting individuals to serving two terms and defining how partial terms count toward the term limit.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.269497", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.750298", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11072, "fingerprint": "2022|202200371|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200371|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c98210cae2b882a6", "measure_id": "202200371", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to elect city council members by district, excepting the mayor, to establish six districts for the election of one council member to represent each district; and to establish a 30-day residency requirement for all elected officials?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14172, "no_votes": 3835, "total_votes": 18007, "percent_yes": 78.70272671738768, "percent_no": 21.297273282612323, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment changes Santa Clara's city council elections from at-l...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment changes Santa Clara's city council elections from at-large to a district-based system with six districts, each electing one council member, while keeping the mayor elected citywide, and establishes a 30-day residency requirement for all elected officials.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.318997", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.268381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.749701", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2646, "fingerprint": "2022|202200372|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200372|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "12b103a6358e4cca", "measure_id": "202200372", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Gilroy Charter be amended to: \u2022 Modify the bidding threshold from $35,000 to the amount authorized by California Public Contract Code Section 22032; \u2022 Establish authority to procure for Design-Build and Best Value contracts; \u2022 Allow modernization of public noticing?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9885, "no_votes": 3845, "total_votes": 13730, "percent_yes": 71.99563000728332, "percent_no": 28.004369992716676, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Contracting/Bidding/Leasing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment modified Gilroy's bidding threshold from $35,000 to ma...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment modified Gilroy's bidding threshold from $35,000 to match California Public Contract Code Section 22032, established authority for Design-Build and Best Value contracting methods, and allowed modernization of public noticing requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.264430", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.747563", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11070, "fingerprint": "2022|202200545|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200545|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "713324cb6850fe88", "measure_id": "202200545", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To expand vocational career and technical education facilities; increase labs and training sites to prepare students for college and future jobs; and build new classrooms to relieve overcrowding; shall Patterson Joint Unified School District\u2019s bond authorizing $74 million be approved with legal rates, projected levies below $57/ $100,000 of assessed valuation (generating $3.9 million/ year while bonds are outstanding), annual audits, independent oversight and all funds spent locally with no money taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13, "no_votes": 22, "total_votes": 35, "percent_yes": 37.142857142857146, "percent_no": 62.857142857142854, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Patterson Joint Unified School Distric...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Patterson Joint Unified School District to issue $74 million in bonds to expand vocational and technical education facilities, increase labs and training sites, and build new classrooms to address overcrowding. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies projected at below $57 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.318293", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.267722", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.749329", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2650, "fingerprint": "2022|202200537|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200537|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "283ee9dff089671c", "measure_id": "202200537", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renew, without increasing, expiring local school funding that cannot be taken by the State; maintain core academic programs in science, technology, engineering, arts, athletics and math; attract/retain highly qualified educators, and prepare students for college and the workforce, shall Milpitas Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted renewing its existing $84 annual parcel tax, providing approximately $1,600,000 annually for eight years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting local students?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8086, "no_votes": 2760, "total_votes": 10846, "percent_yes": 74.55283053660335, "percent_no": 25.447169463396648, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing $84 annual parcel tax in the Milpitas Unifie...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing $84 annual parcel tax in the Milpitas Unified School District for eight years, generating approximately $1.6 million annually for academic programs and educator retention. The renewal maintained the current tax rate without any increase and included exemptions for seniors and restrictions on using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.265589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.748180", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2649, "fingerprint": "2022|202200374|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200374|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c8d482ced98f0944", "measure_id": "202200374", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the Milpitas Municipal Code to shorten Councilmember terms limits by establishing for both Councilmembers and Mayor, effective with the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election, a ten consecutive year limit on combined Mayoral and City Councilmember service, with a six year limit on Mayoral service, followed by a two-year \"cooling off\u201d period, during which a person may not serve as Mayor or a Councilmember?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12786, "no_votes": 3465, "total_votes": 16251, "percent_yes": 78.67823518552704, "percent_no": 21.321764814472957, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would limit combined mayoral and city council service in Milpitas...", "summary_text": "The measure would limit combined mayoral and city council service in Milpitas to 10 consecutive years, with a maximum of 6 years as mayor, followed by a mandatory 2-year break from holding either office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.265307", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.748020", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11074, "fingerprint": "2022|202200380|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200380|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e482625fe0c206bb", "measure_id": "202200380", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect essential services without raising taxes, such as 9-1-1 response; police patrols, fire protection; street/storm drain repair, and maintaining reliable local utility service; shall Section 1320 of the Charter continuing the annual budget transfer of funds from City utilities to the general fund at 5% of gross receipts until ended by voters, generating approximately $30,000,000 annually, with independent audits, all funds local, be reaffirmed/adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24643, "no_votes": 4629, "total_votes": 29272, "percent_yes": 84.18625307461055, "percent_no": 15.813746925389452, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure continues an annual transfer of 5% of gross receipts from city ut...", "summary_text": "The measure continues an annual transfer of 5% of gross receipts from city utilities to Santa Clara's general fund, generating approximately $30 million per year for municipal services. The transfer will remain in effect until voters decide to end it in a future election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.319620", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.268964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.749997", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2645, "fingerprint": "2022|202200536|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200536|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c71b100f4e4623bb", "measure_id": "202200536", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, and facilities for technology, arts, math, and career technical education; improve ventilation systems; provide essential seismic safety and accessibility upgrades; and, construct and repair sites and facilities, shall the measure authorizing $275 million in Fremont Union High School District bonds at legal rates, raising an estimated $18.2 million annually until approximately 2052, at projected rates of 1.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizen's oversight and all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23550, "no_votes": 18725, "total_votes": 42275, "percent_yes": 55.706682436428146, "percent_no": 44.293317563571854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Fremont Union High School District to issue $275 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Fremont Union High School District to issue $275 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, science labs, technology and arts facilities, improve ventilation and seismic safety, and construct or repair school sites. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 1.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $18.2 million annually until around 2052.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.264114", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.747413", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11075, "fingerprint": "2022|202200381|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200381|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "64d276c18d81d188", "measure_id": "202200381", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect Santa Clara's financial stability and maintain essential services such as 911 emergency/public safety/crime reduction services, safe/clean public areas, pothole repair, parks/libraries, shall an ordinance to increase Santa Clara's 1992 business license tax on businesses to $45 per employee and on landlords to $15 per rental unit, generating approximately $6,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, with independent financial audits, all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17329, "no_votes": 11797, "total_votes": 29126, "percent_yes": 59.496669642244036, "percent_no": 40.503330357755964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases Santa Clara's business license tax to $45 per employee...", "summary_text": "This measure increases Santa Clara's business license tax to $45 per employee and $15 per rental unit for landlords, generating approximately $6 million annually for general city services. The tax increase remains in effect until voters decide to end it and includes provisions for independent financial audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.319818", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.269232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.750147", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2653, "fingerprint": "2022|202200538|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200538|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0b6eb68bf5c8b790", "measure_id": "202200538", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain strong core academic programs, including math and science, attract/retain qualified teachers, provide current educational materials, protect art, music, reading and writing programs/access to technology training, keep libraries open, shall Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District\u2019s measure renewing without increasing its expiring $95 annual parcel tax for seven years, be approved, raising $480,000 annually which cannot be taken by the State, with exemptions for seniors, audits, independent oversight, no funds for administrators?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2144, "no_votes": 984, "total_votes": 3128, "percent_yes": 68.54219948849105, "percent_no": 31.45780051150895, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing $95 annual parcel tax in the Mt", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing $95 annual parcel tax in the Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District for seven years without increasing the rate, raising approximately $480,000 annually for educational programs and services. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and prohibits funds from being used for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.266459", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.748679", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11073, "fingerprint": "2022|202200379|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200379|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "045a585f9107bfeb", "measure_id": "202200379", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to add the City's ethics and elections commission (Board of Fair Campaign and Political Practices) to the Charter; remove requirements that members of the Planning, Civil Service, and Salary Setting Commissions be electors and/or citizens; remove gender-specific language; and require the City Council to adopt equity values, standards, and assessments in making certain decisions?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 136560, "no_votes": 98766, "total_votes": 235326, "percent_yes": 58.030136916447816, "percent_no": 41.969863083552184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment added the ethics and elections commission to the city ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment added the ethics and elections commission to the city charter, removed citizenship and elector requirements for certain commission members, eliminated gender-specific language, and required the City Council to adopt equity values, standards, and assessments for certain decisions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.319339", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.268666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.749849", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2640, "fingerprint": "2022|202200535|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200535|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f033fa95a90bd9da", "measure_id": "202200535", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Without increasing current rates, to help protect schools from budget cuts, to continue improving local elementary/middle schools by protecting reading, writing, math, science, technology and arts/music, recruiting/retaining qualified teachers and counselors, extending student support, shall Alum Rock Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure renewing its existing $214.10 parcel tax for 7 years, adjusted annually, providing $4,500,000 yearly, be adopted, with senior exemptions, independent citizens oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit students?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8537, "no_votes": 3761, "total_votes": 12298, "percent_yes": 69.41779151081477, "percent_no": 30.582208489185234, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed the Alum Rock Union Elementary School District's existin...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed the Alum Rock Union Elementary School District's existing $214.10 parcel tax for 7 years to provide $4.5 million annually for elementary and middle school programs including core academics, arts, music, and staff retention. The measure included senior exemptions, citizen oversight requirements, and restrictions preventing funds from being used for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.262555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.746638", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2648, "fingerprint": "2022|202200373|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200373|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "63af1726829a31fe", "measure_id": "202200373", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to fund critical Town needs such as public safety by amending business license taxes, unchanged since 1991 while inflation increased 117% to increase flat taxes by 30% adjusted annually for inflation, Retailing gross receipts tax by 40%, and to add E-Commerce to the Manufacturing, Wholesaling, and Jobbing gross receipts tax schedule and increase that schedule by 120%, raising about $1,100,000 yearly for general fund purposes until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7034, "no_votes": 6170, "total_votes": 13204, "percent_yes": 53.271735837624966, "percent_no": 46.728264162375034, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases various business license taxes in Santa Clara, includin...", "summary_text": "The measure increases various business license taxes in Santa Clara, including a 30% increase in flat taxes, a 40% increase in retailing gross receipts tax, and a 120% increase in manufacturing/wholesaling/jobbing gross receipts tax while adding e-commerce businesses to that category. The changes are expected to generate approximately $1.1 million annually for the town's general fund.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.264995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.747871", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2655, "fingerprint": "2022|202200377|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200377|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "99d3c1f93144acff", "measure_id": "202200377", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to raise funds for public safety, affordable housing, rail crossing safety, homeless services, and general city services, by levying a tax on businesses in the City of Palo Alto at a monthly rate of 7.5 cents per square foot occupied by a business, up to $500,000 per business, with annual 2.5% adjustments for inflation and exemptions for grocery stores and businesses under 10,000 square feet, raising approximately $9.6 million annually for 35 years, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17311, "no_votes": 8525, "total_votes": 25836, "percent_yes": 67.00340610001548, "percent_no": 32.99659389998452, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies a monthly tax of 7", "summary_text": "This measure levies a monthly tax of 7.5 cents per square foot on businesses in Palo Alto, with a cap of $500,000 per business and exemptions for grocery stores and businesses under 10,000 square feet. The tax includes annual 2.5% inflation adjustments and is expected to generate approximately $9.6 million annually for 35 years to fund public safety, affordable housing, rail crossing safety, homeless services, and general city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.267109", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.749007", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2656, "fingerprint": "2022|202200378|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200378|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0df4eb1c9b0b3082", "measure_id": "202200378", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure affirming the City of Palo Alto\u2019s existing and decades-old practice of annually transferring no more than 18% of the gross revenues from the City\u2019s natural gas utility (generated by the City\u2019s retail natural gas rates) to its general fund to support general city services such as roads; parks; libraries; climate change reduction; police, fire, emergency medical, and 9-1-1 response; providing approximately $7 million annually in existing revenues until ended by voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19711, "no_votes": 5649, "total_votes": 25360, "percent_yes": 77.72476340694007, "percent_no": 22.27523659305993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would affirm the City of Palo Alto's existing practice of annual...", "summary_text": "This measure would affirm the City of Palo Alto's existing practice of annually transferring up to 18% of gross revenues from its natural gas utility to the general fund to support various city services. The transfer would provide approximately $7 million annually in existing revenues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.267419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.749159", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2647, "fingerprint": "2022|202200543|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200543|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0246423fc74d9cfa", "measure_id": "202200543", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide Loma Prieta neighborhood elementary/middle school students with stable funding for current instruction in math, science, reading, technology, arts and other core curriculum; retain/recruit highly qualified teachers, and continue to support classroom technology needs, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District's measure be approved establishing an annual parcel tax of $348 for 8 years, raising approximately $640,000 a year, with senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrator's salaries, all funds staying in our local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 344, "no_votes": 154, "total_votes": 498, "percent_yes": 69.07630522088354, "percent_no": 30.92369477911646, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established an annual $348 parcel tax for 8 years in the Loma Pr...", "summary_text": "This measure established an annual $348 parcel tax for 8 years in the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District to fund core curriculum instruction, teacher retention and recruitment, and classroom technology. The tax includes senior exemptions, citizen oversight, and restrictions preventing funds from being used for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.264708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.747721", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2644, "fingerprint": "2022|202200542|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200542|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5cc14e48f8f7e9a7", "measure_id": "202200542", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall East Side Union High School District's measure to expand career/ technical education facilities, renovate science labs and upgrade technology at Andrew Hill, Calero, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Yerba Buena and W.C. Overfelt High Schools be adopted, authorizing $572 million in bonds with legal rates, projected levies below 3\u00a2/$100 of assessed valuation ($35. 7 million/year through 2050), annual audits, independent oversight and no increase in tax rates?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78303, "no_votes": 39215, "total_votes": 117518, "percent_yes": 66.63064381626644, "percent_no": 33.36935618373356, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the East Side Union High School District to issue $57...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the East Side Union High School District to issue $572 million in bonds to expand career/technical education facilities, renovate science labs, and upgrade technology at 13 high schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies projected at below 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.263820", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.747255", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2643, "fingerprint": "2022|202200541|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200541|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1f2fca78e099c7aa", "measure_id": "202200541", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue funding academic/career-training programs in math, science, engineering, technology, arts and skilled trades that support college/career readiness; attract/retain qualified teachers/specialists; provide student mental health services and maintain manageable class sizes, shall the Campbell Union High School District measure renewing the expiring school parcel tax be adopted at the current rate of $85 per parcel (no increase), continuing $5,000,000 in annual school funding for 10 years, with senior exemptions and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51895, "no_votes": 16440, "total_votes": 68335, "percent_yes": 75.94205019389771, "percent_no": 24.057949806102286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an expiring $85 per parcel tax for the Campbell Union Hig...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an expiring $85 per parcel tax for the Campbell Union High School District to continue funding academic programs, teacher retention, student mental health services, and class size management for 10 years. The measure maintains the current tax rate without increase and provides approximately $5 million in annual local school funding with exemptions for seniors.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.263531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.747108", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2654, "fingerprint": "2022|202200544|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200544|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "733cb642b9fe8e10", "measure_id": "202200544", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize classrooms, increase student access to technology, upgrade science labs, make school safety and security improvements at all sites, improve support facilities, and provide a local match for State grants, shall Oak Grove School District's measure to issue $236,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising on average $13 million annually, with levies projected at 3 cents/ $100 of assessed valuation, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and all for local schools, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18425, "no_votes": 9917, "total_votes": 28342, "percent_yes": 65.00952649777714, "percent_no": 34.990473502222855, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Oak Grove School District to issue $236 million i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Oak Grove School District to issue $236 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, upgrade technology and science labs, improve school safety and security, and enhance support facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies projected at 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $13 million annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.266730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.748852", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2658, "fingerprint": "2022|202200546|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200546|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "881a7c8e10e6df32", "measure_id": "202200546", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve school health and safety systems; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical; remove asbestos/ lead pipes; and repair, acquire, construct classrooms, sites, science labs, facilities, equipment, and instructional technology that support student achievement in math, science, engineering, reading, arts and technology, shall Union School District's measure authorizing $128,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 2\u00a2/ $100 assessed value ($7,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10104, "no_votes": 5909, "total_votes": 16013, "percent_yes": 63.09873228002248, "percent_no": 36.90126771997752, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Union School District to issue $128 million in bo...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Union School District to issue $128 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including health and safety systems, infrastructure repairs, asbestos and lead pipe removal, and construction or renovation of classrooms and educational facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 2 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $7 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.269793", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.750446", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2641, "fingerprint": "2022|202200539|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200539|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f46928dc83923790", "measure_id": "202200539", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve science, technology, engineering, art, and math (STEAM) classrooms; increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology; build below-market teacher/ staff rental housing; and improve student safety/ campus security; shall Alum Rock Union Elementary School District's measure authorizing $71.5 million of bonds be adopted (reauthorizing bonds previously approved in November 2012), with legal rates, projected levies less than 2\u00a2/ $100 of assessed valuation (raising $4.4 million/ year while bonds are outstanding), annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13352, "no_votes": 5381, "total_votes": 18733, "percent_yes": 71.27528959590028, "percent_no": 28.724710404099724, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Alum Rock Union Elementary School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Alum Rock Union Elementary School District to issue $71.5 million in bonds to upgrade STEAM classrooms, improve technology access, build below-market teacher/staff housing, and enhance campus safety and security. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies projected at less than 2 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.262907", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.746800", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2642, "fingerprint": "2022|202200540|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200540|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e41c20c90728a420", "measure_id": "202200540", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair and upgrade local elementary/ middle schools, including science, technology, math classrooms/ labs; instructional technology infrastructure; fixing leaky roofs, wiring, plumbing and fire/ security systems; improved accessibility for students with disabilities; shall Campbell Union Elementary School District authorize $96,000,000 in bonds, levying up to $30/ $100,000 assess d value (projecting no increase in current tax rates), generating $5 million annually through term of bonds, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all funds for local elementary/ middle schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19034, "no_votes": 8503, "total_votes": 27537, "percent_yes": 69.1215455568871, "percent_no": 30.8784544431129, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Campbell Union Elementary School District to issue...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Campbell Union Elementary School District to issue $96 million in bonds to repair and upgrade local elementary and middle schools, including improvements to classrooms, labs, infrastructure, and accessibility features. The bonds would be funded through property taxes of up to $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, with citizen oversight and restrictions preventing funds from being used for administrator costs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.263207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.746958", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2660, "fingerprint": "2022|202200085|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200085|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "1bc8afe64c44f857", "measure_id": "202200085", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund Santa Cruz County essential public services including wildfire prevention, emergency response/recovery, street repair, public/mental health services, homelessness programs, and affordable housing, shall Santa Cruz County increase its existing Transient Occupancy Tax, paid by tourists and others staying overnight at lodging facilities in unincorporated areas, from 11% to 12% for hotels/motels/inns, and to 14% for vacation rental properties, providing approximately $2,300,000 annually, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52823, "no_votes": 23478, "total_votes": 76301, "percent_yes": 69.22976107783646, "percent_no": 30.770238922163543, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Santa Cruz County's transient occupancy tax from 11% t...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Santa Cruz County's transient occupancy tax from 11% to 12% for hotels/motels/inns and to 14% for vacation rental properties in unincorporated areas, generating approximately $2.3 million annually for essential public services including wildfire prevention, emergency response, street repair, public health services, homelessness programs, and affordable housing.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.270408", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.750767", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2661, "fingerprint": "2022|202200086|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200086|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "9f776bfe36ebaed7", "measure_id": "202200086", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To reduce pollution, trash and plastics entering local waters and beaches; protect water quality, public health and marine life; address illegal dumping; help prevent wildfires; clean/maintain parks and public areas; and provide environmental education and other general services, shall 12.5 cents of Santa Cruz County\u2019s existing single-use cup charge be collected as a tax until ended by voters, raising approximately $700,000 annually and requiring public spending reports?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52957, "no_votes": 23082, "total_votes": 76039, "percent_yes": 69.64452452031195, "percent_no": 30.355475479688053, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure converts 12", "summary_text": "This measure converts 12.5 cents of Santa Cruz County's existing single-use cup charge into a tax, generating approximately $700,000 annually for environmental programs including pollution reduction, park maintenance, wildfire prevention, and environmental education. The tax would continue until ended by voters and requires public spending reports.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.270702", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.750916", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2662, "fingerprint": "2022|202200087|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200087|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "1a65a72d4f9efe6e", "measure_id": "202200087", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall voters adopt the measure to amend the Circulation Element of the County\u2019s General Plan related to use of the Santa Cruz Branch Line Rail Corridor as set forth in the Santa Cruz County Greenway Initiative Petition?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20616, "no_votes": 56342, "total_votes": 76958, "percent_yes": 26.788637958366902, "percent_no": 73.2113620416331, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Transport: Mass Transit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.271006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.751081", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2663, "fingerprint": "2022|202200383|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200383|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "661358ecbf0c0ca5", "measure_id": "202200383", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "In order to comply with the California Voting Rights Act and promote more diversity and provide greater accountability of elected officials to residents in all City neighborhoods, while maintaining City leadership focused on the interests of the whole community, shall the Santa Cruz City Charter be amended to provide for a directly-elected at-large Mayor, six council districts, updated rules on term limits, and runoff elections?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11490, "no_votes": 5774, "total_votes": 17264, "percent_yes": 66.55468025949953, "percent_no": 33.445319740500466, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Santa Cruz's City Charter to establish a directly-electe...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Santa Cruz's City Charter to establish a directly-elected at-large mayor, create six council districts instead of the previous system, update term limit rules, and implement runoff elections.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.271285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.751241", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2664, "fingerprint": "2022|202200384|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200384|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "941de967f2717f72", "measure_id": "202200384", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect quality of life in the City of Santa Cruz by supporting resources to mitigate the impacts of homelessness, create affordable housing, reduce wildfire risk, maintain City facilities and essential infrastructure, fix streets, support downtown, maintain parks and recreation facilities for youth and seniors, fight climate change, and prevent reductions in important city services, shall the City of Santa Cruz be authorized to augment its General Fund by levying one-half of one percent sales tax, raising about $6 million annually?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8563, "no_votes": 8613, "total_votes": 17176, "percent_yes": 49.85444806707033, "percent_no": 50.14555193292967, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.271644", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.751393", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2669, "fingerprint": "2022|202200549|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200549|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "7a0f4f879cc32bc8", "measure_id": "202200549", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade local middle and high school classrooms/facilities to support achievement in science, math, technology, arts, and skilled trades; build affordable teacher-staff rental housing; install solar/reduce environmental impacts; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical; remove asbestos/lead; shall Santa Cruz City High School District\u2019s measure authorizing $249 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying an estimated 3\u20b5 / $100 assessed value ($12 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33156, "no_votes": 16508, "total_votes": 49664, "percent_yes": 66.76063144329896, "percent_no": 33.23936855670104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Santa Cruz City High School District to issue $24...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Santa Cruz City High School District to issue $249 million in bonds to repair and upgrade middle and high school facilities, build affordable housing for teachers and staff, install solar systems, and address infrastructure issues including asbestos and lead removal. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes estimated at 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.273254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.752167", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2668, "fingerprint": "2022|202200548|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200548|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "b715d6588c32dde0", "measure_id": "202200548", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair/upgrade local elementary schools/classrooms to support achievement in science, math, reading, technology, and arts; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical; remove asbestos and lead; build affordable teacher-staff rental housing; and install solar/reduce environmental impacts; shall the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District measure authorizing $122 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying an estimated 3\u00a2 / $100 assessed value ($6 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17856, "no_votes": 7219, "total_votes": 25075, "percent_yes": 71.21036889332004, "percent_no": 28.789631106679963, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District to issue $122 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, remove hazardous materials, build teacher housing, and install solar systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes estimated at 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.272974", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.752003", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2659, "fingerprint": "2022|202200547|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200547|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "53cea20243d85f4d", "measure_id": "202200547", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide Loma Prieta neighborhood elementary/middle school students with stable funding for current instruction in math, science, reading, technology, arts and other core curriculum; retain/recruit highly qualified teachers, and continue to support classroom technology needs, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementaiy School District's measure be approved establishing an annual parcel tax of $348 for 8 years, raising approximately $640,000 a year, with senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrator's salaries, all funds staying in our local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1372, "no_votes": 679, "total_votes": 2051, "percent_yes": 66.89419795221842, "percent_no": 33.10580204778158, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established an annual parcel tax of $348 for 8 years in the Loma...", "summary_text": "This measure established an annual parcel tax of $348 for 8 years in the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District to fund instruction, teacher retention and recruitment, and classroom technology, raising approximately $640,000 annually. The measure includes senior exemptions, citizen oversight, and restrictions preventing funds from being used for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.270093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.750617", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2665, "fingerprint": "2022|202200385|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200385|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "fb54112b075ba443", "measure_id": "202200385", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Santa Cruz establish an \"Empty Home Tax\" on residences that are in use less than 120 days per calendar year in the amount of $6,000 per single-family residence, $6,000 per parcel with six or fewer units, and $3,000 per year on condominiums and residential units on parcels with seven or more units, with revenue allocated toward affordable housing projects, 15% for administration, and 5% for homeless sanitation services, with administration overseen by a community oversight committee?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11202, "no_votes": 13130, "total_votes": 24332, "percent_yes": 46.03813907611376, "percent_no": 53.96186092388624, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established an annual tax on residential properties u...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established an annual tax on residential properties used less than 120 days per year, with rates of $6,000 for single-family homes and small multi-unit parcels, and $3,000 for condominiums and units in larger developments. The revenue would have funded affordable housing projects, with portions allocated for administration and homeless sanitation services under community oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.272070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.751550", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2666, "fingerprint": "2022|202200386|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200386|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "bc545592d62975c2", "measure_id": "202200386", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Santa Cruz General Plan and Downtown Yes Plan be amended to: (1) prohibit construction of the proposed Downtown Library and Affordable Housing Project and relocation of the Downtown Farmers Market; (2) require development of affordable housing on certain Downtown City-owned surface parking lots; and (3) designate the use of surplus parking district revenue for Downtown affordable housing development projects, alternative transportation programs for downtown workers and other non-parking related expenditures?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9656, "no_votes": 14174, "total_votes": 23830, "percent_yes": 40.52035249685271, "percent_no": 59.47964750314729, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.272338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.751704", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2667, "fingerprint": "2022|202200387|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200387|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "5e08114ea87d23d1", "measure_id": "202200387", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund essential City services, including wildfire prevention; public safety; emergency response; creeks/steams protection; clean parks and public restrooms; street and sidewalk maintenance; affordable housing for working families and the homeless; creating local jobs, shall City of Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax, paid by tourists and others staying overnight at lodging facilities, from 11% to 12% for hotels/motels/inns, and from 11% to 14% for short-term residential vacation rentals, providing approximately $1,380,000 annually?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19437, "no_votes": 4675, "total_votes": 24112, "percent_yes": 80.61131386861314, "percent_no": 19.388686131386862, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Santa Cruz's transient occupancy tax from 11% to 12% f...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Santa Cruz's transient occupancy tax from 11% to 12% for hotels, motels, and inns, and from 11% to 14% for short-term vacation rentals. The tax increase was projected to generate approximately $1.38 million annually for various city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and affordable housing.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.272622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.751853", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2670, "fingerprint": "2022|202200388|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200388|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "7fbda436f60f0f0c", "measure_id": "202200388", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Watsonville amend provisions of the Watsonville General Plan as provided in the Watsonville Planned Growth and Farmland Protection Initiative?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5757, "no_votes": 2738, "total_votes": 8495, "percent_yes": 67.7692760447322, "percent_no": 32.230723955267806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Watsonville General Plan through the Watsonville Pla...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Watsonville General Plan through the Watsonville Planned Growth and Farmland Protection Initiative, though the specific changes to land use provisions are not detailed in the ballot language provided.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.273541", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.752329", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2671, "fingerprint": "2022|202200389|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200389|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ddc566ba87ff6e3a", "measure_id": "202200389", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide locally-controlled funding for Watsonville\u2019s essential general services, including: afterschool and anti-gang programs that keep kids safe; creating safe places to play; keeping parks/ Watsonville Slough trails safe and clean; repairing, expanding, improving parks/playgrounds; fixing potholes; maintaining streets; creating jobs; supporting local businesses, libraries, senior meal programs and general government use; shall the City of Watsonville measure be adopted levying one-half cent sales tax, until ended by voters, providing $5 million dollars annually, with community oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5580, "no_votes": 3084, "total_votes": 8664, "percent_yes": 64.40443213296399, "percent_no": 35.59556786703601, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would impose a half-cent sales tax in Watsonville to fund general...", "summary_text": "The measure would impose a half-cent sales tax in Watsonville to fund general city services including parks maintenance, street repairs, youth programs, libraries, and other municipal operations, generating approximately $5 million annually until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.273893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.752488", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2672, "fingerprint": "2022|202200390|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200390|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "5d2b439ab23b3d31", "measure_id": "202200390", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Watsonville maintain the restrictions on growth approved by the voters in 2002 until 2040, with the exception of any property identified by the City Council during the General Plan update, subject to community input, as being well suited for development that would create local jobs, parks, and safe spaces for kids to play, or housing for working families, seniors, and residents with disabilities?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4286, "no_votes": 4275, "total_votes": 8561, "percent_yes": 50.064244831211305, "percent_no": 49.935755168788695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Growth Cap/Boundary", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Watsonville's voter-approved growth restrictions from 20...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Watsonville's voter-approved growth restrictions from 2002 until 2040, while allowing the City Council to exempt properties during General Plan updates that are deemed suitable for job creation, parks, recreational spaces, or housing for working families, seniors, and disabled residents. The exemptions would be subject to community input processes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.274161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.752690", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2673, "fingerprint": "2022|202200391|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200391|SHASTA", "content_hash": "a6c40cd64e8a796b", "measure_id": "202200391", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SHASTA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11562, "no_votes": 18486, "total_votes": 30048, "percent_yes": 38.47843450479233, "percent_no": 61.52156549520767, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.274423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.752844", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHASTA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2674, "fingerprint": "2022|202200088|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200088|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "194c46c81d5855b4", "measure_id": "202200088", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SISKIYOU Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the current voter elected position of County Auditor-Controller become a Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors\u2019 appointed position of Auditor-Controller with an effective date of January 1, 2027?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4161, "no_votes": 6668, "total_votes": 10829, "percent_yes": 38.42460060947456, "percent_no": 61.57539939052544, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the Siskiyou County Auditor-Controller positi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the Siskiyou County Auditor-Controller position from an elected office to one appointed by the Board of Supervisors, effective January 1, 2027.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.274801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.752993", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SISKIYOU Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2675, "fingerprint": "2022|202200392|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200392|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "119b59f6b457931c", "measure_id": "202200392", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SISKIYOU Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "In order to assure that the City of Yreka\u2019s finances are overseen by a trained and qualified individual, shall the office of City Treasurer be changed from elective to appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1207, "no_votes": 1278, "total_votes": 2485, "percent_yes": 48.57142857142857, "percent_no": 51.42857142857143, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the City of Yreka's City Treasurer position f...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the City of Yreka's City Treasurer position from an elected office to one appointed by the city government.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.275144", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.753152", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SISKIYOU Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2678, "fingerprint": "2022|202200395|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200395|SOLANO", "content_hash": "a733f2454f36cf93", "measure_id": "202200395", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to maintain Dixon's essential services such as fire prevention; rapid 911 emergency response/neighborhood police patrols; disaster preparedness; crime/gangs/drugs prevention; street/pothole repair; attract/retain local businesses/jobs; and for general government use; by establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $3,100,000 annually, with independent citizen oversight and no money that can be taken by the State, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2674, "no_votes": 3412, "total_votes": 6086, "percent_yes": 43.936904370686825, "percent_no": 56.063095629313175, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 1-cent sales tax in Dixon, California t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 1-cent sales tax in Dixon, California to fund various city services including fire prevention, police patrols, street repairs, and general government operations, generating approximately $3.1 million annually. The tax would have remained in effect until repealed by voters and included provisions for citizen oversight and protection from state seizure of funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.276018", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.753622", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2680, "fingerprint": "2022|202200089|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200089|SOLANO", "content_hash": "433bad6ad47f525f", "measure_id": "202200089", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide general County services, such as enhancing fire protection to reduce wildfire risk, preventing spread of wildfires from wildland areas to residential neighborhoods, improving 9-1-1 response times, adding rural and city firebreaks/reducing flammable vegetation, adding firefighters/paramedics, and improving early wildfire detection shall Solano County\u2019s ordinance enacting a 1/8% sales tax until ended by voters be adopted, requiring independent oversight, audits, and all revue controlled locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58141, "no_votes": 68688, "total_votes": 126829, "percent_yes": 45.84203928123694, "percent_no": 54.15796071876306, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have enacted a 1/8% sales tax in Solano County to fund fir...", "summary_text": "This measure would have enacted a 1/8% sales tax in Solano County to fund fire protection services, including wildfire prevention, faster emergency response times, additional firefighters and paramedics, and vegetation management. The tax would have remained in effect until repealed by voters and included requirements for independent oversight and audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.276597", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.753951", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2676, "fingerprint": "2022|202200393|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200393|SOLANO", "content_hash": "845f5ba27613e323", "measure_id": "202200393", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue the existing protections provided by the current Urban Growth Boundary (\"UGB\"), such as preventing urban sprawl, and preserving agricultural land and open space, shall the City of Benicia extend the existing UGB until December 31,2043, clarify the uses permitted beyond the UGB, and require that future changes to the UGB be approved by the voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10462, "no_votes": 2330, "total_votes": 12792, "percent_yes": 81.7854909318324, "percent_no": 18.2145090681676, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Benicia's existing Urban Growth Boundary until December ...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Benicia's existing Urban Growth Boundary until December 31, 2043, clarifies permitted uses beyond the boundary, and requires voter approval for future changes to the boundary.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.275409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.753306", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2681, "fingerprint": "2022|202200551|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200551|SOLANO", "content_hash": "71943cc5b1d29161", "measure_id": "202200551", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To repair aging schools by replacing plumbing, electrical, heating, and air conditioning systems; updating/adding classrooms for math, science, English, robotics/technology instruction; and improving safety and security, shall the Travis Unified School District measure authorizing $64 million dollars in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 6 cents per $100 dollars of assessed value ($4 million dollars annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrators, and all funds for local schools only?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3654, "no_votes": 3653, "total_votes": 7307, "percent_yes": 50.00684275352402, "percent_no": 49.99315724647598, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.276885", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.754114", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2683, "fingerprint": "2022|202200396|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200396|SOLANO", "content_hash": "570b686a1890c691", "measure_id": "202200396", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain critical city services, such as keeping public spaces healthy/safe/clean; maintaining fire protection/emergency medical response/crime prevention; addressing homelessness/blight/ dumping; repairing deteriorating neighborhood streets/roads/ sidewalks; and for general government use; shall the City of Vallejo adopt a measure establishing a 0.875% sales tax, providing $18,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, independent citizen oversight, and all funds legally required to be spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16923, "no_votes": 14028, "total_votes": 30951, "percent_yes": 54.67674711640981, "percent_no": 45.32325288359019, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a 0.875% sales tax in Vallejo that would generate approximately $18 million annually for city services including fire protection, emergency medical response, crime prevention, street repairs, and addressing homelessness. The tax would continue until ended by voters and includes requirements for audits, citizen oversight, and local spending of all funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.277467", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.754431", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2682, "fingerprint": "2022|202200552|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200552|SOLANO", "content_hash": "b3c881d96afc0043", "measure_id": "202200552", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; provide science, technology, engineering, and mathematics labs/classrooms; construct, upgrade, and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair/replace leaky roofs, shall Vacaville Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $229,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $13,745,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4.5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent oversight committees, NO money for teacher salaries, and all funds spent locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12001, "no_votes": 15555, "total_votes": 27556, "percent_yes": 43.5513136884889, "percent_no": 56.4486863115111, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.277196", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.754271", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2677, "fingerprint": "2022|202200394|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200394|SOLANO", "content_hash": "6e4b70e53ead1ad7", "measure_id": "202200394", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Benicia enact a measure raising local funds under local control for general government purposes, including: repairing, paving and maintaining deteriorating streets; fixing potholes; improving safe routes to schools; protecting local creeks and the bay from toxins and pollution by fixing aging, deteriorating storm drains; by adopting \u00be cent sales tax, providing approximately $5,000,000 annually, with citizens' oversight and annual audits, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6300, "no_votes": 6594, "total_votes": 12894, "percent_yes": 48.85993485342019, "percent_no": 51.14006514657981, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have enacted a 0.75% sales tax in Benicia to raise approximately $5 million annually for general government services including street maintenance, pothole repair, school route improvements, and storm drain fixes. The tax would have continued until terminated by voters and included provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.275723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.753457", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2679, "fingerprint": "2022|202200550|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200550|SOLANO", "content_hash": "df926ebb150ee0cc", "measure_id": "202200550", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SOLANO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; repair or replace leaky roofs; and construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $249,600,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $17,700,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19493, "no_votes": 15932, "total_votes": 35425, "percent_yes": 55.02611150317572, "percent_no": 44.97388849682428, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District to issue $249,600,000 in bonds to fund school facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom construction and modernization, accessibility upgrades, and health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 4 cents per $100 of assessed property value, generating an average of $17,700,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.276322", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.753781", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SOLANO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2690, "fingerprint": "2022|202200553|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200553|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f36c73e304a5af00", "measure_id": "202200553", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support academic excellence for Kenwood students, maintain quality STEM, art and music programs, continue to integrate modern technology into classrooms, and attract and retain high quality teachers; shall Kenwood School District\u2019s measure renewing the existing parcel tax for five years at the same rate of $52 per parcel annually, raising approximately $110,000 per year with certain exemptions including for seniors, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1826, "no_votes": 425, "total_votes": 2251, "percent_yes": 81.1195024433585, "percent_no": 18.8804975566415, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed Kenwood School District's existing parcel tax at $52 per...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed Kenwood School District's existing parcel tax at $52 per parcel annually for five years to raise approximately $110,000 per year for educational programs and staff retention. The tax includes exemptions for certain groups including seniors.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.280718", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.755539", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2684, "fingerprint": "2022|202200554|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200554|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ab9d969784d7518b", "measure_id": "202200554", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve educational facilities; construct career technical education classrooms and facilities; upgrade classroom technology and improve technology infrastructure, shall the Calistoga Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $41,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately 3.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation (raising $2,200,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a board appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134, "no_votes": 96, "total_votes": 230, "percent_yes": 58.26086956521739, "percent_no": 41.73913043478261, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Calistoga Joint Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Calistoga Joint Unified School District to issue $41 million in bonds to construct career technical education facilities, upgrade classroom technology, and improve educational infrastructure. The bonds would be funded through a property tax levy of approximately 3.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising about $2.2 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.277761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.754585", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2696, "fingerprint": "2022|202200559|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200559|SONOMA", "content_hash": "d696e351d88e4a46", "measure_id": "202200559", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade Santa Rosa middle and high school classrooms, science labs, learning technology, and job training facilities; repair/ replace deteriorating portables, leaky roofs inefficient heating/ cooling/ electrical/ plumbing systems; and improve campus security, fire/ earthquake safety; shall City of Santa Rosa High School District\u2019s measure authorizing $398,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3\u00a2/ $100 of assessed value ($20,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent oversight, annual audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47909, "no_votes": 23939, "total_votes": 71848, "percent_yes": 66.68104888097093, "percent_no": 33.318951119029066, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Santa Rosa High School District to issue $398 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Santa Rosa High School District to issue $398 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, science labs, technology, and job training facilities, as well as repair infrastructure and improve safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $20 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.282701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.756549", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2686, "fingerprint": "2022|202200555|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200555|SONOMA", "content_hash": "199fe51ae42bec35", "measure_id": "202200555", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To address facilities needs at Forestville Elementary School, including repairing leaky roofs and other aging infrastructure; supporting student programs; and reducing energy costs by continuing to increase energy efficiency; shall Forestville Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $6,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying approximately 2.0 cents per $100 and raising an estimated average $475,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, all funds staying local and No money for administrators\u2019 salaries, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2244, "no_votes": 1126, "total_votes": 3370, "percent_yes": 66.58753709198814, "percent_no": 33.41246290801186, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Forestville Union School District to issue $6", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Forestville Union School District to issue $6.5 million in bonds to repair aging infrastructure including leaky roofs, support student programs, and improve energy efficiency at Forestville Elementary School. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 2.0 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising an estimated average of $475,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.278848", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.754905", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2689, "fingerprint": "2022|202200556|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200556|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ee107cfe1e758124", "measure_id": "202200556", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and repair school facilities; fix roofs, restrooms, HVAC, septic/water, asphalt and other infrastructure; address energy efficiency, life-safety and ADA compliance; and relieve teacher and workforce housing shortages; shall Horicon Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $10,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, raising an estimated average $745,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens\u2019 oversight, audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds staying local, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 616, "no_votes": 199, "total_votes": 815, "percent_yes": 75.58282208588956, "percent_no": 24.41717791411044, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Horicon Elementary School District to issue $10", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Horicon Elementary School District to issue $10.4 million in bonds to fund school facility maintenance and repairs, including roofs, restrooms, HVAC systems, and infrastructure improvements, as well as teacher and workforce housing. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.280280", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.755372", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2691, "fingerprint": "2022|202200557|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200557|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e21048add8cf42d6", "measure_id": "202200557", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of educational facilities; repair or replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing and sewer systems; modernize, renovate and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; and provide systems addressing power outages; shall Kenwood School District\u2019s measure to issue $17,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, raising approximately $995,000 annually while bonds are outstanding averaging 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, with oversight, annual audits and all funds improving local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1820, "no_votes": 863, "total_votes": 2683, "percent_yes": 67.83451360417443, "percent_no": 32.16548639582557, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Kenwood School District to issue $17 million in bo...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Kenwood School District to issue $17 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct school facilities including roofs, plumbing, classrooms, and safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising approximately $995,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.281105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.755703", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2695, "fingerprint": "2022|202200558|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200558|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0b22178e0a9657ff", "measure_id": "202200558", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade Santa Rosa elementary school classrooms, science labs, learning technology and art and music classrooms; repair/ replace deteriorating portables, leaky roofs inefficient heating/ cooling/ electrical/ plumbing systems; and improve campus security, fire and earthquake safety; shall City of Santa Rosa Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $125,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3\u00a2/ $100 of assessed value ($6,300,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent oversight, annual audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15418, "no_votes": 6125, "total_votes": 21543, "percent_yes": 71.5684909251265, "percent_no": 28.431509074873503, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Santa Rosa Elementary School District to issue $1...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Santa Rosa Elementary School District to issue $125 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, science labs, technology and arts facilities, repair aging infrastructure systems, and improve campus safety features. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $6.3 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.282380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.756347", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2692, "fingerprint": "2022|202200400|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200400|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a0da64081371acbd", "measure_id": "202200400", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To renew locally controlled funding for public safety services in Santa Rosa; reduce wildfire risk; maintain rapid 9-1-1 emergency response/ early fire alerts/ evacuation planning; provide mental health counseling/ violence prevention programs for at-risk youth/ families; and prevent reductions of firefighters/ paramedics/ law enforcement officers, shall the City of Santa Rosa\u2019s measure be adopted extending the expiring public safety sales tax for twenty years, without increasing the 1/4\u00a2 rate, raising $10,000,000 annually with annual audits/ citizen oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43818, "no_votes": 16144, "total_votes": 59962, "percent_yes": 73.07628164504186, "percent_no": 26.92371835495814, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews Santa Rosa's existing quarter-cent sales tax for public s...", "summary_text": "This measure renews Santa Rosa's existing quarter-cent sales tax for public safety services for twenty years without increasing the current rate. The tax would generate approximately $10 million annually to fund emergency response services, wildfire prevention, mental health programs, and maintain staffing levels for firefighters, paramedics, and police officers.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.281410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.755866", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2693, "fingerprint": "2022|202200401|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200401|SONOMA", "content_hash": "35e9bad6a9ae58c5", "measure_id": "202200401", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Santa Rosa\u2019s measure to amend the Santa Rosa City Charter to affirm the City\u2019s recent transition from the election of Council members by city-wide vote to the election of Council members by district, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39474, "no_votes": 16710, "total_votes": 56184, "percent_yes": 70.25843656557026, "percent_no": 29.741563434429736, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Santa Rosa's City Charter to formally codify the city's ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Santa Rosa's City Charter to formally codify the city's recent change from electing City Council members through citywide voting to electing them by district. The amendment affirmed a transition that had already been implemented.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.281735", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.756028", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2694, "fingerprint": "2022|202200402|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200402|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0cc7287fd375e85e", "measure_id": "202200402", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Santa Rosa\u2019s measure to update and modernize the language of the Santa Rosa City Charter, including revisions to remove ambiguities, to provide additional flexibility in City operations, and to ensure gender and citizenship neutrality, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39128, "no_votes": 18751, "total_votes": 57879, "percent_yes": 67.60310302527687, "percent_no": 32.396896974723134, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.282078", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.756188", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2685, "fingerprint": "2022|202200397|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200397|SONOMA", "content_hash": "b303e02476063ca7", "measure_id": "202200397", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that prohibits the sale and use of all fireworks, including \u201csafe and sane\u201d fireworks, within the City, with an exception for permitted public fireworks displays?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1650, "no_votes": 1855, "total_votes": 3505, "percent_yes": 47.07560627674751, "percent_no": 52.92439372325249, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have prohibited the sale and use of all fireworks within So...", "summary_text": "The measure would have prohibited the sale and use of all fireworks within Sonoma, including \"safe and sane\" fireworks, while allowing permitted public fireworks displays to continue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.278407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.754750", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2687, "fingerprint": "2022|202200398|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200398|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a1442b72d4c535ad", "measure_id": "202200398", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Healdsburg adopt an ordinance amending the City\u2019s Transient Occupancy Tax to facilitate acquisition and construction of capital improvements for parks, community services facilities, and affordable housing, including payment of principal, interest, and cost of indebtedness, without altering any other mechanics or rates of the Transient Occupancy Tax?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3707, "no_votes": 1169, "total_votes": 4876, "percent_yes": 76.02543068088598, "percent_no": 23.974569319114025, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended Healdsburg's Transient Occupancy Tax to allow the revenue...", "summary_text": "The measure amended Healdsburg's Transient Occupancy Tax to allow the revenue to be used for acquiring and constructing parks, community services facilities, and affordable housing, as well as paying related debt costs. The tax rate and other mechanics remained unchanged.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.279342", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.755066", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2688, "fingerprint": "2022|202200399|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200399|SONOMA", "content_hash": "00daa6e9893b63da", "measure_id": "202200399", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure establishing a City of Healdsburg cannabis business tax at annual rates up to and not to exceed 8% of gross receipts for cannabis businesses, and estimated to generate approximately $500,000 annually in tax revenue until ended by voters, to be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including police, fire and emergency services, parks, affordable housing, and street maintenance, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3529, "no_votes": 1340, "total_votes": 4869, "percent_yes": 72.47894844937359, "percent_no": 27.52105155062641, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a cannabis business tax in Healdsburg at rates up to ...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a cannabis business tax in Healdsburg at rates up to 8% of gross receipts, estimated to generate approximately $500,000 annually for general city services including police, fire, parks, affordable housing, and street maintenance. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.279794", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.755224", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2697, "fingerprint": "2022|202200403|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200403|SONOMA", "content_hash": "dfdfe7b034808b1e", "measure_id": "202200403", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Without raising current tax rates, and to maintain City services including Police and Fire, 9-1-1 emergency services, park maintenance and repair, youth and senior recreation, and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the existing Utility Users Tax at the current rate of 3.75%, by removing the sunset date until voters otherwise decide, providing approximately $700,000 annually that cannot be taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3244, "no_votes": 645, "total_votes": 3889, "percent_yes": 83.41475957829776, "percent_no": 16.585240421702238, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would make permanent Sonoma's existing 3", "summary_text": "This measure would make permanent Sonoma's existing 3.75% utility users tax by removing its sunset date, generating approximately $700,000 annually for general city services. The tax rate would remain unchanged from current levels.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.283032", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.756722", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2703, "fingerprint": "2022|202200406|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200406|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "e81258845f827cc8", "measure_id": "202200406", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the elective mayor for the City of Waterford serve a four-year term?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1046, "no_votes": 839, "total_votes": 1885, "percent_yes": 55.49071618037136, "percent_no": 44.50928381962864, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would change the term length for Waterford's elected mayor from ...", "summary_text": "This measure would change the term length for Waterford's elected mayor from the current term to a four-year term.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.285121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.757661", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2698, "fingerprint": "2022|202200560|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200560|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "df1cc919462aa760", "measure_id": "202200560", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure for decreasing the number of members of the governing board of Knights Ferry Elementary School District from five to three be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 90, "no_votes": 161, "total_votes": 251, "percent_yes": 35.85657370517929, "percent_no": 64.14342629482071, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.283320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.756877", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2702, "fingerprint": "2022|202200562|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200562|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "df77326c71739f74", "measure_id": "202200562", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To expand vocational career and technical education facilities; increase labs and training sites to prepare students for college and future jobs; and build new classrooms to relieve overcrowding; shall Patterson Joint Unified School District\u2019s bond authorizing $74 million be approved with legal rates, projected levies below $57/ $100,000 of assessed valuation (generating $3.9 million/ year while bonds are outstanding), annual audits, independent oversight and all funds spent locally with no money taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3422, "no_votes": 2200, "total_votes": 5622, "percent_yes": 60.86801849875489, "percent_no": 39.13198150124511, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Patterson Joint Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Patterson Joint Unified School District to issue $74 million in bonds to expand vocational and technical education facilities, increase labs and training sites, and build new classrooms to address overcrowding. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies projected at below $57 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.284791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.757489", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2699, "fingerprint": "2022|202200404|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200404|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "e1bca8a74ecc3a6a", "measure_id": "202200404", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To promote efficiency, transparency, and modernization of City government, shall the Charter of the City of Modesto be amended to increase and clarify the powers and duties of the City Auditor, create a permanent audit committee, change the timing of the mayoral election to coincide with the statewide primary and general election, adjust the timeline for preparation and adoption of the annual budget, and make several other minor changes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34310, "no_votes": 15721, "total_votes": 50031, "percent_yes": 68.57748196118406, "percent_no": 31.422518038815937, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.283666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.757023", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2700, "fingerprint": "2022|202200405|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200405|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "bdd55971e60af490", "measure_id": "202200405", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund general city services in the City of Modesto, such as police patrols, gang, drug, and crime prevention; fire protection, paramedic/911 emergency response; addressing homelessness; cleaning-up trash and illegal dumping; keeping streets, parks, sidewalks, landscapes and infrastructure safe, clean, and well-maintained, shall an ordinance establishing a one-cent sales tax be adopted, providing $39,000,000 annually for general government use in Modesto until ended by voters, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32031, "no_votes": 18897, "total_votes": 50928, "percent_yes": 62.89467483506126, "percent_no": 37.10532516493874, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in Modesto to generate approxim...", "summary_text": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in Modesto to generate approximately $39 million annually for general city services including police, fire, emergency response, homelessness programs, and infrastructure maintenance. The tax continues indefinitely until voters choose to end it and includes citizen oversight provisions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.283988", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.757174", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2704, "fingerprint": "2022|202200563|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200563|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "093bf0949961c4cf", "measure_id": "202200563", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Waterford Unified School District\u2019s measure to expand vocational education sites; renovate classrooms including math, science and engineering labs; update emergency preparedness and improve handicapped access be adopted, authorizing $5.57 million of bonds with legal interest rates, projected levies averaging below 3\u00a2/ $100 of assessed valuation (averaging $370,000/ year for 26 years), annual audits, citizen oversight and no increase in tax rates?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1321, "no_votes": 1111, "total_votes": 2432, "percent_yes": 54.317434210526315, "percent_no": 45.682565789473685, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Waterford Unified School District to issue $5", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Waterford Unified School District to issue $5.57 million in bonds to expand vocational education sites, renovate classrooms and labs, and improve emergency preparedness and handicapped accessibility. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies averaging below 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation over 26 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.285422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.757839", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2701, "fingerprint": "2022|202200561|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200561|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "c09d69fa23eea510", "measure_id": "202200561", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update career training classrooms, labs/equipment to prepare students for the workforce; repair leaking roofs/deteriorating plumbing; and update classrooms/science labs for quality instruction in math, science, reading/writing, shall the Modesto City High School District measure be adopted authorizing $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, providing approximately $9,700,000 annually at an estimated 2.9 cents per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and funds used locally?\u00a0", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36339, "no_votes": 28107, "total_votes": 64446, "percent_yes": 56.38674238897682, "percent_no": 43.61325761102318, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Modesto City High School District to issue $198 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Modesto City High School District to issue $198 million in bonds to update career training facilities, repair infrastructure like roofs and plumbing, and modernize classrooms and science labs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 2.9 cents per $100 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.284425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.757325", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2705, "fingerprint": "2022|202200090|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200090|SUTTER", "content_hash": "b0dd9955f61c7e3d", "measure_id": "202200090", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SUTTER Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance generating locally controlled revenue for Sutter County\u2019s general purposes, such as maintaining fire and emergency response times, sheriff\u2019s patrols, wildfire response, veterans services; providing firefighting equipment/training; repairing roads; addressing homelessness; preventing County fire station closure; ensuring fiscal stability, by levying a 1\u00a2 sales tax for 9 years, raising approximately $19,600,000 annually that cannot be taken by Sacramento, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, public review/disclosure of spending, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13152, "no_votes": 14027, "total_votes": 27179, "percent_yes": 48.39030133558998, "percent_no": 51.60969866441002, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.285744", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.758031", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SUTTER Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2706, "fingerprint": "2022|202200407|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200407|SUTTER", "content_hash": "f5709ef174ac2caf", "measure_id": "202200407", "measure_letter": "Z1", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SUTTER Measure Z1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of the city treasurer be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5688, "no_votes": 11020, "total_votes": 16708, "percent_yes": 34.04357194158487, "percent_no": 65.95642805841513, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.286106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.758199", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SUTTER Measure Z1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11076, "fingerprint": "2022|202200408|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200408|SUTTER", "content_hash": "8d7e04075d19bba3", "measure_id": "202200408", "measure_letter": "Z2", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SUTTER Measure Z2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5700, "no_votes": 10987, "total_votes": 16687, "percent_yes": 34.158326841253675, "percent_no": 65.84167315874632, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.330550", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.286405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.758349", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SUTTER Measure Z2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10943, "fingerprint": "2022|PROP_31|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|PROP_31|Statewide", "content_hash": "edd3dd508c820c1f", "measure_id": "PROP_31", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 31, Flavored Tobacco Products Ban Referendum (2022)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The official ballot title was as follows:[7] \u201c Referendum Challenging a 2020 Law Prohibiting Retail Sale of Certain Flavored Tobacco Products.[8] \u201d The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[7]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6803424, "no_votes": 3923383, "total_votes": 10726807, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_31,_Flavored_Tobacco_Products_Ban_Referendum_(2022)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The official ballot title was as follows:[7]", "summary_text": "The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[7] \u201c If the required number of registered voters sign this petition and the petition is timely filed, there will be a referendum challenging a 2020 law on the next statewide ballot after the November 3, 2020 general election. The challenged law prohibits the retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products and tobacco flavor enhancers. The referendum would require a majority of voters to approve the 2020 state law before it can take effect.[8] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:27.628483", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:27.628483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:27.628483", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 31, Flavored Tobacco Products Ban Referendum (2022)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_31_(2022)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2022/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2022", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2031%202022", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2031%202022", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10942, "fingerprint": "2022|PROP_30|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|PROP_30|Statewide", "content_hash": "4f4f5a405241bf62", "measure_id": "PROP_30", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 30, Tax on Income Above $2 Million for Zero-Emissions Vehicles and Wildfire Prevention Initiative (2022)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[6][1] \u201c Provides Funding for Programs to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Increasing Tax on Personal Income Over $2 Million. Initiative Statute.[7] \u201d The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[1]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4560483, "no_votes": 6203806, "total_votes": 10764289, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_30,_Tax_on_Income_Above_$2_Million_for_Zero-Emissions_Vehicles_and_Wildfire_Prevention_Initiative_(2022)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[6][1]", "summary_text": "The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[1] \u201c Increases tax on personal income over $2 million by 1.75% for individuals and married couples and allocates new tax revenues as follows: (1) 45% for rebates and other incentives for zero-emission vehicle purchases and 35% for charging stations for zero-emission vehicles, with at least half of this funding directed to low-income households and communities; and (2) 20% for wildfire prevention and suppression programs, with priority given to hiring and training firefighters. Requires audits of programs and expenditures.[7] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:26.720937", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:26.720937", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:26.720937", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 30, Tax on Income Above $2 Million for Zero-Emissions Vehicles and Wildfire Prevention Initiative (2022)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_30_(2022)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2022/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2022", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2030%202022", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2030%202022", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10941, "fingerprint": "2022|PROP_29|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|PROP_29|Statewide", "content_hash": "f86ffab6c66678ba", "measure_id": "PROP_29", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 29, Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative (2022)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[6] \u201c Requires on-site Licensed Medical Professional at Kidney Dialysis Clinics and Establishes Other State Requirements. Initiative Statute.[7] \u201d The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[6]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3364404, "no_votes": 7281196, "total_votes": 10645600, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_29,_Dialysis_Clinic_Requirements_Initiative_(2022)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": "The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[6] \u201c Requires physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant, with six months\u2019 relevant experience, on site during treatment at outpatient kidney dialysis clinics; authorizes exemption for staffing shortage if qualified medical professional is available through telehealth. Requires clinics to disclose to patients all physicians with clinic ownership interests of five percent or more. Requires clinics to report dialysis-related infection data to state. Prohibits clinics from closing or substantially reducing services without state approval. Prohibits clinics from refusing to treat patients based on source of payment.[7] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:25.798287", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:25.798287", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:25.798287", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 29, Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative (2022)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_29_(2022)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2022/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2022", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2029%202022", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2029%202022", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10940, "fingerprint": "2022|PROP_28|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|PROP_28|Statewide", "content_hash": "cb23ad0648ef7b57", "measure_id": "PROP_28", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 28, Art and Music K-12 Education Funding Initiative (2022)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[6] \u201c Provides Additional Funding for Arts and Music Education in Public Schools. Initiative Statute.[7] \u201d The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[6]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6924613, "no_votes": 3827967, "total_votes": 10752580, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_28,_Art_and_Music_K-12_Education_Funding_Initiative_(2022)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[6]", "summary_text": "The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[6] \u201c Provides additional funding for arts and music education in all K-12 public schools (including charter schools) by annually allocating from state General Fund an amount equaling 1% of required state and local funding for public schools. Allocates greater proportion of the funds to schools serving more economically disadvantaged students. Schools with 500 or more students must spend at least 80% of funding to employ teachers and remainder on training, supplies, and education partnerships. Requires audits and limits administrative costs to 1% of funding.[7] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:24.532442", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:24.532442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:24.532442", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 28, Art and Music K-12 Education Funding Initiative (2022)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_28_(2022)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2022/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2022", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2028%202022", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2028%202022", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10939, "fingerprint": "2022|PROP_27|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|PROP_27|Statewide", "content_hash": "05633e24e5bd5e54", "measure_id": "PROP_27", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 27, Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative (2022)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[5] \u201c Allows Online and Mobile Sports Wagering. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.[6] \u201d The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[5]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1906339, "no_votes": 8849200, "total_votes": 10755539, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_27,_Legalize_Sports_Betting_and_Revenue_for_Homelessness_Prevention_Fund_Initiative_(2022)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[5]", "summary_text": "The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[5] \u201c Legalizes online and mobile sports wagering, which currently is prohibited, for persons 21 years and older. Such wagering may be offered only by federally recognized Indian tribes and eligible businesses that contract with them. Individuals placing bets must be in California and not located on Indian lands. Imposes 10% tax on sports-wagering revenues and licensing fees. Directs tax and licensing revenues first to regulatory costs, then remainder to: 85% to homelessness programs; 15% to nonparticipating tribes. Specifies licensing, regulatory, consumer-protection, and betting-integrity standards for sports wagering.[6] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:22.954447", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:22.954447", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:22.954447", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 27, Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative (2022)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_27_(2022)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2022/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2022", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2027%202022", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2027%202022", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10938, "fingerprint": "2022|PROP_26|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|PROP_26|Statewide", "content_hash": "ebe7938fddd83312", "measure_id": "PROP_26", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 26, Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative (2022)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The official ballot title was as follows:[3] \u201c Authorizes New Types of Gambling. Initiative Constitutional and Statutory Amendment.[4] \u201d The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[3]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3514593, "no_votes": 7129122, "total_votes": 10643715, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_26,_Legalize_Sports_Betting_on_American_Indian_Lands_Initiative_(2022)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The official ballot title was as follows:[3]", "summary_text": "The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[3] \u201c Allows federally recognized Native American tribes to operate roulette, dice games, and sports wagering on tribal lands, subject to compacts negotiated by the Governor and ratified by the Legislature. Beginning in 2022, allows on-site sports wagering at only privately operated horse-racing tracks in four specified counties for persons 21 years or older. Imposes 10 percent tax on sports-wagering profits at horse-racing tracks; directs portion of revenues to enforcement and problem-gambling programs. Prohibits marketing of sports wagering to persons under 21. Authorizes private lawsuits to enforce other gambling laws.[4] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:21.627261", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:21.627261", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:21.627261", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 26, Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative (2022)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_26_(2022)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2022/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2022", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2026%202022", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2026%202022", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10937, "fingerprint": "2022|PROP_1|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|PROP_1|Statewide", "content_hash": "48efc84bc13b9532", "measure_id": "PROP_1", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 1, Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2022)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[10][11] \u201c Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.[12] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[10]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7176883, "no_votes": 3553561, "total_votes": 10730444, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1,_Right_to_Reproductive_Freedom_Amendment_(2022)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[10][11]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[10] \u201c Amends California Constitution to expressly include an individual\u2019s fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which includes the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and the fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives. This amendment does not narrow or limit the existing rights to privacy and equal protection under the California Constitution.[12] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:20.032787", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:20.032787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:20.032787", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 1, Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2022)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(2022)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2022/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2022", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%202022", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%202022", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 2707, "fingerprint": "2022|202200409|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200409|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "604472685fc61e7d", "measure_id": "202200409", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TEHAMA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Ordinance be adopted? This proponent driven Ordinance would replace the City's existing  Ordinance No. 1063 which was passed on  February 15, 2022, and which currently  allows Commercial Cannabis activity within City Limits including dispensaries, delivery,  cultivation, manufacturing, testing, and microbusiness.  The proposed Ordinance replaces the existing City Ordinance and in general, allows for a sliding scale of commercial activities based on population, consumption lounges, places a local preference on all applications, and regulates personal cultivation.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1137, "no_votes": 2287, "total_votes": 3424, "percent_yes": 33.206775700934585, "percent_no": 66.79322429906541, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance would replace Tehama's existing commercial cannabis regulations...", "summary_text": "The ordinance would replace Tehama's existing commercial cannabis regulations with new rules that establish a sliding scale of commercial cannabis activities based on population, allow consumption lounges, give local preference to applicants, and regulate personal cultivation. It would modify the current framework that permits dispensaries, delivery, cultivation, manufacturing, testing, and microbusiness operations within city limits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.286697", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.758524", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TEHAMA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2708, "fingerprint": "2022|202200564|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200564|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "3e414c4507f2e304", "measure_id": "202200564", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TEHAMA Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize,  renovate, and upgrade classrooms,  restrooms and school facilities to improve  the quality of education; make  safety/security improvements; replace leaky  roofs; and renovate/replace HVAC,  plumbing, sewer, and electrical systems;  shall Red Bluff Union Elementary School  District's measure authorizing $14,100,000  in bonds, at legal interest rates, levying  approximately 2.3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed  valuation (raising $797,560 annually) while  bonds are outstanding, with annual audits,  independent citizens' oversight, NO money  for salaries and all funds spent locally, be  adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3191, "no_votes": 3039, "total_votes": 6230, "percent_yes": 51.219903691813805, "percent_no": 48.780096308186195, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Red Bluff Union Elementary School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Red Bluff Union Elementary School District to issue $14.1 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, upgrade building systems, and make safety improvements to school facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of approximately 2.3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.287074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.758681", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TEHAMA Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2709, "fingerprint": "2022|202200091|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200091|TRINITY", "content_hash": "95f0afbd1fb3d6c7", "measure_id": "202200091", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TRINITY Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the County of Trinity adopt an ordinance amending section 3.28 of the Trinity County Code by imposing an additional five percent (5%) of the rent charged by the operator as a general tax for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2003, "no_votes": 2457, "total_votes": 4460, "percent_yes": 44.91031390134529, "percent_no": 55.08968609865471, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed an additional 5% tax on hotel room rentals in ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed an additional 5% tax on hotel room rentals in Trinity County, to be collected as general revenue for the county. The tax would have been added to the existing transient occupancy tax structure already in place.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.287392", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.758847", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TRINITY Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2713, "fingerprint": "2022|202200411|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200411|TULARE", "content_hash": "747cc001c8629076", "measure_id": "202200411", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure enacting a ten percent (10%) Transient Occupancy Tax to be paid by hotel guests in the City of Farmersville providing funding for general purposes such as city services, programs, economic development, and capital improvements, which is expected to generate an estimated $185,000 annually per hotel and is effective until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 567, "no_votes": 586, "total_votes": 1153, "percent_yes": 49.17606244579358, "percent_no": 50.82393755420642, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted a 10% transient occupancy tax on hotel guests ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted a 10% transient occupancy tax on hotel guests in Farmersville to fund general city services, programs, economic development, and capital improvements, generating an estimated $185,000 annually per hotel. The tax would have remained in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.288640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.759473", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2712, "fingerprint": "2022|202200410|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200410|TULARE", "content_hash": "23dec6ec3481387f", "measure_id": "202200410", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Voters in California voted to impose state taxes on licenses cannabis businesses. Shall Ordinance No. 706 be enacted, imposing a local general tax on cannabis businesses at a rate not exceeding $25 per square foot (annually adjusted by CPI) or 10% of gross receipts, to maintain public safety and general City services for Exeter residents; generating undetermined revenue until repealed?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1725, "no_votes": 873, "total_votes": 2598, "percent_yes": 66.39722863741339, "percent_no": 33.60277136258661, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacted a local tax on cannabis businesses in Exeter at a rate no...", "summary_text": "The measure enacted a local tax on cannabis businesses in Exeter at a rate not exceeding $25 per square foot (adjusted annually for inflation) or 10% of gross receipts. The tax revenue would be used for public safety and general city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.288352", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.759318", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2710, "fingerprint": "2022|202200565|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200565|TULARE", "content_hash": "6c6e75491f6ef3e5", "measure_id": "202200565", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To expand COS\u2019s University Center providing local, affordable university degrees/career training including nursing, public safety, teaching/education, agriculture/water technology, business, partnering with regional universities; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, including student/veteran/mental health center; shall College of the Sequoias Visalia Area Improvement District No. 2 of the College of the Sequoias Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $95,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $13 per $100,000 assessed valuation, generating $5,400,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring audits, oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26580, "no_votes": 21018, "total_votes": 47598, "percent_yes": 55.842682465649816, "percent_no": 44.157317534350184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes $95 million in bonds for the College of the Sequoias ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes $95 million in bonds for the College of the Sequoias to expand its University Center, construct and repair educational facilities, and build a student/veteran/mental health center. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $13 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $5.4 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.287691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.758996", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2711, "fingerprint": "2022|202200566|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200566|TULARE", "content_hash": "c760db3a1510b50d", "measure_id": "202200566", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund the operational needs of the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District sports facilities and develop a recreation department to promote youth activities including sports, arts, music, and experiences that develop youth into healthy active responsible citizens. Shall the District levy a tax of $48.00 per parcel annually with annual cost of living adjustment, initially raising approximately $234,048 as long as the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District Board oversees the program?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 942, "no_votes": 779, "total_votes": 1721, "percent_yes": 54.735618826263796, "percent_no": 45.264381173736204, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School Distr...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District to levy an annual $48 parcel tax with cost-of-living adjustments to fund sports facilities operations and create a recreation department for youth activities including sports, arts, and music. The tax was projected to raise approximately $234,048 annually under district board oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.288017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.759166", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2715, "fingerprint": "2022|202200568|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200568|TULARE", "content_hash": "7454696eda715506", "measure_id": "202200568", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of educational facilities; modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve technology; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Sundale Union Elementary School District's measure be adopted authorizing $3,800,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $249,600 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 268, "no_votes": 308, "total_votes": 576, "percent_yes": 46.52777777777778, "percent_no": 53.47222222222222, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Sundale Union Elementary School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Sundale Union Elementary School District to issue $3.8 million in bonds to fund facility improvements, classroom construction and modernization, technology upgrades, and health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.289285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.759815", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2716, "fingerprint": "2022|202200569|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200569|TULARE", "content_hash": "7ecf7dbed45e6291", "measure_id": "202200569", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of educational facilities; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and construct a gymnasium for school and community use; shall Sundale Union Elementary School District's measure be adopted authorizing $4,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $262,776 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 253, "no_votes": 324, "total_votes": 577, "percent_yes": 43.84748700173311, "percent_no": 56.15251299826689, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Sundale Union Elementary School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Sundale Union Elementary School District to issue $4 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, and construct a gymnasium. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.289572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.759968", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2717, "fingerprint": "2022|202200412|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200412|TULARE", "content_hash": "b9ee47762770b50b", "measure_id": "202200412", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, address homelessness, roads, and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 10% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 10% for all other cannabis businesses will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8074, "no_votes": 4299, "total_votes": 12373, "percent_yes": 65.25499070556857, "percent_no": 34.745009294431426, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of Tulare to tax cannabis businesses at rate...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of Tulare to tax cannabis businesses at rates up to $10 per square foot annually for cultivation, and up to 10% of gross receipts for retail and other cannabis operations. The tax revenue would fund general municipal services including police, fire, homelessness programs, roads, and recreation until repealed by voters or the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.289879", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.760118", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2714, "fingerprint": "2022|202200567|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200567|TULARE", "content_hash": "c3c69b8a1c0b4cd8", "measure_id": "202200567", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TULARE Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; construct new 21st century classrooms; and make health and safety improvements; shall Farmersville Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $8,600,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $497,300 annually at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?\"", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 870, "no_votes": 395, "total_votes": 1265, "percent_yes": 68.77470355731225, "percent_no": 31.22529644268775, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Farmersville Unified School District to issue $8", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Farmersville Unified School District to issue $8.6 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, construct new classrooms, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.288965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.759659", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TULARE Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2719, "fingerprint": "2022|202200092|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200092|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "87e16d6ce4d3e18e", "measure_id": "202200092", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TUOLUMNE Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect and improve essential Sheriff, Fire, and Road services, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a one percent Transactions and Use Tax (sales tax) in the unincorporated areas of the County providing approximately $6,400,000 annually that exclusively funds and is split between Sheriff (40%), Fire (40%), and Road (20%) services with annual public audits and expiring after 10 years unless renewed by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10018, "no_votes": 10835, "total_votes": 20853, "percent_yes": 48.04104924950847, "percent_no": 51.95895075049153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized a 1% sales tax in unincorporated areas of ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized a 1% sales tax in unincorporated areas of Tuolumne County to generate approximately $6.4 million annually for sheriff services (40%), fire services (40%), and road services (20%), with the tax expiring after 10 years unless renewed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.290540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.760417", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TUOLUMNE Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2718, "fingerprint": "2022|202200413|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200413|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "34aa5eaa955188ae", "measure_id": "202200413", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TUOLUMNE Measure Y", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the measure to maintain the City of Sonora essential services such as Police, Fire, Street Repair, and other core services by establishing a 1 % sales and use tax (\"Sales Tax\"), providing the City of Sonora approximately $3.9 million dollars annually for a period of twenty (20) years until March 31, 2043, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 998, "no_votes": 725, "total_votes": 1723, "percent_yes": 57.922228670922806, "percent_no": 42.077771329077194, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1% sales and use tax in the City of Sonora for twe...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1% sales and use tax in the City of Sonora for twenty years (until March 31, 2043) to fund essential city services including police, fire, street repair, and other core services. The tax is expected to generate approximately $3.9 million annually for the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.290210", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.760265", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TUOLUMNE Measure Y", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2730, "fingerprint": "2022|202200093|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200093|VENTURA", "content_hash": "45b494a04d64a66d", "measure_id": "202200093", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 4567, an ordinance of the County of Ventura repealing and reenacting Division 8, Chapter 1.1, Sections 8175-5.7 of the Ventura County Ordinance Code, to amend the Coastal Zoning Ordinance regulating oil and gas exploration and production, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92590, "no_votes": 102181, "total_votes": 194771, "percent_yes": 47.53787781548588, "percent_no": 52.46212218451412, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Environment: Regulation/Mitigation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended Ventura County's Coastal Zoning Ordinance to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended Ventura County's Coastal Zoning Ordinance to change regulations governing oil and gas exploration and production activities. The measure would have repealed and reenacted existing sections of the county's ordinance code related to these energy operations.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.294601", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.762167", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2731, "fingerprint": "2022|202200094|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200094|VENTURA", "content_hash": "a619bd134c923e07", "measure_id": "202200094", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 4568, an ordinance of the County of Ventura repealing and reenacting Division 8, Chapter 1.1, Sections 8107-5 of the Ventura County Ordinance Code, to amend the Non-Coastal Zoning Ordinance regulating oil and gas exploration and production, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91218, "no_votes": 101942, "total_votes": 193160, "percent_yes": 47.22406295299234, "percent_no": 52.77593704700766, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have repealed and reenacted portions of Ventura County's zo...", "summary_text": "The measure would have repealed and reenacted portions of Ventura County's zoning code that regulate oil and gas exploration and production in non-coastal areas of the county.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.295130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.762320", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2726, "fingerprint": "2022|202200416|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200416|VENTURA", "content_hash": "9c94ab42dba5f5f6", "measure_id": "202200416", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would modify existing term limits on members of the City Council and the Mayor so that those elected officials would be limited to serving two consecutive terms as Mayor and/or Councilmember until at least two years have lapsed from the time that official last served as a member of the City Council or as Mayor?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19072, "no_votes": 15362, "total_votes": 34434, "percent_yes": 55.38711738398094, "percent_no": 44.61288261601906, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure modifies Ventura's existing term limits to restrict the Mayor an...", "summary_text": "This measure modifies Ventura's existing term limits to restrict the Mayor and City Council members to two consecutive terms in either office, with a requirement to wait at least two years after leaving office before running again for either position.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.292937", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.761526", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2728, "fingerprint": "2022|202200417|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200417|VENTURA", "content_hash": "7d24ce26ea86735c", "measure_id": "202200417", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Port Hueneme change its name to the City of Hueneme Beach and amend its Charter to reflect the change of name?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1577, "no_votes": 3495, "total_votes": 5072, "percent_yes": 31.092271293375397, "percent_no": 68.9077287066246, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have changed the name of the City of Port Hueneme t...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have changed the name of the City of Port Hueneme to the City of Hueneme Beach and amended the city charter accordingly.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.293567", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.761849", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2732, "fingerprint": "2022|202200576|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200576|VENTURA", "content_hash": "09fb03d5517cdba0", "measure_id": "202200576", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; and construct, modernize, renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Ventura Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $434,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $23,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26994, "no_votes": 17542, "total_votes": 44536, "percent_yes": 60.61164002155559, "percent_no": 39.38835997844441, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Ventura Unified School District to issue $434,500,000...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Ventura Unified School District to issue $434,500,000 in bonds to repair roofs, improve health and safety systems, and construct or modernize classrooms and school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $23,300,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.295660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.762471", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2720, "fingerprint": "2022|202200570|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200570|VENTURA", "content_hash": "f3ca17989b1a2db4", "measure_id": "202200570", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, physical education facilities, sites, equipment, upgrade electrical wiring for classroom technology, reduce overcrowding, repair older classrooms, facilities, aging infrastructure, without increasing current tax rates, shall Fillmore Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $41,600,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying, on average, 5\u00a2/$100 assessed value ($2,452,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with independent audits, public disclosure of bonds spending, citizen oversight, all funds used locally and not taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3066, "no_votes": 1663, "total_votes": 4729, "percent_yes": 64.83400296045676, "percent_no": 35.16599703954324, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes $41,600,000 in bonds for Fillmore Unified School Distr...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes $41,600,000 in bonds for Fillmore Unified School District to acquire, construct, and repair classrooms, facilities, and infrastructure, including upgrading electrical wiring and reducing overcrowding. The bonds would be funded through a property tax levy averaging 5 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.290865", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.760568", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2729, "fingerprint": "2022|202200575|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200575|VENTURA", "content_hash": "da511490c088a88a", "measure_id": "202200575", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of educational facilities, upgrade, modernize, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and facilities; make health, safety, and security improvements; upgrade technology; provide HVAC; and construct new classrooms and libraries, shall Rio Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted to authorize $72,000,000 of bonds with legal rates, raising on average $4,000,000 per year until repaid, at approximately 2.1\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent oversight, NO money for salaries, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4726, "no_votes": 2843, "total_votes": 7569, "percent_yes": 62.43889549478134, "percent_no": 37.56110450521866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Rio Elementary School District to issue $72 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Rio Elementary School District to issue $72 million in bonds to upgrade and modernize school facilities, including classrooms, restrooms, technology, HVAC systems, and construction of new classrooms and libraries. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 2.1 cents per $100 of assessed property value, generating about $4 million annually until repaid.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.294054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.761997", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2727, "fingerprint": "2022|202200574|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200574|VENTURA", "content_hash": "b5d50738b790c088", "measure_id": "202200574", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To reconstruct older middle schools, modernize and construct elementary classrooms and support facilities, increase teacher and student access to modern classroom technology, and improve student security and safety, shall Oxnard School District\u2019s measure be adopted to issue $215,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, raising on average $10.7 million annually for issued bonds through maturity, with levies projected at 3 cents per $100 assessed valuation, with citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13546, "no_votes": 9965, "total_votes": 23511, "percent_yes": 57.6155841946323, "percent_no": 42.3844158053677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Oxnard School District to issue $215 million in b...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Oxnard School District to issue $215 million in bonds to reconstruct middle schools, modernize elementary facilities, upgrade classroom technology, and improve student safety and security. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies projected at 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens' oversight and annual audits required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.293273", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.761675", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2722, "fingerprint": "2022|202200572|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200572|VENTURA", "content_hash": "4fc396997cf28e17", "measure_id": "202200572", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To construct, renovate, and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and provide new classrooms; shall Mupu Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $49,500 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 0.03 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 178, "no_votes": 67, "total_votes": 245, "percent_yes": 72.6530612244898, "percent_no": 27.346938775510196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes Mupu Elementary School District to issue $800,000 in b...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes Mupu Elementary School District to issue $800,000 in bonds to construct, renovate, and modernize school facilities including classrooms, restrooms, roofs, and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 0.03 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $49,500 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.291675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.760897", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2723, "fingerprint": "2022|202200573|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200573|VENTURA", "content_hash": "120992855a17f438", "measure_id": "202200573", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide healthy, safe, and modern schools by upgrading and renovating classrooms, restrooms and facilities; replacing/fixing deteriorating plumbing/sewer systems, and making security, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Mupu Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $49,500 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 0.03 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 177, "no_votes": 68, "total_votes": 245, "percent_yes": 72.24489795918367, "percent_no": 27.755102040816325, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Mupu Elementary School District to issue $800,000...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Mupu Elementary School District to issue $800,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and restroom upgrades, plumbing repairs, and safety and accessibility enhancements. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 0.03 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.292007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.761061", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2724, "fingerprint": "2022|202200414|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200414|VENTURA", "content_hash": "059abc367c6c189d", "measure_id": "202200414", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the voters amend the Ojai Municipal Code to repeal Measure A and return to five elected city council members and a mayor selected by rotation from among the five elected city council members?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1593, "no_votes": 1876, "total_votes": 3469, "percent_yes": 45.921014701643124, "percent_no": 54.078985298356876, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have repealed a previous measure (Measure A) and changed O...", "summary_text": "This measure would have repealed a previous measure (Measure A) and changed Ojai's city government structure from having a directly elected mayor to having five council members with the mayor selected by rotation among those five members.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.292331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.761228", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2725, "fingerprint": "2022|202200415|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200415|VENTURA", "content_hash": "dbe29042c7a287e8", "measure_id": "202200415", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the voters authorize, at the discretion of the City Council, the use of ranked choice voting, also known as instant runoff voting and allowing voters to rank candidates for elected office in order of preference, to elect City offices at-large, thereby amending the Ojai Municipal Code to no longer elect City Council members by district, if the City Council implements it starting with the November 2024 general election?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1909, "no_votes": 1510, "total_votes": 3419, "percent_yes": 55.8350394852296, "percent_no": 44.1649605147704, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Ojai City Council to implement ranked choice voti...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Ojai City Council to implement ranked choice voting for city elections and changes City Council elections from district-based to at-large, with potential implementation beginning in November 2024.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.292620", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.761376", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2721, "fingerprint": "2022|202200571|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200571|VENTURA", "content_hash": "83e6ee8bd8f6a7a3", "measure_id": "202200571", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities and instructional technology to support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts and skilled trades; improve safety/ security systems; remove asbestos, repair, construct/acquire classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $340,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, without increasing current tax rates, levying $36 per $100,000 assessed value ($23,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 499, "no_votes": 312, "total_votes": 811, "percent_yes": 61.52897657213317, "percent_no": 38.47102342786683, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Las Virgenes Unified School District to issue $340 mi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Las Virgenes Unified School District to issue $340 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities, and instructional technology, as well as improve safety systems and remove asbestos. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $36 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.291368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.760736", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2733, "fingerprint": "2022|202200418|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200418|YOLO", "content_hash": "1009ae42e7bd04fd", "measure_id": "202200418", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall\u00a0Resolution 22-010\u00a0be adopted to approve a mixed-use innovation center with lab and research facilities, offices, market-rate and affordable housing, hotel/conference center, parks, and community sports fields, by amending the City of Davis General Plan to change land use designations for the Davis Innovation and Sustainability Campus 2022 (DiSC 2022) and Mace Triangle properties from Agriculture and Public/Quasi-Public to Innovation Center, Urban Agriculture Transition Area, General Commercial and Public/Semi-Public, and establishing Baseline Project Features?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7199, "no_votes": 12588, "total_votes": 19787, "percent_yes": 36.38247334108253, "percent_no": 63.61752665891747, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have approved a mixed-use development called DiSC 2022 in D...", "summary_text": "The measure would have approved a mixed-use development called DiSC 2022 in Davis by changing the land use designation of agricultural and public land to allow construction of research facilities, offices, housing, a hotel/conference center, and recreational amenities. It would have amended the city's General Plan to reclassify the land from agriculture and public uses to innovation center, commercial, and other designations.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-06-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.296248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.762697", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2735, "fingerprint": "2022|202200419|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200419|YOLO", "content_hash": "feb362801a74bc4f", "measure_id": "202200419", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the salary for City Council members of the City of Woodland be increased from $250 to $500 per month, and in the future be adjusted by City ordinance in accordance with State law?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7110, "no_votes": 10251, "total_votes": 17361, "percent_yes": 40.95386210471747, "percent_no": 59.04613789528253, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have doubled Woodland City Council members' monthly salary...", "summary_text": "This measure would have doubled Woodland City Council members' monthly salary from $250 to $500 and allowed future salary adjustments through city ordinance as permitted by state law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.297191", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.763021", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2736, "fingerprint": "2022|202200420|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200420|YOLO", "content_hash": "8123eecab3c7529e", "measure_id": "202200420", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve City services, such as law enforcement, parks, youth/senior services, and street repair, and for general government use, shall a measure be adopted enacting a tax on cannabis businesses up to 10% of gross receipts, until ended by voters?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11458, "no_votes": 5895, "total_votes": 17353, "percent_yes": 66.02892871549588, "percent_no": 33.97107128450412, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "General Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a tax of up to 10% of gross receipts on cannabis busines...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a tax of up to 10% of gross receipts on cannabis businesses in Yolo, California to fund city services including law enforcement, parks, youth and senior services, and street repair. The tax will remain in effect until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.297940", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.763169", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2734, "fingerprint": "2022|202200577|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200577|YOLO", "content_hash": "d8e13e3f9d11be4f", "measure_id": "202200577", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YOLO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update and expand science, technology, engineering, arts, math classrooms/ labs; improve school safety/ security; replace aging heating, cooling, plumbing systems; improve access for students with disabilities; construct, repair, equip sites/ classrooms, shall the Esparto Unified School District measure authorizing $19,900,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, raising approximately $1,440,000 annually at an estimated $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 972, "no_votes": 908, "total_votes": 1880, "percent_yes": 51.70212765957447, "percent_no": 48.29787234042553, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Esparto Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Esparto Unified School District to issue $19,900,000 in bonds to fund classroom and laboratory improvements, infrastructure updates, safety enhancements, and accessibility improvements across district facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.296725", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.762867", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YOLO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2738, "fingerprint": "2022|202200579|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200579|YUBA", "content_hash": "7a396a5469de8208", "measure_id": "202200579", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To begin construction on a new high school for Plumas Lake students, construct classrooms, restrooms and other necessary high school facilities; shall Wheatland Union High School District (Plumas Lake SFID No.1) issue $16,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $825,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1672, "no_votes": 1269, "total_votes": 2941, "percent_yes": 56.85141108466508, "percent_no": 43.14858891533492, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Wheatland Union High School District to issue $16...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Wheatland Union High School District to issue $16 million in bonds to construct a new high school and related facilities for Plumas Lake students. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, with oversight requirements and restrictions preventing use of funds for salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.298961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.763515", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2739, "fingerprint": "2022|202200580|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200580|YUBA", "content_hash": "87c81b7cbc7fe91a", "measure_id": "202200580", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education at Wheatland High; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety, and security improvements; shall Wheatland Union High School District (SFID No. 2) issue $8,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $495,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 872, "no_votes": 971, "total_votes": 1843, "percent_yes": 47.31416169289203, "percent_no": 52.68583830710797, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Wheatland Union High School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Wheatland Union High School District to issue $8.7 million in bonds to repair roofs, modernize classrooms and facilities, and make health and safety improvements at Wheatland High School. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.299414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.763683", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2737, "fingerprint": "2022|202200578|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2022|202200578|YUBA", "content_hash": "5f239c655772a905", "measure_id": "202200578", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2022, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "YUBA Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain safe, quality education, resolve overcrowding challenges, and retain valued teachers by constructing a new middle school on pre-purchased land with facilities that properly educate middle school students in reading, science, technology, engineering, language arts, and math, shall the Plumas Lake Elementary School District issue $45,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, annually levying approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $1,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with strict accountability including audits and public spending disclosures?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1662, "no_votes": 1282, "total_votes": 2944, "percent_yes": 56.453804347826086, "percent_no": 43.546195652173914, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Plumas Lake Elementary School District ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Plumas Lake Elementary School District to issue $45 million in bonds to construct a new middle school on pre-purchased land. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2022-11-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:51:57.298382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:51:55.763352", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "YUBA Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2740, "fingerprint": "2021|202100001|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100001|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "11e821c33f3091eb", "measure_id": "202100001", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure, specifying that the Special Tax increase of $100/parcel, adopted by voters on May 7, 2019 in the Appaloosa Zone of the ARCSD, apply, without expiration, to the 20 parcels on Pinto and Morgan roads which are currently exempt from the tax, raising an additional $2,000 annually for road maintenance and thus increasing the District's appropriation limit commensurate with the revenue generated by this measure, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57, "no_votes": 8, "total_votes": 65, "percent_yes": 87.6923076923077, "percent_no": 12.307692307692307, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends a $100 per parcel special tax for road maintenance to 20...", "summary_text": "This measure extends a $100 per parcel special tax for road maintenance to 20 previously exempt parcels on Pinto and Morgan roads in the Appaloosa Zone of the ARCSD. The extension would generate an additional $2,000 annually and has no expiration date.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-05-04", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.727517", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.322358", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, specifying that the Special Tax increase of $100/parcel, adopted by voters on May 7, 2019 in the Appaloosa Zone of the ARCSD, apply, without expiration, to the 20 parcels on Pinto and Morgan roads which are currently exempt from the tax, raising an additional $2,000 annually for road maintenance and thus increasing the District's appropriation limit commensurate with the revenue generated by this measure, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2741, "fingerprint": "2021|202100002|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100002|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "697d81dbf4fffb10", "measure_id": "202100002", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall County of Contra Costa Ordinance No. 2021-01 be approved to increase the existing parcel tax on County Service Area P-2 Zone B to annual maximums of $67 per parcel for residential property and $200 per parcel for commercial/industrial/institutional property, to provide additional funding for police protection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2539, "no_votes": 550, "total_votes": 3089, "percent_yes": 82.19488507607639, "percent_no": 17.80511492392361, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased the existing parcel tax in Contra Costa County Service ...", "summary_text": "The measure increased the existing parcel tax in Contra Costa County Service Area P-2 Zone B to annual maximums of $67 for residential parcels and $200 for commercial/industrial/institutional parcels. The additional revenue generated would fund police protection services in the area.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-05-04", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.728163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.322553", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall County of Contra Costa Ordinance No. 2021-01 be approved to increase the existing parcel tax on County Service Area P-2 Zone B to annual maximums of $67 per parcel for residential property and $200 per parcel for commercial/industrial/institutional property, to provide additional funding for police protection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2742, "fingerprint": "2021|202100003|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100003|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "339da1c902209ff6", "measure_id": "202100003", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall\u00a0an\u00a0annual\u00a0special\u00a0tax\u00a0in\u00a0an\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0$550.00\u00a0on\u00a0each\u00a0parcel\u00a0of\u00a0land\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0Blanchard\u00a0Road\u00a0Zone\u00a0of\u00a0Benefit\u00a0commencing\u00a0fiscal\u00a0year\u00a02022/2023\u00a0and\u00a0continuing\u00a0for\u00a0an\u00a0unlimited\u00a0duration,\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0used\u00a0only\u00a0for\u00a0road\u00a0improvements\u00a0and\u00a0maintenance\u00a0services\u00a0and generating\u00a0annual\u00a0revenue\u00a0of\u00a0$6,600,\u00a0be\u00a0adopted\u00a0to\u00a0replace\u00a0the\u00a0current\u00a0benefit\u00a0 assessment\u00a0of\u00a0$280.00?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 20, "percent_yes": 85.0, "percent_no": 15.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure replaces a $280 annual benefit assessment with a $550 annual spe...", "summary_text": "This measure replaces a $280 annual benefit assessment with a $550 annual special tax on each parcel in the Blanchard Road Zone of Benefit to fund road improvements and maintenance. The tax would begin in fiscal year 2022/2023 and continue indefinitely, generating approximately $6,600 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.728617", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.322735", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall\u00a0an\u00a0annual\u00a0special\u00a0tax\u00a0in\u00a0an\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0$550.00\u00a0on\u00a0each\u00a0parcel\u00a0of\u00a0land\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0Blanchard\u00a0Road\u00a0Zone\u00a0of\u00a0Benefit\u00a0commencing\u00a0fiscal\u00a0year\u00a02022/2023\u00a0and\u00a0continuing\u00a0for\u00a0an\u00a0unlimited\u00a0duration,\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0used\u00a0only\u00a0for\u00a0road\u00a0improvements\u00a0and\u00a0maintenance\u00a0services\u00a0and generating\u00a0annual\u00a0revenue\u00a0of\u00a0$6,600,\u00a0be\u00a0adopted\u00a0to\u00a0replace\u00a0the\u00a0current\u00a0benefit\u00a0 assessment\u00a0of\u00a0$280.00?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2743, "fingerprint": "2021|202100004|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100004|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "88d477365a729684", "measure_id": "202100004", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure authorizing the Board of Directors of the Marble Mountain Community  Services District (MMCSD) to annually assess each parcel located within the MMCSD  along Marble Ridge Road and Diablo Trail, but not within Road Improvement Zone \"1\", a  special tax in an amount up to, but not exceeding the amount of $400 annually until  rescinded, per parcel, to be expended for the maintenance and improvement of Marble Ridge Road and Diablo Trail be adopted? The maximum revenue to MMCSD would be $10,000 per year.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13, "no_votes": 15, "total_votes": 28, "percent_yes": 46.42857142857143, "percent_no": 53.57142857142857, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Marble Mountain Community Services Dis...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Marble Mountain Community Services District to impose an annual special tax of up to $400 per parcel on properties along Marble Ridge Road and Diablo Trail (excluding those in Road Improvement Zone \"1\") to fund road maintenance and improvements. The tax would have generated a maximum of $10,000 annually for the district until rescinded.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.729059", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.322926", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure authorizing the Board of Directors of the Marble Mountain Community  Services District (MMCSD) to annually assess each parcel located within the MMCSD  along Marble Ridge Road and Diablo Trail, but not within Road Improvement Zone \"1\", a  special tax in an amount up to, but not exceeding the amount of $400 annually until  rescinded, per parcel, to be expended for the maintenance and improvement of Marble Ridge Road and Diablo Trail be adopted? The maximum revenue to MMCSD would be $10,000 per year.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2745, "fingerprint": "2021|202100011|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100011|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b81080e2ef963673", "measure_id": "202100011", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Sunset Clause or expiration date set by Section 3.25.070 of the Parlier Municipal Code enacting a Parcel Tax to pay only for the operations of the Parlier Police Department in providing necessary public safety services for the City of Parlier be repealed so that the Parcel Tax adopted by the voters is extended?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 341, "no_votes": 155, "total_votes": 496, "percent_yes": 68.75, "percent_no": 31.25, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure repealed the sunset clause on an existing parcel tax that funds ...", "summary_text": "This measure repealed the sunset clause on an existing parcel tax that funds the Parlier Police Department's operations, effectively extending the tax indefinitely rather than allowing it to expire.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-06-08", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.730092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.323294", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sunset Clause or expiration date set by Section 3.25.070 of the Parlier Municipal Code enacting a Parcel Tax to pay only for the operations of the Parlier Police Department in providing necessary public safety services for the City of Parlier be repealed so that the Parcel Tax adopted by the voters is extended?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2744, "fingerprint": "2021|202100010|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100010|FRESNO", "content_hash": "86113d6e8031ed4a", "measure_id": "202100010", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure be adopted to improve local police/fire services, emergency response times; maintain the number of police officers; fight crime/gangs/drugs, provide firefighting equipment; establish an annual special tax, as follows: $36 parcel tax for each single-family residential and agricultural parcel; $25 each multifamily unit; $180 each commercial parcel; $275 each industrial parcel, raising about $98,000 annually for four years, with independent Citizen Oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 190, "no_votes": 118, "total_votes": 308, "percent_yes": 61.68831168831169, "percent_no": 38.31168831168831, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established an annual special tax on different types ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established an annual special tax on different types of property parcels in Fresno for four years, with rates ranging from $25 to $275 depending on property type, to raise approximately $98,000 annually for police and fire services. The measure failed despite receiving 61.7% yes votes, likely because it required a two-thirds supermajority to pass as a special tax.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-03-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.729639", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.323111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure be adopted to improve local police/fire services, emergency response times; maintain the number of police officers; fight crime/gangs/drugs, provide firefighting equipment; establish an annual special tax, as follows: $36 parcel tax for each single-family residential and agricultural parcel; $25 each multifamily unit; $180 each commercial parcel; $275 each industrial parcel, raising about $98,000 annually for four years, with independent Citizen Oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2746, "fingerprint": "2021|202100012|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100012|FRESNO", "content_hash": "7b2100afbf132676", "measure_id": "202100012", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Orange Cove's measure increasing the utility users tax on gas, electricity, and telephone from seven to ten percent and initiating a use tax on water use at ten percent to raise an estimated $346,832 annually in perpetuity, with citizen oversight, to maintain and not have to cut or lose general city services like police officers, park facilities, job creation, job training, recreational activities, and other city services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 157, "no_votes": 337, "total_votes": 494, "percent_yes": 31.781376518218615, "percent_no": 68.21862348178138, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased Orange Cove's utility tax on gas, electricit...", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased Orange Cove's utility tax on gas, electricity, and telephone services from 7% to 10% and established a new 10% tax on water use. The tax increases were estimated to generate $346,832 annually to fund general city services including police, parks, and recreational programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.730531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.323926", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Orange Cove's measure increasing the utility users tax on gas, electricity, and telephone from seven to ten percent and initiating a use tax on water use at ten percent to raise an estimated $346,832 annually in perpetuity, with citizen oversight, to maintain and not have to cut or lose general city services like police officers, park facilities, job creation, job training, recreational activities, and other city services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2747, "fingerprint": "2021|202100013|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100013|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "7805511b8a906989", "measure_id": "202100013", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Brawley (\u201cCity\u201d) adopt an ordinance extending the Utility Users\u2019 Tax until otherwise repealed by voters at a rate of 4%, which is less than surrounding municipalities, upon the use of telecommunications services, natural gas, water, sewer, and solid waste to maintain city services, including, but not limited to, police, fire, City administration services, library, parks, recreation, and senior center, which is projected to raise approximately $2.5 million per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1339, "no_votes": 1106, "total_votes": 2445, "percent_yes": 54.76482617586912, "percent_no": 45.23517382413088, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure extended Brawley's Utility Users' Tax at a 4% rate on telecommuni...", "summary_text": "The measure extended Brawley's Utility Users' Tax at a 4% rate on telecommunications, natural gas, water, sewer, and solid waste services to fund city services including police, fire, administration, library, parks, recreation, and senior center. The tax is projected to generate approximately $2.5 million annually and remains in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.730965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.324311", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Brawley (\u201cCity\u201d) adopt an ordinance extending the Utility Users\u2019 Tax until otherwise repealed by voters at a rate of 4%, which is less than surrounding municipalities, upon the use of telecommunications services, natural gas, water, sewer, and solid waste to maintain city services, including, but not limited to, police, fire, City administration services, library, parks, recreation, and senior center, which is projected to raise approximately $2.5 million per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2748, "fingerprint": "2021|202100014|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100014|KERN", "content_hash": "11bcf34e4cf48d55", "measure_id": "202100014", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect Taft' s long-term financial stability; maintain police/fire/ emergency response times; number of police officers/firefighters; repair streets/potholes; keep public areas clean/ safe; help address homelessness; retain local businesses/jobs, other general City services; shall the measure be adopted establishing a 10 sales tax providing approximately $ 1,600,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring public disclosure of spending, audits, all revenues benefiting Taft residents/ no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 623, "no_votes": 189, "total_votes": 812, "percent_yes": 76.72413793103449, "percent_no": 23.27586206896551, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1% sales tax in Taft, California, generating appro...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1% sales tax in Taft, California, generating approximately $1.6 million annually for general city services including police, fire, street repairs, and addressing homelessness. The tax continues until ended by voters and requires public disclosure of spending and audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.731250", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.324532", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect Taft' s long-term financial stability; maintain police/fire/ emergency response times; number of police officers/firefighters; repair streets/potholes; keep public areas clean/ safe; help address homelessness; retain local businesses/jobs, other general City services; shall the measure be adopted establishing a 10 sales tax providing approximately $ 1,600,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring public disclosure of spending, audits, all revenues benefiting Taft residents/ no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11077, "fingerprint": "2021|202100017|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100017|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8a8abac28a8a3278", "measure_id": "202100017", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall William Davis be recalled (removed) from the office of City of Vernon Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15, "no_votes": 59, "total_votes": 74, "percent_yes": 20.27027027027027, "percent_no": 79.72972972972973, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have removed William Davis from his position as a C...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have removed William Davis from his position as a City Council Member in Vernon, California. The recall effort failed with only 20.3% of voters supporting his removal.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-09-14", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.341467", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.732067", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.325095", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall William Davis be recalled (removed) from the office of City of Vernon Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2749, "fingerprint": "2021|202100015|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100015|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "40b93deab0a2d7f2", "measure_id": "202100015", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Diana Gonzales be recalled (removed) from the office of City of Vernon Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56, "no_votes": 25, "total_votes": 81, "percent_yes": 69.1358024691358, "percent_no": 30.864197530864203, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would remove Diana Gonzales from her position as a City of Verno...", "summary_text": "This measure would remove Diana Gonzales from her position as a City of Vernon Council Member. The recall passed with 69.1% of voters supporting her removal from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-06-01", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.731525", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.324721", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Diana Gonzales be recalled (removed) from the office of City of Vernon Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11078, "fingerprint": "2021|202100018|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100018|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c23351acfa164535", "measure_id": "202100018", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Melissa Ybarra be recalled (removed) from the office of City of Vernon Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19, "no_votes": 56, "total_votes": 75, "percent_yes": 25.33333333333333, "percent_no": 74.66666666666667, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to remove Melissa Ybarra from her position ...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to remove Melissa Ybarra from her position as a City of Vernon Council Member. The recall failed, with only 25.3% of voters supporting her removal.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-09-14", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.341670", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.734308", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.325281", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Melissa Ybarra be recalled (removed) from the office of City of Vernon Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2750, "fingerprint": "2021|202100016|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100016|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "998803e355feb007", "measure_id": "202100016", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Carol Menke be recalled (removed) from the office of City of Vernon Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59, "no_votes": 22, "total_votes": 81, "percent_yes": 72.8395061728395, "percent_no": 27.160493827160494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Carol Menke from her position as ...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Carol Menke from her position as a City of Vernon Council Member. The measure passed, resulting in Menke's removal from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-06-01", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.731797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.324909", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Carol Menke be recalled (removed) from the office of City of Vernon Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2756, "fingerprint": "2021|202100035|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100035|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d4ce77c7c2f1fc09", "measure_id": "202100035", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall a proposal transferring certain territory (see attached map) from the Lawndale School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District to the Wiseburn Unified School District, be adopted? This proposal constitutes a reorganization of these three school districts pursuant to Education Code \u00a7 35762 and Elections Code \u00a7 13319.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 351, "no_votes": 19, "total_votes": 370, "percent_yes": 94.86486486486486, "percent_no": 5.135135135135144, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure transferred specific territory from the Lawndale School District...", "summary_text": "This measure transferred specific territory from the Lawndale School District and Centinela Valley Union High School District to the Wiseburn Unified School District. The transfer constituted a reorganization of the three school districts under California education law.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-03-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.740013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.326424", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a proposal transferring certain territory (see attached map) from the Lawndale School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District to the Wiseburn Unified School District, be adopted? This proposal constitutes a reorganization of these three school districts pursuant to Education Code \u00a7 35762 and Elections Code \u00a7 13319.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11079, "fingerprint": "2021|202100036|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100036|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c8a0eb35aec0969b", "measure_id": "202100036", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect the quality of education and continue San Marino's tradition of community support for local schools, by retaining highly qualified teachers, continue funding advanced programs in math, science, engineering, technology, provide honors and advanced placement classes, and maintain class sizes, shall the San Marino Unified School District measure to renew its expiring $968 education parcel tax for six years be adopted, raising approximately $4 million annually, with annual inflation adjustments, exemptions for seniors and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3530, "no_votes": 1257, "total_votes": 4787, "percent_yes": 73.74138291205348, "percent_no": 26.25861708794652, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure renewed San Marino Unified School District's expiring $968 annual...", "summary_text": "The measure renewed San Marino Unified School District's expiring $968 annual parcel tax for six years with inflation adjustments, raising approximately $4 million annually for educational programs and services. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and all revenue stays within the local school district.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-06-29", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.343461", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.740424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.326615", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of education and continue San Marino's tradition of community support for local schools, by retaining highly qualified teachers, continue funding advanced programs in math, science, engineering, technology, provide honors and advanced placement classes, and maintain class sizes, shall the San Marino Unified School District measure to renew its expiring $968 education parcel tax for six years be adopted, raising approximately $4 million annually, with annual inflation adjustments, exemptions for seniors and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2755, "fingerprint": "2021|202100034|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100034|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "02492ca10265dda4", "measure_id": "202100034", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue San Marino\u2019s tradition of community support for local schools, to retain outstanding classroom teachers and continue advanced programs in math, science, engineering, technology, provide honors and advanced placement classes, and to minimize class size increases, shall San Marino Unified School District continue to levy a $968 education parcel tax, with exemptions for seniors, raising approximately $4 million annually, to be assessed in each fiscal year with annual inflation adjustments until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2192, "no_votes": 1285, "total_votes": 3477, "percent_yes": 63.04285303422491, "percent_no": 36.95714696577509, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have continued a $968 annual parcel tax on properties with...", "summary_text": "This measure would have continued a $968 annual parcel tax on properties within the San Marino Unified School District to fund educational programs and teacher retention, with exemptions for senior citizens and annual inflation adjustments. The tax would have raised approximately $4 million annually until terminated by future voter action.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-03-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.739362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.326220", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue San Marino\u2019s tradition of community support for local schools, to retain outstanding classroom teachers and continue advanced programs in math, science, engineering, technology, provide honors and advanced placement classes, and to minimize class size increases, shall San Marino Unified School District continue to levy a $968 education parcel tax, with exemptions for seniors, raising approximately $4 million annually, to be assessed in each fiscal year with annual inflation adjustments until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2751, "fingerprint": "2021|202100019|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100019|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dabe0857bbeda9d6", "measure_id": "202100019", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that proposes to amend the Alhambra City Charter to remove all reference to the Alhambra Unified School District (\"AUSD\") from the Charter so that AUSD elections may be conducted consistent with the requirements of the State Education Code and State Elections Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5905, "no_votes": 1290, "total_votes": 7195, "percent_yes": 82.07088255733149, "percent_no": 17.929117442668513, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure removes all references to the Alhambra Unified School District f...", "summary_text": "This measure removes all references to the Alhambra Unified School District from the Alhambra City Charter, allowing school district elections to be conducted according to state education and election codes rather than city charter requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.735461", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.325467", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that proposes to amend the Alhambra City Charter to remove all reference to the Alhambra Unified School District (\"AUSD\") from the Charter so that AUSD elections may be conducted consistent with the requirements of the State Education Code and State Elections Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2753, "fingerprint": "2021|202100021|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100021|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d0520ffe748e6053", "measure_id": "202100021", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential community services, keep public areas safe/clean, retain local businesses/jobs, address traffic near sports/entertainment facilities, increase affordable housing, maintain youth/anti-gang programs, senior services, and other general City services, shall the measure increasing the transient occupancy tax paid only by hotel/motel guests from 14% to 15.5% providing an estimated $730,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6192, "no_votes": 3759, "total_votes": 9951, "percent_yes": 62.2249020198975, "percent_no": 37.7750979801025, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased the transient occupancy tax on hotel and mo...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased the transient occupancy tax on hotel and motel guests in Los Angeles from 14% to 15.5%, generating an estimated $730,000 annually for general city services including public safety, affordable housing, youth programs, and senior services. The measure failed despite receiving 62.2% yes votes, likely because it required a supermajority to pass.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.738051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.325851", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential community services, keep public areas safe/clean, retain local businesses/jobs, address traffic near sports/entertainment facilities, increase affordable housing, maintain youth/anti-gang programs, senior services, and other general City services, shall the measure increasing the transient occupancy tax paid only by hotel/motel guests from 14% to 15.5% providing an estimated $730,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2754, "fingerprint": "2021|202100022|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100022|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3bfa9f234d171aad", "measure_id": "202100022", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to maintain emergency response, paramedics, fire protection, public safety/health, address homelessness, ease traffic, provide general services by increasing the tax on sales of real estate to 4.5% on amounts over $10,000,000, 3.5% on amounts between $2,500,000.01-$10,000,000, 1.75% on amounts between $1,100,000.01-$2,500,000, keeping the existing 0.055% rate for sales under $1,100,000.01 providing $3,500,000 annually until ended by voters, with required public disclosure, audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4736, "no_votes": 5232, "total_votes": 9968, "percent_yes": 47.51203852327448, "percent_no": 52.48796147672552, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased Los Angeles's real estate transfer tax to a ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased Los Angeles's real estate transfer tax to a tiered structure ranging from 1.75% on sales over $1.1 million up to 4.5% on sales over $10 million, while keeping the existing 0.055% rate for sales under $1.1 million. The measure was projected to generate $3.5 billion annually to fund city services including emergency response, public safety, homelessness programs, and traffic improvements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.738866", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.326037", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to maintain emergency response, paramedics, fire protection, public safety/health, address homelessness, ease traffic, provide general services by increasing the tax on sales of real estate to 4.5% on amounts over $10,000,000, 3.5% on amounts between $2,500,000.01-$10,000,000, 1.75% on amounts between $1,100,000.01-$2,500,000, keeping the existing 0.055% rate for sales under $1,100,000.01 providing $3,500,000 annually until ended by voters, with required public disclosure, audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2752, "fingerprint": "2021|202100020|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100020|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6b99c118fc84c2f3", "measure_id": "202100020", "measure_letter": "PS", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect vital public safety emergency services, including police, paramedic and fire protection to maintain 9-1-1 response times and the number of firefighters and police officers, shall the City of Commerce enact a parcel tax on industrial property at a maximum rate of $0.3321 per square foot providing approximately $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters; with committee oversight? All funds will remain in Commerce.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 578, "no_votes": 406, "total_votes": 984, "percent_yes": 58.73983739837399, "percent_no": 41.26016260162601, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted a parcel tax on industrial property in the Cit...", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted a parcel tax on industrial property in the City of Commerce at a maximum rate of $0.3321 per square foot to fund public safety services including police, fire, and paramedic services. The tax would have generated approximately $12 million annually with committee oversight until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.737174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.325663", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect vital public safety emergency services, including police, paramedic and fire protection to maintain 9-1-1 response times and the number of firefighters and police officers, shall the City of Commerce enact a parcel tax on industrial property at a maximum rate of $0.3321 per square foot providing approximately $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters; with committee oversight? All funds will remain in Commerce.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2757, "fingerprint": "2021|202100005|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100005|MARIN", "content_hash": "eca5204e0f4af2fc", "measure_id": "202100005", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ridgewood Avenue Permanent Road Division impose an immediate special tax on parcels within the Division of $1,620 per parcel per year for 10 years beginning Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and thereafter assess on all parcels $200 per year for ongoing maintenance, with a provision for an annual increase effective July 1 in accordance with the change in the State of California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the previous calendar year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36, "no_votes": 8, "total_votes": 44, "percent_yes": 81.81818181818183, "percent_no": 18.181818181818173, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposes a special tax on parcels within Ridgewood Avenue Permane...", "summary_text": "This measure imposes a special tax on parcels within Ridgewood Avenue Permanent Road Division of $1,620 per parcel annually for 10 years starting in fiscal year 2021-2022, followed by an ongoing $200 annual assessment for maintenance with annual Consumer Price Index adjustments.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-03-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.740710", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.326798", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ridgewood Avenue Permanent Road Division impose an immediate special tax on parcels within the Division of $1,620 per parcel per year for 10 years beginning Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and thereafter assess on all parcels $200 per year for ongoing maintenance, with a provision for an annual increase effective July 1 in accordance with the change in the State of California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the previous calendar year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2759, "fingerprint": "2021|202100038|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100038|MARIN", "content_hash": "8b9757a1f43963c7", "measure_id": "202100038", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education at San Rafael high schools by maintaining stable local funding the State can\u2019t take away, including: enhancing core academic programs like math, science, technology, music/art; maintaining small class sizes; prepare students for college/careers; and attracting/retaining high quality teachers, shall the San Rafael City High School District measure renewing funding at the current $196 rate and adding $36 per parcel, be adopted, providing $5,400,000 annually for 8 years with senior exemptions, annual adjustments/independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10775, "no_votes": 4717, "total_votes": 15492, "percent_yes": 69.55202685256907, "percent_no": 30.44797314743093, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews existing funding at $196 per parcel and adds $36 per parc...", "summary_text": "This measure renews existing funding at $196 per parcel and adds $36 per parcel for the San Rafael City High School District, generating $5.4 million annually for 8 years to support academic programs, maintain class sizes, and retain teachers. The measure includes senior exemptions and provides for annual adjustments and independent oversight.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-05-04", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.741276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.327170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education at San Rafael high schools by maintaining stable local funding the State can\u2019t take away, including: enhancing core academic programs like math, science, technology, music/art; maintaining small class sizes; prepare students for college/careers; and attracting/retaining high quality teachers, shall the San Rafael City High School District measure renewing funding at the current $196 rate and adding $36 per parcel, be adopted, providing $5,400,000 annually for 8 years with senior exemptions, annual adjustments/independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2758, "fingerprint": "2021|202100037|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100037|MARIN", "content_hash": "dbc0082d9a2c28c0", "measure_id": "202100037", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education at all San Rafael elementary and middle schools by maintaining stable local funding the State can\u2019t take away, including: enhancing core academic programs like math, science, technology, music and art; maintaining small class sizes; and attracting/retaining high quality teachers, shall the San Rafael City Elementary School District measure renewing funding at the current $287 rate and adding $36 per parcel, be adopted, providing $5,000,000 annually for 8 years with senior exemptions, annual adjustments and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6626, "no_votes": 3065, "total_votes": 9691, "percent_yes": 68.37271695387473, "percent_no": 31.62728304612527, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing parcel tax at $287 per parcel and added $36 ...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing parcel tax at $287 per parcel and added $36 per parcel for the San Rafael City Elementary School District, generating $5 million annually for 8 years to fund educational programs, maintain class sizes, and support teacher retention. The tax includes exemptions for seniors, annual adjustments, and independent oversight.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-05-04", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.740994", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.326978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education at all San Rafael elementary and middle schools by maintaining stable local funding the State can\u2019t take away, including: enhancing core academic programs like math, science, technology, music and art; maintaining small class sizes; and attracting/retaining high quality teachers, shall the San Rafael City Elementary School District measure renewing funding at the current $287 rate and adding $36 per parcel, be adopted, providing $5,000,000 annually for 8 years with senior exemptions, annual adjustments and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2760, "fingerprint": "2021|202100006|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100006|PLACER", "content_hash": "a218c497f0ea1bd3", "measure_id": "202100006", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve local wildfire prevention by removing dry brush, dead trees, and fire hazards, improving evacuation routes, adding firebreaks to prevent the spread of wildfire, and providing homeowners with easy, inexpensive green waste disposal options, shall the Northstar Community Services District measure levying up to $219 per year for 10 years be adopted, providing $450,000 annually in locally-controlled funding to the Northstar Fire Department for fire protection, with annual adjustments, exemptions for low-income residents, and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 109, "no_votes": 16, "total_votes": 125, "percent_yes": 87.2, "percent_no": 12.799999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Northstar Community Services District to levy up ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Northstar Community Services District to levy up to $219 per year for 10 years to fund wildfire prevention activities and provide $450,000 annually to the Northstar Fire Department. The funding would support removing fire hazards, improving evacuation routes, creating firebreaks, and offering green waste disposal options, with provisions for low-income exemptions and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.741551", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.327450", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local wildfire prevention by removing dry brush, dead trees, and fire hazards, improving evacuation routes, adding firebreaks to prevent the spread of wildfire, and providing homeowners with easy, inexpensive green waste disposal options, shall the Northstar Community Services District measure levying up to $219 per year for 10 years be adopted, providing $450,000 annually in locally-controlled funding to the Northstar Fire Department for fire protection, with annual adjustments, exemptions for low-income residents, and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2761, "fingerprint": "2021|202100007|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100007|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "ac1dac4d708a5a7a", "measure_id": "202100007", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Long Valley Community Services District of Plumas County be authorized to adopt an increase in the District's existing special tax for the sole purpose of funding the costs of providing fire protection and prevention, rescue services and emergency medical first response to the residents of the District, which increase shall be levied annually at a rate of $170 for each taxable parcel of real property within the Long Valley Community Services District, and which will increase annually by an amount not to exceed 2%, with the annual proceeds from said increased tax in the estimated amount of $ 39,780 to be used solely for purposes stated herein and as authorized by state and county laws governing the Long Valley Community Services District, subject to the following: (1) the proposed special tax increase will become effective beginning fiscal year 2022-23 and (2) the proposed increased special tax will be levied and collected in the same manner as Plumas County property taxes, with the proceeds to be deposited into a special account for the benefit of the District with the Plumas County Auditor's office; and (3) the proposed special tax increase officer for the District detailing the amounts of tax proceeds collected and expended as required by Government Code Sections 50075.1 and 50075.3; and (4) the duration of the proposed increase in the special tax shall be indefinite until modified or repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 106, "no_votes": 23, "total_votes": 129, "percent_yes": 82.17054263565892, "percent_no": 17.82945736434108, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Long Valley Community Services District to increa...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Long Valley Community Services District to increase its special tax by $170 per taxable parcel annually to fund fire protection, rescue services, and emergency medical first response, with the tax increasing up to 2% each year. The tax increase was set to begin in fiscal year 2022-23 and continue indefinitely until modified or repealed.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.741994", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.327642", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Long Valley Community Services District of Plumas County be authorized to adopt an increase in the District's existing special tax for the sole purpose of funding the costs of providing fire protection and prevention, rescue services and emergency medical first response to the residents of the District, which increase shall be levied annually at a rate of $170 for each taxable parcel of real property within the Long Valley Community Services District, and which will increase annually by an amount not to exceed 2%, with the annual proceeds from said increased tax in the estimated amount of $ 39,780 to be used solely for purposes stated herein and as authorized by state and county laws governing the Long Valley Community Services District, subject to the following: (1) the proposed special tax increase will become effective beginning fiscal year 2022-23 and (2) the proposed increased special tax will be levied and collected in the same manner as Plumas County property taxes, with the proceeds to be deposited into a special account for the benefit of the District with the Plumas County Auditor's office; and (3) the proposed special tax increase officer for the District detailing the amounts of tax proceeds collected and expended as required by Government Code Sections 50075.1 and 50075.3; and (4) the duration of the proposed increase in the special tax shall be indefinite until modified or repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2763, "fingerprint": "2021|202100024|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100024|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8800a0c30ebfef8f", "measure_id": "202100024", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adjusting the City of Eastvale\u2019s appropriations limit be adopted to allow increased budgeting of City revenues for general governmental purposes, including COVID response, fire/emergency medical protection, law enforcement, and street safety/repair for four years (This measure doesn\u2019t increase taxes or impose a new tax.)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4453, "no_votes": 994, "total_votes": 5447, "percent_yes": 81.75142280154213, "percent_no": 18.248577198457866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adjusts the City of Eastvale's appropriations limit to allow inc...", "summary_text": "This measure adjusts the City of Eastvale's appropriations limit to allow increased budgeting of city revenues for general governmental purposes including COVID response, emergency services, law enforcement, and street maintenance for four years. The measure does not increase or impose any taxes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-03-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.742559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.328022", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adjusting the City of Eastvale\u2019s appropriations limit be adopted to allow increased budgeting of City revenues for general governmental purposes, including COVID response, fire/emergency medical protection, law enforcement, and street safety/repair for four years (This measure doesn\u2019t increase taxes or impose a new tax.)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2762, "fingerprint": "2021|202100023|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100023|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "6a84a93edcc2a8cd", "measure_id": "202100023", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall\u00a0Sections\u00a01\u00a0and\u00a03\u00a0of\u00a0Ordinance\u00a0842,\u00a0adopted\u00a0unanimously\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0City\u00a0Council\u00a0to\u00a0address\u00a0residents\u2019\u00a0concerns\u00a0such\u00a0as\u00a0community\u00a0safety,\u00a0neighborhood\u00a0character,\u00a0noise,\u00a0criminal\u00a0activity,\u00a0and\u00a0other impacts\u00a0caused\u00a0by\u00a0short-term\u00a0vacation\u00a0rentals\u00a0operating\u00a0in\u00a0Cathedral\u00a0City,\u00a0by\u00a0establishing\u00a0additional\u00a0regulations\u00a0on\u00a0short-term\u00a0vacation\u00a0 rentals,\u00a0and\u00a0phasing\u00a0out\u00a0short-term\u00a0vacation\u00a0rentals\u00a0except\u00a0where\u00a0approved\u00a0by\u00a0local\u00a0homeowners\u00a0associations,\u00a0become\u00a0law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5006, "no_votes": 2940, "total_votes": 7946, "percent_yes": 63.00025169896804, "percent_no": 36.99974830103196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established additional regulations on short-term vacation rental...", "summary_text": "This measure established additional regulations on short-term vacation rentals in Cathedral City and phases them out except in areas where local homeowners associations approve them. The ordinance was designed to address concerns about community safety, neighborhood character, noise, and criminal activity related to vacation rental properties.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-03-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.742279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.327828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall\u00a0Sections\u00a01\u00a0and\u00a03\u00a0of\u00a0Ordinance\u00a0842,\u00a0adopted\u00a0unanimously\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0City\u00a0Council\u00a0to\u00a0address\u00a0residents\u2019\u00a0concerns\u00a0such\u00a0as\u00a0community\u00a0safety,\u00a0neighborhood\u00a0character,\u00a0noise,\u00a0criminal\u00a0activity,\u00a0and\u00a0other impacts\u00a0caused\u00a0by\u00a0short-term\u00a0vacation\u00a0rentals\u00a0operating\u00a0in\u00a0Cathedral\u00a0City,\u00a0by\u00a0establishing\u00a0additional\u00a0regulations\u00a0on\u00a0short-term\u00a0vacation\u00a0 rentals,\u00a0and\u00a0phasing\u00a0out\u00a0short-term\u00a0vacation\u00a0rentals\u00a0except\u00a0where\u00a0approved\u00a0by\u00a0local\u00a0homeowners\u00a0associations,\u00a0become\u00a0law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2766, "fingerprint": "2021|202100027|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100027|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "74959d80d6100313", "measure_id": "202100027", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain such general city services as 911 response, fire, paramedic, police, street repairs, parks, senior services; address homelessness; shall the measure amending City of Riverside' s Charter to continue collecting in electric rates and maintain the voter-approved fund transfer (established 1968), limited to 11.5% of gross revenue, providing approximately $ 40,000,000 annually to City of Riverside' s General Fund not increasing fax or utility rates, until ended by voters, requiring audits/ all funds controlled locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16127, "no_votes": 13455, "total_votes": 29582, "percent_yes": 54.51625988776959, "percent_no": 45.48374011223041, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Riverside's city charter to continue collecting up to 11", "summary_text": "This measure amended Riverside's city charter to continue collecting up to 11.5% of electric utility gross revenue (approximately $40 million annually) for transfer to the city's general fund to support general city services. The transfer mechanism was originally established in 1968 and required voter reauthorization to continue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.743539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.328586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain such general city services as 911 response, fire, paramedic, police, street repairs, parks, senior services; address homelessness; shall the measure amending City of Riverside' s Charter to continue collecting in electric rates and maintain the voter-approved fund transfer (established 1968), limited to 11.5% of gross revenue, providing approximately $ 40,000,000 annually to City of Riverside' s General Fund not increasing fax or utility rates, until ended by voters, requiring audits/ all funds controlled locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2764, "fingerprint": "2021|202100025|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100025|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "bcec4eb5a7d093e6", "measure_id": "202100025", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance to preserve paramedic and fire protection, 911 response; police gang/drug enforcement programs/neighborhood patrols; address homelessness, protect water quality/delivery; fix streets/potholes; other city services by extending the City's existing 1\u00a2 sales tax until ended by voters, without increasing the tax, providing approximately $12,000,000 annually, continuing citizens' oversight, annual audits,\u00a0prohibiting\u00a0state\u00a0government\u00a0from\u00a0taking\u00a0funds\u00a0raised\u00a0be\u00a0adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6890, "no_votes": 2758, "total_votes": 9648, "percent_yes": 71.41376451077943, "percent_no": 28.58623548922057, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Riverside's existing 1-cent sales tax indefinitely until...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Riverside's existing 1-cent sales tax indefinitely until ended by voters, generating approximately $12 million annually for city services including fire protection, police programs, homeless services, street repairs, and water quality improvements. The measure does not increase the current tax rate and includes provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.742975", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.328209", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance to preserve paramedic and fire protection, 911 response; police gang/drug enforcement programs/neighborhood patrols; address homelessness, protect water quality/delivery; fix streets/potholes; other city services by extending the City's existing 1\u00a2 sales tax until ended by voters, without increasing the tax, providing approximately $12,000,000 annually, continuing citizens' oversight, annual audits,\u00a0prohibiting\u00a0state\u00a0government\u00a0from\u00a0taking\u00a0funds\u00a0raised\u00a0be\u00a0adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2765, "fingerprint": "2021|202100026|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100026|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "558a783dae172cac", "measure_id": "202100026", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, robbery/burglary prevention, neighborhood police patrols/fire engine service levels; address homelessness, repair potholes/streets; keep public areas safe/clean; help retain local businesses; maintain senior services, youth/afterschool programs, other general services by establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax, generating approximately $20,000,000 annually until ended by voters, with independent financial audits, public review of expenditures, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7471, "no_votes": 6398, "total_votes": 13869, "percent_yes": 53.86833946210974, "percent_no": 46.13166053789026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Riverside, California to fund ...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Riverside, California to fund various city services including emergency response, police and fire services, street repairs, homelessness programs, and other general municipal services. The tax generates approximately $20 million annually and includes provisions for independent audits and public expenditure review.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.743254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.328398", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, robbery/burglary prevention, neighborhood police patrols/fire engine service levels; address homelessness, repair potholes/streets; keep public areas safe/clean; help retain local businesses; maintain senior services, youth/afterschool programs, other general services by establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax, generating approximately $20,000,000 annually until ended by voters, with independent financial audits, public review of expenditures, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2767, "fingerprint": "2021|202100028|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100028|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "acd7f48f2583faa8", "measure_id": "202100028", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to support the operation of the City of Isleton\u2019s fire protection needs, by establishing a one-half (\u00bd) percent transactions and use tax for a period of five (5) years commencing on April 1, 2022, that is projected to provide between $83,726.06 and $106,858.02 of revenue annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89, "no_votes": 33, "total_votes": 122, "percent_yes": 72.95081967213115, "percent_no": 27.049180327868854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.5% sales tax in the City of Isleton for five years starting April 1, 2022, to fund fire protection services. The tax was projected to generate approximately $83,726 to $106,858 annually for the city's fire protection needs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.743810", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.328767", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to support the operation of the City of Isleton\u2019s fire protection needs, by establishing a one-half (\u00bd) percent transactions and use tax for a period of five (5) years commencing on April 1, 2022, that is projected to provide between $83,726.06 and $106,858.02 of revenue annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2768, "fingerprint": "2021|202100008|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100008|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "fc8b7842bd887884", "measure_id": "202100008", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on January 20, 2021, by the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County ordering a reorganization affecting Town of Apple Valley and County Service Area 70 and providing for the annexation to the Town of Apple Valley and detachment from County Service Area 70 of the territory described in that order and designated as LAFCO 3244, be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1, "no_votes": 13, "total_votes": 14, "percent_yes": 7.14285714285714, "percent_no": 92.85714285714286, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have confirmed the annexation of a specific territory to t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have confirmed the annexation of a specific territory to the Town of Apple Valley and its detachment from County Service Area 70, as ordered by the Local Agency Formation Commission. The reorganization would have transferred the designated territory from county service area jurisdiction to municipal jurisdiction under Apple Valley.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-08-31", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.744081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.328958", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on January 20, 2021, by the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County ordering a reorganization affecting Town of Apple Valley and County Service Area 70 and providing for the annexation to the Town of Apple Valley and detachment from County Service Area 70 of the territory described in that order and designated as LAFCO 3244, be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2769, "fingerprint": "2021|202100029|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100029|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d3bb59e3ef80db89", "measure_id": "202100029", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative in support of parking and community gathering spots on residentially zoned parcels within and adjacent to the Town Center be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1160, "no_votes": 1155, "total_votes": 2315, "percent_yes": 50.10799136069114, "percent_no": 49.89200863930886, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative allows parking and community gathering spots to be establishe...", "summary_text": "This initiative allows parking and community gathering spots to be established on residentially zoned properties within and adjacent to San Mateo's Town Center. The measure passed by a narrow margin with 50.1% voter approval in 2021.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.744466", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.329139", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative in support of parking and community gathering spots on residentially zoned parcels within and adjacent to the Town Center be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2771, "fingerprint": "2021|202100040|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100040|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7e230def6f8f035f", "measure_id": "202100040", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the measure to: protect outstanding public schools; attract and retain high quality teachers; support core academic and enrichment programs; and ensure reasonable class size at Encinal, Laurel, Oak Knoll, and Hillview schools by renewing the expiring Menlo Park City School District parcel tax at a new rate of $598 per parcel, expiring after 12 years, providing $4,600,000 annually, with senior exemptions, annual adjustments, independent oversight, and all funds staying local, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6022, "no_votes": 2075, "total_votes": 8097, "percent_yes": 74.37322465110535, "percent_no": 25.626775348894654, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure renews the Menlo Park City School District's parcel tax at $598 p...", "summary_text": "The measure renews the Menlo Park City School District's parcel tax at $598 per parcel for 12 years, generating approximately $4,600,000 annually for the four district schools. The tax includes senior exemptions, annual adjustments, and independent oversight with all funds remaining within the local district.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.745170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.329510", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to: protect outstanding public schools; attract and retain high quality teachers; support core academic and enrichment programs; and ensure reasonable class size at Encinal, Laurel, Oak Knoll, and Hillview schools by renewing the expiring Menlo Park City School District parcel tax at a new rate of $598 per parcel, expiring after 12 years, providing $4,600,000 annually, with senior exemptions, annual adjustments, independent oversight, and all funds staying local, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2770, "fingerprint": "2021|202100039|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100039|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "32b16dbb126b7a61", "measure_id": "202100039", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent local schools, shall Portola Valley School District protect enhanced science, math, reading/writing instruction, retain qualified/experienced teachers, support music and arts programs, maintain small class sizes and school library services by renewing and reducing the current annual per parcel tax to $471, raising approximately $997,000 annually, for 8 years, with senior exemptions, annual audits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, no funds for Sacramento, and all funds supporting Portola Valley School District students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1972, "no_votes": 653, "total_votes": 2625, "percent_yes": 75.12380952380953, "percent_no": 24.876190476190473, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure renewed and reduced an annual per parcel tax to $471 for the Port...", "summary_text": "The measure renewed and reduced an annual per parcel tax to $471 for the Portola Valley School District to raise approximately $997,000 annually for 8 years to fund instructional programs, maintain class sizes, and support school services. The measure included provisions for senior exemptions, annual audits, citizen oversight, and prohibited use of funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-05-04", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.744900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.329326", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent local schools, shall Portola Valley School District protect enhanced science, math, reading/writing instruction, retain qualified/experienced teachers, support music and arts programs, maintain small class sizes and school library services by renewing and reducing the current annual per parcel tax to $471, raising approximately $997,000 annually, for 8 years, with senior exemptions, annual audits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, no funds for Sacramento, and all funds supporting Portola Valley School District students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2772, "fingerprint": "2021|202100030|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100030|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "535feea962b5ccb8", "measure_id": "202100030", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure, (i) imposing a graduated tax ranging from 0.5 cents per dollar to 2.5 cents per dollar, at half-cent increments, on five levels of Lompoc cannabis manufacturing/distribution operators\u2019 annual revenues ranging from $10,000,000 or less to over $55,000,000, with no sunset clause, estimated to collect $1,200,000 annually based on currently established operations, (ii) excluding sales/excise taxes from City cannabis tax calculations and (iii) allowing receipts to show those taxes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7434, "no_votes": 2516, "total_votes": 9950, "percent_yes": 74.71356783919599, "percent_no": 25.28643216080401, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposes a graduated tax on cannabis manufacturing and distributi...", "summary_text": "This measure imposes a graduated tax on cannabis manufacturing and distribution businesses in Lompoc ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 cents per dollar of annual revenue based on five revenue tiers from $10 million to over $55 million. The measure excludes sales and excise taxes from the cannabis tax calculations and allows those taxes to be shown separately on receipts, with an estimated annual collection of $1.2 million.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-09-14", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.745445", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.329691", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure, (i) imposing a graduated tax ranging from 0.5 cents per dollar to 2.5 cents per dollar, at half-cent increments, on five levels of Lompoc cannabis manufacturing/distribution operators\u2019 annual revenues ranging from $10,000,000 or less to over $55,000,000, with no sunset clause, estimated to collect $1,200,000 annually based on currently established operations, (ii) excluding sales/excise taxes from City cannabis tax calculations and (iii) allowing receipts to show those taxes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11080, "fingerprint": "2021|202100042|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100042|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c93a4a0e494a5e56", "measure_id": "202100042", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renew, without increasing taxes, expiring local elementary and middle school funding that cannot be taken by the State; maintain core academic programs in science, technology, math, reading and writing; attract and retain quality teachers; provide learning technology; keep school libraries open; shall the Berryessa Union School District measure be adopted renewing its existing $79 annual parcel tax, providing $1,800,000 annually for 8 years, with citizen oversight, senior exemptions, no funds for administrator salaries, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6498, "no_votes": 2678, "total_votes": 9176, "percent_yes": 70.8151700087184, "percent_no": 29.184829991281603, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing $79 annual parcel tax for the Berryessa Unio...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing $79 annual parcel tax for the Berryessa Union School District for 8 years, generating $1.8 million annually to fund elementary and middle school programs including core academics, technology, libraries, and teacher retention. The measure included citizen oversight, senior exemptions, and restrictions preventing funds from being used for administrator salaries or taken by the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.346955", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.746092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.330072", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew, without increasing taxes, expiring local elementary and middle school funding that cannot be taken by the State; maintain core academic programs in science, technology, math, reading and writing; attract and retain quality teachers; provide learning technology; keep school libraries open; shall the Berryessa Union School District measure be adopted renewing its existing $79 annual parcel tax, providing $1,800,000 annually for 8 years, with citizen oversight, senior exemptions, no funds for administrator salaries, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2773, "fingerprint": "2021|202100041|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100041|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ff0bbcea4680892f", "measure_id": "202100041", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain our high quality teachers and staff with competitive compensation, help keep schools open, ensure fiscal solvency, and provide programs to support students\u2019 social and emotional wellness, shall the Cupertino Union School District measure replacing its current parcel tax with a new $398 measure raising approximately $14,000,000 annually for eight years, be adopted, with independent community oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, exemptions for seniors, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15129, "no_votes": 10363, "total_votes": 25492, "percent_yes": 59.34803075474658, "percent_no": 40.65196924525342, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have replaced the Cupertino Union School District's existi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have replaced the Cupertino Union School District's existing parcel tax with a new $398 annual parcel tax for eight years, generating approximately $14 million annually for teacher compensation, school operations, and student support programs. The measure included exemptions for senior citizens and prohibited the use of funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-05-04", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.745725", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.329883", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain our high quality teachers and staff with competitive compensation, help keep schools open, ensure fiscal solvency, and provide programs to support students\u2019 social and emotional wellness, shall the Cupertino Union School District measure replacing its current parcel tax with a new $398 measure raising approximately $14,000,000 annually for eight years, be adopted, with independent community oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, exemptions for seniors, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2774, "fingerprint": "2021|202100043|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100043|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "577c7bed3d068901", "measure_id": "202100043", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain highly qualified teachers, maintain and protect core academic programs, and improve programs in science, technology, engineering, arts, music and math for elementary and middle school students; shall the Los Gatos Union School District measure renewing funding at the current $290 rate and adding $45 per parcel be adopted, providing $3.2 million annually for eight years that cannot be taken by the State, with senior exemptions, annual adjustments, independent oversight and no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6532, "no_votes": 2065, "total_votes": 8597, "percent_yes": 75.97999302082121, "percent_no": 24.02000697917879, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed existing property tax funding at $290 per parcel and add...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed existing property tax funding at $290 per parcel and added an additional $45 per parcel to provide $3.2 million annually for eight years to the Los Gatos Union School District. The funds are designated for teacher retention, academic programs, and STEAM education with exemptions for seniors and prohibitions on using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.746369", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.330254", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain highly qualified teachers, maintain and protect core academic programs, and improve programs in science, technology, engineering, arts, music and math for elementary and middle school students; shall the Los Gatos Union School District measure renewing funding at the current $290 rate and adding $45 per parcel be adopted, providing $3.2 million annually for eight years that cannot be taken by the State, with senior exemptions, annual adjustments, independent oversight and no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2775, "fingerprint": "2021|202100031|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100031|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "24f9b8f5315a5af9", "measure_id": "202100031", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To solidify the City of Santa Cruz\u2019s commitment to prioritizing funding for children and youth programs and services, shall the Santa Cruz City Charter be amended to allocate 20 percent of revenue generated by the Cannabis Business Tax to youth and early childhood development programs and services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9090, "no_votes": 1896, "total_votes": 10986, "percent_yes": 82.7416712179137, "percent_no": 17.258328782086295, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends the Santa Cruz City Charter to dedicate 20 percent of cann...", "summary_text": "The measure amends the Santa Cruz City Charter to dedicate 20 percent of cannabis business tax revenue to youth and early childhood development programs and services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-11-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.746645", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.330465", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To solidify the City of Santa Cruz\u2019s commitment to prioritizing funding for children and youth programs and services, shall the Santa Cruz City Charter be amended to allocate 20 percent of revenue generated by the Cannabis Business Tax to youth and early childhood development programs and services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2778, "fingerprint": "2021|202100033|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100033|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9b71593b58e86cea", "measure_id": "202100033", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Jill Ravitch be recalled (removed) from the office of District Attorney?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45249, "no_votes": 144519, "total_votes": 189768, "percent_yes": 23.84437839888706, "percent_no": 76.15562160111294, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Jill Ravitch from her posi...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall Jill Ravitch from her position as Sonoma County District Attorney. The measure failed, meaning Ravitch remained in office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-09-14", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.747451", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.331029", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jill Ravitch be recalled (removed) from the office of District Attorney?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2779, "fingerprint": "2021|202100044|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100044|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ad04c205ffe62880", "measure_id": "202100044", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renew and provide stable funding at Analy, El Molino and Laguna High Schools that the State cannot take away; protect music, art, dance, shop, culinary and other career technical programs; retain teachers/staff; keep class sizes low; shall the West Sonoma County Union High School District measure to levy $48.00 per parcel annually for three years be adopted, raising $1,150,000 annually, have no funds for administrators' salaries, provide a senior citizens' exemption and have all funds stay local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9395, "no_votes": 6726, "total_votes": 16121, "percent_yes": 58.27802245518268, "percent_no": 41.72197754481732, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have levied a $48 annual parcel tax for three years to fun...", "summary_text": "This measure would have levied a $48 annual parcel tax for three years to fund programs and staffing at three high schools in the West Sonoma County Union High School District, raising approximately $1,150,000 annually. The measure included exemptions for senior citizens and prohibited using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-03-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.747720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.331212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew and provide stable funding at Analy, El Molino and Laguna High Schools that the State cannot take away; protect music, art, dance, shop, culinary and other career technical programs; retain teachers/staff; keep class sizes low; shall the West Sonoma County Union High School District measure to levy $48.00 per parcel annually for three years be adopted, raising $1,150,000 annually, have no funds for administrators' salaries, provide a senior citizens' exemption and have all funds stay local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2776, "fingerprint": "2021|202100009|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100009|SONOMA", "content_hash": "17eb45942366b107", "measure_id": "202100009", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To address tourism impacts on West County communities and paid only by guests, shall the measure be adopted to add an additional 4% transient occupancy tax in West County for hotels and shortterm rentals, to support sustainable paramedic emergency medical and rescue services provided by local fire agencies, and to support West County schools and education, raising approximately $2.7 million annually, with all funds exclusively used for West County, effective until amended/repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10454, "no_votes": 6305, "total_votes": 16759, "percent_yes": 62.37842353362373, "percent_no": 37.62157646637627, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have added an additional 4% transient occupancy tax on hot...", "summary_text": "This measure would have added an additional 4% transient occupancy tax on hotels and short-term rentals in West County Sonoma, with revenues of approximately $2.7 million annually dedicated to local fire/paramedic services and schools. The measure failed despite receiving 62.4% yes votes, likely requiring a higher threshold for passage.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-03-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.746916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.330662", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address tourism impacts on West County communities and paid only by guests, shall the measure be adopted to add an additional 4% transient occupancy tax in West County for hotels and shortterm rentals, to support sustainable paramedic emergency medical and rescue services provided by local fire agencies, and to support West County schools and education, raising approximately $2.7 million annually, with all funds exclusively used for West County, effective until amended/repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2777, "fingerprint": "2021|202100032|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2021|202100032|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f9a72035bb0aea6a", "measure_id": "202100032", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2021, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 954, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park Repealing and Replacing Chapter 9.49 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code to Prohibit the Sale and Use of Fireworks, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8312, "no_votes": 7989, "total_votes": 16301, "percent_yes": 50.99073676461566, "percent_no": 49.00926323538434, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance would repeal and replace existing fireworks regulations in Rohn...", "summary_text": "The ordinance would repeal and replace existing fireworks regulations in Rohnert Park's municipal code to prohibit both the sale and use of fireworks within the city.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2021-09-14", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.747184", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.330845", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 954, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rohnert Park Repealing and Replacing Chapter 9.49 of the Rohnert Park Municipal Code to Prohibit the Sale and Use of Fireworks, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2815, "fingerprint": "2020|202000459|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000459|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2c19e6a206cb77e1", "measure_id": "202000459", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support all Alameda students and maintain high-quality Alameda schools by attracting and retaining excellent teachers and employees, sustaining strong academic programs in reading, writing, math, arts/sciences, and helping counselors support struggling students, shall an Alameda Unified School District measure, levying $0.265 per building area square foot (capped at $7,999 per parcel) and $299 per vacant parcel annually for 7 years, be adopted, raising $10,500,000 annually with senior exemptions, audits, oversight, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19554, "no_votes": 9588, "total_votes": 29142, "percent_yes": 67.09903232448013, "percent_no": 32.900967675519865, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levied a property tax of $0", "summary_text": "This measure levied a property tax of $0.265 per square foot of building area (capped at $7,999 per parcel) and $299 per vacant parcel annually for 7 years to raise approximately $10.5 million per year for the Alameda Unified School District. The measure included senior exemptions and required audits and oversight, with all funds designated to stay within the local district.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.758875", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.338033", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support all Alameda students and maintain high-quality Alameda schools by attracting and retaining excellent teachers and employees, sustaining strong academic programs in reading, writing, math, arts/sciences, and helping counselors support struggling students, shall an Alameda Unified School District measure, levying $0.265 per building area square foot (capped at $7,999 per parcel) and $299 per vacant parcel annually for 7 years, be adopted, raising $10,500,000 annually with senior exemptions, audits, oversight, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2796, "fingerprint": "2020|202000095|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000095|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e6e475aec332c1a2", "measure_id": "202000095", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the City Charter to clarify the prohibition against members of the City Council interfering with City Manager's duties, authorize the City Attorney to prosecute State law misdemeanors, and amend outdated provisions, including utilizing gender neutral language, be adopted? Such amendments will be accomplished by amending Charter Sections 2-9, 2-16, 7-3, 8-2, 10-2, 10-3, 10-4, 10-4.1, and deleting Sections 2-15, 22-7, 22-8, as set forth in City Council Resolution No. 15673.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28585, "no_votes": 10300, "total_votes": 38885, "percent_yes": 73.5116368779735, "percent_no": 26.4883631220265, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends Alameda's City Charter to clarify that City Council membe...", "summary_text": "This measure amends Alameda's City Charter to clarify that City Council members cannot interfere with the City Manager's duties and gives the City Attorney authority to prosecute state law misdemeanors. It also updates outdated charter provisions with gender-neutral language and deletes certain obsolete sections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.753149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.334332", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the City Charter to clarify the prohibition against members of the City Council interfering with City Manager's duties, authorize the City Attorney to prosecute State law misdemeanors, and amend outdated provisions, including utilizing gender neutral language, be adopted? Such amendments will be accomplished by amending Charter Sections 2-9, 2-16, 7-3, 8-2, 10-2, 10-3, 10-4, 10-4.1, and deleting Sections 2-15, 22-7, 22-8, as set forth in City Council Resolution No. 15673.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2816, "fingerprint": "2020|202000460|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000460|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b69f37d63c7ed562", "measure_id": "202000460", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent schools; attract and retain exceptional teachers and counselors; protect science, arts, language, library services, and reading and math support; limit class sizes; keep schools safe; and keep classroom technology and materials up-to-date; shall Albany Unified School District adopt a measure renewing an expiring $318 annual parcel tax, adding $130 annually, for six years, with senior exemptions, cost of living adjustments, and independent audits, raising $2,200,000 annually, with all funds staying local to benefit Albany students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6409, "no_votes": 1298, "total_votes": 7707, "percent_yes": 83.15816789931232, "percent_no": 16.841832100687682, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure renews an expiring $318 annual parcel tax and adds $130 annually ...", "summary_text": "The measure renews an expiring $318 annual parcel tax and adds $130 annually for six years in the Albany Unified School District, raising approximately $2,200,000 annually for school operations and programs. The tax includes exemptions for seniors, cost of living adjustments, and requires independent audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.759305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.338214", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent schools; attract and retain exceptional teachers and counselors; protect science, arts, language, library services, and reading and math support; limit class sizes; keep schools safe; and keep classroom technology and materials up-to-date; shall Albany Unified School District adopt a measure renewing an expiring $318 annual parcel tax, adding $130 annually, for six years, with senior exemptions, cost of living adjustments, and independent audits, raising $2,200,000 annually, with all funds staying local to benefit Albany students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2797, "fingerprint": "2020|202000097|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000097|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c508f95f0130105e", "measure_id": "202000097", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted to change the current method of electing City Council and Board of Education Members from obtaining a plurality of votes to Ranked Choice Voting, in order to make Albany's elections more representative of the votes and preferences of its voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7155, "no_votes": 2610, "total_votes": 9765, "percent_yes": 73.27188940092167, "percent_no": 26.728110599078335, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure changed Albany's City Council and Board of Education elections fr...", "summary_text": "The measure changed Albany's City Council and Board of Education elections from a plurality voting system to ranked choice voting, where voters can rank candidates in order of preference.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.753420", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.334515", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted to change the current method of electing City Council and Board of Education Members from obtaining a plurality of votes to Ranked Choice Voting, in order to make Albany's elections more representative of the votes and preferences of its voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2782, "fingerprint": "2020|202000004|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000004|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "429afeae5148ee6c", "measure_id": "202000004", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve critical early health and education for Alameda County children by: protecting local childrens' healthcare safety net and Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center; and increasing access to high quality, affordable childcare and preschool to improve kindergarten readiness, school success and high school graduation rates; shall a County of Alameda ordinance enacting a 20-year half-percent sales tax providing approximately $150,000,000 annually with citizens' oversight and mandatory annual audits be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 287027, "no_votes": 159046, "total_votes": 446073, "percent_yes": 64.34529774274614, "percent_no": 35.65470225725386, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.5% sales tax in Alameda County for 20 years to generate approximately $150 million annually for children's healthcare services, including maintaining a pediatric trauma center, and expanding access to childcare and preschool programs. The measure includes citizen oversight and mandatory annual audits of the funding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.748944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.331766", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve critical early health and education for Alameda County children by: protecting local childrens' healthcare safety net and Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center; and increasing access to high quality, affordable childcare and preschool to improve kindergarten readiness, school success and high school graduation rates; shall a County of Alameda ordinance enacting a 20-year half-percent sales tax providing approximately $150,000,000 annually with citizens' oversight and mandatory annual audits be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2806, "fingerprint": "2020|202000098|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000098|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f04020f343217fd5", "measure_id": "202000098", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support City of Albany general services, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including: emergency response services, environmental programs, community services and local business programs, shall a measure increasing the City's real property transfer tax rate from $11.50 to $15.00 per $1,000 purchased, providing an additional $392,000 annually, until ended by voters, with all funds remaining local be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5512, "no_votes": 4264, "total_votes": 9776, "percent_yes": 56.38297872340425, "percent_no": 43.61702127659575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Albany's real property transfer tax from $11", "summary_text": "This measure increased Albany's real property transfer tax from $11.50 to $15.00 per $1,000 of property value purchased to fund general city services including emergency response, environmental programs, community services, and local business programs. The tax increase was estimated to generate an additional $392,000 annually for the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.756328", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.336341", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support City of Albany general services, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including: emergency response services, environmental programs, community services and local business programs, shall a measure increasing the City's real property transfer tax rate from $11.50 to $15.00 per $1,000 purchased, providing an additional $392,000 annually, until ended by voters, with all funds remaining local be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2780, "fingerprint": "2020|202000005|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000005|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "19256451727afa32", "measure_id": "202000005", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure authorizing the Alameda County Fire Department to issue $90,000,000 in general obligation bonds to repair / replace outdated stations, thereby maintaining services in unincorporated communities (including medical emergency lifesaving services, fast 911 response, wildfire protection and disaster response) in an estimated levy of 1.6 cents per $100 assessed value, raising on average $5,200,000 annually for approximately 31 years, with oversight and audits, and no funds for salaries, benefits or pensions be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21188, "no_votes": 10735, "total_votes": 31923, "percent_yes": 66.37220812580271, "percent_no": 33.627791874197285, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Alameda County Fire Department to issue $9...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Alameda County Fire Department to issue $90 million in general obligation bonds to repair and replace outdated fire stations serving unincorporated communities. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 1.6 cents per $100 of assessed value over about 31 years.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.748125", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.331399", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure authorizing the Alameda County Fire Department to issue $90,000,000 in general obligation bonds to repair / replace outdated stations, thereby maintaining services in unincorporated communities (including medical emergency lifesaving services, fast 911 response, wildfire protection and disaster response) in an estimated levy of 1.6 cents per $100 assessed value, raising on average $5,200,000 annually for approximately 31 years, with oversight and audits, and no funds for salaries, benefits or pensions be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2807, "fingerprint": "2020|202000099|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000099|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8ae90774e196a623", "measure_id": "202000099", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support City of Albany general services including: disaster and emergency preparedness, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, emergency response and environmental sustainability, shall a measure increasing the City's utility users' tax from 7% to 9.5% for gas and electric service, and applying the tax to water service at 7.5%, providing an additional $675,000 annually until ended by voters, exempting self-generated energy, exempting low-income households, requiring independent audits, with all funds remaining local be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5737, "no_votes": 4146, "total_votes": 9883, "percent_yes": 58.04917535161388, "percent_no": 41.95082464838612, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Albany's utility users' tax from 7% to 9", "summary_text": "This measure increased Albany's utility users' tax from 7% to 9.5% for gas and electric service and applied a 7.5% tax to water service, with exemptions for self-generated energy and low-income households. The measure was expected to generate an additional $675,000 annually for general city services including emergency preparedness and environmental programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.756601", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.336520", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support City of Albany general services including: disaster and emergency preparedness, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, emergency response and environmental sustainability, shall a measure increasing the City's utility users' tax from 7% to 9.5% for gas and electric service, and applying the tax to water service at 7.5%, providing an additional $675,000 annually until ended by voters, exempting self-generated energy, exempting low-income households, requiring independent audits, with all funds remaining local be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2817, "fingerprint": "2020|202000461|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000461|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ec8145bf9397a58a", "measure_id": "202000461", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To recruit and retain qualified teachers and prevent shortages of essential school staff, shall the Berkeley Unified School District adopt a measure to levy a special tax of 12.4\u00a2/square foot on improvements, and $25/parcel on unimproved parcels, for 12 years, with annual cost-of-living adjustments, low income exemptions, and independent citizen and auditor oversight, generating approximately $9,500,000 annually in local funds for Berkeley public schools that cannot be taken away by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39860, "no_votes": 9652, "total_votes": 49512, "percent_yes": 80.50573598319599, "percent_no": 19.49426401680401, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Berkeley Unified School District to levy a specia...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Berkeley Unified School District to levy a special tax of 12.4 cents per square foot on improved properties and $25 per parcel on unimproved parcels for 12 years to generate approximately $9.5 million annually for local school funding. The tax includes annual cost-of-living adjustments, low-income exemptions, and independent oversight requirements.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.759594", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.338395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To recruit and retain qualified teachers and prevent shortages of essential school staff, shall the Berkeley Unified School District adopt a measure to levy a special tax of 12.4\u00a2/square foot on improvements, and $25/parcel on unimproved parcels, for 12 years, with annual cost-of-living adjustments, low income exemptions, and independent citizen and auditor oversight, generating approximately $9,500,000 annually in local funds for Berkeley public schools that cannot be taken away by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2789, "fingerprint": "2020|202000100|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000100|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1c6056903fd6dd22", "measure_id": "202000100", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City of Albany paramedic, advanced life support, fire engine and ambulance service, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento; shall a measure increasing the annual current paramedic advanced life support fire engine and ambulance service special tax from $23.66 to $68 per assigned residential unit, providing an additional $359,600 annually until ended by voters, exempting very low-income residents, with annual independent audits, with all funds remaining local, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5753, "no_votes": 4019, "total_votes": 9772, "percent_yes": 58.87228817028244, "percent_no": 41.12771182971756, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased Albany's annual special tax for paramedic a...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased Albany's annual special tax for paramedic and fire services from $23.66 to $68 per residential unit, generating an additional $359,600 annually with exemptions for very low-income residents. The measure failed despite receiving 58.9% support, as it required a two-thirds majority to pass.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.751106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.333045", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City of Albany paramedic, advanced life support, fire engine and ambulance service, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento; shall a measure increasing the annual current paramedic advanced life support fire engine and ambulance service special tax from $23.66 to $68 per assigned residential unit, providing an additional $359,600 annually until ended by voters, exempting very low-income residents, with annual independent audits, with all funds remaining local, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2787, "fingerprint": "2020|202000088|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000088|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b252ac0973981cf6", "measure_id": "202000088", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain health communities and improve quality of life in Emeryville, shall a measure to protect the safety of local residents, reduce property crimes/auto burglaries, improve fire protection services, and provide a nurturing environment for pre-K/early childhood education for working families by levying a quarter-cent sales tax, raising approximately $2 million annually, until ended by voter, with independent oversight and audits, exclusively for public safety and child development in Emeryville, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2589, "no_votes": 886, "total_votes": 3475, "percent_yes": 74.50359712230215, "percent_no": 25.496402877697847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a quarter-cent sales tax in Emeryville to fund public...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a quarter-cent sales tax in Emeryville to fund public safety services and pre-K/early childhood education programs, generating approximately $2 million annually. The tax continues until voters choose to end it and includes provisions for independent oversight and audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.750515", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.332673", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain health communities and improve quality of life in Emeryville, shall a measure to protect the safety of local residents, reduce property crimes/auto burglaries, improve fire protection services, and provide a nurturing environment for pre-K/early childhood education for working families by levying a quarter-cent sales tax, raising approximately $2 million annually, until ended by voter, with independent oversight and audits, exclusively for public safety and child development in Emeryville, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2790, "fingerprint": "2020|202000101|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000101|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8b28369097f25960", "measure_id": "202000101", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance enacting a tax at a rate of $0.1047 per square foot of improvements, which is estimated to generate $8.5 million annually for firefighting, emergency medical response, 9-1-1 communications services, hazard mitigation, and wildfire prevention and preparedness, until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43756, "no_votes": 15221, "total_votes": 58977, "percent_yes": 74.19163402682402, "percent_no": 25.80836597317598, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacted a tax of $0", "summary_text": "The measure enacted a tax of $0.1047 per square foot of improvements on properties in Alameda to fund firefighting, emergency medical response, 9-1-1 communications, hazard mitigation, and wildfire prevention services. The tax was estimated to generate $8.5 million annually and remains in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.751436", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.333227", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance enacting a tax at a rate of $0.1047 per square foot of improvements, which is estimated to generate $8.5 million annually for firefighting, emergency medical response, 9-1-1 communications services, hazard mitigation, and wildfire prevention and preparedness, until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2818, "fingerprint": "2020|202000462|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000462|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "abc9e68a528b35a5", "measure_id": "202000462", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve school facilities, construct/ modernize classrooms and campuses, complete seismic upgrades, construct science labs/ career technical education facilities, upgrade furnishings, equipment, technology, renovate playgrounds, improve energy efficiency, and qualify for State grants, shall the Berkeley Unified School District adopt a measure authorizing $380,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, generating approximately $21,347,300 annually at an average rate of 4.45 cents per $100 while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen and auditor oversight and all funds remaining local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37403, "no_votes": 9048, "total_votes": 46451, "percent_yes": 80.52140965748855, "percent_no": 19.478590342511453, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Berkeley Unified School District to issue $380 mi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Berkeley Unified School District to issue $380 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including classroom construction and modernization, seismic upgrades, science labs, career technical education facilities, equipment upgrades, and playground renovations. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of 4.45 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.759864", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.338590", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve school facilities, construct/ modernize classrooms and campuses, complete seismic upgrades, construct science labs/ career technical education facilities, upgrade furnishings, equipment, technology, renovate playgrounds, improve energy efficiency, and qualify for State grants, shall the Berkeley Unified School District adopt a measure authorizing $380,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, generating approximately $21,347,300 annually at an average rate of 4.45 cents per $100 while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen and auditor oversight and all funds remaining local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2808, "fingerprint": "2020|202000102|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000102|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "40b14241ff169ac5", "measure_id": "202000102", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance enacting a tax on users of Transportation Network Companies for prearranged trips originating in Berkeley, at a rate of 50 cents per trip for private trips and 25 cents per trip for pooled trips, regardless of the number of passengers on the trip, which is estimated to generate $910,000 annually for general municipal services in the City of Berkeley until January 1, 2041, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34001, "no_votes": 23842, "total_votes": 57843, "percent_yes": 58.78152931210345, "percent_no": 41.21847068789655, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a tax on Transportation Network Company trips (such as U...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a tax on Transportation Network Company trips (such as Uber and Lyft) originating in Berkeley, charging 50 cents per private trip and 25 cents per pooled trip. The tax is estimated to generate $910,000 annually for general municipal services until January 1, 2041.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.756869", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.336700", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance enacting a tax on users of Transportation Network Companies for prearranged trips originating in Berkeley, at a rate of 50 cents per trip for private trips and 25 cents per trip for pooled trips, regardless of the number of passengers on the trip, which is estimated to generate $910,000 annually for general municipal services in the City of Berkeley until January 1, 2041, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2819, "fingerprint": "2020|202000463|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000463|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3f02f483fdf0dab2", "measure_id": "202000463", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide essential maintenance of buildings, classrooms, grounds, roofs, electrical, mechanical/plumbing systems, and address fire/safety hazards, shall Berkeley Unified School District adopt a measure to continue its existing special tax at 9.1\u00a2/square foot on improvements, and $20/parcel on unimproved parcels, for 10 years, with cost-of-living adjustments, low-income exemptions, independent citizen and auditor oversight, generating approximately $7,330,841 annually in local funds for Berkeley public schools that cannot be taken away by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39100, "no_votes": 7594, "total_votes": 46694, "percent_yes": 83.7366685227224, "percent_no": 16.263331477277603, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues Berkeley Unified School District's existing special pr...", "summary_text": "This measure continues Berkeley Unified School District's existing special property tax at 9.1 cents per square foot on improved properties and $20 per parcel on unimproved properties for 10 years to fund school facility maintenance and safety improvements. The tax includes cost-of-living adjustments and low-income exemptions, generating approximately $7.3 million annually for the district.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.760267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.338773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide essential maintenance of buildings, classrooms, grounds, roofs, electrical, mechanical/plumbing systems, and address fire/safety hazards, shall Berkeley Unified School District adopt a measure to continue its existing special tax at 9.1\u00a2/square foot on improvements, and $20/parcel on unimproved parcels, for 10 years, with cost-of-living adjustments, low-income exemptions, independent citizen and auditor oversight, generating approximately $7,330,841 annually in local funds for Berkeley public schools that cannot be taken away by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2809, "fingerprint": "2020|202000103|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000103|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5a56247b204a72ae", "measure_id": "202000103", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance increasing the Utility Users Tax on electricity and gas from 7.5% to 10%, with exemptions for low-income users, for general municipal services, including programs to equitably reduce local greenhouse gas emissions, and authorizing the City Council to increase the gas users tax by an additional 2.5%, with the total tax estimated to generate $2.4 million annually, until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27175, "no_votes": 30612, "total_votes": 57787, "percent_yes": 47.02614774949383, "percent_no": 52.97385225050617, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased Alameda's utility tax on electricity and ga...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased Alameda's utility tax on electricity and gas from 7.5% to 10% with low-income exemptions, and allowed the City Council to potentially raise the gas tax by another 2.5%, generating an estimated $2.4 million annually for general municipal services including greenhouse gas reduction programs. The measure failed with 47% voter support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.757133", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.336892", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance increasing the Utility Users Tax on electricity and gas from 7.5% to 10%, with exemptions for low-income users, for general municipal services, including programs to equitably reduce local greenhouse gas emissions, and authorizing the City Council to increase the gas users tax by an additional 2.5%, with the total tax estimated to generate $2.4 million annually, until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2820, "fingerprint": "2020|202000464|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000464|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "4eff400f5a8e73ef", "measure_id": "202000464", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education in Castro Valley elementary, middle and high schools, by retaining/attracting highly qualified teachers; preserving strong academic programs in reading, writing, science, technology, engineering, arts, and math; preparing students for college and careers; and supporting the well-being of all students; shall the Castro Valley Unified School District measure to levy $96 per parcel per year for 6 years to be adopted, raising approximately $1,500,000 annually with independent oversight, senior exemptions, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10789, "no_votes": 5909, "total_votes": 16698, "percent_yes": 64.61252844652054, "percent_no": 35.38747155347946, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Castro Valley Unified School District t...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Castro Valley Unified School District to levy a $96 annual parcel tax for 6 years, raising approximately $1.5 million annually for educational programs and teacher retention. The measure included provisions for independent oversight and senior citizen exemptions.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.760541", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.338963", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education in Castro Valley elementary, middle and high schools, by retaining/attracting highly qualified teachers; preserving strong academic programs in reading, writing, science, technology, engineering, arts, and math; preparing students for college and careers; and supporting the well-being of all students; shall the Castro Valley Unified School District measure to levy $96 per parcel per year for 6 years to be adopted, raising approximately $1,500,000 annually with independent oversight, senior exemptions, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2791, "fingerprint": "2020|202000104|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000104|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "115ab6de9c396074", "measure_id": "202000104", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the Berkeley City Charter to create an independent Berkeley Police Accountability Board and Director of Police Accountability to provide oversight of the Berkeley Police Department (Department) policies, practices, and procedures; obtain access to records; investigate complaints filed by members of the public against sworn employees of the Department; and recommend discipline of sworn employees of the Department, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50244, "no_votes": 9112, "total_votes": 59356, "percent_yes": 84.64856122380215, "percent_no": 15.351438776197853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Berkeley City Charter to create an independent Polic...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Berkeley City Charter to create an independent Police Accountability Board and Director of Police Accountability with authority to oversee Berkeley Police Department policies, access records, investigate public complaints against sworn officers, and recommend disciplinary actions based on a preponderance of evidence standard.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.751708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.333410", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the Berkeley City Charter to create an independent Berkeley Police Accountability Board and Director of Police Accountability to provide oversight of the Berkeley Police Department (Department) policies, practices, and procedures; obtain access to records; investigate complaints filed by members of the public against sworn employees of the Department; and recommend discipline of sworn employees of the Department, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2821, "fingerprint": "2020|202000465|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000465|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7e8d7a94eff10d97", "measure_id": "202000465", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Dublin Unified School District update/modernize older schools, complete the second comprehensive high school and construct a middle school to relieve overcrowding, by adopting a measure authorizing $290,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $18,300,000 raised annually, with rates averaging $50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizens oversight, and all funds benefiting Dublin schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7958, "no_votes": 5804, "total_votes": 13762, "percent_yes": 57.82589739863392, "percent_no": 42.17410260136608, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Dublin Unified School District to issue $290 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Dublin Unified School District to issue $290 million in bonds to update and modernize older schools, complete construction of a second comprehensive high school, and build a middle school to address overcrowding. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.761013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.339145", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Dublin Unified School District update/modernize older schools, complete the second comprehensive high school and construct a middle school to relieve overcrowding, by adopting a measure authorizing $290,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $18,300,000 raised annually, with rates averaging $50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizens oversight, and all funds benefiting Dublin schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2798, "fingerprint": "2020|202000105|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000105|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "09e8693b11a934a2", "measure_id": "202000105", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the City Charter to provide that compensation for the office of Mayor be set at Alameda County's median three-person household income from the California Department of Housing and Community Development and that of Councilmembers maintained at 63% of the Mayor's compensation, with annual increases based on changes in Area Median Income, but which may be lowered for unexcused Council meeting absences or negotiated salary reductions for City employees, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35742, "no_votes": 19573, "total_votes": 55315, "percent_yes": 64.61538461538461, "percent_no": 35.38461538461539, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Alameda's City Charter to set the Mayor's compensation a...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Alameda's City Charter to set the Mayor's compensation at Alameda County's median three-person household income and Councilmembers' compensation at 63% of the Mayor's pay, with annual adjustments based on changes in Area Median Income. The compensation could be reduced for unexcused absences from Council meetings or if City employee salaries are negotiated downward.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.753692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.334702", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the City Charter to provide that compensation for the office of Mayor be set at Alameda County's median three-person household income from the California Department of Housing and Community Development and that of Councilmembers maintained at 63% of the Mayor's compensation, with annual increases based on changes in Area Median Income, but which may be lowered for unexcused Council meeting absences or negotiated salary reductions for City employees, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2822, "fingerprint": "2020|202000466|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000466|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "61240889e678ec7b", "measure_id": "202000466", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To recruit/retain qualified, experienced teachers; maintain outstanding core academic programs/achievement in reading, writing, math, science, art; support the health/well-being of all students; and prepare students for college/21st century careers; shall the Emery Unified School District measure to levy and education parcel tax at 12\u00a2 per square foot of building area for 9 years, raising $1,800,000 annually with senior exemptions, citizen's oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds benefiting Emery Unified School District, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2855, "no_votes": 939, "total_votes": 3794, "percent_yes": 75.25039536109647, "percent_no": 24.749604638903534, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Emery Unified School District to levy an educatio...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Emery Unified School District to levy an education parcel tax of 12 cents per square foot of building area for 9 years, generating approximately $1,800,000 annually. The funds are designated for teacher recruitment and retention, academic programs, student health and well-being, and college/career preparation, with exemptions for seniors and restrictions preventing use for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.761292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.339337", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To recruit/retain qualified, experienced teachers; maintain outstanding core academic programs/achievement in reading, writing, math, science, art; support the health/well-being of all students; and prepare students for college/21st century careers; shall the Emery Unified School District measure to levy and education parcel tax at 12\u00a2 per square foot of building area for 9 years, raising $1,800,000 annually with senior exemptions, citizen's oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds benefiting Emery Unified School District, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2799, "fingerprint": "2020|202000106|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000106|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "242e56fa128047d4", "measure_id": "202000106", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the City Charter to eliminate the residency requirement for sworn members of the fire department, conform the provisions of Article V, Section 9.5 and Section 10 regarding the eligibility requirements for the Redistricting Commission to state law, remove gender-specific language and amend Article VII, Section 28 and Article XVI, Section 113 to update terms and duties of the office of City Attorney be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41762, "no_votes": 13877, "total_votes": 55639, "percent_yes": 75.05886158989198, "percent_no": 24.941138410108024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Alameda's City Charter to eliminate the residency requir...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Alameda's City Charter to eliminate the residency requirement for fire department sworn members, update Redistricting Commission eligibility requirements to match state law, remove gender-specific language, and modify terms and duties of the City Attorney position.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.753960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.334885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the City Charter to eliminate the residency requirement for sworn members of the fire department, conform the provisions of Article V, Section 9.5 and Section 10 regarding the eligibility requirements for the Redistricting Commission to state law, remove gender-specific language and amend Article VII, Section 28 and Article XVI, Section 113 to update terms and duties of the office of City Attorney be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2823, "fingerprint": "2020|202000467|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000467|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f69c0dc24c6cf44d", "measure_id": "202000467", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure quality education and maintain stable funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Fremont Unified School District's measure attracting and retaining highly qualified educators; enhancing science, technology, engineering, arts and math (STEAM) opportunities for students; maintaining math, science, reading and writing programs; restore smaller class size; annually levying $296 per parcel for 9 years, raising $18.3 million each year, with senior exemptions, independent citizens' oversight, and all funds for Fremont students, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25009, "no_votes": 20578, "total_votes": 45587, "percent_yes": 54.85993814025928, "percent_no": 45.14006185974072, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a $296 annual parcel tax for 9 years to raise...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a $296 annual parcel tax for 9 years to raise $18.3 million annually for the Fremont Unified School District, with funds designated for teacher retention, STEAM programs, core academic subjects, and smaller class sizes. The measure included senior exemptions and independent oversight but failed to pass despite receiving majority support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.761564", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.339586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure quality education and maintain stable funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Fremont Unified School District's measure attracting and retaining highly qualified educators; enhancing science, technology, engineering, arts and math (STEAM) opportunities for students; maintaining math, science, reading and writing programs; restore smaller class size; annually levying $296 per parcel for 9 years, raising $18.3 million each year, with senior exemptions, independent citizens' oversight, and all funds for Fremont students, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2810, "fingerprint": "2020|202000107|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000107|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3b1c1e748974dd58", "measure_id": "202000107", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City's appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased to allow expenditure of the proceeds of City taxes and income from the investment of those taxes for fiscal years 2021 through 2024? Financial Implications: This measure would not increase taxes or impose a new tax. It would authorize the City to continue to spend the proceeds of already-approved taxes for FY 2021 through 2024.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44947, "no_votes": 10282, "total_votes": 55229, "percent_yes": 81.38296909232469, "percent_no": 18.617030907675314, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Alameda's appropriation limit under the California Con...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Alameda's appropriation limit under the California Constitution to allow the city to spend proceeds from existing taxes and investment income for fiscal years 2021 through 2024. The measure did not create new taxes or increase existing tax rates, but authorized continued spending of already-approved tax revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.757398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.337075", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased to allow expenditure of the proceeds of City taxes and income from the investment of those taxes for fiscal years 2021 through 2024? Financial Implications: This measure would not increase taxes or impose a new tax. It would authorize the City to continue to spend the proceeds of already-approved taxes for FY 2021 through 2024.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2824, "fingerprint": "2020|202000468|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000468|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d9dc49bb47f8cc24", "measure_id": "202000468", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/construct classrooms and facilities to support science, technology, engineering, math, arts/music and accommodate growing student enrollment; improve safety/security systems; replace aging rooms, plumbing/electrical/HVAC systems; and improve access for students with disabilities; shall Pleasanton Unified School District's measure be adopted, authorizing $323,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising approximately $21,300,000 annually with rates averaging 4.31\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, and no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12562, "no_votes": 11411, "total_votes": 23973, "percent_yes": 52.40061736119801, "percent_no": 47.59938263880199, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Pleasanton Unified School District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Pleasanton Unified School District to issue $323 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms and facilities for STEM and arts programs, improve safety systems, replace aging infrastructure, and enhance disability access. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes averaging 4.31 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $21.3 million annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.761837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.339813", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/construct classrooms and facilities to support science, technology, engineering, math, arts/music and accommodate growing student enrollment; improve safety/security systems; replace aging rooms, plumbing/electrical/HVAC systems; and improve access for students with disabilities; shall Pleasanton Unified School District's measure be adopted, authorizing $323,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising approximately $21,300,000 annually with rates averaging 4.31\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, and no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2803, "fingerprint": "2020|202000108|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000108|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5e05369d8d4c33eb", "measure_id": "202000108", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the Rent Stabilization and Eviction for Good Cause Ordinance to: prohibit eviction of qualifying tenants for nonpayment of rent during state or local emergencies; authorize the Rent Stabilization Board to set registration fees for certain partially exempt units; and limit the Accessory Dwelling Unit exemption to owner-occupied properties with a single-family home and one accessory unit be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32033, "no_votes": 24319, "total_votes": 56352, "percent_yes": 56.84447756956275, "percent_no": 43.15552243043725, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended Alameda's rent control ordinance to prohibit evicting qua...", "summary_text": "The measure amended Alameda's rent control ordinance to prohibit evicting qualifying tenants for non-payment during emergencies, allow the Rent Stabilization Board to set registration fees for some partially exempt units, and restrict the accessory dwelling unit exemption to owner-occupied single-family properties with one accessory unit.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.755141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.335618", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the Rent Stabilization and Eviction for Good Cause Ordinance to: prohibit eviction of qualifying tenants for nonpayment of rent during state or local emergencies; authorize the Rent Stabilization Board to set registration fees for certain partially exempt units; and limit the Accessory Dwelling Unit exemption to owner-occupied properties with a single-family home and one accessory unit be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2825, "fingerprint": "2020|202000469|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000469|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d3aa804dc12e7432", "measure_id": "202000469", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, construct, acquire and equip classrooms, science labs, career training, and school facilities that support college/career readiness in science, technology, engineering, arts, and math and skilled trades; keep instructional technology current; and improve student safety/campus security, shall the San Leandro Unified School District measure authorizing $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 4 cents per $100 assessed value ($10,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money benefiting San Leandro children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11147, "no_votes": 6298, "total_votes": 17445, "percent_yes": 63.897965032960734, "percent_no": 36.102034967039266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Leandro Unified School District to issue $198...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Leandro Unified School District to issue $198 million in bonds to repair, construct, and equip school facilities including classrooms, science labs, and career training facilities, as well as update technology and improve campus safety. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 4 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.762268", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.340048", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, construct, acquire and equip classrooms, science labs, career training, and school facilities that support college/career readiness in science, technology, engineering, arts, and math and skilled trades; keep instructional technology current; and improve student safety/campus security, shall the San Leandro Unified School District measure authorizing $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 4 cents per $100 assessed value ($10,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money benefiting San Leandro children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2811, "fingerprint": "2020|202000109|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000109|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3c883b350dfab6f5", "measure_id": "202000109", "measure_letter": "NN", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support City of Hayward services, including: repairing streets and sidewalks; 911 emergency and firefighter response times; disaster preparedness; extended library hours and after-school programs; and other general City services with revenue that cannot be taken by the State; shall the City of Hayward increase the transient occupancy tax paid only by hotel and motel guests from 8.5% to no more than 14%, providing and estimated $3,000,000 annually, until repealed by voters, all funds benefiting Hayward?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41393, "no_votes": 15884, "total_votes": 57277, "percent_yes": 72.26810063376224, "percent_no": 27.731899366237755, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Hayward's transient occupancy tax on hotel and motel g...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Hayward's transient occupancy tax on hotel and motel guests from 8.5% to no more than 14%, generating an estimated $3 million annually for city services including street repairs, emergency response, disaster preparedness, library hours, and after-school programs. The tax increase applies only to hotel and motel guests and continues until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.757666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.337256", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support City of Hayward services, including: repairing streets and sidewalks; 911 emergency and firefighter response times; disaster preparedness; extended library hours and after-school programs; and other general City services with revenue that cannot be taken by the State; shall the City of Hayward increase the transient occupancy tax paid only by hotel and motel guests from 8.5% to no more than 14%, providing and estimated $3,000,000 annually, until repealed by voters, all funds benefiting Hayward?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2826, "fingerprint": "2020|202000470|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000470|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2fee75b52e2638f4", "measure_id": "202000470", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education facilities; renovate electrical, plumbing and HVAC systems; repair/replace leaky roofs; and construct a multi-purpose room and technology, engineering, and math lab; shall Sunol Glen Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing the issuance of $9,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $535,972 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at rates of approximately 5.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 227, "no_votes": 222, "total_votes": 449, "percent_yes": 50.55679287305123, "percent_no": 49.44320712694877, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Sunol Glen Unified School District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Sunol Glen Unified School District to issue $9.5 million in bonds to renovate school facilities including electrical, plumbing, and HVAC systems, repair roofs, and construct new classroom spaces. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 5.9 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.762539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.340282", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education facilities; renovate electrical, plumbing and HVAC systems; repair/replace leaky roofs; and construct a multi-purpose room and technology, engineering, and math lab; shall Sunol Glen Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing the issuance of $9,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $535,972 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at rates of approximately 5.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2800, "fingerprint": "2020|202000110|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000110|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3cf1b5b4d41962ec", "measure_id": "202000110", "measure_letter": "OO", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To create more opportunities for residents to volunteer, and to honor Hayward's commitment to diversity, shall the Charter of the City of Hayward be amended to eliminate the requirement of being a qualified elector/registered voter to serve on City Council-appointed advisory commissions, and shall the Charter be amended to eliminate gender-based designations and titles and instead use neutral, gender-free designations and titles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37696, "no_votes": 18530, "total_votes": 56226, "percent_yes": 67.0437164301213, "percent_no": 32.95628356987871, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment eliminates the requirement that members of City Counci...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment eliminates the requirement that members of City Council-appointed advisory commissions be registered voters, and replaces gender-based titles and designations in the city charter with gender-neutral language.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.754227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.335065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To create more opportunities for residents to volunteer, and to honor Hayward's commitment to diversity, shall the Charter of the City of Hayward be amended to eliminate the requirement of being a qualified elector/registered voter to serve on City Council-appointed advisory commissions, and shall the Charter be amended to eliminate gender-based designations and titles and instead use neutral, gender-free designations and titles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2785, "fingerprint": "2020|202000089|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000089|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9a016d0b1a7e3ddf", "measure_id": "202000089", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2089, approving a development agreement for the Wine Country Hotel at the Bankhead project (Development Agreement 19-001), be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19546, "no_votes": 9941, "total_votes": 29487, "percent_yes": 66.28683826771119, "percent_no": 33.71316173228881, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure approved a development agreement for the Wine Country Hotel at th...", "summary_text": "The measure approved a development agreement for the Wine Country Hotel at the Bankhead project in Alameda. The ordinance formally adopted Development Agreement 19-001 to allow the hotel development to proceed.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.749887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.332310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2089, approving a development agreement for the Wine Country Hotel at the Bankhead project (Development Agreement 19-001), be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2792, "fingerprint": "2020|202000111|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000111|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a99fe6f1a35cb4bd", "measure_id": "202000111", "measure_letter": "PP", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain critical City services, including 911 emergency response/fire protection/public safety; streets/pothole repair; parks/recreation; neighborhood police patrols, crime prevention, drug/gang-prevention programs; and other city services; shall the measure extending the City of Newark's existing voter-approved utility users tax 9 years at the current 3.25% rate, providing $2,750,000 annually, exempting seniors and low-income residents, requiring audits, with no increase in tax rate and no money for Sacramento, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13419, "no_votes": 5277, "total_votes": 18696, "percent_yes": 71.77471116816432, "percent_no": 28.225288831835684, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended Newark's existing 3", "summary_text": "This measure extended Newark's existing 3.25% utility users tax for 9 years, generating approximately $2.75 million annually for city services while maintaining exemptions for seniors and low-income residents. The extension continued the current tax rate without any increase and included audit requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.751985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.333591", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain critical City services, including 911 emergency response/fire protection/public safety; streets/pothole repair; parks/recreation; neighborhood police patrols, crime prevention, drug/gang-prevention programs; and other city services; shall the measure extending the City of Newark's existing voter-approved utility users tax 9 years at the current 3.25% rate, providing $2,750,000 annually, exempting seniors and low-income residents, requiring audits, with no increase in tax rate and no money for Sacramento, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2804, "fingerprint": "2020|202000090|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000090|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d3f2d55b3486ac58", "measure_id": "202000090", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure to provide: homelessness support services and programs to help homeless individuals move into shelters and housing; trash removal from parks and creeks; safe, well-maintained parks and trails; clean, accessible park restrooms; improved water quality; and park facilities repairs, by enacting an annual $148 parcel tax for single-family parcels, and other parcels as specified, for 20 years, raising approximately $21,000,000 annually with exemptions for low-income seniors, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89363, "no_votes": 41901, "total_votes": 131264, "percent_yes": 68.07883349585569, "percent_no": 31.92116650414431, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacts a $148 annual parcel tax on single-family and other speci...", "summary_text": "This measure enacts a $148 annual parcel tax on single-family and other specified parcels for 20 years to fund homelessness support services, park maintenance, trash removal, restroom improvements, water quality projects, and facility repairs, raising approximately $21 million annually. The tax includes exemptions for low-income seniors.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.755406", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.335798", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure to provide: homelessness support services and programs to help homeless individuals move into shelters and housing; trash removal from parks and creeks; safe, well-maintained parks and trails; clean, accessible park restrooms; improved water quality; and park facilities repairs, by enacting an annual $148 parcel tax for single-family parcels, and other parcels as specified, for 20 years, raising approximately $21,000,000 annually with exemptions for low-income seniors, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2801, "fingerprint": "2020|202000112|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000112|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "852eced3d7a62ce9", "measure_id": "202000112", "measure_letter": "QQ", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure amending the City of Oakland Charter to authorize the City Council, by adoption of an ordinance, to authorize persons aged 16 and above, who are otherwise eligible to vote under state and local law, to vote for the Office of School Board Director, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 131324, "no_votes": 62127, "total_votes": 193451, "percent_yes": 67.88489074752779, "percent_no": 32.11510925247221, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the City of Oakland Charter to allow the City Council to...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the City of Oakland Charter to allow the City Council to authorize 16 and 17-year-olds who are otherwise eligible to vote to participate in school board director elections through an ordinance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.754608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.335252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure amending the City of Oakland Charter to authorize the City Council, by adoption of an ordinance, to authorize persons aged 16 and above, who are otherwise eligible to vote under state and local law, to vote for the Office of School Board Director, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2795, "fingerprint": "2020|202000091|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000091|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c80b324bbf1f38b8", "measure_id": "202000091", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure amending Oakland's City Charter to eliminate obsolete requirements for designation of the City of Oakland's Official Newspaper, and authorizing the City Council to establish procedures by ordinance to designate the City of Oakland's official newspaper or newspapers be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82901, "no_votes": 29304, "total_votes": 112205, "percent_yes": 73.88351677732722, "percent_no": 26.116483222672784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would eliminate outdated requirements in Oakland's City Charter ...", "summary_text": "This measure would eliminate outdated requirements in Oakland's City Charter for designating an official city newspaper and instead allow the City Council to establish procedures through ordinance for selecting official newspapers.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.752795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.334145", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure amending Oakland's City Charter to eliminate obsolete requirements for designation of the City of Oakland's Official Newspaper, and authorizing the City Council to establish procedures by ordinance to designate the City of Oakland's official newspaper or newspapers be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2793, "fingerprint": "2020|202000113|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000113|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "4b73690b75f35424", "measure_id": "202000113", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Measure amending Oakland City Charter Section 217 to eliminate the $1,000 limit on fines for ordinance and municipal code violations, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108499, "no_votes": 77475, "total_votes": 185974, "percent_yes": 58.34095088560767, "percent_no": 41.65904911439233, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Oakland's City Charter to remove the $1,000 maximum limi...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Oakland's City Charter to remove the $1,000 maximum limit on fines that could be imposed for violations of city ordinances and municipal code. The change allows the city to impose fines above $1,000 for such violations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.752250", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.333773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Measure amending Oakland City Charter Section 217 to eliminate the $1,000 limit on fines for ordinance and municipal code violations, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11081, "fingerprint": "2020|202000092|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000092|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c3083f7bb9e80fa0", "measure_id": "202000092", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure increasing the appropriations limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (which limits city expenditures of tax proceeds) to allow the City of Oakland to continue to expend revenues from taxes previously approved by Oakland voters for emergency medical services, paramedic services, library services, public safety and violence prevention services, homeless services and other lawful governmental purposes, without increasing or imposing new taxes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82583, "no_votes": 31562, "total_votes": 114145, "percent_yes": 72.34920495860528, "percent_no": 27.650795041394716, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Oakland's constitutional spending limit to allow the c...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Oakland's constitutional spending limit to allow the city to spend revenues from previously voter-approved taxes on emergency medical services, libraries, public safety, violence prevention, and homeless services without imposing new taxes. The measure passed with 72.3% voter approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.353249", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.755676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.335979", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure increasing the appropriations limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (which limits city expenditures of tax proceeds) to allow the City of Oakland to continue to expend revenues from taxes previously approved by Oakland voters for emergency medical services, paramedic services, library services, public safety and violence prevention services, homeless services and other lawful governmental purposes, without increasing or imposing new taxes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2794, "fingerprint": "2020|202000114|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000114|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6ba3dd9a388db301", "measure_id": "202000114", "measure_letter": "S1", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Oakland\u2019s City Charter be amended to: (1) modify the powers, duties and staffing of the Police Commission and the Community Police Review Agency (\u201cCPRA\u201d), including empowering the Police Commission to hire and/or contract for one or more attorney advisors and empowering the CPRA\u2019s Director to hire staff attorneys; and (2) create an Office of Inspector General to review and report on the policies and practices of the Police Department and CPRA?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 154314, "no_votes": 35566, "total_votes": 189880, "percent_yes": 81.26922266694756, "percent_no": 18.730777333052444, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Oakland's City Charter to expand the powers and staffing...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Oakland's City Charter to expand the powers and staffing of the Police Commission and Community Police Review Agency, including allowing them to hire attorney advisors and staff attorneys. It also established an Office of Inspector General to review and report on the policies and practices of the Police Department and CPRA.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.752525", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.333954", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Oakland\u2019s City Charter be amended to: (1) modify the powers, duties and staffing of the Police Commission and the Community Police Review Agency (\u201cCPRA\u201d), including empowering the Police Commission to hire and/or contract for one or more attorney advisors and empowering the CPRA\u2019s Director to hire staff attorneys; and (2) create an Office of Inspector General to review and report on the policies and practices of the Police Department and CPRA?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2805, "fingerprint": "2020|202000093|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000093|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b13c84fa0c7f206d", "measure_id": "202000093", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 746 N.S, which maintains essential police, fire, and paramedic services, prevents the reduction in maintenance of City parks, greenspaces and other public areas, and prevents the loss of recreational and other public services, by renewing the City of Piedmont's expiring parcel tax for four years, with annual rates depending on use between $551 and $1,395 per parcel, or $383 per dwelling unit, subject to CPI adjustment, raising approximately $2,424,620 annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4874, "no_votes": 999, "total_votes": 5873, "percent_yes": 82.98995402690278, "percent_no": 17.01004597309722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed the City of Piedmont's expiring parcel tax for four year...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed the City of Piedmont's expiring parcel tax for four years at annual rates between $551 and $1,395 per parcel (or $383 per dwelling unit), with rates subject to consumer price index adjustments. The tax is expected to generate approximately $2,424,620 annually to fund police, fire, paramedic services, park maintenance, and other public services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.755964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.336159", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 746 N.S, which maintains essential police, fire, and paramedic services, prevents the reduction in maintenance of City parks, greenspaces and other public areas, and prevents the loss of recreational and other public services, by renewing the City of Piedmont's expiring parcel tax for four years, with annual rates depending on use between $551 and $1,395 per parcel, or $383 per dwelling unit, subject to CPI adjustment, raising approximately $2,424,620 annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2812, "fingerprint": "2020|202000115|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000115|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "167b42884e089493", "measure_id": "202000115", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Piedmont, to be in alignment with neighboring East Bay Cities, increase the real estate transfer tax from $13.00 to $17.50 per $1,000 of transfer price, generating $948,462 annually until ended by voters, to provide general tax revenue for city services and to repair and maintain city facilities including police and fire stations, parks, and recreation facilities, and other city infrastructure, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3703, "no_votes": 4041, "total_votes": 7744, "percent_yes": 47.8176652892562, "percent_no": 52.1823347107438, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased Piedmont's real estate transfer tax from $13", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased Piedmont's real estate transfer tax from $13.00 to $17.50 per $1,000 of property transfer price to generate approximately $948,462 annually for general city services and infrastructure maintenance. The additional revenue would have funded repairs and maintenance of city facilities including police and fire stations, parks, recreation facilities, and other municipal infrastructure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.758026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.337481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Piedmont, to be in alignment with neighboring East Bay Cities, increase the real estate transfer tax from $13.00 to $17.50 per $1,000 of transfer price, generating $948,462 annually until ended by voters, to provide general tax revenue for city services and to repair and maintain city facilities including police and fire stations, parks, and recreation facilities, and other city infrastructure, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2788, "fingerprint": "2020|202000094|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000094|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "309a1d68729be8fd", "measure_id": "202000094", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, paramedic services, fire prevention/protection, disaster preparedness, neighborhood police patrols, youth violence/gang prevention and safety at public schools shall Union City's measure extending expiring public safety funding be adopted at $168 per parcel for the most common residential parcel (rates for other property types as described in the ballot pamphlet), providing approximately $5,000,000 annually for eight years, with annual inflation adjustments, independent citizen oversight and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9062, "no_votes": 5434, "total_votes": 14496, "percent_yes": 62.51379690949227, "percent_no": 37.48620309050773, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have extended Union City's existing public safety parcel t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have extended Union City's existing public safety parcel tax at $168 per year for typical residential parcels, generating approximately $5 million annually for eight years to fund emergency services, fire protection, police patrols, and school safety programs. The measure failed despite receiving 62.5% approval because it required a two-thirds supermajority to pass.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.750786", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.332860", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, paramedic services, fire prevention/protection, disaster preparedness, neighborhood police patrols, youth violence/gang prevention and safety at public schools shall Union City's measure extending expiring public safety funding be adopted at $168 per parcel for the most common residential parcel (rates for other property types as described in the ballot pamphlet), providing approximately $5,000,000 annually for eight years, with annual inflation adjustments, independent citizen oversight and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2802, "fingerprint": "2020|202000116|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000116|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "802b0268b785ef7c", "measure_id": "202000116", "measure_letter": "UU", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to prevent permanent closure of Piedmont's Community Pool by constructing new pool facilities, restrooms and related areas, to conserve energy and water, provide greater community access and safety, and authorize Piedmont to issue $19,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, generating $1,257,950 annually at an average rate of 2.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with all money staying local and independent citizens' oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5336, "no_votes": 2451, "total_votes": 7787, "percent_yes": 68.52446385000643, "percent_no": 31.475536149993573, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Piedmont to issue $19", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Piedmont to issue $19.5 million in bonds to construct new pool facilities, restrooms, and related areas to replace the existing Community Pool. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of 2.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $1.26 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.754878", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.335437", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to prevent permanent closure of Piedmont's Community Pool by constructing new pool facilities, restrooms and related areas, to conserve energy and water, provide greater community access and safety, and authorize Piedmont to issue $19,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, generating $1,257,950 annually at an average rate of 2.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with all money staying local and independent citizens' oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2783, "fingerprint": "2020|202000006|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000006|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b38b588521ebe84d", "measure_id": "202000006", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved to extend until 6/30/2033, with no increase to the current 6.5% tax rate, the existing Utility Users Tax, collected only in the unincorporated areas (Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview, San Lorenzo, Sunol), providing approximately $12 million annually which may fund County Services, including services to unincorporated areas (e.g., Sheriff, Library, Planning, Code Enforcement), retaining current exemptions and exclusions, including exemptions for low income or lifeline utility users, and making clarifying/administrative changes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 470627, "no_votes": 210633, "total_votes": 681260, "percent_yes": 69.08184833984087, "percent_no": 30.918151660159126, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Alameda County's existing 6", "summary_text": "This measure extends Alameda County's existing 6.5% Utility Users Tax in unincorporated areas until June 30, 2033, without raising the tax rate, generating approximately $12 million annually for county services. The extension maintains current exemptions for low-income and lifeline utility users and includes administrative clarifications to the ordinance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.749214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.331947", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved to extend until 6/30/2033, with no increase to the current 6.5% tax rate, the existing Utility Users Tax, collected only in the unincorporated areas (Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview, San Lorenzo, Sunol), providing approximately $12 million annually which may fund County Services, including services to unincorporated areas (e.g., Sheriff, Library, Planning, Code Enforcement), retaining current exemptions and exclusions, including exemptions for low income or lifeline utility users, and making clarifying/administrative changes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2813, "fingerprint": "2020|202000117|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000117|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "da4711789c1bed0a", "measure_id": "202000117", "measure_letter": "VV", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City of San Leandro services, with revenue that cannot be taken by the State, including: repairing potholes/streets; supporting seniors, families and local small businesses through COVID-19 economic recovery; preserving 911 emergency response; maintaining youth violence prevention programs; and general city services; shall San Leandro increase the existing real property transfer tax rate, collected when property is sold, by $5 per $1,000 in valuation, generating an additional $4,000,000 annually, until repealed by voters, all funds benefiting San Leandro?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20156, "no_votes": 17676, "total_votes": 37832, "percent_yes": 53.2776485514908, "percent_no": 46.7223514485092, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased San Leandro's real property transfer tax by $5 per $1,...", "summary_text": "This measure increased San Leandro's real property transfer tax by $5 per $1,000 of property value when real estate is sold. The tax increase was projected to generate approximately $4 million annually for city services until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.758295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.337670", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City of San Leandro services, with revenue that cannot be taken by the State, including: repairing potholes/streets; supporting seniors, families and local small businesses through COVID-19 economic recovery; preserving 911 emergency response; maintaining youth violence prevention programs; and general city services; shall San Leandro increase the existing real property transfer tax rate, collected when property is sold, by $5 per $1,000 in valuation, generating an additional $4,000,000 annually, until repealed by voters, all funds benefiting San Leandro?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2784, "fingerprint": "2020|202000007|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000007|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3a8304c6ec6a76d0", "measure_id": "202000007", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a County of Alameda ordinance be adopted to establish a half percent sales tax for 10 years, to provide essential County services, including housing and services for those experiencing homelessness, mental health services, job training, social safety net and other general fund services, providing approximately $150,000,000 annually, with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 358123, "no_votes": 356812, "total_votes": 714935, "percent_yes": 50.09168665682894, "percent_no": 49.90831334317106, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.5% sales tax in Alameda County for 10 years to fund county services including homeless housing and services, mental health programs, job training, and other general fund services, generating approximately $150 million annually with required audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.749578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.332128", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a County of Alameda ordinance be adopted to establish a half percent sales tax for 10 years, to provide essential County services, including housing and services for those experiencing homelessness, mental health services, job training, social safety net and other general fund services, providing approximately $150,000,000 annually, with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2814, "fingerprint": "2020|202000118|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000118|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "beb61af0f5cf6ff2", "measure_id": "202000118", "measure_letter": "WW", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect essential city services including senior citizen support/ meal programs during COVID-19 crisis/ recovery; 911 emergency/ paramedic response; street/ pothole repair; fire protection; disaster/ health crisis preparedness; youth violence prevention/ drug intervention programs; and other city services, shall the measure establishing a 5% utility users tax on gas, electricity, video, telecommunications services for 8 years, providing $6,100,000 annually in locally-controlled funding, requiring citizen oversight/ independent audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17301, "no_votes": 13120, "total_votes": 30421, "percent_yes": 56.87189770224516, "percent_no": 43.12810229775484, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 5% utility users tax on gas, electricity, video, a...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 5% utility users tax on gas, electricity, video, and telecommunications services for 8 years in Alameda, California. The tax generates approximately $6.1 million annually in locally-controlled revenue for city services, with required citizen oversight and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.758578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.337852", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect essential city services including senior citizen support/ meal programs during COVID-19 crisis/ recovery; 911 emergency/ paramedic response; street/ pothole repair; fire protection; disaster/ health crisis preparedness; youth violence prevention/ drug intervention programs; and other city services, shall the measure establishing a 5% utility users tax on gas, electricity, video, telecommunications services for 8 years, providing $6,100,000 annually in locally-controlled funding, requiring citizen oversight/ independent audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2781, "fingerprint": "2020|202000008|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000008|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "19256451727afa32", "measure_id": "202000008", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure authorizing the Alameda County Fire Department to issue $90,000,000 in general obligation bonds to repair / replace outdated stations, thereby maintaining services in unincorporated communities (including medical emergency lifesaving services, fast 911 response, wildfire protection and disaster response) in an estimated levy of 1.6 cents per $100 assessed value, raising on average $5,200,000 annually for approximately 31 years, with oversight and audits, and no funds for salaries, benefits or pensions be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38796, "no_votes": 19300, "total_votes": 58096, "percent_yes": 66.77912420820711, "percent_no": 33.22087579179289, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Alameda County Fire Department to issue $90 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Alameda County Fire Department to issue $90 million in general obligation bonds to repair and replace outdated fire stations serving unincorporated communities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 1.6 cents per $100 of assessed value for about 31 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.748614", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.331581", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure authorizing the Alameda County Fire Department to issue $90,000,000 in general obligation bonds to repair / replace outdated stations, thereby maintaining services in unincorporated communities (including medical emergency lifesaving services, fast 911 response, wildfire protection and disaster response) in an estimated levy of 1.6 cents per $100 assessed value, raising on average $5,200,000 annually for approximately 31 years, with oversight and audits, and no funds for salaries, benefits or pensions be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2827, "fingerprint": "2020|202000471|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000471|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b29a48d8b70d2092", "measure_id": "202000471", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Oakland Unified School District's measure to issue $735 million in bonds for: classroom repair and school safety improvements including upgrading classrooms, science labs, and technology; improving student safety and security; repairing bathrooms, electrical systems, and plumbing/sewers; and improving energy efficiency/earthquake safety; at legal rates, levying about $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising an average of $48.5 million annually for approximately 30 years, with citizens' oversight, audits, and no money for administrator salaries be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 150115, "no_votes": 43212, "total_votes": 193327, "percent_yes": 77.64823330419445, "percent_no": 22.35176669580555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Oakland Unified School District to issue $735 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Oakland Unified School District to issue $735 million in bonds to fund classroom repairs, school safety improvements, infrastructure upgrades, and energy efficiency projects. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value over about 30 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.762805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.340512", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Oakland Unified School District's measure to issue $735 million in bonds for: classroom repair and school safety improvements including upgrading classrooms, science labs, and technology; improving student safety and security; repairing bathrooms, electrical systems, and plumbing/sewers; and improving energy efficiency/earthquake safety; at legal rates, levying about $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising an average of $48.5 million annually for approximately 30 years, with citizens' oversight, audits, and no money for administrator salaries be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2786, "fingerprint": "2020|202000096|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000096|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8a367122b6557453", "measure_id": "202000096", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the City Charter to repeal the prohibition against the building of multi-family housing in Alameda and amending the City Charter and the General Plan to repeal the citywide density limitation of one housing unit per 2,000 square feet of land be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16749, "no_votes": 25063, "total_votes": 41812, "percent_yes": 40.057878121113546, "percent_no": 59.942121878886454, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have repealed Alameda's prohibition on multi-family housin...", "summary_text": "This measure would have repealed Alameda's prohibition on multi-family housing construction and eliminated the citywide density limit of one housing unit per 2,000 square feet of land. The charter amendment failed with 40.1% voter support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.750240", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.332493", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the City Charter to repeal the prohibition against the building of multi-family housing in Alameda and amending the City Charter and the General Plan to repeal the citywide density limitation of one housing unit per 2,000 square feet of land be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2828, "fingerprint": "2020|202000009|ALPINE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000009|ALPINE", "content_hash": "2acb2b1d3b5478be", "measure_id": "202000009", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Alpine", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors of the County of Alpine enact an ordinance regulating the import of effluent into the County of Alpine from any source and set a permit fee for such imports?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 626, "no_votes": 86, "total_votes": 712, "percent_yes": 87.92134831460675, "percent_no": 12.078651685393254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Alpine County Board of Supervisors to create an o...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Alpine County Board of Supervisors to create an ordinance that would regulate the importation of wastewater effluent from outside sources into the county and establish permit fees for such imports.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.763070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.340741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors of the County of Alpine enact an ordinance regulating the import of effluent into the County of Alpine from any source and set a permit fee for such imports?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alpine_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2831, "fingerprint": "2020|202000121|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000121|AMADOR", "content_hash": "4036c9b0346dbc72", "measure_id": "202000121", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Sutter Creek adopt an ordinance increasing the transient occupancy tax paid by guests staying for a period of 30 consecutive days or less at hotels, inns, tourist homes or houses, motels, or lodging facilities of any kind within the City of Sutter Creek by 2% (from 10% to 12%), providing approximately $55,000 in increased annual revenue to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 944, "no_votes": 649, "total_votes": 1593, "percent_yes": 59.25925925925925, "percent_no": 40.74074074074075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax in Sutter Creek from 10% t...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax in Sutter Creek from 10% to 12% for guests staying 30 consecutive days or less at hotels and other lodging facilities. The increase was expected to generate approximately $55,000 in additional annual revenue for the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.763874", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.341440", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Sutter Creek adopt an ordinance increasing the transient occupancy tax paid by guests staying for a period of 30 consecutive days or less at hotels, inns, tourist homes or houses, motels, or lodging facilities of any kind within the City of Sutter Creek by 2% (from 10% to 12%), providing approximately $55,000 in increased annual revenue to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2829, "fingerprint": "2020|202000119|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000119|AMADOR", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "202000119", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be Appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 244, "no_votes": 298, "total_votes": 542, "percent_yes": 45.01845018450184, "percent_no": 54.98154981549816, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.763336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.340980", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be Appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2830, "fingerprint": "2020|202000120|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000120|AMADOR", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "202000120", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be Appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 241, "no_votes": 298, "total_votes": 539, "percent_yes": 44.71243042671614, "percent_no": 55.28756957328386, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.763609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.341209", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be Appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2834, "fingerprint": "2020|202000472|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000472|BUTTE", "content_hash": "535ed9ad4495c650", "measure_id": "202000472", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30, "no_votes": 121, "total_votes": 151, "percent_yes": 19.86754966887417, "percent_no": 80.13245033112582, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to issue $228.4 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct classrooms and buildings for career and technical education programs across its campuses. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $13.3 million annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.765137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.342154", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2832, "fingerprint": "2020|202000122|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000122|BUTTE", "content_hash": "8c940e55597d2c26", "measure_id": "202000122", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 402, 500 and 600 of the Chico City Charter be amended to provide for nomination and election of City Council Members by Council District instead of at\u2010large voting, with Council District boundaries drawn to be as nearly equal in population as practical after each decennial federal census in compliance with state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22225, "no_votes": 22130, "total_votes": 44355, "percent_yes": 50.10709051967084, "percent_no": 49.89290948032916, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Chico City Charter to change City Council elections ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Chico City Charter to change City Council elections from at-large voting to a district-based system where council members are nominated and elected by specific geographic districts. The measure also requires district boundaries to be redrawn after each federal census to maintain roughly equal population sizes in compliance with state law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.764329", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.341669", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 402, 500 and 600 of the Chico City Charter be amended to provide for nomination and election of City Council Members by Council District instead of at\u2010large voting, with Council District boundaries drawn to be as nearly equal in population as practical after each decennial federal census in compliance with state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2833, "fingerprint": "2020|202000123|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000123|BUTTE", "content_hash": "e6dca2a7c0da7a7b", "measure_id": "202000123", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 403 of the Chico City Charter be amended to remove the requirement that candidates for City Councilmember be over the age of twenty\u2010one (21) years at the time nomination papers are issued?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17055, "no_votes": 29460, "total_votes": 46515, "percent_yes": 36.66559174459852, "percent_no": 63.33440825540148, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have removed the requirement that candidates for Chico Cit...", "summary_text": "This measure would have removed the requirement that candidates for Chico City Council be over 21 years old when nomination papers are issued. The amendment failed with 36.7% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.764780", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.341914", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 403 of the Chico City Charter be amended to remove the requirement that candidates for City Councilmember be over the age of twenty\u2010one (21) years at the time nomination papers are issued?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2835, "fingerprint": "2020|202000010|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000010|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "f01165b99ebdaeef", "measure_id": "202000010", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "For general revenue purposes, including the improvement of essential County services such as road maintenance, crime prevention, and environmental regulation, shall the measure establishing maximum cannabis activities tax rates not to exceed $7.00 per square-foot for cultivation canopy area and 8% of gross receipts for all other cannabis activities, in unincorporated Calaveras County, generating an estimated $1.5 - $3,000,000 annually, with all funds used locally and annual audits, unless/until repealed, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16522, "no_votes": 9276, "total_votes": 25798, "percent_yes": 64.0437243197147, "percent_no": 35.9562756802853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established maximum tax rates on cannabis activities in unincorp...", "summary_text": "This measure established maximum tax rates on cannabis activities in unincorporated Calaveras County, with cultivation taxed at up to $7.00 per square foot of canopy area and other cannabis activities taxed at up to 8% of gross receipts. The tax revenue would fund general county services including road maintenance, crime prevention, and environmental regulation, with an estimated annual generation of $1.5-3 million.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.765421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.342386", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For general revenue purposes, including the improvement of essential County services such as road maintenance, crime prevention, and environmental regulation, shall the measure establishing maximum cannabis activities tax rates not to exceed $7.00 per square-foot for cultivation canopy area and 8% of gross receipts for all other cannabis activities, in unincorporated Calaveras County, generating an estimated $1.5 - $3,000,000 annually, with all funds used locally and annual audits, unless/until repealed, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2836, "fingerprint": "2020|202000473|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000473|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "eaf4d6955f9fbbf1", "measure_id": "202000473", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Under a no-tax-rate-increase financing plan, shall the Calaveras Unified School District measure to renovate and improve aging classrooms and schools, including: career technical education facilities, heating, air conditioning, plumbing and electrical systems, and access to modern technology, authorizing $32,800,000 in bonds, be adopted, with legal rates, estimated levy averaging less than 4 cents per $100 of assessed value ($1.8 million annually) through 2050, citizen oversight, annual audits, and no funds spent on administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7292, "no_votes": 6947, "total_votes": 14239, "percent_yes": 51.21146147903645, "percent_no": 48.78853852096355, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Calaveras Unified School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Calaveras Unified School District to issue $32.8 million in bonds to renovate classrooms and schools, upgrade building systems, and improve career technical education facilities and technology access. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes estimated at less than 4 cents per $100 of assessed value through 2050.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.765898", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.342589", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Under a no-tax-rate-increase financing plan, shall the Calaveras Unified School District measure to renovate and improve aging classrooms and schools, including: career technical education facilities, heating, air conditioning, plumbing and electrical systems, and access to modern technology, authorizing $32,800,000 in bonds, be adopted, with legal rates, estimated levy averaging less than 4 cents per $100 of assessed value ($1.8 million annually) through 2050, citizen oversight, annual audits, and no funds spent on administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2837, "fingerprint": "2020|202000474|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000474|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "f7fd478cb6604300", "measure_id": "202000474", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Under a no-tax-rate-increase-financing-plan, shall Vallecito Union School District's measure to remove asbestos from school buildings, repair dry rot damage, and renovate the track and field at Avery Middle School by authorizing $2. 8 million in bonds be adopted with an estimated levy for these bonds of less than one cent per $100 of assessed valuation averaging $252,000 raised per year anticipated through 2036, at legal rates, with annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3933, "no_votes": 2099, "total_votes": 6032, "percent_yes": 65.20225464190982, "percent_no": 34.79774535809018, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Vallecito Union School District to issue $2", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Vallecito Union School District to issue $2.8 million in bonds to remove asbestos from school buildings, repair dry rot damage, and renovate the track and field at Avery Middle School. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of less than one cent per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $252,000 annually through 2036.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.766173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.342772", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Under a no-tax-rate-increase-financing-plan, shall Vallecito Union School District's measure to remove asbestos from school buildings, repair dry rot damage, and renovate the track and field at Avery Middle School by authorizing $2. 8 million in bonds be adopted with an estimated levy for these bonds of less than one cent per $100 of assessed valuation averaging $252,000 raised per year anticipated through 2036, at legal rates, with annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2839, "fingerprint": "2020|202000475|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000475|COLUSA", "content_hash": "a2167aad5beaeeb1", "measure_id": "202000475", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair/replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; shall Williams Unified School District issue $19,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $1,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 448, "no_votes": 528, "total_votes": 976, "percent_yes": 45.90163934426229, "percent_no": 54.09836065573771, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Williams Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Williams Unified School District to issue $19 million in bonds to upgrade electrical systems, modernize classrooms and facilities, and repair plumbing and sewer systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.766769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.343145", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair/replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; shall Williams Unified School District issue $19,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $1,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2838, "fingerprint": "2020|202000124|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000124|COLUSA", "content_hash": "9022d20fa854be8a", "measure_id": "202000124", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted increasing the City's sales tax rate from 1/2% to 1%, providing approximately $600,000 annually until ended by voters, to fund general City services, such as public safety, street maintenance and repair, and youth and senior programs, requiring annual independent audits with all funds benefiting Williams residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 560, "no_votes": 755, "total_votes": 1315, "percent_yes": 42.58555133079848, "percent_no": 57.41444866920152, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased Williams' city sales tax rate from 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased Williams' city sales tax rate from 0.5% to 1%, generating approximately $600,000 annually for general city services including public safety, street maintenance, and youth and senior programs. The measure required annual independent audits and would remain in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.766443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.342960", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted increasing the City's sales tax rate from 1/2% to 1%, providing approximately $600,000 annually until ended by voters, to fund general City services, such as public safety, street maintenance and repair, and youth and senior programs, requiring annual independent audits with all funds benefiting Williams residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2840, "fingerprint": "2020|202000476|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000476|COLUSA", "content_hash": "535ed9ad4495c650", "measure_id": "202000476", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1466, "no_votes": 3165, "total_votes": 4631, "percent_yes": 31.65622975599222, "percent_no": 68.34377024400777, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to issu...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to issue $228.4 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct classrooms and buildings for career and technical education programs at its colleges and campuses. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $13.3 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.767081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.343344", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2851, "fingerprint": "2020|202000478|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000478|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ad756d8a3d784142", "measure_id": "202000478", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect the quality of education and prevent deep cuts to Lafayette elementary and middle school programs in math, science, engineering, technology, reading, music, and the arts, maintain manageable class sizes to enhance student achievement, and attract and retain highly qualified teachers, shall Lafayette School District establish a $290 parcel tax for 7 years only, providing $3,011,360 annually in dedicated funding for neighborhood schools, with independent citizen oversight, an exemption for seniors, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9905, "no_votes": 3639, "total_votes": 13544, "percent_yes": 73.1320141760189, "percent_no": 26.8679858239811, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a $290 annual parcel tax for 7 years in the Lafayett...", "summary_text": "This measure established a $290 annual parcel tax for 7 years in the Lafayette School District to provide $3,011,360 annually for educational programs and services. The tax includes a senior exemption and independent citizen oversight, with all funds remaining within the local school district.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.770823", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.345602", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of education and prevent deep cuts to Lafayette elementary and middle school programs in math, science, engineering, technology, reading, music, and the arts, maintain manageable class sizes to enhance student achievement, and attract and retain highly qualified teachers, shall Lafayette School District establish a $290 parcel tax for 7 years only, providing $3,011,360 annually in dedicated funding for neighborhood schools, with independent citizen oversight, an exemption for seniors, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2852, "fingerprint": "2020|202000479|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000479|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f30e72b3e54a878f", "measure_id": "202000479", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high quality elementary/intermediate schools, shall Moraga School District continue funding to support effective science, technology, engineering, math, arts and music programs; maintain manageable class sizes; keep schools safe; and attract and retain the best qualified teachers; by adopting a measure renewing funding at the current $192 rate per parcel, providing $1 million annually, until repealed by voters, with low-income senior exemptions, cost of living adjustments and independent oversight with all funds supporting Moraga students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5227, "no_votes": 2154, "total_votes": 7381, "percent_yes": 70.81696247120986, "percent_no": 29.183037528790138, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed a $192 annual parcel tax for the Moraga School District ...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed a $192 annual parcel tax for the Moraga School District to fund science, technology, engineering, math, arts and music programs, maintain class sizes, and support teacher retention. The tax provides $1 million annually with exemptions for low-income seniors and includes cost of living adjustments and independent oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.771092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.345784", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high quality elementary/intermediate schools, shall Moraga School District continue funding to support effective science, technology, engineering, math, arts and music programs; maintain manageable class sizes; keep schools safe; and attract and retain the best qualified teachers; by adopting a measure renewing funding at the current $192 rate per parcel, providing $1 million annually, until repealed by voters, with low-income senior exemptions, cost of living adjustments and independent oversight with all funds supporting Moraga students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2846, "fingerprint": "2020|202000129|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000129|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "202000129", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9731, "no_votes": 17789, "total_votes": 27520, "percent_yes": 35.35973837209302, "percent_no": 64.64026162790698, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.768955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.344481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11083, "fingerprint": "2020|202000480|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000480|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "09e03e1e9ee41d4f", "measure_id": "202000480", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, upgrade neighborhood schools, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District modernize core classrooms; provide safe, secure school environments, including updated technology and air conditioning, that improve academic achievement and provide relevant career pathways for all students, by issuing $575 million of bonds, at legal rates, averaging $34.48 million annually while bonds are outstanding, at 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with strict citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35972, "no_votes": 25281, "total_votes": 61253, "percent_yes": 58.72691949782052, "percent_no": 41.27308050217948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the West Contra Costa Unified School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the West Contra Costa Unified School District to issue $575 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including upgrading classrooms, technology, air conditioning, and security systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.362821", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.771363", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.345966", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, upgrade neighborhood schools, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District modernize core classrooms; provide safe, secure school environments, including updated technology and air conditioning, that improve academic achievement and provide relevant career pathways for all students, by issuing $575 million of bonds, at legal rates, averaging $34.48 million annually while bonds are outstanding, at 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, with strict citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2848, "fingerprint": "2020|202000128|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000128|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "93fe4eb6aa2a3af5", "measure_id": "202000128", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help maintain and enhance essential City services, including wildfire risk reduction throughout Orinda, preparation for emergencies and disasters, repair of public storm drains, continued public street maintenance, and other city services, shall the City of Orinda increase its existing one-half cent sales tax to one cent, which would generate approximately $2.4 million annually for a period of twenty years, with financial audits, public review of all expenditures, and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7591, "no_votes": 5338, "total_votes": 12929, "percent_yes": 58.71297084074561, "percent_no": 41.28702915925439, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Orinda's sales tax from 0", "summary_text": "This measure increased Orinda's sales tax from 0.5% to 1% for twenty years to generate approximately $2.4 million annually for city services including wildfire risk reduction, emergency preparation, storm drain repairs, and street maintenance. The measure includes provisions for financial audits, public expenditure review, and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.769595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.344854", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help maintain and enhance essential City services, including wildfire risk reduction throughout Orinda, preparation for emergencies and disasters, repair of public storm drains, continued public street maintenance, and other city services, shall the City of Orinda increase its existing one-half cent sales tax to one cent, which would generate approximately $2.4 million annually for a period of twenty years, with financial audits, public review of all expenditures, and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2850, "fingerprint": "2020|202000131|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000131|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "982203eaa4cabf3d", "measure_id": "202000131", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue funding that cannot be seized by the State, but stays in San Pablo for Public Safety, gang prevention, youth services, job creation, training and job placement for local residents (including the disenfranchised) and all other general city services, shall San Pablo reenact a half-cent sales tax for 5 years (generating approximately $1,450,000 annually), then reduced to one-quarter cent for 5 years (generating approximately $725,000 annually), then terminate; and include citizen oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6901, "no_votes": 1813, "total_votes": 8714, "percent_yes": 79.19439981638742, "percent_no": 20.805600183612583, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reenacted a half-cent sales tax in San Pablo for 5 years (genera...", "summary_text": "This measure reenacted a half-cent sales tax in San Pablo for 5 years (generating approximately $1.45 million annually), then reducing to a quarter-cent for another 5 years (generating approximately $725,000 annually) before terminating, with funds designated for public safety, gang prevention, youth services, job programs, and general city services. The measure included provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits of the tax revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.770164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.345230", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding that cannot be seized by the State, but stays in San Pablo for Public Safety, gang prevention, youth services, job creation, training and job placement for local residents (including the disenfranchised) and all other general city services, shall San Pablo reenact a half-cent sales tax for 5 years (generating approximately $1,450,000 annually), then reduced to one-quarter cent for 5 years (generating approximately $725,000 annually), then terminate; and include citizen oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11082, "fingerprint": "2020|202000477|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000477|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5de24d77024ee117", "measure_id": "202000477", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Antioch Schools by renovating classrooms, upgrading school safety and security systems, improving technology and energy efficiency, upgrading science labs, modernizing schools, and repairing / replacing roofs, shall School Facilities Improvement District #2 of the Antioch Unified School District issue $105,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average of $7,000,000 annually for 36 years, at a rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value with independent oversight and accountability?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5003, "no_votes": 4157, "total_votes": 9160, "percent_yes": 54.61790393013101, "percent_no": 45.38209606986899, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Antioch Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Antioch Unified School District to issue $105 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including classroom renovations, safety upgrades, technology improvements, and roof repairs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value over 36 years.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.362255", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.770466", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.345419", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Antioch Schools by renovating classrooms, upgrading school safety and security systems, improving technology and energy efficiency, upgrading science labs, modernizing schools, and repairing / replacing roofs, shall School Facilities Improvement District #2 of the Antioch Unified School District issue $105,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average of $7,000,000 annually for 36 years, at a rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value with independent oversight and accountability?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2845, "fingerprint": "2020|202000126|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000126|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "95d4c39f173211e4", "measure_id": "202000126", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall The Electors Adopt the Initiative to Change General Plan Designations within the Sand Creek Focus Area and Permanently Require Voter Approval of Amendments to Urban Limit Line?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34840, "no_votes": 9323, "total_votes": 44163, "percent_yes": 78.88956819056676, "percent_no": 21.110431809433237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative changed General Plan designations within the Sand Creek Focus...", "summary_text": "This initiative changed General Plan designations within the Sand Creek Focus Area and established a permanent requirement for voter approval of any future amendments to the Urban Limit Line in Contra Costa County.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.768569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.344288", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall The Electors Adopt the Initiative to Change General Plan Designations within the Sand Creek Focus Area and Permanently Require Voter Approval of Amendments to Urban Limit Line?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2849, "fingerprint": "2020|202000130|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000130|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "624893f05029baa9", "measure_id": "202000130", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain quality of life in Richmond by continuing certain City services, including 911 emergency response, pothole/street repair, homeless/youth services and other general services, shall an ordinance amending the City\u2019s business tax to charge businesses 0.06% to 5.00% of gross receipts, and other rates as stated, with the highest rates on cannabis, firearm and the biggest businesses, providing approximately $9.5 million annually until ended by voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30974, "no_votes": 11732, "total_votes": 42706, "percent_yes": 72.52845033484756, "percent_no": 27.471549665152438, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Richmond's business tax to charge businesses 0", "summary_text": "This measure amended Richmond's business tax to charge businesses 0.06% to 5.00% of gross receipts with the highest rates applied to cannabis, firearm, and the largest businesses. The tax generates approximately $9.5 million annually to fund city services including emergency response, street repair, and homeless services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.769868", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.345042", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality of life in Richmond by continuing certain City services, including 911 emergency response, pothole/street repair, homeless/youth services and other general services, shall an ordinance amending the City\u2019s business tax to charge businesses 0.06% to 5.00% of gross receipts, and other rates as stated, with the highest rates on cannabis, firearm and the biggest businesses, providing approximately $9.5 million annually until ended by voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2847, "fingerprint": "2020|202000127|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000127|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "91fb548719808042", "measure_id": "202000127", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue locally controlled funding that the State cannot take, to protect/maintain Concord\u2019s city services, such as 911 emergency/disaster response/preparedness; supporting local residents/businesses through recovery; street/pothole repair; gang prevention; crime investigation; community policing; addressing homelessness; and other city services; shall the measure extending/increasing the existing voter-approved sales tax from 0.5% to 1% to raise $27,000,000 annually until ended by voters, including annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28771, "no_votes": 28231, "total_votes": 57002, "percent_yes": 50.47366759061086, "percent_no": 49.52633240938914, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure extends and increases Concord's existing sales tax from 0", "summary_text": "The measure extends and increases Concord's existing sales tax from 0.5% to 1%, generating approximately $27 million annually for city services including emergency response, street repair, public safety, and homeless services. The tax continues until ended by voters and includes annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.769316", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.344662", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue locally controlled funding that the State cannot take, to protect/maintain Concord\u2019s city services, such as 911 emergency/disaster response/preparedness; supporting local residents/businesses through recovery; street/pothole repair; gang prevention; crime investigation; community policing; addressing homelessness; and other city services; shall the measure extending/increasing the existing voter-approved sales tax from 0.5% to 1% to raise $27,000,000 annually until ended by voters, including annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2842, "fingerprint": "2020|202000013|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000013|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "000689ab9eb8da81", "measure_id": "202000013", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area R-7 (Alamo Parks and Recreation) be increased to $1,750,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the Fiscal Years 2019/2020 through 2023/2024 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6764, "no_votes": 3233, "total_votes": 9997, "percent_yes": 67.66029808942683, "percent_no": 32.33970191057317, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the spending limit for County Service Area R-7 (Alamo ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the spending limit for County Service Area R-7 (Alamo Parks and Recreation) to $1,750,000 with adjustments for cost-of-living and population changes. The increase applies to fiscal years 2019/2020 through 2023/2024 to allow the service area to spend available funds during that period.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.767721", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.343729", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area R-7 (Alamo Parks and Recreation) be increased to $1,750,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the Fiscal Years 2019/2020 through 2023/2024 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2843, "fingerprint": "2020|202000012|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000012|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5f7775b6c32e087d", "measure_id": "202000012", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To keep Contra Costa\u2019s regional hospital open and staffed; fund community health centers; provide timely fire and emergency response; support crucial safety-net services; invest in early childhood services; protect vulnerable populations; and for other essential county services, shall the Contra Costa County measure levying a \u00bd cent sales tax, exempting food sales, providing an estimated $81,000,000 annually for 20 years that the State cannot take, with funds benefitting County residents, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 323322, "no_votes": 229793, "total_votes": 553115, "percent_yes": 58.45475172432496, "percent_no": 41.54524827567504, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.5% sales tax in Contra Costa County for 20 years, exempting food purchases, to generate approximately $81 million annually for county services including healthcare, fire/emergency response, and social services. The funds are designated to remain at the county level and cannot be redirected by the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.767995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.343918", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep Contra Costa\u2019s regional hospital open and staffed; fund community health centers; provide timely fire and emergency response; support crucial safety-net services; invest in early childhood services; protect vulnerable populations; and for other essential county services, shall the Contra Costa County measure levying a \u00bd cent sales tax, exempting food sales, providing an estimated $81,000,000 annually for 20 years that the State cannot take, with funds benefitting County residents, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2844, "fingerprint": "2020|202000125|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000125|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "405ac62036e47435", "measure_id": "202000125", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Town Council Ordinance No. 2019-06, rezoning a 410 acre parcel from agricultural preserve, general agricultural, and planned development district to a new planned development district and approving the Magee Preserve project, which creates 69 single family lots of approximately 29 acres of the 410 acre site, preserves the remaining 381 acres as permanent open space and dedicates easements for hiking and biking trails for public use on the site, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10241, "no_votes": 8639, "total_votes": 18880, "percent_yes": 54.24258474576271, "percent_no": 45.75741525423729, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure approved rezoning a 410-acre parcel to allow the Magee Preserve ...", "summary_text": "This measure approved rezoning a 410-acre parcel to allow the Magee Preserve project, which would create 69 single-family residential lots on 29 acres while preserving the remaining 381 acres as permanent open space with public hiking and biking trails.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.768262", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.344107", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Town Council Ordinance No. 2019-06, rezoning a 410 acre parcel from agricultural preserve, general agricultural, and planned development district to a new planned development district and approving the Magee Preserve project, which creates 69 single family lots of approximately 29 acres of the 410 acre site, preserves the remaining 381 acres as permanent open space and dedicates easements for hiking and biking trails for public use on the site, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2841, "fingerprint": "2020|202000011|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000011|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7a620cc44c7e3500", "measure_id": "202000011", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall County of Contra Costa Ordinance No. 2019-40 be approved to increase the existing annual parcel tax on County Service Area P-2 Zone A to $395 per parcel for residential property (single and multiple), $2,370 per parcel for commercial/industrial/institutional property, and $11,852 per parcel for commercial/theater property in the first year, with 3 percent increases every year thereafter, to provide additional funding for police protection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1690, "no_votes": 608, "total_votes": 2298, "percent_yes": 73.54221061792863, "percent_no": 26.45778938207137, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the annual parcel tax in Contra Costa County Service A...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the annual parcel tax in Contra Costa County Service Area P-2 Zone A to $395 for residential properties, $2,370 for commercial/industrial/institutional properties, and $11,852 for commercial/theater properties, with 3% annual increases thereafter. The revenue is designated to fund additional police protection services.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-05-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.767449", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.343526", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall County of Contra Costa Ordinance No. 2019-40 be approved to increase the existing annual parcel tax on County Service Area P-2 Zone A to $395 per parcel for residential property (single and multiple), $2,370 per parcel for commercial/industrial/institutional property, and $11,852 per parcel for commercial/theater property in the first year, with 3 percent increases every year thereafter, to provide additional funding for police protection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2853, "fingerprint": "2020|202000014|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000014|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "8a1c756205232362", "measure_id": "202000014", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To support vital local services including: providing support for law enforcement for emergency response; repairing potholes and maintaining streets; preparing for and responding to natural disasters and health emergencies; maintaining emergency dispatch services for fire, ambulance, and law enforcement; maintaining jail and criminal justice services; addressing blight and public nuisances; and other general services and infrastructure; shall the measure be adopted imposing a one percent sales tax in the unincorporated area of the county, until ended by voters, providing approximately $1.2 million dollars annually, with citizen oversight and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3953, "no_votes": 3892, "total_votes": 7845, "percent_yes": 50.38878266411727, "percent_no": 49.61121733588273, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a 1% sales tax in Del Norte County's unincorporated area...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a 1% sales tax in Del Norte County's unincorporated areas to fund local services including law enforcement, street maintenance, emergency response, disaster preparedness, and criminal justice services. The tax generates approximately $1.2 million annually and remains in effect until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.771637", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.346153", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support vital local services including: providing support for law enforcement for emergency response; repairing potholes and maintaining streets; preparing for and responding to natural disasters and health emergencies; maintaining emergency dispatch services for fire, ambulance, and law enforcement; maintaining jail and criminal justice services; addressing blight and public nuisances; and other general services and infrastructure; shall the measure be adopted imposing a one percent sales tax in the unincorporated area of the county, until ended by voters, providing approximately $1.2 million dollars annually, with citizen oversight and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2854, "fingerprint": "2020|202000132|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000132|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "42eb8af129f01e1d", "measure_id": "202000132", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support and maintain local emergency rescue services, including volunteer fire, medical aid and police response; improve staffing, training, and equipment for fire and police departments; repair potholes and maintain streets/sidewalks; support community health/wellness by funding city pool operations; and other general city services; shall the City of Crescent City's measure establishing a one-cent sales tax be adopted, providing $1,300,000 annually for essential city services until ended by voters, with citizen oversights, audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 722, "no_votes": 369, "total_votes": 1091, "percent_yes": 66.17781851512375, "percent_no": 33.82218148487625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established a one-cent sales tax in Crescent City to fund emergen...", "summary_text": "The measure established a one-cent sales tax in Crescent City to fund emergency services, fire and police department improvements, street maintenance, city pool operations, and other general city services, generating approximately $1,300,000 annually. The tax includes provisions for citizen oversight and audits, with all funds remaining under local control until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.771938", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.346337", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support and maintain local emergency rescue services, including volunteer fire, medical aid and police response; improve staffing, training, and equipment for fire and police departments; repair potholes and maintain streets/sidewalks; support community health/wellness by funding city pool operations; and other general city services; shall the City of Crescent City's measure establishing a one-cent sales tax be adopted, providing $1,300,000 annually for essential city services until ended by voters, with citizen oversights, audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2864, "fingerprint": "2020|202000482|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000482|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "224c677c6b4b00b9", "measure_id": "202000482", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and campus security systems; repair aging roofs/plumbing/electrical systems; and upgrade/acquire/construct classrooms, science labs and career training facilities that support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, arts and skilled trades, shall the El Dorado Union High School District measure authorizing $120,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, be adopted, levying approximately $16 per $100,000 assessed valuation ($8,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual independent audits and all money spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22621, "no_votes": 35930, "total_votes": 58551, "percent_yes": 38.6346945398029, "percent_no": 61.3653054601971, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the El Dorado Union High School District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the El Dorado Union High School District to issue $120 million in bonds to fund campus security improvements, facility repairs, and construction or upgrades of classrooms and specialized facilities for career and college preparation. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes of approximately $16 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.774884", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.348211", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and campus security systems; repair aging roofs/plumbing/electrical systems; and upgrade/acquire/construct classrooms, science labs and career training facilities that support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, arts and skilled trades, shall the El Dorado Union High School District measure authorizing $120,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, be adopted, levying approximately $16 per $100,000 assessed valuation ($8,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual independent audits and all money spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2865, "fingerprint": "2020|202000483|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000483|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "cf1a302c69560162", "measure_id": "202000483", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing future tax rates, shall the measure to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom Lake and Sacramento City campuses for job training, nursing/ healthcare, engineering/ science and fire/ police programs, by Los Rios Community College District to authorize $650 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $52 million per year until repaid, an average tax levy less than $0.02 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and taxpayer oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20592, "no_votes": 40784, "total_votes": 61376, "percent_yes": 33.55057351407716, "percent_no": 66.44942648592284, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Los Rios Community College District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Los Rios Community College District to issue $650 million in bonds to repair classrooms, facilities, and labs at five campuses for various job training and professional programs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an average rate of less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $52 million annually until repaid.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.775155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.348398", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing future tax rates, shall the measure to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom Lake and Sacramento City campuses for job training, nursing/ healthcare, engineering/ science and fire/ police programs, by Los Rios Community College District to authorize $650 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $52 million per year until repaid, an average tax levy less than $0.02 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and taxpayer oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2866, "fingerprint": "2020|202000484|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000484|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "f35e1d26cf5b37c6", "measure_id": "202000484", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Rescue Union Schools; repair or replace leaky roofs; construct and modernize facilities; update inadequate electrical systems; and make health and safety improvements; shall Rescue Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $75,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $3.9 million annually for issued bonds through maturity at a rate of approximately three cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5702, "no_votes": 8636, "total_votes": 14338, "percent_yes": 39.768447482215095, "percent_no": 60.231552517784905, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Rescue Union School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Rescue Union School District to issue $75 million in bonds to fund facility repairs, modernization, and health and safety improvements, funded through property taxes of approximately three cents per $100 of assessed value. The bonds would have generated approximately $3.9 million annually through maturity, with citizens' oversight and annual audits required.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.775429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.348588", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Rescue Union Schools; repair or replace leaky roofs; construct and modernize facilities; update inadequate electrical systems; and make health and safety improvements; shall Rescue Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $75,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $3.9 million annually for issued bonds through maturity at a rate of approximately three cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2863, "fingerprint": "2020|202000481|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000481|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ac92cd26b6760898", "measure_id": "202000481", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education facilities; upgrade classrooms, restrooms and schools; repair/replace roofs; and renovate electrical/plumbing/sewer systems; shall Black Oak Mine Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing the issuance of $29,868,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $1,653,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with audits, independent citizen\u2019 oversight committee, no money for salaries, and all money on local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2456, "no_votes": 3278, "total_votes": 5734, "percent_yes": 42.83222881060342, "percent_no": 57.16777118939658, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Black Oak Mine Unified School District...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Black Oak Mine Unified School District to issue $29,868,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and restroom upgrades, roof repairs and replacements, and renovations to electrical, plumbing, and sewer systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.774550", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.348017", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education facilities; upgrade classrooms, restrooms and schools; repair/replace roofs; and renovate electrical/plumbing/sewer systems; shall Black Oak Mine Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing the issuance of $29,868,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $1,653,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with audits, independent citizen\u2019 oversight committee, no money for salaries, and all money on local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2858, "fingerprint": "2020|202000018|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000018|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "5e4130862e1e65f4", "measure_id": "202000018", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure providing for an annual special tax of $270.00 on each improved parcel of land and $120.00 on each unimproved parcel of land for an unlimited duration be levied within the Gilmore Vista Road Zone of Benefit, to replace the existing benefit assessments of $170.00 and $70.00, respectively, to be used only for snow removal, road improvements, and maintenance services and generating annual revenue of $11,550.00, commencing fiscal year 2020/2021, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34, "no_votes": 13, "total_votes": 47, "percent_yes": 72.3404255319149, "percent_no": 27.659574468085097, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a permanent annual special tax within the Gilmore Vi...", "summary_text": "This measure established a permanent annual special tax within the Gilmore Vista Road Zone of Benefit in El Dorado County, charging $270 for improved parcels and $120 for unimproved parcels to fund snow removal, road improvements, and maintenance services. The tax replaced existing lower assessments of $170 and $70 respectively, generating approximately $11,550 in annual revenue.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.773144", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.347080", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure providing for an annual special tax of $270.00 on each improved parcel of land and $120.00 on each unimproved parcel of land for an unlimited duration be levied within the Gilmore Vista Road Zone of Benefit, to replace the existing benefit assessments of $170.00 and $70.00, respectively, to be used only for snow removal, road improvements, and maintenance services and generating annual revenue of $11,550.00, commencing fiscal year 2020/2021, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2857, "fingerprint": "2020|202000017|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000017|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ff66b2bb6e15fb37", "measure_id": "202000017", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure providing for an annual special tax of $450.00 on each parcel of land for an unlimited duration be levied within the Fernwood Cothrin Ranch Road Zone of Benefit, to replace the existing special tax of $150.00, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance services and generating annual revenue of $118,800.00, commencing fiscal year 2020/2021, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 207, "no_votes": 142, "total_votes": 349, "percent_yes": 59.31232091690545, "percent_no": 40.68767908309455, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have replaced an existing $150 annual special tax on parce...", "summary_text": "This measure would have replaced an existing $150 annual special tax on parcels within the Fernwood Cothrin Ranch Road Zone of Benefit with a $450 annual tax for unlimited duration to fund road improvements and maintenance. The increased tax was expected to generate $118,800 annually starting in fiscal year 2020-2021.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.772878", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.346899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure providing for an annual special tax of $450.00 on each parcel of land for an unlimited duration be levied within the Fernwood Cothrin Ranch Road Zone of Benefit, to replace the existing special tax of $150.00, to be used only for road improvements and maintenance services and generating annual revenue of $118,800.00, commencing fiscal year 2020/2021, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2856, "fingerprint": "2020|202000016|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000016|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "94bd9e19283bcb8c", "measure_id": "202000016", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure providing for an annual special tax of $500.00 on each parcel of real property for an unlimited duration be levied within the Lynx Trail Road Zone of Benefit, which would be an increase to the current special tax of $300.00 per year, to be used only for road improvements, and maintenance services and generating annual revenue of $37,500.00, commencing fiscal year 2020/2021, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31, "no_votes": 35, "total_votes": 66, "percent_yes": 46.96969696969697, "percent_no": 53.03030303030303, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased the annual special tax on each parcel of rea...", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased the annual special tax on each parcel of real property in the Lynx Trail Road Zone of Benefit from $300 to $500 per year for an unlimited duration to fund road improvements and maintenance services. The tax increase would have generated approximately $37,500 annually starting in fiscal year 2020-2021.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.772583", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.346714", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure providing for an annual special tax of $500.00 on each parcel of real property for an unlimited duration be levied within the Lynx Trail Road Zone of Benefit, which would be an increase to the current special tax of $300.00 per year, to be used only for road improvements, and maintenance services and generating annual revenue of $37,500.00, commencing fiscal year 2020/2021, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2855, "fingerprint": "2020|202000015|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000015|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "1ebc3d384106abb0", "measure_id": "202000015", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure providing for an annual special tax of $80.00 for twenty years\u2019 duration on improved parcels of land within the South Shore Snow removal Zone of benefit, and replacing the current benefit assessment of $20.00 per parcel, to be used exclusively for acquisition of snow removal equipment to improve public safety, not salaries and benefits, and subject to annual oversight, which will generate annual revenue of $536,720.00 commencing fiscal year 2020/2021, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1727, "no_votes": 1788, "total_votes": 3515, "percent_yes": 49.13229018492176, "percent_no": 50.86770981507824, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an annual $80 special tax on improved parcels...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an annual $80 special tax on improved parcels in the South Shore Snow Removal Zone for 20 years, replacing the current $20 assessment, to fund snow removal equipment purchases. The tax was projected to generate $536,720 annually starting in fiscal year 2020/2021.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.772280", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.346523", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure providing for an annual special tax of $80.00 for twenty years\u2019 duration on improved parcels of land within the South Shore Snow removal Zone of benefit, and replacing the current benefit assessment of $20.00 per parcel, to be used exclusively for acquisition of snow removal equipment to improve public safety, not salaries and benefits, and subject to annual oversight, which will generate annual revenue of $536,720.00 commencing fiscal year 2020/2021, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2859, "fingerprint": "2020|202000019|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000019|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "c56de9453728c918", "measure_id": "202000019", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an amendment to the bylaws of the Hickok Road Community Services District to increase the maximum annual Special Tax by $200 per parcel per year, such that the total Special Tax could increase from $200 to $400 per parcel per year, be adopted? The maximum resulting gain could increase from $12,400 to $24,800 per year. The increase would be in effect until amended or the board deems additional funds are no longer required to maintain, upgrade, or improve District roads.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46, "no_votes": 41, "total_votes": 87, "percent_yes": 52.87356321839081, "percent_no": 47.12643678160919, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the Hickok Road Community Services District b...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the Hickok Road Community Services District bylaws to increase the maximum annual special tax from $200 to $400 per parcel per year to fund road maintenance, upgrades, and improvements. The tax increase would remain in effect until the board determined additional funds were no longer needed or the bylaws were amended again.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.773407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.347265", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an amendment to the bylaws of the Hickok Road Community Services District to increase the maximum annual Special Tax by $200 per parcel per year, such that the total Special Tax could increase from $200 to $400 per parcel per year, be adopted? The maximum resulting gain could increase from $12,400 to $24,800 per year. The increase would be in effect until amended or the board deems additional funds are no longer required to maintain, upgrade, or improve District roads.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2860, "fingerprint": "2020|202000020|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000020|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "f802eed9363089a7", "measure_id": "202000020", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure providing for an annual special tax of $600.00 on each parcel of real property for an unlimited duration be levied within the\u00a0Mortara Circle Community Services District, which would be an increase to the current\u00a0special tax of $350.00 per year, to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services and generating an annual revenue of $18,600.00, commencing fiscal year 2021/2022, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14, "no_votes": 46, "total_votes": 60, "percent_yes": 23.33333333333333, "percent_no": 76.66666666666667, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased the annual special tax on each property parc...", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased the annual special tax on each property parcel in the Mortara Circle Community Services District from $350 to $600 per year for road improvement and maintenance services. The tax increase would have generated approximately $18,600 annually starting in fiscal year 2021/2022 and would have continued indefinitely.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.773679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.347452", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure providing for an annual special tax of $600.00 on each parcel of real property for an unlimited duration be levied within the\u00a0Mortara Circle Community Services District, which would be an increase to the current\u00a0special tax of $350.00 per year, to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services and generating an annual revenue of $18,600.00, commencing fiscal year 2021/2022, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2861, "fingerprint": "2020|202000133|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000133|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "420c6da9ff780e8f", "measure_id": "202000133", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed with the first appointment to be made upon the (i) expiration of the term of office of the person elected to serve as City Treasurer at the November 3, 2020 General Municipal Election; or (ii) the office becoming vacant, whichever occurs first?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2860, "no_votes": 1757, "total_votes": 4617, "percent_yes": 61.94498592159411, "percent_no": 38.05501407840589, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changes the El Dorado City Treasurer position from elected to ap...", "summary_text": "This measure changes the El Dorado City Treasurer position from elected to appointed, with the change taking effect when the current elected treasurer's term expires or the office becomes vacant, whichever happens first.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.773946", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.347643", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed with the first appointment to be made upon the (i) expiration of the term of office of the person elected to serve as City Treasurer at the November 3, 2020 General Municipal Election; or (ii) the office becoming vacant, whichever occurs first?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2862, "fingerprint": "2020|202000134|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000134|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "552ea5bc8b5f4a9e", "measure_id": "202000134", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to maintain fire protection, 9-1-1 emergency response, public safety, snow removal; reduce wildfire threats; prevent Lake pollution; repair streets/ potholes, keep public areas safe/ clean; retain local jobs/ businesses; protect long- term financial stability; provide other City services by establishing a 1\u00a2 transactions/ use (\u201c sales\u201d) tax providing approximately $5,400,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, all funds only for South Lake Tahoe, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5804, "no_votes": 3303, "total_votes": 9107, "percent_yes": 63.73119578346327, "percent_no": 36.26880421653673, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in South Lake Tahoe to fund fire ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 1-cent sales tax in South Lake Tahoe to fund fire protection, emergency response, public safety, snow removal, wildfire reduction, environmental protection, street repairs, and other city services, generating approximately $5.4 million annually. The tax remains in effect until voters choose to end it and requires regular audits with all funds designated exclusively for South Lake Tahoe use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.774263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.347825", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to maintain fire protection, 9-1-1 emergency response, public safety, snow removal; reduce wildfire threats; prevent Lake pollution; repair streets/ potholes, keep public areas safe/ clean; retain local jobs/ businesses; protect long- term financial stability; provide other City services by establishing a 1\u00a2 transactions/ use (\u201c sales\u201d) tax providing approximately $5,400,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, all funds only for South Lake Tahoe, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11090, "fingerprint": "2020|202000494|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000494|FRESNO", "content_hash": "4196c746a2b49716", "measure_id": "202000494", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "With no estimated increase to current tax rates, all money staying local, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, shall Clovis Unified School District\u2019s measure to maintain neighborhood schools, upgrade security/health measures and avoid overcrowding by: building, modernizing, and repairing school and career/vocational facilities be adopted, authorizing $335 million in bonds at legal interest rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, raising $27.3 million annually to repay bonds through maturity, with required independent audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64644, "no_votes": 42610, "total_votes": 107254, "percent_yes": 60.271877971917135, "percent_no": 39.728122028082865, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Clovis Unified School District to issue $335 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Clovis Unified School District to issue $335 million in bonds to build, modernize, and repair school and career/vocational facilities, with funding raised through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value. The bonds would generate approximately $27.3 million annually to repay the debt through maturity, with independent audits and citizen oversight required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.369408", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.780241", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.351748", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "With no estimated increase to current tax rates, all money staying local, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, shall Clovis Unified School District\u2019s measure to maintain neighborhood schools, upgrade security/health measures and avoid overcrowding by: building, modernizing, and repairing school and career/vocational facilities be adopted, authorizing $335 million in bonds at legal interest rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, raising $27.3 million annually to repay bonds through maturity, with required independent audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2873, "fingerprint": "2020|202000486|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000486|FRESNO", "content_hash": "cdc4c9b4585f2614", "measure_id": "202000486", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve and repair neighborhood schools including classrooms, labs, vocational/career education; remove hazardous materials where needed; repair aging roofs; improve school safety/security; construct/expand schools reducing overcrowding, shall Clovis Unified School Districts measure authorizing $408 million in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, levying approximately per $100 assessed valuation (raising $30 million annually for bonds while outstanding), requiring audits, citizens oversight, all funds for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31870, "no_votes": 32424, "total_votes": 64294, "percent_yes": 49.56916664074408, "percent_no": 50.43083335925592, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Clovis Unified School District to issue $4...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Clovis Unified School District to issue $408 million in bonds to improve and repair schools, including classroom upgrades, hazardous material removal, roof repairs, safety improvements, and construction to reduce overcrowding. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $30 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.778267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.350443", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve and repair neighborhood schools including classrooms, labs, vocational/career education; remove hazardous materials where needed; repair aging roofs; improve school safety/security; construct/expand schools reducing overcrowding, shall Clovis Unified School Districts measure authorizing $408 million in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, levying approximately per $100 assessed valuation (raising $30 million annually for bonds while outstanding), requiring audits, citizens oversight, all funds for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11086, "fingerprint": "2020|202000136|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000136|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b138207db66a780c", "measure_id": "202000136", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain 911 emergency response times, police protection, patrols, anti-gang and drug programs, repair streets, alleys, potholes, and other infrastructure; maintain parks, youth, after school, and senior programs; retain and attract Iocal businesses; address homelessness; and provide other services; shall the City of Reedley enact a $0.75 cent sales tax providing approximately annually, annual audits and 10 year review, with all funds benefiting Reedley residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2464, "no_votes": 1513, "total_votes": 3977, "percent_yes": 61.95624842846367, "percent_no": 38.04375157153633, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.75 cent sales tax in Reedley, California to fund emergency services, police protection, street repairs, parks, youth and senior programs, business retention, and homelessness services. The tax includes provisions for annual audits and a 10-year review period.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.367507", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.777655", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.350070", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain 911 emergency response times, police protection, patrols, anti-gang and drug programs, repair streets, alleys, potholes, and other infrastructure; maintain parks, youth, after school, and senior programs; retain and attract Iocal businesses; address homelessness; and provide other services; shall the City of Reedley enact a $0.75 cent sales tax providing approximately annually, annual audits and 10 year review, with all funds benefiting Reedley residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2868, "fingerprint": "2020|202000138|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000138|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "202000138", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1981, "no_votes": 1863, "total_votes": 3844, "percent_yes": 51.534859521331946, "percent_no": 48.465140478668054, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.776325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.349149", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11092, "fingerprint": "2020|202000496|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000496|FRESNO", "content_hash": "536fd2ae23a41cfc", "measure_id": "202000496", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve college/career preparation, reduce overcrowding by completing the Sanger Unified School District Educational Complex/ upgrade all schools including vocational/career/classrooms/labs, online learning technology, emergency communication systems, security door locks, preparation for public health emergencies, shall Sanger Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $150,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising $7,600,000 annually to repay issued bonds through maturity, requiring audits, oversight, all money used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12595, "no_votes": 9136, "total_votes": 21731, "percent_yes": 57.95867654502784, "percent_no": 42.04132345497216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Sanger Unified School District to issue $150 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Sanger Unified School District to issue $150 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including completing an educational complex, upgrading classrooms and technology, and enhancing security and emergency preparedness systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $7.6 million annually until maturity.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.369814", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.780830", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.352124", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve college/career preparation, reduce overcrowding by completing the Sanger Unified School District Educational Complex/ upgrade all schools including vocational/career/classrooms/labs, online learning technology, emergency communication systems, security door locks, preparation for public health emergencies, shall Sanger Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $150,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising $7,600,000 annually to repay issued bonds through maturity, requiring audits, oversight, all money used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2872, "fingerprint": "2020|202000485|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000485|FRESNO", "content_hash": "27654ef81299601b", "measure_id": "202000485", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a new elementary school, complete the new high school, renovate, construct, repair and equip classrooms and school facilities, upgrade electrical, water and technology infrastructure, and improve school safety and security, shall the Central Unified School District measure authorizing $120,000,000 in bonds be adopted, with rates within legal limits, an estimated levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value (averaging $6.8 million annually) through 2054, annual audits, citizen's oversight and all money spent on local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8155, "no_votes": 6706, "total_votes": 14861, "percent_yes": 54.87517663683467, "percent_no": 45.12482336316533, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Central Unified School District to issu...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Central Unified School District to issue $120 million in bonds to build a new elementary school, complete a new high school, renovate existing facilities, upgrade infrastructure, and improve safety and security. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value through 2054.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.777995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.350255", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a new elementary school, complete the new high school, renovate, construct, repair and equip classrooms and school facilities, upgrade electrical, water and technology infrastructure, and improve school safety and security, shall the Central Unified School District measure authorizing $120,000,000 in bonds be adopted, with rates within legal limits, an estimated levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value (averaging $6.8 million annually) through 2054, annual audits, citizen's oversight and all money spent on local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11089, "fingerprint": "2020|202000493|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000493|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f4cb7e349bf440dc", "measure_id": "202000493", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide quality schools including a comprehensive high school and new elementary school; improve student safety/school security; renovate existing classrooms and schools; upgrade technology infrastructure, and create local construction jobs shall Central Unified School District's measure authorizing $120 million in bonds be adopted, with legal interest rates, estimated levies averaging less than 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising $6.8 million annually to repay bonds through maturity, annual audits, citizen oversight and all funds benefitting Central schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17484, "no_votes": 11599, "total_votes": 29083, "percent_yes": 60.117594470996806, "percent_no": 39.882405529003194, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Central Unified School District to issue $120 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Central Unified School District to issue $120 million in bonds to build a comprehensive high school and elementary school, renovate existing facilities, upgrade technology infrastructure, and improve school safety and security. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies estimated at less than 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $6.8 million annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.369221", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.779962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.351566", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide quality schools including a comprehensive high school and new elementary school; improve student safety/school security; renovate existing classrooms and schools; upgrade technology infrastructure, and create local construction jobs shall Central Unified School District's measure authorizing $120 million in bonds be adopted, with legal interest rates, estimated levies averaging less than 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising $6.8 million annually to repay bonds through maturity, annual audits, citizen oversight and all funds benefitting Central schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2876, "fingerprint": "2020|202000491|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000491|FRESNO", "content_hash": "70ac035e13d13275", "measure_id": "202000491", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; construct new facilities to reduce student overcrowding; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall Parlier Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $11,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $613,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 801, "no_votes": 473, "total_votes": 1274, "percent_yes": 62.87284144427001, "percent_no": 37.12715855572999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Parlier Unified School District to issue $11 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Parlier Unified School District to issue $11 million in bonds to modernize classrooms and facilities, construct new buildings to address overcrowding, and make infrastructure repairs. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.779423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.351193", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; construct new facilities to reduce student overcrowding; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall Parlier Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $11,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $613,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11087, "fingerprint": "2020|202000489|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000489|FRESNO", "content_hash": "36daf2a64f78db05", "measure_id": "202000489", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of high school facilities without increasing the estimated tax rate; repair/replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $17,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2061, "no_votes": 1769, "total_votes": 3830, "percent_yes": 53.81201044386423, "percent_no": 46.18798955613577, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Kingsburg Joint Union High School Distr...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District to issue $17 million in bonds to repair roofs, upgrade technology access, and modernize classrooms and facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $1 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.368447", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.778877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.350819", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of high school facilities without increasing the estimated tax rate; repair/replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $17,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2870, "fingerprint": "2020|202000141|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000141|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f13014ee3f07dccd", "measure_id": "202000141", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2019-8, providing for the legislative body of the City of Selma to be elected by districts in four districts with an elective mayor to be elected by the voters of the entire City be repealed and replaced by an ordinance requiring the members of the legislative body of the City of Selma be elected by five districts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2907, "no_votes": 4196, "total_votes": 7103, "percent_yes": 40.92636913980008, "percent_no": 59.07363086019992, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed Selma's city council election system from fou...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed Selma's city council election system from four districts plus a citywide-elected mayor to five districts with no separately elected mayor.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.776857", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.349517", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2019-8, providing for the legislative body of the City of Selma to be elected by districts in four districts with an elective mayor to be elected by the voters of the entire City be repealed and replaced by an ordinance requiring the members of the legislative body of the City of Selma be elected by five districts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11084, "fingerprint": "2020|202000139|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000139|FRESNO", "content_hash": "fc4065ecde0c9588", "measure_id": "202000139", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Sunset Clause or expiration date set by Section 3.25.070 of the Parlier Municipal Code which will end the Special Parcel Tax to pay only for local police protection services be repealed so that the Parcel Tax adopted by the voters and enacted as Chapter 3.25 of Title 3 of the Parlier Municipal Code is extended to enable the City to continue to fund basic and necessary public safety services to residents and inhabitants of the City of Parlier?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1866, "no_votes": 954, "total_votes": 2820, "percent_yes": 66.17021276595744, "percent_no": 33.829787234042556, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have repealed the expiration date of Parlier's special parc...", "summary_text": "The measure would have repealed the expiration date of Parlier's special parcel tax for police protection services, allowing the city to continue collecting the tax indefinitely to fund public safety services. The measure failed despite receiving 66.2% support because it required a two-thirds majority to pass.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.366050", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.776051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.348967", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sunset Clause or expiration date set by Section 3.25.070 of the Parlier Municipal Code which will end the Special Parcel Tax to pay only for local police protection services be repealed so that the Parcel Tax adopted by the voters and enacted as Chapter 3.25 of Title 3 of the Parlier Municipal Code is extended to enable the City to continue to fund basic and necessary public safety services to residents and inhabitants of the City of Parlier?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2867, "fingerprint": "2020|202000135|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000135|FRESNO", "content_hash": "c530942cad25bdaf", "measure_id": "202000135", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Improve public safety and emergency response times; maintain the number of police officers; fight crime/gangs/drugs; provide modern firefighting equipment, with all money used only for local Police and Fire, shall Orange Cove establish an annual special $36 parcel tax for single-family homes and specified amounts for multifamily, commercial, agricultural, industrial parcels, expected to raise about $98,000 annually for four years, with independent Citizen Oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 430, "no_votes": 291, "total_votes": 721, "percent_yes": 59.63938973647711, "percent_no": 40.36061026352289, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a four-year special parcel tax of $36 annu...", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a four-year special parcel tax of $36 annually for single-family homes (with specified amounts for other property types) to fund local police and fire services in Orange Cove, expected to raise approximately $98,000 per year. The measure required a two-thirds majority to pass but received only 59.6% approval and therefore failed.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.775698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.348780", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Improve public safety and emergency response times; maintain the number of police officers; fight crime/gangs/drugs; provide modern firefighting equipment, with all money used only for local Police and Fire, shall Orange Cove establish an annual special $36 parcel tax for single-family homes and specified amounts for multifamily, commercial, agricultural, industrial parcels, expected to raise about $98,000 annually for four years, with independent Citizen Oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11088, "fingerprint": "2020|202000492|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000492|FRESNO", "content_hash": "9fa9dad31b3abe21", "measure_id": "202000492", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air- conditioning systems; modernize/renovate or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall Washington Unified School District issue $46,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,600,000 annually while the bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1420, "no_votes": 1226, "total_votes": 2646, "percent_yes": 53.66591080876795, "percent_no": 46.33408919123205, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Washington Unified School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Washington Unified School District to issue $46 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including HVAC systems, classrooms, restrooms, and roofs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.369034", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.779690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.351380", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air- conditioning systems; modernize/renovate or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall Washington Unified School District issue $46,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,600,000 annually while the bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2869, "fingerprint": "2020|202000140|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000140|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a828f057e7304dc2", "measure_id": "202000140", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure that changes the term of office for the mayor from a two-year term to a four-year term effective with the election of Mayor at November 3, 2020 election be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3023, "no_votes": 5654, "total_votes": 8677, "percent_yes": 34.83923014866889, "percent_no": 65.16076985133111, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have extended the mayor's term of office in Fresno from tw...", "summary_text": "This measure would have extended the mayor's term of office in Fresno from two years to four years, beginning with the mayor elected in November 2020.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.776593", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.349334", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure that changes the term of office for the mayor from a two-year term to a four-year term effective with the election of Mayor at November 3, 2020 election be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11091, "fingerprint": "2020|202000495|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000495|FRESNO", "content_hash": "e2d7036c1205302f", "measure_id": "202000495", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To expand vocational education facilities and construct permanent classrooms to replace portables; renovate classrooms, athletic facilities and schools; and replace aging roofs and outdated fire alarm and heating/air conditioning systems, shall Riverdale Joint Unified School District's measure authorizing $25,900,000 in bonds with legal rates, estimated levies through 2052 of less than 6 cents per $100 assessed value (averaging $1 ,411,000 annually), annual audits, citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries/pensions and all money benefitting local schools be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1142, "no_votes": 592, "total_votes": 1734, "percent_yes": 65.85928489042676, "percent_no": 34.140715109573236, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Riverdale Joint Unified School District to issue $25", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Riverdale Joint Unified School District to issue $25.9 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including expanding vocational education facilities, constructing permanent classrooms to replace portables, renovating classrooms and athletic facilities, and updating infrastructure systems. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies estimated at less than 6 cents per $100 of assessed value through 2052.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.369615", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.780524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.351941", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand vocational education facilities and construct permanent classrooms to replace portables; renovate classrooms, athletic facilities and schools; and replace aging roofs and outdated fire alarm and heating/air conditioning systems, shall Riverdale Joint Unified School District's measure authorizing $25,900,000 in bonds with legal rates, estimated levies through 2052 of less than 6 cents per $100 assessed value (averaging $1 ,411,000 annually), annual audits, citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries/pensions and all money benefitting local schools be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2875, "fingerprint": "2020|202000490|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000490|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d126684ac85ffc85", "measure_id": "202000490", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade job training/instructional classrooms, science/computer labs; improve student safety, emergency communication/security systems, shall Merced Community College District's measure authorizing $247,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25 /$100,000 assessed valuation ($14,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, requiring audits/citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, all funds used locally to improve opportunities for veterans, remove asbestos/lead paint and acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27, "no_votes": 93, "total_votes": 120, "percent_yes": 22.5, "percent_no": 77.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Merced Community College District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Merced Community College District to issue $247 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms and labs, improve safety systems, remove hazardous materials, and construct or repair facilities and equipment. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.779156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.351011", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade job training/instructional classrooms, science/computer labs; improve student safety, emergency communication/security systems, shall Merced Community College District's measure authorizing $247,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25 /$100,000 assessed valuation ($14,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, requiring audits/citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, all funds used locally to improve opportunities for veterans, remove asbestos/lead paint and acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11093, "fingerprint": "2020|202000487|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000487|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f068237e9fbbf3d3", "measure_id": "202000487", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To fund the operational needs of the Cutler-Orosi Sports Complex(es) and develop Recreation programs within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, arts, music and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens shall levy a tax of $38.00 per parcel annually with annual cost of living adjustment, initially raising approximately $196,308 annually as long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28, "no_votes": 116, "total_votes": 144, "percent_yes": 19.44444444444444, "percent_no": 80.55555555555556, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an annual $38 per parcel tax with cost-of-liv...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an annual $38 per parcel tax with cost-of-living adjustments to fund operations of the Cutler-Orosi Sports Complex and recreation programs for youth activities including sports, arts, and music. The tax was expected to raise approximately $196,308 annually under oversight of the Cutler-Orosi School Board.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.370191", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.781435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.352501", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund the operational needs of the Cutler-Orosi Sports Complex(es) and develop Recreation programs within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, arts, music and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens shall levy a tax of $38.00 per parcel annually with annual cost of living adjustment, initially raising approximately $196,308 annually as long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2877, "fingerprint": "2020|202000497|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000497|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b28e608d6618537a", "measure_id": "202000497", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize/renovate or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall Washington Unified School District issue $46,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,600,000 annually while the bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2825, "no_votes": 1921, "total_votes": 4746, "percent_yes": 59.523809523809526, "percent_no": 40.476190476190474, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Washington Unified School District to issue $46 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Washington Unified School District to issue $46 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including HVAC systems, classrooms, restrooms, and roofs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.781161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.352311", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize/renovate or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall Washington Unified School District issue $46,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,600,000 annually while the bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11085, "fingerprint": "2020|202000142|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000142|FRESNO", "content_hash": "7f3c740a57cdbe8e", "measure_id": "202000142", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall one licensed gambling establishment in which any controlled games permitted by law, such as draw poker, low- ball poker, panguine (pan), seven-card stud, or other lawful card games or tile games, are played, be allowed in the City of Selma?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2740, "no_votes": 4564, "total_votes": 7304, "percent_yes": 37.51369112814895, "percent_no": 62.48630887185105, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed one licensed gambling establishment offering ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed one licensed gambling establishment offering controlled games like poker, pan, and other lawful card and tile games to operate in the City of Selma.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.367269", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.777385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.349886", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall one licensed gambling establishment in which any controlled games permitted by law, such as draw poker, low- ball poker, panguine (pan), seven-card stud, or other lawful card games or tile games, are played, be allowed in the City of Selma?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2871, "fingerprint": "2020|202000137|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000137|FRESNO", "content_hash": "7f3c740a57cdbe8e", "measure_id": "202000137", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall one licensed gambling establishment in which any controlled games permitted by law, such as draw poker, low- ball poker, panguine (pan), seven-card stud, or other lawful card games or tile games, are played, be allowed in the City of Selma?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1082, "no_votes": 2176, "total_votes": 3258, "percent_yes": 33.21055862492326, "percent_no": 66.78944137507673, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have allowed one licensed gambling establishment offering c...", "summary_text": "The measure would have allowed one licensed gambling establishment offering controlled games such as draw poker, lowball poker, panguingue, seven-card stud, and other lawful card or tile games in the City of Selma.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.777120", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.349702", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall one licensed gambling establishment in which any controlled games permitted by law, such as draw poker, low- ball poker, panguine (pan), seven-card stud, or other lawful card games or tile games, are played, be allowed in the City of Selma?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2874, "fingerprint": "2020|202000488|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000488|FRESNO", "content_hash": "37fbdf0bff586373", "measure_id": "202000488", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide quality schools; increase safety/security; attract/retain teachers; improve career education, technology, science classrooms; remove lead/asbestos; upgrade heating/air conditioning; renovate, repair, construct, acquire, equip facilities; shall Fresno Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $325 million in bonds requiring audits/oversight, legal rates, all funds for local schools, projected levy of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, $24.1 million annually while bonds are outstanding, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38717, "no_votes": 26055, "total_votes": 64772, "percent_yes": 59.77428518495647, "percent_no": 40.22571481504353, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Fresno Unified School District to issue $325 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Fresno Unified School District to issue $325 million in bonds to renovate, repair, and construct school facilities, including improvements to safety, technology, and HVAC systems, and removal of hazardous materials. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a projected rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.778544", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.350626", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide quality schools; increase safety/security; attract/retain teachers; improve career education, technology, science classrooms; remove lead/asbestos; upgrade heating/air conditioning; renovate, repair, construct, acquire, equip facilities; shall Fresno Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $325 million in bonds requiring audits/oversight, legal rates, all funds for local schools, projected levy of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, $24.1 million annually while bonds are outstanding, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2879, "fingerprint": "2020|202000498|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000498|GLENN", "content_hash": "535ed9ad4495c650", "measure_id": "202000498", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22, "no_votes": 134, "total_votes": 156, "percent_yes": 14.1025641025641, "percent_no": 85.8974358974359, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to issue $228.4 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct classrooms and buildings for career and technical education programs across its campuses. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.782099", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.352872", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2878, "fingerprint": "2020|202000143|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000143|GLENN", "content_hash": "f660e962a509c251", "measure_id": "202000143", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to provide adequate fire and emergency medical services within the City of Willows by enacting a 3/4 cent sales, transaction and use tax, until the voters decides otherwise, generating an estimated $850,000 annually for City's fire and emergency medical services, with all funds staying in Willows, with citizen oversight and independent audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1297, "no_votes": 986, "total_votes": 2283, "percent_yes": 56.81121331581252, "percent_no": 43.18878668418748, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted a 0.75% sales tax in Willows to fund fire and emergency medical services, generating approximately $850,000 annually with citizen oversight and independent audits. The tax would have remained in effect until voters decided to repeal it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.781717", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.352686", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to provide adequate fire and emergency medical services within the City of Willows by enacting a 3/4 cent sales, transaction and use tax, until the voters decides otherwise, generating an estimated $850,000 annually for City's fire and emergency medical services, with all funds staying in Willows, with citizen oversight and independent audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2881, "fingerprint": "2020|202000144|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000144|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "3c3466338f9849ba", "measure_id": "202000144", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect and preserve natural open space areas for future generations by: improving and maintaining parks, open spaces and trails; protecting land around creeks, rivers and streams to prevent pollution and improve water quality; protecting redwood forests, wildlife habitat, working lands, scenic hillsides, and agricultural land; expanding public access and trail systems; shall the City of Arcata levy a special tax of $37 annually per parcel providing approximately $175,000 annually until ended by voters, with citizen oversight and all funds benefitting local open space, as set forth in City Council Resolution 190-68?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7664, "no_votes": 1838, "total_votes": 9502, "percent_yes": 80.65670385182067, "percent_no": 19.343296148179334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Arcata to levy a $37 annual special tax p...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Arcata to levy a $37 annual special tax per parcel to fund the protection and preservation of natural open spaces, parks, trails, and environmental areas. The tax generates approximately $175,000 annually and continues until ended by voters, with citizen oversight required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.782659", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.353234", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect and preserve natural open space areas for future generations by: improving and maintaining parks, open spaces and trails; protecting land around creeks, rivers and streams to prevent pollution and improve water quality; protecting redwood forests, wildlife habitat, working lands, scenic hillsides, and agricultural land; expanding public access and trail systems; shall the City of Arcata levy a special tax of $37 annually per parcel providing approximately $175,000 annually until ended by voters, with citizen oversight and all funds benefitting local open space, as set forth in City Council Resolution 190-68?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2883, "fingerprint": "2020|202000145|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000145|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "35368bf95ca45268", "measure_id": "202000145", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall private and public entities be authorized to develop, construct, or acquire up to 7.5% of the total number of housing units in the City of Arcata for elderly, disabled and alter-abled, and low-income households, pursuant to Article XXXIV of the California Constitution? An affirmative vote on this measure has no fiscal impact, nor does it grant approval for any specific project. If approved, this measure would rescind and replace the 1992 Measure L, which authorized a limit of 5%.\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7107, "no_votes": 2091, "total_votes": 9198, "percent_yes": 77.26679712981083, "percent_no": 22.733202870189174, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize private and public entities to develop, construc...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize private and public entities to develop, construct, or acquire up to 7.5% of Arcata's total housing units for elderly, disabled, and low-income households, increasing the limit from the previous 5% established in 1992. The measure itself has no fiscal impact and does not approve any specific housing projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.783241", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.353606", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall private and public entities be authorized to develop, construct, or acquire up to 7.5% of the total number of housing units in the City of Arcata for elderly, disabled and alter-abled, and low-income households, pursuant to Article XXXIV of the California Constitution? An affirmative vote on this measure has no fiscal impact, nor does it grant approval for any specific project. If approved, this measure would rescind and replace the 1992 Measure L, which authorized a limit of 5%.\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2882, "fingerprint": "2020|202000146|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000146|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "efd9978eacbacbf9", "measure_id": "202000146", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 202 and 207 of the Eureka City Charter be amended to require the Eureka City Council to adopt an ordinance providing for ranked choice voting for offices of Mayor and Councilmembers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7083, "no_votes": 4519, "total_votes": 11602, "percent_yes": 61.0498189967247, "percent_no": 38.9501810032753, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Eureka City Charter to require the City Council to a...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Eureka City Charter to require the City Council to adopt an ordinance implementing ranked choice voting for mayoral and city council elections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.782932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.353425", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 202 and 207 of the Eureka City Charter be amended to require the Eureka City Council to adopt an ordinance providing for ranked choice voting for offices of Mayor and Councilmembers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2891, "fingerprint": "2020|202000503|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000503|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "870b24c2d18ef384", "measure_id": "202000503", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve South Bay and Pine Hill Schools; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health and safety improvements; shall South Bay Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $5,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising on average $312,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, have independent citizens\u2019 oversight and NO money used for administrative salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1969, "no_votes": 1378, "total_votes": 3347, "percent_yes": 58.82880191216015, "percent_no": 41.17119808783985, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the South Bay Union School District to issue $5,000,0...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the South Bay Union School District to issue $5,000,000 in bonds to repair roofs, modernize classrooms and restrooms, and make health and safety improvements at South Bay and Pine Hill Schools. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $312,000 annually until the bonds are paid off.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.785583", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.355130", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve South Bay and Pine Hill Schools; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health and safety improvements; shall South Bay Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $5,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising on average $312,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, have independent citizens\u2019 oversight and NO money used for administrative salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2886, "fingerprint": "2020|202000149|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000149|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "fb2fd8be688b5ce9", "measure_id": "202000149", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a \u00be cent transaction and use tax be continued in the City of Trinidad for four years, starting on April 1, 2021?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 187, "no_votes": 72, "total_votes": 259, "percent_yes": 72.2007722007722, "percent_no": 27.799227799227793, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continued a three-quarter cent sales tax in the City of Trinidad...", "summary_text": "This measure continued a three-quarter cent sales tax in the City of Trinidad for four years beginning April 1, 2021.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.784103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.354171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a \u00be cent transaction and use tax be continued in the City of Trinidad for four years, starting on April 1, 2021?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2885, "fingerprint": "2020|202000148|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000148|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "e8ecc841108202e0", "measure_id": "202000148", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to extend the current \u00be\u00a2 transaction and use tax for an additional 8 years beyond the March 31, 2025 expiration date to provide approximately $1,400,000 annually to fund, maintain and improve essential services, including police services; nuisance abatement; streets, sidewalks, and drainage; parks maintenance; and programs for youth and seniors; and requiring independent annual financial audits and a community oversight committee, with all funds remaining in Fortuna, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3767, "no_votes": 1686, "total_votes": 5453, "percent_yes": 69.0812396845773, "percent_no": 30.918760315422702, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Fortuna's existing three-quarter cent sales tax for an a...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Fortuna's existing three-quarter cent sales tax for an additional 8 years beyond its 2025 expiration date to fund local services including police, infrastructure maintenance, parks, and youth and senior programs. The extension is estimated to generate approximately $1.4 million annually with requirements for independent audits and community oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.783834", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.353983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to extend the current \u00be\u00a2 transaction and use tax for an additional 8 years beyond the March 31, 2025 expiration date to provide approximately $1,400,000 annually to fund, maintain and improve essential services, including police services; nuisance abatement; streets, sidewalks, and drainage; parks maintenance; and programs for youth and seniors; and requiring independent annual financial audits and a community oversight committee, with all funds remaining in Fortuna, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2884, "fingerprint": "2020|202000147|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000147|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "41c9e385b81ab4ae", "measure_id": "202000147", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain police, fire, 911 emergency medical response; youth/senior services; local business and jobs support; street repair/road safety; community health services; homeless prevention programs; parks and recreation; and other essential services; shall an ordinance renewing the City of Eureka\u2019s voter-approved sales tax at the 1.25c rate be adopted until ended by voters, providing an estimated $9,600,000 annually, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds spent to benefit local residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8055, "no_votes": 4074, "total_votes": 12129, "percent_yes": 66.41108088053426, "percent_no": 33.58891911946574, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed Eureka's existing 1", "summary_text": "This measure renewed Eureka's existing 1.25% sales tax to continue funding various city services including public safety, infrastructure, social services, and parks, generating an estimated $9.6 million annually. The tax continues indefinitely until voters choose to end it, with provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.783552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.353795", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain police, fire, 911 emergency medical response; youth/senior services; local business and jobs support; street repair/road safety; community health services; homeless prevention programs; parks and recreation; and other essential services; shall an ordinance renewing the City of Eureka\u2019s voter-approved sales tax at the 1.25c rate be adopted until ended by voters, providing an estimated $9,600,000 annually, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds spent to benefit local residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2880, "fingerprint": "2020|202000021|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000021|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "96c2b637676a3a4f", "measure_id": "202000021", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a measure be approved allowing Humboldt County to obtain state and federal funding to construct, develop, or acquire housing for low income families, seniors, and people with disabilities within unincorporated areas, either directly or through assisting private projects, up to 2.5% of the total number of housing units existing in unincorporated Humboldt County, without raising taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24249, "no_votes": 11730, "total_votes": 35979, "percent_yes": 67.39764862836654, "percent_no": 32.60235137163346, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows Humboldt County to use state and federal funding to const...", "summary_text": "This measure allows Humboldt County to use state and federal funding to construct, develop, or acquire affordable housing for low-income families, seniors, and people with disabilities in unincorporated areas, capping such housing at 2.5% of existing housing units in those areas.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.782373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.353053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be approved allowing Humboldt County to obtain state and federal funding to construct, develop, or acquire housing for low income families, seniors, and people with disabilities within unincorporated areas, either directly or through assisting private projects, up to 2.5% of the total number of housing units existing in unincorporated Humboldt County, without raising taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2888, "fingerprint": "2020|202000500|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000500|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "2f90eef227950415", "measure_id": "202000500", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Cuddeback Elementary School; repair/replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; make health and safety improvements; and modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Cuddeback Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $730,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $50,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 133, "no_votes": 161, "total_votes": 294, "percent_yes": 45.23809523809524, "percent_no": 54.76190476190476, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have authorized the Cuddeback Union School District...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have authorized the Cuddeback Union School District to issue $730,000 in bonds to repair plumbing and electrical systems, make health and safety improvements, and modernize classrooms and facilities at Cuddeback Elementary School. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.784715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.354558", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Cuddeback Elementary School; repair/replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; make health and safety improvements; and modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Cuddeback Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $730,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $50,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2889, "fingerprint": "2020|202000501|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000501|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "b416950e596c9a4e", "measure_id": "202000501", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Cuddeback Elementary School; construct a new classroom/computer lab building; and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall Cuddeback Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $50,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125, "no_votes": 165, "total_votes": 290, "percent_yes": 43.103448275862064, "percent_no": 56.896551724137936, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized $700,000 in bonds for Cuddeback Union Schoo...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized $700,000 in bonds for Cuddeback Union School District to improve Cuddeback Elementary School, construct a new classroom/computer lab building, and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.785027", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.354751", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Cuddeback Elementary School; construct a new classroom/computer lab building; and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall Cuddeback Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $50,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2887, "fingerprint": "2020|202000499|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000499|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "16fa1e2cdf9eed26", "measure_id": "202000499", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of Bridgeville School; repair or replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and upgrade inadequate electrical systems; shall Bridgeville Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $1,200,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $85,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 127, "no_votes": 80, "total_votes": 207, "percent_yes": 61.35265700483091, "percent_no": 38.64734299516909, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Bridgeville Elementary School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Bridgeville Elementary School District to issue $1,200,000 in bonds to repair plumbing and sewer systems, modernize classrooms and facilities, and upgrade electrical systems at Bridgeville School. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $85,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.784378", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.354356", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of Bridgeville School; repair or replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and upgrade inadequate electrical systems; shall Bridgeville Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $1,200,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $85,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2890, "fingerprint": "2020|202000502|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000502|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "4cc62ebe8ebbcb42", "measure_id": "202000502", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair unsafe school buildings, storm drains, fields and facilities; improve campus, student and teacher safety/disabled accessibility; acquire, construct, repair sites, equipment/high school/continuing education facilities; qualify for emergency State matching funds, shall Eureka City Schools\u2019 measure authorizing $18,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $17/$100,000 assessed value ($1,100,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring annual independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9262, "no_votes": 7054, "total_votes": 16316, "percent_yes": 56.76636430497671, "percent_no": 43.23363569502329, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Eureka City Schools to issue $18 million in bonds to ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Eureka City Schools to issue $18 million in bonds to repair school buildings, improve safety and accessibility, and construct educational facilities, funded by a property tax levy of $17 per $100,000 of assessed value. The bonds require annual audits and citizen oversight, with funds restricted to local use.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.785305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.354941", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair unsafe school buildings, storm drains, fields and facilities; improve campus, student and teacher safety/disabled accessibility; acquire, construct, repair sites, equipment/high school/continuing education facilities; qualify for emergency State matching funds, shall Eureka City Schools\u2019 measure authorizing $18,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $17/$100,000 assessed value ($1,100,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring annual independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2895, "fingerprint": "2020|202000504|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000504|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "108c007703f8e9ba", "measure_id": "202000504", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize/renovate and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, make technology improvements, repair aging roofs, and make campus health and safety improvements, shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District measure authorizing $230,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately 5.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($12,760,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 331, "no_votes": 259, "total_votes": 590, "percent_yes": 56.10169491525424, "percent_no": 43.89830508474576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Coachella Valley Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Coachella Valley Unified School District to issue $230 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, construct facilities, upgrade technology, repair roofs, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 5.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.786791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.356029", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize/renovate and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, make technology improvements, repair aging roofs, and make campus health and safety improvements, shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District measure authorizing $230,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately 5.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($12,760,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2896, "fingerprint": "2020|202000505|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000505|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "0772731470f1a0b6", "measure_id": "202000505", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing outdated classrooms, restrooms and schools; expanding P.E. facilities; and constructing a new multipurpose room for school and community use; shall Imperial Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $30,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $1.76 million raised annually for issued bonds through maturity from tax rates of approximately 4.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all funds for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1600, "no_votes": 1775, "total_votes": 3375, "percent_yes": 47.40740740740741, "percent_no": 52.59259259259259, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Imperial Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Imperial Unified School District to issue $30 million in bonds to modernize classrooms and restrooms, expand physical education facilities, and construct a new multipurpose room. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 4.5 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.787097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.356258", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing outdated classrooms, restrooms and schools; expanding P.E. facilities; and constructing a new multipurpose room for school and community use; shall Imperial Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $30,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $1.76 million raised annually for issued bonds through maturity from tax rates of approximately 4.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all funds for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2897, "fingerprint": "2020|202000506|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000506|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "0e6095b03b66be34", "measure_id": "202000506", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To expand vocational /education facilities; repair high schools, middle schools and elementary schools including science /math classrooms; increase student internet/computer technology access; expand Calexico High School\u2019s student cafeteria; improve school security; upgrade school emergency preparedness; and create local construction jobs shall Calexico Unified School District\u2019s measure to issue $47 million of bonds be adopted with estimated annual payments less than 6\u20b5 /$100 of assessed value (averaging $2.5 million annually) until repaid, legal rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9486, "no_votes": 3170, "total_votes": 12656, "percent_yes": 74.95259165613149, "percent_no": 25.04740834386851, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Calexico Unified School District to issue $47 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Calexico Unified School District to issue $47 million in bonds to fund facility expansions, repairs to schools at all grade levels, technology upgrades, cafeteria expansion, security improvements, and emergency preparedness enhancements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of less than 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, averaging $2.5 million annually until fully repaid.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.787377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.356491", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand vocational /education facilities; repair high schools, middle schools and elementary schools including science /math classrooms; increase student internet/computer technology access; expand Calexico High School\u2019s student cafeteria; improve school security; upgrade school emergency preparedness; and create local construction jobs shall Calexico Unified School District\u2019s measure to issue $47 million of bonds be adopted with estimated annual payments less than 6\u20b5 /$100 of assessed value (averaging $2.5 million annually) until repaid, legal rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2893, "fingerprint": "2020|202000150|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000150|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "2bf5f02ba285fdc6", "measure_id": "202000150", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Brawley update the City\u2019s utility tax, which funds services, such as police, fire, administration, library and parks, by taking the use of various utilities, to cover changes in communication technology by extending the tax to cover, cell phone, VpIP, IP-TV, text messaging, paging, and private communication services, subject to future council action to reduce said percentage, and which is projected to raise $1.9 million per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2365, "no_votes": 5703, "total_votes": 8068, "percent_yes": 29.313336638572128, "percent_no": 70.68666336142788, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have extended Brawley's existing utility tax to cover mode...", "summary_text": "This measure would have extended Brawley's existing utility tax to cover modern communication services including cell phones, VoIP, IP-TV, text messaging, paging, and private communication services, with projected annual revenue of $1.9 million to fund city services. The measure also would have allowed the city council to reduce the tax percentage in the future.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.786199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.355563", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Brawley update the City\u2019s utility tax, which funds services, such as police, fire, administration, library and parks, by taking the use of various utilities, to cover changes in communication technology by extending the tax to cover, cell phone, VpIP, IP-TV, text messaging, paging, and private communication services, subject to future council action to reduce said percentage, and which is projected to raise $1.9 million per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2892, "fingerprint": "2020|202000151|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000151|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "24e2c9773afee062", "measure_id": "202000151", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk which is currently an elected position be converted to a position to be filled by City Council appointment commencing upon the expiration of the term of the current City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2654, "no_votes": 4752, "total_votes": 7406, "percent_yes": 35.8358088036727, "percent_no": 64.1641911963273, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the Imperial City Clerk position from an elec...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the Imperial City Clerk position from an elected office to one appointed by the City Council, beginning when the current elected clerk's term expires.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.785889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.355329", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk which is currently an elected position be converted to a position to be filled by City Council appointment commencing upon the expiration of the term of the current City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2894, "fingerprint": "2020|202000152|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000152|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "ada39b8436183091", "measure_id": "202000152", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Calipatria adopt an ordinance imposing a Utility Users Tax at a rate not to exceed five percent, upon the use of telephone, cell phone, electricity, gas, water, trash, sewer and cable television, to maintain general fund city services, including, but not limited to fire, administration, and parks and recreation, and subject to future council action to reduce said percentage, which is projected to raise $348,078.00 per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 194, "no_votes": 689, "total_votes": 883, "percent_yes": 21.970554926387308, "percent_no": 78.02944507361269, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a utility users tax of up to 5% on telephone, ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a utility users tax of up to 5% on telephone, cell phone, electricity, gas, water, trash, sewer, and cable television services in Calipatria to fund general city services. The tax was projected to generate approximately $348,078 annually for services including fire protection, administration, and parks and recreation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.786489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.355813", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Calipatria adopt an ordinance imposing a Utility Users Tax at a rate not to exceed five percent, upon the use of telephone, cell phone, electricity, gas, water, trash, sewer and cable television, to maintain general fund city services, including, but not limited to fire, administration, and parks and recreation, and subject to future council action to reduce said percentage, which is projected to raise $348,078.00 per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2899, "fingerprint": "2020|202000507|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000507|INYO", "content_hash": "bd697c18b80099e8", "measure_id": "202000507", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health and safety improvements; shall Lone Pine Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $14,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $813,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 4,5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 324, "no_votes": 454, "total_votes": 778, "percent_yes": 41.6452442159383, "percent_no": 58.3547557840617, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Lone Pine Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Lone Pine Unified School District to issue $14 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including HVAC systems, classrooms, and restrooms, funded through property tax levies of approximately 4.5 cents per $100 of assessed value. The measure failed with 41.6% voter approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.787915", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.356963", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health and safety improvements; shall Lone Pine Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $14,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $813,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 4,5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2898, "fingerprint": "2020|202000153|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000153|INYO", "content_hash": "f09ca5936b6f6993", "measure_id": "202000153", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide the City of Bishop with funding to maintain essential services such as police, fire, street  maintenance, and parks and recreation, shall an ordinance creating a one-cent transactions (sales) and use tax be adopted, providing approximately $1.8 million annually until repealed by voters, with all funds locally controlled and independently audited?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1161, "no_votes": 536, "total_votes": 1697, "percent_yes": 68.41484973482616, "percent_no": 31.585150265173837, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established a one-cent sales and use tax in the City of Bishop to...", "summary_text": "The measure established a one-cent sales and use tax in the City of Bishop to fund essential city services including police, fire, street maintenance, and parks and recreation. The tax generates approximately $1.8 million annually and remains in effect until repealed by voters, with funds subject to local control and independent auditing.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.787649", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.356724", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the City of Bishop with funding to maintain essential services such as police, fire, street  maintenance, and parks and recreation, shall an ordinance creating a one-cent transactions (sales) and use tax be adopted, providing approximately $1.8 million annually until repealed by voters, with all funds locally controlled and independently audited?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2904, "fingerprint": "2020|202000510|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000510|KERN", "content_hash": "16ab568f7391ae67", "measure_id": "202000510", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Wasco Union High School by constructing a new gymnasium; upgrading repairing, constructing, reconstructing and equipping related facilities to better serve students and the community; to qualify for potential State matching funds, shall Wasco Union High School District issue $38,950,000 in bonds repaying an annual average of $2,235,000, at approximately $29.41 per $100,000 of assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, at legal interest rates, with no funding for employee salaries or pensions, and required audits and citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1397, "no_votes": 1305, "total_votes": 2702, "percent_yes": 51.70244263508512, "percent_no": 48.29755736491488, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Wasco Union High School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Wasco Union High School District to issue $38,950,000 in bonds to construct a new gymnasium and upgrade school facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $29.41 per $100,000 of assessed property value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.789404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.358171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Wasco Union High School by constructing a new gymnasium; upgrading repairing, constructing, reconstructing and equipping related facilities to better serve students and the community; to qualify for potential State matching funds, shall Wasco Union High School District issue $38,950,000 in bonds repaying an annual average of $2,235,000, at approximately $29.41 per $100,000 of assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, at legal interest rates, with no funding for employee salaries or pensions, and required audits and citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2902, "fingerprint": "2020|202000508|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000508|KERN", "content_hash": "efb83fc3faf0d979", "measure_id": "202000508", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms/school facilities to improve the quality of education; repair/replace roofs; construct multi-purpose room/cafeteria at McFarland High; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites/equipment, shall the McFarland Unified School District measure be adopted to issue $30,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy on average $5.1 cents per $100 assessed value, generating approximately $1,850,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 836, "no_votes": 592, "total_votes": 1428, "percent_yes": 58.543417366946784, "percent_no": 41.456582633053216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the McFarland Unified School District to issue $30 mi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the McFarland Unified School District to issue $30 million in bonds to modernize and construct school facilities, including classrooms, restrooms, roofs, and a multi-purpose room/cafeteria at McFarland High School. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of $5.1 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.788793", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.357688", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms/school facilities to improve the quality of education; repair/replace roofs; construct multi-purpose room/cafeteria at McFarland High; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites/equipment, shall the McFarland Unified School District measure be adopted to issue $30,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy on average $5.1 cents per $100 assessed value, generating approximately $1,850,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2903, "fingerprint": "2020|202000509|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000509|KERN", "content_hash": "60e6921dc9a4f8d2", "measure_id": "202000509", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local elementary and middle schools; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities; shall Wasco Union School District's measure be adopted authorizing $16,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $940,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1307, "no_votes": 1113, "total_votes": 2420, "percent_yes": 54.00826446280992, "percent_no": 45.99173553719008, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Wasco Union School District to issue $1...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Wasco Union School District to issue $16 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and restroom modernization, health and safety upgrades, and P.E. field improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.789073", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.357927", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local elementary and middle schools; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities; shall Wasco Union School District's measure be adopted authorizing $16,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $940,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2900, "fingerprint": "2020|202000022|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000022|KERN", "content_hash": "69906c65a26a623d", "measure_id": "202000022", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall County adopt the ordinance proposed by Initiative, Medicinal Cannabis Measure, allowing medicinal cannabis retail, cultivating and manufacturing; allow medicinal cannabis retail operating before January 1, 2018 to reopen, relocate, and expand in unincorporated area, subject to state licensing requirements and 1000 foot setbacks from legal medicinal shops and schools; allow activity without conditional use permit; and allow County to levy perpetual 3.75% special business tax per every $1000.00 of gross income {fiscal impact unknown}?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64488, "no_votes": 90058, "total_votes": 154546, "percent_yes": 41.72738213865127, "percent_no": 58.27261786134873, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed medicinal cannabis retail, cultivation, and m...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed medicinal cannabis retail, cultivation, and manufacturing in unincorporated areas of Kern County, permitted existing pre-2018 medicinal cannabis retailers to reopen and expand, and authorized a 3.75% special business tax on gross income from these cannabis businesses.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.788220", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.357203", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall County adopt the ordinance proposed by Initiative, Medicinal Cannabis Measure, allowing medicinal cannabis retail, cultivating and manufacturing; allow medicinal cannabis retail operating before January 1, 2018 to reopen, relocate, and expand in unincorporated area, subject to state licensing requirements and 1000 foot setbacks from legal medicinal shops and schools; allow activity without conditional use permit; and allow County to levy perpetual 3.75% special business tax per every $1000.00 of gross income {fiscal impact unknown}?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2901, "fingerprint": "2020|202000023|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000023|KERN", "content_hash": "d1194e9d65271453", "measure_id": "202000023", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall County adopt the ordinance proposed by County, Kern Medicinal Cannabis Retail Store Initiative, allowing and regulating medicinal cannabis in unincorporated area, subject to conditional use permit after public hearing, state licensing requirements, setbacks of 1000 feet from legal medicinal shops, schools, public parks, youth centers, libraries, churches, city limits, or 350 feet from any residence; and levying a perpetual 3.5% general purpose business tax per every $1000.00 of gross income [fiscal impact unknown]?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 67049, "no_votes": 86884, "total_votes": 153933, "percent_yes": 43.55726192564297, "percent_no": 56.44273807435703, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed and regulated medicinal cannabis retail store...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed and regulated medicinal cannabis retail stores in unincorporated areas of Kern County, requiring conditional use permits and maintaining specific distance requirements from schools, churches, residences and other locations. It would have also imposed a 3.5% business tax on gross income from these establishments.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.788522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.357443", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall County adopt the ordinance proposed by County, Kern Medicinal Cannabis Retail Store Initiative, allowing and regulating medicinal cannabis in unincorporated area, subject to conditional use permit after public hearing, state licensing requirements, setbacks of 1000 feet from legal medicinal shops, schools, public parks, youth centers, libraries, churches, city limits, or 350 feet from any residence; and levying a perpetual 3.5% general purpose business tax per every $1000.00 of gross income [fiscal impact unknown]?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2906, "fingerprint": "2020|202000512|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000512|KERN", "content_hash": "89242e7a3b92b220", "measure_id": "202000512", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve school safety, modernize and replace existing classrooms, increase student access to modern classroom technology and computers, improve support facilities for school and community use, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Maricopa Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing up to $14,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average of $845,000 annually, with projected levies of $0.050 per $100 of assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 323, "no_votes": 314, "total_votes": 637, "percent_yes": 50.706436420722135, "percent_no": 49.293563579277865, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Maricopa Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Maricopa Unified School District to issue up to $14 million in bonds to improve school safety, modernize classrooms, upgrade technology, and enhance support facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a projected rate of $0.050 per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.790016", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.358649", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve school safety, modernize and replace existing classrooms, increase student access to modern classroom technology and computers, improve support facilities for school and community use, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Maricopa Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing up to $14,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average of $845,000 annually, with projected levies of $0.050 per $100 of assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2905, "fingerprint": "2020|202000511|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000511|KERN", "content_hash": "46096ea76f026f3a", "measure_id": "202000511", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to construct/upgrade classrooms, science labs, and school facilities to relieve overcrowding and support student achievement in math, science, engineering, reading, arts, and technology; improve student safety/security, install intruder protection systems; remove asbestos/lead pipes; repair roofs/plumbing/electrical, shall the Greenfield Union School District measure authorizing $21,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($1,300,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight/all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9198, "no_votes": 3675, "total_votes": 12873, "percent_yes": 71.45187601957585, "percent_no": 28.54812398042415, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Greenfield Union School District to issue $21 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Greenfield Union School District to issue $21 million in bonds to construct and upgrade classrooms, science labs, and school facilities, as well as improve safety systems and repair building infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $1.3 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.789716", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.358404", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to construct/upgrade classrooms, science labs, and school facilities to relieve overcrowding and support student achievement in math, science, engineering, reading, arts, and technology; improve student safety/security, install intruder protection systems; remove asbestos/lead pipes; repair roofs/plumbing/electrical, shall the Greenfield Union School District measure authorizing $21,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($1,300,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight/all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2907, "fingerprint": "2020|202000513|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000513|KERN", "content_hash": "4c2a10d6e6732375", "measure_id": "202000513", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; construct a master kitchen; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize/construct/upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Wasco Union School District's measure be adopted authorizing $16,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $940,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2466, "no_votes": 2464, "total_votes": 4930, "percent_yes": 50.02028397565923, "percent_no": 49.97971602434077, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Wasco Union School District to issue $1...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Wasco Union School District to issue $16 million in bonds to construct and modernize school facilities, including classrooms, restrooms, a master kitchen, and health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $940,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.790284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.358893", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; construct a master kitchen; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize/construct/upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Wasco Union School District's measure be adopted authorizing $16,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $940,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2910, "fingerprint": "2020|202000515|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000515|KINGS", "content_hash": "36daf2a64f78db05", "measure_id": "202000515", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of high school facilities without increasing the estimated tax rate; repair/replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $17,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 94, "no_votes": 133, "total_votes": 227, "percent_yes": 41.40969162995594, "percent_no": 58.59030837004406, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Kingsburg Joint Union High School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District to issue $17 million in bonds to repair roofs, upgrade technology access, and modernize classrooms and facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $1 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.791189", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.359549", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of high school facilities without increasing the estimated tax rate; repair/replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $17,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2909, "fingerprint": "2020|202000514|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000514|KINGS", "content_hash": "c043d9270b845dd1", "measure_id": "202000514", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade aging elementary and middle school facilities, make health, safety and security improvements, modernize outdated school facilities, and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms, shall the Hanford Elementary School District measure be adopted to issue $23,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with projected levies of $24 per $100,000 assessed value, raising an average $1,360,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3428, "no_votes": 3931, "total_votes": 7359, "percent_yes": 46.58241608914255, "percent_no": 53.41758391085745, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Hanford Elementary School District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Hanford Elementary School District to issue $23 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, replace portable classrooms, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately $24 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.790882", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.359343", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade aging elementary and middle school facilities, make health, safety and security improvements, modernize outdated school facilities, and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms, shall the Hanford Elementary School District measure be adopted to issue $23,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with projected levies of $24 per $100,000 assessed value, raising an average $1,360,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2913, "fingerprint": "2020|202000518|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000518|KINGS", "content_hash": "e2d7036c1205302f", "measure_id": "202000518", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To expand vocational education facilities and construct permanent classrooms to replace portables; renovate classrooms, athletic facilities and schools; and replace aging roofs and outdated fire alarm and heating/air conditioning systems, shall Riverdale Joint Unified School District's measure authorizing $25,900,000 in bonds with legal rates, estimated levies through 2052 of less than 6 cents per $100 assessed value (averaging $1 ,411,000 annually), annual audits, citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries/pensions and all money benefitting local schools be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64, "no_votes": 54, "total_votes": 118, "percent_yes": 54.23728813559322, "percent_no": 45.76271186440678, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Riverdale Joint Unified School Distric...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Riverdale Joint Unified School District to issue $25,900,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including expanding vocational education facilities, constructing permanent classrooms to replace portable ones, renovating existing facilities, and upgrading infrastructure systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of less than 6 cents per $100 of assessed value through 2052.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.792034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.360142", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand vocational education facilities and construct permanent classrooms to replace portables; renovate classrooms, athletic facilities and schools; and replace aging roofs and outdated fire alarm and heating/air conditioning systems, shall Riverdale Joint Unified School District's measure authorizing $25,900,000 in bonds with legal rates, estimated levies through 2052 of less than 6 cents per $100 assessed value (averaging $1 ,411,000 annually), annual audits, citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries/pensions and all money benefitting local schools be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2908, "fingerprint": "2020|202000154|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000154|KINGS", "content_hash": "088d21b1c5bfa4a9", "measure_id": "202000154", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To generate approximately $1,800,000 annually for seven years to maintain local police and fire services including prevention and enforcement shall the City of Lemoore enact a 1 percent sales and use tax, requiring a citizens' oversight committee and annual reporting of expenses, with all funds generated staying in the City of Lemoore?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4367, "no_votes": 4623, "total_votes": 8990, "percent_yes": 48.5761957730812, "percent_no": 51.4238042269188, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted a 1% sales and use tax in Lemoore for seven ye...", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted a 1% sales and use tax in Lemoore for seven years to generate approximately $1.8 million annually for maintaining local police and fire services. The tax would have required a citizens' oversight committee and annual expense reporting, with all funds remaining within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-04", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.790599", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.359131", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To generate approximately $1,800,000 annually for seven years to maintain local police and fire services including prevention and enforcement shall the City of Lemoore enact a 1 percent sales and use tax, requiring a citizens' oversight committee and annual reporting of expenses, with all funds generated staying in the City of Lemoore?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2911, "fingerprint": "2020|202000516|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000516|KINGS", "content_hash": "f6b1ef3f95253713", "measure_id": "202000516", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and security improvements, shall the Lemoore Union High School District measure authorizing $26,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately 2.8 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($1,590,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a board appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds and all money staying local, without increasing current tax rates, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2346, "no_votes": 2950, "total_votes": 5296, "percent_yes": 44.29758308157099, "percent_no": 55.70241691842901, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Lemoore Union High School District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Lemoore Union High School District to issue $26 million in bonds to modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, and make health, safety and security improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes of approximately 2.8 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.791495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.359755", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and security improvements, shall the Lemoore Union High School District measure authorizing $26,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately 2.8 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($1,590,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a board appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds and all money staying local, without increasing current tax rates, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2912, "fingerprint": "2020|202000517|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000517|KINGS", "content_hash": "eb01139eac97c247", "measure_id": "202000517", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and replace classroom facilities, including roofing, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems, and improve student health, safety, security and access, shall the Waukena Joint Union School District measure be adopted to issue $1.65 million in bonds at legal rates with projected levies of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising an average $113,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring citizens oversight and annual audits and no bond money spent on salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 2, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the Waukena Joint Union School District to issue $1", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the Waukena Joint Union School District to issue $1.65 million in bonds to repair and replace classroom facilities, including roofing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $113,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.791768", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.359956", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and replace classroom facilities, including roofing, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems, and improve student health, safety, security and access, shall the Waukena Joint Union School District measure be adopted to issue $1.65 million in bonds at legal rates with projected levies of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising an average $113,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring citizens oversight and annual audits and no bond money spent on salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2914, "fingerprint": "2020|202000519|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000519|LAKE", "content_hash": "535ed9ad4495c650", "measure_id": "202000519", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2999, "no_votes": 4722, "total_votes": 7721, "percent_yes": 38.842118896516, "percent_no": 61.157881103484, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to issue $228.4 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct classrooms and buildings for career and technical education programs across its campuses. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.792300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.360338", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2915, "fingerprint": "2020|202000155|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000155|LASSEN", "content_hash": "b12accb804836935", "measure_id": "202000155", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 19-1018 of the City of Susanville, authorizing the City of Susanville to impose a special transaction and use tax in the total amount of one percent to be used solely for Public Safety Services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1230, "no_votes": 1158, "total_votes": 2388, "percent_yes": 51.507537688442206, "percent_no": 48.492462311557794, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the City of Susanville to impose a 1% spec...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the City of Susanville to impose a 1% special sales tax dedicated exclusively to funding public safety services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.792616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.360526", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 19-1018 of the City of Susanville, authorizing the City of Susanville to impose a special transaction and use tax in the total amount of one percent to be used solely for Public Safety Services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2989, "fingerprint": "2020|202000531|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000531|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ee160361a5ced5a5", "measure_id": "202000531", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Jose Lara be recalled (removed) from the office of Board of Education of the El Rancho Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5087, "no_votes": 461, "total_votes": 5548, "percent_yes": 91.69069935111752, "percent_no": 8.309300648882484, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would remove Jose Lara from his position on the El Rancho Unifie...", "summary_text": "This measure would remove Jose Lara from his position on the El Rancho Unified School District Board of Education. The recall passed with 91.7% of voters supporting Lara's removal from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-06-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.824227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.379453", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jose Lara be recalled (removed) from the office of Board of Education of the El Rancho Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2990, "fingerprint": "2020|202000532|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000532|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "227e9a142fad4b6d", "measure_id": "202000532", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Leanne M. Ibarra be recalled (removed) from the office of Board of Education of the El Rancho Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4844, "no_votes": 728, "total_votes": 5572, "percent_yes": 86.93467336683418, "percent_no": 13.065326633165824, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Leanne M", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Leanne M. Ibarra from her position on the El Rancho Unified School District Board of Education. The recall passed with 86.9% approval, removing her from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-06-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.824675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.379635", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Leanne M. Ibarra be recalled (removed) from the office of Board of Education of the El Rancho Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2939, "fingerprint": "2020|202000196|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000196|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b6dea4dccf5d7365", "measure_id": "202000196", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Abraham Cruz be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember, City of Industry, County of Los Angeles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 41, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure recalled Abraham Cruz from his position as Councilmember for the...", "summary_text": "This measure recalled Abraham Cruz from his position as Councilmember for the City of Industry in Los Angeles County. The recall passed, resulting in Cruz's removal from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-07-21", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.800441", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.365447", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Abraham Cruz be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember, City of Industry, County of Los Angeles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11104, "fingerprint": "2020|202000201|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000201|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "475a3c90f9696d22", "measure_id": "202000201", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve and stabilize funding for essential City services and infrastructure, including police services, aquatic center construction, street maintenance, senior and special needs services, recreation programs and facilities and other public purposes, shall a 3/4% transactions (sales) and use tax, subject to annual reporting, be established to raise approximately $2,330,000 per year until ended by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5972, "no_votes": 3579, "total_votes": 9551, "percent_yes": 62.52748403308554, "percent_no": 37.47251596691446, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales and use tax in Los Angeles to fund city services including police, street maintenance, recreation programs, and infrastructure projects, generating approximately $2.33 million annually. The tax includes annual reporting requirements and can only be ended by voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.390447", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.811608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.372347", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve and stabilize funding for essential City services and infrastructure, including police services, aquatic center construction, street maintenance, senior and special needs services, recreation programs and facilities and other public purposes, shall a 3/4% transactions (sales) and use tax, subject to annual reporting, be established to raise approximately $2,330,000 per year until ended by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2960, "fingerprint": "2020|202000174|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000174|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d8c7445b504667cf", "measure_id": "202000174", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain 911 emergency response services, police, fire, parks, libraries, repair streets, and support general services, shall an ordinance be adopted extending the City of Long Beach's Transactions and Use Tax beyond 2027, generating approximately $60 million annually, at a 1% rate until December 31, 2022, at \u00be% until September 30, 2027, and at 1% from October 1, 2027 until ended by voters, requiring a citizens' advisory committee and annual independent audits, with all funds remaining in Long Beach?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49676, "no_votes": 49660, "total_votes": 99336, "percent_yes": 50.0080534750745, "percent_no": 49.9919465249255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Long Beach's 1% sales tax beyond 2027 to fund 911 servic...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Long Beach's 1% sales tax beyond 2027 to fund 911 services, police, fire, parks, libraries, street repairs, and general city services, generating approximately $60 million annually. The tax rate would be 1% until December 2022, then \u00be% until September 2027, then return to 1% indefinitely unless ended by voters, with oversight through a citizens' advisory committee and annual audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.807672", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.369883", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain 911 emergency response services, police, fire, parks, libraries, repair streets, and support general services, shall an ordinance be adopted extending the City of Long Beach's Transactions and Use Tax beyond 2027, generating approximately $60 million annually, at a 1% rate until December 31, 2022, at \u00be% until September 30, 2027, and at 1% from October 1, 2027 until ended by voters, requiring a citizens' advisory committee and annual independent audits, with all funds remaining in Long Beach?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11127, "fingerprint": "2020|202000540|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000540|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ec4ee016d58333ae", "measure_id": "202000540", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade neighborhood schools, which retain/attract quality teachers; upgrading career education, science/computer classrooms, removing asbestos, improving school safety, constructing, acquiring, repairing, classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall the Whittier Union High School District measure authorizing $183,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, averaging $14,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring audits/citizen oversight, without increasing current tax rate limits, all funds for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62880, "no_votes": 29718, "total_votes": 92598, "percent_yes": 67.90643426423897, "percent_no": 32.09356573576103, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Whittier Union High School District to issue $183...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Whittier Union High School District to issue $183,500,000 in bonds to fund school facility improvements including classroom upgrades, safety improvements, asbestos removal, and equipment purchases. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.401258", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.826948", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.381088", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade neighborhood schools, which retain/attract quality teachers; upgrading career education, science/computer classrooms, removing asbestos, improving school safety, constructing, acquiring, repairing, classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall the Whittier Union High School District measure authorizing $183,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, averaging $14,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring audits/citizen oversight, without increasing current tax rate limits, all funds for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2950, "fingerprint": "2020|202000157|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000157|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7314bf5a00aa50ba", "measure_id": "202000157", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted establishing a 3/4% transactions and use (sales) tax providing approximately $2,200,000 annually until ended by voters, to fund general City services, such as public safety, parks and recreation services, maintaining public infrastructure like streets, sidewalks, parks and facilities, requiring annual independent audits with all funds benefiting Artesia residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1287, "no_votes": 1337, "total_votes": 2624, "percent_yes": 49.04725609756097, "percent_no": 50.95274390243903, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 0.75% sales tax in Artesia, California, expected to generate approximately $2.2 million annually to fund general city services including public safety, parks and recreation, and infrastructure maintenance. The tax would have required annual independent audits and would remain in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.803754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.367474", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted establishing a 3/4% transactions and use (sales) tax providing approximately $2,200,000 annually until ended by voters, to fund general City services, such as public safety, parks and recreation services, maintaining public infrastructure like streets, sidewalks, parks and facilities, requiring annual independent audits with all funds benefiting Artesia residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2942, "fingerprint": "2020|202000234|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000234|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b1107e579eff1af9", "measure_id": "202000234", "measure_letter": "AB", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to repeal provisions setting rules for appointing candidates and promoting employees into the Civil Service, to enable the City Council to advance equity-based hiring within the appointment and promotional processes and strengthen the City's workforce?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27768, "no_votes": 18371, "total_votes": 46139, "percent_yes": 60.18335898047206, "percent_no": 39.81664101952794, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment repealed existing civil service rules for appointing c...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment repealed existing civil service rules for appointing candidates and promoting employees, giving the City Council authority to implement equity-based hiring and promotion processes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.801248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.366000", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to repeal provisions setting rules for appointing candidates and promoting employees into the Civil Service, to enable the City Council to advance equity-based hiring within the appointment and promotional processes and strengthen the City's workforce?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2943, "fingerprint": "2020|202000236|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000236|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "202000236", "measure_letter": "AC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3931, "no_votes": 2121, "total_votes": 6052, "percent_yes": 64.95373430270985, "percent_no": 35.04626569729015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.801546", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.366179", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2927, "fingerprint": "2020|202000207|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000207|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ccc9af3f43b26d50", "measure_id": "202000207", "measure_letter": "AE", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 741 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 733 between the City of Commerce and A&E Investment Group, LLC for the change of membership and ownership of A&E Investment Group, LLC, previously approved to operate a commercial cannabis business be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1994, "no_votes": 2597, "total_votes": 4591, "percent_yes": 43.43280331082553, "percent_no": 56.56719668917447, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have approved an amendment to a development agreement that ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have approved an amendment to a development agreement that allows a change in membership and ownership of A&E Investment Group, LLC, which was previously approved to operate a commercial cannabis business in Commerce, California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.796056", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.362767", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 741 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 733 between the City of Commerce and A&E Investment Group, LLC for the change of membership and ownership of A&E Investment Group, LLC, previously approved to operate a commercial cannabis business be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2949, "fingerprint": "2020|202000156|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000156|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d7a91b4485e55777", "measure_id": "202000156", "measure_letter": "AL", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect City of Alhambra's long-term financial stability; maintain fire, police, emergency response/school safety; preventing thefts/burglaries; repairing streets/potholes; recruit/retain well-trained police/firefighters; keep public areas safe/clean; maintain gang prevention, afterschool and senior programs/other general services; shall the measure be adopted approving an ordinance establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $8,100,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9025, "no_votes": 5152, "total_votes": 14177, "percent_yes": 63.65944840234182, "percent_no": 36.34055159765818, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75-cent sales tax in the City of Alhambra to generate approximately $8.1 million annually for general municipal services including public safety, street repairs, and community programs. The tax remains in effect until repealed by voters and requires regular audits with all funds designated for local use.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.803385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.367276", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect City of Alhambra's long-term financial stability; maintain fire, police, emergency response/school safety; preventing thefts/burglaries; repairing streets/potholes; recruit/retain well-trained police/firefighters; keep public areas safe/clean; maintain gang prevention, afterschool and senior programs/other general services; shall the measure be adopted approving an ordinance establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $8,100,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2977, "fingerprint": "2020|202000227|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000227|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bce2b5fe7f402a56", "measure_id": "202000227", "measure_letter": "AV", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance protecting Palmdale's long-term financial stability; maintaining essential city services; repairing streets/potholes; addressing homelessness; maintaining 911 emergency response; keeping public areas safe/clean for all; retaining local businesses; protecting local water sources; maintaining veterans, senior, mental health, community programs; by establishing a \u00be-cent sales tax, providing approximately $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring citizen oversight, public spending disclosures; all funds used locally in Palmdale, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34355, "no_votes": 22554, "total_votes": 56909, "percent_yes": 60.36830729761549, "percent_no": 39.63169270238451, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75-cent sales tax in Palmdale to generate approximately $12 million annually for city services including street repairs, emergency response, homelessness programs, and other municipal operations. The tax includes citizen oversight and public disclosure requirements, and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.816227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.374605", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance protecting Palmdale's long-term financial stability; maintaining essential city services; repairing streets/potholes; addressing homelessness; maintaining 911 emergency response; keeping public areas safe/clean for all; retaining local businesses; protecting local water sources; maintaining veterans, senior, mental health, community programs; by establishing a \u00be-cent sales tax, providing approximately $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring citizen oversight, public spending disclosures; all funds used locally in Palmdale, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11112, "fingerprint": "2020|202000191|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000191|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e542f5a7c2b8b1b7", "measure_id": "202000191", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Lancaster adopt an ordinance increasing the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel, motel, or other lodging guests staying within the City of Lancaster for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or less by 2%, providing approximately $642,537.23 in increased annual revenue to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6153, "no_votes": 6342, "total_votes": 12495, "percent_yes": 49.2436974789916, "percent_no": 50.7563025210084, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased the transient occupancy tax on hotel, motel,...", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased the transient occupancy tax on hotel, motel, and other short-term lodging guests in Lancaster by 2%, generating an estimated $642,537 in additional annual revenue for the city.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-04-14", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.395349", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.818884", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.376267", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Lancaster adopt an ordinance increasing the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel, motel, or other lodging guests staying within the City of Lancaster for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or less by 2%, providing approximately $642,537.23 in increased annual revenue to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11099, "fingerprint": "2020|202000175|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000175|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "86609089d12b7333", "measure_id": "202000175", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for student arts education programs, community arts, music, cultural programs and organizations, local museums and theaters, and the Long Beach Convention and Entertainment Center, and maintain other general fund programs shall a measure be adopted increasing Long Beach's general transient occupancy (hotel bed) tax rate from 6% to 7%, paid for by hotel/motel guests, generating approximately $2.8 million dollars annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits and local control of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59190, "no_votes": 40775, "total_votes": 99965, "percent_yes": 59.21072375331365, "percent_no": 40.78927624668635, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Long Beach's transient occupancy tax on hotel and mote...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Long Beach's transient occupancy tax on hotel and motel guests from 6% to 7% to generate approximately $2.8 million annually for student arts education, community arts programs, cultural organizations, local museums and theaters, and the Long Beach Convention and Entertainment Center. The tax increase requires audits and local control of funds and will continue until ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.388168", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.807944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.370073", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for student arts education programs, community arts, music, cultural programs and organizations, local museums and theaters, and the Long Beach Convention and Entertainment Center, and maintain other general fund programs shall a measure be adopted increasing Long Beach's general transient occupancy (hotel bed) tax rate from 6% to 7%, paid for by hotel/motel guests, generating approximately $2.8 million dollars annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits and local control of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2947, "fingerprint": "2020|202000214|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000214|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d03a90074bbcfd72", "measure_id": "202000214", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adding Culver City Municipal Code Section 15.09.100 requiring voter approval of any ordinance establishing interim or permanent rent control or prohibition on residential rent increases in the City of Culver City, including any ordinance establishing rent control adopted by the Culver City City Council after January 1, 2019, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10211, "no_votes": 12231, "total_votes": 22442, "percent_yes": 45.499509847607165, "percent_no": 54.500490152392835, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required voter approval for any current or future ren...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required voter approval for any current or future rent control ordinances in Culver City, including retroactively applying to rent control measures adopted by the City Council after January 1, 2019. The measure failed with 45.5% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.802806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.366917", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adding Culver City Municipal Code Section 15.09.100 requiring voter approval of any ordinance establishing interim or permanent rent control or prohibition on residential rent increases in the City of Culver City, including any ordinance establishing rent control adopted by the Culver City City Council after January 1, 2019, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11121, "fingerprint": "2020|202000533|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000533|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c7da520316e3d5ff", "measure_id": "202000533", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve school facilities, by replacing leaking roofs, improving student access to technology, repairing and upgrading security/fire/earthquake systems, modernizing, acquiring, constructing, repairing classrooms, restrooms, and facilities, shall Bassett Unified School District issue $50 million of bonds, within legal interest rates, averaging $2.66 million annually for 36 years (estimated), at projected rates of 6 cents per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5946, "no_votes": 2556, "total_votes": 8502, "percent_yes": 69.93648553281581, "percent_no": 30.06351446718419, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Bassett Unified School District to issue $50 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Bassett Unified School District to issue $50 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including roofs, classrooms, restrooms, and safety systems. The bonds would be repaid over approximately 36 years through property taxes at an estimated rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.399793", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.824952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.379815", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve school facilities, by replacing leaking roofs, improving student access to technology, repairing and upgrading security/fire/earthquake systems, modernizing, acquiring, constructing, repairing classrooms, restrooms, and facilities, shall Bassett Unified School District issue $50 million of bonds, within legal interest rates, averaging $2.66 million annually for 36 years (estimated), at projected rates of 6 cents per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2951, "fingerprint": "2020|202000158|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000158|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "763b5d2eff5a0f31", "measure_id": "202000158", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted amending the Artesia Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from 12.5% to 15%, providing approximately $84,000 in additional annual revenue until ended by voters to maintain general City services such as public safety, parks and recreation services, maintaining public infrastructure like streets, sidewalks, parks and facilities; and applying the tax to all rent charged to hotel guests, including by online travel and short term rental companies, for transient occupancy of any hotel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1210, "no_votes": 1396, "total_votes": 2606, "percent_yes": 46.4313123561013, "percent_no": 53.5686876438987, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased Artesia's transient occupancy tax from 12", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased Artesia's transient occupancy tax from 12.5% to 15% and expanded it to apply to all rent charged by hotels, online travel companies, and short-term rental companies. The change was projected to generate approximately $84,000 in additional annual revenue for general city services including public safety, parks, recreation, and infrastructure maintenance.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.804034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.367660", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted amending the Artesia Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from 12.5% to 15%, providing approximately $84,000 in additional annual revenue until ended by voters to maintain general City services such as public safety, parks and recreation services, maintaining public infrastructure like streets, sidewalks, parks and facilities; and applying the tax to all rent charged to hotel guests, including by online travel and short term rental companies, for transient occupancy of any hotel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11113, "fingerprint": "2020|202000205|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000205|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9467fdc9bb569766", "measure_id": "202000205", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure imposing a City of Calabasas tax of up to 10% on cannabis businesses, without changing the City's existing prohibition on cannabis dispensaries, raising up to $10,000 each year until voters decide otherwise, with additional revenue of up to $300,000 per dispensary expected if the state or City ever allow cannabis dispensaries to operate in the City, to fund general City services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7732, "no_votes": 4919, "total_votes": 12651, "percent_yes": 61.11769820567544, "percent_no": 38.88230179432456, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a tax of up to 10% on cannabis businesses in Calabasas, ...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a tax of up to 10% on cannabis businesses in Calabasas, with expected revenue of up to $10,000 annually under current city prohibitions on dispensaries, and up to $300,000 per dispensary if dispensaries are ever allowed to operate in the city. The tax revenue would fund general city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.395727", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.819443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.376698", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure imposing a City of Calabasas tax of up to 10% on cannabis businesses, without changing the City's existing prohibition on cannabis dispensaries, raising up to $10,000 each year until voters decide otherwise, with additional revenue of up to $300,000 per dispensary expected if the state or City ever allow cannabis dispensaries to operate in the City, to fund general City services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11096, "fingerprint": "2020|202000165|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000165|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "535e5dfac817db8f", "measure_id": "202000165", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to establish a general, three-quarters percent (0.75%) local transactions and use (sales) tax, raising an estimated $11.4 million annually, and ending when voters decide to do so, subject to independent audits and public reports of spending, to provide and maintain a high level of City services, including, but not limited to, local sheriff's and community safety, sidewalk and street maintenance and repair, tree-trimming, library services, and parks and recreation services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4637, "no_votes": 9616, "total_votes": 14253, "percent_yes": 32.53350171893636, "percent_no": 67.46649828106365, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a 0.75% local sales tax in Los Angeles, raising an estimated $11.4 million annually to fund city services including sheriff and community safety, street and sidewalk maintenance, tree trimming, library services, and parks and recreation. The tax would have continued indefinitely until voters decided to end it, with spending subject to independent audits and public reporting.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.386488", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.805219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.368402", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to establish a general, three-quarters percent (0.75%) local transactions and use (sales) tax, raising an estimated $11.4 million annually, and ending when voters decide to do so, subject to independent audits and public reports of spending, to provide and maintain a high level of City services, including, but not limited to, local sheriff's and community safety, sidewalk and street maintenance and repair, tree-trimming, library services, and parks and recreation services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2925, "fingerprint": "2020|202000194|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000194|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d7a2aa1680c551ac", "measure_id": "202000194", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 731 of the City Council of the City of Commerce Approving and Adopting Development Agreement No. 18-032 between the City of Commerce and Citadel Holdings Group, LLC for the Improvement and Expansion of the Citadel Shopping Outlet Center; Making findings consistent with and pursuant to Government Code Section 65867.5; Making findings of a CEQA Environmental Impact Report be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1177, "no_votes": 578, "total_votes": 1755, "percent_yes": 67.06552706552706, "percent_no": 32.934472934472936, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance approved a development agreement between the City of Commerce ...", "summary_text": "This ordinance approved a development agreement between the City of Commerce and Citadel Holdings Group, LLC for the improvement and expansion of the Citadel Shopping Outlet Center. The measure also adopted required environmental impact report findings under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-06-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.795414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.362399", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 731 of the City Council of the City of Commerce Approving and Adopting Development Agreement No. 18-032 between the City of Commerce and Citadel Holdings Group, LLC for the Improvement and Expansion of the Citadel Shopping Outlet Center; Making findings consistent with and pursuant to Government Code Section 65867.5; Making findings of a CEQA Environmental Impact Report be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11114, "fingerprint": "2020|202000218|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000218|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3e112ce1ea025e80", "measure_id": "202000218", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Hawthorne Cannabis Business Tax Ordinance of 2020 be approved, imposing a 5% cannabis business tax on the gross receipts of cannabis businesses, until ended by voters (This tax will generate no revenues initially, but would generate revenue if, in the future, cannabis businesses are permitted or exist in the City)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18304, "no_votes": 11464, "total_votes": 29768, "percent_yes": 61.48884708411717, "percent_no": 38.51115291588283, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure approved a 5% tax on gross receipts of cannabis businesses in Haw...", "summary_text": "The measure approved a 5% tax on gross receipts of cannabis businesses in Hawthorne, California, which would only generate revenue if cannabis businesses are permitted to operate in the city in the future.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.395914", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.819836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.376882", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Hawthorne Cannabis Business Tax Ordinance of 2020 be approved, imposing a 5% cannabis business tax on the gross receipts of cannabis businesses, until ended by voters (This tax will generate no revenues initially, but would generate revenue if, in the future, cannabis businesses are permitted or exist in the City)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11097, "fingerprint": "2020|202000166|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000166|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5789f0f0125eef67", "measure_id": "202000166", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to maintain 911 emergency response services by retaining firefighters/ police officers/ paramedics; addressing homelessness; fixing potholes/streets; maintaining storm drains, parks, after-school programs, senior services, and other general fund services, by continuing the voter approved one-half cent sales tax, generating approximately 9.8 million dollars annually, until March 31, 2033, requiring independent annual audits, all funds used locally, with no tax rate increase, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10863, "no_votes": 3257, "total_votes": 14120, "percent_yes": 76.93342776203966, "percent_no": 23.066572237960344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continued an existing half-cent sales tax in Los Angeles until M...", "summary_text": "This measure continued an existing half-cent sales tax in Los Angeles until March 31, 2033, to fund emergency services, infrastructure maintenance, homelessness programs, and other general city services, generating approximately $9.8 million annually. The measure maintained the current tax rate without any increase and required independent annual audits with all funds staying local.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.386677", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.805494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.368584", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to maintain 911 emergency response services by retaining firefighters/ police officers/ paramedics; addressing homelessness; fixing potholes/streets; maintaining storm drains, parks, after-school programs, senior services, and other general fund services, by continuing the voter approved one-half cent sales tax, generating approximately 9.8 million dollars annually, until March 31, 2033, requiring independent annual audits, all funds used locally, with no tax rate increase, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2926, "fingerprint": "2020|202000195|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000195|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "99c93935721c8284", "measure_id": "202000195", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 732 of the City Council of the City of Commerce Approving and Adopting Development Agreement No. 18-033 between the City of Commerce and Citadel Holdings Group, LLC and Wash-Tel Commerce, LLC for the development of a ten acre parcel at the corner of Washington Boulevard and Telegraph Road for commercial, public facility and industrial purposes; Making findings consistent with and pursuant to Government Code Section 65867.5; and Making findings of a CEQA Environment Impact Report be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1161, "no_votes": 588, "total_votes": 1749, "percent_yes": 66.38078902229846, "percent_no": 33.61921097770154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would approve a development agreement between the City of...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would approve a development agreement between the City of Commerce and two companies to develop a ten-acre commercial, public facility, and industrial project at the corner of Washington Boulevard and Telegraph Road. The measure passed with 66.4% of the vote.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-06-02", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.795723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.362581", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 732 of the City Council of the City of Commerce Approving and Adopting Development Agreement No. 18-033 between the City of Commerce and Citadel Holdings Group, LLC and Wash-Tel Commerce, LLC for the development of a ten acre parcel at the corner of Washington Boulevard and Telegraph Road for commercial, public facility and industrial purposes; Making findings consistent with and pursuant to Government Code Section 65867.5; and Making findings of a CEQA Environment Impact Report be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2928, "fingerprint": "2020|202000208|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000208|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "588bf7ee3814f59b", "measure_id": "202000208", "measure_letter": "CO", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 738 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 715 between the City of Commerce and Commerce Concentrates, LLC for the change of membership and ownership of Commerce Concentrates, LLC, the addition of cultivation and non-storefront retail delivery as license types, and the relocation of a previously approved commercial cannabis business to 2700 Yates be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2069, "no_votes": 2561, "total_votes": 4630, "percent_yes": 44.68682505399568, "percent_no": 55.31317494600432, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would have approved an amendment to a development agreement wi...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would have approved an amendment to a development agreement with Commerce Concentrates, LLC to allow changes in company ownership, add cultivation and delivery licensing, and relocate a cannabis business to 2700 Yates in Commerce, California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.796388", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.362959", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 738 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 715 between the City of Commerce and Commerce Concentrates, LLC for the change of membership and ownership of Commerce Concentrates, LLC, the addition of cultivation and non-storefront retail delivery as license types, and the relocation of a previously approved commercial cannabis business to 2700 Yates be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2955, "fingerprint": "2020|202000167|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000167|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a99a8058707120f9", "measure_id": "202000167", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to maintain general City services such as 911 emergency response times, sheriff's neighborhood and school patrols; prevent thefts and burglaries; prepare for future wildfires and mud flows; protect local drinking water sources; repair streets and potholes; address homelessness; maintain senior, youth and afterschool programs; approving an ordinance establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $2,600,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring independent audits and all funds benefiting Duarte residents, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2800, "no_votes": 2305, "total_votes": 5105, "percent_yes": 54.84818805093046, "percent_no": 45.15181194906954, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75-cent sales tax in Duarte, California, generating approximately $2.6 million annually to fund general city services including emergency response, law enforcement patrols, infrastructure repairs, homelessness programs, and various community services. The tax requires independent audits and continues until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.805787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.368769", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to maintain general City services such as 911 emergency response times, sheriff's neighborhood and school patrols; prevent thefts and burglaries; prepare for future wildfires and mud flows; protect local drinking water sources; repair streets and potholes; address homelessness; maintain senior, youth and afterschool programs; approving an ordinance establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $2,600,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring independent audits and all funds benefiting Duarte residents, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2972, "fingerprint": "2020|202000216|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000216|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dd800838a37ad4d6", "measure_id": "202000216", "measure_letter": "DB", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance to increase the Transactions and Use Tax by \u00be cents providing approximately $3,800,000 annually, with no expiration date to be used for essential city services such as street maintenance and public safety and other city services such as parks and recreation facilities and programs be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8272, "no_votes": 16606, "total_votes": 24878, "percent_yes": 33.25026127502211, "percent_no": 66.74973872497789, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased the sales tax by 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased the sales tax by 0.75 cents to generate approximately $3.8 million annually for city services including street maintenance, public safety, parks, and recreation programs. The tax increase would have been permanent with no expiration date.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.813854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.373281", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance to increase the Transactions and Use Tax by \u00be cents providing approximately $3,800,000 annually, with no expiration date to be used for essential city services such as street maintenance and public safety and other city services such as parks and recreation facilities and programs be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11111, "fingerprint": "2020|202000240|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000240|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b9641240a3858e2f", "measure_id": "202000240", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain West Hollywood services and prepare for and recover from public health emergencies, address homelessness, help retain local businesses/jobs, support senior and health-related services, keep public areas clean and safe, repair potholes/streets, maintain community safety, and provide other City services, shall a measure be adopted establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $11,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public disclosure of spending, independent financial audits and all funds being used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14852, "no_votes": 5607, "total_votes": 20459, "percent_yes": 72.5939684246542, "percent_no": 27.406031575345807, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in West Hollywood to generate approximately $11 million annually for city services including public health emergency response, homelessness programs, business support, senior services, street maintenance, and public safety. The tax requires public disclosure of spending and independent audits, with all funds designated for local use until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.394967", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.818333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.375894", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain West Hollywood services and prepare for and recover from public health emergencies, address homelessness, help retain local businesses/jobs, support senior and health-related services, keep public areas clean and safe, repair potholes/streets, maintain community safety, and provide other City services, shall a measure be adopted establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $11,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public disclosure of spending, independent financial audits and all funds being used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2921, "fingerprint": "2020|202000159|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000159|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "412286741f5c3d6b", "measure_id": "202000159", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Avalon expand its current commercial cannabis ordinance from medical delivery only to allow for adult use/recreational delivery sales within the City of Avalon city limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 435, "no_votes": 612, "total_votes": 1047, "percent_yes": 41.54727793696275, "percent_no": 58.45272206303725, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have expanded Avalon's cannabis ordinance to allow recreati...", "summary_text": "The measure would have expanded Avalon's cannabis ordinance to allow recreational marijuana delivery sales within city limits, in addition to the existing medical marijuana delivery services. This was an advisory measure seeking voter input on whether the city should permit adult-use cannabis delivery operations.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.794305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.361666", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Avalon expand its current commercial cannabis ordinance from medical delivery only to allow for adult use/recreational delivery sales within the City of Avalon city limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2985, "fingerprint": "2020|202000525|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000525|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "89245d1f28598af5", "measure_id": "202000525", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue critical renovation and modernization at District schools; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make safety and security improvements, and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall Lawndale Elementary School District issue $33,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating an average $2,200,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4431, "no_votes": 2849, "total_votes": 7280, "percent_yes": 60.86538461538461, "percent_no": 39.13461538461539, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Lawndale Elementary School District to issue $33", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Lawndale Elementary School District to issue $33.8 million in bonds to renovate and modernize school facilities, including classrooms, restrooms, safety improvements, and replacing temporary buildings with permanent structures. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.822294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.378355", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue critical renovation and modernization at District schools; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make safety and security improvements, and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall Lawndale Elementary School District issue $33,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating an average $2,200,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2979, "fingerprint": "2020|202000238|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000238|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0d2fa956512e5f04", "measure_id": "202000238", "measure_letter": "ES", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect South El Monte's long term financial stability; maintain 911 emergency response/neighborhood patrols, gang prevention; help prevent thefts/burglaries; maintain streets; improve safe routes to school; keep public areas/parks safe/clean; maintain afterschool programs, youth/senior services, other general services, shall the measure establishing a 1/4\u00a2 sales tax generating approximately $1,000,000 annually until ended by the voters, subject to independent financial audits, all funds benefiting South El Monte residents, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3904, "no_votes": 1602, "total_votes": 5506, "percent_yes": 70.90446785325099, "percent_no": 29.095532146749008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.25% sales tax in South El Monte, California, generating approximately $1 million annually to fund police services, street maintenance, parks, youth and senior programs, and other general city services. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters and is subject to independent financial audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.817788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.375529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect South El Monte's long term financial stability; maintain 911 emergency response/neighborhood patrols, gang prevention; help prevent thefts/burglaries; maintain streets; improve safe routes to school; keep public areas/parks safe/clean; maintain afterschool programs, youth/senior services, other general services, shall the measure establishing a 1/4\u00a2 sales tax generating approximately $1,000,000 annually until ended by the voters, subject to independent financial audits, all funds benefiting South El Monte residents, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2922, "fingerprint": "2020|202000160|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000160|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0e9ea704c19321a2", "measure_id": "202000160", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Avalon expand its current commercial cannabis ordinance to allow for a cannabis business storefront location or dispensary within the City of Avalon city limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 365, "no_votes": 682, "total_votes": 1047, "percent_yes": 34.86150907354345, "percent_no": 65.13849092645654, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked whether the City of Avalon should expand its exis...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked whether the City of Avalon should expand its existing commercial cannabis ordinance to permit cannabis dispensaries or storefront businesses within city limits. The measure failed with 34.9% of voters supporting the expansion.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.794613", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.361851", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Avalon expand its current commercial cannabis ordinance to allow for a cannabis business storefront location or dispensary within the City of Avalon city limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11098, "fingerprint": "2020|202000170|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000170|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c5fa497000c0e9a5", "measure_id": "202000170", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide the City of Gardena with funding available to retain experienced police officers/firefighters/ paramedics; maintain 911 emergency response times, gang/drug prevention programs, emergency communications, neighborhood police patrols, youth/senior services, parks/recreation centers; repair streets/sidewalks, and provide general fund services shall the ordinance establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax be adopted, providing approximately $7,400,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring annual audits, all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7248, "no_votes": 4025, "total_votes": 11273, "percent_yes": 64.29521866406458, "percent_no": 35.70478133593542, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75-cent sales tax in Gardena, California to fund public safety services, infrastructure repairs, and general city services, generating approximately $7.4 million annually. The tax continues indefinitely until voters choose to end it and requires annual audits with all funds remaining under local control.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.387233", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.806326", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.369137", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the City of Gardena with funding available to retain experienced police officers/firefighters/ paramedics; maintain 911 emergency response times, gang/drug prevention programs, emergency communications, neighborhood police patrols, youth/senior services, parks/recreation centers; repair streets/sidewalks, and provide general fund services shall the ordinance establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax be adopted, providing approximately $7,400,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring annual audits, all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2920, "fingerprint": "2020|202000197|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000197|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dabe0857bbeda9d6", "measure_id": "202000197", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that proposes to amend the Alhambra City Charter to remove all reference to the Alhambra Unified School District (\"AUSD\") from the Charter so that AUSD elections may be conducted consistent with the requirements of the State Education Code and State Elections Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18568, "no_votes": 8283, "total_votes": 26851, "percent_yes": 69.1519868906186, "percent_no": 30.848013109381398, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Alhambra City Charter to remove all references to th...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Alhambra City Charter to remove all references to the Alhambra Unified School District, allowing the district's elections to be conducted according to state education and election codes rather than city charter requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.794008", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.361477", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that proposes to amend the Alhambra City Charter to remove all reference to the Alhambra Unified School District (\"AUSD\") from the Charter so that AUSD elections may be conducted consistent with the requirements of the State Education Code and State Elections Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2962, "fingerprint": "2020|202000178|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000178|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7f3c018d7ed126b6", "measure_id": "202000178", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposition imposing a general three-quarter cent transactions and use tax (sales tax) raising approximately $4,000,000 each year to pay for general municipal services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3128, "no_votes": 6959, "total_votes": 10087, "percent_yes": 31.01021116288291, "percent_no": 68.98978883711709, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a 0.75% sales tax in Los Angeles to generate approximately $4 million annually for general municipal services. The measure failed with 31% voter approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.808946", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.370634", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposition imposing a general three-quarter cent transactions and use tax (sales tax) raising approximately $4,000,000 each year to pay for general municipal services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11100, "fingerprint": "2020|202000176|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000176|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0df01d5f987258d4", "measure_id": "202000176", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain Montebello's long-term financial stability and public safety, including police/fire/911 emergency response; protect local drinking water sources; repair streets/potholes; keep public areas safe/clean; provide gang prevention, youth/afterschool, senior, other general services; shall an ordinance establishing a \u00be percent sales tax providing approximately $6,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted; requiring independent audits, public disclosure of spending, all funds benefitting Montebello residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6499, "no_votes": 4220, "total_votes": 10719, "percent_yes": 60.63065584476164, "percent_no": 39.36934415523836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in Montebello to generate approximately $6 million annually for public safety, infrastructure repairs, water protection, and various community services. The tax includes requirements for independent audits and public disclosure of spending, and continues until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.388355", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.808376", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.370256", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain Montebello's long-term financial stability and public safety, including police/fire/911 emergency response; protect local drinking water sources; repair streets/potholes; keep public areas safe/clean; provide gang prevention, youth/afterschool, senior, other general services; shall an ordinance establishing a \u00be percent sales tax providing approximately $6,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted; requiring independent audits, public disclosure of spending, all funds benefitting Montebello residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2944, "fingerprint": "2020|202000200|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000200|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f9985a7e347347eb", "measure_id": "202000200", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For the sole purpose of improving or replacing the Catalina Island Medical Center and related administration/financing costs, shall a measure be adopted imposing a maximum $2.00 special tax per passenger arriving to or departing from the City by cruise ship, ferry or aircraft; and imposing a $1.00 special tax per vessel per day renting moorings within the City, generating approximately $1,200,000.00 annually, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1000, "no_votes": 416, "total_votes": 1416, "percent_yes": 70.62146892655367, "percent_no": 29.378531073446325, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a $2", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a $2.00 special tax per passenger arriving or departing by cruise ship, ferry, or aircraft, plus a $1.00 daily tax per vessel renting moorings, to fund improvements or replacement of the Catalina Island Medical Center. The tax was estimated to generate approximately $1.2 million annually and would continue until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.801898", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.366363", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the sole purpose of improving or replacing the Catalina Island Medical Center and related administration/financing costs, shall a measure be adopted imposing a maximum $2.00 special tax per passenger arriving to or departing from the City by cruise ship, ferry or aircraft; and imposing a $1.00 special tax per vessel per day renting moorings within the City, generating approximately $1,200,000.00 annually, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2957, "fingerprint": "2020|202000171|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000171|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0a49dcadaf2595e5", "measure_id": "202000171", "measure_letter": "HG", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To keep local sales tax dollars in Hawaiian Gardens to maintain public safety; fix potholes/streets; maintain senior services; after school programs; improve City parks; and provide the ability to provide City services in the event other revenue sources disappear, shall the measure authorizing a three-quarters-cent sales tax generating approximately $550,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring independent annual audits, and all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1008, "no_votes": 652, "total_votes": 1660, "percent_yes": 60.722891566265055, "percent_no": 39.277108433734945, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized a 0", "summary_text": "This measure authorized a 0.75-cent sales tax in Hawaiian Gardens to fund local services including public safety, street repairs, senior services, after-school programs, and park improvements, generating approximately $550,000 annually. The tax requires independent annual audits and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.806734", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.369327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep local sales tax dollars in Hawaiian Gardens to maintain public safety; fix potholes/streets; maintain senior services; after school programs; improve City parks; and provide the ability to provide City services in the event other revenue sources disappear, shall the measure authorizing a three-quarters-cent sales tax generating approximately $550,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring independent annual audits, and all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2961, "fingerprint": "2020|202000177|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000177|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "00d4194e9b58f661", "measure_id": "202000177", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Advisory Proposition advising the City of Monterey Park regarding expenditure of revenue resulting from a 3/4 sales tax increase be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3814, "no_votes": 6031, "total_votes": 9845, "percent_yes": 38.74047739969528, "percent_no": 61.25952260030472, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure would have expressed voter opinion on how the City of M...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure would have expressed voter opinion on how the City of Monterey Park should spend revenue from a proposed 0.75% sales tax increase. The measure was non-binding and would not have implemented any actual tax or spending changes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.808645", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.370450", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Advisory Proposition advising the City of Monterey Park regarding expenditure of revenue resulting from a 3/4 sales tax increase be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2948, "fingerprint": "2020|202000217|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000217|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8ff41af78b50a8f0", "measure_id": "202000217", "measure_letter": "HN", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To remove impediments to federal and state housing funding for the City of El Monte without increasing local taxes, shall affordable, decent, and safe rental housing projects be constructed, developed, acquired, or converted by low-income housing providers, as designated by the City of El Monte, for low-income persons, including families, the elderly, and veterans, as applicable, for up to 500 units annually for 17 years, with an annual carryover for unused units?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17989, "no_votes": 7971, "total_votes": 25960, "percent_yes": 69.29506933744221, "percent_no": 30.704930662557786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes low-income housing providers designated by El Monte t...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes low-income housing providers designated by El Monte to construct, develop, acquire, or convert up to 500 affordable rental housing units annually for 17 years, with unused units carrying over to subsequent years. The measure aims to remove barriers to receiving federal and state housing funding without raising local taxes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.803074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.367096", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To remove impediments to federal and state housing funding for the City of El Monte without increasing local taxes, shall affordable, decent, and safe rental housing projects be constructed, developed, acquired, or converted by low-income housing providers, as designated by the City of El Monte, for low-income persons, including families, the elderly, and veterans, as applicable, for up to 500 units annually for 17 years, with an annual carryover for unused units?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11125, "fingerprint": "2020|202000537|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000537|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "71e9066e21db53f7", "measure_id": "202000537", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade classrooms, including instructional technology, vocational/career education, roofs, plumbing, security/fire safety, remove asbestos, lead paint, mold; provide safe drinking water; acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment; shall Inglewood Unified School District's measure authorizing $240,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation raising on average $15,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring oversight, and all funds invested in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37639, "no_votes": 8945, "total_votes": 46584, "percent_yes": 80.79812811265671, "percent_no": 19.201871887343287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Inglewood Unified School District to issue $240 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Inglewood Unified School District to issue $240 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, technology, safety systems, and infrastructure improvements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $15 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.400661", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.826104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.380538", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade classrooms, including instructional technology, vocational/career education, roofs, plumbing, security/fire safety, remove asbestos, lead paint, mold; provide safe drinking water; acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment; shall Inglewood Unified School District's measure authorizing $240,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation raising on average $15,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring oversight, and all funds invested in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2984, "fingerprint": "2020|202000520|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000520|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1b223da479cf575d", "measure_id": "202000520", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high-quality Burbank schools by retaining excellent teachers; protecting small class sizes; and maintain/expand career/college courses, art, music, science, innovative programs, safety and wellness support, shall this Burbank Unified School District measure to levy $0.10 per square foot of improved property per parcel annually, exempting seniors/certain disability recipients, providing approximately $9,100,000 in annual local funding for 12 years and requiring independent oversight/audits, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20318, "no_votes": 11367, "total_votes": 31685, "percent_yes": 64.12498027457788, "percent_no": 35.87501972542212, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Burbank Unified School District to lev...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Burbank Unified School District to levy a property tax of $0.10 per square foot of improved property annually for 12 years, generating approximately $9.1 million per year for school programs and services. The tax would have exempted seniors and certain disability recipients and included independent oversight and audit requirements.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.820926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.377434", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high-quality Burbank schools by retaining excellent teachers; protecting small class sizes; and maintain/expand career/college courses, art, music, science, innovative programs, safety and wellness support, shall this Burbank Unified School District measure to levy $0.10 per square foot of improved property per parcel annually, exempting seniors/certain disability recipients, providing approximately $9,100,000 in annual local funding for 12 years and requiring independent oversight/audits, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2923, "fingerprint": "2020|202000179|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000179|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "483e5ad389134acd", "measure_id": "202000179", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Monterey Park 2040 Land Use and Urban Design Element Proposition be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4579, "no_votes": 4737, "total_votes": 9316, "percent_yes": 49.15199656504938, "percent_no": 50.84800343495062, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have adopted the Monterey Park 2040 Land Use and Ur...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have adopted the Monterey Park 2040 Land Use and Urban Design Element, which appears to be a long-term planning document that would guide future development and urban design decisions in the city through 2040.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.794882", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.362035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Monterey Park 2040 Land Use and Urban Design Element Proposition be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11094, "fingerprint": "2020|202000185|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000185|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8ed83f12dfe62ccf", "measure_id": "202000185", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to make the office of City Treasurer appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13691, "no_votes": 22965, "total_votes": 36656, "percent_yes": 37.34995635093845, "percent_no": 62.65004364906155, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the Los Angeles City Treasurer from an electe...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the Los Angeles City Treasurer from an elected position to one appointed by the mayor or city council. The charter amendment failed, so the City Treasurer remains an elected office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.382342", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.799216", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.364668", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to make the office of City Treasurer appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2918, "fingerprint": "2020|202000026|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000026|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "05073c1e2def9788", "measure_id": "202000026", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure, annually allocating in the County's budget no less than ten percent (10%) of the County's locally generated unrestricted revenues in the general fund to address the disproportionate impact of racial injustice through community investment and alternatives to incarceration and prohibiting using those funds for carceral systems and law enforcement agencies as detailed in the ordinance adopting the proposed charter amendment, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2159690, "no_votes": 1621198, "total_votes": 3780888, "percent_yes": 57.12123712736267, "percent_no": 42.87876287263733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure requires Los Angeles County to annually allocate at least 10% of...", "summary_text": "This measure requires Los Angeles County to annually allocate at least 10% of its locally generated unrestricted general fund revenues to address racial injustice through community investment and alternatives to incarceration. The allocated funds cannot be used for carceral systems or law enforcement agencies.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.793467", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.361112", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, annually allocating in the County's budget no less than ten percent (10%) of the County's locally generated unrestricted revenues in the general fund to address the disproportionate impact of racial injustice through community investment and alternatives to incarceration and prohibiting using those funds for carceral systems and law enforcement agencies as detailed in the ordinance adopting the proposed charter amendment, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2933, "fingerprint": "2020|202000226|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000226|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c49a613e04e370da", "measure_id": "202000226", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Revised Monterey Park 2040 Land Use Element Proposition be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9021, "no_votes": 8326, "total_votes": 17347, "percent_yes": 52.00322822390039, "percent_no": 47.99677177609961, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure adopted the Revised Monterey Park 2040 Land Use Element, ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure adopted the Revised Monterey Park 2040 Land Use Element, which updates the city's long-term land use planning document that guides development and zoning decisions through 2040.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.798017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.363878", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Revised Monterey Park 2040 Land Use Element Proposition be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11115, "fingerprint": "2020|202000521|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000521|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e27f8665caa2dd7c", "measure_id": "202000521", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade, construct and equip high school classrooms, science labs, sites and career-training facilities serving Fullerton, Buena Park, and La Habra supporting college/career readiness in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades, improve campus safety/security, and upgrade roofs/plumbing/electrical, shall the Fullerton Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value (averaging $20,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2105, "no_votes": 3302, "total_votes": 5407, "percent_yes": 38.93101535047161, "percent_no": 61.06898464952839, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Fullerton Joint Union High School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Fullerton Joint Union High School District to issue $310 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, science labs, career training facilities, and infrastructure at high schools serving Fullerton, Buena Park, and La Habra. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $20 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.396839", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.821197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.377621", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade, construct and equip high school classrooms, science labs, sites and career-training facilities serving Fullerton, Buena Park, and La Habra supporting college/career readiness in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades, improve campus safety/security, and upgrade roofs/plumbing/electrical, shall the Fullerton Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value (averaging $20,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2969, "fingerprint": "2020|202000206|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000206|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8097665495f127fd", "measure_id": "202000206", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City services, such as public safety, natural disaster/public health emergency preparedness; 9-1-1 emergency response, protect local drinking water/environment; assist local small businesses/retain jobs; repair streets/potholes; and other general City services, shall the measure establishing a \u00be-cent general transaction and use (sales) tax providing Carson approximately $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, all funds for Carson, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22018, "no_votes": 18819, "total_votes": 40837, "percent_yes": 53.91679114528492, "percent_no": 46.08320885471508, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75-cent sales tax in Carson, California to generate approximately $12 million annually for general city services including public safety, emergency response, infrastructure repairs, and other municipal operations. The tax continues until voters decide to end it and requires public disclosure of how the funds are spent.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.812541", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.372720", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City services, such as public safety, natural disaster/public health emergency preparedness; 9-1-1 emergency response, protect local drinking water/environment; assist local small businesses/retain jobs; repair streets/potholes; and other general City services, shall the measure establishing a \u00be-cent general transaction and use (sales) tax providing Carson approximately $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, all funds for Carson, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11105, "fingerprint": "2020|202000222|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000222|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "06c7e4c790a23141", "measure_id": "202000222", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect Lomita's long-term financial stability; maintain City services; improve local drinking water quality; repair streets/potholes; keep parks and public areas clean/safe; maintain emergency/public safety response; help retain local businesses; and provide other City services, shall a measure be adopted establishing a \u00be cent local sales tax providing approximately $1,300,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring annual independent financial audits with all funds benefitting Lomita residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5510, "no_votes": 3589, "total_votes": 9099, "percent_yes": 60.55610506649083, "percent_no": 39.44389493350917, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% local sales tax in Lomita, California, generating approximately $1.3 million annually for general city services including street repairs, public safety, parks maintenance, and water quality improvements. The tax continues until voters decide to end it and requires annual independent financial audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.392730", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.814712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.373851", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect Lomita's long-term financial stability; maintain City services; improve local drinking water quality; repair streets/potholes; keep parks and public areas clean/safe; maintain emergency/public safety response; help retain local businesses; and provide other City services, shall a measure be adopted establishing a \u00be cent local sales tax providing approximately $1,300,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring annual independent financial audits with all funds benefitting Lomita residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2959, "fingerprint": "2020|202000173|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000173|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9bced1ede1421512", "measure_id": "202000173", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect City of Lakewood's financial stability; maintain 911 emergency response/sheriff patrols; prevent property crimes, thefts, burglaries; protect local drinking water; maintain streets; repair potholes; keep public areas/parks safe/clean; address homelessness; maintain senior/disabled resident/youth/gang prevention programs/other general services, shall an ordinance establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $10,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted; requiring citizens' oversight, audits, all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13822, "no_votes": 7657, "total_votes": 21479, "percent_yes": 64.35122677964523, "percent_no": 35.64877322035477, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75-cent sales tax in Lakewood, California to generate approximately $10 million annually for general city services including public safety, street maintenance, parks, and social programs. The tax includes citizen oversight and audit requirements and remains in effect until terminated by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.807389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.369695", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect City of Lakewood's financial stability; maintain 911 emergency response/sheriff patrols; prevent property crimes, thefts, burglaries; protect local drinking water; maintain streets; repair potholes; keep public areas/parks safe/clean; address homelessness; maintain senior/disabled resident/youth/gang prevention programs/other general services, shall an ordinance establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $10,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted; requiring citizens' oversight, audits, all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11117, "fingerprint": "2020|202000523|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000523|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "55f8785b7452e85c", "measure_id": "202000523", "measure_letter": "LC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education in La Ca\u00f1ada schools, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, maintain manageable class sizes, and continue funding academic programs including advanced subjects, math, science, technology, engineering, arts, and robotics, shall La Ca\u00f1ada Unified School District's measure renewing the expiring school parcel tax at the current rate of $450 per parcel be adopted, continuing $2,500,000 in annual school funding until ended by voters, with annual inflation adjustments, senior exemptions, independent oversight, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5025, "no_votes": 2086, "total_votes": 7111, "percent_yes": 70.6651666432288, "percent_no": 29.3348333567712, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed La Ca\u00f1ada Unified School District's expiring parcel tax ...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed La Ca\u00f1ada Unified School District's expiring parcel tax at $450 per parcel, continuing $2.5 million in annual school funding with annual inflation adjustments, senior exemptions, and independent oversight until ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.397403", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.821742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.377984", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education in La Ca\u00f1ada schools, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, maintain manageable class sizes, and continue funding academic programs including advanced subjects, math, science, technology, engineering, arts, and robotics, shall La Ca\u00f1ada Unified School District's measure renewing the expiring school parcel tax at the current rate of $450 per parcel be adopted, continuing $2,500,000 in annual school funding until ended by voters, with annual inflation adjustments, senior exemptions, independent oversight, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2974, "fingerprint": "2020|202000221|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000221|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d93c4d1eafbed4a5", "measure_id": "202000221", "measure_letter": "LC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance protecting Lancaster's long-term financial stability; maintaining essential city services; repairing streets/potholes; addressing homelessness; maintaining 911 emergency response; keeping public areas safe/clean for all; retaining local businesses; protecting local water sources; maintaining veterans, senior, mental health, community programs; by establishing a \u00be-cent sales tax, providing approximately $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring citizen oversight, public spending disclosures; all funds used locally in Lancaster, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32445, "no_votes": 26695, "total_votes": 59140, "percent_yes": 54.86134595874197, "percent_no": 45.13865404125803, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75-cent sales tax in Lancaster to generate approximately $12 million annually for city services including street repairs, homelessness programs, emergency response, and community services. The measure included requirements for citizen oversight and public spending disclosures, with funds restricted to local use in Lancaster.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.814427", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.373661", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance protecting Lancaster's long-term financial stability; maintaining essential city services; repairing streets/potholes; addressing homelessness; maintaining 911 emergency response; keeping public areas safe/clean for all; retaining local businesses; protecting local water sources; maintaining veterans, senior, mental health, community programs; by establishing a \u00be-cent sales tax, providing approximately $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring citizen oversight, public spending disclosures; all funds used locally in Lancaster, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2976, "fingerprint": "2020|202000224|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000224|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9fcdbb8d607ba573", "measure_id": "202000224", "measure_letter": "LH", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect, maintain and enhance vital public safety services, infrastructure needs including streets, utility maintenance, park and recreation services including programs for youth and seniors, and other essential services, shall the City of Lynwood impose a three percent (3%) privilege tax on the gross receipts of for-profit hospitals operating within the City of Lynwood? All funds to be deposited in Lynwood general fund.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8549, "no_votes": 9953, "total_votes": 18502, "percent_yes": 46.20581558750405, "percent_no": 53.79418441249595, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a 3% tax on the gross receipts of for-profit h...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a 3% tax on the gross receipts of for-profit hospitals operating in Lynwood, with revenues going to the city's general fund to support public safety, infrastructure, parks, and other city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.815458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.374236", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect, maintain and enhance vital public safety services, infrastructure needs including streets, utility maintenance, park and recreation services including programs for youth and seniors, and other essential services, shall the City of Lynwood impose a three percent (3%) privilege tax on the gross receipts of for-profit hospitals operating within the City of Lynwood? All funds to be deposited in Lynwood general fund.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2941, "fingerprint": "2020|202000219|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000219|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0586c1dbaa48392a", "measure_id": "202000219", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance limiting the number of future full consecutive four-year terms that may be served by an individual as Mayor of Hawthorne and as Member of the Hawthorne City Council to two terms in each office be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22041, "no_votes": 7344, "total_votes": 29385, "percent_yes": 75.00765696784073, "percent_no": 24.99234303215927, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance limits future mayors and city council members in Hawthorne to s...", "summary_text": "The ordinance limits future mayors and city council members in Hawthorne to serving no more than two consecutive four-year terms in each respective office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.800980", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.365821", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance limiting the number of future full consecutive four-year terms that may be served by an individual as Mayor of Hawthorne and as Member of the Hawthorne City Council to two terms in each office be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2958, "fingerprint": "2020|202000172|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000172|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3c2758acba87f01d", "measure_id": "202000172", "measure_letter": "LV", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain funding for general city services in La Verne, including: 9-1-1 emergency response, fire protection, paramedics, police patrols, gang, drug and crime prevention, street maintenance, pothole repair and removing graffiti, shall an ordinance establishing a 0.75% local sales tax until ended by the voters be adopted, providing approximately $3.1 million annually to be spent only in La Verne, that cannot be taken by the County or State, requiring citizen oversight/annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5664, "no_votes": 4755, "total_votes": 10419, "percent_yes": 54.36222286207889, "percent_no": 45.63777713792111, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% local sales tax in La Verne to fund general city services including emergency response, public safety, and infrastructure maintenance, generating approximately $3.1 million annually. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters and includes provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.807035", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.369509", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain funding for general city services in La Verne, including: 9-1-1 emergency response, fire protection, paramedics, police patrols, gang, drug and crime prevention, street maintenance, pothole repair and removing graffiti, shall an ordinance establishing a 0.75% local sales tax until ended by the voters be adopted, providing approximately $3.1 million annually to be spent only in La Verne, that cannot be taken by the County or State, requiring citizen oversight/annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11119, "fingerprint": "2020|202000527|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000527|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8f0cfc9ddfba36ff", "measure_id": "202000527", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; shall Mountain View School District's measure be adopted authorizing $56,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2.9 million annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3202, "no_votes": 1407, "total_votes": 4609, "percent_yes": 69.4727706660881, "percent_no": 30.527229333911905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Mountain View School District to issue $56 million...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Mountain View School District to issue $56 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including classroom modernization, safety upgrades, accessibility improvements, and HVAC system replacements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 4.5 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $2.9 million annually until paid off.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.398218", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.822854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.378716", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; shall Mountain View School District's measure be adopted authorizing $56,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2.9 million annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2968, "fingerprint": "2020|202000202|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000202|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f33cd014c06942b8", "measure_id": "202000202", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the \"Ordinance to maintain Bellflower's long term financial stability; fund emergency and safety responses; keep public areas clean/safe; ensure the supply of clean drinking water; retain local businesses; address homelessness; repair streets; maintain afterschool/youth, disabled/Senior Programs; and fund other General Municipal Services by establishing a \u00be cent transactions and use (sales) tax, raising approximately $4,500,000 annually to maintain Bellflower's General Municipal Services, with audits and public disclosure of spending,\" effective unless voter terminated be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18251, "no_votes": 9115, "total_votes": 27366, "percent_yes": 66.69224585251771, "percent_no": 33.307754147482285, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75 cent sales tax in Bellflower to raise approximately $4.5 million annually for general municipal services including emergency response, street repairs, public safety, water supply, youth and senior programs, and homelessness services. The tax includes provisions for audits and public disclosure of spending and can be terminated by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.811976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.372532", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \"Ordinance to maintain Bellflower's long term financial stability; fund emergency and safety responses; keep public areas clean/safe; ensure the supply of clean drinking water; retain local businesses; address homelessness; repair streets; maintain afterschool/youth, disabled/Senior Programs; and fund other General Municipal Services by establishing a \u00be cent transactions and use (sales) tax, raising approximately $4,500,000 annually to maintain Bellflower's General Municipal Services, with audits and public disclosure of spending,\" effective unless voter terminated be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2924, "fingerprint": "2020|202000183|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000183|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9c2088c507b68311", "measure_id": "202000183", "measure_letter": "MJ", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City ban marijuana storefront dispensaries and all other cannabis business activities in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2000, "no_votes": 1674, "total_votes": 3674, "percent_yes": 54.43658138268916, "percent_no": 45.56341861731084, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would ban all marijuana storefront dispensaries and canna...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would ban all marijuana storefront dispensaries and cannabis business activities within Los Angeles city limits. The measure passed with 54.4% of voters supporting the ban.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.795148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.362216", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City ban marijuana storefront dispensaries and all other cannabis business activities in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11124, "fingerprint": "2020|202000536|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000536|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "de87dc26b3dfeaf0", "measure_id": "202000536", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted adding Section 9115 to the District's Bylaws to limit elected Board of Education service to two consecutive four-year terms with the ability to again serve as a member of the Board of Education after being off the Board for no less than four (4) years, applying said limits to newly elected, seated or appointed terms at the November 3, 2020 Election and at future elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15669, "no_votes": 7529, "total_votes": 23198, "percent_yes": 67.5446159151651, "percent_no": 32.455384084834904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adds term limits to the Los Angeles school board, restricting me...", "summary_text": "This measure adds term limits to the Los Angeles school board, restricting members to two consecutive four-year terms before requiring at least four years off the board. The limits apply to terms beginning with the November 2020 election and future elections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.400464", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.825830", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.380358", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted adding Section 9115 to the District's Bylaws to limit elected Board of Education service to two consecutive four-year terms with the ability to again serve as a member of the Board of Education after being off the Board for no less than four (4) years, applying said limits to newly elected, seated or appointed terms at the November 3, 2020 Election and at future elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2945, "fingerprint": "2020|202000164|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000164|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "131c60c3adf57590", "measure_id": "202000164", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Ordinance No. 2020-380 amending the Calabasas General Plan and Municipal Code and adopting a new Specific Plan allowing up to 161 new market-rate apartment units, within an existing 600-unit apartment complex at 3831 North Orchid Lane, Calabasas, CA, requiring at least ten percent of the complex's units be reserved for fifty-five years as deed-restricted affordable units, designating 60 units for moderate income households and 20 units for very-low income households, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1749, "no_votes": 6209, "total_votes": 7958, "percent_yes": 21.977883890424728, "percent_no": 78.02211610957528, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended Calabasas's General Plan and Municipal Code to...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended Calabasas's General Plan and Municipal Code to allow up to 161 new market-rate apartment units within an existing 600-unit complex. It would have required at least 10% of the total complex units to be reserved as deed-restricted affordable housing for 55 years, with 60 units for moderate-income and 20 units for very-low income households.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.802167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.366548", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Ordinance No. 2020-380 amending the Calabasas General Plan and Municipal Code and adopting a new Specific Plan allowing up to 161 new market-rate apartment units, within an existing 600-unit apartment complex at 3831 North Orchid Lane, Calabasas, CA, requiring at least ten percent of the complex's units be reserved for fifty-five years as deed-restricted affordable units, designating 60 units for moderate income households and 20 units for very-low income households, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11126, "fingerprint": "2020|202000539|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000539|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d5f3cd7b2e6d32cc", "measure_id": "202000539", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade schools, improve equitable access to technology, attract/retain quality teachers by repairing deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms, roofs, science labs; removing hazardous materials; providing safe drinking water; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, shall Pasadena Unified School District's measure authorizing $516,300,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $45/$100,000 assessed value (averaging $28,504,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring annual independent audits/citizens' oversight, all funds only for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65275, "no_votes": 38296, "total_votes": 103571, "percent_yes": 63.02439872164989, "percent_no": 36.97560127835011, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Pasadena Unified School District to issue $516", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Pasadena Unified School District to issue $516.3 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, bathrooms, science labs, and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of $45 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.401059", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.826647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.380907", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade schools, improve equitable access to technology, attract/retain quality teachers by repairing deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms, roofs, science labs; removing hazardous materials; providing safe drinking water; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, shall Pasadena Unified School District's measure authorizing $516,300,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $45/$100,000 assessed value (averaging $28,504,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring annual independent audits/citizens' oversight, all funds only for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2986, "fingerprint": "2020|202000526|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000526|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a1cfe4fbc3b8de71", "measure_id": "202000526", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain consistency and education curriculum for families, students and staff in our local elementary and middle schools with the feeder high school district, and permanently save the District nearly $250,000 annually, shall Lowell Joint School District permanently transfer its current jurisdiction and administrative oversight from Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools to Orange County Superintendent of Schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3533, "no_votes": 1783, "total_votes": 5316, "percent_yes": 66.45974416854779, "percent_no": 33.540255831452214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure transferred the Lowell Joint School District's administrative ov...", "summary_text": "This measure transferred the Lowell Joint School District's administrative oversight from the Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools to the Orange County Superintendent of Schools to align with the district's feeder high school district and reduce costs.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.822575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.378536", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain consistency and education curriculum for families, students and staff in our local elementary and middle schools with the feeder high school district, and permanently save the District nearly $250,000 annually, shall Lowell Joint School District permanently transfer its current jurisdiction and administrative oversight from Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools to Orange County Superintendent of Schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11107, "fingerprint": "2020|202000228|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000228|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6e8439e7030eaa4d", "measure_id": "202000228", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure maintaining 911 response, fire, paramedic, public health, senior and homeless services, street repairs, and other services by amending the City Charter to continue collecting in electric rates and maintain the longstanding transfer, limited to 12% gross revenue, providing $18,000,000 annually to Pasadena's General Fund that does not increase taxes or utility rates until ended by voters, requiring financial audits with all funds locally controlled benefitting Pasadena residents, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55909, "no_votes": 10990, "total_votes": 66899, "percent_yes": 83.57225070628859, "percent_no": 16.427749293711415, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the City Charter to continue transferring up to 12% of th...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the City Charter to continue transferring up to 12% of the electric utility's gross revenue (approximately $18 million annually) to Pasadena's General Fund to maintain various city services. The transfer would continue until voters decide to end it, with required financial audits and no increase to current tax or utility rates.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.393826", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.816547", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.374792", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure maintaining 911 response, fire, paramedic, public health, senior and homeless services, street repairs, and other services by amending the City Charter to continue collecting in electric rates and maintain the longstanding transfer, limited to 12% gross revenue, providing $18,000,000 annually to Pasadena's General Fund that does not increase taxes or utility rates until ended by voters, requiring financial audits with all funds locally controlled benefitting Pasadena residents, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2963, "fingerprint": "2020|202000180|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000180|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c3329dc2c183fbb5", "measure_id": "202000180", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve public safety services and 911 emergency response; repair streets and potholes; help protect local drinking water sources; address homelessness; keep public areas safe and clean; maintain gang prevention, parks, youth afterschool programs, services for seniors, individuals with disabilities and other general services, shall the City of Norwalk adopt an ordinance enacting a \u00be \u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $7,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits with all funds locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9350, "no_votes": 7055, "total_votes": 16405, "percent_yes": 56.994818652849744, "percent_no": 43.005181347150256, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.75-cent sales tax in the City of Norwalk to fund public safety services, street repairs, homelessness programs, parks, and other general city services, generating approximately $7 million annually. The tax requires independent audits and continues until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.809298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.370814", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve public safety services and 911 emergency response; repair streets and potholes; help protect local drinking water sources; address homelessness; keep public areas safe and clean; maintain gang prevention, parks, youth afterschool programs, services for seniors, individuals with disabilities and other general services, shall the City of Norwalk adopt an ordinance enacting a \u00be \u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $7,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits with all funds locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2982, "fingerprint": "2020|202000230|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000230|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1dc2c521f13aab06", "measure_id": "202000230", "measure_letter": "PA", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure be adopted? An initiative measure to enact a three-quarter percent (0.75%) increase in the City's Utility Users Tax for a period of ten years unless extended by the city council, and establish an exemption of the Utility Users Tax for legally handicapped residential rate payers.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6677, "no_votes": 38889, "total_votes": 45566, "percent_yes": 14.653469692314438, "percent_no": 85.34653030768555, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased Los Angeles's Utility Users Tax by 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased Los Angeles's Utility Users Tax by 0.75% for ten years and created an exemption from the tax for legally handicapped residential customers.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.820153", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.377065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure be adopted? An initiative measure to enact a three-quarter percent (0.75%) increase in the City's Utility Users Tax for a period of ten years unless extended by the city council, and establish an exemption of the Utility Users Tax for legally handicapped residential rate payers.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2956, "fingerprint": "2020|202000168|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000168|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d0fcf4a11c6c12c2", "measure_id": "202000168", "measure_letter": "PC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund El Monte public safety, parks, recreation, and youth programs including: after-school programs; youth recreation; addiction prevention; community policing; and park improvements, shall a gross receipts tax be adopted for cannabis businesses up to 9% for retail, up to 6% for cultivation and manufacturing, and up to 5% for distribution and laboratory testing to raise approximately $3,500,000 annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7680, "no_votes": 3064, "total_votes": 10744, "percent_yes": 71.48175725986597, "percent_no": 28.518242740134028, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopted a gross receipts tax on cannabis businesses in El Monte ...", "summary_text": "This measure adopted a gross receipts tax on cannabis businesses in El Monte at rates up to 9% for retail, 6% for cultivation and manufacturing, and 5% for distribution and laboratory testing. The tax is expected to generate approximately $3.5 million annually to fund public safety, parks, recreation, and youth programs.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.806055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.368956", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund El Monte public safety, parks, recreation, and youth programs including: after-school programs; youth recreation; addiction prevention; community policing; and park improvements, shall a gross receipts tax be adopted for cannabis businesses up to 9% for retail, up to 6% for cultivation and manufacturing, and up to 5% for distribution and laboratory testing to raise approximately $3,500,000 annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2934, "fingerprint": "2020|202000231|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000231|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6199eedd9669bc1d", "measure_id": "202000231", "measure_letter": "PM", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure \"Pomona Regulate Cannabis Act of 2018\" be adopted? This measure will amend the Pomona Zoning Code to allow commercial cannabis uses by creating the \"Safe Access Cannabis\" (SAC) and \"Industrial Cannabis\" (IC) overlay zones. It prohibits cannabis businesses within 600 feet of a school, daycare, or youth center.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23824, "no_votes": 22665, "total_votes": 46489, "percent_yes": 51.24653143754436, "percent_no": 48.75346856245564, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Pomona's zoning code to allow commercial cannabis busine...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Pomona's zoning code to allow commercial cannabis businesses by creating two new overlay zones while prohibiting such businesses within 600 feet of schools, daycares, or youth centers.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.798328", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.364087", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure \"Pomona Regulate Cannabis Act of 2018\" be adopted? This measure will amend the Pomona Zoning Code to allow commercial cannabis uses by creating the \"Safe Access Cannabis\" (SAC) and \"Industrial Cannabis\" (IC) overlay zones. It prohibits cannabis businesses within 600 feet of a school, daycare, or youth center.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2935, "fingerprint": "2020|202000232|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000232|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ee1b9ef3d1f5e6fe", "measure_id": "202000232", "measure_letter": "PO", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Commercial Cannabis Businesses and Commercial Cannabis Permit Program Overlay District Ordinances adopted by the City Council be adopted? This measure will adopt and affirm the City's existing four-phase, merit-based Commercial Cannabis Permit Program (Ordinance No.'s 4257/4273), which may result in the award of up to eight commercial cannabis permits. Permits may only be located within the approved overlay, guaranteeing a 1,000-foot buffer from K-12 schools, day care centers, and youth-serving facilities (including City parks). The overlay excludes parcels within Downtown Pomona, east of Reservoir Street, and within 600 feet of neighboring City boundaries.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27016, "no_votes": 18690, "total_votes": 45706, "percent_yes": 59.10821336367217, "percent_no": 40.89178663632783, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopted a four-phase, merit-based program that allows up to eigh...", "summary_text": "This measure adopted a four-phase, merit-based program that allows up to eight commercial cannabis permits within a designated overlay district that maintains 1,000-foot buffers from schools, day care centers, and youth facilities. The overlay district excludes areas in Downtown Pomona, east of Reservoir Street, and within 600 feet of neighboring city boundaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.798681", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.364280", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Commercial Cannabis Businesses and Commercial Cannabis Permit Program Overlay District Ordinances adopted by the City Council be adopted? This measure will adopt and affirm the City's existing four-phase, merit-based Commercial Cannabis Permit Program (Ordinance No.'s 4257/4273), which may result in the award of up to eight commercial cannabis permits. Permits may only be located within the approved overlay, guaranteeing a 1,000-foot buffer from K-12 schools, day care centers, and youth-serving facilities (including City parks). The overlay excludes parcels within Downtown Pomona, east of Reservoir Street, and within 600 feet of neighboring City boundaries.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2987, "fingerprint": "2020|202000528|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000528|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c3adb32fe4338f5f", "measure_id": "202000528", "measure_letter": "PV", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District sites; improve campus safety/security systems; make seismic, roofing, plumbing, electrical, air conditioning, and disabled student access improvements; update/replace bathrooms, classrooms, and science labs that support students for college/career readiness, shall the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District measure authorizing $389,385,000 in bonds, at legal rates, be adopted, levying approximately 3.8 cents per $100 assessed value ($21,042,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a citizens' oversight committee and independent audits on all bond money?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8913, "no_votes": 14439, "total_votes": 23352, "percent_yes": 38.16803699897225, "percent_no": 61.83196300102775, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District to issue $389,385,000 in bonds to fund facility repairs, safety improvements, and infrastructure upgrades including seismic work, accessibility modifications, and classroom updates. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 3.8 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.823371", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.378902", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District sites; improve campus safety/security systems; make seismic, roofing, plumbing, electrical, air conditioning, and disabled student access improvements; update/replace bathrooms, classrooms, and science labs that support students for college/career readiness, shall the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District measure authorizing $389,385,000 in bonds, at legal rates, be adopted, levying approximately 3.8 cents per $100 assessed value ($21,042,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a citizens' oversight committee and independent audits on all bond money?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11103, "fingerprint": "2020|202000199|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000199|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2707f1d9c25afc40", "measure_id": "202000199", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve general City services, such as law enforcement, parks, youth/senior services, and street repair, shall a measure enacting a tax on cannabis or hemp businesses up to $20.00 per square foot for cultivation, and 15% of gross receipts for all other cannabis or hemp businesses, estimated to generate approximately $200,000 - $400,000, annually, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3930, "no_votes": 1904, "total_votes": 5834, "percent_yes": 67.36372985944463, "percent_no": 32.63627014055537, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a tax on cannabis and hemp businesses in Los Angeles, ch...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a tax on cannabis and hemp businesses in Los Angeles, charging up to $20 per square foot for cultivation operations and 15% of gross receipts for other cannabis businesses. The tax was estimated to generate $200,000-$400,000 annually for general city services including law enforcement, parks, youth and senior services, and street repair.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.390258", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.811338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.372165", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve general City services, such as law enforcement, parks, youth/senior services, and street repair, shall a measure enacting a tax on cannabis or hemp businesses up to $20.00 per square foot for cultivation, and 15% of gross receipts for all other cannabis or hemp businesses, estimated to generate approximately $200,000 - $400,000, annually, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2937, "fingerprint": "2020|202000186|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000186|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ffbba551283346a0", "measure_id": "202000186", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to make the office of City Clerk appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13662, "no_votes": 23122, "total_votes": 36784, "percent_yes": 37.141148325358856, "percent_no": 62.858851674641144, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the Los Angeles City Clerk position from an e...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the Los Angeles City Clerk position from an elected office to one appointed by city officials. The charter amendment failed with 37.1% of voters supporting the change.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.799489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.364852", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to make the office of City Clerk appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11109, "fingerprint": "2020|202000237|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000237|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "74afccf1cb87aaa5", "measure_id": "202000237", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure establishing a \u00be (three-quarter) cent sales tax providing an estimated $5,000,000 annually to the City's general fund to maintain city programs such as: street, pothole, and infrastructure repair, clean public areas, 9-1-1 emergency response, crime prevention, and other general services until ended by voters, with independent audits, all money used locally for Signal Hill, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2664, "no_votes": 2510, "total_votes": 5174, "percent_yes": 51.48821028218013, "percent_no": 48.51178971781987, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in Signal Hill, California to generate approximately $5 million annually for the city's general fund to support various municipal services including infrastructure repair, emergency response, and crime prevention. The tax continues until voters choose to end it and includes provisions for independent audits with all revenue staying within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.394397", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.817375", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.375342", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure establishing a \u00be (three-quarter) cent sales tax providing an estimated $5,000,000 annually to the City's general fund to maintain city programs such as: street, pothole, and infrastructure repair, clean public areas, 9-1-1 emergency response, crime prevention, and other general services until ended by voters, with independent audits, all money used locally for Signal Hill, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2917, "fingerprint": "2020|202000024|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000024|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "92570e694928c487", "measure_id": "202000024", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure amending Chapter 3.79 of the Los Angeles County Code to revise the duties and powers of the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission to investigate Sheriff-related issues, compel production of records and witnesses, review and evaluate the Office of the Inspector General's handling of complaints, and develop a recommended jail plan, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1334277, "no_votes": 497286, "total_votes": 1831563, "percent_yes": 72.84909118605258, "percent_no": 27.150908813947424, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure expanded the powers of the Los Angeles County Sheriff Civilian O...", "summary_text": "This measure expanded the powers of the Los Angeles County Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission to investigate sheriff-related issues, compel production of records and witnesses, review the Inspector General's complaint handling, and develop jail planning recommendations.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.793201", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.360929", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending Chapter 3.79 of the Los Angeles County Code to revise the duties and powers of the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission to investigate Sheriff-related issues, compel production of records and witnesses, review and evaluate the Office of the Inspector General's handling of complaints, and develop a recommended jail plan, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2946, "fingerprint": "2020|202000204|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000204|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5a77f71e0a438974", "measure_id": "202000204", "measure_letter": "RC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adding an ordinance with just cause eviction provisions and relocation fees, rent regulations applicable to units built before February 1, 1995 with exemptions, limits of 0 to 7% increase in annual rent based on CPI, an updated five member Landlord Tenant Commission to implement provisions and administration including establish a budget, assess fees, hire staff including attorneys, and initiate lawsuits while acting independently of Burbank City Council, Burbank City Manager and Burbank City Attorney be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17994, "no_votes": 31697, "total_votes": 49691, "percent_yes": 36.211788855124674, "percent_no": 63.788211144875326, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established rent control limiting annual rent increas...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established rent control limiting annual rent increases to 0-7% based on inflation for units built before February 1995, required just cause for evictions with relocation fees, and created an independent five-member commission with authority to implement these provisions, set budgets, assess fees, and initiate lawsuits. The measure failed with 36.2% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.802537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.366734", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adding an ordinance with just cause eviction provisions and relocation fees, rent regulations applicable to units built before February 1, 1995 with exemptions, limits of 0 to 7% increase in annual rent based on CPI, an updated five member Landlord Tenant Commission to implement provisions and administration including establish a budget, assess fees, hire staff including attorneys, and initiate lawsuits while acting independently of Burbank City Council, Burbank City Manager and Burbank City Attorney be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2929, "fingerprint": "2020|202000209|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000209|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "82f38a69fe75d262", "measure_id": "202000209", "measure_letter": "RD", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 743 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting Development Agreement No. 743 between the City of Commerce and RD Commerce, LLC [a California Limited Liability Company] for a commercial cannabis business be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2002, "no_votes": 2588, "total_votes": 4590, "percent_yes": 43.61655773420479, "percent_no": 56.38344226579521, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have adopted a development agreement between the City of C...", "summary_text": "This measure would have adopted a development agreement between the City of Commerce and RD Commerce, LLC to allow a commercial cannabis business to operate in the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.796658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.363145", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 743 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting Development Agreement No. 743 between the City of Commerce and RD Commerce, LLC [a California Limited Liability Company] for a commercial cannabis business be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2971, "fingerprint": "2020|202000215|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000215|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9b59fa2ccc8ce845", "measure_id": "202000215", "measure_letter": "RE", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to maintain essential services, including deferred parks/facilities/street maintenance, addressing homelessness, after-school/senior services, and economic recovery, by increasing the one-time 0.45% tax on real property sales, adding 1.5% on amounts from $1,500,000 to $2,999,999, 3% on amounts from $3,000,000 to $9,999,999, and 4% on amounts $10,000,000 and above, except for sales under $1,500,000, affordable housing, and first transfer of new multi-family properties, and providing $6,000,000 annually until repealed, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11510, "no_votes": 10671, "total_votes": 22181, "percent_yes": 51.89125828411704, "percent_no": 48.10874171588296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Los Angeles' real property transfer tax with a tiered ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Los Angeles' real property transfer tax with a tiered structure, raising rates to 1.5% on sales between $1.5-3 million, 3% on sales between $3-10 million, and 4% on sales above $10 million, while exempting sales under $1.5 million, affordable housing, and first transfers of new multi-family properties. The measure was expected to generate $6 million annually to fund city services including parks maintenance, homelessness programs, and after-school services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.813508", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.373095", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to maintain essential services, including deferred parks/facilities/street maintenance, addressing homelessness, after-school/senior services, and economic recovery, by increasing the one-time 0.45% tax on real property sales, adding 1.5% on amounts from $1,500,000 to $2,999,999, 3% on amounts from $3,000,000 to $9,999,999, and 4% on amounts $10,000,000 and above, except for sales under $1,500,000, affordable housing, and first transfer of new multi-family properties, and providing $6,000,000 annually until repealed, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2981, "fingerprint": "2020|202000203|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000203|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1125805045932130", "measure_id": "202000203", "measure_letter": "RP", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which provides that if, and only if, another local governmental entity seeks to increase the transaction and use tax (sales tax) in Beverly Hills, then the City may prevent this tax increase and instead impose a Beverly Hills transaction and use tax by up to \u00be% (approximately $28.06 million annually, indefinitely) so that the tax revenues will flow to Beverly Hills rather than the other governmental entity?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11143, "no_votes": 4200, "total_votes": 15343, "percent_yes": 72.62595320341524, "percent_no": 27.374046796584764, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows Beverly Hills to impose its own sales tax of up to 0", "summary_text": "This measure allows Beverly Hills to impose its own sales tax of up to 0.75% if another local government entity attempts to increase sales tax in the city, directing those tax revenues to Beverly Hills instead of the other entity. The tax would only be implemented as a defensive measure against external tax increases, not as an automatic tax on residents.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.819159", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.376448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which provides that if, and only if, another local governmental entity seeks to increase the transaction and use tax (sales tax) in Beverly Hills, then the City may prevent this tax increase and instead impose a Beverly Hills transaction and use tax by up to \u00be% (approximately $28.06 million annually, indefinitely) so that the tax revenues will flow to Beverly Hills rather than the other governmental entity?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2991, "fingerprint": "2020|202000538|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000538|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7d7ca6a620674603", "measure_id": "202000538", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update classrooms/labs/technology for 21st century learning; implement COVID-19 facility safety standards; address school facility inequities; reduce asbestos, earthquake and water quality hazards; and replace/renovate aging school classrooms/buildings, shall Los Angeles Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $7,000,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $0.02174 per $100 of assessed valuation, generating an estimated $329,528,000 annually until approximately 2055, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, no funds for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1206406, "no_votes": 490365, "total_votes": 1696771, "percent_yes": 71.10010720362382, "percent_no": 28.89989279637618, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Los Angeles Unified School District to issue $7 bi...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Los Angeles Unified School District to issue $7 billion in bonds to update classrooms and technology, implement COVID-19 safety standards, address facility inequities, and renovate aging school buildings. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately $0.02174 per $100 of assessed valuation, generating an estimated $329.5 million annually until around 2055.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.826376", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.380726", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update classrooms/labs/technology for 21st century learning; implement COVID-19 facility safety standards; address school facility inequities; reduce asbestos, earthquake and water quality hazards; and replace/renovate aging school classrooms/buildings, shall Los Angeles Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $7,000,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $0.02174 per $100 of assessed valuation, generating an estimated $329,528,000 annually until approximately 2055, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, no funds for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2930, "fingerprint": "2020|202000210|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000210|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f1f0f02a4593bd29", "measure_id": "202000210", "measure_letter": "RS", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 744 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting Development Agreement No. 744 between the City of Commerce and RS Innovations, Inc. [a California Corporation] for a commercial cannabis business be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1981, "no_votes": 2554, "total_votes": 4535, "percent_yes": 43.68246968026461, "percent_no": 56.31753031973539, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance would approve a development agreement between the City of Comme...", "summary_text": "The ordinance would approve a development agreement between the City of Commerce and RS Innovations, Inc. to establish a commercial cannabis business. The measure failed with 43.7% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.797049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.363330", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 744 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting Development Agreement No. 744 between the City of Commerce and RS Innovations, Inc. [a California Corporation] for a commercial cannabis business be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11123, "fingerprint": "2020|202000535|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000535|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ee51136bc25f2157", "measure_id": "202000535", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade all neighborhood schools, provide safe drinking water, remove asbestos/lead paint, improve fire safety, leaky roofs, natural disaster/emergency preparedness, retain/attract qualified teachers by acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, shall Duarte Unified School District's measure authorizing $79,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying 5 cents per $100 assessed valuation, raising on average $4,475,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizens oversight, all funds for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6782, "no_votes": 5053, "total_votes": 11835, "percent_yes": 57.30460498521335, "percent_no": 42.69539501478665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Duarte Unified School District to issue $79 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Duarte Unified School District to issue $79 million in bonds to fund school infrastructure improvements including safety upgrades, repairs, and facilities construction, financed through a property tax of 5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation. The measure passed in 2020 and includes citizen oversight requirements with all funds designated for local schools.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.400267", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.825559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.380176", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade all neighborhood schools, provide safe drinking water, remove asbestos/lead paint, improve fire safety, leaky roofs, natural disaster/emergency preparedness, retain/attract qualified teachers by acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, shall Duarte Unified School District's measure authorizing $79,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying 5 cents per $100 assessed valuation, raising on average $4,475,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizens oversight, all funds for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2988, "fingerprint": "2020|202000529|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000529|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "87e7d1f35c6c5de9", "measure_id": "202000529", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain schools by repairing and upgrading classrooms/restrooms/plumbing/electrical/heating/ air-conditioning/security/fire/earthquake safety systems; updating science/ engineering classrooms; repairing, constructing, acquiring educational/athletic/arts facilities/equipment, shall San Marino Unified School District's measure authorizing $200 million in bonds, within legal interest rates, levying $0.06 per $100 assessed value, averaging $11.9 million annually, while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with no increase to tax rate limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1801, "no_votes": 2576, "total_votes": 4377, "percent_yes": 41.14690427233264, "percent_no": 58.85309572766736, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized San Marino Unified School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized San Marino Unified School District to issue $200 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, safety systems, and educational equipment. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of $0.06 per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.823681", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.379088", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain schools by repairing and upgrading classrooms/restrooms/plumbing/electrical/heating/ air-conditioning/security/fire/earthquake safety systems; updating science/ engineering classrooms; repairing, constructing, acquiring educational/athletic/arts facilities/equipment, shall San Marino Unified School District's measure authorizing $200 million in bonds, within legal interest rates, levying $0.06 per $100 assessed value, averaging $11.9 million annually, while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with no increase to tax rate limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2931, "fingerprint": "2020|202000211|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000211|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "315427f72a88adb6", "measure_id": "202000211", "measure_letter": "SB", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 737 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 717 between the City of Commerce and 2SBK, Inc. [a California Corporation] for the relocation of a previously approved commercial cannabis business to 6445 Bandini Boulevard be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2222, "no_votes": 2452, "total_votes": 4674, "percent_yes": 47.53958065896448, "percent_no": 52.46041934103552, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would approve an amendment to a development agreement allowing...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would approve an amendment to a development agreement allowing a commercial cannabis business to relocate to 6445 Bandini Boulevard in Commerce, California. The measure failed with 47.5% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.797321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.363514", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 737 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 717 between the City of Commerce and 2SBK, Inc. [a California Corporation] for the relocation of a previously approved commercial cannabis business to 6445 Bandini Boulevard be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2932, "fingerprint": "2020|202000212|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000212|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1964f4d5014f2b77", "measure_id": "202000212", "measure_letter": "SC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 740 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 720 between the City of Commerce and Summit Manufacturing, LLC [a California Limited Liability Company] for the addition of cultivation as a license type to a previously approved commercial cannabis business be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2040, "no_votes": 2583, "total_votes": 4623, "percent_yes": 44.12719013627514, "percent_no": 55.87280986372486, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended a development agreement between the City of Co...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended a development agreement between the City of Commerce and Summit Manufacturing, LLC to add cannabis cultivation as an additional license type to their existing commercial cannabis business operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.797623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.363697", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 740 of the City Council of the City of Commerce approving and adopting First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 720 between the City of Commerce and Summit Manufacturing, LLC [a California Limited Liability Company] for the addition of cultivation as a license type to a previously approved commercial cannabis business be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2965, "fingerprint": "2020|202000182|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000182|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "92a0a3850ca1b064", "measure_id": "202000182", "measure_letter": "SD", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve San Dimas' long-term financial stability; maintain emergency response, neighborhood sheriff patrols; prevent thefts/burglaries; protect/clean local water sources; keep public areas safe/clean; repair streets/potholes; maintain senior, youth/afterschool services/other general services; shall a measure be adopted establishing a 0.75% sales tax providing approximately $4,700,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits/public disclosure of all spending, all funds benefiting San Dimas residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3479, "no_votes": 5552, "total_votes": 9031, "percent_yes": 38.52286568486325, "percent_no": 61.47713431513675, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 0.75% sales tax in San Dimas to generate approximately $4.7 million annually for general city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, water protection, and community programs. The tax would have continued indefinitely until repealed by voters and required audits and public disclosure of spending.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.809841", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.371191", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve San Dimas' long-term financial stability; maintain emergency response, neighborhood sheriff patrols; prevent thefts/burglaries; protect/clean local water sources; keep public areas safe/clean; repair streets/potholes; maintain senior, youth/afterschool services/other general services; shall a measure be adopted establishing a 0.75% sales tax providing approximately $4,700,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits/public disclosure of all spending, all funds benefiting San Dimas residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11116, "fingerprint": "2020|202000522|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000522|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "66c00d12018b9a67", "measure_id": "202000522", "measure_letter": "SF", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, replace portables with permanent classrooms to meet 21st century needs, upgrade plumbing, electrical systems, improve student health/safety, construct support facilities, qualify for $12,000,000 in state grants, shall Keppel Union School District's measure be adopted to authorize the issue of $17,900,000 in bonds at legal rates, estimated repayment averaging approximately $912,000 annually through maturity, projected levies of $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation, no money for administrator salaries, annual audits and citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1756, "no_votes": 2019, "total_votes": 3775, "percent_yes": 46.51655629139072, "percent_no": 53.48344370860928, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Keppel Union School District to issue $17", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Keppel Union School District to issue $17.9 million in bonds to replace portable classrooms with permanent ones, upgrade infrastructure systems, and construct support facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation over multiple years.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.397194", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.821468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.377804", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, replace portables with permanent classrooms to meet 21st century needs, upgrade plumbing, electrical systems, improve student health/safety, construct support facilities, qualify for $12,000,000 in state grants, shall Keppel Union School District's measure be adopted to authorize the issue of $17,900,000 in bonds at legal rates, estimated repayment averaging approximately $912,000 annually through maturity, projected levies of $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation, no money for administrator salaries, annual audits and citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2983, "fingerprint": "2020|202000233|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000233|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2c31825e2c9ada03", "measure_id": "202000233", "measure_letter": "SF", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure that the maximum amount of sales tax revenues generated in San Fernando remain in San Fernando, and to increase funding for street and sidewalk improvements; public infrastructure; local business reinvestment; public Wi-Fi; long-term debt reduction; wages and other general municipal purposes, shall the existing transactions and use tax rate be increased from the current rate of 1/2% to a new rate of 3/4% to raise approximately $1,100,000 annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4628, "no_votes": 3574, "total_votes": 8202, "percent_yes": 56.42526213118752, "percent_no": 43.57473786881248, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased San Fernando's local sales tax rate from 0", "summary_text": "The measure increased San Fernando's local sales tax rate from 0.5% to 0.75% to generate approximately $1.1 million annually for street improvements, public infrastructure, business reinvestment, municipal debt reduction, and other general city purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.820549", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.377248", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure that the maximum amount of sales tax revenues generated in San Fernando remain in San Fernando, and to increase funding for street and sidewalk improvements; public infrastructure; local business reinvestment; public Wi-Fi; long-term debt reduction; wages and other general municipal purposes, shall the existing transactions and use tax rate be increased from the current rate of 1/2% to a new rate of 3/4% to raise approximately $1,100,000 annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2966, "fingerprint": "2020|202000184|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000184|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "63e23bff679060d3", "measure_id": "202000184", "measure_letter": "SG", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City of San Gabriel's fire, police/ 911 response; prevent thefts/burglaries; keep public areas safe/clean; recruit/retain well-trained police, firefighters/paramedics; repair streets/potholes; attract/retain local businesses; maintain senior services, youth programs, parks, other general services/aging infrastructure; shall an ordinance establishing a 3/4\u00a2 transaction and use (sales) tax, providing approximately $3,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted; requiring independent audits, all funds benefiting City of San Gabriel residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3970, "no_votes": 2201, "total_votes": 6171, "percent_yes": 64.33317128504295, "percent_no": 35.66682871495705, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in the City of San Gabriel to generate approximately $3 million annually for general city services including public safety, infrastructure repairs, parks, and senior/youth programs. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters and requires independent audits with all funds designated for city resident benefits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.810111", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.371399", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City of San Gabriel's fire, police/ 911 response; prevent thefts/burglaries; keep public areas safe/clean; recruit/retain well-trained police, firefighters/paramedics; repair streets/potholes; attract/retain local businesses; maintain senior services, youth programs, parks, other general services/aging infrastructure; shall an ordinance establishing a 3/4\u00a2 transaction and use (sales) tax, providing approximately $3,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted; requiring independent audits, all funds benefiting City of San Gabriel residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2978, "fingerprint": "2020|202000235|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000235|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "81d0ed2f6a39fb18", "measure_id": "202000235", "measure_letter": "SM", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect essential services including addressing homelessness, cleaning beaches/parks, public safety/ fire/ emergency response, protections for tenants and seniors, supporting libraries, small business recovery, food for the hungry, and after-school/ mental health services for youth, shall the City of Santa Monica increase the one-time real estate transfer tax paid on each sale of property for $5 million or more by $3.00 per $1,000 of sales price, exempting affordable housing projects, providing $3 million annually for local services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36465, "no_votes": 14268, "total_votes": 50733, "percent_yes": 71.87629353675122, "percent_no": 28.12370646324878, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Santa Monica's real estate transfer tax by $3", "summary_text": "This measure increased Santa Monica's real estate transfer tax by $3.00 per $1,000 of sales price on properties selling for $5 million or more, with affordable housing projects exempted. The tax increase was projected to generate approximately $3 million annually for various city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.817104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.375159", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect essential services including addressing homelessness, cleaning beaches/parks, public safety/ fire/ emergency response, protections for tenants and seniors, supporting libraries, small business recovery, food for the hungry, and after-school/ mental health services for youth, shall the City of Santa Monica increase the one-time real estate transfer tax paid on each sale of property for $5 million or more by $3.00 per $1,000 of sales price, exempting affordable housing projects, providing $3 million annually for local services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2916, "fingerprint": "2020|202000025|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000025|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "86dd26ec9038361f", "measure_id": "202000025", "measure_letter": "SP", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide students additional opportunities for career and academic success at local schools, including Hawthorne, Lawndale, and Leuzinger High Schools, and to optimize athletic facilities for joint use with local communities, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2016-1 of the Local Public Schools Funding Authority issue $125 million in bonds, at legal rates, averaging $8.5 million annually while bonds are outstanding, at 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, to upgrade and construct classrooms, athletic facilities and fields, with mandatory audits and independent citizens oversight, and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12612, "no_votes": 5620, "total_votes": 18232, "percent_yes": 69.17507678806494, "percent_no": 30.824923211935058, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized School Facilities Improvement District No", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized School Facilities Improvement District No. 2016-1 to issue $125 million in bonds to upgrade and construct classrooms, athletic facilities, and fields at local schools including Hawthorne, Lawndale, and Leuzinger High Schools. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value and include mandatory audits and independent citizens oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.792927", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.360707", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide students additional opportunities for career and academic success at local schools, including Hawthorne, Lawndale, and Leuzinger High Schools, and to optimize athletic facilities for joint use with local communities, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2016-1 of the Local Public Schools Funding Authority issue $125 million in bonds, at legal rates, averaging $8.5 million annually while bonds are outstanding, at 3\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, to upgrade and construct classrooms, athletic facilities and fields, with mandatory audits and independent citizens oversight, and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2952, "fingerprint": "2020|202000161|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000161|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bf2d3d6361d413ad", "measure_id": "202000161", "measure_letter": "SS", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted by the City of Avalon enacting a one-quarter percent (1/4%) transactions and use (sales) tax, generating approximately $240,000.00 annually for general City services until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 363, "no_votes": 665, "total_votes": 1028, "percent_yes": 35.311284046692606, "percent_no": 64.6887159533074, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted a 0.25% sales tax in the City of Avalon to generate approximately $240,000 annually for general city services until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.804298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.367845", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted by the City of Avalon enacting a one-quarter percent (1/4%) transactions and use (sales) tax, generating approximately $240,000.00 annually for general City services until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11106, "fingerprint": "2020|202000225|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000225|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f7c9bfebae73efd2", "measure_id": "202000225", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted increasing the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel and other lodging guests from 12% to 15% of rent charged, raising approximately $775,000 annually until ended by voters, with revenue to be controlled and used locally for general municipal services in Malibu?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3427, "no_votes": 2673, "total_votes": 6100, "percent_yes": 56.18032786885247, "percent_no": 43.81967213114753, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax on hotel and lodging guest...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax on hotel and lodging guests in Malibu from 12% to 15% of rent charged. The tax is estimated to generate approximately $775,000 annually for general municipal services until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.393432", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.815737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.374424", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted increasing the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel and other lodging guests from 12% to 15% of rent charged, raising approximately $775,000 annually until ended by voters, with revenue to be controlled and used locally for general municipal services in Malibu?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2936, "fingerprint": "2020|202000169|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000169|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ead3a5a8be768046", "measure_id": "202000169", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed, with the first appointment to be made upon the earlier of (i) the expiration of the term of office of the person elected to serve as City Treasurer at the March 3, 2020 General Municipal Election; or (ii) a vacancy in such office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3356, "no_votes": 1821, "total_votes": 5177, "percent_yes": 64.8251883330114, "percent_no": 35.1748116669886, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the Los Angeles City Treasurer position from elected to ...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the Los Angeles City Treasurer position from elected to appointed, with the transition occurring either when the 2020 elected treasurer's term expires or if the office becomes vacant earlier.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.798949", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.364470", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed, with the first appointment to be made upon the earlier of (i) the expiration of the term of office of the person elected to serve as City Treasurer at the March 3, 2020 General Municipal Election; or (ii) a vacancy in such office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11108, "fingerprint": "2020|202000229|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000229|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1b81e963a315e1ee", "measure_id": "202000229", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide additional funding for general city services such as maintaining streets, roads, sidewalks, public safety services, pedestrian and bicyclist safety, safe routes to schools, and for other critical purposes; Shall the City of Pico Rivera increase the Transit Occupancy Tax that applies only to the guests of hotels, motels, and short-term rentals, and other lodging from 10% to 15%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10671, "no_votes": 14550, "total_votes": 25221, "percent_yes": 42.30997977875579, "percent_no": 57.69002022124421, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased Pico Rivera's transient occupancy tax on hot...", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased Pico Rivera's transient occupancy tax on hotel, motel, and short-term rental guests from 10% to 15%. The additional revenue would have funded general city services including street maintenance, public safety, and pedestrian safety programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.394019", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.816833", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.374978", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide additional funding for general city services such as maintaining streets, roads, sidewalks, public safety services, pedestrian and bicyclist safety, safe routes to schools, and for other critical purposes; Shall the City of Pico Rivera increase the Transit Occupancy Tax that applies only to the guests of hotels, motels, and short-term rentals, and other lodging from 10% to 15%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2954, "fingerprint": "2020|202000163|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000163|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6beb644bc0b23a8e", "measure_id": "202000163", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, entitled City of Bell Transactions and Use Tax Measure, establishing a three quarter cent per dollar (0.75%) general sales tax, annually providing an estimated $1.4 million in revenue, until ended by voters, with funds being deposited into the City's General Fund for police, streets, buildings, parks, recreation and other general functions of the City be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1610, "no_votes": 2435, "total_votes": 4045, "percent_yes": 39.80222496909765, "percent_no": 60.19777503090235, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a 0.75% general sales tax in the City of Bell, generating an estimated $1.4 million annually for the city's general fund to support police, streets, buildings, parks, recreation, and other municipal services. The tax would have remained in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.804870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.368215", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, entitled City of Bell Transactions and Use Tax Measure, establishing a three quarter cent per dollar (0.75%) general sales tax, annually providing an estimated $1.4 million in revenue, until ended by voters, with funds being deposited into the City's General Fund for police, streets, buildings, parks, recreation and other general functions of the City be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11110, "fingerprint": "2020|202000239|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000239|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6351aa7f9964618f", "measure_id": "202000239", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City services, such as Public Safety, Paramedic and Library services, shall an Ordinance be adopted to: Extend the City's Utility User Tax at its current rate of 7.5% for all utilities, to be effective on January 1, 2021 and remain in effect until otherwise terminated by majority vote of the electorate in South Pasadena?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11018, "no_votes": 3512, "total_votes": 14530, "percent_yes": 75.82931865106676, "percent_no": 24.170681348933243, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended South Pasadena's existing 7", "summary_text": "This measure extended South Pasadena's existing 7.5% utility user tax on all utilities, effective January 1, 2021, to continue funding city services including public safety, paramedic, and library services. The tax will remain in effect until terminated by a majority vote of the electorate.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.394775", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.818062", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.375715", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City services, such as Public Safety, Paramedic and Library services, shall an Ordinance be adopted to: Extend the City's Utility User Tax at its current rate of 7.5% for all utilities, to be effective on January 1, 2021 and remain in effect until otherwise terminated by majority vote of the electorate in South Pasadena?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11095, "fingerprint": "2020|202000192|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000192|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e272bcfe50187fb4", "measure_id": "202000192", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapters 3.5 and 3.6 of Article III of the Vernon City Charter be amended to change the process for selecting the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore from one by which the other Council Members vote to one by which Council Members are appointed according to an automatic rotation schedule based on year of election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51, "no_votes": 14, "total_votes": 65, "percent_yes": 78.46153846153847, "percent_no": 21.538461538461533, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment changes the process for selecting Vernon's Mayor and M...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment changes the process for selecting Vernon's Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore from a system where council members vote on the positions to an automatic rotation schedule based on when each council member was elected.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-04-14", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.383069", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.800168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.365233", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapters 3.5 and 3.6 of Article III of the Vernon City Charter be amended to change the process for selecting the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore from one by which the other Council Members vote to one by which Council Members are appointed according to an automatic rotation schedule based on year of election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2938, "fingerprint": "2020|202000187|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000187|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1169788141382b36", "measure_id": "202000187", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to allow the City Council 60 days to fill a vacancy in an elective office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27123, "no_votes": 9302, "total_votes": 36425, "percent_yes": 74.46259437199726, "percent_no": 25.537405628002745, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to give the City Council 60...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to give the City Council 60 days to fill vacancies in elected positions. It passed with 74.5% voter approval in 2020.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.799812", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.365051", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to allow the City Council 60 days to fill a vacancy in an elective office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11120, "fingerprint": "2020|202000530|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000530|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "68084c442de48135", "measure_id": "202000530", "measure_letter": "US", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local elementary schools by increasing access to science, technology, engineering, math, and arts instruction; modernizing classrooms and labs; upgrading security and emergency communication systems; replacing aging portable classrooms; shall the Sulphur Springs Union School District measure be adopted to issue $78,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of $4,000,000 annually through maturity, projected levies of $0.022 per $100 of assessed valuation, audits, an oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6152, "no_votes": 8279, "total_votes": 14431, "percent_yes": 42.63044834037835, "percent_no": 57.36955165962165, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Sulphur Springs Union School District ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Sulphur Springs Union School District to issue $78 million in bonds to fund school improvements including STEAM instruction facilities, classroom and lab modernization, security upgrades, and replacement of portable classrooms. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of approximately $0.022 per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.398924", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.823953", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.379273", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local elementary schools by increasing access to science, technology, engineering, math, and arts instruction; modernizing classrooms and labs; upgrading security and emergency communication systems; replacing aging portable classrooms; shall the Sulphur Springs Union School District measure be adopted to issue $78,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of $4,000,000 annually through maturity, projected levies of $0.022 per $100 of assessed valuation, audits, an oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2975, "fingerprint": "2020|202000223|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000223|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b894e2c3e6aaa9ef", "measure_id": "202000223", "measure_letter": "US", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for community healthcare services; air/water quality and climate change programs; increase childhood education/youth programs; expand job training opportunities; and maintain other general fund programs, shall a measure be adopted increasing Long Beach's general oil production tax from 15\u00a2 to maximum 30\u00a2 per barrel, subject to annual adjustments, generating approximately $1,600,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits/local control of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107040, "no_votes": 80473, "total_votes": 187513, "percent_yes": 57.084042173076, "percent_no": 42.915957826924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Long Beach's oil production tax from 15 cents to a max...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Long Beach's oil production tax from 15 cents to a maximum of 30 cents per barrel, with annual adjustments, generating approximately $1.6 million annually for community healthcare, environmental programs, education, job training, and other general fund services. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters and requires audits and local control of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.815090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.374041", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for community healthcare services; air/water quality and climate change programs; increase childhood education/youth programs; expand job training opportunities; and maintain other general fund programs, shall a measure be adopted increasing Long Beach's general oil production tax from 15\u00a2 to maximum 30\u00a2 per barrel, subject to annual adjustments, generating approximately $1,600,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits/local control of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2973, "fingerprint": "2020|202000220|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000220|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c1173e6410d4a83e", "measure_id": "202000220", "measure_letter": "UU", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal services such as 911 emergency response, fire/paramedic/public safety, homeless reduction programs, senior/youth programs, disaster preparedness, and repairing/maintaining streets/roads/potholes/storm drains, shall an ordinance creating an additional 2.5% locally-controlled tax on utility bills be adopted, providing approximately $3,200,000 annually in new funds until ended by voters, exempting senior citizen/disabled-headed households, and requiring independent audits and transparency?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14240, "no_votes": 15365, "total_votes": 29605, "percent_yes": 48.09998311096098, "percent_no": 51.90001688903902, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have created a 2", "summary_text": "The measure would have created a 2.5% tax on utility bills to fund general municipal services including emergency response, public safety, homeless programs, and infrastructure maintenance, generating approximately $3.2 million annually with exemptions for senior and disabled-headed households. The tax would have remained in effect until repealed by voters and included requirements for independent audits and transparency measures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.814140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.373474", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal services such as 911 emergency response, fire/paramedic/public safety, homeless reduction programs, senior/youth programs, disaster preparedness, and repairing/maintaining streets/roads/potholes/storm drains, shall an ordinance creating an additional 2.5% locally-controlled tax on utility bills be adopted, providing approximately $3,200,000 annually in new funds until ended by voters, exempting senior citizen/disabled-headed households, and requiring independent audits and transparency?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11118, "fingerprint": "2020|202000524|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000524|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b4e8f31f3de915bd", "measure_id": "202000524", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To locally fund upgrades for safe/modern schools; enhance instructional technology, college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts; improve safety, security, emergency/fire systems; repair, acquire, construct, equip classrooms, sites, facilities, roofs, plumbing, heating/air conditioning; shall Las Virgenes Unified School District's measure authorizing $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents per $100 assessed value ($11,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight and local control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11640, "no_votes": 9588, "total_votes": 21228, "percent_yes": 54.83323911814585, "percent_no": 45.16676088185415, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Las Virgenes Unified School District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Las Virgenes Unified School District to issue $198 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements, technology upgrades, and safety system enhancements, paid for through a property tax of 2 cents per $100 of assessed value. The measure failed despite receiving 54.8% support because it required a two-thirds majority to pass.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.397612", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.822027", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.378173", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To locally fund upgrades for safe/modern schools; enhance instructional technology, college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts; improve safety, security, emergency/fire systems; repair, acquire, construct, equip classrooms, sites, facilities, roofs, plumbing, heating/air conditioning; shall Las Virgenes Unified School District's measure authorizing $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents per $100 assessed value ($11,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight and local control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11102, "fingerprint": "2020|202000193|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000193|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9a6720f22c1fc621", "measure_id": "202000193", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve city services including safety, infrastructure, streets and 47 housing, shall the ordinance to increase the sales tax by three- quarter of one percent, providing up to $6 million annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47, "no_votes": 18, "total_votes": 65, "percent_yes": 72.3076923076923, "percent_no": 27.692307692307693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Los Angeles's sales tax by 0", "summary_text": "This measure increased Los Angeles's sales tax by 0.75% to generate up to $6 million annually for city services including safety, infrastructure, streets, and housing.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-04-14", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.390068", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.811073", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.371985", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve city services including safety, infrastructure, streets and 47 housing, shall the ordinance to increase the sales tax by three- quarter of one percent, providing up to $6 million annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2940, "fingerprint": "2020|202000198|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000198|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8dda8a3ddc9a901d", "measure_id": "202000198", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted which amends the Alhambra City Charter to include restrictions on campaign finance in local elections and which establishes by-district elections for the Alhambra City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21218, "no_votes": 6618, "total_votes": 27836, "percent_yes": 76.22503233223165, "percent_no": 23.77496766776835, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance amends the Alhambra City Charter to add campaign finance restr...", "summary_text": "This ordinance amends the Alhambra City Charter to add campaign finance restrictions for local elections and establishes district-based elections for City Council seats instead of at-large elections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.800708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.365641", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted which amends the Alhambra City Charter to include restrictions on campaign finance in local elections and which establishes by-district elections for the Alhambra City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2970, "fingerprint": "2020|202000213|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000213|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "14d49bcea90becf1", "measure_id": "202000213", "measure_letter": "VS", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain Commerce's long-term financial stability and public safety, including police/fire/911 emergency response; protect parks and library services; maintain transportation services; protect local drinking water sources; repair streets; protect youth, senior, and other general services; shall an ordinance establishing a one-quarter of one percent (1/4%) transaction and use (sales) tax, providing approximately $8,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted; requiring independent audits, public disclosure of spending, all funds benefitting Commerce residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3260, "no_votes": 1365, "total_votes": 4625, "percent_yes": 70.48648648648648, "percent_no": 29.513513513513516, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.25% sales tax in Commerce, California, generating approximately $8 million annually to fund police, fire, emergency services, parks, libraries, transportation, street repairs, and other city services. The tax includes requirements for independent audits and public disclosure of spending, and can only be ended by voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.813072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.372911", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain Commerce's long-term financial stability and public safety, including police/fire/911 emergency response; protect parks and library services; maintain transportation services; protect local drinking water sources; repair streets; protect youth, senior, and other general services; shall an ordinance establishing a one-quarter of one percent (1/4%) transaction and use (sales) tax, providing approximately $8,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted; requiring independent audits, public disclosure of spending, all funds benefitting Commerce residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11101, "fingerprint": "2020|202000190|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000190|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0db9642a769069e4", "measure_id": "202000190", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide the City of Whittier with funding available to hire/retain police officers to reduce crime/gangs/drugs/graffiti; reduce 911 response times; address homelessness; increase neighborhood/park/business patrols; maintain streets, sidewalks, parks, senior services, afterschool programs, and provide general services shall the measure establishing a three-quarter cent sales tax be adopted, providing approximately $6,375,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, all funds locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12048, "no_votes": 9007, "total_votes": 21055, "percent_yes": 57.2215625742104, "percent_no": 42.7784374257896, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in Whittier to generate approximately $6.375 million annually for police services, infrastructure maintenance, social programs, and general city services. The tax requires independent audits and remains in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.389874", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.810795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.371804", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the City of Whittier with funding available to hire/retain police officers to reduce crime/gangs/drugs/graffiti; reduce 911 response times; address homelessness; increase neighborhood/park/business patrols; maintain streets, sidewalks, parks, senior services, afterschool programs, and provide general services shall the measure establishing a three-quarter cent sales tax be adopted, providing approximately $6,375,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, all funds locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2919, "fingerprint": "2020|202000027|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000027|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8941f6a58d519c57", "measure_id": "202000027", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an appropriations limit, as defined by Subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, be established for the Wrightwood Community Services District, Counties of San Bernardino and Los Angeles, State of California, in the amount of $660,612?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71, "no_votes": 26, "total_votes": 97, "percent_yes": 73.19587628865979, "percent_no": 26.80412371134021, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a $660,612 appropriations limit for the Wrightwood C...", "summary_text": "This measure established a $660,612 appropriations limit for the Wrightwood Community Services District as required by the California Constitution's Gann Limit provisions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.793734", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.361294", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an appropriations limit, as defined by Subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, be established for the Wrightwood Community Services District, Counties of San Bernardino and Los Angeles, State of California, in the amount of $660,612?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2980, "fingerprint": "2020|202000189|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000189|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "02c53dac4b4c8bcd", "measure_id": "202000189", "measure_letter": "WC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance establishing a three-quarter percent (0.75%) local sales tax (transactions and use tax) that will raise approximately $9.7 million annually for the City's general fund until ended by voters and establishing an Oversight Committee, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4140, "no_votes": 16529, "total_votes": 20669, "percent_yes": 20.02999661328559, "percent_no": 79.97000338671441, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a 0.75% local sales tax in Los Angeles to raise approximately $9.7 million annually for the city's general fund, with an oversight committee to monitor the funds.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.818608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.376083", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance establishing a three-quarter percent (0.75%) local sales tax (transactions and use tax) that will raise approximately $9.7 million annually for the City's general fund until ended by voters and establishing an Oversight Committee, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2967, "fingerprint": "2020|202000188|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000188|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "848ab47ec51261e9", "measure_id": "202000188", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure authorizing a local, City of Torrance 3/4\u00a2 sales tax (to be levied only if a district sales tax measure has qualified for a ballot and may continue to be imposed only if that district measure receives voter approval), to fund municipal services, such as maintaining fire, paramedic, police services; repairing streets; addressing homelessness be adopted, generating approximately $30,000,000 annually until ended by Torrance voters, requiring independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15662, "no_votes": 21950, "total_votes": 37612, "percent_yes": 41.64096564926087, "percent_no": 58.35903435073913, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized a 0.75 cent local sales tax in Torrance to fund municipal services including fire, paramedic, and police services, street repairs, and homelessness programs, generating approximately $30 million annually. The tax was contingent on a separate district sales tax measure also qualifying for and receiving voter approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.810428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.371616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure authorizing a local, City of Torrance 3/4\u00a2 sales tax (to be levied only if a district sales tax measure has qualified for a ballot and may continue to be imposed only if that district measure receives voter approval), to fund municipal services, such as maintaining fire, paramedic, police services; repairing streets; addressing homelessness be adopted, generating approximately $30,000,000 annually until ended by Torrance voters, requiring independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11122, "fingerprint": "2020|202000534|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000534|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "339856273b26d4b0", "measure_id": "202000534", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain qualified teachers/improve education by: upgrading job training, science, technology classrooms, laboratories; meeting earthquake/fire/clean drinking water safety; providing resources for students/veterans preparing for university transfer/jobs; removing leaky roofs, mold, lead paint; shall Citrus Community College District issue $298,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average $25 per $100,000 assessed valuation, generating $16,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, oversight, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54504, "no_votes": 40011, "total_votes": 94515, "percent_yes": 57.66703697825742, "percent_no": 42.33296302174258, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Citrus Community College District to issue $298 mi...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Citrus Community College District to issue $298 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom upgrades, safety renovations, and infrastructure repairs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.400063", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.825221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.379995", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain qualified teachers/improve education by: upgrading job training, science, technology classrooms, laboratories; meeting earthquake/fire/clean drinking water safety; providing resources for students/veterans preparing for university transfer/jobs; removing leaky roofs, mold, lead paint; shall Citrus Community College District issue $298,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average $25 per $100,000 assessed valuation, generating $16,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, oversight, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2964, "fingerprint": "2020|202000181|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000181|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c065e8b6d2c59f06", "measure_id": "202000181", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City of Paramount public safety; gang prevention, youth/afterschool programs; neighborhood Sheriff patrols; protect local clean drinking water supplies; address homelessness; repair streets/potholes; maintain storm drains/prevent flooding; clean up illegal dumping; make public areas safe/clean, and keep local sales tax revenue in Paramount supporting general services; shall the City of Paramount adopt an ordinance establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $4,500,000 annually, subject to annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4324, "no_votes": 1734, "total_votes": 6058, "percent_yes": 71.37669197755034, "percent_no": 28.623308022449663, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75-cent sales tax in Paramount, California, generating approximately $4.5 million annually for general city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and community programs. The tax revenue is subject to annual independent audits and remains within the city.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.809571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.371001", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City of Paramount public safety; gang prevention, youth/afterschool programs; neighborhood Sheriff patrols; protect local clean drinking water supplies; address homelessness; repair streets/potholes; maintain storm drains/prevent flooding; clean up illegal dumping; make public areas safe/clean, and keep local sales tax revenue in Paramount supporting general services; shall the City of Paramount adopt an ordinance establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $4,500,000 annually, subject to annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2953, "fingerprint": "2020|202000162|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000162|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8a21d349eb46e926", "measure_id": "202000162", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City of Azusa police, firefighter and paramedic staffing levels, 9-1-1 emergency response services, gang enforcement and neighborhood patrols; address homelessness to maintain public health/safety; repair parks, library, community centers; and maintain graffiti removal, senior services including meals on wheels, afterschool programs and other City services, shall a measure be adopted establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $4,500,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring annual independent audits with all funds benefiting Azusa residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4651, "no_votes": 2812, "total_votes": 7463, "percent_yes": 62.32078252713386, "percent_no": 37.67921747286614, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in the City of Azusa to fund police, fire, and emergency services, homelessness programs, park and facility repairs, and various community services. The tax generates approximately $4.5 million annually and requires annual independent audits, continuing until ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.804570", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.368025", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City of Azusa police, firefighter and paramedic staffing levels, 9-1-1 emergency response services, gang enforcement and neighborhood patrols; address homelessness to maintain public health/safety; repair parks, library, community centers; and maintain graffiti removal, senior services including meals on wheels, afterschool programs and other City services, shall a measure be adopted establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $4,500,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring annual independent audits with all funds benefiting Azusa residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2993, "fingerprint": "2020|202000541|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000541|MADERA", "content_hash": "d126684ac85ffc85", "measure_id": "202000541", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade job training/instructional classrooms, science/computer labs; improve student safety, emergency communication/security systems, shall Merced Community College District's measure authorizing $247,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25 /$100,000 assessed valuation ($14,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, requiring audits/citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, all funds used locally to improve opportunities for veterans, remove asbestos/lead paint and acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1060, "no_votes": 2070, "total_votes": 3130, "percent_yes": 33.86581469648562, "percent_no": 66.13418530351439, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Merced Community College District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Merced Community College District to issue $247 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms and labs, improve safety systems, remove hazardous materials, and construct or repair facilities and equipment. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.827603", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.381464", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade job training/instructional classrooms, science/computer labs; improve student safety, emergency communication/security systems, shall Merced Community College District's measure authorizing $247,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25 /$100,000 assessed valuation ($14,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, requiring audits/citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, all funds used locally to improve opportunities for veterans, remove asbestos/lead paint and acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2994, "fingerprint": "2020|202000542|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000542|MADERA", "content_hash": "4b1fbc0225cb34e9", "measure_id": "202000542", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a multi-purpose center for school and community use; and update and modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Raymond-Knowles Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $1,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $100,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233, "no_votes": 232, "total_votes": 465, "percent_yes": 50.10752688172043, "percent_no": 49.89247311827957, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Raymond-Knowles Union School District t...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Raymond-Knowles Union School District to issue $1.5 million in bonds to construct a multi-purpose center and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $100,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.828044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.381650", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a multi-purpose center for school and community use; and update and modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Raymond-Knowles Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $1,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $100,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2995, "fingerprint": "2020|202000543|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000543|MADERA", "content_hash": "2423d791cdef2a35", "measure_id": "202000543", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms and other school facilities; and make health, safety and accessibility upgrades and improvements; shall Raymond-Knowles Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $1,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $100,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233, "no_votes": 228, "total_votes": 461, "percent_yes": 50.54229934924079, "percent_no": 49.45770065075921, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Raymond-Knowles Union School District ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Raymond-Knowles Union School District to issue $1.5 million in bonds to modernize and construct school facilities, including classrooms and restrooms, and make health, safety and accessibility improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.828340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.381842", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms and other school facilities; and make health, safety and accessibility upgrades and improvements; shall Raymond-Knowles Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $1,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $100,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 2992, "fingerprint": "2020|202000241|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000241|MADERA", "content_hash": "fa55fa94b4fab766", "measure_id": "202000241", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure which would tax cannabis and hemp businesses if City permits and regulates such businesses, at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% gross receipts for retail businesses, and 4% for all other such businesses which is projected to generate $720,000 to $1,080,000 annually and continue in effect until terminated by City voters with funds generated used for general fund purposes be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10417, "no_votes": 5094, "total_votes": 15511, "percent_yes": 67.15879053574882, "percent_no": 32.84120946425118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established a tax on cannabis and hemp businesses in Madera at ra...", "summary_text": "The measure established a tax on cannabis and hemp businesses in Madera at rates up to $10 per square foot for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis businesses. The tax was projected to generate $720,000 to $1,080,000 annually for the city's general fund.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.827221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.381275", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure which would tax cannabis and hemp businesses if City permits and regulates such businesses, at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% gross receipts for retail businesses, and 4% for all other such businesses which is projected to generate $720,000 to $1,080,000 annually and continue in effect until terminated by City voters with funds generated used for general fund purposes be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3004, "fingerprint": "2020|202000544|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000544|MARIN", "content_hash": "7949db7cca263c19", "measure_id": "202000544", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure quality education and protect $6,000,000 in annual school funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Novato Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted to attract/retain qualified teachers; protect quality math, science, reading, writing instruction; and expand counseling, by renewing the current $251 annual parcel tax and adding $125/parcel, for eight years with inflation adjustments, senior exemptions, independent oversight, no money for administrators and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13524, "no_votes": 10890, "total_votes": 24414, "percent_yes": 55.39444580978127, "percent_no": 44.60555419021873, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have renewed Novato Unified School District's existing $25...", "summary_text": "This measure would have renewed Novato Unified School District's existing $251 annual parcel tax and added an additional $125 per parcel for eight years, with inflation adjustments and senior exemptions, to fund teacher retention, core academic instruction, and expanded counseling services. The measure failed despite receiving 55.4% support, likely requiring a two-thirds supermajority for passage.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.831151", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.383510", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure quality education and protect $6,000,000 in annual school funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Novato Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted to attract/retain qualified teachers; protect quality math, science, reading, writing instruction; and expand counseling, by renewing the current $251 annual parcel tax and adding $125/parcel, for eight years with inflation adjustments, senior exemptions, independent oversight, no money for administrators and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3005, "fingerprint": "2020|202000545|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000545|MARIN", "content_hash": "09bfb80efa0adc3f", "measure_id": "202000545", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high quality education with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Tamalpais Union High School District maintain excellent science, technology, engineering, math, reading and writing instruction; attract/retain highly qualified teachers; and support music and art by adopting a measure renewing funding at the current $455 rate and adding $190 per parcel, providing $23 million annually for 10 years, with senior exemptions, cost of living adjustments, independent oversight and all funds for Tamalpais Union High School District students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36296, "no_votes": 20563, "total_votes": 56859, "percent_yes": 63.83510086353963, "percent_no": 36.16489913646037, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have renewed an existing $455 per parcel tax and added an a...", "summary_text": "The measure would have renewed an existing $455 per parcel tax and added an additional $190 per parcel tax to fund Tamalpais Union High School District programs, generating approximately $23 million annually for 10 years. The funds would support science, technology, math, reading, writing, music, and arts instruction, as well as teacher retention, with provisions for senior exemptions and cost of living adjustments.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.831477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.383700", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high quality education with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Tamalpais Union High School District maintain excellent science, technology, engineering, math, reading and writing instruction; attract/retain highly qualified teachers; and support music and art by adopting a measure renewing funding at the current $455 rate and adding $190 per parcel, providing $23 million annually for 10 years, with senior exemptions, cost of living adjustments, independent oversight and all funds for Tamalpais Union High School District students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2997, "fingerprint": "2020|202000029|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000029|MARIN", "content_hash": "2d7b391b74c03c82", "measure_id": "202000029", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To support coordinated wildfire prevention including early detection, warning and alerts; reducing vegetation; ensuring defensible space around homes, neighborhoods and critical infrastructure; and improving disaster evacuation routes/procedures; shall the Marin Wildfire Prevention Measure, levying up to 10\u00a2 per building square foot tax ($75 per multifamily unit or as described in the full measure) for ten years, providing $19,300,000 annually, with annual inflation adjustments, independent citizen oversight/audits, and low-income senior exemptions, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75638, "no_votes": 31200, "total_votes": 106838, "percent_yes": 70.79690746738052, "percent_no": 29.20309253261948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure levies a property tax of up to 10 cents per building square foot ...", "summary_text": "The measure levies a property tax of up to 10 cents per building square foot (or $75 per multifamily unit) for ten years to fund wildfire prevention activities including early detection systems, vegetation reduction, defensible space creation, and evacuation route improvements. The tax includes annual inflation adjustments, independent oversight, and exemptions for low-income seniors, generating approximately $19.3 million annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.828904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.382214", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support coordinated wildfire prevention including early detection, warning and alerts; reducing vegetation; ensuring defensible space around homes, neighborhoods and critical infrastructure; and improving disaster evacuation routes/procedures; shall the Marin Wildfire Prevention Measure, levying up to 10\u00a2 per building square foot tax ($75 per multifamily unit or as described in the full measure) for ten years, providing $19,300,000 annually, with annual inflation adjustments, independent citizen oversight/audits, and low-income senior exemptions, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2996, "fingerprint": "2020|202000028|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000028|MARIN", "content_hash": "35e6bb3e032a586d", "measure_id": "202000028", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure amending the San Geronimo Valley Community Plan and the Marin County Development Code to require voter approval for any change in the primary golf course use of the San Geronimo Valley Golf Course property, and requiring that the County prepare economic and environmental analyses of the proposed change, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42271, "no_votes": 65448, "total_votes": 107719, "percent_yes": 39.2419164678469, "percent_no": 60.7580835321531, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required voter approval and economic/environmental an...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required voter approval and economic/environmental analyses before changing the primary golf course use of the San Geronimo Valley Golf Course property, achieved by amending the local community plan and development code.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.828621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.382034", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure amending the San Geronimo Valley Community Plan and the Marin County Development Code to require voter approval for any change in the primary golf course use of the San Geronimo Valley Golf Course property, and requiring that the County prepare economic and environmental analyses of the proposed change, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3001, "fingerprint": "2020|202000242|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000242|MARIN", "content_hash": "77a704c75936bfdb", "measure_id": "202000242", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue adjusting its appropriation limit for the annual fire protection and emergency medical services levy, pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, for the period of 7/01/2020 through 6/30/2024? The levy for FY 2020-2021 shall not exceed the rate authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code. (The current levy is $832 per residential dwelling unit, $948 per occupancy in commercial structures, and $167 per vacant parcel.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 810, "no_votes": 215, "total_votes": 1025, "percent_yes": 79.02439024390245, "percent_no": 20.975609756097555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of Belvedere to continue adjusting its spend...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of Belvedere to continue adjusting its spending limit to accommodate a special levy for fire protection and emergency medical services from July 2020 through June 2024. The levy rates are set at $832 per residential unit, $948 per commercial occupancy, and $167 per vacant parcel for fiscal year 2020-2021.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.830164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.382948", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue adjusting its appropriation limit for the annual fire protection and emergency medical services levy, pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, for the period of 7/01/2020 through 6/30/2024? The levy for FY 2020-2021 shall not exceed the rate authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code. (The current levy is $832 per residential dwelling unit, $948 per occupancy in commercial structures, and $167 per vacant parcel.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3000, "fingerprint": "2020|202000243|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000243|MARIN", "content_hash": "24588bc266e1ae15", "measure_id": "202000243", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative which amends the Town of Ross Municipal Code related to issuance of use permits to increase the allowable enrollment of any public or private school from three hundred and twenty (320) to four hundred and twenty (420) students, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 719, "no_votes": 477, "total_votes": 1196, "percent_yes": 60.11705685618729, "percent_no": 39.88294314381271, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative amended the Town of Ross Municipal Code to increase the maxim...", "summary_text": "This initiative amended the Town of Ross Municipal Code to increase the maximum allowable enrollment for public or private schools from 320 to 420 students when issuing use permits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.829863", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.382769", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative which amends the Town of Ross Municipal Code related to issuance of use permits to increase the allowable enrollment of any public or private school from three hundred and twenty (320) to four hundred and twenty (420) students, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2999, "fingerprint": "2020|202000030|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000030|MARIN", "content_hash": "de54c1983e4ad169", "measure_id": "202000030", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the four fiscal years 2020-2021 through 2023-2024 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for Park, Open Space and Street Landscape Maintenance services previously approved by the voters in November, 2015?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1657, "no_votes": 554, "total_votes": 2211, "percent_yes": 74.94346449570331, "percent_no": 25.05653550429669, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases the Marinwood Community Services District's spending l...", "summary_text": "This measure increases the Marinwood Community Services District's spending limit for fiscal years 2020-2021 through 2023-2024 by the amount of revenue generated from a special tax for park, open space, and street landscape maintenance that voters approved in 2015. The increase allows the district to spend the special tax revenue without violating constitutional appropriations limits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.829596", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.382586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the four fiscal years 2020-2021 through 2023-2024 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for Park, Open Space and Street Landscape Maintenance services previously approved by the voters in November, 2015?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 2998, "fingerprint": "2020|202000031|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000031|MARIN", "content_hash": "adff156028c6fb32", "measure_id": "202000031", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the four fiscal years 2020-2021 through 2023-2024 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for Fire Protection and Emergency Response services previously approved by the voters in November, 2011?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1670, "no_votes": 528, "total_votes": 2198, "percent_yes": 75.97816196542311, "percent_no": 24.021838034576888, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increases the Marinwood Community Services District's spending l...", "summary_text": "This measure increases the Marinwood Community Services District's spending limit for fiscal years 2020-2021 through 2023-2024 by the amount of revenue generated from a voter-approved fire protection and emergency response special tax from 2011. The increase allows the district to spend the fire tax revenue without being constrained by constitutional appropriations limits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.829322", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.382405", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the four fiscal years 2020-2021 through 2023-2024 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for Fire Protection and Emergency Response services previously approved by the voters in November, 2011?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3007, "fingerprint": "2020|202000547|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000547|MARIN", "content_hash": "1e446499dc4adc6b", "measure_id": "202000547", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure quality education in local schools with stable local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Shoreline Unified School District\u2019s measure to enhance science, technology, engineering, and math programs; maintain art and music programs; provide specialized reading and writing programs, and attract and retain qualified teachers; be adopted, renewing the current $212 per parcel rate without any increase, raising $1,000,000 annually, for 8 years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight, and all funds benefiting local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1695, "no_votes": 366, "total_votes": 2061, "percent_yes": 82.24163027656476, "percent_no": 17.758369723435237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed Shoreline Unified School District's existing $212 annual...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed Shoreline Unified School District's existing $212 annual parcel tax for 8 years without any increase, generating approximately $1 million annually for educational programs including STEM, arts, music, and literacy instruction. The measure includes senior citizen exemptions and independent oversight requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.832088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.384071", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure quality education in local schools with stable local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Shoreline Unified School District\u2019s measure to enhance science, technology, engineering, and math programs; maintain art and music programs; provide specialized reading and writing programs, and attract and retain qualified teachers; be adopted, renewing the current $212 per parcel rate without any increase, raising $1,000,000 annually, for 8 years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight, and all funds benefiting local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3008, "fingerprint": "2020|202000548|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000548|MARIN", "content_hash": "a5c5276914d4966c", "measure_id": "202000548", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renew $16,800,000 in expiring annual funding and prevent deep cuts by continuing locally controlled school funding the state cannot take away, shall Tamalpais Union High School District maintain excellent hands-on science, technology, engineering, math, reading and writing instruction; attract/retain highly qualified teachers; and support music/art; by adopting a measure renewing the current $469 annual per parcel rate for 9 years, with senior exemptions, cost of living adjustments, and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51822, "no_votes": 18564, "total_votes": 70386, "percent_yes": 73.6254368766516, "percent_no": 26.374563123348395, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed a $469 annual parcel tax for the Tamalpais Union High Sc...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed a $469 annual parcel tax for the Tamalpais Union High School District for 9 years to maintain $16.8 million in annual funding for educational programs including STEM, language arts, arts, and teacher retention. The measure included exemptions for seniors, cost of living adjustments, and independent oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.832363", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.384263", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew $16,800,000 in expiring annual funding and prevent deep cuts by continuing locally controlled school funding the state cannot take away, shall Tamalpais Union High School District maintain excellent hands-on science, technology, engineering, math, reading and writing instruction; attract/retain highly qualified teachers; and support music/art; by adopting a measure renewing the current $469 annual per parcel rate for 9 years, with senior exemptions, cost of living adjustments, and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3006, "fingerprint": "2020|202000546|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000546|MARIN", "content_hash": "74606e8fa95f9ed2", "measure_id": "202000546", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace older portable classrooms; construct new and modernize existing classrooms; upgrade libraries, science labs/ support facilities; make essential safety and security improvements; keep schools safe, clean and well-maintained; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, equipment, sites/ facilities; shall Sausalito Marin City School District\u2019s measure authorizing $41,600,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value ($2,500,000 annually)while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, and all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5024, "no_votes": 1781, "total_votes": 6805, "percent_yes": 73.82806759735489, "percent_no": 26.171932402645112, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Sausalito Marin City School District to issue $41...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Sausalito Marin City School District to issue $41,600,000 in bonds to replace portable classrooms, construct and modernize facilities, upgrade libraries and science labs, and make safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $2.5 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.831810", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.383881", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace older portable classrooms; construct new and modernize existing classrooms; upgrade libraries, science labs/ support facilities; make essential safety and security improvements; keep schools safe, clean and well-maintained; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, equipment, sites/ facilities; shall Sausalito Marin City School District\u2019s measure authorizing $41,600,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value ($2,500,000 annually)while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, and all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3002, "fingerprint": "2020|202000244|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000244|MARIN", "content_hash": "aecc6b92ca7ba63d", "measure_id": "202000244", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue funding, for Novato only, that cannot be taken by Sacramento, for general city services including, but not limited to: local COVID-19 crisis relief/recovery; neighborhood police patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response; repairing potholes/streets; supporting business community recovery; disaster response; shall an ordinance increasing the City of Novato\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax by 2% (paid only by hotel/lodging guests), until ended by voters, providing an additional $400,000 annually, with citizens' oversight, independent audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20473, "no_votes": 6343, "total_votes": 26816, "percent_yes": 76.34621121718376, "percent_no": 23.653788782816235, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Novato's transient occupancy tax by 2 percentage point...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Novato's transient occupancy tax by 2 percentage points, to be paid by hotel and lodging guests, generating an estimated $400,000 annually for general city services. The tax increase has no set expiration date but can be ended by voters in a future election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.830580", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.383130", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding, for Novato only, that cannot be taken by Sacramento, for general city services including, but not limited to: local COVID-19 crisis relief/recovery; neighborhood police patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response; repairing potholes/streets; supporting business community recovery; disaster response; shall an ordinance increasing the City of Novato\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax by 2% (paid only by hotel/lodging guests), until ended by voters, providing an additional $400,000 annually, with citizens' oversight, independent audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3003, "fingerprint": "2020|202000245|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000245|MARIN", "content_hash": "8077b00b7cfeca25", "measure_id": "202000245", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve essential city services with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including disaster/health emergency preparedness, repairing potholes/city streets, maintaining 911 emergency response times, city parks/playgrounds, crime prevention, preserving local services/programs for youth, families, seniors, homeless, and other city services, shall the City of San Rafael measure increasing the local sales tax rate by \u00bc%, for 9 years, providing $3,400,000 per year, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16216, "no_votes": 10085, "total_votes": 26301, "percent_yes": 61.65545036310407, "percent_no": 38.34454963689593, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased San Rafael's local sales tax rate by 0", "summary_text": "This measure increased San Rafael's local sales tax rate by 0.25% for 9 years to generate approximately $3.4 million annually for city services including emergency preparedness, street repairs, parks maintenance, and social programs. The measure passed with 61.7% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.830867", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.383321", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve essential city services with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including disaster/health emergency preparedness, repairing potholes/city streets, maintaining 911 emergency response times, city parks/playgrounds, crime prevention, preserving local services/programs for youth, families, seniors, homeless, and other city services, shall the City of San Rafael measure increasing the local sales tax rate by \u00bc%, for 9 years, providing $3,400,000 per year, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3013, "fingerprint": "2020|202000550|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000550|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "90eb5014831c526b", "measure_id": "202000550", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of Ukiah Unified schools; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health and safety improvements; and modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Ukiah Unified School District issue $75,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $4,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5995, "no_votes": 4876, "total_votes": 10871, "percent_yes": 55.14672063287646, "percent_no": 44.85327936712354, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Ukiah Unified School District to issue $75 millio...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Ukiah Unified School District to issue $75 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including roof repairs, health and safety upgrades, and classroom and restroom modernization. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 5 cents per $100 of assessed value and include provisions for annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.833788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.385183", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of Ukiah Unified schools; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health and safety improvements; and modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Ukiah Unified School District issue $75,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $4,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3012, "fingerprint": "2020|202000549|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000549|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "5f5e5a0c8d883312", "measure_id": "202000549", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair or replace leaky roofs; update inadequate electrical systems; make health and safety improvements; and modernize/renovate and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Fort Bragg Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $35,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $2,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries/operations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3003, "no_votes": 2347, "total_votes": 5350, "percent_yes": 56.13084112149532, "percent_no": 43.86915887850468, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Fort Bragg Unified School District to issue $35 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Fort Bragg Unified School District to issue $35 million in bonds to repair roofs, update electrical systems, make health and safety improvements, and modernize or construct classrooms and school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $2 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.833512", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.384994", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair or replace leaky roofs; update inadequate electrical systems; make health and safety improvements; and modernize/renovate and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Fort Bragg Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $35,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $2,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries/operations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3010, "fingerprint": "2020|202000033|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000033|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "0beaf4f372323cd9", "measure_id": "202000033", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Mendocino County Code Chapter 5.20 be amended to authorize collection of a transient occupancy tax on short-term visitor accommodations of 30 days or less in private campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, estimated to raise $1,000,000 annually? The transient occupancy tax has a rate of ten percent (10%) and is effective until repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11604, "no_votes": 8454, "total_votes": 20058, "percent_yes": 57.852228537242, "percent_no": 42.147771462758, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Mendocino County Code to authorize a 10% transient occup...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Mendocino County Code to authorize a 10% transient occupancy tax on short-term stays of 30 days or less at private campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks. The tax was estimated to generate $1 million annually and remains effective until repealed.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.832900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.384634", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Mendocino County Code Chapter 5.20 be amended to authorize collection of a transient occupancy tax on short-term visitor accommodations of 30 days or less in private campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, estimated to raise $1,000,000 annually? The transient occupancy tax has a rate of ten percent (10%) and is effective until repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3009, "fingerprint": "2020|202000032|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000032|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "a901f892f849aaf9", "measure_id": "202000032", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Mendocino County amends Chapter 5.20 to extend the Transient Occupancy Tax to private campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, should the additional funds from the extended tax be used to fund the recognized fire agencies in Mendocino County as follows: 75% distributed evenly to the recognized Mendocino County; and 25% spent based on the recommendation of the fire chiefs of the recognized fire agencies in Mendocino County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13688, "no_votes": 6108, "total_votes": 19796, "percent_yes": 69.14528187512629, "percent_no": 30.854718124873713, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked voters whether additional revenue from extending ...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked voters whether additional revenue from extending the Transient Occupancy Tax to private campgrounds and RV parks should be allocated to fire agencies, with 75% distributed evenly among recognized fire agencies and 25% allocated based on fire chiefs' recommendations.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.832634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.384449", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Mendocino County amends Chapter 5.20 to extend the Transient Occupancy Tax to private campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, should the additional funds from the extended tax be used to fund the recognized fire agencies in Mendocino County as follows: 75% distributed evenly to the recognized Mendocino County; and 25% spent based on the recommendation of the fire chiefs of the recognized fire agencies in Mendocino County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3014, "fingerprint": "2020|202000551|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000551|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "ea79f16dd08b7bd9", "measure_id": "202000551", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to: Repair aging classrooms and school facilities, Fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating/cooling, and electric systems, Improve student safety and security, Upgrade, acquire, construct, and equip classrooms, labs and facilities supporting college and career readiness, Shall the Willits Unified School District measure authorizing $17 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, with estimated levies of 4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (approximately $900,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2281, "no_votes": 1881, "total_votes": 4162, "percent_yes": 54.80538202787122, "percent_no": 45.19461797212878, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Willits Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Willits Unified School District to issue $17 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, roofs, plumbing, heating/cooling systems, and safety features. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 4 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.834063", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.385378", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to: Repair aging classrooms and school facilities, Fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating/cooling, and electric systems, Improve student safety and security, Upgrade, acquire, construct, and equip classrooms, labs and facilities supporting college and career readiness, Shall the Willits Unified School District measure authorizing $17 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, with estimated levies of 4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (approximately $900,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3015, "fingerprint": "2020|202000552|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000552|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "0482c013d9d972fd", "measure_id": "202000552", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to: 1) Repair aging classrooms and school facilities; 2) Fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating/cooling, and electric systems; 3) Improve student safety and security; 4) Upgrade, acquire, construct, and equip classrooms, labs and facilities supporting college and career readiness; Shall the Willits Unified School District measure authorizing $17 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, with estimated levies of 4 cents per $100 assessed value (approximately $950,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, audits, and money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3742, "no_votes": 2491, "total_votes": 6233, "percent_yes": 60.035296005133965, "percent_no": 39.964703994866035, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Willits Unified School District to issue $17 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Willits Unified School District to issue $17 million in bonds to repair aging school facilities, fix deteriorating building systems, improve safety and security, and upgrade classrooms and labs. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 4 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.834378", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.385563", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to: 1) Repair aging classrooms and school facilities; 2) Fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating/cooling, and electric systems; 3) Improve student safety and security; 4) Upgrade, acquire, construct, and equip classrooms, labs and facilities supporting college and career readiness; Shall the Willits Unified School District measure authorizing $17 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, with estimated levies of 4 cents per $100 assessed value (approximately $950,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, audits, and money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3011, "fingerprint": "2020|202000246|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000246|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "e02b1dbece4de5c8", "measure_id": "202000246", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Willits enact a 3/4 cent sales tax, providing $1,000,000 annually for 10 years, to prevent the elimination of police services; street and sports field maintenance; closing of city facilities; and loss of other essential city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1308, "no_votes": 701, "total_votes": 2009, "percent_yes": 65.10701841712294, "percent_no": 34.892981582877056, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.75% sales tax in Willits, California, expected to generate $1 million annually for 10 years to fund police services, street and sports field maintenance, city facilities, and other municipal services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.833166", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.384814", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Willits enact a 3/4 cent sales tax, providing $1,000,000 annually for 10 years, to prevent the elimination of police services; street and sports field maintenance; closing of city facilities; and loss of other essential city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3023, "fingerprint": "2020|202000556|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000556|MERCED", "content_hash": "dfa0d3e02edbb5ce", "measure_id": "202000556", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade job training/instructional classrooms, science/computer labs; improve student safety, emergency communication/security systems, shall Merced Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $247,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25/$100,000 assessed valuation ($14,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, requiring audits/citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, all funds used locally to improve opportunities for veterans, remove asbestos/lead paint and acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18800, "no_votes": 21120, "total_votes": 39920, "percent_yes": 47.09418837675351, "percent_no": 52.90581162324649, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Merced Community College District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Merced Community College District to issue $247 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms and labs, improve safety systems, remove hazardous materials, and construct or repair facilities and equipment. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.836663", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.387048", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade job training/instructional classrooms, science/computer labs; improve student safety, emergency communication/security systems, shall Merced Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $247,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $25/$100,000 assessed valuation ($14,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, requiring audits/citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, all funds used locally to improve opportunities for veterans, remove asbestos/lead paint and acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3017, "fingerprint": "2020|202000248|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000248|MERCED", "content_hash": "c701ff3063607683", "measure_id": "202000248", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to amend the Merced City Charter to impose a four year term for Mayor be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8693, "no_votes": 4632, "total_votes": 13325, "percent_yes": 65.23827392120076, "percent_no": 34.76172607879924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Merced City Charter to establish a four-year term fo...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Merced City Charter to establish a four-year term for the Mayor position. The amendment was approved by voters in 2020.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.834955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.385932", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to amend the Merced City Charter to impose a four year term for Mayor be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3018, "fingerprint": "2020|202000249|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000249|MERCED", "content_hash": "2c2815109a8dafa8", "measure_id": "202000249", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to amend the Merced City Charter to establish a Citizens' Stipend Setting Commission to set, recommend, and limit the maximum stipend the City Council, including the Mayor, may adopt and receive be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8382, "no_votes": 4873, "total_votes": 13255, "percent_yes": 63.23651452282157, "percent_no": 36.76348547717843, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Merced City Charter to create a Citizens' Stipend Se...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Merced City Charter to create a Citizens' Stipend Setting Commission that would set and limit the maximum stipend amounts for City Council members and the Mayor. The commission would have authority to recommend stipend levels that the City Council could adopt but not exceed.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.835218", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.386112", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to amend the Merced City Charter to establish a Citizens' Stipend Setting Commission to set, recommend, and limit the maximum stipend the City Council, including the Mayor, may adopt and receive be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3019, "fingerprint": "2020|202000250|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000250|MERCED", "content_hash": "bf1403b190705cfd", "measure_id": "202000250", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to amend the Merced City Charter to impose budget and reporting requirements by the Finance Officer to the City Council be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10766, "no_votes": 2556, "total_votes": 13322, "percent_yes": 80.8136916378922, "percent_no": 19.186308362107795, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Merced City Charter to require the Finance Officer t...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Merced City Charter to require the Finance Officer to provide specific budget and reporting information to the City Council. The amendment established formal requirements for financial documentation and reporting processes between the Finance Officer and Council.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.835487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.386292", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to amend the Merced City Charter to impose budget and reporting requirements by the Finance Officer to the City Council be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3016, "fingerprint": "2020|202000247|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000247|MERCED", "content_hash": "326e43c0c3f1a18c", "measure_id": "202000247", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent cuts to public safety services/neighborhood police patrols, and improve crime investigation/emergency response, by replacing overcrowded, aging/deteriorating police/fire facilities; upgrading outdated firefighting equipment; and redistributing stations throughout Atwater, shall the City of Atwater adopt a measure renewing at the 1\u00a2 rate its existing, voter-approved sales tax, providing approximately $4,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, oversight, all funds only for Atwater?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3130, "no_votes": 2124, "total_votes": 5254, "percent_yes": 59.57365816520747, "percent_no": 40.42634183479253, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would renew Atwater's existing 1-cent sales tax to fund public s...", "summary_text": "This measure would renew Atwater's existing 1-cent sales tax to fund public safety improvements including replacing police and fire facilities, upgrading firefighting equipment, and redistributing stations, generating approximately $4 million annually until terminated by voters. The measure failed despite receiving 59.6% support, indicating it required a higher threshold for passage.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.834685", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.385747", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent cuts to public safety services/neighborhood police patrols, and improve crime investigation/emergency response, by replacing overcrowded, aging/deteriorating police/fire facilities; upgrading outdated firefighting equipment; and redistributing stations throughout Atwater, shall the City of Atwater adopt a measure renewing at the 1\u00a2 rate its existing, voter-approved sales tax, providing approximately $4,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, oversight, all funds only for Atwater?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3020, "fingerprint": "2020|202000553|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000553|MERCED", "content_hash": "59dcb3e0bec9a21a", "measure_id": "202000553", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a multi-purpose room and gym for school and community use; and update and modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall El Nido Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $3,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $201,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 101, "no_votes": 61, "total_votes": 162, "percent_yes": 62.34567901234568, "percent_no": 37.65432098765432, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the El Nido Elementary School District to issue $3", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the El Nido Elementary School District to issue $3.4 million in bonds to construct a multi-purpose room and gymnasium, and to update and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.835766", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.386477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a multi-purpose room and gym for school and community use; and update and modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall El Nido Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $3,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $201,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3021, "fingerprint": "2020|202000554|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000554|MERCED", "content_hash": "da6d19bdf141b4ae", "measure_id": "202000554", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and construct facilities, classrooms and restrooms; and make health, safety and accessibility upgrades and improvements; shall El Nido Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $3,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $201,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 93, "no_votes": 66, "total_votes": 159, "percent_yes": 58.490566037735846, "percent_no": 41.509433962264154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the El Nido Elementary School District to issue $3", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the El Nido Elementary School District to issue $3.4 million in bonds to modernize and construct school facilities, classrooms, and restrooms, and make health, safety and accessibility improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating around $201,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.836071", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.386667", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and construct facilities, classrooms and restrooms; and make health, safety and accessibility upgrades and improvements; shall El Nido Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $3,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $201,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3022, "fingerprint": "2020|202000555|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000555|MERCED", "content_hash": "0283201bd677ea89", "measure_id": "202000555", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of Le Grand High without increasing the estimated tax rate; upgrade/expand the Ag Career Technical Education Facilities to better serve students; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Le Grand Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $6,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $573,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 571, "no_votes": 489, "total_votes": 1060, "percent_yes": 53.86792452830189, "percent_no": 46.13207547169811, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Le Grand Union High School District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Le Grand Union High School District to issue $6 million in bonds to upgrade agricultural career technical education facilities and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities at Le Grand High School. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes of approximately 2.9 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.836380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.386857", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of Le Grand High without increasing the estimated tax rate; upgrade/expand the Ag Career Technical Education Facilities to better serve students; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Le Grand Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $6,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $573,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3024, "fingerprint": "2020|202000557|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000557|MERCED", "content_hash": "f625f89add7b6e14", "measure_id": "202000557", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of Le Grand High without increasing the estimated tax rate; upgrade/expand the Ag Career Technical Education Facilities to better serve students; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Le Grand Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $6,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $533,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1308, "no_votes": 705, "total_votes": 2013, "percent_yes": 64.97764530551416, "percent_no": 35.02235469448584, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Le Grand Union High School District to issue $6,0...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Le Grand Union High School District to issue $6,000,000 in bonds to upgrade and expand agricultural career technical education facilities, modernize classrooms and restrooms, and improve school facilities at Le Grand High School. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 2.9 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $533,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.836965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.387237", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of Le Grand High without increasing the estimated tax rate; upgrade/expand the Ag Career Technical Education Facilities to better serve students; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Le Grand Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $6,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $533,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3025, "fingerprint": "2020|202000558|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000558|MONO", "content_hash": "f351b73fd18579c7", "measure_id": "202000558", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain adequate funding and high quality academic programs for all Mammoth Unified schools for the purpose of preserving smaller classes, attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers, strengthening core curriculum, and enhancing technology, art, music, math, science and athletics, shall Mammoth Unified School District extend the current $59 annual education parcel tax for five years with exemptions for senior citizens' primary residences and overseen by an independent citizen's oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3019, "no_votes": 1066, "total_votes": 4085, "percent_yes": 73.90452876376989, "percent_no": 26.09547123623011, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended Mammoth Unified School District's existing $59 annual p...", "summary_text": "This measure extended Mammoth Unified School District's existing $59 annual parcel tax for an additional five years to fund educational programs and services. The tax includes exemptions for senior citizens' primary residences and requires oversight by an independent citizen committee.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.837262", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.387473", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain adequate funding and high quality academic programs for all Mammoth Unified schools for the purpose of preserving smaller classes, attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers, strengthening core curriculum, and enhancing technology, art, music, math, science and athletics, shall Mammoth Unified School District extend the current $59 annual education parcel tax for five years with exemptions for senior citizens' primary residences and overseen by an independent citizen's oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3040, "fingerprint": "2020|202000561|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000561|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b98845101a3827a6", "measure_id": "202000561", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and campus security, upgrade emergency notification systems, replace aging portable classrooms and repair restrooms and playgrounds at Del Rey Elementary, Santa Lucia Elementary, Chalone Peaks Middle, King City Arts Magnet School and King City Early Education Center, shall the measure by King City Union School District to issue $19,325,000 of bonds with legal rates, levies averaging less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation for 34 years (generating $960,000/year), annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 978, "no_votes": 776, "total_votes": 1754, "percent_yes": 55.75826681870011, "percent_no": 44.24173318129989, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the King City Union School District to issue $19", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the King City Union School District to issue $19.3 million in bonds to fund safety improvements, emergency system upgrades, replacement of portable classrooms, and repairs to restrooms and playgrounds across five schools. The bonds will be repaid through property taxes averaging less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation over 34 years.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.841692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.390269", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and campus security, upgrade emergency notification systems, replace aging portable classrooms and repair restrooms and playgrounds at Del Rey Elementary, Santa Lucia Elementary, Chalone Peaks Middle, King City Arts Magnet School and King City Early Education Center, shall the measure by King City Union School District to issue $19,325,000 of bonds with legal rates, levies averaging less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation for 34 years (generating $960,000/year), annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3041, "fingerprint": "2020|202000562|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000562|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c75b3a5ce0f12b4f", "measure_id": "202000562", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize aging classrooms and facilities including leaking roofs, outdated plumbing and electrical wiring, build new classrooms and upgrade classroom technology at Del Rey Elementary, Santa Lucia Elementary, Chalone Peaks Middle, King City Arts Magnet School and King City Early Education Center, shall the measure by King City Union School District to issue $18,975,000 of bonds with legal rates, levies averaging less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation for 34 years (generating $950,000/year), annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1004, "no_votes": 775, "total_votes": 1779, "percent_yes": 56.43620011242271, "percent_no": 43.56379988757729, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the King City Union School District to issue $18,975,...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the King City Union School District to issue $18,975,000 in bonds to renovate and modernize facilities at five schools, including fixing infrastructure problems and upgrading technology. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation over 34 years.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.841967", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.390459", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize aging classrooms and facilities including leaking roofs, outdated plumbing and electrical wiring, build new classrooms and upgrade classroom technology at Del Rey Elementary, Santa Lucia Elementary, Chalone Peaks Middle, King City Arts Magnet School and King City Early Education Center, shall the measure by King City Union School District to issue $18,975,000 of bonds with legal rates, levies averaging less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation for 34 years (generating $950,000/year), annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3027, "fingerprint": "2020|202000251|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000251|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "84f4bafb6e6c0825", "measure_id": "202000251", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance to increase the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea\u2019s current 1% sales tax to 1.5% to generate an estimated $4.5 million per year for 20 years to enhance the City\u2019s green infrastructure of parks, trails, beaches and trees; invest in community facilities and spaces; maintain public safety and emergency preparation; fund capital needs; address pension liabilities and provide general City services, with all funds staying local, and with an annual independent audit, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 983, "no_votes": 641, "total_votes": 1624, "percent_yes": 60.52955665024631, "percent_no": 39.47044334975369, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure increased Carmel-by-the-Sea's sales tax from 1% to 1", "summary_text": "This ballot measure increased Carmel-by-the-Sea's sales tax from 1% to 1.5% for 20 years to generate approximately $4.5 million annually for parks, trails, beaches, trees, community facilities, public safety, capital projects, pension obligations, and general city services. The measure requires annual independent audits and keeps all revenue within the local community.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.837824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.387848", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance to increase the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea\u2019s current 1% sales tax to 1.5% to generate an estimated $4.5 million per year for 20 years to enhance the City\u2019s green infrastructure of parks, trails, beaches and trees; invest in community facilities and spaces; maintain public safety and emergency preparation; fund capital needs; address pension liabilities and provide general City services, with all funds staying local, and with an annual independent audit, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3042, "fingerprint": "2020|202000563|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000563|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "8863da1c98421d7b", "measure_id": "202000563", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace outdated plumbing/electrical systems, upgrade fire alarms and emergency communication systems; repair/replace roofs and modernize classrooms at schools throughout the district, shall the Pacific Grove Unified School District measure authorizing $30 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, yearly levies of less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2039 (generating an average of $2.1 million dollars per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no estimated increase in current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5155, "no_votes": 2436, "total_votes": 7591, "percent_yes": 67.90936635489395, "percent_no": 32.09063364510605, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Pacific Grove Unified School District to issue $3...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Pacific Grove Unified School District to issue $30 million in bonds to fund infrastructure improvements including plumbing, electrical systems, fire alarms, roofs, and classroom modernization. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2039.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.842234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.390645", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace outdated plumbing/electrical systems, upgrade fire alarms and emergency communication systems; repair/replace roofs and modernize classrooms at schools throughout the district, shall the Pacific Grove Unified School District measure authorizing $30 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, yearly levies of less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2039 (generating an average of $2.1 million dollars per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no estimated increase in current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3043, "fingerprint": "2020|202000564|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000564|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "58e80a5bddcb3a00", "measure_id": "202000564", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To allow Soledad\u2019s teachers and staff to live in the community in which they work and improve the school district\u2019s ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees by constructing teacher-staff rental housing, shall the Soledad Unified School District measure authorizing $11.5 million of bonds be adopted with legal interest rates raising approximately $750,000 for annual repayment through approximately 2049, projected levies of less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1192, "no_votes": 1031, "total_votes": 2223, "percent_yes": 53.62123256860099, "percent_no": 46.37876743139901, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Soledad Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Soledad Unified School District to issue $11.5 million in bonds to construct rental housing for teachers and staff, funded through property tax levies of less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation with repayment extending to approximately 2049. The measure failed despite receiving 53.6% yes votes, likely falling short of the required supermajority threshold for bond measures.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.842714", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.390833", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To allow Soledad\u2019s teachers and staff to live in the community in which they work and improve the school district\u2019s ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees by constructing teacher-staff rental housing, shall the Soledad Unified School District measure authorizing $11.5 million of bonds be adopted with legal interest rates raising approximately $750,000 for annual repayment through approximately 2049, projected levies of less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3028, "fingerprint": "2020|202000252|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000252|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7a6cc273fac48172", "measure_id": "202000252", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve essential city services and facilities in Del Rey Oaks, including crime prevention, emergency response, repair of streets and sidewalks, and other city services, shall a measure be adopted to extend indefinitely the existing one percent (1%) transactions and use tax that provides approximately $600,000 annually in revenue to be used only in Del Rey Oaks, the proceeds of said tax to be utilized for general governmental purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 499, "no_votes": 198, "total_votes": 697, "percent_yes": 71.59253945480631, "percent_no": 28.407460545193686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended indefinitely an existing 1% sales tax in Del Rey Oaks t...", "summary_text": "This measure extended indefinitely an existing 1% sales tax in Del Rey Oaks that generates approximately $600,000 annually for general city services including public safety, emergency response, and infrastructure maintenance. The tax revenue can only be used within Del Rey Oaks for general governmental purposes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.838092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.388037", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve essential city services and facilities in Del Rey Oaks, including crime prevention, emergency response, repair of streets and sidewalks, and other city services, shall a measure be adopted to extend indefinitely the existing one percent (1%) transactions and use tax that provides approximately $600,000 annually in revenue to be used only in Del Rey Oaks, the proceeds of said tax to be utilized for general governmental purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3034, "fingerprint": "2020|202000253|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000253|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7fc189da1fbcbba9", "measure_id": "202000253", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to protect the City of Monterey\u2019s financial stability and maintain services such as police; fire; 9-1-1 emergency response; traffic management; library; senior/youth recreation programs; beach, park, forestry, and trail maintenance; housing programs, and other unrestricted general fund expenditures, by enacting a \u00bd-cent per dollar sales tax for nine years, with all funds locally controlled, and all expenditures subject to independent audit, providing approximately $5,000,000 annually, be adopted.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5488, "no_votes": 3164, "total_votes": 8652, "percent_yes": 63.43042071197411, "percent_no": 36.56957928802589, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.5% sales tax in Monterey for nine years to generate approximately $5 million annually for general city services including police, fire, emergency response, parks, libraries, and other municipal operations. The funds are subject to independent auditing and remain under local control.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.839838", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.389150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to protect the City of Monterey\u2019s financial stability and maintain services such as police; fire; 9-1-1 emergency response; traffic management; library; senior/youth recreation programs; beach, park, forestry, and trail maintenance; housing programs, and other unrestricted general fund expenditures, by enacting a \u00bd-cent per dollar sales tax for nine years, with all funds locally controlled, and all expenditures subject to independent audit, providing approximately $5,000,000 annually, be adopted.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3049, "fingerprint": "2020|202000569|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000569|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d2c6b51f3d80e218", "measure_id": "202000569", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "With no projected increase in current tax rates, shall Shandon Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure to repair deteriorating septic systems, improve student safety, upgrade technology and provide additional classrooms by authorizing $4 million in bonds be adopted with legal rates, levies averaging less than $0.04 per $100 of assessed valuation through 2048 (generating $260,000 per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no funds used for administrators\u2019 salaries or benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48, "no_votes": 37, "total_votes": 85, "percent_yes": 56.47058823529412, "percent_no": 43.52941176470588, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Shandon Joint Unified School District to issue $4...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Shandon Joint Unified School District to issue $4 million in bonds to repair septic systems, improve safety, upgrade technology, and add classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging less than $0.04 per $100 of assessed valuation through 2048.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.844939", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.391964", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "With no projected increase in current tax rates, shall Shandon Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure to repair deteriorating septic systems, improve student safety, upgrade technology and provide additional classrooms by authorizing $4 million in bonds be adopted with legal rates, levies averaging less than $0.04 per $100 of assessed valuation through 2048 (generating $260,000 per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no funds used for administrators\u2019 salaries or benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3048, "fingerprint": "2020|202000568|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000568|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "ad9b06a038f2bd3f", "measure_id": "202000568", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "With no increase in estimated tax rates, shall San Miguel Joint Union School District\u2019s measure to retrofit classrooms for agricultural sciences, student safety and school security; upgrade emergency preparedness; and increase student access to internet/technology at Lillian Larsen and Cappy Culver Schools be adopted, authorizing $6,200,000 in bonds, extending but not increasing current rates (3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation through 2039) and raising $580,000/ year for bond repayment with legal interest rates, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9, "no_votes": 11, "total_votes": 20, "percent_yes": 45.0, "percent_no": 55.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized $6,200,000 in bonds for the San Miguel Joi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized $6,200,000 in bonds for the San Miguel Joint Union School District to retrofit classrooms for agricultural sciences, upgrade safety and emergency preparedness systems, and improve internet and technology access at two schools. The bonds would have extended existing tax rates of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation through 2039 without increasing the current rate.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.844628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.391776", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "With no increase in estimated tax rates, shall San Miguel Joint Union School District\u2019s measure to retrofit classrooms for agricultural sciences, student safety and school security; upgrade emergency preparedness; and increase student access to internet/technology at Lillian Larsen and Cappy Culver Schools be adopted, authorizing $6,200,000 in bonds, extending but not increasing current rates (3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation through 2039) and raising $580,000/ year for bond repayment with legal interest rates, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3045, "fingerprint": "2020|202000566|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000566|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "08401a2d0351d50e", "measure_id": "202000566", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a new elementary school to relieve student overcrowding; upgrade school fire alarms and emergency preparations; improve handicap accessibility (ADA); upgrade technology and student internet access; and replace aging roofs, plumbing and wiring at La Gloria Elementary School and Fairview Middle School shall Gonzales Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $24.5 million in bonds be adopted with payments less than 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation (raising $1.5 million per year through 2049), legal rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2096, "no_votes": 1332, "total_votes": 3428, "percent_yes": 61.14352392065344, "percent_no": 38.85647607934656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized Gonzales Unified School District to issue $24", "summary_text": "The measure authorized Gonzales Unified School District to issue $24.5 million in bonds to build a new elementary school, upgrade fire alarms and emergency systems, improve ADA accessibility, enhance technology infrastructure, and replace aging infrastructure at La Gloria Elementary and Fairview Middle School. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at less than 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $1.5 million annually through 2049.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.843263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.391206", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a new elementary school to relieve student overcrowding; upgrade school fire alarms and emergency preparations; improve handicap accessibility (ADA); upgrade technology and student internet access; and replace aging roofs, plumbing and wiring at La Gloria Elementary School and Fairview Middle School shall Gonzales Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $24.5 million in bonds be adopted with payments less than 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation (raising $1.5 million per year through 2049), legal rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3031, "fingerprint": "2020|202000260|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000260|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d5a2cedbf58f379b", "measure_id": "202000260", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Pacific Grove Municipal Code be amended to increase the City of Pacific Grove\u2019s current 1% sales tax to 1.5% as a general tax beginning January 1, 2021 to generate a long-term yield estimated at $1,000,000 annually, to fund capital needs; maintain public safety and emergency preparation; enhance the City\u2019s infrastructure of parks, trails, beaches and trees; invest in community facilities and spaces; and provide general local City services, with all revenues requiring an annual independent audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5368, "no_votes": 3603, "total_votes": 8971, "percent_yes": 59.83725337197637, "percent_no": 40.16274662802363, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Pacific Grove's sales tax from 1% to 1", "summary_text": "This measure increased Pacific Grove's sales tax from 1% to 1.5% beginning January 1, 2021, generating an estimated $1 million annually as general revenue for the city. The funds can be used for capital needs, public safety, infrastructure maintenance, community facilities, and general city services, with revenues subject to annual independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.838974", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.388581", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pacific Grove Municipal Code be amended to increase the City of Pacific Grove\u2019s current 1% sales tax to 1.5% as a general tax beginning January 1, 2021 to generate a long-term yield estimated at $1,000,000 annually, to fund capital needs; maintain public safety and emergency preparation; enhance the City\u2019s infrastructure of parks, trails, beaches and trees; invest in community facilities and spaces; and provide general local City services, with all revenues requiring an annual independent audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3038, "fingerprint": "2020|202000559|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000559|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c054ba28a5194697", "measure_id": "202000559", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize classrooms and facilities; undertake seismic and earthquake safety upgrades and repairs; and qualify for state matching funds, shall the measure to reauthorize $4.2 million of Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s bonds, previously approved by voters in 2010, as new bonds with legal rates, projected yearly average levies less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2031 (generating an average $455,000 dollars per year), annual audits and taxpayer oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 550, "no_votes": 434, "total_votes": 984, "percent_yes": 55.89430894308944, "percent_no": 44.10569105691056, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reauthorized $4", "summary_text": "This measure reauthorized $4.2 million in school bonds for the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to fund classroom repairs, facility modernization, and seismic safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2031.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.840997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.389888", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize classrooms and facilities; undertake seismic and earthquake safety upgrades and repairs; and qualify for state matching funds, shall the measure to reauthorize $4.2 million of Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s bonds, previously approved by voters in 2010, as new bonds with legal rates, projected yearly average levies less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2031 (generating an average $455,000 dollars per year), annual audits and taxpayer oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3050, "fingerprint": "2020|202000570|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000570|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d994f609f9a42ea3", "measure_id": "202000570", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase and improve student access to modern technology including computers, wiring and educational software and to enhance Soledad\u2019s ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees by constructing local teacher-staff rental housing, shall Soledad Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $13.75 million of bonds be adopted (raising approximately $863,487 for annual repayment through 2049) with average levies less than $26 per $100,000 assessed valuation, legal interest rates, annual audits, independent oversight and all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3328, "no_votes": 1966, "total_votes": 5294, "percent_yes": 62.86361919153759, "percent_no": 37.13638080846241, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized Soledad Unified School District to issue $13", "summary_text": "The measure authorized Soledad Unified School District to issue $13.75 million in bonds to fund technology improvements including computers and educational software, and to construct rental housing for teachers and staff. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging less than $26 per $100,000 of assessed valuation annually through 2049.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.845303", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.392150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase and improve student access to modern technology including computers, wiring and educational software and to enhance Soledad\u2019s ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees by constructing local teacher-staff rental housing, shall Soledad Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $13.75 million of bonds be adopted (raising approximately $863,487 for annual repayment through 2049) with average levies less than $26 per $100,000 assessed valuation, legal interest rates, annual audits, independent oversight and all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3044, "fingerprint": "2020|202000565|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000565|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "fb759e72bb4cec1e", "measure_id": "202000565", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student safety and school security, repair classrooms and facilities including wiring, plumbing and roofs; construct new classrooms; and qualify for state matching funds shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $30.5 million of bonds with legal rates, yearly projected average levies less than $0.051 /$100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating an average $2 million dollars per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no projected increase in current tax rates be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 844, "no_votes": 675, "total_votes": 1519, "percent_yes": 55.562870309414095, "percent_no": 44.437129690585905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue $30", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue $30.5 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, construct new classrooms, and qualify for state matching funds. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes with projected annual levies of less than $0.051 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.842991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.391018", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student safety and school security, repair classrooms and facilities including wiring, plumbing and roofs; construct new classrooms; and qualify for state matching funds shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $30.5 million of bonds with legal rates, yearly projected average levies less than $0.051 /$100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating an average $2 million dollars per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no projected increase in current tax rates be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3036, "fingerprint": "2020|202000256|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000256|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f297527c3848ed1a", "measure_id": "202000256", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the City of King commercial cannabis tax to include a new tax of up to 5% of gross receipts on the retail sale of cannabis and cannabis products, including industrial hemp and hemp products, and up to 2% of gross receipts on the distribution of cannabis and cannabis products generated from outside King City, which is projected to generate approximately $150,000 annually, and will be in effect until terminated by the voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1701, "no_votes": 781, "total_votes": 2482, "percent_yes": 68.5334407735697, "percent_no": 31.466559226430306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended King City's commercial cannabis tax to add a new tax of ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended King City's commercial cannabis tax to add a new tax of up to 5% on retail cannabis sales and up to 2% on distribution of cannabis from outside the city. The tax was projected to generate approximately $150,000 annually and remains in effect until terminated by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.840426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.389529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the City of King commercial cannabis tax to include a new tax of up to 5% of gross receipts on the retail sale of cannabis and cannabis products, including industrial hemp and hemp products, and up to 2% of gross receipts on the distribution of cannabis and cannabis products generated from outside King City, which is projected to generate approximately $150,000 annually, and will be in effect until terminated by the voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3026, "fingerprint": "2020|202000257|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000257|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "1046c4e04675dbd9", "measure_id": "202000257", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect the City of Marina from development in current open space areas north of the City limits and along its coast, and to encourage efficient development in central Marina and within Marina's portion of former Fort Ord, shall an ordinance be adopted extending the expiration date of the Marina Urban Growth Boundary Initiative to December 31, 2040?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7530, "no_votes": 1805, "total_votes": 9335, "percent_yes": 80.66416711301552, "percent_no": 19.335832886984477, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends the Marina Urban Growth Boundary Initiative until Decemb...", "summary_text": "This measure extends the Marina Urban Growth Boundary Initiative until December 31, 2040, which restricts development in open space areas north of the city and along the coast while directing growth toward central Marina and the former Fort Ord area.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.837550", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.387665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the City of Marina from development in current open space areas north of the City limits and along its coast, and to encourage efficient development in central Marina and within Marina's portion of former Fort Ord, shall an ordinance be adopted extending the expiration date of the Marina Urban Growth Boundary Initiative to December 31, 2040?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3039, "fingerprint": "2020|202000560|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000560|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a69b0603731f3d55", "measure_id": "202000560", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by modernizing aging classrooms, technology/science labs; upgrading outdated wiring/ sewer lines; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $274,100,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $19/$100,000 assessed valuation ($17,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, with audits, no funding for administrators, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1198, "no_votes": 1385, "total_votes": 2583, "percent_yes": 46.38017808749516, "percent_no": 53.61982191250484, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Cabrillo Community College District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Cabrillo Community College District to issue $274,100,000 in bonds to repair and upgrade classrooms, technology and science labs, and infrastructure including wiring and sewer lines. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of $19 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.841386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.390080", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by modernizing aging classrooms, technology/science labs; upgrading outdated wiring/ sewer lines; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $274,100,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $19/$100,000 assessed valuation ($17,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, with audits, no funding for administrators, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3033, "fingerprint": "2020|202000262|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000262|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d0f2dce5b17da6f5", "measure_id": "202000262", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide local services, such as low-cost youth recreation programs and facilities, arts and science programs, senior programs and services, animal welfare programs and services, daycare and other general City services, shall a measure to enact a one-half percent (.5%) increase to the Soledad Transaction and Use Tax, generating $900,000 per year annually until ended by voters, reviewed by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, with annual independent audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3145, "no_votes": 1974, "total_votes": 5119, "percent_yes": 61.43778081656573, "percent_no": 38.56221918343427, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.5% increase to Soledad's transaction and use tax to fund local services including youth recreation, arts and science programs, senior services, animal welfare, daycare, and other general city services. The tax generates approximately $900,000 annually and includes provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.839518", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.388952", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide local services, such as low-cost youth recreation programs and facilities, arts and science programs, senior programs and services, animal welfare programs and services, daycare and other general City services, shall a measure to enact a one-half percent (.5%) increase to the Soledad Transaction and Use Tax, generating $900,000 per year annually until ended by voters, reviewed by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, with annual independent audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3029, "fingerprint": "2020|202000255|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000255|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a60690b13499ba0c", "measure_id": "202000255", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Measure to continue enhancing the health, safety and welfare of Greenfield, and providing greater general City services, such as strengthened public safety; increased youth recreation programs; re-establishment of code enforcement services; and other essential services, be re-adopted extending a voter approved 0.75 cent sales tax for a period of six (6) years raising $1,100,000.00 annually, subject to annual audits and public review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2209, "no_votes": 1446, "total_votes": 3655, "percent_yes": 60.437756497948016, "percent_no": 39.562243502051984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure re-adopted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure re-adopted a 0.75 cent sales tax in Greenfield for six years, expected to raise $1.1 million annually for general city services including public safety, youth recreation programs, and code enforcement. The measure passed with 60.4% voter approval and includes provisions for annual audits and public review.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.838402", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.388217", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Measure to continue enhancing the health, safety and welfare of Greenfield, and providing greater general City services, such as strengthened public safety; increased youth recreation programs; re-establishment of code enforcement services; and other essential services, be re-adopted extending a voter approved 0.75 cent sales tax for a period of six (6) years raising $1,100,000.00 annually, subject to annual audits and public review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3032, "fingerprint": "2020|202000261|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000261|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "653e92f06c14aad6", "measure_id": "202000261", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the rate of a transactions and use tax from one percent (1%) to one and one-half percent (1.5%) on the retail sale of goods in Sand City to generate and estimated $1,000,000 per year with no termination date to be used to provide general City services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84, "no_votes": 101, "total_votes": 185, "percent_yes": 45.40540540540541, "percent_no": 54.59459459459459, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased Sand City's sales tax rate from 1% to 1", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased Sand City's sales tax rate from 1% to 1.5% to generate an estimated $1,000,000 annually for general city services with no expiration date.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.839243", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.388772", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the rate of a transactions and use tax from one percent (1%) to one and one-half percent (1.5%) on the retail sale of goods in Sand City to generate and estimated $1,000,000 per year with no termination date to be used to provide general City services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3046, "fingerprint": "2020|202000567|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000567|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c1507caecea783ed", "measure_id": "202000567", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms, career training facilities, deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems; remove hazardous materials; improve instructional technology; acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment improving student/veteran access to affordable, high-quality training in math, science, engineering, technology, shall Monterey Peninsula Community College District's measure authorizing $230,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.8\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation, $12,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40199, "no_votes": 23997, "total_votes": 64196, "percent_yes": 62.61916630319646, "percent_no": 37.38083369680354, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Monterey Peninsula Community College District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Monterey Peninsula Community College District to issue $230 million in bonds to repair and upgrade aging facilities, improve technology, and construct new educational facilities. The bonds would be funded through a property tax of 1.8 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $12.9 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.843739", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.391395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms, career training facilities, deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems; remove hazardous materials; improve instructional technology; acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment improving student/veteran access to affordable, high-quality training in math, science, engineering, technology, shall Monterey Peninsula Community College District's measure authorizing $230,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.8\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation, $12,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3047, "fingerprint": "2020|202000458|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000458|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a2e0ae74415b8ec4", "measure_id": "202000458", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade neighborhood schools, attract/retain quality teachers by repairing deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms, roof; upgrading classrooms/science labs, school security, fire safety; removing hazardous materials; providing safe drinking water, career/college training; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, shall Salinas Union High School District\u2019s measure authorizing $140,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30/$100,000 assessed value ($9,900,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring annual independent audits/citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35666, "no_votes": 20869, "total_votes": 56535, "percent_yes": 63.08658353232512, "percent_no": 36.91341646767488, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Salinas Union High School District to issue $140 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Salinas Union High School District to issue $140 million in bonds to fund school facility repairs, upgrades, and construction including classrooms, labs, safety systems, and infrastructure improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.844306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.391585", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade neighborhood schools, attract/retain quality teachers by repairing deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms, roof; upgrading classrooms/science labs, school security, fire safety; removing hazardous materials; providing safe drinking water, career/college training; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, shall Salinas Union High School District\u2019s measure authorizing $140,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30/$100,000 assessed value ($9,900,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring annual independent audits/citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3035, "fingerprint": "2020|202000254|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000254|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "8b4e67f9c2f3341e", "measure_id": "202000254", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure to increase the Gonzales Temporary Transactions and Use Tax from one-half percent (0.5%) to one percent (1.0%), and extend the life of the tax by twenty years, subject to continued independent audit and citizen\u2019s oversight committee review, with all funds dedicated exclusively to Gonzales programs, projects and initiatives, be adopted? The tax amendment would generate an estimated additional $600,000 annually.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1315, "no_votes": 1169, "total_votes": 2484, "percent_yes": 52.93880837359099, "percent_no": 47.06119162640901, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure doubled Gonzales' temporary transactions and use tax from 0", "summary_text": "This measure doubled Gonzales' temporary transactions and use tax from 0.5% to 1.0% and extended it for twenty years, with funds dedicated to city programs and projects under independent audit and citizen oversight. The tax increase was estimated to generate an additional $600,000 annually for the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.840151", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.389340", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure to increase the Gonzales Temporary Transactions and Use Tax from one-half percent (0.5%) to one percent (1.0%), and extend the life of the tax by twenty years, subject to continued independent audit and citizen\u2019s oversight committee review, with all funds dedicated exclusively to Gonzales programs, projects and initiatives, be adopted? The tax amendment would generate an estimated additional $600,000 annually.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3030, "fingerprint": "2020|202000259|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000259|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7751135a89039b7a", "measure_id": "202000259", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure be adopted to increase transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 10% to 12% on the cost of rooms paid by hotel guests, with 16% of proceeds allocated to the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program, and 84% to essential services such as parks, recreation, library, emergency response, facility rehabilitation, and other unrestricted expenditures, and expanding the tax to apply to online travel companies, providing $2.8 to $5.6 million annually, effective until repealed by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9659, "no_votes": 3812, "total_votes": 13471, "percent_yes": 71.70217504268427, "percent_no": 28.297824957315726, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Monterey's transient occupancy tax from 10% to 12% on ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Monterey's transient occupancy tax from 10% to 12% on hotel room costs and expanded it to apply to online travel companies. The revenue, estimated at $2.8 to $5.6 million annually, is allocated with 16% going to neighborhood and community improvement programs and 84% to essential city services including parks, recreation, libraries, and emergency response.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.838704", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.388400", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure be adopted to increase transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 10% to 12% on the cost of rooms paid by hotel guests, with 16% of proceeds allocated to the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program, and 84% to essential services such as parks, recreation, library, emergency response, facility rehabilitation, and other unrestricted expenditures, and expanding the tax to apply to online travel companies, providing $2.8 to $5.6 million annually, effective until repealed by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3037, "fingerprint": "2020|202000258|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000258|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "be7efea2ba62101c", "measure_id": "202000258", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance revising the City of Marina's regulations and permit process for commercial cannabis businesses and land uses, while restricting the proximity of such businesses to public parks and recreation centers and retaining the existing 5% gross receipts tax on cannabis businesses, the existing cap on retail businesses at 3 adult-use retailers and 3 medical dispensaries, and the existing prohibition against recreational sales to persons under 21 years old be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6604, "no_votes": 3591, "total_votes": 10195, "percent_yes": 64.776851397744, "percent_no": 35.223148602256, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure revised Marina's regulations and permit process for commercial ca...", "summary_text": "The measure revised Marina's regulations and permit process for commercial cannabis businesses while maintaining existing restrictions including a 5% gross receipts tax, a cap of 3 adult-use retailers and 3 medical dispensaries, proximity restrictions near parks and recreation centers, and the prohibition on recreational sales to those under 21.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.840691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.389709", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance revising the City of Marina's regulations and permit process for commercial cannabis businesses and land uses, while restricting the proximity of such businesses to public parks and recreation centers and retaining the existing 5% gross receipts tax on cannabis businesses, the existing cap on retail businesses at 3 adult-use retailers and 3 medical dispensaries, and the existing prohibition against recreational sales to persons under 21 years old be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3052, "fingerprint": "2020|202000263|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000263|NAPA", "content_hash": "82908dabe7c01381", "measure_id": "202000263", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of St. Helena prohibit hotel/motel (as defined in Section 17.04.160 of the Municipal Code, as it may be amended) development on the 5.6 acres of public land at the corner of Library Lane and Adams Street (Napa County Assessor's Parcel Number 009-150-006, adjacent to the library and commonly referred to as the Adams Street property) for at least 20 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1558, "no_votes": 1500, "total_votes": 3058, "percent_yes": 50.94833224329627, "percent_no": 49.05166775670373, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the City of St", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the City of St. Helena should prohibit hotel/motel development on 5.6 acres of public land at the corner of Library Lane and Adams Street for at least 20 years. The measure passed with 50.9% of the vote, expressing voter support for restricting hotel development on the specified property.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.845987", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.392543", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of St. Helena prohibit hotel/motel (as defined in Section 17.04.160 of the Municipal Code, as it may be amended) development on the 5.6 acres of public land at the corner of Library Lane and Adams Street (Napa County Assessor's Parcel Number 009-150-006, adjacent to the library and commonly referred to as the Adams Street property) for at least 20 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3051, "fingerprint": "2020|202000034|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000034|NAPA", "content_hash": "9bb75072a19f64d7", "measure_id": "202000034", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect drinking water by preserving and restoring watersheds, rivers, creeks; protect natural open spaces and wildlife habitat; reduce wildfire risk; and maintain local parks and trails; shall Napa County enact a 1/4 percent sales tax for the Napa County Regional Park and Open Space District raising an estimated nine million dollars annually for fifteen years with citizen oversight, annual audits, and funds that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28667, "no_votes": 16778, "total_votes": 45445, "percent_yes": 63.080646935856535, "percent_no": 36.919353064143465, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have enacted a 0.25% sales tax for 15 years to fund the Napa County Regional Park and Open Space District for watershed protection, open space preservation, wildfire risk reduction, and park maintenance, generating an estimated $9 million annually. The measure failed despite receiving 63.1% support, likely requiring a two-thirds supermajority for passage.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.845690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.392344", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect drinking water by preserving and restoring watersheds, rivers, creeks; protect natural open spaces and wildlife habitat; reduce wildfire risk; and maintain local parks and trails; shall Napa County enact a 1/4 percent sales tax for the Napa County Regional Park and Open Space District raising an estimated nine million dollars annually for fifteen years with citizen oversight, annual audits, and funds that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3053, "fingerprint": "2020|202000264|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000264|NAPA", "content_hash": "8136426770b4bbe6", "measure_id": "202000264", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure authorizing the Town Council to approve one cannabis retail business allowing retail sale, delivery, and/or on-site consumption of adult-use cannabis in the Town of Yountville excluding residential zones, allowing the Town to establish regulations and fees, requiring a use permit and conditions to operate, and permitting the Town Council to establish an ongoing general tax up to 3% on the business\u2019 gross receipts to raise an estimated $30,000 to $100,000 annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 551, "no_votes": 1102, "total_votes": 1653, "percent_yes": 33.33333333333333, "percent_no": 66.66666666666667, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Yountville's Town Council to approve one c...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Yountville's Town Council to approve one cannabis retail business for adult-use sales, delivery, and on-site consumption outside residential zones, with required permits and conditions. It would have also allowed the Town Council to impose a general tax of up to 3% on the business's gross receipts, estimated to generate $30,000 to $100,000 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.846318", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.392733", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure authorizing the Town Council to approve one cannabis retail business allowing retail sale, delivery, and/or on-site consumption of adult-use cannabis in the Town of Yountville excluding residential zones, allowing the Town to establish regulations and fees, requiring a use permit and conditions to operate, and permitting the Town Council to establish an ongoing general tax up to 3% on the business\u2019 gross receipts to raise an estimated $30,000 to $100,000 annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3059, "fingerprint": "2020|202000571|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000571|NEVADA", "content_hash": "5ab435baf4834d2f", "measure_id": "202000571", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and replace old buildings/infrastructure, including classrooms, restrooms, roofs, dry-rot, grounds, electrical and sewer systems; provide safe drinking water; and improve student health, safety, security and access; shall Penn Valley Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure to issue $16 million in bonds at legal rates with projected levies of $28.65 per $100,000 assessed value, raising an average $935,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, and requiring ALL funds be spent on Williams Ranch and Ready Springs AND citizens\u2019 oversight/audits be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2501, "no_votes": 3528, "total_votes": 6029, "percent_yes": 41.4828329739592, "percent_no": 58.5171670260408, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Penn Valley Union Elementary School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Penn Valley Union Elementary School District to issue $16 million in bonds to repair and replace school buildings and infrastructure, including classrooms, restrooms, electrical systems, and other facilities at Williams Ranch and Ready Springs schools. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments of approximately $28.65 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.848190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.393828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and replace old buildings/infrastructure, including classrooms, restrooms, roofs, dry-rot, grounds, electrical and sewer systems; provide safe drinking water; and improve student health, safety, security and access; shall Penn Valley Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure to issue $16 million in bonds at legal rates with projected levies of $28.65 per $100,000 assessed value, raising an average $935,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, and requiring ALL funds be spent on Williams Ranch and Ready Springs AND citizens\u2019 oversight/audits be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3058, "fingerprint": "2020|202000269|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000269|NEVADA", "content_hash": "d2d7c9d6ac5de8ec", "measure_id": "202000269", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure which, without increasing taxes on Truckee residents, increases by 2% the Town of Truckee's transient occupancy tax paid by hotel/short-term rental guests, generating approximately $700,000 annually for 20 years for general services such as providing housing that is affordable for workers needed to sustain Truckee's economy, preserving natural open space, and preparing Truckee for wildfires and other natural disasters, with independent audits and all funds spent in Truckee, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8199, "no_votes": 1505, "total_votes": 9704, "percent_yes": 84.49093157460841, "percent_no": 15.50906842539159, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increases Truckee's transient occupancy tax on hotel and short-te...", "summary_text": "The measure increases Truckee's transient occupancy tax on hotel and short-term rental guests by 2%, generating approximately $700,000 annually for 20 years. The funds are designated for general services including affordable worker housing, open space preservation, and natural disaster preparedness.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.847870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.393641", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure which, without increasing taxes on Truckee residents, increases by 2% the Town of Truckee's transient occupancy tax paid by hotel/short-term rental guests, generating approximately $700,000 annually for 20 years for general services such as providing housing that is affordable for workers needed to sustain Truckee's economy, preserving natural open space, and preparing Truckee for wildfires and other natural disasters, with independent audits and all funds spent in Truckee, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3054, "fingerprint": "2020|202000267|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000267|NEVADA", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "202000267", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1279, "no_votes": 708, "total_votes": 1987, "percent_yes": 64.36839456467037, "percent_no": 35.63160543532963, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer in Nevada...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer in Nevada, California from elected offices to appointed positions. The measure passed, allowing the city council to appoint these officials rather than having them chosen through elections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.846688", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.392920", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3057, "fingerprint": "2020|202000268|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000268|NEVADA", "content_hash": "74ab6c1d78773594", "measure_id": "202000268", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure that, exclusively for the purpose of improving and maintaining Nevada City's streets, sidewalks, pathways, drainage, water distribution and sewer collection systems, allows the City of Nevada City to continue to impose and collect, as it has since 2006, a one-half cent per one-dollar retail transactions and use tax (sales tax), providing approximately $550,000 annually until repealed by the voters, and monitored by a citizens' oversight committee, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1837, "no_votes": 253, "total_votes": 2090, "percent_yes": 87.89473684210526, "percent_no": 12.10526315789474, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows Nevada City to continue collecting a 0", "summary_text": "This measure allows Nevada City to continue collecting a 0.5% sales tax that has been in place since 2006, generating approximately $550,000 annually for street, sidewalk, pathway, drainage, water, and sewer system improvements and maintenance. The tax will continue until voters decide to repeal it and will be overseen by a citizens' oversight committee.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.847581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.393462", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure that, exclusively for the purpose of improving and maintaining Nevada City's streets, sidewalks, pathways, drainage, water distribution and sewer collection systems, allows the City of Nevada City to continue to impose and collect, as it has since 2006, a one-half cent per one-dollar retail transactions and use tax (sales tax), providing approximately $550,000 annually until repealed by the voters, and monitored by a citizens' oversight committee, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3056, "fingerprint": "2020|202000266|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000266|NEVADA", "content_hash": "0f15940d632f17ca", "measure_id": "202000266", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance funding essential public safety services, recreation, streets, parks and other general City services by imposing a yearly cannabis (marijuana) business license tax of up to $7.00 a square foot of commercial grow area, 8% of retail receipts and 6% of other receipts, with an additional tax on highly potent products, to last until amended by voters generating approximately $250,000 a year with all funds staying local and subject to audit, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3879, "no_votes": 2583, "total_votes": 6462, "percent_yes": 60.02785515320335, "percent_no": 39.97214484679665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure imposed a yearly cannabis business license tax in Nevada, Califor...", "summary_text": "The measure imposed a yearly cannabis business license tax in Nevada, California, with rates of up to $7 per square foot for grow areas, 8% on retail receipts, and 6% on other receipts, plus an additional tax on highly potent products. The tax was expected to generate approximately $250,000 annually for public safety services, recreation, streets, parks, and other general city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.847287", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.393280", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance funding essential public safety services, recreation, streets, parks and other general City services by imposing a yearly cannabis (marijuana) business license tax of up to $7.00 a square foot of commercial grow area, 8% of retail receipts and 6% of other receipts, with an additional tax on highly potent products, to last until amended by voters generating approximately $250,000 a year with all funds staying local and subject to audit, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3055, "fingerprint": "2020|202000265|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000265|NEVADA", "content_hash": "e9b16010c7e4b288", "measure_id": "202000265", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to fund continued necessary road and culvert maintenance by the BLCSD replace the current tax assessment with an annual assessment tax of $300 per parcel per year to raise $19,200 per year, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44, "no_votes": 36, "total_votes": 80, "percent_yes": 55.00000000000001, "percent_no": 44.99999999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have replaced the current tax assessment with a $300 annual...", "summary_text": "The measure would have replaced the current tax assessment with a $300 annual assessment per parcel to raise $19,200 yearly for road and culvert maintenance by the BLCSD. The assessment failed despite receiving 55% support, likely requiring a two-thirds majority for passage.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.846998", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.393100", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to fund continued necessary road and culvert maintenance by the BLCSD replace the current tax assessment with an annual assessment tax of $300 per parcel per year to raise $19,200 per year, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3064, "fingerprint": "2020|202000270|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000270|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9738138504ef6f62", "measure_id": "202000270", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Kimberly Ho be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7284, "no_votes": 9790, "total_votes": 17074, "percent_yes": 42.66135644840108, "percent_no": 57.33864355159892, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have removed Kimberly Ho from her position as a City Counc...", "summary_text": "This measure would have removed Kimberly Ho from her position as a City Council Member in Orange, California. The recall effort failed with 42.7% of voters supporting her removal.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-04-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.849732", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.394757", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Kimberly Ho be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3065, "fingerprint": "2020|202000271|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000271|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2a566a700debeb99", "measure_id": "202000271", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chi Charlie Nguyen be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7224, "no_votes": 9847, "total_votes": 17071, "percent_yes": 42.31738035264483, "percent_no": 57.68261964735517, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have recalled (removed) Chi Charlie Nguyen from his positi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have recalled (removed) Chi Charlie Nguyen from his position as a City Council Member in Orange, California. The recall failed with 42.3% of voters supporting removal.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-04-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.850017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.394939", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chi Charlie Nguyen be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3066, "fingerprint": "2020|202000272|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000272|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0ed7269341a2dcdc", "measure_id": "202000272", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Tri Ta be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6970, "no_votes": 10165, "total_votes": 17135, "percent_yes": 40.67697694776773, "percent_no": 59.32302305223227, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Tri Ta from the o...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Tri Ta from the office of Mayor of Orange, California. The recall failed with 40.7% of voters supporting the removal.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-04-07", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.850423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.395121", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Tri Ta be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3067, "fingerprint": "2020|202000273|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000273|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f48d897f5ae1edf4", "measure_id": "202000273", "measure_letter": "6", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Cecilia Iglesias be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member for Ward 6?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11876, "no_votes": 9475, "total_votes": 21351, "percent_yes": 55.62268746194557, "percent_no": 44.37731253805443, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would recall Cecilia Iglesias from her position as City Council M...", "summary_text": "The measure would recall Cecilia Iglesias from her position as City Council Member for Ward 6 in Orange, California. The recall passed, resulting in her removal from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-05-19", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.850709", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.395299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Cecilia Iglesias be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member for Ward 6?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3060, "fingerprint": "2020|202000035|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000035|ORANGE", "content_hash": "45aebb29b1b3764b", "measure_id": "202000035", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter for the County of Orange be amended to require a two-thirds vote of the total Board of Supervisors membership to propose taxes for approval by voters at an election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 593548, "no_votes": 163430, "total_votes": 756978, "percent_yes": 78.41020478798592, "percent_no": 21.58979521201408, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires a two-thirds majority vote (4 out of 5 member...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires a two-thirds majority vote (4 out of 5 members) of the Orange County Board of Supervisors to propose any tax measures for voter consideration at elections. Previously, a simple majority of the Board could place tax proposals on the ballot.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.848562", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.394018", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter for the County of Orange be amended to require a two-thirds vote of the total Board of Supervisors membership to propose taxes for approval by voters at an election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3063, "fingerprint": "2020|202000283|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000283|ORANGE", "content_hash": "382e71b65743e2d0", "measure_id": "202000283", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 11188, approved by the Orange City Council, to amend the General Plan with respect to the approximately 109.2 acre property located at 6145 E. Santiago Canyon Road, which currently allows for a mixture of sand and gravel operation/processing, residential, open space, and other uses, to allow for the Trails at Santiago Creek project, consisting of 128 single-family homes on approximately 40.7 acres and designating approximately 68.5 acres for open space, creek restoration, and public multi-use recreation trails, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23290, "no_votes": 39877, "total_votes": 63167, "percent_yes": 36.87051783367898, "percent_no": 63.12948216632102, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended Orange's General Plan to allow development of ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended Orange's General Plan to allow development of the Trails at Santiago Creek project on 109.2 acres at 6145 E. Santiago Canyon Road, replacing current sand and gravel operations with 128 single-family homes on 40.7 acres and designating 68.5 acres for open space, creek restoration, and public trails.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.849448", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.394572", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 11188, approved by the Orange City Council, to amend the General Plan with respect to the approximately 109.2 acre property located at 6145 E. Santiago Canyon Road, which currently allows for a mixture of sand and gravel operation/processing, residential, open space, and other uses, to allow for the Trails at Santiago Creek project, consisting of 128 single-family homes on approximately 40.7 acres and designating approximately 68.5 acres for open space, creek restoration, and public multi-use recreation trails, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3078, "fingerprint": "2020|202000572|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000572|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ba558b4ab9ccb024", "measure_id": "202000572", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the measure to repair, construct and equip neighborhood schools, classrooms, career, science, computer and technology labs and educational facilities, and make school safety, fire, and drinking water improvements by authorizing the Anaheim Union High School District to issue $398,000,000 in bonds, with interest rates within the legal limit, and a levy estimated at 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation averaging $22,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens oversight and independent audits as required by law, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35011, "no_votes": 31916, "total_votes": 66927, "percent_yes": 52.31222077786245, "percent_no": 47.68777922213755, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Anaheim Union High School District to i...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Anaheim Union High School District to issue $398 million in bonds to repair, construct, and equip school facilities, labs, and make safety improvements, funded by a property tax levy estimated at 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation. The measure failed despite receiving 52.3% yes votes, likely requiring a two-thirds supermajority for passage.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.854111", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.397324", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to repair, construct and equip neighborhood schools, classrooms, career, science, computer and technology labs and educational facilities, and make school safety, fire, and drinking water improvements by authorizing the Anaheim Union High School District to issue $398,000,000 in bonds, with interest rates within the legal limit, and a levy estimated at 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation averaging $22,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens oversight and independent audits as required by law, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3070, "fingerprint": "2020|202000284|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000284|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3fc5bc7f152e463c", "measure_id": "202000284", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted limiting City Council service to two consecutive four-year terms with the ability to again serve as a member of the City Council after being off the City Council for no less than two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28141, "no_votes": 8157, "total_votes": 36298, "percent_yes": 77.527687475894, "percent_no": 22.472312524106, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure limits Orange City Council members to two consecutive four-year ...", "summary_text": "This measure limits Orange City Council members to two consecutive four-year terms, with the ability to serve again after at least two years off the council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.851590", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.395845", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted limiting City Council service to two consecutive four-year terms with the ability to again serve as a member of the City Council after being off the City Council for no less than two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3071, "fingerprint": "2020|202000285|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000285|ORANGE", "content_hash": "269ca8c87bcc943f", "measure_id": "202000285", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Tustin City Code be amended to comply with the Council salary formula provided for by California Government Code Sections 36516 and 36516.5 to ensure that Council salaries are set and strictly limited by such Government Codes, commencing at $600 per month?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23540, "no_votes": 7815, "total_votes": 31355, "percent_yes": 75.07574549513633, "percent_no": 24.92425450486367, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Tustin City Code to set City Council member salaries...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Tustin City Code to set City Council member salaries at $600 per month in compliance with California Government Code requirements. The measure established that council salaries would be strictly limited by the specified state government code sections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.851876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.396024", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Tustin City Code be amended to comply with the Council salary formula provided for by California Government Code Sections 36516 and 36516.5 to ensure that Council salaries are set and strictly limited by such Government Codes, commencing at $600 per month?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3072, "fingerprint": "2020|202000286|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000286|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c99ad5c4a9bc9c4b", "measure_id": "202000286", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that prospectively limits the number of terms a person may serve as Member of the City Council or Mayor, in any combination, to three four-year terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29576, "no_votes": 9031, "total_votes": 38607, "percent_yes": 76.60786903929339, "percent_no": 23.39213096070661, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance establishes term limits for Orange City Council members and th...", "summary_text": "This ordinance establishes term limits for Orange City Council members and the Mayor, restricting any person from serving more than three four-year terms in any combination of these positions. The limits apply prospectively to future service rather than retroactively to current officeholders.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.852269", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.396208", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that prospectively limits the number of terms a person may serve as Member of the City Council or Mayor, in any combination, to three four-year terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3079, "fingerprint": "2020|202000573|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000573|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c7ce89e1d2217cc9", "measure_id": "202000573", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/replace leaky roofs, deteriorating/inadequate plumbing/sewer/electrical systems, improve access to computers/technology; repair/ construct/ acquire/ modernize/ equip classrooms/ labs/ restrooms/ school facilities; and make health/ safety improvements; shall the Brea Olinda Unified School District measure authorizing $123,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 4.9\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (averaging $6,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and no money taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5705, "no_votes": 6694, "total_votes": 12399, "percent_yes": 46.01177514315671, "percent_no": 53.98822485684329, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Brea Olinda Unified School District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Brea Olinda Unified School District to issue $123 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, classrooms, and technology infrastructure. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed property value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.854407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.397516", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/replace leaky roofs, deteriorating/inadequate plumbing/sewer/electrical systems, improve access to computers/technology; repair/ construct/ acquire/ modernize/ equip classrooms/ labs/ restrooms/ school facilities; and make health/ safety improvements; shall the Brea Olinda Unified School District measure authorizing $123,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 4.9\u00a2 per $100 assessed value (averaging $6,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and no money taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3080, "fingerprint": "2020|202000574|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000574|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9181dc098bc696f2", "measure_id": "202000574", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging classrooms and facilities at schools serving San Clemente and Capistrano Beach, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, and upgrade/construct classrooms/labs, and technology to support college and career readiness in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades, shall the Capistrano Unified School District (SFID #2) measure authorizing $120,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($7 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9741, "no_votes": 12318, "total_votes": 22059, "percent_yes": 44.15884672922616, "percent_no": 55.84115327077384, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Capistrano Unified School District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Capistrano Unified School District to issue $120 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, classrooms, and technology infrastructure. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.854698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.397711", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging classrooms and facilities at schools serving San Clemente and Capistrano Beach, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, and upgrade/construct classrooms/labs, and technology to support college and career readiness in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades, shall the Capistrano Unified School District (SFID #2) measure authorizing $120,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($7 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3081, "fingerprint": "2020|202000575|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000575|ORANGE", "content_hash": "296d419c28c306bf", "measure_id": "202000575", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging classrooms and facilities at schools serving Aliso Viejo, Laguna Niguel and Dana Point, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, and upgrade/construct classrooms/labs and technology to support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades, shall the Capistrano Unified School District (SFID #3) measure authorizing $300,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value ($18 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21003, "no_votes": 24888, "total_votes": 45891, "percent_yes": 45.76714388442178, "percent_no": 54.23285611557822, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Capistrano Unified School District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Capistrano Unified School District to issue $300 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and technology infrastructure. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.855090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.397895", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging classrooms and facilities at schools serving Aliso Viejo, Laguna Niguel and Dana Point, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, and upgrade/construct classrooms/labs and technology to support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades, shall the Capistrano Unified School District (SFID #3) measure authorizing $300,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value ($18 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3082, "fingerprint": "2020|202000576|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000576|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d6183b23de0fb707", "measure_id": "202000576", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging classrooms/facilities at Fullerton elementary/middle schools including deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems; improve student safety and security; upgrade, acquire, construct, and equip classrooms, labs, libraries, sites/facilities to support student achievement in science, math, arts, and technology; shall Fullerton Elementary School District's measure authorizing $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($11 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14522, "no_votes": 15476, "total_votes": 29998, "percent_yes": 48.40989399293287, "percent_no": 51.59010600706713, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Fullerton Elementary School District to...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Fullerton Elementary School District to issue $198 million in bonds to repair aging facilities and upgrade classrooms, labs, and libraries, funded by a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value. The bonds would have supported infrastructure improvements including roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and safety upgrades at elementary and middle schools in the district.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.855374", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.398080", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging classrooms/facilities at Fullerton elementary/middle schools including deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems; improve student safety and security; upgrade, acquire, construct, and equip classrooms, labs, libraries, sites/facilities to support student achievement in science, math, arts, and technology; shall Fullerton Elementary School District's measure authorizing $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($11 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3083, "fingerprint": "2020|202000577|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000577|ORANGE", "content_hash": "71e63d21d3a07747", "measure_id": "202000577", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade, construct and equip high school classrooms, science labs, sites and career- training facilities serving Fullerton, Buena Park, and La Habra supporting college/ career readiness in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades, improve campus safety/security, and upgrade roofs/ plumbing/electrical, shall the Fullerton Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3 cents/ $100 assessed value (averaging $20,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25253, "no_votes": 27209, "total_votes": 52462, "percent_yes": 48.13579352674316, "percent_no": 51.86420647325684, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Fullerton Joint Union High School Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Fullerton Joint Union High School District to issue $310 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, science labs, career training facilities, and infrastructure at high schools serving Fullerton, Buena Park, and La Habra. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $20 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.855660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.398265", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade, construct and equip high school classrooms, science labs, sites and career- training facilities serving Fullerton, Buena Park, and La Habra supporting college/ career readiness in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades, improve campus safety/security, and upgrade roofs/ plumbing/electrical, shall the Fullerton Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3 cents/ $100 assessed value (averaging $20,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3085, "fingerprint": "2020|202000579|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000579|ORANGE", "content_hash": "81bed41d26ceb93e", "measure_id": "202000579", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms/labs to improve student and veteran access to affordable, high-quality education and career training in science, technology, engineering, math and skilled trades at Santa Ana College and Santiago Canyon College; repair deteriorating roofs/plumbing/electrical systems; and construct/acquire classrooms/facilities/equipment, shall the Rancho Santiago Community College District measure authorizing $496,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $0.02 per $100 of assessed value ($25,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, independent audits and local control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53927, "no_votes": 50112, "total_votes": 104039, "percent_yes": 51.83344707273234, "percent_no": 48.16655292726766, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Rancho Santiago Community College Dist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Rancho Santiago Community College District to issue $496 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, labs, and infrastructure at Santa Ana College and Santiago Canyon College, funded by a property tax levy of $0.02 per $100 of assessed value. The measure failed despite receiving 51.8% support, as it required a supermajority to pass.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.856272", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.398635", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms/labs to improve student and veteran access to affordable, high-quality education and career training in science, technology, engineering, math and skilled trades at Santa Ana College and Santiago Canyon College; repair deteriorating roofs/plumbing/electrical systems; and construct/acquire classrooms/facilities/equipment, shall the Rancho Santiago Community College District measure authorizing $496,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $0.02 per $100 of assessed value ($25,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, independent audits and local control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3086, "fingerprint": "2020|202000580|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000580|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b53ecd36844bba59", "measure_id": "202000580", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair local schools, classrooms, science labs, career training facilities to support college readiness/career preparation in math, science, engineering, technology, arts and skilled trades, improve safety/security, remove hazardous materials/asbestos, and repair deteriorating roofs/plumbing/electrical systems at older schools, shall the Saddleback Valley Unified School District measure authorizing $495,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($30,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight/ all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27026, "no_votes": 44978, "total_votes": 72004, "percent_yes": 37.53402588745069, "percent_no": 62.46597411254931, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Saddleback Valley Unified School Distr...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Saddleback Valley Unified School District to issue $495 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, labs, safety systems, and infrastructure at older schools. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.856701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.398820", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair local schools, classrooms, science labs, career training facilities to support college readiness/career preparation in math, science, engineering, technology, arts and skilled trades, improve safety/security, remove hazardous materials/asbestos, and repair deteriorating roofs/plumbing/electrical systems at older schools, shall the Saddleback Valley Unified School District measure authorizing $495,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($30,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight/ all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3087, "fingerprint": "2020|202000581|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000581|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b8eb70f0bffa33d9", "measure_id": "202000581", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade inadequate classrooms, labs and school facilities supporting college/career readiness in science, math, technology, engineering, arts; Improve student safety, and upgrade deteriorated roofs, plumbing, sewer, lighting, electrical systems; shall the Tustin Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $215 million in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($12.4 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12541, "no_votes": 10808, "total_votes": 23349, "percent_yes": 53.71107970362756, "percent_no": 46.28892029637244, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Tustin Unified School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Tustin Unified School District to issue $215 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, labs, safety systems, and infrastructure like roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.857095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.399005", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade inadequate classrooms, labs and school facilities supporting college/career readiness in science, math, technology, engineering, arts; Improve student safety, and upgrade deteriorated roofs, plumbing, sewer, lighting, electrical systems; shall the Tustin Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $215 million in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents per $100 assessed value ($12.4 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3084, "fingerprint": "2020|202000578|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000578|ORANGE", "content_hash": "64a10fe94c84bcf9", "measure_id": "202000578", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain consistency and education curriculum for families, students and staff in our local elementary and middle schools with the feeder high school district, and permanently save the District nearly $250,000 annually, shall Lowell Joint School District permanently transfer its current jurisdiction and oversight from Los Angeles County Office of Education to Orange County Department of Education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3021, "no_votes": 637, "total_votes": 3658, "percent_yes": 82.58611262985238, "percent_no": 17.41388737014762, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would permanently transfer the Lowell Joint School District's jur...", "summary_text": "The measure would permanently transfer the Lowell Joint School District's jurisdiction and oversight from the Los Angeles County Office of Education to the Orange County Department of Education. The change was intended to align the elementary and middle school district with its feeder high school district and reduce administrative costs by approximately $250,000 annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.855942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.398449", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain consistency and education curriculum for families, students and staff in our local elementary and middle schools with the feeder high school district, and permanently save the District nearly $250,000 annually, shall Lowell Joint School District permanently transfer its current jurisdiction and oversight from Los Angeles County Office of Education to Orange County Department of Education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3068, "fingerprint": "2020|202000275|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000275|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e49745dc2adb0f62", "measure_id": "202000275", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, amending Cypress\u2019s City Charter to require Council vacancies be filled pursuant to State law; permit changing by ordinance Council composition, election, and terms to comply with State law changes; and, solely pertaining to Cypress\u2019s municipal affairs, change publication completion requirements for ordinances, franchises, public works contracts, and legal notices or other matters to alternatively permit publication by posting at three or more Council designated public places and Cypress\u2019s online presence, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16050, "no_votes": 7155, "total_votes": 23205, "percent_yes": 69.1661279896574, "percent_no": 30.833872010342603, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Cypress's City Charter to require Council vacancies be f...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Cypress's City Charter to require Council vacancies be filled according to state law, allow the Council to change its composition and election procedures by ordinance to comply with state law changes, and permit publication of legal notices through posting at designated public places and online rather than requiring traditional newspaper publication.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.851001", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.395480", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, amending Cypress\u2019s City Charter to require Council vacancies be filled pursuant to State law; permit changing by ordinance Council composition, election, and terms to comply with State law changes; and, solely pertaining to Cypress\u2019s municipal affairs, change publication completion requirements for ordinances, franchises, public works contracts, and legal notices or other matters to alternatively permit publication by posting at three or more Council designated public places and Cypress\u2019s online presence, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3073, "fingerprint": "2020|202000274|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000274|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e0ad6eed4d7f1a6d", "measure_id": "202000274", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance authorizing, regulating, taxing retail sales/deliveries of cannabis; limiting locations of cannabis establishments to protect neighborhoods, schools, children; requiring security; imposing a gross receipts tax of 4% to 7% on retail cannabis businesses until ended by voters; raising approximately $3,000,000 annually for maintaining 911 response, fire/public safety protection, parks, youth/senior services, addressing homelessness, retaining small businesses, other general services; requiring public disclosure, funds controlled locally; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33291, "no_votes": 17793, "total_votes": 51084, "percent_yes": 65.16913319238901, "percent_no": 34.83086680761099, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized retail cannabis sales and deliveries in Orange, Calif...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized retail cannabis sales and deliveries in Orange, California, with location restrictions to protect schools and neighborhoods, and imposed a 4% to 7% gross receipts tax on cannabis businesses. The tax is expected to generate approximately $3 million annually for general city services including public safety, parks, and social services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.852559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.396388", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance authorizing, regulating, taxing retail sales/deliveries of cannabis; limiting locations of cannabis establishments to protect neighborhoods, schools, children; requiring security; imposing a gross receipts tax of 4% to 7% on retail cannabis businesses until ended by voters; raising approximately $3,000,000 annually for maintaining 911 response, fire/public safety protection, parks, youth/senior services, addressing homelessness, retaining small businesses, other general services; requiring public disclosure, funds controlled locally; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3074, "fingerprint": "2020|202000276|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000276|ORANGE", "content_hash": "54274719b8b5e5ad", "measure_id": "202000276", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding to fix local streets/roads, potholes; retain local businesses/jobs; maintain 911 emergency response, fire protection/firefighters, paramedics, public safety services; address homelessness, clean up encampments; keep public areas safe/clean; maintain emergency public health preparedness, paramedic equipment, and other general services; shall the City of Fullerton\u2019s measure establishing a 1.25% sales tax providing approximately $25,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring public disclosure of spending, audits, oversight, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26903, "no_votes": 35901, "total_votes": 62804, "percent_yes": 42.83644353862811, "percent_no": 57.16355646137189, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 1", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 1.25% sales tax in Fullerton, California, generating approximately $25 million annually to fund street repairs, public safety services, homelessness programs, and other general city services. The tax would have remained in effect until repealed by voters and included requirements for public disclosure, audits, and oversight of spending.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.852852", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.396574", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding to fix local streets/roads, potholes; retain local businesses/jobs; maintain 911 emergency response, fire protection/firefighters, paramedics, public safety services; address homelessness, clean up encampments; keep public areas safe/clean; maintain emergency public health preparedness, paramedic equipment, and other general services; shall the City of Fullerton\u2019s measure establishing a 1.25% sales tax providing approximately $25,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring public disclosure of spending, audits, oversight, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3077, "fingerprint": "2020|202000277|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000277|ORANGE", "content_hash": "97ff438d304bde84", "measure_id": "202000277", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance ____ be approved by the voters to amend Chapter 7.26 of the Fullerton Municipal Code to prohibit the sale, possession and use of fireworks in the City of Fullerton?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25276, "no_votes": 37646, "total_votes": 62922, "percent_yes": 40.170369664028485, "percent_no": 59.829630335971515, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended Fullerton Municipal Code to prohibit the sale,...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended Fullerton Municipal Code to prohibit the sale, possession, and use of fireworks within the city limits. The ordinance failed with 40.2% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.853823", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.397136", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance ____ be approved by the voters to amend Chapter 7.26 of the Fullerton Municipal Code to prohibit the sale, possession and use of fireworks in the City of Fullerton?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3062, "fingerprint": "2020|202000280|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000280|ORANGE", "content_hash": "dff989059a8633c8", "measure_id": "202000280", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Laguna Woods allow the establishment and operation of marijuana dispensaries offering the retail sale of medical and non-medical marijuana in commercial zoning districts within the City of Laguna Woods city limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6651, "no_votes": 6426, "total_votes": 13077, "percent_yes": 50.8602890571232, "percent_no": 49.1397109428768, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the City of Laguna Woods should al...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the City of Laguna Woods should allow marijuana dispensaries to operate in commercial zones within city limits, selling both medical and recreational cannabis. The measure passed with 50.9% support, indicating voter approval for allowing such dispensaries in the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.849141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.394388", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Laguna Woods allow the establishment and operation of marijuana dispensaries offering the retail sale of medical and non-medical marijuana in commercial zoning districts within the City of Laguna Woods city limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3075, "fingerprint": "2020|202000279|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000279|ORANGE", "content_hash": "445c3690d682997d", "measure_id": "202000279", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund municipal services including fire protection, 911/emergency medical response, public safety/senior program/ preserve open space/address homelessness/retain small businesses/other general services shall an ordinance authorizing La Habra to impose a gross receipts tax up to 6% on commercial cannabis businesses until ended by voters, authorizing up to four cannabis delivery licenses; raising approximately $1,000,000 - $2,000,000 annually; with financial audits, all funds local, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17726, "no_votes": 8550, "total_votes": 26276, "percent_yes": 67.46080073070483, "percent_no": 32.53919926929517, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the city of La Habra to impose a gross receipts tax o...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the city of La Habra to impose a gross receipts tax of up to 6% on commercial cannabis businesses and allow up to four cannabis delivery licenses, with expected annual revenue of $1-2 million for general municipal services. The tax would remain in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.853138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.396766", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund municipal services including fire protection, 911/emergency medical response, public safety/senior program/ preserve open space/address homelessness/retain small businesses/other general services shall an ordinance authorizing La Habra to impose a gross receipts tax up to 6% on commercial cannabis businesses until ended by voters, authorizing up to four cannabis delivery licenses; raising approximately $1,000,000 - $2,000,000 annually; with financial audits, all funds local, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3061, "fingerprint": "2020|202000278|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000278|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2b016fbcbbb05088", "measure_id": "202000278", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure titled \u201cCitizens\u2019 Initiative for Preservation of Open Space in La Habra\u201d be adopted to amend the La Habra General Plan to require majority voter approval to change property in the City designated as \u201cOpen Space\u201d to another designation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19649, "no_votes": 6535, "total_votes": 26184, "percent_yes": 75.04201038802321, "percent_no": 24.957989611976785, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended La Habra's General Plan to require majority voter approva...", "summary_text": "The measure amended La Habra's General Plan to require majority voter approval before any property designated as \"Open Space\" can be changed to another land use designation. It was designed to preserve existing open space areas by adding a voter approval requirement for future development or rezoning of those properties.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.848854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.394201", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure titled \u201cCitizens\u2019 Initiative for Preservation of Open Space in La Habra\u201d be adopted to amend the La Habra General Plan to require majority voter approval to change property in the City designated as \u201cOpen Space\u201d to another designation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3076, "fingerprint": "2020|202000281|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000281|ORANGE", "content_hash": "974607ed77df61e9", "measure_id": "202000281", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure quality of life services by preserving 911 police response with local control; protect local businesses, maintain local jobs; prevent property crime; protect neighborhood/park police patrols, street maintenance, youth, senior programs, other essential services; protect long-term fiscal sustainability, shall the City of Los Alamitos measure establishing 1.5\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $4,100,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring independent audits, public spending disclosure, ensuring all funds stay in Los Alamitos?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3060, "no_votes": 2946, "total_votes": 6006, "percent_yes": 50.94905094905094, "percent_no": 49.05094905094906, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1.5 cent sales tax in the City of Los Alamitos to generate approximately $4.1 million annually for city services including police, street maintenance, and youth and senior programs. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters and includes requirements for independent audits and public spending disclosure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.853538", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.396947", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure quality of life services by preserving 911 police response with local control; protect local businesses, maintain local jobs; prevent property crime; protect neighborhood/park police patrols, street maintenance, youth, senior programs, other essential services; protect long-term fiscal sustainability, shall the City of Los Alamitos measure establishing 1.5\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $4,100,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring independent audits, public spending disclosure, ensuring all funds stay in Los Alamitos?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3069, "fingerprint": "2020|202000282|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000282|ORANGE", "content_hash": "02b8b7b6faaaed5e", "measure_id": "202000282", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Newport Beach City Charter be amended to add Section 713 to the City Charter, establishing the powers and duties of the Harbor Commission and making the Harbor Commission a City Charter designated Appointive Board and Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26131, "no_votes": 21236, "total_votes": 47367, "percent_yes": 55.16709945742817, "percent_no": 44.83290054257183, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Newport Beach's City Charter to establish the Harbor Com...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Newport Beach's City Charter to establish the Harbor Commission as a charter-designated board with defined powers and duties. The amendment added Section 713 to formally recognize the Harbor Commission's role in city governance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:29", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.851290", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.395665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Newport Beach City Charter be amended to add Section 713 to the City Charter, establishing the powers and duties of the Harbor Commission and making the Harbor Commission a City Charter designated Appointive Board and Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3103, "fingerprint": "2020|202000583|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000583|PLACER", "content_hash": "12814de881dd69e7", "measure_id": "202000583", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade old infrastructure/classrooms/other facilities (including leaky roofs, deteriorating restrooms/electrical systems); improve student/school safety and disability access; update classroom technology; and replace outdated science/computer labs; shall Eureka Union School District's measure authorizing $49,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $28.71 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $2,950,000 annually for local schools while bonds are outstanding, and requiring citizen oversight/audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4696, "no_votes": 6068, "total_votes": 10764, "percent_yes": 43.626904496469706, "percent_no": 56.373095503530294, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Eureka Union School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Eureka Union School District to issue $49 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school infrastructure, classrooms, and facilities, including improvements to safety, disability access, and technology. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of $28.71 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $2.95 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.861964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.401935", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade old infrastructure/classrooms/other facilities (including leaky roofs, deteriorating restrooms/electrical systems); improve student/school safety and disability access; update classroom technology; and replace outdated science/computer labs; shall Eureka Union School District's measure authorizing $49,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $28.71 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $2,950,000 annually for local schools while bonds are outstanding, and requiring citizen oversight/audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3102, "fingerprint": "2020|202000582|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000582|PLACER", "content_hash": "812ba9114d27a38d", "measure_id": "202000582", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Colfax Elementary School; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and make health and safety improvements; shall Colfax Elementary School District's measure be adopted authorizing $4,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $304,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 875, "no_votes": 1052, "total_votes": 1927, "percent_yes": 45.40736896730669, "percent_no": 54.59263103269331, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized $4,700,000 in bonds for the Colfax Element...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized $4,700,000 in bonds for the Colfax Elementary School District to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and facilities, improve technology access, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 2.7 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.861691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.401751", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Colfax Elementary School; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and make health and safety improvements; shall Colfax Elementary School District's measure be adopted authorizing $4,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $304,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3106, "fingerprint": "2020|202000586|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000586|PLACER", "content_hash": "535ed9ad4495c650", "measure_id": "202000586", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7, "no_votes": 37, "total_votes": 44, "percent_yes": 15.909090909090908, "percent_no": 84.0909090909091, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to issue $228.4 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct classrooms and buildings for career and technical education programs across its campuses. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.862826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.402500", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3105, "fingerprint": "2020|202000585|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000585|PLACER", "content_hash": "4f0ba3666f17627f", "measure_id": "202000585", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Lincoln Aquatics / Athletics Complex: Shall the measure to support and enhance student health and curriculum by constructing an aquatics center and athletic fields for community/school use, shall Western Placer Unified School District issue $29,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying an average 1.1\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, generating $1,600,000 Districtwide annually, while bonds are outstanding, with strict accountability including: annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying in the Lincoln community be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7230, "no_votes": 14189, "total_votes": 21419, "percent_yes": 33.7550772678463, "percent_no": 66.2449227321537, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would authorize the Western Placer Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "The measure would authorize the Western Placer Unified School District to issue $29 million in bonds to construct an aquatics center and athletic fields for community and school use in Lincoln. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging 1.1 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $1.6 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.862557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.402305", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Lincoln Aquatics / Athletics Complex: Shall the measure to support and enhance student health and curriculum by constructing an aquatics center and athletic fields for community/school use, shall Western Placer Unified School District issue $29,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying an average 1.1\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, generating $1,600,000 Districtwide annually, while bonds are outstanding, with strict accountability including: annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying in the Lincoln community be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3104, "fingerprint": "2020|202000584|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000584|PLACER", "content_hash": "cf1a302c69560162", "measure_id": "202000584", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing future tax rates, shall the measure to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom Lake and Sacramento City campuses for job training, nursing/ healthcare, engineering/ science and fire/ police programs, by Los Rios Community College District to authorize $650 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $52 million per year until repaid, an average tax levy less than $0.02 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and taxpayer oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32, "no_votes": 122, "total_votes": 154, "percent_yes": 20.77922077922078, "percent_no": 79.22077922077922, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Los Rios Community College District to ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Los Rios Community College District to issue $650 million in bonds to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at five campuses for various job training and professional programs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an average rate of less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $52 million annually until repaid.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.862233", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.402120", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing future tax rates, shall the measure to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom Lake and Sacramento City campuses for job training, nursing/ healthcare, engineering/ science and fire/ police programs, by Los Rios Community College District to authorize $650 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $52 million per year until repaid, an average tax levy less than $0.02 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and taxpayer oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3088, "fingerprint": "2020|202000036|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000036|PLACER", "content_hash": "ff2605925ce026e3", "measure_id": "202000036", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Placer County Code Article 3.08 governing the civil service system for employees of the County be amended so that the civil service commission will serve as a hearing body for employee grievances, disciplinary appeals, and such other matters for which a hearing is provided, but that the County\u2019s human resources department shall perform all other duties beyond those hearings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 137320, "no_votes": 63700, "total_votes": 201020, "percent_yes": 68.31161078499652, "percent_no": 31.688389215003482, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Placer County's civil service system to limit the civil ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Placer County's civil service system to limit the civil service commission's role to serving as a hearing body for employee grievances and disciplinary appeals, while transferring all other civil service duties to the county's human resources department.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.857385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.399186", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Placer County Code Article 3.08 governing the civil service system for employees of the County be amended so that the civil service commission will serve as a hearing body for employee grievances, disciplinary appeals, and such other matters for which a hearing is provided, but that the County\u2019s human resources department shall perform all other duties beyond those hearings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3089, "fingerprint": "2020|202000037|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000037|PLACER", "content_hash": "ecbaee6a8ea75708", "measure_id": "202000037", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article V, Section 503 of the Placer County Charter be amended to give the County Executive Officer final authority for the appointment, suspension and removal of appointive department heads other than County Counsel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91131, "no_votes": 109787, "total_votes": 200918, "percent_yes": 45.3573099473417, "percent_no": 54.6426900526583, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the Placer County Charter to give the County ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the Placer County Charter to give the County Executive Officer sole authority to appoint, suspend, and remove department heads, except for the County Counsel position. The amendment failed with 45.4% voter support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.857675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.399377", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article V, Section 503 of the Placer County Charter be amended to give the County Executive Officer final authority for the appointment, suspension and removal of appointive department heads other than County Counsel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3090, "fingerprint": "2020|202000038|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000038|PLACER", "content_hash": "f5fbceb420a4c562", "measure_id": "202000038", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article VI, Section 608 of the Placer County Charter be amended to remove bid threshold requirements in the Charter that contradict with State law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 130115, "no_votes": 66794, "total_votes": 196909, "percent_yes": 66.0787470354326, "percent_no": 33.9212529645674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the Placer County Charter to remove local bid threshold r...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the Placer County Charter to remove local bid threshold requirements that conflict with state law requirements for public contracting. The amendment eliminates contradictory provisions between county and state bidding regulations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.857958", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.399561", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article VI, Section 608 of the Placer County Charter be amended to remove bid threshold requirements in the Charter that contradict with State law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3091, "fingerprint": "2020|202000039|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000039|PLACER", "content_hash": "416896e5ae51577b", "measure_id": "202000039", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article IV, Section 403 of the Placer County Charter be amended to require that an elected official of the County must be a resident of the County for thirty (30) days prior to filing nomination papers, and must maintain residency within the County during their entire term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 189252, "no_votes": 20443, "total_votes": 209695, "percent_yes": 90.2510789479959, "percent_no": 9.748921052004107, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Placer County Charter to require elected county offi...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Placer County Charter to require elected county officials to be residents of the county for 30 days before filing nomination papers and to maintain county residency throughout their entire term in office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.858240", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.399741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article IV, Section 403 of the Placer County Charter be amended to require that an elected official of the County must be a resident of the County for thirty (30) days prior to filing nomination papers, and must maintain residency within the County during their entire term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3092, "fingerprint": "2020|202000288|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000288|PLACER", "content_hash": "e92d9302cbc180c8", "measure_id": "202000288", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: (1) bring Sections 1.05 and 7.19 into compliance with State law; (2) bring Sections 2.14 and 8.07 into compliance with the Roseville Municipal Code; (3) bring Sections 4.01 and 4.06 into compliance with the City\u2019s existing practices; (4) repeal Section 7.23; and (5) bring Sections 2.02 and 3.01 into compliance with Chapter 2.06 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding district-based municipal elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47311, "no_votes": 16131, "total_votes": 63442, "percent_yes": 74.57362630434096, "percent_no": 25.426373695659038, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure amended Roseville's City Charter to align various section...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure amended Roseville's City Charter to align various sections with state law, municipal code, and existing city practices, while also updating provisions related to district-based municipal elections. The changes included bringing multiple charter sections into compliance with legal requirements and repealing one section entirely.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.858656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.399920", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: (1) bring Sections 1.05 and 7.19 into compliance with State law; (2) bring Sections 2.14 and 8.07 into compliance with the Roseville Municipal Code; (3) bring Sections 4.01 and 4.06 into compliance with the City\u2019s existing practices; (4) repeal Section 7.23; and (5) bring Sections 2.02 and 3.01 into compliance with Chapter 2.06 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding district-based municipal elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3093, "fingerprint": "2020|202000289|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000289|PLACER", "content_hash": "dd5909b827f84e30", "measure_id": "202000289", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 2.02 of the City Charter be amended to specify that a partial term on the Council of less than 2 years does not count as a term for purposes of term limits but that a combination of an appointment followed by an election, which together exceeds 2 years, to a vacant Council seat shall count as a term for purposes of term limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45568, "no_votes": 19493, "total_votes": 65061, "percent_yes": 70.03888658336022, "percent_no": 29.961113416639776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Placer's City Charter to clarify that partial council te...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Placer's City Charter to clarify that partial council terms under 2 years don't count toward term limits, but appointed terms followed by election that together exceed 2 years do count as a full term. The amendment passed with 70% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.858945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.400107", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 2.02 of the City Charter be amended to specify that a partial term on the Council of less than 2 years does not count as a term for purposes of term limits but that a combination of an appointment followed by an election, which together exceeds 2 years, to a vacant Council seat shall count as a term for purposes of term limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3094, "fingerprint": "2020|202000290|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000290|PLACER", "content_hash": "541a282f1aa10007", "measure_id": "202000290", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 2.03 of the City Charter be amended to: (1) outline the process for the selection of the next vice mayor; (2) establish a district-based rotational process for the seating of the mayor and vice mayor starting in 2022: and (3) specify that the term of the mayor and vice mayor is two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48460, "no_votes": 15872, "total_votes": 64332, "percent_yes": 75.3279860722502, "percent_no": 24.672013927749802, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Placer's City Charter to establish a district-based rota...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Placer's City Charter to establish a district-based rotation system for selecting the mayor and vice mayor starting in 2022, set their terms at two years, and outlined the vice mayor selection process.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.859228", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.400288", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 2.03 of the City Charter be amended to: (1) outline the process for the selection of the next vice mayor; (2) establish a district-based rotational process for the seating of the mayor and vice mayor starting in 2022: and (3) specify that the term of the mayor and vice mayor is two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3095, "fingerprint": "2020|202000291|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000291|PLACER", "content_hash": "5fadb13a60b71772", "measure_id": "202000291", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 3.09 be revised to: create a vacancy when a councilmember moves out of their district; allow Council to initiate filling a vacancy prior to a vacancy occurring; outline the process for filling vacancies by appointment or election; specify a person appointed shall hold office until the next election; specify a person elected to vacant seat shall hold office for the unexpired term; require vacancies for mayor and vice mayor be filled by rotation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49727, "no_votes": 15322, "total_votes": 65049, "percent_yes": 76.44544881550831, "percent_no": 23.554551184491686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment establishes procedures for handling city council vacan...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment establishes procedures for handling city council vacancies, including creating a vacancy when a councilmember moves out of their district, allowing the council to proactively initiate the vacancy-filling process, and setting terms for appointed or elected replacements. It also requires that mayoral and vice mayoral vacancies be filled through rotation among remaining council members.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.859551", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.400472", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 3.09 be revised to: create a vacancy when a councilmember moves out of their district; allow Council to initiate filling a vacancy prior to a vacancy occurring; outline the process for filling vacancies by appointment or election; specify a person appointed shall hold office until the next election; specify a person elected to vacant seat shall hold office for the unexpired term; require vacancies for mayor and vice mayor be filled by rotation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3096, "fingerprint": "2020|202000292|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000292|PLACER", "content_hash": "976a362608d247a3", "measure_id": "202000292", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 4.02 of the City Charter be amended to: (1) allow special meetings of the Council to also be called by the City manager or City attorney consistent with the City's existing practices; (2) require 72 hours' notice for special meetings if feasible instead of 24 hours' notice; and (3) allow notice of special meetings to be served on councilmembers electronically?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52992, "no_votes": 12181, "total_votes": 65173, "percent_yes": 81.30974483298299, "percent_no": 18.690255167017014, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment allows the City manager or City attorney to call speci...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment allows the City manager or City attorney to call special Council meetings, increases the notice requirement from 24 to 72 hours when feasible, and permits electronic delivery of meeting notices to councilmembers.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.859859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.400652", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 4.02 of the City Charter be amended to: (1) allow special meetings of the Council to also be called by the City manager or City attorney consistent with the City's existing practices; (2) require 72 hours' notice for special meetings if feasible instead of 24 hours' notice; and (3) allow notice of special meetings to be served on councilmembers electronically?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3097, "fingerprint": "2020|202000293|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000293|PLACER", "content_hash": "6c4a77f6e61488c6", "measure_id": "202000293", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 7.21 of the City Charter be amended to: (1) raise the sealed bid limit from $19,500 to $75,000; (2) eliminate the annual inflationary or deflationary adjustment to the bid limit; and (3) allow bids to be published on-line consistent with the City's existing practices?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43143, "no_votes": 21041, "total_votes": 64184, "percent_yes": 67.21768665087873, "percent_no": 32.78231334912127, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment raised the sealed bid requirement threshold from $19,5...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment raised the sealed bid requirement threshold from $19,500 to $75,000, eliminated automatic annual adjustments to this limit, and permitted online bid publication in addition to existing practices.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.860229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.400832", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 7.21 of the City Charter be amended to: (1) raise the sealed bid limit from $19,500 to $75,000; (2) eliminate the annual inflationary or deflationary adjustment to the bid limit; and (3) allow bids to be published on-line consistent with the City's existing practices?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3098, "fingerprint": "2020|202000294|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000294|PLACER", "content_hash": "6a20e99a5f795405", "measure_id": "202000294", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall provisions of Article 8 of the City Charter regarding personnel administration be amended as follows: (1) Shall Section 8.01 be amended to address filling vacancies on the personnel board and to clarify that an appointment to an unexpired term shall not count towards the term limit consistent with the City's existing practices? (2) Shall Section 8.04 be amended to allow for the adoption of personnel rules to provide for waivers or modifications of the formal applicant examination process?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40476, "no_votes": 22681, "total_votes": 63157, "percent_yes": 64.08790791202875, "percent_no": 35.912092087971246, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment modified Placer's personnel administration rules to cl...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment modified Placer's personnel administration rules to clarify that appointments to unexpired terms on the personnel board don't count toward term limits and to allow personnel rules that can waive or modify formal examination processes for job applicants. The measure passed with 64.1% voter approval in 2020.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.860513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.401015", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall provisions of Article 8 of the City Charter regarding personnel administration be amended as follows: (1) Shall Section 8.01 be amended to address filling vacancies on the personnel board and to clarify that an appointment to an unexpired term shall not count towards the term limit consistent with the City's existing practices? (2) Shall Section 8.04 be amended to allow for the adoption of personnel rules to provide for waivers or modifications of the formal applicant examination process?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3099, "fingerprint": "2020|202000295|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000295|PLACER", "content_hash": "d0093fdc614789cf", "measure_id": "202000295", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article 10 of the City Charter regarding municipally-owned utilities be amended by revising Section 10.01 to prohibit the City from providing retail potable water to new service areas outside the City limits after January 1, 2021, and by revising Section 10.02 to remove from the Council the authority to delegate to the City manager the ability to establish nonresidential electric rates and to clarify that the Council may establish such rates by ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41242, "no_votes": 22623, "total_votes": 63865, "percent_yes": 64.57684177562045, "percent_no": 35.42315822437955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment prohibits the city from providing retail potable water...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment prohibits the city from providing retail potable water service to new areas outside city limits after January 1, 2021, and removes the City Council's authority to delegate nonresidential electric rate-setting to the city manager while clarifying the Council may set such rates by ordinance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.860784", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.401195", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article 10 of the City Charter regarding municipally-owned utilities be amended by revising Section 10.01 to prohibit the City from providing retail potable water to new service areas outside the City limits after January 1, 2021, and by revising Section 10.02 to remove from the Council the authority to delegate to the City manager the ability to establish nonresidential electric rates and to clarify that the Council may establish such rates by ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3100, "fingerprint": "2020|202000296|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000296|PLACER", "content_hash": "2a8991ba39f1fe54", "measure_id": "202000296", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article 11 of the City Charter be added establishing the Roseville Independent Redistricting Commission and vesting in the commission the exclusive authority to redraw Council electoral district boundaries after every federal decennial census?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40631, "no_votes": 23358, "total_votes": 63989, "percent_yes": 63.496851021269286, "percent_no": 36.503148978730714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would add Article 11 to the Roseville City Charter to create an I...", "summary_text": "The measure would add Article 11 to the Roseville City Charter to create an Independent Redistricting Commission with exclusive authority to redraw City Council district boundaries following each federal census. This would transfer redistricting responsibilities from city officials to the independent commission.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.861055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.401377", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article 11 of the City Charter be added establishing the Roseville Independent Redistricting Commission and vesting in the commission the exclusive authority to redraw Council electoral district boundaries after every federal decennial census?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3101, "fingerprint": "2020|202000287|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000287|PLACER", "content_hash": "a80eeab5d84cd13e", "measure_id": "202000287", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to increase funding for general fund purposes in the City of Auburn such as increased fire, police, and code enforcement services, with all funds staying local and all expenditures subject to an annual audit and oversight by a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee, levying a 1 percent sales tax and raising approximately $2,560,000 annually, which will automatically expire in seven years unless extended by voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3709, "no_votes": 4499, "total_votes": 8208, "percent_yes": 45.18762183235867, "percent_no": 54.81237816764133, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a 1 percent sales tax in Auburn to raise appro...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a 1 percent sales tax in Auburn to raise approximately $2.56 million annually for general fund purposes including fire, police, and code enforcement services, with the tax automatically expiring after seven years unless extended by voters. The funds would have been subject to annual audits and oversight by a Citizens' Oversight Committee.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.861337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.401561", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to increase funding for general fund purposes in the City of Auburn such as increased fire, police, and code enforcement services, with all funds staying local and all expenditures subject to an annual audit and oversight by a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee, levying a 1 percent sales tax and raising approximately $2,560,000 annually, which will automatically expire in seven years unless extended by voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3124, "fingerprint": "2020|202000590|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000590|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "862e72ba2e8d1af3", "measure_id": "202000590", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve classrooms/access for students/Veterans to quality, affordable college education by repairing, constructing/acquiring classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment for science, engineering, technology, healthcare, college/career-training/skilled trades; shall Riverside Community College District's measure authorizing $715,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2\u00a2/$100 assessed valuation ($42,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight/all money locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80922, "no_votes": 92597, "total_votes": 173519, "percent_yes": 46.63581509805842, "percent_no": 53.36418490194158, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Riverside Community College District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Riverside Community College District to issue $715 million in bonds to repair, construct, and acquire classrooms, facilities, sites, and equipment for science, engineering, technology, healthcare, and career training programs. The bonds would have been funded through a property tax levy of 2 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $42 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.867962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.406086", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve classrooms/access for students/Veterans to quality, affordable college education by repairing, constructing/acquiring classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment for science, engineering, technology, healthcare, college/career-training/skilled trades; shall Riverside Community College District's measure authorizing $715,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2\u00a2/$100 assessed valuation ($42,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight/all money locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3121, "fingerprint": "2020|202000587|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000587|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2c1cbd7356d4f11c", "measure_id": "202000587", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and security systems, replace roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, construct, furnish and equip classrooms, science labs, school and career technical education facilities for Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math (STEAM) programs, and add facilities for growing enrollment, shall the Beaumont Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, and an estimated levy of $50 per $100,000 assessed value raising $6,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5208, "no_votes": 10419, "total_votes": 15627, "percent_yes": 33.32693415242849, "percent_no": 66.67306584757151, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Beaumont Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Beaumont Unified School District to issue $98 million in bonds to fund infrastructure improvements including safety systems, roof and utility replacements, classroom construction, and STEAM program facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes estimated at $50 per $100,000 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.867122", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.405514", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and security systems, replace roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, construct, furnish and equip classrooms, science labs, school and career technical education facilities for Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math (STEAM) programs, and add facilities for growing enrollment, shall the Beaumont Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, and an estimated levy of $50 per $100,000 assessed value raising $6,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3125, "fingerprint": "2020|202000591|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000591|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "73f5a684201442cf", "measure_id": "202000591", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety/campus security systems, repair aging roofs/plumbing/electrical systems, upgrade classrooms/labs/facilities/equipment that support college/ career readiness in math, science, engineering, technology, arts, skilled trades, and construct a middle school to relieve overcrowding, shall the Val Verde Unified School District measure authorizing $192,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($11,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money spent local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6204, "no_votes": 3876, "total_votes": 10080, "percent_yes": 61.54761904761905, "percent_no": 38.45238095238095, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Val Verde Unified School District to issue $192 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Val Verde Unified School District to issue $192 million in bonds to fund safety improvements, infrastructure repairs, classroom and facility upgrades, and construction of a new middle school. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 5 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.868321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.406272", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety/campus security systems, repair aging roofs/plumbing/electrical systems, upgrade classrooms/labs/facilities/equipment that support college/ career readiness in math, science, engineering, technology, arts, skilled trades, and construct a middle school to relieve overcrowding, shall the Val Verde Unified School District measure authorizing $192,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($11,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and all money spent local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3123, "fingerprint": "2020|202000589|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000589|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "dc6dc00249e7a6f7", "measure_id": "202000589", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair deteriorating roofs/plumbing/electrical systems; update classrooms/labs/facilities/technology to support college readiness/career preparation in math, science, engineering, technology, arts/skilled trades; upgrade older schools to meet the same academic/safety standards as newer schools, and improve student safety; shall the Jurupa Unified School District measure authorizing $192,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($10,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, local control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7110, "no_votes": 8332, "total_votes": 15442, "percent_yes": 46.0432586452532, "percent_no": 53.9567413547468, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Jurupa Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Jurupa Unified School District to issue $192 million in bonds to repair infrastructure, upgrade classrooms and facilities, and improve safety standards across schools. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 4 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.867658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.405895", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair deteriorating roofs/plumbing/electrical systems; update classrooms/labs/facilities/technology to support college readiness/career preparation in math, science, engineering, technology, arts/skilled trades; upgrade older schools to meet the same academic/safety standards as newer schools, and improve student safety; shall the Jurupa Unified School District measure authorizing $192,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 4\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($10,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, local control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3122, "fingerprint": "2020|202000588|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000588|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "108c007703f8e9ba", "measure_id": "202000588", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize/renovate and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, make technology improvements, repair aging roofs, and make campus health and safety improvements, shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District measure authorizing $230,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately 5.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($12,760,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4526, "no_votes": 4035, "total_votes": 8561, "percent_yes": 52.8676556477047, "percent_no": 47.1323443522953, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Coachella Valley Unified School Distric...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Coachella Valley Unified School District to issue $230 million in bonds to fund school facility modernization, construction, technology improvements, and health and safety upgrades. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 5.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.867385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.405699", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize/renovate and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, make technology improvements, repair aging roofs, and make campus health and safety improvements, shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District measure authorizing $230,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately 5.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($12,760,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3108, "fingerprint": "2020|202000298|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000298|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "eaf49390ac7fb20a", "measure_id": "202000298", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending Section 2.08.045 of the Indian Wells Municipal Code to establish a two-term lifetime limit on City Council service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1173, "no_votes": 723, "total_votes": 1896, "percent_yes": 61.86708860759494, "percent_no": 38.13291139240506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance amends the Indian Wells Municipal Code to establish a lifetime ...", "summary_text": "The ordinance amends the Indian Wells Municipal Code to establish a lifetime limit of two terms for City Council members. It restricts how long individuals can serve on the city council regardless of whether the terms are consecutive or non-consecutive.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.863353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.402861", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending Section 2.08.045 of the Indian Wells Municipal Code to establish a two-term lifetime limit on City Council service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3107, "fingerprint": "2020|202000297|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000297|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a7f635a930c0b02f", "measure_id": "202000297", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted amending Section 2.08.045 of the Indian Wells Municipal Code to establish a two-term lifetime limit on City Council service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1171, "no_votes": 742, "total_votes": 1913, "percent_yes": 61.212754835337165, "percent_no": 38.787245164662835, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended the Indian Wells Municipal Code to establish a lifetime l...", "summary_text": "The measure amended the Indian Wells Municipal Code to establish a lifetime limit of two terms for City Council members. It passed with 61.2% voter approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.863088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.402681", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted amending Section 2.08.045 of the Indian Wells Municipal Code to establish a two-term lifetime limit on City Council service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3114, "fingerprint": "2020|202000299|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000299|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3090a6d95a5747fa", "measure_id": "202000299", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide the City of Blythe with funding to maintain police and fire services, fund blight and building abatement, address homelessness, attract/retain businesses, replace aging public safety equipment, make street/pothole repairs, and fund other general services, shall the measure establishing a 1% local sales tax (transactions and use tax) that will raise approximately $1,144,000 annually, until ended by voters, with annual independent audits and all funds remaining in Blythe, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1017, "no_votes": 418, "total_votes": 1435, "percent_yes": 70.87108013937282, "percent_no": 29.128919860627178, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1% local sales tax in Blythe, California to genera...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1% local sales tax in Blythe, California to generate approximately $1,144,000 annually for general city services including police, fire, street repairs, blight abatement, homelessness programs, and public safety equipment. The tax continues indefinitely until ended by voters and requires annual independent audits with all funds remaining within Blythe.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-05-05", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.865044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.404185", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the City of Blythe with funding to maintain police and fire services, fund blight and building abatement, address homelessness, attract/retain businesses, replace aging public safety equipment, make street/pothole repairs, and fund other general services, shall the measure establishing a 1% local sales tax (transactions and use tax) that will raise approximately $1,144,000 annually, until ended by voters, with annual independent audits and all funds remaining in Blythe, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3115, "fingerprint": "2020|202000300|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000300|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "bea92b0ae4015f5b", "measure_id": "202000300", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to raise between $20,289 and $405,790 annually for general municipal services such as public safety, parks, roads, and senior and youth programs, shall the City of Banning adopt an ordinance imposing a tax on cannabis distribution facilities at an annual rate not to exceed 10% of the distribution facility\u2019s gross receipts until ended by voters, with the Council having discretion to increase or decrease the tax as long as it does not exceed 10%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8042, "no_votes": 3687, "total_votes": 11729, "percent_yes": 68.56509506351777, "percent_no": 31.434904936482226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of Banning to impose an annual tax of up to ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of Banning to impose an annual tax of up to 10% on the gross receipts of cannabis distribution facilities, with the city council able to adjust the rate within that limit. The tax is estimated to generate between $20,289 and $405,790 annually for general municipal services including public safety, parks, roads, and youth and senior programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.865368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.404377", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to raise between $20,289 and $405,790 annually for general municipal services such as public safety, parks, roads, and senior and youth programs, shall the City of Banning adopt an ordinance imposing a tax on cannabis distribution facilities at an annual rate not to exceed 10% of the distribution facility\u2019s gross receipts until ended by voters, with the Council having discretion to increase or decrease the tax as long as it does not exceed 10%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3120, "fingerprint": "2020|202000305|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000305|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4f4973cf657e7fd3", "measure_id": "202000305", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure repealing the voter-approved, locally-controlled Measure DD sales tax generating over $10,000,000 per year in local funding that cannot be taken by the state used to maintain Menifee 911 emergency response; school and police patrols; street and road repairs; traffic reduction; senior and youth programs; parks and other general services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17362, "no_votes": 30397, "total_votes": 47759, "percent_yes": 36.353357482359336, "percent_no": 63.646642517640664, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have repealed Riverside's existing Measure DD sales tax th...", "summary_text": "This measure would have repealed Riverside's existing Measure DD sales tax that generates over $10 million annually for local services including emergency response, police patrols, road repairs, and community programs. The repeal failed, meaning the sales tax remains in effect.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.866854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.405328", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure repealing the voter-approved, locally-controlled Measure DD sales tax generating over $10,000,000 per year in local funding that cannot be taken by the state used to maintain Menifee 911 emergency response; school and police patrols; street and road repairs; traffic reduction; senior and youth programs; parks and other general services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3126, "fingerprint": "2020|202000592|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000592|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f6e20ba66cf91e25", "measure_id": "202000592", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make student safety and school security improvements, repair, upgrade, and equip classrooms, labs and school facilities, support instruction in science, technology, engineering, arts and math, acquire/construct new school facilities to avoid overcrowding, shall the Romoland School District measure authorizing $39,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation (averaging $2.2 million annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight all money locally-controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7232, "no_votes": 6274, "total_votes": 13506, "percent_yes": 53.54657189397305, "percent_no": 46.45342810602695, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Romoland School District to issue $39 ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Romoland School District to issue $39 million in bonds to fund safety improvements, classroom repairs and upgrades, STEAM instruction support, and new facilities to address overcrowding, with repayment through a property tax of $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation. The measure failed despite receiving 53.5% yes votes, as it required a higher threshold to pass.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.868599", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.406504", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make student safety and school security improvements, repair, upgrade, and equip classrooms, labs and school facilities, support instruction in science, technology, engineering, arts and math, acquire/construct new school facilities to avoid overcrowding, shall the Romoland School District measure authorizing $39,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation (averaging $2.2 million annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight all money locally-controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3110, "fingerprint": "2020|202000306|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000306|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "6c6be396b16db7cc", "measure_id": "202000306", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to require the City Council to appoint to fill a vacancy in elected office with up to one year remaining on the term, to call a special election to fill a vacancy with over one year remaining on the term, to call a special run-off election when no candidate receives a majority of the votes cast for the vacant office, and to prohibit appointed officials from referencing \u201cincumbent\u201d, \u201cmember of the City Council\u201d, or other designation indicating incumbency in a future election for the same seat?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73920, "no_votes": 37459, "total_votes": 111379, "percent_yes": 66.36798678386411, "percent_no": 33.63201321613589, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment establishes procedures for filling City Council vacanc...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment establishes procedures for filling City Council vacancies, requiring appointment for terms with up to one year remaining and special elections for longer vacancies, while prohibiting appointed officials from using incumbency designations in future campaigns for the same seat.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.863895", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.403226", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to require the City Council to appoint to fill a vacancy in elected office with up to one year remaining on the term, to call a special election to fill a vacancy with over one year remaining on the term, to call a special run-off election when no candidate receives a majority of the votes cast for the vacant office, and to prohibit appointed officials from referencing \u201cincumbent\u201d, \u201cmember of the City Council\u201d, or other designation indicating incumbency in a future election for the same seat?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3111, "fingerprint": "2020|202000307|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000307|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "430fc694a2ca99c0", "measure_id": "202000307", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to comply with state law requirements, shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to consolidate Mayor elections with the statewide primary and general election, consolidate City Council elections beginning in 2022 with the statewide primary and general election, consolidate Mayor and City Council runoff elections with the statewide general election, provide an exception to allow Wards 2, 4, and 6 runoff elections on November 2, 2021 before transitioning to the statewide general election, and delete Charter subsections 400(f), 400(g), and 400(h) as obsolete; and specify that City Council members are nominated by their ward voters?\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 79691, "no_votes": 29068, "total_votes": 108759, "percent_yes": 73.27301648599196, "percent_no": 26.72698351400804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Riverside's city charter to align mayoral and city counc...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Riverside's city charter to align mayoral and city council elections with statewide primary and general elections to comply with state law requirements, while specifying that council members are nominated by voters in their respective wards.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.864230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.403472", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to comply with state law requirements, shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to consolidate Mayor elections with the statewide primary and general election, consolidate City Council elections beginning in 2022 with the statewide primary and general election, consolidate Mayor and City Council runoff elections with the statewide general election, provide an exception to allow Wards 2, 4, and 6 runoff elections on November 2, 2021 before transitioning to the statewide general election, and delete Charter subsections 400(f), 400(g), and 400(h) as obsolete; and specify that City Council members are nominated by their ward voters?\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3112, "fingerprint": "2020|202000308|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000308|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a18778749aa064bf", "measure_id": "202000308", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to require the City Council to submit any proposed City Charter amendment, except those proposed by voter initiative, to the Charter Review Committee for recommendation before the City Council places the Charter amendment proposal on a ballot?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76345, "no_votes": 32149, "total_votes": 108494, "percent_yes": 70.36794661455933, "percent_no": 29.63205338544067, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Riverside's city charter to require the City Council to ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Riverside's city charter to require the City Council to submit proposed charter amendments to the Charter Review Committee for recommendations before placing them on the ballot, except for amendments proposed through voter initiatives.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.864503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.403782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to require the City Council to submit any proposed City Charter amendment, except those proposed by voter initiative, to the Charter Review Committee for recommendation before the City Council places the Charter amendment proposal on a ballot?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3113, "fingerprint": "2020|202000309|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000309|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f674ebf1fbe041d5", "measure_id": "202000309", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to eliminate the requirement that the adopted budget be placed in all public libraries in the City, to eliminate the requirement that the budget be reproduced and copies made available for the use of departments, offices, and agencies of the City other than on the City website, to clarify that \u201cCity Council approved\u201d capital projects \u201cand funding\u201d shall be exempt from lapsing at the end of each fiscal year, to add the word \u201ctransparent\u201d to the Charter preamble, and to replace the word \u201ccitizen\u201d with \u201cperson\u201d with respect to commenting at public meetings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52061, "no_votes": 56640, "total_votes": 108701, "percent_yes": 47.89376362682956, "percent_no": 52.10623637317044, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended Riverside's city charter to remove requiremen...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended Riverside's city charter to remove requirements for placing the city budget in public libraries and providing physical copies to city departments, clarified that approved capital projects and their funding don't expire at fiscal year-end, added \"transparent\" to the charter preamble, and changed \"citizen\" to \"person\" regarding public meeting participation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.864776", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.403980", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to eliminate the requirement that the adopted budget be placed in all public libraries in the City, to eliminate the requirement that the budget be reproduced and copies made available for the use of departments, offices, and agencies of the City other than on the City website, to clarify that \u201cCity Council approved\u201d capital projects \u201cand funding\u201d shall be exempt from lapsing at the end of each fiscal year, to add the word \u201ctransparent\u201d to the Charter preamble, and to replace the word \u201ccitizen\u201d with \u201cperson\u201d with respect to commenting at public meetings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3117, "fingerprint": "2020|202000303|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000303|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b13e653a1f47e8f2", "measure_id": "202000303", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2020-XX be adopted to: (1) impose permits and regulations on operations of cannabis businesses to reduce public nuisances and separate from sensitive uses; (2) increase the number of cannabis retailers from seven to nine (1/12,000 population); and (3) increase City cannabis tax (not to exceed gross receipts of 6% retailers, 2% distributors, 2.5% manufacturing, 1% testing, and $10/square foot cultivation) for estimated $1,681,383 annually for general municipal\u00a0services\u00a0until\u00a0ended\u00a0by\u00a0voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16670, "no_votes": 17690, "total_votes": 34360, "percent_yes": 48.51571594877765, "percent_no": 51.48428405122235, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed additional permits and regulations on cannabis...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed additional permits and regulations on cannabis businesses, increased the number of allowed cannabis retailers from seven to nine, and raised cannabis business tax rates with specified maximums for different types of operations to generate an estimated $1.68 million annually for general city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.865924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.404758", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2020-XX be adopted to: (1) impose permits and regulations on operations of cannabis businesses to reduce public nuisances and separate from sensitive uses; (2) increase the number of cannabis retailers from seven to nine (1/12,000 population); and (3) increase City cannabis tax (not to exceed gross receipts of 6% retailers, 2% distributors, 2.5% manufacturing, 1% testing, and $10/square foot cultivation) for estimated $1,681,383 annually for general municipal\u00a0services\u00a0until\u00a0ended\u00a0by\u00a0voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3119, "fingerprint": "2020|202000310|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000310|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7d18fabeaa18392d", "measure_id": "202000310", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain San Jacinto\u2019s finances; 911 emergency, medical, fire protection/ public safety response rates; support local businesses/ retain jobs; improve local drinking water; address homelessness; investigate/ prevent property crimes; clean and maintain public areas; repair roads/ potholes; other general services, shall the measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $3,200,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring public disclosure, all funds used in San Jacinto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11396, "no_votes": 5011, "total_votes": 16407, "percent_yes": 69.4581581032486, "percent_no": 30.541841896751393, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established a 1-cent sales tax in San Jacinto to generate approxi...", "summary_text": "The measure established a 1-cent sales tax in San Jacinto to generate approximately $3.2 million annually for general city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and other municipal operations. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters and requires public disclosure of fund usage.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.866521", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.405135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain San Jacinto\u2019s finances; 911 emergency, medical, fire protection/ public safety response rates; support local businesses/ retain jobs; improve local drinking water; address homelessness; investigate/ prevent property crimes; clean and maintain public areas; repair roads/ potholes; other general services, shall the measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $3,200,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring public disclosure, all funds used in San Jacinto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3116, "fingerprint": "2020|202000301|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000301|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "26e20ac5801d04f3", "measure_id": "202000301", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain local 9-1-1 emergency response, police, fire protection, paramedic services, address homelessness, public health and natural disaster preparedness; assist local small businesses; clean/maintain public areas; reduce traffic impacts; and maintain other general services, shall a measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $30,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring public disclosure of spending, no money for County/State, all funds\u00a0staying\u00a0local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33854, "no_votes": 32027, "total_votes": 65881, "percent_yes": 51.38659097463608, "percent_no": 48.61340902536392, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Riverside, California to fund ...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Riverside, California to fund local services including emergency response, police, fire protection, paramedic services, homelessness programs, public health, disaster preparedness, small business assistance, public area maintenance, and traffic reduction. The tax generates approximately $30 million annually and requires public disclosure of spending, with all funds remaining local rather than going to county or state government.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.865642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.404566", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain local 9-1-1 emergency response, police, fire protection, paramedic services, address homelessness, public health and natural disaster preparedness; assist local small businesses; clean/maintain public areas; reduce traffic impacts; and maintain other general services, shall a measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $30,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring public disclosure of spending, no money for County/State, all funds\u00a0staying\u00a0local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3109, "fingerprint": "2020|202000302|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000302|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2cdb94bb1ef49937", "measure_id": "202000302", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a limit of three terms, whether served consecutively or not, be established for members of the City Council of the City of Corona\u00a0as\u00a0described\u00a0in\u00a0Ordinance\u00a0No.\u00a03317?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53965, "no_votes": 10875, "total_votes": 64840, "percent_yes": 83.22794571252314, "percent_no": 16.772054287476863, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a three-term limit for Corona City Council members, ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a three-term limit for Corona City Council members, whether the terms are served consecutively or not. The limit was approved by voters and codified in city ordinance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.863621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.403041", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a limit of three terms, whether served consecutively or not, be established for members of the City Council of the City of Corona\u00a0as\u00a0described\u00a0in\u00a0Ordinance\u00a0No.\u00a03317?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3118, "fingerprint": "2020|202000304|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000304|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d29388dd4dbc5100", "measure_id": "202000304", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for essential city services\u00a0including: 1)\u00a0Reducing\u00a0gangs,\u00a0drugs\u00a0and\u00a0crime; 2)Providing\u00a0fire\u00a0protection,\u00a0paramedic,\u00a0 and\u00a0quick\u00a09-1-1\u00a0emergency\u00a0response; 3)\u00a0Fixing\u00a0streets\u00a0and\u00a0potholes; 4)\u00a0Addressing\u00a0homelessness; 5)\u00a0Keeping\u00a0public\u00a0areas\u00a0safe,\u00a0healthy,\u00a0 clean\u00a0and\u00a0graffiti\u00a0free; 6)\u00a0Supporting\u00a0local\u00a0businesses shall a City of Lake Elsinore Ordinance establishing a one-cent sales tax be approved, providing approximately $10,000,000 annually for general city services until ended by voters, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and\u00a0all\u00a0funds\u00a0controlled\u00a0locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15919, "no_votes": 8969, "total_votes": 24888, "percent_yes": 63.96255223400836, "percent_no": 36.03744776599164, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in Lake Elsinore to generate ap...", "summary_text": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in Lake Elsinore to generate approximately $10 million annually for general city services including public safety, emergency response, street repairs, homelessness programs, and business support. The tax continues indefinitely until ended by voters and includes provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.866245", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.404946", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for essential city services\u00a0including: 1)\u00a0Reducing\u00a0gangs,\u00a0drugs\u00a0and\u00a0crime; 2)Providing\u00a0fire\u00a0protection,\u00a0paramedic,\u00a0 and\u00a0quick\u00a09-1-1\u00a0emergency\u00a0response; 3)\u00a0Fixing\u00a0streets\u00a0and\u00a0potholes; 4)\u00a0Addressing\u00a0homelessness; 5)\u00a0Keeping\u00a0public\u00a0areas\u00a0safe,\u00a0healthy,\u00a0 clean\u00a0and\u00a0graffiti\u00a0free; 6)\u00a0Supporting\u00a0local\u00a0businesses shall a City of Lake Elsinore Ordinance establishing a one-cent sales tax be approved, providing approximately $10,000,000 annually for general city services until ended by voters, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and\u00a0all\u00a0funds\u00a0controlled\u00a0locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3128, "fingerprint": "2020|202000316|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000316|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "14efefef0ac7f663", "measure_id": "202000316", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure known as the \u2018Sacramento Mayoral Accountability and Community Equity Act\u2019 \u2013 which amends the City of Sacramento charter to establish a mayor-council form of government; establish participatory budgeting for citizens\u2019 direct input; require analysis of impacts of certain council decisions on racial, ethnic, LGBTQ, and gender groups; require a specified portion of the budget be invested in inclusive economic development and youth services; makes permanent the city\u2019s ethics commission; and make other changes \u2013 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89233, "no_votes": 119950, "total_votes": 209183, "percent_yes": 42.65786416678219, "percent_no": 57.34213583321781, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed Sacramento's government structure to a mayor-...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed Sacramento's government structure to a mayor-council system and required participatory budgeting, equity impact analyses for certain council decisions, and dedicated budget allocations for economic development and youth services. It also would have made the city's ethics commission permanent.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.869135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.406896", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure known as the \u2018Sacramento Mayoral Accountability and Community Equity Act\u2019 \u2013 which amends the City of Sacramento charter to establish a mayor-council form of government; establish participatory budgeting for citizens\u2019 direct input; require analysis of impacts of certain council decisions on racial, ethnic, LGBTQ, and gender groups; require a specified portion of the budget be invested in inclusive economic development and youth services; makes permanent the city\u2019s ethics commission; and make other changes \u2013 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3129, "fingerprint": "2020|202000317|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000317|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "c050b9ded4926f77", "measure_id": "202000317", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending section 171 of the City of Sacramento Charter, to have the Sacramento Independent Redistricting Commission establish the next council district boundaries map no later than 130 days before the 2022 primary city election so that the map could be used for the 2022 elections, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 132464, "no_votes": 66375, "total_votes": 198839, "percent_yes": 66.61872167934861, "percent_no": 33.38127832065139, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Sacramento's city charter to require the Sacramento Inde...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Sacramento's city charter to require the Sacramento Independent Redistricting Commission to establish new council district boundaries at least 130 days before the 2022 primary election. The amendment ensured the new redistricting map would be completed in time for use in the 2022 city elections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.869402", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.407079", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending section 171 of the City of Sacramento Charter, to have the Sacramento Independent Redistricting Commission establish the next council district boundaries map no later than 130 days before the 2022 primary city election so that the map could be used for the 2022 elections, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3130, "fingerprint": "2020|202000318|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000318|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "b3f6c012aaaa9b22", "measure_id": "202000318", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adding an article to the City of Sacramento Charter to (i) create a new elected body (Rental Housing Board) with powers that include setting rents, establishing regulations, establishing its own budget, charging fees to finance its operations, establishing penalties, conducting investigations, and adjudicating rent adjustments; (ii) set a base rent for all covered rental units within the city and cap annual rent increases; and (iii) limit landlords\u2019 ability to terminate tenancies, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82370, "no_votes": 125602, "total_votes": 207972, "percent_yes": 39.60629315484776, "percent_no": 60.39370684515224, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have created an elected Rental Housing Board with authorit...", "summary_text": "This measure would have created an elected Rental Housing Board with authority to set rents, regulate rental housing, and impose fees, while establishing base rents for covered units, capping annual rent increases, and restricting landlords' ability to end tenancies. The measure failed with 39.6% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.869676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.407262", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adding an article to the City of Sacramento Charter to (i) create a new elected body (Rental Housing Board) with powers that include setting rents, establishing regulations, establishing its own budget, charging fees to finance its operations, establishing penalties, conducting investigations, and adjudicating rent adjustments; (ii) set a base rent for all covered rental units within the city and cap annual rent increases; and (iii) limit landlords\u2019 ability to terminate tenancies, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3127, "fingerprint": "2020|202000311|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000311|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "26f3a01a1f7d657a", "measure_id": "202000311", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure imposing a 0.75 percent transaction and use tax, to be used solely to fund fire protection needs for the City of Isleton be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 119, "no_votes": 71, "total_votes": 190, "percent_yes": 62.63157894736842, "percent_no": 37.36842105263158, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a 0.75 percent sales tax in Isleton to fund fire protection services for the city. Despite receiving 62.6% support, the measure failed because it required a two-thirds majority to pass.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.868865", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.406713", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure imposing a 0.75 percent transaction and use tax, to be used solely to fund fire protection needs for the City of Isleton be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3135, "fingerprint": "2020|202000593|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000593|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "cf1a302c69560162", "measure_id": "202000593", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing future tax rates, shall the measure to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom Lake and Sacramento City campuses for job training, nursing/ healthcare, engineering/ science and fire/ police programs, by Los Rios Community College District to authorize $650 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $52 million per year until repaid, an average tax levy less than $0.02 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and taxpayer oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 193861, "no_votes": 170444, "total_votes": 364305, "percent_yes": 53.213927890092094, "percent_no": 46.786072109907906, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Los Rios Community College District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Los Rios Community College District to issue $650 million in bonds to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at five campuses for various job training and educational programs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an average rate of less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.871174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.408205", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing future tax rates, shall the measure to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom Lake and Sacramento City campuses for job training, nursing/ healthcare, engineering/ science and fire/ police programs, by Los Rios Community College District to authorize $650 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $52 million per year until repaid, an average tax levy less than $0.02 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and taxpayer oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3131, "fingerprint": "2020|202000312|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000312|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "1cbd55df22d63866", "measure_id": "202000312", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the Sacramento City Charter to (1) require that 2.5% of the city's unrestricted revenues be set aside in a newly-established Sacramento Children's Fund, for 12 consecutive fiscal years beginning in 2021-2022, to be spent only on qualifying youth and child services; (2) require that the 2.5% be in addition to that which was expended on eligible youth and children services in fiscal year 2019-2020: and (3) establish a Fund Planning and Oversight Commission, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55866, "no_votes": 67556, "total_votes": 123422, "percent_yes": 45.26421545591548, "percent_no": 54.73578454408452, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended Sacramento's city charter to set aside 2", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended Sacramento's city charter to set aside 2.5% of unrestricted city revenues for 12 years starting in 2021-2022 to fund youth and child services, with the requirement that this be additional funding beyond what was spent in fiscal year 2019-2020. It would have also created a Fund Planning and Oversight Commission to oversee the newly-established Sacramento Children's Fund.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.870011", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.407456", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the Sacramento City Charter to (1) require that 2.5% of the city's unrestricted revenues be set aside in a newly-established Sacramento Children's Fund, for 12 consecutive fiscal years beginning in 2021-2022, to be spent only on qualifying youth and child services; (2) require that the 2.5% be in addition to that which was expended on eligible youth and children services in fiscal year 2019-2020: and (3) establish a Fund Planning and Oversight Commission, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3136, "fingerprint": "2020|202000594|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000594|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "126987d0150be8a8", "measure_id": "202000594", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade student classrooms, labs, libraries, and learning technology for quality instruction in math, science, arts and engineering; provide modern career training centers; update schools to meet current academic/safety standards; and acquire/repair/construct/equip school facilities shall Sacramento City Unified School District issue $750,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($35,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight/audits and all funds locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58241, "no_votes": 35006, "total_votes": 93247, "percent_yes": 62.45884586099285, "percent_no": 37.54115413900715, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Sacramento City Unified School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Sacramento City Unified School District to issue $750 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, labs, libraries, and learning technology, as well as construct and repair school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 5 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.871477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.408395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade student classrooms, labs, libraries, and learning technology for quality instruction in math, science, arts and engineering; provide modern career training centers; update schools to meet current academic/safety standards; and acquire/repair/construct/equip school facilities shall Sacramento City Unified School District issue $750,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value ($35,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight/audits and all funds locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3137, "fingerprint": "2020|202000595|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000595|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "c738f6dd3f616fd7", "measure_id": "202000595", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; building science labs; updating aging technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $45,700,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6\u00a2/$100 of assessed value, averaging $2,600,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens' oversight/ all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 799, "no_votes": 411, "total_votes": 1210, "percent_yes": 66.03305785123968, "percent_no": 33.966942148760324, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the River Delta Unified School District to issue $45", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the River Delta Unified School District to issue $45.7 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including roof repairs, asbestos and mold removal, science lab construction, technology updates, and fire and water safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.871749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.408585", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; building science labs; updating aging technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $45,700,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6\u00a2/$100 of assessed value, averaging $2,600,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens' oversight/ all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3138, "fingerprint": "2020|202000596|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000596|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "d0b7d4c583196c63", "measure_id": "202000596", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; keeping schools safe; updating technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/jobs/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $14,600,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6\u00a2/$100 of assessed value, averagin $845,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight/all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 757, "no_votes": 410, "total_votes": 1167, "percent_yes": 64.86718080548415, "percent_no": 35.13281919451585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the River Delta Unified School District to issue $14", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the River Delta Unified School District to issue $14.6 million in bonds to repair, construct, and equip educational facilities, including addressing safety issues like asbestos and mold removal, updating technology, and improving fire and water safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.872080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.408861", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; keeping schools safe; updating technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/jobs/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $14,600,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6\u00a2/$100 of assessed value, averagin $845,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight/all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3133, "fingerprint": "2020|202000314|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000314|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "4d0e48fc1a74ea34", "measure_id": "202000314", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to support the continued operation of the City of Isleton\u2019s general services, including police, fire, parks, and other unrestricted general fund expenditures, by enacting a one-half (\u00bd) percent transactions and use tax for a period of five (5) years commencing on April 1, 2022, that is projected to provide between $83,726.06 and $106,858.02 of revenue annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 202, "no_votes": 101, "total_votes": 303, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.5% sales tax in the City of Isleton for five years starting April 1, 2022, to fund general city services including police, fire, and parks. The tax was projected to generate approximately $83,726 to $106,858 annually for the city's general fund.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.870554", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.407826", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to support the continued operation of the City of Isleton\u2019s general services, including police, fire, parks, and other unrestricted general fund expenditures, by enacting a one-half (\u00bd) percent transactions and use tax for a period of five (5) years commencing on April 1, 2022, that is projected to provide between $83,726.06 and $106,858.02 of revenue annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3132, "fingerprint": "2020|202000313|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000313|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "8a12161d70874677", "measure_id": "202000313", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect local control with funding that cannot be taken by the State; maintain 911 emergency response times; crime investigation/prevention; well-trained community police officers; school safety/security; pothole/street repair; homelessness reduction programs; local business/jobs support; and other city services, shall a measure to establish a Citrus Heights 1\u00a2 sales tax generating $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, with independent annual audits and citizen oversight, and all funds spent in Citrus Heights?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19159, "no_votes": 21136, "total_votes": 40295, "percent_yes": 47.54684203995533, "percent_no": 52.45315796004467, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 1-cent sales tax in Citrus Heights, Cal...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 1-cent sales tax in Citrus Heights, California, generating approximately $12 million annually for local services including emergency response, police, street repair, and homelessness programs. The tax would have continued indefinitely until repealed by voters and included provisions for independent audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.870280", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.407641", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect local control with funding that cannot be taken by the State; maintain 911 emergency response times; crime investigation/prevention; well-trained community police officers; school safety/security; pothole/street repair; homelessness reduction programs; local business/jobs support; and other city services, shall a measure to establish a Citrus Heights 1\u00a2 sales tax generating $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, with independent annual audits and citizen oversight, and all funds spent in Citrus Heights?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3134, "fingerprint": "2020|202000315|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000315|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "88a3959d87410ce2", "measure_id": "202000315", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support City of Rancho Cordova through relief/recovery including: repairing streets/potholes; keeping public areas healthy, clean/safe; maintaining neighborhood public safety; supporting/attracting new and local businesses/jobs; preparing for any natural disaster/health emergency; addressing homelessness; other general city services; shall the Rancho Cordova measure be adopted levying a \u00bd\u00a2 sales tax, until ended by voters, raising $8,000,000 annually, with yearly audits, citizen oversight, local control/investment during uncertain times, no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16979, "no_votes": 15205, "total_votes": 32184, "percent_yes": 52.75602783992046, "percent_no": 47.24397216007954, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a 0", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a 0.5% sales tax in Rancho Cordova to fund various city services including street repairs, public safety, business support, disaster preparedness, and homelessness programs, generating approximately $8 million annually. The tax remains in effect until voters choose to end it and includes provisions for annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.870837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.408012", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support City of Rancho Cordova through relief/recovery including: repairing streets/potholes; keeping public areas healthy, clean/safe; maintaining neighborhood public safety; supporting/attracting new and local businesses/jobs; preparing for any natural disaster/health emergency; addressing homelessness; other general city services; shall the Rancho Cordova measure be adopted levying a \u00bd\u00a2 sales tax, until ended by voters, raising $8,000,000 annually, with yearly audits, citizen oversight, local control/investment during uncertain times, no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3139, "fingerprint": "2020|202000040|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000040|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "9c37693b2ee0672c", "measure_id": "202000040", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 991, An Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Benito Amending the San Benito County Code to add text relating to the \u201cRegional Commercial (C-3) District\u201d be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6802, "no_votes": 10113, "total_votes": 16915, "percent_yes": 40.21282885013302, "percent_no": 59.78717114986698, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have adopted Ordinance No", "summary_text": "The measure would have adopted Ordinance No. 991, which would amend the San Benito County Code by adding text related to the \"Regional Commercial (C-3) District\" zoning classification.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.872355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.409063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 991, An Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Benito Amending the San Benito County Code to add text relating to the \u201cRegional Commercial (C-3) District\u201d be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3143, "fingerprint": "2020|202000599|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000599|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "884757af9f5f5d8c", "measure_id": "202000599", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To strengthen student safety by installing secure school entrances, fencing/cameras; to construct a multipurpose building/cafeteria for assembly, nutrition and healthy meals to support learning; and to install solar panels for clean energy and lower utility costs, shall the San Benito High School District measure authorizing $30,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 1.3 cents per $100 assessed value ($1,650,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5491, "no_votes": 9316, "total_votes": 14807, "percent_yes": 37.08381171067738, "percent_no": 62.91618828932262, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the San Benito High School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the San Benito High School District to issue $30 million in bonds to fund security improvements like secure entrances and cameras, construct a multipurpose building/cafeteria, and install solar panels. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of approximately 1.3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.873444", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.409823", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To strengthen student safety by installing secure school entrances, fencing/cameras; to construct a multipurpose building/cafeteria for assembly, nutrition and healthy meals to support learning; and to install solar panels for clean energy and lower utility costs, shall the San Benito High School District measure authorizing $30,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 1.3 cents per $100 assessed value ($1,650,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3141, "fingerprint": "2020|202000597|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000597|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "c054ba28a5194697", "measure_id": "202000597", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize classrooms and facilities; undertake seismic and earthquake safety upgrades and repairs; and qualify for state matching funds, shall the measure to reauthorize $4.2 million of Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s bonds, previously approved by voters in 2010, as new bonds with legal rates, projected yearly average levies less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2031 (generating an average $455,000 dollars per year), annual audits and taxpayer oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1180, "no_votes": 875, "total_votes": 2055, "percent_yes": 57.420924574209245, "percent_no": 42.579075425790755, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reauthorized $4", "summary_text": "This measure reauthorized $4.2 million in school bonds for the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to fund classroom repairs, facility modernization, and seismic safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2031.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.872898", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.409437", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize classrooms and facilities; undertake seismic and earthquake safety upgrades and repairs; and qualify for state matching funds, shall the measure to reauthorize $4.2 million of Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s bonds, previously approved by voters in 2010, as new bonds with legal rates, projected yearly average levies less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2031 (generating an average $455,000 dollars per year), annual audits and taxpayer oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3140, "fingerprint": "2020|202000041|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000041|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "0f31e176d2e32653", "measure_id": "202000041", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative enacting the Strada Verde Specific Plan, and making County General Plan and Zoning Code Amendments for approximately 2,777 acres of agricultural land in northwest San Benito County, allowing various uses (including Research/Development, Automotive Testing/Tracks, Distribution, Offices, Business/Professional Services Commercial, Light Industrial, Hospitality, Retail, and Public/Private Services) and requiring the creation of a 209.5 acre Pajaro River Park and preservation of 561.7 acres exclusively for agriculture be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11372, "no_votes": 16708, "total_votes": 28080, "percent_yes": 40.4985754985755, "percent_no": 59.5014245014245, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted the Strada Verde Specific Plan to rezone appro...", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted the Strada Verde Specific Plan to rezone approximately 2,777 acres of agricultural land in northwest San Benito County for mixed commercial, industrial, and research uses while requiring creation of a 209.5-acre river park and preservation of 561.7 acres for agriculture.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.872627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.409254", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative enacting the Strada Verde Specific Plan, and making County General Plan and Zoning Code Amendments for approximately 2,777 acres of agricultural land in northwest San Benito County, allowing various uses (including Research/Development, Automotive Testing/Tracks, Distribution, Offices, Business/Professional Services Commercial, Light Industrial, Hospitality, Retail, and Public/Private Services) and requiring the creation of a 209.5 acre Pajaro River Park and preservation of 561.7 acres exclusively for agriculture be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3144, "fingerprint": "2020|202000600|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000600|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "490611dc5aa51581", "measure_id": "202000600", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student safety and school security, repair classrooms and facilities including wiring, plumbing and roofs; construct new classrooms; and qualify for state matching funds shall Aromas -San Juan Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $30.5 million of bonds with legal rates, yearly projected average levies less than $0.051 /$100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating an average $2 million dollars per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no projected increase in current tax rates be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1904, "no_votes": 1300, "total_votes": 3204, "percent_yes": 59.425717852684144, "percent_no": 40.574282147315856, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue $30", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue $30.5 million in bonds to fund facility repairs, classroom construction, and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging less than $0.051 per $100 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.873807", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.410004", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student safety and school security, repair classrooms and facilities including wiring, plumbing and roofs; construct new classrooms; and qualify for state matching funds shall Aromas -San Juan Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $30.5 million of bonds with legal rates, yearly projected average levies less than $0.051 /$100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating an average $2 million dollars per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no projected increase in current tax rates be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3142, "fingerprint": "2020|202000598|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000598|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "a69b0603731f3d55", "measure_id": "202000598", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by modernizing aging classrooms, technology/science labs; upgrading outdated wiring/ sewer lines; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $274,100,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $19/$100,000 assessed valuation ($17,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, with audits, no funding for administrators, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 248, "no_votes": 226, "total_votes": 474, "percent_yes": 52.32067510548524, "percent_no": 47.67932489451476, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Cabrillo Community College District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Cabrillo Community College District to issue $274,100,000 in bonds to repair and upgrade classrooms, technology and science labs, and infrastructure including wiring and sewer lines. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of $19 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.873176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.409630", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by modernizing aging classrooms, technology/science labs; upgrading outdated wiring/ sewer lines; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $274,100,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $19/$100,000 assessed valuation ($17,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, with audits, no funding for administrators, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3164, "fingerprint": "2020|202000604|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000604|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "cf28fe1801eeb74f", "measure_id": "202000604", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; remove hazardous materials; improve safety/security, labs, classrooms, technology for math, science, engineering, arts, skilled trades/ college/career readiness instruction; renovate, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Rim of the World Unified School District's measure authorizing $51,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($3,400,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4517, "no_votes": 4926, "total_votes": 9443, "percent_yes": 47.83437466906703, "percent_no": 52.16562533093297, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Rim of the World Unified School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Rim of the World Unified School District to issue $51.5 million in bonds to repair and renovate school facilities, including roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, classrooms, and laboratories. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.880171", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.413776", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; remove hazardous materials; improve safety/security, labs, classrooms, technology for math, science, engineering, arts, skilled trades/ college/career readiness instruction; renovate, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Rim of the World Unified School District's measure authorizing $51,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($3,400,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3161, "fingerprint": "2020|202000601|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000601|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3fad8e4ae159d2d6", "measure_id": "202000601", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and security systems, replace roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, construct, furnish and equip classrooms, science labs, school and career technical education facilities for Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math (STEAM) programs, and add facilities for growing enrollment, shall the Beaumont Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, and an estimated levy of $50 per $100,000 assessed value raising $6,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent\r\naudits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 1, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Beaumont Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Beaumont Unified School District to issue $98 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including safety systems, roof and infrastructure repairs, new classrooms and labs, and STEAM program facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes estimated at $50 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising approximately $6 million annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.879123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.413135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and security systems, replace roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, construct, furnish and equip classrooms, science labs, school and career technical education facilities for Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math (STEAM) programs, and add facilities for growing enrollment, shall the Beaumont Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, and an estimated levy of $50 per $100,000 assessed value raising $6,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent\r\naudits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3162, "fingerprint": "2020|202000602|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000602|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "e9a5c2d645db5ea1", "measure_id": "202000602", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make campus security/safety improvements,  repair/replace roofs, modernize/renovate classrooms and school facilities, and replace outdated technology, shall the Morongo Unified School District measure authorizing $55,600,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with estimated repayment amounts averaging $3,280,000 annually estimated through 2053, projected average tax rate of 3.686 cents per $100 assessed value, a board appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds and no money for teachers\u2019 salaries, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5663, "no_votes": 8348, "total_votes": 14011, "percent_yes": 40.418242809221326, "percent_no": 59.581757190778674, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Morongo Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Morongo Unified School District to issue $55.6 million in bonds to fund campus security improvements, roof repairs, classroom modernization, and technology upgrades. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 3.686 cents per $100 of assessed value, with repayment continuing until approximately 2053.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.879406", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.413364", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make campus security/safety improvements,  repair/replace roofs, modernize/renovate classrooms and school facilities, and replace outdated technology, shall the Morongo Unified School District measure authorizing $55,600,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with estimated repayment amounts averaging $3,280,000 annually estimated through 2053, projected average tax rate of 3.686 cents per $100 assessed value, a board appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds and no money for teachers\u2019 salaries, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3165, "fingerprint": "2020|202000605|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000605|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1873d4e33d3761a1", "measure_id": "202000605", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and campus security systems; construct classrooms and school facilities to relieve overcrowding; and repair, acquire, construct classrooms, sites, equipment and facilities that support student achievement in science, technology, engineering, arts and math; shall Victor Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $48,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately $19 per $100,000 of assessed value ($2,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6955, "no_votes": 6990, "total_votes": 13945, "percent_yes": 49.87450699175331, "percent_no": 50.12549300824669, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Victor Elementary School District to is...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Victor Elementary School District to issue $48 million in bonds to construct and repair classrooms and facilities, improve safety systems, and purchase equipment supporting STEAM education. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $19 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.880517", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.413959", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and campus security systems; construct classrooms and school facilities to relieve overcrowding; and repair, acquire, construct classrooms, sites, equipment and facilities that support student achievement in science, technology, engineering, arts and math; shall Victor Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $48,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately $19 per $100,000 of assessed value ($2,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3153, "fingerprint": "2020|202000321|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000321|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "91373e57bafcab92", "measure_id": "202000321", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To avoid cutbacks in Yucaipa's existing paramedic program and increased response times on emergency 911 calls; generate funds from Yucaipa visitors to benefit local residents; enhance police and fire protection; increase local youth and senior services; and fund other general services provided throughout the City like streets and parks, shall the ordinance be adopted to increase the local sales tax by one-half percent; generating approximately $2,000,000 annually, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and public reporting?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5212, "no_votes": 9281, "total_votes": 14493, "percent_yes": 35.962188642793066, "percent_no": 64.03781135720693, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased the local sales tax by 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased the local sales tax by 0.5% in Yucaipa to fund general city services including police, fire, paramedic programs, youth and senior services, streets, and parks, generating approximately $2 million annually. The measure included provisions for citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and public reporting of the funds.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.876509", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.411670", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid cutbacks in Yucaipa's existing paramedic program and increased response times on emergency 911 calls; generate funds from Yucaipa visitors to benefit local residents; enhance police and fire protection; increase local youth and senior services; and fund other general services provided throughout the City like streets and parks, shall the ordinance be adopted to increase the local sales tax by one-half percent; generating approximately $2,000,000 annually, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and public reporting?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3152, "fingerprint": "2020|202000319|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000319|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "342ddbe08c8250e6", "measure_id": "202000319", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure imposing a cannabis special tax of up to 15% of cannabis businesses gross receipts and up to $30 per square foot of cultivation space to raise approximately $100,000 a year until voters decide otherwise, with fifty percent of the proceeds used for law enforcement and fifty percent for other city services, be adopted, with voter approval also approving commercial cannabis businesses as a regulated land use in the City of Barstow?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1767, "no_votes": 1412, "total_votes": 3179, "percent_yes": 55.58351682919157, "percent_no": 44.41648317080843, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a cannabis tax of up to 15% of gross receipts ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a cannabis tax of up to 15% of gross receipts and up to $30 per square foot of cultivation space to generate approximately $100,000 annually, with half the revenue going to law enforcement and half to other city services. It would have also authorized commercial cannabis businesses as a regulated land use in the City of Barstow.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.876219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.411487", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure imposing a cannabis special tax of up to 15% of cannabis businesses gross receipts and up to $30 per square foot of cultivation space to raise approximately $100,000 a year until voters decide otherwise, with fifty percent of the proceeds used for law enforcement and fifty percent for other city services, be adopted, with voter approval also approving commercial cannabis businesses as a regulated land use in the City of Barstow?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3149, "fingerprint": "2020|202000320|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000320|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c3b6082d54e437dd", "measure_id": "202000320", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2896, entitled 'An Ordinance of the People of Redlands facilitating and providing for the enhancement of sustainable development within the Transit Villages Planning Area of the City of Redlands by amending the City of Redlands General Plan and the 1978 voter-approved initiative measure commonly known as Proposition R, as amended by the 1987 voter-approved initiative measure commonly known as Measure N,' be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7798, "no_votes": 14407, "total_votes": 22205, "percent_yes": 35.11821661787885, "percent_no": 64.88178338212114, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended Redlands' General Plan and modified previous v...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended Redlands' General Plan and modified previous voter-approved growth control measures (Proposition R and Measure N) to allow enhanced sustainable development within the city's Transit Villages Planning Area.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.875145", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.410938", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2896, entitled 'An Ordinance of the People of Redlands facilitating and providing for the enhancement of sustainable development within the Transit Villages Planning Area of the City of Redlands by amending the City of Redlands General Plan and the 1978 voter-approved initiative measure commonly known as Proposition R, as amended by the 1987 voter-approved initiative measure commonly known as Measure N,' be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3145, "fingerprint": "2020|202000042|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000042|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6212e936fa9c6323", "measure_id": "202000042", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the revised Charter approved by the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino at its regular meeting on July 28, 2020, for submission to the voters, be ratified and adopted as the Charter of the County of San Bernardino?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 378964, "no_votes": 368224, "total_votes": 747188, "percent_yes": 50.71869462571669, "percent_no": 49.28130537428331, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would ratify and adopt a revised county charter for San Bernardi...", "summary_text": "This measure would ratify and adopt a revised county charter for San Bernardino County that was approved by the Board of Supervisors in July 2020. The measure passed, establishing the new charter as the governing document for the county.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.874075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.410193", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the revised Charter approved by the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino at its regular meeting on July 28, 2020, for submission to the voters, be ratified and adopted as the Charter of the County of San Bernardino?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3146, "fingerprint": "2020|202000043|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000043|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "fc85e03bca99d4e4", "measure_id": "202000043", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure entitled \u201cThe San Bernardino County Supervisor Compensation Reduction and Term Limits\u201d that will amend the County Charter to impose a term limit of one term for all Districts beginning December of 2020 and reduce the total compensation for each member of the Board of Supervisors to $5,000 per month be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 516184, "no_votes": 256098, "total_votes": 772282, "percent_yes": 66.8387972269197, "percent_no": 33.161202773080305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the San Bernardino County Charter to limit county superv...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the San Bernardino County Charter to limit county supervisors to one term beginning in December 2020 and reduce their monthly compensation to $5,000. The measure passed with 66.8% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.874347", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.410374", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure entitled \u201cThe San Bernardino County Supervisor Compensation Reduction and Term Limits\u201d that will amend the County Charter to impose a term limit of one term for all Districts beginning December of 2020 and reduce the total compensation for each member of the Board of Supervisors to $5,000 per month be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3157, "fingerprint": "2020|202000326|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000326|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6e33e28a46943eb0", "measure_id": "202000326", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to protect Montclair's long-term financial ability to fund general community needs, including keeping Montclair safe; preparing for / recovering from public health emergencies; helping prevent contamination of local water sources; maintaining 911 emergency response; continuing afterschool and senior programs; repairing streets; addressing homelessness; increasing the sales tax by 1 cent, providing approximately $7,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring Independent financial audits, all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8419, "no_votes": 3810, "total_votes": 12229, "percent_yes": 68.84454984054297, "percent_no": 31.155450159457033, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the sales tax by 1 cent in Montclair to generate appro...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the sales tax by 1 cent in Montclair to generate approximately $7 million annually for general community services including public safety, emergency response, street repairs, and various programs. The measure requires independent financial audits and specifies that all funds must be used locally, with the tax continuing until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.877844", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.412405", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to protect Montclair's long-term financial ability to fund general community needs, including keeping Montclair safe; preparing for / recovering from public health emergencies; helping prevent contamination of local water sources; maintaining 911 emergency response; continuing afterschool and senior programs; repairing streets; addressing homelessness; increasing the sales tax by 1 cent, providing approximately $7,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring Independent financial audits, all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3156, "fingerprint": "2020|202000324|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000324|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "8f2e0e5d3520b54d", "measure_id": "202000324", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund essential Chino Hills City services including, without limitation, police, 911 emergency response, street maintenance, safe and clean parks and open spaces, retaining local businesses and jobs, and maintaining the City's financial stability, shall an ordinance amending the City's Municipal Code to revise the definition of \"hotel\" and to increase the rate of the transient occupancy tax (\"hotel tax\") paid by hotel guests, from 10% to 12% (raising approximately $260,000.00 annually) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23931, "no_votes": 12934, "total_votes": 36865, "percent_yes": 64.91523124915231, "percent_no": 35.08476875084769, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) paid by hotel ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) paid by hotel guests in Chino Hills from 10% to 12% and revised the definition of \"hotel\" in the city's municipal code. The tax increase is expected to generate approximately $260,000 annually for city services including police, emergency response, street maintenance, and parks.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.877566", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.412218", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund essential Chino Hills City services including, without limitation, police, 911 emergency response, street maintenance, safe and clean parks and open spaces, retaining local businesses and jobs, and maintaining the City's financial stability, shall an ordinance amending the City's Municipal Code to revise the definition of \"hotel\" and to increase the rate of the transient occupancy tax (\"hotel tax\") paid by hotel guests, from 10% to 12% (raising approximately $260,000.00 annually) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3150, "fingerprint": "2020|202000325|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000325|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2eccea8f853e71e5", "measure_id": "202000325", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure a sustainable and affordable water supply, shall the measure: (1) reducing the number of new homes from eight to three per acre, (2) reducing the number of apartments and multifamily dwellings from 25 to eight units per acre, (3) maintaining current high standards for apartment sizes, with (1) through (3) becoming operative when State law allows; and (4) limiting extensions for residential tract/parcel maps to the state law minimum, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23399, "no_votes": 9382, "total_votes": 32781, "percent_yes": 71.3797626673988, "percent_no": 28.620237332601207, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure reduces residential density limits in San Bernardino from eight t...", "summary_text": "The measure reduces residential density limits in San Bernardino from eight to three homes per acre and from 25 to eight apartment/multifamily units per acre, with these changes taking effect when state law allows, and limits extensions for residential development maps to state minimums.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.875500", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.411118", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure a sustainable and affordable water supply, shall the measure: (1) reducing the number of new homes from eight to three per acre, (2) reducing the number of apartments and multifamily dwellings from 25 to eight units per acre, (3) maintaining current high standards for apartment sizes, with (1) through (3) becoming operative when State law allows; and (4) limiting extensions for residential tract/parcel maps to the state law minimum, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3155, "fingerprint": "2020|202000323|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000323|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "954ce9ddfbce52c8", "measure_id": "202000323", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure to enact a sales tax at the rate of 1% in the Town of Apple Valley, providing approximately $7,000,000 annually until ended by voters, to fund general Town services, requiring annual independent audits with all funds remaining local, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10982, "no_votes": 21565, "total_votes": 32547, "percent_yes": 33.74197314652656, "percent_no": 66.25802685347344, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have enacted a 1% sales tax in Apple Valley to generate ap...", "summary_text": "This measure would have enacted a 1% sales tax in Apple Valley to generate approximately $7 million annually for general town services, with annual independent audits and funds remaining local until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.877220", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.412039", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure to enact a sales tax at the rate of 1% in the Town of Apple Valley, providing approximately $7,000,000 annually until ended by voters, to fund general Town services, requiring annual independent audits with all funds remaining local, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3160, "fingerprint": "2020|202000330|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000330|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1a25f2e7e7b86fd1", "measure_id": "202000330", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance providing funding for essential municipal services, including without limitation: police services, crime suppression, community policing/emergency response; medical and fire protection; street/pothole repair; library, park, recreation facilities maintenance; homelessness/economic improvement programs; and other general purposes, by establishing a 1% Transactions and Use (\"sales\") tax, providing an estimated $15 million annually (audited) until ended by the voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19280, "no_votes": 19109, "total_votes": 38389, "percent_yes": 50.22272005001432, "percent_no": 49.77727994998568, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1% sales tax in San Bernardino to fund various mun...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1% sales tax in San Bernardino to fund various municipal services including police, fire, street repair, parks, libraries, and homelessness programs, generating an estimated $15 million annually. The tax continues until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.878839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.412946", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance providing funding for essential municipal services, including without limitation: police services, crime suppression, community policing/emergency response; medical and fire protection; street/pothole repair; library, park, recreation facilities maintenance; homelessness/economic improvement programs; and other general purposes, by establishing a 1% Transactions and Use (\"sales\") tax, providing an estimated $15 million annually (audited) until ended by the voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3151, "fingerprint": "2020|202000329|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000329|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "44851bd56e9e81c8", "measure_id": "202000329", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to secure at least $4,300,000 for the City of Upland to use solely for public improvements to Memorial Park, which may include a new baseball field, additional public parking and other new public amenities, landscaping, structures, and walking trails, shall the City discontinue using approximately 4.63 acres of Memorial Park so it may be sold to San Antonio Regional Hospital to add new facilities and increase capacity for critically-needed medical services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17746, "no_votes": 19188, "total_votes": 36934, "percent_yes": 48.0478691720366, "percent_no": 51.9521308279634, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the City of Upland to sell approximately 4", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the City of Upland to sell approximately 4.63 acres of Memorial Park to San Antonio Regional Hospital for hospital expansion, with the city using the proceeds of at least $4.3 million to fund improvements to the remaining park areas including a new baseball field, parking, and walking trails.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.875892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.411301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to secure at least $4,300,000 for the City of Upland to use solely for public improvements to Memorial Park, which may include a new baseball field, additional public parking and other new public amenities, landscaping, structures, and walking trails, shall the City discontinue using approximately 4.63 acres of Memorial Park so it may be sold to San Antonio Regional Hospital to add new facilities and increase capacity for critically-needed medical services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3154, "fingerprint": "2020|202000322|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000322|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2409fb66b1ed7e6c", "measure_id": "202000322", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Adelanto 's measure, to fund parks/recreation programs, capital improvements/other infrastructure projects, public safety, and to fight illegal dumping and blight, enacting a vacant property tax on parcels used less than 50 days per year, at rates ranging from $50.00/acre to $600.00/acre annually, for 20 years, based on zoning, raising about $6,200,000/year, with citizen oversight and hardship exemptions for seniors and low-income individuals, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5525, "no_votes": 2880, "total_votes": 8405, "percent_yes": 65.73468173706128, "percent_no": 34.26531826293872, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have enacted a vacant property tax on parcels used less th...", "summary_text": "This measure would have enacted a vacant property tax on parcels used less than 50 days per year at rates of $50-$600 per acre annually for 20 years, with exemptions for seniors and low-income individuals. The tax was projected to raise approximately $6.2 million per year to fund parks, recreation, infrastructure, public safety, and anti-blight efforts in Adelanto.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.876879", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.411855", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Adelanto 's measure, to fund parks/recreation programs, capital improvements/other infrastructure projects, public safety, and to fight illegal dumping and blight, enacting a vacant property tax on parcels used less than 50 days per year, at rates ranging from $50.00/acre to $600.00/acre annually, for 20 years, based on zoning, raising about $6,200,000/year, with citizen oversight and hardship exemptions for seniors and low-income individuals, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3159, "fingerprint": "2020|202000328|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000328|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "8422c3fc49daeba8", "measure_id": "202000328", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent reductions to City services including public safety, 911 emergency response, gang/prostitution prevention programs, street/pothole repairs, park/library maintenance, youth after-school, senior and homelessness programs, cleaning public areas, retaining/attracting businesses, and other general services, shall a measure extending the City of San Bernardino's sales tax at a one percent rate, providing approximately $40,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, oversight, and all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33500, "no_votes": 25545, "total_votes": 59045, "percent_yes": 56.73638750105852, "percent_no": 43.26361249894148, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended San Bernardino's existing 1% sales tax indefinitely to ...", "summary_text": "This measure extended San Bernardino's existing 1% sales tax indefinitely to fund city services including public safety, street repairs, parks, libraries, and social programs, generating approximately $40 million annually. The measure includes requirements for independent audits and oversight, with all funds designated for local use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.878568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.412765", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent reductions to City services including public safety, 911 emergency response, gang/prostitution prevention programs, street/pothole repairs, park/library maintenance, youth after-school, senior and homelessness programs, cleaning public areas, retaining/attracting businesses, and other general services, shall a measure extending the City of San Bernardino's sales tax at a one percent rate, providing approximately $40,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, oversight, and all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3158, "fingerprint": "2020|202000327|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000327|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "213396aee4106203", "measure_id": "202000327", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for safety services, fire protection, paramedics, 911 emergency response, addressing homelessness, police patrols and crime prevention, maintaining library services, parks, sidewalks and roads, keeping public areas well-maintained and other general services; shall the City of Redlands' measure establishing a one-cent sales tax be adopted, providing $10.7 million annually for city services until ended by voters, requiring a citizen oversight committee, independent audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20552, "no_votes": 15286, "total_votes": 35838, "percent_yes": 57.34695016462972, "percent_no": 42.65304983537028, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established a one-cent sales tax in Redlands to generate approxim...", "summary_text": "The measure established a one-cent sales tax in Redlands to generate approximately $10.7 million annually for various city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, libraries, and parks. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters and includes requirements for citizen oversight and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.878120", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.412586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for safety services, fire protection, paramedics, 911 emergency response, addressing homelessness, police patrols and crime prevention, maintaining library services, parks, sidewalks and roads, keeping public areas well-maintained and other general services; shall the City of Redlands' measure establishing a one-cent sales tax be adopted, providing $10.7 million annually for city services until ended by voters, requiring a citizen oversight committee, independent audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3147, "fingerprint": "2020|202000044|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000044|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "712140b771fa6546", "measure_id": "202000044", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on February 19, 2020, by the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County ordering the reorganization to include formation of the Spring Valley Lake Community Services District together with the formation of Zone A for solid waste and street sweeping and the Dissolution of County Service Area 64, known as LAFCO 3233A, be approved subject to the terms and conditions as more particularly described in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1428, "no_votes": 3332, "total_votes": 4760, "percent_yes": 30.0, "percent_no": 70.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have approved the creation of the Spring Valley Lake Commun...", "summary_text": "The measure would have approved the creation of the Spring Valley Lake Community Services District with a zone for solid waste and street sweeping services, while dissolving the existing County Service Area 64. This reorganization was previously ordered by the Local Agency Formation Commission and required voter approval to take effect.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.874618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.410566", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on February 19, 2020, by the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County ordering the reorganization to include formation of the Spring Valley Lake Community Services District together with the formation of Zone A for solid waste and street sweeping and the Dissolution of County Service Area 64, known as LAFCO 3233A, be approved subject to the terms and conditions as more particularly described in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3148, "fingerprint": "2020|202000045|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000045|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a5c8d586f489c433", "measure_id": "202000045", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an appropriations limit, as defined by Subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be established for the Wrightwood Community Services District, Counties of San Bernardino and Los Angeles, State of California, in the amount of $660,612?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1811, "no_votes": 649, "total_votes": 2460, "percent_yes": 73.6178861788618, "percent_no": 26.382113821138205, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a $660,612 appropriations limit for the Wrightwood C...", "summary_text": "This measure established a $660,612 appropriations limit for the Wrightwood Community Services District as required by California's constitutional spending limit provisions. The limit sets a maximum amount the district can appropriate annually without voter approval for increases.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.874881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.410746", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an appropriations limit, as defined by Subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be established for the Wrightwood Community Services District, Counties of San Bernardino and Los Angeles, State of California, in the amount of $660,612?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3163, "fingerprint": "2020|202000603|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000603|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "8950fe594939afea", "measure_id": "202000603", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update science, technology, engineering, art, math classrooms; upgrade air conditioning, electrical, fire safety, security, lighting, communications/camera systems, classroom locks; construct, acquire, repair, equip classrooms, facilities, sites, shall Mountain View School District\u2019s measure authorizing $33,000,000 in bonds for School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 at legal rates, levying 2 cents/$100 assessed value, averaging $1,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no administrator salaries, all funds for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1790, "no_votes": 1805, "total_votes": 3595, "percent_yes": 49.7913769123783, "percent_no": 50.2086230876217, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Mountain View School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Mountain View School District to issue $33 million in bonds to update STEAM classrooms, upgrade building systems like air conditioning and security, and construct or repair school facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of 2 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $1.8 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.879893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.413580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update science, technology, engineering, art, math classrooms; upgrade air conditioning, electrical, fire safety, security, lighting, communications/camera systems, classroom locks; construct, acquire, repair, equip classrooms, facilities, sites, shall Mountain View School District\u2019s measure authorizing $33,000,000 in bonds for School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 at legal rates, levying 2 cents/$100 assessed value, averaging $1,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no administrator salaries, all funds for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11134, "fingerprint": "2020|202000347|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000347|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "65cbbfee6d2a1ca2", "measure_id": "202000347", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide permanent and supportive housing for extremely low- to low-income individuals and families, including supportive mental health and substance abuse services, for populations including veterans, seniors, the disabled, youth and the homeless, shall the City of San Diego issue up to $900 million in general obligation bonds financed by property tax assessments estimated between approximately $3 and $21 per each $100,000 of assessed valuation for fiscal years 2022 through 2068?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 366723, "no_votes": 270554, "total_votes": 637277, "percent_yes": 57.54530604431041, "percent_no": 42.45469395568959, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized San Diego to issue up to $900 million in ge...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized San Diego to issue up to $900 million in general obligation bonds to fund permanent and supportive housing for extremely low- to low-income individuals and families, including veterans, seniors, disabled individuals, youth, and the homeless, along with mental health and substance abuse services. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax assessments estimated at $3 to $21 per $100,000 of assessed property value from fiscal years 2022 through 2068.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.440942", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.887305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.418010", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide permanent and supportive housing for extremely low- to low-income individuals and families, including supportive mental health and substance abuse services, for populations including veterans, seniors, the disabled, youth and the homeless, shall the City of San Diego issue up to $900 million in general obligation bonds financed by property tax assessments estimated between approximately $3 and $21 per each $100,000 of assessed valuation for fiscal years 2022 through 2068?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3166, "fingerprint": "2020|202000046|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000046|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "8d922e3d98793aa9", "measure_id": "202000046", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall this Initiative be adopted for the purpose of amending the San Diego County General Plan to require voter approval for General Plan amendments that increase residential density for property designated by the General Plan as Semi-Rural or Rural?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 407534, "no_votes": 423630, "total_votes": 831164, "percent_yes": 49.031719371868846, "percent_no": 50.968280628131154, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have amended the San Diego County General Plan to requi...", "summary_text": "This initiative would have amended the San Diego County General Plan to require voter approval for any General Plan amendments that increase residential density on property designated as Semi-Rural or Rural. The measure failed with 49.0% support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.880930", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.414149", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall this Initiative be adopted for the purpose of amending the San Diego County General Plan to require voter approval for General Plan amendments that increase residential density for property designated by the General Plan as Semi-Rural or Rural?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11128, "fingerprint": "2020|202000348|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000348|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c9a510bd478548eb", "measure_id": "202000348", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to dissolve the Community Review Board on Police Practices and replace it with a Commission on Police Practices, with members appointed by the City Council, its own staff, subpoena power, independent legal counsel, and authority to investigate police officer misconduct, review complaints against officers, and make recommendations on police officer discipline, police policies, and Police Department legal compliance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 468051, "no_votes": 159365, "total_votes": 627416, "percent_yes": 74.59978706312876, "percent_no": 25.40021293687124, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would dissolve the existing Community Review Board on Police Pra...", "summary_text": "This measure would dissolve the existing Community Review Board on Police Practices and replace it with a Commission on Police Practices that has expanded powers including subpoena authority, independent staff and legal counsel, and the ability to investigate misconduct and make disciplinary recommendations. The new commission's members would be appointed by the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.438868", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.883850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.415989", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to dissolve the Community Review Board on Police Practices and replace it with a Commission on Police Practices, with members appointed by the City Council, its own staff, subpoena power, independent legal counsel, and authority to investigate police officer misconduct, review complaints against officers, and make recommendations on police officer discipline, police policies, and Police Department legal compliance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3167, "fingerprint": "2020|202000047|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000047|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "146b0b825591d513", "measure_id": "202000047", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the San Diego County General Plan Amendment PDS2015-GPA-15-001 approved by the Board of Supervisors for the development of the Newland Sierra Project, be approved? The existing General Plan allows 99 homes and up to 2,000,000 square feet of commercial with open space. General Plan Amendment PDS2015-GPA-15-001 would authorize up to 2,199 homes and 1,777,684 square feet of commercial. The approved Newland Sierra Project includes a planned community of 2,135 homes, a school site, 81,000 square feet of retail, 36 acres of parks and 1,209 acres of open space.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 349822, "no_votes": 484663, "total_votes": 834485, "percent_yes": 41.92070558488169, "percent_no": 58.07929441511831, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have approved a general plan amendment to allow the Newlan...", "summary_text": "This measure would have approved a general plan amendment to allow the Newland Sierra Project to build up to 2,199 homes and about 1.78 million square feet of commercial space, compared to the existing plan's limit of 99 homes and 2 million square feet of commercial. The specific project would include 2,135 homes, a school site, retail space, parks, and open space preservation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.881205", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.414333", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Diego County General Plan Amendment PDS2015-GPA-15-001 approved by the Board of Supervisors for the development of the Newland Sierra Project, be approved? The existing General Plan allows 99 homes and up to 2,000,000 square feet of commercial with open space. General Plan Amendment PDS2015-GPA-15-001 would authorize up to 2,199 homes and 1,777,684 square feet of commercial. The approved Newland Sierra Project includes a planned community of 2,135 homes, a school site, 81,000 square feet of retail, 36 acres of parks and 1,209 acres of open space.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11144, "fingerprint": "2020|202000617|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000617|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "827a3d7502c8ec88", "measure_id": "202000617", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to change the process for electing School Board members in the San Diego Unified School District, by providing that voters in individual sub-districts nominate and elect their representative in both the primary and general elections, rather than the current system in which candidates are nominated in individual sub-districts in the primary but advance to a general election in the entire School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 308270, "no_votes": 135965, "total_votes": 444235, "percent_yes": 69.3934516640967, "percent_no": 30.606548335903298, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed San Diego Unified School District board elections so tha...", "summary_text": "This measure changed San Diego Unified School District board elections so that both the primary and general elections are conducted within individual sub-districts, rather than the previous system where primary elections were held in sub-districts but general elections were district-wide. The change means school board members are now elected solely by voters in their specific sub-district for both election rounds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.444593", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.892967", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.421666", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to change the process for electing School Board members in the San Diego Unified School District, by providing that voters in individual sub-districts nominate and elect their representative in both the primary and general elections, rather than the current system in which candidates are nominated in individual sub-districts in the primary but advance to a general election in the entire School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3180, "fingerprint": "2020|202000337|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000337|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7b6866960b3c14e8", "measure_id": "202000337", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure be adopted to: increase the City of San Diego\u2019s 10.5% hotel visitor tax to 11.75, 12.75, and 13.75 percentage points, depending on hotel location, through at least 2061, designated to fund convention center expansion, modernization, promotion and operations, homelessness services and programs, and street repairs; and authorize related bonds; with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and audits by the City Auditor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 239024, "no_votes": 127349, "total_votes": 366373, "percent_yes": 65.24061543836473, "percent_no": 34.75938456163527, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased San Diego's hotel visitor tax from 10", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased San Diego's hotel visitor tax from 10.5% to between 11.75% and 13.75% depending on location through at least 2061, with revenues designated for convention center expansion, homelessness services, and street repairs. It would have also authorized related bonds and established citizen oversight and auditing requirements.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.887033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.417816", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure be adopted to: increase the City of San Diego\u2019s 10.5% hotel visitor tax to 11.75, 12.75, and 13.75 percentage points, depending on hotel location, through at least 2061, designated to fund convention center expansion, modernization, promotion and operations, homelessness services and programs, and street repairs; and authorize related bonds; with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and audits by the City Auditor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11133, "fingerprint": "2020|202000349|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000349|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "333d80779ef11335", "measure_id": "202000349", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to include the office of School Board member from the San Diego Unified School District under City laws that address removal of elected officials for cause, filling vacancies in elected office, and succession to office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 384536, "no_votes": 64416, "total_votes": 448952, "percent_yes": 85.65191824515762, "percent_no": 14.348081754842383, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment extends San Diego's existing municipal laws governing ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment extends San Diego's existing municipal laws governing the removal of elected officials for cause, vacancy filling procedures, and succession protocols to include San Diego Unified School District board members. The measure brings school board positions under the same legal framework that applies to other city elected offices.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.440182", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.886189", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.417262", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to include the office of School Board member from the San Diego Unified School District under City laws that address removal of elected officials for cause, filling vacancies in elected office, and succession to office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3177, "fingerprint": "2020|202000338|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000338|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "0aa14cc8f8d99468", "measure_id": "202000338", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter sections 39.1 and 39.2 be amended to provide that the City Council appoints the City Auditor from at least three candidates recommended by the Audit Committee; the Auditor is limited to two five-year terms; the Council may appoint an interim Auditor; and public members of the screening committee for the Audit Committee serve until replaced; and make clarifying amendments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 269583, "no_votes": 64006, "total_votes": 333589, "percent_yes": 80.81291649304984, "percent_no": 19.18708350695016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended San Diego's city charter to change how the City Auditor ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended San Diego's city charter to change how the City Auditor is selected, requiring the City Council to appoint the auditor from at least three candidates recommended by the Audit Committee, and limiting the auditor to two five-year terms. It also allowed the Council to appoint interim auditors and made public members of the audit screening committee serve indefinite terms until replaced.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.885228", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.416726", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter sections 39.1 and 39.2 be amended to provide that the City Council appoints the City Auditor from at least three candidates recommended by the Audit Committee; the Auditor is limited to two five-year terms; the Council may appoint an interim Auditor; and public members of the screening committee for the Audit Committee serve until replaced; and make clarifying amendments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11129, "fingerprint": "2020|202000331|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000331|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c393ca8e294332da", "measure_id": "202000331", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to preserve the City\u2019s ability to receive state infrastructure funding for public works projects by giving the City discretion to allow the use of project labor agreements for City public works, in a manner consistent with state laws and best practices, including provisions for taxpayer protections, transparency, and accountability in the contracting process, by repealing and replacing Chapter 2.59 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37462, "no_votes": 17990, "total_votes": 55452, "percent_yes": 67.55752723075813, "percent_no": 32.442472769241874, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure repealed and replaced a chapter of Chula Vista's Municipal Code t...", "summary_text": "The measure repealed and replaced a chapter of Chula Vista's Municipal Code to give the city discretion to use project labor agreements on public works projects, ensuring compliance with state laws that tie such agreements to infrastructure funding eligibility. It included provisions for taxpayer protections, transparency, and accountability in the contracting process.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.439054", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.884274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.416168", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to preserve the City\u2019s ability to receive state infrastructure funding for public works projects by giving the City discretion to allow the use of project labor agreements for City public works, in a manner consistent with state laws and best practices, including provisions for taxpayer protections, transparency, and accountability in the contracting process, by repealing and replacing Chapter 2.59 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3173, "fingerprint": "2020|202000350|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000350|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bc4e257edaa36aa9", "measure_id": "202000350", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall People\u2019s Ordinance O-10960 be amended to exclude the Midway-Pacific Highway Community Plan area, which includes the Sports Arena, from the 30-foot height limit on buildings in the Coastal Zone, with any future development still required to comply with other governing laws?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 350855, "no_votes": 269435, "total_votes": 620290, "percent_yes": 56.5630592142385, "percent_no": 43.4369407857615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended an existing ordinance to remove the 30-foot height limit...", "summary_text": "This measure amended an existing ordinance to remove the 30-foot height limit on buildings in the Midway-Pacific Highway Community Plan area (including the Sports Arena) within San Diego's Coastal Zone. Future development in this area would still need to comply with other applicable laws and regulations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.882854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.415437", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall People\u2019s Ordinance O-10960 be amended to exclude the Midway-Pacific Highway Community Plan area, which includes the Sports Arena, from the 30-foot height limit on buildings in the Coastal Zone, with any future development still required to comply with other governing laws?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11131, "fingerprint": "2020|202000339|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000339|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "50c8a9769833be78", "measure_id": "202000339", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Title 2, Chapter 2.04, Section 2.04.010(A) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code be adopted to prohibit city council compensation adjustments from exceeding the amount established by the San Diego Regional Consumer Price Index, to require the city council to either make or waive a compensation adjustment in January of each year, and to prohibit the city council from enacting retroactive increases for years in which the city council waived a compensation adjustment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51176, "no_votes": 14761, "total_votes": 65937, "percent_yes": 77.61347953349409, "percent_no": 22.386520466505914, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance limits Carlsbad city council compensation adjustments to not e...", "summary_text": "This ordinance limits Carlsbad city council compensation adjustments to not exceed the San Diego Regional Consumer Price Index and requires the council to annually decide in January whether to implement or waive the adjustment. It also prohibits retroactive compensation increases for years when adjustments were previously waived.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.439808", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.885524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.416904", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Title 2, Chapter 2.04, Section 2.04.010(A) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code be adopted to prohibit city council compensation adjustments from exceeding the amount established by the San Diego Regional Consumer Price Index, to require the city council to either make or waive a compensation adjustment in January of each year, and to prohibit the city council from enacting retroactive increases for years in which the city council waived a compensation adjustment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3169, "fingerprint": "2020|202000332|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000332|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "455dae3b390810fe", "measure_id": "202000332", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure proposing the adoption of the Marisol Specific Plan and corresponding amendments to the City\u2019s Community Plan, Zoning Map, and Local Coastal Plan and Implementing Ordinance, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 981, "no_votes": 1406, "total_votes": 2387, "percent_yes": 41.097612065354, "percent_no": 58.902387934646, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have adopted the Marisol Specific Plan and made correspondi...", "summary_text": "The measure would have adopted the Marisol Specific Plan and made corresponding amendments to San Diego's Community Plan, Zoning Map, and Local Coastal Plan and Implementing Ordinance.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.881749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.414700", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure proposing the adoption of the Marisol Specific Plan and corresponding amendments to the City\u2019s Community Plan, Zoning Map, and Local Coastal Plan and Implementing Ordinance, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11130, "fingerprint": "2020|202000334|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000334|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "202000334", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3747, "no_votes": 4059, "total_votes": 7806, "percent_yes": 48.00153727901614, "percent_no": 51.99846272098386, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the San Diego City Clerk and City Treasurer p...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the San Diego City Clerk and City Treasurer positions from elected offices to appointed positions. The measure failed with 48% of voters supporting the change.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.439244", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.884568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.416361", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3170, "fingerprint": "2020|202000340|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000340|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f9a7bd283e4eb4e1", "measure_id": "202000340", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the electors of the City of Encinitas adopt the citizen initiative titled \u201cAn Ordinance of the City of Encinitas Authorizing Commercial Cannabis Activities Involving Retail Sales, Cultivation, Manufacturing, Cannabis Kitchens and Distribution, and Personal Use Cultivation, Subject to Certain Regulations and Restrictions.\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19962, "no_votes": 19077, "total_votes": 39039, "percent_yes": 51.133481902712674, "percent_no": 48.866518097287326, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative authorized various commercial cannabis activities in Encinita...", "summary_text": "This initiative authorized various commercial cannabis activities in Encinitas, including retail sales, cultivation, manufacturing, cannabis kitchens, and distribution, as well as personal use cultivation, subject to city regulations and restrictions. The measure passed with 51.1% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.882042", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.414888", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the electors of the City of Encinitas adopt the citizen initiative titled \u201cAn Ordinance of the City of Encinitas Authorizing Commercial Cannabis Activities Involving Retail Sales, Cultivation, Manufacturing, Cannabis Kitchens and Distribution, and Personal Use Cultivation, Subject to Certain Regulations and Restrictions.\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3181, "fingerprint": "2020|202000341|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000341|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "8bc6829c7046644f", "measure_id": "202000341", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to maintain fire protection, paramedics, 911 emergency response, prevention programs, neighborhood/community crime prevention; address homelessness; improve natural disaster/medical/emergency response; maintain streets; maintain lifeguard center, parks, community center, youth/afterschool/senior programs; other general services, by establishing a 1\u023c sales tax providing approximately $1,300,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, public disclosure of spending, all funds for Imperial Beach, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7273, "no_votes": 3084, "total_votes": 10357, "percent_yes": 70.22303755913875, "percent_no": 29.776962440861254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Imperial Beach to fund fire pr...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Imperial Beach to fund fire protection, paramedics, emergency response, homelessness programs, street maintenance, parks, and other general city services, generating approximately $1.3 million annually. The measure requires independent audits and public disclosure of spending, with the tax continuing until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.887660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.418191", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to maintain fire protection, paramedics, 911 emergency response, prevention programs, neighborhood/community crime prevention; address homelessness; improve natural disaster/medical/emergency response; maintain streets; maintain lifeguard center, parks, community center, youth/afterschool/senior programs; other general services, by establishing a 1\u023c sales tax providing approximately $1,300,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, public disclosure of spending, all funds for Imperial Beach, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11136, "fingerprint": "2020|202000335|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000335|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "68dccc838073ee0d", "measure_id": "202000335", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2019 - 2463, \"An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City Adding Chapter 8.38 to the National City Municipal Code Prohibiting the Retail Sale of Dogs, Cats and Rabbits,\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5054, "no_votes": 3126, "total_votes": 8180, "percent_yes": 61.78484107579462, "percent_no": 38.21515892420538, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance prohibits the retail sale of dogs, cats, and rabbits within Nat...", "summary_text": "The ordinance prohibits the retail sale of dogs, cats, and rabbits within National City. It was adopted after receiving approval from 61.8% of voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.441883", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.888859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.418930", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2019 - 2463, \"An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City Adding Chapter 8.38 to the National City Municipal Code Prohibiting the Retail Sale of Dogs, Cats and Rabbits,\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3182, "fingerprint": "2020|202000342|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000342|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d036c516dc600395", "measure_id": "202000342", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal expenses such as fire, safety, roads and recreation, shall the City repeal the current cannabis tax and modernize it with a new cannabis or hemp business tax at annual rates not to exceed 8% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is estimated to generate $560,000 to $1,120,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8439, "no_votes": 3299, "total_votes": 11738, "percent_yes": 71.89470097120464, "percent_no": 28.105299028795358, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure replaced San Diego's existing cannabis tax with a new business ta...", "summary_text": "The measure replaced San Diego's existing cannabis tax with a new business tax on cannabis and hemp operations, setting maximum annual rates of 8% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses and 4% for all other cannabis businesses. The tax was estimated to generate $560,000 to $1,120,000 annually for general municipal expenses and would remain in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.888054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.418383", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal expenses such as fire, safety, roads and recreation, shall the City repeal the current cannabis tax and modernize it with a new cannabis or hemp business tax at annual rates not to exceed 8% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is estimated to generate $560,000 to $1,120,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11132, "fingerprint": "2020|202000343|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000343|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "36f007d60f786c1e", "measure_id": "202000343", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance adding Article XVII, Section 2.94 to Chapter 2 of the Oceanside City Code establishing limits of three four year terms whether consecutive or not for the offices of mayor and city council member be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 67203, "no_votes": 14626, "total_votes": 81829, "percent_yes": 82.12614109912134, "percent_no": 17.87385890087866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a limit of three four-year terms for the offices of m...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a limit of three four-year terms for the offices of mayor and city council member in Oceanside, whether the terms are served consecutively or not.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.439993", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.885917", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.417084", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance adding Article XVII, Section 2.94 to Chapter 2 of the Oceanside City Code establishing limits of three four year terms whether consecutive or not for the offices of mayor and city council member be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3176, "fingerprint": "2020|202000336|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000336|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3fac7b9286090c92", "measure_id": "202000336", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointed by the City Manager?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11384, "no_votes": 34472, "total_votes": 45856, "percent_yes": 24.82554082344731, "percent_no": 75.17445917655269, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the city clerk and city treasurer positions f...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the city clerk and city treasurer positions from elected offices to appointed positions, with the City Manager making the appointments.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.884952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.416544", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointed by the City Manager?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11137, "fingerprint": "2020|202000606|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000606|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b0d128706770342b", "measure_id": "202000606", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade fire alarms and emergency communication systems; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms throughout the District; and qualify the District for state matching funds; shall Cajon Valley Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $220 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, yearly average levies less than $26 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating an average of $12.1 million dollars per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no estimated increase in current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16598, "no_votes": 19552, "total_votes": 36150, "percent_yes": 45.914246196403866, "percent_no": 54.085753803596134, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Cajon Valley Union School District to i...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Cajon Valley Union School District to issue $220 million in bonds to upgrade fire alarms and emergency communication systems, replace portable classrooms with permanent ones, and qualify for state matching funds. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes with yearly average levies of less than $26 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.442073", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.889141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.419112", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade fire alarms and emergency communication systems; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms throughout the District; and qualify the District for state matching funds; shall Cajon Valley Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $220 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, yearly average levies less than $26 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating an average of $12.1 million dollars per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no estimated increase in current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3171, "fingerprint": "2020|202000344|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000344|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "51a9aa89cbda92d0", "measure_id": "202000344", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 19-OR0729-1, rezoning approximately 176.6 acres in northeastern Oceanside to implement the North River Farms project, be adopted? The current zoning is Agricultural, potentially allowing 2.5-acre minimum residential lots. Ordinance No. 19-OR0729-1 changes the zoning to Planned Development to accommodate the North River Farms project, approved by the City Council, including up to 585 homes, a 24.9-acre commercial village, 68.1 acres of agriculture, and 17 acres of parks/open space.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27687, "no_votes": 56782, "total_votes": 84469, "percent_yes": 32.77770543039458, "percent_no": 67.22229456960542, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have rezoned 176", "summary_text": "The measure would have rezoned 176.6 acres in northeastern Oceanside from Agricultural zoning to Planned Development to allow the North River Farms project with up to 585 homes, commercial space, agriculture areas, and parks. The rezoning would have changed the current potential for 2.5-acre minimum residential lots to a mixed-use development including residential, commercial, agricultural, and open space components.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.882313", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.415076", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 19-OR0729-1, rezoning approximately 176.6 acres in northeastern Oceanside to implement the North River Farms project, be adopted? The current zoning is Agricultural, potentially allowing 2.5-acre minimum residential lots. Ordinance No. 19-OR0729-1 changes the zoning to Planned Development to accommodate the North River Farms project, approved by the City Council, including up to 585 homes, a 24.9-acre commercial village, 68.1 acres of agriculture, and 17 acres of parks/open space.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11138, "fingerprint": "2020|202000607|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000607|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5a63a61de51ed169", "measure_id": "202000607", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make student safety and campus security improvements throughout the District and renovate, construct, acquire, equip and furnish school facilities/classrooms, including roofs, plumbing, solar panels, heating /air conditioning and electrical systems, shall the Chula Vista Elementary School District measure authorizing $300 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with projected levies of $0.03 cents per $100 assessed valuation raising approximately $16.7 million for annual repayment while bonds are outstanding, and requiring annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36363, "no_votes": 29247, "total_votes": 65610, "percent_yes": 55.42295381801554, "percent_no": 44.57704618198446, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Chula Vista Elementary School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Chula Vista Elementary School District to issue $300 million in bonds to fund safety improvements, campus security upgrades, and facility renovations including roofs, plumbing, solar panels, and HVAC systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a projected rate of $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $16.7 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.442259", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.889432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.419299", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make student safety and campus security improvements throughout the District and renovate, construct, acquire, equip and furnish school facilities/classrooms, including roofs, plumbing, solar panels, heating /air conditioning and electrical systems, shall the Chula Vista Elementary School District measure authorizing $300 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with projected levies of $0.03 cents per $100 assessed valuation raising approximately $16.7 million for annual repayment while bonds are outstanding, and requiring annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3183, "fingerprint": "2020|202000345|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000345|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f249a42cccbbc2d7", "measure_id": "202000345", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Oceanside establish a Cannabis Business Tax not to exceed 6% of gross revenues for Cannabis Retailers, Manufacturers and Distributors and not to exceed 3.5% of gross revenues for Cannabis Cultivators to generate approximately $1,900,000 annually, until voters change or repeal the tax, to fund general city services, including enforcement efforts against cannabis businesses operating illegally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51548, "no_votes": 31887, "total_votes": 83435, "percent_yes": 61.7822256846647, "percent_no": 38.2177743153353, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a cannabis business tax in Oceanside with rates up to...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a cannabis business tax in Oceanside with rates up to 6% of gross revenues for retailers, manufacturers and distributors, and up to 3.5% for cultivators, expected to generate approximately $1.9 million annually for general city services including enforcement against illegal cannabis operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.888322", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.418564", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Oceanside establish a Cannabis Business Tax not to exceed 6% of gross revenues for Cannabis Retailers, Manufacturers and Distributors and not to exceed 3.5% of gross revenues for Cannabis Cultivators to generate approximately $1,900,000 annually, until voters change or repeal the tax, to fund general city services, including enforcement efforts against cannabis businesses operating illegally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3174, "fingerprint": "2020|202000351|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000351|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a203705c575a5b3f", "measure_id": "202000351", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the Santee General Plan requiring voter approval for development actions that would increase residential density or intensify land use over that currently permitted by the General Plan be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15720, "no_votes": 14812, "total_votes": 30532, "percent_yes": 51.48696449626621, "percent_no": 48.51303550373379, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure requires voter approval for any development projects in Santee t...", "summary_text": "This measure requires voter approval for any development projects in Santee that would increase residential density or intensify land use beyond what is currently allowed in the city's General Plan.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.883121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.415626", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the Santee General Plan requiring voter approval for development actions that would increase residential density or intensify land use over that currently permitted by the General Plan be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11141, "fingerprint": "2020|202000610|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000610|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "2ed9c08f914fcadd", "measure_id": "202000610", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve classrooms, science labs, and career-training facilities that support college preparation/career readiness in math, science, engineering, technology, arts, and skilled trades/vocations, improve student safety/security, remove asbestos/lead paint where needed, and repair aging roofs, plumbing, and electrical, shall the Poway Unified School District measure authorizing $448,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($23,100,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight/all funds underlocal control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32836, "no_votes": 32375, "total_votes": 65211, "percent_yes": 50.35346797319471, "percent_no": 49.64653202680529, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Poway Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Poway Unified School District to issue $448 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom upgrades, science labs, career training facilities, safety improvements, asbestos and lead paint removal, and repairs to roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.442827", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.890254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.420005", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve classrooms, science labs, and career-training facilities that support college preparation/career readiness in math, science, engineering, technology, arts, and skilled trades/vocations, improve student safety/security, remove asbestos/lead paint where needed, and repair aging roofs, plumbing, and electrical, shall the Poway Unified School District measure authorizing $448,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($23,100,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight/all funds underlocal control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3172, "fingerprint": "2020|202000346|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000346|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "52221a031162e825", "measure_id": "202000346", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve The Farm in Poway Specific Plan as adopted by the Poway City Council to amend the General Plan and Zoning Code to allow development of a master-planned sustainable community with a maximum of 160 homes and at least 70.4 acres of permanent open space including community-serving recreational and agricultural amenities, on approximately 117.2 acres at 17166 Stoneridge Country Club Lane in the City of Poway?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17483, "no_votes": 10664, "total_votes": 28147, "percent_yes": 62.1131914591253, "percent_no": 37.8868085408747, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure approved The Farm in Poway Specific Plan, which amends the city's...", "summary_text": "The measure approved The Farm in Poway Specific Plan, which amends the city's General Plan and Zoning Code to allow development of up to 160 homes and at least 70.4 acres of permanent open space on approximately 117.2 acres. The plan includes community recreational and agricultural amenities as part of a master-planned sustainable community.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.882581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.415256", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve The Farm in Poway Specific Plan as adopted by the Poway City Council to amend the General Plan and Zoning Code to allow development of a master-planned sustainable community with a maximum of 160 homes and at least 70.4 acres of permanent open space including community-serving recreational and agricultural amenities, on approximately 117.2 acres at 17166 Stoneridge Country Club Lane in the City of Poway?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11139, "fingerprint": "2020|202000608|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000608|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ef026d5124279fc7", "measure_id": "202000608", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, remove asbestos, improve student safety/campus security; acquire, renovate, construct/equip classrooms, science labs, sites, school facilities/technology that support college/career readiness in math, science, engineering, technology/the arts; shall Escondido Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $205,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be approved, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($12,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21723, "no_votes": 18707, "total_votes": 40430, "percent_yes": 53.729903536977496, "percent_no": 46.270096463022504, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Escondido Union School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Escondido Union School District to issue $205 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, classrooms, and science labs. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.442448", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.889710", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.419540", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, remove asbestos, improve student safety/campus security; acquire, renovate, construct/equip classrooms, science labs, sites, school facilities/technology that support college/career readiness in math, science, engineering, technology/the arts; shall Escondido Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $205,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be approved, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($12,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3178, "fingerprint": "2020|202000352|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000352|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4e623b67d9649b01", "measure_id": "202000352", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the Santee Municipal Code to require that no person shall serve as an \u201cElected Official,\u201d defined to include the offices of Mayor and Member of the City Council, for more than twelve years, or three terms, whichever is less, with any portion of term, whether by election or appointment, counting as a full term, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19269, "no_votes": 10832, "total_votes": 30101, "percent_yes": 64.01448456861898, "percent_no": 35.98551543138102, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Santee Municipal Code to establish term limits for e...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Santee Municipal Code to establish term limits for elected officials, restricting mayors and city council members to no more than twelve years or three terms in office. Any partial term served through election or appointment counts as a full term under the limit.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.886470", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.417444", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the Santee Municipal Code to require that no person shall serve as an \u201cElected Official,\u201d defined to include the offices of Mayor and Member of the City Council, for more than twelve years, or three terms, whichever is less, with any portion of term, whether by election or appointment, counting as a full term, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11140, "fingerprint": "2020|202000609|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000609|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "0ede56fae15960d0", "measure_id": "202000609", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student safety and school security; repair aging classrooms and schools including outdated plumbing, electrical wiring, roofs and heating/ air conditioning; replace portables with permanent classrooms; renovate classrooms and qualify for State matching funds, shall Lakeside Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $33 million of bonds with annual audits, legal rates, projected yearly levies less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $2.2 million per year) and taxpayer oversight be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5161, "no_votes": 7256, "total_votes": 12417, "percent_yes": 41.56398485946686, "percent_no": 58.43601514053314, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Lakeside Union School District to issu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Lakeside Union School District to issue $33 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including safety upgrades, repairs to aging infrastructure, and classroom renovations. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a projected rate of less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed property value annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.442637", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.889984", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.419781", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student safety and school security; repair aging classrooms and schools including outdated plumbing, electrical wiring, roofs and heating/ air conditioning; replace portables with permanent classrooms; renovate classrooms and qualify for State matching funds, shall Lakeside Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $33 million of bonds with annual audits, legal rates, projected yearly levies less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $2.2 million per year) and taxpayer oversight be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3179, "fingerprint": "2020|202000353|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000353|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1880821d663d5083", "measure_id": "202000353", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the Santee Municipal Code to establish a three-term lifetime limit on City Council service and a separate two-term lifetime limit on Mayoral service, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20235, "no_votes": 9765, "total_votes": 30000, "percent_yes": 67.45, "percent_no": 32.55, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes lifetime term limits of three terms for Santee City C...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes lifetime term limits of three terms for Santee City Council members and two terms for the Mayor by amending the municipal code.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.886759", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.417630", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the Santee Municipal Code to establish a three-term lifetime limit on City Council service and a separate two-term lifetime limit on Mayoral service, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11135, "fingerprint": "2020|202000333|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000333|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9d49fe9d20cb5c9e", "measure_id": "202000333", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Lemon Grove Add a Three-Quarter (3/4) Cent Transactions and Use Tax (Sales Tax)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2756, "no_votes": 3723, "total_votes": 6479, "percent_yes": 42.53742861552709, "percent_no": 57.46257138447291, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have added a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have added a 0.75% sales tax in the city of Lemon Grove. The measure failed with 42.5% voter approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.441696", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.888588", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.418751", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Lemon Grove Add a Three-Quarter (3/4) Cent Transactions and Use Tax (Sales Tax)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3175, "fingerprint": "2020|202000354|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000354|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "55de8942c2bb7ea8", "measure_id": "202000354", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a proposed ordinance amending Solana Beach Municipal Code to Repeal Current Prohibitions Entirely and Allow Commercial Cannabis (Marijuana) Retailers in Non-Residential Zones and Marijuana Deliveries and Certain Cultivation in all Zones in the City of Solana Beach be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3265, "no_votes": 5276, "total_votes": 8541, "percent_yes": 38.2273738438122, "percent_no": 61.7726261561878, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have repealed existing prohibitions on commercial cannabis...", "summary_text": "This measure would have repealed existing prohibitions on commercial cannabis activities in Solana Beach and allowed marijuana retailers in non-residential zones, delivery services citywide, and certain cultivation in all zones.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.883575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.415810", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a proposed ordinance amending Solana Beach Municipal Code to Repeal Current Prohibitions Entirely and Allow Commercial Cannabis (Marijuana) Retailers in Non-Residential Zones and Marijuana Deliveries and Certain Cultivation in all Zones in the City of Solana Beach be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11142, "fingerprint": "2020|202000614|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000614|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b6036daeabc76aa3", "measure_id": "202000614", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace outdated electrical wiring; increase internet access; upgrade fire alarms; improve student safety /campus security; and replace aging portables, shall Cajon Valley Union School District\u2019s measure to issue $125 million in bonds be adopted, extending but not increasing the current tax rate (averaging $13/$100,000 of assessed valuation) and raising $6.2 million annually until repaid with legal interest rates, annual audits, independent oversight, all funds spent locally, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and qualifying for State reimbursement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36822, "no_votes": 32295, "total_votes": 69117, "percent_yes": 53.274881722296975, "percent_no": 46.725118277703025, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Cajon Valley Union School District to i...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Cajon Valley Union School District to issue $125 million in bonds to fund infrastructure improvements including electrical system upgrades, internet access expansion, fire alarm improvements, safety enhancements, and replacement of aging portable classrooms. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an average rate of $13 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, extending the current tax rate without increasing it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.443583", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.891992", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.420938", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace outdated electrical wiring; increase internet access; upgrade fire alarms; improve student safety /campus security; and replace aging portables, shall Cajon Valley Union School District\u2019s measure to issue $125 million in bonds be adopted, extending but not increasing the current tax rate (averaging $13/$100,000 of assessed valuation) and raising $6.2 million annually until repaid with legal interest rates, annual audits, independent oversight, all funds spent locally, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and qualifying for State reimbursement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3184, "fingerprint": "2020|202000611|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000611|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a3b0915e903b0517", "measure_id": "202000611", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make student safety and school security improvements; upgrade classroom technology; and construct, rehabilitate, acquire, equip and furnish classrooms and school facilities, shall the San Ysidro School District measure to authorize the issuance of $52,985,000 of bonds to replace bonds previously authorized in 1997, at legal interest rates raising an average $3.2 million per year while bond are outstanding, with projected levies of less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, requiring annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3555, "no_votes": 1517, "total_votes": 5072, "percent_yes": 70.09069400630915, "percent_no": 29.90930599369085, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Ysidro School District to issue $52,985,000 i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Ysidro School District to issue $52,985,000 in bonds to fund student safety improvements, classroom technology upgrades, and construction or rehabilitation of school facilities. The bonds would replace previously authorized bonds from 1997 and be repaid through property tax levies of less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.890792", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.420225", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make student safety and school security improvements; upgrade classroom technology; and construct, rehabilitate, acquire, equip and furnish classrooms and school facilities, shall the San Ysidro School District measure to authorize the issuance of $52,985,000 of bonds to replace bonds previously authorized in 1997, at legal interest rates raising an average $3.2 million per year while bond are outstanding, with projected levies of less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, requiring annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11143, "fingerprint": "2020|202000615|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000615|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ca21501104893631", "measure_id": "202000615", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and campus security; renovate classrooms and educational facilities; increase internet access; and upgrade fire alarms and outdated electric wiring, shall Dehesa School District\u2019s measure authorizing $3.1 million in bonds be adopted with rigorous independent oversight, annual tax rates averaging $30.00/$100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $193,000/year until bonds are repaid), legal interest rates, annual audits, all funds spent locally and not taken by the state and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 492, "no_votes": 814, "total_votes": 1306, "percent_yes": 37.67228177641654, "percent_no": 62.32771822358346, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Dehesa School District to issue $3", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Dehesa School District to issue $3.1 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom renovations, safety upgrades, internet access improvements, and electrical system updates. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes averaging $30 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.444007", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.892291", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.421185", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and campus security; renovate classrooms and educational facilities; increase internet access; and upgrade fire alarms and outdated electric wiring, shall Dehesa School District\u2019s measure authorizing $3.1 million in bonds be adopted with rigorous independent oversight, annual tax rates averaging $30.00/$100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $193,000/year until bonds are repaid), legal interest rates, annual audits, all funds spent locally and not taken by the state and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3185, "fingerprint": "2020|202000612|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000612|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7e7cf9006d771458", "measure_id": "202000612", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reconstruct or replace roofs and plumbing and construct, rehabilitate, replace, acquire, equip and furnish classrooms and school facilities, shall the San Ysidro School District measure to authorize the issuance of $55,500,000 of bonds to replace bonds previously authorized in 1997, at legal interest rates raising an average $3.3 million per year while bond are outstanding, with projected levies of less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, requiring annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3492, "no_votes": 1576, "total_votes": 5068, "percent_yes": 68.90292028413575, "percent_no": 31.097079715864254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Ysidro School District to issue $55", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Ysidro School District to issue $55.5 million in bonds to reconstruct or replace roofs and plumbing systems and to construct, rehabilitate, replace, acquire, equip and furnish classrooms and school facilities. The bonds would replace previously authorized bonds from 1997 and be funded through property tax levies of less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.891081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.420450", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reconstruct or replace roofs and plumbing and construct, rehabilitate, replace, acquire, equip and furnish classrooms and school facilities, shall the San Ysidro School District measure to authorize the issuance of $55,500,000 of bonds to replace bonds previously authorized in 1997, at legal interest rates raising an average $3.3 million per year while bond are outstanding, with projected levies of less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, requiring annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3186, "fingerprint": "2020|202000613|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000613|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b95c7ecbd9a50241", "measure_id": "202000613", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair old, outdated classrooms and school facilities, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, improve student safety and campus security, and upgrade classrooms, labs, facilities and technology to support achievement in science, math, reading, technology, arts and engineering, shall the La Mesa \u2013 Spring Valley School District measure authorizing $136,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 2.4 cents per $100 assessed value ($7,879,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42311, "no_votes": 24497, "total_votes": 66808, "percent_yes": 63.33223566039995, "percent_no": 36.66776433960005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the La Mesa-Spring Valley School District to issue $13...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the La Mesa-Spring Valley School District to issue $136 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, classrooms, and technology infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of approximately 2.4 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.891404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.420694", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair old, outdated classrooms and school facilities, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, improve student safety and campus security, and upgrade classrooms, labs, facilities and technology to support achievement in science, math, reading, technology, arts and engineering, shall the La Mesa \u2013 Spring Valley School District measure authorizing $136,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 2.4 cents per $100 assessed value ($7,879,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3187, "fingerprint": "2020|202000616|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000616|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3492451e19be2286", "measure_id": "202000616", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality schools and upgrade aging facilities, shall Oceanside Unified School District\u2019s measure to: upgrade classrooms for science, technology, engineering, arts, math instruction; address school earthquake, fire, health and safety standards; modernize computers and technology; and repair or replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, heating and cooling systems; by issuing $160,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, providing approximately $9,100,000 annually, levying 3\u023c per $100 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight and audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34514, "no_votes": 21898, "total_votes": 56412, "percent_yes": 61.182018010352415, "percent_no": 38.817981989647585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Oceanside Unified School District to issue $160 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Oceanside Unified School District to issue $160 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, address safety standards, modernize technology, and repair deteriorating infrastructure including roofs, plumbing, electrical, and HVAC systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.892669", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.421426", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality schools and upgrade aging facilities, shall Oceanside Unified School District\u2019s measure to: upgrade classrooms for science, technology, engineering, arts, math instruction; address school earthquake, fire, health and safety standards; modernize computers and technology; and repair or replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, heating and cooling systems; by issuing $160,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, providing approximately $9,100,000 annually, levying 3\u023c per $100 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight and audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3188, "fingerprint": "2020|202000618|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000618|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "92ca529c63d99e7d", "measure_id": "202000618", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Members of the South Bay Union School District Board of Trustees be limited to three (3) elected terms of office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25779, "no_votes": 3925, "total_votes": 29704, "percent_yes": 86.7862914085645, "percent_no": 13.213708591435505, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a three-term limit for elected members of the South ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a three-term limit for elected members of the South Bay Union School District Board of Trustees in San Diego. Board members would be restricted from serving more than three terms in office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.893248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.421893", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Members of the South Bay Union School District Board of Trustees be limited to three (3) elected terms of office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3168, "fingerprint": "2020|202000048|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000048|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d28f7ddea3b1c994", "measure_id": "202000048", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Rincon Community Services District be authorized to establish and levy a special tax override, on all taxable real property within its boundaries for the purpose of providing funds for repair and resurface of the roads maintained by the district, with this special tax not to exceed six dollars per acre, or portion thereof, plus one hundred seventy dollars per parcel of land per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66, "no_votes": 43, "total_votes": 109, "percent_yes": 60.550458715596335, "percent_no": 39.449541284403665, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Rincon Community Services District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Rincon Community Services District to levy a special property tax of up to $6 per acre plus $170 per parcel annually to fund road repair and resurfacing within the district's boundaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.881476", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.414517", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Rincon Community Services District be authorized to establish and levy a special tax override, on all taxable real property within its boundaries for the purpose of providing funds for repair and resurface of the roads maintained by the district, with this special tax not to exceed six dollars per acre, or portion thereof, plus one hundred seventy dollars per parcel of land per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11149, "fingerprint": "2020|202000619|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000619|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3f94ab579b487e63", "measure_id": "202000619", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To fix/repair City College facilities; make necessary seismic retrofit/earthquake safety improvements; make the College more environmentally sustainable through energy efficient buildings/increased renewable energy use; and acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites/equipment to prepare students for well-paid, local science, technology, and arts related jobs, shall San Francisco Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $845,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.1 cents/$100 assessed value ($47,500,000 annually until approximately 2053) be approved, requiring audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 203027, "no_votes": 77436, "total_votes": 280463, "percent_yes": 72.38994091912302, "percent_no": 27.61005908087698, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Francisco Community College District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Francisco Community College District to issue $845 million in bonds to repair and retrofit City College facilities for seismic safety, improve energy efficiency, and construct new facilities and equipment for science, technology, and arts programs. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 1.1 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $47.5 million annually until around 2053.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.448882", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.898561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.425390", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fix/repair City College facilities; make necessary seismic retrofit/earthquake safety improvements; make the College more environmentally sustainable through energy efficient buildings/increased renewable energy use; and acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites/equipment to prepare students for well-paid, local science, technology, and arts related jobs, shall San Francisco Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $845,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.1 cents/$100 assessed value ($47,500,000 annually until approximately 2053) be approved, requiring audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3197, "fingerprint": "2020|202000053|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000053|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "40e8e6a6c7452665", "measure_id": "202000053", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To finance the acquisition or improvement of real property, including to: stabilize, improve, and make permanent investments in supportive housing facilities, shelters, and/or facilities that deliver services to persons experiencing mental health challenges, substance use disorder, and/or homelessness; improve the accessibility, safety and quality of parks, open spaces and recreation facilities; improve the accessibility, safety and condition of the City\u2019s streets and other public right-of-way and related assets; and to pay related costs; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $487,500,000 in general obligation bonds with a duration of up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.014/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of $40,000,000, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits? The City\u2019s current debt management policy is to keep the property tax rate for City general obligation bonds below the 2006 rate by issuing new bonds as older ones are retired and the tax base grows, though this property tax rate may vary based on other factors.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 294117, "no_votes": 122314, "total_votes": 416431, "percent_yes": 70.62802721219121, "percent_no": 29.371972787808787, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized San Francisco to issue $487", "summary_text": "This measure authorized San Francisco to issue $487.5 million in general obligation bonds to finance property acquisition and improvements for supportive housing, mental health and substance abuse facilities, parks and recreation facilities, and street infrastructure. The bonds would have a 30-year duration and be funded through property taxes at an estimated rate of $0.014 per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.896754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.424262", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance the acquisition or improvement of real property, including to: stabilize, improve, and make permanent investments in supportive housing facilities, shelters, and/or facilities that deliver services to persons experiencing mental health challenges, substance use disorder, and/or homelessness; improve the accessibility, safety and quality of parks, open spaces and recreation facilities; improve the accessibility, safety and condition of the City\u2019s streets and other public right-of-way and related assets; and to pay related costs; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $487,500,000 in general obligation bonds with a duration of up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.014/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of $40,000,000, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits? The City\u2019s current debt management policy is to keep the property tax rate for City general obligation bonds below the 2006 rate by issuing new bonds as older ones are retired and the tax base grows, though this property tax rate may vary based on other factors.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11145, "fingerprint": "2020|202000054|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000054|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "aad0b92141d32f6e", "measure_id": "202000054", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Department of Sanitation and Streets with oversight from a Sanitation and Streets Commission, and to establish a Public Works Commission to oversee the Department of Public Works?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 255653, "no_votes": 161178, "total_votes": 416831, "percent_yes": 61.33253044999052, "percent_no": 38.66746955000948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure created a new Department of Sanitation and Streets with oversigh...", "summary_text": "This measure created a new Department of Sanitation and Streets with oversight from a Sanitation and Streets Commission, while establishing a Public Works Commission to oversee the existing Department of Public Works. It restructured San Francisco's public works operations by splitting sanitation and street maintenance functions from other public works activities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.446177", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.894730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.422984", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Department of Sanitation and Streets with oversight from a Sanitation and Streets Commission, and to establish a Public Works Commission to oversee the Department of Public Works?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3190, "fingerprint": "2020|202000049|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000049|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "fd186d08df679783", "measure_id": "202000049", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve fire, earthquake, and emergency response by improving, constructing, and/or replacing: deteriorating cisterns, pipes, and tunnels, and related facilities to ensure firefighters a reliable water supply for fires and disasters; neighborhood fire and police stations and supporting facilities; the City\u2019s 911 Call Center; and other disaster response and public safety facilities, and to pay related costs, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $628,500,000 in general obligation bonds, with a duration up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.015/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of $40,000,000, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233656, "no_votes": 48387, "total_votes": 282043, "percent_yes": 82.84410533145655, "percent_no": 17.155894668543453, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized San Francisco to issue $628", "summary_text": "This measure authorized San Francisco to issue $628.5 million in general obligation bonds to improve and replace fire, earthquake, and emergency response infrastructure including water supply systems, fire and police stations, the 911 Call Center, and other public safety facilities. The bonds would be repaid over up to 30 years through property taxes at an estimated average rate of $0.015 per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.893809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.422345", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve fire, earthquake, and emergency response by improving, constructing, and/or replacing: deteriorating cisterns, pipes, and tunnels, and related facilities to ensure firefighters a reliable water supply for fires and disasters; neighborhood fire and police stations and supporting facilities; the City\u2019s 911 Call Center; and other disaster response and public safety facilities, and to pay related costs, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $628,500,000 in general obligation bonds, with a duration up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.015/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of $40,000,000, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11146, "fingerprint": "2020|202000055|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000055|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3945a268543c8d3b", "measure_id": "202000055", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to remove the requirement that people serving on City boards, commissions and advisory bodies be registered voters and U.S. citizens, and continue to require those people be old enough to vote in City elections and be San Francisco residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 226148, "no_votes": 191898, "total_votes": 418046, "percent_yes": 54.096439147844976, "percent_no": 45.903560852155024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment removed the requirements for U", "summary_text": "This charter amendment removed the requirements for U.S. citizenship and voter registration for people serving on San Francisco city boards, commissions, and advisory bodies. It maintained the existing requirements that appointees be at least 18 years old and San Francisco residents.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.446411", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.895020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.423163", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to remove the requirement that people serving on City boards, commissions and advisory bodies be registered voters and U.S. citizens, and continue to require those people be old enough to vote in City elections and be San Francisco residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3192, "fingerprint": "2020|202000050|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000050|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "692b633625808463", "measure_id": "202000050", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to make retiree health care coverage available to certain City employees who previously worked for the San Francisco Housing Authority based on their combined years of service and date of hire?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 192261, "no_votes": 80268, "total_votes": 272529, "percent_yes": 70.54698766002883, "percent_no": 29.453012339971167, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment extends San Francisco city retiree health care coverag...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment extends San Francisco city retiree health care coverage to certain former San Francisco Housing Authority employees based on their years of service and hire date.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.894458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.422803", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to make retiree health care coverage available to certain City employees who previously worked for the San Francisco Housing Authority based on their combined years of service and date of hire?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11148, "fingerprint": "2020|202000051|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000051|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1789eecb8aab840d", "measure_id": "202000051", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City tax owners or tenants who keep ground floor retail or other commercial space vacant in some areas of San Francisco, at rates of between $250 and $1,000 per street-facing foot, starting January 1, 2021 and without any expiration date, and use the annual revenues, estimated at a range of a minimal amount to $5 million, to assist small businesses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 195059, "no_votes": 83248, "total_votes": 278307, "percent_yes": 70.08770889700942, "percent_no": 29.91229110299058, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a tax of $250 to $1,000 per street-facing foot on owners...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a tax of $250 to $1,000 per street-facing foot on owners or tenants who keep ground floor retail or commercial space vacant in certain areas of San Francisco. The estimated annual revenues of up to $5 million would be used to assist small businesses.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.447956", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.897074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.424466", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City tax owners or tenants who keep ground floor retail or other commercial space vacant in some areas of San Francisco, at rates of between $250 and $1,000 per street-facing foot, starting January 1, 2021 and without any expiration date, and use the annual revenues, estimated at a range of a minimal amount to $5 million, to assist small businesses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3193, "fingerprint": "2020|202000056|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000056|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b965ca6e47a4cba3", "measure_id": "202000056", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Sheriff\u2019s Department Office of Inspector General and a Sheriff\u2019s Department Oversight Board that would make recommendations to the Sheriff and the Board of Supervisors about the operations of the Sheriff\u2019s Department?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 276685, "no_votes": 136896, "total_votes": 413581, "percent_yes": 66.8998334062735, "percent_no": 33.1001665937265, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure creates a Sheriff's Department Office of Inspector General and Ov...", "summary_text": "The measure creates a Sheriff's Department Office of Inspector General and Oversight Board to monitor and make recommendations about the Sheriff's Department's operations to the Sheriff and Board of Supervisors.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.895295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.423353", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Sheriff\u2019s Department Office of Inspector General and a Sheriff\u2019s Department Oversight Board that would make recommendations to the Sheriff and the Board of Supervisors about the operations of the Sheriff\u2019s Department?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11147, "fingerprint": "2020|202000052|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000052|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "651f407a958324dc", "measure_id": "202000052", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City tie annual square-footage allotment for certain Large Office Projects to whether the City is meeting its Affordable Housing Goals, and change the criteria for approving certain office projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 151293, "no_votes": 120626, "total_votes": 271919, "percent_yes": 55.63899543614092, "percent_no": 44.36100456385908, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure ties the annual square-footage allotment for large office projec...", "summary_text": "This measure ties the annual square-footage allotment for large office projects to whether San Francisco is meeting its affordable housing goals and changes the approval criteria for certain office projects.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.447327", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.896113", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.423904", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City tie annual square-footage allotment for certain Large Office Projects to whether the City is meeting its Affordable Housing Goals, and change the criteria for approving certain office projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3191, "fingerprint": "2020|202000057|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000057|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9acb5837818b945f", "measure_id": "202000057", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to remove the requirement that the San Francisco Police Department maintain a minimum of 1,971 full-duty sworn police officers and replace the requirement with regular evaluations of police staffing levels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 299528, "no_votes": 120246, "total_votes": 419774, "percent_yes": 71.3545860391544, "percent_no": 28.6454139608456, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure removed the Charter requirement that the San Francisco Police De...", "summary_text": "This measure removed the Charter requirement that the San Francisco Police Department maintain at least 1,971 full-duty sworn officers and replaced it with a system of regular staffing evaluations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.894084", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.422586", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to remove the requirement that the San Francisco Police Department maintain a minimum of 1,971 full-duty sworn police officers and replace the requirement with regular evaluations of police staffing levels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3198, "fingerprint": "2020|202000058|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000058|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "92b3d9b5f33b086e", "measure_id": "202000058", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City eliminate the payroll expense tax; permanently increase the registration fee for some businesses by $230\u2013460, decreasing it for others; permanently increase gross receipts tax rates to 0.105\u20131.040%, exempting more small businesses; permanently increase the administrative office tax rate to 1.61%; if the City loses certain lawsuits, increase gross receipts tax rates on some businesses by 0.175\u20130.690% and the administrative office tax rate by 1.5%, and place a new 1% or 3.5% tax on gross receipts from commercial leases, for 20 years; and make other business tax changes; for estimated annual revenue of $97 million?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 273953, "no_votes": 132024, "total_votes": 405977, "percent_yes": 67.47993112910338, "percent_no": 32.52006887089662, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure eliminated San Francisco's payroll expense tax and restructured ...", "summary_text": "This measure eliminated San Francisco's payroll expense tax and restructured business taxes by increasing gross receipts tax rates to 0.105\u20131.040% while exempting more small businesses, adjusting registration fees, and raising the administrative office tax rate to 1.61%. The measure also included contingency provisions that would impose additional taxes on businesses and commercial leases for 20 years if the city loses certain lawsuits, with an estimated annual revenue of $97 million.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.897361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.424646", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City eliminate the payroll expense tax; permanently increase the registration fee for some businesses by $230\u2013460, decreasing it for others; permanently increase gross receipts tax rates to 0.105\u20131.040%, exempting more small businesses; permanently increase the administrative office tax rate to 1.61%; if the City loses certain lawsuits, increase gross receipts tax rates on some businesses by 0.175\u20130.690% and the administrative office tax rate by 1.5%, and place a new 1% or 3.5% tax on gross receipts from commercial leases, for 20 years; and make other business tax changes; for estimated annual revenue of $97 million?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3194, "fingerprint": "2020|202000059|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000059|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "7180f2376342caa8", "measure_id": "202000059", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to allow San Francisco residents to vote for local candidates and local ballot measures if they are U.S. citizens, at least 16 years old and registered to vote?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 207054, "no_votes": 213694, "total_votes": 420748, "percent_yes": 49.21092910720906, "percent_no": 50.78907089279094, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended San Francisco's Charter to lower the voting a...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended San Francisco's Charter to lower the voting age from 18 to 16 for local elections, allowing U.S. citizens who are at least 16 years old and registered to vote in city candidate races and on local ballot measures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.895575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.423545", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to allow San Francisco residents to vote for local candidates and local ballot measures if they are U.S. citizens, at least 16 years old and registered to vote?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3189, "fingerprint": "2020|202000060|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000060|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2a2409700dd20713", "measure_id": "202000060", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City change the Planning Code for neighborhood commercial districts to increase permissible uses, eliminate public notification processes for new permitted uses, and require an expedited process for permits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 247428, "no_votes": 159026, "total_votes": 406454, "percent_yes": 60.8747853385623, "percent_no": 39.1252146614377, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed San Francisco's Planning Code to expand the types of bus...", "summary_text": "This measure changed San Francisco's Planning Code to expand the types of businesses allowed in neighborhood commercial districts, remove public notification requirements for new permitted uses, and mandate faster permit processing.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.893524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.422118", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change the Planning Code for neighborhood commercial districts to increase permissible uses, eliminate public notification processes for new permitted uses, and require an expedited process for permits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3199, "fingerprint": "2020|202000061|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000061|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "4af6e8e8535075cd", "measure_id": "202000061", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City permanently increase the transfer tax rate on sales and leases of 35 years or more of real estate, to 5.50% on those transactions of $10 million to $25 million, and to 6.00% on those transactions of $25 million or more, for an estimated average revenue of $196 million a year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 235884, "no_votes": 173984, "total_votes": 409868, "percent_yes": 57.55121160959138, "percent_no": 42.44878839040862, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure permanently increased San Francisco's real estate transfer tax r...", "summary_text": "This measure permanently increased San Francisco's real estate transfer tax rates to 5.50% on transactions between $10-25 million and 6.00% on transactions over $25 million, applying to sales and long-term leases of 35+ years. The change was projected to generate approximately $196 million in annual revenue for the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.897637", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.424835", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City permanently increase the transfer tax rate on sales and leases of 35 years or more of real estate, to 5.50% on those transactions of $10 million to $25 million, and to 6.00% on those transactions of $25 million or more, for an estimated average revenue of $196 million a year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3200, "fingerprint": "2020|202000062|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000062|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "7708428886b55303", "measure_id": "202000062", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City replace its 2018 Parcel Tax for the San Francisco Unified School District with a new tax that changes the annual tax rate from $320 per parcel to $288 per parcel, adjusted for inflation each year, and with an exemption for people age 65 or older, until June 30, 2038, for an estimated revenue of $48.1 million a year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 300775, "no_votes": 103315, "total_votes": 404090, "percent_yes": 74.43267588903461, "percent_no": 25.567324110965387, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure replaced San Francisco's 2018 school parcel tax with a new tax t...", "summary_text": "This measure replaced San Francisco's 2018 school parcel tax with a new tax that reduced the rate from $320 to $288 per parcel annually, added annual inflation adjustments and a senior exemption, and extended the tax until 2038. The new tax was projected to generate approximately $48.1 million per year for the San Francisco Unified School District.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.897911", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.425016", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City replace its 2018 Parcel Tax for the San Francisco Unified School District with a new tax that changes the annual tax rate from $320 per parcel to $288 per parcel, adjusted for inflation each year, and with an exemption for people age 65 or older, until June 30, 2038, for an estimated revenue of $48.1 million a year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3196, "fingerprint": "2020|202000063|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000063|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "5559842945805781", "measure_id": "202000063", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City have the authority to own, develop, construct, acquire or rehabilitate up to 10,000 units of low-income rental housing in San Francisco?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 303319, "no_votes": 109220, "total_votes": 412539, "percent_yes": 73.52492734020298, "percent_no": 26.47507265979702, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes San Francisco to own, develop, construct, acquire, or...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes San Francisco to own, develop, construct, acquire, or rehabilitate up to 10,000 units of low-income rental housing. It grants the city legal authority to directly participate in creating and managing affordable housing units.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.896391", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.424084", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City have the authority to own, develop, construct, acquire or rehabilitate up to 10,000 units of low-income rental housing in San Francisco?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3201, "fingerprint": "2020|202000064|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000064|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "87caa4f4c68d3663", "measure_id": "202000064", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City place an additional tax permanently on some businesses in San Francisco when their highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median compensation paid to their employees in San Francisco, where the additional tax rate would be between 0.1%\u20130.6% of gross receipts or between 0.4%\u20132.4% of payroll expense for those businesses in San Francisco, for an estimated revenue of between $60-140 million a year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 268370, "no_votes": 144097, "total_votes": 412467, "percent_yes": 65.06459910732254, "percent_no": 34.935400892677464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposes an additional tax on San Francisco businesses where the ...", "summary_text": "This measure imposes an additional tax on San Francisco businesses where the highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median compensation of their San Francisco employees. The tax rate ranges from 0.1%-0.6% of gross receipts or 0.4%-2.4% of payroll expenses, with estimated annual revenue of $60-140 million.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.898184", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.425197", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City place an additional tax permanently on some businesses in San Francisco when their highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median compensation paid to their employees in San Francisco, where the additional tax rate would be between 0.1%\u20130.6% of gross receipts or between 0.4%\u20132.4% of payroll expense for those businesses in San Francisco, for an estimated revenue of between $60-140 million a year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3195, "fingerprint": "2020|202000065|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000065|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3eccb7db899862ea", "measure_id": "202000065", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To preserve Caltrain service and support regional economic recovery, prevent traffic congestion, make Caltrain more affordable and accessible, reduce air pollution with cleaner and quieter electric trains, make travel times faster, and increase Caltrain frequency and capacity between Santa Clara, San Mateo and San Francisco counties, shall the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board's resolution levying a 30-year one-eighth cent sales tax with oversight and audits, providing approximately $100 million annually for Caltrain that the State cannot take away, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 300438, "no_votes": 109056, "total_votes": 409494, "percent_yes": 73.36810795762575, "percent_no": 26.631892042374247, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a one-eighth cent sales tax for 30 years to fund Caltrai...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a one-eighth cent sales tax for 30 years to fund Caltrain operations and improvements, generating approximately $100 million annually for the regional rail system serving Santa Clara, San Mateo, and San Francisco counties. The funding supports service preservation, electrification, increased frequency, and system accessibility improvements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.895845", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.423723", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve Caltrain service and support regional economic recovery, prevent traffic congestion, make Caltrain more affordable and accessible, reduce air pollution with cleaner and quieter electric trains, make travel times faster, and increase Caltrain frequency and capacity between Santa Clara, San Mateo and San Francisco counties, shall the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board's resolution levying a 30-year one-eighth cent sales tax with oversight and audits, providing approximately $100 million annually for Caltrain that the State cannot take away, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3210, "fingerprint": "2020|202000622|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000622|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "a0f9e7fb1dd4b26c", "measure_id": "202000622", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms and school facilities for safe in-person learning; improve campus security/ emergency communication systems; repair/replace aging electrical, heating/ventilation, roofs, and plumbing; and update job training facilities/equipment, shall Manteca Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $260,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 4.5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, raising approximately $13,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent oversight/audits and all funds benefiting local schools?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30134, "no_votes": 22124, "total_votes": 52258, "percent_yes": 57.66389835049179, "percent_no": 42.33610164950821, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Manteca Unified School District to issue $260 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Manteca Unified School District to issue $260 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, improve campus security systems, repair aging infrastructure like electrical and HVAC systems, and update job training facilities. The bonds would be funded through a property tax levy of 4.5 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $13.9 million annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.901467", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.427075", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms and school facilities for safe in-person learning; improve campus security/ emergency communication systems; repair/replace aging electrical, heating/ventilation, roofs, and plumbing; and update job training facilities/equipment, shall Manteca Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $260,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 4.5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, raising approximately $13,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent oversight/audits and all funds benefiting local schools?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3208, "fingerprint": "2020|202000620|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000620|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "098f99c748b11b49", "measure_id": "202000620", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety/campus security systems; repair/replace old electrical, heating/ventilation, roofs, and plumbing; upgrade/construct classrooms to meet academic standards; and help local schools qualify for state matching funds, shall Manteca Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $260,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, raising approximately $16,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent oversight/audits and all funds benefiting local schools?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13124, "no_votes": 12896, "total_votes": 26020, "percent_yes": 50.4381245196003, "percent_no": 49.5618754803997, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Manteca Unified School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Manteca Unified School District to issue $260 million in bonds to fund campus safety improvements, repairs to electrical systems, heating, roofs and plumbing, and classroom upgrades. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $16.5 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.900813", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.426710", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety/campus security systems; repair/replace old electrical, heating/ventilation, roofs, and plumbing; upgrade/construct classrooms to meet academic standards; and help local schools qualify for state matching funds, shall Manteca Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $260,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, raising approximately $16,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent oversight/audits and all funds benefiting local schools?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3204, "fingerprint": "2020|202000355|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000355|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "57ec946eb795a35d", "measure_id": "202000355", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted enacting a one\u2010half cent (1/2%) special transactions and use (sales) tax for ten (10) years, generating approximately $280,000 annually in dedicated revenue that shall be used solely for the Escalon Police Department for maintaining and enhancing staffing levels, as well as funding police training, capital, equipment and operating budget?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1195, "no_votes": 924, "total_votes": 2119, "percent_yes": 56.39452571967909, "percent_no": 43.60547428032091, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have enacted a 0.5% sales tax in Escalon for ten years to generate approximately $280,000 annually dedicated solely to funding the Escalon Police Department's staffing, training, equipment, and operations. The measure failed despite receiving 56.4% support, likely requiring a two-thirds majority for approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.899640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.425957", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted enacting a one\u2010half cent (1/2%) special transactions and use (sales) tax for ten (10) years, generating approximately $280,000 annually in dedicated revenue that shall be used solely for the Escalon Police Department for maintaining and enhancing staffing levels, as well as funding police training, capital, equipment and operating budget?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3205, "fingerprint": "2020|202000356|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000356|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "1634b799e27361a8", "measure_id": "202000356", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on December 12, 2019 by the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the annexation to the City of Tracy of the territory described in that order and designated as Tracy Village Reorganization be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14, "no_votes": 8, "total_votes": 22, "percent_yes": 63.63636363636363, "percent_no": 36.36363636363637, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure confirms the annexation of territory designated as Tracy Village ...", "summary_text": "The measure confirms the annexation of territory designated as Tracy Village Reorganization to the City of Tracy, as previously ordered by the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission in December 2019.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-08-25", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.899983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.426145", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on December 12, 2019 by the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the annexation to the City of Tracy of the territory described in that order and designated as Tracy Village Reorganization be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3209, "fingerprint": "2020|202000621|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000621|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "9f7e741c6fbe85eb", "measure_id": "202000621", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall a portion of Tracy Unified School District and the Banta Elementary School District be unified to form the Banta Unified School District with a five-member board elected at large?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1935, "no_votes": 626, "total_votes": 2561, "percent_yes": 75.55642327215931, "percent_no": 24.443576727840693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure unified a portion of Tracy Unified School District with Banta El...", "summary_text": "This measure unified a portion of Tracy Unified School District with Banta Elementary School District to create the new Banta Unified School District, governed by a five-member board elected at large.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.901088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.426896", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a portion of Tracy Unified School District and the Banta Elementary School District be unified to form the Banta Unified School District with a five-member board elected at large?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3207, "fingerprint": "2020|202000358|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000358|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "7c0b873c086e10fb", "measure_id": "202000358", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City adopt an ordinance imposing a general tax on cannabis businesses, including hemp, not to exceed $12.00 per canopy square footfor cultivation (adjusted forinflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for all other businesses; estimated to generate $350,000 to $700,000 annually for Tracy until voters change or repeal it, to fund core City services such as public safety, public works, parks, and community services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22554, "no_votes": 13161, "total_votes": 35715, "percent_yes": 63.14993700125997, "percent_no": 36.85006299874003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a general tax on cannabis businesses in Tracy, Californi...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a general tax on cannabis businesses in Tracy, California, with rates up to $12 per square foot for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis businesses. The tax was estimated to generate $350,000 to $700,000 annually to fund city services including public safety, public works, parks, and community services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.900537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.426527", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City adopt an ordinance imposing a general tax on cannabis businesses, including hemp, not to exceed $12.00 per canopy square footfor cultivation (adjusted forinflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for all other businesses; estimated to generate $350,000 to $700,000 annually for Tracy until voters change or repeal it, to fund core City services such as public safety, public works, parks, and community services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3202, "fingerprint": "2020|202000066|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000066|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "78ab92210e70e9f1", "measure_id": "202000066", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure supporting early childhood education and youth programs, including literacy, gang reduction, after-school programs, and drug prevention, with emphasis on children facing the greatest disparities, and promoting public health, homeless mitigation, and enforcing cannabis laws; imposing a special tax on commercial cannabis businesses in unincorporated San Joaquin County at a rate of 3.5% to 8% of gross receipts, including a $2.00 cultivation Square Footage Payment be adopted? (Annual revenue estimate: $250,000.00) (Duration: Until repealed.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 177557, "no_votes": 96926, "total_votes": 274483, "percent_yes": 64.6877948725422, "percent_no": 35.3122051274578, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would impose a special tax of 3", "summary_text": "This measure would impose a special tax of 3.5% to 8% of gross receipts on commercial cannabis businesses in unincorporated San Joaquin County, plus a $2 per square foot cultivation fee, to fund early childhood education, youth programs, public health initiatives, and cannabis law enforcement. The measure failed despite receiving 64.7% yes votes, likely because it required a two-thirds supermajority to pass as a special tax.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.899079", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.425583", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure supporting early childhood education and youth programs, including literacy, gang reduction, after-school programs, and drug prevention, with emphasis on children facing the greatest disparities, and promoting public health, homeless mitigation, and enforcing cannabis laws; imposing a special tax on commercial cannabis businesses in unincorporated San Joaquin County at a rate of 3.5% to 8% of gross receipts, including a $2.00 cultivation Square Footage Payment be adopted? (Annual revenue estimate: $250,000.00) (Duration: Until repealed.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3203, "fingerprint": "2020|202000359|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000359|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "6ddf8b471962401d", "measure_id": "202000359", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Tracy adopt an ordinance exempting development projects in transit oriented development areas near commuter rail (e.g. Valleylink) that designate at least 10% of dwelling units for rent or sale as affordable workforce housing based on the City of Tracy's area median income (adjusted for household size) from the City's Growth Management Ordinance, with the exemption limited to 2,200 units per transit oriented development area, to preserve and maintain community character?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15934, "no_votes": 19155, "total_votes": 35089, "percent_yes": 45.4102425261478, "percent_no": 54.5897574738522, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have exempted certain housing development projects near co...", "summary_text": "This measure would have exempted certain housing development projects near commuter rail stations from Tracy's Growth Management Ordinance, provided they designate at least 10% of units as affordable workforce housing, with exemptions limited to 2,200 units per transit area. The measure failed with 45.4% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.899358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.425771", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Tracy adopt an ordinance exempting development projects in transit oriented development areas near commuter rail (e.g. Valleylink) that designate at least 10% of dwelling units for rent or sale as affordable workforce housing based on the City of Tracy's area median income (adjusted for household size) from the City's Growth Management Ordinance, with the exemption limited to 2,200 units per transit oriented development area, to preserve and maintain community character?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3206, "fingerprint": "2020|202000357|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000357|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "446d087b3261feff", "measure_id": "202000357", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance to maintain City of Manteca services, such as fire protection; emergency response times/disaster preparedness; keeping public spaces safe/clean; pothole/street repairs; crime prevention; local business/jobs support; youth/teen recreation and after-school programs; and other general services, by establishing a 1\u00a2 per dollar (1.0%) sales tax until ended by voters, generating approximately $12,000,000 annually, with independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16091, "no_votes": 17467, "total_votes": 33558, "percent_yes": 47.9498182251624, "percent_no": 52.0501817748376, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 1% sales tax in Manteca to fund various...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 1% sales tax in Manteca to fund various city services including fire protection, emergency response, street repairs, crime prevention, and youth programs, generating approximately $12 million annually with citizen oversight until repealed by voters. The measure failed with 47.9% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.900258", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.426341", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance to maintain City of Manteca services, such as fire protection; emergency response times/disaster preparedness; keeping public spaces safe/clean; pothole/street repairs; crime prevention; local business/jobs support; youth/teen recreation and after-school programs; and other general services, by establishing a 1\u00a2 per dollar (1.0%) sales tax until ended by voters, generating approximately $12,000,000 annually, with independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3211, "fingerprint": "2020|202000067|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000067|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "aa0069178cc542c4", "measure_id": "202000067", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain rapid response times for 911 medical emergency/fire protection services, provide 24-hours a day, 7-days a week staffed medical emergency/fire vehicles, shall Oceano Community Services District Ordinance No. 2020-1 levying an annual special tax of $180.00 per parcel, providing $422,000 a year, subject to annual maximum increases capped at 2%, until repealed by voters, and requiring independent citizen oversight and annual reports, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1294, "no_votes": 663, "total_votes": 1957, "percent_yes": 66.12161471640266, "percent_no": 33.87838528359734, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an annual special tax of $180 per parcel in t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an annual special tax of $180 per parcel in the Oceano Community Services District to fund 24/7 staffed medical emergency and fire protection services, generating approximately $422,000 annually with annual increases capped at 2%. The measure failed despite receiving 66.1% approval because it required a two-thirds majority to pass.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.901815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.427270", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain rapid response times for 911 medical emergency/fire protection services, provide 24-hours a day, 7-days a week staffed medical emergency/fire vehicles, shall Oceano Community Services District Ordinance No. 2020-1 levying an annual special tax of $180.00 per parcel, providing $422,000 a year, subject to annual maximum increases capped at 2%, until repealed by voters, and requiring independent citizen oversight and annual reports, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3216, "fingerprint": "2020|202000364|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000364|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "c334cf0e9ae2aa30", "measure_id": "202000364", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain police and firefighter service levels; reduce 911 emergency response times; protect local groundwater and beaches; and enhance senior programming and other essential services, shall the hotel/visitor tax be increased by 1%, paid by visitors, generating approximately $1 million annually, until ended by voters, requiring annual audits and local control of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4350, "no_votes": 1032, "total_votes": 5382, "percent_yes": 80.82497212931996, "percent_no": 19.17502787068004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased San Luis Obispo's hotel/visitor tax by 1% to generate ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased San Luis Obispo's hotel/visitor tax by 1% to generate approximately $1 million annually for city services including police, fire, emergency response, environmental protection, and senior programs. The tax increase requires annual audits and can only be ended by voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.903286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.428229", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain police and firefighter service levels; reduce 911 emergency response times; protect local groundwater and beaches; and enhance senior programming and other essential services, shall the hotel/visitor tax be increased by 1%, paid by visitors, generating approximately $1 million annually, until ended by voters, requiring annual audits and local control of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3218, "fingerprint": "2020|202000623|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000623|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "c955b53ddaa305ea", "measure_id": "202000623", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To expand vocational/career education facilities for programs including engineering, technology, robotics, construction trades and agricultural science; improve school security/student safety; upgrade school emergency preparedness; build additional school facilities as needed; and create local construction jobs; shall Atascadero Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $40 million of bonds with legal interest rates, levies averaging less than five cents per $100 assessed valuation for 14 years ($3.3 million/year for bond repayment), annual audits and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11417, "no_votes": 9572, "total_votes": 20989, "percent_yes": 54.395159369193394, "percent_no": 45.604840630806606, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized Atascadero Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized Atascadero Unified School District to issue $40 million in bonds to expand vocational and career education facilities, improve school security and emergency preparedness, and build additional school facilities as needed. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies averaging less than five cents per $100 of assessed valuation over 14 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.903937", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.428601", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand vocational/career education facilities for programs including engineering, technology, robotics, construction trades and agricultural science; improve school security/student safety; upgrade school emergency preparedness; build additional school facilities as needed; and create local construction jobs; shall Atascadero Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $40 million of bonds with legal interest rates, levies averaging less than five cents per $100 assessed valuation for 14 years ($3.3 million/year for bond repayment), annual audits and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3213, "fingerprint": "2020|202000360|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000360|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "c38321f34abf05bc", "measure_id": "202000360", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for fire protection, paramedics, and 911 emergency response, police, crime prevention and investigations, maintenance of parks, public facilities and infrastructure, graffiti removal, and recreation, community services, and other general city services in the City of Atascadero, shall an ordinance establishing a one-percent sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4.5 million dollars annually for city services until ended by voters, with annual independent audits ensuring money is spent properly, and all money locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9843, "no_votes": 6955, "total_votes": 16798, "percent_yes": 58.59626145969759, "percent_no": 41.40373854030241, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a one-percent sales tax in Atascadero to fund fire p...", "summary_text": "This measure established a one-percent sales tax in Atascadero to fund fire protection, paramedics, emergency response, police services, parks maintenance, infrastructure, and other general city services. The tax generates approximately $4.5 million annually with required independent audits and continues until voters decide to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.902375", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.427674", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for fire protection, paramedics, and 911 emergency response, police, crime prevention and investigations, maintenance of parks, public facilities and infrastructure, graffiti removal, and recreation, community services, and other general city services in the City of Atascadero, shall an ordinance establishing a one-percent sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4.5 million dollars annually for city services until ended by voters, with annual independent audits ensuring money is spent properly, and all money locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3215, "fingerprint": "2020|202000362|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000362|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "4a9e5b5b906d919a", "measure_id": "202000362", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect City of Morro Bay's financial stability, local property values and City services, such as maintaining Morro Bay's local Fire/Police Departments, 24/7 paramedics, 911 emergency response, health emergency/disaster preparedness; keeping beaches, public areas safe/clean; retaining/attracting businesses; and other general City services, shall the measure establishing 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $2,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring independent audits, public oversight, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4113, "no_votes": 2912, "total_votes": 7025, "percent_yes": 58.54804270462633, "percent_no": 41.45195729537367, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Morro Bay to generate approxim...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Morro Bay to generate approximately $2 million annually for general city services including fire, police, paramedics, emergency response, beach maintenance, and business retention. The tax requires independent audits and public oversight, with all funds designated for local use until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.903014", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.428039", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect City of Morro Bay's financial stability, local property values and City services, such as maintaining Morro Bay's local Fire/Police Departments, 24/7 paramedics, 911 emergency response, health emergency/disaster preparedness; keeping beaches, public areas safe/clean; retaining/attracting businesses; and other general City services, shall the measure establishing 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $2,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring independent audits, public oversight, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3214, "fingerprint": "2020|202000361|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000361|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "6492e4acbe5a0e6b", "measure_id": "202000361", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for maintaining major streets and sidewalks, supporting local business recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, maintaining essential 9-1-1 emergency medical and fire services, property crime and youth violence prevention, and neighborhood policing services, and other general city services; shall the City of Grover Beach enact a 1% Transaction and Use Tax (Sales Tax) with public oversight providing $1,800,000 annually to the general fund unless repealed by voters with all funds staying in Grover Beach?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3347, "no_votes": 3006, "total_votes": 6353, "percent_yes": 52.68377144656068, "percent_no": 47.31622855343932, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 1% sales tax in Grover Beach to generate approximately...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 1% sales tax in Grover Beach to generate approximately $1,800,000 annually for the city's general fund to support various municipal services including street maintenance, emergency services, crime prevention, and business recovery. The tax includes public oversight provisions and requires voter approval to repeal.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.902735", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.427855", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for maintaining major streets and sidewalks, supporting local business recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, maintaining essential 9-1-1 emergency medical and fire services, property crime and youth violence prevention, and neighborhood policing services, and other general city services; shall the City of Grover Beach enact a 1% Transaction and Use Tax (Sales Tax) with public oversight providing $1,800,000 annually to the general fund unless repealed by voters with all funds staying in Grover Beach?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3217, "fingerprint": "2020|202000365|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000365|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "9e25576b536356a2", "measure_id": "202000365", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance to provide funding to protect City of San Luis Obispo\u2019s financial stability; maintain fire/community safety, health emergency/disaster preparedness; protect creeks from pollution; address homelessness; keep public areas clean/safe; retain local businesses; maintain youth/senior services, streets, open space/natural areas, and other general services, by extending voter-approved funding at a 1.5\u00a2 rate, providing approximately $21,600,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits/all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14513, "no_votes": 10410, "total_votes": 24923, "percent_yes": 58.23135256590298, "percent_no": 41.76864743409702, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended an existing 1", "summary_text": "This measure extended an existing 1.5-cent sales tax in San Luis Obispo to fund various city services including fire safety, emergency preparedness, environmental protection, homelessness programs, and infrastructure maintenance. The tax generates approximately $21.6 million annually and remains in effect until voters decide to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.903565", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.428411", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance to provide funding to protect City of San Luis Obispo\u2019s financial stability; maintain fire/community safety, health emergency/disaster preparedness; protect creeks from pollution; address homelessness; keep public areas clean/safe; retain local businesses; maintain youth/senior services, streets, open space/natural areas, and other general services, by extending voter-approved funding at a 1.5\u00a2 rate, providing approximately $21,600,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits/all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3220, "fingerprint": "2020|202000625|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000625|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "d2c6b51f3d80e218", "measure_id": "202000625", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "With no projected increase in current tax rates, shall Shandon Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure to repair deteriorating septic systems, improve student safety, upgrade technology and provide additional classrooms by authorizing $4 million in bonds be adopted with legal rates, levies averaging less than $0.04 per $100 of assessed valuation through 2048 (generating $260,000 per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no funds used for administrators\u2019 salaries or benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 351, "no_votes": 210, "total_votes": 561, "percent_yes": 62.56684491978609, "percent_no": 37.43315508021391, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Shandon Joint Unified School District to issue $4...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Shandon Joint Unified School District to issue $4 million in bonds to repair septic systems, improve safety, upgrade technology, and add classrooms. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging less than $0.04 per $100 of assessed valuation through 2048.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.904503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.428978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "With no projected increase in current tax rates, shall Shandon Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure to repair deteriorating septic systems, improve student safety, upgrade technology and provide additional classrooms by authorizing $4 million in bonds be adopted with legal rates, levies averaging less than $0.04 per $100 of assessed valuation through 2048 (generating $260,000 per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no funds used for administrators\u2019 salaries or benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3219, "fingerprint": "2020|202000624|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000624|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "b3c9e12ebe306006", "measure_id": "202000624", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "With no increase in estimated tax rates, shall San Miguel Joint Union School District\u2019s measure to retrofit classrooms for agricultural sciences, student safety and school security; upgrade emergency preparedness; and increase student access to internet/ technology at Lillian Larsen and Cappy Culver Schools be adopted, authorizing $6,200,000 in bonds, extending but not increasing current rates (3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding) and raising $580,000/ year for bond repayment with legal interest rates, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1460, "no_votes": 1186, "total_votes": 2646, "percent_yes": 55.17762660619804, "percent_no": 44.82237339380196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Miguel Joint Union School District to issue $...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Miguel Joint Union School District to issue $6,200,000 in bonds to retrofit classrooms for agricultural sciences, improve student safety and security, upgrade emergency preparedness, and increase internet/technology access at two schools. The measure extended existing tax rates at 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation without increasing them.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.904220", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.428792", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "With no increase in estimated tax rates, shall San Miguel Joint Union School District\u2019s measure to retrofit classrooms for agricultural sciences, student safety and school security; upgrade emergency preparedness; and increase student access to internet/ technology at Lillian Larsen and Cappy Culver Schools be adopted, authorizing $6,200,000 in bonds, extending but not increasing current rates (3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding) and raising $580,000/ year for bond repayment with legal interest rates, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3212, "fingerprint": "2020|202000363|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000363|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "b8e8d8f07a6646f0", "measure_id": "202000363", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential/general services, such as fire protection/paramedic services; wildfire/natural disaster emergency preparedness; 911 emergency response times; public safety; equipping first responders; fixing streets/potholes; school protective services, shall the City of Paso Robles adopt a measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $10,000,000 annually, expiring in 12 years unless ended earlier by voters, requiring annual audits, independent citizen oversight, public spending disclosure, and all funds only for Paso Robles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8410, "no_votes": 6459, "total_votes": 14869, "percent_yes": 56.56062949761248, "percent_no": 43.43937050238752, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Paso Robles to fund general ci...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Paso Robles to fund general city services including fire protection, emergency response, public safety, and street maintenance, generating approximately $10 million annually for 12 years. The measure includes requirements for annual audits, citizen oversight, and public spending disclosure with all funds restricted to use within Paso Robles.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.902100", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.427479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential/general services, such as fire protection/paramedic services; wildfire/natural disaster emergency preparedness; 911 emergency response times; public safety; equipping first responders; fixing streets/potholes; school protective services, shall the City of Paso Robles adopt a measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $10,000,000 annually, expiring in 12 years unless ended earlier by voters, requiring annual audits, independent citizen oversight, public spending disclosure, and all funds only for Paso Robles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3225, "fingerprint": "2020|202000366|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000366|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "baa2da5120a5b720", "measure_id": "202000366", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Herb Perez be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember of the City of Foster City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7393, "no_votes": 2173, "total_votes": 9566, "percent_yes": 77.28413129834831, "percent_no": 22.715868701651686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Herb Perez from his posi...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Herb Perez from his position as a Foster City councilmember. The recall passed with 77.3% of voters supporting his removal from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.905986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.429903", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Herb Perez be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember of the City of Foster City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3233, "fingerprint": "2020|202000628|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000628|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d5a1dead1ed23009", "measure_id": "202000628", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to repair, upgrade and construct classrooms, administration centers and educational facilities at Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor and Adult-Ed High Schools; shall Jefferson Union High School District's measure to reauthorize as new bonds $28.39 million of bonds approved by voters in 2014 with legal rates, estimated average annual levies less than $0.01 per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $1.9 million dollars/year), annual audits and independent oversight be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21062, "no_votes": 12327, "total_votes": 33389, "percent_yes": 63.08065530563957, "percent_no": 36.91934469436043, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reauthorized $28", "summary_text": "This measure reauthorized $28.39 million in bonds previously approved by voters in 2014 for the Jefferson Union High School District to repair, upgrade and construct facilities at six high schools. The bonds would be funded through property tax levies estimated at less than $0.01 per $100 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.908696", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.431566", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to repair, upgrade and construct classrooms, administration centers and educational facilities at Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor and Adult-Ed High Schools; shall Jefferson Union High School District's measure to reauthorize as new bonds $28.39 million of bonds approved by voters in 2014 with legal rates, estimated average annual levies less than $0.01 per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $1.9 million dollars/year), annual audits and independent oversight be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3231, "fingerprint": "2020|202000626|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000626|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b4014e38a17ea549", "measure_id": "202000626", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make campus security and safety improvements; renovate classrooms, buildings and utility systems; replace roofs; install air conditioning units; make technology improvements; and improve access for students with disabilities, shall the Brisbane School District measure authorizing $27,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, be adopted, levying approximately 2.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($1,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1739, "no_votes": 956, "total_votes": 2695, "percent_yes": 64.52690166975881, "percent_no": 35.473098330241186, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Brisbane School District to issue $27 million in ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Brisbane School District to issue $27 million in bonds to fund campus security improvements, classroom and building renovations, utility system upgrades, roof replacements, air conditioning installations, technology improvements, and disability access enhancements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of approximately 2.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.908089", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.431199", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make campus security and safety improvements; renovate classrooms, buildings and utility systems; replace roofs; install air conditioning units; make technology improvements; and improve access for students with disabilities, shall the Brisbane School District measure authorizing $27,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, be adopted, levying approximately 2.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($1,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3237, "fingerprint": "2020|202000632|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000632|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d6200f648b755c46", "measure_id": "202000632", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade local high schools that prepare students for college and today's competitive global job market; improve school safety; provide modern classroom technology; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment; update classrooms/labs for science, math/engineering instruction; shall San Mateo Union High School District's measure authorizing $385,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $15.55 / 10 $100,000 assessed value ($27,200,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring oversight/audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41467, "no_votes": 30708, "total_votes": 72175, "percent_yes": 57.45341184620714, "percent_no": 42.54658815379286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Mateo Union High School District to issue $38...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Mateo Union High School District to issue $385 million in bonds to upgrade high school facilities, improve safety, modernize classroom technology, and update science and math labs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $15.55 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $27.2 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.909870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.432290", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade local high schools that prepare students for college and today's competitive global job market; improve school safety; provide modern classroom technology; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment; update classrooms/labs for science, math/engineering instruction; shall San Mateo Union High School District's measure authorizing $385,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $15.55 / 10 $100,000 assessed value ($27,200,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring oversight/audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3234, "fingerprint": "2020|202000629|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000629|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2bc1aa3bd75c29a5", "measure_id": "202000629", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District continue a successful local parcel tax to improve access to technology in classrooms, provide enrichment opportunities for students, quality professional development for teachers and increase student achievement, in the amount of $130 per year per taxable parcel for seven years, with exemptions for contiguous parcels and parcels owned by persons 65 years and older, with funds stay in local schools, and with independent community review of all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 967, "no_votes": 369, "total_votes": 1336, "percent_yes": 72.38023952095809, "percent_no": 27.619760479041915, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would continue a $130 annual parcel tax for seven years in the L...", "summary_text": "This measure would continue a $130 annual parcel tax for seven years in the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District to fund classroom technology, student enrichment programs, and teacher professional development. The tax includes exemptions for seniors 65 and older and contiguous parcels, with spending subject to independent community oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.908965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.431746", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District continue a successful local parcel tax to improve access to technology in classrooms, provide enrichment opportunities for students, quality professional development for teachers and increase student achievement, in the amount of $130 per year per taxable parcel for seven years, with exemptions for contiguous parcels and parcels owned by persons 65 years and older, with funds stay in local schools, and with independent community review of all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3236, "fingerprint": "2020|202000631|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000631|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0e27787c0725acb6", "measure_id": "202000631", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the San Carlos School District maintain small class sizes and high- quality educational programs, including maintaining hands-on science, math, technology, and engineering programs; preserving reading and writing programs, attracting and retaining qualified and experienced teachers; and providing art, music, libraries; by adopting a measure adding $88 per parcel to the current $246.60 rate, raising $3,000,000 annually, for 8 years, with senior exemptions, independent citizens oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and funds staying local to benefit San Carlos students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9072, "no_votes": 3490, "total_votes": 12562, "percent_yes": 72.21779971342143, "percent_no": 27.782200286578572, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Carlos School District to add $88 per parcel ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Carlos School District to add $88 per parcel to the existing property tax rate, increasing it from $246.60 to $334.60 annually for 8 years to raise $3,000,000 per year. The funds are designated for educational programs including science, math, technology, arts, libraries, and teacher retention, with exemptions for seniors and restrictions preventing use for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.909500", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.432111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Carlos School District maintain small class sizes and high- quality educational programs, including maintaining hands-on science, math, technology, and engineering programs; preserving reading and writing programs, attracting and retaining qualified and experienced teachers; and providing art, music, libraries; by adopting a measure adding $88 per parcel to the current $246.60 rate, raising $3,000,000 annually, for 8 years, with senior exemptions, independent citizens oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and funds staying local to benefit San Carlos students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3232, "fingerprint": "2020|202000627|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000627|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "76f473c58ada2890", "measure_id": "202000627", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the quality of Burlingame schools; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms/school facilities to support 21st-century learning; fix damaged/leaky roofs; improve student safety; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; shall Burlingame Elementary School District's measure authorizing $97,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, at 2 cents per $100 of assessed value (approximately $5,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual' audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries and no money taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6485, "no_votes": 4292, "total_votes": 10777, "percent_yes": 60.17444557854691, "percent_no": 39.82555442145309, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Burlingame Elementary School District to issue $9...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Burlingame Elementary School District to issue $97 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, fix roofs, upgrade electrical systems, and improve school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 2 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.908357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.431384", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of Burlingame schools; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms/school facilities to support 21st-century learning; fix damaged/leaky roofs; improve student safety; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; shall Burlingame Elementary School District's measure authorizing $97,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, at 2 cents per $100 of assessed value (approximately $5,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual' audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries and no money taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3235, "fingerprint": "2020|202000630|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000630|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "21583607e561a50e", "measure_id": "202000630", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent local schools, shall Portola Valley School District protect enhanced science, math, reading/writing instruction, retain qualified/experienced teachers, support music and arts programs, limit class size increases, and maintain foreign language classes by renewing the current $581 per parcel tax, with 3% annual increases, raising at least $1,200,000 annually, for 8 years, with senior exemptions, annual audits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, no funds for Sacramento, and all funds supporting Portola Valley School District students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2279, "no_votes": 1257, "total_votes": 3536, "percent_yes": 64.45135746606336, "percent_no": 35.54864253393664, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have renewed a $581 annual parcel tax for the Porto...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have renewed a $581 annual parcel tax for the Portola Valley School District with 3% yearly increases for 8 years, generating at least $1.2 million annually to fund educational programs and services. The measure included exemptions for seniors and prohibited use of funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.909233", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.431930", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent local schools, shall Portola Valley School District protect enhanced science, math, reading/writing instruction, retain qualified/experienced teachers, support music and arts programs, limit class size increases, and maintain foreign language classes by renewing the current $581 per parcel tax, with 3% annual increases, raising at least $1,200,000 annually, for 8 years, with senior exemptions, annual audits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, no funds for Sacramento, and all funds supporting Portola Valley School District students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11150, "fingerprint": "2020|202000367|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000367|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fdc4bda7e72f3e66", "measure_id": "202000367", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide emergency funding\u2014that cannot be taken by the State\u2014maintaining the City's long-term financial stability/ City services, such as supporting local businesses; preventing/ addressing homelessness; maintaining paramedic, fire and 911 emergency response, senior services; preparing for natural disaster and public health emergencies, shall the measure establishing a 1/2 cent sales tax, providing approximately $6,000,000 until ended by voters and requiring independent audits and public oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28201, "no_votes": 10937, "total_votes": 39138, "percent_yes": 72.05529153252593, "percent_no": 27.944708467474072, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.5% sales tax in San Mateo to generate approximately $6 million annually for city services including emergency response, homelessness programs, senior services, and disaster preparedness. The tax requires independent audits and public oversight, and can only be ended by voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.453812", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.906617", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.430272", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide emergency funding\u2014that cannot be taken by the State\u2014maintaining the City's long-term financial stability/ City services, such as supporting local businesses; preventing/ addressing homelessness; maintaining paramedic, fire and 911 emergency response, senior services; preparing for natural disaster and public health emergencies, shall the measure establishing a 1/2 cent sales tax, providing approximately $6,000,000 until ended by voters and requiring independent audits and public oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3221, "fingerprint": "2020|202000068|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000068|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "27948b027c895fdf", "measure_id": "202000068", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure set forth in Resolution No. 077299 of the County of San Mateo continuing the levy of a special tax for four years at a maximum rate of $65 per parcel per year for extended police and structural fire protection services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1053, "no_votes": 261, "total_votes": 1314, "percent_yes": 80.13698630136986, "percent_no": 19.86301369863014, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues a special tax of up to $65 per parcel annually for fou...", "summary_text": "This measure continues a special tax of up to $65 per parcel annually for four years to fund extended police and fire protection services in San Mateo County.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-06-23", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.904770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.429170", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure set forth in Resolution No. 077299 of the County of San Mateo continuing the levy of a special tax for four years at a maximum rate of $65 per parcel per year for extended police and structural fire protection services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3223, "fingerprint": "2020|202000372|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000372|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "66f9944e31f3895d", "measure_id": "202000372", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance to amend the City of San Mateo General Plan to extend for ten years the expiration date for voter-enacted policies limiting building heights and intensities, but to authorize the City Council to approve increases in heights and intensities in designated areas that are close to major transit and to make other specified amendments to affordable housing policies in the plan, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21085, "no_votes": 24631, "total_votes": 45716, "percent_yes": 46.1217079359524, "percent_no": 53.8782920640476, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have extended for ten years the city's voter-enacted buildi...", "summary_text": "The measure would have extended for ten years the city's voter-enacted building height and density limits while allowing the City Council to approve increased heights and densities near major transit areas and making changes to affordable housing policies in the General Plan. The measure failed with 46.1% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.905449", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.429540", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance to amend the City of San Mateo General Plan to extend for ten years the expiration date for voter-enacted policies limiting building heights and intensities, but to authorize the City Council to approve increases in heights and intensities in designated areas that are close to major transit and to make other specified amendments to affordable housing policies in the plan, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3222, "fingerprint": "2020|202000069|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000069|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "3eccb7db899862ea", "measure_id": "202000069", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To preserve Caltrain service and support regional economic recovery, prevent traffic congestion, make Caltrain more affordable and accessible, reduce air pollution with cleaner and quieter electric trains, make travel times faster, and increase Caltrain frequency and capacity between Santa Clara, San Mateo and San Francisco counties, shall the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board's resolution levying a 30-year one-eighth cent sales tax with oversight and audits, providing approximately $100 million annually for Caltrain that the State cannot take away, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 248981, "no_votes": 102601, "total_votes": 351582, "percent_yes": 70.81733422075078, "percent_no": 29.18266577924922, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized a one-eighth cent sales tax for 30 years to fund Calt...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized a one-eighth cent sales tax for 30 years to fund Caltrain operations and improvements, generating approximately $100 million annually. The tax supports electric train infrastructure, increased service frequency and capacity, and general operational costs for the commuter rail system serving Santa Clara, San Mateo, and San Francisco counties.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.905116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.429353", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve Caltrain service and support regional economic recovery, prevent traffic congestion, make Caltrain more affordable and accessible, reduce air pollution with cleaner and quieter electric trains, make travel times faster, and increase Caltrain frequency and capacity between Santa Clara, San Mateo and San Francisco counties, shall the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board's resolution levying a 30-year one-eighth cent sales tax with oversight and audits, providing approximately $100 million annually for Caltrain that the State cannot take away, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3230, "fingerprint": "2020|202000370|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000370|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "49f2ad7918fb01f7", "measure_id": "202000370", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Although no cannabis (marijuana) businesses are currently allowed in the City, shall an ordinance be adopted imposing an additional business license tax of up to 10% of gross receipts on cannabis businesses, until ended by voters, with annual audits and all funds for San Bruno (this tax will generate no revenue initially, but would generate revenue if, in the future, cannabis businesses are permitted or exist in the City)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12601, "no_votes": 7501, "total_votes": 20102, "percent_yes": 62.68530494478162, "percent_no": 37.31469505521838, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopted a business license tax of up to 10% of gross receipts on...", "summary_text": "This measure adopted a business license tax of up to 10% of gross receipts on cannabis businesses in San Bruno, though no cannabis businesses were currently permitted in the city at the time. The tax would only generate revenue if cannabis businesses are allowed to operate in the city in the future.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.907806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.431018", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Although no cannabis (marijuana) businesses are currently allowed in the City, shall an ordinance be adopted imposing an additional business license tax of up to 10% of gross receipts on cannabis businesses, until ended by voters, with annual audits and all funds for San Bruno (this tax will generate no revenue initially, but would generate revenue if, in the future, cannabis businesses are permitted or exist in the City)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3239, "fingerprint": "2020|202000634|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000634|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0f9c1c250709242a", "measure_id": "202000634", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms for science, technology, engineering, math, art and music instruction; repair deteriorating bathrooms, roofs, plumbing, sewer, electrical, heating and cooling systems; provide computers/technology for distance learning, healthy and safe learning environments, including handwashing stations; acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment; shall San Mateo-Foster City School District's measure authorizing $409,000,000 in locally controlled bonds at legal rates, levying on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($26,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with independent citizen oversight/audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40067, "no_votes": 22480, "total_votes": 62547, "percent_yes": 64.05902761123635, "percent_no": 35.940972388763655, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Mateo-Foster City School District to issue $4...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Mateo-Foster City School District to issue $409 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, repair deteriorating infrastructure systems, and provide technology and safety improvements including handwashing stations. The bonds would be funded through a property tax levy averaging 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.910410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.432658", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms for science, technology, engineering, math, art and music instruction; repair deteriorating bathrooms, roofs, plumbing, sewer, electrical, heating and cooling systems; provide computers/technology for distance learning, healthy and safe learning environments, including handwashing stations; acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment; shall San Mateo-Foster City School District's measure authorizing $409,000,000 in locally controlled bonds at legal rates, levying on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($26,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with independent citizen oversight/audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3229, "fingerprint": "2020|202000369|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000369|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "26b1da0936d84968", "measure_id": "202000369", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support financial recovery/stability and maintain services, including: 9-1-1 emergency response; disaster preparedness; supporting local businesses/residents; and keeping public areas healthy/safe, shall the measure increasing, until ended by voters, the transient occupancy tax from 12% to 14% on July 1, 2021, and to 15% on July 1, 2022 (paid only by hotel/lodging guests), providing approximately $1,500,000 annually in locally controlled funding for general revenue purposes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4975, "no_votes": 1849, "total_votes": 6824, "percent_yes": 72.9044548651817, "percent_no": 27.095545134818295, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased San Mateo's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 1...", "summary_text": "This measure increased San Mateo's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 12% to 14% in 2021 and to 15% in 2022, generating approximately $1.5 million annually for general city revenue. The tax increases remain in effect until ended by voters in a future election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.907437", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.430831", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support financial recovery/stability and maintain services, including: 9-1-1 emergency response; disaster preparedness; supporting local businesses/residents; and keeping public areas healthy/safe, shall the measure increasing, until ended by voters, the transient occupancy tax from 12% to 14% on July 1, 2021, and to 15% on July 1, 2022 (paid only by hotel/lodging guests), providing approximately $1,500,000 annually in locally controlled funding for general revenue purposes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3226, "fingerprint": "2020|202000368|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000368|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c4a749c1dfead240", "measure_id": "202000368", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure to impose an increase to the City's current Transient Occupancy Tax rate of 12%, paid by a person who rents a hotel room, by a 1% increase on January 1, 2022, and another 1% on January 1, 2023, for a total rate of 14%, estimated to raise $195,000 the first year, and $390,000 annually thereafter, for affordable housing development, acquisition and rehabilitation activities, which shall continue unless repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5157, "no_votes": 2818, "total_votes": 7975, "percent_yes": 64.66457680250784, "percent_no": 35.33542319749216, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased San Mateo's transient occupancy tax (hotel ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased San Mateo's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 12% to 14% through two 1% increases in 2022 and 2023, with revenue dedicated to affordable housing development, acquisition, and rehabilitation. The tax increase was estimated to generate $195,000 in the first year and $390,000 annually thereafter.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.906255", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.430089", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure to impose an increase to the City's current Transient Occupancy Tax rate of 12%, paid by a person who rents a hotel room, by a 1% increase on January 1, 2022, and another 1% on January 1, 2023, for a total rate of 14%, estimated to raise $195,000 the first year, and $390,000 annually thereafter, for affordable housing development, acquisition and rehabilitation activities, which shall continue unless repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3228, "fingerprint": "2020|202000373|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000373|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8b664df9ee3eb906", "measure_id": "202000373", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general city services such as: maintaining streets and repairing potholes; providing fire, paramedic, and 9-1-1 emergency response; managing traffic congestion and enhancing pedestrian safety measures; maintaining parks, recreation and community facilities, infrastructure, and general city services; shall an ordinance increasing the City of San Mateo's existing transient occupancy tax paid by hotel/motel guests to 14% to provide an estimated $1,000,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35224, "no_votes": 11808, "total_votes": 47032, "percent_yes": 74.89368940295968, "percent_no": 25.10631059704032, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased San Mateo's transient occupancy tax on hotel and motel...", "summary_text": "This measure increased San Mateo's transient occupancy tax on hotel and motel guests to 14%, generating an estimated $1,000,000 annually for general city services including street maintenance, emergency services, traffic management, and parks and recreation facilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.907169", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.430647", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general city services such as: maintaining streets and repairing potholes; providing fire, paramedic, and 9-1-1 emergency response; managing traffic congestion and enhancing pedestrian safety measures; maintaining parks, recreation and community facilities, infrastructure, and general city services; shall an ordinance increasing the City of San Mateo's existing transient occupancy tax paid by hotel/motel guests to 14% to provide an estimated $1,000,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3227, "fingerprint": "2020|202000371|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000371|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4eec5c31f573a59f", "measure_id": "202000371", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund maintain/city services/facilities such as: addressing traffic congestion/parking, maintaining neighborhood safety, 911 emergency medical response times, disaster/health crisis response services, parks/city facilities, and general services, shall an ordinance updating the City of San Bruno's existing transient occupancy tax (a bed tax paid only by hotel/lodging guests) from 12% to 14%, until ended by voters, providing approximately an additional $370,000 annually for San Bruno, with independent audits, all funds controlled locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14245, "no_votes": 5646, "total_votes": 19891, "percent_yes": 71.61530340354935, "percent_no": 28.384696596450652, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased San Bruno's transient occupancy tax (hotel bed tax) fr...", "summary_text": "This measure increased San Bruno's transient occupancy tax (hotel bed tax) from 12% to 14% to generate approximately $370,000 annually for city services including traffic management, public safety, emergency response, parks, and general municipal operations. The tax increase remains in effect until ended by voters and includes provisions for independent audits with local control of funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.906896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.430463", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund maintain/city services/facilities such as: addressing traffic congestion/parking, maintaining neighborhood safety, 911 emergency medical response times, disaster/health crisis response services, parks/city facilities, and general services, shall an ordinance updating the City of San Bruno's existing transient occupancy tax (a bed tax paid only by hotel/lodging guests) from 12% to 14%, until ended by voters, providing approximately an additional $370,000 annually for San Bruno, with independent audits, all funds controlled locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3224, "fingerprint": "2020|202000374|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000374|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b1c61b2fd3df8ae2", "measure_id": "202000374", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance to amend the City of San Mateo General Plan to maintain for ten years voter-enacted policies limiting building heights, residential densities, and nonresidential building intensities, and to modify and maintain for 10 years an inclusionary housing requirement for residential projects, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23038, "no_votes": 22995, "total_votes": 46033, "percent_yes": 50.04670562422609, "percent_no": 49.95329437577391, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends San Mateo's General Plan to maintain voter-enacted limits ...", "summary_text": "The measure amends San Mateo's General Plan to maintain voter-enacted limits on building heights, residential densities, and nonresidential building intensities for ten years, while also modifying and extending inclusionary housing requirements for residential projects for the same period.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.905719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.429721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance to amend the City of San Mateo General Plan to maintain for ten years voter-enacted policies limiting building heights, residential densities, and nonresidential building intensities, and to modify and maintain for 10 years an inclusionary housing requirement for residential projects, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3238, "fingerprint": "2020|202000633|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000633|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5aab640a2a519ee3", "measure_id": "202000633", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety /campus security including emergency communication/ notification systems and renovate/ construct classrooms and facilities at Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor and Adult-Ed High Schools shall Jefferson Union High School District's measure authorizing $163 million in bonds be approved with legal interest rates, raising an average $10.2 million per year until repaid, estimated average annual tax levies less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens' oversight and no increase in current estimated tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38662, "no_votes": 21314, "total_votes": 59976, "percent_yes": 64.4624516473256, "percent_no": 35.537548352674406, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Jefferson Union High School District to issue $16...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Jefferson Union High School District to issue $163 million in bonds to improve student safety and campus security systems, and to renovate and construct classrooms and facilities at six high schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies estimated at less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens' oversight and annual audits required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.910135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.432477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety /campus security including emergency communication/ notification systems and renovate/ construct classrooms and facilities at Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor and Adult-Ed High Schools shall Jefferson Union High School District's measure authorizing $163 million in bonds be approved with legal interest rates, raising an average $10.2 million per year until repaid, estimated average annual tax levies less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens' oversight and no increase in current estimated tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3242, "fingerprint": "2020|202000375|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000375|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "cff4ad2cfbe0977e", "measure_id": "202000375", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve public services, including neighborhood police patrols, firefighter staffing, gang enforcement, crime and vandalism prevention, street improvements, community and recreational services, park upgrades, reduction of long-term liabilities (which includes a potential savings of $21 million in interest payments), and other general city services, shall the measure establishing an additional maximum 1% sales tax, ending in 15 years, and estimated to generate $4,800,000 annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5927, "no_votes": 2617, "total_votes": 8544, "percent_yes": 69.37031835205993, "percent_no": 30.629681647940075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established an additional 1% sales tax in Santa Barbara for 15 y...", "summary_text": "This measure established an additional 1% sales tax in Santa Barbara for 15 years to fund various city services including police patrols, firefighter staffing, street improvements, parks, and reduction of long-term debt. The tax was estimated to generate approximately $4.8 million annually for general city services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.911296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.433208", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve public services, including neighborhood police patrols, firefighter staffing, gang enforcement, crime and vandalism prevention, street improvements, community and recreational services, park upgrades, reduction of long-term liabilities (which includes a potential savings of $21 million in interest payments), and other general city services, shall the measure establishing an additional maximum 1% sales tax, ending in 15 years, and estimated to generate $4,800,000 annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3244, "fingerprint": "2020|202000635|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000635|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "16b71dde47b3eb96", "measure_id": "202000635", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize outdated classrooms/restrooms/school facilities to improve the quality of education; repair/replace outdated heating/ventilation/air-conditioning systems; improve safety/security; repair, construction, acquire classrooms, sites/equipment, shall the Hope Elementary School District measure be adopted to issue $47,400,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy approximately 3 cents/$100 assessed value, generating $2,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4089, "no_votes": 2537, "total_votes": 6626, "percent_yes": 61.71143978267432, "percent_no": 38.28856021732568, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Hope Elementary School District to issue $47", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Hope Elementary School District to issue $47.4 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, repair heating and ventilation systems, and improve safety and security. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $2.8 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.911833", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.433571", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize outdated classrooms/restrooms/school facilities to improve the quality of education; repair/replace outdated heating/ventilation/air-conditioning systems; improve safety/security; repair, construction, acquire classrooms, sites/equipment, shall the Hope Elementary School District measure be adopted to issue $47,400,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy approximately 3 cents/$100 assessed value, generating $2,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and no money taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3245, "fingerprint": "2020|202000636|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000636|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "46a55495df47d8b6", "measure_id": "202000636", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace aging, deteriorating portable buildings with new Science, Engineering, Technology, Art classrooms; repair classroom buildings, roofs, sewer/water lines, restrooms, plumbing; provide safe drinking water; improve fire alarms/sprinklers, emergency communications; retain/attract quality teachers, shall the Cold Spring Elementary School District issue $7.8 million in bonds at legal rates averaging $527,525 annually while bonds are outstanding, at 1.3 \u00a2 per $100 assessed value, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, all funds spent for Cold Spring School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 841, "no_votes": 785, "total_votes": 1626, "percent_yes": 51.7220172201722, "percent_no": 48.2779827798278, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Cold Spring Elementary School District...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Cold Spring Elementary School District to issue $7.8 million in bonds to replace portable buildings with new classrooms, repair infrastructure including roofs and plumbing systems, and improve safety systems like fire alarms and emergency communications. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax assessment of 1.3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.912106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.433765", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace aging, deteriorating portable buildings with new Science, Engineering, Technology, Art classrooms; repair classroom buildings, roofs, sewer/water lines, restrooms, plumbing; provide safe drinking water; improve fire alarms/sprinklers, emergency communications; retain/attract quality teachers, shall the Cold Spring Elementary School District issue $7.8 million in bonds at legal rates averaging $527,525 annually while bonds are outstanding, at 1.3 \u00a2 per $100 assessed value, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, all funds spent for Cold Spring School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3246, "fingerprint": "2020|202000637|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000637|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "1299c8d21f7346b9", "measure_id": "202000637", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Math) labs; increase student internet access and classroom technology; improve handicap accessibility; increase renewable energy including solar; and repair and renovate classrooms and school facilities, including leaking roofs and plumbing, shall Goleta Union School District's measure authorizing $80 million in bonds be adopted with average payments of $19.31/$100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $5,023,353 /year while bonds are outstanding), legal rates, annual audits, independent oversight and qualifying for state matching funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25667, "no_votes": 10320, "total_votes": 35987, "percent_yes": 71.32297774196238, "percent_no": 28.677022258037624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Goleta Union School District to issue $80 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Goleta Union School District to issue $80 million in bonds to upgrade STEAM labs, improve technology and internet access, enhance accessibility, install renewable energy systems, and repair school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of $19.31 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.912429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.433953", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Math) labs; increase student internet access and classroom technology; improve handicap accessibility; increase renewable energy including solar; and repair and renovate classrooms and school facilities, including leaking roofs and plumbing, shall Goleta Union School District's measure authorizing $80 million in bonds be adopted with average payments of $19.31/$100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $5,023,353 /year while bonds are outstanding), legal rates, annual audits, independent oversight and qualifying for state matching funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3243, "fingerprint": "2020|202000377|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000377|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "32907c7cd0a78146", "measure_id": "202000377", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain/enhance essential services, including public safety, crime/graffiti/vandalism prevention, and opportunities for youth, including parks, recreation, library, and other vital services, reduce debt, and provide durable fiscal stability; shall the measure be approved adopting an ordinance reauthorizing transaction and use tax funding at the one cent rate until ended by voters, providing $625,000 annually, with no funds able to be taken by Sacramento and all funds used locally.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1518, "no_votes": 689, "total_votes": 2207, "percent_yes": 68.78115088355233, "percent_no": 31.21884911644767, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reauthorized a one-cent sales tax in Santa Barbara to fund local...", "summary_text": "This measure reauthorized a one-cent sales tax in Santa Barbara to fund local services including public safety, parks, recreation, libraries, and youth programs, generating approximately $625,000 annually. The tax will continue until voters choose to end it, with all funds required to be used locally rather than by the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.911562", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.433390", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/enhance essential services, including public safety, crime/graffiti/vandalism prevention, and opportunities for youth, including parks, recreation, library, and other vital services, reduce debt, and provide durable fiscal stability; shall the measure be approved adopting an ordinance reauthorizing transaction and use tax funding at the one cent rate until ended by voters, providing $625,000 annually, with no funds able to be taken by Sacramento and all funds used locally.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3240, "fingerprint": "2020|202000376|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000376|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "420333d246d614f4", "measure_id": "202000376", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of the mayor be changed from two years to four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8545, "no_votes": 8066, "total_votes": 16611, "percent_yes": 51.44181566431882, "percent_no": 48.55818433568118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the term of office for Santa Barbara's mayor from two ye...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the term of office for Santa Barbara's mayor from two years to four years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.910675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.432842", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of the mayor be changed from two years to four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3241, "fingerprint": "2020|202000378|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000378|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "7ca712b586ffc15b", "measure_id": "202000378", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Niels Chris Djernaes be recalled (removed) from the office of City of Solvang Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2878, "no_votes": 434, "total_votes": 3312, "percent_yes": 86.89613526570048, "percent_no": 13.10386473429952, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure sought to recall (remove) Niels Chris Djernaes from his position...", "summary_text": "This measure sought to recall (remove) Niels Chris Djernaes from his position as a City of Solvang Council Member. The recall was approved by voters, resulting in Djernaes being removed from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.911030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.433025", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Niels Chris Djernaes be recalled (removed) from the office of City of Solvang Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11151, "fingerprint": "2020|202000384|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000384|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8ef05b36f6e06657", "measure_id": "202000384", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure proposing an ordinance replacing the Town's current Finance Committee and Sales Tax Oversight Committee with a Finance Commission that would advise the Town Council on financial, budgetary and investment matters, including but not limited to, the Annual Budget, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, capital expenditures, sales tax revenue and expenditures, and other recommendations as the Town Council directs, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9452, "no_votes": 7238, "total_votes": 16690, "percent_yes": 56.63271420011983, "percent_no": 43.36728579988017, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure replaces Santa Clara's existing Finance Committee and Sales Tax O...", "summary_text": "The measure replaces Santa Clara's existing Finance Committee and Sales Tax Oversight Committee with a single Finance Commission that would advise the Town Council on budgetary, financial, and investment matters including the annual budget, financial reports, capital expenditures, and sales tax revenue and spending.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.458578", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.913809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.434915", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure proposing an ordinance replacing the Town's current Finance Committee and Sales Tax Oversight Committee with a Finance Commission that would advise the Town Council on financial, budgetary and investment matters, including but not limited to, the Annual Budget, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, capital expenditures, sales tax revenue and expenditures, and other recommendations as the Town Council directs, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3248, "fingerprint": "2020|202000379|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000379|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d3180db244530f76", "measure_id": "202000379", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance No. 2295, amending a Planned Development Master Plan for \"Madrone Village Shopping Center\" located on the northwest corner of Madrone Parkway and Cochrane Road (APN's 726-33-029,030, and 031), to add hotels as an approved use, which is consistent with the City's General Plan and Economic Blueprint to encourage tourism, and that generates new City revenues for City services including public safety, street repairs and other infrastructure be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4726, "no_votes": 9586, "total_votes": 14312, "percent_yes": 33.02124091671324, "percent_no": 66.97875908328676, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended the planned development master plan for Madron...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended the planned development master plan for Madrone Village Shopping Center to allow hotels as an approved use on the property located at the northwest corner of Madrone Parkway and Cochrane Road.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.912976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.434330", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance No. 2295, amending a Planned Development Master Plan for \"Madrone Village Shopping Center\" located on the northwest corner of Madrone Parkway and Cochrane Road (APN's 726-33-029,030, and 031), to add hotels as an approved use, which is consistent with the City's General Plan and Economic Blueprint to encourage tourism, and that generates new City revenues for City services including public safety, street repairs and other infrastructure be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11152, "fingerprint": "2020|202000385|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000385|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b7431583ff1d5b41", "measure_id": "202000385", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure proposing a term limit ordinance to require that after serving two (2) four (4) year terms, a Town Council Member is not eligible to run for the Town Council or to be appointed to a vacancy unless a period of four years has elapsed since their last service on Town Council, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14561, "no_votes": 3107, "total_votes": 17668, "percent_yes": 82.41453475209418, "percent_no": 17.585465247905816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes term limits for Santa Clara Town Council members, re...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes term limits for Santa Clara Town Council members, requiring them to take a four-year break from service after serving two consecutive four-year terms before being eligible to run again or be appointed to fill a vacancy.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.458868", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.914086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.435096", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure proposing a term limit ordinance to require that after serving two (2) four (4) year terms, a Town Council Member is not eligible to run for the Town Council or to be appointed to a vacancy unless a period of four years has elapsed since their last service on Town Council, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3250, "fingerprint": "2020|202000383|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000383|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b031eecd2c186f4f", "measure_id": "202000383", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article VI of the City of Sunnyvale Charter be amended to establish \u201cby-district\u201d elections for six Council members required to be residents of a district and elected only by the voters of that district, and one Mayor who will be directly elected by all City voters; change term limits to permit service on the Council for three consecutive terms but only two as Council member or Mayor; and make other conforming amendments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19976, "no_votes": 12338, "total_votes": 32314, "percent_yes": 61.8184068824658, "percent_no": 38.1815931175342, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Sunnyvale's city charter to change from at-large electio...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Sunnyvale's city charter to change from at-large elections to a system where six council members are elected by voters within their specific districts, while the mayor is elected citywide. It also modified term limits to allow three consecutive terms on council but only two terms in the same position as either council member or mayor.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.913525", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.434724", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article VI of the City of Sunnyvale Charter be amended to establish \u201cby-district\u201d elections for six Council members required to be residents of a district and elected only by the voters of that district, and one Mayor who will be directly elected by all City voters; change term limits to permit service on the Council for three consecutive terms but only two as Council member or Mayor; and make other conforming amendments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11153, "fingerprint": "2020|202000387|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000387|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b1ecb4fd9730336b", "measure_id": "202000387", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Mountain View Ordinance No.15.19, which prohibits parking of oversized vehicles (such as recreational vehicles, boats and large trucks) except wheelchair-accessible vans with valid disabled placard and those exempted for short duration activities (such as loading and unloading, and emergency vehicles) on narrow streets 40 feet or less in width, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18455, "no_votes": 14159, "total_votes": 32614, "percent_yes": 56.58612865640522, "percent_no": 43.41387134359478, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance prohibits parking of oversized vehicles such as recreational ve...", "summary_text": "The ordinance prohibits parking of oversized vehicles such as recreational vehicles, boats, and large trucks on streets that are 40 feet or less in width, with exceptions for wheelchair-accessible vans with disabled placards and vehicles engaged in short-term activities like loading or emergency services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.459265", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.914633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.435546", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Mountain View Ordinance No.15.19, which prohibits parking of oversized vehicles (such as recreational vehicles, boats and large trucks) except wheelchair-accessible vans with valid disabled placard and those exempted for short duration activities (such as loading and unloading, and emergency vehicles) on narrow streets 40 feet or less in width, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3249, "fingerprint": "2020|202000382|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000382|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "abce082e08bdc74e", "measure_id": "202000382", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to elect city council members by district, excepting the mayor, as follows: for the 2020 election to establish six districts for the election of one council member to represent each district; and, beginning in 2022 to establish three districts for the election of two council members to represent each district; and to require an independent redistricting committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9731, "no_votes": 15458, "total_votes": 25189, "percent_yes": 38.6319425145897, "percent_no": 61.3680574854103, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed Santa Clara's city council election system fr...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed Santa Clara's city council election system from at-large to district-based representation, initially creating six single-member districts in 2020 and then transitioning to three two-member districts starting in 2022, while establishing an independent redistricting committee. The mayor would continue to be elected city-wide.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.913253", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.434540", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to elect city council members by district, excepting the mayor, as follows: for the 2020 election to establish six districts for the election of one council member to represent each district; and, beginning in 2022 to establish three districts for the election of two council members to represent each district; and to require an independent redistricting committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3252, "fingerprint": "2020|202000380|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000380|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0e31a10d3c6a0976", "measure_id": "202000380", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: prohibit paying Rental Housing Committee (RHC) members; clarify the RHC independently implements the Community Stabilization and Fair Rent Act and related initiatives delegated by the City Council; clarify the City Council may remove RHC members for reasons including misconduct; allow annual rent increases up to 4%; authorize additional rent increases for critical housing improvements like seismic retrofits; clarify mobile homes are exempt; and make technical revisions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6709, "no_votes": 15399, "total_votes": 22108, "percent_yes": 30.34648091188709, "percent_no": 69.65351908811292, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment would have prohibited paying Rental Housing Committee ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment would have prohibited paying Rental Housing Committee members, allowed annual rent increases up to 4% with additional increases for critical housing improvements, and clarified the committee's independence in implementing rent control while giving the City Council authority to remove members for misconduct. The measure also would have exempted mobile homes from rent control provisions and made various technical revisions to the city charter.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.914940", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.435747", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: prohibit paying Rental Housing Committee (RHC) members; clarify the RHC independently implements the Community Stabilization and Fair Rent Act and related initiatives delegated by the City Council; clarify the City Council may remove RHC members for reasons including misconduct; allow annual rent increases up to 4%; authorize additional rent increases for critical housing improvements like seismic retrofits; clarify mobile homes are exempt; and make technical revisions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11154, "fingerprint": "2020|202000390|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000390|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a88b827d6a4259be", "measure_id": "202000390", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and protect the level of essential city services including 9-1-1 emergency medical/disaster preparedness, police and fire protection, bicycle and pedestrian safety, roadways and storm drains, and other vital services including parks, recreation, libraries and senior services, shall a measure increasing the hotel tax rate up to 4%, generating up to approximately 7 million dollars annually, paid only by hotel/motel guests, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33183, "no_votes": 11923, "total_votes": 45106, "percent_yes": 73.56670952866581, "percent_no": 26.43329047133419, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Santa Clara's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) by u...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Santa Clara's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) by up to 4 percentage points, generating approximately $7 million annually from hotel and motel guests to fund city services including emergency services, infrastructure, and recreational facilities. The tax remains in effect until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.460252", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.916141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.436514", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and protect the level of essential city services including 9-1-1 emergency medical/disaster preparedness, police and fire protection, bicycle and pedestrian safety, roadways and storm drains, and other vital services including parks, recreation, libraries and senior services, shall a measure increasing the hotel tax rate up to 4%, generating up to approximately 7 million dollars annually, paid only by hotel/motel guests, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3253, "fingerprint": "2020|202000381|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000381|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f8791c8ed5d8655b", "measure_id": "202000381", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general City of San Jos\u00e9 services, including affordable housing for seniors, veterans, disabled, and low-income families, and helping homeless residents move into shelters/permanent housing, shall an ordinance be adopted enacting a real property transfer tax including unrecorded transfers at these rates: EXEMPT transfers under $2,000,000 adjusted for inflation, $2,000,000 to $5,000,000 at 0.75%, $5,000,000.01 to $10,000,000 at 1.0%, and over $10,000,000 at 1.5%; generating approximately $70,000,000 annually, until repealed, with all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120969, "no_votes": 105290, "total_votes": 226259, "percent_yes": 53.46483454801798, "percent_no": 46.53516545198202, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a real property transfer tax in San Jos\u00e9 with tiered rat...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a real property transfer tax in San Jos\u00e9 with tiered rates starting at 0.75% for properties valued between $2-5 million and increasing to 1.5% for properties over $10 million, while exempting transfers under $2 million. The tax is expected to generate approximately $70 million annually to fund general city services including affordable housing and homeless services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.915270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.435929", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general City of San Jos\u00e9 services, including affordable housing for seniors, veterans, disabled, and low-income families, and helping homeless residents move into shelters/permanent housing, shall an ordinance be adopted enacting a real property transfer tax including unrecorded transfers at these rates: EXEMPT transfers under $2,000,000 adjusted for inflation, $2,000,000 to $5,000,000 at 0.75%, $5,000,000.01 to $10,000,000 at 1.0%, and over $10,000,000 at 1.5%; generating approximately $70,000,000 annually, until repealed, with all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3254, "fingerprint": "2020|202000386|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000386|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0ae39568d01ce954", "measure_id": "202000386", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding to maintain the City\u2019s finances and services, including: police and fire protection, 9-1-1 emergency response, and natural disaster preparation; youth, senior, and recreation services; repairing park equipment and maintaining parks and recreation centers; and attracting and retaining location businesses; shall the measure, establishing a1/4\u00a2 sales tax, providing approximately $6,500,000 annually for 8 years, requiring independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight committee, all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17041, "no_votes": 11192, "total_votes": 28233, "percent_yes": 60.35844579038714, "percent_no": 39.64155420961286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.25% sales tax in Santa Clara for 8 years to generate approximately $6.5 million annually for city services including police, fire, emergency response, parks, recreation, and economic development. The measure includes requirements for independent audits and citizen oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.915545", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.436124", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding to maintain the City\u2019s finances and services, including: police and fire protection, 9-1-1 emergency response, and natural disaster preparation; youth, senior, and recreation services; repairing park equipment and maintaining parks and recreation centers; and attracting and retaining location businesses; shall the measure, establishing a1/4\u00a2 sales tax, providing approximately $6,500,000 annually for 8 years, requiring independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight committee, all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11155, "fingerprint": "2020|202000644|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000644|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "2c49f82fbba1d0c6", "measure_id": "202000644", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade facilities preparing students/veterans for university transfer/careers like healthcare, nursing, technology, engineering/sciences; upgrade/repair aging classrooms, labs for science, technology, engineering/math-related fields of instruction; acquire, construct, repair facilities, equipment/sites; shall Foothill-De Anza Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $898,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.6 cents/$100 assessed valuation ($48,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with audits/no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71490, "no_votes": 49924, "total_votes": 121414, "percent_yes": 58.88118338906552, "percent_no": 41.11881661093448, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Foothill-De Anza Community College District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Foothill-De Anza Community College District to issue $898 million in bonds to upgrade, repair, and construct educational facilities and equipment, particularly for science, technology, engineering, math, healthcare, and nursing programs. The bonds are funded through a property tax levy of 1.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.461648", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.918115", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.437852", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade facilities preparing students/veterans for university transfer/careers like healthcare, nursing, technology, engineering/sciences; upgrade/repair aging classrooms, labs for science, technology, engineering/math-related fields of instruction; acquire, construct, repair facilities, equipment/sites; shall Foothill-De Anza Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $898,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.6 cents/$100 assessed valuation ($48,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with audits/no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3251, "fingerprint": "2020|202000388|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000388|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "03ec9d990a921aa5", "measure_id": "202000388", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: expand the Independent Police Auditor\u2019s oversight, including review of officer-involved shootings and use of force incidents causing death or great bodily injury, review of department-initiated investigations against officers, and other technical amendments; increase the Planning Commission to 11 members with Council appointing one member from each Council District and one \u201cat-large\u201d member; and allow the Council to establish timelines for redistricting when Census results are late?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 302315, "no_votes": 89056, "total_votes": 391371, "percent_yes": 77.24512035894331, "percent_no": 22.75487964105669, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment expanded the Independent Police Auditor's oversight au...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment expanded the Independent Police Auditor's oversight authority to include review of officer-involved shootings, use of force incidents causing death or great bodily injury, and department-initiated investigations against officers. It also increased the Planning Commission from its previous size to 11 members with specific appointment procedures and allowed the City Council to set redistricting timelines when Census results are delayed.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.914364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.435283", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: expand the Independent Police Auditor\u2019s oversight, including review of officer-involved shootings and use of force incidents causing death or great bodily injury, review of department-initiated investigations against officers, and other technical amendments; increase the Planning Commission to 11 members with Council appointing one member from each Council District and one \u201cat-large\u201d member; and allow the Council to establish timelines for redistricting when Census results are late?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11156, "fingerprint": "2020|202000645|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000645|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3ce112d0f9fd4ec4", "measure_id": "202000645", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funding for local colleges that cannot be taken by the State; keep college education affordable; attract and retain quality teachers; support homeless, hungry students; maintain science, technology, health-science programs; and prepare students for university transfer, career and job training, shall Foothill-De Anza Community College District\u2019s measure levying $48 per parcel for 5 years ($5,500,000 annually), be adopted, with citizens\u2019 oversight, and with no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 74751, "no_votes": 44647, "total_votes": 119398, "percent_yes": 62.60657632456154, "percent_no": 37.39342367543846, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a $48 annual parcel tax for 5 years on proper...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a $48 annual parcel tax for 5 years on properties within the Foothill-De Anza Community College District to generate $5.5 million annually for college programs and services. The funds would have been prohibited from being used for administrator salaries and would have been subject to citizens' oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.461851", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.918387", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.438047", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for local colleges that cannot be taken by the State; keep college education affordable; attract and retain quality teachers; support homeless, hungry students; maintain science, technology, health-science programs; and prepare students for university transfer, career and job training, shall Foothill-De Anza Community College District\u2019s measure levying $48 per parcel for 5 years ($5,500,000 annually), be adopted, with citizens\u2019 oversight, and with no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3255, "fingerprint": "2020|202000389|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000389|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1fd5a743ff7d9e47", "measure_id": "202000389", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general San Jos\u00e9 services, including fire protection, disaster preparedness, 911 emergency response, street repair, youth programs, addressing homelessness, and supporting vulnerable residents, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the cardroom tax rate from 15% to 16.5%, applying the tax to third party providers at these rates: up to $25,000,000 at 5%; $25,000,001 to $30,000,000 at 7.5%; and over $30,000,000 at 10%, increasing card tables by 30, generating approximately $15,000,000 annually, until repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 285756, "no_votes": 107682, "total_votes": 393438, "percent_yes": 72.63050340841505, "percent_no": 27.369496591584948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased San Jos\u00e9's cardroom tax rate from 15% to 16", "summary_text": "This measure increased San Jos\u00e9's cardroom tax rate from 15% to 16.5% and established a tiered tax system for third-party providers ranging from 5% to 10% based on revenue levels, while also allowing 30 additional card tables. The measure was expected to generate approximately $15 million annually for general city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.915816", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.436313", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general San Jos\u00e9 services, including fire protection, disaster preparedness, 911 emergency response, street repair, youth programs, addressing homelessness, and supporting vulnerable residents, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the cardroom tax rate from 15% to 16.5%, applying the tax to third party providers at these rates: up to $25,000,000 at 5%; $25,000,001 to $30,000,000 at 7.5%; and over $30,000,000 at 10%, increasing card tables by 30, generating approximately $15,000,000 annually, until repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11165, "fingerprint": "2020|202000662|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000662|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "385664adb76cf3e2", "measure_id": "202000662", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide locally controlled funding for community colleges to attract and retain quality faculty; provide assistance with food, housing, fees, books, transportation, and internet access so students can complete their degrees; prepare students for transfer to UC and CSU schools, and career and job training, shall San JoseEvergreen Community College District\u2019s measure levying $18 per parcel for 9 years ($4,500,000 annually), be adopted, with citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 210213, "no_votes": 129847, "total_votes": 340060, "percent_yes": 61.81644415691349, "percent_no": 38.18355584308651, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have levied an $18 annual parcel tax for 9 years to genera...", "summary_text": "This measure would have levied an $18 annual parcel tax for 9 years to generate $4.5 million annually for the San Jose-Evergreen Community College District to fund faculty retention, student support services, and educational programs. The measure failed despite receiving 61.8% support, likely because it required a two-thirds majority to pass.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.465217", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.923294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.442041", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide locally controlled funding for community colleges to attract and retain quality faculty; provide assistance with food, housing, fees, books, transportation, and internet access so students can complete their degrees; prepare students for transfer to UC and CSU schools, and career and job training, shall San JoseEvergreen Community College District\u2019s measure levying $18 per parcel for 9 years ($4,500,000 annually), be adopted, with citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3264, "fingerprint": "2020|202000648|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000648|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d034adf95623c96b", "measure_id": "202000648", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms which retain/attract quality teachers; enhance student access to computer/modern technology; provide quality education; improve school safety, heating/cooling systems, restrooms, energy efficiency/handicapped accessibility; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, equipment, sites/facilities; shall Morgan Hill Unified School District's measure authorizing $900,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying, on average, 4.7 cents/ $100 assessed value ($27,900,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with annual audits, all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8268, "no_votes": 12866, "total_votes": 21134, "percent_yes": 39.121794265165136, "percent_no": 60.878205734834864, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Morgan Hill Unified School District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Morgan Hill Unified School District to issue $900 million in bonds to fund classroom upgrades, technology improvements, safety enhancements, and facility repairs and construction. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes averaging 4.7 cents per $100 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.919196", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.438624", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms which retain/attract quality teachers; enhance student access to computer/modern technology; provide quality education; improve school safety, heating/cooling systems, restrooms, energy efficiency/handicapped accessibility; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, equipment, sites/facilities; shall Morgan Hill Unified School District's measure authorizing $900,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying, on average, 4.7 cents/ $100 assessed value ($27,900,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with annual audits, all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11166, "fingerprint": "2020|202000663|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000663|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "21d302acb3f73e3c", "measure_id": "202000663", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade facilities preparing students/veterans for university transfer/careers like healthcare, technology, emergency response, and recruit/retain quality faculty by modernizing, repairing aging classrooms, technology, science labs; acquire construct, repair facilities, equipment, sites; shall San Jos\u00e9Evergreen Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $858,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.75\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation, raising approximately $53,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with audits/no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 179139, "no_votes": 158283, "total_votes": 337422, "percent_yes": 53.09049202482351, "percent_no": 46.90950797517649, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the San Jos\u00e9-Evergreen Community College D...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the San Jos\u00e9-Evergreen Community College District to issue $858 million in bonds to modernize and repair classrooms, laboratories, and facilities, funded by a property tax of 1.75 cents per $100 of assessed valuation. The bonds would have raised approximately $53 million annually to upgrade educational facilities and equipment for student programs in areas like healthcare, technology, and emergency response.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.465416", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.923645", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.442515", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade facilities preparing students/veterans for university transfer/careers like healthcare, technology, emergency response, and recruit/retain quality faculty by modernizing, repairing aging classrooms, technology, science labs; acquire construct, repair facilities, equipment, sites; shall San Jos\u00e9Evergreen Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $858,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.75\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation, raising approximately $53,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with audits/no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3260, "fingerprint": "2020|202000642|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000642|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "79232da042b95652", "measure_id": "202000642", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To allow local high school teachers and staff members to live in the community in which they work and improve the school district\u2019s ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees by constructing teacher-staff rental housing, shall East Side Union High School District measure authorizing $60 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates raising approximately $4.1 million for annual repayment while bonds are outstanding, projected levies of less than $0.003 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56276, "no_votes": 51027, "total_votes": 107303, "percent_yes": 52.44587756167115, "percent_no": 47.55412243832885, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the East Side Union High School District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the East Side Union High School District to issue $60 million in bonds to construct rental housing for teachers and staff. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than $0.003 per $100 of assessed valuation while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.917508", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.437456", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To allow local high school teachers and staff members to live in the community in which they work and improve the school district\u2019s ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees by constructing teacher-staff rental housing, shall East Side Union High School District measure authorizing $60 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates raising approximately $4.1 million for annual repayment while bonds are outstanding, projected levies of less than $0.003 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11160, "fingerprint": "2020|202000657|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000657|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "32e02df6e1d6e8d4", "measure_id": "202000657", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and enhance student achievement, by expanding reading, counseling and tutoring programs for at-risk students; maintaining small class sizes, enhancing reading math, and science programs; retaining teachers; and expanding student access to after school programs, shall Franklin-McKinley School District\u2019s measure levying $72.00 per parcel annually for five years, be adopted, raising $1.2 million annually, have no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, provide a senior citizens\u2019 exemption and have all funds stay local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22012, "no_votes": 9164, "total_votes": 31176, "percent_yes": 70.60559404670259, "percent_no": 29.394405953297408, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure levies a $72 annual parcel tax for five years to raise approxima...", "summary_text": "This measure levies a $72 annual parcel tax for five years to raise approximately $1.2 million annually for the Franklin-McKinley School District to fund various educational programs including reading, tutoring, counseling, and after-school programs. The measure includes exemptions for senior citizens and prohibits use of funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.464230", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.921827", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.440632", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and enhance student achievement, by expanding reading, counseling and tutoring programs for at-risk students; maintaining small class sizes, enhancing reading math, and science programs; retaining teachers; and expanding student access to after school programs, shall Franklin-McKinley School District\u2019s measure levying $72.00 per parcel annually for five years, be adopted, raising $1.2 million annually, have no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, provide a senior citizens\u2019 exemption and have all funds stay local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3258, "fingerprint": "2020|202000640|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000640|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "38d26e1e9e153416", "measure_id": "202000640", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain high-quality teachers; increase teacher salaries; improve preparation for careers in technical fields including engineering, computer science, and health care; provide student mental health and suicide prevention services; and provide local high school students academic opportunities comparable to neighboring school districts, shall the Campbell Union High School District assess an annual parcel tax of $298 for 8 years, exempting senior citizens, providing approximately $16,600,000 annually, subject to independent oversight, annual audits, and local control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37538, "no_votes": 25554, "total_votes": 63092, "percent_yes": 59.497242122614594, "percent_no": 40.502757877385406, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Campbell Union High School District to ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Campbell Union High School District to assess an annual $298 parcel tax for 8 years to fund teacher salary increases, career preparation programs, mental health services, and academic opportunities, generating approximately $16.6 million annually. The measure failed despite receiving 59.5% support, likely requiring a two-thirds majority for passage.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.916964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.437071", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain high-quality teachers; increase teacher salaries; improve preparation for careers in technical fields including engineering, computer science, and health care; provide student mental health and suicide prevention services; and provide local high school students academic opportunities comparable to neighboring school districts, shall the Campbell Union High School District assess an annual parcel tax of $298 for 8 years, exempting senior citizens, providing approximately $16,600,000 annually, subject to independent oversight, annual audits, and local control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11158, "fingerprint": "2020|202000655|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000655|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cc50cba6f91c502b", "measure_id": "202000655", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure students receive engaging distance learning instruction that accelerates learning and can safely return to in-person school with smaller class sizes to facilitate social distancing guidelines as the pandemic subsides, shall the Campbell Union High School District measure be adopted renewing an existing $85 annual parcel tax that can be ended by voters, providing approximately $4,814,485 annually, exempting senior and qualified disabled citizens, subject to independent oversight, annual audits, and local control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63722, "no_votes": 39359, "total_votes": 103081, "percent_yes": 61.817405729474885, "percent_no": 38.182594270525115, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have renewed an existing $85 annual parcel tax for the Camp...", "summary_text": "The measure would have renewed an existing $85 annual parcel tax for the Campbell Union High School District, generating approximately $4.8 million annually for distance learning instruction and smaller class sizes, with exemptions for seniors and qualified disabled citizens. Despite receiving 61.8% voter approval, the measure failed because it did not meet the required two-thirds majority threshold for parcel tax measures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.463835", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.921270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.440143", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure students receive engaging distance learning instruction that accelerates learning and can safely return to in-person school with smaller class sizes to facilitate social distancing guidelines as the pandemic subsides, shall the Campbell Union High School District measure be adopted renewing an existing $85 annual parcel tax that can be ended by voters, providing approximately $4,814,485 annually, exempting senior and qualified disabled citizens, subject to independent oversight, annual audits, and local control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3268, "fingerprint": "2020|202000652|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000652|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "884757af9f5f5d8c", "measure_id": "202000652", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To strengthen student safety by installing secure school entrances, fencing/cameras; to construct a multipurpose building/cafeteria for assembly, nutrition and healthy meals to support learning; and to install solar panels for clean energy and lower utility costs, shall the San Benito High School District measure authorizing $30,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 1.3 cents per $100 assessed value ($1,650,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 44, "percent_yes": 38.63636363636363, "percent_no": 61.36363636363637, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the San Benito High School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the San Benito High School District to issue $30 million in bonds to fund security improvements (secure entrances, fencing, cameras), construct a multipurpose building/cafeteria, and install solar panels. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of approximately 1.3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.920326", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.439388", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To strengthen student safety by installing secure school entrances, fencing/cameras; to construct a multipurpose building/cafeteria for assembly, nutrition and healthy meals to support learning; and to install solar panels for clean energy and lower utility costs, shall the San Benito High School District measure authorizing $30,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately 1.3 cents per $100 assessed value ($1,650,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11161, "fingerprint": "2020|202000658|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000658|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "df2d36b9dfcdf936", "measure_id": "202000658", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renew its existing parcel tax without increasing the annual levy, support strong academic programs in reading, writing, math, science, technology and engineering, and prepare students for college and careers by attracting and retaining high quality teachers and staff, shall the Fremont Union High School District measure to renew its existing $98 parcel tax providing approximately $5 million annually for 8 years, with citizen oversight, exemptions for seniors, and all funds benefitting local high schools be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 69991, "no_votes": 25013, "total_votes": 95004, "percent_yes": 73.67163487853144, "percent_no": 26.328365121468565, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed the Fremont Union High School District's existing $98 an...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed the Fremont Union High School District's existing $98 annual parcel tax for 8 years, generating approximately $5 million per year for academic programs and staff retention. The renewal maintained the same tax rate without any increase and included senior exemptions and citizen oversight requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.464427", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.922103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.440844", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew its existing parcel tax without increasing the annual levy, support strong academic programs in reading, writing, math, science, technology and engineering, and prepare students for college and careers by attracting and retaining high quality teachers and staff, shall the Fremont Union High School District measure to renew its existing $98 parcel tax providing approximately $5 million annually for 8 years, with citizen oversight, exemptions for seniors, and all funds benefitting local high schools be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3263, "fingerprint": "2020|202000647|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000647|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5d0e1761603cab4a", "measure_id": "202000647", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and update local elementary and middle schools, including student learning environments for 21st-century learning; make essential school safety improvements; repair leaky roofs; maintain technology; repair, acquire, construct classrooms, equipment, sites/facilities; shall Moreland School District\u2019s measure authorizing $80,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $30/$100,000 assessed value ($5,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all funds for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7383, "no_votes": 5043, "total_votes": 12426, "percent_yes": 59.41574118783196, "percent_no": 40.58425881216804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Moreland School District to issue $80 million in ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Moreland School District to issue $80 million in bonds to repair, update, and construct school facilities, including safety improvements, roof repairs, technology maintenance, and classroom construction. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.918930", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.438428", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and update local elementary and middle schools, including student learning environments for 21st-century learning; make essential school safety improvements; repair leaky roofs; maintain technology; repair, acquire, construct classrooms, equipment, sites/facilities; shall Moreland School District\u2019s measure authorizing $80,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $30/$100,000 assessed value ($5,700,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all funds for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11162, "fingerprint": "2020|202000659|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000659|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ebcb6e2b21adb7c4", "measure_id": "202000659", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high academic achievement for local students and provide stable local funding to maintain outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math, history and science, retain qualified and experienced teachers, and prepare students for an excellent high school, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted, extending without increasing its $164 school parcel tax for seven years raising $328,000 annually, with senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and all funds benefitting local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 455, "no_votes": 190, "total_votes": 645, "percent_yes": 70.54263565891473, "percent_no": 29.457364341085267, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District's...", "summary_text": "This measure extends the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District's existing $164 annual parcel tax for seven years without increasing the rate, generating approximately $328,000 annually. The measure includes exemptions for seniors and requires independent citizen oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.464625", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.922380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.441027", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high academic achievement for local students and provide stable local funding to maintain outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math, history and science, retain qualified and experienced teachers, and prepare students for an excellent high school, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted, extending without increasing its $164 school parcel tax for seven years raising $328,000 annually, with senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and all funds benefitting local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3267, "fingerprint": "2020|202000651|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000651|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5db2743fc0888d7e", "measure_id": "202000651", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To allow local high school teachers and staff members to live in the community in which they work and improve the school district\u2019s ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees by constructing teacher-staff rental housing, shall Patterson Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $32.5 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates raising approximately $2 million for annual repayment while bonds are outstanding, projected levies of less than $0.04 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7, "no_votes": 30, "total_votes": 37, "percent_yes": 18.91891891891892, "percent_no": 81.08108108108108, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Patterson Joint Unified School Distric...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Patterson Joint Unified School District to issue $32.5 million in bonds to construct rental housing for teachers and staff. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than $0.04 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.920061", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.439184", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To allow local high school teachers and staff members to live in the community in which they work and improve the school district\u2019s ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees by constructing teacher-staff rental housing, shall Patterson Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $32.5 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates raising approximately $2 million for annual repayment while bonds are outstanding, projected levies of less than $0.04 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11164, "fingerprint": "2020|202000661|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000661|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b0d261874e3927f4", "measure_id": "202000661", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renew expiring local school funding that cannot be taken by the State; preserve excellence in academic programs, including science, math, reading, writing, arts/music; attract/retain qualified teachers and minimize layoffs; support at-risk students; shall Palo Alto Unified School District's measure be adopted, extending its current $836 parcel tax for six years, raising approximately $16,000,000 annually with senior exemptions, 2% annual inflation adjustment, independent citizen oversight, all funds benefiting local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31194, "no_votes": 9088, "total_votes": 40282, "percent_yes": 77.43905466461447, "percent_no": 22.560945335385526, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Palo Alto Unified School District's existing $836 annual...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Palo Alto Unified School District's existing $836 annual parcel tax for six years, generating approximately $16 million annually for local school programs and services. The tax includes exemptions for seniors, allows for 2% annual inflation adjustments, and requires independent citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.465017", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.923024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.441535", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew expiring local school funding that cannot be taken by the State; preserve excellence in academic programs, including science, math, reading, writing, arts/music; attract/retain qualified teachers and minimize layoffs; support at-risk students; shall Palo Alto Unified School District's measure be adopted, extending its current $836 parcel tax for six years, raising approximately $16,000,000 annually with senior exemptions, 2% annual inflation adjustment, independent citizen oversight, all funds benefiting local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3259, "fingerprint": "2020|202000641|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000641|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0a71763a58ee6178", "measure_id": "202000641", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain strong academic programs in reading, writing, math, engineering/science for local elementary and middle school students, protect music and art programs, and retain highly qualified teachers shall Cupertino Union School District\u2019s measure to levy $125 per year for 5 years, be approved, raising $4,321,500 annually that cannot be taken by the State, with exemptions for seniors, independent community oversight, no funds for administrators, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22705, "no_votes": 15323, "total_votes": 38028, "percent_yes": 59.70600610076785, "percent_no": 40.29399389923215, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Cupertino Union School District to lev...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Cupertino Union School District to levy a $125 annual parcel tax for 5 years to raise approximately $4.3 million annually for academic programs, arts, music, and teacher retention. The tax included exemptions for seniors and prohibited funds from being used for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.917234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.437256", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain strong academic programs in reading, writing, math, engineering/science for local elementary and middle school students, protect music and art programs, and retain highly qualified teachers shall Cupertino Union School District\u2019s measure to levy $125 per year for 5 years, be approved, raising $4,321,500 annually that cannot be taken by the State, with exemptions for seniors, independent community oversight, no funds for administrators, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11159, "fingerprint": "2020|202000656|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000656|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9d8773929062f628", "measure_id": "202000656", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student internet and computer access; upgrade school emergency preparedness; install campus security, emergency notification and communication alarms and systems; and retrofit and renovate classrooms and facilities throughout the District; shall Evergreen Elementary School District\u2019s measure to issue $80 million of bonds be adopted with projected annual tax rates averaging less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation for 12 years ($7.5 million per year for bond repayment), legal interest rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26413, "no_votes": 20588, "total_votes": 47001, "percent_yes": 56.196676666453904, "percent_no": 43.803323333546096, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Evergreen Elementary School District to issue $80...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Evergreen Elementary School District to issue $80 million in bonds to fund technology upgrades, emergency preparedness improvements, security systems, and classroom renovations. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed property value over 12 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.464031", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.921547", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.440385", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student internet and computer access; upgrade school emergency preparedness; install campus security, emergency notification and communication alarms and systems; and retrofit and renovate classrooms and facilities throughout the District; shall Evergreen Elementary School District\u2019s measure to issue $80 million of bonds be adopted with projected annual tax rates averaging less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation for 12 years ($7.5 million per year for bond repayment), legal interest rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3257, "fingerprint": "2020|202000639|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000639|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4518649edf4a7498", "measure_id": "202000639", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To help local elementary and middle schools attract/ retain high performing teachers, sustain strong academic and advanced programs in reading, writing, math, arts and sciences, ensure every student reads at/above grade level, keep teacher salaries competitive and train/support new teachers, shall a Campbell Union Elementary School District measure levying $98/ parcel annually, exempting senior citizens, be adopted, raising $2.36 million for 9 years, with independent community oversight, no funds for administrators, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15734, "no_votes": 9941, "total_votes": 25675, "percent_yes": 61.28140214216163, "percent_no": 38.71859785783837, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a $98 annual parcel tax on properties in the ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a $98 annual parcel tax on properties in the Campbell Union Elementary School District for 9 years to raise $2.36 million annually for teacher salaries, academic programs, and reading initiatives, with exemptions for senior citizens. The measure failed despite receiving 61.3% yes votes, likely because it required a two-thirds majority to pass.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.916700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.436886", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help local elementary and middle schools attract/ retain high performing teachers, sustain strong academic and advanced programs in reading, writing, math, arts and sciences, ensure every student reads at/above grade level, keep teacher salaries competitive and train/support new teachers, shall a Campbell Union Elementary School District measure levying $98/ parcel annually, exempting senior citizens, be adopted, raising $2.36 million for 9 years, with independent community oversight, no funds for administrators, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11163, "fingerprint": "2020|202000660|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000660|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "11289e64909597b3", "measure_id": "202000660", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire equipment/instructional technology to improve distance learning and internet access; renovate heating/cooling systems, aging restrooms; upgrade school emergency preparedness, outdated electrical wiring, handicapped accessibility; acquire, renovate, construct classrooms, equipment, sites and facilities, shall Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $12,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value, $975,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, pensions or benefits, and all money benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5621, "no_votes": 2931, "total_votes": 8552, "percent_yes": 65.72731524789522, "percent_no": 34.27268475210478, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Mt", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District to issue $12 million in bonds to fund equipment, technology, facility renovations, and infrastructure improvements including heating/cooling systems, electrical wiring, and accessibility upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $975,000 annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.464822", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.922756", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.441242", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire equipment/instructional technology to improve distance learning and internet access; renovate heating/cooling systems, aging restrooms; upgrade school emergency preparedness, outdated electrical wiring, handicapped accessibility; acquire, renovate, construct classrooms, equipment, sites and facilities, shall Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District\u2019s measure authorizing $12,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value, $975,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, pensions or benefits, and all money benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3269, "fingerprint": "2020|202000653|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000653|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0cda68db48be9f65", "measure_id": "202000653", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect academic excellence and maintain strong programs in reading, writing, science, technology, engineering, arts, and math for local elementary/middle school students; attract/retain high-quality teachers, and increase teacher resources, shall Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure to levy $149 per year for 6 years, raising $1.9 million annually that cannot be taken by the State, be adopted, with independent community oversight, no funds for administrators, exempting seniors, all funds locally-controlled benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8637, "no_votes": 6331, "total_votes": 14968, "percent_yes": 57.70309994655265, "percent_no": 42.29690005344735, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Union Elementary School District to levy a...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Union Elementary School District to levy a $149 annual parcel tax for six years to raise approximately $1.9 million annually for educational programs, teacher resources, and school improvements. The measure failed despite receiving majority support because it did not reach the required two-thirds threshold for passage.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.920738", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.439628", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect academic excellence and maintain strong programs in reading, writing, science, technology, engineering, arts, and math for local elementary/middle school students; attract/retain high-quality teachers, and increase teacher resources, shall Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure to levy $149 per year for 6 years, raising $1.9 million annually that cannot be taken by the State, be adopted, with independent community oversight, no funds for administrators, exempting seniors, all funds locally-controlled benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11157, "fingerprint": "2020|202000654|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000654|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d9316c55525367ed", "measure_id": "202000654", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/ upgrade aging classrooms, science labs, school facilities, and instructional technology to support student achievement in math, science, engineering, technology, and arts, repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, remove asbestos/lead pipes where needed, and upgrade classrooms/ computers to keep pace with technology, shall the Cambrian School District measure authorizing $88,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3 cents/ $100 assessed value ($5,080,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight/ all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9235, "no_votes": 5862, "total_votes": 15097, "percent_yes": 61.17109359475392, "percent_no": 38.82890640524608, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Cambrian School District to issue $88 million in ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Cambrian School District to issue $88 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including classrooms, science labs, roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and technology infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $5.08 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.463632", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.921006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.439892", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/ upgrade aging classrooms, science labs, school facilities, and instructional technology to support student achievement in math, science, engineering, technology, and arts, repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, remove asbestos/lead pipes where needed, and upgrade classrooms/ computers to keep pace with technology, shall the Cambrian School District measure authorizing $88,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying 3 cents/ $100 assessed value ($5,080,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight/ all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3262, "fingerprint": "2020|202000646|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000646|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "994b6fe0adab05a9", "measure_id": "202000646", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at local schools, shall Franklin-McKinley School District acquire / construct / modernize / repair classrooms, infrastructure, facilities, and fields improving all student access, including those with disabilities, to modern facilities, technology, teaching, and safety improvements, by issuing $80,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising approximately $5.2 million annually through 2050 at rates of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, and No money taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9589, "no_votes": 5001, "total_votes": 14590, "percent_yes": 65.72309801233722, "percent_no": 34.27690198766278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Franklin-McKinley School District to issue $80 mil...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Franklin-McKinley School District to issue $80 million in bonds to acquire, construct, modernize, and repair school facilities, classrooms, infrastructure, and fields. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, raising about $5.2 million annually through 2050.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.918662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.438238", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at local schools, shall Franklin-McKinley School District acquire / construct / modernize / repair classrooms, infrastructure, facilities, and fields improving all student access, including those with disabilities, to modern facilities, technology, teaching, and safety improvements, by issuing $80,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising approximately $5.2 million annually through 2050 at rates of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, and No money taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3247, "fingerprint": "2020|202000003|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000003|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3eccb7db899862ea", "measure_id": "202000003", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To preserve Caltrain service and support regional economic recovery, prevent traffic congestion, make Caltrain more affordable and accessible, reduce air pollution with cleaner and quieter electric trains, make travel times faster, and increase Caltrain frequency and capacity between Santa Clara, San Mateo and San Francisco counties, shall the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board's resolution levying a 30-year one-eighth cent sales tax with oversight and audits, providing approximately $100 million annually for Caltrain that the State cannot take away, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 528238, "no_votes": 270494, "total_votes": 798732, "percent_yes": 66.1345732986784, "percent_no": 33.865426701321596, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized a 30-year one-eighth cent sales tax in Santa Clara Co...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized a 30-year one-eighth cent sales tax in Santa Clara County to provide approximately $100 million annually for Caltrain operations and improvements. The tax supports maintaining service, electrification, increased frequency, and system enhancements for the commuter rail line connecting Santa Clara, San Mateo, and San Francisco counties.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.912695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.434138", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve Caltrain service and support regional economic recovery, prevent traffic congestion, make Caltrain more affordable and accessible, reduce air pollution with cleaner and quieter electric trains, make travel times faster, and increase Caltrain frequency and capacity between Santa Clara, San Mateo and San Francisco counties, shall the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board's resolution levying a 30-year one-eighth cent sales tax with oversight and audits, providing approximately $100 million annually for Caltrain that the State cannot take away, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3266, "fingerprint": "2020|202000650|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000650|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "aa3eda1e4a25eaa7", "measure_id": "202000650", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education, student achievement, and safety in neighborhood schools by: hiring, retaining, and training high-quality teachers; maintaining class sizes; expanding math, science and technology education; ensuring adequate student supervision and safety through appropriate staffing; and providing physical education programs. Shall the Oak Grove Elementary School District levy a parcel tax of $132 per parcel for nine years, providing $3.4 million ongoing annually, exempting seniors, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14365, "no_votes": 11550, "total_votes": 25915, "percent_yes": 55.43121744163612, "percent_no": 44.56878255836388, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Oak Grove Elementary School District to levy a $1...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Oak Grove Elementary School District to levy a $132 annual parcel tax for nine years to fund teacher hiring and training, maintain class sizes, expand STEM education, improve staffing for student supervision, and provide physical education programs. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and generates approximately $3.4 million annually with required audits and citizens' oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.919787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.438988", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education, student achievement, and safety in neighborhood schools by: hiring, retaining, and training high-quality teachers; maintaining class sizes; expanding math, science and technology education; ensuring adequate student supervision and safety through appropriate staffing; and providing physical education programs. Shall the Oak Grove Elementary School District levy a parcel tax of $132 per parcel for nine years, providing $3.4 million ongoing annually, exempting seniors, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3265, "fingerprint": "2020|202000649|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000649|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "77b219f7a2fba130", "measure_id": "202000649", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe/modern classrooms, arts/science labs at neighborhood schools for quality education; relieve student overcrowding; replace aging roofs, inefficient heating/ventilation systems; upgrade, acquire, construct classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment; shall Mountain View Whisman School District's measure authorizing $259,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30/$100,000 assessed value ($18,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all funds controlled locally for Mountain View schools, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13285, "no_votes": 5831, "total_votes": 19116, "percent_yes": 69.4967566436493, "percent_no": 30.503243356350694, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Mountain View Whisman School District to issue $2...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Mountain View Whisman School District to issue $259 million in bonds to fund classroom construction and upgrades, replace aging infrastructure like roofs and heating systems, and address student overcrowding. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.919514", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.438806", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe/modern classrooms, arts/science labs at neighborhood schools for quality education; relieve student overcrowding; replace aging roofs, inefficient heating/ventilation systems; upgrade, acquire, construct classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment; shall Mountain View Whisman School District's measure authorizing $259,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30/$100,000 assessed value ($18,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all funds controlled locally for Mountain View schools, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3256, "fingerprint": "2020|202000638|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000638|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ce698cd03ff61c93", "measure_id": "202000638", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/update local elementary/middle schools, including science, arts and math classrooms/labs for 21st-century learning; make essential safety and security improvements; replace aging fire alarms; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, equipment, sites/facilities; shall Berryessa Union School District's measure authorizing $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $28.50/ $100,000 assessed value ($6,300,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10420, "no_votes": 7438, "total_votes": 17858, "percent_yes": 58.34919923843656, "percent_no": 41.65080076156344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Berryessa Union School District to issue $98 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Berryessa Union School District to issue $98 million in bonds to repair and update elementary and middle schools, including classrooms, labs, safety systems, and facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of $28.50 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.916406", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.436702", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/update local elementary/middle schools, including science, arts and math classrooms/labs for 21st-century learning; make essential safety and security improvements; replace aging fire alarms; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, equipment, sites/facilities; shall Berryessa Union School District's measure authorizing $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $28.50/ $100,000 assessed value ($6,300,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3261, "fingerprint": "2020|202000643|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000643|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "89cec080be1f4f9d", "measure_id": "202000643", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire computers and classroom technology for improved student access; install campus security/emergency notification and communication alarms and systems; and renovate and modernize aging classrooms and facilities throughout the District; shall Evergreen Elementary School District's measure authorizing $125,000,000 in bonds, with legal interest rates, projected yearly tax rates averaging less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation raising an average $7.3 million per year for 18 years, annual audits and citizens' oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12835, "no_votes": 11639, "total_votes": 24474, "percent_yes": 52.4434093323527, "percent_no": 47.5565906676473, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Evergreen Elementary School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Evergreen Elementary School District to issue $125 million in bonds to fund computer and classroom technology purchases, security system installations, and classroom and facility renovations. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes averaging less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation over 18 years.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.917841", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.437665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire computers and classroom technology for improved student access; install campus security/emergency notification and communication alarms and systems; and renovate and modernize aging classrooms and facilities throughout the District; shall Evergreen Elementary School District's measure authorizing $125,000,000 in bonds, with legal interest rates, projected yearly tax rates averaging less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation raising an average $7.3 million per year for 18 years, annual audits and citizens' oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3273, "fingerprint": "2020|202000393|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000393|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ad411742fd1dc2da", "measure_id": "202000393", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Drew Glover be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13416, "no_votes": 11796, "total_votes": 25212, "percent_yes": 53.21275583055688, "percent_no": 46.78724416944312, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked Santa Cruz voters whether to recall (remove) Drew G...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked Santa Cruz voters whether to recall (remove) Drew Glover from his position as a City Council Member. The recall passed with 53.2% of voters choosing to remove Glover from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.925248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.443550", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Drew Glover be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3274, "fingerprint": "2020|202000394|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000394|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "25571637f9eec7e9", "measure_id": "202000394", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chris Krohn be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12713, "no_votes": 12206, "total_votes": 24919, "percent_yes": 51.0172960391669, "percent_no": 48.9827039608331, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked Santa Cruz voters whether to recall (remove) Chris Krohn f...", "summary_text": "This measure asked Santa Cruz voters whether to recall (remove) Chris Krohn from his position on the City Council. The recall passed with 51.0% of voters choosing to remove Krohn from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.925779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.443733", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chris Krohn be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3284, "fingerprint": "2020|202000671|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000671|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "c2bfa7c7485bc7df", "measure_id": "202000671", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; make necessary health, safety, and ventilation improvements; repair or replace leaky roofs and deteriorating plumbing, sewer, wiring and electrical systems; shall Scotts Valley Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $49,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $2.7 million annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3.2 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6057, "no_votes": 5397, "total_votes": 11454, "percent_yes": 52.88108957569408, "percent_no": 47.11891042430592, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Scotts Valley Unified School District ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Scotts Valley Unified School District to issue $49 million in bonds to fund health, safety, and infrastructure improvements including roof repairs, plumbing, electrical systems, and ventilation upgrades. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3.2 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $2.7 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.929023", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.445643", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; make necessary health, safety, and ventilation improvements; repair or replace leaky roofs and deteriorating plumbing, sewer, wiring and electrical systems; shall Scotts Valley Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $49,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $2.7 million annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3.2 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3276, "fingerprint": "2020|202000664|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000664|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "c054ba28a5194697", "measure_id": "202000664", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize classrooms and facilities; undertake seismic and earthquake safety upgrades and repairs; and qualify for state matching funds, shall the measure to reauthorize $4.2 million of Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s bonds, previously approved by voters in 2010, as new bonds with legal rates, projected yearly average levies less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2031 (generating an average $455,000 dollars per year), annual audits and taxpayer oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11, "no_votes": 7, "total_votes": 18, "percent_yes": 61.11111111111112, "percent_no": 38.88888888888888, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reauthorized $4", "summary_text": "This measure reauthorized $4.2 million in school bonds previously approved in 2010 for the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to repair and modernize classrooms, make seismic safety upgrades, and qualify for state matching funds. The bonds would be funded through property tax levies averaging less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2031.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.926572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.444115", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize classrooms and facilities; undertake seismic and earthquake safety upgrades and repairs; and qualify for state matching funds, shall the measure to reauthorize $4.2 million of Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s bonds, previously approved by voters in 2010, as new bonds with legal rates, projected yearly average levies less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation through approximately 2031 (generating an average $455,000 dollars per year), annual audits and taxpayer oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3283, "fingerprint": "2020|202000670|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000670|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "40d19a7a9b03fdc5", "measure_id": "202000670", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high academic achievement for local students and provide stable local funding to maintain outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math, history and science, retain qualified and experienced teachers, and prepare students for an excellent high school, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District's measure be adopted, extending without increasing its $164 school parcel tax for seven years raising $328,000 annually, with senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and all funds benefitting local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1609, "no_votes": 889, "total_votes": 2498, "percent_yes": 64.41152922337871, "percent_no": 35.58847077662129, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have extended the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary Schoo...", "summary_text": "This measure would have extended the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District's existing $164 annual parcel tax for seven years without increasing the rate, generating approximately $328,000 per year for school operations. The measure included exemptions for seniors and required independent citizen oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.928661", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.445457", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high academic achievement for local students and provide stable local funding to maintain outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math, history and science, retain qualified and experienced teachers, and prepare students for an excellent high school, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District's measure be adopted, extending without increasing its $164 school parcel tax for seven years raising $328,000 annually, with senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and all funds benefitting local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3282, "fingerprint": "2020|202000457|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000457|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "fb759e72bb4cec1e", "measure_id": "202000457", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student safety and school security, repair classrooms and facilities including wiring, plumbing and roofs; construct new classrooms; and qualify for state matching funds shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $30.5 million of bonds with legal rates, yearly projected average levies less than $0.051 /$100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating an average $2 million dollars per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no projected increase in current tax rates be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41, "no_votes": 16, "total_votes": 57, "percent_yes": 71.9298245614035, "percent_no": 28.070175438596493, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue $30", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue $30.5 million in bonds to fund classroom and facility repairs, construct new classrooms, and improve school safety and security. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at projected average levies of less than $0.051 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.928357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.445263", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student safety and school security, repair classrooms and facilities including wiring, plumbing and roofs; construct new classrooms; and qualify for state matching funds shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $30.5 million of bonds with legal rates, yearly projected average levies less than $0.051 /$100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating an average $2 million dollars per year), annual audits, independent oversight and no projected increase in current tax rates be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3277, "fingerprint": "2020|202000665|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000665|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "2da90ee818dc47ba", "measure_id": "202000665", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by modernizing aging classrooms, technology/science labs; upgrading outdated wiring/ sewer lines; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $274,100,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $19/$100,000 assessed valuation ($17,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, with audits,  no funding for administrators, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51412, "no_votes": 45165, "total_votes": 96577, "percent_yes": 53.23420690226451, "percent_no": 46.76579309773549, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Cabrillo Community College District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Cabrillo Community College District to issue $274.1 million in bonds to repair and upgrade classrooms, laboratories, technology infrastructure, and facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of $19 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.926849", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.444307", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by modernizing aging classrooms, technology/science labs; upgrading outdated wiring/ sewer lines; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $274,100,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $19/$100,000 assessed valuation ($17,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be approved, with audits,  no funding for administrators, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3278, "fingerprint": "2020|202000666|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000666|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "1158ba22208d6b02", "measure_id": "202000666", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair or replace roofs; construct Science/Engineering and Career Technical Education facilities; and make health and safety improvements; shall San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $75,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $4.3 million annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits,  citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6055, "no_votes": 4931, "total_votes": 10986, "percent_yes": 55.11560167485892, "percent_no": 44.88439832514108, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District to issue $75 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including roof repairs, construction of Science/Engineering and Career Technical Education facilities, and health and safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $4.3 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.927135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.444501", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; repair or replace roofs; construct Science/Engineering and Career Technical Education facilities; and make health and safety improvements; shall San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $75,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $4.3 million annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits,  citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3280, "fingerprint": "2020|202000668|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000668|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "7f95f469cf4ae72b", "measure_id": "202000668", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect educational quality in local high schools (grades 9-12) and continue funding Career Technical Education, science, technology, engineering, arts, counseling, library and athletic programs keeping kids safe and engaged in school, shall the Santa Cruz City High School District measure renewing its expiring parcel tax at the current $110 per parcel annual rate be adopted, continuing $3.7 million in annual school funding until ended by voters, without raising tax rates, including senior exemptions and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36985, "no_votes": 12994, "total_votes": 49979, "percent_yes": 74.00108045379059, "percent_no": 25.998919546209407, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an expiring parcel tax of $110 per parcel annually for t...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an expiring parcel tax of $110 per parcel annually for the Santa Cruz City High School District to continue funding educational programs including career technical education, STEM, arts, counseling, library and athletic programs. The renewal maintains the existing tax rate and continues approximately $3.7 million in annual local school funding with senior exemptions included.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.927799", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.444886", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect educational quality in local high schools (grades 9-12) and continue funding Career Technical Education, science, technology, engineering, arts, counseling, library and athletic programs keeping kids safe and engaged in school, shall the Santa Cruz City High School District measure renewing its expiring parcel tax at the current $110 per parcel annual rate be adopted, continuing $3.7 million in annual school funding until ended by voters, without raising tax rates, including senior exemptions and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3279, "fingerprint": "2020|202000667|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000667|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "f975eecf55ac30cb", "measure_id": "202000667", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue funding core programs in science, art and music that support student achievement at Santa Cruz elementary and middle schools, attract/retain highly qualified teachers, provide library and counseling services, and maintain smaller class sizes, shall the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District\u2019s measure renewing the expiring Santa Cruz City Elementary School District\u2019s and Santa Cruz City High School District\u2019s parcel tax at a rate of $208 per parcel be adopted, providing $3.2 million in annual school funding until ended by voters, including senior exemptions, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21303, "no_votes": 5377, "total_votes": 26680, "percent_yes": 79.84632683658171, "percent_no": 20.15367316341829, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an expiring parcel tax of $208 per parcel to provide $3", "summary_text": "This measure renews an expiring parcel tax of $208 per parcel to provide $3.2 million annually for the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District to fund science, art and music programs, teacher retention, library and counseling services, and smaller class sizes. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.927442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.444690", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding core programs in science, art and music that support student achievement at Santa Cruz elementary and middle schools, attract/retain highly qualified teachers, provide library and counseling services, and maintain smaller class sizes, shall the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District\u2019s measure renewing the expiring Santa Cruz City Elementary School District\u2019s and Santa Cruz City High School District\u2019s parcel tax at a rate of $208 per parcel be adopted, providing $3.2 million in annual school funding until ended by voters, including senior exemptions, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3281, "fingerprint": "2020|202000669|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000669|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "b5cb31ff03e3d44e", "measure_id": "202000669", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education in local elementary/middle schools by attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers/school staff; preserving strong academic programs in reading, writing, math, science, technology, arts and music; maintaining small class sizes; and providing locally controlled funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Soquel Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure levying $96 per parcel annually for 6 years be adopted, raising approximately $1,500,000 annually with independent oversight, senior exemptions, and all funds benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7407, "no_votes": 4256, "total_votes": 11663, "percent_yes": 63.50853125267941, "percent_no": 36.49146874732059, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a $96 annual parcel tax for 6 years on proper...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a $96 annual parcel tax for 6 years on properties within the Soquel Union Elementary School District to raise approximately $1.5 million annually for teacher retention, academic programs, small class sizes, and other school operations. The measure included senior exemptions and independent oversight but failed despite receiving 63.5% support, which was below the required two-thirds majority for parcel tax approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.928075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.445074", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education in local elementary/middle schools by attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers/school staff; preserving strong academic programs in reading, writing, math, science, technology, arts and music; maintaining small class sizes; and providing locally controlled funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Soquel Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure levying $96 per parcel annually for 6 years be adopted, raising approximately $1,500,000 annually with independent oversight, senior exemptions, and all funds benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3272, "fingerprint": "2020|202000391|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000391|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "4ee618cb6a80a930", "measure_id": "202000391", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to allow the City of Santa Cruz greater flexibility in contracting for public works construction projects, such as major planned improvements in City infrastructure, shall the City of Santa Cruz Charter be amended to allow for the use of design-build or other best value procurement for public works construction, to be established by ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18826, "no_votes": 4394, "total_votes": 23220, "percent_yes": 81.07665805340224, "percent_no": 18.92334194659776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Santa Cruz City Charter to allow the city to use des...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Santa Cruz City Charter to allow the city to use design-build and other best value procurement methods for public works construction projects, which would be established through ordinances. Previously, the city was limited to traditional procurement methods for such projects.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.924777", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.443365", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to allow the City of Santa Cruz greater flexibility in contracting for public works construction projects, such as major planned improvements in City infrastructure, shall the City of Santa Cruz Charter be amended to allow for the use of design-build or other best value procurement for public works construction, to be established by ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3270, "fingerprint": "2020|202000392|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000392|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "01d47909a7ac15d9", "measure_id": "202000392", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to allow Santa Cruz City Schools District to conduct elections by trustee areas adopted by the District, rather than specifying the makeup of the School District Board of Trustees in the City Charter, shall the City of Santa Cruz Charter be amended to rescind Article XVI?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17179, "no_votes": 4646, "total_votes": 21825, "percent_yes": 78.71248568155784, "percent_no": 21.287514318442163, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended the Santa Cruz City Charter by removing Article XVI, whic...", "summary_text": "The measure amended the Santa Cruz City Charter by removing Article XVI, which specified the makeup of the School District Board of Trustees, in order to allow the Santa Cruz City Schools District to conduct elections by trustee areas rather than at-large.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.923997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.442970", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to allow Santa Cruz City Schools District to conduct elections by trustee areas adopted by the District, rather than specifying the makeup of the School District Board of Trustees in the City Charter, shall the City of Santa Cruz Charter be amended to rescind Article XVI?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3271, "fingerprint": "2020|202000396|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000396|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "71e6bfe07b758244", "measure_id": "202000396", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fight crime, save lives, ensure rapid 911 response to medical emergencies and fires and keep Watsonville safe by maintaining and increasing: after-school youth programs and safe places to keep teens out of trouble, neighborhood patrols, police officers, firefighters and paramedics and lifesaving public safety equipment; shall Watsonville continue its existing one-half-cent sales tax until repealed by voters, restricted to  specific uses, subject to independent citizens\u2019 oversight and audits, providing $4 million annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6343, "no_votes": 1727, "total_votes": 8070, "percent_yes": 78.5997521685254, "percent_no": 21.4002478314746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues Watsonville's existing half-cent sales tax indefinitel...", "summary_text": "This measure continues Watsonville's existing half-cent sales tax indefinitely to fund public safety services including police, fire, paramedics, youth programs, and related equipment, generating approximately $4 million annually with citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.924368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.443166", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fight crime, save lives, ensure rapid 911 response to medical emergencies and fires and keep Watsonville safe by maintaining and increasing: after-school youth programs and safe places to keep teens out of trouble, neighborhood patrols, police officers, firefighters and paramedics and lifesaving public safety equipment; shall Watsonville continue its existing one-half-cent sales tax until repealed by voters, restricted to  specific uses, subject to independent citizens\u2019 oversight and audits, providing $4 million annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3275, "fingerprint": "2020|202000395|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000395|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "047e369acd58b66a", "measure_id": "202000395", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect Scotts Valley\u2019s quality of life,  maintain financial stability, avoid significant cuts and support city services, such as local 9-1-1 dispatch and emergency police response;  wildfire/ emergency preparation; recruiting/ retaining experienced police officers;  city road, storm drain and parks maintenance; and other general services, shall a 1.25% sales tax be adopted, eliminating the existing 0.50% sales tax and generating approximately $3,300,000 annually for twelve years, with all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3353, "no_votes": 1863, "total_votes": 5216, "percent_yes": 64.2829754601227, "percent_no": 35.7170245398773, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopted a 1", "summary_text": "This measure adopted a 1.25% sales tax in Scotts Valley for twelve years, replacing an existing 0.50% sales tax and generating approximately $3.3 million annually for general city services including emergency services, police, infrastructure maintenance, and parks.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.926178", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.443921", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect Scotts Valley\u2019s quality of life,  maintain financial stability, avoid significant cuts and support city services, such as local 9-1-1 dispatch and emergency police response;  wildfire/ emergency preparation; recruiting/ retaining experienced police officers;  city road, storm drain and parks maintenance; and other general services, shall a 1.25% sales tax be adopted, eliminating the existing 0.50% sales tax and generating approximately $3,300,000 annually for twelve years, with all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3285, "fingerprint": "2020|202000070|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000070|SHASTA", "content_hash": "27cc7953be2cdc86", "measure_id": "202000070", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide approximately $31,000,000 annually for the specific public safety purposes of (1) providing funding for County jail facilities, operations, programs, and services, including medication assisted treatment and rehabilitation programs while in custody and also after release, and alternatives to County jail incarceration, (2) providing funding for law enforcement and emergency services (including fire protection) in the unincorporated area of Shasta County and in the Cities of Redding, Anderson, and Shasta Lake, (3) providing funding for criminal prosecutions by the District Attorney, for criminal defense by the Public Defender, and for the duties of Probation as they relate to adult offenders, the measure allows the County of Shasta to enact a one percent (1%) transactions and use tax throughout the entire county. The measure creates an Oversight Committee and an annual audit requirement detailing how the funds have been spent. The tax will be in effect until reduced or repealed by the Board of Supervisors by a 4/5 vote.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27669, "no_votes": 29375, "total_votes": 57044, "percent_yes": 48.504663067106094, "percent_no": 51.495336932893906, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Shasta County to enact a 1% sales tax to g...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Shasta County to enact a 1% sales tax to generate approximately $31 million annually for public safety purposes including jail facilities and programs, law enforcement, emergency services, criminal prosecution and defense, and probation services. The tax would have remained in effect until reduced or repealed by a 4/5 vote of the Board of Supervisors, with spending overseen by a committee and annual audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.929295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.445837", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide approximately $31,000,000 annually for the specific public safety purposes of (1) providing funding for County jail facilities, operations, programs, and services, including medication assisted treatment and rehabilitation programs while in custody and also after release, and alternatives to County jail incarceration, (2) providing funding for law enforcement and emergency services (including fire protection) in the unincorporated area of Shasta County and in the Cities of Redding, Anderson, and Shasta Lake, (3) providing funding for criminal prosecutions by the District Attorney, for criminal defense by the Public Defender, and for the duties of Probation as they relate to adult offenders, the measure allows the County of Shasta to enact a one percent (1%) transactions and use tax throughout the entire county. The measure creates an Oversight Committee and an annual audit requirement detailing how the funds have been spent. The tax will be in effect until reduced or repealed by the Board of Supervisors by a 4/5 vote.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3286, "fingerprint": "2020|202000397|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000397|SIERRA", "content_hash": "1e381228ef420364", "measure_id": "202000397", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance No. 1092 amending the Sierra County Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from 10% to 12.5%, effective July 1, 2021, for the privilege of occupying a lodging (as defined in section 5.20.010) within the unincorporated areas of Sierra County, which revenues from the 2.5% increase shall be dedicated solely for the purpose of providing emergency medical, fire or rescue services by the fire districts within Sierra County, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1414, "no_votes": 492, "total_votes": 1906, "percent_yes": 74.18677859391396, "percent_no": 25.813221406086043, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would increase Sierra County's transient occupancy tax on lodgin...", "summary_text": "This measure would increase Sierra County's transient occupancy tax on lodging in unincorporated areas from 10% to 12.5%, with the additional 2.5% revenue dedicated exclusively to funding emergency medical, fire, and rescue services provided by local fire districts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.929603", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.446020", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance No. 1092 amending the Sierra County Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from 10% to 12.5%, effective July 1, 2021, for the privilege of occupying a lodging (as defined in section 5.20.010) within the unincorporated areas of Sierra County, which revenues from the 2.5% increase shall be dedicated solely for the purpose of providing emergency medical, fire or rescue services by the fire districts within Sierra County, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3289, "fingerprint": "2020|202000071|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000071|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "941d4f78b5f2dd1e", "measure_id": "202000071", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide funding (all funds used locally) for infrastructure and general County services, including, but not limited to, fire protection, law enforcement, rescue, emergency response and preparedness, and maintaining facilities and equipment, shall the County increase the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) rate from 8% to 12% on July 1, 2020, with an estimated increase of $340,000 generated annually from the resulting tax and will remain in effect until repealed or amended?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5053, "no_votes": 4299, "total_votes": 9352, "percent_yes": 54.03122326775021, "percent_no": 45.96877673224979, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Siskiyou County's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Siskiyou County's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 8% to 12%, effective July 1, 2020, to fund local infrastructure and general county services including fire protection, law enforcement, rescue, emergency response, and facility maintenance. The tax increase was estimated to generate an additional $340,000 annually and remains in effect until repealed or amended.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.930505", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.446573", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding (all funds used locally) for infrastructure and general County services, including, but not limited to, fire protection, law enforcement, rescue, emergency response and preparedness, and maintaining facilities and equipment, shall the County increase the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) rate from 8% to 12% on July 1, 2020, with an estimated increase of $340,000 generated annually from the resulting tax and will remain in effect until repealed or amended?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3291, "fingerprint": "2020|202000402|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000402|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "67e60252c0b1b6c3", "measure_id": "202000402", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 453-2019 regulating the commerical growth of Cannabis within the City requiring a license for such business operations, limiting who may obtain such license, and imposing regulations of the conduct of business operations to protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 568, "no_votes": 388, "total_votes": 956, "percent_yes": 59.41422594142259, "percent_no": 40.58577405857741, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure adopted Ordinance 453-2019, which requires licenses for commercia...", "summary_text": "The measure adopted Ordinance 453-2019, which requires licenses for commercial cannabis cultivation within the city, establishes eligibility restrictions for obtaining such licenses, and imposes operational regulations intended to protect residents' health, safety, and welfare.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.931032", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.446937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 453-2019 regulating the commerical growth of Cannabis within the City requiring a license for such business operations, limiting who may obtain such license, and imposing regulations of the conduct of business operations to protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3293, "fingerprint": "2020|202000404|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000404|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "90081138392cb1ed", "measure_id": "202000404", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be an appointed position?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1611, "no_votes": 1329, "total_votes": 2940, "percent_yes": 54.79591836734694, "percent_no": 45.20408163265306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the City Clerk position in Siskiyou from an elected offi...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the City Clerk position in Siskiyou from an elected office to an appointed position. The measure passed, meaning the City Clerk will now be appointed rather than elected by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.931698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.447302", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be an appointed position?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3287, "fingerprint": "2020|202000072|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000072|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "00d1bbc1b47be621", "measure_id": "202000072", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Greater McCloud Fire and Emergency Response Zone of County Service Area No. 4 levy an annual special parcel tax of $93.79 for improved parcels, $66.20 for the first two unimproved parcels, $24.83 for the third and fourth unimproved parcels, and $8.28 for the fifth or more unimproved parcels, subject to an annual cost of living increase for the first 10 years not to exceed three percent (3%) in any year, without expiration, for funding fire and emergency response services, collecting an estimated $86,158.14 annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 112, "no_votes": 59, "total_votes": 171, "percent_yes": 65.49707602339181, "percent_no": 34.50292397660819, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established an annual special parcel tax in the Great...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established an annual special parcel tax in the Greater McCloud Fire and Emergency Response Zone with rates ranging from $8.28 to $93.79 depending on parcel type and number, including annual cost of living increases up to 3% for the first 10 years, to fund fire and emergency response services. The measure failed despite receiving 65.5% support, presumably because it required a two-thirds majority to pass.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.929973", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.446205", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Greater McCloud Fire and Emergency Response Zone of County Service Area No. 4 levy an annual special parcel tax of $93.79 for improved parcels, $66.20 for the first two unimproved parcels, $24.83 for the third and fourth unimproved parcels, and $8.28 for the fifth or more unimproved parcels, subject to an annual cost of living increase for the first 10 years not to exceed three percent (3%) in any year, without expiration, for funding fire and emergency response services, collecting an estimated $86,158.14 annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3295, "fingerprint": "2020|202000398|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000398|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "20cb91641a88f439", "measure_id": "202000398", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the City of Dunsmuir to collect a sales tax (Transaction and Use Tax) of 1.5 cents to be used for general City purposes and to remain in effect until repealed or amended by the electorate and which will raise approximately $200,000 annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 335, "no_votes": 507, "total_votes": 842, "percent_yes": 39.78622327790974, "percent_no": 60.21377672209026, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the City of Dunsmuir to collect a 1", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the City of Dunsmuir to collect a 1.5% sales tax for general city purposes, expected to generate approximately $200,000 annually. The tax would have remained in effect until repealed or amended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.932227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.447671", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the City of Dunsmuir to collect a sales tax (Transaction and Use Tax) of 1.5 cents to be used for general City purposes and to remain in effect until repealed or amended by the electorate and which will raise approximately $200,000 annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3288, "fingerprint": "2020|202000073|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000073|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "6ef70582b155f291", "measure_id": "202000073", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Lake Shastina Community Services District, to provide continued rapid response for fire protection and medical emergencies to the owners and properties within the District, increase the existing special parcel tax for fire services to $80 annually for improved parcels and $65 annually for unimproved parcels generating an annual amount of revenue of $271,240 and which will continue to be levied until repealed by the Board of by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1018, "no_votes": 425, "total_votes": 1443, "percent_yes": 70.54747054747055, "percent_no": 29.452529452529447, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased the existing special parcel tax for the Lake Shastina C...", "summary_text": "The measure increased the existing special parcel tax for the Lake Shastina Community Services District to $80 annually for improved parcels and $65 annually for unimproved parcels to fund fire protection and medical emergency services. The tax generates approximately $271,240 annually and continues until repealed by the Board or voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.930238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.446390", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lake Shastina Community Services District, to provide continued rapid response for fire protection and medical emergencies to the owners and properties within the District, increase the existing special parcel tax for fire services to $80 annually for improved parcels and $65 annually for unimproved parcels generating an annual amount of revenue of $271,240 and which will continue to be levied until repealed by the Board of by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3297, "fingerprint": "2020|202000672|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000672|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "c8fd9099ec18c909", "measure_id": "202000672", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To expand vocational education/science labs and educational facilities; upgrade school security/student safety including fire alarms/emergency smoke filtration systems; improve technology/remote access; retrofit/repair classrooms at Happy Camp, McCloud, Mt. Shasta and Weed High Schools and create local construction jobs, shall Siskiyou Union High Scholl District\u2019s measure authorizing $3,000,000 in bonds be adopted, levying an average less than $8/$100,000 assessed valuation (raising $228,928 annually until repaid), at legal rates, annual audits, independent oversight and all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5630, "no_votes": 3195, "total_votes": 8825, "percent_yes": 63.79603399433428, "percent_no": 36.20396600566572, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Siskiyou Union High School District to issue $3 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Siskiyou Union High School District to issue $3 million in bonds to expand vocational education and science labs, upgrade security and safety systems, improve technology infrastructure, and retrofit classrooms at four high schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging less than $8 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.932772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.448039", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand vocational education/science labs and educational facilities; upgrade school security/student safety including fire alarms/emergency smoke filtration systems; improve technology/remote access; retrofit/repair classrooms at Happy Camp, McCloud, Mt. Shasta and Weed High Schools and create local construction jobs, shall Siskiyou Union High Scholl District\u2019s measure authorizing $3,000,000 in bonds be adopted, levying an average less than $8/$100,000 assessed valuation (raising $228,928 annually until repaid), at legal rates, annual audits, independent oversight and all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3290, "fingerprint": "2020|202000399|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000399|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "5233f1f601937679", "measure_id": "202000399", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted amending the Mt. Shasta Municipal Code relating to the licensing and regulation of Industrial Cannabis businesses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 782, "no_votes": 1145, "total_votes": 1927, "percent_yes": 40.58121432278153, "percent_no": 59.41878567721847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended Mt", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended Mt. Shasta's municipal code to establish a licensing and regulatory framework for industrial cannabis businesses operating within the city. The measure failed with 40.6% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.930767", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.446757", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted amending the Mt. Shasta Municipal Code relating to the licensing and regulation of Industrial Cannabis businesses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3296, "fingerprint": "2020|202000403|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000403|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "4af0411e5ecf840e", "measure_id": "202000403", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Weed impose a Transactions and Use Tax of 0.25% (1/4th of Once Percent) of gross receipts from any sale or use pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code sec. 7285.9 for general municipal purposes, including parks and recreation, police and fire protection, street and cemetery maintenance, and for an emergency reserve fund? This tax increase does  not have termination date. Estimated revenue: $260,000 annually.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 474, "no_votes": 486, "total_votes": 960, "percent_yes": 49.375, "percent_no": 50.625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a 0.25% transactions and use tax in the City of Weed for general municipal purposes including parks, recreation, police, fire protection, street maintenance, cemetery maintenance, and an emergency reserve fund. The tax would have generated an estimated $260,000 annually and had no termination date.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.932499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.447855", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Weed impose a Transactions and Use Tax of 0.25% (1/4th of Once Percent) of gross receipts from any sale or use pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code sec. 7285.9 for general municipal purposes, including parks and recreation, police and fire protection, street and cemetery maintenance, and for an emergency reserve fund? This tax increase does  not have termination date. Estimated revenue: $260,000 annually.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3292, "fingerprint": "2020|202000400|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000400|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "b26e6d29a9d399df", "measure_id": "202000400", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Tulelake levy an annual parcel special tax for Public Safety which will be used to pay for police operations, training and supplies, personnel, equipment, law enforcement, dispatch, code enforcement and animal control, on each improved legal parcel within the City, which shall be payable in an annual special parcel tax of $60.00, subject to the annual increase of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), without expiration, collecting an estimated $27,000 annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44, "no_votes": 133, "total_votes": 177, "percent_yes": 24.858757062146893, "percent_no": 75.14124293785311, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a $60 annual parcel tax on each improved legal...", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a $60 annual parcel tax on each improved legal parcel in Tulelake to fund police operations, training, equipment, dispatch, code enforcement, and animal control services. The tax would have been adjusted annually for inflation without expiration and was estimated to generate $27,000 per year.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.931328", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.447121", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Tulelake levy an annual parcel special tax for Public Safety which will be used to pay for police operations, training and supplies, personnel, equipment, law enforcement, dispatch, code enforcement and animal control, on each improved legal parcel within the City, which shall be payable in an annual special parcel tax of $60.00, subject to the annual increase of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), without expiration, collecting an estimated $27,000 annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3294, "fingerprint": "2020|202000401|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000401|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "1e130e2d811fcb42", "measure_id": "202000401", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Tulelake pass a transient occupancy tax (hotel tax or TOT), with a taxation rate of 8% of the rent charged by the operator, for use on general city services uses including infrastructure, city promotion, community events, economic enhancement and community beautification with the TOT collected estimated to raise $2,000 - $10,000 per year and will remain in effect until repealed or amended?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59, "no_votes": 112, "total_votes": 171, "percent_yes": 34.50292397660818, "percent_no": 65.49707602339183, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established an 8% transient occupancy tax on hotel ren...", "summary_text": "The measure would have established an 8% transient occupancy tax on hotel rentals in Tulelake, with revenue estimated at $2,000-$10,000 annually to fund general city services including infrastructure, promotion, events, and beautification. The tax would have remained in effect until repealed or amended by the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.931963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.447487", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Tulelake pass a transient occupancy tax (hotel tax or TOT), with a taxation rate of 8% of the rent charged by the operator, for use on general city services uses including infrastructure, city promotion, community events, economic enhancement and community beautification with the TOT collected estimated to raise $2,000 - $10,000 per year and will remain in effect until repealed or amended?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3305, "fingerprint": "2020|202000408|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000408|SOLANO", "content_hash": "9aedc495bdec0da3", "measure_id": "202000408", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance imposing a cannabis business tax be adopted with the City taxing cannabis or hemp businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses which is expected to generate an estimated $237,500 to $360,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30462, "no_votes": 16489, "total_votes": 46951, "percent_yes": 64.88040723307277, "percent_no": 35.11959276692723, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Solano to impose taxes on cannabis busine...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Solano to impose taxes on cannabis businesses at rates up to $10 per square foot annually for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis operations. The tax was estimated to generate $237,500 to $360,000 annually and would remain in effect until repealed by voters or the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.935116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.449505", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance imposing a cannabis business tax be adopted with the City taxing cannabis or hemp businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses which is expected to generate an estimated $237,500 to $360,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3298, "fingerprint": "2020|202000405|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000405|SOLANO", "content_hash": "274e4e24cd27110b", "measure_id": "202000405", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City allow any new retail cannabis dispensaries in Benicia?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8730, "no_votes": 8158, "total_votes": 16888, "percent_yes": 51.69351018474656, "percent_no": 48.30648981525344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked Solano County voters whether the City of Benicia ...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked Solano County voters whether the City of Benicia should allow new retail cannabis dispensaries to operate within city limits. The measure passed with 51.7% support, providing non-binding guidance to city officials on cannabis retail policy.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.933082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.448231", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City allow any new retail cannabis dispensaries in Benicia?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3307, "fingerprint": "2020|202000674|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000674|SOLANO", "content_hash": "cf1a302c69560162", "measure_id": "202000674", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing future tax rates, shall the measure to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom Lake and Sacramento City campuses for job training, nursing/ healthcare, engineering/ science and fire/ police programs, by Los Rios Community College District to authorize $650 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $52 million per year until repaid, an average tax levy less than $0.02 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and taxpayer oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 18, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Los Rios Community College District to issue $650...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Los Rios Community College District to issue $650 million in bonds to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at five campuses for various job training and educational programs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $52 million annually until repaid.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.936054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.450045", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing future tax rates, shall the measure to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom Lake and Sacramento City campuses for job training, nursing/ healthcare, engineering/ science and fire/ police programs, by Los Rios Community College District to authorize $650 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $52 million per year until repaid, an average tax levy less than $0.02 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and taxpayer oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11167, "fingerprint": "2020|202000673|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000673|SOLANO", "content_hash": "724957acbdfafcfa", "measure_id": "202000673", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain quality teachers and staff by keeping compensation competitive in order to (a) preserve outstanding instruction in math, science, reading, writing, history, social studies and technology; (b) support arts, music; (c) limit class sizes; and (d) support student health and safety; shall a Davis Joint Unified School District ongoing parcel tax of $198/year, adjusted annually for inflation, be adopted, raising approximately $3,000,000/year, with senior, disability, employee exemptions and citizens oversight; for Davis schools only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 19, "percent_yes": 68.42105263157895, "percent_no": 31.578947368421055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would establish an ongoing annual parcel tax of $198 per year (a...", "summary_text": "This measure would establish an ongoing annual parcel tax of $198 per year (adjusted for inflation) within the Davis Joint Unified School District to raise approximately $3 million annually for teacher compensation, instructional programs, arts and music, class size reduction, and student health and safety. The tax includes exemptions for seniors, disabled persons, and district employees, and requires citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.473006", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.935717", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.449864", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain quality teachers and staff by keeping compensation competitive in order to (a) preserve outstanding instruction in math, science, reading, writing, history, social studies and technology; (b) support arts, music; (c) limit class sizes; and (d) support student health and safety; shall a Davis Joint Unified School District ongoing parcel tax of $198/year, adjusted annually for inflation, be adopted, raising approximately $3,000,000/year, with senior, disability, employee exemptions and citizens oversight; for Davis schools only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3303, "fingerprint": "2020|202000413|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000413|SOLANO", "content_hash": "e6390ae8120dd54a", "measure_id": "202000413", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To retain jobs/ businesses; maintain City services, including fire protection, emergency medical response, crime prevention/ investigation, youth services, and addressing homelessness; enhance police transparency/accountability and ensure well-trained community police officers; and keep public spaces safe/clean; shall the City of Vallejo adopt a measure establishing a 3/4 cent sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $12,000,000 annually, requiring independent audits, and all funds spent in Vallejo?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25539, "no_votes": 26128, "total_votes": 51667, "percent_yes": 49.43000367739563, "percent_no": 50.56999632260437, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a 0.75% sales tax in Vallejo to generate approximately $12 million annually for city services including fire protection, emergency medical response, police services, youth programs, and homelessness services, with required independent audits and a provision allowing voters to end the tax in the future.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.934551", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.449143", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain jobs/ businesses; maintain City services, including fire protection, emergency medical response, crime prevention/ investigation, youth services, and addressing homelessness; enhance police transparency/accountability and ensure well-trained community police officers; and keep public spaces safe/clean; shall the City of Vallejo adopt a measure establishing a 3/4 cent sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $12,000,000 annually, requiring independent audits, and all funds spent in Vallejo?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3308, "fingerprint": "2020|202000675|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000675|SOLANO", "content_hash": "86293baaebf63865", "measure_id": "202000675", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; building science labs; updating aging technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $45,700,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6 cents/$100 of assessed value, averaging $2,600,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens' oversight/ all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3954, "no_votes": 2312, "total_votes": 6266, "percent_yes": 63.10245770826683, "percent_no": 36.89754229173317, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized River Delta Unified School District to issue $45,700,...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized River Delta Unified School District to issue $45,700,000 in bonds to fund school facility improvements including roof repairs, asbestos and mold removal, science lab construction, technology updates, and fire and water safety upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, with citizens' oversight and annual audits required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.936321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.450225", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; building science labs; updating aging technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $45,700,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6 cents/$100 of assessed value, averaging $2,600,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens' oversight/ all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3309, "fingerprint": "2020|202000676|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000676|SOLANO", "content_hash": "bd7bd94ea819879b", "measure_id": "202000676", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; keeping schools safe; updating technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/jobs/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $14,600,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6 cents/$100 of assessed value, averaging $845,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens' oversight/all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2, "no_votes": 4, "total_votes": 6, "percent_yes": 33.33333333333333, "percent_no": 66.66666666666667, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the River Delta Unified School District to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the River Delta Unified School District to issue $14.6 million in bonds to fund school facility repairs, safety upgrades, technology updates, and construction of educational facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.936587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.450409", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; keeping schools safe; updating technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/jobs/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $14,600,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6 cents/$100 of assessed value, averaging $845,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens' oversight/all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3306, "fingerprint": "2020|202000409|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000409|SOLANO", "content_hash": "04b4ea61e71bfb87", "measure_id": "202000409", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to support the continued operation of the City of Rio Vista's general services, including police, fire, parks, and other unrestricted general fund expenditures, by enacting a three-quarter (3/4) percent transactions and use tax for a period of five (5) years commencing on April 1, 2022, that is projected to provide between $1,149,000 and $1,344,000 of revenue annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3770, "no_votes": 2282, "total_votes": 6052, "percent_yes": 62.29345670852611, "percent_no": 37.70654329147389, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.75% sales tax in Rio Vista for five years starting April 1, 2022, projected to generate $1.1-1.3 million annually for general city services including police, fire, parks, and other general fund expenditures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.935418", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.449685", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to support the continued operation of the City of Rio Vista's general services, including police, fire, parks, and other unrestricted general fund expenditures, by enacting a three-quarter (3/4) percent transactions and use tax for a period of five (5) years commencing on April 1, 2022, that is projected to provide between $1,149,000 and $1,344,000 of revenue annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3300, "fingerprint": "2020|202000410|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000410|SOLANO", "content_hash": "7c2ded8f2b29e15e", "measure_id": "202000410", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, establishing a lifetime term limit of four (4) terms served as Mayor and member of the City Council, in which the terms served by a person elected or appointed to one elected office of the City Council shall be aggregated with terms served by that person in another elected office of the City Council, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9157, "no_votes": 2811, "total_votes": 11968, "percent_yes": 76.51236631016043, "percent_no": 23.48763368983957, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a lifetime limit of four terms total for serving as ...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a lifetime limit of four terms total for serving as Mayor or City Council member in Solano, with terms served in different elected city offices counting toward the same cumulative limit.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.933698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.448596", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, establishing a lifetime term limit of four (4) terms served as Mayor and member of the City Council, in which the terms served by a person elected or appointed to one elected office of the City Council shall be aggregated with terms served by that person in another elected office of the City Council, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3301, "fingerprint": "2020|202000411|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000411|SOLANO", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "202000411", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5541, "no_votes": 6277, "total_votes": 11818, "percent_yes": 46.88610594009139, "percent_no": 53.11389405990861, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.933961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.448782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3299, "fingerprint": "2020|202000406|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000406|SOLANO", "content_hash": "c0471ebdcd8a37dc", "measure_id": "202000406", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure adopting an ordinance that changes the office of the City Clerk from an appointed position to an elected position be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3600, "no_votes": 1370, "total_votes": 4970, "percent_yes": 72.43460764587525, "percent_no": 27.565392354124754, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure adopted an ordinance changing the City Clerk position in Solano f...", "summary_text": "The measure adopted an ordinance changing the City Clerk position in Solano from an appointed office to an elected office. This means the City Clerk will now be chosen by voters rather than appointed by city officials.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.933431", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.448416", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure adopting an ordinance that changes the office of the City Clerk from an appointed position to an elected position be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3304, "fingerprint": "2020|202000407|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000407|SOLANO", "content_hash": "d480c1f6d9d19d88", "measure_id": "202000407", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance that amends the City of Dixon's water charges to repeal those charges established on January 22, 2019 by Resolution 19-010 and replace them with the water changes collected by the City of Dixon in effect on January 1, 2019 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4923, "no_votes": 3662, "total_votes": 8585, "percent_yes": 57.34420500873617, "percent_no": 42.65579499126383, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure repealed water charges that were established in January 2019 and...", "summary_text": "This measure repealed water charges that were established in January 2019 and replaced them with the water charges that were in effect on January 1, 2019, essentially rolling back a rate change to earlier pricing levels.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.934849", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.449326", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance that amends the City of Dixon's water charges to repeal those charges established on January 22, 2019 by Resolution 19-010 and replace them with the water changes collected by the City of Dixon in effect on January 1, 2019 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3302, "fingerprint": "2020|202000412|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000412|SOLANO", "content_hash": "22609d46f8279b8c", "measure_id": "202000412", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis or hemp businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $400,000 to $600,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29201, "no_votes": 16110, "total_votes": 45311, "percent_yes": 64.44571958244136, "percent_no": 35.554280417558644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Solano to impose taxes on cannabis and he...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Solano to impose taxes on cannabis and hemp businesses at rates up to $10 per square foot for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis businesses to fund general municipal services. The tax was expected to generate $400,000 to $600,000 annually and would remain in effect until repealed by voters or the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.934225", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.448961", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis or hemp businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $400,000 to $600,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3310, "fingerprint": "2020|202000677|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000677|SOLANO", "content_hash": "7110118889570987", "measure_id": "202000677", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and complete improvement projects at Winters High and Waggoner Elementary; repair/replace leaky roofs; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Winters Joint Unified School District issue $19,000,000 of bonds, raising on average $1,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 245, "no_votes": 299, "total_votes": 544, "percent_yes": 45.03676470588235, "percent_no": 54.96323529411765, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized Winters Joint Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized Winters Joint Unified School District to issue $19 million in bonds to fund facility improvements at Winters High School and Waggoner Elementary School, including roof repairs, classroom modernization, and restroom upgrades. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $1 million annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.936851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.450599", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and complete improvement projects at Winters High and Waggoner Elementary; repair/replace leaky roofs; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Winters Joint Unified School District issue $19,000,000 of bonds, raising on average $1,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3325, "fingerprint": "2020|202000679|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000679|SONOMA", "content_hash": "d72e0971598415a4", "measure_id": "202000679", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of Geyserville schools; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall Geyserville Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $22,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1.3 million annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 4.4 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 426, "no_votes": 284, "total_votes": 710, "percent_yes": 60.0, "percent_no": 40.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Geyserville Unified School District to issue $22 ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Geyserville Unified School District to issue $22 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including HVAC systems, classrooms, restrooms, and roofs. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 4.4 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $1.3 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.941465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.453986", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of Geyserville schools; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall Geyserville Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $22,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1.3 million annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 4.4 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3329, "fingerprint": "2020|202000683|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000683|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a561f253f35bf2da", "measure_id": "202000683", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renew and provide stable funding that the State cannot take away; maintain and improve the schools\u2019 woodshop, culinary, media and other career technical education programs; keep school libraries open; and maintain/improve the schools\u2019 art, music and drama programs; shall the West Sonoma County Union High School District measure to levy $79.00 per parcel annually for eight years be adopted, raising $1,810,000 annually, have no funds for administrators' salaries, provide a senior citizens' exemption and have all funds stay local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16897, "no_votes": 7623, "total_votes": 24520, "percent_yes": 68.9110929853181, "percent_no": 31.088907014681894, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the West Sonoma County Union High School District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the West Sonoma County Union High School District to levy a $79 annual parcel tax for eight years to fund career technical education programs, school libraries, and arts programs. The tax was projected to raise $1,810,000 annually with exemptions for senior citizens and restrictions preventing use of funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.942690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.454804", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew and provide stable funding that the State cannot take away; maintain and improve the schools\u2019 woodshop, culinary, media and other career technical education programs; keep school libraries open; and maintain/improve the schools\u2019 art, music and drama programs; shall the West Sonoma County Union High School District measure to levy $79.00 per parcel annually for eight years be adopted, raising $1,810,000 annually, have no funds for administrators' salaries, provide a senior citizens' exemption and have all funds stay local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3324, "fingerprint": "2020|202000678|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000678|SONOMA", "content_hash": "da26722dd1f51fc7", "measure_id": "202000678", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools without increasing estimated tax rates; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Bellevue Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $28,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2962, "no_votes": 1983, "total_votes": 4945, "percent_yes": 59.898887765419616, "percent_no": 40.101112234580384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Bellevue Union School District to issue $28 milli...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Bellevue Union School District to issue $28 million in bonds to replace plumbing systems, improve technology access, and modernize classrooms and facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $1.8 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.941079", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.453784", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools without increasing estimated tax rates; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Bellevue Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $28,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3326, "fingerprint": "2020|202000680|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000680|SONOMA", "content_hash": "6af68e97178c125f", "measure_id": "202000680", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace roofs; acquire land; and make health and safety improvements, shall the Roseland Elementary School District measure authorizing $9,400,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($539,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a board appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1326, "no_votes": 793, "total_votes": 2119, "percent_yes": 62.57668711656442, "percent_no": 37.42331288343558, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Roseland Elementary School District to issue $9,4...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Roseland Elementary School District to issue $9,400,000 in bonds to modernize classrooms and facilities, repair roofs, acquire land, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.941758", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.454199", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace roofs; acquire land; and make health and safety improvements, shall the Roseland Elementary School District measure authorizing $9,400,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($539,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a board appointed citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3327, "fingerprint": "2020|202000681|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000681|SONOMA", "content_hash": "da8cb263aa646b47", "measure_id": "202000681", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; increase energy-efficiency by installing solar panels; make health and safety improvements; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Sebastopol Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $17,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1.0 million annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3976, "no_votes": 2054, "total_votes": 6030, "percent_yes": 65.93698175787728, "percent_no": 34.06301824212272, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Sebastopol Union School District to issue $17,500...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Sebastopol Union School District to issue $17,500,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including solar panel installation, health and safety upgrades, and modernization of classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $1.0 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.942103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.454400", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; increase energy-efficiency by installing solar panels; make health and safety improvements; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Sebastopol Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $17,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1.0 million annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3328, "fingerprint": "2020|202000682|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000682|SONOMA", "content_hash": "8bae94985fe7252c", "measure_id": "202000682", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; increase student safety by improving drop-off and pick-up areas; and modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall West Side Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $7,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $410,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 270, "no_votes": 165, "total_votes": 435, "percent_yes": 62.06896551724138, "percent_no": 37.93103448275862, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the West Side Union School District to issue $7", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the West Side Union School District to issue $7.5 million in bonds to replace HVAC systems, improve student drop-off and pick-up areas, and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.942413", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.454605", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; increase student safety by improving drop-off and pick-up areas; and modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall West Side Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $7,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $410,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3311, "fingerprint": "2020|202000074|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000074|SONOMA", "content_hash": "8ab848ffb4f259f3", "measure_id": "202000074", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve local fire prevention and protection by: installing emergency warning sirens and alerting systems; improving vegetation management to prevent the spread of wildfire; attracting and retaining qualified, local firefighters and emergency personnel; and, modernizing fire department equipment, facilities and stations, shall Sonoma County establish a \u00bd-cent sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $51,000,000 annually, with annual audits and citizen oversight, and increase its annual appropriations limit to allow expenditure of the proceeds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 118297, "no_votes": 64146, "total_votes": 182443, "percent_yes": 64.8405255340024, "percent_no": 35.159474465997604, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a half-cent sales tax in Sonoma County to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a half-cent sales tax in Sonoma County to fund fire prevention and protection services, including emergency warning systems, vegetation management, firefighter recruitment and retention, and modernized equipment and facilities. The tax would have generated approximately $51 million annually and remained in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.937148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.450782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local fire prevention and protection by: installing emergency warning sirens and alerting systems; improving vegetation management to prevent the spread of wildfire; attracting and retaining qualified, local firefighters and emergency personnel; and, modernizing fire department equipment, facilities and stations, shall Sonoma County establish a \u00bd-cent sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $51,000,000 annually, with annual audits and citizen oversight, and increase its annual appropriations limit to allow expenditure of the proceeds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3316, "fingerprint": "2020|202000414|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000414|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ff73db8470bbf35a", "measure_id": "202000414", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Healdsburg\u2019s Growth Management Ordinance be amended to permit the currently allowed average of 50 units per year of multi-family, income-restricted rental housing, as authorized by the voters in 2018, to be offered either for rental or for sale?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3209, "no_votes": 1494, "total_votes": 4703, "percent_yes": 68.23304273867744, "percent_no": 31.76695726132256, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends Healdsburg's Growth Management Ordinance to allow the curr...", "summary_text": "The measure amends Healdsburg's Growth Management Ordinance to allow the currently permitted 50 units per year of multi-family, income-restricted housing to be offered for either rental or sale, rather than rental only.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.938574", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.452164", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Healdsburg\u2019s Growth Management Ordinance be amended to permit the currently allowed average of 50 units per year of multi-family, income-restricted rental housing, as authorized by the voters in 2018, to be offered either for rental or for sale?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3332, "fingerprint": "2020|202000686|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000686|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a96868d872aa91c9", "measure_id": "202000686", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure quality education in local schools with stable local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Shoreline Unified School District\u2019s measure to enhance science, technology, engineering, and math programs; maintain art and music programs; provide specialized reading and writing programs; and attract and retain qualified teachers; be adopted, renewing the current $212 per parcel rate without any increase, raising $1,000,000 annually, for 8 years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight, and all funds benefiting local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1039, "no_votes": 376, "total_votes": 1415, "percent_yes": 73.42756183745584, "percent_no": 26.57243816254416, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an existing $212 annual parcel tax for Shoreline Unified ...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an existing $212 annual parcel tax for Shoreline Unified School District for 8 years to fund STEM programs, arts and music programs, specialized reading and writing programs, and teacher retention, generating approximately $1,000,000 annually. The measure includes senior exemptions and independent oversight provisions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.943845", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.455392", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure quality education in local schools with stable local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Shoreline Unified School District\u2019s measure to enhance science, technology, engineering, and math programs; maintain art and music programs; provide specialized reading and writing programs; and attract and retain qualified teachers; be adopted, renewing the current $212 per parcel rate without any increase, raising $1,000,000 annually, for 8 years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight, and all funds benefiting local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3330, "fingerprint": "2020|202000684|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000684|SONOMA", "content_hash": "1fe11e5f97832b6d", "measure_id": "202000684", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds offsetting state revenue cuts for support of quality academic programs (including reading, writing, math, science, technology, enrichment activities, art, music, and drama), retention of highly qualified teachers, and library and transportation services, shall the Fort Ross Elementary School District be authorized to levy $48 per parcel annually for eight years (approximately $34,000 annual funds raised), provide a senior citizens' exemption, and have funds stay local and not be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 276, "no_votes": 134, "total_votes": 410, "percent_yes": 67.31707317073172, "percent_no": 32.68292682926828, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes Fort Ross Elementary School District to levy a $48 ann...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes Fort Ross Elementary School District to levy a $48 annual parcel tax for eight years to fund academic programs, teacher retention, and library and transportation services. The tax includes a senior citizen exemption and is estimated to raise approximately $34,000 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.942960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.455003", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds offsetting state revenue cuts for support of quality academic programs (including reading, writing, math, science, technology, enrichment activities, art, music, and drama), retention of highly qualified teachers, and library and transportation services, shall the Fort Ross Elementary School District be authorized to levy $48 per parcel annually for eight years (approximately $34,000 annual funds raised), provide a senior citizens' exemption, and have funds stay local and not be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3331, "fingerprint": "2020|202000685|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000685|SONOMA", "content_hash": "7c16fc61dad7ad74", "measure_id": "202000685", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away, not increase the existing tax rate, protect academic programs in reading assistance, writing, math, art, science and music, retain qualified teachers, and maintain student counseling services, shall Sebastopol Union School District\u2019s measure levying $76.00 per parcel annually for eight years, be adopted, raising $331,000 annually, have no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, provide a senior citizens\u2019 exemption and have all funds stay local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5795, "no_votes": 1957, "total_votes": 7752, "percent_yes": 74.75490196078431, "percent_no": 25.24509803921569, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Sebastopol Union School District to levy a $76 annual...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Sebastopol Union School District to levy a $76 annual parcel tax for eight years to raise approximately $331,000 per year for academic programs, teacher retention, and student services, with exemptions for senior citizens and restrictions preventing funds from being used for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.943249", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.455193", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away, not increase the existing tax rate, protect academic programs in reading assistance, writing, math, art, science and music, retain qualified teachers, and maintain student counseling services, shall Sebastopol Union School District\u2019s measure levying $76.00 per parcel annually for eight years, be adopted, raising $331,000 annually, have no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, provide a senior citizens\u2019 exemption and have all funds stay local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3313, "fingerprint": "2020|202000075|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000075|SONOMA", "content_hash": "afb3598487d4e13c", "measure_id": "202000075", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide local mental health and addiction services and facilities for children, adults, veterans, seniors and those experiencing homelessness including: permanent supportive housing; crisis assessment; emergency psychiatric care; early detection and intervention; suicide prevention; and opioid and substance use prevention, treatment and recovery, shall the County of Sonoma establish a countywide \u00bc cent sales tax for ten years, providing approximately $25 million annually, with annual audits and citizen oversight to ensure funds are properly spent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 178309, "no_votes": 83659, "total_votes": 261968, "percent_yes": 68.06518353386673, "percent_no": 31.93481646613327, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a quarter-cent sales tax in Sonoma County for ten ye...", "summary_text": "This measure established a quarter-cent sales tax in Sonoma County for ten years to fund mental health and addiction services, including housing, crisis care, prevention programs, and treatment for various populations. The tax generates approximately $25 million annually with required audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.937726", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.451169", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide local mental health and addiction services and facilities for children, adults, veterans, seniors and those experiencing homelessness including: permanent supportive housing; crisis assessment; emergency psychiatric care; early detection and intervention; suicide prevention; and opioid and substance use prevention, treatment and recovery, shall the County of Sonoma establish a countywide \u00bc cent sales tax for ten years, providing approximately $25 million annually, with annual audits and citizen oversight to ensure funds are properly spent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3312, "fingerprint": "2020|202000076|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000076|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9cc660e569939248", "measure_id": "202000076", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to increase law enforcement transparency and accountability and to build the public trust in County government and the Sheriff\u2019s Office, shall Article XXVII of Title 2 of the Sonoma County Code be repealed and replaced by this measure to expand the oversight authority and independence of the Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach (IOLERO) to investigate Sheriff related issues, revise and expand the duties and powers of the Community Advisory Council, compel production of records and witnesses, and review IOLERO\u2019s performance of its duties?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 166483, "no_votes": 90689, "total_votes": 257172, "percent_yes": 64.73605213631343, "percent_no": 35.26394786368657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure repealed and replaced existing oversight rules to expand the pow...", "summary_text": "This measure repealed and replaced existing oversight rules to expand the powers and independence of Sonoma County's Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach (IOLERO), giving it broader authority to investigate Sheriff-related issues, compel production of records and witnesses, and revise the duties of the Community Advisory Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.937455", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.450977", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to increase law enforcement transparency and accountability and to build the public trust in County government and the Sheriff\u2019s Office, shall Article XXVII of Title 2 of the Sonoma County Code be repealed and replaced by this measure to expand the oversight authority and independence of the Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach (IOLERO) to investigate Sheriff related issues, revise and expand the duties and powers of the Community Advisory Council, compel production of records and witnesses, and review IOLERO\u2019s performance of its duties?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3321, "fingerprint": "2020|202000419|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000419|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9d5fb41041efd801", "measure_id": "202000419", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue locally controlled funding, that the state cannot take, and protect city services, including 911 emergency, paramedic and fire response; disaster, wildfire, and pandemic preparedness and response; keep city parks clean and safe; street/pothole repair; senior/youth programs; and other city services, shall Santa Rosa\u2019s measure consolidating and extending existing voter-approved sales taxes without change to the current \u00bd cent rate for ten years only, providing approximately $18 million dollars annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61163, "no_votes": 23970, "total_votes": 85133, "percent_yes": 71.84405577155745, "percent_no": 28.15594422844255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure consolidated and extended Santa Rosa's existing voter-approved s...", "summary_text": "This measure consolidated and extended Santa Rosa's existing voter-approved sales taxes at the current half-cent rate for ten years, generating approximately $18 million annually for city services including emergency response, fire protection, parks maintenance, street repairs, and senior/youth programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.940108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.453178", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue locally controlled funding, that the state cannot take, and protect city services, including 911 emergency, paramedic and fire response; disaster, wildfire, and pandemic preparedness and response; keep city parks clean and safe; street/pothole repair; senior/youth programs; and other city services, shall Santa Rosa\u2019s measure consolidating and extending existing voter-approved sales taxes without change to the current \u00bd cent rate for ten years only, providing approximately $18 million dollars annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3317, "fingerprint": "2020|202000415|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000415|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c9b7a15db4ff11fa", "measure_id": "202000415", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain important City services, including: repairing potholes/streets; installing City power backup systems for PG&E power shutdowns; preparing/responding to natural disasters/health emergencies; maintaining rapid 911 response; supporting youth/teen programs; and other City services; shall Cloverdale\u2019s measure extending the existing voter-approved Utility Users Tax at the current 3%, without increasing the rate, until ended by voters, providing $445,000 annually, exempting low-income seniors, requiring citizen oversight, with no money for Sacramento, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2420, "no_votes": 2109, "total_votes": 4529, "percent_yes": 53.43342901302716, "percent_no": 46.56657098697284, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Cloverdale's existing 3% Utility Users Tax indefinitely ...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Cloverdale's existing 3% Utility Users Tax indefinitely without increasing the rate, generating approximately $445,000 annually for city services while maintaining exemptions for low-income seniors and requiring citizen oversight. The tax was previously set to expire and needed voter approval to continue at the same rate.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.938876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.452371", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain important City services, including: repairing potholes/streets; installing City power backup systems for PG&E power shutdowns; preparing/responding to natural disasters/health emergencies; maintaining rapid 911 response; supporting youth/teen programs; and other City services; shall Cloverdale\u2019s measure extending the existing voter-approved Utility Users Tax at the current 3%, without increasing the rate, until ended by voters, providing $445,000 annually, exempting low-income seniors, requiring citizen oversight, with no money for Sacramento, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3318, "fingerprint": "2020|202000416|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000416|SONOMA", "content_hash": "83764a8878d82589", "measure_id": "202000416", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue funding that cannot be taken by the State, to maintain/prevent cuts to 911 emergency dispatch/local public safety; domestic violence response; emergency/natural disaster preparedness; streets/pothole repair; parks; and other city services, shall the measure to extend Cotati\u2019s existing, voter-approved 1\u00a2 sales tax be adopted until ended by voters, providing $2,200,000 annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight, audits, and no increase in tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3118, "no_votes": 1068, "total_votes": 4186, "percent_yes": 74.48638318203535, "percent_no": 25.513616817964646, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Cotati's existing 1-cent sales tax indefinitely until en...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Cotati's existing 1-cent sales tax indefinitely until ended by voters, generating approximately $2.2 million annually for city services including emergency dispatch, public safety, street maintenance, and parks. The measure maintains the current tax rate without increasing it and includes provisions for citizen oversight and audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.939149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.452575", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding that cannot be taken by the State, to maintain/prevent cuts to 911 emergency dispatch/local public safety; domestic violence response; emergency/natural disaster preparedness; streets/pothole repair; parks; and other city services, shall the measure to extend Cotati\u2019s existing, voter-approved 1\u00a2 sales tax be adopted until ended by voters, providing $2,200,000 annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight, audits, and no increase in tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3319, "fingerprint": "2020|202000417|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000417|SONOMA", "content_hash": "06b8969146a67ebd", "measure_id": "202000417", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To stabilize City finances, and maintain and protect essential City services, shall the City of Healdsburg adopt an ordinance to extend the one-half of one percent transactions and use tax, enacted by the voters in 2012 and currently in place until 2022 and generating approximately $2.1 million per year, with annual audits and review, and with all funds spent locally for the benefit of Healdsburg residents, until ended by voters?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3915, "no_votes": 2614, "total_votes": 6529, "percent_yes": 59.96324092510339, "percent_no": 40.03675907489661, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended Healdsburg's existing 0", "summary_text": "This measure extended Healdsburg's existing 0.5% sales tax beyond its 2022 expiration date, with the extension continuing until voters choose to end it. The tax generates approximately $2.1 million annually for general city services and requires annual audits and review.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.939419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.452777", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To stabilize City finances, and maintain and protect essential City services, shall the City of Healdsburg adopt an ordinance to extend the one-half of one percent transactions and use tax, enacted by the voters in 2012 and currently in place until 2022 and generating approximately $2.1 million per year, with annual audits and review, and with all funds spent locally for the benefit of Healdsburg residents, until ended by voters?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3320, "fingerprint": "2020|202000418|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000418|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9850bdde0e0e8b71", "measure_id": "202000418", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain emergency health/wildfire/natural disaster preparedness; rapid 911 emergency response; fire protection services/firefighting equipment; well-trained community police officers; streets/pothole repair; clean/safe public areas; support for local businesses/jobs; and other city services; shall the City of Petaluma adopt a measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax, providing approximately $13,500,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, citizen oversight, and all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20961, "no_votes": 13502, "total_votes": 34463, "percent_yes": 60.82175086324464, "percent_no": 39.17824913675536, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Petaluma to fund emergency ser...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Petaluma to fund emergency services, fire protection, police, street repairs, and other city services, generating approximately $13.5 million annually. The measure includes requirements for audits and citizen oversight, with the tax continuing until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.939797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.452977", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain emergency health/wildfire/natural disaster preparedness; rapid 911 emergency response; fire protection services/firefighting equipment; well-trained community police officers; streets/pothole repair; clean/safe public areas; support for local businesses/jobs; and other city services; shall the City of Petaluma adopt a measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax, providing approximately $13,500,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, citizen oversight, and all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3322, "fingerprint": "2020|202000420|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000420|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9e70787a6018763b", "measure_id": "202000420", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue funding general city services, including: emergency preparedness, infrastructure, street maintenance, parks, open space, community services, ambulance services, public safety, and supporting Sonoma\u2019s quality of life, shall the City of Sonoma (1) extend the existing voter approved sales tax of 0.50% (estimated $2,580,000 annually) on an ongoing basis until ended by voters, with no increase to the current rate, and (2) increase the City\u2019s annual appropriations limit by sales tax revenues for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4645, "no_votes": 2094, "total_votes": 6739, "percent_yes": 68.92714052530049, "percent_no": 31.072859474699513, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Sonoma's existing 0", "summary_text": "This measure extends Sonoma's existing 0.50% sales tax indefinitely to fund general city services including emergency preparedness, infrastructure, street maintenance, parks, ambulance services, and public safety, generating an estimated $2.58 million annually. It also increases the city's spending limit to accommodate the sales tax revenue for four years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.940423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.453382", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding general city services, including: emergency preparedness, infrastructure, street maintenance, parks, open space, community services, ambulance services, public safety, and supporting Sonoma\u2019s quality of life, shall the City of Sonoma (1) extend the existing voter approved sales tax of 0.50% (estimated $2,580,000 annually) on an ongoing basis until ended by voters, with no increase to the current rate, and (2) increase the City\u2019s annual appropriations limit by sales tax revenues for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3314, "fingerprint": "2020|202000421|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000421|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9e0f56b0fd508c08", "measure_id": "202000421", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue the existing protections provided by the current Urban Growth Boundary (\u201cUGB\u201d), such as preventing urban sprawl and preserving agricultural land and open space, shall the City of Sonoma extend its UGB until December 31, 2040, and, require that future changes to the UGB be approved by the voters except under limited circumstances requiring a 4/5ths vote of the Council?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5261, "no_votes": 1426, "total_votes": 6687, "percent_yes": 78.67504112457007, "percent_no": 21.324958875429928, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended Sonoma's Urban Growth Boundary until December 31, 2040,...", "summary_text": "This measure extended Sonoma's Urban Growth Boundary until December 31, 2040, which limits where urban development can occur to prevent sprawl and preserve agricultural land and open space. It also required future changes to the boundary to be approved by voters, except in limited circumstances where the City Council can approve changes with a four-fifths majority vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.937996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.451529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue the existing protections provided by the current Urban Growth Boundary (\u201cUGB\u201d), such as preventing urban sprawl and preserving agricultural land and open space, shall the City of Sonoma extend its UGB until December 31, 2040, and, require that future changes to the UGB be approved by the voters except under limited circumstances requiring a 4/5ths vote of the Council?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3323, "fingerprint": "2020|202000422|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000422|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ff00c3af47fec5e3", "measure_id": "202000422", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for general City services including, but not limited to, police, fire, roads, parks, and recreation, shall the City on an ongoing basis tax cannabis (marijuana) and hemp businesses at annual rates not to exceed 4% of gross receipts for all cannabis businesses, including, but not limited to, retail (estimated $200,000 annually all funds used locally), and increase the City\u2019s appropriations limit for Fiscal Years 2020/21-2023/24 by the amount of the tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5170, "no_votes": 1473, "total_votes": 6643, "percent_yes": 77.82628330573536, "percent_no": 22.17371669426464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of Sonoma to impose an annual tax on cannabi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of Sonoma to impose an annual tax on cannabis and hemp businesses at rates up to 4% of gross receipts, with estimated revenue of $200,000 annually to fund general city services including police, fire, roads, parks, and recreation. The measure also increases the city's appropriations limit through fiscal year 2023/24 to accommodate the additional tax revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.940786", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.453584", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for general City services including, but not limited to, police, fire, roads, parks, and recreation, shall the City on an ongoing basis tax cannabis (marijuana) and hemp businesses at annual rates not to exceed 4% of gross receipts for all cannabis businesses, including, but not limited to, retail (estimated $200,000 annually all funds used locally), and increase the City\u2019s appropriations limit for Fiscal Years 2020/21-2023/24 by the amount of the tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3315, "fingerprint": "2020|202000423|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000423|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ae58f5af2d3467a9", "measure_id": "202000423", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure amending the Municipal Code to permit personal cannabis cultivation on all residential properties and establishment and operation of cannabis businesses within the City, including commercial cultivation, manufacturing, retail, delivery, distribution, testing, and special events be adopted?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2896, "no_votes": 3753, "total_votes": 6649, "percent_yes": 43.55542186795006, "percent_no": 56.44457813204994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended Sonoma's Municipal Code to allow personal cann...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended Sonoma's Municipal Code to allow personal cannabis cultivation on all residential properties and permit various cannabis businesses including commercial cultivation, manufacturing, retail, delivery, distribution, testing, and special events within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.938271", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.451956", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure amending the Municipal Code to permit personal cannabis cultivation on all residential properties and establishment and operation of cannabis businesses within the City, including commercial cultivation, manufacturing, retail, delivery, distribution, testing, and special events be adopted?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3334, "fingerprint": "2020|202000425|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000425|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "961e05c7a0377a3f", "measure_id": "202000425", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to maintain fire, 9-1-1 emergency medical response, neighborhood safety, anti-gang/anti-drug programs; restore fire station staffing; address homelessness, vagrancy; keep public areas safe/clean; repair streets, potholes; retain small businesses, local jobs; and other general services by establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $11,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public disclosure of spending, all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16739, "no_votes": 12777, "total_votes": 29516, "percent_yes": 56.71161403984279, "percent_no": 43.28838596015721, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 0", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 0.75-cent sales tax in Stanislaus County to fund fire services, emergency medical response, public safety programs, street repairs, and other general municipal services, generating approximately $11 million annually. The tax continues indefinitely until ended by voters and requires public disclosure of spending with all funds used locally.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.945481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.455778", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to maintain fire, 9-1-1 emergency medical response, neighborhood safety, anti-gang/anti-drug programs; restore fire station staffing; address homelessness, vagrancy; keep public areas safe/clean; repair streets, potholes; retain small businesses, local jobs; and other general services by establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $11,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public disclosure of spending, all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3342, "fingerprint": "2020|202000693|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000693|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "535ed9ad4495c650", "measure_id": "202000693", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7565, "no_votes": 16879, "total_votes": 24444, "percent_yes": 30.94828996890852, "percent_no": 69.05171003109149, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to issue $228.4 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct classrooms and buildings for career and technical education programs across its campuses. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.949633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.457410", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3341, "fingerprint": "2020|202000692|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000692|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "05c14342b52a1d3e", "measure_id": "202000692", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/replace outdated plumbing, electrical wiring /leaking roofs; modernize/construct classrooms; and upgrade fire alarms/emergency communication systems; shall the measure to reauthorize as new bonds the $21.4 million of Stanislaus Union School District bonds (approved by voters in 2008) be adopted with legal rates, yearly average levies less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating an average $1.6 million dollars/year), annual audits, independent oversight and qualification for state matching funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3605, "no_votes": 3470, "total_votes": 7075, "percent_yes": 50.95406360424028, "percent_no": 49.04593639575972, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have reauthorized $21", "summary_text": "This measure would have reauthorized $21.4 million in bonds previously approved in 2008 for the Stanislaus Union School District to fund infrastructure repairs, classroom modernization, and safety system upgrades. The bonds would have been funded through property tax levies averaging less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.949206", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.457185", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/replace outdated plumbing, electrical wiring /leaking roofs; modernize/construct classrooms; and upgrade fire alarms/emergency communication systems; shall the measure to reauthorize as new bonds the $21.4 million of Stanislaus Union School District bonds (approved by voters in 2008) be adopted with legal rates, yearly average levies less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating an average $1.6 million dollars/year), annual audits, independent oversight and qualification for state matching funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3337, "fingerprint": "2020|202000688|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000688|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "add05fde4bf2a625", "measure_id": "202000688", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety/campus security; replace plumbing, wiring and roofs; provide handicapped access; qualify for state matching funds and renovate classrooms at Barrington, Bonita, Hunt and Von Renner Elementary, Foothill Community, Yolo Middle and Orestimba and West Side Valley High Schools, shall Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $35,000,000 in bonds be adopted with legal interest rates, payment averaging $1.85 million annually through maturity, projected tax levies below $0.06/$100 assessed valuation, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1174, "no_votes": 1282, "total_votes": 2456, "percent_yes": 47.80130293159609, "percent_no": 52.19869706840391, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Newman-Crows Landing Unified School Di...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District to issue $35 million in bonds to fund safety improvements, infrastructure repairs, handicapped access upgrades, and classroom renovations at eight schools in the district. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a projected rate below $0.06 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.946918", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.456377", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety/campus security; replace plumbing, wiring and roofs; provide handicapped access; qualify for state matching funds and renovate classrooms at Barrington, Bonita, Hunt and Von Renner Elementary, Foothill Community, Yolo Middle and Orestimba and West Side Valley High Schools, shall Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $35,000,000 in bonds be adopted with legal interest rates, payment averaging $1.85 million annually through maturity, projected tax levies below $0.06/$100 assessed valuation, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3339, "fingerprint": "2020|202000690|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000690|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "5746c7692b82ba46", "measure_id": "202000690", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize aging classrooms and facilities including leaking roofs and outdated plumbing, electrical wiring and heating/air conditioning systems at Dena Boer, Mildred Perkins, Salida and Sisk Elementary Schools and Salida Middle School, shall Salida Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $20,000,000 in bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $1.3 million per year until repaid, tax levies averaging less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1790, "no_votes": 2229, "total_votes": 4019, "percent_yes": 44.53844239860662, "percent_no": 55.46155760139338, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Salida Union School District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Salida Union School District to issue $20 million in bonds to repair and modernize facilities at five schools, including fixing roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, and HVAC. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies averaging less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.947884", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.456785", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize aging classrooms and facilities including leaking roofs and outdated plumbing, electrical wiring and heating/air conditioning systems at Dena Boer, Mildred Perkins, Salida and Sisk Elementary Schools and Salida Middle School, shall Salida Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $20,000,000 in bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $1.3 million per year until repaid, tax levies averaging less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3340, "fingerprint": "2020|202000691|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000691|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a9a383c376b380f7", "measure_id": "202000691", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety, campus security and classroom technology including upgraded fire alarms, emergency notification systems; renovate playgrounds and increased computer access at Dena Boer, Mildred Perkins, Salida and Sisk Elementary Schools and Salida Middle School, shall Salida Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $24,700,000 in bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $1.2 million per year until repaid, tax levies averaging less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1793, "no_votes": 2218, "total_votes": 4011, "percent_yes": 44.70206930939915, "percent_no": 55.29793069060085, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Salida Union School District to issue $24", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Salida Union School District to issue $24.7 million in bonds to fund safety improvements, technology upgrades, and playground renovations at five schools. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies averaging less than $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.948597", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.456986", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety, campus security and classroom technology including upgraded fire alarms, emergency notification systems; renovate playgrounds and increased computer access at Dena Boer, Mildred Perkins, Salida and Sisk Elementary Schools and Salida Middle School, shall Salida Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $24,700,000 in bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $1.2 million per year until repaid, tax levies averaging less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3338, "fingerprint": "2020|202000689|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000689|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "9328719c7088699f", "measure_id": "202000689", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To allow local high school teachers and staff members to live in the community in which they work and improve the school district\u2019s ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees by constructing teacher- staff rental housing, shall Patterson Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $32.5 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates raising approximately $2 million for annual repayment while bonds are outstanding, projected levies of less than $0.04 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1602, "no_votes": 2613, "total_votes": 4215, "percent_yes": 38.00711743772242, "percent_no": 61.99288256227758, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Patterson Joint Unified School Distric...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Patterson Joint Unified School District to issue $32.5 million in bonds to construct rental housing for teachers and staff. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax increases of less than $0.04 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.947420", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.456582", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To allow local high school teachers and staff members to live in the community in which they work and improve the school district\u2019s ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees by constructing teacher- staff rental housing, shall Patterson Joint Unified School District measure authorizing $32.5 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates raising approximately $2 million for annual repayment while bonds are outstanding, projected levies of less than $0.04 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3336, "fingerprint": "2020|202000687|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000687|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "ac9e1eabb950cc56", "measure_id": "202000687", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and classroom learning environments, make safety and security upgrades, replace outdated portable classrooms with new construction, modernize restrooms, and qualify for matching grants, shall Chatom Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted to authorize the issuance of $10,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with estimated repayment averaging $698,000 annually through maturity, projected levies of $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation, no money for administrator salaries, annual audits, and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 448, "no_votes": 471, "total_votes": 919, "percent_yes": 48.74863982589771, "percent_no": 51.25136017410229, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Chatom Union School District to issue $10", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Chatom Union School District to issue $10.7 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including safety upgrades, replacing portable classrooms, and modernizing restrooms. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies estimated at $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.946341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.456175", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and classroom learning environments, make safety and security upgrades, replace outdated portable classrooms with new construction, modernize restrooms, and qualify for matching grants, shall Chatom Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted to authorize the issuance of $10,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with estimated repayment averaging $698,000 annually through maturity, projected levies of $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation, no money for administrator salaries, annual audits, and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3335, "fingerprint": "2020|202000426|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000426|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "b217a84161eba0b4", "measure_id": "202000426", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Waterford amend Municipal Code Title 5, entitled \"Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations,\" by adding Chapter 5.50, entitled \"Cannabis Business Tax\", allowing the City Council, by resolution, to set the business license tax rule for every person engaged in a cannabis business in an amount up to, but not to exceed, .15\u00a2 for each $1.00 of gross receipts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1846, "no_votes": 1302, "total_votes": 3148, "percent_yes": 58.64040660736976, "percent_no": 41.35959339263024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends Waterford's Municipal Code to allow the City Council to im...", "summary_text": "The measure amends Waterford's Municipal Code to allow the City Council to impose a business license tax on cannabis businesses of up to 15 cents per dollar of gross receipts. It creates a new chapter in the city's business tax regulations specifically governing taxation of cannabis operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.945906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.455975", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Waterford amend Municipal Code Title 5, entitled \"Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations,\" by adding Chapter 5.50, entitled \"Cannabis Business Tax\", allowing the City Council, by resolution, to set the business license tax rule for every person engaged in a cannabis business in an amount up to, but not to exceed, .15\u00a2 for each $1.00 of gross receipts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3346, "fingerprint": "2020|202000697|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000697|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "5d3c30ce33ef45f0", "measure_id": "202000697", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing estimated tax rates, shall Waterford Unified School District's measure to retrofit and renovate classrooms including vocational education; enhance student safety/school security; increase access to internet/technology; and upgrade emergency preparedness at Richard M. Moon Primary, Waterford Junior, Lucille Whitehead Intermediate, and Sentinel and Waterford High be adopted, authorizing $5,350,000 in bonds, extending but not increasing current rates by $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation until repaid, raising $370,000/ year for bond repayment with legal rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2081, "no_votes": 1705, "total_votes": 3786, "percent_yes": 54.96566296883254, "percent_no": 45.03433703116746, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized $5,350,000 in bonds for Waterford Unified ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized $5,350,000 in bonds for Waterford Unified School District to retrofit classrooms, enhance safety and security, upgrade technology access, and improve emergency preparedness across five schools. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $370,000 annually until repaid.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.951557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.458194", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing estimated tax rates, shall Waterford Unified School District's measure to retrofit and renovate classrooms including vocational education; enhance student safety/school security; increase access to internet/technology; and upgrade emergency preparedness at Richard M. Moon Primary, Waterford Junior, Lucille Whitehead Intermediate, and Sentinel and Waterford High be adopted, authorizing $5,350,000 in bonds, extending but not increasing current rates by $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation until repaid, raising $370,000/ year for bond repayment with legal rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3344, "fingerprint": "2020|202000695|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000695|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "ea12ef55875cf493", "measure_id": "202000695", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retrofit and renovate classrooms at Dena Boer, Mildred Perkins, Salida and Sisk Elementary Schools and Salida Middle School; increase student internet and computer technology access; upgrade emergency communication/ preparedness and fire alarm systems; improve campus security /student safety; repair roofs and create local construction jobs, shall Salida Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $9.24 million in bonds be adopted with payments averaging less than 2\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation (raising an average $644,000/ year until repaid), legal rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4700, "no_votes": 3664, "total_votes": 8364, "percent_yes": 56.19320899091343, "percent_no": 43.80679100908657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Salida Union School District to issue $9", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Salida Union School District to issue $9.24 million in bonds to retrofit classrooms, upgrade technology and safety systems, and make facility improvements at five schools. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments averaging less than 2 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.950694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.457793", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retrofit and renovate classrooms at Dena Boer, Mildred Perkins, Salida and Sisk Elementary Schools and Salida Middle School; increase student internet and computer technology access; upgrade emergency communication/ preparedness and fire alarm systems; improve campus security /student safety; repair roofs and create local construction jobs, shall Salida Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $9.24 million in bonds be adopted with payments averaging less than 2\u00a2 per $100 assessed valuation (raising an average $644,000/ year until repaid), legal rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3333, "fingerprint": "2020|202000424|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000424|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "202000424", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1777, "no_votes": 1378, "total_votes": 3155, "percent_yes": 56.32329635499208, "percent_no": 43.67670364500792, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.944785", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.455589", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3343, "fingerprint": "2020|202000694|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000694|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "2659e17c31b9869e", "measure_id": "202000694", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "With no increase in estimated tax rates, shall Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District's measure to expand vocational education classrooms; increase student internet/technology access; retrofit/construct classrooms/P.E. facilities; upgrade school security/student safety/emergency preparedness; be adopted, authorizing $25.82 million in bonds, extending but not increasing current rates (averaging less than $48/$100,000 assessed valuation) until repaid, raising average $1.8 million/year, with legal interest rates, annual audits, independent oversight and qualifying for State reimbursement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3060, "no_votes": 2046, "total_votes": 5106, "percent_yes": 59.929494712103406, "percent_no": 40.070505287896594, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District to issue $25.82 million in bonds to fund vocational education classrooms, technology access, facility construction and retrofits, and security upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at existing rates averaging less than $48 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.950209", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.457603", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "With no increase in estimated tax rates, shall Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District's measure to expand vocational education classrooms; increase student internet/technology access; retrofit/construct classrooms/P.E. facilities; upgrade school security/student safety/emergency preparedness; be adopted, authorizing $25.82 million in bonds, extending but not increasing current rates (averaging less than $48/$100,000 assessed valuation) until repaid, raising average $1.8 million/year, with legal interest rates, annual audits, independent oversight and qualifying for State reimbursement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3345, "fingerprint": "2020|202000696|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000696|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "3ecbd72e10e7eb00", "measure_id": "202000696", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "With no increase in total approved debt, shall Stanislaus Union School District's measure to retrofit/ construct classrooms; increase student internet/ technology access; improve school security/ student safety; upgrade emergency communication systems; and create local construction jobs be adopted, allowing immediate access to $21.4 million of previously approved bonds through issuance of new bonds with annual payments less than 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation (generating $1.6 million dollars/ year until repaid), legal rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7753, "no_votes": 4897, "total_votes": 12650, "percent_yes": 61.28853754940712, "percent_no": 38.71146245059288, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows Stanislaus Union School District to issue $21", "summary_text": "This measure allows Stanislaus Union School District to issue $21.4 million in bonds from previously approved debt authorization to fund classroom construction/retrofits, technology improvements, security upgrades, and emergency communication systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of less than 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $1.6 million annually until repaid.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.951134", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.457993", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "With no increase in total approved debt, shall Stanislaus Union School District's measure to retrofit/ construct classrooms; increase student internet/ technology access; improve school security/ student safety; upgrade emergency communication systems; and create local construction jobs be adopted, allowing immediate access to $21.4 million of previously approved bonds through issuance of new bonds with annual payments less than 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation (generating $1.6 million dollars/ year until repaid), legal rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3347, "fingerprint": "2020|202000698|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000698|SUTTER", "content_hash": "9a99089cf85bce5f", "measure_id": "202000698", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "With no increase in estimated tax rates, shall Woodland Joint Unified School District's measure to expand vocational education facilities for programs including automotive engineering/construction trades; improve classroom technology/internet access; repair classrooms/schools; and replace roofs, HVAC, wiring and plumbing be adopted, authorizing $44.205 million of bonds, extending current levies (averaging less than $24/$1 00,000/year of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding), raising on average $3.23 million/year, with legal interest rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 61, "percent_yes": 55.73770491803278, "percent_no": 44.26229508196722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Woodland Joint Unified School District to issue $44", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Woodland Joint Unified School District to issue $44.205 million in bonds to expand vocational education facilities, improve classroom technology and internet access, repair schools, and replace infrastructure like roofs and HVAC systems. The bonds would be funded by extending current property tax levies at an estimated rate of less than $24 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds are outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.952029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.458391", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "With no increase in estimated tax rates, shall Woodland Joint Unified School District's measure to expand vocational education facilities for programs including automotive engineering/construction trades; improve classroom technology/internet access; repair classrooms/schools; and replace roofs, HVAC, wiring and plumbing be adopted, authorizing $44.205 million of bonds, extending current levies (averaging less than $24/$1 00,000/year of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding), raising on average $3.23 million/year, with legal interest rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10936, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_25|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_25|Statewide", "content_hash": "d2f8f5c0eec8cb68", "measure_id": "PROP_25", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 25, Replace Cash Bail with Risk Assessments Referendum (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[18] \u201c Referendum on Law that Replaced Money Bail with System Based on Public Safety and Flight Risk.[19] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[18]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7232380, "no_votes": 9358226, "total_votes": 16590606, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_25,_Replace_Cash_Bail_with_Risk_Assessments_Referendum_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[18]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[18] \u201c A \u201cYes\u201d vote approves, and a \u201cNo\u201d vote rejects, a 2018 law that: Replaced the money bail system (for obtaining release from jail before trial) with a system based on a determination of public safety and flight risk. Limits detention of a person in jail before trial for most misdemeanors.[19] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:13.256736", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:13.256736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:13.256736", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 25, Replace Cash Bail with Risk Assessments Referendum (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_25_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2025%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2025%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10935, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_24|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_24|Statewide", "content_hash": "067891cb22b00235", "measure_id": "PROP_24", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 24, Consumer Personal Information Law and Agency Initiative (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[7] \u201c Amends Consumer Privacy Laws. Initiative Statute.[8] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[7]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9384625, "no_votes": 7305431, "total_votes": 16690056, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24,_Consumer_Personal_Information_Law_and_Agency_Initiative_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[7]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[7] \u201c Permits consumers to: (1) prevent businesses from sharing personal information; (2) correct inaccurate personal information; and (3) limit businesses\u2019 use of \u201csensitive personal information\u201d\u2014including precise geolocation; race; ethnicity; religion; genetic data; private communications; sexual orientation; and specified health information. Establishes California Privacy Protection Agency to additionally enforce and implement consumer privacy laws and impose fines. Changes criteria for which businesses must comply with laws. Prohibits businesses\u2019 retention of personal information for longer than reasonably necessary. Triples maximum penalties for violations concerning consumers under age 16. Authorizes civil penalties for theft of consumer login information, as specified.[8] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:12.141339", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:12.141339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:12.141339", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 24, Consumer Personal Information Law and Agency Initiative (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10934, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_23|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_23|Statewide", "content_hash": "62acae06b2e4548e", "measure_id": "PROP_23", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 23, Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[5] \u201c Establishes State Requirements for Kidney Dialysis Clinics. Requires On-Site Medical Professional. Initiative Statute.[6] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[5]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6161457, "no_votes": 10681171, "total_votes": 16842628, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23,_Dialysis_Clinic_Requirements_Initiative_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[5]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[5] \u201c Requires at least one licensed physician on site during treatment at outpatient kidney dialysis clinics; authorizes California Department of Public Health to exempt clinics from this requirement if there is a shortage of qualified licensed physicians and the clinic has at least one nurse practitioner or physician assistant on site. Requires clinics to report dialysis-related infection data to state and federal governments. Prohibits clinics from closing or reducing services without state approval. Prohibits clinics from refusing to treat patients based on the source of payment for care.[6] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:11.079499", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:11.079499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:11.079499", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 23, Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 10933, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_22|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_22|Statewide", "content_hash": "5b450df60e5f1c9e", "measure_id": "PROP_22", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 22, App-Based Drivers as Contractors and Labor Policies Initiative (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[32] \u201c Exempts App-Based Transportation and Delivery Companies from Providing Employee Benefits to Certain Drivers. Initiative Statute.[33] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[32]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9958425, "no_votes": 7027820, "total_votes": 16986245, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22,_App-Based_Drivers_as_Contractors_and_Labor_Policies_Initiative_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[32]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[32] \u201c Classifies drivers for app-based transportation (rideshare) and delivery companies as \u201cindependent contractors,\u201d not \u201cemployees,\u201d unless company: sets drivers\u2019 hours, requires acceptance of specific ride and delivery requests, or restricts working for other companies. Independent contractors are not covered by various state employment laws\u2014including minimum wage, overtime, unemployment insurance, and workers\u2019 compensation. Instead, independent-contractor drivers would be entitled to other compensation\u2014including minimum earnings, healthcare subsidies, and vehicle insurance. Restricts certain local regulation of app-based drivers. Criminalizes impersonation of drivers.[33] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:09.956217", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:09.956217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:09.956217", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 22, App-Based Drivers as Contractors and Labor Policies Initiative (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 10932, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_21|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_21|Statewide", "content_hash": "024f7dc96a37ef7e", "measure_id": "PROP_21", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 21, Local Rent Control Initiative (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[6] \u201c Expands Local Governments\u2019 Authority to Enact Rent Control on Residential Property. Initiative Statute.[7] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[6]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6771298, "no_votes": 10095206, "total_votes": 16866504, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21,_Local_Rent_Control_Initiative_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[6]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[6] \u201c Amends state law to allow local governments to establish rent control on residential properties over 15 years old. Allows local limits on annual rent increases to differ from current statewide limit. Allows rent increases in rent-controlled properties of up to 15 percent over three years at start of new tenancy (above any increase allowed by local ordinance). Exempts individuals who own no more than two homes from new rent-control policies. In accordance with California law, prohibits rent control from violating landlords\u2019 right to fair financial return.[7] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:08.762171", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:08.762171", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:08.762171", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 21, Local Rent Control Initiative (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10931, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_20|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_20|Statewide", "content_hash": "0c2e7b15f45e11bd", "measure_id": "PROP_20", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 20, Criminal Sentencing, Parole, and DNA Collection Initiative (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[9] \u201c Restricts Parole for Non-Violent Offenders. Authorizes Felony Sentences for Certain Offenses Currently Treated Only as Misdemeanors. Initiative Statute.[10] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[9]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6385839, "no_votes": 10294058, "total_votes": 16679897, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20,_Criminal_Sentencing,_Parole,_and_DNA_Collection_Initiative_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[9]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[9] \u201c Limits access to parole programs established for non-violent offenders who have completed the full term of their primary offense by eliminating eligibility for certain offenses. Changes standards and requirements governing parole decisions under this program. Authorizes felony charges for specified theft crimes currently chargeable only as misdemeanors, including some theft crimes where the value is between $250 and $950. Requires persons convicted of specified misdemeanors to submit to collection of DNA samples for state database.[10] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:07.593779", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:07.593779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:07.593779", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 20, Criminal Sentencing, Parole, and DNA Collection Initiative (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10930, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_19|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_19|Statewide", "content_hash": "5dfa47fcc9b5c79c", "measure_id": "PROP_19", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 19, Property Tax Transfers, Exemptions, and Revenue for Wildfire Agencies and Counties Amendment (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[2] \u201c Changes Certain Property Tax Rules. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.[3] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[2]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8545818, "no_votes": 8176105, "total_votes": 16721923, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19,_Property_Tax_Transfers,_Exemptions,_and_Revenue_for_Wildfire_Agencies_and_Counties_Amendment_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[2]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[2] \u201c Permits homeowners who are over 55, severely disabled, or whose homes were destroyed by wildfire or disaster, to transfer their primary residence\u2019s property tax base value to a replacement residence of any value, anywhere in the state. Limits tax benefits for certain transfers of real property between family members. Expands tax benefits for transfers of family farms. Allocates most resulting state revenues and savings (if any) to fire protection services and reimbursing local governments for taxation-related changes.[3] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:06.186299", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:06.186299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:06.186299", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 19, Property Tax Transfers, Exemptions, and Revenue for Wildfire Agencies and Counties Amendment (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10929, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_18|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_18|Statewide", "content_hash": "e7d10d7d462c5378", "measure_id": "PROP_18", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 18, Primary Voting for 17-Year-Olds Amendment (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[3] \u201c Amends California Constitution to Permit 17-Year-Olds to Vote in Primary and Special Elections if They Will Turn 18 by the Next General Election and be Otherwise Eligible to Vote. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.[4] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[3]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7514317, "no_votes": 9577807, "total_votes": 17092124, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18,_Primary_Voting_for_17-Year-Olds_Amendment_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[3]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[3] \u201c The California Constitution currently permits individuals who are at least 18 years old on the date of an election to vote in that election. Amends constitution to permit 17-year-olds who will be at least 18 years old and otherwise eligible to vote at the time of the next general election to vote in any primary or special election that occurs before the next general election.[4] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:04.662526", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:04.662526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:04.662526", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 18, Primary Voting for 17-Year-Olds Amendment (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10928, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_17|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_17|Statewide", "content_hash": "c69979abc0e97a9e", "measure_id": "PROP_17", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 17, Voting Rights Restoration for Persons on Parole Amendment (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[2] \u201c Restores Right to Vote After Completion of Prison Term. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.[3] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[2]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9985568, "no_votes": 7069173, "total_votes": 17054741, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17,_Voting_Rights_Restoration_for_Persons_on_Parole_Amendment_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[2]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[2] \u201c Amends state constitution to restore voting rights to persons who have been disqualified from voting while serving a prison term as soon as they complete their prison term.[3] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:03.363007", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:03.363007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:03.363007", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 17, Voting Rights Restoration for Persons on Parole Amendment (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10927, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_16|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_16|Statewide", "content_hash": "ccff0e283cdb3c2b", "measure_id": "PROP_16", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 16, Repeal Proposition 209 Affirmative Action Amendment (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[15] \u201c Allow Diversity as a Factor in Public Employment, Education, and Contracting Decisions. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.[16] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[15]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7217064, "no_votes": 9655595, "total_votes": 16872659, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16,_Repeal_Proposition_209_Affirmative_Action_Amendment_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[15]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[15] \u201c Permits government decision-making policies to consider race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin to address diversity by repealing article I, section 31, of the California Constitution, which was added by Proposition 209 in 1996. Proposition 209 generally prohibits state and local governments from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, individuals or groups on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, education, or contracting. Does not alter other state and federal laws guaranteeing equal protection and prohibiting unlawful discrimination.[16] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:01.544032", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:01.544032", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:01.544032", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 16, Repeal Proposition 209 Affirmative Action Amendment (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10926, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_15|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_15|Statewide", "content_hash": "199205373cb7cd99", "measure_id": "PROP_15", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 15, Tax on Commercial and Industrial Properties for Education and Local Government Funding Initiative (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[3] \u201c Increases Funding for Public Schools, Community Colleges, and Local Government Services by Changing Tax Assessment of Commercial and Industrial Property. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.[4] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[3]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8213054, "no_votes": 8885569, "total_votes": 17098623, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15,_Tax_on_Commercial_and_Industrial_Properties_for_Education_and_Local_Government_Funding_Initiative_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[3]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[3] \u201c Increases funding for K-12 public schools, community colleges, and local governments by requiring that commercial and industrial real property be taxed based on current market value, instead of purchase price. Exempts from taxation changes: residential properties; agricultural land; and owners of commercial and industrial properties with combined value of $3 million or less. Any additional educational funding will supplement existing school funding guarantees. Exempts small businesses from personal property tax; for other businesses, provides $500,000 exemption.[4] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:00.796005", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:00.796005", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:51:00.796005", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 15, Tax on Commercial and Industrial Properties for Education and Local Government Funding Initiative (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10925, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_14|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_14|Statewide", "content_hash": "d5f040970dccf7cd", "measure_id": "PROP_14", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 14, Stem Cell Research Institute Bond Initiative (2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[4] \u201c Authorizes Bonds Continuing Stem Cell Research. Initiative Statute.[5] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[4]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8588618, "no_votes": 8222154, "total_votes": 16810772, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14,_Stem_Cell_Research_Institute_Bond_Initiative_(2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[4]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[4] \u201c Authorizes $5.5 billion in state general obligation bonds to fund grants from the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine to educational, non-profit, and private entities for: stem cell and other medical research, including training; stem cell therapy development and delivery; research facility construction; and associated administrative expenses. Dedicates $1.5 billion to research and therapy for Alzheimer\u2019s, Parkinson\u2019s, stroke, epilepsy, and other brain and central nervous system diseases and conditions. Appropriates General Fund moneys to pay bond debt service. Expands programs promoting stem cell and other medical research, therapy development and delivery, and student and physician training and fellowships.[5] \u201d", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:50:58.863396", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:50:58.863396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:50:58.863396", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 14, Stem Cell Research Institute Bond Initiative (2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10924, "fingerprint": "2020|PROP_13|Statewide|Ballotpedia", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|PROP_13|Statewide", "content_hash": "590c1116924445f8", "measure_id": "PROP_13", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Proposition 13, School and College Facilities Bond (March 2020)", "description": null, "ballot_question": "The ballot title was as follows:[6] \u201c Authorizes Bonds for Facility Repair, Construction, and Modernization at Public Preschools, K\u201312 Schools, Community Colleges, and Universities. Legislative Statute.[8] \u201d The ballot summary was as follows:[6]", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4304013, "no_votes": 4856154, "total_votes": 9160167, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": null, "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "Ballotpedia", "source_url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13,_School_and_College_Facilities_Bond_(March_2020)", "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ballot title was as follows:[6]", "summary_text": "The ballot summary was as follows:[6] \u201c Authorizes $15 billion in state general obligation bonds for public education facilities: $9 billion for preschools and K\u201312 (includes $5.2 billion for modernization, $2.8 billion for new construction, $500 million for charter schools, and $500 million for career technical education); $6 billion for public universities and community colleges. Projects will improve facilities' health/safety conditions (including earthquake/fire safety and removing lead from water) and increase affordable student housing. Limits administrative costs to 5%. Appropriates money from General Fund to repay bonds.[8] \u201d", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": "2020-03-05T00:00:00", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:50:57.823333", "updated_at": "2026-04-12T10:50:57.823333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T10:50:57.823333", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Proposition 13, School and College Facilities Bond (March 2020)", "source": "Ballotpedia", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(2020)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2020/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2020", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%202020", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%202020", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 3349, "fingerprint": "2020|202000699|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000699|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "c6d3d8eb221ea392", "measure_id": "202000699", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance student safety and security, reconfigure student drop-off areas, replace outdated portables with modern permanent classrooms and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Gerber Union Elementary School District issue up to $4,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average of $220,045 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 2.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 310, "no_votes": 484, "total_votes": 794, "percent_yes": 39.042821158690174, "percent_no": 60.957178841309826, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Gerber Union Elementary School District...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Gerber Union Elementary School District to issue up to $4,000,000 in bonds to fund safety improvements, reconfigure drop-off areas, replace portable classrooms with permanent ones, and provide matching funds for state grants. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 2.7 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.952931", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.458785", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance student safety and security, reconfigure student drop-off areas, replace outdated portables with modern permanent classrooms and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Gerber Union Elementary School District issue up to $4,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average of $220,045 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 2.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3350, "fingerprint": "2020|202000700|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000700|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "24d1f8d47f436b76", "measure_id": "202000700", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and renovate classrooms and buildings; make campus security and safety improvements; install air conditioning units; and improve access for students with disabilities, shall the Lassen View Union Elementary School District measure authorizing $2,700,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, be adopted, levying approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($186,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 421, "no_votes": 568, "total_votes": 989, "percent_yes": 42.56825075834176, "percent_no": 57.43174924165824, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Lassen View Union Elementary School Di...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Lassen View Union Elementary School District to issue $2.7 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom renovations, security upgrades, air conditioning installation, and disability access improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.953348", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.458981", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and renovate classrooms and buildings; make campus security and safety improvements; install air conditioning units; and improve access for students with disabilities, shall the Lassen View Union Elementary School District measure authorizing $2,700,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, be adopted, levying approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation ($186,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with a board appointed citizens' oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3348, "fingerprint": "2020|202000077|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000077|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "bfabfe6184988aa5", "measure_id": "202000077", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the County of Tehama to collect a one percent sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for a period of ten years, providing approximately $7,900,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2916, "no_votes": 15123, "total_votes": 18039, "percent_yes": 16.16497588558124, "percent_no": 83.83502411441876, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Tehama County to impose a 1% sales tax for...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Tehama County to impose a 1% sales tax for ten years, generating approximately $7.9 million annually for general county operations and services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.952498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.458586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the County of Tehama to collect a one percent sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for a period of ten years, providing approximately $7,900,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3355, "fingerprint": "2020|202000078|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000078|TRINITY", "content_hash": "a76a506a1f66b7b9", "measure_id": "202000078", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Ordinance establishing a cannabis cultivation tax of $0.85 per square foot for 2500 square feet or less of licensed outdoor/mixed canopy area, and $1.45 per square foot for 2501 square feet or greater of licensed outdoor/mixed canopy area; and a gross proceeds tax of (7%) on the manufacturing of cultivated cannabis; and a gross proceeds tax of (7%) on medicinal or legal cannabis storefronts and collectives for general governmental purposes be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2384, "no_votes": 2391, "total_votes": 4775, "percent_yes": 49.92670157068062, "percent_no": 50.07329842931938, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a cannabis cultivation tax of $0", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a cannabis cultivation tax of $0.85 per square foot for smaller operations (2,500 square feet or less) and $1.45 per square foot for larger operations, plus a 7% gross proceeds tax on cannabis manufacturing and retail sales. The tax revenue would have supported general governmental purposes in Trinity County.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.955809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.459963", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance establishing a cannabis cultivation tax of $0.85 per square foot for 2500 square feet or less of licensed outdoor/mixed canopy area, and $1.45 per square foot for 2501 square feet or greater of licensed outdoor/mixed canopy area; and a gross proceeds tax of (7%) on the manufacturing of cultivated cannabis; and a gross proceeds tax of (7%) on medicinal or legal cannabis storefronts and collectives for general governmental purposes be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3353, "fingerprint": "2020|202000079|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000079|TRINITY", "content_hash": "ecd392d7d61f3bed", "measure_id": "202000079", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on September 17, 2019 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Trinity ordering the formation of the \u201cTrinity Life Support Community Services District\u201d in the territory described, known as \u2018lands currently served by Trinity County Life Support,\u2019 subject to terms and conditions specified in the order, be approved. Such terms and conditions, including a requirement that a board of directors be elected at-large, that the assessment be approved as a condition of formation, that the district will be authorized to provide advance life support ambulance services, including related community out-reach, training and educational programs, and other more particularly described in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2603, "no_votes": 1496, "total_votes": 4099, "percent_yes": 63.50329348621615, "percent_no": 36.49670651378385, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would approve the formation of the Trinity Life Support Communit...", "summary_text": "This measure would approve the formation of the Trinity Life Support Community Services District to provide advanced life support ambulance services, community outreach, training and educational programs in the area currently served by Trinity County Life Support. The district would be governed by an at-large elected board of directors and funded through assessments that must be approved as a condition of formation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.954771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.459568", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on September 17, 2019 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Trinity ordering the formation of the \u201cTrinity Life Support Community Services District\u201d in the territory described, known as \u2018lands currently served by Trinity County Life Support,\u2019 subject to terms and conditions specified in the order, be approved. Such terms and conditions, including a requirement that a board of directors be elected at-large, that the assessment be approved as a condition of formation, that the district will be authorized to provide advance life support ambulance services, including related community out-reach, training and educational programs, and other more particularly described in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3357, "fingerprint": "2020|202000701|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000701|TRINITY", "content_hash": "04ca4075328ee430", "measure_id": "202000701", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate/modernize aging school facilities, upgrade inefficient electrical/mechanical/plumbing systems and classrooms to modern standards; upgrade health/safety/security systems; remove mold/asbestos; and qualify the District for State grants, shall the measure authorizing the Trinity Alps Unified School District to issue $16,670,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy an estimated six cents/$100 of assessed value ($1,048,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, and no money for salaries, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1541, "no_votes": 1955, "total_votes": 3496, "percent_yes": 44.07894736842105, "percent_no": 55.92105263157895, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Trinity Alps Unified School District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Trinity Alps Unified School District to issue $16.67 million in bonds to renovate school facilities, upgrade building systems, and improve health and safety conditions. The bonds would have been funded through an estimated six cents per $100 of assessed property value while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.956825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.460350", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate/modernize aging school facilities, upgrade inefficient electrical/mechanical/plumbing systems and classrooms to modern standards; upgrade health/safety/security systems; remove mold/asbestos; and qualify the District for State grants, shall the measure authorizing the Trinity Alps Unified School District to issue $16,670,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy an estimated six cents/$100 of assessed value ($1,048,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, and no money for salaries, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3356, "fingerprint": "2020|202000080|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000080|TRINITY", "content_hash": "675b86e6f8e0daed", "measure_id": "202000080", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance establishing a Cannabis cultivation tax of $15.44/lb for flowers, $4.59/lb for leaves, $2.16/lb for fresh plants and tax of 2.5% of gross sales by the holder of a Cannabis retail license be established? For Cannabis cultivation, the first 100 pounds shall be taxed at no more than 25% of the full rate, 100 pounds through 400 pounds shall be taxed at no more than 50% of the full rate, 400 pounds through 1,000 pounds shall be taxed at no more than 75% of the full rate and more than 1,000 pounds shall be taxed at full rate.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4293, "no_votes": 1801, "total_votes": 6094, "percent_yes": 70.44634066294716, "percent_no": 29.553659337052835, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a cannabis tax system with rates of $15", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a cannabis tax system with rates of $15.44 per pound for flowers, $4.59 per pound for leaves, $2.16 per pound for fresh plants, and 2.5% of gross sales for retail operations. The cultivation tax uses a tiered structure with reduced rates for smaller producers, starting at 25% of the full rate for the first 100 pounds and scaling up to the full rate for production over 1,000 pounds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.956325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.460153", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance establishing a Cannabis cultivation tax of $15.44/lb for flowers, $4.59/lb for leaves, $2.16/lb for fresh plants and tax of 2.5% of gross sales by the holder of a Cannabis retail license be established? For Cannabis cultivation, the first 100 pounds shall be taxed at no more than 25% of the full rate, 100 pounds through 400 pounds shall be taxed at no more than 50% of the full rate, 400 pounds through 1,000 pounds shall be taxed at no more than 75% of the full rate and more than 1,000 pounds shall be taxed at full rate.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3354, "fingerprint": "2020|202000081|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000081|TRINITY", "content_hash": "c947331e1ddb820c", "measure_id": "202000081", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To prevent cuts or elimination of local life-support ambulance service, including two 24/7 ambulances staffed for emergencies stationed in Weaverville and Hayfork, shall the order adopted on June 16, 2020 by the Trinity Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the formation of the \"Trinity Life Support Community Services District\" in the territory described, subject to terms specified in the order, including a special tax to finance district services, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4044, "no_votes": 1281, "total_votes": 5325, "percent_yes": 75.94366197183099, "percent_no": 24.05633802816901, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure approved the formation of the Trinity Life Support Community Ser...", "summary_text": "This measure approved the formation of the Trinity Life Support Community Services District to maintain local ambulance service, including two 24/7 ambulances stationed in Weaverville and Hayfork, funded by a special tax.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.955189", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.459768", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent cuts or elimination of local life-support ambulance service, including two 24/7 ambulances staffed for emergencies stationed in Weaverville and Hayfork, shall the order adopted on June 16, 2020 by the Trinity Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the formation of the \"Trinity Life Support Community Services District\" in the territory described, subject to terms specified in the order, including a special tax to finance district services, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3351, "fingerprint": "2020|202000082|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000082|TRINITY", "content_hash": "2777778bbbf6eec7", "measure_id": "202000082", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To prevent cuts or elimination of local life-support ambulance service, including two 24/7 ambulances staffed for emergencies stationed in Weaverville and Hayfork, shall a measure imposing a $45 per year special tax for each parcel developed with residential or commercial uses, until repealed by voters, providing $258,000 annually, requiring all funds to be spent locally with Citizen Oversight, be adopted in accordance with the terms of the Trinity Life Support Community Services District Formation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3852, "no_votes": 1472, "total_votes": 5324, "percent_yes": 72.35161532682194, "percent_no": 27.648384673178057, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a $45 annual special tax on each residential or commerci...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a $45 annual special tax on each residential or commercial parcel in Trinity County to fund local ambulance services, including maintaining two 24/7 emergency ambulances in Weaverville and Hayfork. The tax generates approximately $258,000 annually and remains in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.953800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.459175", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent cuts or elimination of local life-support ambulance service, including two 24/7 ambulances staffed for emergencies stationed in Weaverville and Hayfork, shall a measure imposing a $45 per year special tax for each parcel developed with residential or commercial uses, until repealed by voters, providing $258,000 annually, requiring all funds to be spent locally with Citizen Oversight, be adopted in accordance with the terms of the Trinity Life Support Community Services District Formation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3352, "fingerprint": "2020|202000083|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000083|TRINITY", "content_hash": "5241fb5c78f64979", "measure_id": "202000083", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Trinity adopt an ordinance amending section 3.24 of the Trinity County Code by imposing an additional half cent sales and use tax for the purpose of providing more funding to local law enforcement? The allocation of funds collected from the additional half cent sales and use tax shall be 67% to the Sheriff, 17% to the District Attorney and 16% to Probation.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3027, "no_votes": 3093, "total_votes": 6120, "percent_yes": 49.46078431372549, "percent_no": 50.53921568627451, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an additional 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an additional 0.5% sales and use tax in Trinity County to fund local law enforcement, with 67% of revenues going to the Sheriff's department, 17% to the District Attorney, and 16% to Probation services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.954298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.459374", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Trinity adopt an ordinance amending section 3.24 of the Trinity County Code by imposing an additional half cent sales and use tax for the purpose of providing more funding to local law enforcement? The allocation of funds collected from the additional half cent sales and use tax shall be 67% to the Sheriff, 17% to the District Attorney and 16% to Probation.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3363, "fingerprint": "2020|202000703|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000703|TULARE", "content_hash": "36daf2a64f78db05", "measure_id": "202000703", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of high school facilities without increasing the estimated tax rate; repair/replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $17,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 384, "no_votes": 370, "total_votes": 754, "percent_yes": 50.92838196286472, "percent_no": 49.07161803713528, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Kingsburg Joint Union High School Distr...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District to issue $17 million in bonds to repair roofs, upgrade technology access, and modernize classrooms and facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $1 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.958676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.461516", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of high school facilities without increasing the estimated tax rate; repair/replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $17,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3362, "fingerprint": "2020|202000702|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000702|TULARE", "content_hash": "f068237e9fbbf3d3", "measure_id": "202000702", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To fund the operational needs of the Cutler-Orosi Sports Complex(es) and develop Recreation programs within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, arts, music and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens shall levy a tax of $38.00 per parcel annually with annual cost of living adjustment, initially raising approximately $196,308 annually as long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 764, "no_votes": 535, "total_votes": 1299, "percent_yes": 58.8144726712856, "percent_no": 41.1855273287144, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established an annual $38 parcel tax with cost-of-liv...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established an annual $38 parcel tax with cost-of-living adjustments to fund operations of the Cutler-Orosi Sports Complex and develop recreation programs for youth activities including sports, arts, and music. The tax was expected to raise approximately $196,308 annually under oversight of the Cutler-Orosi School Board.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.958398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.461318", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund the operational needs of the Cutler-Orosi Sports Complex(es) and develop Recreation programs within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, arts, music and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens shall levy a tax of $38.00 per parcel annually with annual cost of living adjustment, initially raising approximately $196,308 annually as long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3364, "fingerprint": "2020|202000704|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000704|TULARE", "content_hash": "edb368a3e24b7de0", "measure_id": "202000704", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by constructing, modernizing and renovating classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; and make health and safety improvements, shall the Porterville Unified School Facilities Improvement District measure be adopted authorizing $33,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3.6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2589, "no_votes": 3037, "total_votes": 5626, "percent_yes": 46.01848560255954, "percent_no": 53.98151439744046, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized $33", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized $33.4 million in bonds for the Porterville Unified School District to construct, modernize, and renovate school facilities including classrooms and restrooms, repair roofs, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3.6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $1.8 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.958969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.461720", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by constructing, modernizing and renovating classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; and make health and safety improvements, shall the Porterville Unified School Facilities Improvement District measure be adopted authorizing $33,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $1,800,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3.6\u00a2 per $100 assessed value, annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3365, "fingerprint": "2020|202000705|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000705|TULARE", "content_hash": "36087d92d39487d3", "measure_id": "202000705", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; make security, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall Terra Bella Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $5,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $317,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 274, "no_votes": 389, "total_votes": 663, "percent_yes": 41.32730015082956, "percent_no": 58.67269984917044, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Terra Bella Union School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Terra Bella Union School District to issue $5 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including security upgrades, accessibility modifications, classroom modernization, restroom updates, and roof repairs. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.959282", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.461921", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; make security, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall Terra Bella Union School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $5,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $317,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3366, "fingerprint": "2020|202000706|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000706|TULARE", "content_hash": "eb01139eac97c247", "measure_id": "202000706", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and replace classroom facilities, including roofing, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems, and improve student health, safety, security and access, shall the Waukena Joint Union School District measure be adopted to issue $1.65 million in bonds at legal rates with projected levies of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising an average $113,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring citizens oversight and annual audits and no bond money spent on salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89, "no_votes": 48, "total_votes": 137, "percent_yes": 64.96350364963503, "percent_no": 35.03649635036497, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Waukena Joint Union School District to issue $1", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Waukena Joint Union School District to issue $1.65 million in bonds to repair and replace classroom facilities, including roofing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising an average of $113,000 annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.959587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.462119", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and replace classroom facilities, including roofing, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems, and improve student health, safety, security and access, shall the Waukena Joint Union School District measure be adopted to issue $1.65 million in bonds at legal rates with projected levies of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value, raising an average $113,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring citizens oversight and annual audits and no bond money spent on salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3367, "fingerprint": "2020|202000707|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000707|TULARE", "content_hash": "6dd77446cc4d38a3", "measure_id": "202000707", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of Sunnyside Elementary School; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall the measure of Sunnyside Union School District be adopted authorizing $2,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating approximately $124,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 238, "no_votes": 145, "total_votes": 383, "percent_yes": 62.14099216710183, "percent_no": 37.85900783289817, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.959859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.462311", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of Sunnyside Elementary School; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall the measure of Sunnyside Union School District be adopted authorizing $2,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating approximately $124,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3358, "fingerprint": "2020|202000427|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000427|TULARE", "content_hash": "112d8a66fb0358fe", "measure_id": "202000427", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect Exeter\u2019s long-term financial stability; maintain 911 emergency response; keep the community safe; prevent crime; repair streets/potholes; help retain local businesses; keep public areas and parks clean/safe; support youth/ senior programs, and other general City services; shall the measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $800,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring public disclosure of spending, audits, all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1940, "no_votes": 806, "total_votes": 2746, "percent_yes": 70.64821558630736, "percent_no": 29.35178441369264, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Exeter, California, generating...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1-cent sales tax in Exeter, California, generating approximately $800,000 annually for general city services including emergency response, street repairs, public safety, parks maintenance, and youth and senior programs. The tax includes requirements for public disclosure of spending and audits, with all funds designated for local use, and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.957166", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.460541", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect Exeter\u2019s long-term financial stability; maintain 911 emergency response; keep the community safe; prevent crime; repair streets/potholes; help retain local businesses; keep public areas and parks clean/safe; support youth/ senior programs, and other general City services; shall the measure establishing a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $800,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring public disclosure of spending, audits, all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3360, "fingerprint": "2020|202000428|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000428|TULARE", "content_hash": "40bb29896e596385", "measure_id": "202000428", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure enacting a ten percent (10%) Transient Occupancy Tax to be paid by hotel guests in the City of Farmersville providing funding for general purposes such as city services, programs, economic development, and capital improvements, which is expected to generate an estimated $185,000 annually per hotel and is effective until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 712, "no_votes": 777, "total_votes": 1489, "percent_yes": 47.81732706514439, "percent_no": 52.18267293485561, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted a 10% transient occupancy tax on hotel guests ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted a 10% transient occupancy tax on hotel guests in the City of Farmersville to fund general city services, programs, economic development, and capital improvements. The tax was projected to generate approximately $185,000 annually per hotel and would have remained in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.957793", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.460932", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure enacting a ten percent (10%) Transient Occupancy Tax to be paid by hotel guests in the City of Farmersville providing funding for general purposes such as city services, programs, economic development, and capital improvements, which is expected to generate an estimated $185,000 annually per hotel and is effective until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3359, "fingerprint": "2020|202000429|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000429|TULARE", "content_hash": "22bc12fbc7b1e2e8", "measure_id": "202000429", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1875 be enacted, imposing a local general tax on cannabis businesses at a rate not exceeding $25 per square foot (annually adjusted by CPI) or 10% of gross receipts, to maintain public safety and general City services for Porterville residents; generating undetermined revenue until repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6279, "no_votes": 4407, "total_votes": 10686, "percent_yes": 58.75912408759124, "percent_no": 41.24087591240876, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacted a local general tax on cannabis businesses in Porterville...", "summary_text": "The measure enacted a local general tax on cannabis businesses in Porterville at a rate not exceeding $25 per square foot (annually adjusted for inflation) or 10% of gross receipts. The tax revenue would fund public safety and general city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.957448", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.460739", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1875 be enacted, imposing a local general tax on cannabis businesses at a rate not exceeding $25 per square foot (annually adjusted by CPI) or 10% of gross receipts, to maintain public safety and general City services for Porterville residents; generating undetermined revenue until repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3361, "fingerprint": "2020|202000430|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000430|TULARE", "content_hash": "fedae269049a0aef", "measure_id": "202000430", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding that cannot be taken away by the State of California for general fund infrastructure and City services such as economic development, the promotion of tourism, and the Mighty 190 campaign, shall a City Ordinance be adopted to increase the hotel/motel tax by four percent, update language and confirm equal treatment of traditional and online bookings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4974, "no_votes": 5619, "total_votes": 10593, "percent_yes": 46.95553667516284, "percent_no": 53.04446332483716, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased Tulare's hotel/motel tax by four percent an...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased Tulare's hotel/motel tax by four percent and updated the tax code to ensure equal treatment of traditional and online bookings. The revenue would have funded general city services including infrastructure, economic development, tourism promotion, and the Mighty 190 campaign.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.958118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.461125", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding that cannot be taken away by the State of California for general fund infrastructure and City services such as economic development, the promotion of tourism, and the Mighty 190 campaign, shall a City Ordinance be adopted to increase the hotel/motel tax by four percent, update language and confirm equal treatment of traditional and online bookings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3371, "fingerprint": "2020|202000431|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000431|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "202000431", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 715, "no_votes": 840, "total_votes": 1555, "percent_yes": 45.98070739549839, "percent_no": 54.01929260450161, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the City Clerk and City Treasurer positions i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the City Clerk and City Treasurer positions in Tuolumne from elected offices to positions appointed by the city government. The measure failed with 46% support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.961010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.463096", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3369, "fingerprint": "2020|202000084|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000084|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "c6608b272c077731", "measure_id": "202000084", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the County of Tuolumne to collect a one percent Transactions and Use Tax (sales tax) in the unincorporated areas of the County for unrestricted general revenue purposes, providing approximately $4,500,000 annually until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5743, "no_votes": 13609, "total_votes": 19352, "percent_yes": 29.676519222819348, "percent_no": 70.32348077718065, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized Tuolumne County to collect a 1% sales tax i...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized Tuolumne County to collect a 1% sales tax in unincorporated areas of the county for general revenue purposes, generating approximately $4.5 million annually. The tax would have remained in effect until voters chose to end it in a future election.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.960446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.462710", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the County of Tuolumne to collect a one percent Transactions and Use Tax (sales tax) in the unincorporated areas of the County for unrestricted general revenue purposes, providing approximately $4,500,000 annually until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3370, "fingerprint": "2020|202000085|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000085|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "6691e756c0abe39e", "measure_id": "202000085", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure increasing the transient occupancy tax from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) and expanding application of the tax to campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks in the unincorporated areas of Tuolumne County, to address the impacts of tourism on roads, emergency response and other County services, providing approximately $1,850,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes until ended by voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9744, "no_votes": 11269, "total_votes": 21013, "percent_yes": 46.37129396088136, "percent_no": 53.62870603911864, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased Tuolumne County's transient occupancy tax f...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased Tuolumne County's transient occupancy tax from 10% to 12% and extended the tax to include campgrounds and RV parks in unincorporated areas. The change was projected to generate approximately $1.85 million annually in unrestricted general revenue for county services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.960745", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.462902", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure increasing the transient occupancy tax from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) and expanding application of the tax to campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks in the unincorporated areas of Tuolumne County, to address the impacts of tourism on roads, emergency response and other County services, providing approximately $1,850,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes until ended by voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3372, "fingerprint": "2020|202000432|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000432|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "202000432", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1197, "no_votes": 1087, "total_votes": 2284, "percent_yes": 52.408056042031525, "percent_no": 47.591943957968475, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.961274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.463285", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3373, "fingerprint": "2020|202000433|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000433|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "202000433", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1158, "no_votes": 1117, "total_votes": 2275, "percent_yes": 50.9010989010989, "percent_no": 49.0989010989011, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.961565", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.463474", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3374, "fingerprint": "2020|202000434|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000434|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "859bf76b477b443d", "measure_id": "202000434", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure increasing the existing transient occupancy tax (\u201cHotel Tax\u201d), paid only by hotel/short-term rental guests, by 2%, from 10% to 12%, and expanding the tax to also include those staying in campgrounds and recreational-vehicle parks within the City of Sonora, providing approximately an additional $80,000 annually toward addressing the impacts of tourism on City services, including law enforcement, emergency response, roads, and other general services, until ended by City Council or City voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1358, "no_votes": 1033, "total_votes": 2391, "percent_yes": 56.79631953157674, "percent_no": 43.20368046842326, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax in the City of Sonora from...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax in the City of Sonora from 10% to 12% and expanded it to include campgrounds and RV parks, with the additional revenue estimated at $80,000 annually to fund city services impacted by tourism.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.961836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.463664", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure increasing the existing transient occupancy tax (\u201cHotel Tax\u201d), paid only by hotel/short-term rental guests, by 2%, from 10% to 12%, and expanding the tax to also include those staying in campgrounds and recreational-vehicle parks within the City of Sonora, providing approximately an additional $80,000 annually toward addressing the impacts of tourism on City services, including law enforcement, emergency response, roads, and other general services, until ended by City Council or City voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3368, "fingerprint": "2020|202000086|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000086|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "556f5804a5491eeb", "measure_id": "202000086", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "For the continued funding of general services impacted by tourism, such as fire safety, road maintenance, law enforcement, animal control, libraries and parks, shall the measure increasing the existing Transient Occupancy Tax (\u201cTourism Tax\u201d) from 10% to 12%, applying only to guests of hotels and other short-term lodging in the unincorporated areas of Tuolumne County, and expanding its application to campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, generating an estimated $1,850,000 annually, be adopted? (Duration: until repealed)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15854, "no_votes": 13756, "total_votes": 29610, "percent_yes": 53.54272205336035, "percent_no": 46.45727794663965, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Tuolumne County's transient occupancy tax from 10% to ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Tuolumne County's transient occupancy tax from 10% to 12% and expanded it to include campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks in unincorporated areas. The tax applies to guests staying in hotels and short-term lodging, with revenue funding general services such as fire safety, road maintenance, law enforcement, animal control, libraries, and parks.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.960136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.462509", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the continued funding of general services impacted by tourism, such as fire safety, road maintenance, law enforcement, animal control, libraries and parks, shall the measure increasing the existing Transient Occupancy Tax (\u201cTourism Tax\u201d) from 10% to 12%, applying only to guests of hotels and other short-term lodging in the unincorporated areas of Tuolumne County, and expanding its application to campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, generating an estimated $1,850,000 annually, be adopted? (Duration: until repealed)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3388, "fingerprint": "2020|202000709|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000709|VENTURA", "content_hash": "f7533c7c3fd42485", "measure_id": "202000709", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; remove hazardous materials, improve safety/ security, labs, classrooms, technology for math, science, engineering, arts, killed trade, college/career readiness instruction; shall Moorpark Unified School District's measure authorizing $96,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/ $100 assessed value ($5,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, to renovate, acquire, construct/ repair classrooms, facilities, sites, equipment, be adopted, with citizen oversight, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5328, "no_votes": 6349, "total_votes": 11677, "percent_yes": 45.62815791727327, "percent_no": 54.37184208272673, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Moorpark Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Moorpark Unified School District to issue $96 million in bonds to repair and renovate school facilities, including roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, classrooms, and laboratories. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $5 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.965905", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.466396", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; remove hazardous materials, improve safety/ security, labs, classrooms, technology for math, science, engineering, arts, killed trade, college/career readiness instruction; shall Moorpark Unified School District's measure authorizing $96,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/ $100 assessed value ($5,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, to renovate, acquire, construct/ repair classrooms, facilities, sites, equipment, be adopted, with citizen oversight, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3377, "fingerprint": "2020|202000436|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000436|VENTURA", "content_hash": "4447e51091ce657d", "measure_id": "202000436", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase fiscal accountability, prevent special interest influence/political conflicts of interest, improve City ethics, governance, transparency without new City powers, shall Oxnard City Code be amended to prohibit elected officials from accepting gifts from lobbyists/City contractors; impose contribution limits on candidates for all elected office; limit Mayor/Councilmembers to three consecutive four-year terms, require posting monthly financial reports and all expensive City contracts on City\u2019s website for public review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25393, "no_votes": 5395, "total_votes": 30788, "percent_yes": 82.47693906716903, "percent_no": 17.523060932830973, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Oxnard's City Code to prohibit elected officials from ac...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Oxnard's City Code to prohibit elected officials from accepting gifts from lobbyists and city contractors, impose campaign contribution limits, establish three consecutive four-year term limits for the mayor and council members, and require monthly financial reports and expensive city contracts to be posted online for public review.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.962757", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.464244", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase fiscal accountability, prevent special interest influence/political conflicts of interest, improve City ethics, governance, transparency without new City powers, shall Oxnard City Code be amended to prohibit elected officials from accepting gifts from lobbyists/City contractors; impose contribution limits on candidates for all elected office; limit Mayor/Councilmembers to three consecutive four-year terms, require posting monthly financial reports and all expensive City contracts on City\u2019s website for public review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3386, "fingerprint": "2020|202000435|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000435|VENTURA", "content_hash": "77864d655ef42ac9", "measure_id": "202000435", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to fund capital improvement and other projects by imposing an additional 5% special transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) on hotel guests, expressly confirming the existing \u201crent\u201d definition as including resort fees, cancelation fees, parking fees, and similar fees, raising approximately $1,300,000 - $1,700,000 in additional annual revenue to fund City capital improvement and maintenance projects, including street paving; and fire mitigation, code enforcement, and climate change mitigation; until voters decide otherwise, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2846, "no_votes": 579, "total_votes": 3425, "percent_yes": 83.0948905109489, "percent_no": 16.9051094890511, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed an additional 5% transient occupancy tax on hotel guests...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed an additional 5% transient occupancy tax on hotel guests in Ventura, expanding the tax base to explicitly include resort fees, cancellation fees, and parking fees. The tax generates approximately $1.3-1.7 million annually to fund capital improvements including street paving, fire mitigation, code enforcement, and climate change mitigation projects.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.965293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.465989", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to fund capital improvement and other projects by imposing an additional 5% special transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) on hotel guests, expressly confirming the existing \u201crent\u201d definition as including resort fees, cancelation fees, parking fees, and similar fees, raising approximately $1,300,000 - $1,700,000 in additional annual revenue to fund City capital improvement and maintenance projects, including street paving; and fire mitigation, code enforcement, and climate change mitigation; until voters decide otherwise, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3378, "fingerprint": "2020|202000437|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000437|VENTURA", "content_hash": "409c88c349a087f5", "measure_id": "202000437", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of Santa Paula City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2815, "no_votes": 2595, "total_votes": 5410, "percent_yes": 52.03327171903882, "percent_no": 47.96672828096118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changes the Santa Paula City Clerk and City Treasurer positions ...", "summary_text": "This measure changes the Santa Paula City Clerk and City Treasurer positions from elected offices to appointed positions. The city council would appoint these officials rather than having them chosen by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.963024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.464443", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of Santa Paula City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3384, "fingerprint": "2020|202000442|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000442|VENTURA", "content_hash": "af490a473d11e6da", "measure_id": "202000442", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance establishing 1\u00bd\u00a2 sales tax to help maintain 911 emergency response times, natural disaster, public health/emergency preparedness; fund fire stations; address homelessness; attract/retain local businesses/jobs; keep public areas safe/clean; aid Oxnard\u2019s long-term financial stability; fund general services/infrastructure; requiring annual audits, public disclosure of all spending; providing $40,000,000 annually until ended by voters, used only for Oxnard, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36197, "no_votes": 30931, "total_votes": 67128, "percent_yes": 53.92235728757001, "percent_no": 46.07764271242999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1.5-cent sales tax in Oxnard to fund emergency services, fire stations, homelessness programs, business attraction, public safety, and general city services and infrastructure. The tax generates approximately $40 million annually and requires annual audits and public disclosure of spending.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.964755", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.465604", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance establishing 1\u00bd\u00a2 sales tax to help maintain 911 emergency response times, natural disaster, public health/emergency preparedness; fund fire stations; address homelessness; attract/retain local businesses/jobs; keep public areas safe/clean; aid Oxnard\u2019s long-term financial stability; fund general services/infrastructure; requiring annual audits, public disclosure of all spending; providing $40,000,000 annually until ended by voters, used only for Oxnard, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3376, "fingerprint": "2020|202000443|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000443|VENTURA", "content_hash": "fac6a2f315baba63", "measure_id": "202000443", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require expedited processing of certain city-issued development permits if projects meet specific requirements and project applications are filed by specified professionals who receive required training pursuant to a new program that includes audits of approved permits and appeals of adverse audit results, certain denied permits, and adverse certification actions against specified professionals to a designated appeals board, the decision of which may be appealed to the city council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33248, "no_votes": 32314, "total_votes": 65562, "percent_yes": 50.71230285836308, "percent_no": 49.28769714163692, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.962454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.464051", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require expedited processing of certain city-issued development permits if projects meet specific requirements and project applications are filed by specified professionals who receive required training pursuant to a new program that includes audits of approved permits and appeals of adverse audit results, certain denied permits, and adverse certification actions against specified professionals to a designated appeals board, the decision of which may be appealed to the city council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3382, "fingerprint": "2020|202000438|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000438|VENTURA", "content_hash": "f50754e909285fcb", "measure_id": "202000438", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure approving an immediate 3% tax on cannabis businesses, which will potentially add $465,000 - $1,550,000 annually to fund general city services, and approving authority for the City of Ojai to increase the tax on cannabis businesses up to 10% of gross receipts in the future, until the voters decide otherwise, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3165, "no_votes": 1408, "total_votes": 4573, "percent_yes": 69.2105838617975, "percent_no": 30.789416138202498, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed an immediate 3% tax on cannabis businesses in Ojai and a...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed an immediate 3% tax on cannabis businesses in Ojai and authorized the city to increase that tax up to 10% of gross receipts in the future without additional voter approval. The tax revenue would fund general city services and was estimated to generate $465,000 to $1,550,000 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.964180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.465222", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure approving an immediate 3% tax on cannabis businesses, which will potentially add $465,000 - $1,550,000 annually to fund general city services, and approving authority for the City of Ojai to increase the tax on cannabis businesses up to 10% of gross receipts in the future, until the voters decide otherwise, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3390, "fingerprint": "2020|202000711|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000711|VENTURA", "content_hash": "d1e275a546615d5d", "measure_id": "202000711", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve and improve academic programs including reading, writing, music, art, science and math; fund computer technology; retain highly qualified teachers; maintain career and technical training programs; and maintain small class sizes, shall Ventura Unified School District\u2019s measure to renew its existing $59 parcel tax for four years be approved, raising approximately $2.2 million annually, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, all funds spent on neighborhood schools, and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47075, "no_votes": 17264, "total_votes": 64339, "percent_yes": 73.16713035639349, "percent_no": 26.832869643606514, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed Ventura Unified School District's existing $59 annual pa...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed Ventura Unified School District's existing $59 annual parcel tax for four years to raise approximately $2.2 million annually for academic programs, technology, teacher retention, and maintaining small class sizes. The measure included provisions for citizen oversight and prohibited use of funds for administrative salaries or state takeover.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.966452", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.466790", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve and improve academic programs including reading, writing, music, art, science and math; fund computer technology; retain highly qualified teachers; maintain career and technical training programs; and maintain small class sizes, shall Ventura Unified School District\u2019s measure to renew its existing $59 parcel tax for four years be approved, raising approximately $2.2 million annually, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, all funds spent on neighborhood schools, and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3385, "fingerprint": "2020|202000444|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000444|VENTURA", "content_hash": "0a91ce76b4b08075", "measure_id": "202000444", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund city services (public safety, roads, parks, etc.), shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) and hemp businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 8% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses, should the city council legalize them at a future date; which will generate an unknown amount of revenue and will be levied until repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42321, "no_votes": 16583, "total_votes": 58904, "percent_yes": 71.84741273937254, "percent_no": 28.152587260627456, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the City of Ventura to tax cannabis and hemp businesse...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the City of Ventura to tax cannabis and hemp businesses at specified rates - up to $10 per canopy square foot for cultivation, 8% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis businesses - to fund city services, contingent on the city council legalizing such businesses in the future. The tax would remain in effect until repealed and would generate an undetermined amount of revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.965020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.465801", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund city services (public safety, roads, parks, etc.), shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) and hemp businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 8% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses, should the city council legalize them at a future date; which will generate an unknown amount of revenue and will be levied until repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3381, "fingerprint": "2020|202000445|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000445|VENTURA", "content_hash": "7928cba703095ee7", "measure_id": "202000445", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to deliver street, park, sewer, and water improvements and other public works projects more efficiently and less expensively, shall Sections 400 and 1006 of the City Charter be amended to create more flexibility in the methods used to deliver those projects when the City Council designates, by ordinance, the methods allowed and determines that a particular project would benefit from those methods?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42134, "no_votes": 15086, "total_votes": 57220, "percent_yes": 73.63509262495631, "percent_no": 26.364907375043686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended the City Charter to give the City Council more flexibilit...", "summary_text": "The measure amended the City Charter to give the City Council more flexibility in choosing delivery methods for public works projects like street, park, sewer, and water improvements. The amendment allows the Council to designate alternative project delivery methods through ordinance when they determine a particular project would benefit from those methods.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.963869", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.465033", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to deliver street, park, sewer, and water improvements and other public works projects more efficiently and less expensively, shall Sections 400 and 1006 of the City Charter be amended to create more flexibility in the methods used to deliver those projects when the City Council designates, by ordinance, the methods allowed and determines that a particular project would benefit from those methods?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3389, "fingerprint": "2020|202000710|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000710|VENTURA", "content_hash": "31464cbb432fe1d1", "measure_id": "202000710", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools; modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and facilities; upgrade outdated electrical, plumbing, and sewer systems; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Ojai Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $45,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $2,336,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.7 cents per $100 assessed value, annual audits, no money for salaries, citizen oversight, and no money taken by the State", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7838, "no_votes": 5119, "total_votes": 12957, "percent_yes": 60.492397931619976, "percent_no": 39.507602068380024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Ojai Unified School District to issue $45 million ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Ojai Unified School District to issue $45 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, upgrade infrastructure systems, and make health and safety improvements to school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 2.7 cents per $100 of assessed value and include provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.966176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.466590", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools; modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and facilities; upgrade outdated electrical, plumbing, and sewer systems; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Ojai Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $45,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $2,336,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 2.7 cents per $100 assessed value, annual audits, no money for salaries, citizen oversight, and no money taken by the State", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3379, "fingerprint": "2020|202000439|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000439|VENTURA", "content_hash": "f975bbe6eea93fc5", "measure_id": "202000439", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance to increase the powers of the City Treasurer, limit the City Council\u2019s ability to restrict the powers of the City Treasurer, reduce oversight authority of the City Manager and Director of Finance, mandate the City Treasurer's assumption of professional responsibilities over the City's $523,000,000 Budget, $256,000,000 Investment Portfolio, Finance Department, preparation and submittal of the annual municipal budget, and professional financial operations of the City, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24774, "no_votes": 39862, "total_votes": 64636, "percent_yes": 38.32848567361842, "percent_no": 61.67151432638158, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have expanded the City Treasurer's authority to include...", "summary_text": "This initiative would have expanded the City Treasurer's authority to include oversight of Ventura's $523 million budget, $256 million investment portfolio, and Finance Department, while reducing the City Council's ability to restrict these powers and limiting oversight by the City Manager and Director of Finance. The measure would have transferred significant financial responsibilities from other city officials to the City Treasurer position.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.963293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.464639", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance to increase the powers of the City Treasurer, limit the City Council\u2019s ability to restrict the powers of the City Treasurer, reduce oversight authority of the City Manager and Director of Finance, mandate the City Treasurer's assumption of professional responsibilities over the City's $523,000,000 Budget, $256,000,000 Investment Portfolio, Finance Department, preparation and submittal of the annual municipal budget, and professional financial operations of the City, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3380, "fingerprint": "2020|202000440|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000440|VENTURA", "content_hash": "2d6fbd27a6bdc5be", "measure_id": "202000440", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance mandating meetings of City legislative bodies to use Robert\u2019s Rules of Order, advance release of pre-recorded staff presentations, obtain guidebooks and training from a professional Parliamentarian on meeting procedures, restrict meeting start times, and alter existing rules for public comment, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36549, "no_votes": 27318, "total_votes": 63867, "percent_yes": 57.22673681243835, "percent_no": 42.77326318756165, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure mandated that Ventura City legislative bodies use Robert's Rules...", "summary_text": "This measure mandated that Ventura City legislative bodies use Robert's Rules of Order, required advance release of pre-recorded staff presentations, mandated parliamentarian training, restricted meeting start times, and changed public comment rules.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.963573", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.464837", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance mandating meetings of City legislative bodies to use Robert\u2019s Rules of Order, advance release of pre-recorded staff presentations, obtain guidebooks and training from a professional Parliamentarian on meeting procedures, restrict meeting start times, and alter existing rules for public comment, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3383, "fingerprint": "2020|202000441|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000441|VENTURA", "content_hash": "f7c4e1e5f6af028f", "measure_id": "202000441", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall initiative ordinance to mandate revisions to Measure O (adopted by Oxnard voters in 2008) to either end Measure O funding early for City services such as fire, emergency response, street paving/pothole repair, youth recreation, after school and anti-gang prevention programs, parks/open space preservation, and senior services if specific pavement standards for city streets and alleys are not met, or extend currently-approved expiration date if pavement standards are met, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33492, "no_votes": 31215, "total_votes": 64707, "percent_yes": 51.7594696091613, "percent_no": 48.2405303908387, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would modify Measure O (a 2008 funding measure for city servi...", "summary_text": "This initiative would modify Measure O (a 2008 funding measure for city services) to either terminate its funding early if specific pavement standards for streets and alleys are not met, or extend the measure's expiration date if the pavement standards are achieved.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.964483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.465414", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall initiative ordinance to mandate revisions to Measure O (adopted by Oxnard voters in 2008) to either end Measure O funding early for City services such as fire, emergency response, street paving/pothole repair, youth recreation, after school and anti-gang prevention programs, parks/open space preservation, and senior services if specific pavement standards for city streets and alleys are not met, or extend currently-approved expiration date if pavement standards are met, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3375, "fingerprint": "2020|202000087|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000087|VENTURA", "content_hash": "5fad9e7d4aca13f7", "measure_id": "202000087", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance to allow the commercial cultivation, processing, distribution and sale of cannabis within the unincorporated area of Ventura County, limited to 500 acres for indoor general cannabis cultivation and 100 acres for indoor nursery cultivation, with sales allowed between licensed distributors but not to the general public, and to impose a tax of four percent of gross receipts on general cannabis cultivation and one percent of gross receipts on cannabis nursery cultivation, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 227964, "no_votes": 170437, "total_votes": 398401, "percent_yes": 57.21973589423721, "percent_no": 42.78026410576279, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance allows commercial cannabis cultivation, processing, and distri...", "summary_text": "This ordinance allows commercial cannabis cultivation, processing, and distribution in unincorporated Ventura County, limited to 500 acres for general cultivation and 100 acres for nurseries, with sales restricted to licensed distributors only. It also establishes a 4% tax on general cannabis cultivation gross receipts and a 1% tax on nursery cultivation gross receipts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.962105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.463860", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance to allow the commercial cultivation, processing, distribution and sale of cannabis within the unincorporated area of Ventura County, limited to 500 acres for indoor general cannabis cultivation and 100 acres for indoor nursery cultivation, with sales allowed between licensed distributors but not to the general public, and to impose a tax of four percent of gross receipts on general cannabis cultivation and one percent of gross receipts on cannabis nursery cultivation, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3387, "fingerprint": "2020|202000708|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000708|VENTURA", "content_hash": "d7f7a46fd905e6f2", "measure_id": "202000708", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To locally fund upgrades for safe/modern schools; enhance instructional technology, college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts; improve safety, security, emergency/fire systems; repair, acquire, construct, equip classrooms, sites, facilities, roofs, plumbing, heating/air conditioning; shall Las Virgenes Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents per $100 assessed value ($11,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight and local control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 326, "no_votes": 381, "total_votes": 707, "percent_yes": 46.11032531824611, "percent_no": 53.88967468175389, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Las Virgenes Unified School District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Las Virgenes Unified School District to issue $198 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements, technology upgrades, and infrastructure repairs. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax of 2 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $11 million annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.965606", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.466191", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To locally fund upgrades for safe/modern schools; enhance instructional technology, college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts; improve safety, security, emergency/fire systems; repair, acquire, construct, equip classrooms, sites, facilities, roofs, plumbing, heating/air conditioning; shall Las Virgenes Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents per $100 assessed value ($11,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight and local control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3393, "fingerprint": "2020|202000449|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000449|YOLO", "content_hash": "60fabd3ca830071c", "measure_id": "202000449", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure amending the City of Winters General Plan to (1) establish an Urban Growth Boundary that would prohibit urban development outside of that boundary, subject to certain exceptions, and (2) adopt a community driven planning process that would apply to areas outside the City limits but within the City\u2019s sphere of influence, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2424, "no_votes": 887, "total_votes": 3311, "percent_yes": 73.21051041981275, "percent_no": 26.78948958018725, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the City of Winters General Plan to establish an Urban G...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the City of Winters General Plan to establish an Urban Growth Boundary that prohibits urban development outside specified boundaries with certain exceptions, and adopted a community-driven planning process for areas outside city limits but within the city's sphere of influence.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.967338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.467403", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure amending the City of Winters General Plan to (1) establish an Urban Growth Boundary that would prohibit urban development outside of that boundary, subject to certain exceptions, and (2) adopt a community driven planning process that would apply to areas outside the City limits but within the City\u2019s sphere of influence, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3391, "fingerprint": "2020|202000447|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000447|YOLO", "content_hash": "423da37e5f7ca867", "measure_id": "202000447", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution 20-110 be adopted to amend the Davis General Plan to approve a mixed-use development comprised of innovation center, housing, and retail uses, by changing the land use designations for the Davis Innovation & Sustainability Campus and Mace Triangle properties from Agriculture and Public/Quasi-Public to Innovation Center, Urban Agriculture Transition Area, General Commercial and Public/Semi-Public, and by establishing the Baseline Project Features?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15189, "no_votes": 16458, "total_votes": 31647, "percent_yes": 47.99507062280785, "percent_no": 52.00492937719215, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have amended the Davis General Plan to change the l...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have amended the Davis General Plan to change the land use designations of two properties from Agriculture and Public/Quasi-Public to various commercial and mixed-use categories, allowing development of the Davis Innovation & Sustainability Campus with innovation center, housing, and retail components. The measure failed with 48% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.966719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.466991", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution 20-110 be adopted to amend the Davis General Plan to approve a mixed-use development comprised of innovation center, housing, and retail uses, by changing the land use designations for the Davis Innovation & Sustainability Campus and Mace Triangle properties from Agriculture and Public/Quasi-Public to Innovation Center, Urban Agriculture Transition Area, General Commercial and Public/Semi-Public, and by establishing the Baseline Project Features?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3402, "fingerprint": "2020|202000714|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000714|YOLO", "content_hash": "535ed9ad4495c650", "measure_id": "202000714", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8579, "no_votes": 10710, "total_votes": 19289, "percent_yes": 44.47612628959511, "percent_no": 55.52387371040489, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to issue $228.4 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct classrooms and buildings for career and technical education programs across its campuses. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.969775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.469146", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3392, "fingerprint": "2020|202000448|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000448|YOLO", "content_hash": "9cff056002327e07", "measure_id": "202000448", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2581, which extends the sunset date of \u201cMeasure J\u201d (Ordinance No. 2350 \u2013 the Citizens\u2019 Right to Vote on Future Use of Open Space and Agricultural Lands) to December 31, 2030 and makes minor technical changes to the Ordinance, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25761, "no_votes": 5370, "total_votes": 31131, "percent_yes": 82.75031319263756, "percent_no": 17.249686807362437, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure extends Yolo County's Measure J ordinance until December 31, 2030...", "summary_text": "The measure extends Yolo County's Measure J ordinance until December 31, 2030, which requires voter approval for future development of open space and agricultural lands. It also makes minor technical changes to the existing ordinance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.967034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.467181", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2581, which extends the sunset date of \u201cMeasure J\u201d (Ordinance No. 2350 \u2013 the Citizens\u2019 Right to Vote on Future Use of Open Space and Agricultural Lands) to December 31, 2030 and makes minor technical changes to the Ordinance, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3401, "fingerprint": "2020|202000713|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000713|YOLO", "content_hash": "cf1a302c69560162", "measure_id": "202000713", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing future tax rates, shall the measure to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom Lake and Sacramento City campuses for job training, nursing/ healthcare, engineering/ science and fire/ police programs, by Los Rios Community College District to authorize $650 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $52 million per year until repaid, an average tax levy less than $0.02 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and taxpayer oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27055, "no_votes": 12851, "total_votes": 39906, "percent_yes": 67.79682253295243, "percent_no": 32.20317746704757, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Los Rios Community College District to issue $650...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Los Rios Community College District to issue $650 million in bonds to repair classrooms, facilities, and labs across five campuses for various job training and educational programs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of less than $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $52 million annually until repaid.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.969513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.468947", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing future tax rates, shall the measure to repair classrooms, facilities and labs at American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom Lake and Sacramento City campuses for job training, nursing/ healthcare, engineering/ science and fire/ police programs, by Los Rios Community College District to authorize $650 million of bonds be adopted with legal rates, raising an average $52 million per year until repaid, an average tax levy less than $0.02 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits and taxpayer oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3400, "fingerprint": "2020|202000712|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000712|YOLO", "content_hash": "724957acbdfafcfa", "measure_id": "202000712", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain quality teachers and staff by keeping compensation competitive in order to (a) preserve outstanding instruction in math, science, reading, writing, history, social studies and technology; (b) support arts, music; (c) limit class sizes; and (d) support student health and safety; shall a Davis Joint Unified School District ongoing parcel tax of $198/year, adjusted annually for inflation, be adopted, raising approximately $3,000,000/year, with senior, disability, employee exemptions and citizens oversight; for Davis schools only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19230, "no_votes": 9027, "total_votes": 28257, "percent_yes": 68.0539335385922, "percent_no": 31.946066461407796, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established an ongoing annual parcel tax of $198 per year (adjust...", "summary_text": "The measure established an ongoing annual parcel tax of $198 per year (adjusted for inflation) within the Davis Joint Unified School District to fund teacher compensation, instruction, arts and music programs, class size limitations, and student health and safety. The tax includes exemptions for seniors, disabled persons, and district employees, and is overseen by citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.969250", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.468757", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain quality teachers and staff by keeping compensation competitive in order to (a) preserve outstanding instruction in math, science, reading, writing, history, social studies and technology; (b) support arts, music; (c) limit class sizes; and (d) support student health and safety; shall a Davis Joint Unified School District ongoing parcel tax of $198/year, adjusted annually for inflation, be adopted, raising approximately $3,000,000/year, with senior, disability, employee exemptions and citizens oversight; for Davis schools only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3404, "fingerprint": "2020|202000716|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000716|YOLO", "content_hash": "34ef0ab867072b50", "measure_id": "202000716", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; keeping schools safe; updating technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/jobs/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $14,600,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6\u00a2/$100 of assessed value, averaging $845,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight/all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 416, "no_votes": 220, "total_votes": 636, "percent_yes": 65.40880503144653, "percent_no": 34.59119496855347, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the River Delta Unified School District to issue $14", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the River Delta Unified School District to issue $14.6 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including fixing roofs, removing asbestos and mold, updating technology and safety systems, and constructing new educational facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.970460", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.469533", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; keeping schools safe; updating technology, fire/drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/jobs/careers, shall River Delta Unified School District issue $14,600,000 in bonds at legal rates levying an estimated 6\u00a2/$100 of assessed value, averaging $845,000 raised annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight/all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3397, "fingerprint": "2020|202000446|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000446|YOLO", "content_hash": "7c43910c8845f516", "measure_id": "202000446", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance extending the existing one percent sales tax with no increase to the current rate, providing approximately $8,600,000 annually until repealed by the voters, subject to annual review, with all funds staying local, and continuing existing funding for city services such as police, fire, recreation programs, city roads, sidewalks, bike path maintenance, and other city services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20843, "no_votes": 4412, "total_votes": 25255, "percent_yes": 82.53019204117996, "percent_no": 17.46980795882004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended Yolo's existing one percent sales tax at the current ra...", "summary_text": "This measure extended Yolo's existing one percent sales tax at the current rate, generating approximately $8.6 million annually for city services including police, fire, recreation programs, and infrastructure maintenance. The extension continues until repealed by voters and is subject to annual review.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.968395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.468189", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance extending the existing one percent sales tax with no increase to the current rate, providing approximately $8,600,000 annually until repealed by the voters, subject to annual review, with all funds staying local, and continuing existing funding for city services such as police, fire, recreation programs, city roads, sidewalks, bike path maintenance, and other city services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3399, "fingerprint": "2020|202000454|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000454|YOLO", "content_hash": "5ead43022015e997", "measure_id": "202000454", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, which would authorize the City of Woodland to continue to collect, for a period of ten years, a one-quarter cent sales tax for general city services, providing approximately $2.8 million annually and would not increase taxes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16327, "no_votes": 9415, "total_votes": 25742, "percent_yes": 63.425530261828925, "percent_no": 36.574469738171075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Woodland to continue collecting a one-qua...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Woodland to continue collecting a one-quarter cent sales tax for ten years to fund general city services, generating approximately $2.8 million annually. The measure maintained an existing tax rate rather than implementing a new increase.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.968986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.468569", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, which would authorize the City of Woodland to continue to collect, for a period of ten years, a one-quarter cent sales tax for general city services, providing approximately $2.8 million annually and would not increase taxes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3395, "fingerprint": "2020|202000450|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000450|YOLO", "content_hash": "b1588f654052ffc8", "measure_id": "202000450", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 25% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax\r\nmeasure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the November 2020 ballot to the\r\nWoodland Public Library to enhance educational and literacy programs and maintain or\r\nexpand hours of operation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14902, "no_votes": 10200, "total_votes": 25102, "percent_yes": 59.36578758664648, "percent_no": 40.63421241335352, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked whether the City Council should allocate 25% of t...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked whether the City Council should allocate 25% of tax revenue from any re-authorized sales tax measure to the Woodland Public Library for educational programs, literacy initiatives, and maintaining or expanding operating hours. The measure was non-binding and served to gauge voter preference on library funding priorities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.967870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.467812", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 25% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax\r\nmeasure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the November 2020 ballot to the\r\nWoodland Public Library to enhance educational and literacy programs and maintain or\r\nexpand hours of operation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3396, "fingerprint": "2020|202000451|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000451|YOLO", "content_hash": "39d45af4243c03ce", "measure_id": "202000451", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 55% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the November 2020 ballot to expand and enhance youth and teen programs and facilities, and reduction of fees charged for use of city recreation facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15418, "no_votes": 9584, "total_votes": 25002, "percent_yes": 61.66706663466923, "percent_no": 38.33293336533077, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked the City Council to allocate 55% of revenue from ...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked the City Council to allocate 55% of revenue from any re-authorized sales tax measure to expanding youth and teen programs and facilities, and reducing recreation facility fees. The measure passed but is non-binding on the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.968132", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.468001", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 55% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the November 2020 ballot to expand and enhance youth and teen programs and facilities, and reduction of fees charged for use of city recreation facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3394, "fingerprint": "2020|202000452|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000452|YOLO", "content_hash": "5f6b3120c441ded4", "measure_id": "202000452", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 15% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the November 2020 ballot to enhance public safety through expand crime prevention and community-building programs that support opportunities for youth within the community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16979, "no_votes": 8009, "total_votes": 24988, "percent_yes": 67.94861533536097, "percent_no": 32.05138466463903, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked whether the City Council should allocate 15% of t...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked whether the City Council should allocate 15% of tax revenue from any re-authorized sales tax measure to enhance public safety through expanded crime prevention and community-building programs for youth. The measure passed with 67.9% voter approval, providing non-binding guidance to the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.967607", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.467615", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 15% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the November 2020 ballot to enhance public safety through expand crime prevention and community-building programs that support opportunities for youth within the community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3398, "fingerprint": "2020|202000453|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000453|YOLO", "content_hash": "39892927ab0c6c4c", "measure_id": "202000453", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate up to 5% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the November 2020 ballot to support a utility ratepayer assistance program for low-income seniors and families?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16633, "no_votes": 8463, "total_votes": 25096, "percent_yes": 66.27749442142175, "percent_no": 33.72250557857825, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked whether the Woodland City Council should allocate...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked whether the Woodland City Council should allocate up to 5% of revenue from any re-authorized sales tax measure to fund a utility ratepayer assistance program for low-income seniors and families. The measure passed with 66.3% support, providing non-binding guidance to the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.968697", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.468380", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate up to 5% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the November 2020 ballot to support a utility ratepayer assistance program for low-income seniors and families?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3406, "fingerprint": "2020|202000718|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000718|YOLO", "content_hash": "747704ecd68f2c47", "measure_id": "202000718", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and complete improvement projects at Winters High and Waggoner Elementary; repair/replace leaky roofs; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Winters Joint Unified School District issue $19,000,000 of bonds, raising on average $1,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2362, "no_votes": 1440, "total_votes": 3802, "percent_yes": 62.12519726459757, "percent_no": 37.87480273540243, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Winters Joint Unified School District to issue $19...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Winters Joint Unified School District to issue $19 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom and restroom modernization at Winters High School and Waggoner Elementary School. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $1 million annually until paid off.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.971120", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.469942", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and complete improvement projects at Winters High and Waggoner Elementary; repair/replace leaky roofs; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Winters Joint Unified School District issue $19,000,000 of bonds, raising on average $1,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3403, "fingerprint": "2020|202000715|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000715|YOLO", "content_hash": "abe6f3d91846afdc", "measure_id": "202000715", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update and expand science, technology, engineering, arts, math classrooms/ labs; improve school safety/ security; replace aging heating, cooling, plumbing systems; improve access for students with disabilities; construct, repair, equip sites/ classrooms, shall the Esparto Unified School District measure authorizing $19,900,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, raising approximately $1,200,000 annually at an estimated $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1503, "no_votes": 1354, "total_votes": 2857, "percent_yes": 52.60763038151908, "percent_no": 47.39236961848092, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Esparto Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Esparto Unified School District to issue $19,900,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including updating STEAM classrooms and labs, enhancing safety and security, replacing aging infrastructure systems, and improving disability access. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.970074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.469342", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update and expand science, technology, engineering, arts, math classrooms/ labs; improve school safety/ security; replace aging heating, cooling, plumbing systems; improve access for students with disabilities; construct, repair, equip sites/ classrooms, shall the Esparto Unified School District measure authorizing $19,900,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, raising approximately $1,200,000 annually at an estimated $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3407, "fingerprint": "2020|202000719|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000719|YOLO", "content_hash": "9f6c17e9aea82700", "measure_id": "202000719", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "With no increase in estimated tax rates, shall Woodland Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure to expand vocational education facilities for programs including automotive engineering/construction trades; improve classroom technology/internet access; repair classrooms/schools; and replace roofs, HVAC, wiring and plumbing be adopted, authorizing $44.205 million of bonds, extending current levies (averaging less than $24/$100,000/year of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding), raising on average $3.23 million/year, with legal interest rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17117, "no_votes": 10722, "total_votes": 27839, "percent_yes": 61.4856855490499, "percent_no": 38.5143144509501, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Woodland Joint Unified School District to issue $44", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Woodland Joint Unified School District to issue $44.205 million in bonds to expand vocational education facilities, improve classroom technology and internet access, and repair school infrastructure including roofs, HVAC systems, wiring, and plumbing. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging less than $24 per $100,000 of assessed property value annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.971421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.470140", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "With no increase in estimated tax rates, shall Woodland Joint Unified School District\u2019s measure to expand vocational education facilities for programs including automotive engineering/construction trades; improve classroom technology/internet access; repair classrooms/schools; and replace roofs, HVAC, wiring and plumbing be adopted, authorizing $44.205 million of bonds, extending current levies (averaging less than $24/$100,000/year of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding), raising on average $3.23 million/year, with legal interest rates, annual audits and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3405, "fingerprint": "2020|202000717|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000717|YOLO", "content_hash": "58c610db132b879b", "measure_id": "202000717", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education with local school improvement funding, shall Washington Unified School District adopt a measure: \u2022 upgrading classrooms/ internet access for science, technology, engineering, arts, math instruction; \u2022 upgrade schools to meet academic, safety, disabled accessibility standards; \u2022 bring all schools up to the same standard; and repairing/ upgrading deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; by issuing $150,000,000 in bonds, $8,500,000 annually, 6 cents/ $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, funds used only to improve local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13614, "no_votes": 8730, "total_votes": 22344, "percent_yes": 60.92910848549946, "percent_no": 39.07089151450054, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized Washington Unified School District to issue $150 milli...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized Washington Unified School District to issue $150 million in bonds to fund classroom upgrades, technology improvements, safety and accessibility upgrades, and repairs to roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.970774", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.469733", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education with local school improvement funding, shall Washington Unified School District adopt a measure: \u2022 upgrading classrooms/ internet access for science, technology, engineering, arts, math instruction; \u2022 upgrade schools to meet academic, safety, disabled accessibility standards; \u2022 bring all schools up to the same standard; and repairing/ upgrading deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; by issuing $150,000,000 in bonds, $8,500,000 annually, 6 cents/ $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, funds used only to improve local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3412, "fingerprint": "2020|202000722|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000722|YUBA", "content_hash": "535ed9ad4495c650", "measure_id": "202000722", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4686, "no_votes": 11212, "total_votes": 15898, "percent_yes": 29.47540571141024, "percent_no": 70.52459428858975, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Yuba Community College District to issue $228.4 million in bonds to repair, modernize, and construct classrooms and buildings for career and technical education programs across its campuses. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $13.3 million annually.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.972995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.471122", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct classrooms/buildings for career/technical education at Yuba and Woodland Colleges and Colusa, Lake and Sutter County campuses including nursing/healthcare, fire/police and agricultural technology, shall the Yuba Community College District measure authorizing $228.4 million of bonds be approved with legal rates, annual levies less than 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (generating $13.3 million per year), annual audits, independent oversight and access to State matching funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3411, "fingerprint": "2020|202000721|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000721|YUBA", "content_hash": "0a9009ef0a11280a", "measure_id": "202000721", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Wheatland High School; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms and school facilities; upgrade deteriorating plumbing; and construct a Science classroom building; shall Wheatland Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $16,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $891,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1575, "no_votes": 2122, "total_votes": 3697, "percent_yes": 42.60210981877197, "percent_no": 57.39789018122803, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Wheatland Union High School District t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Wheatland Union High School District to issue $16.5 million in bonds to repair roofs, modernize classrooms and facilities, upgrade plumbing, and construct a new science building at Wheatland High School. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.972723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.470920", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Wheatland High School; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms and school facilities; upgrade deteriorating plumbing; and construct a Science classroom building; shall Wheatland Union High School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $16,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, generating approximately $891,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3410, "fingerprint": "2020|202000720|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000720|YUBA", "content_hash": "46448f07808ad7ee", "measure_id": "202000720", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the measure to construct a new middle school on prepurchased land to serve a growing student population with space for science, technology, math, art, music and sports, authorize Plumas Lake Elementary School District to issue up to $30,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average $0.07/ $100 of assessed value, generating $1,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with strict accountability including annual audits and no money for salaries, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1122, "no_votes": 1009, "total_votes": 2131, "percent_yes": 52.65133740028156, "percent_no": 47.34866259971844, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized Plumas Lake Elementary School District to i...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized Plumas Lake Elementary School District to issue up to $30 million in bonds to construct a new middle school with facilities for science, technology, math, art, music and sports. The bonds would have been repaid through a property tax levy averaging $0.07 per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $1.5 million annually while the bonds remained outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-03-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.972358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.470723", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to construct a new middle school on prepurchased land to serve a growing student population with space for science, technology, math, art, music and sports, authorize Plumas Lake Elementary School District to issue up to $30,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average $0.07/ $100 of assessed value, generating $1,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with strict accountability including annual audits and no money for salaries, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3408, "fingerprint": "2020|202000455|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000455|YUBA", "content_hash": "91c063c9d6d799be", "measure_id": "202000455", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis or hemp businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $300,000 to $470,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2592, "no_votes": 1577, "total_votes": 4169, "percent_yes": 62.17318301751019, "percent_no": 37.82681698248981, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Yuba to impose taxes on cannabis and hemp...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Yuba to impose taxes on cannabis and hemp businesses at rates up to $10 per canopy square foot for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis businesses. The tax was expected to generate $300,000 to $470,000 annually for general municipal expenses and would remain in effect until repealed by voters or the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.971776", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.470341", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis or hemp businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $300,000 to $470,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3409, "fingerprint": "2020|202000456|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2020|202000456|YUBA", "content_hash": "797ff80df356d02d", "measure_id": "202000456", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2020, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue voter-approved, existing funding (which cannot be taken by the State) and protect/maintain essential City services - including disaster preparedness; 911 emergency response; police officers/neighborhood patrols/crime prevention; fire protection; roads/pothole repair; parks maintenance; and other services - shall the existing half-cent City sales tax generating approximately $330,000 per year be renewed for 10 years, with ongoing required audits and public review and no increase in the tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1244, "no_votes": 312, "total_votes": 1556, "percent_yes": 79.94858611825192, "percent_no": 20.051413881748076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing half-cent city sales tax in Yuba for 10 year...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing half-cent city sales tax in Yuba for 10 years to fund city services including emergency response, police, fire protection, road maintenance, and parks. The renewal would generate approximately $330,000 annually with no increase to the current tax rate.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2020-11-03", "decade": 2020, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.972051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.470529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue voter-approved, existing funding (which cannot be taken by the State) and protect/maintain essential City services - including disaster preparedness; 911 emergency response; police officers/neighborhood patrols/crime prevention; fire protection; roads/pothole repair; parks maintenance; and other services - shall the existing half-cent City sales tax generating approximately $330,000 per year be renewed for 10 years, with ongoing required audits and public review and no increase in the tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3414, "fingerprint": "2019|201900018|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900018|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b38b043f2995241c", "measure_id": "201900018", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance confirming the City Council\u2019s actions to permit reuse of vacant federal buildings on a 3.65-acre parcel on McKay Avenue and allow for the development of a wellness center for senior assisted living and supportive services for homeless individuals by changing the General Plan designation from \u201cFederal Facilities\u201d to \u201cOffice,\u201d removing the Government Combining District classification and maintaining the existing zoning district designation, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11341, "no_votes": 10193, "total_votes": 21534, "percent_yes": 52.66555215008823, "percent_no": 47.33444784991177, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure confirmed the City Council's actions to change the land use desig...", "summary_text": "The measure confirmed the City Council's actions to change the land use designation of a 3.65-acre federal property on McKay Avenue from \"Federal Facilities\" to \"Office\" and remove its Government Combining District classification. This would allow the vacant federal buildings to be reused for a wellness center providing senior assisted living and supportive services for homeless individuals.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-04-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.973728", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.471512", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance confirming the City Council\u2019s actions to permit reuse of vacant federal buildings on a 3.65-acre parcel on McKay Avenue and allow for the development of a wellness center for senior assisted living and supportive services for homeless individuals by changing the General Plan designation from \u201cFederal Facilities\u201d to \u201cOffice,\u201d removing the Government Combining District classification and maintaining the existing zoning district designation, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3413, "fingerprint": "2019|201900017|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900017|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7b1cc35830d16c28", "measure_id": "201900017", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative to change the land use and zoning designations for a 3.65-acre parcel on McKay Avenue, from Office/Administrative-Professional to Open Space, which prohibits the conversion of vacant federal buildings into a senior assisted living facility, medical clinic and supportive services for homeless individuals, and limits the use of the property to parks and related uses, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9400, "no_votes": 11922, "total_votes": 21322, "percent_yes": 44.08592064534284, "percent_no": 55.91407935465716, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have changed the zoning of a 3", "summary_text": "This initiative would have changed the zoning of a 3.65-acre parcel on McKay Avenue from Office/Administrative-Professional to Open Space, preventing the conversion of vacant federal buildings into a senior assisted living facility, medical clinic, and homeless services. The rezoning would have limited the property's use to parks and related activities.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-04-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.973262", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.471316", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative to change the land use and zoning designations for a 3.65-acre parcel on McKay Avenue, from Office/Administrative-Professional to Open Space, which prohibits the conversion of vacant federal buildings into a senior assisted living facility, medical clinic and supportive services for homeless individuals, and limits the use of the property to parks and related uses, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3415, "fingerprint": "2019|201900058|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900058|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5ec12a39befc1ebc", "measure_id": "201900058", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Dublin Unified School District update/replace aging classrooms/science labs; provide 21st century computers/technology/classrooms; ensure classrooms meet safety codes; prevent student overcrowding; and improve energy/operational efficiency and utilize savings for teachers/instruction, by issuing $99 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying in Dublin?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5079, "no_votes": 1736, "total_votes": 6815, "percent_yes": 74.52677916360967, "percent_no": 25.473220836390325, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized Dublin Unified School District to issue $99 million in...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized Dublin Unified School District to issue $99 million in bonds to update classrooms and science labs, provide technology upgrades, ensure safety code compliance, address overcrowding, and improve energy efficiency. The bonds include provisions for independent oversight and restrict funds from being used for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.974049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.471714", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Dublin Unified School District update/replace aging classrooms/science labs; provide 21st century computers/technology/classrooms; ensure classrooms meet safety codes; prevent student overcrowding; and improve energy/operational efficiency and utilize savings for teachers/instruction, by issuing $99 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying in Dublin?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3416, "fingerprint": "2019|201900059|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900059|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ccf9037194c280fb", "measure_id": "201900059", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the high quality of education in Piedmont schools, continue funding programs in math, science, technology, engineering, English, music, and arts, keep textbooks and instructional technology up to date, maintain smaller class sizes, and attract and retain qualified teachers, shall the Piedmont Unified School District renew its expiring parcel tax at an annual rate of $2,763 per parcel for 8 years, providing 10.8 million dollars annually, with independent citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3659, "no_votes": 756, "total_votes": 4415, "percent_yes": 82.87655719139298, "percent_no": 17.123442808607024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an expiring parcel tax in the Piedmont Unified School Di...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an expiring parcel tax in the Piedmont Unified School District at $2,763 per parcel annually for 8 years to fund educational programs, maintain class sizes, update materials, and support teacher retention. The tax generates approximately $10.8 million annually with citizen oversight and local use requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.974342", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.471906", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the high quality of education in Piedmont schools, continue funding programs in math, science, technology, engineering, English, music, and arts, keep textbooks and instructional technology up to date, maintain smaller class sizes, and attract and retain qualified teachers, shall the Piedmont Unified School District renew its expiring parcel tax at an annual rate of $2,763 per parcel for 8 years, providing 10.8 million dollars annually, with independent citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3417, "fingerprint": "2019|201900060|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900060|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5d7f8c983e04e51d", "measure_id": "201900060", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide critically needed funding to attract and retain high quality teachers and educational support staff, shall the Piedmont Unified School District levy a tax of $0.25 per square foot of building improvements, providing 2.6 million dollars annually in dedicated funding for Piedmont schools for 8 years, with independent citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3272, "no_votes": 1127, "total_votes": 4399, "percent_yes": 74.38054103205273, "percent_no": 25.619458967947267, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Piedmont Unified School District to levy a tax of $0", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Piedmont Unified School District to levy a tax of $0.25 per square foot of building improvements for 8 years, generating approximately $2.6 million annually for teacher and educational support staff compensation. The funding includes independent citizen oversight and remains within the local district.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.974661", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.472098", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide critically needed funding to attract and retain high quality teachers and educational support staff, shall the Piedmont Unified School District levy a tax of $0.25 per square foot of building improvements, providing 2.6 million dollars annually in dedicated funding for Piedmont schools for 8 years, with independent citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3418, "fingerprint": "2019|201900001|ALPINE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900001|ALPINE", "content_hash": "fd70b94d204e76ef", "measure_id": "201900001", "measure_letter": "B-Z1", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Alpine", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide needed funding for emergency medical services, fire protection and fire supression services within the expanded Zone 1 of County Service Area No. 1 according to a cost allocation formula based on established land use categories, shall all owners of taxable parcels of real property pay an annual special tax for each of the next 10 years, as provided in Resolution No. R2019-27 of the Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 171, "no_votes": 60, "total_votes": 231, "percent_yes": 74.02597402597402, "percent_no": 25.974025974025977, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes a 10-year annual special tax on all taxable property ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes a 10-year annual special tax on all taxable property parcels in the expanded Zone 1 of County Service Area No. 1 to fund emergency medical services, fire protection, and fire suppression services, with tax amounts determined by a cost allocation formula based on land use categories.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.974924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.472289", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide needed funding for emergency medical services, fire protection and fire supression services within the expanded Zone 1 of County Service Area No. 1 according to a cost allocation formula based on established land use categories, shall all owners of taxable parcels of real property pay an annual special tax for each of the next 10 years, as provided in Resolution No. R2019-27 of the Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alpine_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3419, "fingerprint": "2019|201900002|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900002|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "d7ce5346c10456bd", "measure_id": "201900002", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure increasing the special tax from $75/year to $175/year, without expiration, for taxable parcels on Appaloosa Road, Chestnut Court, Chestnut Way, Dunn, Filly, Hunter, Paint, Shetland and Welsh Roads, constituting the Appaloosa Zone of the Appaloosa Road Community Services District, thus raising approximately $14,000 of additional revenue annually, to restore the purchasing power of funds lost to inflation since the last tax increase in 2005, and to provide additional funding for road improvements, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46, "no_votes": 10, "total_votes": 56, "percent_yes": 82.14285714285714, "percent_no": 17.85714285714286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased the annual special tax for property owners in the Appal...", "summary_text": "The measure increased the annual special tax for property owners in the Appaloosa Zone of the Appaloosa Road Community Services District from $75 to $175 per taxable parcel to generate approximately $14,000 additional revenue annually for road improvements.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.975191", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.472510", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure increasing the special tax from $75/year to $175/year, without expiration, for taxable parcels on Appaloosa Road, Chestnut Court, Chestnut Way, Dunn, Filly, Hunter, Paint, Shetland and Welsh Roads, constituting the Appaloosa Zone of the Appaloosa Road Community Services District, thus raising approximately $14,000 of additional revenue annually, to restore the purchasing power of funds lost to inflation since the last tax increase in 2005, and to provide additional funding for road improvements, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3420, "fingerprint": "2019|201900019|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900019|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "2c042fdc27cb226f", "measure_id": "201900019", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure permanently increasing the City of Angels\u2019 transient occupancy tax from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%), to generate an additional $200,000 annually from hotel and vacation rental guests, to fund essential public services including emergency fire response and protection, police patrols, public works maintenance, business attraction and retention; and to increase the City\u2019s appropriations limit for Fiscal Years 2020-2024 by the amount of tax proceeds received by the increase, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 726, "no_votes": 159, "total_votes": 885, "percent_yes": 82.03389830508473, "percent_no": 17.966101694915267, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure permanently increased the City of Angels' transient occupancy ta...", "summary_text": "This measure permanently increased the City of Angels' transient occupancy tax from 10% to 12% on hotel and vacation rental stays, expected to generate an additional $200,000 annually for public services. The measure also increased the city's appropriations limit for fiscal years 2020-2024 by the amount of additional tax revenue collected.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.975498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.472703", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure permanently increasing the City of Angels\u2019 transient occupancy tax from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%), to generate an additional $200,000 annually from hotel and vacation rental guests, to fund essential public services including emergency fire response and protection, police patrols, public works maintenance, business attraction and retention; and to increase the City\u2019s appropriations limit for Fiscal Years 2020-2024 by the amount of tax proceeds received by the increase, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3421, "fingerprint": "2019|201900020|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900020|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "201900020", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 602, "no_votes": 279, "total_votes": 881, "percent_yes": 68.33144154370035, "percent_no": 31.66855845629965, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer in Calave...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer in Calaveras from elected offices to appointed positions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.975794", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.472901", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3422, "fingerprint": "2019|201900003|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900003|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "44a76958a37dec32", "measure_id": "201900003", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall County of Contra Costa Ordinance No. 2019-02 be approved to authorize an increase in the special tax on property located in County Service Area P-5 by $140 per parcel, from a maximum of $792 to a maximum of $932 annually for parcels used for commercial recreational purposes, and from a maximum of $330 to a maximum of $470 annually for all other parcels, to provide additional funding for police protection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 485, "no_votes": 151, "total_votes": 636, "percent_yes": 76.25786163522012, "percent_no": 23.742138364779876, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized an increase in the special property tax in Contra Cos...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized an increase in the special property tax in Contra Costa County Service Area P-5 by $140 per parcel, raising the maximum annual tax to $932 for commercial recreational parcels and $470 for all other parcels to fund police protection services. The measure passed with 76.3% voter approval.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.976056", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.473090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall County of Contra Costa Ordinance No. 2019-02 be approved to authorize an increase in the special tax on property located in County Service Area P-5 by $140 per parcel, from a maximum of $792 to a maximum of $932 annually for parcels used for commercial recreational purposes, and from a maximum of $330 to a maximum of $470 annually for all other parcels, to provide additional funding for police protection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3424, "fingerprint": "2019|201900022|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900022|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ec71b8df6d5b7e24", "measure_id": "201900022", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain El Cerrito\u2019s quality of life, continuing local control of recreation services/parks, including maintaining/improving: swim center pools, locker rooms/restrooms; city parks, walking paths, playfields/open space; and program space for children, families, adults/seniors; shall a measure be adopted extending the 2000 voter approved measure, with no increase of the current $58.46 per single family residential unit or other rates, until repealed by voters, providing $650,000 annually, with all funds benefiting El Cerrito?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4591, "no_votes": 1269, "total_votes": 5860, "percent_yes": 78.34470989761093, "percent_no": 21.655290102389074, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends a previously approved property tax assessment of $58", "summary_text": "This measure extends a previously approved property tax assessment of $58.46 per single family residential unit to fund El Cerrito's recreation services and parks, including pools, parks, walking paths, and program spaces. The extension would continue indefinitely until repealed by voters, generating approximately $650,000 annually for the city's recreational facilities and programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.976620", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.473477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain El Cerrito\u2019s quality of life, continuing local control of recreation services/parks, including maintaining/improving: swim center pools, locker rooms/restrooms; city parks, walking paths, playfields/open space; and program space for children, families, adults/seniors; shall a measure be adopted extending the 2000 voter approved measure, with no increase of the current $58.46 per single family residential unit or other rates, until repealed by voters, providing $650,000 annually, with all funds benefiting El Cerrito?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3423, "fingerprint": "2019|201900021|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900021|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "cc3a96315303e1b4", "measure_id": "201900021", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative to Allow for Development of Residential Dwellings and Commercial/Civic Uses,\r\n and the Protection of Open Space, by amending the Urban Limit Line, the Brentwood General Plan, and Municipal Code; Adopting a New Specific Plan; Constructing Road Improvements; and Providing Funds for Public Facilities be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4334, "no_votes": 10863, "total_votes": 15197, "percent_yes": 28.51878660261894, "percent_no": 71.48121339738105, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended Brentwood's Urban Limit Line, General Plan, an...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended Brentwood's Urban Limit Line, General Plan, and Municipal Code to allow residential and commercial development in a specific area while also protecting open space. It would have adopted a new specific plan for the development, required road improvements, and provided funding for public facilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.976319", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.473284", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative to Allow for Development of Residential Dwellings and Commercial/Civic Uses,\r\n and the Protection of Open Space, by amending the Urban Limit Line, the Brentwood General Plan, and Municipal Code; Adopting a New Specific Plan; Constructing Road Improvements; and Providing Funds for Public Facilities be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3425, "fingerprint": "2019|201900705|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900705|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "4c8d80fefcb333cc", "measure_id": "201900705", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure all students receive a well-rounded, high quality education to prepare them for college, university and careers; maintain and prevent cuts in science, technology, music, art, honors and career/job training programs, shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District renew and increase its expiring parcel tax at the rate of $148 generating $5,600,000 annually for 9 years; requiring citizens oversight, independent audits, senior exemptions, and funds used in Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 292, "no_votes": 109, "total_votes": 401, "percent_yes": 72.81795511221945, "percent_no": 27.18204488778055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed and increased an expiring parcel tax in the Tahoe Trucke...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed and increased an expiring parcel tax in the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District to $148 per parcel, generating $5.6 million annually for nine years to fund educational programs including science, technology, music, art, honors, and career training. The measure included provisions for citizen oversight, independent audits, senior exemptions, and restricted the funds to use within the district.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.976886", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.473674", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure all students receive a well-rounded, high quality education to prepare them for college, university and careers; maintain and prevent cuts in science, technology, music, art, honors and career/job training programs, shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District renew and increase its expiring parcel tax at the rate of $148 generating $5,600,000 annually for 9 years; requiring citizens oversight, independent audits, senior exemptions, and funds used in Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3426, "fingerprint": "2019|201900023|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900023|FRESNO", "content_hash": "5b212ac237794064", "measure_id": "201900023", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect, maintain and improve essential City services including police, fire, 911 emergency, gang prevention programs, neighborhood police patrols, maintain streets, reduce criminal activity, attract and retain businesses and jobs, and maintain youth/senior and other programs and services, shall the City of Parlier increase the sales tax by one cent ($.01) providing for approximately $400,000 annually, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 276, "no_votes": 254, "total_votes": 530, "percent_yes": 52.075471698113205, "percent_no": 47.924528301886795, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased the sales tax in Parlier by one cent (1%) to generate a...", "summary_text": "The measure increased the sales tax in Parlier by one cent (1%) to generate approximately $400,000 annually for city services including police, fire, emergency services, street maintenance, and various community programs. The tax increase remains in effect until voters choose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.977179", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.473866", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect, maintain and improve essential City services including police, fire, 911 emergency, gang prevention programs, neighborhood police patrols, maintain streets, reduce criminal activity, attract and retain businesses and jobs, and maintain youth/senior and other programs and services, shall the City of Parlier increase the sales tax by one cent ($.01) providing for approximately $400,000 annually, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3427, "fingerprint": "2019|201900004|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900004|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "25d4ac09437eac05", "measure_id": "201900004", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Salton Community Services District be authorized to levy an annual special tax at the rate\r\n of $10.00 for unimproved real property, $75.00 for improved real property per taxable parcel within the District, for the purpose of providing funds for the District's Fire Department, and (ii) annual cost of living increases based on the Consumer Price Index for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, California, published by the Bureau Of Labor Statistics, United State Department Of Labor for all items not to exceed 3% for a period of ten fiscal years commencing 07/01/2020?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 152, "no_votes": 120, "total_votes": 272, "percent_yes": 55.88235294117647, "percent_no": 44.11764705882353, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Salton Community Services District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Salton Community Services District to levy an annual special tax of $10 for unimproved property and $75 for improved property per parcel to fund the district's fire department. The tax would have included annual cost-of-living increases up to 3% based on the Consumer Price Index for a ten-year period starting July 1, 2020.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.977474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.474059", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Salton Community Services District be authorized to levy an annual special tax at the rate\r\n of $10.00 for unimproved real property, $75.00 for improved real property per taxable parcel within the District, for the purpose of providing funds for the District's Fire Department, and (ii) annual cost of living increases based on the Consumer Price Index for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, California, published by the Bureau Of Labor Statistics, United State Department Of Labor for all items not to exceed 3% for a period of ten fiscal years commencing 07/01/2020?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3428, "fingerprint": "2019|201900005|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900005|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "3ecf94632c7e5106", "measure_id": "201900005", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Salton Community Services District be authorized to increase its California Constitution\r\n article XIII B appropriations limit by the amount of revenues received in each fiscal year from the special tax for Fire Protection Services approved by the voters for a period of four fiscal years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 154, "no_votes": 117, "total_votes": 271, "percent_yes": 56.82656826568265, "percent_no": 43.17343173431735, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Salton Community Services District to increase it...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Salton Community Services District to increase its constitutional spending limit by the amount of revenue collected from a voter-approved fire protection services tax for four fiscal years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.977741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.474253", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Salton Community Services District be authorized to increase its California Constitution\r\n article XIII B appropriations limit by the amount of revenues received in each fiscal year from the special tax for Fire Protection Services approved by the voters for a period of four fiscal years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11170, "fingerprint": "2019|201900041|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900041|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bc0ef528007069f2", "measure_id": "201900041", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, including to home break-ins and thefts;  neighborhood, school and park police patrols, fire/paramedic services, fire station operations, emergency preparedness; retain/attract local businesses; maintain streets/infrastructure; provide other general services and maintain City finances, shall the City of South Pasadena establish a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $1,500,000 annually until ended by voters, all funds remaining in South Pasadena?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2985, "no_votes": 1449, "total_votes": 4434, "percent_yes": 67.32070365358592, "percent_no": 32.67929634641408, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in South Pasadena to fund emergency services, police and fire operations, street maintenance, and other general city services, generating approximately $1.5 million annually. The tax remains in effect until voters decide to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.500233", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.982784", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.477820", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, including to home break-ins and thefts;  neighborhood, school and park police patrols, fire/paramedic services, fire station operations, emergency preparedness; retain/attract local businesses; maintain streets/infrastructure; provide other general services and maintain City finances, shall the City of South Pasadena establish a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $1,500,000 annually until ended by voters, all funds remaining in South Pasadena?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11168, "fingerprint": "2019|201900031|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900031|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c0096a98c2d7f490", "measure_id": "201900031", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, including to home break-ins and thefts;  neighborhood, school and park police patrols, fire/paramedic services, fire station operations, emergency preparedness; retain/attract local businesses; maintain streets/infrastructure; provide other general services and maintain City finances, shall the City of Arcadia establish a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $8,600,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring annual independent financial audits, all funds remaining in Arcadia?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4811, "no_votes": 2728, "total_votes": 7539, "percent_yes": 63.81482955299112, "percent_no": 36.18517044700888, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in Arcadia, California to fund emergency services, police and fire operations, infrastructure maintenance, and other general city services, generating approximately $8.6 million annually. The tax remains in effect until voters choose to end it and requires annual independent financial audits with all funds staying within the city.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-06-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.498342", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.979957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.475785", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, including to home break-ins and thefts;  neighborhood, school and park police patrols, fire/paramedic services, fire station operations, emergency preparedness; retain/attract local businesses; maintain streets/infrastructure; provide other general services and maintain City finances, shall the City of Arcadia establish a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $8,600,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring annual independent financial audits, all funds remaining in Arcadia?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3431, "fingerprint": "2019|201900026|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900026|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4843954d3daed763", "measure_id": "201900026", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund essential City services such as police patrols/crime prevention, fire, paramedic/9-1-1 emergency response, street maintenance, pothole repair, community facilities, infrastructure improvements/other general services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City's existing transient occupancy (hotel) tax paid by hotel/motel guests up to 14%, providing more than $1,000,000 annually for City services, until ended by voters, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, and all funds locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5186, "no_votes": 1588, "total_votes": 6774, "percent_yes": 76.55742545025096, "percent_no": 23.44257454974904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Los Angeles's transient occupancy tax on hotel and mot...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Los Angeles's transient occupancy tax on hotel and motel guests to up to 14% to generate over $1 million annually for general city services. The measure included provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits of the tax revenue.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.978566", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.474831", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund essential City services such as police patrols/crime prevention, fire, paramedic/9-1-1 emergency response, street maintenance, pothole repair, community facilities, infrastructure improvements/other general services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City's existing transient occupancy (hotel) tax paid by hotel/motel guests up to 14%, providing more than $1,000,000 annually for City services, until ended by voters, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, and all funds locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11169, "fingerprint": "2019|201900038|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900038|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "59b0b4a486041528", "measure_id": "201900038", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure, known as the HOSPITALITY WORKING CONDITIONS ORDINANCE, placed on the ballot by initiative petition, applicable to large hotels, golf courses and amusement parks, and which enacts a wage floor of $15/hour (CPI adjustments), limits daily work hours, limits daily square footage of rooms cleaned, requires panic-buttons for employees, requires maintenance of detailed compliance records, prohibits employer retaliation against employees, requires employee notices, and imposes fines and attorneys\u2019 fees for violation, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2325, "no_votes": 7739, "total_votes": 10064, "percent_yes": 23.10214626391097, "percent_no": 76.89785373608903, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established a $15/hour minimum wage with cost-of-livin...", "summary_text": "The measure would have established a $15/hour minimum wage with cost-of-living adjustments for workers at large hotels, golf courses, and amusement parks in Los Angeles, while also limiting daily work hours and room cleaning requirements, mandating panic buttons for employees, and imposing penalties for employer violations. The initiative failed with 23.1% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.499671", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.981920", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.477232", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure, known as the HOSPITALITY WORKING CONDITIONS ORDINANCE, placed on the ballot by initiative petition, applicable to large hotels, golf courses and amusement parks, and which enacts a wage floor of $15/hour (CPI adjustments), limits daily work hours, limits daily square footage of rooms cleaned, requires panic-buttons for employees, requires maintenance of detailed compliance records, prohibits employer retaliation against employees, requires employee notices, and imposes fines and attorneys\u2019 fees for violation, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3434, "fingerprint": "2019|201900029|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900029|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2344b5432d08be08", "measure_id": "201900029", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 18-5104 be adopted, approving a General Plan Amendment for the Arts Club Project at 8920 Sunset Boulevard, thereby allowing the project to proceed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3546, "no_votes": 2337, "total_votes": 5883, "percent_yes": 60.27536970933197, "percent_no": 39.72463029066803, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure approved a General Plan Amendment for the Arts Club Project at 89...", "summary_text": "The measure approved a General Plan Amendment for the Arts Club Project at 8920 Sunset Boulevard in Los Angeles, allowing the project to move forward.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.979429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.475403", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 18-5104 be adopted, approving a General Plan Amendment for the Arts Club Project at 8920 Sunset Boulevard, thereby allowing the project to proceed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11171, "fingerprint": "2019|201900042|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900042|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201900042", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2610, "no_votes": 1704, "total_votes": 4314, "percent_yes": 60.50069541029208, "percent_no": 39.49930458970792, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.500418", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.983082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.478016", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3430, "fingerprint": "2019|201900025|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900025|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "de88042ad77534b9", "measure_id": "201900025", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Huntington Park take all reasonable and necessary steps to negotiate with Costco for a store location in Huntington Park, which could include land use, zoning, economic and financial incentives, or other concessions, with the revenues generated from the Costco store to be used to preserve police and public safety services, community programs, youth and after-school parks and recreation services, and improving City parks, fixing City streets and public infrastructure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1899, "no_votes": 304, "total_votes": 2203, "percent_yes": 86.20063549704949, "percent_no": 13.79936450295051, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the City of Huntington Park to negotiate with ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the City of Huntington Park to negotiate with Costco for a store location, potentially offering various incentives including land use, zoning, and financial concessions. Revenues from the Costco store would be designated for police and public safety services, community programs, youth services, parks and recreation, and infrastructure improvements.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.978270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.474640", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Huntington Park take all reasonable and necessary steps to negotiate with Costco for a store location in Huntington Park, which could include land use, zoning, economic and financial incentives, or other concessions, with the revenues generated from the Costco store to be used to preserve police and public safety services, community programs, youth and after-school parks and recreation services, and improving City parks, fixing City streets and public infrastructure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3437, "fingerprint": "2019|201900033|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900033|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201900033", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2463, "no_votes": 1235, "total_votes": 3698, "percent_yes": 66.60356949702542, "percent_no": 33.39643050297458, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.980601", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.476183", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3436, "fingerprint": "2019|201900032|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900032|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a6e85eff4870ea6a", "measure_id": "201900032", "measure_letter": "CR", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure providing general revenue to: maintain existing City services including public safety, youth/senior programs and special events; repair and replace infrastructure and facilities; maintain right-of-way landscaping, parks, and trees; address rising operational costs; restore reserves and improve the financial health of the City, by setting a permanent three-quarter cent (0.75%) transactions (sales) and use tax, resulting in approximately $2,500,000 annually, for Claremont services, programs, and projects, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3870, "no_votes": 4011, "total_votes": 7881, "percent_yes": 49.10544347164065, "percent_no": 50.89455652835935, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a permanent 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a permanent 0.75% sales tax in Claremont to generate approximately $2.5 million annually for general city revenue. The funds would have supported city services, infrastructure maintenance, parks, and operational costs without being restricted to specific programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.980309", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.475990", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure providing general revenue to: maintain existing City services including public safety, youth/senior programs and special events; repair and replace infrastructure and facilities; maintain right-of-way landscaping, parks, and trees; address rising operational costs; restore reserves and improve the financial health of the City, by setting a permanent three-quarter cent (0.75%) transactions (sales) and use tax, resulting in approximately $2,500,000 annually, for Claremont services, programs, and projects, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3429, "fingerprint": "2019|201900024|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900024|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5c168358c6361f46", "measure_id": "201900024", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain existing City services including public safety, youth/adult programs, fix streets/potholes, address quality of life issues, maintain library services, address rising pension costs, implement technology projects, and improve the financial health of the City, shall the Measure be adopted approving an ordinance enacting a three-quarters percent (0.75%) transactions and use tax providing approximately $5,000,000 annually in general revenue, to be levied until ended by the voters with all funds staying local, for Glendora?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3524, "no_votes": 3042, "total_votes": 6566, "percent_yes": 53.67042339323789, "percent_no": 46.32957660676211, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.75% sales tax in Glendora, California to generate approximately $5 million annually in general revenue for city services including public safety, street repairs, libraries, and pension costs. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters, with all funds staying within the city.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.978005", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.474448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain existing City services including public safety, youth/adult programs, fix streets/potholes, address quality of life issues, maintain library services, address rising pension costs, implement technology projects, and improve the financial health of the City, shall the Measure be adopted approving an ordinance enacting a three-quarters percent (0.75%) transactions and use tax providing approximately $5,000,000 annually in general revenue, to be levied until ended by the voters with all funds staying local, for Glendora?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3445, "fingerprint": "2019|201900062|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900062|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8596115c9c1fc8ef", "measure_id": "201900062", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain/attract quality teachers; reduce class sizes; provide counseling/nursing/library services, arts, music, science, math, preschool, vocational/career education, safe/well-maintained schools, adequate instructional materials/supplies; support disadvantaged/homeless students; shall Los Angeles Unified School District levy $0.16 per square foot of building improvements annually, exempting seniors/certain disability recipients, providing approximately $500,000,000 annually for 12 years, requiring annual audits, oversight, and funding local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 181329, "no_votes": 211434, "total_votes": 392763, "percent_yes": 46.16753614775322, "percent_no": 53.83246385224678, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Los Angeles Unified School District to ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Los Angeles Unified School District to levy an annual tax of $0.16 per square foot on building improvements to fund various educational programs and services, generating approximately $500 million annually for 12 years. The tax would have exempted seniors and certain disability recipients and required annual audits and oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-06-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.983647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.478402", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain/attract quality teachers; reduce class sizes; provide counseling/nursing/library services, arts, music, science, math, preschool, vocational/career education, safe/well-maintained schools, adequate instructional materials/supplies; support disadvantaged/homeless students; shall Los Angeles Unified School District levy $0.16 per square foot of building improvements annually, exempting seniors/certain disability recipients, providing approximately $500,000,000 annually for 12 years, requiring annual audits, oversight, and funding local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3438, "fingerprint": "2019|201900034|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900034|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0b5e1e811f98a317", "measure_id": "201900034", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the transient occupancy tax (hotel bed tax) paid by hotel/motel guests from 12% to 14% of room revenue raising approximately $550,000 annually to be controlled and used locally for general municipal services in Hermosa Beach such as police, fire, and paramedic services, infrastructure/street repairs, and park upgrades, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3067, "no_votes": 868, "total_votes": 3935, "percent_yes": 77.94155019059721, "percent_no": 22.058449809402788, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax (hotel bed tax) in Hermosa...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax (hotel bed tax) in Hermosa Beach from 12% to 14% of room revenue, generating approximately $550,000 annually for general municipal services including police, fire, paramedic services, infrastructure repairs, and park upgrades.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.980868", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.476374", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the transient occupancy tax (hotel bed tax) paid by hotel/motel guests from 12% to 14% of room revenue raising approximately $550,000 annually to be controlled and used locally for general municipal services in Hermosa Beach such as police, fire, and paramedic services, infrastructure/street repairs, and park upgrades, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3439, "fingerprint": "2019|201900035|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900035|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d55dcfcaf81aa9d6", "measure_id": "201900035", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City of Irwindale service levels including local police protection, 911 emergency  response, public safety, senior citizen/park/transportation/recreation programs; maintain library services, and programs that create jobs/attract local businesses; fix potholes/streets; and other general City services; shall the measure enacting a three-quarters percent transactions and use sales tax to be levied annually to generate an estimated $1,180,000 until ended by voters be adopted requiring an ordinance, and funds only for Irwindale?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117, "no_votes": 76, "total_votes": 193, "percent_yes": 60.62176165803109, "percent_no": 39.37823834196891, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "The measure enacted a 0.75% sales tax in Irwindale to generate approximately $1,180,000 annually for general city services including police, emergency response, parks, libraries, street repairs, and economic development programs. The tax continues until ended by voters and funds can only be used within Irwindale.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.981130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.476650", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City of Irwindale service levels including local police protection, 911 emergency  response, public safety, senior citizen/park/transportation/recreation programs; maintain library services, and programs that create jobs/attract local businesses; fix potholes/streets; and other general City services; shall the measure enacting a three-quarters percent transactions and use sales tax to be levied annually to generate an estimated $1,180,000 until ended by voters be adopted requiring an ordinance, and funds only for Irwindale?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3441, "fingerprint": "2019|201900037|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900037|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5a4e981cc236c7a2", "measure_id": "201900037", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To keep local sales tax dollars in Monrovia to fund general city services, including community center improvements, police, fire, 911, senior services, parks, recreation, clean water and others, shall the Monrovia Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance of 2019, placed on the ballot by the City Council, be approved, imposing a 0.75% transactions and use (sales) tax to collect approximately $4.5 million annually spent only in Monrovia, with a Citizens Advisory Committee and annual spending plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2803, "no_votes": 1621, "total_votes": 4424, "percent_yes": 63.35895117540687, "percent_no": 36.64104882459313, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a 0", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a 0.75% local sales tax in Monrovia to fund general city services including police, fire, parks, senior services, and community center improvements, generating approximately $4.5 million annually. The measure also established a Citizens Advisory Committee to oversee spending and required annual spending plans.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.981652", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.477037", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep local sales tax dollars in Monrovia to fund general city services, including community center improvements, police, fire, 911, senior services, parks, recreation, clean water and others, shall the Monrovia Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance of 2019, placed on the ballot by the City Council, be approved, imposing a 0.75% transactions and use (sales) tax to collect approximately $4.5 million annually spent only in Monrovia, with a Citizens Advisory Committee and annual spending plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3432, "fingerprint": "2019|201900027|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900027|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a79efb5be318cf78", "measure_id": "201900027", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, amending the City Charter to change the City's General Municipal Election date to the Statewide Primary Election date of the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of even-numbered years (from current date of the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of odd-numbered years), commencing on March 8, 2022, and as a consequence extending one-time councilmember terms by one year, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 646, "no_votes": 485, "total_votes": 1131, "percent_yes": 57.11759504862953, "percent_no": 42.88240495137047, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed Los Angeles's municipal elections from odd-numbered year...", "summary_text": "This measure changed Los Angeles's municipal elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years, moving them to coincide with statewide primary elections starting in March 2022. The change resulted in a one-time extension of councilmember terms by one year to align with the new election schedule.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.978905", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.475022", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, amending the City Charter to change the City's General Municipal Election date to the Statewide Primary Election date of the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of even-numbered years (from current date of the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of odd-numbered years), commencing on March 8, 2022, and as a consequence extending one-time councilmember terms by one year, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3433, "fingerprint": "2019|201900028|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900028|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4723195840d209f4", "measure_id": "201900028", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, amending the City Charter to change the City's General Municipal Election date  to the Statewide General Election date of the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of even-numbered years (from current date of the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of odd-numbered years), commencing on November 3, 2020, and as a consequence reducing one-time councilmember terms by four months, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 805, "no_votes": 341, "total_votes": 1146, "percent_yes": 70.24432809773124, "percent_no": 29.75567190226876, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to move the city's general ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to move the city's general municipal elections from March of odd-numbered years to November of even-numbered years, aligning them with statewide general elections. The change began with the November 3, 2020 election and resulted in a one-time reduction of four months for some councilmember terms.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.979168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.475212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, amending the City Charter to change the City's General Municipal Election date  to the Statewide General Election date of the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of even-numbered years (from current date of the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of odd-numbered years), commencing on November 3, 2020, and as a consequence reducing one-time councilmember terms by four months, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3440, "fingerprint": "2019|201900036|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900036|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1b22723e6c66bc08", "measure_id": "201900036", "measure_letter": "PS", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect and maintain vital city police services, fire protection, street and pothole repair, parks and recreation programs; and other essential services, shall the City of Lynwood remove the 10 year sunset provision from the existing one cent sales and use tax? All funds remain in Lynwood.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1384, "no_votes": 431, "total_votes": 1815, "percent_yes": 76.2534435261708, "percent_no": 23.7465564738292, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure removed the 10-year sunset provision from Lynwood's existing one...", "summary_text": "This measure removed the 10-year sunset provision from Lynwood's existing one-cent sales tax, making the tax permanent rather than expiring after a set time period. The tax revenue is designated for police services, fire protection, street repair, parks and recreation programs, and other city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.981390", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.476846", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect and maintain vital city police services, fire protection, street and pothole repair, parks and recreation programs; and other essential services, shall the City of Lynwood remove the 10 year sunset provision from the existing one cent sales and use tax? All funds remain in Lynwood.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3444, "fingerprint": "2019|201900061|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900061|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c25ea0105a45fac1", "measure_id": "201900061", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to continue funding quality educational programs and classroom instruction, limit certain size increases and teaching position reductions, attract and retain high quality teachers and employees, and support educational programs that enhance student achievement, shall San Marino Unified School District extend its expiring school parcel tax for six years at $366 per parcel, collecting approximately $1.6 million annually with exemptions for seniors, adjustment for inflation and all money staying in our community to benefit our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1806, "no_votes": 803, "total_votes": 2609, "percent_yes": 69.22192410885397, "percent_no": 30.77807589114603, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends San Marino Unified School District's existing parcel tax...", "summary_text": "This measure extends San Marino Unified School District's existing parcel tax for six years at $366 per parcel, generating approximately $1.6 million annually for educational programs and staff. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and allows for inflation adjustments, with all revenue staying within the local district.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-02-26", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.983384", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.478206", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to continue funding quality educational programs and classroom instruction, limit certain size increases and teaching position reductions, attract and retain high quality teachers and employees, and support educational programs that enhance student achievement, shall San Marino Unified School District extend its expiring school parcel tax for six years at $366 per parcel, collecting approximately $1.6 million annually with exemptions for seniors, adjustment for inflation and all money staying in our community to benefit our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3443, "fingerprint": "2019|201900040|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900040|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f5b42ece5e025a6a", "measure_id": "201900040", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain police, fire and paramedic response times; maintain police patrols, emergency planning and response; provide for parks, streets, sidewalks and parkway trees, library services, recreation programs, senior programs, and general finances, shall the City of Sierra Madre establish a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $225,000 annually with all revenue remaining in Sierra Madre for the benefit of its residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1975, "no_votes": 466, "total_votes": 2441, "percent_yes": 80.9094633346989, "percent_no": 19.0905366653011, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75-cent sales tax in Sierra Madre to fund police, fire, paramedic services, parks, streets, libraries, recreation programs, and other city services, generating approximately $225,000 annually. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters and all revenue stays within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.982516", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.477623", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain police, fire and paramedic response times; maintain police patrols, emergency planning and response; provide for parks, streets, sidewalks and parkway trees, library services, recreation programs, senior programs, and general finances, shall the City of Sierra Madre establish a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $225,000 annually with all revenue remaining in Sierra Madre for the benefit of its residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3442, "fingerprint": "2019|201900039|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900039|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "40cf024668a36a88", "measure_id": "201900039", "measure_letter": "SM", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure approving an ordinance to continue the Special Public Safety Tax for Paramedic Services, Fire Protection and Prevention and Police Protection in San Marino, providing approximately $3.4 million annually until 2025, continuing the existing rate structure calculating the maximum amount charged to each parcel type based primarily on its zoning and applying police, fire, and paramedic cost components specified in the exhibit to the ordinance, with increases strictly limited each year, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1664, "no_votes": 678, "total_votes": 2342, "percent_yes": 71.05038428693425, "percent_no": 28.949615713065754, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure continues San Marino's existing Special Public Safety Tax for par...", "summary_text": "The measure continues San Marino's existing Special Public Safety Tax for paramedic services, fire protection, and police protection, providing approximately $3.4 million annually until 2025. The tax maintains the current rate structure based on property zoning with annual increases strictly limited.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.982220", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.477433", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure approving an ordinance to continue the Special Public Safety Tax for Paramedic Services, Fire Protection and Prevention and Police Protection in San Marino, providing approximately $3.4 million annually until 2025, continuing the existing rate structure calculating the maximum amount charged to each parcel type based primarily on its zoning and applying police, fire, and paramedic cost components specified in the exhibit to the ordinance, with increases strictly limited each year, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3435, "fingerprint": "2019|201900030|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900030|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2b5559dbe5b7d500", "measure_id": "201900030", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a Cannabis Business Tax on gross receipts from the sale of adult-use cannabis and adult-use cannabis products, at a rate of 7.5%, estimated to raise $5,500,000 annually to be used locally to fund general municipal services in West Hollywood such as public safety, street repair, homeless services, pedestrian/bike safety, and parks, until ended by voters and subject to annual public review of spending and independent financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4541, "no_votes": 1410, "total_votes": 5951, "percent_yes": 76.30650310872123, "percent_no": 23.69349689127877, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a 7", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a 7.5% tax on gross receipts from adult-use cannabis sales in West Hollywood, estimated to generate $5.5 million annually for general municipal services including public safety, street repair, homeless services, pedestrian/bike safety, and parks. The tax includes provisions for annual public spending reviews and independent financial audits, and can be ended by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.979691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.475593", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a Cannabis Business Tax on gross receipts from the sale of adult-use cannabis and adult-use cannabis products, at a rate of 7.5%, estimated to raise $5,500,000 annually to be used locally to fund general municipal services in West Hollywood such as public safety, street repair, homeless services, pedestrian/bike safety, and parks, until ended by voters and subject to annual public review of spending and independent financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3449, "fingerprint": "2019|201900063|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900063|MARIN", "content_hash": "f1d32672d1607af2", "measure_id": "201900063", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Given the current parcel tax of $300.00 will expire on June 30, 2020, shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District continue funding quality educational programs by levying a special tax assessment of $318.00 per year per assessor\u2019s parcel for a limited period of five (5) years with an exemption for any beneficial owner of a parcel who has attained the age of 65 on or before May 1 of any applicable year, who uses that parcel as his or her principal residence?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 401, "no_votes": 142, "total_votes": 543, "percent_yes": 73.84898710865562, "percent_no": 26.15101289134438, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues funding for the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District ...", "summary_text": "This measure continues funding for the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District by replacing an expiring $300 annual parcel tax with a $318 annual parcel tax for five years. The tax includes an exemption for residents age 65 and older who use their parcel as their primary residence.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-08-27", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.984817", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.479191", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Given the current parcel tax of $300.00 will expire on June 30, 2020, shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District continue funding quality educational programs by levying a special tax assessment of $318.00 per year per assessor\u2019s parcel for a limited period of five (5) years with an exemption for any beneficial owner of a parcel who has attained the age of 65 on or before May 1 of any applicable year, who uses that parcel as his or her principal residence?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3446, "fingerprint": "2019|201900006|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900006|MARIN", "content_hash": "27f03c002a391254", "measure_id": "201900006", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Inverness Permanent Road Division No. 2 impose a special tax on parcels within the Division\r\n of $1,417 per improved parcel and $708 per unimproved parcel per year for 10 years and thereafter assess on all parcels $400 per year for ongoing maintenance, with a provision for an annual increase effective July 1 in accordance with the change in the State of California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the previous calendar year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 21, "percent_yes": 95.23809523809524, "percent_no": 4.761904761904759, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a special tax on parcels within Inverness Permanent Road...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a special tax on parcels within Inverness Permanent Road Division No. 2 of $1,417 per improved parcel and $708 per unimproved parcel annually for 10 years, followed by a $400 annual assessment for ongoing maintenance with annual cost-of-living adjustments. The tax is intended to fund road improvements and maintenance within the division.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-08-27", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.983908", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.478596", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Inverness Permanent Road Division No. 2 impose a special tax on parcels within the Division\r\n of $1,417 per improved parcel and $708 per unimproved parcel per year for 10 years and thereafter assess on all parcels $400 per year for ongoing maintenance, with a provision for an annual increase effective July 1 in accordance with the change in the State of California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the previous calendar year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3450, "fingerprint": "2019|201900064|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900064|MARIN", "content_hash": "036088e56a23b665", "measure_id": "201900064", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent academic programs and high-quality, 21st-century education by  attracting and retaining highly qualified, experienced teachers; maintaining and enhancing science, technology, engineering and math for all grades; supporting art, music and library programs; minimizing class size increases; shall a Reed Union School District measure be adopted renewing the existing $589 annual parcel tax, providing $2.5 million annually, for 12 years, with senior exemptions, 3% annual adjustments, no money for administrator salaries and funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2825, "no_votes": 950, "total_votes": 3775, "percent_yes": 74.83443708609272, "percent_no": 25.16556291390728, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing $589 annual parcel tax in the Reed Union Sch...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing $589 annual parcel tax in the Reed Union School District for 12 years, generating $2.5 million annually for educational programs including STEM, arts, music, and libraries, with exemptions for seniors and 3% annual adjustments. The measure prohibits using funds for administrator salaries and requires all money to stay within the local district.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.985091", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.479394", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent academic programs and high-quality, 21st-century education by  attracting and retaining highly qualified, experienced teachers; maintaining and enhancing science, technology, engineering and math for all grades; supporting art, music and library programs; minimizing class size increases; shall a Reed Union School District measure be adopted renewing the existing $589 annual parcel tax, providing $2.5 million annually, for 12 years, with senior exemptions, 3% annual adjustments, no money for administrator salaries and funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3447, "fingerprint": "2019|201900043|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900043|MARIN", "content_hash": "a31c6cc17e92ebbf", "measure_id": "201900043", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted approving an eleven-year extension of Fairfax\u2019s special municipal  services tax of $195 in the first year and increasing $5 annually to a maximum of $250 for each business occupancy and dwelling unit, raising approximately $711,000 to $912,500 annually, to: Keep our local Police Station open 24/7; Maintain/enhance local Fire services and wildfire prevention efforts; Fund Public Works/safety projects; Maintain Youth/Senior programs; Continue the Citizens Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2052, "no_votes": 491, "total_votes": 2543, "percent_yes": 80.69209594966576, "percent_no": 19.307904050334244, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extends Fairfax's municipal services tax for eleven years, start...", "summary_text": "This measure extends Fairfax's municipal services tax for eleven years, starting at $195 per business and dwelling unit in the first year and increasing by $5 annually to a maximum of $250, raising approximately $711,000 to $912,500 annually. The revenue funds police station operations, fire services, wildfire prevention, public works projects, youth and senior programs, and continues citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.984234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.478788", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted approving an eleven-year extension of Fairfax\u2019s special municipal  services tax of $195 in the first year and increasing $5 annually to a maximum of $250 for each business occupancy and dwelling unit, raising approximately $711,000 to $912,500 annually, to: Keep our local Police Station open 24/7; Maintain/enhance local Fire services and wildfire prevention efforts; Fund Public Works/safety projects; Maintain Youth/Senior programs; Continue the Citizens Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3448, "fingerprint": "2019|201900044|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900044|MARIN", "content_hash": "2d4d2f23f5930645", "measure_id": "201900044", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To restore and provide ongoing maintenance of 93-year-old Memorial Park, including replacing/repairing fields and playground equipment for safety, installing drainage, irrigation systems and new restrooms, improving senior accessibility with safe walkways, providing picnic areas, benches and shade trees, shall the Town of San Anselmo\u2019s measure authorizing an annual tax of $98 per residential unit, with a senior discount, or per 1,500 square feet of non-residential use, providing approximately $500,000 annually for 30 years, with independent oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2686, "no_votes": 1731, "total_votes": 4417, "percent_yes": 60.81050486755717, "percent_no": 39.18949513244283, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized an annual property tax of $98 per resident...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized an annual property tax of $98 per residential unit (with a senior discount) or per 1,500 square feet of non-residential use in San Anselmo to fund restoration and maintenance of Memorial Park, including repairs to fields and playground equipment, new drainage and irrigation systems, restrooms, walkways, and other improvements. The tax would have generated approximately $500,000 annually for 30 years with independent oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.984545", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.478990", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore and provide ongoing maintenance of 93-year-old Memorial Park, including replacing/repairing fields and playground equipment for safety, installing drainage, irrigation systems and new restrooms, improving senior accessibility with safe walkways, providing picnic areas, benches and shade trees, shall the Town of San Anselmo\u2019s measure authorizing an annual tax of $98 per residential unit, with a senior discount, or per 1,500 square feet of non-residential use, providing approximately $500,000 annually for 30 years, with independent oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3451, "fingerprint": "2019|201900045|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900045|NAPA", "content_hash": "d0ce410e4d7a8003", "measure_id": "201900045", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2018-9 be adopted to 1) establish a rent stabilization program for St. Helena mobile home park residents who opt into the program by signing a lease of twelve months or less; 2) provide mobile home park owners a just and reasonable return on investment; and 3) create a dispute resolution process for the park owner and residents if the owner proposes an annual rent increase that is above the permissible limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 594, "no_votes": 882, "total_votes": 1476, "percent_yes": 40.2439024390244, "percent_no": 59.7560975609756, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would have established a rent stabilization program for St", "summary_text": "This ordinance would have established a rent stabilization program for St. Helena mobile home park residents with leases of twelve months or less, limiting annual rent increases while ensuring park owners receive reasonable returns on investment. It would have also created a dispute resolution process for cases where proposed rent increases exceed the permitted limits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-06-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.985364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.479589", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2018-9 be adopted to 1) establish a rent stabilization program for St. Helena mobile home park residents who opt into the program by signing a lease of twelve months or less; 2) provide mobile home park owners a just and reasonable return on investment; and 3) create a dispute resolution process for the park owner and residents if the owner proposes an annual rent increase that is above the permissible limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3452, "fingerprint": "2019|201900046|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900046|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b22f535b60f5b0be", "measure_id": "201900046", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve general City services, such as police, fire and emergency response, parks and youth/senior services, and street repair, shall a measure enacting a tax on cannabis or hemp businesses up to $ 12.00 per square foot for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis or hemp businesses, generating approximately $1,000,000 - $1,400,000 annually, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2003, "no_votes": 1000, "total_votes": 3003, "percent_yes": 66.6999666999667, "percent_no": 33.300033300033306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a tax on cannabis and hemp businesses in Orange, Califor...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a tax on cannabis and hemp businesses in Orange, California, with rates up to $12 per square foot for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis businesses. The tax was projected to generate approximately $1-1.4 million annually for general city services including police, fire, parks, and street repair.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.985683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.479780", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve general City services, such as police, fire and emergency response, parks and youth/senior services, and street repair, shall a measure enacting a tax on cannabis or hemp businesses up to $ 12.00 per square foot for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis or hemp businesses, generating approximately $1,000,000 - $1,400,000 annually, until ended by voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3453, "fingerprint": "2019|201900047|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900047|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1a72d8b103af062f", "measure_id": "201900047", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve essential Stanton public services including emergency paramedic repsonse and fire protection, police patrolling homelessness and preventing burglaries, housing affordability programs and other City services, shall a measure amending the Stanton Municipal Code to increase the hotle/motel visitor tax from 8% to 12% be applied to hotel/motel guests, including visitors booking online, providing approximatley $250,000 annually, with audits, and all funds used locally, be adopted.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1916, "no_votes": 1095, "total_votes": 3011, "percent_yes": 63.63334440385254, "percent_no": 36.36665559614746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Stanton's hotel/motel visitor tax from 8% to 12%, appl...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Stanton's hotel/motel visitor tax from 8% to 12%, applying to all hotel/motel guests including those booking online. The tax increase was expected to generate approximately $250,000 annually for city services with required audits and local fund usage.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.985977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.479979", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve essential Stanton public services including emergency paramedic repsonse and fire protection, police patrolling homelessness and preventing burglaries, housing affordability programs and other City services, shall a measure amending the Stanton Municipal Code to increase the hotle/motel visitor tax from 8% to 12% be applied to hotel/motel guests, including visitors booking online, providing approximatley $250,000 annually, with audits, and all funds used locally, be adopted.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3454, "fingerprint": "2019|201900048|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900048|PLACER", "content_hash": "1387835dc5f75a63", "measure_id": "201900048", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 275, which rezones the Village at Loomis property, adopts a Preliminary Development Plan, and approves Development Standards for the project, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 796, "no_votes": 1503, "total_votes": 2299, "percent_yes": 34.62374945628534, "percent_no": 65.37625054371466, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have rezoned property known as \"the Village at Loomis,\" ado...", "summary_text": "The measure would have rezoned property known as \"the Village at Loomis,\" adopted a preliminary development plan, and approved development standards for the project through Ordinance 275.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-06-18", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.986238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.480175", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 275, which rezones the Village at Loomis property, adopts a Preliminary Development Plan, and approves Development Standards for the project, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3455, "fingerprint": "2019|201900049|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900049|PLACER", "content_hash": "7baa9ab6a5c241b0", "measure_id": "201900049", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 276, which approves a Development Agreement for the Village at Loomis project, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 790, "no_votes": 1505, "total_votes": 2295, "percent_yes": 34.42265795206972, "percent_no": 65.57734204793027, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance would approve a development agreement for the Village at Loomis...", "summary_text": "The ordinance would approve a development agreement for the Village at Loomis project in Placer County. The measure would authorize the specific development project to proceed under the terms of the proposed agreement.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-06-18", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.986502", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.480372", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 276, which approves a Development Agreement for the Village at Loomis project, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3456, "fingerprint": "2019|201900007|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900007|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "41a702824923c23e", "measure_id": "201900007", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Upon a two-thirds vote of approval, shall a special tax, replacing the current special tax of $195.00  per year which will expire on June 30, 2019, be imposed for a period of four (4) years starting July 1, 2019 for the specific purpose of emergency medical response, fire protection and prevention and hazardous materials response, and shall this tax be authorized in the amount of $198.00 per year, with optional annual adjustments not exceeding two percent (2%), on each parcel of real property or condominium unit within the District, excluding those parcels exempt from property tax and the following parcel numbers: 108-010-004, 108-101-008, 108-101-015, 108-010-016, 108-010-017, 108-010-021, 108-010-023, 108-053-006, 108-053-007, 108-090-002, 108-141-001,108-211-008, 108-283-004, 108-232-001, 108-241-003, 108-320-009, 108-320-035, 108-320-042, and 108-060-011, said tax to be collected along with the Plumas County property taxes, and shall the District appropriations limit (spending limit) be raised by the amount of the annual proceeds from this special tax for the period this tax is in effect, which revenue shall be deposited into a specifically created account on which an annual report shall be made as required by Government Code Section 50075.3?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126, "no_votes": 20, "total_votes": 146, "percent_yes": 86.3013698630137, "percent_no": 13.698630136986296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure replaces an expiring $195 annual special tax with a new $198 ann...", "summary_text": "This measure replaces an expiring $195 annual special tax with a new $198 annual special tax (with optional 2% annual adjustments) on property parcels in Plumas for four years to fund emergency medical response, fire protection and prevention, and hazardous materials response. The measure also raises the district's spending limit by the amount of annual tax proceeds and requires the revenue to be deposited in a specific account with annual reporting.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.986765", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.480562", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Upon a two-thirds vote of approval, shall a special tax, replacing the current special tax of $195.00  per year which will expire on June 30, 2019, be imposed for a period of four (4) years starting July 1, 2019 for the specific purpose of emergency medical response, fire protection and prevention and hazardous materials response, and shall this tax be authorized in the amount of $198.00 per year, with optional annual adjustments not exceeding two percent (2%), on each parcel of real property or condominium unit within the District, excluding those parcels exempt from property tax and the following parcel numbers: 108-010-004, 108-101-008, 108-101-015, 108-010-016, 108-010-017, 108-010-021, 108-010-023, 108-053-006, 108-053-007, 108-090-002, 108-141-001,108-211-008, 108-283-004, 108-232-001, 108-241-003, 108-320-009, 108-320-035, 108-320-042, and 108-060-011, said tax to be collected along with the Plumas County property taxes, and shall the District appropriations limit (spending limit) be raised by the amount of the annual proceeds from this special tax for the period this tax is in effect, which revenue shall be deposited into a specifically created account on which an annual report shall be made as required by Government Code Section 50075.3?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3457, "fingerprint": "2019|201900050|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900050|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1d3f3101f9db898a", "measure_id": "201900050", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the proposed ordinance adding a Specific Plan Overlay and amending the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) to allow a state-licensed residential care facility of up to 99 beds for those in need of assisted living in the ER-2 (Estate Residential-2) Zone at 959 Genevieve Street be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1625, "no_votes": 1727, "total_votes": 3352, "percent_yes": 48.47852028639618, "percent_no": 51.52147971360382, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have amended Solana Beach's municipal code to allow...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have amended Solana Beach's municipal code to allow a state-licensed assisted living facility of up to 99 beds to be built in a residential zone at 959 Genevieve Street. The measure failed with 48.5% support.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.987060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.480760", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the proposed ordinance adding a Specific Plan Overlay and amending the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) to allow a state-licensed residential care facility of up to 99 beds for those in need of assisted living in the ER-2 (Estate Residential-2) Zone at 959 Genevieve Street be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3458, "fingerprint": "2019|201900008|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900008|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "db2f753ffe1f5c6f", "measure_id": "201900008", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To finance the construction, development, acquisition, and preservation of housing affordable to extremely-low, low and middle-income households through programs that will prioritize vulnerable populations such as San Francisco\u2019s working families, veterans, seniors, and persons with disabilities; to assist in the acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of existing affordable housing to prevent the displacement of residents; to repair and reconstruct distressed and dilapidated public housing developments and their underlying infrastructure; to assist the City\u2019s middle-income residents or workers in obtaining affordable rental or home ownership opportunities including down payment assistance and support for new construction of affordable housing for San Francisco Unified School District and City College of San Francisco employees; and to pay related costs; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $600,000,000 in general obligation bonds with a duration of up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.019/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of $50,000,000, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143055, "no_votes": 57974, "total_votes": 201029, "percent_yes": 71.16137472702944, "percent_no": 28.83862527297056, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized San Francisco to issue $600 million in general obliga...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized San Francisco to issue $600 million in general obligation bonds to finance affordable housing construction, acquisition, and preservation for extremely-low to middle-income households, as well as repair public housing and provide homeownership assistance. The bonds have a 30-year duration and are funded through property taxes at an estimated rate of $0.019 per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.987412", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.480952", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance the construction, development, acquisition, and preservation of housing affordable to extremely-low, low and middle-income households through programs that will prioritize vulnerable populations such as San Francisco\u2019s working families, veterans, seniors, and persons with disabilities; to assist in the acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of existing affordable housing to prevent the displacement of residents; to repair and reconstruct distressed and dilapidated public housing developments and their underlying infrastructure; to assist the City\u2019s middle-income residents or workers in obtaining affordable rental or home ownership opportunities including down payment assistance and support for new construction of affordable housing for San Francisco Unified School District and City College of San Francisco employees; and to pay related costs; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $600,000,000 in general obligation bonds with a duration of up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.019/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of $50,000,000, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3459, "fingerprint": "2019|201900009|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900009|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2c21bd86b7712294", "measure_id": "201900009", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to change the name of the Department of Aging and Adult Services to the Department of Disability and Aging Services; to change the name of the Aging and Adult Services Commission to the Disability and Aging Services Commission; and to add new qualifications for three of the seven seats on this Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 152456, "no_votes": 41775, "total_votes": 194231, "percent_yes": 78.49210476185573, "percent_no": 21.507895238144272, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the name of the Department of Aging and Adult Services t...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the name of the Department of Aging and Adult Services to the Department of Disability and Aging Services, renamed the corresponding commission, and established new qualifications for three of the seven commission seats.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.987731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.481160", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to change the name of the Department of Aging and Adult Services to the Department of Disability and Aging Services; to change the name of the Aging and Adult Services Commission to the Disability and Aging Services Commission; and to add new qualifications for three of the seven seats on this Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3460, "fingerprint": "2019|201900010|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900010|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "5ff2ef7cb182cd9d", "measure_id": "201900010", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City overturn the law passed by the Board of Supervisors suspending the sale of electronic cigarettes until they receive FDA authorization, and adopt new regulations on the sale, manufacture, distribution and advertising of electronic cigarettes in San Francisco?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36666, "no_votes": 164885, "total_votes": 201551, "percent_yes": 18.19192164762268, "percent_no": 81.80807835237732, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have overturned San Francisco's ban on electronic cigarett...", "summary_text": "This measure would have overturned San Francisco's ban on electronic cigarette sales pending FDA authorization and instead implemented new regulations on the sale, manufacture, distribution and advertising of e-cigarettes in the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.988027", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.481357", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City overturn the law passed by the Board of Supervisors suspending the sale of electronic cigarettes until they receive FDA authorization, and adopt new regulations on the sale, manufacture, distribution and advertising of electronic cigarettes in San Francisco?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3461, "fingerprint": "2019|201900011|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900011|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2567bd1a131cd241", "measure_id": "201900011", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City impose a 1.5% business tax on shared rides and a 3.25% business tax on private rides for fares charged by commercial ride-share and driverless-vehicle companies until November 5, 2045, raising an estimated $30\u201335 million annually, to fund improvements in Muni service and bicycle and pedestrian safety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 135721, "no_votes": 64896, "total_votes": 200617, "percent_yes": 67.6517942148472, "percent_no": 32.3482057851528, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a 1", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a 1.5% business tax on shared rides and a 3.25% business tax on private rides provided by ride-share and driverless-vehicle companies through November 2045. The tax is estimated to raise $30-35 million annually to fund public transit improvements and bicycle and pedestrian safety projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.988322", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.481552", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City impose a 1.5% business tax on shared rides and a 3.25% business tax on private rides for fares charged by commercial ride-share and driverless-vehicle companies until November 5, 2045, raising an estimated $30\u201335 million annually, to fund improvements in Muni service and bicycle and pedestrian safety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3462, "fingerprint": "2019|201900012|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900012|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1ae95ca276647d7a", "measure_id": "201900012", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Planning Code to allow 100% Affordable Housing Projects and Educator Housing Projects in public zoning districts and to expedite approval of these projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 151865, "no_votes": 47175, "total_votes": 199040, "percent_yes": 76.29873392282958, "percent_no": 23.701266077170416, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended San Francisco's Planning Code to allow 100% affordable h...", "summary_text": "This measure amended San Francisco's Planning Code to allow 100% affordable housing projects and educator housing projects to be built in public zoning districts and created an expedited approval process for these projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.988590", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.481750", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Planning Code to allow 100% Affordable Housing Projects and Educator Housing Projects in public zoning districts and to expedite approval of these projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3463, "fingerprint": "2019|201900013|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900013|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "c39c58d2c8333e4c", "measure_id": "201900013", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City establish new restrictions on campaign contributions to local elected officials and candidates, and apply new disclaimer requirements to campaign advertisements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 151023, "no_votes": 45384, "total_votes": 196407, "percent_yes": 76.89288059997862, "percent_no": 23.107119400021375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established new restrictions on campaign contributions to San Fr...", "summary_text": "This measure established new restrictions on campaign contributions to San Francisco elected officials and candidates, and implemented new disclaimer requirements for campaign advertisements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.988850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.481944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City establish new restrictions on campaign contributions to local elected officials and candidates, and apply new disclaimer requirements to campaign advertisements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3464, "fingerprint": "2019|201900014|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900014|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "13a89c4f603bb5cc", "measure_id": "201900014", "measure_letter": "A-19", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain fire protection, improve 911 emergency response times, provide 24 hours per day, seven days a week staffed fire/emergency response services instead of the current 9 hours per day, shall Templeton Community Services District Ordinance No. 2019-1 levying an annual special tax of $180 per parcel, providing $486,000 a year until ended by voters, subject to annual CPI adjustment capped at 2% with citizens\u2019 oversight, and annual reports be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1766, "no_votes": 513, "total_votes": 2279, "percent_yes": 77.49012724879333, "percent_no": 22.50987275120667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Templeton Community Services District to levy an ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Templeton Community Services District to levy an annual special tax of $180 per parcel to fund expanded fire protection and emergency response services, increasing staffing from 9 hours per day to 24/7 coverage. The tax generates approximately $486,000 annually and includes annual cost-of-living adjustments capped at 2%, with citizen oversight and reporting requirements.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-08-27", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.989261", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.482136", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain fire protection, improve 911 emergency response times, provide 24 hours per day, seven days a week staffed fire/emergency response services instead of the current 9 hours per day, shall Templeton Community Services District Ordinance No. 2019-1 levying an annual special tax of $180 per parcel, providing $486,000 a year until ended by voters, subject to annual CPI adjustment capped at 2% with citizens\u2019 oversight, and annual reports be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3465, "fingerprint": "2019|201900015|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900015|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "164a5635bbb0c228", "measure_id": "201900015", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the La Honda Road territory consisting of ten houses and 23 undeveloped parcels of the La Honda Vista Subdivision in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County be transferred from the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District to the Portola Valley School District and Sequoia Union High School District, such that by operation of the law, persons residing in that territory would become residents of the Portola Valley School District and Sequoia Union High School District, and be subject to those districts' parcel taxes, effective July 1, 2020?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 16, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure transferred the La Honda Road territory, consisting of ten house...", "summary_text": "This measure transferred the La Honda Road territory, consisting of ten houses and 23 undeveloped parcels, from the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District to the Portola Valley School District and Sequoia Union High School District. Residents in this territory became subject to the parcel taxes of their new school districts, effective July 1, 2020.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.989558", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.482342", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the La Honda Road territory consisting of ten houses and 23 undeveloped parcels of the La Honda Vista Subdivision in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County be transferred from the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District to the Portola Valley School District and Sequoia Union High School District, such that by operation of the law, persons residing in that territory would become residents of the Portola Valley School District and Sequoia Union High School District, and be subject to those districts' parcel taxes, effective July 1, 2020?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3466, "fingerprint": "2019|201900051|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900051|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "74376c8da1c1595c", "measure_id": "201900051", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City increase the uniform transient occupancy tax, payable by transients for the privilege of occupying a hotel room, to fourteen percent (14%) of the rent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 723, "no_votes": 300, "total_votes": 1023, "percent_yes": 70.67448680351906, "percent_no": 29.32551319648094, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased San Mateo's transient occupancy tax on hotel room occup...", "summary_text": "The measure increased San Mateo's transient occupancy tax on hotel room occupancy from its previous rate to 14% of the rent. The tax revenue would be used for general municipal expenses.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.989821", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.482534", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City increase the uniform transient occupancy tax, payable by transients for the privilege of occupying a hotel room, to fourteen percent (14%) of the rent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3467, "fingerprint": "2019|201900052|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900052|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b734cc4bffe7730a", "measure_id": "201900052", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City revise/increase the annual usiness license tax on a liquid storage facility of up to six cents per barrel delivered over the rack to such facility in the preceding calendar year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 863, "no_votes": 164, "total_votes": 1027, "percent_yes": 84.03115871470301, "percent_no": 15.968841285296989, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of San Mateo to revise and increase the annu...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of San Mateo to revise and increase the annual business license tax on liquid storage facilities to up to six cents per barrel of liquid delivered to the facility in the previous calendar year. The revenue would fund general municipal expenses.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.990085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.482726", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City revise/increase the annual usiness license tax on a liquid storage facility of up to six cents per barrel delivered over the rack to such facility in the preceding calendar year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3468, "fingerprint": "2019|201900053|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900053|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "af1fc53945d377df", "measure_id": "201900053", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City establish a business license tax on cannabis businesses in the City in the amount of up to six percent (6%) of the gross receipts of such businesses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 832, "no_votes": 188, "total_votes": 1020, "percent_yes": 81.56862745098039, "percent_no": 18.431372549019613, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established a business license tax of up to 6% of gross receipts ...", "summary_text": "The measure established a business license tax of up to 6% of gross receipts on cannabis businesses operating in San Mateo to fund general municipal expenses.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.990346", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.482917", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City establish a business license tax on cannabis businesses in the City in the amount of up to six percent (6%) of the gross receipts of such businesses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3469, "fingerprint": "2019|201900054|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900054|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8746fc3e31300bbf", "measure_id": "201900054", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Bruno's measure to fund city services/facilities such as neighborhood police patrols; fire prevention services;' urban wildfire protection; crime suppression/investigation; pothole/street repair; increasing parking supply; upgrading parks/other city services/facilities; expanding services supporting local businesses; by levying a 1/2\u00a2 sales tax, providing approximately $4,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for Sacramento, all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4677, "no_votes": 2914, "total_votes": 7591, "percent_yes": 61.61243577921223, "percent_no": 38.38756422078777, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of San Bruno to levy a 0", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of San Bruno to levy a 0.5% sales tax to fund various city services and facilities including police patrols, fire prevention, street repairs, parks, and business support services. The tax generates approximately $4 million annually and continues until voters decide to end it, with independent oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.990616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.483108", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Bruno's measure to fund city services/facilities such as neighborhood police patrols; fire prevention services;' urban wildfire protection; crime suppression/investigation; pothole/street repair; increasing parking supply; upgrading parks/other city services/facilities; expanding services supporting local businesses; by levying a 1/2\u00a2 sales tax, providing approximately $4,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for Sacramento, all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3471, "fingerprint": "2019|201900066|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900066|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5c4e000a227a057f", "measure_id": "201900066", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education in Redwood City with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, to attract and retain highly qualified teachers; support quality reading and writing programs; maintain science, technology, engineering and math instruction; and reduce class sizes in kindergarten and first grade, shall a Redwood City School District parcel tax measure of $149 per parcel for 12 years be adopted, raising $3,450,000 annually with citizen oversight, exemption for seniors, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10886, "no_votes": 5552, "total_votes": 16438, "percent_yes": 66.22460153303321, "percent_no": 33.77539846696679, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a $149 annual parcel tax for 12 years on prop...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a $149 annual parcel tax for 12 years on properties within the Redwood City School District to raise approximately $3,450,000 annually for educational programs and services. The measure included exemptions for senior citizens and required citizen oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.991204", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.483600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education in Redwood City with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, to attract and retain highly qualified teachers; support quality reading and writing programs; maintain science, technology, engineering and math instruction; and reduce class sizes in kindergarten and first grade, shall a Redwood City School District parcel tax measure of $149 per parcel for 12 years be adopted, raising $3,450,000 annually with citizen oversight, exemption for seniors, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3470, "fingerprint": "2019|201900065|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900065|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4fdc6826352bbc74", "measure_id": "201900065", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education in Coastside schools without increasing taxes; preserve strong academic programs in reading, writing, science, technology, engineering, arts, math; retain qualified teachers/staff; prepare students for college and careers; and maintain school safety and security; shall a measure to renew its expiring $150 education parcel tax for eight years be adopted, raising approximately $1,600,000 annually with independent citizen oversight, exemptions for seniors and others, and all funds staying in Coastside schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5356, "no_votes": 1783, "total_votes": 7139, "percent_yes": 75.02451323714806, "percent_no": 24.975486762851943, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an expiring $150 annual parcel tax for eight years to fu...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an expiring $150 annual parcel tax for eight years to fund education programs, teacher retention, and school safety in Coastside schools, generating approximately $1.6 million annually. The measure included exemptions for seniors and other qualifying residents and required independent citizen oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.990914", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.483306", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education in Coastside schools without increasing taxes; preserve strong academic programs in reading, writing, science, technology, engineering, arts, math; retain qualified teachers/staff; prepare students for college and careers; and maintain school safety and security; shall a measure to renew its expiring $150 education parcel tax for eight years be adopted, raising approximately $1,600,000 annually with independent citizen oversight, exemptions for seniors and others, and all funds staying in Coastside schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3472, "fingerprint": "2019|201900067|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900067|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "71b6ad4db96b2bbe", "measure_id": "201900067", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain strong core academic programs, including math and science, attract/retain qualified teachers, limit class sizes, provide up-to-date instructional materials, protect art, music, reading/writing programs, keep libraries open, shall Saratoga Union School District\u2019s measure renewing without increasing its expiring $68 annual parcel tax for eight years, be approved, raising $475,000 annually which cannot be taken by the State, with exemptions for seniors, audits, independent oversight, no funds for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3504, "no_votes": 1345, "total_votes": 4849, "percent_yes": 72.26232212827387, "percent_no": 27.737677871726135, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing $68 annual parcel tax in the Saratoga Union ...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing $68 annual parcel tax in the Saratoga Union School District for eight years without increasing the rate, generating approximately $475,000 annually for educational programs and services. The measure included exemptions for seniors and provisions for audits and independent oversight.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.991497", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.483865", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain strong core academic programs, including math and science, attract/retain qualified teachers, limit class sizes, provide up-to-date instructional materials, protect art, music, reading/writing programs, keep libraries open, shall Saratoga Union School District\u2019s measure renewing without increasing its expiring $68 annual parcel tax for eight years, be approved, raising $475,000 annually which cannot be taken by the State, with exemptions for seniors, audits, independent oversight, no funds for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3474, "fingerprint": "2019|201900055|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900055|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0ac3ea2b60aaddbd", "measure_id": "201900055", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue the existing protections provided by the current Urban Growth Boundary (\"UGB\"), such as preventing urban sprawl, protecting community separators, and preserving agricultural land and open space, shall the City of Rohnert Park extend its UGB until December 31, 2040, exclude approximately 80 acres located in the County and south of Valley House Drive and west of Petaluma Hill Road, and require that future changes to the UGB be approved by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5733, "no_votes": 595, "total_votes": 6328, "percent_yes": 90.59734513274336, "percent_no": 9.402654867256643, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended Rohnert Park's Urban Growth Boundary until December 31,...", "summary_text": "This measure extended Rohnert Park's Urban Growth Boundary until December 31, 2040, excluded approximately 80 acres located south of Valley House Drive and west of Petaluma Hill Road from the boundary, and required voter approval for future changes to the boundary.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.992023", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.484333", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue the existing protections provided by the current Urban Growth Boundary (\"UGB\"), such as preventing urban sprawl, protecting community separators, and preserving agricultural land and open space, shall the City of Rohnert Park extend its UGB until December 31, 2040, exclude approximately 80 acres located in the County and south of Valley House Drive and west of Petaluma Hill Road, and require that future changes to the UGB be approved by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3473, "fingerprint": "2019|201900016|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900016|SONOMA", "content_hash": "56d633ba9715f7a2", "measure_id": "201900016", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to continue to provide fire and emergency services, shall Occidental Community Services \r\nDistrict Ordinance No. 2019-02, authorizing the District to impose and levy a special tax based on use codes shown on Attachment \"A\" of the Ordinance of $200.00 for residential properties; $100 for agricultural land; and $300.00 per assessor's parcel plus $0.14 per square foot for commercial properties; raising approximately $250,000.00 annually until repealed; and increasing the District's appropriations, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 745, "no_votes": 149, "total_votes": 894, "percent_yes": 83.33333333333334, "percent_no": 16.666666666666657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes Occidental Community Services District to impose a spe...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes Occidental Community Services District to impose a special tax of $200 for residential properties, $100 for agricultural land, and $300 plus $0.14 per square foot for commercial properties to fund fire and emergency services. The tax would raise approximately $250,000 annually until repealed.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.991763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.484114", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to continue to provide fire and emergency services, shall Occidental Community Services \r\nDistrict Ordinance No. 2019-02, authorizing the District to impose and levy a special tax based on use codes shown on Attachment \"A\" of the Ordinance of $200.00 for residential properties; $100 for agricultural land; and $300.00 per assessor's parcel plus $0.14 per square foot for commercial properties; raising approximately $250,000.00 annually until repealed; and increasing the District's appropriations, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3475, "fingerprint": "2019|201900056|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900056|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "bc01dd1cb1a2c24c", "measure_id": "201900056", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help prevent additional budget cuts and maintain City services, including police and fire protection, senior programs, and other general services, shall the City of Oakdale extend the existing \u00bd cent sales tax set to expire April 2020, for an additional eleven (11) years, with resident oversight and annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2020, "no_votes": 729, "total_votes": 2749, "percent_yes": 73.48126591487814, "percent_no": 26.518734085121864, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure extends Oakdale's existing half-cent sales tax for an additional ...", "summary_text": "The measure extends Oakdale's existing half-cent sales tax for an additional eleven years beyond its April 2020 expiration date. The revenue would fund general city services including police, fire protection, senior programs, and other municipal services, with resident oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.992407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.484554", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help prevent additional budget cuts and maintain City services, including police and fire protection, senior programs, and other general services, shall the City of Oakdale extend the existing \u00bd cent sales tax set to expire April 2020, for an additional eleven (11) years, with resident oversight and annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3476, "fingerprint": "2019|201900057|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2019|201900057|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "ae89713d65f1f200", "measure_id": "201900057", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2019, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be an appointed position?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1143, "no_votes": 1554, "total_votes": 2697, "percent_yes": 42.38042269187986, "percent_no": 57.61957730812014, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the City Clerk position in Stanislaus, Califo...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the City Clerk position in Stanislaus, California from an elected office to one appointed by the city government. The measure failed with 42.4% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2019-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.992703", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.484810", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be an appointed position?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3477, "fingerprint": "2018|201800001|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800001|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "755a034e9796238d", "measure_id": "201800001", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To expand access to childcare and preschool for low- and middle-income families; help homeless and at-risk children, including help preventing child abuse and neglect; attract and retain quality childcare workers; and add spaces for childcare at locations throughout the county, shall the County of Alameda enact a 30-year \u00bd% sales tax providing approximately 140 million dollars annually with citizens\u2019 oversight, public disclosure of spending, and mandatory annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 214955, "no_votes": 109726, "total_votes": 324681, "percent_yes": 66.20498273690177, "percent_no": 33.79501726309823, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted a 30-year, 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted a 30-year, 0.5% sales tax in Alameda County to fund childcare and preschool programs for low- and middle-income families, services for homeless and at-risk children, childcare worker retention, and additional childcare facilities. The tax was expected to generate approximately $140 million annually with oversight provisions including citizen oversight, public spending disclosure, and mandatory annual audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.993033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.485045", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand access to childcare and preschool for low- and middle-income families; help homeless and at-risk children, including help preventing child abuse and neglect; attract and retain quality childcare workers; and add spaces for childcare at locations throughout the county, shall the County of Alameda enact a 30-year \u00bd% sales tax providing approximately 140 million dollars annually with citizens\u2019 oversight, public disclosure of spending, and mandatory annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3493, "fingerprint": "2018|201800117|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800117|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9400ceca3c35d92f", "measure_id": "201800117", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending Oakland\u2019s Charter for the purposes of funding services to: expand access to early childhood and preschool education; improve high school and college graduation and career readiness; provide mentoring and college financial assistance; by establishing a $198, 30-year parcel tax for single family parcels and specified rates for other parcel types, raising approximately $25,000,000 \u2013 30,000,000 annually, with citizen\u2019s oversight, and exemptions for low-income households and others, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 96452, "no_votes": 57946, "total_votes": 154398, "percent_yes": 62.46972111037707, "percent_no": 37.53027888962293, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 30-year parcel tax of $198 for single-f...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 30-year parcel tax of $198 for single-family homes (with specified rates for other property types) to fund early childhood education, preschool, high school and college readiness programs, mentoring, and college financial assistance in Oakland. The tax was projected to raise $25-30 million annually and included exemptions for low-income households and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.997863", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.488861", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending Oakland\u2019s Charter for the purposes of funding services to: expand access to early childhood and preschool education; improve high school and college graduation and career readiness; provide mentoring and college financial assistance; by establishing a $198, 30-year parcel tax for single family parcels and specified rates for other parcel types, raising approximately $25,000,000 \u2013 30,000,000 annually, with citizen\u2019s oversight, and exemptions for low-income households and others, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3503, "fingerprint": "2018|201800495|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800495|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3c6ffee962655d6b", "measure_id": "201800495", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms and educational buildings at local schools; make health, safety and security improvements; improve student access to technology; replace and upgrade outdated heating, ventilation, and electrical systems; shall San Lorenzo Unified School District issue $130,000,000 of bonds at legal rates with citizen oversights and audits, raising an average of $8,000,000 annually for bonds while bonds remain outstanding from rates estimated at $0.06 per $100 assessed valuation, with no money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7550, "no_votes": 3582, "total_votes": 11132, "percent_yes": 67.82249371182178, "percent_no": 32.17750628817822, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the San Lorenzo Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the San Lorenzo Unified School District to issue $130 million in bonds to fund facility upgrades including classrooms, restrooms, HVAC and electrical systems, technology access, and health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $0.06 per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.000666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.490832", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms and educational buildings at local schools; make health, safety and security improvements; improve student access to technology; replace and upgrade outdated heating, ventilation, and electrical systems; shall San Lorenzo Unified School District issue $130,000,000 of bonds at legal rates with citizen oversights and audits, raising an average of $8,000,000 annually for bonds while bonds remain outstanding from rates estimated at $0.06 per $100 assessed valuation, with no money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3499, "fingerprint": "2018|201800123|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800123|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "42bd2bcf7f11011b", "measure_id": "201800123", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the Charter of the City of Piedmont to modify procedures for filling of vacancies in elected offices for City Council and Board of Education for the Piedmont Unified School District, modify term limits for the City Council, and making other clarifying amendments regarding City recordkeeping, format of City ordinances, public posting, City contract approval, operation of City Council meetings, and other minor technical amendments, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3927, "no_votes": 2106, "total_votes": 6033, "percent_yes": 65.09199403281949, "percent_no": 34.908005967180515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Piedmont's city charter to change procedures for filling...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Piedmont's city charter to change procedures for filling vacancies on the City Council and school board, modify City Council term limits, and make various technical updates to city operations including recordkeeping, ordinance formatting, public posting requirements, contract approval processes, and council meeting procedures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.999524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.490053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the Charter of the City of Piedmont to modify procedures for filling of vacancies in elected offices for City Council and Board of Education for the Piedmont Unified School District, modify term limits for the City Council, and making other clarifying amendments regarding City recordkeeping, format of City ordinances, public posting, City contract approval, operation of City Council meetings, and other minor technical amendments, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3479, "fingerprint": "2018|201800103|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800103|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "91168d36b7986c15", "measure_id": "201800103", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide affordable housing and prevent displacement of vulnerable populations, including low and middle-income households, veterans, local artists, seniors, and the disabled; provide supportive housing for people experiencing homelessness; and help low-and middle-income households purchase homes; shall the City of Emeryville issue $50,000,000 in bonds with an estimated average levy of 4.912 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $3,422,000 annually to pay bonds over 27 years, requiring independent oversight, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1865, "no_votes": 721, "total_votes": 2586, "percent_yes": 72.11910286156225, "percent_no": 27.880897138437746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the City of Emeryville to issue $50 million in bonds t...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the City of Emeryville to issue $50 million in bonds to fund affordable housing programs, supportive housing for homeless individuals, and homebuyer assistance for low and middle-income residents. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 4.912 cents per $100 of assessed value over 27 years.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.993750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.485543", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide affordable housing and prevent displacement of vulnerable populations, including low and middle-income households, veterans, local artists, seniors, and the disabled; provide supportive housing for people experiencing homelessness; and help low-and middle-income households purchase homes; shall the City of Emeryville issue $50,000,000 in bonds with an estimated average levy of 4.912 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $3,422,000 annually to pay bonds over 27 years, requiring independent oversight, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3500, "fingerprint": "2018|201800124|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800124|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ec1b33ae2472260b", "measure_id": "201800124", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the Charter of the City of Piedmont to clarify the duties and reporting structure for officers and employees of the City be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3889, "no_votes": 1956, "total_votes": 5845, "percent_yes": 66.535500427716, "percent_no": 33.464499572284, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Piedmont's city charter to clarify the duties and report...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Piedmont's city charter to clarify the duties and reporting structure for city officers and employees. The amendment passed with 66.5% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.999785", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.490248", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the Charter of the City of Piedmont to clarify the duties and reporting structure for officers and employees of the City be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3480, "fingerprint": "2018|201800104|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800104|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "04b6749e47728ac8", "measure_id": "201800104", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, to protect and improve library services throughout Oakland, including: providing safe places for youth after school; preventing library closures; providing youth reading and senior programs, evening/weekend hours for students/families and adult literacy services; establishing a 20 year annual parcel tax, $75 for single family parcels, other parcel type at specified rates; and providing about $10,000,000 annually, with audits, citizens' oversight and exemptions for low income seniors and residents, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73716, "no_votes": 22161, "total_votes": 95877, "percent_yes": 76.88601020056947, "percent_no": 23.113989799430527, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a 20-year annual parcel tax of $75 for single-family...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a 20-year annual parcel tax of $75 for single-family parcels (with specified rates for other parcel types) to fund Oakland library services including youth programs, extended hours, and adult literacy services. The tax generates approximately $10 million annually and includes provisions for audits, citizen oversight, and exemptions for low-income seniors and residents.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.994083", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.485792", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, to protect and improve library services throughout Oakland, including: providing safe places for youth after school; preventing library closures; providing youth reading and senior programs, evening/weekend hours for students/families and adult literacy services; establishing a 20 year annual parcel tax, $75 for single family parcels, other parcel type at specified rates; and providing about $10,000,000 annually, with audits, citizens' oversight and exemptions for low income seniors and residents, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3501, "fingerprint": "2018|201800125|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800125|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c479c1c407f2aa18", "measure_id": "201800125", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain/enhance essential city services including 911 dispatch/neighborhood police patrols/emergency response times; after-school programs for children/teens; keeping fire stations open full time; and other essential services shall a measure be adopted establishing a Union City cannabis business tax at a maximum rate of $12.00 per square foot for cultivation and 6% of gross receipts for others, until ended by voters, providing $1,400,000 annually, requiring oversight and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15125, "no_votes": 5116, "total_votes": 20241, "percent_yes": 74.72456894422213, "percent_no": 25.275431055777872, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a cannabis business tax in Union City at a maximum r...", "summary_text": "This measure established a cannabis business tax in Union City at a maximum rate of $12 per square foot for cultivation operations and 6% of gross receipts for other cannabis businesses. The tax was projected to generate approximately $1.4 million annually for city services until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.000050", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.490443", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/enhance essential city services including 911 dispatch/neighborhood police patrols/emergency response times; after-school programs for children/teens; keeping fire stations open full time; and other essential services shall a measure be adopted establishing a Union City cannabis business tax at a maximum rate of $12.00 per square foot for cultivation and 6% of gross receipts for others, until ended by voters, providing $1,400,000 annually, requiring oversight and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3505, "fingerprint": "2018|201800497|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800497|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3e3190a8d8085283", "measure_id": "201800497", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue providing the colleges of Alameda, Berkeley, Laney, and Merritt, funds that cannot be taken by the state to support affordable college education, including core academic programs to prepare students for university transfer and successful careers, by providing tutoring and teacher support; shall Peralta Community College District continue to levy $48 per parcel annually for eight years, providing $8,000,000 annually, with internal and citizens\u2019 oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds benefitting local colleges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 215323, "no_votes": 45796, "total_votes": 261119, "percent_yes": 82.46163626545751, "percent_no": 17.538363734542486, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Peralta Community College District to continue le...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Peralta Community College District to continue levying a $48 annual parcel tax for eight years to generate $8 million annually for the four colleges in the district. The funds were designated for core academic programs, tutoring, teacher support, and other educational services, with restrictions prohibiting use for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.001360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.491216", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue providing the colleges of Alameda, Berkeley, Laney, and Merritt, funds that cannot be taken by the state to support affordable college education, including core academic programs to prepare students for university transfer and successful careers, by providing tutoring and teacher support; shall Peralta Community College District continue to levy $48 per parcel annually for eight years, providing $8,000,000 annually, with internal and citizens\u2019 oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds benefitting local colleges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3502, "fingerprint": "2018|201800126|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800126|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9180819b67ebe437", "measure_id": "201800126", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To enhance local control with funding that cannot be taken by the State for essential services including fire/police protection; youth violence/gang prevention programs; maintaining city parks/senior services; and other essential services; shall a measure be adopted establishing Union City as a Charter City and a real property transfer tax of $10 per $1,000, until ended by voters, paid only by property buyers/sellers, providing $5,000,000 dollars annually, with funds benefiting Union City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9260, "no_votes": 10785, "total_votes": 20045, "percent_yes": 46.19605886754802, "percent_no": 53.80394113245198, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have established Union City as a charter city and imposed a...", "summary_text": "The measure would have established Union City as a charter city and imposed a real property transfer tax of $10 per $1,000 of property value, paid by buyers and sellers during property transactions. The tax was expected to generate approximately $5 million annually to fund local services including fire and police protection, youth programs, parks, and senior services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.000369", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.490640", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance local control with funding that cannot be taken by the State for essential services including fire/police protection; youth violence/gang prevention programs; maintaining city parks/senior services; and other essential services; shall a measure be adopted establishing Union City as a Charter City and a real property transfer tax of $10 per $1,000, until ended by voters, paid only by property buyers/sellers, providing $5,000,000 dollars annually, with funds benefiting Union City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3482, "fingerprint": "2018|201800106|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800106|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d1c9fd5e73596e7e", "measure_id": "201800106", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure maintaining the City of Alameda\u2019s financial stability and protecting services and infrastructure such as police response to violent crimes and burglaries; 9-1-1 emergency medical and fire response; maintaining neighborhood parks; repairing potholes, maintaining streets and protecting the Bay from pollution by enacting a 0.5% sales tax until repealed by voters, providing approximately $5,000,000 annually in locally controlled revenues, requiring independent audits and public spending review, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20334, "no_votes": 12729, "total_votes": 33063, "percent_yes": 61.50077125487705, "percent_no": 38.49922874512295, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.5% sales tax in Alameda to generate approximately $5 million annually for city services including police, fire, emergency medical response, parks maintenance, street repairs, and environmental protection. The tax remains in effect until repealed by voters and includes requirements for independent audits and public spending oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.994685", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.486334", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure maintaining the City of Alameda\u2019s financial stability and protecting services and infrastructure such as police response to violent crimes and burglaries; 9-1-1 emergency medical and fire response; maintaining neighborhood parks; repairing potholes, maintaining streets and protecting the Bay from pollution by enacting a 0.5% sales tax until repealed by voters, providing approximately $5,000,000 annually in locally controlled revenues, requiring independent audits and public spending review, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3506, "fingerprint": "2018|201800498|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800498|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a02f37aa6ee87434", "measure_id": "201800498", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade aging classrooms, technology, science labs; expand job training classrooms; and acquire, construct, repair sites/facilities/equipment, shall the Peralta Community College District issue $800 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with approximately $44.2 million in taxes raised annually for 40 years at projected tax rates of $24.50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, with no funds for administrator salaries, audits and citizen oversight, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 193341, "no_votes": 61797, "total_votes": 255138, "percent_yes": 75.77899019354231, "percent_no": 24.221009806457687, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Peralta Community College District to issue $800 m...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Peralta Community College District to issue $800 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, technology, and science labs, expand job training facilities, and acquire or construct educational sites and equipment. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $24.50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation annually for 40 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.001694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.491425", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade aging classrooms, technology, science labs; expand job training classrooms; and acquire, construct, repair sites/facilities/equipment, shall the Peralta Community College District issue $800 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with approximately $44.2 million in taxes raised annually for 40 years at projected tax rates of $24.50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, with no funds for administrator salaries, audits and citizen oversight, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3504, "fingerprint": "2018|201800496|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800496|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c44d6f1710365f1e", "measure_id": "201800496", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe/modern schools; upgrade aging classrooms/school facilities; update classroom technology; provide art/music classrooms; improve accessibility for students with disabilities; upgrade fire safety/emergency communications/school security systems; install solar panels; repair leaky roofs; update plumbing/heating/ventilation systems, shall Hayward Unified School District issue $381,700,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value annually (generating approximately $24,502,000), anticipated through 2049-50, with independent oversight and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32498, "no_votes": 12070, "total_votes": 44568, "percent_yes": 72.91778854783702, "percent_no": 27.08221145216298, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Hayward Unified School District to issue $381", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Hayward Unified School District to issue $381.7 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including classroom upgrades, technology updates, accessibility improvements, safety systems, solar panels, and infrastructure repairs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes of approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value annually through 2049-50.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.001051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.491023", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe/modern schools; upgrade aging classrooms/school facilities; update classroom technology; provide art/music classrooms; improve accessibility for students with disabilities; upgrade fire safety/emergency communications/school security systems; install solar panels; repair leaky roofs; update plumbing/heating/ventilation systems, shall Hayward Unified School District issue $381,700,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy approximately $60 per $100,000 of assessed value annually (generating approximately $24,502,000), anticipated through 2049-50, with independent oversight and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3507, "fingerprint": "2018|201800499|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800499|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "07dd7890ce4b9f10", "measure_id": "201800499", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To restore funding previously approved by voters to protect the quality of education in local schools, provide high quality programs in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades that prepare students for success in college/careers, and attract/retain highly qualified teachers, on an ongoing basis shall the San Leandro Unified School District levy $39 per parcel, raising $745,000 annually, with annual cost of living adjustments, an exemption for seniors, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16716, "no_votes": 5542, "total_votes": 22258, "percent_yes": 75.10108724952826, "percent_no": 24.898912750471737, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Leandro Unified School District to levy an an...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Leandro Unified School District to levy an annual $39 per parcel tax with cost of living adjustments to fund educational programs in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades, and to attract and retain teachers. The measure includes a senior exemption, citizen oversight, and prohibits using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.001958", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.491619", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore funding previously approved by voters to protect the quality of education in local schools, provide high quality programs in math, science, technology, arts, and skilled trades that prepare students for success in college/careers, and attract/retain highly qualified teachers, on an ongoing basis shall the San Leandro Unified School District levy $39 per parcel, raising $745,000 annually, with annual cost of living adjustments, an exemption for seniors, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3508, "fingerprint": "2018|201800500|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800500|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6d434bbab5d690d4", "measure_id": "201800500", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support academic excellence, provide stable, local funding the State cannot take away, to improve classroom technology, maintain after school programs and provide competitive salaries to help attract and retain highly qualified teachers and staff, shall the San Lorenzo Unified School District be authorized to levy a $99 per parcel tax providing $2 million annually for eight years beginning July 1, 2019, with exemptions for senior citizens and no funds spent on administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14210, "no_votes": 6377, "total_votes": 20587, "percent_yes": 69.02414144848692, "percent_no": 30.975858551513085, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the San Lorenzo Unified School District to levy a $99 ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the San Lorenzo Unified School District to levy a $99 annual parcel tax for eight years starting July 1, 2019, generating $2 million annually to fund classroom technology, after-school programs, and teacher salaries, with exemptions for senior citizens. The measure passed with 69% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.002222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.491813", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support academic excellence, provide stable, local funding the State cannot take away, to improve classroom technology, maintain after school programs and provide competitive salaries to help attract and retain highly qualified teachers and staff, shall the San Lorenzo Unified School District be authorized to levy a $99 per parcel tax providing $2 million annually for eight years beginning July 1, 2019, with exemptions for senior citizens and no funds spent on administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3481, "fingerprint": "2018|201800105|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800105|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "76abad48a6c5f783", "measure_id": "201800105", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Charter be amended by incorporating Ordinance 3148, the City\u2019s Rent Review, Rent Stabilization and Limitations on Evictions law, with the following modifications: (a) preclude City Council from amending the law in response to changing conditions and concerns, and require voter approval instead, and (b) eliminate the December 31, 2019 sunset clause?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12993, "no_votes": 19743, "total_votes": 32736, "percent_yes": 39.69024926686217, "percent_no": 60.30975073313783, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have incorporated Alameda's existing rent control and evic...", "summary_text": "This measure would have incorporated Alameda's existing rent control and eviction limitation ordinance into the city charter, removing the City Council's ability to amend it without voter approval and eliminating the law's 2019 expiration date.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.994382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.486054", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Charter be amended by incorporating Ordinance 3148, the City\u2019s Rent Review, Rent Stabilization and Limitations on Evictions law, with the following modifications: (a) preclude City Council from amending the law in response to changing conditions and concerns, and require voter approval instead, and (b) eliminate the December 31, 2019 sunset clause?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3483, "fingerprint": "2018|201800107|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800107|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5cf31980177224ce", "measure_id": "201800107", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue providing and maintaining essential City services, such as: fire and police protection, public safety and emergency response, facilities maintenance, and environmental preservation, shall the City of Albany measure making its existing one-half cent transactions and use (sales) tax permanent, providing $1.4 million annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, without increasing the rate, with annual independent audits, and all funds spent only in Albany, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6819, "no_votes": 1596, "total_votes": 8415, "percent_yes": 81.03386809269162, "percent_no": 18.96613190730838, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure made Albany's existing half-cent sales tax permanent, continuing...", "summary_text": "This measure made Albany's existing half-cent sales tax permanent, continuing to generate approximately $1.4 million annually for general city services including fire, police, public safety, and facilities maintenance. The measure did not increase the tax rate but removed the expiration date from the existing tax.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.994949", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.486592", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue providing and maintaining essential City services, such as: fire and police protection, public safety and emergency response, facilities maintenance, and environmental preservation, shall the City of Albany measure making its existing one-half cent transactions and use (sales) tax permanent, providing $1.4 million annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, without increasing the rate, with annual independent audits, and all funds spent only in Albany, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3484, "fingerprint": "2018|201800108|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800108|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6c6b089ce4c441fd", "measure_id": "201800108", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve park and open space facilities, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including maintaining: City parks, ballfields, play structures, picnic areas and restrooms; vegetation management to prevent wildfires; creek habitat; and Albany Hill open space; shall the City of Albany measure levying an ongoing park and open space parcel tax with a typical rate of $69 for a single-family residence, providing $463,675 annually, exempting low-income residents, with annual independent audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6489, "no_votes": 1849, "total_votes": 8338, "percent_yes": 77.82441832573758, "percent_no": 22.175581674262418, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established an ongoing parcel tax in Albany, California to fund ...", "summary_text": "This measure established an ongoing parcel tax in Albany, California to fund maintenance and improvements of parks, open spaces, and fire prevention activities, with a typical rate of $69 for single-family residences and exemptions for low-income residents. The tax generates approximately $463,675 annually with independent audits required.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.995211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.486848", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve park and open space facilities, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including maintaining: City parks, ballfields, play structures, picnic areas and restrooms; vegetation management to prevent wildfires; creek habitat; and Albany Hill open space; shall the City of Albany measure levying an ongoing park and open space parcel tax with a typical rate of $69 for a single-family residence, providing $463,675 annually, exempting low-income residents, with annual independent audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3485, "fingerprint": "2018|201800109|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800109|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d3f44bb9292a6d47", "measure_id": "201800109", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 3.01 of the Albany City Charter be amended, as set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide that the City Treasurer shall be appointed by the City Council effective December 10, 2020, or sooner if there is a vacancy in the office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5274, "no_votes": 1972, "total_votes": 7246, "percent_yes": 72.78498481921059, "percent_no": 27.215015180789408, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Albany City Charter to change the City Treasurer pos...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Albany City Charter to change the City Treasurer position from elected to appointed by the City Council, with the change taking effect December 10, 2020, or earlier if a vacancy occurred.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.995475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.487109", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 3.01 of the Albany City Charter be amended, as set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide that the City Treasurer shall be appointed by the City Council effective December 10, 2020, or sooner if there is a vacancy in the office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3487, "fingerprint": "2018|201800111|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800111|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "40358cbc20b800ee", "measure_id": "201800111", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to issue $135 million in general obligation bonds to create and preserve affordable housing for low-income households, working families, and individuals including teachers, seniors, veterans, the homeless, and persons with disabilities; subject to citizen oversight and independent audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42384, "no_votes": 12322, "total_votes": 54706, "percent_yes": 77.47596241728513, "percent_no": 22.524037582714868, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Alameda to issue $135 million in general obligation b...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Alameda to issue $135 million in general obligation bonds to create and preserve affordable housing for low-income households, working families, and individuals including teachers, seniors, veterans, the homeless, and persons with disabilities. The bonds would be subject to citizen oversight and independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.996052", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.487624", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to issue $135 million in general obligation bonds to create and preserve affordable housing for low-income households, working families, and individuals including teachers, seniors, veterans, the homeless, and persons with disabilities; subject to citizen oversight and independent audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3488, "fingerprint": "2018|201800112|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800112|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ef1c480f07e356ab", "measure_id": "201800112", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance raising funds for general municipal purposes such as navigation centers, mental health support, rehousing and other services for the homeless, including homeless seniors and youth; increasing the real property transfer tax for ten years from 1.5% to 2.5% for property sales and transfers over $1,500,000, adjusted annually to capture the top approximately 33% of transfers; generating an estimated $6,000,000 - $8,000,000 annually; and establishing the Homeless Services Panel of Experts to recommend homeless services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39337, "no_votes": 15015, "total_votes": 54352, "percent_yes": 72.3745216367383, "percent_no": 27.625478363261706, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Alameda's real property transfer tax from 1", "summary_text": "This measure increased Alameda's real property transfer tax from 1.5% to 2.5% for ten years on property sales over $1,500,000 (adjusted annually to capture approximately the top third of transfers) to fund homeless services including navigation centers, mental health support, and rehousing programs. The measure also established a Homeless Services Panel of Experts to recommend how the estimated $6-8 million in annual revenue should be used for homeless services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.996341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.487866", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance raising funds for general municipal purposes such as navigation centers, mental health support, rehousing and other services for the homeless, including homeless seniors and youth; increasing the real property transfer tax for ten years from 1.5% to 2.5% for property sales and transfers over $1,500,000, adjusted annually to capture the top approximately 33% of transfers; generating an estimated $6,000,000 - $8,000,000 annually; and establishing the Homeless Services Panel of Experts to recommend homeless services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3489, "fingerprint": "2018|201800113|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800113|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8f753291fd356363", "measure_id": "201800113", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the Rent Stabilization Ordinance to: account for potential repeal of the Costa Hawkins Rental Housing Act by preserving existing vacancy rent adjustments; update the new construction exemption from rent stabilization to a 20-year rolling period; and exempt all lawfully permitted Accessory Dwelling Units from rent stabilization and eviction for good cause protections, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35473, "no_votes": 14210, "total_votes": 49683, "percent_yes": 71.39866755228147, "percent_no": 28.601332447718534, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Alameda's rent stabilization ordinance to preserve exist...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Alameda's rent stabilization ordinance to preserve existing vacancy rent adjustments in case of Costa Hawkins repeal, change the new construction exemption to a rolling 20-year period, and exempt all permitted accessory dwelling units from rent control and eviction protections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.996605", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.488067", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the Rent Stabilization Ordinance to: account for potential repeal of the Costa Hawkins Rental Housing Act by preserving existing vacancy rent adjustments; update the new construction exemption from rent stabilization to a 20-year rolling period; and exempt all lawfully permitted Accessory Dwelling Units from rent stabilization and eviction for good cause protections, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3486, "fingerprint": "2018|201800110|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800110|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a65f4ddc70b6b3f6", "measure_id": "201800110", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the measure, advising the Mayor to engage citizens and experts in the development of Vision 2050, a 30 year plan to identify and guide implementation of climate-smart, technologically-advanced, integrated and efficient infrastructure to support a safe, vibrant and resilient future for Berkeley, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44177, "no_votes": 8014, "total_votes": 52191, "percent_yes": 84.64486214098216, "percent_no": 15.355137859017844, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure directed the Mayor of Berkeley to involve citizens and ...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure directed the Mayor of Berkeley to involve citizens and experts in creating Vision 2050, a 30-year planning initiative for climate-smart and technologically advanced infrastructure. The measure was non-binding and focused on establishing a long-term vision for the city's resilient future development.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.995735", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.487366", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the measure, advising the Mayor to engage citizens and experts in the development of Vision 2050, a 30 year plan to identify and guide implementation of climate-smart, technologically-advanced, integrated and efficient infrastructure to support a safe, vibrant and resilient future for Berkeley, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3478, "fingerprint": "2018|201800002|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800002|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f4af79b0371f2d65", "measure_id": "201800002", "measure_letter": "RM3", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 173275, "no_votes": 148245, "total_votes": 321520, "percent_yes": 53.89244837024136, "percent_no": 46.10755162975864, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized a plan to improve Bay Area transportation infrastruct...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized a plan to improve Bay Area transportation infrastructure and services through three $1 toll increases on Bay Area bridges (excluding the Golden Gate Bridge) in 2019, 2022, and 2025. The funds would be used to reduce traffic congestion and enhance public transit systems including BART, buses, ferries, and commuter rail.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.993409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.485296", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3490, "fingerprint": "2018|201800114|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800114|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d72e5f30b5b3fb27", "measure_id": "201800114", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect essential municipal services, including repairing public facilities, reducing traffic congestion, and improving pedestrian and bicycle safety; and to support regulation of the cannabis industry, and preserve the City of Emeryville\u2019s long-term financial stability, shall the ordinance to impose a business tax of up to 6% of gross receipts on all cannabis businesses within Emeryville, thereby generating an estimated $2,000,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, and which continues until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3841, "no_votes": 713, "total_votes": 4554, "percent_yes": 84.34343434343434, "percent_no": 15.656565656565661, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure imposed a business tax of up to 6% of gross receipts on cannabis ...", "summary_text": "The measure imposed a business tax of up to 6% of gross receipts on cannabis businesses operating within Emeryville, generating an estimated $2 million annually in unrestricted general revenue for the city. The tax continues indefinitely until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.996953", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.488260", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect essential municipal services, including repairing public facilities, reducing traffic congestion, and improving pedestrian and bicycle safety; and to support regulation of the cannabis industry, and preserve the City of Emeryville\u2019s long-term financial stability, shall the ordinance to impose a business tax of up to 6% of gross receipts on all cannabis businesses within Emeryville, thereby generating an estimated $2,000,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, and which continues until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3491, "fingerprint": "2018|201800115|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800115|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "498ab3809307e394", "measure_id": "201800115", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support City of Hayward services, with revenue that cannot be taken by the State, including: repairing streets and sidewalks; 911 emergency and firefighter response times; neighborhood police patrols; disaster preparedness; extended library hours and after-school programs; and unrestricted general revenue purposes; shall Hayward increase the rate of its real property transfer tax, collected once upon purchase of real estate, from $4.50 to $8.50 per $1,000, providing $13,000,000 annually, until repealed by voters, all funds benefiting Hayward?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22358, "no_votes": 15402, "total_votes": 37760, "percent_yes": 59.210805084745765, "percent_no": 40.789194915254235, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Hayward's real property transfer tax from $4", "summary_text": "This measure increased Hayward's real property transfer tax from $4.50 to $8.50 per $1,000 of property value, collected once when real estate is purchased. The tax is expected to generate $13 million annually for city services including street repairs, emergency response, police patrols, disaster preparedness, libraries, and other general municipal purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.997217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.488470", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support City of Hayward services, with revenue that cannot be taken by the State, including: repairing streets and sidewalks; 911 emergency and firefighter response times; neighborhood police patrols; disaster preparedness; extended library hours and after-school programs; and unrestricted general revenue purposes; shall Hayward increase the rate of its real property transfer tax, collected once upon purchase of real estate, from $4.50 to $8.50 per $1,000, providing $13,000,000 annually, until repealed by voters, all funds benefiting Hayward?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3492, "fingerprint": "2018|201800116|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800116|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "868a6955d9446bac", "measure_id": "201800116", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure regulating and limiting the amounts that specified hospitals, medical clinics, and other health care providers in Livermore may charge patients for health care services in Livermore be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6516, "no_votes": 28721, "total_votes": 35237, "percent_yes": 18.49192610040582, "percent_no": 81.50807389959418, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.997478", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.488666", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure regulating and limiting the amounts that specified hospitals, medical clinics, and other health care providers in Livermore may charge patients for health care services in Livermore be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3494, "fingerprint": "2018|201800118|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800118|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a5ec2ec74aa765e4", "measure_id": "201800118", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Measure: (1) allowing cannabis businesses to pay business taxes quarterly; (2) allowing cannabis manufacturing and/or cultivation businesses to deduct the value of raw materials from gross receipts in calculating business taxes in the manner applicable to manufacturing businesses; and (3) authorizing the City Council, without returning to the voters, to amend medical or non-medical cannabis businesses taxes in any manner that does not increase the tax rate, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 122628, "no_votes": 31008, "total_votes": 153636, "percent_yes": 79.81723033663985, "percent_no": 20.182769663360148, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows cannabis businesses in Alameda to pay business taxes quar...", "summary_text": "This measure allows cannabis businesses in Alameda to pay business taxes quarterly, permits cannabis manufacturers and cultivators to deduct raw material costs from gross receipts when calculating taxes, and authorizes the City Council to make amendments to cannabis business tax rates without voter approval as long as the changes do not increase rates.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.998129", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.489062", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Measure: (1) allowing cannabis businesses to pay business taxes quarterly; (2) allowing cannabis manufacturing and/or cultivation businesses to deduct the value of raw materials from gross receipts in calculating business taxes in the manner applicable to manufacturing businesses; and (3) authorizing the City Council, without returning to the voters, to amend medical or non-medical cannabis businesses taxes in any manner that does not increase the tax rate, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3495, "fingerprint": "2018|201800119|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800119|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "394f271b30f72510", "measure_id": "201800119", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Measure, to fund homeless services and resources to address illegal dumping, and discourage vacant properties, by enacting a Vacant Property Tax on parcels used less than 50 days per year, at annual rates of $6,000 per parcel, $3,000 for condominium units, and other specified rates; raising about $10,000,000 annually for 20 years; with community oversight and exemptions for very low income, low-income seniors and hardship, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 109504, "no_votes": 46849, "total_votes": 156353, "percent_yes": 70.03639201038675, "percent_no": 29.96360798961325, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacts a vacant property tax in Alameda, California, charging an...", "summary_text": "This measure enacts a vacant property tax in Alameda, California, charging annual fees of $6,000 per parcel and $3,000 per condominium unit for properties used less than 50 days per year, with exemptions for very low income households, low-income seniors, and hardship cases. The tax is expected to raise approximately $10 million annually for 20 years to fund homeless services and address illegal dumping.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.998389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.489254", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Measure, to fund homeless services and resources to address illegal dumping, and discourage vacant properties, by enacting a Vacant Property Tax on parcels used less than 50 days per year, at annual rates of $6,000 per parcel, $3,000 for condominium units, and other specified rates; raising about $10,000,000 annually for 20 years; with community oversight and exemptions for very low income, low-income seniors and hardship, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3496, "fingerprint": "2018|201800120|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800120|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0dbea4c19c3e1aac", "measure_id": "201800120", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Measure graduating the real estate transfer tax as follows: 1% up to $300,000; 1.5% over $300,000 \u2013 2,000,000; 1.75% over $2,000,000 \u2013 5,000,000; and 2.5% over $5,000,000; a lower rate for low-moderate income first-time homebuyers; and reducing the tax up to 1/3 for seismic retrofit or solar energy work costs incurred by low-moderate income homebuyers; raising approximately $9,000,000 annually until repealed, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 105301, "no_votes": 46256, "total_votes": 151557, "percent_yes": 69.4794697704494, "percent_no": 30.5205302295506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.998658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.489448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Measure graduating the real estate transfer tax as follows: 1% up to $300,000; 1.5% over $300,000 \u2013 2,000,000; 1.75% over $2,000,000 \u2013 5,000,000; and 2.5% over $5,000,000; a lower rate for low-moderate income first-time homebuyers; and reducing the tax up to 1/3 for seismic retrofit or solar energy work costs incurred by low-moderate income homebuyers; raising approximately $9,000,000 annually until repealed, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3497, "fingerprint": "2018|201800121|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800121|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2a9f53f1bae13f10", "measure_id": "201800121", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Measure amending Oakland\u2019s Just Yes Cause for Eviction Ordinance (\u201cOrdinance\u201d) to: (1) remove the exemption for owner occupied duplexes and triplexes; and (2) allow the City Council, without returning to the voters, to add limitations on a landlord\u2019s right to evict under the Ordinance, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 88065, "no_votes": 62820, "total_votes": 150885, "percent_yes": 58.36564270802267, "percent_no": 41.63435729197733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Oakland's Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance to remove th...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Oakland's Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance to remove the exemption for owner-occupied duplexes and triplexes, and gave the City Council authority to add additional limitations on landlord eviction rights without requiring voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.998982", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.489648", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Measure amending Oakland\u2019s Just Yes Cause for Eviction Ordinance (\u201cOrdinance\u201d) to: (1) remove the exemption for owner occupied duplexes and triplexes; and (2) allow the City Council, without returning to the voters, to add limitations on a landlord\u2019s right to evict under the Ordinance, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3498, "fingerprint": "2018|201800122|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800122|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f925cab4f5059ef9", "measure_id": "201800122", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending Oakland\u2019s Municipal Code to: (1) establish workplace protections and minimum hourly wage of $15 with benefits or $20 without benefits, increasing annually with inflation, for employees of Oakland hotels with 50 or more guest rooms; (2) authorize administrative enforcement of Oakland\u2019s employment standards for hotel and non-hotel workers; and (3) create City department to administratively enforce Oakland\u2019s employment standards for hotel and non-hotel workers, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 116980, "no_votes": 36350, "total_votes": 153330, "percent_yes": 76.29296289049762, "percent_no": 23.70703710950238, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a minimum wage of $15 per hour with benefits or $20 ...", "summary_text": "This measure established a minimum wage of $15 per hour with benefits or $20 per hour without benefits for employees at Oakland hotels with 50 or more rooms, with annual inflation adjustments. It also created a city department to administratively enforce employment standards for both hotel and non-hotel workers in Oakland.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:06.999253", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.489853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending Oakland\u2019s Municipal Code to: (1) establish workplace protections and minimum hourly wage of $15 with benefits or $20 without benefits, increasing annually with inflation, for employees of Oakland hotels with 50 or more guest rooms; (2) authorize administrative enforcement of Oakland\u2019s employment standards for hotel and non-hotel workers; and (3) create City department to administratively enforce Oakland\u2019s employment standards for hotel and non-hotel workers, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3509, "fingerprint": "2018|201800501|ALPINE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800501|ALPINE", "content_hash": "422d606ae964bc16", "measure_id": "201800501", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Alpine", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local school safety systems; provide accessibility for students with disabilities; update classrooms and improve technology to support quality instruction; update plumbing, heating, AC and electrical systems, shall Alpine County Unified School District issue $4,900,000 of bonds with an estimated $300,000 in taxes raised annually on average for 32 years at average projected tax rates of $28 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 402, "no_votes": 195, "total_votes": 597, "percent_yes": 67.33668341708542, "percent_no": 32.663316582914575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized Alpine County Unified School District to issue $4", "summary_text": "The measure authorized Alpine County Unified School District to issue $4.9 million in bonds to fund school safety improvements, accessibility upgrades for disabled students, classroom and technology updates, and infrastructure repairs to plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging $28 per $100,000 of assessed valuation over 32 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.002487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.492006", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local school safety systems; provide accessibility for students with disabilities; update classrooms and improve technology to support quality instruction; update plumbing, heating, AC and electrical systems, shall Alpine County Unified School District issue $4,900,000 of bonds with an estimated $300,000 in taxes raised annually on average for 32 years at average projected tax rates of $28 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alpine_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3510, "fingerprint": "2018|201800502|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800502|AMADOR", "content_hash": "131a53d7b6799d27", "measure_id": "201800502", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide well-rounded, high quality education to all local students, shall Amador County Unified School District upgrade career/technical education, science/computer labs/facilities; remove mold; repair leaky roofs; ensure fire/drinking water safety; construct, acquire facilities, sites/equipment to prepare students for college, vocational jobs/careers by issuing $78,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy an estimated average 5.9\u00a2/$100 of assessed value ($3,900,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with audits/oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8950, "no_votes": 8147, "total_votes": 17097, "percent_yes": 52.348365210270806, "percent_no": 47.651634789729194, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Amador County Unified School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Amador County Unified School District to issue $78 million in bonds to upgrade career and technical education facilities, science and computer labs, remove mold, repair roofs, ensure fire and water safety, and construct new facilities and acquire equipment. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 5.9 cents per $100 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.002816", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.492203", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide well-rounded, high quality education to all local students, shall Amador County Unified School District upgrade career/technical education, science/computer labs/facilities; remove mold; repair leaky roofs; ensure fire/drinking water safety; construct, acquire facilities, sites/equipment to prepare students for college, vocational jobs/careers by issuing $78,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy an estimated average 5.9\u00a2/$100 of assessed value ($3,900,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with audits/oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3517, "fingerprint": "2018|201800505|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800505|BUTTE", "content_hash": "be402144364a9dcc", "measure_id": "201800505", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/improve aging local schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, replace leaking roofs, outdated heating, air conditioning, electrical/plumbing; remove asbestos/dry rot; upgrade outdated classrooms, science labs/technology; improve safety/security systems; acquire, construct, equip facilities, shall Marysville Joint Unified School District measure be adopted to issue $74,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average 5.634\u00a2/$100 assessed value ($4,187,470 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits/oversight, no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95, "no_votes": 75, "total_votes": 170, "percent_yes": 55.88235294117647, "percent_no": 44.11764705882353, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Marysville Joint Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Marysville Joint Unified School District to issue $74 million in bonds to fund school facility repairs and improvements, including roof replacements, HVAC updates, classroom upgrades, and safety system enhancements. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging 5.634 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.005030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.493617", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/improve aging local schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, replace leaking roofs, outdated heating, air conditioning, electrical/plumbing; remove asbestos/dry rot; upgrade outdated classrooms, science labs/technology; improve safety/security systems; acquire, construct, equip facilities, shall Marysville Joint Unified School District measure be adopted to issue $74,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average 5.634\u00a2/$100 assessed value ($4,187,470 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits/oversight, no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3511, "fingerprint": "2018|201800127|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800127|BUTTE", "content_hash": "ba2a93dd7c110c6f", "measure_id": "201800127", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 401 of the Chico City Charter be amended to limit the members of the Chico City Council to no more than three (3) consecutive terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23750, "no_votes": 10460, "total_votes": 34210, "percent_yes": 69.42414498684595, "percent_no": 30.575855013154055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure amended Section 401 of the Chico City Charter to impose a...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure amended Section 401 of the Chico City Charter to impose a limit of three consecutive terms for City Council members. The measure passed with 69.4% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.003083", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.492407", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 401 of the Chico City Charter be amended to limit the members of the Chico City Council to no more than three (3) consecutive terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3512, "fingerprint": "2018|201800128|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800128|BUTTE", "content_hash": "384e2e31e0bdac74", "measure_id": "201800128", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For unrestricted general revenue purposes such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City of Oroville adopt an ordinance authorizing an annual business tax on cannabis businesses upon gross receipts at a rate not to exceed 10%, with initial rates of 5% on retailers and manufacturers; 4% on cultivators; 3% on distributors; 2% on nurseries; 0% on testing laboratories; and 7% on microbusiness generating approximately $300,000 to $600,000 annually until repealed by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2715, "no_votes": 1817, "total_votes": 4532, "percent_yes": 59.90732568402471, "percent_no": 40.09267431597529, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the City of Oroville to impose an annual business tax ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the City of Oroville to impose an annual business tax on cannabis businesses based on gross receipts, with rates ranging from 0% for testing laboratories to 7% for microbusinesses, not exceeding 10% for any category. The tax is estimated to generate $300,000 to $600,000 annually for general city services including police, fire, roads, and recreation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.003349", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.492599", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For unrestricted general revenue purposes such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City of Oroville adopt an ordinance authorizing an annual business tax on cannabis businesses upon gross receipts at a rate not to exceed 10%, with initial rates of 5% on retailers and manufacturers; 4% on cultivators; 3% on distributors; 2% on nurseries; 0% on testing laboratories; and 7% on microbusiness generating approximately $300,000 to $600,000 annually until repealed by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3513, "fingerprint": "2018|201800129|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800129|BUTTE", "content_hash": "6763c07d4ce8a04e", "measure_id": "201800129", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent cuts and restore essential public safety services, including 911 response, police officers, gang/youth violence prevention, fire protection/emergency medical response, and other essential services including street repairs, youth/senior services and park maintenance, shall the City enact a one cent sales tax providing approximately three million seven hundred thousand dollars annually with all revenue required to stay in the general fund, with local control and independent annual financial audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2563, "no_votes": 1980, "total_votes": 4543, "percent_yes": 56.416464891041166, "percent_no": 43.583535108958834, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a one-cent sales tax in Butte, California to generate ap...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a one-cent sales tax in Butte, California to generate approximately $3.7 million annually for the city's general fund to support public safety services, street repairs, and other municipal services. The measure included requirements for annual financial audits and citizen oversight of the tax revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.003751", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.492806", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent cuts and restore essential public safety services, including 911 response, police officers, gang/youth violence prevention, fire protection/emergency medical response, and other essential services including street repairs, youth/senior services and park maintenance, shall the City enact a one cent sales tax providing approximately three million seven hundred thousand dollars annually with all revenue required to stay in the general fund, with local control and independent annual financial audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3514, "fingerprint": "2018|201800130|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800130|BUTTE", "content_hash": "57ff73d52ac55b8b", "measure_id": "201800130", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve Town of Paradise police protection, fire suppression, road improvements, animal control and other services, with required review by the citizen oversight committee; shall the Town\u2019s existing temporary half percent transactions and use tax be extended for ten years to March 31, 2031 pursuant to Ordinance No. 569?  (Projected tax revenues are $1.4 million per year.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8349, "no_votes": 3662, "total_votes": 12011, "percent_yes": 69.51128132545166, "percent_no": 30.488718674548338, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended Paradise's existing temporary 0", "summary_text": "This measure extended Paradise's existing temporary 0.5% sales tax for ten years until March 31, 2031, to fund police protection, fire suppression, road improvements, animal control and other municipal services. The tax is projected to generate approximately $1.4 million annually and includes citizen oversight committee review.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.004127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.493006", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve Town of Paradise police protection, fire suppression, road improvements, animal control and other services, with required review by the citizen oversight committee; shall the Town\u2019s existing temporary half percent transactions and use tax be extended for ten years to March 31, 2031 pursuant to Ordinance No. 569?  (Projected tax revenues are $1.4 million per year.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3515, "fingerprint": "2018|201800503|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800503|BUTTE", "content_hash": "df434d5e44bf528c", "measure_id": "201800503", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, construct new gymnasium, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade classroom technology; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall the Biggs Unified School District issue $9.5 million of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $624,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits,  citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 656, "no_votes": 559, "total_votes": 1215, "percent_yes": 53.99176954732511, "percent_no": 46.00823045267489, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Biggs Unified School District to issue $9", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Biggs Unified School District to issue $9.5 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom modernization, construction of a new gymnasium and restrooms, technology upgrades, and health and safety improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 4.7 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.004404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.493212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, construct new gymnasium, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade classroom technology; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall the Biggs Unified School District issue $9.5 million of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $624,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits,  citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3516, "fingerprint": "2018|201800504|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800504|BUTTE", "content_hash": "443931cbad87394e", "measure_id": "201800504", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace deteriorating electrical, plumbing and sewer systems; upgrade agriculture and vocational teaching facilities; repair leaky roofs; and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Durham Unified School District issue $19,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $1,100,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding from levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1565, "no_votes": 875, "total_votes": 2440, "percent_yes": 64.13934426229508, "percent_no": 35.86065573770492, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Durham Unified School District to issue $19", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Durham Unified School District to issue $19.7 million in bonds to fund school facility repairs and improvements, including electrical, plumbing, and sewer system upgrades, roof repairs, and classroom renovations. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.004749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.493415", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace deteriorating electrical, plumbing and sewer systems; upgrade agriculture and vocational teaching facilities; repair leaky roofs; and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Durham Unified School District issue $19,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $1,100,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding from levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3518, "fingerprint": "2018|201800506|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800506|BUTTE", "content_hash": "a62ffc166162450c", "measure_id": "201800506", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update classrooms and science labs in schools; perform essential safety/security upgrades; fix leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing/septic systems; equip classrooms with 21st-century learning technology; replace aging heating/plumbing; and construct/equip classrooms, shall Paradise Unified School District issue $61,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, levy $57.50 per $100,000 of assessed value for as long as bonds are outstanding ($3.5 million annually) with taxpayer oversight, audits, no employee salaries, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10351, "no_votes": 6521, "total_votes": 16872, "percent_yes": 61.35016595542911, "percent_no": 38.64983404457089, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Paradise Unified School District to issue $61 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Paradise Unified School District to issue $61 million in bonds to fund classroom updates, science lab improvements, safety and security upgrades, infrastructure repairs, and technology equipment. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of $57.50 per $100,000 of assessed value for the duration of the bond repayment period.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.005297", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.493816", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update classrooms and science labs in schools; perform essential safety/security upgrades; fix leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing/septic systems; equip classrooms with 21st-century learning technology; replace aging heating/plumbing; and construct/equip classrooms, shall Paradise Unified School District issue $61,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, levy $57.50 per $100,000 of assessed value for as long as bonds are outstanding ($3.5 million annually) with taxpayer oversight, audits, no employee salaries, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3519, "fingerprint": "2018|201800507|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800507|BUTTE", "content_hash": "cfc962e548777f0e", "measure_id": "201800507", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, repair or replace leaky roofs, modernize/renovate classrooms and restrooms, upgrade inadequate electrical systems, replace aging plumbing systems, and replace temporary portables with classrooms, shall Thermalito Union Elementary School District issue $4.5 million of bonds at legal interest rates, generating an average of $277,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1663, "no_votes": 1088, "total_votes": 2751, "percent_yes": 60.45074518356961, "percent_no": 39.54925481643039, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Thermalito Union Elementary School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Thermalito Union Elementary School District to issue $4.5 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including roof repairs, classroom and restroom renovations, electrical and plumbing upgrades, and replacement of temporary buildings. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.005569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.494013", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, repair or replace leaky roofs, modernize/renovate classrooms and restrooms, upgrade inadequate electrical systems, replace aging plumbing systems, and replace temporary portables with classrooms, shall Thermalito Union Elementary School District issue $4.5 million of bonds at legal interest rates, generating an average of $277,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3521, "fingerprint": "2018|201800131|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800131|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "201800131", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 583, "no_votes": 604, "total_votes": 1187, "percent_yes": 49.11541701769166, "percent_no": 50.88458298230834, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the City Clerk and City Treasurer positions i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the City Clerk and City Treasurer positions in Calaveras from elected offices to positions appointed by the city government. The measure failed with 49.1% support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.006208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.494419", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3522, "fingerprint": "2018|201800132|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800132|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "1711702b3bdb98ae", "measure_id": "201800132", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure imposing a one half percent (0.5%) sales tax, raising an estimated $400,000 annually, to fund essential City facilities and general City services, such as streets and sidewalk maintenance, fire and police services, and parks and museums; and to increase the City's appropriations limit for Fiscal Years 2019-2023 by the amount of tax proceeds received by the increase, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1078, "no_votes": 668, "total_votes": 1746, "percent_yes": 61.74112256586484, "percent_no": 38.25887743413516, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a 0.5% sales tax in Calaveras, California, raising an estimated $400,000 annually to fund city facilities and services including street maintenance, fire and police services, and parks and museums. The measure also would have increased the city's appropriations limit for fiscal years 2019-2023 by the amount of tax revenue generated.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.006508", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.494615", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure imposing a one half percent (0.5%) sales tax, raising an estimated $400,000 annually, to fund essential City facilities and general City services, such as streets and sidewalk maintenance, fire and police services, and parks and museums; and to increase the City's appropriations limit for Fiscal Years 2019-2023 by the amount of tax proceeds received by the increase, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3523, "fingerprint": "2018|201800508|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800508|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "8bd598b728154d49", "measure_id": "201800508", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, construct, equip, repair and improve classrooms and school facilities, including deteriorating roofs, heating and air conditioning systems, and construct a new multi-purpose room, shall Vallecito Union School District issue $11,000,000 in bonds under a no-tax-rate-increase-financing-plan, with an estimated levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation averaging $1.1 million raised per year anticipated through 2036, at legal rates, with annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3374, "no_votes": 1711, "total_votes": 5085, "percent_yes": 66.3520157325467, "percent_no": 33.647984267453296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Vallecito Union School District to issue $11 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Vallecito Union School District to issue $11 million in bonds to renovate, construct, equip, repair and improve classrooms and school facilities, including deteriorating roofs, heating and air conditioning systems, and construct a new multi-purpose room. The bonds would be repaid through an estimated property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $1.1 million annually through 2036.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.006771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.494806", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, construct, equip, repair and improve classrooms and school facilities, including deteriorating roofs, heating and air conditioning systems, and construct a new multi-purpose room, shall Vallecito Union School District issue $11,000,000 in bonds under a no-tax-rate-increase-financing-plan, with an estimated levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation averaging $1.1 million raised per year anticipated through 2036, at legal rates, with annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3520, "fingerprint": "2018|201800003|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800003|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "dcad9dfe86819dbe", "measure_id": "201800003", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure to maintain and improve essential Calaveras County services including emergency fire district response and protection, Sheriff\u2019s patrols helping prevent thefts/burglaries, road/pothole repairs, attracting/retaining businesses and other County services and infrastructure by increasing the transient occupancy tax (paid only by hotel/motel/short-term rental guests) from 6% to 12%, providing approximately $600,000 annually until ended by voters, with audits, and all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13203, "no_votes": 7723, "total_votes": 20926, "percent_yes": 63.09375896014527, "percent_no": 36.90624103985473, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Calaveras County's transient occupancy tax from 6% to ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Calaveras County's transient occupancy tax from 6% to 12% on hotel, motel, and short-term rental stays to generate approximately $600,000 annually for county services including fire protection, sheriff patrols, and road maintenance. The tax increase applies only to visitors staying in temporary accommodations and requires audits with all funds used locally.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.005902", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.494213", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to maintain and improve essential Calaveras County services including emergency fire district response and protection, Sheriff\u2019s patrols helping prevent thefts/burglaries, road/pothole repairs, attracting/retaining businesses and other County services and infrastructure by increasing the transient occupancy tax (paid only by hotel/motel/short-term rental guests) from 6% to 12%, providing approximately $600,000 annually until ended by voters, with audits, and all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3524, "fingerprint": "2018|201800004|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800004|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6f9deb6abf9fc8ec", "measure_id": "201800004", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide for road, bridge, culvert and trail maintenance and improvements, and security/police protection services for the community, shall the Diablo Community Services District adopt an ordinance to levy an annual special tax upon taxable properties within the District at a rate of $662.26 per improved parcel, $128.06 per unimproved parcel, and $23,444.68 for Diablo Country Club parcels, including an annual inflation adjustment, providing $285,000/year initially, and replace the existing fees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 191, "no_votes": 91, "total_votes": 282, "percent_yes": 67.73049645390071, "percent_no": 32.26950354609929, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Diablo Community Services District to levy an ann...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Diablo Community Services District to levy an annual special tax on properties at rates of $662.26 per improved parcel, $128.06 per unimproved parcel, and $23,444.68 for Diablo Country Club parcels, with annual inflation adjustments. The tax would fund road, bridge, culvert and trail maintenance and improvements, as well as security and police protection services, generating approximately $285,000 annually while replacing existing fees.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-03-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.007032", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.494998", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide for road, bridge, culvert and trail maintenance and improvements, and security/police protection services for the community, shall the Diablo Community Services District adopt an ordinance to levy an annual special tax upon taxable properties within the District at a rate of $662.26 per improved parcel, $128.06 per unimproved parcel, and $23,444.68 for Diablo Country Club parcels, including an annual inflation adjustment, providing $285,000/year initially, and replace the existing fees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3539, "fingerprint": "2018|201800143|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800143|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "11a13a19027bd838", "measure_id": "201800143", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without raising current tax rates, and to maintain City services including Police and Fire protection, 9-1-1 emergency services, park maintenance and repair, youth and senior recreation services, other community services, and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the existing Utility Users Tax at the current rate of 8%, until voters otherwise decide, providing approximately $2,000,000 annually that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5404, "no_votes": 1963, "total_votes": 7367, "percent_yes": 73.35414687118231, "percent_no": 26.64585312881769, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would continue an existing 8% utility users tax in Contra Costa ...", "summary_text": "This measure would continue an existing 8% utility users tax in Contra Costa at the current rate, generating approximately $2 million annually for general city services including police, fire, emergency services, parks, and recreation programs. The tax would remain in effect indefinitely until voters decide to change it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.011242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.497935", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without raising current tax rates, and to maintain City services including Police and Fire protection, 9-1-1 emergency services, park maintenance and repair, youth and senior recreation services, other community services, and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the existing Utility Users Tax at the current rate of 8%, until voters otherwise decide, providing approximately $2,000,000 annually that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11173, "fingerprint": "2018|201800511|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800511|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d578ed04af3db55e", "measure_id": "201800511", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update science, technology, engineering, art and math classrooms/labs at all schools; maintain libraries; upgrade technology infrastructure; construct, acquire, repair classrooms/facilities, sites/equipment, shall this Orinda Union School District measure authorizing $50,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value, averaging $2,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no administrator salaries, all funds controlled locally, and all funds for Orinda schools only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7607, "no_votes": 3280, "total_votes": 10887, "percent_yes": 69.87232479103518, "percent_no": 30.127675208964817, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Orinda Union School District to issue $50 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Orinda Union School District to issue $50 million in bonds to update STEAM classrooms and labs, maintain libraries, upgrade technology infrastructure, and construct or repair school facilities and equipment. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $2.9 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.522937", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.012790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.503105", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update science, technology, engineering, art and math classrooms/labs at all schools; maintain libraries; upgrade technology infrastructure; construct, acquire, repair classrooms/facilities, sites/equipment, shall this Orinda Union School District measure authorizing $50,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value, averaging $2,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no administrator salaries, all funds controlled locally, and all funds for Orinda schools only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3534, "fingerprint": "2018|201800138|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800138|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b3c7d8d8a7a50671", "measure_id": "201800138", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to provide that a portion of general fund money shall be set aside for funding youth programs and services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12843, "no_votes": 3916, "total_votes": 16759, "percent_yes": 76.63345068321499, "percent_no": 23.36654931678501, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires the City of Richmond to set aside a portion o...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires the City of Richmond to set aside a portion of its general fund money specifically for funding youth programs and services. The measure passed with 76.6% voter approval in 2018.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.009825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.496952", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to provide that a portion of general fund money shall be set aside for funding youth programs and services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3531, "fingerprint": "2018|201800135|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800135|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ac77ee9355833bef", "measure_id": "201800135", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Martinez adopt the Measure Designating and Protecting Public Permanent Open Space and Park and Recreation Lands and Requiring Voter Approval of any Changes to those protections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5349, "no_votes": 5240, "total_votes": 10589, "percent_yes": 50.514685050524136, "percent_no": 49.485314949475864, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure designates and protects certain public lands in Martinez as perm...", "summary_text": "This measure designates and protects certain public lands in Martinez as permanent open space and park/recreation areas, and requires voter approval for any future changes to those protections.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.009031", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.496360", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Martinez adopt the Measure Designating and Protecting Public Permanent Open Space and Park and Recreation Lands and Requiring Voter Approval of any Changes to those protections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3528, "fingerprint": "2018|201800008|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800008|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2f526d81f34d7293", "measure_id": "201800008", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 be established at $4,375,000.00 and the limit for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 (i.e., $4,375,000.00) be used to determine the limits for Fiscal Years 2019-2020 through 2022-2023?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2395, "no_votes": 500, "total_votes": 2895, "percent_yes": 82.72884283246978, "percent_no": 17.27115716753022, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established the Kensington Police Protection and Community Servi...", "summary_text": "This measure established the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District's appropriations limit at $4,375,000 for fiscal year 2018-2019 and set that amount as the baseline for calculating spending limits through fiscal year 2022-2023.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.008151", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.495779", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 be established at $4,375,000.00 and the limit for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 (i.e., $4,375,000.00) be used to determine the limits for Fiscal Years 2019-2020 through 2022-2023?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3540, "fingerprint": "2018|201800144|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800144|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d669c94634da88f2", "measure_id": "201800144", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance amending the City of Richmond\u2019s Municipal Code, changing the Real Estate Documentary Transfer Tax so the tax rate for properties below $1 million does not increase, the rate for properties between $1 million to $3 million increases from .7% to 1.25%; the rate for properties between $3 million to $10 million increases from .7% to 2.5%; and the rate for properties over $10 million increases from .7% to 3.0%, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19630, "no_votes": 10623, "total_votes": 30253, "percent_yes": 64.88612699566984, "percent_no": 35.11387300433016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Richmond's real estate transfer tax to create a tiered r...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Richmond's real estate transfer tax to create a tiered rate structure, keeping the existing rate for properties under $1 million while increasing rates to 1.25% for properties $1-3 million, 2.5% for properties $3-10 million, and 3.0% for properties over $10 million, up from the previous flat rate of 0.7% for higher-value properties.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.011512", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.502198", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance amending the City of Richmond\u2019s Municipal Code, changing the Real Estate Documentary Transfer Tax so the tax rate for properties below $1 million does not increase, the rate for properties between $1 million to $3 million increases from .7% to 1.25%; the rate for properties between $3 million to $10 million increases from .7% to 2.5%; and the rate for properties over $10 million increases from .7% to 3.0%, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11174, "fingerprint": "2018|201800512|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800512|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "cee079e2bf252a62", "measure_id": "201800512", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classroom air conditioning, electrical, fire safety, security lighting, communications/camera systems, classroom locks; update science, technology, engineering, art, math classrooms; construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Orinda Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $55,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value, averaging $3,200,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no administrator salaries, all funds for Orinda schools only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7158, "no_votes": 3622, "total_votes": 10780, "percent_yes": 66.40074211502784, "percent_no": 33.59925788497216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Orinda Union School District to issue $55 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Orinda Union School District to issue $55 million in bonds to upgrade school infrastructure including air conditioning, safety systems, and STEM classrooms, as well as construct and repair facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.523123", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.013060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.503289", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classroom air conditioning, electrical, fire safety, security lighting, communications/camera systems, classroom locks; update science, technology, engineering, art, math classrooms; construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Orinda Union School District\u2019s measure authorizing $55,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value, averaging $3,200,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no administrator salaries, all funds for Orinda schools only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3530, "fingerprint": "2018|201800134|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800134|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "460ef9ce83681d76", "measure_id": "201800134", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City of Martinez adopt the Initiative Measure Amending the Martinez General Plan to Create a Protected Open Space and Parks Overlay Designation, Apply the Overlay to Certain Properties as Set Forth in the 1973 General Plan and Adopt Land Use Regulations Relating Thereto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5452, "no_votes": 5055, "total_votes": 10507, "percent_yes": 51.88921671266774, "percent_no": 48.11078328733226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended Martinez's General Plan to create a protected open space ...", "summary_text": "The measure amended Martinez's General Plan to create a protected open space and parks overlay designation and applied this protection to certain properties identified in the city's 1973 General Plan. It also established land use regulations to govern these protected areas.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.008712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.496167", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City of Martinez adopt the Initiative Measure Amending the Martinez General Plan to Create a Protected Open Space and Parks Overlay Designation, Apply the Overlay to Certain Properties as Set Forth in the 1973 General Plan and Adopt Land Use Regulations Relating Thereto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11172, "fingerprint": "2018|201800510|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800510|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b56d4818ec47528f", "measure_id": "201800510", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve and upgrade science, engineering, technology and vocational education classrooms; replace outdated plumbing /electrical wiring, upgrade alarm /emergency communication systems; improve student safety /campus security; and qualify for State matching funds, shall Mount Diablo Unified School District issue $150 million of bonds with an estimated levy of $15 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, averaging $15 million per year while bonds are outstanding, with legal rates, annual audits, independent oversight and local control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68442, "no_votes": 28908, "total_votes": 97350, "percent_yes": 70.30508474576271, "percent_no": 29.694915254237287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Mount Diablo Unified School District to issue $15...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Mount Diablo Unified School District to issue $150 million in bonds to upgrade science, engineering, technology and vocational education facilities, replace outdated infrastructure, and improve safety and security systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $15 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.522751", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.012419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.502921", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve and upgrade science, engineering, technology and vocational education classrooms; replace outdated plumbing /electrical wiring, upgrade alarm /emergency communication systems; improve student safety /campus security; and qualify for State matching funds, shall Mount Diablo Unified School District issue $150 million of bonds with an estimated levy of $15 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, averaging $15 million per year while bonds are outstanding, with legal rates, annual audits, independent oversight and local control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3532, "fingerprint": "2018|201800136|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800136|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "9ef30b3416ca3855", "measure_id": "201800136", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain hours and services; replace worn and outdated materials; undertake building maintenance and repairs; and continue library programs for children, families, and seniors, shall the City of Orinda be authorized to modify the existing thirty-nine dollar annual tax, adding thirty dollars per single family residential parcel, or equivalent unit, so that the amended tax raises a total of five hundred fourteen thousand dollars annually for the Orinda Library, until amended by voters, with audits and oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5488, "no_votes": 1843, "total_votes": 7331, "percent_yes": 74.86018278543173, "percent_no": 25.139817214568268, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the City of Orinda to increase the existing $39 annual...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the City of Orinda to increase the existing $39 annual library tax by $30 per single family residential parcel, raising the total annual tax to $69 per parcel to generate $514,000 annually for the Orinda Library. The increased tax would fund library hours, services, materials, building maintenance, and programs for children, families, and seniors.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.009295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.496551", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain hours and services; replace worn and outdated materials; undertake building maintenance and repairs; and continue library programs for children, families, and seniors, shall the City of Orinda be authorized to modify the existing thirty-nine dollar annual tax, adding thirty dollars per single family residential parcel, or equivalent unit, so that the amended tax raises a total of five hundred fourteen thousand dollars annually for the Orinda Library, until amended by voters, with audits and oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3535, "fingerprint": "2018|201800139|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800139|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "9f71968f93edee27", "measure_id": "201800139", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond, if amended by passage of the Kids First Initiative, be further amended to: revise the dates in the Kids First Initiative to reflect implementation on July 1, 2018, remove the 20% restriction on funding to public entities to perform the services specified in the Kids First Initiative, and provide that funding obligations beginning on July 1, 2021, are contingent on passage of a general tax measure for the City of Richmond?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10888, "no_votes": 5255, "total_votes": 16143, "percent_yes": 67.44719073282536, "percent_no": 32.55280926717464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Richmond's charter to change implementation dates for th...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Richmond's charter to change implementation dates for the Kids First Initiative to July 1, 2018, eliminate restrictions on funding public entities to provide specified services, and make funding obligations after July 1, 2021 dependent on passage of a general tax measure.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.010086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.497142", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond, if amended by passage of the Kids First Initiative, be further amended to: revise the dates in the Kids First Initiative to reflect implementation on July 1, 2018, remove the 20% restriction on funding to public entities to perform the services specified in the Kids First Initiative, and provide that funding obligations beginning on July 1, 2021, are contingent on passage of a general tax measure for the City of Richmond?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3529, "fingerprint": "2018|201800133|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800133|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "031f15666a2a1930", "measure_id": "201800133", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the legislative actions in Ordinance #641 approving the Homes at Deer Hill Project, which include a rezone from Administrative/Professional Office (35 units/acre) to Single Family Residential District-20 (2 units/acre) and to Planned Unit Development to provide 44 single-family homes, and a Development Agreement to provide 11 acres, which include parklands, a sports field, a dog park, a tot-lot and a multi-use trail, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4421, "no_votes": 5300, "total_votes": 9721, "percent_yes": 45.47886019956794, "percent_no": 54.52113980043206, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have approved the Homes at Deer Hill Project, which include...", "summary_text": "The measure would have approved the Homes at Deer Hill Project, which included rezoning land from office use to residential use and establishing a planned development for 44 single-family homes. It also would have approved a development agreement providing 11 acres of parklands, recreational facilities, and trails.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.008413", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.495975", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the legislative actions in Ordinance #641 approving the Homes at Deer Hill Project, which include a rezone from Administrative/Professional Office (35 units/acre) to Single Family Residential District-20 (2 units/acre) and to Planned Unit Development to provide 44 single-family homes, and a Development Agreement to provide 11 acres, which include parklands, a sports field, a dog park, a tot-lot and a multi-use trail, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11175, "fingerprint": "2018|201800513|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800513|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "bd0fcb00e80d9257", "measure_id": "201800513", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to provide safe, modern neighborhood schools with updated computer technology and improve student learning by upgrading, constructing and equipping classrooms, science labs, District office facilities and workforce housing, shall the Pittsburg Unified School District issue $100,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average of $6,350,000 annually for 36 years at average projected tax rates of $55.25 per $100,000 of assessed value and approved bonding limits with independent oversight and all funds benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9295, "no_votes": 5045, "total_votes": 14340, "percent_yes": 64.8186889818689, "percent_no": 35.1813110181311, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Pittsburg Unified School District to issue $100 mi...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Pittsburg Unified School District to issue $100 million in bonds to upgrade, construct, and equip school facilities including classrooms, science labs, district offices, and workforce housing. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of $55.25 per $100,000 of assessed value over 36 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.523316", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.013362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.503487", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to provide safe, modern neighborhood schools with updated computer technology and improve student learning by upgrading, constructing and equipping classrooms, science labs, District office facilities and workforce housing, shall the Pittsburg Unified School District issue $100,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average of $6,350,000 annually for 36 years at average projected tax rates of $55.25 per $100,000 of assessed value and approved bonding limits with independent oversight and all funds benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3533, "fingerprint": "2018|201800137|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800137|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "dd6bb28282859773", "measure_id": "201800137", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City\u2019s ordinance limiting the number of successive terms of members of the Pinole City Council be eliminated? A \u201cyes\u201d vote will eliminate the City\u2019s existing term limits for Council members. A \u201cno\u201d vote will keep the City\u2019s existing term limits for Council members in effect.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 924, "no_votes": 3446, "total_votes": 4370, "percent_yes": 21.1441647597254, "percent_no": 78.8558352402746, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have eliminated Pinole's existing term limits that restric...", "summary_text": "This measure would have eliminated Pinole's existing term limits that restrict the number of successive terms City Council members can serve.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.009564", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.496750", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City\u2019s ordinance limiting the number of successive terms of members of the Pinole City Council be eliminated? A \u201cyes\u201d vote will eliminate the City\u2019s existing term limits for Council members. A \u201cno\u201d vote will keep the City\u2019s existing term limits for Council members in effect.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3542, "fingerprint": "2018|201800509|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800509|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "9f57054b0b77cfe7", "measure_id": "201800509", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education and provide over $850,000 in annual local school funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Martinez Unified School District attract and retain qualified teachers; maintain math, science, technology, engineering, reading/ writing programs; protect art/ music; keep school libraries open; and maintain school counselors by renewing for 5 years local school funding at the current $50 rate plus $25 per parcel with senior exemptions, independent citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds supporting Martinez students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10135, "no_votes": 3032, "total_votes": 13167, "percent_yes": 76.97273486747171, "percent_no": 23.027265132528285, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed a local parcel tax for Martinez Unified School District ...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed a local parcel tax for Martinez Unified School District at $75 per parcel ($50 existing rate plus $25 increase) for five years to fund educational programs including math, science, technology, arts, libraries, and school counselors. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and requires independent oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.012050", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.502726", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education and provide over $850,000 in annual local school funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Martinez Unified School District attract and retain qualified teachers; maintain math, science, technology, engineering, reading/ writing programs; protect art/ music; keep school libraries open; and maintain school counselors by renewing for 5 years local school funding at the current $50 rate plus $25 per parcel with senior exemptions, independent citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds supporting Martinez students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3527, "fingerprint": "2018|201800007|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800007|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5cf5896a47e43a9b", "measure_id": "201800007", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses in the unincorporated area at annual rates up to $7.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation) and up to 4% of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses including retailers, to generate an estimated $1.7 to $4.4 million annually to fund general County expenses such as public safety, health services, and environmental protection, and levied until repealed by the voters or Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 289223, "no_votes": 115599, "total_votes": 404822, "percent_yes": 71.44448671267865, "percent_no": 28.555513287321347, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Contra Costa County to tax cannabis businesses in uni...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Contra Costa County to tax cannabis businesses in unincorporated areas at rates up to $7.00 per square foot for cultivation and up to 4% of gross receipts for other cannabis businesses. The tax revenue would fund general county expenses including public safety, health services, and environmental protection, with an estimated annual yield of $1.7 to $4.4 million.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.007881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.495587", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses in the unincorporated area at annual rates up to $7.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation) and up to 4% of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses including retailers, to generate an estimated $1.7 to $4.4 million annually to fund general County expenses such as public safety, health services, and environmental protection, and levied until repealed by the voters or Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3525, "fingerprint": "2018|201800005|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800005|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f4af79b0371f2d65", "measure_id": "201800005", "measure_letter": "RM3", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 101070, "no_votes": 125851, "total_votes": 226921, "percent_yes": 44.53972968566153, "percent_no": 55.46027031433847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased tolls by $1 in 2019, 2022, and 2025 on all ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased tolls by $1 in 2019, 2022, and 2025 on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge to fund transportation improvements including BART, bus, ferry, and commuter rail service enhancements. The measure failed with 44.5% support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.007353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.495194", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3526, "fingerprint": "2018|201800006|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800006|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e2c35b84eb402fb8", "measure_id": "201800006", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall County of Contra Costa Ordinance No. 2018-08 be approved to authorize an increase in the special tax on property located in County Service Area P-5 from a maximum of $732 per parcel for parcels used for recreational purposes, and a maximum of $330 per parcel for all other parcels, to an initial amount of $812 per parcel for all parcels, with annual CPI adjustments, to provide additional funding for police protection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 261, "no_votes": 350, "total_votes": 611, "percent_yes": 42.71685761047463, "percent_no": 57.28314238952537, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased property taxes in Contra Costa County Servi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased property taxes in Contra Costa County Service Area P-5 from varying amounts ($732 for recreational parcels, $330 for others) to a uniform $812 per parcel with annual inflation adjustments to fund additional police services. The measure failed with 42.7% support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.007620", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.495393", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall County of Contra Costa Ordinance No. 2018-08 be approved to authorize an increase in the special tax on property located in County Service Area P-5 from a maximum of $732 per parcel for parcels used for recreational purposes, and a maximum of $330 per parcel for all other parcels, to an initial amount of $812 per parcel for all parcels, with annual CPI adjustments, to provide additional funding for police protection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3541, "fingerprint": "2018|201800145|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800145|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2f58bdb88537db19", "measure_id": "201800145", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance of the City of Richmond\u2019s Municipal Code to establish a Special Parcel Tax on Vacant Properties at the rate of $3,000 annually per vacant developed parcel and $6,000 annually per vacant undeveloped parcel, raising about $5.4 million annually for 20 years to fund homelessness services and housing, blight and dumping elimination, and specified programs, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17937, "no_votes": 11843, "total_votes": 29780, "percent_yes": 60.23169912693083, "percent_no": 39.76830087306917, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a special parcel tax on vacant properties...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a special parcel tax on vacant properties in Richmond, charging $3,000 annually for vacant developed parcels and $6,000 for vacant undeveloped parcels. The tax was intended to raise approximately $5.4 million annually for 20 years to fund homelessness services, housing programs, and blight elimination.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.011781", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.502528", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance of the City of Richmond\u2019s Municipal Code to establish a Special Parcel Tax on Vacant Properties at the rate of $3,000 annually per vacant developed parcel and $6,000 annually per vacant undeveloped parcel, raising about $5.4 million annually for 20 years to fund homelessness services and housing, blight and dumping elimination, and specified programs, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3537, "fingerprint": "2018|201800141|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800141|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6c4b3f9313809c6e", "measure_id": "201800141", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To better maintain emergency 911 fire, medical and police services and response times; city parks, paths, playfields, and open space; programs for children, adults, and families; library programs; earthquake and disaster preparedness programs and reserves; other general services, shall a measure be adopted establishing El Cerrito as a Charter City and an ongoing real estate property transfer tax of $12 per $1,000, paid by buyers or sellers of property, providing $2,700,000 annually, all benefiting El Cerrito?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6691, "no_votes": 5593, "total_votes": 12284, "percent_yes": 54.46922826440898, "percent_no": 45.53077173559102, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established El Cerrito as a charter city and imposed a real esta...", "summary_text": "This measure established El Cerrito as a charter city and imposed a real estate transfer tax of $12 per $1,000 of property value, paid by buyers or sellers during property transactions. The tax was projected to generate approximately $2.7 million annually for general city services including emergency services, parks, library programs, and disaster preparedness.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.010711", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.497536", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better maintain emergency 911 fire, medical and police services and response times; city parks, paths, playfields, and open space; programs for children, adults, and families; library programs; earthquake and disaster preparedness programs and reserves; other general services, shall a measure be adopted establishing El Cerrito as a Charter City and an ongoing real estate property transfer tax of $12 per $1,000, paid by buyers or sellers of property, providing $2,700,000 annually, all benefiting El Cerrito?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3536, "fingerprint": "2018|201800140|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800140|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "83a819e7c9987930", "measure_id": "201800140", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain Antioch\u2019s fiscal stability, police patrols, 911 emergency response, youth violence prevention programs; ensuring water quality/safety; repairing streets; cleaning up parks/illegal dumping; restoring youth afterschool/summer programs; other essential services; shall the measure be adopted approving an ordinance to renew the sales tax at the one cent rate, raising approximately $14,000,000 annually, expiring in twenty years, with mandatory annual independent financial audits, and independent citizens oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19504, "no_votes": 9997, "total_votes": 29501, "percent_yes": 66.11301311819938, "percent_no": 33.886986881800624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure renews a one-cent sales tax in Antioch for twenty years, generati...", "summary_text": "The measure renews a one-cent sales tax in Antioch for twenty years, generating approximately $14 million annually for city services including police, emergency response, street repairs, parks maintenance, and youth programs. The measure includes requirements for annual independent financial audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.010443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.497335", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain Antioch\u2019s fiscal stability, police patrols, 911 emergency response, youth violence prevention programs; ensuring water quality/safety; repairing streets; cleaning up parks/illegal dumping; restoring youth afterschool/summer programs; other essential services; shall the measure be adopted approving an ordinance to renew the sales tax at the one cent rate, raising approximately $14,000,000 annually, expiring in twenty years, with mandatory annual independent financial audits, and independent citizens oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3538, "fingerprint": "2018|201800142|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800142|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b90ab85aec8eaba6", "measure_id": "201800142", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain 911 police emergency response times; violent crime prevention/property investigations; school safety; youth, recreation, senior programs; storm drains/pollution prevention; retain/recruit experienced police officers; protect and maintain open space/parks; address homelessness; other essential City services; shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a local, half-cent sales tax for 15 years, providing $3,200,000 annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, all funds spent only in Martinez?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12320, "no_votes": 4590, "total_votes": 16910, "percent_yes": 72.85629804849202, "percent_no": 27.14370195150798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.5% local sales tax in Martinez for 15 years to fund police services, parks and recreation programs, infrastructure maintenance, and other city services, generating approximately $3.2 million annually. The measure included provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits, with all funds required to be spent within Martinez city limits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.010977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.497735", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain 911 police emergency response times; violent crime prevention/property investigations; school safety; youth, recreation, senior programs; storm drains/pollution prevention; retain/recruit experienced police officers; protect and maintain open space/parks; address homelessness; other essential City services; shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a local, half-cent sales tax for 15 years, providing $3,200,000 annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, all funds spent only in Martinez?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3543, "fingerprint": "2018|201800009|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800009|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "8af87817904a0deb", "measure_id": "201800009", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No.2017-003 be enacted? (The Ordinance limits the number of terms a person may serve on the Board of Supervisors to three total terms. It would be of no consequence whether the terms are consecutive or not. A partial term in excess of two years shall be deemed equal to one full term. Term limits shall only apply to new supervisors who commence a term of office after January 1, 2019.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1038, "no_votes": 668, "total_votes": 1706, "percent_yes": 60.844079718640096, "percent_no": 39.155920281359904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance limits Del Norte County Board of Supervisors members to three t...", "summary_text": "The ordinance limits Del Norte County Board of Supervisors members to three total terms, whether consecutive or not, with partial terms exceeding two years counting as full terms. The term limits apply only to supervisors who begin serving after January 1, 2019.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.013628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.503671", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No.2017-003 be enacted? (The Ordinance limits the number of terms a person may serve on the Board of Supervisors to three total terms. It would be of no consequence whether the terms are consecutive or not. A partial term in excess of two years shall be deemed equal to one full term. Term limits shall only apply to new supervisors who commence a term of office after January 1, 2019.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3544, "fingerprint": "2018|201800010|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800010|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "5ac534077d1f0e0e", "measure_id": "201800010", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Del Norte County establish taxes upon commercial cannabis activity in the following amounts: 2-6 percent of the gross receipts of a non-medicinal cannabis retailer, 1-3 percent of the gross receipts of a cannabis manufacturer, $1 per square foot of outdoor cultivation area and $3 per square of indoor cultivation area? Within the specified ranges, the Board of Supervisors shall set the spectic rate by resolution. AlI taxes imposed by this ordinance are general taxes, which may be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5014, "no_votes": 2915, "total_votes": 7929, "percent_yes": 63.23622146550637, "percent_no": 36.76377853449363, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established taxes on commercial cannabis businesses in Del Norte...", "summary_text": "This measure established taxes on commercial cannabis businesses in Del Norte County, including 2-6% of gross receipts for non-medical retailers, 1-3% for manufacturers, and $1-3 per square foot for outdoor and indoor cultivation respectively. The Board of Supervisors would set the specific rates within these ranges, with all revenue going to the county's general fund for unrestricted use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.013889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.503853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Del Norte County establish taxes upon commercial cannabis activity in the following amounts: 2-6 percent of the gross receipts of a non-medicinal cannabis retailer, 1-3 percent of the gross receipts of a cannabis manufacturer, $1 per square foot of outdoor cultivation area and $3 per square of indoor cultivation area? Within the specified ranges, the Board of Supervisors shall set the spectic rate by resolution. AlI taxes imposed by this ordinance are general taxes, which may be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3545, "fingerprint": "2018|201800146|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800146|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "240040f8087c3189", "measure_id": "201800146", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) An Initiative Measure to increase the County's Transient Occupancy Tax to Raise Funds for the Harbor for Specified Purposes", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4365, "no_votes": 3624, "total_votes": 7989, "percent_yes": 54.637626736763046, "percent_no": 45.362373263236954, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Del Norte County's transient occupancy tax to generate...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Del Norte County's transient occupancy tax to generate revenue specifically designated for harbor-related purposes. The tax applies to short-term lodging accommodations such as hotels and vacation rentals.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.014150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.504034", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) An Initiative Measure to increase the County's Transient Occupancy Tax to Raise Funds for the Harbor for Specified Purposes", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3548, "fingerprint": "2018|201800013|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800013|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a00710c020eedf83", "measure_id": "201800013", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To fund emergency medical and fire protection services, shall the measure renewing the existing Fire Special Tax, voter-approved on July 27, 2014, and set annually by the CSD Board, not to exceed $660.00 per unit, subject to maximum inflation adjustment of 1.5% per year, established as: Unimproved 0.5 unit (currently$306.48); improved 1.0 unit (currently $612.98); SSA Sierra Programs LLC (40 units, annual revenue raised of $196, 459.94, for the next four years be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 33, "percent_yes": 72.72727272727273, "percent_no": 27.272727272727266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed an existing special tax for fire and emergency medical s...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed an existing special tax for fire and emergency medical services in El Dorado, California, with rates not exceeding $660 per unit annually and allowing inflation adjustments up to 1.5% per year. The tax applies different rates based on property type, with unimproved parcels paying 0.5 units and improved parcels paying 1.0 unit.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.015008", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.504587", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund emergency medical and fire protection services, shall the measure renewing the existing Fire Special Tax, voter-approved on July 27, 2014, and set annually by the CSD Board, not to exceed $660.00 per unit, subject to maximum inflation adjustment of 1.5% per year, established as: Unimproved 0.5 unit (currently$306.48); improved 1.0 unit (currently $612.98); SSA Sierra Programs LLC (40 units, annual revenue raised of $196, 459.94, for the next four years be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3546, "fingerprint": "2018|201800011|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800011|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "1aca40e180ef3b7e", "measure_id": "201800011", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax in the an amount of $450.00 on each parcel of real property be levied within Pineoakio Road Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2018/2019 to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services, to replace the current benefit assessment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28, "no_votes": 7, "total_votes": 35, "percent_yes": 80.0, "percent_no": 20.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure levies an annual special tax of $450 per parcel of real property ...", "summary_text": "The measure levies an annual special tax of $450 per parcel of real property within the Pineoakio Road Zone of Benefit to fund road improvement and maintenance services. This tax replaces the existing benefit assessment starting in fiscal year 2018/2019.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-03-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.014410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.504215", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax in the an amount of $450.00 on each parcel of real property be levied within Pineoakio Road Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2018/2019 to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services, to replace the current benefit assessment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3547, "fingerprint": "2018|201800012|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800012|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "311e06cd16f988a8", "measure_id": "201800012", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax in an amount of $200.00 on each parcel of real property be levied within Pilot View Drive Road Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2018/2018, with annual adjustments thereafter tied to the California Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services, to replace the current benefit assessment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42, "no_votes": 11, "total_votes": 53, "percent_yes": 79.24528301886792, "percent_no": 20.754716981132077, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a $200 annual special tax on each parcel of real propert...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a $200 annual special tax on each parcel of real property within the Pilot View Drive Road Zone of Benefit, with annual adjustments based on the California Consumer Price Index, to fund road improvement and maintenance services. The tax replaced an existing benefit assessment.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-03-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.014673", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.504405", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax in an amount of $200.00 on each parcel of real property be levied within Pilot View Drive Road Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2018/2018, with annual adjustments thereafter tied to the California Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services, to replace the current benefit assessment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3562, "fingerprint": "2018|201800514|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800514|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "86bba9bd507fafdb", "measure_id": "201800514", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To bring older buildings to code/standards for continued use, improve workforce job training facilities to affordably prepare, train/retrain students/veterans for quality jobs, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, equipment, shall the measure for Sierra Joint Community College District to issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates and levy on average 1.7 cents/$100 assessed value ($18,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with taxpayer oversight/audits, no money for administrator salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1127, "no_votes": 1034, "total_votes": 2161, "percent_yes": 52.15178158260064, "percent_no": 47.84821841739936, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Sierra Joint Community College Distric...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Sierra Joint Community College District to issue $350 million in bonds to upgrade older buildings, improve job training facilities, and repair or construct classrooms and equipment, funded by a property tax levy averaging 1.7 cents per $100 of assessed value. The measure failed despite receiving 52.2% yes votes, indicating it required a supermajority to pass.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.018902", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.507207", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To bring older buildings to code/standards for continued use, improve workforce job training facilities to affordably prepare, train/retrain students/veterans for quality jobs, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, equipment, shall the measure for Sierra Joint Community College District to issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates and levy on average 1.7 cents/$100 assessed value ($18,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with taxpayer oversight/audits, no money for administrator salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3549, "fingerprint": "2018|201800014|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800014|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ccb697cedb090e5c", "measure_id": "201800014", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure to rescind Resolution 88-01 approved by the board of directors on October 26, 1988 and Resolution 2004-01 approved by the board of directors on Jan 20, 2014, which currently levy $75 each per parcel annually, consolidate the two $75 taxes and increase by $150 to thereby levy a new total of $300 per parcel per year until rescinded totaling $18,600 annually be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 85, "percent_yes": 85.88235294117646, "percent_no": 14.117647058823536, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would rescind two existing $75 annual parcel taxes and replace t...", "summary_text": "This measure would rescind two existing $75 annual parcel taxes and replace them with a single $300 annual parcel tax, resulting in a net increase of $150 per parcel per year. The new tax would generate approximately $18,600 annually in total revenue.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.015276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.504770", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to rescind Resolution 88-01 approved by the board of directors on October 26, 1988 and Resolution 2004-01 approved by the board of directors on Jan 20, 2014, which currently levy $75 each per parcel annually, consolidate the two $75 taxes and increase by $150 to thereby levy a new total of $300 per parcel per year until rescinded totaling $18,600 annually be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3550, "fingerprint": "2018|201800015|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800015|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "e2817fcff1e451dd", "measure_id": "201800015", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Measure be adopted to allow the Cameron Estates CSD to levy an increase of $345 to the special tax, over and above the current special tax rate of $250 per parcel per year, for a total tax rate not to exceed $595 per parcel per year to remain in effect until modified or repealed.  If approved, $173,740 will be raised annually for the purpose of crucial road revitalization and improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 362, "no_votes": 117, "total_votes": 479, "percent_yes": 75.5741127348643, "percent_no": 24.4258872651357, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Cameron Estates Community Services District to in...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Cameron Estates Community Services District to increase its special tax from $250 to $595 per parcel per year to fund road revitalization and improvements. The increase would raise approximately $173,740 annually and remain in effect until modified or repealed.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.015538", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.504952", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Measure be adopted to allow the Cameron Estates CSD to levy an increase of $345 to the special tax, over and above the current special tax rate of $250 per parcel per year, for a total tax rate not to exceed $595 per parcel per year to remain in effect until modified or repealed.  If approved, $173,740 will be raised annually for the purpose of crucial road revitalization and improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3551, "fingerprint": "2018|201800016|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800016|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "f44f6775f2c8da6c", "measure_id": "201800016", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure changing the El Dorado County Ordinance Code which imposes a tax on short term occupants of hotels, motels, vacation home rentals and similar facilities in the unincorporated areas of El Dorado County, effective until amended or repealed, to raise the amount collected from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) of the rent charged to the visitor with an estimated annual revenue of $750,000 that may be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36869, "no_votes": 47140, "total_votes": 84009, "percent_yes": 43.88696449189967, "percent_no": 56.11303550810033, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased El Dorado County's transient occupancy tax ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased El Dorado County's transient occupancy tax from 10% to 12% on short-term rentals including hotels, motels, and vacation rentals in unincorporated areas. The tax increase was expected to generate approximately $750,000 annually in unrestricted general revenue for the county.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.015800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.505140", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure changing the El Dorado County Ordinance Code which imposes a tax on short term occupants of hotels, motels, vacation home rentals and similar facilities in the unincorporated areas of El Dorado County, effective until amended or repealed, to raise the amount collected from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) of the rent charged to the visitor with an estimated annual revenue of $750,000 that may be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3559, "fingerprint": "2018|201800024|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800024|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "c56de9453728c918", "measure_id": "201800024", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an amendment to the bylaws of the Hickok Road Community Services District to increase the maximum annual Special Tax by $200 per parcel per year, such that the total Special Tax could increase from $200 to $400 per parcel per year, be adopted? The maximum resulting gain could increase from $12,400 to $24,800 per year. The increase would be in effect until amended or the board deems additional funds are no longer required to maintain, upgrade, or improve District roads.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 70, "percent_yes": 61.42857142857143, "percent_no": 38.57142857142857, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have doubled the maximum annual special tax for the Hickok...", "summary_text": "This measure would have doubled the maximum annual special tax for the Hickok Road Community Services District from $200 to $400 per parcel to fund road maintenance, upgrades, and improvements. The tax increase would have remained in effect until amended by the board or until additional funds were deemed no longer necessary.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.018040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.506638", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an amendment to the bylaws of the Hickok Road Community Services District to increase the maximum annual Special Tax by $200 per parcel per year, such that the total Special Tax could increase from $200 to $400 per parcel per year, be adopted? The maximum resulting gain could increase from $12,400 to $24,800 per year. The increase would be in effect until amended or the board deems additional funds are no longer required to maintain, upgrade, or improve District roads.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3560, "fingerprint": "2018|201800147|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800147|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "269db8f18d6acdc1", "measure_id": "201800147", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure establishing a cannabis (marijuana) businesses tax at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 8% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses;  which is expected to generate an estimated $50,000 to $70,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council in order to fund general municipal expenses, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2641, "no_votes": 1274, "total_votes": 3915, "percent_yes": 67.45849297573436, "percent_no": 32.54150702426564, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a cannabis business tax in El Dorado with rates up t...", "summary_text": "This measure established a cannabis business tax in El Dorado with rates up to $10 per square foot for cultivation, 8% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis businesses to fund general municipal expenses. The tax was expected to generate $50,000 to $70,000 annually and would remain in effect until repealed by voters or the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.018301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.506828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure establishing a cannabis (marijuana) businesses tax at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 8% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses;  which is expected to generate an estimated $50,000 to $70,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council in order to fund general municipal expenses, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3552, "fingerprint": "2018|201800017|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800017|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "75d614f90ef3ec10", "measure_id": "201800017", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide revenue for general government services, such as law enforcement and public health education, shall the measure regulating and imposing a general tax on any independently authorized commercial cannabis activity in the unincorporated areas of El Dorado County at rates up to: $30 per square foot or 15% for cultivation; 10% for distribution, manufacturing, and retail; and 5% for testing laboratories, effective until amended or repealed, with estimated annual revenue of $1,900,000 to $52,800,000, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53937, "no_votes": 29491, "total_votes": 83428, "percent_yes": 64.65095651340079, "percent_no": 35.349043486599214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a general tax on commercial cannabis activities in uninc...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a general tax on commercial cannabis activities in unincorporated areas of El Dorado County, with rates up to $30 per square foot or 15% for cultivation, 10% for distribution/manufacturing/retail, and 5% for testing laboratories. The tax was estimated to generate between $1.9 million and $52.8 million annually for general government services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.016137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.505325", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide revenue for general government services, such as law enforcement and public health education, shall the measure regulating and imposing a general tax on any independently authorized commercial cannabis activity in the unincorporated areas of El Dorado County at rates up to: $30 per square foot or 15% for cultivation; 10% for distribution, manufacturing, and retail; and 5% for testing laboratories, effective until amended or repealed, with estimated annual revenue of $1,900,000 to $52,800,000, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3553, "fingerprint": "2018|201800018|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800018|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ab0b1293ef6afc83", "measure_id": "201800018", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure allowing for outdoor and mixed-light (greenhouse) commercial cannabis cultivation for medicinal use on parcels of at least 10 acres zoned Rural Lands, Planned Agricultural, Limited Agricultural, and Agricultural Grazing that are restricted in canopy size, required to pay a County commercial cannabis tax, and subject to a site-specific review and discretionary permitting process with notification to surrounding property owners and environmental regulation be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50475, "no_votes": 32896, "total_votes": 83371, "percent_yes": 60.54263472910244, "percent_no": 39.45736527089756, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows outdoor and greenhouse commercial cannabis cultivation fo...", "summary_text": "This measure allows outdoor and greenhouse commercial cannabis cultivation for medicinal use on parcels of at least 10 acres in specified rural and agricultural zones, subject to canopy size restrictions, county taxes, and a discretionary permitting process with neighbor notification and environmental oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.016401", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.505510", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure allowing for outdoor and mixed-light (greenhouse) commercial cannabis cultivation for medicinal use on parcels of at least 10 acres zoned Rural Lands, Planned Agricultural, Limited Agricultural, and Agricultural Grazing that are restricted in canopy size, required to pay a County commercial cannabis tax, and subject to a site-specific review and discretionary permitting process with notification to surrounding property owners and environmental regulation be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3554, "fingerprint": "2018|201800019|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800019|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "5e82471063eee84d", "measure_id": "201800019", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure allowing for outdoor and mixed-light (greenhouse) commercial cannabis cultivation for recreational adult use on parcels of at least 10 acres zoned Rural Lands, Planned Agricultural, Limited Agricultural, and Agricultural Grazing that are restricted in canopy size, required to pay a County commercial cannabis tax, and subject to a site-specific review and discretionary permitting process with notification to surrounding property owners and environmental regulation be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49234, "no_votes": 33881, "total_votes": 83115, "percent_yes": 59.23599831558683, "percent_no": 40.76400168441317, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows outdoor and greenhouse commercial cannabis cultivation fo...", "summary_text": "This measure allows outdoor and greenhouse commercial cannabis cultivation for recreational use on parcels of at least 10 acres in specific agricultural and rural zones, subject to canopy size restrictions, county taxes, discretionary permitting, and environmental regulations. The cultivation operations must undergo site-specific review with notification to neighboring property owners.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.016663", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.505693", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure allowing for outdoor and mixed-light (greenhouse) commercial cannabis cultivation for recreational adult use on parcels of at least 10 acres zoned Rural Lands, Planned Agricultural, Limited Agricultural, and Agricultural Grazing that are restricted in canopy size, required to pay a County commercial cannabis tax, and subject to a site-specific review and discretionary permitting process with notification to surrounding property owners and environmental regulation be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3555, "fingerprint": "2018|201800020|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800020|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "7f7cadaed1db5783", "measure_id": "201800020", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure allowing for the retail sale, delivery, distribution, and indoor cultivation of commercial cannabis for medicinal use on parcels zoned Community Commercial, Regional Commercial, General Commercial, Industrial High, and Industrial Low that are restricted in number and concentration, required to pay a County commercial cannabis tax, and subject to a site-specific review and discretionary permitting process with notification to surrounding property owners and environmental regulation be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50587, "no_votes": 32078, "total_votes": 82665, "percent_yes": 61.19518538680215, "percent_no": 38.80481461319785, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure allows retail sale, delivery, distribution, and indoor cultivatio...", "summary_text": "The measure allows retail sale, delivery, distribution, and indoor cultivation of commercial medical cannabis on specific commercial and industrial zoned parcels, subject to limits on number and concentration, county taxation, and a discretionary permitting process with environmental regulations and neighbor notification. The measure passed with 61.2% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.016924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.505880", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure allowing for the retail sale, delivery, distribution, and indoor cultivation of commercial cannabis for medicinal use on parcels zoned Community Commercial, Regional Commercial, General Commercial, Industrial High, and Industrial Low that are restricted in number and concentration, required to pay a County commercial cannabis tax, and subject to a site-specific review and discretionary permitting process with notification to surrounding property owners and environmental regulation be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3556, "fingerprint": "2018|201800021|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800021|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "5c73d95ecc385a10", "measure_id": "201800021", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure allowing for the retail sale, delivery, distribution, and indoor cultivation of commercial cannabis for recreational adult use on parcels zoned Community Commercial, Regional Commercial, General Commercial, Industrial High, and Industrial Low that are restricted in number and concentration, required to pay a County commercial cannabis tax, and subject to a site-specific review and discretionary permitting process with notification to surrounding property owners and environmental regulation be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49226, "no_votes": 32786, "total_votes": 82012, "percent_yes": 60.02292347461348, "percent_no": 39.97707652538652, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the retail sale, delivery, distribution, and indoor c...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the retail sale, delivery, distribution, and indoor cultivation of commercial recreational cannabis on specific commercially and industrially zoned parcels in El Dorado County, subject to limits on number and concentration, county taxation, and a discretionary permitting process with property owner notification requirements. The measure passed with 60% voter approval in 2018.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.017187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.506063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure allowing for the retail sale, delivery, distribution, and indoor cultivation of commercial cannabis for recreational adult use on parcels zoned Community Commercial, Regional Commercial, General Commercial, Industrial High, and Industrial Low that are restricted in number and concentration, required to pay a County commercial cannabis tax, and subject to a site-specific review and discretionary permitting process with notification to surrounding property owners and environmental regulation be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3561, "fingerprint": "2018|201800148|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800148|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "b07a79b29b4b58b3", "measure_id": "201800148", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should an ordinance, to eliminate most vacation home rentals (\u201cVHR\u201d) in residential zones within the City of South Lake Tahoe, be adopted, that: (1) eliminates VHRs in residential zones by 2021, except for certain \u201cqualified\u201d VHRs operated by permanent residents; (2) allows VHR operations in commercial zones and tourist core areas; (3) adds VHR occupancy limitations; (4) increases minimum fines for VHR-related violations, after 2021; and (5) limits the ordinance\u2019s amendment, unless approved by a majority of voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3517, "no_votes": 3459, "total_votes": 6976, "percent_yes": 50.41571100917432, "percent_no": 49.58428899082568, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance eliminates most vacation home rentals in residential zones with...", "summary_text": "The ordinance eliminates most vacation home rentals in residential zones within South Lake Tahoe by 2021, with exceptions for qualified rentals operated by permanent residents, while allowing such rentals in commercial and tourist areas. It also establishes occupancy limits, increases violation fines, and requires voter approval for future amendments to the ordinance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.018578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.507012", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should an ordinance, to eliminate most vacation home rentals (\u201cVHR\u201d) in residential zones within the City of South Lake Tahoe, be adopted, that: (1) eliminates VHRs in residential zones by 2021, except for certain \u201cqualified\u201d VHRs operated by permanent residents; (2) allows VHR operations in commercial zones and tourist core areas; (3) adds VHR occupancy limitations; (4) increases minimum fines for VHR-related violations, after 2021; and (5) limits the ordinance\u2019s amendment, unless approved by a majority of voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3557, "fingerprint": "2018|201800022|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800022|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "241600f74013082e", "measure_id": "201800022", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure be adopted to amend the El Dorado County Charter Section 202 regarding Term Limits for Board of Supervisors to provide that one additional four year term of office be added to extend allowed terms to three, such that Board members shall be limited to three consecutive terms, with no other changes to this Charter Section?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19079, "no_votes": 62438, "total_votes": 81517, "percent_yes": 23.40493394015972, "percent_no": 76.59506605984028, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the El Dorado County Charter to extend term l...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the El Dorado County Charter to extend term limits for Board of Supervisors from two consecutive four-year terms to three consecutive four-year terms.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.017506", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.506254", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure be adopted to amend the El Dorado County Charter Section 202 regarding Term Limits for Board of Supervisors to provide that one additional four year term of office be added to extend allowed terms to three, such that Board members shall be limited to three consecutive terms, with no other changes to this Charter Section?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3558, "fingerprint": "2018|201800023|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800023|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "5baac3939036e8b4", "measure_id": "201800023", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure be adopted to amend the El Dorado County Charter Section 502.1 regarding Classified and Unclassified Employees to provide that the Board of Supervisors may determine, by Resolution, additional positions to be of the \u201cunclassified service,\u201d such that the Board may designate that certain County employment positions will no longer be afforded civil services status and protection and shall serve in an \u201cat-will\u201d capacity?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31946, "no_votes": 45115, "total_votes": 77061, "percent_yes": 41.45547034167737, "percent_no": 58.54452965832263, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the El Dorado County Charter to allow the Boa...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the El Dorado County Charter to allow the Board of Supervisors to designate certain county employee positions as \"unclassified service,\" removing their civil service protections and making them at-will employees. The amendment failed with 41.5% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.017776", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.506441", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure be adopted to amend the El Dorado County Charter Section 502.1 regarding Classified and Unclassified Employees to provide that the Board of Supervisors may determine, by Resolution, additional positions to be of the \u201cunclassified service,\u201d such that the Board may designate that certain County employment positions will no longer be afforded civil services status and protection and shall serve in an \u201cat-will\u201d capacity?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11176, "fingerprint": "2018|201800154|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800154|FRESNO", "content_hash": "569cfbb3b5bbf821", "measure_id": "201800154", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund unrestricted general revenue purposes, including combating gangs, drug abuse, human trafficking and homelessness, fund police, fire, roads, and parks (90%) and fund a Community Benefit Fund allocated as recommended by a citizens' commission (10%), shall the measure to tax cannabis cultivation up to $12 per canopy square-foot and up to 10% of gross receipts for medical dispensaries and all other cannabis businesses, generating up to $10 million annually until repealed, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83954, "no_votes": 34366, "total_votes": 118320, "percent_yes": 70.95503718728871, "percent_no": 29.04496281271129, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure imposes taxes on cannabis cultivation up to $12 per canopy square...", "summary_text": "The measure imposes taxes on cannabis cultivation up to $12 per canopy square-foot and up to 10% of gross receipts for dispensaries and other cannabis businesses, generating up to $10 million annually. Ninety percent of the revenue would fund general city services including police, fire, roads, and parks, while 10% would go to a Community Benefit Fund allocated by a citizens' commission.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.528487", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.021300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.508496", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund unrestricted general revenue purposes, including combating gangs, drug abuse, human trafficking and homelessness, fund police, fire, roads, and parks (90%) and fund a Community Benefit Fund allocated as recommended by a citizens' commission (10%), shall the measure to tax cannabis cultivation up to $12 per canopy square-foot and up to 10% of gross receipts for medical dispensaries and all other cannabis businesses, generating up to $10 million annually until repealed, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3563, "fingerprint": "2018|201800025|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800025|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d826f56f24aa4631", "measure_id": "201800025", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Fresno County Charter be amended as follows: Amending section 16 to remove the Director of Public Works as county surveyor and authorizing the Director of Public Works to appoint a county surveyor.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 69137, "no_votes": 47070, "total_votes": 116207, "percent_yes": 59.49469481184438, "percent_no": 40.50530518815562, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Fresno County Charter to remove the automatic design...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Fresno County Charter to remove the automatic designation of the Director of Public Works as county surveyor and instead allow the Director of Public Works to appoint someone to serve as county surveyor.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.019167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.507394", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Fresno County Charter be amended as follows: Amending section 16 to remove the Director of Public Works as county surveyor and authorizing the Director of Public Works to appoint a county surveyor.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11180, "fingerprint": "2018|201800519|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800519|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a34b5e090ca55bb7", "measure_id": "201800519", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue improving college/career preparation and reduce overcrowding by constructing the Sanger Unified School District Educational Complex including vocational/career education classrooms/labs; wiring/technology infrastructure, computer, engineering, science labs; emergency communication systems, security door locks, cameras; up-to-date classrooms; shall Sanger Unified School District issue $70,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levy on average 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising $4,900,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity, requiring audits, oversight, all money used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9959, "no_votes": 4798, "total_votes": 14757, "percent_yes": 67.4866165209731, "percent_no": 32.5133834790269, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Sanger Unified School District to issue $70 million i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Sanger Unified School District to issue $70 million in bonds to construct an educational complex with vocational classrooms, science labs, technology infrastructure, and security systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy averaging 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $4.9 million annually until maturity.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.530761", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.024798", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.510712", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue improving college/career preparation and reduce overcrowding by constructing the Sanger Unified School District Educational Complex including vocational/career education classrooms/labs; wiring/technology infrastructure, computer, engineering, science labs; emergency communication systems, security door locks, cameras; up-to-date classrooms; shall Sanger Unified School District issue $70,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levy on average 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising $4,900,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity, requiring audits, oversight, all money used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3575, "fingerprint": "2018|201800515|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800515|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3d80f79b3ed3274f", "measure_id": "201800515", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve P.E. fields and facilities; shall Laton Joint Unified School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $421,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 213, "no_votes": 160, "total_votes": 373, "percent_yes": 57.10455764075068, "percent_no": 42.89544235924932, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Laton Joint Unified School District to issue $7 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Laton Joint Unified School District to issue $7 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and restroom modernization, health and safety upgrades, and physical education facility improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value and include oversight provisions prohibiting use of funds for salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.023606", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.509975", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve P.E. fields and facilities; shall Laton Joint Unified School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $421,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11177, "fingerprint": "2018|201800159|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800159|FRESNO", "content_hash": "7cbe4a1638adb75f", "measure_id": "201800159", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide additional funding for city services, including, but not limited to, parks, roads, recreational opportunities, and public safety, shall the ordinance increasing the City's Sales and Use Tax from .980% to 1.980%, which will raise approximately $500,000 annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 634, "no_votes": 444, "total_votes": 1078, "percent_yes": 58.8126159554731, "percent_no": 41.1873840445269, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Fresno's sales and use tax from 0", "summary_text": "This measure increased Fresno's sales and use tax from 0.980% to 1.980% to generate approximately $500,000 annually for city services including parks, roads, recreation, and public safety. The measure passed with 58.8% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.529427", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.022719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.509428", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide additional funding for city services, including, but not limited to, parks, roads, recreational opportunities, and public safety, shall the ordinance increasing the City's Sales and Use Tax from .980% to 1.980%, which will raise approximately $500,000 annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3566, "fingerprint": "2018|201800151|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800151|FRESNO", "content_hash": "09b5cd485305800c", "measure_id": "201800151", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure the availability of and to maintain and enhance essential City services, such as fire protection services among others, shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a four percent (4%) utility users tax indefinitely on electric, natural gas and telecommunications services to raise approximately $398,000.00 annually, and which includes procedures for fair and broad-based application?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 276, "no_votes": 362, "total_votes": 638, "percent_yes": 43.26018808777429, "percent_no": 56.73981191222571, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted a 4% utility users tax on electric, natural ga...", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted a 4% utility users tax on electric, natural gas, and telecommunications services to generate approximately $398,000 annually for city services including fire protection. The tax would have been applied indefinitely with no specified end date.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.020346", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.507945", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure the availability of and to maintain and enhance essential City services, such as fire protection services among others, shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a four percent (4%) utility users tax indefinitely on electric, natural gas and telecommunications services to raise approximately $398,000.00 annually, and which includes procedures for fair and broad-based application?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11178, "fingerprint": "2018|201800516|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800516|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a24ff412dad289f6", "measure_id": "201800516", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Monroe Elementary School District issue $1,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $69,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 164, "no_votes": 53, "total_votes": 217, "percent_yes": 75.57603686635944, "percent_no": 24.423963133640555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Monroe Elementary School District to issue $1,000...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Monroe Elementary School District to issue $1,000,000 in general obligation bonds to repair roofs and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed value and include oversight requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.530196", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.023873", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.510158", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Monroe Elementary School District issue $1,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $69,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3565, "fingerprint": "2018|201800150|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800150|FRESNO", "content_hash": "6f0324650d8aa3d5", "measure_id": "201800150", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure D passes, should the revenues raised be primarily used to provide, maintain and enhance fire services in the City of Parlier?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 430, "no_votes": 190, "total_votes": 620, "percent_yes": 69.35483870967742, "percent_no": 30.645161290322577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked Fresno voters whether revenues from Measure D sho...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked Fresno voters whether revenues from Measure D should primarily fund fire services in the City of Parlier, including providing, maintaining, and enhancing those services. The measure passed with 69.4% support but was non-binding as an advisory vote.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.020001", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.507759", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure D passes, should the revenues raised be primarily used to provide, maintain and enhance fire services in the City of Parlier?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11179, "fingerprint": "2018|201800518|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800518|FRESNO", "content_hash": "40ac6ec1310262ec", "measure_id": "201800518", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize media center to support 21st century learning; renovate/replace outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Pine Ridge Elementary School District issue $5,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $354,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 304, "no_votes": 226, "total_votes": 530, "percent_yes": 57.35849056603774, "percent_no": 42.64150943396226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Pine Ridge Elementary School District to issue $5,300...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Pine Ridge Elementary School District to issue $5,300,000 in bonds to modernize the media center, renovate classrooms and restrooms, replace outdated facilities, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $354,000 annually until paid off.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.530573", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.024498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.510528", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize media center to support 21st century learning; renovate/replace outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Pine Ridge Elementary School District issue $5,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $354,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3564, "fingerprint": "2018|201800149|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800149|FRESNO", "content_hash": "74c3d617520aaa0d", "measure_id": "201800149", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To generate approximately $940,000 annually for ten years to hire additional police officers to increase crime suppression and prevention; bolster firefighter and paramedic staffing levels and 911 emergency services; and restore and replace out-of-date equipment, shall the City of Kingsburg enact a 1 cent sales tax, requiring a citizens' oversight committee and annual reporting of expenses, with all funds generated staying in the City of Kingsburg?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1635, "no_votes": 658, "total_votes": 2293, "percent_yes": 71.30396860008722, "percent_no": 28.696031399912783, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacted a 1 cent sales tax in Kingsburg for ten years to generate...", "summary_text": "The measure enacted a 1 cent sales tax in Kingsburg for ten years to generate approximately $940,000 annually for additional police officers, firefighter and paramedic staffing, 911 emergency services, and equipment replacement. The measure requires a citizens' oversight committee and annual expense reporting, with all funds remaining within the city.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.019464", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.507576", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To generate approximately $940,000 annually for ten years to hire additional police officers to increase crime suppression and prevention; bolster firefighter and paramedic staffing levels and 911 emergency services; and restore and replace out-of-date equipment, shall the City of Kingsburg enact a 1 cent sales tax, requiring a citizens' oversight committee and annual reporting of expenses, with all funds generated staying in the City of Kingsburg?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3577, "fingerprint": "2018|201800520|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800520|FRESNO", "content_hash": "47d0e32771449e9d", "measure_id": "201800520", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Westside Elementary School District issue $3,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $208,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 62, "percent_yes": 90.32258064516128, "percent_no": 9.677419354838719, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Westside Elementary School District to issue $3", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Westside Elementary School District to issue $3.5 million in bonds to repair roofs, modernize classrooms and facilities, and make health, safety and accessibility improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.025228", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.510896", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Westside Elementary School District issue $3,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $208,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3576, "fingerprint": "2018|201800517|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800517|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a0cf4679ddd0346a", "measure_id": "201800517", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health and safety improvements; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Parlier Unified School District issue $9,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $535,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1417, "no_votes": 754, "total_votes": 2171, "percent_yes": 65.26946107784431, "percent_no": 34.73053892215569, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Parlier Unified School District to issue $9 million i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Parlier Unified School District to issue $9 million in bonds to repair roofs, make health and safety improvements, and modernize classrooms, restrooms and other school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, with oversight by an independent citizens' committee and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.024173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.510344", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health and safety improvements; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Parlier Unified School District issue $9,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $535,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3567, "fingerprint": "2018|201800152|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800152|FRESNO", "content_hash": "0b83a9dc4470db22", "measure_id": "201800152", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help prevent the loss of vital public safety services, and to protect other general services, shall the City of Coalinga enact a general-purpose, one-percent sales tax, expected to generate $850,000 annually, with annual independent audits with an expiration (sunset) in ten (10) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1728, "no_votes": 1240, "total_votes": 2968, "percent_yes": 58.22102425876011, "percent_no": 41.77897574123989, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacted a 1% general-purpose sales tax in Coalinga expected to ge...", "summary_text": "The measure enacted a 1% general-purpose sales tax in Coalinga expected to generate $850,000 annually for public safety and other general city services. The tax includes annual independent audits and automatically expires after 10 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.020639", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.508127", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help prevent the loss of vital public safety services, and to protect other general services, shall the City of Coalinga enact a general-purpose, one-percent sales tax, expected to generate $850,000 annually, with annual independent audits with an expiration (sunset) in ten (10) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3573, "fingerprint": "2018|201800160|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800160|FRESNO", "content_hash": "61b36e378480db69", "measure_id": "201800160", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) To ensure the availability of and to maintain and enhance essential City services, such as fire protection services among others, shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a four percent (4%) utility users tax indefinitely on electric, natural gas and telecommunications services to raise approximately $398,000.00 annually, and which includes procedures for fair and broad-based application?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1021, "no_votes": 954, "total_votes": 1975, "percent_yes": 51.696202531645575, "percent_no": 48.303797468354425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure proposed enacting a 4% utility users tax on electric, n...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure proposed enacting a 4% utility users tax on electric, natural gas, and telecommunications services to generate approximately $398,000 annually for city services including fire protection. The measure passed with 51.7% support, though as an advisory measure it was non-binding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.022996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.509612", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) To ensure the availability of and to maintain and enhance essential City services, such as fire protection services among others, shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a four percent (4%) utility users tax indefinitely on electric, natural gas and telecommunications services to raise approximately $398,000.00 annually, and which includes procedures for fair and broad-based application?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3574, "fingerprint": "2018|201800161|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800161|FRESNO", "content_hash": "7c8c7a933517f872", "measure_id": "201800161", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure K passes, should the revenues raised be primarily used to provide, maintain and enhance fire services in the City of Parlier?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1290, "no_votes": 600, "total_votes": 1890, "percent_yes": 68.25396825396825, "percent_no": 31.746031746031747, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked Fresno voters whether revenues from Measure K sho...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked Fresno voters whether revenues from Measure K should be primarily allocated to providing, maintaining, and enhancing fire services in the City of Parlier. The measure passed with 68.3% support, expressing voter preference for this use of funds though it carries no binding legal authority.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.023332", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.509793", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure K passes, should the revenues raised be primarily used to provide, maintain and enhance fire services in the City of Parlier?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3572, "fingerprint": "2018|201800158|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800158|FRESNO", "content_hash": "dfe8364c9a3b6e28", "measure_id": "201800158", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for essential city services and projects in the City of Kerman such as: police patrols, crime prevention, and quick 9-1-1 emergency response; repairing pothole and infrastructure, maintaining streets, revitalizing downtown area, and improving community facilities, parks, senior services, and other general city services, shall the measure establishing a one percent sales tax providing approximately $1,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2111, "no_votes": 774, "total_votes": 2885, "percent_yes": 73.17157712305026, "percent_no": 26.828422876949745, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 1% sales tax in Kerman, California to generate app...", "summary_text": "This measure established a 1% sales tax in Kerman, California to generate approximately $1 million annually for city services including police, emergency response, street repairs, downtown revitalization, parks, and other general municipal services. The measure included provisions for citizen oversight, independent audits, and local control of funds, and would remain in effect until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.022445", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.509244", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for essential city services and projects in the City of Kerman such as: police patrols, crime prevention, and quick 9-1-1 emergency response; repairing pothole and infrastructure, maintaining streets, revitalizing downtown area, and improving community facilities, parks, senior services, and other general city services, shall the measure establishing a one percent sales tax providing approximately $1,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3568, "fingerprint": "2018|201800153|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800153|FRESNO", "content_hash": "339cf41b5d852386", "measure_id": "201800153", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To generate approximately $953,000 annually to build a new police station and restore or replace out-of-date police equipment. Revenues will also be used to fix city streets needing repair and to pay escalating pension obligations and other general fund obligations, with the remainder going to a reserve account. Shall the City of Fowler enact a 1 cent sales tax, requiring an annual reporting of expenses, with all funds generating staying in the City of Fowler?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1028, "no_votes": 825, "total_votes": 1853, "percent_yes": 55.47760388559093, "percent_no": 44.52239611440907, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have enacted a 1-cent sales tax in Fowler, California to g...", "summary_text": "This measure would have enacted a 1-cent sales tax in Fowler, California to generate approximately $953,000 annually for building a new police station, replacing police equipment, fixing city streets, paying pension obligations, and creating a reserve fund. The measure required annual expense reporting and mandated that all revenues remain within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.020912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.508312", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To generate approximately $953,000 annually to build a new police station and restore or replace out-of-date police equipment. Revenues will also be used to fix city streets needing repair and to pay escalating pension obligations and other general fund obligations, with the remainder going to a reserve account. Shall the City of Fowler enact a 1 cent sales tax, requiring an annual reporting of expenses, with all funds generating staying in the City of Fowler?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3569, "fingerprint": "2018|201800155|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800155|FRESNO", "content_hash": "64a53aa0d2282c39", "measure_id": "201800155", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fresno Charter be amended to remove or modify these legally unenforceable sections? (1) \u00a7309, prohibiting \"off-year\" campaign contributions--removed as unconstitutional. (2) \u00a7701's City Manager residency requirement--removed as unconstitutional. (3) \u00a71225, prohibiting residential water meters--removed as preempted by state/federal law. (4) \u00a71207, requiring the City Council to raise taxes to balance the budget--amended and made subject to the Proposition 218 requirement for voter approval of taxes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56337, "no_votes": 55117, "total_votes": 111454, "percent_yes": 50.54731099825938, "percent_no": 49.45268900174062, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment removed three legally unenforceable sections from Fres...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment removed three legally unenforceable sections from Fresno's city charter (prohibitions on off-year campaign contributions, city manager residency requirements, and residential water meters) and modified a fourth section to make tax increases for budget balancing subject to voter approval under Proposition 218. The measure passed with 50.5% support, cleaning up outdated charter provisions that were deemed unconstitutional or preempted by state and federal law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.021633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.508682", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fresno Charter be amended to remove or modify these legally unenforceable sections? (1) \u00a7309, prohibiting \"off-year\" campaign contributions--removed as unconstitutional. (2) \u00a7701's City Manager residency requirement--removed as unconstitutional. (3) \u00a71225, prohibiting residential water meters--removed as preempted by state/federal law. (4) \u00a71207, requiring the City Council to raise taxes to balance the budget--amended and made subject to the Proposition 218 requirement for voter approval of taxes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3570, "fingerprint": "2018|201800156|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800156|FRESNO", "content_hash": "79030f1546cc837f", "measure_id": "201800156", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure imposing a 3/8 percent sales and use tax, estimated to generate $37.5 million annually for 30 years, funding City parks and cultural arts, with independent oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61870, "no_votes": 56723, "total_votes": 118593, "percent_yes": 52.17002689872084, "percent_no": 47.82997310127916, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a 3/8 percent sales and use tax in Fresno for...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a 3/8 percent sales and use tax in Fresno for 30 years to generate approximately $37.5 million annually for city parks and cultural arts programs, with independent oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.021908", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.508876", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure imposing a 3/8 percent sales and use tax, estimated to generate $37.5 million annually for 30 years, funding City parks and cultural arts, with independent oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3571, "fingerprint": "2018|201800157|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800157|FRESNO", "content_hash": "c1dffee58dc5c0b0", "measure_id": "201800157", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fresno Charter \u00a71205 be amended to require the City adopt a balanced budget each fiscal year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 90351, "no_votes": 21979, "total_votes": 112330, "percent_yes": 80.43354402207781, "percent_no": 19.56645597792219, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires the City of Fresno to adopt a balanced budget...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires the City of Fresno to adopt a balanced budget each fiscal year by amending Section 1205 of the city charter. The measure passed in 2018 with 80.4% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.022178", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.509058", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fresno Charter \u00a71205 be amended to require the City adopt a balanced budget each fiscal year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3578, "fingerprint": "2018|201800162|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800162|GLENN", "content_hash": "eec41907a8f830a8", "measure_id": "201800162", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Offices of the Orland City Clerk and the Orland City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 579, "no_votes": 465, "total_votes": 1044, "percent_yes": 55.45977011494253, "percent_no": 44.54022988505747, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would change the Orland City Clerk and City Treasurer positions ...", "summary_text": "This measure would change the Orland City Clerk and City Treasurer positions from elected offices to appointed positions. The measure passed, allowing the city council to appoint rather than voters to elect these officials.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.025506", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.511080", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Offices of the Orland City Clerk and the Orland City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3579, "fingerprint": "2018|201800163|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800163|GLENN", "content_hash": "2bd2544eb64dcad0", "measure_id": "201800163", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure D be adopted, replacing the current Orland Fire Protection District of Glenn County annual property tax of $20.00 with an annual property tax of: Residential - $30.00 Per Habitable Dwelling and $.25 Per Acre, and Commercial/Industrial - $100.00 Per Building Less Than 999 Square Feet and $200.00 Per Building Over 999 Square Feet and $.25 Per Acre, providing $236,000 local funds, annually, the duration of the tax continuous, until ended by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1059, "no_votes": 1062, "total_votes": 2121, "percent_yes": 49.92927864214992, "percent_no": 50.07072135785008, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have replaced the Orland Fire Protection District's flat $2...", "summary_text": "The measure would have replaced the Orland Fire Protection District's flat $20 annual property tax with a tiered system charging $30 per dwelling plus $0.25 per acre for residential properties, and $100-200 per building (based on size) plus $0.25 per acre for commercial/industrial properties. The new tax structure was designed to generate $236,000 annually and would have continued indefinitely until voters chose to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.025771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.511266", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure D be adopted, replacing the current Orland Fire Protection District of Glenn County annual property tax of $20.00 with an annual property tax of: Residential - $30.00 Per Habitable Dwelling and $.25 Per Acre, and Commercial/Industrial - $100.00 Per Building Less Than 999 Square Feet and $200.00 Per Building Over 999 Square Feet and $.25 Per Acre, providing $236,000 local funds, annually, the duration of the tax continuous, until ended by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3580, "fingerprint": "2018|201800164|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800164|GLENN", "content_hash": "31b58c39507484ac", "measure_id": "201800164", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure E be adopted to approve an increase in the City\u2019s Hotel Users Tax from the current rate of ten percent (10%) to a rate of twelve percent (12%), raising $30,000 annually, all funds staying local for the direct benefit of services for the citizens of the City of Orland, including law enforcement, emergency medical and fire, street repairs, and supporting Orland\u2019s tourism, the duration of the tax continuous, until repealed or amended?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1116, "no_votes": 728, "total_votes": 1844, "percent_yes": 60.52060737527116, "percent_no": 39.47939262472884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the hotel users tax (transient occupancy tax) in Orlan...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the hotel users tax (transient occupancy tax) in Orland, California from 10% to 12%, with an estimated annual revenue of $30,000. The funds are designated for local services including law enforcement, emergency medical and fire services, street repairs, and tourism support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.026130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.511455", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure E be adopted to approve an increase in the City\u2019s Hotel Users Tax from the current rate of ten percent (10%) to a rate of twelve percent (12%), raising $30,000 annually, all funds staying local for the direct benefit of services for the citizens of the City of Orland, including law enforcement, emergency medical and fire, street repairs, and supporting Orland\u2019s tourism, the duration of the tax continuous, until repealed or amended?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3581, "fingerprint": "2018|201800521|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800521|GLENN", "content_hash": "de26fc7d267bd1b7", "measure_id": "201800521", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire land and facilities for school and educational uses, improve/modernize classrooms and school facilities at Hamilton schools, make health and safety improvements, including new lighting and fire suppression systems, and upgrade/modernize Ag facilities, shall Hamilton Unified School District issue $7,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, levy $6 cents per $100 of assessed value for as long as bonds are outstanding ($407 thousand annually) with taxpayer oversight, audits, no administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 488, "no_votes": 325, "total_votes": 813, "percent_yes": 60.02460024600246, "percent_no": 39.97539975399754, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Hamilton Unified School District to issue $7 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Hamilton Unified School District to issue $7 million in bonds to acquire land, improve and modernize school facilities, make health and safety upgrades, and upgrade agricultural facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value for the duration of the bond repayment period.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.026400", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.511651", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire land and facilities for school and educational uses, improve/modernize classrooms and school facilities at Hamilton schools, make health and safety improvements, including new lighting and fire suppression systems, and upgrade/modernize Ag facilities, shall Hamilton Unified School District issue $7,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, levy $6 cents per $100 of assessed value for as long as bonds are outstanding ($407 thousand annually) with taxpayer oversight, audits, no administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3589, "fingerprint": "2018|201800523|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800523|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "d6145bfcddcd66ad", "measure_id": "201800523", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; and renovate/modernize outdated classrooms and school facilities; shall Freshwater School District issue $2,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $149,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 483, "no_votes": 263, "total_votes": 746, "percent_yes": 64.74530831099196, "percent_no": 35.25469168900804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Freshwater School District to issue $2", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Freshwater School District to issue $2.1 million in bonds to repair roofs and renovate classrooms and school facilities, funded through property tax levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed value. The bonds would be subject to annual audits and citizen oversight, with funds restricted to capital improvements rather than salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.028784", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.513147", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; and renovate/modernize outdated classrooms and school facilities; shall Freshwater School District issue $2,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $149,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3591, "fingerprint": "2018|201800525|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800525|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "76f72462a482d7a9", "measure_id": "201800525", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Rio Dell School District issue $1,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $111,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 389, "no_votes": 192, "total_votes": 581, "percent_yes": 66.95352839931154, "percent_no": 33.04647160068846, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Rio Dell School District to issue $1,600,000 in bo...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Rio Dell School District to issue $1,600,000 in bonds to repair roofs and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $111,000 annually until maturity.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.029326", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.513526", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Rio Dell School District issue $1,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $111,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3590, "fingerprint": "2018|201800524|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800524|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "3b588610930d4dc3", "measure_id": "201800524", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and technology and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Pacific Union School District issue $5,600,000 of bonds, at legal rates, raising approximately $319,000 annually through 2053 at a rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation and have independent citizens\u2019 oversight with NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 721, "no_votes": 368, "total_votes": 1089, "percent_yes": 66.20752984389348, "percent_no": 33.79247015610652, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Pacific Union School District to issue $5", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Pacific Union School District to issue $5.6 million in bonds to repair facilities, upgrade technology, and modernize classrooms and other school infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising approximately $319,000 annually through 2053.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.029055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.513338", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and technology and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Pacific Union School District issue $5,600,000 of bonds, at legal rates, raising approximately $319,000 annually through 2053 at a rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation and have independent citizens\u2019 oversight with NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3588, "fingerprint": "2018|201800522|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800522|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "be05a8a446bff23f", "measure_id": "201800522", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Fortuna Elementary School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $645,000 annually through approximately 2053 for issued bonds from levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 935, "no_votes": 750, "total_votes": 1685, "percent_yes": 55.48961424332344, "percent_no": 44.51038575667656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Fortuna Elementary School District to issue $10 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Fortuna Elementary School District to issue $10 million in bonds to repair roofs and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $645,000 annually through approximately 2053.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.028406", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.512958", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Fortuna Elementary School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $645,000 annually through approximately 2053 for issued bonds from levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3585, "fingerprint": "2018|201800166|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800166|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "92e94b6eae254e2b", "measure_id": "201800166", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Blue Lake adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 3 of the Municipal Code by imposing a ten percent (10%) general tax charged to hotel guests for the privilege of occupancy within the City? The tax imposed by this Ordinance is expected to generate $19,000 in annual revenue and will continue in effect until later repealed.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 395, "no_votes": 143, "total_votes": 538, "percent_yes": 73.42007434944237, "percent_no": 26.579925650557627, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure imposed a 10% transient occupancy tax on hotel guests in Blue Lak...", "summary_text": "The measure imposed a 10% transient occupancy tax on hotel guests in Blue Lake, with expected annual revenue of $19,000. The tax continues indefinitely until repealed by the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.027574", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.512400", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Blue Lake adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 3 of the Municipal Code by imposing a ten percent (10%) general tax charged to hotel guests for the privilege of occupancy within the City? The tax imposed by this Ordinance is expected to generate $19,000 in annual revenue and will continue in effect until later repealed.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3586, "fingerprint": "2018|201800167|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800167|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "a8efc6bb8183c298", "measure_id": "201800167", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to add a one-quarter of one percent supplemental transaction and use tax to fund street, road, and alleyway maintenance and pothole repair, raising approximately 2.2 million dollars annually, with the following restrictions? - The tax will expire after twenty years, unless reauthorized by voters. - A citizens\u2019 oversight committee shall be established to conduct annual audits of all expenditures generated by the tax to ensure fiscal accountability and public participation.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5882, "no_votes": 3273, "total_votes": 9155, "percent_yes": 64.24904423812124, "percent_no": 35.75095576187876, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Eureka Municipal Code to add a 0", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Eureka Municipal Code to add a 0.25% supplemental sales tax dedicated to funding street, road, and alleyway maintenance and pothole repair, generating approximately $2.2 million annually. The tax includes a 20-year expiration date and requires establishment of a citizens' oversight committee to conduct annual audits of expenditures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.027857", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.512581", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to add a one-quarter of one percent supplemental transaction and use tax to fund street, road, and alleyway maintenance and pothole repair, raising approximately 2.2 million dollars annually, with the following restrictions? - The tax will expire after twenty years, unless reauthorized by voters. - A citizens\u2019 oversight committee shall be established to conduct annual audits of all expenditures generated by the tax to ensure fiscal accountability and public participation.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3587, "fingerprint": "2018|201800168|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800168|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "8ef4e190899e5ebc", "measure_id": "201800168", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Rio Dell continue to impose a one percent (1.0%) transaction and use tax with all proceeds placed in the City\u2019s General Fund to be used for any governmental purpose? The tax authorized by this Ordinance is expected to generate $245,000 in annual revenue and will continue in effect until December 31, 2024.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 475, "no_votes": 463, "total_votes": 938, "percent_yes": 50.63965884861408, "percent_no": 49.36034115138592, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continued a 1% sales tax in Rio Dell through December 31, 2024, ...", "summary_text": "This measure continued a 1% sales tax in Rio Dell through December 31, 2024, with proceeds going to the city's general fund for any governmental purpose and expected to generate $245,000 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.028135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.512771", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Rio Dell continue to impose a one percent (1.0%) transaction and use tax with all proceeds placed in the City\u2019s General Fund to be used for any governmental purpose? The tax authorized by this Ordinance is expected to generate $245,000 in annual revenue and will continue in effect until December 31, 2024.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3582, "fingerprint": "2018|201800026|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800026|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "bd2d404f29bd4379", "measure_id": "201800026", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure be adopted that would establish prohibitions, restrictions and policies governing the use of county funds and actions of county law enforcement officials and other county agencies regarding cooperation with federal civil immigration enforcement, and regarding access to county services for all residents, and prioritize parental choices when families are separated, but that would not prevent immigrants from being investigated or prosecuted for criminal activity?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28139, "no_votes": 22733, "total_votes": 50872, "percent_yes": 55.31333543009907, "percent_no": 44.68666456990093, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes prohibitions and restrictions on how Humboldt County ...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes prohibitions and restrictions on how Humboldt County funds can be used and how county law enforcement and agencies can cooperate with federal immigration enforcement, while ensuring access to county services for all residents and prioritizing parental choices during family separations. It does not prevent immigrants from being investigated or prosecuted for criminal activity.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.026675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.511834", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure be adopted that would establish prohibitions, restrictions and policies governing the use of county funds and actions of county law enforcement officials and other county agencies regarding cooperation with federal civil immigration enforcement, and regarding access to county services for all residents, and prioritize parental choices when families are separated, but that would not prevent immigrants from being investigated or prosecuted for criminal activity?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3592, "fingerprint": "2018|201800526|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800526|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "4086af6720c71200", "measure_id": "201800526", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize/upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, repair/replace leaky roofs, and increase student access to computers/modern technology that improves the quality of education, shall Cutten School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds, with legal rates, projected average annual levies of $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds are outstanding (an estimated $140,000 on average raised annually), annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for administrator salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1535, "no_votes": 702, "total_votes": 2237, "percent_yes": 68.61868573983013, "percent_no": 31.381314260169873, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Cutten School District to issue $4 million in bon...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Cutten School District to issue $4 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, repair roofs, and upgrade technology. The bonds would be repaid through property tax assessments of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.029640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.513721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize/upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, repair/replace leaky roofs, and increase student access to computers/modern technology that improves the quality of education, shall Cutten School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds, with legal rates, projected average annual levies of $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds are outstanding (an estimated $140,000 on average raised annually), annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for administrator salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3584, "fingerprint": "2018|201800165|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800165|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "6aef628eabb5970e", "measure_id": "201800165", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative measure, \u2018An Initiative to Prohibit the Modification and/or Destruction of the President William McKinley Statue and its Base and/or the Relocation from Its Historic Place in the Center of the Arcata Plaza,\u2019 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2461, "no_votes": 5185, "total_votes": 7646, "percent_yes": 32.1867643212137, "percent_no": 67.8132356787863, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have prohibited modifying, destroying, or relocating th...", "summary_text": "This initiative would have prohibited modifying, destroying, or relocating the President William McKinley statue and its base from its location in the center of Arcata Plaza. The measure sought to preserve the statue in its current form and historic placement.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.027298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.512211", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative measure, \u2018An Initiative to Prohibit the Modification and/or Destruction of the President William McKinley Statue and its Base and/or the Relocation from Its Historic Place in the Center of the Arcata Plaza,\u2019 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3593, "fingerprint": "2018|201800527|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800527|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "885f43829a39f6b7", "measure_id": "201800527", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Northern Humboldt Union High School District issue $24,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $554,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 1.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13979, "no_votes": 5309, "total_votes": 19288, "percent_yes": 72.4751140605558, "percent_no": 27.524885939444204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Northern Humboldt Union High School District to i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Northern Humboldt Union High School District to issue $24 million in bonds to repair roofs, upgrade electrical systems, and modernize classrooms and school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 1.9 cents per $100 of assessed value and would be overseen by an independent citizens' committee.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.029986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.513916", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Northern Humboldt Union High School District issue $24,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $554,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 1.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3583, "fingerprint": "2018|201800027|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800027|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "20326cd3ca72221e", "measure_id": "201800027", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain essential services including 911 emergency response/rural ambulance/fire protection; ensuring 24-hour sheriff\u2019s patrols; providing children\u2019s mental health/victims of child abuse services; emergency communications systems; repairing deteriorating roads; and other essential general services, shall a measure to renew the existing \u00bd -cent sales tax, generating approximately $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters, with annual audits/citizen oversight, no increase in tax rate, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38029, "no_votes": 13453, "total_votes": 51482, "percent_yes": 73.8685365758906, "percent_no": 26.1314634241094, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would renew an existing half-cent sales tax in Humboldt County t...", "summary_text": "This measure would renew an existing half-cent sales tax in Humboldt County to fund various public services including emergency response, law enforcement patrols, mental health services, road repairs, and other general government services. The tax would generate approximately $12 million annually and continue until terminated by voters, with provisions for annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.026947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.512017", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential services including 911 emergency response/rural ambulance/fire protection; ensuring 24-hour sheriff\u2019s patrols; providing children\u2019s mental health/victims of child abuse services; emergency communications systems; repairing deteriorating roads; and other essential general services, shall a measure to renew the existing \u00bd -cent sales tax, generating approximately $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters, with annual audits/citizen oversight, no increase in tax rate, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3605, "fingerprint": "2018|201800530|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800530|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "046500f89483a395", "measure_id": "201800530", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade classrooms technology; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall the Heber Elementary School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $300,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 784, "no_votes": 290, "total_votes": 1074, "percent_yes": 72.99813780260708, "percent_no": 27.001862197392924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Heber Elementary School District to issue $4 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Heber Elementary School District to issue $4 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, upgrade technology, and make health and safety improvements. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $300,000 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.033423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.516287", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade classrooms technology; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall the Heber Elementary School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $300,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3607, "fingerprint": "2018|201800532|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800532|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "574dfecff117a5fb", "measure_id": "201800532", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new gymnasium, enhance student safety and security, construct and modernize classrooms and support facilities, an provide the local match for State grants, shall the measure of Westmorland Union Elementary School District be adopted authorizing $10,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of $648,000 annually to repay issued bonds through final maturity from levies of approximately $0.091 per $100 of assessed valuation, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 297, "no_votes": 163, "total_votes": 460, "percent_yes": 64.56521739130436, "percent_no": 35.43478260869564, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Westmorland Union Elementary School Dis...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Westmorland Union Elementary School District to issue $10 million in bonds to construct a new gymnasium, modernize classrooms and facilities, enhance safety and security, and provide matching funds for state grants. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately $0.091 per $100 of assessed valuation, raising an average of $648,000 annually until maturity.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.033982", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.516665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new gymnasium, enhance student safety and security, construct and modernize classrooms and support facilities, an provide the local match for State grants, shall the measure of Westmorland Union Elementary School District be adopted authorizing $10,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of $648,000 annually to repay issued bonds through final maturity from levies of approximately $0.091 per $100 of assessed valuation, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3604, "fingerprint": "2018|201800529|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800529|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "6098b85400db547f", "measure_id": "201800529", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and construct a new science/STEM building; shall the Brawley Union High School District issue $18,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $1,090,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3699, "no_votes": 2022, "total_votes": 5721, "percent_yes": 64.65652857891978, "percent_no": 35.343471421080224, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Brawley Union High School District to issue $18", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Brawley Union High School District to issue $18.7 million in bonds to repair roofs, modernize classrooms and facilities, and construct a new science/STEM building. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $1.09 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.033159", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.516105", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and construct a new science/STEM building; shall the Brawley Union High School District issue $18,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $1,090,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3601, "fingerprint": "2018|201800175|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800175|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "201800175", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233, "no_votes": 134, "total_votes": 367, "percent_yes": 63.48773841961853, "percent_no": 36.51226158038147, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.032253", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.515542", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3602, "fingerprint": "2018|201800176|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800176|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "201800176", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 227, "no_votes": 137, "total_votes": 364, "percent_yes": 62.362637362637365, "percent_no": 37.637362637362635, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the City of Imperial's treasurer position from an electe...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the City of Imperial's treasurer position from an elected office to one appointed by the city government.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.032522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.515739", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3606, "fingerprint": "2018|201800531|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800531|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "faee1dae80a07598", "measure_id": "201800531", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and construct a new gymnasium/multipurpose room for school and community use; shall Holtville Unified School District issue $10 million of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $617,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1437, "no_votes": 556, "total_votes": 1993, "percent_yes": 72.10235825388861, "percent_no": 27.89764174611139, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Holtville Unified School District to issue $10 mi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Holtville Unified School District to issue $10 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, and construct a new gymnasium/multipurpose room. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 4 cents per $100 of assessed value, with oversight provisions including annual audits and a citizens' committee.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.033690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.516479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and construct a new gymnasium/multipurpose room for school and community use; shall Holtville Unified School District issue $10 million of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $617,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3597, "fingerprint": "2018|201800171|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800171|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "bf3ff729c2f3efe4", "measure_id": "201800171", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1966, "no_votes": 1825, "total_votes": 3791, "percent_yes": 51.85966763386969, "percent_no": 48.14033236613031, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would change the City Treasurer position in Imperial, Cal...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would change the City Treasurer position in Imperial, California from an elected office to one appointed by the city government. The measure passed with 51.9% voter approval in 2018.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.031119", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.514665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3598, "fingerprint": "2018|201800172|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800172|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "a86b611e2ae2aff7", "measure_id": "201800172", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $40,000 to $60,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2957, "no_votes": 924, "total_votes": 3881, "percent_yes": 76.19170316928626, "percent_no": 23.808296830713743, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Imperial to tax cannabis businesses at ra...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Imperial to tax cannabis businesses at rates up to $10 per square foot annually for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis businesses to fund general municipal expenses. The tax was expected to generate $40,000 to $60,000 annually and would remain in effect until repealed by voters or the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.031418", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.514926", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $40,000 to $60,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3595, "fingerprint": "2018|201800169|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800169|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "a4b519b34ae1a794", "measure_id": "201800169", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve general City services, such as police service levels, street operations and maintenance, as well as parks, community buildings and infrastructure; shall the City of Calexico adopt an ordinance to increase the Transient Occupancy (\"Hotel\") Tax from 10.00% to 12.00%, and to modernize its Transient Occupancy Tax regulations, generating approximately $230,000.00 annually until ended by voters?\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4028, "no_votes": 2897, "total_votes": 6925, "percent_yes": 58.16606498194946, "percent_no": 41.83393501805054, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have increased Calexico's transient occupancy tax on hotel ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have increased Calexico's transient occupancy tax on hotel stays from 10% to 12% and updated related regulations, generating an estimated $230,000 annually for general city services including police, street maintenance, parks, and infrastructure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.030583", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.514296", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve general City services, such as police service levels, street operations and maintenance, as well as parks, community buildings and infrastructure; shall the City of Calexico adopt an ordinance to increase the Transient Occupancy (\"Hotel\") Tax from 10.00% to 12.00%, and to modernize its Transient Occupancy Tax regulations, generating approximately $230,000.00 annually until ended by voters?\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3596, "fingerprint": "2018|201800170|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800170|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "e58c807c88c52d51", "measure_id": "201800170", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Calexico adopt an ordinance enacting a tax on cannabis businesses of up to $25 per square foot of space utilized, and up to 15% of gross receipts from the sale of cannabis and related products, generating approximately $700,000 annually for general City services, such as police and emergency response, parks, youth/senior services, and street repair, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5049, "no_votes": 1818, "total_votes": 6867, "percent_yes": 73.52555701179554, "percent_no": 26.47444298820446, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a tax on cannabis businesses in Calexico of up to $25 pe...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a tax on cannabis businesses in Calexico of up to $25 per square foot and up to 15% of gross receipts from cannabis sales. The tax was projected to generate approximately $700,000 annually for general city services including police, emergency response, parks, youth and senior services, and street repair.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.030850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.514480", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Calexico adopt an ordinance enacting a tax on cannabis businesses of up to $25 per square foot of space utilized, and up to 15% of gross receipts from the sale of cannabis and related products, generating approximately $700,000 annually for general City services, such as police and emergency response, parks, youth/senior services, and street repair, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3599, "fingerprint": "2018|201800173|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800173|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "7cfca0d6ebb04ec6", "measure_id": "201800173", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sally Traylor be recalled (removed) from the office of City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 274, "no_votes": 87, "total_votes": 361, "percent_yes": 75.90027700831024, "percent_no": 24.09972299168976, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Sally Traylor from her position a...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Sally Traylor from her position as City Clerk in Imperial, California. The recall passed with 75.9% of voters choosing to remove her from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.031728", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.515113", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sally Traylor be recalled (removed) from the office of City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3600, "fingerprint": "2018|201800174|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800174|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "9052d76ea2a464f2", "measure_id": "201800174", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Mary Ann Smith be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 264, "no_votes": 93, "total_votes": 357, "percent_yes": 73.94957983193278, "percent_no": 26.05042016806722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall and remove Mary Ann Smith ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall and remove Mary Ann Smith from her position as a city councilmember in Imperial, California. The measure passed with 73.9% of voters choosing to remove Smith from office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.031991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.515294", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Mary Ann Smith be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3594, "fingerprint": "2018|201800028|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800028|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "dbb70af48356c51c", "measure_id": "201800028", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To fund and improve County services, shall the ordinance enacting the following general taxes on cannabis be adopted? (1) Maximum 8% on the gross receipts of retailers of cannabis products; (2) Maximum 5% on the gross receipts of manufacturers of cannabis products; (3) Maximum $15.00 per square foot on commercial cannabis cultivation space, increasing to maximum $20.00 per square foot on July 1, 2020 and maximum $25.00 per square foot on July 1, 2025.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12020, "no_votes": 5546, "total_votes": 17566, "percent_yes": 68.42764431287715, "percent_no": 31.57235568712285, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted general taxes on cannabis businesses in Imperial County,...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted general taxes on cannabis businesses in Imperial County, including up to 8% on retail gross receipts, up to 5% on manufacturing gross receipts, and per-square-foot taxes on cultivation space starting at $15 and increasing to $25 by 2025. The revenue would fund county services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.030253", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.514111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund and improve County services, shall the ordinance enacting the following general taxes on cannabis be adopted? (1) Maximum 8% on the gross receipts of retailers of cannabis products; (2) Maximum 5% on the gross receipts of manufacturers of cannabis products; (3) Maximum $15.00 per square foot on commercial cannabis cultivation space, increasing to maximum $20.00 per square foot on July 1, 2020 and maximum $25.00 per square foot on July 1, 2025.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3603, "fingerprint": "2018|201800528|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800528|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "d4827e7d07bdf488", "measure_id": "201800528", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new gymnasium, enhance student safety and security, construct and modernize classrooms and support facilities, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the measure of Westmorland Union Elementary School District be adopted authorizing $10,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of $656,000 annually to repay issued bonds through final maturity from levies of approximately $0.098 per $100 of assessed valuation, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 223, "no_votes": 133, "total_votes": 356, "percent_yes": 62.64044943820225, "percent_no": 37.35955056179775, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Westmorland Union Elementary School Di...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Westmorland Union Elementary School District to issue $10 million in bonds to construct a new gymnasium, modernize classrooms and support facilities, enhance safety and security, and provide local matching funds for state grants. The bonds would have been repaid through property tax levies of approximately $0.098 per $100 of assessed valuation, raising an average of $656,000 annually until maturity.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.032790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.515924", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new gymnasium, enhance student safety and security, construct and modernize classrooms and support facilities, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the measure of Westmorland Union Elementary School District be adopted authorizing $10,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of $656,000 annually to repay issued bonds through final maturity from levies of approximately $0.098 per $100 of assessed valuation, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3608, "fingerprint": "2018|201800533|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800533|INYO", "content_hash": "f7dac940529ba6f3", "measure_id": "201800533", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve school facilities, upgrade fire alarms and student safety and security, replace old windows, and repair restrooms and other facilities, shall Lone Pine Unified School District issue $6 million in bonds at legal interest rates, projected tax rates of 6% per $100 of taxable value while bonds are outstanding (averaging approximately $400,000 annually), and requiring responsible repayment costs, citizens' oversight and audits to ensure funds are ONLY spent for Lo-Inyo Elementary School and Lone Pine High School, and NOT for any other purpose?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 271, "no_votes": 354, "total_votes": 625, "percent_yes": 43.36, "percent_no": 56.64, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Lone Pine Unified School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Lone Pine Unified School District to issue $6 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including fire alarms, security upgrades, window replacements, and restroom repairs at Lo-Inyo Elementary School and Lone Pine High School. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a projected rate of 6% per $100 of taxable value while outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.034306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.516849", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve school facilities, upgrade fire alarms and student safety and security, replace old windows, and repair restrooms and other facilities, shall Lone Pine Unified School District issue $6 million in bonds at legal interest rates, projected tax rates of 6% per $100 of taxable value while bonds are outstanding (averaging approximately $400,000 annually), and requiring responsible repayment costs, citizens' oversight and audits to ensure funds are ONLY spent for Lo-Inyo Elementary School and Lone Pine High School, and NOT for any other purpose?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3609, "fingerprint": "2018|201800534|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800534|INYO", "content_hash": "5ec4c8dbc1a0f810", "measure_id": "201800534", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and upgrade classrooms, repair old facilities, make health, safety and security improvements for students, and improve energy efficiency to reduce operating costs, shall Owens Valley Unified School District issue $4.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, projected tax rates of 6.0\u00a2 per $100 of taxable value while bonds are outstanding (generating on average approximately $325,000 annually), and requiring audits, citizens' oversight, ALL funds spent on Owens Valley schools and NO money for administrator salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126, "no_votes": 138, "total_votes": 264, "percent_yes": 47.72727272727273, "percent_no": 52.27272727272727, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Owens Valley Unified School District to...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Owens Valley Unified School District to issue $4.8 million in bonds to renovate classrooms, repair facilities, and make health, safety, security, and energy efficiency improvements. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a projected rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.034617", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.517034", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and upgrade classrooms, repair old facilities, make health, safety and security improvements for students, and improve energy efficiency to reduce operating costs, shall Owens Valley Unified School District issue $4.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, projected tax rates of 6.0\u00a2 per $100 of taxable value while bonds are outstanding (generating on average approximately $325,000 annually), and requiring audits, citizens' oversight, ALL funds spent on Owens Valley schools and NO money for administrator salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3619, "fingerprint": "2018|201800536|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800536|KERN", "content_hash": "e8aee22bc15ac045", "measure_id": "201800536", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Taft College; upgrade job training, dental hygiene, science/technology facilities; repair roofs; remove asbestos/lead paint; construct/acquire facilities/land sites/equipment to prepare students/veterans for jobs/college transfers shall West Kern Community College District's measure be adopted to issue $50,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, averaging $3,000,000 raised annually for bonds through maturity, rates of approximately 2.5\u00a2/$100 assessed value, with independent audits/citizens' oversight and all funds benefiting students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1253, "no_votes": 1308, "total_votes": 2561, "percent_yes": 48.92620070285045, "percent_no": 51.07379929714955, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the West Kern Community College District to...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the West Kern Community College District to issue $50 million in bonds to upgrade facilities at Taft College, including job training and science/technology facilities, roof repairs, asbestos/lead paint removal, and construction of new facilities and equipment. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.037700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.518933", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Taft College; upgrade job training, dental hygiene, science/technology facilities; repair roofs; remove asbestos/lead paint; construct/acquire facilities/land sites/equipment to prepare students/veterans for jobs/college transfers shall West Kern Community College District's measure be adopted to issue $50,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, averaging $3,000,000 raised annually for bonds through maturity, rates of approximately 2.5\u00a2/$100 assessed value, with independent audits/citizens' oversight and all funds benefiting students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3618, "fingerprint": "2018|201800535|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800535|KERN", "content_hash": "0aa6323a6d0b191c", "measure_id": "201800535", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to modern technology; shall El Tejon Unified School District issue $16,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $900,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 5.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1054, "no_votes": 749, "total_votes": 1803, "percent_yes": 58.458125346644486, "percent_no": 41.541874653355514, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized El Tejon Unified School District to issue $16 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized El Tejon Unified School District to issue $16 million in bonds to fund classroom modernization, health and safety improvements, facility upgrades, and technology access. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 5.7 cents per $100 of assessed value, with oversight by an independent citizens' committee and annual audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.037324", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.518747", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to modern technology; shall El Tejon Unified School District issue $16,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $900,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 5.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3622, "fingerprint": "2018|201800539|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800539|KERN", "content_hash": "8bcecd67b93bd7fd", "measure_id": "201800539", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Wasco Union High School by upgrading facilities, including new gymnasium and swimming pool; repairing, constructing, reconstructing and equipping educational facilities to better serve students and community; to qualify for potential State matching funds, shall Wasco Union High School District issue $40,500,000 in bonds repaying an annual average of $2,650,000, at approximately $29.65 per $100,000 of assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, at legal interest rates, with no funding for employee salaries or pensions, and required audits and citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1838, "no_votes": 1526, "total_votes": 3364, "percent_yes": 54.63733650416172, "percent_no": 45.36266349583828, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Wasco Union High School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Wasco Union High School District to issue $40.5 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including a new gymnasium and swimming pool, repairs, construction, and equipment upgrades. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately $29.65 per $100,000 of assessed property value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.038674", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.519486", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Wasco Union High School by upgrading facilities, including new gymnasium and swimming pool; repairing, constructing, reconstructing and equipping educational facilities to better serve students and community; to qualify for potential State matching funds, shall Wasco Union High School District issue $40,500,000 in bonds repaying an annual average of $2,650,000, at approximately $29.65 per $100,000 of assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, at legal interest rates, with no funding for employee salaries or pensions, and required audits and citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3620, "fingerprint": "2018|201800537|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800537|KERN", "content_hash": "3c922f6442bb9c5c", "measure_id": "201800537", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair or replace aging schools with safe, modernized facilities, improve student safety and security, rehabilitate deteriorated roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, upgrade technology, acquire, construct, repair, and equip schools, and provide access to facilities needed for success, shall Arvin Union School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying on average $900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, with independent citizens' oversight and all money dedicated to Arvin schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1401, "no_votes": 500, "total_votes": 1901, "percent_yes": 73.69805365597054, "percent_no": 26.30194634402946, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Arvin Union School District to issue $15 million ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Arvin Union School District to issue $15 million in bonds to repair, replace, and modernize school facilities, including infrastructure improvements and technology upgrades. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an average rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.037985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.519120", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair or replace aging schools with safe, modernized facilities, improve student safety and security, rehabilitate deteriorated roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, upgrade technology, acquire, construct, repair, and equip schools, and provide access to facilities needed for success, shall Arvin Union School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying on average $900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, with independent citizens' oversight and all money dedicated to Arvin schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3621, "fingerprint": "2018|201800538|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800538|KERN", "content_hash": "f420c4f125b5aa3b", "measure_id": "201800538", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve school safety and security, construct/equip new school facilities to relieve severe overcrowding, and repair/upgrade older classrooms, labs, facilities and instructional technology supporting student achievement/college readiness in math, science, engineering, technology, arts, shall Panama-Buena Vista Union School District issue $90 million in bonds, at legal rates, an estimated 3 cents per $100 assessed value (averaging $18 million annually) for approximately 20 years to improve neighborhood K-8 schools, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21711, "no_votes": 12879, "total_votes": 34590, "percent_yes": 62.76669557675629, "percent_no": 37.23330442324371, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Panama-Buena Vista Union School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Panama-Buena Vista Union School District to issue $90 million in bonds to construct new school facilities, improve safety and security, and repair older classrooms and labs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value over approximately 20 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.038370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.519301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve school safety and security, construct/equip new school facilities to relieve severe overcrowding, and repair/upgrade older classrooms, labs, facilities and instructional technology supporting student achievement/college readiness in math, science, engineering, technology, arts, shall Panama-Buena Vista Union School District issue $90 million in bonds, at legal rates, an estimated 3 cents per $100 assessed value (averaging $18 million annually) for approximately 20 years to improve neighborhood K-8 schools, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3612, "fingerprint": "2018|201800031|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800031|KERN", "content_hash": "ac41e96e9126c6bc", "measure_id": "201800031", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve county services in the unincorporated area of Kern County including public safety and protection, parks, code enforcement, roads and libraries, shall a 1% (1 cent) general purpose sales tax be adopted in the unincorporated area with the estimated $35 million in annual revenue to be used for general purposes in the unincorporated area only with input from a citizen advisory committee comprised of residents of the \r\nunincorporated area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25610, "no_votes": 46899, "total_votes": 72509, "percent_yes": 35.31975340992153, "percent_no": 64.68024659007847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a 1% general purpose sales tax in unincorpora...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a 1% general purpose sales tax in unincorporated areas of Kern County, generating an estimated $35 million annually for county services including public safety, parks, code enforcement, roads, and libraries. Revenue would have been used exclusively in unincorporated areas with oversight from a citizen advisory committee of unincorporated area residents.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.035449", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.517647", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve county services in the unincorporated area of Kern County including public safety and protection, parks, code enforcement, roads and libraries, shall a 1% (1 cent) general purpose sales tax be adopted in the unincorporated area with the estimated $35 million in annual revenue to be used for general purposes in the unincorporated area only with input from a citizen advisory committee comprised of residents of the \r\nunincorporated area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3610, "fingerprint": "2018|201800029|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800029|KERN", "content_hash": "5613a4dd1ea28ddd", "measure_id": "201800029", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall County adopt the ordinance proposed by initiative petition and known as Medicinal Cannabis Measure to retain the ban on commercial adult-use cannabis activity; allow and regulate commercial medicinal cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, testing, retailing, distribution, and microbusiness in the unincorporated area, subject to State licensing requirements; allow unlimited land use permits for such activity; and allow County to levy a perpetual 7.5% business tax on the adjusted gross income of such activity [fiscal impact unknown]?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 77680, "no_votes": 117156, "total_votes": 194836, "percent_yes": 39.86942864768318, "percent_no": 60.13057135231682, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have maintained the ban on commercial adult-use cannabis i...", "summary_text": "This measure would have maintained the ban on commercial adult-use cannabis in unincorporated Kern County while allowing and regulating commercial medicinal cannabis operations including cultivation, manufacturing, testing, retail, distribution, and microbusiness activities. It would have imposed a 7.5% business tax on the adjusted gross income of permitted medicinal cannabis businesses and allowed unlimited land use permits for such operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.034883", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.517232", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall County adopt the ordinance proposed by initiative petition and known as Medicinal Cannabis Measure to retain the ban on commercial adult-use cannabis activity; allow and regulate commercial medicinal cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, testing, retailing, distribution, and microbusiness in the unincorporated area, subject to State licensing requirements; allow unlimited land use permits for such activity; and allow County to levy a perpetual 7.5% business tax on the adjusted gross income of such activity [fiscal impact unknown]?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3611, "fingerprint": "2018|201800030|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800030|KERN", "content_hash": "94951ada0629f72e", "measure_id": "201800030", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall County adopt the ordinance proposed by initiative petition and known as Kem Regulation and Taxation of Cannabis Act of 2018 to allow and regulate commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis retailing, testing, cultivation, processing, packaging, and distribution in the unincorporated area, subject to State licensing requirements; impose permit fees on cannabis businesses; allow no more than 35 dispensary permits; and levy a perpetual 5% annual tax on the gross receipts of dispensaries [fiscal impact unknown]?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92634, "no_votes": 101877, "total_votes": 194511, "percent_yes": 47.6240418279686, "percent_no": 52.3759581720314, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have allowed and regulated commercial cannabis businesses i...", "summary_text": "The measure would have allowed and regulated commercial cannabis businesses in unincorporated Kern County, including retail dispensaries (capped at 35 permits), cultivation, processing, and distribution operations, while imposing permit fees and a 5% tax on dispensary gross receipts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.035145", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.517459", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall County adopt the ordinance proposed by initiative petition and known as Kem Regulation and Taxation of Cannabis Act of 2018 to allow and regulate commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis retailing, testing, cultivation, processing, packaging, and distribution in the unincorporated area, subject to State licensing requirements; impose permit fees on cannabis businesses; allow no more than 35 dispensary permits; and levy a perpetual 5% annual tax on the gross receipts of dispensaries [fiscal impact unknown]?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3613, "fingerprint": "2018|201800177|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800177|KERN", "content_hash": "f50ad114415faae5", "measure_id": "201800177", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure establishing a utility users tax of up to a maximum of 7% on charges for telecommunications, video, electricity and gas services to raise approximately $700,000 to be spent for city services, including police, fire, and other emergency services, and street, sidewalk, sewer, public works improvements and other unrestricted purposes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 530, "no_votes": 1310, "total_votes": 1840, "percent_yes": 28.80434782608695, "percent_no": 71.19565217391305, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a utility users tax of up to 7% on teleco...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a utility users tax of up to 7% on telecommunications, video, electricity and gas services to generate approximately $700,000 annually for city services including police, fire, emergency services, and infrastructure improvements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.035892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.517836", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure establishing a utility users tax of up to a maximum of 7% on charges for telecommunications, video, electricity and gas services to raise approximately $700,000 to be spent for city services, including police, fire, and other emergency services, and street, sidewalk, sewer, public works improvements and other unrestricted purposes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3614, "fingerprint": "2018|201800178|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800178|KERN", "content_hash": "a548a77e21a5f2ef", "measure_id": "201800178", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure establishing a tax of up to 6% of gross revenues on commercial cannabis business operations, excepting cultivation, and a tax of up to $6 per square foot of space used for commercial cannabis cultivation, as adjusted annually by CPI, all as described in the Ordinance enacting the tax, to raise approximately $150,000 to $300,000 annually for unrestricted purposes, including police, fire, and public improvements, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1037, "no_votes": 795, "total_votes": 1832, "percent_yes": 56.604803493449786, "percent_no": 43.395196506550214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a tax of up to 6% of gross revenues on commercial ca...", "summary_text": "This measure established a tax of up to 6% of gross revenues on commercial cannabis businesses (except cultivation) and up to $6 per square foot on cannabis cultivation operations in Kern, California. The tax revenue, estimated at $150,000 to $300,000 annually and adjusted for inflation, goes to the city's general fund for unrestricted municipal purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.036169", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.518017", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure establishing a tax of up to 6% of gross revenues on commercial cannabis business operations, excepting cultivation, and a tax of up to $6 per square foot of space used for commercial cannabis cultivation, as adjusted annually by CPI, all as described in the Ordinance enacting the tax, to raise approximately $150,000 to $300,000 annually for unrestricted purposes, including police, fire, and public improvements, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3615, "fingerprint": "2018|201800179|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800179|KERN", "content_hash": "f4ae828d8a6dd821", "measure_id": "201800179", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent cuts/improve 911 emergency response, police/fire protection, anti-gang/drug units, neighborhood police patrols; rapid response to assaults, robberies, gang violence, home burglaries; crime prevention; address homelessness; retain, attract jobs/businesses; unrestricted general revenue purposes; shall the measure be adopted approving an ordinance establishing a one-cent sales tax providing $50,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, citizens oversight, all funds for Bakersfield?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45835, "no_votes": 45738, "total_votes": 91573, "percent_yes": 50.05296320967971, "percent_no": 49.94703679032029, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in Bakersfield to generate appr...", "summary_text": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in Bakersfield to generate approximately $50 million annually for general city services including police, fire, emergency response, and other municipal purposes. The tax requires independent audits and citizen oversight and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.036435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.518198", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent cuts/improve 911 emergency response, police/fire protection, anti-gang/drug units, neighborhood police patrols; rapid response to assaults, robberies, gang violence, home burglaries; crime prevention; address homelessness; retain, attract jobs/businesses; unrestricted general revenue purposes; shall the measure be adopted approving an ordinance establishing a one-cent sales tax providing $50,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, citizens oversight, all funds for Bakersfield?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3616, "fingerprint": "2018|201800180|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800180|KERN", "content_hash": "5a28e27bd4b53af2", "measure_id": "201800180", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Bakersfield adopt the following law: Shall the measure amending the Bakersfield Municipal Code to allow medical marijuana store front dispensaries, cultivation sites, manufacturers, distributors, and delivery operations with a valid permit, and which will impose a 7.5% excise tax that will last until terminated by voters, [based on current information, fiscal impact is unknown,] be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43838, "no_votes": 47656, "total_votes": 91494, "percent_yes": 47.91352438411262, "percent_no": 52.08647561588738, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended Bakersfield's Municipal Code to allow various...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended Bakersfield's Municipal Code to allow various types of medical marijuana businesses including dispensaries, cultivation sites, manufacturers, distributors, and delivery operations with valid permits. It also would have imposed a 7.5% excise tax on these operations that would remain in effect until terminated by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.036716", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.518384", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Bakersfield adopt the following law: Shall the measure amending the Bakersfield Municipal Code to allow medical marijuana store front dispensaries, cultivation sites, manufacturers, distributors, and delivery operations with a valid permit, and which will impose a 7.5% excise tax that will last until terminated by voters, [based on current information, fiscal impact is unknown,] be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3617, "fingerprint": "2018|201800181|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800181|KERN", "content_hash": "27743f25a9c2bc3a", "measure_id": "201800181", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain vital services, improve McFarland's streets and roads, maintain local police and fire protection and 911-emergency response times; shall the city of McFarland enact a utility users tax at the rate of five percent for all utilities, for ten years, providing approximately four hundred ninety-four thousand dollars annually with exemptions for senior citizens and funds used only in McFarland, subject to independent financial audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 653, "no_votes": 890, "total_votes": 1543, "percent_yes": 42.3201555411536, "percent_no": 57.6798444588464, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted a 5% utility users tax in McFarland for ten ye...", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted a 5% utility users tax in McFarland for ten years to generate approximately $494,000 annually for city services including street maintenance, police, fire protection, and emergency response. The tax would have included exemptions for senior citizens and required independent audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.036981", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.518567", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain vital services, improve McFarland's streets and roads, maintain local police and fire protection and 911-emergency response times; shall the city of McFarland enact a utility users tax at the rate of five percent for all utilities, for ten years, providing approximately four hundred ninety-four thousand dollars annually with exemptions for senior citizens and funds used only in McFarland, subject to independent financial audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3625, "fingerprint": "2018|201800540|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800540|KINGS", "content_hash": "a514ccf556b93c35", "measure_id": "201800540", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve P.E. fields and facilities; shall Laton Joint Unified School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $421,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34, "no_votes": 29, "total_votes": 63, "percent_yes": 53.96825396825397, "percent_no": 46.03174603174603, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have authorized Laton Joint Unified School District...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have authorized Laton Joint Unified School District to issue $7 million in bonds to modernize and construct school facilities, improve health and safety features, and upgrade physical education facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.039634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.520031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve P.E. fields and facilities; shall Laton Joint Unified School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $421,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3624, "fingerprint": "2018|201800183|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800183|KINGS", "content_hash": "6de6f346db00c3a3", "measure_id": "201800183", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $750,000 to $1 million annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10037, "no_votes": 3870, "total_votes": 13907, "percent_yes": 72.17228733731214, "percent_no": 27.82771266268786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes the City of Kings to tax cannabis businesses at rates...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes the City of Kings to tax cannabis businesses at rates up to $10 per square foot annually for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis businesses to fund general municipal services. The tax is expected to generate $750,000 to $1 million annually and continues until repealed by voters or the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.039331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.519847", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $750,000 to $1 million annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11181, "fingerprint": "2018|201800541|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800541|KINGS", "content_hash": "62275248732b429d", "measure_id": "201800541", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities and construct a new elementary school to reduce student overcrowding, shall Lemoore Union Elementary School District issue $26,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $1,400,000 annually as long as bonds\u00b7 are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4085, "no_votes": 2440, "total_votes": 6525, "percent_yes": 62.605363984674334, "percent_no": 37.394636015325666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Lemoore Union Elementary School District to issue...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Lemoore Union Elementary School District to issue $26 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, and construct a new elementary school to address overcrowding. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating about $1.4 million annually while outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.540402", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.039969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.520219", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities and construct a new elementary school to reduce student overcrowding, shall Lemoore Union Elementary School District issue $26,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $1,400,000 annually as long as bonds\u00b7 are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3623, "fingerprint": "2018|201800182|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800182|KINGS", "content_hash": "42c9dc94df7f4cd3", "measure_id": "201800182", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Francisco Ramirez be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, District D", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 239, "no_votes": 151, "total_votes": 390, "percent_yes": 61.282051282051285, "percent_no": 38.717948717948715, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Francisco Ramirez from his positi...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall Francisco Ramirez from his position as City Council Member for District D in Kings, California. The recall passed with 61.3% of voters choosing to remove him from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-01-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.039029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.519667", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Francisco Ramirez be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, District D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3626, "fingerprint": "2018|201800032|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800032|LAKE", "content_hash": "1b7f5261d7327cfd", "measure_id": "201800032", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special annual tax of $50.00 per-year-per-single-lot be imposed on all the single lots within Butler-Keys F Community Services District for a period of four (4) years commencing in the 2018-2019 fiscal year for the purpose of maintaining the streets within the Butler-Keys Community Services District and shall the District establish an annual appropriations limit in the amount of $9,250.00?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 39, "percent_yes": 76.92307692307693, "percent_no": 23.076923076923066, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a $50 annual tax on each single lot within the Butler-Ke...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a $50 annual tax on each single lot within the Butler-Keys F Community Services District for four years starting in fiscal year 2018-2019 to fund street maintenance. It also established an annual appropriations limit of $9,250 for the district.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.040305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.520407", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special annual tax of $50.00 per-year-per-single-lot be imposed on all the single lots within Butler-Keys F Community Services District for a period of four (4) years commencing in the 2018-2019 fiscal year for the purpose of maintaining the streets within the Butler-Keys Community Services District and shall the District establish an annual appropriations limit in the amount of $9,250.00?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3627, "fingerprint": "2018|201800033|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800033|LAKE", "content_hash": "990160b41af6c943", "measure_id": "201800033", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County Measure be adopted to add Article VII to Chapter 18 of the Lake County Code imposing a one and G one-half per cent (1.5%) transactions and use tax (sales tax) for a ten-year period, generating approximately $4.5mil lion annually, for unrestricted general revenue purposes to include roads, libraries, law enforcement, animal control, parks, museums, and services for seniors and veterans with all proceeds placed in the County\u2019s General Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4023, "no_votes": 6080, "total_votes": 10103, "percent_yes": 39.81985548846877, "percent_no": 60.18014451153123, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a 1", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a 1.5% sales tax in Lake County for ten years to generate approximately $4.5 million annually for general county services including roads, libraries, law enforcement, animal control, parks, museums, and services for seniors and veterans. The measure failed with 39.8% voter approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.040627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.520593", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County Measure be adopted to add Article VII to Chapter 18 of the Lake County Code imposing a one and G one-half per cent (1.5%) transactions and use tax (sales tax) for a ten-year period, generating approximately $4.5mil lion annually, for unrestricted general revenue purposes to include roads, libraries, law enforcement, animal control, parks, museums, and services for seniors and veterans with all proceeds placed in the County\u2019s General Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3629, "fingerprint": "2018|201800542|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800542|LAKE", "content_hash": "2280b6a54bc111e3", "measure_id": "201800542", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace outdated portables and construct permanent 21st century learning environments, modernize existing H classrooms, enhance student safety and security, upgrade school grounds, and improve career technical and ag facilities, shall Middletown Unified School District issue$28,000,000 of bonds with an estimated annual average tax levy of $1,623,000 for 35 years and a projected tax rate of 6 cents per$100 of assessed valuation, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money fo administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2162, "no_votes": 1394, "total_votes": 3556, "percent_yes": 60.798650168728905, "percent_no": 39.201349831271095, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Middletown Unified School District to issue $28 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Middletown Unified School District to issue $28 million in bonds to replace portable classrooms, modernize existing classrooms, upgrade school facilities, and improve career technical and agriculture programs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation over 35 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.041244", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.520963", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace outdated portables and construct permanent 21st century learning environments, modernize existing H classrooms, enhance student safety and security, upgrade school grounds, and improve career technical and ag facilities, shall Middletown Unified School District issue$28,000,000 of bonds with an estimated annual average tax levy of $1,623,000 for 35 years and a projected tax rate of 6 cents per$100 of assessed valuation, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money fo administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3630, "fingerprint": "2018|201800543|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800543|LAKE", "content_hash": "b80c2ee6e6e3738d", "measure_id": "201800543", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct and modernize class rooms, upgrade career technology education, enhance safety/security, provide 21st I century learning environments at Upper Lake High School, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the measure of Upper Lake Unified School District be adopted authorizing $10,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, averaging$527,000 raised annually to repay bonds through maturity from levies of approximately three cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens oversight and audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1626, "no_votes": 841, "total_votes": 2467, "percent_yes": 65.91001216051885, "percent_no": 34.089987839481154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Upper Lake Unified School District to issue $10 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Upper Lake Unified School District to issue $10 million in bonds to construct and modernize classrooms, upgrade career technology education, and enhance safety and security at Upper Lake High School. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately three cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising an average of $527,000 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.041525", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.521146", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct and modernize class rooms, upgrade career technology education, enhance safety/security, provide 21st I century learning environments at Upper Lake High School, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the measure of Upper Lake Unified School District be adopted authorizing $10,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, averaging$527,000 raised annually to repay bonds through maturity from levies of approximately three cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens oversight and audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3631, "fingerprint": "2018|201800544|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800544|LAKE", "content_hash": "ee7c0d7c45919a92", "measure_id": "201800544", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct, modernize and rehabilitate K-8 class rooms, improve access to modern technology, install shade J structures, improve play areas, enhance safety/security, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the measure of Upper Lake Unified School District SFID #1 be adopted authorizing $12,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, averaging $665,000 raised annually to repay bonds through maturity from levies of approximately six cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens oversight and audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 987, "no_votes": 547, "total_votes": 1534, "percent_yes": 64.34159061277705, "percent_no": 35.658409387222946, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Upper Lake Unified School District to issue $12 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Upper Lake Unified School District to issue $12 million in bonds to construct, modernize and rehabilitate K-8 classrooms, improve technology access, install shade structures, improve play areas, and enhance safety and security. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately six cents per $100 of assessed valuation, raising an average of $665,000 annually until maturity.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.041827", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.521326", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, modernize and rehabilitate K-8 class rooms, improve access to modern technology, install shade J structures, improve play areas, enhance safety/security, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the measure of Upper Lake Unified School District SFID #1 be adopted authorizing $12,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, averaging $665,000 raised annually to repay bonds through maturity from levies of approximately six cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens oversight and audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3628, "fingerprint": "2018|201800034|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800034|LAKE", "content_hash": "9ba8ac5f83fb3b3c", "measure_id": "201800034", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article VII be added to Chapter 18 of the Lake County Code imposing a Cannabis Business Tax in the unincorporated areas of the County, which, as of January 1, 2021, will impose an annual tax of $1.00 per square foot for nursery cultivation, 4% of gross receipts on a cannabis dispensary, micro-business, or delivery business, and 2.5% of gross receipts on a cannabis manufacturing, processing, transportation, distribution or other type of cannabis business?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10471, "no_votes": 4805, "total_votes": 15276, "percent_yes": 68.5454307410317, "percent_no": 31.454569258968306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure added a cannabis business tax to Lake County's unincorporated ar...", "summary_text": "This measure added a cannabis business tax to Lake County's unincorporated areas, imposing an annual tax of $1.00 per square foot for nursery cultivation, 4% of gross receipts on dispensaries and micro-businesses, and 2.5% of gross receipts on manufacturing and other cannabis operations starting January 1, 2021.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.040897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.520783", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article VII be added to Chapter 18 of the Lake County Code imposing a Cannabis Business Tax in the unincorporated areas of the County, which, as of January 1, 2021, will impose an annual tax of $1.00 per square foot for nursery cultivation, 4% of gross receipts on a cannabis dispensary, micro-business, or delivery business, and 2.5% of gross receipts on a cannabis manufacturing, processing, transportation, distribution or other type of cannabis business?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3633, "fingerprint": "2018|201800036|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800036|LASSEN", "content_hash": "ecb27678ee3d54a9", "measure_id": "201800036", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the County of Lassen to collect a three-quarters of one percent sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for unrestricted general revenue purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1734, "no_votes": 4348, "total_votes": 6082, "percent_yes": 28.51035843472542, "percent_no": 71.48964156527458, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized Lassen County to impose a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized Lassen County to impose a 0.75% sales tax to generate unrestricted general revenue for county operations. The tax revenue would not have been designated for specific programs or services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.042441", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.521689", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the County of Lassen to collect a three-quarters of one percent sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for unrestricted general revenue purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3632, "fingerprint": "2018|201800035|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800035|LASSEN", "content_hash": "3f1cfa6f75057961", "measure_id": "201800035", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY)If voters of the County of Lassen approve a three-quarters of one-percent general sales tax increase, should 75% of the revenue obtained from the three-quarter percent sales tax be used exclusively for public safety and added to, not replace, current public safety budget?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3337, "no_votes": 2598, "total_votes": 5935, "percent_yes": 56.22577927548441, "percent_no": 43.77422072451559, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked Lassen County voters whether 75% of revenue from ...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked Lassen County voters whether 75% of revenue from a proposed three-quarters of one percent sales tax increase should be dedicated exclusively to public safety and supplement the existing public safety budget. The measure passed with 56.2% support, indicating voter preference for this funding allocation if the tax increase were to be implemented.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.042093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.521507", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)If voters of the County of Lassen approve a three-quarters of one-percent general sales tax increase, should 75% of the revenue obtained from the three-quarter percent sales tax be used exclusively for public safety and added to, not replace, current public safety budget?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3634, "fingerprint": "2018|201800037|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800037|LASSEN", "content_hash": "c788c8b7aa14ee41", "measure_id": "201800037", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the library special tax of $28.00 per annum currently assessed on each habitable dwelling unit within the incorporated limits of the City of Susanville, be increased to $52.00 per annum, to go into effect for the 2018-19 tax year beginning July 1, 2018, and to be used solely to operate and maintain the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 696, "no_votes": 1225, "total_votes": 1921, "percent_yes": 36.23112961998959, "percent_no": 63.76887038001041, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased the annual library special tax on each habi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased the annual library special tax on each habitable dwelling unit in Susanville from $28 to $52, with the additional revenue used solely for operating and maintaining the library district.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.042716", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.521870", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the library special tax of $28.00 per annum currently assessed on each habitable dwelling unit within the incorporated limits of the City of Susanville, be increased to $52.00 per annum, to go into effect for the 2018-19 tax year beginning July 1, 2018, and to be used solely to operate and maintain the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3635, "fingerprint": "2018|201800038|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800038|LASSEN", "content_hash": "3931a12545660095", "measure_id": "201800038", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a Cannabis Business Tax of up to $3.00 per square foot of canopy space, per year for cultivators, and up to 8% on gross receipts of all other cannabis businesses operating in the unincorporated areas of Lassen County, with funds staying in the County general fund for unrestricted general revenue purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4691, "no_votes": 4183, "total_votes": 8874, "percent_yes": 52.862294343024566, "percent_no": 47.137705656975434, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a cannabis business tax in unincorporated Lassen County ...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a cannabis business tax in unincorporated Lassen County areas, charging cultivators up to $3 per square foot of canopy space annually and other cannabis businesses up to 8% of gross receipts. The tax revenue goes to the county's general fund for unrestricted use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.043057", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.522050", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a Cannabis Business Tax of up to $3.00 per square foot of canopy space, per year for cultivators, and up to 8% on gross receipts of all other cannabis businesses operating in the unincorporated areas of Lassen County, with funds staying in the County general fund for unrestricted general revenue purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11194, "fingerprint": "2018|201800233|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800233|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9a860e0be5512134", "measure_id": "201800233", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City extend the half percent (1/2%) transactions and use tax to continue to preserve funding for essential city services such as SFPD, LAFD and SFPW; street repairs, park beautification, and other public works infrastructure projects; cultural and recreational programs; economic development; staffing recruitment, retention and wages; restoration of the City\u2019s emergency \u201crainy day\u201d fund; and other unrestricted general revenue purposes until voters decide to end it?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3551, "no_votes": 1576, "total_votes": 5127, "percent_yes": 69.26077628242638, "percent_no": 30.739223717573623, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended Los Angeles's existing half-percent sales tax indefinit...", "summary_text": "This measure extended Los Angeles's existing half-percent sales tax indefinitely to fund city services including police, fire department, public works, street repairs, parks, cultural programs, economic development, city staffing, and the emergency reserve fund. The tax would continue until voters decide to end it in a future election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.551831", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.059475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.531603", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City extend the half percent (1/2%) transactions and use tax to continue to preserve funding for essential city services such as SFPD, LAFD and SFPW; street repairs, park beautification, and other public works infrastructure projects; cultural and recreational programs; economic development; staffing recruitment, retention and wages; restoration of the City\u2019s emergency \u201crainy day\u201d fund; and other unrestricted general revenue purposes until voters decide to end it?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11185, "fingerprint": "2018|201800205|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800205|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "968c77014ed679d7", "measure_id": "201800205", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance to simplify the City of Rolling Hills Estates\u2019 existing business license ordinance be adopted, eliminating outdated classifications and updating business license tax rates to either flat rate, or 0.05% - 0.4% of gross receipts (depending on business type) generating approximately $200,000 annually, dedicated to local, unrestricted general revenue purposes, including sheriff\u2019s patrols; 911 response; park/street maintenance; requiring local control of all funds and annual independent audits, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1776, "no_votes": 455, "total_votes": 2231, "percent_yes": 79.6055580457194, "percent_no": 20.394441954280595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would simplify Rolling Hills Estates' business license ordinance ...", "summary_text": "The measure would simplify Rolling Hills Estates' business license ordinance by eliminating outdated classifications and setting tax rates at either flat rates or 0.05%-0.4% of gross receipts depending on business type. It would generate approximately $200,000 annually for general city services including public safety, parks, and street maintenance, with funds subject to local control and annual audits until voters decide to end it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.546562", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.050666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.526307", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance to simplify the City of Rolling Hills Estates\u2019 existing business license ordinance be adopted, eliminating outdated classifications and updating business license tax rates to either flat rate, or 0.05% - 0.4% of gross receipts (depending on business type) generating approximately $200,000 annually, dedicated to local, unrestricted general revenue purposes, including sheriff\u2019s patrols; 911 response; park/street maintenance; requiring local control of all funds and annual independent audits, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11183, "fingerprint": "2018|201800190|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800190|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b4c64c043c295d15", "measure_id": "201800190", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"D\" passes, repealing the Utility Users' Tax and eliminating approximately 24% or $2.6 million of the City's General Fund Revenues, should the City Council eliminate paramedic services, reduce and outsource police services and library services, reduce code enforcement, and fire suppression services, in addition to other reductions which will be required to balance the budget?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 362, "no_votes": 1999, "total_votes": 2361, "percent_yes": 15.33248623464633, "percent_no": 84.66751376535368, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the city should eliminate paramedi...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the city should eliminate paramedic services, reduce and outsource police and library services, and cut other city services if Measure D passed and repealed the Utility Users' Tax, which would have eliminated approximately $2.6 million in general fund revenue.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.543767", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.045656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.523523", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"D\" passes, repealing the Utility Users' Tax and eliminating approximately 24% or $2.6 million of the City's General Fund Revenues, should the City Council eliminate paramedic services, reduce and outsource police services and library services, reduce code enforcement, and fire suppression services, in addition to other reductions which will be required to balance the budget?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3640, "fingerprint": "2018|201800187|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800187|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a40127462f49f75f", "measure_id": "201800187", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Culver City adopt a measure funding fire/paramedic/police protection, road repairs, youth programs, parks/recreation and other general municipal services by taxing commercial marijuana cultivation at $12.00/square foot and gross receipts of marijuana businesses not exceeding: 6% manufacturing/distribution; 8% medical retail; 10% adult use retail; and 1.5% testing; raising approximately $1,200,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits and compliance with laws protecting public health, safety and community standards?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5724, "no_votes": 1015, "total_votes": 6739, "percent_yes": 84.93841816293218, "percent_no": 15.06158183706782, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established taxes on commercial marijuana businesses in Culver C...", "summary_text": "This measure established taxes on commercial marijuana businesses in Culver City, with rates ranging from 1.5% to 10% on gross receipts depending on business type, plus $12 per square foot for cultivation operations. The measure was projected to generate approximately $1.2 million annually for general municipal services including public safety, infrastructure, and parks.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.044689", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.522977", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Culver City adopt a measure funding fire/paramedic/police protection, road repairs, youth programs, parks/recreation and other general municipal services by taxing commercial marijuana cultivation at $12.00/square foot and gross receipts of marijuana businesses not exceeding: 6% manufacturing/distribution; 8% medical retail; 10% adult use retail; and 1.5% testing; raising approximately $1,200,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits and compliance with laws protecting public health, safety and community standards?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3651, "fingerprint": "2018|201800201|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800201|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8cb1b0c63a053b4f", "measure_id": "201800201", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter be amended consistent with state law to: 1) change the City\u2019s primary and general election dates to coincide with statewide primary and general election dates, beginning with the November 2018 general election; 2) extend the current terms for the Mayor and Councilmembers by 19 months on a one-time basis in order to transition to the statewide election cycle; and 3) move the Mayor\u2019s thematic budget message to February?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21470, "no_votes": 4394, "total_votes": 25864, "percent_yes": 83.01113516857409, "percent_no": 16.988864831425914, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment changed Pasadena's municipal election dates to align w...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment changed Pasadena's municipal election dates to align with statewide primary and general elections starting in November 2018, extended current terms for the Mayor and City Council by 19 months to facilitate the transition, and moved the Mayor's budget message to February.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.049443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.525562", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter be amended consistent with state law to: 1) change the City\u2019s primary and general election dates to coincide with statewide primary and general election dates, beginning with the November 2018 general election; 2) extend the current terms for the Mayor and Councilmembers by 19 months on a one-time basis in order to transition to the statewide election cycle; and 3) move the Mayor\u2019s thematic budget message to February?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3663, "fingerprint": "2018|201800220|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800220|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "822050696237aa9c", "measure_id": "201800220", "measure_letter": "AAA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to authorize the City Auditor to conduct performance audits, defined as financial, compliance, efficiency, economy, operational, or program audits or studies, of any City department, board or commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92517, "no_votes": 37752, "total_votes": 130269, "percent_yes": 71.0199663772655, "percent_no": 28.980033622734496, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment authorized the City Auditor of Los Angeles to conduct ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment authorized the City Auditor of Los Angeles to conduct performance audits of any city department, board, or commission, including financial, compliance, efficiency, economy, operational, or program audits or studies.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.055559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.529090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to authorize the City Auditor to conduct performance audits, defined as financial, compliance, efficiency, economy, operational, or program audits or studies, of any City department, board or commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3685, "fingerprint": "2018|201800555|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800555|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2c092d877c5ade01", "measure_id": "201800555", "measure_letter": "AE", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, labs, career training facilities to prepare students for college/careers in math, science, technology, engineering, skilled trades/arts; improve school safety; acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment; repair roofs, plumbing/electrical systems; shall Baldwin Park Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $69,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 6 cents/$100 assessed value, averaging $4,200,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, all money locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10395, "no_votes": 2782, "total_votes": 13177, "percent_yes": 78.8874554147378, "percent_no": 21.1125445852622, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Baldwin Park Unified School District to issue $69 mil...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Baldwin Park Unified School District to issue $69 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, labs, career training facilities, and improve school safety through construction, repairs, and equipment purchases. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $4.2 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.065333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.535252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, labs, career training facilities to prepare students for college/careers in math, science, technology, engineering, skilled trades/arts; improve school safety; acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment; repair roofs, plumbing/electrical systems; shall Baldwin Park Unified School District\u2019s measure authorizing $69,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 6 cents/$100 assessed value, averaging $4,200,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, all money locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3668, "fingerprint": "2018|201800225|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800225|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cd8b0e060192f60c", "measure_id": "201800225", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to allow the City to establish a municipal financial institution or bank?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 430488, "no_votes": 544498, "total_votes": 974986, "percent_yes": 44.1532493799911, "percent_no": 55.8467506200089, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment would have allowed Los Angeles to establish a city-own...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment would have allowed Los Angeles to establish a city-owned bank or financial institution. The measure failed with 44.2% support in 2018.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.056998", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.529997", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to allow the City to establish a municipal financial institution or bank?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11200, "fingerprint": "2018|201800553|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800553|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5f4eb4f1b27e8ca2", "measure_id": "201800553", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety/campus security/intruder-protection systems, construct and upgrade classrooms, science labs, and school facilities that support college readiness and career training in math, science, engineering, technology, arts, and skilled trades, and keep instructional technology up-to-date, shall ABC Unified School District issue $258,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 5 cents/$100 assessed value for 29 years ($15,500,000) to improve our schools, with citizen oversight, independent audits and all money locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18021, "no_votes": 12863, "total_votes": 30884, "percent_yes": 58.3506022535941, "percent_no": 41.6493977464059, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the ABC Unified School District to issue $258 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the ABC Unified School District to issue $258 million in bonds to construct and upgrade classrooms, science labs, and school facilities, improve campus security systems, and update instructional technology. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 5 cents per $100 of assessed value for 29 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.554818", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.064699", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.534851", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety/campus security/intruder-protection systems, construct and upgrade classrooms, science labs, and school facilities that support college readiness and career training in math, science, engineering, technology, arts, and skilled trades, and keep instructional technology up-to-date, shall ABC Unified School District issue $258,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 5 cents/$100 assessed value for 29 years ($15,500,000) to improve our schools, with citizen oversight, independent audits and all money locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3652, "fingerprint": "2018|201800202|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800202|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "14d2aeba81d1df0f", "measure_id": "201800202", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter be amended consistent with state law to: 1) change the Pasadena Unified School District's election dates to coincide with statewide general election dates, utilizing the plurality voting format, beginning with the November 2020 general election; 2) extend the current terms of Board Members by 19 months on a onetime basis in order to transition to the statewide election cycle; and 3) change the timing of the Board President's annual address to May?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34549, "no_votes": 6064, "total_votes": 40613, "percent_yes": 85.06882032846626, "percent_no": 14.93117967153374, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Pasadena City Charter to move Pasadena Unified Schoo...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Pasadena City Charter to move Pasadena Unified School District elections to coincide with statewide general elections starting in November 2020, using plurality voting. It also extended current board members' terms by 19 months to facilitate the transition and changed the timing of the Board President's annual address to May.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.049748", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.525752", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter be amended consistent with state law to: 1) change the Pasadena Unified School District's election dates to coincide with statewide general election dates, utilizing the plurality voting format, beginning with the November 2020 general election; 2) extend the current terms of Board Members by 19 months on a onetime basis in order to transition to the statewide election cycle; and 3) change the timing of the Board President's annual address to May?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3664, "fingerprint": "2018|201800221|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800221|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d61efe5cfcc00a53", "measure_id": "201800221", "measure_letter": "BBB", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to limit the Mayor and City Councilmembers to serving three terms and to prohibit individuals who have already served three terms from being elected as write-in candidates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75833, "no_votes": 57627, "total_votes": 133460, "percent_yes": 56.82077026824517, "percent_no": 43.17922973175483, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to impose a three-term limi...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to impose a three-term limit on the Mayor and City Councilmembers and prohibit those who have served three terms from running as write-in candidates.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.055824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.529270", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to limit the Mayor and City Councilmembers to serving three terms and to prohibit individuals who have already served three terms from being elected as write-in candidates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3679, "fingerprint": "2018|201800546|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800546|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ce4173abf5b51596", "measure_id": "201800546", "measure_letter": "BH", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve aging Beverly Hills schools, upgrade/replace inefficient heating, cooling/electrical systems, classrooms, libraries/science labs, deteriorating restrooms/leaky roofs, provide modern classroom technology/science equipment, shall this Beverly Hills Unified School District measure be adopted to upgrade, construct/acquire classrooms, facilities,  sites/equipment, and issue $385,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy on average 4.4 cents/$100 assessed value, $23,700,000 annually for school repairs while bonds are outstanding, require taxpayer oversight, annual audits/all funds for Beverly Hills schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3630, "no_votes": 2344, "total_votes": 5974, "percent_yes": 60.763307666555065, "percent_no": 39.236692333444935, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Beverly Hills Unified School District to issue $3...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Beverly Hills Unified School District to issue $385 million in bonds to upgrade and replace aging school facilities, heating and cooling systems, classrooms, libraries, science labs, and technology equipment. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy averaging 4.4 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $23.7 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.062332", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.533465", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve aging Beverly Hills schools, upgrade/replace inefficient heating, cooling/electrical systems, classrooms, libraries/science labs, deteriorating restrooms/leaky roofs, provide modern classroom technology/science equipment, shall this Beverly Hills Unified School District measure be adopted to upgrade, construct/acquire classrooms, facilities,  sites/equipment, and issue $385,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy on average 4.4 cents/$100 assessed value, $23,700,000 annually for school repairs while bonds are outstanding, require taxpayer oversight, annual audits/all funds for Beverly Hills schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11189, "fingerprint": "2018|201800213|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800213|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3cbe857042bcdcfb", "measure_id": "201800213", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to maintain 911 emergency response times by retaining firefighters, police officers, paramedics; fully staff neighborhood fire stations; fix potholes/streets; maintain senior services, after school programs, parks and other general fund City services, by increasing Culver City\u2019s sales tax one-quarter cent until ended by voters with no rate increase, generating approximately $4,900,000 annually requiring independent annual audits, and all funds used locally be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12846, "no_votes": 5315, "total_votes": 18161, "percent_yes": 70.7339904190298, "percent_no": 29.266009580970206, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Culver City's sales tax by 0", "summary_text": "This measure increased Culver City's sales tax by 0.25% to generate approximately $4.9 million annually for city services including emergency response, infrastructure maintenance, and community programs. The tax increase continues until ended by voters and requires independent annual audits with all funds used locally.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.548052", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.053423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.527783", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to maintain 911 emergency response times by retaining firefighters, police officers, paramedics; fully staff neighborhood fire stations; fix potholes/streets; maintain senior services, after school programs, parks and other general fund City services, by increasing Culver City\u2019s sales tax one-quarter cent until ended by voters with no rate increase, generating approximately $4,900,000 annually requiring independent annual audits, and all funds used locally be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11182, "fingerprint": "2018|201800188|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800188|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3217694085d2784a", "measure_id": "201800188", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure authorizing a three-quarter cent transactions and use tax (sales tax), which shall be imposed by the city when a county sales tax measure has qualified for a ballot and may continue to be imposed only if it receives voter approval, to fund general municipal services, for example, police and fire services senior citizen services, recreation services and street maintenance be adopted (generates approximately $9 million annually in perpetuity) ?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2872, "no_votes": 508, "total_votes": 3380, "percent_yes": 84.97041420118343, "percent_no": 15.02958579881657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This Los Angeles ballot measure authorized a 0", "summary_text": "This Los Angeles ballot measure authorized a 0.75% sales tax to fund general municipal services such as police, fire, senior citizen services, recreation, and street maintenance, generating approximately $9 million annually. The tax can only be imposed when a county sales tax measure qualifies for the ballot and requires voter approval to continue.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.543389", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.044960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.523157", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure authorizing a three-quarter cent transactions and use tax (sales tax), which shall be imposed by the city when a county sales tax measure has qualified for a ballot and may continue to be imposed only if it receives voter approval, to fund general municipal services, for example, police and fire services senior citizen services, recreation services and street maintenance be adopted (generates approximately $9 million annually in perpetuity) ?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3637, "fingerprint": "2018|201800184|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800184|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "96ef0ba39961b8bb", "measure_id": "201800184", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a ballot measure be approved permitting commercial cannabis activity (except outdoor cultivation and indoor cultivation for other than personal use) only in the commercial manufacturing zones of the City in conflict with any other ballot measure of the same subject?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 698, "no_votes": 2244, "total_votes": 2942, "percent_yes": 23.72535690006798, "percent_no": 76.27464309993202, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have restricted commercial cannabis activities (exc...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have restricted commercial cannabis activities (excluding outdoor cultivation and non-personal indoor cultivation) to only commercial manufacturing zones within the city. The measure included a provision that it would override any conflicting ballot measure on the same topic.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-01-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.043616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.522425", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a ballot measure be approved permitting commercial cannabis activity (except outdoor cultivation and indoor cultivation for other than personal use) only in the commercial manufacturing zones of the City in conflict with any other ballot measure of the same subject?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3656, "fingerprint": "2018|201800208|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800208|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "989b13264cd4f091", "measure_id": "201800208", "measure_letter": "CA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, to adopt a CITY CHARTER to provide the People of Carson with greater local control, through provisions such as: limiting council authority to levy taxes, prohibiting favoritism and nepotism, banning marijuana dispensaries, regulations for redevelopment of contaminated sites, promoting economic development, regulating impacts of truck intensive business, prohibiting conflicts of interest or financial interests in City contracts, modifying methodology of compensation for council, imposing term limits on city council members, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15390, "no_votes": 11759, "total_votes": 27149, "percent_yes": 56.68717079818778, "percent_no": 43.31282920181222, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would adopt a city charter for Carson that includes provisions s...", "summary_text": "This measure would adopt a city charter for Carson that includes provisions such as limiting the city council's tax authority, banning marijuana dispensaries, imposing term limits on council members, prohibiting nepotism and conflicts of interest, and establishing regulations for contaminated site redevelopment and truck-intensive businesses. The charter would also modify how city council compensation is determined and include measures to promote economic development.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.051635", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.526865", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, to adopt a CITY CHARTER to provide the People of Carson with greater local control, through provisions such as: limiting council authority to levy taxes, prohibiting favoritism and nepotism, banning marijuana dispensaries, regulations for redevelopment of contaminated sites, promoting economic development, regulating impacts of truck intensive business, prohibiting conflicts of interest or financial interests in City contracts, modifying methodology of compensation for council, imposing term limits on city council members, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11187, "fingerprint": "2018|201800209|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800209|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4c8fc77861dd5423", "measure_id": "201800209", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain current service levels including 911 emergency response, public safety, fire protection, paramedics, community policing, school safety officers, fix potholes/streets, community after school/senior/recreation programs, library services, homeless and other general City services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing Covina\u2019s sales tax by three-quarters of a percent generating approximately $5,100,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, public disclosure, funds used only in Covina?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8247, "no_votes": 5745, "total_votes": 13992, "percent_yes": 58.940823327615774, "percent_no": 41.059176672384226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Covina's sales tax by 0", "summary_text": "This measure increased Covina's sales tax by 0.75% to generate approximately $5.1 million annually for general city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and community programs. The tax continues until ended by voters and requires audits and public disclosure of funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.547307", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.052080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.527047", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain current service levels including 911 emergency response, public safety, fire protection, paramedics, community policing, school safety officers, fix potholes/streets, community after school/senior/recreation programs, library services, homeless and other general City services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing Covina\u2019s sales tax by three-quarters of a percent generating approximately $5,100,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, public disclosure, funds used only in Covina?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3653, "fingerprint": "2018|201800203|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800203|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dc8c18d4b9a9683c", "measure_id": "201800203", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to allow a limited number of commercial cannabis businesses to operate in Pasadena, subject to business, health and land use regulations, and to repeal the City of Pasadena\u2019s current ban on commercial cannabis businesses, provided that: (1) the ordinance shall not take effect unless voters approve a Cannabis Business Tax, and (2) the City Council retains authority to amend existing ordinances and adopt future ordinances regarding commercial cannabis business activities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16099, "no_votes": 10370, "total_votes": 26469, "percent_yes": 60.82209377007065, "percent_no": 39.17790622992935, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would allow a limited number of commercial cannabis businesses...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would allow a limited number of commercial cannabis businesses to operate in Pasadena under regulatory requirements, repealing the city's existing ban on such businesses. The ordinance would only take effect if voters also approve a cannabis business tax, and the City Council would retain authority to modify cannabis business regulations.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.050048", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.525938", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to allow a limited number of commercial cannabis businesses to operate in Pasadena, subject to business, health and land use regulations, and to repeal the City of Pasadena\u2019s current ban on commercial cannabis businesses, provided that: (1) the ordinance shall not take effect unless voters approve a Cannabis Business Tax, and (2) the City Council retains authority to amend existing ordinances and adopt future ordinances regarding commercial cannabis business activities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3665, "fingerprint": "2018|201800222|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800222|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1abc64055156bf2a", "measure_id": "201800222", "measure_letter": "CCC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to create an ethics commission of Long Beach residents for the purpose of monitoring, administering and implementing governmental ethics in the City of Long Beach?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 81462, "no_votes": 50381, "total_votes": 131843, "percent_yes": 61.78712559635324, "percent_no": 38.21287440364676, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Long Beach City Charter to establish an ethics commi...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Long Beach City Charter to establish an ethics commission composed of city residents to monitor, administer, and implement governmental ethics standards. The commission would oversee ethical conduct and compliance within Long Beach city government.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.056110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.529452", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to create an ethics commission of Long Beach residents for the purpose of monitoring, administering and implementing governmental ethics in the City of Long Beach?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3684, "fingerprint": "2018|201800554|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800554|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "76fbe15b6b06ede5", "measure_id": "201800554", "measure_letter": "CK", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve student overcrowding and improve the education environment; renovate and/or modernize Acton, Agua-Dulce, Meadowlark and High Desert; finish Vasquez construction projects; provide 21st century learning technology; and to strengthen campus security, shall the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District issue $7,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, repayment averaging $523,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, at a rate of approximately $14.70 per $100,000 of assessed value, with annual audits plus independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2103, "no_votes": 2903, "total_votes": 5006, "percent_yes": 42.00958849380744, "percent_no": 57.99041150619256, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School Distric...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District to issue $7.5 million in bonds to renovate and modernize school facilities, complete construction projects, upgrade technology, and improve campus security. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at a rate of approximately $14.70 per $100,000 of assessed property value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.065019", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.535049", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve student overcrowding and improve the education environment; renovate and/or modernize Acton, Agua-Dulce, Meadowlark and High Desert; finish Vasquez construction projects; provide 21st century learning technology; and to strengthen campus security, shall the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District issue $7,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, repayment averaging $523,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, at a rate of approximately $14.70 per $100,000 of assessed value, with annual audits plus independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3657, "fingerprint": "2018|201800210|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800210|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "304b9da4891a67f4", "measure_id": "201800210", "measure_letter": "CS", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide dedicated funding for public safety services (including police services, code and parking enforcement), shall the City establish a parcel tax subject to citizen oversight that expires in 10 years on land parcels at a rate of $343/year per parcel for single family residential parcels; $556/year per dwelling unit for multifamily parcels; and between $3,500 to $112,000/year per parcel for other parcels to raise approximately $5,000,000 per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1295, "no_votes": 1914, "total_votes": 3209, "percent_yes": 40.35525085696478, "percent_no": 59.64474914303522, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a 10-year parcel tax in Los Angeles to fu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a 10-year parcel tax in Los Angeles to fund public safety services, charging $343 annually for single-family homes, $556 per unit for multifamily properties, and $3,500 to $112,000 for other parcels to raise approximately $5 million per year. The measure failed with 40.4% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.052486", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.527238", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide dedicated funding for public safety services (including police services, code and parking enforcement), shall the City establish a parcel tax subject to citizen oversight that expires in 10 years on land parcels at a rate of $343/year per parcel for single family residential parcels; $556/year per dwelling unit for multifamily parcels; and between $3,500 to $112,000/year per parcel for other parcels to raise approximately $5,000,000 per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3670, "fingerprint": "2018|201800228|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800228|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e82bcb9241ee61fa", "measure_id": "201800228", "measure_letter": "CT", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads, and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at an annual rate not to exceed 10% of gross receipts for all commercial cannabis activities conducted in the City which is expected to generate an estimated $1.2 million to $1.6 million annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3103, "no_votes": 1314, "total_votes": 4417, "percent_yes": 70.25130178854427, "percent_no": 29.748698211455732, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Los Angeles to impose an annual tax of up to 10% of g...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Los Angeles to impose an annual tax of up to 10% of gross receipts on cannabis businesses operating in the city. The tax revenue would fund general municipal services including police, fire, roads, and recreation, with an estimated annual collection of $1.2 million to $1.6 million.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.057834", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.530551", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads, and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at an annual rate not to exceed 10% of gross receipts for all commercial cannabis activities conducted in the City which is expected to generate an estimated $1.2 million to $1.6 million annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11190, "fingerprint": "2018|201800214|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800214|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bbedf3dd11c13e41", "measure_id": "201800214", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending Sections 606 and 1500 of the Culver City Charter to change the date of the City\u2019s General Municipal Election for City Council Members from April of even-numbered years to the date of the statewide general election, currently held in November of even-numbered years, effective in 2020, in accordance with the California Voter Participation Rights Act, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14192, "no_votes": 2874, "total_votes": 17066, "percent_yes": 83.15949841790695, "percent_no": 16.840501582093054, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Culver City Charter to move the city's general munic...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Culver City Charter to move the city's general municipal elections for City Council from April to November of even-numbered years, aligning them with statewide general elections. The change took effect in 2020 to comply with the California Voter Participation Rights Act.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.548237", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.053726", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.527975", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending Sections 606 and 1500 of the Culver City Charter to change the date of the City\u2019s General Municipal Election for City Council Members from April of even-numbered years to the date of the statewide general election, currently held in November of even-numbered years, effective in 2020, in accordance with the California Voter Participation Rights Act, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3642, "fingerprint": "2018|201800191|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800191|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4da58baaafdb8ce0", "measure_id": "201800191", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Sierra Madre adopt a measure repealing the City's Utility Users Tax in its entirety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 481, "no_votes": 2157, "total_votes": 2638, "percent_yes": 18.23351023502653, "percent_no": 81.76648976497347, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have repealed Sierra Madre's Utility Users Tax completely, ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have repealed Sierra Madre's Utility Users Tax completely, eliminating the city's tax on utility services such as electricity, gas, water, and telecommunications. The repeal failed with only 18.2% of voters supporting the elimination of this municipal revenue source.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.045988", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.523704", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Sierra Madre adopt a measure repealing the City's Utility Users Tax in its entirety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3654, "fingerprint": "2018|201800204|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800204|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1a750ab1bf596f27", "measure_id": "201800204", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses, to fund unrestricted general revenue purposes such as police, fire, roads and recreation; which is expected to generate an estimated $1.4 to $2.1 million annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19699, "no_votes": 6237, "total_votes": 25936, "percent_yes": 75.95234423195558, "percent_no": 24.04765576804442, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Los Angeles to impose taxes on cannabis businesses at...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Los Angeles to impose taxes on cannabis businesses at rates up to $10 per square foot for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis operations. The tax revenue would go to the city's general fund for services like police, fire, roads, and recreation, with an estimated annual generation of $1.4 to $2.1 million.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.050364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.526126", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses, to fund unrestricted general revenue purposes such as police, fire, roads and recreation; which is expected to generate an estimated $1.4 to $2.1 million annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3666, "fingerprint": "2018|201800223|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800223|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a5453e5991824ed1", "measure_id": "201800223", "measure_letter": "DDD", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to create an independent citizens commission of Long Beach residents to determine the boundaries of City Council districts every ten years after the national census?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75851, "no_votes": 51925, "total_votes": 127776, "percent_yes": 59.36247808665164, "percent_no": 40.63752191334836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment creates an independent citizens commission composed of...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment creates an independent citizens commission composed of Long Beach residents to redraw City Council district boundaries every ten years following the national census. The commission would take over the redistricting process that was previously handled by city officials.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.056394", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.529633", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to create an independent citizens commission of Long Beach residents to determine the boundaries of City Council districts every ten years after the national census?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11192, "fingerprint": "2018|201800226|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800226|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3b322d41cd7b3a47", "measure_id": "201800226", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to realign the City\u2019s primary election date with the State\u2019s primary election held in March of even-numbered years, and make other related and technical changes to City election procedures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 703563, "no_votes": 271911, "total_votes": 975474, "percent_yes": 72.1252437276647, "percent_no": 27.874756272335304, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to move the city's primary ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to move the city's primary elections from odd-numbered years to March of even-numbered years to align with state primary elections, along with making related technical changes to city election procedures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.550479", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.057267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.530181", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to realign the City\u2019s primary election date with the State\u2019s primary election held in March of even-numbered years, and make other related and technical changes to City election procedures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3641, "fingerprint": "2018|201800189|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800189|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2d8a3b17a33efa38", "measure_id": "201800189", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund the Palos Verdes Estates Police Department, shall an ordinance be adopted approving an annual parcel tax of $342 plus 200 per square foot of building improvements, generating approximately $5 million annually for 9 years and requiring a Citizens Financial Oversight Committee and annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3940, "no_votes": 1770, "total_votes": 5710, "percent_yes": 69.00175131348512, "percent_no": 30.998248686514884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed an annual parcel tax of $342 plus $0", "summary_text": "This measure imposed an annual parcel tax of $342 plus $0.002 per square foot of building improvements in Palos Verdes Estates to fund the local police department for nine years. The tax was expected to generate approximately $5 million annually and required citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.045371", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.523337", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund the Palos Verdes Estates Police Department, shall an ordinance be adopted approving an annual parcel tax of $342 plus 200 per square foot of building improvements, generating approximately $5 million annually for 9 years and requiring a Citizens Financial Oversight Committee and annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3690, "fingerprint": "2018|201800560|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800560|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "34f7dc28c1602407", "measure_id": "201800560", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to realign the LAUSD Board of Education\u2019s primary election date with the State\u2019s primary election held in March of even-numbered years, and make other related and technical changes to LAUSD election procedures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 871699, "no_votes": 281569, "total_votes": 1153268, "percent_yes": 75.58511985071986, "percent_no": 24.414880149280137, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure realigned the Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Educa...", "summary_text": "This measure realigned the Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education primary elections to occur in March of even-numbered years to match the state's primary election schedule. It also made related technical changes to LAUSD election procedures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.067021", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.536248", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to realign the LAUSD Board of Education\u2019s primary election date with the State\u2019s primary election held in March of even-numbered years, and make other related and technical changes to LAUSD election procedures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3689, "fingerprint": "2018|201800559|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800559|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8f635675c3112de5", "measure_id": "201800559", "measure_letter": "ES", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, libraries, career training facilities and instructional technology to support student achievement in science, technology, engineering, arts and math, improve student safety, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, repair roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, shall this El Segundo Unified School District measure authorizing $92,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 4.3 cents/$100 assessed value, $5,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4899, "no_votes": 2838, "total_votes": 7737, "percent_yes": 63.31911593640947, "percent_no": 36.68088406359053, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the El Segundo Unified School District to issue $92 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the El Segundo Unified School District to issue $92 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, science labs, libraries, career training facilities, and instructional technology, as well as repair infrastructure like roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 4.3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $5.5 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.066643", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.536052", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, libraries, career training facilities and instructional technology to support student achievement in science, technology, engineering, arts and math, improve student safety, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, repair roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, shall this El Segundo Unified School District measure authorizing $92,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 4.3 cents/$100 assessed value, $5,500,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3660, "fingerprint": "2018|201800216|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800216|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5e24ceb515281d2b", "measure_id": "201800216", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Duarte\u2019s Fireworks Ordinance (set forth in Chapter 15.05 of the Duarte Municipal Code) be amended to prohibit the sale and discharge of all fireworks everywhere in the City at all times unless the fireworks are part of a public display permitted pursuant to Section 15.05.090 of the Duarte Municipal Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3570, "no_votes": 3381, "total_votes": 6951, "percent_yes": 51.3595166163142, "percent_no": 48.6404833836858, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended Duarte's fireworks ordinance to prohibit the sale and dis...", "summary_text": "The measure amended Duarte's fireworks ordinance to prohibit the sale and discharge of all fireworks within the city at all times, except for permitted public displays.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.054336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.528350", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Duarte\u2019s Fireworks Ordinance (set forth in Chapter 15.05 of the Duarte Municipal Code) be amended to prohibit the sale and discharge of all fireworks everywhere in the City at all times unless the fireworks are part of a public display permitted pursuant to Section 15.05.090 of the Duarte Municipal Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3669, "fingerprint": "2018|201800227|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800227|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f97b518c0d8ac572", "measure_id": "201800227", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to (1) allow and regulate cannabis (marijuana) businesses; (2) permit existing medical marijuana dispensaries to sell and deliver recreational (adult use) cannabis; and (3) impose a new general tax of 2.5% of gross receipts from sales of non-medical cannabis, the revenues from which may be used for general city purposes, until repealed by voters, which tax is estimated to raise approximately $75,000-$150,000 annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3616, "no_votes": 1543, "total_votes": 5159, "percent_yes": 70.09110292692382, "percent_no": 29.908897073076176, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed and regulated cannabis businesses in Los Angeles, permit...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed and regulated cannabis businesses in Los Angeles, permitted existing medical marijuana dispensaries to sell recreational cannabis, and imposed a 2.5% gross receipts tax on non-medical cannabis sales for general city purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.057571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.530368", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to (1) allow and regulate cannabis (marijuana) businesses; (2) permit existing medical marijuana dispensaries to sell and deliver recreational (adult use) cannabis; and (3) impose a new general tax of 2.5% of gross receipts from sales of non-medical cannabis, the revenues from which may be used for general city purposes, until repealed by voters, which tax is estimated to raise approximately $75,000-$150,000 annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3691, "fingerprint": "2018|201800563|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800563|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f1aef05c971567d3", "measure_id": "201800563", "measure_letter": "GO", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade job training/college transfer/vocational classrooms, science, computer/technology labs, improve student safety, veterans\u2019 career resources, access for disabled students; remove asbestos, replace deteriorating roofs, gas, electrical/sewer lines; acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment; shall Mt. San Antonio Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $750,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying 2.5 cents/$100 assessed valuation, $37,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring annual audits/citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121406, "no_votes": 73048, "total_votes": 194454, "percent_yes": 62.43430322852706, "percent_no": 37.56569677147294, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Mt", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Mt. San Antonio Community College District to issue $750 million in bonds to upgrade classrooms, labs, and facilities, improve student safety and accessibility, and address infrastructure needs like asbestos removal and utility replacements. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $37 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.070468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.536846", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade job training/college transfer/vocational classrooms, science, computer/technology labs, improve student safety, veterans\u2019 career resources, access for disabled students; remove asbestos, replace deteriorating roofs, gas, electrical/sewer lines; acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment; shall Mt. San Antonio Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $750,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying 2.5 cents/$100 assessed valuation, $37,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring annual audits/citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3688, "fingerprint": "2018|201800558|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800558|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "25badc5a9bcff1f3", "measure_id": "201800558", "measure_letter": "HS", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade all neighborhood high schools, attract quality teachers by improving school security, emergency communications/fire safety, classrooms, science, engineering/computer labs; repairing leaky roofs; providing safe drinking water; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, shall El Monte Union High School District\u2019s measure authorizing $190,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value, $9,700,000 annually for local high schools while bonds are outstanding, be approved, requiring independent audits/citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20006, "no_votes": 6993, "total_votes": 26999, "percent_yes": 74.09904070521131, "percent_no": 25.90095929478869, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the El Monte Union High School District to issue $190...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the El Monte Union High School District to issue $190 million in bonds to upgrade facilities, improve safety systems, repair infrastructure, and construct new educational spaces at local high schools. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating approximately $9.7 million annually while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.066325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.535852", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade all neighborhood high schools, attract quality teachers by improving school security, emergency communications/fire safety, classrooms, science, engineering/computer labs; repairing leaky roofs; providing safe drinking water; acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, shall El Monte Union High School District\u2019s measure authorizing $190,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value, $9,700,000 annually for local high schools while bonds are outstanding, be approved, requiring independent audits/citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3680, "fingerprint": "2018|201800548|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800548|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fbbab19f5a15910e", "measure_id": "201800548", "measure_letter": "HSD", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging classrooms, ensure student health, safety and achievement and keep pace with technology, upgrade aging plumbing, electrical, lighting, heating/ventilation, safety/security systems, shall this Hawthorne School District measure be adopted to repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites/equipment, and issue $59,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levy on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($3,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, require independent audits/oversight, and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4076, "no_votes": 1422, "total_votes": 5498, "percent_yes": 74.13604947253548, "percent_no": 25.863950527464524, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Hawthorne School District to issue $59 million in...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Hawthorne School District to issue $59 million in bonds to repair and upgrade aging school facilities, including classrooms, plumbing, electrical systems, and safety equipment. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies averaging 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.063058", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.533859", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging classrooms, ensure student health, safety and achievement and keep pace with technology, upgrade aging plumbing, electrical, lighting, heating/ventilation, safety/security systems, shall this Hawthorne School District measure be adopted to repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites/equipment, and issue $59,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levy on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($3,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, require independent audits/oversight, and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11193, "fingerprint": "2018|201800230|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800230|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8ccdaaafe133b679", "measure_id": "201800230", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to maintain essential City of Pasadena services such as fire, police, paramedics, emergency service/response times; keep fire stations open; improve neighborhood and school safety; repair streets/sidewalks; address homelessness; maintain after-school programs/senior services, and other general fund services, by establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $21,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits and all funds locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35015, "no_votes": 15924, "total_votes": 50939, "percent_yes": 68.73908007616953, "percent_no": 31.26091992383047, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75-cent sales tax in Pasadena to fund city services including fire, police, paramedics, street repairs, homelessness programs, and after-school and senior services, generating approximately $21 million annually. The tax remains in effect until ended by voters and requires audits with all funds controlled locally.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.551232", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.058494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.530920", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to maintain essential City of Pasadena services such as fire, police, paramedics, emergency service/response times; keep fire stations open; improve neighborhood and school safety; repair streets/sidewalks; address homelessness; maintain after-school programs/senior services, and other general fund services, by establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $21,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits and all funds locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3638, "fingerprint": "2018|201800185|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800185|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "affd0d0c9a4baece", "measure_id": "201800185", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted by voter initiative to allow commercial cannabis businesses to operate in the City\u2019s Limited commercial, and Commercial Manufacturing Zones, including retail dispensaries, research and development and delivery businesses, with a business license tax not to exceed 5% percent of gross receipts and $10/per square foot of canopy on cannabis for indoor cultivation facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 698, "no_votes": 2198, "total_votes": 2896, "percent_yes": 24.10220994475138, "percent_no": 75.89779005524862, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed commercial cannabis businesses including reta...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed commercial cannabis businesses including retail dispensaries, research and development, and delivery services to operate in specific commercial zones in Los Angeles, while imposing a business license tax of up to 5% of gross receipts and $10 per square foot of canopy for indoor cultivation facilities.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-01-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.043894", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.522608", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted by voter initiative to allow commercial cannabis businesses to operate in the City\u2019s Limited commercial, and Commercial Manufacturing Zones, including retail dispensaries, research and development and delivery businesses, with a business license tax not to exceed 5% percent of gross receipts and $10/per square foot of canopy on cannabis for indoor cultivation facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3681, "fingerprint": "2018|201800549|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800549|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a59d1f0d31814ebb", "measure_id": "201800549", "measure_letter": "ID", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to: (1) change the City's General Municipal Election date for all elective offices to a Statewide Election date commencing in 2020; (2) extend the terms of office of all affected officials one-time and by one year to transition to the new election date; and (3) change the runoff election date to an established election date?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10957, "no_votes": 3698, "total_votes": 14655, "percent_yes": 74.76629136813374, "percent_no": 25.233708631866264, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Inglewood City Charter to move municipal elections t...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Inglewood City Charter to move municipal elections to align with statewide election dates starting in 2020, extended current officials' terms by one year for the transition, and changed runoff elections to established election dates.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.063343", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.534051", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to: (1) change the City's General Municipal Election date for all elective offices to a Statewide Election date commencing in 2020; (2) extend the terms of office of all affected officials one-time and by one year to transition to the new election date; and (3) change the runoff election date to an established election date?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3671, "fingerprint": "2018|201800229|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800229|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "66c1347cc060e9c9", "measure_id": "201800229", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Pasadena voters approve a local sales tax measure, should the City use 2/3rds of the measure\u2019s annual revenue to maintain essential City of Pasadena services such as fire, police, paramedics, emergency service/response times; keep fire stations open; improve neighborhood and school safety; repair streets/sidewalks; address homelessness; maintain after-school programs/senior services; with the remaining 1/3rd of the measure\u2019s revenue going to support Pasadena public schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36179, "no_votes": 14036, "total_votes": 50215, "percent_yes": 72.04819277108435, "percent_no": 27.951807228915655, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the City of Pasadena should alloca...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the City of Pasadena should allocate two-thirds of revenue from a potential local sales tax to maintain city services like fire, police, emergency response, street repairs, and homelessness programs, with the remaining one-third going to support public schools.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.058188", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.530732", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Pasadena voters approve a local sales tax measure, should the City use 2/3rds of the measure\u2019s annual revenue to maintain essential City of Pasadena services such as fire, police, paramedics, emergency service/response times; keep fire stations open; improve neighborhood and school safety; repair streets/sidewalks; address homelessness; maintain after-school programs/senior services; with the remaining 1/3rd of the measure\u2019s revenue going to support Pasadena public schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3687, "fingerprint": "2018|201800557|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800557|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f6333491f69bffd1", "measure_id": "201800557", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve excellence in core academic programs with locally controlled funds that cannot be taken by the State, attract and retain qualified teachers, maintain smaller class sizes, support math, science, engineering, technology, art and music programs, improve support for students with special needs, and prepare students for college and modern careers, shall Culver City Unified School District levy an education parcel tax of $189 for seven years, raise approximately $2,362,500 annually, with an exemption for seniors, and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13750, "no_votes": 4490, "total_votes": 18240, "percent_yes": 75.38377192982456, "percent_no": 24.61622807017544, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the Culver City Unified School District to lev...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the Culver City Unified School District to levy a $189 annual parcel tax on property for seven years to raise approximately $2.36 million annually for educational programs and services. The tax includes an exemption for senior citizens and requires independent oversight of the funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.065948", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.535653", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve excellence in core academic programs with locally controlled funds that cannot be taken by the State, attract and retain qualified teachers, maintain smaller class sizes, support math, science, engineering, technology, art and music programs, improve support for students with special needs, and prepare students for college and modern careers, shall Culver City Unified School District levy an education parcel tax of $189 for seven years, raise approximately $2,362,500 annually, with an exemption for seniors, and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3662, "fingerprint": "2018|201800219|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800219|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6257d5bc7761dcb0", "measure_id": "201800219", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, the city of Lawndale vital city services measure, establishing a three-quarter cent sales tax, generating about $2,100,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted to maintain vital city services, including: 9-1-1 response times, fighting gangs/drugs, ensuring safe drinking water, programs that attract businesses and create jobs, emergency communications systems, neighborhood police patrols/the number of sheriff deputies, addressing homelessness, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight, with all funds to be used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4408, "no_votes": 2462, "total_votes": 6870, "percent_yes": 64.16302765647744, "percent_no": 35.83697234352256, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in Lawndale, California, generating approximately $2.1 million annually to fund city services including public safety, emergency response, water safety, economic development programs, and homelessness services. The tax includes requirements for annual audits and citizen oversight, with all revenue designated for local use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.055200", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.528909", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, the city of Lawndale vital city services measure, establishing a three-quarter cent sales tax, generating about $2,100,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted to maintain vital city services, including: 9-1-1 response times, fighting gangs/drugs, ensuring safe drinking water, programs that attract businesses and create jobs, emergency communications systems, neighborhood police patrols/the number of sheriff deputies, addressing homelessness, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight, with all funds to be used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11201, "fingerprint": "2018|201800561|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800561|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b87780401521318a", "measure_id": "201800561", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize aging classrooms/school facilities at local elementary/intermediate schools, repair termite damage, dry rot, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical, improve student safety/security, and upgrade classrooms, science labs, and facilities to support student achievement in math, science, technology, and arts, shall Lowell Joint School District issue $48,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, an estimated 3 cents per $100 assessed valuation ($3,000,000 annually) for approximately 33 years, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7664, "no_votes": 7386, "total_votes": 15050, "percent_yes": 50.92358803986711, "percent_no": 49.07641196013289, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized Lowell Joint School District to issue $48 m...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized Lowell Joint School District to issue $48 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, including addressing structural damage and upgrading classrooms and labs. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation for approximately 33 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.556420", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.067323", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.536453", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize aging classrooms/school facilities at local elementary/intermediate schools, repair termite damage, dry rot, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical, improve student safety/security, and upgrade classrooms, science labs, and facilities to support student achievement in math, science, technology, and arts, shall Lowell Joint School District issue $48,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, an estimated 3 cents per $100 assessed valuation ($3,000,000 annually) for approximately 33 years, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3682, "fingerprint": "2018|201800550|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800550|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d4ba00b4c3522fb6", "measure_id": "201800550", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide upgrades to facilities, keep schools clean, safe and well-maintained, improve classroom technology, maintain up-to-date textbooks, instructional materials in English, math, science, history, continue funding art/music programs and provide local funding that the State can\u2019t take away, shall Little Lake City School District renew, without increasing, its expiring voter approved tax raising $370,000 annually through a $48 per parcel tax for five years with independent oversight, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and a senior citizen exemption?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2689, "no_votes": 1302, "total_votes": 3991, "percent_yes": 67.37659734402406, "percent_no": 32.62340265597594, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renews an existing $48 per parcel tax for the Little Lake City S...", "summary_text": "This measure renews an existing $48 per parcel tax for the Little Lake City School District for five years, generating $370,000 annually for facility upgrades, classroom technology, instructional materials, and art/music programs. The measure includes a senior citizen exemption and prohibits using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.063648", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.534243", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide upgrades to facilities, keep schools clean, safe and well-maintained, improve classroom technology, maintain up-to-date textbooks, instructional materials in English, math, science, history, continue funding art/music programs and provide local funding that the State can\u2019t take away, shall Little Lake City School District renew, without increasing, its expiring voter approved tax raising $370,000 annually through a $48 per parcel tax for five years with independent oversight, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and a senior citizen exemption?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3661, "fingerprint": "2018|201800218|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800218|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0ca3b269375723df", "measure_id": "201800218", "measure_letter": "LP", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To keep neighborhoods safe; improve 9-1-1 emergency response services; increase sheriff\u2019s deputies\u2019 patrols; expand after-school tutoring, mentoring, gang, and drug prevention programs; economic development; job training; senior services; water conservation; create jobs; fix potholes, local streets; increase graffiti/trash removal; provide other general fund services; shall the City of La Puente sales tax be increased by a half-cent (0.50%), generating about $1.5 million dollars annually, until ended by voters, requiring citizens oversight, all funds spent in La Puente?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5962, "no_votes": 2040, "total_votes": 8002, "percent_yes": 74.50637340664834, "percent_no": 25.493626593351664, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure increased the sales tax in La Puente, California by 0", "summary_text": "This ballot measure increased the sales tax in La Puente, California by 0.5% to generate approximately $1.5 million annually for various city services including public safety, emergency response, street maintenance, and community programs. The tax continues indefinitely until ended by voters and includes citizen oversight requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.054933", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.528721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep neighborhoods safe; improve 9-1-1 emergency response services; increase sheriff\u2019s deputies\u2019 patrols; expand after-school tutoring, mentoring, gang, and drug prevention programs; economic development; job training; senior services; water conservation; create jobs; fix potholes, local streets; increase graffiti/trash removal; provide other general fund services; shall the City of La Puente sales tax be increased by a half-cent (0.50%), generating about $1.5 million dollars annually, until ended by voters, requiring citizens oversight, all funds spent in La Puente?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11202, "fingerprint": "2018|201800562|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800562|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "349911d56d4fb723", "measure_id": "201800562", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve, repair, and modernize outdated Malibu classrooms, science labs, libraries, instructional technology and other school facilities; improve school safety/security systems; shall Santa Monica-\r\nMalibu Unified School District\u2019s School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (Malibu Schools) issue $195 million of bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $10.8 million raised annually to repay issued bonds through final maturity, from levies estimated at three cents per $100 of assessed value, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, all funds benefitting Malibu schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5382, "no_votes": 2194, "total_votes": 7576, "percent_yes": 71.04012671594508, "percent_no": 28.959873284054922, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.556613", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.070120", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.536646", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve, repair, and modernize outdated Malibu classrooms, science labs, libraries, instructional technology and other school facilities; improve school safety/security systems; shall Santa Monica-\r\nMalibu Unified School District\u2019s School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (Malibu Schools) issue $195 million of bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $10.8 million raised annually to repay issued bonds through final maturity, from levies estimated at three cents per $100 of assessed value, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, all funds benefitting Malibu schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3649, "fingerprint": "2018|201800199|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800199|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e3795ceaee8c27fc", "measure_id": "201800199", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain general City services like 9-1-1 emergency response, police/fire protection, street/pothole repairs, senior services, parks and libraries, shall the City of Long Beach amend its Charter to authorize annual fund transfers from the City\u2019s water, sewer and gas utilities to the General Fund not to exceed 12% of utility gross revenues, generating approximately $25,500,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, requiring annual independent audits, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35651, "no_votes": 30659, "total_votes": 66310, "percent_yes": 53.76413813904388, "percent_no": 46.23586186095612, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Long Beach to transfer up to 12% of water...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Long Beach to transfer up to 12% of water, sewer, and gas utility gross revenues annually to the General Fund for general city services, generating approximately $25.5 million per year. The transfers would continue until ended by voters and require annual independent audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.048713", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.525184", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain general City services like 9-1-1 emergency response, police/fire protection, street/pothole repairs, senior services, parks and libraries, shall the City of Long Beach amend its Charter to authorize annual fund transfers from the City\u2019s water, sewer and gas utilities to the General Fund not to exceed 12% of utility gross revenues, generating approximately $25,500,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, requiring annual independent audits, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3683, "fingerprint": "2018|201800551|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800551|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bc7ccec1e0caef83", "measure_id": "201800551", "measure_letter": "MB", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education, keep Manhattan Beach schools among California\u2019s best, offset severe state funding shortfalls and provide $2,650,000 annually the state cannot take away, to: Attract and retain high-quality teachers; Maintain manageable class sizes; Protect quality math, science, reading, art/music programs, shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District levy $225 per parcel annually, expiring in six years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight/audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7769, "no_votes": 3449, "total_votes": 11218, "percent_yes": 69.25476912105545, "percent_no": 30.745230878944554, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Manhattan Beach Unified School District to levy an an...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Manhattan Beach Unified School District to levy an annual $225 parcel tax for six years to fund teacher retention, class size maintenance, and academic programs including math, science, reading, and arts. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and prohibits use of funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.063945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.534447", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education, keep Manhattan Beach schools among California\u2019s best, offset severe state funding shortfalls and provide $2,650,000 annually the state cannot take away, to: Attract and retain high-quality teachers; Maintain manageable class sizes; Protect quality math, science, reading, art/music programs, shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District levy $225 per parcel annually, expiring in six years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight/audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3678, "fingerprint": "2018|201800238|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800238|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "54c77952d61478a7", "measure_id": "201800238", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted repealing the City of South Pasadena\u2019s Utility Users Tax in its entirety, thereby eliminating $3.4 million of locally controlled revenue from the City\u2019s general fund budget which is used to fund police and fire services, street improvement and maintenance programs, library services and park and recreation programs for youth and seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2313, "no_votes": 9148, "total_votes": 11461, "percent_yes": 20.18148503620975, "percent_no": 79.81851496379025, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have repealed South Pasadena's Utility Users Tax entirely,...", "summary_text": "This measure would have repealed South Pasadena's Utility Users Tax entirely, eliminating approximately $3.4 million in annual revenue from the city's general fund that supports various municipal services including public safety, infrastructure, and recreational programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.061070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.532669", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted repealing the City of South Pasadena\u2019s Utility Users Tax in its entirety, thereby eliminating $3.4 million of locally controlled revenue from the City\u2019s general fund budget which is used to fund police and fire services, street improvement and maintenance programs, library services and park and recreation programs for youth and seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11186, "fingerprint": "2018|201800207|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800207|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0ebe21e58b217aa3", "measure_id": "201800207", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City of Burbank\u2019s fire, police, 9-1-1 response; keep fire stations open; maintain the number of police/firefighters; repair streets/potholes; ease traffic; earthquake retrofit city buildings/bridges; maintain senior/after-school programs; address homelessness, other services and aging infrastructure; Shall the measure be adopted approving an ordinance establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $20,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds used in Burbank?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24567, "no_votes": 15190, "total_votes": 39757, "percent_yes": 61.79289181779309, "percent_no": 38.20710818220691, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75 cent sales tax in Burbank to generate approximately $20 million annually for city services including fire, police, street repairs, and other municipal operations. The tax includes audit requirements and citizen oversight, and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.546937", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.051268", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.526678", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City of Burbank\u2019s fire, police, 9-1-1 response; keep fire stations open; maintain the number of police/firefighters; repair streets/potholes; ease traffic; earthquake retrofit city buildings/bridges; maintain senior/after-school programs; address homelessness, other services and aging infrastructure; Shall the measure be adopted approving an ordinance establishing a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $20,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds used in Burbank?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3646, "fingerprint": "2018|201800196|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800196|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3268800312b98eeb", "measure_id": "201800196", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve and increase voter participation, shall the City Charter be amended to change the date of the general municipal election from April in odd numbered years to coincide with the statewide primary election in even numbered years beginning in March 2020 (or as determined by the state legislature) and remove reference to the board of education to reflect recent changes in the election process?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20005, "no_votes": 4080, "total_votes": 24085, "percent_yes": 83.0599958480382, "percent_no": 16.9400041519618, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to move the general municip...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Los Angeles City Charter to move the general municipal election from April in odd-numbered years to coincide with the statewide primary election in even-numbered years beginning in March 2020, and removed outdated references to the board of education election process.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.047591", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.524633", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve and increase voter participation, shall the City Charter be amended to change the date of the general municipal election from April in odd numbered years to coincide with the statewide primary election in even numbered years beginning in March 2020 (or as determined by the state legislature) and remove reference to the board of education to reflect recent changes in the election process?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3672, "fingerprint": "2018|201800231|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800231|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8becf73e7ad1acae", "measure_id": "201800231", "measure_letter": "PC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund City services such as public safety activities and enforcement, crime prevention and other general services, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates up to $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation, and up to 6% of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $400,000 to $500,000 annually, until repealed by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21194, "no_votes": 8570, "total_votes": 29764, "percent_yes": 71.20682703937644, "percent_no": 28.793172960623565, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized Los Angeles to tax cannabis businesses at rates up to ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized Los Angeles to tax cannabis businesses at rates up to $10 per canopy square foot for cultivation and up to 6% of gross receipts for other cannabis operations to fund general city services. The tax was projected to generate approximately $400,000 to $500,000 annually.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.058868", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.531108", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund City services such as public safety activities and enforcement, crime prevention and other general services, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates up to $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation, and up to 6% of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $400,000 to $500,000 annually, until repealed by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3673, "fingerprint": "2018|201800232|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800232|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "40028c2bac3ccf3d", "measure_id": "201800232", "measure_letter": "PG", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain/prevent reductions to City services including 911 emergency response times, police/fire protection, drug/gang-prevention, youth/after-school/park programs, address homelessness; fix streets/potholes, maintain library services, provide senior, business development and other general services for the City of Pomona, shall the measure establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $12,000,000 annually, ending after a period of 10 years be adopted, requiring public disclosure, oversight, all funds for Pomona?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19786, "no_votes": 9966, "total_votes": 29752, "percent_yes": 66.50309222909384, "percent_no": 33.49690777090616, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in Pomona that would generate approximately $12 million annually for 10 years to fund city services including emergency response, police and fire protection, street repairs, libraries, and programs addressing homelessness. The measure requires public disclosure and oversight of all funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.059165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.531289", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/prevent reductions to City services including 911 emergency response times, police/fire protection, drug/gang-prevention, youth/after-school/park programs, address homelessness; fix streets/potholes, maintain library services, provide senior, business development and other general services for the City of Pomona, shall the measure establishing a \u00be\u00a2 sales tax providing approximately $12,000,000 annually, ending after a period of 10 years be adopted, requiring public disclosure, oversight, all funds for Pomona?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3659, "fingerprint": "2018|201800215|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800215|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6ae8fbedf5ed0278", "measure_id": "201800215", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax paid solely by hotel guests from its current rate of 10 percent to 14 percent providing approximately $450,000 annually, with no expiration date to be used for neighborhood sheriff protection, traffic safety improvements, local parks, trails, senior and youth recreation programs and other city services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10817, "no_votes": 5780, "total_votes": 16597, "percent_yes": 65.17442911369524, "percent_no": 34.82557088630476, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel guests in Lo...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel guests in Los Angeles from 10 percent to 14 percent, generating approximately $450,000 annually for neighborhood sheriff protection, traffic safety improvements, parks, trails, recreation programs, and other city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.054020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.528164", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax paid solely by hotel guests from its current rate of 10 percent to 14 percent providing approximately $450,000 annually, with no expiration date to be used for neighborhood sheriff protection, traffic safety improvements, local parks, trails, senior and youth recreation programs and other city services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3686, "fingerprint": "2018|201800556|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800556|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d2eb864f3af715ba", "measure_id": "201800556", "measure_letter": "QS", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain quality teachers and staff, provide local funding to maintain low class sizes, expand college and career courses, increase mental health support, expand instruction in science, technology, engineering, arts and math programs, shall the Burbank Unified School District levy 10 cents per square foot of improved property annually, providing approximately $9,000,000 in annual local funding the state cannot take away until ended by voters, with senior citizen exemptions and independent oversight/audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25413, "no_votes": 14093, "total_votes": 39506, "percent_yes": 64.32693768035234, "percent_no": 35.673062319647656, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Burbank Unified School District to lev...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Burbank Unified School District to levy a property tax of 10 cents per square foot of improved property annually to generate approximately $9 million per year for school programs and services. The tax would have included exemptions for senior citizens and required independent oversight and audits, continuing until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.065678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.535458", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain quality teachers and staff, provide local funding to maintain low class sizes, expand college and career courses, increase mental health support, expand instruction in science, technology, engineering, arts and math programs, shall the Burbank Unified School District levy 10 cents per square foot of improved property annually, providing approximately $9,000,000 in annual local funding the state cannot take away until ended by voters, with senior citizen exemptions and independent oversight/audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11188, "fingerprint": "2018|201800211|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800211|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d2394172bbda7cf7", "measure_id": "201800211", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve City services such as senior and youth services and programs and prevent significant cuts to essential services, including graffiti removal efforts, expanding and improving City park facilities, fixing City streets and public infrastructure, shall the City establish a three-quarter percent transactions and use (sales) tax to raise approximately $750,000 annually, with annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and financial oversight, which will expire in 10 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1947, "no_votes": 1281, "total_votes": 3228, "percent_yes": 60.31598513011153, "percent_no": 39.68401486988847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.75% sales tax in Los Angeles to fund city services including senior and youth programs, park improvements, street repairs, and graffiti removal, generating approximately $750,000 annually for 10 years. The measure includes requirements for annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.547681", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.052759", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.527422", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve City services such as senior and youth services and programs and prevent significant cuts to essential services, including graffiti removal efforts, expanding and improving City park facilities, fixing City streets and public infrastructure, shall the City establish a three-quarter percent transactions and use (sales) tax to raise approximately $750,000 annually, with annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and financial oversight, which will expire in 10 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3643, "fingerprint": "2018|201800192|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800192|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6fbd7132e8d81ae3", "measure_id": "201800192", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize the levy of a 6% utility users' tax on electricity, gas, telecommunications, video and water utility services for commercial/industrial customers, with exemptions for residential services, raising a total amount of $11.9 million for a duration of 10 years after the effective date?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31, "no_votes": 16, "total_votes": 47, "percent_yes": 65.95744680851064, "percent_no": 34.04255319148936, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized a 6% utility users' tax on electricity, gas, telecomm...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized a 6% utility users' tax on electricity, gas, telecommunications, video and water services for commercial and industrial customers only, with residential customers exempt. The tax was projected to raise $11.9 million annually for a 10-year period.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.046299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.523887", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize the levy of a 6% utility users' tax on electricity, gas, telecommunications, video and water utility services for commercial/industrial customers, with exemptions for residential services, raising a total amount of $11.9 million for a duration of 10 years after the effective date?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3675, "fingerprint": "2018|201800235|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800235|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "de6474fcdd289e55", "measure_id": "201800235", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to change the eligibility requirement for service on the City\u2019s Library Board, Personnel Board, and Airport Commission from that of \u201cqualified elector\u201d of the City to \u201cresident\u201d of the City and to ensure compliance with applicable laws related to compensation and reimbursement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29180, "no_votes": 8134, "total_votes": 37314, "percent_yes": 78.20121134158761, "percent_no": 21.79878865841239, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the eligibility requirement for service on Los Angeles' ...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the eligibility requirement for service on Los Angeles' Library Board, Personnel Board, and Airport Commission from being a \"qualified elector\" to being a \"resident\" of the city. It also updated provisions to ensure compliance with laws regarding compensation and reimbursement for these positions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.060177", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.532067", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to change the eligibility requirement for service on the City\u2019s Library Board, Personnel Board, and Airport Commission from that of \u201cqualified elector\u201d of the City to \u201cresident\u201d of the City and to ensure compliance with applicable laws related to compensation and reimbursement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11197, "fingerprint": "2018|201800545|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800545|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "38386cfcfac2ebc4", "measure_id": "201800545", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue funding advanced programs in math, science, reading, engineering, technology, music, and the arts to meet today's higher academic standards; maintain manageable class sizes to enhance student achievement; and attract and retain highly qualified teachers; shall the South Pasadena Unified School District renew the expiring school parcel tax at the current rate of $386 per parcel for a period of 7 years, with annual inflation adjustments, senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and continuing $2.3 million in annual school funding that can't be taken away by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4082, "no_votes": 1026, "total_votes": 5108, "percent_yes": 79.91386061080658, "percent_no": 20.08613938919342, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure renewed South Pasadena Unified School District's existing...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure renewed South Pasadena Unified School District's existing parcel tax at $386 per parcel for seven years with annual inflation adjustments to continue funding educational programs, maintain class sizes, and support teacher retention. The measure included exemptions for seniors and independent oversight, generating approximately $2.3 million annually that cannot be redirected by the state.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-02-27", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.553325", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.062041", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.533265", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding advanced programs in math, science, reading, engineering, technology, music, and the arts to meet today's higher academic standards; maintain manageable class sizes to enhance student achievement; and attract and retain highly qualified teachers; shall the South Pasadena Unified School District renew the expiring school parcel tax at the current rate of $386 per parcel for a period of 7 years, with annual inflation adjustments, senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and continuing $2.3 million in annual school funding that can't be taken away by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11191, "fingerprint": "2018|201800217|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800217|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5a36e2d9b68a6ed4", "measure_id": "201800217", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to expand funding to protect essential services such as fire, paramedics, police, parks, recreation, senior, library, arts and culture, and affordable housing programs and services, and to improve streets and sidewalks, by enacting a three-quarter percent transaction and use (sales) tax that will generate approximately $30,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, with annual audits and all funds staying local, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28363, "no_votes": 23526, "total_votes": 51889, "percent_yes": 54.66091079034092, "percent_no": 45.33908920965908, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.75% sales tax in Los Angeles to fund fire, paramedic, police, parks, recreation, senior, library, arts and culture, and affordable housing services, as well as street and sidewalk improvements. The tax generates approximately $30 million annually and includes provisions for annual audits and local retention of all funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.548797", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.054628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.528540", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to expand funding to protect essential services such as fire, paramedics, police, parks, recreation, senior, library, arts and culture, and affordable housing programs and services, and to improve streets and sidewalks, by enacting a three-quarter percent transaction and use (sales) tax that will generate approximately $30,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, with annual audits and all funds staying local, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3647, "fingerprint": "2018|201800197|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800197|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6158ffa5222ef599", "measure_id": "201800197", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve services such as 911 emergency services, public safety, senior services, community programs and prevent significant cuts to essential services, by funding general City services including hiring additional police personnel, maintaining anti-gang and graffiti efforts, youth and after-school parks and recreation services, expanding and improving City parks, fixing City streets and public infrastructure, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and financial\r\noversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2683, "no_votes": 901, "total_votes": 3584, "percent_yes": 74.86049107142857, "percent_no": 25.13950892857143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased Los Angeles city sales tax by one cent to fund general ...", "summary_text": "The measure increased Los Angeles city sales tax by one cent to fund general city services including police personnel, emergency services, parks and recreation, street repairs, and public infrastructure. The measure also requires annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and financial oversight of the tax revenue.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.047857", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.524813", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve services such as 911 emergency services, public safety, senior services, community programs and prevent significant cuts to essential services, by funding general City services including hiring additional police personnel, maintaining anti-gang and graffiti efforts, youth and after-school parks and recreation services, expanding and improving City parks, fixing City streets and public infrastructure, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and financial\r\noversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3645, "fingerprint": "2018|201800195|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800195|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4ea3d90cbd498721", "measure_id": "201800195", "measure_letter": "SC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to impose an ad valorem tax on real property located in the City of Claremont at the maximum rate of $30.33 per $100,000 of assessed value, for a maximum term of 25 years, to annually raise an estimated $1.55 million through the sale of general obligation bonds with net proceeds of $23.5 million for construction of a new City police facility that will replace the existing 45-year old substandard police building, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5603, "no_votes": 4109, "total_votes": 9712, "percent_yes": 57.69151565074135, "percent_no": 42.30848434925865, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a property tax of up to $30", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a property tax of up to $30.33 per $100,000 of assessed value for up to 25 years to fund $23.5 million in general obligation bonds for constructing a new police facility in Claremont to replace the existing 45-year-old police building. The measure failed despite receiving 57.7% support, likely because it required a two-thirds majority to pass as a bond measure.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.047314", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.524452", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to impose an ad valorem tax on real property located in the City of Claremont at the maximum rate of $30.33 per $100,000 of assessed value, for a maximum term of 25 years, to annually raise an estimated $1.55 million through the sale of general obligation bonds with net proceeds of $23.5 million for construction of a new City police facility that will replace the existing 45-year old substandard police building, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3648, "fingerprint": "2018|201800198|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800198|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bde4783219d72df7", "measure_id": "201800198", "measure_letter": "SE", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to: (1) change the City\u2019s General Municipal Election date for all elective offices to a Statewide Election date commencing in 2020; (2) extend the terms of office of all affected officials one-time and by one year to transition to the new election date; and (3) change the runoff election date to an established election date?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9452, "no_votes": 3363, "total_votes": 12815, "percent_yes": 73.75731564572766, "percent_no": 26.242684354272342, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Inglewood's city charter to move municipal elections to ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Inglewood's city charter to move municipal elections to align with statewide election dates starting in 2020, extended current officials' terms by one year to facilitate the transition, and changed runoff election timing to established election dates.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.048234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.524994", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to: (1) change the City\u2019s General Municipal Election date for all elective offices to a Statewide Election date commencing in 2020; (2) extend the terms of office of all affected officials one-time and by one year to transition to the new election date; and (3) change the runoff election date to an established election date?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3676, "fingerprint": "2018|201800236|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800236|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "727ef414994aef03", "measure_id": "201800236", "measure_letter": "SM", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter Section 615 be amended to require, for a period of ten years, the votes of five Council members to amend (a) the Land Use and Circulation Element or (b) Downtown Community Plan, where that amendment would increase the maximum height limit or floor area ratio in any land use designation, with exceptions for 100% Affordable Housing Projects and property owned by Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26476, "no_votes": 10908, "total_votes": 37384, "percent_yes": 70.82174192167773, "percent_no": 29.178258078322273, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires a supermajority of five City Council members ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires a supermajority of five City Council members (instead of a simple majority) to approve amendments to the Land Use and Circulation Element or Downtown Community Plan that would increase maximum building height limits or floor area ratios for a ten-year period. The supermajority requirement includes exceptions for 100% affordable housing projects and property owned by the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.060481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.532271", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter Section 615 be amended to require, for a period of ten years, the votes of five Council members to amend (a) the Land Use and Circulation Element or (b) Downtown Community Plan, where that amendment would increase the maximum height limit or floor area ratio in any land use designation, with exceptions for 100% Affordable Housing Projects and property owned by Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3692, "fingerprint": "2018|201800564|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800564|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a69479bc7206949d", "measure_id": "201800564", "measure_letter": "SMS", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve, repair, and modernize outdated Santa Monica classrooms, science labs, libraries, instructional technology and other school facilities; improve school safety/security systems; shall Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District\u2019s School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Santa Monica Schools) issue $485 million of bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $27.4 million raised annually to repay issued bonds through final maturity, from levies estimated at four cents per $100 assessed value, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and all funds benefitting Santa Monica schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30052, "no_votes": 11649, "total_votes": 41701, "percent_yes": 72.06541809548932, "percent_no": 27.93458190451068, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District to issue $485 million in bonds to improve, repair, and modernize school facilities including classrooms, science labs, libraries, and safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies estimated at four cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.070812", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.537045", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve, repair, and modernize outdated Santa Monica classrooms, science labs, libraries, instructional technology and other school facilities; improve school safety/security systems; shall Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District\u2019s School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Santa Monica Schools) issue $485 million of bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $27.4 million raised annually to repay issued bonds through final maturity, from levies estimated at four cents per $100 assessed value, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and all funds benefitting Santa Monica schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11195, "fingerprint": "2018|201800239|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800239|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bbf39c8f788a5b89", "measure_id": "201800239", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed by the City Manager?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7295, "no_votes": 19036, "total_votes": 26331, "percent_yes": 27.70498651779272, "percent_no": 72.29501348220728, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the City Treasurer position in Los Angeles fr...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the City Treasurer position in Los Angeles from an elected office to one appointed by the City Manager. The measure failed with 27.7% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.552946", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.061385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.532876", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed by the City Manager?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11184, "fingerprint": "2018|201800193|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800193|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "adb815a8b4f39417", "measure_id": "201800193", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential City services/infrastructure like police, fire, parks, libraries, streets and street lighting, shall the measure be adopted amending the City of Burbank Charter to continue the past practice of transferring not more than 7% of Burbank Water and Power\u2019s gross annual sales of electricity, paid by retail electric rate payers, providing approximately $12.5 million annually to the City\u2019s General Fund until ended by voters, with all money spent to benefit Burbank residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15969, "no_votes": 3721, "total_votes": 19690, "percent_yes": 81.10208227526662, "percent_no": 18.897917724733375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Burbank's city charter to formalize the practice of tran...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Burbank's city charter to formalize the practice of transferring up to 7% of the municipal utility's gross annual electricity sales (approximately $12.5 million) from electric ratepayers to the city's general fund for essential services. The transfer would continue until voters decide to end it in a future election.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.544326", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.046667", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.524069", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential City services/infrastructure like police, fire, parks, libraries, streets and street lighting, shall the measure be adopted amending the City of Burbank Charter to continue the past practice of transferring not more than 7% of Burbank Water and Power\u2019s gross annual sales of electricity, paid by retail electric rate payers, providing approximately $12.5 million annually to the City\u2019s General Fund until ended by voters, with all money spent to benefit Burbank residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3639, "fingerprint": "2018|201800186|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800186|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7101b2e9d1e10285", "measure_id": "201800186", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For the sole purpose of improving or replacing the Catalina Island Medical Center and related administration and financing costs, shall the Avalon Municipal Code be amended to impose a one dollar ($1.00) special tax per passenger arriving to or departing from the City of Avalon by cruise ship, ferry or aircraft, generating approximately $1,900,000 annually in funding for the Medical Center, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 392, "no_votes": 497, "total_votes": 889, "percent_yes": 44.09448818897638, "percent_no": 55.90551181102362, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a $1 special tax on each passenger arriving t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a $1 special tax on each passenger arriving to or departing from Avalon by cruise ship, ferry, or aircraft to fund improvements or replacement of the Catalina Island Medical Center. The tax was projected to generate approximately $1.9 million annually until ended by voters.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.044277", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.522798", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the sole purpose of improving or replacing the Catalina Island Medical Center and related administration and financing costs, shall the Avalon Municipal Code be amended to impose a one dollar ($1.00) special tax per passenger arriving to or departing from the City of Avalon by cruise ship, ferry or aircraft, generating approximately $1,900,000 annually in funding for the Medical Center, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3677, "fingerprint": "2018|201800237|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800237|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b303689da4648167", "measure_id": "201800237", "measure_letter": "TL", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Monica City Charter be amended to prohibit any person from serving as a member of the City Council for more than three terms, whether consecutive or not, where a term includes any full term of four years as well as any partial term of more than two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29237, "no_votes": 10193, "total_votes": 39430, "percent_yes": 74.14912503170174, "percent_no": 25.850874968298257, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment establishes term limits for Santa Monica City Council ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment establishes term limits for Santa Monica City Council members, prohibiting any person from serving more than three terms (including both full four-year terms and partial terms exceeding two years). The measure passed in 2018 with 74.1% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.060773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.532472", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Monica City Charter be amended to prohibit any person from serving as a member of the City Council for more than three terms, whether consecutive or not, where a term includes any full term of four years as well as any partial term of more than two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3650, "fingerprint": "2018|201800200|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800200|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dec9ab5c3c3088d6", "measure_id": "201800200", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance, placed on the ballot by the City Council, be adopted to increase the rate of the City\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax, paid only by visitors to the City, from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) to raise an additional $400,000 per year in revenue to fund general City services such as public safety, parks and recreation, and senior services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4356, "no_votes": 2262, "total_votes": 6618, "percent_yes": 65.82048957388939, "percent_no": 34.17951042611061, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Los Angeles's transient occupancy tax rate from 10% to...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Los Angeles's transient occupancy tax rate from 10% to 12%, which applies to hotel stays and other short-term accommodations by visitors. The increase was projected to generate an additional $400,000 annually in general fund revenue for city services including public safety, parks and recreation, and senior services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.049161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.525373", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance, placed on the ballot by the City Council, be adopted to increase the rate of the City\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax, paid only by visitors to the City, from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) to raise an additional $400,000 per year in revenue to fund general City services such as public safety, parks and recreation, and senior services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3658, "fingerprint": "2018|201800212|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800212|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0e7cef6d8189d80d", "measure_id": "201800212", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund city services, including public safety and emergency services; park and street maintenance; and recreational programs; shall the City increase the license tax on casino licenses and other gambling operations to 15% percent of total monthly gross gaming revenues with a required minimum license fee of $10,000 per month to raise a minimum of $120,000 per year or more depending on the level of gross gaming revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2527, "no_votes": 671, "total_votes": 3198, "percent_yes": 79.0181363352095, "percent_no": 20.981863664790495, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Los Angeles's license tax on casino licenses and gambl...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Los Angeles's license tax on casino licenses and gambling operations to 15% of monthly gross gaming revenues with a minimum monthly fee of $10,000, designed to generate at least $120,000 annually for city services including public safety, parks, and recreational programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.053090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.527603", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund city services, including public safety and emergency services; park and street maintenance; and recreational programs; shall the City increase the license tax on casino licenses and other gambling operations to 15% percent of total monthly gross gaming revenues with a required minimum license fee of $10,000 per month to raise a minimum of $120,000 per year or more depending on the level of gross gaming revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11196, "fingerprint": "2018|201800240|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800240|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "30b234a75bc1b300", "measure_id": "201800240", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed by the City Manager?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8540, "no_votes": 17645, "total_votes": 26185, "percent_yes": 32.614092037426005, "percent_no": 67.385907962574, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the City Clerk position in Los Angeles from a...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the City Clerk position in Los Angeles from an elected office to one appointed by the City Manager. The measure failed with 32.6% of voters supporting the change.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.553135", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.061744", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.533071", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed by the City Manager?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3644, "fingerprint": "2018|201800194|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800194|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "daf382d9b80b7c9b", "measure_id": "201800194", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase voter participation in City of Burbank elections, shall the measure be adopted amending City of Burbank Charter: 1.) changing City\u2019s odd-numbered year general elections to November of even-numbered years coinciding with State/Federal elections and conforming to state law; 2.) eliminating City\u2019s primary election; 3.) extending elected City official terms, one time, by one year and eight months to transition to even-numbered year elections; 4.) simplifying the election process in the Charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15808, "no_votes": 3676, "total_votes": 19484, "percent_yes": 81.13323752822829, "percent_no": 18.866762471771708, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the City of Burbank's general elections from odd-numbere...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the City of Burbank's general elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years to coincide with state and federal elections, while eliminating the city's primary election system. It also extended current elected officials' terms by one year and eight months as a one-time transition to the new election schedule.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.047009", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.524259", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase voter participation in City of Burbank elections, shall the measure be adopted amending City of Burbank Charter: 1.) changing City\u2019s odd-numbered year general elections to November of even-numbered years coinciding with State/Federal elections and conforming to state law; 2.) eliminating City\u2019s primary election; 3.) extending elected City official terms, one time, by one year and eight months to transition to even-numbered year elections; 4.) simplifying the election process in the Charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3655, "fingerprint": "2018|201800206|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800206|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "78e4f0f01855364f", "measure_id": "201800206", "measure_letter": "VP", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To comply with State law intended to increase voting participation in local elections and save money on election costs, shall the Temple City Charter be amended to change the date for Temple City municipal elections from the first Tuesday after the first Monday of March in odd numbered years to the first Tuesday after the first Monday of March in even numbered years (which does not otherwise grant the City new powers)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3285, "no_votes": 985, "total_votes": 4270, "percent_yes": 76.93208430913349, "percent_no": 23.067915690866514, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends the Temple City Charter to move municipal elections from o...", "summary_text": "The measure amends the Temple City Charter to move municipal elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years, with both occurring on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of March.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.050969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.526497", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To comply with State law intended to increase voting participation in local elections and save money on election costs, shall the Temple City Charter be amended to change the date for Temple City municipal elections from the first Tuesday after the first Monday of March in odd numbered years to the first Tuesday after the first Monday of March in even numbered years (which does not otherwise grant the City new powers)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11199, "fingerprint": "2018|201800552|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800552|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1bae1831044dee6c", "measure_id": "201800552", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain all K-12 classrooms and labs; upgrade facilities to better prepare students for college and careers; provide 21st century learning technology; and otherwise continue improving our elementary, middle and high schools, shall Wiseburn Unified School District issue $29,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, projected tax rates of 1.9\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation, estimated levies averaging $2.1 million annually through approximately 2042, citizens\u2019 oversight, audits, NO funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, and ALL funds\r\nbenefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1631, "no_votes": 1437, "total_votes": 3068, "percent_yes": 53.16166883963495, "percent_no": 46.83833116036505, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Wiseburn Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Wiseburn Unified School District to issue $29 million in bonds to maintain and upgrade K-12 school facilities, technology, and classrooms, funded by a property tax of approximately 1.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation. The measure failed despite receiving 53.2% yes votes, as California school bond measures require a two-thirds majority to pass.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.554631", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.064243", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.534651", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain all K-12 classrooms and labs; upgrade facilities to better prepare students for college and careers; provide 21st century learning technology; and otherwise continue improving our elementary, middle and high schools, shall Wiseburn Unified School District issue $29,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, projected tax rates of 1.9\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation, estimated levies averaging $2.1 million annually through approximately 2042, citizens\u2019 oversight, audits, NO funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, and ALL funds\r\nbenefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3636, "fingerprint": "2018|201800039|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800039|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5f97eee7a1d35cef", "measure_id": "201800039", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance improving/protecting water quality; capturing rain/stormwater to increase safe drinking water supplies and prepare for future drought; protecting public health and marine life by reducing pollution, trash, toxins/plastics entering Los Angeles County waterways/bays/beaches; establishing a parcel tax of 2.5\u00a2 per square foot of impermeable area, exempting low-income seniors, raising approximately $300,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, oversight and local control be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1805050, "no_votes": 793890, "total_votes": 2598940, "percent_yes": 69.45331558250672, "percent_no": 30.54668441749328, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a parcel tax of 2", "summary_text": "This measure established a parcel tax of 2.5 cents per square foot of impermeable area to fund water quality improvements, stormwater capture, and pollution reduction projects in Los Angeles County. The tax includes exemptions for low-income seniors and is expected to raise approximately $300 million annually with independent oversight requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.043335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.522232", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance improving/protecting water quality; capturing rain/stormwater to increase safe drinking water supplies and prepare for future drought; protecting public health and marine life by reducing pollution, trash, toxins/plastics entering Los Angeles County waterways/bays/beaches; establishing a parcel tax of 2.5\u00a2 per square foot of impermeable area, exempting low-income seniors, raising approximately $300,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, oversight and local control be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3693, "fingerprint": "2018|201800565|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800565|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b27186a34d437ed3", "measure_id": "201800565", "measure_letter": "WE", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize classrooms and support facilities, integrate school facilities with academic programs, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, improve student safety, and qualify the District to receive State grants, shall the Wilsona School District issue $6,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy an estimated 3 cents/$100 of assessed value, raising an average $351,916 annually while bonds are outstanding, with regular expenditure transparency measures including annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1257, "no_votes": 542, "total_votes": 1799, "percent_yes": 69.87215119510839, "percent_no": 30.127848804891613, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Wilsona School District to issue $6", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Wilsona School District to issue $6.5 million in bonds to modernize classrooms, upgrade technology, improve student safety, and support facilities. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.071188", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.537247", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize classrooms and support facilities, integrate school facilities with academic programs, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, improve student safety, and qualify the District to receive State grants, shall the Wilsona School District issue $6,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy an estimated 3 cents/$100 of assessed value, raising an average $351,916 annually while bonds are outstanding, with regular expenditure transparency measures including annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3667, "fingerprint": "2018|201800224|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800224|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f554ec13e8c25b93", "measure_id": "201800224", "measure_letter": "WW", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require Long Beach hotels containing more than 50 rooms to provide personal emergency contact devices for hotel workers, adopt restrictions on the square footage of hotel areas which may be cleaned and establish penalties for failure to comply with the restrictions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84411, "no_votes": 46480, "total_votes": 130891, "percent_yes": 64.48953709575143, "percent_no": 35.51046290424857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance requires Long Beach hotels with more than 50 rooms to provide p...", "summary_text": "The ordinance requires Long Beach hotels with more than 50 rooms to provide personal emergency contact devices for hotel workers and sets restrictions on the square footage of hotel areas that may be cleaned. It establishes penalties for hotels that fail to comply with these requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.056683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.529812", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require Long Beach hotels containing more than 50 rooms to provide personal emergency contact devices for hotel workers, adopt restrictions on the square footage of hotel areas which may be cleaned and establish penalties for failure to comply with the restrictions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11198, "fingerprint": "2018|201800547|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800547|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bf3045f2e1fae577", "measure_id": "201800547", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To comply with state law to increase voter participation, Burbank Unified School District is changing its Board elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years and will conduct their own elections in conjunction with Los Angeles County\u2019s Election Division. Shall the measure be adopted amending the City of Burbank Charter to clarify that BUSD Board elections will be conducted according to state law election procedures, rather than the City\u2019s election procedures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15999, "no_votes": 3414, "total_votes": 19413, "percent_yes": 82.41384639159325, "percent_no": 17.586153608406747, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the City of Burbank Charter to move Burbank Unified Scho...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the City of Burbank Charter to move Burbank Unified School District Board elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years and clarify that these elections would follow state election procedures rather than city procedures. The district would conduct elections in conjunction with Los Angeles County's Election Division to comply with state law aimed at increasing voter participation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.553696", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.062680", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.533658", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To comply with state law to increase voter participation, Burbank Unified School District is changing its Board elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years and will conduct their own elections in conjunction with Los Angeles County\u2019s Election Division. Shall the measure be adopted amending the City of Burbank Charter to clarify that BUSD Board elections will be conducted according to state law election procedures, rather than the City\u2019s election procedures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3674, "fingerprint": "2018|201800234|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800234|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4ec912860999a336", "measure_id": "201800234", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain quality neighborhoods and effective 911 emergency response services by retaining firefighters, police officers, and paramedics; fixing potholes/streets; maintaining senior services, parks, library services, after school programs, community events, and graffiti removal shall a one cent transactions and use tax available for general municipal revenue purposes be collected in the City of Santa Fe Springs generating approximately $12.8 million annually, until ended by voters, requiring annual audits, with all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3962, "no_votes": 1285, "total_votes": 5247, "percent_yes": 75.50981513245664, "percent_no": 24.490184867543363, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes a one cent sales tax in Santa Fe Springs to generate ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes a one cent sales tax in Santa Fe Springs to generate approximately $12.8 million annually for general municipal services including public safety, street repairs, parks, libraries, and other city programs. The tax continues indefinitely until repealed by voters and requires annual audits with local control of funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.059817", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.531841", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality neighborhoods and effective 911 emergency response services by retaining firefighters, police officers, and paramedics; fixing potholes/streets; maintaining senior services, parks, library services, after school programs, community events, and graffiti removal shall a one cent transactions and use tax available for general municipal revenue purposes be collected in the City of Santa Fe Springs generating approximately $12.8 million annually, until ended by voters, requiring annual audits, with all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3695, "fingerprint": "2018|201800566|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800566|MADERA", "content_hash": "f76cfa34e692ffd1", "measure_id": "201800566", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain student safety, accommodate growing student enrollment, enhance access to technology, improve accessibility for students with disabilities by constructing new school facilities, modernizing outdated classrooms/restrooms/school facilities and improving student safety/security shall Madera Unified School District issue $120,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, generating $6,700,000 annually and levying 5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10050, "no_votes": 5778, "total_votes": 15828, "percent_yes": 63.4950720242608, "percent_no": 36.5049279757392, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.071824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.537645", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain student safety, accommodate growing student enrollment, enhance access to technology, improve accessibility for students with disabilities by constructing new school facilities, modernizing outdated classrooms/restrooms/school facilities and improving student safety/security shall Madera Unified School District issue $120,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, generating $6,700,000 annually and levying 5\u00a2 per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, with independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3694, "fingerprint": "2018|201800241|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800241|MADERA", "content_hash": "3bae8cb2f10a835d", "measure_id": "201800241", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent the loss of Chowchilla\u2019s local police department, maintain/protect local police/fire services, including 911 police, fire, emergency medical response times; Drug/gang enforcement/prevention services; violent/property crime prevention; combatting methamphetamine; maintaining drug use prevention programs; and other local fire/medical response services, shall a measure establishing a one-cent sales tax for 8 years be adopted, providing $1,300,000 annually, including citizens oversight, annual audits, all funds used locally in Chowchilla?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2121, "no_votes": 773, "total_votes": 2894, "percent_yes": 73.28956461644782, "percent_no": 26.71043538355218, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.071466", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.537444", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent the loss of Chowchilla\u2019s local police department, maintain/protect local police/fire services, including 911 police, fire, emergency medical response times; Drug/gang enforcement/prevention services; violent/property crime prevention; combatting methamphetamine; maintaining drug use prevention programs; and other local fire/medical response services, shall a measure establishing a one-cent sales tax for 8 years be adopted, providing $1,300,000 annually, including citizens oversight, annual audits, all funds used locally in Chowchilla?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3708, "fingerprint": "2018|201800567|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800567|MARIN", "content_hash": "f5d6172050c8e529", "measure_id": "201800567", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure quality education and protect $4.5 million in expiring annual local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Kentfield School District maintain core academics, including math, science, reading and writing; attract and retain exceptional teachers; and preserve small classes by adding $355 to the current $1,143 per parcel rate and continuing local school funding for 10 years, with senior exemptions, annual inflation adjustments, independent citizens oversight, and all funds for Kentfield students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3227, "no_votes": 1482, "total_votes": 4709, "percent_yes": 68.5283499681461, "percent_no": 31.471650031853898, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would increase the Kentfield School District's parcel tax by $35...", "summary_text": "This measure would increase the Kentfield School District's parcel tax by $355 per parcel (from $1,143 to $1,498) for 10 years to fund core academics, teacher retention, and small class sizes. The tax would include senior exemptions, annual inflation adjustments, and independent oversight, with all funds designated for local students.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-03-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.075660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.540224", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure quality education and protect $4.5 million in expiring annual local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Kentfield School District maintain core academics, including math, science, reading and writing; attract and retain exceptional teachers; and preserve small classes by adding $355 to the current $1,143 per parcel rate and continuing local school funding for 10 years, with senior exemptions, annual inflation adjustments, independent citizens oversight, and all funds for Kentfield students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3698, "fingerprint": "2018|201800042|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800042|MARIN", "content_hash": "953c06a8c0175c90", "measure_id": "201800042", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to relieve traffic congestion on Highway 101 and local roads; fix potholes/maintain local roads; improve interchanges/access to/from Highway 101; expand safe routes to schools, including school bus service/funding crossing guards; and, provide local transit, including options for seniors/persons with disabilities, shall Marin County renew the existing half-cent, voter approved sales tax without increasing the current rate, providing $27,000,000 annually for 30 years, with citizens\u2019 oversight, that the State cannot take away?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 93158, "no_votes": 28378, "total_votes": 121536, "percent_yes": 76.65053975776725, "percent_no": 23.34946024223275, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed Marin County's existing half-cent sales tax for 30 years...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed Marin County's existing half-cent sales tax for 30 years without increasing the current rate, generating approximately $27 million annually for transportation projects including road maintenance, Highway 101 improvements, safe routes to schools, and local transit services. The measure included citizen oversight provisions and protected the funds from state seizure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.072639", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.538251", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to relieve traffic congestion on Highway 101 and local roads; fix potholes/maintain local roads; improve interchanges/access to/from Highway 101; expand safe routes to schools, including school bus service/funding crossing guards; and, provide local transit, including options for seniors/persons with disabilities, shall Marin County renew the existing half-cent, voter approved sales tax without increasing the current rate, providing $27,000,000 annually for 30 years, with citizens\u2019 oversight, that the State cannot take away?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3709, "fingerprint": "2018|201800568|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800568|MARIN", "content_hash": "596dd5b5d784a9bc", "measure_id": "201800568", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education and provide approximately $2.6 million in annual local school funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Dixie Elementary School District: attract and retain qualified teachers; maintain core academics, including math, science, technology, music, reading/writing; keep school libraries open by renewing local school funding at the current $352 rate and adding $118 per parcel for twelve years with senior exemptions, annual inflation adjustments, independent citizen oversight, and all funds for Dixie students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4597, "no_votes": 1911, "total_votes": 6508, "percent_yes": 70.6361401352182, "percent_no": 29.3638598647818, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure renewed existing local school funding at $352 per parcel ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure renewed existing local school funding at $352 per parcel and added an additional $118 per parcel for twelve years to provide approximately $2.6 million annually for the Dixie Elementary School District. The measure includes senior exemptions, annual inflation adjustments, and independent citizen oversight, with funds designated for teacher retention, core academics, and maintaining school libraries.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-05-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.075979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.540418", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education and provide approximately $2.6 million in annual local school funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Dixie Elementary School District: attract and retain qualified teachers; maintain core academics, including math, science, technology, music, reading/writing; keep school libraries open by renewing local school funding at the current $352 rate and adding $118 per parcel for twelve years with senior exemptions, annual inflation adjustments, independent citizen oversight, and all funds for Dixie students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3710, "fingerprint": "2018|201800569|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800569|MARIN", "content_hash": "e44c2b6e9af9acb4", "measure_id": "201800569", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide local funding the State cannot take away, preserve high quality education in reading, writing, math, science, educationally sound class sizes, school libraries, art/music instruction, and attract and retain highly-qualified teachers, shall Ross Valley School District renew its existing $621.66 per parcel tax with 3% annual adjustments, raising $4,000,000 annually, for eight years, exemptions for seniors, annual audits and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, legal or pension costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7229, "no_votes": 2153, "total_votes": 9382, "percent_yes": 77.05180132167982, "percent_no": 22.948198678320182, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure renews an existing parcel tax of $621", "summary_text": "The measure renews an existing parcel tax of $621.66 per property with 3% annual increases for eight years to raise approximately $4 million annually for the Ross Valley School District. The funds are designated for educational programs, class size management, libraries, arts/music instruction, and teacher retention, with exemptions for seniors and restrictions preventing use for administrator salaries, legal costs, or pensions.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.076276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.540611", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide local funding the State cannot take away, preserve high quality education in reading, writing, math, science, educationally sound class sizes, school libraries, art/music instruction, and attract and retain highly-qualified teachers, shall Ross Valley School District renew its existing $621.66 per parcel tax with 3% annual adjustments, raising $4,000,000 annually, for eight years, exemptions for seniors, annual audits and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, legal or pension costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3699, "fingerprint": "2018|201800242|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800242|MARIN", "content_hash": "85e026e704ec3241", "measure_id": "201800242", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Corte Madera (1) eliminate the special drainage property tax ($98 per residential unit or per 1,000 commercial square feet) AND (2) extend the existing 1/2\u00a2 sales tax at a 3/4\u00a2 rate until ended by voters, providing $3,500,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes (for example, flood/sea level rise/disaster preparedness, fire prevention, street repair, improved traffic flow, safety improvements, 911 response, and senior/youth programs) subject to annual audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2485, "no_votes": 743, "total_votes": 3228, "percent_yes": 76.98265179677819, "percent_no": 23.017348203221815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would eliminate Corte Madera's special drainage property tax of ...", "summary_text": "This measure would eliminate Corte Madera's special drainage property tax of $98 per residential unit or per 1,000 commercial square feet and increase the existing half-cent sales tax to three-quarters of a cent to generate approximately $3.5 million annually for general city purposes. The sales tax increase would continue until ended by voters and be subject to annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.072943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.538456", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Corte Madera (1) eliminate the special drainage property tax ($98 per residential unit or per 1,000 commercial square feet) AND (2) extend the existing 1/2\u00a2 sales tax at a 3/4\u00a2 rate until ended by voters, providing $3,500,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes (for example, flood/sea level rise/disaster preparedness, fire prevention, street repair, improved traffic flow, safety improvements, 911 response, and senior/youth programs) subject to annual audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3700, "fingerprint": "2018|201800243|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800243|MARIN", "content_hash": "ebc2f000e2c7f4a7", "measure_id": "201800243", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain/enhance City of San Rafael services, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including: enhancing police and fire services, repairing potholes/maintaining streets, enhancing community centers, and administering a cannabis oversight program; shall the City of San Rafael\u2019s ordinance levying, until repealed, a tax of up to 8% on cannabis (marijuana) businesses\u2019 gross receipts in the city, eventually ramping up to approximately $1,000,000 in new funding annually, requiring independent citizen oversight and financial audits be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12772, "no_votes": 2539, "total_votes": 15311, "percent_yes": 83.4171510678597, "percent_no": 16.582848932140294, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.073295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.538661", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/enhance City of San Rafael services, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including: enhancing police and fire services, repairing potholes/maintaining streets, enhancing community centers, and administering a cannabis oversight program; shall the City of San Rafael\u2019s ordinance levying, until repealed, a tax of up to 8% on cannabis (marijuana) businesses\u2019 gross receipts in the city, eventually ramping up to approximately $1,000,000 in new funding annually, requiring independent citizen oversight and financial audits be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3711, "fingerprint": "2018|201800570|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800570|MARIN", "content_hash": "12a12ef1059c9f7f", "measure_id": "201800570", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize outdated classrooms and buildings, replace aging portables, upgrade infrastructure, construct new educational facilities, and improve access to technology, shall Shoreline Unified School District issue $19.5 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with projected tax rates of 3.9\u00a2 per $100 of taxable value while bonds are outstanding (generating on average approximately $1.45 million annually for issued bonds), and requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and all funds spent to benefit Shoreline students and schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1313, "no_votes": 573, "total_votes": 1886, "percent_yes": 69.61823966065748, "percent_no": 30.38176033934252, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Shoreline Unified School District to issue $19", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Shoreline Unified School District to issue $19.5 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities, replace portable classrooms, upgrade infrastructure, and improve technology access. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a projected rate of 3.9 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.076573", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.540813", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize outdated classrooms and buildings, replace aging portables, upgrade infrastructure, construct new educational facilities, and improve access to technology, shall Shoreline Unified School District issue $19.5 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with projected tax rates of 3.9\u00a2 per $100 of taxable value while bonds are outstanding (generating on average approximately $1.45 million annually for issued bonds), and requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and all funds spent to benefit Shoreline students and schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3712, "fingerprint": "2018|201800571|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800571|MARIN", "content_hash": "dbfd4a076d18f6ef", "measure_id": "201800571", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect high quality education with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Tamalpais Union High School District attract and retain highly qualified teachers, counselors and staff; provide excellent science, technology, engineering, math, reading /writing instruction; protect art /music programs; and maintain small class sizes by levying $149 per parcel, providing $5.1 million annually for 4 years, with senior exemptions, annual cost of living adjustments, independent citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds for local high school students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45775, "no_votes": 16092, "total_votes": 61867, "percent_yes": 73.98936428144245, "percent_no": 26.010635718557552, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the Tamalpais Union High School District to levy a $14...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the Tamalpais Union High School District to levy a $149 annual parcel tax for four years to generate $5.1 million annually for educational programs and services. The tax includes exemptions for seniors, annual cost of living adjustments, and independent oversight of fund usage.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.076846", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.541015", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect high quality education with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Tamalpais Union High School District attract and retain highly qualified teachers, counselors and staff; provide excellent science, technology, engineering, math, reading /writing instruction; protect art /music programs; and maintain small class sizes by levying $149 per parcel, providing $5.1 million annually for 4 years, with senior exemptions, annual cost of living adjustments, independent citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds for local high school students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3703, "fingerprint": "2018|201800246|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800246|MARIN", "content_hash": "3f9246ea609e0319", "measure_id": "201800246", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure continuing the special tax for paramedic services for four years in the amount of $79.50 in the first year and increasing $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in nonresidential use, which will annually raise approximately $600,000 beginning in year one, and increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4190, "no_votes": 1902, "total_votes": 6092, "percent_yes": 68.77872619829284, "percent_no": 31.221273801707156, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.074274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.539245", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure continuing the special tax for paramedic services for four years in the amount of $79.50 in the first year and increasing $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in nonresidential use, which will annually raise approximately $600,000 beginning in year one, and increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3706, "fingerprint": "2018|201800249|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800249|MARIN", "content_hash": "d8bc3c2795c4fb06", "measure_id": "201800249", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address the effects of tourism by improving traffic enforcement for pedestrian, cyclist and driver safety; managing the number of bikes, buses, taxis; reinvesting in local businesses; and other essential city services, shall an ordinance raising the transient occupancy tax rate charged to hotel guests by 2% be adopted until ended by voters, providing additional $300,000 annually, with independent audits, all funds used locally in Sausalito?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3417, "no_votes": 729, "total_votes": 4146, "percent_yes": 82.41678726483357, "percent_no": 17.583212735166427, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure raised the transient occupancy tax rate for hotel guests in Saus...", "summary_text": "This measure raised the transient occupancy tax rate for hotel guests in Sausalito by 2% to generate an estimated $300,000 annually for traffic enforcement, transportation management, local business reinvestment, and other city services. The tax increase would remain in effect until ended by voters and includes provisions for independent audits with all funds used locally.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.075069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.539830", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address the effects of tourism by improving traffic enforcement for pedestrian, cyclist and driver safety; managing the number of bikes, buses, taxis; reinvesting in local businesses; and other essential city services, shall an ordinance raising the transient occupancy tax rate charged to hotel guests by 2% be adopted until ended by voters, providing additional $300,000 annually, with independent audits, all funds used locally in Sausalito?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3707, "fingerprint": "2018|201800250|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800250|MARIN", "content_hash": "5ea7c9e525dcbc8c", "measure_id": "201800250", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain city services, including police protection; fixing streets, sidewalks, and storm drains; supporting local businesses; and other general services, shall an ordinance simplifying Sausalito\u2019s business license ordinance for fairness to businesses of all sizes, be adopted until ended by voters, updating business license rates to $125 per business and between $1-$3 per $1,000 of gross receipts, generating approximately $896,750 annually, requiring audits and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2649, "no_votes": 1400, "total_votes": 4049, "percent_yes": 65.42356137317856, "percent_no": 34.57643862682144, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure simplified Sausalito's business license ordinance by establishin...", "summary_text": "This measure simplified Sausalito's business license ordinance by establishing a flat $125 annual fee per business plus a rate of $1-$3 per $1,000 of gross receipts. The measure was projected to generate approximately $896,750 annually for general city services with required audits and local use of funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.075362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.540023", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain city services, including police protection; fixing streets, sidewalks, and storm drains; supporting local businesses; and other general services, shall an ordinance simplifying Sausalito\u2019s business license ordinance for fairness to businesses of all sizes, be adopted until ended by voters, updating business license rates to $125 per business and between $1-$3 per $1,000 of gross receipts, generating approximately $896,750 annually, requiring audits and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3701, "fingerprint": "2018|201800244|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800244|MARIN", "content_hash": "6c01f7dbe96d1046", "measure_id": "201800244", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to continue for four more years the special tax for paramedic and/or emergency medical services at the existing annual amount of $75 per residence and per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal years 2019-2020 through 2022-2023, with anticipated annual revenues of $500,000, and with the appropriations limit increasing by the amount of the tax, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3644, "no_votes": 1023, "total_votes": 4667, "percent_yes": 78.08013713306192, "percent_no": 21.919862866938075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.073604", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.538861", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to continue for four more years the special tax for paramedic and/or emergency medical services at the existing annual amount of $75 per residence and per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal years 2019-2020 through 2022-2023, with anticipated annual revenues of $500,000, and with the appropriations limit increasing by the amount of the tax, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3702, "fingerprint": "2018|201800245|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800245|MARIN", "content_hash": "0cee7835f379b6cf", "measure_id": "201800245", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure continuing the special tax for paramedic services for four years in the amount of $79.50 in the first year and increasing $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in nonresidential use, which will annually raise approximately $296,000 beginning in year one, and increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3134, "no_votes": 922, "total_votes": 4056, "percent_yes": 77.26824457593689, "percent_no": 22.73175542406311, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues a special tax for paramedic services in Marin County f...", "summary_text": "This measure continues a special tax for paramedic services in Marin County for four years, starting at $79.50 per taxable living unit in the first year and increasing by $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50. The tax is expected to raise approximately $296,000 annually beginning in the first year.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.073894", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.539053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure continuing the special tax for paramedic services for four years in the amount of $79.50 in the first year and increasing $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in nonresidential use, which will annually raise approximately $296,000 beginning in year one, and increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3704, "fingerprint": "2018|201800247|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800247|MARIN", "content_hash": "03e46f5432b4dda2", "measure_id": "201800247", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure continuing the special tax for paramedic services for four years in the amount of $79.50 in the first year and increasing $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in nonresidential use, which will annually raise approximately $81,500 each year, and increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 899, "no_votes": 229, "total_votes": 1128, "percent_yes": 79.69858156028369, "percent_no": 20.301418439716315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues a special property tax for paramedic services in Marin...", "summary_text": "This measure continues a special property tax for paramedic services in Marin County for four years, starting at $79.50 per taxable living unit in the first year and increasing by $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50. The tax is expected to raise approximately $81,500 annually and applies the same rate structure to nonresidential properties based on every 1,500 square feet of structure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.074548", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.539439", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure continuing the special tax for paramedic services for four years in the amount of $79.50 in the first year and increasing $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in nonresidential use, which will annually raise approximately $81,500 each year, and increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3705, "fingerprint": "2018|201800248|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800248|MARIN", "content_hash": "3f5b6a488ea01e2f", "measure_id": "201800248", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure continuing the special tax for paramedic services for four years in the amount of $79.50 in the first year and increasing $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in nonresidential use, which will annually raise approximately $472,000 beginning in year one, and increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4737, "no_votes": 1657, "total_votes": 6394, "percent_yes": 74.08507976227713, "percent_no": 25.914920237722868, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continues a special property tax for paramedic services in Marin...", "summary_text": "This measure continues a special property tax for paramedic services in Marin County for four years, starting at $79.50 per taxable living unit in the first year and increasing by $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50. The tax is expected to raise approximately $472,000 annually beginning in the first year.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.074809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.539635", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure continuing the special tax for paramedic services for four years in the amount of $79.50 in the first year and increasing $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in nonresidential use, which will annually raise approximately $472,000 beginning in year one, and increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3697, "fingerprint": "2018|201800041|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800041|MARIN", "content_hash": "addd95c372629ac1", "measure_id": "201800041", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure continuing the special tax for paramedic services for four years in the amount of $79.50 in the first year and increasing $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in nonresidential use, which will annually raise approximately $58,000 beginning in year one, and increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 614, "no_votes": 262, "total_votes": 876, "percent_yes": 70.09132420091323, "percent_no": 29.908675799086765, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continued a special property tax for paramedic services in Marin...", "summary_text": "This measure continued a special property tax for paramedic services in Marin County for four years, starting at $79.50 per taxable living unit in the first year and increasing by $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50. The tax was expected to raise approximately $58,000 annually beginning in the first year.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.072356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.538059", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure continuing the special tax for paramedic services for four years in the amount of $79.50 in the first year and increasing $4 annually to a maximum of $91.50 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in nonresidential use, which will annually raise approximately $58,000 beginning in year one, and increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3696, "fingerprint": "2018|201800040|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800040|MARIN", "content_hash": "f4af79b0371f2d65", "measure_id": "201800040", "measure_letter": "RM3", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48090, "no_votes": 31366, "total_votes": 79456, "percent_yes": 60.52406363270237, "percent_no": 39.47593636729763, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized a plan to improve Bay Area public transportation and ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized a plan to improve Bay Area public transportation and reduce traffic congestion by implementing three $1 toll increases on Bay Area bridges (excluding the Golden Gate Bridge) in 2019, 2022, and 2025. The funds would be used to enhance bus, ferry, BART, and commuter rail services with independent oversight of expenditures.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.072093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.537851", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3713, "fingerprint": "2018|201800043|MARIPOSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800043|MARIPOSA", "content_hash": "ff7fbeb9cd6fb980", "measure_id": "201800043", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Mariposa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To reduce the threat of wildfires; enhance fire protection and 911 emergency response; maintain law enforcement; repair damaged roads; protect water quality, open space; retain and attract jobs and businesses; and other general services, shall Mariposa County\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax paid only by hotel/short-term rental guests be increased by 2%, providing $3,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4840, "no_votes": 3258, "total_votes": 8098, "percent_yes": 59.767843912077055, "percent_no": 40.232156087922945, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Mariposa County's transient occupancy tax (paid by hot...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Mariposa County's transient occupancy tax (paid by hotel and short-term rental guests) by 2% to generate approximately $3 million annually for various county services including fire protection, emergency response, law enforcement, road repairs, and water quality protection. The tax increase requires independent audits and can only be ended by voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.077174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.541212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce the threat of wildfires; enhance fire protection and 911 emergency response; maintain law enforcement; repair damaged roads; protect water quality, open space; retain and attract jobs and businesses; and other general services, shall Mariposa County\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax paid only by hotel/short-term rental guests be increased by 2%, providing $3,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mariposa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3714, "fingerprint": "2018|201800251|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800251|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "33b7076e8fb0f3bf", "measure_id": "201800251", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to enact a three-eights (3/8th) of a cent general purpose transactions and use tax to provide the City with an estimated $623,000 per year for a limited period of fifteen years be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1106, "no_votes": 1174, "total_votes": 2280, "percent_yes": 48.50877192982456, "percent_no": 51.49122807017544, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have enacted a 0.375% general purpose sales tax in Mendocino for 15 years, generating an estimated $623,000 annually for city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.077496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.541418", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to enact a three-eights (3/8th) of a cent general purpose transactions and use tax to provide the City with an estimated $623,000 per year for a limited period of fifteen years be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3715, "fingerprint": "2018|201800252|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800252|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "a74d2c3e48929d99", "measure_id": "201800252", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City of Willits tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $250,000 to $400,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1156, "no_votes": 392, "total_votes": 1548, "percent_yes": 74.67700258397933, "percent_no": 25.32299741602067, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the City of Willits to impose annual taxes on cannabis...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the City of Willits to impose annual taxes on cannabis businesses at rates up to $10 per square foot for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis operations. The tax was expected to generate $250,000 to $400,000 annually for general municipal expenses including police, fire, roads, and recreation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.077762", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.541610", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City of Willits tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $250,000 to $400,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3716, "fingerprint": "2018|201800572|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800572|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "87f7e053a41c482a", "measure_id": "201800572", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; construct a gymnasium for school and community use that meets health, safety, and handicapped accessibility requirements; shall Round Valley Unified School District issue $4,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $272,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 386, "no_votes": 212, "total_votes": 598, "percent_yes": 64.54849498327759, "percent_no": 35.45150501672241, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized Round Valley Unified School District to issue $4", "summary_text": "The measure authorized Round Valley Unified School District to issue $4.5 million in bonds to construct a gymnasium that meets health, safety, and accessibility requirements for school and community use. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 6 cents per $100 of assessed value, generating an average of $272,000 annually until paid off.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.078076", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.541802", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; construct a gymnasium for school and community use that meets health, safety, and handicapped accessibility requirements; shall Round Valley Unified School District issue $4,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $272,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3718, "fingerprint": "2018|201800254|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800254|MERCED", "content_hash": "a174ff96db763ff9", "measure_id": "201800254", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance authorizing the City Council of the City of Atwater to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses and dispensaries, to help fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4445, "no_votes": 2365, "total_votes": 6810, "percent_yes": 65.27165932452276, "percent_no": 34.72834067547724, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City Council of Atwater to impose a business lice...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City Council of Atwater to impose a business license tax of up to 15% of gross receipts on cannabis businesses and dispensaries to fund general municipal services. The tax revenue would go toward the city's general fund rather than being designated for specific programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.078732", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.542189", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance authorizing the City Council of the City of Atwater to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses and dispensaries, to help fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3719, "fingerprint": "2018|201800255|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800255|MERCED", "content_hash": "af9debff0d832f1c", "measure_id": "201800255", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure making the office of Atwater City Clerk appointive by the City Council, rather than elected, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4789, "no_votes": 1899, "total_votes": 6688, "percent_yes": 71.60586124401914, "percent_no": 28.394138755980862, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the Atwater City Clerk position from an elected office t...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the Atwater City Clerk position from an elected office to one appointed by the City Council. The measure was approved by voters, transferring the selection of the City Clerk from public election to City Council appointment.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.078991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.542382", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure making the office of Atwater City Clerk appointive by the City Council, rather than elected, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3720, "fingerprint": "2018|201800256|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800256|MERCED", "content_hash": "c369770c26cecacb", "measure_id": "201800256", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Atwater adopt an ordinance to increase the City\u2019s transient occupancy tax from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%), to generate an additional $10,000 annually from hotel and other rental guests, with all funds to be collected only for the City of Atwater to fund general City services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3734, "no_votes": 3073, "total_votes": 6807, "percent_yes": 54.85529601880417, "percent_no": 45.14470398119583, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased Atwater's transient occupancy tax from 8% to 10% on hot...", "summary_text": "The measure increased Atwater's transient occupancy tax from 8% to 10% on hotel and other short-term rental guests. The tax increase was estimated to generate an additional $10,000 annually for general city services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.079255", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.542573", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Atwater adopt an ordinance to increase the City\u2019s transient occupancy tax from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%), to generate an additional $10,000 annually from hotel and other rental guests, with all funds to be collected only for the City of Atwater to fund general City services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3721, "fingerprint": "2018|201800257|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800257|MERCED", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "201800257", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 646, "no_votes": 639, "total_votes": 1285, "percent_yes": 50.27237354085603, "percent_no": 49.72762645914397, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.079569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.542772", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3724, "fingerprint": "2018|201800574|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800574|MERCED", "content_hash": "9b76e9a3fcd7309f", "measure_id": "201800574", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Atwater Elementary School District issue $20 million in bonds at legal rates to relieve overcrowding and reduce class sizes by building a new school and, if funds remain, improve existing classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, HVAC, electrical, and safety/security systems, raising an average of approximately $1.4 million annually to repay issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all money benefitting District schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4516, "no_votes": 3037, "total_votes": 7553, "percent_yes": 59.79081159804052, "percent_no": 40.20918840195948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Atwater Elementary School District to issue $20 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Atwater Elementary School District to issue $20 million in bonds to build a new school to address overcrowding and potentially make improvements to existing facilities' infrastructure and safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through property tax levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.080450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.543366", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Atwater Elementary School District issue $20 million in bonds at legal rates to relieve overcrowding and reduce class sizes by building a new school and, if funds remain, improve existing classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, HVAC, electrical, and safety/security systems, raising an average of approximately $1.4 million annually to repay issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all money benefitting District schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3725, "fingerprint": "2018|201800575|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800575|MERCED", "content_hash": "9079235fc5aeb4d6", "measure_id": "201800575", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities to improve the quality of education, make health/safety improvements, and construct an elementary school to relieve student overcrowding, shall Hilmar Unified School District issue $31,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, averaging approximately $1,700,000 annually while the bonds are outstanding at a projected average tax rate of 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1563, "no_votes": 992, "total_votes": 2555, "percent_yes": 61.17416829745597, "percent_no": 38.82583170254403, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Hilmar Unified School District to issue $31 million i...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Hilmar Unified School District to issue $31 million in bonds to modernize classrooms and facilities, make health and safety improvements, and construct an elementary school to address overcrowding. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at a projected average rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.080772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.543569", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities to improve the quality of education, make health/safety improvements, and construct an elementary school to relieve student overcrowding, shall Hilmar Unified School District issue $31,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, averaging approximately $1,700,000 annually while the bonds are outstanding at a projected average tax rate of 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3722, "fingerprint": "2018|201800258|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800258|MERCED", "content_hash": "da01e23a6f5e9cf1", "measure_id": "201800258", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain fiscal stability; neighborhood police patrols; police/firefighter recruitment/retention; rapid emergency/medical response times; anti-gang/youth violence prevention programs; pothole/road repairs; answer 911 calls; prevent theft, property, burglary, robbery, auto-related crimes; essential City services; shall the measure be adopted approving an ordinance establishing a half-cent sales tax, raising approximately \r\n$2,500,000 annually for 15 years, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, and all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5542, "no_votes": 2774, "total_votes": 8316, "percent_yes": 66.64261664261664, "percent_no": 33.357383357383355, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established a half-cent sales tax in Merced for 15 years, generat...", "summary_text": "The measure established a half-cent sales tax in Merced for 15 years, generating approximately $2.5 million annually to fund police and fire services, emergency response, road repairs, crime prevention programs, and other city services. The measure included provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits to ensure funds are spent locally.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.079872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.542963", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain fiscal stability; neighborhood police patrols; police/firefighter recruitment/retention; rapid emergency/medical response times; anti-gang/youth violence prevention programs; pothole/road repairs; answer 911 calls; prevent theft, property, burglary, robbery, auto-related crimes; essential City services; shall the measure be adopted approving an ordinance establishing a half-cent sales tax, raising approximately \r\n$2,500,000 annually for 15 years, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, and all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3723, "fingerprint": "2018|201800573|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800573|MERCED", "content_hash": "09bc266477abe2ca", "measure_id": "201800573", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without raising current tax rates and to repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, upgrade classrooms/labs/facilities for science, technology, engineering, math, and career training, improve student safety/security, and construct new school facilities to relieve overcrowding, shall Los Banos Unified School District issue $65,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising on average 4.3 cents/$100 of assessed value ($3,800,000 annually) for approximately 35 years, to improve local schools, with independent audits, citizen oversight and all funds locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3593, "no_votes": 1485, "total_votes": 5078, "percent_yes": 70.75620322961797, "percent_no": 29.243796770382033, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Los Banos Unified School District to issue $65 mi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Los Banos Unified School District to issue $65 million in bonds to repair deteriorating infrastructure, upgrade classrooms and labs for STEM and career training, improve safety and security, and construct new facilities to address overcrowding. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging 4.3 cents per $100 of assessed value over approximately 35 years.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.080137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.543168", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without raising current tax rates and to repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, upgrade classrooms/labs/facilities for science, technology, engineering, math, and career training, improve student safety/security, and construct new school facilities to relieve overcrowding, shall Los Banos Unified School District issue $65,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising on average 4.3 cents/$100 of assessed value ($3,800,000 annually) for approximately 35 years, to improve local schools, with independent audits, citizen oversight and all funds locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3717, "fingerprint": "2018|201800253|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800253|MERCED", "content_hash": "6a713d780165d4a2", "measure_id": "201800253", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Generating approximately $1,000,000 annually locally to fund Merced Police, Fire, Parks, Recreation services such as 911 emergency response; neighborhood-based policing; fire/gang prevention services; skilled police officers and firefighters; and safe, clean parks; shall the City of Merced adopt an ordinance authorizing an annual commercial cannabis business tax of up to: $25 per square foot of cultivation space, or 10% of gross receipts until ended by voters, with independent citizens oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7371, "no_votes": 2146, "total_votes": 9517, "percent_yes": 77.45087737732479, "percent_no": 22.549122622675213, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Merced to impose an annual tax on commerc...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Merced to impose an annual tax on commercial cannabis businesses of up to $25 per square foot of cultivation space or 10% of gross receipts. The tax was expected to generate approximately $1 million annually to fund police, fire, parks, and recreation services, with independent citizens oversight and the ability for voters to end the tax in the future.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.078393", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.541996", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Generating approximately $1,000,000 annually locally to fund Merced Police, Fire, Parks, Recreation services such as 911 emergency response; neighborhood-based policing; fire/gang prevention services; skilled police officers and firefighters; and safe, clean parks; shall the City of Merced adopt an ordinance authorizing an annual commercial cannabis business tax of up to: $25 per square foot of cultivation space, or 10% of gross receipts until ended by voters, with independent citizens oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3726, "fingerprint": "2018|201800259|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800259|MODOC", "content_hash": "eff4f9d32255f7d4", "measure_id": "201800259", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer, which is currently an elected position, be converted to an appointed position to be filled by City Council appointment commencing upon the expiration of the term of the current City Treasurer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 203, "no_votes": 648, "total_votes": 851, "percent_yes": 23.85428907168037, "percent_no": 76.14571092831963, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the City Treasurer position from an elected o...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the City Treasurer position from an elected office to one appointed by the City Council, with the change taking effect when the current treasurer's term expired.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.081036", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.543773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer, which is currently an elected position, be converted to an appointed position to be filled by City Council appointment commencing upon the expiration of the term of the current City Treasurer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3727, "fingerprint": "2018|201800260|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800260|MODOC", "content_hash": "55711d18473a92a7", "measure_id": "201800260", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk, which is currently an elected position, be converted to an appointed position to be filled by City Council appointment commencing upon the expiration of the term of the current City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 212, "no_votes": 627, "total_votes": 839, "percent_yes": 25.26817640047676, "percent_no": 74.73182359952324, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the City Clerk position in Modoc from an elec...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the City Clerk position in Modoc from an elected office to one appointed by the City Council, beginning when the current elected clerk's term expires.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.081331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.543967", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk, which is currently an elected position, be converted to an appointed position to be filled by City Council appointment commencing upon the expiration of the term of the current City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3728, "fingerprint": "2018|201800261|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800261|MODOC", "content_hash": "80d1d9760c476478", "measure_id": "201800261", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to provide funding supplemental to city general funds for fire protection, law enforcement, and nuisance abatement purposes, shall the City of Alturas enact a one-half percent sales tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 398, "no_votes": 452, "total_votes": 850, "percent_yes": 46.82352941176471, "percent_no": 53.17647058823529, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have enacted a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have enacted a 0.5% sales tax in the City of Alturas to provide supplemental funding for fire protection, law enforcement, and nuisance abatement services beyond what the city's general fund provides.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.081657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.544161", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide funding supplemental to city general funds for fire protection, law enforcement, and nuisance abatement purposes, shall the City of Alturas enact a one-half percent sales tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3732, "fingerprint": "2018|201800576|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800576|MONO", "content_hash": "9b43356d5b5e98d9", "measure_id": "201800576", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and improve aging classrooms/schools, including deteriorating roofs, enhance safety/technology infrastructure, improve energy efficiency, construct and equip science labs, classrooms, school facilities, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Mammoth Unified School District issue $63.1 million in bonds, with legal rates, estimated repayment amounts averaging $3,675,000 raised annually for approximately 33 years, projected tax rates of 4 to 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, independent citizens' oversight, audits, and no money for operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1245, "no_votes": 739, "total_votes": 1984, "percent_yes": 62.75201612903226, "percent_no": 37.24798387096774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized Mammoth Unified School District to issue $63", "summary_text": "The measure authorized Mammoth Unified School District to issue $63.1 million in bonds to renovate aging classrooms and schools, upgrade safety and technology infrastructure, improve energy efficiency, and construct new science labs and facilities. The bonds would be repaid over approximately 33 years through property taxes at projected rates of 4 to 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.082765", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.544930", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and improve aging classrooms/schools, including deteriorating roofs, enhance safety/technology infrastructure, improve energy efficiency, construct and equip science labs, classrooms, school facilities, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Mammoth Unified School District issue $63.1 million in bonds, with legal rates, estimated repayment amounts averaging $3,675,000 raised annually for approximately 33 years, projected tax rates of 4 to 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, independent citizens' oversight, audits, and no money for operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3731, "fingerprint": "2018|201800262|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800262|MONO", "content_hash": "8b05b86286413251", "measure_id": "201800262", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general Town core services such as police, recreation, and road maintenance, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a business license tax of up to 8% for cannabis retail businesses and up to 4% for all other cannabis businesses (cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, testing), to raise an estimated $99,550-$261,708 per year, levied until voters change or repeal it?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1276, "no_votes": 291, "total_votes": 1567, "percent_yes": 81.42948308870453, "percent_no": 18.57051691129547, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a business license tax of up to 8% on cannabis retail bu...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a business license tax of up to 8% on cannabis retail businesses and up to 4% on other cannabis businesses (cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, testing) in Mono, California. The tax was projected to generate $99,550-$261,708 annually to fund general town services including police, recreation, and road maintenance.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.082503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.544739", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general Town core services such as police, recreation, and road maintenance, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a business license tax of up to 8% for cannabis retail businesses and up to 4% for all other cannabis businesses (cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, testing), to raise an estimated $99,550-$261,708 per year, levied until voters change or repeal it?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3730, "fingerprint": "2018|201800045|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800045|MONO", "content_hash": "525b8e738ea47898", "measure_id": "201800045", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "For unrestricted general revenue purposes, such as to fund Sheriff, EMS, and Code Compliance, shall the County tax cannabis businesses within the unincorporated areas up to $3.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable after 6-1-2021 for inflation), 8% of gross receipts for retail, 2.5% for testing laboratories, and 4% for other cannabis businesses; estimated to generate $143,000 to $330,000 annually; to be levied until repealed by the voters or the County YES Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2547, "no_votes": 667, "total_votes": 3214, "percent_yes": 79.24704418170504, "percent_no": 20.752955818294964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes Mono County to tax cannabis businesses in unincorpora...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes Mono County to tax cannabis businesses in unincorporated areas at rates of up to $3.00 per square foot for cultivation, 8% of gross receipts for retail, 2.5% for testing labs, and 4% for other cannabis businesses. The tax is estimated to generate $143,000 to $330,000 annually for general county purposes including Sheriff, EMS, and Code Compliance services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.082213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.544547", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For unrestricted general revenue purposes, such as to fund Sheriff, EMS, and Code Compliance, shall the County tax cannabis businesses within the unincorporated areas up to $3.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable after 6-1-2021 for inflation), 8% of gross receipts for retail, 2.5% for testing laboratories, and 4% for other cannabis businesses; estimated to generate $143,000 to $330,000 annually; to be levied until repealed by the voters or the County YES Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3729, "fingerprint": "2018|201800044|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800044|MONO", "content_hash": "1c3214b89a8c31c4", "measure_id": "201800044", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Mendocino County Code Chapter 5.20 be amended to authorize collection of a Transient Occupancy Tax on short-term visitor accommodations of 30 days or less in private campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, estimated to raise $1,000,000 annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8794, "no_votes": 10114, "total_votes": 18908, "percent_yes": 46.50941400465411, "percent_no": 53.49058599534589, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended Mendocino County Code to impose a transient oc...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended Mendocino County Code to impose a transient occupancy tax on short-term stays of 30 days or less at private campgrounds and RV parks, with an estimated annual revenue of $1,000,000.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.081918", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.544357", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Mendocino County Code Chapter 5.20 be amended to authorize collection of a Transient Occupancy Tax on short-term visitor accommodations of 30 days or less in private campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, estimated to raise $1,000,000 annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3743, "fingerprint": "2018|201800578|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800578|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c4c40eb6b8a220b9", "measure_id": "201800578", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate classrooms and schools including repair of leaky roofs, replacement of outdated plumbing and completion of Main Street Middle School improvements, shall Soledad Unified School District issue $25.21 million in general obligation bonds at legal rates, raising between $1.0 to $2.5 million annually for 27 years to repay bonds from tax levies estimated at 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and no projected increase in the District\u2019s current bond tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 849, "no_votes": 620, "total_votes": 1469, "percent_yes": 57.79441797140912, "percent_no": 42.20558202859088, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.086140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.547135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate classrooms and schools including repair of leaky roofs, replacement of outdated plumbing and completion of Main Street Middle School improvements, shall Soledad Unified School District issue $25.21 million in general obligation bonds at legal rates, raising between $1.0 to $2.5 million annually for 27 years to repay bonds from tax levies estimated at 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and no projected increase in the District\u2019s current bond tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3742, "fingerprint": "2018|201800577|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800577|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "de8b0c146868d6e6", "measure_id": "201800577", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/update classrooms, science labs/school facilities for 21st century learning, make essential school safety/security improvements, replace aging plumbing, gas, sewer/electrical systems, repair, acquire, construct classrooms, athletic facilities, science labs, equipment, sites/facilities, shall this Monterey Peninsula Unified School District  measure be adopted to issue $213,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy approximately 6 cents/$100 assessed value ($12,500,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11087, "no_votes": 4708, "total_votes": 15795, "percent_yes": 70.19309908198798, "percent_no": 29.80690091801202, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.085871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.546945", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/update classrooms, science labs/school facilities for 21st century learning, make essential school safety/security improvements, replace aging plumbing, gas, sewer/electrical systems, repair, acquire, construct classrooms, athletic facilities, science labs, equipment, sites/facilities, shall this Monterey Peninsula Unified School District  measure be adopted to issue $213,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy approximately 6 cents/$100 assessed value ($12,500,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3735, "fingerprint": "2018|201800265|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800265|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "0412f856a6bfe44c", "measure_id": "201800265", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure increasing the City of King\u2019s current one-half percent sales tax to one percent to generate an estimated increase of $800,000 annually for general city expenses, such as public safety and other essential services, street repairs, economic development efforts, and improving the City\u2019s overall financial solvency subject to citizen oversight, an annual audit, and expiration of the tax in 10 years be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 859, "no_votes": 674, "total_votes": 1533, "percent_yes": 56.03392041748207, "percent_no": 43.96607958251793, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure doubled the City of King's sales tax from 0", "summary_text": "The measure doubled the City of King's sales tax from 0.5% to 1% for a 10-year period to generate an estimated additional $800,000 annually for general city expenses including public safety, street repairs, and economic development. The tax increase includes provisions for citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.083684", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.545522", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure increasing the City of King\u2019s current one-half percent sales tax to one percent to generate an estimated increase of $800,000 annually for general city expenses, such as public safety and other essential services, street repairs, economic development efforts, and improving the City\u2019s overall financial solvency subject to citizen oversight, an annual audit, and expiration of the tax in 10 years be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3734, "fingerprint": "2018|201800264|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800264|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "fb573ab00721ed44", "measure_id": "201800264", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the City of King General Sales Tax Measure K passes, should the revenues be used to balance the budget in order to maintain existing services; pay off General Fund debt and establish a financial reserve; fund public safety staffing, services and projects designed to eliminate youth violence; fund improvements to street and sidewalk infrastructure; and fund downtown public improvements and other economic development efforts designed to increase businesses, jobs and visitors to King City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1038, "no_votes": 486, "total_votes": 1524, "percent_yes": 68.11023622047244, "percent_no": 31.889763779527556, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked King City voters whether revenues from a separate...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked King City voters whether revenues from a separate general sales tax measure should be allocated toward maintaining existing services, paying off debt, funding public safety and youth violence prevention programs, improving street and sidewalk infrastructure, and supporting downtown economic development projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.083328", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.545327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the City of King General Sales Tax Measure K passes, should the revenues be used to balance the budget in order to maintain existing services; pay off General Fund debt and establish a financial reserve; fund public safety staffing, services and projects designed to eliminate youth violence; fund improvements to street and sidewalk infrastructure; and fund downtown public improvements and other economic development efforts designed to increase businesses, jobs and visitors to King City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3740, "fingerprint": "2018|201800270|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800270|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7c1b50381c039a01", "measure_id": "201800270", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Pacific Grove Municipal Code Section 23.64.350 be amended to prohibit short-term rentals in residential districts outside the Coastal Zone, provide an 18-month phase-out period for existing permitted short-term rentals that become nonconforming uses under the measure, and require voter approval of any changes to the measure except with regard to the Coastal Zone or enforcement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4452, "no_votes": 3293, "total_votes": 7745, "percent_yes": 57.482246610716594, "percent_no": 42.517753389283406, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Pacific Grove's municipal code to prohibit short-term re...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Pacific Grove's municipal code to prohibit short-term rentals in residential districts outside the Coastal Zone, with an 18-month phase-out period for existing permitted rentals. It also requires voter approval for future changes to these restrictions, except for matters related to the Coastal Zone or enforcement.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.085325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.546552", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pacific Grove Municipal Code Section 23.64.350 be amended to prohibit short-term rentals in residential districts outside the Coastal Zone, provide an 18-month phase-out period for existing permitted short-term rentals that become nonconforming uses under the measure, and require voter approval of any changes to the measure except with regard to the Coastal Zone or enforcement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3736, "fingerprint": "2018|201800266|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800266|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "bfed6c4646dd6e23", "measure_id": "201800266", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To sustain and improve city services such as fire, police, road repairs & maintenance, shall the ordinance increasing the rate of the City of Marina\u2019s existing transactions & use (\u201csales\u201d) tax from 1% to 1.5% estimated to generate approximately $4,890,000 annually as compared with $3,260,000 for the current tax and extending the expiration date for the tax to March 31, 2034 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3334, "no_votes": 3162, "total_votes": 6496, "percent_yes": 51.32389162561576, "percent_no": 48.67610837438424, "passed": null, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would increase Marina's sales tax rate from 1% to 1", "summary_text": "This measure would increase Marina's sales tax rate from 1% to 1.5% and extend the tax until March 31, 2034, generating an estimated $4.89 million annually for city services including fire, police, and road maintenance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.083977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.545739", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To sustain and improve city services such as fire, police, road repairs & maintenance, shall the ordinance increasing the rate of the City of Marina\u2019s existing transactions & use (\u201csales\u201d) tax from 1% to 1.5% estimated to generate approximately $4,890,000 annually as compared with $3,260,000 for the current tax and extending the expiration date for the tax to March 31, 2034 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3733, "fingerprint": "2018|201800263|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800263|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a15a0221ab050b94", "measure_id": "201800263", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Gonzales increase its Temporary Transaction and Use Tax from one-half percent (0.5%) to one percent (1%), and extend the life of the tax from ten to twenty years, subject to continued independent audit and citizens\u2019 oversight committee review, with all funds being used exclusively for Gonzales programs, initiatives and projects?  The tax amendment would generate an estimated additional $550,000 annually.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 732, "no_votes": 876, "total_votes": 1608, "percent_yes": 45.52238805970149, "percent_no": 54.47761194029851, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have increased Gonzales' temporary sales tax from 0", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have increased Gonzales' temporary sales tax from 0.5% to 1% and extended its duration from ten to twenty years, with funds designated exclusively for city programs and projects. The change was estimated to generate an additional $550,000 annually and would have remained subject to independent audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.083031", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.545127", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Gonzales increase its Temporary Transaction and Use Tax from one-half percent (0.5%) to one percent (1%), and extend the life of the tax from ten to twenty years, subject to continued independent audit and citizens\u2019 oversight committee review, with all funds being used exclusively for Gonzales programs, initiatives and projects?  The tax amendment would generate an estimated additional $550,000 annually.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3737, "fingerprint": "2018|201800267|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800267|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "2e12da41470e12af", "measure_id": "201800267", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To sustain and improve city services such as fire, police, road repairs & maintenance, shall the ordinance increasing the rate of the City of Marina\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax (\u201chotel tax\u201d) from 12% to 14% estimated to generate approximately $3,733,000 annually as compared with $3,200,000 for the current tax and to continue until repealed by the voters be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4452, "no_votes": 2046, "total_votes": 6498, "percent_yes": 68.51338873499539, "percent_no": 31.486611265004612, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Marina's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 12% ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Marina's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 12% to 14%, with the additional revenue estimated to generate approximately $533,000 more annually for city services including fire, police, and road maintenance. The tax continues until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.084409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.545953", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To sustain and improve city services such as fire, police, road repairs & maintenance, shall the ordinance increasing the rate of the City of Marina\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax (\u201chotel tax\u201d) from 12% to 14% estimated to generate approximately $3,733,000 annually as compared with $3,200,000 for the current tax and to continue until repealed by the voters be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3744, "fingerprint": "2018|201800579|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800579|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "ec4657e91a963af5", "measure_id": "201800579", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade emergency communication systems, safety door locks, security cameras, lighting, repair deteriorating classrooms, restrooms, replace outdated/unsafe portables, electrical wiring, earthquake retrofit classrooms/buildings, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities/equipment, shall this South Monterey County Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $20,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents/$100 assessed valuation, raising approximately $1,400,000 annually  for local schools while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizen oversight, audits, without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3612, "no_votes": 2370, "total_votes": 5982, "percent_yes": 60.38114343029088, "percent_no": 39.61885656970912, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.086404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.547335", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade emergency communication systems, safety door locks, security cameras, lighting, repair deteriorating classrooms, restrooms, replace outdated/unsafe portables, electrical wiring, earthquake retrofit classrooms/buildings, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities/equipment, shall this South Monterey County Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $20,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents/$100 assessed valuation, raising approximately $1,400,000 annually  for local schools while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizen oversight, audits, without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3745, "fingerprint": "2018|201800580|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800580|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f492acc762cbeed0", "measure_id": "201800580", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade academic, vocational/agriculture education classrooms, replace outdated science, technology/computer labs, provide classrooms for technology careers, remove hazardous materials like asbestos/lead paint, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities/equipment, shall this South Monterey County Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $20,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2-cents/$100 assessed valuation, approximately $1,400,000 annually for local schools while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizen oversight, audits, without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3643, "no_votes": 2333, "total_votes": 5976, "percent_yes": 60.96050870147256, "percent_no": 39.03949129852744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.086723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.547600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade academic, vocational/agriculture education classrooms, replace outdated science, technology/computer labs, provide classrooms for technology careers, remove hazardous materials like asbestos/lead paint, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities/equipment, shall this South Monterey County Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $20,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2-cents/$100 assessed valuation, approximately $1,400,000 annually for local schools while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizen oversight, audits, without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3739, "fingerprint": "2018|201800269|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800269|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "4e9b974b13b35928", "measure_id": "201800269", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing the existing one cent per dollar transaction and use (\u201csales\u201d) tax, shall the measure be adopted to continue the tax for eight years to fix streets, sidewalks, and potholes; improve access and safety for senior citizens, disabled residents, and others; and repair the storm drain system to protect our beaches/Monterey Bay, with all revenue exclusively applied to these specific purposes, subject to citizen oversight and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8669, "no_votes": 1892, "total_votes": 10561, "percent_yes": 82.08502982672096, "percent_no": 17.914970173279045, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure continued an existing one-cent sales tax for eight years to fund...", "summary_text": "This measure continued an existing one-cent sales tax for eight years to fund street repairs, sidewalk improvements, accessibility enhancements, and storm drain system repairs in Monterey. The revenue would be subject to citizen oversight and independent audits to ensure funds are used exclusively for the specified infrastructure purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.084995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.546350", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the existing one cent per dollar transaction and use (\u201csales\u201d) tax, shall the measure be adopted to continue the tax for eight years to fix streets, sidewalks, and potholes; improve access and safety for senior citizens, disabled residents, and others; and repair the storm drain system to protect our beaches/Monterey Bay, with all revenue exclusively applied to these specific purposes, subject to citizen oversight and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3741, "fingerprint": "2018|201800271|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800271|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f5a3f851aae6e70f", "measure_id": "201800271", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the Pacific Grove Municipal Code be adopted to increase the City of Pacific Grove\u2019s Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), effective July 1, 2019, imposed on occupants of short-term rentals such as hotel rooms, from 10% to 12%, and apply TOT to total rent paid by a guest for the short-term rental, including online travel companies, which is anticipated to raise $1,135,000 annually and will continue until repealed by City Council or City voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5662, "no_votes": 1974, "total_votes": 7636, "percent_yes": 74.14876898899948, "percent_no": 25.85123101100052, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.085602", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.546742", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the Pacific Grove Municipal Code be adopted to increase the City of Pacific Grove\u2019s Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), effective July 1, 2019, imposed on occupants of short-term rentals such as hotel rooms, from 10% to 12%, and apply TOT to total rent paid by a guest for the short-term rental, including online travel companies, which is anticipated to raise $1,135,000 annually and will continue until repealed by City Council or City voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3738, "fingerprint": "2018|201800268|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800268|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "228e483231da1927", "measure_id": "201800268", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance permitting operation in the City of Marina of certain cannabis businesses and establishing a business license tax for such businesses at rates not to exceed 5% of gross receipts, to continue until repealed by the voters and, according to proponents, potentially generating $40,000 to $200,000 annually be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4351, "no_votes": 2130, "total_votes": 6481, "percent_yes": 67.13470143496374, "percent_no": 32.865298565036255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure permits certain cannabis businesses to operate in Marina, Califo...", "summary_text": "This measure permits certain cannabis businesses to operate in Marina, California and establishes a business license tax on those businesses at rates up to 5% of gross receipts. The tax would continue indefinitely until repealed by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.084685", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.546153", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance permitting operation in the City of Marina of certain cannabis businesses and establishing a business license tax for such businesses at rates not to exceed 5% of gross receipts, to continue until repealed by the voters and, according to proponents, potentially generating $40,000 to $200,000 annually be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3747, "fingerprint": "2018|201800047|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800047|NAPA", "content_hash": "cf09f38e258ce16e", "measure_id": "201800047", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 2018-01 be adopted? (Amending the Napa County General Plan and zoning code creating water quality buffer zones within the Agricultural Watershed (AW) zoning district and restricting tree removal within those zones; strengthening oak removal remediation standards and establishing a permit program for oak tree removal once 795 acres of oak woodland have been removed.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17533, "no_votes": 18174, "total_votes": 35707, "percent_yes": 49.10241689304618, "percent_no": 50.89758310695382, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.087276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.548091", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 2018-01 be adopted? (Amending the Napa County General Plan and zoning code creating water quality buffer zones within the Agricultural Watershed (AW) zoning district and restricting tree removal within those zones; strengthening oak removal remediation standards and establishing a permit program for oak tree removal once 795 acres of oak woodland have been removed.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11203, "fingerprint": "2018|201800273|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800273|NAPA", "content_hash": "58fbe24a5425a5f9", "measure_id": "201800273", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase, improve and preserve affordable and workforce housing in the City of Calistoga, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less, increasing the maximum hotel rate from twelve percent (12%) to thirteen percent (13%), with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $512,325 annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1389, "no_votes": 355, "total_votes": 1744, "percent_yes": 79.64449541284404, "percent_no": 20.355504587155963, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.568119", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.088389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.548869", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase, improve and preserve affordable and workforce housing in the City of Calistoga, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less, increasing the maximum hotel rate from twelve percent (12%) to thirteen percent (13%), with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $512,325 annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3748, "fingerprint": "2018|201800048|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800048|NAPA", "content_hash": "58f29f4c5a2fe8a5", "measure_id": "201800048", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 2018-02 be adopted? (Amending Napa County Code Section 18.120.010 to disallow the use of personal airports and helipads and to limit the circumstances under which helicopter takeoffs and landings in support of direct agricultural activities may take place.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21442, "no_votes": 13779, "total_votes": 35221, "percent_yes": 60.87845319553675, "percent_no": 39.12154680446325, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.087544", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.548285", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 2018-02 be adopted? (Amending Napa County Code Section 18.120.010 to disallow the use of personal airports and helipads and to limit the circumstances under which helicopter takeoffs and landings in support of direct agricultural activities may take place.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3752, "fingerprint": "2018|201800275|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800275|NAPA", "content_hash": "c0211c2e539d4190", "measure_id": "201800275", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing in the City of St. Helena, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $279,000 annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2112, "no_votes": 501, "total_votes": 2613, "percent_yes": 80.82663605051664, "percent_no": 19.17336394948336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) in St", "summary_text": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) in St. Helena from 12% to 13% on stays of 30 days or less. All revenue from the 1% increase, estimated at $279,000 annually, is restricted to funding affordable and workforce housing programs and services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.088916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.549252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing in the City of St. Helena, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $279,000 annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3751, "fingerprint": "2018|201800274|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800274|NAPA", "content_hash": "762776ed21c0c9ca", "measure_id": "201800274", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing in the City of Napa, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $2,100,000 annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21263, "no_votes": 8241, "total_votes": 29504, "percent_yes": 72.06819414316703, "percent_no": 27.931805856832966, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.088657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.549062", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing in the City of Napa, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $2,100,000 annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3750, "fingerprint": "2018|201800272|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800272|NAPA", "content_hash": "2946966252596858", "measure_id": "201800272", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing in the City of American Canyon, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $140,000 annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable workforce housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4322, "no_votes": 2186, "total_votes": 6508, "percent_yes": 66.41057160417947, "percent_no": 33.58942839582053, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.088128", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.548680", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing in the City of American Canyon, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $140,000 annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable workforce housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3749, "fingerprint": "2018|201800049|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800049|NAPA", "content_hash": "30da96e2eeb30d13", "measure_id": "201800049", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2018-__ be enacted? (To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing in Napa County, the Ordinance would increase the existing transient occupancy tax on hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less in the unincorporated area from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the 1% increase (estimated: $1.1 million annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37767, "no_votes": 16112, "total_votes": 53879, "percent_yes": 70.09595575270512, "percent_no": 29.904044247294877, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.087812", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.548479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2018-__ be enacted? (To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing in Napa County, the Ordinance would increase the existing transient occupancy tax on hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less in the unincorporated area from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the 1% increase (estimated: $1.1 million annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3753, "fingerprint": "2018|201800276|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800276|NAPA", "content_hash": "a3d1e46ebb83b4b4", "measure_id": "201800276", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to fully utilize TOT and sales tax generated from visitors for public services, parks & recreation, police and fire emergency programs, shall the appropriations limit set by Article 13B of the California Constitution be increased by $3,000,000 and increase annually by the growth in TOT each year for a four year period commencing fiscal year 2018/19? By approving this appropriation limit, no new taxes are created nor will any existing tax be increased.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1044, "no_votes": 277, "total_votes": 1321, "percent_yes": 79.03103709311128, "percent_no": 20.96896290688872, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.089176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.549451", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to fully utilize TOT and sales tax generated from visitors for public services, parks & recreation, police and fire emergency programs, shall the appropriations limit set by Article 13B of the California Constitution be increased by $3,000,000 and increase annually by the growth in TOT each year for a four year period commencing fiscal year 2018/19? By approving this appropriation limit, no new taxes are created nor will any existing tax be increased.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3746, "fingerprint": "2018|201800046|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800046|NAPA", "content_hash": "f4af79b0371f2d65", "measure_id": "201800046", "measure_letter": "RM3", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17350, "no_votes": 16828, "total_votes": 34178, "percent_yes": 50.76364913101995, "percent_no": 49.23635086898005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.086988", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.547808", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3754, "fingerprint": "2018|201800277|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800277|NAPA", "content_hash": "a85a3a5ef299e3f4", "measure_id": "201800277", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing that benefits Yountville, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $650,000 annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1003, "no_votes": 348, "total_votes": 1351, "percent_yes": 74.24130273871206, "percent_no": 25.758697261287935, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.089435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.549641", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing that benefits Yountville, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $650,000 annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3759, "fingerprint": "2018|201800582|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800582|NEVADA", "content_hash": "4c8d80fefcb333cc", "measure_id": "201800582", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure all students receive a well-rounded, high quality education to prepare them for college, university and careers; maintain and prevent cuts in science, technology, music, art, honors and career/job training programs, shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District renew and increase its expiring parcel tax at the rate of $148 generating $5,600,000 annually for 9 years; requiring citizens oversight, independent audits, senior exemptions, and funds used in Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6321, "no_votes": 1717, "total_votes": 8038, "percent_yes": 78.63896491664593, "percent_no": 21.361035083354068, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.090885", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.550621", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure all students receive a well-rounded, high quality education to prepare them for college, university and careers; maintain and prevent cuts in science, technology, music, art, honors and career/job training programs, shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District renew and increase its expiring parcel tax at the rate of $148 generating $5,600,000 annually for 9 years; requiring citizens oversight, independent audits, senior exemptions, and funds used in Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3758, "fingerprint": "2018|201800581|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800581|NEVADA", "content_hash": "f909f72833d34704", "measure_id": "201800581", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging classrooms / leaky roofs / old facilities, and provide a safe, quality learning environment for current and future students, shall Grass Valley Elementary School District\u2019s measure to issue $18.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with projected tax rates of 2.4\u00a2 per $100 of assessed property valuation while bonds are outstanding (averaging approximately $1.05 million annually), and requiring audits / oversight, all funds spent locally on elementary / middle schools, and no money for administrators' salaries / pensions be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5747, "no_votes": 3339, "total_votes": 9086, "percent_yes": 63.25115562403698, "percent_no": 36.74884437596302, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.090609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.550419", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging classrooms / leaky roofs / old facilities, and provide a safe, quality learning environment for current and future students, shall Grass Valley Elementary School District\u2019s measure to issue $18.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with projected tax rates of 2.4\u00a2 per $100 of assessed property valuation while bonds are outstanding (averaging approximately $1.05 million annually), and requiring audits / oversight, all funds spent locally on elementary / middle schools, and no money for administrators' salaries / pensions be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3756, "fingerprint": "2018|201800278|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800278|NEVADA", "content_hash": "85db36455606802c", "measure_id": "201800278", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure expand funding for such general fund purposes as increased police and fire services, enhancing parks and recreational services, and improving streets and sidewalks, with all funds staying local and all expenditures subject to an annual audit by an independent citizen oversight committee, repealing the existing \u00bd percent City transaction and use (sales) tax, and replacing it with an ongoing 1 percent sales tax, which will raise approximately $5,400.000.00 annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2320, "no_votes": 1527, "total_votes": 3847, "percent_yes": 60.30673251884585, "percent_no": 39.69326748115415, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.090067", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.550024", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure expand funding for such general fund purposes as increased police and fire services, enhancing parks and recreational services, and improving streets and sidewalks, with all funds staying local and all expenditures subject to an annual audit by an independent citizen oversight committee, repealing the existing \u00bd percent City transaction and use (sales) tax, and replacing it with an ongoing 1 percent sales tax, which will raise approximately $5,400.000.00 annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3757, "fingerprint": "2018|201800279|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800279|NEVADA", "content_hash": "b9773e101bc726f0", "measure_id": "201800279", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure of the City of Nevada City to tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses to fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, streets and recreation at annual rates not to exceed $7.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 8% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 6% for all other cannabis businesses; generating approximately $120,000 to $135,000 annually be levied until repealed by voters or the City Council, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1134, "no_votes": 216, "total_votes": 1350, "percent_yes": 84.0, "percent_no": 16.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.090335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.550227", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure of the City of Nevada City to tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses to fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, streets and recreation at annual rates not to exceed $7.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 8% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 6% for all other cannabis businesses; generating approximately $120,000 to $135,000 annually be levied until repealed by voters or the City Council, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3755, "fingerprint": "2018|201800050|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800050|NEVADA", "content_hash": "c841e23f8c474e38", "measure_id": "201800050", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain improve essential services including public safety, crime prevention/ investigation, environmental regulations enforcement, neighborhood protection, and other County services, shall the measure establishing cannabis business tax rates not to exceed $10 per square-foot or $8 per ounce on cultivation and/or up to 10% of gross receipts for all cannabis businesses in unincorporated Nevada County, generating an estimated $1.5-3,000,000 annually, unless/until repealed, with financial audits, no money for the state, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38748, "no_votes": 12650, "total_votes": 51398, "percent_yes": 75.38814739873146, "percent_no": 24.611852601268538, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.089769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.549832", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain improve essential services including public safety, crime prevention/ investigation, environmental regulations enforcement, neighborhood protection, and other County services, shall the measure establishing cannabis business tax rates not to exceed $10 per square-foot or $8 per ounce on cultivation and/or up to 10% of gross receipts for all cannabis businesses in unincorporated Nevada County, generating an estimated $1.5-3,000,000 annually, unless/until repealed, with financial audits, no money for the state, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3760, "fingerprint": "2018|201800280|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800280|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1760fc3ecc4d745c", "measure_id": "201800280", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Andrew Hamilton be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5514, "no_votes": 2139, "total_votes": 7653, "percent_yes": 72.05017640141122, "percent_no": 27.94982359858878, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-01-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.091204", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.550812", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Andrew Hamilton be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3761, "fingerprint": "2018|201800281|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800281|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4c34cd5a085127aa", "measure_id": "201800281", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, approving the \u201cCypress Town Center and Commons Specific Plan 2.0\u201d, which allows for development of a town center, single-family, senior and multi-family housing and public park space on portions of Los Alamitos Race Course, the former Cypress Golf Club and an adjacent property, with related amendments to the General Plan and the Amended and Restated Cypress Business and Professional Center Specific Plan and zone changes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6558, "no_votes": 3770, "total_votes": 10328, "percent_yes": 63.49728892331527, "percent_no": 36.50271107668473, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.091478", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.551005", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, approving the \u201cCypress Town Center and Commons Specific Plan 2.0\u201d, which allows for development of a town center, single-family, senior and multi-family housing and public park space on portions of Los Alamitos Race Course, the former Cypress Golf Club and an adjacent property, with related amendments to the General Plan and the Amended and Restated Cypress Business and Professional Center Specific Plan and zone changes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3779, "fingerprint": "2018|201800299|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800299|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2f37019c4dcd65a0", "measure_id": "201800299", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Santa Ana Charter sections 101.2 and 400 be amended requiring City Councilmember election from his or her residency ward and only by registered voters of that ward, instead of City Councilmember elections by registered voters of the entire City, with ward boundaries to be drawn as required by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35027, "no_votes": 20351, "total_votes": 55378, "percent_yes": 63.25074939506663, "percent_no": 36.74925060493337, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Santa Ana city charter to change city council electi...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Santa Ana city charter to change city council elections from citywide voting to a district-based system where council members must live in and be elected only by voters within their specific ward. The change requires ward boundaries to be drawn according to legal requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.096524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.554533", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Santa Ana Charter sections 101.2 and 400 be amended requiring City Councilmember election from his or her residency ward and only by registered voters of that ward, instead of City Councilmember elections by registered voters of the entire City, with ward boundaries to be drawn as required by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3762, "fingerprint": "2018|201800282|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800282|ORANGE", "content_hash": "cb3563f431b2e58a", "measure_id": "201800282", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 17-08, approving zone text amendments to allow for a land exchange agreement that facilitates (a) the allocation of development previously planned for the Bake Parkway Site to property near the intersection of Pusan and Irvine Blvd, and (b) the development of the State-approved site for the Southern California Veterans Cemetery on strawberry fields located near the intersection of I-5 and Bake Parkway, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17078, "no_votes": 28638, "total_votes": 45716, "percent_yes": 37.35672412284539, "percent_no": 62.64327587715461, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.091743", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.551209", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 17-08, approving zone text amendments to allow for a land exchange agreement that facilitates (a) the allocation of development previously planned for the Bake Parkway Site to property near the intersection of Pusan and Irvine Blvd, and (b) the development of the State-approved site for the Southern California Veterans Cemetery on strawberry fields located near the intersection of I-5 and Bake Parkway, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3783, "fingerprint": "2018|201800303|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800303|ORANGE", "content_hash": "32f5481372c13dd1", "measure_id": "201800303", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset significant budget cuts and state takeaways and maintain City services, including community police patrols, paramedic services, fire protection, marine safety/lifeguards, school safety, 9-1-1 response times, and other essential general services, shall an ordinance be adopted for a one percent sales tax to raise approximately $5,000,000 annually until ended by voters, with independent audits to ensure transparency and funds spent only in Seal Beach?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7867, "no_votes": 5564, "total_votes": 13431, "percent_yes": 58.5734494825404, "percent_no": 41.4265505174596, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopted a 1% sales tax in Seal Beach to generate approximately $...", "summary_text": "This measure adopted a 1% sales tax in Seal Beach to generate approximately $5 million annually for city services including police patrols, paramedic services, fire protection, lifeguards, school safety, and emergency response. The tax includes provisions for independent audits and can only be ended by voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.097650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.555303", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset significant budget cuts and state takeaways and maintain City services, including community police patrols, paramedic services, fire protection, marine safety/lifeguards, school safety, 9-1-1 response times, and other essential general services, shall an ordinance be adopted for a one percent sales tax to raise approximately $5,000,000 annually until ended by voters, with independent audits to ensure transparency and funds spent only in Seal Beach?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3763, "fingerprint": "2018|201800283|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800283|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b2cedd4c2b583d97", "measure_id": "201800283", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the Irvine City Charter to require at least a two-thirds vote of the total City Council membership in order to place City Council sponsored general or special tax proposals on a ballot for voter consideration, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34010, "no_votes": 10618, "total_votes": 44628, "percent_yes": 76.20776194317469, "percent_no": 23.792238056825312, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Irvine City Charter to require a two-thirds vote of ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Irvine City Charter to require a two-thirds vote of the total City Council membership before the Council can place any general or special tax proposals on the ballot for voters to consider.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.092036", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.551401", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the Irvine City Charter to require at least a two-thirds vote of the total City Council membership in order to place City Council sponsored general or special tax proposals on a ballot for voter consideration, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3784, "fingerprint": "2018|201800304|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800304|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e18a49afc523c36a", "measure_id": "201800304", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to provide police, fire, emergency medical and rescue protection, to prevent fires and power outages, to maintain parks and roads, and to provide other local services and improvements in the community by raising the transient occupancy tax (paid by short-term hotel and other guests) from 10% to 13% until ended by voters, providing approximately $480,000 annually, with audits, all funds only for Tustin, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14244, "no_votes": 8958, "total_votes": 23202, "percent_yes": 61.39125937419188, "percent_no": 38.60874062580812, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased Orange's transient occupancy tax from 10% to 13% on sho...", "summary_text": "The measure increased Orange's transient occupancy tax from 10% to 13% on short-term hotel and lodging stays to fund police, fire, emergency services, infrastructure maintenance, and other local services. The tax increase was projected to generate approximately $480,000 annually with required audits and funds designated solely for local use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.097912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.555500", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to provide police, fire, emergency medical and rescue protection, to prevent fires and power outages, to maintain parks and roads, and to provide other local services and improvements in the community by raising the transient occupancy tax (paid by short-term hotel and other guests) from 10% to 13% until ended by voters, providing approximately $480,000 annually, with audits, all funds only for Tustin, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3764, "fingerprint": "2018|201800284|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800284|ORANGE", "content_hash": "288980eabc03a4e2", "measure_id": "201800284", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1009 be added to the Irvine City Charter which benefits Irvine\u2019s general fund and local taxpayers by requiring that no City procedures or requirements delay important revenue streams from development projects which provide a fiscal benefit to Irvine citizens, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19478, "no_votes": 23866, "total_votes": 43344, "percent_yes": 44.93816906607604, "percent_no": 55.06183093392396, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have added a provision to the Irvine City Charter requirin...", "summary_text": "This measure would have added a provision to the Irvine City Charter requiring that no city procedures or requirements delay revenue streams from development projects that provide a fiscal benefit to the city.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.092331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.551595", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1009 be added to the Irvine City Charter which benefits Irvine\u2019s general fund and local taxpayers by requiring that no City procedures or requirements delay important revenue streams from development projects which provide a fiscal benefit to Irvine citizens, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3765, "fingerprint": "2018|201800285|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800285|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1a83321e93471d42", "measure_id": "201800285", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that changes the term of office for the mayor from a two-year term to a four-year term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7925, "no_votes": 7397, "total_votes": 15322, "percent_yes": 51.72301266153245, "percent_no": 48.27698733846755, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.092597", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.551794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that changes the term of office for the mayor from a two-year term to a four-year term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3785, "fingerprint": "2018|201800583|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800583|ORANGE", "content_hash": "006eb002689901fb", "measure_id": "201800583", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, construct, acquire classrooms, science labs, instructional technology/equipment for student achievement in math, science, arts, engineering/careers; repair/upgrade 50 year old high school classrooms/school facilities, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewer/electrical systems; improve student safety, shall this Los Alamitos Unified School District measure authorizing $97,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($6,200,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, funds for local schools only, with taxpayer oversight, no administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11280, "no_votes": 7925, "total_votes": 19205, "percent_yes": 58.734704504035406, "percent_no": 41.265295495964594, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Los Alamitos Unified School District to issue $97...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Los Alamitos Unified School District to issue $97 million in bonds to renovate and construct classrooms, science labs, and school facilities, as well as repair aging infrastructure systems. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy of approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.098177", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.555695", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, construct, acquire classrooms, science labs, instructional technology/equipment for student achievement in math, science, arts, engineering/careers; repair/upgrade 50 year old high school classrooms/school facilities, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewer/electrical systems; improve student safety, shall this Los Alamitos Unified School District measure authorizing $97,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($6,200,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, funds for local schools only, with taxpayer oversight, no administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3787, "fingerprint": "2018|201800585|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800585|ORANGE", "content_hash": "05634b5057f875af", "measure_id": "201800585", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Should term limits be implemented for the Board of Education of the Newport-Mesa Unified School District with that limit being three consecutive four-year terms, and after a Board member has served three consecutive full terms, that Board member will be permitted to serve again on the Board after having a break in service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61747, "no_votes": 11840, "total_votes": 73587, "percent_yes": 83.91020153016157, "percent_no": 16.089798469838428, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure implemented term limits for Newport-Mesa Unified School District...", "summary_text": "This measure implemented term limits for Newport-Mesa Unified School District Board of Education members, restricting them to three consecutive four-year terms before requiring a break in service to be eligible to serve again.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.098753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.556084", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should term limits be implemented for the Board of Education of the Newport-Mesa Unified School District with that limit being three consecutive four-year terms, and after a Board member has served three consecutive full terms, that Board member will be permitted to serve again on the Board after having a break in service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3788, "fingerprint": "2018|201800586|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800586|ORANGE", "content_hash": "58084e88a809140b", "measure_id": "201800586", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update classrooms, science labs and facilities that prepare students for college and careers in math, science, technology, arts and skilled trades, improve student safety and security, repair/replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems and remove asbestos; shall Santa Ana Unified School District issue $232 million in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents per $100 of assessed value ($14 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds used for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31307, "no_votes": 13008, "total_votes": 44315, "percent_yes": 70.64650795441723, "percent_no": 29.35349204558277, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Santa Ana Unified School District to issue $232 m...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Santa Ana Unified School District to issue $232 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and lab updates, safety enhancements, and infrastructure repairs. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax of 2 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.099044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.556276", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update classrooms, science labs and facilities that prepare students for college and careers in math, science, technology, arts and skilled trades, improve student safety and security, repair/replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems and remove asbestos; shall Santa Ana Unified School District issue $232 million in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents per $100 of assessed value ($14 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds used for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3767, "fingerprint": "2018|201800287|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800287|ORANGE", "content_hash": "db173d01ea53b962", "measure_id": "201800287", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Anaheim City Council Ordinance No. 6376, which would approve a Development Agreement and provide a vested right to develop a Four Diamond 580-room, eight-story hotel on property located at 1700 S. Harbor Blvd. during the five-year term of that Development Agreement in accordance with governmental approvals and entitlements granted by the City, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42349, "no_votes": 38919, "total_votes": 81268, "percent_yes": 52.11030171777329, "percent_no": 47.88969828222671, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure approved a Development Agreement giving vested rights to develop ...", "summary_text": "The measure approved a Development Agreement giving vested rights to develop a Four Diamond 580-room, eight-story hotel at 1700 S. Harbor Blvd. in Anaheim for a five-year term. The agreement allows the hotel development to proceed in accordance with city-granted approvals and entitlements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.093123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.552176", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Anaheim City Council Ordinance No. 6376, which would approve a Development Agreement and provide a vested right to develop a Four Diamond 580-room, eight-story hotel on property located at 1700 S. Harbor Blvd. during the five-year term of that Development Agreement in accordance with governmental approvals and entitlements granted by the City, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3768, "fingerprint": "2018|201800288|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800288|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1e8d99d7f66ebffc", "measure_id": "201800288", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Anaheim City Council Ordinance No. 6377, which would approve a Development Agreement and provide a vested right to develop a Four Diamond 634-room, eight-story hotel on property located at 1030 W. Katella Ave. during the five-year term of that Development Agreement in accordance with governmental approvals and entitlements granted by the City, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42378, "no_votes": 38859, "total_votes": 81237, "percent_yes": 52.16588500313897, "percent_no": 47.83411499686103, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure approved a development agreement giving vested rights to build a...", "summary_text": "This measure approved a development agreement giving vested rights to build a 634-room, eight-story Four Diamond hotel at 1030 W. Katella Ave. in Anaheim for a five-year term. The ordinance allows the hotel development to proceed according to city-granted approvals and entitlements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.093382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.552369", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Anaheim City Council Ordinance No. 6377, which would approve a Development Agreement and provide a vested right to develop a Four Diamond 634-room, eight-story hotel on property located at 1030 W. Katella Ave. during the five-year term of that Development Agreement in accordance with governmental approvals and entitlements granted by the City, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3766, "fingerprint": "2018|201800286|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800286|ORANGE", "content_hash": "424991df71c1e3f2", "measure_id": "201800286", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance to increase the minimum wage payable by hospitality industry employers located in the Anaheim or Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Zones that have tax rebate agreements with the City, and to require that service charges imposed by such employers be paid entirely to employees, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45237, "no_votes": 38229, "total_votes": 83466, "percent_yes": 54.19811659837539, "percent_no": 45.80188340162461, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.092862", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.551985", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance to increase the minimum wage payable by hospitality industry employers located in the Anaheim or Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Zones that have tax rebate agreements with the City, and to require that service charges imposed by such employers be paid entirely to employees, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3786, "fingerprint": "2018|201800584|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800584|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b87780401521318a", "measure_id": "201800584", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize aging classrooms/school facilities at local elementary/intermediate schools, repair termite damage, dry rot, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical, improve student safety/security, and upgrade classrooms, science labs, and facilities to support student achievement in math, science, technology, and arts, shall Lowell Joint School District issue $48,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, an estimated 3 cents per $100 assessed valuation ($3,000,000 annually) for approximately 33 years, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3298, "no_votes": 1596, "total_votes": 4894, "percent_yes": 67.38863914997957, "percent_no": 32.61136085002043, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Lowell Joint School District to issue $48 million...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Lowell Joint School District to issue $48 million in bonds to repair and modernize aging school facilities, including addressing structural damage and upgrading classrooms and labs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation over approximately 33 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.098450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.555889", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize aging classrooms/school facilities at local elementary/intermediate schools, repair termite damage, dry rot, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical, improve student safety/security, and upgrade classrooms, science labs, and facilities to support student achievement in math, science, technology, and arts, shall Lowell Joint School District issue $48,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, an estimated 3 cents per $100 assessed valuation ($3,000,000 annually) for approximately 33 years, with citizen oversight and all money locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3769, "fingerprint": "2018|201800289|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800289|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e7f1be6bc66ead33", "measure_id": "201800289", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, approving Ordinance No. 1173 which approves a zone change for the Cypress School District Maintenance Site, consisting of approximately 3.86 acres located at 5081 Orange Avenue, from \u201cPS-1A Public/Semi-Public\u201d to \u201cPC Planning Community (PC-14),\u201d thereby allowing for the construction of residential units, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6817, "no_votes": 9822, "total_votes": 16639, "percent_yes": 40.97001021696015, "percent_no": 59.02998978303985, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have changed the zoning of a 3", "summary_text": "The measure would have changed the zoning of a 3.86-acre Cypress School District maintenance site from public/semi-public use to planning community designation, allowing residential development on the property.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.093658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.552567", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, approving Ordinance No. 1173 which approves a zone change for the Cypress School District Maintenance Site, consisting of approximately 3.86 acres located at 5081 Orange Avenue, from \u201cPS-1A Public/Semi-Public\u201d to \u201cPC Planning Community (PC-14),\u201d thereby allowing for the construction of residential units, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3770, "fingerprint": "2018|201800290|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800290|ORANGE", "content_hash": "16a9e5f383192525", "measure_id": "201800290", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide effective 9-1-1 emergency response by preventing cuts to police/firefighter/paramedic staffing levels; maintain neighborhood police patrols/gang/drug prevention; protect local drinking water supplies; repair streets/potholes; address homelessness; support affordable housing options, and protect vital city services, shall the City of Garden Grove establish a one-cent sales tax providing $19,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring annual independent audits, citizens oversight, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27306, "no_votes": 15024, "total_votes": 42330, "percent_yes": 64.5074415308292, "percent_no": 35.4925584691708, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in Garden Grove to generate app...", "summary_text": "This measure established a one-cent sales tax in Garden Grove to generate approximately $19 million annually for city services including police, fire, paramedic staffing, street repairs, and homelessness programs. The tax includes requirements for annual independent audits, citizen oversight, and can only be ended by voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.093951", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.552768", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide effective 9-1-1 emergency response by preventing cuts to police/firefighter/paramedic staffing levels; maintain neighborhood police patrols/gang/drug prevention; protect local drinking water supplies; repair streets/potholes; address homelessness; support affordable housing options, and protect vital city services, shall the City of Garden Grove establish a one-cent sales tax providing $19,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring annual independent audits, citizens oversight, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3771, "fingerprint": "2018|201800291|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800291|ORANGE", "content_hash": "903df8b7ec99db50", "measure_id": "201800291", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to improve emergency evacuation and access routes, 9-1-1 emergency response in case of disaster, and help reduce wildfire risk by moving overhead wires underground on Laguna Canyon Road, key evacuation routes, and other areas, and providing other fire safety measures and improvements, by levying a one-percent (1%) dedicated sales tax for 25 years raising approximately $5.6 million annually, requiring financial audits, with all funds for Laguna Beach only, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6029, "no_votes": 7034, "total_votes": 13063, "percent_yes": 46.15325729158692, "percent_no": 53.84674270841308, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a 1% sales tax for 25 years in Laguna Beach t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a 1% sales tax for 25 years in Laguna Beach to fund fire safety improvements including moving overhead power lines underground on evacuation routes, enhancing emergency response systems, and other wildfire risk reduction measures, raising approximately $5.6 million annually. The measure failed with 46.2% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.094242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.552963", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to improve emergency evacuation and access routes, 9-1-1 emergency response in case of disaster, and help reduce wildfire risk by moving overhead wires underground on Laguna Canyon Road, key evacuation routes, and other areas, and providing other fire safety measures and improvements, by levying a one-percent (1%) dedicated sales tax for 25 years raising approximately $5.6 million annually, requiring financial audits, with all funds for Laguna Beach only, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3772, "fingerprint": "2018|201800292|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800292|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9e34fef95d967d15", "measure_id": "201800292", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) is successfully challenged in court, thereby permitting the City Council of the City of Lake Forest to change back to at-large (city-wide) City Council elections without threat of litigation and financial exposure under the CVRA, should the Council change from by-district to at-large (city-wide) elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15423, "no_votes": 11953, "total_votes": 27376, "percent_yes": 56.33766803039158, "percent_no": 43.66233196960842, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the Lake Forest City Council shoul...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked voters whether the Lake Forest City Council should change from district-based elections back to at-large (city-wide) elections if the California Voting Rights Act is successfully challenged in court, removing the legal requirement for district elections. The measure passed with 56.3% support, indicating voter preference for at-large elections should the legal framework change.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.094511", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.553155", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) is successfully challenged in court, thereby permitting the City Council of the City of Lake Forest to change back to at-large (city-wide) City Council elections without threat of litigation and financial exposure under the CVRA, should the Council change from by-district to at-large (city-wide) elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3773, "fingerprint": "2018|201800293|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800293|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1d362e58aef1180c", "measure_id": "201800293", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Lake Forest ordinance authorizing the City Council to return to at-large (City-wide) City Council elections, with the understanding that doing so could lead to litigation and financial exposure in the millions of dollars under the California Voting Rights Act, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10980, "no_votes": 16069, "total_votes": 27049, "percent_yes": 40.592997892713214, "percent_no": 59.407002107286786, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would have authorized the Lake Forest City Council to switch f...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would have authorized the Lake Forest City Council to switch from district-based elections back to at-large elections where all council members are elected citywide. The measure included a warning that this change could result in expensive litigation under the California Voting Rights Act.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.094772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.553352", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lake Forest ordinance authorizing the City Council to return to at-large (City-wide) City Council elections, with the understanding that doing so could lead to litigation and financial exposure in the millions of dollars under the California Voting Rights Act, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3774, "fingerprint": "2018|201800294|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800294|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1d362e58aef1180c", "measure_id": "201800294", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Lake Forest ordinance authorizing the City Council to return to at-large (City-wide) City Council elections, with the understanding that doing so could lead to litigation and financial exposure in the millions of dollars under the California Voting Rights Act, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24030, "no_votes": 5080, "total_votes": 29110, "percent_yes": 82.54895225008589, "percent_no": 17.45104774991411, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance authorizes the Lake Forest City Council to return to at-large e...", "summary_text": "The ordinance authorizes the Lake Forest City Council to return to at-large elections where all council members are elected city-wide rather than by district. The measure acknowledges potential litigation costs under the California Voting Rights Act for making this change.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.095030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.553546", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lake Forest ordinance authorizing the City Council to return to at-large (City-wide) City Council elections, with the understanding that doing so could lead to litigation and financial exposure in the millions of dollars under the California Voting Rights Act, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3775, "fingerprint": "2018|201800295|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800295|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c653ff7e7657d09a", "measure_id": "201800295", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Newport Beach City Charter Section 1109 be amended to require at least fifty-five percent (55%) voter approval prior to issuing Certificates of Participation or Lease Revenue Bonds greater than fifty million dollars ($50,000,000.00) to finance capital projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30564, "no_votes": 7686, "total_votes": 38250, "percent_yes": 79.90588235294118, "percent_no": 20.094117647058823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires at least 55% voter approval before the city c...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires at least 55% voter approval before the city can issue Certificates of Participation or Lease Revenue Bonds exceeding $50 million to finance capital projects. The measure passed with nearly 80% support from voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.095289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.553736", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Newport Beach City Charter Section 1109 be amended to require at least fifty-five percent (55%) voter approval prior to issuing Certificates of Participation or Lease Revenue Bonds greater than fifty million dollars ($50,000,000.00) to finance capital projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3776, "fingerprint": "2018|201800296|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800296|ORANGE", "content_hash": "146214f124d5e071", "measure_id": "201800296", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain Placentia\u2019s financial viability and provide funding for its local police department and essential city services, including street/pothole repair; quick responses to 911 emergencies; fire protection/emergency medical services; gang, drug, graffiti prevention; public cleanliness; general services, shall the ordinance establishing a one cent transactions and use (sales) tax be adopted, providing approximately $5,000,000 annually until ended by voters, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11584, "no_votes": 6810, "total_votes": 18394, "percent_yes": 62.977057736218335, "percent_no": 37.022942263781665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure established a one-cent sales tax in Placentia to fund loc...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure established a one-cent sales tax in Placentia to fund local police, fire protection, emergency services, street repairs, and other city services, generating approximately $5 million annually. The tax includes provisions for citizen oversight and independent audits, and can only be ended by voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.095588", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.553927", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain Placentia\u2019s financial viability and provide funding for its local police department and essential city services, including street/pothole repair; quick responses to 911 emergencies; fire protection/emergency medical services; gang, drug, graffiti prevention; public cleanliness; general services, shall the ordinance establishing a one cent transactions and use (sales) tax be adopted, providing approximately $5,000,000 annually until ended by voters, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3777, "fingerprint": "2018|201800297|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800297|ORANGE", "content_hash": "493087ea8491c578", "measure_id": "201800297", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance be adopted to change the manner in which City Council members are elected from \u201cat large\u201d to \u201cby district,\u201d to establish a task force to recommend district boundaries, and to require a special election if the City Council does not adopt the task force\u2019s recommendation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7990, "no_votes": 18933, "total_votes": 26923, "percent_yes": 29.677227649221848, "percent_no": 70.32277235077815, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have changed Orange City Council elections from an at-large...", "summary_text": "The measure would have changed Orange City Council elections from an at-large system where all voters choose all council members to a district-based system where voters only choose representatives from their specific geographic district. It would have established a task force to draw district boundaries and required a special election if the City Council rejected the task force's recommendations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.095892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.554132", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance be adopted to change the manner in which City Council members are elected from \u201cat large\u201d to \u201cby district,\u201d to establish a task force to recommend district boundaries, and to require a special election if the City Council does not adopt the task force\u2019s recommendation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3778, "fingerprint": "2018|201800298|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800298|ORANGE", "content_hash": "503e6c25b833d4c9", "measure_id": "201800298", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1657 be adopted to increase the transient occupancy tax (\u201cTOT\u201d) to 12\u00bd percent in perpetuity, for an estimated annual increase of $570,000, and to clarify the definition of \u201chotels\u201d that are subject to the tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12727, "no_votes": 15369, "total_votes": 28096, "percent_yes": 45.29826309794988, "percent_no": 54.70173690205012, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased Orange's transient occupancy tax from its c...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased Orange's transient occupancy tax from its current rate to 12.5 percent permanently and clarified which types of hotels are subject to the tax. The change was projected to generate approximately $570,000 in additional annual revenue for the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.096162", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.554333", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1657 be adopted to increase the transient occupancy tax (\u201cTOT\u201d) to 12\u00bd percent in perpetuity, for an estimated annual increase of $570,000, and to clarify the definition of \u201chotels\u201d that are subject to the tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3780, "fingerprint": "2018|201800300|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800300|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b4e34baa5e473e43", "measure_id": "201800300", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain effective 9-1-1 response; retaining firefighters and police officers; addressing homelessness; fixing streets; maintaining parks, youth and senior services, and unrestricted general revenue purposes; shall the sales tax be increased one and one half (1.5) cents until 2029 providing approximately $60 million dollars annually, then reduced to one (1) cent providing approximately $40 million dollars annually, until 2039, requiring annual audits, citizens oversight and for Santa Ana use only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33462, "no_votes": 24542, "total_votes": 58004, "percent_yes": 57.68912488793876, "percent_no": 42.31087511206124, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the sales tax by 1", "summary_text": "This measure increased the sales tax by 1.5 cents until 2029, then reduced it to 1 cent until 2039, to fund emergency services, police, firefighters, homelessness programs, street repairs, parks, and other city services. The tax is projected to generate approximately $60 million annually initially, then $40 million annually after 2029, with required annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.096795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.554725", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain effective 9-1-1 response; retaining firefighters and police officers; addressing homelessness; fixing streets; maintaining parks, youth and senior services, and unrestricted general revenue purposes; shall the sales tax be increased one and one half (1.5) cents until 2029 providing approximately $60 million dollars annually, then reduced to one (1) cent providing approximately $40 million dollars annually, until 2039, requiring annual audits, citizens oversight and for Santa Ana use only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3781, "fingerprint": "2018|201800301|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800301|ORANGE", "content_hash": "89138a9c0c76e0ca", "measure_id": "201800301", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 21 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code be amended to enact both a gross square footage tax of between 25 cents to $35.00 and a gross receipts tax rate up to 10% for cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, selling or testing cannabis and related products to raise between $8 to $12 million to fund public safety, parks, youth and senior services, among other general City services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40753, "no_votes": 16973, "total_votes": 57726, "percent_yes": 70.59730450750095, "percent_no": 29.40269549249905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amended Santa Ana Municipal Code to establish both a gross square...", "summary_text": "The measure amended Santa Ana Municipal Code to establish both a gross square footage tax (25 cents to $35.00) and a gross receipts tax (up to 10%) on cannabis businesses including cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, sales, and testing. The taxes were projected to generate $8-12 million annually for general city services including public safety, parks, and youth and senior services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.097060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.554918", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 21 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code be amended to enact both a gross square footage tax of between 25 cents to $35.00 and a gross receipts tax rate up to 10% for cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, selling or testing cannabis and related products to raise between $8 to $12 million to fund public safety, parks, youth and senior services, among other general City services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3782, "fingerprint": "2018|201800302|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800302|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3c8f9b485c1ab169", "measure_id": "201800302", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to: modernize and remove outdated language to reflect changes or conflicts in the City or State law concerning gifts and campaign contributions and designated City funds; create consistency in the Municipal Code regarding boards or commissions; and move the qualifications for the Finance Director to the Municipal Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37066, "no_votes": 18224, "total_votes": 55290, "percent_yes": 67.03924760354495, "percent_no": 32.96075239645505, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment modernized outdated language to align with current cit...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment modernized outdated language to align with current city and state laws on gifts, campaign contributions, and designated funds, created consistency in municipal code provisions for boards and commissions, and relocated Finance Director qualifications from the charter to the municipal code.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.097359", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.555111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to: modernize and remove outdated language to reflect changes or conflicts in the City or State law concerning gifts and campaign contributions and designated City funds; create consistency in the Municipal Code regarding boards or commissions; and move the qualifications for the Finance Director to the Municipal Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3790, "fingerprint": "2018|201800306|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800306|PLACER", "content_hash": "c00d94935d2d5e2c", "measure_id": "201800306", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To keep park and recreation facilities safe, clean and well maintained, shall the measure approving Rocklin City Ordinance 1093 be adopted? This measure would allow the City to continue to collect a $10.00 to $30.00 per year special tax to be used only for park maintenance and development. It would raise $600,000 annually and would extend for 10 years through June 30, 2029.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21323, "no_votes": 5927, "total_votes": 27250, "percent_yes": 78.24954128440366, "percent_no": 21.750458715596338, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows the City of Rocklin to continue collecting a special tax ...", "summary_text": "This measure allows the City of Rocklin to continue collecting a special tax of $10-30 per year for park maintenance and development, raising approximately $600,000 annually. The tax extension runs for 10 years through June 30, 2029.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.099681", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.556661", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep park and recreation facilities safe, clean and well maintained, shall the measure approving Rocklin City Ordinance 1093 be adopted? This measure would allow the City to continue to collect a $10.00 to $30.00 per year special tax to be used only for park maintenance and development. It would raise $600,000 annually and would extend for 10 years through June 30, 2029.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3795, "fingerprint": "2018|201800590|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800590|PLACER", "content_hash": "4c8d80fefcb333cc", "measure_id": "201800590", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure all students receive a well-rounded, high quality education to prepare them for college, university and careers; maintain and prevent cuts in science, technology, music, art, honors and career/job training programs, shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District renew and increase its expiring parcel tax at the rate of $148 generating $5,600,000 annually for 9 years; requiring citizens oversight, independent audits, senior exemptions, and funds used in Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4533, "no_votes": 1306, "total_votes": 5839, "percent_yes": 77.63315636239082, "percent_no": 22.36684363760918, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure renewed and increased an expiring parcel tax in the Tahoe Trucke...", "summary_text": "This measure renewed and increased an expiring parcel tax in the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District to $148 per parcel, generating $5.6 million annually for nine years to fund educational programs including science, technology, music, art, honors, and career training. The measure included provisions for citizen oversight, independent audits, senior exemptions, and required funds to be used only within the district.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.101203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.557633", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure all students receive a well-rounded, high quality education to prepare them for college, university and careers; maintain and prevent cuts in science, technology, music, art, honors and career/job training programs, shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District renew and increase its expiring parcel tax at the rate of $148 generating $5,600,000 annually for 9 years; requiring citizens oversight, independent audits, senior exemptions, and funds used in Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3791, "fingerprint": "2018|201800307|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800307|PLACER", "content_hash": "7ba6211e8b3ef8b1", "measure_id": "201800307", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to ensure essential City services including neighborhood police patrols, fire protection, 9-1-1 emergency response; crime suppression/investigation; street and pothole repair; libraries, parks and recreation; job creation and economic improvement programs; and unrestricted general revenue purposes by establishing a 1/2\u00a2 Transactions and Use (\"sales\") tax, providing an estimated $18.4M annually, until ended by voters, with independent citizens' oversight, regular audits, no money for the state, and all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34792, "no_votes": 20928, "total_votes": 55720, "percent_yes": 62.44077530509692, "percent_no": 37.55922469490308, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a 0", "summary_text": "This measure established a 0.5% local sales tax in Placer, California to fund city services including police, fire, emergency response, street repairs, libraries, parks, and economic programs, generating an estimated $18.4 million annually. The tax continues until voters choose to end it and includes provisions for citizen oversight and audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.100010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.556852", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to ensure essential City services including neighborhood police patrols, fire protection, 9-1-1 emergency response; crime suppression/investigation; street and pothole repair; libraries, parks and recreation; job creation and economic improvement programs; and unrestricted general revenue purposes by establishing a 1/2\u00a2 Transactions and Use (\"sales\") tax, providing an estimated $18.4M annually, until ended by voters, with independent citizens' oversight, regular audits, no money for the state, and all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3789, "fingerprint": "2018|201800305|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800305|PLACER", "content_hash": "49004626e54449f9", "measure_id": "201800305", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $8,000 to $12,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 431, "no_votes": 262, "total_votes": 693, "percent_yes": 62.19336219336219, "percent_no": 37.80663780663781, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Placer to tax cannabis businesses at rate...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Placer to tax cannabis businesses at rates up to $10 per square foot for cultivation, 6% of gross receipts for retail, and 4% for other cannabis businesses to fund general municipal expenses. The tax was expected to generate $8,000 to $12,000 annually and would remain in effect until repealed by voters or the City Council.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.099305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.556471", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $8,000 to $12,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3793, "fingerprint": "2018|201800588|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800588|PLACER", "content_hash": "a756dcdf7004c5a6", "measure_id": "201800588", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms/facilities at Del Oro High School; repair deteriorating roofs/plumbing; upgrade science, math, computer, engineering labs and career education classrooms; maintain safe drinking water; reduce overcrowding; improve safety/security; shall the measure for Del Oro High School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of Placer Union High School District issuing $40,300,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $2,341,000 raised annually until 2050, rates estimated at $27 per $100,000 assessed valuation be adopted, with independent oversight/audits, funding used for Del Oro High School only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7319, "no_votes": 5733, "total_votes": 13052, "percent_yes": 56.07569721115537, "percent_no": 43.92430278884463, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Del Oro High School Facilities Improvement Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Del Oro High School Facilities Improvement District to issue $40.3 million in bonds to repair and upgrade aging facilities at Del Oro High School, including classrooms, roofs, plumbing, and science labs. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at an estimated rate of $27 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, with funds restricted to Del Oro High School only and subject to independent oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.100643", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.557246", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms/facilities at Del Oro High School; repair deteriorating roofs/plumbing; upgrade science, math, computer, engineering labs and career education classrooms; maintain safe drinking water; reduce overcrowding; improve safety/security; shall the measure for Del Oro High School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of Placer Union High School District issuing $40,300,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $2,341,000 raised annually until 2050, rates estimated at $27 per $100,000 assessed valuation be adopted, with independent oversight/audits, funding used for Del Oro High School only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3792, "fingerprint": "2018|201800587|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800587|PLACER", "content_hash": "86bba9bd507fafdb", "measure_id": "201800587", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To bring older buildings to code/standards for continued use, improve workforce job training facilities to affordably prepare, train/retrain students/veterans for quality jobs, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, equipment, shall the measure for Sierra Joint Community College District to issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates and levy on average 1.7 cents/$100 assessed value ($18,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with taxpayer oversight/audits, no money for administrator salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55302, "no_votes": 44423, "total_votes": 99725, "percent_yes": 55.454499874655305, "percent_no": 44.545500125344695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Sierra Joint Community College District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Sierra Joint Community College District to issue $350 million in bonds to renovate older buildings, improve job training facilities, and repair or construct classrooms and equipment. The bonds would be repaid through a property tax levy averaging 1.7 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.100309", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.557053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To bring older buildings to code/standards for continued use, improve workforce job training facilities to affordably prepare, train/retrain students/veterans for quality jobs, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, equipment, shall the measure for Sierra Joint Community College District to issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates and levy on average 1.7 cents/$100 assessed value ($18,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with taxpayer oversight/audits, no money for administrator salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3794, "fingerprint": "2018|201800589|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800589|PLACER", "content_hash": "d4f23775669ef414", "measure_id": "201800589", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms/labs/facilities at Placer High School; repair deteriorating roofs/plumbing/bathrooms; upgrade math/computer/engineering labs and vocational/career education classrooms; maintain safe drinking water; improve safety/security systems; shall the measure for Placer High School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of Placer Union High School District issuing $42,100,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $2,447,000 raised annually until 2050, rates estimated at $27 per $100,000 assessed valuation be adopted, with independent oversight/audits, funding for Placer High School only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10445, "no_votes": 6755, "total_votes": 17200, "percent_yes": 60.72674418604651, "percent_no": 39.27325581395349, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Placer High School Facilities Improvement Distric...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Placer High School Facilities Improvement District to issue $42.1 million in bonds to repair and upgrade facilities at Placer High School, including classrooms, labs, roofs, plumbing, bathrooms, and safety systems. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging approximately $27 per $100,000 of assessed valuation until 2050.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.100940", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.557440", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms/labs/facilities at Placer High School; repair deteriorating roofs/plumbing/bathrooms; upgrade math/computer/engineering labs and vocational/career education classrooms; maintain safe drinking water; improve safety/security systems; shall the measure for Placer High School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of Placer Union High School District issuing $42,100,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, averaging $2,447,000 raised annually until 2050, rates estimated at $27 per $100,000 assessed valuation be adopted, with independent oversight/audits, funding for Placer High School only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3796, "fingerprint": "2018|201800591|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800591|PLACER", "content_hash": "644ddb1c7682bead", "measure_id": "201800591", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the measure to improve schools and student safety with funding that cannot be taken by the State, upgrade safety/security communication systems, qualify for State matching funds; provide health science labs/classrooms, college/job training facilities; aquatic center/physical education facilities, shall Western Placer Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds with an average of $3,600,000 raised annually for 32 years at average tax rates of 2.5\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, requiring independent audits/oversight be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10196, "no_votes": 14525, "total_votes": 24721, "percent_yes": 41.24428623437563, "percent_no": 58.75571376562437, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the Western Placer Unified School District...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the Western Placer Unified School District to issue $60 million in bonds to fund school safety improvements, health science labs, college/job training facilities, and aquatic/physical education facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes at an average rate of 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed value over 32 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.101472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.557829", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to improve schools and student safety with funding that cannot be taken by the State, upgrade safety/security communication systems, qualify for State matching funds; provide health science labs/classrooms, college/job training facilities; aquatic center/physical education facilities, shall Western Placer Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds with an average of $3,600,000 raised annually for 32 years at average tax rates of 2.5\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, requiring independent audits/oversight be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3797, "fingerprint": "2018|201800051|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800051|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "76ef797232fc8610", "measure_id": "201800051", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Initiative Measure B to enact voter-approved county ordinance on cannabis activities be adopted adding Title 11 to Plumas County Code licensing certain medicinal and adult use commercial cannabis activities in specified land use zones, and imposing an initial 2% general tax on the net profits of such cannabis activity, with such rate subject to possible increase by the Board of Supervisors by not more than 1% per year for no more than four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3259, "no_votes": 5868, "total_votes": 9127, "percent_yes": 35.707242248274355, "percent_no": 64.29275775172565, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have allowed certain commercial medicinal and adult-use can...", "summary_text": "The measure would have allowed certain commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis activities in specified zones of Plumas County and imposed an initial 2% tax on net profits from such businesses. The tax rate could have been increased by the Board of Supervisors by up to 1% per year for a maximum of four years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.101743", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.558032", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Initiative Measure B to enact voter-approved county ordinance on cannabis activities be adopted adding Title 11 to Plumas County Code licensing certain medicinal and adult use commercial cannabis activities in specified land use zones, and imposing an initial 2% general tax on the net profits of such cannabis activity, with such rate subject to possible increase by the Board of Supervisors by not more than 1% per year for no more than four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3821, "fingerprint": "2018|201800592|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800592|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3ef15ccc3ad919cb", "measure_id": "201800592", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Jose J. Barragan be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 827, "no_votes": 400, "total_votes": 1227, "percent_yes": 67.40016299918501, "percent_no": 32.599837000814986, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.108815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.562715", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jose J. Barragan be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3799, "fingerprint": "2018|201800309|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800309|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "aed8c5fe9b6c7142", "measure_id": "201800309", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure ordinance which legalizes marijuana dispensaries and commercial marijuana activity in the Manufacturing-Service Commercial Zone and imposes certain operational requirements on marijuana dispensaries and commercial marijuana activities in this zone be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4383, "no_votes": 5880, "total_votes": 10263, "percent_yes": 42.70681087401344, "percent_no": 57.29318912598656, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have legalized marijuana dispensaries and commercial mariju...", "summary_text": "The measure would have legalized marijuana dispensaries and commercial marijuana activities in Riverside's Manufacturing-Service Commercial Zone while imposing operational requirements on such businesses.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.102349", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.558420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure ordinance which legalizes marijuana dispensaries and commercial marijuana activity in the Manufacturing-Service Commercial Zone and imposes certain operational requirements on marijuana dispensaries and commercial marijuana activities in this zone be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3820, "fingerprint": "2018|201800330|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800330|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ab3450d90926365d", "measure_id": "201800330", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure establishing a one-cent sales tax providing approximately $1,700,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring financial audits, citizen's oversight, all funds for Wildomar, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5921, "no_votes": 4171, "total_votes": 10092, "percent_yes": 58.67023384859294, "percent_no": 41.32976615140706, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.108461", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.562522", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure establishing a one-cent sales tax providing approximately $1,700,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring financial audits, citizen's oversight, all funds for Wildomar, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3800, "fingerprint": "2018|201800310|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800310|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "31b77d089514a1ab", "measure_id": "201800310", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure ordinance which prohibits marijuana dispensaries and commercial marijuana activity, with certain limited exceptions for medical marijuana cultivation, in all zones of the City of Jurupa Valley be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5478, "no_votes": 4078, "total_votes": 9556, "percent_yes": 57.325240686479695, "percent_no": 42.674759313520305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure prohibits marijuana dispensaries and commercial marijuana activit...", "summary_text": "The measure prohibits marijuana dispensaries and commercial marijuana activity in Jurupa Valley, with limited exceptions for medical marijuana cultivation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.102613", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.558616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure ordinance which prohibits marijuana dispensaries and commercial marijuana activity, with certain limited exceptions for medical marijuana cultivation, in all zones of the City of Jurupa Valley be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3801, "fingerprint": "2018|201800311|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800311|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ceb6c5e4ef8028bb", "measure_id": "201800311", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Palm Springs prohibit vacation rentals in single family residences?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4539, "no_votes": 10619, "total_votes": 15158, "percent_yes": 29.944583718168623, "percent_no": 70.05541628183138, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited vacation rentals in single-family homes wi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited vacation rentals in single-family homes within the city of Palm Springs. The measure failed with only 29.9% of voters supporting the ban.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.102875", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.558813", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Palm Springs prohibit vacation rentals in single family residences?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3825, "fingerprint": "2018|201800596|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800596|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "46d77ef73ed6f490", "measure_id": "201800596", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, labs, Veterans Center, career counseling/job training facilities for science, engineering, nursing, industrial careers; improve student safety, access to affordable, high quality education; repair, construct/acquire classrooms, facilities, sites, equipment, shall San Bernardino Community College District's measure authorizing $470,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2.5 cents/$100 assessed value, $28,000,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1256, "no_votes": 1230, "total_votes": 2486, "percent_yes": 50.5229283990346, "percent_no": 49.4770716009654, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized San Bernardino Community College District t...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized San Bernardino Community College District to issue $470 million in bonds to upgrade and construct classrooms, labs, and other educational facilities, funded by a property tax levy of 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed value. The bonds would have generated approximately $28 million annually while outstanding to fund improvements to science, engineering, nursing, and career training facilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.109964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.563531", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, labs, Veterans Center, career counseling/job training facilities for science, engineering, nursing, industrial careers; improve student safety, access to affordable, high quality education; repair, construct/acquire classrooms, facilities, sites, equipment, shall San Bernardino Community College District's measure authorizing $470,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2.5 cents/$100 assessed value, $28,000,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3798, "fingerprint": "2018|201800308|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800308|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cba4f0ceedd47d8c", "measure_id": "201800308", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance NO. 888-18 be adopted authorizing a commercial cannabis business tax in the City of Blythe of up to three dollars per square foot of cultivation, up to two percent of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses and an annual business license fee of five thousand dollars to maintain essential public safety and general city services including, but not limited to, police, fire, park and street maintenance, recreation and economic development?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1235, "no_votes": 234, "total_votes": 1469, "percent_yes": 84.070796460177, "percent_no": 15.929203539823007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorizes the City of Blythe to impose a business tax on commerc...", "summary_text": "The measure authorizes the City of Blythe to impose a business tax on commercial cannabis operations of up to $3 per square foot for cultivation facilities and up to 2% of gross receipts for other cannabis businesses, plus a $5,000 annual license fee. The revenue would fund city services including public safety, parks, streets, recreation, and economic development.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.102052", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.558224", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance NO. 888-18 be adopted authorizing a commercial cannabis business tax in the City of Blythe of up to three dollars per square foot of cultivation, up to two percent of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses and an annual business license fee of five thousand dollars to maintain essential public safety and general city services including, but not limited to, police, fire, park and street maintenance, recreation and economic development?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3823, "fingerprint": "2018|201800594|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800594|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d1aeb7c7ac4f216e", "measure_id": "201800594", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make health, safety, and security improvements; and construct a new barn/agricultural rehabilitation center; shall the Palo Verde Unified School District issue $24,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $1,300,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1825, "no_votes": 1105, "total_votes": 2930, "percent_yes": 62.28668941979522, "percent_no": 37.71331058020478, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Palo Verde Unified School District to issue $24", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Palo Verde Unified School District to issue $24.8 million in bonds to modernize classrooms and facilities, make health and safety improvements, and construct a new agricultural center. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes at approximately 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed value.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.109380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.563105", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make health, safety, and security improvements; and construct a new barn/agricultural rehabilitation center; shall the Palo Verde Unified School District issue $24,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating on average $1,300,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4.9 cents per $100 assessed value, with citizens' oversight committee, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3818, "fingerprint": "2018|201800328|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800328|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "482356a587fa8935", "measure_id": "201800328", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure known as the COMMERCIAL MARIJUANA DISTRIBUTION AND MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS TAX MEASURE, estimated to annually collect approximately $2.3 million from commercial marijuana distribution and manufacturing operations (through a maximum tax rate of ten cents for each $1 of proceeds), to be administered and implemented pursuant to Chapter 3.40 of Title 3 of the Perris Municipal Code, with no sunset clause, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8146, "no_votes": 3224, "total_votes": 11370, "percent_yes": 71.64467897977133, "percent_no": 28.355321020228672, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a tax of up to ten cents per dollar of proceeds on c...", "summary_text": "This measure established a tax of up to ten cents per dollar of proceeds on commercial marijuana distribution and manufacturing operations in Riverside, California, with an estimated annual collection of approximately $2.3 million and no expiration date.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.107929", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.562104", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure known as the COMMERCIAL MARIJUANA DISTRIBUTION AND MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS TAX MEASURE, estimated to annually collect approximately $2.3 million from commercial marijuana distribution and manufacturing operations (through a maximum tax rate of ten cents for each $1 of proceeds), to be administered and implemented pursuant to Chapter 3.40 of Title 3 of the Perris Municipal Code, with no sunset clause, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3819, "fingerprint": "2018|201800329|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800329|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2f2182bb7283c5ec", "measure_id": "201800329", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, establishing a lifetime term limit of three (3) terms served as an elected official in the City of Perris, including Mayor, member of the City Council, and City Clerk, in which the terms served by a person elected or appointed to one elected office shall not be aggregated with terms served by that person in another elected office, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8702, "no_votes": 2652, "total_votes": 11354, "percent_yes": 76.64259291879515, "percent_no": 23.357407081204855, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure establishes a lifetime limit of three terms for each elected off...", "summary_text": "This measure establishes a lifetime limit of three terms for each elected office in the City of Perris (Mayor, City Council member, and City Clerk), with terms served in different offices not counting against each other's limits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.108197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.562295", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, establishing a lifetime term limit of three (3) terms served as an elected official in the City of Perris, including Mayor, member of the City Council, and City Clerk, in which the terms served by a person elected or appointed to one elected office shall not be aggregated with terms served by that person in another elected office, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3812, "fingerprint": "2018|201800322|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800322|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "be2eaf1be00d30e0", "measure_id": "201800322", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance providing for (1) the election of an at-large Mayor to two year term in 2020, (2) the elimination of the at-large Mayor office in 2022, and (3) the creation of a fifth City Council district in 2022, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12390, "no_votes": 15493, "total_votes": 27883, "percent_yes": 44.43567765305025, "percent_no": 55.56432234694975, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have created an at-large mayor position for a single two-ye...", "summary_text": "The measure would have created an at-large mayor position for a single two-year term from 2020-2022, then eliminated that position and added a fifth city council district in 2022.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.106104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.560950", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance providing for (1) the election of an at-large Mayor to two year term in 2020, (2) the elimination of the at-large Mayor office in 2022, and (3) the creation of a fifth City Council district in 2022, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3813, "fingerprint": "2018|201800323|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800323|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cc94ffc88cfaa271", "measure_id": "201800323", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance eliminating term limits applicable to the City Council members of the City of Menifee, and to the Mayor of the City of Menifee, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8162, "no_votes": 20175, "total_votes": 28337, "percent_yes": 28.80333133359212, "percent_no": 71.19666866640787, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have eliminated term limits for City Council members and th...", "summary_text": "The measure would have eliminated term limits for City Council members and the Mayor of the City of Menifee. It failed with 28.8% voter support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.106369", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.561144", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance eliminating term limits applicable to the City Council members of the City of Menifee, and to the Mayor of the City of Menifee, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3810, "fingerprint": "2018|201800320|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800320|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "658cd26e44a8e1c5", "measure_id": "201800320", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain general City services such as police and fire protection, street operations and maintenance, and community activities including Indian Wells Golf Resort, shall the Indian Wells Municipal Code be amended to increase the Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax rate from 11.25% to 12.25% of rent charged for transient occupancy of any hotel room or similar lodging, generating approximately $700,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1625, "no_votes": 598, "total_votes": 2223, "percent_yes": 73.09941520467837, "percent_no": 26.900584795321635, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax rate in Indian Wells from 11", "summary_text": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax rate in Indian Wells from 11.25% to 12.25% on hotel rooms and similar lodging to generate approximately $700,000 annually for general city services. The tax increase would remain in effect until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.105459", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.560558", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain general City services such as police and fire protection, street operations and maintenance, and community activities including Indian Wells Golf Resort, shall the Indian Wells Municipal Code be amended to increase the Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax rate from 11.25% to 12.25% of rent charged for transient occupancy of any hotel room or similar lodging, generating approximately $700,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3811, "fingerprint": "2018|201800321|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800321|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "818fcf42baa19327", "measure_id": "201800321", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance which legalizes retail cannabis sales and commercial cannabis activity in certain zones, imposes operational requirements, and imposes an annual general tax of up to $25 per square foot of space used for retail cannabis sales and up to $3 per square foot for space used for other commercial cannabis activity (potentially generating $196,875 annually from retail sales and an unknown amount from other commercial activity and continuing until repealed) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11214, "no_votes": 9590, "total_votes": 20804, "percent_yes": 53.90309555854643, "percent_no": 46.09690444145357, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure legalized retail cannabis sales and commercial cannabis activity ...", "summary_text": "The measure legalized retail cannabis sales and commercial cannabis activity in designated zones in Riverside, while imposing annual taxes of up to $25 per square foot for retail cannabis space and up to $3 per square foot for other commercial cannabis operations. The ordinance also established operational requirements for cannabis businesses and was projected to generate approximately $196,875 annually from retail sales taxes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.105758", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.560751", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance which legalizes retail cannabis sales and commercial cannabis activity in certain zones, imposes operational requirements, and imposes an annual general tax of up to $25 per square foot of space used for retail cannabis sales and up to $3 per square foot for space used for other commercial cannabis activity (potentially generating $196,875 annually from retail sales and an unknown amount from other commercial activity and continuing until repealed) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3814, "fingerprint": "2018|201800324|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800324|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d12d65d326998a7b", "measure_id": "201800324", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted maintaining safe, clean public areas/improving local services including neighborhood police patrols, fire, 911 response; gang, youth violence prevention, after-school programs; combat robberies/burglaries; repair potholes; unrestricted general revenue purposes; by establishing a tax not exceeding 8% of gross receipts /$15 per square foot for cultivation, generating approximately $2,200,000 annually until ended by voters, with independent audits, public review, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29286, "no_votes": 10238, "total_votes": 39524, "percent_yes": 74.09675134095738, "percent_no": 25.903248659042617, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes a tax on cannabis cultivation of up to 8% of gross re...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes a tax on cannabis cultivation of up to 8% of gross receipts or $15 per square foot, expected to generate approximately $2.2 million annually for general city revenue. The funds would support various city services including police patrols, fire and emergency response, youth programs, infrastructure repairs, and other unrestricted municipal purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.106634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.561334", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted maintaining safe, clean public areas/improving local services including neighborhood police patrols, fire, 911 response; gang, youth violence prevention, after-school programs; combat robberies/burglaries; repair potholes; unrestricted general revenue purposes; by establishing a tax not exceeding 8% of gross receipts /$15 per square foot for cultivation, generating approximately $2,200,000 annually until ended by voters, with independent audits, public review, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3802, "fingerprint": "2018|201800312|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800312|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3ddfe6a191a8ca59", "measure_id": "201800312", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To add between $644,800 and $1,289,600 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes such as police, fire, paramedics, parks, roads, senior programs, and other municipal services, shall a measure imposing a commercial cannabis cultivation tax (set at $15 per square foot of canopy space and potentially increasing to $25 per square foot), and imposing up to 10% tax on gross receipts of cannabis manufacturing and testing laboratory facilities, with both taxes continuing until repealed, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5031, "no_votes": 3178, "total_votes": 8209, "percent_yes": 61.286392983311, "percent_no": 38.713607016689, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed taxes on commercial cannabis operations in Riverside, in...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed taxes on commercial cannabis operations in Riverside, including a $15 per square foot tax on cultivation canopy space (potentially increasing to $25) and up to 10% tax on gross receipts from manufacturing and testing facilities. The taxes were projected to generate between $644,800 and $1,289,600 annually for general city services including police, fire, parks, roads, and senior programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.103136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.559007", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To add between $644,800 and $1,289,600 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes such as police, fire, paramedics, parks, roads, senior programs, and other municipal services, shall a measure imposing a commercial cannabis cultivation tax (set at $15 per square foot of canopy space and potentially increasing to $25 per square foot), and imposing up to 10% tax on gross receipts of cannabis manufacturing and testing laboratory facilities, with both taxes continuing until repealed, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3803, "fingerprint": "2018|201800313|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800313|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4ea45675783bbc97", "measure_id": "201800313", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To add between $1,168,800 and $1,558,400 in funding annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes such as police, fire, paramedics, parks and recreation, road improvements, capital maintenance, senior and youth programs, and other general municipal services, shall a measure imposing a 10% tax on the gross receipts of cannabis retail businesses in city (with the tax continuing until repealed, and the rate potentially increasing to 15%) be adopted?[", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5062, "no_votes": 3116, "total_votes": 8178, "percent_yes": 61.89777451699682, "percent_no": 38.10222548300318, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a 10% tax on gross receipts of cannabis retail businesse...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a 10% tax on gross receipts of cannabis retail businesses in Riverside, with the potential to increase to 15%, generating an estimated $1.17 to $1.56 million annually for general municipal services including police, fire, parks, roads, and other city operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.103396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.559201", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To add between $1,168,800 and $1,558,400 in funding annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes such as police, fire, paramedics, parks and recreation, road improvements, capital maintenance, senior and youth programs, and other general municipal services, shall a measure imposing a 10% tax on the gross receipts of cannabis retail businesses in city (with the tax continuing until repealed, and the rate potentially increasing to 15%) be adopted?[", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3804, "fingerprint": "2018|201800314|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800314|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b2de919d3c4867ea", "measure_id": "201800314", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To allow approximately $2,325,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes such as police, fire, paramedics, parks, and senior services while stabilizing electric utility rates, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a transfer not to exceed 7.5% of annual electric utility gross revenues to the City's General Fund until December 1, 2021 and 5.5% thereafter, for unlimited duration, and establishing a rate freeze for 3 years, except as needed for financial emergency or bond covenants?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3983, "no_votes": 4175, "total_votes": 8158, "percent_yes": 48.82324099043883, "percent_no": 51.17675900956117, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the transfer of up to 7", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the transfer of up to 7.5% of electric utility gross revenues to Riverside's general fund through 2021 and 5.5% thereafter, generating approximately $2.3 million annually for city services while implementing a three-year rate freeze. The measure failed with 48.8% support in 2018.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.103699", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.559397", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To allow approximately $2,325,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes such as police, fire, paramedics, parks, and senior services while stabilizing electric utility rates, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a transfer not to exceed 7.5% of annual electric utility gross revenues to the City's General Fund until December 1, 2021 and 5.5% thereafter, for unlimited duration, and establishing a rate freeze for 3 years, except as needed for financial emergency or bond covenants?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3817, "fingerprint": "2018|201800327|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800327|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "0390627a18b65d13", "measure_id": "201800327", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve general City services, such as police/emergency response, parks, youth/senior services, and street repair, shall the City of Palm Desert enact a general tax on cannabis businesses of up to $20 per square foot for cultivation; up to 3% of gross receipts for cannabis manufacturing; and up to 15% of gross receipts for cannabis retail sales and delivery; generating u to $5,430,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13918, "no_votes": 4261, "total_votes": 18179, "percent_yes": 76.56086693437483, "percent_no": 23.43913306562517, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a general tax on cannabis businesses in Palm Desert, wit...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a general tax on cannabis businesses in Palm Desert, with rates of up to $20 per square foot for cultivation, up to 3% of gross receipts for manufacturing, and up to 15% of gross receipts for retail sales and delivery. The tax was projected to generate up to $5.43 million annually for the city's general fund to support various municipal services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.107617", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.561913", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve general City services, such as police/emergency response, parks, youth/senior services, and street repair, shall the City of Palm Desert enact a general tax on cannabis businesses of up to $20 per square foot for cultivation; up to 3% of gross receipts for cannabis manufacturing; and up to 15% of gross receipts for cannabis retail sales and delivery; generating u to $5,430,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3816, "fingerprint": "2018|201800326|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800326|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "35053e8fd4e7558f", "measure_id": "201800326", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To keep Norco \"Norco,\" continue protecting Norco's unique animal-keeping lifestyle, avoid further infrastructure deterioration, continue restoring and maintaining local streets, trails, facilities, equestrian amenities and parks, and prevent additional cuts to police, fire and emergency medical services; shall the City of Norco adopt a locally-controlled one-cent sales tax, generating approximately $4.5 million annually, until ended by voters, requiring independent audits and a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4768, "no_votes": 3663, "total_votes": 8431, "percent_yes": 56.55319653659115, "percent_no": 43.44680346340885, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopted a one-cent local sales tax in Norco, California to gener...", "summary_text": "This measure adopted a one-cent local sales tax in Norco, California to generate approximately $4.5 million annually for maintaining streets, trails, facilities, parks, and public safety services. The tax includes provisions for independent audits and citizen oversight, and continues until voters decide to end it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.107173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.561721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep Norco \"Norco,\" continue protecting Norco's unique animal-keeping lifestyle, avoid further infrastructure deterioration, continue restoring and maintaining local streets, trails, facilities, equestrian amenities and parks, and prevent additional cuts to police, fire and emergency medical services; shall the City of Norco adopt a locally-controlled one-cent sales tax, generating approximately $4.5 million annually, until ended by voters, requiring independent audits and a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3805, "fingerprint": "2018|201800315|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800315|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c68f038129b6b08c", "measure_id": "201800315", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue life safety services/911 emergency response times; preserve local control; prevent cuts to sheriff's deputies, firefighters/paramedics; keep Canyon Lake Fire Station open; and other essential City services, shall Ordinance No. 177 be adopted continuing the existing, voter-approved 3.95% utility users' tax providing $1,000,000 annually until ended by voters, continuing to require independent audits, all funds used for Canyon Lake, with no tax rate increase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3507, "no_votes": 1056, "total_votes": 4563, "percent_yes": 76.85733070348455, "percent_no": 23.14266929651545, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would continue Canyon Lake's existing 3", "summary_text": "This measure would continue Canyon Lake's existing 3.95% utility users' tax, which generates approximately $1,000,000 annually for city services including emergency response, sheriff's deputies, and firefighters. The tax would remain in effect until ended by voters and requires independent audits with all funds designated for Canyon Lake use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.103994", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.559590", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue life safety services/911 emergency response times; preserve local control; prevent cuts to sheriff's deputies, firefighters/paramedics; keep Canyon Lake Fire Station open; and other essential City services, shall Ordinance No. 177 be adopted continuing the existing, voter-approved 3.95% utility users' tax providing $1,000,000 annually until ended by voters, continuing to require independent audits, all funds used for Canyon Lake, with no tax rate increase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3815, "fingerprint": "2018|201800325|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800325|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "35b5935f438469a4", "measure_id": "201800325", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain the City of Murrieta's long-term finances, provide funding for general services including faster response times to 911 emergencies, improved fire protection/paramedic services, increase police to strengthen crime prevention, reduce gang activity/ drug crimes, graffiti removal, and parks and recreation/street maintenance/pothole repair, shall the measure establishing a one-cent sales tax until ended by voters be adopted, providing approximately $14,000,000 annually for city services, requiring citizen oversight and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17298, "no_votes": 15616, "total_votes": 32914, "percent_yes": 52.555143707844685, "percent_no": 47.444856292155315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure established a one-cent sales tax in Murrieta to fund general city...", "summary_text": "The measure established a one-cent sales tax in Murrieta to fund general city services including police, fire, emergency response, parks, street maintenance, and other municipal operations, generating approximately $14 million annually. The tax remains in effect until voters choose to end it and includes citizen oversight requirements with local control of funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.106896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.561529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the City of Murrieta's long-term finances, provide funding for general services including faster response times to 911 emergencies, improved fire protection/paramedic services, increase police to strengthen crime prevention, reduce gang activity/ drug crimes, graffiti removal, and parks and recreation/street maintenance/pothole repair, shall the measure establishing a one-cent sales tax until ended by voters be adopted, providing approximately $14,000,000 annually for city services, requiring citizen oversight and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3806, "fingerprint": "2018|201800316|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800316|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ed7497a290bad90b", "measure_id": "201800316", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Measure to select the Mayor of the City of Desert Hot Springs City Council annually for a one-year term with the procedure for rotation to be adopted by ordinance of the City Council, and all City Council seats to be a four-year term commencing in the year 2020 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1814, "no_votes": 3211, "total_votes": 5025, "percent_yes": 36.09950248756219, "percent_no": 63.90049751243781, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed Desert Hot Springs' mayoral selection to an a...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed Desert Hot Springs' mayoral selection to an annual rotation among City Council members rather than direct election, and extended all City Council terms from two years to four years starting in 2020.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.104260", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.559786", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Measure to select the Mayor of the City of Desert Hot Springs City Council annually for a one-year term with the procedure for rotation to be adopted by ordinance of the City Council, and all City Council seats to be a four-year term commencing in the year 2020 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3807, "fingerprint": "2018|201800317|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800317|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "6d498cd8c49b0693", "measure_id": "201800317", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Measure to have a directly-elected Mayor by the people of Desert Hot Springs be a four-year term, rather than the current two-year term, with the directly-elected Mayor having a term limit of two terms, commencing in the year 2020 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2587, "no_votes": 2468, "total_votes": 5055, "percent_yes": 51.17705242334323, "percent_no": 48.82294757665677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the mayor's term in Desert Hot Springs from two years to...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the mayor's term in Desert Hot Springs from two years to four years and established a two-term limit for the directly-elected mayor, beginning in 2020.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.104524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.559978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Measure to have a directly-elected Mayor by the people of Desert Hot Springs be a four-year term, rather than the current two-year term, with the directly-elected Mayor having a term limit of two terms, commencing in the year 2020 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3824, "fingerprint": "2018|201800595|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800595|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "52e8a74314a29ba0", "measure_id": "201800595", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a high school for Menifee, additional classrooms at high schools serving Perris, Romoland, and Nuevo, relieve severe overcrowding, improve our schools, student safety, college readiness, access to math, science, engineering, technology, skilled trades, repair, acquire, construct classrooms/labs/equipment/facilities, shall this Perris Union High School District measure authorizing $148,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 3\u00a2/$100 assessed value (averaging $10,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight/ all money locally controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25924, "no_votes": 20463, "total_votes": 46387, "percent_yes": 55.88634746804062, "percent_no": 44.11365253195938, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.109685", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.563297", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a high school for Menifee, additional classrooms at high schools serving Perris, Romoland, and Nuevo, relieve severe overcrowding, improve our schools, student safety, college readiness, access to math, science, engineering, technology, skilled trades, repair, acquire, construct classrooms/labs/equipment/facilities, shall this Perris Union High School District measure authorizing $148,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately 3\u00a2/$100 assessed value (averaging $10,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight/ all money locally controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3822, "fingerprint": "2018|201800593|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800593|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "0613c6c036c9473a", "measure_id": "201800593", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood school safety/security; upgrade academic, science, technology, engineering, math, vocational classrooms/labs; repair deteriorating plumbing, roofs, electrical systems; remove asbestos/lead paint; shall Hemet Unified School District issue $150 million in bonds at legal rates, an estimated 4.9 cents per $100 assessed value (averaging $10 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, under a no-tax-rate-increase financing plan, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23569, "no_votes": 13345, "total_votes": 36914, "percent_yes": 63.84840439941486, "percent_no": 36.15159560058514, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.109083", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.562905", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood school safety/security; upgrade academic, science, technology, engineering, math, vocational classrooms/labs; repair deteriorating plumbing, roofs, electrical systems; remove asbestos/lead paint; shall Hemet Unified School District issue $150 million in bonds at legal rates, an estimated 4.9 cents per $100 assessed value (averaging $10 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, under a no-tax-rate-increase financing plan, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3808, "fingerprint": "2018|201800318|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800318|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cd6fbef478e316d9", "measure_id": "201800318", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the privately proposed measure be adopted allowing an unlimited number of non-retail cannabis businesses in manufacturing zones without a city-issued discretionary approval, subject to limited separation requirements, giving certain cannabis business operators priority over others in establishing their businesses in the City, and taxing cannabis businesses at the rate of $10 / square foot of space used in connection with commercial cannabis activity, estimated to yield $1,000,000 in revenues annually and in perpetuity?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7726, "no_votes": 13066, "total_votes": 20792, "percent_yes": 37.15852250865717, "percent_no": 62.84147749134283, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed unlimited non-retail cannabis businesses in m...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed unlimited non-retail cannabis businesses in manufacturing zones without discretionary city approval and imposed a $10 per square foot tax on cannabis business space. It would have given priority to certain cannabis operators and was estimated to generate $1 million annually in tax revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.104821", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.560171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the privately proposed measure be adopted allowing an unlimited number of non-retail cannabis businesses in manufacturing zones without a city-issued discretionary approval, subject to limited separation requirements, giving certain cannabis business operators priority over others in establishing their businesses in the City, and taxing cannabis businesses at the rate of $10 / square foot of space used in connection with commercial cannabis activity, estimated to yield $1,000,000 in revenues annually and in perpetuity?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3809, "fingerprint": "2018|201800319|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800319|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "913e31dc5f9f570b", "measure_id": "201800319", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City-sponsored measure be adopted establishing a tax on cannabis businesses at the maximum rates of 25% of gross revenues or $30 / square foot of cultivation space, which will apply to illegally operating businesses and, if action is taken after December 31, 2020 to permit cannabis businesses, will apply to legally-established cannabis businesses, estimated to generate at least $3,500,000 annually in perpetuity if cannabis businesses are permitted; and prohibiting cannabis businesses through December 31, 2020?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10838, "no_votes": 9866, "total_votes": 20704, "percent_yes": 52.34737248840804, "percent_no": 47.65262751159196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a tax on cannabis businesses in Riverside at rates u...", "summary_text": "This measure established a tax on cannabis businesses in Riverside at rates up to 25% of gross revenues or $30 per square foot of cultivation space, applying to illegal operations immediately and to legal businesses if the city permits them after December 31, 2020. The measure also prohibited cannabis businesses through December 31, 2020, with estimated annual revenue of at least $3.5 million if cannabis businesses are eventually permitted.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.105194", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.560366", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City-sponsored measure be adopted establishing a tax on cannabis businesses at the maximum rates of 25% of gross revenues or $30 / square foot of cultivation space, which will apply to illegally operating businesses and, if action is taken after December 31, 2020 to permit cannabis businesses, will apply to legally-established cannabis businesses, estimated to generate at least $3,500,000 annually in perpetuity if cannabis businesses are permitted; and prohibiting cannabis businesses through December 31, 2020?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3826, "fingerprint": "2018|201800331|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800331|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "73d96f56f7346c0f", "measure_id": "201800331", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to impose term limits for City Councilmembers by amending the Folsom City Charter to require that after serving 4 consecutive 4-year terms, a City Councilmember is not eligible to run for the City Council or to be appointed to a vacancy unless a period of 4 consecutive years have elapsed since their last service on the City Council, be adopted? No new City powers will result from adoption of the Charter Amendment.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23364, "no_votes": 6192, "total_votes": 29556, "percent_yes": 79.04993909866018, "percent_no": 20.950060901339825, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure amends the Folsom City Charter to impose term limits on City Coun...", "summary_text": "The measure amends the Folsom City Charter to impose term limits on City Councilmembers, requiring them to take a 4-year break from service after serving 4 consecutive 4-year terms before being eligible to run again or be appointed to a vacancy.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.110257", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.563735", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to impose term limits for City Councilmembers by amending the Folsom City Charter to require that after serving 4 consecutive 4-year terms, a City Councilmember is not eligible to run for the City Council or to be appointed to a vacancy unless a period of 4 consecutive years have elapsed since their last service on the City Council, be adopted? No new City powers will result from adoption of the Charter Amendment.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3829, "fingerprint": "2018|201800334|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800334|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "86502254be2472fb", "measure_id": "201800334", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to increase the limit on campaign contribution a person may contribute in support or opposition to a candidate for the Folsom City Council in an election, including contributions to candidate-controlled committees supporting or opposing such candidate, from the current amount of $150 to $500 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14475, "no_votes": 14881, "total_votes": 29356, "percent_yes": 49.30848889494481, "percent_no": 50.69151110505519, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.111100", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.564334", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to increase the limit on campaign contribution a person may contribute in support or opposition to a candidate for the Folsom City Council in an election, including contributions to candidate-controlled committees supporting or opposing such candidate, from the current amount of $150 to $500 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11204, "fingerprint": "2018|201800597|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800597|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "86bba9bd507fafdb", "measure_id": "201800597", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To bring older buildings to code/standards for continued use, improve workforce job training facilities to affordably prepare, train/retrain students/veterans for quality jobs, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, equipment, shall the measure for Sierra Joint Community College District to issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates and levy on average 1.7 cents/$100 assessed value ($18,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with taxpayer oversight/audits, no money for administrator salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4150, "no_votes": 2958, "total_votes": 7108, "percent_yes": 58.38491840180079, "percent_no": 41.61508159819921, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the Sierra Joint Community College District to issue ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the Sierra Joint Community College District to issue $350 million in bonds to repair and construct classrooms and facilities, improve job training facilities, and bring older buildings up to code standards. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes averaging 1.7 cents per $100 of assessed value while the bonds remain outstanding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.583644", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.112009", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.564918", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To bring older buildings to code/standards for continued use, improve workforce job training facilities to affordably prepare, train/retrain students/veterans for quality jobs, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, equipment, shall the measure for Sierra Joint Community College District to issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates and levy on average 1.7 cents/$100 assessed value ($18,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding be adopted, with taxpayer oversight/audits, no money for administrator salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3827, "fingerprint": "2018|201800332|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800332|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "5a1f3d8d395f16e1", "measure_id": "201800332", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to enact a 1/2 percent transaction and use tax (sales tax) for 10 years, providing approximately $8.4 million annually for general governmental purposes such as capital improvement projects for transportation and traffic improvements, parks, trails, and bike paths; promote economic development, fire, paramedic, police emergency response and crime prevention programs; and expand parks, recreation, senior, library, education, arts, cultural and historical programs, requiring independent audits, with funds remaining in Folsom, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8825, "no_votes": 21101, "total_votes": 29926, "percent_yes": 29.48940720443761, "percent_no": 70.51059279556239, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure would have enacted a 0.5% sales tax in Sacramento for 10 years to generate approximately $8.4 million annually for various city services and infrastructure projects including transportation, parks, public safety, and community programs. The measure failed with only 29.5% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.110571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.563945", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to enact a 1/2 percent transaction and use tax (sales tax) for 10 years, providing approximately $8.4 million annually for general governmental purposes such as capital improvement projects for transportation and traffic improvements, parks, trails, and bike paths; promote economic development, fire, paramedic, police emergency response and crime prevention programs; and expand parks, recreation, senior, library, education, arts, cultural and historical programs, requiring independent audits, with funds remaining in Folsom, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3828, "fingerprint": "2018|201800333|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800333|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "fa583e6ca2cb0519", "measure_id": "201800333", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the city clerk for the City of Galt be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3435, "no_votes": 3524, "total_votes": 6959, "percent_yes": 49.36054030751545, "percent_no": 50.63945969248455, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed the position of city clerk in Galt, Californi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed the position of city clerk in Galt, California from an elected office to one appointed by the city government. The measure failed with 49.4% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.110836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.564141", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the city clerk for the City of Galt be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3833, "fingerprint": "2018|201800599|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800599|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "35dc3d673bd692f6", "measure_id": "201800599", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize, construct and acquire classrooms and school facilities, replace portables and older schools with new permanent facilities, improve student safety, modern technology and classroom environments, and qualify for matching State grants, shall Robla Elementary School District issue $46,200,000 in bonds with legal interest rates, estimated annual repayments averaging $2.6 million through maturity, a projected rate of 5.8 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, annual audits, an independent Citizens- Oversight Committee and no money for administrator salaries?\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2678, "no_votes": 1240, "total_votes": 3918, "percent_yes": 68.35119959162839, "percent_no": 31.648800408371613, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.112561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.565304", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize, construct and acquire classrooms and school facilities, replace portables and older schools with new permanent facilities, improve student safety, modern technology and classroom environments, and qualify for matching State grants, shall Robla Elementary School District issue $46,200,000 in bonds with legal interest rates, estimated annual repayments averaging $2.6 million through maturity, a projected rate of 5.8 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, annual audits, an independent Citizens- Oversight Committee and no money for administrator salaries?\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3830, "fingerprint": "2018|201800335|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800335|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "428bbcab94233589", "measure_id": "201800335", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the city charter adding the city auditor as a charter officer; combining duties of the city auditor and the independent budget analyst, as may be further prescribed by ordinance; repealing the city code related to the budget analyst; and amend the charter to allow city council to set an annual meeting calendar by resolution, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78371, "no_votes": 61678, "total_votes": 140049, "percent_yes": 55.95969981934894, "percent_no": 44.04030018065106, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Sacramento's city charter to make the city auditor a cha...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Sacramento's city charter to make the city auditor a charter officer, combined the duties of the city auditor and independent budget analyst, and allowed the city council to set its annual meeting calendar by resolution.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.111429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.564529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the city charter adding the city auditor as a charter officer; combining duties of the city auditor and the independent budget analyst, as may be further prescribed by ordinance; repealing the city code related to the budget analyst; and amend the charter to allow city council to set an annual meeting calendar by resolution, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3832, "fingerprint": "2018|201800598|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800598|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "8c191da3cc328f9a", "measure_id": "201800598", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance quality education in Natomas, increasing student safety/security, upgrading classrooms for 21st century learning and college/career readiness with technology/equipment, upgrading aging infrastructure/utilities and repairing/constructing facilities, shall Natomas Unified School District issue $172,000,000 of bonds with an estimated $11,000,000 in taxes raised annually on average for 32 years at maximum projected tax rates of 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation with citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries/pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16545, "no_votes": 7733, "total_votes": 24278, "percent_yes": 68.14811763736716, "percent_no": 31.851882362632836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.112292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.565108", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance quality education in Natomas, increasing student safety/security, upgrading classrooms for 21st century learning and college/career readiness with technology/equipment, upgrading aging infrastructure/utilities and repairing/constructing facilities, shall Natomas Unified School District issue $172,000,000 of bonds with an estimated $11,000,000 in taxes raised annually on average for 32 years at maximum projected tax rates of 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation with citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries/pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3831, "fingerprint": "2018|201800336|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800336|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "f6148f5626182e08", "measure_id": "201800336", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to protect and enhance essential public safety services, including 9-1-1 response, fire protection, community neighborhood policing, and other essential services, including homeless supportive services, affordable housing, libraries, park maintenance, high-wage job promotion, and youth programming, by enacting a one-cent sales tax generating $95 million annually that is legally required to stay in the City\u2019s General Fund, until ended by voters, with independent annual financial audits and citizen oversight, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86916, "no_votes": 66725, "total_votes": 153641, "percent_yes": 56.57083721142144, "percent_no": 43.42916278857856, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a one-cent sales tax in Sacramento to generate approxima...", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a one-cent sales tax in Sacramento to generate approximately $95 million annually for the city's general fund to support various public services including public safety, homeless services, affordable housing, libraries, parks, and youth programs. The tax includes provisions for annual financial audits and citizen oversight and continues until ended by voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.111740", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.564716", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to protect and enhance essential public safety services, including 9-1-1 response, fire protection, community neighborhood policing, and other essential services, including homeless supportive services, affordable housing, libraries, park maintenance, high-wage job promotion, and youth programming, by enacting a one-cent sales tax generating $95 million annually that is legally required to stay in the City\u2019s General Fund, until ended by voters, with independent annual financial audits and citizen oversight, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3834, "fingerprint": "2018|201800052|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800052|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "99f259270bd62689", "measure_id": "201800052", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance reauthorizing the San Benito County Vehicle Abatement Program and imposing associated vehicle registration fees ($1.00 per vehicle and an additional $2.00 for certain commercial vehicles) for a ten-year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for the purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5333, "no_votes": 6306, "total_votes": 11639, "percent_yes": 45.82008763639488, "percent_no": 54.17991236360512, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have reauthorized San Benito County's Vehicle Abatement Pr...", "summary_text": "This measure would have reauthorized San Benito County's Vehicle Abatement Program for ten years and imposed vehicle registration fees of $1.00 per vehicle and an additional $2.00 for certain commercial vehicles to fund the removal and disposal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles. The measure failed with 45.8% support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.112826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.565499", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance reauthorizing the San Benito County Vehicle Abatement Program and imposing associated vehicle registration fees ($1.00 per vehicle and an additional $2.00 for certain commercial vehicles) for a ten-year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for the purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3835, "fingerprint": "2018|201800053|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800053|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "4f411d13adfa26b3", "measure_id": "201800053", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide and increase County services, such as law enforcement, fire, economic development, roads, and other essential local governmental functions, shall the ordinance to amend the San Benito County Code to (1) increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from eight (8%) to twelve (12%) percent upon persons occupying hotels within the County\u2019s unincorporated area and (2) to amend the definition of \u201coperator\u201d, which revenue can be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6247, "no_votes": 5356, "total_votes": 11603, "percent_yes": 53.83952426096699, "percent_no": 46.16047573903301, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.113127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.565689", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide and increase County services, such as law enforcement, fire, economic development, roads, and other essential local governmental functions, shall the ordinance to amend the San Benito County Code to (1) increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from eight (8%) to twelve (12%) percent upon persons occupying hotels within the County\u2019s unincorporated area and (2) to amend the definition of \u201coperator\u201d, which revenue can be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3836, "fingerprint": "2018|201800054|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800054|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "9bde1db2ff2c5093", "measure_id": "201800054", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance adding Article V of Chapter 5.03 to the San Benito County Code imposing a tax upon cannabis business activities in the unincorporated area of the County based on square footage or gross receipts rates: $3-$17 per ft.2, increased annually based on Consumer Price Index, on cultivators: .5%-4% on distributors/laboratories, 2.5%-4% on manufacturers, .5%-8% on retailers, and 2.5%-5% on microbusiness, which revenue can be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2979, "no_votes": 2167, "total_votes": 5146, "percent_yes": 57.889623008161685, "percent_no": 42.110376991838315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.113426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.565888", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance adding Article V of Chapter 5.03 to the San Benito County Code imposing a tax upon cannabis business activities in the unincorporated area of the County based on square footage or gross receipts rates: $3-$17 per ft.2, increased annually based on Consumer Price Index, on cultivators: .5%-4% on distributors/laboratories, 2.5%-4% on manufacturers, .5%-8% on retailers, and 2.5%-5% on microbusiness, which revenue can be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3837, "fingerprint": "2018|201800055|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800055|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "ed1b560a7580913e", "measure_id": "201800055", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the voters authorize a San Benito County Roads and Transportation Safety and Investment Plan to: repair potholes and maintain roads; widen Highway 25 to relieve traffic congestion and make it safer; improve pedestrian, bicycle, and transit options; and, qualify for state and federal matching funds by enacting a one cent sales tax, raising approximately $16,000,000 annually over 30 years, with annual audits, independent oversight, all funds spent locally, and a detailed expenditure plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13861, "no_votes": 6007, "total_votes": 19868, "percent_yes": 69.76545198308838, "percent_no": 30.234548016911617, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.113694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.566082", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters authorize a San Benito County Roads and Transportation Safety and Investment Plan to: repair potholes and maintain roads; widen Highway 25 to relieve traffic congestion and make it safer; improve pedestrian, bicycle, and transit options; and, qualify for state and federal matching funds by enacting a one cent sales tax, raising approximately $16,000,000 annually over 30 years, with annual audits, independent oversight, all funds spent locally, and a detailed expenditure plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3838, "fingerprint": "2018|201800056|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800056|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "59749037e68b8fd9", "measure_id": "201800056", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide and increase law enforcement, fire services, road maintenance, and other local governmental services, shall the proposed business license tax ordinance be adopted and enacted to impose a business license tax at a rate of $30 to $118 per business, $.66 to $7.80 per employee, and $.10 per ton of minerals depleted, indexed by a COLA, in the unincorporated area of San Benito County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10044, "no_votes": 9279, "total_votes": 19323, "percent_yes": 51.9795062878435, "percent_no": 48.0204937121565, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.113957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.566273", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide and increase law enforcement, fire services, road maintenance, and other local governmental services, shall the proposed business license tax ordinance be adopted and enacted to impose a business license tax at a rate of $30 to $118 per business, $.66 to $7.80 per employee, and $.10 per ton of minerals depleted, indexed by a COLA, in the unincorporated area of San Benito County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3839, "fingerprint": "2018|201800337|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800337|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "868c9056ddde07d0", "measure_id": "201800337", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance adding Title 5, Chapter 5-32 \u201cCannabis Business Activities Tax Ordinance of the City of San Juan Bautista\u201d to the San Juan Bautista Municipal Code imposing an indefinite tax upon cannabis business activities based on square footage: $3-$12 per foot., increased annually based on Consumer Price Index; on distributors: 0.5%-8%; on manufacturers: 2%-8%; on retailers: 3%-10%; on testing laboratories: 1%-5%; and, on microbusiness: 2%-8%; which revenue can be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes and may raise $935,000 annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 444, "no_votes": 235, "total_votes": 679, "percent_yes": 65.39027982326951, "percent_no": 34.60972017673049, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.114230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.566464", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance adding Title 5, Chapter 5-32 \u201cCannabis Business Activities Tax Ordinance of the City of San Juan Bautista\u201d to the San Juan Bautista Municipal Code imposing an indefinite tax upon cannabis business activities based on square footage: $3-$12 per foot., increased annually based on Consumer Price Index; on distributors: 0.5%-8%; on manufacturers: 2%-8%; on retailers: 3%-10%; on testing laboratories: 1%-5%; and, on microbusiness: 2%-8%; which revenue can be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes and may raise $935,000 annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3841, "fingerprint": "2018|201800601|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800601|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "a6ba568ae441129c", "measure_id": "201800601", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade emergency communication systems, safety door locks, security cameras, lighting, repair deteriorating classrooms, restrooms, replace outdated/unsafe portables, electrical wiring, earthquake retrofit classrooms/buildings, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities/equipment, shall this South Monterey County Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $20,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents/$100 assessed valuation, raising approximately $1,400,000 annually for local schools while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizen oversight, audits, without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15, "no_votes": 43, "total_votes": 58, "percent_yes": 25.86206896551724, "percent_no": 74.13793103448276, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.114901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.566870", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade emergency communication systems, safety door locks, security cameras, lighting, repair deteriorating classrooms, restrooms, replace outdated/unsafe portables, electrical wiring, earthquake retrofit classrooms/buildings, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities/equipment, shall this South Monterey County Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $20,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents/$100 assessed valuation, raising approximately $1,400,000 annually for local schools while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizen oversight, audits, without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3842, "fingerprint": "2018|201800602|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800602|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "f492acc762cbeed0", "measure_id": "201800602", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade academic, vocational/agriculture education classrooms, replace outdated science, technology/computer labs, provide classrooms for technology careers, remove hazardous materials like asbestos/lead paint, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities/equipment, shall this South Monterey County Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $20,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2-cents/$100 assessed valuation, approximately $1,400,000 annually for local schools while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizen oversight, audits, without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17, "no_votes": 41, "total_votes": 58, "percent_yes": 29.3103448275862, "percent_no": 70.68965517241381, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.115168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.567063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade academic, vocational/agriculture education classrooms, replace outdated science, technology/computer labs, provide classrooms for technology careers, remove hazardous materials like asbestos/lead paint, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities/equipment, shall this South Monterey County Joint Union High School District measure authorizing $20,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2-cents/$100 assessed valuation, approximately $1,400,000 annually for local schools while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizen oversight, audits, without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3840, "fingerprint": "2018|201800600|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800600|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "37b47530ca0bcc2f", "measure_id": "201800600", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, science, healthcare, technology, engineering/career training labs, repair aging facilities, shall Gavilan Joint Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $248,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents/$100 assessed value, $14,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, constructing, acquiring, repairing classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, Veterans Center, adding a campus in San Benito County, improving local access to affordable education, with citizen oversight, all money locally controlled, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10167, "no_votes": 8655, "total_votes": 18822, "percent_yes": 54.01657634682818, "percent_no": 45.98342365317182, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.114600", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.566667", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, science, healthcare, technology, engineering/career training labs, repair aging facilities, shall Gavilan Joint Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $248,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents/$100 assessed value, $14,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, constructing, acquiring, repairing classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, Veterans Center, adding a campus in San Benito County, improving local access to affordable education, with citizen oversight, all money locally controlled, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 3855, "fingerprint": "2018|201800605|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800605|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "46d77ef73ed6f490", "measure_id": "201800605", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, labs, Veterans Center, career counseling/job training facilities for science, engineering, nursing, industrial careers; improve student safety, access to affordable, high quality education; repair, construct/acquire classrooms, facilities, sites, equipment, shall San Bernardino Community College District's measure authorizing $470,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2.5 cents/$100 assessed value, $28,000,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 109569, "no_votes": 63850, "total_votes": 173419, "percent_yes": 63.1816582958038, "percent_no": 36.8183417041962, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.118845", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.569556", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, labs, Veterans Center, career counseling/job training facilities for science, engineering, nursing, industrial careers; improve student safety, access to affordable, high quality education; repair, construct/acquire classrooms, facilities, sites, equipment, shall San Bernardino Community College District's measure authorizing $470,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2.5 cents/$100 assessed value, $28,000,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with citizen oversight, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3846, "fingerprint": "2018|201800339|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800339|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "50ef213fa26a0deb", "measure_id": "201800339", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, exempting State licensed commercial cannabis operations within certain Town Industrial/Commercial Zoning Districts from the Town's existing prohibition, other than retail sales, dispensaries, microbusiness, or outdoor cannabis cultivation, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1622, "no_votes": 3119, "total_votes": 4741, "percent_yes": 34.21219152077621, "percent_no": 65.7878084792238, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.116334", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.567832", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, exempting State licensed commercial cannabis operations within certain Town Industrial/Commercial Zoning Districts from the Town's existing prohibition, other than retail sales, dispensaries, microbusiness, or outdoor cannabis cultivation, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3845, "fingerprint": "2018|201800338|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800338|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3bfed8e82361aabe", "measure_id": "201800338", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure extending the existing 8% Utility User Tax on telephone, cellular, electricity, gas, sewer, water, and cable television, with no sunset clause, raising approximately $14,200,000 annually, to continue basic and essential services for residents while preserving exemptions for members of very low income households, as defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 50105, and individuals 65 years old or older, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4957, "no_votes": 3557, "total_votes": 8514, "percent_yes": 58.22175240779893, "percent_no": 41.77824759220107, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.116041", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.567640", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure extending the existing 8% Utility User Tax on telephone, cellular, electricity, gas, sewer, water, and cable television, with no sunset clause, raising approximately $14,200,000 annually, to continue basic and essential services for residents while preserving exemptions for members of very low income households, as defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 50105, and individuals 65 years old or older, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3854, "fingerprint": "2018|201800604|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800604|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "cdbd333d5cb2d868", "measure_id": "201800604", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair or replace aging roofs, modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, upgrade aging electrical systems, and replace outdated technology to improve the quality of education, shall the Morongo Unified School District issue $62,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with estimated repayment amounts averaging $3,800,000 annually estimated through 2052, projected average tax rate of 5.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9337, "no_votes": 7670, "total_votes": 17007, "percent_yes": 54.90092314929147, "percent_no": 45.09907685070853, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.118548", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.569366", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair or replace aging roofs, modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, upgrade aging electrical systems, and replace outdated technology to improve the quality of education, shall the Morongo Unified School District issue $62,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with estimated repayment amounts averaging $3,800,000 annually estimated through 2052, projected average tax rate of 5.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3853, "fingerprint": "2018|201800603|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800603|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4054b46cf26a6b4f", "measure_id": "201800603", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade vocational, science, computer, technology classrooms/labs; repair deteriorating classrooms, roofs, gas, electrical, sewer lines; remove asbestos, lead paint; improve Veterans' resources; qualify for State matching funds; shall Chaffey Community College District's measure authorizing $700,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $15/$100,000 assessed valuation, averaging $38,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, be adopted, requiring audits, citizen oversight ?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126808, "no_votes": 88086, "total_votes": 214894, "percent_yes": 59.00955820078736, "percent_no": 40.99044179921264, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.118250", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.569170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade vocational, science, computer, technology classrooms/labs; repair deteriorating classrooms, roofs, gas, electrical, sewer lines; remove asbestos, lead paint; improve Veterans' resources; qualify for State matching funds; shall Chaffey Community College District's measure authorizing $700,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $15/$100,000 assessed valuation, averaging $38,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, be adopted, requiring audits, citizen oversight ?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3848, "fingerprint": "2018|201800341|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800341|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f6e05a944abeab85", "measure_id": "201800341", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for 911 emergency response times, fire protection/ paramedic services, police services; neighborhood patrols; gang, drug, and crime prevention, maintaining streets, parks, senior/youth programs, shall the City of Barstow adopt an ordinance to increase the sales tax by one percent, providing $7 million annually, paid by visitors and residents, requiring resident oversight, independent audits, expiring if local police or fire services are transferred to another agency?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2613, "no_votes": 1799, "total_votes": 4412, "percent_yes": 59.22484134179511, "percent_no": 40.77515865820489, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.116876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.568212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for 911 emergency response times, fire protection/ paramedic services, police services; neighborhood patrols; gang, drug, and crime prevention, maintaining streets, parks, senior/youth programs, shall the City of Barstow adopt an ordinance to increase the sales tax by one percent, providing $7 million annually, paid by visitors and residents, requiring resident oversight, independent audits, expiring if local police or fire services are transferred to another agency?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3849, "fingerprint": "2018|201800342|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800342|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b89a5d90b90aa8dc", "measure_id": "201800342", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Starting with the November 8, 2022 election, shall the Colton City Council be reduced in number from 6 members with an at-large Mayor to 4 members with an at-large Mayor, and shall members of the Colton City Council be elected by 4 districts as described in Ordinance No. O-09-18, which the Mayor of the City of Colton being elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5321, "no_votes": 4469, "total_votes": 9790, "percent_yes": 54.35137895812053, "percent_no": 45.64862104187947, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.117136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.568403", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Starting with the November 8, 2022 election, shall the Colton City Council be reduced in number from 6 members with an at-large Mayor to 4 members with an at-large Mayor, and shall members of the Colton City Council be elected by 4 districts as described in Ordinance No. O-09-18, which the Mayor of the City of Colton being elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3847, "fingerprint": "2018|201800340|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800340|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "32895962a5756f8a", "measure_id": "201800340", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Adelanto adopt an ordinance enacting a tax on cannabis businesses of up to $5.00 per square foot of space utilized for cannabis cultivation and nurseries, and up to 5% of gross receipts from the retail sale, delivery, manufacturing, processing, testing and distribution of cannabis and related products, generating approximately $2,500,000 annually for general City services, such as police and emergency response, parks and youth/senior services, and street repair, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3259, "no_votes": 1303, "total_votes": 4562, "percent_yes": 71.43796580447173, "percent_no": 28.56203419552827, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.116612", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.568022", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Adelanto adopt an ordinance enacting a tax on cannabis businesses of up to $5.00 per square foot of space utilized for cannabis cultivation and nurseries, and up to 5% of gross receipts from the retail sale, delivery, manufacturing, processing, testing and distribution of cannabis and related products, generating approximately $2,500,000 annually for general City services, such as police and emergency response, parks and youth/senior services, and street repair, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3852, "fingerprint": "2018|201800345|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800345|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a59a7450a1eed0ae", "measure_id": "201800345", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure establishing a permanent tax of 1% to 6% of revenues on all commercial cannabis businesses, excepting cultivation, and a tax of up to $15 per square foot of space used for commercial cannabis cultivation per fiscal year as may be increased annually by increases in the consumer price index, to raise approximately $154,000 annually to be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including public safety services and public works improvements, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12312, "no_votes": 7842, "total_votes": 20154, "percent_yes": 61.08961000297708, "percent_no": 38.91038999702292, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.117986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.568980", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure establishing a permanent tax of 1% to 6% of revenues on all commercial cannabis businesses, excepting cultivation, and a tax of up to $15 per square foot of space used for commercial cannabis cultivation per fiscal year as may be increased annually by increases in the consumer price index, to raise approximately $154,000 annually to be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including public safety services and public works improvements, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3850, "fingerprint": "2018|201800343|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800343|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3389abaf5aa9761e", "measure_id": "201800343", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Colton adopt an ordinance enacting a tax on cannabis businesses of up to $25 per square food of space utilized for cannabis cultivation/processing, and up to 10% of gross receipts from the sale of cannabis and related products, generating approximately $2,100,000 annually for general City services, such as police and emergency response, parks and youth/senior services, and street repair, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6864, "no_votes": 3034, "total_votes": 9898, "percent_yes": 69.34734289755507, "percent_no": 30.652657102444934, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.117428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.568598", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Colton adopt an ordinance enacting a tax on cannabis businesses of up to $25 per square food of space utilized for cannabis cultivation/processing, and up to 10% of gross receipts from the sale of cannabis and related products, generating approximately $2,100,000 annually for general City services, such as police and emergency response, parks and youth/senior services, and street repair, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3851, "fingerprint": "2018|201800344|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800344|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a26d68a07418c97a", "measure_id": "201800344", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide approximately $5,000,000 annually in additional funding that will remain under local control for Colton general city services, including police, fire paramedics, parks, libraries, youth and senior services, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a transfer not to exceed 20% of annual electric utility gross revenues to the City of Colton's General Fund, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6347, "no_votes": 3475, "total_votes": 9822, "percent_yes": 64.62024027692934, "percent_no": 35.37975972307066, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.117723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.568791", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide approximately $5,000,000 annually in additional funding that will remain under local control for Colton general city services, including police, fire paramedics, parks, libraries, youth and senior services, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a transfer not to exceed 20% of annual electric utility gross revenues to the City of Colton's General Fund, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3843, "fingerprint": "2018|201800057|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800057|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "568f885713ee4119", "measure_id": "201800057", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance imposing a Cannabis Business Tax of up to $10.00 per square foot for cultivators and up to 6% of gross receipts on other businesses operating in the City of San Bernardino, estimated to initially raise between $810,000 to $2,475,000 annually, with funds staying local for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including but not limited to, police services, street repairs, parks and library services until ended by voters be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23931, "no_votes": 13002, "total_votes": 36933, "percent_yes": 64.79571115262773, "percent_no": 35.20428884737227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.115432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.567255", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance imposing a Cannabis Business Tax of up to $10.00 per square foot for cultivators and up to 6% of gross receipts on other businesses operating in the City of San Bernardino, estimated to initially raise between $810,000 to $2,475,000 annually, with funds staying local for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including but not limited to, police services, street repairs, parks and library services until ended by voters be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3844, "fingerprint": "2018|201800058|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800058|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ace073970631176d", "measure_id": "201800058", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 5.10 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code, to regulate commercial cannabis businesses, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21837, "no_votes": 14361, "total_votes": 36198, "percent_yes": 60.32653737775567, "percent_no": 39.67346262224433, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.115742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.567451", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 5.10 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code, to regulate commercial cannabis businesses, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11206, "fingerprint": "2018|201800346|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800346|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "cf6eb22f63b21d8d", "measure_id": "201800346", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to provide: faster responses to 9-1-1 emergency calls, increase neighborhood police patrols, reduce gang and drug-related crimes, address homelessness, improve firefighter, paramedic and emergency medical response, and general city services, by enacting a \u00bd cent sales tax, until the voters decide otherwise, generating an estimated $17 million annually for City services, with all funds staying in Chula Vista, with citizen oversight and independent audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21126, "no_votes": 19070, "total_votes": 40196, "percent_yes": 52.5574684048164, "percent_no": 47.4425315951836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.589624", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.120850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.570885", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to provide: faster responses to 9-1-1 emergency calls, increase neighborhood police patrols, reduce gang and drug-related crimes, address homelessness, improve firefighter, paramedic and emergency medical response, and general city services, by enacting a \u00bd cent sales tax, until the voters decide otherwise, generating an estimated $17 million annually for City services, with all funds staying in Chula Vista, with citizen oversight and independent audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3858, "fingerprint": "2018|201800061|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800061|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "dabeaa53c531ee4c", "measure_id": "201800061", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter of the County of San Diego be amended for purposes of making \"clean-up\" amendments including amendments necessary to assure compliance with state and federal laws?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 753899, "no_votes": 267187, "total_votes": 1021086, "percent_yes": 73.83305617744244, "percent_no": 26.166943822557556, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.119754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.570127", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the County of San Diego be amended for purposes of making \"clean-up\" amendments including amendments necessary to assure compliance with state and federal laws?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3877, "fingerprint": "2018|201800365|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800365|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "2ff550822b8fd87a", "measure_id": "201800365", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council measure imposing a general tax on potential future cannabis businesses to offset their community impacts by taxing marijuana cultivation at $14/square foot; and gross receipts of marijuana businesses at rates not exceeding 8% on manufacturing and distribution; 10% on medicinal retail; 12% on adult-use retail; and 3.5% on testing; potentially raising $84,000 annually per medicinal distributor until ended by voters; requiring audits and establishing penalties for non-compliance; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14210, "no_votes": 12787, "total_votes": 26997, "percent_yes": 52.635478016075865, "percent_no": 47.364521983924135, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.126174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.574532", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council measure imposing a general tax on potential future cannabis businesses to offset their community impacts by taxing marijuana cultivation at $14/square foot; and gross receipts of marijuana businesses at rates not exceeding 8% on manufacturing and distribution; 10% on medicinal retail; 12% on adult-use retail; and 3.5% on testing; potentially raising $84,000 annually per medicinal distributor until ended by voters; requiring audits and establishing penalties for non-compliance; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11207, "fingerprint": "2018|201800347|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800347|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b91542e5482748b6", "measure_id": "201800347", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted repealing the existing voter-approved limit of three consecutive four-year terms upon the office of the Mayor, and in its place, imposing a limit of two consecutive four-year terms upon the offices of the Mayor, City Councilmembers, City Clerk, and City Treasurer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3023, "no_votes": 3200, "total_votes": 6223, "percent_yes": 48.57785633938615, "percent_no": 51.42214366061385, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.589816", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.121119", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.571088", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted repealing the existing voter-approved limit of three consecutive four-year terms upon the office of the Mayor, and in its place, imposing a limit of two consecutive four-year terms upon the offices of the Mayor, City Councilmembers, City Clerk, and City Treasurer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3859, "fingerprint": "2018|201800062|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800062|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "81e79c70708010fd", "measure_id": "201800062", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the Charter of San Diego County be amended to direct a redistricting commission to maintain the current practice of establishing representative boundaries where at least three Board of Supervisor districts include unincorporated territory, with two of the districts having area predominately outside incorporated cities, as population will permit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 592706, "no_votes": 398971, "total_votes": 991677, "percent_yes": 59.76804947578698, "percent_no": 40.23195052421302, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.120016", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.570314", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter of San Diego County be amended to direct a redistricting commission to maintain the current practice of establishing representative boundaries where at least three Board of Supervisor districts include unincorporated territory, with two of the districts having area predominately outside incorporated cities, as population will permit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3878, "fingerprint": "2018|201800366|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800366|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "0c9f35b072d62cf0", "measure_id": "201800366", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council measure authorizing only the commercial delivery of medicinal cannabis in the City of Vista by up to three non-storefront (delivery only) retailers; authorizing up to two product safety testing laboratories; limiting these business to industrial-type zones; and authorizing and directing the City Council to establish licensing and operating regulations protecting public safety, health, security, and community welfare; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12430, "no_votes": 14346, "total_votes": 26776, "percent_yes": 46.42216910666268, "percent_no": 53.57783089333732, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.126481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.574726", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council measure authorizing only the commercial delivery of medicinal cannabis in the City of Vista by up to three non-storefront (delivery only) retailers; authorizing up to two product safety testing laboratories; limiting these business to industrial-type zones; and authorizing and directing the City Council to establish licensing and operating regulations protecting public safety, health, security, and community welfare; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11208, "fingerprint": "2018|201800348|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800348|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "19ce7dedb40a4b9f", "measure_id": "201800348", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted preserving the existing voter-approved term limit of three consecutive four-year terms upon the office of the Mayor, imposing a limit of three consecutive four-year terms upon the offices of City Councilmembers, City Clerk, and City Treasurer, and limiting the offices of the Mayor, City Councilmembers, City Clerk and City Treasurer to a lifetime total of six four-year terms in all of those offices combined?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3407, "no_votes": 2775, "total_votes": 6182, "percent_yes": 55.1116143642834, "percent_no": 44.8883856357166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.590003", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.121385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.571278", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted preserving the existing voter-approved term limit of three consecutive four-year terms upon the office of the Mayor, imposing a limit of three consecutive four-year terms upon the offices of City Councilmembers, City Clerk, and City Treasurer, and limiting the offices of the Mayor, City Councilmembers, City Clerk and City Treasurer to a lifetime total of six four-year terms in all of those offices combined?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3860, "fingerprint": "2018|201800063|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800063|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d8c47a986a3a19cb", "measure_id": "201800063", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the Charter of San Diego County be amended to require pension stabilization funds be used solely for pension-related liabilities and prohibit using long-term obligations to finance current operations or recurring needs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 704163, "no_votes": 303747, "total_votes": 1007910, "percent_yes": 69.86367830461053, "percent_no": 30.13632169538947, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.120278", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.570505", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter of San Diego County be amended to require pension stabilization funds be used solely for pension-related liabilities and prohibit using long-term obligations to finance current operations or recurring needs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3890, "fingerprint": "2018|201800616|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800616|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "0f800476205bb670", "measure_id": "201800616", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Members of the Southwestern Community College District Governing Board be limited to three (3) terms of office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 116125, "no_votes": 15510, "total_votes": 131635, "percent_yes": 88.21741937934439, "percent_no": 11.782580620655608, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.130001", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.577038", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Members of the Southwestern Community College District Governing Board be limited to three (3) terms of office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11205, "fingerprint": "2018|201800064|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800064|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "aeda49f91c113d4d", "measure_id": "201800064", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall this initiative measure, proposing county charter amendments requiring all elections for San Diego County elective Offices to be held at a general election and requiring adoption of local regulations relating to write-in candidates for county elective office, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 641536, "no_votes": 368889, "total_votes": 1010425, "percent_yes": 63.491699037533714, "percent_no": 36.508300962466286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.589433", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.120544", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.570693", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall this initiative measure, proposing county charter amendments requiring all elections for San Diego County elective Offices to be held at a general election and requiring adoption of local regulations relating to write-in candidates for county elective office, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3856, "fingerprint": "2018|201800059|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800059|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e64006412fa254cc", "measure_id": "201800059", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance to repeal Ordinance 6735 and remove the Fire Protection Tax levy from the properties within the original County Service Area 113?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 128, "no_votes": 25, "total_votes": 153, "percent_yes": 83.66013071895425, "percent_no": 16.33986928104575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.119137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.569746", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance to repeal Ordinance 6735 and remove the Fire Protection Tax levy from the properties within the original County Service Area 113?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3891, "fingerprint": "2018|201800617|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800617|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a04595b62f50347f", "measure_id": "201800617", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade classrooms, libraries, science labs; prepare students for college/careers; expand science, technology, engineering, math instruction; remove hazardous asbestos/lead; fix deteriorating roofs; and improve school safety, shall Sweetwater Union High School District issue $403 million in bonds at legal rates, raising $26 million annually over 30 years at approximately 2 cents/$100 assessed value, with citizen oversight, independent audits, no money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86510, "no_votes": 38603, "total_votes": 125113, "percent_yes": 69.14549247480278, "percent_no": 30.85450752519722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.130320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.577227", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade classrooms, libraries, science labs; prepare students for college/careers; expand science, technology, engineering, math instruction; remove hazardous asbestos/lead; fix deteriorating roofs; and improve school safety, shall Sweetwater Union High School District issue $403 million in bonds at legal rates, raising $26 million annually over 30 years at approximately 2 cents/$100 assessed value, with citizen oversight, independent audits, no money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3870, "fingerprint": "2018|201800358|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800358|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d2af993fbf04476f", "measure_id": "201800358", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City lease Mission Valley stadium property and the San Diego Chargers practice facility on Murphy Canyon Road to a private party for 99 years, with an option to buy some stadium property, consistent with price, terms, and conditions described in the measure; and adopt a specific plan and agreement allowing development of stadium, river park, recreational, residential, office, hotel, retail, and other uses; and amend related land use laws?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 151854, "no_votes": 314427, "total_votes": 466281, "percent_yes": 32.56705720370335, "percent_no": 67.43294279629666, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.124263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.573194", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City lease Mission Valley stadium property and the San Diego Chargers practice facility on Murphy Canyon Road to a private party for 99 years, with an option to buy some stadium property, consistent with price, terms, and conditions described in the measure; and adopt a specific plan and agreement allowing development of stadium, river park, recreational, residential, office, hotel, retail, and other uses; and amend related land use laws?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3880, "fingerprint": "2018|201800606|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800606|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "2fbff9faf773565f", "measure_id": "201800606", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; improve safety and security on all campuses; construct a new high school to reduce student overcrowding; renovate/replace track and field structures and facilities; shall Bonsall Unified School District issue $38,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy approximately 3.75 cents/$100 assessed value, generating approximately $2,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3321, "no_votes": 4491, "total_votes": 7812, "percent_yes": 42.51152073732719, "percent_no": 57.48847926267281, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.127088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.575108", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; improve safety and security on all campuses; construct a new high school to reduce student overcrowding; renovate/replace track and field structures and facilities; shall Bonsall Unified School District issue $38,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy approximately 3.75 cents/$100 assessed value, generating approximately $2,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3871, "fingerprint": "2018|201800359|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800359|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e34753c916130760", "measure_id": "201800359", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City sell Mission Valley stadium property to San Diego State University or any SDSU auxiliary organization, entity, or affiliate, consistent with price, terms, and conditions described in the measure, to allow the California State University Board of Trustees to determine its development, which may include stadium, recreational, educational, residential, office, hotel, retail, and other uses; and if sold, shall the City set aside adjacent land for a river park?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 252839, "no_votes": 211390, "total_votes": 464229, "percent_yes": 54.46428379097385, "percent_no": 45.53571620902615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.124527", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.573387", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City sell Mission Valley stadium property to San Diego State University or any SDSU auxiliary organization, entity, or affiliate, consistent with price, terms, and conditions described in the measure, to allow the California State University Board of Trustees to determine its development, which may include stadium, recreational, educational, residential, office, hotel, retail, and other uses; and if sold, shall the City set aside adjacent land for a river park?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3881, "fingerprint": "2018|201800607|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800607|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "2b68cd68007059f3", "measure_id": "201800607", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make safety and security improvements; shall Borrego Springs Unified School District issue $8,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average $560,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 6 cents per $100 assessed value, have an independent citizens' oversight committee with NO money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 835, "no_votes": 424, "total_votes": 1259, "percent_yes": 66.32247815726767, "percent_no": 33.67752184273233, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.127381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.575297", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make safety and security improvements; shall Borrego Springs Unified School District issue $8,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average $560,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 6 cents per $100 assessed value, have an independent citizens' oversight committee with NO money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3886, "fingerprint": "2018|201800612|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800612|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1523ec71deacfa0f", "measure_id": "201800612", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall City Charter section 66 be amended to limit a member of the San Diego Unified School District Board of Education from serving more than three four-year terms, beginning in 2020, and not count prior or current terms for purposes of the term limit for those School Board members who hold office on the date of the Municipal General Election in 2020?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 260232, "no_votes": 72773, "total_votes": 333005, "percent_yes": 78.14657437576012, "percent_no": 21.853425624239875, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.128828", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.576262", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter section 66 be amended to limit a member of the San Diego Unified School District Board of Education from serving more than three four-year terms, beginning in 2020, and not count prior or current terms for purposes of the term limit for those School Board members who hold office on the date of the Municipal General Election in 2020?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3882, "fingerprint": "2018|201800608|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800608|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e6039612eafb1834", "measure_id": "201800608", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs and technology that support student achievement, college preparation and career skills for math, science, engineering, healthcare and skilled trades; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing/wiring; improve safety and security; renovate, construct, acquire classrooms, sites, equipment/facilities, shall this Carlsbad Unified School District measure authorizing $265,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($13,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with taxpayer oversight, no administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21416, "no_votes": 12844, "total_votes": 34260, "percent_yes": 62.51021599532983, "percent_no": 37.48978400467017, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.127677", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.575494", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs and technology that support student achievement, college preparation and career skills for math, science, engineering, healthcare and skilled trades; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing/wiring; improve safety and security; renovate, construct, acquire classrooms, sites, equipment/facilities, shall this Carlsbad Unified School District measure authorizing $265,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($13,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with taxpayer oversight, no administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3872, "fingerprint": "2018|201800360|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800360|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "39da9083bf3f5e67", "measure_id": "201800360", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: require, for certain contracts, disclosure of the names and identities of all natural persons owning more than 10% of an entity contracting with the City or receiving more than 10% of the contracted amount; require the disclosures to be provided to the Council for contracts requiring Council approval; and exempt public agencies and publicly traded companies from the requirements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 368481, "no_votes": 63451, "total_votes": 431932, "percent_yes": 85.30995619680876, "percent_no": 14.690043803191244, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.124789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.573578", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: require, for certain contracts, disclosure of the names and identities of all natural persons owning more than 10% of an entity contracting with the City or receiving more than 10% of the contracted amount; require the disclosures to be provided to the Council for contracts requiring Council approval; and exempt public agencies and publicly traded companies from the requirements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3885, "fingerprint": "2018|201800611|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800611|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f6e6e9ce2ca53c73", "measure_id": "201800611", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct, renovate and equip classrooms, science labs, and school facilities that support college and career readiness in math, science, engineering, technology and skilled trades; improve school safety/security; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, shall Mountain Empire Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with estimated repayment amounts averaging $840,967 annually for approximately 36 years at projected tax rates averaging 3.7 cents per $100 of assessed value, with annual audits and citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2332, "no_votes": 1878, "total_votes": 4210, "percent_yes": 55.39192399049882, "percent_no": 44.60807600950118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.128502", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.576071", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, renovate and equip classrooms, science labs, and school facilities that support college and career readiness in math, science, engineering, technology and skilled trades; improve school safety/security; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, shall Mountain Empire Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with estimated repayment amounts averaging $840,967 annually for approximately 36 years at projected tax rates averaging 3.7 cents per $100 of assessed value, with annual audits and citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3873, "fingerprint": "2018|201800361|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800361|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a443c51be9d3ef89", "measure_id": "201800361", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter section 12(c) be amended to remove language regarding a \"particular district\" and clarify that a person cannot serve on the City Council after serving two four-year terms, with a partial term of more than two years continuing to count as a full term for purposes of the term limit provision?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 382684, "no_votes": 56967, "total_votes": 439651, "percent_yes": 87.04267703246438, "percent_no": 12.957322967535617, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.125052", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.573771", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter section 12(c) be amended to remove language regarding a \"particular district\" and clarify that a person cannot serve on the City Council after serving two four-year terms, with a partial term of more than two years continuing to count as a full term for purposes of the term limit provision?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3874, "fingerprint": "2018|201800362|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800362|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "70114e67cce9a264", "measure_id": "201800362", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to: (1) restrict benefits for elected City officers; (2) restrict lobbying and campaign activities of elected City officers; and (3) remove the requirement that Councilmembers set their salaries and those of the Mayor and City Attorney, providing instead that their salaries be set as percentages of the salary set by the State of California for Superior Court judges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 340828, "no_votes": 93351, "total_votes": 434179, "percent_yes": 78.49942074582142, "percent_no": 21.500579254178575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.125346", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.573961", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to: (1) restrict benefits for elected City officers; (2) restrict lobbying and campaign activities of elected City officers; and (3) remove the requirement that Councilmembers set their salaries and those of the Mayor and City Attorney, providing instead that their salaries be set as percentages of the salary set by the State of California for Superior Court judges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3892, "fingerprint": "2018|201800618|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800618|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "23ebd419fb35b1c9", "measure_id": "201800618", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, upgrade, equip classrooms, science labs, local school facilities supporting college readiness, career preparation, math, science, engineering, technology, skilled trades; repair aging classrooms/schools including deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical; improve student safety/school security; shall Vista Unified School District Issue $247 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, raising approximately $13 million annually while bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, requiring citizen oversight, all funds for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32661, "no_votes": 18203, "total_votes": 50864, "percent_yes": 64.21240956275558, "percent_no": 35.78759043724442, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.130587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.577425", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, upgrade, equip classrooms, science labs, local school facilities supporting college readiness, career preparation, math, science, engineering, technology, skilled trades; repair aging classrooms/schools including deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical; improve student safety/school security; shall Vista Unified School District Issue $247 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, raising approximately $13 million annually while bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, requiring citizen oversight, all funds for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3875, "fingerprint": "2018|201800363|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800363|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "baf9cf97be740312", "measure_id": "201800363", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter section 39.1 be amended to allow the City Council to waive a requirement that the Council consider at least two applicants for appointment to a position as a public member of the Audit Committee, when the Council wishes to reappoint a sitting public member who is eligible for another term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 248018, "no_votes": 167190, "total_votes": 415208, "percent_yes": 59.73343480857787, "percent_no": 40.26656519142213, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.125642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.574151", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter section 39.1 be amended to allow the City Council to waive a requirement that the Council consider at least two applicants for appointment to a position as a public member of the Audit Committee, when the Council wishes to reappoint a sitting public member who is eligible for another term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3884, "fingerprint": "2018|201800610|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800610|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b8511f0f0b54b518", "measure_id": "201800610", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Del Mar neighborhood elementary schools, repair/upgrade/reconstruct deteriorated school facilities, plumbing, roofs, electrical systems, renovate classrooms supporting science, engineering, math, arts instruction; improve safety/security and technology infrastructure; and construct/equip a new elementary school; shall Del Mar Union School District issue $186 million in bonds at legal rates, raising $10.4 million annually over 32 years at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, with independent citizens' oversight, mandatory audits, all money for Del Mar K-6 schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11771, "no_votes": 7481, "total_votes": 19252, "percent_yes": 61.1416995636817, "percent_no": 38.8583004363183, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.128234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.575879", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Del Mar neighborhood elementary schools, repair/upgrade/reconstruct deteriorated school facilities, plumbing, roofs, electrical systems, renovate classrooms supporting science, engineering, math, arts instruction; improve safety/security and technology infrastructure; and construct/equip a new elementary school; shall Del Mar Union School District issue $186 million in bonds at legal rates, raising $10.4 million annually over 32 years at approximately 3 cents per $100 of assessed value, with independent citizens' oversight, mandatory audits, all money for Del Mar K-6 schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3876, "fingerprint": "2018|201800364|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800364|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "11846589e794ed64", "measure_id": "201800364", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the San Diego Municipal Code be amended to reinstate an industrial disability retirement benefit for members of the San Diego Police Officers Association who suffer a violent attack at work resulting in great bodily harm, with the benefit provided when a resulting mental or nervous disorder renders the member incapable of performing normal and customary duties?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 343070, "no_votes": 95411, "total_votes": 438481, "percent_yes": 78.24056230486612, "percent_no": 21.759437695133883, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.125908", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.574339", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Diego Municipal Code be amended to reinstate an industrial disability retirement benefit for members of the San Diego Police Officers Association who suffer a violent attack at work resulting in great bodily harm, with the benefit provided when a resulting mental or nervous disorder renders the member incapable of performing normal and customary duties?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3889, "fingerprint": "2018|201800615|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800615|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "cc19136f61dd3580", "measure_id": "201800615", "measure_letter": "NN", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve access to preschool education by rebuilding and increasing capacity at VIP Village Preschool, including constructing new classrooms and school facilities, and renovating existing restrooms, shall South Bay Union School District issue $18 million in general obligation bond at legal rates, under a plan that will not increase exiting tax rates with an estimated levy of 2 cents per $100 of assessed valuation (averaging $1.5 million annually through 2042), independent taxpayer oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12464, "no_votes": 5810, "total_votes": 18274, "percent_yes": 68.20619459341141, "percent_no": 31.79380540658859, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.129738", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.576847", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve access to preschool education by rebuilding and increasing capacity at VIP Village Preschool, including constructing new classrooms and school facilities, and renovating existing restrooms, shall South Bay Union School District issue $18 million in general obligation bond at legal rates, under a plan that will not increase exiting tax rates with an estimated levy of 2 cents per $100 of assessed valuation (averaging $1.5 million annually through 2042), independent taxpayer oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3862, "fingerprint": "2018|201800350|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800350|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "fed6a0db56806bce", "measure_id": "201800350", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the City Charter of the City of Del Mar (Sections 201 and 202), to establish greater local control regarding land use and zoning where consistent with the City's General Plan (Community Plan) and where provided by State law, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1385, "no_votes": 965, "total_votes": 2350, "percent_yes": 58.93617021276596, "percent_no": 41.06382978723404, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.122000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.571661", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the City Charter of the City of Del Mar (Sections 201 and 202), to establish greater local control regarding land use and zoning where consistent with the City's General Plan (Community Plan) and where provided by State law, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3861, "fingerprint": "2018|201800349|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800349|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e4333f634f9b0ae4", "measure_id": "201800349", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to impose a business license tax of at least 5%, and up to 15%, of gross receipts on cannabis (marijuana) businesses, and at least $5, and up to $25, per square foot on space dedicated to cannabis cultivation, to raise an estimated $6,000,000 per year, until voters change or repeal it, to fund general City services, including enforcement efforts against cannabis business that are operating illegally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48607, "no_votes": 26965, "total_votes": 75572, "percent_yes": 64.31879532101836, "percent_no": 35.68120467898164, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.121698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.571471", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to impose a business license tax of at least 5%, and up to 15%, of gross receipts on cannabis (marijuana) businesses, and at least $5, and up to $25, per square foot on space dedicated to cannabis cultivation, to raise an estimated $6,000,000 per year, until voters change or repeal it, to fund general City services, including enforcement efforts against cannabis business that are operating illegally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3863, "fingerprint": "2018|201800351|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800351|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1ba83566a5dab37b", "measure_id": "201800351", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure proposing to amend development regulations for beachfront properties in Del Mar to exclude any area designated as a \"Shoreline Protection Area\" from the calculation of floor area ratio, which is used to determine maximum allowable construction and development, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 449, "no_votes": 1988, "total_votes": 2437, "percent_yes": 18.424292162494872, "percent_no": 81.57570783750512, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.122299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.571852", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure proposing to amend development regulations for beachfront properties in Del Mar to exclude any area designated as a \"Shoreline Protection Area\" from the calculation of floor area ratio, which is used to determine maximum allowable construction and development, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3857, "fingerprint": "2018|201800060|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800060|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5c379e23a05511f1", "measure_id": "201800060", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Rincon Ranch Community Services District be authorized to establish and levy a special tax override, on all taxable real property within its boundaries for the purpose of providing funds for repair and resurface of the roads maintained by the District, with this special tax not to exceed six dollars and ninety-two cents ($6.92) per acre, or portion thereof, plus one hundred ninety-nine dollars and fifty cents ($199.50) per parcel of land per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46, "no_votes": 30, "total_votes": 76, "percent_yes": 60.526315789473685, "percent_no": 39.473684210526315, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.119490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.569937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Rincon Ranch Community Services District be authorized to establish and levy a special tax override, on all taxable real property within its boundaries for the purpose of providing funds for repair and resurface of the roads maintained by the District, with this special tax not to exceed six dollars and ninety-two cents ($6.92) per acre, or portion thereof, plus one hundred ninety-nine dollars and fifty cents ($199.50) per parcel of land per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3888, "fingerprint": "2018|201800614|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800614|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b0e7c315ce44651b", "measure_id": "201800614", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct, modernize, update and equip Santee elementary and junior high school classrooms and educational facilities, shall $15,370,000 of Santee School District bonds, approved by voters in 2006, be reauthorized as new bonds, with legal rates, projected average annual levies of $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation for approximately eight years (an estimated $2.2 million raised annually), citizens\u2019 oversight, audits, no increase in total District debt, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13778, "no_votes": 8935, "total_votes": 22713, "percent_yes": 60.66129529344428, "percent_no": 39.33870470655572, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.129469", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.576645", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, modernize, update and equip Santee elementary and junior high school classrooms and educational facilities, shall $15,370,000 of Santee School District bonds, approved by voters in 2006, be reauthorized as new bonds, with legal rates, projected average annual levies of $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation for approximately eight years (an estimated $2.2 million raised annually), citizens\u2019 oversight, audits, no increase in total District debt, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3864, "fingerprint": "2018|201800352|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800352|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6471875f7f5b6010", "measure_id": "201800352", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure proposing Ordinance 939, rescinding the Garden Del Mar Specific Plan and adopting the 941 Camino Del Mar Specific Plan, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1898, "no_votes": 476, "total_votes": 2374, "percent_yes": 79.94945240101096, "percent_no": 20.05054759898904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.122566", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.572044", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure proposing Ordinance 939, rescinding the Garden Del Mar Specific Plan and adopting the 941 Camino Del Mar Specific Plan, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3865, "fingerprint": "2018|201800353|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800353|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "75107b0fbcd6a3a3", "measure_id": "201800353", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters adopt the Housing Plan Update 2018 to amend the General Plan, Specific Plans, Zoning Code, Zoning Map, and Local Coastal Program to identify sites for new housing and change zoning standards for those sites?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14120, "no_votes": 15882, "total_votes": 30002, "percent_yes": 47.06352909806013, "percent_no": 52.93647090193987, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.122832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.572236", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters adopt the Housing Plan Update 2018 to amend the General Plan, Specific Plans, Zoning Code, Zoning Map, and Local Coastal Program to identify sites for new housing and change zoning standards for those sites?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3866, "fingerprint": "2018|201800354|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800354|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "810eaffbe769a1fc", "measure_id": "201800354", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal expenses including police and fire, roads, and recreation; shall the City tax cannabis businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation and 6% of gross receipts for all other businesses, generating an estimated $1,500,000 to $2,000,000 annually; authorize the City Council to implement this tax by resolution or ordinance; and levy this tax until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15862, "no_votes": 5789, "total_votes": 21651, "percent_yes": 73.2622049789848, "percent_no": 26.737795021015202, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.123099", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.572426", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal expenses including police and fire, roads, and recreation; shall the City tax cannabis businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation and 6% of gross receipts for all other businesses, generating an estimated $1,500,000 to $2,000,000 annually; authorize the City Council to implement this tax by resolution or ordinance; and levy this tax until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3883, "fingerprint": "2018|201800609|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800609|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "24fc5f36f484355a", "measure_id": "201800609", "measure_letter": "VV", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make school safety, security, technology and energy efficiency improvements; repair, construct, acquire and equip classrooms and educational facilities and reduce overcrowding; and replace aging plumbing, sewer and electrical systems shall Chula Vista Elementary School District issue $150 million in bonds at legal rates, levy $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation (raising an average of $10 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with taxpayer oversight, annual audits and no projected increase in the District's current bond tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59235, "no_votes": 28199, "total_votes": 87434, "percent_yes": 67.74824439005421, "percent_no": 32.25175560994579, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.127959", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.575685", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make school safety, security, technology and energy efficiency improvements; repair, construct, acquire and equip classrooms and educational facilities and reduce overcrowding; and replace aging plumbing, sewer and electrical systems shall Chula Vista Elementary School District issue $150 million in bonds at legal rates, levy $0.02 per $100 of assessed valuation (raising an average of $10 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with taxpayer oversight, annual audits and no projected increase in the District's current bond tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3867, "fingerprint": "2018|201800355|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800355|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "69786c3dda6274d1", "measure_id": "201800355", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a Program of Residential Rent Control, including just cause for eviction and rent stabilization provisions, and creating a five-member Rent Board to administer and enforce the program?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5960, "no_votes": 6115, "total_votes": 12075, "percent_yes": 49.35817805383022, "percent_no": 50.64182194616978, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.123360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.572619", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a Program of Residential Rent Control, including just cause for eviction and rent stabilization provisions, and creating a five-member Rent Board to administer and enforce the program?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3869, "fingerprint": "2018|201800357|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800357|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "abc17e10e682e2d3", "measure_id": "201800357", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding to maintain and improve general city services including: police patrols, crime, drug, and gang prevention, fire , paramedic and 9-1-1 response, pothole repair, street maintenance, improved infrastructure, maintain safe, clean parks and beaches, and address homelessness, shall the City of Oceanside establish a sales tax of one-half of percent (0.5%) for 7 years, providing an estimated 11 million dollars annually for general city services, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34133, "no_votes": 27166, "total_votes": 61299, "percent_yes": 55.68280069821694, "percent_no": 44.31719930178306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.123970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.573001", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding to maintain and improve general city services including: police patrols, crime, drug, and gang prevention, fire , paramedic and 9-1-1 response, pothole repair, street maintenance, improved infrastructure, maintain safe, clean parks and beaches, and address homelessness, shall the City of Oceanside establish a sales tax of one-half of percent (0.5%) for 7 years, providing an estimated 11 million dollars annually for general city services, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3868, "fingerprint": "2018|201800356|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800356|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f7d3b0c085017b78", "measure_id": "201800356", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure Amending the Land Use Element of the Oceanside General Plan to Require Voter Approval of Proposals to Change the Land Use Designation or Zoning of Agricultural or Open Space Land to Any Other Use be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28729, "no_votes": 32228, "total_votes": 60957, "percent_yes": 47.12994405892678, "percent_no": 52.87005594107322, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.123625", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.572812", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure Amending the Land Use Element of the Oceanside General Plan to Require Voter Approval of Proposals to Change the Land Use Designation or Zoning of Agricultural or Open Space Land to Any Other Use be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3887, "fingerprint": "2018|201800613|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800613|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e1ba3151cb3a7fb9", "measure_id": "201800613", "measure_letter": "YY", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall San Diego Unified School District issue $3.5 billion in bonds at legal rates, projecting levy of 6-cents per $100 of assessed valuation for 39 years, estimating $193 million average annual repayments, requiring independent annual audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 224262, "no_votes": 120311, "total_votes": 344573, "percent_yes": 65.08403154048634, "percent_no": 34.915968459513664, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.129195", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.576455", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall San Diego Unified School District issue $3.5 billion in bonds at legal rates, projecting levy of 6-cents per $100 of assessed valuation for 39 years, estimating $193 million average annual repayments, requiring independent annual audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3879, "fingerprint": "2018|201800367|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800367|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "96ada1282476d7b9", "measure_id": "201800367", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the citizen measure authorizing the commercial storefront retail sales of medicinal cannabis by up to 11 retailers in the City of Vista to be located in any of Vista's commercial, industrial, business park, and mixed use zoning districts; and imposing a 7% special use tax on gross receipts potentially raising $117,600 per dispensary annually until ended by voters; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14900, "no_votes": 12789, "total_votes": 27689, "percent_yes": 53.81198309798116, "percent_no": 46.18801690201884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.126802", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.574915", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the citizen measure authorizing the commercial storefront retail sales of medicinal cannabis by up to 11 retailers in the City of Vista to be located in any of Vista's commercial, industrial, business park, and mixed use zoning districts; and imposing a 7% special use tax on gross receipts potentially raising $117,600 per dispensary annually until ended by voters; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11209, "fingerprint": "2018|201800075|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800075|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "c2fa77c173972a9a", "measure_id": "201800075", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect the waterfront, BART and Muni, buildings, historic piers, and roads from earthquakes, flooding and rising seas by: repairing the 100 year old Embarcadero Seawall; strengthening the Embarcadero; and fortifying transit infrastructure and utilities serving residents and businesses; shall the city issue $425,000,000 in bonds, with a duration up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated tax rate of $0.013/$100 of assessed property value, and estimated annual revenues of up to $40,000,000, with citizen oversight and regular audits? The City\u2019s current debt management policy is to keep the property tax rate from City general obligation bonds below the 2006 rate by issuing new bonds as older ones are retired and the tax base grows, though the overall property tax rate may vary based on other factors.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 288146, "no_votes": 60276, "total_votes": 348422, "percent_yes": 82.70028873033276, "percent_no": 17.29971126966724, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.598181", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.134168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.579650", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the waterfront, BART and Muni, buildings, historic piers, and roads from earthquakes, flooding and rising seas by: repairing the 100 year old Embarcadero Seawall; strengthening the Embarcadero; and fortifying transit infrastructure and utilities serving residents and businesses; shall the city issue $425,000,000 in bonds, with a duration up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated tax rate of $0.013/$100 of assessed property value, and estimated annual revenues of up to $40,000,000, with citizen oversight and regular audits? The City\u2019s current debt management policy is to keep the property tax rate from City general obligation bonds below the 2006 rate by issuing new bonds as older ones are retired and the tax base grows, though the overall property tax rate may vary based on other factors.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3894, "fingerprint": "2018|201800066|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800066|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9f20989c1de9a797", "measure_id": "201800066", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City authorize the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to issue revenue bonds to build or improve the City\u2019s clean power facilities, with approval by two-thirds of the Board of Supervisors, and prohibit the PUC from financing construction of power plants that generate electricity from fossil fuels or nuclear power?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 181638, "no_votes": 53572, "total_votes": 235210, "percent_yes": 77.22375749330385, "percent_no": 22.77624250669615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.131193", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.577807", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City authorize the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to issue revenue bonds to build or improve the City\u2019s clean power facilities, with approval by two-thirds of the Board of Supervisors, and prohibit the PUC from financing construction of power plants that generate electricity from fossil fuels or nuclear power?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11210, "fingerprint": "2018|201800076|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800076|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f668b473c11a372e", "measure_id": "201800076", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to include privacy guidelines and require the City Administrator to propose a privacy ordinance consistent with the guidelines to the Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 186758, "no_votes": 137592, "total_votes": 324350, "percent_yes": 57.57915831663326, "percent_no": 42.42084168336674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.598367", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.134474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.579950", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to include privacy guidelines and require the City Administrator to propose a privacy ordinance consistent with the guidelines to the Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3895, "fingerprint": "2018|201800067|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800067|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "13be4e3ed78b71e9", "measure_id": "201800067", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City require appointed members of boards and commissions established by the Charter to forfeit their appointed seat when they file to run for state or local elective office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 160214, "no_votes": 69570, "total_votes": 229784, "percent_yes": 69.72374055634857, "percent_no": 30.276259443651426, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.131461", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.578005", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City require appointed members of boards and commissions established by the Charter to forfeit their appointed seat when they file to run for state or local elective office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11211, "fingerprint": "2018|201800077|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800077|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "08e9bec5f0f9570a", "measure_id": "201800077", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City impose additional business taxes to create a dedicated fund to support services for homeless people and prevent homelessness, including one tax of 0.175% to 0.69% on gross receipts over $50 million that a business receives in San Francisco, and another tax of 1.5% on certain administrative offices\u2019 payroll expense in San Francisco, raising an estimated $250\u2013300 million in combined tax revenues annually, and with no expiration date for these taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 215491, "no_votes": 135835, "total_votes": 351326, "percent_yes": 61.33647950905996, "percent_no": 38.66352049094004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.598554", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.134758", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.580217", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City impose additional business taxes to create a dedicated fund to support services for homeless people and prevent homelessness, including one tax of 0.175% to 0.69% on gross receipts over $50 million that a business receives in San Francisco, and another tax of 1.5% on certain administrative offices\u2019 payroll expense in San Francisco, raising an estimated $250\u2013300 million in combined tax revenues annually, and with no expiration date for these taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3896, "fingerprint": "2018|201800068|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800068|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f950c8904fcbf6ff", "measure_id": "201800068", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City impose a new gross receipts tax of 1% on revenues a business receives from leasing warehouse space in San Francisco, and 3.5% on revenues a business receives from leasing some commercial spaces in San Francisco, to fund quality early care and education for young children and for other public purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120199, "no_votes": 116085, "total_votes": 236284, "percent_yes": 50.87056254338, "percent_no": 49.12943745662, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.132085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.578193", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City impose a new gross receipts tax of 1% on revenues a business receives from leasing warehouse space in San Francisco, and 3.5% on revenues a business receives from leasing some commercial spaces in San Francisco, to fund quality early care and education for young children and for other public purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11212, "fingerprint": "2018|201800078|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800078|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "4c4199d52c25ebba", "measure_id": "201800078", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City impose new cannabis business taxes beginning in 2021, at rates ranging from 1% to 5% on gross receipts of cannabis businesses in San Francisco, where the Board of Supervisors could decrease those rates, or increase them up to 7%; and shall the City apply many of its business taxes to businesses with over $500,000 in gross receipts in San Francisco that do not have a physical presence here; raising an estimated $2\u20134 million annually in combined tax revenues in 2019 and 2020, and an estimated $7\u201316 million annually beginning in 2021, and with no expiration date on these newly imposed and applied taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 227250, "no_votes": 118815, "total_votes": 346065, "percent_yes": 65.66685449265312, "percent_no": 34.333145507346885, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.598853", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.135033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.580500", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City impose new cannabis business taxes beginning in 2021, at rates ranging from 1% to 5% on gross receipts of cannabis businesses in San Francisco, where the Board of Supervisors could decrease those rates, or increase them up to 7%; and shall the City apply many of its business taxes to businesses with over $500,000 in gross receipts in San Francisco that do not have a physical presence here; raising an estimated $2\u20134 million annually in combined tax revenues in 2019 and 2020, and an estimated $7\u201316 million annually beginning in 2021, and with no expiration date on these newly imposed and applied taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3897, "fingerprint": "2018|201800069|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800069|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "06f57cd2811ca169", "measure_id": "201800069", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City impose a new gross receipts tax of 1.7% on revenues a business receives from leasing some commercial spaces in San Francisco, to fund homeless services, housing for extremely low- to middle-income households and for other public purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 105746, "no_votes": 129611, "total_votes": 235357, "percent_yes": 44.93004244615626, "percent_no": 55.06995755384374, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.132529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.578394", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City impose a new gross receipts tax of 1.7% on revenues a business receives from leasing some commercial spaces in San Francisco, to fund homeless services, housing for extremely low- to middle-income households and for other public purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11213, "fingerprint": "2018|201800079|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800079|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "8f876c3044d66607", "measure_id": "201800079", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City annually distribute up to 1.5% of the current base hotel tax for specific arts and cultural purposes, without increasing the existing hotel tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 258343, "no_votes": 85585, "total_votes": 343928, "percent_yes": 75.11543113674955, "percent_no": 24.88456886325045, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.599073", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.135363", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.580775", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City annually distribute up to 1.5% of the current base hotel tax for specific arts and cultural purposes, without increasing the existing hotel tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3898, "fingerprint": "2018|201800070|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800070|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3b40ef17d2970406", "measure_id": "201800070", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City ordinance prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products in San Francisco take effect?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 164844, "no_votes": 76193, "total_votes": 241037, "percent_yes": 68.38950036716355, "percent_no": 31.61049963283645, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.132815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.578586", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City ordinance prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products in San Francisco take effect?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3899, "fingerprint": "2018|201800071|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800071|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3e10d235f0938230", "measure_id": "201800071", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City establish, fund and run a program to provide legal representation for all residential tenants in San Francisco facing eviction?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 133190, "no_votes": 105774, "total_votes": 238964, "percent_yes": 55.736428918163405, "percent_no": 44.263571081836595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.133087", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.578775", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City establish, fund and run a program to provide legal representation for all residential tenants in San Francisco facing eviction?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3900, "fingerprint": "2018|201800072|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800072|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "61ce8a9473725e84", "measure_id": "201800072", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City collect an annual tax of $298 per parcel for investment in education, subject to certain exemptions including those for senior citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 144686, "no_votes": 93447, "total_votes": 238133, "percent_yes": 60.75848370448447, "percent_no": 39.24151629551553, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.133354", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.578962", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City collect an annual tax of $298 per parcel for investment in education, subject to certain exemptions including those for senior citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3901, "fingerprint": "2018|201800073|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800073|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3063132201dd8172", "measure_id": "201800073", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City set a policy for when police officers can use tasers and authorize the Police Department to purchase tasers for all officers, subject to specific conditions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 90334, "no_votes": 146997, "total_votes": 237331, "percent_yes": 38.062452861193854, "percent_no": 61.937547138806146, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.133623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.579154", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City set a policy for when police officers can use tasers and authorize the Police Department to purchase tasers for all officers, subject to specific conditions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3902, "fingerprint": "2018|201800074|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800074|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f1f5fc4734fec897", "measure_id": "201800074", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City adopt a policy not to encourage professional sports teams from other cities to move to San Francisco and to oppose any sports team ownership group attempting to avoid payment of an outstanding public debt?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97863, "no_votes": 130916, "total_votes": 228779, "percent_yes": 42.77621634852849, "percent_no": 57.22378365147151, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.133888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.579345", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City adopt a policy not to encourage professional sports teams from other cities to move to San Francisco and to oppose any sports team ownership group attempting to avoid payment of an outstanding public debt?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3893, "fingerprint": "2018|201800065|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800065|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f4af79b0371f2d65", "measure_id": "201800065", "measure_letter": "RM3", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 153812, "no_votes": 81383, "total_votes": 235195, "percent_yes": 65.39764875953996, "percent_no": 34.60235124046004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.130887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.577616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3903, "fingerprint": "2018|201800080|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800080|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "abd75d6e037a3ddf", "measure_id": "201800080", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To support early childhood education, drug prevention, literacy, and other programs for children and\r\nyouth; public health; public safety and enforcement of cannabis laws; shall an ordinance imposing a\r\nspecial tax on commercial cannabis businesses in unincorporated San Joaquin County at a rate of 3.5% to 8% of gross receipts, with an additional cultivation Square Footage Payment of $2.00 per square foot of cultivation space annually adjusted by Consumer Price Index (CPI) thereafter, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 119256, "no_votes": 68430, "total_votes": 187686, "percent_yes": 63.54016815319204, "percent_no": 36.45983184680796, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.135633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.581067", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support early childhood education, drug prevention, literacy, and other programs for children and\r\nyouth; public health; public safety and enforcement of cannabis laws; shall an ordinance imposing a\r\nspecial tax on commercial cannabis businesses in unincorporated San Joaquin County at a rate of 3.5% to 8% of gross receipts, with an additional cultivation Square Footage Payment of $2.00 per square foot of cultivation space annually adjusted by Consumer Price Index (CPI) thereafter, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3909, "fingerprint": "2018|201800619|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800619|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "82cf8c002f888437", "measure_id": "201800619", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and improve our schools; upgrade fire alarms, repair leaky pipes and roofs and rehabilitate existing classrooms, shall $156.38 million of Stockton Unified School District\u2019s bonds, approved in 2008, be reauthorized as new bonds, with legal rates, an average tax levy of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (averaging $10.8 million per year), annual audits, independent taxpayer oversight and no increase in total authorized District debt or current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12179, "no_votes": 7074, "total_votes": 19253, "percent_yes": 63.25767412870722, "percent_no": 36.74232587129278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.137372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.582802", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and improve our schools; upgrade fire alarms, repair leaky pipes and roofs and rehabilitate existing classrooms, shall $156.38 million of Stockton Unified School District\u2019s bonds, approved in 2008, be reauthorized as new bonds, with legal rates, an average tax levy of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding (averaging $10.8 million per year), annual audits, independent taxpayer oversight and no increase in total authorized District debt or current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3907, "fingerprint": "2018|201800371|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800371|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "1afa822bb6eb8fd9", "measure_id": "201800371", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Tracy adopt an ordinance establishing a special tax on cannabis businesses at annual rates, not to exceed $12.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjusted for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $35,000 to $100,000 annually to fund police and code enforcement services and that shall be levied until repealed by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16187, "no_votes": 9819, "total_votes": 26006, "percent_yes": 62.24332846266246, "percent_no": 37.75667153733754, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.136831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.582275", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Tracy adopt an ordinance establishing a special tax on cannabis businesses at annual rates, not to exceed $12.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjusted for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $35,000 to $100,000 annually to fund police and code enforcement services and that shall be levied until repealed by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3910, "fingerprint": "2018|201800620|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800620|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "d8060514dd8a119b", "measure_id": "201800620", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare our students for college, careers and jobs by modernizing schools, improving access to technology and learning, and constructing a new stadium and all-weather track for year-round use, shall Escalon Unified School District be authorized to issue $25,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of approximately $1,620,000 annually to repay issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation, requiring oversight, audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2488, "no_votes": 2661, "total_votes": 5149, "percent_yes": 48.3200621479899, "percent_no": 51.6799378520101, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.137642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.583061", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare our students for college, careers and jobs by modernizing schools, improving access to technology and learning, and constructing a new stadium and all-weather track for year-round use, shall Escalon Unified School District be authorized to issue $25,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of approximately $1,620,000 annually to repay issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 of assessed valuation, requiring oversight, audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3911, "fingerprint": "2018|201800621|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800621|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "f13a836168611e56", "measure_id": "201800621", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade educational facilities, shall Linden Unified School District:  modernize classrooms and science labs; improve safety and security; modernize, construct and equip school and support facilities; update athletic facilities; improve parking and energy usage; and payoff outstanding liabilities; by issuing $31,200,000 in bonds repaying an annual average of $2,114,000 for 34 years at approximately $59.82 per $100,000 of assessed value, at legal interest rates with independent oversight, no funding for employee salaries, and all funds staying in District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1804, "no_votes": 2229, "total_votes": 4033, "percent_yes": 44.7309695016117, "percent_no": 55.2690304983883, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.137961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.583302", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade educational facilities, shall Linden Unified School District:  modernize classrooms and science labs; improve safety and security; modernize, construct and equip school and support facilities; update athletic facilities; improve parking and energy usage; and payoff outstanding liabilities; by issuing $31,200,000 in bonds repaying an annual average of $2,114,000 for 34 years at approximately $59.82 per $100,000 of assessed value, at legal interest rates with independent oversight, no funding for employee salaries, and all funds staying in District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3912, "fingerprint": "2018|201800622|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800622|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "a80334d912a3002b", "measure_id": "201800622", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide students with improved learning environments, build classrooms to maintain smaller classes, replace older portable classrooms with permanent buildings, construct science labs, and improve career technical facilities, shall Ripon Unified School District be authorized to issue $38,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of approximately $2,400,000 annually to repay issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.036 per $100 of assessed valuation, requiring a citizen\u2019s oversight committee, audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3992, "no_votes": 4164, "total_votes": 8156, "percent_yes": 48.9455615497793, "percent_no": 51.0544384502207, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.138235", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.583549", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide students with improved learning environments, build classrooms to maintain smaller classes, replace older portable classrooms with permanent buildings, construct science labs, and improve career technical facilities, shall Ripon Unified School District be authorized to issue $38,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of approximately $2,400,000 annually to repay issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.036 per $100 of assessed valuation, requiring a citizen\u2019s oversight committee, audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3905, "fingerprint": "2018|201800369|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800369|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c2bd5194bbd99448", "measure_id": "201800369", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adopting a City of Manteca ordinance to increase an ongoing transient occupancy tax (TOT - hotel tax) from 9% to 12% on hotel charges, increasing the existing hotel tax by 3%, generating an estimated $450,000 to provide essential public services and improvements needed to support our City, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13664, "no_votes": 9961, "total_votes": 23625, "percent_yes": 57.83703703703704, "percent_no": 42.16296296296296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.136282", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.581729", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adopting a City of Manteca ordinance to increase an ongoing transient occupancy tax (TOT - hotel tax) from 9% to 12% on hotel charges, increasing the existing hotel tax by 3%, generating an estimated $450,000 to provide essential public services and improvements needed to support our City, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3906, "fingerprint": "2018|201800370|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800370|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "447402a9766da769", "measure_id": "201800370", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing local taxes, and only by using existing affordable housing funding, shall public or publicly assisted housing providers within the City of Stockton, according to the City\u2019s General Plan, construct, develop, acquire, and/or convert housing project(s) into decent, safe, sanitary, and uncrowded units for low-income, elderly, or handicapped persons, up to 500 units annually for twenty years, with any unused units carried over each year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48542, "no_votes": 15444, "total_votes": 63986, "percent_yes": 75.86347013409184, "percent_no": 24.13652986590816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.136555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.581996", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing local taxes, and only by using existing affordable housing funding, shall public or publicly assisted housing providers within the City of Stockton, according to the City\u2019s General Plan, construct, develop, acquire, and/or convert housing project(s) into decent, safe, sanitary, and uncrowded units for low-income, elderly, or handicapped persons, up to 500 units annually for twenty years, with any unused units carried over each year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3904, "fingerprint": "2018|201800368|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800368|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "dbce44db9433b0ff", "measure_id": "201800368", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To make neighborhoods safer, maintain/improve essential City of Lodi services including: reducing crime; maintaining neighborhood police patrols/gang violence intervention/prevention; fixing potholes/city streets; maintaining neighborhood fire stations; enhancing rapid police/fire response times by restoring firefighter and adding police positions; maintaining recreation facilities/programs; and other general fund purposes; shall the City of Lodi measure enacting an ongoing half cent local sales tax, providing $5,400,000 annually, with independent citizen oversight, and funds spent locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11295, "no_votes": 7947, "total_votes": 19242, "percent_yes": 58.69971936389149, "percent_no": 41.30028063610851, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.135962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.581342", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make neighborhoods safer, maintain/improve essential City of Lodi services including: reducing crime; maintaining neighborhood police patrols/gang violence intervention/prevention; fixing potholes/city streets; maintaining neighborhood fire stations; enhancing rapid police/fire response times by restoring firefighter and adding police positions; maintaining recreation facilities/programs; and other general fund purposes; shall the City of Lodi measure enacting an ongoing half cent local sales tax, providing $5,400,000 annually, with independent citizen oversight, and funds spent locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3908, "fingerprint": "2018|201800372|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800372|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c97244e11f721fb1", "measure_id": "201800372", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted exempting deed-restricted senior housing, attached homes or detached homes on 4,000 square foot or less lots located in areas identified on the attached map from the City\u2019s Growth Management Ordinance, including the implementation section establishing a lottery requirement prior to the sale of homes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5756, "no_votes": 20632, "total_votes": 26388, "percent_yes": 21.81294527815673, "percent_no": 78.18705472184327, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.137099", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.582532", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted exempting deed-restricted senior housing, attached homes or detached homes on 4,000 square foot or less lots located in areas identified on the attached map from the City\u2019s Growth Management Ordinance, including the implementation section establishing a lottery requirement prior to the sale of homes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3913, "fingerprint": "2018|201800082|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800082|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "3f1c76192bd0753a", "measure_id": "201800082", "measure_letter": "A-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Cambria Community Services District Ordinance 01-2018, which imposes an annual special tax of sixty-two dollars and fifteen cents ($62.15) on each parcel of real property in the Cambria Community Services District to fund three (3) full time firefighters, be approved and shall the Cambria Community Services District appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1472, "no_votes": 1272, "total_votes": 2744, "percent_yes": 53.64431486880466, "percent_no": 46.35568513119534, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.138503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.583808", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Cambria Community Services District Ordinance 01-2018, which imposes an annual special tax of sixty-two dollars and fifteen cents ($62.15) on each parcel of real property in the Cambria Community Services District to fund three (3) full time firefighters, be approved and shall the Cambria Community Services District appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3914, "fingerprint": "2018|201800081|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800081|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "25ef1aadd6aa123b", "measure_id": "201800081", "measure_letter": "B-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a Cannabis Business Tax of up to 10% on gross receipts of cannabis businesses operating in unincorporated areas of San Luis Obispo County, estimated to initially raise between 1.4 to 5 million dollars annually, depending on amount of gross receipts, with funds staying local for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including but not limited to public safety, health, environmental protection and addressing industry impacts, unless repealed or amended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62823, "no_votes": 19436, "total_votes": 82259, "percent_yes": 76.37219027705176, "percent_no": 23.627809722948243, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.138826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.584071", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a Cannabis Business Tax of up to 10% on gross receipts of cannabis businesses operating in unincorporated areas of San Luis Obispo County, estimated to initially raise between 1.4 to 5 million dollars annually, depending on amount of gross receipts, with funds staying local for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including but not limited to public safety, health, environmental protection and addressing industry impacts, unless repealed or amended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3924, "fingerprint": "2018|201800381|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800381|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "7d38b334e8ff3040", "measure_id": "201800381", "measure_letter": "D-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, known as the CANNABIS TAX, imposing maximum tax of ten cents per $1 of proceeds of commercial cannabis operations, annual maximum tax of $25 per square foot of commercial cultivation area (CPI adjustments), no sunset clause, estimated $25,000 to $225,000 annual collections on currently allowed operations, revenue available for unrestricted general revenue purposes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3955, "no_votes": 1521, "total_votes": 5476, "percent_yes": 72.22425127830533, "percent_no": 27.77574872169467, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.141622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.586688", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, known as the CANNABIS TAX, imposing maximum tax of ten cents per $1 of proceeds of commercial cannabis operations, annual maximum tax of $25 per square foot of commercial cultivation area (CPI adjustments), no sunset clause, estimated $25,000 to $225,000 annual collections on currently allowed operations, revenue available for unrestricted general revenue purposes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3916, "fingerprint": "2018|201800373|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800373|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "96de93538df57703", "measure_id": "201800373", "measure_letter": "E-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure be adopted to tax cannabis businesses operating illegally or allowed in the future by the voters, State or City, at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 10% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 6% of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses, generating $0-$500,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, such as police, fire and parks, until ended by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9399, "no_votes": 3389, "total_votes": 12788, "percent_yes": 73.4985924304035, "percent_no": 26.501407569596495, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.139409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.584581", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure be adopted to tax cannabis businesses operating illegally or allowed in the future by the voters, State or City, at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 10% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 6% of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses, generating $0-$500,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, such as police, fire and parks, until ended by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3925, "fingerprint": "2018|201800382|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800382|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "ef18495be08d7c77", "measure_id": "201800382", "measure_letter": "F-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to maintain and improve essential City services, including without limitation: police/fire services; senior, youth and park services; programs to retain/attract local jobs; addressing homelessness; and other general revenue purposes; by establishing a cannabis business tax up to 10% of gross receipts for retail and businesses and up to $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation, raising approximately $1,500,000 annually, until ended by voters, with all funds used locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16367, "no_votes": 4091, "total_votes": 20458, "percent_yes": 80.00293283800957, "percent_no": 19.99706716199043, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.141886", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.586933", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to maintain and improve essential City services, including without limitation: police/fire services; senior, youth and park services; programs to retain/attract local jobs; addressing homelessness; and other general revenue purposes; by establishing a cannabis business tax up to 10% of gross receipts for retail and businesses and up to $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation, raising approximately $1,500,000 annually, until ended by voters, with all funds used locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3915, "fingerprint": "2018|201800083|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800083|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "9960c344ecf58f38", "measure_id": "201800083", "measure_letter": "G-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the San Luis Obispo County General Plan and County Code to prohibit any new petroleum extraction and all well stimulation treatments, as defined in the full-text of the measure, including hydraulic fracturing and acid well stimulation, on all lands within the unincorporated area of the county?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57498, "no_votes": 66493, "total_votes": 123991, "percent_yes": 46.37272060068876, "percent_no": 53.62727939931124, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.139142", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.584327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the San Luis Obispo County General Plan and County Code to prohibit any new petroleum extraction and all well stimulation treatments, as defined in the full-text of the measure, including hydraulic fracturing and acid well stimulation, on all lands within the unincorporated area of the county?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3918, "fingerprint": "2018|201800375|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800375|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201800375", "measure_letter": "H-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be Appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5483, "no_votes": 4659, "total_votes": 10142, "percent_yes": 54.06231512522185, "percent_no": 45.93768487477815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.139935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.585106", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be Appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3919, "fingerprint": "2018|201800376|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800376|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "dff742b7bd8a5c13", "measure_id": "201800376", "measure_letter": "I-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve basic city services, such as police and emergency response, parks and youth/senior services, and street repair, shall the City of Paso Robles adopt an ordinance enacting a tax on cannabis-related activities in the amount of up to $20 per square foot for cultivation/processing; up to 10% of gross receipts for transportation; up to 15% of gross receipts for manufacturing, testing, and distribution; and up to 10% of gross receipts for dispensaries, generating approximately $15,000 annually initially for unrestricted general purposes, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7429, "no_votes": 3622, "total_votes": 11051, "percent_yes": 67.22468554881911, "percent_no": 32.77531445118089, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.140198", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.585365", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve basic city services, such as police and emergency response, parks and youth/senior services, and street repair, shall the City of Paso Robles adopt an ordinance enacting a tax on cannabis-related activities in the amount of up to $20 per square foot for cultivation/processing; up to 10% of gross receipts for transportation; up to 15% of gross receipts for manufacturing, testing, and distribution; and up to 10% of gross receipts for dispensaries, generating approximately $15,000 annually initially for unrestricted general purposes, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3917, "fingerprint": "2018|201800374|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800374|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "1a83321e93471d42", "measure_id": "201800374", "measure_letter": "J-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that changes the term of office for the mayor from a two-year term to a four-year term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4403, "no_votes": 8456, "total_votes": 12859, "percent_yes": 34.24060968971149, "percent_no": 65.75939031028851, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.139671", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.584847", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that changes the term of office for the mayor from a two-year term to a four-year term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3920, "fingerprint": "2018|201800377|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800377|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "14af7ca8b544f209", "measure_id": "201800377", "measure_letter": "K-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To upgrade deteriorating streets and sidewalks; and address other general revenue purposes; shall a measure be adopted approving an ordinance establishing a one-half of one percent sales tax providing approximately $4,750,000 annually for 6 years, requiring annual audits, quarterly reports to the public by a citizens oversight committee, and using all funds within Paso Robles only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5200, "no_votes": 5929, "total_votes": 11129, "percent_yes": 46.72477311528439, "percent_no": 53.27522688471561, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.140462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.585631", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade deteriorating streets and sidewalks; and address other general revenue purposes; shall a measure be adopted approving an ordinance establishing a one-half of one percent sales tax providing approximately $4,750,000 annually for 6 years, requiring annual audits, quarterly reports to the public by a citizens oversight committee, and using all funds within Paso Robles only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3922, "fingerprint": "2018|201800379|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800379|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "c8c6b9e19c3b4955", "measure_id": "201800379", "measure_letter": "L-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for maintaining fire and police services, repairing streets, maintaining parks, and other general city services; shall the City of Grover Beach adopt an ordinance amending an ordinance increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax rate charged for hotels and other visitor-serving accommodations from 10% to 12%, providing $70,000 annually in unrestricted funding with all funds staying in Grover Beach?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3746, "no_votes": 1448, "total_votes": 5194, "percent_yes": 72.12167886022334, "percent_no": 27.87832113977666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.141093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.586155", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for maintaining fire and police services, repairing streets, maintaining parks, and other general city services; shall the City of Grover Beach adopt an ordinance amending an ordinance increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax rate charged for hotels and other visitor-serving accommodations from 10% to 12%, providing $70,000 annually in unrestricted funding with all funds staying in Grover Beach?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3923, "fingerprint": "2018|201800380|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800380|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "903ad011e8a96c68", "measure_id": "201800380", "measure_letter": "M-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for maintaining fire and police services, repairing streets, maintaining parks, and other general city services; shall the City of Grover Beach adopt an ordinance amending the annual Business Tax Certificate rate from $55 to a range of $60 to $950 based on building square footage and a separate flat rate of $60 for businesses located outside Grover Beach, providing $90,000 annually in unrestricted funding with all funds staying in Grover Beach?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2923, "no_votes": 1911, "total_votes": 4834, "percent_yes": 60.46752172114192, "percent_no": 39.53247827885808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.141356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.586422", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for maintaining fire and police services, repairing streets, maintaining parks, and other general city services; shall the City of Grover Beach adopt an ordinance amending the annual Business Tax Certificate rate from $55 to a range of $60 to $950 based on building square footage and a separate flat rate of $60 for businesses located outside Grover Beach, providing $90,000 annually in unrestricted funding with all funds staying in Grover Beach?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3921, "fingerprint": "2018|201800378|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800378|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "5161ba4e6b416177", "measure_id": "201800378", "measure_letter": "N-18", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If the voters approve a one-half of one-percent (.5%) limited-term general sales tax increase, shall the additional revenues be used primarily for the purpose of repairing and maintaining the City's streets and sidewalks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7871, "no_votes": 3185, "total_votes": 11056, "percent_yes": 71.19211287988423, "percent_no": 28.807887120115765, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.140781", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.585887", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If the voters approve a one-half of one-percent (.5%) limited-term general sales tax increase, shall the additional revenues be used primarily for the purpose of repairing and maintaining the City's streets and sidewalks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3926, "fingerprint": "2018|201800623|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800623|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "d727d07873621df3", "measure_id": "201800623", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade educational facilities/provide 21st Century technology to affordably prepare local students for jobs/university transfer, update classrooms/labs for career training in public safety, design, computer graphics, theatrical arts; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall this Allan Hancock Joint Community College District measure to issue $75,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates/replace bonds authorized in 2006, levy 1.1 cents/$100 assessed value, $2,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be approved, with oversight, audits, no administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 3, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.142150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.587150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade educational facilities/provide 21st Century technology to affordably prepare local students for jobs/university transfer, update classrooms/labs for career training in public safety, design, computer graphics, theatrical arts; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall this Allan Hancock Joint Community College District measure to issue $75,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates/replace bonds authorized in 2006, levy 1.1 cents/$100 assessed value, $2,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be approved, with oversight, audits, no administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3943, "fingerprint": "2018|201800398|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800398|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "08197bb44ae645fc", "measure_id": "201800398", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to tax any cannabis business operating within the City at annual rates not to exceed $2.00 to $10.00 per square foot for cultivation (inflation adjustable), and 6% of gross receipts for retail, 2.5% for testing, 3% for distribution, and 4% for manufacturing, levied until repealed, estimated to raise at least approximately $64,000 annually from deliveries and potentially more if other businesses are allowed, to fund general City services and expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3324, "no_votes": 2155, "total_votes": 5479, "percent_yes": 60.66800511042161, "percent_no": 39.33199488957839, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.147198", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.590245", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to tax any cannabis business operating within the City at annual rates not to exceed $2.00 to $10.00 per square foot for cultivation (inflation adjustable), and 6% of gross receipts for retail, 2.5% for testing, 3% for distribution, and 4% for manufacturing, levied until repealed, estimated to raise at least approximately $64,000 annually from deliveries and potentially more if other businesses are allowed, to fund general City services and expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3935, "fingerprint": "2018|201800390|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800390|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a07bc44439b57500", "measure_id": "201800390", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain police/fire protection, paramedics, 911 emergency response, address homelessness; clean/repair streets/and public areas; retain and attract jobs/businesses; maintain Daly City financial stability and other general services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City's business license tax by up to 0.05%, with a minimum of $110 per business, providing $420,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits and oversight, with all funds only for Daly City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20178, "no_votes": 4845, "total_votes": 25023, "percent_yes": 80.6378132118451, "percent_no": 19.3621867881549, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.144903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.588787", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain police/fire protection, paramedics, 911 emergency response, address homelessness; clean/repair streets/and public areas; retain and attract jobs/businesses; maintain Daly City financial stability and other general services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City's business license tax by up to 0.05%, with a minimum of $110 per business, providing $420,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits and oversight, with all funds only for Daly City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3930, "fingerprint": "2018|201800385|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800385|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201800385", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5985, "no_votes": 4897, "total_votes": 10882, "percent_yes": 54.999081051277344, "percent_no": 45.000918948722656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.143519", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.587884", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3946, "fingerprint": "2018|201800401|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800401|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "06ed59ca2dd8de20", "measure_id": "201800401", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure funding police patrols, after-school recreation programs and other general city services by imposing a cannabis business tax on all cannabis (marijuana) businesses at an annual rate which shall not exceed 10% of gross receipts of each business, which is expected to generate an estimated $210,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters, requiring annual audits and with all funds staying in Redwood City, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22381, "no_votes": 6060, "total_votes": 28441, "percent_yes": 78.69273232305474, "percent_no": 21.30726767694526, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.148136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.590796", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure funding police patrols, after-school recreation programs and other general city services by imposing a cannabis business tax on all cannabis (marijuana) businesses at an annual rate which shall not exceed 10% of gross receipts of each business, which is expected to generate an estimated $210,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters, requiring annual audits and with all funds staying in Redwood City, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3940, "fingerprint": "2018|201800395|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800395|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ab061643d16c2d47", "measure_id": "201800395", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City draft and adopt an ordinance to allow and regulate commercial, greenhouse cultivation of mature cannabis plants on existing greenhouse sites in the City's A-1 (Agricultural/Exclusive Floriculture) Zoning District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2418, "no_votes": 3130, "total_votes": 5548, "percent_yes": 43.5832732516222, "percent_no": 56.4167267483778, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.146368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.589695", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City draft and adopt an ordinance to allow and regulate commercial, greenhouse cultivation of mature cannabis plants on existing greenhouse sites in the City's A-1 (Agricultural/Exclusive Floriculture) Zoning District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3951, "fingerprint": "2018|201800406|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800406|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "094806c405a07166", "measure_id": "201800406", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain the quality of life in South San Francisco by providing services and improvements to accommodate visitors and residents, enhance public safety, community development, parks and recreation programs, street repair and traffic circulation, and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the ongoing tax on hotel guests from 10% to 12% with a 1% increase each subsequent year up to a maximum rate of 14%, providing approximately an additional $5,920,000 annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14763, "no_votes": 5018, "total_votes": 19781, "percent_yes": 74.63222284009909, "percent_no": 25.36777715990091, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.149537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.591693", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of life in South San Francisco by providing services and improvements to accommodate visitors and residents, enhance public safety, community development, parks and recreation programs, street repair and traffic circulation, and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the ongoing tax on hotel guests from 10% to 12% with a 1% increase each subsequent year up to a maximum rate of 14%, providing approximately an additional $5,920,000 annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3944, "fingerprint": "2018|201800399|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800399|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e151acb34142350e", "measure_id": "201800399", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure, an ordinance to allow and regulate commercial, greenhouse nursery cultivation of immature cannabis plants on existing greenhouse sites in the City's A-1 (Agricultural/Exclusive Floriculture) Zoning District for cannabis nurseries that receive a license from the City Council and comply with specified standards, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2983, "no_votes": 2650, "total_votes": 5633, "percent_yes": 52.95579620095864, "percent_no": 47.04420379904136, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.147533", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.590431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, an ordinance to allow and regulate commercial, greenhouse nursery cultivation of immature cannabis plants on existing greenhouse sites in the City's A-1 (Agricultural/Exclusive Floriculture) Zoning District for cannabis nurseries that receive a license from the City Council and comply with specified standards, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3938, "fingerprint": "2018|201800393|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800393|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "3085f45522b6990b", "measure_id": "201800393", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to impose a parcel tax on commercial office space over 25,000 square feet at an annual rate of $2.50 per square foot, estimated to annually raise $1,675,000, for affordable and supportive housing programs; programs that facilitate access to job opportunities in the S.T.E.M. sectors, building trades and strengthen First Source Hiring; and for City to administer the ordinance and provide annual reports, which shall continue until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4366, "no_votes": 1120, "total_votes": 5486, "percent_yes": 79.58439664600802, "percent_no": 20.415603353991983, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.145773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.589324", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to impose a parcel tax on commercial office space over 25,000 square feet at an annual rate of $2.50 per square foot, estimated to annually raise $1,675,000, for affordable and supportive housing programs; programs that facilitate access to job opportunities in the S.T.E.M. sectors, building trades and strengthen First Source Hiring; and for City to administer the ordinance and provide annual reports, which shall continue until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3945, "fingerprint": "2018|201800400|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800400|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fcd5ae799bad76b4", "measure_id": "201800400", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure to provide a modern recreation center: Meeting current earthquake, electrical, fire safety codes; Providing emergency shelter, disabled access; Restoring space for youth, senior, family fitness/arts/education programs/ classes; by issuing $12 million in bonds, levying $8.70 per $100,000 assessed valuation, raising approximately $750,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring citizens oversight, independent audits, all funds spent for the purpose of restoring the recreating center, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5393, "no_votes": 3274, "total_votes": 8667, "percent_yes": 62.22452982577593, "percent_no": 37.77547017422407, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.147870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.590615", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure to provide a modern recreation center: Meeting current earthquake, electrical, fire safety codes; Providing emergency shelter, disabled access; Restoring space for youth, senior, family fitness/arts/education programs/ classes; by issuing $12 million in bonds, levying $8.70 per $100,000 assessed valuation, raising approximately $750,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring citizens oversight, independent audits, all funds spent for the purpose of restoring the recreating center, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3956, "fingerprint": "2018|201800627|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800627|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d7986b1ac42d0395", "measure_id": "201800627", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build affordable rental housing so teachers and school staff can live in the communities where they work, shall Jefferson Union High School District (including Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor and Adult- Ed High Schools) issue $33 million of bonds with an average tax levy of 0.7 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds are outstanding ($2.3 million per year), legal rates, annual audits and independent taxpayer oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14492, "no_votes": 11483, "total_votes": 25975, "percent_yes": 55.79210779595765, "percent_no": 44.20789220404235, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.152305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.592631", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build affordable rental housing so teachers and school staff can live in the communities where they work, shall Jefferson Union High School District (including Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor and Adult- Ed High Schools) issue $33 million of bonds with an average tax levy of 0.7 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds are outstanding ($2.3 million per year), legal rates, annual audits and independent taxpayer oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3933, "fingerprint": "2018|201800388|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800388|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7b7c2a4b7ed70c36", "measure_id": "201800388", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Brisbane's General Plan be amended to permit within the Baylands a range of 1800 to 2200 residences north of an extension of Main Street, and up to 7 million square feet of new commercial development, subject to these restrictions to protect Brisbane: land for housing must be certified safe for ground-level residential use; landfill must be permanently, safely capped; and development must abide by Brisbane's Sustainability Framework principles and produce net positive City revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1158, "no_votes": 940, "total_votes": 2098, "percent_yes": 55.195424213536704, "percent_no": 44.804575786463296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.144371", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.588424", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Brisbane's General Plan be amended to permit within the Baylands a range of 1800 to 2200 residences north of an extension of Main Street, and up to 7 million square feet of new commercial development, subject to these restrictions to protect Brisbane: land for housing must be certified safe for ground-level residential use; landfill must be permanently, safely capped; and development must abide by Brisbane's Sustainability Framework principles and produce net positive City revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3953, "fingerprint": "2018|201800624|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800624|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d65474f339c5d575", "measure_id": "201800624", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve academic excellence, maintain math, science, technology, reading, writing, art/ music programs, attract/retain qualified teachers, and keep school libraries open, shall this Belmont-Redwood Shores School District measure to levy $118 per parcel for five years, raise $1,400,000 annually for schools that cannot be taken by the State be adopted, with independent community oversight of expenditures, no funds for administrator salaries, an exemption for senior citizens, and all funds staying in local schools to protect student education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7949, "no_votes": 3791, "total_votes": 11740, "percent_yes": 67.70868824531516, "percent_no": 32.29131175468484, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.150817", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.592052", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve academic excellence, maintain math, science, technology, reading, writing, art/ music programs, attract/retain qualified teachers, and keep school libraries open, shall this Belmont-Redwood Shores School District measure to levy $118 per parcel for five years, raise $1,400,000 annually for schools that cannot be taken by the State be adopted, with independent community oversight of expenditures, no funds for administrator salaries, an exemption for senior citizens, and all funds staying in local schools to protect student education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3931, "fingerprint": "2018|201800386|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800386|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0baab4ef22cb9d36", "measure_id": "201800386", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a City of Belmont ordinance providing funding, that cannot be taken by the State, for city services including: Fixing potholes, repairing streets and sidewalks; Maintaining neighborhood police patrols and crime prevention; Maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response times; Maintaining parks, open spaces, sports fields; Unrestricted general revenue purposes; by permanently raising the transient occupancy tax to 12% of the rent paid by guests, providing an additional $560,000 annually, with independent audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8695, "no_votes": 2829, "total_votes": 11524, "percent_yes": 75.45123221103783, "percent_no": 24.548767788962166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.143844", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.588063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a City of Belmont ordinance providing funding, that cannot be taken by the State, for city services including: Fixing potholes, repairing streets and sidewalks; Maintaining neighborhood police patrols and crime prevention; Maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response times; Maintaining parks, open spaces, sports fields; Unrestricted general revenue purposes; by permanently raising the transient occupancy tax to 12% of the rent paid by guests, providing an additional $560,000 annually, with independent audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3954, "fingerprint": "2018|201800625|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800625|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fe87f2d842fdb4f5", "measure_id": "201800625", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support academic excellence with funding the State cannot take away; fund school libraries; improve educational programs; hire/retain qualified teachers and staff; and improve student access to modern technology, shall Brisbane School District reauthorize the existing local school parcel tax, at the rate of $166 per year, for eight years, exempting senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, an estimated amount of $591,460 raised annually and all funds spent to support local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1598, "no_votes": 595, "total_votes": 2193, "percent_yes": 72.86821705426357, "percent_no": 27.131782945736433, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.151248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.592232", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support academic excellence with funding the State cannot take away; fund school libraries; improve educational programs; hire/retain qualified teachers and staff; and improve student access to modern technology, shall Brisbane School District reauthorize the existing local school parcel tax, at the rate of $166 per year, for eight years, exempting senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, an estimated amount of $591,460 raised annually and all funds spent to support local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3952, "fingerprint": "2018|201800407|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800407|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4fa95f0dc67185d7", "measure_id": "201800407", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain the quality of life in South San Francisco by providing public safety services to address the impact of commercial cannabis operations permitted within the City and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted establishing an ongoing business license tax on all cannabis businesses of no more than 5% of gross receipts to vary by each type of permitted business, providing approximately $100,000 to $700,000 or more in revenues annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14767, "no_votes": 4806, "total_votes": 19573, "percent_yes": 75.44576712818679, "percent_no": 24.554232871813213, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.150368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.591873", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of life in South San Francisco by providing public safety services to address the impact of commercial cannabis operations permitted within the City and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted establishing an ongoing business license tax on all cannabis businesses of no more than 5% of gross receipts to vary by each type of permitted business, providing approximately $100,000 to $700,000 or more in revenues annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3955, "fingerprint": "2018|201800626|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800626|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a51b1d2dde75d079", "measure_id": "201800626", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update classrooms and science labs in schools; perform essential safety repairs; fix leaky roofs; equip classrooms with 21st-century learning technology; replace aging heating/plumbing; and construct/equip classrooms, shall Cabrillo Unified School District issue $99,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, raising amounts needed each year to repay bonds while outstanding, at an estimated rate of $52 per $100,000 of assessed value, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4864, "no_votes": 3969, "total_votes": 8833, "percent_yes": 55.066228914298655, "percent_no": 44.933771085701345, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.151684", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.592448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update classrooms and science labs in schools; perform essential safety repairs; fix leaky roofs; equip classrooms with 21st-century learning technology; replace aging heating/plumbing; and construct/equip classrooms, shall Cabrillo Unified School District issue $99,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, raising amounts needed each year to repay bonds while outstanding, at an estimated rate of $52 per $100,000 of assessed value, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3941, "fingerprint": "2018|201800396|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800396|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6fdcc34ec34fe8b1", "measure_id": "201800396", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City draft and adopt an ordinance to allow and regulate commercial manufacturing of cannabis products on sites in the City's IND (Industrial) Zoning District and/or on existing greenhouse sites in the City's A-1 (Agricultural/Exclusive Floriculture) Zoning District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2240, "no_votes": 3290, "total_votes": 5530, "percent_yes": 40.50632911392405, "percent_no": 59.49367088607595, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.146671", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.589880", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City draft and adopt an ordinance to allow and regulate commercial manufacturing of cannabis products on sites in the City's IND (Industrial) Zoning District and/or on existing greenhouse sites in the City's A-1 (Agricultural/Exclusive Floriculture) Zoning District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3958, "fingerprint": "2018|201800629|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800629|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a94c0145e220bcc6", "measure_id": "201800629", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support students with funds that cannot be taken by the State, to: maintain 21st century, hands-on science labs, technology, engineering/ math instruction; strengthen reading/ writing programs; attract/ retain qualified teachers; and restore art/ music programs; shall Millbrae Elementary School District levy $97 per parcel, raising $700,000 annually for 5 years, exempting seniors, providing funds for classroom instruction, not administrators' salaries, requiring independent citizen oversight and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4842, "no_votes": 1641, "total_votes": 6483, "percent_yes": 74.68764460897732, "percent_no": 25.312355391022678, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.153783", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.592991", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support students with funds that cannot be taken by the State, to: maintain 21st century, hands-on science labs, technology, engineering/ math instruction; strengthen reading/ writing programs; attract/ retain qualified teachers; and restore art/ music programs; shall Millbrae Elementary School District levy $97 per parcel, raising $700,000 annually for 5 years, exempting seniors, providing funds for classroom instruction, not administrators' salaries, requiring independent citizen oversight and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3949, "fingerprint": "2018|201800404|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800404|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "1f87dfb97c11a307", "measure_id": "201800404", "measure_letter": "NN", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect the quality of life in San Carlos by providing services and improvements needed to accommodate residents, enhance public safety, community development, parks and recreation programs, street repair and traffic circulation, and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted establishing an ongoing excise tax on any cannabis business that opens, up to 10% of gross receipts of each business, estimated to provide approximately $200,000 annually per cannabis business?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11775, "no_votes": 3292, "total_votes": 15067, "percent_yes": 78.15092586447201, "percent_no": 21.849074135527985, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.149002", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.591334", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of life in San Carlos by providing services and improvements needed to accommodate residents, enhance public safety, community development, parks and recreation programs, street repair and traffic circulation, and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted establishing an ongoing excise tax on any cannabis business that opens, up to 10% of gross receipts of each business, estimated to provide approximately $200,000 annually per cannabis business?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3959, "fingerprint": "2018|201800630|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800630|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "54d6efa12837f3da", "measure_id": "201800630", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and improve local elementary schools including, student safety/campus security, fixing aging/leaking roofs; upgrading classrooms, labs/computer systems to support programs in science/math, technology, English, arts; and & acquiring and constructing school facilities, shall Pacifica School District issue $55,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an estimated $3,450,000 annually for approximately 33 years at 8 projected rates of three cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens' oversight and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6925, "no_votes": 4138, "total_votes": 11063, "percent_yes": 62.59604085691042, "percent_no": 37.40395914308958, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.154058", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.593171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and improve local elementary schools including, student safety/campus security, fixing aging/leaking roofs; upgrading classrooms, labs/computer systems to support programs in science/math, technology, English, arts; and & acquiring and constructing school facilities, shall Pacifica School District issue $55,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an estimated $3,450,000 annually for approximately 33 years at 8 projected rates of three cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens' oversight and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3947, "fingerprint": "2018|201800402|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800402|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fe96bfc4640d44fe", "measure_id": "201800402", "measure_letter": "OO", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure amending the Charter to update certain provisions, including modernizing public notice provisions, establishing terms limits for City boards, requiring the budget to be submitted to Council 30 days before the new fiscal year, having the City Clerk appointed by the City Manager, eliminating a residency requirement for City Manager to comply with State law, updating procedures for City payments, and consolidating the roles of Director of Finance and Treasurer, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20606, "no_votes": 5968, "total_votes": 26574, "percent_yes": 77.54195830511026, "percent_no": 22.458041694889744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.148463", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.590975", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure amending the Charter to update certain provisions, including modernizing public notice provisions, establishing terms limits for City boards, requiring the budget to be submitted to Council 30 days before the new fiscal year, having the City Clerk appointed by the City Manager, eliminating a residency requirement for City Manager to comply with State law, updating procedures for City payments, and consolidating the roles of Director of Finance and Treasurer, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3928, "fingerprint": "2018|201800383|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800383|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fe68d361c22b7ac5", "measure_id": "201800383", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve the levee protecting essential city services, including fire, police, water, sewer, transportation infrastructure; protect Foster City homes, schools, businesses from flooding; avoid both Foster City being designated a FEMA special flood hazard area and flood insurance requirements for residents/businesses; shall Foster City issue $90,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy approximately $40 per $100,000 assessed valuation, averaging $5,171,000 collected annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens' oversight, no funds for administrators, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6275, "no_votes": 1506, "total_votes": 7781, "percent_yes": 80.64516129032258, "percent_no": 19.354838709677423, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.142985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.587518", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the levee protecting essential city services, including fire, police, water, sewer, transportation infrastructure; protect Foster City homes, schools, businesses from flooding; avoid both Foster City being designated a FEMA special flood hazard area and flood insurance requirements for residents/businesses; shall Foster City issue $90,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy approximately $40 per $100,000 assessed valuation, averaging $5,171,000 collected annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens' oversight, no funds for administrators, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3934, "fingerprint": "2018|201800389|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800389|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6bb0673a0fcf95de", "measure_id": "201800389", "measure_letter": "PP", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve general Town services, such as police service levels, street operations and maintenance, as well as parks, community buildings and infrastructure; shall the Town of Colma adopt an ordinance establishing a 12% Transient Occupancy (\"Hotel\") Tax generating approximately $319,000 annually until ended by voters, if a hotel is developed, requiring annual audits and no tax rate increase without voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 337, "no_votes": 100, "total_votes": 437, "percent_yes": 77.11670480549199, "percent_no": 22.88329519450801, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.144638", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.588606", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve general Town services, such as police service levels, street operations and maintenance, as well as parks, community buildings and infrastructure; shall the Town of Colma adopt an ordinance establishing a 12% Transient Occupancy (\"Hotel\") Tax generating approximately $319,000 annually until ended by voters, if a hotel is developed, requiring annual audits and no tax rate increase without voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3960, "fingerprint": "2018|201800631|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800631|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0db3cca497050ffb", "measure_id": "201800631", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local elementary and middle school students' learning and achievement in reading, writing, math and other educational programs; invest in classroom computers and technology; increase safety; maintain reduced class sizes; and attract and retain highly qualified staff; shall the Ravenswood City School District renew an existing tax of $196 per parcel for 8 years, providing $1.2 million annually, with small annual adjustments, senior and legal exemptions, all money staying local and requiring citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2129, "no_votes": 730, "total_votes": 2859, "percent_yes": 74.46659671213712, "percent_no": 25.533403287862882, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.154327", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.593352", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local elementary and middle school students' learning and achievement in reading, writing, math and other educational programs; invest in classroom computers and technology; increase safety; maintain reduced class sizes; and attract and retain highly qualified staff; shall the Ravenswood City School District renew an existing tax of $196 per parcel for 8 years, providing $1.2 million annually, with small annual adjustments, senior and legal exemptions, all money staying local and requiring citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3950, "fingerprint": "2018|201800405|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800405|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b99c7694900b502c", "measure_id": "201800405", "measure_letter": "QQ", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain the quality of life in San Carlos by providing services and improvements to accommodate visitors and residents, enhance public safety, community development, parks and recreation programs, street repair and traffic circulation, and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the ongoing tax on hotel guests from 10% to 12% with a 0.5% increase per year for subsequent years up to a maximum rate of 14% adding approximately $1,650,000 annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11824, "no_votes": 3273, "total_votes": 15097, "percent_yes": 78.32019606544347, "percent_no": 21.67980393455653, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.149267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.591515", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of life in San Carlos by providing services and improvements to accommodate visitors and residents, enhance public safety, community development, parks and recreation programs, street repair and traffic circulation, and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the ongoing tax on hotel guests from 10% to 12% with a 0.5% increase per year for subsequent years up to a maximum rate of 14% adding approximately $1,650,000 annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3957, "fingerprint": "2018|201800628|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800628|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9aed7e3565ad6ea5", "measure_id": "201800628", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/improve aging schools to protect quality academic instruction in math, science/ reading with funding that cannot be taken by the State, upgrade leaking roofs, outdated fire alarms, electrical/heating, classrooms/facilities, meet health, safety/seismic codes, acquire, repair, construct, equipment, sites/facilities, shall this Las Lomitas Elementary School District measure be adopted to issue $70,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($4,900,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2683, "no_votes": 1267, "total_votes": 3950, "percent_yes": 67.92405063291139, "percent_no": 32.07594936708861, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.153207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.592811", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/improve aging schools to protect quality academic instruction in math, science/ reading with funding that cannot be taken by the State, upgrade leaking roofs, outdated fire alarms, electrical/heating, classrooms/facilities, meet health, safety/seismic codes, acquire, repair, construct, equipment, sites/facilities, shall this Las Lomitas Elementary School District measure be adopted to issue $70,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($4,900,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3927, "fingerprint": "2018|201800084|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800084|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "effc61d4366a2521", "measure_id": "201800084", "measure_letter": "RM3", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89524, "no_votes": 73533, "total_votes": 163057, "percent_yes": 54.903500003066405, "percent_no": 45.096499996933595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.142619", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.587336", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3948, "fingerprint": "2018|201800403|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800403|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "81bb486f27526f81", "measure_id": "201800403", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to fund essential city services such as protecting rapid 911 emergency response times; preventing the number of on-duty firefighters/paramedics/police officers; continuing after-school/recreation programs for children; and maintaining local library hours/programs by establishing a 0.5% sales tax, providing approximately $8,000,000 annually until repealed by voters, with exemptions for essential purchases like food/medicine, annual audits and all funds staying in Redwood City, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19207, "no_votes": 9210, "total_votes": 28417, "percent_yes": 67.58982299327867, "percent_no": 32.41017700672133, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.148737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.591154", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to fund essential city services such as protecting rapid 911 emergency response times; preventing the number of on-duty firefighters/paramedics/police officers; continuing after-school/recreation programs for children; and maintaining local library hours/programs by establishing a 0.5% sales tax, providing approximately $8,000,000 annually until repealed by voters, with exemptions for essential purchases like food/medicine, annual audits and all funds staying in Redwood City, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3961, "fingerprint": "2018|201800632|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800632|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "87657c1d697b5f54", "measure_id": "201800632", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue improving classrooms and facilities; repair more aging buildings; and further upgrade safety, technology, science labs, and energy efficiency; shall the Ravenswood City School District issue $70 million in bonds, at legal rates, averaging an estimated $3.95 million in taxes raised annually for approximately 32 years at projected tax rates of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, and requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds used for Ravenswood schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1992, "no_votes": 861, "total_votes": 2853, "percent_yes": 69.82124079915877, "percent_no": 30.178759200841228, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.154597", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.593532", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue improving classrooms and facilities; repair more aging buildings; and further upgrade safety, technology, science labs, and energy efficiency; shall the Ravenswood City School District issue $70 million in bonds, at legal rates, averaging an estimated $3.95 million in taxes raised annually for approximately 32 years at projected tax rates of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, and requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds used for Ravenswood schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3942, "fingerprint": "2018|201800397|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800397|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0a39a069878f523c", "measure_id": "201800397", "measure_letter": "SS", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City draft and adopt an ordinance to allow and regulate retail sales of cannabis and cannabis products at up to two locations within the city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2423, "no_votes": 3126, "total_votes": 5549, "percent_yes": 43.66552531987746, "percent_no": 56.33447468012254, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.146936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.590063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City draft and adopt an ordinance to allow and regulate retail sales of cannabis and cannabis products at up to two locations within the city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3929, "fingerprint": "2018|201800384|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800384|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "563415b339131553", "measure_id": "201800384", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to amend Chapter 3.32 of the Portola Valley Municipal Code to reduce the general purpose Utility Users Tax levied on telephone, gas, water and electricity, from 5.5 percent to 4.5 percent, for a period of five years with authority given to the Town Council to further reduce the tax rate by resolution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1541, "no_votes": 279, "total_votes": 1820, "percent_yes": 84.67032967032966, "percent_no": 15.329670329670336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.143252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.587700", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to amend Chapter 3.32 of the Portola Valley Municipal Code to reduce the general purpose Utility Users Tax levied on telephone, gas, water and electricity, from 5.5 percent to 4.5 percent, for a period of five years with authority given to the Town Council to further reduce the tax rate by resolution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3939, "fingerprint": "2018|201800394|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800394|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "032c7ea09604efa0", "measure_id": "201800394", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for vital city services such as police, fire, parks, and infrastructure maintenance, and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall the City of Foster City adopt an ordinance increasing the transient occupancy tax by hotel guests from the current 9.5% to 11% effective January 1, 2019 through June 30, 2019, increasing to 12% July 1, 2019, providing between approximately $924,000 and $981,000 annually, until repealed or amended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8601, "no_votes": 2941, "total_votes": 11542, "percent_yes": 74.51914746144516, "percent_no": 25.480852538554842, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.146042", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.589506", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for vital city services such as police, fire, parks, and infrastructure maintenance, and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, shall the City of Foster City adopt an ordinance increasing the transient occupancy tax by hotel guests from the current 9.5% to 11% effective January 1, 2019 through June 30, 2019, increasing to 12% July 1, 2019, providing between approximately $924,000 and $981,000 annually, until repealed or amended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3962, "fingerprint": "2018|201800633|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800633|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "02d5790e127a68cc", "measure_id": "201800633", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety/campus security systems/fencing, attract/retain qualified staff, repair/upgrade aging classrooms/facilities, shall Jefferson Elementary School District's measure authorizing $30,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.5 cents/$100 assessed value, $2,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, acquiring, constructing/repairing classrooms, facilities/equipment, affordable rental housing for teachers/staff, roofs, plumbing/ electrical systems, be adopted, with Oversight, all funds benefiting local schools, not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14257, "no_votes": 6730, "total_votes": 20987, "percent_yes": 67.93252966121885, "percent_no": 32.06747033878115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.154940", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.593717", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety/campus security systems/fencing, attract/retain qualified staff, repair/upgrade aging classrooms/facilities, shall Jefferson Elementary School District's measure authorizing $30,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.5 cents/$100 assessed value, $2,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, acquiring, constructing/repairing classrooms, facilities/equipment, affordable rental housing for teachers/staff, roofs, plumbing/ electrical systems, be adopted, with Oversight, all funds benefiting local schools, not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3936, "fingerprint": "2018|201800391|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800391|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4e3b0bc3457bb081", "measure_id": "201800391", "measure_letter": "UU", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City to establish up to a 10% tax on the gross receipts of all cannabis/marijuana businesses in Daly City if any cannabis/marijuana businesses are allowed in the city in the future, providing approximately $450,000 annually for general public services until ended by voters, requiring audits and oversight, with all funds only for Daly City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19723, "no_votes": 5525, "total_votes": 25248, "percent_yes": 78.11707858048163, "percent_no": 21.882921419518368, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.145225", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.588966", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City to establish up to a 10% tax on the gross receipts of all cannabis/marijuana businesses in Daly City if any cannabis/marijuana businesses are allowed in the city in the future, providing approximately $450,000 annually for general public services until ended by voters, requiring audits and oversight, with all funds only for Daly City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11214, "fingerprint": "2018|201800637|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800637|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a24a51995e1b2079", "measure_id": "201800637", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide necessary funding that cannot be taken by the State, attract/retain excellent teachers, enhance math, science, technology, reading/writing programs, support art/drama/music, shall San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District's measure levying a nine year $298, as adjusted, per parcel education tax, raising $10 million annually, exemptions for seniors, no funds for administrators' salaries/independent citizen oversight ensuring accountability and that funds are spent as promised in Foster City/San Mateo classrooms be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33875, "no_votes": 16030, "total_votes": 49905, "percent_yes": 67.87897004308185, "percent_no": 32.12102995691815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.611900", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.156010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.594438", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide necessary funding that cannot be taken by the State, attract/retain excellent teachers, enhance math, science, technology, reading/writing programs, support art/drama/music, shall San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District's measure levying a nine year $298, as adjusted, per parcel education tax, raising $10 million annually, exemptions for seniors, no funds for administrators' salaries/independent citizen oversight ensuring accountability and that funds are spent as promised in Foster City/San Mateo classrooms be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3937, "fingerprint": "2018|201800392|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800392|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fff72ccaa027d991", "measure_id": "201800392", "measure_letter": "V V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain senior, youth/afterschool, parks/recreation, library, disaster preparedness programs, school safety officers, rapid response to burglaries; address homelessness; improve traffic safety; maintain Daly City financial stability and other general services, shall an ordinance by adopted increasing the City's transient occupancy (hotel) tax by up to 3% paid by hotel/motel guests, providing approximately $300,000 annually until ended by votes, requiring audits, with all funds only for Daly City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20024, "no_votes": 5076, "total_votes": 25100, "percent_yes": 79.77689243027889, "percent_no": 20.22310756972111, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.145505", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.589145", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain senior, youth/afterschool, parks/recreation, library, disaster preparedness programs, school safety officers, rapid response to burglaries; address homelessness; improve traffic safety; maintain Daly City financial stability and other general services, shall an ordinance by adopted increasing the City's transient occupancy (hotel) tax by up to 3% paid by hotel/motel guests, providing approximately $300,000 annually until ended by votes, requiring audits, with all funds only for Daly City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3932, "fingerprint": "2018|201800387|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800387|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201800387", "measure_letter": "WW", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5588, "no_votes": 5235, "total_votes": 10823, "percent_yes": 51.63078628845976, "percent_no": 48.36921371154024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.144107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.588244", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3965, "fingerprint": "2018|201800636|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800636|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6cc083b6c8f95055", "measure_id": "201800636", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, technology, and school facilities to support student achievement and college readiness, improve student and school safety/security and repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, shall San Bruno Park School District issue $79 million at legal interest rates, levying 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, raising an average $4 million annually to improve/repair our aging schools, with citizen oversight with all money benefitting our local community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9453, "no_votes": 4108, "total_votes": 13561, "percent_yes": 69.70724872796991, "percent_no": 30.292751272030088, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.155742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.594257", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, technology, and school facilities to support student achievement and college readiness, improve student and school safety/security and repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, shall San Bruno Park School District issue $79 million at legal interest rates, levying 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, raising an average $4 million annually to improve/repair our aging schools, with citizen oversight with all money benefitting our local community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3963, "fingerprint": "2018|201800634|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800634|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "53286b6728e2af64", "measure_id": "201800634", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve school safety, protect vital educational programs and attract and retain highly qualified teachers and staff, shall Jefferson Union High School District (including Jefferson, Oceana, Shasta, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor, and Adult-Ed High Schools) levy $58 per parcel for 10 years (raising $2.0 million annually) with an exemption for senior citizens, independent taxpayer oversight, annual audits, and no funds used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28750, "no_votes": 14001, "total_votes": 42751, "percent_yes": 67.24988889148791, "percent_no": 32.75011110851209, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.155208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.593897", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve school safety, protect vital educational programs and attract and retain highly qualified teachers and staff, shall Jefferson Union High School District (including Jefferson, Oceana, Shasta, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor, and Adult-Ed High Schools) levy $58 per parcel for 10 years (raising $2.0 million annually) with an exemption for senior citizens, independent taxpayer oversight, annual audits, and no funds used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3964, "fingerprint": "2018|201800635|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800635|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8227b735a17fb6ec", "measure_id": "201800635", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace leaking roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, repair/replace classrooms for math, science, reading, writing/technology instruction, upgrade outdated safety systems to meet current safety codes, qualify for State matching funds, and acquire equipment/construct facilities, shall this Portola Valley School District measure authorizing $49,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $3.4 million annually at $30/$100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, be adopted with oversight, all funds benefiting Portola Valley schools, and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2578, "no_votes": 1554, "total_votes": 4132, "percent_yes": 62.39109390125847, "percent_no": 37.60890609874153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.155474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.594077", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace leaking roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, repair/replace classrooms for math, science, reading, writing/technology instruction, upgrade outdated safety systems to meet current safety codes, qualify for State matching funds, and acquire equipment/construct facilities, shall this Portola Valley School District measure authorizing $49,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $3.4 million annually at $30/$100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, be adopted with oversight, all funds benefiting Portola Valley schools, and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3981, "fingerprint": "2018|201800641|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800641|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "c76434e451dc9be9", "measure_id": "201800641", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; bring back the music program; enhance academic programs in science, technology, engineering, math and arts; increase student access to computers and technology; and maintain small class sizes; shall Buellton Union School District be authorized to levy $99 per parcel annually for eight years raising approximately $250,000 / year, provide a senior citizens' exemption, have an independent citizens' oversight committee, with no funds for administrators' salaries, and require all funds to be spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1592, "no_votes": 1028, "total_votes": 2620, "percent_yes": 60.76335877862596, "percent_no": 39.23664122137404, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.160555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.598577", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; bring back the music program; enhance academic programs in science, technology, engineering, math and arts; increase student access to computers and technology; and maintain small class sizes; shall Buellton Union School District be authorized to levy $99 per parcel annually for eight years raising approximately $250,000 / year, provide a senior citizens' exemption, have an independent citizens' oversight committee, with no funds for administrators' salaries, and require all funds to be spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3974, "fingerprint": "2018|201800413|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800413|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "8f17ef5df54eefab", "measure_id": "201800413", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require City general elections to be held in even-numbered years instead of odd-numbered years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23227, "no_votes": 9588, "total_votes": 32815, "percent_yes": 70.78165473106812, "percent_no": 29.218345268931884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.158607", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.596790", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require City general elections to be held in even-numbered years instead of odd-numbered years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3975, "fingerprint": "2018|201800414|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800414|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "1ebeb7cd0a4d7a5d", "measure_id": "201800414", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to reflect the City\u2019s court-ordered switch to district elections, with six Council districts and the Mayor elected citywide, and including new special election requirements for Council and Mayoral vacancies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23775, "no_votes": 7657, "total_votes": 31432, "percent_yes": 75.6394756935607, "percent_no": 24.360524306439302, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.158876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.597040", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to reflect the City\u2019s court-ordered switch to district elections, with six Council districts and the Mayor elected citywide, and including new special election requirements for Council and Mayoral vacancies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3973, "fingerprint": "2018|201800412|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800412|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d513c2d99fdf63a9", "measure_id": "201800412", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure imposing a CANNABIS TAX of six cents per $1.00 of non-medical retail sales proceeds, one cent per $1.00 of cultivation proceeds, flat $15,000 for net income less than $2 Million and $30,000 for net income of $2 Million and more of manufacturing/distribution proceeds, a total aggregate tax of six cents per $1.00 of microbusinesses proceeds, no tax on testing, with no sunset clause, estimated to collect $130,000 to $470,000, annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7884, "no_votes": 2584, "total_votes": 10468, "percent_yes": 75.31524646541841, "percent_no": 24.68475353458159, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.158342", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.596532", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure imposing a CANNABIS TAX of six cents per $1.00 of non-medical retail sales proceeds, one cent per $1.00 of cultivation proceeds, flat $15,000 for net income less than $2 Million and $30,000 for net income of $2 Million and more of manufacturing/distribution proceeds, a total aggregate tax of six cents per $1.00 of microbusinesses proceeds, no tax on testing, with no sunset clause, estimated to collect $130,000 to $470,000, annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3982, "fingerprint": "2018|201800642|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800642|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "545dfd32637e7de8", "measure_id": "201800642", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms/schools; replace outdated air-conditioning systems; upgrade P.E. fields/facilities for school and community use; shall Lompoc Unified School District issue $79,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $5,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of approximately $.06 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries, all money staying local, without increasing tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8417, "no_votes": 7498, "total_votes": 15915, "percent_yes": 52.88721332076657, "percent_no": 47.11278667923343, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.160890", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.598835", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms/schools; replace outdated air-conditioning systems; upgrade P.E. fields/facilities for school and community use; shall Lompoc Unified School District issue $79,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $5,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of approximately $.06 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries, all money staying local, without increasing tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3977, "fingerprint": "2018|201800416|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800416|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "660851bb2e317cfb", "measure_id": "201800416", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a cannabis business tax on gross receipts of yes cannabis businesses from the sale of cannabis and cannabis products, at a rate not to exceed 10%, with initial rate of 5% and a maximum annual increase of 1% up to the maximum rate, to fund general municipal services such as street repair, parks, and law enforcement, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2193, "no_votes": 520, "total_votes": 2713, "percent_yes": 80.83302617029119, "percent_no": 19.16697382970881, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.159404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.597557", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a cannabis business tax on gross receipts of yes cannabis businesses from the sale of cannabis and cannabis products, at a rate not to exceed 10%, with initial rate of 5% and a maximum annual increase of 1% up to the maximum rate, to fund general municipal services such as street repair, parks, and law enforcement, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3968, "fingerprint": "2018|201800087|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800087|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "e6856fa259d385c3", "measure_id": "201800087", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance of the Board of Supervisors to create an eleven-member independent redistricting commission to adjust the boundaries of the County supervisorial districts by adding Section 2-10.9A to the Santa Barbara County Code be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73331, "no_votes": 63532, "total_votes": 136863, "percent_yes": 53.57985722949227, "percent_no": 46.42014277050773, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.156951", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.594983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance of the Board of Supervisors to create an eleven-member independent redistricting commission to adjust the boundaries of the County supervisorial districts by adding Section 2-10.9A to the Santa Barbara County Code be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3967, "fingerprint": "2018|201800086|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800086|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "94cda1cd039dfc69", "measure_id": "201800086", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure adding Section 2-10.91 to the Santa Barbara County Code to create an Independent Redistricting Commission to adjust the boundaries of the supervisorial districts be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43903, "no_votes": 88901, "total_votes": 132804, "percent_yes": 33.05849221408993, "percent_no": 66.94150778591006, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.156618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.594804", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure adding Section 2-10.91 to the Santa Barbara County Code to create an Independent Redistricting Commission to adjust the boundaries of the supervisorial districts be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3979, "fingerprint": "2018|201800639|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800639|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "88ab83732d017c57", "measure_id": "201800639", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms/schools; replace outdated heating, air-conditioning systems; upgrade P.E. fields/facilities for school and community use; shall Lompoc Unified School District issue $79,000,000 bonds at legal rates, levy/collect approximately $0.06 per $100 assessed value (estimated $7 million annually) through approximately 2054, with citizen oversight, no money for salaries, all money staying local, without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5156, "no_votes": 4974, "total_votes": 10130, "percent_yes": 50.89832181638697, "percent_no": 49.10167818361303, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.160003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.598053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms/schools; replace outdated heating, air-conditioning systems; upgrade P.E. fields/facilities for school and community use; shall Lompoc Unified School District issue $79,000,000 bonds at legal rates, levy/collect approximately $0.06 per $100 assessed value (estimated $7 million annually) through approximately 2054, with citizen oversight, no money for salaries, all money staying local, without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3969, "fingerprint": "2018|201800408|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800408|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d6b55469bc3da5b1", "measure_id": "201800408", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund local improvements to parking, public safety, lighting, and sidewalks; provide tenant mediation services; create a municipal advisory council; and operate community facilities and events, shall voters authorize a utility user tax of 8% of the total cost of an individual service charge to the utilities of gas, water, electricity, sewer, and garbage disposal services generating approximately $642,000/year, until voters decide to end it?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1199, "no_votes": 229, "total_votes": 1428, "percent_yes": 83.96358543417367, "percent_no": 16.036414565826334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.157219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.595165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund local improvements to parking, public safety, lighting, and sidewalks; provide tenant mediation services; create a municipal advisory council; and operate community facilities and events, shall voters authorize a utility user tax of 8% of the total cost of an individual service charge to the utilities of gas, water, electricity, sewer, and garbage disposal services generating approximately $642,000/year, until voters decide to end it?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3978, "fingerprint": "2018|201800638|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800638|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "8e7554be323b1b02", "measure_id": "201800638", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support academic excellence; maintain safe facilities; fund Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs; protect art/music programs; and provide stable funding the State cannot eliminate; shall the Hope Elementary School District levy an education parcel tax of $79 annually for five years, raising approximately $360,000 annually, provide a senior citizens' exemption, have an independent citizens' oversight committee, with no funds for administrators' salaries, and require all funds to be spent on local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3514, "no_votes": 1538, "total_votes": 5052, "percent_yes": 69.55661124307206, "percent_no": 30.443388756927945, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.159671", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.597806", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support academic excellence; maintain safe facilities; fund Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs; protect art/music programs; and provide stable funding the State cannot eliminate; shall the Hope Elementary School District levy an education parcel tax of $79 annually for five years, raising approximately $360,000 annually, provide a senior citizens' exemption, have an independent citizens' oversight committee, with no funds for administrators' salaries, and require all funds to be spent on local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3966, "fingerprint": "2018|201800085|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800085|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "61a2c0f0d1dac012", "measure_id": "201800085", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure adding Chapter 50A to The Santa Barbara County Code imposing a Cannabis Operations Tax on cannabis operators within unincorporated areas of the County upon their gross receipts with rates of 1% on nurseries and distributors, 3% on manufacturers, 4% on cultivators and 6% on retailers and microbusinesses, estimated to raise $5 to $25 million annually for general governmental purposes such as law enforcement, health care, parks, roads and others, with no end date, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66161, "no_votes": 21091, "total_votes": 87252, "percent_yes": 75.827488195113, "percent_no": 24.172511804886994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.156340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.594618", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adding Chapter 50A to The Santa Barbara County Code imposing a Cannabis Operations Tax on cannabis operators within unincorporated areas of the County upon their gross receipts with rates of 1% on nurseries and distributors, 3% on manufacturers, 4% on cultivators and 6% on retailers and microbusinesses, estimated to raise $5 to $25 million annually for general governmental purposes such as law enforcement, health care, parks, roads and others, with no end date, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3976, "fingerprint": "2018|201800415|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800415|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "6b45c6d8767455a6", "measure_id": "201800415", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain/enhance essential services including neighborhood police patrols; firefighter staffing; gang suppression/enforcement; crime/graffiti/vandalism prevention; 911 medical response times; library, recreation, homelessness, at-risk youth programs; providing durable fiscal stability; shall the measure be approved adopting an ordinance extending Measure U at the one cent rate until ended by voters, providing $18,000,000 annually, with no funds taken by Sacramento, requiring oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13403, "no_votes": 4666, "total_votes": 18069, "percent_yes": 74.17676683823122, "percent_no": 25.823233161768783, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.159141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.597301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/enhance essential services including neighborhood police patrols; firefighter staffing; gang suppression/enforcement; crime/graffiti/vandalism prevention; 911 medical response times; library, recreation, homelessness, at-risk youth programs; providing durable fiscal stability; shall the measure be approved adopting an ordinance extending Measure U at the one cent rate until ended by voters, providing $18,000,000 annually, with no funds taken by Sacramento, requiring oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3971, "fingerprint": "2018|201800410|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800410|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "988daaa3dfb41174", "measure_id": "201800410", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing an annual salary for members of the City Council set at seventy-five percent (75%) of the nonfamily household median income for the City of Goleta as determined by the United States Census Bureau (resulting in a salary of $42,134) and for the Mayor at ninety percent (90%) of the nonfamily household median income for the City of Goleta (resulting in a salary of $50,561)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7823, "no_votes": 4239, "total_votes": 12062, "percent_yes": 64.85657436577682, "percent_no": 35.14342563422318, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.157760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.595845", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing an annual salary for members of the City Council set at seventy-five percent (75%) of the nonfamily household median income for the City of Goleta as determined by the United States Census Bureau (resulting in a salary of $42,134) and for the Mayor at ninety percent (90%) of the nonfamily household median income for the City of Goleta (resulting in a salary of $50,561)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3970, "fingerprint": "2018|201800409|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800409|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "e74581995d812276", "measure_id": "201800409", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain sheriff's deputies; improve disaster preparedness/response and communication during wildfires, floods, and other natural disasters; repair streets, potholes; protect local beaches/creeks from water pollution; prevent cuts to local library, senior, youth programs; address homelessness; and other general services; shall the measure be adopted to establish a 1\u00bc\u023c sales tax providing an estimated $2,300,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring annual audits, all funds for Carpinteria?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3016, "no_votes": 2340, "total_votes": 5356, "percent_yes": 56.310679611650485, "percent_no": 43.689320388349515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.157495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.595344", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain sheriff's deputies; improve disaster preparedness/response and communication during wildfires, floods, and other natural disasters; repair streets, potholes; protect local beaches/creeks from water pollution; prevent cuts to local library, senior, youth programs; address homelessness; and other general services; shall the measure be adopted to establish a 1\u00bc\u023c sales tax providing an estimated $2,300,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring annual audits, all funds for Carpinteria?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3980, "fingerprint": "2018|201800640|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800640|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d727d07873621df3", "measure_id": "201800640", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade educational facilities/provide 21st Century technology to affordably prepare local students for jobs/university transfer, update classrooms/labs for career training in public safety, design, computer graphics, theatrical arts; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall this Allan Hancock Joint Community College District measure to issue $75,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates/replace bonds authorized in 2006, levy 1.1 cents/$100 assessed value, $2,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be approved, with oversight, audits, no administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29222, "no_votes": 31386, "total_votes": 60608, "percent_yes": 48.21475712777191, "percent_no": 51.78524287222809, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.160271", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.598319", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade educational facilities/provide 21st Century technology to affordably prepare local students for jobs/university transfer, update classrooms/labs for career training in public safety, design, computer graphics, theatrical arts; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall this Allan Hancock Joint Community College District measure to issue $75,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates/replace bonds authorized in 2006, levy 1.1 cents/$100 assessed value, $2,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be approved, with oversight, audits, no administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3972, "fingerprint": "2018|201800411|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800411|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "208a55a9f1a2e05d", "measure_id": "201800411", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a Cannabis Business Tax on gross receipts of cannabis businesses from the sale of cannabis and related products, whether at wholesale or retail, at a rate not to exceed 10%, with initial rates of 5% (retailers), 2% (manufacturers), 4% (cultivators), and 1% (distributors and nurseries) estimated to raise $334,000 to $1,423,000 for unrestricted general revenue purposes such as street repair, parks and police, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10518, "no_votes": 2316, "total_votes": 12834, "percent_yes": 81.95418419822347, "percent_no": 18.045815801776527, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.158077", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.596253", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a Cannabis Business Tax on gross receipts of cannabis businesses from the sale of cannabis and related products, whether at wholesale or retail, at a rate not to exceed 10%, with initial rates of 5% (retailers), 2% (manufacturers), 4% (cultivators), and 1% (distributors and nurseries) estimated to raise $334,000 to $1,423,000 for unrestricted general revenue purposes such as street repair, parks and police, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3984, "fingerprint": "2018|201800089|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800089|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "66f1eab88ec36eff", "measure_id": "201800089", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall AARON PERSKY be recalled (removed) from the office of Judge of the Superior Court?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 202849, "no_votes": 126459, "total_votes": 329308, "percent_yes": 61.598564262028255, "percent_no": 38.401435737971745, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.161452", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.599333", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall AARON PERSKY be recalled (removed) from the office of Judge of the Superior Court?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11215, "fingerprint": "2018|201800419|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800419|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "7d066bf1996d4017", "measure_id": "201800419", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended: to establish two districts starting in 2018 to be represented by three Council Members each; and, when available, use ranked choice voting to allow voters to select candidates in order of choice to determine the winners of elections of all city elected officers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10023, "no_votes": 9169, "total_votes": 19192, "percent_yes": 52.224885368903706, "percent_no": 47.775114631096294, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.617099", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.162526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.600289", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended: to establish two districts starting in 2018 to be represented by three Council Members each; and, when available, use ranked choice voting to allow voters to select candidates in order of choice to determine the winners of elections of all city elected officers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3985, "fingerprint": "2018|201800090|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800090|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "68f2a2323e0f77eb", "measure_id": "201800090", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Santa Clara continue its existing one-eighth cent sales tax on an ongoing basis, estimated to raise $50,000,000 annually, with annual public reports for fiscal accountability?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 433171, "no_votes": 150582, "total_votes": 583753, "percent_yes": 74.20450087622676, "percent_no": 25.79549912377324, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.161717", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.599668", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Santa Clara continue its existing one-eighth cent sales tax on an ongoing basis, estimated to raise $50,000,000 annually, with annual public reports for fiscal accountability?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4011, "fingerprint": "2018|201800652|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800652|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "683027023cd845a5", "measure_id": "201800652", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety, provide additional classrooms and science labs to relieve elementary, middle and high school overcrowding; repair leaky roofs; update technology; and repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall Milpitas Unified School District's measure authorizing $284,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying $60/$100,000 assessed value, averaging $21,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13479, "no_votes": 5397, "total_votes": 18876, "percent_yes": 71.40813731722822, "percent_no": 28.591862682771776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.173208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.605865", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety, provide additional classrooms and science labs to relieve elementary, middle and high school overcrowding; repair leaky roofs; update technology; and repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall Milpitas Unified School District's measure authorizing $284,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levying $60/$100,000 assessed value, averaging $21,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3986, "fingerprint": "2018|201800417|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800417|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a6b9c52ca1dcfdd5", "measure_id": "201800417", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure be adopted: (1) changing San Jos\u00e9\u2019s General Plan to create a Senior Housing Overlay to allow conversion of land designated for employment use to senior housing citywide; and (2) changing the Evergreen-East Hills Development Policy and Municipal Code, and adding a Specific Plan to allow development of up to 910 residential units on an approximately 200-acre Industrial Site in Evergreen for individuals 55 and over and other qualifying individuals?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 99206, "no_votes": 68936, "total_votes": 168142, "percent_yes": 59.00132031259293, "percent_no": 40.99867968740707, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.161986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.599895", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure be adopted: (1) changing San Jos\u00e9\u2019s General Plan to create a Senior Housing Overlay to allow conversion of land designated for employment use to senior housing citywide; and (2) changing the Evergreen-East Hills Development Policy and Municipal Code, and adding a Specific Plan to allow development of up to 910 residential units on an approximately 200-acre Industrial Site in Evergreen for individuals 55 and over and other qualifying individuals?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4015, "fingerprint": "2018|201800656|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800656|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "34a7d9006c8245fb", "measure_id": "201800656", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct classrooms, labs, and school libraries to support student achievement, college readiness, and career training in math, science, engineering, technology, and arts; acquire, renovate, construct and equip facilities to improve older schools; to fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, shall Santa Clara Unified School District issue $720 million in bonds, raising approximately 5 cents/$100 of assessed value ($45 million annually) for 32 years to improve local schools, with independent citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27512, "no_votes": 13339, "total_votes": 40851, "percent_yes": 67.34718856331547, "percent_no": 32.65281143668453, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.174571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.606603", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct classrooms, labs, and school libraries to support student achievement, college readiness, and career training in math, science, engineering, technology, and arts; acquire, renovate, construct and equip facilities to improve older schools; to fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, shall Santa Clara Unified School District issue $720 million in bonds, raising approximately 5 cents/$100 of assessed value ($45 million annually) for 32 years to improve local schools, with independent citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11216, "fingerprint": "2018|201800421|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800421|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "2a5c8308d30eba91", "measure_id": "201800421", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an amendment to the City of Los Altos General Plan be adopted requiring voter approval of the sale, lease or certain changes in use of certain land designated as \u201cParks\u201d, \u201cOther Open Space\u201d or \u201cPublic and Institutional\u201d in the City\u2019s General Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8542, "no_votes": 7562, "total_votes": 16104, "percent_yes": 53.042722305017385, "percent_no": 46.957277694982615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.617746", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.163167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.600669", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an amendment to the City of Los Altos General Plan be adopted requiring voter approval of the sale, lease or certain changes in use of certain land designated as \u201cParks\u201d, \u201cOther Open Space\u201d or \u201cPublic and Institutional\u201d in the City\u2019s General Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3987, "fingerprint": "2018|201800418|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800418|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6311e2185806c73f", "measure_id": "201800418", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall San Jose's Charter be amended, notwithstanding any measure on the June 5, 2018 ballot or other San Jose law, to restrict development of non-employment uses on designated lands in outlying areas near San Jose's Urban Growth Boundary, including Almaden Valley, Coyote Valley, and Evergreen foothills, unless the City Council determines such Development will not adversely affect the City financially, will satisfy increased affordable housing requirements, and will mitigate environmental impacts and pay appropriate fees or road improvements to address traffic impacts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 99235, "no_votes": 63905, "total_votes": 163140, "percent_yes": 60.828123084467336, "percent_no": 39.171876915532664, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.162252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.600101", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall San Jose's Charter be amended, notwithstanding any measure on the June 5, 2018 ballot or other San Jose law, to restrict development of non-employment uses on designated lands in outlying areas near San Jose's Urban Growth Boundary, including Almaden Valley, Coyote Valley, and Evergreen foothills, unless the City Council determines such Development will not adversely affect the City financially, will satisfy increased affordable housing requirements, and will mitigate environmental impacts and pay appropriate fees or road improvements to address traffic impacts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4008, "fingerprint": "2018|201800649|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800649|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1f77b8d6241d46d5", "measure_id": "201800649", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade school safety and security systems; repair leaky roofs and windows, support programs in science, technology, English, arts, and math with 21st century infrastructure; provide essential seismic upgrades, and acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities and equipment; shall Fremont Union High School District issue $275 million in bonds at legal rates, raising an estimated $17.5 million annually until approximately 2050 at projected rates of 1.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44844, "no_votes": 24566, "total_votes": 69410, "percent_yes": 64.60740527301542, "percent_no": 35.39259472698458, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.172164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.605293", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade school safety and security systems; repair leaky roofs and windows, support programs in science, technology, English, arts, and math with 21st century infrastructure; provide essential seismic upgrades, and acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities and equipment; shall Fremont Union High School District issue $275 million in bonds at legal rates, raising an estimated $17.5 million annually until approximately 2050 at projected rates of 1.6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3989, "fingerprint": "2018|201800422|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800422|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "47c04bd808da3d6d", "measure_id": "201800422", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the maximum Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax rate from 11% to 14% of rent paid by a hotel guest for transient occupancy of any hotel/lodging, generating approximately $700,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9141, "no_votes": 6369, "total_votes": 15510, "percent_yes": 58.93617021276596, "percent_no": 41.06382978723404, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.163440", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.600857", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the maximum Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax rate from 11% to 14% of rent paid by a hotel guest for transient occupancy of any hotel/lodging, generating approximately $700,000 annually for unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11220, "fingerprint": "2018|201800646|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800646|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8e206a29a9759499", "measure_id": "201800646", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood high schools by expanding classrooms, science labs, libraries/student support facilities to accommodate growing enrollment; modernizing science, technology, engineering, arts/math classrooms for 21st-century learning; and repairing, upgrading/constructing classrooms/school facilities; shall Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District issue $295,000,000 of bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight/audits, averaging $18 million raised annually for bonds until approximately 2039, from rates estimated at $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, with all funds exclusively for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18961, "no_votes": 8924, "total_votes": 27885, "percent_yes": 67.99713107405415, "percent_no": 32.00286892594585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.622167", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.171103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.604732", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood high schools by expanding classrooms, science labs, libraries/student support facilities to accommodate growing enrollment; modernizing science, technology, engineering, arts/math classrooms for 21st-century learning; and repairing, upgrading/constructing classrooms/school facilities; shall Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District issue $295,000,000 of bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight/audits, averaging $18 million raised annually for bonds until approximately 2039, from rates estimated at $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, with all funds exclusively for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3997, "fingerprint": "2018|201800430|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800430|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ec295946ac69b3fe", "measure_id": "201800430", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for vital City services such as ensuring modern, stable 911 emergency communications, earthquake safe fire stations and emergency command center; improving pedestrian and bicyclist safety; ensuring safe routes to schools; maintaining City streets and sidewalks; and other city services, shall the City of Palo Alto adopt an ordinance increasing the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel, motel, short-term rental guests by 1.5%, providing approximately $2.55 million annually until ended by voters, subject to annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20547, "no_votes": 9249, "total_votes": 29796, "percent_yes": 68.95892066049134, "percent_no": 31.041079339508656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.166858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.602311", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for vital City services such as ensuring modern, stable 911 emergency communications, earthquake safe fire stations and emergency command center; improving pedestrian and bicyclist safety; ensuring safe routes to schools; maintaining City streets and sidewalks; and other city services, shall the City of Palo Alto adopt an ordinance increasing the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel, motel, short-term rental guests by 1.5%, providing approximately $2.55 million annually until ended by voters, subject to annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4007, "fingerprint": "2018|201800648|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800648|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "90e48a17123ac34b", "measure_id": "201800648", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Evergreen Elementary School District renew an existing parcel tax at $125 per parcel for 7 years generating $3.1 million annually, with citizen oversight, annual reports, senior exemptions, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries or the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21009, "no_votes": 8916, "total_votes": 29925, "percent_yes": 70.20551378446115, "percent_no": 29.794486215538853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.171871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.605104", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Evergreen Elementary School District renew an existing parcel tax at $125 per parcel for 7 years generating $3.1 million annually, with citizen oversight, annual reports, senior exemptions, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries or the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3998, "fingerprint": "2018|201800431|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800431|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0b642b3524a6498c", "measure_id": "201800431", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Palo Alto Municipal Code be amended to regulate and limit the amount that hospitals, medical clinics and other health care providers in Palo Alto may charge patients or other individuals, primary insurers, secondary insurers, and other payers, excluding government payers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22463, "no_votes": 6905, "total_votes": 29368, "percent_yes": 76.48801416507763, "percent_no": 23.51198583492237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.167127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.602494", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Palo Alto Municipal Code be amended to regulate and limit the amount that hospitals, medical clinics and other health care providers in Palo Alto may charge patients or other individuals, primary insurers, secondary insurers, and other payers, excluding government payers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11218, "fingerprint": "2018|201800644|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800644|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "06b29adf0aa70960", "measure_id": "201800644", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support quality education for East Side Union High School District students, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, to maintain: 21st century science, technology, engineering, math, reading, writing instruction; college preparation; career/technical education in computers, arts, hands-on science, business; attract/retain high quality teachers, counselors, staff; shall the measure to levy $49 per parcel for 7 years be adopted, raising $6 million annually, exempting senior citizens, requiring independent oversight, with all funds supporting classroom instruction?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50475, "no_votes": 26546, "total_votes": 77021, "percent_yes": 65.53407512236923, "percent_no": 34.46592487763077, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.621774", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.170381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.604361", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support quality education for East Side Union High School District students, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, to maintain: 21st century science, technology, engineering, math, reading, writing instruction; college preparation; career/technical education in computers, arts, hands-on science, business; attract/retain high quality teachers, counselors, staff; shall the measure to levy $49 per parcel for 7 years be adopted, raising $6 million annually, exempting senior citizens, requiring independent oversight, with all funds supporting classroom instruction?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3990, "fingerprint": "2018|201800423|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800423|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "aafeaf30a948b843", "measure_id": "201800423", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to fund essential Town services such as maintaining neighborhood police patrols; improving traffic flow to reduce congestion; repairing potholes and fixing neighborhood streets; maintaining the Town\u2019s long-term financial stability and other unrestricted general revenue purposes by enacting a one-eighth cent ($0.125%) sales tax for 20 years, providing about $800,000 annually, requiring Independent Citizens Oversight with public review of spending, and all revenues controlled locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8062, "no_votes": 6691, "total_votes": 14753, "percent_yes": 54.64651257371382, "percent_no": 45.35348742628618, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.164156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.601037", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to fund essential Town services such as maintaining neighborhood police patrols; improving traffic flow to reduce congestion; repairing potholes and fixing neighborhood streets; maintaining the Town\u2019s long-term financial stability and other unrestricted general revenue purposes by enacting a one-eighth cent ($0.125%) sales tax for 20 years, providing about $800,000 annually, requiring Independent Citizens Oversight with public review of spending, and all revenues controlled locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4016, "fingerprint": "2018|201800657|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800657|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "2930f18486d4a212", "measure_id": "201800657", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue critical renovation and modernization at District schools, improve energy efficiency, upgrade safety and technology to provide high quality classrooms and maintain facilities for students and the community, shall Sunnyvale School District issue $100 million in bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average of $6 million annually for 32 years, at a rate of one cent per $100 of assessed value, with independent oversight, accountability and all funds benefitting local elementary and middle schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15771, "no_votes": 6468, "total_votes": 22239, "percent_yes": 70.91595845136922, "percent_no": 29.08404154863078, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.174842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.606784", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue critical renovation and modernization at District schools, improve energy efficiency, upgrade safety and technology to provide high quality classrooms and maintain facilities for students and the community, shall Sunnyvale School District issue $100 million in bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average of $6 million annually for 32 years, at a rate of one cent per $100 of assessed value, with independent oversight, accountability and all funds benefitting local elementary and middle schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11217, "fingerprint": "2018|201800643|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800643|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "bef9294f08cec605", "measure_id": "201800643", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide Cambrian neighborhood elementary and middle school students with stable funding for instruction in math, science, reading, engineering, technology, and arts; retain highly qualified teachers; and maintain class sizes; shall Cambrian School District establish an annual parcel tax of $84 for 8 years, its continuance subject to voter approval, raising approximately $740,000 in the first year, subject to annual adjustment; with exemptions for senior citizens, no funds for administrator\u2019s salaries and every dollar benefitting Cambrian children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4877, "no_votes": 2356, "total_votes": 7233, "percent_yes": 67.42707037190654, "percent_no": 32.57292962809346, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.621572", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.170084", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.604165", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide Cambrian neighborhood elementary and middle school students with stable funding for instruction in math, science, reading, engineering, technology, and arts; retain highly qualified teachers; and maintain class sizes; shall Cambrian School District establish an annual parcel tax of $84 for 8 years, its continuance subject to voter approval, raising approximately $740,000 in the first year, subject to annual adjustment; with exemptions for senior citizens, no funds for administrator\u2019s salaries and every dollar benefitting Cambrian children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3992, "fingerprint": "2018|201800425|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800425|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e439308ddccb44bd", "measure_id": "201800425", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Morgan Hill ordinance providing funding, that cannot be taken by the State, for city services including, 9-1-1 emergency response times, neighborhood police patrols, and crime prevention; to repair potholes and maintain city streets; and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, by increasing the ongoing transient occupancy tax charged to hotel guests from l0% to 11%, providing approximately $270,000 annually, requiring financial audits, and all funds staying in Morgan Hill, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13008, "no_votes": 3409, "total_votes": 16417, "percent_yes": 79.23493939209357, "percent_no": 20.765060607906435, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.165148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.601412", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Morgan Hill ordinance providing funding, that cannot be taken by the State, for city services including, 9-1-1 emergency response times, neighborhood police patrols, and crime prevention; to repair potholes and maintain city streets; and for unrestricted general revenue purposes, by increasing the ongoing transient occupancy tax charged to hotel guests from l0% to 11%, providing approximately $270,000 annually, requiring financial audits, and all funds staying in Morgan Hill, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4010, "fingerprint": "2018|201800651|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800651|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "fa87e75ce33eb534", "measure_id": "201800651", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace the Luther Burbank School District\u2019s main building with a modern, state-of-the-art facility to provide students with a safe, secure, 21st century learning environment, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the District\u2019s measure authorizing $10,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of $685,000 annually to repay bonds through final maturity from levies of approximately 8.8 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, and no money for administrator salaries, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 668, "no_votes": 297, "total_votes": 965, "percent_yes": 69.22279792746114, "percent_no": 30.777202072538856, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.172929", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.605674", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace the Luther Burbank School District\u2019s main building with a modern, state-of-the-art facility to provide students with a safe, secure, 21st century learning environment, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the District\u2019s measure authorizing $10,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, raising an average of $685,000 annually to repay bonds through final maturity from levies of approximately 8.8 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, and no money for administrator salaries, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3993, "fingerprint": "2018|201800426|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800426|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "076be9672277eed1", "measure_id": "201800426", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Morgan Hill ordinance, to fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads,\r\nrecreation, and drug abuse prevention, by taxing cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $15.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation) and up to 10% of\r\ngross receipts for all other cannabis businesses, which is expected to generate an estimated $340,000 to $750,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12765, "no_votes": 3380, "total_votes": 16145, "percent_yes": 79.06472592133788, "percent_no": 20.93527407866212, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.165598", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.601594", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Morgan Hill ordinance, to fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, roads,\r\nrecreation, and drug abuse prevention, by taxing cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $15.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation) and up to 10% of\r\ngross receipts for all other cannabis businesses, which is expected to generate an estimated $340,000 to $750,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3994, "fingerprint": "2018|201800427|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800427|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "201800427", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9437, "no_votes": 5804, "total_votes": 15241, "percent_yes": 61.91850928416771, "percent_no": 38.08149071583229, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.166020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.601773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4012, "fingerprint": "2018|201800653|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800653|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c3bd9cc8ac73c058", "measure_id": "201800653", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair leaking roofs, dry rot, termite and structural damage, upgrade wiring, fire alarms and fencing to improve student safety, repair deteriorating restrooms, and acquire, renovate, construct classrooms, equipment, sits and facilities, shall this Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District measure authorizing $27,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $0.3 cents/$100 assessed value, $1,600,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions/benefits, and all money benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3932, "no_votes": 1659, "total_votes": 5591, "percent_yes": 70.32731175102845, "percent_no": 29.672688248971554, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.173482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.606051", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair leaking roofs, dry rot, termite and structural damage, upgrade wiring, fire alarms and fencing to improve student safety, repair deteriorating restrooms, and acquire, renovate, construct classrooms, equipment, sits and facilities, shall this Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District measure authorizing $27,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $0.3 cents/$100 assessed value, $1,600,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions/benefits, and all money benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4005, "fingerprint": "2018|201800438|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800438|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c3086a4052c1ca5f", "measure_id": "201800438", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Sunnyvale adopt an ordinance increasing the transient occupancy tax paid only by hotel guests from 10.5% to 12.5%, providing approximately $2,900,000 additional revenue annually until ended by voters, with independent audits, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32743, "no_votes": 8951, "total_votes": 41694, "percent_yes": 78.53168321581043, "percent_no": 21.468316784189568, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.169530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.603791", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Sunnyvale adopt an ordinance increasing the transient occupancy tax paid only by hotel guests from 10.5% to 12.5%, providing approximately $2,900,000 additional revenue annually until ended by voters, with independent audits, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4006, "fingerprint": "2018|201800439|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800439|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3b1bc8eacaa07354", "measure_id": "201800439", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sunnyvale City Charter section 604 be amended to allow the City Council to decide whether to\r\nfill a City Council vacancy by calling a special election, or by making an appointment, with the person appointed to fill the vacancy holding the office until a successor is elected at the next regularly scheduled municipal or statewide election that can be consolidated?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28163, "no_votes": 11290, "total_votes": 39453, "percent_yes": 71.38367171064304, "percent_no": 28.616328289356957, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.169801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.603970", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sunnyvale City Charter section 604 be amended to allow the City Council to decide whether to\r\nfill a City Council vacancy by calling a special election, or by making an appointment, with the person appointed to fill the vacancy holding the office until a successor is elected at the next regularly scheduled municipal or statewide election that can be consolidated?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4003, "fingerprint": "2018|201800436|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800436|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1703ec3f1f05390b", "measure_id": "201800436", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain fiscal stability/essential city services, including rapid 911 emergency response times; preventing cuts to police officers/firefighters; repairing streets/potholes; maintaining library/youth/senior services, shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a tax on commercial cannabis up to 10% of gross receipts and up to $25 per square foot for cultivation, generating approximately $2,200,000 annually until ended by voters, with annual independent audits, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25613, "no_votes": 7789, "total_votes": 33402, "percent_yes": 76.68103706364889, "percent_no": 23.318962936351113, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.168851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.603429", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain fiscal stability/essential city services, including rapid 911 emergency response times; preventing cuts to police officers/firefighters; repairing streets/potholes; maintaining library/youth/senior services, shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a tax on commercial cannabis up to 10% of gross receipts and up to $25 per square foot for cultivation, generating approximately $2,200,000 annually until ended by voters, with annual independent audits, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4004, "fingerprint": "2018|201800437|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800437|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6a679da034034ea5", "measure_id": "201800437", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Clara engage the voters in a public process to draft a Charter Amendment ballot measure to elect its Council Members, other than the Mayor, by district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21902, "no_votes": 9208, "total_votes": 31110, "percent_yes": 70.40180006428801, "percent_no": 29.59819993571199, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.169122", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.603611", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Clara engage the voters in a public process to draft a Charter Amendment ballot measure to elect its Council Members, other than the Mayor, by district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3988, "fingerprint": "2018|201800420|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800420|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "60bd19d16b91d48e", "measure_id": "201800420", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide a police emergency operations center that is fully operational during a disaster and an\r\ninnovative library in seismically safe, accessible, and energy-efficient facilities meeting current safety codes, shall the City of Campbell\u2019s measure to issue $50,000,000 in general obligation bonds with projected levies of $0.019 per $100 ($19 per $100,000) of assessed value, generating an estimated average of $3,025,000 annually to repay bonds through maturity, with citizen oversight and all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11071, "no_votes": 4836, "total_votes": 15907, "percent_yes": 69.59829006097944, "percent_no": 30.401709939020563, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.162841", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.600475", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a police emergency operations center that is fully operational during a disaster and an\r\ninnovative library in seismically safe, accessible, and energy-efficient facilities meeting current safety codes, shall the City of Campbell\u2019s measure to issue $50,000,000 in general obligation bonds with projected levies of $0.019 per $100 ($19 per $100,000) of assessed value, generating an estimated average of $3,025,000 annually to repay bonds through maturity, with citizen oversight and all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3995, "fingerprint": "2018|201800428|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800428|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5956117e6df753b7", "measure_id": "201800428", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to fund critical City needs such as reducing traffic congestion, enhancing bicycle/pedestrian friendly routes, providing housing affordable for a range of incomes/homeless services, by imposing a business license tax of between $8 and $149 per employee on average, with larger companies paying more per employee, generating about $6 million yearly for unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters, with independent yearly audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19011, "no_votes": 7747, "total_votes": 26758, "percent_yes": 71.04791090514986, "percent_no": 28.952089094850137, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.166302", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.601951", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to fund critical City needs such as reducing traffic congestion, enhancing bicycle/pedestrian friendly routes, providing housing affordable for a range of incomes/homeless services, by imposing a business license tax of between $8 and $149 per employee on average, with larger companies paying more per employee, generating about $6 million yearly for unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters, with independent yearly audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3996, "fingerprint": "2018|201800429|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800429|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "be94f0549439d46a", "measure_id": "201800429", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to maintain and protect essential public safety services, including 9-1-1, police and fire protection, emergency medical response; reduce traffic congestion and repair roads; and provide other critical City services, including library, park maintenance, senior services, by levying a tax of up to 9 percent on gross receipts of cannabis businesses, providing about 1 million dollars per year, for unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters, with independent yearly audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21694, "no_votes": 4952, "total_votes": 26646, "percent_yes": 81.415597087743, "percent_no": 18.584402912257005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.166583", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.602131", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to maintain and protect essential public safety services, including 9-1-1, police and fire protection, emergency medical response; reduce traffic congestion and repair roads; and provide other critical City services, including library, park maintenance, senior services, by levying a tax of up to 9 percent on gross receipts of cannabis businesses, providing about 1 million dollars per year, for unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters, with independent yearly audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11219, "fingerprint": "2018|201800645|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800645|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cebc08acbeb98a81", "measure_id": "201800645", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair Loma Prieta School District\u2019s fire-damaged classrooms and community center, update fire alarms, water systems, electrical/heating and plumbing systems, meet health/safety codes, modernize aging classroom technology, acquire, repair, construct, equipment/sites with funding that cannot be taken by the State shall this Loma Prieta Joint Union School District measure be adopted to issue $10,600,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($670,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits and citizens oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 284, "no_votes": 107, "total_votes": 391, "percent_yes": 72.63427109974424, "percent_no": 27.36572890025576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.621972", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.170789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.604544", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair Loma Prieta School District\u2019s fire-damaged classrooms and community center, update fire alarms, water systems, electrical/heating and plumbing systems, meet health/safety codes, modernize aging classroom technology, acquire, repair, construct, equipment/sites with funding that cannot be taken by the State shall this Loma Prieta Joint Union School District measure be adopted to issue $10,600,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($670,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits and citizens oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3991, "fingerprint": "2018|201800424|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800424|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "072c38760df39d02", "measure_id": "201800424", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding to maintain general city services, including police/fire protection, 9-1-1 emergency response, senior/library services, park maintenance, pothole repair/street paving and attracting/retaining local businesses, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the maximum transient occupancy tax paid by hotel guests from 10% up to as much as 14%, providing approximately $5,200,000 annually until ended by voters, subject to independent, public audits, with all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12552, "no_votes": 5971, "total_votes": 18523, "percent_yes": 67.76440101495437, "percent_no": 32.23559898504563, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.164689", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.601227", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding to maintain general city services, including police/fire protection, 9-1-1 emergency response, senior/library services, park maintenance, pothole repair/street paving and attracting/retaining local businesses, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the maximum transient occupancy tax paid by hotel guests from 10% up to as much as 14%, providing approximately $5,200,000 annually until ended by voters, subject to independent, public audits, with all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3983, "fingerprint": "2018|201800088|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800088|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f4af79b0371f2d65", "measure_id": "201800088", "measure_letter": "RM3", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 212661, "no_votes": 133488, "total_votes": 346149, "percent_yes": 61.4362601076415, "percent_no": 38.5637398923585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.161156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.599087", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 3999, "fingerprint": "2018|201800432|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800432|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "bebc160a828b1e09", "measure_id": "201800432", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Jos\u00e9 Charter be amended to:1) Prioritize selecting contractors on cost, but enable consideration of factors like experience and work quality; 2) Increase opportunities for small, local, and economically disadvantaged businesses to compete for contracts; 3) Modify the bidding threshold from $100,000 to $600,000, adjusted annually for inflation; 4) Lower the \u201cdesign-build\u201d contract threshold from $5,000,000 to $1,000,000; and 5) Allow modernization of public noticing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 218424, "no_votes": 56377, "total_votes": 274801, "percent_yes": 79.48442691256582, "percent_no": 20.515573087434177, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.167526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.602673", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Jos\u00e9 Charter be amended to:1) Prioritize selecting contractors on cost, but enable consideration of factors like experience and work quality; 2) Increase opportunities for small, local, and economically disadvantaged businesses to compete for contracts; 3) Modify the bidding threshold from $100,000 to $600,000, adjusted annually for inflation; 4) Lower the \u201cdesign-build\u201d contract threshold from $5,000,000 to $1,000,000; and 5) Allow modernization of public noticing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4000, "fingerprint": "2018|201800433|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800433|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "fdcc25552d61024d", "measure_id": "201800433", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall San Jos\u00e9 issue $650,000,000 in general obligation bonds with an average levy of 11\u00a2 per $1,000 of assessed value, averaging $34,208,000 annually until repaid, requiring community oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 197110, "no_votes": 80687, "total_votes": 277797, "percent_yes": 70.95468993545647, "percent_no": 29.04531006454353, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.167802", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.602860", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall San Jos\u00e9 issue $650,000,000 in general obligation bonds with an average levy of 11\u00a2 per $1,000 of assessed value, averaging $34,208,000 annually until repaid, requiring community oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4001, "fingerprint": "2018|201800434|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800434|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1b1309d9123ad59d", "measure_id": "201800434", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Jos\u00e9 Charter be amended to: 1) Remove the Mayor and Council\u2019s ability to approve their salaries; 2) Require the Salary Setting Commission to adjust the base salaries for the Mayor and City Council once every five years; 3) Limit base salary increases after each 5-year adjustment to annual adjustments for inflation; and 4) Align the City Charter with State law to allow the City Council to place competing ordinances on the same ballot in Municipal Elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 232246, "no_votes": 38034, "total_votes": 270280, "percent_yes": 85.92792659464259, "percent_no": 14.072073405357415, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.168081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.603043", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Jos\u00e9 Charter be amended to: 1) Remove the Mayor and Council\u2019s ability to approve their salaries; 2) Require the Salary Setting Commission to adjust the base salaries for the Mayor and City Council once every five years; 3) Limit base salary increases after each 5-year adjustment to annual adjustments for inflation; and 4) Align the City Charter with State law to allow the City Council to place competing ordinances on the same ballot in Municipal Elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11221, "fingerprint": "2018|201800647|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800647|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5a43c09fe55818f5", "measure_id": "201800647", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair Patterson\u2019s classrooms, construct classrooms for 21st Century learning/reduce overcrowding, make fire safety/security improvements, replace aging plumbing/sewer/electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall the measure be adopted to reauthorize the $33,852,058.10 Patterson Joint Unified School District bonds approved in 2008 as new bonds, at legal rates, levy on average 6 cents/$100 assessed value ($2,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with taxpayer oversight, audits, no increase in total authorized District debt?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 31, "percent_yes": 61.29032258064516, "percent_no": 38.70967741935484, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.622363", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.171586", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.604913", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair Patterson\u2019s classrooms, construct classrooms for 21st Century learning/reduce overcrowding, make fire safety/security improvements, replace aging plumbing/sewer/electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall the measure be adopted to reauthorize the $33,852,058.10 Patterson Joint Unified School District bonds approved in 2008 as new bonds, at legal rates, levy on average 6 cents/$100 assessed value ($2,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with taxpayer oversight, audits, no increase in total authorized District debt?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4002, "fingerprint": "2018|201800435|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800435|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "87e7bd56c9f08f13", "measure_id": "201800435", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide housing affordable for: working families; veterans; seniors; teachers, nurses, paramedics, and other workers; and helping homeless residents get off of local streets and out of neighborhood parks and creeks; Shall San Jos\u00e9 issue $450,000,000 in general obligation bonds with an average levy of 8 cents per $1,000 of assessed value, averaging $26,217,000 annually until repaid, requiring community oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 177525, "no_votes": 99816, "total_votes": 277341, "percent_yes": 64.00964877172866, "percent_no": 35.99035122827134, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.168358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.603239", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide housing affordable for: working families; veterans; seniors; teachers, nurses, paramedics, and other workers; and helping homeless residents get off of local streets and out of neighborhood parks and creeks; Shall San Jos\u00e9 issue $450,000,000 in general obligation bonds with an average levy of 8 cents per $1,000 of assessed value, averaging $26,217,000 annually until repaid, requiring community oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4017, "fingerprint": "2018|201800658|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800658|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4bcef3b7d543bc4b", "measure_id": "201800658", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade educational facilities/technology to prepare students/veterans for 21st-century jobs, university transfer; update science, engineering, math classrooms, labs for nursing/healthcare careers; acquire, construct, repair, classrooms, facilities, sites, equipment; shall West Valley-Mission Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $698,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $13/$100,000 assessed value averaging $39,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with oversight, audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/ pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83285, "no_votes": 54447, "total_votes": 137732, "percent_yes": 60.468881596143234, "percent_no": 39.531118403856766, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.175125", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.606965", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade educational facilities/technology to prepare students/veterans for 21st-century jobs, university transfer; update science, engineering, math classrooms, labs for nursing/healthcare careers; acquire, construct, repair, classrooms, facilities, sites, equipment; shall West Valley-Mission Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $698,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $13/$100,000 assessed value averaging $39,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with oversight, audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/ pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4009, "fingerprint": "2018|201800650|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800650|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "37b47530ca0bcc2f", "measure_id": "201800650", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, science, healthcare, technology, engineering/career training labs, repair aging facilities, shall Gavilan Joint Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $248,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents/$100 assessed value, $14,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, constructing, acquiring, repairing classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, Veterans Center, adding a campus in San Benito County, improving local access to affordable education, with citizen oversight, all money locally controlled, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26799, "no_votes": 16103, "total_votes": 42902, "percent_yes": 62.4656193184467, "percent_no": 37.5343806815533, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.172446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.605485", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, science, healthcare, technology, engineering/career training labs, repair aging facilities, shall Gavilan Joint Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $248,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2 cents/$100 assessed value, $14,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, constructing, acquiring, repairing classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, Veterans Center, adding a campus in San Benito County, improving local access to affordable education, with citizen oversight, all money locally controlled, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4013, "fingerprint": "2018|201800654|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800654|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "fe052f9fad459491", "measure_id": "201800654", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Members of the Palo Alto Unified School District Board of Education be limited to two\r\nconsecutive terms of office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24009, "no_votes": 8796, "total_votes": 32805, "percent_yes": 73.18701417466849, "percent_no": 26.81298582533151, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.173770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.606238", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Members of the Palo Alto Unified School District Board of Education be limited to two\r\nconsecutive terms of office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4014, "fingerprint": "2018|201800655|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800655|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "841ed5397402f543", "measure_id": "201800655", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe/modern schools; upgrade aging classrooms, libraries, science labs, school facilities; improve accessibility for students with disabilities; enhance student safety/security by upgrading seismic safety, fire alarms, door locks, emergency communication; provide classrooms/labs supporting science, technology, engineering, arts programs, shall Palo Alto Unified School District issue $460,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy approximately $39.40 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $29,500,000 annually for 28 years, with independent oversight and all funds benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23013, "no_votes": 10166, "total_votes": 33179, "percent_yes": 69.3601374363302, "percent_no": 30.639862563669794, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.174231", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.606420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe/modern schools; upgrade aging classrooms, libraries, science labs, school facilities; improve accessibility for students with disabilities; enhance student safety/security by upgrading seismic safety, fire alarms, door locks, emergency communication; provide classrooms/labs supporting science, technology, engineering, arts programs, shall Palo Alto Unified School District issue $460,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy approximately $39.40 per $100,000 of assessed value, generating approximately $29,500,000 annually for 28 years, with independent oversight and all funds benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4033, "fingerprint": "2018|201800662|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800662|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "6e2670923af07550", "measure_id": "201800662", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality core educational programs, prevent cuts in math, science, technology, reading,  and the  arts, attract and retain highly qualified teachers and counselors, and keep up with technology, shall \"Scotts Valley Unified School District\" levy an annual education parcel tax of $108 per parcel for five years, with independent community oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, pensions or benefits, senior and disabled exemptions, raising $820,000 annually in funding for \"Scotts Valley Unified School District\" that can't be taken away by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6815, "no_votes": 2826, "total_votes": 9641, "percent_yes": 70.68768799917021, "percent_no": 29.31231200082979, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.180377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.609937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality core educational programs, prevent cuts in math, science, technology, reading,  and the  arts, attract and retain highly qualified teachers and counselors, and keep up with technology, shall \"Scotts Valley Unified School District\" levy an annual education parcel tax of $108 per parcel for five years, with independent community oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, pensions or benefits, senior and disabled exemptions, raising $820,000 annually in funding for \"Scotts Valley Unified School District\" that can't be taken away by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4034, "fingerprint": "2018|201800663|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800663|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "76dfb0e03485911d", "measure_id": "201800663", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support academic excellence, retain and recruit quality teachers and support staff, offer student enrichment in the arts focusing on music, enhance science with hands-on lessons in school gardens, and provide local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Soquel Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing the levy of a parcel tax for six years at a rate of $96 per year raising approximately $990,000 with an exemption for seniors and with annual citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8729, "no_votes": 4445, "total_votes": 13174, "percent_yes": 66.25929861849097, "percent_no": 33.74070138150903, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.180656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.610121", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support academic excellence, retain and recruit quality teachers and support staff, offer student enrichment in the arts focusing on music, enhance science with hands-on lessons in school gardens, and provide local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Soquel Union Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing the levy of a parcel tax for six years at a rate of $96 per year raising approximately $990,000 with an exemption for seniors and with annual citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4018, "fingerprint": "2018|201800091|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800091|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "26ff119d6df982fc", "measure_id": "201800091", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To continue funding 9-1-1 emergency response, paramedic, sheriff, fire, emergency preparedness, local street repairs, mental health services, homelessness programs, parks, economic development and other general county services, shall the County of Santa Cruz be authorized to increase by ordinance the sales tax on retail transactions in the unincorporated area of the County by one-half cent for twelve years, providing approximately $5,750,000 annually, subject to annual audits and independent citizens oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75810, "no_votes": 39309, "total_votes": 115119, "percent_yes": 65.85359497563391, "percent_no": 34.14640502436609, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.175403", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.607160", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding 9-1-1 emergency response, paramedic, sheriff, fire, emergency preparedness, local street repairs, mental health services, homelessness programs, parks, economic development and other general county services, shall the County of Santa Cruz be authorized to increase by ordinance the sales tax on retail transactions in the unincorporated area of the County by one-half cent for twelve years, providing approximately $5,750,000 annually, subject to annual audits and independent citizens oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4019, "fingerprint": "2018|201800092|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800092|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ec2c02ece3bfcf76", "measure_id": "201800092", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide affordable local housing for working families and vulnerable populations including veterans, seniors, low- and moderate-income households, persons with disabilities, homeless individuals and families; and supportive housing for individuals suffering from mental health illnesses or substance use disorders; shall the County of Santa Cruz issue up to $140,000,000 in general obligation bonds, with an estimated levy of $16.77 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $8,600,000 annually through maturity, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64298, "no_votes": 51783, "total_votes": 116081, "percent_yes": 55.39063240323567, "percent_no": 44.60936759676433, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.175743", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.607345", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide affordable local housing for working families and vulnerable populations including veterans, seniors, low- and moderate-income households, persons with disabilities, homeless individuals and families; and supportive housing for individuals suffering from mental health illnesses or substance use disorders; shall the County of Santa Cruz issue up to $140,000,000 in general obligation bonds, with an estimated levy of $16.77 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating approximately $8,600,000 annually through maturity, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4023, "fingerprint": "2018|201800443|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800443|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "8675d44a4c720ec5", "measure_id": "201800443", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect the quality of life in the City of Capitola and to fund essential City services such as sidewalks, streets, and emergency response, shall Capitola voters enact an ordinance establishing a tax of no more than 7% on cannabis businesses in the city, generating estimated revenue of up to $310,000 annually per cannabis business, to remain in effect until changed or ended by voters, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3683, "no_votes": 1178, "total_votes": 4861, "percent_yes": 75.76630322978811, "percent_no": 24.233696770211893, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.176913", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.608086", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of life in the City of Capitola and to fund essential City services such as sidewalks, streets, and emergency response, shall Capitola voters enact an ordinance establishing a tax of no more than 7% on cannabis businesses in the city, generating estimated revenue of up to $310,000 annually per cannabis business, to remain in effect until changed or ended by voters, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4024, "fingerprint": "2018|201800444|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800444|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "80087e9a5484c83f", "measure_id": "201800444", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help fund youth programs, protect parks, beaches and open space, and support local businesses, shall a special tax measure paid only by hotel and short-term rental guests be approved increasing transient occupancy taxes from 10% to 12% until ended by voters, providing approximately $310,000 annually, and allocating dedicated portions to youth and early childhood programs, and local business groups for marketing and community improvements, and the balance to fund core City functions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3642, "no_votes": 1192, "total_votes": 4834, "percent_yes": 75.34133223003724, "percent_no": 24.65866776996276, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.177181", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.608268", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help fund youth programs, protect parks, beaches and open space, and support local businesses, shall a special tax measure paid only by hotel and short-term rental guests be approved increasing transient occupancy taxes from 10% to 12% until ended by voters, providing approximately $310,000 annually, and allocating dedicated portions to youth and early childhood programs, and local business groups for marketing and community improvements, and the balance to fund core City functions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4025, "fingerprint": "2018|201800445|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800445|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "3c10528db8ce079c", "measure_id": "201800445", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to assure that the City of Capitola\u2019s finances are overseen by a trained and qualified individual, shall the office of City Treasurer be changed from elective to appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3000, "no_votes": 1622, "total_votes": 4622, "percent_yes": 64.90696668109044, "percent_no": 35.09303331890956, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.177598", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.608452", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to assure that the City of Capitola\u2019s finances are overseen by a trained and qualified individual, shall the office of City Treasurer be changed from elective to appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4026, "fingerprint": "2018|201800446|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800446|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a6ee8d88f06e1cb7", "measure_id": "201800446", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Capitola Municipal Code be amended to direct Capitola constituent departments to take all steps necessary to preserve and maintain the Capitola segment of the Santa Cruz Regional Transportation Commission\u2019s Rail Corridor and Trestle over Soquel Creek for bicyclists, pedestrians and other human powered transportation, and to prohibit expenditures to route bicyclists, pedestrians and other human powered transportation from the rail corridor to Capitola streets and sidewalks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2526, "no_votes": 2320, "total_votes": 4846, "percent_yes": 52.125464300453984, "percent_no": 47.874535699546016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.177955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.608637", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Capitola Municipal Code be amended to direct Capitola constituent departments to take all steps necessary to preserve and maintain the Capitola segment of the Santa Cruz Regional Transportation Commission\u2019s Rail Corridor and Trestle over Soquel Creek for bicyclists, pedestrians and other human powered transportation, and to prohibit expenditures to route bicyclists, pedestrians and other human powered transportation from the rail corridor to Capitola streets and sidewalks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4027, "fingerprint": "2018|201800447|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800447|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "fa1c605cc7080dcc", "measure_id": "201800447", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to enact rent control and just cause eviction regulations on residential rentals in the City of Santa Cruz, with exceptions under State Law, to be governed by a separately elected and autonomous rent board, with independent authority to set rents, fees, and penalties, and appoint an executive director, legal counsel and staff to oversee implementation, administration, and enforcement of the rent control and just cause eviction regulations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18611, "no_votes": 11609, "total_votes": 30220, "percent_yes": 61.58504301786896, "percent_no": 38.41495698213104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.178227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.608826", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to enact rent control and just cause eviction regulations on residential rentals in the City of Santa Cruz, with exceptions under State Law, to be governed by a separately elected and autonomous rent board, with independent authority to set rents, fees, and penalties, and appoint an executive director, legal counsel and staff to oversee implementation, administration, and enforcement of the rent control and just cause eviction regulations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4028, "fingerprint": "2018|201800448|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800448|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "86127ff126ac9b7b", "measure_id": "201800448", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Scotts Valley adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.24.030 of the Municipal Code raising the transient occupancy tax rate from 10% to 11%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4038, "no_votes": 1894, "total_votes": 5932, "percent_yes": 68.07147673634525, "percent_no": 31.928523263654753, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.178496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.609009", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Scotts Valley adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.24.030 of the Municipal Code raising the transient occupancy tax rate from 10% to 11%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4029, "fingerprint": "2018|201800449|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800449|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "71626ede06e20ba6", "measure_id": "201800449", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect the quality of life in Watsonville by supporting police, fire, emergency services, parks and recreation, economic development, job creation, and essential city services; shall the City of Watsonville be authorized to levy an additional one percent of Transient Occupancy Tax on people staying at lodging facilities in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8044, "no_votes": 2612, "total_votes": 10656, "percent_yes": 75.48798798798799, "percent_no": 24.512012012012008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.178762", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.609189", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of life in Watsonville by supporting police, fire, emergency services, parks and recreation, economic development, job creation, and essential city services; shall the City of Watsonville be authorized to levy an additional one percent of Transient Occupancy Tax on people staying at lodging facilities in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4032, "fingerprint": "2018|201800661|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800661|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a709157401a25a54", "measure_id": "201800661", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Mountain School with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; and modernize/reconstruct/improve outdated classrooms, school facilities and fields; shall Mountain Elementary School District issue $2,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $158,000 annually through 2048 for bonds from levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all funds for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 405, "no_votes": 153, "total_votes": 558, "percent_yes": 72.58064516129032, "percent_no": 27.41935483870968, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.180086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.609749", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Mountain School with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; and modernize/reconstruct/improve outdated classrooms, school facilities and fields; shall Mountain Elementary School District issue $2,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $158,000 annually through 2048 for bonds from levies of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries and all funds for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4030, "fingerprint": "2018|201800659|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800659|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "025398c684b8bf17", "measure_id": "201800659", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support academic excellence, maintain quality art and music programs, integrate modern technology into classrooms, retain high quality teachers and provide local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Happy Valley Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing the levy of a parcel tax for six years at a rate of $99 per year raising $61,000 annually with an exemption for seniors and with annual citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 467, "no_votes": 140, "total_votes": 607, "percent_yes": 76.93574958813838, "percent_no": 23.06425041186162, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.179039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.609371", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support academic excellence, maintain quality art and music programs, integrate modern technology into classrooms, retain high quality teachers and provide local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Happy Valley Elementary School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing the levy of a parcel tax for six years at a rate of $99 per year raising $61,000 annually with an exemption for seniors and with annual citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4031, "fingerprint": "2018|201800660|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800660|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "cebc08acbeb98a81", "measure_id": "201800660", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair Loma Prieta School District\u2019s fire-damaged classrooms and community center, update fire alarms, water systems, electrical/heating and plumbing systems, meet health/safety codes, modernize aging classroom technology, acquire, repair, construct, equipment/sites with funding that cannot be taken by the State shall this Loma Prieta Joint Union School District measure be adopted to issue $10,600,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($670,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits and citizens oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 952, "no_votes": 514, "total_votes": 1466, "percent_yes": 64.93860845839018, "percent_no": 35.06139154160982, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.179471", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.609561", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair Loma Prieta School District\u2019s fire-damaged classrooms and community center, update fire alarms, water systems, electrical/heating and plumbing systems, meet health/safety codes, modernize aging classroom technology, acquire, repair, construct, equipment/sites with funding that cannot be taken by the State shall this Loma Prieta Joint Union School District measure be adopted to issue $10,600,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($670,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits and citizens oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4020, "fingerprint": "2018|201800440|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800440|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "5cdc58d4474cabd7", "measure_id": "201800440", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect Santa Cruz\u2019s quality of life by maintaining: police community and neighborhood services and crime prevention; homeless and treatment services; funding for local non-profits providing children/senior/working family services; City programs for children/at-risk youth; support for parks/beaches/open spaces; fire prevention programs and other essential city services, shall the City of Santa Cruz enact a permanent \u00bc percent sales tax to provide about $3 million annually for use in our local community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12134, "no_votes": 4733, "total_votes": 16867, "percent_yes": 71.93928973735697, "percent_no": 28.060710262643028, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.176097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.607534", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect Santa Cruz\u2019s quality of life by maintaining: police community and neighborhood services and crime prevention; homeless and treatment services; funding for local non-profits providing children/senior/working family services; City programs for children/at-risk youth; support for parks/beaches/open spaces; fire prevention programs and other essential city services, shall the City of Santa Cruz enact a permanent \u00bc percent sales tax to provide about $3 million annually for use in our local community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4021, "fingerprint": "2018|201800441|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800441|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "c3ab6c2da4a63ad1", "measure_id": "201800441", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "With cultivation, possession and use of recreational marijuana made legal in 2016 by California voters, shall the Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended to repeal Measure K, a 2006 ballot measure that requires Santa Cruz police officers and other law enforcement officers in the City of Santa Cruz to make enforcement of laws pertaining to the distribution, sale, cultivation or use of marijuana by adults their lowest law enforcement priority?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11591, "no_votes": 4406, "total_votes": 15997, "percent_yes": 72.45733575045321, "percent_no": 27.54266424954679, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.176372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.607725", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "With cultivation, possession and use of recreational marijuana made legal in 2016 by California voters, shall the Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended to repeal Measure K, a 2006 ballot measure that requires Santa Cruz police officers and other law enforcement officers in the City of Santa Cruz to make enforcement of laws pertaining to the distribution, sale, cultivation or use of marijuana by adults their lowest law enforcement priority?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4022, "fingerprint": "2018|201800442|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800442|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "7546bde8f87b6091", "measure_id": "201800442", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted expressing the Santa Cruz community\u2019s opposition to the proposed enrollment growth at the University of California, Santa Cruz?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12606, "no_votes": 3783, "total_votes": 16389, "percent_yes": 76.91744462749405, "percent_no": 23.08255537250595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.176646", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.607905", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted expressing the Santa Cruz community\u2019s opposition to the proposed enrollment growth at the University of California, Santa Cruz?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4035, "fingerprint": "2018|201800664|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800664|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "4bcef3b7d543bc4b", "measure_id": "201800664", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade educational facilities/technology to prepare students/veterans for 21st-century jobs, university transfer; update science, engineering, math classrooms, labs for nursing/healthcare careers; acquire, construct, repair, classrooms, facilities, sites, equipment; shall West Valley-Mission Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $698,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $13/$100,000 assessed value averaging $39,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with oversight, audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/ pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1351, "no_votes": 1154, "total_votes": 2505, "percent_yes": 53.93213572854292, "percent_no": 46.06786427145708, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.180936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.610312", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade educational facilities/technology to prepare students/veterans for 21st-century jobs, university transfer; update science, engineering, math classrooms, labs for nursing/healthcare careers; acquire, construct, repair, classrooms, facilities, sites, equipment; shall West Valley-Mission Community College District\u2019s measure authorizing $698,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $13/$100,000 assessed value averaging $39,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be approved, with oversight, audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/ pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4037, "fingerprint": "2018|201800665|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800665|SHASTA", "content_hash": "8dbb58c06469b319", "measure_id": "201800665", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Redding School District issue $28,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, raising an estimated $420,000 - $2,700,000 annually through approximately 2052 at a projected rate of $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5523, "no_votes": 3223, "total_votes": 8746, "percent_yes": 63.14886805396753, "percent_no": 36.85113194603247, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.181615", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.610695", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Redding School District issue $28,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, raising an estimated $420,000 - $2,700,000 annually through approximately 2052 at a projected rate of $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4036, "fingerprint": "2018|201800450|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800450|SHASTA", "content_hash": "3d4514abb6edaad1", "measure_id": "201800450", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Redding adopt a business tax on cannabis cultivation businesses up to $25 per square foot of cultivation area and on cannabis manufacturing, processing, laboratory testing, delivery, storage, distribution, and retail sale up to 10% of gross receipts, to enhance and maintain vital public safety services, reduce crime, and protect other general services with all funds to be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, generating approximately $750,000 annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24995, "no_votes": 8750, "total_votes": 33745, "percent_yes": 74.07023262705586, "percent_no": 25.92976737294414, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.181304", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.610508", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Redding adopt a business tax on cannabis cultivation businesses up to $25 per square foot of cultivation area and on cannabis manufacturing, processing, laboratory testing, delivery, storage, distribution, and retail sale up to 10% of gross receipts, to enhance and maintain vital public safety services, reduce crime, and protect other general services with all funds to be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, generating approximately $750,000 annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4038, "fingerprint": "2018|201800666|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800666|SHASTA", "content_hash": "41bd784a9e2f09ad", "measure_id": "201800666", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational quality; upgrade/renovate/construct classrooms, restrooms and facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; upgrade outdated electrical and plumbing/sewer systems; make health/safety/handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Enterprise Elementary School District issue $26,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy an estimated 3 cents/$100 of assessed value, raising an average $1,540,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for administrative salaries, with funding that cannot be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6181, "no_votes": 3727, "total_votes": 9908, "percent_yes": 62.38393217601937, "percent_no": 37.61606782398063, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.181889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.610884", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational quality; upgrade/renovate/construct classrooms, restrooms and facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; upgrade outdated electrical and plumbing/sewer systems; make health/safety/handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Enterprise Elementary School District issue $26,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy an estimated 3 cents/$100 of assessed value, raising an average $1,540,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for administrative salaries, with funding that cannot be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4039, "fingerprint": "2018|201800093|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800093|SIERRA", "content_hash": "6ff86b07efb8750d", "measure_id": "201800093", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall a measure imposing a prohibition on commercial marijuana cultivation, commercial marijuana processing, and marijuana dispensaries within Sierra County be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 801, "no_votes": 708, "total_votes": 1509, "percent_yes": 53.08151093439364, "percent_no": 46.91848906560636, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.182157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.611079", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall a measure imposing a prohibition on commercial marijuana cultivation, commercial marijuana processing, and marijuana dispensaries within Sierra County be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4040, "fingerprint": "2018|201800451|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800451|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "55e152960cad8b65", "measure_id": "201800451", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to impose a marijuana business tax of up to 10% of gross receipts and $10 to $26 per square foot of grow area, to raise approximately $50,000 a year until voters decide otherwise, to fund such City purposes as police and fire services and street maintenance be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 278, "no_votes": 116, "total_votes": 394, "percent_yes": 70.55837563451777, "percent_no": 29.441624365482227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.182495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.611259", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to impose a marijuana business tax of up to 10% of gross receipts and $10 to $26 per square foot of grow area, to raise approximately $50,000 a year until voters decide otherwise, to fund such City purposes as police and fire services and street maintenance be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4042, "fingerprint": "2018|201800453|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800453|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201800453", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 127, "no_votes": 107, "total_votes": 234, "percent_yes": 54.27350427350427, "percent_no": 45.72649572649573, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.183030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.611806", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4043, "fingerprint": "2018|201800454|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800454|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "201800454", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 129, "no_votes": 106, "total_votes": 235, "percent_yes": 54.8936170212766, "percent_no": 45.1063829787234, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.183295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.612020", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4044, "fingerprint": "2018|201800455|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800455|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "1b33a0d5d53dd445", "measure_id": "201800455", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a Cannabis Industry Tax on the privilege of commercially cultivating, manufacturing, processing, storing, laboratory testing, labeling, packaging, distributing, or sale of cannabis and cannabis products which will raise approximately $130,000 annually to be used for general City services and which will remain in effect until amended or repealed by the City Council of the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1107, "no_votes": 422, "total_votes": 1529, "percent_yes": 72.4002616088947, "percent_no": 27.599738391105305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.183563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.612211", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a Cannabis Industry Tax on the privilege of commercially cultivating, manufacturing, processing, storing, laboratory testing, labeling, packaging, distributing, or sale of cannabis and cannabis products which will raise approximately $130,000 annually to be used for general City services and which will remain in effect until amended or repealed by the City Council of the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4041, "fingerprint": "2018|201800452|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800452|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "d1ada6233f95dfd9", "measure_id": "201800452", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for general City services, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a cannabis industry tax at a rate not to exceed up to $3.50 per dry-weight ounce of cannabis flower, cannabis leaves, fresh cannabis plant, and up to 10% of gross receipts per quarter for other commercial Cannabis businesses and which may raise an amount which is difficult to estimate but may be approximately $20,000 to $40,000 per year.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 482, "no_votes": 184, "total_votes": 666, "percent_yes": 72.37237237237237, "percent_no": 27.627627627627632, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.182763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.611536", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for general City services, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a cannabis industry tax at a rate not to exceed up to $3.50 per dry-weight ounce of cannabis flower, cannabis leaves, fresh cannabis plant, and up to 10% of gross receipts per quarter for other commercial Cannabis businesses and which may raise an amount which is difficult to estimate but may be approximately $20,000 to $40,000 per year.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4048, "fingerprint": "2018|201800458|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800458|SOLANO", "content_hash": "b9af31fc71ab9868", "measure_id": "201800458", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Californians voted to impose taxes on the cannabis industry. Shall the measure, imposing a local general tax on cannabis businesses at rates not exceeding 15% of gross receipts and $25 per square foot of space used for commercial cannabis activities (annually adjusted by CPI) to pay for general City services, including essential public safety, street maintenance and other City services for Suisun City residents, estimated to generate $2,000,000 annually until repealed by voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6121, "no_votes": 2167, "total_votes": 8288, "percent_yes": 73.85376447876449, "percent_no": 26.14623552123551, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.184748", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.612976", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Californians voted to impose taxes on the cannabis industry. Shall the measure, imposing a local general tax on cannabis businesses at rates not exceeding 15% of gross receipts and $25 per square foot of space used for commercial cannabis activities (annually adjusted by CPI) to pay for general City services, including essential public safety, street maintenance and other City services for Suisun City residents, estimated to generate $2,000,000 annually until repealed by voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4046, "fingerprint": "2018|201800456|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800456|SOLANO", "content_hash": "290f3cc7d86c0740", "measure_id": "201800456", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure establishing a City of Benicia cannabis business tax at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for commercial cannabis cultivation (adjustable for inflation) and 6% of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses, and estimated to generate approximately $1.46 million annually in tax revenue until ended by voters, to be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including police, fire and emergency services, parks, recreation, and street maintenance, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10125, "no_votes": 3147, "total_votes": 13272, "percent_yes": 76.28842676311031, "percent_no": 23.71157323688969, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.184179", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.612590", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure establishing a City of Benicia cannabis business tax at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for commercial cannabis cultivation (adjustable for inflation) and 6% of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses, and estimated to generate approximately $1.46 million annually in tax revenue until ended by voters, to be spent for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including police, fire and emergency services, parks, recreation, and street maintenance, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4049, "fingerprint": "2018|201800667|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800667|SOLANO", "content_hash": "2a8f1cfeadf725f9", "measure_id": "201800667", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update classrooms, science/Innovation labs, and facilities to meet current academic standards, improve accessibility for students, upgrade school safety/security, keep schools well-maintained, and modernize classroom learning technology, shall Davis Joint Unified School District Issue $150,900,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, raising $11,000,000 on average annually to repay bonds while outstanding, at an estimated rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 27, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.185013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.613174", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update classrooms, science/Innovation labs, and facilities to meet current academic standards, improve accessibility for students, upgrade school safety/security, keep schools well-maintained, and modernize classroom learning technology, shall Davis Joint Unified School District Issue $150,900,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, raising $11,000,000 on average annually to repay bonds while outstanding, at an estimated rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4047, "fingerprint": "2018|201800457|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800457|SOLANO", "content_hash": "503d9945722b9dfa", "measure_id": "201800457", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure imposing a one-half percent (0.5%) sales tax in the City of Dixon, limited to a ten-year term, generating an estimated $1,400,000 annually, and limiting the expenditure of such funds to street maintenance and roadway improvements, such as the Parkway Boulevard overcrossing be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4044, "no_votes": 2439, "total_votes": 6483, "percent_yes": 62.378528459046734, "percent_no": 37.621471540953266, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.184448", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.612786", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure imposing a one-half percent (0.5%) sales tax in the City of Dixon, limited to a ten-year term, generating an estimated $1,400,000 annually, and limiting the expenditure of such funds to street maintenance and roadway improvements, such as the Parkway Boulevard overcrossing be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4051, "fingerprint": "2018|201800669|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800669|SOLANO", "content_hash": "b435183468378283", "measure_id": "201800669", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; shall Winters Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 of bonds, raising on average $1,100,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 246, "no_votes": 199, "total_votes": 445, "percent_yes": 55.28089887640449, "percent_no": 44.71910112359551, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.185621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.613572", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; shall Winters Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 of bonds, raising on average $1,100,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4045, "fingerprint": "2018|201800094|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800094|SOLANO", "content_hash": "effc61d4366a2521", "measure_id": "201800094", "measure_letter": "RM3", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56334, "no_votes": 24182, "total_votes": 80516, "percent_yes": 69.96621789457997, "percent_no": 30.03378210542003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.183829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.612402", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4050, "fingerprint": "2018|201800668|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800668|SOLANO", "content_hash": "cba298ca1cf0dc81", "measure_id": "201800668", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve classroom education, safety, and college/career preparation by repairing/updating classrooms, roofs, and bathrooms; updating science/technology labs; improving security/ disability access; acquiring, constructing, and modernizing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Vallejo City Unified School District issue $194,000,000 of bonds raising approximately $10 million annually on average for 33 years at a projected rate of 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, at legal interest rates with citizen oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25744, "no_votes": 11179, "total_votes": 36923, "percent_yes": 69.7234785905804, "percent_no": 30.2765214094196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.185288", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.613367", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve classroom education, safety, and college/career preparation by repairing/updating classrooms, roofs, and bathrooms; updating science/technology labs; improving security/ disability access; acquiring, constructing, and modernizing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Vallejo City Unified School District issue $194,000,000 of bonds raising approximately $10 million annually on average for 33 years at a projected rate of 6\u00a2 per $100 of assessed value, at legal interest rates with citizen oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4062, "fingerprint": "2018|201800672|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800672|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e0d257b4fd6ce84e", "measure_id": "201800672", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that can not be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; and modernize/renovate/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall West Sonoma County Union High School District is sue $91,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $4.9 million annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11551, "no_votes": 6310, "total_votes": 17861, "percent_yes": 64.67163092771962, "percent_no": 35.32836907228038, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.188708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.615772", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that can not be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; and modernize/renovate/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall West Sonoma County Union High School District is sue $91,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $4.9 million annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4060, "fingerprint": "2018|201800670|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800670|SONOMA", "content_hash": "6c34539c8bae1bfd", "measure_id": "201800670", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; improve classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; and construct a multi-purpose room for school and community use; shall Alexander Valley Union School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $376,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 2.82 cents per $100 assessed value, with No money for salaries and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 201, "no_votes": 131, "total_votes": 332, "percent_yes": 60.54216867469879, "percent_no": 39.45783132530121, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.188107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.615376", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; improve classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; and construct a multi-purpose room for school and community use; shall Alexander Valley Union School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $376,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 2.82 cents per $100 assessed value, with No money for salaries and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4061, "fingerprint": "2018|201800671|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800671|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ab54b02994208c1c", "measure_id": "201800671", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve facilities at Harmony and Salmon Creek Schools; repair/replace leaky roofs; improve energy efficiency; and construct/renovate/modernize class rooms, restrooms and school facilities under an environmental sustainability facilities plan; shall Harmony Union School District issue $9,600,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with estimated repayment amounts averaging $590,000 raised annually through 2051, projected tax rates of 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, No money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1228, "no_votes": 643, "total_votes": 1871, "percent_yes": 65.63335114911811, "percent_no": 34.36664885088189, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.188405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.615567", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve facilities at Harmony and Salmon Creek Schools; repair/replace leaky roofs; improve energy efficiency; and construct/renovate/modernize class rooms, restrooms and school facilities under an environmental sustainability facilities plan; shall Harmony Union School District issue $9,600,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with estimated repayment amounts averaging $590,000 raised annually through 2051, projected tax rates of 3\u00a2 per $100 of assessed valuation, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, No money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4063, "fingerprint": "2018|201800673|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800673|SONOMA", "content_hash": "8a5438a1b41ba293", "measure_id": "201800673", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; and modernize, construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Cloverdale Unified School District issue $46,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,700,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2599, "no_votes": 1702, "total_votes": 4301, "percent_yes": 60.42780748663101, "percent_no": 39.57219251336899, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.188982", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.615976", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; and modernize, construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Cloverdale Unified School District issue $46,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,700,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4067, "fingerprint": "2018|201800677|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800677|SONOMA", "content_hash": "95bb9f73d10bce44", "measure_id": "201800677", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize outdated classrooms and buildings, replace aging portables, upgrade infra structure, construct new educational facilities, and improve access to technology, shall Shoreline Unified School District issue $19.5 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with projected tax rates of 3.9\u00a2 per $100 of taxable value while bonds are outstanding (generating on average approximately $1.45 million annually for issued bonds), and requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and all funds spent to benefit Shoreline students and schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 667, "no_votes": 415, "total_votes": 1082, "percent_yes": 61.64510166358596, "percent_no": 38.35489833641404, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.190126", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.616780", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize outdated classrooms and buildings, replace aging portables, upgrade infra structure, construct new educational facilities, and improve access to technology, shall Shoreline Unified School District issue $19.5 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with projected tax rates of 3.9\u00a2 per $100 of taxable value while bonds are outstanding (generating on average approximately $1.45 million annually for issued bonds), and requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and all funds spent to benefit Shoreline students and schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4064, "fingerprint": "2018|201800674|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800674|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9a8beb90ed6a3a9e", "measure_id": "201800674", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; replace outdated heating and ventilation systems; repair or replace leaky roofs; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Monte Rio Union Elementary School District issue $3,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on\r\naverage $234,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 707, "no_votes": 287, "total_votes": 994, "percent_yes": 71.12676056338029, "percent_no": 28.873239436619713, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.189255", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.616178", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; replace outdated heating and ventilation systems; repair or replace leaky roofs; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Monte Rio Union Elementary School District issue $3,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on\r\naverage $234,000 annually for issued bonds through maturity from levies of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4065, "fingerprint": "2018|201800675|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800675|SONOMA", "content_hash": "023b7b5802d2d1b8", "measure_id": "201800675", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Oak Grove Union School District issue $9,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average $556,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with No money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1540, "no_votes": 1024, "total_votes": 2564, "percent_yes": 60.06240249609984, "percent_no": 39.93759750390016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.189526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.616380", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Oak Grove Union School District issue $9,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average $556,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with No money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4066, "fingerprint": "2018|201800676|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800676|SONOMA", "content_hash": "499b68c846d4759c", "measure_id": "201800676", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair and replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall Old Adobe Union School District issue $38,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,200,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizen\u2019s oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7028, "no_votes": 3937, "total_votes": 10965, "percent_yes": 64.09484724122207, "percent_no": 35.90515275877793, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.189825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.616580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair and replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall Old Adobe Union School District issue $38,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating on average $2,200,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizen\u2019s oversight, no money for salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4053, "fingerprint": "2018|201800096|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800096|SONOMA", "content_hash": "1bda7d69799e4e0a", "measure_id": "201800096", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve and protect Sonoma County\u2019s regional and neighborhood parks; safeguard water supplies, streams, rivers; reduce future wildfire risk; preserve fish and wildlife habitat; conserve natural areas for future generations; support community health and expand walking, hiking, and biking trails; shall Sonoma County establish a one-eighth cent special transaction and use tax (sales tax) countywide for a ten-year period, providing approximately $11.5 million annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 148130, "no_votes": 55852, "total_votes": 203982, "percent_yes": 72.61915267033365, "percent_no": 27.380847329666352, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.186158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.613959", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve and protect Sonoma County\u2019s regional and neighborhood parks; safeguard water supplies, streams, rivers; reduce future wildfire risk; preserve fish and wildlife habitat; conserve natural areas for future generations; support community health and expand walking, hiking, and biking trails; shall Sonoma County establish a one-eighth cent special transaction and use tax (sales tax) countywide for a ten-year period, providing approximately $11.5 million annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4055, "fingerprint": "2018|201800460|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800460|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c8b5eca3614430a0", "measure_id": "201800460", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To aid recovery and provide affordable housing for low- and middle-income families, veterans, seniors, disabled, and other vulnerable populations, provide supportive housing for the homeless; and help low- and middle-income households purchase homes in their communities, shall the City of Santa Rosa\u2019s measure to issue $124 million in bonds, levying approximately $8.6 million annually at approximately $29 per $100,000 of assessed value through final maturity, with oversight and audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40248, "no_votes": 25018, "total_votes": 65266, "percent_yes": 61.66763705451537, "percent_no": 38.33236294548463, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.186697", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.614351", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To aid recovery and provide affordable housing for low- and middle-income families, veterans, seniors, disabled, and other vulnerable populations, provide supportive housing for the homeless; and help low- and middle-income households purchase homes in their communities, shall the City of Santa Rosa\u2019s measure to issue $124 million in bonds, levying approximately $8.6 million annually at approximately $29 per $100,000 of assessed value through final maturity, with oversight and audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4056, "fingerprint": "2018|201800461|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800461|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4bebf2c4bcf90d62", "measure_id": "201800461", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide temporary funding to recover from the October 2017 fires and preserve city services including maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response times and neighborhood police patrols; repairing potholes, streets and sidewalks; rebuilding firefighting infrastructure and fire prevention; shall the City of Santa Rosa enact a one-quarter cent sales tax for six years only, generating approximately $9 million annually, for unrestricted general fund purposes, subject to annual audits, with all revenue staying in Santa Rosa?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40348, "no_votes": 25148, "total_votes": 65496, "percent_yes": 61.6037620618053, "percent_no": 38.3962379381947, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.186962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.614555", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide temporary funding to recover from the October 2017 fires and preserve city services including maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response times and neighborhood police patrols; repairing potholes, streets and sidewalks; rebuilding firefighting infrastructure and fire prevention; shall the City of Santa Rosa enact a one-quarter cent sales tax for six years only, generating approximately $9 million annually, for unrestricted general fund purposes, subject to annual audits, with all revenue staying in Santa Rosa?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4054, "fingerprint": "2018|201800459|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800459|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a0233083be72b98a", "measure_id": "201800459", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Healdsburg amend its current Growth Management Ordinance to allow for the construction of an average of 50 additional multifamily income-restricted rental units per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2918, "no_votes": 2315, "total_votes": 5233, "percent_yes": 55.76151347219568, "percent_no": 44.23848652780432, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.186424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.614159", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Healdsburg amend its current Growth Management Ordinance to allow for the construction of an average of 50 additional multifamily income-restricted rental units per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4057, "fingerprint": "2018|201800462|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800462|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ffa4246a05bf78aa", "measure_id": "201800462", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to extend, until repealed by the voters, the previously approved City of Sebastopol\u2019s 0.5% increase in transactions and use tax, which annually raises $1,400,000, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2778, "no_votes": 1298, "total_votes": 4076, "percent_yes": 68.15505397448479, "percent_no": 31.844946025515213, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.187287", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.614763", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to extend, until repealed by the voters, the previously approved City of Sebastopol\u2019s 0.5% increase in transactions and use tax, which annually raises $1,400,000, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4058, "fingerprint": "2018|201800463|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800463|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4aabfeecadb1079d", "measure_id": "201800463", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to clarify and increase the City of Sebastopol\u2019s transient occupancy tax by 2%, until repealed by the voters, which is estimated to annually raise $617,000, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2903, "no_votes": 1161, "total_votes": 4064, "percent_yes": 71.43208661417323, "percent_no": 28.56791338582677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.187558", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.614968", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to clarify and increase the City of Sebastopol\u2019s transient occupancy tax by 2%, until repealed by the voters, which is estimated to annually raise $617,000, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4052, "fingerprint": "2018|201800095|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800095|SONOMA", "content_hash": "effc61d4366a2521", "measure_id": "201800095", "measure_letter": "RM3", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 67006, "no_votes": 58556, "total_votes": 125562, "percent_yes": 53.36487153756709, "percent_no": 46.63512846243291, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.185888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.613771", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4059, "fingerprint": "2018|201800464|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800464|SONOMA", "content_hash": "5db7d13ab86ed79c", "measure_id": "201800464", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for infrastructure and general City services including, but not limited to, police, fire, emergency preparedness, streets, parks, open space, and recreation, plus affordable/workforce housing shall City of Sonoma increase the ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) rate by 2% on January 1, 2019, and authorize an additional 1% in crease by January 1, 2024 (estimated $1,125,000 annually all funds used locally), and increase the City\u2019s appropriations limit for Fiscal Years 2018/19-2021/22 by the amount of increased tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4452, "no_votes": 1119, "total_votes": 5571, "percent_yes": 79.91383952611739, "percent_no": 20.086160473882614, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.187840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.615167", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for infrastructure and general City services including, but not limited to, police, fire, emergency preparedness, streets, parks, open space, and recreation, plus affordable/workforce housing shall City of Sonoma increase the ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) rate by 2% on January 1, 2019, and authorize an additional 1% in crease by January 1, 2024 (estimated $1,125,000 annually all funds used locally), and increase the City\u2019s appropriations limit for Fiscal Years 2018/19-2021/22 by the amount of increased tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4079, "fingerprint": "2018|201800682|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800682|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "994295c26c15903e", "measure_id": "201800682", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing current tax rates, shall Salida Union School District improve campus security and student safety by constructing secure school entrances, exits and fencing; renovate classrooms and schools; repair leaky plumbing; and replace and upgrade electrical wiring to meet current fire safety codes by issuing $2.5 million in bonds with legal rates, an average tax levy of $0.005 per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds are outstanding (averaging $200,000/year), annual audits and independent taxpayer oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3992, "no_votes": 1879, "total_votes": 5871, "percent_yes": 67.99523079543519, "percent_no": 32.00476920456481, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.193545", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.619221", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing current tax rates, shall Salida Union School District improve campus security and student safety by constructing secure school entrances, exits and fencing; renovate classrooms and schools; repair leaky plumbing; and replace and upgrade electrical wiring to meet current fire safety codes by issuing $2.5 million in bonds with legal rates, an average tax levy of $0.005 per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds are outstanding (averaging $200,000/year), annual audits and independent taxpayer oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4074, "fingerprint": "2018|201800471|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800471|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "2d86f584a68381b2", "measure_id": "201800471", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance authorizing the City Council of the City of Riverbank to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to ten percent (10%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses and dispensaries, to help fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4481, "no_votes": 1984, "total_votes": 6465, "percent_yes": 69.31167826759474, "percent_no": 30.688321732405257, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.192120", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.618233", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance authorizing the City Council of the City of Riverbank to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to ten percent (10%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses and dispensaries, to help fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4072, "fingerprint": "2018|201800469|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800469|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "cb9ccb3e72234e6b", "measure_id": "201800469", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance authorizing the City Council of the City of Oakdale to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses and dispensaries, to help fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5242, "no_votes": 2280, "total_votes": 7522, "percent_yes": 69.68891252326509, "percent_no": 30.31108747673491, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.191590", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.617848", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance authorizing the City Council of the City of Oakdale to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses and dispensaries, to help fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4076, "fingerprint": "2018|201800679|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800679|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "6d8af397811b3199", "measure_id": "201800679", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair leaking roofs; improve fire, emergency, security camera systems; provide accessibility for students with disabilities; update cafeterias, plumbing, HVAC and electrical systems, shall Modesto City Elementary School District issue $74 million in bonds at legal interest rates, collecting about $3.7 million annually with rates approximately $28 per $100,000 assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20541, "no_votes": 7840, "total_votes": 28381, "percent_yes": 72.37588527536028, "percent_no": 27.624114724639725, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.192685", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.618637", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair leaking roofs; improve fire, emergency, security camera systems; provide accessibility for students with disabilities; update cafeterias, plumbing, HVAC and electrical systems, shall Modesto City Elementary School District issue $74 million in bonds at legal interest rates, collecting about $3.7 million annually with rates approximately $28 per $100,000 assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4077, "fingerprint": "2018|201800680|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800680|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "af3e8db84be36eb7", "measure_id": "201800680", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update classrooms/science labs to support quality instruction in math/science/reading/writing; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; equip classrooms with technology preparing students for 21st\u00adCentury jobs, shall Modesto City Elementary School District issue $57 million in bonds at legal interest rates, collecting about $2.85 million annually with rates approximately $22 per $100,000 assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all funds local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19678, "no_votes": 8611, "total_votes": 28289, "percent_yes": 69.56060659620347, "percent_no": 30.43939340379653, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.192984", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.618830", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update classrooms/science labs to support quality instruction in math/science/reading/writing; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; equip classrooms with technology preparing students for 21st\u00adCentury jobs, shall Modesto City Elementary School District issue $57 million in bonds at legal interest rates, collecting about $2.85 million annually with rates approximately $22 per $100,000 assessed valuation while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators, all funds local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4070, "fingerprint": "2018|201800467|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800467|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "04bf20277ed8d03d", "measure_id": "201800467", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase voter participation and to conform with State law, shall the City of Modesto Charter be \r\namended to (1) hold future Modesto City Schools Board of Education elections in November of even-numbered years to coincide with State/Federal elections, and; (2) allow for a one-time, one-year extension of the terms of current Board of Education members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54803, "no_votes": 19555, "total_votes": 74358, "percent_yes": 73.70155195137039, "percent_no": 26.29844804862961, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.191003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.617460", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase voter participation and to conform with State law, shall the City of Modesto Charter be \r\namended to (1) hold future Modesto City Schools Board of Education elections in November of even-numbered years to coincide with State/Federal elections, and; (2) allow for a one-time, one-year extension of the terms of current Board of Education members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4078, "fingerprint": "2018|201800681|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800681|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "e3934824d972c953", "measure_id": "201800681", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing current tax rates, shall Riverbank Unified School District improve campus security and student safety; renovate, construct, equip, repair and improve classrooms and school facilities; repair/ replace leaky roofs; and replace and upgrade electrical wiring to meet current fire safety codes by issuing $19.1 million in bonds with legal rates, an average tax levy of 5.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds are outstanding (averaging $1.1 million/year), annual audits, and independent taxpayer oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2388, "no_votes": 1353, "total_votes": 3741, "percent_yes": 63.83319967923016, "percent_no": 36.16680032076984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.193250", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.619029", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing current tax rates, shall Riverbank Unified School District improve campus security and student safety; renovate, construct, equip, repair and improve classrooms and school facilities; repair/ replace leaky roofs; and replace and upgrade electrical wiring to meet current fire safety codes by issuing $19.1 million in bonds with legal rates, an average tax levy of 5.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation while the bonds are outstanding (averaging $1.1 million/year), annual audits, and independent taxpayer oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4075, "fingerprint": "2018|201800678|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800678|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "5a43c09fe55818f5", "measure_id": "201800678", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair Patterson\u2019s classrooms, construct classrooms for 21st Century learning/reduce overcrowding, make fire safety/security improvements, replace aging plumbing/sewer/electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall the measure be adopted to reauthorize the $33,852,058.10 Patterson Joint Unified School District bonds approved in 2008 as new bonds, at legal rates, levy on average 6 cents/$100 assessed value ($2,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with taxpayer oversight, audits, no increase in total authorized District debt?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1897, "no_votes": 1148, "total_votes": 3045, "percent_yes": 62.29885057471264, "percent_no": 37.70114942528736, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.192392", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.618430", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair Patterson\u2019s classrooms, construct classrooms for 21st Century learning/reduce overcrowding, make fire safety/security improvements, replace aging plumbing/sewer/electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall the measure be adopted to reauthorize the $33,852,058.10 Patterson Joint Unified School District bonds approved in 2008 as new bonds, at legal rates, levy on average 6 cents/$100 assessed value ($2,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with taxpayer oversight, audits, no increase in total authorized District debt?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4068, "fingerprint": "2018|201800465|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800465|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a63bf683dcf7d89a", "measure_id": "201800465", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance authorizing the City Council of the City of Ceres to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses and dispensaries, to help fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7354, "no_votes": 3735, "total_votes": 11089, "percent_yes": 66.31797276580394, "percent_no": 33.682027234196056, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.190393", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.617071", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance authorizing the City Council of the City of Ceres to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses and dispensaries, to help fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4069, "fingerprint": "2018|201800466|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800466|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "33cfa0e68ba59773", "measure_id": "201800466", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure making the office of the City Treasurer for the City of Ceres appointive, rather than elective, with the first appointment occurring upon the expiration of the term of the current City Treasurer, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6952, "no_votes": 3821, "total_votes": 10773, "percent_yes": 64.53169961941892, "percent_no": 35.468300380581084, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.190688", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.617267", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure making the office of the City Treasurer for the City of Ceres appointive, rather than elective, with the first appointment occurring upon the expiration of the term of the current City Treasurer, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4073, "fingerprint": "2018|201800470|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800470|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "0a8fcef3b97cfd3b", "measure_id": "201800470", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance authorizing the City Council of the City of Patterson to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses and dispensaries, to help fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3552, "no_votes": 1917, "total_votes": 5469, "percent_yes": 64.94788809654416, "percent_no": 35.05211190345584, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.191855", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.618041", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance authorizing the City Council of the City of Patterson to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses and dispensaries, to help fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4071, "fingerprint": "2018|201800468|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800468|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "84e0d92261c5395c", "measure_id": "201800468", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase voter participation in City of Modesto elections and to conform with state law, shall the City of Modesto Charter be amended to: ( 1) change the date for the City's future, regular elections to November of even-numbered years to coincide with State/Federal elections, and; (2) allow for a one time, one-year extension of the terms of City Council members and the Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45521, "no_votes": 16728, "total_votes": 62249, "percent_yes": 73.12727915307876, "percent_no": 26.87272084692124, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.191295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.617656", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase voter participation in City of Modesto elections and to conform with state law, shall the City of Modesto Charter be amended to: ( 1) change the date for the City's future, regular elections to November of even-numbered years to coincide with State/Federal elections, and; (2) allow for a one time, one-year extension of the terms of City Council members and the Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4083, "fingerprint": "2018|201800685|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800685|SUTTER", "content_hash": "80df1e8af2a6962c", "measure_id": "201800685", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Travis Barker be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117, "no_votes": 109, "total_votes": 226, "percent_yes": 51.76991150442478, "percent_no": 48.23008849557522, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-12-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.194683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.620013", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Travis Barker be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4084, "fingerprint": "2018|201800686|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800686|SUTTER", "content_hash": "0386cdedc1c41442", "measure_id": "201800686", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Carrie Peterson be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117, "no_votes": 111, "total_votes": 228, "percent_yes": 51.31578947368421, "percent_no": 48.68421052631579, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-12-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.194943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.620204", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Carrie Peterson be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4082, "fingerprint": "2018|201800684|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800684|SUTTER", "content_hash": "625542a8028688f8", "measure_id": "201800684", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To finance installation of a comprehensive HVAC system at Woodland High School and construction of a new practice gymnasium at Pioneer High School, shall the Woodland Joint Unified School District issue $20,200,000 of bonds with an estimated $4,448,000 in taxes raised annually on average for five years at average projected tax rates of 5.28 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16, "no_votes": 28, "total_votes": 44, "percent_yes": 36.36363636363636, "percent_no": 63.63636363636364, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.194419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.619820", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance installation of a comprehensive HVAC system at Woodland High School and construction of a new practice gymnasium at Pioneer High School, shall the Woodland Joint Unified School District issue $20,200,000 of bonds with an estimated $4,448,000 in taxes raised annually on average for five years at average projected tax rates of 5.28 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4081, "fingerprint": "2018|201800683|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800683|SUTTER", "content_hash": "89954de3b373c62b", "measure_id": "201800683", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct/renovate classrooms, restrooms/school facilities to improve the quality of education at Brittan Elementary School, build a gymnasium for school and community use; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites and equipment, shall this Brittan Elementary School District measure be adopted to issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy proximately 3 cents/$100 assessed value, generating approximately $260,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 699, "no_votes": 393, "total_votes": 1092, "percent_yes": 64.01098901098901, "percent_no": 35.98901098901099, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.194149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.619614", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct/renovate classrooms, restrooms/school facilities to improve the quality of education at Brittan Elementary School, build a gymnasium for school and community use; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites and equipment, shall this Brittan Elementary School District measure be adopted to issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy proximately 3 cents/$100 assessed value, generating approximately $260,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for salaries, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4080, "fingerprint": "2018|201800472|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800472|SUTTER", "content_hash": "e86d2a662ff2d2e0", "measure_id": "201800472", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on May 24, 2017 and extended on January 11, 2018 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Sutter ordering the annexation to the City of Yuba City of the territory described in that order and designated as the South Yuba City/Highway 99 Reorganization No. 337, be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 339, "no_votes": 768, "total_votes": 1107, "percent_yes": 30.62330623306233, "percent_no": 69.37669376693768, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.193837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.619422", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on May 24, 2017 and extended on January 11, 2018 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Sutter ordering the annexation to the City of Yuba City of the territory described in that order and designated as the South Yuba City/Highway 99 Reorganization No. 337, be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1286, "fingerprint": "2018|PROP 12|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|PROP 12|Statewide", "content_hash": "aa91cfa8772cebe5", "measure_id": "Proposition 12", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Expand Required Number of Square Feet for Farm Animal Production Initiative", "description": "The measure bans the sale of veal from calves, eggs from hens, and the confinement of pregnant pigs in areas below a specified number of square feet. The measure follows Proposition 2 from 2008 which banned the sale of the above if raised in a manner that did not allow the animals to move around freely. ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.7, "percent_no": 37.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Agriculture", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure establishes minimum space requirements for the confinement of cal...", "summary_text": "The measure establishes minimum space requirements for the confinement of calves raised for veal, egg-laying hens, and pregnant pigs, and bans the sale of veal, eggs, and pork from animals that do not meet these space standards. It expands upon California's 2008 Proposition 2 by setting specific square footage requirements rather than general freedom of movement standards.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Expand Required Number of Square Feet for Farm Animal Production Initiative", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2018/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Expand%20Required%20Number%20of%20Square%20Feet%20for%20Farm%20Ani%202018", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1284, "fingerprint": "2018|PROP 7|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|PROP 7|Statewide", "content_hash": "7f968abb1254b986", "measure_id": "Proposition 7", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Allowing Legislature to Enact Permanent Daylight Saving Time If Allowed by Federal Law Measure", "description": "The measure repeals Proposition 12 from 1949, which created daylight saving time in California. It would allow the legislature to establish permanent daylight saving time by a two-thirds vote if federal law is changed to allow it. ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.599999999999994, "percent_no": 40.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Legislative Referendum", "topic_primary": "Business & Commerce", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure repealed California's 1949 law establishing daylight saving time...", "summary_text": "This measure repealed California's 1949 law establishing daylight saving time and authorized the legislature to adopt permanent daylight saving time with a two-thirds vote if federal law permits such a change.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Allowing Legislature to Enact Permanent Daylight Saving Time If Allowed by Federal Law Measure", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2018/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Allowing%20Legislature%20to%20Enact%20Permanent%20Daylight%20S%202018", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1281, "fingerprint": "2018|PROP 6|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|PROP 6|Statewide", "content_hash": "8dde0dacaa20b03b", "measure_id": "Proposition 6", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Repeal of 2017 Gas Tax and Voter Approval of Future Gas Tax Increases Initiative", "description": "First, the measure repeals an increase in the fuel tax that was enacted in 2017, which included the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. Second, the measure requires a majority of voters to support any future fuel tax increase. ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.2, "percent_no": 56.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Elections-Initiative Process", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Repeal of 2017 Gas Tax and Voter Approval of Future Gas Tax Increases Initiative", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2018/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Repeal%20of%202017%20Gas%20Tax%20and%20Voter%20Approval%20of%20Futur%202018", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1279, "fingerprint": "2018|PROP 4|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|PROP 4|Statewide", "content_hash": "2e79bac16a2a5df7", "measure_id": "Proposition 4", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Bonds for Children's Hospitals Initiative", "description": "Authorizes $1.5 billion in bonds for the Children's Hospital Bond Fund Act, which is used to award grants to children's hospitals for construction, expansion, renovation, and equipment projects. ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.7, "percent_no": 37.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Bond Measures", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Bonds for Children's Hospitals Initiative", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2018/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Bonds%20for%20Children%27s%20Hospitals%20Initiative%202018", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1276, "fingerprint": "2018|PROP 2|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|PROP 2|Statewide", "content_hash": "94e6744512009583", "measure_id": "Proposition 2", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Application of Existing 1 Percent Tax on Incomes over One Million Dollars to Homelessness Prevention Bonds", "description": "Proposition 63, passed by voters in 2004, initiated a 1 percent tax on incomes over $1 million. This measure authorizes the state to use that revenue on $2 billion in revenue bonds for homelessness prevention housing for persons in need of mental health services. Proposition 63 originally required that its revenue be spent on mental health services, but this change is enough to require a vote of the people on the ballot (any change to a ballot measure requires this). ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.4, "percent_no": 36.6, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Legislative Referendum", "topic_primary": "Bond Measures", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorizes California to use revenue from the existing 1% tax on...", "summary_text": "This measure authorizes California to use revenue from the existing 1% tax on incomes over $1 million to issue $2 billion in bonds for homelessness prevention housing for people needing mental health services. The measure modifies Proposition 63 from 2004, which originally required the tax revenue to be spent directly on mental health services.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Application of Existing 1 Percent Tax on Incomes over One Million Dollars to Homelessness Prevention Bonds", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2018/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Application%20of%20Existing%201%20Percent%20Tax%20on%20Incomes%20o%202018", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1274, "fingerprint": "2018|PROP 11|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|PROP 11|Statewide", "content_hash": "dcf70ec7fdea58d7", "measure_id": "Proposition 11", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Ambulance Employees to Receive Paid On-Call Breaks and Additional Training Initiative", "description": "The measure allows ambulance providers to require ambulance workers to remain on-call during breaks, although it requires providers to pay at the regular rate during the breaks. Breaks cannot be required to be taken in the first or last hour of a shift, and if called onto duty, the break is made void. The measure also increases required training, particularly for active shooter scenarios and for multiple casualties, natural disasters, violence prevention, and mental health. Covers paramedics and EMTs. ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.599999999999994, "percent_no": 40.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Health", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows ambulance providers to require paramedics and EMTs to rem...", "summary_text": "This measure allows ambulance providers to require paramedics and EMTs to remain on-call during paid breaks, with restrictions on when breaks can be scheduled and provisions that void interrupted breaks. It also increases training requirements for emergency scenarios including active shooter situations, natural disasters, and mental health responses.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Ambulance Employees to Receive Paid On-Call Breaks and Additional Training Initiative", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2018/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Ambulance%20Employees%20to%20Receive%20Paid%20On-Call%20Breaks%202018", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1270, "fingerprint": "2018|PROP 10|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|PROP 10|Statewide", "content_hash": "075e18a2beb03d02", "measure_id": "Proposition 10", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Repeal of Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act and Allow Local Rent Control Initiative", "description": "The measure repeals the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act, passed by the legislature in 1995, that limits rent control in California. It specifies that cities cannot enact rent control on housing first occupied after February 1, 1995, and on housing units where the title is separate from connected units. Under the act, landlords are also able to increase rent to market rates when a tenant moves out. ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.6, "percent_no": 59.4, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Human Services", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have repealed the 1995 Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act, wh...", "summary_text": "The measure would have repealed the 1995 Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act, which currently prohibits cities from enacting rent control on housing first occupied after February 1, 1995, and on single-family homes and condos. Repealing the act would have allowed local governments to expand rent control to cover these previously exempted properties and potentially restrict landlords' ability to raise rents to market rates between tenancies.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Repeal of Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act and Allow Local Rent Control Initiative", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2018/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Repeal%20of%20Costa-Hawkins%20Rental%20Housing%20Act%20and%20All%202018", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1267, "fingerprint": "2018|PROP 8|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|PROP 8|Statewide", "content_hash": "5608c610420cbf12", "measure_id": "Proposition 8", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Limiting Dialysis Revenue and Requiring Refund to Patients or Insurers Initiative", "description": "Dialysis clinics have to refund to either the patient or insurer for all revenue above 115 percent of the cost of direct patient care. Costs include wages and benefits of staff, medical supplies, and the category of healthcare improvements such as staff training, patient education and counseling. ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.1, "percent_no": 59.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Business & Commerce", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required dialysis clinics to refund revenue exceeding...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required dialysis clinics to refund revenue exceeding 115% of direct patient care costs to patients or insurers. Direct patient care costs were defined to include staff wages and benefits, medical supplies, and healthcare improvements like training and patient education.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Limiting Dialysis Revenue and Requiring Refund to Patients or Insurers Initiative", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2018/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Limiting%20Dialysis%20Revenue%20and%20Requiring%20Refund%20to%20%202018", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1266, "fingerprint": "2018|PROP 5|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|PROP 5|Statewide", "content_hash": "99c84da3947d1dfb", "measure_id": "Proposition 5", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Decreasing Property Taxes for New Home Purchases by Homebuyers 55 and Older Amendment and Initiative", "description": "According to the California Legislative Analyst's Office of the California Legislature: the measure would decrease the amount of property taxes collected, which means that state funds would need to be raised to replace those dollars since state law requires schools to receive a minimum of funding each year. And often a home's market value (what it can be sold for) is lower than the amount that the property is assessed at for tax purposes (since most property value increase higher than the 2% set in law for assessing purposes). Thus, someone who buys a new home often finds they have to pay higher property taxes. Currently a homeowners 55 and older may purchase a home in the same county and transfer their existing assessed value to the new home. Counties also adminster the property tax. This measure would expand the ability of homeowners 55 and older to transfer their existing home value. They could do so across county lines and to more expensive homes. For more expensive homes at the market rate value, the assessed property tax value for the 55 and older homebuyer would be adjusted up from that of the previous home but would not equal the potential assessed value of the new more expensive home. If the market rate of the new home is less than the current home, the assessed value of the prior home would be adjusted downward. There are no limits to the number of times a person can move and use the measure's provisions. Estimated effects include a likely increase in home sales but a decrease in property tax revenue and thus an increase in state revenue for schools. ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.2, "percent_no": 59.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Legislative Referendum", "topic_primary": "Tax & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed homeowners 55 and older to transfer their exi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed homeowners 55 and older to transfer their existing property tax assessments to new homes across county lines and to more expensive properties, with no limit on frequency of transfers. The change would have reduced property tax revenue and required increased state funding to maintain mandated school funding levels.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Decreasing Property Taxes for New Home Purchases by Homebuyers 55 and Older Amendment and Initiative", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2018/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Decreasing%20Property%20Taxes%20for%20New%20Home%20Purchases%20b%202018", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1261, "fingerprint": "2018|PROP 3|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|PROP 3|Statewide", "content_hash": "10be7fb26256b2cc", "measure_id": "Proposition 3", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Water Infrastructure, Supply and Watershed Protection Bond Initiative", "description": "Authorizes $8.877 billion in bonds for water infrastructure, groundwater storage, surface water storage, dam repairs, and watershed protection including habitat restoration. The measure specifies specific amounts for various projects as to how the bonds would be distributed. ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.4, "percent_no": 50.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Bond Measures", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized $8", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized $8.877 billion in bonds to fund water infrastructure projects including groundwater and surface water storage, dam repairs, watershed protection, and habitat restoration. The measure specified how the bond funds would be allocated among various water-related projects throughout California.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Water Infrastructure, Supply and Watershed Protection Bond Initiative", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2018/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Water%20Infrastructure%2C%20Supply%20and%20Watershed%20Protect%202018", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11222, "fingerprint": "2018|201800474|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800474|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "a7b010eb407f247e", "measure_id": "201800474", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure extending until March 31, 2031 the City\u2019s existing \u00bc% transactions and use tax (\"sales tax\"), which raises approximately $900,000 annually for general fund purposes such as police and fire staffing and equipment, and enhanced recreation and park facilities, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2314, "no_votes": 1235, "total_votes": 3549, "percent_yes": 65.2014652014652, "percent_no": 34.7985347985348, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.638429", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.195614", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.620593", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure extending until March 31, 2031 the City\u2019s existing \u00bc% transactions and use tax (\"sales tax\"), which raises approximately $900,000 annually for general fund purposes such as police and fire staffing and equipment, and enhanced recreation and park facilities, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4085, "fingerprint": "2018|201800473|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800473|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "61b556d8cb0473ae", "measure_id": "201800473", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the voters of the City of Red Bluff approve an extension of the existing transactions and use tax (\u201csales tax\u201d), should the City Council continue to allocate 85% of proceeds of the continuing tax to the improvement of police and fire services and allocate the remainder to support parks, recreation and other general fund services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2460, "no_votes": 1025, "total_votes": 3485, "percent_yes": 70.58823529411765, "percent_no": 29.411764705882348, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.195211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.620396", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the voters of the City of Red Bluff approve an extension of the existing transactions and use tax (\u201csales tax\u201d), should the City Council continue to allocate 85% of proceeds of the continuing tax to the improvement of police and fire services and allocate the remainder to support parks, recreation and other general fund services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4087, "fingerprint": "2018|201800688|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800688|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "ad7870a0a07d30cc", "measure_id": "201800688", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate/upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities that improve the quality of education; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; upgrade inadequate electrical, heating and air conditioning systems; repair/replace leaky roofs; and make health/safety improvements, shall Red Bluff Union Elementary School District issue $12,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, raising on average $700,000 annually, estimated through 2053, levying approximately $0.03/$100 assessed valuation, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for administrator salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3799, "no_votes": 2481, "total_votes": 6280, "percent_yes": 60.4936305732484, "percent_no": 39.5063694267516, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.196195", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.620988", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate/upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities that improve the quality of education; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; upgrade inadequate electrical, heating and air conditioning systems; repair/replace leaky roofs; and make health/safety improvements, shall Red Bluff Union Elementary School District issue $12,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, raising on average $700,000 annually, estimated through 2053, levying approximately $0.03/$100 assessed valuation, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for administrator salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4086, "fingerprint": "2018|201800687|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800687|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "9e817ad4e35046b1", "measure_id": "201800687", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new gymnasium/multi-purpose room, enhance student safety and security, restructure the main entrance, modernize classrooms and support facilities, including restrooms, upgrade playgrounds and athletic fields, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Gerber Union Elementary School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, repayment averaging $435,700 annually while bonds are outstanding, at a rate of approximately 8.1 cents per $100 of assessed value, with annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 477, "no_votes": 435, "total_votes": 912, "percent_yes": 52.30263157894737, "percent_no": 47.69736842105263, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.195923", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.620794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new gymnasium/multi-purpose room, enhance student safety and security, restructure the main entrance, modernize classrooms and support facilities, including restrooms, upgrade playgrounds and athletic fields, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Gerber Union Elementary School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, repayment averaging $435,700 annually while bonds are outstanding, at a rate of approximately 8.1 cents per $100 of assessed value, with annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4094, "fingerprint": "2018|201800692|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800692|TULARE", "content_hash": "9fbc5cfdc9e047c1", "measure_id": "201800692", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Visalia Unified School District: upgrade classrooms, labs and computer systems to support science, technology, English, arts and math; prevent school/classroom overcrowding; and improve school safety/security; by issuing $105,300,000 in bonds at legal rates, repaying an annual average of $7,560,000 for 30 years, at approximately $36 per $100,000 of assessed value, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24297, "no_votes": 16103, "total_votes": 40400, "percent_yes": 60.1410891089109, "percent_no": 39.8589108910891, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.198207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.622404", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Visalia Unified School District: upgrade classrooms, labs and computer systems to support science, technology, English, arts and math; prevent school/classroom overcrowding; and improve school safety/security; by issuing $105,300,000 in bonds at legal rates, repaying an annual average of $7,560,000 for 30 years, at approximately $36 per $100,000 of assessed value, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4091, "fingerprint": "2018|201800689|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800689|TULARE", "content_hash": "39a0cac707674785", "measure_id": "201800689", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational quality; upgrade/modernize classrooms, restrooms, and support facilities; make health/safety/accessibility improvements; and repair/replace/upgrade old and inefficient plumbing and electrical systems; shall Ducor Union Elementary School District issue $2,100,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy an estimated average 3.0 cents/$100 of assessed value ($141,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and NO money for administrative salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 136, "no_votes": 129, "total_votes": 265, "percent_yes": 51.320754716981135, "percent_no": 48.679245283018865, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.197389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.621800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational quality; upgrade/modernize classrooms, restrooms, and support facilities; make health/safety/accessibility improvements; and repair/replace/upgrade old and inefficient plumbing and electrical systems; shall Ducor Union Elementary School District issue $2,100,000 of bonds at legal rates, levy an estimated average 3.0 cents/$100 of assessed value ($141,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and NO money for administrative salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4092, "fingerprint": "2018|201800690|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800690|TULARE", "content_hash": "3b7e26f796192e08", "measure_id": "201800690", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; construct a multipurpose room/gym; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Stone Corral School District issue $750,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising on average $49,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with NO money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57, "no_votes": 31, "total_votes": 88, "percent_yes": 64.77272727272727, "percent_no": 35.227272727272734, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.197667", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.621999", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; construct a multipurpose room/gym; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Stone Corral School District issue $750,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising on average $49,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with NO money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4093, "fingerprint": "2018|201800691|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800691|TULARE", "content_hash": "6ecd4650f43be951", "measure_id": "201800691", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; replace outdated and energy inefficient heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Three Rivers Union School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average $239,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with NO money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 838, "no_votes": 429, "total_votes": 1267, "percent_yes": 66.14048934490924, "percent_no": 33.85951065509076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.197939", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.622198", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; replace outdated and energy inefficient heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Three Rivers Union School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average $239,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with NO money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4089, "fingerprint": "2018|201800475|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800475|TULARE", "content_hash": "6121736c222ca45a", "measure_id": "201800475", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a commercial cannabis business tax in the City of Lindsay on commercial cannabis businesses up to $25 per square foot or up to 10% of gross receipts, as set by City Council, to maintain essential public safety and general City services including, but not limited to, police, drug addiction and gang prevention, park maintenance, street maintenance for Lindsay residents, generating undetermined revenue, potentially up to $500,000 to $3.5 million until repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1059, "no_votes": 463, "total_votes": 1522, "percent_yes": 69.57950065703022, "percent_no": 30.420499342969777, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.196733", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.621388", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a commercial cannabis business tax in the City of Lindsay on commercial cannabis businesses up to $25 per square foot or up to 10% of gross receipts, as set by City Council, to maintain essential public safety and general City services including, but not limited to, police, drug addiction and gang prevention, park maintenance, street maintenance for Lindsay residents, generating undetermined revenue, potentially up to $500,000 to $3.5 million until repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4090, "fingerprint": "2018|201800476|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800476|TULARE", "content_hash": "94dea1eb6bc4f6cc", "measure_id": "201800476", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to maintain police, fire, emergency response times; prevent property crimes like thefts and burglaries; maintain/increase neighborhood and school police patrols; maintain anti-gang, senior, youth services; increase after-school and library programs; address homelessness; repair potholes and streets; and other services by establishing a one cent sales tax providing approximately $6,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, citizen\u2019s oversight and all funds used for Porterville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6322, "no_votes": 3548, "total_votes": 9870, "percent_yes": 64.05268490374874, "percent_no": 35.94731509625126, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.197059", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.621580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to maintain police, fire, emergency response times; prevent property crimes like thefts and burglaries; maintain/increase neighborhood and school police patrols; maintain anti-gang, senior, youth services; increase after-school and library programs; address homelessness; repair potholes and streets; and other services by establishing a one cent sales tax providing approximately $6,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, citizen\u2019s oversight and all funds used for Porterville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4088, "fingerprint": "2018|201800097|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800097|TULARE", "content_hash": "f1fb8170bb5d4cc5", "measure_id": "201800097", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on May 2, 2018 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Tulare County ordering the formation of the Yettem-Seville Community Services District be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43, "no_votes": 17, "total_votes": 60, "percent_yes": 71.66666666666667, "percent_no": 28.33333333333333, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.196463", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.621194", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on May 2, 2018 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Tulare County ordering the formation of the Yettem-Seville Community Services District be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4095, "fingerprint": "2018|201800098|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800098|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "d7310709b89bb934", "measure_id": "201800098", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the special tax for ambulance services levied on certain improved residential and commercial parcels in the South County Ambulance Zone of County Service Area No. 21, as proposed in Resolution No. 11-18, be continued and increased from $70.00 to $90.00 per parcel per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 918, "no_votes": 403, "total_votes": 1321, "percent_yes": 69.49280847842545, "percent_no": 30.507191521574555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.198525", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.622609", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the special tax for ambulance services levied on certain improved residential and commercial parcels in the South County Ambulance Zone of County Service Area No. 21, as proposed in Resolution No. 11-18, be continued and increased from $70.00 to $90.00 per parcel per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4096, "fingerprint": "2018|201800099|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800099|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "85423083e981b31a", "measure_id": "201800099", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County ordinance be adopted adding Chapter 3.30 to the Tuolumne County Ordinance Code imposing a 0%-15% gross receipts tax on commercial cannabis businesses (but no less than $0-$15 per square foot for cultivation businesses as annually increased by a consumer price index) in the unincorporated area of Tuolumne County, and authorizing the Board of Supervisors to implement and adjust the tax at its discretion, with funds staying local for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including but not limited to public safety, health, environmental protection and addressing industry impacts, unless repealed or amended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12878, "no_votes": 7897, "total_votes": 20775, "percent_yes": 61.98796630565584, "percent_no": 38.01203369434416, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.198820", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.622802", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County ordinance be adopted adding Chapter 3.30 to the Tuolumne County Ordinance Code imposing a 0%-15% gross receipts tax on commercial cannabis businesses (but no less than $0-$15 per square foot for cultivation businesses as annually increased by a consumer price index) in the unincorporated area of Tuolumne County, and authorizing the Board of Supervisors to implement and adjust the tax at its discretion, with funds staying local for unrestricted general revenue purposes, including but not limited to public safety, health, environmental protection and addressing industry impacts, unless repealed or amended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4097, "fingerprint": "2018|201800100|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800100|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "52219cd9802d05a3", "measure_id": "201800100", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance imposing a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses, to help fund general municipal services; and increasing the City\u2019s appropriations limit for the Fiscal Years 2019-2023 by the amount of tax proceeds received, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1175, "no_votes": 571, "total_votes": 1746, "percent_yes": 67.2966781214204, "percent_no": 32.7033218785796, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.199092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.622994", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure adopting an ordinance imposing a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on cannabis businesses, to help fund general municipal services; and increasing the City\u2019s appropriations limit for the Fiscal Years 2019-2023 by the amount of tax proceeds received, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4112, "fingerprint": "2018|201800695|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800695|VENTURA", "content_hash": "aab1aac519a4e5eb", "measure_id": "201800695", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve/repair Adolfo Camarillo, Channel Islands, Condor, Frontier, Hueneme, Oxnard, Pacifica, Rio Mesa, and Rancho Campana and Oxnard Adult School including leaky roofs, outdated plumbing, electrical wiring and air conditioning; and construct a new high school in Oxnard, shall Oxnard Union High School District issue $350 million of bonds with legal rates, estimated annual repayments averaging $20 million for 31 years, projected tax rates of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, citizen oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25217, "no_votes": 19502, "total_votes": 44719, "percent_yes": 56.38990138419911, "percent_no": 43.61009861580089, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.203291", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.625912", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve/repair Adolfo Camarillo, Channel Islands, Condor, Frontier, Hueneme, Oxnard, Pacifica, Rio Mesa, and Rancho Campana and Oxnard Adult School including leaky roofs, outdated plumbing, electrical wiring and air conditioning; and construct a new high school in Oxnard, shall Oxnard Union High School District issue $350 million of bonds with legal rates, estimated annual repayments averaging $20 million for 31 years, projected tax rates of 3 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, citizen oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4111, "fingerprint": "2018|201800694|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800694|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e162e812f7c80858", "measure_id": "201800694", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade, modernize, and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; renovate plumbing, sewer, and build new classrooms; shall the Hueneme Elementary School District issue $34,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising between $1,300,000 and $3,300,000 annually at a rate of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3491, "no_votes": 1537, "total_votes": 5028, "percent_yes": 69.43118536197295, "percent_no": 30.56881463802705, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.202968", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.625712", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade, modernize, and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; renovate plumbing, sewer, and build new classrooms; shall the Hueneme Elementary School District issue $34,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising between $1,300,000 and $3,300,000 annually at a rate of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4113, "fingerprint": "2018|201800696|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800696|VENTURA", "content_hash": "285553a3b47a555e", "measure_id": "201800696", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; increase energy efficiency; modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to modern technology; shall Pleasant Valley School District issue $119,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, raising between $4,400,000 - $10,800,000 annually through 2048 at a rate of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10650, "no_votes": 8644, "total_votes": 19294, "percent_yes": 55.19850730797139, "percent_no": 44.80149269202861, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.203564", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.626101", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; increase energy efficiency; modernize and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to modern technology; shall Pleasant Valley School District issue $119,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, raising between $4,400,000 - $10,800,000 annually through 2048 at a rate of approximately $0.03 per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4110, "fingerprint": "2018|201800693|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800693|VENTURA", "content_hash": "c2495e4048a1b6b7", "measure_id": "201800693", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to modern technology; shall El Tejon Unified School District issue $16,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $900,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 5.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44, "no_votes": 40, "total_votes": 84, "percent_yes": 52.38095238095239, "percent_no": 47.61904761904761, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.202698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.625512", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to modern technology; shall El Tejon Unified School District issue $16,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, averaging $900,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 5.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4098, "fingerprint": "2018|201800477|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800477|VENTURA", "content_hash": "7c591fa4c76111da", "measure_id": "201800477", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending Camarillo Municipal Code Chapter 2.08 to limit Members of the City Council to serving no more than three consecutive four-year terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18445, "no_votes": 9544, "total_votes": 27989, "percent_yes": 65.90088963521383, "percent_no": 34.09911036478617, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.199356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.623193", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending Camarillo Municipal Code Chapter 2.08 to limit Members of the City Council to serving no more than three consecutive four-year terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4103, "fingerprint": "2018|201800482|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800482|VENTURA", "content_hash": "2ff8c3288902dd6a", "measure_id": "201800482", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general City services, including public safety, recreation, repairing and improving city streets, library services and senior services, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $1.2 to $2.5 million annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33713, "no_votes": 8551, "total_votes": 42264, "percent_yes": 79.76765095589627, "percent_no": 20.232349044103728, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.200755", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.624158", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general City services, including public safety, recreation, repairing and improving city streets, library services and senior services, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $1.2 to $2.5 million annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4101, "fingerprint": "2018|201800480|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800480|VENTURA", "content_hash": "cf909caebca85539", "measure_id": "201800480", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters repeal Measure A and return to five elected City Council members and a Mayor selected from among the five elected City Council members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1176, "no_votes": 2232, "total_votes": 3408, "percent_yes": 34.50704225352112, "percent_no": 65.49295774647888, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.200183", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.623779", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters repeal Measure A and return to five elected City Council members and a Mayor selected from among the five elected City Council members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4102, "fingerprint": "2018|201800481|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800481|VENTURA", "content_hash": "19645d89b5fed507", "measure_id": "201800481", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the elected Mayor's term of office, if retained, be changed from two years to four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1156, "no_votes": 2347, "total_votes": 3503, "percent_yes": 33.00028546959749, "percent_no": 66.99971453040251, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.200447", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.623970", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the elected Mayor's term of office, if retained, be changed from two years to four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4116, "fingerprint": "2018|201800699|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800699|VENTURA", "content_hash": "d3e376393b9b8323", "measure_id": "201800699", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and facilities; make health, safety, and security improvements; provide HVAC; upgrade technology; and construct new classrooms and libraries, shall Rio Elementary School District issue $59,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising on average $3,480,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of approximately 2.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6714, "no_votes": 2614, "total_votes": 9328, "percent_yes": 71.97684391080618, "percent_no": 28.02315608919382, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.204422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.626681", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and facilities; make health, safety, and security improvements; provide HVAC; upgrade technology; and construct new classrooms and libraries, shall Rio Elementary School District issue $59,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising on average $3,480,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of approximately 2.7 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent oversight committee, NO money for salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4099, "fingerprint": "2018|201800478|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800478|VENTURA", "content_hash": "7ed2bfbfee8c5c60", "measure_id": "201800478", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending Camarillo Municipal Code Chapter 2.08 to impose a lifetime limit on service as a Member of the City Council to no more than two, four-year terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16233, "no_votes": 11716, "total_votes": 27949, "percent_yes": 58.08079001037604, "percent_no": 41.91920998962396, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.199651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.623392", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending Camarillo Municipal Code Chapter 2.08 to impose a lifetime limit on service as a Member of the City Council to no more than two, four-year terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4105, "fingerprint": "2018|201800484|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800484|VENTURA", "content_hash": "331d21e9c3f059ba", "measure_id": "201800484", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Paula adopt an ordinance enacting a tax on cannabis businesses of up to $25.00 per square foot of space utilized for cannabis cultivation/processing, and up to 10% of gross receipts from the sale of cannabis and related products, potentially generating $500,000 annually for street repair, police enforcement and other unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5053, "no_votes": 1981, "total_votes": 7034, "percent_yes": 71.8367927210691, "percent_no": 28.163207278930898, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.201313", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.624551", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Paula adopt an ordinance enacting a tax on cannabis businesses of up to $25.00 per square foot of space utilized for cannabis cultivation/processing, and up to 10% of gross receipts from the sale of cannabis and related products, potentially generating $500,000 annually for street repair, police enforcement and other unrestricted general revenue purposes, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4115, "fingerprint": "2018|201800698|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800698|VENTURA", "content_hash": "f1cf5d747448d5ea", "measure_id": "201800698", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities;\r\nreplace/renovate aging heating and air-conditioning, deteriorating plumbing, and inadequate electrical systems; make safety and security improvements; shall Mesa Union School District issue $9,875,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average $532,090 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with independent citizens' oversight, NO money for administrative salaries, and all money spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 862, "no_votes": 683, "total_votes": 1545, "percent_yes": 55.79288025889968, "percent_no": 44.20711974110032, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.204156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.626492", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities;\r\nreplace/renovate aging heating and air-conditioning, deteriorating plumbing, and inadequate electrical systems; make safety and security improvements; shall Mesa Union School District issue $9,875,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, raising an average $532,090 annually as long as bonds are outstanding, at a rate of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with independent citizens' oversight, NO money for administrative salaries, and all money spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4109, "fingerprint": "2018|201800488|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800488|VENTURA", "content_hash": "c9b785cc48646a8e", "measure_id": "201800488", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, roads, and libraries, shall the City tax cannabis\r\n(marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation\r\n(adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $130,000 to $150,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39967, "no_votes": 12374, "total_votes": 52341, "percent_yes": 76.35887736191513, "percent_no": 23.641122638084866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.202398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.625318", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, roads, and libraries, shall the City tax cannabis\r\n(marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation\r\n(adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $130,000 to $150,000 annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4106, "fingerprint": "2018|201800485|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800485|VENTURA", "content_hash": "72790411fc71770d", "measure_id": "201800485", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to fund, for unrestricted general revenue purposes such as public safety, infrastructure, and streets, which taxes cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% or less for all other cannabis businesses, generating an unknown amount of revenue and levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31171, "no_votes": 15718, "total_votes": 46889, "percent_yes": 66.47827848749174, "percent_no": 33.521721512508265, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.201581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.624739", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to fund, for unrestricted general revenue purposes such as public safety, infrastructure, and streets, which taxes cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, and 4% or less for all other cannabis businesses, generating an unknown amount of revenue and levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4107, "fingerprint": "2018|201800486|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800486|VENTURA", "content_hash": "5059613161ebd7c6", "measure_id": "201800486", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council allow marijuana related businesses, such as cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, testing facilities, and deliveries to operate in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23609, "no_votes": 25588, "total_votes": 49197, "percent_yes": 47.98869849787588, "percent_no": 52.01130150212412, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.201843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.624933", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council allow marijuana related businesses, such as cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, testing facilities, and deliveries to operate in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4108, "fingerprint": "2018|201800487|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800487|VENTURA", "content_hash": "53e73e3449b60bc6", "measure_id": "201800487", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If the City allows marijuana related businesses to operate in the future, should those businesses be limited to operate only in the City\u2019s Sexually Oriented Business Overlay Zone?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21663, "no_votes": 25979, "total_votes": 47642, "percent_yes": 45.47038327526132, "percent_no": 54.52961672473868, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.202107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.625124", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If the City allows marijuana related businesses to operate in the future, should those businesses be limited to operate only in the City\u2019s Sexually Oriented Business Overlay Zone?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4100, "fingerprint": "2018|201800479|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800479|VENTURA", "content_hash": "06dc7294a952d309", "measure_id": "201800479", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure known as the RESTRICTION AND REGULATION OF COMMERCIAL MEDICAL\r\nCANNABIS CULTIVATION, which will regulate and authorize medical cannabis cultivation through a permitting process; require security including cameras, inspections, odor control, record keeping, employee background checks; and limit locations to indoor and only in industrial or commercial zones and 600 feet from schools, day care centers and youth centers, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1923, "no_votes": 2220, "total_votes": 4143, "percent_yes": 46.41564083997103, "percent_no": 53.58435916002897, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.199915", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.623586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure known as the RESTRICTION AND REGULATION OF COMMERCIAL MEDICAL\r\nCANNABIS CULTIVATION, which will regulate and authorize medical cannabis cultivation through a permitting process; require security including cameras, inspections, odor control, record keeping, employee background checks; and limit locations to indoor and only in industrial or commercial zones and 600 feet from schools, day care centers and youth centers, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4104, "fingerprint": "2018|201800483|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800483|VENTURA", "content_hash": "2306bf868047b911", "measure_id": "201800483", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent elimination of the City's Police Department/maintain long-term financial viability/essential services including quick 911 response; gang, drug, crime prevention and investigations; street, storm drain, pothole and gutter repair; keep public areas clean and graffiti-free; and provide other general City services, shall the ordinance establishing a one-cent sales tax until ended by voters be adopted to provide $1,800,000 annually, requiring citizen oversight and independent audits, with all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3789, "no_votes": 1676, "total_votes": 5465, "percent_yes": 69.33211344922232, "percent_no": 30.66788655077768, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.201049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.624355", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent elimination of the City's Police Department/maintain long-term financial viability/essential services including quick 911 response; gang, drug, crime prevention and investigations; street, storm drain, pothole and gutter repair; keep public areas clean and graffiti-free; and provide other general City services, shall the ordinance establishing a one-cent sales tax until ended by voters be adopted to provide $1,800,000 annually, requiring citizen oversight and independent audits, with all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4114, "fingerprint": "2018|201800697|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800697|VENTURA", "content_hash": "d727d07873621df3", "measure_id": "201800697", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade educational facilities/provide 21st Century technology to affordably prepare local students for jobs/university transfer, update classrooms/labs for career training in public safety, design, computer graphics, theatrical arts; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall this Allan Hancock Joint Community College District measure to issue $75,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates/replace bonds authorized in 2006, levy 1.1 cents/$100 assessed value, $2,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be approved, with oversight, audits, no administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23, "no_votes": 14, "total_votes": 37, "percent_yes": 62.16216216216216, "percent_no": 37.83783783783784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.203863", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.626301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade educational facilities/provide 21st Century technology to affordably prepare local students for jobs/university transfer, update classrooms/labs for career training in public safety, design, computer graphics, theatrical arts; acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall this Allan Hancock Joint Community College District measure to issue $75,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates/replace bonds authorized in 2006, levy 1.1 cents/$100 assessed value, $2,900,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be approved, with oversight, audits, no administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4121, "fingerprint": "2018|201800492|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800492|YOLO", "content_hash": "7099995613d1b746", "measure_id": "201800492", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of the city clerk and city treasurer for the City of Winters by Appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 692, "no_votes": 585, "total_votes": 1277, "percent_yes": 54.189506656225525, "percent_no": 45.810493343774475, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.205887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.627721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of the city clerk and city treasurer for the City of Winters by Appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4118, "fingerprint": "2018|201800489|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800489|YOLO", "content_hash": "3756685196190068", "measure_id": "201800489", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2521, which renews the existing Park Maintenance Tax of $49 per year on residential units and on nonresidential units in amounts specified in the Ordinance, for 20 years, adds an annual 2% inflator, and is expected to generate $1.4 million in the first year to fund maintenance of parks, street trees, greenbelts, bike paths, medians, public landscaping, urban wildlife and habitat, swimming pools, and public recreational facilities, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14031, "no_votes": 5032, "total_votes": 19063, "percent_yes": 73.60331532287677, "percent_no": 26.396684677123233, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.205032", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.627071", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2521, which renews the existing Park Maintenance Tax of $49 per year on residential units and on nonresidential units in amounts specified in the Ordinance, for 20 years, adds an annual 2% inflator, and is expected to generate $1.4 million in the first year to fund maintenance of parks, street trees, greenbelts, bike paths, medians, public landscaping, urban wildlife and habitat, swimming pools, and public recreational facilities, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4119, "fingerprint": "2018|201800490|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800490|YOLO", "content_hash": "650441d809016854", "measure_id": "201800490", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2522 be adopted to add Article 15.21 to the Davis Municipal Code to establish a Street and Bike Path Maintenance Tax of $99 per year on residential units and on nonresidential units in amounts specified in the Ordinance, to fund maintenance of streets, bike lanes and paths, sidewalks, and related transportation infrastructure, which is estimated to raise $2.8 million, with a 2% annual inflator, for a period of 10 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10762, "no_votes": 8083, "total_votes": 18845, "percent_yes": 57.10798620323694, "percent_no": 42.89201379676306, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.205325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.627266", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2522 be adopted to add Article 15.21 to the Davis Municipal Code to establish a Street and Bike Path Maintenance Tax of $99 per year on residential units and on nonresidential units in amounts specified in the Ordinance, to fund maintenance of streets, bike lanes and paths, sidewalks, and related transportation infrastructure, which is estimated to raise $2.8 million, with a 2% annual inflator, for a period of 10 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4120, "fingerprint": "2018|201800491|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800491|YOLO", "content_hash": "09dad0b4a83ad778", "measure_id": "201800491", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution 18-023 amending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designation for the Nishi property from Agriculture to Medium High Density Residential and Natural Habitat Area, as set forth in the Resolution and establishing the Baseline Project Features for development of the Nishi Project be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11638, "no_votes": 7572, "total_votes": 19210, "percent_yes": 60.58302967204581, "percent_no": 39.41697032795419, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.205623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.627483", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution 18-023 amending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designation for the Nishi property from Agriculture to Medium High Density Residential and Natural Habitat Area, as set forth in the Resolution and establishing the Baseline Project Features for development of the Nishi Project be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4117, "fingerprint": "2018|201800101|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800101|YOLO", "content_hash": "854fdddbb530582d", "measure_id": "201800101", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a tax be imposed on marijuana businesses in unincorporated Yolo County, between 1-15% of gross receipts, with a 4% initial rate on cultivation and 5% for other marijuana businesses, subject to a citizen\u2019s oversight committee, which can be spent for criminal enforcement of illegal cultivation, early childhood intervention and prevention, youth development, rural infrastructure and for other unrestricted general revenue purposes, with potential annual revenue of $1,000,000 plus, for an indefinite duration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35446, "no_votes": 9414, "total_votes": 44860, "percent_yes": 79.01471243869818, "percent_no": 20.985287561301817, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.204729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.626870", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a tax be imposed on marijuana businesses in unincorporated Yolo County, between 1-15% of gross receipts, with a 4% initial rate on cultivation and 5% for other marijuana businesses, subject to a citizen\u2019s oversight committee, which can be spent for criminal enforcement of illegal cultivation, early childhood intervention and prevention, youth development, rural infrastructure and for other unrestricted general revenue purposes, with potential annual revenue of $1,000,000 plus, for an indefinite duration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4122, "fingerprint": "2018|201800493|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800493|YOLO", "content_hash": "b904f9dc9f84bd09", "measure_id": "201800493", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution 18-094 amending the Davis General Plan to accommodate a senior housing development by changing the land use designation for the West Davis Active Adult Community property from Agriculture and Urban Agriculture Transition Area to Residential Medium Density, Residential High Density, Neighborhood Mixed Use, and Urban Agriculture Transition Area, as set forth in the Resolution and establishing the Baseline Project Features be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14969, "no_votes": 11915, "total_votes": 26884, "percent_yes": 55.67995833953281, "percent_no": 44.32004166046719, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.206149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.627912", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution 18-094 amending the Davis General Plan to accommodate a senior housing development by changing the land use designation for the West Davis Active Adult Community property from Agriculture and Urban Agriculture Transition Area to Residential Medium Density, Residential High Density, Neighborhood Mixed Use, and Urban Agriculture Transition Area, as set forth in the Resolution and establishing the Baseline Project Features be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4124, "fingerprint": "2018|201800700|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800700|YOLO", "content_hash": "2a8f1cfeadf725f9", "measure_id": "201800700", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update classrooms, science/Innovation labs, and facilities to meet current academic standards, improve accessibility for students, upgrade school safety/security, keep schools well-maintained, and modernize classroom learning technology, shall Davis Joint Unified School District Issue $150,900,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, raising $11,000,000 on average annually to repay bonds while outstanding, at an estimated rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22193, "no_votes": 7607, "total_votes": 29800, "percent_yes": 74.47315436241611, "percent_no": 25.52684563758389, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.206693", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.628296", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update classrooms, science/Innovation labs, and facilities to meet current academic standards, improve accessibility for students, upgrade school safety/security, keep schools well-maintained, and modernize classroom learning technology, shall Davis Joint Unified School District Issue $150,900,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, raising $11,000,000 on average annually to repay bonds while outstanding, at an estimated rate of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4123, "fingerprint": "2018|201800494|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800494|YOLO", "content_hash": "ef277106cccd476c", "measure_id": "201800494", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund public safety and investments in inclusive economic development and community improvements, shall the City of West Sacramento enact a \u00bc percent transactions and use tax (sales tax) providing approximately $3.4 million annually on an ongoing basis for general revenue purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7977, "no_votes": 7530, "total_votes": 15507, "percent_yes": 51.4412845811569, "percent_no": 48.5587154188431, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.206423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.628098", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund public safety and investments in inclusive economic development and community improvements, shall the City of West Sacramento enact a \u00bc percent transactions and use tax (sales tax) providing approximately $3.4 million annually on an ongoing basis for general revenue purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4126, "fingerprint": "2018|201800702|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800702|YOLO", "content_hash": "625542a8028688f8", "measure_id": "201800702", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To finance installation of a comprehensive HVAC system at Woodland High School and construction of a new practice gymnasium at Pioneer High School, shall the Woodland Joint Unified School District issue $20,200,000 of bonds with an estimated $4,448,000 in taxes raised annually on average for five years at average projected tax rates of 5.28 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9684, "no_votes": 10579, "total_votes": 20263, "percent_yes": 47.79154123278882, "percent_no": 52.20845876721118, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.207288", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.628699", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance installation of a comprehensive HVAC system at Woodland High School and construction of a new practice gymnasium at Pioneer High School, shall the Woodland Joint Unified School District issue $20,200,000 of bonds with an estimated $4,448,000 in taxes raised annually on average for five years at average projected tax rates of 5.28 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4125, "fingerprint": "2018|201800701|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800701|YOLO", "content_hash": "b435183468378283", "measure_id": "201800701", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; shall Winters Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 of bonds, raising on average $1,100,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1873, "no_votes": 885, "total_votes": 2758, "percent_yes": 67.91153009427121, "percent_no": 32.088469905728786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.206992", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.628494", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; shall Winters Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 of bonds, raising on average $1,100,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of 6 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4128, "fingerprint": "2018|201800703|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800703|YUBA", "content_hash": "c6a290ba7881b24a", "measure_id": "201800703", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the measure, to design and build a middle school that provides necessary modern facilities for students including spaces for science, math, art, technology, music and sports, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, authorize Plumas Lake Elementary School District to issue $20,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levy/collect on average $0.072/$100 of assessed value ($1,050,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with all funds used locally to construct a middle school, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 608, "no_votes": 630, "total_votes": 1238, "percent_yes": 49.11147011308562, "percent_no": 50.88852988691438, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.207842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.629095", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure, to design and build a middle school that provides necessary modern facilities for students including spaces for science, math, art, technology, music and sports, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, authorize Plumas Lake Elementary School District to issue $20,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levy/collect on average $0.072/$100 of assessed value ($1,050,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with all funds used locally to construct a middle school, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4129, "fingerprint": "2018|201800704|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800704|YUBA", "content_hash": "be402144364a9dcc", "measure_id": "201800704", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/improve aging local schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, replace leaking roofs, outdated heating, air conditioning, electrical/plumbing; remove asbestos/dry rot; upgrade outdated classrooms, science labs/technology; improve safety/security systems; acquire, construct, equip facilities, shall Marysville Joint Unified School District measure be adopted to issue $74,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average 5.634\u00a2/$100 assessed value ($4,187,470 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits/oversight, no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7349, "no_votes": 7103, "total_votes": 14452, "percent_yes": 50.851093274287294, "percent_no": 49.148906725712706, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.208141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.629297", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/improve aging local schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, replace leaking roofs, outdated heating, air conditioning, electrical/plumbing; remove asbestos/dry rot; upgrade outdated classrooms, science labs/technology; improve safety/security systems; acquire, construct, equip facilities, shall Marysville Joint Unified School District measure be adopted to issue $74,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average 5.634\u00a2/$100 assessed value ($4,187,470 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits/oversight, no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4127, "fingerprint": "2018|201800102|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2018|201800102|YUBA", "content_hash": "4c6262bd3feb84fc", "measure_id": "201800102", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2018, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain and protect essential services such as 9-1-1 emergency medical/fire response; improving wildland fire containment; maintaining 24-hours sheriff\u2019s patrol; attracting/retaining jobs, businesses and qualified sheriff deputies; and other essential services, shall the measure to establish a 1 cent sales tax for 10 years in unincorporated Yuba County, providing an estimated $4,300,000 annually requiring accountability, citizens\u2019 oversight/ audits, and all revenue controlled locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7694, "no_votes": 7051, "total_votes": 14745, "percent_yes": 52.1804001356392, "percent_no": 47.8195998643608, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2018-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.207561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.628890", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and protect essential services such as 9-1-1 emergency medical/fire response; improving wildland fire containment; maintaining 24-hours sheriff\u2019s patrol; attracting/retaining jobs, businesses and qualified sheriff deputies; and other essential services, shall the measure to establish a 1 cent sales tax for 10 years in unincorporated Yuba County, providing an estimated $4,300,000 annually requiring accountability, citizens\u2019 oversight/ audits, and all revenue controlled locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4130, "fingerprint": "2017|201700096|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700096|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "15a79b72cdcf0fe3", "measure_id": "201700096", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect critical education programs, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, including math, reading, writing, and hands-on science classes and labs; restore and maintain music and art programs; enhancing library services, technology and college preparation programs; and attracting and retaining qualified teachers; shall Hayward Unified School District renew its expiring voter approved education tax at $88 per parcel annually, for 12 years, with senior exemptions, independent citizens' oversight and all money used for classrooms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9101, "no_votes": 3778, "total_votes": 12879, "percent_yes": 70.66542433418743, "percent_no": 29.334575665812565, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-05-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.208439", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.629506", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect critical education programs, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, including math, reading, writing, and hands-on science classes and labs; restore and maintain music and art programs; enhancing library services, technology and college preparation programs; and attracting and retaining qualified teachers; shall Hayward Unified School District renew its expiring voter approved education tax at $88 per parcel annually, for 12 years, with senior exemptions, independent citizens' oversight and all money used for classrooms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4131, "fingerprint": "2017|201700097|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700097|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "af64b54f597867f1", "measure_id": "201700097", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and to continue programs to improve core education in our local schools, particularly in math, science, technology and the arts, support manageable class sizes, and school libraries, shall the San Leandro Unified School District renew its existing parcel tax for 14 years at a rate of $78 per year, with an exemption for seniors, independent fiscal oversight, no money for administration, and all money benefiting San Leandro students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5472, "no_votes": 3085, "total_votes": 8557, "percent_yes": 63.947645202757975, "percent_no": 36.052354797242025, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-08-29", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.208768", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.629703", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and to continue programs to improve core education in our local schools, particularly in math, science, technology and the arts, support manageable class sizes, and school libraries, shall the San Leandro Unified School District renew its existing parcel tax for 14 years at a rate of $78 per year, with an exemption for seniors, independent fiscal oversight, no money for administration, and all money benefiting San Leandro students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4133, "fingerprint": "2017|201700002|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700002|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "73d0526ab0638133", "measure_id": "201700002", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain Saddle Creek Community Services District owned facilities and easements including sidewalks, storm drains, landscaping, lighting, parks, security, weed and mosquito abatement, road improvement and maintenance, reserves, and administration, shall a new tax, providing $1.2 million annually and replacing the existing tax, be adopted without expiration at $1,703 per residential lot; $720 per acre for large lot undeveloped property; $640 per acre for sports club property; and $63,860 for the golf course property, including an annual CPI adjustment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 191, "no_votes": 85, "total_votes": 276, "percent_yes": 69.20289855072464, "percent_no": 30.79710144927536, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-05-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.209663", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.630092", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain Saddle Creek Community Services District owned facilities and easements including sidewalks, storm drains, landscaping, lighting, parks, security, weed and mosquito abatement, road improvement and maintenance, reserves, and administration, shall a new tax, providing $1.2 million annually and replacing the existing tax, be adopted without expiration at $1,703 per residential lot; $720 per acre for large lot undeveloped property; $640 per acre for sports club property; and $63,860 for the golf course property, including an annual CPI adjustment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4132, "fingerprint": "2017|201700001|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700001|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "260c0ab8d6a58bd7", "measure_id": "201700001", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain Copper Cove Rocky Road Community Service District roads shall a new tax, replacing the existing tax of $350 per residential lot, be adopted without expiration, at $450 per residential lot?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 87, "no_votes": 151, "total_votes": 238, "percent_yes": 36.55462184873949, "percent_no": 63.44537815126051, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-05-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.209190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.629899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain Copper Cove Rocky Road Community Service District roads shall a new tax, replacing the existing tax of $350 per residential lot, be adopted without expiration, at $450 per residential lot?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4134, "fingerprint": "2017|201700003|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700003|COLUSA", "content_hash": "c4a2b24f84cef0dc", "measure_id": "201700003", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Upon adoption by the majority of registered voters in the Cortina Community Services District, shall the board of Directors of the Cortina Community Services District (currently the County Board of Supervisors) be changed to a Board of Directors elected at large by registered voters of the district with such directors taking office if the measure is passed by a majority vote?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42, "no_votes": 10, "total_votes": 52, "percent_yes": 80.76923076923077, "percent_no": 19.230769230769226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.209930", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.630285", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Upon adoption by the majority of registered voters in the Cortina Community Services District, shall the board of Directors of the Cortina Community Services District (currently the County Board of Supervisors) be changed to a Board of Directors elected at large by registered voters of the district with such directors taking office if the measure is passed by a majority vote?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4135, "fingerprint": "2017|201700004|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700004|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "73d1ec874a5ce926", "measure_id": "201700004", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Marble Mountain Community Services District be authorized to annually assess each parcel located within the District which is not included within the boundaries of Road Improvement Zone \u201c1\u201d, (along Marble Ridge Road and Diablo Trail), a special tax in an amount up to, but not exceeding the amount of $400 per parcel to be expended for the maintenance and improvement of roadways located in those areas of the District lying outside of Road Improvement Zone \u201c1\u201d?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18, "no_votes": 10, "total_votes": 28, "percent_yes": 64.28571428571429, "percent_no": 35.71428571428571, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.210214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.630481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Marble Mountain Community Services District be authorized to annually assess each parcel located within the District which is not included within the boundaries of Road Improvement Zone \u201c1\u201d, (along Marble Ridge Road and Diablo Trail), a special tax in an amount up to, but not exceeding the amount of $400 per parcel to be expended for the maintenance and improvement of roadways located in those areas of the District lying outside of Road Improvement Zone \u201c1\u201d?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4136, "fingerprint": "2017|201700005|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700005|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "3e2abbafc2f455a7", "measure_id": "201700005", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "The special tax to fund maintaining, upgrading and improving district roads of the Cosumnes River Community Services District (CRCSD) was set at $150.00 in 1991. Shall the CRCSD increase this tax by $150.00 such that the annual tax level is reset to $300.00 per parcel, to remain at that level unless and until there are further voter approved changes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 67, "no_votes": 48, "total_votes": 115, "percent_yes": 58.26086956521739, "percent_no": 41.73913043478261, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.210509", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.630688", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The special tax to fund maintaining, upgrading and improving district roads of the Cosumnes River Community Services District (CRCSD) was set at $150.00 in 1991. Shall the CRCSD increase this tax by $150.00 such that the annual tax level is reset to $300.00 per parcel, to remain at that level unless and until there are further voter approved changes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4137, "fingerprint": "2017|201700015|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700015|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "c5910a0d570e6264", "measure_id": "201700015", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fix potholes and pave/repair/maintain local roads; improve safety for drivers/pedestrians/bicyclists; provide safe routes to school; and protect the clarity of Lake Tahoe by reducing sediment from roadways, shall an ordinance establishing a one-half percent sales tax be adopted for fifteen years, providing approximately $2.5 million annually in locally controlled funding for the Roads Management Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe, requiring an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and all funds for road improvement only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1497, "no_votes": 1312, "total_votes": 2809, "percent_yes": 53.29298682805269, "percent_no": 46.70701317194731, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.210828", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.630885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fix potholes and pave/repair/maintain local roads; improve safety for drivers/pedestrians/bicyclists; provide safe routes to school; and protect the clarity of Lake Tahoe by reducing sediment from roadways, shall an ordinance establishing a one-half percent sales tax be adopted for fifteen years, providing approximately $2.5 million annually in locally controlled funding for the Roads Management Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe, requiring an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and all funds for road improvement only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4138, "fingerprint": "2017|201700016|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700016|FRESNO", "content_hash": "06b6f884c4fca3ba", "measure_id": "201700016", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support local law enforcement activities, shall an ordinance be adopted imposing an annual special parcel tax amounting to: (i) $400/unit upon developed multi-family residences or apartments; (ii) $500/unit upon all other developed parcels; (iii) $100/ unit upon developed parcels for senior citizens; (iv) $50/unit upon undeveloped parcels for senior citizens; and (v) $100/ parcel for all other undeveloped parcels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83, "no_votes": 176, "total_votes": 259, "percent_yes": 32.04633204633205, "percent_no": 67.95366795366795, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-08-29", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.211216", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.631090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support local law enforcement activities, shall an ordinance be adopted imposing an annual special parcel tax amounting to: (i) $400/unit upon developed multi-family residences or apartments; (ii) $500/unit upon all other developed parcels; (iii) $100/ unit upon developed parcels for senior citizens; (iv) $50/unit upon undeveloped parcels for senior citizens; and (v) $100/ parcel for all other undeveloped parcels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4139, "fingerprint": "2017|201700017|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700017|FRESNO", "content_hash": "6c52f3674c4a0a70", "measure_id": "201700017", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide additional funding for local law enforcement services, shall the ordinance increasing the City\u2019s Sales and Use Tax from .980% to 1.980% which will raise approximately $500,000 annually be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108, "no_votes": 151, "total_votes": 259, "percent_yes": 41.6988416988417, "percent_no": 58.3011583011583, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-08-29", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.211529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.631285", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide additional funding for local law enforcement services, shall the ordinance increasing the City\u2019s Sales and Use Tax from .980% to 1.980% which will raise approximately $500,000 annually be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4140, "fingerprint": "2017|201700018|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700018|FRESNO", "content_hash": "886267163e57f3a0", "measure_id": "201700018", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help prevent the loss of vital public safety services, and to protect other general services, shall the City of Coalinga enact a general-purpose, one-percent sales tax, expected to generate $850,000 annually, with annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 545, "no_votes": 582, "total_votes": 1127, "percent_yes": 48.358473824312334, "percent_no": 51.641526175687666, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.211892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.631487", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help prevent the loss of vital public safety services, and to protect other general services, shall the City of Coalinga enact a general-purpose, one-percent sales tax, expected to generate $850,000 annually, with annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4141, "fingerprint": "2017|201700019|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700019|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "55095b4dfba020bd", "measure_id": "201700019", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance creating a new business tax of up to give dollars per square foot of space utilized for certain commercial cannabis cultivation activity and, for other commercial cannabis activity, a tax of up to ten percent of gross receipts be adopted, with all proceeds placed in the City's General Fund to be used for any governmental purpose? The tax imposed by this Ordinance is expected to generate $980,000 in annual revenue and will continue in effect until later repealed", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 353, "no_votes": 83, "total_votes": 436, "percent_yes": 80.96330275229357, "percent_no": 19.036697247706428, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.212175", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.631677", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance creating a new business tax of up to give dollars per square foot of space utilized for certain commercial cannabis cultivation activity and, for other commercial cannabis activity, a tax of up to ten percent of gross receipts be adopted, with all proceeds placed in the City's General Fund to be used for any governmental purpose? The tax imposed by this Ordinance is expected to generate $980,000 in annual revenue and will continue in effect until later repealed", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4142, "fingerprint": "2017|201700020|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700020|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "83e2ec568cf1e8f2", "measure_id": "201700020", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Brawley ordinance extending the Utility Users Tax for five years at a rate not to exceed 4%, upon the use of telephone, electricity, gas, water, sewer, trash and cable television utilities, to maintain city services, including, but not limited to, police, fire, administration, library and parks and recreation, and subject to future council action to reduce said percentage, and which is projected to raise $1.9 million per year, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1649, "no_votes": 1010, "total_votes": 2659, "percent_yes": 62.01579541180895, "percent_no": 37.98420458819105, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.212491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.631867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Brawley ordinance extending the Utility Users Tax for five years at a rate not to exceed 4%, upon the use of telephone, electricity, gas, water, sewer, trash and cable television utilities, to maintain city services, including, but not limited to, police, fire, administration, library and parks and recreation, and subject to future council action to reduce said percentage, and which is projected to raise $1.9 million per year, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4143, "fingerprint": "2017|201700021|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700021|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "8a6360d50f083882", "measure_id": "201700021", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer which is currently an elected position be consolidated with the position of City Finance Director and be converted to a position to be filled by City Council appointment commencing upon the expiration of the term of the current City Treasurer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1312, "no_votes": 1247, "total_votes": 2559, "percent_yes": 51.27002735443532, "percent_no": 48.72997264556468, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.212835", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.632056", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer which is currently an elected position be consolidated with the position of City Finance Director and be converted to a position to be filled by City Council appointment commencing upon the expiration of the term of the current City Treasurer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4144, "fingerprint": "2017|201700022|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700022|KERN", "content_hash": "89f6c629ddd57152", "measure_id": "201700022", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, urgent care, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $7.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation) and not to exceed 6% of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $3.4 million annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1183, "no_votes": 393, "total_votes": 1576, "percent_yes": 75.06345177664974, "percent_no": 24.936548223350258, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.213178", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.632245", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general municipal expenses such as police, fire, urgent care, roads and recreation, shall the City tax cannabis (marijuana) businesses at annual rates not to exceed $7.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation) and not to exceed 6% of gross receipts for all other cannabis businesses; which is expected to generate an estimated $3.4 million annually and will be levied until repealed by the voters or the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4145, "fingerprint": "2017|201700023|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700023|KERN", "content_hash": "c72f39e27d530a6f", "measure_id": "201700023", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to fund police, fire, and code enforcement services, shall the existing special parcel tax be extended for an additional three years (through tax year 2020-2021) at a rate not to exceed the existing rate of $150 per lot or parcel, generating approximately $7.5 Million in annual funding for public safety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 727, "no_votes": 848, "total_votes": 1575, "percent_yes": 46.15873015873016, "percent_no": 53.84126984126984, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.213464", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.632445", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to fund police, fire, and code enforcement services, shall the existing special parcel tax be extended for an additional three years (through tax year 2020-2021) at a rate not to exceed the existing rate of $150 per lot or parcel, generating approximately $7.5 Million in annual funding for public safety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4146, "fingerprint": "2017|201700098|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700098|KERN", "content_hash": "e063fc7810fb37aa", "measure_id": "201700098", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build, renovate or expand new or existing school facilities and provide 21st century learning environments, reduce student overcrowding, increase classroom technology infrastructure, and upgrade vocational education facilities to prepare students for college and high-paying jobs after graduation, shall the McFarland Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $20 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 238, "no_votes": 375, "total_votes": 613, "percent_yes": 38.82544861337683, "percent_no": 61.17455138662317, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-07-25", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.213818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.632641", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build, renovate or expand new or existing school facilities and provide 21st century learning environments, reduce student overcrowding, increase classroom technology infrastructure, and upgrade vocational education facilities to prepare students for college and high-paying jobs after graduation, shall the McFarland Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $20 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4147, "fingerprint": "2017|201700024|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700024|KINGS", "content_hash": "fa93f4bf4b249cc5", "measure_id": "201700024", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the safety and character of Corcoran, and maintain essential general City services for Corcoran residents including police, 911 emergency response, fire protection, disaster preparedness, recreational programs and facilities, park maintenance and improvements, street maintenance and repairs and other essential services, shall Ordinance No. 631, imposing a 1 cent general sales and use tax, be adopted? Estimated revenues between $1,000,000 and $1,200,000 annually, indefinitely.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 466, "no_votes": 332, "total_votes": 798, "percent_yes": 58.39598997493734, "percent_no": 41.60401002506266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.214126", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.632833", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the safety and character of Corcoran, and maintain essential general City services for Corcoran residents including police, 911 emergency response, fire protection, disaster preparedness, recreational programs and facilities, park maintenance and improvements, street maintenance and repairs and other essential services, shall Ordinance No. 631, imposing a 1 cent general sales and use tax, be adopted? Estimated revenues between $1,000,000 and $1,200,000 annually, indefinitely.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11229, "fingerprint": "2017|201700099|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700099|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d808de8911df8a40", "measure_id": "201700099", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To keep Arcadia schools among the best in California by renewing approximately $4.3 million in annual local funding the state cannot take away, shall Arcadia Unified School District continue attracting/retaining quality teachers; keeping schools safe/clean; protecting quality math, science, technology, reading, writing, art and music programs by extending the expiring school parcel tax at $288 per parcel annually for 18 years, requiring independent oversight/audits, senior exemptions, and all funds used locally to maintain quality education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4874, "no_votes": 2333, "total_votes": 7207, "percent_yes": 67.62869432496184, "percent_no": 32.37130567503816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.655826", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.222046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.638274", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep Arcadia schools among the best in California by renewing approximately $4.3 million in annual local funding the state cannot take away, shall Arcadia Unified School District continue attracting/retaining quality teachers; keeping schools safe/clean; protecting quality math, science, technology, reading, writing, art and music programs by extending the expiring school parcel tax at $288 per parcel annually for 18 years, requiring independent oversight/audits, senior exemptions, and all funds used locally to maintain quality education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4165, "fingerprint": "2017|201700043|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700043|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cde496bca7a26aa2", "measure_id": "201700043", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Compton City Charter be amended to set the salary of Council members to $43,000, and to set the Mayor's annual salary to $54,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 887, "no_votes": 2418, "total_votes": 3305, "percent_yes": 26.83812405446293, "percent_no": 73.16187594553708, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.219791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.636726", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Compton City Charter be amended to set the salary of Council members to $43,000, and to set the Mayor's annual salary to $54,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4150, "fingerprint": "2017|201700026|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700026|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "96a98b8f44b70a10", "measure_id": "201700026", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposition imposing a tax on cannabis related businesses operating within the City of Bellflower be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3159, "no_votes": 1119, "total_votes": 4278, "percent_yes": 73.8429172510519, "percent_no": 26.1570827489481, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.215029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.633431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposition imposing a tax on cannabis related businesses operating within the City of Bellflower be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11227, "fingerprint": "2017|201700049|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700049|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d56102f694bc4ad9", "measure_id": "201700049", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted repealing the March 2013 amendments made to the City's View Preservation Ordinance by Measure B?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 441, "no_votes": 302, "total_votes": 743, "percent_yes": 59.35397039030955, "percent_no": 40.64602960969045, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.655450", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.221417", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.637887", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted repealing the March 2013 amendments made to the City's View Preservation Ordinance by Measure B?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11224, "fingerprint": "2017|201700042|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700042|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c4c1ed67a5356684", "measure_id": "201700042", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve Carson services, such as 911 emergency, Sheriff protection, senior/youth/anti-gang programs; repair streets; improve air/environmental quality, reduce hazardous waste; shall an ordinance be adopted imposing tax of 1/4th of 1% of gross receipts of operators of facilities blending, mixing, processing, or refining petroleum or petroleum products and/or storing petroleum products, to provide approximately $24,000,000 anually until ended by voters, requiring regular compliance audits, with funds used in Carson?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5894, "no_votes": 2223, "total_votes": 8117, "percent_yes": 72.61303437230504, "percent_no": 27.386965627694963, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.654142", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.219493", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.636532", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve Carson services, such as 911 emergency, Sheriff protection, senior/youth/anti-gang programs; repair streets; improve air/environmental quality, reduce hazardous waste; shall an ordinance be adopted imposing tax of 1/4th of 1% of gross receipts of operators of facilities blending, mixing, processing, or refining petroleum or petroleum products and/or storing petroleum products, to provide approximately $24,000,000 anually until ended by voters, requiring regular compliance audits, with funds used in Carson?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11223, "fingerprint": "2017|201700041|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700041|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b164321588763c57", "measure_id": "201700041", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow the City Council to provide that a police officer who is entitled to a Police Department Board of Rights hearing for a disciplinary matter may select a Board of Rights composed of all civilian members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 113198, "no_votes": 93296, "total_votes": 206494, "percent_yes": 54.81902621867948, "percent_no": 45.18097378132052, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-05-16", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.653956", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.219221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.636339", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow the City Council to provide that a police officer who is entitled to a Police Department Board of Rights hearing for a disciplinary matter may select a Board of Rights composed of all civilian members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4159, "fingerprint": "2017|201700035|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700035|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c8baef3f6b0e49a3", "measure_id": "201700035", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Redondo Beach approve amendments to its Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance (partially adopted in 2010 in Measure G) to provide additional analytical procedures and additional limits reducing the amount and type of development in the Coastal Commercial Zones and the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Zone (Seaside Lagoon), located in the Redondo Beach King Harbor-Pier area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9229, "no_votes": 6925, "total_votes": 16154, "percent_yes": 57.131360653708064, "percent_no": 42.868639346291936, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.217578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.635179", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Redondo Beach approve amendments to its Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance (partially adopted in 2010 in Measure G) to provide additional analytical procedures and additional limits reducing the amount and type of development in the Coastal Commercial Zones and the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Zone (Seaside Lagoon), located in the Redondo Beach King Harbor-Pier area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4151, "fingerprint": "2017|201700027|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700027|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "76a237a30c35415d", "measure_id": "201700027", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue to provide about $5 million annually to preserve essential City services like Police, Fire, Parks, Library, Recreation and Public Works and other local programs and general services, shall an ordinance be adopted to extend the City of Covina's current 6% utility users tax on telephone, gas, electricity and water services to March of 2029, without raising the rate of the tax or taxing any additional utility services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2740, "no_votes": 1098, "total_votes": 3838, "percent_yes": 71.39134966128192, "percent_no": 28.60865033871808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.215321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.633621", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to provide about $5 million annually to preserve essential City services like Police, Fire, Parks, Library, Recreation and Public Works and other local programs and general services, shall an ordinance be adopted to extend the City of Covina's current 6% utility users tax on telephone, gas, electricity and water services to March of 2029, without raising the rate of the tax or taxing any additional utility services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4158, "fingerprint": "2017|201700034|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700034|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a1c1cd7dda5c44fc", "measure_id": "201700034", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that continues a levy of the existing special tax for a period of twelve (12) years on each eligible parcel in the City at the initial base rate of $342.34 plus $0.196073 per square foot of building improvement effective July 1, 2017, and maintains the existing 6.2% limit on annual adjustments, initially generating approximately $4.7 million annually to finance fire suppression and paramedic services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2198, "no_votes": 1470, "total_votes": 3668, "percent_yes": 59.92366412213741, "percent_no": 40.07633587786259, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.217246", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.634988", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that continues a levy of the existing special tax for a period of twelve (12) years on each eligible parcel in the City at the initial base rate of $342.34 plus $0.196073 per square foot of building improvement effective July 1, 2017, and maintains the existing 6.2% limit on annual adjustments, initially generating approximately $4.7 million annually to finance fire suppression and paramedic services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4163, "fingerprint": "2017|201700039|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700039|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0b78826ab1dd4d8f", "measure_id": "201700039", "measure_letter": "DE", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to allow the Board of Education for Inglewood City Schools to change the method of election of the Board of Education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1654, "no_votes": 1247, "total_votes": 2901, "percent_yes": 57.01482247500862, "percent_no": 42.98517752499138, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-04-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.218690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.635955", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to allow the Board of Education for Inglewood City Schools to change the method of election of the Board of Education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4166, "fingerprint": "2017|201700044|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700044|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "418be1ed1297c081", "measure_id": "201700044", "measure_letter": "EM", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve and stabilize funding for various essential City services such as fire and emergency response services; police staffing; street maintenance; senior and youth programs; park maintenance; graffiti removal; State-mandated storm drain upgrades; and to restore the City's \"rainy day\" general fund reserves, shall the City's existing half percent (1/2%) transactions and use tax be extended for ten years, subject always to the voters' power of repeal?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2187, "no_votes": 960, "total_votes": 3147, "percent_yes": 69.49475691134414, "percent_no": 30.50524308865586, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.220056", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.636917", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve and stabilize funding for various essential City services such as fire and emergency response services; police staffing; street maintenance; senior and youth programs; park maintenance; graffiti removal; State-mandated storm drain upgrades; and to restore the City's \"rainy day\" general fund reserves, shall the City's existing half percent (1/2%) transactions and use tax be extended for ten years, subject always to the voters' power of repeal?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4161, "fingerprint": "2017|201700037|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700037|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3594566bd9b0e26f", "measure_id": "201700037", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the proposed citizen's intitative measure to tax medical marijuana facilities in the City of Signal Hill through a 10% tax on the monetary transactions as well as doubling the license taxes, with no sunset clause, and currently estimated to raise $0.00 annually because medical marijuana facilities are not presently allowed in the city of Signal Hill be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 534, "no_votes": 605, "total_votes": 1139, "percent_yes": 46.88323090430202, "percent_no": 53.11676909569798, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.218102", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.635569", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the proposed citizen's intitative measure to tax medical marijuana facilities in the City of Signal Hill through a 10% tax on the monetary transactions as well as doubling the license taxes, with no sunset clause, and currently estimated to raise $0.00 annually because medical marijuana facilities are not presently allowed in the city of Signal Hill be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4168, "fingerprint": "2017|201700046|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700046|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6eb90ee60ec6351f", "measure_id": "201700046", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to renew the City's authority to spend existing revenues from the special fire tax approved by two-thirds of the City's voters in 1997 to provide essential fire and life safety services by renewing the voter-approved amendment to the City's appropriations limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 844, "no_votes": 169, "total_votes": 1013, "percent_yes": 83.31688055281342, "percent_no": 16.683119447186584, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.220605", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.637300", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to renew the City's authority to spend existing revenues from the special fire tax approved by two-thirds of the City's voters in 1997 to provide essential fire and life safety services by renewing the voter-approved amendment to the City's appropriations limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4169, "fingerprint": "2017|201700100|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700100|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "56f5ed47311d96d3", "measure_id": "201700100", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade and modernize classrooms, science labs, career training facilities, computer systems, and instructional technology to support high quality instruction/student achievement in science, technology, engineering, math/skilled trades, acquire, construct, and repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, repair aging plumbing, electrical, heating/ventilation systems, improve student safety and campus security systems, shall Glendora Unified School District issue $98,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2461, "no_votes": 2763, "total_votes": 5224, "percent_yes": 47.10949464012251, "percent_no": 52.89050535987749, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.222337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.638477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and modernize classrooms, science labs, career training facilities, computer systems, and instructional technology to support high quality instruction/student achievement in science, technology, engineering, math/skilled trades, acquire, construct, and repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, repair aging plumbing, electrical, heating/ventilation systems, improve student safety and campus security systems, shall Glendora Unified School District issue $98,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4148, "fingerprint": "2017|201700006|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700006|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "663e070202ec3228", "measure_id": "201700006", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To fund mental health, substance abuse treatment, health care, education, job training, rental subsidies, emergency and affordable housing, transportation, outreach, prevention, and supportive services for homeless children, families, foster youth, veterans, battered women, seniors, disabled individuals, and other homeless adults; shall voters authorize Ordinance No. 2017-0001 to levy a \u00bc cent sales tax for ten years, with independent annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 585905, "no_votes": 259098, "total_votes": 845003, "percent_yes": 69.33762365340715, "percent_no": 30.66237634659285, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.214462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.633031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund mental health, substance abuse treatment, health care, education, job training, rental subsidies, emergency and affordable housing, transportation, outreach, prevention, and supportive services for homeless children, families, foster youth, veterans, battered women, seniors, disabled individuals, and other homeless adults; shall voters authorize Ordinance No. 2017-0001 to levy a \u00bc cent sales tax for ten years, with independent annual audits and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4167, "fingerprint": "2017|201700045|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700045|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "53a861bb483e4001", "measure_id": "201700045", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general city services, such as police, fire, senior services, streets, parks, paramedics, 9-1-1, anti-gang units, and other general city services, shall the City of Hawthorne Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance of 2017 be approved, imposing a 0.75% transactions and use (sales) tax, with annual audit and appointment of a Citizen's Oversight Committee, to be collected until repealed by the voters or the City Council and estimated to raise approximately $8.5 million per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2745, "no_votes": 1239, "total_votes": 3984, "percent_yes": 68.90060240963855, "percent_no": 31.09939759036145, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.220338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.637107", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general city services, such as police, fire, senior services, streets, parks, paramedics, 9-1-1, anti-gang units, and other general city services, shall the City of Hawthorne Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance of 2017 be approved, imposing a 0.75% transactions and use (sales) tax, with annual audit and appointment of a Citizen's Oversight Committee, to be collected until repealed by the voters or the City Council and estimated to raise approximately $8.5 million per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11228, "fingerprint": "2017|201700050|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700050|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8c94e6757f9f52df", "measure_id": "201700050", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To expand 58-year-old Whittier Central Library to meet 21st century needs, including: providing a children's area for story times, parent/child reading, and children's book collections/technology; improving senior/disabled access; expanding/updating computer/technology center; space for up-to-date book/resource collections; relocating the Veterans Resource Center for better service; and related improvements; shall the City of Whittier issue $22,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent citizen oversight, and all funds for Whittier Central Library only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4278, "no_votes": 2160, "total_votes": 6438, "percent_yes": 66.44920782851817, "percent_no": 33.55079217148183, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.655641", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.221686", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.638081", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand 58-year-old Whittier Central Library to meet 21st century needs, including: providing a children's area for story times, parent/child reading, and children's book collections/technology; improving senior/disabled access; expanding/updating computer/technology center; space for up-to-date book/resource collections; relocating the Veterans Resource Center for better service; and related improvements; shall the City of Whittier issue $22,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent citizen oversight, and all funds for Whittier Central Library only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4162, "fingerprint": "2017|201700038|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700038|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2f334bee2cf95ef4", "measure_id": "201700038", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require term limits for councilmembers: councilmembers may not serve more than three terms; a partial term of two years or more will be deemed a full term; and the measure will not apply to councilmember terms that commenced prior to adoption of this measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16707, "no_votes": 2965, "total_votes": 19672, "percent_yes": 84.92781618544124, "percent_no": 15.072183814558755, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-04-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.218365", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.635761", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require term limits for councilmembers: councilmembers may not serve more than three terms; a partial term of two years or more will be deemed a full term; and the measure will not apply to councilmember terms that commenced prior to adoption of this measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4170, "fingerprint": "2017|201700101|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700101|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "52de02b1c117829b", "measure_id": "201700101", "measure_letter": "LCF", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize classroom and school facilities, including fixing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, improve student safety and campus security systems, upgrade/expand classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities and instructional technology to support advanced programs in math, science, engineering, technology and the arts, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, shall La Canada Unified School District issue $149,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, all money staying local and without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2900, "no_votes": 1185, "total_votes": 4085, "percent_yes": 70.99143206854345, "percent_no": 29.008567931456554, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.222668", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.638672", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize classroom and school facilities, including fixing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, improve student safety and campus security systems, upgrade/expand classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities and instructional technology to support advanced programs in math, science, engineering, technology and the arts, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, shall La Canada Unified School District issue $149,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, all money staying local and without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4157, "fingerprint": "2017|201700033|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700033|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5032aabd248d0056", "measure_id": "201700033", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposition renewing a special parcel tax for library services at the Monterey Park Bruggemeyer Library be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2985, "no_votes": 1954, "total_votes": 4939, "percent_yes": 60.43733549301478, "percent_no": 39.56266450698522, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.216978", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.634794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposition renewing a special parcel tax for library services at the Monterey Park Bruggemeyer Library be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4153, "fingerprint": "2017|201700029|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700029|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "08af0f6928bc0a91", "measure_id": "201700029", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance providing for enforcement, taxation and regulation of cannabis and/or cannabis products (cannabis) by: 1) providing that the City Council retains the authority to amend existing and adopt new regulations regarding cannabis activity in the City after conducting public hearings regarding various aspects of the commercialization of cannabis and medical cannabis, and giving priority in the processing of applications to existing medical marijuana dispensaries operating in compliance with current City law; 2) authorizing criminal penalties, nuisance abatement, increased civil fines and disconnection of water and power utilities for unauthorized cannabis activities; and 3) establishing new business taxes, effective January 1, 2018, including taxes of $100 per each $1,000 of gross receipts from cannabis sales and $50 per each $1,000 of gross receipts from medical cannabis sales, $10 per each $1,000 of gross receipts from cannabis transportation, testing or research, and $20 per each $1,000 of gross receipts from cannabis manufacturing, cultivation or other commercialization of cannabis; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 319017, "no_votes": 77523, "total_votes": 396540, "percent_yes": 80.45014374338024, "percent_no": 19.549856256619762, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.215854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.634007", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance providing for enforcement, taxation and regulation of cannabis and/or cannabis products (cannabis) by: 1) providing that the City Council retains the authority to amend existing and adopt new regulations regarding cannabis activity in the City after conducting public hearings regarding various aspects of the commercialization of cannabis and medical cannabis, and giving priority in the processing of applications to existing medical marijuana dispensaries operating in compliance with current City law; 2) authorizing criminal penalties, nuisance abatement, increased civil fines and disconnection of water and power utilities for unauthorized cannabis activities; and 3) establishing new business taxes, effective January 1, 2018, including taxes of $100 per each $1,000 of gross receipts from cannabis sales and $50 per each $1,000 of gross receipts from medical cannabis sales, $10 per each $1,000 of gross receipts from cannabis transportation, testing or research, and $20 per each $1,000 of gross receipts from cannabis manufacturing, cultivation or other commercialization of cannabis; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4154, "fingerprint": "2017|201700030|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700030|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "17be403eb4ccc2ce", "measure_id": "201700030", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance establishing a City permitting program for cannabis activity, prioritizing existing medical marijuana businesses compliant with current City law (MMBs) and maintaining 135 dispensaries in the City unless increased by the City Council, including by: 1) authorizing the City to issue permits for cannabis activity including cultivation, manufacture and sale of medical cannabis; 2) providing existing compliant MMBs a limited time to register for initial permits for specified cannabis activity and other priority in the permitting process; 3) allowing permitted cannabis activity in certain non-residential zones; 4) providing operational standards and minimum-distance requirements from schools and other sites; 5) authorizing fines and other penalties for non-permitted cannabis activity but limit enforcement procedures for violations of the ordinance by permit holders; and 6) allowing permittees to operate as adult use marijuana businesses and impose a tax of $80 per each $1,000 of gross receipts from adult use marijuana sales if state law changes to allow non-medical adult use of marijuana; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134787, "no_votes": 250896, "total_votes": 385683, "percent_yes": 34.94761241745164, "percent_no": 65.05238758254836, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.216150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.634205", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance establishing a City permitting program for cannabis activity, prioritizing existing medical marijuana businesses compliant with current City law (MMBs) and maintaining 135 dispensaries in the City unless increased by the City Council, including by: 1) authorizing the City to issue permits for cannabis activity including cultivation, manufacture and sale of medical cannabis; 2) providing existing compliant MMBs a limited time to register for initial permits for specified cannabis activity and other priority in the permitting process; 3) allowing permitted cannabis activity in certain non-residential zones; 4) providing operational standards and minimum-distance requirements from schools and other sites; 5) authorizing fines and other penalties for non-permitted cannabis activity but limit enforcement procedures for violations of the ordinance by permit holders; and 6) allowing permittees to operate as adult use marijuana businesses and impose a tax of $80 per each $1,000 of gross receipts from adult use marijuana sales if state law changes to allow non-medical adult use of marijuana; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4155, "fingerprint": "2017|201700031|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700031|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6e450e9dff3b8bcb", "measure_id": "201700031", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to increase the maximum term for franchises, concessions, permits, licenses and leases that may be entered into by the Harbor Department from the current maximum of 50 years to a new maximum of 66 years, to be consistent with recent changes to state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 251398, "no_votes": 116059, "total_votes": 367457, "percent_yes": 68.41562414105596, "percent_no": 31.584375858944043, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.216443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.634403", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to increase the maximum term for franchises, concessions, permits, licenses and leases that may be entered into by the Harbor Department from the current maximum of 50 years to a new maximum of 66 years, to be consistent with recent changes to state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4152, "fingerprint": "2017|201700028|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700028|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "eed93a864feb225b", "measure_id": "201700028", "measure_letter": "PS", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the 2017 Temporary Public Safety Funding Ordinance imposing an excise tax of $139 per parcel per year on single-family and unimproved property; $181 per dwelling per year on multifamily property; and between $1,550 to $49,600 per parcel per year on industrial, commercial, mobilehome park and other nonresidential properties be adopted for 5 years to raise approximately $2,000,000 per year to pay for approximately half of the City's annual cost of providing police protection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 333, "no_votes": 925, "total_votes": 1258, "percent_yes": 26.47058823529412, "percent_no": 73.52941176470588, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.215589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.633815", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the 2017 Temporary Public Safety Funding Ordinance imposing an excise tax of $139 per parcel per year on single-family and unimproved property; $181 per dwelling per year on multifamily property; and between $1,550 to $49,600 per parcel per year on industrial, commercial, mobilehome park and other nonresidential properties be adopted for 5 years to raise approximately $2,000,000 per year to pay for approximately half of the City's annual cost of providing police protection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4164, "fingerprint": "2017|201700040|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700040|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "21b890e041435eba", "measure_id": "201700040", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize the levy of a 6% utility users' tax on electricity, gas, telecommunications, video and water utility services, with  exemptions for residential services provided to persons with disabilities and low income households?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14, "no_votes": 23, "total_votes": 37, "percent_yes": 37.83783783783784, "percent_no": 62.16216216216216, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-04-11", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.218956", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.636149", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize the levy of a 6% utility users' tax on electricity, gas, telecommunications, video and water utility services, with  exemptions for residential services provided to persons with disabilities and low income households?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11225, "fingerprint": "2017|201700047|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700047|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "78af488151d1e004", "measure_id": "201700047", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve public safety, community programs and prevent significant cuts to essential services, by funding general City services including hiring additional police and fire personnel, maintaining anti-gang and graffiti efforts, youth and after-school parks and recreation services, expanding and improving City parks, fixing City streets and public infrastructure, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and financial oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1650, "no_votes": 2720, "total_votes": 4370, "percent_yes": 37.75743707093821, "percent_no": 62.24256292906179, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.655080", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.220881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.637502", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve public safety, community programs and prevent significant cuts to essential services, by funding general City services including hiring additional police and fire personnel, maintaining anti-gang and graffiti efforts, youth and after-school parks and recreation services, expanding and improving City parks, fixing City streets and public infrastructure, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and financial oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4156, "fingerprint": "2017|201700032|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700032|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "676ef9dfadbe8d73", "measure_id": "201700032", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending City laws related to the General Plan, including to: 1) impose a two-year moratorium on projects seeking General Plan amendments or zone or height-district changes resulting in more intense land use, an increase in density or height, or a loss of zoned open space, agricultural or industrial areas, with exceptions including for affordable housing projects and projects for which vested rights have accrued; 2) prohibit geographic amendments to the General Plan unless the affected area has significant social, economic or physical identity (defined as encompassing an entire community or district plan area, specific plan area, neighborhood council area or at least 15 acres); 3) require systematic, public review of the General Plan every five years; 4) prohibit project applicants from completing environmental impact reports for the City; 5) require the City make findings of General Plan consistency for planning amendments, project approvals and permit decisions; and 6) prohibit certain parking variances; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121101, "no_votes": 288012, "total_votes": 409113, "percent_yes": 29.6008682197828, "percent_no": 70.3991317802172, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.216715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.634598", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending City laws related to the General Plan, including to: 1) impose a two-year moratorium on projects seeking General Plan amendments or zone or height-district changes resulting in more intense land use, an increase in density or height, or a loss of zoned open space, agricultural or industrial areas, with exceptions including for affordable housing projects and projects for which vested rights have accrued; 2) prohibit geographic amendments to the General Plan unless the affected area has significant social, economic or physical identity (defined as encompassing an entire community or district plan area, specific plan area, neighborhood council area or at least 15 acres); 3) require systematic, public review of the General Plan every five years; 4) prohibit project applicants from completing environmental impact reports for the City; 5) require the City make findings of General Plan consistency for planning amendments, project approvals and permit decisions; and 6) prohibit certain parking variances; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4160, "fingerprint": "2017|201700036|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700036|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201700036", "measure_letter": "SF", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 953, "no_votes": 643, "total_votes": 1596, "percent_yes": 59.71177944862155, "percent_no": 40.28822055137845, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.217840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.635372", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11226, "fingerprint": "2017|201700048|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700048|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "85d78eb480facb93", "measure_id": "201700048", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the terms served by elected officials of the City of Montebello, including members of the City Council, the City Treasurer, and the City Clerk, be limited to not more than three (3) consecutive four (4) year terms, after which an elected official shall not be qualified to serve in that elected office for a period of four (4) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3652, "no_votes": 652, "total_votes": 4304, "percent_yes": 84.85130111524164, "percent_no": 15.14869888475836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.655265", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.221147", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.637695", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the terms served by elected officials of the City of Montebello, including members of the City Council, the City Treasurer, and the City Clerk, be limited to not more than three (3) consecutive four (4) year terms, after which an elected official shall not be qualified to serve in that elected office for a period of four (4) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4149, "fingerprint": "2017|201700025|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700025|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3c842a9eeffe2f8a", "measure_id": "201700025", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance, to permit the Council to levy generally on visitors to the City a maximum 12% tax on hotel/motel charges, estimated to annually raise $285,000 for general City purposes, including for law enforcement and street repairs, and without a sunset clause, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1136, "no_votes": 563, "total_votes": 1699, "percent_yes": 66.86286050618011, "percent_no": 33.13713949381989, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.214732", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.633234", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance, to permit the Council to levy generally on visitors to the City a maximum 12% tax on hotel/motel charges, estimated to annually raise $285,000 for general City purposes, including for law enforcement and street repairs, and without a sunset clause, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4171, "fingerprint": "2017|201700007|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700007|MADERA", "content_hash": "4eab2c20e1afc49f", "measure_id": "201700007", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Madera County enact a one percent public safety sales tax in the unincorporated area of the County to: Improve firefighting services throughout the county; Increase the number of paid and volunteer firefighters; Improve instructional and training services for volunteer firefighters; and, Increase the number of sheriff deputies; with annual public audits and citizen oversight for a period of twenty years and all funds controlled locally pursuant to Ordinance No. 683?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5268, "no_votes": 6526, "total_votes": 11794, "percent_yes": 44.66677971850093, "percent_no": 55.33322028149907, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.222945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.638868", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Madera County enact a one percent public safety sales tax in the unincorporated area of the County to: Improve firefighting services throughout the county; Increase the number of paid and volunteer firefighters; Improve instructional and training services for volunteer firefighters; and, Increase the number of sheriff deputies; with annual public audits and citizen oversight for a period of twenty years and all funds controlled locally pursuant to Ordinance No. 683?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11230, "fingerprint": "2017|201700102|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700102|MARIN", "content_hash": "4183b13a02a25428", "measure_id": "201700102", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Lagunitas School District maintain vital educational programs including basic educational programs, enrichment and support services for students, by levying a $535.00 assessment per assessor\u2019s parcel per year, with 6.5% yearly cost-of-living adjustment for 8 years, beginning July 1, 2018, exempting any single parcel used as a principal place of residence by any owner 65 years of age before February 1st of that year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1072, "no_votes": 422, "total_votes": 1494, "percent_yes": 71.75368139223562, "percent_no": 28.24631860776438, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.657228", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.224120", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.639652", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lagunitas School District maintain vital educational programs including basic educational programs, enrichment and support services for students, by levying a $535.00 assessment per assessor\u2019s parcel per year, with 6.5% yearly cost-of-living adjustment for 8 years, beginning July 1, 2018, exempting any single parcel used as a principal place of residence by any owner 65 years of age before February 1st of that year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4172, "fingerprint": "2017|201700008|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700008|MARIN", "content_hash": "3218fad06b5e3726", "measure_id": "201700008", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the special tax for maintenance and improvements to landscaped medians levied annually upon each improved parcel located within County Service Area #16 (Greenbrae), be increased from $150 per year to $300 per year per improved parcel within that area commencing with the 2017-2018 fiscal year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 495, "no_votes": 526, "total_votes": 1021, "percent_yes": 48.4818805093046, "percent_no": 51.5181194906954, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-05-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.223249", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.639062", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the special tax for maintenance and improvements to landscaped medians levied annually upon each improved parcel located within County Service Area #16 (Greenbrae), be increased from $150 per year to $300 per year per improved parcel within that area commencing with the 2017-2018 fiscal year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4173, "fingerprint": "2017|201700051|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700051|MARIN", "content_hash": "0cc074ced7de9fed", "measure_id": "201700051", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City services, including repairing aging, deteriorating neighborhood streets, roads, potholes, major boulevards; clearing brush to prevent fires/improve emergency vehicle access; upgrading storm drains; fire protection/911 emergency/medical response; and other services, shall the City of Larkspur extend the voter-approved sales tax at the 3/4\u00a2 rate until ended by voters, providing $1,650,000 annually with authority to incur debt to accelerate infrastructure projects, subject to citizens\u2019 oversight/audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1945, "no_votes": 976, "total_votes": 2921, "percent_yes": 66.58678534748374, "percent_no": 33.41321465251626, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.223524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.639255", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City services, including repairing aging, deteriorating neighborhood streets, roads, potholes, major boulevards; clearing brush to prevent fires/improve emergency vehicle access; upgrading storm drains; fire protection/911 emergency/medical response; and other services, shall the City of Larkspur extend the voter-approved sales tax at the 3/4\u00a2 rate until ended by voters, providing $1,650,000 annually with authority to incur debt to accelerate infrastructure projects, subject to citizens\u2019 oversight/audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4174, "fingerprint": "2017|201700052|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700052|MARIN", "content_hash": "e5701a5e3b8dcb17", "measure_id": "201700052", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Novato adopt an ordinance amending the General Plan to continue the Urban Growth Boundary to December 31, 2042 and adopting policies and programs relating thereto be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8933, "no_votes": 3150, "total_votes": 12083, "percent_yes": 73.93031531904329, "percent_no": 26.069684680956712, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.223800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.639461", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Novato adopt an ordinance amending the General Plan to continue the Urban Growth Boundary to December 31, 2042 and adopting policies and programs relating thereto be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4175, "fingerprint": "2017|201700009|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700009|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "181ef6b3b4d63f78", "measure_id": "201700009", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide funding for mental health care and facilities in Mendocino County to diagnose and treat mental illness and addiction, shall a transactions and use tax of one-half cent be enacted for five years, and thereafter reduced to one-eighth cent, with annual audits and a citizen's oversight committee to ensure funds are properly spent, and a requirement that funds cannot be taken by the State and spent for other purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15775, "no_votes": 3111, "total_votes": 18886, "percent_yes": 83.52748067351477, "percent_no": 16.472519326485227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.224397", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.639851", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for mental health care and facilities in Mendocino County to diagnose and treat mental illness and addiction, shall a transactions and use tax of one-half cent be enacted for five years, and thereafter reduced to one-eighth cent, with annual audits and a citizen's oversight committee to ensure funds are properly spent, and a requirement that funds cannot be taken by the State and spent for other purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4177, "fingerprint": "2017|201700053|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700053|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "ddfd589d2e91de00", "measure_id": "201700053", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall JOHN HUERTA, JR. be recalled(removed) from the office of City Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 866, "no_votes": 554, "total_votes": 1420, "percent_yes": 60.985915492957744, "percent_no": 39.014084507042256, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-01-24", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.224930", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.640241", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall JOHN HUERTA, JR. be recalled(removed) from the office of City Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4178, "fingerprint": "2017|201700054|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700054|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "dd085ca941d3902d", "measure_id": "201700054", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure fire and emergency medical services for our community, including the cost of qualified staff, capital replacement and reserves, shall a new parcel tax providing up to $770,000 initially, be adopted without expiration at up to $200 per single family unit, $150 per multi-unit, and $85 - $200 plus $.07 per building square foot for non- residential parcels, including an annual increase equal to the inflation index as established each year by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 648, "no_votes": 301, "total_votes": 949, "percent_yes": 68.28240252897787, "percent_no": 31.71759747102213, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-05-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.225193", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.640433", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure fire and emergency medical services for our community, including the cost of qualified staff, capital replacement and reserves, shall a new parcel tax providing up to $770,000 initially, be adopted without expiration at up to $200 per single family unit, $150 per multi-unit, and $85 - $200 plus $.07 per building square foot for non- residential parcels, including an annual increase equal to the inflation index as established each year by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4176, "fingerprint": "2017|201700010|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700010|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "04d4158d40aa0487", "measure_id": "201700010", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the East Garrison Community Services District have a directly elected Board of Directors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13, "no_votes": 288, "total_votes": 301, "percent_yes": 4.31893687707641, "percent_no": 95.68106312292359, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-08-29", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.224662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.640046", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the East Garrison Community Services District have a directly elected Board of Directors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4181, "fingerprint": "2017|201700103|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700103|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "aeb4da80d1e4a613", "measure_id": "201700103", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reopen and rebuild Moss Landing Middle School, constructing new campus classrooms, buildings and library, replacing infrastructure, providing technology for 21st century learning, hereby allowing the current middle school to reconvert to an elementary school relieving severe overcrowding at elementary schools, shall North Monterey County Unified School District be authorized to issue $36,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1390, "no_votes": 1790, "total_votes": 3180, "percent_yes": 43.710691823899374, "percent_no": 56.289308176100626, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.226178", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.641014", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reopen and rebuild Moss Landing Middle School, constructing new campus classrooms, buildings and library, replacing infrastructure, providing technology for 21st century learning, hereby allowing the current middle school to reconvert to an elementary school relieving severe overcrowding at elementary schools, shall North Monterey County Unified School District be authorized to issue $36,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4182, "fingerprint": "2017|201700104|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700104|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "5d6341293e7f15e5", "measure_id": "201700104", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade schools by replacing old portables with new classrooms, science labs, athletic facilities at reopened middle school, relieving overcrowding, reducing traffic congestion, increasing safety, repairing or replacing inefficient heating, plumbing, electrical systems; replacing, constructing and renovating schools, shall the North Monterey County Unified School District be authorized to issue $40,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1432, "no_votes": 1744, "total_votes": 3176, "percent_yes": 45.08816120906801, "percent_no": 54.91183879093199, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.226444", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.641213", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade schools by replacing old portables with new classrooms, science labs, athletic facilities at reopened middle school, relieving overcrowding, reducing traffic congestion, increasing safety, repairing or replacing inefficient heating, plumbing, electrical systems; replacing, constructing and renovating schools, shall the North Monterey County Unified School District be authorized to issue $40,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4179, "fingerprint": "2017|201700055|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700055|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "ce71f7266c35d537", "measure_id": "201700055", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To generate an estimated $300,000 annually until ended by voters to maintain essential City services such as 9-1-1 emergency response, anti-drug/anti-gang programs; repairing streets, potholes, storm drains; earthquake, flood preparedness; improving parks, youth/senior programs; and other general services; with required independent audits and all funds staying in Seaside, shall the ordinance levying an ongoing tax of up to 10% of gross receipts of marijuana businesses be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1810, "no_votes": 409, "total_votes": 2219, "percent_yes": 81.56827399729607, "percent_no": 18.431726002703925, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.225457", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.640625", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To generate an estimated $300,000 annually until ended by voters to maintain essential City services such as 9-1-1 emergency response, anti-drug/anti-gang programs; repairing streets, potholes, storm drains; earthquake, flood preparedness; improving parks, youth/senior programs; and other general services; with required independent audits and all funds staying in Seaside, shall the ordinance levying an ongoing tax of up to 10% of gross receipts of marijuana businesses be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4180, "fingerprint": "2017|201700056|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700056|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "156d39bc70ca524e", "measure_id": "201700056", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To generate an estimated $1,900,000 annually until ended by voters to maintain essential City services such as police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response; hiring police officers/firefighters; youth violence prevention programs; improving street maintenance, water cleanliness, earthquake, flood preparedness, parks, beaches, youth/senior programs, and other general services; with required independent audits and all funds staying in Seaside; shall the ordinance increasing the City's sales tax by 1/2 cent be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1403, "no_votes": 822, "total_votes": 2225, "percent_yes": 63.056179775280896, "percent_no": 36.943820224719104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.225906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.640816", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To generate an estimated $1,900,000 annually until ended by voters to maintain essential City services such as police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response; hiring police officers/firefighters; youth violence prevention programs; improving street maintenance, water cleanliness, earthquake, flood preparedness, parks, beaches, youth/senior programs, and other general services; with required independent audits and all funds staying in Seaside; shall the ordinance increasing the City's sales tax by 1/2 cent be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4183, "fingerprint": "2017|201700011|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700011|NEVADA", "content_hash": "b6360ecb37b33cc8", "measure_id": "201700011", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution 2016-03 be approved establishing a special tax on each parcel of land within the District in the amount of $200.00 per year, beginning with the 2017-18 fiscal year, and $250.00 per year beginning with the 2021-22 fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter, for the purpose of funding road maintenance programs within the District, and further establish a spending limit in accordance with the provisions of Ariticle XIIIB of the California Constitution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71, "no_votes": 13, "total_votes": 84, "percent_yes": 84.52380952380952, "percent_no": 15.476190476190482, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.226711", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.641407", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution 2016-03 be approved establishing a special tax on each parcel of land within the District in the amount of $200.00 per year, beginning with the 2017-18 fiscal year, and $250.00 per year beginning with the 2021-22 fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter, for the purpose of funding road maintenance programs within the District, and further establish a spending limit in accordance with the provisions of Ariticle XIIIB of the California Constitution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4184, "fingerprint": "2017|201700057|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700057|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "9c636b0f1a01355e", "measure_id": "201700057", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Upon a 2/3 vote of approval shall the City of Portola be authorized and empowered to adopt Ordinance No. 345 establishing an annual special tax, for each parcel of real property within the City, to be collected and apportioned along with the County property taxes, without expiration commencing July 1, 2017, with an annual cost of living adjustment, to be used for providing and enhancing necessary fire protection, prevention and suppression services, emergency medical and rescue services and hazardous material emergency response services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 151, "no_votes": 274, "total_votes": 425, "percent_yes": 35.529411764705884, "percent_no": 64.47058823529412, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.227031", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.641601", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Upon a 2/3 vote of approval shall the City of Portola be authorized and empowered to adopt Ordinance No. 345 establishing an annual special tax, for each parcel of real property within the City, to be collected and apportioned along with the County property taxes, without expiration commencing July 1, 2017, with an annual cost of living adjustment, to be used for providing and enhancing necessary fire protection, prevention and suppression services, emergency medical and rescue services and hazardous material emergency response services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4185, "fingerprint": "2017|201700058|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700058|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4b49c253e6b7f510", "measure_id": "201700058", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Ordinance Initiative Measure Revising the Alberhill Villages Specific Plan Governing the Future Development of Approximately 1,400 Acres Located in Northwest Lake Elsinore, South of Interstate 15 and West of Lake Street be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 451, "no_votes": 3378, "total_votes": 3829, "percent_yes": 11.77853225385218, "percent_no": 88.22146774614782, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-05-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.227298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.641800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Ordinance Initiative Measure Revising the Alberhill Villages Specific Plan Governing the Future Development of Approximately 1,400 Acres Located in Northwest Lake Elsinore, South of Interstate 15 and West of Lake Street be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4186, "fingerprint": "2017|201700059|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700059|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "81e7f5218247d26c", "measure_id": "201700059", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance preventing public safety service cuts to police/emergency response times, anti-gang/anti-drug, youth violence and sex offender/parolee programs, extending existing, voter-approved public safety measure at a reduced rate of $103 per single family residence, providing approximately $2,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits, with all funds for local public safety, and a tax decrease for these parcels, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1672, "no_votes": 552, "total_votes": 2224, "percent_yes": 75.17985611510791, "percent_no": 24.82014388489209, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.227734", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.641992", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance preventing public safety service cuts to police/emergency response times, anti-gang/anti-drug, youth violence and sex offender/parolee programs, extending existing, voter-approved public safety measure at a reduced rate of $103 per single family residence, providing approximately $2,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits, with all funds for local public safety, and a tax decrease for these parcels, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4187, "fingerprint": "2017|201700060|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700060|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c83dfe5882e6ecff", "measure_id": "201700060", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance to increase police training, recruitment/retention and crime investigation/prevention; maintain rapid police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response times; and to hire additional police officers to patrol streets, extending its existing, voter-approved utility users\u2019 tax, producing approximately $2,831,543 annually, until ended by voters, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and requiring all funds for local public safety services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1692, "no_votes": 535, "total_votes": 2227, "percent_yes": 75.97665020206556, "percent_no": 24.023349797934443, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.228135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.642183", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance to increase police training, recruitment/retention and crime investigation/prevention; maintain rapid police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response times; and to hire additional police officers to patrol streets, extending its existing, voter-approved utility users\u2019 tax, producing approximately $2,831,543 annually, until ended by voters, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and requiring all funds for local public safety services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4188, "fingerprint": "2017|201700061|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700061|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "06eae8dd6f35f505", "measure_id": "201700061", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential city services, including rapid 911 emergency response, fire/police protection, add paramedic services, keep fire stations open/staffed, address homelessness, repair local streets/pothales, improve rapid response to assault, burglaries/crimes, keep public areas safe/clean, maintain senior services, attract/retain jobs/business, increase water conservation; shall the City of Palm Springs establish a 1/2 cent sales tax; requiring annual independent audits/public oversight; all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6849, "no_votes": 5289, "total_votes": 12138, "percent_yes": 56.42609985170539, "percent_no": 43.57390014829461, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.228420", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.642387", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential city services, including rapid 911 emergency response, fire/police protection, add paramedic services, keep fire stations open/staffed, address homelessness, repair local streets/pothales, improve rapid response to assault, burglaries/crimes, keep public areas safe/clean, maintain senior services, attract/retain jobs/business, increase water conservation; shall the City of Palm Springs establish a 1/2 cent sales tax; requiring annual independent audits/public oversight; all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4189, "fingerprint": "2017|201700062|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700062|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "988e344e205ce15e", "measure_id": "201700062", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Palm Springs update the existing gross receipts tax on medical cannabis collectives and cooperatives to apply to all medical and adult-use cannabis businesses, apart from cultivation businesses, which will be taxed at a rate up to 10 dollars per square foot, with all revenue used in Palm Springs to maintain and improve essential city services, including public safety and youth drug prevention education; requiring annual independent audits and public oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9357, "no_votes": 2581, "total_votes": 11938, "percent_yes": 78.37996314290501, "percent_no": 21.620036857094988, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.228824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.642579", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Palm Springs update the existing gross receipts tax on medical cannabis collectives and cooperatives to apply to all medical and adult-use cannabis businesses, apart from cultivation businesses, which will be taxed at a rate up to 10 dollars per square foot, with all revenue used in Palm Springs to maintain and improve essential city services, including public safety and youth drug prevention education; requiring annual independent audits and public oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4190, "fingerprint": "2017|201700063|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700063|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e67d05b286e7aedc", "measure_id": "201700063", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance known as the SALE OF THE CITY OF PERRIS DOWNTOWN SEWER SYSTEM, authorizing the City of Perris to sell the Downtown Perris Sewer System to retire Water System debt and use the remaining proceeds for park amenities, including athletic fields, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1216, "no_votes": 817, "total_votes": 2033, "percent_yes": 59.813084112149525, "percent_no": 40.186915887850475, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.229155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.642773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance known as the SALE OF THE CITY OF PERRIS DOWNTOWN SEWER SYSTEM, authorizing the City of Perris to sell the Downtown Perris Sewer System to retire Water System debt and use the remaining proceeds for park amenities, including athletic fields, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4191, "fingerprint": "2017|201700064|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700064|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "dd524c94512dfe30", "measure_id": "201700064", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the resolution known as the SALE OF THE CITY OLF PERRIS NORTH PERRIS WATER SYSTEM AND DOWNTOWN PERRIS WATER SYSTEM, which will authorize the City of Perris to sell the North Perris Water System and Downtown Water System to Liberty Utilities to retire Water System debt and use the remaining proceeds for park amenities, including athletic fields, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1326, "no_votes": 769, "total_votes": 2095, "percent_yes": 63.29355608591886, "percent_no": 36.70644391408114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.229425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.642963", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the resolution known as the SALE OF THE CITY OLF PERRIS NORTH PERRIS WATER SYSTEM AND DOWNTOWN PERRIS WATER SYSTEM, which will authorize the City of Perris to sell the North Perris Water System and Downtown Water System to Liberty Utilities to retire Water System debt and use the remaining proceeds for park amenities, including athletic fields, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4192, "fingerprint": "2017|201700012|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700012|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "456ab090c87049dd", "measure_id": "201700012", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on July 20, 2016, by the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County ordering the reorganization to include formation of the Wrightwood Community Services District and Dissolution of County Service Area 56, known as LAFCO 3202, be approved subject to the terms and conditions as more particularly described in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 573, "no_votes": 337, "total_votes": 910, "percent_yes": 62.96703296703296, "percent_no": 37.03296703296704, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.229699", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.643154", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on July 20, 2016, by the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County ordering the reorganization to include formation of the Wrightwood Community Services District and Dissolution of County Service Area 56, known as LAFCO 3202, be approved subject to the terms and conditions as more particularly described in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4194, "fingerprint": "2017|201700066|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700066|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "99d82e09e517cfc0", "measure_id": "201700066", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "An ordinance repealing Chapter 9.48 of the City of Upland Municipal Code and replacing it with a new Chapter 9.48 prohibiting marijuana-related uses and activities in the city. Shall the voters of the City of Upland adopt an ordinance prohibiting marijuana-related uses and activities in the city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7562, "no_votes": 2805, "total_votes": 10367, "percent_yes": 72.94299218674641, "percent_no": 27.05700781325359, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.230313", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.643609", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "An ordinance repealing Chapter 9.48 of the City of Upland Municipal Code and replacing it with a new Chapter 9.48 prohibiting marijuana-related uses and activities in the city. Shall the voters of the City of Upland adopt an ordinance prohibiting marijuana-related uses and activities in the city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4193, "fingerprint": "2017|201700065|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700065|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3e68ee8af181ff91", "measure_id": "201700065", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Apple Valley be authorized to finance the acquisition of the Apple Valley water system, currently owned and operated by Liberty Utilities, including related expenses, by incurring debt in the maximum amount of $150,000,000, provided that the debt is repaid from revenues generated by the water system, and not from taxes, and further that the Town conducts an annual independent audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7200, "no_votes": 5238, "total_votes": 12438, "percent_yes": 57.88712011577424, "percent_no": 42.11287988422576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.229969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.643349", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Apple Valley be authorized to finance the acquisition of the Apple Valley water system, currently owned and operated by Liberty Utilities, including related expenses, by incurring debt in the maximum amount of $150,000,000, provided that the debt is repaid from revenues generated by the water system, and not from taxes, and further that the Town conducts an annual independent audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4195, "fingerprint": "2017|201700067|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700067|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "239c2b858fb7ca66", "measure_id": "201700067", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2017-004, entitled \u201cAn Ordinance of the People of the City of Chino, California, to Enact Section No. 20.15.160 of the Chino Municipal Code Converting 29.7 Acres From the General Plan Designation of RD 1 to RD 4.5, RD 8, and RD 12 Generally Located Between Vernon Avenue and Benson Avenue, South of Adams Street, and North of the Chino Promenade Shopping Center and rezoning the same from an RD 1 designation to RD 4.5, RD 8, RD 12 designations\u201d be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1262, "no_votes": 6695, "total_votes": 7957, "percent_yes": 15.86024883750157, "percent_no": 84.13975116249843, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-07-11", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.230593", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.643806", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2017-004, entitled \u201cAn Ordinance of the People of the City of Chino, California, to Enact Section No. 20.15.160 of the Chino Municipal Code Converting 29.7 Acres From the General Plan Designation of RD 1 to RD 4.5, RD 8, and RD 12 Generally Located Between Vernon Avenue and Benson Avenue, South of Adams Street, and North of the Chino Promenade Shopping Center and rezoning the same from an RD 1 designation to RD 4.5, RD 8, RD 12 designations\u201d be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4196, "fingerprint": "2017|201700068|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700068|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "17d8ff0c10a20ae2", "measure_id": "201700068", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide long-term sustainability, adequate resources for emergency response, and more equitably spread the cost of Barstow Fire Protection District\u2019s services across the population it serves, including 60,000,000 annual nonresident travelers who consume taxable goods and services in Barstow, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the sales tax by one-half of one percent, providing $3.8 million dollars annually, expiring if the Barstow Fire Protection District is transferred to an agency outside the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1342, "no_votes": 715, "total_votes": 2057, "percent_yes": 65.24064171122996, "percent_no": 34.759358288770045, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.230868", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.644001", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide long-term sustainability, adequate resources for emergency response, and more equitably spread the cost of Barstow Fire Protection District\u2019s services across the population it serves, including 60,000,000 annual nonresident travelers who consume taxable goods and services in Barstow, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the sales tax by one-half of one percent, providing $3.8 million dollars annually, expiring if the Barstow Fire Protection District is transferred to an agency outside the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4197, "fingerprint": "2017|201700069|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700069|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a9d09ae9a26c33bf", "measure_id": "201700069", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address crime issues, respond quickly to fires and medical emergencies, and make Victorville safer by adding 10 new police and 15 new firefighter/paramedics, shall Ordinance No. 2371 be adopted to impose a one-half percent (0.5%) transactions and use (\u201csales\u201d) tax, estimated to raise $8.5 million annually, with all funds restricted to use on public safety services within Victorville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3859, "no_votes": 2397, "total_votes": 6256, "percent_yes": 61.684782608695656, "percent_no": 38.315217391304344, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.231148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.644192", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address crime issues, respond quickly to fires and medical emergencies, and make Victorville safer by adding 10 new police and 15 new firefighter/paramedics, shall Ordinance No. 2371 be adopted to impose a one-half percent (0.5%) transactions and use (\u201csales\u201d) tax, estimated to raise $8.5 million annually, with all funds restricted to use on public safety services within Victorville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4198, "fingerprint": "2017|201700070|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700070|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "dc26d9a46bdd36c8", "measure_id": "201700070", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance changing the General Plan and Zoning Land Use Map to redesignate a portion of the Stoneridge Country Club from Open Space-Recreation to Residential Condominium with the Stoneridge Overlay Zone to allow for the development of not more than 180 residential condominium units for residents over the age of 55 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4486, "no_votes": 7603, "total_votes": 12089, "percent_yes": 37.108114815121176, "percent_no": 62.891885184878824, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.231423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.644386", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance changing the General Plan and Zoning Land Use Map to redesignate a portion of the Stoneridge Country Club from Open Space-Recreation to Residential Condominium with the Stoneridge Overlay Zone to allow for the development of not more than 180 residential condominium units for residents over the age of 55 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4199, "fingerprint": "2017|201700071|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700071|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "f8136f0f0d133c16", "measure_id": "201700071", "measure_letter": "B-17", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted to replace former Chapter 15.10 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, entitled \"Rental Housing Inspection\" (repealed by City Council Ordinance 1632, effective April 20, 2017), with new Chapter 15.10 to be entitled \"Non-Discrimination in Housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2462, "no_votes": 5849, "total_votes": 8311, "percent_yes": 29.62339068704127, "percent_no": 70.37660931295873, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-08-22", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.231780", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.644568", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted to replace former Chapter 15.10 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, entitled \"Rental Housing Inspection\" (repealed by City Council Ordinance 1632, effective April 20, 2017), with new Chapter 15.10 to be entitled \"Non-Discrimination in Housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4200, "fingerprint": "2017|201700072|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700072|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5ca3125652f0c748", "measure_id": "201700072", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Town of Atherton supplement private donations with available non-dedicated General Funds to meet the funding shortfall, where one exists, for construction of the new Town Center?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1182, "no_votes": 743, "total_votes": 1925, "percent_yes": 61.4025974025974, "percent_no": 38.5974025974026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.232052", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.644747", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Town of Atherton supplement private donations with available non-dedicated General Funds to meet the funding shortfall, where one exists, for construction of the new Town Center?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4207, "fingerprint": "2017|201700079|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700079|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "3d610a146ea7f4b8", "measure_id": "201700079", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To conform with state law, shall the Charter amendment changing the timing of the city's general municipal elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years, and extending the terms of the council members elected in 2015 and 2017 for a period of one year, respectively, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9726, "no_votes": 2219, "total_votes": 11945, "percent_yes": 81.4231896190875, "percent_no": 18.576810380912505, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.234006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.646019", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To conform with state law, shall the Charter amendment changing the timing of the city's general municipal elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years, and extending the terms of the council members elected in 2015 and 2017 for a period of one year, respectively, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4205, "fingerprint": "2017|201700077|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700077|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "dda98383b050d30d", "measure_id": "201700077", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance entitled Pacifica Community Preservation, Rent Stabilization, and Renters' Rights Act which protects certain tenants of multi-family housing from excessive rent increases and no-fault evictions and ensures that Landlords receive a fair and reasonable rate of return on their investment, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4354, "no_votes": 6640, "total_votes": 10994, "percent_yes": 39.60342004729852, "percent_no": 60.39657995270148, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.233386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.645652", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance entitled Pacifica Community Preservation, Rent Stabilization, and Renters' Rights Act which protects certain tenants of multi-family housing from excessive rent increases and no-fault evictions and ensures that Landlords receive a fair and reasonable rate of return on their investment, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4202, "fingerprint": "2017|201700074|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700074|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5f665cb42cb1fc8c", "measure_id": "201700074", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City impose an annual business license tax on a soil recycling establishment of up to twenty (20%) of its gross receipts or up to two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000), whichever is greater?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 831, "no_votes": 275, "total_votes": 1106, "percent_yes": 75.13562386980108, "percent_no": 24.86437613019892, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.232588", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.645108", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City impose an annual business license tax on a soil recycling establishment of up to twenty (20%) of its gross receipts or up to two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000), whichever is greater?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4203, "fingerprint": "2017|201700075|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700075|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "247b38ce2d25201c", "measure_id": "201700075", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City increase the annual business license tax for certain recycling establishments up to $4,000,000 (plus adjustments) per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 877, "no_votes": 225, "total_votes": 1102, "percent_yes": 79.58257713248639, "percent_no": 20.417422867513608, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.232855", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.645286", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City increase the annual business license tax for certain recycling establishments up to $4,000,000 (plus adjustments) per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4201, "fingerprint": "2017|201700073|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700073|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "93c1be9e52cc6794", "measure_id": "201700073", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue providing funding to maintain neighborhood police patrols and the Town's ability to respond to emergencies, repairing and maintaining streets, and repairing and constructing storm drains, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue a Special Parcel Tax for three years and allowing for the expenditure of funds derived from such tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 981, "no_votes": 884, "total_votes": 1865, "percent_yes": 52.60053619302949, "percent_no": 47.39946380697051, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.232320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.644929", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue providing funding to maintain neighborhood police patrols and the Town's ability to respond to emergencies, repairing and maintaining streets, and repairing and constructing storm drains, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue a Special Parcel Tax for three years and allowing for the expenditure of funds derived from such tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4206, "fingerprint": "2017|201700078|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700078|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "1269e9fccbc8b9f8", "measure_id": "201700078", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance establishing a Marijuana Operations Tax at the rate of 6% of a Marijuana Operation's gross receipts, which may be decreased or increased after two years to a maximum of 10% by the City Council, to help fund municipal services, including police and fire protection services, emergency medical services, park, recreation, and street maintenance services, with no sunset date and estimated to generate $360,000 annually in tax revenue, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8588, "no_votes": 2316, "total_votes": 10904, "percent_yes": 78.76008804108584, "percent_no": 21.239911958914163, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.233740", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.645839", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance establishing a Marijuana Operations Tax at the rate of 6% of a Marijuana Operation's gross receipts, which may be decreased or increased after two years to a maximum of 10% by the City Council, to help fund municipal services, including police and fire protection services, emergency medical services, park, recreation, and street maintenance services, with no sunset date and estimated to generate $360,000 annually in tax revenue, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4208, "fingerprint": "2017|201700080|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700080|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "578df38333cf4ef7", "measure_id": "201700080", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the charter amendment revising the City of San Mateo's charter to: allow for regular council meetings to be held at locations other than City Hall, when necessary; updating the title of Personnel Director to Human Resources Director; and revising the Fiscal Administration provisions to conform with state law and current practices be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9774, "no_votes": 2167, "total_votes": 11941, "percent_yes": 81.85244116908132, "percent_no": 18.147558830918683, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.234272", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.646197", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the charter amendment revising the City of San Mateo's charter to: allow for regular council meetings to be held at locations other than City Hall, when necessary; updating the title of Personnel Director to Human Resources Director; and revising the Fiscal Administration provisions to conform with state law and current practices be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4204, "fingerprint": "2017|201700076|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700076|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b284a28060417834", "measure_id": "201700076", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain/improve Burlingame's quality of life, including essential City facilities and services such as maintaining city streets, sidewalks and potholes; enhancing neighborhood police patrols/crime prevention programs, maintaining recreation programs and safe facilities for youth/teens; and other essential city services, shall the City of Burlingame enact an ongoing, 1/4 cent sales tax with authority to incur debt to accelerate infrastructure projects, providing $2,000,000 annually, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, and all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3396, "no_votes": 1977, "total_votes": 5373, "percent_yes": 63.20491345616974, "percent_no": 36.79508654383026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.233121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.645467", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/improve Burlingame's quality of life, including essential City facilities and services such as maintaining city streets, sidewalks and potholes; enhancing neighborhood police patrols/crime prevention programs, maintaining recreation programs and safe facilities for youth/teens; and other essential city services, shall the City of Burlingame enact an ongoing, 1/4 cent sales tax with authority to incur debt to accelerate infrastructure projects, providing $2,000,000 annually, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, and all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4209, "fingerprint": "2017|201700105|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700105|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ff23875d2b6da5bd", "measure_id": "201700105", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect outstanding public schools; retain high-quality teachers, excellent programs, and reasonable class size; avoid teacher layoffs; and sustain property values, shall the Menlo Park City School District replace its expiring parcel tax at the new rate of $360 expiring after seven years, adjusted annually for inflation, raising $2.83 million annually to be spent only on teachers and essential educational programs at Encinal, Laurel, Oak Knoll, and Hillview schools with independent oversight, annual audit, and senior exemption?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5858, "no_votes": 1548, "total_votes": 7406, "percent_yes": 79.09802862543883, "percent_no": 20.90197137456117, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.234539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.646377", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect outstanding public schools; retain high-quality teachers, excellent programs, and reasonable class size; avoid teacher layoffs; and sustain property values, shall the Menlo Park City School District replace its expiring parcel tax at the new rate of $360 expiring after seven years, adjusted annually for inflation, raising $2.83 million annually to be spent only on teachers and essential educational programs at Encinal, Laurel, Oak Knoll, and Hillview schools with independent oversight, annual audit, and senior exemption?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4210, "fingerprint": "2017|201700106|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700106|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e425648861801a62", "measure_id": "201700106", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect local schools from substantial program cuts by renewing local funding that cannot be taken by the State, protect math/science/reading/writing programs, attract/retain qualified teachers/educational staff, keep school libraries open and support art/drama/music programs, shall San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District renew without increasing, its expiring voter approved education tax at $209.92 per parcel annually for 9 years, with CPI adjustments, senior exemptions, annual audits, and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13039, "no_votes": 6951, "total_votes": 19990, "percent_yes": 65.22761380690345, "percent_no": 34.77238619309655, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-28", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.234815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.646560", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect local schools from substantial program cuts by renewing local funding that cannot be taken by the State, protect math/science/reading/writing programs, attract/retain qualified teachers/educational staff, keep school libraries open and support art/drama/music programs, shall San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District renew without increasing, its expiring voter approved education tax at $209.92 per parcel annually for 9 years, with CPI adjustments, senior exemptions, annual audits, and citizens\u2019 oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4211, "fingerprint": "2017|201700107|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700107|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "47669d890d46104b", "measure_id": "201700107", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and enhance academic excellence at Woodside School through emphasis on quality instruction, especially in math, science, reading and writing, attracting/ retaining outstanding teachers/ maintaining small class sizes, shall the Woodside Elementary School District extend its existing annual school tax without increasing the current rate of $290.00 per parcel each year for eight years, adjusted annually, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, an exemption for those 65 years and older, and all funds spent only in Woodside School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 844, "no_votes": 313, "total_votes": 1157, "percent_yes": 72.94727744165947, "percent_no": 27.052722558340534, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-04-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.235090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.646750", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and enhance academic excellence at Woodside School through emphasis on quality instruction, especially in math, science, reading and writing, attracting/ retaining outstanding teachers/ maintaining small class sizes, shall the Woodside Elementary School District extend its existing annual school tax without increasing the current rate of $290.00 per parcel each year for eight years, adjusted annually, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, an exemption for those 65 years and older, and all funds spent only in Woodside School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4212, "fingerprint": "2017|201700081|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700081|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "fd332178dd0063d4", "measure_id": "201700081", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential services and repair critical infrastructure including:  Police, fire, and 911 emergency medical response; local streets, potholes, bridges and storm drains; neighborhood f re stations/public safety infrastructure; parks, youth/senior services; address homelessness; help retain local businesses; support other general services; shall the City of Santa Barbara enact a one-cent sales tax providing approximately 22 million dollars annually unless ended by voters; requiring audits, citizens oversight, public disclosure of spending, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13501, "no_votes": 10558, "total_votes": 24059, "percent_yes": 56.11621430649652, "percent_no": 43.88378569350348, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.235422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.646942", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential services and repair critical infrastructure including:  Police, fire, and 911 emergency medical response; local streets, potholes, bridges and storm drains; neighborhood f re stations/public safety infrastructure; parks, youth/senior services; address homelessness; help retain local businesses; support other general services; shall the City of Santa Barbara enact a one-cent sales tax providing approximately 22 million dollars annually unless ended by voters; requiring audits, citizens oversight, public disclosure of spending, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11232, "fingerprint": "2017|201700109|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700109|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9af69b9380d88bfc", "measure_id": "201700109", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain outstanding academic programs including: science, engineering, math, reading, writing, music and arts with local funding that cannot be taken by the State; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; provide safe and modern facilities for student success; shall Los Gatos Union School District authorize an annual $290 school parcel tax for 8 years, raising approximately $2,800,000 annually, with independent oversight, no funds for administrators, an exemption available for seniors and all funds benefiting local elementary and middle schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4877, "no_votes": 2553, "total_votes": 7430, "percent_yes": 65.6393001345895, "percent_no": 34.360699865410496, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-05-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.665409", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.236868", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.647859", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain outstanding academic programs including: science, engineering, math, reading, writing, music and arts with local funding that cannot be taken by the State; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; provide safe and modern facilities for student success; shall Los Gatos Union School District authorize an annual $290 school parcel tax for 8 years, raising approximately $2,800,000 annually, with independent oversight, no funds for administrators, an exemption available for seniors and all funds benefiting local elementary and middle schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11231, "fingerprint": "2017|201700108|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700108|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f2c3629c8c79a8a0", "measure_id": "201700108", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve high quality academic programs for elementary and middle school students, attract/retain high quality teachers, keep instructional programs up to date, and provide a safe, well maintained learning environment in our mountain community, shall the Lakeside Joint School District levy a temporary 8-year education parcel tax of $647, with citizens\u2019 oversight, exemptions available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, every dollar spent on Lakeside students and cannot be taken away by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 182, "no_votes": 62, "total_votes": 244, "percent_yes": 74.59016393442623, "percent_no": 25.40983606557377, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.665214", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.236577", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.647668", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve high quality academic programs for elementary and middle school students, attract/retain high quality teachers, keep instructional programs up to date, and provide a safe, well maintained learning environment in our mountain community, shall the Lakeside Joint School District levy a temporary 8-year education parcel tax of $647, with citizens\u2019 oversight, exemptions available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, every dollar spent on Lakeside students and cannot be taken away by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4213, "fingerprint": "2017|201700082|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700082|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "de18bc65a718f4a6", "measure_id": "201700082", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance levying a business license tax on marijuana businesses at the initial rate of 7% and a maximum rate of 15% of the gross receipts of the marijuana business be adopted to continue until repealed by the City Council or City voters, which is estimated to raise $130,000 - $260,000 annually for general City services, such as police, fire and code enforcement services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5582, "no_votes": 1023, "total_votes": 6605, "percent_yes": 84.5117335352006, "percent_no": 15.488266464799395, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-04-25", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.235695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.647123", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance levying a business license tax on marijuana businesses at the initial rate of 7% and a maximum rate of 15% of the gross receipts of the marijuana business be adopted to continue until repealed by the City Council or City voters, which is estimated to raise $130,000 - $260,000 annually for general City services, such as police, fire and code enforcement services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11233, "fingerprint": "2017|201700110|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700110|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d29c5d0b2d727779", "measure_id": "201700110", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue local school funding, support struggling students, offer competitive compensation to attract and retain the best teachers; maintain small class sizes; enhance hands-on science, technology, math and engineering programs; maintain outstanding music and art education; and support core academics, shall Mountain View Whisman School District levy a tax of $191 per parcel \u2013 an increase of $64 for most homeowners \u2013 for 8 years, generating $2,800,000 annually, with independent oversight, exemptions for seniors and funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7409, "no_votes": 2886, "total_votes": 10295, "percent_yes": 71.9669742593492, "percent_no": 28.0330257406508, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-05-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.665594", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.237143", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.648039", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue local school funding, support struggling students, offer competitive compensation to attract and retain the best teachers; maintain small class sizes; enhance hands-on science, technology, math and engineering programs; maintain outstanding music and art education; and support core academics, shall Mountain View Whisman School District levy a tax of $191 per parcel \u2013 an increase of $64 for most homeowners \u2013 for 8 years, generating $2,800,000 annually, with independent oversight, exemptions for seniors and funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4214, "fingerprint": "2017|201700083|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700083|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1332cd58dfd7e3b3", "measure_id": "201700083", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance allowing the City to license up to three medical marijuana dispensaries in Campbell, which would also be allowed to deliver medical marijuana to qualified patients throughout the City, and that would allow every qualified patient and primary caregiver to cultivate up to 100 square feet or 500 square feet of marijuana, respectively, without a license be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2398, "no_votes": 4175, "total_votes": 6573, "percent_yes": 36.4825802525483, "percent_no": 63.5174197474517, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-04-25", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.235960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.647307", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance allowing the City to license up to three medical marijuana dispensaries in Campbell, which would also be allowed to deliver medical marijuana to qualified patients throughout the City, and that would allow every qualified patient and primary caregiver to cultivate up to 100 square feet or 500 square feet of marijuana, respectively, without a license be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4215, "fingerprint": "2017|201700084|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700084|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8082d956d9271a89", "measure_id": "201700084", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance imposing a moratorium on marijuana dispensaries in Campbell until at least April 1, 2019 be adopted, allowing time for study of traffic, neighborhood and safety issues, and providing the City Council discretion to allow for dispensaries after that date, provided that the dispensaries be at least 100 feet from residential properties and 600 feet from child care facilities, schools, parks and community centers, and other dispensaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4122, "no_votes": 2411, "total_votes": 6533, "percent_yes": 63.095055870197456, "percent_no": 36.904944129802544, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-04-25", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.236226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.647488", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance imposing a moratorium on marijuana dispensaries in Campbell until at least April 1, 2019 be adopted, allowing time for study of traffic, neighborhood and safety issues, and providing the City Council discretion to allow for dispensaries after that date, provided that the dispensaries be at least 100 feet from residential properties and 600 feet from child care facilities, schools, parks and community centers, and other dispensaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4216, "fingerprint": "2017|201700111|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700111|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "f2c3629c8c79a8a0", "measure_id": "201700111", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve high quality academic programs for elementary and middle school students, attract/retain high quality teachers, keep instructional programs up to date, and provide a safe, well maintained learning environment in our mountain community, shall the Lakeside Joint School District levy a temporary 8-year education parcel tax of $647, with citizens\u2019 oversight, exemptions available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, every dollar spent on Lakeside students and cannot be taken away by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 360, "no_votes": 152, "total_votes": 512, "percent_yes": 70.3125, "percent_no": 29.6875, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.237419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.648230", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve high quality academic programs for elementary and middle school students, attract/retain high quality teachers, keep instructional programs up to date, and provide a safe, well maintained learning environment in our mountain community, shall the Lakeside Joint School District levy a temporary 8-year education parcel tax of $647, with citizens\u2019 oversight, exemptions available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, every dollar spent on Lakeside students and cannot be taken away by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4217, "fingerprint": "2017|201700085|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700085|SHASTA", "content_hash": "31cd0ea1e88130a5", "measure_id": "201700085", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a cannabis business tax on cultivation up to $26 per square foot, on manufacturing up to $25 per square foot, and on other cannabis businesses up to 12% gross receipts to provide funding for local law enforcement/code enforcement within the City of Shasta Lake?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1240, "no_votes": 325, "total_votes": 1565, "percent_yes": 79.2332268370607, "percent_no": 20.7667731629393, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-08-29", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.237690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.648420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a cannabis business tax on cultivation up to $26 per square foot, on manufacturing up to $25 per square foot, and on other cannabis businesses up to 12% gross receipts to provide funding for local law enforcement/code enforcement within the City of Shasta Lake?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4218, "fingerprint": "2017|201700013|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700013|SONOMA", "content_hash": "091af6ab50c1fd09", "measure_id": "201700013", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a cannabis business tax in unincorporated Sonoma County on cultivation up to $38 per square foot (annually adjusted by CPI increases) or 10% on gross receipts, and on other cannabis businesses up to 10% on gross receipts, to fund essential county services such as addressing industry impacts, public safety, fire, health, housing, roads, and environmental protection, with funds staying local and subject to audits, generating undetermined revenue until repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64177, "no_votes": 26219, "total_votes": 90396, "percent_yes": 70.99539802646134, "percent_no": 29.004601973538655, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-03-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.237956", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.648606", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a cannabis business tax in unincorporated Sonoma County on cultivation up to $38 per square foot (annually adjusted by CPI increases) or 10% on gross receipts, and on other cannabis businesses up to 10% on gross receipts, to fund essential county services such as addressing industry impacts, public safety, fire, health, housing, roads, and environmental protection, with funds staying local and subject to audits, generating undetermined revenue until repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4219, "fingerprint": "2017|201700086|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700086|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a228fc962d562a28", "measure_id": "201700086", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall those provisions of the City of Santa Rosa Residential Rent Stabilization and Other Tenant Protections Ordinance that establish rent control for certain residential rental properties, prohibit landlords from evicting tenants of certain properties except for specified reasons, and provide other protections to tenants, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16382, "no_votes": 17163, "total_votes": 33545, "percent_yes": 48.83589208525861, "percent_no": 51.16410791474139, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.238221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.648789", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall those provisions of the City of Santa Rosa Residential Rent Stabilization and Other Tenant Protections Ordinance that establish rent control for certain residential rental properties, prohibit landlords from evicting tenants of certain properties except for specified reasons, and provide other protections to tenants, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4220, "fingerprint": "2017|201700087|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700087|SONOMA", "content_hash": "50fb6897468ee3eb", "measure_id": "201700087", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a cannabis business tax in the City of Santa Rosa on cultivation businesses up to $25 per square foot of cultivation area (annually adjusted by CPI) or 8% of gross receipts, and on cannabis manufacturing, distribution and dispensary businesses up to 8% of gross receipts, to maintain general funds for City services and to address cannabis industry impacts, with all funds subject to audits and staying local, generating undetermined revenue until repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25632, "no_votes": 7535, "total_votes": 33167, "percent_yes": 77.28163536044865, "percent_no": 22.718364639551353, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.238524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.648970", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a cannabis business tax in the City of Santa Rosa on cultivation businesses up to $25 per square foot of cultivation area (annually adjusted by CPI) or 8% of gross receipts, and on cannabis manufacturing, distribution and dispensary businesses up to 8% of gross receipts, to maintain general funds for City services and to address cannabis industry impacts, with all funds subject to audits and staying local, generating undetermined revenue until repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4223, "fingerprint": "2017|201700112|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700112|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c32a1d4e19fb1d36", "measure_id": "201700112", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide local funding which the State cannot take away, keep class sizes small, protect academic excellence, vocal and instrumental music, arts, maintain counseling services, provide current technology, and keep our library open, with no funds spent on administrators' salaries, and provide a senior citizen exemption, shall Wilmar Union School District (Wilson School) be authorized to levy $65 per parcel annually for eight (8) years ($70,980 annual funds raised)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 551, "no_votes": 305, "total_votes": 856, "percent_yes": 64.36915887850468, "percent_no": 35.63084112149532, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.239382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.649524", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide local funding which the State cannot take away, keep class sizes small, protect academic excellence, vocal and instrumental music, arts, maintain counseling services, provide current technology, and keep our library open, with no funds spent on administrators' salaries, and provide a senior citizen exemption, shall Wilmar Union School District (Wilson School) be authorized to levy $65 per parcel annually for eight (8) years ($70,980 annual funds raised)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4221, "fingerprint": "2017|201700088|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700088|SONOMA", "content_hash": "bd33836193c58799", "measure_id": "201700088", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a City of Cotati cannabis business tax on cannabis cultivation businesses up to $25 per square foot of cultivation area (annually adjusted by CPI) or 8% of gross receipts, and on cannabis manufacturing, distribution and dispensary businesses up to 8% of gross receipts, to maintain local City services and address cannabis industry impacts with all funds subject to annual audits, generating approximately $300,000 in revenue per year until repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 972, "no_votes": 262, "total_votes": 1234, "percent_yes": 78.7682333873582, "percent_no": 21.231766612641806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.238790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.649155", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a City of Cotati cannabis business tax on cannabis cultivation businesses up to $25 per square foot of cultivation area (annually adjusted by CPI) or 8% of gross receipts, and on cannabis manufacturing, distribution and dispensary businesses up to 8% of gross receipts, to maintain local City services and address cannabis industry impacts with all funds subject to annual audits, generating approximately $300,000 in revenue per year until repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4222, "fingerprint": "2017|201700089|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700089|SONOMA", "content_hash": "03d9236dd80ef8aa", "measure_id": "201700089", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Windsor adopt a resolution extending the Urban Growth Boundary (\"UGB\") to December 31, 2040, revising the boundaries of the UGB to include approximately 22.5 additional acres for future business growth known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 164-150-010, 164-150-009, and 164-150-054, and amending certain policies regarding implementation of the UGB?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3337, "no_votes": 1098, "total_votes": 4435, "percent_yes": 75.2423900789177, "percent_no": 24.757609921082306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.239116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.649336", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Windsor adopt a resolution extending the Urban Growth Boundary (\"UGB\") to December 31, 2040, revising the boundaries of the UGB to include approximately 22.5 additional acres for future business growth known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 164-150-010, 164-150-009, and 164-150-054, and amending certain policies regarding implementation of the UGB?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4224, "fingerprint": "2017|201700014|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700014|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "93d2424616cfcd92", "measure_id": "201700014", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain local library funding the State cannot take, keep branches open, maintain hours, provide programs for children, teens, adults and seniors, children\u2019s story times, literacy, homework and job search resources, maintain books, CDs, DVDs and reference materials -- shall Stanislaus County extend the existing one-eighth percent library sales tax for 12 years, commencing July 1, 2018, generating approximately $10 million annually, with an independent citizens oversight committee ensuring funds are spent only on Stanislaus County Libraries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41986, "no_votes": 9025, "total_votes": 51011, "percent_yes": 82.30773754680362, "percent_no": 17.692262453196378, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.239658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.649703", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain local library funding the State cannot take, keep branches open, maintain hours, provide programs for children, teens, adults and seniors, children\u2019s story times, literacy, homework and job search resources, maintain books, CDs, DVDs and reference materials -- shall Stanislaus County extend the existing one-eighth percent library sales tax for 12 years, commencing July 1, 2018, generating approximately $10 million annually, with an independent citizens oversight committee ensuring funds are spent only on Stanislaus County Libraries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4225, "fingerprint": "2017|201700090|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700090|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "6b2b33bdfbf1c0fe", "measure_id": "201700090", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Modesto adopt an ordinance establishing a cannabis business tax on all cannabis businesses within the City, up to 10% of gross receipts of each business, potentially generating approximately one million dollars or more in revenues annually for general City services, including neighborhood safety, maintaining parks and recreation, and job creation, with all revenues remaining local, and which continues until repealed by the City Council or the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19832, "no_votes": 4214, "total_votes": 24046, "percent_yes": 82.47525575979373, "percent_no": 17.524744240206275, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.239934", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.649895", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Modesto adopt an ordinance establishing a cannabis business tax on all cannabis businesses within the City, up to 10% of gross receipts of each business, potentially generating approximately one million dollars or more in revenues annually for general City services, including neighborhood safety, maintaining parks and recreation, and job creation, with all revenues remaining local, and which continues until repealed by the City Council or the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4226, "fingerprint": "2017|201700113|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700113|TRINITY", "content_hash": "f3edf7b047d7ab65", "measure_id": "201700113", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing 50 to 60 year-old classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace leaky roofs; make health and safety improvements including major mold removal, lead and asbestos abatement; increase student access to computers/technology/ to meet 21st century educational standards; and replace deteriorating plumbing, sewer, electrical heating, and cooling systems. Mountain Valley Unified School District will issue $5,950,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money for administrative or teachers salaries.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 457, "no_votes": 244, "total_votes": 701, "percent_yes": 65.19258202567761, "percent_no": 34.80741797432239, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.240255", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.650075", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing 50 to 60 year-old classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace leaky roofs; make health and safety improvements including major mold removal, lead and asbestos abatement; increase student access to computers/technology/ to meet 21st century educational standards; and replace deteriorating plumbing, sewer, electrical heating, and cooling systems. Mountain Valley Unified School District will issue $5,950,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money for administrative or teachers salaries.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4227, "fingerprint": "2017|201700091|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700091|TULARE", "content_hash": "475eb9d761ff0e31", "measure_id": "201700091", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help prevent the loss of vital public safety services, to maintain essential infrastructure, and to protect other general services, shall the City of Lindsay enact a general-purpose, one-percent sales tax, expected to generate $908,000 annually, with annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 397, "no_votes": 184, "total_votes": 581, "percent_yes": 68.33046471600689, "percent_no": 31.669535283993113, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-06-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.240557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.650348", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help prevent the loss of vital public safety services, to maintain essential infrastructure, and to protect other general services, shall the City of Lindsay enact a general-purpose, one-percent sales tax, expected to generate $908,000 annually, with annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4228, "fingerprint": "2017|201700092|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700092|TULARE", "content_hash": "f8c3bcbaa907d06d", "measure_id": "201700092", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For local revenue to improve the quality of life and essential general City services for Farmersville residents including police, 911 emergency medical response, fire department services, gang prevention programs, recreational facilities, park maintenance and improvements, street maintenance and repairs and other general services, shall Ordinance No. 483, imposing a one-half percent general transactions and use tax, be adopted? Estimated revenues of $280,000 annually, indefinitely.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 225, "no_votes": 147, "total_votes": 372, "percent_yes": 60.483870967741936, "percent_no": 39.516129032258064, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.240824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.650542", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For local revenue to improve the quality of life and essential general City services for Farmersville residents including police, 911 emergency medical response, fire department services, gang prevention programs, recreational facilities, park maintenance and improvements, street maintenance and repairs and other general services, shall Ordinance No. 483, imposing a one-half percent general transactions and use tax, be adopted? Estimated revenues of $280,000 annually, indefinitely.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4229, "fingerprint": "2017|201700093|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700093|TULARE", "content_hash": "1ecf32b27855d2c7", "measure_id": "201700093", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 484 be adopted authorizing a commercial cannabis business tax in the City of Farmersville on commercial cannabis businesses up to $25 per square foot (annually adjusted by CPI) or 10% of gross receipts, to maintain essential public safety and general City services including, but not limited to, police, drug addiction and gang prevention, park maintenance, street maintenance for Farmersville residents, generating undetermined revenue, potentially $500,000 to $3.5 million annually, until repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 242, "no_votes": 128, "total_votes": 370, "percent_yes": 65.4054054054054, "percent_no": 34.5945945945946, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.241117", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.650729", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 484 be adopted authorizing a commercial cannabis business tax in the City of Farmersville on commercial cannabis businesses up to $25 per square foot (annually adjusted by CPI) or 10% of gross receipts, to maintain essential public safety and general City services including, but not limited to, police, drug addiction and gang prevention, park maintenance, street maintenance for Farmersville residents, generating undetermined revenue, potentially $500,000 to $3.5 million annually, until repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4230, "fingerprint": "2017|201700094|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700094|TULARE", "content_hash": "126524cc647ba9eb", "measure_id": "201700094", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide local funding to improve quality of life; parks and recreation programs; neighborhood police patrols; gang prevention programs; street maintenance; lighting, landscaping, and trails; and other essential services, shall City of Woodlake Ordinance No. 609, imposing a one percent general transactions and use tax with independent audits and citizens\u2019 oversight, be adopted? Revenues are estimated at approximately $430,000 annually, indefinitely.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 293, "no_votes": 163, "total_votes": 456, "percent_yes": 64.25438596491229, "percent_no": 35.74561403508771, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.241421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.650911", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide local funding to improve quality of life; parks and recreation programs; neighborhood police patrols; gang prevention programs; street maintenance; lighting, landscaping, and trails; and other essential services, shall City of Woodlake Ordinance No. 609, imposing a one percent general transactions and use tax with independent audits and citizens\u2019 oversight, be adopted? Revenues are estimated at approximately $430,000 annually, indefinitely.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4231, "fingerprint": "2017|201700095|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2017|201700095|TULARE", "content_hash": "8685619ef9374849", "measure_id": "201700095", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2017, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Voters in California voted to impose state taxes on licensed cannabis businesses. Shall Ordinance No. 610 be enacted, imposing a local general tax on cannabis businesses at a rate not exceeding $25 per square foot (annually adjusted by CPI) or 10% of gross receipts, to maintain essential public safety and general City services for Woodlake residents; generating undetermined revenue until repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 308, "no_votes": 146, "total_votes": 454, "percent_yes": 67.84140969162996, "percent_no": 32.15859030837004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2017-11-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.241689", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.651101", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Voters in California voted to impose state taxes on licensed cannabis businesses. Shall Ordinance No. 610 be enacted, imposing a local general tax on cannabis businesses at a rate not exceeding $25 per square foot (annually adjusted by CPI) or 10% of gross receipts, to maintain essential public safety and general City services for Woodlake residents; generating undetermined revenue until repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11235, "fingerprint": "2016|201600549|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600549|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5c9bca306cee43c6", "measure_id": "201600549", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade aging classrooms and technology/science labs for career education to prepare students, veterans and workers for good jobs and university transfer, remove asbestos/retrofit buildings for earthquake safety, acquire, construct and repair sites/facilities/equipment, and improve campus safety/security, shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District issue $950,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, independent financial audits, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 87133, "no_votes": 47032, "total_votes": 134165, "percent_yes": 64.94465769761115, "percent_no": 35.05534230238885, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.676738", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.254784", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.664151", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade aging classrooms and technology/science labs for career education to prepare students, veterans and workers for good jobs and university transfer, remove asbestos/retrofit buildings for earthquake safety, acquire, construct and repair sites/facilities/equipment, and improve campus safety/security, shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District issue $950,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, independent financial audits, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4233, "fingerprint": "2016|201600002|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600002|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a38b2d733d1e3f12", "measure_id": "201600002", "measure_letter": "A1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide affordable local housing and prevent displacement of vulnerable populations, including low- and moderate-income households, veterans, seniors, and persons with disabilities; provide supportive housing for homeless people countywide; and help low- and middle-income households purchase homes and stay in their communities; shall the County of Alameda issue up to $580 million in general obligation bonds to acquire or improve real property, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 456705, "no_votes": 166320, "total_votes": 623025, "percent_yes": 73.3044420368364, "percent_no": 26.695557963163594, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.242412", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.651492", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide affordable local housing and prevent displacement of vulnerable populations, including low- and moderate-income households, veterans, seniors, and persons with disabilities; provide supportive housing for homeless people countywide; and help low- and middle-income households purchase homes and stay in their communities; shall the County of Alameda issue up to $580 million in general obligation bonds to acquire or improve real property, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11234, "fingerprint": "2016|201600182|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600182|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7afd6f183bde31ae", "measure_id": "201600182", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the Rent Stabilization Ordinance to: prohibit owner move-in evictions of families with children during the academic year; increase the amount of relocation assistance required for owner move-in evictions to $15,000 with additional $5,000 for certain tenants; clarify protections for elderly/disabled tenants; require filing of eviction notices; change the source of interest rates for security deposits; and clarify exemptions and penalties to conform with state law, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39332, "no_votes": 14427, "total_votes": 53759, "percent_yes": 73.16356331032944, "percent_no": 26.836436689670563, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.674752", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.251630", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.661069", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the Rent Stabilization Ordinance to: prohibit owner move-in evictions of families with children during the academic year; increase the amount of relocation assistance required for owner move-in evictions to $15,000 with additional $5,000 for certain tenants; clarify protections for elderly/disabled tenants; require filing of eviction notices; change the source of interest rates for security deposits; and clarify exemptions and penalties to conform with state law, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4232, "fingerprint": "2016|201600001|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600001|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c9ac6c8127701fb7", "measure_id": "201600001", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 250735, "no_votes": 84667, "total_votes": 335402, "percent_yes": 74.75656078377588, "percent_no": 25.243439216224118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.242035", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.651281", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4270, "fingerprint": "2016|201600546|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600546|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "00bc09e15cfc567b", "measure_id": "201600546", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To rebuild Marin and Ocean View elementary schools with seismically safe school facilities that support modern learning standards in subjects such as science, accessibility, sustainability, and energy efficiency; and improve other school facilities; shall Albany Unified School District issue $70 Million of bonds at legal rates for the acquisition and improvement of land and facilities, with citizen oversight and all funds staying in Albany to benefit local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4754, "no_votes": 2140, "total_votes": 6894, "percent_yes": 68.95851465042065, "percent_no": 31.041485349579347, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.253887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.663254", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To rebuild Marin and Ocean View elementary schools with seismically safe school facilities that support modern learning standards in subjects such as science, accessibility, sustainability, and energy efficiency; and improve other school facilities; shall Albany Unified School District issue $70 Million of bonds at legal rates for the acquisition and improvement of land and facilities, with citizen oversight and all funds staying in Albany to benefit local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11237, "fingerprint": "2016|201600553|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600553|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fb100ac22bcf5b3a", "measure_id": "201600553", "measure_letter": "B1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high-quality Alameda schools by protecting small class sizes; core academic, art, music, science, innovative, and athletic programs; neighborhood schools; and retaining excellent teachers; shall Alameda Unified School District continue for seven years, without increase, its existing parcel tax rate of $0.32 per building square foot not to exceed $7,999 per parcel, with senior exemptions, strict accountability measures (annual audits and independent citizen oversight), and all approximately $12,000,000 raised annually staying in Alameda schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27188, "no_votes": 9431, "total_votes": 36619, "percent_yes": 74.24561020235397, "percent_no": 25.754389797646027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.677631", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.255870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.665535", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high-quality Alameda schools by protecting small class sizes; core academic, art, music, science, innovative, and athletic programs; neighborhood schools; and retaining excellent teachers; shall Alameda Unified School District continue for seven years, without increase, its existing parcel tax rate of $0.32 per building square foot not to exceed $7,999 per parcel, with senior exemptions, strict accountability measures (annual audits and independent citizen oversight), and all approximately $12,000,000 raised annually staying in Alameda schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4264, "fingerprint": "2016|201600183|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600183|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "956ac4a1c0c9fda0", "measure_id": "201600183", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance: (1) amending the City\u2019s existing minimum wage ordinance to increase the minimum wage to $15 per hour for all employees in the City of Berkeley by October 1, 2019, and thereafter by the CPI, with exemptions for youth in job training programs and a $1.50 health benefit credit; (2) requiring that service charges be distributed to the employees who provide the services; and (3) mandating paid sick leave for employees, be adopted?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18628, "no_votes": 36063, "total_votes": 54691, "percent_yes": 34.0604487027116, "percent_no": 65.9395512972884, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.251949", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.661339", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance: (1) amending the City\u2019s existing minimum wage ordinance to increase the minimum wage to $15 per hour for all employees in the City of Berkeley by October 1, 2019, and thereafter by the CPI, with exemptions for youth in job training programs and a $1.50 health benefit credit; (2) requiring that service charges be distributed to the employees who provide the services; and (3) mandating paid sick leave for employees, be adopted?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4236, "fingerprint": "2016|201600154|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600154|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "84790ac3a162b6b7", "measure_id": "201600154", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the charter and municipal code of the City of Hayward be amended to change general municipal elections from June of even-numbered years to November of even-numbered years, to be effective in 2018; and, if approved, to extend temporarily by five months the terms of the mayor and council members elected in 2014 and 2016, respectively, and whose terms expire in 2018 and 2020?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13891, "no_votes": 9019, "total_votes": 22910, "percent_yes": 60.63291139240506, "percent_no": 39.36708860759494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.243481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.652035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the charter and municipal code of the City of Hayward be amended to change general municipal elections from June of even-numbered years to November of even-numbered years, to be effective in 2018; and, if approved, to extend temporarily by five months the terms of the mayor and council members elected in 2014 and 2016, respectively, and whose terms expire in 2018 and 2020?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4265, "fingerprint": "2016|201600184|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600184|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e4a0c75e28fc1556", "measure_id": "201600184", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance: increasing the City\u2019s existing minimum wage to $15 per hour on October 1, 2017, with annual increases based on the CPI + 3% beginning January 1, 2019 until it reaches $16.37 per hour in 2016 dollars, and thereafter based on the CPI; eliminating exemptions for youth in job training programs; requiring that hospitality service charges be distributed to the employees who provide the services; and mandating paid sick leave for employees be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18850, "no_votes": 35490, "total_votes": 54340, "percent_yes": 34.688995215311, "percent_no": 65.311004784689, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.252224", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.661682", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance: increasing the City\u2019s existing minimum wage to $15 per hour on October 1, 2017, with annual increases based on the CPI + 3% beginning January 1, 2019 until it reaches $16.37 per hour in 2016 dollars, and thereafter based on the CPI; eliminating exemptions for youth in job training programs; requiring that hospitality service charges be distributed to the employees who provide the services; and mandating paid sick leave for employees be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4234, "fingerprint": "2016|201600152|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600152|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6033caa37b0b78fc", "measure_id": "201600152", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City of Hayward services including: neighborhood police patrols, fire stations/911, firefighter, paramedic response times; preserving youth/anti-gang programs; emergency/disaster preparedness; city streets, sidewalks and lighting; shall the City of Hayward renew the existing Utility Users Tax at the current 5.5 percent rate on gas, electricity, video, telecommunications services, providing $16 million annually for 20 years from the current end date, with exemptions for low-income lifeline users; and all money used for City of Hayward services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17271, "no_votes": 6283, "total_votes": 23554, "percent_yes": 73.32512524411989, "percent_no": 26.67487475588011, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.242727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.651675", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City of Hayward services including: neighborhood police patrols, fire stations/911, firefighter, paramedic response times; preserving youth/anti-gang programs; emergency/disaster preparedness; city streets, sidewalks and lighting; shall the City of Hayward renew the existing Utility Users Tax at the current 5.5 percent rate on gas, electricity, video, telecommunications services, providing $16 million annually for 20 years from the current end date, with exemptions for low-income lifeline users; and all money used for City of Hayward services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4240, "fingerprint": "2016|201600158|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600158|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fa7e301618fd3dec", "measure_id": "201600158", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance permanently increasing the gross receipts tax on owners of three or more residential rental units from 1.081% to 1.5%, prohibiting landlords from passing the tax on to sitting tenants except as allowed by law, and authorizing the Council to create a citizen panel to make recommendations on increasing affordable housing and protecting residents from homelessness be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16328, "no_votes": 39874, "total_votes": 56202, "percent_yes": 29.05234689156969, "percent_no": 70.9476531084303, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.244811", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.652778", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance permanently increasing the gross receipts tax on owners of three or more residential rental units from 1.081% to 1.5%, prohibiting landlords from passing the tax on to sitting tenants except as allowed by law, and authorizing the Council to create a citizen panel to make recommendations on increasing affordable housing and protecting residents from homelessness be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4271, "fingerprint": "2016|201600547|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600547|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a7af862f561ef64d", "measure_id": "201600547", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve Albanay Middle School overcrowding, construct classrooms, science labs, and flexible learning spaces that meet seismic safety and accessibility codes, replace old portables with modern classrooms, and acquire technology and equipment at all schools to support science, engineering, math, and the humanities; shall albany Unified School District issue $25 Million of bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds benefitting Albany schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4618, "no_votes": 1660, "total_votes": 6278, "percent_yes": 73.55845810767761, "percent_no": 26.44154189232239, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.254164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.663559", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve Albanay Middle School overcrowding, construct classrooms, science labs, and flexible learning spaces that meet seismic safety and accessibility codes, replace old portables with modern classrooms, and acquire technology and equipment at all schools to support science, engineering, math, and the humanities; shall albany Unified School District issue $25 Million of bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds benefitting Albany schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11238, "fingerprint": "2016|201600554|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600554|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b20a458c9042d39a", "measure_id": "201600554", "measure_letter": "E1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high quality public education and fund class size reduction, school libraries, teacher training, student support, music programs, instructional technology, and other designated purposes, shall the Berkeley Unified School District replace its expiring special tax with an annual tax at 37\u00a2 / square foot for taxable buildings, for eight years, with annual cost-of-living adjustments and a low-income senior exemption? An oversight committee and independent auditors will monitor this fund.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53105, "no_votes": 6658, "total_votes": 59763, "percent_yes": 88.85932767766009, "percent_no": 11.14067232233991, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.677819", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.256141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.665838", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high quality public education and fund class size reduction, school libraries, teacher training, student support, music programs, instructional technology, and other designated purposes, shall the Berkeley Unified School District replace its expiring special tax with an annual tax at 37\u00a2 / square foot for taxable buildings, for eight years, with annual cost-of-living adjustments and a low-income senior exemption? An oversight committee and independent auditors will monitor this fund.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4242, "fingerprint": "2016|201600160|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600160|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "07cc344525e61c1b", "measure_id": "201600160", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To assure local control and close on-going deficits, shall the City of Hayward be authorized to enact a general tax ordinance not exceeding 15% of gross sales for all products associated with medical or adult use of cannabis, from cultivation, distribution, manufacturing, and retailing of cannabis or products derived therefrom, if the City of Hayward permits cannabis business activities, such tax to be in addition to any other taxes imposed by the City of Hayward or the State of California?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26729, "no_votes": 17357, "total_votes": 44086, "percent_yes": 60.62922469718279, "percent_no": 39.37077530281721, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.245357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.654055", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To assure local control and close on-going deficits, shall the City of Hayward be authorized to enact a general tax ordinance not exceeding 15% of gross sales for all products associated with medical or adult use of cannabis, from cultivation, distribution, manufacturing, and retailing of cannabis or products derived therefrom, if the City of Hayward permits cannabis business activities, such tax to be in addition to any other taxes imposed by the City of Hayward or the State of California?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4235, "fingerprint": "2016|201600153|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600153|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "10190c766410aabe", "measure_id": "201600153", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential police, fire, and paramedic service, to prevent the reduction in maintenance in City parks, greenspaces and other public areas, and to prevent the loss of youth, family, and senior recreational and safety services, shall the City of Piedmont continue to authorize a parcel tax, replacing the existing Municipal Services Tax, as is more specifically set forth in Ord. 721 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3591, "no_votes": 1541, "total_votes": 5132, "percent_yes": 69.97272018706158, "percent_no": 30.027279812938417, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.243161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.651855", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential police, fire, and paramedic service, to prevent the reduction in maintenance in City parks, greenspaces and other public areas, and to prevent the loss of youth, family, and senior recreational and safety services, shall the City of Piedmont continue to authorize a parcel tax, replacing the existing Municipal Services Tax, as is more specifically set forth in Ord. 721 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4260, "fingerprint": "2016|201600178|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600178|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "06102771277dcc5d", "measure_id": "201600178", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance affirming and readopting the open space designation \u201cOSP Parks, Trail Ways, Recreation Corridors and Protected Areas\u201d in Land Use Element for the 2003-2025 City of Livermore General Plan for the Springtown Golf Course, except for the Springtown Library and the Springtown Association parcel, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30226, "no_votes": 7020, "total_votes": 37246, "percent_yes": 81.15233850614831, "percent_no": 18.84766149385169, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.250511", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.660319", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance affirming and readopting the open space designation \u201cOSP Parks, Trail Ways, Recreation Corridors and Protected Areas\u201d in Land Use Element for the 2003-2025 City of Livermore General Plan for the Springtown Golf Course, except for the Springtown Library and the Springtown Association parcel, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4272, "fingerprint": "2016|201600548|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600548|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2af405a407743cb2", "measure_id": "201600548", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade and repair aging classrooms at local schools; improve school safety and security; expand classroom space for 21st-century education; update science labs and learning technology; improve access for students with disabilities; and renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms, sites, equipment and facilities; shall Castro Valley Unified School District issue $123 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, and no money taken by the State or used for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9179, "no_votes": 4095, "total_votes": 13274, "percent_yes": 69.1502184722013, "percent_no": 30.849781527798697, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.254475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.663847", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and repair aging classrooms at local schools; improve school safety and security; expand classroom space for 21st-century education; update science labs and learning technology; improve access for students with disabilities; and renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms, sites, equipment and facilities; shall Castro Valley Unified School District issue $123 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, and no money taken by the State or used for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11239, "fingerprint": "2016|201600555|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600555|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8588d22be1ffa174", "measure_id": "201600555", "measure_letter": "G1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide a districtwide educator salary increase designed to attract/retain teachers; provide enhanced middle school art, music, languages/other programs in addition to core educational programs; improve academic achievement; provide safe, positive schools, and prepare students for college/careers; shall Oakland Unified School District levy a tax of $120 per parcel, providing $12.4 million annually, for 12 years, with exemptions for senior and low income residents, no money for Sacramento, and all money benefitting Oakland students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 138889, "no_votes": 30002, "total_votes": 168891, "percent_yes": 82.23587994623752, "percent_no": 17.764120053762483, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.678014", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.256414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.666159", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a districtwide educator salary increase designed to attract/retain teachers; provide enhanced middle school art, music, languages/other programs in addition to core educational programs; improve academic achievement; provide safe, positive schools, and prepare students for college/careers; shall Oakland Unified School District levy a tax of $120 per parcel, providing $12.4 million annually, for 12 years, with exemptions for senior and low income residents, no money for Sacramento, and all money benefitting Oakland students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4243, "fingerprint": "2016|201600161|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600161|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9d0bce133d766d35", "measure_id": "201600161", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To upgrade City of Newark facilities and services, including replacing the seismically unsafe police operations/emergency operations center to survive an earthquake; providing updated crimefighting technology; replacing aging library/city facilities with buildings meeting safety codes; providing disabled access and senior/teen/children\u2019s facilities; and other facilities and services; shall the City of Newark enact a one-half cent sales tax, providing $3,500,000 annually, for 25 years, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9373, "no_votes": 5993, "total_votes": 15366, "percent_yes": 60.99830795262268, "percent_no": 39.00169204737732, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.245635", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.654532", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade City of Newark facilities and services, including replacing the seismically unsafe police operations/emergency operations center to survive an earthquake; providing updated crimefighting technology; replacing aging library/city facilities with buildings meeting safety codes; providing disabled access and senior/teen/children\u2019s facilities; and other facilities and services; shall the City of Newark enact a one-half cent sales tax, providing $3,500,000 annually, for 25 years, with annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4273, "fingerprint": "2016|201600550|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600550|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d0bbe3d859bfc689", "measure_id": "201600550", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, construct schools to prevent overcrowding; update aging classrooms/science labs; continue providing 21st century technology; ensure classrooms meet fire/safety codes, and improve energy/operational efficiency, utilizing savings for instruction shall Dublin Unified School District issue $283 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizens oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying in Dublin?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6216, "no_votes": 4111, "total_votes": 10327, "percent_yes": 60.191730415415904, "percent_no": 39.808269584584096, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.255069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.664605", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, construct schools to prevent overcrowding; update aging classrooms/science labs; continue providing 21st century technology; ensure classrooms meet fire/safety codes, and improve energy/operational efficiency, utilizing savings for instruction shall Dublin Unified School District issue $283 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizens oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying in Dublin?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11240, "fingerprint": "2016|201600556|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600556|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "cc7e9ab1724d3cbe", "measure_id": "201600556", "measure_letter": "H1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational facilities and equipment to support advanced courses in math, science, engineering, arts and technology; repair and modernize aging science labs and classrooms at the high school and middle school; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; add kindergarten classrooms; and improve the likelihood of qualifying for state matching funds, shall Piedmont Unified School District issue 66 million dollars in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5200, "no_votes": 1903, "total_votes": 7103, "percent_yes": 73.20850344924679, "percent_no": 26.79149655075321, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.678204", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.256680", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.666483", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational facilities and equipment to support advanced courses in math, science, engineering, arts and technology; repair and modernize aging science labs and classrooms at the high school and middle school; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; add kindergarten classrooms; and improve the likelihood of qualifying for state matching funds, shall Piedmont Unified School District issue 66 million dollars in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4244, "fingerprint": "2016|201600162|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600162|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fcba37bc69d1ac05", "measure_id": "201600162", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Oakland impose a 1 cent per ounce general tax on the distribution of sugar sweetened beverages, including products such as sodas, sports drinks, sweetened teas, energy drinks, but exempting: milk products, 100% juice, baby formula, diet drinks, or drinks taken for medical reasons; and providing an exemption for small businesses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107405, "no_votes": 67655, "total_votes": 175060, "percent_yes": 61.353250314178, "percent_no": 38.646749685822, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.245905", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.654916", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Oakland impose a 1 cent per ounce general tax on the distribution of sugar sweetened beverages, including products such as sodas, sports drinks, sweetened teas, energy drinks, but exempting: milk products, 100% juice, baby formula, diet drinks, or drinks taken for medical reasons; and providing an exemption for small businesses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4269, "fingerprint": "2016|201600545|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600545|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "617efc29e97e5e1b", "measure_id": "201600545", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue providing Fremont schools stable funding for quality local education/programs that cannot be taken away by the State, maintaining math, science, reading and writing programs, relieving overcrowding in classrooms, and attracting/retaining qualified teachers including quality science teachers, shall the Fremont Unified School District renew its expiring voter approved $73 per parcel tax, for nine years, exempting seniors, with no money for administrator salaries and all money benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27145, "no_votes": 11477, "total_votes": 38622, "percent_yes": 70.2837760861685, "percent_no": 29.7162239138315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.253528", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.662967", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue providing Fremont schools stable funding for quality local education/programs that cannot be taken away by the State, maintaining math, science, reading and writing programs, relieving overcrowding in classrooms, and attracting/retaining qualified teachers including quality science teachers, shall the Fremont Unified School District renew its expiring voter approved $73 per parcel tax, for nine years, exempting seniors, with no money for administrator salaries and all money benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11241, "fingerprint": "2016|201600557|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600557|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "73f2c2fe274118b7", "measure_id": "201600557", "measure_letter": "I1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade aging classrooms and facilities at local schools; provide 21st -century learning technology and facilities; improve school safety and security; update science labs; improve energy and water efficiency; renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms, equipment and facilities; and construct a new elementary school, shall Pleasanton Unified School District issue $270,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, all funds used for local schools, and no money used for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23782, "no_votes": 10633, "total_votes": 34415, "percent_yes": 69.1035885515037, "percent_no": 30.896411448496295, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.678390", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.256958", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.666840", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade aging classrooms and facilities at local schools; provide 21st -century learning technology and facilities; improve school safety and security; update science labs; improve energy and water efficiency; renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms, equipment and facilities; and construct a new elementary school, shall Pleasanton Unified School District issue $270,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, all funds used for local schools, and no money used for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4258, "fingerprint": "2016|201600176|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600176|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "95b7588676f64908", "measure_id": "201600176", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to Increase the Maximum Lease Term of City-Owned Real Property From Sixty-Six Years To Ninety-Nine Years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76393, "no_votes": 67449, "total_votes": 143842, "percent_yes": 53.10896678299801, "percent_no": 46.89103321700199, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.249930", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.659948", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to Increase the Maximum Lease Term of City-Owned Real Property From Sixty-Six Years To Ninety-Nine Years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4274, "fingerprint": "2016|201600552|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600552|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8851a5385621f27b", "measure_id": "201600552", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate aging Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District classrooms and school facilities with funding that the State can't take away; improve fire safety and security systems; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, restrooms and electrical systems; modernize outdated classrooms, science labs and instructional technology; upgrade, acquire, construct, equip classrooms/facilities and qualify for State matching funds, shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District issue $245 million in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits and public reports, no money for administrators, and keeping all funds local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14510, "no_votes": 7199, "total_votes": 21709, "percent_yes": 66.83863835275692, "percent_no": 33.16136164724308, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.255604", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.665229", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate aging Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District classrooms and school facilities with funding that the State can't take away; improve fire safety and security systems; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, restrooms and electrical systems; modernize outdated classrooms, science labs and instructional technology; upgrade, acquire, construct, equip classrooms/facilities and qualify for State matching funds, shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District issue $245 million in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits and public reports, no money for administrators, and keeping all funds local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11242, "fingerprint": "2016|201600558|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600558|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ca5ca97a18fe8ea7", "measure_id": "201600558", "measure_letter": "J1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair leaky roofs, faulty plumbing and electrical systems; improve heating and ventilation; improve student safety by upgrading security lighting, emergency communications, fire alarms and sprinklers; upgrade classrooms, libraries and science labs; replace deteriorating portables; and provide facilities and equipment needed to support instruction in math, science, engineering, arts and technology; shall San Leandro Unified School District issue $104,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and all money benefiting San Leandro children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19050, "no_votes": 6419, "total_votes": 25469, "percent_yes": 74.79681181043621, "percent_no": 25.20318818956379, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.678575", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.257308", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.667148", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair leaky roofs, faulty plumbing and electrical systems; improve heating and ventilation; improve student safety by upgrading security lighting, emergency communications, fire alarms and sprinklers; upgrade classrooms, libraries and science labs; replace deteriorating portables; and provide facilities and equipment needed to support instruction in math, science, engineering, arts and technology; shall San Leandro Unified School District issue $104,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and all money benefiting San Leandro children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4267, "fingerprint": "2016|201600186|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600186|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "446d67f0ef2db76c", "measure_id": "201600186", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Oakland\u2019s Just Cause For Eviction and Rent Adjustment Ordinances be amended by: (1) extending just-cause eviction requirements from residential rental units offered for rent on or before October 14, 1980 to those approved for occupancy before December 31, 1995; and (2) requiring landlords to request approval from the City before increasing rents by more than the cost-of-living adjustment allowed by City law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 124282, "no_votes": 40895, "total_votes": 165177, "percent_yes": 75.24171040762334, "percent_no": 24.758289592376656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.252895", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.662341", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Oakland\u2019s Just Cause For Eviction and Rent Adjustment Ordinances be amended by: (1) extending just-cause eviction requirements from residential rental units offered for rent on or before October 14, 1980 to those approved for occupancy before December 31, 1995; and (2) requiring landlords to request approval from the City before increasing rents by more than the cost-of-living adjustment allowed by City law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4237, "fingerprint": "2016|201600155|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600155|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9fa51fb866792940", "measure_id": "201600155", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Lund Ranch project in Southeast Pleasanton, which consists of 43 single-family homes on approximately 17 acres and 174 acres for permanent public open space and 2 miles of public trails, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10716, "no_votes": 10176, "total_votes": 20892, "percent_yes": 51.29236071223436, "percent_no": 48.70763928776564, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.243848", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.652216", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lund Ranch project in Southeast Pleasanton, which consists of 43 single-family homes on approximately 17 acres and 174 acres for permanent public open space and 2 miles of public trails, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4250, "fingerprint": "2016|201600168|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600168|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "afc4ff0a6a4120f9", "measure_id": "201600168", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve public safety and invest in neighborhoods throughout Oakland by re-paving streets to remove potholes, rebuilding cracked and deteriorating sidewalks, funding bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements, funding affordable housing for Oaklanders, and providing funds for facility improvements, such as, neighborhood recreation centers, playgrounds, and libraries, shall the City of Oakland issue $600 million in bonds, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 139450, "no_votes": 30390, "total_votes": 169840, "percent_yes": 82.10668864813942, "percent_no": 17.893311351860575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.247700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.658102", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve public safety and invest in neighborhoods throughout Oakland by re-paving streets to remove potholes, rebuilding cracked and deteriorating sidewalks, funding bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements, funding affordable housing for Oaklanders, and providing funds for facility improvements, such as, neighborhood recreation centers, playgrounds, and libraries, shall the City of Oakland issue $600 million in bonds, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11236, "fingerprint": "2016|201600551|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600551|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f7d2f8bc8e4b1d8e", "measure_id": "201600551", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure high-quality education for all students, with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Lammersville Joint Unified School District provide classrooms/facilities for science, technology, engineering and math to prepare students for college and careers; Mountain House High School's career technical educational facilities/library; and provide high-speed wireless networks to support instructional technology; by issuing $56,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17, "no_votes": 19, "total_votes": 36, "percent_yes": 47.22222222222222, "percent_no": 52.77777777777778, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.677249", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.255335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.664923", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure high-quality education for all students, with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Lammersville Joint Unified School District provide classrooms/facilities for science, technology, engineering and math to prepare students for college and careers; Mountain House High School's career technical educational facilities/library; and provide high-speed wireless networks to support instructional technology; by issuing $56,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4262, "fingerprint": "2016|201600180|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600180|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "bfddfc359ff60a57", "measure_id": "201600180", "measure_letter": "L1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters adopt the City\u2019s March 31, 2016 Rent Stabilization Ordinance, which (a) limits residential rent increases to once annually, (b) requires mediation for all residential rent increases above 5%, including binding decisions on rent increases for most rental units, (c) restricts reasons for evictions, (d) requires landlords to pay relocation fees when terminating certain tenancies, and (e) permits the City Council to amend the ordinance to address changing concerns and conditions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20167, "no_votes": 16164, "total_votes": 36331, "percent_yes": 55.50906938977732, "percent_no": 44.49093061022268, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.251095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.660699", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters adopt the City\u2019s March 31, 2016 Rent Stabilization Ordinance, which (a) limits residential rent increases to once annually, (b) requires mediation for all residential rent increases above 5%, including binding decisions on rent increases for most rental units, (c) restricts reasons for evictions, (d) requires landlords to pay relocation fees when terminating certain tenancies, and (e) permits the City Council to amend the ordinance to address changing concerns and conditions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4259, "fingerprint": "2016|201600177|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600177|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "54fbaa3b5cdd1567", "measure_id": "201600177", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Oakland\u2019s City Charter be amended to establish: (1) a Police Commission of civilian commissioners to oversee the Police Department by reviewing and proposing changes to Department policies and procedures, requiring the Mayor to appoint any new Chief of Police from a list of candidates provided by the Commission, and having the authority to terminate the Chief of Police for cause; and (2) a Community Police Review Agency to investigate complaints of police misconduct and recommend discipline?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 137032, "no_votes": 27695, "total_votes": 164727, "percent_yes": 83.18733419536566, "percent_no": 16.812665804634335, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.250200", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.660130", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Oakland\u2019s City Charter be amended to establish: (1) a Police Commission of civilian commissioners to oversee the Police Department by reviewing and proposing changes to Department policies and procedures, requiring the Mayor to appoint any new Chief of Police from a list of candidates provided by the Commission, and having the authority to terminate the Chief of Police for cause; and (2) a Community Police Review Agency to investigate complaints of police misconduct and recommend discipline?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4251, "fingerprint": "2016|201600169|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600169|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5f4a4902e069670b", "measure_id": "201600169", "measure_letter": "M1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to (a) limit annual residential rent increases for certain units to 65% of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index, (b) create an elected Rent Control Board separate from the City with authority to hire staff, impose fees on landlords for program funding and assess penalties, (c) limit the reasons for terminating tenancies and (d) require rental property owners to pay relocation fees to tenants when terminating certain tenancies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12281, "no_votes": 23768, "total_votes": 36049, "percent_yes": 34.06751920996421, "percent_no": 65.93248079003578, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.247966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.658498", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to (a) limit annual residential rent increases for certain units to 65% of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index, (b) create an elected Rent Control Board separate from the City with authority to hire staff, impose fees on landlords for program funding and assess penalties, (c) limit the reasons for terminating tenancies and (d) require rental property owners to pay relocation fees to tenants when terminating certain tenancies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4268, "fingerprint": "2016|201600187|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600187|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "faf1025e81a27400", "measure_id": "201600187", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance proposing to amend the City of Pleasanton\u2019s General Plan to prohibit retail uses of 50,000 square feet or greater, larger scale retail and club retail, in the Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12849, "no_votes": 21532, "total_votes": 34381, "percent_yes": 37.37238591082283, "percent_no": 62.62761408917717, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.253173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.662671", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance proposing to amend the City of Pleasanton\u2019s General Plan to prohibit retail uses of 50,000 square feet or greater, larger scale retail and club retail, in the Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4263, "fingerprint": "2016|201600181|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600181|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "eeceb3c730e84b40", "measure_id": "201600181", "measure_letter": "N1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance authorizing the Albany City Council to amend the residential parking requirements established by Measure D (enacted by the Albany voters in 1978), after following the normal procedures for amending City Zoning Ordinances, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5139, "no_votes": 2799, "total_votes": 7938, "percent_yes": 64.73922902494331, "percent_no": 35.26077097505669, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.251361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.660886", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance authorizing the Albany City Council to amend the residential parking requirements established by Measure D (enacted by the Albany voters in 1978), after following the normal procedures for amending City Zoning Ordinances, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4245, "fingerprint": "2016|201600163|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600163|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e531bc327653a048", "measure_id": "201600163", "measure_letter": "NN", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and enhance the City of San Leandro, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including: social services, public art, programs that celebrate diversity, multilingual programming and other general city services, shall the City of San Leandro levy an ongoing tax of up to 10% of gross receipts of cannabis (marijuana) businesses in the city, providing $500,000 annually, requiring independent citizen oversight, financial audits, and that all funds stay in the City of San Leandro?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22710, "no_votes": 7476, "total_votes": 30186, "percent_yes": 75.23355197773802, "percent_no": 24.766448022261983, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.246238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.655271", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and enhance the City of San Leandro, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including: social services, public art, programs that celebrate diversity, multilingual programming and other general city services, shall the City of San Leandro levy an ongoing tax of up to 10% of gross receipts of cannabis (marijuana) businesses in the city, providing $500,000 annually, requiring independent citizen oversight, financial audits, and that all funds stay in the City of San Leandro?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4238, "fingerprint": "2016|201600156|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600156|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2883913c2db67788", "measure_id": "201600156", "measure_letter": "O1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance enacting a one cent per ounce general tax, providing approximately $223,000 annually with no expiration date, on the distribution of sugar-sweetened beverages and sweeteners used to sweeten such drinks, but exempting: (1) sweeteners typically used by consumers and distributed to grocery stores; (2) drinks and sweeteners distributed to small retailers; (3) milk products, 100% juice, baby formula, alcohol, or drinks taken for medical reasons, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6282, "no_votes": 2485, "total_votes": 8767, "percent_yes": 71.65507014942398, "percent_no": 28.344929850576023, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.244132", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.652399", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance enacting a one cent per ounce general tax, providing approximately $223,000 annually with no expiration date, on the distribution of sugar-sweetened beverages and sweeteners used to sweeten such drinks, but exempting: (1) sweeteners typically used by consumers and distributed to grocery stores; (2) drinks and sweeteners distributed to small retailers; (3) milk products, 100% juice, baby formula, alcohol, or drinks taken for medical reasons, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4246, "fingerprint": "2016|201600164|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600164|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "403eaca105855302", "measure_id": "201600164", "measure_letter": "OO", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and enhance the City of San Leandro, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including: enhancing City infrastructure and general City services, shall the City of San Leandro modify the ongoing business license tax to reduce taxes for small businesses, charge 10 percent of gross receipts for parking lots, and charge $100 per 1,000 square feet of warehouse and distribution space, providing $800,000 annually, requiring independent taxpayer oversight, and all funds stay in San Leandro?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19363, "no_votes": 10030, "total_votes": 29393, "percent_yes": 65.87622903412377, "percent_no": 34.12377096587623, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.246522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.655658", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and enhance the City of San Leandro, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including: enhancing City infrastructure and general City services, shall the City of San Leandro modify the ongoing business license tax to reduce taxes for small businesses, charge 10 percent of gross receipts for parking lots, and charge $100 per 1,000 square feet of warehouse and distribution space, providing $800,000 annually, requiring independent taxpayer oversight, and all funds stay in San Leandro?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4239, "fingerprint": "2016|201600157|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600157|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d25111953ef8c578", "measure_id": "201600157", "measure_letter": "P1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To repair and upgrade aging and deteriorating public sidewalks and remove obstructions so that Albany sidewalks are safe and accessible by pedestrians, including people with disabilities that affect mobility, shall the City of Albany enact a special parcel tax ($38.65 annually for most single family parcels, other parcel types at specified rates) for 10 years providing approximately $203,000 annually, with annual public reports and all proceeds to be spent in Albany?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6872, "no_votes": 1871, "total_votes": 8743, "percent_yes": 78.60002287544322, "percent_no": 21.399977124556784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.244405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.652583", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade aging and deteriorating public sidewalks and remove obstructions so that Albany sidewalks are safe and accessible by pedestrians, including people with disabilities that affect mobility, shall the City of Albany enact a special parcel tax ($38.65 annually for most single family parcels, other parcel types at specified rates) for 10 years providing approximately $203,000 annually, with annual public reports and all proceeds to be spent in Albany?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4247, "fingerprint": "2016|201600165|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600165|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9282d55ec3f9977e", "measure_id": "201600165", "measure_letter": "PP", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and enhance the City of San Leandro, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including: enhancing library programming for children, more space for books, reference materials and public access computers, enhancing parks and infrastructure, and other general City services, shall the City of San Leandro increase the ongoing transient occupancy tax charged to hotel guests from 10% to 14%, providing $200,000 annually, requiring independent citizen oversight, financial audits, and all funds staying in the City of San Leandro?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20463, "no_votes": 9229, "total_votes": 29692, "percent_yes": 68.91755354977772, "percent_no": 31.082446450222278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.246810", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.656064", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and enhance the City of San Leandro, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including: enhancing library programming for children, more space for books, reference materials and public access computers, enhancing parks and infrastructure, and other general City services, shall the City of San Leandro increase the ongoing transient occupancy tax charged to hotel guests from 10% to 14%, providing $200,000 annually, requiring independent citizen oversight, financial audits, and all funds staying in the City of San Leandro?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4252, "fingerprint": "2016|201600170|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600170|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5af8adfc361a3b12", "measure_id": "201600170", "measure_letter": "Q1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Albany City Charter be amended to authorize the City Council to establish procedures for filling a vacancy in an elective office by appointment, permit quarterly meetings of the Police and Fire Pension Board and change eligibility requirements for Board members, authorize the City Council to set fees for copies of official records, make the language within the Charter gender neutral, and make numerous other administrative, technical and clarifying changes?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5911, "no_votes": 1639, "total_votes": 7550, "percent_yes": 78.29139072847681, "percent_no": 21.708609271523187, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.248262", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.658706", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Albany City Charter be amended to authorize the City Council to establish procedures for filling a vacancy in an elective office by appointment, permit quarterly meetings of the Police and Fire Pension Board and change eligibility requirements for Board members, authorize the City Council to set fees for copies of official records, make the language within the Charter gender neutral, and make numerous other administrative, technical and clarifying changes?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4248, "fingerprint": "2016|201600166|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600166|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "75ea1aca9632fc0a", "measure_id": "201600166", "measure_letter": "QQ", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential police/ fire services, including maintaining 911 emergency response times, paramedic services /neighborhood police patrols; keeping fire stations open /maintaining fire prevention services; enhancing public school safety; and maintaining youth violence prevention/ gang intervention programs; shall Union City extend its existing voter approved public safety services measure, with an average rate of $123 per residential parcel, providing $4,100,000 annually for 4 years, without increasing taxes, requiring citizen's oversight, and no funds for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18741, "no_votes": 5236, "total_votes": 23977, "percent_yes": 78.16240563873713, "percent_no": 21.837594361262873, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.247153", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.656928", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential police/ fire services, including maintaining 911 emergency response times, paramedic services /neighborhood police patrols; keeping fire stations open /maintaining fire prevention services; enhancing public school safety; and maintaining youth violence prevention/ gang intervention programs; shall Union City extend its existing voter approved public safety services measure, with an average rate of $123 per residential parcel, providing $4,100,000 annually for 4 years, without increasing taxes, requiring citizen's oversight, and no funds for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4253, "fingerprint": "2016|201600171|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600171|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8251c91a2996f134", "measure_id": "201600171", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Albany City Charter be amended to dissolve the City\u2019s Civil Service Board and to add a definition for the term \u201cclassified service\u201d?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5451, "no_votes": 1665, "total_votes": 7116, "percent_yes": 76.60202360876897, "percent_no": 23.397976391231026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.248595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.658903", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Albany City Charter be amended to dissolve the City\u2019s Civil Service Board and to add a definition for the term \u201cclassified service\u201d?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4254, "fingerprint": "2016|201600172|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600172|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fde08de531736ac6", "measure_id": "201600172", "measure_letter": "S1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Albany City Charter be amended to remove term limits for the Albany Unified School District School Board of Education Members, this provision to take effect on January 1, 2023?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2643, "no_votes": 5066, "total_votes": 7709, "percent_yes": 34.2846024127643, "percent_no": 65.7153975872357, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.248861", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.659103", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Albany City Charter be amended to remove term limits for the Albany Unified School District School Board of Education Members, this provision to take effect on January 1, 2023?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4249, "fingerprint": "2016|201600167|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600167|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "15673c06c85f4714", "measure_id": "201600167", "measure_letter": "T1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds not exceeding $100,000,000 to repair, renovate, replace, or reconstruct the City\u2019s aging infrastructure and facilities, including sidewalks, storm drains, parks, streets, senior and recreation centers, and other important City facilities and buildings? Financial Implications: The average annual cost over the 40-year period the bonds are outstanding would be approximately $21, $90, and $128, respectively, for homes with assessed valuations of $100,000, $425,000 and $600,000.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50413, "no_votes": 7800, "total_votes": 58213, "percent_yes": 86.60093106350814, "percent_no": 13.399068936491858, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.247428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.657626", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds not exceeding $100,000,000 to repair, renovate, replace, or reconstruct the City\u2019s aging infrastructure and facilities, including sidewalks, storm drains, parks, streets, senior and recreation centers, and other important City facilities and buildings? Financial Implications: The average annual cost over the 40-year period the bonds are outstanding would be approximately $21, $90, and $128, respectively, for homes with assessed valuations of $100,000, $425,000 and $600,000.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4241, "fingerprint": "2016|201600159|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600159|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "bbe55634cb11434e", "measure_id": "201600159", "measure_letter": "U1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance permanently increasing the gross receipts tax on owners of five or more residential rental units be increased from 1.081% to 2.880%, prohibiting landlords from passing the tax on to sitting tenants, and directing the Housing Advisory Commission to make recommendations on funding and programs to increase affordable housing and protect Berkeley residents from homelessness, be adopted? Financial Implications: This amendment is estimated to raise approximately $3,900,000 annually, increasing with rents.\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43014, "no_votes": 14389, "total_votes": 57403, "percent_yes": 74.93336585195895, "percent_no": 25.066634148041047, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.245087", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.653371", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance permanently increasing the gross receipts tax on owners of five or more residential rental units be increased from 1.081% to 2.880%, prohibiting landlords from passing the tax on to sitting tenants, and directing the Housing Advisory Commission to make recommendations on funding and programs to increase affordable housing and protect Berkeley residents from homelessness, be adopted? Financial Implications: This amendment is estimated to raise approximately $3,900,000 annually, increasing with rents.\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4261, "fingerprint": "2016|201600179|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600179|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "dff5dbff2df75557", "measure_id": "201600179", "measure_letter": "V1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City\u2019s appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased to allow expenditure of the proceeds of City taxes and income from the investment of those taxes for fiscal years 2017 through 2020? Financial Implications: This measure would not increase taxes or impose a new tax. It would authorize the City to continue to spend the proceeds of already-approved taxes for FY 2017 through 2020.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47070, "no_votes": 6608, "total_votes": 53678, "percent_yes": 87.68955624278104, "percent_no": 12.310443757218962, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.250819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.660510", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City\u2019s appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased to allow expenditure of the proceeds of City taxes and income from the investment of those taxes for fiscal years 2017 through 2020? Financial Implications: This measure would not increase taxes or impose a new tax. It would authorize the City to continue to spend the proceeds of already-approved taxes for FY 2017 through 2020.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4255, "fingerprint": "2016|201600173|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600173|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2e503d063e15f9ed", "measure_id": "201600173", "measure_letter": "W1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to provide that the council district redistricting that occurs every ten years after the federal census shall be conducted by a citizens redistricting commission that is independent of the City Council?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48209, "no_votes": 6489, "total_votes": 54698, "percent_yes": 88.13667775787049, "percent_no": 11.863322242129513, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.249127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.659290", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to provide that the council district redistricting that occurs every ten years after the federal census shall be conducted by a citizens redistricting commission that is independent of the City Council?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4256, "fingerprint": "2016|201600174|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600174|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "607c754f95bdde2c", "measure_id": "201600174", "measure_letter": "X1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a City Charter amendment and ordinance to allocate approximately $500,000 annually from the General Fund, not to exceed $2,000,000 over any four years, to provide those candidates for Mayor and Council who only accept contributions of $50 or less per donor with a matching payment of six times the amount of each contribution from Berkeley residents, up to $120,000 per participating Mayoral candidate and $40,000 per participating Council candidate, be adopted?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33921, "no_votes": 18387, "total_votes": 52308, "percent_yes": 64.84858912594632, "percent_no": 35.15141087405368, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.249398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.659542", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a City Charter amendment and ordinance to allocate approximately $500,000 annually from the General Fund, not to exceed $2,000,000 over any four years, to provide those candidates for Mayor and Council who only accept contributions of $50 or less per donor with a matching payment of six times the amount of each contribution from Berkeley residents, up to $120,000 per participating Mayoral candidate and $40,000 per participating Council candidate, be adopted?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4257, "fingerprint": "2016|201600175|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600175|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5d56c4d37958b4a0", "measure_id": "201600175", "measure_letter": "Y1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Berkeley Charter be amended to authorize the City Council to allow persons aged 16 and 17 years old who would otherwise be eligible to vote, to vote for the office of School Director, provided no City funds could be used for any related expenses, such voting is technically workable and would not prevent consolidation with county elections, and would not result in any increased election costs to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38459, "no_votes": 16243, "total_votes": 54702, "percent_yes": 70.30638733501517, "percent_no": 29.693612664984826, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.249668", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.659760", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Berkeley Charter be amended to authorize the City Council to allow persons aged 16 and 17 years old who would otherwise be eligible to vote, to vote for the office of School Director, provided no City funds could be used for any related expenses, such voting is technically workable and would not prevent consolidation with county elections, and would not result in any increased election costs to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4266, "fingerprint": "2016|201600185|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600185|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8ce1d3fd1dd3b338", "measure_id": "201600185", "measure_letter": "Z1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall any federal, state or local public entity be empowered to develop, construct or acquire an additional 500 units of low-rent housing in the City of Berkeley for persons of low income?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44574, "no_votes": 8912, "total_votes": 53486, "percent_yes": 83.33769584564185, "percent_no": 16.662304154358154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.252545", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.662031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall any federal, state or local public entity be empowered to develop, construct or acquire an additional 500 units of low-rent housing in the City of Berkeley for persons of low income?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4275, "fingerprint": "2016|201600003|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600003|BUTTE", "content_hash": "b9fa03e94eafa39d", "measure_id": "201600003", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance entitled \"Ordinance Imposing a Ban on Hydraulic Fracturing Within Butte County\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45988, "no_votes": 17991, "total_votes": 63979, "percent_yes": 71.87983557104674, "percent_no": 28.12016442895326, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.257634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.667412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance entitled \"Ordinance Imposing a Ban on Hydraulic Fracturing Within Butte County\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4276, "fingerprint": "2016|201600004|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600004|BUTTE", "content_hash": "bc4c2444c24cc8dd", "measure_id": "201600004", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 4106, an Ordinance of the County of Butte amending Sections 35-2 and 35-5 to Chapter 35 of the Butte County Code entitled the \"Right to Farm Ordinance\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36074, "no_votes": 25801, "total_votes": 61875, "percent_yes": 58.30141414141414, "percent_no": 41.69858585858586, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.257903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.667629", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 4106, an Ordinance of the County of Butte amending Sections 35-2 and 35-5 to Chapter 35 of the Butte County Code entitled the \"Right to Farm Ordinance\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4277, "fingerprint": "2016|201600005|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600005|BUTTE", "content_hash": "7dbbf3516f14b7ff", "measure_id": "201600005", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 4107, an Ordinance of the County of Butte amending Sections 34A-2, 34A-3, 34A-4, 34A-13, 34A-16 AND 34A-19 of Chapter 34A of the Butte County Code, entitled \"Restrictions on Cultivation of Medical Marijuana\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36290, "no_votes": 27101, "total_votes": 63391, "percent_yes": 57.24787430392328, "percent_no": 42.75212569607672, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.258164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.667872", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 4107, an Ordinance of the County of Butte amending Sections 34A-2, 34A-3, 34A-4, 34A-13, 34A-16 AND 34A-19 of Chapter 34A of the Butte County Code, entitled \"Restrictions on Cultivation of Medical Marijuana\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4284, "fingerprint": "2016|201600559|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600559|BUTTE", "content_hash": "c9dde65c2121ffdc", "measure_id": "201600559", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms to improve safety and prepare students/ veterans for university transfer/careers, such as nursing, welding, emergency response, by upgrading aging classrooms/ technology, removing asbestos/ unsafe gas lines, improving water conservation, electrical wiring, security, constructing science, welding, public safety, Veterans facilities, and repairing, acquiring, constructing property, facilities/ equipment, shall Butte-Glenn Community College District issue $190,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizen oversight, all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60693, "no_votes": 29887, "total_votes": 90580, "percent_yes": 67.00485758445573, "percent_no": 32.995142415544265, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.260906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.669620", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms to improve safety and prepare students/ veterans for university transfer/careers, such as nursing, welding, emergency response, by upgrading aging classrooms/ technology, removing asbestos/ unsafe gas lines, improving water conservation, electrical wiring, security, constructing science, welding, public safety, Veterans facilities, and repairing, acquiring, constructing property, facilities/ equipment, shall Butte-Glenn Community College District issue $190,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizen oversight, all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4285, "fingerprint": "2016|201600560|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600560|BUTTE", "content_hash": "0beb6f468e370e76", "measure_id": "201600560", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local public education by preventing overcrowding at elementary schools and providing safe schools through repairing or replacing leaky roofs and outdated electrical and plumbing systems, upgrading, modernizing and constructing classrooms and science labs, improving student access to technology and improving access for students with disabilities shall Chico Unified School District issue $152,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens' oversight, audits, all funds staying local and NO money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32700, "no_votes": 13353, "total_votes": 46053, "percent_yes": 71.00514624454432, "percent_no": 28.99485375545568, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.261221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.669808", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local public education by preventing overcrowding at elementary schools and providing safe schools through repairing or replacing leaky roofs and outdated electrical and plumbing systems, upgrading, modernizing and constructing classrooms and science labs, improving student access to technology and improving access for students with disabilities shall Chico Unified School District issue $152,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens' oversight, audits, all funds staying local and NO money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4279, "fingerprint": "2016|201600007|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600007|BUTTE", "content_hash": "ae37406b24285747", "measure_id": "201600007", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance entitled \"Medical Cannabis Cultivation and Commerce\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40320, "no_votes": 50079, "total_votes": 90399, "percent_yes": 44.60226329937278, "percent_no": 55.39773670062722, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.258836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.668270", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance entitled \"Medical Cannabis Cultivation and Commerce\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4278, "fingerprint": "2016|201600006|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600006|BUTTE", "content_hash": "8d172075b533577a", "measure_id": "201600006", "measure_letter": "M1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an existing special property tax to fund standby costs of providing emergency room services at the Orchard Hospital, in the amount of $70 per residential equivalent unit per year for an additional ten years (vacant parcels and parcels without residential units shall not be subject to the tax) to raise approximately $330,000.00 per year, as enacted by Biggs Resolution 2016-14, and a corresponding increase in the City's spending limit, be approved?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1177, "no_votes": 1156, "total_votes": 2333, "percent_yes": 50.45006429489926, "percent_no": 49.54993570510074, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.258465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.668073", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an existing special property tax to fund standby costs of providing emergency room services at the Orchard Hospital, in the amount of $70 per residential equivalent unit per year for an additional ten years (vacant parcels and parcels without residential units shall not be subject to the tax) to raise approximately $330,000.00 per year, as enacted by Biggs Resolution 2016-14, and a corresponding increase in the City's spending limit, be approved?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11243, "fingerprint": "2016|201600188|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600188|BUTTE", "content_hash": "8d172075b533577a", "measure_id": "201600188", "measure_letter": "M2", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an existing special property tax to fund standby costs of providing emergency room services at the Orchard Hospital, in the amount of $70 per residential equivalent unit per year for an additional ten years (vacant parcels and parcels without residential units shall not be subject to the tax) to raise approximately $330,000.00 per year, as enacted by Biggs Resolution 2016-14, and a corresponding increase in the City's spending limit, be approved?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 235, "no_votes": 342, "total_votes": 577, "percent_yes": 40.72790294627383, "percent_no": 59.27209705372617, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.679702", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.259110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.668459", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an existing special property tax to fund standby costs of providing emergency room services at the Orchard Hospital, in the amount of $70 per residential equivalent unit per year for an additional ten years (vacant parcels and parcels without residential units shall not be subject to the tax) to raise approximately $330,000.00 per year, as enacted by Biggs Resolution 2016-14, and a corresponding increase in the City's spending limit, be approved?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11244, "fingerprint": "2016|201600189|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600189|BUTTE", "content_hash": "ea11a609cfe58e35", "measure_id": "201600189", "measure_letter": "M3", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an existing special property tax to fund standby costs of providing emergency room services at the Orchard Hospital, in the amount of $70 per residential equivalent unit per year for an additional ten years (vacant parcels and parcels without residential units shall not be subject to the tax) to raise approximately $330,000.00 per year, as enacted by Gridley Resolution 2016-R-020, and a corresponding increase in the City's spending limit, be approved?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1068, "no_votes": 980, "total_votes": 2048, "percent_yes": 52.1484375, "percent_no": 47.8515625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.679892", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.259392", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.668650", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an existing special property tax to fund standby costs of providing emergency room services at the Orchard Hospital, in the amount of $70 per residential equivalent unit per year for an additional ten years (vacant parcels and parcels without residential units shall not be subject to the tax) to raise approximately $330,000.00 per year, as enacted by Gridley Resolution 2016-R-020, and a corresponding increase in the City's spending limit, be approved?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4281, "fingerprint": "2016|201600191|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600191|BUTTE", "content_hash": "20c2427f1dfb0bbf", "measure_id": "201600191", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 602 of the Chico City Charter be amended to change the time of the City Council Meeting held on the first Tuesday in December of each even-numbered year from 7:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21821, "no_votes": 8884, "total_votes": 30705, "percent_yes": 71.06660153069532, "percent_no": 28.933398469304677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.260090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.669030", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 602 of the Chico City Charter be amended to change the time of the City Council Meeting held on the first Tuesday in December of each even-numbered year from 7:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4282, "fingerprint": "2016|201600192|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600192|BUTTE", "content_hash": "dc56acfa683b63cc", "measure_id": "201600192", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1110 of the Chico City Charter be amended to allow for notice of intention to receive proposals for public works contracts to be provided on the city's website or other approved methods?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25331, "no_votes": 5978, "total_votes": 31309, "percent_yes": 80.906448624996, "percent_no": 19.093551375003997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.260366", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.669214", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1110 of the Chico City Charter be amended to allow for notice of intention to receive proposals for public works contracts to be provided on the city's website or other approved methods?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4283, "fingerprint": "2016|201600193|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600193|BUTTE", "content_hash": "dc9a985e75db59fb", "measure_id": "201600193", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1114 of the Chico City Charter be amended to permit the council to contract with a newspaper for publication of legal notices and official advertisements without advertising for the contract when there is only one newspaper of general circulation in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20297, "no_votes": 10552, "total_votes": 30849, "percent_yes": 65.79467729910208, "percent_no": 34.20532270089792, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.260637", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.669395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1114 of the Chico City Charter be amended to permit the council to contract with a newspaper for publication of legal notices and official advertisements without advertising for the contract when there is only one newspaper of general circulation in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4286, "fingerprint": "2016|201600561|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600561|BUTTE", "content_hash": "e37fdf9f29f990b6", "measure_id": "201600561", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86, "no_votes": 117, "total_votes": 203, "percent_yes": 42.364532019704434, "percent_no": 57.635467980295566, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.261535", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.669991", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4280, "fingerprint": "2016|201600190|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600190|BUTTE", "content_hash": "55b8064d94435161", "measure_id": "201600190", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1816, a Temporary sales tax increase of one percent (1\u00a0%) generating approximately $3.6 million annually, that automatically expires in six years, and that establishes a citizen oversight committee to ensure that the funds are used to preserve public services such as police protection, fire suppression, vehicle repair and maintenance, finance analyst and human resources services for the City of Oroville, be adopted?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2250, "no_votes": 2934, "total_votes": 5184, "percent_yes": 43.40277777777778, "percent_no": 56.59722222222222, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.259728", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.668840", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1816, a Temporary sales tax increase of one percent (1\u00a0%) generating approximately $3.6 million annually, that automatically expires in six years, and that establishes a citizen oversight committee to ensure that the funds are used to preserve public services such as police protection, fire suppression, vehicle repair and maintenance, finance analyst and human resources services for the City of Oroville, be adopted?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4291, "fingerprint": "2016|201600012|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600012|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "2f86332fac077250", "measure_id": "201600012", "measure_letter": "5", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Steven Wayne Kearney be recalled (removed) from the office of County Supervisor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2536, "no_votes": 1645, "total_votes": 4181, "percent_yes": 60.65534561109782, "percent_no": 39.34465438890218, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.262935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.671420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Steven Wayne Kearney be recalled (removed) from the office of County Supervisor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4287, "fingerprint": "2016|201600008|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600008|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "6f6646aef474bbe6", "measure_id": "201600008", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on January 25, 2016 by the Calaveras Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the formation of a District in the territory described, known as the Calaveras County Resource Conservation District, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7642, "no_votes": 5248, "total_votes": 12890, "percent_yes": 59.286268425135766, "percent_no": 40.713731574864234, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.261807", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.670177", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on January 25, 2016 by the Calaveras Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the formation of a District in the territory described, known as the Calaveras County Resource Conservation District, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4288, "fingerprint": "2016|201600009|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600009|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "354f7c932b9027b5", "measure_id": "201600009", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Ordinance establishing a cannabis cultivation tax of $2.00 per square foot of licensed outdoor/mixed canopy area, increasing to $45.00 per pound maximum; and $5.00 per square foot of licensed indoor canopy area, increasing to $70.00 per pound maximum; and a gross proceeds tax of (7%) on the manufacturing of cultivated cannabis; and a gross proceeds tax of (7%) on medicinal or legal cannabis storefronts and collectives for general governmental purposes be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15302, "no_votes": 7488, "total_votes": 22790, "percent_yes": 67.1434839842036, "percent_no": 32.8565160157964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.262076", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.670385", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance establishing a cannabis cultivation tax of $2.00 per square foot of licensed outdoor/mixed canopy area, increasing to $45.00 per pound maximum; and $5.00 per square foot of licensed indoor canopy area, increasing to $70.00 per pound maximum; and a gross proceeds tax of (7%) on the manufacturing of cultivated cannabis; and a gross proceeds tax of (7%) on medicinal or legal cannabis storefronts and collectives for general governmental purposes be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4290, "fingerprint": "2016|201600011|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600011|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "ccc6b2b68adb5740", "measure_id": "201600011", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure to regulate the cultivation of cannabis for commercial and non-commercial activities within authorized zones in the unincorporated areas of Calaveras County be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10722, "no_votes": 12365, "total_votes": 23087, "percent_yes": 46.44172044873738, "percent_no": 53.55827955126262, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.262640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.670950", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure to regulate the cultivation of cannabis for commercial and non-commercial activities within authorized zones in the unincorporated areas of Calaveras County be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4289, "fingerprint": "2016|201600010|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600010|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "bb66d5552fc9ed9f", "measure_id": "201600010", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the parcel tax for parcels within the Middle River Community Service District increase from $100.00 to $200.00 per year for developed parcels and from $75.00 to $100.00 per year for undeveloped parcels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25, "no_votes": 24, "total_votes": 49, "percent_yes": 51.02040816326531, "percent_no": 48.97959183673469, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.262341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.670637", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the parcel tax for parcels within the Middle River Community Service District increase from $100.00 to $200.00 per year for developed parcels and from $75.00 to $100.00 per year for undeveloped parcels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4292, "fingerprint": "2016|201600194|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600194|COLUSA", "content_hash": "7145fa250b271136", "measure_id": "201600194", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the City of Colusa to increase the sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) by three-quarters of one percent for general municipal purposes for a period of seven years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 825, "no_votes": 1191, "total_votes": 2016, "percent_yes": 40.92261904761904, "percent_no": 59.07738095238096, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.263205", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.671717", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the City of Colusa to increase the sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) by three-quarters of one percent for general municipal purposes for a period of seven years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4294, "fingerprint": "2016|201600562|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600562|COLUSA", "content_hash": "c7c8ad723f726562", "measure_id": "201600562", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing, constructing and/or renovating classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; with funding that cannot be taken by the state; shall the Pierce Joint Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1097, "no_votes": 488, "total_votes": 1585, "percent_yes": 69.21135646687698, "percent_no": 30.78864353312302, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.263742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.672319", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing, constructing and/or renovating classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; with funding that cannot be taken by the state; shall the Pierce Joint Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4295, "fingerprint": "2016|201600563|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600563|COLUSA", "content_hash": "a8dc07d69e1c4cdc", "measure_id": "201600563", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; modernize, renovate and/or construct classrooms, restrooms, libraries, and school facilities; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; replace temporary portables; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Williams Unified School District issue $11,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 961, "no_votes": 370, "total_votes": 1331, "percent_yes": 72.20135236664163, "percent_no": 27.79864763335837, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.264014", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.672622", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; modernize, renovate and/or construct classrooms, restrooms, libraries, and school facilities; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; replace temporary portables; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Williams Unified School District issue $11,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4293, "fingerprint": "2016|201600564|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600564|COLUSA", "content_hash": "e37fdf9f29f990b6", "measure_id": "201600564", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3648, "no_votes": 2587, "total_votes": 6235, "percent_yes": 58.5084202085004, "percent_no": 41.4915797914996, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.263475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.672014", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11251, "fingerprint": "2016|201600566|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600566|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5c9bca306cee43c6", "measure_id": "201600566", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade aging classrooms and technology/science labs for career education to prepare students, veterans and workers for good jobs and university transfer, remove asbestos/retrofit buildings for earthquake safety, acquire, construct and repair sites/facilities/equipment, and improve campus safety/security, shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District issue $950,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, independent financial audits, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 207, "no_votes": 176, "total_votes": 383, "percent_yes": 54.04699738903395, "percent_no": 45.95300261096605, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.687425", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.270901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.680204", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade aging classrooms and technology/science labs for career education to prepare students, veterans and workers for good jobs and university transfer, remove asbestos/retrofit buildings for earthquake safety, acquire, construct and repair sites/facilities/equipment, and improve campus safety/security, shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District issue $950,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, independent financial audits, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4312, "fingerprint": "2016|201600211|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600211|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f6835b5d75954047", "measure_id": "201600211", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure Z passes, should the revenues raised be used to restore and enhance fire, emergency medical response, and other public safety services in the City of Brentwood?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16977, "no_votes": 5441, "total_votes": 22418, "percent_yes": 75.72932464983495, "percent_no": 24.27067535016505, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.269722", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.679082", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure Z passes, should the revenues raised be used to restore and enhance fire, emergency medical response, and other public safety services in the City of Brentwood?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4296, "fingerprint": "2016|201600013|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600013|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "c9ac6c8127701fb7", "measure_id": "201600013", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 169024, "no_votes": 88249, "total_votes": 257273, "percent_yes": 65.69830491345769, "percent_no": 34.30169508654231, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.264320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.672946", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11253, "fingerprint": "2016|201600565|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600565|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "96a0875ad8cc1e14", "measure_id": "201600565", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide Brentwood students with 21st century classrooms, upgrade libraries and science labs, improve school safety and security, expand access to classroom technology for students and teachers, renovate and modernize older schools in the District, build a new elementary school, and replace, acquire, construct and renovate school facilities, shall the Brentwood Union School District issue $158,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and no funds spent on administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7682, "no_votes": 5717, "total_votes": 13399, "percent_yes": 57.33263676393761, "percent_no": 42.66736323606239, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.687802", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.271454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.680808", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide Brentwood students with 21st century classrooms, upgrade libraries and science labs, improve school safety and security, expand access to classroom technology for students and teachers, renovate and modernize older schools in the District, build a new elementary school, and replace, acquire, construct and renovate school facilities, shall the Brentwood Union School District issue $158,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and no funds spent on administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4311, "fingerprint": "2016|201600210|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600210|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e7e1cafd52cd9d1a", "measure_id": "201600210", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To replace the 67 year old El Cerrito Library with a safe, energy efficient, 21st century library that meets earthquake and fire codes with space for a children's area for story times/books; public access computers/computer learning center; up-to-date book/resource collections; and improved senior/disabled access, shall El Cerrito issue $30,000,000 in bonds at legal rates for 33 years, as the Voter Guide describes, requiring independent citizen oversight, and all funds for El Cerrito Library?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7910, "no_votes": 4653, "total_votes": 12563, "percent_yes": 62.96266815251135, "percent_no": 37.03733184748865, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.269417", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.678789", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace the 67 year old El Cerrito Library with a safe, energy efficient, 21st century library that meets earthquake and fire codes with space for a children's area for story times/books; public access computers/computer learning center; up-to-date book/resource collections; and improved senior/disabled access, shall El Cerrito issue $30,000,000 in bonds at legal rates for 33 years, as the Voter Guide describes, requiring independent citizen oversight, and all funds for El Cerrito Library?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11254, "fingerprint": "2016|201600567|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600567|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "fbb2b58038528b59", "measure_id": "201600567", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade aging neighborhood elementary and middle schools, avoid overcrowding, and modernize classrooms for today\u2019s curriculum, including math, science, technology and arts, shall Lafayette School District repair or replace deteriorated roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems; update classrooms, labs and instructional technology; improve school safety/security: and acquire, construct, renovate, equip sites/facilities, by issuing $70,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds dedicated locally to Lafayette TK-8 schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8371, "no_votes": 2966, "total_votes": 11337, "percent_yes": 73.83787598130017, "percent_no": 26.162124018699828, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.687989", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.271736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.681093", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade aging neighborhood elementary and middle schools, avoid overcrowding, and modernize classrooms for today\u2019s curriculum, including math, science, technology and arts, shall Lafayette School District repair or replace deteriorated roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems; update classrooms, labs and instructional technology; improve school safety/security: and acquire, construct, renovate, equip sites/facilities, by issuing $70,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds dedicated locally to Lafayette TK-8 schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4308, "fingerprint": "2016|201600204|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600204|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "fac3f14a5c9fc4df", "measure_id": "201600204", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding that will stay 100% in Lafayette, to maintain the City\u2019s quality of life by funding general City services prioritizing: Protecting open space; Reducing downtown congestion; Enhancing police protection; Increasing downtown parking; Acquiring land for downtown parks; Revitalizing the historic Park theater; shall the ordinance enacting a general 1% sales tax, for 29 years, providing $3 million dollars annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent in Lafayette, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6002, "no_votes": 8352, "total_votes": 14354, "percent_yes": 41.81412846593284, "percent_no": 58.18587153406716, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.267723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.676799", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding that will stay 100% in Lafayette, to maintain the City\u2019s quality of life by funding general City services prioritizing: Protecting open space; Reducing downtown congestion; Enhancing police protection; Increasing downtown parking; Acquiring land for downtown parks; Revitalizing the historic Park theater; shall the ordinance enacting a general 1% sales tax, for 29 years, providing $3 million dollars annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent in Lafayette, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11255, "fingerprint": "2016|201600569|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600569|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "33ad77f0726f432b", "measure_id": "201600569", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To address critical renovation, modernization and safety needs at District schools, upgrade classrooms, libraries and computer networks to provide students with 21st Century classrooms, improve energy efficiency of classrooms and buildings, and replace, acquire, construct and renovate school facilities shall the Walnut Creek School District issue $60 million in bonds at legal interest rates with funds monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee and no funds spent on administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12912, "no_votes": 4756, "total_votes": 17668, "percent_yes": 73.08127688476341, "percent_no": 26.91872311523659, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.688174", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.272019", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.681430", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address critical renovation, modernization and safety needs at District schools, upgrade classrooms, libraries and computer networks to provide students with 21st Century classrooms, improve energy efficiency of classrooms and buildings, and replace, acquire, construct and renovate school facilities shall the Walnut Creek School District issue $60 million in bonds at legal interest rates with funds monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee and no funds spent on administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4309, "fingerprint": "2016|201600205|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600205|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6ab365e0cdb58998", "measure_id": "201600205", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding that stays in Martinez, to be used exclusively to improve and maintain the City\u2019s roadways, shall an ordinance which imposes a temporary, half-cent transaction and use (sales) tax for 15 years, providing an estimated $2.1 million annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight and annual audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12793, "no_votes": 4985, "total_votes": 17778, "percent_yes": 71.9597255034312, "percent_no": 28.0402744965688, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.268035", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.677130", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding that stays in Martinez, to be used exclusively to improve and maintain the City\u2019s roadways, shall an ordinance which imposes a temporary, half-cent transaction and use (sales) tax for 15 years, providing an estimated $2.1 million annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight and annual audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11245, "fingerprint": "2016|201600206|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600206|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "78545ff88dd4e7fb", "measure_id": "201600206", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and enhance essential City services, such as fire protection and emergency medical response services, shall an Ordinance be adopted to enact a three and one-half percent (3.5%) utility users tax on electricity, water, sewer, gas, and cable television to raise approximately two million dollars on an annual basis?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4294, "no_votes": 8737, "total_votes": 13031, "percent_yes": 32.95219092932238, "percent_no": 67.04780907067763, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.685733", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.268315", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.677509", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and enhance essential City services, such as fire protection and emergency medical response services, shall an Ordinance be adopted to enact a three and one-half percent (3.5%) utility users tax on electricity, water, sewer, gas, and cable television to raise approximately two million dollars on an annual basis?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4303, "fingerprint": "2016|201600199|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600199|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b940c04c1a412417", "measure_id": "201600199", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the electors adopt the Initiative Limiting Card Rooms Within the City and Requiring Voter Approval for New or Expanded Card Rooms Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12080, "no_votes": 6002, "total_votes": 18082, "percent_yes": 66.80676916270323, "percent_no": 33.19323083729677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.266356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.674995", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the electors adopt the Initiative Limiting Card Rooms Within the City and Requiring Voter Approval for New or Expanded Card Rooms Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11248, "fingerprint": "2016|201600212|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600212|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "9482806b3b19077e", "measure_id": "201600212", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure E passes, should the revenues raised be used to restore and enhance fire and emergency medical response services in the City of Oakley?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9181, "no_votes": 3274, "total_votes": 12455, "percent_yes": 73.7133681252509, "percent_no": 26.286631874749105, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.686854", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.270018", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.679355", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure E passes, should the revenues raised be used to restore and enhance fire and emergency medical response services in the City of Oakley?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4306, "fingerprint": "2016|201600202|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600202|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "0f6356d7580fba1b", "measure_id": "201600202", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6522, "no_votes": 11299, "total_votes": 17821, "percent_yes": 36.59727288030974, "percent_no": 63.40272711969026, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.267148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.676174", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11249, "fingerprint": "2016|201600213|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600213|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201600213", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7064, "no_votes": 12223, "total_votes": 19287, "percent_yes": 36.625706434385854, "percent_no": 63.374293565614146, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.687049", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.270284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.679635", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4299, "fingerprint": "2016|201600195|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600195|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "02fb866c2fe3189c", "measure_id": "201600195", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing Community Facility District 2007-1 (Trails and Landscape Maintenance District) be continued, with a Citizens Oversight Committee, for ten years to fund on-going operations and maintenance of the trails system, roadway landscape, open space weed abatement, and related expenses at the current annual special tax\u2019s rate and methodology (presently $234.84/year per residential and non-residential parcel or fraction thereof), for FYs 2017-2027?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3067, "no_votes": 804, "total_votes": 3871, "percent_yes": 79.23017308189098, "percent_no": 20.76982691810902, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.265165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.673821", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing Community Facility District 2007-1 (Trails and Landscape Maintenance District) be continued, with a Citizens Oversight Committee, for ten years to fund on-going operations and maintenance of the trails system, roadway landscape, open space weed abatement, and related expenses at the current annual special tax\u2019s rate and methodology (presently $234.84/year per residential and non-residential parcel or fraction thereof), for FYs 2017-2027?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11252, "fingerprint": "2016|201600568|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600568|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8851a5385621f27b", "measure_id": "201600568", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate aging Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District classrooms and school facilities with funding that the State can't take away; improve fire safety and security systems; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, restrooms and electrical systems; modernize outdated classrooms, science labs and instructional technology; upgrade, acquire, construct, equip classrooms/facilities and qualify for State matching funds, shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District issue $245 million in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits and public reports, no money for administrators, and keeping all funds local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56, "no_votes": 38, "total_votes": 94, "percent_yes": 59.57446808510638, "percent_no": 40.42553191489362, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.687615", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.271180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.680524", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate aging Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District classrooms and school facilities with funding that the State can't take away; improve fire safety and security systems; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, restrooms and electrical systems; modernize outdated classrooms, science labs and instructional technology; upgrade, acquire, construct, equip classrooms/facilities and qualify for State matching funds, shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District issue $245 million in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits and public reports, no money for administrators, and keeping all funds local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4310, "fingerprint": "2016|201600207|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600207|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "9e622796a010bd76", "measure_id": "201600207", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Pittsburg establish a marijuana business tax on all types of medical and non-medical marijuana businesses within the City, of no more than 10% of gross receipts of the business, generating no revenue unless the City amends the municipal code or State law is amended to authorize such businesses within City limits, and thereafter generating potentially greater than $100,000 annually, and which will continue until repealed by the City Council or City voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13693, "no_votes": 6364, "total_votes": 20057, "percent_yes": 68.2704292765618, "percent_no": 31.7295707234382, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.268602", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.677832", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Pittsburg establish a marijuana business tax on all types of medical and non-medical marijuana businesses within the City, of no more than 10% of gross receipts of the business, generating no revenue unless the City amends the municipal code or State law is amended to authorize such businesses within City limits, and thereafter generating potentially greater than $100,000 annually, and which will continue until repealed by the City Council or City voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11246, "fingerprint": "2016|201600208|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600208|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ff966491d4033bdf", "measure_id": "201600208", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide and maintain Pleasant Hill city services and facilities, including fixing potholes, and repairing neighborhood and city streets; replacing the aging library with a 21st century facility including space for after-school homework and tutoring; creating additional walking and biking paths; maintaining storm drains; and other city services; shall the City of Pleasant Hill levy a 1/2 cent sales tax, providing $4,000,000 annually for 20 years, providing locally controlled funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10772, "no_votes": 5284, "total_votes": 16056, "percent_yes": 67.09018435475834, "percent_no": 32.909815645241665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.686105", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.268869", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.678155", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide and maintain Pleasant Hill city services and facilities, including fixing potholes, and repairing neighborhood and city streets; replacing the aging library with a 21st century facility including space for after-school homework and tutoring; creating additional walking and biking paths; maintaining storm drains; and other city services; shall the City of Pleasant Hill levy a 1/2 cent sales tax, providing $4,000,000 annually for 20 years, providing locally controlled funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4300, "fingerprint": "2016|201600196|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600196|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f35961c37fa9aa15", "measure_id": "201600196", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To replace the small, outdated Oakley Library currently utilizing a portion of Freedom High School and construct and operate a new Library and Community Learning Center downtown, shall the ordinance establishing a $7.75 per month per parcel Library Development Tax be adopted, raising approximately one million one hundred thousand dollars annually, for thirty years starting fiscal year 2016/17, with independent financial audits ensuring funds are spent only on the Oakley Library and Community Learning Center?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3902, "no_votes": 3230, "total_votes": 7132, "percent_yes": 54.71116096466629, "percent_no": 45.28883903533371, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.265434", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.674125", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace the small, outdated Oakley Library currently utilizing a portion of Freedom High School and construct and operate a new Library and Community Learning Center downtown, shall the ordinance establishing a $7.75 per month per parcel Library Development Tax be adopted, raising approximately one million one hundred thousand dollars annually, for thirty years starting fiscal year 2016/17, with independent financial audits ensuring funds are spent only on the Oakley Library and Community Learning Center?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11250, "fingerprint": "2016|201600214|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600214|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6c47949cc2a0ee40", "measure_id": "201600214", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance to establish rent control, a rent board, and just cause for eviction requirements in the City of Richmond be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21380, "no_votes": 11378, "total_votes": 32758, "percent_yes": 65.26649978631174, "percent_no": 34.73350021368826, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.687235", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.270617", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.679915", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance to establish rent control, a rent board, and just cause for eviction requirements in the City of Richmond be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4302, "fingerprint": "2016|201600198|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600198|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d7598b0633df6660", "measure_id": "201600198", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To repair failing roads and storm drains, restore and upgrade other roadways and storm drains, fix potholes, and improve safety on Orinda public streets, shall the City of Orinda issue twenty five million dollars in bonds, with financial audits, public review of all expenditures, and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5441, "no_votes": 2504, "total_votes": 7945, "percent_yes": 68.48332284455633, "percent_no": 31.516677155443674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.266085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.674704", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair failing roads and storm drains, restore and upgrade other roadways and storm drains, fix potholes, and improve safety on Orinda public streets, shall the City of Orinda issue twenty five million dollars in bonds, with financial audits, public review of all expenditures, and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11247, "fingerprint": "2016|201600209|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600209|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7c9551f3cb25ae4a", "measure_id": "201600209", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance to amend the City of Richmond\u2019s Municipal Code to increase the City\u2019s Real Estate Documentary Transfer Tax from .7% to 1% and 1.5%, based on the property\u2019s sale price, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9287, "no_votes": 23198, "total_votes": 32485, "percent_yes": 28.58857934431276, "percent_no": 71.41142065568724, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.686293", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.269140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.678486", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance to amend the City of Richmond\u2019s Municipal Code to increase the City\u2019s Real Estate Documentary Transfer Tax from .7% to 1% and 1.5%, based on the property\u2019s sale price, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4301, "fingerprint": "2016|201600197|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600197|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b7f1d7fbaf94fae4", "measure_id": "201600197", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding that stays in Pittsburg and cannot be seized by the State, to be used for Public Safety, gang prevention, job creation programs for local residents, Senior Center operations, repair roads, operate youth programs, and maintain other City services, shall the City of Pittsburg extend its current half-cent sales tax through fiscal year 2034-2035, providing $3.6-$3.8 million annually, then the increase be terminated, altogether, with citizens\u2019 oversight, mandatory audits and consistent community reporting?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8631, "no_votes": 1950, "total_votes": 10581, "percent_yes": 81.57074000567054, "percent_no": 18.429259994329456, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.265781", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.674414", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding that stays in Pittsburg and cannot be seized by the State, to be used for Public Safety, gang prevention, job creation programs for local residents, Senior Center operations, repair roads, operate youth programs, and maintain other City services, shall the City of Pittsburg extend its current half-cent sales tax through fiscal year 2034-2035, providing $3.6-$3.8 million annually, then the increase be terminated, altogether, with citizens\u2019 oversight, mandatory audits and consistent community reporting?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4304, "fingerprint": "2016|201600200|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600200|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ded414b16d4c0cc7", "measure_id": "201600200", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance to amend the Richmond General Plan 2030 to allow a 59 unit single family detached project on a site south of the intersection of Marina Way South and Hall and approve a development agreement and related actions be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6898, "no_votes": 13532, "total_votes": 20430, "percent_yes": 33.76407244248653, "percent_no": 66.23592755751346, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.266622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.675292", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance to amend the Richmond General Plan 2030 to allow a 59 unit single family detached project on a site south of the intersection of Marina Way South and Hall and approve a development agreement and related actions be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4305, "fingerprint": "2016|201600201|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600201|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ff0edac944e01299", "measure_id": "201600201", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance to amend the Richmond Municipal Code requiring the City Manager to publicize compensation paid to exempt City service officials and employees, obligating the City Council to set annual compensation for City exempt service officials and employees and prohibiting the City Council from compensating the City Manager in excess of five times the median household income for the City be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9921, "no_votes": 10304, "total_votes": 20225, "percent_yes": 49.053152039555, "percent_no": 50.946847960445, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.266885", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.675857", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance to amend the Richmond Municipal Code requiring the City Manager to publicize compensation paid to exempt City service officials and employees, obligating the City Council to set annual compensation for City exempt service officials and employees and prohibiting the City Council from compensating the City Manager in excess of five times the median household income for the City be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4315, "fingerprint": "2016|201600572|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600572|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "42fc20d9533ba78d", "measure_id": "201600572", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new Carquinez Middle School at existing site/property that is seismically safe and supports modern learning standards in science, math, reading and arts; increase student access to classroom technology; improve student security; implement site renovations; equip classrooms and facilities; shall John Swett Unified School District issue $40,200,000 in bonds at rates within legal limits, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators, and all funds spent to benefit Carquinez Middle School and students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3373, "no_votes": 2056, "total_votes": 5429, "percent_yes": 62.129305581138325, "percent_no": 37.870694418861675, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.272909", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.682292", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new Carquinez Middle School at existing site/property that is seismically safe and supports modern learning standards in science, math, reading and arts; increase student access to classroom technology; improve student security; implement site renovations; equip classrooms and facilities; shall John Swett Unified School District issue $40,200,000 in bonds at rates within legal limits, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators, and all funds spent to benefit Carquinez Middle School and students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4316, "fingerprint": "2016|201600573|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600573|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ec540dddab6663d1", "measure_id": "201600573", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete renovation, modernization, and safety upgrades at John Swett High School that update classrooms, science labs, and career technical education facilities; improve student safety/security; provide for college/career readiness; and renovate, construct, and equip classrooms, facilities, sites and ventilation; shall John Swett Unified School District issue $22,000,000 in bonds at rates within legal limits, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators, and all funds spent to benefit John Swett High school and students?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3570, "no_votes": 1851, "total_votes": 5421, "percent_yes": 65.85500830105147, "percent_no": 34.14499169894853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.273214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.682583", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete renovation, modernization, and safety upgrades at John Swett High School that update classrooms, science labs, and career technical education facilities; improve student safety/security; provide for college/career readiness; and renovate, construct, and equip classrooms, facilities, sites and ventilation; shall John Swett Unified School District issue $22,000,000 in bonds at rates within legal limits, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators, and all funds spent to benefit John Swett High school and students?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4318, "fingerprint": "2016|201600575|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600575|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b3af8d89125ec50d", "measure_id": "201600575", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize, construct and/or renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities at elementary schools; improve student access to modern technology; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; construct career/technical education classrooms, including science labs; and replace leaky roofs, shall the Martinez Unified School District issue $120,000,000 of bonds, at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for teacher or administrator salaries and all funds locally-controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9287, "no_votes": 4427, "total_votes": 13714, "percent_yes": 67.71911914831558, "percent_no": 32.280880851684415, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.273808", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.683173", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize, construct and/or renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities at elementary schools; improve student access to modern technology; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; construct career/technical education classrooms, including science labs; and replace leaky roofs, shall the Martinez Unified School District issue $120,000,000 of bonds, at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for teacher or administrator salaries and all funds locally-controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4313, "fingerprint": "2016|201600570|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600570|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "91c77fecb84c869e", "measure_id": "201600570", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide a stable, local funding source for art, music and athletic essential program equipment and materials, to attract and retain highly qualified teachers and staff, to enhance and expand access to art, music and athletic programs, shall Pittsburg Unified School District levy an annual tax of $91 per taxable parcel (approximately $1,200,000) for seven years, beginning 7/1/2017 with an annual inflation adjustment of $6, with citizen oversight and senior citizen, SSI and SSDI exemptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11292, "no_votes": 5321, "total_votes": 16613, "percent_yes": 67.970866189129, "percent_no": 32.029133810871, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.272297", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.681721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a stable, local funding source for art, music and athletic essential program equipment and materials, to attract and retain highly qualified teachers and staff, to enhance and expand access to art, music and athletic programs, shall Pittsburg Unified School District levy an annual tax of $91 per taxable parcel (approximately $1,200,000) for seven years, beginning 7/1/2017 with an annual inflation adjustment of $6, with citizen oversight and senior citizen, SSI and SSDI exemptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4314, "fingerprint": "2016|201600571|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600571|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5498bbdbf614354b", "measure_id": "201600571", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education with local funding the State cannot take, including: protecting core academics, reading, writing, math, and science, attracting and retaining quality teachers, supporting science lab materials and activities, providing lower class sizes, preparing students for college and the workforce, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District extend the existing school funding measure for 8 years, at the current 7.2 cents per square foot of building area, providing $9.8 million annually, exempting seniors and requiring independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64358, "no_votes": 19956, "total_votes": 84314, "percent_yes": 76.33133287473018, "percent_no": 23.66866712526982, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.272634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.682001", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education with local funding the State cannot take, including: protecting core academics, reading, writing, math, and science, attracting and retaining quality teachers, supporting science lab materials and activities, providing lower class sizes, preparing students for college and the workforce, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District extend the existing school funding measure for 8 years, at the current 7.2 cents per square foot of building area, providing $9.8 million annually, exempting seniors and requiring independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4317, "fingerprint": "2016|201600574|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600574|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "066fb642fe23f4d7", "measure_id": "201600574", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide educational facilities and equipment to support advanced courses in math, science, engineering, arts and technology, modernize aging science labs, computer systems and career educational facilities, repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems, add classrooms and facilities including those relieving overcrowding, and to improve the likelihood of local high schools qualifying for state matching funds, shall Liberty Union High School District issue $122 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26237, "no_votes": 16745, "total_votes": 42982, "percent_yes": 61.04183146433391, "percent_no": 38.95816853566609, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.273533", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.682879", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide educational facilities and equipment to support advanced courses in math, science, engineering, arts and technology, modernize aging science labs, computer systems and career educational facilities, repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems, add classrooms and facilities including those relieving overcrowding, and to improve the likelihood of local high schools qualifying for state matching funds, shall Liberty Union High School District issue $122 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4319, "fingerprint": "2016|201600576|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600576|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d77ea7c7304b8c7e", "measure_id": "201600576", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Moraga schools with funding that cannot be taken away by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to modern technology; modernize, renovate and/or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and make health, seismic, safety and security improvements; shall Moraga Elementary School District issue $33,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and NO money used for administrative salaries?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6252, "no_votes": 2348, "total_votes": 8600, "percent_yes": 72.69767441860465, "percent_no": 27.30232558139535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.274083", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.683456", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Moraga schools with funding that cannot be taken away by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to modern technology; modernize, renovate and/or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and make health, seismic, safety and security improvements; shall Moraga Elementary School District issue $33,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and NO money used for administrative salaries?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4320, "fingerprint": "2016|201600577|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600577|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7303c4852ec886ba", "measure_id": "201600577", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local schools with funding that cannot be taken away by the State; add classrooms and school facilities to prevent overcrowding; provide classroom instructional technology; improve science, math/engineering classrooms; repair, construct, replace/update classrooms/educational facilities; and qualify for state matching funds, shall Oakley Union Elementary School District issue $31 million in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7855, "no_votes": 4275, "total_votes": 12130, "percent_yes": 64.75680131904369, "percent_no": 35.24319868095631, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.274392", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.683738", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local schools with funding that cannot be taken away by the State; add classrooms and school facilities to prevent overcrowding; provide classroom instructional technology; improve science, math/engineering classrooms; repair, construct, replace/update classrooms/educational facilities; and qualify for state matching funds, shall Oakley Union Elementary School District issue $31 million in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4297, "fingerprint": "2016|201600014|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600014|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "71f9ffb7a33347a0", "measure_id": "201600014", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To implement a Transportation Expenditure Plan to continue: Repairing potholes/fixing roads; Improving BART capacity/reliability; Improving Highways 680, 80, 24, and 4; Enhancing bus/transit including for seniors and people with disabilities; Increasing bicycle/pedestrian safety; Improving air quality; Reducing traffic; shall voters adopt the ordinance augmenting the sales tax by \u00bd%, raising ninety-seven million dollars for transportation improvements annually for 30 years with independent oversight, audits, and all money benefitting local residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 278098, "no_votes": 160165, "total_votes": 438263, "percent_yes": 63.45459233382695, "percent_no": 36.54540766617305, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.264627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.673241", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To implement a Transportation Expenditure Plan to continue: Repairing potholes/fixing roads; Improving BART capacity/reliability; Improving Highways 680, 80, 24, and 4; Enhancing bus/transit including for seniors and people with disabilities; Increasing bicycle/pedestrian safety; Improving air quality; Reducing traffic; shall voters adopt the ordinance augmenting the sales tax by \u00bd%, raising ninety-seven million dollars for transportation improvements annually for 30 years with independent oversight, audits, and all money benefitting local residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4298, "fingerprint": "2016|201600015|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600015|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "05445215c3666726", "measure_id": "201600015", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area R-7A (Alamo Parks and Recreation) be increased to $1,650,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the Fiscal Years 2015/2016 through 2018/2019 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5721, "no_votes": 2334, "total_votes": 8055, "percent_yes": 71.024208566108, "percent_no": 28.975791433892, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.264895", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.673539", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area R-7A (Alamo Parks and Recreation) be increased to $1,650,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the Fiscal Years 2015/2016 through 2018/2019 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4307, "fingerprint": "2016|201600203|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600203|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7bd1b1fd24ee60c7", "measure_id": "201600203", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and enhance essential City services, such as fire and emergency medical response, shall an Ordinance be adopted to enact a utility users tax on telecommunications, electricity, gas, and cable television phasing in over two years (3% in 2017 and an additional 3% in 2018, for a total of 6%) to ultimately raise ongoing funding of approximately $6.1 million each year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8988, "no_votes": 13979, "total_votes": 22967, "percent_yes": 39.13441024078025, "percent_no": 60.86558975921975, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.267414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.676481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and enhance essential City services, such as fire and emergency medical response, shall an Ordinance be adopted to enact a utility users tax on telecommunications, electricity, gas, and cable television phasing in over two years (3% in 2017 and an additional 3% in 2018, for a total of 6%) to ultimately raise ongoing funding of approximately $6.1 million each year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4321, "fingerprint": "2016|201600215|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600215|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "cc95b935b994a52b", "measure_id": "201600215", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to financially support the operation, maintenance, capital improvements and debt service of the City\u2019s sewer utility, shall Ordinance No. 792 be adopted to amend Chapter 13.30, Sewer Charges, of Title 13 Public Services of the Crescent City Municipal Code to (1) implement a consumption-based rate structure and (2) to provide for a net revenue increase of 5% to the City each year for the next four fiscal years (FYE 2017 through 2020)? (A \u201cyes\u201d vote approves the ordinance; a \u201cno\u201d vote disapproves the ordinance.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 483, "no_votes": 641, "total_votes": 1124, "percent_yes": 42.97153024911032, "percent_no": 57.02846975088968, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.274704", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.684043", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to financially support the operation, maintenance, capital improvements and debt service of the City\u2019s sewer utility, shall Ordinance No. 792 be adopted to amend Chapter 13.30, Sewer Charges, of Title 13 Public Services of the Crescent City Municipal Code to (1) implement a consumption-based rate structure and (2) to provide for a net revenue increase of 5% to the City each year for the next four fiscal years (FYE 2017 through 2020)? (A \u201cyes\u201d vote approves the ordinance; a \u201cno\u201d vote disapproves the ordinance.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4322, "fingerprint": "2016|201600016|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600016|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "b2ded1f6a0800f28", "measure_id": "201600016", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Preamble of the El Dorado County Charter, be amended, to change the wording of the introductary statement of the County Charter, the Preamble, to reflect a new statement of intent and purpose of the Charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28454, "no_votes": 25260, "total_votes": 53714, "percent_yes": 52.97315411252187, "percent_no": 47.02684588747813, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.274981", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.684339", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Preamble of the El Dorado County Charter, be amended, to change the wording of the introductary statement of the County Charter, the Preamble, to reflect a new statement of intent and purpose of the Charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4324, "fingerprint": "2016|201600018|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600018|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "b8093d76e9109714", "measure_id": "201600018", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the General Plan be amended to change the zoning of approximately 3100 acres adjacent to Cameron Estates, known as Marble Valley and Lime Rock Valley, to increase the maximum number of allowable dwelling units from 400 to approximately 4,035 dwelling units?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33, "no_votes": 382, "total_votes": 415, "percent_yes": 7.951807228915659, "percent_no": 92.04819277108435, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.275520", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.684947", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the General Plan be amended to change the zoning of approximately 3100 acres adjacent to Cameron Estates, known as Marble Valley and Lime Rock Valley, to increase the maximum number of allowable dwelling units from 400 to approximately 4,035 dwelling units?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4338, "fingerprint": "2016|201600579|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600579|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "0563aefbeda33f6c", "measure_id": "201600579", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety, campus security, access for students with disabilities, and pick up and drop off zones to reduce traffic congestion; replace, repair and update aging classrooms and school facilities, including repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems; remove asbestos and lead paint; and improve instructional technology and educational opportunities for students, shall the Mother Lode Union School District issue $7,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3250, "no_votes": 2344, "total_votes": 5594, "percent_yes": 58.09796210225241, "percent_no": 41.90203789774759, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.279789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.689174", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety, campus security, access for students with disabilities, and pick up and drop off zones to reduce traffic congestion; replace, repair and update aging classrooms and school facilities, including repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems; remove asbestos and lead paint; and improve instructional technology and educational opportunities for students, shall the Mother Lode Union School District issue $7,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4325, "fingerprint": "2016|201600019|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600019|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "77a924f3927fcb80", "measure_id": "201600019", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance be adopted amending the El Dorado County General Plan to (1) change when and how El Dorado County mitigates impacts to traffic levels of service, (2) impose restrictions on use of tax revenue and mitigation fees and on formation of infrastructure financing districts, and (3) require El Dorado County to make findings of compliance with those policies prior to approving any residential development project of five or more units, as more fully described in the proposed ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31406, "no_votes": 28583, "total_votes": 59989, "percent_yes": 52.3529313707513, "percent_no": 47.6470686292487, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.276033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.685219", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance be adopted amending the El Dorado County General Plan to (1) change when and how El Dorado County mitigates impacts to traffic levels of service, (2) impose restrictions on use of tax revenue and mitigation fees and on formation of infrastructure financing districts, and (3) require El Dorado County to make findings of compliance with those policies prior to approving any residential development project of five or more units, as more fully described in the proposed ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4326, "fingerprint": "2016|201600020|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600020|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "8e0baf3f9bc0f1aa", "measure_id": "201600020", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance be adopted to (1) add, amend, or delete fifteen distinct policies in the El Dorado County General Plan concerning land use, agriculture, mixed use, cultural and historical resources, and water supply and (2) preclude El Dorado County from approving any future discretionary project until it implements twelve enumerated General Plan policies related to community design guidelines, cultural and historical resources, water supply, and scenic corridors, as more fully described in the proposed ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29489, "no_votes": 30242, "total_votes": 59731, "percent_yes": 49.36967403860642, "percent_no": 50.63032596139358, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.276393", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.685505", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance be adopted to (1) add, amend, or delete fifteen distinct policies in the El Dorado County General Plan concerning land use, agriculture, mixed use, cultural and historical resources, and water supply and (2) preclude El Dorado County from approving any future discretionary project until it implements twelve enumerated General Plan policies related to community design guidelines, cultural and historical resources, water supply, and scenic corridors, as more fully described in the proposed ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4337, "fingerprint": "2016|201600578|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600578|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a07f29dfe829b47d", "measure_id": "201600578", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To meet critical health and safety needs at Camino schools, replace old restrooms, failing water and sewer lines and aged infrastructure, reconstruct the parking lot, improve student support facilities and make basic repairs including replacing windows and fixing outdated electrical infrastructure, shall Camino Union School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with an Oversight Committee and annual audits ensuring funds are ONLY spent improving LOCAL school facilities and NOT for salaries or any other purpose?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1404, "no_votes": 565, "total_votes": 1969, "percent_yes": 71.30523108176739, "percent_no": 28.69476891823261, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.279488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.688937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To meet critical health and safety needs at Camino schools, replace old restrooms, failing water and sewer lines and aged infrastructure, reconstruct the parking lot, improve student support facilities and make basic repairs including replacing windows and fixing outdated electrical infrastructure, shall Camino Union School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with an Oversight Committee and annual audits ensuring funds are ONLY spent improving LOCAL school facilities and NOT for salaries or any other purpose?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4323, "fingerprint": "2016|201600017|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600017|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "f429377ebeaec7b1", "measure_id": "201600017", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall section 210 c. of the El Dorado County Charter be deleted from the Charter because the substance of the section is now covered by general law after passage of\u00a0Proposition 218\u00a0in November 1996?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33665, "no_votes": 19529, "total_votes": 53194, "percent_yes": 63.28721284355379, "percent_no": 36.71278715644621, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.275251", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.684662", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 210 c. of the El Dorado County Charter be deleted from the Charter because the substance of the section is now covered by general law after passage of\u00a0Proposition 218\u00a0in November 1996?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4327, "fingerprint": "2016|201600021|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600021|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "732efe9f7013923f", "measure_id": "201600021", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Cameron Estates Community Services District levy a special tax for the purpose of providing needed road improvements, upgrades, and maintenance at an annual rate not to exceed an increase of $150.00 per year parcel over and above the current rate, for a total not to exceed $400.00 per parcel year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 273, "no_votes": 189, "total_votes": 462, "percent_yes": 59.09090909090909, "percent_no": 40.90909090909091, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.276707", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.685950", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Cameron Estates Community Services District levy a special tax for the purpose of providing needed road improvements, upgrades, and maintenance at an annual rate not to exceed an increase of $150.00 per year parcel over and above the current rate, for a total not to exceed $400.00 per parcel year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4330, "fingerprint": "2016|201600216|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600216|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "c18df328f4c2d0d9", "measure_id": "201600216", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For the sole purpose of fixing Placerville's roads and pipes, shall the City of Placerville enact a 1/2 cent sales tax for 20 years to fill potholes, repair, replace and maintain existing streets and to repair, replace and maintain water, sewer and storm drain systems, providing approximately $2 million annually and requiring a citizen oversight committee with all revenue spent exclusively in Placerville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3457, "no_votes": 1110, "total_votes": 4567, "percent_yes": 75.69520472958177, "percent_no": 24.304795270418225, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.277559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.686967", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the sole purpose of fixing Placerville's roads and pipes, shall the City of Placerville enact a 1/2 cent sales tax for 20 years to fill potholes, repair, replace and maintain existing streets and to repair, replace and maintain water, sewer and storm drain systems, providing approximately $2 million annually and requiring a citizen oversight committee with all revenue spent exclusively in Placerville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4328, "fingerprint": "2016|201600022|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600022|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "76bece9981a1f646", "measure_id": "201600022", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Hickock Road Community Services district increase the current annual special tax to fund maintaining, upgrading, and improving District roads by $100 per parcel year such that the total tax will increase from $200 to $300 per parcel year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32, "no_votes": 44, "total_votes": 76, "percent_yes": 42.105263157894726, "percent_no": 57.894736842105274, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.276975", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.686391", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Hickock Road Community Services district increase the current annual special tax to fund maintaining, upgrading, and improving District roads by $100 per parcel year such that the total tax will increase from $200 to $300 per parcel year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4329, "fingerprint": "2016|201600023|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600023|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "d606503992f61101", "measure_id": "201600023", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Marble Mountain Community Services District be authorized to annually assess each parcel of real property located within the District which is not included within the boundaries of Road Improvement Zone \"1\" a special tax in an amount up to, but not exceeding, the amount of $400 per parcel to be extended for the maintenance and improvement of roadways located in those areas of the Districy lying outside of Road Improvement Zone '1'?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72, "no_votes": 38, "total_votes": 110, "percent_yes": 65.45454545454545, "percent_no": 34.54545454545455, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.277241", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.686675", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Marble Mountain Community Services District be authorized to annually assess each parcel of real property located within the District which is not included within the boundaries of Road Improvement Zone \"1\" a special tax in an amount up to, but not exceeding, the amount of $400 per parcel to be extended for the maintenance and improvement of roadways located in those areas of the Districy lying outside of Road Improvement Zone '1'?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4331, "fingerprint": "2016|201600217|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600217|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a07239715fb6036b", "measure_id": "201600217", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be adopted that increases the amount of transient occupancy tax two (2) percent city wide be utilized only for the special purpose of constructing, operation and maintenance of recreational facilities, specifically including the construction of a recreational complex as set forth in the Recreation Master Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4487, "no_votes": 2044, "total_votes": 6531, "percent_yes": 68.70310825294747, "percent_no": 31.296891747052527, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.277858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.687245", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be adopted that increases the amount of transient occupancy tax two (2) percent city wide be utilized only for the special purpose of constructing, operation and maintenance of recreational facilities, specifically including the construction of a recreational complex as set forth in the Recreation Master Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4333, "fingerprint": "2016|201600219|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600219|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "81e4c27639e8836d", "measure_id": "201600219", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the revenue derived from the ordinance that increases the amount of transaction and use tax by one half (1/2) percent be expended on housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2830, "no_votes": 3376, "total_votes": 6206, "percent_yes": 45.6010312600709, "percent_no": 54.3989687399291, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.278389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.687820", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the revenue derived from the ordinance that increases the amount of transaction and use tax by one half (1/2) percent be expended on housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4334, "fingerprint": "2016|201600220|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600220|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "51ed2f13055765ef", "measure_id": "201600220", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the revenue derived from the ordinance that increases the amount of transaction and use tax by one half (1/2) be expended on road construction and maintenance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4202, "no_votes": 2057, "total_votes": 6259, "percent_yes": 67.13532513181019, "percent_no": 32.86467486818981, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.278656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.688108", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the revenue derived from the ordinance that increases the amount of transaction and use tax by one half (1/2) be expended on road construction and maintenance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4335, "fingerprint": "2016|201600221|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600221|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "c35671efe6a5665c", "measure_id": "201600221", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the revenue derived from the ordinance that increases the amount of transaction and use tax by one half (1/2) be expended on city hall, city facilities and equipment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1573, "no_votes": 4621, "total_votes": 6194, "percent_yes": 25.395544074911204, "percent_no": 74.6044559250888, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.278920", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.688404", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the revenue derived from the ordinance that increases the amount of transaction and use tax by one half (1/2) be expended on city hall, city facilities and equipment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4336, "fingerprint": "2016|201600222|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600222|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a3f54a5fdd8f14d3", "measure_id": "201600222", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe be prohibited from \"approving or supporting\" the Tahoe Transportation District project known as \"the US 50/South Shore Community Revitalization Project?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3879, "no_votes": 2592, "total_votes": 6471, "percent_yes": 59.944367176634216, "percent_no": 40.055632823365784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.279185", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.688671", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe be prohibited from \"approving or supporting\" the Tahoe Transportation District project known as \"the US 50/South Shore Community Revitalization Project?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4332, "fingerprint": "2016|201600218|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600218|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a4b39835e0698319", "measure_id": "201600218", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that increases the amount of transaction and use tax from one half (1/2) percent to one (1) percent, with the increased revenue derived from the one half (1/2) percent increase to be devoted to the public purpose as determined by the companion advisory vote?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2671, "no_votes": 3547, "total_votes": 6218, "percent_yes": 42.95593438404632, "percent_no": 57.04406561595368, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.278124", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.687527", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that increases the amount of transaction and use tax from one half (1/2) percent to one (1) percent, with the increased revenue derived from the one half (1/2) percent increase to be devoted to the public purpose as determined by the companion advisory vote?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4350, "fingerprint": "2016|201600580|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600580|FRESNO", "content_hash": "8f1cc647e922a2ab", "measure_id": "201600580", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall NANCY SCHWABENLAND be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Raisin City Elementary School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 152, "no_votes": 88, "total_votes": 240, "percent_yes": 63.33333333333333, "percent_no": 36.66666666666667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.283346", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.691666", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall NANCY SCHWABENLAND be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Raisin City Elementary School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4351, "fingerprint": "2016|201600581|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600581|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3da637ea07878e47", "measure_id": "201600581", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall FEDERICO GARCIA be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Raisin City Elementary School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 158, "no_votes": 78, "total_votes": 236, "percent_yes": 66.94915254237289, "percent_no": 33.050847457627114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.283612", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.691894", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall FEDERICO GARCIA be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Raisin City Elementary School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4352, "fingerprint": "2016|201600582|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600582|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d8d2dbfd892799b4", "measure_id": "201600582", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall ANTHONY MONREAL be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Raisin City Elementary School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 158, "no_votes": 78, "total_votes": 236, "percent_yes": 66.94915254237289, "percent_no": 33.050847457627114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.283874", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.692094", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ANTHONY MONREAL be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Raisin City Elementary School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4353, "fingerprint": "2016|201600583|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600583|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f9cf59101a2921c1", "measure_id": "201600583", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall EVANGELINA URIAS be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Raisin City Elementary School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 106, "no_votes": 133, "total_votes": 239, "percent_yes": 44.35146443514644, "percent_no": 55.64853556485356, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.284136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.692293", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall EVANGELINA URIAS be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Raisin City Elementary School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11258, "fingerprint": "2016|201600594|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600594|FRESNO", "content_hash": "2492215f5c934cdc", "measure_id": "201600594", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality neighborhood schools and retain/attract qualified teachers by: (1) Expanding, upgrading constructing and equipping classrooms, including vocational/job training, and computer/science labs for Sanger students; (2) Repairing deteriorating classrooms/bathrooms; and (3) Upgrading disabled accessibility, security, fire safety; Shall Sanger Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all money used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11693, "no_votes": 4191, "total_votes": 15884, "percent_yes": 73.61495844875347, "percent_no": 26.38504155124653, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.702007", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.287326", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.694657", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality neighborhood schools and retain/attract qualified teachers by: (1) Expanding, upgrading constructing and equipping classrooms, including vocational/job training, and computer/science labs for Sanger students; (2) Repairing deteriorating classrooms/bathrooms; and (3) Upgrading disabled accessibility, security, fire safety; Shall Sanger Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all money used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4354, "fingerprint": "2016|201600585|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600585|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b53a2d5121f395da", "measure_id": "201600585", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education without increasing the current tax rate; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and security improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Kingsburg Elementary Charter School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2039, "no_votes": 960, "total_votes": 2999, "percent_yes": 67.9893297765922, "percent_no": 32.0106702234078, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.284700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.692788", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education without increasing the current tax rate; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and security improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Kingsburg Elementary Charter School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11257, "fingerprint": "2016|201600588|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600588|FRESNO", "content_hash": "1487019fc3388939", "measure_id": "201600588", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue renovating, constructing and equipping existing classrooms/school facilities, building a new high school and elementary school, and to be eligible for State matching funds, shall $87,300,000 of Central Unified School District bonds, an amount previously approved by voters in 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates within legal limits, annual audits, citizen oversight, all funds spent on local schools and no money for administrator salaries?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15060, "no_votes": 6055, "total_votes": 21115, "percent_yes": 71.32370352829741, "percent_no": 28.676296471702585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.700058", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.285578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.693397", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue renovating, constructing and equipping existing classrooms/school facilities, building a new high school and elementary school, and to be eligible for State matching funds, shall $87,300,000 of Central Unified School District bonds, an amount previously approved by voters in 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates within legal limits, annual audits, citizen oversight, all funds spent on local schools and no money for administrator salaries?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4355, "fingerprint": "2016|201600586|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600586|FRESNO", "content_hash": "67902832408092c7", "measure_id": "201600586", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Fresno City, Clovis, Reedley Colleges, to prepare students and veterans for jobs/ university transfer by upgrading classroom buildings, labs/technology, upgrading vocational/career education programs, removing lead paint/asbestos, repairing leaky roofs, wiring, gas/sewer lines and acquiring, construct/repairing facilities, sites/equipment, shall State Center Community College District issue $485,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 104811, "no_votes": 51559, "total_votes": 156370, "percent_yes": 67.02756283174523, "percent_no": 32.97243716825477, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.285009", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.692992", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Fresno City, Clovis, Reedley Colleges, to prepare students and veterans for jobs/ university transfer by upgrading classroom buildings, labs/technology, upgrading vocational/career education programs, removing lead paint/asbestos, repairing leaky roofs, wiring, gas/sewer lines and acquiring, construct/repairing facilities, sites/equipment, shall State Center Community College District issue $485,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4349, "fingerprint": "2016|201600231|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600231|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3ed4e9d4b6a89a90", "measure_id": "201600231", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance establishing term limits for Coalinga City Council members be adopted, effective with the November 2018 Council election, as follows: no person shall serve more than two consecutive four-year terms, either by election or appointment, and following a minimum two year absence, a new two consecutive four-year term limit shall apply?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2374, "no_votes": 721, "total_votes": 3095, "percent_yes": 76.70436187399031, "percent_no": 23.295638126009692, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.283081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.691281", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance establishing term limits for Coalinga City Council members be adopted, effective with the November 2018 Council election, as follows: no person shall serve more than two consecutive four-year terms, either by election or appointment, and following a minimum two year absence, a new two consecutive four-year term limit shall apply?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11256, "fingerprint": "2016|201600584|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600584|FRESNO", "content_hash": "37ab0e943a393a04", "measure_id": "201600584", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; renovate/construct science labs and career technical education classrooms; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $16,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45, "no_votes": 79, "total_votes": 124, "percent_yes": 36.29032258064516, "percent_no": 63.70967741935484, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.698776", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.284408", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.692535", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; renovate/construct science labs and career technical education classrooms; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $16,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4341, "fingerprint": "2016|201600223|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600223|FRESNO", "content_hash": "02108c571164e86d", "measure_id": "201600223", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Coalinga implement an annual tax of twenty-five ($25.00) per square foot  for the first 3,000 square feet and then ten dollars ($10.00) per square foot for the remaining space utilized in connection with each commercial marijuana operation, as set forth in Ordinance no. 789?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1903, "no_votes": 1192, "total_votes": 3095, "percent_yes": 61.48626817447496, "percent_no": 38.51373182552504, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.280634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.689784", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Coalinga implement an annual tax of twenty-five ($25.00) per square foot  for the first 3,000 square feet and then ten dollars ($10.00) per square foot for the remaining space utilized in connection with each commercial marijuana operation, as set forth in Ordinance no. 789?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4342, "fingerprint": "2016|201600224|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600224|FRESNO", "content_hash": "5f6ba947bfbeabac", "measure_id": "201600224", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Coalinga authorize and regulate a single marijuana dispensary to be located in the City of Coalinga and, if authorized, impose a dispensary gross receipts tax, as set forth in Ordinance no. 789?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1676, "no_votes": 1442, "total_votes": 3118, "percent_yes": 53.75240538806928, "percent_no": 46.24759461193072, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.280999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.689973", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Coalinga authorize and regulate a single marijuana dispensary to be located in the City of Coalinga and, if authorized, impose a dispensary gross receipts tax, as set forth in Ordinance no. 789?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4358, "fingerprint": "2016|201600590|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600590|FRESNO", "content_hash": "70965ab659c48d0e", "measure_id": "201600590", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging classrooms; remove asbestos/lead paint; upgrade school safety/security; water conservation/ recycling systems; improve agricultural education; technology, computer/science labs, vocational programs; repair, construct/retrofit classrooms, sites/equipment; maintain student health/safety and retain/attract quality teachers, shall Firebaugh-Las Deltas Unified School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no administrator salaries, preventing Sacramento from taking funds, and keeping all funds local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1238, "no_votes": 254, "total_votes": 1492, "percent_yes": 82.97587131367293, "percent_no": 17.024128686327074, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.286230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.693825", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging classrooms; remove asbestos/lead paint; upgrade school safety/security; water conservation/ recycling systems; improve agricultural education; technology, computer/science labs, vocational programs; repair, construct/retrofit classrooms, sites/equipment; maintain student health/safety and retain/attract quality teachers, shall Firebaugh-Las Deltas Unified School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no administrator salaries, preventing Sacramento from taking funds, and keeping all funds local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4359, "fingerprint": "2016|201600591|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600591|FRESNO", "content_hash": "eb97b67c7b7ccb67", "measure_id": "201600591", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging classrooms and facilities, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, upgrade classrooms, science labs, career training facilities, and computer systems, and acquire, renovate, construct and equip facilities to support student achievement in reading, math, science, technology, the arts, and skilled trades, shall the Fowler Unified School District issue a maximum $42,000,000 in bonds, with legal interest rates, an oversight committee, annual audits, no money for salaries, and all money raised benefiting local students?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2329, "no_votes": 650, "total_votes": 2979, "percent_yes": 78.18059751594495, "percent_no": 21.819402484055047, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.286530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.694059", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging classrooms and facilities, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, upgrade classrooms, science labs, career training facilities, and computer systems, and acquire, renovate, construct and equip facilities to support student achievement in reading, math, science, technology, the arts, and skilled trades, shall the Fowler Unified School District issue a maximum $42,000,000 in bonds, with legal interest rates, an oversight committee, annual audits, no money for salaries, and all money raised benefiting local students?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4361, "fingerprint": "2016|201600593|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600593|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a09771153964b977", "measure_id": "201600593", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to upgrade classrooms and science labs to keep pace with educational technology and support student achievement in math, science, engineering and skilled trades; acquire land and construct new classrooms to reduce overcrowding at existing schools; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; and improve student safety and campus security systems, shall Kerman Unified School District issue $27 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money locally-controlled?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3583, "no_votes": 1075, "total_votes": 4658, "percent_yes": 76.92142550450836, "percent_no": 23.078574495491637, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.287061", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.694458", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to upgrade classrooms and science labs to keep pace with educational technology and support student achievement in math, science, engineering and skilled trades; acquire land and construct new classrooms to reduce overcrowding at existing schools; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; and improve student safety and campus security systems, shall Kerman Unified School District issue $27 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money locally-controlled?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4348, "fingerprint": "2016|201600230|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600230|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a6aaa5467d41a8a7", "measure_id": "201600230", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow electronic notices and responses through the Internet for formal bidding?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66203, "no_votes": 57686, "total_votes": 123889, "percent_yes": 53.43735117726352, "percent_no": 46.56264882273648, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.282783", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.691098", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow electronic notices and responses through the Internet for formal bidding?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4344, "fingerprint": "2016|201600226|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600226|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f2ae8941162d1a9d", "measure_id": "201600226", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Kerman approve a 3/4 cent sales tax expended only for construction of senior center, regional fairgrounds, police station, animal kennel, and similar projects, and downtown revitalization up to 10%, estimated annual amount $650,000, for 15 years, subject to audit, review, and Citizen Oversight Committee?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2012, "no_votes": 1167, "total_votes": 3179, "percent_yes": 63.290342875117965, "percent_no": 36.709657124882035, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.281596", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.690340", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Kerman approve a 3/4 cent sales tax expended only for construction of senior center, regional fairgrounds, police station, animal kennel, and similar projects, and downtown revitalization up to 10%, estimated annual amount $650,000, for 15 years, subject to audit, review, and Citizen Oversight Committee?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4362, "fingerprint": "2016|201600595|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600595|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3d5919df7d112828", "measure_id": "201600595", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and construct additional classrooms and support facilities, replace portable classrooms with new permanent facilities, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, improve security and student safety, provide the local match for State grants, and reduce operating costs, shall the Selma Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $30.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4685, "no_votes": 2008, "total_votes": 6693, "percent_yes": 69.99850590168833, "percent_no": 30.001494098311667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.287599", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.694848", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and construct additional classrooms and support facilities, replace portable classrooms with new permanent facilities, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, improve security and student safety, provide the local match for State grants, and reduce operating costs, shall the Selma Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $30.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4347, "fingerprint": "2016|201600229|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600229|FRESNO", "content_hash": "eb29e057650f6cab", "measure_id": "201600229", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To update 9-1-1 dispatch technology at the Selma police operations center to reduce crime, improve video policing, dispatch technology, rapid response, and ensure the operations center will survive natural disasters; shall Selma issue $4,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring average debt service of $230,000 annually, for 30 years, by assessing $16 per $100,000 of assessed value, requiring financial audits, citizen oversight, and funds be spent in Selma?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3640, "no_votes": 1817, "total_votes": 5457, "percent_yes": 66.703316840755, "percent_no": 33.296683159245006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.282482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.690908", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update 9-1-1 dispatch technology at the Selma police operations center to reduce crime, improve video policing, dispatch technology, rapid response, and ensure the operations center will survive natural disasters; shall Selma issue $4,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring average debt service of $230,000 annually, for 30 years, by assessing $16 per $100,000 of assessed value, requiring financial audits, citizen oversight, and funds be spent in Selma?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4345, "fingerprint": "2016|201600227|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600227|FRESNO", "content_hash": "1d3c9e032f80b1ed", "measure_id": "201600227", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support local police services; maintain emergency response times and officer staffing levels; fight crime, drugs and gangs; shall City of Parlier levy a special parcel tax for police protection services only of $120.00 on each single-family home, and specified amounts for multi-family units; mobile home spaces; commercial, agricultural, and industrial parcels, as outlined in Ordinance No. 2016-03, providing an estimated $495,000 annually for five years, with independent annual audits, and benefiting City residents?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1520, "no_votes": 749, "total_votes": 2269, "percent_yes": 66.98986337593654, "percent_no": 33.01013662406346, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.281870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.690529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support local police services; maintain emergency response times and officer staffing levels; fight crime, drugs and gangs; shall City of Parlier levy a special parcel tax for police protection services only of $120.00 on each single-family home, and specified amounts for multi-family units; mobile home spaces; commercial, agricultural, and industrial parcels, as outlined in Ordinance No. 2016-03, providing an estimated $495,000 annually for five years, with independent annual audits, and benefiting City residents?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4357, "fingerprint": "2016|201600589|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600589|FRESNO", "content_hash": "79cb64a86c584259", "measure_id": "201600589", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting on the proposition, the Coalinga-Huron Joint Unified School District (the \"District\") shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $39.0 million in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed in the Bond Project List below, and in order to qualify to receive State matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified below.\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2560, "no_votes": 1381, "total_votes": 3941, "percent_yes": 64.95813245369195, "percent_no": 35.041867546308055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.285924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.693621", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting on the proposition, the Coalinga-Huron Joint Unified School District (the \"District\") shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $39.0 million in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed in the Bond Project List below, and in order to qualify to receive State matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified below.\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4346, "fingerprint": "2016|201600228|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600228|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b6e8073f02202cd9", "measure_id": "201600228", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To reduce gang/drug crimes, maintain 911 emergency response times, provide gang/drug prevention programs; prevent cuts to and retain/maintain police officers, paramedics, firefighters; increase school/neighborhood police patrols; shall the ordinance be adopted continuing the existing voter-approved 3/4 cent sales tax with no tax rate increase, providing $1,900,000 annually, for ten years, requiring citizens' oversight, independent financial audits, all funds for City of Sanger public safety?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4996, "no_votes": 1559, "total_votes": 6555, "percent_yes": 76.21662852784135, "percent_no": 23.78337147215865, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.282141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.690718", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce gang/drug crimes, maintain 911 emergency response times, provide gang/drug prevention programs; prevent cuts to and retain/maintain police officers, paramedics, firefighters; increase school/neighborhood police patrols; shall the ordinance be adopted continuing the existing voter-approved 3/4 cent sales tax with no tax rate increase, providing $1,900,000 annually, for ten years, requiring citizens' oversight, independent financial audits, all funds for City of Sanger public safety?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4339, "fingerprint": "2016|201600024|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600024|FRESNO", "content_hash": "de0d218f545a5e11", "measure_id": "201600024", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Section 21 of the Fresno County Charter be amended to provide that the Chief Probation Officer shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the County Administrative Officer?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 113664, "no_votes": 126895, "total_votes": 240559, "percent_yes": 47.24994699844944, "percent_no": 52.75005300155056, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.280060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.689366", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Section 21 of the Fresno County Charter be amended to provide that the Chief Probation Officer shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the County Administrative Officer?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4340, "fingerprint": "2016|201600025|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600025|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d779542686707105", "measure_id": "201600025", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Fresno County Charter be amended as follows: Amend section 16 to remove the Director of Public Works as county surveyor and authorizing Director of Public Works to appoint a county surveyor; Amend sections 14 and 16 to change the Public Administrator from an elected position to one appointed by the County Administrative Officer; Amend section 12(h) regarding a local preference for Fresno County goods, services and supplies; and Repeal section 32 obsolete language?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 104288, "no_votes": 132101, "total_votes": 236389, "percent_yes": 44.117112048360966, "percent_no": 55.882887951639034, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.280335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.689560", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Fresno County Charter be amended as follows: Amend section 16 to remove the Director of Public Works as county surveyor and authorizing Director of Public Works to appoint a county surveyor; Amend sections 14 and 16 to change the Public Administrator from an elected position to one appointed by the County Administrative Officer; Amend section 12(h) regarding a local preference for Fresno County goods, services and supplies; and Repeal section 32 obsolete language?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4356, "fingerprint": "2016|201600587|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600587|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f28dc73f709fa021", "measure_id": "201600587", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/provide additional classrooms/technology, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing outdated electrical wiring, water, sewer lines, air conditioning, fire alarms; improving cafeteria/disabled access/water conservation; providing space for music programs; removing lead paint/asbestos; constructing/equipping school facilities/sites; shall Caruthers Unified School District K-8 School Facilities Improvement District issue $6,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 883, "no_votes": 378, "total_votes": 1261, "percent_yes": 70.02379064234734, "percent_no": 29.976209357652664, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.285305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.693196", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/provide additional classrooms/technology, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing outdated electrical wiring, water, sewer lines, air conditioning, fire alarms; improving cafeteria/disabled access/water conservation; providing space for music programs; removing lead paint/asbestos; constructing/equipping school facilities/sites; shall Caruthers Unified School District K-8 School Facilities Improvement District issue $6,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4343, "fingerprint": "2016|201600225|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600225|FRESNO", "content_hash": "e3164ebb9238776e", "measure_id": "201600225", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City's Utility Users Tax in order to impose a 5% utility user's tax on wireless telecommunication technologies such as wireless and voice over Internet services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1136, "no_votes": 253, "total_votes": 1389, "percent_yes": 81.78545716342693, "percent_no": 18.214542836573074, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.281322", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.690157", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City's Utility Users Tax in order to impose a 5% utility user's tax on wireless telecommunication technologies such as wireless and voice over Internet services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4360, "fingerprint": "2016|201600592|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600592|FRESNO", "content_hash": "03be05dd5dfb38e8", "measure_id": "201600592", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract/retain quality teachers and repair/upgrade schools by: (1) Improving classrooms, career-technical facilities, science labs, technology; (2) Repairing deteriorating restrooms, plumbling, air conditioning, wiring; (3) Removing asbestos/lead hazards; (4) Upgrading security cameras, lighting, fencing, fire safety; (5) Renovating, building, acquiring facilities/equipment; (6) Securing State funds; shall Fresno Unified School District issue $225 million in bonds, at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62486, "no_votes": 31057, "total_votes": 93543, "percent_yes": 66.7992260243952, "percent_no": 33.200773975604804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.286795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.694261", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract/retain quality teachers and repair/upgrade schools by: (1) Improving classrooms, career-technical facilities, science labs, technology; (2) Repairing deteriorating restrooms, plumbling, air conditioning, wiring; (3) Removing asbestos/lead hazards; (4) Upgrading security cameras, lighting, fencing, fire safety; (5) Renovating, building, acquiring facilities/equipment; (6) Securing State funds; shall Fresno Unified School District issue $225 million in bonds, at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4363, "fingerprint": "2016|201600232|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600232|GLENN", "content_hash": "4b1cfec202a42fc9", "measure_id": "201600232", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support and fund the Orland Volunteer Fire Department; replace and maintain Orland Fire Department first responder and emergency equipment, and maintain and support other general funded City services, shall the City of Orland enact a 1/2  cent (0.5%) sales tax increase by adopting Ordinance No. 2016-05, with all money for Orland and for Orland purposes, no money for Sacramento, and published annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1589, "no_votes": 558, "total_votes": 2147, "percent_yes": 74.01024685607824, "percent_no": 25.98975314392176, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.287955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.695046", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support and fund the Orland Volunteer Fire Department; replace and maintain Orland Fire Department first responder and emergency equipment, and maintain and support other general funded City services, shall the City of Orland enact a 1/2  cent (0.5%) sales tax increase by adopting Ordinance No. 2016-05, with all money for Orland and for Orland purposes, no money for Sacramento, and published annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4366, "fingerprint": "2016|201600597|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600597|GLENN", "content_hash": "18def14ac1255e13", "measure_id": "201600597", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize Willows schools, upgrade safety systems, improve infrastructure an accessibility, replace portables with permanent classrooms, and make other repairs to outdated facilities, shall Willows Unified School District be authorized to issue $8,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, using NO Capital Appreciation Bonds (CABs) and requiring a responsible duration and repayment cost, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee and annual audits to ensure funds are ONLY spent improving LOCAL classrooms and facilities, and NOT for any other purpose?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2061, "no_votes": 1128, "total_votes": 3189, "percent_yes": 64.62841015992474, "percent_no": 35.37158984007526, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.288819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.695642", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize Willows schools, upgrade safety systems, improve infrastructure an accessibility, replace portables with permanent classrooms, and make other repairs to outdated facilities, shall Willows Unified School District be authorized to issue $8,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, using NO Capital Appreciation Bonds (CABs) and requiring a responsible duration and repayment cost, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee and annual audits to ensure funds are ONLY spent improving LOCAL classrooms and facilities, and NOT for any other purpose?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4364, "fingerprint": "2016|201600596|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600596|GLENN", "content_hash": "c9dde65c2121ffdc", "measure_id": "201600596", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms to improve safety and prepare students/ veterans for university transfer/careers, such as nursing, welding, emergency response, by upgrading aging classrooms/ technology, removing asbestos/ unsafe gas lines, improving water conservation, electrical wiring, security, constructing science, welding, public safety, Veterans facilities, and repairing, acquiring, constructing property, facilities/ equipment, shall Butte-Glenn Community College District issue $190,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizen oversight, all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4860, "no_votes": 3897, "total_votes": 8757, "percent_yes": 55.49845837615622, "percent_no": 44.50154162384378, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.288282", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.695238", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms to improve safety and prepare students/ veterans for university transfer/careers, such as nursing, welding, emergency response, by upgrading aging classrooms/ technology, removing asbestos/ unsafe gas lines, improving water conservation, electrical wiring, security, constructing science, welding, public safety, Veterans facilities, and repairing, acquiring, constructing property, facilities/ equipment, shall Butte-Glenn Community College District issue $190,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizen oversight, all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4365, "fingerprint": "2016|201600598|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600598|GLENN", "content_hash": "e37fdf9f29f990b6", "measure_id": "201600598", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 85, "no_votes": 108, "total_votes": 193, "percent_yes": 44.04145077720207, "percent_no": 55.95854922279793, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.288554", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.695440", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4378, "fingerprint": "2016|201600599|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600599|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "14ace83ed6fb5893", "measure_id": "201600599", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; make health and safety improvements, including mold, lead, and asbestos abatement; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 648, "no_votes": 398, "total_votes": 1046, "percent_yes": 61.95028680688337, "percent_no": 38.04971319311663, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.292214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.698407", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; make health and safety improvements, including mold, lead, and asbestos abatement; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4373, "fingerprint": "2016|201600234|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600234|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "c7958586dd114c85", "measure_id": "201600234", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect and maintain essential City services, including increasing and restoring police officers and programs, repairing aging/deteriorating streets and potholes, parks maintenance, and programs for youth and seniors, shall the City of Fortuna establish a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax, sun setting in 8 years providing approximately $1,200,000 annually, requiring independent annual financial audits and a Community Oversight Committee, with all funds remaining in Fortuna?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2707, "no_votes": 1930, "total_votes": 4637, "percent_yes": 58.37826180720293, "percent_no": 41.62173819279707, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.290770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.697105", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect and maintain essential City services, including increasing and restoring police officers and programs, repairing aging/deteriorating streets and potholes, parks maintenance, and programs for youth and seniors, shall the City of Fortuna establish a 3/4\u00a2 sales tax, sun setting in 8 years providing approximately $1,200,000 annually, requiring independent annual financial audits and a Community Oversight Committee, with all funds remaining in Fortuna?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4372, "fingerprint": "2016|201600233|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600233|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "119101826af1528e", "measure_id": "201600233", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arcata continue to impose a three percent (3%) utility users tax (Resolution No. 156-63) on the ordinary use of utility services in the City, including gas, electric, water, wastewater, and communications services, and automatically terminating in eight years, separate from and without impacting the City's excessive electricity users tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3953, "no_votes": 3688, "total_votes": 7641, "percent_yes": 51.734066221698725, "percent_no": 48.265933778301275, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.290498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.696828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arcata continue to impose a three percent (3%) utility users tax (Resolution No. 156-63) on the ordinary use of utility services in the City, including gas, electric, water, wastewater, and communications services, and automatically terminating in eight years, separate from and without impacting the City's excessive electricity users tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4374, "fingerprint": "2016|201600235|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600235|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "924fbac66d123950", "measure_id": "201600235", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a 3/4 cent transaction and use tax be continued in the City of Trinidad for four years, starting on April 1, 2017?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 124, "no_votes": 74, "total_votes": 198, "percent_yes": 62.62626262626263, "percent_no": 37.37373737373737, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.291037", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.697310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a 3/4 cent transaction and use tax be continued in the City of Trinidad for four years, starting on April 1, 2017?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4379, "fingerprint": "2016|201600600|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600600|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "5cef805fae804a70", "measure_id": "201600600", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renew and continue to support academic excellence, provide stable funding the State cannot take away; maintain/expand art, music and dance programs; reduce class sizes; fund school nurse programs to maintain/promote good health; and provide funds for necessary staffing; shall Arcata Elementary School District be authorized to levy $59 per parcel annually for eight years, have no funds for administrators' salaries, provide exemptions including senior citizens' exemption and have all funds stay local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5212, "no_votes": 1328, "total_votes": 6540, "percent_yes": 79.69418960244649, "percent_no": 20.305810397553515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.292481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.698601", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew and continue to support academic excellence, provide stable funding the State cannot take away; maintain/expand art, music and dance programs; reduce class sizes; fund school nurse programs to maintain/promote good health; and provide funds for necessary staffing; shall Arcata Elementary School District be authorized to levy $59 per parcel annually for eight years, have no funds for administrators' salaries, provide exemptions including senior citizens' exemption and have all funds stay local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11259, "fingerprint": "2016|201600605|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600605|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "b3885ca4893d7ece", "measure_id": "201600605", "measure_letter": "H/J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15, "no_votes": 10, "total_votes": 25, "percent_yes": 60.0, "percent_no": 40.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.707304", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.293945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.699723", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4380, "fingerprint": "2016|201600601|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600601|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ff1c1f7e54c2382d", "measure_id": "201600601", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; replace outdated and energy-inefficient heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; improve playgrounds and playfields for school and community use; make health and safety improvements; and modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Arcata Elementary School District issue $3,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and NO money used for teacher or administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4795, "no_votes": 1617, "total_votes": 6412, "percent_yes": 74.78165938864629, "percent_no": 25.21834061135371, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.292760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.698792", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; replace outdated and energy-inefficient heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; improve playgrounds and playfields for school and community use; make health and safety improvements; and modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Arcata Elementary School District issue $3,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and NO money used for teacher or administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4382, "fingerprint": "2016|201600603|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600603|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "cac208d48df6f9b5", "measure_id": "201600603", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize/renovate and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace aging temporary portables with permanent classrooms; and improve student access to modern technology, shall the Jacoby Creek School District issue $2,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 960, "no_votes": 691, "total_votes": 1651, "percent_yes": 58.14657783161719, "percent_no": 41.85342216838281, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.293385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.699245", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize/renovate and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace aging temporary portables with permanent classrooms; and improve student access to modern technology, shall the Jacoby Creek School District issue $2,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4381, "fingerprint": "2016|201600602|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600602|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ba6f2d26474202f0", "measure_id": "201600602", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; replace aging plumbing systems; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety, and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall the Ferndale Unified School District issue $4,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 683, "no_votes": 795, "total_votes": 1478, "percent_yes": 46.21109607577808, "percent_no": 53.78890392422192, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.293114", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.699006", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; replace aging plumbing systems; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety, and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall the Ferndale Unified School District issue $4,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4383, "fingerprint": "2016|201600604|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600604|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "b9a55e1fbe8a358d", "measure_id": "201600604", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize, construct, and/or renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; increase student access to computers and modern technology; and improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Mattole Unifi ed School District issue $2,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 223, "no_votes": 66, "total_votes": 289, "percent_yes": 77.16262975778547, "percent_no": 22.837370242214533, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.293663", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.699454", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize, construct, and/or renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; increase student access to computers and modern technology; and improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Mattole Unifi ed School District issue $2,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4384, "fingerprint": "2016|201600606|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600606|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "b405cda13341fbea", "measure_id": "201600606", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at local elementary schools with funding that cannot be taken by the state; repair or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to modern technology; install solar to reduce utility costs; and modernize or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the South Bay Union School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1613, "no_votes": 1204, "total_votes": 2817, "percent_yes": 57.25949591764288, "percent_no": 42.74050408235712, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.294233", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.699960", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at local elementary schools with funding that cannot be taken by the state; repair or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to modern technology; install solar to reduce utility costs; and modernize or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the South Bay Union School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4376, "fingerprint": "2016|201600237|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600237|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "b5a3caa84998375c", "measure_id": "201600237", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the 250 limit on dwelling units for living accommodations for low income persons and families and for the blind, elderly and disabled to be developed, constructed or acquired by public bodies within the City of Eureka be amended to provide that the number of low-income rental units authorized shall be limited in any year to three percent (3%) of the total number of housing units existing in the City of Eureka during that year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5577, "no_votes": 4063, "total_votes": 9640, "percent_yes": 57.85269709543569, "percent_no": 42.14730290456431, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.291590", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.697862", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the 250 limit on dwelling units for living accommodations for low income persons and families and for the blind, elderly and disabled to be developed, constructed or acquired by public bodies within the City of Eureka be amended to provide that the number of low-income rental units authorized shall be limited in any year to three percent (3%) of the total number of housing units existing in the City of Eureka during that year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4375, "fingerprint": "2016|201600236|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600236|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ce0f355e6c5bd54d", "measure_id": "201600236", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 201 of the Charter of the City of Eureka be amended to allow voters to elect a City Councilmember to represent them from the ward in which the residents are registered to vote?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5625, "no_votes": 4140, "total_votes": 9765, "percent_yes": 57.6036866359447, "percent_no": 42.3963133640553, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.291301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.697506", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 201 of the Charter of the City of Eureka be amended to allow voters to elect a City Councilmember to represent them from the ward in which the residents are registered to vote?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4369, "fingerprint": "2016|201600028|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600028|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "0cba9a3c02863034", "measure_id": "201600028", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors establish by ordinance the Department of Finance and consolidate therewith the offices of the county Auditor-Controller and county Treasurer-Tax Collector?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23907, "no_votes": 27793, "total_votes": 51700, "percent_yes": 46.24177949709864, "percent_no": 53.75822050290136, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.289698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.696237", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors establish by ordinance the Department of Finance and consolidate therewith the offices of the county Auditor-Controller and county Treasurer-Tax Collector?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4370, "fingerprint": "2016|201600029|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600029|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ff4c5ed73cc305e0", "measure_id": "201600029", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors create an elective office for the Department of Finance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24964, "no_votes": 26693, "total_votes": 51657, "percent_yes": 48.32646107981493, "percent_no": 51.67353892018507, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.289965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.696441", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors create an elective office for the Department of Finance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4367, "fingerprint": "2016|201600026|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600026|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "df043ee9f9cc3494", "measure_id": "201600026", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain and improve essential services, including public safety, job creation; crime investigation/prosecution; environmental cleanup/restoration; children/family mental health; drug rehabilitation; other County services, shall Humboldt County establish a $1 - $3 per square foot, based upon type of grow, annual commercial marijuana cultivation tax generating approximately $7.3 million annually until ended by voters, with all revenue for the County, none for the State, annual audits, and public review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37523, "no_votes": 19505, "total_votes": 57028, "percent_yes": 65.7975029809918, "percent_no": 34.202497019008206, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.289149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.695834", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve essential services, including public safety, job creation; crime investigation/prosecution; environmental cleanup/restoration; children/family mental health; drug rehabilitation; other County services, shall Humboldt County establish a $1 - $3 per square foot, based upon type of grow, annual commercial marijuana cultivation tax generating approximately $7.3 million annually until ended by voters, with all revenue for the County, none for the State, annual audits, and public review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4377, "fingerprint": "2016|201600238|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600238|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ed9b74780b4a83d2", "measure_id": "201600238", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Rio Dell, by the necessary and appropriate action, permit commercial cannabis business activity, including cannabis cultivation, testing, processing and sales, within the area of the City that is located to the north of the Eel River and commonly referred to as the Sawmill Annexation Area if that activity is subject to local taxation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 572, "no_votes": 499, "total_votes": 1071, "percent_yes": 53.40802987861812, "percent_no": 46.59197012138188, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.291945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.698196", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Rio Dell, by the necessary and appropriate action, permit commercial cannabis business activity, including cannabis cultivation, testing, processing and sales, within the area of the City that is located to the north of the Eel River and commonly referred to as the Sawmill Annexation Area if that activity is subject to local taxation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4368, "fingerprint": "2016|201600027|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600027|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "2d7160d3cc20336e", "measure_id": "201600027", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To supplement existing funding for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction of existing transportation including trails and transit; local match leveraging of state/federal funds for road, trail, and transit infrastructure; and retention of existing commercial air service, shall the Humboldt County voters adopt an ordinance establishing a 1/2\u00a2 per dollar sales tax throughout Humboldt County for 20 years, raising approximately $10,000,000 annually, requiring independent audits, separate accounts, public oversight and local revenue control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27046, "no_votes": 28344, "total_votes": 55390, "percent_yes": 48.82830835890955, "percent_no": 51.17169164109045, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.289426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.696033", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To supplement existing funding for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction of existing transportation including trails and transit; local match leveraging of state/federal funds for road, trail, and transit infrastructure; and retention of existing commercial air service, shall the Humboldt County voters adopt an ordinance establishing a 1/2\u00a2 per dollar sales tax throughout Humboldt County for 20 years, raising approximately $10,000,000 annually, requiring independent audits, separate accounts, public oversight and local revenue control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4371, "fingerprint": "2016|201600030|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600030|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "1a2c64bd696ab221", "measure_id": "201600030", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to preserve mobile home parks in unincorporated areas of Humboldt County as important sources of affordable housing by: regulating pass-through fees, regulating fee spikes when a home is sold, and regulating monthly lot rents, which would be limited to annual increases pegged to the consumer price index; and shall government administrative costs be offset by a $5 monthly fee charged to mobile home park residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30250, "no_votes": 25136, "total_votes": 55386, "percent_yes": 54.61669013830209, "percent_no": 45.38330986169791, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.290231", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.696633", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to preserve mobile home parks in unincorporated areas of Humboldt County as important sources of affordable housing by: regulating pass-through fees, regulating fee spikes when a home is sold, and regulating monthly lot rents, which would be limited to annual increases pegged to the consumer price index; and shall government administrative costs be offset by a $5 monthly fee charged to mobile home park residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4390, "fingerprint": "2016|201600610|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600610|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "71d99aafa6f9283f", "measure_id": "201600610", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For College of the Desert to modernize career training facilities for nursing, public safety, science, technology, engineering and other in-demand jobs that prepare students for the success in college/careers; repair/construct/acquire classrooms facilities, sites and equipment throughout Coachella Valley; improve the Veteran's Center to provide counseling /training/job placement for returning veterans, shall Desert Community College District issue $577,860,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators and all money locally-controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 687, "no_votes": 260, "total_votes": 947, "percent_yes": 72.54487856388594, "percent_no": 27.455121436114055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.296097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.701278", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For College of the Desert to modernize career training facilities for nursing, public safety, science, technology, engineering and other in-demand jobs that prepare students for the success in college/careers; repair/construct/acquire classrooms facilities, sites and equipment throughout Coachella Valley; improve the Veteran's Center to provide counseling /training/job placement for returning veterans, shall Desert Community College District issue $577,860,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators and all money locally-controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4387, "fingerprint": "2016|201600607|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600607|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "cc84b706a731e338", "measure_id": "201600607", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade neighborhood high schools and retain/attract teachers by updating classrooms, science, technology, engineering/math labs; meeting California earthquake standards; ensuring drinking water safety; upgrading leaky roofs/deteriorating bathrooms/physical education and athletic facilities; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/careers, shall Central Union High School District issue $30,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5661, "no_votes": 2406, "total_votes": 8067, "percent_yes": 70.17478616586091, "percent_no": 29.82521383413909, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.295132", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.700618", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade neighborhood high schools and retain/attract teachers by updating classrooms, science, technology, engineering/math labs; meeting California earthquake standards; ensuring drinking water safety; upgrading leaky roofs/deteriorating bathrooms/physical education and athletic facilities; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college/careers, shall Central Union High School District issue $30,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4391, "fingerprint": "2016|201600611|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600611|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "2909d70f6280086f", "measure_id": "201600611", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and construct new school facilities to reduce student overcrowding; shall El Centro Elementary School District issue $22,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee, and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7797, "no_votes": 2622, "total_votes": 10419, "percent_yes": 74.83443708609272, "percent_no": 25.16556291390728, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.296364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.701479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and construct new school facilities to reduce student overcrowding; shall El Centro Elementary School District issue $22,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee, and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4388, "fingerprint": "2016|201600608|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600608|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "bd3e24063f887ca2", "measure_id": "201600608", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at local elementary schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize/expand classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; increase student access to computers and modern technology; make health and safety improvements; and construct a middle school to reduce student overcrowding; shall the Brawley Elementary School District issue $14,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4771, "no_votes": 1857, "total_votes": 6628, "percent_yes": 71.98249849124925, "percent_no": 28.017501508750755, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.295399", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.700856", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at local elementary schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize/expand classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; increase student access to computers and modern technology; make health and safety improvements; and construct a middle school to reduce student overcrowding; shall the Brawley Elementary School District issue $14,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4392, "fingerprint": "2016|201600612|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600612|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "282a670d7104327e", "measure_id": "201600612", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing/constructing classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; making health and safety improvements; improving access to computers and modern technology; and upgrading/constructing P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; with funds that cannot be taken by the State; shall the Imperial Unified School District issue $40,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4262, "no_votes": 1683, "total_votes": 5945, "percent_yes": 71.69049621530698, "percent_no": 28.30950378469302, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.296630", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.701695", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing/constructing classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; making health and safety improvements; improving access to computers and modern technology; and upgrading/constructing P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; with funds that cannot be taken by the State; shall the Imperial Unified School District issue $40,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4385, "fingerprint": "2016|201600239|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600239|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "0a157d224830b9e5", "measure_id": "201600239", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 16-05A be adopted amending the El Centro Municipal Code in Article III, Sections 25-46-56.3 approving a one-half cent transactions and use tax in addition to the current sales tax rate (raising $5.5M/year until June 30, 2047) to maintain general City services and facilities including police, fire protection, library, parks and recreation, senior programs, and street maintenance and upgrade?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6542, "no_votes": 5379, "total_votes": 11921, "percent_yes": 54.87794648099992, "percent_no": 45.12205351900008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.294594", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.700156", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 16-05A be adopted amending the El Centro Municipal Code in Article III, Sections 25-46-56.3 approving a one-half cent transactions and use tax in addition to the current sales tax rate (raising $5.5M/year until June 30, 2047) to maintain general City services and facilities including police, fire protection, library, parks and recreation, senior programs, and street maintenance and upgrade?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4386, "fingerprint": "2016|201600240|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600240|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "325072ce10d2e9cc", "measure_id": "201600240", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 16-06 be adopted increasing the existing Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax from 10% to 13% on April 1, 2017 (raising an additional $480,000/year); and applying the Tax to all rent charged by hotel operators, including online travel companies, for the transient occupancy of any hotel room, to maintain general city services, including police, fire, library, streets, parks and recreation and other general municipal services until repealed by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5027, "no_votes": 6817, "total_votes": 11844, "percent_yes": 42.4434312732185, "percent_no": 57.5565687267815, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.294863", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.700352", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 16-06 be adopted increasing the existing Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax from 10% to 13% on April 1, 2017 (raising an additional $480,000/year); and applying the Tax to all rent charged by hotel operators, including online travel companies, for the transient occupancy of any hotel room, to maintain general city services, including police, fire, library, streets, parks and recreation and other general municipal services until repealed by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4393, "fingerprint": "2016|201600613|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600613|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "dd287cc94ac4e89a", "measure_id": "201600613", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new gymnasium/multi-purpose room, enhance student safety and security, modernize classrooms and support facilities, including restrooms, upgrade playgrounds and athletic fields, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Meadows Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $6,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 423, "no_votes": 78, "total_votes": 501, "percent_yes": 84.4311377245509, "percent_no": 15.568862275449106, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.296894", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.701886", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new gymnasium/multi-purpose room, enhance student safety and security, modernize classrooms and support facilities, including restrooms, upgrade playgrounds and athletic fields, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Meadows Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $6,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4395, "fingerprint": "2016|201600615|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600615|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "e645d64103b52da9", "measure_id": "201600615", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new gymnasium/multi-purpose room, enhance student safety and security, modernize classrooms and support facilities, upgrade playgrounds and athletic fields, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Seeley Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $6,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 575, "no_votes": 101, "total_votes": 676, "percent_yes": 85.05917159763314, "percent_no": 14.940828402366861, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.297501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.702274", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new gymnasium/multi-purpose room, enhance student safety and security, modernize classrooms and support facilities, upgrade playgrounds and athletic fields, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Seeley Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $6,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4394, "fingerprint": "2016|201600614|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600614|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "e5d01e7849913f94", "measure_id": "201600614", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new gymnasium/multi-purpose room, enhance student safety and security, modernize classrooms and support facilities, upgrade athletic fields, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the San Pasqual Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $8,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 251, "no_votes": 96, "total_votes": 347, "percent_yes": 72.3342939481268, "percent_no": 27.6657060518732, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.297220", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.702084", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new gymnasium/multi-purpose room, enhance student safety and security, modernize classrooms and support facilities, upgrade athletic fields, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the San Pasqual Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $8,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4389, "fingerprint": "2016|201600609|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600609|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "b3f4df71243b9b2e", "measure_id": "201600609", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and construct additional classrooms and support facilities to reduce overcrowding, replace portable classrooms and older schools with new permanent facilities, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, improve student safety, and qualify for State matching grants, shall the Calexico Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $45 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8285, "no_votes": 3018, "total_votes": 11303, "percent_yes": 73.29912412633814, "percent_no": 26.700875873661857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.295770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.701080", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and construct additional classrooms and support facilities to reduce overcrowding, replace portable classrooms and older schools with new permanent facilities, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, improve student safety, and qualify for State matching grants, shall the Calexico Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $45 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4397, "fingerprint": "2016|201600032|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600032|INYO", "content_hash": "d3205ce7ce285995", "measure_id": "201600032", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the County of Inyo adopt regulations which would allow COMMERCIAL cannabis businesses within the County, including but not limited to, cultivation, processing, manufacturing, sales, distribution, warehousing and transportation of MEDICAL cannabis?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4250, "no_votes": 3539, "total_votes": 7789, "percent_yes": 54.56412889973039, "percent_no": 45.43587110026961, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.298038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.702657", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the County of Inyo adopt regulations which would allow COMMERCIAL cannabis businesses within the County, including but not limited to, cultivation, processing, manufacturing, sales, distribution, warehousing and transportation of MEDICAL cannabis?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4398, "fingerprint": "2016|201600033|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600033|INYO", "content_hash": "7892a66ceec3fb29", "measure_id": "201600033", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Proposition 64, the California Marijuana Legalization Initiative Statute, passes, should the County of Inyo adopt regulations which would allow COMMERCIAL cannabis businesses within the County, including but not limited to, cultivation, processing, manufacturing, sales, distribution, warehousing and transportations of RECREATIONAL cannabis?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4129, "no_votes": 3586, "total_votes": 7715, "percent_yes": 53.51911860012962, "percent_no": 46.48088139987038, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.298300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.702844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Proposition 64, the California Marijuana Legalization Initiative Statute, passes, should the County of Inyo adopt regulations which would allow COMMERCIAL cannabis businesses within the County, including but not limited to, cultivation, processing, manufacturing, sales, distribution, warehousing and transportations of RECREATIONAL cannabis?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 4396, "fingerprint": "2016|201600031|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600031|INYO", "content_hash": "23f872a926506462", "measure_id": "201600031", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County ordinance adding Chapter 3.50 to the Inyo County Code imposing a 5% gross receipts tax on COMMERCIAL cannabis businesses (but no less than $1,250 per growing cycle for cultivation BUSINESSES) in the unincorporated area of Inyo County, and authorizing the Board of Supervisors to increase the tax to a maximum of 12.5% over time, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4849, "no_votes": 2679, "total_votes": 7528, "percent_yes": 64.41285866099894, "percent_no": 35.587141339001064, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.297771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.702468", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County ordinance adding Chapter 3.50 to the Inyo County Code imposing a 5% gross receipts tax on COMMERCIAL cannabis businesses (but no less than $1,250 per growing cycle for cultivation BUSINESSES) in the unincorporated area of Inyo County, and authorizing the Board of Supervisors to increase the tax to a maximum of 12.5% over time, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4406, "fingerprint": "2016|201600616|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600616|KERN", "content_hash": "c9e2e87f6089b861", "measure_id": "201600616", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to improve student safety and campus security, replace deteriorated roofs, heating/cooling systems, upgrade classrooms, labs, and computer systems to keep pace with instructional technology, and provide students access to the education, facilities, science, and technology they need to succeed in high school, college and careers, shall the Beardsley School District issue $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1621, "no_votes": 966, "total_votes": 2587, "percent_yes": 62.65945110166216, "percent_no": 37.34054889833784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.300712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.704407", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to improve student safety and campus security, replace deteriorated roofs, heating/cooling systems, upgrade classrooms, labs, and computer systems to keep pace with instructional technology, and provide students access to the education, facilities, science, and technology they need to succeed in high school, college and careers, shall the Beardsley School District issue $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4411, "fingerprint": "2016|201600621|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600621|KERN", "content_hash": "62b6b4db3cfdf49d", "measure_id": "201600621", "measure_letter": "AV", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade math, engineering, aerospace/ advanced manufacturing classrooms/ labs, improve class availability and safety, update technology, repair, construct, acquire facilities, sites/ equipment to maintain quality, affordable education for local students/ returning veterans, and prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities, shall Antelope Valley Community College District issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, audits no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds used locally?\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3832, "no_votes": 2314, "total_votes": 6146, "percent_yes": 62.3494956068988, "percent_no": 37.6505043931012, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.302105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.705432", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade math, engineering, aerospace/ advanced manufacturing classrooms/ labs, improve class availability and safety, update technology, repair, construct, acquire facilities, sites/ equipment to maintain quality, affordable education for local students/ returning veterans, and prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities, shall Antelope Valley Community College District issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, audits no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds used locally?\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4407, "fingerprint": "2016|201600617|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600617|KERN", "content_hash": "1efa95951a791ff6", "measure_id": "201600617", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire property and build a new elementary school to relieve overcrowding; improve school safety/security; and repair, renovate, update, construct, acquire classrooms, labs, sites, facilities, equipment and instructional technology to support student achievement in math, science and technology and better prepare K-8 students for success in high school, college and careers, shall Fairfax Elementary School District issue $19 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no administrator salaries, and all funds benefitting Fairfax schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 955, "no_votes": 411, "total_votes": 1366, "percent_yes": 69.91215226939971, "percent_no": 30.087847730600288, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.300976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.704605", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire property and build a new elementary school to relieve overcrowding; improve school safety/security; and repair, renovate, update, construct, acquire classrooms, labs, sites, facilities, equipment and instructional technology to support student achievement in math, science and technology and better prepare K-8 students for success in high school, college and careers, shall Fairfax Elementary School District issue $19 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no administrator salaries, and all funds benefitting Fairfax schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4408, "fingerprint": "2016|201600618|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600618|KERN", "content_hash": "f249c20ace896f81", "measure_id": "201600618", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to provide high quality education by acquiring, constructing, furnishing, and equipping a new multi-purpose room, repairing, renovating, replacing, redesigning and expanding school district facilities, to include, as needed, additional sites and facilities, shall the General Shafter School District issue $40,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with specific citizen oversight, independent audits, no money for administrators' salaries, all funds benefitting General Shafter School District students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80, "no_votes": 67, "total_votes": 147, "percent_yes": 54.421768707483, "percent_no": 45.578231292517, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.301242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.704808", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to provide high quality education by acquiring, constructing, furnishing, and equipping a new multi-purpose room, repairing, renovating, replacing, redesigning and expanding school district facilities, to include, as needed, additional sites and facilities, shall the General Shafter School District issue $40,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with specific citizen oversight, independent audits, no money for administrators' salaries, all funds benefitting General Shafter School District students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4409, "fingerprint": "2016|201600619|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600619|KERN", "content_hash": "82a2fb90f2733e84", "measure_id": "201600619", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state, make health and security improvements; modernize/provide classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, including classrooms for science, math, reading and writing; construct new school to reduce student overcrowding, including land acquisition; and improve access to computers and technology shall the Wasco Union Elementary School District issue $9,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1346, "no_votes": 616, "total_votes": 1962, "percent_yes": 68.60346585117227, "percent_no": 31.396534148827726, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.301505", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.705039", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state, make health and security improvements; modernize/provide classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, including classrooms for science, math, reading and writing; construct new school to reduce student overcrowding, including land acquisition; and improve access to computers and technology shall the Wasco Union Elementary School District issue $9,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4410, "fingerprint": "2016|201600620|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600620|KERN", "content_hash": "61283f0b317b4db8", "measure_id": "201600620", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; repair/replace leaky roofs; improve student safety at drop-off/pick-up areas; replace outdated portable classrooms; construct a library/media center, and multi-purpose room/gym for school/community use; and construct/modernize student support facilities, and classrooms for alternative education shall Wasco Union Elementary School District issue $9,400,000 of bonds at legal rates, with citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1303, "no_votes": 633, "total_votes": 1936, "percent_yes": 67.30371900826447, "percent_no": 32.696280991735534, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.301827", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.705237", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; repair/replace leaky roofs; improve student safety at drop-off/pick-up areas; replace outdated portable classrooms; construct a library/media center, and multi-purpose room/gym for school/community use; and construct/modernize student support facilities, and classrooms for alternative education shall Wasco Union Elementary School District issue $9,400,000 of bonds at legal rates, with citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4400, "fingerprint": "2016|201600035|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600035|KERN", "content_hash": "1b74310af51f83b4", "measure_id": "201600035", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Kern County Board of Supervisors enact a 0.125 percent (1/8 cent) transactions and use tax on all qualified retail sales within the County of Kern, for the benefit of the Kern County Public Library system, in accordance with California Revenue and Taxation Code \u00a77286.59?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 69375, "no_votes": 64860, "total_votes": 134235, "percent_yes": 51.68175215107833, "percent_no": 48.31824784892167, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.298906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.703226", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Kern County Board of Supervisors enact a 0.125 percent (1/8 cent) transactions and use tax on all qualified retail sales within the County of Kern, for the benefit of the Kern County Public Library system, in accordance with California Revenue and Taxation Code \u00a77286.59?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4399, "fingerprint": "2016|201600034|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600034|KERN", "content_hash": "26317acf5ec7ae68", "measure_id": "201600034", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain police services, may the Bear Valley Community Services District increase the voter-approved annual special tax on each parcel within the District, for the limited purpose of paying salaries and benefits to Bear Valley Police Department personnel, by $167, from $80 to $247 beginning on July 1, 2016, subject to an annual cost of living adjustment not to exceed 3% as provided in Board Resolution 15/16-27?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1049, "no_votes": 1505, "total_votes": 2554, "percent_yes": 41.07282693813626, "percent_no": 58.92717306186374, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.298626", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.703035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain police services, may the Bear Valley Community Services District increase the voter-approved annual special tax on each parcel within the District, for the limited purpose of paying salaries and benefits to Bear Valley Police Department personnel, by $167, from $80 to $247 beginning on July 1, 2016, subject to an annual cost of living adjustment not to exceed 3% as provided in Board Resolution 15/16-27?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4416, "fingerprint": "2016|201600626|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600626|KERN", "content_hash": "7b162f3368b84c65", "measure_id": "201600626", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms to prepare students/veterans for good-paying jobs/ university transfer by updating labs/classrooms for nursing, welding, construction/high-tech job training, repairing deteriorating gas, electrical/sewer lines, leaky roofs, improving water conservation, ensuring access for disabled, including veterans, repairing, constructing/ acquiring facilities, sites/ equipment, shall Kern Community College District issue $502,821,000 in bonds at legal rates, funds spent locally, with citizen oversight/independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 145217, "no_votes": 77603, "total_votes": 222820, "percent_yes": 65.17233641504353, "percent_no": 34.82766358495647, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.303613", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.706410", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms to prepare students/veterans for good-paying jobs/ university transfer by updating labs/classrooms for nursing, welding, construction/high-tech job training, repairing deteriorating gas, electrical/sewer lines, leaky roofs, improving water conservation, ensuring access for disabled, including veterans, repairing, constructing/ acquiring facilities, sites/ equipment, shall Kern Community College District issue $502,821,000 in bonds at legal rates, funds spent locally, with citizen oversight/independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4417, "fingerprint": "2016|201600627|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600627|KERN", "content_hash": "7fd95d9f4068af86", "measure_id": "201600627", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair leaky roofs, aging plumbing, and fire/earthquake safety systems; construct and equip new classrooms and schools; expand and build career training centers for vocational education, agriculture, and biotech; and qualify for State matching funds, shall Kern High School District issue $280 million in bonds with interest rates below legal limits, independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 113865, "no_votes": 57775, "total_votes": 171640, "percent_yes": 66.3394313679795, "percent_no": 33.6605686320205, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.303877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.706602", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair leaky roofs, aging plumbing, and fire/earthquake safety systems; construct and equip new classrooms and schools; expand and build career training centers for vocational education, agriculture, and biotech; and qualify for State matching funds, shall Kern High School District issue $280 million in bonds with interest rates below legal limits, independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4419, "fingerprint": "2016|201600629|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600629|KERN", "content_hash": "60a173cf0bd94fd5", "measure_id": "201600629", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build, renovate or expand new or existing school facilities and provide 21st century learning environments, reduce student overcrowding, increase classroom technology infrastructure, and upgrade vocational education facilities to prepare students for college and high-paying jobs after graduation, shall the McFarland Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $110 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Oversight Committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1024, "no_votes": 1137, "total_votes": 2161, "percent_yes": 47.38546968995835, "percent_no": 52.61453031004165, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.304518", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.706996", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build, renovate or expand new or existing school facilities and provide 21st century learning environments, reduce student overcrowding, increase classroom technology infrastructure, and upgrade vocational education facilities to prepare students for college and high-paying jobs after graduation, shall the McFarland Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $110 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Oversight Committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4420, "fingerprint": "2016|201600630|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600630|KERN", "content_hash": "24eababb9a818a90", "measure_id": "201600630", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade facilities at Boron Schools, improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, replace leaky roofs, modernize/cosntruct/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities, replace heating/air conditioning systems, make health and safety improvements, and improve student access to modern technology, shall the Muroc Joint Unified School District issue $21,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 953, "no_votes": 257, "total_votes": 1210, "percent_yes": 78.7603305785124, "percent_no": 21.239669421487605, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.304783", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.707188", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade facilities at Boron Schools, improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, replace leaky roofs, modernize/cosntruct/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities, replace heating/air conditioning systems, make health and safety improvements, and improve student access to modern technology, shall the Muroc Joint Unified School District issue $21,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4412, "fingerprint": "2016|201600622|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600622|KERN", "content_hash": "1b6a417cf64f50f3", "measure_id": "201600622", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade Bakersfield K-8 schools and retain/attract quality teachers by repairing deteriorated classrooms, bathrooms, plumbing, roofs, electrical/wiring; removing asbestos/lead paint; improving school safety/disabled access; updating instructional technology; and acquiring sites and adding new classrooms/school facilities to relieve overcrowding; shall Bakersfield City School District issue $110 million in bonds, within legal limits, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, and all funds dedicated to Bakersfield neighborhood K-8 schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31411, "no_votes": 119991, "total_votes": 151402, "percent_yes": 20.746753675644968, "percent_no": 79.25324632435503, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.302430", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.705643", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade Bakersfield K-8 schools and retain/attract quality teachers by repairing deteriorated classrooms, bathrooms, plumbing, roofs, electrical/wiring; removing asbestos/lead paint; improving school safety/disabled access; updating instructional technology; and acquiring sites and adding new classrooms/school facilities to relieve overcrowding; shall Bakersfield City School District issue $110 million in bonds, within legal limits, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, and all funds dedicated to Bakersfield neighborhood K-8 schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4413, "fingerprint": "2016|201600623|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600623|KERN", "content_hash": "24bb789f278e388f", "measure_id": "201600623", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to repair aging, outdated classrooms and school buildings; upgrade classrooms, labs, and computer systems to keep pace with instructional technology; improve student safety and campus security, and provide students access to the education, technology and facilities they need to succeed in high school, college and careers, shall the Fruitvale School District issue $23 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money locally-controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5081, "no_votes": 2739, "total_votes": 7820, "percent_yes": 64.97442455242967, "percent_no": 35.02557544757033, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.302744", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.705835", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to repair aging, outdated classrooms and school buildings; upgrade classrooms, labs, and computer systems to keep pace with instructional technology; improve student safety and campus security, and provide students access to the education, technology and facilities they need to succeed in high school, college and careers, shall the Fruitvale School District issue $23 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money locally-controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4414, "fingerprint": "2016|201600624|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600624|KERN", "content_hash": "e3bdd0203c313f71", "measure_id": "201600624", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to provide high quality education by acquiring, constructing, furnishing, and equipping a new multi-purpose room, and by repairing, renovating, replacing, and redesigning school district facilities, shall the General Shatter School District issue $7,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with no money for administrators' salaries, all funds benefitting General Shafter School District students, specific citizen oversight, and annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 166, "no_votes": 105, "total_votes": 271, "percent_yes": 61.254612546125465, "percent_no": 38.745387453874535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.303083", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.706026", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to provide high quality education by acquiring, constructing, furnishing, and equipping a new multi-purpose room, and by repairing, renovating, replacing, and redesigning school district facilities, shall the General Shatter School District issue $7,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with no money for administrators' salaries, all funds benefitting General Shafter School District students, specific citizen oversight, and annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4415, "fingerprint": "2016|201600625|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600625|KERN", "content_hash": "70619f798b30431d", "measure_id": "201600625", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a new local elementary school to reduce overcrowding at existing Greenfield schools; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical and ventilation systems; improve school safety/security; and upgrade classrooms, labs, facilities, and instructional technology to support student achievement in reading, math, science and technology; shall Greenfield Union School District issue $19,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries/pensions, and all funds dedicated locally to Greenfield Union K-8 schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7923, "no_votes": 2041, "total_votes": 9964, "percent_yes": 79.51625853071056, "percent_no": 20.48374146928944, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.303349", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.706216", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a new local elementary school to reduce overcrowding at existing Greenfield schools; repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical and ventilation systems; improve school safety/security; and upgrade classrooms, labs, facilities, and instructional technology to support student achievement in reading, math, science and technology; shall Greenfield Union School District issue $19,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries/pensions, and all funds dedicated locally to Greenfield Union K-8 schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4418, "fingerprint": "2016|201600628|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600628|KERN", "content_hash": "a518edc11fb11d03", "measure_id": "201600628", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Lost Hills schools, replace old portable classrooms, upgrade the science room, expand library, fix cracks in the foundation of some buildings, make other repairs to roofing, plumbing, painting, restrooms, the parking lot and ADA accessibility, and improve student support facilities, shall Lost Hills Union School District issue $7,000,000 in local bonds, at legal rates, to renovate, construct and acquire schools, sites, equipment and facilities, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 104, "no_votes": 63, "total_votes": 167, "percent_yes": 62.27544910179641, "percent_no": 37.72455089820359, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.304182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.706796", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Lost Hills schools, replace old portable classrooms, upgrade the science room, expand library, fix cracks in the foundation of some buildings, make other repairs to roofing, plumbing, painting, restrooms, the parking lot and ADA accessibility, and improve student support facilities, shall Lost Hills Union School District issue $7,000,000 in local bonds, at legal rates, to renovate, construct and acquire schools, sites, equipment and facilities, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4421, "fingerprint": "2016|201600631|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600631|KERN", "content_hash": "d3cf531b7b194795", "measure_id": "201600631", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize local elementary classrooms and school facilities, including repairing deteriorated roofs, plumbing, electrical and ventilation systems; improve school safety; add new classrooms; and acquire, renovate, construct, equip classrooms, sites/facilities to reduce overcrowding and support student achievement in reading, math, science and technology, shall Standard School District issue $33,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds dedicated locally to Standard School District neighborhood K-8 schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4417, "no_votes": 2150, "total_votes": 6567, "percent_yes": 67.2605451499924, "percent_no": 32.739454850007604, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.305047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.707382", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize local elementary classrooms and school facilities, including repairing deteriorated roofs, plumbing, electrical and ventilation systems; improve school safety; add new classrooms; and acquire, renovate, construct, equip classrooms, sites/facilities to reduce overcrowding and support student achievement in reading, math, science and technology, shall Standard School District issue $33,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds dedicated locally to Standard School District neighborhood K-8 schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4401, "fingerprint": "2016|201600241|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600241|KERN", "content_hash": "601a142176cff634", "measure_id": "201600241", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance increasing the rate of the City of California City's Transient Occupancy (Hotel Guest) Tax, from 6% to 10%, raising an estimated $40,000 annually in additional general fund revenues until the tax is reduced or repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1463, "no_votes": 2276, "total_votes": 3739, "percent_yes": 39.12810912008558, "percent_no": 60.87189087991442, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.299182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.703434", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance increasing the rate of the City of California City's Transient Occupancy (Hotel Guest) Tax, from 6% to 10%, raising an estimated $40,000 annually in additional general fund revenues until the tax is reduced or repealed by the voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4402, "fingerprint": "2016|201600242|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600242|KERN", "content_hash": "2ff2d6582015e139", "measure_id": "201600242", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain the City of Delano's current level of essential general services, including, but not limited to, police and fire services, street improvements, parks and recreation, and other General Fund services, shall the City of Delano continue collecting its existing voter-approved one percent (1%) Sales Tax for an additional ten (10) years, with all proceeds to be used for essential City general services, with no increase in tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3685, "no_votes": 3624, "total_votes": 7309, "percent_yes": 50.41729374743467, "percent_no": 49.58270625256533, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.299446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.703625", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the City of Delano's current level of essential general services, including, but not limited to, police and fire services, street improvements, parks and recreation, and other General Fund services, shall the City of Delano continue collecting its existing voter-approved one percent (1%) Sales Tax for an additional ten (10) years, with all proceeds to be used for essential City general services, with no increase in tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4403, "fingerprint": "2016|201600243|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600243|KERN", "content_hash": "953b42e166519076", "measure_id": "201600243", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help prevent cuts and maintain City of Ridgecrest services, including: city streets and pothole repair; police officers and neighborhood police patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response times; crime prevention and investigation; and other city services, shall the City of Ridgecrest enact a one cent sales tax, providing $4,000,000 annually for 8 years, requiring a citizen's oversight committee, annual independent audits, with all funds for City of Ridgecrest services only, and no funds for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6858, "no_votes": 3828, "total_votes": 10686, "percent_yes": 64.17742841100505, "percent_no": 35.82257158899495, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:30", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.299712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.703820", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help prevent cuts and maintain City of Ridgecrest services, including: city streets and pothole repair; police officers and neighborhood police patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response times; crime prevention and investigation; and other city services, shall the City of Ridgecrest enact a one cent sales tax, providing $4,000,000 annually for 8 years, requiring a citizen's oversight committee, annual independent audits, with all funds for City of Ridgecrest services only, and no funds for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4405, "fingerprint": "2016|201600245|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600245|KERN", "content_hash": "97521ef58ce6619b", "measure_id": "201600245", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 760, "no_votes": 1260, "total_votes": 2020, "percent_yes": 37.62376237623762, "percent_no": 62.37623762376238, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.300442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.704213", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4404, "fingerprint": "2016|201600244|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600244|KERN", "content_hash": "c9911a491adb58af", "measure_id": "201600244", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for basic services such as: Sheriffs deputy response to violent crimes, burglaries/ gangs; 9-1-1 emergency medical/ fire response; Gang prevention programs; Pothole, lighting/ street repairs; Park safety/ maintenance, senior/ disabled transit services; and Water conservation; shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a one-cent sales tax until ended by voters, providing $1,100,000 annually, requiring independent audits, public review of spending, and all revenues controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2338, "no_votes": 1249, "total_votes": 3587, "percent_yes": 65.17981600223027, "percent_no": 34.82018399776973, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.299979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.704016", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for basic services such as: Sheriffs deputy response to violent crimes, burglaries/ gangs; 9-1-1 emergency medical/ fire response; Gang prevention programs; Pothole, lighting/ street repairs; Park safety/ maintenance, senior/ disabled transit services; and Water conservation; shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a one-cent sales tax until ended by voters, providing $1,100,000 annually, requiring independent audits, public review of spending, and all revenues controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4423, "fingerprint": "2016|201600632|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600632|KINGS", "content_hash": "7b35aaf706ee7231", "measure_id": "201600632", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education without increasing the current tax rate; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and security improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Kingsburg Elementary Charter School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95, "no_votes": 105, "total_votes": 200, "percent_yes": 47.5, "percent_no": 52.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.305968", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.708074", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education without increasing the current tax rate; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and security improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Kingsburg Elementary Charter School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4424, "fingerprint": "2016|201600634|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600634|KINGS", "content_hash": "a1827377d2b4c121", "measure_id": "201600634", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Fresno City, Clovis, Reedley Colleges, to prepare students and veterans for jobs/university transfer by upgrading classroom buildings, labs/technology, upgrading vocational/career education programs, removing leading paint/asbestos, repairing leaky roofs, wiring, gas/sewer lines and acquiring, construct/repairing facilities, sites/equipment. Shall State Center Community College District issue $485,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 88, "no_votes": 168, "total_votes": 256, "percent_yes": 34.375, "percent_no": 65.625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.306238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.708260", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Fresno City, Clovis, Reedley Colleges, to prepare students and veterans for jobs/university transfer by upgrading classroom buildings, labs/technology, upgrading vocational/career education programs, removing leading paint/asbestos, repairing leaky roofs, wiring, gas/sewer lines and acquiring, construct/repairing facilities, sites/equipment. Shall State Center Community College District issue $485,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11260, "fingerprint": "2016|201600037|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600037|KINGS", "content_hash": "b45e8d980da3ad6e", "measure_id": "201600037", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Public Safety \u00bc cent Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance be adopted? The County and its four cities anticipate the measure will permanently generate approximately $4 million annually to be used exclusively for the police and fire departments of these five municipalities. The tax would not be levied if the \u00bc cent Proposition 30 sales tax is extended by the state beyond January 1, 2017.\u00a0", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21177, "no_votes": 11419, "total_votes": 32596, "percent_yes": 64.9680942446926, "percent_no": 35.031905755307406, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.715048", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.305685", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.707876", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Public Safety \u00bc cent Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance be adopted? The County and its four cities anticipate the measure will permanently generate approximately $4 million annually to be used exclusively for the police and fire departments of these five municipalities. The tax would not be levied if the \u00bc cent Proposition 30 sales tax is extended by the state beyond January 1, 2017.\u00a0", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4422, "fingerprint": "2016|201600036|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600036|KINGS", "content_hash": "a05368f5579ab06e", "measure_id": "201600036", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Public Safety 1/4 cent Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance be adopted? The County and its four cities anticipate the measure will permanently generate approximately $4 million annually to be used exclusively for the police and fire departments of these five municipalities. The tax would not be levied if the 1/4 cent Proposition 30 sales tax is extended by the state beyond January 1, 2017.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12583, "no_votes": 6398, "total_votes": 18981, "percent_yes": 66.29260839787156, "percent_no": 33.70739160212844, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.305363", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.707673", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Public Safety 1/4 cent Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance be adopted? The County and its four cities anticipate the measure will permanently generate approximately $4 million annually to be used exclusively for the police and fire departments of these five municipalities. The tax would not be levied if the 1/4 cent Proposition 30 sales tax is extended by the state beyond January 1, 2017.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4429, "fingerprint": "2016|201600638|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600638|KINGS", "content_hash": "d24299b127e6cce7", "measure_id": "201600638", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade high school facilities and prepare students for college/careers by repairing outdated classrooms, vocational/ career education facilities, restrooms, plumbing, leaky roofs, asbestos/lead paint, upgrading school safety, heating/air conditioning, updating classroom technology, wiring, science labs, ensuring safe drinking water, repairing, constructing/ acquiring classrooms, facilities/sites/equipment, shall Lemoore Union High School District issue $24,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrator salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5749, "no_votes": 3023, "total_votes": 8772, "percent_yes": 65.53807569539444, "percent_no": 34.46192430460556, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.307732", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.709227", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade high school facilities and prepare students for college/careers by repairing outdated classrooms, vocational/ career education facilities, restrooms, plumbing, leaky roofs, asbestos/lead paint, upgrading school safety, heating/air conditioning, updating classroom technology, wiring, science labs, ensuring safe drinking water, repairing, constructing/ acquiring classrooms, facilities/sites/equipment, shall Lemoore Union High School District issue $24,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrator salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4425, "fingerprint": "2016|201600633|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600633|KINGS", "content_hash": "0a6afd5f059597af", "measure_id": "201600633", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; construct new classrooms to reduce student overcrowding; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; and upgrade technology infrastructure. Shall the Pioneer Union Elementary School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1325, "no_votes": 1277, "total_votes": 2602, "percent_yes": 50.92236740968485, "percent_no": 49.07763259031515, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.306518", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.708457", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; construct new classrooms to reduce student overcrowding; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; and upgrade technology infrastructure. Shall the Pioneer Union Elementary School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4431, "fingerprint": "2016|201600640|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600640|KINGS", "content_hash": "91407febfd513783", "measure_id": "201600640", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize, upgrade, and renovate old classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve fire alarms and security systems; and upgrade inadequate electrical systems, shall the Reef-Sunset Unified School District issue $12,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 903, "no_votes": 205, "total_votes": 1108, "percent_yes": 81.49819494584838, "percent_no": 18.501805054151617, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.308278", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.709612", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize, upgrade, and renovate old classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve fire alarms and security systems; and upgrade inadequate electrical systems, shall the Reef-Sunset Unified School District issue $12,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4427, "fingerprint": "2016|201600636|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600636|KINGS", "content_hash": "2df9f5475b7daf73", "measure_id": "201600636", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade aging elementary/middle school facilities by repairing outdated classrooms, upgrading inadequate electrical systems, restrooms, improving access for disabled students, provide access to computers/ modern technology, replacing aging portable classrooms and repairing, constructing, acquiring classrooms, facilities, sites and equipment, shall Hanford Elementary School District issue $24,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, all funds staying local, without increasing current tax rates.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7850, "no_votes": 3502, "total_votes": 11352, "percent_yes": 69.1508104298802, "percent_no": 30.849189570119805, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.307125", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.708844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade aging elementary/middle school facilities by repairing outdated classrooms, upgrading inadequate electrical systems, restrooms, improving access for disabled students, provide access to computers/ modern technology, replacing aging portable classrooms and repairing, constructing, acquiring classrooms, facilities, sites and equipment, shall Hanford Elementary School District issue $24,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, all funds staying local, without increasing current tax rates.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4426, "fingerprint": "2016|201600635|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600635|KINGS", "content_hash": "f6c8104c1ea3d173", "measure_id": "201600635", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; construct additional classrooms and school facilities to reduce student overcrowding; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall the Armona Union Elementary School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1105, "no_votes": 440, "total_votes": 1545, "percent_yes": 71.52103559870551, "percent_no": 28.47896440129449, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.306847", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.708650", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; construct additional classrooms and school facilities to reduce student overcrowding; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall the Armona Union Elementary School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4428, "fingerprint": "2016|201600637|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600637|KINGS", "content_hash": "397ac4fdec6f90e5", "measure_id": "201600637", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/ upgrade high school facilities and prepare students for college/careers by repairing outdated classrooms, vocational/ career education facilities, science labs, restrooms, leaky roofs, upgrading school safety, fire alarms, heating/ ventilation/ air conditioning, ensuring safe drinking water/ student drop-off areas and repairing, constructing/ acquiring classrooms, facilities/sites/equipment, shall Hanford Joint Union High School District issue $33,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12633, "no_votes": 7131, "total_votes": 19764, "percent_yes": 63.919247115968425, "percent_no": 36.080752884031575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.307454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.709035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/ upgrade high school facilities and prepare students for college/careers by repairing outdated classrooms, vocational/ career education facilities, science labs, restrooms, leaky roofs, upgrading school safety, fire alarms, heating/ ventilation/ air conditioning, ensuring safe drinking water/ student drop-off areas and repairing, constructing/ acquiring classrooms, facilities/sites/equipment, shall Hanford Joint Union High School District issue $33,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4430, "fingerprint": "2016|201600639|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600639|KINGS", "content_hash": "675b1affb47d0c64", "measure_id": "201600639", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at local schools; fix leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace portables with permanent classrooms; access State Matching funds; construct new classrooms; and upgrade technology infrastructure; shall the Pioneer Union Elementary School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2469, "no_votes": 1927, "total_votes": 4396, "percent_yes": 56.164695177434034, "percent_no": 43.835304822565966, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.308006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.709419", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at local schools; fix leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace portables with permanent classrooms; access State Matching funds; construct new classrooms; and upgrade technology infrastructure; shall the Pioneer Union Elementary School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4440, "fingerprint": "2016|201600643|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600643|LAKE", "content_hash": "fc6d3a1eba341b8d", "measure_id": "201600643", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace outdated portables with modern permanent classrooms at Lucerne Elementary, modernize existing classrooms, enhance student safety and security, reconfigure student drop-off areas, upgrade playgrounds and fields, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Lucerne Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $4,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 807, "no_votes": 327, "total_votes": 1134, "percent_yes": 71.16402116402116, "percent_no": 28.835978835978835, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.310875", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.711364", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace outdated portables with modern permanent classrooms at Lucerne Elementary, modernize existing classrooms, enhance student safety and security, reconfigure student drop-off areas, upgrade playgrounds and fields, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Lucerne Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $4,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4432, "fingerprint": "2016|201600038|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600038|LAKE", "content_hash": "1f47954743c712cd", "measure_id": "201600038", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual general purpose tax be imposed on legally-authorized cannabis cultivation, with an exemption for personal medicinal use, occurring in unincorporated areas of the County of Lake of $1.00 per square foot of an outdoor cultivation site, $2.00 per square foot of a mixed-light cultivation site, and $3.00 per square foot of an indoor cultivation site, subject to annual Consumer Price Index increases, and generating annual revenue of approximately $8 million per average year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14812, "no_votes": 8813, "total_votes": 23625, "percent_yes": 62.696296296296296, "percent_no": 37.303703703703704, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.308613", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.709813", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual general purpose tax be imposed on legally-authorized cannabis cultivation, with an exemption for personal medicinal use, occurring in unincorporated areas of the County of Lake of $1.00 per square foot of an outdoor cultivation site, $2.00 per square foot of a mixed-light cultivation site, and $3.00 per square foot of an indoor cultivation site, subject to annual Consumer Price Index increases, and generating annual revenue of approximately $8 million per average year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4437, "fingerprint": "2016|201600644|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600644|LAKE", "content_hash": "23684b5015363a27", "measure_id": "201600644", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/ facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6153, "no_votes": 4076, "total_votes": 10229, "percent_yes": 60.1525075764982, "percent_no": 39.8474924235018, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.309993", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.710804", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/ facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4438, "fingerprint": "2016|201600641|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600641|LAKE", "content_hash": "28424fa97f36ebc9", "measure_id": "201600641", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace inefficient heating and air-conditioning systems; update inadequate electrical systems; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Kelseyville Unified School District issue $24,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2165, "no_votes": 1346, "total_votes": 3511, "percent_yes": 61.663343776701794, "percent_no": 38.336656223298206, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.310329", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.710985", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace inefficient heating and air-conditioning systems; update inadequate electrical systems; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Kelseyville Unified School District issue $24,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4433, "fingerprint": "2016|201600246|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600246|LAKE", "content_hash": "cdef552d9babfa56", "measure_id": "201600246", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Clearlake impose a retail transactions and use tax of one percent (1%) to be used for road maintenance and improvement; shall the appropriations limit for the City of Clearlake for road maintenance and improvement increase Fiscal Year 2016-2017 by tax proceeds received, shall a Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee annually review the use of proceeds, and shall it expire in twenty years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26845, "no_votes": 1219, "total_votes": 28064, "percent_yes": 95.65635689851769, "percent_no": 4.343643101482314, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.308884", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.709997", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Clearlake impose a retail transactions and use tax of one percent (1%) to be used for road maintenance and improvement; shall the appropriations limit for the City of Clearlake for road maintenance and improvement increase Fiscal Year 2016-2017 by tax proceeds received, shall a Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee annually review the use of proceeds, and shall it expire in twenty years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4435, "fingerprint": "2016|201600248|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600248|LAKE", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201600248", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1864, "no_votes": 1817, "total_votes": 3681, "percent_yes": 50.6384134745993, "percent_no": 49.3615865254007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.309433", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.710436", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4436, "fingerprint": "2016|201600249|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600249|LAKE", "content_hash": "0f6356d7580fba1b", "measure_id": "201600249", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1829, "no_votes": 1865, "total_votes": 3694, "percent_yes": 49.51272333513806, "percent_no": 50.48727666486194, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.309721", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.710625", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4439, "fingerprint": "2016|201600642|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600642|LAKE", "content_hash": "b70f19def848226a", "measure_id": "201600642", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; construct new science labs; provide updated career technical classrooms for job training; renovate deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and upgrade, modernize, construct and renovate classrooms, restrooms, and schools facilities, shall Konocti Unified School District issue $29,600,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money used for administrator salaries and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4750, "no_votes": 2119, "total_votes": 6869, "percent_yes": 69.1512592808269, "percent_no": 30.848740719173094, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.310607", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.711174", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; construct new science labs; provide updated career technical classrooms for job training; renovate deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and upgrade, modernize, construct and renovate classrooms, restrooms, and schools facilities, shall Konocti Unified School District issue $29,600,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money used for administrator salaries and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4434, "fingerprint": "2016|201600247|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600247|LAKE", "content_hash": "4eccb3c4ad16a30a", "measure_id": "201600247", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain/enhance general City services including: recruiting, hiring, retaining qualified police officers/improve neighborhood patrols, maintain response to property, burglary, violent crimes; repairing local streets/potholes; enhancing business attraction/youth recreational programs; keeping Lakeport\u2019s parks/pool safe/clean; shall the ordinance to enact a one-cent sales tax until ended by voters, providing about $1,500,000 annually, requiring independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, all revenues controlled locally be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1247, "no_votes": 766, "total_votes": 2013, "percent_yes": 61.94734227521113, "percent_no": 38.05265772478887, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.309159", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.710200", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/enhance general City services including: recruiting, hiring, retaining qualified police officers/improve neighborhood patrols, maintain response to property, burglary, violent crimes; repairing local streets/potholes; enhancing business attraction/youth recreational programs; keeping Lakeport\u2019s parks/pool safe/clean; shall the ordinance to enact a one-cent sales tax until ended by voters, providing about $1,500,000 annually, requiring independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, all revenues controlled locally be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4442, "fingerprint": "2016|201600040|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600040|LASSEN", "content_hash": "c4502e8bc8aad405", "measure_id": "201600040", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on December 14th, 2015 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Lassen ordering the formation of a District in the territory described, known as the Southern Cascades Community Services District, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 226, "no_votes": 87, "total_votes": 313, "percent_yes": 72.20447284345049, "percent_no": 27.79552715654951, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.311462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.711734", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on December 14th, 2015 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Lassen ordering the formation of a District in the territory described, known as the Southern Cascades Community Services District, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4441, "fingerprint": "2016|201600039|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600039|LASSEN", "content_hash": "76597060cbd0b117", "measure_id": "201600039", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted to assess a special tax of $65 per annum per parcel regardless of the size for up to two parcels owned by each unique landowner regardless of which county the parcels are located, the special tax will be authorized only if the Southern Cascades Community Services District is formed and is collected in the same manner as taxes on real property , commencing in the fiscal year after which the voters have authorized the special tax, with the revenue to be used for local ambulance, emergency medical response and training, and any lawful purpose of the Southern Cascades Community Services District? (NOTE: Passage of a special tax shall be required for the district to be formed.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 220, "no_votes": 93, "total_votes": 313, "percent_yes": 70.28753993610223, "percent_no": 29.712460063897765, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.311140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.711551", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted to assess a special tax of $65 per annum per parcel regardless of the size for up to two parcels owned by each unique landowner regardless of which county the parcels are located, the special tax will be authorized only if the Southern Cascades Community Services District is formed and is collected in the same manner as taxes on real property , commencing in the fiscal year after which the voters have authorized the special tax, with the revenue to be used for local ambulance, emergency medical response and training, and any lawful purpose of the Southern Cascades Community Services District? (NOTE: Passage of a special tax shall be required for the district to be formed.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4443, "fingerprint": "2016|201600041|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600041|LASSEN", "content_hash": "9a76354026fe3064", "measure_id": "201600041", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should Lassen County separate from the State of California and become part of a new State of Jefferson?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3094, "no_votes": 3964, "total_votes": 7058, "percent_yes": 43.83678095777841, "percent_no": 56.16321904222159, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.311731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.712001", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should Lassen County separate from the State of California and become part of a new State of Jefferson?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4444, "fingerprint": "2016|201600645|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600645|LASSEN", "content_hash": "9bbc47a38d981eb9", "measure_id": "201600645", "measure_letter": "H/J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 132, "no_votes": 137, "total_votes": 269, "percent_yes": 49.07063197026022, "percent_no": 50.92936802973978, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.312016", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.712188", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4447, "fingerprint": "2016|201600250|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600250|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fcb73623c12873aa", "measure_id": "201600250", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Jim Dear be recalled (removed) from the office of City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5351, "no_votes": 4707, "total_votes": 10058, "percent_yes": 53.20143169616226, "percent_no": 46.79856830383774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-02-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.312885", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.712772", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jim Dear be recalled (removed) from the office of City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11265, "fingerprint": "2016|201600263|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600263|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7dccb540728532c8", "measure_id": "201600263", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect the public's health, safety, and general welfare by providing additional law enforcement protection and services such as shelter, counseling, and support services for the homeless community, shall the ordinance imposing an annual special parcel tax of (i) $36 per unit upon developed residential parcels, (ii) $144 per acre or portion thereof (not to exceed $1,000 per parcel) on other developed parcels, which will be subject to a 50% discount for parcels owned by senior citizens, which will raise $3,958,234.00 annually for a term of 20 years, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3857, "no_votes": 7307, "total_votes": 11164, "percent_yes": 34.54854890720172, "percent_no": 65.45145109279828, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-10-11", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.722711", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.316425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.715159", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the public's health, safety, and general welfare by providing additional law enforcement protection and services such as shelter, counseling, and support services for the homeless community, shall the ordinance imposing an annual special parcel tax of (i) $36 per unit upon developed residential parcels, (ii) $144 per acre or portion thereof (not to exceed $1,000 per parcel) on other developed parcels, which will be subject to a 50% discount for parcels owned by senior citizens, which will raise $3,958,234.00 annually for a term of 20 years, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11263, "fingerprint": "2016|201600258|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600258|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6e08bcff93a86753", "measure_id": "201600258", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain 911 emergency response services; increase police, firefighter/paramedic staffing; repair potholes/streets; improve water supplies; and maintain general services; shall the City of Long Beach establish a one cent (1%) transactions and use (sales) tax for six years, generating approximately $48 million annually, declining to one-half cent for four years and then ending, requiring a citizens' advisory committee and independent audits, with all funds remaining in Long Beach?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54928, "no_votes": 36132, "total_votes": 91060, "percent_yes": 60.32066769163189, "percent_no": 39.67933230836811, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.721740", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.315087", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.714236", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain 911 emergency response services; increase police, firefighter/paramedic staffing; repair potholes/streets; improve water supplies; and maintain general services; shall the City of Long Beach establish a one cent (1%) transactions and use (sales) tax for six years, generating approximately $48 million annually, declining to one-half cent for four years and then ending, requiring a citizens' advisory committee and independent audits, with all funds remaining in Long Beach?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11262, "fingerprint": "2016|201600254|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600254|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "01bcc4f7e52f0a37", "measure_id": "201600254", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance establishing term limits for Walnut City Council Members be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1778, "no_votes": 228, "total_votes": 2006, "percent_yes": 88.63409770687937, "percent_no": 11.365902293120627, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.720985", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.313957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.713506", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance establishing term limits for Walnut City Council Members be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11261, "fingerprint": "2016|201600251|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600251|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2c3f2e9f04b2624b", "measure_id": "201600251", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City of Arcadia adopt a measure repealing the City's Utility Users Tax in its entirety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3109, "no_votes": 5617, "total_votes": 8726, "percent_yes": 35.629154251661696, "percent_no": 64.3708457483383, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.720416", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.313150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.712954", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City of Arcadia adopt a measure repealing the City's Utility Users Tax in its entirety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4445, "fingerprint": "2016|201600042|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600042|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ec9bbbb0fc8fb12b", "measure_id": "201600042", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To replace expiring local funding for safe, clean neighborhood/ city/ county parks; increase safe playgrounds, reduce gang activity; keep neighborhood recreation/ senior centers, drinking water safe; protect beaches, rivers, water resources, remaining natural areas/ open space; shall 1.5 cents be levied annually per square foot of improved property in Los Angeles County, with bond authority, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, and funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2363405, "no_votes": 791939, "total_votes": 3155344, "percent_yes": 74.90165889994879, "percent_no": 25.098341100051215, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.312286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.712380", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace expiring local funding for safe, clean neighborhood/ city/ county parks; increase safe playgrounds, reduce gang activity; keep neighborhood recreation/ senior centers, drinking water safe; protect beaches, rivers, water resources, remaining natural areas/ open space; shall 1.5 cents be levied annually per square foot of improved property in Los Angeles County, with bond authority, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, and funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4469, "fingerprint": "2016|201600277|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600277|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "10bff35632da490d", "measure_id": "201600277", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Temple City Charter be amended to do the following, none of which grant the City new powers: prohibit Councilmembers and Commissioners from accepting City contractor or lobbyist gifts without full reimbursement; establish stricter Councilmember contribution and gift restrictions; impose overall limit of four terms for Councilmembers; prohibit City contractors, lobbyists, and employees from serving on City commissions; prohibit Council candidates from accepting City contractor or lobbyist contributions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8781, "no_votes": 1388, "total_votes": 10169, "percent_yes": 86.35067361589144, "percent_no": 13.649326384108562, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.320273", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.717705", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Temple City Charter be amended to do the following, none of which grant the City new powers: prohibit Councilmembers and Commissioners from accepting City contractor or lobbyist gifts without full reimbursement; establish stricter Councilmember contribution and gift restrictions; impose overall limit of four terms for Councilmembers; prohibit City contractors, lobbyists, and employees from serving on City commissions; prohibit Council candidates from accepting City contractor or lobbyist contributions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4484, "fingerprint": "2016|201600651|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600651|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "34d242ac0ee12f6a", "measure_id": "201600651", "measure_letter": "AE", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade local elementary schools and attract/retain quality teachers, repair deteriorating classrooms, leaky roofs, remove asbestos/lead paint, ensure safe drinking water and disabled accessibility, upgrade school fire and earthquake safety systems, update restrooms, classroom technology/wiring/science labs, repair, acquire, construct classrooms/sites/facilities/equipment, shall Alhambra Unified School District issue $110,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, require audits, citizen oversight, all funds for local elementary schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22670, "no_votes": 6745, "total_votes": 29415, "percent_yes": 77.06952235254121, "percent_no": 22.930477647458787, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.326336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.721171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade local elementary schools and attract/retain quality teachers, repair deteriorating classrooms, leaky roofs, remove asbestos/lead paint, ensure safe drinking water and disabled accessibility, upgrade school fire and earthquake safety systems, update restrooms, classroom technology/wiring/science labs, repair, acquire, construct classrooms/sites/facilities/equipment, shall Alhambra Unified School District issue $110,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, require audits, citizen oversight, all funds for local elementary schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4480, "fingerprint": "2016|201600653|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600653|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c27243e9e8178fe6", "measure_id": "201600653", "measure_letter": "AV", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "\u00a0To upgrade math, engineering, aerospace/advanced manufacturing classrooms/labs, improve class availability and safety, update technology, repair, construct, acquire facilities, sites/equipment to maintain quality, affordable education for local students/returning veterans, and prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities, shall Antelope Valley Community College District issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens' oversight, audits no money for administrators' salaries and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83189, "no_votes": 34683, "total_votes": 117872, "percent_yes": 70.57570924392562, "percent_no": 29.424290756074384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.324525", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.720072", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "\u00a0To upgrade math, engineering, aerospace/advanced manufacturing classrooms/labs, improve class availability and safety, update technology, repair, construct, acquire facilities, sites/equipment to maintain quality, affordable education for local students/returning veterans, and prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities, shall Antelope Valley Community College District issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens' oversight, audits no money for administrators' salaries and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11267, "fingerprint": "2016|201600282|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600282|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9ec9a70390daf890", "measure_id": "201600282", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 16-3,882 be approved allowing no more than a 14-gate, 355,000 square foot replacement terminal and ancillary improvements to be built at the Bob Hope Airport meeting current safety, seismic standards and improving disabled access; demolishing the existing terminal; and modifying Adjacent Property easement and authorizing future agreements necessary to implement the project; in exchange for governance changes that provide Burbank a greater voice in the future of the airport?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29587, "no_votes": 12876, "total_votes": 42463, "percent_yes": 69.67713067847302, "percent_no": 30.32286932152698, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.726466", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.321774", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.718610", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 16-3,882 be approved allowing no more than a 14-gate, 355,000 square foot replacement terminal and ancillary improvements to be built at the Bob Hope Airport meeting current safety, seismic standards and improving disabled access; demolishing the existing terminal; and modifying Adjacent Property easement and authorizing future agreements necessary to implement the project; in exchange for governance changes that provide Burbank a greater voice in the future of the airport?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11264, "fingerprint": "2016|201600261|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600261|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "859987661eafe685", "measure_id": "201600261", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help maintain city services, such as police, firefighter, paramedic, park, library, street repair and community programs, during economic recessions that cause temporary budget shortfalls, shall the City of Long Beach establish a budget stabilization (\"rainy day\") fund as part of the General Fund to provide short-term funding for such general services into which one percent of any new general tax revenues shall be deposited and spent only to balance the budget?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52300, "no_votes": 37829, "total_votes": 90129, "percent_yes": 58.027937733692816, "percent_no": 41.972062266307184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.722310", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.315895", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.714792", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help maintain city services, such as police, firefighter, paramedic, park, library, street repair and community programs, during economic recessions that cause temporary budget shortfalls, shall the City of Long Beach establish a budget stabilization (\"rainy day\") fund as part of the General Fund to provide short-term funding for such general services into which one percent of any new general tax revenues shall be deposited and spent only to balance the budget?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4448, "fingerprint": "2016|201600252|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600252|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "af0ab2a9a987cc26", "measure_id": "201600252", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the hotel tax measure which increases transient occupancy taxes on lodging from 8% to 12% (indefinitely increasing annual general fund revenues by an estimated $3,200,000.00) for all City services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2534, "no_votes": 996, "total_votes": 3530, "percent_yes": 71.78470254957507, "percent_no": 28.215297450424927, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.313421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.713134", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the hotel tax measure which increases transient occupancy taxes on lodging from 8% to 12% (indefinitely increasing annual general fund revenues by an estimated $3,200,000.00) for all City services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4492, "fingerprint": "2016|201600661|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600661|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fe7bd5238d96cc6a", "measure_id": "201600661", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/repair all neighborhood school classrooms and retain/attract quality teachers by renovating all science, technology, engineering, art/math labs/classrooms, and athletic facilities; ensuring drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college and 21st century vocational jobs/careers, shall Hacienda La Puente Unified School District issue up to $148,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26140, "no_votes": 7824, "total_votes": 33964, "percent_yes": 76.96384407019197, "percent_no": 23.036155929808032, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.329059", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.722809", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/repair all neighborhood school classrooms and retain/attract quality teachers by renovating all science, technology, engineering, art/math labs/classrooms, and athletic facilities; ensuring drinking water safety; repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring educational facilities to prepare students for college and 21st century vocational jobs/careers, shall Hacienda La Puente Unified School District issue up to $148,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11273, "fingerprint": "2016|201600667|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600667|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0acc10f8c276d6a9", "measure_id": "201600667", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, update and renovate aging classrooms, construct and equip needed school facilities, repair or replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, aging portable classrooms, install air conditioning, make improvements for student safety, renovate buildings for earthquake safety, and provide modern classrooms and equipment needed to support instruction in reading, math, arts, science and technology, shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District issue 114 million dollars in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13510, "no_votes": 5401, "total_votes": 18911, "percent_yes": 71.43990270213104, "percent_no": 28.560097297868964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.732058", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.330901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.724031", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, update and renovate aging classrooms, construct and equip needed school facilities, repair or replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems, aging portable classrooms, install air conditioning, make improvements for student safety, renovate buildings for earthquake safety, and provide modern classrooms and equipment needed to support instruction in reading, math, arts, science and technology, shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District issue 114 million dollars in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4450, "fingerprint": "2016|201600255|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600255|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a8c5bfe765f23ea4", "measure_id": "201600255", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 16-1580, which extends the existing 2% Utility Users Tax on electricity & gas by seven years to June 30, 2023, to raise approximately $8.5 million annually, to continue basic and essential services for residents, including but not limited to, law enforcement, gang intervention programs, graffiti removal, youth and senior programs, sidewalk and street repair, City special events, and public parks staffing, while exempting senior and low-income households, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13076, "no_votes": 5748, "total_votes": 18824, "percent_yes": 69.46451338716531, "percent_no": 30.53548661283469, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.314233", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.713687", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 16-1580, which extends the existing 2% Utility Users Tax on electricity & gas by seven years to June 30, 2023, to raise approximately $8.5 million annually, to continue basic and essential services for residents, including but not limited to, law enforcement, gang intervention programs, graffiti removal, youth and senior programs, sidewalk and street repair, City special events, and public parks staffing, while exempting senior and low-income households, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4463, "fingerprint": "2016|201600271|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600271|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "91f892740400b312", "measure_id": "201600271", "measure_letter": "CA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 607 and Section 700 of the Charter of the City of Culver City be amended to change the appointing authority and the reporting responsibilities of the Fire Chief and Police Chief from the City Council to the City Manager?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5958, "no_votes": 10898, "total_votes": 16856, "percent_yes": 35.346464167062166, "percent_no": 64.65353583293783, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.318639", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.716615", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 607 and Section 700 of the Charter of the City of Culver City be amended to change the appointing authority and the reporting responsibilities of the Fire Chief and Police Chief from the City Council to the City Manager?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4464, "fingerprint": "2016|201600272|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600272|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e9dcf2a615b00157", "measure_id": "201600272", "measure_letter": "CB", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 602 of the Charter of the City of Culver City be amended to provide for the ineligibility of a person who has resigned from the City Council to run for the Office of City Council Member for a period of two years from the date of such resignation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11749, "no_votes": 4986, "total_votes": 16735, "percent_yes": 70.2061547654616, "percent_no": 29.793845234538395, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.318953", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.716799", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 602 of the Charter of the City of Culver City be amended to provide for the ineligibility of a person who has resigned from the City Council to run for the Office of City Council Member for a period of two years from the date of such resignation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4495, "fingerprint": "2016|201600665|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600665|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "15331fe8aa9d281d", "measure_id": "201600665", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair local community colleges/prepare students/veterans for jobs/university transfer by upgrading vocational/career education for veterans, firefighters, paramedics nurses/police, removing lead paint/asbestos, upgrading campus safety/security systems, technology, handicapped accessibility/earthquake safety, repairing deteriorating gas, water/sewer lines, acquiring, constructing, repairing facilities, sites/equipment, shall Los Angeles Community College District issue $3,300,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizen oversight, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1196841, "no_votes": 379513, "total_votes": 1576354, "percent_yes": 75.92463367999828, "percent_no": 24.07536632000172, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.330205", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.723603", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair local community colleges/prepare students/veterans for jobs/university transfer by upgrading vocational/career education for veterans, firefighters, paramedics nurses/police, removing lead paint/asbestos, upgrading campus safety/security systems, technology, handicapped accessibility/earthquake safety, repairing deteriorating gas, water/sewer lines, acquiring, constructing, repairing facilities, sites/equipment, shall Los Angeles Community College District issue $3,300,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizen oversight, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4465, "fingerprint": "2016|201600273|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600273|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c1345b97a539e7b4", "measure_id": "201600273", "measure_letter": "CD", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 608 of the Charter of the City of Culver City be amended to authorize the City Council to determine the dates of Regular Meetings of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12201, "no_votes": 4560, "total_votes": 16761, "percent_yes": 72.79398603901916, "percent_no": 27.20601396098084, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.319218", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.716980", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 608 of the Charter of the City of Culver City be amended to authorize the City Council to determine the dates of Regular Meetings of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4458, "fingerprint": "2016|201600266|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600266|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ca9c69f44fba499a", "measure_id": "201600266", "measure_letter": "CW", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect public health/groundwater supplies and prevent toxins and pollutants from contaminating local waterways, creeks and beaches, by improving storm drains/infrastructure to capture/clean urban runoff; preserving open space; and complying with clean water laws, shall Culver City establish a $99 clean water parcel tax; generating approximately $2,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, public oversight, low-income senior citizens discounts and local control of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14026, "no_votes": 4893, "total_votes": 18919, "percent_yes": 74.13711084095354, "percent_no": 25.86288915904646, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.317246", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.715707", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect public health/groundwater supplies and prevent toxins and pollutants from contaminating local waterways, creeks and beaches, by improving storm drains/infrastructure to capture/clean urban runoff; preserving open space; and complying with clean water laws, shall Culver City establish a $99 clean water parcel tax; generating approximately $2,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, public oversight, low-income senior citizens discounts and local control of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4472, "fingerprint": "2016|201600280|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600280|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3fb53c57b91b95b3", "measure_id": "201600280", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Members of the City Council of the City of Bellflower be elected by-districts described in Ordinance No.1302 instead of at-large?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10151, "no_votes": 9448, "total_votes": 19599, "percent_yes": 51.79345884994133, "percent_no": 48.20654115005867, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.321141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.718250", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Members of the City Council of the City of Bellflower be elected by-districts described in Ordinance No.1302 instead of at-large?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11271, "fingerprint": "2016|201600664|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600664|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "678fb89455aa2b48", "measure_id": "201600664", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve outdated classrooms/neighborhood schools by: improving technology/labs/career education classrooms/electrical systems/wiring; upgrading handicapped accessibility/earthquake safety; upgrading bathrooms, fire alarms/sprinklers/security cameras; removing lead paint/asbestos; installing air conditioning; improving student health/physical education; repairing/constructing/acquiring facilities/equipment, shall Long Beach Unified School District issue $1,500,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions; and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 129757, "no_votes": 43584, "total_votes": 173341, "percent_yes": 74.85649673187532, "percent_no": 25.143503268124675, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.731480", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.329917", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.723352", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve outdated classrooms/neighborhood schools by: improving technology/labs/career education classrooms/electrical systems/wiring; upgrading handicapped accessibility/earthquake safety; upgrading bathrooms, fire alarms/sprinklers/security cameras; removing lead paint/asbestos; installing air conditioning; improving student health/physical education; repairing/constructing/acquiring facilities/equipment, shall Long Beach Unified School District issue $1,500,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions; and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4482, "fingerprint": "2016|201600649|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600649|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b481256031503ab7", "measure_id": "201600649", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade College of the Canyons' classrooms, labs/technology to prepare students for four-year college/jobs in science, aerospace, teaching, nursing/manufacturing, accommodate growing student enrollment, expand veterans' services/public safety training, upgrade accessibility, enhance parking, improve earthquake safety/qualify for State matching funds, and construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall Santa Clarita Community College District issue $230,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, mandatory audits, no funds for administrators' salaries and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33605, "no_votes": 23875, "total_votes": 57480, "percent_yes": 58.46381350034795, "percent_no": 41.53618649965205, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.325696", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.720803", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade College of the Canyons' classrooms, labs/technology to prepare students for four-year college/jobs in science, aerospace, teaching, nursing/manufacturing, accommodate growing student enrollment, expand veterans' services/public safety training, upgrade accessibility, enhance parking, improve earthquake safety/qualify for State matching funds, and construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall Santa Clarita Community College District issue $230,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, mandatory audits, no funds for administrators' salaries and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4496, "fingerprint": "2016|201600668|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600668|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3d5b88d2924d9a4a", "measure_id": "201600668", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace the 65 year old Mira Costa High School gymnasium utilized by the community and district by constructing and equipping a new gymnasium, physical education and activities center, including adding instructional space and bathrooms, air conditioning, heating, electrical and plumbing systems, shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District issue 39 million dollars in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12661, "no_votes": 6129, "total_votes": 18790, "percent_yes": 67.38158594997338, "percent_no": 32.618414050026615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.331187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.724211", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace the 65 year old Mira Costa High School gymnasium utilized by the community and district by constructing and equipping a new gymnasium, physical education and activities center, including adding instructional space and bathrooms, air conditioning, heating, electrical and plumbing systems, shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District issue 39 million dollars in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4489, "fingerprint": "2016|201600658|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600658|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1ee2e129709d2839", "measure_id": "201600658", "measure_letter": "ER", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize/rebuild El Rancho High School for the 21st Century, prepare students for jobs of the future, improve/expand science/career training labs, repair/improve neighborhood schools, including aging classrooms, roofs, restrooms, heating/air conditioning/electrical systems, strengthen school safety/security, and repair/acquire/construct school sites and facilities, shall El Rancho Unified School District issue $200,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrator salaries, all funds for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13790, "no_votes": 6170, "total_votes": 19960, "percent_yes": 69.0881763527054, "percent_no": 30.911823647294597, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.328148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.722267", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize/rebuild El Rancho High School for the 21st Century, prepare students for jobs of the future, improve/expand science/career training labs, repair/improve neighborhood schools, including aging classrooms, roofs, restrooms, heating/air conditioning/electrical systems, strengthen school safety/security, and repair/acquire/construct school sites and facilities, shall El Rancho Unified School District issue $200,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrator salaries, all funds for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4504, "fingerprint": "2016|201600677|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600677|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "72cecef17069f8a8", "measure_id": "201600677", "measure_letter": "ES", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade and modernize outdated classrooms, science labs/career-training facilities to support 21st Century instruction and student achievement in math, science, engineering, arts and skilled trades, repair/replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems/portables, improve student/campus safety, repair, acquire/construct classrooms, sites, facilities, equipment/technology, shall West Covina Unified School District issue $143,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14299, "no_votes": 4774, "total_votes": 19073, "percent_yes": 74.96985267131548, "percent_no": 25.03014732868452, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.333880", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.725866", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and modernize outdated classrooms, science labs/career-training facilities to support 21st Century instruction and student achievement in math, science, engineering, arts and skilled trades, repair/replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical systems/portables, improve student/campus safety, repair, acquire/construct classrooms, sites, facilities, equipment/technology, shall West Covina Unified School District issue $143,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4473, "fingerprint": "2016|201600283|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600283|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6ac4d91a22b93e49", "measure_id": "201600283", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance No. 2016-333 approving changing the existing Zoning from Planned Development - Residential Multifamily (20) - Open Space Development Restricted - Scenic Corridor to Commercial Retail - Residential Multifamily (20) - Open Space Development Restricted - Scenic Corridor - Development Plan to accommodate: 67 Single-Family Detached Homes and two Affordable Duplexes; a 72,872 square-foot, three-story hotel; and preservation of approximately 61.0 acres as Permanent Open Space on a 77-acre property at 4790 Las Virgenes Road, Calabasas be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3795, "no_votes": 6990, "total_votes": 10785, "percent_yes": 35.18776077885953, "percent_no": 64.81223922114047, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.322241", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.718793", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance No. 2016-333 approving changing the existing Zoning from Planned Development - Residential Multifamily (20) - Open Space Development Restricted - Scenic Corridor to Commercial Retail - Residential Multifamily (20) - Open Space Development Restricted - Scenic Corridor - Development Plan to accommodate: 67 Single-Family Detached Homes and two Affordable Duplexes; a 72,872 square-foot, three-story hotel; and preservation of approximately 61.0 acres as Permanent Open Space on a 77-acre property at 4790 Las Virgenes Road, Calabasas be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4486, "fingerprint": "2016|201600655|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600655|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6a98ff808b044a3a", "measure_id": "201600655", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, upgrade and make more energy efficient aging classrooms and facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the State, repair deteriorating roofs, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems, and repair, construct, acquire, and upgrade classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, refurbish pools, locker rooms, and gymnasium, shall Claremont Unified School District issue $58,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent financial audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrator and teacher salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12236, "no_votes": 5928, "total_votes": 18164, "percent_yes": 67.36401673640168, "percent_no": 32.63598326359832, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.327225", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.721725", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, upgrade and make more energy efficient aging classrooms and facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the State, repair deteriorating roofs, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems, and repair, construct, acquire, and upgrade classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, refurbish pools, locker rooms, and gymnasium, shall Claremont Unified School District issue $58,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent financial audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrator and teacher salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4490, "fingerprint": "2016|201600659|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600659|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d1217118979374b1", "measure_id": "201600659", "measure_letter": "GA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade schools, repair leaky roofs, renovate aging classrooms, bathrooms/playgrounds, improve student access to computers/modern technology, replace outdated plumbing, heating/air-conditioning, update electrical/lighting systems, improve security systems, ensure safe drinking water, build multimedia learning labs, repair, construct/acquire educational facilities, sites/equipment, shall Garvey School District issue $40,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent financial audits, citizen's oversight, and all funding spent on local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7130, "no_votes": 1787, "total_votes": 8917, "percent_yes": 79.95962767747, "percent_no": 20.040372322530004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.328432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.722448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade schools, repair leaky roofs, renovate aging classrooms, bathrooms/playgrounds, improve student access to computers/modern technology, replace outdated plumbing, heating/air-conditioning, update electrical/lighting systems, improve security systems, ensure safe drinking water, build multimedia learning labs, repair, construct/acquire educational facilities, sites/equipment, shall Garvey School District issue $40,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent financial audits, citizen's oversight, and all funding spent on local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4491, "fingerprint": "2016|201600660|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600660|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e5ee9adfc8dac29e", "measure_id": "201600660", "measure_letter": "GC", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms/labs to prepare students/veteran for jobs/university transfer, upgrade vocational education equipment/technology for engineering/nursing/law enforcement/firefighting careers, repair deteriorating gas/sewer lines, improve handicapped accessibility/earthquake safety, and acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities/equipment, shall Glendale Community College District issue $325,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators' salaries, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49527, "no_votes": 17639, "total_votes": 67166, "percent_yes": 73.73820087544293, "percent_no": 26.261799124557072, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.328720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.722629", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms/labs to prepare students/veteran for jobs/university transfer, upgrade vocational education equipment/technology for engineering/nursing/law enforcement/firefighting careers, repair deteriorating gas/sewer lines, improve handicapped accessibility/earthquake safety, and acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities/equipment, shall Glendale Community College District issue $325,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizen oversight, audits, no funds for administrators' salaries, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11269, "fingerprint": "2016|201600648|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600648|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b32fff623eb3ad33", "measure_id": "201600648", "measure_letter": "GS", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade neighborhood schools and improve education for each student by: upgrading computer/science labs, libraries, career/vocational education programs; fixing leaky roofs, bathrooms, drinking fountains, plumbing, wiring, improving earthquake safety standards/fires safety/school security; and repairing/constructing/acquiring facilities, sites/equipment; shall Montebello Unified School District issue $300 million in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, and funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18658, "no_votes": 5266, "total_votes": 23924, "percent_yes": 77.9886306637686, "percent_no": 22.011369336231397, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.728662", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.325404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.720622", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade neighborhood schools and improve education for each student by: upgrading computer/science labs, libraries, career/vocational education programs; fixing leaky roofs, bathrooms, drinking fountains, plumbing, wiring, improving earthquake safety standards/fires safety/school security; and repairing/constructing/acquiring facilities, sites/equipment; shall Montebello Unified School District issue $300 million in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, and funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4470, "fingerprint": "2016|201600278|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600278|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3db1fa94a90ccf6a", "measure_id": "201600278", "measure_letter": "GS", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If a local transactions and use tax is enacted in Santa Monica, should half its revenue be used to improve and maintain local public schools, including attracting and retaining high-quality teachers, expanding access to pre-schools, assisting at-risk students, and improving school technology, arts, music, math, and science instruction; and half to help preserve and ensure housing in Santa Monica that is affordable, protect residents from displacement by rising housing costs, and reduce homelessness?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29163, "no_votes": 12391, "total_votes": 41554, "percent_yes": 70.18096934109833, "percent_no": 29.819030658901667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.320601", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.717886", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If a local transactions and use tax is enacted in Santa Monica, should half its revenue be used to improve and maintain local public schools, including attracting and retaining high-quality teachers, expanding access to pre-schools, assisting at-risk students, and improving school technology, arts, music, math, and science instruction; and half to help preserve and ensure housing in Santa Monica that is affordable, protect residents from displacement by rising housing costs, and reduce homelessness?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4461, "fingerprint": "2016|201600269|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600269|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "03bdee85a3dbdfb6", "measure_id": "201600269", "measure_letter": "GSH", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve Santa Monica community services including support for preservation of affordable housing, reducing homelessness, school repair and improvement, education of Santa Monica children and students, and other general fund services, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase by one-half percent Santa Monica's transactions and use tax, subject to independent annual audits, all funds used locally, no money going to Sacramento, raising approximately $16 million annually, until ended by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26190, "no_votes": 15812, "total_votes": 42002, "percent_yes": 62.35417361078044, "percent_no": 37.64582638921956, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.318101", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.716250", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve Santa Monica community services including support for preservation of affordable housing, reducing homelessness, school repair and improvement, education of Santa Monica children and students, and other general fund services, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase by one-half percent Santa Monica's transactions and use tax, subject to independent annual audits, all funds used locally, no money going to Sacramento, raising approximately $16 million annually, until ended by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4479, "fingerprint": "2016|201600289|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600289|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ee629690e938c67c", "measure_id": "201600289", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of West Covina abandon Sunset Field as a public park, to allow the land to be sold to Queen of the Valley Hospital to expand the hospital's emergency room and provide additional critical medical services, with millions of dollars in sale revenues to be placed into the City's New Park Acquisition Fund and used only to acquire and improve new parkland in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22756, "no_votes": 10433, "total_votes": 33189, "percent_yes": 68.5648859561903, "percent_no": 31.435114043809705, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.324227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.719891", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of West Covina abandon Sunset Field as a public park, to allow the land to be sold to Queen of the Valley Hospital to expand the hospital's emergency room and provide additional critical medical services, with millions of dollars in sale revenues to be placed into the City's New Park Acquisition Fund and used only to acquire and improve new parkland in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4471, "fingerprint": "2016|201600279|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600279|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1ea1d12b33d02585", "measure_id": "201600279", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted allowing a 26 story (345 feet) residential building instead of two residential buildings of 8 and 18 stories (101 and 218 feet); increasing open space from 3.28 to 3.89 acres and identifying 1.7 acres of open space as private garden generally open to the public subject to property owner's reasonable restrictions; removing conference center and relocating its uses; prohibiting discretionary architectural review; reducing graywater use requirements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6372, "no_votes": 7835, "total_votes": 14207, "percent_yes": 44.85112972478355, "percent_no": 55.14887027521645, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.320869", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.718069", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted allowing a 26 story (345 feet) residential building instead of two residential buildings of 8 and 18 stories (101 and 218 feet); increasing open space from 3.28 to 3.89 acres and identifying 1.7 acres of open space as private garden generally open to the public subject to property owner's reasonable restrictions; removing conference center and relocating its uses; prohibiting discretionary architectural review; reducing graywater use requirements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4462, "fingerprint": "2016|201600270|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600270|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "95da108dcebfd971", "measure_id": "201600270", "measure_letter": "HHH", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide safe, clean affordable housing for the homeless and for those in danger of becoming homeless, such as battered women and their children, veterans, seniors, foster youth, and the disabled; and provide facilities to increase access to mental health care, drug and alcohol treatment, and other services; shall the City of Los Angeles issue $1,200,000,000 in general obligation bonds, with citizen oversight and annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 916518, "no_votes": 271582, "total_votes": 1188100, "percent_yes": 77.14148640686811, "percent_no": 22.85851359313189, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.318375", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.716431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe, clean affordable housing for the homeless and for those in danger of becoming homeless, such as battered women and their children, veterans, seniors, foster youth, and the disabled; and provide facilities to increase access to mental health care, drug and alcohol treatment, and other services; shall the City of Los Angeles issue $1,200,000,000 in general obligation bonds, with citizen oversight and annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4485, "fingerprint": "2016|201600652|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600652|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4d6c3c2d34bfa842", "measure_id": "201600652", "measure_letter": "HS", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade local high schools, attract/retain quality teachers/prepare students for careers/college, repair deteriorating classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, leaky roofs, remove asbestos/lead paint, ensure safe drinking water and disabled accessibility, upgrade school fire and earthquake safety systems, upgrade technology, repair, acquire, construct classrooms/sites/facilities/equipment, shall Alhambra Unified School District issue $149,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, require audits, citizen oversight, all funds for local high schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29203, "no_votes": 8831, "total_votes": 38034, "percent_yes": 76.78130094126307, "percent_no": 23.21869905873693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.326629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.721354", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade local high schools, attract/retain quality teachers/prepare students for careers/college, repair deteriorating classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, leaky roofs, remove asbestos/lead paint, ensure safe drinking water and disabled accessibility, upgrade school fire and earthquake safety systems, upgrade technology, repair, acquire, construct classrooms/sites/facilities/equipment, shall Alhambra Unified School District issue $149,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, require audits, citizen oversight, all funds for local high schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4499, "fingerprint": "2016|201600671|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600671|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "84d0f5fd73bc0b19", "measure_id": "201600671", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade schools that prepar students for college/careers; upgrade classrooms/labs for job training/college preparation; improve school security/technology, electrical wiring, air conditioning, emergency alarms, earthquake safety, disabled access, aging gymnasiums/athletic fields and tracks; repair deteriorating roofs, water pipes; remove lead paint/asbestos; shall Paramount Unified School District issue 106 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15684, "no_votes": 2936, "total_votes": 18620, "percent_yes": 84.23200859291084, "percent_no": 15.767991407089156, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.332064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.724774", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade schools that prepar students for college/careers; upgrade classrooms/labs for job training/college preparation; improve school security/technology, electrical wiring, air conditioning, emergency alarms, earthquake safety, disabled access, aging gymnasiums/athletic fields and tracks; repair deteriorating roofs, water pipes; remove lead paint/asbestos; shall Paramount Unified School District issue 106 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4476, "fingerprint": "2016|201600286|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600286|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8690cd464bee7346", "measure_id": "201600286", "measure_letter": "JJJ", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance: 1) requiring that certain residential development projects provide for affordable housing and comply with prevailing wage, local hiring and other labor standards; 2) requiring the City to assess the impacts of community plan changes on affordable housing and local jobs; 3) creating an affordable housing incentive program for developments near major transit stops; and 4) making other changes; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 736770, "no_votes": 400154, "total_votes": 1136924, "percent_yes": 64.80380394819707, "percent_no": 35.19619605180293, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.323294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.719343", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance: 1) requiring that certain residential development projects provide for affordable housing and comply with prevailing wage, local hiring and other labor standards; 2) requiring the City to assess the impacts of community plan changes on affordable housing and local jobs; 3) creating an affordable housing incentive program for developments near major transit stops; and 4) making other changes; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4454, "fingerprint": "2016|201600260|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600260|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5b3a640243c4d739", "measure_id": "201600260", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City approve amendments to the City Charter, General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, and Coastal Zoning Ordinance to conditionally allow residential care facilities for the elderly in the P-CF zoning district on properties over one acre in the Coastal Zone pursuant to a request from the School District to rezone surplus school property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11501, "no_votes": 6283, "total_votes": 17784, "percent_yes": 64.67049032838507, "percent_no": 35.32950967161493, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.315630", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.714610", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City approve amendments to the City Charter, General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, and Coastal Zoning Ordinance to conditionally allow residential care facilities for the elderly in the P-CF zoning district on properties over one acre in the Coastal Zone pursuant to a request from the School District to rezone surplus school property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4457, "fingerprint": "2016|201600265|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600265|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "beacc21f32eff9c1", "measure_id": "201600265", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If a future Carson City Council or if voters of Carson through another ballot measure permit cannabis business activities, shall an ordinance establishing a cannabis tax of $25 per square foot of space utilized for cultivation and 18% of gross proceeds (adjusted annually on July 1 based on CPI) apply on all cannabis related business activities in Carson with annual revenues ranging from $500,000 to $3.5 million for Carson, with no sunset clause, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19835, "no_votes": 10972, "total_votes": 30807, "percent_yes": 64.38471775895088, "percent_no": 35.615282241049115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.316979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.715526", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If a future Carson City Council or if voters of Carson through another ballot measure permit cannabis business activities, shall an ordinance establishing a cannabis tax of $25 per square foot of space utilized for cultivation and 18% of gross proceeds (adjusted annually on July 1 based on CPI) apply on all cannabis related business activities in Carson with annual revenues ranging from $500,000 to $3.5 million for Carson, with no sunset clause, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4493, "fingerprint": "2016|201600662|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600662|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0ed75fc7c8345a7b", "measure_id": "201600662", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local public education by modernizing outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the state; make health and safety improvements; repair or replace leaky roofs; update electrical systems for modern technology; and replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; shall the Lawndale Elementary School District issue $27,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9287, "no_votes": 3342, "total_votes": 12629, "percent_yes": 73.53709715733629, "percent_no": 26.46290284266371, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.329345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.722989", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local public education by modernizing outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the state; make health and safety improvements; repair or replace leaky roofs; update electrical systems for modern technology; and replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; shall the Lawndale Elementary School District issue $27,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4481, "fingerprint": "2016|201600647|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600647|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "29efdfffacca6c53", "measure_id": "201600647", "measure_letter": "LB", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students/veterans for jobs/universities by: building/upgrading classrooms/laboratories, for health services, small businesses, police, firefighting, technology/other careers; improving deteriorating gas/electrical/sewer lines/leaky roofs, earthquake safety, security and repairing/constructing/acquiring facilities, fields and equipment, shall Long Beach Community College District issue $850,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens' oversight, independent audits, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, with funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66445, "no_votes": 36599, "total_votes": 103044, "percent_yes": 64.48216295951245, "percent_no": 35.51783704048755, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.325118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.720440", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students/veterans for jobs/universities by: building/upgrading classrooms/laboratories, for health services, small businesses, police, firefighting, technology/other careers; improving deteriorating gas/electrical/sewer lines/leaky roofs, earthquake safety, security and repairing/constructing/acquiring facilities, fields and equipment, shall Long Beach Community College District issue $850,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens' oversight, independent audits, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, with funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4478, "fingerprint": "2016|201600288|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600288|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8469beec14fecdf7", "measure_id": "201600288", "measure_letter": "LV", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City's General Plan and Municipal Code be amended to require: a new permit process for major development projects exceeding base sizes or heights of 32-36 feet, with exceptions such as single unit dwellings and some affordable housing projects; voter approval of major development projects and development agreements, excluding affordable housing and moderate income and senior housing projects, among others; and voter approval of changes to City land use and planning policy documents.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19786, "no_votes": 24475, "total_votes": 44261, "percent_yes": 44.70301168071214, "percent_no": 55.29698831928786, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.323906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.719710", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's General Plan and Municipal Code be amended to require: a new permit process for major development projects exceeding base sizes or heights of 32-36 feet, with exceptions such as single unit dwellings and some affordable housing projects; voter approval of major development projects and development agreements, excluding affordable housing and moderate income and senior housing projects, among others; and voter approval of changes to City land use and planning policy documents.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4446, "fingerprint": "2016|201600043|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600043|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bc5eb3cd44034413", "measure_id": "201600043", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve freeway traffic flow/safety; repair potholes/sidewalks; repave local streets; earthquake retrofit bridges; synchronize signals; keep senior/disabled/student fares affordable; expand rail/subway/bus systems; improve job/school/airport connections; and create jobs; shall voters authorize a Los Angeles County Traffic Improvement Plan through a \u00bd \u00a2 sales tax and continue the existing \u00bd \u00a2 traffic relief tax until voters decide to end it, with independent audits/oversight and funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2259654, "no_votes": 916375, "total_votes": 3176029, "percent_yes": 71.14714632643468, "percent_no": 28.85285367356532, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.312561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.712583", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve freeway traffic flow/safety; repair potholes/sidewalks; repave local streets; earthquake retrofit bridges; synchronize signals; keep senior/disabled/student fares affordable; expand rail/subway/bus systems; improve job/school/airport connections; and create jobs; shall voters authorize a Los Angeles County Traffic Improvement Plan through a \u00bd \u00a2 sales tax and continue the existing \u00bd \u00a2 traffic relief tax until voters decide to end it, with independent audits/oversight and funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4460, "fingerprint": "2016|201600268|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600268|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "abd6efb5f82ac2be", "measure_id": "201600268", "measure_letter": "MA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund public safety, 9-1-1 emergency response, police officers, homelessness, and general City services, shall Long Beach update gross receipts tax rates between 6-8% for medical marijuana dispensaries, 8-12% for nonmedical marijuana dispensaries, 6-8% for processing, distributing, transporting or testing marijuana/related products and a square foot tax between $12-15 for marijuana cultivation, raising approximately $13 million annually, requiring annual expenditure reports, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 103086, "no_votes": 47955, "total_votes": 151041, "percent_yes": 68.25034262220193, "percent_no": 31.749657377798073, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.317836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.716070", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund public safety, 9-1-1 emergency response, police officers, homelessness, and general City services, shall Long Beach update gross receipts tax rates between 6-8% for medical marijuana dispensaries, 8-12% for nonmedical marijuana dispensaries, 6-8% for processing, distributing, transporting or testing marijuana/related products and a square foot tax between $12-15 for marijuana cultivation, raising approximately $13 million annually, requiring annual expenditure reports, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4475, "fingerprint": "2016|201600285|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600285|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "415d8cb5a4e90797", "measure_id": "201600285", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted repealing the City's ban on marijuana businesses, reducing the City's tax on recreational and medical marijuana, and adopting regulations permitting approximately 32 retail medical marijuana businesses located in areas not zoned exclusively for residential use with minimum distance restrictions from sensitive uses, and providing for the establishment of an unspecified number of marijuana cultivation, distribution, manufacturing and testing businesses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89893, "no_votes": 59570, "total_votes": 149463, "percent_yes": 60.14398212266581, "percent_no": 39.85601787733419, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.323002", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.719158", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted repealing the City's ban on marijuana businesses, reducing the City's tax on recreational and medical marijuana, and adopting regulations permitting approximately 32 retail medical marijuana businesses located in areas not zoned exclusively for residential use with minimum distance restrictions from sensitive uses, and providing for the establishment of an unspecified number of marijuana cultivation, distribution, manufacturing and testing businesses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11272, "fingerprint": "2016|201600666|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600666|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "10295de418d364e0", "measure_id": "201600666", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve/maintain neighborhood schools by repairing/updating classrooms, science labs/technology, repairing leaky roofs, bathrooms, plumbing/electrical, improving school safety with lighting, fences, fire alarms, earthquake retrofits, removing asbestos, replacing portables with permanent classrooms, and acquiring, renovating, constructing/equipping school sites/facilities, shall Lynwood Unified School District issue $65,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring strict accountability, Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee review, independent annual audits, with no funds for administrator salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12015, "no_votes": 3069, "total_votes": 15084, "percent_yes": 79.65393794749403, "percent_no": 20.34606205250597, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.731870", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.330550", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.723837", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve/maintain neighborhood schools by repairing/updating classrooms, science labs/technology, repairing leaky roofs, bathrooms, plumbing/electrical, improving school safety with lighting, fences, fire alarms, earthquake retrofits, removing asbestos, replacing portables with permanent classrooms, and acquiring, renovating, constructing/equipping school sites/facilities, shall Lynwood Unified School District issue $65,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring strict accountability, Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee review, independent annual audits, with no funds for administrator salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4452, "fingerprint": "2016|201600257|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600257|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "00ad6a4044a36f5b", "measure_id": "201600257", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City's longstanding utility users' tax be repealed, eliminating approximately 9.5% of the revenues in the City's general fund annually ($17.5 million this year) that is used to pay for city services such as police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response, libraries, parks and senior services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10976, "no_votes": 27513, "total_votes": 38489, "percent_yes": 28.51723869157421, "percent_no": 71.4827613084258, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.314764", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.714053", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's longstanding utility users' tax be repealed, eliminating approximately 9.5% of the revenues in the City's general fund annually ($17.5 million this year) that is used to pay for city services such as police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response, libraries, parks and senior services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11274, "fingerprint": "2016|201600672|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600672|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "86dc10e3f62e7c88", "measure_id": "201600672", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct and refurbish classrooms throughout the district for engineering, math, technology and science; improve student access to modern technology; upgrade outdated plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; install campus security cameras and lighting; and repair, construct and modernize classrooms, shall Pomona Unified School District be authorized to issue $300 million of bonds with interest rates at or below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32705, "no_votes": 9261, "total_votes": 41966, "percent_yes": 77.9321355382929, "percent_no": 22.067864461707103, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.733007", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.332350", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.724956", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct and refurbish classrooms throughout the district for engineering, math, technology and science; improve student access to modern technology; upgrade outdated plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; install campus security cameras and lighting; and repair, construct and modernize classrooms, shall Pomona Unified School District be authorized to issue $300 million of bonds with interest rates at or below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4451, "fingerprint": "2016|201600256|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600256|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dda492975bc53771", "measure_id": "201600256", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To repair local streets/sidewalks; retain/hire firefighters/paramedics; increase sheriff's staffing to improve response times; expand gang/drug prevention, economic development and youth job training programs; improve parks; and provide other general fund services in Compton, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the sales tax by one percent on an ongoing basis to raise approximately $7 million in local annual funding, requiring citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6833, "no_votes": 6608, "total_votes": 13441, "percent_yes": 50.83699129529053, "percent_no": 49.16300870470947, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.314497", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.713869", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair local streets/sidewalks; retain/hire firefighters/paramedics; increase sheriff's staffing to improve response times; expand gang/drug prevention, economic development and youth job training programs; improve parks; and provide other general fund services in Compton, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the sales tax by one percent on an ongoing basis to raise approximately $7 million in local annual funding, requiring citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4498, "fingerprint": "2016|201600670|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600670|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "602fb9e8a162b9cf", "measure_id": "201600670", "measure_letter": "PSD", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "\u00a0To update classrooms, labs and learning technology for the twenty-first century; repair leaky roofs and windows; improve school safety, security, energy and water efficiency; accommodate growing enrollment; and repair, construct, and acquire equipment for classrooms, sites and facilities; shall Palmdale (Elementary) School District be authorized to issue up to $80,000,000 in bonds with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27437, "no_votes": 7397, "total_votes": 34834, "percent_yes": 78.76499971292415, "percent_no": 21.23500028707585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.331777", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.724580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "\u00a0To update classrooms, labs and learning technology for the twenty-first century; repair leaky roofs and windows; improve school safety, security, energy and water efficiency; accommodate growing enrollment; and repair, construct, and acquire equipment for classrooms, sites and facilities; shall Palmdale (Elementary) School District be authorized to issue up to $80,000,000 in bonds with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4494, "fingerprint": "2016|201600663|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600663|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "70f66bbc371b2baf", "measure_id": "201600663", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and provide safe, modern schools for all students with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade, modernize and construct classrooms, science labs and libraries; improve student access to technology; repair leaky roofs, outdated electrical and plumbing systems; and improve safety, security and access for students with disabilities shall Lennox School District issue $25,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens' oversight and NO money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4242, "no_votes": 833, "total_votes": 5075, "percent_yes": 83.58620689655173, "percent_no": 16.41379310344827, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.329631", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.723170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and provide safe, modern schools for all students with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade, modernize and construct classrooms, science labs and libraries; improve student access to technology; repair leaky roofs, outdated electrical and plumbing systems; and improve safety, security and access for students with disabilities shall Lennox School District issue $25,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens' oversight and NO money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4502, "fingerprint": "2016|201600675|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600675|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "43cf91ef2dc3f09b", "measure_id": "201600675", "measure_letter": "QS", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; update inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; upgrade/modernize 50-year-old classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; shall the South Whittier School District issue $29,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight, annual audits and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5975, "no_votes": 1253, "total_votes": 7228, "percent_yes": 82.66463752075262, "percent_no": 17.33536247924738, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.333292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.725504", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; update inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; upgrade/modernize 50-year-old classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; shall the South Whittier School District issue $29,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight, annual audits and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4487, "fingerprint": "2016|201600656|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600656|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8460bb97b7ba29ed", "measure_id": "201600656", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing existing property tax rates, shall the East Whittier City School District issue $70 million in bonds at legal interest rates to make essential upgrades to aging schools including repairing or replacing leaky roofs, doors, windows, outdated plumbing, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems, and improve student safety and school security systems, including lighting, smoke alarms, fencing and emergency communications, with independent citizen oversight and audits to ensure all money benefits and improves local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20323, "no_votes": 7221, "total_votes": 27544, "percent_yes": 73.78376415916352, "percent_no": 26.216235840836475, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.327511", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.721905", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing existing property tax rates, shall the East Whittier City School District issue $70 million in bonds at legal interest rates to make essential upgrades to aging schools including repairing or replacing leaky roofs, doors, windows, outdated plumbing, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems, and improve student safety and school security systems, including lighting, smoke alarms, fencing and emergency communications, with independent citizen oversight and audits to ensure all money benefits and improves local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4477, "fingerprint": "2016|201600287|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600287|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8556f8adc659b1f6", "measure_id": "201600287", "measure_letter": "RD", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help maintain vital city services including emergency response, neighborhood police patrols, drug and youth violence prevention programs, fire protection, street and pothole repair, parks and recreation programs; and other essential services, shall Lynwood establish a Rainy Day fund to provide short-term funding for such general services into which ten percent of any 2016-authorized tax revenues shall be deposited and spent only in cases of fiscal hardship?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9574, "no_votes": 4723, "total_votes": 14297, "percent_yes": 66.9650975729174, "percent_no": 33.0349024270826, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.323584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.719525", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help maintain vital city services including emergency response, neighborhood police patrols, drug and youth violence prevention programs, fire protection, street and pothole repair, parks and recreation programs; and other essential services, shall Lynwood establish a Rainy Day fund to provide short-term funding for such general services into which ten percent of any 2016-authorized tax revenues shall be deposited and spent only in cases of fiscal hardship?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4483, "fingerprint": "2016|201600650|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600650|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "45e6e5a62488dff0", "measure_id": "201600650", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support academic excellence, prepare Pico Rivera students for college and quality jobs, raise teacher salaries, retain quality teachers and staff, provide every student access to high quality arts education, including music and performing arts, and improve instruction in science, technology, engineering, arts and math, shall El Rancho Unified School District authorize an annual $99 per-parcel tax for 9 years, exempting senior citizens and people with disabilities, requiring independent oversight and all funds used locally to improve student learning?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19935, "no_votes": 6707, "total_votes": 26642, "percent_yes": 74.82546355378726, "percent_no": 25.17453644621274, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.326017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.720990", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support academic excellence, prepare Pico Rivera students for college and quality jobs, raise teacher salaries, retain quality teachers and staff, provide every student access to high quality arts education, including music and performing arts, and improve instruction in science, technology, engineering, arts and math, shall El Rancho Unified School District authorize an annual $99 per-parcel tax for 9 years, exempting senior citizens and people with disabilities, requiring independent oversight and all funds used locally to improve student learning?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4466, "fingerprint": "2016|201600274|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600274|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6be6b41b3499fa34", "measure_id": "201600274", "measure_letter": "RRR", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to: (1) add qualification requirements, stipends and removal protections for DWP Board; (2) expand Board to seven members; (3) require DWP prepare four-year Strategic Plans for Council and Mayoral approval; (4) modify DWP's contracting, rate-setting and other authority; (5) permit future alternatives to existing civil service standards for DWP employees through collective bargaining; and (6) require monthly billing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 538941, "no_votes": 557955, "total_votes": 1096896, "percent_yes": 49.13328155084894, "percent_no": 50.86671844915106, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.319482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.717161", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to: (1) add qualification requirements, stipends and removal protections for DWP Board; (2) expand Board to seven members; (3) require DWP prepare four-year Strategic Plans for Council and Mayoral approval; (4) modify DWP's contracting, rate-setting and other authority; (5) permit future alternatives to existing civil service standards for DWP employees through collective bargaining; and (6) require monthly billing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11268, "fingerprint": "2016|201600646|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600646|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4d9e20ad3a32e0ed", "measure_id": "201600646", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce student overcrowding and make safety, security, and health improvements; construct, renovate, modernize and equip classrooms and facilities at North, Valley and View Schools; replace or repair roofs; provide technology improvements for students; and upgrade or replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems, shall Hermosa Beach City School District issue $59,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, and have an independent citizens' oversight committee with no money for administrative salaries or taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4040, "no_votes": 2725, "total_votes": 6765, "percent_yes": 59.71914264597192, "percent_no": 40.28085735402808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.728286", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.324821", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.720257", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce student overcrowding and make safety, security, and health improvements; construct, renovate, modernize and equip classrooms and facilities at North, Valley and View Schools; replace or repair roofs; provide technology improvements for students; and upgrade or replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems, shall Hermosa Beach City School District issue $59,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, and have an independent citizens' oversight committee with no money for administrative salaries or taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4459, "fingerprint": "2016|201600267|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600267|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3dfe6c9cd66614fa", "measure_id": "201600267", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve city services including city-run police and fire departments, paramedic/9-1-1 emergency response, anti-gang/drug/crime programs, school safety, after-school and seniors programs; ensure fire engines and emergency vehicles have updated equipment; and repair streets/potholes; shall the ordinance to increase the sales tax by one-half of one percent, providing $9,000,000 annually, to expire after 20 years, requiring audits, public disclosure of funds, and all funds only for Downey be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21493, "no_votes": 12592, "total_votes": 34085, "percent_yes": 63.05706322429221, "percent_no": 36.94293677570779, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.317568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.715888", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve city services including city-run police and fire departments, paramedic/9-1-1 emergency response, anti-gang/drug/crime programs, school safety, after-school and seniors programs; ensure fire engines and emergency vehicles have updated equipment; and repair streets/potholes; shall the ordinance to increase the sales tax by one-half of one percent, providing $9,000,000 annually, to expire after 20 years, requiring audits, public disclosure of funds, and all funds only for Downey be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4468, "fingerprint": "2016|201600276|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600276|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "90637ccf001799b0", "measure_id": "201600276", "measure_letter": "SM", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article XXII of the City Charter be amended to, among other things: expand the prohibition against kickbacks as rewards for certain official actions, create an exemption for volunteers serving certain City-funded non-profits, clarify the application of the Article's prohibitions, the City Attorney's authority and enforcement responsibilities, and the scope of available remedies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32231, "no_votes": 6489, "total_votes": 38720, "percent_yes": 83.24121900826447, "percent_no": 16.758780991735534, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.320009", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.717526", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article XXII of the City Charter be amended to, among other things: expand the prohibition against kickbacks as rewards for certain official actions, create an exemption for volunteers serving certain City-funded non-profits, clarify the application of the Article's prohibitions, the City Attorney's authority and enforcement responsibilities, and the scope of available remedies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4501, "fingerprint": "2016|201600674|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600674|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "34a5dba57dc763f9", "measure_id": "201600674", "measure_letter": "SP", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade aging classrooms, sites and facilities; replace deteriorated roofs, plumbing, electrical, and air conditioning systems; retrofit buildings for earthquake safety; improve access for students with disabilities; remove hazardous materials like lead/asbestos; and upgrade/construct math, science, technology, visual and performing arts classrooms/facilities to support student achievement, shall South Pasadena Unified School District issue $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates to equip, acquire, and construct school facilities, with independent oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9357, "no_votes": 2997, "total_votes": 12354, "percent_yes": 75.74065080135989, "percent_no": 24.25934919864011, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.332995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.725320", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade aging classrooms, sites and facilities; replace deteriorated roofs, plumbing, electrical, and air conditioning systems; retrofit buildings for earthquake safety; improve access for students with disabilities; remove hazardous materials like lead/asbestos; and upgrade/construct math, science, technology, visual and performing arts classrooms/facilities to support student achievement, shall South Pasadena Unified School District issue $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates to equip, acquire, and construct school facilities, with independent oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4497, "fingerprint": "2016|201600669|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600669|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "39ef6ca8f071c9d8", "measure_id": "201600669", "measure_letter": "SS", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at local elementary schools with funding that cannot be taken away by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; remove mold; modernize, renovate and/or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and make health, seismic, safety and security improvements; shall Mountain View School District issue $57,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with oversight, annual audits and NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7492, "no_votes": 1168, "total_votes": 8660, "percent_yes": 86.51270207852194, "percent_no": 13.48729792147806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.331474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.724396", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at local elementary schools with funding that cannot be taken away by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; remove mold; modernize, renovate and/or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and make health, seismic, safety and security improvements; shall Mountain View School District issue $57,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with oversight, annual audits and NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4467, "fingerprint": "2016|201600275|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600275|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bfffd9f5c5a722b7", "measure_id": "201600275", "measure_letter": "SSS", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to: (1) enroll new Airport peace officers into Tier 6 of the Fire and Police Pensions System; (2) allow current Airport peace officers to transfer into Tier 6 from the City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS) at their own expense; and (3) permit new Airport Police Chiefs to enroll in LACERS?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 544885, "no_votes": 525479, "total_votes": 1070364, "percent_yes": 50.906514045689136, "percent_no": 49.093485954310864, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.319746", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.717342", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to: (1) enroll new Airport peace officers into Tier 6 of the Fire and Police Pensions System; (2) allow current Airport peace officers to transfer into Tier 6 from the City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS) at their own expense; and (3) permit new Airport Police Chiefs to enroll in LACERS?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4474, "fingerprint": "2016|201600284|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600284|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0b096b0a00266ec2", "measure_id": "201600284", "measure_letter": "TL", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 16-1598, establishing a lifetime term limit of three (3) terms of four (4) years each served as an elected official in the City of Carson, including Mayor, member of the City Council, City Clerk, City Treasurer, or any combination of elected offices, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23805, "no_votes": 6998, "total_votes": 30803, "percent_yes": 77.2814336265948, "percent_no": 22.718566373405196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.322557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.718974", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 16-1598, establishing a lifetime term limit of three (3) terms of four (4) years each served as an elected official in the City of Carson, including Mayor, member of the City Council, City Clerk, City Treasurer, or any combination of elected offices, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4449, "fingerprint": "2016|201600253|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600253|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a8abff61245b162e", "measure_id": "201600253", "measure_letter": "UUT", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City services, such as Public Safety, Paramedic and Library services, shall an Ordinance be adopted to: 1) Increase the City's Utility Users' Tax (UUT) to a maximum of 10% for all utilities, to be effective on July 1, 2016; and 2) Extend and stabilize the funding by eliminating the \"sunset\" clause; and 3) Provide an exemption from the UUT for very low income households?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1921, "no_votes": 737, "total_votes": 2658, "percent_yes": 72.27238525206923, "percent_no": 27.727614747930772, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.313691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.713320", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City services, such as Public Safety, Paramedic and Library services, shall an Ordinance be adopted to: 1) Increase the City's Utility Users' Tax (UUT) to a maximum of 10% for all utilities, to be effective on July 1, 2016; and 2) Extend and stabilize the funding by eliminating the \"sunset\" clause; and 3) Provide an exemption from the UUT for very low income households?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4500, "fingerprint": "2016|201600673|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600673|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "abc4a08fef943aa2", "measure_id": "201600673", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local access to affordable higher education for high school graduates/adults/veterans; improve education/career training in math, science, writing, arts, business; shall Santa Monica Community College District issue $345,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizens oversight/annual audits, to repair, upgrade, construct, modernize, equip facilities for technology, science/biotech, college readiness; repair aging, leaky classrooms, remove asbestos, upgrade disabled access, seismic and campus safety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30970, "no_votes": 17497, "total_votes": 48467, "percent_yes": 63.899147873811046, "percent_no": 36.100852126188954, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.332647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.725136", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local access to affordable higher education for high school graduates/adults/veterans; improve education/career training in math, science, writing, arts, business; shall Santa Monica Community College District issue $345,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizens oversight/annual audits, to repair, upgrade, construct, modernize, equip facilities for technology, science/biotech, college readiness; repair aging, leaky classrooms, remove asbestos, upgrade disabled access, seismic and campus safety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11266, "fingerprint": "2016|201600281|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600281|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "605cbe6a1006f1b0", "measure_id": "201600281", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposition by the City of Bellflower to sell the Bellflower Municipal Water System to California-American Water Company be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10628, "no_votes": 9080, "total_votes": 19708, "percent_yes": 53.927339151613566, "percent_no": 46.072660848386434, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.726276", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.321415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.718430", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposition by the City of Bellflower to sell the Bellflower Municipal Water System to California-American Water Company be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4455, "fingerprint": "2016|201600262|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600262|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c61fa419bf46474b", "measure_id": "201600262", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Montebello sell the Montebello Water System to San Gabriel Valley Water Company to create additional City revenues for essential services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5270, "no_votes": 5440, "total_votes": 10710, "percent_yes": 49.2063492063492, "percent_no": 50.7936507936508, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.316161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.714975", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Montebello sell the Montebello Water System to San Gabriel Valley Water Company to create additional City revenues for essential services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4503, "fingerprint": "2016|201600676|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600676|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8cffa5908d79e94d", "measure_id": "201600676", "measure_letter": "WV", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities, libraries, and instructional technology to support student achievement in math, science, engineering, technology, and skilled trades, acquire, construct and repair classrooms, facilities, sites and equipment including repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, and improve student safety and camera security systems, shall Walnut Valley Unified School District issue $152,880,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, and all money locally-controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12402, "no_votes": 6699, "total_votes": 19101, "percent_yes": 64.92853777289147, "percent_no": 35.071462227108526, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.333589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.725685", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities, libraries, and instructional technology to support student achievement in math, science, engineering, technology, and skilled trades, acquire, construct and repair classrooms, facilities, sites and equipment including repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, and improve student safety and camera security systems, shall Walnut Valley Unified School District issue $152,880,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, and all money locally-controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4456, "fingerprint": "2016|201600264|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600264|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "65af417ba7283d46", "measure_id": "201600264", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Avalon Municipal Code be amended to permit up to two medical marijuana dispensaries and similar facilities, both fixed and mobile, to operate within the City, and to permit the cultivation, manufacture and processing of medical marijuana products, subject to specified standards, and further subject to a $10,000 annual license tax and a 12% transaction fee/tax on each individual medical marijuana sale, until repealed by voters, and generating approximately $200,000 annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 421, "no_votes": 727, "total_votes": 1148, "percent_yes": 36.67247386759582, "percent_no": 63.32752613240418, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.316714", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.715344", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Avalon Municipal Code be amended to permit up to two medical marijuana dispensaries and similar facilities, both fixed and mobile, to operate within the City, and to permit the cultivation, manufacture and processing of medical marijuana products, subject to specified standards, and further subject to a $10,000 annual license tax and a 12% transaction fee/tax on each individual medical marijuana sale, until repealed by voters, and generating approximately $200,000 annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11270, "fingerprint": "2016|201600654|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600654|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "96484ae879570a89", "measure_id": "201600654", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve aging Beverly Hills schools, upgrade inefficient heating, cooling/electrical systems causing significant maintenance cost savings redirected to classroom instruction, upgrade/repair classrooms, libraries/science labs, replace deteriorating restrooms/leaky roofs, complete deferred maintenance projects, provide modern classroom technology infrastructure, upgrade, construct/acquire classrooms, facilities/sites with local funding the State cannot take away, shall Beverly Hills Unified School District issue $260,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with strict citizen oversight, annual audits/all funds for Beverly Hills schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8429, "no_votes": 4737, "total_votes": 13166, "percent_yes": 64.02096308673858, "percent_no": 35.979036913261425, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.729607", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.326925", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.721542", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve aging Beverly Hills schools, upgrade inefficient heating, cooling/electrical systems causing significant maintenance cost savings redirected to classroom instruction, upgrade/repair classrooms, libraries/science labs, replace deteriorating restrooms/leaky roofs, complete deferred maintenance projects, provide modern classroom technology infrastructure, upgrade, construct/acquire classrooms, facilities/sites with local funding the State cannot take away, shall Beverly Hills Unified School District issue $260,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with strict citizen oversight, annual audits/all funds for Beverly Hills schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4453, "fingerprint": "2016|201600259|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600259|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d9b0add37065a4c3", "measure_id": "201600259", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Pomona zoning ordinance be amended to authorize the installation of outdoor advertising signs within specific freeway adjacent corridors and to impose planning regulations and restrictions concerning the number and location of the outdoor advertising signs, and to establish development fees to be paid to the City of Pomona in an amount of $1 million for each billboard installed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9423, "no_votes": 10031, "total_votes": 19454, "percent_yes": 48.43733936465508, "percent_no": 51.56266063534492, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.315362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.714423", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pomona zoning ordinance be amended to authorize the installation of outdoor advertising signs within specific freeway adjacent corridors and to impose planning regulations and restrictions concerning the number and location of the outdoor advertising signs, and to establish development fees to be paid to the City of Pomona in an amount of $1 million for each billboard installed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4488, "fingerprint": "2016|201600657|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600657|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4d6e4c5a8c1a37c2", "measure_id": "201600657", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing existing property tax rates, shall the East Whittier City School District issue $24 million in bonds at legal interest rates, to modernize classrooms, science labs and computer systems for science, math and technology instruction, replace aging portables, renovate the aging middle school gymnasiums and locker rooms, and improve accessibility for disabled students, with independent citizen oversight and audits to ensure all money benefits and improves local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19938, "no_votes": 7211, "total_votes": 27149, "percent_yes": 73.43916903016687, "percent_no": 26.560830969833134, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.327861", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.722087", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing existing property tax rates, shall the East Whittier City School District issue $24 million in bonds at legal interest rates, to modernize classrooms, science labs and computer systems for science, math and technology instruction, replace aging portables, renovate the aging middle school gymnasiums and locker rooms, and improve accessibility for disabled students, with independent citizen oversight and audits to ensure all money benefits and improves local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4506, "fingerprint": "2016|201600678|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600678|MADERA", "content_hash": "a1827377d2b4c121", "measure_id": "201600678", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Fresno City, Clovis, Reedley Colleges, to prepare students and veterans for jobs/university transfer by upgrading classroom buildings, labs/technology, upgrading vocational/career education programs, removing leading paint/asbestos, repairing leaky roofs, wiring, gas/sewer lines and acquiring, construct/repairing facilities, sites/equipment. Shall State Center Community College District issue $485,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13337, "no_votes": 9066, "total_votes": 22403, "percent_yes": 59.53220550819087, "percent_no": 40.46779449180913, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.334579", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.726229", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Fresno City, Clovis, Reedley Colleges, to prepare students and veterans for jobs/university transfer by upgrading classroom buildings, labs/technology, upgrading vocational/career education programs, removing leading paint/asbestos, repairing leaky roofs, wiring, gas/sewer lines and acquiring, construct/repairing facilities, sites/equipment. Shall State Center Community College District issue $485,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4507, "fingerprint": "2016|201600680|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600680|MADERA", "content_hash": "70965ab659c48d0e", "measure_id": "201600680", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging classrooms; remove asbestos/lead paint; upgrade school safety/security; water conservation/ recycling systems; improve agricultural education; technology, computer/science labs, vocational programs; repair, construct/retrofit classrooms, sites/equipment; maintain student health/safety and retain/attract quality teachers, shall Firebaugh-Las Deltas Unified School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no administrator salaries, preventing Sacramento from taking funds, and keeping all funds local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97, "no_votes": 41, "total_votes": 138, "percent_yes": 70.28985507246377, "percent_no": 29.710144927536234, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.334876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.726447", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging classrooms; remove asbestos/lead paint; upgrade school safety/security; water conservation/ recycling systems; improve agricultural education; technology, computer/science labs, vocational programs; repair, construct/retrofit classrooms, sites/equipment; maintain student health/safety and retain/attract quality teachers, shall Firebaugh-Las Deltas Unified School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no administrator salaries, preventing Sacramento from taking funds, and keeping all funds local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4508, "fingerprint": "2016|201600679|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600679|MADERA", "content_hash": "f3032ee16baa96a6", "measure_id": "201600679", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize/renovate or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace portable classrooms; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Chowchilla Elementary School District issue $13 million of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2958, "no_votes": 1175, "total_votes": 4133, "percent_yes": 71.57028792644569, "percent_no": 28.429712073554313, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.335174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.726647", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize/renovate or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace portable classrooms; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Chowchilla Elementary School District issue $13 million of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4505, "fingerprint": "2016|201600290|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600290|MADERA", "content_hash": "93093037f69d2907", "measure_id": "201600290", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve general city services including fast response to 9-1-1 emergencies/fires, adding police officers/neighborhood patrols/youth services to reduce gang activity/drug-related crimes, repairing potholes, and maintaining local streets/parks/facilities/infrastructure, shall NO City of Madera establish an ongoing 1/2 cent sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $3.5 million annually, requiring independent audits and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9633, "no_votes": 2184, "total_votes": 11817, "percent_yes": 81.51815181518151, "percent_no": 18.48184818481849, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.334277", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.726047", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve general city services including fast response to 9-1-1 emergencies/fires, adding police officers/neighborhood patrols/youth services to reduce gang activity/drug-related crimes, repairing potholes, and maintaining local streets/parks/facilities/infrastructure, shall NO City of Madera establish an ongoing 1/2 cent sales tax until ended by voters, providing approximately $3.5 million annually, requiring independent audits and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11276, "fingerprint": "2016|201600681|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600681|MARIN", "content_hash": "28a04581207ffd76", "measure_id": "201600681", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education with approximately $3 million in annual local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Larkspur-Corte Madera School District continue supporting exceptional instructional programs, including math, science, reading and writing; small class sizes; highly qualified teachers by renewing local school funding for eight years at the 2016-17 residential rate, adding $185 for a total of $679 per parcel, with annual inflation adjustments, senior exemptions and all funds benefiting Larkspur-Corte Madera School District elementary/middle school students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2697, "no_votes": 1262, "total_votes": 3959, "percent_yes": 68.12326345036625, "percent_no": 31.876736549633748, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.737243", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.339305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.728866", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education with approximately $3 million in annual local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Larkspur-Corte Madera School District continue supporting exceptional instructional programs, including math, science, reading and writing; small class sizes; highly qualified teachers by renewing local school funding for eight years at the 2016-17 residential rate, adding $185 for a total of $679 per parcel, with annual inflation adjustments, senior exemptions and all funds benefiting Larkspur-Corte Madera School District elementary/middle school students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4513, "fingerprint": "2016|201600048|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600048|MARIN", "content_hash": "64a74a5d27d2f0f5", "measure_id": "201600048", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To support the health, education and safety of underserved children with approximately $12,000,000 in annual local funding the State cannot take away, shall County of Marin expand access to quality preschool education; provide healthcare including early screenings, vision, dental and behavioral/mental health services; expand afterschool/summer learning programs promoting reading/writing/math achievement; and provide affordable childcare for infants, toddlers and young children by enacting a \u00bc% sales tax for 9 years with independent oversight/audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84271, "no_votes": 48945, "total_votes": 133216, "percent_yes": 63.25891784770599, "percent_no": 36.74108215229401, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.336937", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.727569", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support the health, education and safety of underserved children with approximately $12,000,000 in annual local funding the State cannot take away, shall County of Marin expand access to quality preschool education; provide healthcare including early screenings, vision, dental and behavioral/mental health services; expand afterschool/summer learning programs promoting reading/writing/math achievement; and provide affordable childcare for infants, toddlers and young children by enacting a \u00bc% sales tax for 9 years with independent oversight/audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4509, "fingerprint": "2016|201600044|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600044|MARIN", "content_hash": "c9ac6c8127701fb7", "measure_id": "201600044", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71862, "no_votes": 25906, "total_votes": 97768, "percent_yes": 73.50257753048032, "percent_no": 26.497422469519677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.335540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.726839", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11277, "fingerprint": "2016|201600683|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600683|MARIN", "content_hash": "31d3904057236b65", "measure_id": "201600683", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away, ensure excellence in core academic programs, attract and retain highly-qualified teachers, maintain small class sizes, and enhance enrichment programs, shall the Kentfield School District be authorized to levy $1600 per parcel annually for ten (10) years, with a 5% annual increase, provide a senior citizens' exemption, and have all funds stay local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4006, "no_votes": 3001, "total_votes": 7007, "percent_yes": 57.17140002854288, "percent_no": 42.82859997145712, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.737620", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.339904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.729240", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away, ensure excellence in core academic programs, attract and retain highly-qualified teachers, maintain small class sizes, and enhance enrichment programs, shall the Kentfield School District be authorized to levy $1600 per parcel annually for ten (10) years, with a 5% annual increase, provide a senior citizens' exemption, and have all funds stay local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4519, "fingerprint": "2016|201600682|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600682|MARIN", "content_hash": "7457e2822f8cf290", "measure_id": "201600682", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update/maintain College of Marin campuses that prepare students for 4-year universities and careers, shall Marin Community College District modernize classrooms, science, computer/biotechnology labs; repair, modernize and provide job-training classrooms; ensure classrooms meet earthquake, fire and safety codes; provide access for disabled students; and repair, construct, acquire, and equip classrooms, labs, sites and facilities by issuing $265,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, which cannot be taken by the State, with citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61006, "no_votes": 34258, "total_votes": 95264, "percent_yes": 64.03888142425261, "percent_no": 35.96111857574739, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.339614", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.729048", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update/maintain College of Marin campuses that prepare students for 4-year universities and careers, shall Marin Community College District modernize classrooms, science, computer/biotechnology labs; repair, modernize and provide job-training classrooms; ensure classrooms meet earthquake, fire and safety codes; provide access for disabled students; and repair, construct, acquire, and equip classrooms, labs, sites and facilities by issuing $265,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, which cannot be taken by the State, with citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11275, "fingerprint": "2016|201600293|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600293|MARIN", "content_hash": "6229a02bd767770a", "measure_id": "201600293", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Fairfax extend the existing one-half percent local sales tax and increase the rate by one-quarter percent to provide funding that cannot be taken by the State, and can be used for a period of 10 years subject to annual independent audits to maintain and enhance quality public safety and general services, improve infrastructure such as repairing sidewalks, pedestrian trails, repaving streets, and enhancing downtown, while retaining Fairfax\u2019s character?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3656, "no_votes": 1115, "total_votes": 4771, "percent_yes": 76.62963739258018, "percent_no": 23.37036260741982, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.736670", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.338361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.728304", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Fairfax extend the existing one-half percent local sales tax and increase the rate by one-quarter percent to provide funding that cannot be taken by the State, and can be used for a period of 10 years subject to annual independent audits to maintain and enhance quality public safety and general services, improve infrastructure such as repairing sidewalks, pedestrian trails, repaving streets, and enhancing downtown, while retaining Fairfax\u2019s character?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4516, "fingerprint": "2016|201600292|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600292|MARIN", "content_hash": "4c3c8b46a16cbb38", "measure_id": "201600292", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue adjusting its appropriation limit for the annual fire protection and emergency medical services levy, pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, for the period of 7/1/2016 through 6/30/2020? The levy for FY 2015-2016 shall not exceed the rate authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code. (The current levy is $702 per residential dwelling unit, $800 per occupancy in commercial structures, and $141 per vacant parcel.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 680, "no_votes": 200, "total_votes": 880, "percent_yes": 77.27272727272727, "percent_no": 22.727272727272734, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.338062", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.728118", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue adjusting its appropriation limit for the annual fire protection and emergency medical services levy, pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, for the period of 7/1/2016 through 6/30/2020? The levy for FY 2015-2016 shall not exceed the rate authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code. (The current levy is $702 per residential dwelling unit, $800 per occupancy in commercial structures, and $141 per vacant parcel.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4515, "fingerprint": "2016|201600291|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600291|MARIN", "content_hash": "592a37f4858d59db", "measure_id": "201600291", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide a critical, consistent, locally-controlled funding source, augmenting current general fund allocations for the San Rafael Public Library to maintain library hours, equipment, materials, and services for children, teens, and adults, shall the City of San Rafael be authorized to levy an annual $59 parcel tax (slightly higher for multiple-residential unit parcels) for a period of nine (9) years with annual CPI adjustment, oversight by an independent citizens committee and exemptions for senior citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12879, "no_votes": 5758, "total_votes": 18637, "percent_yes": 69.10446960347696, "percent_no": 30.895530396523043, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.337772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.727936", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a critical, consistent, locally-controlled funding source, augmenting current general fund allocations for the San Rafael Public Library to maintain library hours, equipment, materials, and services for children, teens, and adults, shall the City of San Rafael be authorized to levy an annual $59 parcel tax (slightly higher for multiple-residential unit parcels) for a period of nine (9) years with annual CPI adjustment, oversight by an independent citizens committee and exemptions for senior citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4520, "fingerprint": "2016|201600684|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600684|MARIN", "content_hash": "209cef7f0e7a8c85", "measure_id": "201600684", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Continuation of Mill Valley School District Special Assessment for Educational Programs and Services. To maintain outstanding schools and high-quality teachers with approximately $9.4 million in annual funding, shall Mill Valley School District continue its existing school parcel tax beginning in 2017-18 for twelve years at the rate of $980 per parcel with annual cost-of-living adjustments, maintaining existing accountability measures and with all revenues kept local and used exclusively for Mill Valley elementary and middle schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12473, "no_votes": 6201, "total_votes": 18674, "percent_yes": 66.79340259183893, "percent_no": 33.20659740816107, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.340200", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.729423", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Continuation of Mill Valley School District Special Assessment for Educational Programs and Services. To maintain outstanding schools and high-quality teachers with approximately $9.4 million in annual funding, shall Mill Valley School District continue its existing school parcel tax beginning in 2017-18 for twelve years at the rate of $980 per parcel with annual cost-of-living adjustments, maintaining existing accountability measures and with all revenues kept local and used exclusively for Mill Valley elementary and middle schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4521, "fingerprint": "2016|201600685|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600685|MARIN", "content_hash": "00dcd7670908a205", "measure_id": "201600685", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update aging Novato schools and protect quality education with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Novato Unified School District upgrade classrooms, science labs, libraries and facilities to meet current academic/safety standards; provide dedicated space for science, math, engineering arts and music instruction; and improve student access to modern instructional technology by issuing $222 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17499, "no_votes": 12684, "total_votes": 30183, "percent_yes": 57.9763442997714, "percent_no": 42.0236557002286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.340582", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.729604", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update aging Novato schools and protect quality education with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Novato Unified School District upgrade classrooms, science labs, libraries and facilities to meet current academic/safety standards; provide dedicated space for science, math, engineering arts and music instruction; and improve student access to modern instructional technology by issuing $222 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4517, "fingerprint": "2016|201600294|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600294|MARIN", "content_hash": "9af9292daa680a87", "measure_id": "201600294", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To renew funding exclusively for improved fire safety activities, street maintenance, and road repair, shall the Mill Valley Municipal Service Tax be renewed within the City of Mill Valley Community Facilities District Number 2016-1, at a rate of $266 for single family residential property, with a 2% annual adjustment, raising an average of $1.79 million annually over 10 years, and shall the appropriations limit be established, all as specified in Mill Valley City Council Resolution No. 16-39?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6661, "no_votes": 1953, "total_votes": 8614, "percent_yes": 77.3276062224286, "percent_no": 22.6723937775714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.338673", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.728497", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew funding exclusively for improved fire safety activities, street maintenance, and road repair, shall the Mill Valley Municipal Service Tax be renewed within the City of Mill Valley Community Facilities District Number 2016-1, at a rate of $266 for single family residential property, with a 2% annual adjustment, raising an average of $1.79 million annually over 10 years, and shall the appropriations limit be established, all as specified in Mill Valley City Council Resolution No. 16-39?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4518, "fingerprint": "2016|201600295|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600295|MARIN", "content_hash": "98713ea3576218ab", "measure_id": "201600295", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the Town of Ross adopt an ordinance to reauthorize from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2025, the annual special tax for maintaining public safety services at a rate of $970 per dwelling unit for single family residences and $970 per parcel for all other uses, with an annual cost of living adjustment on both, providing about $810,000 annually, and increasing the Town's appropriations limit by the amount of the special tax proceeds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1097, "no_votes": 297, "total_votes": 1394, "percent_yes": 78.69440459110474, "percent_no": 21.305595408895257, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.338959", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.728682", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the Town of Ross adopt an ordinance to reauthorize from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2025, the annual special tax for maintaining public safety services at a rate of $970 per dwelling unit for single family residences and $970 per parcel for all other uses, with an annual cost of living adjustment on both, providing about $810,000 annually, and increasing the Town's appropriations limit by the amount of the special tax proceeds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4514, "fingerprint": "2016|201600049|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600049|MARIN", "content_hash": "0bbc83fe2d15363e", "measure_id": "201600049", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-07-13 to impose a special tax for fire protection, including fuel abatement and emergency preparedness, in the Muir Beach Community Services District. To provide critical funding for fire protection services, including fuel abatement, emergency preparedness and equipment upgrades, shall Muir Beach CSD Ordinance No. 2016-07-13, which imposes an annual $213.00 parcel tax for 10 years with annual CPI adjustment, be approved and shall the Muir Beach CSD appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter approved tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 226, "no_votes": 51, "total_votes": 277, "percent_yes": 81.58844765342961, "percent_no": 18.41155234657039, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.337377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.727754", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-07-13 to impose a special tax for fire protection, including fuel abatement and emergency preparedness, in the Muir Beach Community Services District. To provide critical funding for fire protection services, including fuel abatement, emergency preparedness and equipment upgrades, shall Muir Beach CSD Ordinance No. 2016-07-13, which imposes an annual $213.00 parcel tax for 10 years with annual CPI adjustment, be approved and shall the Muir Beach CSD appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter approved tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4510, "fingerprint": "2016|201600045|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600045|MARIN", "content_hash": "f0ee30a525b4b6ea", "measure_id": "201600045", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the special tax for Sheriff deputy patrol services, levied annually upon living units located within CSA 17 (Kent Woodlands), be increased from $260.00 per year to $360.00 per year, subject to an annual inflation adjustment not to exceed 3% per year, for each living unit within that area commencing with the 2016-2017 fiscal year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 639, "no_votes": 311, "total_votes": 950, "percent_yes": 67.26315789473685, "percent_no": 32.73684210526315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.335830", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.727020", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the special tax for Sheriff deputy patrol services, levied annually upon living units located within CSA 17 (Kent Woodlands), be increased from $260.00 per year to $360.00 per year, subject to an annual inflation adjustment not to exceed 3% per year, for each living unit within that area commencing with the 2016-2017 fiscal year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4511, "fingerprint": "2016|201600046|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600046|MARIN", "content_hash": "fb9779d4aa33688b", "measure_id": "201600046", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special tax to purchase and install License Plate Readers (LPR) that record the license plates of vehicles traveling through the Kent Woodlands neighborhood so as to deter criminal activities, such as burglary, be levied in the amount of $100.00 for the 2016-2017 fiscal year and then in the amount of $11.00 annually each fiscal year thereafter for maintenance of the LPR upon living units located within CSA 17 (Kent Woodlands area)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 685, "no_votes": 274, "total_votes": 959, "percent_yes": 71.42857142857143, "percent_no": 28.57142857142857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.336180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.727200", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax to purchase and install License Plate Readers (LPR) that record the license plates of vehicles traveling through the Kent Woodlands neighborhood so as to deter criminal activities, such as burglary, be levied in the amount of $100.00 for the 2016-2017 fiscal year and then in the amount of $11.00 annually each fiscal year thereafter for maintenance of the LPR upon living units located within CSA 17 (Kent Woodlands area)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4512, "fingerprint": "2016|201600047|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600047|MARIN", "content_hash": "7a0606e2b5dd50fc", "measure_id": "201600047", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "For ongoing maintenance dredging in the principal waterways of Paradise Cay along with the north and south entry channels to San Francisco Bay, shall the existing parcel tax of $1,200 on each original lot be increased to $1,500, providing $204,000 annually for 10 years, commencing in fiscal year beginning July 2017 in County Service Area No. 29, with increases limited to 3% per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 168, "no_votes": 20, "total_votes": 188, "percent_yes": 89.36170212765957, "percent_no": 10.63829787234043, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.336468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.727384", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For ongoing maintenance dredging in the principal waterways of Paradise Cay along with the north and south entry channels to San Francisco Bay, shall the existing parcel tax of $1,200 on each original lot be increased to $1,500, providing $204,000 annually for 10 years, commencing in fiscal year beginning July 2017 in County Service Area No. 29, with increases limited to 3% per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4522, "fingerprint": "2016|201600686|MARIPOSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600686|MARIPOSA", "content_hash": "c0e2c1cbee0451ad", "measure_id": "201600686", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mariposa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs;\r\n= upgrade deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; update inadequate electrical systems; replace outdated heating and air-conditioning systems; and modernize, construct and/or renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Mariposa County Unified School District issue $24,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6066, "no_votes": 2528, "total_votes": 8594, "percent_yes": 70.58412846171748, "percent_no": 29.415871538282516, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.340879", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.729793", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs;\r\n= upgrade deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; update inadequate electrical systems; replace outdated heating and air-conditioning systems; and modernize, construct and/or renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Mariposa County Unified School District issue $24,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mariposa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4531, "fingerprint": "2016|201600297|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600297|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "10b875d35d06578b", "measure_id": "201600297", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 924-2016 amending portions of Chapter 3.12 of the Fort Bragg Municipal Code to increase the City of Fort Bragg's existing Transient Occupancy Tax (a bed tax paid when overnight visitors rent a room) from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) to fund public services and maintain public areas, effective April 1, 2017, which proposed rate increase and amendment is anticipated to raise an additional $400,000 per year in revenue and which will continue until repealed by the City Council or the city voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1546, "no_votes": 1050, "total_votes": 2596, "percent_yes": 59.55315870570108, "percent_no": 40.44684129429892, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.343659", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.731540", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 924-2016 amending portions of Chapter 3.12 of the Fort Bragg Municipal Code to increase the City of Fort Bragg's existing Transient Occupancy Tax (a bed tax paid when overnight visitors rent a room) from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) to fund public services and maintain public areas, effective April 1, 2017, which proposed rate increase and amendment is anticipated to raise an additional $400,000 per year in revenue and which will continue until repealed by the City Council or the city voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4535, "fingerprint": "2016|201600301|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600301|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "76825caec6517a39", "measure_id": "201600301", "measure_letter": "AB", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"AA\" is approved by voters, shall the People of the City of Fort Bragg advise the City Council to use the additional funds in the following manner: (i) One-half of the revenues to substantially increase promotions, events, and marketing for Fort Bragg; (ii) One-quarter of the revenues to enhance Coastal Trail maintenance and security; (iii) One-eighth of the revenues to support establishment of the Noyo Center for Marine Sciences as a premiere visitor attraction; and (iv) One-eighth of the revenues to undertake special projects that support tourism and benefit the community including, but not limited to, repair and enhancement of local athletic fields?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1765, "no_votes": 769, "total_votes": 2534, "percent_yes": 69.65272296764009, "percent_no": 30.347277032359912, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.344936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.732270", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"AA\" is approved by voters, shall the People of the City of Fort Bragg advise the City Council to use the additional funds in the following manner: (i) One-half of the revenues to substantially increase promotions, events, and marketing for Fort Bragg; (ii) One-quarter of the revenues to enhance Coastal Trail maintenance and security; (iii) One-eighth of the revenues to support establishment of the Noyo Center for Marine Sciences as a premiere visitor attraction; and (iv) One-eighth of the revenues to undertake special projects that support tourism and benefit the community including, but not limited to, repair and enhancement of local athletic fields?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4532, "fingerprint": "2016|201600298|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600298|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "09cf3c7249d8b7a9", "measure_id": "201600298", "measure_letter": "AC", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 227 amending portions of Chapter 3.30.030 of the Point Arena Municipal Code to increase the City of Point Arena's existing Transient Occupany Tax (a bed tax paid when overnight visitors rent a room) from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) to fund public services and maintain public areas, effective April 1, 2017, which proposed rate increase and amendment is anticipated to raise an additional $17,000 per year in revenue and which will continue until repealed by the City Council or the city voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121, "no_votes": 63, "total_votes": 184, "percent_yes": 65.76086956521739, "percent_no": 34.23913043478261, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.343968", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.731721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 227 amending portions of Chapter 3.30.030 of the Point Arena Municipal Code to increase the City of Point Arena's existing Transient Occupany Tax (a bed tax paid when overnight visitors rent a room) from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) to fund public services and maintain public areas, effective April 1, 2017, which proposed rate increase and amendment is anticipated to raise an additional $17,000 per year in revenue and which will continue until repealed by the City Council or the city voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4536, "fingerprint": "2016|201600302|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600302|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "7abe518c9bddfd8b", "measure_id": "201600302", "measure_letter": "AD", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"AC\" is approved by voters, shall the People of the City of Point Arena advise the City Council to use the additional funds generated by the additional 2% of the Transient Occupancy Tax in the following manner: (1) One-quarter of the revenues to substantially increase promotion and marketing for Point Arena; (2) one quarter of the revenues to support events such as the Independence Day Celebration and Harbor Festival; (3)one quarter of the revenues to fund maintenance and improvement to the Arena Pier and City Property at the Cove; and (4) one quarter of the revenue for Park and Parking Improvements in the downtown area that support tourism and benefit the community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 135, "no_votes": 50, "total_votes": 185, "percent_yes": 72.97297297297297, "percent_no": 27.02702702702703, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.345224", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.732454", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"AC\" is approved by voters, shall the People of the City of Point Arena advise the City Council to use the additional funds generated by the additional 2% of the Transient Occupancy Tax in the following manner: (1) One-quarter of the revenues to substantially increase promotion and marketing for Point Arena; (2) one quarter of the revenues to support events such as the Independence Day Celebration and Harbor Festival; (3)one quarter of the revenues to fund maintenance and improvement to the Arena Pier and City Property at the Cove; and (4) one quarter of the revenue for Park and Parking Improvements in the downtown area that support tourism and benefit the community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4533, "fingerprint": "2016|201600299|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600299|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "16bf6970eec3bb85", "measure_id": "201600299", "measure_letter": "AE", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to help fund general municipal services, including but not limited to such matters as maintenance of public facilities such as parks and buildings, economic development and general improvements throughout the City, shall an ordinance to impose a tax at a rate of not more than seven (7) cents per each $1.00 of proceeds or fractional part thereof on non-medical cannabis or marijuana businesses and a tax at a rate of not more that three (3) cents per each $1.00 of proceeds or fractional part thereof on medical cannabis or marijuana businesses operating in the City of Point Arena be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 113, "no_votes": 68, "total_votes": 181, "percent_yes": 62.430939226519335, "percent_no": 37.569060773480665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.344353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.731902", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to help fund general municipal services, including but not limited to such matters as maintenance of public facilities such as parks and buildings, economic development and general improvements throughout the City, shall an ordinance to impose a tax at a rate of not more than seven (7) cents per each $1.00 of proceeds or fractional part thereof on non-medical cannabis or marijuana businesses and a tax at a rate of not more that three (3) cents per each $1.00 of proceeds or fractional part thereof on medical cannabis or marijuana businesses operating in the City of Point Arena be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4528, "fingerprint": "2016|201600055|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600055|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "53e33fde6ab9370f", "measure_id": "201600055", "measure_letter": "AF", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an Initiative of the People of the County of Mendocino to Regulate Medical Cannabis Cultivation, Processing, Testing, Distribution, Transportation, Delivery and Dispensing be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13772, "no_votes": 22534, "total_votes": 36306, "percent_yes": 37.93312400154244, "percent_no": 62.06687599845756, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.342759", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.730984", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an Initiative of the People of the County of Mendocino to Regulate Medical Cannabis Cultivation, Processing, Testing, Distribution, Transportation, Delivery and Dispensing be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4525, "fingerprint": "2016|201600052|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600052|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "20d0bf53c8564728", "measure_id": "201600052", "measure_letter": "AG", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative of the people of the County of Mendocino to add a temporary half-cent sales tax to fund facilities in Mendocino County to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health and drug dependence be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24190, "no_votes": 12342, "total_votes": 36532, "percent_yes": 66.21592028906164, "percent_no": 33.78407971093836, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.341878", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.730431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative of the people of the County of Mendocino to add a temporary half-cent sales tax to fund facilities in Mendocino County to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health and drug dependence be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4529, "fingerprint": "2016|201600056|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600056|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "3d74b57d74530e71", "measure_id": "201600056", "measure_letter": "AH", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted containing specific enactment language that will allow for the collection of taxes pursuant to the initiative to add a temporary half-cent sales tax to fund facilities in Mendocino County to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health and drug dependency, if said initiative is passed by the voters at the November 8, 2016 election, without which, no taxes will be collected pursuant to said initiative?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22958, "no_votes": 12941, "total_votes": 35899, "percent_yes": 63.95164210702248, "percent_no": 36.04835789297752, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.343046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.731172", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted containing specific enactment language that will allow for the collection of taxes pursuant to the initiative to add a temporary half-cent sales tax to fund facilities in Mendocino County to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health and drug dependency, if said initiative is passed by the voters at the November 8, 2016 election, without which, no taxes will be collected pursuant to said initiative?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4526, "fingerprint": "2016|201600053|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600053|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "ea462f16b87c73d2", "measure_id": "201600053", "measure_letter": "AI", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Chapter 6.32 be added to the Mendocino County Code, placing a business tax on cannabis cultivation and dispensaries (not to exceed 10% of gross receipts) and cannabis distribution, delivery, manufacturing, nurseries, testing laboratories and transportation businesses ($2,500.00 per year, to be adjusted in accordance with consumer price index increases) of medical and nonmedical cannabis where legalized by state law, potentially generating millions of dollars annually to help fund county services be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22375, "no_votes": 13121, "total_votes": 35496, "percent_yes": 63.035271579896325, "percent_no": 36.964728420103675, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.342167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.730615", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 6.32 be added to the Mendocino County Code, placing a business tax on cannabis cultivation and dispensaries (not to exceed 10% of gross receipts) and cannabis distribution, delivery, manufacturing, nurseries, testing laboratories and transportation businesses ($2,500.00 per year, to be adjusted in accordance with consumer price index increases) of medical and nonmedical cannabis where legalized by state law, potentially generating millions of dollars annually to help fund county services be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4527, "fingerprint": "2016|201600054|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600054|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "375e868b57f87af1", "measure_id": "201600054", "measure_letter": "AJ", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Mendocino County adopts business license taxes on cannabis businesses by the adoption of the measure adopting Chapter 6.32, Measure AI, should the County use a majority of that revenue for funding enforcement of marijuana regulations, enhanced mental health services, repair of county roads, and increase fire and emergency medical services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23971, "no_votes": 11004, "total_votes": 34975, "percent_yes": 68.53752680486062, "percent_no": 31.46247319513938, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.342454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.730800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Mendocino County adopts business license taxes on cannabis businesses by the adoption of the measure adopting Chapter 6.32, Measure AI, should the County use a majority of that revenue for funding enforcement of marijuana regulations, enhanced mental health services, repair of county roads, and increase fire and emergency medical services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4530, "fingerprint": "2016|201600296|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600296|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "1d3e5484449b8e84", "measure_id": "201600296", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Chapter 18.22 of the Municipal Code of the City of Fort Bragg be amended to provide that a social service organization is a prohibited use within the Central Business District unless such organization was established at a location within the district prior to January 1, 2015?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 961, "no_votes": 1172, "total_votes": 2133, "percent_yes": 45.05391467416784, "percent_no": 54.94608532583216, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.343332", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.731357", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Chapter 18.22 of the Municipal Code of the City of Fort Bragg be amended to provide that a social service organization is a prohibited use within the Central Business District unless such organization was established at a location within the district prior to January 1, 2015?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4524, "fingerprint": "2016|201600051|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600051|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "425dfa098b0ae5a1", "measure_id": "201600051", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the people of Mendocino county declare intentionally killed and left standing trees a public nuisance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16300, "no_votes": 9870, "total_votes": 26170, "percent_yes": 62.28505922812381, "percent_no": 37.71494077187619, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.341458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.730167", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of Mendocino county declare intentionally killed and left standing trees a public nuisance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4523, "fingerprint": "2016|201600050|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600050|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "880f999b26f291f9", "measure_id": "201600050", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall a charter commission be elected to propose a Mendocino County charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11368, "no_votes": 13135, "total_votes": 24503, "percent_yes": 46.39431906297188, "percent_no": 53.60568093702812, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.341170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.729986", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall a charter commission be elected to propose a Mendocino County charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4534, "fingerprint": "2016|201600300|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600300|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "17cdfeefd0d9b774", "measure_id": "201600300", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1165 be adopted to impose as a general tax and additional transaction (sales) and use tax of one-half percent within the city limits of the City of Ukiah to fund essential City services, including street repair and maintenance? Such tax increase is estimated to raise $2,470,000 annually at a rate of .5%. The duration of the tax will continue unless or until the tax is repealed by majority vote in a municipal election", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2905, "no_votes": 2736, "total_votes": 5641, "percent_yes": 51.49796135436979, "percent_no": 48.50203864563021, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.344650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.732087", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1165 be adopted to impose as a general tax and additional transaction (sales) and use tax of one-half percent within the city limits of the City of Ukiah to fund essential City services, including street repair and maintenance? Such tax increase is estimated to raise $2,470,000 annually at a rate of .5%. The duration of the tax will continue unless or until the tax is repealed by majority vote in a municipal election", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4537, "fingerprint": "2016|201600303|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600303|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "5f9c061b85d2c2e7", "measure_id": "201600303", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should street repair and maintenance and related public infrastructure improvements be the exclusive use of the revenues from an additional .5% sales tax in the City of Ukiah and add to and not replace current spending for street maintenance and repair?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3552, "no_votes": 1926, "total_votes": 5478, "percent_yes": 64.84118291347207, "percent_no": 35.15881708652793, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.345593", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.732637", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should street repair and maintenance and related public infrastructure improvements be the exclusive use of the revenues from an additional .5% sales tax in the City of Ukiah and add to and not replace current spending for street maintenance and repair?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4540, "fingerprint": "2016|201600688|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600688|MERCED", "content_hash": "4b3d633357d07afd", "measure_id": "201600688", "measure_letter": "7", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall John Mueller be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Los Banos Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 182, "no_votes": 169, "total_votes": 351, "percent_yes": 51.85185185185185, "percent_no": 48.14814814814815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-08-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.346563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.733198", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall John Mueller be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Los Banos Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4542, "fingerprint": "2016|201600690|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600690|MERCED", "content_hash": "9eb6dbce131ef409", "measure_id": "201600690", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade and repair elementary schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Turlock Unified School District provide new classrooms/instructional technology, including necessary infrastructure, for core academics including math, science, reading/writing; modernize classrooms to meet health/safety codes; improve campus safety/security; repair, construct, acquire, equip, classrooms, sites, facilities; by issuing $40,800,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used for Turlock Schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 142, "no_votes": 88, "total_votes": 230, "percent_yes": 61.73913043478261, "percent_no": 38.26086956521739, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.347219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.733571", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and repair elementary schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Turlock Unified School District provide new classrooms/instructional technology, including necessary infrastructure, for core academics including math, science, reading/writing; modernize classrooms to meet health/safety codes; improve campus safety/security; repair, construct, acquire, equip, classrooms, sites, facilities; by issuing $40,800,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used for Turlock Schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4543, "fingerprint": "2016|201600691|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600691|MERCED", "content_hash": "a6f30f75fbbe495c", "measure_id": "201600691", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade and repair high schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Turlock Unified School District provide science, technology/engineering labs; provide new classrooms/instructional technology, including necessary infrastructure, for core academics; modernize facilities to meet health/safety codes; improve campus safety/security; repair, construct, acquire, equip, classrooms, sites, facilities; by issuing $48,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used for Turlock Schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140, "no_votes": 92, "total_votes": 232, "percent_yes": 60.3448275862069, "percent_no": 39.6551724137931, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.347506", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.733755", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and repair high schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Turlock Unified School District provide science, technology/engineering labs; provide new classrooms/instructional technology, including necessary infrastructure, for core academics; modernize facilities to meet health/safety codes; improve campus safety/security; repair, construct, acquire, equip, classrooms, sites, facilities; by issuing $48,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used for Turlock Schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4539, "fingerprint": "2016|201600687|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600687|MERCED", "content_hash": "7da13ac9a6c7bd7c", "measure_id": "201600687", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall the Ballico-Cressey School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and NO money used for administrator or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 260, "no_votes": 164, "total_votes": 424, "percent_yes": 61.32075471698113, "percent_no": 38.67924528301887, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.346197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.733010", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall the Ballico-Cressey School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and NO money used for administrator or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4538, "fingerprint": "2016|201600057|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600057|MERCED", "content_hash": "455e9327953f878f", "measure_id": "201600057", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide funding for local transportation improvements including fixing potholes and maintaining local roads; reducing traffic congestion on highways and local roads; providing seniors, disabled and veterans with mobility options; improving pedestrian and bike travel; shall the Merced County Transportation Authority enact a 1\u20442 cent sales tax, providing $15 million dollars annually for transportation projects for 30 years, that cannot be taken by the State, with citizens' oversight, and requiring all money to be spent entirely in Merced County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48996, "no_votes": 19771, "total_votes": 68767, "percent_yes": 71.2492910843864, "percent_no": 28.7507089156136, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.345895", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.732818", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for local transportation improvements including fixing potholes and maintaining local roads; reducing traffic congestion on highways and local roads; providing seniors, disabled and veterans with mobility options; improving pedestrian and bike travel; shall the Merced County Transportation Authority enact a 1\u20442 cent sales tax, providing $15 million dollars annually for transportation projects for 30 years, that cannot be taken by the State, with citizens' oversight, and requiring all money to be spent entirely in Merced County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4541, "fingerprint": "2016|201600689|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600689|MERCED", "content_hash": "59c2deeee2103d16", "measure_id": "201600689", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Delhi schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; construct a new Vocational/Ag building; and improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Delhi Unified School District issue $12,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1914, "no_votes": 664, "total_votes": 2578, "percent_yes": 74.24359968968193, "percent_no": 25.75640031031807, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.346856", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.733379", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Delhi schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; construct a new Vocational/Ag building; and improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Delhi Unified School District issue $12,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4545, "fingerprint": "2016|201600059|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600059|MODOC", "content_hash": "c4502e8bc8aad405", "measure_id": "201600059", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on December 14th, 2015 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Lassen ordering the formation of a District in the territory described, known as the Southern Cascades Community Services District, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 211, "no_votes": 100, "total_votes": 311, "percent_yes": 67.84565916398714, "percent_no": 32.154340836012864, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.348148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.734124", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on December 14th, 2015 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Lassen ordering the formation of a District in the territory described, known as the Southern Cascades Community Services District, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4544, "fingerprint": "2016|201600058|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600058|MODOC", "content_hash": "76597060cbd0b117", "measure_id": "201600058", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted to assess a special tax of $65 per annum per parcel regardless of the size for up to two parcels owned by each unique landowner regardless of which county the parcels are located, the special tax will be authorized only if the Southern Cascades Community Services District is formed and is collected in the same manner as taxes on real property , commencing in the fiscal year after which the voters have authorized the special tax, with the revenue to be used for local ambulance, emergency medical response and training, and any lawful purpose of the Southern Cascades Community Services District? (NOTE: Passage of a special tax shall be required for the district to be formed.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 207, "no_votes": 105, "total_votes": 312, "percent_yes": 66.34615384615384, "percent_no": 33.65384615384616, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.347797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.733941", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted to assess a special tax of $65 per annum per parcel regardless of the size for up to two parcels owned by each unique landowner regardless of which county the parcels are located, the special tax will be authorized only if the Southern Cascades Community Services District is formed and is collected in the same manner as taxes on real property , commencing in the fiscal year after which the voters have authorized the special tax, with the revenue to be used for local ambulance, emergency medical response and training, and any lawful purpose of the Southern Cascades Community Services District? (NOTE: Passage of a special tax shall be required for the district to be formed.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4546, "fingerprint": "2016|201600304|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600304|MODOC", "content_hash": "13c80eb6cd0e2073", "measure_id": "201600304", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a Business Tax at a rate of 10% of gross receipts on Marijuana Collectives and Cooperatives operating in the City of Alturas?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 495, "no_votes": 116, "total_votes": 611, "percent_yes": 81.01472995090016, "percent_no": 18.98527004909984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.348439", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.734305", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a Business Tax at a rate of 10% of gross receipts on Marijuana Collectives and Cooperatives operating in the City of Alturas?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4547, "fingerprint": "2016|201600692|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600692|MODOC", "content_hash": "9bbc47a38d981eb9", "measure_id": "201600692", "measure_letter": "H/J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27, "no_votes": 25, "total_votes": 52, "percent_yes": 51.92307692307693, "percent_no": 48.07692307692307, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.348741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.734492", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4548, "fingerprint": "2016|201600693|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600693|MONO", "content_hash": "f351b73fd18579c7", "measure_id": "201600693", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain adequate funding and high quality academic programs for all Mammoth Unified schools for the purpose of preserving smaller classes, attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers, strengthening core curriculum, and enhancing technology, art, music, math, science and athletics, shall Mammoth Unified School District extend the current $59 annual education parcel tax for five years with exemptions for senior citizens' primary residences and overseen by an independent citizen's oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1663, "no_votes": 425, "total_votes": 2088, "percent_yes": 79.6455938697318, "percent_no": 20.354406130268202, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.349038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.734684", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain adequate funding and high quality academic programs for all Mammoth Unified schools for the purpose of preserving smaller classes, attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers, strengthening core curriculum, and enhancing technology, art, music, math, science and athletics, shall Mammoth Unified School District extend the current $59 annual education parcel tax for five years with exemptions for senior citizens' primary residences and overseen by an independent citizen's oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11280, "fingerprint": "2016|201600695|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600695|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "26aa5cfae45f06c8", "measure_id": "201600695", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/renovate classrooms and school facilities and improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall San Antonio Union School District construct new school/support facilities, upgrade existing infrastructure, improve student access to computers and modern technology, enhance safety/security, upgrade/replace outdated utility systems, acquire, construct, repair classrooms and facilities/equipment by issuing $2,100,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 295, "no_votes": 170, "total_votes": 465, "percent_yes": 63.44086021505376, "percent_no": 36.55913978494624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.747358", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.356024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.738752", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/renovate classrooms and school facilities and improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall San Antonio Union School District construct new school/support facilities, upgrade existing infrastructure, improve student access to computers and modern technology, enhance safety/security, upgrade/replace outdated utility systems, acquire, construct, repair classrooms and facilities/equipment by issuing $2,100,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4554, "fingerprint": "2016|201600308|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600308|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "45b772e5361eb79e", "measure_id": "201600308", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect the quality of life in the City of Del Rey Oaks and to fund essential city services such as police and fire, city programs, basic infrastructure and facilities, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax of no more than 10% (5% when enacted) on gross receipts of cannabis (marijuana) businesses in the city, subject to audits, with anticipated revenue of $250,000, no termination date and with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 736, "no_votes": 183, "total_votes": 919, "percent_yes": 80.08705114254624, "percent_no": 19.912948857453756, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.351216", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.735982", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of life in the City of Del Rey Oaks and to fund essential city services such as police and fire, city programs, basic infrastructure and facilities, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax of no more than 10% (5% when enacted) on gross receipts of cannabis (marijuana) businesses in the city, subject to audits, with anticipated revenue of $250,000, no termination date and with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11279, "fingerprint": "2016|201600309|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600309|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7640f0e7ad910be0", "measure_id": "201600309", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an existing sales tax rate of one percent (1%), be extended for a period of not more than five (5) years, unless terminated sooner by the City Council, be adopted by the City of Del Rey Oaks, the proceeds of said tax to be utilized for general governmental purposes? The anticipated revenue of $300,000 annually is essential in continuing standard city services.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 592, "no_votes": 321, "total_votes": 913, "percent_yes": 64.84118291347207, "percent_no": 35.15881708652793, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.744704", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.351585", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.736162", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an existing sales tax rate of one percent (1%), be extended for a period of not more than five (5) years, unless terminated sooner by the City Council, be adopted by the City of Del Rey Oaks, the proceeds of said tax to be utilized for general governmental purposes? The anticipated revenue of $300,000 annually is essential in continuing standard city services.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4552, "fingerprint": "2016|201600306|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600306|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f214d220976f9597", "measure_id": "201600306", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Salinas City Charter be amended to: 1) repeal requirements to competitively bid the construction of public improvements valued above $50,000 and obtain two-thirds prior voter approval for the establishment of certain utilities, thereby empowering the City Council to regulate such matters; and 2) update and reorganize the Charter to delete obsolete provisions, resolve contradictions, conform to current law and make it more user friendly?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12081, "no_votes": 9768, "total_votes": 21849, "percent_yes": 55.29314842784567, "percent_no": 44.70685157215433, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.350621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.735615", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Salinas City Charter be amended to: 1) repeal requirements to competitively bid the construction of public improvements valued above $50,000 and obtain two-thirds prior voter approval for the establishment of certain utilities, thereby empowering the City Council to regulate such matters; and 2) update and reorganize the Charter to delete obsolete provisions, resolve contradictions, conform to current law and make it more user friendly?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4553, "fingerprint": "2016|201600307|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600307|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "df34a0c4ab6b39f3", "measure_id": "201600307", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City of Salinas adopt an ordinance allowing for the possession, use, storage, sale and display of fireworks; imposing social host liability associated with the possession and use of fireworks; and requiring Public Safety Operation Plans and After Action Reports?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13096, "no_votes": 9349, "total_votes": 22445, "percent_yes": 58.347070617063935, "percent_no": 41.652929382936065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.350925", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.735800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City of Salinas adopt an ordinance allowing for the possession, use, storage, sale and display of fireworks; imposing social host liability associated with the possession and use of fireworks; and requiring Public Safety Operation Plans and After Action Reports?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4571, "fingerprint": "2016|201600700|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600700|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "0823124bc754ef04", "measure_id": "201600700", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, improve and equip Lillian Larsen and Cappy Culver Schools including new classrooms for technology, science and vocational training, security fencing for improved student safety, and upgraded heating/air conditioning systems, shall San Miguel Joint Union School District be authorized to issue $5.9 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 17, "percent_yes": 64.70588235294117, "percent_no": 35.294117647058826, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.357305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.739611", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, improve and equip Lillian Larsen and Cappy Culver Schools including new classrooms for technology, science and vocational training, security fencing for improved student safety, and upgraded heating/air conditioning systems, shall San Miguel Joint Union School District be authorized to issue $5.9 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4563, "fingerprint": "2016|201600318|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600318|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "372af80abb16d2a2", "measure_id": "201600318", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 3.16.020 of Chapter 3.16 of the Soledad Municipal Code be amended to increase the existing transient occupancy tax, charged only to occupants of City hotels, from nine percent (9%) to twelve percent (12%), increasing the tax collected by an estimated $20,000 for a new estimated annual total of $100,000, with no termination date, to continue to provide funding for essential services such as police, fire, street repair, park maintenance and community programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2226, "no_votes": 1397, "total_votes": 3623, "percent_yes": 61.44079492133591, "percent_no": 38.55920507866409, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.354425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.737829", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 3.16.020 of Chapter 3.16 of the Soledad Municipal Code be amended to increase the existing transient occupancy tax, charged only to occupants of City hotels, from nine percent (9%) to twelve percent (12%), increasing the tax collected by an estimated $20,000 for a new estimated annual total of $100,000, with no termination date, to continue to provide funding for essential services such as police, fire, street repair, park maintenance and community programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4559, "fingerprint": "2016|201600314|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600314|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "479e3e1c49d3cf84", "measure_id": "201600314", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To modernize the City\u2019s existing 5% telephone users tax for non-residential users, and existing 2% rate for residential users, and to maintain funding for such essential City services as police, fire, streets, libraries and parks, shall the tax be extended to include wireless, internet, and other modern telecommunications without increasing the tax rate to raise approximately $560,000 per year for City services on an ongoing basis?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6201, "no_votes": 4843, "total_votes": 11044, "percent_yes": 56.1481347337921, "percent_no": 43.8518652662079, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.353179", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.737087", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize the City\u2019s existing 5% telephone users tax for non-residential users, and existing 2% rate for residential users, and to maintain funding for such essential City services as police, fire, streets, libraries and parks, shall the tax be extended to include wireless, internet, and other modern telecommunications without increasing the tax rate to raise approximately $560,000 per year for City services on an ongoing basis?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4560, "fingerprint": "2016|201600315|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600315|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f9c296172062ea62", "measure_id": "201600315", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To simplify the City\u2019s existing business license tax and to fund essential City services such as police, fire, streets, libraries, and parks at current levels, shall the City amend the tax to assess rates equally amongst businesses regardless of function, imposing a minimum tax per business of $26 per year plus 0.15% of gross receipts over $25,000, thereby maintaining current annual revenues of approximately $3.2 million on an ongoing basis?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8202, "no_votes": 2903, "total_votes": 11105, "percent_yes": 73.85862224223322, "percent_no": 26.141377757766776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.353487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.737274", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To simplify the City\u2019s existing business license tax and to fund essential City services such as police, fire, streets, libraries, and parks at current levels, shall the City amend the tax to assess rates equally amongst businesses regardless of function, imposing a minimum tax per business of $26 per year plus 0.15% of gross receipts over $25,000, thereby maintaining current annual revenues of approximately $3.2 million on an ongoing basis?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4565, "fingerprint": "2016|201600320|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600320|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7e9be345baef1668", "measure_id": "201600320", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Monterey Charter be amended to: (1) disavow application of the California Public Contracts Code, (2) repeal requirements to competitively bid the construction of public improvements valued at $65,000 or more, and (3) delete provisions relating to emergency purchases and job order contracts, thereby allowing the City Council to regulate such matters by ordinance and streamlining purchasing and procurement activities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6495, "no_votes": 4086, "total_votes": 10581, "percent_yes": 61.38361213495889, "percent_no": 38.61638786504111, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.355077", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.738197", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Monterey Charter be amended to: (1) disavow application of the California Public Contracts Code, (2) repeal requirements to competitively bid the construction of public improvements valued at $65,000 or more, and (3) delete provisions relating to emergency purchases and job order contracts, thereby allowing the City Council to regulate such matters by ordinance and streamlining purchasing and procurement activities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4557, "fingerprint": "2016|201600312|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600312|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "8d57c727786a2cb7", "measure_id": "201600312", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a City of King Ordinance be adopted to tax lawful medical and nonmedical marijuana businesses at $25.00 per square foot for the first 5,000 square feet and $10.00 per square foot thereafter for cultivation; not to exceed $5.00 per square foot for nurseries; $30,000.00 each for manufacturing and testing facilities; and may be adjusted annually by CPI; which is estimated to generate $1 million to $2 million annually to fund City of King services with no termination date?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1678, "no_votes": 439, "total_votes": 2117, "percent_yes": 79.26310817194143, "percent_no": 20.736891828058575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.352469", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.736721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a City of King Ordinance be adopted to tax lawful medical and nonmedical marijuana businesses at $25.00 per square foot for the first 5,000 square feet and $10.00 per square foot thereafter for cultivation; not to exceed $5.00 per square foot for nurseries; $30,000.00 each for manufacturing and testing facilities; and may be adjusted annually by CPI; which is estimated to generate $1 million to $2 million annually to fund City of King services with no termination date?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4572, "fingerprint": "2016|201600701|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600701|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "0d5e459b10fa99c3", "measure_id": "201600701", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair leaky pipes, deteriorating septic systems, aging roofs and inefficient heating/air-conditioning; upgrade portable classrooms; install emergency communication systems and remove asbestos; and qualify for State matching funds at Shandon Elementary, Parkfield Elementary and Shandon High Schools; shall Shandon Joint Unified School District issue $3.15 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45, "no_votes": 26, "total_votes": 71, "percent_yes": 63.38028169014085, "percent_no": 36.61971830985915, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.357622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.739861", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair leaky pipes, deteriorating septic systems, aging roofs and inefficient heating/air-conditioning; upgrade portable classrooms; install emergency communication systems and remove asbestos; and qualify for State matching funds at Shandon Elementary, Parkfield Elementary and Shandon High Schools; shall Shandon Joint Unified School District issue $3.15 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4562, "fingerprint": "2016|201600317|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600317|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b3df2318d77edb29", "measure_id": "201600317", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance imposing a tax on commercial cannabis businesses for medical and nonmedical marijuana where permissible by state and local law be adopted with the tax on cultivation activities not to exceed $25.00 per square foot and adjusted annually by a CPI and the tax rate on dispensaries, manufacturing, and delivery not to exceed 10% of annual gross receipts, potentially generating $1-$2 million dollars annually to help fund City services with no termination date?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27454, "no_votes": 9557, "total_votes": 37011, "percent_yes": 74.17794709680906, "percent_no": 25.822052903190936, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.354137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.737647", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance imposing a tax on commercial cannabis businesses for medical and nonmedical marijuana where permissible by state and local law be adopted with the tax on cultivation activities not to exceed $25.00 per square foot and adjusted annually by a CPI and the tax rate on dispensaries, manufacturing, and delivery not to exceed 10% of annual gross receipts, potentially generating $1-$2 million dollars annually to help fund City services with no termination date?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4568, "fingerprint": "2016|201600696|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600696|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "8d72626b122d5066", "measure_id": "201600696", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/modernize neighborhood school classrooms, facilities, and technology infrastructure supporting programs in reading, math, science and arts; improve disabled student access; repair/replace fire safety, plumbing and electrical systems; with funding that cannot be taken by the State; shall Alisal Union School District rebuild Fremont Elementary School and Alisal Community School and construct one new elementary school to relieve overcrowding and improve student learning; by issuing $70 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, and no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8034, "no_votes": 2939, "total_votes": 10973, "percent_yes": 73.21607582247334, "percent_no": 26.783924177526657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.356324", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.738939", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/modernize neighborhood school classrooms, facilities, and technology infrastructure supporting programs in reading, math, science and arts; improve disabled student access; repair/replace fire safety, plumbing and electrical systems; with funding that cannot be taken by the State; shall Alisal Union School District rebuild Fremont Elementary School and Alisal Community School and construct one new elementary school to relieve overcrowding and improve student learning; by issuing $70 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, and no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4570, "fingerprint": "2016|201600699|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600699|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f8fd6411d0047f79", "measure_id": "201600699", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, upgrade, construct and rebuild aging classrooms and school facilities including deteriorating electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems; renovate restrooms; upgrade fire alarms; and install wiring to support modern technology, shall San Ardo Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $6.8 million of bonds with rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, financial audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds spent on San Ardo School and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 111, "no_votes": 39, "total_votes": 150, "percent_yes": 74.0, "percent_no": 26.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.357007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.739309", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, upgrade, construct and rebuild aging classrooms and school facilities including deteriorating electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems; renovate restrooms; upgrade fire alarms; and install wiring to support modern technology, shall San Ardo Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $6.8 million of bonds with rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, financial audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds spent on San Ardo School and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4556, "fingerprint": "2016|201600311|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600311|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c206b79f63234f58", "measure_id": "201600311", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Greenfield Municipal Code be amended to add a \u201cCannabis Business Tax\u201d on cultivation, dispensaries, deliveries, distribution, manufacturing, nurseries, testing, and transportation of medical and nonmedical marijuana where legalized by state law; the cultivation tax shall not exceed ($25.00) per square foot; a CPI may be adjusted annually; all other cannabis activities shall be taxed at a rate not to exceed (10%); generating an estimated $2 million annually with no termination date?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1977, "no_votes": 1024, "total_votes": 3001, "percent_yes": 65.87804065311563, "percent_no": 34.12195934688437, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.352182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.736533", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Greenfield Municipal Code be amended to add a \u201cCannabis Business Tax\u201d on cultivation, dispensaries, deliveries, distribution, manufacturing, nurseries, testing, and transportation of medical and nonmedical marijuana where legalized by state law; the cultivation tax shall not exceed ($25.00) per square foot; a CPI may be adjusted annually; all other cannabis activities shall be taxed at a rate not to exceed (10%); generating an estimated $2 million annually with no termination date?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4561, "fingerprint": "2016|201600316|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600316|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "0480b6d8473bd98a", "measure_id": "201600316", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 6.13 be added to the Pacific Grove Municipal Code to impose a five percent (5%) admission tax to enter or attend events or facilities within the City of Pacific Grove, including but not limited to attendance at an aquarium, sporting or athletic events, concerts, golf courses, marathons, motion pictures, museums, or organized activities, in accord with Resolution No. 16-045, which Chapter shall not sunset and shall have an annual yield approximating $4 million?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1845, "no_votes": 6209, "total_votes": 8054, "percent_yes": 22.90787186491184, "percent_no": 77.09212813508816, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.353850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.737466", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 6.13 be added to the Pacific Grove Municipal Code to impose a five percent (5%) admission tax to enter or attend events or facilities within the City of Pacific Grove, including but not limited to attendance at an aquarium, sporting or athletic events, concerts, golf courses, marathons, motion pictures, museums, or organized activities, in accord with Resolution No. 16-045, which Chapter shall not sunset and shall have an annual yield approximating $4 million?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4567, "fingerprint": "2016|201600694|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600694|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "09978748a3ffca6b", "measure_id": "201600694", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by upgrading aging classrooms, technology/science labs, repairing outdated, deteriorating wiring, sewer lines, improving campus safety, handicapped accessibility, increasing water conservation/energy efficiency, and acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no funding administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, requiring independent audits, and all funds used locally?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1289, "no_votes": 1104, "total_votes": 2393, "percent_yes": 53.86544086920184, "percent_no": 46.13455913079816, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.355724", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.738564", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by upgrading aging classrooms, technology/science labs, repairing outdated, deteriorating wiring, sewer lines, improving campus safety, handicapped accessibility, increasing water conservation/energy efficiency, and acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no funding administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, requiring independent audits, and all funds used locally?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4566, "fingerprint": "2016|201600697|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600697|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "2c645202bcad8452", "measure_id": "201600697", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; construct, renovate, and upgrade classrooms and school buildings; provide facilities for job training/career technical education; replace deteriorating plumbing and outdated HVAC systems; repair/replace leaky roofs; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Coalinga-Huron Joint Unified School District issue $39,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 6, "percent_yes": 83.33333333333334, "percent_no": 16.666666666666657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.355425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.738378", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; construct, renovate, and upgrade classrooms and school buildings; provide facilities for job training/career technical education; replace deteriorating plumbing and outdated HVAC systems; repair/replace leaky roofs; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Coalinga-Huron Joint Unified School District issue $39,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4569, "fingerprint": "2016|201600698|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600698|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "ee4f1cbabe109627", "measure_id": "201600698", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade classrooms, expand local access to higher education/ training for high-wage jobs, including nursing, agriculture, science, technology/ engineering, by upgrading aging classrooms, technology, science labs, repairing outdated, deteriorating mechanical/electrical systems, improving veterans\u2019 services, safety, security/ disabled access, removing asbestos, acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Hartnell Community College District issue $167,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49353, "no_votes": 22416, "total_votes": 71769, "percent_yes": 68.76645905613844, "percent_no": 31.233540943861556, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.356629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.739120", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade classrooms, expand local access to higher education/ training for high-wage jobs, including nursing, agriculture, science, technology/ engineering, by upgrading aging classrooms, technology, science labs, repairing outdated, deteriorating mechanical/electrical systems, improving veterans\u2019 services, safety, security/ disabled access, removing asbestos, acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Hartnell Community College District issue $167,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4558, "fingerprint": "2016|201600313|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600313|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "041a8d0904587b59", "measure_id": "201600313", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide general city services such as: street and facility maintenance and fire, police, youth and senior services; shall the City of Marina update its 38 year old business license tax rates to 0.2% of gross receipts, so small businesses pay lower amounts than larger businesses; generating approximately $900,000 annually; continuing until ended by voters or reduced by City Council; and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5885, "no_votes": 1213, "total_votes": 7098, "percent_yes": 82.91067906452521, "percent_no": 17.089320935474788, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.352872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.736906", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide general city services such as: street and facility maintenance and fire, police, youth and senior services; shall the City of Marina update its 38 year old business license tax rates to 0.2% of gross receipts, so small businesses pay lower amounts than larger businesses; generating approximately $900,000 annually; continuing until ended by voters or reduced by City Council; and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4564, "fingerprint": "2016|201600319|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600319|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "67ab1963e852d413", "measure_id": "201600319", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1.04 be added to the Charter to provide for the direct election of the mayor to serve a term of four years, commencing with the 2018 general municipal election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4056, "no_votes": 2840, "total_votes": 6896, "percent_yes": 58.816705336426914, "percent_no": 41.183294663573086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.354731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.738011", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1.04 be added to the Charter to provide for the direct election of the mayor to serve a term of four years, commencing with the 2018 general municipal election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4555, "fingerprint": "2016|201600310|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600310|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c60dc59501d8635b", "measure_id": "201600310", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Gonzales Municipal Code be amended to add a \u201cCommercial Cannabis Tax\u201d on cultivation and manufacturing of medical marijuana where permissible by state and local law? The cultivation tax will not exceed $25 per square foot subject to increases after the third year based on the consumer price index, while the manufacturing tax shall not exceed 15% of annual gross receipts, both with no termination date, generating estimated revenues of $1,365,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1439, "no_votes": 547, "total_votes": 1986, "percent_yes": 72.45720040281974, "percent_no": 27.542799597180263, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.351889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.736343", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Gonzales Municipal Code be amended to add a \u201cCommercial Cannabis Tax\u201d on cultivation and manufacturing of medical marijuana where permissible by state and local law? The cultivation tax will not exceed $25 per square foot subject to increases after the third year based on the consumer price index, while the manufacturing tax shall not exceed 15% of annual gross receipts, both with no termination date, generating estimated revenues of $1,365,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11278, "fingerprint": "2016|201600305|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600305|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "02bed04bb4dde69f", "measure_id": "201600305", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Pacific Grove Municipal Code be amended to add Section 23.31.025 to change the zoning designation at the American Tin Cannery Site, located in Pacific Grove on Assessor Parcels (APN) 006-231-001, 006-234-004, 006-234-005, and the portion of Sloat Street between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Street, from Visitor Commercial (C-V) and Heavy Commercial (C-2) to Visitor Commercial (C-V-ATC) to reestablish hotels as a permissible land use?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3016, "no_votes": 2111, "total_votes": 5127, "percent_yes": 58.82582406865613, "percent_no": 41.17417593134387, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-19", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.743955", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.350268", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.735432", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Pacific Grove Municipal Code be amended to add Section 23.31.025 to change the zoning designation at the American Tin Cannery Site, located in Pacific Grove on Assessor Parcels (APN) 006-231-001, 006-234-004, 006-234-005, and the portion of Sloat Street between Eardley Avenue and Dewey Street, from Visitor Commercial (C-V) and Heavy Commercial (C-2) to Visitor Commercial (C-V-ATC) to reestablish hotels as a permissible land use?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4549, "fingerprint": "2016|201600060|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600060|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b69e97a1f3fde59d", "measure_id": "201600060", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Transportation Agency for Monterey County fund a transportation safety and investment plan to: improve safety on local roads and highways; repair potholes; maintain streets and roads; reduce traffic congestion; improve transportation for seniors, young people, and people with disabilities; and make walking and biking safer, by enacting a three-eighths\u2019 percent sales tax, raising approximately twenty million dollars annually over 30 years, plus state and federal matching funds, with citizen oversight and annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 87915, "no_votes": 41924, "total_votes": 129839, "percent_yes": 67.71078027403169, "percent_no": 32.28921972596831, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.349333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.734866", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Transportation Agency for Monterey County fund a transportation safety and investment plan to: improve safety on local roads and highways; repair potholes; maintain streets and roads; reduce traffic congestion; improve transportation for seniors, young people, and people with disabilities; and make walking and biking safer, by enacting a three-eighths\u2019 percent sales tax, raising approximately twenty million dollars annually over 30 years, plus state and federal matching funds, with citizen oversight and annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4550, "fingerprint": "2016|201600061|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600061|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c389f63753c01968", "measure_id": "201600061", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance imposing a tax on commercial marijuana businesses in the unincorporated area of Monterey County only (not cities) up to a maximum of: $25 per square foot on cultivation with an annual adjustment by Consumer Price Index (CPI) thereafter; $5 per square foot on nurseries with annual CPI adjustment thereafter; and 10% of gross receipts on other marijuana business activities with no CPI, potentially generating millions of dollars annually to help fund County services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95978, "no_votes": 34288, "total_votes": 130266, "percent_yes": 73.67847327775475, "percent_no": 26.321526722245252, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.349681", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.735056", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance imposing a tax on commercial marijuana businesses in the unincorporated area of Monterey County only (not cities) up to a maximum of: $25 per square foot on cultivation with an annual adjustment by Consumer Price Index (CPI) thereafter; $5 per square foot on nurseries with annual CPI adjustment thereafter; and 10% of gross receipts on other marijuana business activities with no CPI, potentially generating millions of dollars annually to help fund County services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4551, "fingerprint": "2016|201600062|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600062|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "89eb82afd8cec18f", "measure_id": "201600062", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative amending the Monterey County General Plan, Local Coastal Program, and Fort Ord Master Plan to: (1) prohibit the use of land within the County\u2019s unincorporated (non-city) areas for hydraulic fracturing treatments (\u201cfracking\u201d), acid well stimulation treatments, and other well stimulation treatments; (2) prohibit new and phase out existing land uses that utilize oil and gas wastewater injection and impoundment; and, (3) prohibit the drilling of new oil and gas wells in the County\u2019s unincorporated areas be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73877, "no_votes": 57883, "total_votes": 131760, "percent_yes": 56.06936854887674, "percent_no": 43.93063145112326, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.349979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.735241", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative amending the Monterey County General Plan, Local Coastal Program, and Fort Ord Master Plan to: (1) prohibit the use of land within the County\u2019s unincorporated (non-city) areas for hydraulic fracturing treatments (\u201cfracking\u201d), acid well stimulation treatments, and other well stimulation treatments; (2) prohibit new and phase out existing land uses that utilize oil and gas wastewater injection and impoundment; and, (3) prohibit the drilling of new oil and gas wells in the County\u2019s unincorporated areas be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11281, "fingerprint": "2016|201600704|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600704|NAPA", "content_hash": "9359f06b88fd4910", "measure_id": "201600704", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; and construct a multi-purpose room for school and community use; shall the Pope Valley Union School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 146, "no_votes": 101, "total_votes": 247, "percent_yes": 59.10931174089069, "percent_no": 40.89068825910931, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.749983", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.360660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.741569", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; and construct a multi-purpose room for school and community use; shall the Pope Valley Union School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4577, "fingerprint": "2016|201600067|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600067|NAPA", "content_hash": "1b1ee4b19306c7a2", "measure_id": "201600067", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 2016-04 be adopted? (Compromise ordinance requiring the Animal Shelter to do the following in a cost effective way: (i) prepare behavioral and medical evaluations for impounded or surrendered dogs, cats and rabbits before destruction, (ii) work with non-profit animal organizations, (iii) provide veterinary care, socialization, and exercise, and (v) publish a list of nonprofit animal organizations and a list of statistical release rates of dogs, cats, and rabbits.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39862, "no_votes": 16134, "total_votes": 55996, "percent_yes": 71.18722765911852, "percent_no": 28.81277234088148, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.359238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.740810", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 2016-04 be adopted? (Compromise ordinance requiring the Animal Shelter to do the following in a cost effective way: (i) prepare behavioral and medical evaluations for impounded or surrendered dogs, cats and rabbits before destruction, (ii) work with non-profit animal organizations, (iii) provide veterinary care, socialization, and exercise, and (v) publish a list of nonprofit animal organizations and a list of statistical release rates of dogs, cats, and rabbits.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4573, "fingerprint": "2016|201600064|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600064|NAPA", "content_hash": "c9ac6c8127701fb7", "measure_id": "201600064", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24598, "no_votes": 17000, "total_votes": 41598, "percent_yes": 59.13265060820232, "percent_no": 40.86734939179768, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.358007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.740057", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4576, "fingerprint": "2016|201600066|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600066|NAPA", "content_hash": "5e6a69b1142bcf54", "measure_id": "201600066", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 2016-03 be adopted? (Amends the Napa County Code requiring the Animal Shelter to (i) prepare behavioral and medical evaluations for impounded or surrendered dogs, cats and rabbits before destruction, (ii) work with non-profit animal organizations, (iii) provide veterinary care, socialization, and exercise using all resources available, and (v) publish a list of nonprofit animal organizations and a list of statistical release rates of dogs, cats, and rabbits.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26172, "no_votes": 28785, "total_votes": 54957, "percent_yes": 47.62268682788362, "percent_no": 52.37731317211638, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.358954", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.740618", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 2016-03 be adopted? (Amends the Napa County Code requiring the Animal Shelter to (i) prepare behavioral and medical evaluations for impounded or surrendered dogs, cats and rabbits before destruction, (ii) work with non-profit animal organizations, (iii) provide veterinary care, socialization, and exercise using all resources available, and (v) publish a list of nonprofit animal organizations and a list of statistical release rates of dogs, cats, and rabbits.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4578, "fingerprint": "2016|201600321|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600321|NAPA", "content_hash": "f8283f402c825040", "measure_id": "201600321", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund vital City services such as local street maintenance, 911 emergency medical, police and fire response, pedestrian/cyclist/traffic safety, park maintenance, library services, programs for youth and seniors, and to preserve the City's long-term financial stability and small town character, shall the City of St. Helena adopt a one half percent Transactions and Use Tax, generating approximately $1,400,000 annually with all revenues benefiting the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1868, "no_votes": 825, "total_votes": 2693, "percent_yes": 69.36502042331972, "percent_no": 30.63497957668028, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.359522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.740992", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund vital City services such as local street maintenance, 911 emergency medical, police and fire response, pedestrian/cyclist/traffic safety, park maintenance, library services, programs for youth and seniors, and to preserve the City's long-term financial stability and small town character, shall the City of St. Helena adopt a one half percent Transactions and Use Tax, generating approximately $1,400,000 annually with all revenues benefiting the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4580, "fingerprint": "2016|201600703|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600703|NAPA", "content_hash": "557906f63b69f4a9", "measure_id": "201600703", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To fix or replace earthquake damage, fire safety, plumbing/mechanical systems with funding that cannot be taken by the State, relocate or repair schools on earthquake faults, update aging electrical, plumbing, outdated heating/ventilation systems, provide flexible classrooms/labs for science and other core academics, update classrooms for vocational/career technology, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall Napa Valley Unified School District issue $269,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight/audits, no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19729, "no_votes": 15510, "total_votes": 35239, "percent_yes": 55.986265217514685, "percent_no": 44.013734782485315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.360366", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.741375", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fix or replace earthquake damage, fire safety, plumbing/mechanical systems with funding that cannot be taken by the State, relocate or repair schools on earthquake faults, update aging electrical, plumbing, outdated heating/ventilation systems, provide flexible classrooms/labs for science and other core academics, update classrooms for vocational/career technology, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall Napa Valley Unified School District issue $269,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight/audits, no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4579, "fingerprint": "2016|201600702|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600702|NAPA", "content_hash": "8d80cfec9d1fc4f9", "measure_id": "201600702", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, provide safe and modern schools for all students with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade, modernize and construct classrooms, science labs and libraries; improve student access to technology; repair leaky roofs, outdated electrical and plumbing systems; and improve safety, security and access for students with disabilities shall Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District issue $249,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens\u2019 oversight, audits and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44, "no_votes": 62, "total_votes": 106, "percent_yes": 41.50943396226415, "percent_no": 58.49056603773585, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.360038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.741176", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, provide safe and modern schools for all students with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade, modernize and construct classrooms, science labs and libraries; improve student access to technology; repair leaky roofs, outdated electrical and plumbing systems; and improve safety, security and access for students with disabilities shall Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District issue $249,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens\u2019 oversight, audits and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4574, "fingerprint": "2016|201600063|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600063|NAPA", "content_hash": "999347f4eabf8709", "measure_id": "201600063", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Transactions and Use Tax by .25% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18733, "no_votes": 22465, "total_votes": 41198, "percent_yes": 45.4706539152386, "percent_no": 54.5293460847614, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.358361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.740242", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Transactions and Use Tax by .25% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4575, "fingerprint": "2016|201600065|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600065|NAPA", "content_hash": "183f923b9450a54e", "measure_id": "201600065", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect drinking water by preserving and restoring watersheds, rivers, creeks; protect natural open spaces and wildlife habitat; reduce wildfire risk; and maintain parks and trails; shall Napa County enact a 1/4 percent sales tax for the Napa County Regional Park and Open Space District raising an estimated eight million dollars annually for fourteen years with citizen oversight, annual audits, and funds that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37670, "no_votes": 20552, "total_votes": 58222, "percent_yes": 64.70062862835354, "percent_no": 35.29937137164646, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.358666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.740432", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect drinking water by preserving and restoring watersheds, rivers, creeks; protect natural open spaces and wildlife habitat; reduce wildfire risk; and maintain parks and trails; shall Napa County enact a 1/4 percent sales tax for the Napa County Regional Park and Open Space District raising an estimated eight million dollars annually for fourteen years with citizen oversight, annual audits, and funds that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4582, "fingerprint": "2016|201600069|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600069|NEVADA", "content_hash": "02b30accc04baf6b", "measure_id": "201600069", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain, restore and enhance library services including: (1) Providing children/teen services, such as homework help, computer classes, and school outreach; (2) Enhancing senior/disabled services; (3) Maintaining/restoring Library hours at all branches; (4) Keeping materials and services current, shall an ordinance be adopted extending the existing voter-approved sales tax at the adjusted rate of 1/4 cent, raising approximately $4 million annually, for 15 years, with citizen oversight, and requiring that all funds benefit Nevada County libraries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38423, "no_votes": 15873, "total_votes": 54296, "percent_yes": 70.76580226904376, "percent_no": 29.23419773095624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.361256", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.741933", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain, restore and enhance library services including: (1) Providing children/teen services, such as homework help, computer classes, and school outreach; (2) Enhancing senior/disabled services; (3) Maintaining/restoring Library hours at all branches; (4) Keeping materials and services current, shall an ordinance be adopted extending the existing voter-approved sales tax at the adjusted rate of 1/4 cent, raising approximately $4 million annually, for 15 years, with citizen oversight, and requiring that all funds benefit Nevada County libraries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4586, "fingerprint": "2016|201600705|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600705|NEVADA", "content_hash": "c3c6584f6c8f2ca2", "measure_id": "201600705", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/improve local high schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing classrooms/leaky roofs, updating facilities for career/technical education jobs in science, technology, engineering/math, ensuring safe drinking water/fire safety, replacing deteriorating sewer/gas lines, repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring education facilities, shall Nevada Joint Union High School District issue $47,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, require independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25579, "no_votes": 20133, "total_votes": 45712, "percent_yes": 55.95686034301716, "percent_no": 44.04313965698284, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.362582", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.742671", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/improve local high schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing classrooms/leaky roofs, updating facilities for career/technical education jobs in science, technology, engineering/math, ensuring safe drinking water/fire safety, replacing deteriorating sewer/gas lines, repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring education facilities, shall Nevada Joint Union High School District issue $47,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, require independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4585, "fingerprint": "2016|201600324|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600324|NEVADA", "content_hash": "1c3a225a1cfaf5a2", "measure_id": "201600324", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure Nevada City's Fire Station remains operational, continues to provide essential fire protection, 9-1-1 response, and emergency medical services to the community, and to fund one additional Police Officer for dedicated patrol and crime prevention services, shall the City of Nevada City enact a three-cent per one dollar transactions and use tax, with all funds to be spent locally, and subject to required annual financial audits and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1594, "no_votes": 340, "total_votes": 1934, "percent_yes": 82.41985522233712, "percent_no": 17.58014477766288, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.362270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.742487", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure Nevada City's Fire Station remains operational, continues to provide essential fire protection, 9-1-1 response, and emergency medical services to the community, and to fund one additional Police Officer for dedicated patrol and crime prevention services, shall the City of Nevada City enact a three-cent per one dollar transactions and use tax, with all funds to be spent locally, and subject to required annual financial audits and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4581, "fingerprint": "2016|201600068|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600068|NEVADA", "content_hash": "4ef209b8c25c88d3", "measure_id": "201600068", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which (a) bans outdoor cultivation, commercial cultivation and other commercial cannabis activities, (b) limits indoor cultivation to 12 plants per parcel in residential and rural areas, (c) prohibits indoor marijuana cultivation in unpermitted structures and areas used or intended for human occupancy, and (d) allows marijuana cultivation only by qualified patients and primary caregivers and only for medicinal purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17994, "no_votes": 26383, "total_votes": 44377, "percent_yes": 40.54803163801068, "percent_no": 59.45196836198932, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.360963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.741753", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which (a) bans outdoor cultivation, commercial cultivation and other commercial cannabis activities, (b) limits indoor cultivation to 12 plants per parcel in residential and rural areas, (c) prohibits indoor marijuana cultivation in unpermitted structures and areas used or intended for human occupancy, and (d) allows marijuana cultivation only by qualified patients and primary caregivers and only for medicinal purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4583, "fingerprint": "2016|201600322|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600322|NEVADA", "content_hash": "061114d6e2e974f0", "measure_id": "201600322", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To facilitate initiation of customer-friendly online transactions and simplify administration while keeping rates affordable, shall the City of Nevada City simplify its 59-year-old Business License Tax which provides revenues for municipal purposes by reducing rate methodologies from more than 30 to 2 with a lower maximum annual tax of $150 on large businesses and $100 on smaller businesses, subject to annual adjustments for inflation and required independent financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1240, "no_votes": 287, "total_votes": 1527, "percent_yes": 81.20497707924034, "percent_no": 18.795022920759664, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.361684", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.742114", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To facilitate initiation of customer-friendly online transactions and simplify administration while keeping rates affordable, shall the City of Nevada City simplify its 59-year-old Business License Tax which provides revenues for municipal purposes by reducing rate methodologies from more than 30 to 2 with a lower maximum annual tax of $150 on large businesses and $100 on smaller businesses, subject to annual adjustments for inflation and required independent financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4584, "fingerprint": "2016|201600323|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600323|NEVADA", "content_hash": "1de0999dfb5e71c3", "measure_id": "201600323", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the recently enacted hosted short-term rental regulations resulting from adoption by the City Council of Nevada City of a prior voter initiative (effective January 8, 2016) be repealed and replaced with the more restrictive provisions of an alternative voter initiative permitting on-line type home-sharing short-term rentals of two units in a single-family residence or small guest house only if the owner occupies the main dwelling and off-street parking is provided and making related General Plan amendments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 589, "no_votes": 1139, "total_votes": 1728, "percent_yes": 34.08564814814814, "percent_no": 65.91435185185186, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.361981", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.742299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the recently enacted hosted short-term rental regulations resulting from adoption by the City Council of Nevada City of a prior voter initiative (effective January 8, 2016) be repealed and replaced with the more restrictive provisions of an alternative voter initiative permitting on-line type home-sharing short-term rentals of two units in a single-family residence or small guest house only if the owner occupies the main dwelling and off-street parking is provided and making related General Plan amendments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4587, "fingerprint": "2016|201600070|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600070|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0f3a9296bfaace39", "measure_id": "201600070", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Ordinance amending the County Charter to establish the Campaign Finance and Ethics Commission to provide administrative oversight and enforcement of the Orange County Campaign Reform Ordinance and County ethics ordinances and amending the Orange County Campaign Reform Ordinance to remove unlawful provisions, allow for establishing an additional campaign bank account, under specified circumstances and repeal provisions pertaining to civil enforcement by the California Fair Political Practices Commission be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 400470, "no_votes": 174999, "total_votes": 575469, "percent_yes": 69.5901951278001, "percent_no": 30.4098048721999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.362901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.742854", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance amending the County Charter to establish the Campaign Finance and Ethics Commission to provide administrative oversight and enforcement of the Orange County Campaign Reform Ordinance and County ethics ordinances and amending the Orange County Campaign Reform Ordinance to remove unlawful provisions, allow for establishing an additional campaign bank account, under specified circumstances and repeal provisions pertaining to civil enforcement by the California Fair Political Practices Commission be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4605, "fingerprint": "2016|201600341|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600341|ORANGE", "content_hash": "857e4fd65b825e5b", "measure_id": "201600341", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance requiring voter approval for 1) construction of playgrounds, athletic fields, platforms/retaining walls for vista overlook, stairways to provide access to bluffs, new restrooms, parking lots, museum/multipurpose building, boardwalk and pedestrian bridges; 2) extended park hours for community events; 3) installation of parking lot lighting; or 4) other permanent structures at Fairview Park be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27098, "no_votes": 11149, "total_votes": 38247, "percent_yes": 70.85000130729208, "percent_no": 29.149998692707925, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.368830", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.746171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance requiring voter approval for 1) construction of playgrounds, athletic fields, platforms/retaining walls for vista overlook, stairways to provide access to bluffs, new restrooms, parking lots, museum/multipurpose building, boardwalk and pedestrian bridges; 2) extended park hours for community events; 3) installation of parking lot lighting; or 4) other permanent structures at Fairview Park be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4588, "fingerprint": "2016|201600071|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600071|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f75fc6174dbd5609", "measure_id": "201600071", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter for the County of Orange be amended to require the Auditor-Controller to prepare a fiscal impact statement for any countywide measure placed on the ballot?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 505640, "no_votes": 82615, "total_votes": 588255, "percent_yes": 85.95592047666403, "percent_no": 14.044079523335967, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.363304", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.743035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter for the County of Orange be amended to require the Auditor-Controller to prepare a fiscal impact statement for any countywide measure placed on the ballot?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4608, "fingerprint": "2016|201600344|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600344|ORANGE", "content_hash": "da8082cde7e21c02", "measure_id": "201600344", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Costa Mesa Measure Prohibiting Athletic Fields at Fairview Park, which prohibits the development of Athletic Fields at Fairview Park unless approved by a vote of the people, and permits implementation of Passive Recreational Uses at Fairview Park including those identified in the Fairview Park Master Plan (such as playgrounds, picnic areas, bike trails, bus access ways, and viewing areas), be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17591, "no_votes": 20289, "total_votes": 37880, "percent_yes": 46.43875395987328, "percent_no": 53.56124604012672, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.369743", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.746773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Costa Mesa Measure Prohibiting Athletic Fields at Fairview Park, which prohibits the development of Athletic Fields at Fairview Park unless approved by a vote of the people, and permits implementation of Passive Recreational Uses at Fairview Park including those identified in the Fairview Park Master Plan (such as playgrounds, picnic areas, bike trails, bus access ways, and viewing areas), be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4613, "fingerprint": "2016|201600706|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600706|ORANGE", "content_hash": "42d21fc6c8011607", "measure_id": "201600706", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve older schools with classrooms, science labs and school facilities that meet the same academic and safety standards as newer schools; update instructional technology and equipment to support science, engineering and other instruction; provide art and music classrooms; make schools accessible for students with disabilities; and improve traffic and safety around schools shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Irvine Unified School District issue $319 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, annual audits and all funds benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20714, "no_votes": 13694, "total_votes": 34408, "percent_yes": 60.201116019530346, "percent_no": 39.798883980469654, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.371168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.747694", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve older schools with classrooms, science labs and school facilities that meet the same academic and safety standards as newer schools; update instructional technology and equipment to support science, engineering and other instruction; provide art and music classrooms; make schools accessible for students with disabilities; and improve traffic and safety around schools shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Irvine Unified School District issue $319 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, annual audits and all funds benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4609, "fingerprint": "2016|201600345|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600345|ORANGE", "content_hash": "589ff9993033cf0e", "measure_id": "201600345", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Costa Mesa be elected by district as described in\u00a0Ordinance No. 16-05,\u00a0 establishing\u00a0 six\u00a0 equal,\u00a0 geographically based districts, and the Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa elected on a citywide basis for a term of two years by the voters of the entire city, for a maximum of two terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23295, "no_votes": 12495, "total_votes": 35790, "percent_yes": 65.08801341156747, "percent_no": 34.911986588432526, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.370019", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.746954", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Costa Mesa be elected by district as described in\u00a0Ordinance No. 16-05,\u00a0 establishing\u00a0 six\u00a0 equal,\u00a0 geographically based districts, and the Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa elected on a citywide basis for a term of two years by the voters of the entire city, for a maximum of two terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4614, "fingerprint": "2016|201600707|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600707|ORANGE", "content_hash": "61ed2dce0d0c696a", "measure_id": "201600707", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Should term limits be implemented for the Board of Education of the Orange Unified School District with that limit being three four-year terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39654, "no_votes": 6140, "total_votes": 45794, "percent_yes": 86.59212997335895, "percent_no": 13.40787002664105, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.371480", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.747881", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should term limits be implemented for the Board of Education of the Orange Unified School District with that limit being three four-year terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4610, "fingerprint": "2016|201600346|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600346|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ceca1cc7805ca347", "measure_id": "201600346", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance that approves the \"Cypress Town Center and Commons Specific Plan\" to allow for development of a town center, single-family and multi-family housing, commercial/senior housing and a public park on portions of Los Alamitos Race Course, the former Cypress Golf Club and adjacent properties, together with related general plan and specific plan amendments and zone changes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9626, "no_votes": 10059, "total_votes": 19685, "percent_yes": 48.9001778003556, "percent_no": 51.0998221996444, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.370291", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.747142", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance that approves the \"Cypress Town Center and Commons Specific Plan\" to allow for development of a town center, single-family and multi-family housing, commercial/senior housing and a public park on portions of Los Alamitos Race Course, the former Cypress Golf Club and adjacent properties, together with related general plan and specific plan amendments and zone changes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4589, "fingerprint": "2016|201600325|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600325|ORANGE", "content_hash": "bcfc1a9aa902b4c7", "measure_id": "201600325", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the 2015 Town Center Initiative, which changes the Town Center Plan previously approved by the City Council and the California Coastal Commission, as well as the amendments thereto approved by the City Council in 2015, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6477, "no_votes": 4557, "total_votes": 11034, "percent_yes": 58.70038064165307, "percent_no": 41.29961935834693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.363597", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.743217", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the 2015 Town Center Initiative, which changes the Town Center Plan previously approved by the City Council and the California Coastal Commission, as well as the amendments thereto approved by the City Council in 2015, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4595, "fingerprint": "2016|201600331|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600331|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8ed014074125bf64", "measure_id": "201600331", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain 911 emergency response times, fire stations, police officers/firefighters/paramedics, anti-gang/drug programs, after school, senior programs; upgrade first responder disaster communication; repair stormwater systems to prevent flooding, streets / potholes / parks ; other general city services, shall the City of Fountain Valley establish a one-cent sales tax providing $11.5 million annually for twenty year term, requiring public disclosure of expenditures, independent audits, all funds only for Fountain Valley.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14617, "no_votes": 9808, "total_votes": 24425, "percent_yes": 59.84442169907881, "percent_no": 40.15557830092119, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.365744", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.744331", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain 911 emergency response times, fire stations, police officers/firefighters/paramedics, anti-gang/drug programs, after school, senior programs; upgrade first responder disaster communication; repair stormwater systems to prevent flooding, streets / potholes / parks ; other general city services, shall the City of Fountain Valley establish a one-cent sales tax providing $11.5 million annually for twenty year term, requiring public disclosure of expenditures, independent audits, all funds only for Fountain Valley.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4590, "fingerprint": "2016|201600326|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600326|ORANGE", "content_hash": "28942a5601b82bde", "measure_id": "201600326", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town Center and Public Parking Improvement Measure, which ratifies the Town Center Plan previously approved by the City Council and the California Coastal Commission, as well as the amendments thereto approved by the City Council in 2015, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4561, "no_votes": 6449, "total_votes": 11010, "percent_yes": 41.42597638510445, "percent_no": 58.57402361489555, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.363892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.743407", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town Center and Public Parking Improvement Measure, which ratifies the Town Center Plan previously approved by the City Council and the California Coastal Commission, as well as the amendments thereto approved by the City Council in 2015, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4611, "fingerprint": "2016|201600347|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600347|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ca37d824f4ed224c", "measure_id": "201600347", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Fullerton be elected by districts described in Ordinance No. 3230?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23725, "no_votes": 20110, "total_votes": 43835, "percent_yes": 54.12341736055664, "percent_no": 45.87658263944336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.370563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.747326", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Fullerton be elected by districts described in Ordinance No. 3230?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4615, "fingerprint": "2016|201600708|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600708|ORANGE", "content_hash": "29dd6684f8fd74fd", "measure_id": "201600708", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize classrooms and older neighborhood schools to support reading, math, science, technology, arts, replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing, wiring/ air-conditioning, improve access for students with disabilities/ special medical needs, update technology, improve student safety/ security, acquire, renovate and construct classrooms, facilities, sites/ equipment, shall Anaheim Elementary School District issue $318,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37155, "no_votes": 11427, "total_votes": 48582, "percent_yes": 76.47894281832778, "percent_no": 23.52105718167222, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.371932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.748061", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize classrooms and older neighborhood schools to support reading, math, science, technology, arts, replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing, wiring/ air-conditioning, improve access for students with disabilities/ special medical needs, update technology, improve student safety/ security, acquire, renovate and construct classrooms, facilities, sites/ equipment, shall Anaheim Elementary School District issue $318,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4596, "fingerprint": "2016|201600332|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600332|ORANGE", "content_hash": "200e7f8f30c238ed", "measure_id": "201600332", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2016-1, establishing a one percent sales tax, to remain in effect until ended or modified by the voters, and raising an estimated $1,500,000 annually for any and all governmental purposes of the City, which may include any general fund services such as police patrols and crime prevention; 9-1-1 emergency response; and street maintenance/pothole repair; with the requirement for public audits and disclosures of all funds spent, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3775, "no_votes": 2481, "total_votes": 6256, "percent_yes": 60.3420716112532, "percent_no": 39.6579283887468, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.366035", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.744517", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2016-1, establishing a one percent sales tax, to remain in effect until ended or modified by the voters, and raising an estimated $1,500,000 annually for any and all governmental purposes of the City, which may include any general fund services such as police patrols and crime prevention; 9-1-1 emergency response; and street maintenance/pothole repair; with the requirement for public audits and disclosures of all funds spent, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4616, "fingerprint": "2016|201600709|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600709|ORANGE", "content_hash": "379fc74479df7fad", "measure_id": "201600709", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade outdated classrooms, leaky roofs, bathrooms/ plumbing/electrical wiring; meet handicap accessibility/earthquake safety requirements; remove asbestos/hazardous materials; upgrade libraries, science labs, technology; repair/construct/acquire/equip facilities; in order to help retain/attract quality teachers, protect property values and maintain quality local schools; shall Brea Olinda Unified School District issue $148,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and keeping funds local", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8192, "no_votes": 8386, "total_votes": 16578, "percent_yes": 49.41488719990348, "percent_no": 50.58511280009652, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.372206", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.748246", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade outdated classrooms, leaky roofs, bathrooms/ plumbing/electrical wiring; meet handicap accessibility/earthquake safety requirements; remove asbestos/hazardous materials; upgrade libraries, science labs, technology; repair/construct/acquire/equip facilities; in order to help retain/attract quality teachers, protect property values and maintain quality local schools; shall Brea Olinda Unified School District issue $148,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and keeping funds local", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4607, "fingerprint": "2016|201600343|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600343|ORANGE", "content_hash": "721cfb00aa39900b", "measure_id": "201600343", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance rescinding the City of Laguna Beach's prohibition of medical marijuana dispensaries, allowing for one dispensary for every 10,000 residents, and adopting regulations providing for administrative approval process, operator priority registration, operating standards, distance requirements from residential areas and schools, and which could allow the sale of marijuana for recreational use, known as An Initiative Measure Rescinding the City of Laguna Beach's Ban on Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and Authorizing the Operation and Regulation of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4002, "no_votes": 9702, "total_votes": 13704, "percent_yes": 29.2031523642732, "percent_no": 70.7968476357268, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.369434", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.746575", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance rescinding the City of Laguna Beach's prohibition of medical marijuana dispensaries, allowing for one dispensary for every 10,000 residents, and adopting regulations providing for administrative approval process, operator priority registration, operating standards, distance requirements from residential areas and schools, and which could allow the sale of marijuana for recreational use, known as An Initiative Measure Rescinding the City of Laguna Beach's Ban on Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and Authorizing the Operation and Regulation of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4625, "fingerprint": "2016|201600718|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600718|ORANGE", "content_hash": "72473ab71f216d68", "measure_id": "201600718", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Brea Olinda Unified School District decrease the number of governing board members from seven to five?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9747, "no_votes": 5984, "total_votes": 15731, "percent_yes": 61.96046023774713, "percent_no": 38.03953976225287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.374809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.749940", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Brea Olinda Unified School District decrease the number of governing board members from seven to five?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4597, "fingerprint": "2016|201600333|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600333|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fbf1c8ec723bac95", "measure_id": "201600333", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide services and improvements needed to accommodate millions of annual visitors, protect beaches from pollution and provide fire, police protection and emergency response, parking, utility undergrounding to prevent fires and power outages, and other services and improvements, shall City of Laguna Beach adopt an ordinance increasing transient occupancy taxes paid only by hotel and other rental guests from 10% to 12% until ended by voters, providing approximately $2,000,000 annually, with audits, all funds only for Laguna Beach?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10508, "no_votes": 2840, "total_votes": 13348, "percent_yes": 78.72340425531915, "percent_no": 21.276595744680847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.366325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.744700", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide services and improvements needed to accommodate millions of annual visitors, protect beaches from pollution and provide fire, police protection and emergency response, parking, utility undergrounding to prevent fires and power outages, and other services and improvements, shall City of Laguna Beach adopt an ordinance increasing transient occupancy taxes paid only by hotel and other rental guests from 10% to 12% until ended by voters, providing approximately $2,000,000 annually, with audits, all funds only for Laguna Beach?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4617, "fingerprint": "2016|201600710|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600710|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b72005622f247af0", "measure_id": "201600710", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade neighborhood schools by repairing outdated classrooms; improving science, technology, engineering, and math labs; ensuring fire/drinking water safety; removing asbestos; replacing leaky roofs; upgrading safety/security; repairing, constructing, and equipping educational facilities to prepare students for college/vocational/military careers, shall School Facilities Improvement District #2 of the Capistrano Unified School District issue $889 million in bonds at legal interest rates, requiring an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual independent audits, no funds for administrator or teacher salaries/benefits, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72915, "no_votes": 87452, "total_votes": 160367, "percent_yes": 45.46758372981972, "percent_no": 54.53241627018028, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.372482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.748443", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade neighborhood schools by repairing outdated classrooms; improving science, technology, engineering, and math labs; ensuring fire/drinking water safety; removing asbestos; replacing leaky roofs; upgrading safety/security; repairing, constructing, and equipping educational facilities to prepare students for college/vocational/military careers, shall School Facilities Improvement District #2 of the Capistrano Unified School District issue $889 million in bonds at legal interest rates, requiring an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual independent audits, no funds for administrator or teacher salaries/benefits, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4602, "fingerprint": "2016|201600338|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600338|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b7600440982c571c", "measure_id": "201600338", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section1115 be added to the Newport Beach City Charter to require at least five votes of the total City Council membership in order to place City Council sponsored general or special tax proposals on a ballot for voter consideration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32642, "no_votes": 7573, "total_votes": 40215, "percent_yes": 81.16871813999751, "percent_no": 18.83128186000249, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.367958", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.745630", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section1115 be added to the Newport Beach City Charter to require at least five votes of the total City Council membership in order to place City Council sponsored general or special tax proposals on a ballot for voter consideration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4618, "fingerprint": "2016|201600711|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600711|ORANGE", "content_hash": "80f8c3a148201ac5", "measure_id": "201600711", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/ modernize aging classrooms, science labs/ school facilities to keep pace with technology, including deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, improve student safety and campus security systems, acquire, renovate, construct, and equip classrooms, sites, facilities, labs, libraries and instructional technology to support student achievement in reading, math, arts, science/ technology, shall Centralia Elementary School District issue $49,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12769, "no_votes": 5032, "total_votes": 17801, "percent_yes": 71.7319251727431, "percent_no": 28.268074827256896, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.372790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.748635", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/ modernize aging classrooms, science labs/ school facilities to keep pace with technology, including deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, improve student safety and campus security systems, acquire, renovate, construct, and equip classrooms, sites, facilities, labs, libraries and instructional technology to support student achievement in reading, math, arts, science/ technology, shall Centralia Elementary School District issue $49,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4603, "fingerprint": "2016|201600339|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600339|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a2a0f6546b864d6d", "measure_id": "201600339", "measure_letter": "NN", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. O-2016-05 be approved to amend the City Charter to require the City Council to establish five equal, geographically based districts from which council members will be elected by residents of those districts to serve four year terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11135, "no_votes": 7536, "total_votes": 18671, "percent_yes": 59.63794119222323, "percent_no": 40.36205880777677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.368249", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.745811", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. O-2016-05 be approved to amend the City Charter to require the City Council to establish five equal, geographically based districts from which council members will be elected by residents of those districts to serve four year terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4619, "fingerprint": "2016|201600712|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600712|ORANGE", "content_hash": "010e657085601c43", "measure_id": "201600712", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "n order to repair and modernize aging classrooms and school facilities, including repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical and air conditioning systems; upgrade classrooms, science labs, libraries, facilities and technology that support student achievement in reading, math, arts, science and technology; and improve student safety and campus security, shall Fountain Valley School District issue $63 million in bonds at rates within legal limits, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15931, "no_votes": 8871, "total_votes": 24802, "percent_yes": 64.2327231674865, "percent_no": 35.7672768325135, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.373086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.748817", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "n order to repair and modernize aging classrooms and school facilities, including repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical and air conditioning systems; upgrade classrooms, science labs, libraries, facilities and technology that support student achievement in reading, math, arts, science and technology; and improve student safety and campus security, shall Fountain Valley School District issue $63 million in bonds at rates within legal limits, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4598, "fingerprint": "2016|201600334|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600334|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8fb5edb230066db4", "measure_id": "201600334", "measure_letter": "OO", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1627 be adopted to increase the transient occupancy tax (\u201cTOT\u201d) from its current rate of 10 percent to 13 percent in perpetuity, for an estimated annual increase of $570,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15035, "no_votes": 15043, "total_votes": 30078, "percent_yes": 49.98670124343374, "percent_no": 50.01329875656626, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.366629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.744885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1627 be adopted to increase the transient occupancy tax (\u201cTOT\u201d) from its current rate of 10 percent to 13 percent in perpetuity, for an estimated annual increase of $570,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4620, "fingerprint": "2016|201600713|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600713|ORANGE", "content_hash": "68ac01debffa27e9", "measure_id": "201600713", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/replace roofs, plumbing, and inadequate electrical systems; install air conditioning; upgrade classrooms, science labs, and access to instructional technology; provide classrooms/labs for career technology education that prepares students for college/careers; improve access for individuals with disabilities and earthquake/fire safety and campus security/lighting/cameras, shall Garden Grove Unified School District issue $311,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators and all funds locally-controlled", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58962, "no_votes": 18282, "total_votes": 77244, "percent_yes": 76.33214230231474, "percent_no": 23.667857697685264, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.373353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.748999", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/replace roofs, plumbing, and inadequate electrical systems; install air conditioning; upgrade classrooms, science labs, and access to instructional technology; provide classrooms/labs for career technology education that prepares students for college/careers; improve access for individuals with disabilities and earthquake/fire safety and campus security/lighting/cameras, shall Garden Grove Unified School District issue $311,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators and all funds locally-controlled", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4604, "fingerprint": "2016|201600340|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600340|ORANGE", "content_hash": "215eb6bb5821be44", "measure_id": "201600340", "measure_letter": "PP", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Ana Charter be amended to comply with the Council compensation formula provided for by California Government Code Section 36516 to ensure that Council compensation is set and strictly limited by such Government Code and to further provide that no increase in Council compensation shall be permitted without a vote of the electorate of the City of Santa Ana pursuant to a future Charter Amendment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44292, "no_votes": 20819, "total_votes": 65111, "percent_yes": 68.02537205694891, "percent_no": 31.97462794305109, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.368548", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.745991", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Ana Charter be amended to comply with the Council compensation formula provided for by California Government Code Section 36516 to ensure that Council compensation is set and strictly limited by such Government Code and to further provide that no increase in Council compensation shall be permitted without a vote of the electorate of the City of Santa Ana pursuant to a future Charter Amendment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4621, "fingerprint": "2016|201600714|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600714|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e007ae6160bdd9d9", "measure_id": "201600714", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct science, technology, engineering, and mathematics labs, repair or replace leaky roofs, renovate deteriorating plumbing/sewer systems, upgrade inadequate electrical systems, construct, renovate, modernize, equip classrooms, restrooms and other school facilities and to improve the quality of education at local schools; shall Huntington Beach City School District issue $159,850,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, and have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with no money for administrative salaries or taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25313, "no_votes": 14469, "total_votes": 39782, "percent_yes": 63.62927957367653, "percent_no": 36.37072042632347, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.373628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.749180", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct science, technology, engineering, and mathematics labs, repair or replace leaky roofs, renovate deteriorating plumbing/sewer systems, upgrade inadequate electrical systems, construct, renovate, modernize, equip classrooms, restrooms and other school facilities and to improve the quality of education at local schools; shall Huntington Beach City School District issue $159,850,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, and have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with no money for administrative salaries or taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4599, "fingerprint": "2016|201600335|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600335|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0e23fca5bdc41747", "measure_id": "201600335", "measure_letter": "QQ", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Stanton Ordinance #1045, adopted by voters on November 4, 2014, to generate revenues for city services such as neighborhood police patrols, fire protection services/paramedics, business/job creation, and senior programs, be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2987, "no_votes": 6423, "total_votes": 9410, "percent_yes": 31.74282678002125, "percent_no": 68.25717321997875, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.366919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.745078", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Stanton Ordinance #1045, adopted by voters on November 4, 2014, to generate revenues for city services such as neighborhood police patrols, fire protection services/paramedics, business/job creation, and senior programs, be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4622, "fingerprint": "2016|201600715|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600715|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fa57ac769dde79b7", "measure_id": "201600715", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/modernize aging classrooms/school facilities including improving student safety/campus security, disabled access, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, ventilation/electrical systems, and acquire, renovate, construct, and equip classrooms, sites, facilities, labs/instructional technology to support student achievement in reading, math, arts, science and technology, shall Ocean View School District of Orange County issue $169,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no money for teacher/administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22386, "no_votes": 15600, "total_votes": 37986, "percent_yes": 58.932238193018485, "percent_no": 41.067761806981515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.373909", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.749369", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/modernize aging classrooms/school facilities including improving student safety/campus security, disabled access, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, ventilation/electrical systems, and acquire, renovate, construct, and equip classrooms, sites, facilities, labs/instructional technology to support student achievement in reading, math, arts, science and technology, shall Ocean View School District of Orange County issue $169,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no money for teacher/administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4612, "fingerprint": "2016|201600348|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600348|ORANGE", "content_hash": "77b6596850e34d48", "measure_id": "201600348", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Stanton adopt a measure providing that a person may not hold office as a City Council member if he or she has, after December 31, 2015, served on the City Council for two full terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6916, "no_votes": 2276, "total_votes": 9192, "percent_yes": 75.23933855526545, "percent_no": 24.760661444734552, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.370829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.747513", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Stanton adopt a measure providing that a person may not hold office as a City Council member if he or she has, after December 31, 2015, served on the City Council for two full terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4623, "fingerprint": "2016|201600716|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600716|ORANGE", "content_hash": "81644767d8f3dc7d", "measure_id": "201600716", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize aging high school classrooms, labs and school facilities, including deteriorated roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, complete earthquake safety retrofits, improve campus safety/security, and upgrade careertraining facilities, science labs, libraries, and technology that support student achievement in math, science, engineering and skilled trades, shall Orange Unified School District issue $288,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all money locally-controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54143, "no_votes": 32534, "total_votes": 86677, "percent_yes": 62.46524452853698, "percent_no": 37.53475547146302, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.374254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.749564", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize aging high school classrooms, labs and school facilities, including deteriorated roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, complete earthquake safety retrofits, improve campus safety/security, and upgrade careertraining facilities, science labs, libraries, and technology that support student achievement in math, science, engineering and skilled trades, shall Orange Unified School District issue $288,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all money locally-controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4600, "fingerprint": "2016|201600336|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600336|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3e5eb08d90e9845d", "measure_id": "201600336", "measure_letter": "SS", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address state takeaways of local funds, protect property values, drinking water supplies and prevent cuts to: 9- 1- 1 response times; police officers/firefighters/paramedics; drug/ gang prevention, domestic violence/ sex crimes/ human trafficking NO units; and other general city services, shall an ordinance establishing a 1% transactions and use (sales) tax, expiring December 31, 2022, providing estimated $ 13. 9 million annually, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, all funds remaining in Westminster, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16867, "no_votes": 10970, "total_votes": 27837, "percent_yes": 60.592017818012, "percent_no": 39.407982181988, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.367208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.745260", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address state takeaways of local funds, protect property values, drinking water supplies and prevent cuts to: 9- 1- 1 response times; police officers/firefighters/paramedics; drug/ gang prevention, domestic violence/ sex crimes/ human trafficking NO units; and other general city services, shall an ordinance establishing a 1% transactions and use (sales) tax, expiring December 31, 2022, providing estimated $ 13. 9 million annually, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, all funds remaining in Westminster, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4624, "fingerprint": "2016|201600717|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600717|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4fb518423c98e5bf", "measure_id": "201600717", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade aging schools and improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; provide heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems at every school; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; improve student access to modern technology; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Westminster School District issue $76,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and NO money used for administrative or\r\nteacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17785, "no_votes": 7584, "total_votes": 25369, "percent_yes": 70.10524656076313, "percent_no": 29.894753439236865, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.374539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.749752", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade aging schools and improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; provide heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems at every school; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; improve student access to modern technology; and modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Westminster School District issue $76,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and NO money used for administrative or\r\nteacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4601, "fingerprint": "2016|201600337|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600337|ORANGE", "content_hash": "dbc21712c8cc76ec", "measure_id": "201600337", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1208.1 be added to the Anaheim City Charter to require at least a two-thirds vote of the total City Council membership in order to place City Council sponsored general or special tax proposals on a ballot for voter consideration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76728, "no_votes": 17330, "total_votes": 94058, "percent_yes": 81.57519828191117, "percent_no": 18.42480171808883, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.367530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.745448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1208.1 be added to the Anaheim City Charter to require at least a two-thirds vote of the total City Council membership in order to place City Council sponsored general or special tax proposals on a ballot for voter consideration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4591, "fingerprint": "2016|201600327|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600327|ORANGE", "content_hash": "41fb968c62adc360", "measure_id": "201600327", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to eight medical marijuana (cannabis) businesses with: six percent tax on medical marijuana (estimated annual tax revenues $48,000 to $912,000); one percent tax on other products; exemption from permits; regulations not subject to change by City Council except for increasing businesses; precedence to prior businesses; and locations limited to commercial and industrial areas, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14937, "no_votes": 24565, "total_votes": 39502, "percent_yes": 37.81327527720115, "percent_no": 62.18672472279885, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.364180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.743592", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to eight medical marijuana (cannabis) businesses with: six percent tax on medical marijuana (estimated annual tax revenues $48,000 to $912,000); one percent tax on other products; exemption from permits; regulations not subject to change by City Council except for increasing businesses; precedence to prior businesses; and locations limited to commercial and industrial areas, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4592, "fingerprint": "2016|201600328|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600328|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6fd3c1ca564aab51", "measure_id": "201600328", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to four medical marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical marijuana (estimated annual tax revenues $24,000 to $456,000); required industry specific licenses; required operator permits; regulations subject to change by City Council including increasing businesses; precedence to prior businesses; and locations limited to commercial and industrial areas, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16501, "no_votes": 22695, "total_votes": 39196, "percent_yes": 42.09868353913664, "percent_no": 57.90131646086336, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.364470", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.743776", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to four medical marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical marijuana (estimated annual tax revenues $24,000 to $456,000); required industry specific licenses; required operator permits; regulations subject to change by City Council including increasing businesses; precedence to prior businesses; and locations limited to commercial and industrial areas, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4593, "fingerprint": "2016|201600329|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600329|ORANGE", "content_hash": "54160fb780d0ad0e", "measure_id": "201600329", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance, to allow medical marijuana manufacturing, processing, wholesale distribution and transporting, and research, development and testing, in manufacturing and industrial zones north of South Coast Dr. and west of Harbor Blvd., subject to conditional use permit and business permits, including requirements for background checks, premises security, business records, that is subject to amendment by City Council, and that levies an annual 6% gross receipts tax (estimated annual revenue $48,000 - $912,000), be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21470, "no_votes": 17845, "total_votes": 39315, "percent_yes": 54.6101996693374, "percent_no": 45.3898003306626, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.364970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.743956", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance, to allow medical marijuana manufacturing, processing, wholesale distribution and transporting, and research, development and testing, in manufacturing and industrial zones north of South Coast Dr. and west of Harbor Blvd., subject to conditional use permit and business permits, including requirements for background checks, premises security, business records, that is subject to amendment by City Council, and that levies an annual 6% gross receipts tax (estimated annual revenue $48,000 - $912,000), be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4606, "fingerprint": "2016|201600342|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600342|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8b06ec1c666056dd", "measure_id": "201600342", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance to require voter approval of development projects that require adoption, amendment, change or replacement of the General Plan, the Zoning Code, a specific plan, or an overlay plan, and that generates over 200 additional trips, increases intersection volume/capacity, changes the intersection utilization/level of service, adds 40 or more dwelling units, adds 10,000 sq.\u2019 of non-residential use, or changes a public use to a private use under specified conditions, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26132, "no_votes": 12081, "total_votes": 38213, "percent_yes": 68.3851045455735, "percent_no": 31.614895454426502, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.369110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.746351", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance to require voter approval of development projects that require adoption, amendment, change or replacement of the General Plan, the Zoning Code, a specific plan, or an overlay plan, and that generates over 200 additional trips, increases intersection volume/capacity, changes the intersection utilization/level of service, adds 40 or more dwelling units, adds 10,000 sq.\u2019 of non-residential use, or changes a public use to a private use under specified conditions, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4594, "fingerprint": "2016|201600330|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600330|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8466cbfd27482880", "measure_id": "201600330", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Costa Mesa Measure for Sensible Community Development and Development-Funded Open Space and Recreation, which ratifies the City\u2019s existing land use regulations, ensures that approximately 25% of the State Developmental Hospital on Harbor Boulevard would be zoned as passive or recreational open space, and establishes a fee paid for by developers for the purpose of funding new active recreation, open space, and public park facilities within the City, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20506, "no_votes": 16258, "total_votes": 36764, "percent_yes": 55.77739092590578, "percent_no": 44.22260907409422, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.365351", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.744138", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Costa Mesa Measure for Sensible Community Development and Development-Funded Open Space and Recreation, which ratifies the City\u2019s existing land use regulations, ensures that approximately 25% of the State Developmental Hospital on Harbor Boulevard would be zoned as passive or recreational open space, and establishes a fee paid for by developers for the purpose of funding new active recreation, open space, and public park facilities within the City, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4633, "fingerprint": "2016|201600719|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600719|PLACER", "content_hash": "cc68a74f9157f2c4", "measure_id": "201600719", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct new middle and high school facilities and acquire land to accommodate growing student enrollment and avoid overcrowding to support high academic achievement, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Village 1, Zone A) of Western Placer Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of not to exceed $175,000,000 with interest rates below legal limits and no money for salaries or other routine school operating expenses with all money raised benefiting local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 4, "percent_yes": 25.0, "percent_no": 75.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.377066", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.751414", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct new middle and high school facilities and acquire land to accommodate growing student enrollment and avoid overcrowding to support high academic achievement, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Village 1, Zone A) of Western Placer Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of not to exceed $175,000,000 with interest rates below legal limits and no money for salaries or other routine school operating expenses with all money raised benefiting local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4634, "fingerprint": "2016|201600720|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600720|PLACER", "content_hash": "946f21570698c26c", "measure_id": "201600720", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct new elementary, middle and high school facilities and acquire land to accommodate growing student enrollment and avoid overcrowding to support high academic achievement, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (Village 7, Zone B) of the Western Placer Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of not to exceed $215,000,000 with interest rate below legal limits and no money for salaries or other routine school operating expenses with all money raised benefiting local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4, "no_votes": 7, "total_votes": 11, "percent_yes": 36.36363636363636, "percent_no": 63.63636363636364, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.377333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.751600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct new elementary, middle and high school facilities and acquire land to accommodate growing student enrollment and avoid overcrowding to support high academic achievement, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (Village 7, Zone B) of the Western Placer Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of not to exceed $215,000,000 with interest rate below legal limits and no money for salaries or other routine school operating expenses with all money raised benefiting local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4635, "fingerprint": "2016|201600721|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600721|PLACER", "content_hash": "58abfc49f436d2c6", "measure_id": "201600721", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Colfax, Del Oro, Foresthill, Placer, Chana and Maidu high schools, and Placer Adult School by renovating/constructing classrooms/educational facilities including Career Technical Education and Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Math (STEAM); and upgrading/replacing emergency systems, technology infrastructure, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and roofing; shall Placer Union High School District issue $135 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, no funds for teacher/administrator salaries, and citizen oversight guaranteeing funds spent only on our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15858, "no_votes": 15326, "total_votes": 31184, "percent_yes": 50.8530015392509, "percent_no": 49.1469984607491, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.377602", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.751785", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Colfax, Del Oro, Foresthill, Placer, Chana and Maidu high schools, and Placer Adult School by renovating/constructing classrooms/educational facilities including Career Technical Education and Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Math (STEAM); and upgrading/replacing emergency systems, technology infrastructure, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and roofing; shall Placer Union High School District issue $135 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, no funds for teacher/administrator salaries, and citizen oversight guaranteeing funds spent only on our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4637, "fingerprint": "2016|201600723|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600723|PLACER", "content_hash": "8c2b134930d68a9d", "measure_id": "201600723", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade local high schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Roseville Joint Union High School District upgrade science, engineering, math, career technology and core academic classrooms/facilities, support academic instruction and prepare students for 21st Century jobs, replace electrical wiring, leaky roofs, ensure classroom accessibility, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, schools, sites/equipment, by issuing $96,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43243, "no_votes": 27197, "total_votes": 70440, "percent_yes": 61.38983532084043, "percent_no": 38.61016467915957, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.378130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.752155", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade local high schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Roseville Joint Union High School District upgrade science, engineering, math, career technology and core academic classrooms/facilities, support academic instruction and prepare students for 21st Century jobs, replace electrical wiring, leaky roofs, ensure classroom accessibility, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, schools, sites/equipment, by issuing $96,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4629, "fingerprint": "2016|201600351|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600351|PLACER", "content_hash": "77d8fd408d4be830", "measure_id": "201600351", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support the continued operation of the Loomis library, and for other general fund purposes, shall a quarter percent transactions and use tax (\"sales tax\") aising approximately $250,000 annually be adopted for a period of ten years, subject to annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2103, "no_votes": 1426, "total_votes": 3529, "percent_yes": 59.591952394446025, "percent_no": 40.408047605553975, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.375945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.750683", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support the continued operation of the Loomis library, and for other general fund purposes, shall a quarter percent transactions and use tax (\"sales tax\") aising approximately $250,000 annually be adopted for a period of ten years, subject to annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4630, "fingerprint": "2016|201600352|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600352|PLACER", "content_hash": "3ad97bf1cb1c6f98", "measure_id": "201600352", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If a local transactions and use tax is enacted in the Town of Loomis, should its revenue be used predominantly to support the continued operation of the Loomis Library?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2210, "no_votes": 1221, "total_votes": 3431, "percent_yes": 64.41270766540367, "percent_no": 35.58729233459633, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.376207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.750864", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If a local transactions and use tax is enacted in the Town of Loomis, should its revenue be used predominantly to support the continued operation of the Loomis Library?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4628, "fingerprint": "2016|201600350|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600350|PLACER", "content_hash": "faf5075e0071826b", "measure_id": "201600350", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Colfax adopt an ordinance which allows and regulates marijuana dispensaries, cultivation, delivery and use, and imposes a sales tax of up to fifteen  percent (15%) on the sale of marijuana and marijuana products, which shall be in addition to established municipal and state taxes on such sales, and dedicates all revenues derived from such tax to reduce City business and residential sewer service charges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 514, "no_votes": 291, "total_votes": 805, "percent_yes": 63.85093167701863, "percent_no": 36.14906832298137, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.375681", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.750503", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Colfax adopt an ordinance which allows and regulates marijuana dispensaries, cultivation, delivery and use, and imposes a sales tax of up to fifteen  percent (15%) on the sale of marijuana and marijuana products, which shall be in addition to established municipal and state taxes on such sales, and dedicates all revenues derived from such tax to reduce City business and residential sewer service charges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4627, "fingerprint": "2016|201600349|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600349|PLACER", "content_hash": "d2cf3a7bcbad1176", "measure_id": "201600349", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Auburn Municipal Code to amend the definition of \"operator\", so the tax is collected by all persons receiving consideration from the rental, including on-line hotel brokers and vacation rental agencies and shall the rate of the TOT be increased to 10%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2725, "no_votes": 4079, "total_votes": 6804, "percent_yes": 40.04997060552616, "percent_no": 59.95002939447384, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.375410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.750314", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Auburn Municipal Code to amend the definition of \"operator\", so the tax is collected by all persons receiving consideration from the rental, including on-line hotel brokers and vacation rental agencies and shall the rate of the TOT be increased to 10%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4631, "fingerprint": "2016|201600353|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600353|PLACER", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201600353", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3502, "no_votes": 2972, "total_votes": 6474, "percent_yes": 54.09329626197096, "percent_no": 45.90670373802904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.376467", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.751044", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4636, "fingerprint": "2016|201600722|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600722|PLACER", "content_hash": "50d7c7e0ecc5a3a8", "measure_id": "201600722", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade classrooms and high school facilities districtwide including Career Technical Education facilities and science labs; acquire, construct/repair science, technology, engineering, arts, math classrooms, outdated roofs, fire alarms, electrical, plumbing, heating/air conditioning systems; and qualify for State matching funds; shall Placer Union High School District issue $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all money benefiting local schools and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24801, "no_votes": 21701, "total_votes": 46502, "percent_yes": 53.33318997032386, "percent_no": 46.66681002967614, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.377866", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.751973", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade classrooms and high school facilities districtwide including Career Technical Education facilities and science labs; acquire, construct/repair science, technology, engineering, arts, math classrooms, outdated roofs, fire alarms, electrical, plumbing, heating/air conditioning systems; and qualify for State matching funds; shall Placer Union High School District issue $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all money benefiting local schools and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4626, "fingerprint": "2016|201600072|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600072|PLACER", "content_hash": "81e70747e5f95513", "measure_id": "201600072", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Placer County reconfigure the 80/65 Interchange to relieve congestion; better maintain roads countywide; provide dedicated funding for rural road pothole repair; widen roadways/expand transit; expand Highway 65 in each direction; provide safe routes to school; add seniors/disabled persons transit; widen Baseline Road and build Placer Parkway creating I-80 alternatives, by establishing a one-half cent sales tax, limited to 30 years, raising $53 million annually, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, and increasing eligibility for state/federal matching?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 114920, "no_votes": 65199, "total_votes": 180119, "percent_yes": 63.802264058761146, "percent_no": 36.197735941238854, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.375073", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.750126", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Placer County reconfigure the 80/65 Interchange to relieve congestion; better maintain roads countywide; provide dedicated funding for rural road pothole repair; widen roadways/expand transit; expand Highway 65 in each direction; provide safe routes to school; add seniors/disabled persons transit; widen Baseline Road and build Placer Parkway creating I-80 alternatives, by establishing a one-half cent sales tax, limited to 30 years, raising $53 million annually, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, and increasing eligibility for state/federal matching?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4638, "fingerprint": "2016|201600724|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600724|PLACER", "content_hash": "77750ab160d6c118", "measure_id": "201600724", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new elementary school to prevent overcrowding and to upgrade/enhance/expand Glen Edwards Middle School by repairing classrooms, leaky roofs, ensuring safe drinking water, improving student safety, and updating and constructing science, math, computer labs, and a new gymnasium, shall Western Placer Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, require independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, with all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15012, "no_votes": 11583, "total_votes": 26595, "percent_yes": 56.44670050761421, "percent_no": 43.55329949238579, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.378453", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.752337", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new elementary school to prevent overcrowding and to upgrade/enhance/expand Glen Edwards Middle School by repairing classrooms, leaky roofs, ensuring safe drinking water, improving student safety, and updating and constructing science, math, computer labs, and a new gymnasium, shall Western Placer Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, require independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, with all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4632, "fingerprint": "2016|201600725|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600725|PLACER", "content_hash": "8520cb62bb59764d", "measure_id": "201600725", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 44, "percent_yes": 38.63636363636363, "percent_no": 61.36363636363637, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.376741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.751226", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4639, "fingerprint": "2016|201600073|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600073|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "09e2e1e0d3c37b12", "measure_id": "201600073", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Upon adoption by the majority of registered voters in the Grizzly Ranch Community Services District, shall the Board of Directors for the Grizzly Ranch Community Services District (currently the County Board of Supervisors) be changed to a Board of Directors elected at large by registered voters of the district with such directors taking office if the measure is passed by a majority vote?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 21, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-28", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.378825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.752524", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Upon adoption by the majority of registered voters in the Grizzly Ranch Community Services District, shall the Board of Directors for the Grizzly Ranch Community Services District (currently the County Board of Supervisors) be changed to a Board of Directors elected at large by registered voters of the district with such directors taking office if the measure is passed by a majority vote?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4640, "fingerprint": "2016|201600726|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600726|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "b6d4e2d3e4c9b7b2", "measure_id": "201600726", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/improve local schools, repair infrastructure to provide access to technology, update classrooms and learning environments, maximize energy efficiency, improve building safety, ensure safe drinking water, upgrade school security/fire safety, deteriorating plumbing, bathrooms, repair construct, equp and acquire education facilities, shall Plumas Unified School District issue $50,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, require independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5322, "no_votes": 4001, "total_votes": 9323, "percent_yes": 57.08462941113376, "percent_no": 42.91537058886624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.379180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.752709", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/improve local schools, repair infrastructure to provide access to technology, update classrooms and learning environments, maximize energy efficiency, improve building safety, ensure safe drinking water, upgrade school security/fire safety, deteriorating plumbing, bathrooms, repair construct, equp and acquire education facilities, shall Plumas Unified School District issue $50,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, require independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4641, "fingerprint": "2016|201600354|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600354|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3f77deab00a39144", "measure_id": "201600354", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Rancho Mirage require that any future amendment or repeal of Ordinance No. 1099, which currently prohibits Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (not including golf carts) on or adjacent to certain designated streets including Highway 111, Bob Hope Drive; Country Club Drive; Da Vall Drive; Dinah Shore Drive; Frank Sinatra Drive; Gerald Ford Drive; Magnesia Falls Drive; Monterey Avenue; Plumley Road, and others, be subject to prior voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3810, "no_votes": 1274, "total_votes": 5084, "percent_yes": 74.94099134539732, "percent_no": 25.05900865460268, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.379458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.752895", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Rancho Mirage require that any future amendment or repeal of Ordinance No. 1099, which currently prohibits Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (not including golf carts) on or adjacent to certain designated streets including Highway 111, Bob Hope Drive; Country Club Drive; Da Vall Drive; Dinah Shore Drive; Frank Sinatra Drive; Gerald Ford Drive; Magnesia Falls Drive; Monterey Avenue; Plumley Road, and others, be subject to prior voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4642, "fingerprint": "2016|201600355|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600355|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "aeb7d8b681379d6b", "measure_id": "201600355", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you approve of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) spending One Hundred Million Dollars ($100,000,000) or more to construct the CV Link, plus, according to the March 2015 Master Plan, an additional $1.6 million annually to operate and maintain the CV Link pathway, which CVAG proposes to extend through Rancho Mirage business and residential districts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1087, "no_votes": 4058, "total_votes": 5145, "percent_yes": 21.127308066083568, "percent_no": 78.87269193391643, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.379729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.753079", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you approve of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) spending One Hundred Million Dollars ($100,000,000) or more to construct the CV Link, plus, according to the March 2015 Master Plan, an additional $1.6 million annually to operate and maintain the CV Link pathway, which CVAG proposes to extend through Rancho Mirage business and residential districts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4643, "fingerprint": "2016|201600356|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600356|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1203ed6ca35d914d", "measure_id": "201600356", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If CV Link were to be constructed, would you approve the City Council committing Rancho Mirage to pay for CV Link\u2019s annual operations and maintenance expenses, which on April 6, 2015, CVAG projected Rancho Mirage\u2019s share to be between $110,300 and $251,800 per annum as of the 9th year of operations, and continuing to increase annually at the rate of inflation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1126, "no_votes": 4021, "total_votes": 5147, "percent_yes": 21.87682144938799, "percent_no": 78.12317855061201, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.380182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.753267", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If CV Link were to be constructed, would you approve the City Council committing Rancho Mirage to pay for CV Link\u2019s annual operations and maintenance expenses, which on April 6, 2015, CVAG projected Rancho Mirage\u2019s share to be between $110,300 and $251,800 per annum as of the 9th year of operations, and continuing to increase annually at the rate of inflation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4644, "fingerprint": "2016|201600357|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600357|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ed40a0d35ce06264", "measure_id": "201600357", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Because in 2002 County voters approved Measure A, which is a \u00bd cent increase in our sales tax to be used to repair dilapidated and crumbling roads and highways in the Coachella Valley, should CVAG be allowed to divert up to $20 million dollars ($20,000,000) from this Measure A fund, to pay for the construction of the Neighborhood Electric Vehicles portion of the CV Link?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 994, "no_votes": 4133, "total_votes": 5127, "percent_yes": 19.387556075677782, "percent_no": 80.61244392432222, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.380453", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.753489", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Because in 2002 County voters approved Measure A, which is a \u00bd cent increase in our sales tax to be used to repair dilapidated and crumbling roads and highways in the Coachella Valley, should CVAG be allowed to divert up to $20 million dollars ($20,000,000) from this Measure A fund, to pay for the construction of the Neighborhood Electric Vehicles portion of the CV Link?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4646, "fingerprint": "2016|201600359|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600359|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "025c98678ee0b9d7", "measure_id": "201600359", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 702 of the City Charter be amended to establish that the Office of City Prosecutor be created within the City Attorney's Office, and the City Attorney acts as City Prosecutor and charged with the duty on behalf of the people of prosecuting misdemeanor offenses arising out of violations of state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19625, "no_votes": 30368, "total_votes": 49993, "percent_yes": 39.25549576940771, "percent_no": 60.74450423059229, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.380991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.753883", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 702 of the City Charter be amended to establish that the Office of City Prosecutor be created within the City Attorney's Office, and the City Attorney acts as City Prosecutor and charged with the duty on behalf of the people of prosecuting misdemeanor offenses arising out of violations of state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4659, "fingerprint": "2016|201600372|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600372|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "541c9943b2177335", "measure_id": "201600372", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In the event future State or local law permits marijuana activities to operate in the City of San Jacinto, shall the City enact a tax on marijuana activities of up to $50 per square foot of space utilized for marijuana cultivation or manufacturing, and up to 15% of the gross receipts from marijuana and related products, generating approximately $1,250,000 annually to pay for general City services, such as police, fire, and parks, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7748, "no_votes": 3698, "total_votes": 11446, "percent_yes": 67.69177005067273, "percent_no": 32.30822994932727, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.384803", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.756634", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In the event future State or local law permits marijuana activities to operate in the City of San Jacinto, shall the City enact a tax on marijuana activities of up to $50 per square foot of space utilized for marijuana cultivation or manufacturing, and up to 15% of the gross receipts from marijuana and related products, generating approximately $1,250,000 annually to pay for general City services, such as police, fire, and parks, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4647, "fingerprint": "2016|201600360|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600360|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1a87cb8ae86d3189", "measure_id": "201600360", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 403 of the City Charter be amended to increase the City Council member salary to be eighty percent (80\u00a0%) of the Mayor's salary?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9200, "no_votes": 41636, "total_votes": 50836, "percent_yes": 18.09741128334251, "percent_no": 81.90258871665749, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.381257", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.754069", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 403 of the City Charter be amended to increase the City Council member salary to be eighty percent (80\u00a0%) of the Mayor's salary?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4660, "fingerprint": "2016|201600373|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600373|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b822acdd38819b25", "measure_id": "201600373", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Jacinto increase the Transient Occupancy (Hotel Room) Tax rate from 8% to 12%, generating approximately $20,000 more annually to pay for general City services, such as police, fire, and parks, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5869, "no_votes": 5543, "total_votes": 11412, "percent_yes": 51.42832106554504, "percent_no": 48.57167893445496, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.385069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.756863", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Jacinto increase the Transient Occupancy (Hotel Room) Tax rate from 8% to 12%, generating approximately $20,000 more annually to pay for general City services, such as police, fire, and parks, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4668, "fingerprint": "2016|201600728|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600728|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "71d99aafa6f9283f", "measure_id": "201600728", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For College of the Desert to modernize career training facilities for nursing, public safety, science, technology, engineering and other in-demand jobs that prepare students for the success in college/careers; repair/construct/acquire classrooms facilities, sites and equipment throughout Coachella Valley; improve the Veteran's Center to provide counseling /training/job placement for returning veterans, shall Desert Community College District issue $577,860,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators and all money locally-controlled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 94765, "no_votes": 35661, "total_votes": 130426, "percent_yes": 72.65805897597104, "percent_no": 27.341941024028955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.387394", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.758670", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For College of the Desert to modernize career training facilities for nursing, public safety, science, technology, engineering and other in-demand jobs that prepare students for the success in college/careers; repair/construct/acquire classrooms facilities, sites and equipment throughout Coachella Valley; improve the Veteran's Center to provide counseling /training/job placement for returning veterans, shall Desert Community College District issue $577,860,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators and all money locally-controlled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4654, "fingerprint": "2016|201600367|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600367|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a8ee8cab7c674e19", "measure_id": "201600367", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2016-199 of the City of Menifee to reduce traffic congestion; improve/repair local interchanges/overpasses/streets/roads/bridges/potholes; maintain local police/fire protection/paramedics/9-1-1 emergency response times; prevent cuts to senior/disabled/youth programs; and provide other general services by enacting a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing $6.2 million annually until ended by voters; requiring annual independent audits, all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22104, "no_votes": 10279, "total_votes": 32383, "percent_yes": 68.25803662415466, "percent_no": 31.741963375845344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.383390", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.755479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2016-199 of the City of Menifee to reduce traffic congestion; improve/repair local interchanges/overpasses/streets/roads/bridges/potholes; maintain local police/fire protection/paramedics/9-1-1 emergency response times; prevent cuts to senior/disabled/youth programs; and provide other general services by enacting a 1\u00a2 sales tax providing $6.2 million annually until ended by voters; requiring annual independent audits, all funds spent locally, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4645, "fingerprint": "2016|201600358|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600358|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "14f6fcc2ea289b77", "measure_id": "201600358", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain/improve Police, Fire, and Paramedic/911 Emergency services, the number of police officers/firefighters, rapid response to gang violence, tracking of sex offenders/parolees; and, restore anti-gang/anti-drug units, shall the City of Hemet establish a 1\u00a0% sales tax (1 cent) for 10 years only, providing $10,000,000 annually, with annual audits, and all funds required by law to be used in Hemet for police/fire services only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10719, "no_votes": 6267, "total_votes": 16986, "percent_yes": 63.10490992582126, "percent_no": 36.89509007417874, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.380725", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.753691", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/improve Police, Fire, and Paramedic/911 Emergency services, the number of police officers/firefighters, rapid response to gang violence, tracking of sex offenders/parolees; and, restore anti-gang/anti-drug units, shall the City of Hemet establish a 1\u00a0% sales tax (1 cent) for 10 years only, providing $10,000,000 annually, with annual audits, and all funds required by law to be used in Hemet for police/fire services only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4665, "fingerprint": "2016|201600378|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600378|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4b4833d68fd8da06", "measure_id": "201600378", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2016-198, amending Measure Z and Menifee Municipal Code Section 2.32.010 to provide that, if the Mayor of the City of Menifee serves four year terms, then the Mayor of the City of Menifee shall be subject to the same term limitations as are otherwise applicable to members of the City Council of the City of Menifee, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23322, "no_votes": 7938, "total_votes": 31260, "percent_yes": 74.60652591170826, "percent_no": 25.39347408829174, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.386598", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.758011", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2016-198, amending Measure Z and Menifee Municipal Code Section 2.32.010 to provide that, if the Mayor of the City of Menifee serves four year terms, then the Mayor of the City of Menifee shall be subject to the same term limitations as are otherwise applicable to members of the City Council of the City of Menifee, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4666, "fingerprint": "2016|201600379|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600379|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3d9b23652f20c0e7", "measure_id": "201600379", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2016-197, amending Measure BB and Menifee Municipal Code Section 2.32.010 to provide that, commencing with the November 2016 general election, the term of the office of Mayor of the City of Menifee is changed from two years to four years, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17158, "no_votes": 14121, "total_votes": 31279, "percent_yes": 54.85469484318553, "percent_no": 45.14530515681447, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.386863", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.758235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2016-197, amending Measure BB and Menifee Municipal Code Section 2.32.010 to provide that, commencing with the November 2016 general election, the term of the office of Mayor of the City of Menifee is changed from two years to four years, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4653, "fingerprint": "2016|201600366|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600366|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d4d46b1b43b71f5b", "measure_id": "201600366", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance providing revenue, which the State cannot take, to be used locally for police protection; projects such as parks, streets, landscaping and flood control; programs attracting businesses; youth/senior services; sports/recreation programs; preserving property values and quality of life, by setting a permanent 1% transactions (sales) and use tax, subject to citizen oversight, raising six million dollars annually (estimated), with all funds dedicated to general City services, programs and projects, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8233, "no_votes": 6809, "total_votes": 15042, "percent_yes": 54.73341310995878, "percent_no": 45.26658689004122, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.383090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.755236", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance providing revenue, which the State cannot take, to be used locally for police protection; projects such as parks, streets, landscaping and flood control; programs attracting businesses; youth/senior services; sports/recreation programs; preserving property values and quality of life, by setting a permanent 1% transactions (sales) and use tax, subject to citizen oversight, raising six million dollars annually (estimated), with all funds dedicated to general City services, programs and projects, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4651, "fingerprint": "2016|201600364|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600364|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "eb3a6071412d0ece", "measure_id": "201600364", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain Indian Wells Golf Resort long-term financial stability, shall the Indian Wells Municipal Code be amended to increase the Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax rate from 11.25% to 12.25% of rent charged for transient occupancy of any hotel room or similar lodging, with the 1% rate increase generating an estimated $630,000 annually that will specifically fund the operations, maintenance, and improvement of the Golf Resort, until ended by voters?[", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1371, "no_votes": 960, "total_votes": 2331, "percent_yes": 58.815958815958815, "percent_no": 41.184041184041185, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.382396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.754868", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain Indian Wells Golf Resort long-term financial stability, shall the Indian Wells Municipal Code be amended to increase the Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax rate from 11.25% to 12.25% of rent charged for transient occupancy of any hotel room or similar lodging, with the 1% rate increase generating an estimated $630,000 annually that will specifically fund the operations, maintenance, and improvement of the Golf Resort, until ended by voters?[", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4664, "fingerprint": "2016|201600377|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600377|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4c150bff72a7de35", "measure_id": "201600377", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 2.08.180 be added to the Indian Wells Municipal Code to prohibit the City Council from taking any action to approve the establishment, development or installation of all or any part of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments' \"CV Link\" Project within the City, unless approved by a majority of City voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1552, "no_votes": 734, "total_votes": 2286, "percent_yes": 67.8915135608049, "percent_no": 32.108486439195104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.386297", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.757783", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 2.08.180 be added to the Indian Wells Municipal Code to prohibit the City Council from taking any action to approve the establishment, development or installation of all or any part of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments' \"CV Link\" Project within the City, unless approved by a majority of City voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4662, "fingerprint": "2016|201600375|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600375|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a0db992230ca0283", "measure_id": "201600375", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To enhance local control over municipal affairs, shall the City of Cathedral City Charter be adopted to establish Cathedral City as a charter city, and giving the City the power to establish public works contracting procedures, set penalties for violations of ordinances and resolutions, and appoint a city clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7273, "no_votes": 6415, "total_votes": 13688, "percent_yes": 53.13413208649912, "percent_no": 46.86586791350088, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.385736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.757320", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance local control over municipal affairs, shall the City of Cathedral City Charter be adopted to establish Cathedral City as a charter city, and giving the City the power to establish public works contracting procedures, set penalties for violations of ordinances and resolutions, and appoint a city clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4672, "fingerprint": "2016|201600731|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600731|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a34082658bd5c7c0", "measure_id": "201600731", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize or construct new classrooms; replace leaky pipes and inefficient heating /cooling systems; improve student safety; and reduce borrowing costs, shall $216.46 million of Palm Springs Unified School District bonds, previously approved by voters in February 2008, be reauthorized through the issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates at or below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and used elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39831, "no_votes": 12943, "total_votes": 52774, "percent_yes": 75.47466555500814, "percent_no": 24.525334444991856, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.388518", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.759402", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize or construct new classrooms; replace leaky pipes and inefficient heating /cooling systems; improve student safety; and reduce borrowing costs, shall $216.46 million of Palm Springs Unified School District bonds, previously approved by voters in February 2008, be reauthorized through the issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates at or below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and used elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4649, "fingerprint": "2016|201600362|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600362|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f6191dfd414e63c3", "measure_id": "201600362", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve basic city services, such as police and emergency response, parks and youth/senior services, and street repair, shall the City of Coachella enact a tax on marijuana businesses of up to $15 per square foot of space utilized for marijuana cultivation or manufacturing, and up to 6% of the gross receipts from the sale of marijuana and related products, whether at wholesale or retail, generating approximately $4,000,000 annually, until ended by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5950, "no_votes": 1309, "total_votes": 7259, "percent_yes": 81.9672131147541, "percent_no": 18.032786885245898, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.381837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.754466", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve basic city services, such as police and emergency response, parks and youth/senior services, and street repair, shall the City of Coachella enact a tax on marijuana businesses of up to $15 per square foot of space utilized for marijuana cultivation or manufacturing, and up to 6% of the gross receipts from the sale of marijuana and related products, whether at wholesale or retail, generating approximately $4,000,000 annually, until ended by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4657, "fingerprint": "2016|201600370|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600370|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "05f141d57a8b5904", "measure_id": "201600370", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance known as the MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AND CULTIVATION TAX, estimated to annually collect $875,000 - $1,200,000 from marijuana dispensaries (through a maximum tax rate of ten cents for each $1 of dispensary proceeds), estimated to annually collect another $100,000 - $1,000,000 from marijuana cultivation (if cultivaton is allowed, through an annual maximum tax rate of $25 per square foot of cultivation area, subject to CPI adjustments), with no sunset clause, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10913, "no_votes": 4703, "total_votes": 15616, "percent_yes": 69.88345286885246, "percent_no": 30.11654713114754, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.384205", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.756165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance known as the MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AND CULTIVATION TAX, estimated to annually collect $875,000 - $1,200,000 from marijuana dispensaries (through a maximum tax rate of ten cents for each $1 of dispensary proceeds), estimated to annually collect another $100,000 - $1,000,000 from marijuana cultivation (if cultivaton is allowed, through an annual maximum tax rate of $25 per square foot of cultivation area, subject to CPI adjustments), with no sunset clause, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4667, "fingerprint": "2016|201600380|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600380|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "80f97bec97cabad2", "measure_id": "201600380", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance known as the MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY REGULATORY PROGRAM, which will regulate and authorize medical marijuana dispensaries through a permitting process; require security cameras, inspections, odor control, record keeping, employee background checks; limit locations to 600 feet from schools, residences, parks in only industrial or commercial zones; prohibit cultivation at dispensaries; be effective only if marijuana tax is approved; apply to recreational marijuana if allowed by state and local law, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12148, "no_votes": 3565, "total_votes": 15713, "percent_yes": 77.31178005473176, "percent_no": 22.688219945268244, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.387129", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.758462", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance known as the MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY REGULATORY PROGRAM, which will regulate and authorize medical marijuana dispensaries through a permitting process; require security cameras, inspections, odor control, record keeping, employee background checks; limit locations to 600 feet from schools, residences, parks in only industrial or commercial zones; prohibit cultivation at dispensaries; be effective only if marijuana tax is approved; apply to recreational marijuana if allowed by state and local law, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4655, "fingerprint": "2016|201600368|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600368|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "432f99f807c95ea1", "measure_id": "201600368", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain community safety/quality neighborhoods by retaining police, firefighters, youth/senior services, drug/gang prevention, library, parks, street maintenance/other city services; shall an ordinance be adopted updating Moreno Valley's existing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 8% to 13%, paid only by overnight hotel/lodging guests, providing $650,000 annually, that can only be ended by voters; requiring independent audits, financial oversight committee and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37005, "no_votes": 14471, "total_votes": 51476, "percent_yes": 71.88787007537492, "percent_no": 28.11212992462508, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.383662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.755733", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain community safety/quality neighborhoods by retaining police, firefighters, youth/senior services, drug/gang prevention, library, parks, street maintenance/other city services; shall an ordinance be adopted updating Moreno Valley's existing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 8% to 13%, paid only by overnight hotel/lodging guests, providing $650,000 annually, that can only be ended by voters; requiring independent audits, financial oversight committee and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4669, "fingerprint": "2016|201600727|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600727|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "dd21886a59182ad4", "measure_id": "201600727", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, construct, acquire, and equip classrooms and other educational facilities, including career technical education; and to reduce borrowing costs, shall $25.5 million of Banning Unified School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through the issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, rates below legal limits, no funds for administrator salaries, independent citizen oversight, annual audits, all funds spent on local schools and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6818, "no_votes": 3478, "total_votes": 10296, "percent_yes": 66.21989121989122, "percent_no": 33.780108780108776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.387694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.758856", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, construct, acquire, and equip classrooms and other educational facilities, including career technical education; and to reduce borrowing costs, shall $25.5 million of Banning Unified School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through the issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, rates below legal limits, no funds for administrator salaries, independent citizen oversight, annual audits, all funds spent on local schools and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4663, "fingerprint": "2016|201600376|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600376|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ce76b5f7ca342d19", "measure_id": "201600376", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of Corona be elected by districts as described in Ordinance No. 3236?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30192, "no_votes": 13894, "total_votes": 44086, "percent_yes": 68.48432608991517, "percent_no": 31.51567391008483, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.386002", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.757546", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of Corona be elected by districts as described in Ordinance No. 3236?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4673, "fingerprint": "2016|201600732|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600732|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "0e41fe4275f6116d", "measure_id": "201600732", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade Riverside schools, including deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, improve student safety, security, and seismic safety, upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities, computer systems and instructional technology to support student achievement in math, science, engineering and skilled trades, and construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, shall Riverside Unified School District issue $392 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57347, "no_votes": 24064, "total_votes": 81411, "percent_yes": 70.44134085074498, "percent_no": 29.55865914925502, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.388843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.759583", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade Riverside schools, including deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, improve student safety, security, and seismic safety, upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities, computer systems and instructional technology to support student achievement in math, science, engineering and skilled trades, and construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, shall Riverside Unified School District issue $392 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4648, "fingerprint": "2016|201600361|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600361|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7c519560363f996b", "measure_id": "201600361", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help fund municipal services, including police protection and crime suppression services, fire prevention and suppression services, emergency medical services, park, recreation, and library facilities and services, shall an ordinance amending the existing cannabis tax be adopted that would expand the tax to apply to recreational cannabis, if legalized, and apply a tax of $25 per square foot of cultivation space, and $1.00 for every gram of cannabis concentrate and every unit of cannabis-infused product?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10605, "no_votes": 3301, "total_votes": 13906, "percent_yes": 76.26204516036243, "percent_no": 23.737954839637567, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.381523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.754256", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help fund municipal services, including police protection and crime suppression services, fire prevention and suppression services, emergency medical services, park, recreation, and library facilities and services, shall an ordinance amending the existing cannabis tax be adopted that would expand the tax to apply to recreational cannabis, if legalized, and apply a tax of $25 per square foot of cultivation space, and $1.00 for every gram of cannabis concentrate and every unit of cannabis-infused product?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4671, "fingerprint": "2016|201600730|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600730|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1afe19d21b4acde0", "measure_id": "201600730", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire land and build two new elementary schools and one middle school to reduce overcrowding at existing schools; repair and renovate Menifee Valley Middle School and existing elementary/ middle schools; fix roofs, heating, air conditioning, plumbing and electrical systems; and improve access for students with disabilities; shall the K-8 Menifee Union School District issue $135,000,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all money staying in Menifee Union School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19772, "no_votes": 12304, "total_votes": 32076, "percent_yes": 61.641102381843126, "percent_no": 38.358897618156874, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.388253", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.759218", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire land and build two new elementary schools and one middle school to reduce overcrowding at existing schools; repair and renovate Menifee Valley Middle School and existing elementary/ middle schools; fix roofs, heating, air conditioning, plumbing and electrical systems; and improve access for students with disabilities; shall the K-8 Menifee Union School District issue $135,000,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all money staying in Menifee Union School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4661, "fingerprint": "2016|201600374|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600374|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8614bbe096ff4729", "measure_id": "201600374", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, prevent cuts to local paramedic/police/fire protection, school safety patrols, youth/after-school, senior, disabled services; improve freeway interchanges/reduce traffic; other general services; shall Ordinance 2016-06 of the City of Temecula be adopted establishing a one-cent sales tax providing $23,000,000 dollars annually, until ended by voters; requiring independent audits, no money for the State, all funds remaining local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19711, "no_votes": 18935, "total_votes": 38646, "percent_yes": 51.00398488847488, "percent_no": 48.99601511152512, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.385336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.757090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, prevent cuts to local paramedic/police/fire protection, school safety patrols, youth/after-school, senior, disabled services; improve freeway interchanges/reduce traffic; other general services; shall Ordinance 2016-06 of the City of Temecula be adopted establishing a one-cent sales tax providing $23,000,000 dollars annually, until ended by voters; requiring independent audits, no money for the State, all funds remaining local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4656, "fingerprint": "2016|201600369|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600369|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "dc5270823cbc078c", "measure_id": "201600369", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain 9-1-1 emergency medical/police/fire response; Palm Desert's long-term financial stability; neighborhood policing/crime prevention; water conservation; street repairs and other vital services, shall an ordinance increasing Palm Desert's short-term general rental tax from 9% to 11%, paid only by hotel guests/short-term renters, generating approximately $2,200,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, public oversight, and local control of funds be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14346, "no_votes": 5041, "total_votes": 19387, "percent_yes": 73.99803992366019, "percent_no": 26.001960076339813, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.383929", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.755945", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain 9-1-1 emergency medical/police/fire response; Palm Desert's long-term financial stability; neighborhood policing/crime prevention; water conservation; street repairs and other vital services, shall an ordinance increasing Palm Desert's short-term general rental tax from 9% to 11%, paid only by hotel guests/short-term renters, generating approximately $2,200,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, public oversight, and local control of funds be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4650, "fingerprint": "2016|201600363|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600363|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "6edec9de6c6e52d7", "measure_id": "201600363", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To pay for police protection and crime prevention services, fire prevention and suppression services, 9-1-1 / paramedic services, other general municipal services and lawful public purposes of the City, shall the City of Hemet establish a 1% sales tax (1 cent) for 10 years only, providing $10,000,000 annually, requiring citizen oversight committee, annual audits, and all funds remaining local?[", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15744, "no_votes": 10056, "total_votes": 25800, "percent_yes": 61.02325581395349, "percent_no": 38.97674418604651, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.382128", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.754681", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To pay for police protection and crime prevention services, fire prevention and suppression services, 9-1-1 / paramedic services, other general municipal services and lawful public purposes of the City, shall the City of Hemet establish a 1% sales tax (1 cent) for 10 years only, providing $10,000,000 annually, requiring citizen oversight committee, annual audits, and all funds remaining local?[", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4670, "fingerprint": "2016|201600729|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600729|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4ab9bd03abfe5a3b", "measure_id": "201600729", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide classrooms, labs, equipment for career education to prepare local students for college and skilled careers; upgrade school facilities and instructional technology to support advanced math and science, and keep pace with technology; improve school safety/security; and add classrooms/school facilities to reduce overcrowding at existing schools, shall Lake Elsinore Unified School District issue 105 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24845, "no_votes": 12383, "total_votes": 37228, "percent_yes": 66.73740195551736, "percent_no": 33.262598044482644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.387988", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.759037", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide classrooms, labs, equipment for career education to prepare local students for college and skilled careers; upgrade school facilities and instructional technology to support advanced math and science, and keep pace with technology; improve school safety/security; and add classrooms/school facilities to reduce overcrowding at existing schools, shall Lake Elsinore Unified School District issue 105 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4652, "fingerprint": "2016|201600365|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600365|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ffe5571545e01b8a", "measure_id": "201600365", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times; police gang/drug enforcement programs; increase police patrols of neighborhoods/parks/schools; improve water quality/delivery by upgrading pipes/infrastructure; fix potholes; and other city services, shall Indio adopt an ordinance to enact a one cent sales tax, for 20 years, providing $8,500,000 annually, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, all money for Indio, prohibiting state government from taking funds raised?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16578, "no_votes": 6031, "total_votes": 22609, "percent_yes": 73.3247821663939, "percent_no": 26.675217833606098, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.382780", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.755052", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times; police gang/drug enforcement programs; increase police patrols of neighborhoods/parks/schools; improve water quality/delivery by upgrading pipes/infrastructure; fix potholes; and other city services, shall Indio adopt an ordinance to enact a one cent sales tax, for 20 years, providing $8,500,000 annually, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, all money for Indio, prohibiting state government from taking funds raised?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4674, "fingerprint": "2016|201600733|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600733|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a27d39c08269a6aa", "measure_id": "201600733", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade local classrooms, science labs and technology infrastructure that prepare students for college/careers; repair aging roofs, plumbing and electrical systems; improve school safety/security; and acquire, renovate, construct and equip classrooms, sites and facilities to reduce overcrowding and support student instruction in reading, math, science, engineering and technology; shall San Jacinto Unified School District issue $44,900,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8439, "no_votes": 3134, "total_votes": 11573, "percent_yes": 72.91972695066103, "percent_no": 27.08027304933897, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.389138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.759764", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade local classrooms, science labs and technology infrastructure that prepare students for college/careers; repair aging roofs, plumbing and electrical systems; improve school safety/security; and acquire, renovate, construct and equip classrooms, sites and facilities to reduce overcrowding and support student instruction in reading, math, science, engineering and technology; shall San Jacinto Unified School District issue $44,900,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4658, "fingerprint": "2016|201600371|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600371|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3a3075cab818a10c", "measure_id": "201600371", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent cutting police, firefighters, paramedics, 911 emergency response, antigang/drug programs, homelessness reduction and youth after-school/senior/disabled services; to repair local streets/potholes/infrastructure; and to provide other general services, shall a one-cent transaction and use tax (sales tax) be implemented providing $48,000,000 annually through 2036 unless extended by the voters, requiring independent audits with no funds to Sacramento, all funds remaining for Riverside", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55496, "no_votes": 37555, "total_votes": 93051, "percent_yes": 59.64041224704732, "percent_no": 40.35958775295268, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.384502", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.756398", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent cutting police, firefighters, paramedics, 911 emergency response, antigang/drug programs, homelessness reduction and youth after-school/senior/disabled services; to repair local streets/potholes/infrastructure; and to provide other general services, shall a one-cent transaction and use tax (sales tax) be implemented providing $48,000,000 annually through 2036 unless extended by the voters, requiring independent audits with no funds to Sacramento, all funds remaining for Riverside", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11282, "fingerprint": "2016|201600381|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600381|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "2703167214497095", "measure_id": "201600381", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For a period of five (5) years shall a one-half percent transactions and use tax, to be used solely to fund fire protection needs for the City of Isleton, be adopted", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120, "no_votes": 46, "total_votes": 166, "percent_yes": 72.28915662650603, "percent_no": 27.710843373493972, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.771253", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.389706", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.760129", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For a period of five (5) years shall a one-half percent transactions and use tax, to be used solely to fund fire protection needs for the City of Isleton, be adopted", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4675, "fingerprint": "2016|201600074|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600074|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "274c86885130fb86", "measure_id": "201600074", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To: Fill potholes and repave streets; Repair deteriorating bridges; Relieve traffic on roads and freeways; Build a new expressway between Elk Grove, Rancho Cordova and Folsom; Extend Light Rail toward the Airport and Elk Grove; Support Light Rail and bus operations, maintenance, and security; and Improve bicycle and pedestrian safety; Shall the ordinance enacting a 30-year countywide one half cent sales tax, raising approximately $100 million annually, with independent oversight and audits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 342084, "no_votes": 178543, "total_votes": 520627, "percent_yes": 65.70615815161335, "percent_no": 34.29384184838665, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.389409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.759948", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To: Fill potholes and repave streets; Repair deteriorating bridges; Relieve traffic on roads and freeways; Build a new expressway between Elk Grove, Rancho Cordova and Folsom; Extend Light Rail toward the Airport and Elk Grove; Support Light Rail and bus operations, maintenance, and security; and Improve bicycle and pedestrian safety; Shall the ordinance enacting a 30-year countywide one half cent sales tax, raising approximately $100 million annually, with independent oversight and audits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4679, "fingerprint": "2016|201600385|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600385|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "a2610fc3c570ea67", "measure_id": "201600385", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For a period of five (5) years shall a one-half cent transactions and use tax, to be used solely to fund General City services for the City of Isleton, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 174, "no_votes": 77, "total_votes": 251, "percent_yes": 69.32270916334662, "percent_no": 30.677290836653384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.390846", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.760868", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For a period of five (5) years shall a one-half cent transactions and use tax, to be used solely to fund General City services for the City of Isleton, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4681, "fingerprint": "2016|201600738|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600738|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "143b2669cd0b9c49", "measure_id": "201600738", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade local high schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Roseville Joint Union High School District upgrade science, engineering, math, career technology and core academic classrooms/ facilities, support academic instruction and prepare students for 21st Century jobs, replace electrical wiring, leaky roofs, ensure classroom accessibility, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, schools, sites/ equipment, by issuing $96,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4471, "no_votes": 2390, "total_votes": 6861, "percent_yes": 65.16542778020697, "percent_no": 34.83457221979303, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.391396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.761235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade local high schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Roseville Joint Union High School District upgrade science, engineering, math, career technology and core academic classrooms/ facilities, support academic instruction and prepare students for 21st Century jobs, replace electrical wiring, leaky roofs, ensure classroom accessibility, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, schools, sites/ equipment, by issuing $96,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4685, "fingerprint": "2016|201600737|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600737|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "3f4f29fc334db8f0", "measure_id": "201600737", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at local high schools; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace leaky roofs; provide career technical education classrooms for job training; renovate deteriorating plumbing/sewer systems;\r\nupgrade inadequate electrical systems; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements shall Galt Joint Union High School District issue $36,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with an independent oversight committee, NO money for administrative salaries, all funds locally-controlled and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7795, "no_votes": 4055, "total_votes": 11850, "percent_yes": 65.78059071729957, "percent_no": 34.219409282700425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.392641", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.761988", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at local high schools; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace leaky roofs; provide career technical education classrooms for job training; renovate deteriorating plumbing/sewer systems;\r\nupgrade inadequate electrical systems; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements shall Galt Joint Union High School District issue $36,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with an independent oversight committee, NO money for administrative salaries, all funds locally-controlled and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4682, "fingerprint": "2016|201600734|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600734|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "8c0a836f7874f2b0", "measure_id": "201600734", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To expand successful programs that provide early intervention and tutoring services for students at risk of falling behind or dropping out, to support academic and arts enrichment, to provide specialized training for teachers, counselors and other school personnel, shall the Sacramento City Unified School District implement a $75 parcel tax for six years, with an exemption for seniors, and create a Citizens Oversight Committee to ensure all funds benefit children most in need?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78785, "no_votes": 40279, "total_votes": 119064, "percent_yes": 66.17029496741247, "percent_no": 33.829705032587526, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.391666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.761424", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand successful programs that provide early intervention and tutoring services for students at risk of falling behind or dropping out, to support academic and arts enrichment, to provide specialized training for teachers, counselors and other school personnel, shall the Sacramento City Unified School District implement a $75 parcel tax for six years, with an exemption for seniors, and create a Citizens Oversight Committee to ensure all funds benefit children most in need?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4684, "fingerprint": "2016|201600736|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600736|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "6ed8c62805cf30fb", "measure_id": "201600736", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for pre-kindergarten through eighth grade students shall Galt Joint Union Elementary School District be authorized to modernize and upgrade classrooms and school facilities for 21st Century learning; replace portables and leaky roofs; upgrade outdated electrical, heating/air conditioning and plumbing; make safety/security and technology classroom improvements, by issuing $19,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and audits, NO money for employee salaries, and all funds benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6554, "no_votes": 3245, "total_votes": 9799, "percent_yes": 66.88437595673028, "percent_no": 33.11562404326972, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.392271", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.761798", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for pre-kindergarten through eighth grade students shall Galt Joint Union Elementary School District be authorized to modernize and upgrade classrooms and school facilities for 21st Century learning; replace portables and leaky roofs; upgrade outdated electrical, heating/air conditioning and plumbing; make safety/security and technology classroom improvements, by issuing $19,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and audits, NO money for employee salaries, and all funds benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4680, "fingerprint": "2016|201600386|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600386|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "cfaf46185e46806a", "measure_id": "201600386", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Sacramento Charter be amended to establish a redistricting commission that is independent of the city council and that has sole authority for establishing council districts, and to establish processes for selection of commission members and for the commission\u2019s adoption of council district maps?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76197, "no_votes": 68087, "total_votes": 144284, "percent_yes": 52.81042943084472, "percent_no": 47.18957056915528, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.391126", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.761048", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Sacramento Charter be amended to establish a redistricting commission that is independent of the city council and that has sole authority for establishing council districts, and to establish processes for selection of commission members and for the commission\u2019s adoption of council district maps?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4683, "fingerprint": "2016|201600735|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600735|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "5a3cfc8617e18c5e", "measure_id": "201600735", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize classrooms, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and HVAC systems, improve student safety and campus security, construct and upgrade additional classrooms, labs, career technical education facilities and instructional technology to support student achievement in math, science, arts and skilled trades and keep up with growth and relieve overcrowding shall the Elk Grove Unified School District issue $476,000,000 in bonds to be spent only on specified projects, with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78517, "no_votes": 33368, "total_votes": 111885, "percent_yes": 70.17652053447736, "percent_no": 29.823479465522638, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.391942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.761612", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize classrooms, fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and HVAC systems, improve student safety and campus security, construct and upgrade additional classrooms, labs, career technical education facilities and instructional technology to support student achievement in math, science, arts and skilled trades and keep up with growth and relieve overcrowding shall the Elk Grove Unified School District issue $476,000,000 in bonds to be spent only on specified projects, with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4686, "fingerprint": "2016|201600739|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600739|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "6445418060411633", "measure_id": "201600739", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade all schools by: repairing aging/deteriorating classrooms/bathrooms/leaky roofs/plumbing/drinking fountains/water pipes/electrical wiring; upgrading classroom technology, math/science/computer labs, vocational education classrooms, and outdated fire safety/security systems; removing asbestos/lead paint; and, repairing, constructing, and acquiring educational facilities/equipment, shall San Juan Unified School District issue $750,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring annual independent financial audits, citizens oversight, and keeping all funds local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95406, "no_votes": 41964, "total_votes": 137370, "percent_yes": 69.45184538108758, "percent_no": 30.54815461891242, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.392909", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.762170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade all schools by: repairing aging/deteriorating classrooms/bathrooms/leaky roofs/plumbing/drinking fountains/water pipes/electrical wiring; upgrading classroom technology, math/science/computer labs, vocational education classrooms, and outdated fire safety/security systems; removing asbestos/lead paint; and, repairing, constructing, and acquiring educational facilities/equipment, shall San Juan Unified School District issue $750,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring annual independent financial audits, citizens oversight, and keeping all funds local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4676, "fingerprint": "2016|201600382|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600382|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "14f6fcc2ea289b77", "measure_id": "201600382", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain/improve Police, Fire, and Paramedic/911 Emergency services, the number of police officers/firefighters, rapid response to gang violence, tracking of sex offenders/parolees; and, restore anti-gang/anti-drug units, shall the City of Hemet establish a 1\u00a0% sales tax (1 cent) for 10 years only, providing $10,000,000 annually, with annual audits, and all funds required by law to be used in Hemet for police/fire services only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 81197, "no_votes": 21422, "total_votes": 102619, "percent_yes": 79.12472349175104, "percent_no": 20.87527650824896, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.389987", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.760310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/improve Police, Fire, and Paramedic/911 Emergency services, the number of police officers/firefighters, rapid response to gang violence, tracking of sex offenders/parolees; and, restore anti-gang/anti-drug units, shall the City of Hemet establish a 1\u00a0% sales tax (1 cent) for 10 years only, providing $10,000,000 annually, with annual audits, and all funds required by law to be used in Hemet for police/fire services only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4677, "fingerprint": "2016|201600383|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600383|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "fd09708b0c24fb8a", "measure_id": "201600383", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To create a funding source dedicated to children and youth services, including homeless and foster youth, shall a 5% business operations tax on gross receipts of marijuana cultivation and manufacturing businesses be imposed, generating revenues potentially in the millions of dollars annually, to be used for children and youth services in the City of Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64394, "no_votes": 33378, "total_votes": 97772, "percent_yes": 65.86139180951601, "percent_no": 34.13860819048399, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.390255", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.760509", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To create a funding source dedicated to children and youth services, including homeless and foster youth, shall a 5% business operations tax on gross receipts of marijuana cultivation and manufacturing businesses be imposed, generating revenues potentially in the millions of dollars annually, to be used for children and youth services in the City of Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4678, "fingerprint": "2016|201600384|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600384|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "1e881a725a866709", "measure_id": "201600384", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Sacramento Charter section 153, relating to the day on which elected officials take office, be amended so that elected officials take office on the day of the last regularly scheduled city council meeting in December of the year of their election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 67955, "no_votes": 25305, "total_votes": 93260, "percent_yes": 72.86618057044821, "percent_no": 27.133819429551792, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.390582", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.760689", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Sacramento Charter section 153, relating to the day on which elected officials take office, be amended so that elected officials take office on the day of the last regularly scheduled city council meeting in December of the year of their election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4687, "fingerprint": "2016|201600075|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600075|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "fc9d69ff123ea1df", "measure_id": "201600075", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the voters authorize implementing the San Benito County Transportation Safety and Investment Plan to: (1) Repair and maintain roads; (2) Improve safety and relieve congestion on Highway 25; (3)  Improve safety and traffic flow on local roads; (4) Increase bicycle and pedestrian safety; and (5) Improve transit services for youth, seniors, and people with disabilities by enacting a half cent sales tax, raising approximately $8 million annually over 30 years, with annual audits by an independent oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7861, "no_votes": 5292, "total_votes": 13153, "percent_yes": 59.76583288983501, "percent_no": 40.23416711016499, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.393241", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.762354", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters authorize implementing the San Benito County Transportation Safety and Investment Plan to: (1) Repair and maintain roads; (2) Improve safety and relieve congestion on Highway 25; (3)  Improve safety and traffic flow on local roads; (4) Increase bicycle and pedestrian safety; and (5) Improve transit services for youth, seniors, and people with disabilities by enacting a half cent sales tax, raising approximately $8 million annually over 30 years, with annual audits by an independent oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4690, "fingerprint": "2016|201600740|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600740|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "607d58ecd8c86a83", "measure_id": "201600740", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by upgrading aging classrooms, technology/science labs, repairing outdated, deteriorating wiring, sewer lines, improving campus safety, handicapped accessibility, increasing water conservation/energy efficiency, and acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no funding administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, requiring independent audits, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 235, "no_votes": 174, "total_votes": 409, "percent_yes": 57.45721271393644, "percent_no": 42.54278728606356, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.394095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.762906", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by upgrading aging classrooms, technology/science labs, repairing outdated, deteriorating wiring, sewer lines, improving campus safety, handicapped accessibility, increasing water conservation/energy efficiency, and acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no funding administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, requiring independent audits, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4689, "fingerprint": "2016|201600741|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600741|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "5f14694403e0d644", "measure_id": "201600741", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state: construct, renovate, and upgrade classrooms and school buildings; provide facilities for job training/career technical education; replace deteriorating plumbing and outdated HVAC systems; repair/replace leaky roofs; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Coalinga-Huron Joint Unified School District issue $39,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizen's oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10803, "no_votes": 10597, "total_votes": 21400, "percent_yes": 50.48130841121496, "percent_no": 49.51869158878504, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.393773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.762721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state: construct, renovate, and upgrade classrooms and school buildings; provide facilities for job training/career technical education; replace deteriorating plumbing and outdated HVAC systems; repair/replace leaky roofs; and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Coalinga-Huron Joint Unified School District issue $39,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizen's oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4691, "fingerprint": "2016|201600742|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600742|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "ee4f1cbabe109627", "measure_id": "201600742", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade classrooms, expand local access to higher education/ training for high-wage jobs, including nursing, agriculture, science, technology/ engineering, by upgrading aging classrooms, technology, science labs, repairing outdated, deteriorating mechanical/electrical systems, improving veterans\u2019 services, safety, security/ disabled access, removing asbestos, acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Hartnell Community College District issue $167,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23, "no_votes": 39, "total_votes": 62, "percent_yes": 37.096774193548384, "percent_no": 62.903225806451616, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.394428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.763179", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade classrooms, expand local access to higher education/ training for high-wage jobs, including nursing, agriculture, science, technology/ engineering, by upgrading aging classrooms, technology, science labs, repairing outdated, deteriorating mechanical/electrical systems, improving veterans\u2019 services, safety, security/ disabled access, removing asbestos, acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Hartnell Community College District issue $167,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4693, "fingerprint": "2016|201600744|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600744|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "224beee638376a43", "measure_id": "201600744", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local high school education by upgrading science labs and classrooms to help prepare students for college and careers; continue improving school access for students with disabilities; adding classrooms and school facilities to reduce\r\novercrowding; upgrading aging student facilities; and improving school and earthquake safety, shall the San Benito High School District issue $60 million in bonds, with citizen oversight, annual audits and with NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11864, "no_votes": 6718, "total_votes": 18582, "percent_yes": 63.84673339791196, "percent_no": 36.15326660208804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.395002", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.763562", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local high school education by upgrading science labs and classrooms to help prepare students for college and careers; continue improving school access for students with disabilities; adding classrooms and school facilities to reduce\r\novercrowding; upgrading aging student facilities; and improving school and earthquake safety, shall the San Benito High School District issue $60 million in bonds, with citizen oversight, annual audits and with NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4692, "fingerprint": "2016|201600743|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600743|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "91fa46722c7bcc70", "measure_id": "201600743", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve conditions, reduce classroom overcrowding, accommodate growing student enrollment in all elementary and middle schools, keep neighborhood schools small and well-maintained by building a new school and continuing to improve school safety, security and technology, maximize energy efficiency, and acquiring, constructing or equipping classrooms, facilities and sites, shall the Hollister School District issue $36,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9987, "no_votes": 5374, "total_votes": 15361, "percent_yes": 65.01529848317166, "percent_no": 34.98470151682834, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.394722", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.763371", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve conditions, reduce classroom overcrowding, accommodate growing student enrollment in all elementary and middle schools, keep neighborhood schools small and well-maintained by building a new school and continuing to improve school safety, security and technology, maximize energy efficiency, and acquiring, constructing or equipping classrooms, facilities and sites, shall the Hollister School District issue $36,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4688, "fingerprint": "2016|201600387|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600387|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "13fc36a9c776cec8", "measure_id": "201600387", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To keep Hollister safe by: maintaining Hollister's public safety services, rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times, operations at all current fire stations, neighborhood police patrols, parks/recreation programs and other City services, shall the City of Hollister continue the existing voter-approved one-cent sales tax for 20 years providing $4,500,000 annually, requiring citizens' oversight, annual audits, all funds for Hollister, with no increase in tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9600, "no_votes": 2570, "total_votes": 12170, "percent_yes": 78.88249794576828, "percent_no": 21.11750205423172, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.393506", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.762537", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep Hollister safe by: maintaining Hollister's public safety services, rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times, operations at all current fire stations, neighborhood police patrols, parks/recreation programs and other City services, shall the City of Hollister continue the existing voter-approved one-cent sales tax for 20 years providing $4,500,000 annually, requiring citizens' oversight, annual audits, all funds for Hollister, with no increase in tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11283, "fingerprint": "2016|201600745|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600745|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "dec87ef3924cbd27", "measure_id": "201600745", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Dawn Turnbull be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 424, "no_votes": 133, "total_votes": 557, "percent_yes": 76.12208258527828, "percent_no": 23.877917414721722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-02-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.778926", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.400977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.767388", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Dawn Turnbull be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4695, "fingerprint": "2016|201600077|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600077|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b2cd281de8e11ece", "measure_id": "201600077", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall GEOFFREY BERNER be recalled (removed) from the office of Director?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 171, "no_votes": 109, "total_votes": 280, "percent_yes": 61.07142857142858, "percent_no": 38.92857142857142, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.395535", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.763928", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall GEOFFREY BERNER be recalled (removed) from the office of Director?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4696, "fingerprint": "2016|201600078|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600078|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "30843bb827229817", "measure_id": "201600078", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall ROBERT W. SMITH be recalled (removed) from the office of Director?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 179, "no_votes": 107, "total_votes": 286, "percent_yes": 62.58741258741259, "percent_no": 37.41258741258741, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.395868", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.764107", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ROBERT W. SMITH be recalled (removed) from the office of Director?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4697, "fingerprint": "2016|201600388|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600388|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "43a3080f2df56e88", "measure_id": "201600388", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To add approximately $4,800,000 in funding annually for general city services such as police, fire, paramedics, parks, libraries and senior services while stabilizing electric utility rates; shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a transfer not to exceed 20% of annual electric utility gross revenues to the City\u2019s General Fund reverting back to a 12.39% maximum on June 30, 2021, and establishing a freeze on electric utility rates for 5 years, except in cases of financial emergency?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5161, "no_votes": 1612, "total_votes": 6773, "percent_yes": 76.1996161228407, "percent_no": 23.800383877159305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.396142", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.764288", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To add approximately $4,800,000 in funding annually for general city services such as police, fire, paramedics, parks, libraries and senior services while stabilizing electric utility rates; shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a transfer not to exceed 20% of annual electric utility gross revenues to the City\u2019s General Fund reverting back to a 12.39% maximum on June 30, 2021, and establishing a freeze on electric utility rates for 5 years, except in cases of financial emergency?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4694, "fingerprint": "2016|201600076|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600076|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "72476f9c1aedb153", "measure_id": "201600076", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Morongo Valley Fire and Rescue Assessment be converted into a special parcel tax of $350 per year, adjusted for inflation, to use in funding fire protection and paramedic services provided by the Morongo Valley Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 425, "no_votes": 651, "total_votes": 1076, "percent_yes": 39.498141263940525, "percent_no": 60.501858736059475, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.395267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.763747", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Morongo Valley Fire and Rescue Assessment be converted into a special parcel tax of $350 per year, adjusted for inflation, to use in funding fire protection and paramedic services provided by the Morongo Valley Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4715, "fingerprint": "2016|201600747|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600747|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "cbf18bdc501dc5e0", "measure_id": "201600747", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms, restrooms/fix leaky roofs in order to maintain health/safety, retain/attract quality teachers, remove asbestos/lead paint, upgrade security, outdated plumbing/electrical systems/gas lines, improve technology, computer/science labs, repair, construct, acquire school facilities, sites/equipment, shall Barstow Unified School District issue $39,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring audits, citizen's oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5776, "no_votes": 2776, "total_votes": 8552, "percent_yes": 67.53975678203929, "percent_no": 32.46024321796071, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.401517", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.767755", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade aging classrooms, restrooms/fix leaky roofs in order to maintain health/safety, retain/attract quality teachers, remove asbestos/lead paint, upgrade security, outdated plumbing/electrical systems/gas lines, improve technology, computer/science labs, repair, construct, acquire school facilities, sites/equipment, shall Barstow Unified School District issue $39,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring audits, citizen's oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4716, "fingerprint": "2016|201600748|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600748|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "9dcbad5b50f0fd08", "measure_id": "201600748", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade neighborhood schools and retain/attract quality teachers by repairing deteriorating classrooms/restrooms; replacing deteriorating, rusty pipes/ensuring safe drinking water; removing asbestos/lead paint; upgrading fire safety, science/computer labs, wiring, classroom technology; repairing, constructing, acquiring educational facilities, sites, equipment; shall Chino Valley Unified School District issue $750,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, requiring annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no\r\nmoney for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34168, "no_votes": 26861, "total_votes": 61029, "percent_yes": 55.98649822215668, "percent_no": 44.01350177784332, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.401823", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.767942", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade neighborhood schools and retain/attract quality teachers by repairing deteriorating classrooms/restrooms; replacing deteriorating, rusty pipes/ensuring safe drinking water; removing asbestos/lead paint; upgrading fire safety, science/computer labs, wiring, classroom technology; repairing, constructing, acquiring educational facilities, sites, equipment; shall Chino Valley Unified School District issue $750,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, requiring annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no\r\nmoney for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4714, "fingerprint": "2016|201600746|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600746|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "000348db775a294e", "measure_id": "201600746", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to replace or repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical and air conditioning systems; improve access for students and families with disabilities; improve school safety and security systems; update and modernize classrooms to keep pace with educational technology and support student programs in science, technology, English, arts, and math, shall the Alta Loma School\r\nDistrict issue $58,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all money staying in Alta Loma?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13495, "no_votes": 11029, "total_votes": 24524, "percent_yes": 55.02772793997717, "percent_no": 44.97227206002283, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.401252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.767572", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to replace or repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical and air conditioning systems; improve access for students and families with disabilities; improve school safety and security systems; update and modernize classrooms to keep pace with educational technology and support student programs in science, technology, English, arts, and math, shall the Alta Loma School\r\nDistrict issue $58,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all money staying in Alta Loma?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4717, "fingerprint": "2016|201600749|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600749|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "03773126c0b02b67", "measure_id": "201600749", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade neighborhood schools, meet safety, academic, technology standards and reduce overcrowding by improving school security, including 9- 1-1 emergency communications, cameras, wiring, smoke alarms/door locks; upgrading classroom computers, water pipes, labs/libraries; acquiring, constructing, equipping and repairing classrooms/sites/facilities, shall Etiwanda School District issue $137,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrator salaries/pensions and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21387, "no_votes": 11427, "total_votes": 32814, "percent_yes": 65.17644907661364, "percent_no": 34.823550923386364, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.402157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.768133", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade neighborhood schools, meet safety, academic, technology standards and reduce overcrowding by improving school security, including 9- 1-1 emergency communications, cameras, wiring, smoke alarms/door locks; upgrading classroom computers, water pipes, labs/libraries; acquiring, constructing, equipping and repairing classrooms/sites/facilities, shall Etiwanda School District issue $137,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrator salaries/pensions and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4712, "fingerprint": "2016|201600750|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600750|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "97bef53942161986", "measure_id": "201600750", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms to prepare students/veterans for good-paying jobs/university transfer by updating labs/classrooms for nursing, welding, construction/high-tech job training, repairing deteriorating gas, electrical/sewer lines, leaky roofs, improving water conservation, ensuring access for disabled, including veterans, repairing, constructing/acquiring facilities, sites/equipment, shall Kern Community College District issue $502,821,000 in bonds at legal rates, funds spent locally, with citizen oversight/independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 386, "no_votes": 210, "total_votes": 596, "percent_yes": 64.76510067114094, "percent_no": 35.23489932885906, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.400411", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.767026", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms to prepare students/veterans for good-paying jobs/university transfer by updating labs/classrooms for nursing, welding, construction/high-tech job training, repairing deteriorating gas, electrical/sewer lines, leaky roofs, improving water conservation, ensuring access for disabled, including veterans, repairing, constructing/acquiring facilities, sites/equipment, shall Kern Community College District issue $502,821,000 in bonds at legal rates, funds spent locally, with citizen oversight/independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4718, "fingerprint": "2016|201600752|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600752|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f3ffe5c94ac0b8c0", "measure_id": "201600752", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging classrooms in order to maintain student health/safety and retain/attract quality teachers, remove asbestos/lead paint, repair restrooms/leaky, deteriorating roofs, upgrade disabled access, school security/fire safety, increase water conservation/energy efficiency, improve technology/computer/science labs, repair, construct, acquire/retrofit school facilities, sites/equipment, shall Ontario-Montclair School District issue $150,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, keeping all funds local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30996, "no_votes": 8644, "total_votes": 39640, "percent_yes": 78.19374369323914, "percent_no": 21.806256306760858, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.402458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.768326", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging classrooms in order to maintain student health/safety and retain/attract quality teachers, remove asbestos/lead paint, repair restrooms/leaky, deteriorating roofs, upgrade disabled access, school security/fire safety, increase water conservation/energy efficiency, improve technology/computer/science labs, repair, construct, acquire/retrofit school facilities, sites/equipment, shall Ontario-Montclair School District issue $150,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, keeping all funds local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4704, "fingerprint": "2016|201600395|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600395|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4eb2d775896f7d5b", "measure_id": "201600395", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of San Bernardino adopt the new Charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27478, "no_votes": 17890, "total_votes": 45368, "percent_yes": 60.56691941456533, "percent_no": 39.43308058543467, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.398087", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.765574", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of San Bernardino adopt the new Charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4713, "fingerprint": "2016|201600751|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600751|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "de5cec596de69bb2", "measure_id": "201600751", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade facilities at Boron Schools, improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, replace leaky roofs, modernize/construct/renovate outdated classtooms, restrooms, and other school facilities, replace heating/air conditioning systems, make health and safety improvements, and improve student access to modern technology, shall the Muroc Joint Unified School District issue $21,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money usd for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6, "no_votes": 4, "total_votes": 10, "percent_yes": 60.0, "percent_no": 40.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.400711", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.767206", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade facilities at Boron Schools, improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, replace leaky roofs, modernize/construct/renovate outdated classtooms, restrooms, and other school facilities, replace heating/air conditioning systems, make health and safety improvements, and improve student access to modern technology, shall the Muroc Joint Unified School District issue $21,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money usd for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4708, "fingerprint": "2016|201600399|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600399|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "20ae715907d49d43", "measure_id": "201600399", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the San Bernardino Medical Cannabis Restrictions and Limitations Act be enacted in the City of San Bernardino?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24048, "no_votes": 23015, "total_votes": 47063, "percent_yes": 51.097465099972375, "percent_no": 48.902534900027625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.399276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.766301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Bernardino Medical Cannabis Restrictions and Limitations Act be enacted in the City of San Bernardino?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4709, "fingerprint": "2016|201600400|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600400|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4df8c7f84c705eba", "measure_id": "201600400", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the San Bernardion Regulate Marijuana Act of 2016 be enacted in the City of San Bernardino?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26037, "no_votes": 21196, "total_votes": 47233, "percent_yes": 55.1245950924142, "percent_no": 44.8754049075858, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.399552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.766481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Bernardion Regulate Marijuana Act of 2016 be enacted in the City of San Bernardino?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4710, "fingerprint": "2016|201600401|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600401|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "10ea1751d09a1f9c", "measure_id": "201600401", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall San Bernardino Municipal Code Chapter 5.05 and Section 19.06.026, which prohibit the sale, possession, cultivation, use, and/or distribution of marijuana be replaced and repealed and allow the City of San Bernardino to regulate commercial marijuana activity?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23106, "no_votes": 24583, "total_votes": 47689, "percent_yes": 48.451424856885225, "percent_no": 51.548575143114775, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.399843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.766664", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall San Bernardino Municipal Code Chapter 5.05 and Section 19.06.026, which prohibit the sale, possession, cultivation, use, and/or distribution of marijuana be replaced and repealed and allow the City of San Bernardino to regulate commercial marijuana activity?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4707, "fingerprint": "2016|201600398|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600398|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "86f4596c5a20d296", "measure_id": "201600398", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall four members of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga be elected by geographic districts with the Mayor elected at large as described in Ordinance No.887?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37475, "no_votes": 21381, "total_votes": 58856, "percent_yes": 63.6723528612206, "percent_no": 36.3276471387794, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.399000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.766121", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall four members of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga be elected by geographic districts with the Mayor elected at large as described in Ordinance No.887?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4698, "fingerprint": "2016|201600389|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600389|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1ec48bf47d9c4ee4", "measure_id": "201600389", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Adelanto City Council be authorized to impose excise taxes in the amount of not more than five percent on each type of commerical marijuana activity in the City of Adelanto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4031, "no_votes": 1920, "total_votes": 5951, "percent_yes": 67.73651487145018, "percent_no": 32.26348512854982, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.396410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.764477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Adelanto City Council be authorized to impose excise taxes in the amount of not more than five percent on each type of commerical marijuana activity in the City of Adelanto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4699, "fingerprint": "2016|201600390|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600390|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "03ed91cef64f98de", "measure_id": "201600390", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Adelanto City Council be authorized to impose a tax on each business licensed or operating within the City in the amount of not more than 0.05 percent of the gross revenue attributable to that business's revenue earned from within the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2043, "no_votes": 3896, "total_votes": 5939, "percent_yes": 34.39973059437616, "percent_no": 65.60026940562383, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.396690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.764660", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Adelanto City Council be authorized to impose a tax on each business licensed or operating within the City in the amount of not more than 0.05 percent of the gross revenue attributable to that business's revenue earned from within the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4700, "fingerprint": "2016|201600391|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600391|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d39935c5b92b9b1e", "measure_id": "201600391", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Colton increase the Transient Occupancy (Room) Tax rate from 10% to 12.5%, with the extra 2.5% rate increase generating approximately $150,000 annually that will specifically pay for the construction, maintenance and rehabilitation of the City's athletic/recreational fields and related facilities, until ended by voters, and to apply the Tax to all rent charged by hotel operators, including online travel and short term rental companies, for transient occupancy of any hotel room?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5512, "no_votes": 7142, "total_votes": 12654, "percent_yes": 43.55934882250671, "percent_no": 56.44065117749329, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.396957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.764843", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Colton increase the Transient Occupancy (Room) Tax rate from 10% to 12.5%, with the extra 2.5% rate increase generating approximately $150,000 annually that will specifically pay for the construction, maintenance and rehabilitation of the City's athletic/recreational fields and related facilities, until ended by voters, and to apply the Tax to all rent charged by hotel operators, including online travel and short term rental companies, for transient occupancy of any hotel room?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4711, "fingerprint": "2016|201600402|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600402|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "666733998db67dbc", "measure_id": "201600402", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters approve an ordinance to allow operation of three medical marijuana businesses in the City of Upland?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10745, "no_votes": 19419, "total_votes": 30164, "percent_yes": 35.6219334305795, "percent_no": 64.3780665694205, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.400108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.766847", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters approve an ordinance to allow operation of three medical marijuana businesses in the City of Upland?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4706, "fingerprint": "2016|201600397|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600397|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "66edaa9c7e458a91", "measure_id": "201600397", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring voter approval before the Town of Apple Valley can issue public debt of more than $10,000,000 to pay for acquiring, improving, or financing a project, such as the acquisition of the Town's water system, which is currently owned by a private company, when the debt is to be repaid by feed collected by the Town and not from the Town's taxpayer revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17707, "no_votes": 8466, "total_votes": 26173, "percent_yes": 67.65368891605853, "percent_no": 32.34631108394147, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.398723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.765941", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring voter approval before the Town of Apple Valley can issue public debt of more than $10,000,000 to pay for acquiring, improving, or financing a project, such as the acquisition of the Town's water system, which is currently owned by a private company, when the debt is to be repaid by feed collected by the Town and not from the Town's taxpayer revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4703, "fingerprint": "2016|201600394|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600394|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "be717808e72db818", "measure_id": "201600394", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the Town of Apple Valley to finance the acquisition of the Liberty Utilities water system and to acquire, improve, or finance other projects, by issuing public debt in excess of $5,000,000, if the Town obtains voter approval or the Town Council holds a public hearing, certifies that the revenues from the project will cover debt payments, prohibits the use of taxpayer revenues to repay the debt, and conducts an annual independent audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14879, "no_votes": 8466, "total_votes": 23345, "percent_yes": 63.73527521953309, "percent_no": 36.26472478046691, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.397815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.765394", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the Town of Apple Valley to finance the acquisition of the Liberty Utilities water system and to acquire, improve, or finance other projects, by issuing public debt in excess of $5,000,000, if the Town obtains voter approval or the Town Council holds a public hearing, certifies that the revenues from the project will cover debt payments, prohibits the use of taxpayer revenues to repay the debt, and conducts an annual independent audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4705, "fingerprint": "2016|201600396|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600396|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "0d3ae8174abf2d38", "measure_id": "201600396", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article III of the Victorville City Charter, Method of Election, be amended to: (1) delete Charter Section 300's requirement that the City elect its council members \"at large\"; and (2) remove Charter Section 301's prohibition on election council members either \"by\" districts or \"from\" districts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12105, "no_votes": 14871, "total_votes": 26976, "percent_yes": 44.873220640569386, "percent_no": 55.126779359430614, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.398351", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.765760", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article III of the Victorville City Charter, Method of Election, be amended to: (1) delete Charter Section 300's requirement that the City elect its council members \"at large\"; and (2) remove Charter Section 301's prohibition on election council members either \"by\" districts or \"from\" districts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4701, "fingerprint": "2016|201600392|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600392|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a20ff3585156e89e", "measure_id": "201600392", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding, that cannot be taken by the State, to maintain Yucca Valley services and help make neighborhoods safer, including: violent crime/burglary/home invasion prevention; youth crime prevention; anti-gang/anti-drug programs; adding police officers/neighborhood patrols; fixing potholes/maintainging Town streets; senior/youth programs; and other general Town services; shall Yucca Valley enact a 0.5% sales tax, for 10 years, providing approximately $1,500,000 annually, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, and all funds spent in Yucca Valley?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5594, "no_votes": 2126, "total_votes": 7720, "percent_yes": 72.46113989637306, "percent_no": 27.538860103626945, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.397224", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.765023", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding, that cannot be taken by the State, to maintain Yucca Valley services and help make neighborhoods safer, including: violent crime/burglary/home invasion prevention; youth crime prevention; anti-gang/anti-drug programs; adding police officers/neighborhood patrols; fixing potholes/maintainging Town streets; senior/youth programs; and other general Town services; shall Yucca Valley enact a 0.5% sales tax, for 10 years, providing approximately $1,500,000 annually, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, and all funds spent in Yucca Valley?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4702, "fingerprint": "2016|201600393|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600393|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4aafb124fcf8b888", "measure_id": "201600393", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To reduce the cost of taxpayers for funding the sewer system up-to 30% per year; ensure a safe, clean, reliable water supply; and, improve water conservation; shall Yucca Valley enact a 0.5% salex tax, for 10 years, providing approximately $1,500,000 annually, that cannot be taken by the State, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, and all funds required by law to be spent locally to equitably reduce the costs of the sewer systems for all residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6281, "no_votes": 1450, "total_votes": 7731, "percent_yes": 81.24434096494632, "percent_no": 18.755659035053682, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.397546", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.765206", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce the cost of taxpayers for funding the sewer system up-to 30% per year; ensure a safe, clean, reliable water supply; and, improve water conservation; shall Yucca Valley enact a 0.5% salex tax, for 10 years, providing approximately $1,500,000 annually, that cannot be taken by the State, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, and all funds required by law to be spent locally to equitably reduce the costs of the sewer systems for all residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11285, "fingerprint": "2016|201600404|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600404|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "af0a098df377e508", "measure_id": "201600404", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to update the process related to redistricting of City Council districts, including amendments to expand the citizen Redistricting Commission from seven to nine members, to clarify and expand the timeline for the appointment and qualification of members, to provide for alternate members on the Commission and appointing panel, and to explain the effective date of boundaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 198064, "no_votes": 77306, "total_votes": 275370, "percent_yes": 71.92649889239931, "percent_no": 28.07350110760069, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.780936", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.403860", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.769258", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to update the process related to redistricting of City Council districts, including amendments to expand the citizen Redistricting Commission from seven to nine members, to clarify and expand the timeline for the appointment and qualification of members, to provide for alternate members on the Commission and appointing panel, and to explain the effective date of boundaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11284, "fingerprint": "2016|201600403|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600403|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7f5fa66dae009366", "measure_id": "201600403", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. CS- 283 of the Carlsbad City Council adopting the Agua Hedionda South Shore Specific Plan (203.4 acres east of the I-5 freeway between the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and Cannon Road), which designates 21.6 acres of additional open space, for a total of 176.7 acres of open space for public access, preservation of natural habitat, and agriculture, along with development of 585,000 square feet of visitor-serving commercial uses on 26.7 acres be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18903, "no_votes": 20542, "total_votes": 39445, "percent_yes": 47.92242362783623, "percent_no": 52.07757637216377, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-02-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.780739", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.403573", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.769077", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. CS- 283 of the Carlsbad City Council adopting the Agua Hedionda South Shore Specific Plan (203.4 acres east of the I-5 freeway between the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and Cannon Road), which designates 21.6 acres of additional open space, for a total of 176.7 acres of open space for public access, preservation of natural habitat, and agriculture, along with development of 585,000 square feet of visitor-serving commercial uses on 26.7 acres be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4720, "fingerprint": "2016|201600080|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600080|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "cee0a406fc3a15d9", "measure_id": "201600080", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to: repair roads, deteriorating bridges; relieve congestion; provide every community funds for pothole/street repairs; expand public transit, including improved services for seniors, disabled, students, veterans; reduce polluted runoff; preserve open space to protect water quality/reduce wildfires by enacting, with independent oversight/audits, a 40-year, half-cent local sales tax ($308 million annually) that Sacramento cannot take away?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 720158, "no_votes": 513646, "total_votes": 1233804, "percent_yes": 58.36891434944286, "percent_no": 41.63108565055714, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.403034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.768704", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to: repair roads, deteriorating bridges; relieve congestion; provide every community funds for pothole/street repairs; expand public transit, including improved services for seniors, disabled, students, veterans; reduce polluted runoff; preserve open space to protect water quality/reduce wildfires by enacting, with independent oversight/audits, a 40-year, half-cent local sales tax ($308 million annually) that Sacramento cannot take away?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4746, "fingerprint": "2016|201600756|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600756|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5c51cf6f39af825f", "measure_id": "201600756", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing tax rates, shall Fallbrook Union High School District repair and upgrade aging classrooms and school facilities, including deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems; improve campus safety/security; upgrade career-training facilities, classrooms, and science labs supporting instruction in math, engineering, technology, science and skilled trades preparing students to be college and career ready; by issuing $45,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11279, "no_votes": 6145, "total_votes": 17424, "percent_yes": 64.73255280073462, "percent_no": 35.267447199265376, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.413330", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.776492", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing tax rates, shall Fallbrook Union High School District repair and upgrade aging classrooms and school facilities, including deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems; improve campus safety/security; upgrade career-training facilities, classrooms, and science labs supporting instruction in math, engineering, technology, science and skilled trades preparing students to be college and career ready; by issuing $45,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11286, "fingerprint": "2016|201600405|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600405|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f421701eb5315bc1", "measure_id": "201600405", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to update provisions related to the authorization and issuance of bonds, to reflect changes in state law, and simplify and conform the City\u2019s processes with the California Constitution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 215776, "no_votes": 56301, "total_votes": 272077, "percent_yes": 79.30696089709899, "percent_no": 20.69303910290101, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.781131", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.404130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.769443", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to update provisions related to the authorization and issuance of bonds, to reflect changes in state law, and simplify and conform the City\u2019s processes with the California Constitution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4721, "fingerprint": "2016|201600081|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600081|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4ca2012407da6882", "measure_id": "201600081", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall this Initiative be adopted for the purpose of amending the County General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Code of Regulatory Ordinances and approving the Lilac Hills Ranch Specific Plan (\u201cPlan\u201d)? The Plan provides for the development of a 608-acre master-planned community including 1,746 dwelling units, three commercial centers, a public park, 10 private parks and 16 miles of trails. The project site is generally located north of Escondido and east of I-15 in the unincorporated area of North San Diego County.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 422322, "no_votes": 735894, "total_votes": 1158216, "percent_yes": 36.46314677055057, "percent_no": 63.53685322944943, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.403305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.768887", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall this Initiative be adopted for the purpose of amending the County General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Code of Regulatory Ordinances and approving the Lilac Hills Ranch Specific Plan (\u201cPlan\u201d)? The Plan provides for the development of a 608-acre master-planned community including 1,746 dwelling units, three commercial centers, a public park, 10 private parks and 16 miles of trails. The project site is generally located north of Escondido and east of I-15 in the unincorporated area of North San Diego County.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4747, "fingerprint": "2016|201600757|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600757|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "2d4e41bfd81234ed", "measure_id": "201600757", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade East County high school classrooms/labs/facilities; repair aging roofs, plumbing/electrical systems; modernize technology infrastructure; improve student safety/security; replace deteriorated portables; construct new school facilities to accommodate growth; and renovate career-training facilities for instruction in science, technology, engineering, math and skilled trades; shall Grossmont Union High School District issue $128,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, no funding for administrator salaries, and all money benefitting East County high schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 105700, "no_votes": 70458, "total_votes": 176158, "percent_yes": 60.00295189545749, "percent_no": 39.99704810454251, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.413771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.776676", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade East County high school classrooms/labs/facilities; repair aging roofs, plumbing/electrical systems; modernize technology infrastructure; improve student safety/security; replace deteriorated portables; construct new school facilities to accommodate growth; and renovate career-training facilities for instruction in science, technology, engineering, math and skilled trades; shall Grossmont Union High School District issue $128,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, no funding for administrator salaries, and all money benefitting East County high schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11287, "fingerprint": "2016|201600415|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600415|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "92d11def41b23723", "measure_id": "201600415", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Should the measure be adopted to: increase San Diego\u2019s hotel occupancy tax by 6% to build a City-owned downtown professional football stadium and convention center project, and fund tourism marketing; effect the project financing, design, construction, use, management, and maintenance, including a $650,000,000 contribution and 30-year commitment by a professional football entity; end Tourism Marketing District assessments; adopt a development ordinance, and related land use, sign, and zoning laws?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 237597, "no_votes": 306887, "total_votes": 544484, "percent_yes": 43.637094937592295, "percent_no": 56.362905062407705, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.783093", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.407077", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.771300", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Should the measure be adopted to: increase San Diego\u2019s hotel occupancy tax by 6% to build a City-owned downtown professional football stadium and convention center project, and fund tourism marketing; effect the project financing, design, construction, use, management, and maintenance, including a $650,000,000 contribution and 30-year commitment by a professional football entity; end Tourism Marketing District assessments; adopt a development ordinance, and related land use, sign, and zoning laws?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4722, "fingerprint": "2016|201600406|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600406|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bcdd0bf9f4534200", "measure_id": "201600406", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to clarify the manner in which the City levies, assesses and collects property taxes in the City, and to repeal provisions regarding property taxes the City is not able to levy as a result of Proposition 13 and related state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 184271, "no_votes": 89450, "total_votes": 273721, "percent_yes": 67.32073900066126, "percent_no": 32.67926099933874, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.404397", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.769629", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to clarify the manner in which the City levies, assesses and collects property taxes in the City, and to repeal provisions regarding property taxes the City is not able to levy as a result of Proposition 13 and related state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4753, "fingerprint": "2016|201600763|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600763|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bdc8115d22f66591", "measure_id": "201600763", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Members of the Sweetwater Union High School District Board of Trustees be limited to two (2) terms of office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 131550, "no_votes": 23248, "total_votes": 154798, "percent_yes": 84.98171811005311, "percent_no": 15.018281889946891, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.415929", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.777829", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Members of the Sweetwater Union High School District Board of Trustees be limited to two (2) terms of office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11288, "fingerprint": "2016|201600416|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600416|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "994024555cf4f38c", "measure_id": "201600416", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the measure be adopted to: among other provisions, increase San Diego\u2019s hotel occupancy tax up to 5%; end Tourism Marketing District; allow hoteliers to create assessment districts and use hotel occupancy taxes for downtown convention center and not a stadium; prohibit contiguous expansion of existing convention center; create downtown overlay zone for convention and sports facilities; create environmental processes; and allow Qualcomm stadium property\u2019s sale for educational and park uses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 211739, "no_votes": 303144, "total_votes": 514883, "percent_yes": 41.12371160049953, "percent_no": 58.87628839950047, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.783290", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.407417", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.771673", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the measure be adopted to: among other provisions, increase San Diego\u2019s hotel occupancy tax up to 5%; end Tourism Marketing District; allow hoteliers to create assessment districts and use hotel occupancy taxes for downtown convention center and not a stadium; prohibit contiguous expansion of existing convention center; create downtown overlay zone for convention and sports facilities; create environmental processes; and allow Qualcomm stadium property\u2019s sale for educational and park uses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4723, "fingerprint": "2016|201600407|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600407|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3a12f9ecc3b4ffe7", "measure_id": "201600407", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter section 70 be amended to conform to existing provisions related to the Strong Mayor form of government, by updating titles of specified officers and clarifying who has authority to fix their salaries and the City\u2019s compensation schedules; to specify the City\u2019s legal duty to comply with California\u2019s collective bargaining laws in establishing annual compensation schedules; and to update language?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 211923, "no_votes": 62683, "total_votes": 274606, "percent_yes": 77.17347763705091, "percent_no": 22.826522362949092, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.404697", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.769815", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter section 70 be amended to conform to existing provisions related to the Strong Mayor form of government, by updating titles of specified officers and clarifying who has authority to fix their salaries and the City\u2019s compensation schedules; to specify the City\u2019s legal duty to comply with California\u2019s collective bargaining laws in establishing annual compensation schedules; and to update language?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4743, "fingerprint": "2016|201600753|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600753|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9d69f8c0d3a1c6dc", "measure_id": "201600753", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct and equip a new high school; install emergency communication systems; reduce traffic hazards for increased student safety; upgrade power/electrical systems; provide health/fitness facilities for student/community use; repair leaky pipes/deteriorating roofs; and replace temporary buildings with permanent classrooms; shall Bonsall Unified School District issue $58 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4204, "no_votes": 4099, "total_votes": 8303, "percent_yes": 50.632301577742986, "percent_no": 49.367698422257014, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.412491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.775929", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct and equip a new high school; install emergency communication systems; reduce traffic hazards for increased student safety; upgrade power/electrical systems; provide health/fitness facilities for student/community use; repair leaky pipes/deteriorating roofs; and replace temporary buildings with permanent classrooms; shall Bonsall Unified School District issue $58 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11289, "fingerprint": "2016|201600419|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600419|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "eed0784452dc6eb9", "measure_id": "201600419", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to include a new article adding: incapacity, felony conviction, and removal as grounds for vacancies in office; a procedure for calling a special election to remove an officer for cause; a revised procedure for filling vacancies; to require the City Attorney be a licensed attorney; and to define authority during vacancies and enforcement of office forfeiture?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 419748, "no_votes": 62400, "total_votes": 482148, "percent_yes": 87.05791582667563, "percent_no": 12.942084173324375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.783877", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.408304", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.772575", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to include a new article adding: incapacity, felony conviction, and removal as grounds for vacancies in office; a procedure for calling a special election to remove an officer for cause; a revised procedure for filling vacancies; to require the City Attorney be a licensed attorney; and to define authority during vacancies and enforcement of office forfeiture?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4724, "fingerprint": "2016|201600408|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600408|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "97f0faf05e764a9a", "measure_id": "201600408", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to update the process related to budgeting and appropriating funds, to consolidate provisions that appeared throughout the Charter and to clarify the approval process for the City budget?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 225949, "no_votes": 45719, "total_votes": 271668, "percent_yes": 83.17100284170384, "percent_no": 16.82899715829616, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.405063", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.770004", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to update the process related to budgeting and appropriating funds, to consolidate provisions that appeared throughout the Charter and to clarify the approval process for the City budget?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4744, "fingerprint": "2016|201600754|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600754|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "76f922393991d40b", "measure_id": "201600754", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational technology; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; implement statewide technology requirements for testing and learning; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall Cajon Valley Union School District issue $20,000,000 of shortterm bonds with the interest rates at or below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator/teacher salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30406, "no_votes": 22787, "total_votes": 53193, "percent_yes": 57.16165660895231, "percent_no": 42.83834339104769, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.412791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.776112", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational technology; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; implement statewide technology requirements for testing and learning; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall Cajon Valley Union School District issue $20,000,000 of shortterm bonds with the interest rates at or below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator/teacher salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11290, "fingerprint": "2016|201600420|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600420|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "488e9b28ac63b6c9", "measure_id": "201600420", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to change the term of service required of Deputy City Attorneys, for protection from termination or suspension without good cause, from two years or more of continuous service to one year or more of continuous service, which protection would continue not to apply to layoffs due to lack of work or insufficient appropriations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 317803, "no_votes": 147720, "total_votes": 465523, "percent_yes": 68.26794809279026, "percent_no": 31.732051907209737, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.784074", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.408571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.772802", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to change the term of service required of Deputy City Attorneys, for protection from termination or suspension without good cause, from two years or more of continuous service to one year or more of continuous service, which protection would continue not to apply to layoffs due to lack of work or insufficient appropriations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4725, "fingerprint": "2016|201600409|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600409|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9e2a2ffa7efc4938", "measure_id": "201600409", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to update the City\u2019s financial operations, including amendments regarding the certification of funds, the authorization and payment of claims, the management of funds, the disposition of proceeds of the sale of City-owned real property and the establishment of reserves?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 218384, "no_votes": 50807, "total_votes": 269191, "percent_yes": 81.12604061799986, "percent_no": 18.873959382000137, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.405336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.770188", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to update the City\u2019s financial operations, including amendments regarding the certification of funds, the authorization and payment of claims, the management of funds, the disposition of proceeds of the sale of City-owned real property and the establishment of reserves?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11291, "fingerprint": "2016|201600421|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600421|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "66421846ed2e22d1", "measure_id": "201600421", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 43(d) of the City Charter be amended to rename the Citizens\u2019 Review Board on Police Practices as the Community Review Board on Police Practices, to replace references to \u201cCity Manager\u201d with \u201cMayor and City Council,\u201d and to require the board to review all deaths occurring while someone is in the custody of the San Diego Police Department and all police officer-related shootings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 404803, "no_votes": 82372, "total_votes": 487175, "percent_yes": 83.09190742546313, "percent_no": 16.908092574536866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.784273", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.408851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.773051", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 43(d) of the City Charter be amended to rename the Citizens\u2019 Review Board on Police Practices as the Community Review Board on Police Practices, to replace references to \u201cCity Manager\u201d with \u201cMayor and City Council,\u201d and to require the board to review all deaths occurring while someone is in the custody of the San Diego Police Department and all police officer-related shootings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4726, "fingerprint": "2016|201600410|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600410|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "32d765c23ae9944a", "measure_id": "201600410", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to update language and to repeal the requirement that the City Auditor conduct audits and investigations of City officials and officers upon their death, resignation, or removal from City office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 192814, "no_votes": 81853, "total_votes": 274667, "percent_yes": 70.19918665147252, "percent_no": 29.800813348527484, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.405603", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.770376", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to update language and to repeal the requirement that the City Auditor conduct audits and investigations of City officials and officers upon their death, resignation, or removal from City office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4745, "fingerprint": "2016|201600755|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600755|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "71f9ec9c45f7110f", "measure_id": "201600755", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with local funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace roofs; renovate deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; make health, safety, and energy efficiency improvements; and replace portables with permanent classrooms; shall Cardiff Elementary School District issue $22 million of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3994, "no_votes": 2063, "total_votes": 6057, "percent_yes": 65.94023443949149, "percent_no": 34.05976556050851, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.413064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.776294", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with local funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace roofs; renovate deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; make health, safety, and energy efficiency improvements; and replace portables with permanent classrooms; shall Cardiff Elementary School District issue $22 million of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11292, "fingerprint": "2016|201600422|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600422|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ff792652518ca77e", "measure_id": "201600422", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: require contracts for public works, goods, services, and consultants to be awarded through a competitive process in accordance with rules adopted by ordinance, remove the position of Purchasing Agent, eliminate the requirement to publish certain notices in printed newspapers, and update other provisions consistent with state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 360127, "no_votes": 107047, "total_votes": 467174, "percent_yes": 77.08626764331919, "percent_no": 22.91373235668081, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.784469", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.409159", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.773305", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: require contracts for public works, goods, services, and consultants to be awarded through a competitive process in accordance with rules adopted by ordinance, remove the position of Purchasing Agent, eliminate the requirement to publish certain notices in printed newspapers, and update other provisions consistent with state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4727, "fingerprint": "2016|201600411|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600411|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "720bdc33ad118dcd", "measure_id": "201600411", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to require certain unrestricted General Fund revenues to be deposited in an Infrastructure Fund used exclusively to pay for capital improvements including streets, sidewalks, bridges, bike paths, storm water and drainage systems; public buildings including libraries, recreational and community centers; public safety facilities including police, fire and lifeguard stations; and park facilities, but expressly not used for new convention center facilities and new professional sports venues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 186617, "no_votes": 100395, "total_votes": 287012, "percent_yes": 65.02062631527602, "percent_no": 34.97937368472398, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.405900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.770559", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to require certain unrestricted General Fund revenues to be deposited in an Infrastructure Fund used exclusively to pay for capital improvements including streets, sidewalks, bridges, bike paths, storm water and drainage systems; public buildings including libraries, recreational and community centers; public safety facilities including police, fire and lifeguard stations; and park facilities, but expressly not used for new convention center facilities and new professional sports venues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4750, "fingerprint": "2016|201600760|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600760|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "40771a8454a89be8", "measure_id": "201600760", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and rebuild aging classrooms and facilities throughout the District; meet handicapped access requirements; increase student access to computers /technology; repair roofs; and improve campus security and student loading zones for increased safety; shall National School District be authorized to issue $30 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrative salaries and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and used elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11772, "no_votes": 2386, "total_votes": 14158, "percent_yes": 83.147337194519, "percent_no": 16.852662805481003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.414964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.777239", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and rebuild aging classrooms and facilities throughout the District; meet handicapped access requirements; increase student access to computers /technology; repair roofs; and improve campus security and student loading zones for increased safety; shall National School District be authorized to issue $30 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrative salaries and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and used elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11293, "fingerprint": "2016|201600423|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600423|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "cc06cea725e9fc67", "measure_id": "201600423", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter section 55 be amended to authorize the City Council to lease the dedicated park property in Balboa Park currently occupied by San Diego High School, to the San Diego Unified School District for educational, cultural, recreational, and civic programs and activities, provided that the property is used for a public high school?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 383025, "no_votes": 108565, "total_votes": 491590, "percent_yes": 77.9155393722411, "percent_no": 22.0844606277589, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.784666", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.409427", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.773535", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter section 55 be amended to authorize the City Council to lease the dedicated park property in Balboa Park currently occupied by San Diego High School, to the San Diego Unified School District for educational, cultural, recreational, and civic programs and activities, provided that the property is used for a public high school?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4728, "fingerprint": "2016|201600412|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600412|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3c465e6d52a7cb78", "measure_id": "201600412", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance O-20390 be approved, establishing that employers are to compensate employees working in the City of San Diego with earned sick leave of up to forty hours a year and a minimum wage of $10.50 an hour upon the Ordinance\u2019s effective date, $11.50 an hour on January 1, 2017, and increasing with the cost of living on January 1, 2019 and annually thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 193300, "no_votes": 109500, "total_votes": 302800, "percent_yes": 63.83751651254954, "percent_no": 36.16248348745046, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.406201", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.770741", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance O-20390 be approved, establishing that employers are to compensate employees working in the City of San Diego with earned sick leave of up to forty hours a year and a minimum wage of $10.50 an hour upon the Ordinance\u2019s effective date, $11.50 an hour on January 1, 2017, and increasing with the cost of living on January 1, 2019 and annually thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4733, "fingerprint": "2016|201600424|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600424|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4f72be4c9a188d0d", "measure_id": "201600424", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter section 55.2 be amended to: increase, from 25% to 35%, the allocation of annual Mission Bay Park lease revenues exceeding $20 million, for capital improvements in San Diego Regional Parks; allow Council to add City-owned parkland to Mission Bay Park\u2019s boundaries; combine and coordinate construction of Mission Bay Park improvements identified in this section; and extend operation of this section until 2069?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 336810, "no_votes": 136933, "total_votes": 473743, "percent_yes": 71.09550959064302, "percent_no": 28.90449040935698, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.409700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.773764", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter section 55.2 be amended to: increase, from 25% to 35%, the allocation of annual Mission Bay Park lease revenues exceeding $20 million, for capital improvements in San Diego Regional Parks; allow Council to add City-owned parkland to Mission Bay Park\u2019s boundaries; combine and coordinate construction of Mission Bay Park improvements identified in this section; and extend operation of this section until 2069?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4751, "fingerprint": "2016|201600761|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600761|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "293190543923e138", "measure_id": "201600761", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace or upgrade aging, outdated classrooms, science labs, libraries, and school buildings; restore deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems; improve student safety and campus security; and, provide students access to educational facilities, science, and technology needed to prepare for high school, college, and careers, and qualify for State grants, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2016-1 of the Solana Beach School District issue $105,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizen\u2019s oversight committee, and NO money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11776, "no_votes": 6135, "total_votes": 17911, "percent_yes": 65.74730612472783, "percent_no": 34.25269387527217, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.415303", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.777436", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace or upgrade aging, outdated classrooms, science labs, libraries, and school buildings; restore deteriorating roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems; improve student safety and campus security; and, provide students access to educational facilities, science, and technology needed to prepare for high school, college, and careers, and qualify for State grants, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2016-1 of the Solana Beach School District issue $105,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizen\u2019s oversight committee, and NO money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4734, "fingerprint": "2016|201600425|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600425|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "28e63c26544c9899", "measure_id": "201600425", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to eliminate the provision that elects a candidate for Mayor, City Attorney, or Councilmember to office if the candidate receives a majority vote in the June primary election, and instead require a run-off election at the November general election between the two candidates who received the most votes in the primary election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 280075, "no_votes": 194412, "total_votes": 474487, "percent_yes": 59.02690695424743, "percent_no": 40.97309304575257, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.409976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.774005", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to eliminate the provision that elects a candidate for Mayor, City Attorney, or Councilmember to office if the candidate receives a majority vote in the June primary election, and instead require a run-off election at the November general election between the two candidates who received the most votes in the primary election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4719, "fingerprint": "2016|201600079|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600079|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3ac8ab6405cc2c0a", "measure_id": "201600079", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Rincon Ranch Community Services District be authorized to establish and levy a special tax override, on all taxable real property within its boundaries for the purpose of providing funds for repair and resurface of the roads maintained by the District, with this special tax not to exceed five dollars and twenty cents ($5.20) per acre, or portion thereof, plus one hundred fifty dollars ($150) per parcel of land per year with a provision for an annual increase not to exceed the annual Engineering News Record (ENR) for the prior year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44, "no_votes": 36, "total_votes": 80, "percent_yes": 55.00000000000001, "percent_no": 44.99999999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.402757", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.768519", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Rincon Ranch Community Services District be authorized to establish and levy a special tax override, on all taxable real property within its boundaries for the purpose of providing funds for repair and resurface of the roads maintained by the District, with this special tax not to exceed five dollars and twenty cents ($5.20) per acre, or portion thereof, plus one hundred fifty dollars ($150) per parcel of land per year with a provision for an annual increase not to exceed the annual Engineering News Record (ENR) for the prior year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4735, "fingerprint": "2016|201600426|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600426|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b8c82f90725d5418", "measure_id": "201600426", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to require qualified citizens\u2019 initiative and referendum measures to be submitted to voters on the next November general election ballot and not at a June primary election, unless the Council chooses to submit the measure to voters prior to that election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 305638, "no_votes": 158911, "total_votes": 464549, "percent_yes": 65.79241371739042, "percent_no": 34.20758628260958, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.410248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.774236", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to require qualified citizens\u2019 initiative and referendum measures to be submitted to voters on the next November general election ballot and not at a June primary election, unless the Council chooses to submit the measure to voters prior to that election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4742, "fingerprint": "2016|201600433|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600433|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f813ff4f832f9e21", "measure_id": "201600433", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters increase by 38,680 the maximum number of housing units the City and certain other public agencies are allowed to help develop, construct, or acquire for people with low incomes, without this ballot measure approving specific housing units, providing funds for development, removing requirements that otherwise apply, or taking any other action?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 328588, "no_votes": 166171, "total_votes": 494759, "percent_yes": 66.41374891613897, "percent_no": 33.58625108386103, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.412190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.775741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters increase by 38,680 the maximum number of housing units the City and certain other public agencies are allowed to help develop, construct, or acquire for people with low incomes, without this ballot measure approving specific housing units, providing funds for development, removing requirements that otherwise apply, or taking any other action?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4749, "fingerprint": "2016|201600759|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600759|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b2f92051c09ac8a6", "measure_id": "201600759", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms and career training facilities for science, healthcare, technology, advanced manufacturing, other growing local industries, provide job training/placement to Navy/ Marines/ other veterans, improve access to affordable higher education to local students, improve disabled access, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall MiraCosta Community College District issue $455,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, subject to local control, requiring annual audits, and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 104493, "no_votes": 62992, "total_votes": 167485, "percent_yes": 62.38946771352658, "percent_no": 37.61053228647342, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.414678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.777055", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms and career training facilities for science, healthcare, technology, advanced manufacturing, other growing local industries, provide job training/placement to Navy/ Marines/ other veterans, improve access to affordable higher education to local students, improve disabled access, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall MiraCosta Community College District issue $455,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, subject to local control, requiring annual audits, and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4731, "fingerprint": "2016|201600417|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600417|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "21341ab87951cd7f", "measure_id": "201600417", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If California voters approve Proposition 64 legalizing marijuana in the state, shall the City adopt an ordinance imposing a gross receipts tax, for general revenue purposes, on non-medical cannabis (also known as marijuana) businesses operating in the City, initially set at 5% and increasing to 8% on July 1, 2019, having a maximum rate of 15%, generating an undetermined amount of revenue and continuing indefinitely?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 351088, "no_votes": 160109, "total_votes": 511197, "percent_yes": 68.67958927771485, "percent_no": 31.320410722285146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.407771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.772093", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If California voters approve Proposition 64 legalizing marijuana in the state, shall the City adopt an ordinance imposing a gross receipts tax, for general revenue purposes, on non-medical cannabis (also known as marijuana) businesses operating in the City, initially set at 5% and increasing to 8% on July 1, 2019, having a maximum rate of 15%, generating an undetermined amount of revenue and continuing indefinitely?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 4736, "fingerprint": "2016|201600427|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600427|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b78aa87afa89d7c5", "measure_id": "201600427", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do the voters of the City of Carlsbad approve spending existing city funds from various sources, including the General Fund, in an amount to exceed $1 million to construct a replacement Fire Station 2 located at the intersection of El Camino Real and Arenal Road for an estimated cost range of $7 million up to $10.5 million?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39690, "no_votes": 16130, "total_votes": 55820, "percent_yes": 71.10354711572913, "percent_no": 28.89645288427087, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.410565", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.774482", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do the voters of the City of Carlsbad approve spending existing city funds from various sources, including the General Fund, in an amount to exceed $1 million to construct a replacement Fire Station 2 located at the intersection of El Camino Real and Arenal Road for an estimated cost range of $7 million up to $10.5 million?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4729, "fingerprint": "2016|201600413|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600413|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4f77d6de8ebc4aff", "measure_id": "201600413", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To repair neighborhood streets and sidewalks, replace storm drains to prevent sinkholes, update police, paramedic and 9-1-1 equipment and facilities, improve parks, repair recreation facilities, and for general city services and infrastructure, shall the City of Chula Vista adopt an ordinance enacting a temporary \u00bd cent sales tax, generating an estimated $16 million per year, expiring in 10 years, with no further increases without voter approval, with all funds staying in Chula Vista, requiring citizen oversight and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64704, "no_votes": 29845, "total_votes": 94549, "percent_yes": 68.43435678854351, "percent_no": 31.56564321145649, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.406473", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.770929", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair neighborhood streets and sidewalks, replace storm drains to prevent sinkholes, update police, paramedic and 9-1-1 equipment and facilities, improve parks, repair recreation facilities, and for general city services and infrastructure, shall the City of Chula Vista adopt an ordinance enacting a temporary \u00bd cent sales tax, generating an estimated $16 million per year, expiring in 10 years, with no further increases without voter approval, with all funds staying in Chula Vista, requiring citizen oversight and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4730, "fingerprint": "2016|201600414|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600414|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6f4ad03a1baca040", "measure_id": "201600414", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for general city services and infrastructure projects, such as improvement of streets and sidewalks, utility undergrounding, public landscapes, improvement of community parks, trails and recreation facilities; police, crime prevention, fire prevention and other public safety services, shall an ordinance that establishes an ongoing one-cent sales tax be adopted, providing an estimated 2 million dollars annually for the City of Del Mar, requiring citizen oversight and independent audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1732, "no_votes": 871, "total_votes": 2603, "percent_yes": 66.53860929696505, "percent_no": 33.46139070303495, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.406775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.771115", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for general city services and infrastructure projects, such as improvement of streets and sidewalks, utility undergrounding, public landscapes, improvement of community parks, trails and recreation facilities; police, crime prevention, fire prevention and other public safety services, shall an ordinance that establishes an ongoing one-cent sales tax be adopted, providing an estimated 2 million dollars annually for the City of Del Mar, requiring citizen oversight and independent audits, and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4737, "fingerprint": "2016|201600428|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600428|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e53b00a6486bccfd", "measure_id": "201600428", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance which proposes to amend the Del Mar Community Plan, Housing Element, and Municipal Code to require voter approval for certain development projects be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1256, "no_votes": 1315, "total_votes": 2571, "percent_yes": 48.85258654220147, "percent_no": 51.14741345779853, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.410859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.774726", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance which proposes to amend the Del Mar Community Plan, Housing Element, and Municipal Code to require voter approval for certain development projects be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4732, "fingerprint": "2016|201600418|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600418|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6798b30c8563b25d", "measure_id": "201600418", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve amending Section 201 of the City of El Cajon Charter to require election of City Council members by geographic districts in which they reside beginning with the general municipal election to be held in 2018?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 188671, "no_votes": 8327, "total_votes": 196998, "percent_yes": 95.7730535335384, "percent_no": 4.226946466461598, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.408037", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.772346", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve amending Section 201 of the City of El Cajon Charter to require election of City Council members by geographic districts in which they reside beginning with the general municipal election to be held in 2018?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4738, "fingerprint": "2016|201600429|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600429|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6dcdb8a01bdc2814", "measure_id": "201600429", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Council Resolution No. 2016-52 and Ordinance No. 2016-04, which collectively update the City\u2019s General Plan Housing Element, amend related General Plan provisions, and amend Specific Plans, Zoning Code, Zoning Map, Municipal Code, and Local Coastal Program, in an effort to comply with State law, incentivize greater housing affordability, implement rules to protect the character of existing neighborhoods, maintain local control of Encinitas zoning, and resolve existing lawsuits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17943, "no_votes": 14144, "total_votes": 32087, "percent_yes": 55.9198429270421, "percent_no": 44.0801570729579, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.411131", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.774955", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Council Resolution No. 2016-52 and Ordinance No. 2016-04, which collectively update the City\u2019s General Plan Housing Element, amend related General Plan provisions, and amend Specific Plans, Zoning Code, Zoning Map, Municipal Code, and Local Coastal Program, in an effort to comply with State law, incentivize greater housing affordability, implement rules to protect the character of existing neighborhoods, maintain local control of Encinitas zoning, and resolve existing lawsuits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4739, "fingerprint": "2016|201600430|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600430|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "957938ae488b08a0", "measure_id": "201600430", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance amending the La Mesa Municipal Code to authorize and regulate medical marijuana dispensaries, and the cultivating and manufacturing of medical marijuana, in the City of La Mesa, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13322, "no_votes": 11829, "total_votes": 25151, "percent_yes": 52.96807284004612, "percent_no": 47.03192715995388, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.411400", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.775185", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance amending the La Mesa Municipal Code to authorize and regulate medical marijuana dispensaries, and the cultivating and manufacturing of medical marijuana, in the City of La Mesa, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4740, "fingerprint": "2016|201600431|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600431|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "00bbc0c2a50fc478", "measure_id": "201600431", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance to Rescind the prohibition of Marijuana Dispensaries and Add the Medical Marijuana Regulatory Ordinance to the Lemon Grove Municipal Code be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4741, "no_votes": 4651, "total_votes": 9392, "percent_yes": 50.47913117546848, "percent_no": 49.52086882453152, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.411667", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.775369", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance to Rescind the prohibition of Marijuana Dispensaries and Add the Medical Marijuana Regulatory Ordinance to the Lemon Grove Municipal Code be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4741, "fingerprint": "2016|201600432|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600432|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ed8778700814dcea", "measure_id": "201600432", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve Specific Plan Amendment 16-002 as adopted by the Poway City Council to amend the Old Coach Golf Estates Specific Plan, to allow development of a hotel with up to 240 rooms on the existing Maderas Golf Course site located at 17750 Old Coach Road?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11319, "no_votes": 11999, "total_votes": 23318, "percent_yes": 48.54189896217514, "percent_no": 51.45810103782486, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.411929", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.775556", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve Specific Plan Amendment 16-002 as adopted by the Poway City Council to amend the Old Coach Golf Estates Specific Plan, to allow development of a hotel with up to 240 rooms on the existing Maderas Golf Course site located at 17750 Old Coach Road?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4748, "fingerprint": "2016|201600758|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600758|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a32c37e48ad1a10b", "measure_id": "201600758", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms/ labs, prepare veterans, workers/students for technology, business, science/ other jobs, construct Workforce Training Center, support East County economic development, remove asbestos/lead paint, repair gas, electrical/sewer lines, repair, acquire, construct facilities, sites/ equipment, shall Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District issue $348,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, independent audits, citizen oversight, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97061, "no_votes": 83366, "total_votes": 180427, "percent_yes": 53.795163695012384, "percent_no": 46.204836304987616, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.414362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.776862", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms/ labs, prepare veterans, workers/students for technology, business, science/ other jobs, construct Workforce Training Center, support East County economic development, remove asbestos/lead paint, repair gas, electrical/sewer lines, repair, acquire, construct facilities, sites/ equipment, shall Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District issue $348,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, independent audits, citizen oversight, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4752, "fingerprint": "2016|201600762|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600762|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ff0fb069f39c50fd", "measure_id": "201600762", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/ upgrade local community college campuses, prepare students/ veterans for jobs/ university transfer, repair deteriorating roofs, electrical wiring, gas, water/ sewer lines, remove asbestos/ lead paint, improve energy efficiency/ campus safety/ security, upgrade, acquire, repair, construct classrooms/ labs/ sites/ facilities/ equipment, shall Southwestern Community College District issue $400 million in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/ pensions, independent audits, citizen oversight, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115479, "no_votes": 48411, "total_votes": 163890, "percent_yes": 70.46128500823723, "percent_no": 29.538714991762774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.415626", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.777637", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/ upgrade local community college campuses, prepare students/ veterans for jobs/ university transfer, repair deteriorating roofs, electrical wiring, gas, water/ sewer lines, remove asbestos/ lead paint, improve energy efficiency/ campus safety/ security, upgrade, acquire, repair, construct classrooms/ labs/ sites/ facilities/ equipment, shall Southwestern Community College District issue $400 million in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/ pensions, independent audits, citizen oversight, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11298, "fingerprint": "2016|201600765|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600765|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "7d21354968338062", "measure_id": "201600765", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and rehabilitate San Francisco Unified School District facilities to current accessibility, health, safety, seismic and instructional standards, replace worn-out plumbing, electrical, HVAC, and major building systems, renovate outdated classrooms and training facilities, construct school facilities and replace aging modular classrooms, improve information technology systems and food service preparation systems, shall the San Francisco Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $744,250,000 at legal rates, with annual audits, and citizen\u2019s oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 289351, "no_votes": 73307, "total_votes": 362658, "percent_yes": 79.78618974350489, "percent_no": 20.21381025649511, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.795038", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.424611", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.783462", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and rehabilitate San Francisco Unified School District facilities to current accessibility, health, safety, seismic and instructional standards, replace worn-out plumbing, electrical, HVAC, and major building systems, renovate outdated classrooms and training facilities, construct school facilities and replace aging modular classrooms, improve information technology systems and food service preparation systems, shall the San Francisco Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $744,250,000 at legal rates, with annual audits, and citizen\u2019s oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4755, "fingerprint": "2016|201600083|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600083|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b939f70066537616", "measure_id": "201600083", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect public health and safety, improve community medical and mental health care services, earthquake safety, and emergency medical response; to seismically improve, and modernize neighborhood fire stations and vital public health and homeless service sites; to construct a seismically safe and improved San Francisco Fire Department ambulance deployment facility; and to pay related costs, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $350,000,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 190708, "no_votes": 49899, "total_votes": 240607, "percent_yes": 79.26120187691963, "percent_no": 20.73879812308037, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.416508", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.778195", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect public health and safety, improve community medical and mental health care services, earthquake safety, and emergency medical response; to seismically improve, and modernize neighborhood fire stations and vital public health and homeless service sites; to construct a seismically safe and improved San Francisco Fire Department ambulance deployment facility; and to pay related costs, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $350,000,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4754, "fingerprint": "2016|201600082|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600082|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "c9ac6c8127701fb7", "measure_id": "201600082", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 186674, "no_votes": 53766, "total_votes": 240440, "percent_yes": 77.63849609050075, "percent_no": 22.36150390949925, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.416230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.778009", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11297, "fingerprint": "2016|201600764|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600764|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d0150e8651846c07", "measure_id": "201600764", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue providing City College of San Francisco local funds the state cannot take away and offset cuts to prevent layoffs; ensure affordable education for students; maintain core classes in writing, math and science; prepare students for four-year universities, workforce training in careers in nursing, engineering/ technology; provide counselors; keep college libraries open; shall San Francisco Community College District renew its existing annual parcel tax at $99 per parcel for 15 years, requiring annual independent audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 291565, "no_votes": 70099, "total_votes": 361664, "percent_yes": 80.6176451070607, "percent_no": 19.382354892939304, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.794843", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.424323", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.783279", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue providing City College of San Francisco local funds the state cannot take away and offset cuts to prevent layoffs; ensure affordable education for students; maintain core classes in writing, math and science; prepare students for four-year universities, workforce training in careers in nursing, engineering/ technology; provide counselors; keep college libraries open; shall San Francisco Community College District renew its existing annual parcel tax at $99 per parcel for 15 years, requiring annual independent audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4756, "fingerprint": "2016|201600084|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600084|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "176b1d05d34e9079", "measure_id": "201600084", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to extend the Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund until 2046 and give the Recreation and Park Department each year a minimum baseline amount from the General Fund in addition to the Fund set-aside of 2\u00bd cents for each $100 of assessed property value?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143113, "no_votes": 95223, "total_votes": 238336, "percent_yes": 60.04674073576799, "percent_no": 39.95325926423201, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.416781", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.778379", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to extend the Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund until 2046 and give the Recreation and Park Department each year a minimum baseline amount from the General Fund in addition to the Fund set-aside of 2\u00bd cents for each $100 of assessed property value?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11294, "fingerprint": "2016|201600091|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600091|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "101c36d7ad1b040e", "measure_id": "201600091", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To Amend 1992 voter approved measure Proposition A, to allow as an additional purpose the incurrence of bonded indebtedness to finance the acquisition, improvement, and rehabilitation of at-risk multi-unit residential buildings and to convert such structures to permanent affordable housing; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue up to $260,700,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 270113, "no_votes": 82035, "total_votes": 352148, "percent_yes": 76.70439701489147, "percent_no": 23.29560298510853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.791080", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.418745", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.779678", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To Amend 1992 voter approved measure Proposition A, to allow as an additional purpose the incurrence of bonded indebtedness to finance the acquisition, improvement, and rehabilitation of at-risk multi-unit residential buildings and to convert such structures to permanent affordable housing; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue up to $260,700,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4757, "fingerprint": "2016|201600085|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600085|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "699338fbc04caf05", "measure_id": "201600085", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to increase affordable housing requirements for private developers of new market-rate housing projects of 25 or more units until the Board of Supervisors passes an ordinance changing those requirements and also authorize the Board of Supervisors to change affordable housing requirements by ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 161324, "no_votes": 76207, "total_votes": 237531, "percent_yes": 67.91702977716592, "percent_no": 32.08297022283408, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.417051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.778573", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to increase affordable housing requirements for private developers of new market-rate housing projects of 25 or more units until the Board of Supervisors passes an ordinance changing those requirements and also authorize the Board of Supervisors to change affordable housing requirements by ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11295, "fingerprint": "2016|201600092|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600092|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "4a2480b4dedfe219", "measure_id": "201600092", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to require the Mayor to make a temporary appointment to fill a vacancy in a local elected office within 28 days of the date of the vacancy; provide that the person who temporarily fills a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors cannot run in the election held to fill that vacancy for the remainder of the term; and require the City to hold an election to fill a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors within 126 to 154 days if there is no City election scheduled, within 180 days if another election is already scheduled within that period, or more than 180 days later if requested by the Director of Elections and approved by the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 163642, "no_votes": 180369, "total_votes": 344011, "percent_yes": 47.56882774097341, "percent_no": 52.43117225902659, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.791279", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.419025", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.779862", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to require the Mayor to make a temporary appointment to fill a vacancy in a local elected office within 28 days of the date of the vacancy; provide that the person who temporarily fills a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors cannot run in the election held to fill that vacancy for the remainder of the term; and require the City to hold an election to fill a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors within 126 to 154 days if there is no City election scheduled, within 180 days if another election is already scheduled within that period, or more than 180 days later if requested by the Director of Elections and approved by the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4758, "fingerprint": "2016|201600086|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600086|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0892391eed82940f", "measure_id": "201600086", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Office of Citizen Complaints investigate any incident occurring within the City in which a San Francisco police officer fires a gun killing or physically injuring someone?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 194462, "no_votes": 45838, "total_votes": 240300, "percent_yes": 80.92467748647523, "percent_no": 19.075322513524767, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.417350", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.778759", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of Citizen Complaints investigate any incident occurring within the City in which a San Francisco police officer fires a gun killing or physically injuring someone?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11296, "fingerprint": "2016|201600093|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600093|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f406a98d410bf80e", "measure_id": "201600093", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to transfer responsibility from property owners to the City for maintaining trees on sidewalks around their property as well as sidewalks damaged by the trees, and pay for this by setting aside $19 million per year from its General Fund, adjusted annually based on City revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 283009, "no_votes": 77078, "total_votes": 360087, "percent_yes": 78.59461741190323, "percent_no": 21.40538258809677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.791473", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.419308", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.780045", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to transfer responsibility from property owners to the City for maintaining trees on sidewalks around their property as well as sidewalks damaged by the trees, and pay for this by setting aside $19 million per year from its General Fund, adjusted annually based on City revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4759, "fingerprint": "2016|201600087|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600087|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f24751cc2b6e8424", "measure_id": "201600087", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Paid Sick Leave Ordinance to parallel broader state law provisions without reducing the Paid Sick Leave Ordinance\u2019s coverage and allow employees to use paid sick leave hours for the broader purposes authorized by state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 186199, "no_votes": 47992, "total_votes": 234191, "percent_yes": 79.50732521745071, "percent_no": 20.492674782549287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.417655", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.778941", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Paid Sick Leave Ordinance to parallel broader state law provisions without reducing the Paid Sick Leave Ordinance\u2019s coverage and allow employees to use paid sick leave hours for the broader purposes authorized by state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4763, "fingerprint": "2016|201600094|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600094|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "31e9ff171ae6b1da", "measure_id": "201600094", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to allow San Francisco residents to vote on local candidates and local ballot measures if they are U.S. citizens, at least 16 years old and registered to vote?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 172744, "no_votes": 187860, "total_votes": 360604, "percent_yes": 47.90407205688234, "percent_no": 52.09592794311766, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.419584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.780229", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to allow San Francisco residents to vote on local candidates and local ballot measures if they are U.S. citizens, at least 16 years old and registered to vote?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4764, "fingerprint": "2016|201600095|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600095|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a6e01cc35dd2be5d", "measure_id": "201600095", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to rename the Office of Citizen Complaints as the Department of Police Accountability (DPA); require the DPA to review the San Francisco Police Department\u2019s use-of-force policies and its handling of claims of police misconduct; allow the DPA to audit or review any SFPD policy, procedure or practice; specify the City records that the DPA may access to perform its duties; and provide that the DPA would separately submit its budget to the Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 281776, "no_votes": 67096, "total_votes": 348872, "percent_yes": 80.76773143158522, "percent_no": 19.23226856841478, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.419927", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.780412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to rename the Office of Citizen Complaints as the Department of Police Accountability (DPA); require the DPA to review the San Francisco Police Department\u2019s use-of-force policies and its handling of claims of police misconduct; allow the DPA to audit or review any SFPD policy, procedure or practice; specify the City records that the DPA may access to perform its duties; and provide that the DPA would separately submit its budget to the Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4765, "fingerprint": "2016|201600096|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600096|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0a13b6f6c1c12f30", "measure_id": "201600096", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create the position of Public Advocate, responsible for investigating and attempting to resolve public complaints concerning City services and programs; and shall it be City policy to provide the Public Advocate with sufficient funding and a support staff of at least three and up to 25 city employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 167114, "no_votes": 182807, "total_votes": 349921, "percent_yes": 47.75763672371764, "percent_no": 52.24236327628236, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.420231", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.780617", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create the position of Public Advocate, responsible for investigating and attempting to resolve public complaints concerning City services and programs; and shall it be City policy to provide the Public Advocate with sufficient funding and a support staff of at least three and up to 25 city employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4766, "fingerprint": "2016|201600097|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600097|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f4c30589ed6fe112", "measure_id": "201600097", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to establish the Dignity Fund and set aside at least $38 million a year, plus scheduled increases, from the General Fund until June 30, 2037, to pay for programs and services to assist seniors and adults with disabilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 245962, "no_votes": 125224, "total_votes": 371186, "percent_yes": 66.26381382918537, "percent_no": 33.736186170814634, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.420532", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.780800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to establish the Dignity Fund and set aside at least $38 million a year, plus scheduled increases, from the General Fund until June 30, 2037, to pay for programs and services to assist seniors and adults with disabilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4767, "fingerprint": "2016|201600098|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600098|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "be85c7729acbe7c8", "measure_id": "201600098", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Homeless Housing and Services Fund, which would provide services to the homeless including housing and Navigation Centers, programs to prevent homelessness and assistance in transitioning out of homelessness by allocating $50 million per year for 24 years, adjusted annually; and create a Transportation Improvement Fund, which would be used to improve the City\u2019s transportation network by allocating $101.6 million per year for 24 years, adjusted annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 251699, "no_votes": 123004, "total_votes": 374703, "percent_yes": 67.17293429729679, "percent_no": 32.82706570270321, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.420818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.780980", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Homeless Housing and Services Fund, which would provide services to the homeless including housing and Navigation Centers, programs to prevent homelessness and assistance in transitioning out of homelessness by allocating $50 million per year for 24 years, adjusted annually; and create a Transportation Improvement Fund, which would be used to improve the City\u2019s transportation network by allocating $101.6 million per year for 24 years, adjusted annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4760, "fingerprint": "2016|201600088|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600088|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b5f4f63481cdd287", "measure_id": "201600088", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase its sales tax by 0.75%, for a total tax of 9.25%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 131286, "no_votes": 246947, "total_votes": 378233, "percent_yes": 34.71035049823786, "percent_no": 65.28964950176214, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.417925", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.779133", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase its sales tax by 0.75%, for a total tax of 9.25%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4769, "fingerprint": "2016|201600100|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600100|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a44b109a39d5b511", "measure_id": "201600100", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City allow the Mayor to nominate four members to the SFMTA Board of Directors, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors; allow the Board of Supervisors to appoint three members; reduce from seven to six the number of votes needed for the Board of Supervisors to reject the SFMTA\u2019s proposed budget; and require the SFMTA to respond to the Board\u2019s findings and submit a revised budget if the Board of Supervisors rejected the original budget?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 159830, "no_votes": 195775, "total_votes": 355605, "percent_yes": 44.945937205607336, "percent_no": 55.054062794392664, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.421454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.781383", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City allow the Mayor to nominate four members to the SFMTA Board of Directors, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors; allow the Board of Supervisors to appoint three members; reduce from seven to six the number of votes needed for the Board of Supervisors to reject the SFMTA\u2019s proposed budget; and require the SFMTA to respond to the Board\u2019s findings and submit a revised budget if the Board of Supervisors rejected the original budget?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4768, "fingerprint": "2016|201600099|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600099|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a8578a7aac60a3c0", "measure_id": "201600099", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create the Housing and Development Commission to oversee two new departments (the Department of Economic and Workforce Development and the Department of Housing and Community Development) that would take over the duties of the Office of Economic and Workforce Development and the Mayor\u2019s Office of Housing and Community Development, which would cease to exist?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 155993, "no_votes": 196895, "total_votes": 352888, "percent_yes": 44.20467683797692, "percent_no": 55.79532316202308, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.421143", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.781173", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to create the Housing and Development Commission to oversee two new departments (the Department of Economic and Workforce Development and the Department of Housing and Community Development) that would take over the duties of the Office of Economic and Workforce Development and the Mayor\u2019s Office of Housing and Community Development, which would cease to exist?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4770, "fingerprint": "2016|201600101|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600101|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ec5e655ec09b2e3f", "measure_id": "201600101", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City allow a non-citizen resident of San Francisco who is of legal voting age and the parent, legal guardian or legally recognized caregiver of a child living in the San Francisco Unified School District to vote for members of the Board of Education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 203413, "no_votes": 170570, "total_votes": 373983, "percent_yes": 54.39097499084183, "percent_no": 45.60902500915817, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.421733", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.781584", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City allow a non-citizen resident of San Francisco who is of legal voting age and the parent, legal guardian or legally recognized caregiver of a child living in the San Francisco Unified School District to vote for members of the Board of Education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4771, "fingerprint": "2016|201600102|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600102|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "01e606088a8b89a8", "measure_id": "201600102", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City permanently exempt new office space on Candlestick Point and most of the former Navy shipyard at Hunters Point from the City\u2019s annual 950,000-square-foot limit, and provide that any new office space in this project area would not count toward the annual limit that applies in the rest of the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 187281, "no_votes": 173580, "total_votes": 360861, "percent_yes": 51.8983763831503, "percent_no": 48.1016236168497, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.422040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.781766", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City permanently exempt new office space on Candlestick Point and most of the former Navy shipyard at Hunters Point from the City\u2019s annual 950,000-square-foot limit, and provide that any new office space in this project area would not count toward the annual limit that applies in the rest of the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4772, "fingerprint": "2016|201600103|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600103|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "8075948a6859bfc8", "measure_id": "201600103", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City be prohibited from proceeding with an affordable housing project on City-owned property unless the Mayor\u2019s Office of Housing and Community Development receives at least three proposals; and shall the City incorporate into City law most current criteria for selecting a developer for affordable housing projects on City-owned property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117787, "no_votes": 242852, "total_votes": 360639, "percent_yes": 32.660638477812995, "percent_no": 67.339361522187, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.422347", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.781958", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City be prohibited from proceeding with an affordable housing project on City-owned property unless the Mayor\u2019s Office of Housing and Community Development receives at least three proposals; and shall the City incorporate into City law most current criteria for selecting a developer for affordable housing projects on City-owned property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4773, "fingerprint": "2016|201600104|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600104|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "167d7480e3e30ace", "measure_id": "201600104", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City prohibit the placement of tents on public sidewalks without a City permit and allow the City to remove unauthorized tents if the City provides 24-hour advance notice, offers shelter for all tent residents and stores the residents\u2019 personal property for up to 90 days?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 194410, "no_votes": 181138, "total_votes": 375548, "percent_yes": 51.7670177979912, "percent_no": 48.2329822020088, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.422623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.782144", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City prohibit the placement of tents on public sidewalks without a City permit and allow the City to remove unauthorized tents if the City provides 24-hour advance notice, offers shelter for all tent residents and stores the residents\u2019 personal property for up to 90 days?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4774, "fingerprint": "2016|201600105|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600105|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6e00b951c733f5e8", "measure_id": "201600105", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create a Neighborhood Crime Unit to prevent and investigate crimes that affect neighborhood safety and quality of life when the City has at least 1,971 full-duty uniformed police officers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 165723, "no_votes": 201059, "total_votes": 366782, "percent_yes": 45.18296972043339, "percent_no": 54.81703027956661, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.422893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.782336", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create a Neighborhood Crime Unit to prevent and investigate crimes that affect neighborhood safety and quality of life when the City has at least 1,971 full-duty uniformed police officers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4775, "fingerprint": "2016|201600106|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600106|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0a545fd48c8927a3", "measure_id": "201600106", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City use the money raised by the current 8% base tax on the rental of hotel rooms to provide specific funding for two different areas: arts programs and family homeless services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233099, "no_votes": 132769, "total_votes": 365868, "percent_yes": 63.71122918648256, "percent_no": 36.28877081351744, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.423158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.782524", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City use the money raised by the current 8% base tax on the rental of hotel rooms to provide specific funding for two different areas: arts programs and family homeless services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4776, "fingerprint": "2016|201600107|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600107|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ebecbaea4927ee1f", "measure_id": "201600107", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City prohibit any lobbyist from making campaign contributions to a City elected official or bundling contributions for the official, if the lobbyist was registered to lobby the official\u2019s agency; generally prohibit lobbyists from providing gifts of any value to City officials; and require lobbyists to identify the City agencies they plan to lobby?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 313411, "no_votes": 45738, "total_votes": 359149, "percent_yes": 87.26489562827683, "percent_no": 12.735104371723168, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.423432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.782712", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City prohibit any lobbyist from making campaign contributions to a City elected official or bundling contributions for the official, if the lobbyist was registered to lobby the official\u2019s agency; generally prohibit lobbyists from providing gifts of any value to City officials; and require lobbyists to identify the City agencies they plan to lobby?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4777, "fingerprint": "2016|201600108|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600108|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "19caad4452dd823e", "measure_id": "201600108", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase the income eligibility limit for on-site rental units for all new and existing affordable housing units to make them affordable for households earning up to 110% of the area median income?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126760, "no_votes": 232531, "total_votes": 359291, "percent_yes": 35.28059428151554, "percent_no": 64.71940571848447, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.423702", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.782907", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the income eligibility limit for on-site rental units for all new and existing affordable housing units to make them affordable for households earning up to 110% of the area median income?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4761, "fingerprint": "2016|201600089|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600089|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "37f6b14f3fc05691", "measure_id": "201600089", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City collect a tax of one cent per ounce from the distributors of sugar-sweetened beverages?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 237168, "no_votes": 142347, "total_votes": 379515, "percent_yes": 62.49239160507489, "percent_no": 37.50760839492511, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.418194", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.779313", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City collect a tax of one cent per ounce from the distributors of sugar-sweetened beverages?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4762, "fingerprint": "2016|201600090|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600090|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "95822562f063f176", "measure_id": "201600090", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase the transfer tax rate for sales of residential and commercial properties from 2% to 2.25% for sales from $5 million up to $10 million; from 2.5% to 2.75% for sales from $10 million up to $25 million; and from 2.5% to 3% for sales of $25 million or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 225145, "no_votes": 138414, "total_votes": 363559, "percent_yes": 61.9280501926785, "percent_no": 38.0719498073215, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.418460", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.779497", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the transfer tax rate for sales of residential and commercial properties from 2% to 2.25% for sales from $5 million up to $10 million; from 2.5% to 2.75% for sales from $10 million up to $25 million; and from 2.5% to 3% for sales of $25 million or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4778, "fingerprint": "2016|201600109|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600109|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2c1066465389e979", "measure_id": "201600109", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City require developers of projects in parts of the Mission and South of Market neighborhoods to build replacement space if they remove production, distribution and repair (PDR) uses of 5,000 square feet or more, institutional community (IC) uses of 2,500 square feet or more, or arts activities uses of any size, and to obtain a conditional use authorization before changing the property\u2019s use?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 211168, "no_votes": 141578, "total_votes": 352746, "percent_yes": 59.86403814642832, "percent_no": 40.13596185357168, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.424007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.783091", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City require developers of projects in parts of the Mission and South of Market neighborhoods to build replacement space if they remove production, distribution and repair (PDR) uses of 5,000 square feet or more, institutional community (IC) uses of 2,500 square feet or more, or arts activities uses of any size, and to obtain a conditional use authorization before changing the property\u2019s use?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4789, "fingerprint": "2016|201600768|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600768|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "b9586eca319585dc", "measure_id": "201600768", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at local high schools; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace leaky roofs; provide career technical education classrooms for job training; renovate deteriorating plumbing/sewer systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements shall Galt Joint Union High School District issue $36,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with an independent oversight committee, NO money for administrative salaries, all funds locally-controlled and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1175, "no_votes": 986, "total_votes": 2161, "percent_yes": 54.37297547431744, "percent_no": 45.62702452568256, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.427960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.785546", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at local high schools; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace leaky roofs; provide career technical education classrooms for job training; renovate deteriorating plumbing/sewer systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements shall Galt Joint Union High School District issue $36,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with an independent oversight committee, NO money for administrative salaries, all funds locally-controlled and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4788, "fingerprint": "2016|201600767|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600767|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "6ed8c62805cf30fb", "measure_id": "201600767", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for pre-kindergarten through eighth grade students shall Galt Joint Union Elementary School District be authorized to modernize and upgrade classrooms and school facilities for 21st Century learning; replace portables and leaky roofs; upgrade outdated electrical, heating/air conditioning and plumbing; make safety/security and technology classroom improvements, by issuing $19,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and audits, NO money for employee salaries, and all funds benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 357, "no_votes": 307, "total_votes": 664, "percent_yes": 53.765060240963855, "percent_no": 46.234939759036145, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.427654", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.785349", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for pre-kindergarten through eighth grade students shall Galt Joint Union Elementary School District be authorized to modernize and upgrade classrooms and school facilities for 21st Century learning; replace portables and leaky roofs; upgrade outdated electrical, heating/air conditioning and plumbing; make safety/security and technology classroom improvements, by issuing $19,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and audits, NO money for employee salaries, and all funds benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4787, "fingerprint": "2016|201600766|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600766|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "919e4880d4e46aa2", "measure_id": "201600766", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure high-quality education for all students, with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Lammersville Joint Unified School District provide classrooms/facilities for science, technology, engineering and math to prepare students for college and careers; Mountain House High School\u2019s career technical educational facilities/library; and provide high-speed wireless networks to support instructional technology; by issuing $56,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1489, "no_votes": 910, "total_votes": 2399, "percent_yes": 62.06752813672364, "percent_no": 37.93247186327636, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.427276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.785150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure high-quality education for all students, with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Lammersville Joint Unified School District provide classrooms/facilities for science, technology, engineering and math to prepare students for college and careers; Mountain House High School\u2019s career technical educational facilities/library; and provide high-speed wireless networks to support instructional technology; by issuing $56,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4781, "fingerprint": "2016|201600436|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600436|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "00464594956d2d58", "measure_id": "201600436", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance 2016-06-07-1212 to enhance Stockton\u2019s library and recreation services, including safe after-school and summer programs for children and teens, homework centers, children\u2019s story times, increased public computer access/wireless connectivity, and enhanced evening and weekend hours at libraries and recreation centers, funded by a 1/4-cent transaction and use (sales) tax, generating $9 million annually for 16 years, with all funds staying local and expenditures subject to an annual audit be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59026, "no_votes": 18636, "total_votes": 77662, "percent_yes": 76.0037083773274, "percent_no": 23.9962916226726, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.425445", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.784034", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance 2016-06-07-1212 to enhance Stockton\u2019s library and recreation services, including safe after-school and summer programs for children and teens, homework centers, children\u2019s story times, increased public computer access/wireless connectivity, and enhanced evening and weekend hours at libraries and recreation centers, funded by a 1/4-cent transaction and use (sales) tax, generating $9 million annually for 16 years, with all funds staying local and expenditures subject to an annual audit be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4784, "fingerprint": "2016|201600439|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600439|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "62f471a9efd431fe", "measure_id": "201600439", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be revised to establish an advisory redistricting commission; require City Council approval of City Council district boundaries; provide for the election of City Council exclusively by district and to rephrase existing term limit provisions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44023, "no_votes": 29186, "total_votes": 73209, "percent_yes": 60.133316941906045, "percent_no": 39.866683058093955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.426419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.784596", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be revised to establish an advisory redistricting commission; require City Council approval of City Council district boundaries; provide for the election of City Council exclusively by district and to rephrase existing term limit provisions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4785, "fingerprint": "2016|201600440|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600440|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "30a6a29959df12cd", "measure_id": "201600440", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be revised to alter the process for adjusting compensation of the Mayor and Council, amend the required notice for sale or lease of City property, provide for annual funding of three positions in the Mayor\u2019s Office, require adoption of a fiscal reserve policy and amend procedures applicable to the adoption, administration and auditing of the City budget?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41912, "no_votes": 30632, "total_votes": 72544, "percent_yes": 57.774591971768864, "percent_no": 42.225408028231136, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.426727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.784779", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be revised to alter the process for adjusting compensation of the Mayor and Council, amend the required notice for sale or lease of City property, provide for annual funding of three positions in the Mayor\u2019s Office, require adoption of a fiscal reserve policy and amend procedures applicable to the adoption, administration and auditing of the City budget?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4786, "fingerprint": "2016|201600441|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600441|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "05c2f6d0ad7b3d8c", "measure_id": "201600441", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Stockton Municipal Code be revised to overturn the ban on medical cannabis dispensaries; to allow within the city four medical cannabis dispensaries in certain commercial and industrial zones and four cultivation sites in certain industrial zones subject to locational restrictions and the issuance of a use permit, an operators permit, and employee permits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43235, "no_votes": 32960, "total_votes": 76195, "percent_yes": 56.74256841000066, "percent_no": 43.25743158999934, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.426993", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.784968", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Stockton Municipal Code be revised to overturn the ban on medical cannabis dispensaries; to allow within the city four medical cannabis dispensaries in certain commercial and industrial zones and four cultivation sites in certain industrial zones subject to locational restrictions and the issuance of a use permit, an operators permit, and employee permits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4782, "fingerprint": "2016|201600437|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600437|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "2a217d16d18a4563", "measure_id": "201600437", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2016-06-28-1503 be adopted to amend provisions of the City of Stockton Municipal Code governing businesses subject to the marijuana business license tax and to increase the rate for the medical cannabis business license tax to a minimum of $35.00 and a maximum of $50.00 per $1,000 of the annual gross receipts of medical cannabis businesses, estimated to raise $672,000-$1,000,000 annually for general City services, which tax shall continue until repealed by the City Council or City voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48439, "no_votes": 27191, "total_votes": 75630, "percent_yes": 64.04733571334127, "percent_no": 35.95266428665873, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.425716", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.784222", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2016-06-28-1503 be adopted to amend provisions of the City of Stockton Municipal Code governing businesses subject to the marijuana business license tax and to increase the rate for the medical cannabis business license tax to a minimum of $35.00 and a maximum of $50.00 per $1,000 of the annual gross receipts of medical cannabis businesses, estimated to raise $672,000-$1,000,000 annually for general City services, which tax shall continue until repealed by the City Council or City voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4779, "fingerprint": "2016|201600434|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600434|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "cec15be84519d2b1", "measure_id": "201600434", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Lodi replace outdated playgrounds, repair eroded riverbank at Lodi Lake, repair and expand park trail systems, replace park restrooms and drinking fountains, and improve park parking lots, roadways, landscaping, and infrastructure, by enacting a one-eighth cent per dollar (0.125%) transactions and use (\u201csales\u201d) tax, estimated to raise $1,400,000 annually, to sunset in fifteen (15) years, with all revenue exclusively applied to these specific purposes, subject to citizen oversight and annual audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13699, "no_votes": 8166, "total_votes": 21865, "percent_yes": 62.6526412074091, "percent_no": 37.3473587925909, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.424889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.783656", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Lodi replace outdated playgrounds, repair eroded riverbank at Lodi Lake, repair and expand park trail systems, replace park restrooms and drinking fountains, and improve park parking lots, roadways, landscaping, and infrastructure, by enacting a one-eighth cent per dollar (0.125%) transactions and use (\u201csales\u201d) tax, estimated to raise $1,400,000 annually, to sunset in fifteen (15) years, with all revenue exclusively applied to these specific purposes, subject to citizen oversight and annual audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4780, "fingerprint": "2016|201600435|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600435|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "527ec5214ec0d6ba", "measure_id": "201600435", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Lodi fight crime and expand programs to reduce gang violence by hiring additional police and a gang intervention worker, restore downtown Fire Engine 1 service, and increase training, by enacting a one-quarter cent per dollar (0.25%) transactions and use (\u201csales\u201d) tax, estimated to raise $2,800,000 annually, 64% to police, 36% to fire, sunset in 15 years, all revenue exclusively applied to these specific purposes, subject to citizen oversight and annual audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14115, "no_votes": 7077, "total_votes": 21192, "percent_yes": 66.6053227633069, "percent_no": 33.3946772366931, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.425168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.783845", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Lodi fight crime and expand programs to reduce gang violence by hiring additional police and a gang intervention worker, restore downtown Fire Engine 1 service, and increase training, by enacting a one-quarter cent per dollar (0.25%) transactions and use (\u201csales\u201d) tax, estimated to raise $2,800,000 annually, 64% to police, 36% to fire, sunset in 15 years, all revenue exclusively applied to these specific purposes, subject to citizen oversight and annual audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4790, "fingerprint": "2016|201600769|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600769|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "4c3d84f2b4330521", "measure_id": "201600769", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade aging classrooms in local schools to prepare students for college and careers, retain/attract quality teachers and improve student health/safety by removing mold/asbestos/lead paint, repairing leaky roofs, updating classrooms and acquiring/constructing/modernizing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Lodi Unified School District issue $281,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36550, "no_votes": 19526, "total_votes": 56076, "percent_yes": 65.17939938654683, "percent_no": 34.820600613453166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.428235", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.785728", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade aging classrooms in local schools to prepare students for college and careers, retain/attract quality teachers and improve student health/safety by removing mold/asbestos/lead paint, repairing leaky roofs, updating classrooms and acquiring/constructing/modernizing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Lodi Unified School District issue $281,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4783, "fingerprint": "2016|201600438|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600438|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "b9f35bc0e0e0fbcd", "measure_id": "201600438", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for City services/facilities, including: police (patrol, 911, command, gang/narcotics enforcement, crime investigations, other police services); fire protection, emergency, and other fire services; support services; street, median, and park repair/maintenance; senior/youth services; planning and business retention/attraction; building facilities (such as parks/sports fields); other general services; shall the City of Tracy enact a 1/2\u00a2 sales tax for 20 years, providing $7 million dollars annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17339, "no_votes": 9895, "total_votes": 27234, "percent_yes": 63.666740104281416, "percent_no": 36.333259895718584, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.426038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.784406", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for City services/facilities, including: police (patrol, 911, command, gang/narcotics enforcement, crime investigations, other police services); fire protection, emergency, and other fire services; support services; street, median, and park repair/maintenance; senior/youth services; planning and business retention/attraction; building facilities (such as parks/sports fields); other general services; shall the City of Tracy enact a 1/2\u00a2 sales tax for 20 years, providing $7 million dollars annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4796, "fingerprint": "2016|201600772|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600772|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "fa48b330f8d794c9", "measure_id": "201600772", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, improve and equip Lillian Larsen and Cappy Culver Schools including new classrooms for technology, science and vocational training, security fencing for improved student safety, and upgraded heating/air conditioning systems, shall San Miguel Joint Union School District be authorized to issue $5.9 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1270, "no_votes": 768, "total_votes": 2038, "percent_yes": 62.31599607458293, "percent_no": 37.68400392541707, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.430207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.786853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, improve and equip Lillian Larsen and Cappy Culver Schools including new classrooms for technology, science and vocational training, security fencing for improved student safety, and upgraded heating/air conditioning systems, shall San Miguel Joint Union School District be authorized to issue $5.9 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4793, "fingerprint": "2016|201600443|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600443|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "680ba4aea1005657", "measure_id": "201600443", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arroyo Grande be authorized to purchase water from the State Water Project to supplement the City's existing water supplies during local water emergencies declared by the Arroyo Grande City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8253, "no_votes": 1297, "total_votes": 9550, "percent_yes": 86.41884816753927, "percent_no": 13.581151832460733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.429130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.786295", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arroyo Grande be authorized to purchase water from the State Water Project to supplement the City's existing water supplies during local water emergencies declared by the Arroyo Grande City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4794, "fingerprint": "2016|201600444|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600444|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201600444", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6597, "no_votes": 6484, "total_votes": 13081, "percent_yes": 50.43192416481921, "percent_no": 49.56807583518079, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.429401", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.786486", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4795, "fingerprint": "2016|201600445|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600445|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201600445", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6315, "no_votes": 6772, "total_votes": 13087, "percent_yes": 48.25399251165279, "percent_no": 51.74600748834721, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.429849", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.786669", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4798, "fingerprint": "2016|201600770|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600770|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "d1a65b1f1a8a8890", "measure_id": "201600770", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize aging classrooms and facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the State, repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing/ electrical systems, improve student safety and campus security, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities/ equipment, upgrade classrooms/ science labs/ career/ vocational facilities and computer systems to keep pace with technology, shall Lucia Mar Unified School District issue $170,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24656, "no_votes": 12934, "total_votes": 37590, "percent_yes": 65.59191274275074, "percent_no": 34.408087257249264, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.430772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.787230", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize aging classrooms and facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the State, repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing/ electrical systems, improve student safety and campus security, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities/ equipment, upgrade classrooms/ science labs/ career/ vocational facilities and computer systems to keep pace with technology, shall Lucia Mar Unified School District issue $170,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4791, "fingerprint": "2016|201600110|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600110|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "ae6878bddfedaaa6", "measure_id": "201600110", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve our region\u2019s transportation system by: Fixing potholes, repaving local streets, relieving traffic congestion; Improving street, highway and bridge safety; Making bike and transit improvements within and between communities; Increasing senior, veterans, disabled and student transit; and Providing safe routes to school. Shall San Luis Obispo County voters enact a half cent transportation sales tax, providing $25,000,000 annually for nine (9) years, requiring independent citizens\u2019 oversight, where all funds stay local and cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86038, "no_votes": 43714, "total_votes": 129752, "percent_yes": 66.30957518959245, "percent_no": 33.69042481040755, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.428514", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.785921", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve our region\u2019s transportation system by: Fixing potholes, repaving local streets, relieving traffic congestion; Improving street, highway and bridge safety; Making bike and transit improvements within and between communities; Increasing senior, veterans, disabled and student transit; and Providing safe routes to school. Shall San Luis Obispo County voters enact a half cent transportation sales tax, providing $25,000,000 annually for nine (9) years, requiring independent citizens\u2019 oversight, where all funds stay local and cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4797, "fingerprint": "2016|201600773|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600773|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "595d157dfc70356c", "measure_id": "201600773", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair leaky pipes, deteriorating septic systems, aging roofs and inefficient heating/air-conditioning; upgrade portable classrooms; install emergency communication systems and remove asbestos; and qualify for State matching funds at Shandon Elementary, Parkfield Elementary and Shandon High Schools; shall Shandon Joint Unified School District issue $3.15 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 375, "no_votes": 129, "total_votes": 504, "percent_yes": 74.40476190476191, "percent_no": 25.595238095238088, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.430494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.787040", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair leaky pipes, deteriorating septic systems, aging roofs and inefficient heating/air-conditioning; upgrade portable classrooms; install emergency communication systems and remove asbestos; and qualify for State matching funds at Shandon Elementary, Parkfield Elementary and Shandon High Schools; shall Shandon Joint Unified School District issue $3.15 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4792, "fingerprint": "2016|201600442|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600442|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "9854d5f32c356b8e", "measure_id": "201600442", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Grover Beach City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing an annual \"Commercial Cannabis Tax\" on medical marijuana businesses at 5% of gross receipts and non-medical marijuana businesses, where permissible by law, at 10% of gross receipts; on cultivation and nurseries at $25.00 per square foot for the first 5,000 square feet and $10.00 per square foot thereafter? Tax is estimated to generate one to two million dollars annually, will not sunset, and may be adjusted annually by CPI?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3824, "no_votes": 1593, "total_votes": 5417, "percent_yes": 70.59257891822041, "percent_no": 29.40742108177959, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.428788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.786112", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Grover Beach City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing an annual \"Commercial Cannabis Tax\" on medical marijuana businesses at 5% of gross receipts and non-medical marijuana businesses, where permissible by law, at 10% of gross receipts; on cultivation and nurseries at $25.00 per square foot for the first 5,000 square feet and $10.00 per square foot thereafter? Tax is estimated to generate one to two million dollars annually, will not sunset, and may be adjusted annually by CPI?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4799, "fingerprint": "2016|201600771|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600771|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "2ced5defaa2a1b35", "measure_id": "201600771", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, acquire, upgrade, equip and construct school classrooms and facilities including science, technology, engineering, arts, and math classrooms; expand career technical education; replace aging portables, fix leaky roofs, repair deteriorating plumbing/ electrical wiring; and improve building earthquake safety, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No.1 of Paso Robles Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $95,000,000 of bonds with legal interest rates, independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, all funds spent on local schools and not for administrator salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10343, "no_votes": 7623, "total_votes": 17966, "percent_yes": 57.569854168985856, "percent_no": 42.430145831014144, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.431142", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.787423", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, acquire, upgrade, equip and construct school classrooms and facilities including science, technology, engineering, arts, and math classrooms; expand career technical education; replace aging portables, fix leaky roofs, repair deteriorating plumbing/ electrical wiring; and improve building earthquake safety, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No.1 of Paso Robles Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $95,000,000 of bonds with legal interest rates, independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, all funds spent on local schools and not for administrator salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4815, "fingerprint": "2016|201600775|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600775|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "75ab5cc44bbe76de", "measure_id": "201600775", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain our community commitment to existing small class sizes, high qualify teachers and comprehensive academic programs, and renew the expiring educational special tax, shall the Menlo Park City Elementary School District continue to levy at the current annual rate of $201.38 per parcel, spent only on teachers and educational programs, beginning July 1, 2016, adjusted annually for inflation, with an exemption available to individuals 65 and over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3557, "no_votes": 2340, "total_votes": 5897, "percent_yes": 60.31880617263015, "percent_no": 39.68119382736985, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.435691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.790899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain our community commitment to existing small class sizes, high qualify teachers and comprehensive academic programs, and renew the expiring educational special tax, shall the Menlo Park City Elementary School District continue to levy at the current annual rate of $201.38 per parcel, spent only on teachers and educational programs, beginning July 1, 2016, adjusted annually for inflation, with an exemption available to individuals 65 and over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4800, "fingerprint": "2016|201600112|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600112|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c9ac6c8127701fb7", "measure_id": "201600112", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126943, "no_votes": 49422, "total_votes": 176365, "percent_yes": 71.97743316417656, "percent_no": 28.02256683582344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.431412", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.787875", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4814, "fingerprint": "2016|201600774|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600774|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "02e5f23b39128dcd", "measure_id": "201600774", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Brisbane School District renew its current parcel tax with an inflation increase by levying a special tax of not more than $131 annually per parcel, an estimated $425,000, to provide teachers/instructional aides for reading, music, and art; providing exemptions for senior citizens? Shall the annual appropriation limit be raised between July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2022, in an amount equal to levy of said tax, with funds spent exclusively on Brisbane School District and not used for any other purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1046, "no_votes": 425, "total_votes": 1471, "percent_yes": 71.10808973487424, "percent_no": 28.89191026512576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.435423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.790713", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Brisbane School District renew its current parcel tax with an inflation increase by levying a special tax of not more than $131 annually per parcel, an estimated $425,000, to provide teachers/instructional aides for reading, music, and art; providing exemptions for senior citizens? Shall the annual appropriation limit be raised between July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2022, in an amount equal to levy of said tax, with funds spent exclusively on Brisbane School District and not used for any other purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4816, "fingerprint": "2016|201600776|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600776|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "53655dc1b8cde97b", "measure_id": "201600776", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare for future student enrollment increases beyond the current 2,938 students and maintain our community commitment to existing small class sizes, high quality teachers and comprehensive programs, shall the Menlo Park City Elementary School District levy a supplemental special tax of $2.20 per parcel for each additional student to a maximum of 213 students, spent only on teachers and educational programs, beginning July 1, 2016, adjusted annually for inflation, with an exemption available to individuals 65 and over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3183, "no_votes": 2706, "total_votes": 5889, "percent_yes": 54.04992358634743, "percent_no": 45.95007641365257, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.435984", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.791082", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare for future student enrollment increases beyond the current 2,938 students and maintain our community commitment to existing small class sizes, high quality teachers and comprehensive programs, shall the Menlo Park City Elementary School District levy a supplemental special tax of $2.20 per parcel for each additional student to a maximum of 213 students, spent only on teachers and educational programs, beginning July 1, 2016, adjusted annually for inflation, with an exemption available to individuals 65 and over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4818, "fingerprint": "2016|201600778|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600778|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "82ca561093672cbf", "measure_id": "201600778", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing taxes, to protect approximately $1.3 million annual local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Pacifica School District renew expiring local funding, protect quality education in local elementary/middle schools, enhance math, science, history, reading/writing programs, attract/retain qualified teachers, support well-rounded education like art/music programs, computer/technology instruction, libraries and support struggling students, at $118 annually for 10 years, with citizen oversight, senior citizen exemptions, and no funds for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9425, "no_votes": 2737, "total_votes": 12162, "percent_yes": 77.49547771748068, "percent_no": 22.504522282519318, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.436555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.791447", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing taxes, to protect approximately $1.3 million annual local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Pacifica School District renew expiring local funding, protect quality education in local elementary/middle schools, enhance math, science, history, reading/writing programs, attract/retain qualified teachers, support well-rounded education like art/music programs, computer/technology instruction, libraries and support struggling students, at $118 annually for 10 years, with citizen oversight, senior citizen exemptions, and no funds for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4817, "fingerprint": "2016|201600777|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600777|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "96bc595dc135530e", "measure_id": "201600777", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education for all students with funds that cannot be taken by the state by: enhancing math, science, reading/writing skills; providing career training, college preparation/21st-century computer instruction; and attracting/retaining qualified teachers, shall Jefferson Union High School District replace its expiring parcel tax at $60 per parcel annually for 10 years, with exemptions, including seniors, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators and all funds benefitting students in Brisbane, Broadmoor, Coloma, Daly City and Pacifica?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21917, "no_votes": 7639, "total_votes": 29556, "percent_yes": 74.15414805792395, "percent_no": 25.845851942076052, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.436283", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.791264", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education for all students with funds that cannot be taken by the state by: enhancing math, science, reading/writing skills; providing career training, college preparation/21st-century computer instruction; and attracting/retaining qualified teachers, shall Jefferson Union High School District replace its expiring parcel tax at $60 per parcel annually for 10 years, with exemptions, including seniors, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators and all funds benefitting students in Brisbane, Broadmoor, Coloma, Daly City and Pacifica?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4803, "fingerprint": "2016|201600446|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600446|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "af326bc92ca7a6c2", "measure_id": "201600446", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the 'Taxpayer Protection Act' be adopted as the official policy of the people of Half Moon Bay?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1612, "no_votes": 2164, "total_votes": 3776, "percent_yes": 42.690677966101696, "percent_no": 57.309322033898304, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.432276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.788590", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the 'Taxpayer Protection Act' be adopted as the official policy of the people of Half Moon Bay?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4801, "fingerprint": "2016|201600111|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600111|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "3ff6b3fde4b68a2b", "measure_id": "201600111", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 074361 of the County of San Mateo continuing the levy of a special tax for four years at a maximum rate of $65 per parcel per year for extended police and structural fire protection services be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1153, "no_votes": 360, "total_votes": 1513, "percent_yes": 76.20621282220753, "percent_no": 23.793787177792467, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.431684", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.788077", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 074361 of the County of San Mateo continuing the levy of a special tax for four years at a maximum rate of $65 per parcel per year for extended police and structural fire protection services be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4819, "fingerprint": "2016|201600779|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600779|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "dd200c49497dbfd9", "measure_id": "201600779", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain warm, safe, and dry schools; repair aging facilities; upgrade school safety; create student-centered 21st Century classrooms; improve technology, computer and science labs; increase energy efficiency; and repair, construct, acquire, and retrofit school facilities, sites, and equipment; shall the Ravenswood City School District issue $26 million in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits and a citizens' oversight committee to ensure funds are only spent on local school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3394, "no_votes": 521, "total_votes": 3915, "percent_yes": 86.69220945083013, "percent_no": 13.307790549169866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.436818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.791628", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain warm, safe, and dry schools; repair aging facilities; upgrade school safety; create student-centered 21st Century classrooms; improve technology, computer and science labs; increase energy efficiency; and repair, construct, acquire, and retrofit school facilities, sites, and equipment; shall the Ravenswood City School District issue $26 million in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits and a citizens' oversight committee to ensure funds are only spent on local school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4804, "fingerprint": "2016|201600447|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600447|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ca01bbd6201095d8", "measure_id": "201600447", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide local funding for maintaining general City of Belmont services/facilities such as fixing potholes, repairing 69 miles of city streets, maintaining 911 emergency response, repairing deteriorating storm drains, reducing traffic congestion/improving public safety on neighborhood streets, shall Belmont enact a 1/2 cent sales tax providing $1,300,000 annually for 30 years, requiring citizens' oversight, independent audits, with all funds for local City of Belmont services and no funds for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7018, "no_votes": 5687, "total_votes": 12705, "percent_yes": 55.23809523809524, "percent_no": 44.76190476190476, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.432552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.788865", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide local funding for maintaining general City of Belmont services/facilities such as fixing potholes, repairing 69 miles of city streets, maintaining 911 emergency response, repairing deteriorating storm drains, reducing traffic congestion/improving public safety on neighborhood streets, shall Belmont enact a 1/2 cent sales tax providing $1,300,000 annually for 30 years, requiring citizens' oversight, independent audits, with all funds for local City of Belmont services and no funds for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4813, "fingerprint": "2016|201600456|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600456|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d75c4c7fb2c534b1", "measure_id": "201600456", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the 2010 Rent Stabilization and Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance be strengthened by simplifying administrative processes and procedures, defining \"maximum allowable rent,\" revising the registration fee pass-through, eliminating annual registration requirements, streamlining annual general adjustment calculations, addressing nuisance-based tenancy termination, strengthening informational notice provisions, and authorizing the City Council to revise the Ordinance when in conflict with federal or state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4998, "no_votes": 1237, "total_votes": 6235, "percent_yes": 80.16038492381716, "percent_no": 19.839615076182838, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.435158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.790531", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the 2010 Rent Stabilization and Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance be strengthened by simplifying administrative processes and procedures, defining \"maximum allowable rent,\" revising the registration fee pass-through, eliminating annual registration requirements, streamlining annual general adjustment calculations, addressing nuisance-based tenancy termination, strengthening informational notice provisions, and authorizing the City Council to revise the Ordinance when in conflict with federal or state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4802, "fingerprint": "2016|201600113|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600113|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c5ffc49e7a0faac2", "measure_id": "201600113", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To ensure San Mateo County quality of life by retaining/improving critical facilities/services, such as: providing affordable homes for seniors, people with disablilties, veterans, families; enhancing public transit; combatting human trafficking; addressing sea level rise; maintaining safe schools and neighborhoods; high-quality preschool and reading programs; park maintenance; and low-income healthcare, shall San Mateo County extend the existing hal-cent sales tax, without increasing the rate, providing $85,000,000 annually for 20 years that the State cannot take away?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 206910, "no_votes": 87117, "total_votes": 294027, "percent_yes": 70.37108836943547, "percent_no": 29.62891163056453, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.431951", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.788269", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure San Mateo County quality of life by retaining/improving critical facilities/services, such as: providing affordable homes for seniors, people with disablilties, veterans, families; enhancing public transit; combatting human trafficking; addressing sea level rise; maintaining safe schools and neighborhoods; high-quality preschool and reading programs; park maintenance; and low-income healthcare, shall San Mateo County extend the existing hal-cent sales tax, without increasing the rate, providing $85,000,000 annually for 20 years that the State cannot take away?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4809, "fingerprint": "2016|201600452|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600452|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8d512d670f7df179", "measure_id": "201600452", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter amendment eliminating the requirement that the City maintain its own separate Fire Department, thereby allowing the City to enter into an agreement with other agencies to form a new entity for the provision of fire services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22576, "no_votes": 15201, "total_votes": 37777, "percent_yes": 59.76123037827249, "percent_no": 40.23876962172751, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.433967", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.789799", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter amendment eliminating the requirement that the City maintain its own separate Fire Department, thereby allowing the City to enter into an agreement with other agencies to form a new entity for the provision of fire services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4823, "fingerprint": "2016|201600783|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600783|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5f310f18f610c8f5", "measure_id": "201600783", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update schools and provide access for students with disabilities, remove lead paint/asbestos, fix leaky roofd, update classrooms, libraries, labs/facilities to meet current earthquake, fire/safety codes, replace old portable classrooms, upgrade science labs, shall Burlingame Elementary School District issue $56,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, that cannot be taken by the State, to renovate, construct/acquire local neighborhood schools, sites, equipment/facilities, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10706, "no_votes": 3675, "total_votes": 14381, "percent_yes": 74.44544885612962, "percent_no": 25.554551143870384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.437932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.792352", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update schools and provide access for students with disabilities, remove lead paint/asbestos, fix leaky roofd, update classrooms, libraries, labs/facilities to meet current earthquake, fire/safety codes, replace old portable classrooms, upgrade science labs, shall Burlingame Elementary School District issue $56,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, that cannot be taken by the State, to renovate, construct/acquire local neighborhood schools, sites, equipment/facilities, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4808, "fingerprint": "2016|201600451|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600451|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ffffa6acdce9d76f", "measure_id": "201600451", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To build a new Library that will eliminate building deficiencies like leaky roofs and deteriorating electrical wiring; improve earthquake/fire safety and disability access; enable modern computer technology and internet access; and provide safe spaces and study areas for teens and children seven days a week; shall the City of Pacifica issue $33,500,000 in general obligation bonds at legal rates, subject to financial audits and citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10368, "no_votes": 8628, "total_votes": 18996, "percent_yes": 54.57991156032848, "percent_no": 45.42008843967152, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.433704", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.789619", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a new Library that will eliminate building deficiencies like leaky roofs and deteriorating electrical wiring; improve earthquake/fire safety and disability access; enable modern computer technology and internet access; and provide safe spaces and study areas for teens and children seven days a week; shall the City of Pacifica issue $33,500,000 in general obligation bonds at legal rates, subject to financial audits and citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4806, "fingerprint": "2016|201600449|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600449|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "bf86f5387853934b", "measure_id": "201600449", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the business license tax a landlord with five or more residential rental units pays the City of East Palo Alto, which shall not be passed on to tennants, be set at 1.5% of gross receipts, until terminated by the voters or reduced by the Council, and the approximately $600,000 rasied annually used as directed by the City Council for general fund purposes, such as funding programs to increase affordable housing, and protect local residents from displacement and from homelessness?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4862, "no_votes": 1408, "total_votes": 6270, "percent_yes": 77.54385964912281, "percent_no": 22.45614035087719, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.433086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.789239", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the business license tax a landlord with five or more residential rental units pays the City of East Palo Alto, which shall not be passed on to tennants, be set at 1.5% of gross receipts, until terminated by the voters or reduced by the Council, and the approximately $600,000 rasied annually used as directed by the City Council for general fund purposes, such as funding programs to increase affordable housing, and protect local residents from displacement and from homelessness?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4807, "fingerprint": "2016|201600450|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600450|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7888472fed43aadf", "measure_id": "201600450", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To make neighborhoods safer by maintaining rapid police response times/number of police officers patrolling neighborhood streets; repairing streets/potholes; updating drinking water/storm drain infrastructure; maintaining youth/senior programs and other vital City services, shall East Palo Alto enact a one-half cent (1/2%) sales tax that can only be ended by voters providing about $1,800,000 annually, with citizens' oversight, annual independent audits, all fund benefitting East Palo Alto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10368, "no_votes": 8628, "total_votes": 18996, "percent_yes": 54.57991156032848, "percent_no": 45.42008843967152, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.433426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.789434", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make neighborhoods safer by maintaining rapid police response times/number of police officers patrolling neighborhood streets; repairing streets/potholes; updating drinking water/storm drain infrastructure; maintaining youth/senior programs and other vital City services, shall East Palo Alto enact a one-half cent (1/2%) sales tax that can only be ended by voters providing about $1,800,000 annually, with citizens' oversight, annual independent audits, all fund benefitting East Palo Alto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4810, "fingerprint": "2016|201600453|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600453|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e88e42d79189e12c", "measure_id": "201600453", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the charter amendment adding Chapter XI to the San Mateo City Charter to enact rent regulations applicable to apartment housing with an initial certificate of occupancy dated before February 1,1995; and just cause for eviction requirements applicable to apartment housing with an initial certificate of occupancy dated before the date the measure becomes effective; and establishing a Rental Housing Commission To administer and implement these regulations and requirements be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16053, "no_votes": 24073, "total_votes": 40126, "percent_yes": 40.00647958929372, "percent_no": 59.99352041070628, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.434272", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.789981", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the charter amendment adding Chapter XI to the San Mateo City Charter to enact rent regulations applicable to apartment housing with an initial certificate of occupancy dated before February 1,1995; and just cause for eviction requirements applicable to apartment housing with an initial certificate of occupancy dated before the date the measure becomes effective; and establishing a Rental Housing Commission To administer and implement these regulations and requirements be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4812, "fingerprint": "2016|201600455|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600455|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8e23851f9404f693", "measure_id": "201600455", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance (a) enacting rent stabilization with an annual maximum increase of 4% for most multi-family rental residences with certificates of occupancy before February 1, 1995; (b) establishing just cause for eviction restrictions on most rental residential units, including single family homes and multi-family residences built after 1995; (c) creating a Commission authorized to enact regulations and set fees to implement the ordinance; and (d) superseding prior restrictions on the passage of rent control be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4668, "no_votes": 9350, "total_votes": 14018, "percent_yes": 33.30004280211157, "percent_no": 66.69995719788844, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.434835", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.790347", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance (a) enacting rent stabilization with an annual maximum increase of 4% for most multi-family rental residences with certificates of occupancy before February 1, 1995; (b) establishing just cause for eviction restrictions on most rental residential units, including single family homes and multi-family residences built after 1995; (c) creating a Commission authorized to enact regulations and set fees to implement the ordinance; and (d) superseding prior restrictions on the passage of rent control be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4822, "fingerprint": "2016|201600782|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600782|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0bfe1f2bfb884644", "measure_id": "201600782", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at local schools with funding that cannot be taken by the state; finish construction of a new school; improve student access to modern technology; construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities that meet all health, safety and handicapped accessibility (ADA) requirements; shall the Bayshore Elementary School District isse $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight and NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1225, "no_votes": 274, "total_votes": 1499, "percent_yes": 81.72114743162108, "percent_no": 18.278852568378923, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.437670", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.792172", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at local schools with funding that cannot be taken by the state; finish construction of a new school; improve student access to modern technology; construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities that meet all health, safety and handicapped accessibility (ADA) requirements; shall the Bayshore Elementary School District isse $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight and NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4820, "fingerprint": "2016|201600780|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600780|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "1ff54fffc5e7a028", "measure_id": "201600780", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and enhance quality education with local funding the State cannot take away by protecting core academics in math, science, technology, reading and writing; attracting and retaining high quality teachers; supporting students struggling to read at grade level; and providing after-school/homework programs, shall Jefferson 'Elementary School District levy $68 per parcel annually, for nine years, exempting seniors, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrators and all funds for our community's elementary and middle schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19060, "no_votes": 5837, "total_votes": 24897, "percent_yes": 76.55540828212234, "percent_no": 23.444591717877657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.437080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.791809", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and enhance quality education with local funding the State cannot take away by protecting core academics in math, science, technology, reading and writing; attracting and retaining high quality teachers; supporting students struggling to read at grade level; and providing after-school/homework programs, shall Jefferson 'Elementary School District levy $68 per parcel annually, for nine years, exempting seniors, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrators and all funds for our community's elementary and middle schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4821, "fingerprint": "2016|201600781|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600781|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a88534759918bef8", "measure_id": "201600781", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education for local elementary and middle school students, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, enhance reading, writing. Math, and science skills; attract and retain qualified teachers; and support arts and music programs; shall the REdwood City Elementary School District renew its educational parcel tax at $85, providing $1,900,000 annually for 14 years, exempting seniors, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, no money for administrators and all money benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30053, "no_votes": 7602, "total_votes": 37655, "percent_yes": 79.81144602310451, "percent_no": 20.18855397689549, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.437404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.791990", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education for local elementary and middle school students, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, enhance reading, writing. Math, and science skills; attract and retain qualified teachers; and support arts and music programs; shall the REdwood City Elementary School District renew its educational parcel tax at $85, providing $1,900,000 annually for 14 years, exempting seniors, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, no money for administrators and all money benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4805, "fingerprint": "2016|201600448|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600448|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a42d0d36a134bfd7", "measure_id": "201600448", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Public Safety Parcel Tax Ordinance imposing a flat tax on each parcel of real property within the City of Daly City at the rate of $162.00 per parcel, per year, for a period of five years, to be billed on the annual property tax bill sent by the tax collector of San Mateo County, thereby generating an estimated $3.8 million annually to restore 10 specific police and fire personnel and related operational costs, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13669, "no_votes": 15461, "total_votes": 29130, "percent_yes": 46.92413319601785, "percent_no": 53.07586680398215, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.432819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.789056", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Public Safety Parcel Tax Ordinance imposing a flat tax on each parcel of real property within the City of Daly City at the rate of $162.00 per parcel, per year, for a period of five years, to be billed on the annual property tax bill sent by the tax collector of San Mateo County, thereby generating an estimated $3.8 million annually to restore 10 specific police and fire personnel and related operational costs, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4811, "fingerprint": "2016|201600454|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600454|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "88c990e3fbfe505e", "measure_id": "201600454", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative which amends Ordinance Number 391-C.S. to authorize up to 206 multi-family units of residential development at the Rockaway Quarry only under certain conditions specified in the Initiative measure entitled \"Pacifica Initiative Amending Ordinance No. 391-C.S. To Authorize a Future Rezone of the Quarry Which Could Include Residential Development, Under Certain Conditions\", be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5966, "no_votes": 13194, "total_votes": 19160, "percent_yes": 31.13778705636743, "percent_no": 68.86221294363257, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.434553", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.790165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative which amends Ordinance Number 391-C.S. to authorize up to 206 multi-family units of residential development at the Rockaway Quarry only under certain conditions specified in the Initiative measure entitled \"Pacifica Initiative Amending Ordinance No. 391-C.S. To Authorize a Future Rezone of the Quarry Which Could Include Residential Development, Under Certain Conditions\", be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4825, "fingerprint": "2016|201600115|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600115|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "88a58e72d2717767", "measure_id": "201600115", "measure_letter": "B2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to have uniformity with local cities\u2019 hotel tax rates of 12% (Buellton, Carpinteria, Goleta, Solvang, and Santa Barbara) and for general county purposes such as law enforcement, parks, recreation, facility and road maintenance, and others, shall an ordinance amending Santa Barbara County Code Section 32-12 increasing the transient occupancy tax rate (paid by persons renting accommodations for 30 days or less) in the unincorporated areas of the County from 10% to 12% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82498, "no_votes": 78215, "total_votes": 160713, "percent_yes": 51.33249954888528, "percent_no": 48.66750045111472, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.438552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.792737", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to have uniformity with local cities\u2019 hotel tax rates of 12% (Buellton, Carpinteria, Goleta, Solvang, and Santa Barbara) and for general county purposes such as law enforcement, parks, recreation, facility and road maintenance, and others, shall an ordinance amending Santa Barbara County Code Section 32-12 increasing the transient occupancy tax rate (paid by persons renting accommodations for 30 days or less) in the unincorporated areas of the County from 10% to 12% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4828, "fingerprint": "2016|201600458|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600458|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "cda7222ce65188eb", "measure_id": "201600458", "measure_letter": "C2016-1", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city councilmembers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8937, "no_votes": 4040, "total_votes": 12977, "percent_yes": 68.86799722586115, "percent_no": 31.132002774138854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.439352", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.793294", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city councilmembers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11299, "fingerprint": "2016|201600459|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600459|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "51bc78433c3b3a90", "measure_id": "201600459", "measure_letter": "C2016-2", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7344, "no_votes": 4985, "total_votes": 12329, "percent_yes": 59.566874847919536, "percent_no": 40.433125152080464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.805040", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.439620", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.793476", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11300, "fingerprint": "2016|201600460|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600460|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "201600460", "measure_letter": "C2016-3", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7627, "no_votes": 4650, "total_votes": 12277, "percent_yes": 62.12429746680785, "percent_no": 37.87570253319215, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.805229", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.439891", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.793657", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4827, "fingerprint": "2016|201600457|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600457|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "3b55837771af0b8d", "measure_id": "201600457", "measure_letter": "D2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance entitled the \"Santa Barbara Marijuana Control Act\" which taxes marijuana businesses to help fund general city services, including crime prevention, police services, and zoning enforcement under state and local marijuana laws, at a rate of 20% of gross receipts for medical marijuana and non- medical marijuana and generating estimated revenues of between $1,100,000 and $2,200,000 annually, with no terminate date, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29956, "no_votes": 12332, "total_votes": 42288, "percent_yes": 70.83806280741581, "percent_no": 29.16193719258419, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.439086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.793111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance entitled the \"Santa Barbara Marijuana Control Act\" which taxes marijuana businesses to help fund general city services, including crime prevention, police services, and zoning enforcement under state and local marijuana laws, at a rate of 20% of gross receipts for medical marijuana and non- medical marijuana and generating estimated revenues of between $1,100,000 and $2,200,000 annually, with no terminate date, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4826, "fingerprint": "2016|201600116|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600116|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "8e12b7fc1334464f", "measure_id": "201600116", "measure_letter": "E2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the formation of the Isla Vista Community Services District pursuant to Government Code Section 61250 with a provisional appropriations limit of $640,000 be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5651, "no_votes": 834, "total_votes": 6485, "percent_yes": 87.13955281418659, "percent_no": 12.860447185813413, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.438821", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.792926", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the formation of the Isla Vista Community Services District pursuant to Government Code Section 61250 with a provisional appropriations limit of $640,000 be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4824, "fingerprint": "2016|201600114|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600114|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "bcc24b8ba73c24a9", "measure_id": "201600114", "measure_letter": "F2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "If the Isla Vista Community Services District is formed, shall a utility user tax to be imposed by the District on the utilities of gas, water, electricity, sewage, and/or garbage disposal services at the rate of 8% of the total cost of an individual\u2019s service charge for the utility being taxed be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4039, "no_votes": 2559, "total_votes": 6598, "percent_yes": 61.215519854501366, "percent_no": 38.784480145498634, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.438217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.792543", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If the Isla Vista Community Services District is formed, shall a utility user tax to be imposed by the District on the utilities of gas, water, electricity, sewage, and/or garbage disposal services at the rate of 8% of the total cost of an individual\u2019s service charge for the utility being taxed be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4833, "fingerprint": "2016|201600788|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600788|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "08a557f435ac9d2d", "measure_id": "201600788", "measure_letter": "G2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Orcutt/Los Alamos elementary/secondary schools, including deteriorated roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, improve student safety/security and disabled access, keep schools well-maintained, acquire, renovate, construct classrooms/facilities/ equipment and technology infrastructure to support programs in science, math, reading and arts, replace aging portables with modem classrooms, shall Orcutt Union School District issue $60 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators, and all funds benefiting local schools", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10495, "no_votes": 7676, "total_votes": 18171, "percent_yes": 57.75686533487425, "percent_no": 42.24313466512575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.441323", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.794599", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Orcutt/Los Alamos elementary/secondary schools, including deteriorated roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, improve student safety/security and disabled access, keep schools well-maintained, acquire, renovate, construct classrooms/facilities/ equipment and technology infrastructure to support programs in science, math, reading and arts, replace aging portables with modem classrooms, shall Orcutt Union School District issue $60 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators, and all funds benefiting local schools", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4836, "fingerprint": "2016|201600791|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600791|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "3ad3eacabfcb4a97", "measure_id": "201600791", "measure_letter": "H2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Orcutt/Los Alamos elementary/secondary schools, including deteriorated roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, improve student safety/security and disabled access, keep schools well-maintained, acquire, renovate, construct classrooms/facilities/ equipment and technology infrastructure to support programs in science, math, reading and arts, replace aging portables with modem classrooms, shall Orcutt Union School District issue $60 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23818, "no_votes": 17754, "total_votes": 41572, "percent_yes": 57.29337053786202, "percent_no": 42.70662946213798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.442197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.795153", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Orcutt/Los Alamos elementary/secondary schools, including deteriorated roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, improve student safety/security and disabled access, keep schools well-maintained, acquire, renovate, construct classrooms/facilities/ equipment and technology infrastructure to support programs in science, math, reading and arts, replace aging portables with modem classrooms, shall Orcutt Union School District issue $60 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4834, "fingerprint": "2016|201600789|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600789|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "4d8be058e144e62b", "measure_id": "201600789", "measure_letter": "I2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade junior and high schools and prepare students for college/careers by repairing deteriorating classrooms, vocational/ career education facilities, restrooms, plumbing, leaky roofs, asbestos/lead paint, upgrading school safety, heating/air conditioning, updating technology, wiring, science labs, ensuring safe drinking water, repairing, constructing and acquiring classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall Santa Barbara Unified School District issue $135,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, all funds for District schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59818, "no_votes": 26678, "total_votes": 86496, "percent_yes": 69.15695523492415, "percent_no": 30.843044765075845, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.441591", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.794785", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade junior and high schools and prepare students for college/careers by repairing deteriorating classrooms, vocational/ career education facilities, restrooms, plumbing, leaky roofs, asbestos/lead paint, upgrading school safety, heating/air conditioning, updating technology, wiring, science labs, ensuring safe drinking water, repairing, constructing and acquiring classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, shall Santa Barbara Unified School District issue $135,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, all funds for District schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4835, "fingerprint": "2016|201600790|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600790|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "15c0216e8776e335", "measure_id": "201600790", "measure_letter": "J2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade local Santa Barbara elementary schools and support students by repairing/replacing deteriorating classrooms, libraries, restrooms, plumbing, leaky roofs, portables, removing asbestos/ lead paint, ensuring safe drinking water, updating classroom technology/ science labs, acquiring, constructing classrooms/facilities/equipment, shall Santa Barbara Unified School District issue $58,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits/citizen oversight, all funds for local Santa Barbara elementary schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26553, "no_votes": 10665, "total_votes": 37218, "percent_yes": 71.34451072061906, "percent_no": 28.655489279380944, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.441928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.794968", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade local Santa Barbara elementary schools and support students by repairing/replacing deteriorating classrooms, libraries, restrooms, plumbing, leaky roofs, portables, removing asbestos/ lead paint, ensuring safe drinking water, updating classroom technology/ science labs, acquiring, constructing classrooms/facilities/equipment, shall Santa Barbara Unified School District issue $58,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits/citizen oversight, all funds for local Santa Barbara elementary schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4837, "fingerprint": "2016|201600792|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600792|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "894a0c05ae086eaf", "measure_id": "201600792", "measure_letter": "K2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reconstruct critical i nfrastructure beyond its useful life including replacing corroded underground pipes, outdated roofs, and heating and air conditioning systems; upgrading fire alarm and emergency communication systems; and renovating aging restrooms and school facilities; shall Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District be authorized to issue $14,700,000 of bonds, with local citizen oversight and audits, rates below legal limits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent on District projects and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6285, "no_votes": 4688, "total_votes": 10973, "percent_yes": 57.27695251982138, "percent_no": 42.72304748017862, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.442522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.795338", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reconstruct critical i nfrastructure beyond its useful life including replacing corroded underground pipes, outdated roofs, and heating and air conditioning systems; upgrading fire alarm and emergency communication systems; and renovating aging restrooms and school facilities; shall Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District be authorized to issue $14,700,000 of bonds, with local citizen oversight and audits, rates below legal limits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent on District projects and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4832, "fingerprint": "2016|201600787|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600787|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "7b3d3ca1b2897e5b", "measure_id": "201600787", "measure_letter": "L2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall the Lompoc Unified School District issue $65,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10723, "no_votes": 7598, "total_votes": 18321, "percent_yes": 58.528464603460506, "percent_no": 41.471535396539494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.441055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.794404", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall the Lompoc Unified School District issue $65,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4830, "fingerprint": "2016|201600785|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600785|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "55256eec14d9f25d", "measure_id": "201600785", "measure_letter": "M2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; construct a new gymnasium for school and community use; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements, shall Guadalupe Elementary School District issue $5.8 million of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1316, "no_votes": 318, "total_votes": 1634, "percent_yes": 80.53855569155446, "percent_no": 19.461444308445536, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.440452", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.794030", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; construct a new gymnasium for school and community use; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements, shall Guadalupe Elementary School District issue $5.8 million of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4831, "fingerprint": "2016|201600786|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600786|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "a5dff3e525362ee5", "measure_id": "201600786", "measure_letter": "N2016", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; construct new classrooms to reduce student overcrowding and replace temporary portable classrooms; and improve student access to computers and modern technology, shall Guadalupe Elementary School District issue $5.65 million of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1294, "no_votes": 345, "total_votes": 1639, "percent_yes": 78.95057962172056, "percent_no": 21.049420378279436, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.440785", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.794219", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; construct new classrooms to reduce student overcrowding and replace temporary portable classrooms; and improve student access to computers and modern technology, shall Guadalupe Elementary School District issue $5.65 million of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4829, "fingerprint": "2016|201600784|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600784|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d5a076139aa548a3", "measure_id": "201600784", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize 50-year old classrooms, restrooms and buildings; shall the Cuyama Joint Unified School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 171, "no_votes": 63, "total_votes": 234, "percent_yes": 73.07692307692307, "percent_no": 26.923076923076934, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.440173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.793838", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize 50-year old classrooms, restrooms and buildings; shall the Cuyama Joint Unified School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11303, "fingerprint": "2016|201600793|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600793|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "18bd01a404464fa6", "measure_id": "201600793", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide stable funding for local high schools, maintain outstanding core academic programs and high quality science, math, technology and engineering courses, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and provide programs that help students prepare for college and careers, shall Los Gatos-Saratoga Union High School District renew its expiring education parcel tax at $49 per year for\r\neight years, with citizen oversight, and exemption for seniors, no funds for administrator\u2019s salaries, and every dollar benefiting local high schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8379, "no_votes": 3413, "total_votes": 11792, "percent_yes": 71.05664857530529, "percent_no": 28.94335142469471, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.811972", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.453017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.800440", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide stable funding for local high schools, maintain outstanding core academic programs and high quality science, math, technology and engineering courses, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and provide programs that help students prepare for college and careers, shall Los Gatos-Saratoga Union High School District renew its expiring education parcel tax at $49 per year for\r\neight years, with citizen oversight, and exemption for seniors, no funds for administrator\u2019s salaries, and every dollar benefiting local high schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11301, "fingerprint": "2016|201600119|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600119|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b51ab72d4e28c4f3", "measure_id": "201600119", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide affordable local housing for vulnerable populations including veterans, seniors, the disabled, low and moderate income individuals or families, foster youth, victims of abuse, the homeless and individuals suffering from mental health or substance abuse illnesses, which housing may include supportive mental health and substance abuse services, shall the County of Santa Clara issue up to $950 million in general obligation bonds to acquire or improve real property subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 454284, "no_votes": 214968, "total_votes": 669252, "percent_yes": 67.87936382707859, "percent_no": 32.12063617292141, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.807460", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.443420", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.795901", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide affordable local housing for vulnerable populations including veterans, seniors, the disabled, low and moderate income individuals or families, foster youth, victims of abuse, the homeless and individuals suffering from mental health or substance abuse illnesses, which housing may include supportive mental health and substance abuse services, shall the County of Santa Clara issue up to $950 million in general obligation bonds to acquire or improve real property subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4839, "fingerprint": "2016|201600118|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600118|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4091f129688b8d46", "measure_id": "201600118", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To continue protecting and preserving local parks; improving access to natural areas, open space, trails and recreational opportunities; keeping restrooms and facilities clean and safe; and maintaining, operating, acquiring and improving local parks, shall the Santa Clara County Park Charter Fund, established in 1972, be extended by an annual general fund transfer estimated to equal 1.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation of all property for 15 years, without increasing taxes and all funds benefitting Santa Clara County parks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 310794, "no_votes": 87240, "total_votes": 398034, "percent_yes": 78.08227437857067, "percent_no": 21.917725621429327, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.443070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.795719", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue protecting and preserving local parks; improving access to natural areas, open space, trails and recreational opportunities; keeping restrooms and facilities clean and safe; and maintaining, operating, acquiring and improving local parks, shall the Santa Clara County Park Charter Fund, established in 1972, be extended by an annual general fund transfer estimated to equal 1.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation of all property for 15 years, without increasing taxes and all funds benefitting Santa Clara County parks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11309, "fingerprint": "2016|201600804|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600804|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "109675ea5411f858", "measure_id": "201600804", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local highs schools to better prepare students for 21st century careers, by modernizing classrooms, labs, and technology for career education in engineering, science, advanced math, coding and computer skills; repairing aging facilities, including leaky roofs, floors, electrical systems, and restrooms; making seismic upgrades, removing hazardous asbestos, and adding classrooms/school facilities to prevent overcrowding, shall the Campbell Union High School District issue $275 million in bonds, within legal rates, with annual financial audits and independent citizen\u2019s oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57230, "no_votes": 28090, "total_votes": 85320, "percent_yes": 67.07688701359588, "percent_no": 32.92311298640412, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.814031", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.456821", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.802551", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local highs schools to better prepare students for 21st century careers, by modernizing classrooms, labs, and technology for career education in engineering, science, advanced math, coding and computer skills; repairing aging facilities, including leaky roofs, floors, electrical systems, and restrooms; making seismic upgrades, removing hazardous asbestos, and adding classrooms/school facilities to prevent overcrowding, shall the Campbell Union High School District issue $275 million in bonds, within legal rates, with annual financial audits and independent citizen\u2019s oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4838, "fingerprint": "2016|201600117|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600117|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c9ac6c8127701fb7", "measure_id": "201600117", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 279259, "no_votes": 119254, "total_votes": 398513, "percent_yes": 70.0752547595687, "percent_no": 29.924745240431307, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.442791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.795534", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4840, "fingerprint": "2016|201600461|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600461|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "2529d7206ebfbb53", "measure_id": "201600461", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund essential City services such as: improving police response to reduce violent crimes and burglaries; improving 911/emergency medical/fire response times; repairing potholes and streets; expanding gang prevention; and maintaining the City\u2019s long-term financial stability, shall the City of San Jose enact a \u00bc percent sales tax for 15 years, providing about $40 million annually, requiring Independent Citizens Oversight with public review of spending, and all revenues controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121030, "no_votes": 76054, "total_votes": 197084, "percent_yes": 61.41036309390919, "percent_no": 38.58963690609081, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.443700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.796084", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund essential City services such as: improving police response to reduce violent crimes and burglaries; improving 911/emergency medical/fire response times; repairing potholes and streets; expanding gang prevention; and maintaining the City\u2019s long-term financial stability, shall the City of San Jose enact a \u00bc percent sales tax for 15 years, providing about $40 million annually, requiring Independent Citizens Oversight with public review of spending, and all revenues controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4866, "fingerprint": "2016|201600803|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600803|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "af21abd12134b660", "measure_id": "201600803", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renew the Sunnyvale School District parcel tax to support classroom programs including math, English, science and technology; to attract and retain quality teachers and keep class size small; shall Sunnyvale School District be authorized to renew its existing $59 per parcel tax providing $1 million annually for seven years beginning July 1, 2018, with exemptions for senior citizens and all expenditures audited and reviewed by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee with no funds spent on administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19118, "no_votes": 6577, "total_votes": 25695, "percent_yes": 74.40358046312512, "percent_no": 25.596419536874876, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.456530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.802361", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew the Sunnyvale School District parcel tax to support classroom programs including math, English, science and technology; to attract and retain quality teachers and keep class size small; shall Sunnyvale School District be authorized to renew its existing $59 per parcel tax providing $1 million annually for seven years beginning July 1, 2018, with exemptions for senior citizens and all expenditures audited and reviewed by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee with no funds spent on administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11302, "fingerprint": "2016|201600472|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600472|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d8840dc6d119eb54", "measure_id": "201600472", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted amending Cupertino\u2019s General Plan to limit redevelopment of the Vallco Shopping District, limit building heights along major mixed-use corridors, increase to 45 feet the maximum building height in the Neighborhoods, limit lot coverages for large projects, establish new setbacks and building planes on major thoroughfares, and require voter approval for any changes to these provisions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9089, "no_votes": 14147, "total_votes": 23236, "percent_yes": 39.11602685488036, "percent_no": 60.88397314511964, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.809705", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.447494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.798205", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted amending Cupertino\u2019s General Plan to limit redevelopment of the Vallco Shopping District, limit building heights along major mixed-use corridors, increase to 45 feet the maximum building height in the Neighborhoods, limit lot coverages for large projects, establish new setbacks and building planes on major thoroughfares, and require voter approval for any changes to these provisions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4841, "fingerprint": "2016|201600462|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600462|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cd364c10af6e15b8", "measure_id": "201600462", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the San Jose Municipal Code to include Medical Marijuana Collectives as an allowed land use in agricultural, commercial pedestrian, commercial neighborhood, industrial park, light industrial, heavy industrial zoning districts, and certain planned development zoning districts, and to establish a registration process and zoning code verification\r\ncertificate process?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68438, "no_votes": 124687, "total_votes": 193125, "percent_yes": 35.437152103559875, "percent_no": 64.56284789644013, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.443970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.796276", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the San Jose Municipal Code to include Medical Marijuana Collectives as an allowed land use in agricultural, commercial pedestrian, commercial neighborhood, industrial park, light industrial, heavy industrial zoning districts, and certain planned development zoning districts, and to establish a registration process and zoning code verification\r\ncertificate process?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4867, "fingerprint": "2016|201600805|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600805|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "236cf37547a89397", "measure_id": "201600805", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue providing high-quality education and to ensure equal access to a 21st-century education for all local students by repairing leaky roofs; upgrading fire alarms and security systems; upgrading science equipment and laboratories; providing access for students and teachers with disabilities; constructing new classrooms and facilities and modernizing old classrooms, shall Campbell Union Elementary School District issue $72 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight and financial audits with no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24205, "no_votes": 11062, "total_votes": 35267, "percent_yes": 68.63356679048402, "percent_no": 31.366433209515975, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.457108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.802743", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue providing high-quality education and to ensure equal access to a 21st-century education for all local students by repairing leaky roofs; upgrading fire alarms and security systems; upgrading science equipment and laboratories; providing access for students and teachers with disabilities; constructing new classrooms and facilities and modernizing old classrooms, shall Campbell Union Elementary School District issue $72 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight and financial audits with no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4851, "fingerprint": "2016|201600473|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600473|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8df716ccba2cf8b2", "measure_id": "201600473", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative be adopted enacting the Vallco Town Center Specific Plan for the 58-acre Vallco Shopping District Special Area requiring residential (approximately 389-800 units, including approximately 20% senior housing), office (2,000,000 sf), commercial (640,000 sf), hotel, park, civic/educational uses; requiring funding/community benefits for transportation (approximately $30,000,000), schools (approximately $40,000,000), green roof (approximately 30 acres), recycled water; granting initial entitlements; establishing development standards and limited future approval process; and making related Cupertino General Plan and Municipal Code amendments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10536, "no_votes": 12790, "total_votes": 23326, "percent_yes": 45.168481522764296, "percent_no": 54.831518477235704, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.447931", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.798400", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative be adopted enacting the Vallco Town Center Specific Plan for the 58-acre Vallco Shopping District Special Area requiring residential (approximately 389-800 units, including approximately 20% senior housing), office (2,000,000 sf), commercial (640,000 sf), hotel, park, civic/educational uses; requiring funding/community benefits for transportation (approximately $30,000,000), schools (approximately $40,000,000), green roof (approximately 30 acres), recycled water; granting initial entitlements; establishing development standards and limited future approval process; and making related Cupertino General Plan and Municipal Code amendments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11308, "fingerprint": "2016|201600798|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600798|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4b51c8cef8bec9ab", "measure_id": "201600798", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local school facilities; renovate or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; renovate plumbing and sewer systems; make health, safety and security improvements; upgrade science labs and classrooms throughout the District; and construct a new elementary school, shall Gilroy Unified School District issue $170,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money used for administrator salaries and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7748, "no_votes": 4982, "total_votes": 12730, "percent_yes": 60.864100549882174, "percent_no": 39.135899450117826, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.812909", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.455030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.801402", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local school facilities; renovate or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; renovate plumbing and sewer systems; make health, safety and security improvements; upgrade science labs and classrooms throughout the District; and construct a new elementary school, shall Gilroy Unified School District issue $170,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money used for administrator salaries and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4859, "fingerprint": "2016|201600481|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600481|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5e66cb4846b0830e", "measure_id": "201600481", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the San Jose Municipal Code to require employers of 36 or more employees to offer additional work hours to existing qualified part-time employees before hiring new employees or contractors, unless waived through a collective bargaining agreement or a welfare to work program; and, authorize the City to enforce, and grant hardship exemptions from, the offer of work requirement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 202634, "no_votes": 114263, "total_votes": 316897, "percent_yes": 63.94317396504226, "percent_no": 36.05682603495774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.451642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.799885", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the San Jose Municipal Code to require employers of 36 or more employees to offer additional work hours to existing qualified part-time employees before hiring new employees or contractors, unless waived through a collective bargaining agreement or a welfare to work program; and, authorize the City to enforce, and grant hardship exemptions from, the offer of work requirement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4864, "fingerprint": "2016|201600801|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600801|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "aa9b0186135105fc", "measure_id": "201600801", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education and student achievement in neighborhood schools by maintaining small class sizes; hiring, retaining and training quality teachers; expanding science, technology, engineering, math, language, art, and music education; improving health, safety, security, and maintenance services; and providing before-/after-school programs; shall Oak Grove Elementary School District levy a parcel tax of $132 per parcel for nine years providing $3.1 million annually, exempting seniors, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24664, "no_votes": 12732, "total_votes": 37396, "percent_yes": 65.95357792277248, "percent_no": 34.04642207722752, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.455883", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.801974", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education and student achievement in neighborhood schools by maintaining small class sizes; hiring, retaining and training quality teachers; expanding science, technology, engineering, math, language, art, and music education; improving health, safety, security, and maintenance services; and providing before-/after-school programs; shall Oak Grove Elementary School District levy a parcel tax of $132 per parcel for nine years providing $3.1 million annually, exempting seniors, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4846, "fingerprint": "2016|201600467|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600467|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4be8cc55facc0313", "measure_id": "201600467", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to adopt an agreement between the City and police officers, firefighters and City employee bargaining groups that would, among other things, stop funding retiree healthcare for new employees, potentially reduce costs of supplemental pension payments, reinstate disability retirement provisions for injured police officers, firefighters and other City employees, change criteria for determining actuarial soundness, and continue to require voter approval for benefit increases?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 188943, "no_votes": 120104, "total_votes": 309047, "percent_yes": 61.13730274035988, "percent_no": 38.86269725964012, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.445377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.797287", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to adopt an agreement between the City and police officers, firefighters and City employee bargaining groups that would, among other things, stop funding retiree healthcare for new employees, potentially reduce costs of supplemental pension payments, reinstate disability retirement provisions for injured police officers, firefighters and other City employees, change criteria for determining actuarial soundness, and continue to require voter approval for benefit increases?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11305, "fingerprint": "2016|201600795|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600795|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "7cfd50a632b1081e", "measure_id": "201600795", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education at our neighborhood elementary and middle schools by attracting and retaining quality teachers, strengthening strong reading, math and science, maintaining music and art programs, keeping school libraries open, class sizes small and campuses clean and safe, shall Moreland School District renew its expiring school parcel tax at $142 per year for eight years, with an exemption for seniors, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries, and every dollar benefiting Moreland schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8182, "no_votes": 2922, "total_votes": 11104, "percent_yes": 73.68515850144092, "percent_no": 26.314841498559076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.812349", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.454107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.800826", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education at our neighborhood elementary and middle schools by attracting and retaining quality teachers, strengthening strong reading, math and science, maintaining music and art programs, keeping school libraries open, class sizes small and campuses clean and safe, shall Moreland School District renew its expiring school parcel tax at $142 per year for eight years, with an exemption for seniors, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries, and every dollar benefiting Moreland schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4843, "fingerprint": "2016|201600464|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600464|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f12c2ee9e0ef5950", "measure_id": "201600464", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted modernizing San Jose\u2019s 1986 business tax to fund essential services \u2013 such as police, emergency response, and pothole repair \u2013 with approximately $12 million in additional annual revenue by raising the base tax from $150 to $195; increasing rates incrementally for larger businesses, as provided in the ordinance at http://sanjoseca.gov/businesstax2016; adjusting for inflation; expanding exemptions for small businesses and financial hardship; and allowing online registration and payment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 204153, "no_votes": 107125, "total_votes": 311278, "percent_yes": 65.58542524688542, "percent_no": 34.41457475311458, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.444510", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.796723", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted modernizing San Jose\u2019s 1986 business tax to fund essential services \u2013 such as police, emergency response, and pothole repair \u2013 with approximately $12 million in additional annual revenue by raising the base tax from $150 to $195; increasing rates incrementally for larger businesses, as provided in the ordinance at http://sanjoseca.gov/businesstax2016; adjusting for inflation; expanding exemptions for small businesses and financial hardship; and allowing online registration and payment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4863, "fingerprint": "2016|201600800|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600800|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "677abf47566102f1", "measure_id": "201600800", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue excellent education for all local public elementary and junior high school students; maintain outstanding core academics, innovative science, technology, engineering and math programs; and attract and retain highly qualified teachers; shall Los Altos School District renew its expiring annual education parcel tax at $223 per parcel for eight years, providing approximately $2.8 million annually for local schools, with independent oversight, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, exemptions for seniors, and all funds benefitting local public schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15122, "no_votes": 6195, "total_votes": 21317, "percent_yes": 70.93868743256556, "percent_no": 29.06131256743444, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.455601", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.801780", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue excellent education for all local public elementary and junior high school students; maintain outstanding core academics, innovative science, technology, engineering and math programs; and attract and retain highly qualified teachers; shall Los Altos School District renew its expiring annual education parcel tax at $223 per parcel for eight years, providing approximately $2.8 million annually for local schools, with independent oversight, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, exemptions for seniors, and all funds benefitting local public schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11307, "fingerprint": "2016|201600797|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600797|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "fb5ccc9fa915986c", "measure_id": "201600797", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/renovate classrooms/school facilities and improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Franklin-McKinley School District construct classrooms, improve student access to modern technology, replace leaky roofs, old portable classrooms, outdated electrical/plumbing systems, improve safety/access for students with disabilities, acquire, construct, repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment by issuing $67,400,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10443, "no_votes": 2914, "total_votes": 13357, "percent_yes": 78.18372389009508, "percent_no": 21.81627610990492, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.812721", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.454750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.801208", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/renovate classrooms/school facilities and improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Franklin-McKinley School District construct classrooms, improve student access to modern technology, replace leaky roofs, old portable classrooms, outdated electrical/plumbing systems, improve safety/access for students with disabilities, acquire, construct, repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment by issuing $67,400,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4852, "fingerprint": "2016|201600474|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600474|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5217a86436dc65e7", "measure_id": "201600474", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Gilroy General Plan to add an Urban Growth Boundary line (UGB) to the General Plan Land Use Plan Map, designate lands outside the UGB as Open Space and prohibit urban development on such lands, and provide that (with limited exceptions) such restrictions may not be amended or repealed until December 31, 2040 without a vote of the people?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11972, "no_votes": 6082, "total_votes": 18054, "percent_yes": 66.31217458734906, "percent_no": 33.68782541265094, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.448446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.798584", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Gilroy General Plan to add an Urban Growth Boundary line (UGB) to the General Plan Land Use Plan Map, designate lands outside the UGB as Open Space and prohibit urban development on such lands, and provide that (with limited exceptions) such restrictions may not be amended or repealed until December 31, 2040 without a vote of the people?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4862, "fingerprint": "2016|201600799|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600799|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9367ff061160018f", "measure_id": "201600799", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and enhance student achievement, by expanding counseling and tutoring programs for at-risk students; maintaining small class sizes in kindergarten through third grade; enhancing reading, science/math programs; retaining teachers; expanding student access to after school programs, shall Franklin-McKinley School District renew without increasing its expiring parcel tax at $72 annually for 9 years, with citizen oversight, audits and an exemption for senior citizen homeowners?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18063, "no_votes": 4418, "total_votes": 22481, "percent_yes": 80.3478492949602, "percent_no": 19.6521507050398, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.455313", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.801597", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and enhance student achievement, by expanding counseling and tutoring programs for at-risk students; maintaining small class sizes in kindergarten through third grade; enhancing reading, science/math programs; retaining teachers; expanding student access to after school programs, shall Franklin-McKinley School District renew without increasing its expiring parcel tax at $72 annually for 9 years, with citizen oversight, audits and an exemption for senior citizen homeowners?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11306, "fingerprint": "2016|201600796|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600796|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "7607da785826ae46", "measure_id": "201600796", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local neighborhood schools, fix leaky, deteriorated roofs, improve fire safety, repair/upgrade classrooms, improve student safety and security, renovate outdated restrooms, upgrade heating/ventilation/electrical systems for energy efficiency, and computer technology, shall $139,999,671.60 of Alum Rock Union Elementary School District bonds approved by the voters in June 2008, be reapproved at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, with independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and all money controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12461, "no_votes": 3363, "total_votes": 15824, "percent_yes": 78.7474721941355, "percent_no": 21.252527805864503, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.812534", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.454424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.801018", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local neighborhood schools, fix leaky, deteriorated roofs, improve fire safety, repair/upgrade classrooms, improve student safety and security, renovate outdated restrooms, upgrade heating/ventilation/electrical systems for energy efficiency, and computer technology, shall $139,999,671.60 of Alum Rock Union Elementary School District bonds approved by the voters in June 2008, be reapproved at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment, with independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and all money controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4853, "fingerprint": "2016|201600475|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600475|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "2314110e36636189", "measure_id": "201600475", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance that amends the Milpitas General Plan Land Use Element to extend until December 31, 2038 an Urban Growth Boundary near the base of the Milpitas foothills, that would limit development within Milpitas to the valley floor and the base of the foothills by prohibiting Milpitas from providing city services to new land use developments in the hillside area, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14811, "no_votes": 5542, "total_votes": 20353, "percent_yes": 72.77059892890483, "percent_no": 27.229401071095168, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.448868", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.798765", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance that amends the Milpitas General Plan Land Use Element to extend until December 31, 2038 an Urban Growth Boundary near the base of the Milpitas foothills, that would limit development within Milpitas to the valley floor and the base of the foothills by prohibiting Milpitas from providing city services to new land use developments in the hillside area, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11304, "fingerprint": "2016|201600794|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600794|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8dee3eb3be3c3c74", "measure_id": "201600794", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve quality education for all students in Lakeside Joint School District, maintain specialized training for teachers, provide comprehensive science programs, update classroom technology, and protect quality academic programs for elementary and middle school students, shall the Lakeside Joint School District be authorized to implement an annual education parcel tax of $820 for ten years, with citizens\u2019 oversight, exemptions available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, every dollar spent on students and cannot be taken away by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 198, "no_votes": 104, "total_votes": 302, "percent_yes": 65.56291390728477, "percent_no": 34.437086092715234, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.812163", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.453456", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.800635", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve quality education for all students in Lakeside Joint School District, maintain specialized training for teachers, provide comprehensive science programs, update classroom technology, and protect quality academic programs for elementary and middle school students, shall the Lakeside Joint School District be authorized to implement an annual education parcel tax of $820 for ten years, with citizens\u2019 oversight, exemptions available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, every dollar spent on students and cannot be taken away by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4854, "fingerprint": "2016|201600476|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600476|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5417d4b292768bca", "measure_id": "201600476", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance, requiring until December 31, 2038, any amendments to the existing \u201cHillside Combining District\u201d Ordinance and any amendments to the general plan land use designation for lands currently designated as \u201cHillside\u201d property be approved by the voters before becoming effective, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15829, "no_votes": 4207, "total_votes": 20036, "percent_yes": 79.0027949690557, "percent_no": 20.9972050309443, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.449312", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.798945", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance, requiring until December 31, 2038, any amendments to the existing \u201cHillside Combining District\u201d Ordinance and any amendments to the general plan land use designation for lands currently designated as \u201cHillside\u201d property be approved by the voters before becoming effective, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4855, "fingerprint": "2016|201600477|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600477|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ddec0e31bc10a746", "measure_id": "201600477", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the City of Milpitas General Plan be adopted to mandate that any attempt to rezone parks, parklands or open space to residential, commercial or industrial, or any proposal for residential, commercial or industrial development in parks, parkland or open space, must be placed before Milpitas voters and secure two-thirds support in the City\u2019s next general election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17342, "no_votes": 3172, "total_votes": 20514, "percent_yes": 84.53738910012675, "percent_no": 15.462610899873255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.449762", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.799134", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the City of Milpitas General Plan be adopted to mandate that any attempt to rezone parks, parklands or open space to residential, commercial or industrial, or any proposal for residential, commercial or industrial development in parks, parkland or open space, must be placed before Milpitas voters and secure two-thirds support in the City\u2019s next general election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4856, "fingerprint": "2016|201600478|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600478|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "475e1a94bbbedd1d", "measure_id": "201600478", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 8532 authorizing an Exclusive Franchise Agreement with Waste Management, Inc. for Solid Waste Disposal Services, which was approved by the Milpitas City Council on March 15, 2016 but suspended by referendum petition on April 14, 2016, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11541, "no_votes": 8931, "total_votes": 20472, "percent_yes": 56.374560375146544, "percent_no": 43.625439624853456, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.450179", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.799324", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 8532 authorizing an Exclusive Franchise Agreement with Waste Management, Inc. for Solid Waste Disposal Services, which was approved by the Milpitas City Council on March 15, 2016 but suspended by referendum petition on April 14, 2016, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4860, "fingerprint": "2016|201600482|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600482|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9183c7887a605344", "measure_id": "201600482", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require the City to conduct a citywide special or general election requesting approval from a majority of voters for any sale, lease, lease extension, lease renewal, land swap, or transfer of any property, facility, or land that the City owns, leases, or uses for government administration, recreation, public park, or similar community purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22424, "no_votes": 22792, "total_votes": 45216, "percent_yes": 49.5930644019816, "percent_no": 50.4069355980184, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.452044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.800070", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require the City to conduct a citywide special or general election requesting approval from a majority of voters for any sale, lease, lease extension, lease renewal, land swap, or transfer of any property, facility, or land that the City owns, leases, or uses for government administration, recreation, public park, or similar community purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4844, "fingerprint": "2016|201600465|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600465|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5cefb7a24bcb88c7", "measure_id": "201600465", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain Sunnyvale\u2019s financial stability without increasing the existing 2% tax rate, and fund essential City services including police, fire and 911 emergency response, and pothole, street, sidewalk, and neighborhood park maintenance/repairs, shall Sunnyvale modernize its existing utility users tax to treat telecommunication taxpayers equally regardless of technology used, providing approximately $1,500,000 annually on an ongoing basis, until ended by voters, with independent audits, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34099, "no_votes": 10241, "total_votes": 44340, "percent_yes": 76.90347316193053, "percent_no": 23.096526838069465, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.444783", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.796916", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain Sunnyvale\u2019s financial stability without increasing the existing 2% tax rate, and fund essential City services including police, fire and 911 emergency response, and pothole, street, sidewalk, and neighborhood park maintenance/repairs, shall Sunnyvale modernize its existing utility users tax to treat telecommunication taxpayers equally regardless of technology used, providing approximately $1,500,000 annually on an ongoing basis, until ended by voters, with independent audits, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4847, "fingerprint": "2016|201600468|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600468|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "44aefbb180cadc1a", "measure_id": "201600468", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 702 of the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to set the salaries of the Mayor at $2500 per month and City Council at $2000 per month, and to create a Salary Setting Commission to review and adjust those salaries every two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25640, "no_votes": 10393, "total_votes": 36033, "percent_yes": 71.1569949768268, "percent_no": 28.843005023173205, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.445709", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.797475", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 702 of the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to set the salaries of the Mayor at $2500 per month and City Council at $2000 per month, and to create a Salary Setting Commission to review and adjust those salaries every two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4848, "fingerprint": "2016|201600469|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600469|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "467a1e7925ba0c8b", "measure_id": "201600469", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 701 and 704.1 of the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to limit the Mayor and members of the City Council to no more than two full terms for each office, and to define a partial term in excess of two years as a full term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29495, "no_votes": 6908, "total_votes": 36403, "percent_yes": 81.02354201576793, "percent_no": 18.97645798423207, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.446136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.797655", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 701 and 704.1 of the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to limit the Mayor and members of the City Council to no more than two full terms for each office, and to define a partial term in excess of two years as a full term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4849, "fingerprint": "2016|201600470|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600470|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "beb355463dc06e64", "measure_id": "201600470", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 703 of the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to provide that vacancies in any elective office of the City be filled by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council and to require that persons appointed to fill vacancies occurring in the first half of a term of office shall hold office until the next general municipal election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28156, "no_votes": 6855, "total_votes": 35011, "percent_yes": 80.4204392905087, "percent_no": 19.579560709491304, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.446556", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.797839", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 703 of the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to provide that vacancies in any elective office of the City be filled by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council and to require that persons appointed to fill vacancies occurring in the first half of a term of office shall hold office until the next general municipal election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4850, "fingerprint": "2016|201600471|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600471|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "47c373470cb11f8d", "measure_id": "201600471", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 714.1 of the Santa Clara City Charter be added to provide that no City owned land used for park or recreational purposes, including the Ulistac Natural Area and the Santa Clara Soccer Park, shall be sold or disposed of by the City without being authorized by a two-thirds (2/3) majority vote and that development upon such property shall be subject to referendum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33552, "no_votes": 3890, "total_votes": 37442, "percent_yes": 89.61059772448053, "percent_no": 10.389402275519473, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.446969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.798020", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 714.1 of the Santa Clara City Charter be added to provide that no City owned land used for park or recreational purposes, including the Ulistac Natural Area and the Santa Clara Soccer Park, shall be sold or disposed of by the City without being authorized by a two-thirds (2/3) majority vote and that development upon such property shall be subject to referendum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4857, "fingerprint": "2016|201600479|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600479|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "beb067923ad64255", "measure_id": "201600479", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted to amend the Morgan Hill General Plan and Municipal Code to update the City\u2019s voter-approved Residential Development Control System (RDCS) to extend it to 2035, establish a population ceiling of 58,200, with a slower rate of growth than currently exists, and improve policies to maintain neighborhood character, encourage more efficient land use, conserve water, and preserve open space?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13177, "no_votes": 4047, "total_votes": 17224, "percent_yes": 76.50371574547144, "percent_no": 23.49628425452856, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.450816", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.799511", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted to amend the Morgan Hill General Plan and Municipal Code to update the City\u2019s voter-approved Residential Development Control System (RDCS) to extend it to 2035, establish a population ceiling of 58,200, with a slower rate of growth than currently exists, and improve policies to maintain neighborhood character, encourage more efficient land use, conserve water, and preserve open space?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4842, "fingerprint": "2016|201600463|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600463|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "39ca21ea1f45612a", "measure_id": "201600463", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain quality of life and small town character in Los Gatos by enhancing traffic safety and flow; maintaining 911 response, police services, parks, trails, creeks, playground equipment and restrooms; repairing potholes and Town facilities; beautifying Downtown; providing general services, shall Los Gatos increase by 2% the short-term rental tax paid only by hotel/lodging guests, raising approximately $350,000 to $400,000 per year with published annual audits, fiscal oversight, and all funds spent locally for Los Gatos?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12698, "no_votes": 2779, "total_votes": 15477, "percent_yes": 82.04432383536862, "percent_no": 17.955676164631384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.444237", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.796459", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality of life and small town character in Los Gatos by enhancing traffic safety and flow; maintaining 911 response, police services, parks, trails, creeks, playground equipment and restrooms; repairing potholes and Town facilities; beautifying Downtown; providing general services, shall Los Gatos increase by 2% the short-term rental tax paid only by hotel/lodging guests, raising approximately $350,000 to $400,000 per year with published annual audits, fiscal oversight, and all funds spent locally for Los Gatos?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4861, "fingerprint": "2016|201600807|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600807|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4e7d2570281664fa", "measure_id": "201600807", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local high school education by upgrading science labs and classrooms to help prepare students for college and careers; continue improving school access for students with disabilities; adding classrooms and school facilities to reduce overcrowding; upgrading aging student facilities; and improving school and earthquake safety, shall the San Benito High School District issue $60 million in bonds, with citizen oversight, annual audits and with NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35, "no_votes": 20, "total_votes": 55, "percent_yes": 63.63636363636363, "percent_no": 36.36363636363637, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.452535", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.800255", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local high school education by upgrading science labs and classrooms to help prepare students for college and careers; continue improving school access for students with disabilities; adding classrooms and school facilities to reduce overcrowding; upgrading aging student facilities; and improving school and earthquake safety, shall the San Benito High School District issue $60 million in bonds, with citizen oversight, annual audits and with NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4845, "fingerprint": "2016|201600466|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600466|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "182393b5c59e36a3", "measure_id": "201600466", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a Rent Stabilization CITY CHARTER AMENDMENT be adopted enacting rent regulation and prohibiting amendments except by Citywide election, with annual rent increases limited to the Consumer Price Index (minimum 2%, maximum 5%) for most multifamily rental units built before February 1, 1995; prohibiting evictions without just cause for rental units built before this measure becomes effective; creating a Rental Housing Committee authorized to enact regulations, hire staff, expend funds, and charge landlords fees to implement this amendment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15393, "no_votes": 13341, "total_votes": 28734, "percent_yes": 53.57068281478388, "percent_no": 46.42931718521612, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.445105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.797105", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Rent Stabilization CITY CHARTER AMENDMENT be adopted enacting rent regulation and prohibiting amendments except by Citywide election, with annual rent increases limited to the Consumer Price Index (minimum 2%, maximum 5%) for most multifamily rental units built before February 1, 1995; prohibiting evictions without just cause for rental units built before this measure becomes effective; creating a Rental Housing Committee authorized to enact regulations, hire staff, expend funds, and charge landlords fees to implement this amendment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4858, "fingerprint": "2016|201600480|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600480|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "67bd3a0f2e3b9a9a", "measure_id": "201600480", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a RENT STABILIZATION ORDINANCE be adopted requiring a tenant-landlord dispute resolution program and binding arbitration for rent increase disputes exceeding 5% of base rent per 12-month period and service reductions for most multifamily rental units with a certificate of occupancy before February 1, 1995; prohibiting eviction of tenants without just cause or relocation? assistance; prohibiting substantive changes for two years, and requiring a super majority City Council vote for substantive changes thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14308, "no_votes": 13574, "total_votes": 27882, "percent_yes": 51.31626138727494, "percent_no": 48.68373861272506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.451230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.799701", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a RENT STABILIZATION ORDINANCE be adopted requiring a tenant-landlord dispute resolution program and binding arbitration for rent increase disputes exceeding 5% of base rent per 12-month period and service reductions for most multifamily rental units with a certificate of occupancy before February 1, 1995; prohibiting eviction of tenants without just cause or relocation? assistance; prohibiting substantive changes for two years, and requiring a super majority City Council vote for substantive changes thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4869, "fingerprint": "2016|201600808|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600808|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6d25f72c1c433743", "measure_id": "201600808", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/ upgrade classrooms to prepare students/ veterans for jobs/ university transfer by repairing/ building nursing, engineering, vocational, technology, science/ job training classrooms, improving campus, earthquake safety/ disabled access, remove asbestos/ lead paint, acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities/ equipment, shall San Jose-Evergreen Community College District issue $748,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/ pensions, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 175265, "no_votes": 95111, "total_votes": 270376, "percent_yes": 64.82269136313874, "percent_no": 35.177308636861255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.457669", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.803125", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/ upgrade classrooms to prepare students/ veterans for jobs/ university transfer by repairing/ building nursing, engineering, vocational, technology, science/ job training classrooms, improving campus, earthquake safety/ disabled access, remove asbestos/ lead paint, acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities/ equipment, shall San Jose-Evergreen Community College District issue $748,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/ pensions, requiring citizen oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4865, "fingerprint": "2016|201600802|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600802|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4c77660f9b118a19", "measure_id": "201600802", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education in local neighborhood schools by supporting core academic programs in reading, writing, math, the arts and science, preparing students for college and careers and attracting and retaining high performing teachers and educational staff, shall San Jose Unified School District authorize an annual $72 school parcel tax for 8 years, raising approximately $5 million annually, with independent citizen oversight, no funds for district office administrators\u2019 salaries, a senior citizen exemption and all funds benefiting local neighborhood schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64280, "no_votes": 31494, "total_votes": 95774, "percent_yes": 67.11633637521666, "percent_no": 32.88366362478334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.456163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.802167", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education in local neighborhood schools by supporting core academic programs in reading, writing, math, the arts and science, preparing students for college and careers and attracting and retaining high performing teachers and educational staff, shall San Jose Unified School District authorize an annual $72 school parcel tax for 8 years, raising approximately $5 million annually, with independent citizen oversight, no funds for district office administrators\u2019 salaries, a senior citizen exemption and all funds benefiting local neighborhood schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4868, "fingerprint": "2016|201600806|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600806|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "129591a23a1232ff", "measure_id": "201600806", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/construct science, technology and engineering classrooms; remove hazardous materials from school grounds; upgrade fire/security systems; and replace deteriorating roofs at Andrew Hill, Calero, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Yerba Buena, W.C. Overfelt, alternative, adult and district charter schools, shall East Side Union High School District issue $510 million of bonds with independent citizen oversight, interest rates below legal limits, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 114080, "no_votes": 43503, "total_votes": 157583, "percent_yes": 72.39359575588738, "percent_no": 27.606404244112625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.457390", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.802935", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/construct science, technology and engineering classrooms; remove hazardous materials from school grounds; upgrade fire/security systems; and replace deteriorating roofs at Andrew Hill, Calero, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Yerba Buena, W.C. Overfelt, alternative, adult and district charter schools, shall East Side Union High School District issue $510 million of bonds with independent citizen oversight, interest rates below legal limits, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11311, "fingerprint": "2016|201600814|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600814|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a10c57473bc96f0b", "measure_id": "201600814", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade local middle and high school classrooms, science labs, career training facilities, and technology infrastructure to support student achievement in math, science, engineering, English, social studies, visual/performing arts, technology, and skilled trades; acquire, renovate, construct/equip classrooms, sites/facilities; and improve school safety, security and disabled access; shall Santa Cruz City High School District issue $140 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds benefitting local middle and high schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45033, "no_votes": 14377, "total_votes": 59410, "percent_yes": 75.80037030802896, "percent_no": 24.19962969197104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.817584", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.462392", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.806105", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade local middle and high school classrooms, science labs, career training facilities, and technology infrastructure to support student achievement in math, science, engineering, English, social studies, visual/performing arts, technology, and skilled trades; acquire, renovate, construct/equip classrooms, sites/facilities; and improve school safety, security and disabled access; shall Santa Cruz City High School District issue $140 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds benefitting local middle and high schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4881, "fingerprint": "2016|201600809|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600809|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "deac66bb78f734ef", "measure_id": "201600809", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide stable funding for local high schools, maintain outstanding core academic programs and high quality science, math, technology and engineering courses, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and provide programs that help students prepare for college and careers, shall Los Gatos- Saratoga Union High School District renew its expiring education parcel tax at $49 per year for eight years, with citizen oversight, an exemption for seniors, no funds for administrator\u2019s salaries, and every dollar benefiting local high schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 806, "no_votes": 432, "total_votes": 1238, "percent_yes": 65.10500807754443, "percent_no": 34.894991922455574, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.461098", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.805358", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide stable funding for local high schools, maintain outstanding core academic programs and high quality science, math, technology and engineering courses, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and provide programs that help students prepare for college and careers, shall Los Gatos- Saratoga Union High School District renew its expiring education parcel tax at $49 per year for eight years, with citizen oversight, an exemption for seniors, no funds for administrator\u2019s salaries, and every dollar benefiting local high schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4883, "fingerprint": "2016|201600813|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600813|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "059bd8e121581494", "measure_id": "201600813", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade neighborhood elementary school classrooms and facilities, including deteriorated roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems; remove hazardous materials; renovate, construct/equip, acquire classrooms, facilities and technology infrastructure to support programs in reading, math, science, arts and technology; improve school safety/security; and replace outdated portables with modern classrooms; shall Santa Cruz City Elementary School District issue $68 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits and all funds dedicated locally to Santa Cruz elementary schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24522, "no_votes": 6324, "total_votes": 30846, "percent_yes": 79.49815211048434, "percent_no": 20.50184788951566, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.462039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.805924", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade neighborhood elementary school classrooms and facilities, including deteriorated roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems; remove hazardous materials; renovate, construct/equip, acquire classrooms, facilities and technology infrastructure to support programs in reading, math, science, arts and technology; improve school safety/security; and replace outdated portables with modern classrooms; shall Santa Cruz City Elementary School District issue $68 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits and all funds dedicated locally to Santa Cruz elementary schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4884, "fingerprint": "2016|201600815|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600815|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "c5b3764d0341a976", "measure_id": "201600815", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and upgrade inadequate electrical systems; shall Soquel Union Elementary School District issue $42,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10064, "no_votes": 4000, "total_votes": 14064, "percent_yes": 71.55858930602957, "percent_no": 28.441410693970425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.462734", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.806287", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and upgrade inadequate electrical systems; shall Soquel Union Elementary School District issue $42,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4871, "fingerprint": "2016|201600121|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600121|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "c48d16a1343aaeae", "measure_id": "201600121", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect the quality of life in Santa Cruz County and to fund essential County services such as police, fire, emergency response, health services, youth and senior programs, job creation, housing, environmental protection, and animal shelter/adoption, shall Measure K be amended to revise the definition of cannabis to conform to State law and revise the definition of cannabis business or medical marijuana business to include all cannabis businesses with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95016, "no_votes": 23143, "total_votes": 118159, "percent_yes": 80.41367987203684, "percent_no": 19.586320127963162, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.458286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.803534", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of life in Santa Cruz County and to fund essential County services such as police, fire, emergency response, health services, youth and senior programs, job creation, housing, environmental protection, and animal shelter/adoption, shall Measure K be amended to revise the definition of cannabis to conform to State law and revise the definition of cannabis business or medical marijuana business to include all cannabis businesses with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4872, "fingerprint": "2016|201600483|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600483|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "6087aca67dcaf53b", "measure_id": "201600483", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing taxes, shall the City of Capitola extend the 2017 sunset date of its current one-quarter percent sales tax for an additional ten years to protect essential city services and facilities, such as police and emergency safety programs, protect the wharf and beach from storms and rising sea levels and maintain and improve parks, sidewalks and bike lanes with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4081, "no_votes": 952, "total_votes": 5033, "percent_yes": 81.08484005563282, "percent_no": 18.915159944367176, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.458559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.803723", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing taxes, shall the City of Capitola extend the 2017 sunset date of its current one-quarter percent sales tax for an additional ten years to protect essential city services and facilities, such as police and emergency safety programs, protect the wharf and beach from storms and rising sea levels and maintain and improve parks, sidewalks and bike lanes with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4876, "fingerprint": "2016|201600487|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600487|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "8680d5691e0d6360", "measure_id": "201600487", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an amendment to the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz Section 604 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18423, "no_votes": 4106, "total_votes": 22529, "percent_yes": 81.77460162457277, "percent_no": 18.225398375427233, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.459680", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.804444", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an amendment to the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz Section 604 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4877, "fingerprint": "2016|201600488|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600488|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "65c020748fe661b6", "measure_id": "201600488", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an amendment to the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz Section 1429 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18077, "no_votes": 4336, "total_votes": 22413, "percent_yes": 80.65408468299647, "percent_no": 19.34591531700353, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.459942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.804622", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an amendment to the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz Section 1429 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4879, "fingerprint": "2016|201600490|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600490|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "1b5d7a98557a91fb", "measure_id": "201600490", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect the quality of life in the City of Santa Cruz and to fund essential city services such as police, fire, emergency response, youth and senior programs, job creation, housing, and environmental protection, shall Measure L be amended to clarify minor administrative procedures, revise the cannabis definition to conform to State law and revise the definition of cannabis business or medical marijuana business to include all cannabis businesses with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22637, "no_votes": 4287, "total_votes": 26924, "percent_yes": 84.0774030604665, "percent_no": 15.922596939533506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.460537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.804981", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of life in the City of Santa Cruz and to fund essential city services such as police, fire, emergency response, youth and senior programs, job creation, housing, and environmental protection, shall Measure L be amended to clarify minor administrative procedures, revise the cannabis definition to conform to State law and revise the definition of cannabis business or medical marijuana business to include all cannabis businesses with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11310, "fingerprint": "2016|201600810|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600810|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "8dee3eb3be3c3c74", "measure_id": "201600810", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve quality education for all students in Lakeside Joint School District, maintain specialized training for teachers, provide comprehensive science programs, update classroom technology, and protect quality academic programs for elementary and middle school students, shall the Lakeside Joint School District be authorized to implement an annual education parcel tax of $820 for ten years, with citizens\u2019 oversight, exemptions available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, every dollar spent on students and cannot be taken away by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 405, "no_votes": 217, "total_votes": 622, "percent_yes": 65.11254019292605, "percent_no": 34.88745980707395, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.817026", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.461384", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.805555", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve quality education for all students in Lakeside Joint School District, maintain specialized training for teachers, provide comprehensive science programs, update classroom technology, and protect quality academic programs for elementary and middle school students, shall the Lakeside Joint School District be authorized to implement an annual education parcel tax of $820 for ten years, with citizens\u2019 oversight, exemptions available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, every dollar spent on students and cannot be taken away by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4873, "fingerprint": "2016|201600484|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600484|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "326cffe871c7af87", "measure_id": "201600484", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect the quality of life in Watsonville by limiting further cuts to police, fire, emergency services, parks and recreation, economic development, job creation, and essential city services; shall the City of Watsonville be authorized to levy an additional one percent of Transient Occupancy Tax on people staying at lodging facilities in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9628, "no_votes": 3169, "total_votes": 12797, "percent_yes": 75.23638352738922, "percent_no": 24.763616472610778, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.458826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.803904", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of life in Watsonville by limiting further cuts to police, fire, emergency services, parks and recreation, economic development, job creation, and essential city services; shall the City of Watsonville be authorized to levy an additional one percent of Transient Occupancy Tax on people staying at lodging facilities in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4874, "fingerprint": "2016|201600485|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600485|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "6320c9f7be10151d", "measure_id": "201600485", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Utility Users Tax Ordinance be amended reducing the tax on telecommunications and video from 6% to 5.5%, exempt low income persons/seniors/disabled from energy taxes, adding wireless and modernizing ordinance to treat taxpayers the same regardless of technology; to generate approximately four million annually, until ended by voters or reduced by City Council to help fund essential services including: police, fire protection, youth programs, parks and recreation, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9057, "no_votes": 3429, "total_votes": 12486, "percent_yes": 72.537241710716, "percent_no": 27.462758289283997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.459146", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.804081", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Utility Users Tax Ordinance be amended reducing the tax on telecommunications and video from 6% to 5.5%, exempt low income persons/seniors/disabled from energy taxes, adding wireless and modernizing ordinance to treat taxpayers the same regardless of technology; to generate approximately four million annually, until ended by voters or reduced by City Council to help fund essential services including: police, fire protection, youth programs, parks and recreation, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4875, "fingerprint": "2016|201600486|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600486|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "512c187ffa54e570", "measure_id": "201600486", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect and preserve the quality of life in the City of Watsonville and to fund essential City services, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax on cannabis cultivation of not more than $20 per square foot per year of canopy area, not more than 2.5% on gross receipts from manufactured cannabis product, and not more than 10% on gross receipts from the retail sale of cannabis?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9136, "no_votes": 3176, "total_votes": 12312, "percent_yes": 74.2040285899935, "percent_no": 25.7959714100065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.459415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.804263", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect and preserve the quality of life in the City of Watsonville and to fund essential City services, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax on cannabis cultivation of not more than $20 per square foot per year of canopy area, not more than 2.5% on gross receipts from manufactured cannabis product, and not more than 10% on gross receipts from the retail sale of cannabis?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4878, "fingerprint": "2016|201600489|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600489|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "7e43d9fb5a5b4824", "measure_id": "201600489", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure L is approved by the voters, shall (i) 20% of its proceeds be used only to pay for law enforcement and crime prevention services, (ii) 15% used only to pay for fire services, (iii) 20% used only to pay for community development, (iv) 25% used only to pay for parks and community services, (v) 8% used only for the City libraries, and (vi) 12% only for non-profit social and community services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8949, "no_votes": 3113, "total_votes": 12062, "percent_yes": 74.1916763389156, "percent_no": 25.8083236610844, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.460203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.804800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure L is approved by the voters, shall (i) 20% of its proceeds be used only to pay for law enforcement and crime prevention services, (ii) 15% used only to pay for fire services, (iii) 20% used only to pay for community development, (iv) 25% used only to pay for parks and community services, (v) 8% used only for the City libraries, and (vi) 12% only for non-profit social and community services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4870, "fingerprint": "2016|201600120|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600120|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "91fbc196387f05fe", "measure_id": "201600120", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect the quality of education in local elementary schools, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, continue science programs, arts and music instruction, maintain smaller class sizes, provide library services and prevent existing school funding from expiring, shall Santa Cruz City Elementary School District renew its $105 parcel tax for a period of 8 years without raising the tax rate, including an exemption for senior citizens, independent citizen oversight, and all funds staying local to benefit Santa Cruz elementary schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8499, "no_votes": 2596, "total_votes": 11095, "percent_yes": 76.6020730058585, "percent_no": 23.3979269941415, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-17", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-28 14:30:29.890044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084882", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4880, "fingerprint": "2016|201600812|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600812|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "607d58ecd8c86a83", "measure_id": "201600812", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by upgrading aging classrooms, technology/science labs, repairing outdated, deteriorating wiring, sewer lines, improving campus safety, handicapped accessibility, increasing water conservation/energy efficiency, and acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no funding administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, requiring independent audits, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46930, "no_votes": 40681, "total_votes": 87611, "percent_yes": 53.56633299471527, "percent_no": 46.43366700528473, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.460824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.805167", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade classrooms to better prepare students, veterans, workers for good jobs/university transfer by upgrading aging classrooms, technology/science labs, repairing outdated, deteriorating wiring, sewer lines, improving campus safety, handicapped accessibility, increasing water conservation/energy efficiency, and acquiring, constructing, repairing sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no funding administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, requiring independent audits, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4882, "fingerprint": "2016|201600811|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600811|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "1faca24d781596e4", "measure_id": "201600811", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education with funds that cannot be taken by the State, including science, art, music, reading, math and tutoring programs, attract and retain qualified teachers, support library services, and preserve small class sizes and after school programs to keep children safe, shall Live Oak School District renew its existing annual education parcel tax at $98, for twelve years, with exemptions for senior citizens, citizen oversight, mandatory audits and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6247, "no_votes": 1549, "total_votes": 7796, "percent_yes": 80.13083632632119, "percent_no": 19.869163673678813, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.461741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.805743", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education with funds that cannot be taken by the State, including science, art, music, reading, math and tutoring programs, attract and retain qualified teachers, support library services, and preserve small class sizes and after school programs to keep children safe, shall Live Oak School District renew its existing annual education parcel tax at $98, for twelve years, with exemptions for senior citizens, citizen oversight, mandatory audits and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4889, "fingerprint": "2016|201600817|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600817|SHASTA", "content_hash": "1407ca9fdeb6d539", "measure_id": "201600817", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade, modernize, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and technology; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; repair/replace leaky roofs and deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; shall the Junction Elementary School District issue $3,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 894, "no_votes": 532, "total_votes": 1426, "percent_yes": 62.69284712482468, "percent_no": 37.30715287517532, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.464240", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.807228", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade, modernize, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and technology; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; repair/replace leaky roofs and deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; shall the Junction Elementary School District issue $3,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4888, "fingerprint": "2016|201600816|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600816|SHASTA", "content_hash": "692f73761b7338ce", "measure_id": "201600816", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade/renovate/modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student safety and security; repair/replace leaky roofs; renovate electrical and plumbing systems; upgrade multi-purpose rooms/gyms; and repair playground surfaces; shall the Black Butte Union Elementary School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1058, "no_votes": 636, "total_votes": 1694, "percent_yes": 62.455726092089726, "percent_no": 37.544273907910274, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.463924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.807037", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade/renovate/modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student safety and security; repair/replace leaky roofs; renovate electrical and plumbing systems; upgrade multi-purpose rooms/gyms; and repair playground surfaces; shall the Black Butte Union Elementary School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4885, "fingerprint": "2016|201600491|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600491|SHASTA", "content_hash": "2afc185928c48f6e", "measure_id": "201600491", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the City of Redding to collect a one-half of one percent sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for general municipal purposes for a period of ten years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14373, "no_votes": 23947, "total_votes": 38320, "percent_yes": 37.50782881002087, "percent_no": 62.49217118997913, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.463038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.806481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the City of Redding to collect a one-half of one percent sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for general municipal purposes for a period of ten years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4886, "fingerprint": "2016|201600492|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600492|SHASTA", "content_hash": "a8c47aa1f68932da", "measure_id": "201600492", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the voters of the City of Redding approve a one- half of one percent limited term general sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) increase, should the additional revenue be used to augment police protection, jail space, mental health services, fire protection, and related public safety services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25004, "no_votes": 12656, "total_votes": 37660, "percent_yes": 66.39405204460967, "percent_no": 33.605947955390334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.463310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.806662", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the voters of the City of Redding approve a one- half of one percent limited term general sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) increase, should the additional revenue be used to augment police protection, jail space, mental health services, fire protection, and related public safety services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4890, "fingerprint": "2016|201600818|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600818|SHASTA", "content_hash": "e1c86233ec640034", "measure_id": "201600818", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Cascade Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $8.9 million in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed in the Bond Project List, and in order to qualify to receive State matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3456, "no_votes": 1886, "total_votes": 5342, "percent_yes": 64.69487083489331, "percent_no": 35.30512916510669, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.464508", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.807422", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Cascade Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $8.9 million in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed in the Bond Project List, and in order to qualify to receive State matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4887, "fingerprint": "2016|201600821|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600821|SHASTA", "content_hash": "b3885ca4893d7ece", "measure_id": "201600821", "measure_letter": "H/J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42279, "no_votes": 33666, "total_votes": 75945, "percent_yes": 55.67055105668576, "percent_no": 44.32944894331424, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.463594", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.806844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4892, "fingerprint": "2016|201600820|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600820|SHASTA", "content_hash": "021e545c232447d6", "measure_id": "201600820", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and provide equity among all District high schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State; construct, modernize, and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical and deteriorating plumbing systems; construct/upgrade science labs; and improve campus safety, shall Shasta Union High School District issue $56,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24640, "no_votes": 19859, "total_votes": 44499, "percent_yes": 55.37203083215353, "percent_no": 44.62796916784647, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.465057", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.807794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and provide equity among all District high schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State; construct, modernize, and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical and deteriorating plumbing systems; construct/upgrade science labs; and improve campus safety, shall Shasta Union High School District issue $56,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4891, "fingerprint": "2016|201600819|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600819|SHASTA", "content_hash": "088a856c8359e938", "measure_id": "201600819", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and upgrade classroom/career technology by upgrading classrooms and technology for 21st century learning; improving science labs/facilities for agriculture, nursing, and special education; repairing wiring, plumbing, and restrooms; improving disabled student access; and acquiring, constructing, and modernizing facilities and equipment, shall Red Bluff Joint Union High School District issue $26 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80, "no_votes": 52, "total_votes": 132, "percent_yes": 60.60606060606061, "percent_no": 39.39393939393939, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.464781", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.807604", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and upgrade classroom/career technology by upgrading classrooms and technology for 21st century learning; improving science labs/facilities for agriculture, nursing, and special education; repairing wiring, plumbing, and restrooms; improving disabled student access; and acquiring, constructing, and modernizing facilities and equipment, shall Red Bluff Joint Union High School District issue $26 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4893, "fingerprint": "2016|201600122|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600122|SIERRA", "content_hash": "b0e8342f5fa64ef1", "measure_id": "201600122", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the County of Sierra adopt an ordinance which would allow commercial marijuana activities within the County, including but not limited to cultivation, processing, distribution, warehousing and transportation of marijuana?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 578, "no_votes": 913, "total_votes": 1491, "percent_yes": 38.76592890677398, "percent_no": 61.23407109322602, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.465358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.807986", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the County of Sierra adopt an ordinance which would allow commercial marijuana activities within the County, including but not limited to cultivation, processing, distribution, warehousing and transportation of marijuana?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4894, "fingerprint": "2016|201600123|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600123|SIERRA", "content_hash": "9b3cf7c7a014d20a", "measure_id": "201600123", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending chapter 8.01 of the Sierra County Code banning commercial cultivation of marijuana, regulating outdoor cultivation and indoor cultivation of medical marijuana for qualified patients and primary caregivers only, limiting cultivation per parcel to 10 plants for one qualified caregiver or patient and 20 plants for two or more qualified caregivers or patients, and regulating the location and conditions under which marijuana may be grown within Sierra County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 775, "no_votes": 1053, "total_votes": 1828, "percent_yes": 42.3960612691466, "percent_no": 57.6039387308534, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.465663", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.808169", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending chapter 8.01 of the Sierra County Code banning commercial cultivation of marijuana, regulating outdoor cultivation and indoor cultivation of medical marijuana for qualified patients and primary caregivers only, limiting cultivation per parcel to 10 plants for one qualified caregiver or patient and 20 plants for two or more qualified caregivers or patients, and regulating the location and conditions under which marijuana may be grown within Sierra County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4899, "fingerprint": "2016|201600128|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600128|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "b361a54021b31ed7", "measure_id": "201600128", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Lake Shastina Community Services District increase their special tax for police services to $110 per year? This reflects an increase of $3.75 per month on each parcel and is the first increase in twenty years. This measure provides for recruiting and retaining qualified law enforcement personnel, furnish, operate and maintain vehicles and essential safety equipment, and police related services for the protection of life and property in the Lake Shastina Community Services District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 815, "no_votes": 406, "total_votes": 1221, "percent_yes": 66.74856674856674, "percent_no": 33.251433251433255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.467128", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.809081", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lake Shastina Community Services District increase their special tax for police services to $110 per year? This reflects an increase of $3.75 per month on each parcel and is the first increase in twenty years. This measure provides for recruiting and retaining qualified law enforcement personnel, furnish, operate and maintain vehicles and essential safety equipment, and police related services for the protection of life and property in the Lake Shastina Community Services District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4902, "fingerprint": "2016|201600493|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600493|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "ebf409ea98edb32a", "measure_id": "201600493", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To pay for essential City services such as: improving law enforcement response to violent crimes, burglaries and property offenses; repairing potholes and streets; and maintaining the Yreka\u2019s long-term financial stability, shall Ordinance #843 be adopted to impose a \u00bd percent transaction and use (sales) tax on an ongoing basis, providing about $950,000 annually, with audits and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1733, "no_votes": 1272, "total_votes": 3005, "percent_yes": 57.67054908485857, "percent_no": 42.32945091514143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.468036", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.809631", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To pay for essential City services such as: improving law enforcement response to violent crimes, burglaries and property offenses; repairing potholes and streets; and maintaining the Yreka\u2019s long-term financial stability, shall Ordinance #843 be adopted to impose a \u00bd percent transaction and use (sales) tax on an ongoing basis, providing about $950,000 annually, with audits and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4906, "fingerprint": "2016|201600497|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600497|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201600497", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 434, "no_votes": 243, "total_votes": 677, "percent_yes": 64.10635155096011, "percent_no": 35.89364844903989, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.469119", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.810393", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4900, "fingerprint": "2016|201600129|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600129|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "f0b4d67dec58dd87", "measure_id": "201600129", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To go toward the Siskiyou County General Fund and be used to pay for the servicing of the construction loan liability funding the construction of the new County jail, shall the County of Siskiyou enact a quarter-percent (0.25%) sales tax for the term of the construction loan for the benefit of the County General Fund and constructing the new County jail?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8081, "no_votes": 12124, "total_votes": 20205, "percent_yes": 39.99505073001732, "percent_no": 60.00494926998268, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.467393", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.809265", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To go toward the Siskiyou County General Fund and be used to pay for the servicing of the construction loan liability funding the construction of the new County jail, shall the County of Siskiyou enact a quarter-percent (0.25%) sales tax for the term of the construction loan for the benefit of the County General Fund and constructing the new County jail?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4901, "fingerprint": "2016|201600130|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600130|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "eb461d800dd6ba3b", "measure_id": "201600130", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the County of Siskiyou amend Articles 1 through 3 of Chapter 13 of Title 3 of the Siskiyou County Code to extend the requirement to obtain a groundwater extraction permit to all other groundwater sources in the County not currently defined as a groundwater basin when groundwater is extracted for use outside the County, and to remove the permitting exemption for commercial water bottling enterprises?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8828, "no_votes": 11002, "total_votes": 19830, "percent_yes": 44.51840645486636, "percent_no": 55.48159354513364, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.467700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.809450", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the County of Siskiyou amend Articles 1 through 3 of Chapter 13 of Title 3 of the Siskiyou County Code to extend the requirement to obtain a groundwater extraction permit to all other groundwater sources in the County not currently defined as a groundwater basin when groundwater is extracted for use outside the County, and to remove the permitting exemption for commercial water bottling enterprises?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4895, "fingerprint": "2016|201600124|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600124|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "ca0669318463de61", "measure_id": "201600124", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide a method to finance increased emergency medical services shall an annual special tax be levied of $5.00 per Legal Secured Parcel, excluding agricultural secured parcels not improved with a residential dwelling unit located in County Service Area No. 6, commencing Fiscal Year 2017/2018?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4355, "no_votes": 4885, "total_votes": 9240, "percent_yes": 47.13203463203463, "percent_no": 52.86796536796537, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.465931", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.808356", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a method to finance increased emergency medical services shall an annual special tax be levied of $5.00 per Legal Secured Parcel, excluding agricultural secured parcels not improved with a residential dwelling unit located in County Service Area No. 6, commencing Fiscal Year 2017/2018?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4896, "fingerprint": "2016|201600125|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600125|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "82bb98028f6500ba", "measure_id": "201600125", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To pay for the servicing of the construction loan liability funding the construction of the new County jail, shall the County of Siskiyou enact a half-cent sales tax for the term of the construction loan, requiring an expenditure plan and annual audit review to ensure funds are spent locally as promised for the benefit of constructing the new County jail?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8081, "no_votes": 8130, "total_votes": 16211, "percent_yes": 49.8488680525569, "percent_no": 50.1511319474431, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.466261", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.808544", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To pay for the servicing of the construction loan liability funding the construction of the new County jail, shall the County of Siskiyou enact a half-cent sales tax for the term of the construction loan, requiring an expenditure plan and annual audit review to ensure funds are spent locally as promised for the benefit of constructing the new County jail?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4897, "fingerprint": "2016|201600126|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600126|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "c931065cae466721", "measure_id": "201600126", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance 15-19 which establishes new limits, conditions, and restrictions related to the cultivation of medical marijuana be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9741, "no_votes": 6473, "total_votes": 16214, "percent_yes": 60.07771062045146, "percent_no": 39.92228937954854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.466561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.808722", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 15-19 which establishes new limits, conditions, and restrictions related to the cultivation of medical marijuana be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4898, "fingerprint": "2016|201600127|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600127|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "c1fa128c8992f5ff", "measure_id": "201600127", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance 15-18 which establishes new procedures for code enforcement related to the cultivation of medical marijuana be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9572, "no_votes": 6682, "total_votes": 16254, "percent_yes": 58.89011935523564, "percent_no": 41.10988064476436, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.466859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.808902", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 15-18 which establishes new procedures for code enforcement related to the cultivation of medical marijuana be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4903, "fingerprint": "2016|201600494|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600494|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "ebc4042d7dd1e451", "measure_id": "201600494", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall \u201cAn Ordinance of the City of Dunsmuir Modifying Chapter 8.08 to Title 8 of the City of Dunsmuir Municipal Code Concerning Refuse Collection and Disposal\u201d be adopted, modifying Dunsmuir Municipal Code chapters codified under Title 8 of the Dunsmuir Municipal Code dealing with garbage services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 222, "no_votes": 470, "total_votes": 692, "percent_yes": 32.080924855491325, "percent_no": 67.91907514450867, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.468315", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.809825", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall \u201cAn Ordinance of the City of Dunsmuir Modifying Chapter 8.08 to Title 8 of the City of Dunsmuir Municipal Code Concerning Refuse Collection and Disposal\u201d be adopted, modifying Dunsmuir Municipal Code chapters codified under Title 8 of the Dunsmuir Municipal Code dealing with garbage services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4904, "fingerprint": "2016|201600495|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600495|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "825d89f9eedd70be", "measure_id": "201600495", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Ordinance #H2O be adopted, modifying Dunsmuir Municipal Code chapters codified under\r\nTitle 13 of the Dunsmuir Municipal Code dealing with water and sewer services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233, "no_votes": 457, "total_votes": 690, "percent_yes": 33.768115942028984, "percent_no": 66.23188405797102, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.468585", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.810026", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Ordinance #H2O be adopted, modifying Dunsmuir Municipal Code chapters codified under\r\nTitle 13 of the Dunsmuir Municipal Code dealing with water and sewer services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4905, "fingerprint": "2016|201600496|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600496|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "f8ff1ae61a021944", "measure_id": "201600496", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Dunsmuir Municipal Code be amended to add Chapter 17.34 regulating medical marijuana cultivation within the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 247, "no_votes": 447, "total_votes": 694, "percent_yes": 35.590778097982714, "percent_no": 64.4092219020173, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.468850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.810211", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Dunsmuir Municipal Code be amended to add Chapter 17.34 regulating medical marijuana cultivation within the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4910, "fingerprint": "2016|201600134|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600134|SOLANO", "content_hash": "7ad1773759e11d92", "measure_id": "201600134", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the people of Solano County enact a one-quarter of one percent sales tax for general governmental purposes such as improving children\u2019s services to homeless children, preventing child abuse, improving access to high quality childcare and preventative child health care programs, providing employment opportunities for youths and other essential services for ten years and assure public accountability by means of a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84010, "no_votes": 72729, "total_votes": 156739, "percent_yes": 53.59865764104658, "percent_no": 46.40134235895342, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.470279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.811124", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of Solano County enact a one-quarter of one percent sales tax for general governmental purposes such as improving children\u2019s services to homeless children, preventing child abuse, improving access to high quality childcare and preventative child health care programs, providing employment opportunities for youths and other essential services for ten years and assure public accountability by means of a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4907, "fingerprint": "2016|201600131|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600131|SOLANO", "content_hash": "c9ac6c8127701fb7", "measure_id": "201600131", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51482, "no_votes": 43248, "total_votes": 94730, "percent_yes": 54.34603610260741, "percent_no": 45.65396389739259, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.469391", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.810578", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4912, "fingerprint": "2016|201600136|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600136|SOLANO", "content_hash": "a5812b3d748b911f", "measure_id": "201600136", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Board of Supervisors provide prevention oriented children's services promoting and improving Solano County children's health, safety and educational success and require oversight and accountability by allocating 100% of the tax revenue collected from any transactions and use tax measure authorized in the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Solano County on the November 8, 2016 ballot?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91448, "no_votes": 62641, "total_votes": 154089, "percent_yes": 59.34751993977506, "percent_no": 40.65248006022494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.470904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.811507", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Board of Supervisors provide prevention oriented children's services promoting and improving Solano County children's health, safety and educational success and require oversight and accountability by allocating 100% of the tax revenue collected from any transactions and use tax measure authorized in the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Solano County on the November 8, 2016 ballot?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4911, "fingerprint": "2016|201600135|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600135|SOLANO", "content_hash": "c1afd870a335bc12", "measure_id": "201600135", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the people of Solano County adopt Ordinance No. 2016 \u2013 1773 to amend Article XII of Chapter 11 of the Solano County Code to establish a general business license tax on marijuana businesses within the County of no more than 15% of annual gross receipts of the business, and which will continue until repealed by the Board of Supervisors or County voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97895, "no_votes": 58603, "total_votes": 156498, "percent_yes": 62.55351506089535, "percent_no": 37.44648493910465, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.470559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.811314", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of Solano County adopt Ordinance No. 2016 \u2013 1773 to amend Article XII of Chapter 11 of the Solano County Code to establish a general business license tax on marijuana businesses within the County of no more than 15% of annual gross receipts of the business, and which will continue until repealed by the Board of Supervisors or County voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4924, "fingerprint": "2016|201600825|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600825|SOLANO", "content_hash": "94aef109cfd8570d", "measure_id": "201600825", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize, renovate and/or construct classrooms, restrooms, cafeterias, and other school facilities including Winters High School; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Winters Joint Unified School District issue $17,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 299, "no_votes": 195, "total_votes": 494, "percent_yes": 60.526315789473685, "percent_no": 39.473684210526315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.474836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.813898", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize, renovate and/or construct classrooms, restrooms, cafeterias, and other school facilities including Winters High School; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Winters Joint Unified School District issue $17,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4909, "fingerprint": "2016|201600133|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600133|SOLANO", "content_hash": "5355cf236393a62c", "measure_id": "201600133", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall Solano County allocate 100% of proceeds of any new voter approved taxes on the June 2016 ballot to transportation improvements, including road safety repairs, filling potholes, maintaining local streets and roads, and protecting transportation for seniors and disabled persons, keeping revenues in local communities and requiring that a citizen oversight committee approve all projects before funds are spent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60811, "no_votes": 33449, "total_votes": 94260, "percent_yes": 64.51410990876299, "percent_no": 35.48589009123701, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.470005", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.810944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall Solano County allocate 100% of proceeds of any new voter approved taxes on the June 2016 ballot to transportation improvements, including road safety repairs, filling potholes, maintaining local streets and roads, and protecting transportation for seniors and disabled persons, keeping revenues in local communities and requiring that a citizen oversight committee approve all projects before funds are spent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11312, "fingerprint": "2016|201600823|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600823|SOLANO", "content_hash": "b839d2fcd625ed76", "measure_id": "201600823", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide outstanding academics in math, science, reading, writing, instructional technology and programs in athletics, arts and music; provide high quality teachers; limit class sizes; and support student health and safety; shall the Davis Joint Unified School District replace its expiring parcel taxes with a single eight-year parcel tax of $620/year, raising approximately $9.5 million/year, adjusted for inflation; with senior and disability exemptions; with citizens oversight; for the exclusive use of Davis schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 28, "percent_yes": 57.14285714285714, "percent_no": 42.85714285714286, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.825116", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.474175", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.813529", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide outstanding academics in math, science, reading, writing, instructional technology and programs in athletics, arts and music; provide high quality teachers; limit class sizes; and support student health and safety; shall the Davis Joint Unified School District replace its expiring parcel taxes with a single eight-year parcel tax of $620/year, raising approximately $9.5 million/year, adjusted for inflation; with senior and disability exemptions; with citizens oversight; for the exclusive use of Davis schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4908, "fingerprint": "2016|201600132|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600132|SOLANO", "content_hash": "2513eccf273b1184", "measure_id": "201600132", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the people of Solano County enact a one-half percent sales tax for general governmental purposes such as maintenance and repair of local streets and roads, pothole repairs, road safety projects, senior and disabled mobility and other essential services within the seven cities and unincorporated area for 5 years with annual audits made available to the public showing how all revenue was spent the previous year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42120, "no_votes": 52982, "total_votes": 95102, "percent_yes": 44.2892893945448, "percent_no": 55.7107106054552, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.469704", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.810763", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of Solano County enact a one-half percent sales tax for general governmental purposes such as maintenance and repair of local streets and roads, pothole repairs, road safety projects, senior and disabled mobility and other essential services within the seven cities and unincorporated area for 5 years with annual audits made available to the public showing how all revenue was spent the previous year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4922, "fingerprint": "2016|201600822|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600822|SOLANO", "content_hash": "8d80cfec9d1fc4f9", "measure_id": "201600822", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, provide safe and modern schools for all students with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade, modernize and construct classrooms, science labs and libraries; improve student access to technology; repair leaky roofs, outdated electrical and plumbing systems; and improve safety, security and access for students with disabilities shall Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District issue $249,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens\u2019 oversight, audits and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15511, "no_votes": 11818, "total_votes": 27329, "percent_yes": 56.75655896666545, "percent_no": 43.24344103333455, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.473898", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.813332", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, provide safe and modern schools for all students with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade, modernize and construct classrooms, science labs and libraries; improve student access to technology; repair leaky roofs, outdated electrical and plumbing systems; and improve safety, security and access for students with disabilities shall Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District issue $249,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens\u2019 oversight, audits and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4913, "fingerprint": "2016|201600498|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600498|SOLANO", "content_hash": "2da9c709447680a6", "measure_id": "201600498", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help fund general municipal services, including but not limited to police and fire protection services, parks, recreation and library facilities, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on marijuana businesses and dispensaries, if marijuana businesses or dispensaries are approved to operate in the City of Dixon?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4635, "no_votes": 2506, "total_votes": 7141, "percent_yes": 64.90687578770479, "percent_no": 35.09312421229521, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.471325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.811688", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help fund general municipal services, including but not limited to police and fire protection services, parks, recreation and library facilities, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a business license tax at a rate of up to fifteen percent (15%) of gross receipts on marijuana businesses and dispensaries, if marijuana businesses or dispensaries are approved to operate in the City of Dixon?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4919, "fingerprint": "2016|201600504|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600504|SOLANO", "content_hash": "3379726cc2cce258", "measure_id": "201600504", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer for the City of Dixon be appointive, with the first appointment occurring upon the expiration of the term of the current City Treasurer in 2016?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4276, "no_votes": 2652, "total_votes": 6928, "percent_yes": 61.720554272517326, "percent_no": 38.279445727482674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.473092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.812788", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer for the City of Dixon be appointive, with the first appointment occurring upon the expiration of the term of the current City Treasurer in 2016?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4917, "fingerprint": "2016|201600502|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600502|SOLANO", "content_hash": "cd00e9ba4a1e0079", "measure_id": "201600502", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect essential city services such as police programs to fight domestic violence, child/elder abuse, gang activity and neighborhood crime; fire/paramedic services for quick emergency response times; street lighting for safety; and other city services, shall City of Vacaville Ordinance No. 1899 be approved to renew a sales/use tax at a 3/4- cent rate for 20 years, providing approximately $14,700,000 per year in locally controlled funding that stays in Vacaville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22495, "no_votes": 13046, "total_votes": 35541, "percent_yes": 63.293098112039615, "percent_no": 36.706901887960385, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.472511", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.812419", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect essential city services such as police programs to fight domestic violence, child/elder abuse, gang activity and neighborhood crime; fire/paramedic services for quick emergency response times; street lighting for safety; and other city services, shall City of Vacaville Ordinance No. 1899 be approved to renew a sales/use tax at a 3/4- cent rate for 20 years, providing approximately $14,700,000 per year in locally controlled funding that stays in Vacaville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4921, "fingerprint": "2016|201600506|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600506|SOLANO", "content_hash": "e55f378ac8299f13", "measure_id": "201600506", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer for the City of Rio Vista be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2593, "no_votes": 2074, "total_votes": 4667, "percent_yes": 55.5603171202057, "percent_no": 44.4396828797943, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.473623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.813151", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer for the City of Rio Vista be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4915, "fingerprint": "2016|201600500|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600500|SOLANO", "content_hash": "418aea987aa4d913", "measure_id": "201600500", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support the continued operations of Rio Vista general services, including paramedic services (first responders to a medical emergency and transport to a medical center or hospital, when needed), adequate police and fire protection, properly maintained community and neighborhood parks, and other city services, shall the existing 3/4-cent sales tax charged on purchases made in Rio Vista, generating approximately $784,000 annually, be continued for an additional five (5) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3938, "no_votes": 932, "total_votes": 4870, "percent_yes": 80.86242299794661, "percent_no": 19.13757700205339, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.471926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.812047", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support the continued operations of Rio Vista general services, including paramedic services (first responders to a medical emergency and transport to a medical center or hospital, when needed), adequate police and fire protection, properly maintained community and neighborhood parks, and other city services, shall the existing 3/4-cent sales tax charged on purchases made in Rio Vista, generating approximately $784,000 annually, be continued for an additional five (5) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4914, "fingerprint": "2016|201600499|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600499|SOLANO", "content_hash": "0260cb3f4fde8852", "measure_id": "201600499", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To renew expiring funding without increasing tax rates, shall the Ordinance be adopted extending the existing 1% sales tax for fifteen years to preserve approximately $16 million in local annual funding for the City of Fairfield that the state cannot take away to support neighborhood police patrols, firefighting and rapid 9-1-1 emergency response, crime prevention programs, fixing potholes and repairing neighborhood streets, parks and recreation, and other general services, with mandatory audits and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25128, "no_votes": 11293, "total_votes": 36421, "percent_yes": 68.99316328491804, "percent_no": 31.00683671508196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.471642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.811867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew expiring funding without increasing tax rates, shall the Ordinance be adopted extending the existing 1% sales tax for fifteen years to preserve approximately $16 million in local annual funding for the City of Fairfield that the state cannot take away to support neighborhood police patrols, firefighting and rapid 9-1-1 emergency response, crime prevention programs, fixing potholes and repairing neighborhood streets, parks and recreation, and other general services, with mandatory audits and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4923, "fingerprint": "2016|201600824|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600824|SOLANO", "content_hash": "92d67f73f94ba288", "measure_id": "201600824", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, renovate and reopen Old Dixon High School as a middle school, repair and renovate Anderson Elementary School, and improve security/safety and Americans with Disabilities Act compliance at District schools, shall Dixon Unified School District issue $30,400,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual independent audits, and no funds spent on administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4966, "no_votes": 3281, "total_votes": 8247, "percent_yes": 60.21583606159816, "percent_no": 39.78416393840184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.474526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.813712", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, renovate and reopen Old Dixon High School as a middle school, repair and renovate Anderson Elementary School, and improve security/safety and Americans with Disabilities Act compliance at District schools, shall Dixon Unified School District issue $30,400,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, annual independent audits, and no funds spent on administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4916, "fingerprint": "2016|201600501|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600501|SOLANO", "content_hash": "2ba6c84a825ec179", "measure_id": "201600501", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding, that cannot be taken by the State, to maintain Suisun City services that make neighborhoods safer including: rapid 911 emergency responses, neighborhood police patrols, youth crime/gang prevention, fire prevention/protection, fixing potholes, maintaining City streets/streetlights, maintaining City parks/street trees, and other vital City services, shall Suisun City enact a one-cent (1%) sales tax for ten years, providing $1,800,000 annually, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent locally in Suisun City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6497, "no_votes": 2915, "total_votes": 9412, "percent_yes": 69.02889927751806, "percent_no": 30.971100722481935, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.472203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.812228", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding, that cannot be taken by the State, to maintain Suisun City services that make neighborhoods safer including: rapid 911 emergency responses, neighborhood police patrols, youth crime/gang prevention, fire prevention/protection, fixing potholes, maintaining City streets/streetlights, maintaining City parks/street trees, and other vital City services, shall Suisun City enact a one-cent (1%) sales tax for ten years, providing $1,800,000 annually, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, all funds spent locally in Suisun City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4920, "fingerprint": "2016|201600505|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600505|SOLANO", "content_hash": "e0ae24389ff696a2", "measure_id": "201600505", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Resolution be approved amending the Fairfield General Plan to revise the Urban Limit Line, if specified conditions are met, and reaffirm and amend certain General Plan policies to allow property at I-680 and Gold Hill Road to be a land preserve and open space conservation area with an interpretive center, trails, and theater for educational purposes to celebrate and educate the public about the conservation of migratory birds along the Pacific Flyway?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26108, "no_votes": 9782, "total_votes": 35890, "percent_yes": 72.74449707439398, "percent_no": 27.255502925606024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.473357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.812971", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Resolution be approved amending the Fairfield General Plan to revise the Urban Limit Line, if specified conditions are met, and reaffirm and amend certain General Plan policies to allow property at I-680 and Gold Hill Road to be a land preserve and open space conservation area with an interpretive center, trails, and theater for educational purposes to celebrate and educate the public about the conservation of migratory birds along the Pacific Flyway?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4918, "fingerprint": "2016|201600503|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600503|SOLANO", "content_hash": "d181f5d9741e17b2", "measure_id": "201600503", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an \u201cOrdinance Amending Vallejo Municipal Code to Maintain Enhanced Funding for 911 Response, Police Patrols, Firefighter and Emergency Medical Services, Youth Programs, Street and Pothole Repair, Graffiti Removal, Economic Development, and Other General City Services, Renewing the Existing, Voter-Approved, One Percent Transactions and Use (Sales) Tax (Measure B) to Provide Approximately $14 Million Yearly with All Revenues Independently Audited and Expenditures Publicly Reviewed and Locally Controlled\u201d be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26207, "no_votes": 14739, "total_votes": 40946, "percent_yes": 64.00380989596053, "percent_no": 35.99619010403947, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.472822", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.812601", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an \u201cOrdinance Amending Vallejo Municipal Code to Maintain Enhanced Funding for 911 Response, Police Patrols, Firefighter and Emergency Medical Services, Youth Programs, Street and Pothole Repair, Graffiti Removal, Economic Development, and Other General City Services, Renewing the Existing, Voter-Approved, One Percent Transactions and Use (Sales) Tax (Measure B) to Provide Approximately $14 Million Yearly with All Revenues Independently Audited and Expenditures Publicly Reviewed and Locally Controlled\u201d be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4925, "fingerprint": "2016|201600137|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600137|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c9ac6c8127701fb7", "measure_id": "201600137", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95663, "no_votes": 53114, "total_votes": 148777, "percent_yes": 64.29958931824139, "percent_no": 35.70041068175861, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.475106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.814089", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect San Francisco Bay for future generations by reducing trash, pollution and harmful toxins, improving water quality, restoring habitat for fish, birds and wildlife, protecting communities from floods, and increasing shoreline public access, shall the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority authorize a parcel tax of $12 per year, raising approximately $25 million annually for twenty years with independent citizen oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4941, "fingerprint": "2016|201600826|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600826|SONOMA", "content_hash": "92228c1ff46959c8", "measure_id": "201600826", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve quality education despite inadequate state funding and prevent further program cuts, shall the Kenwood School District renew \u2013 without increasing \u2013the existing school parcel tax of $52.00 per year for a period of five years, beginning July 1, 2017, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election? Funds to be used for maintaining and enhancing core programs and essential enrichment programs and continuing our commitment to small class sizes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1353, "no_votes": 395, "total_votes": 1748, "percent_yes": 77.40274599542334, "percent_no": 22.597254004576655, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-08-30", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.479973", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.817036", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve quality education despite inadequate state funding and prevent further program cuts, shall the Kenwood School District renew \u2013 without increasing \u2013the existing school parcel tax of $52.00 per year for a period of five years, beginning July 1, 2017, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election? Funds to be used for maintaining and enhancing core programs and essential enrichment programs and continuing our commitment to small class sizes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4944, "fingerprint": "2016|201600829|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600829|SONOMA", "content_hash": "2a7934bdd7f8f963", "measure_id": "201600829", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To bring all classrooms up to the same standard and protect quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District improve classrooms, science labs and libraries to meet modern educational/safety standards; remove lead/asbestos where found; and add multiuse classrooms for performing arts/science/vocational education programs; by issuing $80 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12897, "no_votes": 7117, "total_votes": 20014, "percent_yes": 64.4398920755471, "percent_no": 35.56010792445289, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.480797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.817603", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To bring all classrooms up to the same standard and protect quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District improve classrooms, science labs and libraries to meet modern educational/safety standards; remove lead/asbestos where found; and add multiuse classrooms for performing arts/science/vocational education programs; by issuing $80 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4946, "fingerprint": "2016|201600831|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600831|SONOMA", "content_hash": "2283a58da77ebb4e", "measure_id": "201600831", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; construct, modernize, and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall Healdsburg Unified School District issue $67,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, and have no money used for administrative salaries", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5455, "no_votes": 2792, "total_votes": 8247, "percent_yes": 66.14526494482843, "percent_no": 33.854735055171574, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.481418", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.817978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; construct, modernize, and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall Healdsburg Unified School District issue $67,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, and have no money used for administrative salaries", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4947, "fingerprint": "2016|201600832|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600832|SONOMA", "content_hash": "35adda68490258fc", "measure_id": "201600832", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs and school facilities to meet safety and academic standards; repair/replace leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing and outdated/ inefficient heating and cooling systems; ensure schools are accessible for students with disabilities; and expand student access to computers and modern technology, shall Sonoma Valley Unified School District issue $120,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, no money for administrative salaries, and all funds locally-controlled to benefit local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12845, "no_votes": 5401, "total_votes": 18246, "percent_yes": 70.39899155979393, "percent_no": 29.601008440206073, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.481698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.818167", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs and school facilities to meet safety and academic standards; repair/replace leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing and outdated/ inefficient heating and cooling systems; ensure schools are accessible for students with disabilities; and expand student access to computers and modern technology, shall Sonoma Valley Unified School District issue $120,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, no money for administrative salaries, and all funds locally-controlled to benefit local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4949, "fingerprint": "2016|201600834|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600834|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4976a76f3e4ad513", "measure_id": "201600834", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Windsor schools by providing 21st Century classrooms, upgrading libraries and science labs, improving classroom technology, updating safety and security, renovating and modernizing older schools, repairing and replacing roofs, adding classrooms, building a new elementary school to avoid overcrowding, and acquiring, constructing and renovating school facilities shall the Windsor Unified School District issue $62 million in bonds at legal interest rates with an Independent Oversight Committee and no funds for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7880, "no_votes": 4837, "total_votes": 12717, "percent_yes": 61.96429975623181, "percent_no": 38.03570024376819, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.482234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.818536", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Windsor schools by providing 21st Century classrooms, upgrading libraries and science labs, improving classroom technology, updating safety and security, renovating and modernizing older schools, repairing and replacing roofs, adding classrooms, building a new elementary school to avoid overcrowding, and acquiring, constructing and renovating school facilities shall the Windsor Unified School District issue $62 million in bonds at legal interest rates with an Independent Oversight Committee and no funds for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4945, "fingerprint": "2016|201600830|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600830|SONOMA", "content_hash": "8ac80d6ef9153be2", "measure_id": "201600830", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; modernize, construct, and/or renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; increase student access to modern technology; and make needed energy and water conservation improvements, shall the Guerneville School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight and use No money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1861, "no_votes": 737, "total_votes": 2598, "percent_yes": 71.6320246343341, "percent_no": 28.3679753656659, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.481116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.817791", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; modernize, construct, and/or renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; increase student access to modern technology; and make needed energy and water conservation improvements, shall the Guerneville School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight and use No money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4942, "fingerprint": "2016|201600827|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600827|SONOMA", "content_hash": "1efffe937671ffda", "measure_id": "201600827", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renew the community\u2019s commitment to great local schools by enhancing computer and technology education, maintaining libraries, preserving classroom and instrumental music programs, and supporting science programs with $1.1 million In annual funding, shall the Rincon Valley Union School District renew its existing annual tax beginning In 2018 for twelve years at the rate of $96 per parcel with annual $3 increases and a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by senior citizens 65 years and older", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14400, "no_votes": 5923, "total_votes": 20323, "percent_yes": 70.85568075579393, "percent_no": 29.144319244206073, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.480248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.817224", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew the community\u2019s commitment to great local schools by enhancing computer and technology education, maintaining libraries, preserving classroom and instrumental music programs, and supporting science programs with $1.1 million In annual funding, shall the Rincon Valley Union School District renew its existing annual tax beginning In 2018 for twelve years at the rate of $96 per parcel with annual $3 increases and a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by senior citizens 65 years and older", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4943, "fingerprint": "2016|201600828|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600828|SONOMA", "content_hash": "13ecda6daed9631f", "measure_id": "201600828", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away, protect academic programs in reading assistance, writing, math, art, science and vocal and instrumental music, retain qualified teachers, maintain student counseling services, and provide books and instructional materials, shall the Wilmar Union School District be authorized to levy $75 per parcel annually for nine (9) years, (approximate total $79,500 annual funds raised): have no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, provide a senior citizens\u2019 exemption and have all funds stay local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1160, "no_votes": 605, "total_votes": 1765, "percent_yes": 65.72237960339945, "percent_no": 34.277620396600554, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.480521", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.817416", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away, protect academic programs in reading assistance, writing, math, art, science and vocal and instrumental music, retain qualified teachers, maintain student counseling services, and provide books and instructional materials, shall the Wilmar Union School District be authorized to levy $75 per parcel annually for nine (9) years, (approximate total $79,500 annual funds raised): have no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, provide a senior citizens\u2019 exemption and have all funds stay local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4926, "fingerprint": "2016|201600138|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600138|SONOMA", "content_hash": "7d2fff47bccdfa80", "measure_id": "201600138", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To expand, maintain, and restore Sonoma County parks for future generations; protect drinking water sources, streams, and rivers; protect natural areas; preserve fish and wildlife habitat; reduce wildfire risk and; increase walking, hiking, and biking trails, shall Sonoma County establish a half cent sales tax in the unincorporated areas of Sonoma County for ten years providing $9.5 million annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45444, "no_votes": 24346, "total_votes": 69790, "percent_yes": 65.11534603811434, "percent_no": 34.88465396188566, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.475381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.814274", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand, maintain, and restore Sonoma County parks for future generations; protect drinking water sources, streams, and rivers; protect natural areas; preserve fish and wildlife habitat; reduce wildfire risk and; increase walking, hiking, and biking trails, shall Sonoma County establish a half cent sales tax in the unincorporated areas of Sonoma County for ten years providing $9.5 million annually, with citizens\u2019 oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4929, "fingerprint": "2016|201600141|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600141|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c2c1ee9bc6de4f7d", "measure_id": "201600141", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to preserve rural open space and agricultural land, maintain community identities, and prevent sprawl, shall the \u201cCommunity Separators Protection Ordinance\u201d be adopted to amend the Sonoma County General Plan to require voter approval of changes to the General Plan that increase the allowed density or intensity of development within Community Separators until December 31, 2036, and to repeal Ordinance 5145R?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 173309, "no_votes": 39596, "total_votes": 212905, "percent_yes": 81.4020337709307, "percent_no": 18.5979662290693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.476252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.814829", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to preserve rural open space and agricultural land, maintain community identities, and prevent sprawl, shall the \u201cCommunity Separators Protection Ordinance\u201d be adopted to amend the Sonoma County General Plan to require voter approval of changes to the General Plan that increase the allowed density or intensity of development within Community Separators until December 31, 2036, and to repeal Ordinance 5145R?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4927, "fingerprint": "2016|201600139|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600139|SONOMA", "content_hash": "aab953ad11ba9d58", "measure_id": "201600139", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To address the impacts of tourists by investing in roads, emergency response, workforce housing for families and veterans, water quality protection, and other County services, shall Sonoma County increase the transient occupancy tax from 9% to 12%, until repealed, and paid only by guests staying overnight at lodging facilities within the unincorporated area, in line with many neighboring cities and counties, providing $4 million annually to local County services, subject to annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 149472, "no_votes": 69666, "total_votes": 219138, "percent_yes": 68.20907373435917, "percent_no": 31.790926265640834, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.475684", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.814465", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address the impacts of tourists by investing in roads, emergency response, workforce housing for families and veterans, water quality protection, and other County services, shall Sonoma County increase the transient occupancy tax from 9% to 12%, until repealed, and paid only by guests staying overnight at lodging facilities within the unincorporated area, in line with many neighboring cities and counties, providing $4 million annually to local County services, subject to annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4930, "fingerprint": "2016|201600142|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600142|SONOMA", "content_hash": "13ba5f6999a2dc6e", "measure_id": "201600142", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the \u201cSonoma County Transgenic Contamination Prevention Ordinance,\u201d which would 1) prohibit the propagation, cultivation, raising, or growing of genetically engineered organisms, as defined in the ordinance, in the unincorporated County; 2) require the Sonoma County Agricultural Commissioner to enforce the ordinance by assessing a civil monetary penalty or pursuing an injunction against violators; and 3) provide for fines and fees for each violation, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 122399, "no_votes": 90947, "total_votes": 213346, "percent_yes": 57.37112483946266, "percent_no": 42.62887516053734, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.476523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.815016", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \u201cSonoma County Transgenic Contamination Prevention Ordinance,\u201d which would 1) prohibit the propagation, cultivation, raising, or growing of genetically engineered organisms, as defined in the ordinance, in the unincorporated County; 2) require the Sonoma County Agricultural Commissioner to enforce the ordinance by assessing a civil monetary penalty or pursuing an injunction against violators; and 3) provide for fines and fees for each violation, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4933, "fingerprint": "2016|201600509|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600509|SONOMA", "content_hash": "620e6924545ac389", "measure_id": "201600509", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain financial stability and funding, without increasing taxes, for city services, such as police/fire protection; 9-1-1 emergency response; street/pothole repair; parks/recreation programs; affordable housing/homelessness services; and other general city services, shall the City of Santa Rosa extend an existing, voter-approved 1/4 cent sales tax for eight additional years, providing approximately $8 million annually; requiring independent audits, public spending review, and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50114, "no_votes": 19001, "total_votes": 69115, "percent_yes": 72.50813860956377, "percent_no": 27.491861390436227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.477396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.815574", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain financial stability and funding, without increasing taxes, for city services, such as police/fire protection; 9-1-1 emergency response; street/pothole repair; parks/recreation programs; affordable housing/homelessness services; and other general city services, shall the City of Santa Rosa extend an existing, voter-approved 1/4 cent sales tax for eight additional years, providing approximately $8 million annually; requiring independent audits, public spending review, and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4938, "fingerprint": "2016|201600514|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600514|SONOMA", "content_hash": "46f6c50d2ecbf25b", "measure_id": "201600514", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Rosa amend the minimum funding requirements for public safety services, including police, fire, and gang-prevention, to reflect City FY 2015-16 General Fund budget levels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47950, "no_votes": 18502, "total_votes": 66452, "percent_yes": 72.15734665623307, "percent_no": 27.842653343766926, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.479079", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.816492", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Rosa amend the minimum funding requirements for public safety services, including police, fire, and gang-prevention, to reflect City FY 2015-16 General Fund budget levels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4931, "fingerprint": "2016|201600507|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600507|SONOMA", "content_hash": "dac1c9f9d704f4ec", "measure_id": "201600507", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund essential City services such as police, streets, parks, libraries, senior and youth programs, shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a tax on all permitted cannabis businesses in Cloverdale, at a rate of up to 10% on gross receipts, to raise estimated revenues of $90,000 per business, with no sunset date, subject to audits, with funds staying in Cloverdale, allowing for the tax rate to vary by business activity type?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2742, "no_votes": 975, "total_votes": 3717, "percent_yes": 73.76916868442292, "percent_no": 26.230831315577078, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.476789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.815204", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund essential City services such as police, streets, parks, libraries, senior and youth programs, shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a tax on all permitted cannabis businesses in Cloverdale, at a rate of up to 10% on gross receipts, to raise estimated revenues of $90,000 per business, with no sunset date, subject to audits, with funds staying in Cloverdale, allowing for the tax rate to vary by business activity type?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4935, "fingerprint": "2016|201600511|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600511|SONOMA", "content_hash": "886046f4737a06a6", "measure_id": "201600511", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the General Plan of the City of Cotati to extend the current Urban Growth Boundary for an additional 30 years be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2267, "no_votes": 991, "total_votes": 3258, "percent_yes": 69.58256599140577, "percent_no": 30.417434008594228, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.478072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.815936", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the General Plan of the City of Cotati to extend the current Urban Growth Boundary for an additional 30 years be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4936, "fingerprint": "2016|201600512|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600512|SONOMA", "content_hash": "2ff4f50358c84b54", "measure_id": "201600512", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Healdsburg voters amend the existing Growth Management Ordinance to increase inclusionary housing requirements on new development to 30%, remove existing restrictions on the number of new residential units allowed per year, adopt and periodically amend new growth management measures in conjunction with the Housing Element update, and adopt and periodically update a Housing Action Plan to provide a greater variety of housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2304, "no_votes": 3362, "total_votes": 5666, "percent_yes": 40.66360748323332, "percent_no": 59.33639251676668, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.478395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.816119", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Healdsburg voters amend the existing Growth Management Ordinance to increase inclusionary housing requirements on new development to 30%, remove existing restrictions on the number of new residential units allowed per year, adopt and periodically amend new growth management measures in conjunction with the Housing Element update, and adopt and periodically update a Housing Action Plan to provide a greater variety of housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4932, "fingerprint": "2016|201600508|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600508|SONOMA", "content_hash": "b869755c69ac16e3", "measure_id": "201600508", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase, improve and preserve the City\u2019s affordable housing stock, shall the City of Healdsburg be authorized to levy an ongoing 2% transient occupancy tax (or \u201chotel\u201d tax) on persons who occupy hotel rooms for 30 days or less, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to 14%, and providing an estimated minimum $530,123 annually, with all funds of the additional tax restricted to affordable housing services and programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3814, "no_votes": 1760, "total_votes": 5574, "percent_yes": 68.4248295658414, "percent_no": 31.575170434158593, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.477096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.815386", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase, improve and preserve the City\u2019s affordable housing stock, shall the City of Healdsburg be authorized to levy an ongoing 2% transient occupancy tax (or \u201chotel\u201d tax) on persons who occupy hotel rooms for 30 days or less, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to 14%, and providing an estimated minimum $530,123 annually, with all funds of the additional tax restricted to affordable housing services and programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4937, "fingerprint": "2016|201600513|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600513|SONOMA", "content_hash": "8d2023b09b500044", "measure_id": "201600513", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Healdsburg institute a moratorium on water fluoridation in the city until such time as the manufacturer of the fluoridating chemical provides information regarding the identification of any contaminants in the fluoridating chemical batch, and a toxicological report and verification of safety for the fluoridating chemical?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2433, "no_votes": 3223, "total_votes": 5656, "percent_yes": 43.01626591230552, "percent_no": 56.98373408769448, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.478778", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.816303", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Healdsburg institute a moratorium on water fluoridation in the city until such time as the manufacturer of the fluoridating chemical provides information regarding the identification of any contaminants in the fluoridating chemical batch, and a toxicological report and verification of safety for the fluoridating chemical?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4934, "fingerprint": "2016|201600510|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600510|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f85d6505e7649aea", "measure_id": "201600510", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue funding, that cannot be taken by the State, for general city services including preserving the quality of life of Sonoma, and to provide funding for essential services such as police, fire and emergency medical services, street maintenance, affordable housing, parks and other general community services, shall the City of Sonoma extend the existing voter approved sales tax of one-half of one percent for a term of 5 years, with all funds to be spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4306, "no_votes": 1568, "total_votes": 5874, "percent_yes": 73.30609465440926, "percent_no": 26.693905345590736, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.477763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.815755", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding, that cannot be taken by the State, for general city services including preserving the quality of life of Sonoma, and to provide funding for essential services such as police, fire and emergency medical services, street maintenance, affordable housing, parks and other general community services, shall the City of Sonoma extend the existing voter approved sales tax of one-half of one percent for a term of 5 years, with all funds to be spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4939, "fingerprint": "2016|201600515|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600515|SONOMA", "content_hash": "8224468955a6803a", "measure_id": "201600515", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sonoma City Council Ordinance No. 01-2016 banning the use of gas leaf blowers within the City's limits but permitting the use of electric and battery-powered leaf blowers under specified regulations be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2975, "no_votes": 2956, "total_votes": 5931, "percent_yes": 50.16017534985669, "percent_no": 49.83982465014331, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.479355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.816674", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sonoma City Council Ordinance No. 01-2016 banning the use of gas leaf blowers within the City's limits but permitting the use of electric and battery-powered leaf blowers under specified regulations be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4940, "fingerprint": "2016|201600516|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600516|SONOMA", "content_hash": "999934dc675b9581", "measure_id": "201600516", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to more comprehensively protect the health and safety of the citizens of Sonoma shall an ordinance be adopted that amends the City's existing 1992 smoking ordinance to include more protections by prohibiting smoking in public places, multi-unit residences, hotels and motels, enclosed common areas, enclosed dining areas, outdoor recreational areas and parks, outdoor public places, outdoor dining areas and within 25 feet of any area where smoking is prohibited?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4156, "no_votes": 1725, "total_votes": 5881, "percent_yes": 70.66825369835063, "percent_no": 29.331746301649375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.479665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.816855", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to more comprehensively protect the health and safety of the citizens of Sonoma shall an ordinance be adopted that amends the City's existing 1992 smoking ordinance to include more protections by prohibiting smoking in public places, multi-unit residences, hotels and motels, enclosed common areas, enclosed dining areas, outdoor recreational areas and parks, outdoor public places, outdoor dining areas and within 25 feet of any area where smoking is prohibited?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4948, "fingerprint": "2016|201600833|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600833|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ace593167b8aa50b", "measure_id": "201600833", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair or replace outdated plumbing and sewer systems; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Waugh School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money used for administrators ' salaries and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 628, "no_votes": 317, "total_votes": 945, "percent_yes": 66.45502645502646, "percent_no": 33.544973544973544, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.481968", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.818355", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair or replace outdated plumbing and sewer systems; and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Waugh School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money used for administrators ' salaries and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4928, "fingerprint": "2016|201600140|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600140|SONOMA", "content_hash": "78859511e3cdd3b0", "measure_id": "201600140", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain, restore/enhance Library services including: maintaining children's/teen books, materials/ services; providing educational services, including homework help/computer labs; expanding senior/disabled services; keeping qualified librarians; restoring library hours; shall the Sonoma County Library increase the sales tax by 1/8 of a percent, providing $12,000,000 annually for ten years, and increase the spending limit to allow use of the revenue, with independent audits, citizen oversight, requiring all funds go to Sonoma County Library/no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 159857, "no_votes": 62208, "total_votes": 222065, "percent_yes": 71.98658050570779, "percent_no": 28.013419494292208, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.475982", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.814647", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain, restore/enhance Library services including: maintaining children's/teen books, materials/ services; providing educational services, including homework help/computer labs; expanding senior/disabled services; keeping qualified librarians; restoring library hours; shall the Sonoma County Library increase the sales tax by 1/8 of a percent, providing $12,000,000 annually for ten years, and increase the spending limit to allow use of the revenue, with independent audits, citizen oversight, requiring all funds go to Sonoma County Library/no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4951, "fingerprint": "2016|201600517|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600517|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "9aef5db45d465192", "measure_id": "201600517", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to allow the Board of Education for Modesto City Schools to change the method of election of the Board of Education in accordance with the California Education Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31281, "no_votes": 14734, "total_votes": 46015, "percent_yes": 67.98000651961317, "percent_no": 32.01999348038683, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.482848", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.818901", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to allow the Board of Education for Modesto City Schools to change the method of election of the Board of Education in accordance with the California Education Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4958, "fingerprint": "2016|201600840|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600840|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "3ab70db16743a424", "measure_id": "201600840", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/acquire career technical education classrooms; renovate/repair aging classrooms; replace leaking pipes; repair or replace roofs; and update fire/life safety systems at Richard M. Moon Primary, Waterford Junior, Lucille Whitehead Intermediate, Waterford High and other district facilities, shall Waterford Unified School District be authorized to issue $10.65 million of bonds with rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries or taken by the State and NO increase in existing tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1960, "no_votes": 1079, "total_votes": 3039, "percent_yes": 64.49489963803883, "percent_no": 35.50510036196117, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.484818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.820289", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/acquire career technical education classrooms; renovate/repair aging classrooms; replace leaking pipes; repair or replace roofs; and update fire/life safety systems at Richard M. Moon Primary, Waterford Junior, Lucille Whitehead Intermediate, Waterford High and other district facilities, shall Waterford Unified School District be authorized to issue $10.65 million of bonds with rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries or taken by the State and NO increase in existing tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4950, "fingerprint": "2016|201600143|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600143|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "05a471bc39641322", "measure_id": "201600143", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide funding for local transportation improvements including: fixing potholes/maintaining streets; improving emergency response; providing safe routes to schools; providing senior, veterans and disabled shuttle services; and improving safety/reducing traffic congestion on Highway 99/major streets; shall the Stanislaus County Transportation Authority enact a \u00bd cent sales tax, generating $38,000,000 annually for transportation projects, funds that cannot be taken by the State, requiring all money to be spent in Stanislaus County with citizens\u2019 oversight for 25 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121527, "no_votes": 47372, "total_votes": 168899, "percent_yes": 71.95246863510145, "percent_no": 28.047531364898546, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.482540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.818715", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for local transportation improvements including: fixing potholes/maintaining streets; improving emergency response; providing safe routes to schools; providing senior, veterans and disabled shuttle services; and improving safety/reducing traffic congestion on Highway 99/major streets; shall the Stanislaus County Transportation Authority enact a \u00bd cent sales tax, generating $38,000,000 annually for transportation projects, funds that cannot be taken by the State, requiring all money to be spent in Stanislaus County with citizens\u2019 oversight for 25 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4952, "fingerprint": "2016|201600518|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600518|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "5ca026eecc9e4fa7", "measure_id": "201600518", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To finance construction of community pool and splash pad, creating access to quality recreational opportunities for children, youth, adults, and seniors, including swimming lessons, water safety classes, and health and fitness programs; shall City of Newman Community Facilities District 2016-1 incur indebtedness not exceeding $6,500,000, levy a special tax annually on taxable parcels (described in Resolution 2016-25), with discounts for low-income seniors, requiring audits, no increases to tax rate and establishing appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2017/18 at $750,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1821, "no_votes": 1160, "total_votes": 2981, "percent_yes": 61.086883596108684, "percent_no": 38.913116403891316, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.483118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.819084", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance construction of community pool and splash pad, creating access to quality recreational opportunities for children, youth, adults, and seniors, including swimming lessons, water safety classes, and health and fitness programs; shall City of Newman Community Facilities District 2016-1 incur indebtedness not exceeding $6,500,000, levy a special tax annually on taxable parcels (described in Resolution 2016-25), with discounts for low-income seniors, requiring audits, no increases to tax rate and establishing appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2017/18 at $750,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4953, "fingerprint": "2016|201600838|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600838|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "9eb6dbce131ef409", "measure_id": "201600838", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade and repair elementary schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Turlock Unified School District provide new classrooms/instructional technology, including necessary infrastructure, for core academics including math, science, reading/writing; modernize classrooms to meet health/safety codes; improve campus safety/security; repair, construct, acquire, equip, classrooms, sites, facilities; by issuing $40,800,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used for Turlock Schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15697, "no_votes": 6955, "total_votes": 22652, "percent_yes": 69.29630937665549, "percent_no": 30.703690623344514, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.483385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.819265", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and repair elementary schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Turlock Unified School District provide new classrooms/instructional technology, including necessary infrastructure, for core academics including math, science, reading/writing; modernize classrooms to meet health/safety codes; improve campus safety/security; repair, construct, acquire, equip, classrooms, sites, facilities; by issuing $40,800,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used for Turlock Schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4954, "fingerprint": "2016|201600839|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600839|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a6f30f75fbbe495c", "measure_id": "201600839", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade and repair high schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Turlock Unified School District provide science, technology/engineering labs; provide new classrooms/instructional technology, including necessary infrastructure, for core academics; modernize facilities to meet health/safety codes; improve campus safety/security; repair, construct, acquire, equip, classrooms, sites, facilities; by issuing $48,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used for Turlock Schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17115, "no_votes": 8111, "total_votes": 25226, "percent_yes": 67.84666613811147, "percent_no": 32.15333386188853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.483653", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.819488", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and repair high schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Turlock Unified School District provide science, technology/engineering labs; provide new classrooms/instructional technology, including necessary infrastructure, for core academics; modernize facilities to meet health/safety codes; improve campus safety/security; repair, construct, acquire, equip, classrooms, sites, facilities; by issuing $48,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds used for Turlock Schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4957, "fingerprint": "2016|201600837|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600837|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "62aae75ac4eb1544", "measure_id": "201600837", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue the job of repairing and improving our schools; replacing portables with permanent classrooms; and constructing new classrooms and facilities, shall $11.090 million of Newman Crows Landing Unified School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates at or below legal limits, citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2713, "no_votes": 1137, "total_votes": 3850, "percent_yes": 70.46753246753246, "percent_no": 29.532467532467535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.484547", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.820099", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue the job of repairing and improving our schools; replacing portables with permanent classrooms; and constructing new classrooms and facilities, shall $11.090 million of Newman Crows Landing Unified School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates at or below legal limits, citizen oversight, annual audits, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4955, "fingerprint": "2016|201600835|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600835|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "7b9bf485a1cc021b", "measure_id": "201600835", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade elementary and middle school classrooms, a new restroom facility at the middle school, install a new field irrigation system at the elementary school and for student safety install a security camera system, shall Hughson Unified School District School Facilities improvement District No. 1 issue $3,200,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee and No money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2352, "no_votes": 1559, "total_votes": 3911, "percent_yes": 60.13807210432115, "percent_no": 39.86192789567885, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.483961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.819706", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade elementary and middle school classrooms, a new restroom facility at the middle school, install a new field irrigation system at the elementary school and for student safety install a security camera system, shall Hughson Unified School District School Facilities improvement District No. 1 issue $3,200,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee and No money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4956, "fingerprint": "2016|201600836|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600836|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "4bc3bacf915b9f4d", "measure_id": "201600836", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of school education and atmosphere, install a new air conditioning system in the gym, re-roof the gym, provide an all-weather track and for student safety install a security camera system, shall Hughson Unified School District issue $2.2 million of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee and No money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2936, "no_votes": 1896, "total_votes": 4832, "percent_yes": 60.76158940397352, "percent_no": 39.23841059602648, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.484267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.819904", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of school education and atmosphere, install a new air conditioning system in the gym, re-roof the gym, provide an all-weather track and for student safety install a security camera system, shall Hughson Unified School District issue $2.2 million of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee and No money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4959, "fingerprint": "2016|201600842|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600842|SUTTER", "content_hash": "8520cb62bb59764d", "measure_id": "201600842", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18276, "no_votes": 12794, "total_votes": 31070, "percent_yes": 58.8220148052784, "percent_no": 41.1779851947216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.485091", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.820482", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4960, "fingerprint": "2016|201600841|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600841|SUTTER", "content_hash": "fda274677ce26e7c", "measure_id": "201600841", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade/renovate P.E./Sports fields and facilities for school and community use; construct multi-use facilities at school sites that meet health, safety and handicapped accessibility requirements; and modernize outdated classrooms; shall the Live Oak Unified School District issue $14,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2050, "no_votes": 976, "total_votes": 3026, "percent_yes": 67.74619960343688, "percent_no": 32.25380039656312, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.485411", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.820672", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade/renovate P.E./Sports fields and facilities for school and community use; construct multi-use facilities at school sites that meet health, safety and handicapped accessibility requirements; and modernize outdated classrooms; shall the Live Oak Unified School District issue $14,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1317, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 67|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 67|Statewide", "content_hash": "8855ddad3b22c594", "measure_id": "Proposition 67", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Referendum to Overturn Ban on Single-Use Plastic Bags", "description": "If signed by the required number of registered voters and timely filed with the Secretary of State, this petition will place on the statewide ballot a challenge to a state law previously approved by the Legislature and the Governor. The challenged law must then be approved by a majority of voters at the next statewide election to go into effect. The law prohibits grocery and certain other retail stores from providing single-use bags but permits sale of recycled paper bags and reusable bags.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.0, "percent_no": 48.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Popular Referendum", "topic_primary": "Business & Commerce", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure challenged a state law that prohibited grocery and certain retai...", "summary_text": "This measure challenged a state law that prohibited grocery and certain retail stores from providing single-use bags while allowing the sale of recycled paper bags and reusable bags. A \"yes\" vote supported the bag ban law, while a \"no\" vote opposed it.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Referendum to Overturn Ban on Single-Use Plastic Bags", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Referendum%20to%20Overturn%20Ban%20on%20Single-Use%20Plastic%20B%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1316, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 66|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 66|Statewide", "content_hash": "0a9693befda1699a", "measure_id": "Proposition 66", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Death Penalty Revision", "description": "Changes procedures governing state court appeals and petitions challenging death penalty convictions and sentences. Designates superior court for initial petitions and limits successive petitions. Imposes time limits on state court death penalty review. Requires appointed attorneys who take noncapital appeals to accept death penalty appeals. Exempts prison officials from existing regulation process for developing execution methods. Authorizes death row inmate transfers among California state prisons. States death row inmates must work and pay victim restitution. States other voter approved measures related to death penalty are null and void if this measure receives more affirmative votes.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.9, "percent_no": 49.1, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Criminal Justice", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed California's death penalty appeal procedures by imposing...", "summary_text": "This measure changed California's death penalty appeal procedures by imposing time limits on court reviews, requiring certain attorneys to accept death penalty cases, and allowing prison officials to develop execution methods without standard regulatory processes. It also authorized transfers of death row inmates between prisons and required them to work and pay victim restitution.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Death Penalty Revision", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Death%20Penalty%20Revision%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1314, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 65|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 65|Statewide", "content_hash": "9e813d20d7a8fa75", "measure_id": "Proposition 65", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Environmental Fund from Reusable Bag Fees", "description": "Redirects money collected by grocery and certain other retail stores through sale of carry-out bags, whenever any state law bans free distribution of a particular kind of carry-out bag and mandates the sale of any other kind of carry-out bag. Requires stores to deposit bag sale proceeds into a special fund administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board to support specified categories of environmental projects. Provides for Board to develop regulations implementing law.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.7, "percent_no": 55.3, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Environmental Protection", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required grocery and retail stores to deposit proceed...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required grocery and retail stores to deposit proceeds from mandatory carry-out bag sales into a state environmental fund administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board, rather than allowing stores to keep the revenue. The fund would have supported specified environmental projects through regulations developed by the Board.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Environmental Fund from Reusable Bag Fees", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Environmental%20Fund%20from%20Reusable%20Bag%20Fees%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1311, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 64|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 64|Statewide", "content_hash": "53d18f5bb938971f", "measure_id": "Proposition 64", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Legalization of Marijuana for Adults Over 21", "description": "Legalizes marijuana and hemp under state law. Designates state agencies to license and regulate marijuana industry. Imposes state excise tax on retail sales of marijuana equal to 15% of sales price, and state cultivation taxes on marijuana of $9.25 per ounce of flowers and $2.75 per ounce of leaves. Exempts medical marijuana from some taxation. Establishes packaging, labeling, advertising, and marketing standards and restrictions for marijuana products. Allows local regulation and taxation of marijuana. Prohibits marketing and advertising marijuana to minors. Authorizes resentencing and destruction of records for prior marijuana convictions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.800000000000004, "percent_no": 44.199999999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Business & Commerce", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure legalized recreational marijuana and hemp under California state...", "summary_text": "This measure legalized recreational marijuana and hemp under California state law, establishing a regulatory framework with designated state agencies to oversee licensing, taxation (15% excise tax on retail sales plus cultivation taxes), and safety standards. It also allowed local governments to regulate and tax marijuana within their jurisdictions and provided for the resentencing of individuals with prior marijuana convictions.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Legalization of Marijuana for Adults Over 21", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Legalization%20of%20Marijuana%20for%20Adults%20Over%2021%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1310, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 63|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 63|Statewide", "content_hash": "8829e032cb2df6ed", "measure_id": "Proposition 63", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Safety For All Act", "description": "Prohibits possession of large-capacity ammunition magazines, and requires their disposal by sale to dealer, destruction, or removal from state. Requires most individuals to pass background check and obtain Department of Justice authorization to purchase ammunition. Requires most ammunition sales be made through licensed ammunition vendors and reported to Department of Justice. Requires lost or stolen firearms and ammunition be reported to law enforcement. Prohibits persons convicted of stealing a firearm from possessing firearms. Establishes new procedures for enforcing laws prohibiting firearm possession by felons and violent criminals. Requires Department of Justice to provide information about prohibited persons to federal National Instant Criminal Background Check System.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.6, "percent_no": 37.4, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Criminal Justice", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure prohibits possession of large-capacity ammunition magazines and ...", "summary_text": "This measure prohibits possession of large-capacity ammunition magazines and requires background checks and Department of Justice authorization for most ammunition purchases, with sales required to go through licensed vendors. It also establishes new enforcement procedures for existing firearm possession prohibitions and requires reporting of lost or stolen firearms and ammunition to law enforcement.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Safety For All Act", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Safety%20For%20All%20Act%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1309, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 62|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 62|Statewide", "content_hash": "2b6434fc65eaf62b", "measure_id": "Proposition 62", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Justice That Works Act (Capital Punishment)", "description": "Repeals death penalty as maximum punishment for persons found guilty of murder and replaces it with life imprisonment without possibility of parole. Applies retroactively to persons already sentenced to death. States that persons found guilty of murder and sentenced to life without possibility of parole must work while in prison as prescribed by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Increases to 60% the portion of wages earned by persons sentenced to life without the possibility of parole that may be applied to any victim restitution fines or orders against them.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.1, "percent_no": 53.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Criminal Justice", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have repealed California's death penalty and replaced it w...", "summary_text": "This measure would have repealed California's death penalty and replaced it with life imprisonment without parole, applying retroactively to current death row inmates. It also would have required those sentenced to life without parole for murder to work in prison, with 60% of their wages potentially going toward victim restitution.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Justice That Works Act (Capital Punishment)", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Justice%20That%20Works%20Act%20%28Capital%20Punishment%29%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1307, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 61|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 61|Statewide", "content_hash": "2b5717263e4d52ba", "measure_id": "Proposition 61", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Drug Price Relief Act", "description": "Prohibits state agencies from paying more for a prescription drug than the lowest price paid for the same drug by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. Applies to any program where the state is the ultimate payer for a drug, even if the state does not purchase the drug directly. Exempts certain purchases of prescription drugs funded through Medi-Cal.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.300000000000004, "percent_no": 53.699999999999996, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Health", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited California state agencies from paying more...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited California state agencies from paying more for prescription drugs than the lowest price paid by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, applying to programs where the state is the ultimate payer. The measure included exemptions for certain Medi-Cal-funded prescription drug purchases.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Drug Price Relief Act", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=California%20Drug%20Price%20Relief%20Act%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1306, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 60|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 60|Statewide", "content_hash": "8ef5d695e41909ac", "measure_id": "Proposition 60", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "California Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act", "description": "Requires performers in adult films to use condoms during filming of sexual intercourse. Requires producers of adult films to pay for performer vaccinations, testing, and medical examinations related to sexually transmitted infections. Requires producers to obtain state health license at beginning of filming and to post condom requirement at film sites. Imposes liability on producers for violations, on certain distributors, on performers if they have a financial interest in the violating film, and on talent agents who knowingly refer performers to noncomplying producers. Permits state, performers, or any state resident to enforce violations.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.1, "percent_no": 53.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Health", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required condom use during filming of adult films and...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required condom use during filming of adult films and mandated that producers pay for performer health testing, vaccinations, and medical examinations related to sexually transmitted infections. It also would have established a state licensing system for adult film production and created liability for producers, distributors, performers with financial interests, and talent agents who violate the requirements.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "California Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=California%20Safer%20Sex%20in%20the%20Adult%20Film%20Industry%20Ac%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1305, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 59|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 59|Statewide", "content_hash": "08b62c626cf2c7e6", "measure_id": "Proposition 59", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Overturn Citizens United Act", "description": "Requires the Secretary of State to submit to the voters at the November 8, 2016, consolidating election a voter instruction asking whether California's elected officials should use all of their constitutional authority, including proposing and ratifying one or more amendments to the United States Constitution. to overturn Citizens United vs. Federal Elections Commissions, and other applicable judicial precedents.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.300000000000004, "percent_no": 47.699999999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required the Secretary of State to include a non-binding voter i...", "summary_text": "This measure required the Secretary of State to include a non-binding voter instruction on the November 2016 ballot asking whether California officials should use their constitutional authority to overturn the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision through constitutional amendments. The measure passed, making it an advisory vote that instructs California's elected officials to work toward overturning Citizens United and related campaign finance rulings.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Overturn Citizens United Act", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Overturn%20Citizens%20United%20Act%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1304, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 58|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 58|Statewide", "content_hash": "341afe7f642dcbad", "measure_id": "Proposition 58", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "English Language Education", "description": "Amends and repeals various provisions of Proposition 227. Deletes sheltered English immersion requirements and waivers. Provides that school districts and county offices of education shall provide English learners with a structured English immersion program. Authorizes parents and guardians to choose a language acquisition program best suited for their child. Requires solicitation of input for appropriate instructional methods.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.39999999999999, "percent_no": 27.60000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Legislative Referendum", "topic_primary": "Education: PreK-12", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure amended California's English-only education requirements ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure amended California's English-only education requirements by removing mandatory sheltered English immersion programs and allowing parents to choose from various language acquisition programs for their children. It also required schools to seek input from stakeholders when determining appropriate instructional methods for English learners.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "English Language Education", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=English%20Language%20Education%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1303, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 57|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 57|Statewide", "content_hash": "a8158efc2a0a42e1", "measure_id": "Proposition 57", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Prison Sentence Reform Amendment", "description": "Allows parole consideration for persons convicted of nonviolent felonies upon completion of full prison term for primary offense, as defined. Authorizes Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to award sentence credits for rehabilitation, good behavior, or educational achievements. Requires Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to adopt regulations to implement new parole and sentence credit provisions and certify they enhance public safety. Provides juvenile court judges shall make determination, upon prosecutor motion, whether juveniles age 14 and older should be prosecuted and sentenced as adults", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.6, "percent_no": 36.4, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Criminal Justice", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows parole consideration for people convicted of nonviolent f...", "summary_text": "This measure allows parole consideration for people convicted of nonviolent felonies after completing their primary sentence and authorizes additional sentence credits for rehabilitation, good behavior, or educational achievements. It also requires that juvenile court judges, rather than prosecutors, make the determination of whether juveniles aged 14 and older should be tried as adults.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Prison Sentence Reform Amendment", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Prison%20Sentence%20Reform%20Amendment%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1300, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 56|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 56|Statewide", "content_hash": "19dd71f4bb5de5b3", "measure_id": "Proposition 56", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Cigarette Tax Increase Amendment", "description": "Increases cigarette tax by $2.00 per pack, with equivalent increase on other tobacco products and electronic cigarettes containing nicotine. Allocates revenues primarily to increase funding for existing healthcare programs; also for tobacco use prevention/control programs, tobacco-related disease research and law enforcement, University of California physician training, dental disease prevention programs, and administration. Excludes these revenues from Proposition 98 funding requirements. If tax causes decreased tobacco consumption, transfers tax revenues to offset decreases to existing tobacco-funded programs and sales tax revenues. Requires biennial audit.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.9, "percent_no": 37.1, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the cigarette tax by $2", "summary_text": "This measure increased the cigarette tax by $2.00 per pack and applied equivalent increases to other tobacco products and electronic cigarettes containing nicotine. The tax revenue is allocated primarily to healthcare programs, with additional funding for tobacco prevention, disease research, law enforcement, physician training, dental programs, and administration.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Cigarette Tax Increase Amendment", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Cigarette%20Tax%20Increase%20Amendment%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1299, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 55|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 55|Statewide", "content_hash": "e61f7bd343d5c981", "measure_id": "Proposition 55", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Extension of Temporary Personal Income Tax Increase Amendment", "description": "Extends by twelve years the temporary personal income tax increases enacted in 2012 on earnings over $250,000 (for single filers; over $500,000 for joint filers; over $340,000 for heads of household). Allocates these tax revenues 89% to K-12 schools and 11% to California Community Colleges. Allocates up to $2 billion per year in certain years for healthcare programs. Bars use of education revenues for administrative costs, but provides local school governing boards discretion to decide, in open meetings and subject to annual audit, how revenues are to be spent.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.1, "percent_no": 37.9, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Tax & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended temporary personal income tax increases on high earners...", "summary_text": "This measure extended temporary personal income tax increases on high earners (over $250,000 for single filers) for twelve years, with 89% of revenues going to K-12 schools and 11% to community colleges. It also allocated up to $2 billion annually in certain years for healthcare programs and prohibited using education revenues for administrative costs.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Extension of Temporary Personal Income Tax Increase Amendment", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Extension%20of%20Temporary%20Personal%20Income%20Tax%20Increas%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1298, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 54|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 54|Statewide", "content_hash": "77e4caced11b6577", "measure_id": "Proposition 54", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Legislative Transparency Act", "description": "Prohibits Legislature from passing any bill unless it has been in print and published on the Internet for at least 72 hours before the vote, except in cases of public emergency. Requires the Legislature to make audiovisual recordings of all its proceedings, except closed session proceedings, and post them on the Internet. Authorizes any person to record legislative proceedings by audio or video means, except closed session proceedings. Allows recordings of legislative proceedings to be used for any legitimate purpose, without payment of any fee to the State.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.3, "percent_no": 35.7, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Legislatures", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure requires California legislative bills to be published online for...", "summary_text": "This measure requires California legislative bills to be published online for at least 72 hours before voting (except during public emergencies) and mandates that all legislative proceedings be recorded and posted online, while allowing public recording of these proceedings.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Legislative Transparency Act", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Legislative%20Transparency%20Act%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1295, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 53|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 53|Statewide", "content_hash": "f142751bdde46e53", "measure_id": "Proposition 53", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "No Blank Checks Initiative", "description": "Requires statewide voter approval before any revenue bonds can be issued or sold by the state for projects that are financed, owned, operated, or managed by the state or any joint agency created by or including the state, if the bond amount exceeds $2 billion. Prohibits dividing projects into multiple separate projects to avoid statewide voter approval requirement.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.6, "percent_no": 51.4, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Bond Measures", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required statewide voter approval for any state reven...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required statewide voter approval for any state revenue bonds exceeding $2 billion used for projects financed, owned, operated, or managed by the state or joint agencies including the state. It would have prohibited splitting projects into smaller parts to circumvent the voter approval requirement.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "No Blank Checks Initiative", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=No%20Blank%20Checks%20Initiative%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1293, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 52|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 52|Statewide", "content_hash": "0d84e9c404467fa4", "measure_id": "Proposition 52", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "State Fees on Hospitals Federal Medi-Cal Matching Funds", "description": "Increases required vote to two-thirds for the Legislature to amend a certain existing law that imposes fees on hospitals (for purpose of obtaining federal Medi-Cal matching funds) and that directs those fees and federal matching funds to hospital-provided Medi-Cal health care services, to uncompensated care provided by hospitals to uninsured patients, and to children's health coverage. Eliminates law's ending date. Declares that law's fee proceeds shall not be considered revenues for purposes of applying state spending limit or determining required education funding.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.6, "percent_no": 30.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Health", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the legislative vote requirement from a simple majorit...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the legislative vote requirement from a simple majority to two-thirds for amending California's existing hospital fee law, which imposes fees on hospitals to generate federal Medicaid matching funds for healthcare services. It also made the hospital fee law permanent by removing its expiration date and exempted the fee proceeds from state spending limits and education funding calculations.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "State Fees on Hospitals Federal Medi-Cal Matching Funds", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=State%20Fees%20on%20Hospitals%20Federal%20Medi-Cal%20Matching%20%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1290, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 51|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 51|Statewide", "content_hash": "a244f991cd177556", "measure_id": "Proposition 51", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Kindergarten through Community College Public Education Facilities Bond Act", "description": "Authorizes $9 billion in general obligation bonds: $3 billion for new construction and $3 billion for modernization of K-12 public school facilities; $1 billion for charter schools and vocational education facilities; and $2 billion for California Community Colleges facilities. Bars amendment to existing authority to levy developer fees to fund school facilities, until new construction bond proceeds are spent or December 31, 2020, whichever is earlier. Bars amendment to existing State Allocation Board process for allocating school construction funding, as to these bonds. Appropriates money from the General Fund to pay off bonds.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.0, "percent_no": 46.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Bond Measures", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized $9 billion in general obligation bonds to fund constr...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized $9 billion in general obligation bonds to fund construction and modernization of K-12 schools ($6 billion), charter schools and vocational facilities ($1 billion), and community college facilities ($2 billion). It also prohibited changes to existing developer fee authority and state funding allocation processes until the bond proceeds are spent or December 31, 2020.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Kindergarten through Community College Public Education Facilities Bond Act", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Kindergarten%20through%20Community%20College%20Public%20Educ%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1289, "fingerprint": "2016|PROP 50|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|PROP 50|Statewide", "content_hash": "100aaf426e36a103", "measure_id": "Proposition 50", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Suspension of Legislators Amendment", "description": "Requires that to suspend a member of either house of the Legislature, a motion or resolution to that effect shall be adopted by a 2/3 vote of the of the membership of the house. Prohibits a suspended Member from exercising any rights, privileges, duties, or powers of office, or any resource of the Legislature, while suspended. Requires that same vote to remove a suspension. Authorizes forfeiture of salary and benefits of the member.\u00a0", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.3, "percent_no": 24.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Legislative Referendum", "topic_primary": "Legislatures", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a constitutional requirement that suspending a membe...", "summary_text": "This measure established a constitutional requirement that suspending a member of the California Legislature requires a two-thirds vote of the membership of that house, and prohibits suspended members from exercising any legislative powers or accessing legislative resources. It also allows for the forfeiture of salary and benefits during suspension and requires the same two-thirds vote to lift a suspension.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Suspension of Legislators Amendment", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Suspension%20of%20Legislators%20Amendment%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1260, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1238|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1238|Statewide", "content_hash": "16a765851837d767", "measure_id": "CA1238", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 50", "description": "Suspension of Legislators Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.30000305, "percent_no": 24.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure suspended the pay and benefits of state legislators during perio...", "summary_text": "This measure suspended the pay and benefits of state legislators during periods when they are expelled or suspended from the legislature for misconduct. It amended the state constitution to ensure that legislators do not receive compensation while serving disciplinary suspensions or expulsions.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 50", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_50_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2050%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2050%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1259, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1237|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1237|Statewide", "content_hash": "2a39421ca6637d78", "measure_id": "CA1237", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 58", "description": "English Language Education", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.40000153, "percent_no": 27.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 58", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_58_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2058%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2058%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1258, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1236|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1236|Statewide", "content_hash": "28ee0b9c4b87b54e", "measure_id": "CA1236", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 52", "description": "State Fees on Hospitals Federal Medi-Cal Matching Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.59999847, "percent_no": 30.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to continue imposing fees on hospitals to g...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to continue imposing fees on hospitals to generate federal matching funds for Medi-Cal, California's Medicaid program. The fees collected from hospitals would be used to draw down additional federal healthcare funding for the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 52", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_52_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2052%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2052%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1257, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1235|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1235|Statewide", "content_hash": "b5e2db4c31076c74", "measure_id": "CA1235", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 54", "description": "Legislative Transparency Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.30000305, "percent_no": 35.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 54", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_54_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2054%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2054%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1256, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1234|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1234|Statewide", "content_hash": "833fb51b3941a5d7", "measure_id": "CA1234", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 57", "description": "Prison Sentence Reform Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.59999847, "percent_no": 36.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reclassified certain non-violent property and drug felonies as m...", "summary_text": "This measure reclassified certain non-violent property and drug felonies as misdemeanors and allowed inmates currently serving sentences for these crimes to petition for resentencing. It also permitted individuals with past convictions for these offenses to apply to have their felony records reduced to misdemeanors.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 57", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_57_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2057%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2057%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1255, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1233|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1233|Statewide", "content_hash": "571c8298a4be2971", "measure_id": "CA1233", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 56", "description": "Cigarette Tax Increase Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.90000153, "percent_no": 37.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Health | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased California's cigarette tax by $2", "summary_text": "This measure increased California's cigarette tax by $2.00 per pack and imposed equivalent tax increases on other tobacco products. The additional revenue is allocated to healthcare programs, tobacco prevention efforts, and research initiatives.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 56", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_56_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2056%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2056%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1254, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1232|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1232|Statewide", "content_hash": "4840b7753ca1088c", "measure_id": "CA1232", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 63", "description": "Safety For All Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.59999847, "percent_no": 37.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 63", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_63_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2063%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2063%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1253, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1231|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1231|Statewide", "content_hash": "72d77929e46d6857", "measure_id": "CA1231", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 55", "description": "Extension of Temporary Personal Income Tax Increase Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.09999847, "percent_no": 37.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended temporary personal income tax increases on high-income ...", "summary_text": "This measure extended temporary personal income tax increases on high-income earners (those making over $250,000 annually) that were set to expire in 2018, making them permanent to fund education and healthcare programs. The tax rates range from 1% to 3% additional tax depending on income level, with revenue specifically designated for public schools, community colleges, and mental health services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 55", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_55_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2055%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2055%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1252, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1230|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1230|Statewide", "content_hash": "aff712136733a6d3", "measure_id": "CA1230", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 64", "description": "Legalization of Marijuana for Adults Over 21", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.79999924, "percent_no": 44.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure legalized the recreational use, possession, and cultivation of m...", "summary_text": "This measure legalized the recreational use, possession, and cultivation of marijuana for adults 21 and older in California. It established a regulatory framework for commercial marijuana businesses and imposed state taxes on marijuana sales.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 64", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_64_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2064%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2064%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1251, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1229|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1229|Statewide", "content_hash": "bec4bf7f426ae184", "measure_id": "CA1229", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 51", "description": "Kindergarten through Community College Public Education Facilities Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.0, "percent_no": 46.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized California to issue $7 billion in general obligation ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized California to issue $7 billion in general obligation bonds to fund construction, modernization, and repair of facilities for K-12 schools, community colleges, and California State University and University of California campuses. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes over approximately 35 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 51", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_51_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2051%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2051%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1250, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1228|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1228|Statewide", "content_hash": "1d95c68efec826f7", "measure_id": "CA1228", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 59", "description": "Overturn Citizens United Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.29999924, "percent_no": 47.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 59", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_59_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2059%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2059%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1249, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1227|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1227|Statewide", "content_hash": "5db20f3a34708d0b", "measure_id": "CA1227", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 67", "description": "Referendum to Overturn Ban on Single-Use Plastic Bags", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.0, "percent_no": 48.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Environmental Protection\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure overturned a state law that banned single-use plastic bags at gr...", "summary_text": "This measure overturned a state law that banned single-use plastic bags at grocery stores and retail establishments. The referendum allowed stores to continue providing plastic bags to customers rather than implementing the planned ban.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 67", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_67_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2067%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2067%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1248, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1226|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1226|Statewide", "content_hash": "181bdfa99c51f328", "measure_id": "CA1226", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 66", "description": "Death Penalty Revision", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.90000153, "percent_no": 49.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 66", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_66_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2066%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2066%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1247, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1225|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1225|Statewide", "content_hash": "03d25913832f99c5", "measure_id": "CA1225", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 53", "description": "No Blank Checks Initiative", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.59999847, "percent_no": 51.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 53", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_53_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2053%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2053%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1246, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1224|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1224|Statewide", "content_hash": "51bff1111b06bf7b", "measure_id": "CA1224", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 61", "description": "California Drug Price Relief Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.29999924, "percent_no": 53.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required state agencies to pay no more for prescripti...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required state agencies to pay no more for prescription drugs than the lowest amount paid by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for the same medications. It would have applied to state programs including Medicaid, state employee health plans, and the California Public Employees' Retirement System.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 61", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_61_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2061%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2061%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1245, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1223|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1223|Statewide", "content_hash": "727de2798cd0d4b4", "measure_id": "CA1223", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 62", "description": "Justice That Works Act (Capital Punishment)", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.09999847, "percent_no": 53.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have replaced California's death penalty with life impriso...", "summary_text": "This measure would have replaced California's death penalty with life imprisonment without the possibility of parole as the maximum punishment for murder. It also would have required those convicted of murder to work and pay restitution to victims' families with their earnings.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 62", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_62_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2062%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2062%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1244, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1222|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1222|Statewide", "content_hash": "28ff768325766a22", "measure_id": "CA1222", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 60", "description": "California Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.09999847, "percent_no": 53.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required adult film performers to use condoms during ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required adult film performers to use condoms during filming and mandated that producers obtain permits and pay for performer health and safety training. It also would have allowed private citizens to sue to enforce these requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 60", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_60_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2060%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2060%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1243, "fingerprint": "2016|CA1221|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|CA1221|Statewide", "content_hash": "33e30708557cc6b3", "measure_id": "CA1221", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 65", "description": "Environmental Fund from Reusable Bag Fees", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.70000076, "percent_no": 55.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required stores to direct proceeds from mandatory reu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required stores to direct proceeds from mandatory reusable bag fees to a state environmental fund rather than keeping the revenue. The fees were established under California's plastic bag ban that took effect in 2016.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 65", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_65_(2016)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2016/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2016", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2065%202016", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2065%202016", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 4962, "fingerprint": "2016|201600519|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600519|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "2d3b9c6bbe1dee0d", "measure_id": "201600519", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance of the City of Corning authorizing a transactions and use tax (sales tax) of one-half of one percent to raise, annually with no set duration, approximately one million dollars ($1,000,000) in general fund revenues to be used for existing police and fire services, or any other lawful municipal use, to be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 770, "no_votes": 423, "total_votes": 1193, "percent_yes": 64.54316848281643, "percent_no": 35.45683151718357, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.485983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.821065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance of the City of Corning authorizing a transactions and use tax (sales tax) of one-half of one percent to raise, annually with no set duration, approximately one million dollars ($1,000,000) in general fund revenues to be used for existing police and fire services, or any other lawful municipal use, to be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4963, "fingerprint": "2016|201600846|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600846|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "b3885ca4893d7ece", "measure_id": "201600846", "measure_letter": "H/J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12884, "no_votes": 9947, "total_votes": 22831, "percent_yes": 56.43204415049713, "percent_no": 43.56795584950287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.486257", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.821256", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4964, "fingerprint": "2016|201600845|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600845|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "088a856c8359e938", "measure_id": "201600845", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and upgrade classroom/career technology by upgrading classrooms and technology for 21st century learning; improving science labs/facilities for agriculture, nursing, and special education; repairing wiring, plumbing, and restrooms; improving disabled student access; and acquiring, constructing, and modernizing facilities and equipment, shall Red Bluff Joint Union High School District issue $26 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9356, "no_votes": 7210, "total_votes": 16566, "percent_yes": 56.47712181576724, "percent_no": 43.52287818423276, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.486532", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.821461", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and upgrade classroom/career technology by upgrading classrooms and technology for 21st century learning; improving science labs/facilities for agriculture, nursing, and special education; repairing wiring, plumbing, and restrooms; improving disabled student access; and acquiring, constructing, and modernizing facilities and equipment, shall Red Bluff Joint Union High School District issue $26 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, independent audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4965, "fingerprint": "2016|201600843|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600843|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "3cc18fedfda6fd7d", "measure_id": "201600843", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; update inadequate electrical and technology infrastructure; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall the Corning Union High School District issue $8,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3267, "no_votes": 1837, "total_votes": 5104, "percent_yes": 64.00862068965517, "percent_no": 35.991379310344826, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.486843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.821661", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; update inadequate electrical and technology infrastructure; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall the Corning Union High School District issue $8,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4966, "fingerprint": "2016|201600844|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600844|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "096b0d68d1d250ae", "measure_id": "201600844", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade and reduce overcrowding at Evergreen Elementary School and Evergreen Middle School facilities, support programs in math, science, technology and arts education, improve student safety/security with funding that the State can\u2019t take away, shall Evergreen Union School District construct additional classroom buildings on the Evergreen Middle School campus, acquire, renovate, and reconfigure facilities, by issuing $12,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds staying local, benefitting our neighborhood schools and students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2391, "no_votes": 1834, "total_votes": 4225, "percent_yes": 56.59171597633136, "percent_no": 43.40828402366864, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.487151", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.821886", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade and reduce overcrowding at Evergreen Elementary School and Evergreen Middle School facilities, support programs in math, science, technology and arts education, improve student safety/security with funding that the State can\u2019t take away, shall Evergreen Union School District construct additional classroom buildings on the Evergreen Middle School campus, acquire, renovate, and reconfigure facilities, by issuing $12,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds staying local, benefitting our neighborhood schools and students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4961, "fingerprint": "2016|201600144|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600144|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "7ee92ca11d1f264b", "measure_id": "201600144", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended so that the salary of each member of the Board of Supervisors is increased by an additional $600 per month on July 1st of each year, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020, and shall not otherwise be changed except by a vote of the people at the time of a general election", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4379, "no_votes": 18772, "total_votes": 23151, "percent_yes": 18.91494967819964, "percent_no": 81.08505032180037, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.485715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.820875", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended so that the salary of each member of the Board of Supervisors is increased by an additional $600 per month on July 1st of each year, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020, and shall not otherwise be changed except by a vote of the people at the time of a general election", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4967, "fingerprint": "2016|201600847|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600847|TRINITY", "content_hash": "14ace83ed6fb5893", "measure_id": "201600847", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; make health and safety improvements, including mold, lead, and asbestos abatement; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47, "no_votes": 45, "total_votes": 92, "percent_yes": 51.08695652173913, "percent_no": 48.91304347826087, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.487422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.822089", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; make health and safety improvements, including mold, lead, and asbestos abatement; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4968, "fingerprint": "2016|201600848|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600848|TRINITY", "content_hash": "b3885ca4893d7ece", "measure_id": "201600848", "measure_letter": "H/J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3474, "no_votes": 1958, "total_votes": 5432, "percent_yes": 63.954344624447714, "percent_no": 36.045655375552286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.487749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.822279", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve college classrooms and facilities providing education and job training opportunities for students, local residents/ veterans, renovate and expand science, technology, engineering and math labs, training facilities and programs for fire, law enforcement, emergency medical, welding, manufacturing/automotive jobs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issue $139,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4971, "fingerprint": "2016|201600851|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600851|TULARE", "content_hash": "b53a2d5121f395da", "measure_id": "201600851", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education without increasing the current tax rate; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and security improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Kingsburg Elementary Charter School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82, "no_votes": 78, "total_votes": 160, "percent_yes": 51.24999999999999, "percent_no": 48.75000000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.488629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.822877", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education without increasing the current tax rate; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and security improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Kingsburg Elementary Charter School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4975, "fingerprint": "2016|201600849|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600849|TULARE", "content_hash": "2f32d416d7ec1824", "measure_id": "201600849", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health and safety improvements; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Burton School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1283, "no_votes": 1201, "total_votes": 2484, "percent_yes": 51.65056360708535, "percent_no": 48.34943639291465, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.489832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.823669", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health and safety improvements; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Burton School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4972, "fingerprint": "2016|201600852|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600852|TULARE", "content_hash": "be7e60b7a29ec5fe", "measure_id": "201600852", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Fresno City, Clovis, Reedley Colleges, to prepare students and veterans for jobs/ university transfer by upgrading classroom buildings, labs/technology, upgrading vocational/career education programs, removing lead paint/asbestos, repairing leaky roofs, wiring, gas/sewer lines and acquiring, construct/repairing facilities, sites/equipment, shall State Center Community College District issue $485,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, audits, all funds used locally", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2326, "no_votes": 1451, "total_votes": 3777, "percent_yes": 61.583267143235375, "percent_no": 38.416732856764625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.488938", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.823074", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Fresno City, Clovis, Reedley Colleges, to prepare students and veterans for jobs/ university transfer by upgrading classroom buildings, labs/technology, upgrading vocational/career education programs, removing lead paint/asbestos, repairing leaky roofs, wiring, gas/sewer lines and acquiring, construct/repairing facilities, sites/equipment, shall State Center Community College District issue $485,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, audits, all funds used locally", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4970, "fingerprint": "2016|201600850|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600850|TULARE", "content_hash": "37ab0e943a393a04", "measure_id": "201600850", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; renovate/construct science labs and career technical education classrooms; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $16,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 894, "no_votes": 344, "total_votes": 1238, "percent_yes": 72.21324717285945, "percent_no": 27.786752827140546, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.488355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.822677", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; renovate/construct science labs and career technical education classrooms; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $16,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, annual audits, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4973, "fingerprint": "2016|201600857|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600857|TULARE", "content_hash": "7b162f3368b84c65", "measure_id": "201600857", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms to prepare students/veterans for good-paying jobs/ university transfer by updating labs/classrooms for nursing, welding, construction/high-tech job training, repairing deteriorating gas, electrical/sewer lines, leaky roofs, improving water conservation, ensuring access for disabled, including veterans, repairing, constructing/ acquiring facilities, sites/ equipment, shall Kern Community College District issue $502,821,000 in bonds at legal rates, funds spent locally, with citizen oversight/independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14304, "no_votes": 7706, "total_votes": 22010, "percent_yes": 64.98864152657883, "percent_no": 35.01135847342117, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.489240", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.823271", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms to prepare students/veterans for good-paying jobs/ university transfer by updating labs/classrooms for nursing, welding, construction/high-tech job training, repairing deteriorating gas, electrical/sewer lines, leaky roofs, improving water conservation, ensuring access for disabled, including veterans, repairing, constructing/ acquiring facilities, sites/ equipment, shall Kern Community College District issue $502,821,000 in bonds at legal rates, funds spent locally, with citizen oversight/independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4978, "fingerprint": "2016|201600855|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600855|TULARE", "content_hash": "433bc7d3ddc6abd5", "measure_id": "201600855", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade vocational education and performing arts facilities and classrooms; modernize science labs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make energy efficiency improvements; shall Exeter Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue $18,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2715, "no_votes": 1768, "total_votes": 4483, "percent_yes": 60.56212357796119, "percent_no": 39.43787642203881, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.490689", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.824252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; upgrade vocational education and performing arts facilities and classrooms; modernize science labs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make energy efficiency improvements; shall Exeter Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue $18,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4976, "fingerprint": "2016|201600853|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600853|TULARE", "content_hash": "a9103a95ae4a5e09", "measure_id": "201600853", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health and safety improvements; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Burton School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2640, "no_votes": 1971, "total_votes": 4611, "percent_yes": 57.25439167208849, "percent_no": 42.74560832791151, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.490140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.823867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; repair or replace leaky roofs; make health and safety improvements; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Burton School District issue $6,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4977, "fingerprint": "2016|201600854|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600854|TULARE", "content_hash": "bb5fdc1f7bb22305", "measure_id": "201600854", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for Earlimart students, modernize, construct, and improve classrooms and necessary student support facilities for school and community use, improve health, student safety and security, provide classroom technology infrastructure, and qualify the District for State matching grants, shall the Earlimart School District be authorized to issue up to $6.7 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, Citizens\u2019 Oversight, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 820, "no_votes": 153, "total_votes": 973, "percent_yes": 84.27543679342241, "percent_no": 15.724563206577585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.490412", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.824055", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for Earlimart students, modernize, construct, and improve classrooms and necessary student support facilities for school and community use, improve health, student safety and security, provide classroom technology infrastructure, and qualify the District for State matching grants, shall the Earlimart School District be authorized to issue up to $6.7 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, Citizens\u2019 Oversight, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4969, "fingerprint": "2016|201600520|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600520|TULARE", "content_hash": "6f73d990293a232c", "measure_id": "201600520", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding protected from Sacramento; maintain/improve essential city services including police, fire/9-1-1 emergency/ medical aide response, gang prevention programs/ neighborhood police patrols; maintain streets; reduce criminal street activity; attract/retain businesses/jobs; address homelessness; maintain youth/senior programs, and other services, shall the City of Visalia increase the sales tax by \u00bd- \u00a2, providing approximately $10,800,000 annually, until ended by voters; requiring audits, citizen\u2019s oversight and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25920, "no_votes": 13800, "total_votes": 39720, "percent_yes": 65.25679758308158, "percent_no": 34.74320241691842, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.488051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.822479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding protected from Sacramento; maintain/improve essential city services including police, fire/9-1-1 emergency/ medical aide response, gang prevention programs/ neighborhood police patrols; maintain streets; reduce criminal street activity; attract/retain businesses/jobs; address homelessness; maintain youth/senior programs, and other services, shall the City of Visalia increase the sales tax by \u00bd- \u00a2, providing approximately $10,800,000 annually, until ended by voters; requiring audits, citizen\u2019s oversight and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4974, "fingerprint": "2016|201600856|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600856|TULARE", "content_hash": "397ac4fdec6f90e5", "measure_id": "201600856", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/ upgrade high school facilities and prepare students for college/careers by repairing outdated classrooms, vocational/ career education facilities, science labs, restrooms, leaky roofs, upgrading school safety, fire alarms, heating/ ventilation/ air conditioning, ensuring safe drinking water/ student drop-off areas and repairing, constructing/ acquiring classrooms, facilities/sites/equipment, shall Hanford Joint Union High School District issue $33,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33, "no_votes": 46, "total_votes": 79, "percent_yes": 41.77215189873418, "percent_no": 58.22784810126582, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.489517", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.823466", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/ upgrade high school facilities and prepare students for college/careers by repairing outdated classrooms, vocational/ career education facilities, science labs, restrooms, leaky roofs, upgrading school safety, fire alarms, heating/ ventilation/ air conditioning, ensuring safe drinking water/ student drop-off areas and repairing, constructing/ acquiring classrooms, facilities/sites/equipment, shall Hanford Joint Union High School District issue $33,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4979, "fingerprint": "2016|201600145|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600145|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "cbf5187577d846c4", "measure_id": "201600145", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "May affordable rental housing be developed, constructed or acquired with public funds within the unicorporated area of the County of Tuolumne in an amount that does not exceed 60 units annually, with any units not used carrying over to the next year's allotment, and only after satisfying the public review process?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11959, "no_votes": 10793, "total_votes": 22752, "percent_yes": 52.56241209563994, "percent_no": 47.43758790436006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.490958", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.824452", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "May affordable rental housing be developed, constructed or acquired with public funds within the unicorporated area of the County of Tuolumne in an amount that does not exceed 60 units annually, with any units not used carrying over to the next year's allotment, and only after satisfying the public review process?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 4991, "fingerprint": "2016|201600529|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600529|VENTURA", "content_hash": "0fdf84d7371b6c3f", "measure_id": "201600529", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance initiated by residents extending the expiration date of the City Urban Restriction Boundary line from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2050, removes the exemption for schools and government facilities such that they must be built within the CURB, and requires an election to develop 20 acres of land beyond the CURB and the land must be fallow of agricultural use for 4 years be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2536, "no_votes": 1857, "total_votes": 4393, "percent_yes": 57.728203960846805, "percent_no": 42.271796039153195, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.494679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.826754", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance initiated by residents extending the expiration date of the City Urban Restriction Boundary line from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2050, removes the exemption for schools and government facilities such that they must be built within the CURB, and requires an election to develop 20 acres of land beyond the CURB and the land must be fallow of agricultural use for 4 years be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4980, "fingerprint": "2016|201600146|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600146|VENTURA", "content_hash": "8372e82fe74f39e7", "measure_id": "201600146", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To help preserve Ventura County\u2019s quality of life by: fixing potholes, repaving streets, repairing bridges; improving traffic flow and safety on 101 and 118; keeping senior, veteran, disabled, and student bus fares affordable; increasing bicycle and pedestrian safety; protecting waterways and beaches from polluted runoff and restoring watersheds; Shall Ventura County\u2019s sales tax be increased by one-half cent for thirty years, raising $70 million annually, with independent oversight and audits, and with all funds benefiting local residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 193449, "no_votes": 140600, "total_votes": 334049, "percent_yes": 57.91036644324635, "percent_no": 42.08963355675365, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.491266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.824645", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve Ventura County\u2019s quality of life by: fixing potholes, repaving streets, repairing bridges; improving traffic flow and safety on 101 and 118; keeping senior, veteran, disabled, and student bus fares affordable; increasing bicycle and pedestrian safety; protecting waterways and beaches from polluted runoff and restoring watersheds; Shall Ventura County\u2019s sales tax be increased by one-half cent for thirty years, raising $70 million annually, with independent oversight and audits, and with all funds benefiting local residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4981, "fingerprint": "2016|201600147|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600147|VENTURA", "content_hash": "4faa8d316abe76d3", "measure_id": "201600147", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the current ordinance requiring a vote of the people for changes to Open Space, Agricultural and Rural General Plan land use designations, goals and policies in the unincorporated area of the County be extended from 2020 through 2050, with specified modifications, such as permitting changes without a vote to allow for up to 12 acres of land to be used for food processing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 183394, "no_votes": 134217, "total_votes": 317611, "percent_yes": 57.741702900718174, "percent_no": 42.258297099281826, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.491641", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.824844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the current ordinance requiring a vote of the people for changes to Open Space, Agricultural and Rural General Plan land use designations, goals and policies in the unincorporated area of the County be extended from 2020 through 2050, with specified modifications, such as permitting changes without a vote to allow for up to 12 acres of land to be used for food processing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5003, "fingerprint": "2016|201600863|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600863|VENTURA", "content_hash": "45df1d8963a2ad5c", "measure_id": "201600863", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct and modernize additional classrooms and support facilities to reduce overcrowding, replace portable classrooms and older schools with new permanent facilities, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, improve student safety, reduce operating costs and qualify to receive State funds, shall Oxnard School District be authorized to issue up to $142,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24418, "no_votes": 10494, "total_votes": 34912, "percent_yes": 69.94156736938588, "percent_no": 30.05843263061412, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.498887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.829528", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct and modernize additional classrooms and support facilities to reduce overcrowding, replace portable classrooms and older schools with new permanent facilities, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, improve student safety, reduce operating costs and qualify to receive State funds, shall Oxnard School District be authorized to issue up to $142,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4992, "fingerprint": "2016|201600530|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600530|VENTURA", "content_hash": "df4742458ca54f15", "measure_id": "201600530", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Ordinance entitled \u201cMoorpark Save Open-space and Agricultural Resources \u2013 2050 initiative\u201d (\u201cMoorpark SOAR \u2013 2050\u201d) be adopted to extend with certain amendments the provisions of the 1999 voter-approved Moorpark SOAR from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2050 and continue to prohibit the City of Moorpark from permitting urban services or urbanized uses of land outside the current Moorpark City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) with certain exceptions during that extended period?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11241, "no_votes": 4081, "total_votes": 15322, "percent_yes": 73.36509594047774, "percent_no": 26.634904059522256, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.494952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.826942", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Ordinance entitled \u201cMoorpark Save Open-space and Agricultural Resources \u2013 2050 initiative\u201d (\u201cMoorpark SOAR \u2013 2050\u201d) be adopted to extend with certain amendments the provisions of the 1999 voter-approved Moorpark SOAR from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2050 and continue to prohibit the City of Moorpark from permitting urban services or urbanized uses of land outside the current Moorpark City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) with certain exceptions during that extended period?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4982, "fingerprint": "2016|201600148|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600148|VENTURA", "content_hash": "24f7e2a9be096719", "measure_id": "201600148", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the current ordinance requiring a vote of the people for changes to Open Space, Agricultural and Rural General Plan land use designations, goals and policies in the unincorporated area of the County be extended from 2020 through 2036, with specified modifications, such as permitting changes without a vote to allow for redesignation of land adjacent to certain school sites and up to 225 acres of land to be used for food processing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 149054, "no_votes": 172751, "total_votes": 321805, "percent_yes": 46.318111900063705, "percent_no": 53.681888099936295, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.491909", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.825035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the current ordinance requiring a vote of the people for changes to Open Space, Agricultural and Rural General Plan land use designations, goals and policies in the unincorporated area of the County be extended from 2020 through 2036, with specified modifications, such as permitting changes without a vote to allow for redesignation of land adjacent to certain school sites and up to 225 acres of land to be used for food processing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4995, "fingerprint": "2016|201600533|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600533|VENTURA", "content_hash": "3d2ef8cdf96909da", "measure_id": "201600533", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance placed on the ballot by the City Council of Fillmore extending the expiration date of the City Urban Restriction Boundary line from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2030 be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2234, "no_votes": 2138, "total_votes": 4372, "percent_yes": 51.09789569990851, "percent_no": 48.90210430009149, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.495756", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.827514", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance placed on the ballot by the City Council of Fillmore extending the expiration date of the City Urban Restriction Boundary line from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2030 be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4983, "fingerprint": "2016|201600521|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600521|VENTURA", "content_hash": "94ad4d98b8215595", "measure_id": "201600521", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance approving a permanent tax of not to exceed $30.00 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of space, and not to exceed $15.00 per square foot for the remaining space, used for the cultivation of marijuana, and providing for increases of the greater of CPI or $1.00 and $0.35, respectively, every five years, and that is expected to raise approximately $140,000 annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2760, "no_votes": 1815, "total_votes": 4575, "percent_yes": 60.32786885245902, "percent_no": 39.67213114754098, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.492186", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.825225", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance approving a permanent tax of not to exceed $30.00 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of space, and not to exceed $15.00 per square foot for the remaining space, used for the cultivation of marijuana, and providing for increases of the greater of CPI or $1.00 and $0.35, respectively, every five years, and that is expected to raise approximately $140,000 annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4984, "fingerprint": "2016|201600522|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600522|VENTURA", "content_hash": "c5e33773594a9ed1", "measure_id": "201600522", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance approving a permanent tax not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of all proceeds of marijuana sales in the City, which is anticipated to raise approximately $665,000 annually, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2939, "no_votes": 1617, "total_votes": 4556, "percent_yes": 64.50834064969271, "percent_no": 35.49165935030729, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.492456", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.825415", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance approving a permanent tax not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of all proceeds of marijuana sales in the City, which is anticipated to raise approximately $665,000 annually, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4990, "fingerprint": "2016|201600528|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600528|VENTURA", "content_hash": "3ee624e6873e657c", "measure_id": "201600528", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted approving an Initiative Ordinance Amending Chapter 3.0 of the Camarillo General Plan to Add Development Restrictions Within an Area Designated the Conejo Creek Voter Participation Area and to Amend and Extend the Life of the Development Restrictions Outside the Camarillo Urban Restriction Boundary (Curb)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22041, "no_votes": 8156, "total_votes": 30197, "percent_yes": 72.99069443984502, "percent_no": 27.009305560154985, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.494380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.826566", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted approving an Initiative Ordinance Amending Chapter 3.0 of the Camarillo General Plan to Add Development Restrictions Within an Area Designated the Conejo Creek Voter Participation Area and to Amend and Extend the Life of the Development Restrictions Outside the Camarillo Urban Restriction Boundary (Curb)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4996, "fingerprint": "2016|201600534|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600534|VENTURA", "content_hash": "dea5ad1ce9afd393", "measure_id": "201600534", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources (SOAR) Ordinance be extended, maintaining a City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB); prohibiting urban development outside of the CURB until December 31, 2030, unless approved by the voters; maintaining a City Buffer Boundary (CBB); and prohibiting changing the designation of land within the CBB that is designated \u2018Agriculture\u2019 in the Oxnard 2030 General Plan, unless approved by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36841, "no_votes": 15099, "total_votes": 51940, "percent_yes": 70.9299191374663, "percent_no": 29.0700808625337, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.496106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.827703", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources (SOAR) Ordinance be extended, maintaining a City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB); prohibiting urban development outside of the CURB until December 31, 2030, unless approved by the voters; maintaining a City Buffer Boundary (CBB); and prohibiting changing the designation of land within the CBB that is designated \u2018Agriculture\u2019 in the Oxnard 2030 General Plan, unless approved by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4997, "fingerprint": "2016|201600535|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600535|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e7a26d7090b7f391", "measure_id": "201600535", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources (SOAR) Ordinance be extended, maintaining a City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB); prohibiting urban development outside of the CURB until December 31, 2050, unless approved by the voters; maintaining a City Buffer Boundary (CBB); and prohibiting changing the designation of land within the CBB that is designated \u2018Agriculture\u2019 in the Oxnard 2030 General Plan, unless approved by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38584, "no_votes": 12788, "total_votes": 51372, "percent_yes": 75.1070622128786, "percent_no": 24.892937787121397, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.496410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.827899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources (SOAR) Ordinance be extended, maintaining a City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB); prohibiting urban development outside of the CURB until December 31, 2050, unless approved by the voters; maintaining a City Buffer Boundary (CBB); and prohibiting changing the designation of land within the CBB that is designated \u2018Agriculture\u2019 in the Oxnard 2030 General Plan, unless approved by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4985, "fingerprint": "2016|201600523|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600523|VENTURA", "content_hash": "208dd15c101bc87c", "measure_id": "201600523", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted repealing the City\u2019s wastewater rates adopted in January 2016 and returning to the rates previously in effect?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36440, "no_votes": 14040, "total_votes": 50480, "percent_yes": 72.18700475435817, "percent_no": 27.81299524564183, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.492832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.825603", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted repealing the City\u2019s wastewater rates adopted in January 2016 and returning to the rates previously in effect?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4988, "fingerprint": "2016|201600526|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600526|VENTURA", "content_hash": "4af11f4147b52bb6", "measure_id": "201600526", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed amendments to Sections 505, 703, and Article XI of the City Charter, to have the selection process for the City Council determined by Ordinance, have the selection of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor occur in even-number years following regular City Council elections, and eliminate the Ventura Unified School District\u2019s election process from the City Charter, thus making them subject to state law, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24190, "no_votes": 17451, "total_votes": 41641, "percent_yes": 58.09178453927619, "percent_no": 41.90821546072381, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.493794", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.826178", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed amendments to Sections 505, 703, and Article XI of the City Charter, to have the selection process for the City Council determined by Ordinance, have the selection of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor occur in even-number years following regular City Council elections, and eliminate the Ventura Unified School District\u2019s election process from the City Charter, thus making them subject to state law, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4986, "fingerprint": "2016|201600524|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600524|VENTURA", "content_hash": "68d12951a32e4367", "measure_id": "201600524", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help protect local water supplies, rivers, beaches from pollution; maintain City services, including: fire, paramedic, police emergency response; keep all fire stations open; repair streets; earthquake retrofit bridges; address homelessness; maintain after-school programs, services for seniors, veterans, youth; shall the City establish a \u00bd cent sales tax for 25 years, providing approximately $10,800,000 annually, require independent audits, citizens oversight, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28987, "no_votes": 20359, "total_votes": 49346, "percent_yes": 58.7423499371783, "percent_no": 41.2576500628217, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.493168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.825794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help protect local water supplies, rivers, beaches from pollution; maintain City services, including: fire, paramedic, police emergency response; keep all fire stations open; repair streets; earthquake retrofit bridges; address homelessness; maintain after-school programs, services for seniors, veterans, youth; shall the City establish a \u00bd cent sales tax for 25 years, providing approximately $10,800,000 annually, require independent audits, citizens oversight, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11314, "fingerprint": "2016|201600859|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600859|VENTURA", "content_hash": "0a755be7b2a51150", "measure_id": "201600859", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade elementary and middle school classrooms, restrooms and facilities; replace leaky roofs; provide air-conditioning and ventilation systems; upgrade/replace outdated electrical and deteriorating plumbing systems; construct new science labs and classrooms; and improve student access to computers/technology, shall Santa Paula Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue $39,600,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3110, "no_votes": 2026, "total_votes": 5136, "percent_yes": 60.55295950155764, "percent_no": 39.44704049844236, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.840578", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.497589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.828669", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade elementary and middle school classrooms, restrooms and facilities; replace leaky roofs; provide air-conditioning and ventilation systems; upgrade/replace outdated electrical and deteriorating plumbing systems; construct new science labs and classrooms; and improve student access to computers/technology, shall Santa Paula Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue $39,600,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4993, "fingerprint": "2016|201600531|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600531|VENTURA", "content_hash": "dc7cbc4462376a7c", "measure_id": "201600531", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance extending open-space, agriculture, and hillside land use changes by voter approval to 2050 be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33266, "no_votes": 12698, "total_votes": 45964, "percent_yes": 72.37403185101383, "percent_no": 27.625968148986175, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.495218", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.827138", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance extending open-space, agriculture, and hillside land use changes by voter approval to 2050 be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11313, "fingerprint": "2016|201600858|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600858|VENTURA", "content_hash": "39d0d0c215161856", "measure_id": "201600858", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair / replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize 50-year old classrooms, restrooms and buildings; shall the Cuyama Joint Unified School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24, "no_votes": 4, "total_votes": 28, "percent_yes": 85.71428571428571, "percent_no": 14.285714285714292, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.840382", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.497296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.828472", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair / replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and security improvements; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize 50-year old classrooms, restrooms and buildings; shall the Cuyama Joint Unified School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and NO money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4989, "fingerprint": "2016|201600527|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600527|VENTURA", "content_hash": "6db017f5cd2b8d49", "measure_id": "201600527", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed amendment to Section 507 of the City Charter, to include term-limits for City Councilmembers to require that after serving three full four-year terms, a City Councilmember is not eligible to run for the City Council or to be appointed to a vacancy unless a period of four years has elapsed since their last service on the City Council, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38307, "no_votes": 8470, "total_votes": 46777, "percent_yes": 81.89281056929688, "percent_no": 18.107189430703116, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.494075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.826375", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed amendment to Section 507 of the City Charter, to include term-limits for City Councilmembers to require that after serving three full four-year terms, a City Councilmember is not eligible to run for the City Council or to be appointed to a vacancy unless a period of four years has elapsed since their last service on the City Council, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5000, "fingerprint": "2016|201600860|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600860|VENTURA", "content_hash": "920ba3d0b771ce84", "measure_id": "201600860", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To aid in preserving and improving academic programs including reading, writing, music, art, science and math; fund computer technology; retain qualified teachers; and assist in maintaining career and technical training programs; shall Ventura Unified School District renew its existing $59 parcel tax for four years, so long as an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee is required, all funds are spent on neighborhood schools, and no money is used for administrative salaries or take by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39958, "no_votes": 13234, "total_votes": 53192, "percent_yes": 75.12031884493909, "percent_no": 24.879681155060908, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.497928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.828866", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To aid in preserving and improving academic programs including reading, writing, music, art, science and math; fund computer technology; retain qualified teachers; and assist in maintaining career and technical training programs; shall Ventura Unified School District renew its existing $59 parcel tax for four years, so long as an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee is required, all funds are spent on neighborhood schools, and no money is used for administrative salaries or take by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5002, "fingerprint": "2016|201600862|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600862|VENTURA", "content_hash": "4f94104d28ea1ab7", "measure_id": "201600862", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and campus security systems, repair/upgrade older classrooms and school facilities, including deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, and air conditioning systems, acquire, construct, and repair classrooms, sites, facilities, equipment and instructional technology to support student achievement in reading, math arts, humanities, science/technology, shall Oak Park Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight , audits, no money for administrator salaries, all money staying local, and without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4453, "no_votes": 2559, "total_votes": 7012, "percent_yes": 63.50541928123218, "percent_no": 36.49458071876782, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.498499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.829338", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and campus security systems, repair/upgrade older classrooms and school facilities, including deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical, and air conditioning systems, acquire, construct, and repair classrooms, sites, facilities, equipment and instructional technology to support student achievement in reading, math arts, humanities, science/technology, shall Oak Park Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight , audits, no money for administrator salaries, all money staying local, and without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4987, "fingerprint": "2016|201600525|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600525|VENTURA", "content_hash": "8ddeed02d439e569", "measure_id": "201600525", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a General Sales Tax Ordinance be adopted imposing a one cent (.01) transactions and use (sales) tax for a period of twenty (20) years to improve police and fire services with the remainder devoted to street repair, youth programs and the provision of other city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5145, "no_votes": 3670, "total_votes": 8815, "percent_yes": 58.36642087351106, "percent_no": 41.63357912648894, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.493441", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.825990", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a General Sales Tax Ordinance be adopted imposing a one cent (.01) transactions and use (sales) tax for a period of twenty (20) years to improve police and fire services with the remainder devoted to street repair, youth programs and the provision of other city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4994, "fingerprint": "2016|201600532|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600532|VENTURA", "content_hash": "1932271a32f68f68", "measure_id": "201600532", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance initiated by residents that expands the City Urban Restriction Boundary to include 53.75 acres in the southwest portion of the City, extends the expiration of the City Urban Restriction Boundary from 2020 to December 31, 2050, extends the expiration of the 81-Acre Initiative from 2025 to December 31, 2050, and makes other minor textual revisions to the CURB be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4481, "no_votes": 3622, "total_votes": 8103, "percent_yes": 55.30050598543749, "percent_no": 44.69949401456251, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.495482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.827325", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance initiated by residents that expands the City Urban Restriction Boundary to include 53.75 acres in the southwest portion of the City, extends the expiration of the City Urban Restriction Boundary from 2020 to December 31, 2050, extends the expiration of the 81-Acre Initiative from 2025 to December 31, 2050, and makes other minor textual revisions to the CURB be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5001, "fingerprint": "2016|201600861|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600861|VENTURA", "content_hash": "b5ab1889d4b97350", "measure_id": "201600861", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade older classrooms and school facilities, including leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing, electrical, heating/air conditioning systems, upgrade electrical wiring, fire alarms/emergency communication systems, improve vocational education facilities, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, sites, facilities, equipment, qualify for State matching funds, shall Fillmore Unified School District issue $35 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local to benefit Fillmore Unified students and schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4376, "no_votes": 1628, "total_votes": 6004, "percent_yes": 72.88474350433046, "percent_no": 27.11525649566954, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.498197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.829144", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade older classrooms and school facilities, including leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing, electrical, heating/air conditioning systems, upgrade electrical wiring, fire alarms/emergency communication systems, improve vocational education facilities, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, sites, facilities, equipment, qualify for State matching funds, shall Fillmore Unified School District issue $35 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local to benefit Fillmore Unified students and schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4999, "fingerprint": "2016|201600537|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600537|VENTURA", "content_hash": "a4ff72bfac5751a4", "measure_id": "201600537", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance extending the City Urban Restriction Boundary Ordinance, and extending the ordinance requiring voter approval of any General Plan designation change from the Existing Parks, Golf Courses, and Open Space category, from December 31, 2030 to December 31, 2050 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43934, "no_votes": 13679, "total_votes": 57613, "percent_yes": 76.25709475292035, "percent_no": 23.742905247079648, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.497017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.828283", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance extending the City Urban Restriction Boundary Ordinance, and extending the ordinance requiring voter approval of any General Plan designation change from the Existing Parks, Golf Courses, and Open Space category, from December 31, 2030 to December 31, 2050 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5004, "fingerprint": "2016|201600864|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600864|VENTURA", "content_hash": "786f59588ec17a1a", "measure_id": "201600864", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize and upgrade outdated classrooms, science labs, restrooms and school facilities; repair and replace leaky roofs; upgrade or renovate inadequate electrical and deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; improve student access to computers/modern technology; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements, shall Simi Valley Unified School District issue $239,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, include an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36644, "no_votes": 18845, "total_votes": 55489, "percent_yes": 66.03831390005226, "percent_no": 33.96168609994774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.499164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.829726", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize and upgrade outdated classrooms, science labs, restrooms and school facilities; repair and replace leaky roofs; upgrade or renovate inadequate electrical and deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; improve student access to computers/modern technology; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements, shall Simi Valley Unified School District issue $239,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, include an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, NO money for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5005, "fingerprint": "2016|201600865|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600865|VENTURA", "content_hash": "c2b044ab83ecc33c", "measure_id": "201600865", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Members of the Simi Valley Unified School District Board of Trustees be limited to two (2) consecutive terms of office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42696, "no_votes": 11006, "total_votes": 53702, "percent_yes": 79.50541879259619, "percent_no": 20.49458120740381, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.499466", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.829922", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Members of the Simi Valley Unified School District Board of Trustees be limited to two (2) consecutive terms of office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 4998, "fingerprint": "2016|201600536|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600536|VENTURA", "content_hash": "db62a53295ef2971", "measure_id": "201600536", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance extending the City Urban Restriction Boundary Ordinance from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2050 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33316, "no_votes": 15725, "total_votes": 49041, "percent_yes": 67.93499316898107, "percent_no": 32.065006831018934, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.496679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.828095", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance extending the City Urban Restriction Boundary Ordinance from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2050 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5008, "fingerprint": "2016|201600540|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600540|YOLO", "content_hash": "93dbdc407fa94ae7", "measure_id": "201600540", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 16-014 amending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designation for the Nishi property from Agriculture to University-Related Research Park, as set forth in the Resolution and establishing the Baseline Project Features for development of the Nishi Project be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11009, "no_votes": 11702, "total_votes": 22711, "percent_yes": 48.47430760424464, "percent_no": 51.52569239575536, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.500304", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.830492", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 16-014 amending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designation for the Nishi property from Agriculture to University-Related Research Park, as set forth in the Resolution and establishing the Baseline Project Features for development of the Nishi Project be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11315, "fingerprint": "2016|201600867|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600867|YOLO", "content_hash": "c7c8ad723f726562", "measure_id": "201600867", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing, constructing and/or renovating classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; with funding that cannot be taken by the state; shall the Pierce Joint Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 286, "no_votes": 167, "total_votes": 453, "percent_yes": 63.13465783664459, "percent_no": 36.86534216335541, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.843165", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.501504", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.831246", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by modernizing, constructing and/or renovating classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; with funding that cannot be taken by the state; shall the Pierce Joint Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5006, "fingerprint": "2016|201600538|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600538|YOLO", "content_hash": "14a2010cd27d868f", "measure_id": "201600538", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2468 be adopted to amend, effective August 1, 2016, Article 15.05 of the Davis Municipal Code to increase the City of Davis's Transient Occupancy Tax, imposed on occupants of short-term rentals such as hotel rooms, from 10% to 12%, and apply TOT to total rent paid by a guest for the short-term rental, including online travel companies, which is anticipated to raise $240,000 annually and will continue until repealed by City Council or city voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13936, "no_votes": 7892, "total_votes": 21828, "percent_yes": 63.84460326186549, "percent_no": 36.15539673813451, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.499769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.830110", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2468 be adopted to amend, effective August 1, 2016, Article 15.05 of the Davis Municipal Code to increase the City of Davis's Transient Occupancy Tax, imposed on occupants of short-term rentals such as hotel rooms, from 10% to 12%, and apply TOT to total rent paid by a guest for the short-term rental, including online travel companies, which is anticipated to raise $240,000 annually and will continue until repealed by City Council or city voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5007, "fingerprint": "2016|201600539|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600539|YOLO", "content_hash": "4a020d873a9a9b76", "measure_id": "201600539", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2469 be adopted to add Article 19.04.100 to the Davis Municipal Code to establish a business license tax on non medical (recreational) marijuana businesses within the city of no more than 10% of annual gross receipts of the business, which is estimated to raise $200,000 annually if recreational marijuana sales are legalized and the City amends zoning to authorize marijuana businesses within City limits, and which will continue until repealed by City Council or city voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17449, "no_votes": 4660, "total_votes": 22109, "percent_yes": 78.92261070152426, "percent_no": 21.077389298475737, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.500039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.830298", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2469 be adopted to add Article 19.04.100 to the Davis Municipal Code to establish a business license tax on non medical (recreational) marijuana businesses within the city of no more than 10% of annual gross receipts of the business, which is estimated to raise $200,000 annually if recreational marijuana sales are legalized and the City amends zoning to authorize marijuana businesses within City limits, and which will continue until repealed by City Council or city voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5013, "fingerprint": "2016|201600868|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600868|YOLO", "content_hash": "94aef109cfd8570d", "measure_id": "201600868", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize, renovate and/or construct classrooms, restrooms, cafeterias, and other school facilities including Winters High School; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Winters Joint Unified School District issue $17,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2232, "no_votes": 821, "total_votes": 3053, "percent_yes": 73.10841794955782, "percent_no": 26.89158205044218, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.502065", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.831631", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize, renovate and/or construct classrooms, restrooms, cafeterias, and other school facilities including Winters High School; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Winters Joint Unified School District issue $17,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5009, "fingerprint": "2016|201600541|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600541|YOLO", "content_hash": "e39fd6bedf18fd6f", "measure_id": "201600541", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund City services and initiatives such as repairing roads, building and maintaining bicycle/pedestrian trails, reducing homelessness and its community impacts, improving educational and career opportunities for youth, and enhancing internet access and the use of smart technologies, shall the City of West Sacramento enact a 1/4 percent transactions and use tax (sales tax) raising approximately $3.3 million annually on an ongoing basis for general governmental purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11103, "no_votes": 5785, "total_votes": 16888, "percent_yes": 65.7449076267172, "percent_no": 34.25509237328281, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.500571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.830681", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund City services and initiatives such as repairing roads, building and maintaining bicycle/pedestrian trails, reducing homelessness and its community impacts, improving educational and career opportunities for youth, and enhancing internet access and the use of smart technologies, shall the City of West Sacramento enact a 1/4 percent transactions and use tax (sales tax) raising approximately $3.3 million annually on an ongoing basis for general governmental purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5010, "fingerprint": "2016|201600542|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600542|YOLO", "content_hash": "49e239a908739aa3", "measure_id": "201600542", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordnance No. 1599 which would authorize the City of Woodland to continue to collect an existing one-half cent sales tax for a period of twelve years, and would not increase taxes, for general city services including, but not limited to, street maintenance, parks and facility capital projects, and public safety, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13376, "no_votes": 7212, "total_votes": 20588, "percent_yes": 64.96988537011852, "percent_no": 35.03011462988148, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.500912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.830869", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordnance No. 1599 which would authorize the City of Woodland to continue to collect an existing one-half cent sales tax for a period of twelve years, and would not increase taxes, for general city services including, but not limited to, street maintenance, parks and facility capital projects, and public safety, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5012, "fingerprint": "2016|201600866|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600866|YOLO", "content_hash": "b839d2fcd625ed76", "measure_id": "201600866", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide outstanding academics in math, science, reading, writing, instructional technology and programs in athletics, arts and music; provide high quality teachers; limit class sizes; and support student health and safety; shall the Davis Joint Unified School District replace its expiring parcel taxes with a single eight-year parcel tax of $620/year, raising approximately $9.5 million/year, adjusted for inflation; with senior and disability exemptions; with citizens oversight; for the exclusive use of Davis schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23527, "no_votes": 9191, "total_votes": 32718, "percent_yes": 71.90842961061189, "percent_no": 28.09157038938811, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.501787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.831441", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide outstanding academics in math, science, reading, writing, instructional technology and programs in athletics, arts and music; provide high quality teachers; limit class sizes; and support student health and safety; shall the Davis Joint Unified School District replace its expiring parcel taxes with a single eight-year parcel tax of $620/year, raising approximately $9.5 million/year, adjusted for inflation; with senior and disability exemptions; with citizens oversight; for the exclusive use of Davis schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5011, "fingerprint": "2016|201600869|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600869|YOLO", "content_hash": "8520cb62bb59764d", "measure_id": "201600869", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16057, "no_votes": 8869, "total_votes": 24926, "percent_yes": 64.41867929070048, "percent_no": 35.58132070929952, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.501204", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.831057", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5014, "fingerprint": "2016|201600149|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600149|YUBA", "content_hash": "855e34b1b6edc761", "measure_id": "201600149", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance that would increase the number of medical marijuana plants that may be cultivated on parcels of land greater than one acre and allow for cultivation of medical marijuana outdoors and within residences be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5514, "no_votes": 9087, "total_votes": 14601, "percent_yes": 37.76453667557016, "percent_no": 62.23546332442984, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.502331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.831831", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance that would increase the number of medical marijuana plants that may be cultivated on parcels of land greater than one acre and allow for cultivation of medical marijuana outdoors and within residences be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11316, "fingerprint": "2016|201600870|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600870|YUBA", "content_hash": "a654aecfe631e2e3", "measure_id": "201600870", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/improve local high schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing classrooms/ leaky roofs, updating facilities for career/technical education jobs in science, technology, engineering/math, ensuring safe drinking water/fire safety, replacing deteriorating sewer/gas lines, repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring education facilities, shall Nevada Joint Union High School District issue $47,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, require independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/ pensions, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 204, "no_votes": 96, "total_votes": 300, "percent_yes": 68.0, "percent_no": 32.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.844946", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.504071", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.832986", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/improve local high schools, retain/attract quality teachers by repairing classrooms/ leaky roofs, updating facilities for career/technical education jobs in science, technology, engineering/math, ensuring safe drinking water/fire safety, replacing deteriorating sewer/gas lines, repairing, constructing, equipping/acquiring education facilities, shall Nevada Joint Union High School District issue $47,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, require independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/ pensions, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5015, "fingerprint": "2016|201600150|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600150|YUBA", "content_hash": "5ca1f977564ae808", "measure_id": "201600150", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance that authorizes licensed medical marijuana dispensaries that will provide medical marijuana to qualified patients and primary caregivers in a retail setting be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6495, "no_votes": 8030, "total_votes": 14525, "percent_yes": 44.71600688468158, "percent_no": 55.28399311531842, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.502656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.832024", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance that authorizes licensed medical marijuana dispensaries that will provide medical marijuana to qualified patients and primary caregivers in a retail setting be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5017, "fingerprint": "2016|201600543|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600543|YUBA", "content_hash": "ca71bf5ccd0ff63f", "measure_id": "201600543", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Marysville enact a 1% sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for general municipal purposes, such as fire safety, police protection and emergency response services, traffic safety, streets and sidewalks repair, park improvements and maintenance, reducing debt and rebuilding financial reserves, with the following restrictions? This tax shall expire after ten years, on October 31, 2026. Annually, the City shall publish a report of how much tax revenue was received and how that money was used.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1213, "no_votes": 1005, "total_votes": 2218, "percent_yes": 54.68890892696122, "percent_no": 45.31109107303878, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.503258", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.832406", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Marysville enact a 1% sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for general municipal purposes, such as fire safety, police protection and emergency response services, traffic safety, streets and sidewalks repair, park improvements and maintenance, reducing debt and rebuilding financial reserves, with the following restrictions? This tax shall expire after ten years, on October 31, 2026. Annually, the City shall publish a report of how much tax revenue was received and how that money was used.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5020, "fingerprint": "2016|201600871|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600871|YUBA", "content_hash": "f9a800eeaa27ad58", "measure_id": "201600871", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To design and construct a new middle school to serve the Plumas Lake community in order to provide adequate facilities specifically designed to accommodate middle school curriculum for all current and future residents, including modern classrooms, science, math and comupter labs as well as necesary student support facilities, shall Plumas Lake Elementary School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, no money for administrators' salaries, with all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1582, "no_votes": 809, "total_votes": 2391, "percent_yes": 66.16478460895023, "percent_no": 33.83521539104977, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.504372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.833180", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To design and construct a new middle school to serve the Plumas Lake community in order to provide adequate facilities specifically designed to accommodate middle school curriculum for all current and future residents, including modern classrooms, science, math and comupter labs as well as necesary student support facilities, shall Plumas Lake Elementary School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, no money for administrators' salaries, with all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5016, "fingerprint": "2016|201600151|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600151|YUBA", "content_hash": "88ebf0f04ba2c1a5", "measure_id": "201600151", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance that would allow for commercial medical cannabis activity in Yuba County and establish regulations to generally regulate the cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, and transportation of medical cannabis within the County be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9871, "no_votes": 11960, "total_votes": 21831, "percent_yes": 45.215519215794046, "percent_no": 54.784480784205954, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.502964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.832216", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance that would allow for commercial medical cannabis activity in Yuba County and establish regulations to generally regulate the cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, and transportation of medical cannabis within the County be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5018, "fingerprint": "2016|201600544|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600544|YUBA", "content_hash": "86ca093dbcab6e49", "measure_id": "201600544", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the Marysville Municipal Code to add a \u201cCannabis Business Tax\u201d effective July 1, 2016 on marijuana businesses to help fund general city services at a rate not to exceed 15% of gross receipts for the licensed sale of medical and non-medical marijuana, and not to exceed $25 per square foot on the cultivation of cannabis by licensed growers, estimated to generate $650,000 annually, with no termination date and annual adjustments by a consumer price index, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2027, "no_votes": 1182, "total_votes": 3209, "percent_yes": 63.166095356808974, "percent_no": 36.833904643191026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.503534", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.832600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the Marysville Municipal Code to add a \u201cCannabis Business Tax\u201d effective July 1, 2016 on marijuana businesses to help fund general city services at a rate not to exceed 15% of gross receipts for the licensed sale of medical and non-medical marijuana, and not to exceed $25 per square foot on the cultivation of cannabis by licensed growers, estimated to generate $650,000 annually, with no termination date and annual adjustments by a consumer price index, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5019, "fingerprint": "2016|201600872|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2016|201600872|YUBA", "content_hash": "8520cb62bb59764d", "measure_id": "201600872", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2016, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12306, "no_votes": 9285, "total_votes": 21591, "percent_yes": 56.99597054328193, "percent_no": 43.00402945671807, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2016-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.503804", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.832797", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue repairing, renovating, constructing and equipping classrooms/facilities at the campuses of Yuba and Woodland Colleges including nursing, healthcare, science, technology, engineering, fire and police training classrooms, shall $33,565,000 of Yuba Community College District Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and all funds used locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12393, "fingerprint": "2015|201500095|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500095|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5115586f2ae9fb8e", "measure_id": "201500095", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Without increasing the current tax rate, to support academic excellence, retain qualified and experienced teachers, and prepare students for 21st century college and careers with strong reading, writing, math and science education, shall San Ramon Valley Unified School District renew its expiring education tax at $144 per parcel for 9 years, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrative salaries, an available exemption for persons 65 and older, and all funds spent to support local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19618, "no_votes": 6548, "total_votes": 26166, "percent_yes": 74.97515860276694, "percent_no": 25.02484139723306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080640", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080640", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12365, "fingerprint": "2015|201500067|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500067|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "300c4fa042fd483c", "measure_id": "201500067", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain Hercules' financial stability; enhance fiscal accountability; prevent cuts to police services/crime prevention programs, street/pothole repair, youth/senior programs, and other essential City services; and maintain the number of police officers patrolling neighborhood streets and the local Hercules Police Department, shall the City of Hercules continue its existing, voter-approved one-half cent sales tax, with citizens' oversight, audits, and funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, and without increasing the current tax rate?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2021, "no_votes": 660, "total_votes": 2681, "percent_yes": 75.3823200298396, "percent_no": 24.617679970160395, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075860", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075860", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075860", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12366, "fingerprint": "2015|201500068|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500068|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "a8b14f09f94521be", "measure_id": "201500068", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "CONTRA COSTA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain Hercules' financial stability; enhance fiscal accountability; prevent cuts to police services/crime prevention programs, street/pothole repair, youth/senior programs, and other essential City services; and maintain the number of police officers patrolling neighborhood streets and the local Hercules Police Department, shall the City of Hercules continue its existing, voter-approved utility users' tax, with no tax increase, including low-income exemptions, independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, and funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1929, "no_votes": 742, "total_votes": 2671, "percent_yes": 72.22014226881318, "percent_no": 27.779857731186823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076027", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076027", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076027", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CONTRA COSTA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12303, "fingerprint": "2015|201500005|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500005|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "957ef6c5c2884225", "measure_id": "201500005", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall James McCarthy be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the Audubon Hills CSD?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120, "no_votes": 52, "total_votes": 172, "percent_yes": 69.76744186046511, "percent_no": 30.232558139534888, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-31", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065134", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065134", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065134", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12304, "fingerprint": "2015|201500006|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500006|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "b74321d7f00672b7", "measure_id": "201500006", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure 2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Robert Verzello be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the Audubon Hills CSD?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 118, "no_votes": 54, "total_votes": 172, "percent_yes": 68.6046511627907, "percent_no": 31.395348837209298, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-31", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065313", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065313", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065313", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure 2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12306, "fingerprint": "2015|201500008|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500008|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "04e4aa547dbaad33", "measure_id": "201500008", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an annual special tax in an amount of $250.00 on each parcel of real property be levied within Many Oaks Lane Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2015/2016, to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services and drainage facility maintenance services, to replace the current benefit assessment?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62, "no_votes": 34, "total_votes": 96, "percent_yes": 64.58333333333334, "percent_no": 35.41666666666666, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065685", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065685", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065685", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12405, "fingerprint": "2015|201500107|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500107|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "8b06143931d8f7f9", "measure_id": "201500107", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To keep classroom computers, technology and software up-todate, strengthen the computer network connecting classrooms to each other and the Internet, and provide instructional technology to all Placerville elementary and middle school students that will benefit them in high school and beyond, shall the Placerville Union School District issue $3,200,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits with all funds audited annually, monitored by an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no funds used for administrator salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1414, "no_votes": 1121, "total_votes": 2535, "percent_yes": 55.77909270216963, "percent_no": 44.22090729783037, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082621", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082621", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12315, "fingerprint": "2015|201500017|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500017|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "2eccd70030427da8", "measure_id": "201500017", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Consumnes River Community Services District increase the current annual special tax to fund maintaining, upgrading, and improving District roads by $100 per parcel per year such that the total tax will increase from $150 to $250 per parcel per year?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57, "no_votes": 40, "total_votes": 97, "percent_yes": 58.76288659793815, "percent_no": 41.23711340206185, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067310", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067310", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12316, "fingerprint": "2015|201500018|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500018|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "97981f1ea1ede5c1", "measure_id": "201500018", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "EL DORADO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Should the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors re-zone the approximately 100 acres of the former executive golf course in El Dorado Hills from its current land use designation as \"open space recreation\" to a designation that allows residential housing and commercial development on the property?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 811, "no_votes": 8236, "total_votes": 9047, "percent_yes": 8.964297557201283, "percent_no": 91.03570244279872, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067480", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067480", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067480", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EL DORADO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12411, "fingerprint": "2015|201500113|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500113|FRESNO", "content_hash": "abe5b056c4ec87f3", "measure_id": "201500113", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall John H. Lorona be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 191, "no_votes": 106, "total_votes": 297, "percent_yes": 64.3097643097643, "percent_no": 35.690235690235696, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083701", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083701", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12399, "fingerprint": "2015|201500101|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500101|FRESNO", "content_hash": "9b986c3370e31700", "measure_id": "201500101", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Maria Gomez be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 388, "no_votes": 118, "total_votes": 506, "percent_yes": 76.6798418972332, "percent_no": 23.320158102766797, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081634", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081634", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12400, "fingerprint": "2015|201500102|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500102|FRESNO", "content_hash": "641a21838ff238d4", "measure_id": "201500102", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure 2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Luis Ramirez be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 372, "no_votes": 131, "total_votes": 503, "percent_yes": 73.95626242544732, "percent_no": 26.04373757455268, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081796", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081796", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure 2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12412, "fingerprint": "2015|201500114|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500114|FRESNO", "content_hash": "5261831a494a9298", "measure_id": "201500114", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure 3", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Roger Orosco be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 510, "no_votes": 337, "total_votes": 847, "percent_yes": 60.2125147579693, "percent_no": 39.7874852420307, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083863", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083863", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083863", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure 3", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12401, "fingerprint": "2015|201500103|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500103|FRESNO", "content_hash": "2d94e6414afe5785", "measure_id": "201500103", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure 4", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Richard Gonzalez be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 386, "no_votes": 118, "total_votes": 504, "percent_yes": 76.5873015873016, "percent_no": 23.412698412698404, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081958", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081958", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081958", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure 4", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12413, "fingerprint": "2015|201500115|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500115|FRESNO", "content_hash": "690d81204aa36834", "measure_id": "201500115", "measure_letter": "5", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "FRESNO Measure 5", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Gilbert A. Lopez be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 259, "no_votes": 196, "total_votes": 455, "percent_yes": 56.92307692307692, "percent_no": 43.07692307692308, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084025", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084025", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084025", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FRESNO Measure 5", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12362, "fingerprint": "2015|201500064|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500064|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "12ac8a75303eb596", "measure_id": "201500064", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "HUMBOLDT Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Transit Occupancy Tax, TOT, charged to persons who stay at a hotel within the Ferndale City limits be increased by 2% from the present 8% rate to 10%?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 254, "no_votes": 81, "total_votes": 335, "percent_yes": 75.82089552238806, "percent_no": 24.179104477611943, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075366", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075366", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075366", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "HUMBOLDT Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12402, "fingerprint": "2015|201500104|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500104|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "a432c8cbcf331634", "measure_id": "201500104", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "IMPERIAL Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Herber Elementary School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates to construct a gymnasium for school and community use that meets health, safety, and handicapped accessibility requirements, classrooms to support the physical education curriculum and other educational needs, restrooms, changing rooms and storage areas with no money used for teacher or administrative salaries and with oversight from an independent citizens oversight committee?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 432, "no_votes": 93, "total_votes": 525, "percent_yes": 82.28571428571428, "percent_no": 17.714285714285722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082123", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082123", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "IMPERIAL Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12360, "fingerprint": "2015|201500062|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500062|KERN", "content_hash": "3a76a7463d1c50e2", "measure_id": "201500062", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain the City of Delano's current level of essential general services, including, but not limited to, police and fire services, street improvements, parks and recreations, and other General Fund services, shall the City of Delano continue collecting its existing voter-approved one percent (1%) sales tax for an additional ten (10) years, with all proceeds to be used for essential City general services, with no increase in tax rate?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 861, "no_votes": 1103, "total_votes": 1964, "percent_yes": 43.83910386965377, "percent_no": 56.16089613034623, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075033", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075033", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12331, "fingerprint": "2015|201500033|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500033|KERN", "content_hash": "282f930169ffd695", "measure_id": "201500033", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "KERN Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Stallion Springs Community Services District levy an annual special tax beginning with fiscal year 2017 of up to $50 per parcel for the sole purpose of funding police protection services, all as provided in District resolution 2015-08?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 500, "no_votes": 224, "total_votes": 724, "percent_yes": 69.06077348066299, "percent_no": 30.939226519337012, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070071", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070071", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070071", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "KERN Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12307, "fingerprint": "2015|201500009|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500009|LASSEN", "content_hash": "609de0cb34e6b70b", "measure_id": "201500009", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LASSEN Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the order adopted on January 26, 2015 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Lassen ordering the formation of a District in the territory described, known as the Southern Cascades Community Services District, be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233, "no_votes": 94, "total_votes": 327, "percent_yes": 71.25382262996942, "percent_no": 28.74617737003058, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Incorporation/Formation/Annexation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065860", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065860", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065860", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LASSEN Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12309, "fingerprint": "2015|201500011|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500011|LASSEN", "content_hash": "5c3b1aa3a14b1aec", "measure_id": "201500011", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LASSEN Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted to assess a special tax of $65 per annum per parcel regardless of the size for up to two parcels owned by each unique landowner regardless of which county the parcels are located, the special tax will be authorized only if the Southern Cascades Community Services District is formed and is collected in the same manner as taxes on real property, commencing in the fiscal year after which the voters have authorized the special tax, with the revenue to be used for local ambulance, emergency medical response and training and any lawful purpose of the Southern Cascades Community Services District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 228, "no_votes": 98, "total_votes": 326, "percent_yes": 69.93865030674846, "percent_no": 30.061349693251543, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Emergency Medical/Paramedic", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066214", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066214", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LASSEN Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12340, "fingerprint": "2015|201500042|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500042|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "998d506625c319f5", "measure_id": "201500042", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: 1) change the City's primary and general election dates to June and November of even-numbered years beginning in 2020 so that City elections are held on the same dates as Federal and State elections; 2) provide that, in 2015 and 2017 only, candidates be elected for a term of 5/12 years to transition to the new election dates; 3) adjust vacancy election schedules and allow temporary appointments to fill vacant offices until an election is held; 4) enable initiative and referendum elections to be scheduled at either the next City or next State election; and 5) allow initiative proponents to withdraw their measure prior to scheduling an election?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 139292, "no_votes": 41081, "total_votes": 180373, "percent_yes": 77.22441828876828, "percent_no": 22.775581711231723, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071618", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071618", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12341, "fingerprint": "2015|201500043|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500043|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2b6b77c7b4c96ade", "measure_id": "201500043", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure 2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: 1) change the LAUSD Board of Education\u2019s primary and general election dates to June and November of even numbered years beginning in 2020 so that LAUSD elections are held on the same dates as Federal and State elections; 2) provide that, in 2015 and 2017 only, candidates be elected for a term of 5 \u00bd to transition to the new election dates; and 3) adjust vacancy election schedules and allow temporary appointments to fill vacant offices until an election held?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 160601, "no_votes": 49380, "total_votes": 209981, "percent_yes": 76.48358661021712, "percent_no": 23.516413389782883, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071785", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071785", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071785", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure 2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12339, "fingerprint": "2015|201500041|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500041|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5cb47c027af91eff", "measure_id": "201500041", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that prohibits land use for certain treatments of oil or gas wells that are designed to enhance production or recovery, any new oil and gas wells, and reactivation of idle wells?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 802, "no_votes": 1061, "total_votes": 1863, "percent_yes": 43.04884594739667, "percent_no": 56.95115405260333, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Environment: Regulation/Mitigation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071452", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071452", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071452", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12337, "fingerprint": "2015|201500039|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500039|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ae48beb125b3bf46", "measure_id": "201500039", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance adopting term limits for Cudahy City Council Members be adopted?\nThese term limits provide that no person shall serve more than eight years, or two four-year terms as a member of the Cudahy City Council, with any portion of a term, whether by election or appointment, counting as a full term.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 672, "no_votes": 133, "total_votes": 805, "percent_yes": 83.47826086956522, "percent_no": 16.52173913043478, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071095", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071095", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12336, "fingerprint": "2015|201500038|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500038|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "63653da43c41ed48", "measure_id": "201500038", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To assist in the recovery of expenses for providing general city services, including police, library and park services, shall the City of Cerritos adopt an ordinance increasing the existing Transient Occupancy Tax (which is a hotel bed tax) from a rate of six percent (6%) to twelve percent (12%), which is a rate closer to the average for other Southern California cities?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5255, "no_votes": 2209, "total_votes": 7464, "percent_yes": 70.40460878885317, "percent_no": 29.595391211146833, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070927", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070927", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070927", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12335, "fingerprint": "2015|201500037|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500037|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8941be7079c16c30", "measure_id": "201500037", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance 14-1544 be adopted extending the 2% Utility Users' Tax on electricity & gas, and adding water, cable, telephone & cellular utilities to continue essential services, including police, park enforcement teams, gang intervention, youth recreation programs, graffiti removal, Meals on Wheels, senior programs & stroke recovery, sidewalk & street repair, city special events, staffing parks, and addressing blight caused by loss of redevelopment revenue, while exempting senior and low-income households?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4257, "no_votes": 4683, "total_votes": 8940, "percent_yes": 47.61744966442953, "percent_no": 52.38255033557047, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070759", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070759", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070759", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12333, "fingerprint": "2015|201500035|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500035|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7f1f9d813df498fd", "measure_id": "201500035", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance amending the Azusa Municipal Code be YES adopted to increase the rate of the Transient Occupancy (Room) Tax from 7.5% to 10%, and to apply the Tax to all rent charged by hotel operators, including online travel companies, for the transient occupancy of any hotel room, to help maintain general City services such as police and fire protection, street operations and maintenance, and library, parks and recreation services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 944, "no_votes": 728, "total_votes": 1672, "percent_yes": 56.45933014354066, "percent_no": 43.54066985645934, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070421", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070421", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12343, "fingerprint": "2015|201500045|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500045|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "64acc3e58b4329b7", "measure_id": "201500045", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Redondo Beach phase-out power generation from a 50-acre Site currently occupied by the Redondo Beach Generating Plant and establish new land use and development standards for the Site by amending the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, Harbor/Civic Center Specific Plan, Coastal Zoning, Zoning, and City Charter; with the new land use allowing 600 residential units; 85,000 square feet of commercial development; 250 hotel rooms and requiring 10 acres of public open space?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6072, "no_votes": 6684, "total_votes": 12756, "percent_yes": 47.60112888052681, "percent_no": 52.39887111947319, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072163", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072163", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12385, "fingerprint": "2015|201500087|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500087|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8d48b6062a495c39", "measure_id": "201500087", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 2279 be approved to amend the city\u2019s municipal code to eliminate illegal qualification requirements, require professional recruitment for the city manager, require that hiring and retention of the city manager be based on skills and experience, eliminate requirement that interim city manager be selected only from department heads, eliminate most restrictions on removal of the city manager, and provide that any appointment which violates state or local law is null and void?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4692, "no_votes": 1713, "total_votes": 6405, "percent_yes": 73.25526932084308, "percent_no": 26.744730679156916, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079272", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079272", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079272", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12346, "fingerprint": "2015|201500048|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500048|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0d29f19cb353156b", "measure_id": "201500048", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall City Charter Article IV, Section 3 be amended to require the city council to establish by ordinance the method of the council compensation?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4008, "no_votes": 13136, "total_votes": 17144, "percent_yes": 23.37844143723752, "percent_no": 76.62155856276249, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-04-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072669", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072669", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072669", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12334, "fingerprint": "2015|201500036|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500036|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f741c4298e55f60b", "measure_id": "201500036", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: revise Councilmember candidate residency requirements to 30 days, limit Councilmember compensation for sitting on multiple City bodies, require written expense reimbursement policies, limit indemnification of elected officials, establish a citizen planning commission, changing recall procedures, eliminate the assistant chief administrative officer position, prohibiting conflicts of interest or financial interests in City contracts, and prohibit franchises of indefinite duration, all consistent with state law?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1390, "no_votes": 336, "total_votes": 1726, "percent_yes": 80.53302433371958, "percent_no": 19.46697566628042, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070588", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070588", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070588", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12347, "fingerprint": "2015|201500049|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500049|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b8c43f4378cb69d7", "measure_id": "201500049", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City institute by-district elections for city council, by amending the Charter Article IV, Section 1 and adopting an ordinance requiring the city to prepare a district plan subject to voter approval?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6508, "no_votes": 10711, "total_votes": 17219, "percent_yes": 37.79545850513967, "percent_no": 62.20454149486033, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-04-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072836", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072836", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12403, "fingerprint": "2015|201500105|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500105|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "139850bab58adc97", "measure_id": "201500105", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect the quality of education in our local schools, fund core programs in math, science, reading, technology and the arts, attract/retain highly qualified teachers, counselors, and technology specialists, maintain smaller class sizes, enhance student achievement and prepare our students for success in college and careers, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District continue for twelve years the existing $98 annual school parcel tax without raising the current rate, with an exemption for seniors, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3095, "no_votes": 959, "total_votes": 4054, "percent_yes": 76.34435125801677, "percent_no": 23.655648741983228, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082290", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082290", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082290", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12387, "fingerprint": "2015|201500089|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500089|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1ea59a497b9bc82c", "measure_id": "201500089", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue a tradition of community support for the San Marino Unified School District\u2019s students and educational programs and avoid a $4 million budget shortfall, support outstanding classroom teachers and a solid academic curriculum, maintain advanced placement and honors classes, arts and athletic programs, technology, and preserve smaller class sizes, shall the District continue to levy a $865 annual education parcel tax, as adjusted, for six (6) years that will offer an exemption to senior citizens?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2131, "no_votes": 687, "total_votes": 2818, "percent_yes": 75.62100780695529, "percent_no": 24.37899219304471, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079619", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079619", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079619", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12348, "fingerprint": "2015|201500050|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500050|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ff7323caa0a443d6", "measure_id": "201500050", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall City Charter Article IV, Section 1 and Article XII, Section 1 be amended and Article XII Section 3 be added to require the Board of Education to establish the method of electing the members of the Board of Education and, if the Board of Education establishes trustee areas as the method for electing its members, require that the Board arrange said trustee areas pursuant to the California Education Code?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5557, "no_votes": 10349, "total_votes": 15906, "percent_yes": 34.93650194895008, "percent_no": 65.06349805104992, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-04-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073008", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073008", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073008", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12367, "fingerprint": "2015|201500069|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500069|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9854487d5bcf0953", "measure_id": "201500069", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would increase the Hermosa Beach transient occupancy tax (hotel bed tax) from 10 percent to 12 percent of room revenue?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3027, "no_votes": 537, "total_votes": 3564, "percent_yes": 84.93265993265993, "percent_no": 15.06734006734007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076195", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076195", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076195", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12383, "fingerprint": "2015|201500085|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500085|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "099ca3ca9a29d794", "measure_id": "201500085", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To keep the South Pasadena Public Library open every day and to help update its technology, shall an ordinance be adopted extending the Library Special Tax for 8 years; setting the rate for homeowners at $32-$64/year depending on residential square footage; for non-residential property owners at $32-$128/year based on lot size and for multi-family property owners at $16/unit; and adding an annual Los Angeles Consumer Price Index adjustment?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2933, "no_votes": 653, "total_votes": 3586, "percent_yes": 81.79029559397658, "percent_no": 18.20970440602342, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Libraries", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078942", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078942", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12415, "fingerprint": "2015|201500117|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500117|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7bd9a5d5354ec123", "measure_id": "201500117", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade facilities to maintain excellent education/college readiness by providing facilities/technology for advanced math, science, engineering, upgrading outdated classrooms, science labs, libraries, computer systems, improving school safety/security, and repairing, constructing/acquiring classrooms, facilities, equipment, shall Walnut Valley Unified School District issue $208 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds used for neighborhood schools in/around Diamond Bar and Walnut?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2454, "no_votes": 2140, "total_votes": 4594, "percent_yes": 53.41750108837614, "percent_no": 46.58249891162386, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084369", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084369", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084369", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12356, "fingerprint": "2015|201500058|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500058|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0985977cf2927e58", "measure_id": "201500058", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 2015-325 be adopted to remove the expiration date of November 8, 2030 in Ordinance No. 2005-225, and thereby make permanent the requirement to protect and preserve the existing areas of open space in Calabasas unless in a future election 2/3 of the voters choose to redesignate the open space for another purpose?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3506, "no_votes": 436, "total_votes": 3942, "percent_yes": 88.93962455606291, "percent_no": 11.06037544393709, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074350", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074350", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074350", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12350, "fingerprint": "2015|201500052|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500052|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6d96af24563faf98", "measure_id": "201500052", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Chapter 3.7 of Article III of the Vernon City Charter be amended to clarify that the candidate(s) with the next subsequent highest number of votes in an election with multiple seats, shall be elected to fill the unexpired term or terms after all full terms of office are filled by candidate(s) who have received a higher number of votes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29, "no_votes": 4, "total_votes": 33, "percent_yes": 87.87878787878788, "percent_no": 12.121212121212125, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-04-14", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073341", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073341", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12349, "fingerprint": "2015|201500051|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500051|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "20fefb19e884b0a7", "measure_id": "201500051", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Glendale Municipal Code be amended to increase the rate of the Transient Occupancy Tax (a hotel bed tax paid when overnight visitors rent a room) by 2% to preserve and enhance funding for essential public services and maintain public areas and support quality of life activities?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9934, "no_votes": 6717, "total_votes": 16651, "percent_yes": 59.660080475647106, "percent_no": 40.339919524352894, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-04-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073175", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073175", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073175", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12338, "fingerprint": "2015|201500040|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500040|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3fed309dbf5ee243", "measure_id": "201500040", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall E&B Corporation\u2019s 34-well oil and gas drilling/ production project at the City\u2019s 555 Sixth Street maintenance yard be approved by 1) amending the General Plan and Municipal Code to exempt the project from the City\u2019s oil drilling ban and repeal the restriction on City\u2019s use of project royalties, 2) awarding a pipeline franchise to transport oil/gas underground, 3) approving a 34-year development agreement, and 4) determining that project financial benefits outweigh its unavoidable environmental impacts?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1538, "no_votes": 5968, "total_votes": 7506, "percent_yes": 20.49027444710898, "percent_no": 79.50972555289101, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071267", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071267", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12351, "fingerprint": "2015|201500053|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500053|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "941a988ad3102852", "measure_id": "201500053", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Chapter 7.4 of Article VII of the Vernon City Charter be amended to allow the City Council to fix the duties, tenure and compensation of officers by any means it deems appropriate?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 33, "percent_yes": 81.81818181818183, "percent_no": 18.181818181818173, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-04-14", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073509", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073509", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073509", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12342, "fingerprint": "2015|201500044|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500044|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "42e4269b81a6ce5e", "measure_id": "201500044", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve youth after-school educational programs; 9-1-1 emergency response; neighborhood/school Sheriff patrols and Sheriff\u2019s station; drug/gang prevention; street repairs; seniors programs; parks and general services, shall Ordinance No. 1052 be adopted to update the City\u2019s utility users tax and increase the rate by two and a half percent; with all funds used only in Paramount, subject to independent financial audits, and requiring equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 700, "no_votes": 230, "total_votes": 930, "percent_yes": 75.26881720430107, "percent_no": 24.731182795698928, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071963", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.071963", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12359, "fingerprint": "2015|201500061|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500061|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f5a0b24cdb9aabb8", "measure_id": "201500061", "measure_letter": "PS", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure PS", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Claremont City Council adopt the ordinance levying a new special parcel tax of $286.00 per parcel per year commencing on July 1, 2016 and ending on June 30, 2056, for the purpose of funding the site acquisition, design, construction and furnishing of a new public safety facility?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4134, "no_votes": 1372, "total_votes": 5506, "percent_yes": 75.08172902288412, "percent_no": 24.91827097711588, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074864", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074864", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074864", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure PS", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12397, "fingerprint": "2015|201500099|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500099|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ac7827d5da54fd54", "measure_id": "201500099", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To make schools modern, safe and inspiring; shall the Compton Unified School District issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates to reconstruct local schools and facilities, including research libraries, modern classrooms and science labs, media and performing arts centers, technology centers and athletic complexes; improve safety, security, roofing, plumbing, heating, electrical, and other systems; with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2762, "no_votes": 2175, "total_votes": 4937, "percent_yes": 55.94490581324691, "percent_no": 44.05509418675309, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081294", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081294", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12379, "fingerprint": "2015|201500081|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500081|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fbf40a507f82e1f0", "measure_id": "201500081", "measure_letter": "SA", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure SA", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to continue a Special Public Safety Tax for Paramedic Services, Fire Protection and Prevention and Police Protection in the City of San Marino?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2195, "no_votes": 776, "total_votes": 2971, "percent_yes": 73.8808481992595, "percent_no": 26.119151800740497, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078270", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078270", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure SA", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12380, "fingerprint": "2015|201500082|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500082|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0863e5fa838d9ca9", "measure_id": "201500082", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to update and extend for a period of ten years the Utility User Tax and reduce the maximum rate of the tax from 6% to 5%?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2110, "no_votes": 829, "total_votes": 2939, "percent_yes": 71.7931269139163, "percent_no": 28.206873086083704, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078434", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078434", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078434", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12369, "fingerprint": "2015|201500071|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500071|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b34c53957db8ef46", "measure_id": "201500071", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "LOS ANGELES Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted approving the Civic Center-Northeast Specific Plan for property located at the northwest corner of Cross Creek and Civic Center Way that regulates development and limits uses to allow construction of a commercial shopping center up to 38,425 square feet, proposed to include a grocery store, retail and recreational/educational uses?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1479, "no_votes": 1971, "total_votes": 3450, "percent_yes": 42.869565217391305, "percent_no": 57.130434782608695, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076533", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076533", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076533", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "LOS ANGELES Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12394, "fingerprint": "2015|201500096|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500096|MADERA", "content_hash": "9faa5a75dcff80ad", "measure_id": "201500096", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MADERA Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Carla J Neal be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 435, "no_votes": 56, "total_votes": 491, "percent_yes": 88.59470468431772, "percent_no": 11.405295315682281, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-09-01", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080805", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080805", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MADERA Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12395, "fingerprint": "2015|201500097|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500097|MADERA", "content_hash": "7a4f544bd055b39b", "measure_id": "201500097", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MADERA Measure 2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Kathleen Ctumpton be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 452, "no_votes": 90, "total_votes": 542, "percent_yes": 83.39483394833948, "percent_no": 16.605166051660518, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-09-01", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080968", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080968", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080968", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MADERA Measure 2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12396, "fingerprint": "2015|201500098|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500098|MADERA", "content_hash": "eeb86abd587f5cde", "measure_id": "201500098", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MADERA Measure 4", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall John Moseley be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 378, "no_votes": 118, "total_votes": 496, "percent_yes": 76.20967741935483, "percent_no": 23.790322580645167, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-09-01", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081130", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081130", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MADERA Measure 4", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12409, "fingerprint": "2015|201500111|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500111|MARIN", "content_hash": "f676d20b7d167f86", "measure_id": "201500111", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade and repair schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall San Rafael City Elementary School District update, renovate/construct science, technology, engineering, math/core academic classrooms, replace aging electrical, plumbing/HVAC systems, make classrooms accessible for students with disabilities, repair, construct, acquire/equip classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $108,225,000 of bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, benefits or pensions, and all funds used for San Rafael schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5584, "no_votes": 2722, "total_votes": 8306, "percent_yes": 67.22850951119672, "percent_no": 32.77149048880328, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083343", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083343", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083343", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12390, "fingerprint": "2015|201500092|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500092|MARIN", "content_hash": "4761e4f7bbd7fc00", "measure_id": "201500092", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain small class sizes, provide competitive salaries, offer instructional programs that support diverse learners, and fund school operations essential to these goals, should Nicasio School District renew and extend its expiring parcel tax for ten years commencing July 1, 2015, increase the rate by $99 to a total of $573.46, and apply a 3% annual increase for each subsequent year, with an exemption for resident property owners age 65 and older?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134, "no_votes": 55, "total_votes": 189, "percent_yes": 70.8994708994709, "percent_no": 29.1005291005291, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080140", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080140", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12410, "fingerprint": "2015|201500112|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500112|MARIN", "content_hash": "e2782bc2ab80ba9d", "measure_id": "201500112", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade and repair schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall San Rafael City High School District update, renovate/construct science, technology, engineering, math/core academic classrooms, replace aging electrical, plumbing/HVAC systems, make classrooms accessible for students with disabilities, repair, construct, acquire/equip classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $160,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, benefits or pensions, and all funds used for local high schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9261, "no_votes": 4327, "total_votes": 13588, "percent_yes": 68.15572564027083, "percent_no": 31.84427435972917, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083523", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083523", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12373, "fingerprint": "2015|201500075|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500075|MARIN", "content_hash": "9b4682702ecb1448", "measure_id": "201500075", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue funding, that cannot be taken by the State, for general city services including, but not limited to, protecting neighborhood police patrols, 9-1-1 emergency response, crime prevention/gang intervention services; fixing potholes, streets, parks; attracting/retaining qualified police officers; supporting the local economy/increasing jobs; and providing youth, senior, recreation programs, shall the City of Novato extend the existing voter approved sales tax, reducing the rate from \u00bd cent to \u00bc cent, requiring oversight and audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8121, "no_votes": 2897, "total_votes": 11018, "percent_yes": 73.70666182610273, "percent_no": 26.29333817389727, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077235", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077235", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077235", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12374, "fingerprint": "2015|201500076|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500076|MARIN", "content_hash": "171eb04bf0f9ee9d", "measure_id": "201500076", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the San Anselmo General Plan to do the following: prohibit the use of Memorial Park as a flood detention basin; prevent any non-recreational uses that adversely affect or reduce Memorial Park\u2019s current recreational amenities; and require voter approval before the park can be sold or transferred by the Town?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2425, "no_votes": 1824, "total_votes": 4249, "percent_yes": 57.07225229465757, "percent_no": 42.92774770534243, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077411", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077411", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077411", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12375, "fingerprint": "2015|201500077|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500077|MARIN", "content_hash": "0182e7875b0704ba", "measure_id": "201500077", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Town\u2019s General Plan to affirm continued use of Memorial Park as primarily a recreational facility and to permit accessory use of Memorial Park for flood control by way of a detention basin only if a majority of voters approves a specific plan detailing development of the park for flood control following environmental review?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2414, "no_votes": 1803, "total_votes": 4217, "percent_yes": 57.24448660184965, "percent_no": 42.75551339815035, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077587", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077587", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12382, "fingerprint": "2015|201500084|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500084|MARIN", "content_hash": "b7199e9097e6ecaa", "measure_id": "201500084", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To bring Robin Sweeny Park, Southview Park, Dunphy Park and the MLK site to current health/safety standards; repair unsafe children\u2019s playground equipment, upgrade safety lighting, pathways and play courts; add needed restrooms; restore wetlands/natural areas, shall the City of Sausalito enter into an agreement with the Sausalito Financing Authority and permit revenue from the MLK site to be used as revenue financing, with no increase in taxes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1474, "no_votes": 847, "total_votes": 2321, "percent_yes": 63.507109004739334, "percent_no": 36.492890995260666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": "Facilities: Parks & Recreation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078766", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078766", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078766", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12318, "fingerprint": "2015|201500020|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500020|MARIN", "content_hash": "37ae8f51c5f6bfec", "measure_id": "201500020", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the four fiscal years 2016-2017 through 2019-2020 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for fire protection and emergency services previously approved by the voters in November, 2011.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1168, "no_votes": 266, "total_votes": 1434, "percent_yes": 81.45048814504882, "percent_no": 18.549511854951177, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": "Revenues", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067814", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067814", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067814", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12319, "fingerprint": "2015|201500021|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500021|MARIN", "content_hash": "6b25d86bf9bb024a", "measure_id": "201500021", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MARIN Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide park, open space and street landscape maintenance, shall an ordinance be adopted to replace the existing special tax of $189.56 per parcel with a special tax of $189.56 per unit on each parcel within the Marinwood Community Services District, with an annual cost of living adjustment, and to increase the District appropriations limit by the amount of the proceeds received from the special tax?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1090, "no_votes": 35, "total_votes": 1125, "percent_yes": 96.88888888888889, "percent_no": 3.1111111111111143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Maintenance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067984", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067984", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067984", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MARIN Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12406, "fingerprint": "2015|201500108|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500108|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "14ac2b2dce2a6b4b", "measure_id": "201500108", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MENDOCINO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To modernize and improve Potter Valley schools, upgrade outdated electrical infrastructure, create classrooms with improved climate control and the capacity to use today's instructional technology, and make other basic repairs, shall the Potter Valley Community Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $3,100,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee and annual audits to ensure funds are ONLY spent improving LOCAL classrooms and facilities, and NOT for administrator salaries or any other purpose?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 338, "no_votes": 159, "total_votes": 497, "percent_yes": 68.00804828973843, "percent_no": 31.991951710261574, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082787", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082787", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MENDOCINO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12308, "fingerprint": "2015|201500010|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500010|MODOC", "content_hash": "b34b853bf1e84a20", "measure_id": "201500010", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MODOC Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the order adopted on January 26, 2015 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Lassen ordering the formation of a District in the territory described, known as the Southern Cascades Community Services District, be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 188, "no_votes": 104, "total_votes": 292, "percent_yes": 64.38356164383562, "percent_no": 35.61643835616438, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Incorporation/Formation/Annexation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066039", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066039", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MODOC Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12310, "fingerprint": "2015|201500012|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500012|MODOC", "content_hash": "4fa3687ce39ea583", "measure_id": "201500012", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MODOC Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a measure be adopted to assess a special tax of $65 per annum per parcel regardless of the size for up to two parcels owned by each unique landowner regardless of which county the parcels are located, the special tax will be authorized only if the Southern Cascades Community Services District is formed and is collected in the same manner as taxes on real property, commencing in the fiscal year after which the voters have authorized the special tax, with the revenue to be used for local ambulance, emergency medical response and training and any lawful purpose of the Southern Cascades Community Services District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 182, "no_votes": 112, "total_votes": 294, "percent_yes": 61.904761904761905, "percent_no": 38.095238095238095, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Emergency Medical/Paramedic", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066398", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066398", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MODOC Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12355, "fingerprint": "2015|201500057|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500057|MONO", "content_hash": "308f734f6520d360", "measure_id": "201500057", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONO Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance to require voter approval to alter transient rental zoning in certain residential neighborhoods be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 910, "no_votes": 411, "total_votes": 1321, "percent_yes": 68.88720666161998, "percent_no": 31.112793338380015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-10-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074184", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074184", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074184", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONO Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12363, "fingerprint": "2015|201500065|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500065|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d29039bbc990eaf0", "measure_id": "201500065", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve the health, safety and welfare of Greenfield, and maintain/protect general City services, including 9-1-1 emergency response; building protection; neighborhood police patrols; gang/sex offender enforcement; animal control; street maintenance/pothole repair; park maintenance; and other essential services, shall the City of Greenfield continue a voter approved 1 cent transaction and use tax, subject to annual audits and public review?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 681, "no_votes": 296, "total_votes": 977, "percent_yes": 69.70317297850563, "percent_no": 30.296827021494366, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075530", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075530", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12364, "fingerprint": "2015|201500066|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500066|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b225dc9feafb897c", "measure_id": "201500066", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "MONTEREY Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To enhance the health, safety and welfare of Greenfield, and provide greater general City services, such as strengthened public safety; increased youth recreation programs; re-establishment of code enforcement services; and other essential services, shall the City of Greenfield enact a voter approved 0.75 cent transaction and use tax, subject to annual audits and public review?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 588, "no_votes": 383, "total_votes": 971, "percent_yes": 60.55612770339855, "percent_no": 39.44387229660145, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075695", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075695", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MONTEREY Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12352, "fingerprint": "2015|201500054|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500054|ORANGE", "content_hash": "660bd1c0370d97d7", "measure_id": "201500054", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "ORANGE Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the Buena Park General Plan to prohibit, without a vote of the electorate, construction of any residential, commercial, or industrial building or structure on private or public property designated as open space on the general plan land use map?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3480, "no_votes": 4301, "total_votes": 7781, "percent_yes": 44.72432849248168, "percent_no": 55.27567150751832, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-19", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073678", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073678", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORANGE Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12300, "fingerprint": "2015|201500002|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500002|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "784b8138d10b2a4b", "measure_id": "201500002", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLUMAS Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Michael Yost be recalled (removed) from office of Director of the Indian Valley CSD?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 402, "no_votes": 230, "total_votes": 632, "percent_yes": 63.60759493670886, "percent_no": 36.39240506329114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-24", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064595", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064595", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLUMAS Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12301, "fingerprint": "2015|201500003|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500003|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "91a2a574b7a6e888", "measure_id": "201500003", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLUMAS Measure 2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Jane Braxton Little be recaleld (removed) from office of Director of the Indian Valley CSD?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 404, "no_votes": 226, "total_votes": 630, "percent_yes": 64.12698412698413, "percent_no": 35.87301587301587, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-24", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064778", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064778", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064778", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLUMAS Measure 2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12302, "fingerprint": "2015|201500004|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500004|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "8af96f039b31a4c2", "measure_id": "201500004", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLUMAS Measure 3", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Bradley Smith be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the Indian Valley CSD?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 395, "no_votes": 240, "total_votes": 635, "percent_yes": 62.20472440944882, "percent_no": 37.79527559055118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-24", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064956", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064956", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064956", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLUMAS Measure 3", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12299, "fingerprint": "2015|201500001|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500001|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "ca815aab188e7eb9", "measure_id": "201500001", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PLUMAS Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Whitehawk Ranch Community Service District (CSD) adopt a tax increase of $200.00 per parcel, commencing 2015, to provide for the maintenance, repairs, operations and upgrades including but not limited to the CSD's properties and services including; swimming pool, tennis courts, community center, gazebo, exercise/maintenance buildings, bocce ball pond area, equestrian center, related parking, burn area, road leading to burn area, RV storage area and approximately one hundred acres of hiking trails and open space requiring defensible space maintenance?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66, "no_votes": 16, "total_votes": 82, "percent_yes": 80.48780487804879, "percent_no": 19.51219512195121, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Parks & Recreation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-01-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064363", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064363", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.064363", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PLUMAS Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12353, "fingerprint": "2015|201500055|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500055|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "53fe88fdf0f0f6ee", "measure_id": "201500055", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "RIVERSIDE Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Should \u201cAn Initiative Measure to Rescind the City of Riverside\u2019s Ban on Storefront and Mobile Marijuana Dispensaries\u201d be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9779, "no_votes": 14647, "total_votes": 24426, "percent_yes": 40.03520838450831, "percent_no": 59.96479161549169, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-06-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073846", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073846", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.073846", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "RIVERSIDE Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12317, "fingerprint": "2015|201500019|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500019|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "887609b151bfa539", "measure_id": "201500019", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure CC", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Helendale Community Services District pursue the exercies of legal authority to provide local police protection services at a cost that will be paid by customers of, and/or property owners in, the District in amounts and in a manner to be determined later in accordance with applicable legal requirements?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 198, "no_votes": 676, "total_votes": 874, "percent_yes": 22.65446224256293, "percent_no": 77.34553775743707, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067649", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067649", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067649", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure CC", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12345, "fingerprint": "2015|201500047|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500047|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "358b603fd3a709ab", "measure_id": "201500047", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 12.75 acres of vacant land from General Commercial to Residential-RD12, generally located on the west side of Central Avenue, north of Francis Avenue, for a maximum of 113 single-family dwelling units?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1717, "no_votes": 1365, "total_votes": 3082, "percent_yes": 55.71057754704737, "percent_no": 44.28942245295263, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-24", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072501", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072501", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12388, "fingerprint": "2015|201500090|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500090|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "cbab406f0a1f09b4", "measure_id": "201500090", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide for the acquisition, construction, installation, improvement, expansion and the equipping of school facilities, including the acquisition of land, for the benefit of the area and land included within School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Mountain View School District, shall Mountain View School District issue $171 million in bonds of School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Mountain View School District at legal rates, with independent oversight and annual audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 18, "percent_yes": 88.88888888888889, "percent_no": 11.111111111111114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-04-14", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079795", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079795", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12354, "fingerprint": "2015|201500056|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500056|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c9d65a1e464e5660", "measure_id": "201500056", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Medical Marijuana Dispensary Authorization and Regulation Initiative Measure be enacted to allow the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries in the jurisdictional boundaries of the Town of Yucca Valley at a rate of one dispensary per every 10,000 residents, and attendant provisions regulating such operations?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1620, "no_votes": 2103, "total_votes": 3723, "percent_yes": 43.51329572925061, "percent_no": 56.48670427074939, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-06-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074017", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074017", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12314, "fingerprint": "2015|201500016|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500016|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "997264230b581c00", "measure_id": "201500016", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Z", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall County Service Area 70, P-6 (El Mirage) levy an annual Special Tax of $12 per parcel beginning in FY 2016/17 with an annual inflationary increase of 3.75% each year thereafter for the provision of recreation and park services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18, "no_votes": 53, "total_votes": 71, "percent_yes": 25.352112676056336, "percent_no": 74.64788732394366, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Facilities: Parks & Recreation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-09-01", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067123", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.067123", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNARDINO Measure Z", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12324, "fingerprint": "2015|201500026|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500026|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "46fbe801a2f16305", "measure_id": "201500026", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To finance the construction, development, acquisition, and preservation of housing affordable to low- and middle-income households through programs that will prioritize vulnerable populations such as San Francisco\u2019s working families, veterans, seniors, disabled persons; to assist in the acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of affordable rental apartment buildings to prevent the eviction of long-term residents; to repair and reconstruct dilapidated public housing; to fund a middle-income rental program; and to provide for homeownership down payment assistance opportunities for educators and middle-income households; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $310 million in general obligation bonds, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 148513, "no_votes": 51486, "total_votes": 199999, "percent_yes": 74.25687128435642, "percent_no": 25.74312871564358, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068866", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068866", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068866", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12325, "fingerprint": "2015|201500027|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500027|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0cd094d564e9c082", "measure_id": "201500027", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend the Charter to allow parents who are both City employees to each take the maximum amount of paid parental leave for which they qualify for the birth, adoption or foster parenting of the same child, if both parents are City employees; and to provide each parent the opportunity to keep up to 40 hours of sick leave at the end of paid parental leave?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 133718, "no_votes": 62864, "total_votes": 196582, "percent_yes": 68.0214872165305, "percent_no": 31.978512783469498, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069055", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069055", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12326, "fingerprint": "2015|201500028|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500028|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "24457c850f470c66", "measure_id": "201500028", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City regulate expenditure lobbyists by requiring them to register with the Ethics Commission, pay a $500 registration fee, and file monthly disclosures regarding their lobbying activities?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 144053, "no_votes": 48443, "total_votes": 192496, "percent_yes": 74.83428227080043, "percent_no": 25.16571772919957, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069225", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069225", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069225", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12327, "fingerprint": "2015|201500029|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500029|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d299f55c2e390fc4", "measure_id": "201500029", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City increase the height limit for 10 of the 28 acres of the Mission Rock site from one story to height limits ranging from 40 to 240 feet and make it City policy to encourage the development on the Mission Rock site provided that it includes eight acres of parks and open space and housing of which at least 33% is affordable for low- and middle-income households?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 146716, "no_votes": 51434, "total_votes": 198150, "percent_yes": 74.04289679535705, "percent_no": 25.957103204642948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069391", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069391", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069391", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12320, "fingerprint": "2015|201500022|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500022|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "885f068efa67dd29", "measure_id": "201500022", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City broadcast all City meetings live on the Internet; allow members of the public to submit electronically during the meeting live, written, video, or audio comments from any location and require those comments be played; require pre-recorded video testimony to be played during a meeting; and allow the public or board, commission, or committee members to request that discussion of a particular agenda item begin at a specific time?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65044, "no_votes": 129213, "total_votes": 194257, "percent_yes": 33.48347807286224, "percent_no": 66.51652192713776, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068154", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068154", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068154", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12321, "fingerprint": "2015|201500023|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500023|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a01d14748c9373d7", "measure_id": "201500023", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City limit short-term rentals of a housing unit to 75 days per year regardless of whether the rental is hosted or unhosted; require owners to provide proof that they authorize the unit as a short-term rental; require residents who offer short-term rentals to submit quarterly reports on the number of days they live in the unit and the number of days the unit is rented; prohibit short-term rentals of in-law units; allow interested parties to sue hosting platforms; and make it a misdemeanor for a hosting platform to unlawfully list a unit as a short-term rental?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 88945, "no_votes": 111348, "total_votes": 200293, "percent_yes": 44.40744309586456, "percent_no": 55.59255690413544, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068324", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068324", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068324", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12322, "fingerprint": "2015|201500024|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500024|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "8ed37e189545454b", "measure_id": "201500024", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City define \u2018renewable, greenhouse-gas free electricity\u2019 to mean electricity derived exclusively from certain renewable resources located within or adjacent to the California border or electricity derived from Hetch Hetchy, except for electricity from other types of resources such as rooftop solar and other large hydroelectric facilities; require CleanPowerSF to inform customers and potential customers of the planned percentage of \u2018renewable, greenhouse-gas free electricity\u2019 to be provided; and prohibit CleanPowerSF from marketing, advertising or making any public statement that its electricity is \u2018clean\u2019 or \u2018green\u2019 unless the electricity is \u2018renewable, greenhouse gas-free electricity\u2019 as defined in this measure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41780, "no_votes": 144852, "total_votes": 186632, "percent_yes": 22.386300312915257, "percent_no": 77.61369968708475, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Environment", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068494", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068494", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12328, "fingerprint": "2015|201500030|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500030|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ff7f64837e3da37b", "measure_id": "201500030", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City use the State definition of \u2018eligible renewable energy resources\u2019 when referring to terms such as \u2018clean energy,\u2019 \u2018green energy,\u2019 and \u2018renewable Greenhouse Gas-free Energy\u2019; and shall CleanPowerSF be urged to inform customers and potential customers of the planned percentage of types of renewable energy to be supplied in each communication; and shall it be City policy for CleanPowerSF to use electricity generated within California and San Francisco when possible?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 148213, "no_votes": 36495, "total_votes": 184708, "percent_yes": 80.24178703683653, "percent_no": 19.758212963163473, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": "Environment", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069558", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069558", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069558", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12323, "fingerprint": "2015|201500025|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500025|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "778b7465e60bb8d5", "measure_id": "201500025", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City suspend the issuance of permits on certain types of housing and business development projects in the Mission District for at least 18 months; and develop a Neighborhood Stabilization Plan for the Mission District by January 31, 2017?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83415, "no_votes": 111543, "total_votes": 194958, "percent_yes": 42.78613855291909, "percent_no": 57.21386144708091, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Growth Cap/Boundary", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068681", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068681", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.068681", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12329, "fingerprint": "2015|201500031|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500031|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d4a233a16f7e6c3d", "measure_id": "201500031", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City establish a Legacy Business Historic Preservation Fund, which would give grants to Legacy Businesses and to building owners who lease space to those businesses for terms of at least 10 years; and expand the definition of a Legacy Business to include those that have operated in San Francisco for more than 20 years, are at risk of displacement and meet the other requirements of the Registry?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108907, "no_votes": 82268, "total_votes": 191175, "percent_yes": 56.96717667058977, "percent_no": 43.03282332941023, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069737", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069737", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12330, "fingerprint": "2015|201500032|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500032|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "50ea1bfd6aff7452", "measure_id": "201500032", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City expand the allowable uses of surplus property to include building affordable housing for a range of households from those who are homeless or those with very low income to those with incomes up to 120% of the area median income; and, for projects of more than 200 units, make some housing available for households earning up to 150% or more of the area median income?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143918, "no_votes": 50041, "total_votes": 193959, "percent_yes": 74.20021757175486, "percent_no": 25.799782428245138, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Housing: Affordable", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069904", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.069904", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN FRANCISCO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12386, "fingerprint": "2015|201500088|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500088|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "65c36160c489181c", "measure_id": "201500088", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a new Active Adult Residential Allotment Program in the City\u2019s Municipal Code; exempting such program from the City\u2019s Growth Management Ordinance; and allocating 600 Active Adult Residential Allotments to property located at the southeast corner of Corral Hollow and Valpico Roads?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4535, "no_votes": 1262, "total_votes": 5797, "percent_yes": 78.23011902708298, "percent_no": 21.769880972917022, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Housing", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-12-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079447", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079447", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079447", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOAQUIN Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12305, "fingerprint": "2015|201500007|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500007|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "5fc9a8a1e34819d8", "measure_id": "201500007", "measure_letter": "A-15", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure A-15", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2015/2016, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within Road Improvement Zone \u2013 Leonard Place of County Service Area No. 21, to provide road improvements within said Zone, with the special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding $1,815 per parcel having a separate County Assessor\u2019s Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8, "no_votes": 4, "total_votes": 12, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065488", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.065488", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN LUIS OBISPO Measure A-15", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12392, "fingerprint": "2015|201500094|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500094|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a54474a020798eae", "measure_id": "201500094", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support academic excellence and maintain high-quality educational programs, including math, reading and writing, and hands-on science instruction; attract and retain qualified and experienced teachers; and support art, music, libraries and a well-rounded education; shall San Carlos (Elementary) School District renew existing local school parcel taxes and increase them by $58 per year for six years, exempting senior citizens, with annual public reports and all funds spent to support local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4656, "no_votes": 2163, "total_votes": 6819, "percent_yes": 68.27980642322922, "percent_no": 31.720193576770782, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080473", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080473", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080473", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12313, "fingerprint": "2015|201500015|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500015|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d27346bac290dbff", "measure_id": "201500015", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Merimont territory consisting of seventy (70) parcels located along Merimont Circle, Marbella Lane, and Alden Court in San Bruno, California, be transferred from the South San Francisco Unified School District to the San Bruno Park School District and San Mateo Union High School District, such that by operation of law, persons residing within that territory would become residents of the San Bruno Park School District and San Mateo Union High School District, and be subject to those districts\u2019 parcel taxes, effective July 1, 2016?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 60, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Incorporation/Formation/Annexation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-08-25", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066931", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066931", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066931", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12376, "fingerprint": "2015|201500078|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500078|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "bb053521871d20c0", "measure_id": "201500078", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the position of City Treasurer of the City of San Bruno be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2725, "no_votes": 2652, "total_votes": 5377, "percent_yes": 50.67881718430351, "percent_no": 49.32118281569649, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077765", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077765", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077765", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12381, "fingerprint": "2015|201500083|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500083|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c2fe42ecf56ddb17", "measure_id": "201500083", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue locally controlled funding to maintain services and improve infrastructure, including: police patrols and gang prevention; street, sidewalk, and pothole repair; 9-1-1 response times and emergency medical services, fire prevention; senior, teen, and children's programs; parks, paths and playfields, library hours; and other city services; shall San Mateo extend the existing voter-approved quarter-cent sales tax for 30 years without increasing current tax rates with citizen oversight of how proceeds are spent?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11037, "no_votes": 4750, "total_votes": 15787, "percent_yes": 69.91195287261671, "percent_no": 30.08804712738329, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078598", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078598", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078598", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12407, "fingerprint": "2015|201500109|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500109|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f4be6f54d0c4363a", "measure_id": "201500109", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To upgrade and repair neighborhood schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Redwood City Elementary School District: renovate aging classrooms and science labs for 21st century learning; fix or replace deteriorating roofs; update classroom and instructional technology; improve school fire and earthquake safety; and repair, construct, acquire, or equip classrooms, sites, and facilities; by issuing $193 million in bonds at legal rates with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8370, "no_votes": 4817, "total_votes": 13187, "percent_yes": 63.47160081898839, "percent_no": 36.52839918101161, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082952", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082952", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12377, "fingerprint": "2015|201500079|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500079|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fe4ae9f57407ecb8", "measure_id": "201500079", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the position of City Clerk of the City of San Bruno be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2736, "no_votes": 2628, "total_votes": 5364, "percent_yes": 51.006711409395976, "percent_no": 48.993288590604024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077929", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077929", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077929", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12378, "fingerprint": "2015|201500080|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500080|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "1aef53796add73b3", "measure_id": "201500080", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To permanently protect and preserve rare San Carlos open space from development, protect a local water source, prevent increased traffic congestion, and improve access to tranquil natural areas and parks, including walking trails, recreation, and restrooms/facilities, shall the City of San Carlos issue $45 million in bonds to acquire, create, and enhance Black Mountain Park located along Alameda de las Pulgas between Madera Avenue and Melendy Drive, with citizen oversight and funds restricted to these specific purposes only?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3834, "no_votes": 5874, "total_votes": 9708, "percent_yes": 39.49320148331273, "percent_no": 60.50679851668727, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Land Use: Open Space", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078096", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.078096", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12384, "fingerprint": "2015|201500086|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500086|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "07ac8ebc5aa75cb9", "measure_id": "201500086", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain South San Francisco services, including maintaining neighborhood police patrols/9-1-1 response, programs for seniors/disabled residents, crime/gang suppression programs, repairing potholes/streets, maintaining youth/teen educational/recreational programs, providing a police operations center that meets earthquake safety codes, and other city services; shall South San Francisco levy a 1/2 cent sales tax for 30 years, with authority to incur debt to accelerate projects, annual audits, citizens' oversight, no funds for Sacramento and all funds for South San Francisco?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4494, "no_votes": 3007, "total_votes": 7501, "percent_yes": 59.9120117317691, "percent_no": 40.0879882682309, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079106", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079106", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12408, "fingerprint": "2015|201500110|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500110|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "cb2484877b6018d6", "measure_id": "201500110", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN MATEO Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide additional classrooms, relieve overcrowding and address increasing enrollment at San Mateo and Foster City schools, with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall San Mateo - Foster City Elementary School District replace aging portable classrooms, update ad add new classrooms, provide modern classrooms, reduce class size, improve handicapped access, repair, construct, acquire equipment, classrooms, sites/facilities, by issuing $148,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds benefiting San Mateo and Foster City schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13177, "no_votes": 9129, "total_votes": 22306, "percent_yes": 59.07379180489555, "percent_no": 40.92620819510445, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083156", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.083156", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN MATEO Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12391, "fingerprint": "2015|201500093|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500093|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4bb4484b79733407", "measure_id": "201500093", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve excellence in academic programs, including science, engineering, math, reading, writing, arts, and music with local funding that cannot be taken by the state; reduce class sizes; attract and retain qualified teachers; and advance health, well-being, and equitable opportunities for every student, shall the Palo Alto Unified School District renew its expiring parcel tax for six years, increase the rate by $120, and continue exemptions for seniors, annual two percent escalation adjustments, and independent oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13903, "no_votes": 4073, "total_votes": 17976, "percent_yes": 77.34201157098354, "percent_no": 22.657988429016456, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080308", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080308", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.080308", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12368, "fingerprint": "2015|201500070|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500070|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e1f4ceffd2ae419a", "measure_id": "201500070", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To replace the nearly 70-year old Hillview Community Center with a new facility to provide needed recreation and activity space and meeting rooms; to meet current handicapped and earthquake safety codes; to build community pool facilities; and to improve Hillview Park, open space and sports fields, shall the City of Los Altos issue $65,000,000 of bonds at the lowest available legal interest rates with all funds staying in Los Altos to benefit local residents, seniors and children?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2724, "no_votes": 6704, "total_votes": 9428, "percent_yes": 28.892660161221894, "percent_no": 71.1073398387781, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Facilities: Museum/Cultural/Comm Ctrs", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076363", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076363", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076363", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12414, "fingerprint": "2015|201500116|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500116|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "96f503f3924d62ed", "measure_id": "201500116", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Without increasing the current tax rate, to support high academic achievement for local elementary and middle school students with strong core academic programs like English, reading, math and science, retaining qualified teachers, and maintaining smaller class sizes, shall Union Elementary School District renew its expiring $96 education parcel tax for 10 years, exempting seniors, and guaranteeing: no use of funds for administrator salaries; independent oversight and annual audits; and every dollar staying in our local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5454, "no_votes": 1840, "total_votes": 7294, "percent_yes": 74.77378667397862, "percent_no": 25.22621332602138, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084190", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084190", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12389, "fingerprint": "2015|201500091|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500091|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a6913b46bdc007e2", "measure_id": "201500091", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To support quality education in local elementary and middle schools and provide stable local funding to maintain excellent core academic programs in reading, writing, math, and science, retain highly qualified teachers; and provide support for struggling students; shall Campbell Union Elementary School District authorize an annual $49 school parcel tax for 8 years with independent fiscal oversight, an exemption for seniors and qualified disabled citizens, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds benefitting our schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7327, "no_votes": 3475, "total_votes": 10802, "percent_yes": 67.83003147565265, "percent_no": 32.169968524347354, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079963", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.079963", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CLARA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12417, "fingerprint": "2015|201500119|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500119|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "9bbca98aff8c58a6", "measure_id": "201500119", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SANTA CRUZ Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To better prepare local middle and high school students for college and career success, shall Santa Cruz City High School District preserve instructional and after-school programs in Career Technical Education, science, technology, engineering and performing arts, and support athletic programs to keep kids safe, healthy and engaged in school, by establishing a parcel tax of $72 per year for 8 years only, with exemptions for senior citizens, independent citizen oversight, and all funds benefitting local middle and high schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15784, "no_votes": 6251, "total_votes": 22035, "percent_yes": 71.6314953483095, "percent_no": 28.3685046516905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-17", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084717", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084717", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084717", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA CRUZ Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12344, "fingerprint": "2015|201500046|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500046|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "9ba8cc0d3d58e518", "measure_id": "201500046", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SISKIYOU Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Weed impose a Transactions and Use Tax of 0.25% of the gross receipts of any sale or use pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7285.9 to fund the operation, maintenance, and improvement of a public library, to fund a portion of the costs of providing Senior Nutrition Meals within the city limit of the City of Weed and other senior programs and services, and for general municipal purposes including, police, fire protection and street maintenance and improvements?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 196, "no_votes": 79, "total_votes": 275, "percent_yes": 71.27272727272728, "percent_no": 28.72727272727272, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-03-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072331", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.072331", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SISKIYOU Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12361, "fingerprint": "2015|201500063|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500063|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "718c81747b4ac477", "measure_id": "201500063", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SISKIYOU Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Dunsmuir impose a Transactions and Use Tax of one-half of one percent (0.50%) of the gross receipts of any sale or use pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7285.9 to fund general operations of the City of Dunsmuir including supporting the Dunsmuir Library, Dunsmuir Recreation and Parks District activities including the Community Center, and other eligible projects and/or services within the City of Dunsmuir?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 206, "no_votes": 131, "total_votes": 337, "percent_yes": 61.12759643916914, "percent_no": 38.87240356083086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075200", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075200", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.075200", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SISKIYOU Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12312, "fingerprint": "2015|201500014|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500014|SONOMA", "content_hash": "44ad0f62835532cc", "measure_id": "201500014", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the people of Sonoma County enact a one-quarter percent sales tax for general governmental purposes such as public safety, local roads and pothole repair, senior, student and veterans transit and other essential services within the nine cities and unincorporated area for 5 years with annual audits made available to the public showing how all revenue was spent the previous year?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32741, "no_votes": 52630, "total_votes": 85371, "percent_yes": 38.35143081374237, "percent_no": 61.64856918625763, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-06-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066752", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066752", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066752", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12398, "fingerprint": "2015|201500100|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500100|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0b867c977e7994c4", "measure_id": "201500100", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain quality education without increasing taxes and preserve local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District maintain reading, writing, math and science programs; attract and retain qualified teachers; keep school libraries open; and prepare students for college and careers, by renewing the expiring parcel tax at the current rate for eight years, with exemptions for senior citizens, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5052, "no_votes": 2349, "total_votes": 7401, "percent_yes": 68.261045804621, "percent_no": 31.738954195378994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081459", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081459", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.081459", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12416, "fingerprint": "2015|201500118|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500118|SONOMA", "content_hash": "91caa75b1901cfeb", "measure_id": "201500118", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SONOMA Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Without increasing the current tax rate, to support academic excellence, provide stable funding the State cannot take away, to keep school libraries open, maintain computer and technology programs, reading programs, for small class sizes, music programs and for necessary programs and materials, shall the Wilmar Union School District be authorized to levy $50 per parcel annually for eight years, have no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, provide a senior citizens\u2019 exemption and have all funds stay local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 443, "no_votes": 263, "total_votes": 706, "percent_yes": 62.74787535410765, "percent_no": 37.25212464589235, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084540", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.084540", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SONOMA Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12357, "fingerprint": "2015|201500059|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500059|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "758815d3f688e489", "measure_id": "201500059", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Should the city institute \u201cby-district\u201d elections whereby four (4) council members would have to live in the district they represent, and be elected only by the voters living in that district, with a Mayor elected \u201cat-large\u201d by all of the voters in the city?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1846, "no_votes": 867, "total_votes": 2713, "percent_yes": 68.04275709546627, "percent_no": 31.95724290453373, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074516", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074516", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074516", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12358, "fingerprint": "2015|201500060|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500060|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "5b815ab113cf2623", "measure_id": "201500060", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the City\u2019s Municipal Code to increase the City\u2019s existing Transient Occupancy Tax, which is charged to occupants of hotels and motels, from five percent (5%) to ten percent (10%) at the rent charged by the hotel or motel?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1571, "no_votes": 1146, "total_votes": 2717, "percent_yes": 57.82112624217888, "percent_no": 42.17887375782112, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074691", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.074691", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12372, "fingerprint": "2015|201500074|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500074|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "c642723991f4d539", "measure_id": "201500074", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To implement the Safer Neighborhoods Initiative by restoring police patrols, crime prevention, gang suppression and youth development efforts; removing tagging; reducing nuisance properties; strengthening fire/emergency services; increasing neighborhood collaboration; and to maintain other general city services, shall the City of Modesto enact a \u00bd percent general sales tax that cannot be taken by the State, expires in 8 years, and requires audits, citizen oversight board reports, and all funds be spent in Modesto?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13078, "no_votes": 10302, "total_votes": 23380, "percent_yes": 55.93669803250641, "percent_no": 44.06330196749359, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077032", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077032", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.077032", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12370, "fingerprint": "2015|201500072|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500072|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "43502beff5ddf2cc", "measure_id": "201500072", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Do you want the City Council of the City of Modesto to extend sewer improvements to ten (10) specified residentially developed unincorporated areas, which may include undeveloped parcels, to which Measure M applies and for which an advisory vote has not yet been conducted? The areas that are the subject of this advisory measure are described in and depicted on a map included in the sample ballot / voter information pamphlet.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12769, "no_votes": 9764, "total_votes": 22533, "percent_yes": 56.66799804730839, "percent_no": 43.33200195269161, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "General Services: Wastewater/Sewage", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076697", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076697", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076697", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12371, "fingerprint": "2015|201500073|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500073|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a631ef61ed2ddb2e", "measure_id": "201500073", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "STANISLAUS Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE): Shall the City of Modesto 2008 Urban Area General Plan be amended to establish limit lines (boundaries) for nonresidential and medium and large lot residential development, outside of which areas new development subject to the limits would require voter approval?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11311, "no_votes": 11562, "total_votes": 22873, "percent_yes": 49.4513181480348, "percent_no": 50.5486818519652, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076865", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076865", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.076865", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "STANISLAUS Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12332, "fingerprint": "2015|201500034|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500034|TRINITY", "content_hash": "68abc81f5535e437", "measure_id": "201500034", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TRINITY Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the County of Trinity adopt an ordinance amending section 3.28 of the Trinity County Code by imposing a special five percent (5%) tax charged to guests of hotels and motels under the County\u2019s Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance for the purpose of providing more funding to local law enforcement, fire protection and promotion of tourism, with the maximum amount collected not exceeding two million dollars $2,000,000 per calendar year?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1579, "no_votes": 1112, "total_votes": 2691, "percent_yes": 58.677071720549975, "percent_no": 41.322928279450025, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070242", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.070242", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TRINITY Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12404, "fingerprint": "2015|201500106|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500106|VENTURA", "content_hash": "453e302a16f1561d", "measure_id": "201500106", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect the quality of education in our local schools, fund core programs in math, science, reading, technology and the arts, attract/retain highly qualified teachers, counselors, and technology specialists, maintain smaller class sizes, enhance student achievement and prepare our students for success in college and careers, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District continue for twelve years the existing $98 annual school parcel tax without raising the current rate, with an exemption for seniors, and all money staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 157, "no_votes": 36, "total_votes": 193, "percent_yes": 81.34715025906736, "percent_no": 18.652849740932638, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-11-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082455", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082455", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.082455", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12311, "fingerprint": "2015|201500013|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2015|201500013|VENTURA", "content_hash": "aa0fbd3c550aaa1c", "measure_id": "201500013", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2015, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "VENTURA Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the resolution adopted on November 19, 2014, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Ventura County ordering the formation of a waterworks district in the territory described, known as Ventura County Waterworks District No. 38, be approved, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the resolution?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 216, "no_votes": 49, "total_votes": 265, "percent_yes": 81.50943396226415, "percent_no": 18.490566037735846, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Incorporation/Formation/Annexation", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2015-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066575", "updated_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-28T14:30:27.066575", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VENTURA Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5023, "fingerprint": "2014|201400083|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400083|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "47ceb4c86acfcda2", "measure_id": "201400083", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Piedmont, at City Council discretion, issue bonds or otherwise incur debt in a principal amount not to exceed $8,000,000 to refinance a portion of the City\u2019s existing obligation to the California Public Employees Retirement System for the purpose of achieving debt service savings, as more specifically set forth in Ord. 711 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2305, "no_votes": 485, "total_votes": 2790, "percent_yes": 82.61648745519713, "percent_no": 17.38351254480287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-02-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.505617", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.833761", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Piedmont, at City Council discretion, issue bonds or otherwise incur debt in a principal amount not to exceed $8,000,000 to refinance a portion of the City\u2019s existing obligation to the California Public Employees Retirement System for the purpose of achieving debt service savings, as more specifically set forth in Ord. 711 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5021, "fingerprint": "2014|201400004|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400004|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9d333333d9372e27", "measure_id": "201400004", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Without increasing the existing half-cent sales and use tax for essential health services, to provide trauma and emergency medical services and primary, preventative healthcare for local residents including indigent, low-income and uninsured children, families and seniors, to prevent closure of county clinics and hospitals and to recruit/retain highly qualified nurses and healthcare professionals, shall Alameda County extend the essential healthcare services measure until June 2034 with annual fiscal oversight/review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 148001, "no_votes": 49307, "total_votes": 197308, "percent_yes": 75.01013643643441, "percent_no": 24.989863563565592, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.504701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.833371", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the existing half-cent sales and use tax for essential health services, to provide trauma and emergency medical services and primary, preventative healthcare for local residents including indigent, low-income and uninsured children, families and seniors, to prevent closure of county clinics and hospitals and to recruit/retain highly qualified nurses and healthcare professionals, shall Alameda County extend the essential healthcare services measure until June 2034 with annual fiscal oversight/review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5048, "fingerprint": "2014|201400371|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400371|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "cb083aed4e1424a8", "measure_id": "201400371", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing the existing tax rate and to maintain high quality education for all grades by sustaining academic achievement in math, science, reading, writing, and utilizing technology; supporting engineering/medicine/biotechnology academies; attracting/retaining highly qualified teachers; and maintaining school libraries, current instructional materials/technology, shall the Dublin Unified School District renew its expiring $96 parcel tax for five years, with a senior exemption, independent oversight, no money for administrators salaries and all funds staying in Dublin schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5200, "no_votes": 1300, "total_votes": 6500, "percent_yes": 80.0, "percent_no": 20.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-05-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.513341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.838839", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the existing tax rate and to maintain high quality education for all grades by sustaining academic achievement in math, science, reading, writing, and utilizing technology; supporting engineering/medicine/biotechnology academies; attracting/retaining highly qualified teachers; and maintaining school libraries, current instructional materials/technology, shall the Dublin Unified School District renew its expiring $96 parcel tax for five years, with a senior exemption, independent oversight, no money for administrators salaries and all funds staying in Dublin schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5022, "fingerprint": "2014|201400032|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400032|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "bf223874236e2810", "measure_id": "201400032", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize implementing the Alameda County 30 year Transportation Expenditure Plan to: Expand and modernize BART in Alameda County; Improve transit connections to jobs and schools; Fix roads, improve highways and increase bicycle and pedestrian safety; Reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality; and Keep senior, student, and disabled fares affordable? Approval augments by \u00bd cent and extends the existing County sales tax, with independent oversight and audits. All money will benefit local residents.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 240557, "no_votes": 99417, "total_votes": 339974, "percent_yes": 70.75746968885856, "percent_no": 29.242530311141437, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.505197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.833563", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize implementing the Alameda County 30 year Transportation Expenditure Plan to: Expand and modernize BART in Alameda County; Improve transit connections to jobs and schools; Fix roads, improve highways and increase bicycle and pedestrian safety; Reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality; and Keep senior, student, and disabled fares affordable? Approval augments by \u00bd cent and extends the existing County sales tax, with independent oversight and audits. All money will benefit local residents.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5024, "fingerprint": "2014|201400108|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400108|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "53c1e696060e8a38", "measure_id": "201400108", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To restore and maintain Hayward city services and facilities, including firefighting/emergency medical services; improving police protection for neighborhoods; replacing the aging library with a 21st century facility including safe space for after-school homework and tutoring; repairing potholes and streets; updating aging neighborhood fire stations; and other city services; shall the City of Hayward increase the sales tax by \u00bd percent, for twenty years only, providing locally controlled funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9238, "no_votes": 4477, "total_votes": 13715, "percent_yes": 67.35690849434926, "percent_no": 32.643091505650744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.505961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.833959", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore and maintain Hayward city services and facilities, including firefighting/emergency medical services; improving police protection for neighborhoods; replacing the aging library with a 21st century facility including safe space for after-school homework and tutoring; repairing potholes and streets; updating aging neighborhood fire stations; and other city services; shall the City of Hayward increase the sales tax by \u00bd percent, for twenty years only, providing locally controlled funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5038, "fingerprint": "2014|201400275|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400275|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "be9aee8b037fed9f", "measure_id": "201400275", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to provide the Public Ethics Commission greater independence, broader enforcement authority, powers and responsibilities, and minimum budget for staff to enforce compliance with ethics\u2010related laws and requirements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65738, "no_votes": 23190, "total_votes": 88928, "percent_yes": 73.92272400143936, "percent_no": 26.077275998560637, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.510369", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.836972", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to provide the Public Ethics Commission greater independence, broader enforcement authority, powers and responsibilities, and minimum budget for staff to enforce compliance with ethics\u2010related laws and requirements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5025, "fingerprint": "2014|201400164|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400164|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0393bbdf984879f5", "measure_id": "201400164", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance imposing a 1\u00a2 per ounce general tax on the distribution of sugar\u2010sweetened beverages (e.g., sodas, energy drinks, presweetened teas) and sweeteners used to sweeten such drinks, but exempting: (1) sweeteners (e.g., sugar, honey, syrups) typically used by consumers and distributed to grocery stores; (2) drinks and sweeteners distributed to very small retailers; (3) diet drinks, milk products, 100% juice, baby formula, alcohol, or drinks taken for medical reasons, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29540, "no_votes": 9243, "total_votes": 38783, "percent_yes": 76.16739292989196, "percent_no": 23.83260707010804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.506239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.834154", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance imposing a 1\u00a2 per ounce general tax on the distribution of sugar\u2010sweetened beverages (e.g., sodas, energy drinks, presweetened teas) and sweeteners used to sweeten such drinks, but exempting: (1) sweeteners (e.g., sugar, honey, syrups) typically used by consumers and distributed to grocery stores; (2) drinks and sweeteners distributed to very small retailers; (3) diet drinks, milk products, 100% juice, baby formula, alcohol, or drinks taken for medical reasons, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5039, "fingerprint": "2014|201400276|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400276|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ddcd2229cb564f25", "measure_id": "201400276", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to transfer to a 13\u2010member independent redistricting commission the City Council's authority to redraw the district boundary lines for the City Council and Oakland Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53493, "no_votes": 33561, "total_votes": 87054, "percent_yes": 61.44806671721, "percent_no": 38.55193328279, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.510664", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.837157", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to transfer to a 13\u2010member independent redistricting commission the City Council's authority to redraw the district boundary lines for the City Council and Oakland Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5049, "fingerprint": "2014|201400387|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400387|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2aba65402281462d", "measure_id": "201400387", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/repair neighborhood schools with local funding the State cannot take away, shall Fremont Unified School District update technology/aging classrooms, math, science/computer labs for 21st Century learning, upgrade electrical wiring to current safety codes, fix/replace leaky roofs, aging plumbing/restrooms, remove asbestos, repair, construct, acquire equipment, classrooms, sites, facilities, by issuing $650 million of bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators, salaries, benefits/pensions, and all funds for Fremont schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15971, "no_votes": 10135, "total_votes": 26106, "percent_yes": 61.17750708649352, "percent_no": 38.82249291350648, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.513677", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.839021", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/repair neighborhood schools with local funding the State cannot take away, shall Fremont Unified School District update technology/aging classrooms, math, science/computer labs for 21st Century learning, upgrade electrical wiring to current safety codes, fix/replace leaky roofs, aging plumbing/restrooms, remove asbestos, repair, construct, acquire equipment, classrooms, sites, facilities, by issuing $650 million of bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators, salaries, benefits/pensions, and all funds for Fremont schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5040, "fingerprint": "2014|201400277|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400277|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "28a00f4d267488b6", "measure_id": "201400277", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to authorize the City Council to adopt an ordinance by a 4/5 vote, that would eliminate the costs of administering the Oakland Municipal Employees' Retirement System (\"OMERS\") by purchasing annuities to pay all retirement benefits due to OMERS retirees and beneficiaries, provided the City holds all remaining OMERS assets in a trust for the benefit of retirees and beneficiaries until all benefits have been paid?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62256, "no_votes": 22346, "total_votes": 84602, "percent_yes": 73.58691283893998, "percent_no": 26.41308716106002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.510957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.837343", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to authorize the City Council to adopt an ordinance by a 4/5 vote, that would eliminate the costs of administering the Oakland Municipal Employees' Retirement System (\"OMERS\") by purchasing annuities to pay all retirement benefits due to OMERS retirees and beneficiaries, provided the City holds all remaining OMERS assets in a trust for the benefit of retirees and beneficiaries until all benefits have been paid?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5026, "fingerprint": "2014|201400165|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400165|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c44b0531bb20b3bf", "measure_id": "201400165", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the parks special tax be amended to sustain community parks like the Rose Garden, children\u2019s playgrounds, tennis, basketball courts, and ball fields, by increasing the per square foot tax rate from $0.1256 to $0.1466 and adding an inflation factor? Financial Implications The annual cost increase in fiscal year 2016 would be $39.90, from $238.64 to $278.54, for a 1,900 square foot home and $210, from $1256.00 to $1466.00, for a 10,000 square foot building.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27573, "no_votes": 9151, "total_votes": 36724, "percent_yes": 75.08169044766365, "percent_no": 24.918309552336353, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.506577", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.834350", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the parks special tax be amended to sustain community parks like the Rose Garden, children\u2019s playgrounds, tennis, basketball courts, and ball fields, by increasing the per square foot tax rate from $0.1256 to $0.1466 and adding an inflation factor? Financial Implications The annual cost increase in fiscal year 2016 would be $39.90, from $238.64 to $278.54, for a 1,900 square foot home and $210, from $1256.00 to $1466.00, for a 10,000 square foot building.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5041, "fingerprint": "2014|201400278|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400278|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2913e6c63f657a44", "measure_id": "201400278", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Oakland's Municipal Code Be Amended To: (1) Establish A Citywide Minimum Hourly Wage Of $12.25, To Be Increased Annually To Address Inflation; (2) Require Employers To Provide Employees Paid Sick Leave; (3) Require That Hotel, Restaurant And Banquet Facility Operators And Employers Pay Service Charges They Collect To Employees Providing Those Services; And (4) Provide Employees The Right To Bring An Action Against Employers To Enforce And Seek Remedies For Violation Of This Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 77183, "no_votes": 17204, "total_votes": 94387, "percent_yes": 81.7729136427686, "percent_no": 18.2270863572314, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.511227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.837524", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Oakland's Municipal Code Be Amended To: (1) Establish A Citywide Minimum Hourly Wage Of $12.25, To Be Increased Annually To Address Inflation; (2) Require Employers To Provide Employees Paid Sick Leave; (3) Require That Hotel, Restaurant And Banquet Facility Operators And Employers Pay Service Charges They Collect To Employees Providing Those Services; And (4) Provide Employees The Right To Bring An Action Against Employers To Enforce And Seek Remedies For Violation Of This Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5050, "fingerprint": "2014|201400395|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400395|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "deb4da01b54da919", "measure_id": "201400395", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the quality of Livermore public schools without raising tax rates; continue local funding for advanced courses in math, science, and engineering; keep schools well-maintained; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; provide elementary school science and technology specialists; and keep classroom technology and instructional materials up-to-date, shall the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $138 per parcel annually for seven years, with independent oversight and audits, exemptions for seniors, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11338, "no_votes": 4321, "total_votes": 15659, "percent_yes": 72.40564531579284, "percent_no": 27.59435468420716, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.513985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.839200", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of Livermore public schools without raising tax rates; continue local funding for advanced courses in math, science, and engineering; keep schools well-maintained; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; provide elementary school science and technology specialists; and keep classroom technology and instructional materials up-to-date, shall the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $138 per parcel annually for seven years, with independent oversight and audits, exemptions for seniors, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5043, "fingerprint": "2014|201400292|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400292|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "69631c8bfe732ec2", "measure_id": "201400292", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 2.01(D) and 8.01 and Section 7.05 of the Charter of the City of Piedmont be amended to conform the date of the City\u2019s General Municipal Election with the date of the statewide General Election in November; and conform the annual selection of officers of the Board of Education to the requirements of the California Education Code, respectively as more specifically set forth in Resolution 71\u201014 which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4326, "no_votes": 222, "total_votes": 4548, "percent_yes": 95.11873350923484, "percent_no": 4.881266490765157, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.511841", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.837894", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 2.01(D) and 8.01 and Section 7.05 of the Charter of the City of Piedmont be amended to conform the date of the City\u2019s General Municipal Election with the date of the statewide General Election in November; and conform the annual selection of officers of the Board of Education to the requirements of the California Education Code, respectively as more specifically set forth in Resolution 71\u201014 which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5051, "fingerprint": "2014|201400406|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400406|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "dec0fb3973c0b198", "measure_id": "201400406", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide Piedmont students and residents with a safe and accessible school theater facility, and to add and renovate classrooms, improve fire/life safety, energy efficiency, and ventilation, and repair/renovate aging structural, mechanical, electrical, and utility systems, shall Piedmont Unified School District issue up to $13,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1801, "no_votes": 1978, "total_votes": 3779, "percent_yes": 47.65811061127282, "percent_no": 52.34188938872718, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.514283", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.839383", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide Piedmont students and residents with a safe and accessible school theater facility, and to add and renovate classrooms, improve fire/life safety, energy efficiency, and ventilation, and repair/renovate aging structural, mechanical, electrical, and utility systems, shall Piedmont Unified School District issue up to $13,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5044, "fingerprint": "2014|201400326|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400326|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5382c3439f23b8b4", "measure_id": "201400326", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect/ maintain local services, including: 911 emergency response; neighborhood police patrols/ anti\u2010gang enforcement; library programs for children, adults/ families; after school programs for children/ teens including, homework assistance/ reading programs; school police officers/ crossing guards; repairing potholes/ maintaining residential streets; and other City services, shall the City of San Leandro extend Measure Z and set the sales tax at \u00bd cent for 30 years, with citizens oversight, annual audits, all funds for San Leandro, no funds for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10452, "no_votes": 5764, "total_votes": 16216, "percent_yes": 64.45485939812531, "percent_no": 35.54514060187469, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.512223", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.838083", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect/ maintain local services, including: 911 emergency response; neighborhood police patrols/ anti\u2010gang enforcement; library programs for children, adults/ families; after school programs for children/ teens including, homework assistance/ reading programs; school police officers/ crossing guards; repairing potholes/ maintaining residential streets; and other City services, shall the City of San Leandro extend Measure Z and set the sales tax at \u00bd cent for 30 years, with citizens oversight, annual audits, all funds for San Leandro, no funds for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5052, "fingerprint": "2014|201400426|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400426|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "82bb5c02ebd83690", "measure_id": "201400426", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve schools to provide high quality education by renovating neighborhood schools, improving earthquake safety and student security, upgrading science and computer labs, improving heating, cooling, plumbing, and electrical systems, replacing leaky roofs, windows, and doors, installing solar systems, and renovating, constructing, and acquiring classrooms, sites, facilities, and equipment, shall Alameda Unified School District issue $179,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits and citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds benefiting neighborhood schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13111, "no_votes": 7783, "total_votes": 20894, "percent_yes": 62.75007179094477, "percent_no": 37.24992820905523, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.514549", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.839565", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve schools to provide high quality education by renovating neighborhood schools, improving earthquake safety and student security, upgrading science and computer labs, improving heating, cooling, plumbing, and electrical systems, replacing leaky roofs, windows, and doors, installing solar systems, and renovating, constructing, and acquiring classrooms, sites, facilities, and equipment, shall Alameda Unified School District issue $179,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits and citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds benefiting neighborhood schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5045, "fingerprint": "2014|201400327|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400327|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1f08bc7f6d7b9c9c", "measure_id": "201400327", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Leandro Charter be amended to provide that the City Council, at its first regular meeting in January of each year, shall designate one of its members Vice Mayor, to serve for a period of one year and until a successor is elected and qualified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10542, "no_votes": 4125, "total_votes": 14667, "percent_yes": 71.8756391900184, "percent_no": 28.124360809981596, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.512521", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.838281", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Leandro Charter be amended to provide that the City Council, at its first regular meeting in January of each year, shall designate one of its members Vice Mayor, to serve for a period of one year and until a successor is elected and qualified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5046, "fingerprint": "2014|201400355|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400355|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "71b029bd3d2515b6", "measure_id": "201400355", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent severe cuts to, and maintain essential services such as police, fire, paramedic, library, streets, parks and other services, shall Union City adopt an Ordinance extending the existing voter approved Measure AA sales tax with no increase in tax rate, requiring a citizen\u2019s oversight committee, annual independent audits, and all funds for Union City and no funds for the State of California?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8920, "no_votes": 3177, "total_votes": 12097, "percent_yes": 73.73729023724891, "percent_no": 26.262709762751086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.512796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.838462", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent severe cuts to, and maintain essential services such as police, fire, paramedic, library, streets, parks and other services, shall Union City adopt an Ordinance extending the existing voter approved Measure AA sales tax with no increase in tax rate, requiring a citizen\u2019s oversight committee, annual independent audits, and all funds for Union City and no funds for the State of California?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5054, "fingerprint": "2014|201400456|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400456|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b1c536a8af99aeec", "measure_id": "201400456", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing taxes, to improve Emeryville schools/student achievement by continuing local funding for programs including: reading, writing, math, science; keeping classes small/school libraries open; recruiting/retaining qualified, experienced teachers/staff; maintaining classroom technology; providing counselors; shall Emery Unified School District renew its existing voter\u2010approved parcel tax at the current rate of 15 cents per square foot of building area for 20 years with a senior exemption, Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1952, "no_votes": 327, "total_votes": 2279, "percent_yes": 85.65160157964019, "percent_no": 14.348398420359814, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.515169", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.839932", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing taxes, to improve Emeryville schools/student achievement by continuing local funding for programs including: reading, writing, math, science; keeping classes small/school libraries open; recruiting/retaining qualified, experienced teachers/staff; maintaining classroom technology; providing counselors; shall Emery Unified School District renew its existing voter\u2010approved parcel tax at the current rate of 15 cents per square foot of building area for 20 years with a senior exemption, Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5047, "fingerprint": "2014|201400356|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400356|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0ebb0b6320312d04", "measure_id": "201400356", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that amends Union City\u2019s General Plan and Hillside Area Plan to permit development of 63 acres of land owned by the Masons of California, located to the Northeast of Mission Boulevard, subject to all required entitlement processes and environmental review, and move the Hillside Area Plan boundary to accommodate new senior housing and health care facilities, low\u2010density single family residences, retail space, parks, open space, trails and a community garden?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4293, "no_votes": 8277, "total_votes": 12570, "percent_yes": 34.15274463007159, "percent_no": 65.8472553699284, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.513071", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.838653", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that amends Union City\u2019s General Plan and Hillside Area Plan to permit development of 63 acres of land owned by the Masons of California, located to the Northeast of Mission Boulevard, subject to all required entitlement processes and environmental review, and move the Hillside Area Plan boundary to accommodate new senior housing and health care facilities, low\u2010density single family residences, retail space, parks, open space, trails and a community garden?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5055, "fingerprint": "2014|201400470|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400470|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "88669a243013581a", "measure_id": "201400470", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education and student safety at local schools, with funding that the State cannot take away, shall Hayward Unified School District: modernize, renovate, replace aging classrooms, bathrooms, leaking roofs; replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation systems; update classroom computer technology/science labs; improve access for disabled students; and install modern fire safety/emergency communication systems; by issuing $229 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17976, "no_votes": 5263, "total_votes": 23239, "percent_yes": 77.35272602091312, "percent_no": 22.647273979086876, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.515475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.840119", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education and student safety at local schools, with funding that the State cannot take away, shall Hayward Unified School District: modernize, renovate, replace aging classrooms, bathrooms, leaking roofs; replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation systems; update classroom computer technology/science labs; improve access for disabled students; and install modern fire safety/emergency communication systems; by issuing $229 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5053, "fingerprint": "2014|201400427|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400427|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6551bcb1f7b2ac51", "measure_id": "201400427", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent schools; preserve funding for science, art, music, library services, and reading and math support; attract and retain exceptional teachers and counselors; limit class sizes; and keep schools safe and technology and textbooks up\u2010to\u2010date; shall Albany Unified School District replace an expiring $159/year parcel tax with a temporary, six\u2010year parcel tax of $278/year, with senior and SSI/SSDI exemptions, adjustments for inflation, independent audits, and all funds staying local to benefit Albany students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4875, "no_votes": 924, "total_votes": 5799, "percent_yes": 84.06621831350233, "percent_no": 15.933781686497667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.514892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.839746", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent schools; preserve funding for science, art, music, library services, and reading and math support; attract and retain exceptional teachers and counselors; limit class sizes; and keep schools safe and technology and textbooks up\u2010to\u2010date; shall Albany Unified School District replace an expiring $159/year parcel tax with a temporary, six\u2010year parcel tax of $278/year, with senior and SSI/SSDI exemptions, adjustments for inflation, independent audits, and all funds staying local to benefit Albany students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5056, "fingerprint": "2014|201400500|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400500|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "826f6bbc67f1a683", "measure_id": "201400500", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue critical school renovation and modernization projects, replace old portables with permanent classrooms, update school safety and security, improve student access to computers and technology, upgrade athletic facilities, increase the energy efficiency of classrooms and buildings, replace, acquire, construct and renovate District facilities and provide District\u2010wide technology improvements, shall the New Haven Unified School District issue $125 million in bonds at legal interest rates with an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8962, "no_votes": 4082, "total_votes": 13044, "percent_yes": 68.70591842992947, "percent_no": 31.29408157007053, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.515820", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.840300", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue critical school renovation and modernization projects, replace old portables with permanent classrooms, update school safety and security, improve student access to computers and technology, upgrade athletic facilities, increase the energy efficiency of classrooms and buildings, replace, acquire, construct and renovate District facilities and provide District\u2010wide technology improvements, shall the New Haven Unified School District issue $125 million in bonds at legal interest rates with an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5057, "fingerprint": "2014|201400505|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400505|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7b38330dd4f06b28", "measure_id": "201400505", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce the drop\u2010out rate and provide Oakland high school students with real\u2010world work and learning opportunities; prepare students for admission to the University of California and other four\u2010year colleges; expand mentoring, tutoring, counseling, support services, and transition to job training programs; shall the Oakland Unified School District levy a $120 parcel tax for ten years, with low income and senior exemptions, no money for Sacramento, and all money benefitting Oakland students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73905, "no_votes": 22620, "total_votes": 96525, "percent_yes": 76.56565656565657, "percent_no": 23.434343434343432, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.516097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.840491", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce the drop\u2010out rate and provide Oakland high school students with real\u2010world work and learning opportunities; prepare students for admission to the University of California and other four\u2010year colleges; expand mentoring, tutoring, counseling, support services, and transition to job training programs; shall the Oakland Unified School District levy a $120 parcel tax for ten years, with low income and senior exemptions, no money for Sacramento, and all money benefitting Oakland students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5027, "fingerprint": "2014|201400166|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400166|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0b53af7aeedcdcf9", "measure_id": "201400166", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to conform the provisions for the recall of elective officers to recent judicial rulings and the state Elections Code with respect to counting of votes, signature threshold, petition circulators, and signature verification, and adjust the deadlines for calling recall elections to allow for consolidation with statewide elections? Financial Implications: Potential cost savings from increased likelihood of election consolidation.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29741, "no_votes": 3098, "total_votes": 32839, "percent_yes": 90.5660951916928, "percent_no": 9.433904808307204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.506892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.834549", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to conform the provisions for the recall of elective officers to recent judicial rulings and the state Elections Code with respect to counting of votes, signature threshold, petition circulators, and signature verification, and adjust the deadlines for calling recall elections to allow for consolidation with statewide elections? Financial Implications: Potential cost savings from increased likelihood of election consolidation.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5028, "fingerprint": "2014|201400167|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400167|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1f54bb78456ecbe1", "measure_id": "201400167", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the United States Constitution be amended to abolish the legal concept that corporations are persons that are entitled to constitutional rights, and the doctrine that the expenditure of money may be treated as speech?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30703, "no_votes": 5559, "total_votes": 36262, "percent_yes": 84.66990237714411, "percent_no": 15.330097622855888, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.507191", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.834739", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the United States Constitution be amended to abolish the legal concept that corporations are persons that are entitled to constitutional rights, and the doctrine that the expenditure of money may be treated as speech?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5029, "fingerprint": "2014|201400168|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400168|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c5bbb071ec79297f", "measure_id": "201400168", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the People of the City of Berkeley advise the City Council to adopt an ordinance based on proposed federal legislation and the San Francisco Family Friendly Workplace Ordinance giving employees in Berkeley the right to request to work part\u2010time, and send letters to the state and federal elected officials, requesting the state and federal governments to give government employees the right to have shorter work hours, if doing so would not cause operational problems?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27347, "no_votes": 7363, "total_votes": 34710, "percent_yes": 78.78709305675598, "percent_no": 21.212906943244022, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.507485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.834942", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the People of the City of Berkeley advise the City Council to adopt an ordinance based on proposed federal legislation and the San Francisco Family Friendly Workplace Ordinance giving employees in Berkeley the right to request to work part\u2010time, and send letters to the state and federal elected officials, requesting the state and federal governments to give government employees the right to have shorter work hours, if doing so would not cause operational problems?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5030, "fingerprint": "2014|201400169|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400169|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ee3a9970f51e98ac", "measure_id": "201400169", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending Zoning Ordinance provisions for downtown Berkeley be adopted to: establish new requirements for new buildings over 60 feet; eliminate current historic resource determination for Green Pathway projects; establish a Civic Center Historic District overlay; amend LEED requirements; change parking requirements; restrict some permitted uses; change prevailing\u2010wage requirements for workers in specified categories; and reduce hours of operation for businesses selling or serving alcohol?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9345, "no_votes": 26726, "total_votes": 36071, "percent_yes": 25.907238501843587, "percent_no": 74.09276149815642, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.507762", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.835144", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending Zoning Ordinance provisions for downtown Berkeley be adopted to: establish new requirements for new buildings over 60 feet; eliminate current historic resource determination for Green Pathway projects; establish a Civic Center Historic District overlay; amend LEED requirements; change parking requirements; restrict some permitted uses; change prevailing\u2010wage requirements for workers in specified categories; and reduce hours of operation for businesses selling or serving alcohol?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5031, "fingerprint": "2014|201400170|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400170|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "51ec98e12087faba", "measure_id": "201400170", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 7,320\u2010N.S. authorizing the adjustment of Berkeley City Council district boundaries pursuant to Section 9, Article V of the Berkeley City Charter, to equalize population in the districts as a result of population changes reflected in the 2010 decennial federal census be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21240, "no_votes": 12048, "total_votes": 33288, "percent_yes": 63.806777217015146, "percent_no": 36.193222782984854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.508034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.835341", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 7,320\u2010N.S. authorizing the adjustment of Berkeley City Council district boundaries pursuant to Section 9, Article V of the Berkeley City Charter, to equalize population in the districts as a result of population changes reflected in the 2010 decennial federal census be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5032, "fingerprint": "2014|201400202|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400202|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9224ad23097bbc49", "measure_id": "201400202", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that directs the City to pursue annexation of an area, called Doolan Canyon, beyond the City\u2019s adopted urban limit line and immediately east of the current city limits and consisting of approximately 1,650 acres of primarily agricultural and open space lands; and would allow the City Council to approve future development in that area without further voter approval, but only after it approves a comprehensive plan incorporating specified development restrictions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1642, "no_votes": 8494, "total_votes": 10136, "percent_yes": 16.19968429360694, "percent_no": 83.80031570639306, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.508373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.835712", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that directs the City to pursue annexation of an area, called Doolan Canyon, beyond the City\u2019s adopted urban limit line and immediately east of the current city limits and consisting of approximately 1,650 acres of primarily agricultural and open space lands; and would allow the City Council to approve future development in that area without further voter approval, but only after it approves a comprehensive plan incorporating specified development restrictions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5033, "fingerprint": "2014|201400205|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400205|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "06d44d7e1cd5d9fe", "measure_id": "201400205", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To enhance local control over funding essential city services, shall the City of Emeryville Charter be adopted to establish Emeryville as a charter city with the ability to adopt a local real property transfer tax, subject to voter approval? The city Council\u2019s powers otherwise remain unchanged and are limited by State general law, and any other powers as a charter city would have to be approved by the voters.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1314, "no_votes": 967, "total_votes": 2281, "percent_yes": 57.60631302060499, "percent_no": 42.39368697939501, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.508734", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.836042", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance local control over funding essential city services, shall the City of Emeryville Charter be adopted to establish Emeryville as a charter city with the ability to adopt a local real property transfer tax, subject to voter approval? The city Council\u2019s powers otherwise remain unchanged and are limited by State general law, and any other powers as a charter city would have to be approved by the voters.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5034, "fingerprint": "2014|201400206|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400206|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f92b9380b821a5eb", "measure_id": "201400206", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure funding to maintain essential city services such as: police, fire and emergency services protection; street, sewer and storm drain maintenance; park and open space development and maintenance; bike and pedestrian safety; child care and programs for youth and seniors, shall the City of Emeryville adopt a Real Property Transfer Tax paid only by buyers and sellers of property at the time of sale with all funds benefiting Emeryville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1353, "no_votes": 921, "total_votes": 2274, "percent_yes": 59.49868073878628, "percent_no": 40.50131926121372, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.509004", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.836235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure funding to maintain essential city services such as: police, fire and emergency services protection; street, sewer and storm drain maintenance; park and open space development and maintenance; bike and pedestrian safety; child care and programs for youth and seniors, shall the City of Emeryville adopt a Real Property Transfer Tax paid only by buyers and sellers of property at the time of sale with all funds benefiting Emeryville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5035, "fingerprint": "2014|201400246|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400246|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "31f95ec1164e4658", "measure_id": "201400246", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance restricting future increases in the monthly compensation for the mayor and council members to the lesser of either the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area from the prior election cycle or 5% of the then existing compensation be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16848, "no_votes": 4195, "total_votes": 21043, "percent_yes": 80.06462956802737, "percent_no": 19.93537043197263, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.509270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.836420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance restricting future increases in the monthly compensation for the mayor and council members to the lesser of either the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area from the prior election cycle or 5% of the then existing compensation be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5036, "fingerprint": "2014|201400247|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400247|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2171f3523593c945", "measure_id": "201400247", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance that prohibits the City from paying for the mayor and councilmembers to participate in the health benefits provided to City employees be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14914, "no_votes": 6043, "total_votes": 20957, "percent_yes": 71.1647659493248, "percent_no": 28.835234050675197, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.509539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.836600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance that prohibits the City from paying for the mayor and councilmembers to participate in the health benefits provided to City employees be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5037, "fingerprint": "2014|201400270|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400270|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c3b512297325c615", "measure_id": "201400270", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain critical City services, including neighborhood patrols, crime prevention, anti\u2010drug/ gang\u2010prevention programs, 9\u20101\u20101 emergency response, fire protection services, City streets, repairing potholes, keeping the Senior Center open, maintaining school police officers, parks/ recreation programs, and other city services, shall the City of Newark extend the existing, voter\u2010approved utility users tax for 5 years, reducing the rate from 3.5% to 3.25%, exempting seniors and low\u2010income residents, requiring independent audits, with no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5655, "no_votes": 1886, "total_votes": 7541, "percent_yes": 74.99005436944702, "percent_no": 25.009945630552977, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.509959", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.836778", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain critical City services, including neighborhood patrols, crime prevention, anti\u2010drug/ gang\u2010prevention programs, 9\u20101\u20101 emergency response, fire protection services, City streets, repairing potholes, keeping the Senior Center open, maintaining school police officers, parks/ recreation programs, and other city services, shall the City of Newark extend the existing, voter\u2010approved utility users tax for 5 years, reducing the rate from 3.5% to 3.25%, exempting seniors and low\u2010income residents, requiring independent audits, with no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5042, "fingerprint": "2014|201400279|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400279|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "926badbe32f2abb6", "measure_id": "201400279", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing current tax rates, to reduce gun violence, robberies, and homicides, improve 9\u20101\u20101 response times and support at\u2010risk youth/young adults, shall the City provide improved police, fire and emergency response services and proven community programs, including dropout prevention, crisis intervention, and job training/placement, by continuing to collect a parking tax surcharge and a parcel tax for 10 years subject to annual performance and financial audits monitored by a citizens oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75556, "no_votes": 21946, "total_votes": 97502, "percent_yes": 77.49174375910238, "percent_no": 22.508256240897623, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.511560", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.837705", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing current tax rates, to reduce gun violence, robberies, and homicides, improve 9\u20101\u20101 response times and support at\u2010risk youth/young adults, shall the City provide improved police, fire and emergency response services and proven community programs, including dropout prevention, crisis intervention, and job training/placement, by continuing to collect a parking tax surcharge and a parcel tax for 10 years subject to annual performance and financial audits monitored by a citizens oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5058, "fingerprint": "2014|201400033|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400033|BUTTE", "content_hash": "3f628eabba8e1773", "measure_id": "201400033", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance 4075, an ordinance amending Sections 34A-4, 34A-5 and 34A-8 to Article I, Chapter 34A entitled, \u201cRestrictions on Cultivation of Medical Marijuana\u201d of the Butte County Code, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36634, "no_votes": 24187, "total_votes": 60821, "percent_yes": 60.23248549020897, "percent_no": 39.76751450979103, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.516368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.840678", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 4075, an ordinance amending Sections 34A-4, 34A-5 and 34A-8 to Article I, Chapter 34A entitled, \u201cRestrictions on Cultivation of Medical Marijuana\u201d of the Butte County Code, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5059, "fingerprint": "2014|201400034|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400034|BUTTE", "content_hash": "b5d377d37626281b", "measure_id": "201400034", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance entitled \u201cInitiative Measure to Enact Voter Approved County Ordinance on Marijuana Cultivation\u201d be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39888, "no_votes": 20696, "total_votes": 60584, "percent_yes": 65.83916545622607, "percent_no": 34.16083454377393, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.516669", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.840863", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance entitled \u201cInitiative Measure to Enact Voter Approved County Ordinance on Marijuana Cultivation\u201d be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5060, "fingerprint": "2014|201400289|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400289|BUTTE", "content_hash": "893a259bc4623306", "measure_id": "201400289", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 545, a temporary sales tax increase of one-half percent (0.50%) that automatically expires in six years, and that establishes a citizen oversight committee to ensure that the funds are used to preserve public services such as police protection, fire suppression, street maintenance, animal control and other services for the Town of Paradise, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4703, "no_votes": 4433, "total_votes": 9136, "percent_yes": 51.4776707530648, "percent_no": 48.5223292469352, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.516939", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.841048", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 545, a temporary sales tax increase of one-half percent (0.50%) that automatically expires in six years, and that establishes a citizen oversight committee to ensure that the funds are used to preserve public services such as police protection, fire suppression, street maintenance, animal control and other services for the Town of Paradise, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5062, "fingerprint": "2014|201400446|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400446|COLUSA", "content_hash": "2105fe299387aa4f", "measure_id": "201400446", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Colusa students' math, science, reading, and writing skills, by repairing leaky roofs, deteriorating restrooms, plumbing, heating, wiring; providing modern computer technology; renovating outdated classrooms, libraries, agricultural/vocational facilities, science and computer labs; improving fire alarms and school safety; removing asbestos/hazardous materials; acquiring, renovating,constructing, equipping accessible classrooms, sites and facilities; shall Colusa Unified School District issue $5,900,000 in bonds at legal rates, using independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, all funds benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1049, "no_votes": 614, "total_votes": 1663, "percent_yes": 63.07877330126278, "percent_no": 36.92122669873722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.517645", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.841419", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Colusa students' math, science, reading, and writing skills, by repairing leaky roofs, deteriorating restrooms, plumbing, heating, wiring; providing modern computer technology; renovating outdated classrooms, libraries, agricultural/vocational facilities, science and computer labs; improving fire alarms and school safety; removing asbestos/hazardous materials; acquiring, renovating,constructing, equipping accessible classrooms, sites and facilities; shall Colusa Unified School District issue $5,900,000 in bonds at legal rates, using independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, all funds benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5061, "fingerprint": "2014|201400410|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400410|COLUSA", "content_hash": "2bfd7c4d1e36889e", "measure_id": "201400410", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, science labs and school facilities, upgrade out-of-date plumbing, sewer, electrical, heating and air conditioning systems, upgrade classroom learning technology and improve school safety and accessibility, shall Princeton Joint Unified School District issue $2,750,000 of bonds at legal rates, to acquire, repair and equip classrooms, sites, facilities, with mandatory independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, all money staying local and no funds take by the State or used for employee salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82, "no_votes": 34, "total_votes": 116, "percent_yes": 70.6896551724138, "percent_no": 29.310344827586206, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.517207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.841235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, science labs and school facilities, upgrade out-of-date plumbing, sewer, electrical, heating and air conditioning systems, upgrade classroom learning technology and improve school safety and accessibility, shall Princeton Joint Unified School District issue $2,750,000 of bonds at legal rates, to acquire, repair and equip classrooms, sites, facilities, with mandatory independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, all money staying local and no funds take by the State or used for employee salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5072, "fingerprint": "2014|201400369|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400369|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f7c4e14ab61ada47", "measure_id": "201400369", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to preserve the high quality of education in our local high schools, continue offering advanced courses in math, science, technology, music and the arts, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and maintain manageable class sizes, shall the Acalanes Union High School District, with no increase in the current rate, continue to levy a $112 per-parcel tax with an exemption for seniors, and all money staying in our community to benefit our local high schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23968, "no_votes": 7947, "total_votes": 31915, "percent_yes": 75.09948300172333, "percent_no": 24.90051699827667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-05-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.520438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.843249", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to preserve the high quality of education in our local high schools, continue offering advanced courses in math, science, technology, music and the arts, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and maintain manageable class sizes, shall the Acalanes Union High School District, with no increase in the current rate, continue to levy a $112 per-parcel tax with an exemption for seniors, and all money staying in our community to benefit our local high schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5073, "fingerprint": "2014|201400372|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400372|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8e3793596675fe16", "measure_id": "201400372", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing existing tax rates, and to preserve high quality academic programs in Lafayette elementary and middle schools in math, science, art, and music; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; keep classroom technology, science labs and instructional materials up-to-date, and maintain manageable class sizes, shall Lafayette School District extend the expiring $539 local school tax, with an exemption for seniors, an annual cost-of-living adjustment, and with all money staying in Lafayette to benefit our public schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6504, "no_votes": 2391, "total_votes": 8895, "percent_yes": 73.11973018549747, "percent_no": 26.880269814502526, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-05-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.520772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.843432", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing existing tax rates, and to preserve high quality academic programs in Lafayette elementary and middle schools in math, science, art, and music; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; keep classroom technology, science labs and instructional materials up-to-date, and maintain manageable class sizes, shall Lafayette School District extend the expiring $539 local school tax, with an exemption for seniors, an annual cost-of-living adjustment, and with all money staying in Lafayette to benefit our public schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5074, "fingerprint": "2014|201400381|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400381|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ca3397159f725dd4", "measure_id": "201400381", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade educational facilities at Diablo Valley, Contra Costa, and Los Medanos Colleges, and the San Ramon and Brentwood centers, and help prepare students for jobs and college transfer by modernizing classrooms and labs, building facilities for health, medical, science, and technology training, and implementing earthquake safety, accessibility, and infrastructure improvements, shall the Contra Costa Community College District issue $450 million of bonds at legal interest rates with independent oversight, audits, and all funds spent on local sites?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82464, "no_votes": 60704, "total_votes": 143168, "percent_yes": 57.59946356727761, "percent_no": 42.40053643272239, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.521044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.843619", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade educational facilities at Diablo Valley, Contra Costa, and Los Medanos Colleges, and the San Ramon and Brentwood centers, and help prepare students for jobs and college transfer by modernizing classrooms and labs, building facilities for health, medical, science, and technology training, and implementing earthquake safety, accessibility, and infrastructure improvements, shall the Contra Costa Community College District issue $450 million of bonds at legal interest rates with independent oversight, audits, and all funds spent on local sites?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5075, "fingerprint": "2014|201400420|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400420|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8d7dc68dd860eaa4", "measure_id": "201400420", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade neighborhood schools, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District improve earthquake safety, seniors and handicap accessibility; update science, computer labs, remove asbestos, hazardous materials and lead-based paint; bring all West County schools up to the same quality; meet fire codes, construct, equip facilities, thereby increasing public safety, by issuing $270 million of bonds the State cannot take away, at legal rates, with strict citizens oversight, annual audits and no money for pensions or administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13529, "no_votes": 15686, "total_votes": 29215, "percent_yes": 46.30840321752524, "percent_no": 53.69159678247476, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.522423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.843994", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade neighborhood schools, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District improve earthquake safety, seniors and handicap accessibility; update science, computer labs, remove asbestos, hazardous materials and lead-based paint; bring all West County schools up to the same quality; meet fire codes, construct, equip facilities, thereby increasing public safety, by issuing $270 million of bonds the State cannot take away, at legal rates, with strict citizens oversight, annual audits and no money for pensions or administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5063, "fingerprint": "2014|201400112|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400112|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "788169a80c4359e3", "measure_id": "201400112", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To repair failing roads and storm drains, restore and upgrade other roadways and storm drains, fix potholes, and improve safety on Orinda public streets, shall the City of Orinda issue twenty million dollars in bonds, with financial audits, public review of all expenditures, and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4431, "no_votes": 1438, "total_votes": 5869, "percent_yes": 75.49838132560913, "percent_no": 24.50161867439087, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.517925", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.841600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair failing roads and storm drains, restore and upgrade other roadways and storm drains, fix potholes, and improve safety on Orinda public streets, shall the City of Orinda issue twenty million dollars in bonds, with financial audits, public review of all expenditures, and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5064, "fingerprint": "2014|201400134|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400134|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "96cd06a3d55785e2", "measure_id": "201400134", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure continued and adequate Emergency Medical Services for San Pablo residents, given the recent threat that County Fire Station #70, which is located in San Pablo, may be downsized or closed and given that Station 70 presently provides 100% of the EMS services for all San Pablo residents, shall San Pablo increase its sales tax by one-quarter percent to fund the creation of an Emergency Medical Services Squad, with mandatory audits, community oversight, and annual reporting?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1103, "no_votes": 455, "total_votes": 1558, "percent_yes": 70.79589216944801, "percent_no": 29.20410783055199, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.518197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.841790", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure continued and adequate Emergency Medical Services for San Pablo residents, given the recent threat that County Fire Station #70, which is located in San Pablo, may be downsized or closed and given that Station 70 presently provides 100% of the EMS services for all San Pablo residents, shall San Pablo increase its sales tax by one-quarter percent to fund the creation of an Emergency Medical Services Squad, with mandatory audits, community oversight, and annual reporting?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5076, "fingerprint": "2014|201400476|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400476|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b8017b44514ce8a4", "measure_id": "201400476", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To bring educational facilities and classrooms up to current earthquake safety standards;  increase student access to classroom technology and science labs; improve vocational education facilities; complete John Swett High School renovations; and construct a new middle school: shall John Swett Unified School District be authorized to issue $52,000,000 of bonds at rates below legal limits, with oversight and audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1687, "no_votes": 1442, "total_votes": 3129, "percent_yes": 53.91498881431768, "percent_no": 46.08501118568232, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.527915", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.844190", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To bring educational facilities and classrooms up to current earthquake safety standards;  increase student access to classroom technology and science labs; improve vocational education facilities; complete John Swett High School renovations; and construct a new middle school: shall John Swett Unified School District be authorized to issue $52,000,000 of bonds at rates below legal limits, with oversight and audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5077, "fingerprint": "2014|201400511|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400511|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "dbccdc2aa34e83d5", "measure_id": "201400511", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe, modern neighborhood schools with updated computer technology, upgrade energy systems, including solar, reduce overcrowding, improve student learning by acquiring, upgrading, constructing, equipping classrooms, science/computer labs, and school facilities, replace aging roofs, plumbing,  eating, ventilation/electrical systems, improve fire alarms, school security and earthquake safety, shall Pittsburg Unified School District issue $85,000,000 of bonds, within legal rates and state approved bonding capacity limits with independent oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5483, "no_votes": 2524, "total_votes": 8007, "percent_yes": 68.4775821156488, "percent_no": 31.5224178843512, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.528529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.844372", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe, modern neighborhood schools with updated computer technology, upgrade energy systems, including solar, reduce overcrowding, improve student learning by acquiring, upgrading, constructing, equipping classrooms, science/computer labs, and school facilities, replace aging roofs, plumbing,  eating, ventilation/electrical systems, improve fire alarms, school security and earthquake safety, shall Pittsburg Unified School District issue $85,000,000 of bonds, within legal rates and state approved bonding capacity limits with independent oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5065, "fingerprint": "2014|201400155|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400155|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f8a9393e18f48eea", "measure_id": "201400155", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding that cannot be seized by the State, to maintain such general City services as police services, code enforcement, street repairs, senior services and youth programs, shall the City of Antioch adopt a residential landlord business license tax based on the type and number of units and confirm the existing gross receipts business license tax with an increased minimum tax, which is not a tax on the general public?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8737, "no_votes": 8189, "total_votes": 16926, "percent_yes": 51.618811296230646, "percent_no": 48.381188703769354, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.518533", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.841973", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding that cannot be seized by the State, to maintain such general City services as police services, code enforcement, street repairs, senior services and youth programs, shall the City of Antioch adopt a residential landlord business license tax based on the type and number of units and confirm the existing gross receipts business license tax with an increased minimum tax, which is not a tax on the general public?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5066, "fingerprint": "2014|201400185|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400185|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "cec1375dd2253272", "measure_id": "201400185", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue the operation and maintenance of the Downtown \u201cThe Grove\u201d Park, shall the existing special tax, funded by the citywide Community Facilities District 2006-1 levy, be extended at the current annual special tax with the same methodology rate (currently $19.03 per year for single-family residential parcels, with higher commercial parcel rate) for Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2036/2037?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3212, "no_votes": 741, "total_votes": 3953, "percent_yes": 81.25474323298761, "percent_no": 18.745256767012393, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.518810", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.842153", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue the operation and maintenance of the Downtown \u201cThe Grove\u201d Park, shall the existing special tax, funded by the citywide Community Facilities District 2006-1 levy, be extended at the current annual special tax with the same methodology rate (currently $19.03 per year for single-family residential parcels, with higher commercial parcel rate) for Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2036/2037?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5067, "fingerprint": "2014|201400191|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400191|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2e4e2f2fe3605c23", "measure_id": "201400191", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue funding that cannot be taken by the State to protect/maintain Concord\u2019s city services, including 911 response, police officers, gang prevention, crime investigation, neighborhood police patrols, city street/pothole repair, senior/youth programs, other city services, shall the City of Concord extend the existing voter-approved \u00bd cent sales tax for 9 years only, without increasing the current tax rate, including annual audits, independent citizens oversight, and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19921, "no_votes": 5694, "total_votes": 25615, "percent_yes": 77.77083739996095, "percent_no": 22.229162600039047, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.519088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.842340", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding that cannot be taken by the State to protect/maintain Concord\u2019s city services, including 911 response, police officers, gang prevention, crime investigation, neighborhood police patrols, city street/pothole repair, senior/youth programs, other city services, shall the City of Concord extend the existing voter-approved \u00bd cent sales tax for 9 years only, without increasing the current tax rate, including annual audits, independent citizens oversight, and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5068, "fingerprint": "2014|201400204|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400204|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "c4fe7e971bd2cbfa", "measure_id": "201400204", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue to protect/ maintain City services, including fire prevention/ emergency services; emergency response times; neighborhood police patrols;  irefighter/ police staffing; crime prevention/ investigation resources; after-school programs; library hours/ programs; senior services; open space, parks, paths/ playfields; other general City services, shall El Cerrito extend the existing voter-approved sales tax and set the future rate at one cent for 12 years, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying local, none to Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5791, "no_votes": 2416, "total_votes": 8207, "percent_yes": 70.56171560862678, "percent_no": 29.438284391373216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.519357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.842528", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to protect/ maintain City services, including fire prevention/ emergency services; emergency response times; neighborhood police patrols;  irefighter/ police staffing; crime prevention/ investigation resources; after-school programs; library hours/ programs; senior services; open space, parks, paths/ playfields; other general City services, shall El Cerrito extend the existing voter-approved sales tax and set the future rate at one cent for 12 years, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and all funds staying local, none to Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5069, "fingerprint": "2014|201400293|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400293|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ac543c1499cba8fa", "measure_id": "201400293", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted enacting a local half-cent transaction and use (sales) tax to maintain essential police and fire services, to prevent the reduction in maintenance of City parks and streets, and to prevent the reduction of youth, family and senior recreational services, subject to annual external audit and review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2249, "no_votes": 2189, "total_votes": 4438, "percent_yes": 50.67598017124831, "percent_no": 49.32401982875169, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.519638", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.842709", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted enacting a local half-cent transaction and use (sales) tax to maintain essential police and fire services, to prevent the reduction in maintenance of City parks and streets, and to prevent the reduction of youth, family and senior recreational services, subject to annual external audit and review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5070, "fingerprint": "2014|201400298|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400298|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201400298", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6117, "no_votes": 2663, "total_votes": 8780, "percent_yes": 69.66970387243737, "percent_no": 30.330296127562633, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.519904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.842890", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5071, "fingerprint": "2014|201400311|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400311|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "1410a32950502208", "measure_id": "201400311", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Richmond adopt a one-half cent transactions and use (sales) tax, to fund and maintain essential city services, such as public safety, public health and wellness programs, city youth programs and street paving?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10699, "no_votes": 8683, "total_votes": 19382, "percent_yes": 55.200701681972966, "percent_no": 44.799298318027034, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.520170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.843069", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Richmond adopt a one-half cent transactions and use (sales) tax, to fund and maintain essential city services, such as public safety, public health and wellness programs, city youth programs and street paving?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5078, "fingerprint": "2014|201400007|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400007|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "516ea7171929995b", "measure_id": "201400007", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Del Norte County Board of Supervisors adopt a Declaration of Support for the proposed separation from the State of California and formation of a new state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2424, "no_votes": 3367, "total_votes": 5791, "percent_yes": 41.85805560352271, "percent_no": 58.14194439647729, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.529252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.844567", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Del Norte County Board of Supervisors adopt a Declaration of Support for the proposed separation from the State of California and formation of a new state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5080, "fingerprint": "2014|201400195|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400195|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "201400195", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 431, "no_votes": 330, "total_votes": 761, "percent_yes": 56.63600525624178, "percent_no": 43.36399474375822, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.530435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.844931", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5079, "fingerprint": "2014|201400037|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400037|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "454c6a5eabcd02dc", "measure_id": "201400037", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Del Norte County Ordinance No. 2014-009 be approved? If approved, this ordinance will impose a County-wide special sales tax at the rate of of one quarter of one percent (0.25%) for a period of seven (7) years and require that all revenues be spent for the specific purpose of funding the Del Norte County Fairgrounds.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4828, "no_votes": 2392, "total_votes": 7220, "percent_yes": 66.86980609418282, "percent_no": 33.13019390581718, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.529791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.844747", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Del Norte County Ordinance No. 2014-009 be approved? If approved, this ordinance will impose a County-wide special sales tax at the rate of of one quarter of one percent (0.25%) for a period of seven (7) years and require that all revenues be spent for the specific purpose of funding the Del Norte County Fairgrounds.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5084, "fingerprint": "2014|201400008|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400008|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "94b6a4cac0bf2304", "measure_id": "201400008", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To continue current level of emergency medical and fire protection services, shall existing Fire Special Tax, set annually by the CSD Board, not to exceed $660 per unit, subject to maximum inflation adjustment of 1.5% per year, established as: Unimproved 0.5 unit; improved 1.0 unit; Stanford Sierra Camp 40 units: and shall Annual Appropriations Limit be extended four years to allow for expenditure of these and any subvention funds received from El Dorado County.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 37, "percent_yes": 75.67567567567568, "percent_no": 24.324324324324323, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.532903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.845670", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue current level of emergency medical and fire protection services, shall existing Fire Special Tax, set annually by the CSD Board, not to exceed $660 per unit, subject to maximum inflation adjustment of 1.5% per year, established as: Unimproved 0.5 unit; improved 1.0 unit; Stanford Sierra Camp 40 units: and shall Annual Appropriations Limit be extended four years to allow for expenditure of these and any subvention funds received from El Dorado County.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5081, "fingerprint": "2014|201400003|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400003|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "31da73c873205537", "measure_id": "201400003", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax in an amount of $365.00 on each parcel of real property be levied within Fernwood Cothrin Ranch Road Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2014/2015 to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services, to replace the current special tax?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 124, "no_votes": 136, "total_votes": 260, "percent_yes": 47.692307692307686, "percent_no": 52.307692307692314, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-05-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.530952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.845115", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax in an amount of $365.00 on each parcel of real property be levied within Fernwood Cothrin Ranch Road Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2014/2015 to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services, to replace the current special tax?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5085, "fingerprint": "2014|201400035|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400035|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "e1320713f64b0eab", "measure_id": "201400035", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Cameron Estates Community Services District levy a special tax for the purpose of providing vitally needed road improvements, upgrades, and increased road maintenance at an annual rate not to exceed an increase of $100 per year per parcel over and above the current rate, for a total not to exceed $350 per parcel per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 258, "no_votes": 147, "total_votes": 405, "percent_yes": 63.70370370370371, "percent_no": 36.29629629629629, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.533789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.845856", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Cameron Estates Community Services District levy a special tax for the purpose of providing vitally needed road improvements, upgrades, and increased road maintenance at an annual rate not to exceed an increase of $100 per year per parcel over and above the current rate, for a total not to exceed $350 per parcel per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5096, "fingerprint": "2014|201400535|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400535|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "46aba37eb3b95b80", "measure_id": "201400535", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Tahoe area schools with local funding that the State cannot take away, repair/replace roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, provide classrooms, science labs and technology meeting modern academic safety standards and providing a well-rounded education, construct, equip, repair, acquire school facilities/equipment to prepare students for college/high-demand jobs, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Tahoe-Truckee Unified School District issue $62,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with independent audits, citizens oversight, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140, "no_votes": 113, "total_votes": 253, "percent_yes": 55.33596837944664, "percent_no": 44.66403162055336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.540163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.847937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Tahoe area schools with local funding that the State cannot take away, repair/replace roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, provide classrooms, science labs and technology meeting modern academic safety standards and providing a well-rounded education, construct, equip, repair, acquire school facilities/equipment to prepare students for college/high-demand jobs, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Tahoe-Truckee Unified School District issue $62,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with independent audits, citizens oversight, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5095, "fingerprint": "2014|201400479|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400479|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "d551273adb8b52f3", "measure_id": "201400479", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade college facilities that prepare local students for jobs and university transfer by modernizing academic and job-training classrooms, science labs, and facilities, expanding access to university courses, creating a Public Safety Training Center, modernizing technology, improving safety and energy efficiency, and improving facilities, sites and equipment, shall Lake Tahoe Community College District issue $55,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds dedicated to Lake Tahoe Community College?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3643, "no_votes": 2723, "total_votes": 6366, "percent_yes": 57.2258875274898, "percent_no": 42.7741124725102, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.539807", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.847744", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade college facilities that prepare local students for jobs and university transfer by modernizing academic and job-training classrooms, science labs, and facilities, expanding access to university courses, creating a Public Safety Training Center, modernizing technology, improving safety and energy efficiency, and improving facilities, sites and equipment, shall Lake Tahoe Community College District issue $55,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds dedicated to Lake Tahoe Community College?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5082, "fingerprint": "2014|201400005|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400005|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "f7747caeeda80c1c", "measure_id": "201400005", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To replace the previous voter-approved expiring library special tax, shall El Dorado County levy the amount of $20.00 annually per parcel (with annual inflation adjustment not to exceed 3%) within County Service Area No. 10 Georgetown Divide Zone of Benefit, Zone G, for a period of twelve (12) years commencing in fiscal year 2015/16, to preserve continued funding for library services, hours, and operations and help avoid library closure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1868, "no_votes": 548, "total_votes": 2416, "percent_yes": 77.31788079470199, "percent_no": 22.682119205298008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.531628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.845302", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace the previous voter-approved expiring library special tax, shall El Dorado County levy the amount of $20.00 annually per parcel (with annual inflation adjustment not to exceed 3%) within County Service Area No. 10 Georgetown Divide Zone of Benefit, Zone G, for a period of twelve (12) years commencing in fiscal year 2015/16, to preserve continued funding for library services, hours, and operations and help avoid library closure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5093, "fingerprint": "2014|201400296|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400296|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "db7d0608e43a8f1f", "measure_id": "201400296", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and provide quality, safe streets and other public facilities, shall the City of Placerville enact a \u00bd cent sales tax, with citizen oversight and annual independent audits, to and after ten years, with all funds spent only in Placerville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1396, "no_votes": 1401, "total_votes": 2797, "percent_yes": 49.91061851984268, "percent_no": 50.08938148015732, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.538146", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.847370", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and provide quality, safe streets and other public facilities, shall the City of Placerville enact a \u00bd cent sales tax, with citizen oversight and annual independent audits, to and after ten years, with all funds spent only in Placerville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5094, "fingerprint": "2014|201400297|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400297|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "c7ca57bf52c7b7c1", "measure_id": "201400297", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Placerville\u2019s General Plan be amended to prohibit a roundabout or similar traffic features anywhere within the City limits of Placerville without approval of popular vote?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1648, "no_votes": 1182, "total_votes": 2830, "percent_yes": 58.233215547703175, "percent_no": 41.766784452296825, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.539149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.847557", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Placerville\u2019s General Plan be amended to prohibit a roundabout or similar traffic features anywhere within the City limits of Placerville without approval of popular vote?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5083, "fingerprint": "2014|201400006|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400006|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "4bb2b1c7c1c6a0dc", "measure_id": "201400006", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To replace the previous voter-approved expiring library special tax, shall El Dorado County levy the amount of $20.00 annually per parcel (with annual inflation adjustment not to exceed 3%) within County Service Area No. 10 South Lake Tahoe Zone of Benefit, Zone F, for a period of twelve (12) years commencing in fiscal year 2015/16, to preserve continued funding for library services, hours, and operations and help avoid library closure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3548, "no_votes": 869, "total_votes": 4417, "percent_yes": 80.32601313108445, "percent_no": 19.67398686891555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.532231", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.845490", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace the previous voter-approved expiring library special tax, shall El Dorado County levy the amount of $20.00 annually per parcel (with annual inflation adjustment not to exceed 3%) within County Service Area No. 10 South Lake Tahoe Zone of Benefit, Zone F, for a period of twelve (12) years commencing in fiscal year 2015/16, to preserve continued funding for library services, hours, and operations and help avoid library closure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5086, "fingerprint": "2014|201400038|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400038|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "5ff17984b01f2a6e", "measure_id": "201400038", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance, amending the County of El Dorado General Plan to provide (1) County shall not approve single-family housing subdivisions of five or more parcels if CalTrans determines that Highway 50 traffic has reached, or is forecast to reach, Level of Service F (2) lands designated open-space, agricultural, or natural resources shall remain in those categories and (3) lands designated as low-density residential, medium-density residential, or rural residential shall not be rezoned to higher density, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25074, "no_votes": 34055, "total_votes": 59129, "percent_yes": 42.40558778264472, "percent_no": 57.59441221735528, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.534527", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.846041", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance, amending the County of El Dorado General Plan to provide (1) County shall not approve single-family housing subdivisions of five or more parcels if CalTrans determines that Highway 50 traffic has reached, or is forecast to reach, Level of Service F (2) lands designated open-space, agricultural, or natural resources shall remain in those categories and (3) lands designated as low-density residential, medium-density residential, or rural residential shall not be rezoned to higher density, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5087, "fingerprint": "2014|201400039|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400039|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "89cc0e7be79a07a5", "measure_id": "201400039", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance, amending the County of El Dorado General Plan to extend the measure Y policies through 2025 and require the County to (1) emphasize improvements to local roadways when specifying expenditures in the Capital Improvement Program (2) rely first on state or federal funding for Highway 50 improvements (3) provide an annual report detailing traffic volumes and allocation of traffic impact mitigation fees and (4) encourage planning and zoning in Community Regions, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14240, "no_votes": 44148, "total_votes": 58388, "percent_yes": 24.38857299445091, "percent_no": 75.61142700554909, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.535039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.846231", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance, amending the County of El Dorado General Plan to extend the measure Y policies through 2025 and require the County to (1) emphasize improvements to local roadways when specifying expenditures in the Capital Improvement Program (2) rely first on state or federal funding for Highway 50 improvements (3) provide an annual report detailing traffic volumes and allocation of traffic impact mitigation fees and (4) encourage planning and zoning in Community Regions, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5088, "fingerprint": "2014|201400040|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400040|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "1907c9396d62b854", "measure_id": "201400040", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance, amending the County of El Dorado General Plan to (1) convert the communities of Camino, Pollock Pines, and Shingle Springs from Community Regions to Rural Centers, establish Cedar Grove as a Rural Center, and place the Platted Lands overlay on certain areas contiguous to those communities and (2) remove from the El Dorado Hills and Cameron Park Community Regions those Low Density Residential areas within one mile of Green Valley Road, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19420, "no_votes": 38453, "total_votes": 57873, "percent_yes": 33.556235204672305, "percent_no": 66.4437647953277, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.535521", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.846446", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance, amending the County of El Dorado General Plan to (1) convert the communities of Camino, Pollock Pines, and Shingle Springs from Community Regions to Rural Centers, establish Cedar Grove as a Rural Center, and place the Platted Lands overlay on certain areas contiguous to those communities and (2) remove from the El Dorado Hills and Cameron Park Community Regions those Low Density Residential areas within one mile of Green Valley Road, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5092, "fingerprint": "2014|201400136|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400136|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "b0007b3bb0417eae", "measure_id": "201400136", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of South Lake Tahoe repeal the paid parking program consisting of Ordinance Numbers 1049, 1051 and 1054, which repeal shall be effective August 31, 2014?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1705, "no_votes": 840, "total_votes": 2545, "percent_yes": 66.99410609037328, "percent_no": 33.00589390962672, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.537663", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.847182", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of South Lake Tahoe repeal the paid parking program consisting of Ordinance Numbers 1049, 1051 and 1054, which repeal shall be effective August 31, 2014?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5089, "fingerprint": "2014|201400041|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400041|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "63d6cfdea0f86128", "measure_id": "201400041", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall section 203 of the El Dorado County Charter, be amended in part, to allow the Board of Supervisors to consolidate the date set for an election to fill a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors with a scheduled primary, general, or special election, involving the district where the vacancy occurs, when the vacancy occurs more than 90 days but less than 180 days before the scheduled primary, general, or special election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36068, "no_votes": 16646, "total_votes": 52714, "percent_yes": 68.42205106802747, "percent_no": 31.57794893197253, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.536108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.846630", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 203 of the El Dorado County Charter, be amended in part, to allow the Board of Supervisors to consolidate the date set for an election to fill a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors with a scheduled primary, general, or special election, involving the district where the vacancy occurs, when the vacancy occurs more than 90 days but less than 180 days before the scheduled primary, general, or special election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5090, "fingerprint": "2014|201400042|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400042|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "2885584610bf9272", "measure_id": "201400042", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall section 206 of the El Dorado County Charter be amended to reflect current practice by replacing the words \u201cpresiding officer\u201d with \u201cChair\u201d and \u201cpresiding officer pro tem\u201d with \u201cVice Chair\u201d and \u201calternate presiding officer pro tem\u201d with \u201cSecond Vice Chair.\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34833, "no_votes": 16964, "total_votes": 51797, "percent_yes": 67.24906847886943, "percent_no": 32.75093152113057, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.536665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.846812", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 206 of the El Dorado County Charter be amended to reflect current practice by replacing the words \u201cpresiding officer\u201d with \u201cChair\u201d and \u201cpresiding officer pro tem\u201d with \u201cVice Chair\u201d and \u201calternate presiding officer pro tem\u201d with \u201cSecond Vice Chair.\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5091, "fingerprint": "2014|201400043|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400043|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "fed2b0e40801219c", "measure_id": "201400043", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall section 210 d. of the El Dorado County Charter be deleted from the Charter because it was repealed effective January 26, 2006, under the plain language of Charter section 210 d.?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39350, "no_votes": 11887, "total_votes": 51237, "percent_yes": 76.7999687725667, "percent_no": 23.2000312274333, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.537167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.847000", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 210 d. of the El Dorado County Charter be deleted from the Charter because it was repealed effective January 26, 2006, under the plain language of Charter section 210 d.?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5097, "fingerprint": "2014|201400009|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400009|FRESNO", "content_hash": "013ac61eeff9833a", "measure_id": "201400009", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the Fresno County Vehicle Abatement Program and vehicle registration fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles payable upon registration of a vehicle) be renewed for a ten\u2010year term beginning July 1, 2014, for the abatement and removal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51459, "no_votes": 50720, "total_votes": 102179, "percent_yes": 50.36162029379814, "percent_no": 49.63837970620186, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.540465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.848133", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Fresno County Vehicle Abatement Program and vehicle registration fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles payable upon registration of a vehicle) be renewed for a ten\u2010year term beginning July 1, 2014, for the abatement and removal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11319, "fingerprint": "2014|201400466|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400466|FRESNO", "content_hash": "bd36779b81a4aa7f", "measure_id": "201400466", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local schools by improving classrooms, vocational/agricultural job training and technology; fixing deteriorating roofs, bathrooms, plumbing/electrical systems; removing asbestos, mold/lead paint; improving fire safety; and constructing/equipping district facilities/sites. Shall Golden Plains Unified School District issue $13,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' alaries/pensions, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 396, "no_votes": 255, "total_votes": 651, "percent_yes": 60.82949308755761, "percent_no": 39.17050691244239, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.866685", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.546496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.850027", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local schools by improving classrooms, vocational/agricultural job training and technology; fixing deteriorating roofs, bathrooms, plumbing/electrical systems; removing asbestos, mold/lead paint; improving fire safety; and constructing/equipping district facilities/sites. Shall Golden Plains Unified School District issue $13,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' alaries/pensions, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5102, "fingerprint": "2014|201400388|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400388|FRESNO", "content_hash": "828015c129f37d9e", "measure_id": "201400388", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local schools by improving classrooms, vocational/agricultural job training and technology; fixing deteriorating roofs, bathrooms, plumbing/electrical systems; removing asbestos, mold/lead paint; improving fire safety; and constructing/equipping district facilities/sites shall Golden Plains Unified School District issue $13,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 192, "no_votes": 170, "total_votes": 362, "percent_yes": 53.03867403314917, "percent_no": 46.96132596685083, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.544036", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.849266", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local schools by improving classrooms, vocational/agricultural job training and technology; fixing deteriorating roofs, bathrooms, plumbing/electrical systems; removing asbestos, mold/lead paint; improving fire safety; and constructing/equipping district facilities/sites shall Golden Plains Unified School District issue $13,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5103, "fingerprint": "2014|201400392|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400392|FRESNO", "content_hash": "985a9ff9752d4ef7", "measure_id": "201400392", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; improve student access to computers and modern technology;  epair/replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue $13 million of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1287, "no_votes": 923, "total_votes": 2210, "percent_yes": 58.235294117647065, "percent_no": 41.764705882352935, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.544562", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.849457", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; improve student access to computers and modern technology;  epair/replace leaky roofs; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue $13 million of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5105, "fingerprint": "2014|201400491|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400491|FRESNO", "content_hash": "209cb2df16aa2d05", "measure_id": "201400491", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education without increasing the current tax rate; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall the Mendota Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 624, "no_votes": 157, "total_votes": 781, "percent_yes": 79.89756722151088, "percent_no": 20.102432778489117, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.547101", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.850209", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education without increasing the current tax rate; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; and repair or replace leaky roofs; shall the Mendota Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5101, "fingerprint": "2014|201400283|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400283|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a23e3d869636bcf4", "measure_id": "201400283", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Orange Cove establish a Special Tax for Police and Fire with an annual $95 parcel tax for single-family homes and specified amounts for multifamily, commercial, agricultural, and industrial parcels to improve public safety, response times, and training; maintain number of on-duty police officers; fight crime, drugs and gangs; and provide firefighting equipment; with revenues used only for Police and Fire; and subject to Citizen Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 780, "no_votes": 376, "total_votes": 1156, "percent_yes": 67.47404844290658, "percent_no": 32.52595155709342, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.542506", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.848896", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Orange Cove establish a Special Tax for Police and Fire with an annual $95 parcel tax for single-family homes and specified amounts for multifamily, commercial, agricultural, and industrial parcels to improve public safety, response times, and training; maintain number of on-duty police officers; fight crime, drugs and gangs; and provide firefighting equipment; with revenues used only for Police and Fire; and subject to Citizen Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11318, "fingerprint": "2014|201400402|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400402|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b659edc9c38da335", "measure_id": "201400402", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; increase student access to computers and modern technology; modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; and construct a cafeteria/multi\u2010purpose room at Parlier High School; shall the Parlier Unified School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 554, "no_votes": 286, "total_votes": 840, "percent_yes": 65.95238095238095, "percent_no": 34.04761904761905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.866296", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.545088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.849649", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; increase student access to computers and modern technology; modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; and construct a cafeteria/multi\u2010purpose room at Parlier High School; shall the Parlier Unified School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5100, "fingerprint": "2014|201400190|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400190|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d68de04fa6af8963", "measure_id": "201400190", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the safety and quality of life of the citizens of the City of Coalinga, shall the City enact a Utility Users Tax in the amount of 5.5%, with certain exemtions for businesses and low income seniors, with all revenues dedicated to finance public safety services such as law enforcement, fire protection, and emergency medical response?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1341, "no_votes": 523, "total_votes": 1864, "percent_yes": 71.94206008583691, "percent_no": 28.057939914163086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.541491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.848711", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the safety and quality of life of the citizens of the City of Coalinga, shall the City enact a Utility Users Tax in the amount of 5.5%, with certain exemtions for businesses and low income seniors, with all revenues dedicated to finance public safety services such as law enforcement, fire protection, and emergency medical response?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11320, "fingerprint": "2014|201400510|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400510|FRESNO", "content_hash": "60b610150ed9ba78", "measure_id": "201400510", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace outdated plumbing systems; increase student access to modern technology; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Pine Ridge Elementary School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money used for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 219, "no_votes": 213, "total_votes": 432, "percent_yes": 50.69444444444444, "percent_no": 49.30555555555556, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.867065", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.547696", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.850400", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace outdated plumbing systems; increase student access to modern technology; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Pine Ridge Elementary School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money used for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5104, "fingerprint": "2014|201400407|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400407|FRESNO", "content_hash": "60b610150ed9ba78", "measure_id": "201400407", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace outdated plumbing systems; increase student access to modern technology; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Pine Ridge Elementary School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money used for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 187, "no_votes": 178, "total_votes": 365, "percent_yes": 51.23287671232877, "percent_no": 48.76712328767123, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.545861", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.849841", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace outdated plumbing systems; increase student access to modern technology; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Pine Ridge Elementary School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money used for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11317, "fingerprint": "2014|201400290|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400290|FRESNO", "content_hash": "c6e2409d6d8c790b", "measure_id": "201400290", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain the current Parlier Police Department and Fire protection services, shall the City of Parlier be authorized to levy a parcel tax as set forth in Council Resolution 2014-44 for a period of 5 years and subject to an annual audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 793, "no_votes": 551, "total_votes": 1344, "percent_yes": 59.00297619047619, "percent_no": 40.99702380952381, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.865722", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.543177", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.849082", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the current Parlier Police Department and Fire protection services, shall the City of Parlier be authorized to levy a parcel tax as set forth in Council Resolution 2014-44 for a period of 5 years and subject to an annual audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5099, "fingerprint": "2014|201400113|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400113|FRESNO", "content_hash": "34c7312901a5382e", "measure_id": "201400113", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain the current Parlier Police Department and Fire protection services, shall the City of Parlier be authorized to levy a parcel tax as set forth in Council Resolution 2014\u201010 for a period of 5 years and subject to an annual audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 466, "no_votes": 260, "total_votes": 726, "percent_yes": 64.18732782369146, "percent_no": 35.81267217630854, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.541135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.848520", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the current Parlier Police Department and Fire protection services, shall the City of Parlier be authorized to levy a parcel tax as set forth in Council Resolution 2014\u201010 for a period of 5 years and subject to an annual audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5106, "fingerprint": "2014|201400544|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400544|FRESNO", "content_hash": "672c975814df1580", "measure_id": "201400544", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational software; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall West Hills Community College District issue $20,000,000 of short-term bonds with the interest rates at or below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator/teacher salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3190, "no_votes": 2043, "total_votes": 5233, "percent_yes": 60.95929677049493, "percent_no": 39.04070322950507, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.548271", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.850588", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational software; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall West Hills Community College District issue $20,000,000 of short-term bonds with the interest rates at or below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator/teacher salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5098, "fingerprint": "2014|201400044|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400044|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b7b750b16c02ac6d", "measure_id": "201400044", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To ensure the continuing success of Fresno Chaffee Zoo by providing necessary funding for repairs and maintenance, improved animal care, continuing the zoo\u2019s Species Survival and Children\u2019s Education Programs, maintaining low entrance fees, improving visitor amenities, and providing animals with safer more spacious natural habitats; shall Fresno County voters extend the existing 1/10th of one percent sales tax for ten additional years, with all proceeds exclusively for Fresno Chaffee Zoo?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 112377, "no_votes": 43427, "total_votes": 155804, "percent_yes": 72.12715976483274, "percent_no": 27.87284023516726, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.540759", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.848322", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure the continuing success of Fresno Chaffee Zoo by providing necessary funding for repairs and maintenance, improved animal care, continuing the zoo\u2019s Species Survival and Children\u2019s Education Programs, maintaining low entrance fees, improving visitor amenities, and providing animals with safer more spacious natural habitats; shall Fresno County voters extend the existing 1/10th of one percent sales tax for ten additional years, with all proceeds exclusively for Fresno Chaffee Zoo?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5107, "fingerprint": "2014|201400421|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400421|GLENN", "content_hash": "d6562cf670d5ca2c", "measure_id": "201400421", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken from the State; make health, safety, and handicapped accessibility improvements; upgrade inefficient heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; update classroom computers, instructional technology and infrastructure; and modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; shall Willows Unified School District issue $14 million of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1225, "no_votes": 1258, "total_votes": 2483, "percent_yes": 49.33548127265404, "percent_no": 50.66451872734596, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.549248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.850953", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken from the State; make health, safety, and handicapped accessibility improvements; upgrade inefficient heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; update classroom computers, instructional technology and infrastructure; and modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; shall Willows Unified School District issue $14 million of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5116, "fingerprint": "2014|201400391|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400391|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "c6ac303714e07c24", "measure_id": "201400391", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; increase student access to computers and modern technology; and improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Hydesville Elementary School District issue $1,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 244, "no_votes": 127, "total_votes": 371, "percent_yes": 65.76819407008087, "percent_no": 34.23180592991913, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.553320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.853022", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; increase student access to computers and modern technology; and improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Hydesville Elementary School District issue $1,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5117, "fingerprint": "2014|201400416|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400416|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "b6baf7d767bae2a6", "measure_id": "201400416", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair aging plumbing systems; and make health/safety improvements; shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 951, "no_votes": 797, "total_votes": 1748, "percent_yes": 54.40503432494279, "percent_no": 45.59496567505721, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.553594", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.853208", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair aging plumbing systems; and make health/safety improvements; shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5110, "fingerprint": "2014|201400104|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400104|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "f75a95f1fe3c643f", "measure_id": "201400104", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer continue to be appointed as they have since 1972?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 305, "no_votes": 153, "total_votes": 458, "percent_yes": 66.5938864628821, "percent_no": 33.4061135371179, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.551041", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.851698", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer continue to be appointed as they have since 1972?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5108, "fingerprint": "2014|201400045|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400045|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "2556ddb83b116c9e", "measure_id": "201400045", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the propagation, cultivation, raising or growing of genetically engineered organisms (also known as GMOs) in Humboldt County be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22733, "no_votes": 14426, "total_votes": 37159, "percent_yes": 61.17764202481229, "percent_no": 38.82235797518771, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.549918", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.851135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the propagation, cultivation, raising or growing of genetically engineered organisms (also known as GMOs) in Humboldt County be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5112, "fingerprint": "2014|201400210|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400210|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "5ffeba45691b3703", "measure_id": "201400210", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to extend a one-half of one percent (0.50%) supplemental transaction and use tax to fund essential services such as police, fire medical response, street maintenance, environmental programs, zoo, parks and recreation with the following restrictions? The supplemental transaction and use tax will expire after five years, unless reauthorized by the voters. A citizen's oversight committee shall be established to conduct annual audits of all expenditures generated by the tax to ensure fiscal accountability and public participation.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4751, "no_votes": 2382, "total_votes": 7133, "percent_yes": 66.60591616430675, "percent_no": 33.39408383569325, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.552016", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.852285", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to extend a one-half of one percent (0.50%) supplemental transaction and use tax to fund essential services such as police, fire medical response, street maintenance, environmental programs, zoo, parks and recreation with the following restrictions? The supplemental transaction and use tax will expire after five years, unless reauthorized by the voters. A citizen's oversight committee shall be established to conduct annual audits of all expenditures generated by the tax to ensure fiscal accountability and public participation.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5113, "fingerprint": "2014|201400211|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400211|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "d22d699f7cf2a27a", "measure_id": "201400211", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that (1) requires (a) payment of minimum wages in Eureka at $12.00 per hour for employers with 25 or more employees (including Welfare-to-Work Programs) with an annual increase, if any, based on the Consumer Price Index beginning at the ninetieth (90th) day after certification; (b) City Attorney enforcement through fines, penalties, or civil actions; (c) City Council authority to amend the ordinance with regard to implementation or enforcement; and (d) voter approval of substantive changes to the ordinance; and (2) allows private enforcement through civil actions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2796, "no_votes": 4389, "total_votes": 7185, "percent_yes": 38.91440501043841, "percent_no": 61.08559498956159, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.552305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.852475", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that (1) requires (a) payment of minimum wages in Eureka at $12.00 per hour for employers with 25 or more employees (including Welfare-to-Work Programs) with an annual increase, if any, based on the Consumer Price Index beginning at the ninetieth (90th) day after certification; (b) City Attorney enforcement through fines, penalties, or civil actions; (c) City Council authority to amend the ordinance with regard to implementation or enforcement; and (d) voter approval of substantive changes to the ordinance; and (2) allows private enforcement through civil actions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5118, "fingerprint": "2014|201400458|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400458|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "03e22405f4c931a9", "measure_id": "201400458", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade every school site and help improve education by; upgrading career technical/job training classrooms; investing in technology/science labs; repairing aging classrooms; qualifying local schools for matching state funds; and constructing/acquiring facilities, classrooms, sites and equipment, shall Eureka City Schools issue $49.75 million in bonds at legal rates, requiring Independent Citizens' Oversight, and annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries/pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8083, "no_votes": 6001, "total_votes": 14084, "percent_yes": 57.39136608917921, "percent_no": 42.60863391082079, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.553872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.853387", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade every school site and help improve education by; upgrading career technical/job training classrooms; investing in technology/science labs; repairing aging classrooms; qualifying local schools for matching state funds; and constructing/acquiring facilities, classrooms, sites and equipment, shall Eureka City Schools issue $49.75 million in bonds at legal rates, requiring Independent Citizens' Oversight, and annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries/pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5111, "fingerprint": "2014|201400171|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400171|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "283b018b5e021856", "measure_id": "201400171", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help ensure that the City of Blue Lake has the funds necessary to support the quality of life its residents have come to expect through such essential services as adequate law enforcement, park and recreation programs, and the maintenance and repair of local streets and public facilities, among others, shall the City place a four percent (4%) Utility Users Tax (Resolution No. 1033) on all electricity and gas usage in the City, beginning March 1, 2015, and automatically terminating five years later?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 230, "no_votes": 179, "total_votes": 409, "percent_yes": 56.234718826405874, "percent_no": 43.765281173594126, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.551578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.852087", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help ensure that the City of Blue Lake has the funds necessary to support the quality of life its residents have come to expect through such essential services as adequate law enforcement, park and recreation programs, and the maintenance and repair of local streets and public facilities, among others, shall the City place a four percent (4%) Utility Users Tax (Resolution No. 1033) on all electricity and gas usage in the City, beginning March 1, 2015, and automatically terminating five years later?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5115, "fingerprint": "2014|201400312|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400312|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "a70cfe8d3ea9179a", "measure_id": "201400312", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Rio Dell increase the sales tax by 1%, for five years only, providing locally controlled funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 376, "no_votes": 349, "total_votes": 725, "percent_yes": 51.86206896551724, "percent_no": 48.13793103448276, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.553041", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.852842", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Rio Dell increase the sales tax by 1%, for five years only, providing locally controlled funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5114, "fingerprint": "2014|201400216|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400216|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "33ddc95380f4d420", "measure_id": "201400216", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset state budget cuts and restore stability to Fortuna's state budget; maintain 9-1-1 emergency response services; restore cuts to police protection, gang/drug prevention, and road/sidewalk maintenance; support local businesses, the Fortuna Rodeo and AutoXpo; and maintain other essential general services, shall the City orf Fortuna establish a one cent sales tax, requiring independent annual financial audits and public review, with all funds remaining in Fortuna?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1131, "no_votes": 1966, "total_votes": 3097, "percent_yes": 36.5192121407814, "percent_no": 63.4807878592186, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.552723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.852661", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset state budget cuts and restore stability to Fortuna's state budget; maintain 9-1-1 emergency response services; restore cuts to police protection, gang/drug prevention, and road/sidewalk maintenance; support local businesses, the Fortuna Rodeo and AutoXpo; and maintain other essential general services, shall the City orf Fortuna establish a one cent sales tax, requiring independent annual financial audits and public review, with all funds remaining in Fortuna?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5119, "fingerprint": "2014|201400462|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400462|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ef433c2e4100ec73", "measure_id": "201400462", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; repair or replace leaky roofs; and improve student access to computers and modern technology, shall the Fortuna Elementary School District issue $9,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1602, "no_votes": 1988, "total_votes": 3590, "percent_yes": 44.62395543175487, "percent_no": 55.37604456824513, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.554204", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.853574", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; repair or replace leaky roofs; and improve student access to computers and modern technology, shall the Fortuna Elementary School District issue $9,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5121, "fingerprint": "2014|201400532|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400532|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "4059d9088b984e04", "measure_id": "201400532", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair aging plumbing systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; upgrade electrical systems; and make health/safety improvements; shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1604, "no_votes": 856, "total_votes": 2460, "percent_yes": 65.20325203252033, "percent_no": 34.796747967479675, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.554775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.853944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair/replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair aging plumbing systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; upgrade electrical systems; and make health/safety improvements; shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5120, "fingerprint": "2014|201400474|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400474|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "53ffc107ff61bb20", "measure_id": "201400474", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize, upgrade and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to modern technology, and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall the Jacoby Creek School District issue $2,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 640, "no_votes": 534, "total_votes": 1174, "percent_yes": 54.5144804088586, "percent_no": 45.4855195911414, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.554503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.853757", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize, upgrade and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to modern technology, and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall the Jacoby Creek School District issue $2,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5109, "fingerprint": "2014|201400046|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400046|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "f8d389ff0bca2089", "measure_id": "201400046", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain/improve essential services, such as 24-hour sheriff's patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response; crime investigation/prosecution; drug/illegal marijuana growhouse enforcement/prevention; services for abused children/mentally ill; rural fire protection; road repairs; and other County services, shall County of Humboldt pursuant to County Ordinance No. 2517 enact a 1/2% sales tax, for five years, all revenue for the County, none for the State of California, with annual audits and public review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20673, "no_votes": 16279, "total_votes": 36952, "percent_yes": 55.9455509850617, "percent_no": 44.0544490149383, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.550496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.851319", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/improve essential services, such as 24-hour sheriff's patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response; crime investigation/prosecution; drug/illegal marijuana growhouse enforcement/prevention; services for abused children/mentally ill; rural fire protection; road repairs; and other County services, shall County of Humboldt pursuant to County Ordinance No. 2517 enact a 1/2% sales tax, for five years, all revenue for the County, none for the State of California, with annual audits and public review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5122, "fingerprint": "2014|201400016|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400016|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "b0f53e47ec787faa", "measure_id": "201400016", "measure_letter": "E1", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Salton Community Services District be authorized to levy a special tax for Fire Protection/Emergency Medical Services for ten years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115, "no_votes": 162, "total_votes": 277, "percent_yes": 41.51624548736462, "percent_no": 58.48375451263538, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.555043", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.854128", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Salton Community Services District be authorized to levy a special tax for Fire Protection/Emergency Medical Services for ten years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11321, "fingerprint": "2014|201400017|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400017|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "dcfb3cc94c972bdc", "measure_id": "201400017", "measure_letter": "E2", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Salton Community Services District be authorized to increase its California Constitution Article XIII B appropriations limit for four years be increased by revenues from the special tax Fire Protection/Emergency Medical Services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 100, "no_votes": 165, "total_votes": 265, "percent_yes": 37.73584905660377, "percent_no": 62.26415094339623, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.870830", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.555317", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.854309", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Salton Community Services District be authorized to increase its California Constitution Article XIII B appropriations limit for four years be increased by revenues from the special tax Fire Protection/Emergency Medical Services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5124, "fingerprint": "2014|201400490|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400490|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "a987d660f33932c8", "measure_id": "201400490", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect the quality of educational facilities, increase access to computers and modern technology, enhance student safety, modernize outdated classrooms, construct a gymnasium/multipurpose facility for school aqnd community use, and qualify the District to receive State grants, shall McCabe Union Elementary School District by authorized to issue $7,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual financial and performance audits, and independent citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 780, "no_votes": 590, "total_votes": 1370, "percent_yes": 56.934306569343065, "percent_no": 43.065693430656935, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.555925", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.854674", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of educational facilities, increase access to computers and modern technology, enhance student safety, modernize outdated classrooms, construct a gymnasium/multipurpose facility for school aqnd community use, and qualify the District to receive State grants, shall McCabe Union Elementary School District by authorized to issue $7,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual financial and performance audits, and independent citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5123, "fingerprint": "2014|201400232|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400232|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "9cc07e744bbc6c57", "measure_id": "201400232", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Imperial Municipal code be amended in increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (a hotel bed tax paid when over eight visitors rent a room) from 8% to 10% to fund essential public services, maintain public areas and support quality of life activites and to maintain consistency with neighboring communities' hotel tax rates, effective January 1, 2015?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 936, "no_votes": 1079, "total_votes": 2015, "percent_yes": 46.45161290322581, "percent_no": 53.54838709677419, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.555627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.854492", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Imperial Municipal code be amended in increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (a hotel bed tax paid when over eight visitors rent a room) from 8% to 10% to fund essential public services, maintain public areas and support quality of life activites and to maintain consistency with neighboring communities' hotel tax rates, effective January 1, 2015?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5127, "fingerprint": "2014|201400400|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400400|KERN", "content_hash": "fdb8c12a4e01f973", "measure_id": "201400400", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for California students, modernize infrastructure and classroom technology, improve health and safety, and repay leases used to build Cal City High in order to reduce operating costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue up to $8,100,00 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight committee, and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 837, "no_votes": 690, "total_votes": 1527, "percent_yes": 54.813359528487226, "percent_no": 45.186640471512774, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.557029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.855228", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for California students, modernize infrastructure and classroom technology, improve health and safety, and repay leases used to build Cal City High in order to reduce operating costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue up to $8,100,00 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight committee, and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5126, "fingerprint": "2014|201400385|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400385|KERN", "content_hash": "7729c64f2cddaf63", "measure_id": "201400385", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; consturct new classrooms and science labs to maintain small class sizes; improve student access to computers and modern technology; improve P.E. fields and facilities; and replace deteriorating water, plumbing, and sewer systems; shall the Elk Hills School District issue $7,130,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries , regular, ongoing maintenance, or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19, "no_votes": 21, "total_votes": 40, "percent_yes": 47.5, "percent_no": 52.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.556490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.855046", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; consturct new classrooms and science labs to maintain small class sizes; improve student access to computers and modern technology; improve P.E. fields and facilities; and replace deteriorating water, plumbing, and sewer systems; shall the Elk Hills School District issue $7,130,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries , regular, ongoing maintenance, or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5129, "fingerprint": "2014|201400492|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400492|KERN", "content_hash": "bc3451e696e8ca00", "measure_id": "201400492", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for California City students, modernize infrastructure and classroom technology, improve heath and safety, and repay leases used to build Cal City High in order to reduce operating costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue up to $8,100,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a Citizen's Oversight committee, and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1551, "no_votes": 899, "total_votes": 2450, "percent_yes": 63.30612244897959, "percent_no": 36.69387755102041, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.557574", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.855586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for California City students, modernize infrastructure and classroom technology, improve heath and safety, and repay leases used to build Cal City High in order to reduce operating costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue up to $8,100,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a Citizen's Oversight committee, and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5130, "fingerprint": "2014|201400533|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400533|KERN", "content_hash": "904ebf4197b0e2fa", "measure_id": "201400533", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new elementary school, provide modern classrooms and career technical/support facilities at Rosamond High, construct new libraries and science labs, replace outdated portables with modern classrooms and technology throughout the District, improve student safety, and qualify for up to $44 million in State matching grants, shall the Southern Kern Unified School District be authorized to issue $28.4 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a Citizen's Oversight Committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1874, "no_votes": 1410, "total_votes": 3284, "percent_yes": 57.06455542021924, "percent_no": 42.93544457978076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.558302", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.855763", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new elementary school, provide modern classrooms and career technical/support facilities at Rosamond High, construct new libraries and science labs, replace outdated portables with modern classrooms and technology throughout the District, improve student safety, and qualify for up to $44 million in State matching grants, shall the Southern Kern Unified School District be authorized to issue $28.4 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a Citizen's Oversight Committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5128, "fingerprint": "2014|201400430|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400430|KERN", "content_hash": "2d36d58e6ec97cb3", "measure_id": "201400430", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair or replace aging Arvin K-8 school buildings with safe, modernized facilities, improve student safety and campus security, rehabilitate deteriorated roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, upgrade education technology, acquire, construct, repair, and equip schools, and provide all students access to the facilities and technology needed for success in high school/college/careers, shall Arvin Union School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight and all money dedicated to Arvin elementary/middle schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1114, "no_votes": 288, "total_votes": 1402, "percent_yes": 79.45791726105563, "percent_no": 20.542082738944373, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.557304", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.855405", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair or replace aging Arvin K-8 school buildings with safe, modernized facilities, improve student safety and campus security, rehabilitate deteriorated roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, upgrade education technology, acquire, construct, repair, and equip schools, and provide all students access to the facilities and technology needed for success in high school/college/careers, shall Arvin Union School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight and all money dedicated to Arvin elementary/middle schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5125, "fingerprint": "2014|201400350|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400350|KERN", "content_hash": "05c1867e23bcee69", "measure_id": "201400350", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding that stays in Tehachapi and cannot be seized by the State, to be used for increased street maintenance, improving senior services, enhancing public facilities, and improving other general city services, shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a temporary, one half of one percent sales tax for 10 years, with mandatory audits and annual community reporting?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 835, "no_votes": 973, "total_votes": 1808, "percent_yes": 46.18362831858407, "percent_no": 53.81637168141593, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.556192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.854858", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding that stays in Tehachapi and cannot be seized by the State, to be used for increased street maintenance, improving senior services, enhancing public facilities, and improving other general city services, shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a temporary, one half of one percent sales tax for 10 years, with mandatory audits and annual community reporting?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5131, "fingerprint": "2014|201400226|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400226|KINGS", "content_hash": "35135596cf201d7b", "measure_id": "201400226", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain/improve essential public safety and City services, including: Police and fire protection; Neighboorhood police patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response; Gangs, drugs, youth violence prevention; Property cirme investigation; Street paving/pothole repair; Park maintenance; and Other city serivces, Shall the City of Hanford enact a one-cent sales tax, for 20 years, with all revenue for City of Hanford, none for Sacramento, and subject ot independent annual audits and citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4620, "no_votes": 5983, "total_votes": 10603, "percent_yes": 43.57257379986796, "percent_no": 56.42742620013204, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.558987", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.855944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/improve essential public safety and City services, including: Police and fire protection; Neighboorhood police patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response; Gangs, drugs, youth violence prevention; Property cirme investigation; Street paving/pothole repair; Park maintenance; and Other city serivces, Shall the City of Hanford enact a one-cent sales tax, for 20 years, with all revenue for City of Hanford, none for Sacramento, and subject ot independent annual audits and citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5132, "fingerprint": "2014|201400010|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400010|LAKE", "content_hash": "4a59fba3217e6f07", "measure_id": "201400010", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article VI be added to Chapter 18 of the Lake County Code imposing a one-half of one per cent (0.50%) transaction and use tax (sales tax) to implement a Healthy Lake Tax for the County of Lake for a maximum period of ten (10) years with all revenues locked-in exclusively to combat aquatic weeds, algae, invasive mussels, and fund wet land restoration and water quality projects with an expenditure plan with citizen over sight for revenues generated?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9873, "no_votes": 5259, "total_votes": 15132, "percent_yes": 65.24583663758922, "percent_no": 34.75416336241078, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.596675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.856511", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article VI be added to Chapter 18 of the Lake County Code imposing a one-half of one per cent (0.50%) transaction and use tax (sales tax) to implement a Healthy Lake Tax for the County of Lake for a maximum period of ten (10) years with all revenues locked-in exclusively to combat aquatic weeds, algae, invasive mussels, and fund wet land restoration and water quality projects with an expenditure plan with citizen over sight for revenues generated?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5133, "fingerprint": "2014|201400011|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400011|LAKE", "content_hash": "2f26568ca8da9b58", "measure_id": "201400011", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall County Ordinance No. 2997 that proposes limits on indoor cultivation of medical marijuana to 100 square feet; prohibits outdoor cultivation within Community Growth Boundaries or on parcels smaller than 1 acre; allows outdoor cultivation of 6 mature or 12 immature plants on parcels larger than 1 acre; allows collective or cooperative organizations outdoor cultivation of up to 48 mature or 72 immature plants on Agriculture zoned property of at least 20 acres; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7835, "no_votes": 7352, "total_votes": 15187, "percent_yes": 51.590175808257065, "percent_no": 48.409824191742935, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.597026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.856698", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall County Ordinance No. 2997 that proposes limits on indoor cultivation of medical marijuana to 100 square feet; prohibits outdoor cultivation within Community Growth Boundaries or on parcels smaller than 1 acre; allows outdoor cultivation of 6 mature or 12 immature plants on parcels larger than 1 acre; allows collective or cooperative organizations outdoor cultivation of up to 48 mature or 72 immature plants on Agriculture zoned property of at least 20 acres; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5134, "fingerprint": "2014|201400047|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400047|LAKE", "content_hash": "5a4bcf7111041676", "measure_id": "201400047", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall 'The Medical Marijuana Control Act InitiativeMeasure' which seeks to repeal any then-existing County regulations contained in Article 72 of the Lake County Zoning Ordinance and to establish new regulations regarding the size, location, and manner in which medical marijuana may be cultivated in unincorporated areas of Lake County be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6674, "no_votes": 10606, "total_votes": 17280, "percent_yes": 38.622685185185176, "percent_no": 61.377314814814824, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.597320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.856879", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall 'The Medical Marijuana Control Act InitiativeMeasure' which seeks to repeal any then-existing County regulations contained in Article 72 of the Lake County Zoning Ordinance and to establish new regulations regarding the size, location, and manner in which medical marijuana may be cultivated in unincorporated areas of Lake County be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5135, "fingerprint": "2014|201400048|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400048|LAKE", "content_hash": "994002366e0ea159", "measure_id": "201400048", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall 'The Freedom to Garden Human Rights Restoration Act of 2014 Initiative Measure' which seeks to restore the natural human right to grow and use plants for the basic necessities of life and to exempt residents residing within the unincorporated areas of Lake County from any County permitting or other County ordinances that would limit an individual\u2019s outside and/or greenhouse home gardening efforts be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5904, "no_votes": 11326, "total_votes": 17230, "percent_yes": 34.2658154381892, "percent_no": 65.73418456181079, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.597608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.857061", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall 'The Freedom to Garden Human Rights Restoration Act of 2014 Initiative Measure' which seeks to restore the natural human right to grow and use plants for the basic necessities of life and to exempt residents residing within the unincorporated areas of Lake County from any County permitting or other County ordinances that would limit an individual\u2019s outside and/or greenhouse home gardening efforts be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5137, "fingerprint": "2014|201400186|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400186|LAKE", "content_hash": "7fc716be1da4dc84", "measure_id": "201400186", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Clearlake impose 0.5% retail transactions and use tax for citywide cleanup and improvement; shall appropriations limit for City code enforcement, crime suppression, abatement and animal control increase Fiscal Year 2014-2015 by tax proceeds received; shall Citizen's Oversight Committee annually review proceeds' use; shall tax sunset in ten years, with review and possible reduction of tax by City Council in five years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1412, "no_votes": 1231, "total_votes": 2643, "percent_yes": 53.424139235716986, "percent_no": 46.575860764283014, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.598267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.857439", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Clearlake impose 0.5% retail transactions and use tax for citywide cleanup and improvement; shall appropriations limit for City code enforcement, crime suppression, abatement and animal control increase Fiscal Year 2014-2015 by tax proceeds received; shall Citizen's Oversight Committee annually review proceeds' use; shall tax sunset in ten years, with review and possible reduction of tax by City Council in five years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5136, "fingerprint": "2014|201400049|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400049|LAKE", "content_hash": "f787ded8a226dd83", "measure_id": "201400049", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article VI be added to Chapter 18 of the Lake County Code imposing a one-half of one percent (0.50%) transaction and use tax (sales tax) to implement a Healthy Lake Tax for the County of Lake for a maximum period of ten (10) years with all revenues exclusively under Lake County Watershed Protection District control to combat aquatic weeds, algae, invasive mussels and fund wetland restoration and water quality projects with an expenditure plan with citizen oversight for revenues generated?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11037, "no_votes": 6308, "total_votes": 17345, "percent_yes": 63.63217065436725, "percent_no": 36.36782934563275, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.597958", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.857249", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article VI be added to Chapter 18 of the Lake County Code imposing a one-half of one percent (0.50%) transaction and use tax (sales tax) to implement a Healthy Lake Tax for the County of Lake for a maximum period of ten (10) years with all revenues exclusively under Lake County Watershed Protection District control to combat aquatic weeds, algae, invasive mussels and fund wetland restoration and water quality projects with an expenditure plan with citizen oversight for revenues generated?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5138, "fingerprint": "2014|201400480|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400480|LAKE", "content_hash": "c183c9cdd1fb6d16", "measure_id": "201400480", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that can not be taken by the State; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace outdated heating and air-conditioning systems; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and im prove/renovate the Westshore pool for school and community use; shall the Lakeport Unified School District issue $17,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2203, "no_votes": 1138, "total_votes": 3341, "percent_yes": 65.93834181382819, "percent_no": 34.06165818617181, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.598561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.857624", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that can not be taken by the State; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace outdated heating and air-conditioning systems; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and im prove/renovate the Westshore pool for school and community use; shall the Lakeport Unified School District issue $17,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5142, "fingerprint": "2014|201400070|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400070|LASSEN", "content_hash": "0a339968373ab188", "measure_id": "201400070", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an additional special tax be levied for fire protection equipment replacement and fire prevention programs for the Spalding Community Services District of $65.00 per assessor's parcel, as established in resolution 2014-1?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51, "no_votes": 87, "total_votes": 138, "percent_yes": 36.95652173913043, "percent_no": 63.04347826086957, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.599775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.858375", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an additional special tax be levied for fire protection equipment replacement and fire prevention programs for the Spalding Community Services District of $65.00 per assessor's parcel, as established in resolution 2014-1?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5139, "fingerprint": "2014|201400027|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400027|LASSEN", "content_hash": "058bc770251bb0b9", "measure_id": "201400027", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on February 10, 2014 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Lassen County ordering the formation of a Community Services District in the territory described, known as the Southern Cascades Community Services District, be approved? (NOTE: Formation of the District is contingent upon approval of an accompanying special tax measure.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 187, "no_votes": 123, "total_votes": 310, "percent_yes": 60.322580645161295, "percent_no": 39.677419354838705, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.598848", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.857818", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on February 10, 2014 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Lassen County ordering the formation of a Community Services District in the territory described, known as the Southern Cascades Community Services District, be approved? (NOTE: Formation of the District is contingent upon approval of an accompanying special tax measure.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5140, "fingerprint": "2014|201400028|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400028|LASSEN", "content_hash": "ca7f7c4a1c3ac3ca", "measure_id": "201400028", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted to assess a special tax of $65 per annum per parcel regardless of the size for up to two parcels owned by each unique landowner regardless of which county the parcels are located, the special tax will be assessed only if the Southern Cascades Community Services District is formed and shall be collected in the same manner as taxes on real property, commencing in the 2014-2015 fiscal year, with the revenue to be used for local ambulance, emergency medical response and training and any lawful purpose of the Southern Cascades Community Services District? (NOTE: Passage of a Special tax is required for the District to be formed.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 155, "no_votes": 118, "total_votes": 273, "percent_yes": 56.77655677655677, "percent_no": 43.22344322344323, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.599164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.858007", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted to assess a special tax of $65 per annum per parcel regardless of the size for up to two parcels owned by each unique landowner regardless of which county the parcels are located, the special tax will be assessed only if the Southern Cascades Community Services District is formed and shall be collected in the same manner as taxes on real property, commencing in the 2014-2015 fiscal year, with the revenue to be used for local ambulance, emergency medical response and training and any lawful purpose of the Southern Cascades Community Services District? (NOTE: Passage of a Special tax is required for the District to be formed.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5141, "fingerprint": "2014|201400050|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400050|LASSEN", "content_hash": "2b476ce43466ac73", "measure_id": "201400050", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2014-004 be enacted? (The Ordinance would limit to three the number of times a person can serve as a member of the Board of Supervisors in Lassen County. The Ordinance would only apply to persons that commence a term of office after January 1, 2015. The limitation applies regardless of whether the three terms were served consecutively or not. Likewise, if a person becomes a member ofthe Board of Supervisors as a result of a special election or appointment by the Governor, an only serves a partial term, they shall be deemed, for purposes of the Ordinance, to have served a full four year term if they have served more than two years.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4845, "no_votes": 1896, "total_votes": 6741, "percent_yes": 71.87360925678684, "percent_no": 28.126390743213165, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.599499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.858190", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2014-004 be enacted? (The Ordinance would limit to three the number of times a person can serve as a member of the Board of Supervisors in Lassen County. The Ordinance would only apply to persons that commence a term of office after January 1, 2015. The limitation applies regardless of whether the three terms were served consecutively or not. Likewise, if a person becomes a member ofthe Board of Supervisors as a result of a special election or appointment by the Governor, an only serves a partial term, they shall be deemed, for purposes of the Ordinance, to have served a full four year term if they have served more than two years.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11323, "fingerprint": "2014|201400110|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400110|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "755eb2f928705ff6", "measure_id": "201400110", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance that changes the General Plan and Zoning Map land use designation from a commercial zoning designation to a residential zoning designation and approves a Specific Plan for construction of single family detached homes on the property located at 2015 Potrero Grande Drive be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2268, "no_votes": 2081, "total_votes": 4349, "percent_yes": 52.14991952172914, "percent_no": 47.85008047827086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.876349", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.601912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.859686", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance that changes the General Plan and Zoning Map land use designation from a commercial zoning designation to a residential zoning designation and approves a Specific Plan for construction of single family detached homes on the property located at 2015 Potrero Grande Drive be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11322, "fingerprint": "2014|201400086|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400086|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bddc6d4fb600e450", "measure_id": "201400086", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "An Ordinance of the City of Long Beach, California, amending the Long Beach municipal code by adding section 3.80.261 relating to a marijuana business license general tax.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32068, "no_votes": 11374, "total_votes": 43442, "percent_yes": 73.8179641821279, "percent_no": 26.182035817872105, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-04-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.875593", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.600672", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.858957", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "An Ordinance of the City of Long Beach, California, amending the Long Beach municipal code by adding section 3.80.261 relating to a marijuana business license general tax.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5144, "fingerprint": "2014|201400085|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400085|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f254d05d5f70445d", "measure_id": "201400085", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the consolidated tax YES measure which; increases utility taxes on businesses by 2.5% and imposes a 2.5% utility tax on residents (both reduce by .5% after 3 years); increases transient occupancy taxes on lodging by 2%; reduces business license tax credits; and imposes a business license tax on commercially operated parking lots (except office visitor, employee, restaurant, hotel, theater, retail, and validated parking) for all City services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1402, "no_votes": 1841, "total_votes": 3243, "percent_yes": 43.23157570151095, "percent_no": 56.76842429848905, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-04-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.600387", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.858778", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the consolidated tax YES measure which; increases utility taxes on businesses by 2.5% and imposes a 2.5% utility tax on residents (both reduce by .5% after 3 years); increases transient occupancy taxes on lodging by 2%; reduces business license tax credits; and imposes a business license tax on commercially operated parking lots (except office visitor, employee, restaurant, hotel, theater, retail, and validated parking) for all City services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5163, "fingerprint": "2014|201400425|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400425|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6b291d7e1762197b", "measure_id": "201400425", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and equip classrooms and school facilities District-wide; increase student access to modern technology; expand career technical education facilities including science, technology, engineering and math; and replace roofs and outdated heating and air conditioning systems; shall ABC Unified School District be authorized to issue $195,200,000 of bonds, with interest rates within legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7591, "no_votes": 9679, "total_votes": 17270, "percent_yes": 43.95483497394325, "percent_no": 56.04516502605675, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.608527", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.863242", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and equip classrooms and school facilities District-wide; increase student access to modern technology; expand career technical education facilities including science, technology, engineering and math; and replace roofs and outdated heating and air conditioning systems; shall ABC Unified School District be authorized to issue $195,200,000 of bonds, with interest rates within legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11325, "fingerprint": "2014|201400273|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400273|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "870343c723900ae9", "measure_id": "201400273", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without raising current tax rates, shall an ordinance be adopted modernizing the City's utility users tax ordinance to require equal treatment of taxpayers by ensuring the tax applies regardless of technology used; exempting seniors, low-income disabled/blind residents; funding current gang prevention, youth, after-school, senior and disabled programs; neighborhood patrols/school crossing guards, pothole repairs, and other general services; subject to financial audits, local control of funds/no rate increase without voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7545, "no_votes": 3204, "total_votes": 10749, "percent_yes": 70.19257605358638, "percent_no": 29.80742394641362, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.877476", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.603796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.860771", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without raising current tax rates, shall an ordinance be adopted modernizing the City's utility users tax ordinance to require equal treatment of taxpayers by ensuring the tax applies regardless of technology used; exempting seniors, low-income disabled/blind residents; funding current gang prevention, youth, after-school, senior and disabled programs; neighborhood patrols/school crossing guards, pothole repairs, and other general services; subject to financial audits, local control of funds/no rate increase without voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5146, "fingerprint": "2014|201400102|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400102|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5a3df3ba6cc9379a", "measure_id": "201400102", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 702 of the Charter be amended to remove the requirement that the City shall provide for the staffing of the police and fire departments through its own staff and to remove the requirement that a two-thirds advisory vote is necessary before the City Council may consider alternative methods or agreements for providing police and fire services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1502, "no_votes": 7228, "total_votes": 8730, "percent_yes": 17.20504009163803, "percent_no": 82.79495990836197, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.601364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.859322", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 702 of the Charter be amended to remove the requirement that the City shall provide for the staffing of the police and fire departments through its own staff and to remove the requirement that a two-thirds advisory vote is necessary before the City Council may consider alternative methods or agreements for providing police and fire services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5153, "fingerprint": "2014|201400307|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400307|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ecc399109305df14", "measure_id": "201400307", "measure_letter": "BE", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 16.7 of Article XVI of the Redondo Beach Charter be amended to permit a person to serve up to three full terms as a member of the Board of Education by extending term limits from two to three terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5521, "no_votes": 9927, "total_votes": 15448, "percent_yes": 35.73925427239772, "percent_no": 64.26074572760228, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.604340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.861143", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 16.7 of Article XVI of the Redondo Beach Charter be amended to permit a person to serve up to three full terms as a member of the Board of Education by extending term limits from two to three terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5166, "fingerprint": "2014|201400447|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400447|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8c0ff2b5541435fb", "measure_id": "201400447", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update aging classrooms/buildings, prepare students/returning veterans for good-paying jobs/university transfer, repair deteriorating gas/sewer lines, electrical wiring/leaky roofs, improve classroom technology, handicapped accessibility, science labs, nursing, paralegal, automotive/other career education programs, upgrade campus safety/security, repair, construct/acquire facilities, sites/equipment, shall Compton Community College District issue $100 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent financial audits, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20209, "no_votes": 5570, "total_votes": 25779, "percent_yes": 78.39326583653362, "percent_no": 21.606734163466385, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.609620", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.863789", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update aging classrooms/buildings, prepare students/returning veterans for good-paying jobs/university transfer, repair deteriorating gas/sewer lines, electrical wiring/leaky roofs, improve classroom technology, handicapped accessibility, science labs, nursing, paralegal, automotive/other career education programs, upgrade campus safety/security, repair, construct/acquire facilities, sites/equipment, shall Compton Community College District issue $100 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent financial audits, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5162, "fingerprint": "2014|201400384|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400384|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b15ef689af3bc15f", "measure_id": "201400384", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade and repair Culver City schools and support quality education with funding that cannot be taken away by State government, shall Culver City Unified School District improve classrooms, science labs, computers/learning technology, repair leaking roofs, old plumbing, inadequate electrical systems, and aging school buildings/restrooms, improve school safety, remove hazardous asbestos, make needed seismic repairs, and upgrade, construct, and acquire classrooms, school facilities, sites/equipment, by issuing $106,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight and audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4706, "no_votes": 1463, "total_votes": 6169, "percent_yes": 76.28464905171016, "percent_no": 23.71535094828984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.608252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.863058", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and repair Culver City schools and support quality education with funding that cannot be taken away by State government, shall Culver City Unified School District improve classrooms, science labs, computers/learning technology, repair leaking roofs, old plumbing, inadequate electrical systems, and aging school buildings/restrooms, improve school safety, remove hazardous asbestos, make needed seismic repairs, and upgrade, construct, and acquire classrooms, school facilities, sites/equipment, by issuing $106,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight and audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5154, "fingerprint": "2014|201400308|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400308|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1bfc031a44efb75c", "measure_id": "201400308", "measure_letter": "CM", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 26 of Articles XXVI of the Redondo Beach Charter be amended to permit a person to serve up to three full terms as a Councilman, from any combination of districts, and up to three full terms as Mayor by extending term limits from two to three terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5244, "no_votes": 10488, "total_votes": 15732, "percent_yes": 33.33333333333333, "percent_no": 66.66666666666667, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.604658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.861324", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 26 of Articles XXVI of the Redondo Beach Charter be amended to permit a person to serve up to three full terms as a Councilman, from any combination of districts, and up to three full terms as Mayor by extending term limits from two to three terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5155, "fingerprint": "2014|201400309|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400309|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b608ba9b1e6b2442", "measure_id": "201400309", "measure_letter": "CT", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 11.1 of Article XI of the Redondo Beach Charter by amended by deleting the requirements that the City Treasurer shall devote his full time to the duties of the office and shall not engage in private business practice during City business hours; and adding new language to have the authority to audit all moneys collected by the City from any source in order to prepare monthly reports mandated by the Charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9970, "no_votes": 5796, "total_votes": 15766, "percent_yes": 63.237346187999485, "percent_no": 36.762653812000515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.604960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.861509", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 11.1 of Article XI of the Redondo Beach Charter by amended by deleting the requirements that the City Treasurer shall devote his full time to the duties of the office and shall not engage in private business practice during City business hours; and adding new language to have the authority to audit all moneys collected by the City from any source in order to prepare monthly reports mandated by the Charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5157, "fingerprint": "2014|201400335|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400335|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4e12df01b1e58345", "measure_id": "201400335", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Monica City Charter be amended to require the City to continue to operate the Santa Monica Airport in a manner that supports its aviation uses unless the voters approve the Airport's closure or change in use, and until that voter approval occurs, the city shall be prohibited from imposing additional restrictions on aviation support services to tenants and airport users that inhibit fuel sales or the full use of aviation facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10288, "no_votes": 14688, "total_votes": 24976, "percent_yes": 41.19154388212685, "percent_no": 58.80845611787315, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.605501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.861958", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Monica City Charter be amended to require the City to continue to operate the Santa Monica Airport in a manner that supports its aviation uses unless the voters approve the Airport's closure or change in use, and until that voter approval occurs, the city shall be prohibited from imposing additional restrictions on aviation support services to tenants and airport users that inhibit fuel sales or the full use of aviation facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5171, "fingerprint": "2014|201400485|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400485|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dbb07f74814257d5", "measure_id": "201400485", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Ada S. Nelson, Aeolian, and Rancho Santa Gertrudes elementary schools by repairing/updating aging classrooms; keeping schools safe and clean; providing upto- date learning technology for 21st century education; repairing leaky roofs/windows; removing asbestos, lead, other hazardous materials; and renovating, constructing, and equipping classrooms/facilities/sites; shall Los Nietos School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring strict accountability, Independent Citizens' Oversight, annual audits, with no fund for administrator salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1300, "no_votes": 386, "total_votes": 1686, "percent_yes": 77.1055753262159, "percent_no": 22.8944246737841, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.611106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.864700", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Ada S. Nelson, Aeolian, and Rancho Santa Gertrudes elementary schools by repairing/updating aging classrooms; keeping schools safe and clean; providing upto- date learning technology for 21st century education; repairing leaky roofs/windows; removing asbestos, lead, other hazardous materials; and renovating, constructing, and equipping classrooms/facilities/sites; shall Los Nietos School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring strict accountability, Independent Citizens' Oversight, annual audits, with no fund for administrator salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5175, "fingerprint": "2014|201400528|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400528|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4f43c7c2fb333d4e", "measure_id": "201400528", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local neighborhood elementary schools, by upgrading instructional technology, science labs libraries to modern academic standards; upgrading classrooms, school safety and security, repairing/replacing deteriorated roofs, lighting, and electrical systems where needed, and reducing water/energy use to save money, shall Saugus Union District issue $148,000,000 in bonds for School Facilities Improvement District No. 2014-1, at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying in our community benefiting local children grades K-6?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11878, "no_votes": 8473, "total_votes": 20351, "percent_yes": 58.36568227605523, "percent_no": 41.63431772394477, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.612560", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.865635", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local neighborhood elementary schools, by upgrading instructional technology, science labs libraries to modern academic standards; upgrading classrooms, school safety and security, repairing/replacing deteriorated roofs, lighting, and electrical systems where needed, and reducing water/energy use to save money, shall Saugus Union District issue $148,000,000 in bonds for School Facilities Improvement District No. 2014-1, at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying in our community benefiting local children grades K-6?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5158, "fingerprint": "2014|201400336|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400336|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "724aaee914cd2b37", "measure_id": "201400336", "measure_letter": "FS", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to establish a maximum annual registration fee of up to $288 per controlled rental unit and to limit the amount that landlords may pass through to tenants to 50% of the registration fee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12061, "no_votes": 11325, "total_votes": 23386, "percent_yes": 51.57359103737279, "percent_no": 48.42640896262721, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.606301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.862142", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to establish a maximum annual registration fee of up to $288 per controlled rental unit and to limit the amount that landlords may pass through to tenants to 50% of the registration fee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11327, "fingerprint": "2014|201400502|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400502|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1e99b4a27e9d2645", "measure_id": "201400502", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms, leaky roofs, upgrade school security, fencing, fire safety, update science, math, computer, lab technology, upgrade physical education/athletic facilities, remove asbestos, and repair, construct/ acquire educational facilities, sites/equipment to improve education at every school in Norwalk and La Mirada, shall Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District issue $375,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries or pensions, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8940, "no_votes": 6638, "total_votes": 15578, "percent_yes": 57.38862498395173, "percent_no": 42.61137501604827, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.882125", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.611999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.865245", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms, leaky roofs, upgrade school security, fencing, fire safety, update science, math, computer, lab technology, upgrade physical education/athletic facilities, remove asbestos, and repair, construct/ acquire educational facilities, sites/equipment to improve education at every school in Norwalk and La Mirada, shall Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District issue $375,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries or pensions, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5147, "fingerprint": "2014|201400105|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400105|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d06f9fc1f53699b1", "measure_id": "201400105", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to require that any vacancy occurring in the council, city clerk or city treasurer be filled by a majority vote of the council within 30 days or by calling a special election and such appointee shall serve for the remainder of the unexpired term if the term is up at the next general municipal election, and if not, and time for nominations has not yet commenced, then stand for election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10491, "no_votes": 4840, "total_votes": 15331, "percent_yes": 68.42997847498532, "percent_no": 31.57002152501468, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.601640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.859503", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to require that any vacancy occurring in the council, city clerk or city treasurer be filled by a majority vote of the council within 30 days or by calling a special election and such appointee shall serve for the remainder of the unexpired term if the term is up at the next general municipal election, and if not, and time for nominations has not yet commenced, then stand for election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5159, "fingerprint": "2014|201400337|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400337|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d3127c5ea49d780a", "measure_id": "201400337", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that amends the real estate transfer tax so that for commercial and non-commercial real estate sold for one million dollars or more, the tax rate would be $9 for each thousand dollars of sales price?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10364, "no_votes": 14020, "total_votes": 24384, "percent_yes": 42.503280839895005, "percent_no": 57.496719160104995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.606941", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.862324", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that amends the real estate transfer tax so that for commercial and non-commercial real estate sold for one million dollars or more, the tax rate would be $9 for each thousand dollars of sales price?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5160, "fingerprint": "2014|201400338|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400338|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2b28a770ddd6558c", "measure_id": "201400338", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the proposed transfer tax on commercial and non-commercial real estate sales is approved by voters, should the revenue be used to preserve, repair, renovate and construct affordable housing for low-income people who work or live in Santa Monica, including seniors, veterans, working families and persons with disabilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12179, "no_votes": 11923, "total_votes": 24102, "percent_yes": 50.5310762592316, "percent_no": 49.4689237407684, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.607337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.862504", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the proposed transfer tax on commercial and non-commercial real estate sales is approved by voters, should the revenue be used to preserve, repair, renovate and construct affordable housing for low-income people who work or live in Santa Monica, including seniors, veterans, working families and persons with disabilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5169, "fingerprint": "2014|201400465|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400465|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "080182cc17b4510a", "measure_id": "201400465", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Buena Park, Fullerton Union, La Habra, Sonora, Sunny Hills, and Troy High Schools, and prepare students for college and careers shall the Fullerton Joint Union High School District upgrade classrooms, science labs, sites, facilities; repair roofs, floors, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; improve student safety and security; upgrade career training facilities and technology infrastructure be issuing $175 million in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, independent oversight, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2158, "no_votes": 1747, "total_votes": 3905, "percent_yes": 55.262483994878366, "percent_no": 44.737516005121634, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.610446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.864331", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Buena Park, Fullerton Union, La Habra, Sonora, Sunny Hills, and Troy High Schools, and prepare students for college and careers shall the Fullerton Joint Union High School District upgrade classrooms, science labs, sites, facilities; repair roofs, floors, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; improve student safety and security; upgrade career training facilities and technology infrastructure be issuing $175 million in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, independent oversight, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5173, "fingerprint": "2014|201400501|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400501|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "238c4a43ac09d1c8", "measure_id": "201400501", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade nursing, science, technology, engineering, math/technical job training facilities, repair decaying walls/leaky roofs, update outdated computer technology, fire safety/electrical systems, ensure disabled accessibility, repair, construct, acquire facilities, sites/equipment so local students/returning veterans are prepared for universities/jobs, shall North Orange County Community College District issue $574,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with audits, oversight and NO money for administrators' salaries, pensions or Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2029, "no_votes": 1918, "total_votes": 3947, "percent_yes": 51.406131238915634, "percent_no": 48.593868761084366, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.611656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.865065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade nursing, science, technology, engineering, math/technical job training facilities, repair decaying walls/leaky roofs, update outdated computer technology, fire safety/electrical systems, ensure disabled accessibility, repair, construct, acquire facilities, sites/equipment so local students/returning veterans are prepared for universities/jobs, shall North Orange County Community College District issue $574,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with audits, oversight and NO money for administrators' salaries, pensions or Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5164, "fingerprint": "2014|201400432|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400432|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "21ddc2baadf8db2d", "measure_id": "201400432", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local school facilities; make health and safety improvements; replace leaky roofs; upgrade electrical systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Azusa Unified School District issue $[92,000,000] of bonds, at legal rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money used for administrative salaries and all funds controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3983, "no_votes": 3099, "total_votes": 7082, "percent_yes": 56.241174809375885, "percent_no": 43.758825190624115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.608932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.863427", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local school facilities; make health and safety improvements; replace leaky roofs; upgrade electrical systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Azusa Unified School District issue $[92,000,000] of bonds, at legal rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, NO money used for administrative salaries and all funds controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5176, "fingerprint": "2014|201400529|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400529|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1294933248f289ef", "measure_id": "201400529", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade outdated classrooms, science labs, career/vocational educational facilities; improve school security/drinking water/fire safety systems; repair electrical wiring, leaky roofs, plumbing and bathrooms; replace old portables; repair, construct, acquire educational facilities, sites/equipment, shall Snowline Joint Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, no money for administrators' salaries, and requiring all funds be used locally for Snowline schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18, "no_votes": 32, "total_votes": 50, "percent_yes": 36.0, "percent_no": 64.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.612834", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.865826", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade outdated classrooms, science labs, career/vocational educational facilities; improve school security/drinking water/fire safety systems; repair electrical wiring, leaky roofs, plumbing and bathrooms; replace old portables; repair, construct, acquire educational facilities, sites/equipment, shall Snowline Joint Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring independent audits, Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, no money for administrators' salaries, and requiring all funds be used locally for Snowline schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11326, "fingerprint": "2014|201400368|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400368|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6988165fbd306255", "measure_id": "201400368", "measure_letter": "LC", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality La Ca\u00f1ada schools with funds the State cannot take; continue  advanced academic programs in math/science/technology; attract/retain qualified teachers; maintain manageable class sizes; and prepare students for top  colleges/careers, shall La Ca\u00f1ada Unified School District renew the expiring annual school parcel tax and increase the rate by $300 (as described in the ballot pamphlet) for  seven years, with exemptions for seniors, independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries and funds under local control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3810, "no_votes": 1783, "total_votes": 5593, "percent_yes": 68.12086536742356, "percent_no": 31.879134632576438, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-03-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.879637", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.607960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.862871", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality La Ca\u00f1ada schools with funds the State cannot take; continue  advanced academic programs in math/science/technology; attract/retain qualified teachers; maintain manageable class sizes; and prepare students for top  colleges/careers, shall La Ca\u00f1ada Unified School District renew the expiring annual school parcel tax and increase the rate by $300 (as described in the ballot pamphlet) for  seven years, with exemptions for seniors, independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries and funds under local control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5161, "fingerprint": "2014|201400339|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400339|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4c38c849b62b4a3a", "measure_id": "201400339", "measure_letter": "LC", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: (1) prohibit new development on Airport land, except for parks, public open spaces and public recreational facilities, until the voters approve limits on the uses and development that may occur on the land; and (2) affirm the City Council\u2019s authority to manage the Airport and to close all or part of it?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15434, "no_votes": 10096, "total_votes": 25530, "percent_yes": 60.45436741088916, "percent_no": 39.54563258911084, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.607668", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.862684", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: (1) prohibit new development on Airport land, except for parks, public open spaces and public recreational facilities, until the voters approve limits on the uses and development that may occur on the land; and (2) affirm the City Council\u2019s authority to manage the Airport and to close all or part of it?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5168, "fingerprint": "2014|201400455|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400455|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b31e880d836bbbd3", "measure_id": "201400455", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade schools and improve the quality of education and ensure safe school campuses, upgrade classroom technology to meet current teaching standards, shall El Monte City School District repair, acquire, construct, equip classrooms, sites and facilities, complete safety and energy-efficiency upgrades, replace aging roofs, heating, electrical, cooling systems, upgrade technology/add new computer labs, by issuing $78,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds benefiting local elementary schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4614, "no_votes": 2263, "total_votes": 6877, "percent_yes": 67.0932092482187, "percent_no": 32.9067907517813, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.610173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.864150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade schools and improve the quality of education and ensure safe school campuses, upgrade classroom technology to meet current teaching standards, shall El Monte City School District repair, acquire, construct, equip classrooms, sites and facilities, complete safety and energy-efficiency upgrades, replace aging roofs, heating, electrical, cooling systems, upgrade technology/add new computer labs, by issuing $78,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds benefiting local elementary schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5172, "fingerprint": "2014|201400486|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400486|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cb853d4158894a89", "measure_id": "201400486", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and improve Los Nietos Middle School by updating aging middle school classrooms/labs with 21st century learning technology; providing educational resources to prepare students to successfully transition to high school and college; improving facilities for Science, Technology, Engineering and Math programs; renovating, constructing, and equipping classrooms/facilities/sites; shall Los Nietos School District issue $13,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring strict accountability, Independent Citizens' Oversight, annual audits, with no funds for administrator salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1285, "no_votes": 383, "total_votes": 1668, "percent_yes": 77.03836930455635, "percent_no": 22.961630695443645, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.611381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.864881", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and improve Los Nietos Middle School by updating aging middle school classrooms/labs with 21st century learning technology; providing educational resources to prepare students to successfully transition to high school and college; improving facilities for Science, Technology, Engineering and Math programs; renovating, constructing, and equipping classrooms/facilities/sites; shall Los Nietos School District issue $13,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring strict accountability, Independent Citizens' Oversight, annual audits, with no funds for administrator salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5167, "fingerprint": "2014|201400452|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400452|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d8ea0644061136f3", "measure_id": "201400452", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, improve education for each student by upgrading science labs for 21st Century technology and career/vocational training, improve school security/fire safety, repair old restrooms and plumbing, improve disabled access, electrical systems/wiring, and repair, construct, and acquire educational facilities, sites, and equipment, shall Downey Unified School District issue $248,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, for administrators' salaries/pensions, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10093, "no_votes": 6221, "total_votes": 16314, "percent_yes": 61.867108005394144, "percent_no": 38.132891994605856, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.609900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.863970", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, improve education for each student by upgrading science labs for 21st Century technology and career/vocational training, improve school security/fire safety, repair old restrooms and plumbing, improve disabled access, electrical systems/wiring, and repair, construct, and acquire educational facilities, sites, and equipment, shall Downey Unified School District issue $248,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, for administrators' salaries/pensions, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5143, "fingerprint": "2014|201400051|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400051|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3827a614b699295f", "measure_id": "201400051", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To ensure continued funding from an expiring voter-approved measure for improving the safety of neighborhood parks and senior/youth recreation areas; assisting in gang prevention; protecting rivers, beaches, water sources; repairing, acquiring/preserving parks/natural areas; maintaining zoos, museums; providing youth job-training, shall Los Angeles County levy an annual $23/parcel special tax, requiring annual independent financial audits and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 862224, "no_votes": 508672, "total_votes": 1370896, "percent_yes": 62.89492419556261, "percent_no": 37.10507580443739, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.600082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.858589", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure continued funding from an expiring voter-approved measure for improving the safety of neighborhood parks and senior/youth recreation areas; assisting in gang prevention; protecting rivers, beaches, water sources; repairing, acquiring/preserving parks/natural areas; maintaining zoos, museums; providing youth job-training, shall Los Angeles County levy an annual $23/parcel special tax, requiring annual independent financial audits and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5152, "fingerprint": "2014|201400300|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400300|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "de21538b6c641983", "measure_id": "201400300", "measure_letter": "PPL", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide revenue dedicated solely for the Pomona Public Library, shall $42.00 per parcel be assessed commencing 7/1/2015? Restores Library hours to 38 hours/week minimum and provides for professional staff. Assessment expires in 10 years. Revenue raised is additional to monies from City's General Fund. Ensures City's annual contribution to Library remains no less than current general fund allocations. Revenue use is subject to annual audit and citizen oversight", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6829, "no_votes": 6936, "total_votes": 13765, "percent_yes": 49.61133309117326, "percent_no": 50.38866690882674, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.604070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.860958", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide revenue dedicated solely for the Pomona Public Library, shall $42.00 per parcel be assessed commencing 7/1/2015? Restores Library hours to 38 hours/week minimum and provides for professional staff. Assessment expires in 10 years. Revenue raised is additional to monies from City's General Fund. Ensures City's annual contribution to Library remains no less than current general fund allocations. Revenue use is subject to annual audit and citizen oversight", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5170, "fingerprint": "2014|201400471|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400471|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b6b7d1ff4445cd64", "measure_id": "201400471", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce student overcrowding by reopening a school and to make safety, security, and health improvements; modernize, repair, construct, equip and upgrade classrooms and other school facilities; replace aging roofs; provide technology improvements for students; and upgrade/replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems, shall Hermosa Beach City School District issue $54,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrative salaries and no funds taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3283, "no_votes": 2744, "total_votes": 6027, "percent_yes": 54.47154471544715, "percent_no": 45.52845528455285, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.610828", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.864519", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce student overcrowding by reopening a school and to make safety, security, and health improvements; modernize, repair, construct, equip and upgrade classrooms and other school facilities; replace aging roofs; provide technology improvements for students; and upgrade/replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems, shall Hermosa Beach City School District issue $54,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrative salaries and no funds taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5151, "fingerprint": "2014|201400250|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400250|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7deb541c12f8c21a", "measure_id": "201400250", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that (1) requires voter-approved specific plans for commercial and commercial-residential projects over 20,000 square feet; and (2) allows formula retail businesses in tenant spaces between 1400sf and 5000sf in existing civic center shopping centers but imposes stricter requirements (including 2500sf limit per business and limit of 30% of shopping center's tenants) on some such businesses in any new shopping center or existing ones outside the civic center?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2698, "no_votes": 1830, "total_votes": 4528, "percent_yes": 59.58480565371025, "percent_no": 40.41519434628975, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.603473", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.860592", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that (1) requires voter-approved specific plans for commercial and commercial-residential projects over 20,000 square feet; and (2) allows formula retail businesses in tenant spaces between 1400sf and 5000sf in existing civic center shopping centers but imposes stricter requirements (including 2500sf limit per business and limit of 30% of shopping center's tenants) on some such businesses in any new shopping center or existing ones outside the civic center?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5174, "fingerprint": "2014|201400517|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400517|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "afcb6662124b3e24", "measure_id": "201400517", "measure_letter": "RS", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve schools by repairing deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms and plumbing; leaky roofs/windows; removing asbestos/lead paint; upgrading school security/ fire safety; upgrading classroom technology/science labs; and repairing, constructing, and acquiring educational facilities, sites, and equipment; shall Rosemead School District issue 30 million dollars in bonds, at legal rates, requiring annual independent financial audits and independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries and pensions, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1635, "no_votes": 648, "total_votes": 2283, "percent_yes": 71.61629434954008, "percent_no": 28.383705650459916, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.612287", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.865431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve schools by repairing deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms and plumbing; leaky roofs/windows; removing asbestos/lead paint; upgrading school security/ fire safety; upgrading classroom technology/science labs; and repairing, constructing, and acquiring educational facilities, sites, and equipment; shall Rosemead School District issue 30 million dollars in bonds, at legal rates, requiring annual independent financial audits and independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries and pensions, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5156, "fingerprint": "2014|201400333|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400333|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8b18a0ccadf9c9cc", "measure_id": "201400333", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 14-02 adopting a Development Agreement with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (METRO) for the removal of 62 advertising structures, within the City, by METRO or any other means, and construction and operation of the three digital billboards, adjacent to the Interstate 5 and State Route 14 freeways, and the dedication to the City of revenue received from digital billboards, which creates an ongoing revenue stream, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17166, "no_votes": 21488, "total_votes": 38654, "percent_yes": 44.40937548507269, "percent_no": 55.59062451492731, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.605231", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.861696", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 14-02 adopting a Development Agreement with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (METRO) for the removal of 62 advertising structures, within the City, by METRO or any other means, and construction and operation of the three digital billboards, adjacent to the Interstate 5 and State Route 14 freeways, and the dedication to the City of revenue received from digital billboards, which creates an ongoing revenue stream, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5177, "fingerprint": "2014|201400538|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400538|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ac6a02bbeaf1588f", "measure_id": "201400538", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms and science labs, improve technology, make student safety and security improvements, provide emergency safety and disaster equipment, repair roofs and plumbing, install low-water-usage irrigation systems, renovate or build facilities as needed, including high school auditoriums and auxiliary gyms, shall Torrance Unified School District issue $144.3 million in bonds under a no-tax-rate-increase financing plan, at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21424, "no_votes": 10689, "total_votes": 32113, "percent_yes": 66.71441472300937, "percent_no": 33.28558527699063, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.613187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.866009", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms and science labs, improve technology, make student safety and security improvements, provide emergency safety and disaster equipment, repair roofs and plumbing, install low-water-usage irrigation systems, renovate or build facilities as needed, including high school auditoriums and auxiliary gyms, shall Torrance Unified School District issue $144.3 million in bonds under a no-tax-rate-increase financing plan, at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11328, "fingerprint": "2014|201400539|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400539|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "63fd18d1d02ceb3a", "measure_id": "201400539", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair playgrounds and playfields to meet current health and safety standards, improve physical education facilities and restrooms, construct an aquatic facility to serve students and the community, and renovate and replace playgrounds and fields, shall Torrance Unified School District issue $50 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19877, "no_votes": 12138, "total_votes": 32015, "percent_yes": 62.08652194283929, "percent_no": 37.91347805716071, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.883066", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.613476", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.866189", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair playgrounds and playfields to meet current health and safety standards, improve physical education facilities and restrooms, construct an aquatic facility to serve students and the community, and renovate and replace playgrounds and fields, shall Torrance Unified School District issue $50 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5148, "fingerprint": "2014|201400135|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400135|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7c110f510d447998", "measure_id": "201400135", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the proposed citizens initiative Requiring 2/3 Vote For All Taxes, Assessments And Fees; Expiration Of Taxes and Fees Within 10 Years, Assessments Within 20 Years; Requiring Bond Repayment In 20 Years Initiative Charter Amendment be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 490, "no_votes": 935, "total_votes": 1425, "percent_yes": 34.3859649122807, "percent_no": 65.6140350877193, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.602275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.859869", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the proposed citizens initiative Requiring 2/3 Vote For All Taxes, Assessments And Fees; Expiration Of Taxes and Fees Within 10 Years, Assessments Within 20 Years; Requiring Bond Repayment In 20 Years Initiative Charter Amendment be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5145, "fingerprint": "2014|201400088|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400088|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "66bd3105d25272d4", "measure_id": "201400088", "measure_letter": "UUT", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain City services, such as Public Safety, Paramedic and Library services, shall an Ordinance be adopted to: 1. Extend the City's current 10% Utility User Tax at a maximum of 10% for all utilities except water and sewer; 2. Establish new sunset dates starting July 1, 2022; 3. Extend the current 9% water and sewer tax until July 1, 2014, when it will reduce to 7%, and then to 6% on July 1, 2015?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1296, "no_votes": 1372, "total_votes": 2668, "percent_yes": 48.57571214392803, "percent_no": 51.42428785607197, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-04-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.601059", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.859139", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain City services, such as Public Safety, Paramedic and Library services, shall an Ordinance be adopted to: 1. Extend the City's current 10% Utility User Tax at a maximum of 10% for all utilities except water and sewer; 2. Establish new sunset dates starting July 1, 2022; 3. Extend the current 9% water and sewer tax until July 1, 2014, when it will reduce to 7%, and then to 6% on July 1, 2015?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5165, "fingerprint": "2014|201400433|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400433|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fae4a7ccba485f67", "measure_id": "201400433", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve school facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the State, replace leaky roofs, improve student access to computer / modern technology, replace / upgrade outdated heating, air conditioning, electrical systems, modernize outdated classrooms and restrooms, acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, sites and equipment, shall Bassett Unified School District issue $30 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint an independent citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher or administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1616, "no_votes": 973, "total_votes": 2589, "percent_yes": 62.41792197759752, "percent_no": 37.58207802240248, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.609235", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.863608", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve school facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the State, replace leaky roofs, improve student access to computer / modern technology, replace / upgrade outdated heating, air conditioning, electrical systems, modernize outdated classrooms and restrooms, acquire, construct, repair classrooms, facilities, sites and equipment, shall Bassett Unified School District issue $30 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint an independent citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher or administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11324, "fingerprint": "2014|201400184|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400184|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "53ebee4b96b7b107", "measure_id": "201400184", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Claremont be authorized to issue water revenue bonds up to $135 million to pay for acquisition of the Claremont Water System and incidental expenses payable only from the water system's revenue?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7596, "no_votes": 2957, "total_votes": 10553, "percent_yes": 71.9795318866673, "percent_no": 28.020468113332697, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.877106", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.603200", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.860413", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Claremont be authorized to issue water revenue bonds up to $135 million to pay for acquisition of the Claremont Water System and incidental expenses payable only from the water system's revenue?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5149, "fingerprint": "2014|201400140|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400140|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1466c398f73545cc", "measure_id": "201400140", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 3011 be approved to amend the City Charter to require the City Council to establish four equal, geographically based districts from which council members will be elected by residents of those districts to serve four year terms, and to establish a citywide elected mayor position to serve a two year term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3772, "no_votes": 3432, "total_votes": 7204, "percent_yes": 52.35980011104942, "percent_no": 47.64019988895058, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.602575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.860048", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 3011 be approved to amend the City Charter to require the City Council to establish four equal, geographically based districts from which council members will be elected by residents of those districts to serve four year terms, and to establish a citywide elected mayor position to serve a two year term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5150, "fingerprint": "2014|201400157|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400157|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1fc6f1319656570b", "measure_id": "201400157", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Artesia Public Safety, Parks, and General City Services Ordinance be adopted to enact a general purpose utility user tax at a rate of 4.9% for charges made for certain utility services, to provide funding for general fund purposes, including, without limitation, 9-1-1 response, crime/gang prevention, and neighborhood police patrols; community center improvements for teen, after-school recreation and senior programs; neighborhood streets, alleys, potholes sidewalks and roads; and other general City services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 791, "no_votes": 1278, "total_votes": 2069, "percent_yes": 38.23102948284195, "percent_no": 61.76897051715805, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.602902", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.860231", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Artesia Public Safety, Parks, and General City Services Ordinance be adopted to enact a general purpose utility user tax at a rate of 4.9% for charges made for certain utility services, to provide funding for general fund purposes, including, without limitation, 9-1-1 response, crime/gang prevention, and neighborhood police patrols; community center improvements for teen, after-school recreation and senior programs; neighborhood streets, alleys, potholes sidewalks and roads; and other general City services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5178, "fingerprint": "2014|201400487|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400487|MADERA", "content_hash": "660f11f9ca831d6f", "measure_id": "201400487", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; construct a new high school to reduce student overcrowding and ensure small class sizes; provide updated Career Technical education opportunities for job readiness, improve student access to computers and modern technology; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Madera Unified School District issue $70 million of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5925, "no_votes": 4237, "total_votes": 10162, "percent_yes": 58.305451682739616, "percent_no": 41.694548317260384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.613760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.866369", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; construct a new high school to reduce student overcrowding and ensure small class sizes; provide updated Career Technical education opportunities for job readiness, improve student access to computers and modern technology; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Madera Unified School District issue $70 million of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11331, "fingerprint": "2014|201400373|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400373|MARIN", "content_hash": "ccc1595432d98370", "measure_id": "201400373", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve quality education in Novato schools without increasing taxes and maintain stable local funding that cannot be taken by the State to: Maintain competitive science, math, engineering and other programs; Attract and retain high quality teachers; Integrate modern instructional technology to prepare students for future success. Shall Novato Unified School District renew the expiring school parcel tax at the current rate for 8 years, with an exemption for seniors, independent oversight, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11300, "no_votes": 2670, "total_votes": 13970, "percent_yes": 80.88761632068719, "percent_no": 19.112383679312813, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-05-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.886118", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.618285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.869178", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve quality education in Novato schools without increasing taxes and maintain stable local funding that cannot be taken by the State to: Maintain competitive science, math, engineering and other programs; Attract and retain high quality teachers; Integrate modern instructional technology to prepare students for future success. Shall Novato Unified School District renew the expiring school parcel tax at the current rate for 8 years, with an exemption for seniors, independent oversight, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11330, "fingerprint": "2014|201400087|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400087|MARIN", "content_hash": "ea87d71d215911d0", "measure_id": "201400087", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To finance acquisition of property at the entrance to Pacheco Valle by Marin County Open Space District for permanent open space and no other purpose, shall City of Novato incur indebtedness not exceeding $600,000 for City of Novato Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Pacheco Valle Area) and levy a special tax annually on each parcel within the District, as described in Resolution No. 3-14 (see ballot pamphlet), for no more than 15 years and in any event no later than fiscal year 2033-34, subject to appropriation limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 611, "no_votes": 31, "total_votes": 642, "percent_yes": 95.17133956386292, "percent_no": 4.828660436137085, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-04-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.884370", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.615545", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.867515", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance acquisition of property at the entrance to Pacheco Valle by Marin County Open Space District for permanent open space and no other purpose, shall City of Novato incur indebtedness not exceeding $600,000 for City of Novato Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Pacheco Valle Area) and levy a special tax annually on each parcel within the District, as described in Resolution No. 3-14 (see ballot pamphlet), for no more than 15 years and in any event no later than fiscal year 2033-34, subject to appropriation limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11329, "fingerprint": "2014|201400052|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400052|MARIN", "content_hash": "184256ab20698582", "measure_id": "201400052", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To replace Marin County\u2019s aging emergency communications system; reduce 911 response times; improve communications reliability during earthquakes, floods, fires, and other disasters; and ensure reliable com munications among police, fire, and paramedic first responders throughout Marin County, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing an annual parcel tax for 20 years based on land use, including $29 per single-family home, with public audits, expenditure reports, citizen oversight and low-income senior exemptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53125, "no_votes": 26415, "total_votes": 79540, "percent_yes": 66.7902941916017, "percent_no": 33.2097058083983, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.884184", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.615192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.867296", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace Marin County\u2019s aging emergency communications system; reduce 911 response times; improve communications reliability during earthquakes, floods, fires, and other disasters; and ensure reliable com munications among police, fire, and paramedic first responders throughout Marin County, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing an annual parcel tax for 20 years based on land use, including $29 per single-family home, with public audits, expenditure reports, citizen oversight and low-income senior exemptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5179, "fingerprint": "2014|201400013|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400013|MARIN", "content_hash": "953335e1fbc539ee", "measure_id": "201400013", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide critical funding to: upgrade local libraries, prevent closures, and maintain library hours; provide children, teen, senior and disabled programs including public education support; maintain books and digital collections; enhance library facilities and ADA accessibility; and ensure local funding can\u2019t be taken by the State, shall Marin County Free Library extend the current approved 2010, $49 parcel tax for 9 years with annual CPI adjustment, including independent citizen oversight and senior citizen exemptions? (2/3 vote)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26075, "no_votes": 7130, "total_votes": 33205, "percent_yes": 78.52733022135222, "percent_no": 21.472669778647784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.614288", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.866736", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide critical funding to: upgrade local libraries, prevent closures, and maintain library hours; provide children, teen, senior and disabled programs including public education support; maintain books and digital collections; enhance library facilities and ADA accessibility; and ensure local funding can\u2019t be taken by the State, shall Marin County Free Library extend the current approved 2010, $49 parcel tax for 9 years with annual CPI adjustment, including independent citizen oversight and senior citizen exemptions? (2/3 vote)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11333, "fingerprint": "2014|201400437|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400437|MARIN", "content_hash": "ffa7a659e81a02d6", "measure_id": "201400437", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; improve student access to instructional technology; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; and renovate the multi-purpose room; shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District issue $9,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 424, "no_votes": 441, "total_votes": 865, "percent_yes": 49.01734104046242, "percent_no": 50.98265895953758, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.886874", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.619567", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.869924", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; improve student access to instructional technology; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; and renovate the multi-purpose room; shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District issue $9,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11332, "fingerprint": "2014|201400374|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400374|MARIN", "content_hash": "9a14669d1ec50548", "measure_id": "201400374", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support excellent academic programs and high-quality, 21st-century education by: Retaining highly qualified, experienced teachers; Supporting innovative core academic programs and enhanced science, technology, engineering and math programs; Minimizing class size increases; Supporting art, music, and library programs. Shall Reed Union School District renew and increase its expiring annual education parcel tax by $138 per year for eight years, with senior exemptions, annual adjustments, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3249, "no_votes": 906, "total_votes": 4155, "percent_yes": 78.19494584837545, "percent_no": 21.805054151624546, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-05-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.886304", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.618662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.869357", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support excellent academic programs and high-quality, 21st-century education by: Retaining highly qualified, experienced teachers; Supporting innovative core academic programs and enhanced science, technology, engineering and math programs; Minimizing class size increases; Supporting art, music, and library programs. Shall Reed Union School District renew and increase its expiring annual education parcel tax by $138 per year for eight years, with senior exemptions, annual adjustments, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5180, "fingerprint": "2014|201400014|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400014|MARIN", "content_hash": "37b960a37298be3e", "measure_id": "201400014", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To enhance local farmers\u2019 contributions to our economy and provide Marin residents access to healthy, locally-grown food, shall Marin County permit the Agricultural Institute of Marin to create a permanent home for the Farmer\u2019s Market at Marin Civic Center, including a market canopy designed to respect Frank Lloyd Wright\u2019s building, accessible to pedestrians, bikes and public transit and an eco-friendly indoor market building not to exceed 30,000 square feet at no cost to Marin taxpayers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47724, "no_votes": 10681, "total_votes": 58405, "percent_yes": 81.71218217618355, "percent_no": 18.287817823816454, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.614573", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.866928", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance local farmers\u2019 contributions to our economy and provide Marin residents access to healthy, locally-grown food, shall Marin County permit the Agricultural Institute of Marin to create a permanent home for the Farmer\u2019s Market at Marin Civic Center, including a market canopy designed to respect Frank Lloyd Wright\u2019s building, accessible to pedestrians, bikes and public transit and an eco-friendly indoor market building not to exceed 30,000 square feet at no cost to Marin taxpayers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11334, "fingerprint": "2014|201400451|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400451|MARIN", "content_hash": "6f840e1240460f62", "measure_id": "201400451", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade and repair schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Dixie Elementary School District: update aging classrooms and instructional technology; provide updated middle school science class rooms; upgrade electrical wiring to current safety codes; improve campus safety and security; repair, construct, acquire, equip, classrooms, sites, facilities, by issuing $30 million of bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators, salaries, benefits or pensions and all funds used for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5692, "no_votes": 1953, "total_votes": 7645, "percent_yes": 74.4538914323087, "percent_no": 25.546108567691306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.887060", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.619852", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.870110", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and repair schools with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Dixie Elementary School District: update aging classrooms and instructional technology; provide updated middle school science class rooms; upgrade electrical wiring to current safety codes; improve campus safety and security; repair, construct, acquire, equip, classrooms, sites, facilities, by issuing $30 million of bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators, salaries, benefits or pensions and all funds used for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5191, "fingerprint": "2014|201400405|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400405|MARIN", "content_hash": "b431395d97e01df1", "measure_id": "201400405", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; increase student access to 21st century technology; renovate P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use, and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Petaluma Joint Union High School district issue $68,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries? (55% vote)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54, "no_votes": 39, "total_votes": 93, "percent_yes": 58.06451612903226, "percent_no": 41.93548387096774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.619287", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.869732", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; increase student access to 21st century technology; renovate P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use, and modernize/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Petaluma Joint Union High School district issue $68,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries? (55% vote)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11335, "fingerprint": "2014|201400478|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400478|MARIN", "content_hash": "4fa355f2f64ddb60", "measure_id": "201400478", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize, renovate, and/or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities to reduce student overcrowding; enhance student access to technology; make health and safety improvements; and replace outdated windows and heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems, shall the Kentfield School District issue $30,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no bond money used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3122, "no_votes": 1278, "total_votes": 4400, "percent_yes": 70.95454545454545, "percent_no": 29.045454545454547, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.887244", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.620138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.870290", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the State; modernize, renovate, and/or construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities to reduce student overcrowding; enhance student access to technology; make health and safety improvements; and replace outdated windows and heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems, shall the Kentfield School District issue $30,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no bond money used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5190, "fingerprint": "2014|201400393|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400393|MARIN", "content_hash": "5d8baf852a5187b5", "measure_id": "201400393", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high-quality education, relieve overcrowding, and provide safe and modern Larkspur-Corte Madera elementary and middle schools by replacing portables, constructing new classrooms, completing essential fire and earthquake safety upgrades, removing lead, asbestos, and hazardous material, and upgrading outdated heating, ventilation and electrical systems, shall Larkspur-Corte Madera School District issue up to $19,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all funds staying in Larkspur-Corte Madera schools? (55% vote)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2725, "no_votes": 1164, "total_votes": 3889, "percent_yes": 70.06942658781178, "percent_no": 29.930573412188224, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.618944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.869539", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high-quality education, relieve overcrowding, and provide safe and modern Larkspur-Corte Madera elementary and middle schools by replacing portables, constructing new classrooms, completing essential fire and earthquake safety upgrades, removing lead, asbestos, and hazardous material, and upgrading outdated heating, ventilation and electrical systems, shall Larkspur-Corte Madera School District issue up to $19,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all funds staying in Larkspur-Corte Madera schools? (55% vote)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11336, "fingerprint": "2014|201400518|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400518|MARIN", "content_hash": "2c95c9a9d7694a3a", "measure_id": "201400518", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high quality, innovative academic programs; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; maintain low student-to-teacher ratios; support the visual and performing arts and technology integration; and offset funding cuts by the State; shall the Ross School District renew its existing education parcel tax for eight years, with a one-time increase of $184, maintaining 3% annual adjustments, all funds staying local, with exemptions for property owners aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 865, "no_votes": 285, "total_votes": 1150, "percent_yes": 75.21739130434783, "percent_no": 24.782608695652172, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.887429", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.620421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.870479", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high quality, innovative academic programs; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; maintain low student-to-teacher ratios; support the visual and performing arts and technology integration; and offset funding cuts by the State; shall the Ross School District renew its existing education parcel tax for eight years, with a one-time increase of $184, maintaining 3% annual adjustments, all funds staying local, with exemptions for property owners aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5182, "fingerprint": "2014|201400129|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400129|MARIN", "content_hash": "8aeae3489b733d6e", "measure_id": "201400129", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and enhance San Anselmo Library open hours, adult and children\u2019s programs, and general library services, shall an ordinance be adopted approving a Special Library Services Tax of $54.00 per year per real estate parcel located in San Anselmo with a three percent (3%) annual cost of living increase, for a period of nine (9) years to augment money from the Town of San Anselmo\u2019s funding of library services and with expenditures monitored by an oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2355, "no_votes": 883, "total_votes": 3238, "percent_yes": 72.7300802964793, "percent_no": 27.2699197035207, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.615872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.867718", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and enhance San Anselmo Library open hours, adult and children\u2019s programs, and general library services, shall an ordinance be adopted approving a Special Library Services Tax of $54.00 per year per real estate parcel located in San Anselmo with a three percent (3%) annual cost of living increase, for a period of nine (9) years to augment money from the Town of San Anselmo\u2019s funding of library services and with expenditures monitored by an oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5192, "fingerprint": "2014|201400531|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400531|MARIN", "content_hash": "cafd661ff642177f", "measure_id": "201400531", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade facilities, prepare students for careers/university transfer, attract quality faculty, keep SRJC current, improve student access, upgrade classrooms/ labs/technology for 21st Century science/math skills, modernize career education facilities for vocational engineering, nursing, public safety, agriculture, jobs, meet earthquake/fire codes, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Sonoma County Junior College District issue $410,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66, "no_votes": 59, "total_votes": 125, "percent_yes": 52.8, "percent_no": 47.2, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.620711", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.870665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade facilities, prepare students for careers/university transfer, attract quality faculty, keep SRJC current, improve student access, upgrade classrooms/ labs/technology for 21st Century science/math skills, modernize career education facilities for vocational engineering, nursing, public safety, agriculture, jobs, meet earthquake/fire codes, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Sonoma County Junior College District issue $410,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5183, "fingerprint": "2014|201400192|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400192|MARIN", "content_hash": "2c81b9aabe297ece", "measure_id": "201400192", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to continue existing emergency services in the Town of Corte Madera, shall there be a continuation of the special tax for paramedic and/or emergency medical services for four more years at the annual amount of $75.00 per residence and per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal years 2015-2016 through 2018-2019, with the appropriations limit increasing by the amount of said tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2429, "no_votes": 813, "total_votes": 3242, "percent_yes": 74.92288710672425, "percent_no": 25.077112893275753, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.616148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.867907", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to continue existing emergency services in the Town of Corte Madera, shall there be a continuation of the special tax for paramedic and/or emergency medical services for four more years at the annual amount of $75.00 per residence and per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal years 2015-2016 through 2018-2019, with the appropriations limit increasing by the amount of said tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5184, "fingerprint": "2014|201400212|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400212|MARIN", "content_hash": "aab8faf03f1bb419", "measure_id": "201400212", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance combining Fairfax's existing $50 annual general tax with our $125 special tax and a $20 increase be adopted approving a five-year renewal of the special Fairfax municipal services tax of $195 annually for each business occupancy and dwelling unit, in order to: Keep our local Police Station open 24/7; Maintain Fire Department services; Provide funding for Public Works/safety projects; Enhance Youth and Senior programs; and Continue the Citizen's Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2140, "no_votes": 808, "total_votes": 2948, "percent_yes": 72.59158751696066, "percent_no": 27.408412483039342, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.616420", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.868086", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance combining Fairfax's existing $50 annual general tax with our $125 special tax and a $20 increase be adopted approving a five-year renewal of the special Fairfax municipal services tax of $195 annually for each business occupancy and dwelling unit, in order to: Keep our local Police Station open 24/7; Maintain Fire Department services; Provide funding for Public Works/safety projects; Enhance Youth and Senior programs; and Continue the Citizen's Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5185, "fingerprint": "2014|201400213|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400213|MARIN", "content_hash": "1fd8c7d2019d5de4", "measure_id": "201400213", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $57 in the first year and raising the tax $6 annually to a maximum of $75 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2146, "no_votes": 828, "total_votes": 2974, "percent_yes": 72.15870880968393, "percent_no": 27.84129119031607, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.616692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.868269", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $57 in the first year and raising the tax $6 annually to a maximum of $75 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5186, "fingerprint": "2014|201400245|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400245|MARIN", "content_hash": "1fd8c7d2019d5de4", "measure_id": "201400245", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $57 in the first year and raising the tax $6 annually to a maximum of $75 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3012, "no_votes": 1370, "total_votes": 4382, "percent_yes": 68.73573710634413, "percent_no": 31.264262893655868, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.617108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.868451", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $57 in the first year and raising the tax $6 annually to a maximum of $75 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5187, "fingerprint": "2014|201400314|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400314|MARIN", "content_hash": "c6b214c52586bcdf", "measure_id": "201400314", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing special tax for paramedic services be continued for four years in the increased amount of $57 in the first year and increased $6 annually, if needed, to a maximum of $75 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 747, "no_votes": 244, "total_votes": 991, "percent_yes": 75.37840565085772, "percent_no": 24.621594349142285, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.617452", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.868629", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing special tax for paramedic services be continued for four years in the increased amount of $57 in the first year and increased $6 annually, if needed, to a maximum of $75 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5188, "fingerprint": "2014|201400318|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400318|MARIN", "content_hash": "1fd8c7d2019d5de4", "measure_id": "201400318", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $57 in the first year and raising the tax $6 annually to a maximum of $75 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3125, "no_votes": 1351, "total_votes": 4476, "percent_yes": 69.81680071492404, "percent_no": 30.183199285075958, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.617730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.868811", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $57 in the first year and raising the tax $6 annually to a maximum of $75 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5189, "fingerprint": "2014|201400342|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400342|MARIN", "content_hash": "4e3ef8580af72a7a", "measure_id": "201400342", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain the City\u2019s long-term financial viability and improve local quality of life and essential services including storm drain repairs to protect the Bay, street/sidewalk maintenance, pothole repair, parks, landscape maintenance, youth/senior programs, library hours/services, disabled access, public safety, and other general services shall the City of Sausalito enact a half cent sales tax for 10 years, requiring independent financial audits/public review, with all funds remaining in Sausalito?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1676, "no_votes": 1079, "total_votes": 2755, "percent_yes": 60.83484573502722, "percent_no": 39.16515426497278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.618008", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.868990", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the City\u2019s long-term financial viability and improve local quality of life and essential services including storm drain repairs to protect the Bay, street/sidewalk maintenance, pothole repair, parks, landscape maintenance, youth/senior programs, library hours/services, disabled access, public safety, and other general services shall the City of Sausalito enact a half cent sales tax for 10 years, requiring independent financial audits/public review, with all funds remaining in Sausalito?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5181, "fingerprint": "2014|201400036|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400036|MARIN", "content_hash": "1fd8c7d2019d5de4", "measure_id": "201400036", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $57 in the first year and raising the tax $6 annually to a maximum of $75 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 416, "no_votes": 199, "total_votes": 615, "percent_yes": 67.64227642276423, "percent_no": 32.357723577235774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.614910", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.867115", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $57 in the first year and raising the tax $6 annually to a maximum of $75 per taxable living unit, or per 1,500 square feet of structure on a developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5193, "fingerprint": "2014|201400053|MARIPOSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400053|MARIPOSA", "content_hash": "2e557bdead7828da", "measure_id": "201400053", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Mariposa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Chapter 3.36 of the Mariposa County ordinance code be amended to increase the rate of tax imposed on occupants of lodging within the County who reside in such lodging for thirty consecutive calendar days or less, from ten-percent (10%) to eleven and one quarter-percent (11.25%) of the rent charged by operators of such lodging?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2153, "no_votes": 4367, "total_votes": 6520, "percent_yes": 33.02147239263803, "percent_no": 66.97852760736197, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.621003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.870856", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 3.36 of the Mariposa County ordinance code be amended to increase the rate of tax imposed on occupants of lodging within the County who reside in such lodging for thirty consecutive calendar days or less, from ten-percent (10%) to eleven and one quarter-percent (11.25%) of the rent charged by operators of such lodging?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mariposa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5198, "fingerprint": "2014|201400412|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400412|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "5ba8729e3edbb21a", "measure_id": "201400412", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve schools and protect the quality of education, renovate/modernize outdated classrooms and facilities for 21st Century learning, construct a  ymnasium for school/community use, and upgrade aging electrical, heating/ventilation systems, shall Round Valley Unified School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates to acquire, construct, repair and equip classrooms, sites and facilities, requiring financial audits and citizens' oversight, all money staying local and NO money taken by the State or used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 290, "no_votes": 108, "total_votes": 398, "percent_yes": 72.8643216080402, "percent_no": 27.1356783919598, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.623106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.871750", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve schools and protect the quality of education, renovate/modernize outdated classrooms and facilities for 21st Century learning, construct a  ymnasium for school/community use, and upgrade aging electrical, heating/ventilation systems, shall Round Valley Unified School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates to acquire, construct, repair and equip classrooms, sites and facilities, requiring financial audits and citizens' oversight, all money staying local and NO money taken by the State or used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5195, "fingerprint": "2014|201400215|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400215|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "6fd8844661a9d65a", "measure_id": "201400215", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain the City's fire suppression capabilities and its program to replace fire trucks and equipment on a schedule that keeps response times low, with positive effects on property owner insurance rates, shall the expiring Fire Equipment Tax Levy be extended for 10 years and the rate increased to $22 per parcel with all revenue restricted to those local purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1394, "no_votes": 395, "total_votes": 1789, "percent_yes": 77.92062604807155, "percent_no": 22.079373951928446, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.621886", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.871213", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the City's fire suppression capabilities and its program to replace fire trucks and equipment on a schedule that keeps response times low, with positive effects on property owner insurance rates, shall the expiring Fire Equipment Tax Levy be extended for 10 years and the rate increased to $22 per parcel with all revenue restricted to those local purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5197, "fingerprint": "2014|201400354|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400354|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "0046171061c50468", "measure_id": "201400354", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the one-half of one percent (0.5%) transaction and use tax used to fund essential public services, including police, fire prevention and protection, and emergency medical services, set to expire on September 25, 2015, be extended by Ordinance No. 1149 until repealed by majority vote in a municipal election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2660, "no_votes": 840, "total_votes": 3500, "percent_yes": 76.0, "percent_no": 24.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.622820", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.871571", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the one-half of one percent (0.5%) transaction and use tax used to fund essential public services, including police, fire prevention and protection, and emergency medical services, set to expire on September 25, 2015, be extended by Ordinance No. 1149 until repealed by majority vote in a municipal election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5199, "fingerprint": "2014|201400482|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400482|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "1cb3388141d41033", "measure_id": "201400482", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade and modernize Laytonville schools, repair and replace the oldest parts of the elementary school, increase efficiency and install renewable energy upgrades to reduce operating costs, improve access to modern technology, and construct, acquire, and repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, shall Laytonville Unified School District issue $5,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, with no money for administrators' salaries, annual financial audits, and independent citizens' oversight to ensure funds are only spent improving local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 610, "no_votes": 278, "total_votes": 888, "percent_yes": 68.69369369369369, "percent_no": 31.30630630630631, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.623887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.872113", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and modernize Laytonville schools, repair and replace the oldest parts of the elementary school, increase efficiency and install renewable energy upgrades to reduce operating costs, improve access to modern technology, and construct, acquire, and repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, shall Laytonville Unified School District issue $5,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, with no money for administrators' salaries, annual financial audits, and independent citizens' oversight to ensure funds are only spent improving local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5196, "fingerprint": "2014|201400299|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400299|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201400299", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63, "no_votes": 39, "total_votes": 102, "percent_yes": 61.76470588235294, "percent_no": 38.23529411764706, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.622498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.871392", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5194, "fingerprint": "2014|201400054|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400054|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "68f243c9ba1a5558", "measure_id": "201400054", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance, which is titled An Initiative to Assert the Right of Residents of Mendocino County in Order to Secure Clean Water, Air and Soil and Freedom From Chemical Trespass, Which Would Ban Hydraulic Fracturing, Directional and Horizontal Drilling, and Waste Injection Wells in the County of Mendocino and Invalidates Any and All Laws Contrary to this Purpose to the Extent They Effect the County of Mendocino, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16526, "no_votes": 7246, "total_votes": 23772, "percent_yes": 69.51876156823154, "percent_no": 30.48123843176846, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.621384", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.871035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance, which is titled An Initiative to Assert the Right of Residents of Mendocino County in Order to Secure Clean Water, Air and Soil and Freedom From Chemical Trespass, Which Would Ban Hydraulic Fracturing, Directional and Horizontal Drilling, and Waste Injection Wells in the County of Mendocino and Invalidates Any and All Laws Contrary to this Purpose to the Extent They Effect the County of Mendocino, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5206, "fingerprint": "2014|201400398|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400398|MERCED", "content_hash": "90ba7bafee5aa925", "measure_id": "201400398", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing the current tax rate and to improve quality of education; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and increase student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Merced River School District issue $1,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95, "no_votes": 60, "total_votes": 155, "percent_yes": 61.29032258064516, "percent_no": 38.70967741935484, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.660777", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.873764", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the current tax rate and to improve quality of education; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; and increase student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Merced River School District issue $1,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5205, "fingerprint": "2014|201400397|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400397|MERCED", "content_hash": "68372b2c290ca062", "measure_id": "201400397", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local elementary and middle schools by upgrading classrooms to address overcrowding; meeting modern academic/technology/safety standards; repairing electrical systems, leaky roofs, plumbing and deteriorating restrooms; improving fire safety/school security; removing asbestos/lead paint; repairing, constructing and acquiring educational facilities, sites and equipment; shall the Merced City Elementary School District issue $60,000,000 of bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5277, "no_votes": 3940, "total_votes": 9217, "percent_yes": 57.25290224585006, "percent_no": 42.74709775414994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.660495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.873577", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local elementary and middle schools by upgrading classrooms to address overcrowding; meeting modern academic/technology/safety standards; repairing electrical systems, leaky roofs, plumbing and deteriorating restrooms; improving fire safety/school security; removing asbestos/lead paint; repairing, constructing and acquiring educational facilities, sites and equipment; shall the Merced City Elementary School District issue $60,000,000 of bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5204, "fingerprint": "2014|201400394|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400394|MERCED", "content_hash": "9fe05ea7bfeb5ae2", "measure_id": "201400394", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; upgrade the Ag farm; increase student access to computers and modern technology; and improve p.e. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Le Grand Union High School District issue $4,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 401, "no_votes": 316, "total_votes": 717, "percent_yes": 55.92747559274756, "percent_no": 44.07252440725244, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.660179", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.873389", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; upgrade the Ag farm; increase student access to computers and modern technology; and improve p.e. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Le Grand Union High School District issue $4,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5207, "fingerprint": "2014|201400409|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400409|MERCED", "content_hash": "c76d1c1a829ea788", "measure_id": "201400409", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize outdated school facilities and increase student access to modern classroom technology, acquire and construct classrooms and support facilities, reduce operating costs and increase energy efficiency and student safety, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Planada Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $1,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee, and no funds for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 220, "no_votes": 133, "total_votes": 353, "percent_yes": 62.3229461756374, "percent_no": 37.6770538243626, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.661122", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.873951", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize outdated school facilities and increase student access to modern classroom technology, acquire and construct classrooms and support facilities, reduce operating costs and increase energy efficiency and student safety, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Planada Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $1,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee, and no funds for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5208, "fingerprint": "2014|201400469|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400469|MERCED", "content_hash": "267de2be3df2f090", "measure_id": "201400469", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; and upgrade outdated heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; shall the Gustine Unified School District issue $14,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 962, "no_votes": 499, "total_votes": 1461, "percent_yes": 65.84531143052703, "percent_no": 34.15468856947297, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.661529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.874136", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; and upgrade outdated heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; shall the Gustine Unified School District issue $14,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5200, "fingerprint": "2014|201400160|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400160|MERCED", "content_hash": "fbcfe7471187f239", "measure_id": "201400160", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Atwater Municipal Code be amended to establish and impose upon the offices of Mayor and Councilmember term limits of no more than twelve (12) years as the maximum total number of years an individual may serve in either or both offices in the City of Atwater?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3399, "no_votes": 659, "total_votes": 4058, "percent_yes": 83.76047313947758, "percent_no": 16.239526860522417, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.658883", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.872655", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Atwater Municipal Code be amended to establish and impose upon the offices of Mayor and Councilmember term limits of no more than twelve (12) years as the maximum total number of years an individual may serve in either or both offices in the City of Atwater?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5201, "fingerprint": "2014|201400248|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400248|MERCED", "content_hash": "14309fa9a08b09df", "measure_id": "201400248", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of the Mayor\u2019s office in the City of Livingston be four (4) years, commencing with the term of the Mayor elected in the 2014 General Municipal Election? (Currently, the elected Mayor serves a term of two (2) years as provided for by the voters in the November 2000 General Election.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 701, "no_votes": 625, "total_votes": 1326, "percent_yes": 52.86576168929111, "percent_no": 47.13423831070889, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.659221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.872838", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of the Mayor\u2019s office in the City of Livingston be four (4) years, commencing with the term of the Mayor elected in the 2014 General Municipal Election? (Currently, the elected Mayor serves a term of two (2) years as provided for by the voters in the November 2000 General Election.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5202, "fingerprint": "2014|201400249|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400249|MERCED", "content_hash": "8e3149c9f3468757", "measure_id": "201400249", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall four members of the legislative body of the City of Los Banos be elected by districts described in Ordinance No.__, and the Mayor of the City of Los Banos be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire city to serve a two-year term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2929, "no_votes": 1615, "total_votes": 4544, "percent_yes": 64.45862676056338, "percent_no": 35.54137323943662, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.659616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.873026", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall four members of the legislative body of the City of Los Banos be elected by districts described in Ordinance No.__, and the Mayor of the City of Los Banos be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire city to serve a two-year term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5203, "fingerprint": "2014|201400255|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400255|MERCED", "content_hash": "04df75d4b92ae7eb", "measure_id": "201400255", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 400 of the Merced City Charter be amended to change the City\u2019s at-large election system to a Council by single-member district election system with the Mayor elected at-large, and to allow by ordinance the drawing of district boundary lines?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5420, "no_votes": 5052, "total_votes": 10472, "percent_yes": 51.75706646294882, "percent_no": 48.24293353705118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.659897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.873205", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 400 of the Merced City Charter be amended to change the City\u2019s at-large election system to a Council by single-member district election system with the Mayor elected at-large, and to allow by ordinance the drawing of district boundary lines?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5209, "fingerprint": "2014|201400002|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400002|MODOC", "content_hash": "ba418ebf49f07b32", "measure_id": "201400002", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Jim Wills be recalled (removed) from the office of County Supervisor, District 4?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 251, "no_votes": 371, "total_votes": 622, "percent_yes": 40.35369774919614, "percent_no": 59.64630225080386, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-04-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.661866", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.874326", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jim Wills be recalled (removed) from the office of County Supervisor, District 4?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5210, "fingerprint": "2014|201400151|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400151|MODOC", "content_hash": "65d799c7e53c7e2b", "measure_id": "201400151", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Alturas City Council be authorized to continue a supplemental charge of $1.50 per meter to minimum water rates to fund mosquito abatement in the City of Alturas Effective December 1, 2014?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 534, "no_votes": 172, "total_votes": 706, "percent_yes": 75.63739376770539, "percent_no": 24.36260623229461, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.662514", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.874869", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Alturas City Council be authorized to continue a supplemental charge of $1.50 per meter to minimum water rates to fund mosquito abatement in the City of Alturas Effective December 1, 2014?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5222, "fingerprint": "2014|201400424|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400424|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "9ff3a2cb3862c0e5", "measure_id": "201400424", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Meredith Ibarra be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member, trustee area 1?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 236, "no_votes": 93, "total_votes": 329, "percent_yes": 71.73252279635258, "percent_no": 28.267477203647417, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-09-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.666696", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.877252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Meredith Ibarra be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member, trustee area 1?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5225, "fingerprint": "2014|201400508|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400508|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "131c69c90bb07e4f", "measure_id": "201400508", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational software; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall Pacific Grove Unified School District issue $18 million of short-term bonds with the interest rates at or below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator/teacher salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4020, "no_votes": 2704, "total_votes": 6724, "percent_yes": 59.78584176085663, "percent_no": 40.21415823914337, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.667608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.877800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational software; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall Pacific Grove Unified School District issue $18 million of short-term bonds with the interest rates at or below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator/teacher salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5226, "fingerprint": "2014|201400519|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400519|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "820f51f4d2c32c62", "measure_id": "201400519", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities, libraries/computer systems to keep pace with technology, repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, improve student safety/campus security, acquire, renovate, construct/equip classrooms, sites/facilities relieving overcrowding, providing students with required education/training needed to succeed in college/careers, shall Salinas Union High School District issue $128,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14730, "no_votes": 9698, "total_votes": 24428, "percent_yes": 60.29965613230719, "percent_no": 39.70034386769281, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.667912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.877987", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities, libraries/computer systems to keep pace with technology, repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, improve student safety/campus security, acquire, renovate, construct/equip classrooms, sites/facilities relieving overcrowding, providing students with required education/training needed to succeed in college/careers, shall Salinas Union High School District issue $128,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5223, "fingerprint": "2014|201400467|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400467|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "bc0baf93686bd967", "measure_id": "201400467", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To add new elementary school classrooms at Mary Chapa School to support math, science, reading and writing programs, relieve school overcrowding, improve campus safety and security, to provide updated classroom computers/instructional technology for quality 21st Century education, and to construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities and equipment, shall Greenfield Union Elementary School District issue $10 million in bonds which cannot be taken by the State, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, independent financial audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1014, "no_votes": 612, "total_votes": 1626, "percent_yes": 62.36162361623616, "percent_no": 37.63837638376384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.666970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.877433", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To add new elementary school classrooms at Mary Chapa School to support math, science, reading and writing programs, relieve school overcrowding, improve campus safety and security, to provide updated classroom computers/instructional technology for quality 21st Century education, and to construct, acquire, repair classrooms, facilities and equipment, shall Greenfield Union Elementary School District issue $10 million in bonds which cannot be taken by the State, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, independent financial audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5224, "fingerprint": "2014|201400468|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400468|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "e42f60ec3614be84", "measure_id": "201400468", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a multi-purpose classroom, a library/media center and restrooms at Mary Chapa School, provide updated classroom computers/instructional technology for quality 21st Century education, acquire land for a new school, and to construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, shall Greenfield Union Elementary School District issue $10 million in bonds which cannot be taken by the State, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, independent financial audits, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 987, "no_votes": 636, "total_votes": 1623, "percent_yes": 60.81330868761553, "percent_no": 39.18669131238447, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.667243", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.877617", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a multi-purpose classroom, a library/media center and restrooms at Mary Chapa School, provide updated classroom computers/instructional technology for quality 21st Century education, acquire land for a new school, and to construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, shall Greenfield Union Elementary School District issue $10 million in bonds which cannot be taken by the State, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, independent financial audits, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5215, "fingerprint": "2014|201400251|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400251|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "0a0eb7314ed372e8", "measure_id": "201400251", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Marina\u2019s Municipal Code be amended to eliminate the temporary increase in the existing transient occupancy tax rate from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) and to make permanent the increase from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) to continue preserving funds for general City services such as police, fire, street repair, park maintenance, and recreation and community programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2903, "no_votes": 1057, "total_votes": 3960, "percent_yes": 73.30808080808082, "percent_no": 26.691919191919183, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.664141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.875785", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Marina\u2019s Municipal Code be amended to eliminate the temporary increase in the existing transient occupancy tax rate from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) and to make permanent the increase from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) to continue preserving funds for general City services such as police, fire, street repair, park maintenance, and recreation and community programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5216, "fingerprint": "2014|201400252|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400252|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "4a895293a1791a84", "measure_id": "201400252", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue preserving funds for general city services, including maintaining firefighters and police officers for adequate emergency response, reducing crime and criminal gang and drug activity, maintaining city streets and parks, and youth after school programs; shall the City of Marina adopt an ordinance extending the temporary one cent transactions and use (sales) tax to automatically expire on March 31, 2026.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3086, "no_votes": 898, "total_votes": 3984, "percent_yes": 77.45983935742971, "percent_no": 22.540160642570285, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.664449", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.875971", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue preserving funds for general city services, including maintaining firefighters and police officers for adequate emergency response, reducing crime and criminal gang and drug activity, maintaining city streets and parks, and youth after school programs; shall the City of Marina adopt an ordinance extending the temporary one cent transactions and use (sales) tax to automatically expire on March 31, 2026.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5218, "fingerprint": "2014|201400316|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400316|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "18c883d6064004e8", "measure_id": "201400316", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve our quality of life, maintain and enhance city services and facilities, including: crime and gang prevention; neighborhood policing and school safety; safety inspections; police, fire and paramedic response; fixing potholes, streets, and sidewalks; recreation and programs for youth and seniors; and other city services, shall the City of Salinas enact a one cent sales tax, that can\u2019t be taken by the State, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual independent audits, with all funds dedicated to Salinas?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11227, "no_votes": 6762, "total_votes": 17989, "percent_yes": 62.41036188782033, "percent_no": 37.58963811217967, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.665033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.876328", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve our quality of life, maintain and enhance city services and facilities, including: crime and gang prevention; neighborhood policing and school safety; safety inspections; police, fire and paramedic response; fixing potholes, streets, and sidewalks; recreation and programs for youth and seniors; and other city services, shall the City of Salinas enact a one cent sales tax, that can\u2019t be taken by the State, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual independent audits, with all funds dedicated to Salinas?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5219, "fingerprint": "2014|201400317|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400317|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "e9360ac3243ea5cc", "measure_id": "201400317", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Utility Users Tax Ordinance be amended to reduce the tax on telecommunications and video users from 6 percent to 5 percent; exempt seniors; modernize the ordinance to include wireless and other technologies and treat taxpayers the same regardless of technology; help fund essential city services including: public safety, fire protection, youth programs, parks and recreation, and street repairs and maintenance, and all money staying local for services and facilities in the City of Salinas?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10807, "no_votes": 6869, "total_votes": 17676, "percent_yes": 61.13939805385834, "percent_no": 38.86060194614166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.665379", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.876518", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Utility Users Tax Ordinance be amended to reduce the tax on telecommunications and video users from 6 percent to 5 percent; exempt seniors; modernize the ordinance to include wireless and other technologies and treat taxpayers the same regardless of technology; help fund essential city services including: public safety, fire protection, youth programs, parks and recreation, and street repairs and maintenance, and all money staying local for services and facilities in the City of Salinas?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5221, "fingerprint": "2014|201400347|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400347|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "132f28697ff08bda", "measure_id": "201400347", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 3.09 of the Soledad Municipal Code be amended to extend the existing five (5) year term of the City\u2019s one percent (1%) Temporary Transactions and Use Tax by fifteen (15) years, to 2032, to continue to fund essential services such as police, fire, emergency response, street maintenance, park & recreation and other general government services, subject to review by a  Citizens Oversight Committee, annual independent audits, and exclusive use by the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 896, "no_votes": 522, "total_votes": 1418, "percent_yes": 63.18758815232722, "percent_no": 36.81241184767278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.666014", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.876876", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 3.09 of the Soledad Municipal Code be amended to extend the existing five (5) year term of the City\u2019s one percent (1%) Temporary Transactions and Use Tax by fifteen (15) years, to 2032, to continue to fund essential services such as police, fire, emergency response, street maintenance, park & recreation and other general government services, subject to review by a  Citizens Oversight Committee, annual independent audits, and exclusive use by the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5220, "fingerprint": "2014|201400329|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400329|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "21ba6cc15d4799c9", "measure_id": "201400329", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the rate of a transactions and use tax on the retail sale of goods in Sand City used for general City purposes, from one-half of one percent to one percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46, "no_votes": 32, "total_votes": 78, "percent_yes": 58.97435897435898, "percent_no": 41.02564102564102, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.665729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.876698", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the rate of a transactions and use tax on the retail sale of goods in Sand City used for general City purposes, from one-half of one percent to one percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5212, "fingerprint": "2014|201400220|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400220|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "02f83fccbd1e9640", "measure_id": "201400220", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect essential services, such as public safety and street and park repairs, initiate work on desired facilities like the community center and pool, continue the development of innovative programs for economic growth and youth, adult and senior activities, and address unanticipated debt, shall Gonzales enact a one-half percent (.50%) transactions and use tax, for ten (10) years, reviewed by a citizen\u2019s oversight committee and annual independent audit, for use exclusively in Gonzales?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 596, "no_votes": 298, "total_votes": 894, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.663161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.875230", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect essential services, such as public safety and street and park repairs, initiate work on desired facilities like the community center and pool, continue the development of innovative programs for economic growth and youth, adult and senior activities, and address unanticipated debt, shall Gonzales enact a one-half percent (.50%) transactions and use tax, for ten (10) years, reviewed by a citizen\u2019s oversight committee and annual independent audit, for use exclusively in Gonzales?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5227, "fingerprint": "2014|201400521|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400521|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "9615fbf283e4616f", "measure_id": "201400521", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, construct/acquire facilities, sites/equipment, prepare students/returning veterans for universities/good paying jobs, address severe budget cuts by updating aging classrooms, improving/maintaining nursing, paramedic, 9-1-1 medical training, welding, engineering, automotive, early childhood education/other career education programs, repairing deteriorating gas/electrical lines, upgrading technology, shall San Luis Obispo County Community College District issue $275,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 114, "no_votes": 57, "total_votes": 171, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.668228", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.878169", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, construct/acquire facilities, sites/equipment, prepare students/returning veterans for universities/good paying jobs, address severe budget cuts by updating aging classrooms, improving/maintaining nursing, paramedic, 9-1-1 medical training, welding, engineering, automotive, early childhood education/other career education programs, repairing deteriorating gas/electrical lines, upgrading technology, shall San Luis Obispo County Community College District issue $275,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5213, "fingerprint": "2014|201400239|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400239|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "25380ddd0becbec1", "measure_id": "201400239", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address the City of King financial situation, improve city finances and improve the services to the city residents, shall the City of King establish a \u00bd cent sales tax legally ending in 7 years, with independent citizen oversight, regular audits and no funding for salary or benefit increases for current employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 670, "no_votes": 391, "total_votes": 1061, "percent_yes": 63.14797360980208, "percent_no": 36.85202639019792, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.663442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.875418", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address the City of King financial situation, improve city finances and improve the services to the city residents, shall the City of King establish a \u00bd cent sales tax legally ending in 7 years, with independent citizen oversight, regular audits and no funding for salary or benefit increases for current employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11337, "fingerprint": "2014|201400389|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400389|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "5411ee4a0de644a6", "measure_id": "201400389", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, increase student access to computers, modern technology; construct a new elementary school to reduce student overcrowding; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Gonzales Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue $16,900,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 408, "no_votes": 416, "total_votes": 824, "percent_yes": 49.51456310679611, "percent_no": 50.48543689320389, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.894198", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.666298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.877064", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, increase student access to computers, modern technology; construct a new elementary school to reduce student overcrowding; make health, safety and security improvements; modernize, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Gonzales Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue $16,900,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5214, "fingerprint": "2014|201400240|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400240|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "bbbdf6b480ea3a98", "measure_id": "201400240", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If the City's General Sales Tax Measure should pass, the council shall utilize the revenue in the following manner: 1) 50% - Public Safety (Police, Fire, Recreation); 2) 30% - Money Management (Debt Reduction & Reserves); 3)10% - Communication; 4) 10% -Appearance. None of the funds generated shall be used to provide salary or benefit increases to existing staff. An independent oversight board shall be appointed by the Mayor, with the Council's concurrence, to make recommendations to the Council on the expenditure of funds.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 738, "no_votes": 313, "total_votes": 1051, "percent_yes": 70.21883920076118, "percent_no": 29.78116079923882, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.663729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.875605", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If the City's General Sales Tax Measure should pass, the council shall utilize the revenue in the following manner: 1) 50% - Public Safety (Police, Fire, Recreation); 2) 30% - Money Management (Debt Reduction & Reserves); 3)10% - Communication; 4) 10% -Appearance. None of the funds generated shall be used to provide salary or benefit increases to existing staff. An independent oversight board shall be appointed by the Mayor, with the Council's concurrence, to make recommendations to the Council on the expenditure of funds.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5217, "fingerprint": "2014|201400257|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400257|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "11e16bdfccebd4fd", "measure_id": "201400257", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Monterey address significant deferred maintenance by fixing streets, sidewalks, and potholes; improve related access and safety for senior citizens, disabled residents, and others; and repair its 100-year-old storm drain system to protect our beaches/Monterey Bay, by enacting a one cent per dollar transactions and use (\"sales\") tax to sunset in 4 years, with all revenue exclusively applied to these specific purposes, subject to citizen oversight and annual financial/performance audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5031, "no_votes": 1737, "total_votes": 6768, "percent_yes": 74.33510638297872, "percent_no": 25.664893617021278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.664752", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.876149", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Monterey address significant deferred maintenance by fixing streets, sidewalks, and potholes; improve related access and safety for senior citizens, disabled residents, and others; and repair its 100-year-old storm drain system to protect our beaches/Monterey Bay, by enacting a one cent per dollar transactions and use (\"sales\") tax to sunset in 4 years, with all revenue exclusively applied to these specific purposes, subject to citizen oversight and annual financial/performance audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5211, "fingerprint": "2014|201400198|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400198|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "3fee8a073d056a09", "measure_id": "201400198", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve essential city services and facilities in Del Rey Oaks, including crime prevention and emergency response; repair of streets and sidewalks; and other city services; shall the City of Del Rey Oaks increase the transactions and use tax by an additional one half of one percent (.50%) to provide an on-going source of local funds to be used only in Del Rey Oaks, the proceeds of said tax to be utilized for general governmental purposes, protected from State takeways?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 371, "no_votes": 211, "total_votes": 582, "percent_yes": 63.745704467353946, "percent_no": 36.254295532646054, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.662850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.875046", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve essential city services and facilities in Del Rey Oaks, including crime prevention and emergency response; repair of streets and sidewalks; and other city services; shall the City of Del Rey Oaks increase the transactions and use tax by an additional one half of one percent (.50%) to provide an on-going source of local funds to be used only in Del Rey Oaks, the proceeds of said tax to be utilized for general governmental purposes, protected from State takeways?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5228, "fingerprint": "2014|201400265|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400265|NAPA", "content_hash": "721cc33ae2bb3414", "measure_id": "201400265", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City expand the boundaries of the City\u2019s rural urban limit line (\u201cRUL\u201d) by adding the 154 acre property known as the Napa Pipe Property inside the boundaries of the RUL, through an amendment to City Charter Section 180?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14209, "no_votes": 6348, "total_votes": 20557, "percent_yes": 69.12000778323686, "percent_no": 30.879992216763142, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.668714", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.878542", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City expand the boundaries of the City\u2019s rural urban limit line (\u201cRUL\u201d) by adding the 154 acre property known as the Napa Pipe Property inside the boundaries of the RUL, through an amendment to City Charter Section 180?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5229, "fingerprint": "2014|201400266|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400266|NAPA", "content_hash": "bb358b197ff8dfea", "measure_id": "201400266", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City update its personnel systems so the Personnel Director will be reclassified as the \u201cPersonnel Manager,\u201d who will be hired and supervised by a department head using processes that apply to all classified City employees, through an amendment to City Charter Section 76.1?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13088, "no_votes": 6136, "total_votes": 19224, "percent_yes": 68.0815647107782, "percent_no": 31.918435289221804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.669033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.878730", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City update its personnel systems so the Personnel Director will be reclassified as the \u201cPersonnel Manager,\u201d who will be hired and supervised by a department head using processes that apply to all classified City employees, through an amendment to City Charter Section 76.1?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5230, "fingerprint": "2014|201400267|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400267|NAPA", "content_hash": "c6e19d020928eb25", "measure_id": "201400267", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City clarify the authority of the City Manager to hire \u201cappointive officers,\u201d including the Police Chief, the Fire Chief, and all department heads, through an amendment to City Charter Sections 75 and 76.1?[", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12245, "no_votes": 6977, "total_votes": 19222, "percent_yes": 63.70304859015711, "percent_no": 36.29695140984289, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.669348", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.878917", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City clarify the authority of the City Manager to hire \u201cappointive officers,\u201d including the Police Chief, the Fire Chief, and all department heads, through an amendment to City Charter Sections 75 and 76.1?[", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5232, "fingerprint": "2014|201400497|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400497|NAPA", "content_hash": "b317313de9b79003", "measure_id": "201400497", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade educational facilities, prepare students for careers/university transfers, and retain/attract quality faculty by expanding Veteran\u2019s center, upgrading technology for 21st Century education/jobs training, expanding career training classrooms in welding/trades/science/ engineering/healthcare, and acquiring, constructing, and repairing classrooms/facilities/sites/equipment, shall Napa Valley Community College District issue $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizens\u2019 oversight, audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19768, "no_votes": 16982, "total_votes": 36750, "percent_yes": 53.79047619047619, "percent_no": 46.20952380952381, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.670063", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.879289", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade educational facilities, prepare students for careers/university transfers, and retain/attract quality faculty by expanding Veteran\u2019s center, upgrading technology for 21st Century education/jobs training, expanding career training classrooms in welding/trades/science/ engineering/healthcare, and acquiring, constructing, and repairing classrooms/facilities/sites/equipment, shall Napa Valley Community College District issue $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizens\u2019 oversight, audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5231, "fingerprint": "2014|201400363|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400363|NAPA", "content_hash": "d3762f01e9962950", "measure_id": "201400363", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to fully utilize TOT and sales tax generated for vital public services, street maintenance, police and fire emergency medical service programs, shall the appropriations limit set pursuant to Article 13B of the California Constitution be increased by the amount of $1,500,000 in additional funds each year for a four year period commencing with fiscal year 2014/15? By approving this appropriation limit, no new taxes are created nor will any existing tax be increased.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 982, "no_votes": 186, "total_votes": 1168, "percent_yes": 84.07534246575342, "percent_no": 15.924657534246577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.669747", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.879105", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to fully utilize TOT and sales tax generated for vital public services, street maintenance, police and fire emergency medical service programs, shall the appropriations limit set pursuant to Article 13B of the California Constitution be increased by the amount of $1,500,000 in additional funds each year for a four year period commencing with fiscal year 2014/15? By approving this appropriation limit, no new taxes are created nor will any existing tax be increased.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5233, "fingerprint": "2014|201400001|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400001|NEVADA", "content_hash": "fe08c7a9cf46a873", "measure_id": "201400001", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Beyers Lane Community Service District levy an annual special tax upon all taxable real property located within the boundaries of the Beyers Lane Community Service District in an amount not to exceed $350 per parcel per year for the purpose of providing road maintenance and improvements within the boundaries of the Beyers Lane Community Service District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21, "no_votes": 26, "total_votes": 47, "percent_yes": 44.68085106382978, "percent_no": 55.31914893617022, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-03-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.670345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.879485", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Beyers Lane Community Service District levy an annual special tax upon all taxable real property located within the boundaries of the Beyers Lane Community Service District in an amount not to exceed $350 per parcel per year for the purpose of providing road maintenance and improvements within the boundaries of the Beyers Lane Community Service District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5235, "fingerprint": "2014|201400137|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400137|NEVADA", "content_hash": "489c49c5a19df4a3", "measure_id": "201400137", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To construct the Truckee River Legacy Trail; provide safe routes to schools; build and maintain paved and dirt trails for walking, running, biking, and winter use; provide safe and green transportation alternatives; and protect the environment and natural open space along trail corridors, shall the Town of Truckee increase the sales tax paid by visitors and residents by 1/4% for ten years with independent oversight, all funds staying in Truckee, and no funds taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2224, "no_votes": 698, "total_votes": 2922, "percent_yes": 76.11225188227242, "percent_no": 23.887748117727583, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.670983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.879850", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct the Truckee River Legacy Trail; provide safe routes to schools; build and maintain paved and dirt trails for walking, running, biking, and winter use; provide safe and green transportation alternatives; and protect the environment and natural open space along trail corridors, shall the Town of Truckee increase the sales tax paid by visitors and residents by 1/4% for ten years with independent oversight, all funds staying in Truckee, and no funds taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5234, "fingerprint": "2014|201400055|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400055|NEVADA", "content_hash": "22168e0248b4409e", "measure_id": "201400055", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall medical marijuana cultivation in Nevada County be allowed to expand by amending the County's General Code to (a) increase the allowed sizes of cultivation areas; (b) reduce or eliminate setback requirements between cultivation areas and adjacent residences and sensitive uses; and (c) eliminate various marijuana cultivation regulations and restrictions related to nuisance control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12980, "no_votes": 25664, "total_votes": 38644, "percent_yes": 33.58865541869372, "percent_no": 66.41134458130628, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.670668", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.879669", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall medical marijuana cultivation in Nevada County be allowed to expand by amending the County's General Code to (a) increase the allowed sizes of cultivation areas; (b) reduce or eliminate setback requirements between cultivation areas and adjacent residences and sensitive uses; and (c) eliminate various marijuana cultivation regulations and restrictions related to nuisance control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5236, "fingerprint": "2014|201400536|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400536|NEVADA", "content_hash": "795a2322dd0a96c5", "measure_id": "201400536", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Truckee area schools with funding that the State cannot take away, repair/replace roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, help local schools qualify for State matching funds, and construct, equip, repair/acquire classrooms, science labs, career technical education facilities to provide a well-rounded education and prepare students for college/high-demand jobs, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Tahoe-Truckee Unified School District issue $114,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with independent audits, citizen oversight, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2700, "no_votes": 2141, "total_votes": 4841, "percent_yes": 55.77360049576534, "percent_no": 44.22639950423466, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.671306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.880035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Truckee area schools with funding that the State cannot take away, repair/replace roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, help local schools qualify for State matching funds, and construct, equip, repair/acquire classrooms, science labs, career technical education facilities to provide a well-rounded education and prepare students for college/high-demand jobs, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Tahoe-Truckee Unified School District issue $114,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with independent audits, citizen oversight, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5237, "fingerprint": "2014|201400015|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400015|ORANGE", "content_hash": "bc72c8182db7ca63", "measure_id": "201400015", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To prevent the County of Orange from paying required employee contributions for members of the board of supervisors and other county elected officials who begin a term on or after June 4, 2014.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 277669, "no_votes": 38395, "total_votes": 316064, "percent_yes": 87.85214386959603, "percent_no": 12.147856130403966, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.671616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.880225", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent the County of Orange from paying required employee contributions for members of the board of supervisors and other county elected officials who begin a term on or after June 4, 2014.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5256, "fingerprint": "2014|201400330|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400330|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4427593e8ccc5567", "measure_id": "201400330", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance authorizing an amendment to the City's Utility Users Tax (`'UUT\") Ordinance (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 35, Article VI) be approved? This measure will 1) modernize the City's UUT as it relates to telecommunications; 2) will reduce the UUT across the board from the rate of six percent (6%) down to five and one-half percent (5\u00bd%) of all charges made for telecommunication, electricity, gas and water services; and 3) eliminates exemptions, including a maximum tax cap of $11,000 so that all taxpayers are treated equally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24845, "no_votes": 7955, "total_votes": 32800, "percent_yes": 75.7469512195122, "percent_no": 24.253048780487802, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.677492", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.884505", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance authorizing an amendment to the City's Utility Users Tax (`'UUT\") Ordinance (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 35, Article VI) be approved? This measure will 1) modernize the City's UUT as it relates to telecommunications; 2) will reduce the UUT across the board from the rate of six percent (6%) down to five and one-half percent (5\u00bd%) of all charges made for telecommunication, electricity, gas and water services; and 3) eliminates exemptions, including a maximum tax cap of $11,000 so that all taxpayers are treated equally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5265, "fingerprint": "2014|201400378|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400378|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c01dde9a169a3728", "measure_id": "201400378", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and security; repair/replace aging schools' old roofs, leaky plumbing and outdated wiring; upgrade school classrooms, science rooms, libraries and facilities with modern technology to meet 21st Century standards; and qualify for State matching funds, shall Buena Park School District, serving Buena Park and neighborhoods in La Palma and Fullerton, issue $71 million in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money controlled locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2229, "no_votes": 1104, "total_votes": 3333, "percent_yes": 66.87668766876688, "percent_no": 33.12331233123312, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.680127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.887021", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and security; repair/replace aging schools' old roofs, leaky plumbing and outdated wiring; upgrade school classrooms, science rooms, libraries and facilities with modern technology to meet 21st Century standards; and qualify for State matching funds, shall Buena Park School District, serving Buena Park and neighborhoods in La Palma and Fullerton, issue $71 million in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money controlled locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5257, "fingerprint": "2014|201400331|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400331|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0ec5fed9b7008fb1", "measure_id": "201400331", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending chapter 18 of the municipal code to delete and replace article xiii, to delete section 41-121, delete subsection (b) of section 41-144, and amend article xii of chapter 21 by adding sections 21-126, 21-127, 21-128, 21-129 and 21-130 to regulate the establishment, operation and taxation of medical marijuana collectives and cooperatives be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22147, "no_votes": 11482, "total_votes": 33629, "percent_yes": 65.85684974278153, "percent_no": 34.143150257218466, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.677803", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.884812", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending chapter 18 of the municipal code to delete and replace article xiii, to delete section 41-121, delete subsection (b) of section 41-144, and amend article xii of chapter 21 by adding sections 21-126, 21-127, 21-128, 21-129 and 21-130 to regulate the establishment, operation and taxation of medical marijuana collectives and cooperatives be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5240, "fingerprint": "2014|201400089|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400089|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fd13fcfe64d4c771", "measure_id": "201400089", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to: modernize and remove outdated language to reflect changes in the City and law; authorize financial documents' availability in electronic format; update matters regarding boards/commissions; allow setting City Manager compensation by agreement, resolution or ordinance; authorize methods for selling municipal property; permit City Council to delegate Treasurer's appointment/removal to City Manager; allow Treasurer and Finance Director to be the same person upon Council approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15424, "no_votes": 7671, "total_votes": 23095, "percent_yes": 66.78501840225157, "percent_no": 33.214981597748434, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.672428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.880771", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to: modernize and remove outdated language to reflect changes in the City and law; authorize financial documents' availability in electronic format; update matters regarding boards/commissions; allow setting City Manager compensation by agreement, resolution or ordinance; authorize methods for selling municipal property; permit City Council to delegate Treasurer's appointment/removal to City Manager; allow Treasurer and Finance Director to be the same person upon Council approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5258, "fingerprint": "2014|201400332|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400332|ORANGE", "content_hash": "521ef594b02ad270", "measure_id": "201400332", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Medical Cannabis Restriction and Limitation Initiative ordinance seeking 1) to eliminate an existing City ordinance prohibiting the sale of medical marijuana from store-front dispensaries and 2) to replace it with a new ordinance which does all of the following: 1) Permits medical marijuana collectives and cooperatives in the C1, C4, C5, M1 and P& C-SM zones; 2) Requires an administrative registration process; 3) Requires payment of a business tax of $20.00 for each $1,000 of gross receipts; 4) Prohibits collectives and cooperatives in all residential zones; 5) Prohibits collectives and cooperatives from locating within 600 feet of public and private K-12th grade schools; 6) Establishes a formula of one (1) collective or cooperative for every 15,000 people, but in no case shall there be less than 22 collectives/ cooperatives; 7) Requires lighting and alarm systems for security; 8) Prohibits collectives and cooperatives from also possessing an Alcohol and Beverage Control license; 9) Contains signage restrictions; and 10) Requires compliance with the 2008 Attorney General Guidelines for the Security and Non-Diversion of Marijuana Grown for Medical Use be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18090, "no_votes": 14987, "total_votes": 33077, "percent_yes": 54.69057048704538, "percent_no": 45.30942951295462, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.678107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.885111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Medical Cannabis Restriction and Limitation Initiative ordinance seeking 1) to eliminate an existing City ordinance prohibiting the sale of medical marijuana from store-front dispensaries and 2) to replace it with a new ordinance which does all of the following: 1) Permits medical marijuana collectives and cooperatives in the C1, C4, C5, M1 and P& C-SM zones; 2) Requires an administrative registration process; 3) Requires payment of a business tax of $20.00 for each $1,000 of gross receipts; 4) Prohibits collectives and cooperatives in all residential zones; 5) Prohibits collectives and cooperatives from locating within 600 feet of public and private K-12th grade schools; 6) Establishes a formula of one (1) collective or cooperative for every 15,000 people, but in no case shall there be less than 22 collectives/ cooperatives; 7) Requires lighting and alarm systems for security; 8) Prohibits collectives and cooperatives from also possessing an Alcohol and Beverage Control license; 9) Contains signage restrictions; and 10) Requires compliance with the 2008 Attorney General Guidelines for the Security and Non-Diversion of Marijuana Grown for Medical Use be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5241, "fingerprint": "2014|201400090|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400090|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c1922ce95d34790f", "measure_id": "201400090", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Anaheim City Charter Sections 500 and 504 be amended to change the term of office of the Mayor from four years to two years, and to clarify how \"eight years of service\" is determined for the purpose of calculating term limits for someone serving as Mayor by also amending Section 503.5?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10946, "no_votes": 12999, "total_votes": 23945, "percent_yes": 45.7130925036542, "percent_no": 54.2869074963458, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.672700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.880959", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Anaheim City Charter Sections 500 and 504 be amended to change the term of office of the Mayor from four years to two years, and to clarify how \"eight years of service\" is determined for the purpose of calculating term limits for someone serving as Mayor by also amending Section 503.5?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5259, "fingerprint": "2014|201400343|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400343|ORANGE", "content_hash": "bff536891f8749a9", "measure_id": "201400343", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City's Utility User Tax (\"UUT\") be lowered and the UUT ordinance be modernized to apply equally to all telecommunication services regardless of the type of technology used be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7418, "no_votes": 1833, "total_votes": 9251, "percent_yes": 80.1859258458545, "percent_no": 19.8140741541455, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.678377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.885396", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's Utility User Tax (\"UUT\") be lowered and the UUT ordinance be modernized to apply equally to all telecommunication services regardless of the type of technology used be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11338, "fingerprint": "2014|201400091|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400091|ORANGE", "content_hash": "94abc365b6a74884", "measure_id": "201400091", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.40.030, which prohibits (bans) the retail sale, possession or use of safe and sane fireworks in the City of Anaheim except pursuant to a public display permit issued by the Fire Chief, be repealed and the City Council granted the authority to regulate safe and sane fireworks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13316, "no_votes": 10962, "total_votes": 24278, "percent_yes": 54.84801054452591, "percent_no": 45.15198945547409, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.898512", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.672971", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.881141", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.40.030, which prohibits (bans) the retail sale, possession or use of safe and sane fireworks in the City of Anaheim except pursuant to a public display permit issued by the Fire Chief, be repealed and the City Council granted the authority to regulate safe and sane fireworks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5238, "fingerprint": "2014|201400056|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400056|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ee2be1f5b23d382e", "measure_id": "201400056", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Orange County Campaign Reform Ordinance be amended to authorize the Fair Political Practices Commission to be the civil prosecutor of the Ordinance and to add administrative enforcement to the Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 300263, "no_votes": 229970, "total_votes": 530233, "percent_yes": 56.62850105519649, "percent_no": 43.37149894480351, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.671888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.880406", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Orange County Campaign Reform Ordinance be amended to authorize the Fair Political Practices Commission to be the civil prosecutor of the Ordinance and to add administrative enforcement to the Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5260, "fingerprint": "2014|201400344|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400344|ORANGE", "content_hash": "48239a7fe086b1cf", "measure_id": "201400344", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to specify that the position of City Clerk would be appointed, not elected? The City Council will have the option of determining whether the City Council or the City Manager would have the authority to appoint the City Clerk.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4772, "no_votes": 4350, "total_votes": 9122, "percent_yes": 52.31308923481692, "percent_no": 47.68691076518308, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.678647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.885699", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to specify that the position of City Clerk would be appointed, not elected? The City Council will have the option of determining whether the City Council or the City Manager would have the authority to appoint the City Clerk.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5239, "fingerprint": "2014|201400057|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400057|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3dea3af88519cb82", "measure_id": "201400057", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter of the County of Orange be amended to change the method for filling vacancies on the Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 377106, "no_votes": 157394, "total_votes": 534500, "percent_yes": 70.55304022450889, "percent_no": 29.44695977549111, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.672159", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.880588", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the County of Orange be amended to change the method for filling vacancies on the Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5261, "fingerprint": "2014|201400348|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400348|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9fbbc6dcef1375f3", "measure_id": "201400348", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance adding Chapter 3.05 to the stanton municipal code to impose a transactions and use tax to be administered by the State Board of Equalization be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2543, "no_votes": 2092, "total_votes": 4635, "percent_yes": 54.86515641855447, "percent_no": 45.13484358144553, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.678918", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.886015", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance adding Chapter 3.05 to the stanton municipal code to impose a transactions and use tax to be administered by the State Board of Equalization be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5266, "fingerprint": "2014|201400429|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400429|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9a26f1bba3fd1639", "measure_id": "201400429", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood schools, by repairing classrooms and labs, including leaky roofs, decaying walls, deteriorating restrooms, and accessibility for disabled students; upgrading basic infrastructure and utilities, including drinking water, sewer, and gas; enhancing safety and security, including fire safety and security systems; and acquiring, upgrading, and constructing 21st century classrooms, schools, sites, and support facilities, shall Anaheim Union High School District issue $249 million of bonds at legal rates, with audits, citizen oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30238, "no_votes": 20939, "total_votes": 51177, "percent_yes": 59.08513590089298, "percent_no": 40.91486409910702, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.680398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.887214", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood schools, by repairing classrooms and labs, including leaky roofs, decaying walls, deteriorating restrooms, and accessibility for disabled students; upgrading basic infrastructure and utilities, including drinking water, sewer, and gas; enhancing safety and security, including fire safety and security systems; and acquiring, upgrading, and constructing 21st century classrooms, schools, sites, and support facilities, shall Anaheim Union High School District issue $249 million of bonds at legal rates, with audits, citizen oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5262, "fingerprint": "2014|201400353|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400353|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3380354e0da0f6ef", "measure_id": "201400353", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending sections 2702 and 2703 of Chapter 7 of Article 2 of the Tustin city code concerning the uniform transient occupancy tax be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5724, "no_votes": 5102, "total_votes": 10826, "percent_yes": 52.872713837058924, "percent_no": 47.127286162941076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.679194", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.886327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending sections 2702 and 2703 of Chapter 7 of Article 2 of the Tustin city code concerning the uniform transient occupancy tax be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5263, "fingerprint": "2014|201400357|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400357|ORANGE", "content_hash": "25c2222e5f333b3f", "measure_id": "201400357", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure to permit the purchase, sale, and use of Safe and Sane Fireworks in the City, subject to the rules and regulations established by the City Council be adopted? Specifically, this ballot measure proposes to add Section 11-2.05 to Article 11-2 of the Villa Park Municipal Code, which would permit the purchase, sale, and use of Safe and Sane Fireworks in the City subject to the rules and regulations established by the City Council.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1436, "no_votes": 1109, "total_votes": 2545, "percent_yes": 56.424361493123776, "percent_no": 43.575638506876224, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.679552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.886619", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure to permit the purchase, sale, and use of Safe and Sane Fireworks in the City, subject to the rules and regulations established by the City Council be adopted? Specifically, this ballot measure proposes to add Section 11-2.05 to Article 11-2 of the Villa Park Municipal Code, which would permit the purchase, sale, and use of Safe and Sane Fireworks in the City subject to the rules and regulations established by the City Council.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5264, "fingerprint": "2014|201400362|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400362|ORANGE", "content_hash": "5ce4ec24af1db44d", "measure_id": "201400362", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance eliminating future City Council member pension and health care benefits be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16061, "no_votes": 2714, "total_votes": 18775, "percent_yes": 85.54460719041278, "percent_no": 14.455392809587224, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.679857", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.886827", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance eliminating future City Council member pension and health care benefits be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5267, "fingerprint": "2014|201400507|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400507|ORANGE", "content_hash": "66568978a2d7c52a", "measure_id": "201400507", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair or replace aging, outdated high school classrooms/science labs with safe, modern facilities and maintain the quality of education, upgrade career-training facilities, libraries, and computer systems to keep pace with technology, improve student safety/campus security, acquire, construct, repair schools, facilities/equipment to provide students with the education and training needed to succeed in college/careers, shall Orange Unified School District issue $296 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25992, "no_votes": 21613, "total_votes": 47605, "percent_yes": 54.599306795504674, "percent_no": 45.400693204495326, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.697901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.887793", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair or replace aging, outdated high school classrooms/science labs with safe, modern facilities and maintain the quality of education, upgrade career-training facilities, libraries, and computer systems to keep pace with technology, improve student safety/campus security, acquire, construct, repair schools, facilities/equipment to provide students with the education and training needed to succeed in college/careers, shall Orange Unified School District issue $296 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5242, "fingerprint": "2014|201400152|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400152|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e5f6b737e3276d06", "measure_id": "201400152", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed Charter Amendment be adopted to change the method of electing City Council members (except the Mayor) by amending the City Charter to require: (i) City Council member election from residency districts by voters of that district; (ii) the City Council to establish and periodically adjust district boundaries, and (iii) amendments to the Charter for City Council eligibility and filling vacancies? This Charter amendment measure does not give the Council the power to raise its compensation or that of city officials without voter approval.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30873, "no_votes": 13981, "total_votes": 44854, "percent_yes": 68.82998171846435, "percent_no": 31.170018281535647, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.673354", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.881323", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed Charter Amendment be adopted to change the method of electing City Council members (except the Mayor) by amending the City Charter to require: (i) City Council member election from residency districts by voters of that district; (ii) the City Council to establish and periodically adjust district boundaries, and (iii) amendments to the Charter for City Council eligibility and filling vacancies? This Charter amendment measure does not give the Council the power to raise its compensation or that of city officials without voter approval.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5243, "fingerprint": "2014|201400153|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400153|ORANGE", "content_hash": "85abf3ca5b89e77a", "measure_id": "201400153", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to increase the number of City Council members from four (plus the Mayor) to six (plus the Mayor); provide for election to fill newly created Council seats and thereafter stagger Council terms so that every two years, three of the Council members stand for election; and amend the City Charter to reflect the increase in Council membership in various provisions where there is a Council decision or action requiring a specified number of Council member votes? This amendment does not give the City Council power to raise its compensation or that of other City officials without voter approval.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23752, "no_votes": 20103, "total_votes": 43855, "percent_yes": 54.16030099190514, "percent_no": 45.83969900809486, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.673660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.881506", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to increase the number of City Council members from four (plus the Mayor) to six (plus the Mayor); provide for election to fill newly created Council seats and thereafter stagger Council terms so that every two years, three of the Council members stand for election; and amend the City Charter to reflect the increase in Council membership in various provisions where there is a Council decision or action requiring a specified number of Council member votes? This amendment does not give the City Council power to raise its compensation or that of other City officials without voter approval.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5244, "fingerprint": "2014|201400154|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400154|ORANGE", "content_hash": "5d2d6cbd4be6bb09", "measure_id": "201400154", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: update language regarding financial reserves, reaffirm and authorize the transfer of money to the City's general fund to support general City services pursuant to Article XIII C, section 2, subdivision (b) of the California Constitution, remove unnecessary language that duplicates a requirement of the California Constitution, and authorize programs to assist non-residential and residential customers? This amendment does not give the City Council power to raise its compensation or that of other City officials without voter approval.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21413, "no_votes": 21535, "total_votes": 42948, "percent_yes": 49.857967774983706, "percent_no": 50.142032225016294, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.673966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.881691", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to: update language regarding financial reserves, reaffirm and authorize the transfer of money to the City's general fund to support general City services pursuant to Article XIII C, section 2, subdivision (b) of the California Constitution, remove unnecessary language that duplicates a requirement of the California Constitution, and authorize programs to assist non-residential and residential customers? This amendment does not give the City Council power to raise its compensation or that of other City officials without voter approval.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5245, "fingerprint": "2014|201400193|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400193|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6d2e3cacc38337c4", "measure_id": "201400193", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Costa Mesa establish home rule by adopting the proposed charter as approved by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6994, "no_votes": 12084, "total_votes": 19078, "percent_yes": 36.66002725652584, "percent_no": 63.33997274347416, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.674235", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.881876", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Costa Mesa establish home rule by adopting the proposed charter as approved by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5246, "fingerprint": "2014|201400194|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400194|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0f203471465e21ee", "measure_id": "201400194", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you agree with the Costa Mesa City Council, which unanimously opposes the establishment of toll lanes on the I-405 Freeway in Orange County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10558, "no_votes": 8806, "total_votes": 19364, "percent_yes": 54.52385870687875, "percent_no": 45.47614129312125, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.674503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.882057", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you agree with the Costa Mesa City Council, which unanimously opposes the establishment of toll lanes on the I-405 Freeway in Orange County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5247, "fingerprint": "2014|201400196|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400196|ORANGE", "content_hash": "97e8000370c706b9", "measure_id": "201400196", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2014-03 AND THE HARMONY 2015 SPECIFIC PLAN, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9470 MOODY STREET FROM PS-1A PUBLIC & SEMI-PUBLIC TO PC PLANNED COMMUNITY (PC-14) be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5212, "no_votes": 5686, "total_votes": 10898, "percent_yes": 47.82528904386126, "percent_no": 52.17471095613874, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.674806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.882245", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2014-03 AND THE HARMONY 2015 SPECIFIC PLAN, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9470 MOODY STREET FROM PS-1A PUBLIC & SEMI-PUBLIC TO PC PLANNED COMMUNITY (PC-14) be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5248, "fingerprint": "2014|201400197|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400197|ORANGE", "content_hash": "def14ff9265590fc", "measure_id": "201400197", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2014-02 AND THE MACKAY PLACE SPECIFIC PLAN, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 6.8 ACRES OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8721 CYPRESS AVENUE FROM PS-1A PUBLIC & SEMI-PUBLIC TO PC PLANNED COMMUNITY (PC-13) be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6272, "no_votes": 4747, "total_votes": 11019, "percent_yes": 56.91986568654143, "percent_no": 43.08013431345857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.675179", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.882428", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2014-02 AND THE MACKAY PLACE SPECIFIC PLAN, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 6.8 ACRES OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8721 CYPRESS AVENUE FROM PS-1A PUBLIC & SEMI-PUBLIC TO PC PLANNED COMMUNITY (PC-13) be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5249, "fingerprint": "2014|201400217|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400217|ORANGE", "content_hash": "14c76d8b7f072013", "measure_id": "201400217", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the transient occupancy tax of the City of Fountain Valley be increased from the current 9% to 10%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5850, "no_votes": 8945, "total_votes": 14795, "percent_yes": 39.54038526529232, "percent_no": 60.45961473470768, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.675448", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.882612", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the transient occupancy tax of the City of Fountain Valley be increased from the current 9% to 10%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5250, "fingerprint": "2014|201400231|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400231|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b59a6f5378622e20", "measure_id": "201400231", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall it be lawful to possess, sell, display, use or discharge within the City, those fireworks that are defined and classified as Safe and Sane Fireworks (a.k.a. \"state-approved fireworks\") in the California State Fireworks Law (Sections 12500 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code and the relevant sections of Code of Regulations Title 19, Subchapter 6) subject to regulation by City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31512, "no_votes": 19796, "total_votes": 51308, "percent_yes": 61.41732283464568, "percent_no": 38.58267716535432, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.675758", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.882792", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be lawful to possess, sell, display, use or discharge within the City, those fireworks that are defined and classified as Safe and Sane Fireworks (a.k.a. \"state-approved fireworks\") in the California State Fireworks Law (Sections 12500 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code and the relevant sections of Code of Regulations Title 19, Subchapter 6) subject to regulation by City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5251, "fingerprint": "2014|201400235|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400235|ORANGE", "content_hash": "581f4aa3eb541cf2", "measure_id": "201400235", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Orange County Great Park Fiscal Transparency and Reforms Ordinance be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34846, "no_votes": 4430, "total_votes": 39276, "percent_yes": 88.720847336796, "percent_no": 11.279152663204002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.676041", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.882973", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Orange County Great Park Fiscal Transparency and Reforms Ordinance be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5252, "fingerprint": "2014|201400236|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400236|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c38f9ac189bbe050", "measure_id": "201400236", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance specifying lifetime term limits for City Council members and for the Mayor be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29361, "no_votes": 9986, "total_votes": 39347, "percent_yes": 74.62068264416601, "percent_no": 25.37931735583399, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.676310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.883153", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance specifying lifetime term limits for City Council members and for the Mayor be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5253, "fingerprint": "2014|201400244|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400244|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d6c43385ae4d424c", "measure_id": "201400244", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Ordinance of the City of Lake Forest which would add Section 2.04.080 to the Lake Forest Municipal Code be adopted? Section 2.04.080 would establish a three four-year term limit for the Mayor and City Council Members.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12534, "no_votes": 3693, "total_votes": 16227, "percent_yes": 77.24163431318173, "percent_no": 22.758365686818266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.676576", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.883335", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Ordinance of the City of Lake Forest which would add Section 2.04.080 to the Lake Forest Municipal Code be adopted? Section 2.04.080 would establish a three four-year term limit for the Mayor and City Council Members.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5254, "fingerprint": "2014|201400272|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400272|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8bed9a476eec812f", "measure_id": "201400272", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Land Use Element of the General Plan be amended to reduce non-residential development, such as office, retail, and visitor accommodations, currently authorized under the existing General Plan, but allow for more residential development. Also, average daily vehicle trips are expected to be reduced.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8180, "no_votes": 18401, "total_votes": 26581, "percent_yes": 30.77386102855423, "percent_no": 69.22613897144578, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.676884", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.883704", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Land Use Element of the General Plan be amended to reduce non-residential development, such as office, retail, and visitor accommodations, currently authorized under the existing General Plan, but allow for more residential development. Also, average daily vehicle trips are expected to be reduced.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5255, "fingerprint": "2014|201400302|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400302|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f3d82847b58aefa1", "measure_id": "201400302", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the proposed initiative be adopted to change the zoning of the site of the former Nissan automobile dealership located at 29901 Santa Margarita Parkway in the City of Rancho Santa Margarita from a classification of Auto Center/Auto Center Overlay (\"AC/AC-O\") to Commercial General/ Auto Center Overlay (\"CG/AC-O\")?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5149, "no_votes": 6183, "total_votes": 11332, "percent_yes": 45.43769855277091, "percent_no": 54.56230144722909, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.677185", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.884185", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the proposed initiative be adopted to change the zoning of the site of the former Nissan automobile dealership located at 29901 Santa Margarita Parkway in the City of Rancho Santa Margarita from a classification of Auto Center/Auto Center Overlay (\"AC/AC-O\") to Commercial General/ Auto Center Overlay (\"CG/AC-O\")?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5270, "fingerprint": "2014|201400545|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400545|PLACER", "content_hash": "f543c2fa902c7636", "measure_id": "201400545", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education, shall Western Placer Unified School District construct a new high school, and improve Lincoln High School by updating/replacing aging classrooms and support facilities, and instructional technology needed for improved teaching, replacing portable classrooms, repairing/replacing roofs, worn-out floors, electrical systems, seismic upgrades and improving energy efficiency to save money and support instruction by issuing $60,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10742, "no_votes": 6676, "total_votes": 17418, "percent_yes": 61.67183373521644, "percent_no": 38.32816626478356, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.735194", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.888767", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education, shall Western Placer Unified School District construct a new high school, and improve Lincoln High School by updating/replacing aging classrooms and support facilities, and instructional technology needed for improved teaching, replacing portable classrooms, repairing/replacing roofs, worn-out floors, electrical systems, seismic upgrades and improving energy efficiency to save money and support instruction by issuing $60,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5268, "fingerprint": "2014|201400058|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400058|PLACER", "content_hash": "69f7c4fdc28196dd", "measure_id": "201400058", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to provide an effective representative government, restrict future pay increases, pension and healthcare costs, shall Placer County amend Article II, Section 207 of the County Charter to limit the Board of Supervisors salary to no more than the average salary of County Supervisors in the neighboring Counties of El Dorado, Nevada, and Sacramento, with any change in this methodology subject to a vote of the citizens of Placer County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66902, "no_votes": 39935, "total_votes": 106837, "percent_yes": 62.62062768516525, "percent_no": 37.37937231483475, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.698376", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.887985", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide an effective representative government, restrict future pay increases, pension and healthcare costs, shall Placer County amend Article II, Section 207 of the County Charter to limit the Board of Supervisors salary to no more than the average salary of County Supervisors in the neighboring Counties of El Dorado, Nevada, and Sacramento, with any change in this methodology subject to a vote of the citizens of Placer County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5269, "fingerprint": "2014|201400453|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400453|PLACER", "content_hash": "01268d6c97a7a1ae", "measure_id": "201400453", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; make health and safety improvements; and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall the East Nicolaus High School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18, "no_votes": 19, "total_votes": 37, "percent_yes": 48.64864864864865, "percent_no": 51.35135135135135, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.698730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.888179", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; make health and safety improvements; and replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms; shall the East Nicolaus High School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5274, "fingerprint": "2014|201400111|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400111|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "51f62ad2523507d9", "measure_id": "201400111", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Tom Owings be (replaced) recalled as City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2728, "no_votes": 633, "total_votes": 3361, "percent_yes": 81.16631954775364, "percent_no": 18.833680452246355, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.736665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.889561", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Tom Owings be (replaced) recalled as City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5294, "fingerprint": "2014|201400262|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400262|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "797da948e9d9d150", "measure_id": "201400262", "measure_letter": "5", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Victoria Baca be (replaced) recalled as City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1834, "no_votes": 1159, "total_votes": 2993, "percent_yes": 61.276311393250914, "percent_no": 38.723688606749086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.742799", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.893443", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Victoria Baca be (replaced) recalled as City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5304, "fingerprint": "2014|201400495|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400495|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "23a62b518fb70f9f", "measure_id": "201400495", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To expand college buildings serving four-year university transfer, veterans' education, and career training, by expanding career/support facilities for veterans/military, ensuring buildings are accessible for the disabled, upgrading nursing, emergency responder, criminal justice, vocational job training classrooms, updating science labs, electrical systems, technology infrastructure, acquiring, constructing, and repairing classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Mt. San Jacinto Community College District issue $295,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight of funds, all funds remaining local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76993, "no_votes": 53904, "total_votes": 130897, "percent_yes": 58.81952985935507, "percent_no": 41.18047014064493, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.745780", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.895472", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand college buildings serving four-year university transfer, veterans' education, and career training, by expanding career/support facilities for veterans/military, ensuring buildings are accessible for the disabled, upgrading nursing, emergency responder, criminal justice, vocational job training classrooms, updating science labs, electrical systems, technology infrastructure, acquiring, constructing, and repairing classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Mt. San Jacinto Community College District issue $295,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight of funds, all funds remaining local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5272, "fingerprint": "2014|201400096|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400096|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1b8d6f70d6213473", "measure_id": "201400096", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain fiscal stability, address state takeaways and prevent cuts to vital services by retaining police, firefighters, paramedics/emergency dispatch operators; maintaining 911 emergency/ambulance response; funding graffiti removal, pothole/street repair, senior programs, after school, anti-drug/anti-gang and other general services; shall Cathedral City continue its existing voter approved one cent sales tax with no rate increase, requiring citizen\u2019s review, and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3645, "no_votes": 1846, "total_votes": 5491, "percent_yes": 66.38135130213077, "percent_no": 33.61864869786923, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.736001", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.889150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain fiscal stability, address state takeaways and prevent cuts to vital services by retaining police, firefighters, paramedics/emergency dispatch operators; maintaining 911 emergency/ambulance response; funding graffiti removal, pothole/street repair, senior programs, after school, anti-drug/anti-gang and other general services; shall Cathedral City continue its existing voter approved one cent sales tax with no rate increase, requiring citizen\u2019s review, and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5305, "fingerprint": "2014|201400496|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400496|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "321b98b48b29bbf7", "measure_id": "201400496", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade outdated Murieta K12 classrooms, labs, career-training facilities and education technology, rehabilitate deteriorated roofs, plumbing,electrical, lighting, HVAC, flooring, buildings and grounds, acquire/construct/equip sites, classrooms, and facilities, upgrade safety/security systems and improve science, technology, engineering, and math instructional facilities, shall Murieta Valley Unified School District issue $98,000.000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefitting Murieta Valley K12 schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11278, "no_votes": 8184, "total_votes": 19462, "percent_yes": 57.948823348062895, "percent_no": 42.051176651937105, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.746108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.895671", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade outdated Murieta K12 classrooms, labs, career-training facilities and education technology, rehabilitate deteriorated roofs, plumbing,electrical, lighting, HVAC, flooring, buildings and grounds, acquire/construct/equip sites, classrooms, and facilities, upgrade safety/security systems and improve science, technology, engineering, and math instructional facilities, shall Murieta Valley Unified School District issue $98,000.000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefitting Murieta Valley K12 schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5299, "fingerprint": "2014|201400403|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400403|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "659406314dd371a6", "measure_id": "201400403", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to ensure all elementary students in Perris have access to the facilities, technology and training they need to succeed; repair and maintain classrooms and school buildings; construct a new school to relieve elementary school overcrowding; and upgrade classrooms, libraries and school to keep pace with technology, shall the Perris Elementary School District issue $40 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1153, "no_votes": 585, "total_votes": 1738, "percent_yes": 66.34062140391255, "percent_no": 33.65937859608745, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.744252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.894409", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to ensure all elementary students in Perris have access to the facilities, technology and training they need to succeed; repair and maintain classrooms and school buildings; construct a new school to relieve elementary school overcrowding; and upgrade classrooms, libraries and school to keep pace with technology, shall the Perris Elementary School District issue $40 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5298, "fingerprint": "2014|201400324|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400324|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "9e7d8211f36e37ca", "measure_id": "201400324", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain current police, firefighter and paramedic service levels, maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, maintain operational levels for existing neighborhood fire stations, parks, community buildings and infrastructure, and create jobs; shall the City of Jacinto establish a 6.5% Utility Users Tax for 10 years on utility services within the City, while exempting low-income seniors, requiring annual audits and allowing no tax rate increase without voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2608, "no_votes": 2858, "total_votes": 5466, "percent_yes": 47.71313574826198, "percent_no": 52.28686425173802, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.743977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.894218", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain current police, firefighter and paramedic service levels, maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, maintain operational levels for existing neighborhood fire stations, parks, community buildings and infrastructure, and create jobs; shall the City of Jacinto establish a 6.5% Utility Users Tax for 10 years on utility services within the City, while exempting low-income seniors, requiring annual audits and allowing no tax rate increase without voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5280, "fingerprint": "2014|201400179|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400179|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "51f92f4877562c8e", "measure_id": "201400179", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain Canyon Lake as an independent City providing effective 911, paramedic, firefighter services; maintaining sheriffs deputies/staffing levels; keeping Canyon Lake Fire Station open; preserving local control over land use decisions; maintaining Railroad Canyon Road/other city services, shall the City of Canyon Lake establish a 3.95% utility users' tax for 6 years, requiring no tax increase without voter approval; annual, published independent audits, and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1540, "no_votes": 1492, "total_votes": 3032, "percent_yes": 50.79155672823219, "percent_no": 49.20844327176781, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.738482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.890715", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain Canyon Lake as an independent City providing effective 911, paramedic, firefighter services; maintaining sheriffs deputies/staffing levels; keeping Canyon Lake Fire Station open; preserving local control over land use decisions; maintaining Railroad Canyon Road/other city services, shall the City of Canyon Lake establish a 3.95% utility users' tax for 6 years, requiring no tax increase without voter approval; annual, published independent audits, and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5271, "fingerprint": "2014|201400094|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400094|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "9fb066e306b666ac", "measure_id": "201400094", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To minimize future cuts and provide funding for essential city services including police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response, graffiti removal, and maintaining streets and public areas, shall the City of Banning adopt an ordinance to continue the existing Transient Occupancy Tax (which is a hotel bed tax paid when overnight visitors rent a room) at a cap rate of 12% with annual independent audits provided by code, and all funds used to maintain city services in Banning?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3444, "no_votes": 713, "total_votes": 4157, "percent_yes": 82.84820784219389, "percent_no": 17.151792157806113, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.735653", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.888959", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To minimize future cuts and provide funding for essential city services including police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response, graffiti removal, and maintaining streets and public areas, shall the City of Banning adopt an ordinance to continue the existing Transient Occupancy Tax (which is a hotel bed tax paid when overnight visitors rent a room) at a cap rate of 12% with annual independent audits provided by code, and all funds used to maintain city services in Banning?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5302, "fingerprint": "2014|201400477|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400477|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1668ec2562d2a370", "measure_id": "201400477", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Jurupa Unified School District upgrade career training and instructional technology, improve vocational facilities, science and computer labs for modern careers and skilled trades, improve school safety and security, repair aging classrooms, roofs, restrooms and electrical systems, by issuing $144 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, independent citizens' oversight, with all funds staying local and no money for administrators' salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5824, "no_votes": 3754, "total_votes": 9578, "percent_yes": 60.80601378158279, "percent_no": 39.19398621841721, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.745152", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.894987", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jurupa Unified School District upgrade career training and instructional technology, improve vocational facilities, science and computer labs for modern careers and skilled trades, improve school safety and security, repair aging classrooms, roofs, restrooms and electrical systems, by issuing $144 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, independent citizens' oversight, with all funds staying local and no money for administrators' salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5273, "fingerprint": "2014|201400100|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400100|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "41dcf152e7f574aa", "measure_id": "201400100", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address the City\u2019s Fiscal Emergency and prevent a significant decline in the availability of \u201cPublic Safety Services\u201d which includes: (a) police protection; (b) fire protection; (c) animal control; and (d) code enforcement, shall the City update its existing, voter-approved Public Safety parcel tax for vacant parcels only, at the rate of $372.68/acre, with annual audits and no tax increase for any other parcels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1446, "no_votes": 906, "total_votes": 2352, "percent_yes": 61.47959183673469, "percent_no": 38.52040816326531, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.736344", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.889360", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address the City\u2019s Fiscal Emergency and prevent a significant decline in the availability of \u201cPublic Safety Services\u201d which includes: (a) police protection; (b) fire protection; (c) animal control; and (d) code enforcement, shall the City update its existing, voter-approved Public Safety parcel tax for vacant parcels only, at the rate of $372.68/acre, with annual audits and no tax increase for any other parcels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5295, "fingerprint": "2014|201400284|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400284|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "75283a716907770d", "measure_id": "201400284", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1270 be adopted to approve an increase in the City's Transient Occupancy Tax from the current rate of nine percent (9%) to a rate of eleven percent (11%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5063, "no_votes": 6731, "total_votes": 11794, "percent_yes": 42.92860776666101, "percent_no": 57.07139223333899, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.743067", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.893638", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1270 be adopted to approve an increase in the City's Transient Occupancy Tax from the current rate of nine percent (9%) to a rate of eleven percent (11%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5300, "fingerprint": "2014|201400449|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400449|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "53a74e25ae2f69c9", "measure_id": "201400449", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Corona Norco Unified School District, serving areas of Corona, Norco and Eastvale, upgrade classrooms, science labs, computers, careertraining technology to support high-quality instruction in math, science, engineering, technology/skilled trades, repair/replace leaky roofs, floors, plumbing/hazardous materials where needed, address overcrowding, improve student safety/security, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, facilities/sites, by issuing $396 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no administrator salaries, and all funds dedicated to improving local neighborhood schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20876, "no_votes": 15734, "total_votes": 36610, "percent_yes": 57.02267140125649, "percent_no": 42.97732859874351, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.744560", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.894603", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Corona Norco Unified School District, serving areas of Corona, Norco and Eastvale, upgrade classrooms, science labs, computers, careertraining technology to support high-quality instruction in math, science, engineering, technology/skilled trades, repair/replace leaky roofs, floors, plumbing/hazardous materials where needed, address overcrowding, improve student safety/security, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, facilities/sites, by issuing $396 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no administrator salaries, and all funds dedicated to improving local neighborhood schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5296, "fingerprint": "2014|201400285|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400285|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "6ad89ef99fb19238", "measure_id": "201400285", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the City of Palm Desert's Transient Tax, as set forth in Chapter 328 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code is increased from 9% to 11%, should the City solely allocate the additional revenue for promotional efforts, including advertising, public relations, special event publicity, marketing collateral development, the City's BrightSide newsletter, and the official Palm Desert tourism website to maintain a consistent image for the City's local, regional, and national marketing campaign?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3935, "no_votes": 7565, "total_votes": 11500, "percent_yes": 34.21739130434783, "percent_no": 65.78260869565217, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.743375", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.893831", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the City of Palm Desert's Transient Tax, as set forth in Chapter 328 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code is increased from 9% to 11%, should the City solely allocate the additional revenue for promotional efforts, including advertising, public relations, special event publicity, marketing collateral development, the City's BrightSide newsletter, and the official Palm Desert tourism website to maintain a consistent image for the City's local, regional, and national marketing campaign?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5284, "fingerprint": "2014|201400199|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400199|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b5c9c747203cd41e", "measure_id": "201400199", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance implementing an annual tax of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet and then 10 dollars ($10.00) per square foot for the remaining space utilized in connection with the cultivation of marijuana for medical or casual/recreational use, for the purpose of raising revenue to fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2102, "no_votes": 1000, "total_votes": 3102, "percent_yes": 67.76273372018052, "percent_no": 32.23726627981948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.739722", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.891517", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance implementing an annual tax of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet and then 10 dollars ($10.00) per square foot for the remaining space utilized in connection with the cultivation of marijuana for medical or casual/recreational use, for the purpose of raising revenue to fund general municipal services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5290, "fingerprint": "2014|201400258|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400258|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "401d1c0f3802d5c9", "measure_id": "201400258", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be enacted to adopt term limits upon the members of the Moreno Valley City Council, preventing any person who serves three (3) successive terms from serving again until an intervening period of two (2) years has elapsed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16488, "no_votes": 4339, "total_votes": 20827, "percent_yes": 79.16646660584817, "percent_no": 20.83353339415183, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.741561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.892673", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be enacted to adopt term limits upon the members of the Moreno Valley City Council, preventing any person who serves three (3) successive terms from serving again until an intervening period of two (2) years has elapsed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5285, "fingerprint": "2014|201400200|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400200|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4dbfd0508eb37e3a", "measure_id": "201400200", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance implementing a monthly ten percent (10%) tax on the proceeds from the sale/provision of marijuana for medical or casual/recreational use for the purpose of raising revenue to fund general municipal services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2242, "no_votes": 862, "total_votes": 3104, "percent_yes": 72.22938144329896, "percent_no": 27.770618556701038, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.740077", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.891709", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance implementing a monthly ten percent (10%) tax on the proceeds from the sale/provision of marijuana for medical or casual/recreational use for the purpose of raising revenue to fund general municipal services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5275, "fingerprint": "2014|201400161|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400161|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cdbeca690b96c6c4", "measure_id": "201400161", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a general mining tax of 80 cents per ton upon the excavation and processing of rock material, and placing the proceeds of these taxes in the City's general fund to be spent for general governmental purposes, which includes police, fire, and maintaining streets and public areas, a well as to pay for studying, correcting and reducing the effects of mining on residents and businesses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3445, "no_votes": 3048, "total_votes": 6493, "percent_yes": 53.05713845679964, "percent_no": 46.94286154320036, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.737029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.889751", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a general mining tax of 80 cents per ton upon the excavation and processing of rock material, and placing the proceeds of these taxes in the City's general fund to be spent for general governmental purposes, which includes police, fire, and maintaining streets and public areas, a well as to pay for studying, correcting and reducing the effects of mining on residents and businesses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5286, "fingerprint": "2014|201400201|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400201|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "83f9c49d76080aa3", "measure_id": "201400201", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance implementing a one percent increase in the transaction and use tax for the purpose of funding general municipal services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1371, "no_votes": 1742, "total_votes": 3113, "percent_yes": 44.041117892708, "percent_no": 55.958882107292, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.740378", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.891903", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance implementing a one percent increase in the transaction and use tax for the purpose of funding general municipal services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5289, "fingerprint": "2014|201400253|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400253|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "862d9a303606124e", "measure_id": "201400253", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall measure \"CC\" be amended to provide that compensation for the Mayor of the City of Menifee be set at the same level as that of all other members of the City Council plus $100 per month subject to adjustment on an annual basis at the same rate as that permitted for members of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9441, "no_votes": 6213, "total_votes": 15654, "percent_yes": 60.31046377922576, "percent_no": 39.68953622077424, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.741287", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.892481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall measure \"CC\" be amended to provide that compensation for the Mayor of the City of Menifee be set at the same level as that of all other members of the City Council plus $100 per month subject to adjustment on an annual basis at the same rate as that permitted for members of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5301, "fingerprint": "2014|201400450|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400450|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "830c09df55eec4bb", "measure_id": "201400450", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, labs for career/technical education classes to prepare students for college/good-paying jobs in math, science, engineering, technology/ skilled trades, repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, acquire, renovate, construct/equip classrooms, sites/facilities to keep pace with technology, shall Desert Sands Unified School District issue $225,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no administrators' salaries, and all money staying local, without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27027, "no_votes": 11862, "total_votes": 38889, "percent_yes": 69.49780143485305, "percent_no": 30.502198565146955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.744877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.894794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, labs for career/technical education classes to prepare students for college/good-paying jobs in math, science, engineering, technology/ skilled trades, repair deteriorating roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, acquire, renovate, construct/equip classrooms, sites/facilities to keep pace with technology, shall Desert Sands Unified School District issue $225,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no administrators' salaries, and all money staying local, without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5297, "fingerprint": "2014|201400313|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400313|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c8069830fcf539ce", "measure_id": "201400313", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition \"R\", Measure \"C\", the City of Riverside's General Plan 2025 and Title 19 (Zoning) of the Riverside Municipal Code be amended, and the Rancho La Sierra Specific Plan be repealed to permanently preserve the La Sierra Hills as open space and allow restricted residential development on the La Sierra Lands?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18209, "no_votes": 24338, "total_votes": 42547, "percent_yes": 42.79737701835617, "percent_no": 57.20262298164383, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.743650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.894025", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition \"R\", Measure \"C\", the City of Riverside's General Plan 2025 and Title 19 (Zoning) of the Riverside Municipal Code be amended, and the Rancho La Sierra Specific Plan be repealed to permanently preserve the La Sierra Hills as open space and allow restricted residential development on the La Sierra Lands?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5303, "fingerprint": "2014|201400494|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400494|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1d418df6cd18ee19", "measure_id": "201400494", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities and computer systems to keep pace with technology, fix aging classrooms/schools, improve student safety and security, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, prepare students for success in college/high-demand jobs, protect instruction in math, science, technology and the trades, shall Moreno Valley Unified School District issue $398,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12348, "no_votes": 6928, "total_votes": 19276, "percent_yes": 64.05893338866984, "percent_no": 35.94106661133016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.745463", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.895180", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, science labs, career-training facilities and computer systems to keep pace with technology, fix aging classrooms/schools, improve student safety and security, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, prepare students for success in college/high-demand jobs, protect instruction in math, science, technology and the trades, shall Moreno Valley Unified School District issue $398,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5281, "fingerprint": "2014|201400181|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400181|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "93f534877407c35c", "measure_id": "201400181", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help fund general municipal services, including but not limited to police protection and crime suppression services, emergency medical services, park, recreation, and library facilities and services, and general improvements throughout the City, shall an ordinance to impose a tax at the rate of up to fifteen cents per each one dollar of proceeds or fractional part thereof on marijuana collectives and dispensaries operating in Cathedral city be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5765, "no_votes": 2279, "total_votes": 8044, "percent_yes": 71.66832421680755, "percent_no": 28.331675783192452, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.738801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.890906", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help fund general municipal services, including but not limited to police protection and crime suppression services, emergency medical services, park, recreation, and library facilities and services, and general improvements throughout the City, shall an ordinance to impose a tax at the rate of up to fifteen cents per each one dollar of proceeds or fractional part thereof on marijuana collectives and dispensaries operating in Cathedral city be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5288, "fingerprint": "2014|201400234|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400234|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7b1b29182084b9de", "measure_id": "201400234", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain community safety/quality neighborhoods by retaining police, firefighters and paramedics; replacing outdated fire trucks/ambulances; and maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response times, youth/senior services, parks and other general city services shall an ordinance be adopted updating Indio's existing transient occupancy tax, paid only by overnight hotel/lodging guests, be set at a uniform thirteen percent for all hotels (including campgrounds/vehicle parks), with annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9157, "no_votes": 2363, "total_votes": 11520, "percent_yes": 79.48784722222221, "percent_no": 20.512152777777786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.741015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.892286", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain community safety/quality neighborhoods by retaining police, firefighters and paramedics; replacing outdated fire trucks/ambulances; and maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response times, youth/senior services, parks and other general city services shall an ordinance be adopted updating Indio's existing transient occupancy tax, paid only by overnight hotel/lodging guests, be set at a uniform thirteen percent for all hotels (including campgrounds/vehicle parks), with annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5306, "fingerprint": "2014|201400509|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400509|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "95940a6320c1e5f0", "measure_id": "201400509", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, prepare students for four-year universities/high-skilled good paying jobs, improve facilities for career technical education, support veterans, nursing, agriculture programs, shall Palo Verde Community College District provide affordable local education, reduce campus construction debt to save money, repair, upgrade facilities/acquire equipment by issuing $12,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens' oversight, annual audits, no funds taken by the State and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1516, "no_votes": 894, "total_votes": 2410, "percent_yes": 62.90456431535269, "percent_no": 37.09543568464731, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.746379", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.895863", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, prepare students for four-year universities/high-skilled good paying jobs, improve facilities for career technical education, support veterans, nursing, agriculture programs, shall Palo Verde Community College District provide affordable local education, reduce campus construction debt to save money, repair, upgrade facilities/acquire equipment by issuing $12,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens' oversight, annual audits, no funds taken by the State and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5287, "fingerprint": "2014|201400233|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400233|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "58bd71e5589d7b8b", "measure_id": "201400233", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 2.08.170 be added to the Indian Wells Municipal Code to prohibit the City Council from taking any action which has the effect of allowing more than two through lanes in each direction on State Highway 111, unless approved by majority of City voters, except for lanes for bicycles, left and right turns, publicly owned and operated transit vehicles, and certain short acceleration or deceleration lanes from private property and residential complexes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1368, "no_votes": 494, "total_votes": 1862, "percent_yes": 73.46938775510205, "percent_no": 26.530612244897952, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.740712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.892092", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 2.08.170 be added to the Indian Wells Municipal Code to prohibit the City Council from taking any action which has the effect of allowing more than two through lanes in each direction on State Highway 111, unless approved by majority of City voters, except for lanes for bicycles, left and right turns, publicly owned and operated transit vehicles, and certain short acceleration or deceleration lanes from private property and residential complexes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5291, "fingerprint": "2014|201400259|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400259|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3382541691aee636", "measure_id": "201400259", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the City Council of Moreno Valley be elected by districts described in Ordinance 879, and the Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15312, "no_votes": 5278, "total_votes": 20590, "percent_yes": 74.36619718309859, "percent_no": 25.633802816901408, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.741836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.892866", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the City Council of Moreno Valley be elected by districts described in Ordinance 879, and the Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5292, "fingerprint": "2014|201400260|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400260|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "37447c28531850b4", "measure_id": "201400260", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12758, "no_votes": 7668, "total_votes": 20426, "percent_yes": 62.45961030059728, "percent_no": 37.54038969940272, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.742148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.893056", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5293, "fingerprint": "2014|201400261|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400261|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "acd7e5a9b92c5754", "measure_id": "201400261", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7537, "no_votes": 12718, "total_votes": 20255, "percent_yes": 37.21056529252036, "percent_no": 62.78943470747964, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.742469", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.893249", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5282, "fingerprint": "2014|201400188|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400188|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "bbe1678605d51f14", "measure_id": "201400188", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Coachella establish a retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one percent (1%) to maintain funding for general City services, including public safety, streets and public works, and parks/community services; provided that most of the tax is collected from non-Coachella residents, and no further rate increases without voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1605, "no_votes": 1562, "total_votes": 3167, "percent_yes": 50.67887590779918, "percent_no": 49.32112409220082, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.739135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.891099", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Coachella establish a retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one percent (1%) to maintain funding for general City services, including public safety, streets and public works, and parks/community services; provided that most of the tax is collected from non-Coachella residents, and no further rate increases without voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5283, "fingerprint": "2014|201400189|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400189|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "68c9add5d73c6763", "measure_id": "201400189", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term for the office of the Mayor be extended from two to four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1188, "no_votes": 1923, "total_votes": 3111, "percent_yes": 38.1870781099325, "percent_no": 61.8129218900675, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.739414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.891296", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term for the office of the Mayor be extended from two to four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5276, "fingerprint": "2014|201400172|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400172|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "6f271cf5f0784e55", "measure_id": "201400172", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Blythe increase its sales tax by one-half of one percent (0.5%) for a period of five years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 671, "no_votes": 1185, "total_votes": 1856, "percent_yes": 36.15301724137931, "percent_no": 63.84698275862069, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.737335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.889943", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Blythe increase its sales tax by one-half of one percent (0.5%) for a period of five years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5277, "fingerprint": "2014|201400173|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400173|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7de67f8688e83204", "measure_id": "201400173", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Blythe increase its transit occupancy tax (TOT) by 3%, to bring its transit occupancy tax to a rate of 13%, for a period of five years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 836, "no_votes": 999, "total_votes": 1835, "percent_yes": 45.55858310626703, "percent_no": 54.44141689373297, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.737640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.890137", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Blythe increase its transit occupancy tax (TOT) by 3%, to bring its transit occupancy tax to a rate of 13%, for a period of five years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5278, "fingerprint": "2014|201400174|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400174|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8a903aba0b4685d1", "measure_id": "201400174", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall road improvements and maintenance, the fire department, the police department, city promotion, community center enhancements, recreation center enhancements, and code enforcement (enhancing the appearance) be given priority in receipt of additional revenue generated, if either measure \"W\"(Sales Tax 0.5% Increase) or Measure \"X\" (Transit Occupancy Tax 3% Increase) or, if both of them, is/are approved by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1033, "no_votes": 794, "total_votes": 1827, "percent_yes": 56.5407772304324, "percent_no": 43.4592227695676, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.737940", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.890328", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall road improvements and maintenance, the fire department, the police department, city promotion, community center enhancements, recreation center enhancements, and code enforcement (enhancing the appearance) be given priority in receipt of additional revenue generated, if either measure \"W\"(Sales Tax 0.5% Increase) or Measure \"X\" (Transit Occupancy Tax 3% Increase) or, if both of them, is/are approved by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5279, "fingerprint": "2014|201400175|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400175|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7c25e53456cb7b51", "measure_id": "201400175", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 866-14 that would authorize and regulate medical cannabis businesses; charge each medical cannabis business a maximum of $10,000 per year for each business license issued; and tax each medical cannabis business at the maximum rate of fifteen cents for each $1.00 of proceeds collected and at a maximum monthly rate of $10 a square foot of cannabis cultivated, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 835, "no_votes": 1010, "total_votes": 1845, "percent_yes": 45.25745257452574, "percent_no": 54.74254742547426, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.738211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.890523", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 866-14 that would authorize and regulate medical cannabis businesses; charge each medical cannabis business a maximum of $10,000 per year for each business license issued; and tax each medical cannabis business at the maximum rate of fifteen cents for each $1.00 of proceeds collected and at a maximum monthly rate of $10 a square foot of cannabis cultivated, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5307, "fingerprint": "2014|201400128|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400128|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "f79b50f0338aded6", "measure_id": "201400128", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should library services for all City residents including children, teens, adults and seniors, be preserved, including after-school reading programs, homework assistance, library operating hours, 24/7 online access, programs for seniors, and other services, by enacting a new $12 per year single-family residential parcel tax for 12 years, and specified amounts for other uses, adjusted for inflation, that the State cannot take, with independent financial audits to ensure funds are spent only on City of Sacramento libraries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44222, "no_votes": 16336, "total_votes": 60558, "percent_yes": 73.02420819710031, "percent_no": 26.975791802899693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.746678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.896058", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should library services for all City residents including children, teens, adults and seniors, be preserved, including after-school reading programs, homework assistance, library operating hours, 24/7 online access, programs for seniors, and other services, by enacting a new $12 per year single-family residential parcel tax for 12 years, and specified amounts for other uses, adjusted for inflation, that the State cannot take, with independent financial audits to ensure funds are spent only on City of Sacramento libraries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5308, "fingerprint": "2014|201400218|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400218|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "fa583e6ca2cb0519", "measure_id": "201400218", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the city clerk for the City of Galt be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1891, "no_votes": 2171, "total_votes": 4062, "percent_yes": 46.5534219596258, "percent_no": 53.4465780403742, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.747056", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.896257", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the city clerk for the City of Galt be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5309, "fingerprint": "2014|201400237|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400237|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "c2d0de0e36ffd694", "measure_id": "201400237", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For a period of five (5) years shall a one-half cent transactions and use tax, to be used solely to fund Public Safety and Parks and Recreation projects and services for the City of Isleton, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 87, "no_votes": 59, "total_votes": 146, "percent_yes": 59.589041095890416, "percent_no": 40.410958904109584, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.747386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.896452", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For a period of five (5) years shall a one-half cent transactions and use tax, to be used solely to fund Public Safety and Parks and Recreation projects and services for the City of Isleton, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5310, "fingerprint": "2014|201400238|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400238|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "f9c577769c2589df", "measure_id": "201400238", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a one-tenth percent tax on business revenues to pay to pay for general services for the City of Isleton. Including fire, land-use planning and other city services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 88, "no_votes": 54, "total_votes": 142, "percent_yes": 61.97183098591549, "percent_no": 38.02816901408451, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.747703", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.896646", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a one-tenth percent tax on business revenues to pay to pay for general services for the City of Isleton. Including fire, land-use planning and other city services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5313, "fingerprint": "2014|201400461|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400461|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "9a4dda5f08893bef", "measure_id": "201400461", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade instructional technology, computer labs, student safety and security systems, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment to improve the quality of academic instruction in core subjects like math, science and writing, replace aging portable classrooms, and upgrade aging/inefficient electrical/HVAC systems to save money, shall Folsom Cordova Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 5 issue $195 million in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, annual audits, with all funds spent only in Folsom and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13332, "no_votes": 6018, "total_votes": 19350, "percent_yes": 68.89922480620156, "percent_no": 31.10077519379844, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.748548", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.897240", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade instructional technology, computer labs, student safety and security systems, construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment to improve the quality of academic instruction in core subjects like math, science and writing, replace aging portable classrooms, and upgrade aging/inefficient electrical/HVAC systems to save money, shall Folsom Cordova Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 5 issue $195 million in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, annual audits, with all funds spent only in Folsom and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5311, "fingerprint": "2014|201400301|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400301|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "7ef66f4d1f89cca0", "measure_id": "201400301", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To enhance City services, facilities and programs, including: enhancing anti-gang/youth violence prevention programs; increasing neighborhood police patrols; fixing streets faster; expanding children/teen after-school programs; removing blight/revitalizing vacant buildings along Folsom\r\nBoulevard; building community facilities for seniors/working adults/children; and other general city services; shall the City of Rancho Cordova enact a \u00bd cent sales tax, that cannot be taken by the State, requiring annual audits and all funds be spent in Rancho Cordova?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8092, "no_votes": 5076, "total_votes": 13168, "percent_yes": 61.45200486026732, "percent_no": 38.54799513973268, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.747983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.896836", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance City services, facilities and programs, including: enhancing anti-gang/youth violence prevention programs; increasing neighborhood police patrols; fixing streets faster; expanding children/teen after-school programs; removing blight/revitalizing vacant buildings along Folsom\r\nBoulevard; building community facilities for seniors/working adults/children; and other general city services; shall the City of Rancho Cordova enact a \u00bd cent sales tax, that cannot be taken by the State, requiring annual audits and all funds be spent in Rancho Cordova?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5314, "fingerprint": "2014|201400499|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400499|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "35ecb8b27fce90d1", "measure_id": "201400499", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education in Natomas, increasing student safety and security, improving accessibility for disabled students, upgrading classrooms for 21st century learning and college/career readiness with technology, furniture, and equipment, repairing and constructing school and support facilities, upgrading basic infrastructure/utilities and acquiring new school sites, shall Natomas Unified School District issue up to $129 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, annual\r\nindependent audits and no money for administrators' salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9091, "no_votes": 3515, "total_votes": 12606, "percent_yes": 72.11645248294462, "percent_no": 27.883547517055376, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.748890", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.897446", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education in Natomas, increasing student safety and security, improving accessibility for disabled students, upgrading classrooms for 21st century learning and college/career readiness with technology, furniture, and equipment, repairing and constructing school and support facilities, upgrading basic infrastructure/utilities and acquiring new school sites, shall Natomas Unified School District issue up to $129 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, annual\r\nindependent audits and no money for administrators' salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5315, "fingerprint": "2014|201400516|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400516|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "b666fe08af8c4fab", "measure_id": "201400516", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better integrate school facilities with the academic program, increase access to modern technology, improve school safety and security, replace portable classrooms with permanent construction, modernize classroom interiors to meet 21st century needs, construct a new school to relieve overcrowding, and qualify the District to receive State grants, shall Robla School District be authorized to issue $29,800,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no money for administrator salaries?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1694, "no_votes": 637, "total_votes": 2331, "percent_yes": 72.67267267267268, "percent_no": 27.327327327327325, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.749209", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.897638", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better integrate school facilities with the academic program, increase access to modern technology, improve school safety and security, replace portable classrooms with permanent construction, modernize classroom interiors to meet 21st century needs, construct a new school to relieve overcrowding, and qualify the District to receive State grants, shall Robla School District be authorized to issue $29,800,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no money for administrator salaries?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5312, "fingerprint": "2014|201400315|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400315|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "7c5c0b5edc46fee8", "measure_id": "201400315", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Sacramento Charter be revised, on a trial basis, to establish: a mayor-council governance structure wherein the elected mayor oversees city operations and a budget subject to Council approval and override; an Ethics Committee; Code of Ethics and Sunshine Ordinances; an Independent Budget Analyst Office; a Neighborhood Advisory Committee; an Independent Redistricting Commission; and a three-term limit for mayors; with most provisions subject to voter reapproval by 11/03/2020?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41423, "no_votes": 53252, "total_votes": 94675, "percent_yes": 43.75283865856879, "percent_no": 56.24716134143121, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.748265", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.897041", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Sacramento Charter be revised, on a trial basis, to establish: a mayor-council governance structure wherein the elected mayor oversees city operations and a budget subject to Council approval and override; an Ethics Committee; Code of Ethics and Sunshine Ordinances; an Independent Budget Analyst Office; a Neighborhood Advisory Committee; an Independent Redistricting Commission; and a three-term limit for mayors; with most provisions subject to voter reapproval by 11/03/2020?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5316, "fingerprint": "2014|201400018|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400018|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "a55bba00b7e4e19c", "measure_id": "201400018", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the San Benito County Vehicle Abatement Program and associated vehicle registration fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a 10-year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for the purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4443, "no_votes": 2583, "total_votes": 7026, "percent_yes": 63.23654995730145, "percent_no": 36.76345004269855, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.749492", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.897845", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the San Benito County Vehicle Abatement Program and associated vehicle registration fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a 10-year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for the purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5322, "fingerprint": "2014|201400413|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400413|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "3c7c8545e2cc9b70", "measure_id": "201400413", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local education by ensuring all San Benito High School students can access modern classrooms and educational tools, shall San Benito High School District: replace/upgrade classrooms and labs to prepare students for college and careers; repair roofs, plumbing and outdated electrical systems;\r\nadd 21st century instructional/vocational technology; improve school safety; improve access for persons with disabilities by issuing $42.5 million of bonds, with citizen oversight, audits, with NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3516, "no_votes": 2727, "total_votes": 6243, "percent_yes": 56.319077366650646, "percent_no": 43.680922633349354, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.752401", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.899019", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local education by ensuring all San Benito High School students can access modern classrooms and educational tools, shall San Benito High School District: replace/upgrade classrooms and labs to prepare students for college and careers; repair roofs, plumbing and outdated electrical systems;\r\nadd 21st century instructional/vocational technology; improve school safety; improve access for persons with disabilities by issuing $42.5 million of bonds, with citizen oversight, audits, with NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5317, "fingerprint": "2014|201400060|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400060|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "aac4cc22c9999216", "measure_id": "201400060", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the San Benito County Vehicle Abatement Program and associated vehicle registration fees ($1.00 per vehicle and an additional $2.00 for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a 10-year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for the purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8591, "no_votes": 4401, "total_votes": 12992, "percent_yes": 66.1253078817734, "percent_no": 33.874692118226605, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.749943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.898040", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the San Benito County Vehicle Abatement Program and associated vehicle registration fees ($1.00 per vehicle and an additional $2.00 for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a 10-year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for the purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5318, "fingerprint": "2014|201400061|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400061|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "26374931187a4d04", "measure_id": "201400061", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance, approved for submittal to the voters by San Benito County Resolution 2014-74, be adopted to amend the San Benito County Code to (1) increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from eight (8%) to twelve (12%) percent upon persons occupying hotels within the County\u2019s unincorporated area and (2) amend the definition of \u201coperator\u201d, so the tax is collected by all persons receiving consideration from the rental, including on-line hotel brokers and vacation rental agencies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4999, "no_votes": 7771, "total_votes": 12770, "percent_yes": 39.14643696162881, "percent_no": 60.85356303837119, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.750417", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.898235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance, approved for submittal to the voters by San Benito County Resolution 2014-74, be adopted to amend the San Benito County Code to (1) increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from eight (8%) to twelve (12%) percent upon persons occupying hotels within the County\u2019s unincorporated area and (2) amend the definition of \u201coperator\u201d, so the tax is collected by all persons receiving consideration from the rental, including on-line hotel brokers and vacation rental agencies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5319, "fingerprint": "2014|201400062|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400062|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "30c3c017ef1cc6f7", "measure_id": "201400062", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall San Benito County's General Plan be amended to ban High-Intensity Petroleum Operations (such as hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, acid well stimulation, and cyclic steam injection, but not Low-Intensity Petroleum Operations) throughout all unincorporated areas, and all Petroleum Operations in residential general plan designations of Rural, Rural Transitional, Rural Residential, Rural/Urban, and Sphere of Influence Rural/Urban, with related zoning changes to implement the new General Plan policies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8034, "no_votes": 5605, "total_votes": 13639, "percent_yes": 58.90461177505683, "percent_no": 41.09538822494317, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.750916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.898436", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall San Benito County's General Plan be amended to ban High-Intensity Petroleum Operations (such as hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, acid well stimulation, and cyclic steam injection, but not Low-Intensity Petroleum Operations) throughout all unincorporated areas, and all Petroleum Operations in residential general plan designations of Rural, Rural Transitional, Rural Residential, Rural/Urban, and Sphere of Influence Rural/Urban, with related zoning changes to implement the new General Plan policies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5320, "fingerprint": "2014|201400229|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400229|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201400229", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2799, "no_votes": 3936, "total_votes": 6735, "percent_yes": 41.55902004454343, "percent_no": 58.44097995545657, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.751387", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.898636", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11339, "fingerprint": "2014|201400473|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400473|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "f787407bc083e3dc", "measure_id": "201400473", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve conditions, avoid overcrowding, and accommodate growing student enrollment in all elementary and middle schools by upgrading schools, keeping neighborhood schools small and well-maintained, improving school safety and security, providing updated learning technology, maximizing energy efficiency, acquiring, constructing or equipping classrooms, facilities and sites, and bringing all facilities into ADA compliance shall the Hollister School District issue $28,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrator's salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5729, "no_votes": 3306, "total_votes": 9035, "percent_yes": 63.40896513558384, "percent_no": 36.59103486441616, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.914848", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.752876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.899211", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve conditions, avoid overcrowding, and accommodate growing student enrollment in all elementary and middle schools by upgrading schools, keeping neighborhood schools small and well-maintained, improving school safety and security, providing updated learning technology, maximizing energy efficiency, acquiring, constructing or equipping classrooms, facilities and sites, and bringing all facilities into ADA compliance shall the Hollister School District issue $28,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrator's salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5321, "fingerprint": "2014|201400230|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400230|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "58812b736d95256c", "measure_id": "201400230", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax be increased to twelve percent (12%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2121, "no_votes": 4469, "total_votes": 6590, "percent_yes": 32.18512898330804, "percent_no": 67.81487101669197, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.751862", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.898830", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax be increased to twelve percent (12%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5323, "fingerprint": "2014|201400095|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400095|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "511848f61deda3ce", "measure_id": "201400095", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance authorizing the sale of the Rimforest system by the City of Big Bear Lake Department of Water and Power to the Lake Arrowhead Community Services District be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 749, "no_votes": 240, "total_votes": 989, "percent_yes": 75.73306370070779, "percent_no": 24.26693629929221, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.753856", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.899824", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance authorizing the sale of the Rimforest system by the City of Big Bear Lake Department of Water and Power to the Lake Arrowhead Community Services District be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5324, "fingerprint": "2014|201400147|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400147|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f390304e3edc498e", "measure_id": "201400147", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 11.6 acres of vacant land from General Commercial to Residential-RD12, generally located south of Schaefer Avenue between Fern Avenue and Euclid Avenue, for a maximum of 127 single-family dwelling units?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1705, "no_votes": 1198, "total_votes": 2903, "percent_yes": 58.7323458491216, "percent_no": 41.2676541508784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-07-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.754358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.900093", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 11.6 acres of vacant land from General Commercial to Residential-RD12, generally located south of Schaefer Avenue between Fern Avenue and Euclid Avenue, for a maximum of 127 single-family dwelling units?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5325, "fingerprint": "2014|201400148|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400148|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "e056bd2e974cfbf2", "measure_id": "201400148", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 7.7 acres of vacant land from General Commercial to Residential-RD12 and change the land use designation of 1.5 acres of land from General Commercial to Residential/Agriculture-RD2, generally located on the east side of Central Avenue, approximately 600 feet north of Francis\r\nAvenue, for a maximum of 94 single-family dwelling units?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1731, "no_votes": 1168, "total_votes": 2899, "percent_yes": 59.71024491203863, "percent_no": 40.28975508796137, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-07-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.754858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.900277", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 7.7 acres of vacant land from General Commercial to Residential-RD12 and change the land use designation of 1.5 acres of land from General Commercial to Residential/Agriculture-RD2, generally located on the east side of Central Avenue, approximately 600 feet north of Francis\r\nAvenue, for a maximum of 94 single-family dwelling units?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5326, "fingerprint": "2014|201400149|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400149|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "22e56ab20a2669ba", "measure_id": "201400149", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 12.7 acres of land from Business Park to Residential-RD8, of 7.7 acres of land from Business Park to Residential-RD12 and of 18.1 acres of land from Residential- RD2 to Residential-RD4.5, generally located north of Eucalyptus Avenue between San Antonio Avenue and Euclid Avenue, for a maximum of 203 single-family dwelling units?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1671, "no_votes": 1227, "total_votes": 2898, "percent_yes": 57.66045548654244, "percent_no": 42.33954451345756, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-07-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.755346", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.900463", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 12.7 acres of land from Business Park to Residential-RD8, of 7.7 acres of land from Business Park to Residential-RD12 and of 18.1 acres of land from Residential- RD2 to Residential-RD4.5, generally located north of Eucalyptus Avenue between San Antonio Avenue and Euclid Avenue, for a maximum of 203 single-family dwelling units?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5334, "fingerprint": "2014|201400472|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400472|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b149798fa2907662", "measure_id": "201400472", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, renovate, acquire, construct and upgrade neighborhood schools/educational facilities, including upgrading career preparation/iob training facilities; upgrading classrooms/science labs/technology; upgrading fire safety including safety doors/sprinklers/smoke alarms; repairing deteriorating bathrooms/plumbing; and, removing asbestos/lead paint, shall the Hesperia Unified School District issue $207,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, and all money spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4970, "no_votes": 7920, "total_votes": 12890, "percent_yes": 38.557020946470125, "percent_no": 61.442979053529875, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.758441", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.901937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, renovate, acquire, construct and upgrade neighborhood schools/educational facilities, including upgrading career preparation/iob training facilities; upgrading classrooms/science labs/technology; upgrading fire safety including safety doors/sprinklers/smoke alarms; repairing deteriorating bathrooms/plumbing; and, removing asbestos/lead paint, shall the Hesperia Unified School District issue $207,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, and all money spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5333, "fingerprint": "2014|201400442|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400442|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "8953d35178bb84b1", "measure_id": "201400442", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade schools, attract/retain quality teachers, repair deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms/plumbing, remove asbestos, ensure safe drinking water, improve school safety, fire alarms/sprinklers, update electrical wiring/classroom technology, improve science/computer labs, and repair, construct/acquire, educational facilities, sites/equipment, shall Central School District issue $35 million in bonds, at legal rates, require independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, ensure all funds used locally, and not increase current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4140, "no_votes": 2030, "total_votes": 6170, "percent_yes": 67.09886547811993, "percent_no": 32.90113452188007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.758165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.901754", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade schools, attract/retain quality teachers, repair deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms/plumbing, remove asbestos, ensure safe drinking water, improve school safety, fire alarms/sprinklers, update electrical wiring/classroom technology, improve science/computer labs, and repair, construct/acquire, educational facilities, sites/equipment, shall Central School District issue $35 million in bonds, at legal rates, require independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, ensure all funds used locally, and not increase current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5327, "fingerprint": "2014|201400150|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400150|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6a2506b09eeaaeff", "measure_id": "201400150", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address Adelanto's Fiscal Emergency/prevent bankruptcy; prevent elimination of fire protection services; protect 9-1-1 emergency response, police protection, gang/crime prevention, senior services, and other essential general services; and to protect local businesses/jobs and restore fiscal stability; shall the City of Adelanto adopt a temporary 7.95% Utility Users Tax for 7 years only, with low income senior discounts, annual audits, citizens' oversight, and requiring funds be used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 787, "no_votes": 1349, "total_votes": 2136, "percent_yes": 36.84456928838952, "percent_no": 63.15543071161048, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.755780", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.900647", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address Adelanto's Fiscal Emergency/prevent bankruptcy; prevent elimination of fire protection services; protect 9-1-1 emergency response, police protection, gang/crime prevention, senior services, and other essential general services; and to protect local businesses/jobs and restore fiscal stability; shall the City of Adelanto adopt a temporary 7.95% Utility Users Tax for 7 years only, with low income senior discounts, annual audits, citizens' oversight, and requiring funds be used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5331, "fingerprint": "2014|201400319|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400319|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "edc7c4b2810ccf87", "measure_id": "201400319", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the amendment to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino that would eliminate a mandated automatic process for determining the salaries of the employees of the Police and Fire Departments of the City (hereinafter \"Public Safety Employees\") and replace that process with collective bargaining as provided by law be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8885, "no_votes": 10907, "total_votes": 19792, "percent_yes": 44.89187550525464, "percent_no": 55.10812449474536, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.757496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.901389", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the amendment to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino that would eliminate a mandated automatic process for determining the salaries of the employees of the Police and Fire Departments of the City (hereinafter \"Public Safety Employees\") and replace that process with collective bargaining as provided by law be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5332, "fingerprint": "2014|201400320|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400320|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "9e9ce81ae83aef3e", "measure_id": "201400320", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the amendment to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino altering the process by which city employees in the classified service may be discharged or reduced in rank or compensation be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10669, "no_votes": 8732, "total_votes": 19401, "percent_yes": 54.99201072109685, "percent_no": 45.00798927890315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.757883", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.901574", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the amendment to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino altering the process by which city employees in the classified service may be discharged or reduced in rank or compensation be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5329, "fingerprint": "2014|201400269|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400269|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "5a2ebf115e3f1363", "measure_id": "201400269", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending Chapter 20, Article III \"transient occupancy tax\" of the City of Needles municipal code to increase the rate of the city's existing transient occupancy tax from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%), and adding the definition of \"commercial establishment\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 280, "no_votes": 487, "total_votes": 767, "percent_yes": 36.50586701434159, "percent_no": 63.49413298565841, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.756704", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.901024", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending Chapter 20, Article III \"transient occupancy tax\" of the City of Needles municipal code to increase the rate of the city's existing transient occupancy tax from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%), and adding the definition of \"commercial establishment\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5328, "fingerprint": "2014|201400228|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400228|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "97b375391ae36160", "measure_id": "201400228", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the Legislative Body of the City of Highland be elected by districts as described in Ordinance No. 393?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2862, "no_votes": 3793, "total_votes": 6655, "percent_yes": 43.00525920360631, "percent_no": 56.99474079639369, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.756208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.900832", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the Legislative Body of the City of Highland be elected by districts as described in Ordinance No. 393?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5330, "fingerprint": "2014|201400310|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400310|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a3910e76be5f37ad", "measure_id": "201400310", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance adopting the Rialto 2014 Wholesale Liquid Fuel Storage Measure, amending Chapter 5.04 of the Rialto municipal code to establish a business license tax on wholesale liquid fuel storage facilities be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4917, "no_votes": 4680, "total_votes": 9597, "percent_yes": 51.23476086276961, "percent_no": 48.76523913723039, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.757130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.901203", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance adopting the Rialto 2014 Wholesale Liquid Fuel Storage Measure, amending Chapter 5.04 of the Rialto municipal code to establish a business license tax on wholesale liquid fuel storage facilities be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11341, "fingerprint": "2014|201400182|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400182|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ce58e63344d618c7", "measure_id": "201400182", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City's Charter provisions regarding public works and general purpose contracting be amended to replace specific contracting procedures with more general contracting principles that would be implemented by ordinance, including the requirement for competitive bidding, City Council approval of major contracts and other best practices, and the requirement that any exceptions to standard competitive purchasing practices be approved by 4/5ths vote of the City Council with findings of public benefit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27425, "no_votes": 8594, "total_votes": 36019, "percent_yes": 76.14037036008773, "percent_no": 23.85962963991227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.918888", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.780163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.903493", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's Charter provisions regarding public works and general purpose contracting be amended to replace specific contracting procedures with more general contracting principles that would be implemented by ordinance, including the requirement for competitive bidding, City Council approval of major contracts and other best practices, and the requirement that any exceptions to standard competitive purchasing practices be approved by 4/5ths vote of the City Council with findings of public benefit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5337, "fingerprint": "2014|201400130|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400130|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3f13be4c6392686a", "measure_id": "201400130", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to: (1) set a later date for elected officials to be sworn into office; (2) extend the deadlines to call special elections to fill vacancies for Mayor and City Council; and (3) make non-substantive revisions, to provide additional time to comply with state and federal deadlines to certify election results, provide mail ballots to military and overseas voters, and translate ballot materials?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120656, "no_votes": 45718, "total_votes": 166374, "percent_yes": 72.52094678255015, "percent_no": 27.479053217449845, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.779173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.902855", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to: (1) set a later date for elected officials to be sworn into office; (2) extend the deadlines to call special elections to fill vacancies for Mayor and City Council; and (3) make non-substantive revisions, to provide additional time to comply with state and federal deadlines to certify election results, provide mail ballots to military and overseas voters, and translate ballot materials?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11342, "fingerprint": "2014|201400183|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400183|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5c35214d1fdaa880", "measure_id": "201400183", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended so that, if a City Council seat becomes vacant with more than 12 months and less than 25 months remaining in the term, the Council may fill the vacancy by appointment or call a special election; and so that in any special election to fill a vacancy, a candidate receiving over 50% of votes cast is deemed the winner with no run-off required?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27756, "no_votes": 8955, "total_votes": 36711, "percent_yes": 75.60676636430497, "percent_no": 24.393233635695026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.919076", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.780465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.903677", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended so that, if a City Council seat becomes vacant with more than 12 months and less than 25 months remaining in the term, the Council may fill the vacancy by appointment or call a special election; and so that in any special election to fill a vacancy, a candidate receiving over 50% of votes cast is deemed the winner with no run-off required?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11340, "fingerprint": "2014|201400131|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400131|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "856ef25e14a6d654", "measure_id": "201400131", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. R-308445, which provides for a comprehensive update to the Barrio Logan Community Plan, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72637, "no_votes": 99161, "total_votes": 171798, "percent_yes": 42.28046892280468, "percent_no": 57.71953107719532, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.918504", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.779465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.903126", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. R-308445, which provides for a comprehensive update to the Barrio Logan Community Plan, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5336, "fingerprint": "2014|201400084|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400084|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f99a622e925ed176", "measure_id": "201400084", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance amending the Solana Beach Municipal Code to allow Special Use Permits to be issued for the Fletcher Cove Community Center be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1947, "no_votes": 1875, "total_votes": 3822, "percent_yes": 50.94191522762951, "percent_no": 49.05808477237049, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-02-11", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.778787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.902676", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance amending the Solana Beach Municipal Code to allow Special Use Permits to be issued for the Fletcher Cove Community Center be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11343, "fingerprint": "2014|201400440|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400440|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e9fb18ab23bc96e9", "measure_id": "201400440", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational technology; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; implement statewide technology requirements for testing and learning; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall Cajon Valley Union School District issue $20,000,000 of short-term bonds with the interest rates at or below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator/teacher salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13382, "no_votes": 13884, "total_votes": 27266, "percent_yes": 49.07943959510012, "percent_no": 50.92056040489988, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.920777", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.783438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.905326", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational technology; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; implement statewide technology requirements for testing and learning; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall Cajon Valley Union School District issue $20,000,000 of short-term bonds with the interest rates at or below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator/teacher salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5338, "fingerprint": "2014|201400132|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400132|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bbca67e627d83a85", "measure_id": "201400132", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinances 0-20312 and 0-20313, which amend the San Diego Municipal Code related to the Barrio Logan Community Plan Update, and affect the zoning of 999.61 acres located within the Barrio Logan Community Plan Area, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68677, "no_votes": 102385, "total_votes": 171062, "percent_yes": 40.14743192526686, "percent_no": 59.85256807473314, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.779885", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.903311", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinances 0-20312 and 0-20313, which amend the San Diego Municipal Code related to the Barrio Logan Community Plan Update, and affect the zoning of 999.61 acres located within the Barrio Logan Community Plan Area, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5345, "fingerprint": "2014|201400268|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400268|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a3506050cb989702", "measure_id": "201400268", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "National City Continuation of City Services Funding Measure. To maintain National City's public safety and prevent cuts to neighborhood police patrols and officers; gang/drug prevention; 911 emergency response; fire protection and firefighters; graffiti removal; street/pothole repair; senior/youth/library programs; and other City services; shall National City continue its existing voter-approved one-cent sales tax for 20 years with Citizens' Oversight, annual independent audits, all money kept in National City, with no increase in tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4355, "no_votes": 1993, "total_votes": 6348, "percent_yes": 68.60428481411468, "percent_no": 31.395715185885322, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.782837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.904956", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "National City Continuation of City Services Funding Measure. To maintain National City's public safety and prevent cuts to neighborhood police patrols and officers; gang/drug prevention; 911 emergency response; fire protection and firefighters; graffiti removal; street/pothole repair; senior/youth/library programs; and other City services; shall National City continue its existing voter-approved one-cent sales tax for 20 years with Citizens' Oversight, annual independent audits, all money kept in National City, with no increase in tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11344, "fingerprint": "2014|201400457|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400457|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6023aecb8fc4e98f", "measure_id": "201400457", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Maintain Quality Education in Escondido Measure. \"To repair/replace outdated classrooms/school buildings with safe, modernized facilities, improve student safety/campus security, keep technology infrastructure up-to-date in K-8 classrooms, science labs, libraries/computer systems, acquire, construct, repair classrooms, sites/equipment, provide all students with access to the education, facilities, and technology needed to succeed in high school/college, shall Escondido Union School District issue $182,100,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all money for Escondido elementary/middle schools?\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18615, "no_votes": 14072, "total_votes": 32687, "percent_yes": 56.949245877566, "percent_no": 43.050754122434, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.920966", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.783842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.905511", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Maintain Quality Education in Escondido Measure. \"To repair/replace outdated classrooms/school buildings with safe, modernized facilities, improve student safety/campus security, keep technology infrastructure up-to-date in K-8 classrooms, science labs, libraries/computer systems, acquire, construct, repair classrooms, sites/equipment, provide all students with access to the education, facilities, and technology needed to succeed in high school/college, shall Escondido Union School District issue $182,100,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and all money for Escondido elementary/middle schools?\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5346, "fingerprint": "2014|201400382|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400382|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "295ca4c786d8d6d1", "measure_id": "201400382", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide modern classroom technology and facilities students need for college/career success, continue advanced programs in math, science and the arts, acquire, construct and repair classrooms/facilities/sites/equipment, permit smaller classes, and protect Coronado's quality of education, shall Coronado Unified School District issue up to $29,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with maturities under 5 years, all bonds repaid by September 30, 2024, less than $13,200,000 outstanding at any time, independent citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2275, "no_votes": 3141, "total_votes": 5416, "percent_yes": 42.00516986706056, "percent_no": 57.99483013293944, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.783116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.905141", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide modern classroom technology and facilities students need for college/career success, continue advanced programs in math, science and the arts, acquire, construct and repair classrooms/facilities/sites/equipment, permit smaller classes, and protect Coronado's quality of education, shall Coronado Unified School District issue up to $29,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with maturities under 5 years, all bonds repaid by September 30, 2024, less than $13,200,000 outstanding at any time, independent citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5339, "fingerprint": "2014|201400207|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400207|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "32434c63f4d7c922", "measure_id": "201400207", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the Encinitas Municipal Code to authorize and regulate medical marijuana dispensaries in the City of Encinitas be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8337, "no_votes": 10496, "total_votes": 18833, "percent_yes": 44.2680401423034, "percent_no": 55.7319598576966, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.780772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.903863", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the Encinitas Municipal Code to authorize and regulate medical marijuana dispensaries in the City of Encinitas be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5340, "fingerprint": "2014|201400208|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400208|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "0d543c5b28855e3f", "measure_id": "201400208", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Escondido be changed from a general law city to a charter city through the adoption of the charter proposed by Resolution 2014-70 of the Escondido City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9629, "no_votes": 16229, "total_votes": 25858, "percent_yes": 37.23799211075876, "percent_no": 62.76200788924124, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.781072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.904047", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Escondido be changed from a general law city to a charter city through the adoption of the charter proposed by Resolution 2014-70 of the Escondido City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5341, "fingerprint": "2014|201400209|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400209|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f5b7b63dc3ee2e18", "measure_id": "201400209", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the City of Escondido approve the following: An initiative measure to adopt the Lakes Specific Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10675, "no_votes": 16442, "total_votes": 27117, "percent_yes": 39.36644909097614, "percent_no": 60.63355090902386, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.781375", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.904229", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the City of Escondido approve the following: An initiative measure to adopt the Lakes Specific Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5342, "fingerprint": "2014|201400241|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400241|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a431b2a32ddc09ae", "measure_id": "201400241", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance amending the La Mesa Municipal Code to authorize and regulate medical marijuana dispensaries in the City of La Mesa be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6450, "no_votes": 7452, "total_votes": 13902, "percent_yes": 46.39620198532585, "percent_no": 53.60379801467415, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.781720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.904412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance amending the La Mesa Municipal Code to authorize and regulate medical marijuana dispensaries in the City of La Mesa be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5343, "fingerprint": "2014|201400242|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400242|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b7e31fff6741b993", "measure_id": "201400242", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance amending the La Mesa Municipal Code to impose a three consecutive terms limit on the office of City Council Member, Mayor or any combination of terms thereof be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9023, "no_votes": 4534, "total_votes": 13557, "percent_yes": 66.5560227188906, "percent_no": 33.4439772811094, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.782202", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.904594", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance amending the La Mesa Municipal Code to impose a three consecutive terms limit on the office of City Council Member, Mayor or any combination of terms thereof be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5347, "fingerprint": "2014|201400481|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400481|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "eba3d0b95dd5f567", "measure_id": "201400481", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student access to classroom computers; upgrade /construct science labs throughout the district; renovate /modernize classrooms/facilities; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $31,000,000 of Lakeside Union School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and no money taken by the State and spent elsewhere or used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5640, "no_votes": 3990, "total_votes": 9630, "percent_yes": 58.56697819314641, "percent_no": 41.43302180685359, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.784121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.905698", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student access to classroom computers; upgrade /construct science labs throughout the district; renovate /modernize classrooms/facilities; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $31,000,000 of Lakeside Union School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and no money taken by the State and spent elsewhere or used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5344, "fingerprint": "2014|201400243|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400243|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201400243", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6617, "no_votes": 6276, "total_votes": 12893, "percent_yes": 51.32242302024355, "percent_no": 48.67757697975645, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.782526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.904773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5349, "fingerprint": "2014|201400498|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400498|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c2b6848034782d16", "measure_id": "201400498", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and rebuild aging classrooms and facilities throughout the District; meet handicapped access requirements, increase student access to computers and modern technology; and upgrade outdated heating and air conditioning systems; shall the National School District be authorized to issue $26.1 million of bonds with legal interest rates, annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4620, "no_votes": 1259, "total_votes": 5879, "percent_yes": 78.58479333219935, "percent_no": 21.415206667800646, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.784738", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.906058", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and rebuild aging classrooms and facilities throughout the District; meet handicapped access requirements, increase student access to computers and modern technology; and upgrade outdated heating and air conditioning systems; shall the National School District be authorized to issue $26.1 million of bonds with legal interest rates, annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5351, "fingerprint": "2014|201400541|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400541|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "93161affe1141fba", "measure_id": "201400541", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Vallecitos School District issue $2,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and with NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 299, "no_votes": 260, "total_votes": 559, "percent_yes": 53.48837209302325, "percent_no": 46.51162790697675, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.785355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.906430", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational facilities with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Vallecitos School District issue $2,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and with NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5350, "fingerprint": "2014|201400513|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400513|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "8bdbb196051db2c3", "measure_id": "201400513", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education in Ramona by modernizing classrooms, restrooms and facilities, repairing or replacing roofs, deteriorating portable classrooms, electrical and plumbing systems; and provide critical General Fund relief by paying off District loans to construct schools and make school improvements; shall Ramona Unified School District issue $40,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, ensuring NO MONEY to employee salaries or the state, and ALL funds spent on Ramona schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4802, "no_votes": 5488, "total_votes": 10290, "percent_yes": 46.66666666666666, "percent_no": 53.33333333333334, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.785080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.906245", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education in Ramona by modernizing classrooms, restrooms and facilities, repairing or replacing roofs, deteriorating portable classrooms, electrical and plumbing systems; and provide critical General Fund relief by paying off District loans to construct schools and make school improvements; shall Ramona Unified School District issue $40,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, ensuring NO MONEY to employee salaries or the state, and ALL funds spent on Ramona schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5348, "fingerprint": "2014|201400483|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400483|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "0c514f2e675066a4", "measure_id": "201400483", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and replace leaky roofs; renovate and modernize educational facilities; provide additional classrooms; and increase student access to classroom computers; shall $10,000,000 of Lemon Grove School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, reduced borrowing costs, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and no money taken by the State and spent elsewhere or used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4323, "no_votes": 1693, "total_votes": 6016, "percent_yes": 71.85837765957447, "percent_no": 28.141622340425528, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.784425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.905878", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and replace leaky roofs; renovate and modernize educational facilities; provide additional classrooms; and increase student access to classroom computers; shall $10,000,000 of Lemon Grove School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, reduced borrowing costs, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and no money taken by the State and spent elsewhere or used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5335, "fingerprint": "2014|201400059|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400059|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "2df58b73987cc784", "measure_id": "201400059", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Rincon Rancho Community Services District be authorized to establish and levy a special tax override, on all taxable real property within its boundaries for the purpose of providing funds for repair and resurface of the roads maintained by the district, with this special tax not to exceed five dollars and twenty cents ($5.20) per acre, or portion thereof, plus one hundred fifty dollars ($150) per parcel of land per year with a provision for an annual increase not to exceed the annual engineering news record (ENR) for the prior year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27, "no_votes": 15, "total_votes": 42, "percent_yes": 64.28571428571429, "percent_no": 35.71428571428571, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.778305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.902489", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Rincon Rancho Community Services District be authorized to establish and levy a special tax override, on all taxable real property within its boundaries for the purpose of providing funds for repair and resurface of the roads maintained by the district, with this special tax not to exceed five dollars and twenty cents ($5.20) per acre, or portion thereof, plus one hundred fifty dollars ($150) per parcel of land per year with a provision for an annual increase not to exceed the annual engineering news record (ENR) for the prior year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11345, "fingerprint": "2014|201400071|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400071|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0999338890d48df4", "measure_id": "201400071", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To construct, redesign and rebuild streets and sidewalks and to make infrastructure repairs and improvements that increase MUNI service reliability, ease traffic congestion, reduce vehicle travel times, enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety, and improve disabled access, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $500 million in general obligation bonds, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 157562, "no_votes": 61657, "total_votes": 219219, "percent_yes": 71.8742444769842, "percent_no": 28.125755523015798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.922474", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.786362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.906970", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, redesign and rebuild streets and sidewalks and to make infrastructure repairs and improvements that increase MUNI service reliability, ease traffic congestion, reduce vehicle travel times, enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety, and improve disabled access, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $500 million in general obligation bonds, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5352, "fingerprint": "2014|201400019|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400019|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "49d17a0a17ebdb5a", "measure_id": "201400019", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve fire, earthquake and emergency response by: improving and/or replacing deteriorating cisterns, pipes, and tunnels, and related facilities to ensure firefighters a reliable water supply for fires and disasters; improving and/or replacing neighborhood fire and police stations; replacing certain seismically-unsafe police and medical examiner facilities with earthquake-safe buildings and to pay related costs, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $400,000,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 96137, "no_votes": 25491, "total_votes": 121628, "percent_yes": 79.04183247278587, "percent_no": 20.95816752721413, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.785663", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.906613", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve fire, earthquake and emergency response by: improving and/or replacing deteriorating cisterns, pipes, and tunnels, and related facilities to ensure firefighters a reliable water supply for fires and disasters; improving and/or replacing neighborhood fire and police stations; replacing certain seismically-unsafe police and medical examiner facilities with earthquake-safe buildings and to pay related costs, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $400,000,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11346, "fingerprint": "2014|201400072|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400072|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b7a6d75e12cb2622", "measure_id": "201400072", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to increase the amount the City provides to the Municipal Transportation Agency based on increases in the City's population, with such funds to be used to improve Muni and to improve street safety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 132650, "no_votes": 83413, "total_votes": 216063, "percent_yes": 61.394130415665806, "percent_no": 38.605869584334194, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.922660", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.786682", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.907149", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to increase the amount the City provides to the Municipal Transportation Agency based on increases in the City's population, with such funds to be used to improve Muni and to improve street safety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5353, "fingerprint": "2014|201400020|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400020|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1b2be5d8b7f53659", "measure_id": "201400020", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City be prevented from allowing any development on Port property to exceed the height limits in effect as of January 1, 2014, unless the City's voters have approved a height limit increase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71421, "no_votes": 49870, "total_votes": 121291, "percent_yes": 58.88400623294391, "percent_no": 41.11599376705609, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.786015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.906792", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City be prevented from allowing any development on Port property to exceed the height limits in effect as of January 1, 2014, unless the City's voters have approved a height limit increase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5354, "fingerprint": "2014|201400073|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400073|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f22a003a621913ca", "measure_id": "201400073", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to support services to children, youth, and their families by extending the Children's Fund for 25 years and increasing its funding; extending the Public Education Enrichment Fund for 26 years; creating an Our Children, Our Families Council; and dividing the existing Rainy Day Reserve into a City Rainy Day Reserve and a School District Rainy Day Reserve?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 159800, "no_votes": 54880, "total_votes": 214680, "percent_yes": 74.43637041177567, "percent_no": 25.56362958822433, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.786955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.907326", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to support services to children, youth, and their families by extending the Children's Fund for 25 years and increasing its funding; extending the Public Education Enrichment Fund for 26 years; creating an Our Children, Our Families Council; and dividing the existing Rainy Day Reserve into a City Rainy Day Reserve and a School District Rainy Day Reserve?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5355, "fingerprint": "2014|201400074|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400074|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "21fc8a6b86335e98", "measure_id": "201400074", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Charter to make retiree health care benefits available to certain employees of the former San Francisco Redevelopment Agency and the Successor Agency?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117283, "no_votes": 91680, "total_votes": 208963, "percent_yes": 56.12620416054517, "percent_no": 43.87379583945483, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.787226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.907508", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Charter to make retiree health care benefits available to certain employees of the former San Francisco Redevelopment Agency and the Successor Agency?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5356, "fingerprint": "2014|201400075|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400075|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f7890365061a4809", "measure_id": "201400075", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City collect a tax of 2 cents per ounce from the distributors of sugar-sweetened beverages to fund health, nutrition, physical education and active recreation programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 123475, "no_votes": 98625, "total_votes": 222100, "percent_yes": 55.594326879783885, "percent_no": 44.405673120216115, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.787495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.907694", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City collect a tax of 2 cents per ounce from the distributors of sugar-sweetened beverages to fund health, nutrition, physical education and active recreation programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5357, "fingerprint": "2014|201400076|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400076|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "e7a81108d4c0f256", "measure_id": "201400076", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase the height limit for new buildings on the 28-acre development site in the Pier 70 area from 40 feet to 90 feet; and shall it be City policy to encourage the City to proceed with public approval processes, including environmental review, for this mixed-use project, and encourage parks, housing, cultural space, and job creation for this site?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 158729, "no_votes": 59149, "total_votes": 217878, "percent_yes": 72.85223840865072, "percent_no": 27.14776159134928, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.787768", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.907874", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the height limit for new buildings on the 28-acre development site in the Pier 70 area from 40 feet to 90 feet; and shall it be City policy to encourage the City to proceed with public approval processes, including environmental review, for this mixed-use project, and encourage parks, housing, cultural space, and job creation for this site?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5358, "fingerprint": "2014|201400077|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400077|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "cb733608180b66bc", "measure_id": "201400077", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City impose an additional tax of between 14% and 24% on the total sale price of certain multi-unit residential properties that are sold within five years of purchase or transfer, subject to certain exceptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 100776, "no_votes": 117887, "total_votes": 218663, "percent_yes": 46.08735817216447, "percent_no": 53.91264182783553, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.788135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.908057", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City impose an additional tax of between 14% and 24% on the total sale price of certain multi-unit residential properties that are sold within five years of purchase or transfer, subject to certain exceptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5359, "fingerprint": "2014|201400078|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400078|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "84b9527b67de45d7", "measure_id": "201400078", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City be required to keep natural grass at all athletic fields in Golden Gate Park west of Crossover Drive and to prohibit nighttime sports field lighting in these areas?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 98555, "no_votes": 119519, "total_votes": 218074, "percent_yes": 45.19337472601044, "percent_no": 54.80662527398956, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.788461", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.908240", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City be required to keep natural grass at all athletic fields in Golden Gate Park west of Crossover Drive and to prohibit nighttime sports field lighting in these areas?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5360, "fingerprint": "2014|201400079|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400079|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "42732d1b2cdbc107", "measure_id": "201400079", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City allow renovations to children's playgrounds, walking trails and athletic fields if such renovations, which could include installing artificial turf or nighttime lighting on athletic fields, would double their anticipated usage and if an environmental impact report has been certified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120884, "no_votes": 98057, "total_votes": 218941, "percent_yes": 55.21304826414423, "percent_no": 44.78695173585577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.788766", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.908424", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City allow renovations to children's playgrounds, walking trails and athletic fields if such renovations, which could include installing artificial turf or nighttime lighting on athletic fields, would double their anticipated usage and if an environmental impact report has been certified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5361, "fingerprint": "2014|201400080|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400080|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "04045f16284e9cc6", "measure_id": "201400080", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City gradually increase the minimum wage to $15 per hour by July 1, 2018, with further increases based on inflation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 174143, "no_votes": 50771, "total_votes": 224914, "percent_yes": 77.4264830112843, "percent_no": 22.573516988715696, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.789074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.908604", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City gradually increase the minimum wage to $15 per hour by July 1, 2018, with further increases based on inflation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5362, "fingerprint": "2014|201400081|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400081|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9abefcc92b30d670", "measure_id": "201400081", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to help construct or rehabilitate at least 30,000 homes by 2020, more than 50% of which will be affordable for middle-class households and more than 33% of which will be affordable for low- and moderate-income households, and secure sufficient funding to achieve that goal?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143582, "no_votes": 75430, "total_votes": 219012, "percent_yes": 65.55896480558144, "percent_no": 34.44103519441856, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.789374", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.908787", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to help construct or rehabilitate at least 30,000 homes by 2020, more than 50% of which will be affordable for middle-class households and more than 33% of which will be affordable for low- and moderate-income households, and secure sufficient funding to achieve that goal?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5363, "fingerprint": "2014|201400082|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400082|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "144593dcc506dca9", "measure_id": "201400082", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to change parking and transportation priorities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 79417, "no_votes": 134878, "total_votes": 214295, "percent_yes": 37.059660748034254, "percent_no": 62.940339251965746, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.789677", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.908971", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to change parking and transportation priorities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5365, "fingerprint": "2014|201400418|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400418|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "638fae2b9b7e879e", "measure_id": "201400418", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue the renovation and modernization of Tracy schools by upgrading older classrooms, libraries and computer labs, replacing leaking and deteriorating roofs, updating heating, plumbing and electrical systems and improving school safety and security, shall Tracy Unified School District be authorized to issue $82,000,000 in bonds for School Facilities Improvement District No. 3, at legal interest rates, with all expenditures monitored by an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee and no funds spent on administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4570, "no_votes": 2458, "total_votes": 7028, "percent_yes": 65.02561183836085, "percent_no": 34.974388161639155, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.791134", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.909347", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue the renovation and modernization of Tracy schools by upgrading older classrooms, libraries and computer labs, replacing leaking and deteriorating roofs, updating heating, plumbing and electrical systems and improving school safety and security, shall Tracy Unified School District be authorized to issue $82,000,000 in bonds for School Facilities Improvement District No. 3, at legal interest rates, with all expenditures monitored by an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee and no funds spent on administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5364, "fingerprint": "2014|201400349|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400349|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "95122339a8ac3f75", "measure_id": "201400349", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be amended to revise the Introduction; amend criteria for determining the Mayor\u2019s compensation; revise certain restrictions on, and benefits of, officers and employees; delete certain requirements as to the qualifications and process for selection of certain Fire Department and other employees; revise certain public bidding procedures and delegate to the City Council the determination of the administrative spending authority of the City Manager?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21370, "no_votes": 15094, "total_votes": 36464, "percent_yes": 58.605748135147, "percent_no": 41.394251864853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.790000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.909151", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be amended to revise the Introduction; amend criteria for determining the Mayor\u2019s compensation; revise certain restrictions on, and benefits of, officers and employees; delete certain requirements as to the qualifications and process for selection of certain Fire Department and other employees; revise certain public bidding procedures and delegate to the City Council the determination of the administrative spending authority of the City Manager?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5369, "fingerprint": "2014|201400534|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400534|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "a704899c03c04aee", "measure_id": "201400534", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational technology; upgrade classroom security systems for increased student safety; upgrade technology servers, routers, switches and storage area networks; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall Stockton Unified School District issue $114,000,000 of short-term bonds with the interest rates at or below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13960, "no_votes": 6854, "total_votes": 20814, "percent_yes": 67.07024118381858, "percent_no": 32.92975881618142, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.793306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.910091", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational technology; upgrade classroom security systems for increased student safety; upgrade technology servers, routers, switches and storage area networks; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall Stockton Unified School District issue $114,000,000 of short-term bonds with the interest rates at or below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5366, "fingerprint": "2014|201400488|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400488|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "cda6ecdbb961c059", "measure_id": "201400488", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms to meet modern academic, technology and safety standards; repair faulty electrical systems, air conditioning, leaky roofs, plumbing and restrooms; improve fire safety systems and school security; remove asbestos and lead paint; and repair, construct, and acquire educational facilities and equipment, shall the Manteca Unified School District issue $159 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, annual independent audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10950, "no_votes": 7742, "total_votes": 18692, "percent_yes": 58.5812112133533, "percent_no": 41.4187887866467, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.792021", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.909535", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms to meet modern academic, technology and safety standards; repair faulty electrical systems, air conditioning, leaky roofs, plumbing and restrooms; improve fire safety systems and school security; remove asbestos and lead paint; and repair, construct, and acquire educational facilities and equipment, shall the Manteca Unified School District issue $159 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, annual independent audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5368, "fingerprint": "2014|201400515|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400515|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "265b2f3700896c24", "measure_id": "201400515", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the election of one member of the governing board of the Ripon Unified School District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2430, "no_votes": 2077, "total_votes": 4507, "percent_yes": 53.9161304637231, "percent_no": 46.0838695362769, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.792877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.909909", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the election of one member of the governing board of the Ripon Unified School District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5367, "fingerprint": "2014|201400489|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400489|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "85c9e8d7bc6449bc", "measure_id": "201400489", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the election of one member of the governing board of the Manteca Unified School District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11854, "no_votes": 6022, "total_votes": 17876, "percent_yes": 66.31237413291564, "percent_no": 33.687625867084364, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.792443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.909728", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the election of one member of the governing board of the Manteca Unified School District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5378, "fingerprint": "2014|201400431|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400431|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "177f21454224cd8b", "measure_id": "201400431", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue the work of Measure I-10 by modernizing and expanding vocational education facilities, repairing aging schools throughout the District, improving student computer access, and constructing a high school science, technology, engineering and mathematics facility, shall $58 million of Atascadero Unified School District bonds, previously approved in November 2010, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with interest rates below legal limits, independent citizens oversight, no money for administrator salaries and no increase in total authorized District debt?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7102, "no_votes": 4415, "total_votes": 11517, "percent_yes": 61.665364244160806, "percent_no": 38.334635755839194, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.797535", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.911749", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue the work of Measure I-10 by modernizing and expanding vocational education facilities, repairing aging schools throughout the District, improving student computer access, and constructing a high school science, technology, engineering and mathematics facility, shall $58 million of Atascadero Unified School District bonds, previously approved in November 2010, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds with interest rates below legal limits, independent citizens oversight, no money for administrator salaries and no increase in total authorized District debt?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5370, "fingerprint": "2014|201400156|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400156|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "26e23ff68e76a107", "measure_id": "201400156", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "WE THE PEOPLE of the City of Arroyo Grande declare our intent to restore our community to the historic principles of self-governance inherent in the doctrine of home-rule. Sincerely committed to the belief that local government has the closest affinity to the people governed, and firm in the conviction that the economic and fiscal independence of our local government will promote the health, safety and welfare of all the citizens of this City and better preserve its small town character and agricultural heritage, we do hereby exercise the express right granted by the Constitution of the State of California to enact and adopt this Charter for the City of Arroyo Grande.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2366, "no_votes": 4374, "total_votes": 6740, "percent_yes": 35.103857566765576, "percent_no": 64.89614243323442, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.793934", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.910278", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "WE THE PEOPLE of the City of Arroyo Grande declare our intent to restore our community to the historic principles of self-governance inherent in the doctrine of home-rule. Sincerely committed to the belief that local government has the closest affinity to the people governed, and firm in the conviction that the economic and fiscal independence of our local government will promote the health, safety and welfare of all the citizens of this City and better preserve its small town character and agricultural heritage, we do hereby exercise the express right granted by the Constitution of the State of California to enact and adopt this Charter for the City of Arroyo Grande.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5379, "fingerprint": "2014|201400520|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400520|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "bbd751731f5647b0", "measure_id": "201400520", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting on the proposition, the San Luis Coastal Unified School District (the \"District\") shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $177 million in aggregate principal amounts to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed in the Bond Project List below, and in order to qualify to receive State matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified below. By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting on the proposition, the San Luis Coastal Unified School District (the \"District\") shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $177 million in aggregate principal amounts to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed in the Bond Project List below, and in order to qualify to receive State matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified below.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18400, "no_votes": 7236, "total_votes": 25636, "percent_yes": 71.77406771727259, "percent_no": 28.225932282727413, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.797994", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.911932", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting on the proposition, the San Luis Coastal Unified School District (the \"District\") shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $177 million in aggregate principal amounts to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed in the Bond Project List below, and in order to qualify to receive State matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified below. By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting on the proposition, the San Luis Coastal Unified School District (the \"District\") shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $177 million in aggregate principal amounts to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed in the Bond Project List below, and in order to qualify to receive State matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified below.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5371, "fingerprint": "2014|201400158|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400158|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "c324d7e8c59d6464", "measure_id": "201400158", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Measure E-14 is an advisory vote concerning the expenditure of any revenue from the proposed new City of Atascadero transactions and use tax (Measure F-14), if that Measure is approved by the voters.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6269, "no_votes": 2705, "total_votes": 8974, "percent_yes": 69.85736572320036, "percent_no": 30.14263427679964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.794497", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.910464", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Measure E-14 is an advisory vote concerning the expenditure of any revenue from the proposed new City of Atascadero transactions and use tax (Measure F-14), if that Measure is approved by the voters.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5372, "fingerprint": "2014|201400159|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400159|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "629b9c6ff154cd5d", "measure_id": "201400159", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The proposed tax would be a \"general tax,\" meaning that revenues raised from the tax would go into the City's general fund to fund any lawful City program, improvement, or service, including, but not limited to, the repair of neighborhood roads and aging roadways and other vital City services. The City would not be required to use the revenues raised by the measure for any special purpose or for any particular program or service.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5342, "no_votes": 3691, "total_votes": 9033, "percent_yes": 59.1387136056681, "percent_no": 40.8612863943319, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.794955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.910646", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The proposed tax would be a \"general tax,\" meaning that revenues raised from the tax would go into the City's general fund to fund any lawful City program, improvement, or service, including, but not limited to, the repair of neighborhood roads and aging roadways and other vital City services. The City would not be required to use the revenues raised by the measure for any special purpose or for any particular program or service.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5377, "fingerprint": "2014|201400328|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400328|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "8273a788ea4c0484", "measure_id": "201400328", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "An ordinance of the City Council and the People of the City of San Lyis Obispo, California, amending Chaapter 3.15 of the Municipal Code to extend the existing \"Essential Services Transactions (Sales) and Use Tax,\" for an additional eight years (March 31, 2023), to be administered by the State Board of Equalization, update the purpose statement, and provide for additional citizen oversight and accounting transparency.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8728, "no_votes": 3684, "total_votes": 12412, "percent_yes": 70.31904608443442, "percent_no": 29.68095391556558, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.797223", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.911567", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "An ordinance of the City Council and the People of the City of San Lyis Obispo, California, amending Chaapter 3.15 of the Municipal Code to extend the existing \"Essential Services Transactions (Sales) and Use Tax,\" for an additional eight years (March 31, 2023), to be administered by the State Board of Equalization, update the purpose statement, and provide for additional citizen oversight and accounting transparency.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5375, "fingerprint": "2014|201400294|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400294|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "076996eb0d632354", "measure_id": "201400294", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) If approved by the voters, Measure H-14, entitled \"An Initiative of the People of the City of Pismo Beach Amending the City's General Plan to Alter Development Standards Within the City's Sphere of Influence in Planning Area R and Other Specified Areas\", will alter existing development standards for properties within the City of Pismo Beach General Plan's Planning Area R, and in other areas of the City's sphere of influence outside Planning Area R. Under the current General Plan, Planning Area R consists of three properties in Price Canyon, a total of about 890 acres. The initiative adds another 250 acre parcel to Planning Area R.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2068, "no_votes": 1133, "total_votes": 3201, "percent_yes": 64.60481099656357, "percent_no": 35.39518900343643, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.796622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.911200", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) If approved by the voters, Measure H-14, entitled \"An Initiative of the People of the City of Pismo Beach Amending the City's General Plan to Alter Development Standards Within the City's Sphere of Influence in Planning Area R and Other Specified Areas\", will alter existing development standards for properties within the City of Pismo Beach General Plan's Planning Area R, and in other areas of the City's sphere of influence outside Planning Area R. Under the current General Plan, Planning Area R consists of three properties in Price Canyon, a total of about 890 acres. The initiative adds another 250 acre parcel to Planning Area R.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5376, "fingerprint": "2014|201400295|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400295|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "36602b43859616ea", "measure_id": "201400295", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If approved by the voters, Measure I-14, entitled \"The Pismo Beach Vital Public Service Protection Measure\", would amend the Pismo Beach Municipal Code to extend the current retail transactions and use tax within the City that was approved by the voters in 2008. This measure is authorized by the State Legislature under Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7285.9. This measure would set the retail transactions and use tax rate at one-half of one percent (0.50%).", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2343, "no_votes": 947, "total_votes": 3290, "percent_yes": 71.21580547112461, "percent_no": 28.78419452887539, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.796947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.911383", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If approved by the voters, Measure I-14, entitled \"The Pismo Beach Vital Public Service Protection Measure\", would amend the Pismo Beach Municipal Code to extend the current retail transactions and use tax within the City that was approved by the voters in 2008. This measure is authorized by the State Legislature under Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7285.9. This measure would set the retail transactions and use tax rate at one-half of one percent (0.50%).", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5374, "fingerprint": "2014|201400263|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400263|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "bfa4d984afa62ec0", "measure_id": "201400263", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 2.09.010 of the Morro Bay Municipal Code is amended, in its entirety, to read as follows: Section 2.09.010: Time of General Municipal Election. Pursuant to the authority granted by the state, the city shall hold its general municipal election on the same day as the statewide general election. That day is the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November in each even-numbered year.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3210, "no_votes": 1000, "total_votes": 4210, "percent_yes": 76.24703087885986, "percent_no": 23.75296912114014, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.795965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.911018", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 2.09.010 of the Morro Bay Municipal Code is amended, in its entirety, to read as follows: Section 2.09.010: Time of General Municipal Election. Pursuant to the authority granted by the state, the city shall hold its general municipal election on the same day as the statewide general election. That day is the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November in each even-numbered year.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5373, "fingerprint": "2014|201400221|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400221|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "1a3127d8cb3c7751", "measure_id": "201400221", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To rehabilitate/resurface deteriorating residential and major streets to improve drivability; maintain emergency response times; enhance safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, drivers, neighborhood school crosswalks; and promote economic/job growth; shall the City incrementally issue up to $48,000,000 of bonds at tax-exempt interest rates, requiring funds go directly into the Street Construction Designated Fund with all funds used exclusively for Grover Beach streets; subject to independent audits/citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2337, "no_votes": 1099, "total_votes": 3436, "percent_yes": 68.0151338766007, "percent_no": 31.9848661233993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.795429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.910832", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To rehabilitate/resurface deteriorating residential and major streets to improve drivability; maintain emergency response times; enhance safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, drivers, neighborhood school crosswalks; and promote economic/job growth; shall the City incrementally issue up to $48,000,000 of bonds at tax-exempt interest rates, requiring funds go directly into the Street Construction Designated Fund with all funds used exclusively for Grover Beach streets; subject to independent audits/citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5380, "fingerprint": "2014|201400525|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400525|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "93e9e8c4079f4792", "measure_id": "201400525", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting on the proposition, the Santa Maria-Bonita School District (the \"District\") shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $45,000,000 in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed under the heading entitled \"BOND PROJECT LIST\" below (the \"Bond Project List\"), and qualify to receive State of California matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified below. By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting on the proposition, the Santa Maria-Bonita School District (the \"District\") shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $45,000,000 in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed under the heading entitled \"BOND PROJECT LIST\" below (the \"Bond Project List\"), and qualify to receive State of California matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified below.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 1, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.815445", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.912298", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting on the proposition, the Santa Maria-Bonita School District (the \"District\") shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $45,000,000 in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed under the heading entitled \"BOND PROJECT LIST\" below (the \"Bond Project List\"), and qualify to receive State of California matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified below. By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting on the proposition, the Santa Maria-Bonita School District (the \"District\") shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $45,000,000 in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed under the heading entitled \"BOND PROJECT LIST\" below (the \"Bond Project List\"), and qualify to receive State of California matching grant funds, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified below.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5388, "fingerprint": "2014|201400415|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400415|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "1155d9abc530a4be", "measure_id": "201400415", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high quality education and upgrade local high schools with funding that cannot be taken by the state by adding classrooms, science labs, and schools to avoid overcrowding; provide updated classroom technology, labs, and career technical facilities; renovate aging classrooms and repair, construct, or acquire equipment, classrooms, and facilities, shall Sequoia Union High School District issue $265 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22995, "no_votes": 12052, "total_votes": 35047, "percent_yes": 65.61189260136389, "percent_no": 34.38810739863611, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.818437", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.913823", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high quality education and upgrade local high schools with funding that cannot be taken by the state by adding classrooms, science labs, and schools to avoid overcrowding; provide updated classroom technology, labs, and career technical facilities; renovate aging classrooms and repair, construct, or acquire equipment, classrooms, and facilities, shall Sequoia Union High School District issue $265 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5387, "fingerprint": "2014|201400380|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400380|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "06a320ff1301d115", "measure_id": "201400380", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing the current tax rate and to continue student achievement in Coastside elementary, middle and high schools by preserving strong science, math, reading and writing programs; retaining qualified teachers and staff; maintaining updated classroom technology; and keeping all district schools open, shall Cabrillo Unified School District renew its expiring $150 education parcel tax for five years with citizen oversight, a senior citizen exemption, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds staying in Coastside schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4637, "no_votes": 1917, "total_votes": 6554, "percent_yes": 70.75068660360085, "percent_no": 29.249313396399145, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.818139", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.913630", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the current tax rate and to continue student achievement in Coastside elementary, middle and high schools by preserving strong science, math, reading and writing programs; retaining qualified teachers and staff; maintaining updated classroom technology; and keeping all district schools open, shall Cabrillo Unified School District renew its expiring $150 education parcel tax for five years with citizen oversight, a senior citizen exemption, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds staying in Coastside schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5386, "fingerprint": "2014|201400375|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400375|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fe8f1dd8ca02ad1e", "measure_id": "201400375", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; repair deteriorating plumbing systems; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Bayshore Elementary School District issue $6 million of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 325, "no_votes": 71, "total_votes": 396, "percent_yes": 82.07070707070707, "percent_no": 17.929292929292927, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.817769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.913437", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; repair deteriorating plumbing systems; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and improve student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Bayshore Elementary School District issue $6 million of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5389, "fingerprint": "2014|201400423|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400423|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d7576a118f7ac83c", "measure_id": "201400423", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair basic Woodside Elementary School infrastructure and protect quality academic instruction in core subjects with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, upgrade educational facilities to meet current health/safety codes, renovate heating, electrical, sewer/security systems, fix leaking roofs, shall Woodside Elementary School District issue $13,500,000 of bonds, at legal rates, to repair, renovate, construct, reconstruct, acquire and equip classrooms and school facilities, with independent audits, citizen's oversight, and no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 713, "no_votes": 395, "total_votes": 1108, "percent_yes": 64.35018050541517, "percent_no": 35.64981949458483, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.818769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.914006", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair basic Woodside Elementary School infrastructure and protect quality academic instruction in core subjects with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, upgrade educational facilities to meet current health/safety codes, renovate heating, electrical, sewer/security systems, fix leaking roofs, shall Woodside Elementary School District issue $13,500,000 of bonds, at legal rates, to repair, renovate, construct, reconstruct, acquire and equip classrooms and school facilities, with independent audits, citizen's oversight, and no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5381, "fingerprint": "2014|201400106|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400106|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a3cb058efa03439c", "measure_id": "201400106", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing the Main Street Bridge Safety and Accessibility Act as the official policy of the people of the City of Half Moon Bay?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1053, "no_votes": 1807, "total_votes": 2860, "percent_yes": 36.81818181818181, "percent_no": 63.18181818181819, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.815946", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.912487", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing the Main Street Bridge Safety and Accessibility Act as the official policy of the people of the City of Half Moon Bay?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5382, "fingerprint": "2014|201400107|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400107|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e8981dea32d962a8", "measure_id": "201400107", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing the Main Street Bridge Preservation Act, amending the Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations of the City to prohibit demolition or enlargement of the Main Street Bridge unless approved by the City Council and a majority of voters in a subsequent ballot measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1977, "no_votes": 1017, "total_votes": 2994, "percent_yes": 66.03206412825652, "percent_no": 33.96793587174348, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.816299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.912669", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing the Main Street Bridge Preservation Act, amending the Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations of the City to prohibit demolition or enlargement of the Main Street Bridge unless approved by the City Council and a majority of voters in a subsequent ballot measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5394, "fingerprint": "2014|201400522|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400522|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "16c9b90d089055d7", "measure_id": "201400522", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare College of San Mateo, Ca\u00f1ada College and Skyline College students for universities and high-demand jobs; modernize math and science classrooms and labs; upgrade computer, biotechnology and job training facilities; upgrade access for disabled students; ensure classrooms meet earthquake, fire and safety requirements; and replace aging infrastructure with energy efficient systems, shall San Mateo County Community College District issue $388,000,000 in bonds within legal limits, with annual independent audits, Citizen\u2019s Oversight and all proceeds benefiting your local community colleges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 102615, "no_votes": 52350, "total_votes": 154965, "percent_yes": 66.21817829832543, "percent_no": 33.78182170167457, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.820266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.914928", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare College of San Mateo, Ca\u00f1ada College and Skyline College students for universities and high-demand jobs; modernize math and science classrooms and labs; upgrade computer, biotechnology and job training facilities; upgrade access for disabled students; ensure classrooms meet earthquake, fire and safety requirements; and replace aging infrastructure with energy efficient systems, shall San Mateo County Community College District issue $388,000,000 in bonds within legal limits, with annual independent audits, Citizen\u2019s Oversight and all proceeds benefiting your local community colleges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5391, "fingerprint": "2014|201400435|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400435|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8119cd9d7189182f", "measure_id": "201400435", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To add elementary and middle school classrooms and science labs for math, science, reading and writing programs, relieve school overcrowding, provide updated classroom computers and instructional technology for quality 21st Century education, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities and equipment, add restrooms to accommodate growing student enrollment, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores School District issue $48 million in bonds which cannot be taken by the State, at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7017, "no_votes": 3820, "total_votes": 10837, "percent_yes": 64.75039217495618, "percent_no": 35.249607825043825, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.819329", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.914369", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To add elementary and middle school classrooms and science labs for math, science, reading and writing programs, relieve school overcrowding, provide updated classroom computers and instructional technology for quality 21st Century education, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities and equipment, add restrooms to accommodate growing student enrollment, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores School District issue $48 million in bonds which cannot be taken by the State, at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5393, "fingerprint": "2014|201400475|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400475|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6b2a6a5c7780de3f", "measure_id": "201400475", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and replace leaky roofs, gutters and drains; upgrade classrooms with up-to-date computers and technology; and repair and construct classrooms, libraries and educational facilities at Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor and Adult-Ed High Schools; shall Jefferson Union High School District be authorized to issue $133,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all funds spent locally and no funds taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17090, "no_votes": 6928, "total_votes": 24018, "percent_yes": 71.15496710800232, "percent_no": 28.845032891997676, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.819936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.914746", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and replace leaky roofs, gutters and drains; upgrade classrooms with up-to-date computers and technology; and repair and construct classrooms, libraries and educational facilities at Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor and Adult-Ed High Schools; shall Jefferson Union High School District be authorized to issue $133,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all funds spent locally and no funds taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5390, "fingerprint": "2014|201400434|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400434|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7e249d446e765e4e", "measure_id": "201400434", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve quality education and maintain stable local funding that cannot be taken by the State; maintain competitive science, math, reading, writing and other programs; attract and retain quality teachers; and integrate modern technology for future student success; shall Bayshore Elementary School District renew the existing parcel tax at the rate per parcel described in the voter pamphlet for 8 years with annual adjustments for inflation, senior and disability exemptions, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 451, "no_votes": 163, "total_votes": 614, "percent_yes": 73.45276872964169, "percent_no": 26.54723127035831, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.819049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.914187", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve quality education and maintain stable local funding that cannot be taken by the State; maintain competitive science, math, reading, writing and other programs; attract and retain quality teachers; and integrate modern technology for future student success; shall Bayshore Elementary School District renew the existing parcel tax at the rate per parcel described in the voter pamphlet for 8 years with annual adjustments for inflation, senior and disability exemptions, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5392, "fingerprint": "2014|201400439|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400439|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "62130893f320e89b", "measure_id": "201400439", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing current tax rates and to maintain quality education for Burlingame students, by protecting math, science, technology, reading and writing programs, retaining qualified teachers, maintaining hands-on science classes, supporting art and music, maintaining school libraries, and maintaining smaller elementary class sizes, shall Burlingame Elementary School District consolidate and renew its existing $256 parcel taxes for 14 years, including a senior citizen exemption, no funds for administrators' salaries, independent citizen oversight, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6379, "no_votes": 1885, "total_votes": 8264, "percent_yes": 77.19022265246855, "percent_no": 22.80977734753145, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.819627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.914564", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing current tax rates and to maintain quality education for Burlingame students, by protecting math, science, technology, reading and writing programs, retaining qualified teachers, maintaining hands-on science classes, supporting art and music, maintaining school libraries, and maintaining smaller elementary class sizes, shall Burlingame Elementary School District consolidate and renew its existing $256 parcel taxes for 14 years, including a senior citizen exemption, no funds for administrators' salaries, independent citizen oversight, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5384, "fingerprint": "2014|201400254|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400254|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d58aeb4017d401ec", "measure_id": "201400254", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an Ordinance entitled \u201cAn Initiative Measure Proposing Amendments to the City of Menlo Park General Plan and Menlo Park 2012 El Camino Real/Downtown Specific Plan Limiting Office Development, Modifying Open Space Requirements, and Requiring Voter Approval for New Non-Residential Projects that Exceed Specified Development Limits\u201d be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3893, "no_votes": 6179, "total_votes": 10072, "percent_yes": 38.6517077045274, "percent_no": 61.3482922954726, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.817139", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.913054", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an Ordinance entitled \u201cAn Initiative Measure Proposing Amendments to the City of Menlo Park General Plan and Menlo Park 2012 El Camino Real/Downtown Specific Plan Limiting Office Development, Modifying Open Space Requirements, and Requiring Voter Approval for New Non-Residential Projects that Exceed Specified Development Limits\u201d be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5385, "fingerprint": "2014|201400321|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400321|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "1f79235fa5fff7ca", "measure_id": "201400321", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To stimulate economic enhancement only in San Bruno\u2019s Transit Corridors Plan Area, shall the City amend Ordinance 1284 to allow: (1) buildings exceeding the maximum height of fifty feet by: twenty feet along El Camino Real, fifteen feet along San Bruno Avenue, five feet along San Mateo Avenue, and forty feet in the Caltrain Station area; (2) development on 42 residential parcels exceeding the density permitted in 1974; (3) above-ground multi-story parking garages.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5382, "no_votes": 2511, "total_votes": 7893, "percent_yes": 68.18700114025086, "percent_no": 31.812998859749143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.817475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.913245", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To stimulate economic enhancement only in San Bruno\u2019s Transit Corridors Plan Area, shall the City amend Ordinance 1284 to allow: (1) buildings exceeding the maximum height of fifty feet by: twenty feet along El Camino Real, fifteen feet along San Bruno Avenue, five feet along San Mateo Avenue, and forty feet in the Caltrain Station area; (2) development on 42 residential parcels exceeding the density permitted in 1974; (3) above-ground multi-story parking garages.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5383, "fingerprint": "2014|201400225|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400225|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ba7a4e3272ec7ae7", "measure_id": "201400225", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide additional funding exclusively for the City of Half Moon Bay that can be used to substantially fund our new Library, upgrade Smith Field and other recreational facilities, repair city streets, improve youth and senior services, and invest in opportunities to enhance our quality of life, shall the expiration date of half-cent general sales tax approved by Half Moon Bay voters in 2012 be extended for 3 years, to April, 2019, with continued oversight by a citizens\u2019 committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1886, "no_votes": 1908, "total_votes": 3794, "percent_yes": 49.71006852925672, "percent_no": 50.28993147074328, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.816662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.912858", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide additional funding exclusively for the City of Half Moon Bay that can be used to substantially fund our new Library, upgrade Smith Field and other recreational facilities, repair city streets, improve youth and senior services, and invest in opportunities to enhance our quality of life, shall the expiration date of half-cent general sales tax approved by Half Moon Bay voters in 2012 be extended for 3 years, to April, 2019, with continued oversight by a citizens\u2019 committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5395, "fingerprint": "2014|201400021|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400021|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "349cd5806b34ea76", "measure_id": "201400021", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the County Facilities Maintenance Ordinance requiring the County to keep County owned roads, parks and buildings in their current condition or better be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33899, "no_votes": 36589, "total_votes": 70488, "percent_yes": 48.091873794120986, "percent_no": 51.908126205879014, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.820577", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.915124", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the County Facilities Maintenance Ordinance requiring the County to keep County owned roads, parks and buildings in their current condition or better be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5396, "fingerprint": "2014|201400063|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400063|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "b29aee1719845984", "measure_id": "201400063", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance to amend Section 32-12 of the Santa Barbara County Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from 10% to 12.5% upon transients occupying defined hotels located only within the unincorporated areas of the County be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43947, "no_votes": 61110, "total_votes": 105057, "percent_yes": 41.8315771438362, "percent_no": 58.1684228561638, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.821040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.915309", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to amend Section 32-12 of the Santa Barbara County Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from 10% to 12.5% upon transients occupying defined hotels located only within the unincorporated areas of the County be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5397, "fingerprint": "2014|201400064|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400064|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "7c7fc31812a52109", "measure_id": "201400064", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending Santa Barbara County's Comprehensive Plan and County Code -- to prohibit on all lands within the unincorporated County, with certain exemptions, the construction or use of any facility, appurtenance, or aboveground equipment supporting certain petroleum operations, including but not limited to: hydraulic fracturing; acid well stimulation; or aiding hydrocarbon flow into a well by injecting water, natural gas, steam, air, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, chemicals or other substances -- be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42965, "no_votes": 67838, "total_votes": 110803, "percent_yes": 38.77602591987582, "percent_no": 61.22397408012418, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.821331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.915618", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending Santa Barbara County's Comprehensive Plan and County Code -- to prohibit on all lands within the unincorporated County, with certain exemptions, the construction or use of any facility, appurtenance, or aboveground equipment supporting certain petroleum operations, including but not limited to: hydraulic fracturing; acid well stimulation; or aiding hydrocarbon flow into a well by injecting water, natural gas, steam, air, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, chemicals or other substances -- be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5404, "fingerprint": "2014|201400493|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400493|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "dcf52c8e1dbf202b", "measure_id": "201400493", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair essential/outdated Montecito Union School infrastructure/maintain the quality of education with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, upgrade educational facilities to meet current health/safety/security/accessibility codes, reduce traffic and improve safety on San Ysidro Road, renovate heating, plumbing, electrical/energy systems, shall Montecito Union Elementary School District issue $27,150,000 of bonds, at legal rates, to repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities and equipment, with independent audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1574, "no_votes": 1257, "total_votes": 2831, "percent_yes": 55.598728364535496, "percent_no": 44.401271635464504, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.824002", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.917508", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair essential/outdated Montecito Union School infrastructure/maintain the quality of education with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, upgrade educational facilities to meet current health/safety/security/accessibility codes, reduce traffic and improve safety on San Ysidro Road, renovate heating, plumbing, electrical/energy systems, shall Montecito Union Elementary School District issue $27,150,000 of bonds, at legal rates, to repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities and equipment, with independent audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5398, "fingerprint": "2014|201400176|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400176|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "dea545e0146af516", "measure_id": "201400176", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of Buellton elect a Mayor and four City Council Members? (yes/no)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1158, "no_votes": 449, "total_votes": 1607, "percent_yes": 72.05973864343497, "percent_no": 27.94026135656503, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.821603", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.915960", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of Buellton elect a Mayor and four City Council Members? (yes/no)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11347, "fingerprint": "2014|201400177|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400177|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "a784d97a932c7b09", "measure_id": "201400177", "measure_letter": "R2", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of the Mayor of Buellton be two years? (yes/no)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1131, "no_votes": 432, "total_votes": 1563, "percent_yes": 72.36084452975048, "percent_no": 27.63915547024952, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.932039", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.821912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.916152", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of the Mayor of Buellton be two years? (yes/no)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11348, "fingerprint": "2014|201400178|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400178|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "8dbbab6ac55fecc4", "measure_id": "201400178", "measure_letter": "R3", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of the Mayor of Buellton be four years? (yes/no)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 312, "no_votes": 1225, "total_votes": 1537, "percent_yes": 20.2992843201041, "percent_no": 79.7007156798959, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.932231", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.822265", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.916345", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of the Mayor of Buellton be four years? (yes/no)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5405, "fingerprint": "2014|201400523|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400523|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "3d26d9645226e408", "measure_id": "201400523", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, construct, acquire and seismically upgrade facilities, sites and equipment at City College, maintain access to quality, affordable education for students, including local high school graduates and returning veterans, prepare students for careers and transfer to four-year universities by upgrading academic, science, engineering, healthcare and vocational classrooms and improving technology and energy efficiency, shall Santa Barbara Community College District issue $288 million in bonds, at legal rates, requiring citizens' oversight, audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30493, "no_votes": 30214, "total_votes": 60707, "percent_yes": 50.22979228095606, "percent_no": 49.77020771904394, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.824274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.917708", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, construct, acquire and seismically upgrade facilities, sites and equipment at City College, maintain access to quality, affordable education for students, including local high school graduates and returning veterans, prepare students for careers and transfer to four-year universities by upgrading academic, science, engineering, healthcare and vocational classrooms and improving technology and energy efficiency, shall Santa Barbara Community College District issue $288 million in bonds, at legal rates, requiring citizens' oversight, audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5402, "fingerprint": "2014|201400441|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400441|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "e7c0fc495c2a89cb", "measure_id": "201400441", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve schools, attract and retain quality teachers, and prepare students for college and careers by repairing deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms/leaky roofs, removing asbestos and lead paint, upgrading electrical wiring and classroom technology, repairing, constructing, acquiring educational facilities, sites/equipment, shall Carpinteria Unified School District issue $90,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring annual independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries or pensions, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3901, "no_votes": 1980, "total_votes": 5881, "percent_yes": 66.33225641897637, "percent_no": 33.66774358102363, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.823425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.917116", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve schools, attract and retain quality teachers, and prepare students for college and careers by repairing deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms/leaky roofs, removing asbestos and lead paint, upgrading electrical wiring and classroom technology, repairing, constructing, acquiring educational facilities, sites/equipment, shall Carpinteria Unified School District issue $90,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring annual independent audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries or pensions, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5399, "fingerprint": "2014|201400222|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400222|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "dc600538382d4332", "measure_id": "201400222", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve, enhance, and improve vital public services in Guadalupe, including police and fire protection, parks and recreation, and public infrastructure shall an ordinance be adopted to remove the maximum annual utility tax liability for a single utility user?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 799, "no_votes": 111, "total_votes": 910, "percent_yes": 87.8021978021978, "percent_no": 12.197802197802204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.822538", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.916539", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve, enhance, and improve vital public services in Guadalupe, including police and fire protection, parks and recreation, and public infrastructure shall an ordinance be adopted to remove the maximum annual utility tax liability for a single utility user?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5400, "fingerprint": "2014|201400223|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400223|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "211311b8f8dee06c", "measure_id": "201400223", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve, enhance, and improve vital public services in Guadalupe, including police and fire protection, parks and recreation, and public infrastructure, shall an ordinance be adopted to establish within the City of Guadalupe a business tax certificate based on a business's gross receipts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 797, "no_votes": 181, "total_votes": 978, "percent_yes": 81.49284253578732, "percent_no": 18.507157464212682, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.822836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.916731", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve, enhance, and improve vital public services in Guadalupe, including police and fire protection, parks and recreation, and public infrastructure, shall an ordinance be adopted to establish within the City of Guadalupe a business tax certificate based on a business's gross receipts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5401, "fingerprint": "2014|201400224|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400224|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "010cb5c774e4dece", "measure_id": "201400224", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve, enhance and improve the public services, safety and character of Guadalupe, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the City of Guadalupe sales tax by one-quarter cent for a period of eight and one half years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 760, "no_votes": 224, "total_votes": 984, "percent_yes": 77.23577235772358, "percent_no": 22.764227642276424, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.823108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.916922", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve, enhance and improve the public services, safety and character of Guadalupe, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the City of Guadalupe sales tax by one-quarter cent for a period of eight and one half years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5403, "fingerprint": "2014|201400444|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400444|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "0145ae6a840e102f", "measure_id": "201400444", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better integrate school facilities with an academic program that supports science, technology, engineering and math (STEAM) initiatives by constructing new classrooms and making necessary improvements to existing classrooms and laboratories and support facilities for visual and performing arts, provide improved access to 21st century technology to support educational programs, shall the College School District be authorized to issue up to $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1244, "no_votes": 1246, "total_votes": 2490, "percent_yes": 49.95983935742972, "percent_no": 50.04016064257028, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.823729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.917313", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better integrate school facilities with an academic program that supports science, technology, engineering and math (STEAM) initiatives by constructing new classrooms and making necessary improvements to existing classrooms and laboratories and support facilities for visual and performing arts, provide improved access to 21st century technology to support educational programs, shall the College School District be authorized to issue up to $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11351, "fingerprint": "2014|201400370|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400370|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6e6fc7986fc982f1", "measure_id": "201400370", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing the current tax rates, to protect outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math and science, retain highly qualified teachers, provide updated classroom technology for a 21st Century education, keep libraries up-to-date, and retain music and art programs, shall Cupertino Union School District consolidate/renew its existing $250 education parcel tax, without increase, for eight years with citizen oversight, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, exempt senior citizens, and all funds staying in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17216, "no_votes": 4648, "total_votes": 21864, "percent_yes": 78.74130991584339, "percent_no": 21.258690084156612, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-05-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.935852", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.848528", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.920043", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the current tax rates, to protect outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math and science, retain highly qualified teachers, provide updated classroom technology for a 21st Century education, keep libraries up-to-date, and retain music and art programs, shall Cupertino Union School District consolidate/renew its existing $250 education parcel tax, without increase, for eight years with citizen oversight, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, exempt senior citizens, and all funds staying in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11349, "fingerprint": "2014|201400264|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400264|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "7fc61a9d4eaf0bad", "measure_id": "201400264", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Mountain View amend Section 503 of the City Charter to set the base salary of City Council at $1,000 per month, with an automatic annual adjustment, to become effective on January 1, 2015?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9657, "no_votes": 6136, "total_votes": 15793, "percent_yes": 61.14734375989362, "percent_no": 38.85265624010638, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.934925", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.846100", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.919074", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Mountain View amend Section 503 of the City Charter to set the base salary of City Council at $1,000 per month, with an automatic annual adjustment, to become effective on January 1, 2015?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5407, "fingerprint": "2014|201400109|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400109|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cb52891dae6a4707", "measure_id": "201400109", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town's General Plan, General Plan Land Use Map, and Zoning Code and Map be amended and shall the Albright Specific Plan be adopted to provide land use rules for approximately 21.6 acres of land at 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4652, "no_votes": 1745, "total_votes": 6397, "percent_yes": 72.72158824448961, "percent_no": 27.27841175551039, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.844651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.918286", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town's General Plan, General Plan Land Use Map, and Zoning Code and Map be amended and shall the Albright Specific Plan be adopted to provide land use rules for approximately 21.6 acres of land at 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11350, "fingerprint": "2014|201400286|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400286|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cd6eea07ff9a37b7", "measure_id": "201400286", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding that cannot be taken away by the State for general fund infrastructure and City services such as earthquake safe fire stations; pedestrian and bike improvements including safe routes to school, streets, sidewalks, paths, and bridges; and maintaining parks and recreation facilities, shall the City increase the hotel/motel tax by two percent and update language to confirm equal treatment of traditional and online bookings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15475, "no_votes": 4812, "total_votes": 20287, "percent_yes": 76.28037659584956, "percent_no": 23.71962340415044, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.935109", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.846600", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.919265", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding that cannot be taken away by the State for general fund infrastructure and City services such as earthquake safe fire stations; pedestrian and bike improvements including safe routes to school, streets, sidewalks, paths, and bridges; and maintaining parks and recreation facilities, shall the City increase the hotel/motel tax by two percent and update language to confirm equal treatment of traditional and online bookings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5408, "fingerprint": "2014|201400133|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400133|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6d333e3ec24fcd99", "measure_id": "201400133", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue existing, voter-approved funding for all San Jos\u00e9's libraries and services, including: open hours; librarians; updated books/research materials; access to computers/technology; children's reading programs, story times, teen/senior programs; and adult literacy/job readiness, shall the City of San Jos\u00e9 continue its library parcel tax for 25 years, subject to independent annual audits and citizens oversight, with no change in the existing voter-approved tax rate formula?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 102291, "no_votes": 23264, "total_votes": 125555, "percent_yes": 81.47106845605512, "percent_no": 18.52893154394488, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.844977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.918478", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue existing, voter-approved funding for all San Jos\u00e9's libraries and services, including: open hours; librarians; updated books/research materials; access to computers/technology; children's reading programs, story times, teen/senior programs; and adult literacy/job readiness, shall the City of San Jos\u00e9 continue its library parcel tax for 25 years, subject to independent annual audits and citizens oversight, with no change in the existing voter-approved tax rate formula?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11352, "fingerprint": "2014|201400399|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400399|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0841426adc83aa3b", "measure_id": "201400399", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing the current tax rate and to continue high quality education for local elementary, middle and high school students by maintaining strong academic programs in science, math, engineering, reading and writing, preparing students for college and 21st Century careers, and retaining highly qualified teachers, shall Milpitas Unified School District renew its expiring $84 education parcel tax for 8 years with citizen oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, senior citizen exemptions and all funds staying in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5775, "no_votes": 2026, "total_votes": 7801, "percent_yes": 74.02897064478913, "percent_no": 25.971029355210874, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.936594", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.867585", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.920837", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the current tax rate and to continue high quality education for local elementary, middle and high school students by maintaining strong academic programs in science, math, engineering, reading and writing, preparing students for college and 21st Century careers, and retaining highly qualified teachers, shall Milpitas Unified School District renew its expiring $84 education parcel tax for 8 years with citizen oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, senior citizen exemptions and all funds staying in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5411, "fingerprint": "2014|201400287|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400287|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "47d498422ff73ba0", "measure_id": "201400287", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure continued funding for basic and essential services such as police, fire and street maintenance and repair, shall the City of Palo Alto maintain the telecommunications portion of the Utility Users Tax while reducing the rate from 5% to 4.75%; modernize its provisions to ensure equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of telecommunications technology used; and eliminate a discounted tax rate paid by a small number of commercial large users of gas, electric and water services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16988, "no_votes": 2978, "total_votes": 19966, "percent_yes": 85.08464389462085, "percent_no": 14.915356105379146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.847067", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.919460", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure continued funding for basic and essential services such as police, fire and street maintenance and repair, shall the City of Palo Alto maintain the telecommunications portion of the Utility Users Tax while reducing the rate from 5% to 4.75%; modernize its provisions to ensure equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of telecommunications technology used; and eliminate a discounted tax rate paid by a small number of commercial large users of gas, electric and water services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5412, "fingerprint": "2014|201400288|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400288|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "837308ac8bf261f9", "measure_id": "201400288", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Palo Alto City Charter be amended to change the number of Council Member seats from nine to seven, commencing on January 1, 2019?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10495, "no_votes": 9048, "total_votes": 19543, "percent_yes": 53.70209282095891, "percent_no": 46.29790717904109, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.847587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.919652", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Palo Alto City Charter be amended to change the number of Council Member seats from nine to seven, commencing on January 1, 2019?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5410, "fingerprint": "2014|201400256|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400256|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "7126f000b3cbdabb", "measure_id": "201400256", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall one licensed gambling establishment in which any controlled games permitted by law, such as draw poker, low-ball poker, panguine (pan), seven-card stud, or other lawful card games or tile games, are played, be allowed in the City of Milpitas and shall that cardroom establishment pay a tax of 10.5% on gaming revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3172, "no_votes": 9983, "total_votes": 13155, "percent_yes": 24.11250475104523, "percent_no": 75.88749524895476, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.845549", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.918882", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall one licensed gambling establishment in which any controlled games permitted by law, such as draw poker, low-ball poker, panguine (pan), seven-card stud, or other lawful card games or tile games, are played, be allowed in the City of Milpitas and shall that cardroom establishment pay a tax of 10.5% on gaming revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5409, "fingerprint": "2014|201400219|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400219|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c26e21c81522fd97", "measure_id": "201400219", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve local quality of life and maintain essential City services, including police/fire protection; gang suppression/prevention; 9-1-1 emergency response; street/pothole/sidewalk repairs; earthquake safety; at-risk youth programs; park repairs; and other general services; shall the City of Gilroy enact a half cent sales tax for 15 years with authority to incur debt to accelerate infrastructure projects, requiring independent audits, public review and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4117, "no_votes": 4965, "total_votes": 9082, "percent_yes": 45.33142479630037, "percent_no": 54.66857520369963, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.845258", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.918687", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local quality of life and maintain essential City services, including police/fire protection; gang suppression/prevention; 9-1-1 emergency response; street/pothole/sidewalk repairs; earthquake safety; at-risk youth programs; park repairs; and other general services; shall the City of Gilroy enact a half cent sales tax for 15 years with authority to incur debt to accelerate infrastructure projects, requiring independent audits, public review and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5413, "fingerprint": "2014|201400325|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400325|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "18f3fd97fb31cdc1", "measure_id": "201400325", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to 1) allow the Council to establish one or more Retirement Boards with specified authority, including, hiring an at-will chief executive, (2) specify the hiring authority of the Retirement Services chief executive; 3) exclude certain future Retirement Services employees from the classified civil service and the City\u2019s defined benefit retirement plans; and (4) establish the process for setting stipends paid to non-employee Retirement Board members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86122, "no_votes": 82270, "total_votes": 168392, "percent_yes": 51.14375979856525, "percent_no": 48.85624020143475, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.848065", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.919843", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to 1) allow the Council to establish one or more Retirement Boards with specified authority, including, hiring an at-will chief executive, (2) specify the hiring authority of the Retirement Services chief executive; 3) exclude certain future Retirement Services employees from the classified civil service and the City\u2019s defined benefit retirement plans; and (4) establish the process for setting stipends paid to non-employee Retirement Board members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11356, "fingerprint": "2014|201400524|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400524|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e19eeb125957980c", "measure_id": "201400524", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair or replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing and wiring, remove asbestos, lead and hazardous materials; to upgrade outdated classrooms and career training facilities to support 21st century learning and prepare students for college and careers; to acquire, renovate, construct/equip classrooms and facilities to relieve overcrowding and attract quality teachers, shall the Santa Clara Unified School District issue $419 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18958, "no_votes": 8362, "total_votes": 27320, "percent_yes": 69.39238653001463, "percent_no": 30.607613469985367, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.938822", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.890781", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.923210", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair or replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing and wiring, remove asbestos, lead and hazardous materials; to upgrade outdated classrooms and career training facilities to support 21st century learning and prepare students for college and careers; to acquire, renovate, construct/equip classrooms and facilities to relieve overcrowding and attract quality teachers, shall the Santa Clara Unified School District issue $419 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5415, "fingerprint": "2014|201400386|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400386|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "257e81ff62c7bbfe", "measure_id": "201400386", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide competitive and safe learning environments and enhance student achievement by Improving hands-on science, technology and math instruction; Keeping class size low; Improving teacher quality and training; Protecting arts/music programs and libraries; Ensuring adequate student supervision and safety; Shall the Evergreen Elementary School District renew a parcel tax at $100 per parcel for 5 years with citizen oversight, annual reports, a senior exemption, and no money for District administrators' salaries or the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11445, "no_votes": 3835, "total_votes": 15280, "percent_yes": 74.90183246073299, "percent_no": 25.09816753926701, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.849535", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.920442", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide competitive and safe learning environments and enhance student achievement by Improving hands-on science, technology and math instruction; Keeping class size low; Improving teacher quality and training; Protecting arts/music programs and libraries; Ensuring adequate student supervision and safety; Shall the Evergreen Elementary School District renew a parcel tax at $100 per parcel for 5 years with citizen oversight, annual reports, a senior exemption, and no money for District administrators' salaries or the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11353, "fingerprint": "2014|201400454|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400454|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a4bed5adf1a8537f", "measure_id": "201400454", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student computer access; upgrade educational software; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; and implement statewide testing requirements at Andrew Hill, Calero, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Yerba Buena, W.C. Overfelt, Adult-Ed, alternative and District charter schools; shall East Side Union High School District issue $113,200,000 of bonds with rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and no funds for administrators or use by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59092, "no_votes": 27922, "total_votes": 87014, "percent_yes": 67.9109108879031, "percent_no": 32.0890891120969, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.937712", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.888946", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.922049", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student computer access; upgrade educational software; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; and implement statewide testing requirements at Andrew Hill, Calero, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Yerba Buena, W.C. Overfelt, Adult-Ed, alternative and District charter schools; shall East Side Union High School District issue $113,200,000 of bonds with rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, and no funds for administrators or use by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5414, "fingerprint": "2014|201400379|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400379|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9ec03f003283e854", "measure_id": "201400379", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce classroom overcrowding by providing additional classrooms, support high quality education, enhance school safety and security, update fire and earthquake safety systems, provide access to 21st century learning technology, maximize energy efficiency, repair or replace leaky windows, replace outdated heating/cooling equipment, and build/equip classrooms, facilities, and sites, shall Cambrian School District issue $39 million in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators' salaries and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3840, "no_votes": 1459, "total_votes": 5299, "percent_yes": 72.46650311379506, "percent_no": 27.533496886204944, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.848995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.920247", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce classroom overcrowding by providing additional classrooms, support high quality education, enhance school safety and security, update fire and earthquake safety systems, provide access to 21st century learning technology, maximize energy efficiency, repair or replace leaky windows, replace outdated heating/cooling equipment, and build/equip classrooms, facilities, and sites, shall Cambrian School District issue $39 million in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators' salaries and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11354, "fingerprint": "2014|201400463|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400463|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a1da14a779313717", "measure_id": "201400463", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renew its existing parcel tax without increasing the cost or changing the structure of the proposal voters first approved in 2004, shall the Fremont Union High School District continue to levy a $98 parcel tax for 6 more years beginning July 1, 2016 to protect the math, science, English, foreign language, music and art classes currently offered, maintain class sizes, retain high quality teachers and staff and offer an exemption to individuals age 65 and over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35415, "no_votes": 14210, "total_votes": 49625, "percent_yes": 71.36523929471032, "percent_no": 28.63476070528968, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.938079", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.889546", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.922437", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew its existing parcel tax without increasing the cost or changing the structure of the proposal voters first approved in 2004, shall the Fremont Union High School District continue to levy a $98 parcel tax for 6 more years beginning July 1, 2016 to protect the math, science, English, foreign language, music and art classes currently offered, maintain class sizes, retain high quality teachers and staff and offer an exemption to individuals age 65 and over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5417, "fingerprint": "2014|201400419|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400419|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c954b12740c50996", "measure_id": "201400419", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local elementary/middle schools by fixing/replacing leaky roofs, improving safety/fire/security systems, adding classrooms to avoid overcrowding, keeping schools clean/well-maintained, providing updated classroom technology and teacher training for new technology, updating, renovating, acquiring, constructing/equipping classrooms, science/project labs, sites or facilities, shall Union Elementary School District issue $125 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators' salaries, all funds staying in local Union schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5958, "no_votes": 2698, "total_votes": 8656, "percent_yes": 68.83086876155268, "percent_no": 31.16913123844732, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.887920", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.921426", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local elementary/middle schools by fixing/replacing leaky roofs, improving safety/fire/security systems, adding classrooms to avoid overcrowding, keeping schools clean/well-maintained, providing updated classroom technology and teacher training for new technology, updating, renovating, acquiring, constructing/equipping classrooms, science/project labs, sites or facilities, shall Union Elementary School District issue $125 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators' salaries, all funds staying in local Union schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11355, "fingerprint": "2014|201400464|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400464|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f8b583e455183aa7", "measure_id": "201400464", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To avoid overcrowding at Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook and Monta Vista High Schools by building the new classrooms and facilities needed to serve a growing student population, updating computer network capability and science labs, upgrading classroom computers and technology, and replacing, acquiring, constructing and renovating school facilities shall the Fremont Union High School District issue $295 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with annual audits and all expenditures monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31982, "no_votes": 17344, "total_votes": 49326, "percent_yes": 64.8380164619065, "percent_no": 35.161983538093494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.938265", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.889826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.922627", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid overcrowding at Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook and Monta Vista High Schools by building the new classrooms and facilities needed to serve a growing student population, updating computer network capability and science labs, upgrading classroom computers and technology, and replacing, acquiring, constructing and renovating school facilities shall the Fremont Union High School District issue $295 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with annual audits and all expenditures monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5416, "fingerprint": "2014|201400401|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400401|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cdc4860797bf074d", "measure_id": "201400401", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing current tax rates, to continue improving local elementary schools by protecting reading, writing, math/science programs, maintaining libraries, music/art, retaining qualified teachers, preserving tutoring programs for students with special needs, providing updated educational materials and access to 21st Century technology and computer training, and, shall Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District renew its expiring $95 parcel tax for seven years, exempt senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, independent citizen oversight and all funds benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1896, "no_votes": 555, "total_votes": 2451, "percent_yes": 77.3561811505508, "percent_no": 22.643818849449204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.867999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.921033", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing current tax rates, to continue improving local elementary schools by protecting reading, writing, math/science programs, maintaining libraries, music/art, retaining qualified teachers, preserving tutoring programs for students with special needs, providing updated educational materials and access to 21st Century technology and computer training, and, shall Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District renew its expiring $95 parcel tax for seven years, exempt senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, independent citizen oversight and all funds benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5419, "fingerprint": "2014|201400436|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400436|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "341246ea272cd3ed", "measure_id": "201400436", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve schools and continue providing quality education for local students by upgrading school safety, including earthquake, fire and emergency systems, keeping schools clean and wellmaintained, updating classroom learning technology, maximizing energy efficiency to save money, and renovating, acquiring, constructing, and equipping classrooms, sites and facilities, shall Berryessa Union School District issue $77 million in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds staying in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10622, "no_votes": 4698, "total_votes": 15320, "percent_yes": 69.33420365535248, "percent_no": 30.665796344647518, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.888605", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.921849", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve schools and continue providing quality education for local students by upgrading school safety, including earthquake, fire and emergency systems, keeping schools clean and wellmaintained, updating classroom learning technology, maximizing energy efficiency to save money, and renovating, acquiring, constructing, and equipping classrooms, sites and facilities, shall Berryessa Union School District issue $77 million in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds staying in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5420, "fingerprint": "2014|201400459|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400459|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "69db3b9ef89dd865", "measure_id": "201400459", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide a safe, modern learning environment that supports academic achievement by upgrading and constructing classrooms and hands-on science and technology labs that meet modern academic and safety standards, repairing electrical systems, aging roofs, plumbing and restrooms, increasing campus security and improving overall energy efficiency, shall the Evergreen School District issue $100 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen\u2019s oversight, independent audits, and no money district administrator salaries or Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14002, "no_votes": 6738, "total_votes": 20740, "percent_yes": 67.51205400192865, "percent_no": 32.48794599807135, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.889268", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.922239", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a safe, modern learning environment that supports academic achievement by upgrading and constructing classrooms and hands-on science and technology labs that meet modern academic and safety standards, repairing electrical systems, aging roofs, plumbing and restrooms, increasing campus security and improving overall energy efficiency, shall the Evergreen School District issue $100 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen\u2019s oversight, independent audits, and no money district administrator salaries or Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5421, "fingerprint": "2014|201400484|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400484|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f12295563ed1e67a", "measure_id": "201400484", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To accommodate growing student enrollment and avoid public elementary and junior high school overcrowding by expanding and upgrading schools, preserving quality small neighborhood schools, upgrading classrooms and labs to keep them safe, clean and in good repair, updating learning technology, maximizing energy efficiency and acquiring, constructing or equipping classrooms, facilities and sites, shall the Los Altos School District issue $150 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8671, "no_votes": 6435, "total_votes": 15106, "percent_yes": 57.40103270223752, "percent_no": 42.59896729776248, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.890206", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.922824", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To accommodate growing student enrollment and avoid public elementary and junior high school overcrowding by expanding and upgrading schools, preserving quality small neighborhood schools, upgrading classrooms and labs to keep them safe, clean and in good repair, updating learning technology, maximizing energy efficiency and acquiring, constructing or equipping classrooms, facilities and sites, shall the Los Altos School District issue $150 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5418, "fingerprint": "2014|201400428|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400428|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "469e3fe6147de0cb", "measure_id": "201400428", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing current tax rates, and to protect schools from budget cuts, to continue improving local elementary schools by protecting reading, writing, math, science, technology and arts programs, keeping libraries open, retaining qualified teachers and counselors, extending student support, shall Alum Rock Union Elementary School District renew its expiring $176.42, as adjusted, parcel tax for seven years, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, independent citizen oversight, all funds benefitting local schools and no funds available to be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10118, "no_votes": 3376, "total_votes": 13494, "percent_yes": 74.9814732473692, "percent_no": 25.018526752630805, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.888294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.921650", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing current tax rates, and to protect schools from budget cuts, to continue improving local elementary schools by protecting reading, writing, math, science, technology and arts programs, keeping libraries open, retaining qualified teachers and counselors, extending student support, shall Alum Rock Union Elementary School District renew its expiring $176.42, as adjusted, parcel tax for seven years, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, independent citizen oversight, all funds benefitting local schools and no funds available to be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5422, "fingerprint": "2014|201400503|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400503|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4160a22cdc952627", "measure_id": "201400503", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, repair, acquire, construct and modernize classrooms and educational facilities; and to increase student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Oak Grove School District be authorized to issue $89,800,000 of bonds with interest rates below the legal limit, annual audits, independent citizens oversight, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrator salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13056, "no_votes": 6862, "total_votes": 19918, "percent_yes": 65.5487498744854, "percent_no": 34.451250125514605, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.890479", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.923018", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, repair, acquire, construct and modernize classrooms and educational facilities; and to increase student access to computers and modern technology; shall the Oak Grove School District be authorized to issue $89,800,000 of bonds with interest rates below the legal limit, annual audits, independent citizens oversight, all funds spent locally and no money used for administrator salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5406, "fingerprint": "2014|201400065|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400065|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ce625ffe6011c978", "measure_id": "201400065", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect and preserve natural open space areas for future generations by: improving parks, open spaces and trails; protecting land around creeks, rivers and streams to prevent pollution and improve local water quality; preserving wildlife habitat; expanding public access; enhancing environmental education; and protecting scenic hillsides, shall Santa Clara County Open Space Authority levy a special tax of $24 annually per parcel for 15 years, with citizen oversight and all funds benefitting local open space?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 170359, "no_votes": 80363, "total_votes": 250722, "percent_yes": 67.9473680012125, "percent_no": 32.052631998787504, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.844159", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.918092", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect and preserve natural open space areas for future generations by: improving parks, open spaces and trails; protecting land around creeks, rivers and streams to prevent pollution and improve local water quality; preserving wildlife habitat; expanding public access; enhancing environmental education; and protecting scenic hillsides, shall Santa Clara County Open Space Authority levy a special tax of $24 annually per parcel for 15 years, with citizen oversight and all funds benefitting local open space?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5432, "fingerprint": "2014|201400414|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400414|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "2acc4a3a3a99fd2d", "measure_id": "201400414", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace the 70-year old MiddleSchool with a new school,with up-to-date computer/learning technology, science labs,code-compliant/energy-efficient electrical, plumbing, heating/cooling systems; upgrade, construct, acquire classrooms, schools, facilities, sites/equipment that meet accessibility requirements; make needed seismic repairs at elementary schools, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Scotts Valley Unified School District issue $35,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight, no funds for administrators, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3978, "no_votes": 1534, "total_votes": 5512, "percent_yes": 72.16981132075472, "percent_no": 27.830188679245282, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.894073", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.925145", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace the 70-year old MiddleSchool with a new school,with up-to-date computer/learning technology, science labs,code-compliant/energy-efficient electrical, plumbing, heating/cooling systems; upgrade, construct, acquire classrooms, schools, facilities, sites/equipment that meet accessibility requirements; make needed seismic repairs at elementary schools, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Scotts Valley Unified School District issue $35,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight, no funds for administrators, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5431, "fingerprint": "2014|201400396|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400396|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "e47c9d80ac231ecd", "measure_id": "201400396", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade local schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School District make essential safety repairs, fix or replace leaky and aging roofs, keep schools clean and well-maintained, update science labs, classrooms and technology, prevent classroom overcrowding, renovate, construct, acquire classrooms, sites, equipment, facilities, by issuing $99 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual independent audits, qualify for State matching funds, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 795, "no_votes": 486, "total_votes": 1281, "percent_yes": 62.06088992974239, "percent_no": 37.93911007025761, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.893540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.924954", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade local schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School District make essential safety repairs, fix or replace leaky and aging roofs, keep schools clean and well-maintained, update science labs, classrooms and technology, prevent classroom overcrowding, renovate, construct, acquire classrooms, sites, equipment, facilities, by issuing $99 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual independent audits, qualify for State matching funds, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5423, "fingerprint": "2014|201400022|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400022|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "fcd32bff0a6d14a0", "measure_id": "201400022", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To properly maintain Santa Cruz County parks, facilities, beach access, and open space; clean bathrooms; repair roofs and electrical systems; keep facilities open and safe; provide recreation to children, teenagers, families, and seniors: shall Santa Cruz County levy an annual tax of $8.50 per improved parcel, replacing an expiring service charge on residential units within the County\u2019s Park and Recreation District, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19438, "no_votes": 6065, "total_votes": 25503, "percent_yes": 76.21848409990982, "percent_no": 23.781515900090184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.891103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.923400", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To properly maintain Santa Cruz County parks, facilities, beach access, and open space; clean bathrooms; repair roofs and electrical systems; keep facilities open and safe; provide recreation to children, teenagers, families, and seniors: shall Santa Cruz County levy an annual tax of $8.50 per improved parcel, replacing an expiring service charge on residential units within the County\u2019s Park and Recreation District, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5428, "fingerprint": "2014|201400139|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400139|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "90295725986efe3e", "measure_id": "201400139", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fight crime, respond quickly to medical emergencies and fires, keep youth on the right track and make Watsonville safer by: adding firefighters and police; increasing neighborhood police patrols; updating firefighter safety equipment and stations; improving youth programs to fight gangs and reduce violence; shall Watsonville enact a one-half cent sales tax for seven years, with all funds restricted to these specific uses, subject to independent citizen\u2019s oversight, annual audits, and protected from government takeaways?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3025, "no_votes": 1475, "total_votes": 4500, "percent_yes": 67.22222222222223, "percent_no": 32.77777777777777, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.892591", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.924366", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fight crime, respond quickly to medical emergencies and fires, keep youth on the right track and make Watsonville safer by: adding firefighters and police; increasing neighborhood police patrols; updating firefighter safety equipment and stations; improving youth programs to fight gangs and reduce violence; shall Watsonville enact a one-half cent sales tax for seven years, with all funds restricted to these specific uses, subject to independent citizen\u2019s oversight, annual audits, and protected from government takeaways?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5424, "fingerprint": "2014|201400023|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400023|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "0be76a6fba31ff2c", "measure_id": "201400023", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Section 406 of the City Charter be changed and subdivision (k) of Section 1503 be added to the City Charter to require a vacant (as defined) Council seat be filled only by voters at either a General Municipal Election or a Special Municipal Election rather than by Council election, required to be held within ninety (90) days after the vacancy (as defined) occurs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2813, "no_votes": 1610, "total_votes": 4423, "percent_yes": 63.599366945512095, "percent_no": 36.400633054487905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.891417", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.923604", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 406 of the City Charter be changed and subdivision (k) of Section 1503 be added to the City Charter to require a vacant (as defined) Council seat be filled only by voters at either a General Municipal Election or a Special Municipal Election rather than by Council election, required to be held within ninety (90) days after the vacancy (as defined) occurs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5425, "fingerprint": "2014|201400024|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400024|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "d497db3364590319", "measure_id": "201400024", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Sections 500 and 504 of the Watsonville City Charter be changed so that the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore are required to be selected in numerical order according to the District number where they reside rather than elected by the Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2681, "no_votes": 1734, "total_votes": 4415, "percent_yes": 60.72480181200453, "percent_no": 39.27519818799547, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.891744", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.923793", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 500 and 504 of the Watsonville City Charter be changed so that the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore are required to be selected in numerical order according to the District number where they reside rather than elected by the Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5426, "fingerprint": "2014|201400025|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400025|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "e4511b2ea9184f18", "measure_id": "201400025", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Watsonville Municipal Code be amended to add a procedure that requires public places (as defined) be named only after being nominated by a member of the City Council and voted upon by voters in the City of Watsonville at a General or Special Municipal Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2740, "no_votes": 1693, "total_votes": 4433, "percent_yes": 61.80915858335213, "percent_no": 38.19084141664787, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.892046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.923984", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Watsonville Municipal Code be amended to add a procedure that requires public places (as defined) be named only after being nominated by a member of the City Council and voted upon by voters in the City of Watsonville at a General or Special Municipal Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5427, "fingerprint": "2014|201400066|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400066|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ee9e847b8c96216d", "measure_id": "201400066", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect the quality of life in Santa Cruz County and to fund essential county services such as police, fire, emergency response, health services, youth and senior programs, job creation, housing, environmental protection, and animal shelter programs; shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax of no more than 10% (7% when enacted) on gross receipts of cannabis (medical marijuana) businesses in the unincorporated county, subject to audits, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54928, "no_votes": 15912, "total_votes": 70840, "percent_yes": 77.53811405985319, "percent_no": 22.461885940146814, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.892315", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.924174", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of life in Santa Cruz County and to fund essential county services such as police, fire, emergency response, health services, youth and senior programs, job creation, housing, environmental protection, and animal shelter programs; shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax of no more than 10% (7% when enacted) on gross receipts of cannabis (medical marijuana) businesses in the unincorporated county, subject to audits, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5430, "fingerprint": "2014|201400334|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400334|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "0b6f50736151513c", "measure_id": "201400334", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect the quality of life in the City of Santa Cruz and to fund essential city services such as police, fire, emergency response, youth and senior programs, job creation, housing, and environmental protection, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax of no more than 10% (7% when enacted) on gross receipts of cannabis (marijuana) businesses in the city, subject to audits, with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13894, "no_votes": 3007, "total_votes": 16901, "percent_yes": 82.20815336370629, "percent_no": 17.791846636293712, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.893269", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.924762", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of life in the City of Santa Cruz and to fund essential city services such as police, fire, emergency response, youth and senior programs, job creation, housing, and environmental protection, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax of no more than 10% (7% when enacted) on gross receipts of cannabis (marijuana) businesses in the city, subject to audits, with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5429, "fingerprint": "2014|201400180|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400180|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "90ad61a305117611", "measure_id": "201400180", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Capitola adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.32.030 of the Municipal Code raising the transient occupancy tax rate from 10% to 11%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1342, "no_votes": 1565, "total_votes": 2907, "percent_yes": 46.16443068455452, "percent_no": 53.83556931544548, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.892962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.924571", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Capitola adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.32.030 of the Municipal Code raising the transient occupancy tax rate from 10% to 11%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11357, "fingerprint": "2014|201400092|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400092|SHASTA", "content_hash": "656b623997a0fe8c", "measure_id": "201400092", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Anderson Ordinance No. 785, authorizing the City of Anderson to collect a one-half cent sales tax for essential general city services, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 638, "no_votes": 558, "total_votes": 1196, "percent_yes": 53.34448160535117, "percent_no": 46.65551839464883, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.941077", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.895344", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.925566", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Anderson Ordinance No. 785, authorizing the City of Anderson to collect a one-half cent sales tax for essential general city services, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5433, "fingerprint": "2014|201400067|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400067|SHASTA", "content_hash": "c517931bdc24f916", "measure_id": "201400067", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance SCC 2014-02 (Medical Marijuana Cultivation in the County\u2019s Unincorporated Area) be Adopted? Amends current Shasta County medical marijuana cultivation restrictions for the County\u2019s unincorporated area to, among other things: (1) prohibit the outdoor cultivation of marijuana, (2) limit the cultivation of marijuana per premises to a total of twelve plants within a structure that is detached from and accessory to a residence of a quali\ufb01ed medical marijuana patient or primary caregiver of a quali\ufb01ed medical marijuana patient, (3) prohibit the unlawful surface drawing of water and unlawful discharges of water related to marijuana cultivation, (4) require that if the person cultivating marijuana is not the owner of the property, notarized statements from all legal owners consenting to the cultivation must be obtained, (5) make any violation of the marijuana cultivation restrictions a misdemeanor, and (6) amend residential accessory building requirements.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32992, "no_votes": 24066, "total_votes": 57058, "percent_yes": 57.82186547022328, "percent_no": 42.17813452977672, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.894611", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.925344", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance SCC 2014-02 (Medical Marijuana Cultivation in the County\u2019s Unincorporated Area) be Adopted? Amends current Shasta County medical marijuana cultivation restrictions for the County\u2019s unincorporated area to, among other things: (1) prohibit the outdoor cultivation of marijuana, (2) limit the cultivation of marijuana per premises to a total of twelve plants within a structure that is detached from and accessory to a residence of a quali\ufb01ed medical marijuana patient or primary caregiver of a quali\ufb01ed medical marijuana patient, (3) prohibit the unlawful surface drawing of water and unlawful discharges of water related to marijuana cultivation, (4) require that if the person cultivating marijuana is not the owner of the property, notarized statements from all legal owners consenting to the cultivation must be obtained, (5) make any violation of the marijuana cultivation restrictions a misdemeanor, and (6) amend residential accessory building requirements.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11358, "fingerprint": "2014|201400305|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400305|SHASTA", "content_hash": "47c3f3b832e4b572", "measure_id": "201400305", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the portion of Resolution No. 2014-025 approving a Purchase and Sale Agreement with The McConnell Foundation to sell 14.17 acres within the 60 acres of land currently leased to the Turtle Bay Exploration Park for the price of $600,000, an amount which exceeds the highest appraised value of the City\u2019s leased-fee interest by $157,000, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14607, "no_votes": 12693, "total_votes": 27300, "percent_yes": 53.50549450549451, "percent_no": 46.49450549450549, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.941450", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.896323", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.925955", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the portion of Resolution No. 2014-025 approving a Purchase and Sale Agreement with The McConnell Foundation to sell 14.17 acres within the 60 acres of land currently leased to the Turtle Bay Exploration Park for the price of $600,000, an amount which exceeds the highest appraised value of the City\u2019s leased-fee interest by $157,000, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5434, "fingerprint": "2014|201400093|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400093|SHASTA", "content_hash": "b194b96b389a7a57", "measure_id": "201400093", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Anderson allocate 50% of the tax revenue collected from the one-half cent sales tax to Police Department to mitigate impacts of Prison Realignment (AB109) and increase Police Department staffing to implement programs to reduce crime and increase public safety, and allocate the remainder to support parks, code enforcement, restore general fund reserves, and other general city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 776, "no_votes": 387, "total_votes": 1163, "percent_yes": 66.72398968185726, "percent_no": 33.27601031814274, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.895909", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.925761", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Anderson allocate 50% of the tax revenue collected from the one-half cent sales tax to Police Department to mitigate impacts of Prison Realignment (AB109) and increase Police Department staffing to implement programs to reduce crime and increase public safety, and allocate the remainder to support parks, code enforcement, restore general fund reserves, and other general city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11359, "fingerprint": "2014|201400390|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400390|SHASTA", "content_hash": "e3f4e9b5601289e7", "measure_id": "201400390", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to minimize borrowing costs imposed on local property taxpayers in the District and to refinance construction of the local school gymnasium and restrooms for school and community use, shall Happy Valley Union School District issue $2,495,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 724, "no_votes": 422, "total_votes": 1146, "percent_yes": 63.17626527050611, "percent_no": 36.82373472949389, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.942007", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.897602", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.926550", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to minimize borrowing costs imposed on local property taxpayers in the District and to refinance construction of the local school gymnasium and restrooms for school and community use, shall Happy Valley Union School District issue $2,495,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5436, "fingerprint": "2014|201400346|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400346|SHASTA", "content_hash": "4492b1c8663d0a8a", "measure_id": "201400346", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for general City services, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax at a rate initially set at 6%, and not to exceed 10%, of gross receipts on Medical Marijuana Collectives and Cooperatives operating in the City of Shasta Lake?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2022, "no_votes": 741, "total_votes": 2763, "percent_yes": 73.1813246471227, "percent_no": 26.818675352877307, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.897193", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.926355", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for general City services, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax at a rate initially set at 6%, and not to exceed 10%, of gross receipts on Medical Marijuana Collectives and Cooperatives operating in the City of Shasta Lake?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5437, "fingerprint": "2014|201400445|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400445|SHASTA", "content_hash": "508ff9f876dc7b2d", "measure_id": "201400445", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade outdated electrical, plumbing, and HVAC systems; make safety and security improvements; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace 20-year-old or older portable classrooms with permanent classrooms; and improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall Columbia Elementary School District issue $8,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1984, "no_votes": 1518, "total_votes": 3502, "percent_yes": 56.653340948029694, "percent_no": 43.346659051970306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.898030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.926741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade outdated electrical, plumbing, and HVAC systems; make safety and security improvements; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace 20-year-old or older portable classrooms with permanent classrooms; and improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall Columbia Elementary School District issue $8,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5435, "fingerprint": "2014|201400306|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400306|SHASTA", "content_hash": "524728e9c7ecbe4e", "measure_id": "201400306", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Redding adopt a one-quarter cent transactions and use tax to sunset in six years, for the special purpose of reducing crime and public nuisances associated with effects of AB 109 and other criminal activity by hiring additional police of\ufb01cers and personnel within Redding Police Department; funding offender work programs; and funding incarceration outside the County, to address problems associated with release of criminals due to lack of jail space?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15121, "no_votes": 11994, "total_votes": 27115, "percent_yes": 55.7661810805827, "percent_no": 44.2338189194173, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.896684", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.926157", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Redding adopt a one-quarter cent transactions and use tax to sunset in six years, for the special purpose of reducing crime and public nuisances associated with effects of AB 109 and other criminal activity by hiring additional police of\ufb01cers and personnel within Redding Police Department; funding offender work programs; and funding incarceration outside the County, to address problems associated with release of criminals due to lack of jail space?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11360, "fingerprint": "2014|201400138|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400138|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "901e87c53c5232aa", "measure_id": "201400138", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Randy Darrow be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember, City of Tulelake?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65, "no_votes": 65, "total_votes": 130, "percent_yes": 50.0, "percent_no": 50.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.943130", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.899664", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.927714", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Randy Darrow be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember, City of Tulelake?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5441, "fingerprint": "2014|201400103|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400103|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "23963f465116a594", "measure_id": "201400103", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Leslie Wilde be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember, City of Dnsmuir?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 394, "no_votes": 124, "total_votes": 518, "percent_yes": 76.06177606177607, "percent_no": 23.938223938223928, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.899326", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.927521", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Leslie Wilde be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember, City of Dnsmuir?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5439, "fingerprint": "2014|201400026|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400026|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "a287e4ae0aaec7fc", "measure_id": "201400026", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing the Republic of Jefferson Territory with the boundaries of all Siskiyou county?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6219, "no_votes": 5009, "total_votes": 11228, "percent_yes": 55.3883149269683, "percent_no": 44.6116850730317, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.898656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.927134", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing the Republic of Jefferson Territory with the boundaries of all Siskiyou county?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5438, "fingerprint": "2014|201400012|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400012|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "8568e43ad10433f0", "measure_id": "201400012", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain local fire protection, emergency medical and police fist responder services for properties within Lake Shastina Community Service District, so that victims of crime, heart attack, stroke and fire emergencies can receive rapid response, shall the existing police and fire special taxes be replaced with a public safety tax of $124 per parcel annually, subject to yearly adjustment for six years, and collected per District policy, with all revenure staying in our community.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 443, "no_votes": 335, "total_votes": 778, "percent_yes": 56.94087403598972, "percent_no": 43.05912596401028, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.898368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.926943", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain local fire protection, emergency medical and police fist responder services for properties within Lake Shastina Community Service District, so that victims of crime, heart attack, stroke and fire emergencies can receive rapid response, shall the existing police and fire special taxes be replaced with a public safety tax of $124 per parcel annually, subject to yearly adjustment for six years, and collected per District policy, with all revenure staying in our community.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5447, "fingerprint": "2014|201400548|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400548|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "8512b1b02874b267", "measure_id": "201400548", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Yreka High with funding that cannot be taken by the State, providing all student programs on a single site through the construction of fine arts and gymnasium facilities on campus, upgrade/renovate facilities and make health and safety improvements, shall the Yreka Union High School District issue $8 million of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries with funds being spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2942, "no_votes": 2374, "total_votes": 5316, "percent_yes": 55.34236267870579, "percent_no": 44.65763732129421, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.901673", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.928965", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Yreka High with funding that cannot be taken by the State, providing all student programs on a single site through the construction of fine arts and gymnasium facilities on campus, upgrade/renovate facilities and make health and safety improvements, shall the Yreka Union High School District issue $8 million of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for salaries with funds being spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5446, "fingerprint": "2014|201400364|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400364|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "e5590da9d18c4449", "measure_id": "201400364", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Weed adopt an Ordinance amending 3.24.040 of the Municipal Code to increase the rate of the City's Sales and Use Tax by 0.25% to fund the operation, maintenance, and improvement of a public library operated within the city limits of the City of Weed, to fund a portion of the costs of providing senior programs and services, and for general municipal purposes including police, fire protection and street maintenance and improvements?[", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 760, "no_votes": 1197, "total_votes": 1957, "percent_yes": 38.83495145631068, "percent_no": 61.16504854368932, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.901351", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.928773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Weed adopt an Ordinance amending 3.24.040 of the Municipal Code to increase the rate of the City's Sales and Use Tax by 0.25% to fund the operation, maintenance, and improvement of a public library operated within the city limits of the City of Weed, to fund a portion of the costs of providing senior programs and services, and for general municipal purposes including police, fire protection and street maintenance and improvements?[", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5443, "fingerprint": "2014|201400358|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400358|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "badbfc35e02fc2bf", "measure_id": "201400358", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve the Yreka's Quality of Life shall a ordinance be enacted for a local sales tax of one-quarter of one percent, solely for 1) Advancing Culture, the Arts and Entertainment thereby stimulating business; and/or 2) Advancing Education and Youth Activities in the City of Yreka thereby stimulating business; and 3) Operational expenses of an overseeing independent nonprofit corporation that expires in six years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 343, "no_votes": 220, "total_votes": 563, "percent_yes": 60.92362344582594, "percent_no": 39.07637655417406, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.900436", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.928094", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the Yreka's Quality of Life shall a ordinance be enacted for a local sales tax of one-quarter of one percent, solely for 1) Advancing Culture, the Arts and Entertainment thereby stimulating business; and/or 2) Advancing Education and Youth Activities in the City of Yreka thereby stimulating business; and 3) Operational expenses of an overseeing independent nonprofit corporation that expires in six years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5444, "fingerprint": "2014|201400359|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400359|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "60995cbadb2f68c5", "measure_id": "201400359", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Weed prohibit the outdoor growth of medical Marijuana?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 291, "no_votes": 281, "total_votes": 572, "percent_yes": 50.87412587412587, "percent_no": 49.12587412587413, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.900762", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.928289", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Weed prohibit the outdoor growth of medical Marijuana?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5445, "fingerprint": "2014|201400360|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400360|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "5da69a5945db08ad", "measure_id": "201400360", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Weed permit the licensing and operation of one or more medical Marijuana dispensaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 261, "no_votes": 310, "total_votes": 571, "percent_yes": 45.7092819614711, "percent_no": 54.2907180385289, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.901079", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.928576", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Weed permit the licensing and operation of one or more medical Marijuana dispensaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5440, "fingerprint": "2014|201400068|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400068|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "0d727f6724eabcb3", "measure_id": "201400068", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you support the establishment of the Karuk Tribe\u2019s proposed casino in Yreka, California?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6268, "no_votes": 7466, "total_votes": 13734, "percent_yes": 45.63856123489151, "percent_no": 54.36143876510849, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.899006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.927326", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you support the establishment of the Karuk Tribe\u2019s proposed casino in Yreka, California?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5442, "fingerprint": "2014|201400203|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400203|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "0e6a0be548b360e6", "measure_id": "201400203", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent cuts and preserve and improve city services, including: maintaining and improving services at the Dunsmuir Public Library and making improvements to the Dunsmuir Community Building, shall the City of Dunsmuir adopt an ordinance extending and increasing the existing local sales tax by one-quarter percent, for ten years, providing locally controlled funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 322, "no_votes": 195, "total_votes": 517, "percent_yes": 62.28239845261122, "percent_no": 37.71760154738878, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.900064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.927904", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent cuts and preserve and improve city services, including: maintaining and improving services at the Dunsmuir Public Library and making improvements to the Dunsmuir Community Building, shall the City of Dunsmuir adopt an ordinance extending and increasing the existing local sales tax by one-quarter percent, for ten years, providing locally controlled funding that cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5452, "fingerprint": "2014|201400540|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400540|SOLANO", "content_hash": "a208eb91681271df", "measure_id": "201400540", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; provide equity among district schools; replace roofing, renovate aging plumbing and inadequate electrical systems; increase student access to computers/technology; make security/safety improvements; upgrade/modernize/construct classrooms; and improve athletic fields/facilities for school and community use, shall the Vacaville Unified School District issue $194,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12095, "no_votes": 7429, "total_votes": 19524, "percent_yes": 61.94939561565253, "percent_no": 38.05060438434747, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.903253", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.929945", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; provide equity among district schools; replace roofing, renovate aging plumbing and inadequate electrical systems; increase student access to computers/technology; make security/safety improvements; upgrade/modernize/construct classrooms; and improve athletic fields/facilities for school and community use, shall the Vacaville Unified School District issue $194,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5448, "fingerprint": "2014|201400162|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400162|SOLANO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201400162", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4137, "no_votes": 4633, "total_votes": 8770, "percent_yes": 47.17217787913341, "percent_no": 52.82782212086659, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.901995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.929170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5449, "fingerprint": "2014|201400163|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400163|SOLANO", "content_hash": "02ea3b19b903a40e", "measure_id": "201400163", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain Benicia\u2019s status as a full-service city, improve/maintain Police patrols, fire/ 9-1-1 response times; road  conditions; pothole repair; clean water; storm drains to protect the Carquinez Strait; business attraction/job creation; park maintenance;  other city services, shall the City of Benicia enact a one cent sales tax with authority to incur bonded indebtedness to accelerate infrastructure projects, requiring  independent annual audits, Citizens\u2019 Oversight, all revenue for Benicia, none  for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5827, "no_votes": 3407, "total_votes": 9234, "percent_yes": 63.10374702187568, "percent_no": 36.89625297812432, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.902310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.929361", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain Benicia\u2019s status as a full-service city, improve/maintain Police patrols, fire/ 9-1-1 response times; road  conditions; pothole repair; clean water; storm drains to protect the Carquinez Strait; business attraction/job creation; park maintenance;  other city services, shall the City of Benicia enact a one cent sales tax with authority to incur bonded indebtedness to accelerate infrastructure projects, requiring  independent annual audits, Citizens\u2019 Oversight, all revenue for Benicia, none  for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5453, "fingerprint": "2014|201400542|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400542|SOLANO", "content_hash": "856e3d16fe1292d2", "measure_id": "201400542", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education in Vallejo schools, increase student safety, and improve student access to technology, by: repairing and upgrading classrooms, deteriorating restrooms, and leaky roofs; making handicapped accessibility improvements; new construction and updating all schools, utilities, heating ventilation/air conditioning, plumbing, security systems, fire safety systems; and upgrading technology infrastructure and science labs, shall Vallejo City Unified School District issue a total of 239 million dollars in bonds, within legal interest rates, and with citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13392, "no_votes": 8384, "total_votes": 21776, "percent_yes": 61.498897869213806, "percent_no": 38.501102130786194, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.903531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.930150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education in Vallejo schools, increase student safety, and improve student access to technology, by: repairing and upgrading classrooms, deteriorating restrooms, and leaky roofs; making handicapped accessibility improvements; new construction and updating all schools, utilities, heating ventilation/air conditioning, plumbing, security systems, fire safety systems; and upgrading technology infrastructure and science labs, shall Vallejo City Unified School District issue a total of 239 million dollars in bonds, within legal interest rates, and with citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5451, "fingerprint": "2014|201400422|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400422|SOLANO", "content_hash": "b44e72c7b31f4419", "measure_id": "201400422", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace deteriorating temporary portables with permanent classrooms; make health, safety, and handicapped accessibitiy improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Winters Joint Unified School District issue $15,000,000 if bonds at leagal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committe and have NO money taken by the state or used fro administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 160, "no_votes": 79, "total_votes": 239, "percent_yes": 66.94560669456067, "percent_no": 33.05439330543933, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.902929", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.929753", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace deteriorating temporary portables with permanent classrooms; make health, safety, and handicapped accessibitiy improvements; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Winters Joint Unified School District issue $15,000,000 if bonds at leagal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committe and have NO money taken by the state or used fro administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5450, "fingerprint": "2014|201400377|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400377|SOLANO", "content_hash": "92662f3a042d9e35", "measure_id": "201400377", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilites; repair or replace roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace temporary portable classrooms; make health, safety and security improvements; and improve athletic fields and facilities for school and community use, shall the Benicia Unified School District issue $49,600 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citisens' oversight committe and NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken my the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3903, "no_votes": 2244, "total_votes": 6147, "percent_yes": 63.49438750610054, "percent_no": 36.50561249389946, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.902584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.929562", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilites; repair or replace roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace temporary portable classrooms; make health, safety and security improvements; and improve athletic fields and facilities for school and community use, shall the Benicia Unified School District issue $49,600 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citisens' oversight committe and NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken my the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5462, "fingerprint": "2014|201400383|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400383|SONOMA", "content_hash": "3c88b2a764256c42", "measure_id": "201400383", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education and student safety with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District improve classrooms, science labs and school libraries to meet modern academic and safety standards; update classroom computers, instructional technology and infrastructure; and replace outdated and inefficient heating, ventilation, electrical and plumbing systems; by issuing $80 million in bonds, at legal rates,with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5382, "no_votes": 3150, "total_votes": 8532, "percent_yes": 63.0801687763713, "percent_no": 36.9198312236287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.906271", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.932013", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education and student safety with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District improve classrooms, science labs and school libraries to meet modern academic and safety standards; update classroom computers, instructional technology and infrastructure; and replace outdated and inefficient heating, ventilation, electrical and plumbing systems; by issuing $80 million in bonds, at legal rates,with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5461, "fingerprint": "2014|201400376|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400376|SONOMA", "content_hash": "cda8d66977b98129", "measure_id": "201400376", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To avoid overcrowding, continue to renovate and modernize its aging schools and classrooms, build new classrooms, rehabilitate buildings and grounds, improve energy efficiency, purchase solar panels and equipment, and repair, replace, acquire, construct, and rehabilitate school facilities, shall the Bellevue Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrator salaries and an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1314, "no_votes": 797, "total_votes": 2111, "percent_yes": 62.24538133585978, "percent_no": 37.75461866414022, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.905948", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.931817", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid overcrowding, continue to renovate and modernize its aging schools and classrooms, build new classrooms, rehabilitate buildings and grounds, improve energy efficiency, purchase solar panels and equipment, and repair, replace, acquire, construct, and rehabilitate school facilities, shall the Bellevue Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrator salaries and an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5463, "fingerprint": "2014|201400404|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400404|SONOMA", "content_hash": "2650667b44a6b10a", "measure_id": "201400404", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize or renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Petaluma City (Elementary) School District issue $21,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries with all funds being spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4652, "no_votes": 2161, "total_votes": 6813, "percent_yes": 68.28122706590342, "percent_no": 31.718772934096577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.906687", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.932204", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and modernize or renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall the Petaluma City (Elementary) School District issue $21,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries with all funds being spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5464, "fingerprint": "2014|201400411|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400411|SONOMA", "content_hash": "75dfb672530b0eda", "measure_id": "201400411", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue critical renovation, modernization and safety upgrades to District schools, add classrooms to avoid overcrowding, make needed upgrades to libraries, science and computer labs, improve access to classroom technology, improve energy efficiency to save money, and renovate, construct, acquire classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, shall Rincon Valley Union School District issue $35,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting high quality education for local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6816, "no_votes": 3393, "total_votes": 10209, "percent_yes": 66.76461945342345, "percent_no": 33.23538054657655, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.924074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.932588", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue critical renovation, modernization and safety upgrades to District schools, add classrooms to avoid overcrowding, make needed upgrades to libraries, science and computer labs, improve access to classroom technology, improve energy efficiency to save money, and renovate, construct, acquire classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, shall Rincon Valley Union School District issue $35,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting high quality education for local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5455, "fingerprint": "2014|201400097|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400097|SONOMA", "content_hash": "b15066fbb0e5a231", "measure_id": "201400097", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain Cotati as a viable, independent, financially stable City, address State takeaways, prevent potential Police Department elimination/permanent service cuts, and maintain law enforcement staffing levels and other City services, including domestic violence response, street paving, and pothole repair, shall the City of Cotati extend its existing Measure A sales tax and set the rate at 1\u00a2 for nine years, with independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 922, "no_votes": 808, "total_votes": 1730, "percent_yes": 53.29479768786128, "percent_no": 46.70520231213872, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.904084", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.930538", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain Cotati as a viable, independent, financially stable City, address State takeaways, prevent potential Police Department elimination/permanent service cuts, and maintain law enforcement staffing levels and other City services, including domestic violence response, street paving, and pothole repair, shall the City of Cotati extend its existing Measure A sales tax and set the rate at 1\u00a2 for nine years, with independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5469, "fingerprint": "2014|201400530|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400530|SONOMA", "content_hash": "aca8bc95bcecc7a0", "measure_id": "201400530", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade facilities, prepare students for careers/university transfer, attract quality faculty, keep SRJC current,improve student access, upgrade classrooms/labs/technology for 21st Century science/math skills, modernize career education facilities for vocational engineering, nursing, public safety, agriculture, jobs, meet earthquake/fire codes, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Sonoma County Junior College District issue $410,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizens' oversight, annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64500, "no_votes": 39760, "total_votes": 104260, "percent_yes": 61.8645693458661, "percent_no": 38.1354306541339, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.942719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.933740", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade facilities, prepare students for careers/university transfer, attract quality faculty, keep SRJC current,improve student access, upgrade classrooms/labs/technology for 21st Century science/math skills, modernize career education facilities for vocational engineering, nursing, public safety, agriculture, jobs, meet earthquake/fire codes, acquire, construct/repair classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, shall Sonoma County Junior College District issue $410,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizens' oversight, annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5468, "fingerprint": "2014|201400527|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400527|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a41d8fdc26193dd9", "measure_id": "201400527", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve high school educational quality and student safety by upgrading classrooms and science labs, replacing deteriorating and outdated plumbing, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems, providing updated 21st century classroom technology, and acquiring, renovating or constructing classrooms, equipment, sites and facilities, shall Santa Rosa High School District issue $175 million in bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries and all funds benefitting local schools (State cannot take the funds)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24982, "no_votes": 14694, "total_votes": 39676, "percent_yes": 62.96501663474141, "percent_no": 37.03498336525859, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.942406", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.933548", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve high school educational quality and student safety by upgrading classrooms and science labs, replacing deteriorating and outdated plumbing, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems, providing updated 21st century classroom technology, and acquiring, renovating or constructing classrooms, equipment, sites and facilities, shall Santa Rosa High School District issue $175 million in bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries and all funds benefitting local schools (State cannot take the funds)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5465, "fingerprint": "2014|201400443|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400443|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a306a9327c4692fc", "measure_id": "201400443", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Cinnabar Elementary School District issue $2,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 361, "no_votes": 252, "total_votes": 613, "percent_yes": 58.89070146818924, "percent_no": 41.10929853181076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.924439", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.932779", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the state; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; and improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Cinnabar Elementary School District issue $2,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5466, "fingerprint": "2014|201400504|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400504|SONOMA", "content_hash": "7bbc356e8335c8e3", "measure_id": "201400504", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated windows; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and replace aging portables; shall the Oak Grove Union School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with audits and independent citizens' oversight and no money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 856, "no_votes": 511, "total_votes": 1367, "percent_yes": 62.6188734455011, "percent_no": 37.3811265544989, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.941162", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.933161", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace outdated windows; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and replace aging portables; shall the Oak Grove Union School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with audits and independent citizens' oversight and no money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5467, "fingerprint": "2014|201400526|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400526|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4cf02560e063a7ce", "measure_id": "201400526", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of elementary education and student safety by repairing/ replacing leaky roofs, repairing deteriorating plumbing/ sewer/ electrical systems, providing updated 21st century classroom technology, upgrading security/ fire alarms, making health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements, and acquiring, renovating or constructing classrooms, equipment, sites and facilities, shall Santa Rosa Elementary School District issue $54 million in bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, no funds used for administrators' salaries or taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8103, "no_votes": 3797, "total_votes": 11900, "percent_yes": 68.09243697478992, "percent_no": 31.90756302521008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.941586", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.933355", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of elementary education and student safety by repairing/ replacing leaky roofs, repairing deteriorating plumbing/ sewer/ electrical systems, providing updated 21st century classroom technology, upgrading security/ fire alarms, making health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements, and acquiring, renovating or constructing classrooms, equipment, sites and facilities, shall Santa Rosa Elementary School District issue $54 million in bonds at legal rates, including independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, no funds used for administrators' salaries or taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5454, "fingerprint": "2014|201400069|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400069|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ed92abb1e64f1adf", "measure_id": "201400069", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Sonoma County Library Improvement Act be implemented by imposing a one-eighth cent (0.125%) sales tax for ten years to restore and enhance library hours and services to benefit children, seniors and all residents of the County; with an annual audit to be conducted to ensure that funds are spent as mandated by the voters; and an increase in spending limit to allow use of the revenue?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65973, "no_votes": 40034, "total_votes": 106007, "percent_yes": 62.23456941522729, "percent_no": 37.76543058477271, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.903806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.930346", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sonoma County Library Improvement Act be implemented by imposing a one-eighth cent (0.125%) sales tax for ten years to restore and enhance library hours and services to benefit children, seniors and all residents of the County; with an annual audit to be conducted to ensure that funds are spent as mandated by the voters; and an increase in spending limit to allow use of the revenue?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5459, "fingerprint": "2014|201400341|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400341|SONOMA", "content_hash": "3c83d6f84d3f742d", "measure_id": "201400341", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Utility Users Tax Ordinance (UUT) be amended to: reduce the tax rate from 5% to 4.5%; exempt low income users; modernize the ordinance to include wireless and other technologies to treat taxpayers the same regardless of technology; and help maintain essential city services, with all money staying local for services and facilities in Santa Rosa?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14466, "no_votes": 16531, "total_votes": 30997, "percent_yes": 46.66903248701488, "percent_no": 53.33096751298512, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.905377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.931327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Utility Users Tax Ordinance (UUT) be amended to: reduce the tax rate from 5% to 4.5%; exempt low income users; modernize the ordinance to include wireless and other technologies to treat taxpayers the same regardless of technology; and help maintain essential city services, with all money staying local for services and facilities in Santa Rosa?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5456, "fingerprint": "2014|201400187|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400187|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f7a7d09e49e6334f", "measure_id": "201400187", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To create local funding for local needs; maintain Cloverdale's independent, local Police Department; prevent further cuts to police officers, 911 response, violent/property crimes investigation; maintain storm drains, pothole/street repair, local business support, and other City services; shall the City of Cloverdale establish a utility user tax at a 3% rate for eight years with low-income senior exemptions, citizens' oversight, annual independent audits and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1086, "no_votes": 996, "total_votes": 2082, "percent_yes": 52.1613832853026, "percent_no": 47.8386167146974, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.904461", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.930738", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To create local funding for local needs; maintain Cloverdale's independent, local Police Department; prevent further cuts to police officers, 911 response, violent/property crimes investigation; maintain storm drains, pothole/street repair, local business support, and other City services; shall the City of Cloverdale establish a utility user tax at a 3% rate for eight years with low-income senior exemptions, citizens' oversight, annual independent audits and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5457, "fingerprint": "2014|201400227|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400227|SONOMA", "content_hash": "48474a610295f0f4", "measure_id": "201400227", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Healdsburg continue to fluoridate its water?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2184, "no_votes": 1113, "total_votes": 3297, "percent_yes": 66.2420382165605, "percent_no": 33.7579617834395, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.904769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.930936", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Healdsburg continue to fluoridate its water?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5458, "fingerprint": "2014|201400291|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400291|SONOMA", "content_hash": "935f5a99b1f4bde6", "measure_id": "201400291", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the BETTER ROADS SAFER PETALUMA MEASURE, a general transactions and use tax of 1%, with all proceeds placed in the Petaluma General Fund for governmental purposes such as street and sidewalk maintenance and repair, traffic improvements like the Rainier Crosstown Connector/Interchange, flood protection, storm drainage, vehicle replacement, restoring public safety positions, and public facilities improvements, among others, with local control of tax proceeds, and independent review and reporting on expenditures, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6195, "no_votes": 8030, "total_votes": 14225, "percent_yes": 43.55008787346221, "percent_no": 56.44991212653779, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.905040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.931130", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the BETTER ROADS SAFER PETALUMA MEASURE, a general transactions and use tax of 1%, with all proceeds placed in the Petaluma General Fund for governmental purposes such as street and sidewalk maintenance and repair, traffic improvements like the Rainier Crosstown Connector/Interchange, flood protection, storm drainage, vehicle replacement, restoring public safety positions, and public facilities improvements, among others, with local control of tax proceeds, and independent review and reporting on expenditures, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5460, "fingerprint": "2014|201400345|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400345|SONOMA", "content_hash": "83478dabf4b82ecb", "measure_id": "201400345", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Sebastopol amend the current Utility User Tax ordinance by: reducing the tax from 4% to 3.75%; continuing the tax on gas and electricity which exempts low income persons; adding telecommunications, video and garbage services; to maintain essential general fund City services such as police and fire, improving roads, sewers, parks, bicycle/pedestrian infrastructure; requiring an independent audit; and no rate increase without voter approval; and terminating the tax in ten years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1448, "no_votes": 906, "total_votes": 2354, "percent_yes": 61.51231945624469, "percent_no": 38.48768054375531, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.905660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.931563", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Sebastopol amend the current Utility User Tax ordinance by: reducing the tax from 4% to 3.75%; continuing the tax on gas and electricity which exempts low income persons; adding telecommunications, video and garbage services; to maintain essential general fund City services such as police and fire, improving roads, sewers, parks, bicycle/pedestrian infrastructure; requiring an independent audit; and no rate increase without voter approval; and terminating the tax in ten years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5472, "fingerprint": "2014|201400351|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400351|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "e117a4c2ede49b6d", "measure_id": "201400351", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Turlock be elected by districts described in Ordinance No. 1197CS and the Mayor of the City of Turlock be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9685, "no_votes": 3446, "total_votes": 13131, "percent_yes": 73.7567588150179, "percent_no": 26.243241184982097, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.943582", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.934310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Turlock be elected by districts described in Ordinance No. 1197CS and the Mayor of the City of Turlock be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5473, "fingerprint": "2014|201400352|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400352|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "f0617bd677bc679a", "measure_id": "201400352", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance establishing a one-half of one percent local road transactions and use (sales) tax in Turlock, for 7 years, to be used exclusively for construction, reconstruction, replacement, repair and maintenance of existing City streets, sidewalks, and pedestrian/ bicycle improvements, including ADA improvements, with an independent citizens' oversight committee and financial audit ensuring all funds are spent appropriately in Turlock, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8425, "no_votes": 5439, "total_votes": 13864, "percent_yes": 60.76889786497404, "percent_no": 39.23110213502596, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.943910", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.934509", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance establishing a one-half of one percent local road transactions and use (sales) tax in Turlock, for 7 years, to be used exclusively for construction, reconstruction, replacement, repair and maintenance of existing City streets, sidewalks, and pedestrian/ bicycle improvements, including ADA improvements, with an independent citizens' oversight committee and financial audit ensuring all funds are spent appropriately in Turlock, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5471, "fingerprint": "2014|201400274|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400274|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a22202c31618cc7e", "measure_id": "201400274", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the City of Newman General Plan to create an Urban Growth Boundary be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3127, "no_votes": 1327, "total_votes": 4454, "percent_yes": 70.20655590480467, "percent_no": 29.793444095195326, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.943310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.934121", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the City of Newman General Plan to create an Urban Growth Boundary be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5470, "fingerprint": "2014|201400271|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400271|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "d981c0ac070d6ac4", "measure_id": "201400271", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help prevent additional budget cuts and maintain City services, including police and fire protection, senior programs, and other general services, shall the City of Oakdale extend the existing 1/2% cent sales tax set to expire April 2015, for an additional five (5) years, with resident oversight and annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 896, "no_votes": 451, "total_votes": 1347, "percent_yes": 66.51818856718634, "percent_no": 33.48181143281366, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.943003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.933930", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help prevent additional budget cuts and maintain City services, including police and fire protection, senior programs, and other general services, shall the City of Oakdale extend the existing 1/2% cent sales tax set to expire April 2015, for an additional five (5) years, with resident oversight and annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5474, "fingerprint": "2014|201400546|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400546|SUTTER", "content_hash": "e197c76e0418c681", "measure_id": "201400546", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms, libraries, science and computer labs in Woodland Schools with local funding the State cannot take away, shall Woodland Joint Unified School District repair roofs; update classroom computer technology; remove asbestos/hazardous materials; make schools accessible for students with disabilities; and replace boilers, plumbing, sewers, bathrooms and electrical systems by issuing $78 million in bonds at legal rates with independent oversight, mandatory audits and no money for administrator salaries/pensions/benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11, "no_votes": 35, "total_votes": 46, "percent_yes": 23.91304347826087, "percent_no": 76.08695652173913, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.961276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.934911", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms, libraries, science and computer labs in Woodland Schools with local funding the State cannot take away, shall Woodland Joint Unified School District repair roofs; update classroom computer technology; remove asbestos/hazardous materials; make schools accessible for students with disabilities; and replace boilers, plumbing, sewers, bathrooms and electrical systems by issuing $78 million in bonds at legal rates with independent oversight, mandatory audits and no money for administrator salaries/pensions/benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5475, "fingerprint": "2014|201400547|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400547|SUTTER", "content_hash": "740f60be0c358cfc", "measure_id": "201400547", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Woodland Safe and Healthy Schools Measure. To support student health and safety by fixing cracked/potholed pavement; providing lunch/shade shelters for students; repairing/upgrading irrigation systems/drainage for water conservation; repairing/replacing school playgrounds/playfields/physical education facilities; and repairing/upgrading fencing/school security, shall Woodland Joint Unified School District issue $19 million in bonds at legal rates with independent oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrator salaries/pensions/benefits and all funds benefiting Woodland schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9, "no_votes": 37, "total_votes": 46, "percent_yes": 19.565217391304348, "percent_no": 80.43478260869566, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.961700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.935110", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Woodland Safe and Healthy Schools Measure. To support student health and safety by fixing cracked/potholed pavement; providing lunch/shade shelters for students; repairing/upgrading irrigation systems/drainage for water conservation; repairing/replacing school playgrounds/playfields/physical education facilities; and repairing/upgrading fencing/school security, shall Woodland Joint Unified School District issue $19 million in bonds at legal rates with independent oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrator salaries/pensions/benefits and all funds benefiting Woodland schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1363, "fingerprint": "2014|PROP 48|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|PROP 48|Statewide", "content_hash": "2154e47f67775f69", "measure_id": "Proposition 48", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Referendum to Overturn Indian Gaming Compacts", "description": "This petition will place on the statewide ballot a challenge to a state law previously approved by the Legislature and the Governor. The law must then be approved by a majority of voters at the next statewide election to go into effect. The law ratifies two gaming compacts (with the North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians, and the Wiyot Tribe); and it exempts execution of the compacts, certain projects, and intergovernmental agreements from the California Environmental Quality Act. (13-0007.)", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.1, "percent_no": 60.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Popular Referendum", "topic_primary": "Gambling & Lotteries", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have ratified two gaming compacts with Native American tri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have ratified two gaming compacts with Native American tribes (the North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians and the Wiyot Tribe) and exempted the execution of these compacts and related projects from California Environmental Quality Act requirements.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Referendum to Overturn Indian Gaming Compacts", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Referendum%20to%20Overturn%20Indian%20Gaming%20Compacts%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1362, "fingerprint": "2014|PROP 47|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|PROP 47|Statewide", "content_hash": "132f92e828961d2e", "measure_id": "Proposition 47", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties.", "description": "Requires misdemeanor sentence instead of felony for petty theft, receiving stolen property, and forging/writing bad checks when value or amount involved is $950 or less. Requires misdemeanor sentence instead of felony for certain drug possession offenses. Allows felony sentence for these offenses if person has previous conviction for crimes such as rape, murder or child molestation or is a registered sex offender. Requires resentencing for persons serving felony sentences for these offenses unless court finds unreasonable public safety risk. Applies savings to mental health and drug treatment programs, K-12 schools, and crime victims. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Net state criminal justice system savings that could reach the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually, which would be spent on truancy prevention, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and victim services. Net county criminal justice system savings that could reach the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually. (13-0060.)", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.4, "percent_no": 41.6, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Criminal Justice", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reclassified certain property crimes (theft, receiving stolen pr...", "summary_text": "This measure reclassified certain property crimes (theft, receiving stolen property, forgery, and bad checks) involving $950 or less and specific drug possession offenses from felonies to misdemeanors, with exceptions for offenders with serious prior convictions. The measure also required resentencing of current felony offenders for these crimes unless a court determined they posed an unreasonable public safety risk, and directed the resulting savings toward mental health treatment, drug programs, schools, and victim services.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties.", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Criminal%20Sentences.%20Misdemeanor%20Penalties.%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1360, "fingerprint": "2014|PROP 46|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|PROP 46|Statewide", "content_hash": "f7c8b7d36ceae6ca", "measure_id": "Proposition 46", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Drug and Alcohol Testing of Doctors. Medical Negligence Lawsuits.", "description": "Requires drug and alcohol testing of doctors and reporting of positive test to the California Medical Board. Requires Board to suspend doctor pending investigation of positive test and take disciplinary action if doctor was impaired while on duty. Requires doctors to report any other doctor suspected of drug or alcohol impairment or medical negligence. Requires health care practitioners to consult state prescription drug history database before prescribing certain controlled substances. Increases $250,000 cap on pain and suffering damages in medical negligence lawsuits to account for inflation. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: State and local government costs associated with higher net medical malpractice costs, likely at least in the low tens of millions of dollars annually, potentially ranging to over one hundred million dollars annually. Potential net state and local government costs associated with changes in the amount and types of health care services that, while highly uncertain, potentially range from minor to hundreds of millions of dollars annually. (13-0016.)", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.800000000000004, "percent_no": 67.19999999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Civil & Constitutional Law", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have required drug and alcohol testing of doctors with mand...", "summary_text": "The measure would have required drug and alcohol testing of doctors with mandatory reporting of positive results, required doctors to report impaired colleagues, mandated consultation of prescription databases before prescribing controlled substances, and increased the cap on pain and suffering damages in medical malpractice lawsuits from $250,000 to adjust for inflation. The Legislative Analyst estimated potential state and local government costs ranging from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars annually.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Drug and Alcohol Testing of Doctors. Medical Negligence Lawsuits.", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Drug%20and%20Alcohol%20Testing%20of%20Doctors.%20Medical%20Negli%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1358, "fingerprint": "2014|PROP 45|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|PROP 45|Statewide", "content_hash": "60d0d787c9108484", "measure_id": "Proposition 45", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Approval of Healthcare Insurance Rate Changes", "description": "Requires health insurance rate changes to be approved by Insurance Commissioner before taking effect. Requires sworn statement by health insurer as to accuracy of information submitted to Insurance Commissioner to justify rate changes. Provides for public notice, disclosure and hearing on health insurance rate changes, and subsequent judicial review. Does not apply to employer large group health plans. Prohibits health, auto and homeowners insurers from determining policy eligibility or rates based on lack of prior coverage or credit history. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Increased state administrative costs ranging in the low millions to low tens of millions of dollars annually to regulate health insurance rates, funded with revenues collected from filing fees paid by health insurance companies. (11-0070)", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.2, "percent_no": 59.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Health", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required the Insurance Commissioner to approve health...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required the Insurance Commissioner to approve health insurance rate changes before they take effect and prohibited health, auto, and homeowners insurers from using lack of prior coverage or credit history to determine eligibility or rates. It would have established a process for public notice, disclosure, hearings, and judicial review of health insurance rate changes, while exempting large employer group plans.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approval of Healthcare Insurance Rate Changes", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Approval%20of%20Healthcare%20Insurance%20Rate%20Changes%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1356, "fingerprint": "2014|PROP 1|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|PROP 1|Statewide", "content_hash": "782b115c8ec53880", "measure_id": "Proposition 1", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Water Bond. Funding for Water Quality, Supply, Treatment, and Storage Projects.", "description": "Relating to a water quality, supply and infrastructure improvement program, by providing the funds necessary therefor through an election for the issuance and sale of bonds of the State of California and for the handling and disposition of those funds, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.  ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.8, "percent_no": 33.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Legislative Referendum", "topic_primary": "Bond Measures", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $7", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $7.5 billion in bonds to fund water infrastructure projects including storage, recycling, groundwater cleanup, and ecosystem restoration. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over approximately 40 years.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Water Bond. Funding for Water Quality, Supply, Treatment, and Storage Projects.", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Water%20Bond.%20Funding%20for%20Water%20Quality%2C%20Supply%2C%20Tre%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1355, "fingerprint": "2014|PROP 42|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|PROP 42|Statewide", "content_hash": "790c778c24abf9d6", "measure_id": "Proposition 42", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "PUBLIC RECORDS. OPEN MEETINGS. STATE REIMBURSEMENT TO LOCAL AGENCIES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.", "description": "Requires local government compliance with laws providing for public access to local government body meetings and records of government officials. Eliminates reimbursement for costs of compliance. Fiscal Impact: Reductions in state payments to local governments in the tens of millions of dollars annually. Potential future costs on local governments in the tens of millions of dollars annually.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.8, "percent_no": 38.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Legislative Referendum", "topic_primary": "Local Government", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required local governments to comply with public access laws for...", "summary_text": "This measure required local governments to comply with public access laws for meetings and records without receiving state reimbursement for compliance costs. It eliminated tens of millions of dollars in annual state payments to local governments while potentially imposing similar costs directly on those governments.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PUBLIC RECORDS. OPEN MEETINGS. STATE REIMBURSEMENT TO LOCAL AGENCIES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=PUBLIC%20RECORDS.%20OPEN%20MEETINGS.%20STATE%20REIMBURSEMENT%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1352, "fingerprint": "2014|PROP 41|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|PROP 41|Statewide", "content_hash": "4bca3babf4b140d2", "measure_id": "Proposition 41", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Veterans Housing & Homeless Bond Act of 2014", "description": "Authorizes $600 million in general obligation bonds for affordable multifamily supportive housing to relieve homelessness, affordable transitional housing, affordable rental housing, or related facilities for veterans and their families. Fiscal Impact: Increased state bond costs averaging about $50 million annually over 15 years.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.4, "percent_no": 34.599999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Legislative Referendum", "topic_primary": "Bond Measures", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized $600 million in general obligation bonds to fund affo...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized $600 million in general obligation bonds to fund affordable housing for veterans and their families, including supportive housing for homeless veterans, transitional housing, and affordable rental housing. The bonds would result in approximately $50 million in annual state costs over 15 years to repay the debt.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Veterans Housing & Homeless Bond Act of 2014", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Veterans%20Housing%20%26%20Homeless%20Bond%20Act%20of%202014%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1335, "fingerprint": "2014|1594|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|1594|Statewide", "content_hash": "e4875c6ac0a38d37", "measure_id": "1594", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Public Assistance Benefits. Eligibility. Initiative Statute.", "description": "Requires adult applicants for public assistance benefits to have California driver's license/identification card and child applicants to have birth certificate and social security card. Prohibits a parent from applying for benefits for a child if the parent is a minor or received any benefits within five years prior to the child's birth. Restricts electronic benefits transfers while beneficiaries are outside the state. Requires certain beneficiaries to seek employment for three months before becoming eligible for employment-related services. Requires additional state and county steps to identify and facilitate employment for those beneficiaries. ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Human Services", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required specific identification documents for public...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required specific identification documents for public assistance applicants, prohibited parents who are minors or recently received benefits from applying for their children, restricted benefit access outside California, and mandated job-seeking periods before accessing employment services. It would have also required additional government efforts to identify and facilitate employment for benefit recipients.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Public Assistance Benefits. Eligibility. Initiative Statute.", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Public%20Assistance%20Benefits.%20Eligibility.%20Initiativ%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1329, "fingerprint": "2014|1587|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|1587|Statewide", "content_hash": "73864976399508bf", "measure_id": "1587", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Taxes to Fund California Public Universities and Community Colleges. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "description": "Imposes new taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel ($0.025 per gallon), alcohol ($0.05-$1.65 per gallon), and cigarettes ($0.0125 each); raises vehicle license fees by 0.5% of vehicle market value. Allocates new revenues 80% to University of California and California State University, 20% to California Community Colleges. Maintains state funding for higher education at or above 2009-2010 levels and student financial aid at or above 2010-2011 levels. Caps student tuition and systemwide fees at 2009-2010 levels. Creates joint commission to recommend cost efficiencies in higher education.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Budgets", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would impose new taxes on gasoline, diesel fuel, alcohol, and ci...", "summary_text": "This measure would impose new taxes on gasoline, diesel fuel, alcohol, and cigarettes while raising vehicle license fees, with 80% of revenues going to UC and CSU systems and 20% to community colleges. It would also cap student tuition at 2009-2010 levels, maintain minimum state funding levels for higher education, and create a commission to recommend cost efficiencies.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Taxes to Fund California Public Universities and Community Colleges. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Taxes%20to%20Fund%20California%20Public%20Universities%20and%20C%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1328, "fingerprint": "2014|1588|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|1588|Statewide", "content_hash": "80ca758c292b0ff7", "measure_id": "1588", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Electricity. Initiative Statute.", "description": "Establishes publicly-owned California Electrical Utility District to provide electric service, replacing most investor-owned utilities, such as PG&E, Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric, and Bear Valley Electric. Exempts publicly-owned electric utilities, unless they voluntarily elect to join. Requires the District be divided into 11 wards, approximately equal in population. Establishes an 11 member board of directors\u2013one member per ward\u2013each elected for 4-year terms. Grants the District the power to acquire property, construct facilities necessary to supply electricity, set electricity rates, impose taxes, and issue bonds.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Energy & Electric Utilities", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a publicly-owned California Electrical Ut...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a publicly-owned California Electrical Utility District to replace most investor-owned utilities like PG&E and Southern California Edison with a state-run utility system. The district would be governed by an 11-member elected board and would have the authority to acquire utility property, set electricity rates, impose taxes, and issue bonds.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Electricity. Initiative Statute.", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Electricity.%20Initiative%20Statute.%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1327, "fingerprint": "2014|1589|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|1589|Statewide", "content_hash": "91864e86810f16fd", "measure_id": "1589", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Nuclear Power. Initiative Statute.", "description": "Extends statutory preconditions, currently applicable to new operation of any nuclear powerplant, to existing Diablo Canyon and San Onofre plants. Before further electricity production at these plants, requires California Energy Commission to find federal government has approved technology for permanent disposal of high-level nuclear waste. For nuclear powerplants requiring reprocessing of fuel rods, requires Commission to find federal government has approved technology for nuclear fuel rod reprocessing plants. Both findings are subject to Legislature's rejection. Further requires Commission to find on case-by-case basis facilities will be available with adequate capacity to reprocess or store powerplant's fuel rods.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Energy & Electric Utilities", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required California's two existing nuclear power plan...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required California's two existing nuclear power plants, Diablo Canyon and San Onofre, to meet the same preconditions as new nuclear plants before continuing electricity production, including federal approval of permanent high-level nuclear waste disposal technology. The measure also would have required case-by-case findings that adequate facilities exist to reprocess or store the plants' fuel rods, with all findings subject to potential legislative rejection.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Nuclear Power. Initiative Statute.", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Nuclear%20Power.%20Initiative%20Statute.%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1324, "fingerprint": "2014|1590|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|1590|Statewide", "content_hash": "4fe9af5a2c2ba605", "measure_id": "1590", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Cigarette Tax to Fund Student Financial Aid at University of California and California State University. Initiative Statute.", "description": "Increases cigarette tax by $1.00 per pack. Allocates revenues to expand financial aid for California residents enrolled at UC or CSU. If new tax causes decreased tobacco consumption, thus reducing existing tobacco-tax revenues, current tobacco funding for tobacco health education/research, medical care, environment, breast cancer research/services, early childhood development, and General Fund will be maintained by transferring new tax revenues to offset decrease. Requires annual independent audit and accounting. Establishes five-member oversight committee. ", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Initiative", "topic_primary": "Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would increase California's cigarette tax by $1", "summary_text": "This measure would increase California's cigarette tax by $1.00 per pack, with revenues primarily directed toward expanding financial aid for UC and CSU students. If the tax increase reduces overall tobacco tax revenues, the new funds would be used to maintain existing tobacco-funded programs for health education, medical care, and other services.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Cigarette Tax to Fund Student Financial Aid at University of California and California State University. Initiative Statute.", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Cigarette%20Tax%20to%20Fund%20Student%20Financial%20Aid%20at%20Uni%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1323, "fingerprint": "2014|PROP 2|Statewide|NCSL", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|PROP 2|Statewide", "content_hash": "e06ce445d049f40a", "measure_id": "Proposition 2", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "State Budget. Budget Stabilization Account.", "description": "This amendment proposed by Assembly Constitutional Amendment 1 of the 2013\u20132014 Second Extraordinary Session (Resolution Chapter 1, 2013\u20132014 Second Extraordinary Session) expressly amends the California Constitution by adding sections thereto and repealing and adding a section thereof; therefore, existing provisions proposed to be deleted are printed in strike out type and new provisions proposed to be added are printed in italic type to indicate that they are new.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.7, "percent_no": 31.299999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Legislative Referendum", "topic_primary": "Budgets", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "NCSL", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment modified California's constitution by adding ne...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment modified California's constitution by adding new sections and repealing and replacing an existing section, though the specific substantive changes are not described in the provided ballot text.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:02", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "State Budget. Budget Stabilization Account.", "source": "NCSL", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=State%20Budget.%20Budget%20Stabilization%20Account.%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1242, "fingerprint": "2014|CA1220|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|CA1220|Statewide", "content_hash": "2d95bb2f9b61f705", "measure_id": "CA1220", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "State Budget. Budget Stabilization Account.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.69999695, "percent_no": 31.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure requires the state to deposit a portion of capital gains tax rev...", "summary_text": "This measure requires the state to deposit a portion of capital gains tax revenues into a budget stabilization account during strong economic periods and allows withdrawals from this account during budget emergencies or economic downturns. The measure also changes the minimum funding requirements for schools and community colleges and adjusts how education funding is calculated in relation to the state's general fund revenues.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(2014)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2014", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%202014", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1241, "fingerprint": "2014|CA1219|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|CA1219|Statewide", "content_hash": "273b3f3bb4529c68", "measure_id": "CA1219", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Water Bond. Funding for Water Quality, Supply, Treatment, and Storage Projects.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.80000305, "percent_no": 33.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized $7", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized $7.5 billion in general obligation bonds to fund various water infrastructure projects including water supply, quality, treatment, and storage facilities throughout California. The measure was approved by voters in 2014 to address the state's water needs through capital improvements and conservation projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(2014)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2014", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%202014", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1240, "fingerprint": "2014|CA1218|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|CA1218|Statewide", "content_hash": "27683a227f12e84e", "measure_id": "CA1218", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 41", "description": "Veterans Housing & Homeless Bond Act of 2014", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.40000153, "percent_no": 34.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $600 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $600 million in general obligation bonds to fund housing and supportive services for veterans, including those experiencing homelessness. The bonds would finance loans and grants for affordable rental housing, transitional housing, and related facilities specifically for veterans.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 41", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_41_(2014)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2014", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2041%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2041%202014", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1239, "fingerprint": "2014|CA1217|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|CA1217|Statewide", "content_hash": "f32e1339e22d4d7b", "measure_id": "CA1217", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 42", "description": "PUBLIC RECORDS. OPEN MEETINGS. STATE REIMBURSEMENT TO LOCAL AGENCIES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.79999924, "percent_no": 38.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment required local agencies to comply with public r...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment required local agencies to comply with public records and open meeting laws, and mandated that the state reimburse local governments for the costs of implementing these transparency requirements.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 42", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_42_(2014)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2014", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2042%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2042%202014", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1238, "fingerprint": "2014|CA1216|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|CA1216|Statewide", "content_hash": "e05f3d791b710d6c", "measure_id": "CA1216", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 47", "description": "Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.40000153, "percent_no": 41.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure reduced penalties for certain non-violent property and drug crim...", "summary_text": "This measure reduced penalties for certain non-violent property and drug crimes from felonies to misdemeanors, including theft of items valued under $950 and personal drug possession. It also allowed people previously convicted of these crimes as felonies to petition for resentencing under the new misdemeanor penalties.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 47", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_47_(2014)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2014", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2047%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2047%202014", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1237, "fingerprint": "2014|CA1215|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|CA1215|Statewide", "content_hash": "f57c73df639ba9c3", "measure_id": "CA1215", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 45", "description": "Approval of Healthcare Insurance Rate Changes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.20000076, "percent_no": 59.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required health insurance companies to obtain approva...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required health insurance companies to obtain approval from the state Insurance Commissioner before implementing rate increases, similar to existing requirements for other types of insurance. It would have given the Insurance Commissioner authority to reject proposed rate hikes deemed excessive or unreasonable.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 45", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_45_(2014)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2014", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2045%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2045%202014", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1236, "fingerprint": "2014|CA1214|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|CA1214|Statewide", "content_hash": "4788455c387f04aa", "measure_id": "CA1214", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 48", "description": "Referendum to Overturn Indian Gaming Compacts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.09999847, "percent_no": 60.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have overturned two tribal gaming compacts that the state ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have overturned two tribal gaming compacts that the state legislature approved, which allowed the North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians and the Waukau Miwuk Nation to build casinos in Madera County. A \"yes\" vote would have blocked these specific casino projects from moving forward.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 48", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_48_(2014)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2014", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2048%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2048%202014", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1235, "fingerprint": "2014|CA1213|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|CA1213|Statewide", "content_hash": "7397376d63c98b6a", "measure_id": "CA1213", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 46", "description": "Drug and Alcohol Testing of Doctors. Medical Negligence Lawsuits.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.79999924, "percent_no": 67.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have required doctors to submit to random drug and ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have required doctors to submit to random drug and alcohol testing and increased the cap on pain and suffering damages in medical malpractice lawsuits from $250,000 to $1.1 million. The measure failed with 32.8% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 46", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_46_(2014)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2014/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2014", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2046%202014", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2046%202014", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 5476, "fingerprint": "2014|201400029|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400029|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "c1e7a72b8893442e", "measure_id": "201400029", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Tehama County Board of Supervisors adopt a Declaration of Support for the proposed separation from the State of California and formation of a new state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7242, "no_votes": 5484, "total_votes": 12726, "percent_yes": 56.90711928335691, "percent_no": 43.09288071664309, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.962017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.935303", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Tehama County Board of Supervisors adopt a Declaration of Support for the proposed separation from the State of California and formation of a new state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5477, "fingerprint": "2014|201400030|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400030|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "62339a9e6d309a87", "measure_id": "201400030", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended to increase the salary of members of the Board of Supervisors to $3,795 per month effective January 1, 2015?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2873, "no_votes": 9757, "total_votes": 12630, "percent_yes": 22.74742676167854, "percent_no": 77.25257323832146, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.962344", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.935498", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended to increase the salary of members of the Board of Supervisors to $3,795 per month effective January 1, 2015?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5478, "fingerprint": "2014|201400031|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400031|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "c4e6caec85b3398c", "measure_id": "201400031", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended to provide that vacancies occurring on the Board of Supervisors shall be filled within ninety (90) days by the remaining members of the Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7327, "no_votes": 4956, "total_votes": 12283, "percent_yes": 59.651550924041366, "percent_no": 40.348449075958634, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.962647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.935690", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended to provide that vacancies occurring on the Board of Supervisors shall be filled within ninety (90) days by the remaining members of the Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5479, "fingerprint": "2014|201400303|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400303|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "2ba75efc55f59aab", "measure_id": "201400303", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support police and fire staffing, replace police and fire equipment, enhance recreation and parks, and for other general fund purposes, shall a quarter percent transactions and use tax (\u201csales tax\u201d) be adopted for a period of six years, subject to annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1500, "no_votes": 1066, "total_votes": 2566, "percent_yes": 58.45674201091192, "percent_no": 41.54325798908808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.962976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.935886", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support police and fire staffing, replace police and fire equipment, enhance recreation and parks, and for other general fund purposes, shall a quarter percent transactions and use tax (\u201csales tax\u201d) be adopted for a period of six years, subject to annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5480, "fingerprint": "2014|201400304|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400304|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "be67dbe9e9ba2418", "measure_id": "201400304", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the voters of the City of Red Bluff approve a transactions and use tax, should the City Council allocate 85% of proceeds of the new tax to the improvement of police and fire services and allocate the remainder to support parks, recreation and other general fund services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1528, "no_votes": 990, "total_votes": 2518, "percent_yes": 60.683081810961085, "percent_no": 39.316918189038915, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.963254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.936082", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the voters of the City of Red Bluff approve a transactions and use tax, should the City Council allocate 85% of proceeds of the new tax to the improvement of police and fire services and allocate the remainder to support parks, recreation and other general fund services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5481, "fingerprint": "2014|201400101|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400101|TULARE", "content_hash": "fabee3413e035329", "measure_id": "201400101", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Janet Hinesly be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember, City of Dinuba?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95, "no_votes": 104, "total_votes": 199, "percent_yes": 47.73869346733668, "percent_no": 52.26130653266332, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Recall", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.963584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.936275", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Janet Hinesly be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember, City of Dinuba?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5498, "fingerprint": "2014|201400460|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400460|TULARE", "content_hash": "e3904c898e8bfee9", "measure_id": "201400460", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; provide updated Career Technical education opportunities for job readiness; make health, safety/security improvements; increase student access to computers and modern technology; and construct a new pool at Farmersville High for school and community use; shall the Farmersville Unified School District issue $4,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 575, "no_votes": 296, "total_votes": 871, "percent_yes": 66.01607347876005, "percent_no": 33.98392652123995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.986761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.939789", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; provide updated Career Technical education opportunities for job readiness; make health, safety/security improvements; increase student access to computers and modern technology; and construct a new pool at Farmersville High for school and community use; shall the Farmersville Unified School District issue $4,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5499, "fingerprint": "2014|201400512|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400512|TULARE", "content_hash": "01dfea980357bd2f", "measure_id": "201400512", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct and improve school facilities, build permanent classrooms that alleviate overcrowding including a military institute and dual language immersion academy, replace outdated portables, complete necessary support facility improvements, furnish and equip new classrooms, shall the Porterville Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $67 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4930, "no_votes": 7864, "total_votes": 12794, "percent_yes": 38.53368766609348, "percent_no": 61.46631233390652, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.987196", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.939992", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct and improve school facilities, build permanent classrooms that alleviate overcrowding including a military institute and dual language immersion academy, replace outdated portables, complete necessary support facility improvements, furnish and equip new classrooms, shall the Porterville Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $67 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5500, "fingerprint": "2014|201400537|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400537|TULARE", "content_hash": "38f07b9912082c84", "measure_id": "201400537", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; increase student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and energy efficiency improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and construct a multipurpose room for school and community use; shall the Tipton Elementary School District issue $3,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 211, "no_votes": 142, "total_votes": 353, "percent_yes": 59.773371104815865, "percent_no": 40.226628895184135, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.987722", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.940191", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; increase student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and energy efficiency improvements; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and construct a multipurpose room for school and community use; shall the Tipton Elementary School District issue $3,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5497, "fingerprint": "2014|201400417|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400417|TULARE", "content_hash": "a76579ee572b7cad", "measure_id": "201400417", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; increase student access to computers and modern technology; modernize and upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Springville Union School District issue $4.0 million of bonds at legal rates, qualify the District for an additional $2.2 million in local State matching funds, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 724, "no_votes": 505, "total_votes": 1229, "percent_yes": 58.90968266883645, "percent_no": 41.09031733116355, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.986314", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.939598", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; increase student access to computers and modern technology; modernize and upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Springville Union School District issue $4.0 million of bonds at legal rates, qualify the District for an additional $2.2 million in local State matching funds, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5482, "fingerprint": "2014|201400114|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400114|TULARE", "content_hash": "4009ab70b565e398", "measure_id": "201400114", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to make certain technical, non-substantive revisions which do not materially alter, increase or decrease the home rule powers of the City of Porterville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1960, "no_votes": 1993, "total_votes": 3953, "percent_yes": 49.58259549709081, "percent_no": 50.41740450290919, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.963893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.936499", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to make certain technical, non-substantive revisions which do not materially alter, increase or decrease the home rule powers of the City of Porterville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5483, "fingerprint": "2014|201400115|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400115|TULARE", "content_hash": "eff2fa606f16c6ec", "measure_id": "201400115", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to change the election date for Council seats to be the same as the date for the Federal General election for federal officers in the State of California?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2636, "no_votes": 1464, "total_votes": 4100, "percent_yes": 64.29268292682927, "percent_no": 35.70731707317073, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.964160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.936691", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to change the election date for Council seats to be the same as the date for the Federal General election for federal officers in the State of California?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5484, "fingerprint": "2014|201400116|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400116|TULARE", "content_hash": "567fa1f8d7f7668c", "measure_id": "201400116", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to allow City Council meetings to be held at publicly-owned facilities in addition to City Hall?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2299, "no_votes": 1852, "total_votes": 4151, "percent_yes": 55.38424476029873, "percent_no": 44.61575523970127, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.964425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.936880", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to allow City Council meetings to be held at publicly-owned facilities in addition to City Hall?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5485, "fingerprint": "2014|201400117|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400117|TULARE", "content_hash": "03649f27aff02fee", "measure_id": "201400117", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that a council member seat becomes vacant if, without permission from the Council, a council member removes or absents himself/herself from the City for more than forty-five (45) days, fails to attend five (5) consecutive regular meetings, unless prevented from attending by sickness, and in that event after ninety (90) days?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2849, "no_votes": 1265, "total_votes": 4114, "percent_yes": 69.25133689839572, "percent_no": 30.74866310160428, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.964729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.937069", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that a council member seat becomes vacant if, without permission from the Council, a council member removes or absents himself/herself from the City for more than forty-five (45) days, fails to attend five (5) consecutive regular meetings, unless prevented from attending by sickness, and in that event after ninety (90) days?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5486, "fingerprint": "2014|201400118|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400118|TULARE", "content_hash": "df8705c220342354", "measure_id": "201400118", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that any severance pay to the City Manager is limited to the equivalent of a maximum of 12 months salary, subject to any other restrictions set forth by State law and further limitations as authorized by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2810, "no_votes": 1260, "total_votes": 4070, "percent_yes": 69.04176904176904, "percent_no": 30.958230958230956, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.965029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.937259", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that any severance pay to the City Manager is limited to the equivalent of a maximum of 12 months salary, subject to any other restrictions set forth by State law and further limitations as authorized by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5487, "fingerprint": "2014|201400119|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400119|TULARE", "content_hash": "3dcdfe9a198e8942", "measure_id": "201400119", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to require majority vote approval of expenditures, allow the City Council to set, by majority vote and resolution after each Council election, the maximum amount of expenditure of City funds allowed without prior Council approval; require a 4/5 majority vote approval for indebtedness, and allow the Council to set, by 4/5 majority vote and resolution after each Council election, the maximum amount of indebtedness allowed without prior Council approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2158, "no_votes": 1853, "total_votes": 4011, "percent_yes": 53.80204437796061, "percent_no": 46.19795562203939, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.965406", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.937451", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to require majority vote approval of expenditures, allow the City Council to set, by majority vote and resolution after each Council election, the maximum amount of expenditure of City funds allowed without prior Council approval; require a 4/5 majority vote approval for indebtedness, and allow the Council to set, by 4/5 majority vote and resolution after each Council election, the maximum amount of indebtedness allowed without prior Council approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5488, "fingerprint": "2014|201400120|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400120|TULARE", "content_hash": "159badd3fd2836de", "measure_id": "201400120", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that the City has the power to perform public projects, improvements, and repairs using its own forces, regardless of cost, and to provide that the City Council may, only in cases of emergency including circumstances resulting in imminent threat to public health and/or safety, by 4/5 majority vote, proceed without otherwise adhering to competitive bidding requirements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1612, "no_votes": 2447, "total_votes": 4059, "percent_yes": 39.714215323971416, "percent_no": 60.285784676028584, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.965709", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.937646", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that the City has the power to perform public projects, improvements, and repairs using its own forces, regardless of cost, and to provide that the City Council may, only in cases of emergency including circumstances resulting in imminent threat to public health and/or safety, by 4/5 majority vote, proceed without otherwise adhering to competitive bidding requirements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5489, "fingerprint": "2014|201400121|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400121|TULARE", "content_hash": "b1654c094baafba4", "measure_id": "201400121", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to raise the bid limit to $50,000.00, concerning public projects subject to competitive bidding, with further restrictions considered by the Council annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1738, "no_votes": 2277, "total_votes": 4015, "percent_yes": 43.28767123287671, "percent_no": 56.71232876712329, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.966039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.937841", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to raise the bid limit to $50,000.00, concerning public projects subject to competitive bidding, with further restrictions considered by the Council annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5490, "fingerprint": "2014|201400122|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400122|TULARE", "content_hash": "c70e0d60a5e223aa", "measure_id": "201400122", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that a violation of this section (interference with the performance of duties of the City Manager) is a misdemeanor and subject to additional consequences, including forfeiture of office if convicted, and that the portion of this Charter section pertaining to officer and employee political activities be moved to and restated in a new Charter section?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2247, "no_votes": 1673, "total_votes": 3920, "percent_yes": 57.32142857142857, "percent_no": 42.67857142857143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.966305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.938029", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that a violation of this section (interference with the performance of duties of the City Manager) is a misdemeanor and subject to additional consequences, including forfeiture of office if convicted, and that the portion of this Charter section pertaining to officer and employee political activities be moved to and restated in a new Charter section?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5491, "fingerprint": "2014|201400123|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400123|TULARE", "content_hash": "9d249e2669aeda52", "measure_id": "201400123", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to require that leases of City property may be terminated by the City upon advance notice equivalent to either 30 days or a maximum of 5% of the total lease term period but not including option periods, and upon paying the lessee market value of improvements as set forth, and clarifying that these requirements shall not apply to month-to-month, or State or Federal, leases?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1937, "no_votes": 1980, "total_votes": 3917, "percent_yes": 49.4511105437835, "percent_no": 50.5488894562165, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.966574", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.938226", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to require that leases of City property may be terminated by the City upon advance notice equivalent to either 30 days or a maximum of 5% of the total lease term period but not including option periods, and upon paying the lessee market value of improvements as set forth, and clarifying that these requirements shall not apply to month-to-month, or State or Federal, leases?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5492, "fingerprint": "2014|201400124|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400124|TULARE", "content_hash": "901599b0d5031673", "measure_id": "201400124", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to add a new Charter section establishing penalties and remedies for violations of the Charter, where no other penalty or remedy is otherwise specified, and providing for penalties and remedies as generally provided for in the City\u2019s Municipal Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2094, "no_votes": 1819, "total_votes": 3913, "percent_yes": 53.51392793253258, "percent_no": 46.48607206746742, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.966889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.938419", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to add a new Charter section establishing penalties and remedies for violations of the Charter, where no other penalty or remedy is otherwise specified, and providing for penalties and remedies as generally provided for in the City\u2019s Municipal Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5493, "fingerprint": "2014|201400125|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400125|TULARE", "content_hash": "01618f3a753bc119", "measure_id": "201400125", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that council members shall receive compensation equivalent to the hourly California State Minimum Wage, as from time-to-time may be adjusted by State law and then by ordinance, for all meetings attended by the members as approved by the City Council, with compensation only becoming effective upon commencement of each council-member\u2019s new term and subject to any other applicable statutory or constitutional restrictions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1577, "no_votes": 2413, "total_votes": 3990, "percent_yes": 39.523809523809526, "percent_no": 60.476190476190474, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.967164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.938625", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that council members shall receive compensation equivalent to the hourly California State Minimum Wage, as from time-to-time may be adjusted by State law and then by ordinance, for all meetings attended by the members as approved by the City Council, with compensation only becoming effective upon commencement of each council-member\u2019s new term and subject to any other applicable statutory or constitutional restrictions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5494, "fingerprint": "2014|201400126|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400126|TULARE", "content_hash": "86b7820484d8b922", "measure_id": "201400126", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that the ordinance publication requirements shall be set by City ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2090, "no_votes": 1781, "total_votes": 3871, "percent_yes": 53.991216739860505, "percent_no": 46.008783260139495, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.967430", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.938825", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that the ordinance publication requirements shall be set by City ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5495, "fingerprint": "2014|201400127|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400127|TULARE", "content_hash": "80cdfc7f37308298", "measure_id": "201400127", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that the City employee retirement, pension, or disability/death benefits shall not be terminated except as may be permitted by the California Constitution and applicable law, and to clarify that the City retains its full power to create, modify or eliminate its pensions and retiree healthcare benefits subject to the California Constitution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2164, "no_votes": 1855, "total_votes": 4019, "percent_yes": 53.84423986066186, "percent_no": 46.15576013933814, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.967764", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.939017", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to provide that the City employee retirement, pension, or disability/death benefits shall not be terminated except as may be permitted by the California Constitution and applicable law, and to clarify that the City retains its full power to create, modify or eliminate its pensions and retiree healthcare benefits subject to the California Constitution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5496, "fingerprint": "2014|201400408|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400408|TULARE", "content_hash": "d88c5dbdc7aef766", "measure_id": "201400408", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for Pixley students, modernize aging classrooms and construct necessary student support facilities for school and community use, improve health and safety, and increase access to classroom technology, shall the Pixley Union School District be authorized to issue up to $7.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, with Citizens' Oversight with no money for administration or salaries, and qualify the District for over $5.4 million in State matching grants?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 229, "no_votes": 69, "total_votes": 298, "percent_yes": 76.84563758389261, "percent_no": 23.15436241610739, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.985647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.939404", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for Pixley students, modernize aging classrooms and construct necessary student support facilities for school and community use, improve health and safety, and increase access to classroom technology, shall the Pixley Union School District be authorized to issue up to $7.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, with Citizens' Oversight with no money for administration or salaries, and qualify the District for over $5.4 million in State matching grants?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5502, "fingerprint": "2014|201400280|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400280|VENTURA", "content_hash": "cda7222ce65188eb", "measure_id": "201400280", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city councilmembers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1710, "no_votes": 847, "total_votes": 2557, "percent_yes": 66.87524442706297, "percent_no": 33.12475557293703, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.988614", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.940584", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city councilmembers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5503, "fingerprint": "2014|201400281|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400281|VENTURA", "content_hash": "51bc78433c3b3a90", "measure_id": "201400281", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1674, "no_votes": 769, "total_votes": 2443, "percent_yes": 68.52230863692182, "percent_no": 31.47769136307818, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.989030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.940773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5504, "fingerprint": "2014|201400282|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400282|VENTURA", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "201400282", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 604, "no_votes": 1697, "total_votes": 2301, "percent_yes": 26.249456757931327, "percent_no": 73.75054324206867, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.989447", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.940969", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5505, "fingerprint": "2014|201400322|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400322|VENTURA", "content_hash": "a8c5018c24b1a5ce", "measure_id": "201400322", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 500 of the City Charter be amended to provide for regular City elections in November of even-numbered years instead of odd-numbered years to increase voter turnout and decrease election costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25610, "no_votes": 5391, "total_votes": 31001, "percent_yes": 82.61023837940712, "percent_no": 17.38976162059288, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.990053", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.941159", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 500 of the City Charter be amended to provide for regular City elections in November of even-numbered years instead of odd-numbered years to increase voter turnout and decrease election costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5506, "fingerprint": "2014|201400323|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400323|VENTURA", "content_hash": "bc3f1b25816bd0be", "measure_id": "201400323", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the General Municipal Election is changed to even years, shall members of the Board of Education of the Ventura Unified School District be elected at the City of San Buenaventura's General Municipal Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25172, "no_votes": 5092, "total_votes": 30264, "percent_yes": 83.17472905101772, "percent_no": 16.82527094898228, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.990378", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.941352", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the General Municipal Election is changed to even years, shall members of the Board of Education of the Ventura Unified School District be elected at the City of San Buenaventura's General Municipal Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5507, "fingerprint": "2014|201400340|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400340|VENTURA", "content_hash": "50bbf7c69be30afb", "measure_id": "201400340", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a one percent (1.0%) transactions and use (sales) tax to fund police services, fire services and street repair and maintenance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2931, "no_votes": 2152, "total_votes": 5083, "percent_yes": 57.66279756049577, "percent_no": 42.33720243950423, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.990656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.941548", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a one percent (1.0%) transactions and use (sales) tax to fund police services, fire services and street repair and maintenance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5512, "fingerprint": "2014|201400514|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400514|VENTURA", "content_hash": "4fcdf3c7dbe4c8ed", "measure_id": "201400514", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms and facilities; make health and safety improvements; improve student access to computers and technology; construct new classrooms and new school facilities to reduce severe student overcrowding; and upgrade inadequate electrical and plumbing systems; shall the Rio Elementary School District issue $38,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3753, "no_votes": 1538, "total_votes": 5291, "percent_yes": 70.93177093177093, "percent_no": 29.068229068229073, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.992188", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.942514", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms and facilities; make health and safety improvements; improve student access to computers and technology; construct new classrooms and new school facilities to reduce severe student overcrowding; and upgrade inadequate electrical and plumbing systems; shall the Rio Elementary School District issue $38,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5501, "fingerprint": "2014|201400214|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400214|VENTURA", "content_hash": "38973571fbf6c2a0", "measure_id": "201400214", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Effective after the November 2016 general municipal election and the beginning of a new term of office of at least one member of the City Council, shall the 1966 ballot measure and Ordinance 346 setting the salary for each member of the City Council of the City of Fillmore at the sum of $75 per month be rescinded, thereafter allowing the City Council salary to be set as authorized by State law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1255, "no_votes": 1206, "total_votes": 2461, "percent_yes": 50.99553027224706, "percent_no": 49.00446972775294, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:31", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.988179", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.940390", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Effective after the November 2016 general municipal election and the beginning of a new term of office of at least one member of the City Council, shall the 1966 ballot measure and Ordinance 346 setting the salary for each member of the City Council of the City of Fillmore at the sum of $75 per month be rescinded, thereafter allowing the City Council salary to be set as authorized by State law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5510, "fingerprint": "2014|201400448|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400448|VENTURA", "content_hash": "47b536b5dcfd226a", "measure_id": "201400448", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade/maintain Conejo Valley schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Conejo Valley Unified School District upgrade all science/career training labs, update/maintain classroom technology and network infrastructure, provide safe, well maintained classrooms, repair/replace electrical, plumbing/roofing, repair, construct, acquire/equip sites/facilities, and improve school safety/security by issuing $197 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27468, "no_votes": 14184, "total_votes": 41652, "percent_yes": 65.94641313742437, "percent_no": 34.05358686257563, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.991628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.942125", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade/maintain Conejo Valley schools with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Conejo Valley Unified School District upgrade all science/career training labs, update/maintain classroom technology and network infrastructure, provide safe, well maintained classrooms, repair/replace electrical, plumbing/roofing, repair, construct, acquire/equip sites/facilities, and improve school safety/security by issuing $197 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators, and without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5511, "fingerprint": "2014|201400506|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400506|VENTURA", "content_hash": "7954f53232b7c5e1", "measure_id": "201400506", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; renovate/ upgrade classrooms and facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate/outdated plumbing, electrical, and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, make health, safety, and security improvements including fire alarms, and improve student access to computers/ modern technology, shall Ojai Unified School District issue $35,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, appoint an independent citizen's oversight committee, and have no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5223, "no_votes": 2432, "total_votes": 7655, "percent_yes": 68.22991508817766, "percent_no": 31.770084911822337, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.991920", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.942320", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; renovate/ upgrade classrooms and facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate/outdated plumbing, electrical, and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, make health, safety, and security improvements including fire alarms, and improve student access to computers/ modern technology, shall Ojai Unified School District issue $35,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, appoint an independent citizen's oversight committee, and have no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5509, "fingerprint": "2014|201400438|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400438|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e82a5189bbc3e73b", "measure_id": "201400438", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; provide new classrooms to reduce student overcrowding; make safety and security improvements; construct a new kitchen to provide healthy meals; replace outdated fire alarms; upgrade nearly 100-year-old windows; and improve student access to computers and technology; shall Briggs Elementary School District issue $4,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 398, "no_votes": 189, "total_votes": 587, "percent_yes": 67.80238500851789, "percent_no": 32.19761499148211, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.991207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.941932", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; provide new classrooms to reduce student overcrowding; make safety and security improvements; construct a new kitchen to provide healthy meals; replace outdated fire alarms; upgrade nearly 100-year-old windows; and improve student access to computers and technology; shall Briggs Elementary School District issue $4,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5508, "fingerprint": "2014|201400367|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400367|VENTURA", "content_hash": "2bda3a84484a5877", "measure_id": "201400367", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to eliminate taxes on home-based businesses to promote small business growth, and increase and/or impose new taxes on other businesses for purpose of paying for general city services, such as public safety, street maintenance, beach and park maintenance and improvements, recreation programs, health and wellness programs for seniors and children, and other important community projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1699, "no_votes": 2133, "total_votes": 3832, "percent_yes": 44.33716075156576, "percent_no": 55.66283924843424, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.990935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.941741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to eliminate taxes on home-based businesses to promote small business growth, and increase and/or impose new taxes on other businesses for purpose of paying for general city services, such as public safety, street maintenance, beach and park maintenance and improvements, recreation programs, health and wellness programs for seniors and children, and other important community projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5516, "fingerprint": "2014|201400142|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400142|YOLO", "content_hash": "d84706aeaf4328dd", "measure_id": "201400142", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1558 which would authorize the City of Woodland to continue to collect a one-quarter cent sales tax for general city\r\nservices, for a period of eight years, and would not increase taxes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5450, "no_votes": 2500, "total_votes": 7950, "percent_yes": 68.55345911949685, "percent_no": 31.44654088050315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.993363", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.943283", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1558 which would authorize the City of Woodland to continue to collect a one-quarter cent sales tax for general city\r\nservices, for a period of eight years, and would not increase taxes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5517, "fingerprint": "2014|201400143|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400143|YOLO", "content_hash": "7fb27c2399aacffd", "measure_id": "201400143", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 60% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City\r\nof Woodland via the June 2014 ballot to expand and enhance youth and teen programs and facilities, including funding to support the re-opening of Hiddleson Pool, and reduction of fees charged for youth programs and use of city recreation facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5047, "no_votes": 2662, "total_votes": 7709, "percent_yes": 65.46893241665586, "percent_no": 34.53106758334414, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.993632", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.943474", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 60% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City\r\nof Woodland via the June 2014 ballot to expand and enhance youth and teen programs and facilities, including funding to support the re-opening of Hiddleson Pool, and reduction of fees charged for youth programs and use of city recreation facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5518, "fingerprint": "2014|201400144|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400144|YOLO", "content_hash": "4799eaa8493dc513", "measure_id": "201400144", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 20% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the June 2014 ballot to the Woodland Public Library to enhance educational and youth literacy programs and expand hours of operation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5082, "no_votes": 2573, "total_votes": 7655, "percent_yes": 66.3879817112998, "percent_no": 33.6120182887002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.993903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.943665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 20% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the June 2014 ballot to the Woodland Public Library to enhance educational and youth literacy programs and expand hours of operation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5519, "fingerprint": "2014|201400145|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400145|YOLO", "content_hash": "6e672d547351f62a", "measure_id": "201400145", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 15% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the June 2014 ballot to enhance public safety through expanded crime prevention programs such as Neighborhood Watch and services supporting at-risk youth including gang intervention strategies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5378, "no_votes": 2294, "total_votes": 7672, "percent_yes": 70.09906152241918, "percent_no": 29.900938477580823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.994167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.943854", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council allocate 15% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the June 2014 ballot to enhance public safety through expanded crime prevention programs such as Neighborhood Watch and services supporting at-risk youth including gang intervention strategies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5520, "fingerprint": "2014|201400146|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400146|YOLO", "content_hash": "3ea9a0dd9296f4a7", "measure_id": "201400146", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)Shall the City Council allocate up to 5% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the June 2014 ballot to support a city water and sewer utility ratepayer assistance program for low-income residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4084, "no_votes": 3533, "total_votes": 7617, "percent_yes": 53.61690954444007, "percent_no": 46.38309045555993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.994467", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.944043", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)Shall the City Council allocate up to 5% of the tax revenue collected from any sales tax measure re-authorized in the City of Woodland via the June 2014 ballot to support a city water and sewer utility ratepayer assistance program for low-income residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5513, "fingerprint": "2014|201400098|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400098|YOLO", "content_hash": "7956dc406eee6063", "measure_id": "201400098", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2432, which would authorize the City of Davis to continue to collect a sales and use tax for general government purposes at the total rate of one percent through December 31, 2020, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8316, "no_votes": 5810, "total_votes": 14126, "percent_yes": 58.87016848364718, "percent_no": 41.12983151635282, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.992457", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.942705", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2432, which would authorize the City of Davis to continue to collect a sales and use tax for general government purposes at the total rate of one percent through December 31, 2020, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5514, "fingerprint": "2014|201400099|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400099|YOLO", "content_hash": "51f095fc0b01fd9f", "measure_id": "201400099", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2405, which adopted increased water rates, and putting water rates in effect prior to May 1, 2013 back into effect, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7058, "no_votes": 6771, "total_votes": 13829, "percent_yes": 51.03767445223804, "percent_no": 48.96232554776196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.992766", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.942900", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2405, which adopted increased water rates, and putting water rates in effect prior to May 1, 2013 back into effect, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5515, "fingerprint": "2014|201400141|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400141|YOLO", "content_hash": "d08bc65bf5abd4e0", "measure_id": "201400141", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Hotel Tax (The Transient Occupancy Tax imposed on those staying in hotels in Winters) be increased from 10% to 12%, by voter approval of City of Winters Ordinance 2014-02. adopted by the City Council and effective upon the passage of this Measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 619, "no_votes": 427, "total_votes": 1046, "percent_yes": 59.17782026768642, "percent_no": 40.82217973231358, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-06-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.993093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.943090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Hotel Tax (The Transient Occupancy Tax imposed on those staying in hotels in Winters) be increased from 10% to 12%, by voter approval of City of Winters Ordinance 2014-02. adopted by the City Council and effective upon the passage of this Measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5521, "fingerprint": "2014|201400361|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400361|YOLO", "content_hash": "ea7fa4f90911f6dc", "measure_id": "201400361", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1561 adding article II of chapter 27 to the Woodland Municipal Code, related to Council elections, be adopted, establishing \"by-district\" elections whereby voters would elect Council members from among candidates who live in their respective district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7304, "no_votes": 3439, "total_votes": 10743, "percent_yes": 67.98845760029786, "percent_no": 32.01154239970214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:07.994739", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.944232", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1561 adding article II of chapter 27 to the Woodland Municipal Code, related to Council elections, be adopted, establishing \"by-district\" elections whereby voters would elect Council members from among candidates who live in their respective district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5522, "fingerprint": "2014|201400543|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400543|YOLO", "content_hash": "3bb45c3edeeb3764", "measure_id": "201400543", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education locally with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Washington Unified School District reconstruct, renovate and repair aging elementary school classrooms and other school facilities, remove dry rot/mold and replace leaking roofs/windows, make classrooms accessible for disabled students; and provide up-to-date classrooms, science/computer labs, career technology education facilities by issuing $49.8 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, with no money for administrators and with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6118, "no_votes": 2954, "total_votes": 9072, "percent_yes": 67.43827160493827, "percent_no": 32.561728395061735, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.015483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.944619", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education locally with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Washington Unified School District reconstruct, renovate and repair aging elementary school classrooms and other school facilities, remove dry rot/mold and replace leaking roofs/windows, make classrooms accessible for disabled students; and provide up-to-date classrooms, science/computer labs, career technology education facilities by issuing $49.8 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, with no money for administrators and with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5523, "fingerprint": "2014|201400365|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400365|YUBA", "content_hash": "72ff8f4b7b21aa4b", "measure_id": "201400365", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Marysville enact a one-cent sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for general government purposes, such as: public safety, community infrastructure and debt service, with the following mandatory restrictions? [This sales tax will expire after ten years on March 31, 2025.][The citizens shall receive annually a published report of revenue and disbursements, following a public hearing.]", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 955, "no_votes": 1030, "total_votes": 1985, "percent_yes": 48.11083123425693, "percent_no": 51.88916876574307, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.056552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.945204", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Marysville enact a one-cent sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for general government purposes, such as: public safety, community infrastructure and debt service, with the following mandatory restrictions? [This sales tax will expire after ten years on March 31, 2025.][The citizens shall receive annually a published report of revenue and disbursements, following a public hearing.]", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5524, "fingerprint": "2014|201400366|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2014|201400366|YUBA", "content_hash": "16889c278cd72094", "measure_id": "201400366", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2014, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure W is approved, should the proceeds fund fire and police protection, traffic safety, street and sidewalk repair, park maintenance and debt service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1446, "no_votes": 429, "total_votes": 1875, "percent_yes": 77.12, "percent_no": 22.879999999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2014-11-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.056911", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.945396", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure W is approved, should the proceeds fund fire and police protection, traffic safety, street and sidewalk repair, park maintenance and debt service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5525, "fingerprint": "2013|201300103|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300103|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a5433e5e3b530ce9", "measure_id": "201300103", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent local school funding from expiring and to maintain the quality of Piedmont's schools, to attract, train and retain qualified teachers, to protect programs in math, science and technology, to continue funding for music, visual and performing arts programs, and to keep textbooks and instructional technology up-to-date, shall the Piedmont Unified School District continue to levy a special tax as specified in the voter pamphlet, with all funds staying in Piedmont to benefit our schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3414, "no_votes": 1049, "total_votes": 4463, "percent_yes": 76.5, "percent_no": 23.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.057246", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.945587", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent local school funding from expiring and to maintain the quality of Piedmont's schools, to attract, train and retain qualified teachers, to protect programs in math, science and technology, to continue funding for music, visual and performing arts programs, and to keep textbooks and instructional technology up-to-date, shall the Piedmont Unified School District continue to levy a special tax as specified in the voter pamphlet, with all funds staying in Piedmont to benefit our schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5526, "fingerprint": "2013|201300013|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300013|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d818524ce9ecb5e8", "measure_id": "201300013", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To restore Hercules to financial stability, enhance fiscal accountability, continue to maintain our own local Police Department, and prevent drastic cuts to neighborhood police officers, youth/senior programs, and other services, shall Hercules modernize its utility users tax with equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology, increase the rate by 2% for 5 years, maintain current low-income exemptions, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, and local control of revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2248, "no_votes": 920, "total_votes": 3168, "percent_yes": 71.0, "percent_no": 29.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.057659", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.945786", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore Hercules to financial stability, enhance fiscal accountability, continue to maintain our own local Police Department, and prevent drastic cuts to neighborhood police officers, youth/senior programs, and other services, shall Hercules modernize its utility users tax with equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology, increase the rate by 2% for 5 years, maintain current low-income exemptions, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, and local control of revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5530, "fingerprint": "2013|201300104|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300104|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "11247c71c894a80c", "measure_id": "201300104", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the high quality of Moraga schools and continue funding for effective math, science, music and arts programs; maintain manageable class sizes; keep schools safe and well maintained; keep school libraries open; keep classroom technology up-to-date; and attract and retain the best qualified teachers; shall the Moraga School District levy a temporary six-year $192 parcel tax with an exemption for low-income seniors, independent audits, and with all funds staying local to benefit Moraga students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3969, "no_votes": 1837, "total_votes": 5806, "percent_yes": 68.4, "percent_no": 31.599999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.059057", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.946577", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the high quality of Moraga schools and continue funding for effective math, science, music and arts programs; maintain manageable class sizes; keep schools safe and well maintained; keep school libraries open; keep classroom technology up-to-date; and attract and retain the best qualified teachers; shall the Moraga School District levy a temporary six-year $192 parcel tax with an exemption for low-income seniors, independent audits, and with all funds staying local to benefit Moraga students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5527, "fingerprint": "2013|201300014|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300014|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "9aa07f6a64cb7c23", "measure_id": "201300014", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund all essential city services including increased police staffing to reduce crime and gang activities and improve 911 emergency response time; restored code enforcement to clean up blighted properties; and local economic development and job creation, shall the City of Antioch adopt a one-half cent transactions and use (sales) tax, expiring in seven years, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizens\u2019 oversight and for local Antioch use only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7609, "no_votes": 3566, "total_votes": 11175, "percent_yes": 68.10000000000001, "percent_no": 31.89999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.058097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.945992", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund all essential city services including increased police staffing to reduce crime and gang activities and improve 911 emergency response time; restored code enforcement to clean up blighted properties; and local economic development and job creation, shall the City of Antioch adopt a one-half cent transactions and use (sales) tax, expiring in seven years, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizens\u2019 oversight and for local Antioch use only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5528, "fingerprint": "2013|201300015|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300015|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3e6bb1766c0827e3", "measure_id": "201300015", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by the people to amend the City Municipal Code to change the general municipal election date from November of odd-numbered years to November of even-numbered years and to extend the terms of the Mayor and all City Council members by one year to make that change? (Saves approximately $142,000 per election.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6737, "no_votes": 1371, "total_votes": 8108, "percent_yes": 83.1, "percent_no": 16.900000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.058407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.946192", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by the people to amend the City Municipal Code to change the general municipal election date from November of odd-numbered years to November of even-numbered years and to extend the terms of the Mayor and all City Council members by one year to make that change? (Saves approximately $142,000 per election.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5529, "fingerprint": "2013|201300016|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300016|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2068d5e5a3639a1d", "measure_id": "201300016", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article III of the City of San Ramon Charter be amended to: a) change the mayoral election date from odd-numbered years to the date of the statewide general election during even-numbered years; and b) extend by one year the term of the Mayor elected in 2013 to accommodate the election date change; and c) extend the cumulative total number of years the mayor elected in 2013 may serve from eight to nine years? (Saves approximately $142,000 per election.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6578, "no_votes": 1508, "total_votes": 8086, "percent_yes": 81.39999999999999, "percent_no": 18.60000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.058689", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.946384", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article III of the City of San Ramon Charter be amended to: a) change the mayoral election date from odd-numbered years to the date of the statewide general election during even-numbered years; and b) extend by one year the term of the Mayor elected in 2013 to accommodate the election date change; and c) extend the cumulative total number of years the mayor elected in 2013 may serve from eight to nine years? (Saves approximately $142,000 per election.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5531, "fingerprint": "2013|201300001|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300001|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "decf8e7efa802d0b", "measure_id": "201300001", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax in an amount of $270.00 on each improved parcel of real property and in an amount of $120.00 on each unimproved parcel of real property be levied within Gilmore Vista Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2013/2014 to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services, to replace the current benefit assessment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 31, "percent_yes": 61.3, "percent_no": 38.7, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.059390", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.946773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax in an amount of $270.00 on each improved parcel of real property and in an amount of $120.00 on each unimproved parcel of real property be levied within Gilmore Vista Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2013/2014 to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services, to replace the current benefit assessment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5532, "fingerprint": "2013|201300002|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300002|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "18ea941acc86ecf6", "measure_id": "201300002", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax in an amount of $350.00 on each parcel of real property be levied within Meadowview Acres Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2013/2014 to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services, to replace the current benefit assessment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63, "no_votes": 7, "total_votes": 70, "percent_yes": 90.0, "percent_no": 10.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.059837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.946963", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax in an amount of $350.00 on each parcel of real property be levied within Meadowview Acres Zone of Benefit commencing fiscal year 2013/2014 to be used only for road improvement and maintenance services, to replace the current benefit assessment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5534, "fingerprint": "2013|201300018|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300018|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3ec506d50cbd630d", "measure_id": "201300018", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 13-01 be adopted to lower the commercial rate for utility users tax from 10% to 7.5% immediately, lower the residential rate to 7.5% effective July 1, 2019, allow the City Council the ability to further lower the commercial rate on or after July 1, 2019 upon making certain findings, and to remove the cap on City utility users taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 431, "no_votes": 139, "total_votes": 570, "percent_yes": 75.6, "percent_no": 24.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-07-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.060465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.947346", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 13-01 be adopted to lower the commercial rate for utility users tax from 10% to 7.5% immediately, lower the residential rate to 7.5% effective July 1, 2019, allow the City Council the ability to further lower the commercial rate on or after July 1, 2019 upon making certain findings, and to remove the cap on City utility users taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5535, "fingerprint": "2013|201300019|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300019|FRESNO", "content_hash": "413cb7713fc5799c", "measure_id": "201300019", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City's Utility Users Tax in order to impose a 5% utility users tax on new telecommunication technologies such as wireless and voice over internet services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 235, "no_votes": 342, "total_votes": 577, "percent_yes": 40.7, "percent_no": 59.3, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-07-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.060770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.947573", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City's Utility Users Tax in order to impose a 5% utility users tax on new telecommunication technologies such as wireless and voice over internet services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5533, "fingerprint": "2013|201300017|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300017|FRESNO", "content_hash": "83ed8ef1f910f8f7", "measure_id": "201300017", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2012-26 which grants to Mid Valley Disposal an exclusive franchise for the collection of residential solid waste, recyclable materials, and organic materials within the City of Fresno be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29039, "no_votes": 29901, "total_votes": 58940, "percent_yes": 49.3, "percent_no": 50.7, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Solid Waste", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.060130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.947155", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2012-26 which grants to Mid Valley Disposal an exclusive franchise for the collection of residential solid waste, recyclable materials, and organic materials within the City of Fresno be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5537, "fingerprint": "2013|201300021|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300021|FRESNO", "content_hash": "107f5bc2f1d050ba", "measure_id": "201300021", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Selma increase the existing transient occupancy tax for the privilege of occupancy in any room, hotel, inn, motel or other lodging, for occupancy? for a period of less than 30 days, from 6% to 12% of the rent charged by the operator of such lodging?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 595, "no_votes": 591, "total_votes": 1186, "percent_yes": 50.2, "percent_no": 49.8, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.061341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.947965", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Selma increase the existing transient occupancy tax for the privilege of occupancy in any room, hotel, inn, motel or other lodging, for occupancy? for a period of less than 30 days, from 6% to 12% of the rent charged by the operator of such lodging?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5536, "fingerprint": "2013|201300020|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300020|FRESNO", "content_hash": "5793627ef569b1b2", "measure_id": "201300020", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To hire additional police officers for crime suppression and prevention, increased police patrols to protect neighborhoods, schools and parks and to purchase necessary related equipment or facilities to expand police protection services, shall the City of Huron enact a One Cent ($0.01) sales taxes requiring that revenues receive from such sales tax be used exclusively for public safety purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 109, "no_votes": 47, "total_votes": 156, "percent_yes": 69.89999999999999, "percent_no": 30.10000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.061039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.947778", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To hire additional police officers for crime suppression and prevention, increased police patrols to protect neighborhoods, schools and parks and to purchase necessary related equipment or facilities to expand police protection services, shall the City of Huron enact a One Cent ($0.01) sales taxes requiring that revenues receive from such sales tax be used exclusively for public safety purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5538, "fingerprint": "2013|201300003|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300003|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "8696ddfd87c73776", "measure_id": "201300003", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special tax be levied for fire protection, emergency medical services and an expansion of the fire house by the Fieldbrook Glendale Community Services District of $75.00 per assessor's parcel in Zone Two (2) in the District, such tax to continue for ten (10) years? If passed the special tax will supersede and replace the existing assessment.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 296, "no_votes": 49, "total_votes": 345, "percent_yes": 85.8, "percent_no": 14.200000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.061609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.948147", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax be levied for fire protection, emergency medical services and an expansion of the fire house by the Fieldbrook Glendale Community Services District of $75.00 per assessor's parcel in Zone Two (2) in the District, such tax to continue for ten (10) years? If passed the special tax will supersede and replace the existing assessment.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5539, "fingerprint": "2013|201300105|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300105|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "39c31a1e696831bc", "measure_id": "201300105", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, modernize vocational classrooms, ensure local students have access to classroom and facilities comparable to neighboring schools, modernize Wirt Auditorium and Hornet Gymnasium (Old Gym), improve student support facilities, provide the required match to access up to $4.4 million in State grants, shall Calipatria Unified School District be authorized to issue $9.0 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, independent Citizens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 422, "no_votes": 283, "total_votes": 705, "percent_yes": 59.9, "percent_no": 40.1, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education: Bonds", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.061929", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.948327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, modernize vocational classrooms, ensure local students have access to classroom and facilities comparable to neighboring schools, modernize Wirt Auditorium and Hornet Gymnasium (Old Gym), improve student support facilities, provide the required match to access up to $4.4 million in State grants, shall Calipatria Unified School District be authorized to issue $9.0 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, independent Citizens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5541, "fingerprint": "2013|201300106|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300106|KERN", "content_hash": "d7cb1445fc239ebc", "measure_id": "201300106", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall there be formed a unified school district on the boundaries of the Wasco High School District, with the entire territory of the high school district included for high school purposes, so that the Wasco High School District and Wasco Elementary School District will be unified for all purposes while the Lost Hills, Maple and Semitropic Elementary School Districts shall retain their independence and separate identity for elementary school purposes as authorized by Education Code section 35542(b)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 466, "no_votes": 930, "total_votes": 1396, "percent_yes": 33.4, "percent_no": 66.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.062633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.948702", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be formed a unified school district on the boundaries of the Wasco High School District, with the entire territory of the high school district included for high school purposes, so that the Wasco High School District and Wasco Elementary School District will be unified for all purposes while the Lost Hills, Maple and Semitropic Elementary School Districts shall retain their independence and separate identity for elementary school purposes as authorized by Education Code section 35542(b)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5540, "fingerprint": "2013|201300004|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300004|KERN", "content_hash": "c95ededac133844a", "measure_id": "201300004", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Stallion Springs Community Services District levy an annual special tax beginning with fiscal year 2013 of up to $120 per parcel for the sole purpose of funding police protection services, all as provided in district resolution 2013-02?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 491, "no_votes": 307, "total_votes": 798, "percent_yes": 61.5, "percent_no": 38.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.062300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.948516", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Stallion Springs Community Services District levy an annual special tax beginning with fiscal year 2013 of up to $120 per parcel for the sole purpose of funding police protection services, all as provided in district resolution 2013-02?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5542, "fingerprint": "2013|201300107|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300107|KERN", "content_hash": "fd8f9fa7ba8f7ffc", "measure_id": "201300107", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality academic programs, school facilities, and activities that provide improved college and career pathways within SFID No. 2, shall the Mojave Unified School District levy a parcel tax in the amount of $42 to be levied annually for a period of five years, with mandatory audits, no money for administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 332, "no_votes": 163, "total_votes": 495, "percent_yes": 67.10000000000001, "percent_no": 32.89999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.062916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.948885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality academic programs, school facilities, and activities that provide improved college and career pathways within SFID No. 2, shall the Mojave Unified School District levy a parcel tax in the amount of $42 to be levied annually for a period of five years, with mandatory audits, no money for administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5543, "fingerprint": "2013|201300108|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300108|KERN", "content_hash": "635c93aac23de633", "measure_id": "201300108", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize, and upgrade Semitropic School, improve student safety and security, provide the classrooms and facilities to continue improving student achievement, and sustain the School\u2019s investment in modern classroom technology, shall the Semitropic School District be authorized to issue up to $5,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent taxpayers\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, NO funds for administrator salaries and ALL funds dedicated locally to improving the School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 21, "percent_yes": 57.1, "percent_no": 42.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education: Bonds", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.063203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.949071", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize, and upgrade Semitropic School, improve student safety and security, provide the classrooms and facilities to continue improving student achievement, and sustain the School\u2019s investment in modern classroom technology, shall the Semitropic School District be authorized to issue up to $5,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent taxpayers\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, NO funds for administrator salaries and ALL funds dedicated locally to improving the School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5544, "fingerprint": "2013|201300022|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300022|LAKE", "content_hash": "e4aea3276c1e9d2b", "measure_id": "201300022", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Clearlake impose a retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one percent (1%) within the City to be used for repair of City streets and roads and other transportation services and code enforcement, and shall the appropriations limit for the City of Clearlake for roadway repair and maintenance and code enforcement be increased for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 by the amount of the tax proceeds received by the City during that period.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1127, "no_votes": 737, "total_votes": 1864, "percent_yes": 60.5, "percent_no": 39.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.063483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.949273", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Clearlake impose a retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one percent (1%) within the City to be used for repair of City streets and roads and other transportation services and code enforcement, and shall the appropriations limit for the City of Clearlake for roadway repair and maintenance and code enforcement be increased for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 by the amount of the tax proceeds received by the City during that period.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5545, "fingerprint": "2013|201300005|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300005|LASSEN", "content_hash": "5a831183ece5b033", "measure_id": "201300005", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Jack Hanson be recalled (removed) from the office of Board of Supervisor, 5th District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 578, "no_votes": 351, "total_votes": 929, "percent_yes": 62.2, "percent_no": 37.8, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-09-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.063787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.949456", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jack Hanson be recalled (removed) from the office of Board of Supervisor, 5th District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11374, "fingerprint": "2013|201300056|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300056|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8551960eeab4979d", "measure_id": "201300056", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the directly elected mayor for the City of Hawthorne serve a four-year term of office rather than a two-year term of office, so that all members of the City Council of the City of Hawthorne serve four-year terms of office, effective for the 2015 election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2088, "no_votes": 2031, "total_votes": 4119, "percent_yes": 50.7, "percent_no": 49.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.971206", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.074176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.955919", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the directly elected mayor for the City of Hawthorne serve a four-year term of office rather than a two-year term of office, so that all members of the City Council of the City of Hawthorne serve four-year terms of office, effective for the 2015 election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11373, "fingerprint": "2013|201300051|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300051|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fb0db9ea614c622f", "measure_id": "201300051", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To stabilize the City financially and offset severe cuts in federal and state funding as well as sharp reductions in general fund revenues which threaten the City\u2019s ability to adequately provide general municipal services, including but not limited to police and fire service; and street, sidewalk, park and other vital infrastructure maintenance, shall an ordinance imposing a temporary, seven-year half percent (1/2%) transactions and use (sales) tax be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 567, "no_votes": 369, "total_votes": 936, "percent_yes": 60.6, "percent_no": 39.4, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.970216", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.072631", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.954976", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To stabilize the City financially and offset severe cuts in federal and state funding as well as sharp reductions in general fund revenues which threaten the City\u2019s ability to adequately provide general municipal services, including but not limited to police and fire service; and street, sidewalk, park and other vital infrastructure maintenance, shall an ordinance imposing a temporary, seven-year half percent (1/2%) transactions and use (sales) tax be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11368, "fingerprint": "2013|201300036|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300036|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "53dce844fdf36705", "measure_id": "201300036", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to convert the position of City Treasurer from elected to an appointed position; the appointment be made by the City Manager; be at-will; that the City Manager may assign certain duties to other deputies or the Director of Finance; that the minimum qualifications shall be in the Charter by reference to the Government Code; that the bond and oath of the City Clerk be filed with the City Attorney?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4726, "no_votes": 13812, "total_votes": 18538, "percent_yes": 25.5, "percent_no": 74.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.967262", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.068279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.952217", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to convert the position of City Treasurer from elected to an appointed position; the appointment be made by the City Manager; be at-will; that the City Manager may assign certain duties to other deputies or the Director of Finance; that the minimum qualifications shall be in the Charter by reference to the Government Code; that the bond and oath of the City Clerk be filed with the City Attorney?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11367, "fingerprint": "2013|201300033|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300033|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7d5d8942236c7041", "measure_id": "201300033", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for general city services, including public safety (Sheriff), parks and recreation, and maintenance of city streets and public area landscaping, shall the City of San Dimas approve an ordinance amending the San Dimas Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from eight (8%) to twelve (12%) on the rate charged to hotel and recreational vehicle campground guests staying within the City to be effective July 1, 2013?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1508, "no_votes": 1192, "total_votes": 2700, "percent_yes": 55.900000000000006, "percent_no": 44.099999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.966672", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.067435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.951667", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for general city services, including public safety (Sheriff), parks and recreation, and maintenance of city streets and public area landscaping, shall the City of San Dimas approve an ordinance amending the San Dimas Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from eight (8%) to twelve (12%) on the rate charged to hotel and recreational vehicle campground guests staying within the City to be effective July 1, 2013?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11365, "fingerprint": "2013|201300031|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300031|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4276e2457b8d4be9", "measure_id": "201300031", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted amending the zoning ordinance to allow stables constructed prior to July 12, 2010 to be used for residential purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 359, "no_votes": 450, "total_votes": 809, "percent_yes": 44.4, "percent_no": 55.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.966282", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.066866", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.951299", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted amending the zoning ordinance to allow stables constructed prior to July 12, 2010 to be used for residential purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11364, "fingerprint": "2013|201300030|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300030|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fce73b43ab1cfd0f", "measure_id": "201300030", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Redondo Beach Phase Out Existing Power Generation and Power Transmission from an Approximately 50-Acre Site and Set New Land Use and Development Standards by Amending the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, Harbor/Civic Center Specific Plan, Coastal Zoning, Zoning, and City Charter; the new land use would be allocated between 60-70% to parks and open space and the remaining 30-40% allocated between commercial, institutional or marine related light industrial/boatyard uses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6295, "no_votes": 6552, "total_votes": 12847, "percent_yes": 49.0, "percent_no": 51.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.966084", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.066499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.951112", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Redondo Beach Phase Out Existing Power Generation and Power Transmission from an Approximately 50-Acre Site and Set New Land Use and Development Standards by Amending the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, Harbor/Civic Center Specific Plan, Coastal Zoning, Zoning, and City Charter; the new land use would be allocated between 60-70% to parks and open space and the remaining 30-40% allocated between commercial, institutional or marine related light industrial/boatyard uses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11362, "fingerprint": "2013|201300026|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300026|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2569a84629fca88b", "measure_id": "201300026", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) To offset severe and repeated State cuts and provide funding for: 911 emergency response services; maintaining firefighter, paramedic, and police officer staffing levels; continuing community policing, senior services, after-school gang and drug prevention programs; repairing potholes and sidewalks; and other general municipal services; shall the City of Los Angeles enact a one-half cent transactions and use (generally referred to as sales) tax, with required independent audits, public review of expenditures, and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 153000, "no_votes": 184559, "total_votes": 337559, "percent_yes": 45.3, "percent_no": 54.7, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.965208", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.065382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.950377", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) To offset severe and repeated State cuts and provide funding for: 911 emergency response services; maintaining firefighter, paramedic, and police officer staffing levels; continuing community policing, senior services, after-school gang and drug prevention programs; repairing potholes and sidewalks; and other general municipal services; shall the City of Los Angeles enact a one-half cent transactions and use (generally referred to as sales) tax, with required independent audits, public review of expenditures, and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11361, "fingerprint": "2013|201300024|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300024|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d9c7519837ce37c4", "measure_id": "201300024", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to renew the City's authority to spend existing revenues from the special fire tax, approved by two-thirds of the City's voters in 1997, to provide essential fire and life-safety services, by renewing the voter-approved amendment to the City's appropriation limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 748, "no_votes": 519, "total_votes": 1267, "percent_yes": 59.0, "percent_no": 41.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Revenues: Voter Approval Requirement", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.964816", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.064670", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.950011", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to renew the City's authority to spend existing revenues from the special fire tax, approved by two-thirds of the City's voters in 1997, to provide essential fire and life-safety services, by renewing the voter-approved amendment to the City's appropriation limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5546, "fingerprint": "2013|201300006|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300006|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fe1f141221321347", "measure_id": "201300006", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(Advisory) Should the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors appoint future positions on the Board of Directors for the Pasadena Glen Community Services District in lieu of new Directors being elected by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45, "no_votes": 19, "total_votes": 64, "percent_yes": 70.3, "percent_no": 29.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-18", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.064078", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.949637", "update_count": 10, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Advisory) Should the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors appoint future positions on the Board of Directors for the Pasadena Glen Community Services District in lieu of new Directors being elected by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11375, "fingerprint": "2013|201300057|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300057|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "459085ff359f3972", "measure_id": "201300057", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to incrementally, over a five-year period, reduce the postmidnight operating hours of specified businesses in the downtown area of Hermosa Beach?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1318, "no_votes": 3523, "total_votes": 4841, "percent_yes": 27.200000000000003, "percent_no": 72.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.971404", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.074449", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.956102", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to incrementally, over a five-year period, reduce the postmidnight operating hours of specified businesses in the downtown area of Hermosa Beach?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11369, "fingerprint": "2013|201300037|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300037|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fad4c6d04272c07a", "measure_id": "201300037", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to update accounting provisions to eliminate obsolete funds and to reflect generally accepted accounting principles, to ensure proper accounting by establishing separate water and electric utility funds, and to clarify existing language regarding fund transfers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8767, "no_votes": 8954, "total_votes": 17721, "percent_yes": 49.5, "percent_no": 50.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Budget Processes", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.967464", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.068560", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.952402", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to update accounting provisions to eliminate obsolete funds and to reflect generally accepted accounting principles, to ensure proper accounting by establishing separate water and electric utility funds, and to clarify existing language regarding fund transfers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11366, "fingerprint": "2013|201300032|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300032|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5e3da5f6a043fcb2", "measure_id": "201300032", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted amending the current view preservation regulations by limiting protection only to views that existed at the time the owner acquired the property, exempting trees that were mature when the property was acquired, and establishing a higher burden of proof to show the existence of a protected view?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 408, "no_votes": 403, "total_votes": 811, "percent_yes": 50.3, "percent_no": 49.7, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.966477", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.067136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.951486", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted amending the current view preservation regulations by limiting protection only to views that existed at the time the owner acquired the property, exempting trees that were mature when the property was acquired, and establishing a higher burden of proof to show the existence of a protected view?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11363, "fingerprint": "2013|201300027|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300027|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "206b103747a42d5c", "measure_id": "201300027", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to authorize the City Council to allow sworn police personnel who are transferred from the Department of General Services to the Police Department to purchase, at their own expense, retirement credit for prior sworn City service after they become members of the Fire and Police Pension Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 186937, "no_votes": 135025, "total_votes": 321962, "percent_yes": 58.1, "percent_no": 41.9, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Personnel/Labor Relations", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.965402", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.065693", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.950561", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to authorize the City Council to allow sworn police personnel who are transferred from the Department of General Services to the Police Department to purchase, at their own expense, retirement credit for prior sworn City service after they become members of the Fire and Police Pension Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5548, "fingerprint": "2013|201300025|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300025|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b26c59fedaf3937a", "measure_id": "201300025", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to fund general municipal services, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the existing tax on resource extraction activities in the City of La Habra Heights and provide for future annual adjustments to reflect changes in the natural resource market?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 644, "no_votes": 623, "total_votes": 1267, "percent_yes": 50.8, "percent_no": 49.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.065112", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.950193", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to fund general municipal services, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the existing tax on resource extraction activities in the City of La Habra Heights and provide for future annual adjustments to reflect changes in the natural resource market?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5559, "fingerprint": "2013|201300046|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300046|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c78407ab38096c5f", "measure_id": "201300046", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to preserve Bradbury\u2019s essential city services, maintain a safe and quality community and meet the obligations of State and Federal Mandates, shall an ordinance be adopted to establish a Utility Users Tax on gas, electric, cable, trash, and telecommunications services at a rate not to exceed 7.5% (5.5% the first year) and 3.75% on water (2.75% the first year) for a period of 5 years, with exemptions for solar and certain low income households.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 163, "no_votes": 110, "total_votes": 273, "percent_yes": 59.7, "percent_no": 40.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.071166", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.954044", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to preserve Bradbury\u2019s essential city services, maintain a safe and quality community and meet the obligations of State and Federal Mandates, shall an ordinance be adopted to establish a Utility Users Tax on gas, electric, cable, trash, and telecommunications services at a rate not to exceed 7.5% (5.5% the first year) and 3.75% on water (2.75% the first year) for a period of 5 years, with exemptions for solar and certain low income households.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11372, "fingerprint": "2013|201300047|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300047|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "97276a1b730c5203", "measure_id": "201300047", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the voters adopt a resolution that there should be limits on political campaign spending and that corporations should not have the constitutional rights of human beings and instruct Los Angeles elected officials and area legislative representatives to promote that policy through amendments to the United States Constitution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 285770, "no_votes": 87037, "total_votes": 372807, "percent_yes": 76.7, "percent_no": 23.299999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-21", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.969428", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.071435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.954237", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the voters adopt a resolution that there should be limits on political campaign spending and that corporations should not have the constitutional rights of human beings and instruct Los Angeles elected officials and area legislative representatives to promote that policy through amendments to the United States Constitution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11370, "fingerprint": "2013|201300038|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300038|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c6a600487657cef6", "measure_id": "201300038", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to reflect the correct title of the Director of Finance, remove obsolete language regarding petty cash handling, require that the budget be adopted by June 30, and eliminate inefficiencies in bond sales by allowing flexibility?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7613, "no_votes": 9933, "total_votes": 17546, "percent_yes": 43.4, "percent_no": 56.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.967662", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.068829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.952588", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to reflect the correct title of the Director of Finance, remove obsolete language regarding petty cash handling, require that the budget be adopted by June 30, and eliminate inefficiencies in bond sales by allowing flexibility?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5552, "fingerprint": "2013|201300035|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300035|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a8351c2e975f3853", "measure_id": "201300035", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted limiting the number of terms a person may serve on the West Hollywood City Council to no more than three terms, including partial terms, whether or not consecutive, commencing with terms served by persons elected at or after the March 2013 election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3139, "no_votes": 1888, "total_votes": 5027, "percent_yes": 62.4, "percent_no": 37.6, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.068010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.952034", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted limiting the number of terms a person may serve on the West Hollywood City Council to no more than three terms, including partial terms, whether or not consecutive, commencing with terms served by persons elected at or after the March 2013 election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5560, "fingerprint": "2013|201300048|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300048|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1048d686ca222985", "measure_id": "201300048", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance regulating businesses where marijuana is cultivated, processed, distributed, delivered or given away to qualified patients or primary caregivers (MMBs) by: (1) prohibiting MMBs but providing limited immunity for MMBs that operated since September 2007, timely registered with the City, generally have not ceased operations, pay City taxes, pass annual background checks, are separated from residential zones, maintain certain distances from schools, parks, child care facilities, other designated places and other MMBs, and meet other requirements and operational standards; (2) exempting dwelling units used by three or fewer patients/caregivers to cultivate medical marijuana on-site for their patients or themselves, and other exemptions; and (3) increasing the MMB tax to $60 per each $1,000 of gross receipts; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 234793, "no_votes": 141240, "total_votes": 376033, "percent_yes": 62.4, "percent_no": 37.6, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-21", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.071772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.954420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance regulating businesses where marijuana is cultivated, processed, distributed, delivered or given away to qualified patients or primary caregivers (MMBs) by: (1) prohibiting MMBs but providing limited immunity for MMBs that operated since September 2007, timely registered with the City, generally have not ceased operations, pay City taxes, pass annual background checks, are separated from residential zones, maintain certain distances from schools, parks, child care facilities, other designated places and other MMBs, and meet other requirements and operational standards; (2) exempting dwelling units used by three or fewer patients/caregivers to cultivate medical marijuana on-site for their patients or themselves, and other exemptions; and (3) increasing the MMB tax to $60 per each $1,000 of gross receipts; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5549, "fingerprint": "2013|201300028|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300028|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e51b3afdfdd96769", "measure_id": "201300028", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance that does not increase the City's telephone utility user tax rate but rather amends the\r\nCity's telephone utility tax code to reflect changes in electronic communication equipment, methods and regulations be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2551, "no_votes": 1693, "total_votes": 4244, "percent_yes": 60.1, "percent_no": 39.9, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.065963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.950745", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance that does not increase the City's telephone utility user tax rate but rather amends the\r\nCity's telephone utility tax code to reflect changes in electronic communication equipment, methods and regulations be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5561, "fingerprint": "2013|201300049|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300049|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cdb9763a6171bd74", "measure_id": "201300049", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance regulating associations of six or more qualified patients and/or primary caregivers who gather to cultivate, distribute or engage in other activities related to marijuana for medical purposes (MMCs) by: (1) prohibiting MMCs but providing limited immunity for MMCs that operated since September 2007, timely registered with the City, generally have not ceased operations for 90 days, pass annual background checks, are separated from residential zones, maintain certain distances from schools, parks, child care facilities and other designated places, and satisfy other requirements; (2) establishing operational standards enforceable as infractions; and (3) exempting associations of five or fewer patients/caregivers who process or cultivate medical marijuana on-site for MMCs, their patients or themselves, and other exemptions; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117421, "no_votes": 225227, "total_votes": 342648, "percent_yes": 34.300000000000004, "percent_no": 65.69999999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-21", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.072075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.954608", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance regulating associations of six or more qualified patients and/or primary caregivers who gather to cultivate, distribute or engage in other activities related to marijuana for medical purposes (MMCs) by: (1) prohibiting MMCs but providing limited immunity for MMCs that operated since September 2007, timely registered with the City, generally have not ceased operations for 90 days, pass annual background checks, are separated from residential zones, maintain certain distances from schools, parks, child care facilities and other designated places, and satisfy other requirements; (2) establishing operational standards enforceable as infractions; and (3) exempting associations of five or fewer patients/caregivers who process or cultivate medical marijuana on-site for MMCs, their patients or themselves, and other exemptions; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5550, "fingerprint": "2013|201300029|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300029|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4b2dda9db81116c7", "measure_id": "201300029", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance implementing term limits for the City Council, City Treasurer, and City Clerk be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3589, "no_votes": 862, "total_votes": 4451, "percent_yes": 80.60000000000001, "percent_no": 19.39999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Political Reform/Term Limits", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.066231", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.950929", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance implementing term limits for the City Council, City Treasurer, and City Clerk be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5564, "fingerprint": "2013|201300053|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300053|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7635f19cd3643139", "measure_id": "201300053", "measure_letter": "EM", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office for the elected office of Mayor be extended from two (2) years to four (4) years, commencing with the 2015 General Municipal Election cycle?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1921, "no_votes": 2665, "total_votes": 4586, "percent_yes": 41.9, "percent_no": 58.1, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.073344", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.955360", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office for the elected office of Mayor be extended from two (2) years to four (4) years, commencing with the 2015 General Municipal Election cycle?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5562, "fingerprint": "2013|201300050|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300050|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "675180a3ca54e7b9", "measure_id": "201300050", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance regulating associations of qualified patients and/or primary caregivers who cultivate, provide or engage in other activities related to marijuana for medical purposes (MMCs) by: (1) prohibiting MMCs but providing limited immunity for MMCs that register with the City (without limiting the number that can register but giving registration priority to those possessing City tax certificates by October 2012), generally have not ceased operations for more than 90 days, pass annual background checks, are separated from residential uses, maintain certain distances from schools, parks, child care facilities, other designated places and other MMCs, and meet other requirements and operational standards; (2) exempting dwellings zoned residential, and other exemptions; and (3) increasing the MMC tax to $60 per each $1,000 of gross receipts; be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 144268, "no_votes": 206015, "total_votes": 350283, "percent_yes": 41.2, "percent_no": 58.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-21", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.072355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.954794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance regulating associations of qualified patients and/or primary caregivers who cultivate, provide or engage in other activities related to marijuana for medical purposes (MMCs) by: (1) prohibiting MMCs but providing limited immunity for MMCs that register with the City (without limiting the number that can register but giving registration priority to those possessing City tax certificates by October 2012), generally have not ceased operations for more than 90 days, pass annual background checks, are separated from residential uses, maintain certain distances from schools, parks, child care facilities, other designated places and other MMCs, and meet other requirements and operational standards; (2) exempting dwellings zoned residential, and other exemptions; and (3) increasing the MMC tax to $60 per each $1,000 of gross receipts; be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5563, "fingerprint": "2013|201300052|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300052|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "152ee56169c3137b", "measure_id": "201300052", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the Monterey Park Municipal Code to authorize and direct the City Council to negotiate to transfer all functions of the Monterey Park Fire Department to the consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (aka the Los Angeles County Fire Department) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2290, "no_votes": 4102, "total_votes": 6392, "percent_yes": 35.8, "percent_no": 64.2, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-07-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.072990", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.955173", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the Monterey Park Municipal Code to authorize and direct the City Council to negotiate to transfer all functions of the Monterey Park Fire Department to the consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (aka the Los Angeles County Fire Department) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5565, "fingerprint": "2013|201300054|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300054|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f36bfc3fe9c42a86", "measure_id": "201300054", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve and stabilize funding for essential public services such as keeping the City\u2019s four fire stations open; maintaining staffing levels for emergency response police services; street lighting and repair; senior services; and youth parks programs and to build the City\u2019s \u201crainy day\" general fund reserves, shall the City\u2019s existing one half of one percent (1/2%) transactions and use tax be extended for five years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3331, "no_votes": 1366, "total_votes": 4697, "percent_yes": 70.89999999999999, "percent_no": 29.10000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.073625", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.955543", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve and stabilize funding for essential public services such as keeping the City\u2019s four fire stations open; maintaining staffing levels for emergency response police services; street lighting and repair; senior services; and youth parks programs and to build the City\u2019s \u201crainy day\" general fund reserves, shall the City\u2019s existing one half of one percent (1/2%) transactions and use tax be extended for five years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5558, "fingerprint": "2013|201300045|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300045|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0e833230ae19b91f", "measure_id": "201300045", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the \"Police Powers\" that can be provided in the City of Compton by a municipal Police Department be provided by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3779, "no_votes": 2428, "total_votes": 6207, "percent_yes": 60.9, "percent_no": 39.1, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Safety: Police", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-16", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.070888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.953863", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \"Police Powers\" that can be provided in the City of Compton by a municipal Police Department be provided by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5556, "fingerprint": "2013|201300042|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300042|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6739d1df085357a0", "measure_id": "201300042", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the rates of the City's existing business license taxes and to modify the method for calculating such taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37, "no_votes": 5, "total_votes": 42, "percent_yes": 88.1, "percent_no": 11.900000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.070031", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.953321", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the rates of the City's existing business license taxes and to modify the method for calculating such taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5557, "fingerprint": "2013|201300043|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300043|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "128af6318f48841c", "measure_id": "201300043", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize, for a period of ten years, the levy of an annual special parcel tax on non-residential parcels at the rate of $0.03 per square foot (adjusted annually for inflation) to fund (i) City fire protection services and projects, (ii) City health services and projects, and (iii) City police services and projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 42, "percent_yes": 85.7, "percent_no": 14.299999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.070303", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.953503", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize, for a period of ten years, the levy of an annual special parcel tax on non-residential parcels at the rate of $0.03 per square foot (adjusted annually for inflation) to fund (i) City fire protection services and projects, (ii) City health services and projects, and (iii) City police services and projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11371, "fingerprint": "2013|201300044|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300044|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f528b14a9a1c5806", "measure_id": "201300044", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize, for a period of ten years, the levy of a 1% utility users' tax on electricity, gas, telecommunications, video and water utility services, with exemptions for residential services provided to persons with disabilities and low income households?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34, "no_votes": 7, "total_votes": 41, "percent_yes": 82.89999999999999, "percent_no": 17.10000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.968845", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.070570", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.953683", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize, for a period of ten years, the levy of a 1% utility users' tax on electricity, gas, telecommunications, video and water utility services, with exemptions for residential services provided to persons with disabilities and low income households?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5547, "fingerprint": "2013|201300023|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300023|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ac8cc7dfcf65955b", "measure_id": "201300023", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Carson eliminate the direct election of a mayor and return to selection of a mayor by the city council, on a rotating basis, with the mayor to be compensated the same as all other members of the City Council, the same to be effective commencing in 2017?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1851, "no_votes": 9222, "total_votes": 11073, "percent_yes": 16.7, "percent_no": 83.3, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.064396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.949821", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Carson eliminate the direct election of a mayor and return to selection of a mayor by the city council, on a rotating basis, with the mayor to be compensated the same as all other members of the City Council, the same to be effective commencing in 2017?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5553, "fingerprint": "2013|201300039|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300039|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "75d29559cb24c514", "measure_id": "201300039", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow for the publication of a summary of an ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3974, "no_votes": 1573, "total_votes": 5547, "percent_yes": 71.6, "percent_no": 28.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.069126", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.952769", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow for the publication of a summary of an ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5567, "fingerprint": "2013|201300110|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300110|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9a4eb86097bd63bc", "measure_id": "201300110", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to continue funding quality educational programs and classroom instruction, prevent increases in class sizes and reductions in teaching positions, attract and retain high quality teachers and employees, and support educational programs that enhance student achievement, shall the San Marino Unified School District extend its expiring school parcel tax for six years at $330 per parcel with an exemption for seniors, adjustment for inflation and all money staying in our community to benefit our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2267, "no_votes": 900, "total_votes": 3167, "percent_yes": 71.6, "percent_no": 28.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.075275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.956652", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to continue funding quality educational programs and classroom instruction, prevent increases in class sizes and reductions in teaching positions, attract and retain high quality teachers and employees, and support educational programs that enhance student achievement, shall the San Marino Unified School District extend its expiring school parcel tax for six years at $330 per parcel with an exemption for seniors, adjustment for inflation and all money staying in our community to benefit our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5566, "fingerprint": "2013|201300055|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300055|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "31c5e62957f457e7", "measure_id": "201300055", "measure_letter": "RM", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council be reorganized to replace the current structure of one elected Mayor serving a two-year term and four elected Council Members serving staggered four-year terms with a structure composed of five elected City Council Members who will share the title of Mayor on a rotating basis subject to voter approved procedures for accomplishing the rotation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1798, "no_votes": 2686, "total_votes": 4484, "percent_yes": 40.1, "percent_no": 59.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.073906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.955737", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council be reorganized to replace the current structure of one elected Mayor serving a two-year term and four elected Council Members serving staggered four-year terms with a structure composed of five elected City Council Members who will share the title of Mayor on a rotating basis subject to voter approved procedures for accomplishing the rotation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11378, "fingerprint": "2013|201300111|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300111|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0ebac94fea49ebec", "measure_id": "201300111", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for success in college/careers and minimize local impacts of state school funding cuts; continue local funding to attract/retain highly qualified teachers; maintain manageable class sizes, advanced instruction in math/science/technology, and music/art programs; shall South Pasadena Unified School District renew/increase its expiring annual school parcel tax by $98 (as described in the ballot pamphlet) for five years, with senior exemptions and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4679, "no_votes": 1751, "total_votes": 6430, "percent_yes": 72.8, "percent_no": 27.200000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.972184", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.075550", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.956834", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for success in college/careers and minimize local impacts of state school funding cuts; continue local funding to attract/retain highly qualified teachers; maintain manageable class sizes, advanced instruction in math/science/technology, and music/art programs; shall South Pasadena Unified School District renew/increase its expiring annual school parcel tax by $98 (as described in the ballot pamphlet) for five years, with senior exemptions and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11377, "fingerprint": "2013|201300109|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300109|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5aa94f046f10d3eb", "measure_id": "201300109", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality and safety of Burbank school facilities, to upgrade classrooms, computers and technology, to replace aging portable classrooms, electrical systems, plumbing and sewer lines, roofs and play areas, to improve student safety and security including upgraded fire protection, increase energy efficiency and to provide accessibility for students with disabilities, shall Burbank Unified School District be authorized to issue $110,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizens oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4663, "no_votes": 2884, "total_votes": 7547, "percent_yes": 61.8, "percent_no": 38.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education: Bonds", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.971794", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.074997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.956465", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality and safety of Burbank school facilities, to upgrade classrooms, computers and technology, to replace aging portable classrooms, electrical systems, plumbing and sewer lines, roofs and play areas, to improve student safety and security including upgraded fire protection, increase energy efficiency and to provide accessibility for students with disabilities, shall Burbank Unified School District be authorized to issue $110,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizens oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11376, "fingerprint": "2013|201300058|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300058|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c86345d26c386ebf", "measure_id": "201300058", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1044, which would increase the oil barrel tax charged to operators of oil wells in the City from $.20 per barrel to an amount ranging from a minimum of $.41 to a maximum of $.52 per barrel, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1309, "no_votes": 506, "total_votes": 1815, "percent_yes": 72.1, "percent_no": 27.900000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.971599", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.074718", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.956282", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1044, which would increase the oil barrel tax charged to operators of oil wells in the City from $.20 per barrel to an amount ranging from a minimum of $.41 to a maximum of $.52 per barrel, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5555, "fingerprint": "2013|201300041|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300041|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ae71dc2251935c92", "measure_id": "201300041", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of Burbank establishing a special tax not exceeding 2% on fees and charges for sewer and refuse collection services to be used exclusively to support the City's Sewer Fund and Refuse Assistance Programs that reduce rates for eligible low-income customers, including seniors over 62 years of age, persons with a permanent disability, persons requiring life support, or households with a disabled person or person requiring life support?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3806, "no_votes": 4930, "total_votes": 8736, "percent_yes": 43.6, "percent_no": 56.4, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.069692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.953139", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of Burbank establishing a special tax not exceeding 2% on fees and charges for sewer and refuse collection services to be used exclusively to support the City's Sewer Fund and Refuse Assistance Programs that reduce rates for eligible low-income customers, including seniors over 62 years of age, persons with a permanent disability, persons requiring life support, or households with a disabled person or person requiring life support?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5551, "fingerprint": "2013|201300034|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300034|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0defc5fa508b4337", "measure_id": "201300034", "measure_letter": "SG", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for general city services, including public safety, repairing, paving and maintaining local streets, keeping public areas and landscape clean and well maintained, and preserving fire and paramedic emergency response times, shall the City of San Gabriel approve an ordinance amending the San Gabriel Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate charged to hotel guests staying within the City from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%), to be effective April 1, 2013?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2143, "no_votes": 631, "total_votes": 2774, "percent_yes": 77.3, "percent_no": 22.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.067711", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.951848", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for general city services, including public safety, repairing, paving and maintaining local streets, keeping public areas and landscape clean and well maintained, and preserving fire and paramedic emergency response times, shall the City of San Gabriel approve an ordinance amending the San Gabriel Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate charged to hotel guests staying within the City from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%), to be effective April 1, 2013?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11379, "fingerprint": "2013|201300112|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300112|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "aa04a79dcd14a053", "measure_id": "201300112", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Wiseburn School District be reorganized to form the Wiseburn Unified School District from part of the territory formerly covered by the Centinela Valley Union High School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1579, "no_votes": 123, "total_votes": 1702, "percent_yes": 92.8, "percent_no": 7.200000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.972380", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.075874", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.957015", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Wiseburn School District be reorganized to form the Wiseburn Unified School District from part of the territory formerly covered by the Centinela Valley Union High School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5554, "fingerprint": "2013|201300040|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300040|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "126de7962f049b71", "measure_id": "201300040", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow for the waiving of a full reading of an ordinance when a majority of the Councilmembers present agree to the waiver?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3154, "no_votes": 2369, "total_votes": 5523, "percent_yes": 57.1, "percent_no": 42.9, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.069422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.952953", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow for the waiving of a full reading of an ordinance when a majority of the Councilmembers present agree to the waiver?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11382, "fingerprint": "2013|201300116|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300116|MARIN", "content_hash": "0e8c5d0cd022d196", "measure_id": "201300116", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize learning environments, classrooms and libraries; renovate outdated school facilities; improve energy efficiency; enhance student access to technology; make health and safety renovations; upgrade playgrounds and playfields; and replace outdated windows and heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems, shall the Lagunitas School District issue $5,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no bond money taken by the state or used for teacher or administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 754, "no_votes": 339, "total_votes": 1093, "percent_yes": 69.0, "percent_no": 31.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education: Bonds", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.974149", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.078592", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.958713", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize learning environments, classrooms and libraries; renovate outdated school facilities; improve energy efficiency; enhance student access to technology; make health and safety renovations; upgrade playgrounds and playfields; and replace outdated windows and heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems, shall the Lagunitas School District issue $5,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have no bond money taken by the state or used for teacher or administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11381, "fingerprint": "2013|201300115|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300115|MARIN", "content_hash": "f8f9878de8013520", "measure_id": "201300115", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District continue funding quality educational programs by levying a special tax assessment of $300 per year per assessor\u2019s parcel for a limited period of six (6) years, beginning July 1, 2014, with an exemption for any beneficial owner of a parcel who has attained\r\nthe age of 65 on or before May 1 of any applicable year, who uses that parcel as his or her principal residence?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 367, "no_votes": 167, "total_votes": 534, "percent_yes": 68.7, "percent_no": 31.299999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.973954", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.078299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.958518", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District continue funding quality educational programs by levying a special tax assessment of $300 per year per assessor\u2019s parcel for a limited period of six (6) years, beginning July 1, 2014, with an exemption for any beneficial owner of a parcel who has attained\r\nthe age of 65 on or before May 1 of any applicable year, who uses that parcel as his or her principal residence?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5573, "fingerprint": "2013|201300113|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300113|MARIN", "content_hash": "6609f1427c618eae", "measure_id": "201300113", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education at all San Rafael elementary and middle schools by maintaining stable local funding the State can\u2019t take away, including: enhancing core academic programs like math, science, and reading; maintaining small class sizes and programs that support learning; and attracting and retaining high quality teachers, shall San Rafael Elementary School District extend the expiring school parcel tax for eight years with exemptions for seniors, independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds staying\r\nlocal?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7752, "no_votes": 2106, "total_votes": 9858, "percent_yes": 78.60000000000001, "percent_no": 21.39999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.077695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.958130", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education at all San Rafael elementary and middle schools by maintaining stable local funding the State can\u2019t take away, including: enhancing core academic programs like math, science, and reading; maintaining small class sizes and programs that support learning; and attracting and retaining high quality teachers, shall San Rafael Elementary School District extend the expiring school parcel tax for eight years with exemptions for seniors, independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds staying\r\nlocal?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11380, "fingerprint": "2013|201300114|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300114|MARIN", "content_hash": "c854eb9c962d520d", "measure_id": "201300114", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education at San Rafael and Terra Linda High Schools with stable local funding the State can\u2019t take away, including: enhancing math, science, technology, music and fine art instruction; maintaining small class sizes; preparing students for college and 21st-century careers; and attracting and retaining quality teachers, shall San Rafael High School District extend the expiring school parcel tax for eight years with senior exemptions, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12513, "no_votes": 3310, "total_votes": 15823, "percent_yes": 79.10000000000001, "percent_no": 20.89999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.973756", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.077986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.958321", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education at San Rafael and Terra Linda High Schools with stable local funding the State can\u2019t take away, including: enhancing math, science, technology, music and fine art instruction; maintaining small class sizes; preparing students for college and 21st-century careers; and attracting and retaining quality teachers, shall San Rafael High School District extend the expiring school parcel tax for eight years with senior exemptions, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5569, "fingerprint": "2013|201300059|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300059|MARIN", "content_hash": "14d3b1d30217ba43", "measure_id": "201300059", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential Town services including but not limited to: current levels of local fire prevention, flood control, streets and potholes, disaster preparedness, safe routes to schools, and senior and youth programs, shall the Town enact a half-cent sales tax for 6 years, requiring a citizen\u2019s oversight committee review and annual examination to ensure funds are spent locally as promised for the benefit of Corte Madera residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1785, "no_votes": 837, "total_votes": 2622, "percent_yes": 68.10000000000001, "percent_no": 31.89999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.076523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.957378", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential Town services including but not limited to: current levels of local fire prevention, flood control, streets and potholes, disaster preparedness, safe routes to schools, and senior and youth programs, shall the Town enact a half-cent sales tax for 6 years, requiring a citizen\u2019s oversight committee review and annual examination to ensure funds are spent locally as promised for the benefit of Corte Madera residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5570, "fingerprint": "2013|201300060|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300060|MARIN", "content_hash": "6c18fcaf96238211", "measure_id": "201300060", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To repair aging and deteriorating neighborhood streets and roads; repair potholes; maintain police and fire protection; maintain 9-1-1 emergency/medical response; clear hazardous and flammable brush to prevent fires and improve emergency vehicle access; and maintain essential city services, shall the City of Larkspur enact a \u00bd cent sales tax for 5 years with annual performance reviews, independent annual audits, citizens oversight, and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2771, "no_votes": 884, "total_votes": 3655, "percent_yes": 75.8, "percent_no": 24.200000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.076805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.957568", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging and deteriorating neighborhood streets and roads; repair potholes; maintain police and fire protection; maintain 9-1-1 emergency/medical response; clear hazardous and flammable brush to prevent fires and improve emergency vehicle access; and maintain essential city services, shall the City of Larkspur enact a \u00bd cent sales tax for 5 years with annual performance reviews, independent annual audits, citizens oversight, and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5571, "fingerprint": "2013|201300061|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300061|MARIN", "content_hash": "4a6f20a660ccca2f", "measure_id": "201300061", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To repair potholes, repave roads, reduce traffic congestion, maintain and improve sidewalks/drainage/street medians, preserve public safety, and improve other general Town services, facilities, and infrastructure, shall the Town of San Anselmo establish a one-half percent (.5%) sales tax for ten years, with annual independent audits, mandatory public expenditure reports, and an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with all funds staying in San Anselmo under local control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2376, "no_votes": 1022, "total_votes": 3398, "percent_yes": 69.89999999999999, "percent_no": 30.10000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.077082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.957759", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair potholes, repave roads, reduce traffic congestion, maintain and improve sidewalks/drainage/street medians, preserve public safety, and improve other general Town services, facilities, and infrastructure, shall the Town of San Anselmo establish a one-half percent (.5%) sales tax for ten years, with annual independent audits, mandatory public expenditure reports, and an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with all funds staying in San Anselmo under local control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5572, "fingerprint": "2013|201300062|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300062|MARIN", "content_hash": "263e53c125cd70e0", "measure_id": "201300062", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Rafael extend the existing one-half percent local sales tax and increase the rate by one-quarter percent to provide funding that cannot be taken by the State, and can be used to preserve essential city services for a period of 20 years, including: maintaining rapid emergency police/fire response times, maintaining adequate numbers of on-duty firefighters/paramedics/police, ensuring earthquake safe police/fire stations, maintaining community centers and repairing city streets?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7760, "no_votes": 4123, "total_votes": 11883, "percent_yes": 65.3, "percent_no": 34.7, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.077353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.957949", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Rafael extend the existing one-half percent local sales tax and increase the rate by one-quarter percent to provide funding that cannot be taken by the State, and can be used to preserve essential city services for a period of 20 years, including: maintaining rapid emergency police/fire response times, maintaining adequate numbers of on-duty firefighters/paramedics/police, ensuring earthquake safe police/fire stations, maintaining community centers and repairing city streets?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5568, "fingerprint": "2013|201300007|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300007|MARIN", "content_hash": "57b4b85eb864b263", "measure_id": "201300007", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the four fiscal years 2013-2014 through 2016-2017 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for park maintenance services previously approved by the voters in March, 2005?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1109, "no_votes": 322, "total_votes": 1431, "percent_yes": 77.5, "percent_no": 22.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": "Governance: Budget Processes", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.076153", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.957196", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the four fiscal years 2013-2014 through 2016-2017 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for park maintenance services previously approved by the voters in March, 2005?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5574, "fingerprint": "2013|201300063|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300063|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "c2737cdd51411100", "measure_id": "201300063", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the local Fort Bragg special purpose transactions and use tax (sales tax) of one-half of one percent for the express purpose of repairing, maintaining, and reconstructing existing streets, which expires December 31, 2014, be extended until December 31, 2024 to allow for continued maintenance of streets and alleys in Fort Bragg?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 757, "no_votes": 322, "total_votes": 1079, "percent_yes": 70.19999999999999, "percent_no": 29.80000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-08-27", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.078864", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.958902", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the local Fort Bragg special purpose transactions and use tax (sales tax) of one-half of one percent for the express purpose of repairing, maintaining, and reconstructing existing streets, which expires December 31, 2014, be extended until December 31, 2024 to allow for continued maintenance of streets and alleys in Fort Bragg?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5575, "fingerprint": "2013|201300064|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300064|MERCED", "content_hash": "49edf9e0f5d19c73", "measure_id": "201300064", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the City's long-term financial stability and maintain public safety services, including police patrols and fire protection; 911 emergency response; rapid response to gang violence, robberies and burglaries; park safety; youth, shall the City of Atwater enact a one-half cent sales tax, for the term of up to ten (10) years, with all funds to be spent locally, requiring independent Citizen's Oversight and published annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1822, "no_votes": 895, "total_votes": 2717, "percent_yes": 67.10000000000001, "percent_no": 32.89999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.079174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.959083", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the City's long-term financial stability and maintain public safety services, including police patrols and fire protection; 911 emergency response; rapid response to gang violence, robberies and burglaries; park safety; youth, shall the City of Atwater enact a one-half cent sales tax, for the term of up to ten (10) years, with all funds to be spent locally, requiring independent Citizen's Oversight and published annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5577, "fingerprint": "2013|201300066|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300066|MERCED", "content_hash": "0af81f79a4929f72", "measure_id": "201300066", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 400 of the City Charter be amended to reduce election costs to the City by consolidating the Mayor and City Council elections with statewide elections in even numbered years resulting in the next City election being in 2016 rather than 2015 and making a one-time adjustment in Mayor and City Council terms and term-limits to accomplish the change?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6339, "no_votes": 698, "total_votes": 7037, "percent_yes": 90.1, "percent_no": 9.900000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.079819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.959443", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 400 of the City Charter be amended to reduce election costs to the City by consolidating the Mayor and City Council elections with statewide elections in even numbered years resulting in the next City election being in 2016 rather than 2015 and making a one-time adjustment in Mayor and City Council terms and term-limits to accomplish the change?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5576, "fingerprint": "2013|201300065|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300065|MERCED", "content_hash": "9b815514d785de41", "measure_id": "201300065", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain the number of local police officers/firefighters/E-M-Ts, anti-gang/crime units, and 9-1-1 emergency response times shall Los Banos voters extend Measure A for no more than 7 years to address local public safety needs and protect/maintain police officer and firefighter positions, with citizens oversight, independent annual audits, keeping all funds exclusively for Los Banos without raising taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2357, "no_votes": 375, "total_votes": 2732, "percent_yes": 86.3, "percent_no": 13.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Multiple Emergency Services", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.079486", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.959262", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the number of local police officers/firefighters/E-M-Ts, anti-gang/crime units, and 9-1-1 emergency response times shall Los Banos voters extend Measure A for no more than 7 years to address local public safety needs and protect/maintain police officer and firefighter positions, with citizens oversight, independent annual audits, keeping all funds exclusively for Los Banos without raising taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5580, "fingerprint": "2013|201300118|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300118|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "25abdbdf61ff4672", "measure_id": "201300118", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational technology; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; implement statewide technology requirements for testing and learning; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall Pacific Grove Unified School District issue $27.8 million of short-term bonds with the interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator/teacher salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2828, "no_votes": 2593, "total_votes": 5421, "percent_yes": 52.2, "percent_no": 47.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education: Bonds", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.080771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.959985", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student access to computers; maintain and upgrade educational technology; keep pace with 21st century technological innovations; implement statewide technology requirements for testing and learning; and significantly reduce borrowing costs, shall Pacific Grove Unified School District issue $27.8 million of short-term bonds with the interest rates below the legal limit, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrator/teacher salaries, so long as all funds are spent locally and cannot be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5579, "fingerprint": "2013|201300117|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300117|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7aa18e729463d99f", "measure_id": "201300117", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize aging school facilities and classrooms, upgrade libraries, replace leaking and deteriorating roofs, improve energy efficiency by upgrading heating, electrical and plumbing systems, upgrade athletic facilities, upgrade access to instructional technology, and improve school safety and security, shall the North Monterey County Unified School District be authorized to issue $23,800,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2453, "no_votes": 1566, "total_votes": 4019, "percent_yes": 61.0, "percent_no": 39.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education: Bonds", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.080472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.959801", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize aging school facilities and classrooms, upgrade libraries, replace leaking and deteriorating roofs, improve energy efficiency by upgrading heating, electrical and plumbing systems, upgrade athletic facilities, upgrade access to instructional technology, and improve school safety and security, shall the North Monterey County Unified School District be authorized to issue $23,800,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5578, "fingerprint": "2013|201300067|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300067|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b41f494d2d421676", "measure_id": "201300067", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring each cardroom within the City to pay the City a tax of 5% of annual gross gaming revenues commencing January 1, 2014, to fund general municipal services such as public safety, street maintenance and neighborhood improvements", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2185, "no_votes": 779, "total_votes": 2964, "percent_yes": 73.7, "percent_no": 26.299999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.080104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.959622", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring each cardroom within the City to pay the City a tax of 5% of annual gross gaming revenues commencing January 1, 2014, to fund general municipal services such as public safety, street maintenance and neighborhood improvements", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5581, "fingerprint": "2013|201300068|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300068|NAPA", "content_hash": "1a0ff71f2a791865", "measure_id": "201300068", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution 2012-062, a general plan amendment approved by the City Council to establish a planned development overlay and certain planned development goals for the property generally located at 515 Foothill Boulevard, Calistoga, which will allow the development of the Enchanted Resorts resort and residential project, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 781, "no_votes": 643, "total_votes": 1424, "percent_yes": 54.8, "percent_no": 45.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.081043", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.960170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution 2012-062, a general plan amendment approved by the City Council to establish a planned development overlay and certain planned development goals for the property generally located at 515 Foothill Boulevard, Calistoga, which will allow the development of the Enchanted Resorts resort and residential project, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5582, "fingerprint": "2013|201300069|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300069|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3ac93adeb06b9a8a", "measure_id": "201300069", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance approving amendments to the Amended and Restated Cypress Business & Professional Center Specific Plan, together with related General Plan amendments and a zone change, to allow additional uses, including single-family housing and neighborhood commercial uses, in one planning area adjacent to Cerritos Avenue, and additional uses, including mixed-use commercial and business park uses, in a second planning area southeast of the Los Alamitos Race Course between Katella and Cerritos Avenues, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2047, "no_votes": 4825, "total_votes": 6872, "percent_yes": 29.8, "percent_no": 70.2, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-25", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.081365", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.960352", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance approving amendments to the Amended and Restated Cypress Business & Professional Center Specific Plan, together with related General Plan amendments and a zone change, to allow additional uses, including single-family housing and neighborhood commercial uses, in one planning area adjacent to Cerritos Avenue, and additional uses, including mixed-use commercial and business park uses, in a second planning area southeast of the Los Alamitos Race Course between Katella and Cerritos Avenues, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5583, "fingerprint": "2013|201300070|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300070|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "21300b069810abf8", "measure_id": "201300070", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain general fund services such as 9-1-1 response; police patrols/fire protection; children\u2019s after-school and senior/disabled services; and protect supplies of clean drinking water from contamination; shall Section 1204.1 be added to the Charter continuing the annual transfer of funds from the City water utility to the general fund approved by City voters in 1968, with independent audits, funds staying local and no increase in taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16844, "no_votes": 7995, "total_votes": 24839, "percent_yes": 67.80000000000001, "percent_no": 32.19999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Budget Processes", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.081676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.960534", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain general fund services such as 9-1-1 response; police patrols/fire protection; children\u2019s after-school and senior/disabled services; and protect supplies of clean drinking water from contamination; shall Section 1204.1 be added to the Charter continuing the annual transfer of funds from the City water utility to the general fund approved by City voters in 1968, with independent audits, funds staying local and no increase in taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5587, "fingerprint": "2013|201300074|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300074|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8c821de1b0e522de", "measure_id": "201300074", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to help fund general municipal services, including but not limited to such matters as police protection and crime suppression services, fire prevention and suppression services, emergency medical services, park, recreation, and library facilities and services, and general improvements throughout the City, shall an ordinance to impose a tax at a rate of up to 15 cents per $1.00 of proceeds on cannabis or marijuana collectives operating in the City of Palm Springs be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5585, "no_votes": 2842, "total_votes": 8427, "percent_yes": 66.3, "percent_no": 33.7, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.082945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.961349", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to help fund general municipal services, including but not limited to such matters as police protection and crime suppression services, fire prevention and suppression services, emergency medical services, park, recreation, and library facilities and services, and general improvements throughout the City, shall an ordinance to impose a tax at a rate of up to 15 cents per $1.00 of proceeds on cannabis or marijuana collectives operating in the City of Palm Springs be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5584, "fingerprint": "2013|201300071|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300071|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e493b68e92eb92cb", "measure_id": "201300071", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 350, "no_votes": 848, "total_votes": 1198, "percent_yes": 29.2, "percent_no": 70.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance: Organization", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.082099", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.960726", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5585, "fingerprint": "2013|201300072|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300072|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "799c5ecd6b0d205c", "measure_id": "201300072", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 148 enacting a special tax to fund the continuation of Fire Station 60 and to fund fire protection services in the City of Canyon Lake be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1277, "no_votes": 1254, "total_votes": 2531, "percent_yes": 50.5, "percent_no": 49.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "Safety: Fire", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.082373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.960908", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 148 enacting a special tax to fund the continuation of Fire Station 60 and to fund fire protection services in the City of Canyon Lake be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5586, "fingerprint": "2013|201300073|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300073|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "60f5934019e4cfe3", "measure_id": "201300073", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(Advisory) Should the area of Canyon Lake commonly known as Goetz Hill be graded for retail development?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 610, "no_votes": 1914, "total_votes": 2524, "percent_yes": 24.2, "percent_no": 75.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.082642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.961090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Advisory) Should the area of Canyon Lake commonly known as Goetz Hill be graded for retail development?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11383, "fingerprint": "2013|201300120|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300120|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "cc29d37ee2aedba3", "measure_id": "201300120", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Leticia Garcia be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3086, "no_votes": 1336, "total_votes": 4422, "percent_yes": 69.8, "percent_no": 30.200000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-07-16", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.978977", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.086232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.963198", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Leticia Garcia be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5592, "fingerprint": "2013|201300078|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300078|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ebb3a09442983155", "measure_id": "201300078", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Council Member Wendy J. McCammack be recalled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1460, "no_votes": 1033, "total_votes": 2493, "percent_yes": 58.6, "percent_no": 41.4, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.084536", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.962271", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Council Member Wendy J. McCammack be recalled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11384, "fingerprint": "2013|201300121|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300121|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "eb5161760981d093", "measure_id": "201300121", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Sophia Green be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3071, "no_votes": 1278, "total_votes": 4349, "percent_yes": 70.6, "percent_no": 29.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-07-16", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.979178", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.086556", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.963377", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sophia Green be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5593, "fingerprint": "2013|201300079|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300079|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "694642153186c290", "measure_id": "201300079", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Attorney James F. Penman be recalled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7730, "no_votes": 5013, "total_votes": 12743, "percent_yes": 60.7, "percent_no": 39.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.084840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.962456", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Attorney James F. Penman be recalled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5594, "fingerprint": "2013|201300080|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300080|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "96898826e1baa6ef", "measure_id": "201300080", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Council Member John Valdivia be recalled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 426, "no_votes": 705, "total_votes": 1131, "percent_yes": 37.7, "percent_no": 62.3, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Governance: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.085108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.962640", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Council Member John Valdivia be recalled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5588, "fingerprint": "2013|201300008|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300008|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "12a4b7cfba54cc70", "measure_id": "201300008", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall County Service Area 68 (Valley of the Moon), Zone R-1 be authorized to levy an annual special tax in an amount not to exceed $125.00 with a 2.5% cost of living increase to provide road paving and related road services commencing on July 1, 2013, and continuing each year thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35, "no_votes": 24, "total_votes": 59, "percent_yes": 59.3, "percent_no": 40.7, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Transport: Roads", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-18", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.083280", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.961538", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall County Service Area 68 (Valley of the Moon), Zone R-1 be authorized to levy an annual special tax in an amount not to exceed $125.00 with a 2.5% cost of living increase to provide road paving and related road services commencing on July 1, 2013, and continuing each year thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5590, "fingerprint": "2013|201300076|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300076|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b2af9935ed43ea49", "measure_id": "201300076", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 6.48 acres of vacant land from General Commercial to Residential RD8 and of 5.31 acres of vacant land from Office Commercial to Residential RD8, generally located at the southeast corner of Riverside Drive and Fern Avenue, for a maximum of 94 single-family dwelling units?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1885, "no_votes": 817, "total_votes": 2702, "percent_yes": 69.8, "percent_no": 30.200000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.083867", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.961896", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 6.48 acres of vacant land from General Commercial to Residential RD8 and of 5.31 acres of vacant land from Office Commercial to Residential RD8, generally located at the southeast corner of Riverside Drive and Fern Avenue, for a maximum of 94 single-family dwelling units?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5591, "fingerprint": "2013|201300077|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300077|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f84f4a303930fcf2", "measure_id": "201300077", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure Grand Terrace has the funds necessary to remain an independent city and able to provide essential services to residents including rapid response to 9-1-1 police emergencies, maintenance/repair of local streets, adequate police services, and maintaining parks and public facilities, shall the City of Grand Terrace establish a utility users\u2019 tax of 5% for six years only with independent citizen oversight, all money  staying local, and an exemption for low-income seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 932, "no_votes": 1432, "total_votes": 2364, "percent_yes": 39.4, "percent_no": 60.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.084217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.962082", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure Grand Terrace has the funds necessary to remain an independent city and able to provide essential services to residents including rapid response to 9-1-1 police emergencies, maintenance/repair of local streets, adequate police services, and maintaining parks and public facilities, shall the City of Grand Terrace establish a utility users\u2019 tax of 5% for six years only with independent citizen oversight, all money  staying local, and an exemption for low-income seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5595, "fingerprint": "2013|201300081|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300081|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ccf3372fc973e21b", "measure_id": "201300081", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a General Plan Amendment be adopted, and shall Chapter 9.40 be repealed and Chapter 9.41 be added to the Town Development Code to enact the \u201cDale Evans Parkway Commercial Specific Plan\u201d in order to allow a proposed commercial development in the Town of Apple Valley located on approximately 30 acres of undeveloped property north of Happy Trails Highway (SR-18), at the southeasterly corner of the intersection of Dale Evans Parkway and Thunderbird Road?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6230, "no_votes": 4403, "total_votes": 10633, "percent_yes": 58.6, "percent_no": 41.4, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-19", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.085382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.962820", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a General Plan Amendment be adopted, and shall Chapter 9.40 be repealed and Chapter 9.41 be added to the Town Development Code to enact the \u201cDale Evans Parkway Commercial Specific Plan\u201d in order to allow a proposed commercial development in the Town of Apple Valley located on approximately 30 acres of undeveloped property north of Happy Trails Highway (SR-18), at the southeasterly corner of the intersection of Dale Evans Parkway and Thunderbird Road?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5589, "fingerprint": "2013|201300075|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300075|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4af52f2306addeec", "measure_id": "201300075", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance to Continue the Utility User Tax for five years be Adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3050, "no_votes": 1803, "total_votes": 4853, "percent_yes": 62.8, "percent_no": 37.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.083597", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.961717", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance to Continue the Utility User Tax for five years be Adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5596, "fingerprint": "2013|201300119|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300119|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c768ceff77b0a5e3", "measure_id": "201300119", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Community Facilities District No. 2013-1 (\"CFD No.2013-1\") of the Hesperia Unified School District (\"School District\") be authorized to finance the cost of public school facilities, as described in Resolution No. 2012/13-27 of the School District, by incurring bonded indebtedness in a maximum amount of $2,750,000, and shall CFD No. 2013-1 be authorized to levy special taxes on an annual basis, as shall be applicable, on property within CFD No. 2013-1, as set forth in Resolution Nos. 2012/13-21, as amended by Resolution No. 2012/13-26 and Resolution No. 2012/13-27, to pay for public school facilities and to pay for bonded indebtedness authorized under the Proposition (Measure Y), and for each year, commending with fiscal year 2013-2014, shall an appropriations limit, as defined by Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, be established for CFD No. 2013-1 in an amount equal to $2,750,000, as periodically adjusted pursuant to applicable State law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 176, "no_votes": 11, "total_votes": 187, "percent_yes": 94.1, "percent_no": 5.900000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education: Bonds", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-11", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.085656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.963015", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Community Facilities District No. 2013-1 (\"CFD No.2013-1\") of the Hesperia Unified School District (\"School District\") be authorized to finance the cost of public school facilities, as described in Resolution No. 2012/13-27 of the School District, by incurring bonded indebtedness in a maximum amount of $2,750,000, and shall CFD No. 2013-1 be authorized to levy special taxes on an annual basis, as shall be applicable, on property within CFD No. 2013-1, as set forth in Resolution Nos. 2012/13-21, as amended by Resolution No. 2012/13-26 and Resolution No. 2012/13-27, to pay for public school facilities and to pay for bonded indebtedness authorized under the Proposition (Measure Y), and for each year, commending with fiscal year 2013-2014, shall an appropriations limit, as defined by Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, be established for CFD No. 2013-1 in an amount equal to $2,750,000, as periodically adjusted pursuant to applicable State law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5597, "fingerprint": "2013|201300082|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300082|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c927320b712fcea0", "measure_id": "201300082", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the people of Encinitas adopt an initiative measure, known as \"The Encinitas Right to Vote Amendment\" to require voter approval, by a majority vote of the electorate, for a major amendment to a planning policy document (defined to mean the Land Use Element of the General Plan, Land Use Policy Maps of the General Plan, Zoning Code, Zoning Map, any specific plan, and development agreements) and to impose a citywide height limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6675, "no_votes": 6198, "total_votes": 12873, "percent_yes": 51.9, "percent_no": 48.1, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Voter Approval", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-18", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.086851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.963584", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the people of Encinitas adopt an initiative measure, known as \"The Encinitas Right to Vote Amendment\" to require voter approval, by a majority vote of the electorate, for a major amendment to a planning policy document (defined to mean the Land Use Element of the General Plan, Land Use Policy Maps of the General Plan, Zoning Code, Zoning Map, any specific plan, and development agreements) and to impose a citywide height limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5598, "fingerprint": "2013|201300009|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300009|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9642e5d82dd44725", "measure_id": "201300009", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City change its Charter to allow payments from the Retiree Health  Care Trust Fund only when the Trust Fund is fully funded or only under specified circumstances?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82426, "no_votes": 38367, "total_votes": 120793, "percent_yes": 68.2, "percent_no": 31.799999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Budget Processes", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.087277", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.963771", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City change its Charter to allow payments from the Retiree Health  Care Trust Fund only when the Trust Fund is fully funded or only under specified circumstances?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5599, "fingerprint": "2013|201300010|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300010|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "e82c4a3be8947a68", "measure_id": "201300010", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City allow a development project at the 8 Washington Street Site that would include new housing, retail and recreational facilities, and open space, and would increase the legal building height limits on a portion of the Site?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 79738, "no_votes": 47257, "total_votes": 126995, "percent_yes": 62.8, "percent_no": 37.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.087588", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.963953", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City allow a development project at the 8 Washington Street Site that would include new housing, retail and recreational facilities, and open space, and would increase the legal building height limits on a portion of the Site?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5600, "fingerprint": "2013|201300011|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300011|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "637b8d21c1d8ba24", "measure_id": "201300011", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City ordinance increasing legal building height limits on an approximately half-acre portion of the 8 Washington Street Site along Drumm Street take effect?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84083, "no_votes": 41497, "total_votes": 125580, "percent_yes": 67.0, "percent_no": 33.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.087878", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.964132", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City ordinance increasing legal building height limits on an approximately half-acre portion of the 8 Washington Street Site along Drumm Street take effect?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5601, "fingerprint": "2013|201300012|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300012|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6f00982e864a75bf", "measure_id": "201300012", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall it be City policy to use all available opportunities to reduce the City\u2019s cost of prescription drugs and to ask state and federal representatives to sponsor legislation to reduce drug prices paid by the government?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97804, "no_votes": 24690, "total_votes": 122494, "percent_yes": 79.80000000000001, "percent_no": 20.19999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": "Other", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.088155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.964312", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall it be City policy to use all available opportunities to reduce the City\u2019s cost of prescription drugs and to ask state and federal representatives to sponsor legislation to reduce drug prices paid by the government?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5602, "fingerprint": "2013|201300083|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300083|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "d16e8f9418b63e46", "measure_id": "201300083", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To pay for law enforcement and crime prevention services such as those described in Stockton\u2019s Marshall Plan on Crime, to help end the bankruptcy and restore other City services; and provided it shall sunset in ten years or when economic recovery occurs, a Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee reports on the use of proceeds, and independent audits are done annually; shall Ordinance 2013-07-09-1601 be adopted to impose a 3/4-cent transaction and use (sales) tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14939, "no_votes": 13869, "total_votes": 28808, "percent_yes": 51.9, "percent_no": 48.1, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.088643", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.964502", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To pay for law enforcement and crime prevention services such as those described in Stockton\u2019s Marshall Plan on Crime, to help end the bankruptcy and restore other City services; and provided it shall sunset in ten years or when economic recovery occurs, a Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee reports on the use of proceeds, and independent audits are done annually; shall Ordinance 2013-07-09-1601 be adopted to impose a 3/4-cent transaction and use (sales) tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5603, "fingerprint": "2013|201300084|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300084|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "5c6ec8f4d9fc0e51", "measure_id": "201300084", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If Measure A is approved by the voters, shall (i) 65% of its proceeds be used only to pay for law enforcement and crime prevention services in the City such as those described in the City\u2019s Marshall Plan on Crime and (ii) 35% of its proceeds be used only to pay for the City\u2019s efforts to end the bankruptcy and for services to residents, businesses, and property owners?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16776, "no_votes": 11530, "total_votes": 28306, "percent_yes": 59.3, "percent_no": 40.7, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Governance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.089069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.964692", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If Measure A is approved by the voters, shall (i) 65% of its proceeds be used only to pay for law enforcement and crime prevention services in the City such as those described in the City\u2019s Marshall Plan on Crime and (ii) 35% of its proceeds be used only to pay for the City\u2019s efforts to end the bankruptcy and for services to residents, businesses, and property owners?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5609, "fingerprint": "2013|201300122|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300122|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "23e5c737a3ae6ec2", "measure_id": "201300122", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District continue a successful local parcel tax to improve access to technology in classrooms, provide enrichment opportunities for students, quality professional development for teachers and increase student achievement, in the amount of $100 per year per taxable parcel for seven years, with exemptions for contiguous parcels and parcels owned by persons 65 years and older, with funds staying in local schools, and with independent community review of all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 433, "no_votes": 207, "total_votes": 640, "percent_yes": 67.7, "percent_no": 32.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.090765", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.967009", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District continue a successful local parcel tax to improve access to technology in classrooms, provide enrichment opportunities for students, quality professional development for teachers and increase student achievement, in the amount of $100 per year per taxable parcel for seven years, with exemptions for contiguous parcels and parcels owned by persons 65 years and older, with funds staying in local schools, and with independent community review of all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5610, "fingerprint": "2013|201300123|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300123|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "307abcea014de01b", "measure_id": "201300123", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education in local elementary/middle schools, with funds that cannot be taken by the State and - maintain quality science, math, reading/writing instruction, - retain qualified/experienced teacher, - minimize class size increases, - support music/art programs, - develop advanced programs in engineering/technology, shall Portola Valley Elementary School District extend expiring school parcel taxes for eight years, increase rates by $123 annually, with senior exemptions independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1512, "no_votes": 678, "total_votes": 2190, "percent_yes": 69.0, "percent_no": 31.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.091034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.967355", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education in local elementary/middle schools, with funds that cannot be taken by the State and - maintain quality science, math, reading/writing instruction, - retain qualified/experienced teacher, - minimize class size increases, - support music/art programs, - develop advanced programs in engineering/technology, shall Portola Valley Elementary School District extend expiring school parcel taxes for eight years, increase rates by $123 annually, with senior exemptions independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5614, "fingerprint": "2013|201300127|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300127|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "310a57baa3f51265", "measure_id": "201300127", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local schools and protect high quality math, science, reading and writing instruction with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District upgrade classrooms, science labs, and libraries, relieve school overcrowding, update classroom technology for higher 21 st century academic standards, and repair, construct, or acquire equipment, classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $130,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8002, "no_votes": 9195, "total_votes": 17197, "percent_yes": 46.5, "percent_no": 53.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education: Bonds", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.092292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.968785", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local schools and protect high quality math, science, reading and writing instruction with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District upgrade classrooms, science labs, and libraries, relieve school overcrowding, update classroom technology for higher 21 st century academic standards, and repair, construct, or acquire equipment, classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $130,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5608, "fingerprint": "2013|201300089|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300089|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "3bbf955549fa56eb", "measure_id": "201300089", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do the People of the Town of Portola Valley adopt an ordinance that continues the reduction of the general purpose Utility Users Tax levied on telephone, gas, water and electricity, set forth in Chapter 3.32 of the Portola Valley Municipal Code, from 5.5% to 4.5% on the charges made for such utility services for a period of four years from July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2018?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1035, "no_votes": 165, "total_votes": 1200, "percent_yes": 86.3, "percent_no": 13.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Repeal/Reduction/Limit", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.090487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.966539", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do the People of the Town of Portola Valley adopt an ordinance that continues the reduction of the general purpose Utility Users Tax levied on telephone, gas, water and electricity, set forth in Chapter 3.32 of the Portola Valley Municipal Code, from 5.5% to 4.5% on the charges made for such utility services for a period of four years from July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2018?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5611, "fingerprint": "2013|201300124|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300124|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9710a607affadf62", "measure_id": "201300124", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing the current tax rate and to maintain excellent student achievement by protecting math, science, reading and writing programs, supporting school libraries, attracting and retaining qualified teachers, and maintaining a well-rounded curriculum, including music and art, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary School District renew its existing parcel taxes for ten years, with no funds for administrators' salaries, exempting senior citizens and requiring independent citizen oversight, generating funds that cannot be taken by the State to benefit local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5551, "no_votes": 2161, "total_votes": 7712, "percent_yes": 72.0, "percent_no": 28.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.091337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.967694", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the current tax rate and to maintain excellent student achievement by protecting math, science, reading and writing programs, supporting school libraries, attracting and retaining qualified teachers, and maintaining a well-rounded curriculum, including music and art, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary School District renew its existing parcel taxes for ten years, with no funds for administrators' salaries, exempting senior citizens and requiring independent citizen oversight, generating funds that cannot be taken by the State to benefit local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5612, "fingerprint": "2013|201300125|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300125|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b70e13b0f18fccc6", "measure_id": "201300125", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and improve aging schools to protect quality academic instruction with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, shall Las Lomitas Elementary School District build classrooms for increased student enrollment, update/replace aging classrooms to meet current health/safety codes, renovate heating/electrical systems to save money, support 21st century instructional technology, acquire, repair, construct sites, facilities, equipment by issuing $60,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2305, "no_votes": 812, "total_votes": 3117, "percent_yes": 73.9, "percent_no": 26.099999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education: Bonds", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.091663", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.968037", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and improve aging schools to protect quality academic instruction with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, shall Las Lomitas Elementary School District build classrooms for increased student enrollment, update/replace aging classrooms to meet current health/safety codes, renovate heating/electrical systems to save money, support 21st century instructional technology, acquire, repair, construct sites, facilities, equipment by issuing $60,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5605, "fingerprint": "2013|201300086|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300086|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2d829e9751df8626", "measure_id": "201300086", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City increase the annual business license tax for liquid storage facilities up to $115.28 per one thousand cubic feet of liquid storage capacity, and provide for an offset for sales tax revenue received?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 881, "no_votes": 262, "total_votes": 1143, "percent_yes": 77.10000000000001, "percent_no": 22.89999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.089626", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.965066", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To pay for general municipal expenses, shall the City increase the annual business license tax for liquid storage facilities up to $115.28 per one thousand cubic feet of liquid storage capacity, and provide for an offset for sales tax revenue received?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5606, "fingerprint": "2013|201300087|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300087|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "80ae025fdd8862b4", "measure_id": "201300087", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To pay for general city services enjoyed by all residents and businesses in Foster City, including services such as police, fire, parks, recreation, and repairing and maintaining the levee, lagoon, streets and other infrastructure, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the City's business license tax effective January 1, 2014?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3077, "no_votes": 1126, "total_votes": 4203, "percent_yes": 73.2, "percent_no": 26.799999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.089898", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.965266", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To pay for general city services enjoyed by all residents and businesses in Foster City, including services such as police, fire, parks, recreation, and repairing and maintaining the levee, lagoon, streets and other infrastructure, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the City's business license tax effective January 1, 2014?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5607, "fingerprint": "2013|201300088|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300088|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9c79d47a2f2882c0", "measure_id": "201300088", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without raising the current 6.5% rate, and to fund fire protection; emergency services; police protection; Meals on Wheels and other senior citizen services; street, sidewalk and pothole repair; and other essential services, shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City of Pacifica's Utility Users Tax adding telecommunications services, requiring equal treatment regardless of technology used, maintaining senior exemptions and adding independent citizens oversight, with all funds staying in Pacifica and no funds for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2575, "no_votes": 4970, "total_votes": 7545, "percent_yes": 34.1, "percent_no": 65.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.090165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.965909", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without raising the current 6.5% rate, and to fund fire protection; emergency services; police protection; Meals on Wheels and other senior citizen services; street, sidewalk and pothole repair; and other essential services, shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City of Pacifica's Utility Users Tax adding telecommunications services, requiring equal treatment regardless of technology used, maintaining senior exemptions and adding independent citizens oversight, with all funds staying in Pacifica and no funds for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5613, "fingerprint": "2013|201300126|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300126|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "41b363bca1b8e34b", "measure_id": "201300126", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high quality education, avoid student overcrowding at our existing schools as enrollment continues to increase, and renovate and expand educational facilities at the O'Connor Elementary School site planned to reopen in Menlo Park's Willows neighborhood, all as described in the Bond Project List, shall the Menlo Park City School District issue $23 million of bonds at legal interest rates, establish an independent citizens' oversight committee, perform annual audits, and use no bond money for teacher or administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4222, "no_votes": 1383, "total_votes": 5605, "percent_yes": 75.3, "percent_no": 24.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education: Bonds", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.092021", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.968401", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high quality education, avoid student overcrowding at our existing schools as enrollment continues to increase, and renovate and expand educational facilities at the O'Connor Elementary School site planned to reopen in Menlo Park's Willows neighborhood, all as described in the Bond Project List, shall the Menlo Park City School District issue $23 million of bonds at legal interest rates, establish an independent citizens' oversight committee, perform annual audits, and use no bond money for teacher or administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5604, "fingerprint": "2013|201300085|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300085|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ce04bc95960a1555", "measure_id": "201300085", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue providing funding to maintain neighborhood police patrols and the Town's ability to respond to emergencies, repairing and maintaining streets, and repairing and constructing storm drains, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue a Special Parcel Tax for four years and allowing for the expenditure of funds derived from such tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1466, "no_votes": 532, "total_votes": 1998, "percent_yes": 73.4, "percent_no": 26.599999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.089342", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.964885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue providing funding to maintain neighborhood police patrols and the Town's ability to respond to emergencies, repairing and maintaining streets, and repairing and constructing storm drains, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue a Special Parcel Tax for four years and allowing for the expenditure of funds derived from such tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11385, "fingerprint": "2013|201300128|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300128|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5d434d3d994d51f7", "measure_id": "201300128", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall 17 parcels located on Marty Road and Jensen Springs Road be transferred from the Lakeside Join Union School District (\u201cLakeside\u201d) in the Loma Prieta Joint Union School District (LPJUSD); transferring the designated attendance for elementary education (K-8) and the associated property tax revenue; relieving , then reapportioning the parcels\u2019 G.O. Bond obligations to remaining Lakeside parcels; relieving the $311 annual Lakeside parcel tax; and requiring an assessment of $150 annually for the LPJUSD parcel tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22, "no_votes": 174, "total_votes": 196, "percent_yes": 11.2, "percent_no": 88.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.983783", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.093808", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.970415", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall 17 parcels located on Marty Road and Jensen Springs Road be transferred from the Lakeside Join Union School District (\u201cLakeside\u201d) in the Loma Prieta Joint Union School District (LPJUSD); transferring the designated attendance for elementary education (K-8) and the associated property tax revenue; relieving , then reapportioning the parcels\u2019 G.O. Bond obligations to remaining Lakeside parcels; relieving the $311 annual Lakeside parcel tax; and requiring an assessment of $150 annually for the LPJUSD parcel tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5616, "fingerprint": "2013|201300091|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300091|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a252385b51d55f5a", "measure_id": "201300091", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help reduce the City\u2019s elections costs through consolidation with County and State elections, shall the Sunnyvale City Charter be amended to change the City\u2019s general municipal elections from odd numbered years to even numbered years, with the next general municipal election scheduled for 2016, and to provide a one time, one year extension to councilmember terms, and create a temporary one year mayoral term to enable the transition to even-numbered year elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13259, "no_votes": 5142, "total_votes": 18401, "percent_yes": 72.1, "percent_no": 27.900000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.092932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.969572", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help reduce the City\u2019s elections costs through consolidation with County and State elections, shall the Sunnyvale City Charter be amended to change the City\u2019s general municipal elections from odd numbered years to even numbered years, with the next general municipal election scheduled for 2016, and to provide a one time, one year extension to councilmember terms, and create a temporary one year mayoral term to enable the transition to even-numbered year elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11386, "fingerprint": "2013|201300129|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300129|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5f511a41f3230e05", "measure_id": "201300129", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing tax rates and to protect outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math, and science; retain highly-qualified teachers; keep classroom technology, science resources, books and instructional materials updated; and maintain art and music; shall the Los Gatos Union School District be authorized to renew its expiring annual education tax of $290 per parcel for eight years, with citizen oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, a senior citizen exemption, and all funds staying in Los Gatos schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6070, "no_votes": 1355, "total_votes": 7425, "percent_yes": 81.8, "percent_no": 18.200000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.983978", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.094302", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.970608", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing tax rates and to protect outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math, and science; retain highly-qualified teachers; keep classroom technology, science resources, books and instructional materials updated; and maintain art and music; shall the Los Gatos Union School District be authorized to renew its expiring annual education tax of $290 per parcel for eight years, with citizen oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, a senior citizen exemption, and all funds staying in Los Gatos schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5617, "fingerprint": "2013|201300092|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300092|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "072403511eba6b7c", "measure_id": "201300092", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Sunnyvale Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax rate (commonly called \u201chotel tax\u201d) charged to persons who occupy hotel or motel rooms in the City for 30 days or less from 9.5% to 10.5% in order to help maintain the City\u2019s ability to fund basic services such as public safety and streets, trees, and sidewalk maintenance, and to keep parity with neighboring cities\u2019 hotel tax rates, effective January, 2014?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12657, "no_votes": 5799, "total_votes": 18456, "percent_yes": 68.60000000000001, "percent_no": 31.39999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.093209", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.970008", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sunnyvale Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax rate (commonly called \u201chotel tax\u201d) charged to persons who occupy hotel or motel rooms in the City for 30 days or less from 9.5% to 10.5% in order to help maintain the City\u2019s ability to fund basic services such as public safety and streets, trees, and sidewalk maintenance, and to keep parity with neighboring cities\u2019 hotel tax rates, effective January, 2014?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5618, "fingerprint": "2013|201300093|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300093|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0d9f0096d94f267c", "measure_id": "201300093", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Sunnyvale adopt a gun safety ordinance to require: 1) reporting to police, within 48 hours, known loss or theft of a firearm; 2) storing firearms in residences in a locked container or disabling them with a trigger lock when not in the owner\u2019s immediate possession; 3) prohibiting the possession of ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds, with certain exceptions; and 4) logging and tracking of ammunition sales within the City of Sunnyvale?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12404, "no_votes": 6235, "total_votes": 18639, "percent_yes": 66.5, "percent_no": 33.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Safety: Firearms", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.093515", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.970216", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Sunnyvale adopt a gun safety ordinance to require: 1) reporting to police, within 48 hours, known loss or theft of a firearm; 2) storing firearms in residences in a locked container or disabling them with a trigger lock when not in the owner\u2019s immediate possession; 3) prohibiting the possession of ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds, with certain exceptions; and 4) logging and tracking of ammunition sales within the City of Sunnyvale?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5615, "fingerprint": "2013|201300090|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300090|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "178a762aa816526e", "measure_id": "201300090", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Palo Alto Municipal Code be amended to rezone the property located at 567-595 Maybell Avenue from R-2 Low Density Residential and RM-15 Multiple Family Residential to Planned Community Overlay Zone to include 12 single family units and 60 units of affordable senior housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6538, "no_votes": 8476, "total_votes": 15014, "percent_yes": 43.5, "percent_no": 56.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.092618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.969186", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Palo Alto Municipal Code be amended to rezone the property located at 567-595 Maybell Avenue from R-2 Low Density Residential and RM-15 Multiple Family Residential to Planned Community Overlay Zone to include 12 single family units and 60 units of affordable senior housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5619, "fingerprint": "2013|201300130|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300130|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "759e00d08f6bb3b8", "measure_id": "201300130", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support quality education in local high schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State including academic instruction in science, math, English, Advanced Placement, art, music, technology, vocational courses; recruit/retain qualified teachers; maintain small class sizes; and provide safe/clean schools; shall Campbell Union High School District renew \u2013 with no tax increase \u2013 an existing $85 annual parcel tax for 8 years, with exemptions for seniors and qualified disabled citizens, independent fiscal oversight, and no administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19341, "no_votes": 5857, "total_votes": 25198, "percent_yes": 76.8, "percent_no": 23.200000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.094585", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.970792", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support quality education in local high schools with funds that cannot be taken by the State including academic instruction in science, math, English, Advanced Placement, art, music, technology, vocational courses; recruit/retain qualified teachers; maintain small class sizes; and provide safe/clean schools; shall Campbell Union High School District renew \u2013 with no tax increase \u2013 an existing $85 annual parcel tax for 8 years, with exemptions for seniors and qualified disabled citizens, independent fiscal oversight, and no administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5621, "fingerprint": "2013|201300132|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300132|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "09ae50c81ccb3224", "measure_id": "201300132", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue critical renovation, modernization and safety needs at the district\u2019s schools and to make needed upgrades to classrooms, libraries, science and computer labs, improve student access to computers and instructional technology and continue to improve the energy efficiency of classrooms and buildings, shall the Sunnyvale School District issue $96,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with funds monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee and no funds spent on administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6995, "no_votes": 3225, "total_votes": 10220, "percent_yes": 68.4, "percent_no": 31.599999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": "Education: Bonds", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.095208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.971171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue critical renovation, modernization and safety needs at the district\u2019s schools and to make needed upgrades to classrooms, libraries, science and computer labs, improve student access to computers and instructional technology and continue to improve the energy efficiency of classrooms and buildings, shall the Sunnyvale School District issue $96,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with funds monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee and no funds spent on administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5620, "fingerprint": "2013|201300131|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300131|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1cb8b13d448d8c2e", "measure_id": "201300131", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high academic achievement for local students and provide stable local funding to maintain outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math, and science, retain highly qualified and experienced teachers, and prepare students for an excellent high school shall the Loma Priesta Joint Union Elementary School District authorized an annual school parcel tax of $164 per parcel for seven years with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, an exemption for seniors, no funds for administrator\u2019s salaries and every dollar staying in our schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 241, "no_votes": 70, "total_votes": 311, "percent_yes": 77.5, "percent_no": 22.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.094930", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.970983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high academic achievement for local students and provide stable local funding to maintain outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math, and science, retain highly qualified and experienced teachers, and prepare students for an excellent high school shall the Loma Priesta Joint Union Elementary School District authorized an annual school parcel tax of $164 per parcel for seven years with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, an exemption for seniors, no funds for administrator\u2019s salaries and every dollar staying in our schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5624, "fingerprint": "2013|201300133|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300133|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "6a537f9f5a55a92e", "measure_id": "201300133", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall 17 parcels located on Marty Road and Jensen Springs Road be transferred from the Lakeside Joint Union School District (\u201cLakeside\u201d) into the Loma Prieta Joint Union School District (LPJUSD); transferring the designated attendance for elementary education (K-8) and the associated property tax revenue; relieving, then reapportioning the parcels\u2019 G.O. Bond obligations to remaining Lakeside parcels; relieving the $311 annual Lakeside parcel tax; and requiring an assessment of $150 annually for the LPJUSD parcel tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 81, "no_votes": 381, "total_votes": 462, "percent_yes": 17.5, "percent_no": 82.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Education: Districts", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.096053", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.971733", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall 17 parcels located on Marty Road and Jensen Springs Road be transferred from the Lakeside Joint Union School District (\u201cLakeside\u201d) into the Loma Prieta Joint Union School District (LPJUSD); transferring the designated attendance for elementary education (K-8) and the associated property tax revenue; relieving, then reapportioning the parcels\u2019 G.O. Bond obligations to remaining Lakeside parcels; relieving the $311 annual Lakeside parcel tax; and requiring an assessment of $150 annually for the LPJUSD parcel tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5625, "fingerprint": "2013|201300135|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300135|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "96ae3aca94277b1e", "measure_id": "201300135", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high academic achievement for local students and provide stable local funding to maintain outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math, and science, retain highly qualified and experienced teachers, and prepare students for an excellent high school shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District authorize an annual school parcel tax of $164 per parcel for seven years with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, an exemption for seniors, no funds for administrator\u2019s salaries and every dollar staying in our schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 983, "no_votes": 319, "total_votes": 1302, "percent_yes": 75.5, "percent_no": 24.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.096330", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.971921", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high academic achievement for local students and provide stable local funding to maintain outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math, and science, retain highly qualified and experienced teachers, and prepare students for an excellent high school shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District authorize an annual school parcel tax of $164 per parcel for seven years with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, an exemption for seniors, no funds for administrator\u2019s salaries and every dollar staying in our schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5626, "fingerprint": "2013|201300134|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300134|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "b4d62fc1a3767cc2", "measure_id": "201300134", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide stable funding for New Brighton Middle, Main Street, Opal Cliffs, Santa Cruz Gardens and Soquel Elementary for academic programs in reading, writing, math and science, attracting and retaining quality teachers, smaller class sizes, school libraries/librarians, maintaining art and music programs, shall Soquel Union Elementary School District levy an education tax of $90 per parcel for eight years with citizen oversight, exempting senior citizens, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4116, "no_votes": 2648, "total_votes": 6764, "percent_yes": 60.9, "percent_no": 39.1, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": "Education", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-05-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.096660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.972113", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide stable funding for New Brighton Middle, Main Street, Opal Cliffs, Santa Cruz Gardens and Soquel Elementary for academic programs in reading, writing, math and science, attracting and retaining quality teachers, smaller class sizes, school libraries/librarians, maintaining art and music programs, shall Soquel Union Elementary School District levy an education tax of $90 per parcel for eight years with citizen oversight, exempting senior citizens, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5622, "fingerprint": "2013|201300094|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300094|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "1864685247a3a753", "measure_id": "201300094", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Watsonville amend its Urban Limit Line to allow for the possible annexation of approximately 95 acres of agricultural land to the City limits for future economic development and jobs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1064, "no_votes": 3345, "total_votes": 4409, "percent_yes": 24.1, "percent_no": 75.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Zoning", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-06-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.095477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.971361", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Watsonville amend its Urban Limit Line to allow for the possible annexation of approximately 95 acres of agricultural land to the City limits for future economic development and jobs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5623, "fingerprint": "2013|201300095|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300095|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "4b8487073b39c377", "measure_id": "201300095", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a temporary one-half of one percent sales tax rate increase be approved for an eight year period to keep the budget balanced and to preserve police, parks, recreation and other city services for the residents of Scotts Valley?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2029, "no_votes": 667, "total_votes": 2696, "percent_yes": 75.3, "percent_no": 24.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.095778", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.971543", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a temporary one-half of one percent sales tax rate increase be approved for an eight year period to keep the budget balanced and to preserve police, parks, recreation and other city services for the residents of Scotts Valley?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5627, "fingerprint": "2013|201300096|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300096|SOLANO", "content_hash": "0b006ad5e3c19242", "measure_id": "201300096", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter sections 302, 319, and 1000 be amended to change the City's general municipal elections from odd-numbered to even-numbered years to consolidate with Statewide elections and reduce election costs by approximately $205,000 and to extend the term of the existing council members and mayor approximately 13  months to make that transition, and change the date elected candidates and the vice mayor assume office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10520, "no_votes": 3151, "total_votes": 13671, "percent_yes": 77.0, "percent_no": 23.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": "Governance: Elections", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.096933", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.972302", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter sections 302, 319, and 1000 be amended to change the City's general municipal elections from odd-numbered to even-numbered years to consolidate with Statewide elections and reduce election costs by approximately $205,000 and to extend the term of the existing council members and mayor approximately 13  months to make that transition, and change the date elected candidates and the vice mayor assume office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5628, "fingerprint": "2013|201300097|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300097|SONOMA", "content_hash": "865865879c174f57", "measure_id": "201300097", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the safely and character of Rohnert Park, and maintain/protect general City services, including 9-1-1 emergency response; fire protection, neighborhood police patrols; gang/sex offender enforcement; disaster preparedness; street paving/pothole repair; park maintenance; and other essential services, shall the City of Rohnert Park continue a voter-approved \u00bd cent sales tax, subject to annual audits and public review, keeping money from Sacramento, and without raising existing tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4187, "no_votes": 2033, "total_votes": 6220, "percent_yes": 67.30000000000001, "percent_no": 32.69999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.097243", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.972490", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the safely and character of Rohnert Park, and maintain/protect general City services, including 9-1-1 emergency response; fire protection, neighborhood police patrols; gang/sex offender enforcement; disaster preparedness; street paving/pothole repair; park maintenance; and other essential services, shall the City of Rohnert Park continue a voter-approved \u00bd cent sales tax, subject to annual audits and public review, keeping money from Sacramento, and without raising existing tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5629, "fingerprint": "2013|201300098|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300098|SONOMA", "content_hash": "baa8556707c242d7", "measure_id": "201300098", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Hotel Limitation Measure be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1908, "no_votes": 2032, "total_votes": 3940, "percent_yes": 48.4, "percent_no": 51.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "Land Use: Growth Cap/Boundary", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-19", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.097512", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.972685", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Hotel Limitation Measure be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5630, "fingerprint": "2013|201300099|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300099|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "c7368a5155cce463", "measure_id": "201300099", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City provide sewer service to the following area of the Modesto General Plan? The unincorporated area designated \"Airport Neighborhood\" or the east portion of \u201cArea 12\" in Modesto's 2009 Urban Growth Review. The area is generally bordered by Hyde Street on the north, Conejo Avenue on the east, Oregon Drive on the south, and Santa Rosa Avenue on the west.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15718, "no_votes": 7255, "total_votes": 22973, "percent_yes": 68.4, "percent_no": 31.599999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Wastewater/Sewage", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.097819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.972867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City provide sewer service to the following area of the Modesto General Plan? The unincorporated area designated \"Airport Neighborhood\" or the east portion of \u201cArea 12\" in Modesto's 2009 Urban Growth Review. The area is generally bordered by Hyde Street on the north, Conejo Avenue on the east, Oregon Drive on the south, and Santa Rosa Avenue on the west.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5632, "fingerprint": "2013|201300101|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300101|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "175be1ce4e03b5ea", "measure_id": "201300101", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the city of Waterford be allowed to levy a special tax every year within Community Facilities District No. 2013-1 (Public Services) to pay for landscape and lighting services and replace the Lighting and Landscaping Districts which are running deficits, according to the rates established by the city Council in Resolution of Formation, beginning July 1, 2014, and shall the City be authorized to spend for these services all that is receives?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 275, "no_votes": 668, "total_votes": 943, "percent_yes": 29.2, "percent_no": 70.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": "General Services: Maintenance", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.098415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.973251", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city of Waterford be allowed to levy a special tax every year within Community Facilities District No. 2013-1 (Public Services) to pay for landscape and lighting services and replace the Lighting and Landscaping Districts which are running deficits, according to the rates established by the city Council in Resolution of Formation, beginning July 1, 2014, and shall the City be authorized to spend for these services all that is receives?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5631, "fingerprint": "2013|201300100|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300100|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "c3f5ca7a9498d6ce", "measure_id": "201300100", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address crime, gangs, drugs and youth violence, improve the local economy/jobs, and maintain/improve essential City services, including: Police/Fire Protection; Neighborhood Police Patrols; 9-1-1 Emergency Response; Gang Crime, Theft and Burglary Prevention; Street/Pothole Repair; Programs Attracting Businesses/Creating Jobs; and Other City Services. Shall the City of Modesto enact a one-cent sales tax, for 6 years, with independent annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11815, "no_votes": 12322, "total_votes": 24137, "percent_yes": 48.9, "percent_no": 51.1, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": "Revenues: Tax Creation/Incr./Contin.", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-11-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.098095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.973060", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address crime, gangs, drugs and youth violence, improve the local economy/jobs, and maintain/improve essential City services, including: Police/Fire Protection; Neighborhood Police Patrols; 9-1-1 Emergency Response; Gang Crime, Theft and Burglary Prevention; Street/Pothole Repair; Programs Attracting Businesses/Creating Jobs; and Other City Services. Shall the City of Modesto enact a one-cent sales tax, for 6 years, with independent annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5633, "fingerprint": "2013|201300136|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300136|TULARE", "content_hash": "95338b135387ffca", "measure_id": "201300136", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Reynold Esquivel be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 69, "no_votes": 31, "total_votes": 100, "percent_yes": 69.0, "percent_no": 31.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.098682", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.973431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Reynold Esquivel be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5634, "fingerprint": "2013|201300137|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300137|TULARE", "content_hash": "60c1a66e2a5e8de7", "measure_id": "201300137", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Rebecca Quintana be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66, "no_votes": 34, "total_votes": 100, "percent_yes": 66.0, "percent_no": 34.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": "Education: Recall", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-04-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.098981", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.973613", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Rebecca Quintana be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5635, "fingerprint": "2013|201300102|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2013|201300102|YOLO", "content_hash": "5864acf96d51745f", "measure_id": "201300102", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2013, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2399 - be adopted, which grants permission to the City of Davis to proceed with the Davis Woodland Water Supply Project, to provide surface water as an additional supply of water, subject to the adoption of water rates in accordance with the California Constitution (Proposition 218)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8014, "no_votes": 6802, "total_votes": 14816, "percent_yes": 54.1, "percent_no": 45.9, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": "General Services: Water", "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2013-03-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.099253", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.973794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2399 - be adopted, which grants permission to the City of Davis to proceed with the Davis Woodland Water Supply Project, to provide surface water as an additional supply of water, subject to the adoption of water rates in accordance with the California Constitution (Proposition 218)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5642, "fingerprint": "2012|201200001|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200001|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "19740aca199f9512", "measure_id": "201200001", "measure_letter": "A1", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain/upgrade humane animal care and basic needs (food, medical, heating, cooling, safe enclosures); retain veterinarians/animal specialists; care for wounded/endangered animals; support wildlife conservation; maintain children's educational, nature/science programs, field trips; and keep entrance fees affordable; shall Alameda County levy a tax of $12/parcel annually for residential parcels and comparable commercial/industrial rates, with low-income senior exemptions, mandatory audits, and citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 340933, "no_votes": 200333, "total_votes": 541266, "percent_yes": 62.9881, "percent_no": 37.0119, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.101668", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.975079", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/upgrade humane animal care and basic needs (food, medical, heating, cooling, safe enclosures); retain veterinarians/animal specialists; care for wounded/endangered animals; support wildlife conservation; maintain children's educational, nature/science programs, field trips; and keep entrance fees affordable; shall Alameda County levy a tax of $12/parcel annually for residential parcels and comparable commercial/industrial rates, with low-income senior exemptions, mandatory audits, and citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5641, "fingerprint": "2012|201200328|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200328|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f64ed81dcfcb1706", "measure_id": "201200328", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide College of Alameda Laney College, Merritt College and Berkeley City College secure funds that cannot be taken by the state, and support affordable college education including: providing core academic programs including math, science and English; training students for successful careers; and educating students to transfer to university; shall Peralta Community College District levy $48 per parcel annually for 8 years with Citizens' Oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, and all funds spent in our college district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76044, "no_votes": 28324, "total_votes": 104368, "percent_yes": 72.8614, "percent_no": 27.138599999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.101345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.974894", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide College of Alameda Laney College, Merritt College and Berkeley City College secure funds that cannot be taken by the state, and support affordable college education including: providing core academic programs including math, science and English; training students for successful careers; and educating students to transfer to university; shall Peralta Community College District levy $48 per parcel annually for 8 years with Citizens' Oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, and all funds spent in our college district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11387, "fingerprint": "2012|201200002|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200002|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d7439a8922f7b443", "measure_id": "201200002", "measure_letter": "B1", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a new Transportation Expenditure Plan be implemented to address current and future transportation needs that: 1) Improves transit access to jobs and schools; 2) Fixes roads, improves highways and increases bicycle and pedestrian safety; 3) Reduces traffic congestion and improves air quality; 4) Keeps senior, youth, and disabled fares affordable. Approval extends the existing County sales tax and increases it by 1/2 cent, with independent oversight, local job creation programs. No money can be taken by the state.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 350899, "no_votes": 176504, "total_votes": 527403, "percent_yes": 66.5334, "percent_no": 33.4666, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.989001", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.102199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.975264", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a new Transportation Expenditure Plan be implemented to address current and future transportation needs that: 1) Improves transit access to jobs and schools; 2) Fixes roads, improves highways and increases bicycle and pedestrian safety; 3) Reduces traffic congestion and improves air quality; 4) Keeps senior, youth, and disabled fares affordable. Approval extends the existing County sales tax and increases it by 1/2 cent, with independent oversight, local job creation programs. No money can be taken by the state.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5637, "fingerprint": "2012|201200078|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200078|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7e0368f1e104c4f2", "measure_id": "201200078", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain neighborhood crime patrols, fire protection and 911 emergency response; improve earthquake preparedness; replace an unsafe fire station; establish a citywide Emergency Operations Center, a joint police/fire training facility, library, cultural and recreational facilities, shall the City of Alameda enact a one-half cent sales tax, with all revenue staying in the City, mandatory annual audits and public expenditure reports?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8616, "no_votes": 8426, "total_votes": 17042, "percent_yes": 50.5574, "percent_no": 49.4426, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.099986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.974161", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain neighborhood crime patrols, fire protection and 911 emergency response; improve earthquake preparedness; replace an unsafe fire station; establish a citywide Emergency Operations Center, a joint police/fire training facility, library, cultural and recreational facilities, shall the City of Alameda enact a one-half cent sales tax, with all revenue staying in the City, mandatory annual audits and public expenditure reports?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5643, "fingerprint": "2012|201200079|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200079|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "bc4c3d0ee85cba8e", "measure_id": "201200079", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended by amending Section 22-12 to eliminate language that allows the City Council to sell or dispose of public parks or any portion there of if a new public park is designated, which means the sale or disposal of public parks must be approved by the electors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23260, "no_votes": 6118, "total_votes": 29378, "percent_yes": 79.17490000000001, "percent_no": 20.825099999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.102514", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.975449", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended by amending Section 22-12 to eliminate language that allows the City Council to sell or dispose of public parks or any portion there of if a new public park is designated, which means the sale or disposal of public parks must be approved by the electors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5638, "fingerprint": "2012|201200325|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200325|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5ec12a39befc1ebc", "measure_id": "201200325", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Dublin Unified School District update/replace aging classrooms/science labs; provide 21st century computers/technology/classrooms; ensure classrooms meet safety codes; prevent student overcrowding; and improve energy/operational efficiency and utilize savings for teachers/instruction, by issuing $99 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying in Dublin?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4205, "no_votes": 2575, "total_votes": 6780, "percent_yes": 62.0206, "percent_no": 37.9794, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.100284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.974342", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Dublin Unified School District update/replace aging classrooms/science labs; provide 21st century computers/technology/classrooms; ensure classrooms meet safety codes; prevent student overcrowding; and improve energy/operational efficiency and utilize savings for teachers/instruction, by issuing $99 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying in Dublin?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5644, "fingerprint": "2012|201200080|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200080|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6d950c48566b470c", "measure_id": "201200080", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and provide city services and facilities, including: Fire and Police protection, safety, and emergency response Recreational programs, parks, playgrounds, and open space Senior and youth programs and facilities Community development and environmental preservation\r\nAnd other general city services and facilities,Shall the City of Albany enact a one-half cent sales tax, with annual independent audits, to end after eight years, with all funds spent only in Albany?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6237, "no_votes": 1571, "total_votes": 7808, "percent_yes": 79.8796, "percent_no": 20.120400000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.102817", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.975630", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and provide city services and facilities, including: Fire and Police protection, safety, and emergency response Recreational programs, parks, playgrounds, and open space Senior and youth programs and facilities Community development and environmental preservation\r\nAnd other general city services and facilities,Shall the City of Albany enact a one-half cent sales tax, with annual independent audits, to end after eight years, with all funds spent only in Albany?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5639, "fingerprint": "2012|201200326|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200326|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "87fa775da8bf550d", "measure_id": "201200326", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect critical education programs, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, including: math, reading, writing, and hands-on science classes/labs; enhancing library services, technology and college preparation programs; providing programs for all students to meet State academic standards; and attracting and retaining qualified teachers; shall Hayward Unified School District be authorized to levy $58 per parcel annually, for five years, with an exemption for senior citizens, mandatory citizens' oversight and all money used for classrooms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12736, "no_votes": 5245, "total_votes": 17981, "percent_yes": 70.83030000000001, "percent_no": 29.16969999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.100644", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.974525", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect critical education programs, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, including: math, reading, writing, and hands-on science classes/labs; enhancing library services, technology and college preparation programs; providing programs for all students to meet State academic standards; and attracting and retaining qualified teachers; shall Hayward Unified School District be authorized to levy $58 per parcel annually, for five years, with an exemption for senior citizens, mandatory citizens' oversight and all money used for classrooms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5640, "fingerprint": "2012|201200327|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200327|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7061b0b66b86d849", "measure_id": "201200327", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high-qaulity local elementary, middle and high school education to prepare students for college and careers with outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math and science and highly qualified teachers and classified staff, shall New Haven Unified School District authorize a school parcel tax of $180 per year, for four years, with citizen oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, an exemption available for seniors and the disabled, and all funds staying in our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6344, "no_votes": 3735, "total_votes": 10079, "percent_yes": 62.9428, "percent_no": 37.0572, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.101073", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.974712", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high-qaulity local elementary, middle and high school education to prepare students for college and careers with outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math and science and highly qualified teachers and classified staff, shall New Haven Unified School District authorize a school parcel tax of $180 per year, for four years, with citizen oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, an exemption available for seniors and the disabled, and all funds staying in our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5656, "fingerprint": "2012|201200330|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200330|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "4ad8f58e2544db26", "measure_id": "201200330", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of Oakland schools and school facilities to better prepare students for college and jobs, to upgrade science labs, classrooms, computers and technology, improve student safety and security, repair bathrooms, electrical systems, plumbing and sewer lines, improve energy efficiency and earthquake safety, shall the Oakland Unified School District be authorized to issue $475 million in bonds, with an independent citizens oversight committee and annual audits to guarantee funds are spent properly to benefit Oakland children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 122695, "no_votes": 22687, "total_votes": 145382, "percent_yes": 84.39489999999999, "percent_no": 15.605100000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.106771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.978266", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of Oakland schools and school facilities to better prepare students for college and jobs, to upgrade science labs, classrooms, computers and technology, improve student safety and security, repair bathrooms, electrical systems, plumbing and sewer lines, improve energy efficiency and earthquake safety, shall the Oakland Unified School District be authorized to issue $475 million in bonds, with an independent citizens oversight committee and annual audits to guarantee funds are spent properly to benefit Oakland children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5657, "fingerprint": "2012|201200331|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200331|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f93a961b257c53ba", "measure_id": "201200331", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the election of governing board members of the Ohlone Community College District, shall members residing in each trustee area be elected by the registered voters in that trustee area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53343, "no_votes": 19406, "total_votes": 72749, "percent_yes": 73.32469999999999, "percent_no": 26.675300000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.107049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.978449", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the election of governing board members of the Ohlone Community College District, shall members residing in each trustee area be elected by the registered voters in that trustee area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5659, "fingerprint": "2012|201200332|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200332|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "85f876c633acb481", "measure_id": "201200332", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe State budget cuts with emergency funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento; protect core academic math/science/reading programs and student safety; keep libraries open; retain quality teachers; maintain classroom computers, instructional technology, PE, art, music and class size; shall San Leandro Unified School District levy $39/year on single family homes and rates on commercial/other types of parcels, for five years, with annual audits, citizens oversight, senior exemptions, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14556, "no_votes": 7252, "total_votes": 21808, "percent_yes": 66.7461, "percent_no": 33.2539, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.107635", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.978815", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe State budget cuts with emergency funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento; protect core academic math/science/reading programs and student safety; keep libraries open; retain quality teachers; maintain classroom computers, instructional technology, PE, art, music and class size; shall San Leandro Unified School District levy $39/year on single family homes and rates on commercial/other types of parcels, for five years, with annual audits, citizens oversight, senior exemptions, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11389, "fingerprint": "2012|201200329|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200329|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ce0d285899dbe5cd", "measure_id": "201200329", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide Chabot and Las Positas Community Colleges funds that cannot be taken by the state, ensure affordable quality education, prepare students for university transfer, maintain job training in healthcare, technology, public safety, and other areas, uphold core academics, and preserve student support services, shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District levy $28 per parcel annually for six years with Citizens\u2019 Oversight, no money for permanent salaries, and all funds spent on local colleges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 130106, "no_votes": 78033, "total_votes": 208139, "percent_yes": 62.5092, "percent_no": 37.4908, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.991607", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.105952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.977705", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide Chabot and Las Positas Community Colleges funds that cannot be taken by the state, ensure affordable quality education, prepare students for university transfer, maintain job training in healthcare, technology, public safety, and other areas, uphold core academics, and preserve student support services, shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District levy $28 per parcel annually for six years with Citizens\u2019 Oversight, no money for permanent salaries, and all funds spent on local colleges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11388, "fingerprint": "2012|201200081|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200081|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8c34b19a7b1be50e", "measure_id": "201200081", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds not exceeding $30,000,000 for street improvements and integrated Green Infrastructure such as rain gardens, swales, bioretention cells and permeable paving, to improve roads, reduce flooding and improve water quality in the creeks and Bay?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37998, "no_votes": 13847, "total_votes": 51845, "percent_yes": 73.2915, "percent_no": 26.7085, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.989591", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.103085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.975817", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds not exceeding $30,000,000 for street improvements and integrated Green Infrastructure such as rain gardens, swales, bioretention cells and permeable paving, to improve roads, reduce flooding and improve water quality in the creeks and Bay?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5636, "fingerprint": "2012|201200077|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200077|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "51fb6e9ffa4c61d2", "measure_id": "201200077", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 20F be added to the Piedmont City Code providing for a new 10-year Special Municipal Sewer Surtax, as more specifically set forth in Ord. 699 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2000, "no_votes": 1949, "total_votes": 3949, "percent_yes": 50.645700000000005, "percent_no": 49.354299999999995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-02-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.099567", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.973979", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 20F be added to the Piedmont City Code providing for a new 10-year Special Municipal Sewer Surtax, as more specifically set forth in Ord. 699 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5645, "fingerprint": "2012|201200082|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200082|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "01829a8c275853b4", "measure_id": "201200082", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds not exceeding $19,400,000 to fund construction of replacement Warm and Willard pools, and renovation or replacement of associated facilities, as well as repair, renovation or replacement of locker rooms and associated facilities at the existing West Campus and King pools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31671, "no_votes": 19112, "total_votes": 50783, "percent_yes": 62.3654, "percent_no": 37.6346, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.103353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.976003", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds not exceeding $19,400,000 to fund construction of replacement Warm and Willard pools, and renovation or replacement of associated facilities, as well as repair, renovation or replacement of locker rooms and associated facilities at the existing West Campus and King pools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5646, "fingerprint": "2012|201200083|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200083|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "20197120732f20eb", "measure_id": "201200083", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special tax of $0.00779 per square foot of improvements on land in Berkeley be authorized to fund maintenance and operation of the replacement Warm Water and Willard Pools, if a bond measure funding construction of those pools is adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30191, "no_votes": 20129, "total_votes": 50320, "percent_yes": 59.998, "percent_no": 40.002, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.103629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.976190", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax of $0.00779 per square foot of improvements on land in Berkeley be authorized to fund maintenance and operation of the replacement Warm Water and Willard Pools, if a bond measure funding construction of those pools is adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5647, "fingerprint": "2012|201200084|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200084|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d1260bcd4d931dba", "measure_id": "201200084", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (which limits city expenditures) be increased to allow for the expenditure of taxes previously approved by the voters for parks maintenance; libraries; emergency medical services; emergency services for severely disabled persons; and fire protection and emergency response and preparedness, for fiscal years 2013 through 2016?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45318, "no_votes": 5555, "total_votes": 50873, "percent_yes": 89.08070000000001, "percent_no": 10.919299999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.103905", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.976371", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (which limits city expenditures) be increased to allow for the expenditure of taxes previously approved by the voters for parks maintenance; libraries; emergency medical services; emergency services for severely disabled persons; and fire protection and emergency response and preparedness, for fiscal years 2013 through 2016?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5648, "fingerprint": "2012|201200085|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200085|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "54bd0bace29a7e05", "measure_id": "201200085", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing the rate, shall an ordinance be adopted to update Berkeley\u2019s existing utility users tax, which funds police, fire and other essential City services, to keep current with changes in technology and Federal and State laws while maintaining exemptions for nonprofit educational organizations and hospitals, adding an exemption for low-income taxpayers, and requiring an annual verification and public report as to collection and expenditure of the tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42382, "no_votes": 7266, "total_votes": 49648, "percent_yes": 85.36500000000001, "percent_no": 14.634999999999991, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.104211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.976558", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the rate, shall an ordinance be adopted to update Berkeley\u2019s existing utility users tax, which funds police, fire and other essential City services, to keep current with changes in technology and Federal and State laws while maintaining exemptions for nonprofit educational organizations and hospitals, adding an exemption for low-income taxpayers, and requiring an annual verification and public report as to collection and expenditure of the tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5649, "fingerprint": "2012|201200086|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200086|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6551f35d95640a97", "measure_id": "201200086", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to provide that council district redistricting shall be adopted by ordinance and to require that districts be as equal in population as feasible taking into consideration topography, geography, cohesiveness, contiguity, integrity, compactness of territory and communities of interest, and have easily understood boundaries such as major traffic arteries and geographic boundaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31852, "no_votes": 16464, "total_votes": 48316, "percent_yes": 65.9243, "percent_no": 34.0757, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.104508", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.976750", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to provide that council district redistricting shall be adopted by ordinance and to require that districts be as equal in population as feasible taking into consideration topography, geography, cohesiveness, contiguity, integrity, compactness of territory and communities of interest, and have easily understood boundaries such as major traffic arteries and geographic boundaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5650, "fingerprint": "2012|201200087|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200087|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "76d527447eba5c4d", "measure_id": "201200087", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance prohibiting sitting on sidewalks in commercial districts from 7:00 am to 10:00 pm, with exceptions for: (a) medical emergencies; (b) wheelchairs and similar mobility devices; (c) bus benches; (d) street events; (e) other furniture placed on the sidewalk pursuant to a permit; requiring the City to ensure that it is applied in a constitutional manner and requiring a warning prior to citation, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25523, "no_votes": 27981, "total_votes": 53504, "percent_yes": 47.703, "percent_no": 52.297, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.104790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.976933", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance prohibiting sitting on sidewalks in commercial districts from 7:00 am to 10:00 pm, with exceptions for: (a) medical emergencies; (b) wheelchairs and similar mobility devices; (c) bus benches; (d) street events; (e) other furniture placed on the sidewalk pursuant to a permit; requiring the City to ensure that it is applied in a constitutional manner and requiring a warning prior to citation, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5651, "fingerprint": "2012|201200088|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200088|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b762dbd0916b6371", "measure_id": "201200088", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the West Berkeley Plan and the Zoning Ordinance be amended to allow development flexibility on up to 6 large sites, each under the same ownership, during the next 10 years, allowing a maximum height of 75\u2019 with a site-wide average height of 50\u2019, and only if community and environmental benefits are provided to West Berkeley?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24779, "no_votes": 25291, "total_votes": 50070, "percent_yes": 49.4887, "percent_no": 50.5113, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.105065", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.977120", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the West Berkeley Plan and the Zoning Ordinance be amended to allow development flexibility on up to 6 large sites, each under the same ownership, during the next 10 years, allowing a maximum height of 75\u2019 with a site-wide average height of 50\u2019, and only if community and environmental benefits are provided to West Berkeley?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5652, "fingerprint": "2012|201200089|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200089|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "00d02e050a6e6765", "measure_id": "201200089", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted: establishing new agenda and meeting requirements for the City\u2019s legislative bodies (Council, Rent Stabilization Board and all 36 commissions), including earlier agenda deadlines; increased disclosure requirements for public records; and creating a new commission with authority to take enforcement action against the City in case of violations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10509, "no_votes": 34651, "total_votes": 45160, "percent_yes": 23.2706, "percent_no": 76.7294, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.105340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.977312", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted: establishing new agenda and meeting requirements for the City\u2019s legislative bodies (Council, Rent Stabilization Board and all 36 commissions), including earlier agenda deadlines; increased disclosure requirements for public records; and creating a new commission with authority to take enforcement action against the City in case of violations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5653, "fingerprint": "2012|201200090|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200090|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "718d18594e24c914", "measure_id": "201200090", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance requiring the City to publish certified biennial reports of its 20-year financial obligations for employee/retiree expenses, capital assets, and \u201cproductive capacity of City services\u201d, the present value of those obligations, and the annual expenses needed to meet them, and prohibiting any new or increased debt financing, property-related fee, assessment or tax absent certification of the report by the City Manager or other, independent professional, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17292, "no_votes": 27511, "total_votes": 44803, "percent_yes": 38.595600000000005, "percent_no": 61.404399999999995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.105621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.977510", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance requiring the City to publish certified biennial reports of its 20-year financial obligations for employee/retiree expenses, capital assets, and \u201cproductive capacity of City services\u201d, the present value of those obligations, and the annual expenses needed to meet them, and prohibiting any new or increased debt financing, property-related fee, assessment or tax absent certification of the report by the City Manager or other, independent professional, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5654, "fingerprint": "2012|201200091|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200091|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7e6526265d22ecb3", "measure_id": "201200091", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City change its general municipal election date from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years and add an extra year to the term of the existing Council members and Mayor to make that change? Fiscal Impact: Saves approximately $250,000 per election starting with the next election in 2014.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25452, "no_votes": 7214, "total_votes": 32666, "percent_yes": 77.91590000000001, "percent_no": 22.084099999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.106226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.977894", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change its general municipal election date from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years and add an extra year to the term of the existing Council members and Mayor to make that change? Fiscal Impact: Saves approximately $250,000 per election starting with the next election in 2014.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5655, "fingerprint": "2012|201200092|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200092|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e47a9c17337cd59c", "measure_id": "201200092", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If the City\u2019s voters do not approve of an immediate change in Livermore\u2019s general municipal election date, shall the City change to even-numbered election years by adding a year to the terms of the incoming Council members and Mayor at the general municipal elections in 2013 and 2015? Fiscal Impact: Costs approximately $750,000 for transition elections, then saves approximately $250,000 per election, starting in 2018.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14476, "no_votes": 16431, "total_votes": 30907, "percent_yes": 46.8373, "percent_no": 53.1627, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.106498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.978078", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If the City\u2019s voters do not approve of an immediate change in Livermore\u2019s general municipal election date, shall the City change to even-numbered election years by adding a year to the terms of the incoming Council members and Mayor at the general municipal elections in 2013 and 2015? Fiscal Impact: Costs approximately $750,000 for transition elections, then saves approximately $250,000 per election, starting in 2018.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5658, "fingerprint": "2012|201200093|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200093|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8a99716692bdd75b", "measure_id": "201200093", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential police, fire, and paramedic service, to prevent the reduction in maintenance in City parks, greenspaces and other public areas, and to prevent the loss of youth, family, and senior recreational and safety services, shall the City of Piedmont continue to authorize a parcel tax, replacing the existing Municipal Services Tax, as is more specifically set forth in Ord. 707 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4549, "no_votes": 2108, "total_votes": 6657, "percent_yes": 68.33409999999999, "percent_no": 31.665900000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.107315", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.978630", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential police, fire, and paramedic service, to prevent the reduction in maintenance in City parks, greenspaces and other public areas, and to prevent the loss of youth, family, and senior recreational and safety services, shall the City of Piedmont continue to authorize a parcel tax, replacing the existing Municipal Services Tax, as is more specifically set forth in Ord. 707 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5660, "fingerprint": "2012|201200003|ALPINE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200003|ALPINE", "content_hash": "a64aaf7b1d42334a", "measure_id": "201200003", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Alpine", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County ordinance entitled The Fiscal Office Consolidation Act (consolidating the current elective offices of auditor, controller, treasure, and tax collector into a new appointive county office of director of finance) be approved and enacted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 440, "no_votes": 175, "total_votes": 615, "percent_yes": 71.5447, "percent_no": 28.455299999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.108038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.978998", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County ordinance entitled The Fiscal Office Consolidation Act (consolidating the current elective offices of auditor, controller, treasure, and tax collector into a new appointive county office of director of finance) be approved and enacted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alpine_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5661, "fingerprint": "2012|201200004|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200004|AMADOR", "content_hash": "d79a06d35e86466c", "measure_id": "201200004", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1723, which proposes to amend Amador County Code section 3.16.030 to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax from six percent (6%) to ten percent (10%) to be consistent with the 10% hotel tax collected by the cities of Jackson, Sutter Creek and Ione, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11333, "no_votes": 5170, "total_votes": 16503, "percent_yes": 68.6724, "percent_no": 31.327600000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.108308", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.979180", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1723, which proposes to amend Amador County Code section 3.16.030 to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax from six percent (6%) to ten percent (10%) to be consistent with the 10% hotel tax collected by the cities of Jackson, Sutter Creek and Ione, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5663, "fingerprint": "2012|201200095|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200095|AMADOR", "content_hash": "0e0bda095b06903a", "measure_id": "201200095", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Plymouth Ordinance No. 2012-03 increasing the transient occupancy tax to ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by hotel operators within the city limits, with tax revenues to be used for general municipal purposes, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 216, "no_votes": 154, "total_votes": 370, "percent_yes": 58.3784, "percent_no": 41.6216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.108907", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.979726", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Plymouth Ordinance No. 2012-03 increasing the transient occupancy tax to ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by hotel operators within the city limits, with tax revenues to be used for general municipal purposes, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5664, "fingerprint": "2012|201200094|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200094|AMADOR", "content_hash": "8445e7b356bbb4c5", "measure_id": "201200094", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should two percent (2%) of revenue from the increase in the transient occupancy tax be used for streets, parking and landscaping, and the remaining two percent (2%) for tourism including promotions, events, signage, advertising, and other related expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 239, "no_votes": 119, "total_votes": 358, "percent_yes": 66.7598, "percent_no": 33.2402, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.109174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.980184", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should two percent (2%) of revenue from the increase in the transient occupancy tax be used for streets, parking and landscaping, and the remaining two percent (2%) for tourism including promotions, events, signage, advertising, and other related expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5665, "fingerprint": "2012|201200096|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200096|AMADOR", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201200096", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 790, "no_votes": 499, "total_votes": 1289, "percent_yes": 61.2878, "percent_no": 38.7122, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.109454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.980408", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5662, "fingerprint": "2012|201200005|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200005|AMADOR", "content_hash": "c5691000ad38df76", "measure_id": "201200005", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the Amador County Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten-year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any\r\nsuccessor statutes thereto, for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11533, "no_votes": 5256, "total_votes": 16789, "percent_yes": 68.69380000000001, "percent_no": 31.30619999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.108576", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.979362", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Amador County Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten-year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any\r\nsuccessor statutes thereto, for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5666, "fingerprint": "2012|201200333|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200333|BUTTE", "content_hash": "591feceaa43c0486", "measure_id": "201200333", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, qualify for $3,600,000 State matching funds, fix leaky roofs, improve fire safety, repair/modernize classrooms, upgrade electrical and plumbing systems for energy efficiency, and update science and computer technology, shall Biggs Unified School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct and equip neighborhood schools, sites/facilities, with annual audits, citizens oversight, no money for administrators' salraies and all funds staying local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 360, "no_votes": 450, "total_votes": 810, "percent_yes": 44.4444, "percent_no": 55.5556, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.109724", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.980605", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, qualify for $3,600,000 State matching funds, fix leaky roofs, improve fire safety, repair/modernize classrooms, upgrade electrical and plumbing systems for energy efficiency, and update science and computer technology, shall Biggs Unified School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct and equip neighborhood schools, sites/facilities, with annual audits, citizens oversight, no money for administrators' salraies and all funds staying local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5668, "fingerprint": "2012|201200334|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200334|BUTTE", "content_hash": "d42a48bd4ca3a3cc", "measure_id": "201200334", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Gridley High School, repair leaky roofs, improve student access to computers and modern technology, construct a new gym and cafeteria, lower energy costs by upgrading electrical/plumbing/heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall Gridley Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities by issuing $11,000,000 of bonds at legal interest\r\nrates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and NO money for administrators\u2019 or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1147, "no_votes": 1031, "total_votes": 2178, "percent_yes": 52.663, "percent_no": 47.337, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.110277", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.980983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Gridley High School, repair leaky roofs, improve student access to computers and modern technology, construct a new gym and cafeteria, lower energy costs by upgrading electrical/plumbing/heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall Gridley Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities by issuing $11,000,000 of bonds at legal interest\r\nrates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and NO money for administrators\u2019 or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5669, "fingerprint": "2012|201200335|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200335|BUTTE", "content_hash": "ceb4b05284b4a673", "measure_id": "201200335", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local ELEMENTARY education, repair, upgrade outdated classrooms, plumbing, leaking roofing, lighting, electrical and HVAC systems, restrooms, upgrade safety, security, fire systems, remove hazardous\r\nmaterials, improve energy efficiency, replace temporary classrooms, renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip classrooms, schools, sites, facilities, shall Gridley Unified School District Elementary Schools Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue $2,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1058, "no_votes": 853, "total_votes": 1911, "percent_yes": 55.3637, "percent_no": 44.6363, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.110556", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.981185", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local ELEMENTARY education, repair, upgrade outdated classrooms, plumbing, leaking roofing, lighting, electrical and HVAC systems, restrooms, upgrade safety, security, fire systems, remove hazardous\r\nmaterials, improve energy efficiency, replace temporary classrooms, renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip classrooms, schools, sites, facilities, shall Gridley Unified School District Elementary Schools Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue $2,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5674, "fingerprint": "2012|201200336|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200336|BUTTE", "content_hash": "74043a6348cc44e7", "measure_id": "201200336", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing current tax rates and to improve the quality of education at local Chico schools, improve student access to computers and modern technology, repair leaky roofs, replace plumbing systems, and upgrade heating, ventilation and cooling systems, shall Chico Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, modernize restrooms, classrooms, school facilities, sites, fields, equipment by issuing $78,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and NO money taken by the State or used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27112, "no_votes": 14622, "total_votes": 41734, "percent_yes": 64.9638, "percent_no": 35.036199999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.111944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.982125", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing current tax rates and to improve the quality of education at local Chico schools, improve student access to computers and modern technology, repair leaky roofs, replace plumbing systems, and upgrade heating, ventilation and cooling systems, shall Chico Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, modernize restrooms, classrooms, school facilities, sites, fields, equipment by issuing $78,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and NO money taken by the State or used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5675, "fingerprint": "2012|201200337|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200337|BUTTE", "content_hash": "1eb7f5bf38c953ed", "measure_id": "201200337", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Gridley High School, repair leaky roods, improve student access to computers and modern technology, construct a new gym for school and community use, lower energy costs by upgrading electrical/plumbing/heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall gridley Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities by issuing $11,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and NO money for administrators' or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1377, "no_votes": 2200, "total_votes": 3577, "percent_yes": 38.4959, "percent_no": 61.5041, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.112264", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.982310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Gridley High School, repair leaky roods, improve student access to computers and modern technology, construct a new gym for school and community use, lower energy costs by upgrading electrical/plumbing/heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall gridley Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities by issuing $11,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and NO money for administrators' or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5670, "fingerprint": "2012|201200007|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200007|BUTTE", "content_hash": "6a31304a5f14b50b", "measure_id": "201200007", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the Butte County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60690, "no_votes": 22058, "total_votes": 82748, "percent_yes": 73.3432, "percent_no": 26.656800000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.110880", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.981381", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Butte County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5671, "fingerprint": "2012|201200097|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200097|BUTTE", "content_hash": "e9f336758f54a3aa", "measure_id": "201200097", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City's Telephone User's Tax in order to: 1) reduce the tax rate from 5% to 4.5%; 2) modernize the definition of telephone communication services subject to the tax to include new technologies such as wireless and voice over internet services; 3) apply the tax to all telephone communications services regardless of the type of technology used; and 4) reflect changes to federal and state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16481, "no_votes": 14257, "total_votes": 30738, "percent_yes": 53.6177, "percent_no": 46.3823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.111147", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.981577", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City's Telephone User's Tax in order to: 1) reduce the tax rate from 5% to 4.5%; 2) modernize the definition of telephone communication services subject to the tax to include new technologies such as wireless and voice over internet services; 3) apply the tax to all telephone communications services regardless of the type of technology used; and 4) reflect changes to federal and state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5672, "fingerprint": "2012|201200098|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200098|BUTTE", "content_hash": "e8f38ad0b5a6a61d", "measure_id": "201200098", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a resolution be adopted which supports an amendemnt to the United States Constitution to establish that corporations are not entitled to a constitutional right ot political free speech and that the expenditure of money by corporations to support or oppose political campaigns is not entitled to the free speech protections of the First Amendment and should be regulated, limited and clearly disclosed.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17747, "no_votes": 12423, "total_votes": 30170, "percent_yes": 58.8233, "percent_no": 41.1767, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.111410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.981759", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a resolution be adopted which supports an amendemnt to the United States Constitution to establish that corporations are not entitled to a constitutional right ot political free speech and that the expenditure of money by corporations to support or oppose political campaigns is not entitled to the free speech protections of the First Amendment and should be regulated, limited and clearly disclosed.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5673, "fingerprint": "2012|201200099|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200099|BUTTE", "content_hash": "869467a181a390ec", "measure_id": "201200099", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 605 of the Charter of the City of Chico be amended to provide that the City Clerk shall be appointed by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18634, "no_votes": 10123, "total_votes": 28757, "percent_yes": 64.7981, "percent_no": 35.201899999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.111675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.981940", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 605 of the Charter of the City of Chico be amended to provide that the City Clerk shall be appointed by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5667, "fingerprint": "2012|201200006|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200006|BUTTE", "content_hash": "e1e36fa421a82b01", "measure_id": "201200006", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance, Ordinance Number 4029, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22722, "no_votes": 27701, "total_votes": 50423, "percent_yes": 45.0628, "percent_no": 54.9372, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.109998", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.980797", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance, Ordinance Number 4029, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5676, "fingerprint": "2012|201200338|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200338|BUTTE", "content_hash": "f4b0519f69984a7f", "measure_id": "201200338", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For decreasing the number of members of the county board of education from seven to five: Yes/No", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 144, "no_votes": 43, "total_votes": 187, "percent_yes": 77.0053, "percent_no": 22.994699999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.112528", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.982501", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For decreasing the number of members of the county board of education from seven to five: Yes/No", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5677, "fingerprint": "2012|201200008|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200008|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "afa84097faa081d2", "measure_id": "201200008", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the Calaveras County/Cityof Angels Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commericial vehicles) be renewed for a ten year term (commencing July 1, 2013) under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14517, "no_votes": 5964, "total_votes": 20481, "percent_yes": 70.88029999999999, "percent_no": 29.11970000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.112796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.982711", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Calaveras County/Cityof Angels Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commericial vehicles) be renewed for a ten year term (commencing July 1, 2013) under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5678, "fingerprint": "2012|201200009|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200009|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "b79cc770959f66ea", "measure_id": "201200009", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 12-02 of the Circle XX Community Services District, establishing a special tax for a ten year period (July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2023) in the annual amount of $400 per parcel of real property (for constructing, opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing, or maintaining any street in the District, or for any incidental purposes, including construction and improvements of bridges, culverts, curbs, gutters, and drains) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97, "no_votes": 36, "total_votes": 133, "percent_yes": 72.93230000000001, "percent_no": 27.067699999999988, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.113063", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.982900", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 12-02 of the Circle XX Community Services District, establishing a special tax for a ten year period (July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2023) in the annual amount of $400 per parcel of real property (for constructing, opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing, or maintaining any street in the District, or for any incidental purposes, including construction and improvements of bridges, culverts, curbs, gutters, and drains) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5679, "fingerprint": "2012|201200100|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200100|COLUSA", "content_hash": "00947913be9933a2", "measure_id": "201200100", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Williams continue to collect a one-half percent sales tax to help preserve the safety and character of Williams, by funding essential services such as road maintenance, fire/police services, and other general governmental purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 576, "no_votes": 236, "total_votes": 812, "percent_yes": 70.93599999999999, "percent_no": 29.064000000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.113333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.983080", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Williams continue to collect a one-half percent sales tax to help preserve the safety and character of Williams, by funding essential services such as road maintenance, fire/police services, and other general governmental purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5690, "fingerprint": "2012|201200342|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200342|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "15bf9387a2758e09", "measure_id": "201200342", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize Antioch High School by renovating classrooms including science and computer labs, improving critical safety and security systems, building a library and cafeteria, upgrading athletic facilities, replacing inefficient building systems, and improving student access to classroom technology, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of Antioch Unified School District issue $56.5 million in construction bonds at legal interest rates with funds monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee with no funds spent on Administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12264, "no_votes": 7251, "total_votes": 19515, "percent_yes": 62.844, "percent_no": 37.156, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.116989", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.985309", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize Antioch High School by renovating classrooms including science and computer labs, improving critical safety and security systems, building a library and cafeteria, upgrading athletic facilities, replacing inefficient building systems, and improving student access to classroom technology, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of Antioch Unified School District issue $56.5 million in construction bonds at legal interest rates with funds monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee with no funds spent on Administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5692, "fingerprint": "2012|201200346|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200346|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5d660da33d1c69e0", "measure_id": "201200346", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue funding academic programs that provide college and career pathways and help maintain student-teacher ratios, offset State budget cuts to education funding, improve access to modern technology, and maintain art, music and band programs, library services and counselors, shall Martinez Unified School District renew its expiring parcel tax at $50 per parcel annually for five years, with an exemption for seniors, age 65 or over, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8924, "no_votes": 4018, "total_votes": 12942, "percent_yes": 68.9538, "percent_no": 31.0462, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.118805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.986248", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding academic programs that provide college and career pathways and help maintain student-teacher ratios, offset State budget cuts to education funding, improve access to modern technology, and maintain art, music and band programs, library services and counselors, shall Martinez Unified School District renew its expiring parcel tax at $50 per parcel annually for five years, with an exemption for seniors, age 65 or over, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5693, "fingerprint": "2012|201200347|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200347|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "1b3a8479afba99a7", "measure_id": "201200347", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local elementary, middle and high school classrooms, labs and learning facilities by adding classrooms to prevent school overcrowding; upgrading fire, security and earthquake safety; updating science labs, and instructional technology infrastructure for 21st-century learning; improving energy efficiency; and renovating, constructing and equipping schools, facilities and classrooms, shall San Ramon Valley Unified School District issue $260 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37380, "no_votes": 23394, "total_votes": 60774, "percent_yes": 61.5066, "percent_no": 38.4934, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.121044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.987556", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local elementary, middle and high school classrooms, labs and learning facilities by adding classrooms to prevent school overcrowding; upgrading fire, security and earthquake safety; updating science labs, and instructional technology infrastructure for 21st-century learning; improving energy efficiency; and renovating, constructing and equipping schools, facilities and classrooms, shall San Ramon Valley Unified School District issue $260 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5694, "fingerprint": "2012|201200348|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200348|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "90ef95b28d7c815e", "measure_id": "201200348", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make schools safe, complete essential health/safety repairs, qualify for State matching grants, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District upgrade schools for earthquake safety and handicap accessibility, remove asbestos, upgrade science labs, restrooms, vocational classrooms, technology and energy systems to reduce costs, install lighting and security systems, and acquire, repair, construct, equipment, sites and facilities, by issuing $360,000,000 in bonds within legal rates and bonding capacity limits with independent audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50266, "no_votes": 27794, "total_votes": 78060, "percent_yes": 64.3941, "percent_no": 35.605900000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.121325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.987746", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make schools safe, complete essential health/safety repairs, qualify for State matching grants, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District upgrade schools for earthquake safety and handicap accessibility, remove asbestos, upgrade science labs, restrooms, vocational classrooms, technology and energy systems to reduce costs, install lighting and security systems, and acquire, repair, construct, equipment, sites and facilities, by issuing $360,000,000 in bonds within legal rates and bonding capacity limits with independent audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5695, "fingerprint": "2012|201200349|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200349|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b7cbd57754454739", "measure_id": "201200349", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education with local funding the State cannot take away, including protecting core academics \u2013 reading, writing, math, science, attracting and retaining quality teachers, providing lower class sizes for the youngest children, preparing students for college and the workforce, and improving safety on and around school campuses, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District renew its existing parcel tax for five years, keeping the current rate, with no funds for administrator salaries, exempting seniors and requiring citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59149, "no_votes": 19077, "total_votes": 78226, "percent_yes": 75.613, "percent_no": 24.387, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.121682", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.987933", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education with local funding the State cannot take away, including protecting core academics \u2013 reading, writing, math, science, attracting and retaining quality teachers, providing lower class sizes for the youngest children, preparing students for college and the workforce, and improving safety on and around school campuses, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District renew its existing parcel tax for five years, keeping the current rate, with no funds for administrator salaries, exempting seniors and requiring citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5691, "fingerprint": "2012|201200345|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200345|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "59a1002c0eb8ba2a", "measure_id": "201200345", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "By paying lease obligations relating to existing school facility debt and relieving an annual payment burden on its general fund during a period of shrinking State education funding, shall the Knightsen Elementary School District issue $3,000,000 of bonds payable from property taxes within legal rates and state approved bonding capacity limits, to refinance a lease entered into in 2007 and make funds available to strengthen and enhance the classroom programs and services available to students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 397, "no_votes": 450, "total_votes": 847, "percent_yes": 46.8713, "percent_no": 53.1287, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.118489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.986068", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "By paying lease obligations relating to existing school facility debt and relieving an annual payment burden on its general fund during a period of shrinking State education funding, shall the Knightsen Elementary School District issue $3,000,000 of bonds payable from property taxes within legal rates and state approved bonding capacity limits, to refinance a lease entered into in 2007 and make funds available to strengthen and enhance the classroom programs and services available to students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11392, "fingerprint": "2012|201200108|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200108|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "0bff57b5c1978316", "measure_id": "201200108", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer by appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19403, "no_votes": 21465, "total_votes": 40868, "percent_yes": 47.4772, "percent_no": 52.5228, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.999590", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.117604", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.985693", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer by appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5682, "fingerprint": "2012|201200340|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200340|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "da7aadd427b69b76", "measure_id": "201200340", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For critical renovation, modernization and safety needs at Antioch High School by building new, permanent classrooms including science and computer labs and a library, upgrading electrical systems, improving student access to computers and technology, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Antioch Unified School District issue $59,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with funds monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee and no funds spent on administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4722, "no_votes": 3937, "total_votes": 8659, "percent_yes": 54.5329, "percent_no": 45.4671, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.114478", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.983816", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For critical renovation, modernization and safety needs at Antioch High School by building new, permanent classrooms including science and computer labs and a library, upgrading electrical systems, improving student access to computers and technology, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Antioch Unified School District issue $59,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with funds monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee and no funds spent on administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11394, "fingerprint": "2012|201200109|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200109|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "68d9f45ccd2469d6", "measure_id": "201200109", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To keep local streets from falling into disrepair and maintain Town services, including: fixing potholes and cracks; maintaining neighborhood police patrols and response times; repairing neighborhood streets; maintaining recreation programs for youth and seniors; other general Town services, shall the Town of Moraga enact a one-cent sales tax for 20 years with authority to incur debt to accelerate infrastructure projects, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no funds for Sacramento and all funds spent only for Moraga?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5993, "no_votes": 2503, "total_votes": 8496, "percent_yes": 70.5391, "percent_no": 29.460899999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.000466", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.119089", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.986434", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep local streets from falling into disrepair and maintain Town services, including: fixing potholes and cracks; maintaining neighborhood police patrols and response times; repairing neighborhood streets; maintaining recreation programs for youth and seniors; other general Town services, shall the Town of Moraga enact a one-cent sales tax for 20 years with authority to incur debt to accelerate infrastructure projects, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no funds for Sacramento and all funds spent only for Moraga?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5688, "fingerprint": "2012|201200341|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200341|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5f53d9c614f777f0", "measure_id": "201200341", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide local funding the State cannot take away, preserve quality education including: reading, writing, math, science; maintaining reduced class sizes for the youngest children; retaining quality teachers; supporting libraries, improving campus safety; preparing students for college/workforce; shall West Contra Costa Unified School District renew its existing parcel tax for five years, increasing it by three cents/square foot of building area or three dollars/vacant parcel, with no funds for administrator salaries, exempting seniors and requiring citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23928, "no_votes": 12594, "total_votes": 36522, "percent_yes": 65.5167, "percent_no": 34.4833, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.116352", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.984944", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide local funding the State cannot take away, preserve quality education including: reading, writing, math, science; maintaining reduced class sizes for the youngest children; retaining quality teachers; supporting libraries, improving campus safety; preparing students for college/workforce; shall West Contra Costa Unified School District renew its existing parcel tax for five years, increasing it by three cents/square foot of building area or three dollars/vacant parcel, with no funds for administrator salaries, exempting seniors and requiring citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11395, "fingerprint": "2012|201200110|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200110|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "de87493fed46861c", "measure_id": "201200110", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help protect and maintain city services, including repairing failing roads, fixing potholes, improving traffic safety on local streets, fixing drains, and providing for other city services, shall the City of Orinda enact a one-half cent sales tax, for 10 years, with financial audits, public review of all expenditures, and a citizens\u2019 oversight commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7569, "no_votes": 3311, "total_votes": 10880, "percent_yes": 69.568, "percent_no": 30.432000000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.000660", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.119382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.986625", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help protect and maintain city services, including repairing failing roads, fixing potholes, improving traffic safety on local streets, fixing drains, and providing for other city services, shall the City of Orinda enact a one-half cent sales tax, for 10 years, with financial audits, public review of all expenditures, and a citizens\u2019 oversight commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5681, "fingerprint": "2012|201200101|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200101|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e493b68e92eb92cb", "measure_id": "201200101", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3679, "no_votes": 8943, "total_votes": 12622, "percent_yes": 29.1475, "percent_no": 70.85249999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.113928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.983447", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11396, "fingerprint": "2012|201200111|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200111|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "49602c6140ade11b", "measure_id": "201200111", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without raising current tax rates, and to maintain a high quality of life and essential local public services to the residents of Pinole, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the existing Utility Users Tax of eight percent for an additional eight years, until December 31, 2020, keeping this locally generated revenue in Pinole?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6009, "no_votes": 1593, "total_votes": 7602, "percent_yes": 79.045, "percent_no": 20.955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.000858", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.119755", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.986813", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without raising current tax rates, and to maintain a high quality of life and essential local public services to the residents of Pinole, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the existing Utility Users Tax of eight percent for an additional eight years, until December 31, 2020, keeping this locally generated revenue in Pinole?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11393, "fingerprint": "2012|201200344|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200344|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6e511d39f1923d6f", "measure_id": "201200344", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide Diablo Valley College, Contra Costa College, Los Medanos College, and the Brentwood and San Ramon Centers with funds that cannot be taken by the state; maintain high quality education; support course offerings and instructional programs, including healthcare, technology, and public safety; increase access to support services, and prepare students for university transfer; shall Contra Costa Community College District levy $11 per parcel for six years with Citizens\u2019 Oversight, no funds for administrative salaries, and all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 265916, "no_votes": 136029, "total_votes": 401945, "percent_yes": 66.15729999999999, "percent_no": 33.84270000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.999789", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.118060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.985879", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide Diablo Valley College, Contra Costa College, Los Medanos College, and the Brentwood and San Ramon Centers with funds that cannot be taken by the state; maintain high quality education; support course offerings and instructional programs, including healthcare, technology, and public safety; increase access to support services, and prepare students for university transfer; shall Contra Costa Community College District levy $11 per parcel for six years with Citizens\u2019 Oversight, no funds for administrative salaries, and all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11391, "fingerprint": "2012|201200343|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200343|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ce0d285899dbe5cd", "measure_id": "201200343", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide Chabot and Las Positas Community Colleges funds that cannot be taken by the state, ensure affordable quality education, prepare students for university transfer, maintain job training in healthcare, technology, public safety, and other areas, uphold core academics, and preserve student support services, shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District levy $28 per parcel annually for six years with Citizens\u2019 Oversight, no money for permanent salaries, and all funds spent on local colleges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58, "no_votes": 43, "total_votes": 101, "percent_yes": 57.4257, "percent_no": 42.5743, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.999389", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.117332", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.985504", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide Chabot and Las Positas Community Colleges funds that cannot be taken by the state, ensure affordable quality education, prepare students for university transfer, maintain job training in healthcare, technology, public safety, and other areas, uphold core academics, and preserve student support services, shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District levy $28 per parcel annually for six years with Citizens\u2019 Oversight, no money for permanent salaries, and all funds spent on local colleges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11390, "fingerprint": "2012|201200102|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200102|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "378d38b81c9f766c", "measure_id": "201200102", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the position of a directly elected mayor be eliminated, so that the Antioch City Council is composed of five members who will choose among themselves who will serve as mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2023, "no_votes": 10635, "total_votes": 12658, "percent_yes": 15.982, "percent_no": 84.018, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:35.997413", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.114194", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.983630", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the position of a directly elected mayor be eliminated, so that the Antioch City Council is composed of five members who will choose among themselves who will serve as mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5680, "fingerprint": "2012|201200339|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200339|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b4dc6ca37d50bd78", "measure_id": "201200339", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "This measure will secure local funding for K-8 Moraga School District students. It will sustain our nationally recognized schools; offset state budget cuts; preserve small class sizes and strong academics; and attract and retain outstanding teachers. Shall the Moraga School District be authorzied to collect an additional parcel tax in the amount of $225 with a citizen's oversight committee and an exemption for low seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3615, "no_votes": 1949, "total_votes": 5564, "percent_yes": 64.9712, "percent_no": 35.028800000000004, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-05-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.113603", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.983262", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "This measure will secure local funding for K-8 Moraga School District students. It will sustain our nationally recognized schools; offset state budget cuts; preserve small class sizes and strong academics; and attract and retain outstanding teachers. Shall the Moraga School District be authorzied to collect an additional parcel tax in the amount of $225 with a citizen's oversight committee and an exemption for low seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11397, "fingerprint": "2012|201200113|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200113|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "423a739e3c5d8012", "measure_id": "201200113", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a business license fee of one (1) cent per ounce of sugar-sweetened beverage served, provided, or traded by businesses in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10549, "no_votes": 21395, "total_votes": 31944, "percent_yes": 33.0234, "percent_no": 66.97659999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.001056", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.120053", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.986995", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a business license fee of one (1) cent per ounce of sugar-sweetened beverage served, provided, or traded by businesses in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5684, "fingerprint": "2012|201200103|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200103|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "acf32b74d8553936", "measure_id": "201200103", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council of the City of Hercules be authorized to sell the Hercules Municipal Utility with the net proceeds designated for repayment of the Utility\u2019s debt and other contractual obligations, and any remaining proceeds allocated to the City\u2019s general fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2987, "no_votes": 908, "total_votes": 3895, "percent_yes": 76.6881, "percent_no": 23.311899999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.115187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.984191", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council of the City of Hercules be authorized to sell the Hercules Municipal Utility with the net proceeds designated for repayment of the Utility\u2019s debt and other contractual obligations, and any remaining proceeds allocated to the City\u2019s general fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11398, "fingerprint": "2012|201200112|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200112|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3a21b8b66338ccdd", "measure_id": "201200112", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the proceeds of any business license fee measured by the serving, providing, or trading of sugar-sweetened beverages be used to: have more after school sports programs, make them less expensive and provide adequate sports fields; allow healthier school meals, nutrition classes and cooking classes; provide medical care for children with diabetes who can\u2019t afford care; and support other worthy projects to prevent and treat diabetes and childhood obesity?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18672, "no_votes": 10042, "total_votes": 28714, "percent_yes": 65.0275, "percent_no": 34.9725, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.001254", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.120340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.987177", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the proceeds of any business license fee measured by the serving, providing, or trading of sugar-sweetened beverages be used to: have more after school sports programs, make them less expensive and provide adequate sports fields; allow healthier school meals, nutrition classes and cooking classes; provide medical care for children with diabetes who can\u2019t afford care; and support other worthy projects to prevent and treat diabetes and childhood obesity?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5685, "fingerprint": "2012|201200104|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200104|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3869532a4ef68b94", "measure_id": "201200104", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address Hercules\u2019 Fiscal Emergency, stabilize city finances, offset budget shortfalls/the impact of State budget cuts on local services, prevent reductions to the number of police officers/crime investigators, protect/maintain crime prevention, childcare, youth sports and recreation programs and other general City services, shall the City of Hercules establish a \u00bd cent sales tax legally ending after 4 years, with Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight, Independent Audits and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2757, "no_votes": 1138, "total_votes": 3895, "percent_yes": 70.7831, "percent_no": 29.216899999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.115461", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.984376", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address Hercules\u2019 Fiscal Emergency, stabilize city finances, offset budget shortfalls/the impact of State budget cuts on local services, prevent reductions to the number of police officers/crime investigators, protect/maintain crime prevention, childcare, youth sports and recreation programs and other general City services, shall the City of Hercules establish a \u00bd cent sales tax legally ending after 4 years, with Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight, Independent Audits and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11399, "fingerprint": "2012|201200114|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200114|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7495519c3e50eecb", "measure_id": "201200114", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should Richmond\u2019s congressional representatives be instructed to propose, and Richmond\u2019s state legislators instructed to ratify, an amendment to the United States Constitution to provide that corporations are not entitled to the Constitutional rights of real people, and that there should be limits on all spending in political campaigns, including ballot measures and \"independent\" expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20519, "no_votes": 7600, "total_votes": 28119, "percent_yes": 72.97200000000001, "percent_no": 27.02799999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.001449", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.120621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.987366", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Richmond\u2019s congressional representatives be instructed to propose, and Richmond\u2019s state legislators instructed to ratify, an amendment to the United States Constitution to provide that corporations are not entitled to the Constitutional rights of real people, and that there should be limits on all spending in political campaigns, including ballot measures and \"independent\" expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5686, "fingerprint": "2012|201200105|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200105|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "c44fe2c8cd6e825b", "measure_id": "201200105", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding that stays in Pittsburg and cannot be seized by the State, to be used for Public Safety, gang prevention, job creation programs for local residents, to keep the Senior Center open, to maintain other City services, shall the City of Pittsburg enact a temporary, half-cent sales tax for five years, reduced to one-quarter cent for five years, then the increase be terminated, altogether, with citizens\u2019 oversight, mandatory audits and consistent community reporting?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5094, "no_votes": 1819, "total_votes": 6913, "percent_yes": 73.6873, "percent_no": 26.312700000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.115737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.984566", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding that stays in Pittsburg and cannot be seized by the State, to be used for Public Safety, gang prevention, job creation programs for local residents, to keep the Senior Center open, to maintain other City services, shall the City of Pittsburg enact a temporary, half-cent sales tax for five years, reduced to one-quarter cent for five years, then the increase be terminated, altogether, with citizens\u2019 oversight, mandatory audits and consistent community reporting?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5687, "fingerprint": "2012|201200106|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200106|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "a0e26aac89f67af1", "measure_id": "201200106", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding that cannot be seized by the State, but will stay in San Pablo for such things as Public Safety, gang prevention, youth services, job creation and job training programs for local residents (including the disenfranchised) and all other general city services, shall San Pablo enact a temporary half-cent sales tax for 5 years, reduced to one-quarter cent for 5 years, then terminated altogether, with citizens\u2019 oversight, mandatory audits, and consistent community reporting?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1594, "no_votes": 573, "total_votes": 2167, "percent_yes": 73.5579, "percent_no": 26.442099999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.116083", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.984755", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding that cannot be seized by the State, but will stay in San Pablo for such things as Public Safety, gang prevention, youth services, job creation and job training programs for local residents (including the disenfranchised) and all other general city services, shall San Pablo enact a temporary half-cent sales tax for 5 years, reduced to one-quarter cent for 5 years, then terminated altogether, with citizens\u2019 oversight, mandatory audits, and consistent community reporting?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5683, "fingerprint": "2012|201200010|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200010|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5b3a2b4164232dfc", "measure_id": "201200010", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a resolution be adopted which will authorize the Board of Directors to increase the existing $50 recreation special tax on residential parcels within the Crockett and Port Costa areas for maintenance and operation of the District\u2019s park and recreation facilities and services within the District and not to exceed a total of $110 per parcel per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 615, "no_votes": 294, "total_votes": 909, "percent_yes": 67.65679999999999, "percent_no": 32.34320000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.114897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.984004", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a resolution be adopted which will authorize the Board of Directors to increase the existing $50 recreation special tax on residential parcels within the Crockett and Port Costa areas for maintenance and operation of the District\u2019s park and recreation facilities and services within the District and not to exceed a total of $110 per parcel per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5689, "fingerprint": "2012|201200107|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200107|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "255ab407f7ce9011", "measure_id": "201200107", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on April 11, 2012, by the Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the annexation to the City of Martinez of the territory described in that order and designated as North Pacheco Annexation to the City of Martinez be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39, "no_votes": 40, "total_votes": 79, "percent_yes": 49.3671, "percent_no": 50.6329, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-08-28", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.116635", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.985127", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on April 11, 2012, by the Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the annexation to the City of Martinez of the territory described in that order and designated as North Pacheco Annexation to the City of Martinez be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5696, "fingerprint": "2012|201200115|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200115|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "aca4679db5764f6c", "measure_id": "201200115", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be an ammendment to the municipal code mandating a moratorium on water flouridation in the city of Crescent City, California, until such time the flouridation chemical manufacturer provides to the public toxicological reports, a list of contaminants and their amounts, and a written claim for safety for all water consumers of their flouridation product.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 573, "no_votes": 444, "total_votes": 1017, "percent_yes": 56.3422, "percent_no": 43.6578, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.122012", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.988120", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be an ammendment to the municipal code mandating a moratorium on water flouridation in the city of Crescent City, California, until such time the flouridation chemical manufacturer provides to the public toxicological reports, a list of contaminants and their amounts, and a written claim for safety for all water consumers of their flouridation product.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5699, "fingerprint": "2012|201200116|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200116|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "c3023a3cc04e4203", "measure_id": "201200116", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance that amends the methods for calculating certain business taxes in the City of South Lake Tahoe to increase locally controlled revenue for city services and operations; such as, police, fire, paramedics, snow removal, parks, and street repair; by reducing the percentage of taxes paid on gross revenues by five percent and increasing the not to exceed amount from $3,448 to $20,000 per calendar year and eliminating the cost of living increase, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1194, "no_votes": 953, "total_votes": 2147, "percent_yes": 55.6125, "percent_no": 44.3875, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "#NULL!", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.122883", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.988663", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance that amends the methods for calculating certain business taxes in the City of South Lake Tahoe to increase locally controlled revenue for city services and operations; such as, police, fire, paramedics, snow removal, parks, and street repair; by reducing the percentage of taxes paid on gross revenues by five percent and increasing the not to exceed amount from $3,448 to $20,000 per calendar year and eliminating the cost of living increase, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5697, "fingerprint": "2012|201200011|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200011|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "1d68599503d265c5", "measure_id": "201200011", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Section 602 of the El Dorado County Charter, which currently requires the procurement of all services to be pursuant to a written contract, be amended to provide the Board of Supervisors with the authority to allow the procurement of services for less than $10,000.00 without the need for a written contract; provided, that the Board of Supervisors does so by ordinance which specifies alternate procedures for processing and documenting the purchases?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23647, "no_votes": 22443, "total_votes": 46090, "percent_yes": 51.3061, "percent_no": 48.6939, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.122286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.988298", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 602 of the El Dorado County Charter, which currently requires the procurement of all services to be pursuant to a written contract, be amended to provide the Board of Supervisors with the authority to allow the procurement of services for less than $10,000.00 without the need for a written contract; provided, that the Board of Supervisors does so by ordinance which specifies alternate procedures for processing and documenting the purchases?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5698, "fingerprint": "2012|201200350|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200350|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "9dcee5a12b10fc56", "measure_id": "201200350", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local education, make health, safety/handicapped accessibility improvements, improve energy efficiency, modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms/libraries, replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms, replace outdated heating, ventilation/air conditioning systems, improve technology, upgrade electrical systems, shall Pollock Pines Elementary School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities/sites by issuing $9,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1606, "no_votes": 995, "total_votes": 2601, "percent_yes": 61.7455, "percent_no": 38.2545, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.122557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.988481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local education, make health, safety/handicapped accessibility improvements, improve energy efficiency, modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms/libraries, replace temporary portables with permanent classrooms, replace outdated heating, ventilation/air conditioning systems, improve technology, upgrade electrical systems, shall Pollock Pines Elementary School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities/sites by issuing $9,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5700, "fingerprint": "2012|201200012|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200012|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "74db3e390539b756", "measure_id": "201200012", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain library services, shall El Dorado County levy a special tax within CSA10, commencing in fiscal year 2013/2014, and expiring after 15 years, at the following rates (with annual increases up to 3%): base tax of $17.58 per parcel, 80% of the base tax per multi-family residential dwelling unit, 50% of the base tax per mobilehome for parcels containing mobilehome parks, 50% of the base tax for unimproved parcels, and $1.00 per timeshare?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37745, "no_votes": 46050, "total_votes": 83795, "percent_yes": 45.0445, "percent_no": 54.9555, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.123232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.988846", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain library services, shall El Dorado County levy a special tax within CSA10, commencing in fiscal year 2013/2014, and expiring after 15 years, at the following rates (with annual increases up to 3%): base tax of $17.58 per parcel, 80% of the base tax per multi-family residential dwelling unit, 50% of the base tax per mobilehome for parcels containing mobilehome parks, 50% of the base tax for unimproved parcels, and $1.00 per timeshare?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5708, "fingerprint": "2012|201200119|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200119|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d7f3ff6893e7e92e", "measure_id": "201200119", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Glenda Hill be recalled (removed) from the office of Orange Cove City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 776, "no_votes": 654, "total_votes": 1430, "percent_yes": 54.2657, "percent_no": 45.7343, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.126455", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.990741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Glenda Hill be recalled (removed) from the office of Orange Cove City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5709, "fingerprint": "2012|201200120|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200120|FRESNO", "content_hash": "54a977e298a30d0c", "measure_id": "201200120", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Frank R. Martinez be recalled (removed) from the office of Orange Cove City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 745, "no_votes": 684, "total_votes": 1429, "percent_yes": 52.1344, "percent_no": 47.8656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.126727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.990924", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Frank R. Martinez be recalled (removed) from the office of Orange Cove City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5705, "fingerprint": "2012|201200013|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200013|FRESNO", "content_hash": "005943e5e76e8a24", "measure_id": "201200013", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect libraries from state budget cuts by preventing library closures and reduced library hours; keeping qualified librarians; improving reading/literacy, job search programs/computer technology; providing neighborhood school-library joint programs, and maintaining services for children, seniors and the blind, shall Fresno County voters continue the voter-approved 1/8-cent sales tax for neighborhood libraries for sixteen years, with audits, citizen\u2019s oversight, all funds staying in Fresno County and no tax rate increase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 180499, "no_votes": 65784, "total_votes": 246283, "percent_yes": 73.2893, "percent_no": 26.710700000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.124823", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.989805", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect libraries from state budget cuts by preventing library closures and reduced library hours; keeping qualified librarians; improving reading/literacy, job search programs/computer technology; providing neighborhood school-library joint programs, and maintaining services for children, seniors and the blind, shall Fresno County voters continue the voter-approved 1/8-cent sales tax for neighborhood libraries for sixteen years, with audits, citizen\u2019s oversight, all funds staying in Fresno County and no tax rate increase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5704, "fingerprint": "2012|201200353|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200353|FRESNO", "content_hash": "718ae0932abf0368", "measure_id": "201200353", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe state cuts, maintain quality neighborhood schools, and retain/attract quality teachers by: Improving agricultural/vocational education programs; Upgrading deteriorating classrooms, technology, science labs, libraries, and fire safety; Repairing electrical wiring, leaky roofs, plumbing/restrooms; Repairing air/heating/water systems; and Constructing/equipping school facilities Shall Caruthers Unified School District issue $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, independent audits, citizen\u2019s oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, and prohibit Sacramento from taking these local funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1264, "no_votes": 624, "total_votes": 1888, "percent_yes": 66.94919999999999, "percent_no": 33.05080000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.124402", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.989601", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state cuts, maintain quality neighborhood schools, and retain/attract quality teachers by: Improving agricultural/vocational education programs; Upgrading deteriorating classrooms, technology, science labs, libraries, and fire safety; Repairing electrical wiring, leaky roofs, plumbing/restrooms; Repairing air/heating/water systems; and Constructing/equipping school facilities Shall Caruthers Unified School District issue $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, independent audits, citizen\u2019s oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions, and prohibit Sacramento from taking these local funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5706, "fingerprint": "2012|201200118|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200118|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3d64021eab2700ac", "measure_id": "201200118", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to require Council to establish: a policy for managing City reserves; a policy for issuing and managing debts with Controller certification on the reliability of funds for debt repayment; and a policy establishing a due diligence process for evaluating requests by the private sector for City financial assistance that exceeds one million dollars?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76318, "no_votes": 34761, "total_votes": 111079, "percent_yes": 68.7061, "percent_no": 31.293899999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.125096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.989993", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to require Council to establish: a policy for managing City reserves; a policy for issuing and managing debts with Controller certification on the reliability of funds for debt repayment; and a policy establishing a due diligence process for evaluating requests by the private sector for City financial assistance that exceeds one million dollars?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5707, "fingerprint": "2012|201200354|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200354|FRESNO", "content_hash": "365a9ff1b7944a59", "measure_id": "201200354", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset State budget cuts, qualify for State matching funds, provide every community equal educational opportunities, and retain/attract quality teachers, by acquiring, constructing, repairing, renovating, furnishing, and equipping new and existing school and community/joint-use facilities including: bathrooms, roofs, fire safety, libraries, technology, energy efficiency, handicap accessibility, and vocational education, shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District issue $40 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, and all money staying local, not for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6606, "no_votes": 3825, "total_votes": 10431, "percent_yes": 63.3305, "percent_no": 36.6695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.125829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.990356", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset State budget cuts, qualify for State matching funds, provide every community equal educational opportunities, and retain/attract quality teachers, by acquiring, constructing, repairing, renovating, furnishing, and equipping new and existing school and community/joint-use facilities including: bathrooms, roofs, fire safety, libraries, technology, energy efficiency, handicap accessibility, and vocational education, shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District issue $40 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, and all money staying local, not for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5711, "fingerprint": "2012|201200358|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200358|FRESNO", "content_hash": "619195b1ce685fba", "measure_id": "201200358", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, equip/construct classrooms/college facilities, upgrade computer/technology systems for student access, and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $12,655,000 of West Hills Community College District School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 bonds, approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for any salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 822, "no_votes": 487, "total_votes": 1309, "percent_yes": 62.796, "percent_no": 37.204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.127629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.991482", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, equip/construct classrooms/college facilities, upgrade computer/technology systems for student access, and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $12,655,000 of West Hills Community College District School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 bonds, approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for any salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11401, "fingerprint": "2012|201200355|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200355|FRESNO", "content_hash": "7474120fccab280a", "measure_id": "201200355", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize, renovate, and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities at local Mendota schools, improve energy efficiency by replacing outdated windows, lighting, and heating ventilation and air-conditioning systems, improve student access to computers and modern technology; and replace leaky roofs and inadequate electrical systems; shall the Mendota Unified School District issue $19,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the State or used for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 856, "no_votes": 302, "total_votes": 1158, "percent_yes": 73.92060000000001, "percent_no": 26.079399999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.004788", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.126126", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.990551", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize, renovate, and construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities at local Mendota schools, improve energy efficiency by replacing outdated windows, lighting, and heating ventilation and air-conditioning systems, improve student access to computers and modern technology; and replace leaky roofs and inadequate electrical systems; shall the Mendota Unified School District issue $19,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the State or used for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5701, "fingerprint": "2012|201200351|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200351|FRESNO", "content_hash": "479bba8aa4df999f", "measure_id": "201200351", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent neighborhood schools, offset state budet cuts, and retain/attract quality teachers by: Upgrading classrooms/science labs/fire safety systems/libraries; Improving energy efficiency systems; Enhancing vocational education facilities; Fixing deteriorating roofs/plumbing/bathrooms; Ensuring handicapped accessibilty; and Acquiring sites, constructing/equipping school facilities. Shall Clovis Unified School District issue $298 million in bonds at legal interest rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, no money for Sacramento, and no tax rate increase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23752, "no_votes": 12677, "total_votes": 36429, "percent_yes": 65.2008, "percent_no": 34.7992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.123509", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.989025", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent neighborhood schools, offset state budet cuts, and retain/attract quality teachers by: Upgrading classrooms/science labs/fire safety systems/libraries; Improving energy efficiency systems; Enhancing vocational education facilities; Fixing deteriorating roofs/plumbing/bathrooms; Ensuring handicapped accessibilty; and Acquiring sites, constructing/equipping school facilities. Shall Clovis Unified School District issue $298 million in bonds at legal interest rates, requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, no money for Sacramento, and no tax rate increase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11400, "fingerprint": "2012|201200014|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200014|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d07552957b4ba631", "measure_id": "201200014", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Fresno County Charter, Section 13, be amended to allow the County to employ independent contractors for services performed by County employees by majority vote of the Board of Supervisors and to read: SECTION 13: Notwithstanding Section 44 of this Charter or other provisions of law, the County may employ independent contractors to perform any County service, including service then being performed by County employees, with three affirmative votes of the Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115411, "no_votes": 120090, "total_votes": 235501, "percent_yes": 49.0066, "percent_no": 50.9934, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.004396", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.125440", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.990177", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Fresno County Charter, Section 13, be amended to allow the County to employ independent contractors for services performed by County employees by majority vote of the Board of Supervisors and to read: SECTION 13: Notwithstanding Section 44 of this Charter or other provisions of law, the County may employ independent contractors to perform any County service, including service then being performed by County employees, with three affirmative votes of the Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5703, "fingerprint": "2012|201200352|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200352|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d5924e7140c15cf1", "measure_id": "201200352", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retire debt on the Foothill School construction, shall the Sierra Unified School District issue a maximun of $5,400,000 in bonds, with a maximum ten-year term, and interest rates within legal limits, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries or other routine school operating expenses with all money raised benefiting local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1924, "no_votes": 1856, "total_votes": 3780, "percent_yes": 50.8995, "percent_no": 49.1005, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.124116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.989390", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retire debt on the Foothill School construction, shall the Sierra Unified School District issue a maximun of $5,400,000 in bonds, with a maximum ten-year term, and interest rates within legal limits, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries or other routine school operating expenses with all money raised benefiting local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11402, "fingerprint": "2012|201200356|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200356|FRESNO", "content_hash": "8d38dbfc08f008c9", "measure_id": "201200356", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts, maintain quality neighborhood schools, and retain/attract quality teachers by: Upgrading deteriorating classrooms, science labs, vocational education classrooms, libraries, and fire safety systems; Repairing electrical systems, leaky roofs, plumbing/restrooms; Upgrading classroom technology;\r\nEnsuring handicapped accessibility; and Constructing/equipping school facilities/acquiring sites Shall Sanger Unified School District issue $50 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent annual audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries or pensions, and all money used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9986, "no_votes": 4204, "total_votes": 14190, "percent_yes": 70.3735, "percent_no": 29.626499999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.005374", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.127000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.991103", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts, maintain quality neighborhood schools, and retain/attract quality teachers by: Upgrading deteriorating classrooms, science labs, vocational education classrooms, libraries, and fire safety systems; Repairing electrical systems, leaky roofs, plumbing/restrooms; Upgrading classroom technology;\r\nEnsuring handicapped accessibility; and Constructing/equipping school facilities/acquiring sites Shall Sanger Unified School District issue $50 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent annual audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries or pensions, and all money used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5702, "fingerprint": "2012|201200117|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200117|FRESNO", "content_hash": "04bedc9cb2dec2c7", "measure_id": "201200117", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the safety and quality of life of the City of Parlier through City services - including law enforcement, fire protection, and emergency medical response - and to ensure that all taxpayers are treated fairly, shall the City enact a Utility Users Tax in the amount of 5%, while including protections for senior citizens, and ensuring that all funds remain local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 211, "no_votes": 299, "total_votes": 510, "percent_yes": 41.3725, "percent_no": 58.6275, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.123783", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.989208", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the safety and quality of life of the City of Parlier through City services - including law enforcement, fire protection, and emergency medical response - and to ensure that all taxpayers are treated fairly, shall the City enact a Utility Users Tax in the amount of 5%, while including protections for senior citizens, and ensuring that all funds remain local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5710, "fingerprint": "2012|201200357|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200357|FRESNO", "content_hash": "1729b1d27c592203", "measure_id": "201200357", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare Washington Union High School students for college and quality jobs, shall Washington Unified School District upgrade technology in classrooms, job-training labs, and student- support facilities; modernize science labs; rehabilitate deteriorated roofs, plumbing, electrical, lighting, ventilation; improve safety; and acquire/construct/repair instructional and athletic sites, facilities and equipment; by issuing $22,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds dedicated locally to Washington Union High School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2757, "no_votes": 1030, "total_votes": 3787, "percent_yes": 72.8017, "percent_no": 27.198300000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.127282", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.991290", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare Washington Union High School students for college and quality jobs, shall Washington Unified School District upgrade technology in classrooms, job-training labs, and student- support facilities; modernize science labs; rehabilitate deteriorated roofs, plumbing, electrical, lighting, ventilation; improve safety; and acquire/construct/repair instructional and athletic sites, facilities and equipment; by issuing $22,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds dedicated locally to Washington Union High School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5713, "fingerprint": "2012|201200359|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200359|GLENN", "content_hash": "b4a2251a1c22564e", "measure_id": "201200359", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make health, safety, and handicapped accessibility renovations; modernize heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; increease student access to computers and technology; modernize renovate classrooms, restrooms and school faciliites; and make energy eddiciency modicifcations; shall the Willos Unified School District issues $14,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee andhave NO money taken by the state or used for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1743, "no_votes": 1495, "total_votes": 3238, "percent_yes": 53.8295, "percent_no": 46.1705, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.128164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.991855", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make health, safety, and handicapped accessibility renovations; modernize heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; increease student access to computers and technology; modernize renovate classrooms, restrooms and school faciliites; and make energy eddiciency modicifcations; shall the Willos Unified School District issues $14,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee andhave NO money taken by the state or used for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5712, "fingerprint": "2012|201200121|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200121|GLENN", "content_hash": "3a486471c0b3e51b", "measure_id": "201200121", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 10 percent to 12 percent be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 937, "no_votes": 841, "total_votes": 1778, "percent_yes": 52.69970000000001, "percent_no": 47.30029999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.127899", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.991664", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 10 percent to 12 percent be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5722, "fingerprint": "2012|201200364|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200364|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "524f23e53bccffdc", "measure_id": "201200364", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize, construct and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace old heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; improve energy efficiency; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Fortuna Union High School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5072, "no_votes": 3206, "total_votes": 8278, "percent_yes": 61.2708, "percent_no": 38.7292, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.130903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.993508", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize, construct and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace old heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; improve energy efficiency; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Fortuna Union High School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5720, "fingerprint": "2012|201200362|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200362|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "648b6b8c87ffb94b", "measure_id": "201200362", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away; make health and safety improvements; fund school nursing programs to promote good health; maintain small class sizes; retain teachers; and protect and expand music, art, and dance programs; shall the Arcata Elementary School District collect a $49 yearly education tax for five years, providing an exemption for senior citizens, no money for administration, with citizen oversight and all money benefiting local Arcata Elementary schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4944, "no_votes": 1398, "total_votes": 6342, "percent_yes": 77.95649999999999, "percent_no": 22.04350000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.130306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.993145", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away; make health and safety improvements; fund school nursing programs to promote good health; maintain small class sizes; retain teachers; and protect and expand music, art, and dance programs; shall the Arcata Elementary School District collect a $49 yearly education tax for five years, providing an exemption for senior citizens, no money for administration, with citizen oversight and all money benefiting local Arcata Elementary schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5721, "fingerprint": "2012|201200363|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200363|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "8813d0e4370d1b6d", "measure_id": "201200363", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels; modernize outdated electrical systems; make health and safety improvements; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and replace aging plumbing systems; shall the Arcata Elementary School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4667, "no_votes": 1528, "total_votes": 6195, "percent_yes": 75.3349, "percent_no": 24.665099999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.130632", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.993325", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels; modernize outdated electrical systems; make health and safety improvements; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and replace aging plumbing systems; shall the Arcata Elementary School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5724, "fingerprint": "2012|201200126|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200126|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "8aa1191847da5425", "measure_id": "201200126", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a 3/4 cent increase in the transaction and use tax in the City of Trinidad be approved for four years, starting on April 1, 2013.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115, "no_votes": 93, "total_votes": 208, "percent_yes": 55.2885, "percent_no": 44.7115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.131453", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.993876", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a 3/4 cent increase in the transaction and use tax in the City of Trinidad be approved for four years, starting on April 1, 2013.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5718, "fingerprint": "2012|201200123|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200123|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "0768b2252e9cb10f", "measure_id": "201200123", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) This Initiative makes a declaratory statement that within the City of Arcata, corporations are not natural persons and are not entitled to the protections granted by the United States Constitution to natural persons. The stated purpose of this Initiative is a long-term goal of changing federal and/or state law to be consistent with this understanding of corporations.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6550, "no_votes": 1375, "total_votes": 7925, "percent_yes": 82.6498, "percent_no": 17.3502, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.129698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.992784", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) This Initiative makes a declaratory statement that within the City of Arcata, corporations are not natural persons and are not entitled to the protections granted by the United States Constitution to natural persons. The stated purpose of this Initiative is a long-term goal of changing federal and/or state law to be consistent with this understanding of corporations.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5723, "fingerprint": "2012|201200125|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200125|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "b0998b8d139cc93d", "measure_id": "201200125", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To finance the costs of constructing street improvements consisting of either an asphalt overlay or slurry seal-coat to existing streets in the City of Rio Dell, in order to improve the driving surface and extend the useful life of the roadways in the most economical manner possible, shall the City of Rio Dell issue $2 million in general obligation bonds, maturing 15 years from their issue date, and bearing interest at a rate not in excess of 6%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 595, "no_votes": 475, "total_votes": 1070, "percent_yes": 55.6075, "percent_no": 44.3925, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.131184", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.993695", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance the costs of constructing street improvements consisting of either an asphalt overlay or slurry seal-coat to existing streets in the City of Rio Dell, in order to improve the driving surface and extend the useful life of the roadways in the most economical manner possible, shall the City of Rio Dell issue $2 million in general obligation bonds, maturing 15 years from their issue date, and bearing interest at a rate not in excess of 6%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5719, "fingerprint": "2012|201200124|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200124|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ebc078a419969d80", "measure_id": "201200124", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arcata impose an electricity users tax rate of 45% on residential customers whose electricity usage exceeds 600% over the established Baseline Allowance with sole exemption for households receiving an extended Medical Baseline from the electricity service supplier, and automatically terminating in twelve years (City of Arcata Resolution No. 112-52)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5314, "no_votes": 2501, "total_votes": 7815, "percent_yes": 67.9974, "percent_no": 32.0026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.129968", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.992965", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arcata impose an electricity users tax rate of 45% on residential customers whose electricity usage exceeds 600% over the established Baseline Allowance with sole exemption for households receiving an extended Medical Baseline from the electricity service supplier, and automatically terminating in twelve years (City of Arcata Resolution No. 112-52)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5716, "fingerprint": "2012|201200360|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200360|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "fc53aeb4968a87e5", "measure_id": "201200360", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate classrooms and facilities, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, replace outdated plumbing and water storage systems, make health and safety improvements, and improve access to computers and modern technology, shall Southern Trinity Joint Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, equip classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $2,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 21, "percent_yes": 71.4286, "percent_no": 28.571399999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.129040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.992416", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate classrooms and facilities, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, replace outdated plumbing and water storage systems, make health and safety improvements, and improve access to computers and modern technology, shall Southern Trinity Joint Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, equip classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $2,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5717, "fingerprint": "2012|201200361|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200361|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "175c954c8d8c5da7", "measure_id": "201200361", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; replace 1950s plumbing systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and renovate the multi-purpose room for school and community use; shall the Trinidad Union School District issue $2,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 568, "no_votes": 129, "total_votes": 697, "percent_yes": 81.4921, "percent_no": 18.507900000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.129411", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.992601", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; replace 1950s plumbing systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and renovate the multi-purpose room for school and community use; shall the Trinidad Union School District issue $2,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5715, "fingerprint": "2012|201200122|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200122|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "338addfbc70f25ed", "measure_id": "201200122", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To finance the costs of constructing street improvements consisting of either an asphalt overlay or slurry seal-coat to existing streets in the City of Rio Dell, in order to improve the driving surface and extend the useful life of the roadways in the most economical manner possible, shall the City of Rio Dell issue $2 million in general obligation bonds, maturing 15 years from their issue date, and bearing interest at a rate not in excess of 4.25%.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 437, "no_votes": 260, "total_votes": 697, "percent_yes": 62.6973, "percent_no": 37.3027, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.128730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.992236", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance the costs of constructing street improvements consisting of either an asphalt overlay or slurry seal-coat to existing streets in the City of Rio Dell, in order to improve the driving surface and extend the useful life of the roadways in the most economical manner possible, shall the City of Rio Dell issue $2 million in general obligation bonds, maturing 15 years from their issue date, and bearing interest at a rate not in excess of 4.25%.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5714, "fingerprint": "2012|201200015|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200015|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "624133b09d737e9a", "measure_id": "201200015", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the Humboldt County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned\r\nand wrecked vehicles.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24553, "no_votes": 6253, "total_votes": 30806, "percent_yes": 79.702, "percent_no": 20.298000000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.128454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.992048", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Humboldt County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten year term under California Vehicle Code Sections 9250.7 and 22710, or any successor statutes thereto, for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned\r\nand wrecked vehicles.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5725, "fingerprint": "2012|201200127|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200127|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201200127", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9379, "no_votes": 7715, "total_votes": 17094, "percent_yes": 54.8672, "percent_no": 45.1328, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.131726", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.994053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5726, "fingerprint": "2012|201200128|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200128|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201200128", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1349, "no_votes": 1298, "total_votes": 2647, "percent_yes": 50.9634, "percent_no": 49.0366, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.131993", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.994233", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5727, "fingerprint": "2012|201200365|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200365|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "34addae7891a33db", "measure_id": "201200365", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood schools by keeping schools clean and wel-maintained, repairing/updating classrooms, labs and learning technology, improving school safety with lighting, fences and fire alarms, providing facility upgrades at the middle school, and repairing, acquiring, constructing or equipping aging facilities, sites or classrooms, shall Brawley Elementary School District issue $7,500,000 in bonds at legal interst rates, with Citizens Oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds staying in local elementary and middle schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4081, "no_votes": 2015, "total_votes": 6096, "percent_yes": 66.9455, "percent_no": 33.054500000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.132260", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.994413", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood schools by keeping schools clean and wel-maintained, repairing/updating classrooms, labs and learning technology, improving school safety with lighting, fences and fire alarms, providing facility upgrades at the middle school, and repairing, acquiring, constructing or equipping aging facilities, sites or classrooms, shall Brawley Elementary School District issue $7,500,000 in bonds at legal interst rates, with Citizens Oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds staying in local elementary and middle schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5728, "fingerprint": "2012|201200366|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200366|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "84fa523b1854b25a", "measure_id": "201200366", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To meet the needs of 21st Century classrooms shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District upgrade electrical and computer systems to keep pace with current and future technology, enhance student learning capabilities, provide mobile learning devices to support modern teaching and educational methods and complete school facility upgrades and projects by issuing 41 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 477, "no_votes": 328, "total_votes": 805, "percent_yes": 59.25470000000001, "percent_no": 40.74529999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.132618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.994598", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To meet the needs of 21st Century classrooms shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District upgrade electrical and computer systems to keep pace with current and future technology, enhance student learning capabilities, provide mobile learning devices to support modern teaching and educational methods and complete school facility upgrades and projects by issuing 41 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5734, "fingerprint": "2012|201200367|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200367|KERN", "content_hash": "4e0074051e09db64", "measure_id": "201200367", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education in core subjects like math/science/reading/ writing with funding the State cannot take away, shall Norris School District prevent campus overcrowding by improving and expanding elementary/middle school classrooms/facilities; update science labs/ libraries/ computers/technology; and free up funds to attract/retain teachers, by issuing $149 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3017, "no_votes": 2458, "total_votes": 5475, "percent_yes": 55.105, "percent_no": 44.895, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.134495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.995762", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education in core subjects like math/science/reading/ writing with funding the State cannot take away, shall Norris School District prevent campus overcrowding by improving and expanding elementary/middle school classrooms/facilities; update science labs/ libraries/ computers/technology; and free up funds to attract/retain teachers, by issuing $149 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5739, "fingerprint": "2012|201200368|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200368|KERN", "content_hash": "e98c5edd966cc357", "measure_id": "201200368", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace old heating, ventilation, and airconditioning systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace old plumbing systems; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Taft City Elementary School District issue $23,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the State or used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1132, "no_votes": 895, "total_votes": 2027, "percent_yes": 55.8461, "percent_no": 44.1539, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.136287", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.996949", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace old heating, ventilation, and airconditioning systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace old plumbing systems; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Taft City Elementary School District issue $23,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the State or used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5730, "fingerprint": "2012|201200016|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200016|KERN", "content_hash": "f5e7ae895b88848f", "measure_id": "201200016", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that increases the number of eligible persons certified for appointment from an eligible list from the three (3) highest eligible persons to the seven (7) highest eligible persons whenever a position in the classified service is sought to be filled through open examination, and allows for an additional two (2) eligible persons to be certified for appointment for each additional position sought to be filled through open examination?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56968, "no_votes": 40137, "total_votes": 97105, "percent_yes": 58.6664, "percent_no": 41.3336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.133160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.994958", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that increases the number of eligible persons certified for appointment from an eligible list from the three (3) highest eligible persons to the seven (7) highest eligible persons whenever a position in the classified service is sought to be filled through open examination, and allows for an additional two (2) eligible persons to be certified for appointment for each additional position sought to be filled through open examination?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5731, "fingerprint": "2012|201200017|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200017|KERN", "content_hash": "6446454ecd03468e", "measure_id": "201200017", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that authorizes the Civil Service Commission to establish entry level probationary periods of either six (6) or twelve (12) months for appointees depending on job classification, and to establish a twelve (12) month promotional probationary period for promotions between two different job families?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62414, "no_votes": 34676, "total_votes": 97090, "percent_yes": 64.2847, "percent_no": 35.7153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.133429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.995136", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that authorizes the Civil Service Commission to establish entry level probationary periods of either six (6) or twelve (12) months for appointees depending on job classification, and to establish a twelve (12) month promotional probationary period for promotions between two different job families?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5732, "fingerprint": "2012|201200018|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200018|KERN", "content_hash": "9225cdb56cbde3c9", "measure_id": "201200018", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that extends the period an employee has to appeal a disciplinary action, such as dismissal, suspension, or reduction in rank or compensation, from five (5) business days to ten (10) business days?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65546, "no_votes": 33858, "total_votes": 99404, "percent_yes": 65.93900000000001, "percent_no": 34.06099999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.133695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.995314", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that extends the period an employee has to appeal a disciplinary action, such as dismissal, suspension, or reduction in rank or compensation, from five (5) business days to ten (10) business days?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5733, "fingerprint": "2012|201200019|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200019|KERN", "content_hash": "99813e7c6491d86c", "measure_id": "201200019", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a County zoning ordinance be adopted that amends Title 19 of the Ordinance Code to restrict the location of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries to Medium (M-2 PD) and Heavy (M-3 PD) Industrial Districts and to require them to maintain a distance of at least one (1) mile from all schools, daycare centers, parks, churches, and other Medical Marijuana Dispensaries, and to require them to operate in compliance with development and performance standards?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 69530, "no_votes": 31168, "total_votes": 100698, "percent_yes": 69.048, "percent_no": 30.951999999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.134191", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.995556", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a County zoning ordinance be adopted that amends Title 19 of the Ordinance Code to restrict the location of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries to Medium (M-2 PD) and Heavy (M-3 PD) Industrial Districts and to require them to maintain a distance of at least one (1) mile from all schools, daycare centers, parks, churches, and other Medical Marijuana Dispensaries, and to require them to operate in compliance with development and performance standards?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5735, "fingerprint": "2012|201200130|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200130|KERN", "content_hash": "75c254ac02861738", "measure_id": "201200130", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 2-2.101 of the Ridgecrest Municipal Code be amended and re-enacted to impose term limits of eight (8) consecutive years on city council members and mayor, and a two (2) year bar before holding either office thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4346, "no_votes": 1527, "total_votes": 5873, "percent_yes": 73.9997, "percent_no": 26.000299999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.134799", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.995948", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 2-2.101 of the Ridgecrest Municipal Code be amended and re-enacted to impose term limits of eight (8) consecutive years on city council members and mayor, and a two (2) year bar before holding either office thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5736, "fingerprint": "2012|201200131|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200131|KERN", "content_hash": "51bc78433c3b3a90", "measure_id": "201200131", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3492, "no_votes": 2318, "total_votes": 5810, "percent_yes": 60.1033, "percent_no": 39.8967, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.135090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.996130", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5737, "fingerprint": "2012|201200132|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200132|KERN", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "201200132", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3832, "no_votes": 1926, "total_votes": 5758, "percent_yes": 66.5509, "percent_no": 33.4491, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.135373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.996311", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5738, "fingerprint": "2012|201200133|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200133|KERN", "content_hash": "0c7dfbb98e66fa94", "measure_id": "201200133", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Ridgecrest Public Safety/Essential City Services Measure. To help prevent additional cuts and maintain City of Ridgecrest services, including: city streets and pothole repair; police officers and neighborhood police patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response times; and crime prevention and investigation; and other city services, shall the City of Ridgecrest enact a 3/4 cent sales tax, for five (5) years, requiring a citizen's oversight committee, annual independent audits, with all funds for City of Ridgecrest services only, no funds for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3331, "no_votes": 2668, "total_votes": 5999, "percent_yes": 55.52589999999999, "percent_no": 44.47410000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.135663", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.996582", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Ridgecrest Public Safety/Essential City Services Measure. To help prevent additional cuts and maintain City of Ridgecrest services, including: city streets and pothole repair; police officers and neighborhood police patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response times; and crime prevention and investigation; and other city services, shall the City of Ridgecrest enact a 3/4 cent sales tax, for five (5) years, requiring a citizen's oversight committee, annual independent audits, with all funds for City of Ridgecrest services only, no funds for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11404, "fingerprint": "2012|201200370|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200370|KERN", "content_hash": "8ca11567e6b281ce", "measure_id": "201200370", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce student overcrowding, acquire, construct and improve new and existing classrooms, support facilities and new elementary school, expand high school facilities, upgrade vocational education facilities to better prepare students for the workforce, and make improvements to save money better spent in the classroom, shall the McFarland Unified School District be authorized to issue $25,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Oversight Committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1238, "no_votes": 426, "total_votes": 1664, "percent_yes": 74.399, "percent_no": 25.601, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.012123", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.137204", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.997524", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce student overcrowding, acquire, construct and improve new and existing classrooms, support facilities and new elementary school, expand high school facilities, upgrade vocational education facilities to better prepare students for the workforce, and make improvements to save money better spent in the classroom, shall the McFarland Unified School District be authorized to issue $25,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Oversight Committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11403, "fingerprint": "2012|201200134|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200134|KERN", "content_hash": "56e7dbb0005cf0f7", "measure_id": "201200134", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance enacting new section 2-2.105 of the Ridgecrest Municipal Code to allow electors to directly elect a mayor and four city councilmen be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3822, "no_votes": 2013, "total_votes": 5835, "percent_yes": 65.5013, "percent_no": 34.4987, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.011325", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.135978", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.996770", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance enacting new section 2-2.105 of the Ridgecrest Municipal Code to allow electors to directly elect a mayor and four city councilmen be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5729, "fingerprint": "2012|201200129|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200129|KERN", "content_hash": "c967835e9d1b5825", "measure_id": "201200129", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a city-wide special tax of up to $150.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of ten (10) fiscal years beginning July 1, 2012, for (1) police operations, training and supplies, personnel, equipment, law enforcement, dispatch, code enforcement, and animal control, and (2) fire prevention and suppression operations, training and supplies, firefighter and paramedic personnel, equipment and supplies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1517, "no_votes": 703, "total_votes": 2220, "percent_yes": 68.3333, "percent_no": 31.666700000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-03-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.132890", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.994779", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a city-wide special tax of up to $150.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of ten (10) fiscal years beginning July 1, 2012, for (1) police operations, training and supplies, personnel, equipment, law enforcement, dispatch, code enforcement, and animal control, and (2) fire prevention and suppression operations, training and supplies, firefighter and paramedic personnel, equipment and supplies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5742, "fingerprint": "2012|201200371|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200371|KERN", "content_hash": "45f0a12a612544dc", "measure_id": "201200371", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality academic programs, school facilities, and activities that provide improved college and career pathways, maintain effective student to teacher ratios, and help offset severe state budge cuts, shall the Mojave Unified School District levy a parcel tax in the amount of $42 to be levied annually for a period of five years, with mandatory audits, no money for administrative salaries, an exemption for seniors, age 65 and over, and all dollars staying in our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2322, "no_votes": 2158, "total_votes": 4480, "percent_yes": 51.8304, "percent_no": 48.1696, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.137477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.997711", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality academic programs, school facilities, and activities that provide improved college and career pathways, maintain effective student to teacher ratios, and help offset severe state budge cuts, shall the Mojave Unified School District levy a parcel tax in the amount of $42 to be levied annually for a period of five years, with mandatory audits, no money for administrative salaries, an exemption for seniors, age 65 and over, and all dollars staying in our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5740, "fingerprint": "2012|201200369|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200369|KERN", "content_hash": "670cc7d8a5c8cb69", "measure_id": "201200369", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; construct new classrooms and science labs to maintain small class sizes; improve student access to computers and modern technology; improve P.E. fields and facilities; and replace deteriorating water, plumbing and sewer systems; shall the Elk Hills School District issue $6,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries, regular, ongoing maintenance, or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65, "no_votes": 77, "total_votes": 142, "percent_yes": 45.7746, "percent_no": 54.2254, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.136655", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.997133", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; construct new classrooms and science labs to maintain small class sizes; improve student access to computers and modern technology; improve P.E. fields and facilities; and replace deteriorating water, plumbing and sewer systems; shall the Elk Hills School District issue $6,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries, regular, ongoing maintenance, or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5743, "fingerprint": "2012|201200372|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200372|KERN", "content_hash": "71e7cf99a18a8601", "measure_id": "201200372", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect the quality of education and enhance student learning in neighborhood elementary schools, shall Panama-Buena Vista Union School District modernize school technology, upgrade safety/security systems, improve energy efficiency, rehabilitate outdated classrooms, repair/replace deteriorated roofs, plumbing, electrical, lighting, ventilation, and acquire, construct, equip, and renovate sites, facilities, and equipment, by issuing $147,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, mandatory audits, no administrators' salaries/pensions, and all funds dedicated locally to Panama-Buena Vista Union School District K-8 schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23690, "no_votes": 12757, "total_votes": 36447, "percent_yes": 64.9985, "percent_no": 35.00149999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.137745", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.997891", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of education and enhance student learning in neighborhood elementary schools, shall Panama-Buena Vista Union School District modernize school technology, upgrade safety/security systems, improve energy efficiency, rehabilitate outdated classrooms, repair/replace deteriorated roofs, plumbing, electrical, lighting, ventilation, and acquire, construct, equip, and renovate sites, facilities, and equipment, by issuing $147,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, mandatory audits, no administrators' salaries/pensions, and all funds dedicated locally to Panama-Buena Vista Union School District K-8 schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5744, "fingerprint": "2012|201200373|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200373|KERN", "content_hash": "30f977b937dc928e", "measure_id": "201200373", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, modernize and construct classrooms / facilities at Highland, Standard, and Wingland Elementary and Standard Middle; upgrade heating, ventilation, airconditioning systems; and reduce borrowing costs, shall $11,200,000 of Standard School District bonds, approved by voters in June 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4179, "no_votes": 1744, "total_votes": 5923, "percent_yes": 70.55550000000001, "percent_no": 29.44449999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.138013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.998070", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, modernize and construct classrooms / facilities at Highland, Standard, and Wingland Elementary and Standard Middle; upgrade heating, ventilation, airconditioning systems; and reduce borrowing costs, shall $11,200,000 of Standard School District bonds, approved by voters in June 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5741, "fingerprint": "2012|201200135|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200135|KERN", "content_hash": "572ce929c18a4e3d", "measure_id": "201200135", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be enacted in the City of Maricopa an additional temporary sales tax rate increase of one percent (1%) which will end after ten (10) years, the proceeds of which shall be used to preserve essential general governmental services including, but not limited to street and road improvements, police and fire protection, parks and recreation and other City General Fund Services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97, "no_votes": 184, "total_votes": 281, "percent_yes": 34.5196, "percent_no": 65.4804, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.136930", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.997316", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be enacted in the City of Maricopa an additional temporary sales tax rate increase of one percent (1%) which will end after ten (10) years, the proceeds of which shall be used to preserve essential general governmental services including, but not limited to street and road improvements, police and fire protection, parks and recreation and other City General Fund Services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5745, "fingerprint": "2012|201200136|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200136|KERN", "content_hash": "97521ef58ce6619b", "measure_id": "201200136", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 571, "no_votes": 1282, "total_votes": 1853, "percent_yes": 30.8149, "percent_no": 69.1851, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.138289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.998252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5748, "fingerprint": "2012|201200376|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200376|KINGS", "content_hash": "619195b1ce685fba", "measure_id": "201200376", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, equip/construct classrooms/college facilities, upgrade computer/technology systems for student access, and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $12,655,000 of West Hills Community College District School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 bonds, approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for any salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5124, "no_votes": 3676, "total_votes": 8800, "percent_yes": 58.22730000000001, "percent_no": 41.77269999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.139158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.998796", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, equip/construct classrooms/college facilities, upgrade computer/technology systems for student access, and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $12,655,000 of West Hills Community College District School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 bonds, approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for any salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5747, "fingerprint": "2012|201200375|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200375|KINGS", "content_hash": "c687115f067ce887", "measure_id": "201200375", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; increase energy efficiency by installing solar panels; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Reef-Sunset Unified School District issue $10,830,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 376, "no_votes": 75, "total_votes": 451, "percent_yes": 83.3703, "percent_no": 16.6297, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.138888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.998617", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace outdated heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; increase energy efficiency by installing solar panels; and upgrade P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the Reef-Sunset Unified School District issue $10,830,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5746, "fingerprint": "2012|201200374|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200374|KINGS", "content_hash": "1239df35c2a16664", "measure_id": "201200374", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the qualityof education by modernizing/renovating all school in Corcoran, make energy efficientcy improvements, upgrade outdated plumbing, electrical, heatin/air-conditioning systems, make health and safety improvements, replace worn-out temporary portables with new classrooms, shall Corcoran Unified School District renovate, upgrade, acquire, construct/equip classrooms, facilities/sites by issuing $9,000,000 of bonds at legal rates with independent citizens' oversight, NO money taken by the state or administrators' salaries and all funds staying in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 521, "no_votes": 702, "total_votes": 1223, "percent_yes": 42.6002, "percent_no": 57.3998, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.138557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.998433", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the qualityof education by modernizing/renovating all school in Corcoran, make energy efficientcy improvements, upgrade outdated plumbing, electrical, heatin/air-conditioning systems, make health and safety improvements, replace worn-out temporary portables with new classrooms, shall Corcoran Unified School District renovate, upgrade, acquire, construct/equip classrooms, facilities/sites by issuing $9,000,000 of bonds at legal rates with independent citizens' oversight, NO money taken by the state or administrators' salaries and all funds staying in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5749, "fingerprint": "2012|201200020|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200020|LAKE", "content_hash": "12d4ad0929b6787d", "measure_id": "201200020", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance titled \"The Lake County Medical Marijuana Cultivation Act of 2012\", an ordinance amending Chapter 21 of the Ordinance Code of the County of Lake, adding Article 72A: Regulations for the Cultivation of Medical Marijuana be adopted and become effective?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4688, "no_votes": 8960, "total_votes": 13648, "percent_yes": 34.3494, "percent_no": 65.6506, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.139424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.998978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance titled \"The Lake County Medical Marijuana Cultivation Act of 2012\", an ordinance amending Chapter 21 of the Ordinance Code of the County of Lake, adding Article 72A: Regulations for the Cultivation of Medical Marijuana be adopted and become effective?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5751, "fingerprint": "2012|201200021|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200021|LAKE", "content_hash": "55febb55a5a32ab5", "measure_id": "201200021", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article VI be added to Chapter 18 of the Lake County Code imposing a one-half of one percent (0.50%) transaction and use tax (sales tax) to implement invasive species/weed and algae control/water quality programs for the County of Lake for a maximum period of ten (10) years that cannot be taken by the State, with all revenues dedicated exclusively to these programs and establishing an expenditure plan with citizen oversight for revenues generated?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14165, "no_votes": 8325, "total_votes": 22490, "percent_yes": 62.98350000000001, "percent_no": 37.01649999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.140015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.999343", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article VI be added to Chapter 18 of the Lake County Code imposing a one-half of one percent (0.50%) transaction and use tax (sales tax) to implement invasive species/weed and algae control/water quality programs for the County of Lake for a maximum period of ten (10) years that cannot be taken by the State, with all revenues dedicated exclusively to these programs and establishing an expenditure plan with citizen oversight for revenues generated?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5750, "fingerprint": "2012|201200137|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200137|LAKE", "content_hash": "93796d94a2ab8737", "measure_id": "201200137", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Clearlake impose a retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one percent (1%) within th City to be used for repair and maintenance of City streets and roads and other transportation services and code enforcement, and shall the appropriations limit for the City of Clearlake for roadway repair and maintenance and code enforcement be incraesed for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 by the amount of the tax proceeds recieved by the City during that period.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2217, "no_votes": 1375, "total_votes": 3592, "percent_yes": 61.7205, "percent_no": 38.2795, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.139693", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.999163", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Clearlake impose a retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one percent (1%) within th City to be used for repair and maintenance of City streets and roads and other transportation services and code enforcement, and shall the appropriations limit for the City of Clearlake for roadway repair and maintenance and code enforcement be incraesed for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 by the amount of the tax proceeds recieved by the City during that period.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5752, "fingerprint": "2012|201200022|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200022|LASSEN", "content_hash": "773b502236856244", "measure_id": "201200022", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the existing special tax be repealed and replaced by a special property tax for fire suppression, prevention, rescue and emergency medical services within the Spalding\r\nCommunity Services District, as established by resolution 2012-4 be approved?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66, "no_votes": 80, "total_votes": 146, "percent_yes": 45.2055, "percent_no": 54.7945, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.140288", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.999527", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing special tax be repealed and replaced by a special property tax for fire suppression, prevention, rescue and emergency medical services within the Spalding\r\nCommunity Services District, as established by resolution 2012-4 be approved?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5788, "fingerprint": "2012|201200163|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200163|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7aff38f005707407", "measure_id": "201200163", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Brenda Esqueda be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4453, "no_votes": 793, "total_votes": 5246, "percent_yes": 84.88369999999999, "percent_no": 15.11630000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.154799", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.008349", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Brenda Esqueda be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5757, "fingerprint": "2012|201200144|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200144|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "638a27e23829eaec", "measure_id": "201200144", "measure_letter": "12-1", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted amending the City's existing utility Users' Tax to continue the existing 10% tax, subject to potential increase of 12% on July 1, 2013, in otder to maintain general City services such as public safety services, including paramedic programs, and to reflect technological advances in communications, continue existing exemptions to low and very low income households, establish new sunset dates and continue a citizen's oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1008, "no_votes": 1553, "total_votes": 2561, "percent_yes": 39.3596, "percent_no": 60.6404, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.142226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.000794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted amending the City's existing utility Users' Tax to continue the existing 10% tax, subject to potential increase of 12% on July 1, 2013, in otder to maintain general City services such as public safety services, including paramedic programs, and to reflect technological advances in communications, continue existing exemptions to low and very low income households, establish new sunset dates and continue a citizen's oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5758, "fingerprint": "2012|201200143|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200143|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "72fe7c06de4c06a6", "measure_id": "201200143", "measure_letter": "12-2", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure 12-1 to continue the existing Utility Users' Tax of 10%, subject to a potential increase to 12% in July 1, 2013 and establishing new sunset dates, is approved by the voters, should the additional revenue generated by that tax be used to fund public safety services, including paramedic programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1067, "no_votes": 1413, "total_votes": 2480, "percent_yes": 43.0242, "percent_no": 56.9758, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.142492", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.000980", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure 12-1 to continue the existing Utility Users' Tax of 10%, subject to a potential increase to 12% in July 1, 2013 and establishing new sunset dates, is approved by the voters, should the additional revenue generated by that tax be used to fund public safety services, including paramedic programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5789, "fingerprint": "2012|201200164|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200164|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fa73f36785adbe95", "measure_id": "201200164", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Mario F. Hernandez be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4419, "no_votes": 685, "total_votes": 5104, "percent_yes": 86.5792, "percent_no": 13.4208, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.155079", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.008533", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Mario F. Hernandez be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5790, "fingerprint": "2012|201200165|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200165|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dc73b9ba0b1eb836", "measure_id": "201200165", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Maribel de la Torre be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4451, "no_votes": 757, "total_votes": 5208, "percent_yes": 85.46470000000001, "percent_no": 14.535299999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.155357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.008711", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Maribel de la Torre be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5767, "fingerprint": "2012|201200149|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200149|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "98e3f364d9a02a90", "measure_id": "201200149", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance imposing a one half of one percent (\u00bd%) transactions and use (sales) tax to offset severe state budget cuts and provide funding for such things as police and fire service, repair, maintenance and improvement of streets, sidewalks, public facilities, parks,\r\nlibraries and other city services, with all revenues staying in the city and spending reviewed by a citizens\u2019 advisory panel and independently audited, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2475, "no_votes": 1184, "total_votes": 3659, "percent_yes": 67.64139999999999, "percent_no": 32.35860000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.146017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.003185", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance imposing a one half of one percent (\u00bd%) transactions and use (sales) tax to offset severe state budget cuts and provide funding for such things as police and fire service, repair, maintenance and improvement of streets, sidewalks, public facilities, parks,\r\nlibraries and other city services, with all revenues staying in the city and spending reviewed by a citizens\u2019 advisory panel and independently audited, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5793, "fingerprint": "2012|201200167|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200167|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "30c88ae96c3d3553", "measure_id": "201200167", "measure_letter": "ALF", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to amend Sierra Madre Municipal Code Section 17.35.040 (\u201cCore Density Limit\u201d) of the People\u2019s Empowerment Act (aka Measure V) to permit development of an assisted living facility consistent with the Kensington Assisted Living Facility Specific Plan not exceeding two stories, thirty feet in height and seventy-five assisted living suites, for the parcels located at 33 North Hermosa Avenue an 245 West Sierra Madre Boulevard?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4669, "no_votes": 1345, "total_votes": 6014, "percent_yes": 77.63550000000001, "percent_no": 22.364499999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.156280", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.009249", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to amend Sierra Madre Municipal Code Section 17.35.040 (\u201cCore Density Limit\u201d) of the People\u2019s Empowerment Act (aka Measure V) to permit development of an assisted living facility consistent with the Kensington Assisted Living Facility Specific Plan not exceeding two stories, thirty feet in height and seventy-five assisted living suites, for the parcels located at 33 North Hermosa Avenue an 245 West Sierra Madre Boulevard?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11414, "fingerprint": "2012|201200027|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200027|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ec6120606b421356", "measure_id": "201200027", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring producers of adult films to obtain a County public health permit, to require adult film performers to use condoms while engaged in sex acts, to provide proof of blood borne pathogen training course, to post permit and notices to performers, and making violations of the ordinance subject to civil fines and criminal charges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1617866, "no_votes": 1222681, "total_votes": 2840547, "percent_yes": 56.9561, "percent_no": 43.0439, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.021456", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.150969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.006117", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring producers of adult films to obtain a County public health permit, to require adult film performers to use condoms while engaged in sex acts, to provide proof of blood borne pathogen training course, to post permit and notices to performers, and making violations of the ordinance subject to civil fines and criminal charges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5760, "fingerprint": "2012|201200145|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200145|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "53d479dccebe097a", "measure_id": "201200145", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that each member of the City Council (except for the mayor) be elected by his or her home district and only by the registered voters of that district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3563, "no_votes": 1970, "total_votes": 5533, "percent_yes": 64.39540000000001, "percent_no": 35.60459999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.143085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.001342", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that each member of the City Council (except for the mayor) be elected by his or her home district and only by the registered voters of that district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5764, "fingerprint": "2012|201200380|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200380|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5e73dde97547f905", "measure_id": "201200380", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To expand vocational education facilities, upgrade classroom computer technology; repair, equip, and construct classrooms/facilities at Baxter, Foster, Intensive Learning Center, Jefferson, Las Flores, Lindstrom, Pyle, Ramona, Washington, Williams, and Woodruff Elementary and Bellflower, Mayfair, and Somerset High Schools, shall Bellflower Unified School District issue $79,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16469, "no_votes": 6155, "total_votes": 22624, "percent_yes": 72.79440000000001, "percent_no": 27.20559999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.145119", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.002634", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand vocational education facilities, upgrade classroom computer technology; repair, equip, and construct classrooms/facilities at Baxter, Foster, Intensive Learning Center, Jefferson, Las Flores, Lindstrom, Pyle, Ramona, Washington, Williams, and Woodruff Elementary and Bellflower, Mayfair, and Somerset High Schools, shall Bellflower Unified School District issue $79,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5771, "fingerprint": "2012|201200152|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200152|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3253c0da457ed77e", "measure_id": "201200152", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the Sugary Sweetened Beverage License Fee ballot measure passes on November 6, 2012, the new tax revenues should be used primarily to pay for the following\r\npublic services: police and fire emergency services; parks and recreation programs including new sports fields; health and wellness programs for children and senior citizens; and other projects to prevent and treat diabetes and childhood obesity.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10389, "no_votes": 6620, "total_votes": 17009, "percent_yes": 61.07939999999999, "percent_no": 38.92060000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.147386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.004105", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the Sugary Sweetened Beverage License Fee ballot measure passes on November 6, 2012, the new tax revenues should be used primarily to pay for the following\r\npublic services: police and fire emergency services; parks and recreation programs including new sports fields; health and wellness programs for children and senior citizens; and other projects to prevent and treat diabetes and childhood obesity.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5768, "fingerprint": "2012|201200383|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200383|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fe347a0c908b8f0f", "measure_id": "201200383", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare students for college and good-paying careers by upgrading classrooms, science labs, and instructional technology needed for improved teaching, repair/replace leaky roofs, worn-out floors, plumbing and faulty electrical systems, acquire/construct/renovate sites/facilities/equipment to meet modern academic standards; improve energy efficiency saving money and supporting instruction, shall Covina-Valley Unified School District issue $129,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17640, "no_votes": 6491, "total_votes": 24131, "percent_yes": 73.101, "percent_no": 26.899, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.146289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.003372", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare students for college and good-paying careers by upgrading classrooms, science labs, and instructional technology needed for improved teaching, repair/replace leaky roofs, worn-out floors, plumbing and faulty electrical systems, acquire/construct/renovate sites/facilities/equipment to meet modern academic standards; improve energy efficiency saving money and supporting instruction, shall Covina-Valley Unified School District issue $129,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5763, "fingerprint": "2012|201200379|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200379|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cb82999b71a8e79f", "measure_id": "201200379", "measure_letter": "CK", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing current tax rates to provide quality education in Canyon Country elementary schools, safe, modern classrooms for students, including medically-fragile,\r\ndisabled students, shall Sulphur Springs Union School District upgrade classrooms, libraries, science labs, old roofs, support classroom instruction in core subjects (reading, writing, math, science) by reducing debt, update technology for 21st century skills, upgrade, acquire, construct classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment by issuing $72,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4394, "no_votes": 3071, "total_votes": 7465, "percent_yes": 58.8614, "percent_no": 41.1386, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.144239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.002081", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing current tax rates to provide quality education in Canyon Country elementary schools, safe, modern classrooms for students, including medically-fragile,\r\ndisabled students, shall Sulphur Springs Union School District upgrade classrooms, libraries, science labs, old roofs, support classroom instruction in core subjects (reading, writing, math, science) by reducing debt, update technology for 21st century skills, upgrade, acquire, construct classrooms, sites, facilities/equipment by issuing $72,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5776, "fingerprint": "2012|201200025|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200025|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "57cb7d6abf50a30a", "measure_id": "201200025", "measure_letter": "CL", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect academic quality in local K-12 schools; maintain math, science, English programs; provide education for students with disabilities/special needs; support computer technology and school security; prepare students for college/careers; retain excellent teachers; shall Local Classrooms Funding Authority levy a special tax of 2\u00a2/square foot of lot for residential property, and 7.5\u00a2/square foot for other property types; requiring citizens oversight, audits, senior exemptions, no money for administrator salaries and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26631, "no_votes": 11186, "total_votes": 37817, "percent_yes": 70.4207, "percent_no": 29.579300000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.149853", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.005565", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect academic quality in local K-12 schools; maintain math, science, English programs; provide education for students with disabilities/special needs; support computer technology and school security; prepare students for college/careers; retain excellent teachers; shall Local Classrooms Funding Authority levy a special tax of 2\u00a2/square foot of lot for residential property, and 7.5\u00a2/square foot for other property types; requiring citizens oversight, audits, senior exemptions, no money for administrator salaries and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5759, "fingerprint": "2012|201200378|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200378|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7086b15a1ad8f3ce", "measure_id": "201200378", "measure_letter": "CO", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality local schools with funding Sacramento cannot take away, upgrade classrooms/libraries/science labs/computers/technology, improve energy efficiency to save money to retain qualified teachers and protect core academic instruction, improve access for students with disabilities, improve fire/security systems for student safety, and upgrade/construct/acquire school facilities/sites/classrooms/equipment, shall Charter Oak\r\nUnified School District issue $47,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight/audits and without increasing current tax rate limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3035, "no_votes": 1804, "total_votes": 4839, "percent_yes": 62.7196, "percent_no": 37.2804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.142816", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.001160", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality local schools with funding Sacramento cannot take away, upgrade classrooms/libraries/science labs/computers/technology, improve energy efficiency to save money to retain qualified teachers and protect core academic instruction, improve access for students with disabilities, improve fire/security systems for student safety, and upgrade/construct/acquire school facilities/sites/classrooms/equipment, shall Charter Oak\r\nUnified School District issue $47,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight/audits and without increasing current tax rate limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11410, "fingerprint": "2012|201200151|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200151|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "11e3fb98a64fc892", "measure_id": "201200151", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the tax on telecommunication services from 5% to 4.8%; modernize the ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used; and to preserve funding of general City services, such as police, fire protection, street maintenance;\r\nand for parks and recreation, library and senior citizen programs; subject to an annual independent audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23807, "no_votes": 6027, "total_votes": 29834, "percent_yes": 79.7982, "percent_no": 20.201800000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.018859", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.146830", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.003736", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the tax on telecommunication services from 5% to 4.8%; modernize the ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used; and to preserve funding of general City services, such as police, fire protection, street maintenance;\r\nand for parks and recreation, library and senior citizen programs; subject to an annual independent audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5755, "fingerprint": "2012|201200139|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200139|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6291a60df7169cde", "measure_id": "201200139", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the Arcadia Municipal Code to extend the period of occupancy subject to the Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax from 30 days to 90 days, and to apply the Tax to all rent charged by hotel operators, including online travel companies, for the transient occupancy of any hotel room, be adopted to help preserve general City services such as police and fire protection, street operations and maintenance, and library, parks and recreation services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4219, "no_votes": 1133, "total_votes": 5352, "percent_yes": 78.8303, "percent_no": 21.169700000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.141094", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.000070", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the Arcadia Municipal Code to extend the period of occupancy subject to the Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax from 30 days to 90 days, and to apply the Tax to all rent charged by hotel operators, including online travel companies, for the transient occupancy of any hotel room, be adopted to help preserve general City services such as police and fire protection, street operations and maintenance, and library, parks and recreation services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5781, "fingerprint": "2012|201200390|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200390|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2a7b335c0c961929", "measure_id": "201200390", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/improve aging schools, improve math/science instruction and protect education in Palmdale elementary and intermediate schools with local funding that cannot be taken by State government, shall Palmdale School District repair leaking roofs, rusting plumbing and aging restrooms; update science labs, computers and instructional technology; upgrade/repair/add classrooms to meet safety, health and academic standards; by issuing $220 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22328, "no_votes": 7834, "total_votes": 30162, "percent_yes": 74.0269, "percent_no": 25.973100000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.152192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.006860", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/improve aging schools, improve math/science instruction and protect education in Palmdale elementary and intermediate schools with local funding that cannot be taken by State government, shall Palmdale School District repair leaking roofs, rusting plumbing and aging restrooms; update science labs, computers and instructional technology; upgrade/repair/add classrooms to meet safety, health and academic standards; by issuing $220 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5770, "fingerprint": "2012|201200384|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200384|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "938c8b3ab4cb3921", "measure_id": "201200384", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for universities/transfer/jobs, including nursing, healthcare, fire-fighting and high-tech jobs, by expanding science labs, upgrading outdated electrical systems, wiring green energy for savings, building earthquake/fire-safe classrooms equipped with up-to-date technology, improving facilities for Veterans, acquiring, constructing, repairing facilities, sites/equipment, shall El Camino Community College District issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring all funds remain local, financial audits, citizen\u2019s oversight, and NO money for pensions/administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 129939, "no_votes": 60417, "total_votes": 190356, "percent_yes": 68.26100000000001, "percent_no": 31.73899999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.147113", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.003916", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for universities/transfer/jobs, including nursing, healthcare, fire-fighting and high-tech jobs, by expanding science labs, upgrading outdated electrical systems, wiring green energy for savings, building earthquake/fire-safe classrooms equipped with up-to-date technology, improving facilities for Veterans, acquiring, constructing, repairing facilities, sites/equipment, shall El Camino Community College District issue $350,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring all funds remain local, financial audits, citizen\u2019s oversight, and NO money for pensions/administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5774, "fingerprint": "2012|201200387|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200387|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "438ea38808ace25d", "measure_id": "201200387", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local schools by renovating old and outdated classrooms, restrooms, upgrading science labs and computer systems to keep pace with technology, improving student safety and security systems, repairing, constructing, acquiring classrooms, school facilities and equipment, and to remove hazardous materials and improve student safety and security systems shall Little Lake City School District issue $18,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8041, "no_votes": 2430, "total_votes": 10471, "percent_yes": 76.793, "percent_no": 23.206999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.149176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.005197", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local schools by renovating old and outdated classrooms, restrooms, upgrading science labs and computer systems to keep pace with technology, improving student safety and security systems, repairing, constructing, acquiring classrooms, school facilities and equipment, and to remove hazardous materials and improve student safety and security systems shall Little Lake City School District issue $18,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5792, "fingerprint": "2012|201200393|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200393|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0bf768907d358dcb", "measure_id": "201200393", "measure_letter": "ES", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve academic instruction and school safety by modernizing high school classrooms and campuses, repairing aging elementary schools, ensuring every school\r\nmeets current earthquake and fire safety standards to protect students, and constructing, acquiring, modernizing, and/or repairing classrooms, sites, facilities, equipment, computers, and learning technology to raise student achievement, shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District issue $385,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent fiscal oversight, mandatory audits, and all funds for Santa Monica and Malibu schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29874, "no_votes": 14018, "total_votes": 43892, "percent_yes": 68.0625, "percent_no": 31.9375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.155985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.009069", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve academic instruction and school safety by modernizing high school classrooms and campuses, repairing aging elementary schools, ensuring every school\r\nmeets current earthquake and fire safety standards to protect students, and constructing, acquiring, modernizing, and/or repairing classrooms, sites, facilities, equipment, computers, and learning technology to raise student achievement, shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District issue $385,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent fiscal oversight, mandatory audits, and all funds for Santa Monica and Malibu schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5772, "fingerprint": "2012|201200153|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200153|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fe71be1adc1d2fc9", "measure_id": "201200153", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance adopted by the voters in April 1990 be repealed in order to allow the City Council to investigate the reasonableness of rent charged to mobilehome owners and if appropriate, consider the regulation of proposed mobilehome park rent increases in the future?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8710, "no_votes": 8639, "total_votes": 17349, "percent_yes": 50.2046, "percent_no": 49.7954, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.147784", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.004285", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance adopted by the voters in April 1990 be repealed in order to allow the City Council to investigate the reasonableness of rent charged to mobilehome owners and if appropriate, consider the regulation of proposed mobilehome park rent increases in the future?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5766, "fingerprint": "2012|201200382|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200382|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c409cdfcfa0a2b48", "measure_id": "201200382", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare local Cerritos College students for high-skilled jobs and 4-year universities by updating classrooms, technology, math, science and computer labs, upgrading job-training facilities, providing classrooms and labs to accommodate growing demand, replacing leaky roofs, aging and unsafe buildings, facilities/equipment, and acquiring, constructing, repairing buildings, classrooms, sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cerritos Community College District issue $350,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, and no money for Sacramento, administrators\u2019 salaries or employee pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83524, "no_votes": 35234, "total_votes": 118758, "percent_yes": 70.3313, "percent_no": 29.6687, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.145665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.002995", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare local Cerritos College students for high-skilled jobs and 4-year universities by updating classrooms, technology, math, science and computer labs, upgrading job-training facilities, providing classrooms and labs to accommodate growing demand, replacing leaky roofs, aging and unsafe buildings, facilities/equipment, and acquiring, constructing, repairing buildings, classrooms, sites/facilities/equipment, shall Cerritos Community College District issue $350,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, and no money for Sacramento, administrators\u2019 salaries or employee pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5791, "fingerprint": "2012|201200166|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200166|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "eb3bbee84891bcc5", "measure_id": "201200166", "measure_letter": "GA", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to allow the annual rent control general adjustment to be based on 75% of the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, but limited to an adjustment between 0% and 6%; and to give the Rent Control Board discretion, after a public hearing, to impose a dollar limit, within the 0-6% range, calculated using the same formula employed when imposing a limit under the existing general adjustment formula?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18650, "no_votes": 12166, "total_votes": 30816, "percent_yes": 60.5205, "percent_no": 39.4795, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.155637", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.008889", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to allow the annual rent control general adjustment to be based on 75% of the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, but limited to an adjustment between 0% and 6%; and to give the Rent Control Board discretion, after a public hearing, to impose a dollar limit, within the 0-6% range, calculated using the same formula employed when imposing a limit under the existing general adjustment formula?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5773, "fingerprint": "2012|201200385|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200385|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2906480afd7a45e5", "measure_id": "201200385", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; make health/safety improvements; replace old roofs; modernize/upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and technology; improve energy efficiency; upgrade inadequate electrical and plumbing systems; construct new classrooms; and qualify the District for over $20,000,000 in state grants shall Inglewood Unified School District issue $90,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent oversight committee and NO money taken by the state or for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31907, "no_votes": 5152, "total_votes": 37059, "percent_yes": 86.0978, "percent_no": 13.902199999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.148327", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.004647", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; make health/safety improvements; replace old roofs; modernize/upgrade classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and technology; improve energy efficiency; upgrade inadequate electrical and plumbing systems; construct new classrooms; and qualify the District for over $20,000,000 in state grants shall Inglewood Unified School District issue $90,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent oversight committee and NO money taken by the state or for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11411, "fingerprint": "2012|201200154|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200154|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5c06b617f1ab0fd3", "measure_id": "201200154", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset budget cuts and maintain City general fund services, shall an ordinance be adopted implementing a business license fee of one (1) cent per fluid ounce of sugar sweetened beverage served/provided/traded by businesses in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4428, "no_votes": 14137, "total_votes": 18565, "percent_yes": 23.8513, "percent_no": 76.1487, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.019651", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.148055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.004468", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset budget cuts and maintain City general fund services, shall an ordinance be adopted implementing a business license fee of one (1) cent per fluid ounce of sugar sweetened beverage served/provided/traded by businesses in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5761, "fingerprint": "2012|201200023|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200023|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e8dfa7136af500a7", "measure_id": "201200023", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the existing unincorporated county hotel room tax be readopted to ratify, continue, and update the existing ordinance at the current rate of 12 percent to fund essential\r\nCounty general fund services, such as parks, libraries, senior services, and law enforcement; to continue exempting hotel stays longer than 30 days, to add exemptions for emergency shelter referrals, and for individuals on official government business pursuant to federal law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 522354, "no_votes": 338288, "total_votes": 860642, "percent_yes": 60.6935, "percent_no": 39.3065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.143352", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.001527", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing unincorporated county hotel room tax be readopted to ratify, continue, and update the existing ordinance at the current rate of 12 percent to fund essential\r\nCounty general fund services, such as parks, libraries, senior services, and law enforcement; to continue exempting hotel stays longer than 30 days, to add exemptions for emergency shelter referrals, and for individuals on official government business pursuant to federal law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5779, "fingerprint": "2012|201200028|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200028|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b61cb4ae65497866", "measure_id": "201200028", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To advance Los Angeles County\u2019s traffic relief, economic/job growth by accelerating light rail/subway construction and airport connections, within five years, not twenty; funding\r\ncountywide freeway, bridge, safety and traffic flow improvements; fixing potholes; keeping senior, student, disabled fares low; Shall Los Angeles County\u2019s voter-approved one-half cent traffic relief sales tax continue without increase for another 30 years or until voters decide to end it, with independent audits and keeping funds local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1893340, "no_votes": 970611, "total_votes": 2863951, "percent_yes": 66.1094, "percent_no": 33.890600000000006, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.151275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.006301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To advance Los Angeles County\u2019s traffic relief, economic/job growth by accelerating light rail/subway construction and airport connections, within five years, not twenty; funding\r\ncountywide freeway, bridge, safety and traffic flow improvements; fixing potholes; keeping senior, student, disabled fares low; Shall Los Angeles County\u2019s voter-approved one-half cent traffic relief sales tax continue without increase for another 30 years or until voters decide to end it, with independent audits and keeping funds local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5780, "fingerprint": "2012|201200389|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200389|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ac6258aaac1bf9d9", "measure_id": "201200389", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve and maintain neighborhood schools by repairing and updating classrooms, science labs and technology, repairing leaky roofs, bathrooms, plumbing, and electrical, improving school safety with lighting, fences, fire alarms, and earthquake retrofits, removing asbestos, replacing portables with permanent classrooms, renovating, constructing, and equipping, modernizing school facilities, shall Lynwood Unified School District issue $93,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring strict accountability, Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee review, independent annual audits, with no funds for administrator salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7719, "no_votes": 5733, "total_votes": 13452, "percent_yes": 57.381800000000005, "percent_no": 42.618199999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.151872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.006673", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve and maintain neighborhood schools by repairing and updating classrooms, science labs and technology, repairing leaky roofs, bathrooms, plumbing, and electrical, improving school safety with lighting, fences, fire alarms, and earthquake retrofits, removing asbestos, replacing portables with permanent classrooms, renovating, constructing, and equipping, modernizing school facilities, shall Lynwood Unified School District issue $93,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring strict accountability, Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee review, independent annual audits, with no funds for administrator salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11413, "fingerprint": "2012|201200386|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200386|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c40e7f260a53ee65", "measure_id": "201200386", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare students for success in high school, college and careers, repair, upgrade outdated classrooms and school buildings, upgrade classrooms, science labs and computer systems to keep pace with technology, improve student safety and security systems, and make funding available to protect and improve the quality of core academic instruction, shall the Lancaster School District issue $63,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21804, "no_votes": 9238, "total_votes": 31042, "percent_yes": 70.2403, "percent_no": 29.759699999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.020245", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.148901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.005018", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare students for success in high school, college and careers, repair, upgrade outdated classrooms and school buildings, upgrade classrooms, science labs and computer systems to keep pace with technology, improve student safety and security systems, and make funding available to protect and improve the quality of core academic instruction, shall the Lancaster School District issue $63,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5762, "fingerprint": "2012|201200024|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200024|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a9000c60d74a087b", "measure_id": "201200024", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Los Angeles County\u2019s existing tax on landfills be readopted to ratify and continue the existing 10 percent tax on landfill operators\u2019 gross receipts from waste disposal in landfills in the unincorporated county, to fund essential general fund services, such as parks, libraries, senior services, and law enforcement; and to update the administrative appeal process, and clarify definitions to ensure the tax is properly calculated?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 540260, "no_votes": 316217, "total_votes": 856477, "percent_yes": 63.0793, "percent_no": 36.9207, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.143627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.001710", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Los Angeles County\u2019s existing tax on landfills be readopted to ratify and continue the existing 10 percent tax on landfill operators\u2019 gross receipts from waste disposal in landfills in the unincorporated county, to fund essential general fund services, such as parks, libraries, senior services, and law enforcement; and to update the administrative appeal process, and clarify definitions to ensure the tax is properly calculated?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11415, "fingerprint": "2012|201200026|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200026|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6ac98da255807eea", "measure_id": "201200026", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Do you support seeking to change the California Constitution and the Los Angeles County Charter to make the position of Los Angeles County Assessor an appointed position instead of an elected position?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 598846, "no_votes": 2073761, "total_votes": 2672607, "percent_yes": 22.4068, "percent_no": 77.5932, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.021856", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.151569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.006493", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you support seeking to change the California Constitution and the Los Angeles County Charter to make the position of Los Angeles County Assessor an appointed position instead of an elected position?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11412, "fingerprint": "2012|201200155|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200155|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e707e35a4b419ea0", "measure_id": "201200155", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve our quality of life and maintain local, city services, including: neighborhood police patrols/911 response times; crime/gang prevention programs; repair potholes/keep streets from falling into disrepair; senior services/facilities; after-school programs for children/teens; and other general city services, shall the City of La Mirada enact a one cent sales tax, for 5 years, that cannot be taken by Sacramento, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual independent audits, will all funds spent only in La Mirada?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11746, "no_votes": 5883, "total_votes": 17629, "percent_yes": 66.6289, "percent_no": 33.3711, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.020050", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.148627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.004831", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve our quality of life and maintain local, city services, including: neighborhood police patrols/911 response times; crime/gang prevention programs; repair potholes/keep streets from falling into disrepair; senior services/facilities; after-school programs for children/teens; and other general city services, shall the City of La Mirada enact a one cent sales tax, for 5 years, that cannot be taken by Sacramento, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual independent audits, will all funds spent only in La Mirada?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11408, "fingerprint": "2012|201200147|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200147|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "903181e8a1ab4bcd", "measure_id": "201200147", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide the City of Artesia with additional revenue to maintain services such as neighborhood police patrols/911 response, gang prevention, pothole/street repairs with funds that require independent audits and that cannot be taken by the state, shall the Artesia Local Services Ordinance be adopted to update/increase its existing business license tax rate schedules based on type/size of business, with no rate increase for small businesses with gross annual receipts of less than $150,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2951, "no_votes": 813, "total_votes": 3764, "percent_yes": 78.4006, "percent_no": 21.599400000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.017284", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.144508", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.002264", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the City of Artesia with additional revenue to maintain services such as neighborhood police patrols/911 response, gang prevention, pothole/street repairs with funds that require independent audits and that cannot be taken by the state, shall the Artesia Local Services Ordinance be adopted to update/increase its existing business license tax rate schedules based on type/size of business, with no rate increase for small businesses with gross annual receipts of less than $150,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11407, "fingerprint": "2012|201200146|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200146|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4ce3f49519cf2836", "measure_id": "201200146", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to provide for the nomination and election of members of the Pasadena Unified School District Board of Education by\r\ngeographic sub-districts, with geographic sub-districts adopted by the School Board and redrawn after each federal census based upon a citizen Redistricting Commission\r\nrecommendation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15791, "no_votes": 13180, "total_votes": 28971, "percent_yes": 54.50620000000001, "percent_no": 45.49379999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.016892", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.143965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.001900", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to provide for the nomination and election of members of the Pasadena Unified School District Board of Education by\r\ngeographic sub-districts, with geographic sub-districts adopted by the School Board and redrawn after each federal census based upon a citizen Redistricting Commission\r\nrecommendation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11405, "fingerprint": "2012|201200140|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200140|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "07b6d7f483741627", "measure_id": "201200140", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted imposing a utility Users Tax of between 1% and 8.75% (first year being 8.4%) in order to maintain essential general city services and meet the obligations of State and Federal Mandates, establish exemptions for low or very low income households inhabited by at least one senior citizen or disabled person recieving Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and automatically terminating in five (5) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76, "no_votes": 107, "total_votes": 183, "percent_yes": 41.5301, "percent_no": 58.4699, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.015103", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.141415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.000251", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted imposing a utility Users Tax of between 1% and 8.75% (first year being 8.4%) in order to maintain essential general city services and meet the obligations of State and Federal Mandates, establish exemptions for low or very low income households inhabited by at least one senior citizen or disabled person recieving Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and automatically terminating in five (5) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5754, "fingerprint": "2012|201200377|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200377|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "07e3fabc0451f8e5", "measure_id": "201200377", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To help offset severe state budget cuts to neighborhood schools and keep Arcadia schools among the best in California by providing funds which cannot be taken away by Sacramento; to retain and attract quality teachers; keep schools safe and clean; and protect quality math, science, reading, art and music programs, shall Arcadia Unified School District levy $ 228 per parcel annually for 5 years, with senior exemptions, mandatory audits, and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6700, "no_votes": 3265, "total_votes": 9965, "percent_yes": 67.2353, "percent_no": 32.764700000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-03-13", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.140826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.999890", "update_count": 7, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help offset severe state budget cuts to neighborhood schools and keep Arcadia schools among the best in California by providing funds which cannot be taken away by Sacramento; to retain and attract quality teachers; keep schools safe and clean; and protect quality math, science, reading, art and music programs, shall Arcadia Unified School District levy $ 228 per parcel annually for 5 years, with senior exemptions, mandatory audits, and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5777, "fingerprint": "2012|201200156|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200156|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5ee08296cceb8c2d", "measure_id": "201200156", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance which establishes minimum wages and minimum sick leave payable to hotel workers, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 88587, "no_votes": 49150, "total_votes": 137737, "percent_yes": 64.31609999999999, "percent_no": 35.68390000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.150366", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.005751", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance which establishes minimum wages and minimum sick leave payable to hotel workers, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5778, "fingerprint": "2012|201200157|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200157|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "95594f4eb2f00735", "measure_id": "201200157", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure O, which amends the Long Beach City Charter to change the dates of the Primary and General Municipal Elections be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59148, "no_votes": 70295, "total_votes": 129443, "percent_yes": 45.6942, "percent_no": 54.3058, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.150668", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.005934", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure O, which amends the Long Beach City Charter to change the dates of the Primary and General Municipal Elections be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11409, "fingerprint": "2012|201200148|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200148|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8dc436db66b1e365", "measure_id": "201200148", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance to offset State financial cuts and help the City of Bellflower maintain and restore City services including: neighborhood Sheriff\u2019s patrols; local Sheriff\u2019s substation hours; drug, bullying and gang prevention/enforcement; graffiti removal; school safety/after-school programs; pothole repairs; and other services, by temporarily increasing Bellflower\u2019s utility users\u2019 tax by 2% for 5 years; with audits, low-income senior exemptions, citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds used for local purposes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11653, "no_votes": 7099, "total_votes": 18752, "percent_yes": 62.1427, "percent_no": 37.8573, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.017479", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.144846", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.002446", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance to offset State financial cuts and help the City of Bellflower maintain and restore City services including: neighborhood Sheriff\u2019s patrols; local Sheriff\u2019s substation hours; drug, bullying and gang prevention/enforcement; graffiti removal; school safety/after-school programs; pothole repairs; and other services, by temporarily increasing Bellflower\u2019s utility users\u2019 tax by 2% for 5 years; with audits, low-income senior exemptions, citizens\u2019 oversight and all funds used for local purposes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11406, "fingerprint": "2012|201200142|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200142|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d3613bcfa70b4426", "measure_id": "201200142", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending El Segundo Municipal Code to transer all function of El Sgundo Fire Department to the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (AKA the Los Angeles County Fire Department) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 317, "no_votes": 2880, "total_votes": 3197, "percent_yes": 9.9155, "percent_no": 90.0845, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.015505", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.141960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.000614", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending El Segundo Municipal Code to transer all function of El Sgundo Fire Department to the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (AKA the Los Angeles County Fire Department) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5753, "fingerprint": "2012|201200138|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200138|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "615c35d149eb049c", "measure_id": "201200138", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve revenues for vital city services, shall the City of La Verne's existing Utility User Tax ordinance be updated to reflect changes in telecommunications law and the standard rate on telecommunications be reduced by .25%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2170, "no_votes": 343, "total_votes": 2513, "percent_yes": 86.351, "percent_no": 13.649000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-03-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.140556", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:04.999714", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve revenues for vital city services, shall the City of La Verne's existing Utility User Tax ordinance be updated to reflect changes in telecommunications law and the standard rate on telecommunications be reduced by .25%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5786, "fingerprint": "2012|201200391|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200391|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c3011fe9d1243715", "measure_id": "201200391", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for success in high school, college, and the workforce; acquire, construct, upgrade, furnish, and equip school facilities, including career and technical facilities, improve classroom technology, and make energy efficiency improvements to reduce operating costs and put more money in classrooms; shall Redondo Beach Unified School District issue $63,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with no money taken by the State or used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18786, "no_votes": 10446, "total_votes": 29232, "percent_yes": 64.2652, "percent_no": 35.73480000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.154146", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.007980", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for success in high school, college, and the workforce; acquire, construct, upgrade, furnish, and equip school facilities, including career and technical facilities, improve classroom technology, and make energy efficiency improvements to reduce operating costs and put more money in classrooms; shall Redondo Beach Unified School District issue $63,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee with no money taken by the State or used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5765, "fingerprint": "2012|201200381|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200381|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b94696b267c285b2", "measure_id": "201200381", "measure_letter": "QS", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Castaic School Improvement Measure. To provide modern and efficient elementary and middle school facilities, shall Castaic Union School District build up-to-date science labs/classrooms/facilities, provide modern computers/technology/equipment, replace inefficient and outdated heating/ventilation systems and update fire alarm/safety systems by issuing $51 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5682, "no_votes": 3111, "total_votes": 8793, "percent_yes": 64.6196, "percent_no": 35.380399999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.145389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.002815", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Castaic School Improvement Measure. To provide modern and efficient elementary and middle school facilities, shall Castaic Union School District build up-to-date science labs/classrooms/facilities, provide modern computers/technology/equipment, replace inefficient and outdated heating/ventilation systems and update fire alarm/safety systems by issuing $51 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5787, "fingerprint": "2012|201200392|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200392|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0291a95f227acaa2", "measure_id": "201200392", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to upgrade Rowland Unified schools, repair, equip, construct and/or reconstruct classrooms, roofs, multiuse facilities, gyms/athletic facilities, libraries, science & technology labs, and construct permanent classrooms to replace temporary portables, shall Rowland Unified School District issue $158.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrative salaries or employee pensions, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17165, "no_votes": 8237, "total_votes": 25402, "percent_yes": 67.57339999999999, "percent_no": 32.42660000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.154507", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.008170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to upgrade Rowland Unified schools, repair, equip, construct and/or reconstruct classrooms, roofs, multiuse facilities, gyms/athletic facilities, libraries, science & technology labs, and construct permanent classrooms to replace temporary portables, shall Rowland Unified School District issue $158.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrative salaries or employee pensions, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5794, "fingerprint": "2012|201200394|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200394|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4f39c0f5a7506626", "measure_id": "201200394", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high quality education, prepare local students for college and careers, equip schools with current technology, upgrade security, fire safety, electrical, plumbing, heating/cooling systems, repair old roofs, upgrade science labs, construct, repair, acquire classrooms, vocational education facilities, sites, facilities and equipment, shall Temple City Unified School District issue $128,800,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversignt, annual audits, no money for pensions or administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds locally controlled and not be taken by Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6454, "no_votes": 3575, "total_votes": 10029, "percent_yes": 64.35340000000001, "percent_no": 35.64659999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.156668", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.009440", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high quality education, prepare local students for college and careers, equip schools with current technology, upgrade security, fire safety, electrical, plumbing, heating/cooling systems, repair old roofs, upgrade science labs, construct, repair, acquire classrooms, vocational education facilities, sites, facilities and equipment, shall Temple City Unified School District issue $128,800,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversignt, annual audits, no money for pensions or administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds locally controlled and not be taken by Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5782, "fingerprint": "2012|201200158|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200158|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e85adbd883669258", "measure_id": "201200158", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to change the method of electing the six City Council members from the current \u201cby district\u201d method, where voters from each district vote for the candidate representing each respective district pursuant to the Pomona City Charter, to an \u201cat large\u201d system where candidates representing each district are elected by voters citywide?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13350, "no_votes": 15571, "total_votes": 28921, "percent_yes": 46.1602, "percent_no": 53.8398, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.152549", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.007052", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to change the method of electing the six City Council members from the current \u201cby district\u201d method, where voters from each district vote for the candidate representing each respective district pursuant to the Pomona City Charter, to an \u201cat large\u201d system where candidates representing each district are elected by voters citywide?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5775, "fingerprint": "2012|201200388|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200388|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e9bb836cedcf198d", "measure_id": "201200388", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide up-to-date textbooks and instructional materials in English, math, science and history, to continue funding for art and music programs, to improve classroom technology, to keep schools facilities clean, safe and well-maintained and to provide locally controlled funding that the State can\u2019t take away, shall Little Lake City School District authorize a levy of $48 per parcel annually for five years with independent oversight, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and an exemption for senior citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7802, "no_votes": 2585, "total_votes": 10387, "percent_yes": 75.1131, "percent_no": 24.886899999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.149452", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.005377", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide up-to-date textbooks and instructional materials in English, math, science and history, to continue funding for art and music programs, to improve classroom technology, to keep schools facilities clean, safe and well-maintained and to provide locally controlled funding that the State can\u2019t take away, shall Little Lake City School District authorize a levy of $48 per parcel annually for five years with independent oversight, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and an exemption for senior citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5783, "fingerprint": "2012|201200159|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200159|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b3f35b25c3faf9e3", "measure_id": "201200159", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pomona be amended as proposed by the Charter Review Commission, regarding setting Council district boundaries, Mayoral election as a stand alone election, \u201cinstant runoff\u201d Councilmember elections, Council vacancy procedures, increasing contributions limits to Councilmembers, providing staff and legal counsel for Charter Commission, City budget and Capital Improvement Program appropriations, commitment to the Youth and Family Master Plan, and establising violations of the Charter as misdemeanors, among other changes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12341, "no_votes": 15633, "total_votes": 27974, "percent_yes": 44.116, "percent_no": 55.884, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.152853", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.007243", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pomona be amended as proposed by the Charter Review Commission, regarding setting Council district boundaries, Mayoral election as a stand alone election, \u201cinstant runoff\u201d Councilmember elections, Council vacancy procedures, increasing contributions limits to Councilmembers, providing staff and legal counsel for Charter Commission, City budget and Capital Improvement Program appropriations, commitment to the Youth and Family Master Plan, and establising violations of the Charter as misdemeanors, among other changes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5784, "fingerprint": "2012|201200160|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200160|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5390517704d9512d", "measure_id": "201200160", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure funding for essential general city services including police services, fire protection, street and park maintanance, business development, and park and recreation services, shall an ordinance be adopted to incresase the tax charged only to persons who occupy hotels, as defined by Pomona City Code Section 50-81, otherwise known as the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14708, "no_votes": 15225, "total_votes": 29933, "percent_yes": 49.1364, "percent_no": 50.8636, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.153144", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.007434", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure funding for essential general city services including police services, fire protection, street and park maintanance, business development, and park and recreation services, shall an ordinance be adopted to incresase the tax charged only to persons who occupy hotels, as defined by Pomona City Code Section 50-81, otherwise known as the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5785, "fingerprint": "2012|201200161|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200161|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "15a3e5946bb5fd9a", "measure_id": "201200161", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure funding for essential general city services including police services, fire protection, street and park maintenance, business development, and park and recreation services, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the tax charged when real property in the city is sold or transferred, otherwise known as the Real Property Transfer Tax, from $1.10 per $500 of property value at the time of sale $2.20?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7529, "no_votes": 22361, "total_votes": 29890, "percent_yes": 25.189, "percent_no": 74.811, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.153432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.007619", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure funding for essential general city services including police services, fire protection, street and park maintenance, business development, and park and recreation services, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the tax charged when real property in the city is sold or transferred, otherwise known as the Real Property Transfer Tax, from $1.10 per $500 of property value at the time of sale $2.20?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5795, "fingerprint": "2012|201200395|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200395|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8b2a3e1d99bc3667", "measure_id": "201200395", "measure_letter": "WP", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain academic programs including science, math, reading, writing, arts and music, fund computer technology, and help avoid increased class sizes with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Westside Union School District levy a $96.00 parcel tax for four years, so long as an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee is required, all funds are spent on neighborhood schools, and no money is used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13987, "no_votes": 11753, "total_votes": 25740, "percent_yes": 54.3395, "percent_no": 45.6605, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.156969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.009636", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain academic programs including science, math, reading, writing, arts and music, fund computer technology, and help avoid increased class sizes with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Westside Union School District levy a $96.00 parcel tax for four years, so long as an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee is required, all funds are spent on neighborhood schools, and no money is used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5796, "fingerprint": "2012|201200396|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200396|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a6e99aaeb209146b", "measure_id": "201200396", "measure_letter": "WR", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student computer/technology access; repair, equip and modernize elementary classrooms /school facilities; replace outdated heating/air conditioning; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $18,510,000 of Westside Union School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16153, "no_votes": 9696, "total_votes": 25849, "percent_yes": 62.4898, "percent_no": 37.5102, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.157261", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.009823", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student computer/technology access; repair, equip and modernize elementary classrooms /school facilities; replace outdated heating/air conditioning; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $18,510,000 of Westside Union School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11416, "fingerprint": "2012|201200162|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200162|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "44be8b62cda4cbda", "measure_id": "201200162", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide revenue dedicated to the City of Pomona Library services, and operation of the Library no fewer than 38 hours per week, shall the City of Pomona ordinance adopting a special parcel tax of $38.00/parcel and/or residential unit, providing for annual adjustments commencing July 1, 2013, be approved by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18395, "no_votes": 11947, "total_votes": 30342, "percent_yes": 60.6255, "percent_no": 39.3745, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.023248", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.153835", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.007801", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide revenue dedicated to the City of Pomona Library services, and operation of the Library no fewer than 38 hours per week, shall the City of Pomona ordinance adopting a special parcel tax of $38.00/parcel and/or residential unit, providing for annual adjustments commencing July 1, 2013, be approved by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5756, "fingerprint": "2012|201200141|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200141|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "91dbdca02d50a953", "measure_id": "201200141", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve funding of essential general city services including: public safety; street/park maintenance; senior services; job creation; business development; shall Culver City increase the existing Transient Occupancy Tax, (\"hotel room tax\"), charged only to persons who occupy hotel/motel rooms in Culver City, from 12% to 14% on July 1, 2012, with expenditures approved through general fund budgets adopted in open public hearings, subject to annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3636, "no_votes": 721, "total_votes": 4357, "percent_yes": 83.4519, "percent_no": 16.548100000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.141690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.000431", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve funding of essential general city services including: public safety; street/park maintenance; senior services; job creation; business development; shall Culver City increase the existing Transient Occupancy Tax, (\"hotel room tax\"), charged only to persons who occupy hotel/motel rooms in Culver City, from 12% to 14% on July 1, 2012, with expenditures approved through general fund budgets adopted in open public hearings, subject to annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5769, "fingerprint": "2012|201200150|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200150|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e63650adbcf31e3d", "measure_id": "201200150", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset state budget cuts, preserve quality neighborhoods and ensure effective 911 emergency response by retaining firefighters, police officers, and paramedics; fixing potholes/streets; maintaining parks, community centers, storm drains; continuing after school programs, senior services, graffiti removal, arts/cultural programs, and other general services, shall Culver City enact a half-cent sales tax, automatically expiring after ten years, requiring independent financial audits, all funds used locally, and no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14815, "no_votes": 4287, "total_votes": 19102, "percent_yes": 77.5573, "percent_no": 22.442700000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.146559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.003553", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset state budget cuts, preserve quality neighborhoods and ensure effective 911 emergency response by retaining firefighters, police officers, and paramedics; fixing potholes/streets; maintaining parks, community centers, storm drains; continuing after school programs, senior services, graffiti removal, arts/cultural programs, and other general services, shall Culver City enact a half-cent sales tax, automatically expiring after ten years, requiring independent financial audits, all funds used locally, and no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5797, "fingerprint": "2012|201200397|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200397|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2d8ba833c4b2f784", "measure_id": "201200397", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, replace deteriorating roofs; improve access to computers and technology; replace old plumbing systems; make health, safety, and handicapped accessibility improvements; replace outdated heating ventilation and cooling systems; modernize outdated classrooms and school facilities; and improve energy efficiency; shall the Whittier City Elementary School District issue $55,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries, or taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14205, "no_votes": 5424, "total_votes": 19629, "percent_yes": 72.3674, "percent_no": 27.632599999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.157553", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.010007", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, replace deteriorating roofs; improve access to computers and technology; replace old plumbing systems; make health, safety, and handicapped accessibility improvements; replace outdated heating ventilation and cooling systems; modernize outdated classrooms and school facilities; and improve energy efficiency; shall the Whittier City Elementary School District issue $55,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries, or taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11418, "fingerprint": "2012|201200399|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200399|MARIN", "content_hash": "74f7fc1ffe3e24f7", "measure_id": "201200399", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace significant cuts by the State in education funding; protect the quality of local elementary and middle schools and attract and keep highly qualified core academic teachers; shall the Mill Valley School District be authorized to implement a parcel tax of one hundred ninety-six dollars for eight years, requiring annual audit and accountability measures, and with all revenues kept local and used exclusively for Mill Valley elementary and middle schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12192, "no_votes": 4926, "total_votes": 17118, "percent_yes": 71.2233, "percent_no": 28.776700000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.026886", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.159767", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.011325", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace significant cuts by the State in education funding; protect the quality of local elementary and middle schools and attract and keep highly qualified core academic teachers; shall the Mill Valley School District be authorized to implement a parcel tax of one hundred ninety-six dollars for eight years, requiring annual audit and accountability measures, and with all revenues kept local and used exclusively for Mill Valley elementary and middle schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5798, "fingerprint": "2012|201200168|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200168|MARIN", "content_hash": "7c7614614e8951a0", "measure_id": "201200168", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue adjusting its appropriation limit for the annual fire protection and emergency medical services levy, pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, for the period 7/1/2012 through 6/30/2016? The levy for FY 2012-2013 shall not exceed the rate authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code. (The current levy is $605 per residential dwelling unit, $690 per occupancy in commercial structures, and $122 per vacant parcel.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 662, "no_votes": 183, "total_votes": 845, "percent_yes": 78.3432, "percent_no": 21.656800000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.157923", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.010195", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue adjusting its appropriation limit for the annual fire protection and emergency medical services levy, pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, for the period 7/1/2012 through 6/30/2016? The levy for FY 2012-2013 shall not exceed the rate authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code. (The current levy is $605 per residential dwelling unit, $690 per occupancy in commercial structures, and $122 per vacant parcel.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11420, "fingerprint": "2012|201200400|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200400|MARIN", "content_hash": "d75460b475dc3742", "measure_id": "201200400", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Qualified Special Tax Assessment for Educational Programs: To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical programs including, but not limited to, computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $184.70 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 2%, for no more than eight years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1617, "no_votes": 459, "total_votes": 2076, "percent_yes": 77.8902, "percent_no": 22.109800000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.027256", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.160344", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.011874", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Qualified Special Tax Assessment for Educational Programs: To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical programs including, but not limited to, computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $184.70 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 2%, for no more than eight years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5800, "fingerprint": "2012|201200169|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200169|MARIN", "content_hash": "a5fef0e0f97c15b3", "measure_id": "201200169", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the Town of Ross adopt an ordinance authorizing from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2016, the levy of a special tax for public safety services in an amount not to exceed $1000 per dwelling unit for single family residential uses and not to exceed $1000 per parcel for multi-family, commercial or other non-residential uses, and increasing the Town\u2019s appropriations limit by the amount of the special tax proceeds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 519, "no_votes": 333, "total_votes": 852, "percent_yes": 60.9155, "percent_no": 39.0845, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.158510", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.010575", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the Town of Ross adopt an ordinance authorizing from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2016, the levy of a special tax for public safety services in an amount not to exceed $1000 per dwelling unit for single family residential uses and not to exceed $1000 per parcel for multi-family, commercial or other non-residential uses, and increasing the Town\u2019s appropriations limit by the amount of the special tax proceeds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11419, "fingerprint": "2012|201200171|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200171|MARIN", "content_hash": "73b0f9ef0f63280f", "measure_id": "201200171", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the Town of Ross adopt an ordinance replacing the prior municipal services tax with a special tax for maintaining public safety services for a period of four years at a lower maximum rate of $950 per dwelling unit for single family residences and $950 per parcel for all other uses, and increasing the Town\u2019s appropriations limit by the amount of the special tax proceeds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 986, "no_votes": 349, "total_votes": 1335, "percent_yes": 73.85770000000001, "percent_no": 26.14229999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.027071", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.160058", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.011542", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the Town of Ross adopt an ordinance replacing the prior municipal services tax with a special tax for maintaining public safety services for a period of four years at a lower maximum rate of $950 per dwelling unit for single family residences and $950 per parcel for all other uses, and increasing the Town\u2019s appropriations limit by the amount of the special tax proceeds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5802, "fingerprint": "2012|201200170|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200170|MARIN", "content_hash": "714ff38c23dc423a", "measure_id": "201200170", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on November 10, 2011 and reaffirmed on February 8, 2012 by the Marin Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering the annexation of the territory of the City of Sausalito to the Southern Marin Fire Protection District, be confirmed subject to the terms and\r\nconditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1618, "no_votes": 990, "total_votes": 2608, "percent_yes": 62.0399, "percent_no": 37.9601, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.159159", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.010957", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on November 10, 2011 and reaffirmed on February 8, 2012 by the Marin Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering the annexation of the territory of the City of Sausalito to the Southern Marin Fire Protection District, be confirmed subject to the terms and\r\nconditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5799, "fingerprint": "2012|201200029|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200029|MARIN", "content_hash": "f6c89911221c6a41", "measure_id": "201200029", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Muir Beach CSD Ordinance No. 2012-1, which imposes an annual special tax of two-hundred ($200.00) dollars for a period of four (4) years, FY 2012-2013, FY 2013-2014, and FY 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, on each parcel within the Muir Beach CSD for fire protection, including fuel abatement and emergency preparedness, be approved and shall the Muir Beach CSD appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 127, "no_votes": 19, "total_votes": 146, "percent_yes": 86.9863, "percent_no": 13.0137, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.158216", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.010376", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Muir Beach CSD Ordinance No. 2012-1, which imposes an annual special tax of two-hundred ($200.00) dollars for a period of four (4) years, FY 2012-2013, FY 2013-2014, and FY 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, on each parcel within the Muir Beach CSD for fire protection, including fuel abatement and emergency preparedness, be approved and shall the Muir Beach CSD appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11417, "fingerprint": "2012|201200030|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200030|MARIN", "content_hash": "84a477911bea1eff", "measure_id": "201200030", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To preserve quality of life and maintain open space, parks, and farmland, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Marin County: Protect streams, baylands, natural areas, and wildlife habitat; Manage vegetation to preserve biodiversity and reduce wildfire risk; Repair and replace\r\ndeteriorating park facilities; and Maintain and enhance walking, hiking, biking and equestrian trails; by enacting a one-quarter cent sales tax, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, with all funds spent only in Marin County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92050, "no_votes": 32274, "total_votes": 124324, "percent_yes": 74.04039999999999, "percent_no": 25.95960000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.026701", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.159459", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.011138", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve quality of life and maintain open space, parks, and farmland, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Marin County: Protect streams, baylands, natural areas, and wildlife habitat; Manage vegetation to preserve biodiversity and reduce wildfire risk; Repair and replace\r\ndeteriorating park facilities; and Maintain and enhance walking, hiking, biking and equestrian trails; by enacting a one-quarter cent sales tax, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, with all funds spent only in Marin County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5801, "fingerprint": "2012|201200398|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200398|MARIN", "content_hash": "8c3bb7584d7c300e", "measure_id": "201200398", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide local funding the State cannot take away, preserve high quality education in reading, writing, math and science, educationally sound class sizes, school libraries, and art and music instruction, and to help attract and retain highly-qualified teachers, shall the Ross Valley School District renew its existing parcel tax for another eight years, increasing it by $149 per year, with no funds used for administrators\u2019 salaries and an exemption for seniors, and requiring annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6225, "no_votes": 2196, "total_votes": 8421, "percent_yes": 73.92229999999999, "percent_no": 26.077700000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.158871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.010768", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide local funding the State cannot take away, preserve high quality education in reading, writing, math and science, educationally sound class sizes, school libraries, and art and music instruction, and to help attract and retain highly-qualified teachers, shall the Ross Valley School District renew its existing parcel tax for another eight years, increasing it by $149 per year, with no funds used for administrators\u2019 salaries and an exemption for seniors, and requiring annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5804, "fingerprint": "2012|201200172|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200172|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201200172", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1310, "no_votes": 1490, "total_votes": 2800, "percent_yes": 46.785700000000006, "percent_no": 53.214299999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.160916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.012281", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5803, "fingerprint": "2012|201200031|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200031|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "202de9dae5a99b3a", "measure_id": "201200031", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 144 of the Brooktrails Township Community Services District, amending Ordinance Nos. 29 and 126 and increasing the Special Tax for Fire Protection and Prevention commencing with the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2012, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 575, "no_votes": 335, "total_votes": 910, "percent_yes": 63.1868, "percent_no": 36.8132, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.160627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.012092", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 144 of the Brooktrails Township Community Services District, amending Ordinance Nos. 29 and 126 and increasing the Special Tax for Fire Protection and Prevention commencing with the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2012, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5805, "fingerprint": "2012|201200032|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200032|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "e049e057a442d146", "measure_id": "201200032", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the elected representatives of Mendocino County be instructed to enact resolutions calling for amendment to the United States Constitution to establish that 1) only human beings and not corporations are endowed with constitutional rights, and 2) that money does not constitute speech and therefore political contributions can be regulated?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24492, "no_votes": 8289, "total_votes": 32781, "percent_yes": 74.714, "percent_no": 25.286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.161198", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.012492", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the elected representatives of Mendocino County be instructed to enact resolutions calling for amendment to the United States Constitution to establish that 1) only human beings and not corporations are endowed with constitutional rights, and 2) that money does not constitute speech and therefore political contributions can be regulated?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5806, "fingerprint": "2012|201200033|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200033|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "a9d1c00d450be481", "measure_id": "201200033", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the Mendocino County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten year term for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26371, "no_votes": 6871, "total_votes": 33242, "percent_yes": 79.3304, "percent_no": 20.669600000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.161489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.012700", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Mendocino County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees (one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles) be renewed for a ten year term for purposes of removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5807, "fingerprint": "2012|201200401|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200401|MERCED", "content_hash": "762a997d2944e85b", "measure_id": "201200401", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Sheila Whitney be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125, "no_votes": 23, "total_votes": 148, "percent_yes": 84.45949999999999, "percent_no": 15.540500000000009, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-10-16", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.161783", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.012883", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sheila Whitney be recalled (removed) from the office of school board member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5808, "fingerprint": "2012|201200402|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200402|MERCED", "content_hash": "ad5a2746930e1c2a", "measure_id": "201200402", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize, construct and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; make health and safety improvements; improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; make required handicapped accessibility improvements; and improve energy efficiency; shall the Delhi Unified School District issue $8,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1435, "no_votes": 578, "total_votes": 2013, "percent_yes": 71.28659999999999, "percent_no": 28.713400000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.162076", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.013074", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize, construct and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; make health and safety improvements; improve P.E. fields and facilities for school and community use; make required handicapped accessibility improvements; and improve energy efficiency; shall the Delhi Unified School District issue $8,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5809, "fingerprint": "2012|201200403|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200403|MERCED", "content_hash": "eb12a4e0a5a7a40a", "measure_id": "201200403", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and suppo1rt facilities, reduce student overcrowding, match State grants to modernize Weaver Middle School and construct a new elementary, increase access to computers and modern classroom technology, replace portable classrooms with permanent facilities, reduce annual operating costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Weaver Union School District be authorized to issue up to $9,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits and independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1422, "no_votes": 1112, "total_votes": 2534, "percent_yes": 56.1168, "percent_no": 43.8832, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.162436", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.013276", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and suppo1rt facilities, reduce student overcrowding, match State grants to modernize Weaver Middle School and construct a new elementary, increase access to computers and modern classroom technology, replace portable classrooms with permanent facilities, reduce annual operating costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Weaver Union School District be authorized to issue up to $9,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits and independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5810, "fingerprint": "2012|201200174|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200174|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f8ce2e89b70577c6", "measure_id": "201200174", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall John Huerta Jr. be recalled from the office of Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 716, "no_votes": 785, "total_votes": 1501, "percent_yes": 47.7015, "percent_no": 52.2985, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.162789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.013536", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall John Huerta Jr. be recalled from the office of Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5811, "fingerprint": "2012|201200175|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200175|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "06fa3b44a9ef7e2c", "measure_id": "201200175", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Yolanda Teneyuque be recalled from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1090, "no_votes": 398, "total_votes": 1488, "percent_yes": 73.2527, "percent_no": 26.747299999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.163074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.013752", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Yolanda Teneyuque be recalled from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5812, "fingerprint": "2012|201200176|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200176|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d7a99319f882e444", "measure_id": "201200176", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall John Martinez be recalled from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 973, "no_votes": 504, "total_votes": 1477, "percent_yes": 65.8768, "percent_no": 34.1232, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.163372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.013932", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall John Martinez be recalled from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5821, "fingerprint": "2012|201200407|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200407|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "64c414b56065b332", "measure_id": "201200407", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Spreckels Union School District Student Achievement and School Safety Measure. To improve educational quality/student achievement/safety in every local school, retain teachers, reduce the impact of state budget cuts, qualify for matching grants by upgrading technology to improve teaching/student learning, repairing/upgrading fire alarms, 9-1-1 systems, roofs, ventilation, classrooms/computer labs. Shall Spreckels Union School District issue $7 million in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2091, "no_votes": 1255, "total_votes": 3346, "percent_yes": 62.49249999999999, "percent_no": 37.50750000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.166306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.015618", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Spreckels Union School District Student Achievement and School Safety Measure. To improve educational quality/student achievement/safety in every local school, retain teachers, reduce the impact of state budget cuts, qualify for matching grants by upgrading technology to improve teaching/student learning, repairing/upgrading fire alarms, 9-1-1 systems, roofs, ventilation, classrooms/computer labs. Shall Spreckels Union School District issue $7 million in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5820, "fingerprint": "2012|201200406|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200406|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "11215cef4a71a94d", "measure_id": "201200406", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classroom computer technology; expand vocational education facilities; build a new middle school; renovate classrooms and facilities at Ferrero, Franscioni, Gabilan, Ledesma, and San Vicente Elementary, Main Street Middle, Chalone, Pinnacles, and Soledad High Schools and Soledad Adult School; shall Soledad Unified School District issue $40 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2332, "no_votes": 799, "total_votes": 3131, "percent_yes": 74.481, "percent_no": 25.519000000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.165928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.015437", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classroom computer technology; expand vocational education facilities; build a new middle school; renovate classrooms and facilities at Ferrero, Franscioni, Gabilan, Ledesma, and San Vicente Elementary, Main Street Middle, Chalone, Pinnacles, and Soledad High Schools and Soledad Adult School; shall Soledad Unified School District issue $40 million of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5815, "fingerprint": "2012|201200178|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200178|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "e2acc6c4b9bcf46a", "measure_id": "201200178", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Carmel-by-the-Sea increase transaction and use tax (sales tax) by 1% for 10 years, with an annual independent audit, to maintain essential services including fire, ambulance and police response times; fund capital needs including streets, beach, parks, forest and trails; increase code compliance; maintain libraries, Sunset Center and other public facilities; address CalPERS pension liabilities and other debt; and provide other general City services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1710, "no_votes": 558, "total_votes": 2268, "percent_yes": 75.3968, "percent_no": 24.6032, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.164264", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.014488", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Carmel-by-the-Sea increase transaction and use tax (sales tax) by 1% for 10 years, with an annual independent audit, to maintain essential services including fire, ambulance and police response times; fund capital needs including streets, beach, parks, forest and trails; increase code compliance; maintain libraries, Sunset Center and other public facilities; address CalPERS pension liabilities and other debt; and provide other general City services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5819, "fingerprint": "2012|201200180|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200180|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "e6262b1ec66cccb0", "measure_id": "201200180", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Crime Prevention, Safety, Library and Essential Services. To preserve essential services and facilities in Salinas, including: crime and gang prevention; keeping libraries open; emergency response, police, fire, paramedics; fixing streets and sidewalks; parks and recreation for youth and seniors; and other city services; shall the City of Salinas renew its existing sales tax (Measure V) to provide ongoing local funds to be used only in Salinas, protected from State takeaways, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25708, "no_votes": 7422, "total_votes": 33130, "percent_yes": 77.5973, "percent_no": 22.402699999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.165557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.015251", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Crime Prevention, Safety, Library and Essential Services. To preserve essential services and facilities in Salinas, including: crime and gang prevention; keeping libraries open; emergency response, police, fire, paramedics; fixing streets and sidewalks; parks and recreation for youth and seniors; and other city services; shall the City of Salinas renew its existing sales tax (Measure V) to provide ongoing local funds to be used only in Salinas, protected from State takeaways, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5816, "fingerprint": "2012|201200179|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200179|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "3615df5d8bcf47b5", "measure_id": "201200179", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to amend Pacific Grove Municipal Code Chapter 23.33, the C-1-T District (the Holman Block bounded by Lighthouse Avenue, Grand Avenue, Central Avenue and Fountain Avenue), to allow buildings with a maximum height of 75 feet and 100 percent site coverage, provided upper stories step back along Central Avenue to create a pedestrian scale at the sidewalk and maintain compatibility with the character of downtown Pacific Grove, and further provided this amendment shall apply only to a project application submitted to the City on or before December 31, 2017", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3204, "no_votes": 4485, "total_votes": 7689, "percent_yes": 41.6699, "percent_no": 58.3301, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.164646", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.014686", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to amend Pacific Grove Municipal Code Chapter 23.33, the C-1-T District (the Holman Block bounded by Lighthouse Avenue, Grand Avenue, Central Avenue and Fountain Avenue), to allow buildings with a maximum height of 75 feet and 100 percent site coverage, provided upper stories step back along Central Avenue to create a pedestrian scale at the sidewalk and maintain compatibility with the character of downtown Pacific Grove, and further provided this amendment shall apply only to a project application submitted to the City on or before December 31, 2017", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5818, "fingerprint": "2012|201200405|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200405|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "89d5bce00686e2ce", "measure_id": "201200405", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging schools, which support quality education in the Aptos and Watsonville areas, with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Pajaro Valley Unified School District upgrade classrooms in all schools, repair leaking roofs and aging schools, upgrade computers and instructional technology in all schools, and construct, repair and acquire classrooms, sites and equipment, by issuing $150,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, independent audits, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1474, "no_votes": 669, "total_votes": 2143, "percent_yes": 68.7821, "percent_no": 31.2179, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.165260", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.015063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging schools, which support quality education in the Aptos and Watsonville areas, with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Pajaro Valley Unified School District upgrade classrooms in all schools, repair leaking roofs and aging schools, upgrade computers and instructional technology in all schools, and construct, repair and acquire classrooms, sites and equipment, by issuing $150,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, independent audits, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5817, "fingerprint": "2012|201200404|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200404|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "606e78cdd492b285", "measure_id": "201200404", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To aid in preserving educational quality in our schools in the face of Statewide budget cuts, including but not limited to science, math, music, art, computers and libraries; maintain small class sizes; and retain teachers; shall Pacific Grove Unified School District levy $65 per parcel for five years to replace and extend the previously approved tax with independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6102, "no_votes": 3092, "total_votes": 9194, "percent_yes": 66.3694, "percent_no": 33.6306, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.164959", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.014872", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To aid in preserving educational quality in our schools in the face of Statewide budget cuts, including but not limited to science, math, music, art, computers and libraries; maintain small class sizes; and retain teachers; shall Pacific Grove Unified School District levy $65 per parcel for five years to replace and extend the previously approved tax with independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5813, "fingerprint": "2012|201200173|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200173|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "3d6707febaf57da5", "measure_id": "201200173", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent potential reduction of services to the Police Department, restore Police staffing and services; maintain the financial viability of the City; ensure adequate park maintenance, restore City Hall service hours and return Recreation Programs for youth; shall the City of Greenfield enact a one cent sales tax, which will sunset in 5 years, and be subject to review by an Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and public expenditure reports?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 951, "no_votes": 507, "total_votes": 1458, "percent_yes": 65.22630000000001, "percent_no": 34.77369999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.163673", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.014109", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent potential reduction of services to the Police Department, restore Police staffing and services; maintain the financial viability of the City; ensure adequate park maintenance, restore City Hall service hours and return Recreation Programs for youth; shall the City of Greenfield enact a one cent sales tax, which will sunset in 5 years, and be subject to review by an Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and public expenditure reports?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5814, "fingerprint": "2012|201200177|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200177|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "25ffb445aaad563a", "measure_id": "201200177", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect and maintain local services, such as neighborhood police patrols, investigation and gang suppression officers, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response times, streets and parks maintenance, recreation programs and other general City services, shall the City of Soledad enact a one percent (1%) sales tax, for five (5) years, reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, annual independent audits, and all funds for Soledad and no funds for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 771, "no_votes": 326, "total_votes": 1097, "percent_yes": 70.2826, "percent_no": 29.717399999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.163977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.014287", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect and maintain local services, such as neighborhood police patrols, investigation and gang suppression officers, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response times, streets and parks maintenance, recreation programs and other general City services, shall the City of Soledad enact a one percent (1%) sales tax, for five (5) years, reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, annual independent audits, and all funds for Soledad and no funds for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5823, "fingerprint": "2012|201200182|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200182|NAPA", "content_hash": "3357730008692ad5", "measure_id": "201200182", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 681 approved by the City Council be adopted to establish certain planned development regulations for the property located on and near 400 Silverado Trail, Calistoga which will allow the development of the Silver Rose resort and residential project?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1079, "no_votes": 781, "total_votes": 1860, "percent_yes": 58.0108, "percent_no": 41.9892, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.166855", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.015988", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 681 approved by the City Council be adopted to establish certain planned development regulations for the property located on and near 400 Silverado Trail, Calistoga which will allow the development of the Silver Rose resort and residential project?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5828, "fingerprint": "2012|201200408|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200408|NAPA", "content_hash": "bd10bc44940768ef", "measure_id": "201200408", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student achievement, college/career readiness, and student safety by upgrading classrooms and instructional technology for improved teaching/learning in technology, science, math and other core subjects; replacing/constructing/improving school facilities, including the high school auditorium, and safer playing fields; and improving energy efficiency/conservation, generating savings to support instruction, shall St. Helena Unified School District issue bonds not to exceed $30 million, at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2782, "no_votes": 1887, "total_votes": 4669, "percent_yes": 59.5845, "percent_no": 40.4155, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.168322", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.016897", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student achievement, college/career readiness, and student safety by upgrading classrooms and instructional technology for improved teaching/learning in technology, science, math and other core subjects; replacing/constructing/improving school facilities, including the high school auditorium, and safer playing fields; and improving energy efficiency/conservation, generating savings to support instruction, shall St. Helena Unified School District issue bonds not to exceed $30 million, at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5822, "fingerprint": "2012|201200181|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200181|NAPA", "content_hash": "d565f02c8be0007e", "measure_id": "201200181", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of American Canyon approve an ordinance authorizing an increase in the term of the mayor's office from two (2) years to four (4) years, to be effective immediately for the elected mayor? (If this portion of the Measure fails , the elected mayor shall serve for a term of two (2) years as provided by Municipal Code section 2.02.030.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3378, "no_votes": 2961, "total_votes": 6339, "percent_yes": 53.2892, "percent_no": 46.7108, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.166580", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.015806", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of American Canyon approve an ordinance authorizing an increase in the term of the mayor's office from two (2) years to four (4) years, to be effective immediately for the elected mayor? (If this portion of the Measure fails , the elected mayor shall serve for a term of two (2) years as provided by Municipal Code section 2.02.030.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5824, "fingerprint": "2012|201200034|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200034|NAPA", "content_hash": "7883778a261a0387", "measure_id": "201200034", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance 2012-01 be adopted? (This Ordinance, if approved by the voters , amends the Napa County Code to change the existing requirement that Napa County Airport Runway 18 Right-36 Left be designed and constructed to a maximum dual-wheel load-bearing strength of fifty thousand (50,000) pounds and instead require that Napa County Airport Runway 18 Right-36 Left be designed and constructed in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration standards whenever repair/replacement of the runway is needed).", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39333, "no_votes": 11329, "total_votes": 50662, "percent_yes": 77.6381, "percent_no": 22.361900000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.167125", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.016167", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance 2012-01 be adopted? (This Ordinance, if approved by the voters , amends the Napa County Code to change the existing requirement that Napa County Airport Runway 18 Right-36 Left be designed and constructed to a maximum dual-wheel load-bearing strength of fifty thousand (50,000) pounds and instead require that Napa County Airport Runway 18 Right-36 Left be designed and constructed in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration standards whenever repair/replacement of the runway is needed).", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5825, "fingerprint": "2012|201200035|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200035|NAPA", "content_hash": "dcc4d339db695deb", "measure_id": "201200035", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2012-01 be adopted? (If adopted, revenues will be used exclusively to fix potholes, repair, maintain and improve local streets, roads and sidewalks in Napa, American Canyon , SI. Helena, Calistoga, Yountville, and unincorporated areas within Napa County, by extending an expiring one-half percent sales tax for 25 years, resulting in no new increase in existing local sales tax rates. All revenues will be subject to strict, local citizen oversight and annual independent audits).", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39462, "no_votes": 13313, "total_votes": 52775, "percent_yes": 74.774, "percent_no": 25.226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.167390", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.016347", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2012-01 be adopted? (If adopted, revenues will be used exclusively to fix potholes, repair, maintain and improve local streets, roads and sidewalks in Napa, American Canyon , SI. Helena, Calistoga, Yountville, and unincorporated areas within Napa County, by extending an expiring one-half percent sales tax for 25 years, resulting in no new increase in existing local sales tax rates. All revenues will be subject to strict, local citizen oversight and annual independent audits).", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5826, "fingerprint": "2012|201200036|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200036|NAPA", "content_hash": "a2551098386c4846", "measure_id": "201200036", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Angwin General Plan Amendment Initiative be adopted? (The Initiative, if approved by the voters, would redesignate certain lands in Angwin from Urban Residential to Agricultural, Watershed and Open Space (AWOS) or Public Institutional, permit modernization and expansion of an existing sewage treatment facility west of Howell Mountain Road despite its AWOS designation, and prohibit further subdivision of Public Institutional Lands countywide).", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20101, "no_votes": 30761, "total_votes": 50862, "percent_yes": 39.5207, "percent_no": 60.4793, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.167763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.016534", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Angwin General Plan Amendment Initiative be adopted? (The Initiative, if approved by the voters, would redesignate certain lands in Angwin from Urban Residential to Agricultural, Watershed and Open Space (AWOS) or Public Institutional, permit modernization and expansion of an existing sewage treatment facility west of Howell Mountain Road despite its AWOS designation, and prohibit further subdivision of Public Institutional Lands countywide).", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5827, "fingerprint": "2012|201200037|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200037|NAPA", "content_hash": "2208396ae2097c49", "measure_id": "201200037", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 2012-086 and Ordinance No. 2012-02 be adopted? (The Resolution and Ordinance, if approved by the voters, would permit the existing restaurant and banquet facilities at the existing Chardonnay golf course to be open to the general public as well as to golf patrons, club members, and their guests).", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45449, "no_votes": 6524, "total_votes": 51973, "percent_yes": 87.4473, "percent_no": 12.552700000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.168037", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.016713", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 2012-086 and Ordinance No. 2012-02 be adopted? (The Resolution and Ordinance, if approved by the voters, would permit the existing restaurant and banquet facilities at the existing Chardonnay golf course to be open to the general public as well as to golf patrons, club members, and their guests).", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5829, "fingerprint": "2012|201200038|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200038|NEVADA", "content_hash": "04f3f6a369b2603a", "measure_id": "201200038", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2012-01 of the Mystic Mine Community Services District be adopted to:(i) increase the existing road tax from $120 to $200 per parcel per year to pay for road maintenance and improvements, (ii) make other changes to the tax as stated in the Ordinance and (iii) establish a spending limit of $30,000 in accordance with Article XIIIB of the California Constitution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41, "no_votes": 28, "total_votes": 69, "percent_yes": 59.420300000000005, "percent_no": 40.579699999999995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.168680", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.017090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2012-01 of the Mystic Mine Community Services District be adopted to:(i) increase the existing road tax from $120 to $200 per parcel per year to pay for road maintenance and improvements, (ii) make other changes to the tax as stated in the Ordinance and (iii) establish a spending limit of $30,000 in accordance with Article XIIIB of the California Constitution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5833, "fingerprint": "2012|201200409|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200409|NEVADA", "content_hash": "baded536417d068e", "measure_id": "201200409", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Pleasant Ridge Union School District be authorized to levy a temporary special tax for a period of five years at an annual rate of $92.00 per parcel to fund essential school programs and services including, Gifted and Talendted Educational Programs, Visual and Performing Arts, Counseling and Nursing Services, Libraries, Technology, Equipment and Curriculum, Academic Programs, Student Athletics, Auxillary/Extracurricular Academic Programs, Physical Education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4131, "no_votes": 6718, "total_votes": 10849, "percent_yes": 38.0772, "percent_no": 61.9228, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.170096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.017853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pleasant Ridge Union School District be authorized to levy a temporary special tax for a period of five years at an annual rate of $92.00 per parcel to fund essential school programs and services including, Gifted and Talendted Educational Programs, Visual and Performing Arts, Counseling and Nursing Services, Libraries, Technology, Equipment and Curriculum, Academic Programs, Student Athletics, Auxillary/Extracurricular Academic Programs, Physical Education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5832, "fingerprint": "2012|201200185|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200185|NEVADA", "content_hash": "68ff8bd502325f99", "measure_id": "201200185", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the safety, public services and quality of life in Nevada City, shall a three-eights cent per one dollar retail transactions and use tax (sales tax) be temporarily imposed and collected within the City of Nevada City for a period of five (5) years to be used for general municipal purposes, including funding for essential eservices such as police, fire, parks and trails, and general community services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1285, "no_votes": 431, "total_votes": 1716, "percent_yes": 74.8834, "percent_no": 25.116600000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.169715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.017667", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the safety, public services and quality of life in Nevada City, shall a three-eights cent per one dollar retail transactions and use tax (sales tax) be temporarily imposed and collected within the City of Nevada City for a period of five (5) years to be used for general municipal purposes, including funding for essential eservices such as police, fire, parks and trails, and general community services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5830, "fingerprint": "2012|201200183|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200183|NEVADA", "content_hash": "5e42b49c04eea237", "measure_id": "201200183", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Grass Valley Charter of 2012 be adopted to update the City's 1953 Charter to remove outdated language and to reflect changes in the City and in the law that applies the City since 1953?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3631, "no_votes": 920, "total_votes": 4551, "percent_yes": 79.7847, "percent_no": 20.2153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.168964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.017269", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Grass Valley Charter of 2012 be adopted to update the City's 1953 Charter to remove outdated language and to reflect changes in the City and in the law that applies the City since 1953?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5831, "fingerprint": "2012|201200184|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200184|NEVADA", "content_hash": "dbd4a5be64c3cd19", "measure_id": "201200184", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For such general fund purposes as restoring police and fire staffing, replacing police and fire equipment, and repairing City streets, shall a half-cent ($0.005) transactions and use tax (\"sales tax\") be adopted, requiring yearly review by an independent auditor and by a Citizens Oversight Committee, provided the tax must end in 10 years and may end sooner if other City sales taxes return to 2007 levels before then?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3155, "no_votes": 1593, "total_votes": 4748, "percent_yes": 66.449, "percent_no": 33.551, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.169313", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.017477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For such general fund purposes as restoring police and fire staffing, replacing police and fire equipment, and repairing City streets, shall a half-cent ($0.005) transactions and use tax (\"sales tax\") be adopted, requiring yearly review by an independent auditor and by a Citizens Oversight Committee, provided the tax must end in 10 years and may end sooner if other City sales taxes return to 2007 levels before then?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5836, "fingerprint": "2012|201200187|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200187|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d576d2b86b4d0459", "measure_id": "201200187", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall F. Richard \"Dick\" Jones be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13192, "no_votes": 6911, "total_votes": 20103, "percent_yes": 65.622, "percent_no": 34.378, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.171230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.018412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall F. Richard \"Dick\" Jones be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5837, "fingerprint": "2012|201200188|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200188|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2d33e9adb23721b7", "measure_id": "201200188", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Pat McKinley be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13151, "no_votes": 6857, "total_votes": 20008, "percent_yes": 65.72869999999999, "percent_no": 34.27130000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.171904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.018594", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Pat McKinley be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5838, "fingerprint": "2012|201200189|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200189|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ac8f56c067d2511f", "measure_id": "201200189", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Don Bankhead be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13132, "no_votes": 6880, "total_votes": 20012, "percent_yes": 65.6206, "percent_no": 34.379400000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.172182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.018772", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Don Bankhead be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5852, "fingerprint": "2012|201200200|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200200|ORANGE", "content_hash": "560df1cd5e0d0449", "measure_id": "201200200", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing taxes or rates, shall Ordinance No. 3953, which provides that the City's existing taxes, assessments and property related fees apply to Sunset Beach, recently annexed to the City, so those measures apply equally to all residents, property owners, transients, business owners and visitors in the City to fund City services such as police, fire, street repair, parks and libraries, provided that existing exemptions for low-income seniors and disabled residents continue, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65307, "no_votes": 12395, "total_votes": 77702, "percent_yes": 84.048, "percent_no": 15.951999999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.176919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.021678", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing taxes or rates, shall Ordinance No. 3953, which provides that the City's existing taxes, assessments and property related fees apply to Sunset Beach, recently annexed to the City, so those measures apply equally to all residents, property owners, transients, business owners and visitors in the City to fund City services such as police, fire, street repair, parks and libraries, provided that existing exemptions for low-income seniors and disabled residents continue, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5839, "fingerprint": "2012|201200039|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200039|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a5404457f28e3668", "measure_id": "201200039", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the County Charter to require that members of the Orange County Board of Supervisors enroll in the minimum pension plan option offered to County employees be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 273160, "no_votes": 104257, "total_votes": 377417, "percent_yes": 72.3762, "percent_no": 27.623800000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.172530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.018949", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the County Charter to require that members of the Orange County Board of Supervisors enroll in the minimum pension plan option offered to County employees be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5854, "fingerprint": "2012|201200202|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200202|ORANGE", "content_hash": "795de960f732e60c", "measure_id": "201200202", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to direct the City of Irvine to provide financial support to Irvine schools, through the Irvine Educational Partnership Fund and the Challenge Match\r\nGrant programs, on the terms and conditions specified in the ordinance, for three fiscal years commencing with Fiscal Year 2013-2014?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49619, "no_votes": 21278, "total_votes": 70897, "percent_yes": 69.9874, "percent_no": 30.012600000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.177702", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.022037", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to direct the City of Irvine to provide financial support to Irvine schools, through the Irvine Educational Partnership Fund and the Challenge Match\r\nGrant programs, on the terms and conditions specified in the ordinance, for three fiscal years commencing with Fiscal Year 2013-2014?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5856, "fingerprint": "2012|201200203|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200203|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f930f4da9360ab98", "measure_id": "201200203", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a parcel tax of $120 per year on each parcel of property in the City, unless exempted, for a twenty-year period for the acquisition of land for the permanent preservation of open space with the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5836, "no_votes": 7185, "total_votes": 13021, "percent_yes": 44.8199, "percent_no": 55.1801, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.178292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.022403", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a parcel tax of $120 per year on each parcel of property in the City, unless exempted, for a twenty-year period for the acquisition of land for the permanent preservation of open space with the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5857, "fingerprint": "2012|201200204|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200204|ORANGE", "content_hash": "532052b2bccae9f5", "measure_id": "201200204", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the rate of the City's tax on telecommunications users from 6% to 5%, modernize the language to treat taxpayers equally, regardless of technology used, and continue to use the proceeds to fund general municipal services, such as safety, parks and recreation, and street maintenance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3076, "no_votes": 1276, "total_votes": 4352, "percent_yes": 70.6801, "percent_no": 29.319900000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.178566", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.022583", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the rate of the City's tax on telecommunications users from 6% to 5%, modernize the language to treat taxpayers equally, regardless of technology used, and continue to use the proceeds to fund general municipal services, such as safety, parks and recreation, and street maintenance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5834, "fingerprint": "2012|201200410|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200410|ORANGE", "content_hash": "568288df96309017", "measure_id": "201200410", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct and modernize classrooms/school facilities, including career and technical facilities to better prepare students for college and the workforce, increase access to modern classroom technology, improve student safety, and make energy efficiency improvements to reduce operating costs and put more money into the classroom, shall the Brea Olinda Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $54,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3254, "no_votes": 3467, "total_votes": 6721, "percent_yes": 48.4154, "percent_no": 51.5846, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.170503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.018037", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct and modernize classrooms/school facilities, including career and technical facilities to better prepare students for college and the workforce, increase access to modern classroom technology, improve student safety, and make energy efficiency improvements to reduce operating costs and put more money into the classroom, shall the Brea Olinda Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $54,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5858, "fingerprint": "2012|201200205|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200205|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b9390f0009172498", "measure_id": "201200205", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to: prohibit red light cameras; expand conflicts of interest protections; make revisions to Council regulations, powers, and procedures; uniformly set officer compensation; allow offsite administrative offices; adjust officers\u2019 powers and duties; adjust board/commission duties, regulations, and formation; refine financial reporting requirements; consolidate and maintain Council compensation at current levels; delete outdated sections; clarify existing sections; prohibit class action claims; remove duplicative language; and align sections with State law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23046, "no_votes": 17532, "total_votes": 40578, "percent_yes": 56.7943, "percent_no": 43.2057, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.178867", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.022761", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to: prohibit red light cameras; expand conflicts of interest protections; make revisions to Council regulations, powers, and procedures; uniformly set officer compensation; allow offsite administrative offices; adjust officers\u2019 powers and duties; adjust board/commission duties, regulations, and formation; refine financial reporting requirements; consolidate and maintain Council compensation at current levels; delete outdated sections; clarify existing sections; prohibit class action claims; remove duplicative language; and align sections with State law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5860, "fingerprint": "2012|201200206|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200206|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3dc6bf62acdde6cb", "measure_id": "201200206", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 10566, which included textual amendments to the Orange Park Acres Plan and affirmed the general plan land use designation of Other Open Space and Low Density (1 acre) in connection with the proposed Ridgeline Equestrian Estates project, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19809, "no_votes": 25655, "total_votes": 45464, "percent_yes": 43.5707, "percent_no": 56.4293, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.179535", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.023153", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 10566, which included textual amendments to the Orange Park Acres Plan and affirmed the general plan land use designation of Other Open Space and Low Density (1 acre) in connection with the proposed Ridgeline Equestrian Estates project, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5841, "fingerprint": "2012|201200411|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200411|ORANGE", "content_hash": "cbb752fa51d26d7e", "measure_id": "201200411", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect the quality of education and provide safe, modern school facilities, shall Savanna Elementary School District complete repairs, renovations to outdated classrooms and facilities, upgrade classrooms and computer systems to keep pace with technology, improve student safety, fire and security systems, and support and protect high-quality academic instruction in math, science, reading and writing, by issuing 28.75 million dollars in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1715, "no_votes": 1173, "total_votes": 2888, "percent_yes": 59.3837, "percent_no": 40.6163, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.173088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.019308", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of education and provide safe, modern school facilities, shall Savanna Elementary School District complete repairs, renovations to outdated classrooms and facilities, upgrade classrooms and computer systems to keep pace with technology, improve student safety, fire and security systems, and support and protect high-quality academic instruction in math, science, reading and writing, by issuing 28.75 million dollars in bonds at legal interest rates, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5863, "fingerprint": "2012|201200207|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200207|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fa2e4425ed6831dd", "measure_id": "201200207", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Santa Ana be amended to establish and impose upon the office of Mayor term limits of no more than four (4) two-year terms, commencing with the term beginning December 11, 2012?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42957, "no_votes": 12642, "total_votes": 55599, "percent_yes": 77.2622, "percent_no": 22.737799999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.180358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.023696", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Santa Ana be amended to establish and impose upon the office of Mayor term limits of no more than four (4) two-year terms, commencing with the term beginning December 11, 2012?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5844, "fingerprint": "2012|201200192|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200192|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2783c9037200fac6", "measure_id": "201200192", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ordinances be adopted amending the Yorba Linda General Plan and zoning requirements to allow the development of additional housing units and increased building heights within the Office Commercial and Support Commercial sub-areas of the Savi Ranch Planned Development zone in the City in furtherance of meeting state mandated affordable housing laws?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8477, "no_votes": 5474, "total_votes": 13951, "percent_yes": 60.7627, "percent_no": 39.2373, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.173910", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.019872", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ordinances be adopted amending the Yorba Linda General Plan and zoning requirements to allow the development of additional housing units and increased building heights within the Office Commercial and Support Commercial sub-areas of the Savi Ranch Planned Development zone in the City in furtherance of meeting state mandated affordable housing laws?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5864, "fingerprint": "2012|201200208|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200208|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fdfa3a34f4823b1b", "measure_id": "201200208", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted repealing Tustin City Code sections 1303 and 1308(a)-(d), to eliminate City Council member monthly salary and City Council compensation consisting of participation in the City medical, dental insurance, life insurance programs, and retirement benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14086, "no_votes": 6531, "total_votes": 20617, "percent_yes": 68.3223, "percent_no": 31.6777, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.180642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.023874", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted repealing Tustin City Code sections 1303 and 1308(a)-(d), to eliminate City Council member monthly salary and City Council compensation consisting of participation in the City medical, dental insurance, life insurance programs, and retirement benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5842, "fingerprint": "2012|201200191|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200191|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6a932258c4dab083", "measure_id": "201200191", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing utility user tax, approved by the voters in 2001 at the rate of 5%, be increased to the rate of 7.5%, applied to all utility services, with an annual adjustment for\r\ninflation according to the Consumer Price Index, for the funding of general city services and programs, provided that existing exemptions from the tax remain?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1463, "no_votes": 1800, "total_votes": 3263, "percent_yes": 44.836, "percent_no": 55.164, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.173358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.019497", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing utility user tax, approved by the voters in 2001 at the rate of 5%, be increased to the rate of 7.5%, applied to all utility services, with an annual adjustment for\r\ninflation according to the Consumer Price Index, for the funding of general city services and programs, provided that existing exemptions from the tax remain?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5843, "fingerprint": "2012|201200190|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200190|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0e8da071121e8083", "measure_id": "201200190", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City Council give priority to the following vital City programs and services in allocating money available in the City\u2019s general fund: providing for public safety by continuing and preserving police, fire and paramedic services; retain Stanton\u2019s support for school programs; restoring adequate reserves and funding economic growth and jobs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2351, "no_votes": 904, "total_votes": 3255, "percent_yes": 72.2273, "percent_no": 27.7727, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.173633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.019678", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City Council give priority to the following vital City programs and services in allocating money available in the City\u2019s general fund: providing for public safety by continuing and preserving police, fire and paramedic services; retain Stanton\u2019s support for school programs; restoring adequate reserves and funding economic growth and jobs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5835, "fingerprint": "2012|201200186|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200186|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8a2bc7c95bbdc911", "measure_id": "201200186", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance approving the amendment to the Cypress Business & Professional Center Specific Plan to allow additional uses, including market-rate senior citizen housing, assisted living facilities, professional offices, including medical services, and mixed-use commercial, in\r\na planning area adjacent to Katella Avenue with related General Plan amendments and a zone change be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5071, "no_votes": 2167, "total_votes": 7238, "percent_yes": 70.0608, "percent_no": 29.9392, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.170847", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.018228", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance approving the amendment to the Cypress Business & Professional Center Specific Plan to allow additional uses, including market-rate senior citizen housing, assisted living facilities, professional offices, including medical services, and mixed-use commercial, in\r\na planning area adjacent to Katella Avenue with related General Plan amendments and a zone change be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11422, "fingerprint": "2012|201200412|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200412|ORANGE", "content_hash": "380a5996ac9408fe", "measure_id": "201200412", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To address severe State cuts, prepare students/returning veterans for universities/jobs by expanding classrooms and courses in science, technology, engineering/ math, improving active military/veterans educational resources, repairing decaying walls, fire/drainage systems, leaking roofs, removing asbestos, upgrading technology, acquiring, constructing, repairing facilities, sites, equipment, shall Coast Community College District issue $698,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with financial safeguards/audits, NO money\r\nfor administrators' salaries/pensions, prohibiting Sacramento from taking these local funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134619, "no_votes": 100843, "total_votes": 235462, "percent_yes": 57.1723, "percent_no": 42.8277, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.035917", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.175169", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.020592", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address severe State cuts, prepare students/returning veterans for universities/jobs by expanding classrooms and courses in science, technology, engineering/ math, improving active military/veterans educational resources, repairing decaying walls, fire/drainage systems, leaking roofs, removing asbestos, upgrading technology, acquiring, constructing, repairing facilities, sites, equipment, shall Coast Community College District issue $698,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with financial safeguards/audits, NO money\r\nfor administrators' salaries/pensions, prohibiting Sacramento from taking these local funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11421, "fingerprint": "2012|201200193|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200193|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ede2078c742f2709", "measure_id": "201200193", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ordinances be adopted amending the General Plan, Town Center Specific Plan, and zoning requirements to allow additional housing units at specific locations, some with increased building heights, in furtherance of meeting state mandated affordable housing laws, at northeast corner Yorba Linda/Prospect, south side Bastanchury between Lakeview/Plumosa, northeast corner Lakeview/Altrudy, east side Lakeview south Lemon, southeast corner Yorba Linda/Eureka, east side Lakeview at Mariposa, and east side Plumosa south Avolinda?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7400, "no_votes": 6464, "total_votes": 13864, "percent_yes": 53.3756, "percent_no": 46.6244, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.035353", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.174280", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.020051", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ordinances be adopted amending the General Plan, Town Center Specific Plan, and zoning requirements to allow additional housing units at specific locations, some with increased building heights, in furtherance of meeting state mandated affordable housing laws, at northeast corner Yorba Linda/Prospect, south side Bastanchury between Lakeview/Plumosa, northeast corner Lakeview/Altrudy, east side Lakeview south Lemon, southeast corner Yorba Linda/Eureka, east side Lakeview at Mariposa, and east side Plumosa south Avolinda?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5840, "fingerprint": "2012|201200040|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200040|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c118e2c7f3154a24", "measure_id": "201200040", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Ordinance changing the office of Public Administrator for the County of Orange from an elected office to an appointed office be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 152135, "no_votes": 233054, "total_votes": 385189, "percent_yes": 39.4962, "percent_no": 60.5038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.172815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.019130", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance changing the office of Public Administrator for the County of Orange from an elected office to an appointed office be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5848, "fingerprint": "2012|201200413|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200413|ORANGE", "content_hash": "913537fc5ef9d594", "measure_id": "201200413", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade instructional technology in all classrooms and electrical wiring and power in all schools to accommodate computer and technology needs so that our students receive the necessary education to compete in the 21st Century, to renovate classrooms, sites, facilities nad acquire equipment, shall Fountain Valley Schoo District issue $23,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, mandate Citizen Oversight, annual independent annual audits, no money for teacher/administraors' salaries or pensions and all funds benefiting only Fountiain Valley schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11987, "no_votes": 11424, "total_votes": 23411, "percent_yes": 51.2024, "percent_no": 48.7976, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.175705", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.020960", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade instructional technology in all classrooms and electrical wiring and power in all schools to accommodate computer and technology needs so that our students receive the necessary education to compete in the 21st Century, to renovate classrooms, sites, facilities nad acquire equipment, shall Fountain Valley Schoo District issue $23,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, mandate Citizen Oversight, annual independent annual audits, no money for teacher/administraors' salaries or pensions and all funds benefiting only Fountiain Valley schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5855, "fingerprint": "2012|201200414|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200414|ORANGE", "content_hash": "cab5507309268dad", "measure_id": "201200414", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and improve classrooms and support facilities, upgrade libraries and science labs, increase student and teacher access to computers and modern classroom technology, improve student safety, replace leaky roofs and upgrade lighting, window, utility, heating, and ventilation systems to reduce annual operating costs shall the La Habra City School District be authorized to issue up to $31,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual\r\naudits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8874, "no_votes": 5615, "total_votes": 14489, "percent_yes": 61.246500000000005, "percent_no": 38.753499999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.178020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.022215", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and improve classrooms and support facilities, upgrade libraries and science labs, increase student and teacher access to computers and modern classroom technology, improve student safety, replace leaky roofs and upgrade lighting, window, utility, heating, and ventilation systems to reduce annual operating costs shall the La Habra City School District be authorized to issue up to $31,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual\r\naudits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5859, "fingerprint": "2012|201200415|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200415|ORANGE", "content_hash": "37b986faf6a0d2c0", "measure_id": "201200415", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade 1960\u2019s era schools/provide 21st Century education by retaining excellent teachers, improving math/science/technology classrooms, upgrading\r\nfire alarms, smoke detectors, earthquake safety, handicap accessibility, fixing leaky roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, removing asbestos/lead paint, constructing, repairing, acquiring equipment, sites/facilities, shall Ocean View School District issue $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring annual independent audits, Citizen\u2019s Oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions and prohibiting Sacramento from taking these local funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18700, "no_votes": 15997, "total_votes": 34697, "percent_yes": 53.8951, "percent_no": 46.1049, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.179152", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.022960", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade 1960\u2019s era schools/provide 21st Century education by retaining excellent teachers, improving math/science/technology classrooms, upgrading\r\nfire alarms, smoke detectors, earthquake safety, handicap accessibility, fixing leaky roofs, plumbing/electrical systems, removing asbestos/lead paint, constructing, repairing, acquiring equipment, sites/facilities, shall Ocean View School District issue $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring annual independent audits, Citizen\u2019s Oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions and prohibiting Sacramento from taking these local funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5861, "fingerprint": "2012|201200416|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200416|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d006e61071d5ec58", "measure_id": "201200416", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare Santa Ana College students for success in college/careers by upgrading career training facilities for science, nursing, technology and the trades, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, equipment, upgrade outdated classrooms and computer systems to keep pace with technology, improve student safety, security systems, and qualify for millions in State matching funds, shall the Santa Ana College Improvement District No. 1 of the Rancho Santiago Community College District issues $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, all money staying local", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45981, "no_votes": 17370, "total_votes": 63351, "percent_yes": 72.5813, "percent_no": 27.4187, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.179818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.023331", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare Santa Ana College students for success in college/careers by upgrading career training facilities for science, nursing, technology and the trades, repair, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, equipment, upgrade outdated classrooms and computer systems to keep pace with technology, improve student safety, security systems, and qualify for millions in State matching funds, shall the Santa Ana College Improvement District No. 1 of the Rancho Santiago Community College District issues $198,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators, all money staying local", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5862, "fingerprint": "2012|201200417|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200417|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0291a95f227acaa2", "measure_id": "201200417", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to upgrade Rowland Unified schools, repair, equip, construct and/or reconstruct classrooms, roofs, multiuse facilities, gyms/athletic facilities, libraries, science & technology labs, and construct permanent classrooms to replace temporary portables, shall Rowland Unified School District issue $158.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrative salaries or employee pensions, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16, "no_votes": 47, "total_votes": 63, "percent_yes": 25.3968, "percent_no": 74.6032, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.180090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.023516", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to upgrade Rowland Unified schools, repair, equip, construct and/or reconstruct classrooms, roofs, multiuse facilities, gyms/athletic facilities, libraries, science & technology labs, and construct permanent classrooms to replace temporary portables, shall Rowland Unified School District issue $158.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrative salaries or employee pensions, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5865, "fingerprint": "2012|201200418|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200418|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b8ead2a07fa5e454", "measure_id": "201200418", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare students for college and high-demand jobs, improve students' technology skills for today\u2019s higher standards, retain qualified teachers, improve instruction and career training in science, math and skilled trades, and maintain high-quality education; shall Tustin Unified School District upgrade classrooms, science labs, equipment, instructional technology and infrastructure by issuing $135 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrator compensation, all funds benefiting neighborhood schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25220, "no_votes": 16729, "total_votes": 41949, "percent_yes": 60.1206, "percent_no": 39.8794, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.180932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.024053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare students for college and high-demand jobs, improve students' technology skills for today\u2019s higher standards, retain qualified teachers, improve instruction and career training in science, math and skilled trades, and maintain high-quality education; shall Tustin Unified School District upgrade classrooms, science labs, equipment, instructional technology and infrastructure by issuing $135 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrator compensation, all funds benefiting neighborhood schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5845, "fingerprint": "2012|201200194|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200194|ORANGE", "content_hash": "520d38b857087158", "measure_id": "201200194", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance \"A Measure Regarding Limits on City Administrative and Legislative Compensation Applicable to the City of Brea\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8681, "no_votes": 7389, "total_votes": 16070, "percent_yes": 54.0199, "percent_no": 45.9801, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.174607", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.020231", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance \"A Measure Regarding Limits on City Administrative and Legislative Compensation Applicable to the City of Brea\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5846, "fingerprint": "2012|201200195|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200195|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fe1a508d9fbbff7d", "measure_id": "201200195", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance \"A Measure Adding Procedural Requirements Related to Public Records Act Requests Made to the City of Brea and Modifying Open Meeting Law Requirements Applicable to the City of Brea\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6903, "no_votes": 8917, "total_votes": 15820, "percent_yes": 43.6346, "percent_no": 56.3654, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.174897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.020412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance \"A Measure Adding Procedural Requirements Related to Public Records Act Requests Made to the City of Brea and Modifying Open Meeting Law Requirements Applicable to the City of Brea\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5847, "fingerprint": "2012|201200196|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200196|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2fb2fc54e8f0a589", "measure_id": "201200196", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Costa Mesa adopt a Proposed Charter as approved by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13806, "no_votes": 20529, "total_votes": 34335, "percent_yes": 40.2097, "percent_no": 59.7903, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.175441", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.020778", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Costa Mesa adopt a Proposed Charter as approved by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5849, "fingerprint": "2012|201200197|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200197|ORANGE", "content_hash": "75cbb395726ef7eb", "measure_id": "201200197", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 3169, entitled \"An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Fullerton, California, Approving a Development Agreement Between Pacific Coast Homes and\r\nthe City of Fullerton Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65864 Through 65869.5 for Property Located at 2701 Rosecrans Avenue That Provides Public Benefits to the City of Fullerton, Including Dedication of Approximately 283 Acres of Open Space, Endowment for Habitat Management, Support Grant for Perpetual Maintenance of\r\nRecreation Facilities and Other Benefits in Exchange for Granting the Property Owner a Vested Right to Build the Project in Accordance with Approved Plans,\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17551, "no_votes": 27253, "total_votes": 44804, "percent_yes": 39.1728, "percent_no": 60.8272, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.175979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.021141", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 3169, entitled \"An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Fullerton, California, Approving a Development Agreement Between Pacific Coast Homes and\r\nthe City of Fullerton Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65864 Through 65869.5 for Property Located at 2701 Rosecrans Avenue That Provides Public Benefits to the City of Fullerton, Including Dedication of Approximately 283 Acres of Open Space, Endowment for Habitat Management, Support Grant for Perpetual Maintenance of\r\nRecreation Facilities and Other Benefits in Exchange for Granting the Property Owner a Vested Right to Build the Project in Accordance with Approved Plans,\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5850, "fingerprint": "2012|201200198|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200198|ORANGE", "content_hash": "dd718923d15902dd", "measure_id": "201200198", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 3183 be approved by the voters to amend Chapter 7.26 of the Fullerton Municipal Code to permit the sale, possession and use of safe and sane fireworks in the City of Fullerton?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24067, "no_votes": 21231, "total_votes": 45298, "percent_yes": 53.1304, "percent_no": 46.8696, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.176320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.021322", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 3183 be approved by the voters to amend Chapter 7.26 of the Fullerton Municipal Code to permit the sale, possession and use of safe and sane fireworks in the City of Fullerton?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5851, "fingerprint": "2012|201200199|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200199|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8b9347d284fcd7c9", "measure_id": "201200199", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance amending the Garden Grove Municipal Code to increase the Hotel Visitors Tax from 13% to 14.5% and to clarify the scope and manner in which the Hotel\r\nVisitors Tax applies be adopted to help preserve general City services such as police and fire protection, street operations and maintenance, and parks and recreation\r\nservices?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29392, "no_votes": 14830, "total_votes": 44222, "percent_yes": 66.4647, "percent_no": 33.53530000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.176624", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.021500", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance amending the Garden Grove Municipal Code to increase the Hotel Visitors Tax from 13% to 14.5% and to clarify the scope and manner in which the Hotel\r\nVisitors Tax applies be adopted to help preserve general City services such as police and fire protection, street operations and maintenance, and parks and recreation\r\nservices?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5853, "fingerprint": "2012|201200201|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200201|ORANGE", "content_hash": "44b0f9e4e31bfd47", "measure_id": "201200201", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed Charter Amendment, amending Section 607 of the Charter of the City of Huntington Beach entitled Tax Limits, as set forth in the proposed measure be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37884, "no_votes": 38707, "total_votes": 76591, "percent_yes": 49.4627, "percent_no": 50.5373, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.177187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.021860", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed Charter Amendment, amending Section 607 of the Charter of the City of Huntington Beach entitled Tax Limits, as set forth in the proposed measure be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5867, "fingerprint": "2012|201200041|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200041|PLACER", "content_hash": "f19ee58fce79f701", "measure_id": "201200041", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase existing direct charges for residential development by $40 per unit; for mobile home parks by $20 per unit; for commercial/ industrial development by $0.046 per square foot for fire protection, emergency medical, prevention services and equipment replacement in North Auburn \u2013 Ophir Fire (CSA 28, Zone 193) (Charges approved in this measure are subject to an annual cost of living adjustment not to exceed 3% in any year)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2450, "no_votes": 3487, "total_votes": 5937, "percent_yes": 41.2666, "percent_no": 58.7334, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.181616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.024425", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase existing direct charges for residential development by $40 per unit; for mobile home parks by $20 per unit; for commercial/ industrial development by $0.046 per square foot for fire protection, emergency medical, prevention services and equipment replacement in North Auburn \u2013 Ophir Fire (CSA 28, Zone 193) (Charges approved in this measure are subject to an annual cost of living adjustment not to exceed 3% in any year)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5868, "fingerprint": "2012|201200210|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200210|PLACER", "content_hash": "92b1ede7fe7abe89", "measure_id": "201200210", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To reduce traffic congestion/tourist impacts, support transportation services, build/maintain local bike trails, parks, indoor recreation opportunities, sidewalks, and beaches, and other public services, shall Placer County continue for 10 additional years, with no increase, the existing 2% North Lake Tahoe portion of the Transient Occupancy Tax - paid only by lodging guests, not by local taxpayers - with annual independent audits, continued local oversight, and all funds exclusively for North Lake Tahoe?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2378, "no_votes": 434, "total_votes": 2812, "percent_yes": 84.5661, "percent_no": 15.433899999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.182057", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.024642", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce traffic congestion/tourist impacts, support transportation services, build/maintain local bike trails, parks, indoor recreation opportunities, sidewalks, and beaches, and other public services, shall Placer County continue for 10 additional years, with no increase, the existing 2% North Lake Tahoe portion of the Transient Occupancy Tax - paid only by lodging guests, not by local taxpayers - with annual independent audits, continued local oversight, and all funds exclusively for North Lake Tahoe?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5869, "fingerprint": "2012|201200419|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200419|PLACER", "content_hash": "e0396e808eab5768", "measure_id": "201200419", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the election of one member of the governing board of the Twin Rivers Unified School District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area\u2014Yes---No.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62, "no_votes": 30, "total_votes": 92, "percent_yes": 67.3913, "percent_no": 32.6087, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.182360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.024828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the election of one member of the governing board of the Twin Rivers Unified School District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area\u2014Yes---No.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5870, "fingerprint": "2012|201200211|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200211|PLACER", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "201200211", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7637, "no_votes": 10627, "total_votes": 18264, "percent_yes": 41.8145, "percent_no": 58.1855, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.182661", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.025022", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5866, "fingerprint": "2012|201200209|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200209|PLACER", "content_hash": "19c558b6ef3784ad", "measure_id": "201200209", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Home Rule for Auburn Charter of 2012 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1457, "no_votes": 2610, "total_votes": 4067, "percent_yes": 35.8249, "percent_no": 64.1751, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.181269", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.024244", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Home Rule for Auburn Charter of 2012 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5871, "fingerprint": "2012|201200042|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200042|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "0ac4d8271a393c6c", "measure_id": "201200042", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 12-1088 be enacted? (The Ordinance would amend section 3-4.03 of the Plumas County Code to change the existing Transient Occupancy Tax in the unincorporated area of the county from nine percent (9%) to eleven percent (11%) effective January 1, 2013, with the proceeds of the tax to be used for general governmental purposes. The Ordinance shall be automatically repealed by its own terms and of no further force or effect on January 1, 2017, causing such tax rate to revert to nine percent (9%) on January 1, 2017).", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3660, "no_votes": 5313, "total_votes": 8973, "percent_yes": 40.789, "percent_no": 59.211, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.183039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.025203", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 12-1088 be enacted? (The Ordinance would amend section 3-4.03 of the Plumas County Code to change the existing Transient Occupancy Tax in the unincorporated area of the county from nine percent (9%) to eleven percent (11%) effective January 1, 2013, with the proceeds of the tax to be used for general governmental purposes. The Ordinance shall be automatically repealed by its own terms and of no further force or effect on January 1, 2017, causing such tax rate to revert to nine percent (9%) on January 1, 2017).", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5872, "fingerprint": "2012|201200043|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200043|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "04ae94a4c7dd8749", "measure_id": "201200043", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Plumas County Ordinance No. 12- 1089 be enacted adding Chapter 16 to Title 3 of the Plumas County Code to impose a transactions and use tax at a rate of 0.25%\r\nwithin the incorporated and unincorporated territory of Plumas County and requiring that all funds generated as a result of the tax to be spent for general governmental purposes, with the tax to be operative on April 1, 2013, and the authority to levy the tax to expire January 1, 2017?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3456, "no_votes": 6159, "total_votes": 9615, "percent_yes": 35.9438, "percent_no": 64.05619999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.183331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.025392", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Plumas County Ordinance No. 12- 1089 be enacted adding Chapter 16 to Title 3 of the Plumas County Code to impose a transactions and use tax at a rate of 0.25%\r\nwithin the incorporated and unincorporated territory of Plumas County and requiring that all funds generated as a result of the tax to be spent for general governmental purposes, with the tax to be operative on April 1, 2013, and the authority to levy the tax to expire January 1, 2017?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5892, "fingerprint": "2012|201200225|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200225|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8d920d9b9aa6c438", "measure_id": "201200225", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on July 30, 2012, by the Executive Officer on behalf of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside ordering the reorganization affecting the City of San Jacinto and the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District, providing for Annexation 78 to the City of San Jacinto and detachment from the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District (Parcels A & B), and Detachment from the City of San Jacinto Parcel C ( ) be confirmed sub ect to the terms and conditions s j pecified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 99, "no_votes": 268, "total_votes": 367, "percent_yes": 26.975500000000004, "percent_no": 73.02449999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.190127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.029448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on July 30, 2012, by the Executive Officer on behalf of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside ordering the reorganization affecting the City of San Jacinto and the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District, providing for Annexation 78 to the City of San Jacinto and detachment from the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District (Parcels A & B), and Detachment from the City of San Jacinto Parcel C ( ) be confirmed sub ect to the terms and conditions s j pecified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5883, "fingerprint": "2012|201200219|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200219|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b72e275258f1d4e4", "measure_id": "201200219", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the permanent annual appropriations limit of the City of Eastvale be set at $15,518,412?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6935, "no_votes": 4457, "total_votes": 11392, "percent_yes": 60.8761, "percent_no": 39.1239, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.187249", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.027664", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the permanent annual appropriations limit of the City of Eastvale be set at $15,518,412?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5874, "fingerprint": "2012|201200212|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200212|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "9bc3ad80a18a7ed7", "measure_id": "201200212", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to include a new Charter officer, the City Auditor, appointed by the City Council, with the powers and duties of the City Auditor set by ordinance of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13947, "no_votes": 16399, "total_votes": 30346, "percent_yes": 45.9599, "percent_no": 54.0401, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.184006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.025767", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to include a new Charter officer, the City Auditor, appointed by the City Council, with the powers and duties of the City Auditor set by ordinance of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5875, "fingerprint": "2012|201200213|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200213|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f20709ddfa731089", "measure_id": "201200213", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended by adding a new section 811, entitled \"Commission on Sustainability,\" which would create a new commission to advise the Mayor and City Council on matters of sustainability as it pertains to environmental stewardship, economic development, and regional advantages as a means of pursuing a higher quality of life, with the powers and duties of that commission set by ordinance of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10638, "no_votes": 19704, "total_votes": 30342, "percent_yes": 35.0603, "percent_no": 64.9397, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.184332", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.025954", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended by adding a new section 811, entitled \"Commission on Sustainability,\" which would create a new commission to advise the Mayor and City Council on matters of sustainability as it pertains to environmental stewardship, economic development, and regional advantages as a means of pursuing a higher quality of life, with the powers and duties of that commission set by ordinance of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5876, "fingerprint": "2012|201200214|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200214|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "27240dd12a00ed83", "measure_id": "201200214", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that if in the June election for City Council, no candidate for City Council receives a majority of the total votes cast, that the run-off election be held on the last Tuesday in August instead of on the first Tuesday in November?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10738, "no_votes": 19713, "total_votes": 30451, "percent_yes": 35.2632, "percent_no": 64.7368, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.184628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.026137", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that if in the June election for City Council, no candidate for City Council receives a majority of the total votes cast, that the run-off election be held on the last Tuesday in August instead of on the first Tuesday in November?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5877, "fingerprint": "2012|201200215|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200215|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cdd754361602e83b", "measure_id": "201200215", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to eliminate the authority of the City Manager to approve or disapprove appointments and removals of subordinate employees of any Charter officer, including the City Clerk and City Attorney?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16665, "no_votes": 13444, "total_votes": 30109, "percent_yes": 55.3489, "percent_no": 44.6511, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.185025", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.026317", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to eliminate the authority of the City Manager to approve or disapprove appointments and removals of subordinate employees of any Charter officer, including the City Clerk and City Attorney?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5878, "fingerprint": "2012|201200216|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200216|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "713e60397f64b9d1", "measure_id": "201200216", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that bids for public works contracts be advertised by electronic means instead of in the newspaper?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14126, "no_votes": 16392, "total_votes": 30518, "percent_yes": 46.2874, "percent_no": 53.7126, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.185320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.026527", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that bids for public works contracts be advertised by electronic means instead of in the newspaper?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5879, "fingerprint": "2012|201200217|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200217|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "35b1c9346d453f6a", "measure_id": "201200217", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended by making certain non-substantive updates, related to change of position titles, elimination of paper copy distribution of certain documents to City officials, posting of certain documents (budget, external audit) on the internet, word corrections, deletion of obsolete language, reflection of current practices, elimination of references to taxes no longer being collected, adding \"accessible\" before \"website\" throughout the Charter, and timing of the Charter Review process?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15389, "no_votes": 14236, "total_votes": 29625, "percent_yes": 51.946000000000005, "percent_no": 48.053999999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.185612", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.026708", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended by making certain non-substantive updates, related to change of position titles, elimination of paper copy distribution of certain documents to City officials, posting of certain documents (budget, external audit) on the internet, word corrections, deletion of obsolete language, reflection of current practices, elimination of references to taxes no longer being collected, adding \"accessible\" before \"website\" throughout the Charter, and timing of the Charter Review process?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5880, "fingerprint": "2012|201200421|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200421|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "fdd78f2c7b5100e8", "measure_id": "201200421", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect the quality of education in our local schools, relieve overcrowding and provide safe/modern schools, shall the Val Verde Unified School District update computers/technology in classrooms/science labs/libraries; provide facilities/equipment for career training/education; make funds available to attract/retain qualified teachers and protect academic instruction; construct new high school facilities to relieve overcrowding by issuing $178 million in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, independent oversight and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2758, "no_votes": 1697, "total_votes": 4455, "percent_yes": 61.908, "percent_no": 38.092, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.186294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.027072", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of education in our local schools, relieve overcrowding and provide safe/modern schools, shall the Val Verde Unified School District update computers/technology in classrooms/science labs/libraries; provide facilities/equipment for career training/education; make funds available to attract/retain qualified teachers and protect academic instruction; construct new high school facilities to relieve overcrowding by issuing $178 million in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, independent oversight and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11423, "fingerprint": "2012|201200218|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200218|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2e64d71bf502f19f", "measure_id": "201200218", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to remove oversight of the maintenance of parkways, shrubs, and trees within street right-of-way from the Park and Recreation Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13575, "no_votes": 16449, "total_votes": 30024, "percent_yes": 45.2138, "percent_no": 54.7862, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.042757", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.185912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.026892", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to remove oversight of the maintenance of parkways, shrubs, and trees within street right-of-way from the Park and Recreation Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5873, "fingerprint": "2012|201200420|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200420|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f5af2f54cd115191", "measure_id": "201200420", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing tax rates, to provide quality education, improve safety, and train students for today's jobs, shall Jurupa Unified School District repair aging, leaky roofs, remove asbestos; improve fire safety/security; improve career training technology/facilities/equipment; upgrade classrooms/science laboratories/libraries technology for 21st-Century skills,; ensure safe, adequate student restrooms; renovate or repair elementary , middle and high school facilities by issuing $125 million in bonds at legal rates with independent oversight and all funds used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3703, "no_votes": 3414, "total_votes": 7117, "percent_yes": 52.0303, "percent_no": 47.9697, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.183703", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.025582", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing tax rates, to provide quality education, improve safety, and train students for today's jobs, shall Jurupa Unified School District repair aging, leaky roofs, remove asbestos; improve fire safety/security; improve career training technology/facilities/equipment; upgrade classrooms/science laboratories/libraries technology for 21st-Century skills,; ensure safe, adequate student restrooms; renovate or repair elementary , middle and high school facilities by issuing $125 million in bonds at legal rates with independent oversight and all funds used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5889, "fingerprint": "2012|201200224|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200224|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b13b91bd8e6a3ffe", "measure_id": "201200224", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting automated traffic enforcement systems be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18310, "no_votes": 13684, "total_votes": 31994, "percent_yes": 57.2295, "percent_no": 42.7705, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.189118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.028893", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting automated traffic enforcement systems be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5895, "fingerprint": "2012|201200428|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200428|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ba7a6a78143acdac", "measure_id": "201200428", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade local schools in Yucaipa and Calimesa, and protect quality education with funding under local control, shall Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School District: Upgrade computers/instructional technology to support math, science, reading, writing; Add/upgrade career education and vocational classrooms, labs, technology; Repair, improve or replace leaky roofs, aging/deteriorating classrooms, restrooms and school facilities to meet safety requirements; by issuing $98,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for district administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1095, "no_votes": 1108, "total_votes": 2203, "percent_yes": 49.7049, "percent_no": 50.2951, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.191109", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.029999", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade local schools in Yucaipa and Calimesa, and protect quality education with funding under local control, shall Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School District: Upgrade computers/instructional technology to support math, science, reading, writing; Add/upgrade career education and vocational classrooms, labs, technology; Repair, improve or replace leaky roofs, aging/deteriorating classrooms, restrooms and school facilities to meet safety requirements; by issuing $98,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for district administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5888, "fingerprint": "2012|201200223|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200223|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "da0943b4496d555f", "measure_id": "201200223", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the permanent annual appropriations limit of the City of Jurupa Valley be set at $28,967,355?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9601, "no_votes": 6806, "total_votes": 16407, "percent_yes": 58.5177, "percent_no": 41.4823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.188815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.028709", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the permanent annual appropriations limit of the City of Jurupa Valley be set at $28,967,355?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5885, "fingerprint": "2012|201200220|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200220|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d02d6eab2a404294", "measure_id": "201200220", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance of the City of Indian Wells pertaining to the appointment of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, to provide for an automatic annual rotation of Council Members who occupy the positions of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, be adopted to permit as many Council Members as possible to have an opportunity during their membership on the City Council to occupy the position of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1511, "no_votes": 764, "total_votes": 2275, "percent_yes": 66.4176, "percent_no": 33.58240000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.187834", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.028043", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance of the City of Indian Wells pertaining to the appointment of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, to provide for an automatic annual rotation of Council Members who occupy the positions of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, be adopted to permit as many Council Members as possible to have an opportunity during their membership on the City Council to occupy the position of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5886, "fingerprint": "2012|201200221|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200221|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2bce06ac248f69fb", "measure_id": "201200221", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance of the City of Indian Wells authorizing the City to impose, levy, and collect a Special Parcel Tax of $171 on all taxable property within the City, commencing July 1, 2013, providing for annual adjustments for inflation, and suspending the existing assessments levied on property within Landscape and Lighting District No. 91-1, be adopted to provide sufficient revenues for the maintenance and servicing of citywide public landscape improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 592, "no_votes": 1718, "total_votes": 2310, "percent_yes": 25.6277, "percent_no": 74.3723, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.188229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.028227", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance of the City of Indian Wells authorizing the City to impose, levy, and collect a Special Parcel Tax of $171 on all taxable property within the City, commencing July 1, 2013, providing for annual adjustments for inflation, and suspending the existing assessments levied on property within Landscape and Lighting District No. 91-1, be adopted to provide sufficient revenues for the maintenance and servicing of citywide public landscape improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5887, "fingerprint": "2012|201200222|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200222|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ac80cc23efeaf303", "measure_id": "201200222", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Indian Wells be amended to limit, except as may be required by Federal or State law, the amount of compensation to 1) City Council Members to $1,000, 2) the Mayor to $1,500 and 3) the Mayor Pro Tempore to $1,250 per month, subject to an annual CPI adjustment, plus reimbursement for expenses reasonably incurred in the performance of their duties and approved in advance by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1871, "no_votes": 446, "total_votes": 2317, "percent_yes": 80.75099999999999, "percent_no": 19.24900000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.188519", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.028408", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Indian Wells be amended to limit, except as may be required by Federal or State law, the amount of compensation to 1) City Council Members to $1,000, 2) the Mayor to $1,500 and 3) the Mayor Pro Tempore to $1,250 per month, subject to an annual CPI adjustment, plus reimbursement for expenses reasonably incurred in the performance of their duties and approved in advance by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5891, "fingerprint": "2012|201200426|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200426|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d026e6b0d7debf29", "measure_id": "201200426", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To help attract teachers; improve career/college readiness, student safety, and academic performance; in Menifee, Perris, Romoland and Nuevo secondary schools; by: Improving classrooms, science labs, vocational education, instructional technology; Removing hazardous materials; Upgrading fire safety, wiring, school security, handicapped accessibility; Adding classrooms, including a new Menifee high school, to reduce overcrowding and accommodate growing enrollment; Shall Perris Union High School District issue 153.42 million dollars in bonds, at legal rates, with local control, independent citizen oversight of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24229, "no_votes": 15657, "total_votes": 39886, "percent_yes": 60.7456, "percent_no": 39.2544, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.189708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.029255", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help attract teachers; improve career/college readiness, student safety, and academic performance; in Menifee, Perris, Romoland and Nuevo secondary schools; by: Improving classrooms, science labs, vocational education, instructional technology; Removing hazardous materials; Upgrading fire safety, wiring, school security, handicapped accessibility; Adding classrooms, including a new Menifee high school, to reduce overcrowding and accommodate growing enrollment; Shall Perris Union High School District issue 153.42 million dollars in bonds, at legal rates, with local control, independent citizen oversight of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5884, "fingerprint": "2012|201200424|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200424|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "80f871e323007868", "measure_id": "201200424", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue renovating, equipping and constructing classrooms/school facilities throughout the District; upgrade/replace outdated heating, ventilation, airconditioning systems and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $49,000,000 of Hemet Unified School District bonds, previously approved by voters in 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for District administration, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25661, "no_votes": 11626, "total_votes": 37287, "percent_yes": 68.8202, "percent_no": 31.1798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.187539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.027861", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue renovating, equipping and constructing classrooms/school facilities throughout the District; upgrade/replace outdated heating, ventilation, airconditioning systems and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $49,000,000 of Hemet Unified School District bonds, previously approved by voters in 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for District administration, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5890, "fingerprint": "2012|201200425|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200425|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f3b895813df3f4db", "measure_id": "201200425", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student access to computers and technology; continue renovating, repairing, equipping and constructing elementary classrooms/school facilities; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $4,000,000 of Nuview Union School District bonds, previously approved by voters in June 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1632, "no_votes": 894, "total_votes": 2526, "percent_yes": 64.60810000000001, "percent_no": 35.39189999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.189408", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.029073", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student access to computers and technology; continue renovating, repairing, equipping and constructing elementary classrooms/school facilities; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $4,000,000 of Nuview Union School District bonds, previously approved by voters in June 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5881, "fingerprint": "2012|201200422|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200422|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "fed17b800ca929a9", "measure_id": "201200422", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To fund classroom/school renovation/construction including vocational education facilities, heating/air-conditioning, science labs, computer/technology access; and finance voter-approved educational projects, shall $79,000,000 of Alvord Unified School District bonds, approved by voters in November 2007, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12911, "no_votes": 7691, "total_votes": 20602, "percent_yes": 62.6687, "percent_no": 37.3313, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.186655", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.027252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund classroom/school renovation/construction including vocational education facilities, heating/air-conditioning, science labs, computer/technology access; and finance voter-approved educational projects, shall $79,000,000 of Alvord Unified School District bonds, approved by voters in November 2007, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5882, "fingerprint": "2012|201200423|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200423|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "84fa523b1854b25a", "measure_id": "201200423", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To meet the needs of 21st Century classrooms shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District upgrade electrical and computer systems to keep pace with current and future technology, enhance student learning capabilities, provide mobile learning devices to support modern teaching and educational methods and complete school facility upgrades and projects by issuing 41 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6714, "no_votes": 3513, "total_votes": 10227, "percent_yes": 65.6498, "percent_no": 34.3502, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.186956", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.027432", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To meet the needs of 21st Century classrooms shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District upgrade electrical and computer systems to keep pace with current and future technology, enhance student learning capabilities, provide mobile learning devices to support modern teaching and educational methods and complete school facility upgrades and projects by issuing 41 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5893, "fingerprint": "2012|201200427|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200427|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ef81adb2fec57c86", "measure_id": "201200427", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the quality of education in local schools and to provide facilities and equipment for career and technical education classes in health, science, technology and the trades, to upgrade classrooms, science labs and computers to keep pace with technology, improve student safety and security, shall Temecula Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $165 million in bonds and appoint a fiscal oversight committee with annual audits to ensure that bond funds are spent to benefit local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27808, "no_votes": 16071, "total_votes": 43879, "percent_yes": 63.37429999999999, "percent_no": 36.62570000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.190426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.029630", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of education in local schools and to provide facilities and equipment for career and technical education classes in health, science, technology and the trades, to upgrade classrooms, science labs and computers to keep pace with technology, improve student safety and security, shall Temecula Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $165 million in bonds and appoint a fiscal oversight committee with annual audits to ensure that bond funds are spent to benefit local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5894, "fingerprint": "2012|201200226|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200226|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7202e1a120277913", "measure_id": "201200226", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To reopen closed community parks, prevent closure of Marna O'Brien Park (the last open City park), restore funding for recreational services/community events, maintain safe playground equipment, clean public restrooms, sports fields, and youth/children's recreation/after-school programs, restore park security patrols/safety lighting, and remove graffiti; shall the City of Wildomar levy $28 per parcel annually, with required independent financial audits, and requiring that all funds are used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6615, "no_votes": 3135, "total_votes": 9750, "percent_yes": 67.8462, "percent_no": 32.153800000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.190719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.029814", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reopen closed community parks, prevent closure of Marna O'Brien Park (the last open City park), restore funding for recreational services/community events, maintain safe playground equipment, clean public restrooms, sports fields, and youth/children's recreation/after-school programs, restore park security patrols/safety lighting, and remove graffiti; shall the City of Wildomar levy $28 per parcel annually, with required independent financial audits, and requiring that all funds are used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5896, "fingerprint": "2012|201200429|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200429|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "e0396e808eab5768", "measure_id": "201200429", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the election of one member of the governing board of the Twin Rivers Unified School District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area\u2014Yes---No.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10756, "no_votes": 6737, "total_votes": 17493, "percent_yes": 61.4875, "percent_no": 38.5125, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.191446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.030181", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the election of one member of the governing board of the Twin Rivers Unified School District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area\u2014Yes---No.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5897, "fingerprint": "2012|201200227|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200227|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "1c088d532fdc74d6", "measure_id": "201200227", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to modify the City's existing Utility User Tax to treat taxpayers equally; and to temporarily increase the current rate by 1.75%, for 10 years, for the following restricted uses: additional police officers, programs to prevent youth crime/violence, police equipment and technology, and resurfacing city streets?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12726, "no_votes": 16129, "total_votes": 28855, "percent_yes": 44.1033, "percent_no": 55.8967, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.191871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.030378", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to modify the City's existing Utility User Tax to treat taxpayers equally; and to temporarily increase the current rate by 1.75%, for 10 years, for the following restricted uses: additional police officers, programs to prevent youth crime/violence, police equipment and technology, and resurfacing city streets?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5899, "fingerprint": "2012|201200228|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200228|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "3a6fd402c31f3cc7", "measure_id": "201200228", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring each cardroom within the City to pay the City a tax of 2% of annual gross gaming revenues commencing on January 1, 2014; then in each year thereafter, a tax of 3% of annual gross gaming revenues up to $5,000,000, and a tax of 4% of annual gross gaming revenues over $5,000,000, to fund general municipal services such as public safety, street maintenance, and neighborhood improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16288, "no_votes": 4088, "total_votes": 20376, "percent_yes": 79.93719999999999, "percent_no": 20.06280000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.192462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.030742", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring each cardroom within the City to pay the City a tax of 2% of annual gross gaming revenues commencing on January 1, 2014; then in each year thereafter, a tax of 3% of annual gross gaming revenues up to $5,000,000, and a tax of 4% of annual gross gaming revenues over $5,000,000, to fund general municipal services such as public safety, street maintenance, and neighborhood improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5900, "fingerprint": "2012|201200229|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200229|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "4ca0fca0cf646e80", "measure_id": "201200229", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a charter commission be elected to propose a new charter or to revise the charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32813, "no_votes": 91233, "total_votes": 124046, "percent_yes": 26.4523, "percent_no": 73.54769999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.192760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.030924", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a charter commission be elected to propose a new charter or to revise the charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5905, "fingerprint": "2012|201200433|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200433|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "345a9241b35c0ca9", "measure_id": "201200433", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at every school, modernize aging classrooms, upgrade technology, provide 21st century learning opportunities, improve student safety and become eligible for millions in additional State dollars, shall the San Juan Unified School District issue $350,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit and appoint a citizens' oversight committee, conduct annual independent audits, and spend funds only on school and classroom improvements, with NO money used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76052, "no_votes": 50281, "total_votes": 126333, "percent_yes": 60.1996, "percent_no": 39.8004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.194540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.031884", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at every school, modernize aging classrooms, upgrade technology, provide 21st century learning opportunities, improve student safety and become eligible for millions in additional State dollars, shall the San Juan Unified School District issue $350,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit and appoint a citizens' oversight committee, conduct annual independent audits, and spend funds only on school and classroom improvements, with NO money used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5898, "fingerprint": "2012|201200430|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200430|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "ae79204adc56c1cd", "measure_id": "201200430", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of academic instruction in core subjects like math, science and writing, shall Facilities Improvement District No. 4 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue $68,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, to construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, upgrade instructional technology, student safety and security systems, upgrade, repair and equip classrooms, with citizen oversight, annual public audits, with all funds spent only in Rancho Cordova and no administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11677, "no_votes": 4660, "total_votes": 16337, "percent_yes": 71.4758, "percent_no": 28.524199999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.192169", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.030560", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of academic instruction in core subjects like math, science and writing, shall Facilities Improvement District No. 4 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue $68,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, to construct, acquire, repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment, upgrade instructional technology, student safety and security systems, upgrade, repair and equip classrooms, with citizen oversight, annual public audits, with all funds spent only in Rancho Cordova and no administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5903, "fingerprint": "2012|201200431|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200431|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "fda73e0341c8032d", "measure_id": "201200431", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare students for college and careers by upgrading classrooms, science labs, computer systems and technology; renovating heating and ventilation systems; reducing costs through energy efficiency;improving student safety and security systems; repairing roofs, floors, walkways, bathrooms, electrical, plumbing and sewer systems; shall Sacramento City Unified School District issue $346 million in bonds with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and mandatory annual audits to guarantee funds are spent properly to benefit local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 74681, "no_votes": 31847, "total_votes": 106528, "percent_yes": 70.10459999999999, "percent_no": 29.89540000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.193879", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.031484", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare students for college and careers by upgrading classrooms, science labs, computer systems and technology; renovating heating and ventilation systems; reducing costs through energy efficiency;improving student safety and security systems; repairing roofs, floors, walkways, bathrooms, electrical, plumbing and sewer systems; shall Sacramento City Unified School District issue $346 million in bonds with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and mandatory annual audits to guarantee funds are spent properly to benefit local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5904, "fingerprint": "2012|201200432|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200432|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "129b3f189efe0be1", "measure_id": "201200432", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the health and safety of children, repair playgrounds and playfields to meet modern safety standards, improve physical education facilities and bathrooms, improve irrigation systems and water drainage to reduce water consumption, remove asbestos, lead paint and other unsafe conditions and to upgrade kitchen facilities to improve nutrition and nutritional education for children, shall the Sacramento City Unified School District issue $68 million of bonds, with independent Citizen's Oversight and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71820, "no_votes": 34014, "total_votes": 105834, "percent_yes": 67.861, "percent_no": 32.138999999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.194171", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.031697", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the health and safety of children, repair playgrounds and playfields to meet modern safety standards, improve physical education facilities and bathrooms, improve irrigation systems and water drainage to reduce water consumption, remove asbestos, lead paint and other unsafe conditions and to upgrade kitchen facilities to improve nutrition and nutritional education for children, shall the Sacramento City Unified School District issue $68 million of bonds, with independent Citizen's Oversight and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5901, "fingerprint": "2012|201200230|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200230|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "34406d0d4dbfa054", "measure_id": "201200230", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Relating to the deposit and collection of yard and garden refuse in the City of Sacramento, Shall the ordinance enacted by voter approval of Measure A at the City of Sacramento municipal election on September 27, 1977 be repealed, which would then allow the Sacramento City Council to require yard and garden refuse to be placed into containers for collection?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 69737, "no_votes": 66071, "total_votes": 135808, "percent_yes": 51.3497, "percent_no": 48.6503, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.193048", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.031104", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Relating to the deposit and collection of yard and garden refuse in the City of Sacramento, Shall the ordinance enacted by voter approval of Measure A at the City of Sacramento municipal election on September 27, 1977 be repealed, which would then allow the Sacramento City Council to require yard and garden refuse to be placed into containers for collection?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5902, "fingerprint": "2012|201200231|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200231|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "d538d7726b061033", "measure_id": "201200231", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "City of Sacramento Essential Services Protection Measure To restore and protect essential public safety services, including 9-1-1 response, police officers, gang/youth violence prevention, fire protection/emergency medical response, and other essential services including park maintenance, youth/senior services, and libraries, shall the City enact a one-half cent sales tax for six years with all revenue legally required to stay in the City's General Fund, none for the State, with independent annual financial audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 88733, "no_votes": 49608, "total_votes": 138341, "percent_yes": 64.1408, "percent_no": 35.8592, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.193579", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.031285", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Sacramento Essential Services Protection Measure To restore and protect essential public safety services, including 9-1-1 response, police officers, gang/youth violence prevention, fire protection/emergency medical response, and other essential services including park maintenance, youth/senior services, and libraries, shall the City enact a one-half cent sales tax for six years with all revenue legally required to stay in the City's General Fund, none for the State, with independent annual financial audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5906, "fingerprint": "2012|201200232|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200232|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "5cedba7bfbfdd848", "measure_id": "201200232", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and reduce the number of council districts from five to four?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3142, "no_votes": 1276, "total_votes": 4418, "percent_yes": 71.1182, "percent_no": 28.8818, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.194932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.032065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and reduce the number of council districts from five to four?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5907, "fingerprint": "2012|201200233|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200233|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "6eaaee9a7f520351", "measure_id": "201200233", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years of four years? Yes= two years, No= four years", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2676, "no_votes": 1620, "total_votes": 4296, "percent_yes": 62.2905, "percent_no": 37.7095, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.195221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.032243", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years of four years? Yes= two years, No= four years", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5908, "fingerprint": "2012|201200234|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200234|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201200234", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1955, "no_votes": 2410, "total_votes": 4365, "percent_yes": 44.7881, "percent_no": 55.2119, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.195562", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.032422", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5909, "fingerprint": "2012|201200235|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200235|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "24bb7fba965bc279", "measure_id": "201200235", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved enacting a one percent (1%) sales tax for the purpose of funding general city services, such as police, fire safety, gang intervention and prevention, recreation programs, and street and parks maintenance, that will automatically expire five years after its operative date and that will require annual review and public report on revenues and expenditures by an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5751, "no_votes": 4196, "total_votes": 9947, "percent_yes": 57.8164, "percent_no": 42.1836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.195859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.032606", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved enacting a one percent (1%) sales tax for the purpose of funding general city services, such as police, fire safety, gang intervention and prevention, recreation programs, and street and parks maintenance, that will automatically expire five years after its operative date and that will require annual review and public report on revenues and expenditures by an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 5910, "fingerprint": "2012|201200434|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200434|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6c4719028a61abdf", "measure_id": "201200434", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect local school from State budget cuts, provide locally controlled funding that the State can't take away, preserve quality education in reading, math and science, retain qualified teachers, restore smaller class size, keep school libraries open, provide academic technology and prepare students for careers, shall Bear Valley Unified School District authorize to levy $49.50 per parcel annually for four years with independent oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, exempting seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2248, "no_votes": 2116, "total_votes": 4364, "percent_yes": 51.5124, "percent_no": 48.4876, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-07-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.196150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.032789", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect local school from State budget cuts, provide locally controlled funding that the State can't take away, preserve quality education in reading, math and science, retain qualified teachers, restore smaller class size, keep school libraries open, provide academic technology and prepare students for careers, shall Bear Valley Unified School District authorize to levy $49.50 per parcel annually for four years with independent oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, exempting seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5917, "fingerprint": "2012|201200436|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200436|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "9598817321ddfdf2", "measure_id": "201200436", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make schools clean and safe and provide educational opportunities by repairing and replacing leaky roofs, deteriorating classrooms, fire alarms, security/electrical systems, removing asbestos, providing educationa opportunities by updating classroom technology, science labs, and vocational education programs, and acquiring, constructing, repairing classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment shall San Bernardino City Unified School District issue $250,000,000 bonds at legal rates, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions or Sacramento, keeping all funds local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34902, "no_votes": 13971, "total_votes": 48873, "percent_yes": 71.4137, "percent_no": 28.586299999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.198552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.034070", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make schools clean and safe and provide educational opportunities by repairing and replacing leaky roofs, deteriorating classrooms, fire alarms, security/electrical systems, removing asbestos, providing educationa opportunities by updating classroom technology, science labs, and vocational education programs, and acquiring, constructing, repairing classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment shall San Bernardino City Unified School District issue $250,000,000 bonds at legal rates, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries/pensions or Sacramento, keeping all funds local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5918, "fingerprint": "2012|201200437|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200437|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ba7a6a78143acdac", "measure_id": "201200437", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade local schools in Yucaipa and Calimesa, and protect quality education with funding under local control, shall Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School District: Upgrade computers/instructional technology to support math, science, reading, writing; Add/upgrade career education and vocational classrooms, labs, technology; Repair, improve or replace leaky roofs, aging/deteriorating classrooms, restrooms and school facilities to meet safety requirements; by issuing $98,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for district administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9691, "no_votes": 9256, "total_votes": 18947, "percent_yes": 51.1479, "percent_no": 48.8521, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.199055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.034254", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade local schools in Yucaipa and Calimesa, and protect quality education with funding under local control, shall Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School District: Upgrade computers/instructional technology to support math, science, reading, writing; Add/upgrade career education and vocational classrooms, labs, technology; Repair, improve or replace leaky roofs, aging/deteriorating classrooms, restrooms and school facilities to meet safety requirements; by issuing $98,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for district administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5911, "fingerprint": "2012|201200435|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200435|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "5deded26f8e68fad", "measure_id": "201200435", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade deteriorating schools and improve education for all local high school students by retaining excellent teachers, keeping schools safe, repairing restrooms, leaky roofs, heating, cooling and fire safety systems, removing asbestos, upgrading handicapped accesibility, science/computer labs, school sites, libraries, technology, and constructing facilities, acquiring classrooms, sites/equipment, shall Chaffey Joint Union High School District issue $848,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring annual independent audits, Citizens' Oversight, with no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, keeping all funds local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 70026, "no_votes": 40070, "total_votes": 110096, "percent_yes": 63.6045, "percent_no": 36.3955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.196446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.032968", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade deteriorating schools and improve education for all local high school students by retaining excellent teachers, keeping schools safe, repairing restrooms, leaky roofs, heating, cooling and fire safety systems, removing asbestos, upgrading handicapped accesibility, science/computer labs, school sites, libraries, technology, and constructing facilities, acquiring classrooms, sites/equipment, shall Chaffey Joint Union High School District issue $848,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring annual independent audits, Citizens' Oversight, with no money for administrators' salaries/pensions, keeping all funds local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5915, "fingerprint": "2012|201200044|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200044|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "29ce1e27c6f864fb", "measure_id": "201200044", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter of the County of San Bernardino be amended to enact a permanent cap on compensation and mandatory transparency for members of the County Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 344226, "no_votes": 167369, "total_votes": 511595, "percent_yes": 67.28490000000001, "percent_no": 32.71509999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.197716", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.033699", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the County of San Bernardino be amended to enact a permanent cap on compensation and mandatory transparency for members of the County Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5916, "fingerprint": "2012|201200045|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200045|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "569383b6c12e5fc9", "measure_id": "201200045", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County Charter be amended to change the elected office of County Supervisor to a part-time position, eliminate the current Charter provisions relating to salaries of all elected County officials, establish monthly compensation for the office of County Supervisor at $5,000 plus cola not to exceed 5% annually, establish a total annual budget for each County Supervisor at five times the Supervisor\u2019s compensation, and redefine retirement benefits for the position of County Supervisor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 326939, "no_votes": 181907, "total_votes": 508846, "percent_yes": 64.25110000000001, "percent_no": 35.74889999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.198152", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.033878", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County Charter be amended to change the elected office of County Supervisor to a part-time position, eliminate the current Charter provisions relating to salaries of all elected County officials, establish monthly compensation for the office of County Supervisor at $5,000 plus cola not to exceed 5% annually, establish a total annual budget for each County Supervisor at five times the Supervisor\u2019s compensation, and redefine retirement benefits for the position of County Supervisor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5912, "fingerprint": "2012|201200236|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200236|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "cd2c5f3d0391f84a", "measure_id": "201200236", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to provide funding for essential City services such as police, fire, emergency response, stret maintenance, pothole repair, parks, libraries and youth and senior programs, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax at a rate of up to 10% of gross receipts on marijuana businesses in Needles, subject to existing independent financial audits, with all revenue controlled by the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 962, "no_votes": 224, "total_votes": 1186, "percent_yes": 81.113, "percent_no": 18.887, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.196828", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.033148", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide funding for essential City services such as police, fire, emergency response, stret maintenance, pothole repair, parks, libraries and youth and senior programs, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax at a rate of up to 10% of gross receipts on marijuana businesses in Needles, subject to existing independent financial audits, with all revenue controlled by the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5913, "fingerprint": "2012|201200237|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200237|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a8ba71b2016259db", "measure_id": "201200237", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Needles eliminate 2.5% of the current 7.5% franchise fee that the City of Needles charges the Needles Public Utility Authority and in its place establish a utility user tax of up to 2.5% to be applied to electric, water and sewer use charges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 599, "no_votes": 561, "total_votes": 1160, "percent_yes": 51.6379, "percent_no": 48.3621, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.197137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.033330", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Needles eliminate 2.5% of the current 7.5% franchise fee that the City of Needles charges the Needles Public Utility Authority and in its place establish a utility user tax of up to 2.5% to be applied to electric, water and sewer use charges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5919, "fingerprint": "2012|201200239|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200239|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "0fab690f55bc9bd2", "measure_id": "201200239", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect local property values and presrve our small town atmosphere by funding local community services such as: reducing the cost for property owners to connect to the sewer system; maintaining 9-1-1 response/neighborhood police patrols; maintaining neighborhood streets; and, other town services; Shall the Town of Yucca Valley enact a 1 cent sales tax for thirty years, with all funds for Yucca Valley only, requiring independent taxpayer oversight, annual audits, and funds protected by law from Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9843, "no_votes": 10997, "total_votes": 20840, "percent_yes": 47.2313, "percent_no": 52.7687, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.199363", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.034438", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect local property values and presrve our small town atmosphere by funding local community services such as: reducing the cost for property owners to connect to the sewer system; maintaining 9-1-1 response/neighborhood police patrols; maintaining neighborhood streets; and, other town services; Shall the Town of Yucca Valley enact a 1 cent sales tax for thirty years, with all funds for Yucca Valley only, requiring independent taxpayer oversight, annual audits, and funds protected by law from Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5914, "fingerprint": "2012|201200238|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200238|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4745a2e4924be66d", "measure_id": "201200238", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance to Increase the Business License Tax on Businesses Engaged in the Manufacture, Piping, Refining, Storage and Wholesale Distribution of Petroleum Products be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3354, "no_votes": 3594, "total_votes": 6948, "percent_yes": 48.2729, "percent_no": 51.7271, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.197425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.033516", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance to Increase the Business License Tax on Businesses Engaged in the Manufacture, Piping, Refining, Storage and Wholesale Distribution of Petroleum Products be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5942, "fingerprint": "2012|201200450|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200450|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7369a3f1af138c0e", "measure_id": "201200450", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe, modern schools and prepare students for success in college and careers by repairing and upgrading outdated classrooms and schools, constructing and upgrading school facilities, including classrooms, science labs, and libraries, improving safety and security, and supporting career training and math, science, and technology instruction with 21st Century instructional technology and facilities, shall San Dieguito Union High School District issue $449 million in bonds with independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43627, "no_votes": 34947, "total_votes": 78574, "percent_yes": 55.523500000000006, "percent_no": 44.476499999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.208660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.040371", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe, modern schools and prepare students for success in college and careers by repairing and upgrading outdated classrooms and schools, constructing and upgrading school facilities, including classrooms, science labs, and libraries, improving safety and security, and supporting career training and math, science, and technology instruction with 21st Century instructional technology and facilities, shall San Dieguito Union High School District issue $449 million in bonds with independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11426, "fingerprint": "2012|201200247|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200247|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "db11ded1b3531c62", "measure_id": "201200247", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Chula Vista Charter be amended so that City Councilmembers are elected by geographic district where they reside, with district boundaries drawn by a citizens\u2019 commission, with elections in which only district residents can vote, starting in 2016 and phased-in completely by 2018; and so that City Councilmembers, the Mayor and the City Attorney are all elected at mandatory November \u201crunoff\u201d elections starting 2014?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44906, "no_votes": 26718, "total_votes": 71624, "percent_yes": 62.6969, "percent_no": 37.3031, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.052495", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.202842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.036641", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Chula Vista Charter be amended so that City Councilmembers are elected by geographic district where they reside, with district boundaries drawn by a citizens\u2019 commission, with elections in which only district residents can vote, starting in 2016 and phased-in completely by 2018; and so that City Councilmembers, the Mayor and the City Attorney are all elected at mandatory November \u201crunoff\u201d elections starting 2014?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5926, "fingerprint": "2012|201200244|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200244|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6d96fb4066fee80e", "measure_id": "201200244", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to: direct City negotiations to seek limits on a City employee's compensation used to calculate pension benefits; eliminate defined benefit pensions for all new City Officials and employees, except police offices, substituting a defined contribution 401 (k)-type plan; require substantially equal pension contributions from the City and employees; and eliminate, if permissible, a vote of employees or refrees to change their benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 154216, "no_votes": 80126, "total_votes": 234342, "percent_yes": 65.8081, "percent_no": 34.191900000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.201348", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.035732", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to: direct City negotiations to seek limits on a City employee's compensation used to calculate pension benefits; eliminate defined benefit pensions for all new City Officials and employees, except police offices, substituting a defined contribution 401 (k)-type plan; require substantially equal pension contributions from the City and employees; and eliminate, if permissible, a vote of employees or refrees to change their benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5928, "fingerprint": "2012|201200440|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200440|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6a2669464063ae64", "measure_id": "201200440", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall a new unified school district be formed from the existing Bonsall Union School District and that portion of the Fallbrook Union High School District located within the boundaries of the Bonsall Union School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10574, "no_votes": 9439, "total_votes": 20013, "percent_yes": 52.8357, "percent_no": 47.1643, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.201884", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.036096", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a new unified school district be formed from the existing Bonsall Union School District and that portion of the Fallbrook Union High School District located within the boundaries of the Bonsall Union School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11424, "fingerprint": "2012|201200441|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200441|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ea0f06dcf02af30d", "measure_id": "201200441", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student computer/technology access; continue renovating, repairing, equipping and constructing elementary classrooms/school facilities; improve energy efficiency; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $88,400,000 of Cajon Valley Union School District bonds, previously approved by voters in February 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29048, "no_votes": 20834, "total_votes": 49882, "percent_yes": 58.2334, "percent_no": 41.7666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.052122", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.202155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.036277", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student computer/technology access; continue renovating, repairing, equipping and constructing elementary classrooms/school facilities; improve energy efficiency; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $88,400,000 of Cajon Valley Union School District bonds, previously approved by voters in February 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5921, "fingerprint": "2012|201200240|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200240|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6a3c5b42f3856eb5", "measure_id": "201200240", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Chula Vista be amended to limit the authority and compensation of the elected City Attorney, to establish term limits for the City attorney, and to authorize the City Council to establish the office of Legislative Counsel to advise the City Council on its legislative duties and on conflict of interest issues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14856, "no_votes": 12941, "total_votes": 27797, "percent_yes": 53.4446, "percent_no": 46.5554, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.199992", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.034810", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Chula Vista be amended to limit the authority and compensation of the elected City Attorney, to establish term limits for the City attorney, and to authorize the City Council to establish the office of Legislative Counsel to advise the City Council on its legislative duties and on conflict of interest issues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5930, "fingerprint": "2012|201200444|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200444|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1c41b157b5036350", "measure_id": "201200444", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education, provide safe and modern schools and create budget savings, shall Del Mar Union School District fix leaky roofs and worn-out floors; improve instructional technology and classroom computer systems; provide accessible classrooms for students with disabilities; and upgrade aging classrooms, libraries and school buildings by issuing $76.8 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for District administration, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9699, "no_votes": 8170, "total_votes": 17869, "percent_yes": 54.278400000000005, "percent_no": 45.721599999999995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.204552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.037780", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education, provide safe and modern schools and create budget savings, shall Del Mar Union School District fix leaky roofs and worn-out floors; improve instructional technology and classroom computer systems; provide accessible classrooms for students with disabilities; and upgrade aging classrooms, libraries and school buildings by issuing $76.8 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for District administration, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11429, "fingerprint": "2012|201200443|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200443|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "11444ab9c096facf", "measure_id": "201200443", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student computer/technology access; repair, equip and construct classrooms/science lab/library/school facilities; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $3,000,000 of Dehesa School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2010, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 562, "no_votes": 443, "total_votes": 1005, "percent_yes": 55.9204, "percent_no": 44.0796, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.053050", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.203670", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.037210", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student computer/technology access; repair, equip and construct classrooms/science lab/library/school facilities; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $3,000,000 of Dehesa School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2010, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5922, "fingerprint": "2012|201200241|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200241|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3c34e9045294f623", "measure_id": "201200241", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of El Cajon be changed from a general law city to a charter city through the adoption of the charter proposed by Resolution No. 22-12 of the El Cajon City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6818, "no_votes": 4898, "total_votes": 11716, "percent_yes": 58.1939, "percent_no": 41.8061, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.200264", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.034993", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of El Cajon be changed from a general law city to a charter city through the adoption of the charter proposed by Resolution No. 22-12 of the El Cajon City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11427, "fingerprint": "2012|201200442|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200442|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4bd55ad61d5193af", "measure_id": "201200442", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, renovate, construct, and upgrade classrooms and school facilities; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace temporary classrooms; upgrade heating systems; and make energy cost-saving improvements, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Chula Vista Elementary School District be authorized to issue $90 million of bonds with legal interest rates, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36265, "no_votes": 16434, "total_votes": 52699, "percent_yes": 68.81530000000001, "percent_no": 31.184699999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.052680", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.203123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.036832", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, renovate, construct, and upgrade classrooms and school facilities; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace temporary classrooms; upgrade heating systems; and make energy cost-saving improvements, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Chula Vista Elementary School District be authorized to issue $90 million of bonds with legal interest rates, annual audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight, and all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5924, "fingerprint": "2012|201200242|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200242|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b98a6e97df941a15", "measure_id": "201200242", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 11-OR0427-1, adding Section 16B16(e) to the Oceanside City Code for the purpose of implementing vacancy decontrol allowing space rents to increase following the sale or conveyance of a manufactured home, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10495, "no_votes": 19337, "total_votes": 29832, "percent_yes": 35.180299999999995, "percent_no": 64.81970000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.200810", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.035363", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 11-OR0427-1, adding Section 16B16(e) to the Oceanside City Code for the purpose of implementing vacancy decontrol allowing space rents to increase following the sale or conveyance of a manufactured home, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5939, "fingerprint": "2012|201200446|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200446|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "557baf16ac3d39e3", "measure_id": "201200446", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare students for universities/jobs/careers by: Expanding science labs, health-related careers, bio-technology, nursing, and technical job training, Upgrading electrical systems, wiring, computer technology/Internet access, Improving support facilities for war Veterans, Addressing handicap accessibility requirements, Acquiring, constructing, repairing facilities, sites and equipment, shall MiraCosta Community College District issue $497,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring all funds remain local, financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and NO money for pensions or administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80929, "no_votes": 66654, "total_votes": 147583, "percent_yes": 54.8363, "percent_no": 45.1637, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.207436", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.039610", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare students for universities/jobs/careers by: Expanding science labs, health-related careers, bio-technology, nursing, and technical job training, Upgrading electrical systems, wiring, computer technology/Internet access, Improving support facilities for war Veterans, Addressing handicap accessibility requirements, Acquiring, constructing, repairing facilities, sites and equipment, shall MiraCosta Community College District issue $497,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring all funds remain local, financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, and NO money for pensions or administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11428, "fingerprint": "2012|201200248|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200248|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1acd6866b63c7f90", "measure_id": "201200248", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance Amending Coronado\u2019s Municipal Code to Increase the City\u2019s Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) from Eight to Ten Percent be Adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4824, "no_votes": 3200, "total_votes": 8024, "percent_yes": 60.1196, "percent_no": 39.8804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.052866", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.203403", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.037022", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance Amending Coronado\u2019s Municipal Code to Increase the City\u2019s Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) from Eight to Ten Percent be Adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5925, "fingerprint": "2012|201200243|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200243|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "198ec1d10e85dfe9", "measure_id": "201200243", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed amendment to the Charter of the City of Oceanside, to establish numbered, elected at-large seats; establish a June first-round election, and a November runoff election for any June election where no candidate receives over 50% for all elected offices, effective for the June 2014 election; establish a first-round election and runoff election if no candidate receives over 50% for any special election to fill a vacancy or recall election, effective upon passage, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12546, "no_votes": 16600, "total_votes": 29146, "percent_yes": 43.0454, "percent_no": 56.9546, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.201080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.035550", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed amendment to the Charter of the City of Oceanside, to establish numbered, elected at-large seats; establish a June first-round election, and a November runoff election for any June election where no candidate receives over 50% for all elected offices, effective for the June 2014 election; establish a first-round election and runoff election if no candidate receives over 50% for any special election to fill a vacancy or recall election, effective upon passage, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11432, "fingerprint": "2012|201200447|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200447|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ef7dafa5624b0010", "measure_id": "201200447", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local schools (Campo, Clover Flat, Descanso, Jacumba, Pine Valley, Potrero and Mountain Empire High School) by upgrading classrooms/science labs/school facilities; improving student safety and accessibility for disabled students; providing computers/instructional technology; and renovating, constructing and equipping schools, shall Mountain Empire Unified School District issue $30.8 million in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2037, "no_votes": 2455, "total_votes": 4492, "percent_yes": 45.3473, "percent_no": 54.6527, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.055690", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.207732", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.039805", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local schools (Campo, Clover Flat, Descanso, Jacumba, Pine Valley, Potrero and Mountain Empire High School) by upgrading classrooms/science labs/school facilities; improving student safety and accessibility for disabled students; providing computers/instructional technology; and renovating, constructing and equipping schools, shall Mountain Empire Unified School District issue $30.8 million in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5923, "fingerprint": "2012|201200439|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200439|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "21d58fbdb7335e6b", "measure_id": "201200439", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect academic instruction and retain qualified teachers at Mountain Empire High School, Campo, Clover Flat, Descanso, Jacumba, Pine Valley and Potrero schools with funding Sacramento cannot take away, shall Mountain Empire Unified School District upgrade/construct classrooms/science labs/facilities; make schools accessible for students with disabilities; improve student safety; and update computers/technology, by issuing $30.8 million in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight and no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1352, "no_votes": 1137, "total_votes": 2489, "percent_yes": 54.319, "percent_no": 45.681, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.200537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.035178", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect academic instruction and retain qualified teachers at Mountain Empire High School, Campo, Clover Flat, Descanso, Jacumba, Pine Valley and Potrero schools with funding Sacramento cannot take away, shall Mountain Empire Unified School District upgrade/construct classrooms/science labs/facilities; make schools accessible for students with disabilities; improve student safety; and update computers/technology, by issuing $30.8 million in bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight and no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11430, "fingerprint": "2012|201200249|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200249|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "dfea1f314cf9f7b0", "measure_id": "201200249", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance which proposes the regulation of medical marijuana compassionate use dispensaries and alters the City\u2019s sales tax laws be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1124, "no_votes": 1430, "total_votes": 2554, "percent_yes": 44.0094, "percent_no": 55.9906, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.053240", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.203947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.037397", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance which proposes the regulation of medical marijuana compassionate use dispensaries and alters the City\u2019s sales tax laws be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5920, "fingerprint": "2012|201200438|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200438|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6574dfc088dad360", "measure_id": "201200438", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect student safety and quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall the Alpine Union Elementary School District upgrade, construct, equip, acquire classrooms, sites, school facilities to meet current earthquake and safety codes, update instructional technology, support core academic programs/teachers by eliminating debt, make classrooms accessible for students with disabilities by issuing $11,995,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds spent on Alpine area schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1933, "no_votes": 2592, "total_votes": 4525, "percent_yes": 42.7182, "percent_no": 57.2818, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.199639", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.034625", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect student safety and quality education with funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall the Alpine Union Elementary School District upgrade, construct, equip, acquire classrooms, sites, school facilities to meet current earthquake and safety codes, update instructional technology, support core academic programs/teachers by eliminating debt, make classrooms accessible for students with disabilities by issuing $11,995,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds spent on Alpine area schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5929, "fingerprint": "2012|201200250|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200250|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "af06be85ea1795b9", "measure_id": "201200250", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 869 approving the Village Specific Plan as approved by the Del Mar City Council, which, without raising taxes, implements the Del Mar Community Plan by:\r\ncreating a pedestrian-oriented downtown with plazas, wider sidewalks and landscaping; improving the Village\u2019s appearance and economic viability; increasing public parking availability; improving traffic flow, bike and pedestrian safety; reducing air and water pollution; and providing development controls, and traffic and parking solutions to ensure neighborhood compatibility, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1135, "no_votes": 1549, "total_votes": 2684, "percent_yes": 42.2876, "percent_no": 57.7124, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.204225", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.037586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 869 approving the Village Specific Plan as approved by the Del Mar City Council, which, without raising taxes, implements the Del Mar Community Plan by:\r\ncreating a pedestrian-oriented downtown with plazas, wider sidewalks and landscaping; improving the Village\u2019s appearance and economic viability; increasing public parking availability; improving traffic flow, bike and pedestrian safety; reducing air and water pollution; and providing development controls, and traffic and parking solutions to ensure neighborhood compatibility, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5931, "fingerprint": "2012|201200251|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200251|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ceb690dc99a8c01d", "measure_id": "201200251", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors of the City of Encinitas elect a mayor and four city council members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15546, "no_votes": 12331, "total_votes": 27877, "percent_yes": 55.7664, "percent_no": 44.2336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.204824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.037962", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors of the City of Encinitas elect a mayor and four city council members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5932, "fingerprint": "2012|201200252|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200252|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "51bc78433c3b3a90", "measure_id": "201200252", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16048, "no_votes": 11934, "total_votes": 27982, "percent_yes": 57.351200000000006, "percent_no": 42.648799999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.205089", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.038141", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11431, "fingerprint": "2012|201200253|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200253|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "201200253", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7998, "no_votes": 19693, "total_votes": 27691, "percent_yes": 28.883, "percent_no": 71.117, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.054178", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.205358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.038324", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11425, "fingerprint": "2012|201200246|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200246|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "948917e24f9545b6", "measure_id": "201200246", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 502 Retention of Benefits of the Charter of Carlsbad, California be amended to include limiting increases in retirement benefits for miscellaneous employees without an amendment to this section?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32026, "no_votes": 12383, "total_votes": 44409, "percent_yes": 72.116, "percent_no": 27.884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.052310", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.202467", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.036460", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 502 Retention of Benefits of the Charter of Carlsbad, California be amended to include limiting increases in retirement benefits for miscellaneous employees without an amendment to this section?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5927, "fingerprint": "2012|201200245|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200245|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e6d10dcf9aa050b3", "measure_id": "201200245", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of San Diego be prohibited from requiring contractors to use Project Labor Agreements for City construction projects, except where required by law, and should the Mayor be required to post online all construction contracts over $25,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134724, "no_votes": 97209, "total_votes": 231933, "percent_yes": 58.087500000000006, "percent_no": 41.912499999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.201616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.035912", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of San Diego be prohibited from requiring contractors to use Project Labor Agreements for City construction projects, except where required by law, and should the Mayor be required to post online all construction contracts over $25,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5933, "fingerprint": "2012|201200254|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200254|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "21f761aeedf4463a", "measure_id": "201200254", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the changes to the City of Escondido's General Plan, approved by the City Council in resolution 2012-54(R), be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19683, "no_votes": 17198, "total_votes": 36881, "percent_yes": 53.3689, "percent_no": 46.6311, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.205623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.038505", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the changes to the City of Escondido's General Plan, approved by the City Council in resolution 2012-54(R), be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5934, "fingerprint": "2012|201200255|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200255|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ccb1beae2371fae9", "measure_id": "201200255", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shal the City of Escondido be changed from a general law city to a charter city through the adoption of the charter proposed by Resolution 2012-99(R) of the Escondido City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17568, "no_votes": 19785, "total_votes": 37353, "percent_yes": 47.0324, "percent_no": 52.9676, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.205924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.038687", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shal the City of Escondido be changed from a general law city to a charter city through the adoption of the charter proposed by Resolution 2012-99(R) of the Escondido City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5937, "fingerprint": "2012|201200257|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200257|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c77be93d1fef2fd5", "measure_id": "201200257", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Alternative Lemon Grove Medical Marijuana Regulatory Ordinance be Adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3221, "no_votes": 5154, "total_votes": 8375, "percent_yes": 38.459700000000005, "percent_no": 61.540299999999995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.206897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.039242", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Alternative Lemon Grove Medical Marijuana Regulatory Ordinance be Adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5940, "fingerprint": "2012|201200448|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200448|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d0e8455c91487ba5", "measure_id": "201200448", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; replace deteriorating portable classrooms; and improve energy efficiency; shall Ramona Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities by issuing $66,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and NO money for employee salaries and all funds spent only on Ramona schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7737, "no_votes": 7551, "total_votes": 15288, "percent_yes": 50.60829999999999, "percent_no": 49.39170000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.208034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.039996", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair/replace leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and modern technology; construct/modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; replace deteriorating portable classrooms; and improve energy efficiency; shall Ramona Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities by issuing $66,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight and NO money for employee salaries and all funds spent only on Ramona schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5936, "fingerprint": "2012|201200256|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200256|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e9faf84fcfd3cf4e", "measure_id": "201200256", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance permitting medical marijuana dispensaries of any size in any commercial, mixed use or industrial zones, setting regulations for their operation, and repealing the City\u2019s prohibition on medical marijuana dispensaries with more than three members be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2926, "no_votes": 4122, "total_votes": 7048, "percent_yes": 41.5153, "percent_no": 58.4847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.206553", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.039052", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance permitting medical marijuana dispensaries of any size in any commercial, mixed use or industrial zones, setting regulations for their operation, and repealing the City\u2019s prohibition on medical marijuana dispensaries with more than three members be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5938, "fingerprint": "2012|201200258|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200258|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "61ee1316cb57958e", "measure_id": "201200258", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Lemon Grove Marijuana Dispensary Authorization Ordinance be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3375, "no_votes": 5136, "total_votes": 8511, "percent_yes": 39.6546, "percent_no": 60.3454, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.207163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.039425", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lemon Grove Marijuana Dispensary Authorization Ordinance be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5943, "fingerprint": "2012|201200259|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200259|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "0f5f5b6bace9445f", "measure_id": "201200259", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the City\u2019s current transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10%, as applied to hotels, motels, online travel companies and campsites for stays of up to thirty days, be adopted to protect funding for general City services such as park maintenance, road repair and law enforcement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12876, "no_votes": 9776, "total_votes": 22652, "percent_yes": 56.8427, "percent_no": 43.1573, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.208936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.040554", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the City\u2019s current transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10%, as applied to hotels, motels, online travel companies and campsites for stays of up to thirty days, be adopted to protect funding for general City services such as park maintenance, road repair and law enforcement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5935, "fingerprint": "2012|201200445|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200445|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "af94fd7985946782", "measure_id": "201200445", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare local students/veterans for college/career success, shall Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District upgrade career training facilities for science, medical, public safety, in-demand fields, create a Veterans Support Center on each campus, modernize technology in classrooms, libraries, science labs, improve disabled persons access, upgrade, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, by issuing $398,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for pensions/administrators, and all money staying local, benefiting East County community colleges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95802, "no_votes": 68752, "total_votes": 164554, "percent_yes": 58.2192, "percent_no": 41.7808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.206197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.038867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare local students/veterans for college/career success, shall Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District upgrade career training facilities for science, medical, public safety, in-demand fields, create a Veterans Support Center on each campus, modernize technology in classrooms, libraries, science labs, improve disabled persons access, upgrade, construct, acquire classrooms, facilities, sites/equipment, by issuing $398,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for pensions/administrators, and all money staying local, benefiting East County community colleges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5944, "fingerprint": "2012|201200260|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200260|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "572f5c3dbbcc16fb", "measure_id": "201200260", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance amending the Solana Beach Municipal Code to allow medical marijuana dispensaries in nonresidential zones in the City of Solana Beach be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2601, "no_votes": 4232, "total_votes": 6833, "percent_yes": 38.0653, "percent_no": 61.9347, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.209205", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.040746", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance amending the Solana Beach Municipal Code to allow medical marijuana dispensaries in nonresidential zones in the City of Solana Beach be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5945, "fingerprint": "2012|201200451|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200451|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "07b10a43c2f16026", "measure_id": "201200451", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue elementary classroom/school renovations; safety improvements; computers/technology access; roof, plumbing, heating/air-conditioning repairs; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $26,000,000 of South Bay Union School District General Obligation Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not take by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14123, "no_votes": 4477, "total_votes": 18600, "percent_yes": 75.9301, "percent_no": 24.069900000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.209474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.040926", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue elementary classroom/school renovations; safety improvements; computers/technology access; roof, plumbing, heating/air-conditioning repairs; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $26,000,000 of South Bay Union School District General Obligation Bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not take by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5941, "fingerprint": "2012|201200449|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200449|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9a7c61191e7fd0b4", "measure_id": "201200449", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair neighborhood schools and charter schools with funding the state cannot take away by: Repairing deteriorating 60-year-old classrooms, libraries, wiring, plumbing, bathrooms and leaky roofs; Removing hazardous mold, asbestos, and lead; Upgrading fire safety systems/doors; Upgrading classroom instructional technology, labs and vocational education classrooms; Shall San Diego Unified School District issue $2.8 billion in bonds at legal interest rates with citizen\u2019s oversight, independent financial audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 218242, "no_votes": 134927, "total_votes": 353169, "percent_yes": 61.7953, "percent_no": 38.2047, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.208385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.040183", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair neighborhood schools and charter schools with funding the state cannot take away by: Repairing deteriorating 60-year-old classrooms, libraries, wiring, plumbing, bathrooms and leaky roofs; Removing hazardous mold, asbestos, and lead; Upgrading fire safety systems/doors; Upgrading classroom instructional technology, labs and vocational education classrooms; Shall San Diego Unified School District issue $2.8 billion in bonds at legal interest rates with citizen\u2019s oversight, independent financial audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11433, "fingerprint": "2012|201200048|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200048|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3669d592cc623890", "measure_id": "201200048", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve the safety and quality of neighborhood parks across the city and waterfront open spaces, enhance water quality and clean up environmental contamination along the Bay, replace unsafe playgrounds, fix restrooms, improve access for the disabled, and ensure the seismic safety of park and recreation facilities, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $195 million dollars in General Obligation bonds, subject to independent oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 242404, "no_votes": 93735, "total_votes": 336139, "percent_yes": 72.1142, "percent_no": 27.885800000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.057537", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.210364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.041476", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the safety and quality of neighborhood parks across the city and waterfront open spaces, enhance water quality and clean up environmental contamination along the Bay, replace unsafe playgrounds, fix restrooms, improve access for the disabled, and ensure the seismic safety of park and recreation facilities, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $195 million dollars in General Obligation bonds, subject to independent oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5946, "fingerprint": "2012|201200047|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200047|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "de72ea0e60bd3a8a", "measure_id": "201200047", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to strictly limit commercial activities and private events at Coit Tower, and to use funds from Coit Tower concession operations on the Coit Tower murals, building, and Pioneer Park?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72672, "no_votes": 63336, "total_votes": 136008, "percent_yes": 53.4322, "percent_no": 46.5678, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.209747", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.041107", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to strictly limit commercial activities and private events at Coit Tower, and to use funds from Coit Tower concession operations on the Coit Tower murals, building, and Pioneer Park?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5948, "fingerprint": "2012|201200049|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200049|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f26905b243f10322", "measure_id": "201200049", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend its Charter to: create a Housing Trust Fund that supports affordable housing for low-income and moderate-income households; and change the affordable housing requirements imposed on some private residential developments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 211674, "no_votes": 113214, "total_votes": 324888, "percent_yes": 65.1529, "percent_no": 34.8471, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.210689", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.041662", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend its Charter to: create a Housing Trust Fund that supports affordable housing for low-income and moderate-income households; and change the affordable housing requirements imposed on some private residential developments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5949, "fingerprint": "2012|201200050|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200050|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0ab146f05a56a14b", "measure_id": "201200050", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend its Charter to change the election cycle for City Attorney and Treasurer so that these officers would be elected at the same time as the Mayor, Sheriff and District Attorney?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 263642, "no_votes": 53252, "total_votes": 316894, "percent_yes": 83.1956, "percent_no": 16.8044, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.210961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.041843", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend its Charter to change the election cycle for City Attorney and Treasurer so that these officers would be elected at the same time as the Mayor, Sheriff and District Attorney?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5950, "fingerprint": "2012|201200051|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200051|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9b4b4b579de8a11e", "measure_id": "201200051", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City: create a gross receipts tax designed to eliminate or reduce the tax on payroll costs; and increase business registration fees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 223887, "no_votes": 92577, "total_votes": 316464, "percent_yes": 70.7464, "percent_no": 29.253600000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.211229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.042025", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City: create a gross receipts tax designed to eliminate or reduce the tax on payroll costs; and increase business registration fees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5951, "fingerprint": "2012|201200052|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200052|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1ad2076a944210aa", "measure_id": "201200052", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City prepare a two-phase plan that evaluates how to drain the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir so that it can be restored by the National Park Service and identifies replacement water and power sources?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 74885, "no_votes": 249304, "total_votes": 324189, "percent_yes": 23.0992, "percent_no": 76.9008, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.211495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.042210", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City prepare a two-phase plan that evaluates how to drain the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir so that it can be restored by the National Park Service and identifies replacement water and power sources?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5952, "fingerprint": "2012|201200053|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200053|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3eb0157d1e908da2", "measure_id": "201200053", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy that corporations should not have the same constitutional rights as human beings and should be subject to political spending limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 260595, "no_votes": 61181, "total_votes": 321776, "percent_yes": 80.98649999999999, "percent_no": 19.013500000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.211764", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.042391", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy that corporations should not have the same constitutional rights as human beings and should be subject to political spending limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11434, "fingerprint": "2012|201200452|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200452|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "e1e720666ecd9185", "measure_id": "201200452", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide City College of San Francisco with funds that State cannot take away; offset budget cuts; prevent layoffs; provide an affordable, quality education for students; maintain essential courses, including but not limited to writing, math, science, and other gneral education;prepare students for four-year universities; provide workforce training including, but not limited to nursing, engineering, technology, and business; and keep college libraries, student support services, and other instructional support open and up-to-date; shall the San Francisco Community College District levy 79 dollars per parcel annually for eight years requiring independent audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 242410, "no_votes": 90134, "total_votes": 332544, "percent_yes": 72.8956, "percent_no": 27.1044, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.058958", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.212056", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.042574", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide City College of San Francisco with funds that State cannot take away; offset budget cuts; prevent layoffs; provide an affordable, quality education for students; maintain essential courses, including but not limited to writing, math, science, and other gneral education;prepare students for four-year universities; provide workforce training including, but not limited to nursing, engineering, technology, and business; and keep college libraries, student support services, and other instructional support open and up-to-date; shall the San Francisco Community College District levy 79 dollars per parcel annually for eight years requiring independent audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5947, "fingerprint": "2012|201200046|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200046|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "75744ed98a73c740", "measure_id": "201200046", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City use a competitive bidding process to award five separate agreements for trash and recycling services; require that garbage processing and transfer facilities be owned by the City and located in San Francisco; require the Board of Supervisors to approve maximum rates for garbage services; and allow the Board of Supervisors to make future amendments that advance the purposes of this ordinance without further voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 106848, "no_votes": 32697, "total_votes": 139545, "percent_yes": 76.56880000000001, "percent_no": 23.43119999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.210021", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.041289", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City use a competitive bidding process to award five separate agreements for trash and recycling services; require that garbage processing and transfer facilities be owned by the City and located in San Francisco; require the Board of Supervisors to approve maximum rates for garbage services; and allow the Board of Supervisors to make future amendments that advance the purposes of this ordinance without further voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5956, "fingerprint": "2012|201200054|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200054|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "ffcb1c8f151abe49", "measure_id": "201200054", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Jass Singh be recalled (removed) from the Mountain House CSD Board of Directors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1654, "no_votes": 1111, "total_votes": 2765, "percent_yes": 59.8192, "percent_no": 40.1808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.213251", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.043320", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jass Singh be recalled (removed) from the Mountain House CSD Board of Directors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5954, "fingerprint": "2012|201200454|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200454|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "89b7902907b0632c", "measure_id": "201200454", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct and modernize classrooms and support facilities at school sites, including upgrading vocational facilities to better prepare students for the workforce, increasing access to modern classroom technology, and reducing annual lease payments and operating costs to put more money in the classroom, shall the Escalon Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $19,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits and an independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3279, "no_votes": 1836, "total_votes": 5115, "percent_yes": 64.1056, "percent_no": 35.894400000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.212664", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.042945", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct and modernize classrooms and support facilities at school sites, including upgrading vocational facilities to better prepare students for the workforce, increasing access to modern classroom technology, and reducing annual lease payments and operating costs to put more money in the classroom, shall the Escalon Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $19,500,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits and an independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5955, "fingerprint": "2012|201200261|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200261|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "ece6de4311efa587", "measure_id": "201200261", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the City\u2019s long-term financial stability and maintain City and public safety services, including police patrols and fire protection; 9-1-1 emergency response; rapid response to gang violence, robberies and burglaries; park safety; youth/senior services; job creation and other city services, shall the City of Lathrop enact a 1\u00a2 sales tax with all money for Lathrop and no money for Sacramento, requiring independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight and published annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3489, "no_votes": 1011, "total_votes": 4500, "percent_yes": 77.53330000000001, "percent_no": 22.46669999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.212979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.043132", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the City\u2019s long-term financial stability and maintain City and public safety services, including police patrols and fire protection; 9-1-1 emergency response; rapid response to gang violence, robberies and burglaries; park safety; youth/senior services; job creation and other city services, shall the City of Lathrop enact a 1\u00a2 sales tax with all money for Lathrop and no money for Sacramento, requiring independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight and published annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5958, "fingerprint": "2012|201200055|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200055|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "53356ea6133b5c90", "measure_id": "201200055", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that limits the number of terms a person may serve on the Board of Supervisors and Board of Education to three (3) terms of office during his or her lifetime?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78399, "no_votes": 109477, "total_votes": 187876, "percent_yes": 41.7291, "percent_no": 58.2709, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.213851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.044082", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that limits the number of terms a person may serve on the Board of Supervisors and Board of Education to three (3) terms of office during his or her lifetime?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5959, "fingerprint": "2012|201200456|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200456|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "8d5ccb731415ffc7", "measure_id": "201200456", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to repair, equip, acquire and construct classrooms, school facilities, playgrounds and athletic fields; replace portables with permanent classrooms; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $156,000,000 of Stockton Unified School District bonds, approved by voters in February 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31228, "no_votes": 10726, "total_votes": 41954, "percent_yes": 74.4339, "percent_no": 25.566100000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.214131", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.044354", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to repair, equip, acquire and construct classrooms, school facilities, playgrounds and athletic fields; replace portables with permanent classrooms; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $156,000,000 of Stockton Unified School District bonds, approved by voters in February 2008, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5957, "fingerprint": "2012|201200455|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200455|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "24140cafb11c3355", "measure_id": "201200455", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace outdated portable facilities with new permanent classrooms to reduce annual maintenance and repair costs, construct libraries and science labs, modernize support facilities, improve student safety, reduce operating costs and increase energy efficiency, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Ripon Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $ 25,236,190 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4264, "no_votes": 3131, "total_votes": 7395, "percent_yes": 57.6606, "percent_no": 42.3394, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.213523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.043626", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace outdated portable facilities with new permanent classrooms to reduce annual maintenance and repair costs, construct libraries and science labs, modernize support facilities, improve student safety, reduce operating costs and increase energy efficiency, and provide the local match for State grants, shall the Ripon Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $ 25,236,190 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5953, "fingerprint": "2012|201200453|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200453|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "8a5c23966dcc02bf", "measure_id": "201200453", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and technology; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and facilities; make facility improvements to increase energy efficiency; replace old heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall the Lincoln Unified School District issue $48,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5653, "no_votes": 3835, "total_votes": 9488, "percent_yes": 59.5805, "percent_no": 40.4195, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.212341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.042757", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair leaky roofs; increase student access to computers and technology; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and facilities; make facility improvements to increase energy efficiency; replace old heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall the Lincoln Unified School District issue $48,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5960, "fingerprint": "2012|201200262|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200262|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "a88b1ea5bd22456d", "measure_id": "201200262", "measure_letter": "A-12", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arroyo Grande fund construction of a new Police Station and refinance the 2003 Fire Station bonds by issuing 20-year bonds no to exceed $6,700,000 provided that the tax rate is maintained at or below the existing tax rate for the Fire Station bonds and a portion of the bond payments will be paid by revenues from the 2006 Local Sales Tax Measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 803, "no_votes": 554, "total_votes": 1357, "percent_yes": 59.1746, "percent_no": 40.8254, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.214435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.044623", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arroyo Grande fund construction of a new Police Station and refinance the 2003 Fire Station bonds by issuing 20-year bonds no to exceed $6,700,000 provided that the tax rate is maintained at or below the existing tax rate for the Fire Station bonds and a portion of the bond payments will be paid by revenues from the 2006 Local Sales Tax Measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5965, "fingerprint": "2012|201200056|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200056|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "677845f96fcf532a", "measure_id": "201200056", "measure_letter": "B-12", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Must an election be held prior to any permanent sale of water to any entity outside the Oceano Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1787, "no_votes": 340, "total_votes": 2127, "percent_yes": 84.015, "percent_no": 15.985, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.215829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.045897", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Must an election be held prior to any permanent sale of water to any entity outside the Oceano Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5966, "fingerprint": "2012|201200267|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200267|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "8382c72ec84cb223", "measure_id": "201200267", "measure_letter": "D-12", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would 1) reduce the City of San Luis Obispo's current Utility Users Tax on telecommunication and video services from 5% to 4.8%; 2) clarify the scope and application of the tax to all taxable utilities; and 3) modernize the method of calculating and collecting the tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law so that all taxpayers are treated equally regardless of technology used?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14347, "no_votes": 2808, "total_votes": 17155, "percent_yes": 83.63159999999999, "percent_no": 16.36840000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.216096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.046162", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would 1) reduce the City of San Luis Obispo's current Utility Users Tax on telecommunication and video services from 5% to 4.8%; 2) clarify the scope and application of the tax to all taxable utilities; and 3) modernize the method of calculating and collecting the tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law so that all taxpayers are treated equally regardless of technology used?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5961, "fingerprint": "2012|201200264|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200264|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "b2673dc5e78b83b0", "measure_id": "201200264", "measure_letter": "E-12", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding that cannot be seized by the State, but will stay in Paso Robles for such things as street repair, maintenance, and improvement, and other vital city needs, shall the City of Paso Robles enact a temporary one half of one percent sales tax which will expire in 12 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6706, "no_votes": 4645, "total_votes": 11351, "percent_yes": 59.0785, "percent_no": 40.9215, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.214762", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.044878", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding that cannot be seized by the State, but will stay in Paso Robles for such things as street repair, maintenance, and improvement, and other vital city needs, shall the City of Paso Robles enact a temporary one half of one percent sales tax which will expire in 12 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5962, "fingerprint": "2012|201200263|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200263|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "60321d393e653e63", "measure_id": "201200263", "measure_letter": "F-12", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the voters approve a one half of one percent City limited term general sales tax increase, shall the additional revenues be used primarily for the purpose of repairing and maintaining the City's roadways?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7805, "no_votes": 3228, "total_votes": 11033, "percent_yes": 70.7423, "percent_no": 29.2577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.215031", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.045135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the voters approve a one half of one percent City limited term general sales tax increase, shall the additional revenues be used primarily for the purpose of repairing and maintaining the City's roadways?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5963, "fingerprint": "2012|201200265|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200265|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "201200265", "measure_letter": "G-12", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6438, "no_votes": 4646, "total_votes": 11084, "percent_yes": 58.08370000000001, "percent_no": 41.91629999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.215298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.045383", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5967, "fingerprint": "2012|201200457|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200457|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "5a89ef39335a7cfa", "measure_id": "201200457", "measure_letter": "H-12", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To update classrooms with modern computers/technology; replace portable classrooms; expand vocational education facilities including welding, engineering, medical/science technology, and construction trades; and renovate, upgrade, equip, acquire and construct classrooms/school facilities throughout the District; shall Templeton Unified School District be authorized to issue $35,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, an independent citizen oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3017, "no_votes": 2196, "total_votes": 5213, "percent_yes": 57.8745, "percent_no": 42.1255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.216404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.046424", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To update classrooms with modern computers/technology; replace portable classrooms; expand vocational education facilities including welding, engineering, medical/science technology, and construction trades; and renovate, upgrade, equip, acquire and construct classrooms/school facilities throughout the District; shall Templeton Unified School District be authorized to issue $35,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below legal limits, an independent citizen oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5964, "fingerprint": "2012|201200266|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200266|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "7fd6160dae91a2e1", "measure_id": "201200266", "measure_letter": "I-12", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Grover Beach be changed from a general law city to a charter city through the adoption of the charter proposed by Resolution No. 12-42 of the Grover Beach City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2237, "no_votes": 2241, "total_votes": 4478, "percent_yes": 49.9553, "percent_no": 50.0447, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.215561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.045638", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Grover Beach be changed from a general law city to a charter city through the adoption of the charter proposed by Resolution No. 12-42 of the Grover Beach City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5986, "fingerprint": "2012|201200061|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200061|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d4012cc7e1caa345", "measure_id": "201200061", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the San Mateo County Charter be amended so that each member of the Board of Supervisors will cease to be elected by an at-large vote of all the voters in the County, but is instead elected only by the voters of his or her district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 142374, "no_votes": 100114, "total_votes": 242488, "percent_yes": 58.713800000000006, "percent_no": 41.286199999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.222311", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.050671", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Mateo County Charter be amended so that each member of the Board of Supervisors will cease to be elected by an at-large vote of all the voters in the County, but is instead elected only by the voters of his or her district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5987, "fingerprint": "2012|201200062|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200062|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8c11a7ff386453fe", "measure_id": "201200062", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the San Mateo County Charter be amended to change the elected position of Controller to an appointed position?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 96449, "no_votes": 140390, "total_votes": 236839, "percent_yes": 40.7234, "percent_no": 59.2766, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.222580", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.050856", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Mateo County Charter be amended to change the elected position of Controller to an appointed position?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5980, "fingerprint": "2012|201200463|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200463|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "76c8d7e1b23e88c3", "measure_id": "201200463", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent local schools by modernizing scienc labs, upgrading instructional technology/computers, adding classrooms/reopening an existing school to reduce current overcrowding, upgrading classrooms to meet current safety codes, renovating heating and electrical systems to save money, shall Burlingame Elementary School District issue $56,000,000 of bonds that cannot be taken by the State, at legal rates, to renovate, construct, acquire local neighborhood schools, sites, equipment and facilities, with independent audits, citizen's oversight, and no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8609, "no_votes": 4145, "total_votes": 12754, "percent_yes": 67.5004, "percent_no": 32.4996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.220180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.049365", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent local schools by modernizing scienc labs, upgrading instructional technology/computers, adding classrooms/reopening an existing school to reduce current overcrowding, upgrading classrooms to meet current safety codes, renovating heating and electrical systems to save money, shall Burlingame Elementary School District issue $56,000,000 of bonds that cannot be taken by the State, at legal rates, to renovate, construct, acquire local neighborhood schools, sites, equipment and facilities, with independent audits, citizen's oversight, and no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5982, "fingerprint": "2012|201200465|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200465|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4d9ffd7f4fcb06cb", "measure_id": "201200465", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue renovating, equipping and constructing classrooms/school facilities including Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton and Westmoor High Schools and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $41,900,000 of Jefferson Union High School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30757, "no_votes": 10644, "total_votes": 41401, "percent_yes": 74.29050000000001, "percent_no": 25.70949999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.221115", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.049929", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue renovating, equipping and constructing classrooms/school facilities including Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton and Westmoor High Schools and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $41,900,000 of Jefferson Union High School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5977, "fingerprint": "2012|201200268|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200268|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d204167bfe4f07c2", "measure_id": "201200268", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Town of Atherton construct a new library in Holbrook-Palmer Park using funds dedicated for Library purposes only, by replacing the Main House and some surrounding patios and walkways?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1209, "no_votes": 2651, "total_votes": 3860, "percent_yes": 31.3212, "percent_no": 68.6788, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.219344", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.048823", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Town of Atherton construct a new library in Holbrook-Palmer Park using funds dedicated for Library purposes only, by replacing the Main House and some surrounding patios and walkways?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5984, "fingerprint": "2012|201200466|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200466|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "65265200c361cb98", "measure_id": "201200466", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce the impact of State funding cuts to our public schools; provide local funding the State cannot take away; sustain our high quality neighborhood schools; reduce combiatino classes' attract and retain highly qualified teachers; reduce cost of special education; and fund curriculum modernization; shall the San Bruno Park School District levy an educational parcel tax of $199 per parcel annually for five years, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrator salaries, and an exemption for seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7661, "no_votes": 5282, "total_votes": 12943, "percent_yes": 59.19029999999999, "percent_no": 40.80970000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.221741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.050299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce the impact of State funding cuts to our public schools; provide local funding the State cannot take away; sustain our high quality neighborhood schools; reduce combiatino classes' attract and retain highly qualified teachers; reduce cost of special education; and fund curriculum modernization; shall the San Bruno Park School District levy an educational parcel tax of $199 per parcel annually for five years, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrator salaries, and an exemption for seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5985, "fingerprint": "2012|201200467|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200467|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7c279afcdc2c321a", "measure_id": "201200467", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve, repair and equip San Carlose elementary and middle school facilities, including upgrading science and computer labs, libraries, classrooms and schools, adding classrooms and schools on existing sites to reduce overcrowding, renovating schools to meet health and safety standards, providing computers and other instructional technology equipment and infrastructure, and improving energy efficiency, shall San Carlos School District issue $72 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits and all funds used for San Carlos school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9534, "no_votes": 4489, "total_votes": 14023, "percent_yes": 67.9883, "percent_no": 32.011700000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.222042", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.050485", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve, repair and equip San Carlose elementary and middle school facilities, including upgrading science and computer labs, libraries, classrooms and schools, adding classrooms and schools on existing sites to reduce overcrowding, renovating schools to meet health and safety standards, providing computers and other instructional technology equipment and infrastructure, and improving energy efficiency, shall San Carlos School District issue $72 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits and all funds used for San Carlos school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5981, "fingerprint": "2012|201200271|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200271|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "af378b540d4e2e24", "measure_id": "201200271", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding only for the City of Half Moon Bay that can be used to enhance our Library, increase street maintenance, improve senior services, invest in business development and tourism, improve Smith Field recreational facilities, help fund the new Main Street bridge and improve other general city services, shall the City of Half Moon Bay pas a temporary half-cent general sales tax that will expire after 3 years, with citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2794, "no_votes": 2318, "total_votes": 5112, "percent_yes": 54.6557, "percent_no": 45.3443, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.220446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.049564", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding only for the City of Half Moon Bay that can be used to enhance our Library, increase street maintenance, improve senior services, invest in business development and tourism, improve Smith Field recreational facilities, help fund the new Main Street bridge and improve other general city services, shall the City of Half Moon Bay pas a temporary half-cent general sales tax that will expire after 3 years, with citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5983, "fingerprint": "2012|201200272|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200272|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a993c5f7d54d3e57", "measure_id": "201200272", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To partially restore the annual revenue loss of $1.2 million caused by the State's dissolution of the City's redevelopment agency, to maintain current City service levels for police, library, streets, sidewalks, storm drains, and parks and recreation facilities and programs, and to keep parity with neighboring cities' hotel tax rates, shall the City of Menlo Park adopt an ordinance to increase the transient occupancy tax on hotel guests from 10% to 12% effective January 1, 2013?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10098, "no_votes": 3496, "total_votes": 13594, "percent_yes": 74.28280000000001, "percent_no": 25.71719999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.221429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.050114", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To partially restore the annual revenue loss of $1.2 million caused by the State's dissolution of the City's redevelopment agency, to maintain current City service levels for police, library, streets, sidewalks, storm drains, and parks and recreation facilities and programs, and to keep parity with neighboring cities' hotel tax rates, shall the City of Menlo Park adopt an ordinance to increase the transient occupancy tax on hotel guests from 10% to 12% effective January 1, 2013?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5978, "fingerprint": "2012|201200269|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200269|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ced85c12bc98ef2a", "measure_id": "201200269", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Town of Atherton primarily use private donations to construct and design a new Town Center? Other funding sources might include funds derived from Building fees or future grant money, but would not use general fund or parcel tax money.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2739, "no_votes": 989, "total_votes": 3728, "percent_yes": 73.471, "percent_no": 26.528999999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.219642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.049004", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Town of Atherton primarily use private donations to construct and design a new Town Center? Other funding sources might include funds derived from Building fees or future grant money, but would not use general fund or parcel tax money.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11436, "fingerprint": "2012|201200063|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200063|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2a76b8a4d4eded33", "measure_id": "201200063", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To ensure San Mateo County quality of life by retaining critical facilities/services, such as: child abuse prevention, 911 dispatch, fire prevention, after-school, library reading/homework programs; keeping parks open; maintaining seismically safe hospital/emergency rooms which may include substantial funding to replace Seton Hospital/emergency room for low-income children/seniors/disabled; and other County services, shall San Mateo County levy a half-cent sales tax, for ten years, which the State cannot take away, with oversight/independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 169661, "no_votes": 89788, "total_votes": 259449, "percent_yes": 65.3928, "percent_no": 34.607200000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.065896", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.222852", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.051042", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure San Mateo County quality of life by retaining critical facilities/services, such as: child abuse prevention, 911 dispatch, fire prevention, after-school, library reading/homework programs; keeping parks open; maintaining seismically safe hospital/emergency rooms which may include substantial funding to replace Seton Hospital/emergency room for low-income children/seniors/disabled; and other County services, shall San Mateo County levy a half-cent sales tax, for ten years, which the State cannot take away, with oversight/independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11435, "fingerprint": "2012|201200464|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200464|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2609bf7fa1fb1e26", "measure_id": "201200464", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe, modern classrooms and local schools, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall the Jeffereson Elementary School District: repair deteriorating roofs; upgrade science labs and classroom technology; enhance fire and security systems; provide disabled student access; save money by improving energy efficiency; and acquire, construct, repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment by issuing $67,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16261, "no_votes": 4877, "total_votes": 21138, "percent_yes": 76.9278, "percent_no": 23.072199999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.064583", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.220714", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.049746", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe, modern classrooms and local schools, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall the Jeffereson Elementary School District: repair deteriorating roofs; upgrade science labs and classroom technology; enhance fire and security systems; provide disabled student access; save money by improving energy efficiency; and acquire, construct, repair classrooms, sites, facilities and equipment by issuing $67,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5979, "fingerprint": "2012|201200270|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200270|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9cb269830ff3edca", "measure_id": "201200270", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Town permit the Menlo-Atherton Little League to improve the baseball field and surrounding areas at Holbrook-Palmer Park, including covered seating for spectators, an improved playing area for children, and new restrooms for all park users, using private funds only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2901, "no_votes": 961, "total_votes": 3862, "percent_yes": 75.1165, "percent_no": 24.883499999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.219913", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.049185", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Town permit the Menlo-Atherton Little League to improve the baseball field and surrounding areas at Holbrook-Palmer Park, including covered seating for spectators, an improved playing area for children, and new restrooms for all park users, using private funds only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5968, "fingerprint": "2012|201200458|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200458|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "98a1713f16c9471f", "measure_id": "201200458", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain local control of our K-8 schools, provide funds needed to lower class sizes, protect classroom and library programs, maintain classroom computers and technology, and to hire/retain qualified teachers and staff; shall the Brisbane School District be authorized an additional qualified special tax with an annual cost of $156 beginning 7/01/2012, offering an exemption to those age 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 938, "no_votes": 452, "total_votes": 1390, "percent_yes": 67.482, "percent_no": 32.518, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.216700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.046694", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain local control of our K-8 schools, provide funds needed to lower class sizes, protect classroom and library programs, maintain classroom computers and technology, and to hire/retain qualified teachers and staff; shall the Brisbane School District be authorized an additional qualified special tax with an annual cost of $156 beginning 7/01/2012, offering an exemption to those age 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5969, "fingerprint": "2012|201200459|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200459|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0d93bd0d3d4b87f3", "measure_id": "201200459", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the territory currently consisting of 47 residences between the even numbers of 2020-2098 and the odd numbers of 2025-2089 Fairmont Drive, San Mateo, California, be transferred from the Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary and Sequoia Union High School Districts to the San Mateo/Foster City and San Mateo Union High School Districts, such that persons residing within the subject territory would be considered residents of the San Mateo/Foster City and San Mateo Union High School Districts effective July 1, 2013?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 32, "percent_yes": 90.625, "percent_no": 9.375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-05-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.216983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.046955", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the territory currently consisting of 47 residences between the even numbers of 2020-2098 and the odd numbers of 2025-2089 Fairmont Drive, San Mateo, California, be transferred from the Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary and Sequoia Union High School Districts to the San Mateo/Foster City and San Mateo Union High School Districts, such that persons residing within the subject territory would be considered residents of the San Mateo/Foster City and San Mateo Union High School Districts effective July 1, 2013?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5970, "fingerprint": "2012|201200460|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200460|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5014a9836df8dee1", "measure_id": "201200460", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education in local schools by replacing leaky roofs; performing essential safety repairs on classrooms and facilities; updating science labs; equipping classrooms with 21st Century technology; maximizing energy efficiency and water conservation to save money; and renovating, constructing, and equipping classrooms and facilities; shall Cabrillo Unified School District issue $81 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds staying in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3803, "no_votes": 2927, "total_votes": 6730, "percent_yes": 56.5082, "percent_no": 43.4918, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.217259", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.047219", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education in local schools by replacing leaky roofs; performing essential safety repairs on classrooms and facilities; updating science labs; equipping classrooms with 21st Century technology; maximizing energy efficiency and water conservation to save money; and renovating, constructing, and equipping classrooms and facilities; shall Cabrillo Unified School District issue $81 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries and all funds staying in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5974, "fingerprint": "2012|201200058|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200058|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e6a56f98b881ae44", "measure_id": "201200058", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Chapter 5.150 be added to the San Mateo County Ordinance Code, imposing a business license tax of two and one-half percent (2.5%) of gross receipts on operators of vehicle rental businesses located in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57228, "no_votes": 57038, "total_votes": 114266, "percent_yes": 50.0831, "percent_no": 49.9169, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.218477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.048258", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 5.150 be added to the San Mateo County Ordinance Code, imposing a business license tax of two and one-half percent (2.5%) of gross receipts on operators of vehicle rental businesses located in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5975, "fingerprint": "2012|201200059|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200059|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "442c3839f6c6872e", "measure_id": "201200059", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Chapter 5.136 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code be amended to increase the rate of tax, imposed on occupants of lodging within the unincorporated County who reside in such lodging for thirty consecutive calendar days or less, from ten percent to twelve percent of the rent charged by operators of such lodging?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53431, "no_votes": 60711, "total_votes": 114142, "percent_yes": 46.811, "percent_no": 53.189, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.218762", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.048448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 5.136 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code be amended to increase the rate of tax, imposed on occupants of lodging within the unincorporated County who reside in such lodging for thirty consecutive calendar days or less, from ten percent to twelve percent of the rent charged by operators of such lodging?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5973, "fingerprint": "2012|201200462|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200462|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7d97eae09aa63dc9", "measure_id": "201200462", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local elementary and middle school education for all students with funds that cannot be taken by the State, enhance reading, writing, math, and science skills; attract and retain qualified teachers; and support school libraries; shall the Redwood City Elementary School District levy an educational parcel tax of $67 annually for five years only, exempting seniors, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all money benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11181, "no_votes": 4975, "total_votes": 16156, "percent_yes": 69.2065, "percent_no": 30.793499999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.218208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.048065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local elementary and middle school education for all students with funds that cannot be taken by the State, enhance reading, writing, math, and science skills; attract and retain qualified teachers; and support school libraries; shall the Redwood City Elementary School District levy an educational parcel tax of $67 annually for five years only, exempting seniors, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all money benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5976, "fingerprint": "2012|201200060|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200060|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4eb50f9ebed7b050", "measure_id": "201200060", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Chapter 5.152 be added to the San Mateo County Ordinance Code, imposing a business license tax of eight percent of gross receipts on operators of commercial parking facilities located in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53616, "no_votes": 60679, "total_votes": 114295, "percent_yes": 46.9102, "percent_no": 53.0898, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.219049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.048640", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 5.152 be added to the San Mateo County Ordinance Code, imposing a business license tax of eight percent of gross receipts on operators of commercial parking facilities located in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5972, "fingerprint": "2012|201200461|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200461|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ed67f786856f4dff", "measure_id": "201200461", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education for all students, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, by: enhancing math, science, reading and writing skills; providing career training, college preparation and 21st century computer instruction; attracting and retaining qualified teachers; shall Jefferson Union High School District levy $48 annually per parcel for four years, exempting senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds benefiting Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Westmoor and Thornton high schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12544, "no_votes": 6085, "total_votes": 18629, "percent_yes": 67.33590000000001, "percent_no": 32.66409999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.217834", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.047860", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education for all students, with funds that cannot be taken by the State, by: enhancing math, science, reading and writing skills; providing career training, college preparation and 21st century computer instruction; attracting and retaining qualified teachers; shall Jefferson Union High School District levy $48 annually per parcel for four years, exempting senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, and all funds benefiting Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Westmoor and Thornton high schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5971, "fingerprint": "2012|201200057|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200057|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "23196825dfc7957b", "measure_id": "201200057", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 071831 of the County of San Mateo continuing the levy of a special tax for four years at a maximum rate of $65 per parcel per year for extended police and structural fire protection services be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 762, "no_votes": 323, "total_votes": 1085, "percent_yes": 70.2304, "percent_no": 29.769599999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.217530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.047555", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 071831 of the County of San Mateo continuing the levy of a special tax for four years at a maximum rate of $65 per parcel per year for extended police and structural fire protection services be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6002, "fingerprint": "2012|201200473|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200473|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "90a0e0240b73008a", "measure_id": "201200473", "measure_letter": "A-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our junior high and high schools and continue providing dedicated local funding that will otherwise expire for math, science, technology, music, arts, foreign language and theater, and to augment carerr skills courses, shall Santa Barbara Unified School District levy an annual $45 secondary parcel tax for four years, that can't be taken away by the state, with exemptions available for seniors, mandatory independent oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries or benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55320, "no_votes": 23870, "total_votes": 79190, "percent_yes": 69.8573, "percent_no": 30.142700000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.227651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.053941", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our junior high and high schools and continue providing dedicated local funding that will otherwise expire for math, science, technology, music, arts, foreign language and theater, and to augment carerr skills courses, shall Santa Barbara Unified School District levy an annual $45 secondary parcel tax for four years, that can't be taken away by the state, with exemptions available for seniors, mandatory independent oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries or benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6001, "fingerprint": "2012|201200472|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200472|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "e3ae7cffd99b8542", "measure_id": "201200472", "measure_letter": "B-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our elementary schools and to continue providing dedicated local funding that will otherwise expire for classroom music, math, science and technology education, and help maintain class sized, shall Santa Barbara Unified School District levy an annual $48 parcel tax for four years, that can't be taken away by the state, with exemptions available for seniors, mandatory independent citizen oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries or benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24264, "no_votes": 10001, "total_votes": 34265, "percent_yes": 70.8128, "percent_no": 29.187200000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.227244", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.053760", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our elementary schools and to continue providing dedicated local funding that will otherwise expire for classroom music, math, science and technology education, and help maintain class sized, shall Santa Barbara Unified School District levy an annual $48 parcel tax for four years, that can't be taken away by the state, with exemptions available for seniors, mandatory independent citizen oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries or benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5993, "fingerprint": "2012|201200275|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200275|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "00eec583789273ca", "measure_id": "201200275", "measure_letter": "C-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a limit of three consecutive terms in office for Buellton City Council Members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1600, "no_votes": 470, "total_votes": 2070, "percent_yes": 77.2947, "percent_no": 22.705299999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.224640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.052286", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a limit of three consecutive terms in office for Buellton City Council Members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5994, "fingerprint": "2012|201200276|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200276|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "08def6e95c3c7c14", "measure_id": "201200276", "measure_letter": "D-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 3.28.030 of the Buellton Municipal Code be amended to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate, which applies only to transient occupants of hotels (as defined in Section 3.28.020), from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1159, "no_votes": 933, "total_votes": 2092, "percent_yes": 55.401500000000006, "percent_no": 44.598499999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.224910", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.052478", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 3.28.030 of the Buellton Municipal Code be amended to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate, which applies only to transient occupants of hotels (as defined in Section 3.28.020), from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5995, "fingerprint": "2012|201200277|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200277|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "b797dba36fb438b3", "measure_id": "201200277", "measure_letter": "E-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help maintain essential City services such as street pothole repair, park maintenance, law enforcement, youth and senior programs, and other City services, shall the City of Carpinteria adopt an ordinance to raise the City's hotel bed tax (Transient Occupancy Tax) from ten to twelve percent, paid only by hotel guests on their room rates, with annual independent audits, local oversight, and no money going to Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4061, "no_votes": 1159, "total_votes": 5220, "percent_yes": 77.79690000000001, "percent_no": 22.203099999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.225180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.052660", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help maintain essential City services such as street pothole repair, park maintenance, law enforcement, youth and senior programs, and other City services, shall the City of Carpinteria adopt an ordinance to raise the City's hotel bed tax (Transient Occupancy Tax) from ten to twelve percent, paid only by hotel guests on their room rates, with annual independent audits, local oversight, and no money going to Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5997, "fingerprint": "2012|201200278|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200278|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "328d4a522b2a4e07", "measure_id": "201200278", "measure_letter": "G-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Goleta General Plan be amended to require that for the next twenty years any changes to specified policies and designation of certain land 10 acres or more currently designated as Agriculture be required to be approved by the voters as well as the City Council, subject to certain limited exceptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3598, "no_votes": 1412, "total_votes": 5010, "percent_yes": 71.8164, "percent_no": 28.1836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.225840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.053026", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Goleta General Plan be amended to require that for the next twenty years any changes to specified policies and designation of certain land 10 acres or more currently designated as Agriculture be required to be approved by the voters as well as the City Council, subject to certain limited exceptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5998, "fingerprint": "2012|201200279|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200279|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d331532fa80c2314", "measure_id": "201200279", "measure_letter": "H-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to provide additional funding to enhance city services such as public safety, road maintenance, revitalization efforts in Old Town, and provide support for other fundamental City services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax (Bed Tax) charged to hotel guests staying in Goleta from 10% to 12%, with the proceeds placed in the City's General Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9191, "no_votes": 3535, "total_votes": 12726, "percent_yes": 72.2222, "percent_no": 27.7778, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.226235", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.053209", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide additional funding to enhance city services such as public safety, road maintenance, revitalization efforts in Old Town, and provide support for other fundamental City services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax (Bed Tax) charged to hotel guests staying in Goleta from 10% to 12%, with the proceeds placed in the City's General Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5999, "fingerprint": "2012|201200280|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200280|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "5c1215a0828f3369", "measure_id": "201200280", "measure_letter": "I-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide critical funding for library staffing, facilities and service, shall a parcel tax of $20.00 per year be imposed on all parcels of real property in the City of Guadalupe for eight years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 782, "no_votes": 564, "total_votes": 1346, "percent_yes": 58.0981, "percent_no": 41.9019, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.226637", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.053393", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide critical funding for library staffing, facilities and service, shall a parcel tax of $20.00 per year be imposed on all parcels of real property in the City of Guadalupe for eight years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6000, "fingerprint": "2012|201200281|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200281|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "1e75796387fb36d5", "measure_id": "201200281", "measure_letter": "J-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the name of the City be changed to \"Guadalupe Beach\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 185, "no_votes": 419, "total_votes": 604, "percent_yes": 30.6291, "percent_no": 69.3709, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.226952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.053580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the name of the City be changed to \"Guadalupe Beach\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5996, "fingerprint": "2012|201200471|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200471|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "0fb563cc8283af9b", "measure_id": "201200471", "measure_letter": "K-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct and modernize classrooms and support facilities, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, fund necessary maintenance and repairs, purchase leased facilities and provide energy efficiency improvements to reduce annual operating costs, and improve handicapped access, shall the College School District be authorized to issue up to $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits and an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to ensure funds are used only for voter approved improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1429, "no_votes": 1689, "total_votes": 3118, "percent_yes": 45.8307, "percent_no": 54.1693, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.225534", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.052844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct and modernize classrooms and support facilities, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, fund necessary maintenance and repairs, purchase leased facilities and provide energy efficiency improvements to reduce annual operating costs, and improve handicapped access, shall the College School District be authorized to issue up to $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits and an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to ensure funds are used only for voter approved improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6003, "fingerprint": "2012|201200474|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200474|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "1dd0ad0256f95e9d", "measure_id": "201200474", "measure_letter": "L-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; replace old and deteriorating roofs; upgrade inadequate eletrical and plumbing systems; improve student access to computers and technology; modernize outdated classrooms and facilities; make health and safety improvements; replace old heating, ventilation, and cooling systems; and make energy efficiency improvements shall Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District issue $19,840,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5387, "no_votes": 4870, "total_votes": 10257, "percent_yes": 52.5202, "percent_no": 47.4798, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.227932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.054125", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; replace old and deteriorating roofs; upgrade inadequate eletrical and plumbing systems; improve student access to computers and technology; modernize outdated classrooms and facilities; make health and safety improvements; replace old heating, ventilation, and cooling systems; and make energy efficiency improvements shall Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District issue $19,840,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5992, "fingerprint": "2012|201200274|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200274|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "fda4a01cc2c2c4a3", "measure_id": "201200274", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset state budget cuts and maintain/restore essential services, such as: neighborhood police patrols/firefighter staffing; at-risk youth programs, gang/drug suppression/enforcement; improving 9-1-1 emergency medical response times; preventing floods through levee repair; and other vital city services, shall the City of Santa Maria enact a \u00bc-cent sales tax that can\u2019t be taken by the State, expiring in nine years, requiring taxpayer oversight, annual independent audits, with all funds used locally in Santa Maria?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1802, "no_votes": 1128, "total_votes": 2930, "percent_yes": 61.50170000000001, "percent_no": 38.49829999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.224366", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.051967", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset state budget cuts and maintain/restore essential services, such as: neighborhood police patrols/firefighter staffing; at-risk youth programs, gang/drug suppression/enforcement; improving 9-1-1 emergency medical response times; preventing floods through levee repair; and other vital city services, shall the City of Santa Maria enact a \u00bc-cent sales tax that can\u2019t be taken by the State, expiring in nine years, requiring taxpayer oversight, annual independent audits, with all funds used locally in Santa Maria?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5988, "fingerprint": "2012|201200468|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200468|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "04f5230aa31a70cb", "measure_id": "201200468", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; improve student access to computers and modern technology; make energy-efficiency improvements including installing solar panels to reduce electrical and utility costs; build new classrooms; and upgrade school cafeterias to full service; shall the Buellton Union School District issue $3,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee to review all expenditures and ensure NO money is taken away by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 278, "no_votes": 201, "total_votes": 479, "percent_yes": 58.0376, "percent_no": 41.9624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.223157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.051225", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; improve student access to computers and modern technology; make energy-efficiency improvements including installing solar panels to reduce electrical and utility costs; build new classrooms; and upgrade school cafeterias to full service; shall the Buellton Union School District issue $3,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee to review all expenditures and ensure NO money is taken away by the state or used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5990, "fingerprint": "2012|201200469|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200469|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d952b4309859b63d", "measure_id": "201200469", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our junior high and high schools; enhance secondary math, science, technology and career education; protect music, arts, foreign language and theater programs at the secondary level; and protect secondary class size, shall Santa Barbara Unified School District be authorized to implement a $54 annual parcel tax for four years, with an available exemption for senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, without administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9100, "no_votes": 4286, "total_votes": 13386, "percent_yes": 67.9815, "percent_no": 32.0185, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.223775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.051601", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our junior high and high schools; enhance secondary math, science, technology and career education; protect music, arts, foreign language and theater programs at the secondary level; and protect secondary class size, shall Santa Barbara Unified School District be authorized to implement a $54 annual parcel tax for four years, with an available exemption for senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, without administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5991, "fingerprint": "2012|201200470|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200470|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "214eb3881864d81b", "measure_id": "201200470", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our elementary schools; protect class size; enhance elementary math, science and technology education; and offer classroom music and performing arts programs at the elementary school level, shall the Santa Barbara Unified School District be authorized to implement a $54 annual elementary education parcel tax for four years, with an available exemption for senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, without administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local elementary schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3793, "no_votes": 1735, "total_votes": 5528, "percent_yes": 68.6143, "percent_no": 31.3857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.224087", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.051782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our elementary schools; protect class size; enhance elementary math, science and technology education; and offer classroom music and performing arts programs at the elementary school level, shall the Santa Barbara Unified School District be authorized to implement a $54 annual elementary education parcel tax for four years, with an available exemption for senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, without administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local elementary schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 5989, "fingerprint": "2012|201200273|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200273|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "91ae69aba4631142", "measure_id": "201200273", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council allow the construction of a public road and bridge on undeveloped City parkland where a bridge is necessary for a housing development, commonly known as Veronica Meadows, and provides public access along Arroyo Burro Creek?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3853, "no_votes": 1822, "total_votes": 5675, "percent_yes": 67.8943, "percent_no": 32.1057, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.223433", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.051414", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council allow the construction of a public road and bridge on undeveloped City parkland where a bridge is necessary for a housing development, commonly known as Veronica Meadows, and provides public access along Arroyo Burro Creek?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6004, "fingerprint": "2012|201200282|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200282|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "6beff887ecf5e57b", "measure_id": "201200282", "measure_letter": "Z-2012", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Transient Occupancy Tax on visitors to hotels and motels be increased from 10% to 12%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 488, "no_votes": 361, "total_votes": 849, "percent_yes": 57.479400000000005, "percent_no": 42.520599999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.228204", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.054305", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Transient Occupancy Tax on visitors to hotels and motels be increased from 10% to 12%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11437, "fingerprint": "2012|201200283|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200283|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3122654b7082bf04", "measure_id": "201200283", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to modify retirement benefits of City employees and retirees by: increasing employees\u2019 contributions, establishing a voluntary reduced pension plan for current employees, establish pension cost and benefit limitations for new employees, modify disability retirement procedures, temporarily suspend retiree COLAs during emergencies, require voter approval for increases in future pension benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95716, "no_votes": 42964, "total_votes": 138680, "percent_yes": 69.0193, "percent_no": 30.9807, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.070269", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.230482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.055412", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to modify retirement benefits of City employees and retirees by: increasing employees\u2019 contributions, establishing a voluntary reduced pension plan for current employees, establish pension cost and benefit limitations for new employees, modify disability retirement procedures, temporarily suspend retiree COLAs during emergencies, require voter approval for increases in future pension benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6006, "fingerprint": "2012|201200476|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200476|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "06094fde2808e672", "measure_id": "201200476", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away, protect outstanding academic programs in reading, writing, math and science, retain qualified teachers, help protect the full number of instructional days in the school year, and provide books/instructional materials, shall Saratoga Union Elementary School District authorize to levy $68 per parcel annually for eight years with independent oversight, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, a senior citizens\u2019 exemption and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4251, "no_votes": 1853, "total_votes": 6104, "percent_yes": 69.6429, "percent_no": 30.357100000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-05-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.228818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.054672", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away, protect outstanding academic programs in reading, writing, math and science, retain qualified teachers, help protect the full number of instructional days in the school year, and provide books/instructional materials, shall Saratoga Union Elementary School District authorize to levy $68 per parcel annually for eight years with independent oversight, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, a senior citizens\u2019 exemption and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11441, "fingerprint": "2012|201200284|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200284|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c99479837f8cba89", "measure_id": "201200284", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Palo Alto Municipal Code be amended to permit three medical marijuana dispensaries to operate in Palo Alto in any commercial or industrial zone subject to prescribed zoning criteria?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10868, "no_votes": 18322, "total_votes": 29190, "percent_yes": 37.2319, "percent_no": 62.7681, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.071758", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.234414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.056924", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Palo Alto Municipal Code be amended to permit three medical marijuana dispensaries to operate in Palo Alto in any commercial or industrial zone subject to prescribed zoning criteria?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6010, "fingerprint": "2012|201200480|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200480|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a176167a7345a7d5", "measure_id": "201200480", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide affordable education at West Valley and Mission Colleges by updating academic facilities and technology to prepare students for 21st century jobs/transfer to universities, upgrading healthcare, public safety and job-training facilities, and aging buildings for earthquake safety, and acquiring, constructing, repairing and equipping sites, buildings, classrooms and facilities, shall West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $350,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates with citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for Sacramento, administrators\u2019 salaries or employee pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41679, "no_votes": 27916, "total_votes": 69595, "percent_yes": 59.8879, "percent_no": 40.1121, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.231462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.055789", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide affordable education at West Valley and Mission Colleges by updating academic facilities and technology to prepare students for 21st century jobs/transfer to universities, upgrading healthcare, public safety and job-training facilities, and aging buildings for earthquake safety, and acquiring, constructing, repairing and equipping sites, buildings, classrooms and facilities, shall West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $350,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates with citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for Sacramento, administrators\u2019 salaries or employee pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6014, "fingerprint": "2012|201200285|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200285|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "44f67fae5ba30f9f", "measure_id": "201200285", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that (1) requires (a) payment of minimum wages in San Jose at $10 per hour with an annual increase, if any, based on the Consumer Price Index beginning January 1, 2014; (b) City enforcement through fines, penalties, civil actions, or revocation or suspension of permits or licenses; and (c) voter approval of substantive changes to the ordinance; and (2) allows private enforcement through civil actions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 178123, "no_votes": 120491, "total_votes": 298614, "percent_yes": 59.6499, "percent_no": 40.3501, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.234855", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.057105", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that (1) requires (a) payment of minimum wages in San Jose at $10 per hour with an annual increase, if any, based on the Consumer Price Index beginning January 1, 2014; (b) City enforcement through fines, penalties, civil actions, or revocation or suspension of permits or licenses; and (c) voter approval of substantive changes to the ordinance; and (2) allows private enforcement through civil actions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11442, "fingerprint": "2012|201200286|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200286|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a8c40d187e6175ca", "measure_id": "201200286", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall gambling be expanded by amending the Municipal Code to (1) allow the maximum number of Card Tables at San Jose\u2019s two cardrooms to increase by 30 on January 1, 2013 and by an additional 30 on January 1, 2014; (2) allow Cardrooms to offer any form of gaming lawful in California after July 1, 2012, without additional voter approval; and (3) require San Jose to review rules for additional permissible gaming?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120138, "no_votes": 163575, "total_votes": 283713, "percent_yes": 42.3449, "percent_no": 57.6551, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.072138", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.235296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.057290", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall gambling be expanded by amending the Municipal Code to (1) allow the maximum number of Card Tables at San Jose\u2019s two cardrooms to increase by 30 on January 1, 2013 and by an additional 30 on January 1, 2014; (2) allow Cardrooms to offer any form of gaming lawful in California after July 1, 2012, without additional voter approval; and (3) require San Jose to review rules for additional permissible gaming?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6008, "fingerprint": "2012|201200478|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200478|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0907ed7560168a0b", "measure_id": "201200478", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue providing high quality education for local students by repairing and upgrading classrooms and science labs, updating learning technology, replacing leaky roofs, providing classrooms for growing student enrollment, upgrading fire/earthquake safety, maximizing energy efficiency, improving disabled access, and repairing, constructing, acquiring or equipping classrooms, sites and facilities, shall Milpitas Unified School District issue $95,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds staying in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5412, "no_votes": 3037, "total_votes": 8449, "percent_yes": 64.0549, "percent_no": 35.9451, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.229372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.055052", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue providing high quality education for local students by repairing and upgrading classrooms and science labs, updating learning technology, replacing leaky roofs, providing classrooms for growing student enrollment, upgrading fire/earthquake safety, maximizing energy efficiency, improving disabled access, and repairing, constructing, acquiring or equipping classrooms, sites and facilities, shall Milpitas Unified School District issue $95,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds staying in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11440, "fingerprint": "2012|201200484|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200484|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8ec95c2505455f86", "measure_id": "201200484", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student access to computers and modern technology and provide a quality education, repair or replace leaky roofs, upgrade old plumbing, heating/cooling systems, classrooms and outdated restrooms, upgrade fire safety, maximize energy efficiency, improve handicapped accessibility, and modernize, construct and acquire classrooms, equipment, sites and facilities, shall Morgan Hill Unified School District issue $198,250,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds spent on local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15243, "no_votes": 7944, "total_votes": 23187, "percent_yes": 65.7394, "percent_no": 34.2606, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.071382", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.233304", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.056544", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student access to computers and modern technology and provide a quality education, repair or replace leaky roofs, upgrade old plumbing, heating/cooling systems, classrooms and outdated restrooms, upgrade fire safety, maximize energy efficiency, improve handicapped accessibility, and modernize, construct and acquire classrooms, equipment, sites and facilities, shall Morgan Hill Unified School District issue $198,250,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds spent on local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6009, "fingerprint": "2012|201200479|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200479|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1e9439c7667a5961", "measure_id": "201200479", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education in Mountain View, provide safe and modern classrooms, and make schools operate more efficiently, shall the Mountain View Whisman School District remove hazardous lead/asbestos materials, improve earthquake safety, upgrade fire alarms/security, replace outdated and inefficient plumbing/electrical/heating/ventilation, update computers/technology, and upgrade, acquire, construct schools, sites, facilities and equipment by issuing $198 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight and all funds spent on local elementary and middle schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7341, "no_votes": 3522, "total_votes": 10863, "percent_yes": 67.578, "percent_no": 32.422, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.229641", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.055232", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education in Mountain View, provide safe and modern classrooms, and make schools operate more efficiently, shall the Mountain View Whisman School District remove hazardous lead/asbestos materials, improve earthquake safety, upgrade fire alarms/security, replace outdated and inefficient plumbing/electrical/heating/ventilation, update computers/technology, and upgrade, acquire, construct schools, sites, facilities and equipment by issuing $198 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight and all funds spent on local elementary and middle schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11443, "fingerprint": "2012|201200486|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200486|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "eedc87253d321a9c", "measure_id": "201200486", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local schools and support academic programs, prepare students for jobs, save money and improve teacher retention by upgrading technology, classrooms and science labs, improving school safety and security, upgrading energy and water systems to improve efficiency, paying off facility leases, and repairing, constructing, or equipping facilities, sites or classrooms, shall San Jose Unified School District issue 290 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual financial audits and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63447, "no_votes": 25497, "total_votes": 88944, "percent_yes": 71.33359999999999, "percent_no": 28.66640000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.072323", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.235740", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.057485", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local schools and support academic programs, prepare students for jobs, save money and improve teacher retention by upgrading technology, classrooms and science labs, improving school safety and security, upgrading energy and water systems to improve efficiency, paying off facility leases, and repairing, constructing, or equipping facilities, sites or classrooms, shall San Jose Unified School District issue 290 million dollars in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, annual financial audits and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6007, "fingerprint": "2012|201200477|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200477|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c078178c95378c68", "measure_id": "201200477", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue providing high quality education for local students by fixing leaky school roofs, upgrading earthquake/fire safety, removing potentially hazardous materials from old structures, keeping schools clean and well-maintained, updating science labs/education technology, providing classrooms for student enrollment growth, and renovating, acquiring, constructing, equipping classrooms/sites/facilities, shall Cupertino Union School District issue $220,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, all funds staying in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17510, "no_votes": 8922, "total_votes": 26432, "percent_yes": 66.2455, "percent_no": 33.75449999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.229100", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.054861", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue providing high quality education for local students by fixing leaky school roofs, upgrading earthquake/fire safety, removing potentially hazardous materials from old structures, keeping schools clean and well-maintained, updating science labs/education technology, providing classrooms for student enrollment growth, and renovating, acquiring, constructing, equipping classrooms/sites/facilities, shall Cupertino Union School District issue $220,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries, all funds staying in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6011, "fingerprint": "2012|201200481|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200481|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0515bebafbf4b7ca", "measure_id": "201200481", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood schools by removing mold and asbestos; fixing leaky, deteriorated roofs; replacing inefficient/ aging heating, ventilation, and electrical systems to save money; improving fire safety/ security; updating computer technology/science labs for 21st century learning; repairing aging restrooms; and acquiring; constructing, and repairing sites/ facilities, shall Alum Rock Union Elementary School District issue $125 million in bonds at legal rates with required independent financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18442, "no_votes": 4746, "total_votes": 23188, "percent_yes": 79.5325, "percent_no": 20.4675, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.231940", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.055976", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood schools by removing mold and asbestos; fixing leaky, deteriorated roofs; replacing inefficient/ aging heating, ventilation, and electrical systems to save money; improving fire safety/ security; updating computer technology/science labs for 21st century learning; repairing aging restrooms; and acquiring; constructing, and repairing sites/ facilities, shall Alum Rock Union Elementary School District issue $125 million in bonds at legal rates with required independent financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6012, "fingerprint": "2012|201200482|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200482|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cba39adda2620be4", "measure_id": "201200482", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing taxes and to continue providing quality education for local elementary and middle school students by: Attracting and retaining quality teachers; Maintaining strong core academic programs in reading, writing, math and science; Providing updated classroom technology and hands-on science instruction; Keeping libraries open,\r\nshall Berryessa Union School District continue its expiring $79 annual education parcel tax for 8 years, with citizen oversight, a senior exemption, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18868, "no_votes": 5300, "total_votes": 24168, "percent_yes": 78.0702, "percent_no": 21.9298, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.232410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.056165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing taxes and to continue providing quality education for local elementary and middle school students by: Attracting and retaining quality teachers; Maintaining strong core academic programs in reading, writing, math and science; Providing updated classroom technology and hands-on science instruction; Keeping libraries open,\r\nshall Berryessa Union School District continue its expiring $79 annual education parcel tax for 8 years, with citizen oversight, a senior exemption, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6013, "fingerprint": "2012|201200485|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200485|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "abee867b4ad16221", "measure_id": "201200485", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To facilitate math, science, reading/writing programs in local elementary/middle schools by upgrading classrooms, removing asbestos and hazardous materials, repairing dry rot, termite and structural damage, upgrading wiring and fire alarms for safety, repairing deteriorating restrooms, replacing leaky roofs, and acquiring, renovating, constructing classrooms, equipment, sites and facilities, shall Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District issue $25,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions/benefits, and all money benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4482, "no_votes": 1456, "total_votes": 5938, "percent_yes": 75.48, "percent_no": 24.519999999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.233881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.056731", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To facilitate math, science, reading/writing programs in local elementary/middle schools by upgrading classrooms, removing asbestos and hazardous materials, repairing dry rot, termite and structural damage, upgrading wiring and fire alarms for safety, repairing deteriorating restrooms, replacing leaky roofs, and acquiring, renovating, constructing classrooms, equipment, sites and facilities, shall Mt. Pleasant Elementary School District issue $25,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries/pensions/benefits, and all money benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11444, "fingerprint": "2012|201200065|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200065|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b707e0d0b3d76623", "measure_id": "201200065", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Santa Clara enact a one-eight cent sales tax, that cannot be taken by the state, for local priorities such as: law enforcement and public safety; trauma and emergency room services; health coverage for low-income children; economic development and job creation; housing for the homeless; and programs to help students stay in school; for a limited period of ten years, with annual public reports to ensure fiscal responsibility?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 339359, "no_votes": 260141, "total_votes": 599500, "percent_yes": 56.607, "percent_no": 43.393, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.072511", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.236187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.057674", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Santa Clara enact a one-eight cent sales tax, that cannot be taken by the state, for local priorities such as: law enforcement and public safety; trauma and emergency room services; health coverage for low-income children; economic development and job creation; housing for the homeless; and programs to help students stay in school; for a limited period of ten years, with annual public reports to ensure fiscal responsibility?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11439, "fingerprint": "2012|201200483|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200483|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b9a615ddace5ecef", "measure_id": "201200483", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade computer/science labs; improve security/safety; repair, equip, and construct classrooms/facilities at Andrew Hill, Calero, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Yerba Buena, W.C. Overfelt, and District adult, alternative, and charter schools; and acquire property for new schools, shall East Side Union High School District issue $120,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below legal limits and no funds for administrator salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 102531, "no_votes": 40700, "total_votes": 143231, "percent_yes": 71.5844, "percent_no": 28.415599999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.071197", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.232858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.056347", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade computer/science labs; improve security/safety; repair, equip, and construct classrooms/facilities at Andrew Hill, Calero, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Yerba Buena, W.C. Overfelt, and District adult, alternative, and charter schools; and acquire property for new schools, shall East Side Union High School District issue $120,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below legal limits and no funds for administrator salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11438, "fingerprint": "2012|201200064|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200064|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c5829957f717c370", "measure_id": "201200064", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide the Board of Supervisors with flexibility in operating the County jails to ensure continued cost-savings and improvement of efficiencies, shall the Board of Supervisors have the discretion to determine whether the Sheriff, Department of Correction, or any other department or agency, or any combination of them jointly operate the jails?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 199301, "no_votes": 57566, "total_votes": 256867, "percent_yes": 77.5892, "percent_no": 22.410799999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.070456", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.230994", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.055608", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the Board of Supervisors with flexibility in operating the County jails to ensure continued cost-savings and improvement of efficiencies, shall the Board of Supervisors have the discretion to determine whether the Sheriff, Department of Correction, or any other department or agency, or any combination of them jointly operate the jails?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6005, "fingerprint": "2012|201200475|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200475|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "27287257145d1f14", "measure_id": "201200475", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the quality of our local schools and core\r\nacademic programs in math and science, keep libraries open, attract and retain the best qualified teachers and staff, and to provide up-to-date textbooks and classroom technology, shall the Santa Clara Unified School District levy an annual assessment of $84 a year per parcel for five years only, with exemptions for seniors, and all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14954, "no_votes": 5553, "total_votes": 20507, "percent_yes": 72.9214, "percent_no": 27.078599999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-05-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.228476", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.054489", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of our local schools and core\r\nacademic programs in math and science, keep libraries open, attract and retain the best qualified teachers and staff, and to provide up-to-date textbooks and classroom technology, shall the Santa Clara Unified School District levy an annual assessment of $84 a year per parcel for five years only, with exemptions for seniors, and all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6018, "fingerprint": "2012|201200490|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200490|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a176167a7345a7d5", "measure_id": "201200490", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide affordable education at West Valley and Mission Colleges by updating academic facilities and technology to prepare students for 21st century jobs/transfer to universities, upgrading healthcare, public safety and job-training facilities, and aging buildings for earthquake safety, and acquiring, constructing, repairing and equipping sites, buildings, classrooms and facilities, shall West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $350,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates with citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for Sacramento, administrators\u2019 salaries or employee pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 819, "no_votes": 606, "total_votes": 1425, "percent_yes": 57.47370000000001, "percent_no": 42.52629999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.238074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.058411", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide affordable education at West Valley and Mission Colleges by updating academic facilities and technology to prepare students for 21st century jobs/transfer to universities, upgrading healthcare, public safety and job-training facilities, and aging buildings for earthquake safety, and acquiring, constructing, repairing and equipping sites, buildings, classrooms and facilities, shall West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $350,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates with citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for Sacramento, administrators\u2019 salaries or employee pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6015, "fingerprint": "2012|201200487|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200487|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a5d0b8f84a9f9a75", "measure_id": "201200487", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue expiring funding to retain highly qualified\r\nteachers and librarians, protect school art and music\r\ninstruction, provide academic counseling and continue\r\nimproving classroom academics, shall the Santa Cruz City\r\nElementary School District renew its expiring parcel tax at $85 per parcel annually for eight years, with exemptions available for seniors, independent oversight and accountability, no funds for administrator salaries, and guaranteed local control, so funds stay in Santa Cruz elementary and middle schools to preserve quality education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11092, "no_votes": 2607, "total_votes": 13699, "percent_yes": 80.96940000000001, "percent_no": 19.030599999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.236622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.057856", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue expiring funding to retain highly qualified\r\nteachers and librarians, protect school art and music\r\ninstruction, provide academic counseling and continue\r\nimproving classroom academics, shall the Santa Cruz City\r\nElementary School District renew its expiring parcel tax at $85 per parcel annually for eight years, with exemptions available for seniors, independent oversight and accountability, no funds for administrator salaries, and guaranteed local control, so funds stay in Santa Cruz elementary and middle schools to preserve quality education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6017, "fingerprint": "2012|201200489|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200489|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "39810a6aa5ae4e1b", "measure_id": "201200489", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality educational programs with continued\r\nemphasis on math, science, reading and writing, retain\r\nhighly qualified teachers and minimize further increases to\r\nclass size, shall \u201cScotts Valley Unified School District\u201d levy an annual education parcel tax of $48 per parcel for three years, with independent community oversight of all expenditures, no funds for administrator salaries, pensions or benefits, exemption for senior citizens and disabled, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4545, "no_votes": 1427, "total_votes": 5972, "percent_yes": 76.1052, "percent_no": 23.894800000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.237539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.058222", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality educational programs with continued\r\nemphasis on math, science, reading and writing, retain\r\nhighly qualified teachers and minimize further increases to\r\nclass size, shall \u201cScotts Valley Unified School District\u201d levy an annual education parcel tax of $48 per parcel for three years, with independent community oversight of all expenditures, no funds for administrator salaries, pensions or benefits, exemption for senior citizens and disabled, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6021, "fingerprint": "2012|201200492|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200492|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "fdc2cdb252270a06", "measure_id": "201200492", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging schools, which support quality education in\r\nthe Aptos and Watsonville areas, with funding that cannot\r\nbe taken by the State, shall Pajaro Valley Unified School\r\nDistrict upgrade classrooms in all schools, repair leaking\r\nroofs and aging schools, upgrade computers and instructional technology in all schools, and construct, repair and acquire classrooms, sites and equipment, by issuing $150,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, independent audits, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22171, "no_votes": 9990, "total_votes": 32161, "percent_yes": 68.9375, "percent_no": 31.0625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.239876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.059275", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging schools, which support quality education in\r\nthe Aptos and Watsonville areas, with funding that cannot\r\nbe taken by the State, shall Pajaro Valley Unified School\r\nDistrict upgrade classrooms in all schools, repair leaking\r\nroofs and aging schools, upgrade computers and instructional technology in all schools, and construct, repair and acquire classrooms, sites and equipment, by issuing $150,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators, independent audits, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11445, "fingerprint": "2012|201200491|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200491|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "96bb21223bfa7fec", "measure_id": "201200491", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; replace deteriorating\r\nroofs; increase student access to computers and modern\r\ntechnology; replace aging portable classroom for pre-school children; and renovate the multi-purpose building for school and community use; shall the Pacific Elementary School District issue $830,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, have NO money used for administrative salaries or taken by the state, and have all funds spent only on Pacific School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 292, "no_votes": 82, "total_votes": 374, "percent_yes": 78.0749, "percent_no": 21.9251, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.073853", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.239378", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.058976", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; replace deteriorating\r\nroofs; increase student access to computers and modern\r\ntechnology; replace aging portable classroom for pre-school children; and renovate the multi-purpose building for school and community use; shall the Pacific Elementary School District issue $830,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, have NO money used for administrative salaries or taken by the state, and have all funds spent only on Pacific School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6016, "fingerprint": "2012|201200488|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200488|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "f85ed4821184b041", "measure_id": "201200488", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue expiring funding to retain highly qualified\r\nteachers and librarians, prepare students for\r\ncollege/careers, provide academic counseling for at-risk\r\nyouth, and continue improving classroom academics, shall\r\nthe Santa Cruz City High School District renew its expiring parcel tax at $38 per parcel annually for eight years, with exemptions available for seniors, independent oversight and accountability, no funds for administrator salaries, and guaranteed local control, so funds stay in local high schools to preserve quality education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21333, "no_votes": 5665, "total_votes": 26998, "percent_yes": 79.01700000000001, "percent_no": 20.98299999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.237079", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.058040", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue expiring funding to retain highly qualified\r\nteachers and librarians, prepare students for\r\ncollege/careers, provide academic counseling for at-risk\r\nyouth, and continue improving classroom academics, shall\r\nthe Santa Cruz City High School District renew its expiring parcel tax at $38 per parcel annually for eight years, with exemptions available for seniors, independent oversight and accountability, no funds for administrator salaries, and guaranteed local control, so funds stay in local high schools to preserve quality education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6022, "fingerprint": "2012|201200066|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200066|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "76d44440e4aaeff3", "measure_id": "201200066", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect the quality of life in Santa Cruz County by limiting further cuts to police, fire, emergency services, health services, parks and recreation, economic development, job creation, and other essential county services; shall Santa Cruz County be authorized to levy an additional tax of one and one-half of one percent in the Transient Occupancy Tax on people staying at lodging facilities in the unincorporated areas of the county?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80990, "no_votes": 30303, "total_votes": 111293, "percent_yes": 72.7719, "percent_no": 27.228099999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.240394", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.059580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of life in Santa Cruz County by limiting further cuts to police, fire, emergency services, health services, parks and recreation, economic development, job creation, and other essential county services; shall Santa Cruz County be authorized to levy an additional tax of one and one-half of one percent in the Transient Occupancy Tax on people staying at lodging facilities in the unincorporated areas of the county?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6019, "fingerprint": "2012|201200287|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200287|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "40270b4ac1e28747", "measure_id": "201200287", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a City of Capitola permanent sales tax increase of one quarter of one percent be adopted to pay for disaster recovery and to maintain general services including public safety and street improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2343, "no_votes": 1273, "total_votes": 3616, "percent_yes": 64.7954, "percent_no": 35.2046, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.238503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.058608", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a City of Capitola permanent sales tax increase of one quarter of one percent be adopted to pay for disaster recovery and to maintain general services including public safety and street improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6020, "fingerprint": "2012|201200288|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200288|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a489503b2900ad8c", "measure_id": "201200288", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an amendment to the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz \u201cRequiring Voter Approval for Desalination Projects\u201d be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19124, "no_votes": 7389, "total_votes": 26513, "percent_yes": 72.1307, "percent_no": 27.869299999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.238941", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.058791", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an amendment to the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz \u201cRequiring Voter Approval for Desalination Projects\u201d be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6023, "fingerprint": "2012|201200289|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200289|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "f9b5131c4729e8ac", "measure_id": "201200289", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to protect the quality of life in the City of Santa Cruz by supporting efforts to create jobs for local residents; investing in a vibrant local economy; and supporting police, fire, parks and recreation, and other essential city services, shall the City of Santa Cruz be authorized to augment the city\u2019s General Fund by levying an additional tax of one percent in the Transient Occupancy Tax on people staying at local hotels and motels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22399, "no_votes": 4840, "total_votes": 27239, "percent_yes": 82.2314, "percent_no": 17.768600000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.240835", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.059792", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to protect the quality of life in the City of Santa Cruz by supporting efforts to create jobs for local residents; investing in a vibrant local economy; and supporting police, fire, parks and recreation, and other essential city services, shall the City of Santa Cruz be authorized to augment the city\u2019s General Fund by levying an additional tax of one percent in the Transient Occupancy Tax on people staying at local hotels and motels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6024, "fingerprint": "2012|201200290|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200290|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "02569d67c2864eeb", "measure_id": "201200290", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City impose upon and collect a rent control fee from persons occupying a space in a mobile home park to partly reimburse the City for the cost of  defending challenges to its mobile home rent control ordinance and allow a person occupying space in a mobile home park to recover attorney\u2019s fees as additional damages from a person who demands or receives rent in excess of that allowed by the Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5715, "no_votes": 4591, "total_votes": 10306, "percent_yes": 55.4531, "percent_no": 44.5469, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.241278", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.059984", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City impose upon and collect a rent control fee from persons occupying a space in a mobile home park to partly reimburse the City for the cost of  defending challenges to its mobile home rent control ordinance and allow a person occupying space in a mobile home park to recover attorney\u2019s fees as additional damages from a person who demands or receives rent in excess of that allowed by the Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6025, "fingerprint": "2012|201200291|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200291|SHASTA", "content_hash": "429600d0b9fed728", "measure_id": "201200291", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Dolores Lucero be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember, City of Shasta Lake?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1349, "no_votes": 538, "total_votes": 1887, "percent_yes": 71.48910000000001, "percent_no": 28.510899999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-04-10", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.241719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.060170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Dolores Lucero be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember, City of Shasta Lake?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6026, "fingerprint": "2012|201200067|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200067|SHASTA", "content_hash": "705d41680c15f5cd", "measure_id": "201200067", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Chum Creek Bottom Agricultural Lands General Plan Amendment Initiative Be Adopted? Imposes the following restrictions in the Shasta County General Plan that may not be amended except by the voters of Shasta County: (1) until December 31, 2036, precents changes to the designations of land in the Chum Creek Bottom area designated as agricultural lands (A-C or A-cg) on the General Plan Map, adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 1984 and in effect at the time of the initiative, with certain limited excpetions; (2) until December 31, 2036, prevents agricultural lands in the Chum Creek Bottom area from being reviewed every five years for possible land use changes; (3) strictly limits commercial development in the Chum Creek Bottom area to those parcels designated as \"commercial\" (C) and located immediately adjacent to the I-5 interchange/Knighton Road intersection; and (4) exempts from its coverage any project that has obtained a vested right pursuant to state or local law, any project for the construction of public schools or public parks, and any land that, under state or federal law, is beyond the initiative power of local voters.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12678, "no_votes": 31398, "total_votes": 44076, "percent_yes": 28.764, "percent_no": 71.236, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.242182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.060353", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Chum Creek Bottom Agricultural Lands General Plan Amendment Initiative Be Adopted? Imposes the following restrictions in the Shasta County General Plan that may not be amended except by the voters of Shasta County: (1) until December 31, 2036, precents changes to the designations of land in the Chum Creek Bottom area designated as agricultural lands (A-C or A-cg) on the General Plan Map, adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 1984 and in effect at the time of the initiative, with certain limited excpetions; (2) until December 31, 2036, prevents agricultural lands in the Chum Creek Bottom area from being reviewed every five years for possible land use changes; (3) strictly limits commercial development in the Chum Creek Bottom area to those parcels designated as \"commercial\" (C) and located immediately adjacent to the I-5 interchange/Knighton Road intersection; and (4) exempts from its coverage any project that has obtained a vested right pursuant to state or local law, any project for the construction of public schools or public parks, and any land that, under state or federal law, is beyond the initiative power of local voters.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6028, "fingerprint": "2012|201200493|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200493|SHASTA", "content_hash": "8b262250cb3ba119", "measure_id": "201200493", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Anderson and West Valley High Schools, repair leaky roofs, upgrade heating, ventilation, electrical, plumbing and sewer systems, construct vocational education facilities, install energy efficient utility systems, improve safety with new fire alarms , improve technology, modernize restrooms, shall Anderson Union High School District acquire, construct, repair schools, sites, facilities, equipment by issuing $12,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for administrators\u2019 or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8574, "no_votes": 6434, "total_votes": 15008, "percent_yes": 57.1295, "percent_no": 42.8705, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.243096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.060731", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Anderson and West Valley High Schools, repair leaky roofs, upgrade heating, ventilation, electrical, plumbing and sewer systems, construct vocational education facilities, install energy efficient utility systems, improve safety with new fire alarms , improve technology, modernize restrooms, shall Anderson Union High School District acquire, construct, repair schools, sites, facilities, equipment by issuing $12,300,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, NO money for administrators\u2019 or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6027, "fingerprint": "2012|201200068|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200068|SHASTA", "content_hash": "58f20b2529458888", "measure_id": "201200068", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution 2011-091 (General Plan Amendment 08-002) be Adopted? Allows development of the Knighton & Chum Creek Commons Retail Center by changing the land use designation in the Shasta County General Plan from  Part-Time Agricultural (A-cg) to Commerical (C) on approximately 86 acres in the Chum Creek Bottom area.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14991, "no_votes": 29248, "total_votes": 44239, "percent_yes": 33.8864, "percent_no": 66.11359999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.242622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.060542", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution 2011-091 (General Plan Amendment 08-002) be Adopted? Allows development of the Knighton & Chum Creek Commons Retail Center by changing the land use designation in the Shasta County General Plan from  Part-Time Agricultural (A-cg) to Commerical (C) on approximately 86 acres in the Chum Creek Bottom area.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6030, "fingerprint": "2012|201200293|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200293|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "c042779eb03185bb", "measure_id": "201200293", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to allow the keeping of backyard chickens in the City of Yreka?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 891, "no_votes": 851, "total_votes": 1742, "percent_yes": 51.1481, "percent_no": 48.8519, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.244106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.061102", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to allow the keeping of backyard chickens in the City of Yreka?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6029, "fingerprint": "2012|201200292|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200292|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "834dd0f6adee76d4", "measure_id": "201200292", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted to assess a yearly special tax of $25.00 per parcel of land within the City as shown on the last County Assessment rolls and which shall be collected in the same manner as taxes on real property, commencing in the 2012 fiscal year and terminating in the fiscal year 2022 with revenue to be used exclusively for the Dunsmuir Public Library?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 301, "no_votes": 196, "total_votes": 497, "percent_yes": 60.5634, "percent_no": 39.4366, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.243631", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.060923", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted to assess a yearly special tax of $25.00 per parcel of land within the City as shown on the last County Assessment rolls and which shall be collected in the same manner as taxes on real property, commencing in the 2012 fiscal year and terminating in the fiscal year 2022 with revenue to be used exclusively for the Dunsmuir Public Library?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6033, "fingerprint": "2012|201200069|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200069|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "26c30c7f85b60167", "measure_id": "201200069", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a special parcel tax of $12.00 per parcel per year commencing in Fiscal Year 2012-2013 to provide library services, to replace the existing special tax for such services approved by the voters of the district on June 3, 1997.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 268, "no_votes": 234, "total_votes": 502, "percent_yes": 53.386500000000005, "percent_no": 46.613499999999995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.245408", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.061651", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a special parcel tax of $12.00 per parcel per year commencing in Fiscal Year 2012-2013 to provide library services, to replace the existing special tax for such services approved by the voters of the district on June 3, 1997.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6031, "fingerprint": "2012|201200494|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200494|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "294848c6bb177562", "measure_id": "201200494", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, improve student access to modern technology, construct new junior high classrooms, including a science lab, construct a gymnasium/performing arts center for school and community use, shall Butteville Union School District acquire, repair, upgrade classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $3,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and have NO money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 424, "no_votes": 473, "total_votes": 897, "percent_yes": 47.2687, "percent_no": 52.7313, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.244532", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.061283", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, improve student access to modern technology, construct new junior high classrooms, including a science lab, construct a gymnasium/performing arts center for school and community use, shall Butteville Union School District acquire, repair, upgrade classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $3,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and have NO money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6032, "fingerprint": "2012|201200294|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200294|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "e568fb47db63fe1d", "measure_id": "201200294", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should Chapter 17.34 of the Dunsmuir City Code be amended to remove some restrictions on the cultivation of medical marijuana?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 355, "no_votes": 378, "total_votes": 733, "percent_yes": 48.4311, "percent_no": 51.5689, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.244982", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.061469", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Chapter 17.34 of the Dunsmuir City Code be amended to remove some restrictions on the cultivation of medical marijuana?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6036, "fingerprint": "2012|201200495|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200495|SOLANO", "content_hash": "b2fb01bbb2468c54", "measure_id": "201200495", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset the continued loss of significant state funding, shall the Davis Joint Unified School District be authorized to continue a special tax for a period of 4 years not to exceed the base annual rate of $20.00 per dwelling unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $204.00 per parcel for all other parcels, and levy up to an additional $242.00 to cover State funding shortfalls ONLY if the November 2012 Temporary Taxes to Fund Education initiative does not pass?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16, "no_votes": 14, "total_votes": 30, "percent_yes": 53.3333, "percent_no": 46.6667, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.246789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.062194", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset the continued loss of significant state funding, shall the Davis Joint Unified School District be authorized to continue a special tax for a period of 4 years not to exceed the base annual rate of $20.00 per dwelling unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $204.00 per parcel for all other parcels, and levy up to an additional $242.00 to cover State funding shortfalls ONLY if the November 2012 Temporary Taxes to Fund Education initiative does not pass?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6034, "fingerprint": "2012|201200295|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200295|SOLANO", "content_hash": "cd696a2f0da7d6e4", "measure_id": "201200295", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To keep local parks/recreation facilities open/clean/safe with locally controlled funding that cannot be taken away by Sacramento; provide programs for children/teenagers/families/seniors; and prevent parks from becoming a haven for crime, shall Vallejo's indpendent park/recreation agency, Greater Vallejo Recreation Dsitrict, levy $48 per parcel, as specific in the voter pamphlet, annually for 6 years, with independent audits, exemptions for seniors, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8816, "no_votes": 4149, "total_votes": 12965, "percent_yes": 67.99849999999999, "percent_no": 32.00150000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-05-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.245845", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.061830", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep local parks/recreation facilities open/clean/safe with locally controlled funding that cannot be taken away by Sacramento; provide programs for children/teenagers/families/seniors; and prevent parks from becoming a haven for crime, shall Vallejo's indpendent park/recreation agency, Greater Vallejo Recreation Dsitrict, levy $48 per parcel, as specific in the voter pamphlet, annually for 6 years, with independent audits, exemptions for seniors, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6035, "fingerprint": "2012|201200070|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200070|SOLANO", "content_hash": "cc069837df4c9ab1", "measure_id": "201200070", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2011-1724 to extend the 1998 countywide library retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) for a maximum of 16 years, which provides local library funding; prevents library closures; maintains collections of books, databases, and other materials; preserves library hours and children, teen, adult, senior programs, including computer training, homework help, family literacy and children's storytimes, with all revenues staying in Solano County, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53654, "no_votes": 13330, "total_votes": 66984, "percent_yes": 80.0997, "percent_no": 19.9003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.246354", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.062009", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2011-1724 to extend the 1998 countywide library retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) for a maximum of 16 years, which provides local library funding; prevents library closures; maintains collections of books, databases, and other materials; preserves library hours and children, teen, adult, senior programs, including computer training, homework help, family literacy and children's storytimes, with all revenues staying in Solano County, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11446, "fingerprint": "2012|201200300|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200300|SOLANO", "content_hash": "df42bc8fcb9542cc", "measure_id": "201200300", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to continue funding for essential City services, such as libraries, street/park maintenance, public safety, the Performing Arts Center, and local programs for persons of all ages, including seniors and at-risk youth, shall City of Vacaville Ordinance No. 1843 be approved to continue the existing excise tax for twenty-five years without increasing current tax rates and with all funds staying locally with the City of Vacaville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22412, "no_votes": 9546, "total_votes": 31958, "percent_yes": 70.12950000000001, "percent_no": 29.870499999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.077961", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.249293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.063379", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to continue funding for essential City services, such as libraries, street/park maintenance, public safety, the Performing Arts Center, and local programs for persons of all ages, including seniors and at-risk youth, shall City of Vacaville Ordinance No. 1843 be approved to continue the existing excise tax for twenty-five years without increasing current tax rates and with all funds staying locally with the City of Vacaville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6041, "fingerprint": "2012|201200299|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200299|SOLANO", "content_hash": "f6e2c3cf1a281bcd", "measure_id": "201200299", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to protect essential City services from further reductions such as police programs to fight domestic violence, child/elder abuse, gang activity and neighborhood crime; fire/paramedic services for quick emergency response times; street lighting for safety; and other services, shall City of Vacaville Ordinance No. 1844 be approved to enact a quarter-cent transactions and use (sales) tax for five years, with all funds staying locally with the City of Vacaville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25861, "no_votes": 6085, "total_votes": 31946, "percent_yes": 80.95219999999999, "percent_no": 19.04780000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.248972", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.063199", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to protect essential City services from further reductions such as police programs to fight domestic violence, child/elder abuse, gang activity and neighborhood crime; fire/paramedic services for quick emergency response times; street lighting for safety; and other services, shall City of Vacaville Ordinance No. 1844 be approved to enact a quarter-cent transactions and use (sales) tax for five years, with all funds staying locally with the City of Vacaville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6037, "fingerprint": "2012|201200296|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200296|SOLANO", "content_hash": "fc5750a0c877b487", "measure_id": "201200296", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Will an ordinance relating to Additional City Government Meeting and Records Regulations be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1955, "no_votes": 4339, "total_votes": 6294, "percent_yes": 31.0613, "percent_no": 68.9387, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.247222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.062460", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Will an ordinance relating to Additional City Government Meeting and Records Regulations be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6039, "fingerprint": "2012|201200298|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200298|SOLANO", "content_hash": "3ee98daff5aa9f93", "measure_id": "201200298", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For a period of five (5) years, shall a three-quarter cent transactions and use tax to pay for general services for the City of Rio Vista, including police, fire, land-use planning and other city services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2789, "no_votes": 1250, "total_votes": 4039, "percent_yes": 69.05170000000001, "percent_no": 30.94829999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.248143", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.062829", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For a period of five (5) years, shall a three-quarter cent transactions and use tax to pay for general services for the City of Rio Vista, including police, fire, land-use planning and other city services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6038, "fingerprint": "2012|201200297|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200297|SOLANO", "content_hash": "bdccc124b2695dfc", "measure_id": "201200297", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address the City of Fairfield\u2019s Fiscal Emergency, offset significant budget cuts and state financial takeaways, and maintain City services, including neighborhood police patrols, firefighters, 9-1-1 response times, crime, drug and gang prevention programs, maintenance of streets, medians and street lights, parks and recreation services, and other general services, shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a one cent sales tax for five years, with citizen\u2019s oversight, annual independent audits and all funds spent only in Fairfield?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22905, "no_votes": 10941, "total_votes": 33846, "percent_yes": 67.6742, "percent_no": 32.3258, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.247688", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.062643", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address the City of Fairfield\u2019s Fiscal Emergency, offset significant budget cuts and state financial takeaways, and maintain City services, including neighborhood police patrols, firefighters, 9-1-1 response times, crime, drug and gang prevention programs, maintenance of streets, medians and street lights, parks and recreation services, and other general services, shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a one cent sales tax for five years, with citizen\u2019s oversight, annual independent audits and all funds spent only in Fairfield?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6040, "fingerprint": "2012|201200496|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200496|SOLANO", "content_hash": "d9d197212bb5db48", "measure_id": "201200496", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Solano/Yolo County students/veterans for universities/jobs by: Expanding student, military, disabled veteran access to affordable education; Meeting earthquake/fire safety codes; upgrading employer job placement facilities; Upgrading engineering, welding, nursing/firefighter training centers; Acquiring, constructing/repairing facilities, sites/equipment, shall Solano Community College District issue $348,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits/no money for pensions/ administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 88083, "no_votes": 50593, "total_votes": 138676, "percent_yes": 63.517100000000006, "percent_no": 36.482899999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.248581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.063011", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Solano/Yolo County students/veterans for universities/jobs by: Expanding student, military, disabled veteran access to affordable education; Meeting earthquake/fire safety codes; upgrading employer job placement facilities; Upgrading engineering, welding, nursing/firefighter training centers; Acquiring, constructing/repairing facilities, sites/equipment, shall Solano Community College District issue $348,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits/no money for pensions/ administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6061, "fingerprint": "2012|201200507|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200507|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e7d95cb28980b041", "measure_id": "201200507", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical programs including, but not limited to, computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $184.70 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 2%, for no more than eight years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 724, "no_votes": 421, "total_votes": 1145, "percent_yes": 63.23140000000001, "percent_no": 36.76859999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.255372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.067215", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical programs including, but not limited to, computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $184.70 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 2%, for no more than eight years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6042, "fingerprint": "2012|201200497|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200497|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0454d9168295273d", "measure_id": "201200497", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education with local funding that cannot be taken by the state, shall Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District preserve reading, writing, math and science programs; keep school libraries open and available for students; protect art, music and vocational instruction; and attract/retain qualified teachers by leavying $89 per parcel annually for five years, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6929, "no_votes": 3430, "total_votes": 10359, "percent_yes": 66.8887, "percent_no": 33.1113, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.249581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.063562", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education with local funding that cannot be taken by the state, shall Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District preserve reading, writing, math and science programs; keep school libraries open and available for students; protect art, music and vocational instruction; and attract/retain qualified teachers by leavying $89 per parcel annually for five years, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6044, "fingerprint": "2012|201200499|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200499|SONOMA", "content_hash": "2f5bf544f5c45155", "measure_id": "201200499", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing current tax rates, to improve the quality of education at Healdsburg High and Healdsburg Junior High, repair leaky roofs, improve student access to computers/modern technology, add science labs, lower energy costs by upgrading electrical/plumbing systems and installing solar panels, shall Healdsburg Unified School District acquire,construct,repair schools/sites/facilities/equipment by issuing $35,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrators nor be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2790, "no_votes": 1756, "total_votes": 4546, "percent_yes": 61.3726, "percent_no": 38.6274, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.250117", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.063924", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing current tax rates, to improve the quality of education at Healdsburg High and Healdsburg Junior High, repair leaky roofs, improve student access to computers/modern technology, add science labs, lower energy costs by upgrading electrical/plumbing systems and installing solar panels, shall Healdsburg Unified School District acquire,construct,repair schools/sites/facilities/equipment by issuing $35,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrators nor be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6043, "fingerprint": "2012|201200498|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200498|SONOMA", "content_hash": "832238cb0394a1aa", "measure_id": "201200498", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, improve student access to computers and modern technology, make health and safety improvements, modernize outdated classrooms and restrooms, improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels, modernize playgrounds and playfields, and replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems, shall the Guerneville School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 993, "no_votes": 540, "total_votes": 1533, "percent_yes": 64.775, "percent_no": 35.224999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.249851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.063740", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, improve student access to computers and modern technology, make health and safety improvements, modernize outdated classrooms and restrooms, improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels, modernize playgrounds and playfields, and replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems, shall the Guerneville School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6045, "fingerprint": "2012|201200500|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200500|SONOMA", "content_hash": "3bbda7eff7a980ea", "measure_id": "201200500", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, repair or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace old heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Old Adobe Union School District issue $26,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3391, "no_votes": 2578, "total_votes": 5969, "percent_yes": 56.8102, "percent_no": 43.1898, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.250383", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.064101", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, repair or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace old heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Old Adobe Union School District issue $26,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6046, "fingerprint": "2012|201200501|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200501|SONOMA", "content_hash": "5917f1afc9e9240e", "measure_id": "201200501", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair leaky roofs; improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels; repair deteriorating plumbing systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; replace outdated HVAC systems; and renovate,repair,construct and/or upgrade classrooms,restrooms and school facilities; shall the Sebastopol Union School District issue $9,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2869, "no_votes": 1225, "total_votes": 4094, "percent_yes": 70.0782, "percent_no": 29.921800000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.250686", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.064277", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair leaky roofs; improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels; repair deteriorating plumbing systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; replace outdated HVAC systems; and renovate,repair,construct and/or upgrade classrooms,restrooms and school facilities; shall the Sebastopol Union School District issue $9,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6047, "fingerprint": "2012|201200301|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200301|SONOMA", "content_hash": "783b27c0596c3d72", "measure_id": "201200301", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the safety, public services and quality of life of Sonoma, and provide funding for essential services such as police, fire and emergency medical services, street and road maintenance and repairs, flood prevention, park and open space maintenance, graffiti abatement and other general community services, shall an ordinance be adopted temporarily increasing the City sales tax by one-half of one percent for a term of 5 years, with all funds to be spent locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2208, "no_votes": 1083, "total_votes": 3291, "percent_yes": 67.0921, "percent_no": 32.9079, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.251064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.064458", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the safety, public services and quality of life of Sonoma, and provide funding for essential services such as police, fire and emergency medical services, street and road maintenance and repairs, flood prevention, park and open space maintenance, graffiti abatement and other general community services, shall an ordinance be adopted temporarily increasing the City sales tax by one-half of one percent for a term of 5 years, with all funds to be spent locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6062, "fingerprint": "2012|201200508|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200508|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9eb760cba1e23a27", "measure_id": "201200508", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds to keep the school's libraries open; maintain and improve the arts, shop, culinary, technology, and other career education classes, maintain and improve college prep courses; and maintain school counseling; shall the West Sonoma County Union High School District be authorized to levy $48.00 per parcel annually for eight years with specific accountability requirements, have no funds for administrators' salaries, provide a senior citizens' exemption and have all funds stay local and not be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19514, "no_votes": 6991, "total_votes": 26505, "percent_yes": 73.62379999999999, "percent_no": 26.37620000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.255639", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.067393", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds to keep the school's libraries open; maintain and improve the arts, shop, culinary, technology, and other career education classes, maintain and improve college prep courses; and maintain school counseling; shall the West Sonoma County Union High School District be authorized to levy $48.00 per parcel annually for eight years with specific accountability requirements, have no funds for administrators' salaries, provide a senior citizens' exemption and have all funds stay local and not be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6050, "fingerprint": "2012|201200503|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200503|SONOMA", "content_hash": "93954e8f882f4673", "measure_id": "201200503", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds to offset state revenue cuts, for support of quality academic programs, including reading, writing, math, science and technology, enrichment activities such as art, music and drama, retention of highly qualified teachers, and library and student bus transportation services, shall the Fort Ross Elementary School District be authorized to levy $48.00 per parcel annually for eight years, provide a senior citizens' exemption and have funds stay local and not be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 247, "no_votes": 110, "total_votes": 357, "percent_yes": 69.18769999999999, "percent_no": 30.812300000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.251877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.064998", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds to offset state revenue cuts, for support of quality academic programs, including reading, writing, math, science and technology, enrichment activities such as art, music and drama, retention of highly qualified teachers, and library and student bus transportation services, shall the Fort Ross Elementary School District be authorized to levy $48.00 per parcel annually for eight years, provide a senior citizens' exemption and have funds stay local and not be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11447, "fingerprint": "2012|201200504|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200504|SONOMA", "content_hash": "177518f577183a93", "measure_id": "201200504", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize, construct and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to technology; install solar energy systems; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; improve classroom energy efficiency; and upgrade outdated electrical systems; shall the Gravenstein Union School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have No money taken by the state or used for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1971, "no_votes": 1015, "total_votes": 2986, "percent_yes": 66.008, "percent_no": 33.992000000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.079817", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.252145", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.065181", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize, construct and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve student access to technology; install solar energy systems; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; improve classroom energy efficiency; and upgrade outdated electrical systems; shall the Gravenstein Union School District issue $6,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have No money taken by the state or used for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6048, "fingerprint": "2012|201200502|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200502|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a3b1313041fc3d5a", "measure_id": "201200502", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; construct additional classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve energy efficiency; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; make health and safety improvements; and replace old plumbing systems; shall the Wright Elementary School District issue $14,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1913, "no_votes": 1165, "total_votes": 3078, "percent_yes": 62.1507, "percent_no": 37.8493, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.251335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.064641", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; construct additional classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve energy efficiency; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; make health and safety improvements; and replace old plumbing systems; shall the Wright Elementary School District issue $14,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6054, "fingerprint": "2012|201200505|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200505|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0825a0a3e565a787", "measure_id": "201200505", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make health and safety renovations; modernize outdated classrooms and restrooms; improve energy efficiency of facilities; upgrade playgrounds and playfields; increase student access to computers and modern technology; and construct, reconstruct, rehabilitate, replace, lease, furnish or equip school facilities districtwide, shall the Roseland Elementary School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no bond money taken by the state or used for teacher or administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1612, "no_votes": 723, "total_votes": 2335, "percent_yes": 69.0364, "percent_no": 30.9636, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.253342", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.065911", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make health and safety renovations; modernize outdated classrooms and restrooms; improve energy efficiency of facilities; upgrade playgrounds and playfields; increase student access to computers and modern technology; and construct, reconstruct, rehabilitate, replace, lease, furnish or equip school facilities districtwide, shall the Roseland Elementary School District issue $7,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no bond money taken by the state or used for teacher or administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6060, "fingerprint": "2012|201200506|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200506|SONOMA", "content_hash": "cb05b260ffb02ebe", "measure_id": "201200506", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away, protect academic programs in reading assistance, writing, math, art, science and vocal and instrumental music, retain teachers, maintain student counseling services, and provide books and instructional materials, shall the Sebastopol Union School District be authorized to levy $76.00 per parcel annually for eight years with an independent citizens' oversight committee, have no funds for administrators' salaries, provide a senior citizens' exemption and have all funds stay local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4797, "no_votes": 1842, "total_votes": 6639, "percent_yes": 72.2549, "percent_no": 27.745099999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.255040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.067031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide stable funding the State cannot take away, protect academic programs in reading assistance, writing, math, art, science and vocal and instrumental music, retain teachers, maintain student counseling services, and provide books and instructional materials, shall the Sebastopol Union School District be authorized to levy $76.00 per parcel annually for eight years with an independent citizens' oversight committee, have no funds for administrators' salaries, provide a senior citizens' exemption and have all funds stay local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6063, "fingerprint": "2012|201200509|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200509|SONOMA", "content_hash": "d3e7ffe892f953ba", "measure_id": "201200509", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities at Wilson School; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; increase student access to computers and modern technology; improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels to save on energy costs; and replace outdated and inefficient windows; shall the Wilmar Union School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and No money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1075, "no_votes": 604, "total_votes": 1679, "percent_yes": 64.0262, "percent_no": 35.9738, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.255909", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.067576", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities at Wilson School; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; increase student access to computers and modern technology; improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels to save on energy costs; and replace outdated and inefficient windows; shall the Wilmar Union School District issue $4,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and No money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6055, "fingerprint": "2012|201200306|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200306|SONOMA", "content_hash": "5dc850a7a40a8aeb", "measure_id": "201200306", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Rosa City Charter be amended to change the manner in which City Council members are elected from at large elections to each Council member being elected by and from districts created by the Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23012, "no_votes": 34273, "total_votes": 57285, "percent_yes": 40.1711, "percent_no": 59.8289, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.253606", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.066127", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Rosa City Charter be amended to change the manner in which City Council members are elected from at large elections to each Council member being elected by and from districts created by the Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6056, "fingerprint": "2012|201200307|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200307|SONOMA", "content_hash": "d878745a8c8549a7", "measure_id": "201200307", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Binding Arbitration: Shall an amendment to the Santa Rosa City Charter be adopted to limit and clarify the manner in which binding arbitration is used for Police and Fire Department employee disputes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38222, "no_votes": 14800, "total_votes": 53022, "percent_yes": 72.0871, "percent_no": 27.912899999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.253900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.066311", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Binding Arbitration: Shall an amendment to the Santa Rosa City Charter be adopted to limit and clarify the manner in which binding arbitration is used for Police and Fire Department employee disputes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6057, "fingerprint": "2012|201200308|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200308|SONOMA", "content_hash": "142934fd1bf2ff25", "measure_id": "201200308", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 58 be added to the Santa Rosa City Charter to allow for the use of design-build procurement by the City under guidelines to be established by ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34524, "no_votes": 16946, "total_votes": 51470, "percent_yes": 67.07600000000001, "percent_no": 32.92399999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.254240", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.066496", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 58 be added to the Santa Rosa City Charter to allow for the use of design-build procurement by the City under guidelines to be established by ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6058, "fingerprint": "2012|201200309|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200309|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f769f005f0b0dc14", "measure_id": "201200309", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall amendments to the Santa Rosa City Charter be adopted that reorganize, update and clarify certain sections relating to the Charter Review, Mayor, Budget, Elections, Council Vacancy, Public Library, and Pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39620, "no_votes": 12176, "total_votes": 51796, "percent_yes": 76.4924, "percent_no": 23.507599999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.254506", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.066675", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall amendments to the Santa Rosa City Charter be adopted that reorganize, update and clarify certain sections relating to the Charter Review, Mayor, Budget, Elections, Council Vacancy, Public Library, and Pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6049, "fingerprint": "2012|201200302|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200302|SONOMA", "content_hash": "fdddbbf57fa8923c", "measure_id": "201200302", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted prohibiting the construction of roundabouts, traffic circles and other similar traffic features anywhere within the City of Cotati city limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1852, "no_votes": 1367, "total_votes": 3219, "percent_yes": 57.5334, "percent_no": 42.4666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.251602", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.064820", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted prohibiting the construction of roundabouts, traffic circles and other similar traffic features anywhere within the City of Cotati city limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6051, "fingerprint": "2012|201200303|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200303|SONOMA", "content_hash": "cab9275abf488d99", "measure_id": "201200303", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To stabilize City finances, offset declining revenues and the loss of redevelopment, and maintain and protect essential City services, shall the City of Healdsburg adopt an ordinance enacting a one-half of one percent transactions and use tax, automatically expiring in ten years, with annual audits and review, and with all funds spent locally for the benefit of Healdsburg residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2800, "no_votes": 2235, "total_votes": 5035, "percent_yes": 55.6107, "percent_no": 44.3893, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.252468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.065362", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To stabilize City finances, offset declining revenues and the loss of redevelopment, and maintain and protect essential City services, shall the City of Healdsburg adopt an ordinance enacting a one-half of one percent transactions and use tax, automatically expiring in ten years, with annual audits and review, and with all funds spent locally for the benefit of Healdsburg residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6052, "fingerprint": "2012|201200304|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200304|SONOMA", "content_hash": "6ff3cc0b0df57fe2", "measure_id": "201200304", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance enacted by the voters of the City of Healdsburg on November 5, 1996 establishing an urban growth boundary for a term of 20 years be amended to extend the term an additional 14 years through December 31, 2030?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3739, "no_votes": 1228, "total_votes": 4967, "percent_yes": 75.2768, "percent_no": 24.723200000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.252805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.065546", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance enacted by the voters of the City of Healdsburg on November 5, 1996 establishing an urban growth boundary for a term of 20 years be amended to extend the term an additional 14 years through December 31, 2030?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6053, "fingerprint": "2012|201200305|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200305|SONOMA", "content_hash": "5f50a46e15a8561d", "measure_id": "201200305", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Petaluma ordinance enhancing specific park and recreation projects, making trail/field safety improvements and playgrounds more accessible, repairing/replacing outdated, deteriorating facilities, and establishing new recreational opportunities by levying a fifteen-year parcel tax of $52 annually for single-family homes; with specified amounts for multi-family and other properties; exemptions for seniors and others, with resulting revenue remaining local (exempt from state use), annual audits, and oversight by an independent citizens' committee, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16158, "no_votes": 9950, "total_votes": 26108, "percent_yes": 61.8891, "percent_no": 38.1109, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.253075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.065730", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Petaluma ordinance enhancing specific park and recreation projects, making trail/field safety improvements and playgrounds more accessible, repairing/replacing outdated, deteriorating facilities, and establishing new recreational opportunities by levying a fifteen-year parcel tax of $52 annually for single-family homes; with specified amounts for multi-family and other properties; exemptions for seniors and others, with resulting revenue remaining local (exempt from state use), annual audits, and oversight by an independent citizens' committee, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6059, "fingerprint": "2012|201200310|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200310|SONOMA", "content_hash": "66ba76f4a9e16f01", "measure_id": "201200310", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve the safety, public services and quality of life of Sebastopol, and provide funding to maintain essential general fund services such as police, fire, street and road maintenance and repairs, flood prevention, park and open space maintenance, and other general community services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City transactions and use tax by one half of one percent for a term of eight (8) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2969, "no_votes": 1210, "total_votes": 4179, "percent_yes": 71.0457, "percent_no": 28.954300000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.254775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.066853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve the safety, public services and quality of life of Sebastopol, and provide funding to maintain essential general fund services such as police, fire, street and road maintenance and repairs, flood prevention, park and open space maintenance, and other general community services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City transactions and use tax by one half of one percent for a term of eight (8) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6064, "fingerprint": "2012|201200071|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200071|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "0bc8e0f2ea481e21", "measure_id": "201200071", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain local library funding the State cannot take, keep branches open, maintain hours, provide programs for children, teens, adults and seniors, children's storytimes, literacy, homework and job search resources, maintain book, CD, DVD and reference; shall Stanislaus County extend the existing one-eighth of one percent library sales tax for 5 years commencing July 1, 2013 until June 30, 2018, with an independent citizens oversight committee ensuring funds are spent only on Stanislaus County libraries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55863, "no_votes": 12324, "total_votes": 68187, "percent_yes": 81.92620000000001, "percent_no": 18.07379999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.256177", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.067758", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain local library funding the State cannot take, keep branches open, maintain hours, provide programs for children, teens, adults and seniors, children's storytimes, literacy, homework and job search resources, maintain book, CD, DVD and reference; shall Stanislaus County extend the existing one-eighth of one percent library sales tax for 5 years commencing July 1, 2013 until June 30, 2018, with an independent citizens oversight committee ensuring funds are spent only on Stanislaus County libraries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6065, "fingerprint": "2012|201200311|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200311|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "8a06cdc2f67b75e7", "measure_id": "201200311", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of the office of mayor be changed from two years to four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 758, "no_votes": 1477, "total_votes": 2235, "percent_yes": 33.915, "percent_no": 66.08500000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.256445", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.067940", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of the office of mayor be changed from two years to four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1234, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1212|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1212|Statewide", "content_hash": "baf56845d110e335", "measure_id": "CA1212", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 35", "description": "Human Trafficking. Penalties. Sex Offender Registration. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 81.19999695, "percent_no": 18.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased criminal penalties for human trafficking, required con...", "summary_text": "This measure increased criminal penalties for human trafficking, required convicted human traffickers to register as sex offenders, and established new funding mechanisms for victim services through increased fines and asset forfeiture.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 35", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_35_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2035%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2035%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1233, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1211|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1211|Statewide", "content_hash": "93686f1d7f7ed0e7", "measure_id": "CA1211", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 40", "description": "Redistricting. State Senate Districts. Referendum.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.09999847, "percent_no": 27.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure refers to whether California voters would accept the new state S...", "summary_text": "This measure refers to whether California voters would accept the new state Senate district maps drawn by the independent Citizens Redistricting Commission following the 2010 census. A \"yes\" vote approved the new Senate district boundaries, while a \"no\" vote would have rejected them and required new maps to be drawn.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 40", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_40_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2040%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2040%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1232, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1210|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1210|Statewide", "content_hash": "56ab4542b1cc886c", "measure_id": "CA1210", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 36", "description": "Three Strikes Law. Sentencing for Repeat Felony Offenders. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.80000305, "percent_no": 31.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure modified California's Three Strikes law to require that the thir...", "summary_text": "This measure modified California's Three Strikes law to require that the third felony be a serious or violent crime in order to trigger a life sentence, rather than allowing any felony to count as the third strike. It also allowed inmates currently serving life sentences under the previous law to petition for resentencing if their third strike was not a serious or violent felony.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 36", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_36_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2036%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2036%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1231, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1209|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1209|Statewide", "content_hash": "efe038d29e04f41a", "measure_id": "CA1209", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 28", "description": "Limits on Legislators' Terms in Office", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.0, "percent_no": 39.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures | Term Limits\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed term limits on California state legislators, ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed term limits on California state legislators, restricting the number of terms they could serve in the state Assembly and Senate. The measure passed with 61% of the vote in 2012.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 28", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_28_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2028%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2028%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1230, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1208|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1208|Statewide", "content_hash": "5ad22f0a9f38fc80", "measure_id": "CA1208", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 39", "description": "Tax Treatment for Multistate Businesses. Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Funding. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.40000153, "percent_no": 39.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Environmental Protection | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed tax rules for multistate businesses operating in Califor...", "summary_text": "This measure changed tax rules for multistate businesses operating in California to calculate their state taxes based on the percentage of their sales in California, rather than a formula including property and payroll, and directed the resulting additional revenue toward clean energy and energy efficiency programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 39", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_39_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2039%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2039%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1229, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1207|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1207|Statewide", "content_hash": "4770926d6fbcd558", "measure_id": "CA1207", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 30", "description": "Temporary Taxes to Fund Education. Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.29999924, "percent_no": 45.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed | Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed temporary tax increases, including higher income taxes o...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed temporary tax increases, including higher income taxes on high earners and a quarter-cent sales tax increase, with revenues designated for education funding. It also included provisions to prevent the state from reducing funding to local public safety services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 30", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_30_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2030%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2030%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1228, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1206|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1206|Statewide", "content_hash": "9f2fe4baccd46585", "measure_id": "CA1206", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 29", "description": "Imposes Additional Tax on Cigarettes for Cancer Research", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.79999924, "percent_no": 50.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Health | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an additional $1 per pack tax on cigarettes, ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an additional $1 per pack tax on cigarettes, with the revenue dedicated to funding cancer research programs in California. The tax would have been collected at the distributor level and added to existing state and federal cigarette taxes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 29", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_29_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2029%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2029%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1227, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1205|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1205|Statewide", "content_hash": "2616b82035583d52", "measure_id": "CA1205", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 34", "description": "Death Penalty Repeal. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.40000153, "percent_no": 52.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have repealed California's death penalty and replac...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have repealed California's death penalty and replaced it with life imprisonment without the possibility of parole as the maximum punishment for murder. The measure also would have applied this change retroactively to existing death row inmates.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 34", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_34_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2034%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2034%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1226, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1204|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1204|Statewide", "content_hash": "69dbe3974d3dec5e", "measure_id": "CA1204", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 37", "description": "Genetically Engineered Foods. Mandatory Labeling. Inititative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.20000076, "percent_no": 52.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required labeling of genetically engineered foods sol...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required labeling of genetically engineered foods sold in California, with certain exemptions for foods like meat, dairy, and restaurant meals. The initiative would have prohibited marketing such foods as \"natural\" and established penalties for violations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 37", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_37_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2037%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2037%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1225, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1203|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1203|Statewide", "content_hash": "56cc02806a56fc3c", "measure_id": "CA1203", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 33", "description": "Changes Law to Allow Auto Insurance Companies to Set Prices Based on a Driver's History of Insurance Coverage. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.29999924, "percent_no": 54.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed auto insurance companies in California to fac...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed auto insurance companies in California to factor a driver's history of insurance coverage into their pricing decisions. It would have changed existing state law that prohibited insurers from using insurance history as a rating factor when setting premiums.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 33", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_33_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2033%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2033%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1224, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1202|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1202|Statewide", "content_hash": "8c24675ffd5cf0b4", "measure_id": "CA1202", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 32", "description": "Prohibits Political Contributions by Payroll Deduction. Prohibitions on Contributions to Candidates. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.70000076, "percent_no": 56.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited unions, corporations, and government contr...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited unions, corporations, and government contractors from using payroll deductions to collect funds for political contributions to candidates, while allowing such deductions for lobbying activities. It also would have banned direct political contributions to candidates from unions and corporations that receive government contracts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 32", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_32_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2032%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2032%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1223, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1201|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1201|Statewide", "content_hash": "0c6e92e7447ceb6f", "measure_id": "CA1201", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 31", "description": "State Budget. State and Local Government. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.29999924, "percent_no": 60.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required a two-thirds vote in each house of the state...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required a two-thirds vote in each house of the state legislature to pass any state budget, rather than the simple majority then required. It also would have prohibited the state from requiring local governments to provide new programs or services without providing funding to cover the costs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 31", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_31_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2031%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2031%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1222, "fingerprint": "2012|CA1200|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|CA1200|Statewide", "content_hash": "c2625e4fc5672ad3", "measure_id": "CA1200", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 38", "description": "Tax for Education and Early Childhood Programs. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.70000076, "percent_no": 72.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased personal income taxes on earnings over $7,3...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased personal income taxes on earnings over $7,316 for individuals and $14,632 for joint filers, with higher rates for higher incomes, to fund education and early childhood programs. The tax increases would have been temporary, with most provisions lasting four years and the highest earners' increases lasting seven years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 38", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_38_(2012)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2012/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2012", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2038%202012", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2038%202012", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 6066, "fingerprint": "2012|201200312|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200312|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "eb42b8929fbcb7ee", "measure_id": "201200312", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted clarifying that the City\u2019s 10% Transient Occupancy Tax (\u2018hotel tax\u2019) applies to occupancies of thirty days or less at camping sites and in spaces at campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1510, "no_votes": 2301, "total_votes": 3811, "percent_yes": 39.6221, "percent_no": 60.3779, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.256799", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.068121", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted clarifying that the City\u2019s 10% Transient Occupancy Tax (\u2018hotel tax\u2019) applies to occupancies of thirty days or less at camping sites and in spaces at campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6067, "fingerprint": "2012|201200510|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200510|TRINITY", "content_hash": "182d56962b24dd1e", "measure_id": "201200510", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate classrooms and facilities, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, replace outdated plumbing and water storage systems, make health and safety improvements, and improve access to computers and modern technology, shall Southern Trinity Joint Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, equip classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $2,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an\r\nindependent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 155, "no_votes": 122, "total_votes": 277, "percent_yes": 55.956700000000005, "percent_no": 44.043299999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.257072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.068305", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate classrooms and facilities, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, replace outdated plumbing and water storage systems, make health and safety improvements, and improve access to computers and modern technology, shall Southern Trinity Joint Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, equip classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $2,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an\r\nindependent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6068, "fingerprint": "2012|201200313|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200313|TULARE", "content_hash": "ea43fd684e8fc721", "measure_id": "201200313", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended by revising Sections 17 and 68 to update the definitions of appointive officers and provide for daily bank deposits to be made by the Library and Recreation & Parks departments; and repealing Section 56 last amended in 1935 and no longer applicable both as to process and the threshold limit of $2,000 for the Board of Public Utilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2741, "no_votes": 1584, "total_votes": 4325, "percent_yes": 63.3757, "percent_no": 36.6243, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.257335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.068488", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended by revising Sections 17 and 68 to update the definitions of appointive officers and provide for daily bank deposits to be made by the Library and Recreation & Parks departments; and repealing Section 56 last amended in 1935 and no longer applicable both as to process and the threshold limit of $2,000 for the Board of Public Utilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6069, "fingerprint": "2012|201200314|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200314|TULARE", "content_hash": "53394ba623e6f3d4", "measure_id": "201200314", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended revising Sections 23 and 46 regarding purchasing and public contracting authority limits and making those limits a matter of Council policy to provide for easier flexibility and amendment process?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2219, "no_votes": 2064, "total_votes": 4283, "percent_yes": 51.8095, "percent_no": 48.1905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.257598", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.068667", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended revising Sections 23 and 46 regarding purchasing and public contracting authority limits and making those limits a matter of Council policy to provide for easier flexibility and amendment process?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6080, "fingerprint": "2012|201200517|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200517|TULARE", "content_hash": "235c9ea9f30f1ed8", "measure_id": "201200517", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and relieve overcrowding, shall the Visalia Unified School District repair/replace roofs, make schools accessible for disabled students, provide up-to-date science labs, repair/update/equip worn-out schools, construct/equip\r\nnew school facilities, and qualify for available State matching funds, by issuing $60,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates and extending, without raising, the current tax; with citizens' oversight, independent audits, all funds spent locally, and no money for employee or administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26898, "no_votes": 12908, "total_votes": 39806, "percent_yes": 67.5727, "percent_no": 32.4273, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.261961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.071041", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and relieve overcrowding, shall the Visalia Unified School District repair/replace roofs, make schools accessible for disabled students, provide up-to-date science labs, repair/update/equip worn-out schools, construct/equip\r\nnew school facilities, and qualify for available State matching funds, by issuing $60,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates and extending, without raising, the current tax; with citizens' oversight, independent audits, all funds spent locally, and no money for employee or administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6075, "fingerprint": "2012|201200512|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200512|TULARE", "content_hash": "7224e25a4368184b", "measure_id": "201200512", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall a new unified school district, the members of the governing board of which shall be elected from trustee areas, be formed from the existing Exeter Union High School\r\nDistrict and Exeter Union (Elementary) School District, and excluding the Outside Creek School District and the Sequoia Union School District which shall continue to feed into\r\nthe high school of the new unified school district under the same terms that existed before unification?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3402, "no_votes": 1453, "total_votes": 4855, "percent_yes": 70.0721, "percent_no": 29.927899999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.259666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.069933", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a new unified school district, the members of the governing board of which shall be elected from trustee areas, be formed from the existing Exeter Union High School\r\nDistrict and Exeter Union (Elementary) School District, and excluding the Outside Creek School District and the Sequoia Union School District which shall continue to feed into\r\nthe high school of the new unified school district under the same terms that existed before unification?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6072, "fingerprint": "2012|201200511|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200511|TULARE", "content_hash": "888fe7bd75298858", "measure_id": "201200511", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize, construct, and improve classrooms and student support facilities at our school sites, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology,\r\nenhance student safety, provide the local match for State grants, and reduce utility operating costs, shall the Earlimart School District be authorized to issue up to $3,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 672, "no_votes": 175, "total_votes": 847, "percent_yes": 79.33879999999999, "percent_no": 20.661200000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.258475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.069201", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize, construct, and improve classrooms and student support facilities at our school sites, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology,\r\nenhance student safety, provide the local match for State grants, and reduce utility operating costs, shall the Earlimart School District be authorized to issue up to $3,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6078, "fingerprint": "2012|201200515|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200515|TULARE", "content_hash": "891d2d955264bc25", "measure_id": "201200515", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct and improve school facilities, build permanent classrooms, replace outdated portables, complete necessary support facility improvements, increase student access to modern classroom technology, replace leaky roofs and upgrade lighting, window, utility, heating, and air conditioning systems to reduce annual operating costs, shall the Porterville Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $90 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9749, "no_votes": 9263, "total_votes": 19012, "percent_yes": 51.2781, "percent_no": 48.7219, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.261110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.070491", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct and improve school facilities, build permanent classrooms, replace outdated portables, complete necessary support facility improvements, increase student access to modern classroom technology, replace leaky roofs and upgrade lighting, window, utility, heating, and air conditioning systems to reduce annual operating costs, shall the Porterville Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $90 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no funds for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6076, "fingerprint": "2012|201200513|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200513|TULARE", "content_hash": "365a9ff1b7944a59", "measure_id": "201200513", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset State budget cuts, qualify for State matching funds, provide every community equal educational opportunities, and retain/attract quality teachers, by acquiring, constructing, repairing, renovating, furnishing, and equipping new and existing school and community/joint-use facilities including: bathrooms, roofs, fire safety, libraries, technology, energy efficiency, handicap accessibility, and vocational education, shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District issue $40 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, and all money staying local, not for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 200, "no_votes": 220, "total_votes": 420, "percent_yes": 47.619, "percent_no": 52.381, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.260263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.070118", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset State budget cuts, qualify for State matching funds, provide every community equal educational opportunities, and retain/attract quality teachers, by acquiring, constructing, repairing, renovating, furnishing, and equipping new and existing school and community/joint-use facilities including: bathrooms, roofs, fire safety, libraries, technology, energy efficiency, handicap accessibility, and vocational education, shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District issue $40 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, and all money staying local, not for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6077, "fingerprint": "2012|201200514|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200514|TULARE", "content_hash": "154f73dfbc711b54", "measure_id": "201200514", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize, construct, and improve classrooms and student support facilities at our older schools and ensure comparable classrooms for all students throughout the District, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, provide the local match for State grants, and reduce utility operating costs, shall the Lindsay Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $16,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1468, "no_votes": 1035, "total_votes": 2503, "percent_yes": 58.6496, "percent_no": 41.3504, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.260720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.070306", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize, construct, and improve classrooms and student support facilities at our older schools and ensure comparable classrooms for all students throughout the District, increase student access to computers and modern classroom technology, provide the local match for State grants, and reduce utility operating costs, shall the Lindsay Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $16,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11449, "fingerprint": "2012|201200516|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200516|TULARE", "content_hash": "3c7d3bcb29e0ae98", "measure_id": "201200516", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide the highest quality of educational opportunities for students at Three Rivers School, the District shall levy a tax of $60.00 annually per parcel, so long as the Three Rivers School Board oversees expenditures and uses all proceeds\r\nto directly maintain and support strong student/teacher relationships; attract and retain qualified teachers; protect vital academic programs; expand library and technology resources; maintain classroom and school facilities; maintain the autonomy of a single school District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 845, "no_votes": 479, "total_votes": 1324, "percent_yes": 63.8218, "percent_no": 36.1782, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.085432", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.261395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.070681", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the highest quality of educational opportunities for students at Three Rivers School, the District shall levy a tax of $60.00 annually per parcel, so long as the Three Rivers School Board oversees expenditures and uses all proceeds\r\nto directly maintain and support strong student/teacher relationships; attract and retain qualified teachers; protect vital academic programs; expand library and technology resources; maintain classroom and school facilities; maintain the autonomy of a single school District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11448, "fingerprint": "2012|201200316|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200316|TULARE", "content_hash": "e755f3209692c02e", "measure_id": "201200316", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve funding for general city services such as public safety, parks, street repairs, and support of other fundamental City services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax (\u201cHotel Tax\u201d) charged to hotel guests from 4% to a new rate of 8%, equal to the lowest rates currently charged in other Tulare County cities, with proceeds placed in the City\u2019s General Fund subject to the City\u2019s annual independent financial audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1833, "no_votes": 900, "total_votes": 2733, "percent_yes": 67.0692, "percent_no": 32.930800000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.084121", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.258809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.069379", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve funding for general city services such as public safety, parks, street repairs, and support of other fundamental City services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax (\u201cHotel Tax\u201d) charged to hotel guests from 4% to a new rate of 8%, equal to the lowest rates currently charged in other Tulare County cities, with proceeds placed in the City\u2019s General Fund subject to the City\u2019s annual independent financial audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6070, "fingerprint": "2012|201200315|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200315|TULARE", "content_hash": "a3d9bcb1642582a2", "measure_id": "201200315", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter (Sections 4,5,9 & 10) be amended to change the election process for the five City Council members so each is elected from a separate  district in which they reside rather than on an at-large basis?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2285, "no_votes": 2224, "total_votes": 4509, "percent_yes": 50.6764, "percent_no": 49.3236, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.257866", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.068845", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter (Sections 4,5,9 & 10) be amended to change the election process for the five City Council members so each is elected from a separate  district in which they reside rather than on an at-large basis?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6073, "fingerprint": "2012|201200317|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200317|TULARE", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201200317", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1367, "no_votes": 1245, "total_votes": 2612, "percent_yes": 52.3354, "percent_no": 47.6646, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.259127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.069578", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6074, "fingerprint": "2012|201200318|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200318|TULARE", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201200318", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1319, "no_votes": 1306, "total_votes": 2625, "percent_yes": 50.247600000000006, "percent_no": 49.752399999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.259394", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.069757", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6079, "fingerprint": "2012|201200319|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200319|TULARE", "content_hash": "0ee0e57acf6a928d", "measure_id": "201200319", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Visalia be amended to provide for election of Visalia City Council members by five individual Districts rather than from the City at large as currently provided?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14066, "no_votes": 20343, "total_votes": 34409, "percent_yes": 40.8788, "percent_no": 59.1212, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.261674", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.070863", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Visalia be amended to provide for election of Visalia City Council members by five individual Districts rather than from the City at large as currently provided?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6071, "fingerprint": "2012|201200072|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200072|TULARE", "content_hash": "a22dfc83f33daf5a", "measure_id": "201200072", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on July 11, 2012 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Tulare County ordering the formation of the Alpaugh Community Services District be\r\nconfirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91, "no_votes": 29, "total_votes": 120, "percent_yes": 75.83330000000001, "percent_no": 24.16669999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.258138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.069022", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on July 11, 2012 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Tulare County ordering the formation of the Alpaugh Community Services District be\r\nconfirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6082, "fingerprint": "2012|201200074|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200074|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "73f3d4d03fda4689", "measure_id": "201200074", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "#NULL!", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6262, "no_votes": 8056, "total_votes": 14318, "percent_yes": 43.7352, "percent_no": 56.2648, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.262523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.071423", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "#NULL!", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6081, "fingerprint": "2012|201200073|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200073|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "fed3f292c6fc3d98", "measure_id": "201200073", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Groveland Community Services District (the \u201cDistrict\u201d) be authorized to levy an annual special tax of $107 per improved parcel and $53 per unimproved parcel on each non-exempt parcel in the District for ten years, subject to an annual increase of $3.00 in the amount of the special tax, with the proceeds of the special tax to fund only wages and benefits for the District\u2019s fire protection and emergency medical services personnel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 586, "no_votes": 839, "total_votes": 1425, "percent_yes": 41.1228, "percent_no": 58.8772, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.262254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.071235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Groveland Community Services District (the \u201cDistrict\u201d) be authorized to levy an annual special tax of $107 per improved parcel and $53 per unimproved parcel on each non-exempt parcel in the District for ten years, subject to an annual increase of $3.00 in the amount of the special tax, with the proceeds of the special tax to fund only wages and benefits for the District\u2019s fire protection and emergency medical services personnel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6084, "fingerprint": "2012|201200519|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200519|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "d00d93057599677d", "measure_id": "201200519", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing the current tax rate, to modernize, construct and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities;\r\nimprove student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements;\r\nand upgrade P.E. fi elds and facilities for school and community use; shall the Summerville Union High School District issue\r\n$8,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the\r\nstate or used for administrator salaries", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2601, "no_votes": 2130, "total_votes": 4731, "percent_yes": 54.9778, "percent_no": 45.0222, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.263137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.071799", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the current tax rate, to modernize, construct and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities;\r\nimprove student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements;\r\nand upgrade P.E. fi elds and facilities for school and community use; shall the Summerville Union High School District issue\r\n$8,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the\r\nstate or used for administrator salaries", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6083, "fingerprint": "2012|201200518|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200518|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "1bf362058db45cb5", "measure_id": "201200518", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize, construct and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; increase\r\nstudent access to computers and modern technology; repair or replace deteriorating plumbing systems; make health, safety and\r\nhandicapped accessibility improvements; and modernize the library; shall the Sonora Union High School District issue $23,000,000\r\nof bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used\r\nfor administrator salaries", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9171, "no_votes": 7063, "total_votes": 16234, "percent_yes": 56.4925, "percent_no": 43.5075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.262800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.071609", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize, construct and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs; increase\r\nstudent access to computers and modern technology; repair or replace deteriorating plumbing systems; make health, safety and\r\nhandicapped accessibility improvements; and modernize the library; shall the Sonora Union High School District issue $23,000,000\r\nof bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have NO money taken by the state or used\r\nfor administrator salaries", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6092, "fingerprint": "2012|201200322|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200322|VENTURA", "content_hash": "574224f52993bd43", "measure_id": "201200322", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance adding Term Limits for City Council members as follows be adopted: no person shall serve more than three consecutive four-year terms, either by election or appointment, and following a four year absence, a new three consecutive four-year term limit shall apply?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42903, "no_votes": 12233, "total_votes": 55136, "percent_yes": 77.813, "percent_no": 22.186999999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.265436", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.073292", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance adding Term Limits for City Council members as follows be adopted: no person shall serve more than three consecutive four-year terms, either by election or appointment, and following a four year absence, a new three consecutive four-year term limit shall apply?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6089, "fingerprint": "2012|201200523|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200523|VENTURA", "content_hash": "781bbcb1fac00025", "measure_id": "201200523", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Santa Paula Unified School District be formed from the territory of the Santa Paula Union High School District and the Santa Paula Elementary School District, with the Briggs Elementary School District, the Mupu Elementary School District, and Santa Clara Elementary School District remaining independent elementary school districts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5893, "no_votes": 2453, "total_votes": 8346, "percent_yes": 70.6087, "percent_no": 29.3913, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.264635", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.072719", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Paula Unified School District be formed from the territory of the Santa Paula Union High School District and the Santa Paula Elementary School District, with the Briggs Elementary School District, the Mupu Elementary School District, and Santa Clara Elementary School District remaining independent elementary school districts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6090, "fingerprint": "2012|201200321|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200321|VENTURA", "content_hash": "ec777ad13a168f6a", "measure_id": "201200321", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The City's Managed Growth Plan expires December 31, 2012. Shall a new Managed Growth Plan, that will become effective January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2022 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34869, "no_votes": 11568, "total_votes": 46437, "percent_yes": 75.0888, "percent_no": 24.911199999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.264903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.072908", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The City's Managed Growth Plan expires December 31, 2012. Shall a new Managed Growth Plan, that will become effective January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2022 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6086, "fingerprint": "2012|201200320|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200320|VENTURA", "content_hash": "b77a1141b546f019", "measure_id": "201200320", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Moorpark be authorized to develop, construct, or acquire up to a maximum of two hundred (200) low rent housing units, affordable to persons of low income, in the City of Moorpark over a ten (10)-year period commencing upon the effective date of the authorization ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5439, "no_votes": 9031, "total_votes": 14470, "percent_yes": 37.5881, "percent_no": 62.4119, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.263715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.072171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Moorpark be authorized to develop, construct, or acquire up to a maximum of two hundred (200) low rent housing units, affordable to persons of low income, in the City of Moorpark over a ten (10)-year period commencing upon the effective date of the authorization ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6087, "fingerprint": "2012|201200521|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200521|VENTURA", "content_hash": "da1aaa94b3dda529", "measure_id": "201200521", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student computer/technology access; continue repairing, upgrading, equipping, and constructing classrooms and school facilities; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $4,200,000 of Ocean View School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2530, "no_votes": 700, "total_votes": 3230, "percent_yes": 78.32820000000001, "percent_no": 21.67179999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.264030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.072351", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student computer/technology access; continue repairing, upgrading, equipping, and constructing classrooms and school facilities; and reduce overall borrowing costs, shall $4,200,000 of Ocean View School District bonds, previously approved by voters in November 2006, be reauthorized through issuance of new bonds, with no increase in total authorized District debt, interest rates below legal limits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6093, "fingerprint": "2012|201200525|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200525|VENTURA", "content_hash": "3c983c2b1c1b04c6", "measure_id": "201200525", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain academic programs including science, math, reading, writing, arts and music, fund computer technology, and help avoid increased class sizes with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere; shall Ventura Unified School District levy a $59 parcel tax for four years, so long as an independent citizens' oversight committee is required, all funds are spent on neighborhood schools, and no money is used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34927, "no_votes": 16023, "total_votes": 50950, "percent_yes": 68.5515, "percent_no": 31.448499999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.265708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.073474", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain academic programs including science, math, reading, writing, arts and music, fund computer technology, and help avoid increased class sizes with funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere; shall Ventura Unified School District levy a $59 parcel tax for four years, so long as an independent citizens' oversight committee is required, all funds are spent on neighborhood schools, and no money is used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6088, "fingerprint": "2012|201200522|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200522|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e8e1eb2f35e709ae", "measure_id": "201200522", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace portable classrooms, relieve student overcrowding by building and equipping new classrooms and educational facilities and repairing and equipping existing classrooms and educational facilities throughout the District, shall Oxnard School District be authorized to issue up to Ninety Million Dollars $90,000,000.00 in bonds at the lowest possible legal interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits are conducted and no money is used for employee salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19968, "no_votes": 10110, "total_votes": 30078, "percent_yes": 66.3874, "percent_no": 33.6126, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.264364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.072534", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace portable classrooms, relieve student overcrowding by building and equipping new classrooms and educational facilities and repairing and equipping existing classrooms and educational facilities throughout the District, shall Oxnard School District be authorized to issue up to Ninety Million Dollars $90,000,000.00 in bonds at the lowest possible legal interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits are conducted and no money is used for employee salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6091, "fingerprint": "2012|201200524|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200524|VENTURA", "content_hash": "b9f53ca411de2dab", "measure_id": "201200524", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To Improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; improve student access to computers and technology; replace old heating, ventilation and cooling systems; construct science and computer labs, and upgrade inadequate electrical and plumbing systems; shall the Somis Union School District issue $8,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 955, "no_votes": 461, "total_votes": 1416, "percent_yes": 67.4435, "percent_no": 32.5565, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.265168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.073112", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To Improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; improve student access to computers and technology; replace old heating, ventilation and cooling systems; construct science and computer labs, and upgrade inadequate electrical and plumbing systems; shall the Somis Union School District issue $8,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6085, "fingerprint": "2012|201200520|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200520|VENTURA", "content_hash": "9093dee336b81006", "measure_id": "201200520", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of educational facilities; upgrade classroom fire, safety, and security systems; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms and restrooms; replace leaky roofs; upgrade old heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; increase student access to computers and technology; and replace portable classrooms, shall Hueneme Elementary School District issue $19,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, and have NO money taken by the state or used for District employee salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8408, "no_votes": 2603, "total_votes": 11011, "percent_yes": 76.36, "percent_no": 23.64, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.263414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.071986", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of educational facilities; upgrade classroom fire, safety, and security systems; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms and restrooms; replace leaky roofs; upgrade old heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; increase student access to computers and technology; and replace portable classrooms, shall Hueneme Elementary School District issue $19,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, and have NO money taken by the state or used for District employee salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6094, "fingerprint": "2012|201200526|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200526|YOLO", "content_hash": "fdc1df33226cc3e4", "measure_id": "201200526", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Davis Joint Unified School District continue a local parcel tax to preserve existing classroom programs including math, science, English and music; key school-based personnel including librarians, nurses, counselors, school technology and reading specialists; and other programs such as athletics, drama, student nutrition and class size reduction for a period of 5 years not to exceed the Base Annual Tax of $150.00 per unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $320.00 per parcel for all other parcels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12439, "no_votes": 4761, "total_votes": 17200, "percent_yes": 72.3198, "percent_no": 27.6802, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-03-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.265977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.073652", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Davis Joint Unified School District continue a local parcel tax to preserve existing classroom programs including math, science, English and music; key school-based personnel including librarians, nurses, counselors, school technology and reading specialists; and other programs such as athletics, drama, student nutrition and class size reduction for a period of 5 years not to exceed the Base Annual Tax of $150.00 per unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $320.00 per parcel for all other parcels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6095, "fingerprint": "2012|201200323|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200323|YOLO", "content_hash": "5d5b6a4e85b57827", "measure_id": "201200323", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2387, which extends for six years the existing Parks Maintenance Tax of $49 per year on residential units and on non-residential units in amounts specified in the Ordinance, to fund maintenance of parks, street trees, greenbelts, bike paths, medians, public landscaping, urban wildlife and habitat, swimming pools, and recreational facilities be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12322, "no_votes": 2343, "total_votes": 14665, "percent_yes": 84.0232, "percent_no": 15.976799999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-06-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.266298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.073830", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2387, which extends for six years the existing Parks Maintenance Tax of $49 per year on residential units and on non-residential units in amounts specified in the Ordinance, to fund maintenance of parks, street trees, greenbelts, bike paths, medians, public landscaping, urban wildlife and habitat, swimming pools, and recreational facilities be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6096, "fingerprint": "2012|201200527|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200527|YOLO", "content_hash": "b2fb01bbb2468c54", "measure_id": "201200527", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset the continued loss of significant state funding, shall the Davis Joint Unified School District be authorized to continue a special tax for a period of 4 years not to exceed the base annual rate of $20.00 per dwelling unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $204.00 per parcel for all other parcels, and levy up to an additional $242.00 to cover State funding shortfalls ONLY if the November 2012 Temporary Taxes to Fund Education initiative does not pass?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20635, "no_votes": 9253, "total_votes": 29888, "percent_yes": 69.0411, "percent_no": 30.9589, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.266569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.074007", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset the continued loss of significant state funding, shall the Davis Joint Unified School District be authorized to continue a special tax for a period of 4 years not to exceed the base annual rate of $20.00 per dwelling unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $204.00 per parcel for all other parcels, and levy up to an additional $242.00 to cover State funding shortfalls ONLY if the November 2012 Temporary Taxes to Fund Education initiative does not pass?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6098, "fingerprint": "2012|201200324|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200324|YOLO", "content_hash": "e74a573602ea350a", "measure_id": "201200324", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City direct ongoing revenue it receives from the dissolution of its Redevelopment Agency to continue funding community investment projects such as streets, bridges, transportation, parks, and public infrastructure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12768, "no_votes": 1785, "total_votes": 14553, "percent_yes": 87.7345, "percent_no": 12.265500000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.267158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.074371", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City direct ongoing revenue it receives from the dissolution of its Redevelopment Agency to continue funding community investment projects such as streets, bridges, transportation, parks, and public infrastructure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6099, "fingerprint": "2012|201200075|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200075|YOLO", "content_hash": "ae7dede30acc2156", "measure_id": "201200075", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Yolo consolidate the offices of Auditor, Controller, Tax Collector and Treasurer and other countywide fiscal functions under a Department of Finance by establishing an appointed Director of Finance, create an independent finance oversight committee, and require an annual independent audit of the Department of Finance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43575, "no_votes": 22817, "total_votes": 66392, "percent_yes": 65.6329, "percent_no": 34.36709999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.267454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.074554", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Yolo consolidate the offices of Auditor, Controller, Tax Collector and Treasurer and other countywide fiscal functions under a Department of Finance by establishing an appointed Director of Finance, create an independent finance oversight committee, and require an annual independent audit of the Department of Finance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6097, "fingerprint": "2012|201200528|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200528|YOLO", "content_hash": "2d486f3f0464179d", "measure_id": "201200528", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Solano/Yolo County students/veterans for universities/jobs, by: 1) Expanding student, military, disabled veteran access to affordable education, 2) Meeting earthquake/fire safety codes, 3) Upgrading employer job placement facilities, 4) Upgrading engineering, welding, nursing/firefighter training centers, 5) Acquiring, constructing/repairing facilities, sites/equipment, Shall Solano Community College District issue $348,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits/no money for pensions/administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1551, "no_votes": 962, "total_votes": 2513, "percent_yes": 61.719100000000005, "percent_no": 38.280899999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.266891", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.074191", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Solano/Yolo County students/veterans for universities/jobs, by: 1) Expanding student, military, disabled veteran access to affordable education, 2) Meeting earthquake/fire safety codes, 3) Upgrading employer job placement facilities, 4) Upgrading engineering, welding, nursing/firefighter training centers, 5) Acquiring, constructing/repairing facilities, sites/equipment, Shall Solano Community College District issue $348,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits/no money for pensions/administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6101, "fingerprint": "2012|201200076|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200076|YUBA", "content_hash": "55749a77c9691ed5", "measure_id": "201200076", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall any lands presently designated \"natural resources\" on the Yuba County Land Use Map, as part of the General Plan adopted June 7, 2011, remain so designated until 2030 unless annexed to or otherwise included within a city or town, or unless said designation is changed to natural resource lands by a vote of the electorate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9262, "no_votes": 9455, "total_votes": 18717, "percent_yes": 49.4844, "percent_no": 50.5156, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.268122", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.074919", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall any lands presently designated \"natural resources\" on the Yuba County Land Use Map, as part of the General Plan adopted June 7, 2011, remain so designated until 2030 unless annexed to or otherwise included within a city or town, or unless said designation is changed to natural resource lands by a vote of the electorate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6100, "fingerprint": "2012|201200529|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200529|YUBA", "content_hash": "0b5ebc25f6ca6b45", "measure_id": "201200529", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Wheatland High School, repair leaky roofs, replace inadequate electrical systems, modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, replace deteriorating plumbing systems, and improve student access to computers and modem technology, shall Wheatland Union High School District acquire, construct, repair, sites, facilities, and equipment by issuing $9,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, and NO money taken by the State or used for administrators' salaries or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2250, "no_votes": 1387, "total_votes": 3637, "percent_yes": 61.8642, "percent_no": 38.1358, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.267854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.074736", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Wheatland High School, repair leaky roofs, replace inadequate electrical systems, modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities, replace deteriorating plumbing systems, and improve student access to computers and modem technology, shall Wheatland Union High School District acquire, construct, repair, sites, facilities, and equipment by issuing $9,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, and NO money taken by the State or used for administrators' salaries or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6102, "fingerprint": "2012|201200530|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2012|201200530|YUBA", "content_hash": "f4b0519f69984a7f", "measure_id": "201200530", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2012, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For decreasing the number of members of the county board of education from seven to five: Yes/No", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12185, "no_votes": 6097, "total_votes": 18282, "percent_yes": 66.6503, "percent_no": 33.3497, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2012-11-06", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.268439", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.075100", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For decreasing the number of members of the county board of education from seven to five: Yes/No", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6103, "fingerprint": "2011|201100002|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100002|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "bcdba5d9fb582652", "measure_id": "201100002", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Alameda Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain high-quality Alameda schools by protecting small class sizes; core academic, art, music and athletic programs; neighborhood schools; and retaining excellent teachers, shall Alameda Unified School District replace two existing parcel taxes with one annual parcel tax for 7 years in the amounts described in the voter pamphlet, with an exception for seniors, strict accountability measures including oversight by an independent citizens' committee and an annual audit, and every dollar staying in Alameda schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14685, "no_votes": 6907, "total_votes": 21592, "percent_yes": 68.01129999999999, "percent_no": 31.98870000000001, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would replace two existing parcel taxes with a single annual par...", "summary_text": "This measure would replace two existing parcel taxes with a single annual parcel tax for seven years to fund Alameda Unified School District operations, with senior exemptions and oversight requirements. The tax would support various school programs and services with all revenue remaining within the district.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476062", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Alameda Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6104, "fingerprint": "2011|201100035|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100035|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a887af8b36cc399e", "measure_id": "201100035", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Alameda Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect local schools from state budget cuts and provide stable local funding that cannot be taken by the state - to preserve quality instructional time for students, maintain education and after-school activities, and minimize increases in class sizes and reductions to the school year - shall the New Haven Unified School District levy a tax, $180 per parcel for four years, with exemptions for seniors and disabled, citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries and all funds staying local?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7851, "no_votes": 3967, "total_votes": 11818, "percent_yes": 66.4326, "percent_no": 33.567400000000006, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would authorize the New Haven Unified School District to levy a $...", "summary_text": "The measure would authorize the New Haven Unified School District to levy a $180 annual parcel tax for four years to fund local school operations, with exemptions for seniors and disabled residents and restrictions on using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476144", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Alameda Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6106, "fingerprint": "2011|201100075|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100075|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "39dbffa7b820224b", "measure_id": "201100075", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Alameda Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain the high quality of life in Emeryville and fund essential services including police, fire, 9-1-1, park maintenance, litter abatement, graffiti removal, flood protection, street maintenance, accessibility improvements, child care, senior and recreation programs, shall an ordinance be adopted that increases the business tax rate to 0.10% of gross receipts, amends the definition of gross receipts and makes other clarifications?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1111, "no_votes": 236, "total_votes": 1347, "percent_yes": 82.47959999999999, "percent_no": 17.52040000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gasoline Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased the business tax rate in Emeryville to 0", "summary_text": "The measure increased the business tax rate in Emeryville to 0.10% of gross receipts and amended the definition of gross receipts to fund various city services including public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and community programs. The ordinance also included other clarifications to the business tax structure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476225", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Alameda Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6107, "fingerprint": "2011|201100076|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100076|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "81beb97e9330c8f5", "measure_id": "201100076", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Alameda Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain the high quality of life in Emeryville and fund essential services including police, fire, 9-1-1, park maintenance, litter abatement, graffiti removal, flood protection, street maintenance, accessibility improvements, child care, senior and recreation programs, shall an ordinance be adopted that increases the limit on the maximum annual business tax that businesses pay?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1080, "no_votes": 262, "total_votes": 1342, "percent_yes": 80.4769, "percent_no": 19.5231, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gasoline Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476303", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Alameda Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6105, "fingerprint": "2011|201100036|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100036|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8fe5543b4d6df6d8", "measure_id": "201100036", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Alameda Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect local schools from State budget cuts, provide local funding that cannot be taken away by the State, and preserve quality education by: emphasizing core academic instruction in math, science, and reading; attracting and retaining highly-qualified teachers; supporting specialized science and reading instruction, supporting school libraries; and minimizing class size increases, shall Pleasanton Unified School District levy $98 per parcel annually for four years, with a senior exemption, independent oversight and no money for administrators salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13800, "no_votes": 7330, "total_votes": 21130, "percent_yes": 65.31, "percent_no": 34.69, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Pleasanton Unified School District to levy a...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Pleasanton Unified School District to levy a $98 annual parcel tax for four years to fund core academic instruction, teacher retention, specialized programs, and school libraries, with exemptions for seniors and restrictions on using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476387", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Alameda Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6108, "fingerprint": "2011|201100077|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100077|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d65a6b4169390820", "measure_id": "201100077", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Alameda Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance be enacted that amends Emeryville Municipal Code Section 2-1.302 to prohibit the Emeryville City Council from employing a City Attorney and subordinate employees in the City Attorney's Office and require the City Council by contract to designate a City Attorney or law firm to act as City Attorney?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 448, "no_votes": 840, "total_votes": 1288, "percent_yes": 34.7826, "percent_no": 65.2174, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Elections", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited the Emeryville City Council from directly ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited the Emeryville City Council from directly employing a City Attorney and staff, instead requiring the council to contract with an outside attorney or law firm to serve as City Attorney.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476469", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Alameda Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6109, "fingerprint": "2011|201100078|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100078|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "faead0f497c8e855", "measure_id": "201100078", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Alameda Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve quality education, provide safe and modern schools, and qualify for matching funds, shall Newark Unified School District update aging classrooms, libraries, and science labs to meet earthquake/fire/safety standards; improve access for students with disabilities, remove asbestos, lead and hazardous materials; and improve energy/operational efficiency to maximize funding for instructional programs; by issuing $63 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying in Newark?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3286, "no_votes": 2592, "total_votes": 5878, "percent_yes": 55.903400000000005, "percent_no": 44.096599999999995, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize Newark Unified School District to issue $63 mill...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize Newark Unified School District to issue $63 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements including updating classrooms, libraries, and science labs to meet safety standards, removing hazardous materials, and improving energy efficiency. The bonds would be subject to independent oversight with restrictions preventing use of funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476549", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Alameda Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6110, "fingerprint": "2011|201100163|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100163|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "618bcb90186e453b", "measure_id": "201100163", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Alameda Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Oakland City Charter be amended to return the City Attorney to an appointed position?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13287, "no_votes": 36365, "total_votes": 49652, "percent_yes": 26.760299999999997, "percent_no": 73.2397, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-15", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476626", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Alameda Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6111, "fingerprint": "2011|201100164|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100164|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "cc8fe0ba902ee989", "measure_id": "201100164", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Alameda Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Oakland establish a five year temporary fiscal emergency parcel tax to preserve essential city services, including fire, police services, and police technology, youth violence prevention, library, services, parks and recreation, and street repair, by establishing an $80 parcel tax for single-family homes and specified amounts for multi-family and commercial properties with an exemption for low-income households?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19011, "no_votes": 31353, "total_votes": 50364, "percent_yes": 37.7472, "percent_no": 62.2528, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would establish a five-year temporary parcel tax of $80 for sing...", "summary_text": "This measure would establish a five-year temporary parcel tax of $80 for single-family homes in Oakland, with specified amounts for multi-family and commercial properties, to fund fire, police, libraries, parks, street repair, and youth violence prevention services. Low-income households would be exempt from the tax.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-15", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476704", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Alameda Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6112, "fingerprint": "2011|201100165|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100165|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2fb4b45fe72d214d", "measure_id": "201100165", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Alameda Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow the City of Oakland to change the deadline for fully funding its Police and Fire Retirement Plan to a new financially responsible deadline?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22946, "no_votes": 26164, "total_votes": 49110, "percent_yes": 46.7237, "percent_no": 53.2763, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-15", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476783", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Alameda Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6113, "fingerprint": "2011|201100050|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100050|BUTTE", "content_hash": "3226380afe0afe1c", "measure_id": "201100050", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Butte Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Section 500 of the City Charter, which now provides that general municipal elections shall take place in November of each even-numbered year, be amended to provide that general municipal elections shall, instead, take place in June of each even-numbered year?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5244, "no_votes": 10980, "total_votes": 16224, "percent_yes": 32.3225, "percent_no": 67.67750000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476863", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Butte Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6114, "fingerprint": "2011|201100033|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100033|COLUSA", "content_hash": "f519ef3f5a9e3f72", "measure_id": "201100033", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Colusa Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the County of Colusa be authorized to levy a special tax in the amount of $687.57 per parcel in the Walnut Ranch Unincorporated Area as set forth in Attachment 2 to the Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 11-001 for a period of two years to repay the County of Colusa for County funds to be advanced by the County of Colusa to Walnut Ranch Unincorporated Area residents to assist in the potential annexation of said area to the City of Colusa upon the passage of this tax measure?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 106, "percent_yes": 91.5094, "percent_no": 8.4906, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize Colusa County to levy a special tax of $687", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize Colusa County to levy a special tax of $687.57 per parcel in the Walnut Ranch Unincorporated Area for two years to repay the county for funds it would advance to assist residents with the potential annexation of the area to the City of Colusa.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.476944", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Colusa Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6117, "fingerprint": "2011|201100051|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100051|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f6330a2e9e6df0e6", "measure_id": "201100051", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Contra Costa Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Joanne Ward be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3293, "no_votes": 476, "total_votes": 3769, "percent_yes": 87.3707, "percent_no": 12.6293, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477024", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contra Costa Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6118, "fingerprint": "2011|201100052|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100052|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f377810ccc475f5b", "measure_id": "201100052", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Contra Costa Measure 2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Don Kuehne be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3004, "no_votes": 739, "total_votes": 3743, "percent_yes": 80.2565, "percent_no": 19.743499999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477102", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contra Costa Measure 2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6115, "fingerprint": "2011|201100037|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100037|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "a22170da2a0b5586", "measure_id": "201100037", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Contra Costa Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain academic programs including math, science, reading, writing, music, art, and computer technology and retain teachers and other staff, except administrators, at Rodeo Hills Elementary, Carquinez Middle and John Swett and Willow High Schools; shall John Swett Unified School District levy a special tax of $60 per parcel for four years, except industrial/commercial parcels levied at $0.0085 per square foot (see voter pamphlet) with citizens\u2019 oversight and other applicable accountability measures?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1643, "no_votes": 1120, "total_votes": 2763, "percent_yes": 59.4644, "percent_no": 40.5356, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the John Swett Unified School District to levy a...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the John Swett Unified School District to levy a special tax of $60 per residential parcel and $0.0085 per square foot for industrial/commercial parcels for four years to fund academic programs and retain non-administrative staff. The tax would include citizen oversight and accountability measures.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477185", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contra Costa Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6116, "fingerprint": "2011|201100038|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100038|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "cf5e712018c221d9", "measure_id": "201100038", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Contra Costa Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect the quality of schools in Lafayette by reducing deep cuts in programs due to the State budget crisis, to maintain core academic programs in math, science, art and music, attract and retain the best qualified teachers, and maintain classroom technology and science labs, shall the Lafayette School District levy an emergency tax of $176 per parcel for four years only, with exemptions for seniors and all funds staying in Lafayette to benefit our schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7786, "no_votes": 2708, "total_votes": 10494, "percent_yes": 74.1948, "percent_no": 25.8052, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would authorize the Lafayette School District to levy an emergenc...", "summary_text": "The measure would authorize the Lafayette School District to levy an emergency tax of $176 per parcel for four years to fund core academic programs, teacher retention, and classroom technology, with exemptions for seniors and all funds remaining within the district.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477264", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contra Costa Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6119, "fingerprint": "2011|201100053|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100053|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5fc875dd847a002d", "measure_id": "201100053", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Contra Costa Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Should the proceeds of any tax imposed pursuant to the City of Richmond sales tax of 2011 (also on this ballot) be spent one-half on Richmond programs to restore services to the poor that have been cut due to State takeaways, and one-half on School District programs in Richmond to restore educational services and programs that have been eliminated due to State takeaways?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4798, "no_votes": 3635, "total_votes": 8433, "percent_yes": 56.8955, "percent_no": 43.1045, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked voters whether proceeds from a proposed 2011 Rich...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked voters whether proceeds from a proposed 2011 Richmond sales tax should be allocated equally between restoring city services for the poor and restoring school district educational programs that were previously cut due to state funding reductions. The measure passed but was advisory only, meaning it expressed voter preference rather than creating binding policy.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477342", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contra Costa Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6120, "fingerprint": "2011|201100054|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100054|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "c5ca75ed277decf8", "measure_id": "201100054", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Contra Costa Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a \u00bd percent sales tax in the City of Richmond be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3673, "no_votes": 4781, "total_votes": 8454, "percent_yes": 43.4469, "percent_no": 56.5531, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477420", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contra Costa Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6121, "fingerprint": "2011|201100055|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100055|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5a6fe94370c56759", "measure_id": "201100055", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Contra Costa Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 be established at $3,305,662.00 and should the limit for that Fiscal Year (i.e., $3,305,662.00) be used to determine the limits for Fiscal Years 2012-2013 through 2014-2015?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1034, "no_votes": 111, "total_votes": 1145, "percent_yes": 90.3057, "percent_no": 9.694299999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established the Kensington Police Protection and Community Servi...", "summary_text": "This measure established the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District's appropriations limit at $3,305,662 for fiscal year 2011-2012 and used that amount as the baseline to calculate spending limits for the following three fiscal years through 2014-2015.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477501", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contra Costa Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6122, "fingerprint": "2011|201100056|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100056|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "a454bc7c6654080a", "measure_id": "201100056", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Contra Costa Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area R-7A (Alamo Parks and Recreation) be increased to $1,650,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the Fiscal Years 2010/2011 through 2013/2014 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the County Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2153, "no_votes": 499, "total_votes": 2652, "percent_yes": 81.184, "percent_no": 18.816000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the spending limit for Alamo Parks and Recreation (Cou...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the spending limit for Alamo Parks and Recreation (County Service Area R-7A) to $1,650,000 with cost-of-living and population adjustments for fiscal years 2010/2011 through 2013/2014. The increase allowed the service area to spend funds that would otherwise be restricted under California's constitutional spending limits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477581", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contra Costa Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6123, "fingerprint": "2011|201100079|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100079|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "fcf514c7a8fe0631", "measure_id": "201100079", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Contra Costa Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Lafayette be authorized to collect a parcel tax not to exceed $89 per year per equivalent residential unit for ten years, with the purpose to complete Lafayette\u2019s road and drain reconstruction program and bring all failed public streets to a good quality, with a volunteer Oversight Committee reviewing expenditures annually to ensure conformance with the ballot measure, and with the tax terminating if the work is finished in less than ten years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3683, "no_votes": 2708, "total_votes": 6391, "percent_yes": 57.6279, "percent_no": 42.3721, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Transportation", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the City of Lafayette to collect a parcel tax of...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the City of Lafayette to collect a parcel tax of up to $89 per year per residential unit for ten years to fund road and drain reconstruction projects. The tax would be overseen by a volunteer committee and would terminate early if the reconstruction work is completed in less than ten years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477662", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contra Costa Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6124, "fingerprint": "2011|201100080|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100080|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d99169704f199d00", "measure_id": "201100080", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Contra Costa Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide for and maintain the City\u2019s programs and services, including youth facilities, police services, park and recreational facilities; city streets, and other city purposes, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the transient occupancy tax, which is a general tax charged on persons renting hotel rooms, from 8 percent to a maximum of 12 percent and eliminating the tax exemption for federal and state employees traveling on official business?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4264, "no_votes": 1217, "total_votes": 5481, "percent_yes": 77.79599999999999, "percent_no": 22.204000000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax on hotel rooms from 8 perc...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax on hotel rooms from 8 percent to a maximum of 12 percent and eliminated the tax exemption for federal and state employees on official business. The revenue would fund general city programs and services including youth facilities, police, parks, recreation, and street maintenance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477744", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contra Costa Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6125, "fingerprint": "2011|201100081|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100081|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b176a490c1982a2f", "measure_id": "201100081", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Contra Costa Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect certain vacant land from development in the City of Antioch, shall an ordinance be adopted amending the City of Pittsburg's General Plan, amending the previously approved Urban Limit Line to include approximately 193.60 acres in City's southeast area; prezoning land within the amended Urban Limit Line to single family residential, high density residential and general industrial; and allowing for over three dwelling units an acre in residential development south of Buchanan Road?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4361, "no_votes": 1151, "total_votes": 5512, "percent_yes": 79.11829999999999, "percent_no": 20.88170000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Transportation", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would amend Pittsburg's General Plan to extend the Urban Limit L...", "summary_text": "This measure would amend Pittsburg's General Plan to extend the Urban Limit Line to include approximately 193.60 acres in the southeast area, prezone the land for residential and industrial uses, and allow residential development with over three dwelling units per acre south of Buchanan Road.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477824", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contra Costa Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6126, "fingerprint": "2011|201100003|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100003|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "5e41f8bb3df595ba", "measure_id": "201100003", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "El Dorado Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To reduce the impact of budget cuts and ensure all students receive a high quality education by preventing reductions in science, music, art, technology, physical education, college preparation, honors/advanced placement classes and vocational education, retaining librarians, counselors and nurses, and maintaining funding for school equipment and supplies, shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District renew its expiring parcel tax for 7 years, at 135 dollars per year, with senior exemptions, citizens oversight, and annual audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 149, "no_votes": 69, "total_votes": 218, "percent_yes": 68.3486, "percent_no": 31.651399999999995, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would renew an expiring parcel tax of $135 per year for 7 years ...", "summary_text": "This measure would renew an expiring parcel tax of $135 per year for 7 years to fund the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District's educational programs and staff. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and would be subject to citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.477907", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "El Dorado Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11450, "fingerprint": "2011|201100083|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100083|FRESNO", "content_hash": "ca775ba35873cd4d", "measure_id": "201100083", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Mary Villanueva be recalled as board member; Parlier Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 421, "no_votes": 591, "total_votes": 1012, "percent_yes": 41.6008, "percent_no": 58.3992, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.094829", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.712723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.079965", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Mary Villanueva be recalled as board member; Parlier Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6127, "fingerprint": "2011|201100082|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100082|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f742927f1d1d89c0", "measure_id": "201100082", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Fresno Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Mary Villanueva be recalled as board member; Parlier Unified School District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 421, "no_votes": 591, "total_votes": 1012, "percent_yes": 41.6008, "percent_no": 58.3992, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Fresno Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11451, "fingerprint": "2011|201100085|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100085|FRESNO", "content_hash": "12cf6ccb2d9c2901", "measure_id": "201100085", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Enrique Maldonado be recalled as board member; Parlier Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 416, "no_votes": 590, "total_votes": 1006, "percent_yes": 41.3519, "percent_no": 58.6481, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.095205", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.730106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.080325", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Enrique Maldonado be recalled as board member; Parlier Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6128, "fingerprint": "2011|201100084|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100084|FRESNO", "content_hash": "16780baef4923e96", "measure_id": "201100084", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Fresno Measure 2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Enrique Maldonado be recalled as board member; Parlier Unified School District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 416, "no_votes": 590, "total_votes": 1006, "percent_yes": 41.3519, "percent_no": 58.6481, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Fresno Measure 2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6129, "fingerprint": "2011|201100086|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100086|FRESNO", "content_hash": "eef8e666c7849a73", "measure_id": "201100086", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Fresno Measure 3", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall David Torrez be recalled as board member; Parlier Unified School District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 404, "no_votes": 604, "total_votes": 1008, "percent_yes": 40.0794, "percent_no": 59.9206, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.478302", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Fresno Measure 3", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6130, "fingerprint": "2011|201100087|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100087|FRESNO", "content_hash": "737cc1367811131e", "measure_id": "201100087", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Fresno Measure 4", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Melissa Cano be recalled as board member; Parlier Unified School District?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 408, "no_votes": 602, "total_votes": 1010, "percent_yes": 40.396, "percent_no": 59.604, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.478398", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Fresno Measure 4", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6131, "fingerprint": "2011|201100066|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100066|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "713b4aa014cf6efa", "measure_id": "201100066", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Humboldt Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the action taken on October 13,2010, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Humboldt County by adoption of Resolution No. 10-09, thereby ordering the formation of the Scotia Community Services District in the territory described, subject to the terms and conditions specified in that resolution, be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 149, "percent_yes": 93.9597, "percent_no": 6.040300000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would approve the formation of the Scotia Community Services Dis...", "summary_text": "This measure would approve the formation of the Scotia Community Services District in Humboldt County, as previously ordered by the Local Agency Formation Commission in October 2010. The new district would provide community services to the specified Scotia territory under the terms and conditions outlined in the commission's resolution.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-08-30", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.478482", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Humboldt Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6132, "fingerprint": "2011|201100088|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100088|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "1022fcbd699ebf1a", "measure_id": "201100088", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Humboldt Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Proposed reorganization of Fortuna Union Elementary School District and Rohnerville School District.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1226, "no_votes": 1134, "total_votes": 2360, "percent_yes": 51.9492, "percent_no": 48.0508, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure proposed reorganizing the Fortuna Union Elementary School...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure proposed reorganizing the Fortuna Union Elementary School District and Rohnerville School District, combining or restructuring the two school districts. The measure passed with 50.5% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.478566", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Humboldt Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6133, "fingerprint": "2011|201100089|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100089|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "e5cc9701750f1b42", "measure_id": "201100089", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Imperial Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Brawley extend the collection of the Utility User tax in an amount Not to exceed four percent, upon the following utilities: defined telephone, electricity, gas, water, sewer, trash and cable television; in order to maintain City public services, including, but not limited to police, fire, administration, library and parks and recreation, and subject to future council action to reduce said percentage, for a period of time which would expire on May 31, 2018?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1653, "no_votes": 1207, "total_votes": 2860, "percent_yes": 57.797200000000004, "percent_no": 42.202799999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would extend the City of Brawley's utility user tax of up to four...", "summary_text": "The measure would extend the City of Brawley's utility user tax of up to four percent on telephone, electricity, gas, water, sewer, trash, and cable television services through May 31, 2018, to fund city public services including police, fire, administration, library, and parks and recreation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.478646", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Imperial Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6134, "fingerprint": "2011|201100090|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100090|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "9a49b00ad9587d0f", "measure_id": "201100090", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Imperial Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance reducing the Utility Users Tax by 1% a year for a five year period commencing July 1, 2012 until the tax is totally eliminated be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 274, "no_votes": 292, "total_votes": 566, "percent_yes": 48.4099, "percent_no": 51.5901, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have gradually reduced Imperial's Utility Users Tax by 1% ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have gradually reduced Imperial's Utility Users Tax by 1% annually over five years starting July 1, 2012, completely eliminating the tax by the end of the period.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.478725", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Imperial Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6135, "fingerprint": "2011|201100091|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100091|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "2649281570922dec", "measure_id": "201100091", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Imperial Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Holtville reduce the current 5% Utility Users Tax by 0.5% each year beginning with fiscal year 2012-2013, for a period of three years (through November 2016), whereupon the City Council shall consider the continued reduction of the remaining 3.5% Utility Users Tax?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 200, "no_votes": 352, "total_votes": 552, "percent_yes": 36.2319, "percent_no": 63.7681, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have gradually reduced Holtville's utility users tax from 5...", "summary_text": "The measure would have gradually reduced Holtville's utility users tax from 5% to 3.5% over three years, with the city council then considering whether to eliminate the remaining tax. The reduction would have begun in fiscal year 2012-2013 and continued through November 2016.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.478821", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Imperial Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6136, "fingerprint": "2011|201100092|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100092|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "13a39aa6e80a9d69", "measure_id": "201100092", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Imperial Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the electors of the City of Holtville extend the five percent (5%) Utility Users Tax for a period of five years through 2016, in order to maintain City General Government Services, including police (sheriff), fire and emergency paramedic services, parks and recreation services, equipment and facilities?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 241, "no_votes": 325, "total_votes": 566, "percent_yes": 42.579499999999996, "percent_no": 57.420500000000004, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.478914", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Imperial Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6137, "fingerprint": "2011|201100093|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100093|KERN", "content_hash": "b512260acddbff63", "measure_id": "201100093", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Kern Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a city-wide special tax of up to $150.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of ten (10) fiscal years beginning July 1, 2012, for (1) police operations, training and supplies, personnel, equipment, law enforcement, dispatch, code enforcement, and animal control, and (2) fire prevention and suppression operations, training and supplies, firefighter and paramedic personnel, equipment and supplies?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1250, "no_votes": 731, "total_votes": 1981, "percent_yes": 63.0994, "percent_no": 36.9006, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize a special tax of up to $150 per lot or parcel an...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize a special tax of up to $150 per lot or parcel annually for ten fiscal years starting July 1, 2012, to fund police and fire department operations including personnel, training, equipment, and related services. The tax would support police operations, law enforcement, dispatch, code enforcement, animal control, fire prevention and suppression, and firefighter and paramedic services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.478997", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Kern Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6139, "fingerprint": "2011|201100004|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100004|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "08a52a759d550b40", "measure_id": "201100004", "measure_letter": "2P", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure 2P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require the City Council to provide free parking for two hours at particular City-owned parking facilities and limit the amount of monthly parking at those facilities?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3452, "no_votes": 2112, "total_votes": 5564, "percent_yes": 62.0417, "percent_no": 37.9583, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Transportation", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance requires the Los Angeles City Council to provide two hours of ...", "summary_text": "This ordinance requires the Los Angeles City Council to provide two hours of free parking at specified city-owned parking facilities and sets limits on monthly parking rates at those same facilities.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.479076", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure 2P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6140, "fingerprint": "2011|201100005|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100005|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0eb7e943cd9f4621", "measure_id": "201100005", "measure_letter": "3P", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure 3P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to provide Beverly Hills residents with free parking for three hours daily and a discount of 50% from evening rates at particular City-owned parking facilities?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1542, "no_votes": 3855, "total_votes": 5397, "percent_yes": 28.571400000000004, "percent_no": 71.42859999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Transportation", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.479157", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure 3P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11458, "fingerprint": "2011|201100094|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100094|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c4fd661227297356", "measure_id": "201100094", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to limit the number of terms a City Council member may serve at two terms, with a lifetime band thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 52, "percent_yes": 82.6923, "percent_no": 17.307699999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.102015", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.244282", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.086887", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to limit the number of terms a City Council member may serve at two terms, with a lifetime band thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11453, "fingerprint": "2011|201100007|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100007|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "aecb0b352083447c", "measure_id": "201100007", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"An ordinance of the people of the city of Commerce, California, limiting the number of terms and/or total years a member of the City Council may serve\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 675, "no_votes": 250, "total_votes": 925, "percent_yes": 72.973, "percent_no": 27.027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.097835", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.928158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.082867", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"An ordinance of the people of the city of Commerce, California, limiting the number of terms and/or total years a member of the City Council may serve\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11452, "fingerprint": "2011|201100006|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100006|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7a803e4f3f78a604", "measure_id": "201100006", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted (1) imposing a new 7% tax on revenue from off-site advertising signs and (2) amending the City's zoning ordinance to allow tall wall advertising signs to be placed on buildings that meet certain criteria on Santa Monica and Beverly Boulevards without discretionary review by the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1121, "no_votes": 4424, "total_votes": 5545, "percent_yes": 20.2164, "percent_no": 79.7836, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.097649", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.927785", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.082685", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted (1) imposing a new 7% tax on revenue from off-site advertising signs and (2) amending the City's zoning ordinance to allow tall wall advertising signs to be placed on buildings that meet certain criteria on Santa Monica and Beverly Boulevards without discretionary review by the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6138, "fingerprint": "2011|201100001|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100001|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5b95e3023014a7b5", "measure_id": "201100001", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to limit the number of terms a City Council member may serve at two terms, with a lifetime band thereafter?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 52, "percent_yes": 82.6923, "percent_no": 17.307699999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would amend the Vernon City Charter to limit City Council member...", "summary_text": "This measure would amend the Vernon City Charter to limit City Council members to serving a maximum of two terms, with a permanent prohibition on serving additional terms after reaching that limit.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-01-25", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6158, "fingerprint": "2011|201100095|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100095|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f7bfa1999ff192dd", "measure_id": "201100095", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to reaffirm the City's longstanding policy of ensuring the payment of prevailing wages on public works projects?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 52, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment reaffirmed Vernon's existing policy requiring the paym...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment reaffirmed Vernon's existing policy requiring the payment of prevailing wages on public works projects. The measure passed with a narrow margin of 1% in favor.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.479579", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6141, "fingerprint": "2011|201100008|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100008|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b36a326769787890", "measure_id": "201100008", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure BB", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance mandating the city council to utilize a competitive bid process for awarding solid waste (trash) franchises within the city be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4088, "no_votes": 1619, "total_votes": 5707, "percent_yes": 71.6313, "percent_no": 28.368700000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Environment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The ordinance requires the Los Angeles city council to use a competitive bidd...", "summary_text": "The ordinance requires the Los Angeles city council to use a competitive bidding process when awarding solid waste collection franchises within the city. It was adopted by voters in 2011 with 70.7% support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.479662", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure BB", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11460, "fingerprint": "2011|201100097|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100097|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "920542feeba831d1", "measure_id": "201100097", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of City Clerk of the City of Maywood be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 536, "no_votes": 745, "total_votes": 1281, "percent_yes": 41.8423, "percent_no": 58.1577, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.102569", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.261907", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.087428", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of City Clerk of the City of Maywood be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11459, "fingerprint": "2011|201100096|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100096|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "827794c743a9fe02", "measure_id": "201100096", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to remove the provision mandating at-will employment for City employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 52, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.102382", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.261446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.087246", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to remove the provision mandating at-will employment for City employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6142, "fingerprint": "2011|201100009|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100009|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d6cda2694884fdba", "measure_id": "201100009", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Office of City Clerk of the City of Maywood be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 536, "no_votes": 745, "total_votes": 1281, "percent_yes": 41.8423, "percent_no": 58.1577, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6159, "fingerprint": "2011|201100098|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100098|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "23886727a070ef8d", "measure_id": "201100098", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Article VI of the Vernon City Charter be amended to eliminate restrictions on the City Council's authority to remove the City Administrator and to reduce the City Administrator's compensation?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 52, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment eliminates restrictions on the Los Angeles Vernon City...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment eliminates restrictions on the Los Angeles Vernon City Council's authority to remove the City Administrator and reduces the City Administrator's compensation. The measure expands the City Council's power over the City Administrator position while decreasing the associated pay.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.479977", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11468, "fingerprint": "2011|201100167|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100167|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "11611d122269fe04", "measure_id": "201100167", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to require that the City maintain a Housing Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 50, "percent_yes": 98.0, "percent_no": 2.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-22", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.104619", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.314608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.089425", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to require that the City maintain a Housing Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6160, "fingerprint": "2011|201100099|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100099|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1605ed2cb3aa1c75", "measure_id": "201100099", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to require that the City maintain a Housing Commission?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 50, "percent_yes": 98.0, "percent_no": 2.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Housing", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Vernon City Charter to require the city to maintain ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Vernon City Charter to require the city to maintain a Housing Commission. The measure passed by a narrow margin of 1.0%.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11469, "fingerprint": "2011|201100168|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100168|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ed3a10fa05dd178b", "measure_id": "201100168", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to ensure that an Independent Reform Monitor is retained for four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 50, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-22", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.104849", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.314911", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.089607", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to ensure that an Independent Reform Monitor is retained for four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6143, "fingerprint": "2011|201100010|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100010|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c1da74a043d09777", "measure_id": "201100010", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to ensure that an Independent Reform Monitor is retained for four years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 50, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amends the Vernon City Charter to require the retention of an In...", "summary_text": "This measure amends the Vernon City Charter to require the retention of an Independent Reform Monitor for a four-year period.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11470, "fingerprint": "2011|201100169|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100169|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a67a356088fe9cdc", "measure_id": "201100169", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to require a special election to fill vacancies on the City Council and prohibit the appointment of council members by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 50, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-22", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.105076", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.315179", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.089789", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to require a special election to fill vacancies on the City Council and prohibit the appointment of council members by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11454, "fingerprint": "2011|201100012|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100012|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "22ecb1a8d25020a4", "measure_id": "201100012", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall George Mirabal be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3211, "no_votes": 137, "total_votes": 3348, "percent_yes": 95.908, "percent_no": 4.091999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.098845", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:08.999850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.083773", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall George Mirabal be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6144, "fingerprint": "2011|201100011|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100011|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b82a65037b402a53", "measure_id": "201100011", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to require a special election to fill vacancies on the City Council and prohibit the appointment of council members by the City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 50, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Elections", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment requires the City of Vernon to hold special elections ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment requires the City of Vernon to hold special elections to fill vacant City Council seats and prohibits the City Council from appointing members to fill vacancies.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11471, "fingerprint": "2011|201100170|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100170|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ed1c1ab8a232f34b", "measure_id": "201100170", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to prohibit council members from increasing their compensation in excess of cost-of-living adjustments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 50, "percent_yes": 98.0, "percent_no": 2.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-22", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.105299", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.315448", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.089969", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to prohibit council members from increasing their compensation in excess of cost-of-living adjustments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6145, "fingerprint": "2011|201100013|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100013|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e99f935e08d65e0e", "measure_id": "201100013", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to prohibit council members from increasing their compensation in excess of cost-of-living adjustments?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 50, "percent_yes": 98.0, "percent_no": 2.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the Vernon City Charter to prohibit city council members...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the Vernon City Charter to prohibit city council members from increasing their compensation beyond cost-of-living adjustments. The measure passed with 1.0% voting yes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11472, "fingerprint": "2011|201100171|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100171|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "381a7698743f4d60", "measure_id": "201100171", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to remove restrictions on the use of revenues from the City's Light and Power enterprise deposited into the City's Light and Power Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 43, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-22", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.105524", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.315715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.090152", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to remove restrictions on the use of revenues from the City's Light and Power enterprise deposited into the City's Light and Power Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6146, "fingerprint": "2011|201100014|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100014|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c18ce78600091d6c", "measure_id": "201100014", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to remove restrictions on the use of revenues from the City's Light and Power enterprise deposited into the City's Light and Power Fund?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 43, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment removes restrictions on how Vernon can use revenues fr...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment removes restrictions on how Vernon can use revenues from its municipal Light and Power enterprise that are deposited into the Light and Power Fund. The measure passed with 1.0% voting yes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11473, "fingerprint": "2011|201100172|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100172|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ccf0b68626ee3a7f", "measure_id": "201100172", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to require the establishment of a process allowing for open and competitive bidding on City service contracts by City Council ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 43, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-22", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.105765", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.315981", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.090332", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to require the establishment of a process allowing for open and competitive bidding on City service contracts by City Council ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6147, "fingerprint": "2011|201100015|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100015|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d187691717dc28be", "measure_id": "201100015", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to require the establishment of a process allowing for open and competitive bidding on City service contracts by City Council ordinance?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 43, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment would require the City of Vernon to establish a proces...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment would require the City of Vernon to establish a process through City Council ordinance that mandates open and competitive bidding for city service contracts.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6157, "fingerprint": "2011|201100100|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100100|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a1cdb3371f7c3298", "measure_id": "201100100", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide local school funding that cannot be taken by state government; retain high-quality teachers; preserve smaller class sizes; minimize teacher layoffs; and protect academic opportunities and high achievement in science, math, reading and the arts; shall the Las Virgenes Unified School District establish a local parcel tax of $95 annually for eight years, with exemptions for seniors, independent fiscal oversight, no funds for administrator salaries, and guaranteeing every dollar stays within our community preserving quality education?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4290, "no_votes": 3290, "total_votes": 7580, "percent_yes": 56.5963, "percent_no": 43.4037, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would establish a $95 annual parcel tax for eight years i...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would establish a $95 annual parcel tax for eight years in the Las Virgenes Unified School District to fund local schools, with exemptions for seniors and restrictions preventing funds from being used for administrator salaries. The measure includes provisions for independent fiscal oversight and guarantees that funds would remain within the local district.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.481092", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11455, "fingerprint": "2011|201100017|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100017|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6bf4cefe9f105be8", "measure_id": "201100017", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Luis Artiga be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3227, "no_votes": 141, "total_votes": 3368, "percent_yes": 95.8135, "percent_no": 4.186499999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.099774", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.081221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.084682", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Luis Artiga be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6148, "fingerprint": "2011|201100016|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100016|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5268a46de7c83d28", "measure_id": "201100016", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Luis Artiga be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3227, "no_votes": 141, "total_votes": 3368, "percent_yes": 95.81349999999999, "percent_no": 4.186500000000009, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would recall Luis Artiga from his position on the Los Angeles Ci...", "summary_text": "This measure would recall Luis Artiga from his position on the Los Angeles City Council. The measure passed, resulting in Artiga's removal from office.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11461, "fingerprint": "2011|201100101|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100101|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "19875f148b1ac377", "measure_id": "201100101", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing existing taxes and to protect the quality of education and promote student achievement shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District extend the existing school parcel taxes to fund advanced programs in math, science and technology, keep classroom technology up-to-date, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and maintain manageable class sizes, with an exemption for seniors, a cost of living adjustment for inflation, with all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9499, "no_votes": 4298, "total_votes": 13797, "percent_yes": 68.8483, "percent_no": 31.151700000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.103126", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.295600", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.087975", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing existing taxes and to protect the quality of education and promote student achievement shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District extend the existing school parcel taxes to fund advanced programs in math, science and technology, keep classroom technology up-to-date, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and maintain manageable class sizes, with an exemption for seniors, a cost of living adjustment for inflation, with all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6149, "fingerprint": "2011|201100018|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100018|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "451ebe5f25c6bc69", "measure_id": "201100018", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Without increasing existing taxes and to protect the quality of education and promote student achievement shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District extend the existing school parcel taxes to fund advanced programs in math, science and technology, keep classroom technology up-to-date, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and maintain manageable class sizes, with an exemption for seniors, a cost of living adjustment for inflation, with all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9499, "no_votes": 4298, "total_votes": 13797, "percent_yes": 68.8483, "percent_no": 31.151700000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended existing parcel taxes for the Palos Verdes Peninsula Un...", "summary_text": "This measure extended existing parcel taxes for the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District to fund advanced math, science and technology programs, maintain classroom technology, support teacher retention, and keep class sizes manageable. The measure included a senior exemption and cost of living adjustments for inflation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11462, "fingerprint": "2011|201100102|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100102|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "458e8e66651714c4", "measure_id": "201100102", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted as recommended by the Business License Tax Review Committee, comprised of residents and business owners, and a unanimous City Council to simplify, update and restructure the City's business license tax Ordinance and offer incentives for new businesses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1703, "no_votes": 1076, "total_votes": 2779, "percent_yes": 61.281, "percent_no": 38.719, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.103311", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.295926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.088156", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted as recommended by the Business License Tax Review Committee, comprised of residents and business owners, and a unanimous City Council to simplify, update and restructure the City's business license tax Ordinance and offer incentives for new businesses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6150, "fingerprint": "2011|201100019|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100019|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fa1000d50ff70457", "measure_id": "201100019", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted as recommended by the Business License Tax Review Committee, comprised of residents and business owners, and a unanimous City Council to simplify, update and restructure the City's business license tax Ordinance and offer incentives for new businesses?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1703, "no_votes": 1076, "total_votes": 2779, "percent_yes": 61.281, "percent_no": 38.719, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure adopted an ordinance to simplify, update and restructure Los Ang...", "summary_text": "This measure adopted an ordinance to simplify, update and restructure Los Angeles's business license tax ordinance and provide incentives for new businesses, as recommended by a committee of residents and business owners and approved unanimously by the City Council.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11463, "fingerprint": "2011|201100103|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100103|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9f6dc8497c2b6ea0", "measure_id": "201100103", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved which requires franchises for providing solid waste (trash) hauling services to be awarded through a competitive bidding process requiring a public hearing and other compliance requirements to ensure fairness and transparency?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3039, "no_votes": 1236, "total_votes": 4275, "percent_yes": 71.0877, "percent_no": 28.912300000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.103496", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.296284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.088335", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved which requires franchises for providing solid waste (trash) hauling services to be awarded through a competitive bidding process requiring a public hearing and other compliance requirements to ensure fairness and transparency?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11457, "fingerprint": "2011|201100022|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100022|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3bb169a9fb1797c2", "measure_id": "201100022", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Oscar Hernandez be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3213, "no_votes": 161, "total_votes": 3374, "percent_yes": 95.2282, "percent_no": 4.771799999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.100704", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.134568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.085596", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Oscar Hernandez be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11456, "fingerprint": "2011|201100021|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100021|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ccd13675e7ef0a75", "measure_id": "201100021", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to fund general municipal services, including but not limited to such matters as police protection and crime suppression services, fire prevention and suppression services, park and recreation facilities, and general improvements throughout the City, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax on oil producing businesses of $1.44 per barrel of oil produced in the City of Los Angeles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 99500, "no_votes": 105928, "total_votes": 205428, "percent_yes": 48.4355, "percent_no": 51.5645, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.100520", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.134254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.085415", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to fund general municipal services, including but not limited to such matters as police protection and crime suppression services, fire prevention and suppression services, park and recreation facilities, and general improvements throughout the City, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax on oil producing businesses of $1.44 per barrel of oil produced in the City of Los Angeles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6151, "fingerprint": "2011|201100020|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100020|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "38c77e560e24faa0", "measure_id": "201100020", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be approved which requires franchises for providing solid waste (trash) hauling services to be awarded through a competitive bidding process requiring a public hearing and other compliance requirements to ensure fairness and transparency?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3039, "no_votes": 1236, "total_votes": 4275, "percent_yes": 71.0877, "percent_no": 28.912300000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Environment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gasoline Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance requires solid waste hauling service franchises to be awarded ...", "summary_text": "This ordinance requires solid waste hauling service franchises to be awarded through a competitive bidding process with public hearings and compliance requirements for fairness and transparency.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11464, "fingerprint": "2011|201100104|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100104|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1a9be3eae46b0f4f", "measure_id": "201100104", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to establish term limits for members of the City Council limiting them to two (2), four (4) year consecutive terms, with a hiatus of two (2) years before being eligible to hold office again as a member of the City Council", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1794, "no_votes": 568, "total_votes": 2362, "percent_yes": 75.9526, "percent_no": 24.047399999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.103681", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.296562", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.088515", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to establish term limits for members of the City Council limiting them to two (2), four (4) year consecutive terms, with a hiatus of two (2) years before being eligible to hold office again as a member of the City Council", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6152, "fingerprint": "2011|201100023|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100023|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "280ac48884251fbb", "measure_id": "201100023", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to establish term limits for members of the City Council limiting them to two (2), four (4) year consecutive terms, with a hiatus of two (2) years before being eligible to hold office again as a member of the City Council", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1794, "no_votes": 568, "total_votes": 2362, "percent_yes": 75.9526, "percent_no": 24.047399999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established term limits for Los Angeles City Council members, re...", "summary_text": "This measure established term limits for Los Angeles City Council members, restricting them to two consecutive four-year terms with a required two-year break before they can serve on the council again.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11465, "fingerprint": "2011|201100105|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100105|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9c19051fa0bd0770", "measure_id": "201100105", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted as submitted by initiative petition to amend the City's business license tax ordinance by modifying the amount of business license tax on restaurants and bars in order to increase tax revenue to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 610, "no_votes": 2128, "total_votes": 2738, "percent_yes": 22.279, "percent_no": 77.721, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "I", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.103870", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.296836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.088699", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted as submitted by initiative petition to amend the City's business license tax ordinance by modifying the amount of business license tax on restaurants and bars in order to increase tax revenue to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6153, "fingerprint": "2011|201100024|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100024|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "267921a34eb93975", "measure_id": "201100024", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted as submitted by initiative petition to amend the City's business license tax ordinance by modifying the amount of business license tax on restaurants and bars in order to increase tax revenue to the City?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 610, "no_votes": 2128, "total_votes": 2738, "percent_yes": 22.279, "percent_no": 77.721, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Elections", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11466, "fingerprint": "2011|201100106|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100106|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d7063d21e13bc441", "measure_id": "201100106", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to continue a Special Public Safety Tax for Paramedic Services, Fire Protection and Prevention and Police Protection in the City of San Marino?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1794, "no_votes": 651, "total_votes": 2445, "percent_yes": 73.3742, "percent_no": 26.625799999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.104057", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.297121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.088881", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to continue a Special Public Safety Tax for Paramedic Services, Fire Protection and Prevention and Police Protection in the City of San Marino?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6155, "fingerprint": "2011|201100032|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100032|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d6db11778b541eea", "measure_id": "201100032", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to continue a Special Public Safety Tax for Paramedic Services, Fire Protection and Prevention and Police Protection in the City of San Marino?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1794, "no_votes": 651, "total_votes": 2445, "percent_yes": 73.3742, "percent_no": 26.625799999999998, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would continue a special tax in San Marino to fund paramedic ser...", "summary_text": "This measure would continue a special tax in San Marino to fund paramedic services, fire protection and prevention, and police protection services. The measure seeks to extend an existing public safety tax rather than create a new one.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-04-05", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11467, "fingerprint": "2011|201100107|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100107|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "12d797dc1103e206", "measure_id": "201100107", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of City Treasurer of the City of Maywood be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 505, "no_votes": 773, "total_votes": 1278, "percent_yes": 39.5149, "percent_no": 60.4851, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.104245", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.297402", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.089065", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of City Treasurer of the City of Maywood be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6154, "fingerprint": "2011|201100025|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100025|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "930f019359c170f2", "measure_id": "201100025", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Office of City Treasurer of the City of Maywood be appointive?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 505, "no_votes": 773, "total_votes": 1278, "percent_yes": 39.5149, "percent_no": 60.4851, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6156, "fingerprint": "2011|201100034|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100034|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f646d4c3aeaa0942", "measure_id": "201100034", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of Burbank to help preserve funding for essential City services including public safety, parks, libraries, and youth and senior programs by modernizing the Utility Users\u2019 Tax provisions of the Burbank Municipal Code, where it does not raise the current tax rate, but instead updates the language to incorporate existing and emerging technologies so that all taxpayers are treated the same regardless of the technology used?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5270, "no_votes": 2562, "total_votes": 7832, "percent_yes": 67.288, "percent_no": 32.712, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure updated Burbank's Utility Users' Tax language to include new and...", "summary_text": "This measure updated Burbank's Utility Users' Tax language to include new and emerging technologies while maintaining the same tax rate. The changes were intended to ensure equal tax treatment across different types of utility technologies and preserve funding for city services.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-04-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.482695", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6161, "fingerprint": "2011|201100108|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100108|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3113a0ab7c6fa73a", "measure_id": "201100108", "measure_letter": "UT", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Los Angeles Measure UT", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To offset state cuts and provide vital city services, shall an ordinance be adopted to extend and reduce the South Pasadena Utility User's Tax from 8% to 7.5% to maintain police patrols, fire, paramedics and 9-1-1 emergency services and safety equipment; fix potholes; repair streets and sidewalks; maintain senior meals and services; and other essential city services, requiring equal taxpayer treatment, annual audits, with no funds for Sacramento, with the entire tax expiring in 10 years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2463, "no_votes": 2104, "total_votes": 4567, "percent_yes": 53.9304, "percent_no": 46.0696, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended South Pasadena's Utility User's Tax for 10 years while ...", "summary_text": "This measure extended South Pasadena's Utility User's Tax for 10 years while reducing the rate from 8% to 7.5%. The tax revenue would fund city services including police, fire, emergency services, street repairs, and senior services, with annual audits required and no funds going to the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.482778", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Los Angeles Measure UT", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11474, "fingerprint": "2011|201100109|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100109|MARIN", "content_hash": "249b17eb3af85dc1", "measure_id": "201100109", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding in the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District by reopening the San Clemente School site; make essential fire and earthquake safety upgrades to existing facilities; improve access for the disabled; repair or replace outdated heating, ventilation and electrical systems; and enhance classroom technology infrastructure, shall the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District be authorized to issue up to twenty-six million dollars in bonds and establish a citizens' oversight committee to ensure all expenditures are made according to approved plans?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3243, "no_votes": 1331, "total_votes": 4574, "percent_yes": 70.9007, "percent_no": 29.0993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.106239", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:09.333579", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.090698", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding in the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District by reopening the San Clemente School site; make essential fire and earthquake safety upgrades to existing facilities; improve access for the disabled; repair or replace outdated heating, ventilation and electrical systems; and enhance classroom technology infrastructure, shall the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District be authorized to issue up to twenty-six million dollars in bonds and establish a citizens' oversight committee to ensure all expenditures are made according to approved plans?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6162, "fingerprint": "2011|201100039|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100039|MARIN", "content_hash": "4de2eef10fe2dc02", "measure_id": "201100039", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Marin Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To relieve overcrowding in the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District by reopening the San Clemente School site; make essential fire and earthquake safety upgrades to existing facilities; improve access for the disabled; repair or replace outdated heating, ventilation and electrical systems; and enhance classroom technology infrastructure, shall the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District be authorized to issue up to twenty-six million dollars in bonds and establish a citizens' oversight committee to ensure all expenditures are made according to approved plans?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3243, "no_votes": 1331, "total_votes": 4574, "percent_yes": 70.9007, "percent_no": 29.0993, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District to issue up to $26 million in bonds to reopen the San Clemente School site, upgrade safety and accessibility features at existing facilities, and improve heating, ventilation, electrical and technology systems. The measure would also establish a citizens' oversight committee to monitor how the bond funds are spent.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Marin Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6163, "fingerprint": "2011|201100110|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100110|MARIN", "content_hash": "b6961f80759ff0d1", "measure_id": "201100110", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Marin Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain quality public high school education including small class sizes and exceptional instructional programs in Belvedere, Bolinas, Corte Madera, Fairfax, Greenbrae, Kentfield, Larkspur, Marin City, Mill Valley, Nicasio, Ross, San Anselmo, San Geronimo, Sausalito, Stinson Beach, and Tiburon, shall Tamalpais Union High School District be authorized to renew a parcel tax for ten years commencing July 1, 2012, at the current rate plus an annual 3% increase ($245.94 + tax year 2012-2013), with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 and older?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22146, "no_votes": 8040, "total_votes": 30186, "percent_yes": 73.36510000000001, "percent_no": 26.634899999999988, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Tamalpais Union High School District to rene...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Tamalpais Union High School District to renew a parcel tax for ten years starting July 1, 2012, at the current rate with annual 3% increases beginning at $245.94 in tax year 2012-2013. The tax would include an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 and older.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483018", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Marin Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6164, "fingerprint": "2011|201100111|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100111|MARIN", "content_hash": "6ffb8fe5bd8ac9dd", "measure_id": "201100111", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Marin Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "In order to continue existing emergency services in the Town of Corte Madera, shall there be a continuation of the special tax for paramedic and/or emergency medical services for four more years at the annual amount of $60.00 per residence and per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal year 2011-2012, increasing a maximum of $5.00 yearly, if needed, with the appropriations limit increasing by the amount of said tax?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2540, "no_votes": 539, "total_votes": 3079, "percent_yes": 82.4943, "percent_no": 17.505700000000004, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would continue a special tax in Corte Madera for four more years...", "summary_text": "This measure would continue a special tax in Corte Madera for four more years to fund paramedic and emergency medical services, charging $60 annually per residence and per 1,000 square feet for non-residential properties, with potential yearly increases of up to $5 if needed.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483096", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Marin Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6165, "fingerprint": "2011|201100112|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100112|MARIN", "content_hash": "6f2a85bc5bea4dd1", "measure_id": "201100112", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Marin Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To offset declining property tax revenues and severe state budget cuts and to prevent further cuts to general Town services, shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a one-half cent transaction and use tax in the Town of Fairfax, subject to annual independent audits, public expenditure reports, local use of all funds, and expiration on March 31, 2017?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1568, "no_votes": 829, "total_votes": 2397, "percent_yes": 65.41510000000001, "percent_no": 34.58489999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.5% sales tax in the Town of Fairfax to fund general municipal services, with the tax set to expire on March 31, 2017. The measure included provisions for annual audits, public expenditure reports, and required all funds to be used locally.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483176", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Marin Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6166, "fingerprint": "2011|201100113|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100113|MARIN", "content_hash": "ceb06e254837c407", "measure_id": "201100113", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Marin Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the existing special tax for paramedic services be increased from $85.00 to a maximum of $95.00 per year for each living unit, and from 11 cents to a maximum of 13.2 cents per square foot of structure for each non-residential structure? These increases will be phased in over four years.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 367, "no_votes": 107, "total_votes": 474, "percent_yes": 77.4262, "percent_no": 22.573800000000006, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would increase the existing special tax for paramedic services i...", "summary_text": "This measure would increase the existing special tax for paramedic services in Marin County from $85 to a maximum of $95 per year for residential units and from 11 cents to 13.2 cents per square foot for non-residential structures. The increases would be implemented gradually over a four-year period.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483255", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Marin Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6167, "fingerprint": "2011|201100114|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100114|MARIN", "content_hash": "98fe121c1f5b1671", "measure_id": "201100114", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Marin Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the existing special tax for paramedic services be increased from $85.00 to a maximum of $95.00 per year for each living unit, and from 11 cents to a maximum of 13.2 cents per square foot of structure for each non-residential structure? These increases will be phased in over four years.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 947, "no_votes": 331, "total_votes": 1278, "percent_yes": 74.1002, "percent_no": 25.8998, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would increase Marin's special tax for paramedic services from $...", "summary_text": "This measure would increase Marin's special tax for paramedic services from $85 to a maximum of $95 per year for residential units and from 11 cents to 13.2 cents per square foot for non-residential structures. The increases would be implemented gradually over four years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483336", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Marin Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6168, "fingerprint": "2011|201100115|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100115|MARIN", "content_hash": "959502fd7ce0f0eb", "measure_id": "201100115", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Marin Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain current fire protection services, shall Resolution No. 2011-06 be approved increasing the Special Tax for Fire Protection Service by 10 cents to a maximum of 28 cents per square foot of living or working area, and by $30 to a maximum of $90 per acre of unimproved lands, with annual cost of living adjustments consistent with CPI, and the appropriation limit increased by the amount of said tax?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 888, "no_votes": 436, "total_votes": 1324, "percent_yes": 67.0695, "percent_no": 32.930499999999995, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would increase Marin's special tax for fire protection services ...", "summary_text": "This measure would increase Marin's special tax for fire protection services by 10 cents per square foot of living or working area (to a maximum of 28 cents) and by $30 per acre for unimproved lands (to a maximum of $90), with annual cost of living adjustments. It would also increase the appropriation limit by the amount of the tax increase.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483417", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Marin Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6169, "fingerprint": "2011|201100067|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100067|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "acf1562c9470e695", "measure_id": "201100067", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Mendocino Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Riboli be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92, "no_votes": 58, "total_votes": 150, "percent_yes": 61.3333, "percent_no": 38.6667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall and remove Riboli from the...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall and remove Riboli from their position as a City Councilmember in Mendocino. The measure passed, resulting in Riboli's removal from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-08-30", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483496", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Mendocino Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6170, "fingerprint": "2011|201100068|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100068|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "7a2dadc77f152239", "measure_id": "201100068", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Mendocino Measure 2", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Oropeza be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75, "no_votes": 73, "total_votes": 148, "percent_yes": 50.6757, "percent_no": 49.3243, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Oropeza from their posit...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Oropeza from their position as a City Councilmember in Mendocino. The recall passed, resulting in Oropeza's removal from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-08-30", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483584", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Mendocino Measure 2", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6171, "fingerprint": "2011|201100069|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100069|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "d9fd15999f93e062", "measure_id": "201100069", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Mendocino Measure 3", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Sinnott be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 98, "no_votes": 52, "total_votes": 150, "percent_yes": 65.33330000000001, "percent_no": 34.66669999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Sinnott from thei...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure asked voters whether to recall (remove) Sinnott from their position as a City Councilmember in Mendocino, California. The recall passed, resulting in Sinnott's removal from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-08-30", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483668", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Mendocino Measure 3", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6172, "fingerprint": "2011|201100070|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100070|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "18fa478cb4fe8082", "measure_id": "201100070", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Mendocino Measure 4", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ingham be recalled (removed) from the office of City Councilmember?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 85, "no_votes": 63, "total_votes": 148, "percent_yes": 57.432399999999994, "percent_no": 42.567600000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure asked voters whether to recall and remove Ingham from their posi...", "summary_text": "This measure asked voters whether to recall and remove Ingham from their position as City Councilmember in Mendocino. The recall passed, resulting in Ingham's removal from office.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-08-30", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483748", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Mendocino Measure 4", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6173, "fingerprint": "2011|201100116|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100116|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "43fa78c5eb7d672e", "measure_id": "201100116", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Mendocino Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance titled \"Library Special Transactions And Use Tax\" be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15000, "no_votes": 4825, "total_votes": 19825, "percent_yes": 75.66199999999999, "percent_no": 24.338000000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure approved a special transactions and use tax in Mendocino County ...", "summary_text": "This measure approved a special transactions and use tax in Mendocino County to fund library services. The tax passed with 50.8% of the vote in 2011.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483830", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Mendocino Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6174, "fingerprint": "2011|201100117|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100117|MONO", "content_hash": "beb8d0bb99c57dd3", "measure_id": "201100117", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Mono Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect our local schools from ongoing state budget cuts and to maintain high quality academic programs by preserving smaller classes, attracting and retaining excellent teachers, strengthening core curriculum, and enhancing technology, art, music and athletics, shall Mammoth Unified School District extend the current $59 annual education parcel tax for five years with an exemption for senior citizens' primary residences, overseen by an independent citizen's oversight committee, and every dollar spent on Mammoth Schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1213, "no_votes": 399, "total_votes": 1612, "percent_yes": 75.2481, "percent_no": 24.751900000000006, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would extend an existing $59 annual parcel tax for the Mammoth U...", "summary_text": "This measure would extend an existing $59 annual parcel tax for the Mammoth Unified School District for five years, with an exemption for senior citizens' primary residences and oversight by an independent citizen committee.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483912", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Mono Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6175, "fingerprint": "2011|201100118|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100118|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "4a16ac5a55311a53", "measure_id": "201100118", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Monterey Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the existing one percent (1%) Transactions and Use Tax be re-authorized and extended for a period of not more than five (5) years, unless terminated sooner by the City Council or unless extension or re-authorization is approved by the voters of the City at an election called for that purpose, the proceeds of said tax to be utilized for general purposes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 323, "no_votes": 54, "total_votes": 377, "percent_yes": 85.6764, "percent_no": 14.323599999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Elections", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure re-authorized and extended Monterey's existing 1% transactions a...", "summary_text": "This measure re-authorized and extended Monterey's existing 1% transactions and use tax for up to five years, with proceeds to be used for general city purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.483991", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Monterey Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6176, "fingerprint": "2011|201100119|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100119|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "1c5a87208dbc5cd7", "measure_id": "201100119", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Monterey Measure T", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education at Bradley School, make health and safety improvements; modernize classrooms and restrooms; repair leaky roofs; improve student access to computers and modern technology; upgrade outdated electrical systems; and replace old heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems, shall the Bradley Union Elementary School District issue $1,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries to be taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33, "no_votes": 21, "total_votes": 54, "percent_yes": 61.11109999999999, "percent_no": 38.88890000000001, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Bradley Union Elementary School District to ...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Bradley Union Elementary School District to issue $1.1 million in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and restroom modernization, roof repairs, technology upgrades, and electrical and HVAC system replacements. The measure includes provisions for independent oversight and prohibits use of funds for administrative or teacher salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484072", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Monterey Measure T", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6177, "fingerprint": "2011|201100120|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100120|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c219840555e9e558", "measure_id": "201100120", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Monterey Measure U", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Chapter 23.52 of the Pacific Grove municipal Code be amended to allow not more than 79 (total) additional motel guest units and ease guest unit restrictions that existed prior to voter approval of measure C in 1986?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2804, "no_votes": 1053, "total_votes": 3857, "percent_yes": 72.699, "percent_no": 27.301000000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Pacific Grove's municipal code to allow up to 79 additio...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Pacific Grove's municipal code to allow up to 79 additional motel guest units and relaxed guest unit restrictions that had been in place since voters approved Measure C in 1986.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484157", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Monterey Measure U", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6178, "fingerprint": "2011|201100121|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100121|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "959db188455b0228", "measure_id": "201100121", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Monterey Measure V", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve the educational quality of our schools in the face of Statewide budget cuts, including but not limited to science, math, music, art, computers and libraries; maintain small class sized; and retain qualified teachers; shall Pacific Grove Unified School District levy $60 per parcel for four years to replace and extend the previously approved tax, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, and all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2972, "no_votes": 1789, "total_votes": 4761, "percent_yes": 62.423899999999996, "percent_no": 37.576100000000004, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize Pacific Grove Unified School District to levy a ...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize Pacific Grove Unified School District to levy a $60 per parcel tax for four years to fund educational programs and maintain smaller class sizes. The measure would replace and extend a previously approved parcel tax, with funds overseen by a citizens' committee and restricted from being used for administrative salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484240", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Monterey Measure V", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6179, "fingerprint": "2011|201100026|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100026|NEVADA", "content_hash": "c1091679023fb795", "measure_id": "201100026", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Nevada Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To reduce the impact of budget cuts and ensure all students receive a high quality education by preventing reductions in science, music, art, technology, physical education, college preparation, honors/advanced placement classes and vocational education, retaining librarians, counselors and nurses, and maintaining funding for school equipment and supplies, shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District renew its expiring parcel tax for 7 years, at 135 dollars per year, with senior exemptions, citizens oversight, and annual audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2784, "no_votes": 1210, "total_votes": 3994, "percent_yes": 69.7046, "percent_no": 30.2954, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would renew an expiring $135 annual parcel tax for the Tahoe Tru...", "summary_text": "This measure would renew an expiring $135 annual parcel tax for the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District for 7 years to maintain funding for various educational programs, staff positions, and school resources. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and requires citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484319", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Nevada Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6180, "fingerprint": "2011|201100027|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100027|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3cff3cd6ca01aea7", "measure_id": "201100027", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Orange Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Resolution No. 10-53 approving the Playa del Norte commercial development project in the City's North Beach area be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7624, "no_votes": 10170, "total_votes": 17794, "percent_yes": 42.8459, "percent_no": 57.1541, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Land Use", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484403", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Orange Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6181, "fingerprint": "2011|201100057|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100057|ORANGE", "content_hash": "76950490342a1049", "measure_id": "201100057", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Orange Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Resolution 10-11-02-02 approving a general plan amendment redesignating the 9.1 acre westerly portion of the Distrito La Novia site from \"Specific Plan\" to \"Planned Community\" and establishing land uses for the 153.8 acre Distrito La Novia-San Juan Meadows Planned Community located east of Valle Road at 7% general commercial, 3% high density residential, 44% open space recreation, 28% low density residential, and 18% natural open space, be approved?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3723, "no_votes": 2946, "total_votes": 6669, "percent_yes": 55.82549999999999, "percent_no": 44.17450000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Transportation", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure approved a general plan amendment that redesignated 9", "summary_text": "This measure approved a general plan amendment that redesignated 9.1 acres of the Distrito La Novia site from \"Specific Plan\" to \"Planned Community\" and established specific land use allocations for the 153.8-acre Distrito La Novia-San Juan Meadows Planned Community, including percentages for commercial, residential, recreational, and open space uses.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484482", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Orange Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6182, "fingerprint": "2011|201100028|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100028|PLACER", "content_hash": "57627208206b2826", "measure_id": "201100028", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Placer Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To reduce the impact of budget cuts and ensure all students receive a high quality education by preventing reductions in science, music, art, technology, physical education, college preparation, honors/advanced placement classes and vocational education, retaining librarians, counselors and nurses, and maintaining funding for school equipment and supplies, shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District renew its expiring parcel tax for 7 years, at 135 dollars per year, with senior exemptions, citizens oversight, and annual audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1911, "no_votes": 928, "total_votes": 2839, "percent_yes": 67.3124, "percent_no": 32.6876, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would renew an expiring parcel tax of $135 per year for 7 years ...", "summary_text": "This measure would renew an expiring parcel tax of $135 per year for 7 years to fund various educational programs and staff positions in the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District. The tax would include exemptions for seniors and require citizen oversight and annual audits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484563", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Placer Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6183, "fingerprint": "2011|201100122|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100122|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "768c176ba0ca3b4d", "measure_id": "201100122", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Plumas Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Upon a two-thirds vote of approval, shall a special tax, replacing the current special tax of $90.00 which will expire on June 30, 2012, be imposed for an indefinite period starting July 1, 2012 for the specific purpose of emergency medical response, fire protection and prevention and hazardous materials response; and shall this tax be authorized in the amount of $200.00 per year on each parcel of real property or condominium unit within the District, excluding those parcels exempt from property tax and the following parcel numbers: 108-010-004, 108-101-008, 108-101-015, 108-010-016, 108-010-017, 108-010-021, 108-010-023, 108-053-006, 108-053-007, 108-090-002, 108-141-001, 108-211-008, 108-283-004, 108-232-001, 108-241-003 and 108-320-035, said tax will be collected along with the Plumas County property taxes and shall the District appropriations limit (spending limit) be raised by the amount of the annual proceeds from this special tax for the period this tax is in effect, which revenue shall be deposited into a specifically created account on which an annual report shall be made as required by Government Code Section 50075.3?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 122, "no_votes": 64, "total_votes": 186, "percent_yes": 65.5914, "percent_no": 34.40860000000001, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would replace an expiring $90 annual special tax with a n...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would replace an expiring $90 annual special tax with a new $200 annual special tax on most parcels in the district to fund emergency medical response, fire protection and prevention, and hazardous materials response. The tax would run indefinitely starting July 1, 2012, and would also raise the district's spending limit by the amount of tax revenue collected.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484642", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Plumas Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6184, "fingerprint": "2011|201100029|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100029|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ddc51e03072115ca", "measure_id": "201100029", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Riverside Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the order adopted on July 22, 2010, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order, including detachment from the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District, dissolution of County Service Areas 72 and 73, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order designated as LAFCO 2009-32-2 (Resolution No. 12-10) be confirmed?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3605, "no_votes": 3067, "total_votes": 6672, "percent_yes": 54.0318, "percent_no": 45.9682, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Environment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would confirm the incorporation of a new city in Riverside Count...", "summary_text": "This measure would confirm the incorporation of a new city in Riverside County as previously ordered by the Local Agency Formation Commission, which would also detach the territory from a county waste management district and dissolve two existing county service areas.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484719", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Riverside Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6185, "fingerprint": "2011|201100030|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100030|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "78cd1b7e25d893f2", "measure_id": "201100030", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Riverside Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall members of the city council in future elections be elected by districts, from districts, or at large?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2474, "no_votes": 3383, "total_votes": 5857, "percent_yes": 42.240100000000005, "percent_no": 57.759899999999995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484823", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Riverside Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6186, "fingerprint": "2011|201100058|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100058|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7c6044a7b08c061d", "measure_id": "201100058", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Riverside Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance proposing adoption of a specific plan for commercial development of approximately 30 acres of undeveloped property located near the northwesterly portion of the interstate 215 interchange with Scott Road, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8406, "no_votes": 2592, "total_votes": 10998, "percent_yes": 76.4321, "percent_no": 23.567899999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Transportation", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure adopts a specific plan for commercial development of approximatel...", "summary_text": "The measure adopts a specific plan for commercial development of approximately 30 acres of undeveloped property near the Interstate 215 interchange with Scott Road in northwestern Riverside.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484905", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Riverside Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6187, "fingerprint": "2011|201100059|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100059|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4bb62acc95385c5f", "measure_id": "201100059", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Riverside Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Community Facilities District 2011-1 (Wildomar Parks) of the City of Wildomar be formed and authorized to levy a Special Tax at a maximum rate of $28 per benefit unit to provide park maintenance services?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2332, "no_votes": 1828, "total_votes": 4160, "percent_yes": 56.0577, "percent_no": 43.9423, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Environment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would create Community Facilities District 2011-1 in Wildomar to...", "summary_text": "This measure would create Community Facilities District 2011-1 in Wildomar to levy a special tax of up to $28 per benefit unit for park maintenance services. The district would be authorized to collect these funds specifically for maintaining parks within the designated area.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.484983", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Riverside Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6188, "fingerprint": "2011|201100060|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100060|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e2248b96089701e0", "measure_id": "201100060", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Riverside Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 133 enacting a special parcel tax to fund the continuation of existing police and fire protection services in the City of Canyon Lake be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 777, "no_votes": 1274, "total_votes": 2051, "percent_yes": 37.884, "percent_no": 62.116, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would enact a special parcel tax in Canyon Lake to fund the cont...", "summary_text": "This measure would enact a special parcel tax in Canyon Lake to fund the continuation of existing police and fire protection services. The tax would be imposed on property parcels within the city limits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485060", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Riverside Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6189, "fingerprint": "2011|201100123|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100123|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "5be8a01c78d034c0", "measure_id": "201100123", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Riverside Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance Bill No. 2011-05 be adopted to approve an increase in the City's Transient Occupancy Tax from the current rate of nine and one-quarter percent (9.25%) to a rate of eleven and one-quarter percent (11.25%)?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 857, "no_votes": 455, "total_votes": 1312, "percent_yes": 65.3201, "percent_no": 34.6799, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Riverside's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 9", "summary_text": "This measure increased Riverside's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 9.25% to 11.25%, adding a 2 percentage point increase to the rate paid by hotel guests.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485140", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Riverside Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6190, "fingerprint": "2011|201100124|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100124|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c94d889178e0d178", "measure_id": "201100124", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Riverside Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Should library services for all City of Riverside residents including children, teens, adults, and seniors, be continued without a tax increase, to preserve after-school programs, retain librarians, provide homework assistance and reading programs for seniors, and materials for the hearing and vision impaired, by continuing the $19 annual library parcel tax, for ten years, with annual audits, and all funds spent locally on library services, with no money taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17495, "no_votes": 3080, "total_votes": 20575, "percent_yes": 85.0304, "percent_no": 14.9696, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would continue an existing $19 annual parcel tax for ten years to...", "summary_text": "The measure would continue an existing $19 annual parcel tax for ten years to fund Riverside library services including after-school programs, librarian positions, homework assistance, reading programs, and materials for hearing and vision impaired residents. The tax would remain at the current rate without an increase and would require annual audits with funds spent locally on library services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485226", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Riverside Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6191, "fingerprint": "2011|201100125|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100125|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e9fe29f4225106ec", "measure_id": "201100125", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Riverside Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance to provide funding that cannot be taken by the State and help preserve Palm Springs' city services, including without limitation police, fire, library, parks, streets/pothole repair, acquisition and development of garages and parking facilities, installation and maintenance of improvements and facilities for the implementation of the Museum Market Plaza Specific Plan, by enacting a City of Palm Springs 1% sales and use tax, for 25 years, subject to independent annual audits, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6550, "no_votes": 4845, "total_votes": 11395, "percent_yes": 57.48140000000001, "percent_no": 42.51859999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure enacted a 1% sales and use tax in Palm Springs for 25 years to fu...", "summary_text": "The measure enacted a 1% sales and use tax in Palm Springs for 25 years to fund city services including police, fire, library, parks, street repairs, parking facilities, and improvements related to the Museum Market Plaza Specific Plan. The tax revenue cannot be taken by the state and is subject to independent annual audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485314", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Riverside Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6192, "fingerprint": "2011|201100126|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100126|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "311b1a8fb6908b78", "measure_id": "201100126", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Riverside Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the ordinance adding Chapter 4.26 to the City Code to approve a 1/2 percent sales and use tax, in order to continue funding general municipal services, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 806, "no_votes": 291, "total_votes": 1097, "percent_yes": 73.4731, "percent_no": 26.526899999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance added a 0", "summary_text": "This ordinance added a 0.5% sales and use tax to fund general municipal services in Riverside, California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485402", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Riverside Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6193, "fingerprint": "2011|201100127|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100127|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4cc3450a32ed65df", "measure_id": "201100127", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Riverside Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) If the City's Sales and Use Tax is increased by 0.5%, should the City solely allocate the additional revenue towards purchasing and constructing park and recreational facilities and providing related park and recreational services, and prohibit the additional revenue from being used for general City operations?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 557, "no_votes": 534, "total_votes": 1091, "percent_yes": 51.054100000000005, "percent_no": 48.945899999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": "Environment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485480", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Riverside Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6194, "fingerprint": "2011|201100061|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100061|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "f85309efdc2f1165", "measure_id": "201100061", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Benito Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and improve academic programs including reading, writing, science and math; improve student access to computer labs and technology; help keep school libraries open and minimize future classroom overcrowding; shall Hollister School District levy $96 per parcel annually for four years (see voter pamphlet) with senior exemptions, no money for administrators' salaries, independent community oversight, and all funds used for neighborhood schools and not taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2724, "no_votes": 2539, "total_votes": 5263, "percent_yes": 51.757600000000004, "percent_no": 48.242399999999996, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Hollister School District to levy a $96 annu...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Hollister School District to levy a $96 annual parcel tax for four years to fund academic programs, technology access, school libraries, and classroom capacity. The tax includes exemptions for seniors and restrictions preventing funds from being used for administrator salaries or being redirected by the state.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485565", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Benito Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6196, "fingerprint": "2011|201100071|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100071|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "5dee008faaf0fcd6", "measure_id": "201100071", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Bernardino Measure 1", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Shall the mailed ballot be used to conduct all future general district elections?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1910, "no_votes": 147, "total_votes": 2057, "percent_yes": 92.85369999999999, "percent_no": 7.146300000000011, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": "Elections", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked San Bernardino voters whether the district should...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked San Bernardino voters whether the district should conduct all future general elections using mailed ballots rather than traditional polling place voting. The measure passed with 50.9% of the vote, providing non-binding guidance to election officials on the preferred voting method.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-08-30", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485646", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Bernardino Measure 1", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6195, "fingerprint": "2011|201100064|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100064|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "5bd4185c9d205d6b", "measure_id": "201100064", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Bernardino Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and improve academic programs including reading, writing, science and math; improve student access to computer labs and technology; retain teachers and counselors; help keep school libraries open and minimize future classroom overcrowding; shall Fontana Unified School District levy $96 per parcel annually for four years (see voter pamphlet) with senior exemptions, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, independent community oversight, and all funds used for neighborhood schools and not taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4153, "no_votes": 3820, "total_votes": 7973, "percent_yes": 52.0883, "percent_no": 47.9117, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize Fontana Unified School District to levy a $96 an...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize Fontana Unified School District to levy a $96 annual parcel tax for four years to fund academic programs, technology, staffing, libraries, and classroom capacity. The tax would include exemptions for seniors and prohibit use of funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-21", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485732", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Bernardino Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6197, "fingerprint": "2011|201100128|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100128|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b559a104a94cd905", "measure_id": "201100128", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Francisco Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall San Francisco Unified School District repair and rehabilitate facilities to current accessibility, health, safety and instructional standards, replace worn out plumbing, electrical and other major building systems, replace aging heating, ventilation and air handling systems, renovate outdated classrooms and training facilities, construct facilities to replace aging modular classrooms, by issuing bonds in an amount not to exceed $531,000,000, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight and no money for school administrators' salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134695, "no_votes": 54750, "total_votes": 189445, "percent_yes": 71.0998, "percent_no": 28.900199999999998, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the San Francisco Unified School District to iss...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the San Francisco Unified School District to issue up to $531 million in bonds to repair and upgrade school facilities, including building systems, classrooms, and accessibility improvements. The bonds would fund infrastructure repairs and renovations to bring facilities up to current health, safety, and instructional standards.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485816", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Francisco Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6198, "fingerprint": "2011|201100129|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100129|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d02c7d405d300fc5", "measure_id": "201100129", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Francisco Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To fix potholes and repave deteriorating streets in neighborhoods throughout San Francisco, repair and strengthen deteriorating stairways, bridges and overpasses, improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists, improve disabled access to sidewalks, and construct and renovate traffic infrastructure to improve Municipal Transportation Agency transit reliability and traffic flow on local streets, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $248,000,000 in general obligation bonds subject to independent oversight and regular audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 129123, "no_votes": 60733, "total_votes": 189856, "percent_yes": 68.011, "percent_no": 31.989000000000004, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Transportation", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would authorize San Francisco to issue $248 million in ge...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would authorize San Francisco to issue $248 million in general obligation bonds to fund street repairs, infrastructure improvements for pedestrians and cyclists, and transit-related construction projects. The bond funding would be subject to independent oversight and regular audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485899", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Francisco Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6199, "fingerprint": "2011|201100130|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100130|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3e3a1fea3d105994", "measure_id": "201100130", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Francisco Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend its Charter to adjust pension contribution rates for most current and future City employees based on the City's costs; reduce pension benefits for future City employees; limit cost-of-living adjustments to pension benefits; decrease City contributions to retiree health care costs for certain former employees; require all current and future employees to contribute toward their retiree health care costs; change the composition and voting requirements of the Health Service Board; and make other changes to the City's retirement and health benefits systems?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 129511, "no_votes": 58445, "total_votes": 187956, "percent_yes": 68.905, "percent_no": 31.095, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Healthcare", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment adjusted pension contribution rates based on city cost...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment adjusted pension contribution rates based on city costs, reduced pension benefits for future employees, limited cost-of-living adjustments, and required all employees to contribute toward retiree health care costs. It also decreased city contributions to retiree health care for certain former employees and changed the composition and voting requirements of the Health Service Board.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.485977", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Francisco Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6200, "fingerprint": "2011|201100131|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100131|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3ff3abb0e22ebb3b", "measure_id": "201100131", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Francisco Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend its Charter to increase pension contribution rates for most current City employees based on the City's costs; reduce contribution rates and pension benefits for most future City employees; limit cost-of-living adjustments to pension benefits; prohibit the City from picking up any employee's contribution for pension benefits; and make other changes to the City's retirement system?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 124002, "no_votes": 62349, "total_votes": 186351, "percent_yes": 66.5422, "percent_no": 33.457800000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Labor & Employment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment increased pension contribution rates for most current ...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment increased pension contribution rates for most current San Francisco city employees while reducing both contribution rates and pension benefits for future employees. It also limited cost-of-living adjustments to pension benefits and prohibited the city from paying employees' pension contributions on their behalf.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486058", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Francisco Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6201, "fingerprint": "2011|201100132|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100132|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "c09a6f9bc8d584cd", "measure_id": "201100132", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Francisco Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend its Charter to allow the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor to amend or repeal initiative ordinances and declarations of policy that the Board of Supervisors or the Mayor place on the ballot and that the voters approve after January 1, 2012?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59356, "no_votes": 121202, "total_votes": 180558, "percent_yes": 32.873599999999996, "percent_no": 67.1264, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Elections", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed San Francisco's Board of Supervisors and Mayo...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed San Francisco's Board of Supervisors and Mayor to amend or repeal voter-approved ballot initiatives that were originally placed on the ballot by those same city officials, rather than by citizen petition, for measures approved after January 1, 2012.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486136", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Francisco Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6202, "fingerprint": "2011|201100133|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100133|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "e1c13cefd0371f98", "measure_id": "201100133", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Francisco Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City amend its campaign consultant ordinance to redefine \"campaign consultant;\" require campaign consultants to file monthly reports; authorize the City's Ethics Commission to require electronic filing instead of paper reports; change the calculation of City fees campaign consultants must pay; and allow the City to change any of the ordinance's requirements without further voter approval while still permitting voters to make additional changes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 77240, "no_votes": 98761, "total_votes": 176001, "percent_yes": 43.8861, "percent_no": 56.1139, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Elections", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have redefined \"campaign consultant,\" required monthly rath...", "summary_text": "The measure would have redefined \"campaign consultant,\" required monthly rather than current reporting schedules, authorized electronic filing, changed fee calculations, and allowed the City to modify ordinance requirements without voter approval while preserving voters' ability to make additional changes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486219", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Francisco Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6203, "fingerprint": "2011|201100134|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100134|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "74992d0cc4a65b12", "measure_id": "201100134", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Francisco Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City increase its local sales tax by 0.50% for up to 10 years to fund public safety programs and programs for children and seniors, unless the State increases its sales tax by either 1.0% before November 30, 2011 or 0.75% before January 1, 2016?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86033, "no_votes": 100490, "total_votes": 186523, "percent_yes": 46.1246, "percent_no": 53.8754, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would increase San Francisco's local sales tax by 0", "summary_text": "This measure would increase San Francisco's local sales tax by 0.50% for up to 10 years to fund public safety programs and programs for children and seniors. The tax increase would be canceled if California increased its state sales tax by 1.0% before November 30, 2011, or by 0.75% before January 1, 2016.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486303", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Francisco Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6204, "fingerprint": "2011|201100135|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100135|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "dd0d136c98e7598d", "measure_id": "201100135", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Francisco Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall it be City policy to encourage the San Francisco Unified School District to change its student assignment system so that it places the highest priority on assigning each student to the school closest to home, after placing siblings in the same school?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91514, "no_votes": 91629, "total_votes": 183143, "percent_yes": 49.9686, "percent_no": 50.0314, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established city policy encouraging the San Francisco...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established city policy encouraging the San Francisco Unified School District to prioritize assigning students to their neighborhood school closest to home, with sibling placement taking precedence.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486381", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Francisco Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6205, "fingerprint": "2011|201100072|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100072|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "44de64c45a7d8f38", "measure_id": "201100072", "measure_letter": "A-11", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Luis Obispo Measure A-11", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Section 1105 (Retirement) of the San Luis Obispo Charter, which authorizes the City Council to enter into a contract with the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS), be amended to provide that the City Council may terminate or amend its contract or negotiate another contract to provide improved or reduced employee benefits only in accordance with state law and as permitted by the Board of Administration of PERS?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7848, "no_votes": 2764, "total_votes": 10612, "percent_yes": 73.954, "percent_no": 26.046000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Labor & Employment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment would require the San Luis Obispo City Council to foll...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment would require the San Luis Obispo City Council to follow state law and obtain PERS Board approval when terminating, amending, or negotiating contracts related to public employee retirement benefits. The measure adds legal constraints to the city's ability to unilaterally change its PERS contract terms.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-08-30", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486477", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Luis Obispo Measure A-11", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6206, "fingerprint": "2011|201100073|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100073|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "6552151d617c5746", "measure_id": "201100073", "measure_letter": "B-11", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Luis Obispo Measure B-11", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall San Luis Obispo Charter Section 1107 (\"Impartial and Binding Arbitration and San Luis Obispo Firefighters Association, IAFF Local 3523, Employee Disputes\") be repealed in its entirety, leaving resolution of disputes over wages, hours, or working conditions, which remain unresolved after good faith negotiations between the City and the two covered organizations, subject to the same State law procedures for impasse resolution that govern other public employee organizations?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7723, "no_votes": 2905, "total_votes": 10628, "percent_yes": 72.6665, "percent_no": 27.3335, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Labor & Employment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure repealed a charter section that provided specific binding arbitr...", "summary_text": "This measure repealed a charter section that provided specific binding arbitration procedures for disputes between the city and the firefighters' union, making firefighter labor disputes subject to the same state impasse resolution procedures that apply to other public employee organizations.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-08-30", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486560", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Luis Obispo Measure B-11", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6207, "fingerprint": "2011|201100166|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100166|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "b9393c07e05ff97d", "measure_id": "201100166", "measure_letter": "C-11", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Luis Obispo Measure C-11", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Orcutt Area Annexation to the City of San Luis Obispo ordered on April 21, 2011, by the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the approval?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29, "no_votes": 18, "total_votes": 47, "percent_yes": 61.7021, "percent_no": 38.2979, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Land Use", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure confirmed the annexation of the Orcutt Area to the City of San L...", "summary_text": "This measure confirmed the annexation of the Orcutt Area to the City of San Luis Obispo, which had been ordered by the Local Agency Formation Commission in April 2011. The annexation would proceed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the commission's approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-15", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486641", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Luis Obispo Measure C-11", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6209, "fingerprint": "2011|201100040|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100040|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "75efcebfaaafc8d9", "measure_id": "201100040", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect quality education for San Carlos elementary and middle school students; maintain educational programs including math, reading, and writing, and hands-on science instruction; attract and retain qualified teachers; maintain art and music classes, and keep school libraries open, shall San Carlos School District replace an expiring local school funding measure by extending --- without increasing --- the current tax rate of $110.60 per parcel per year for eight years, with citizen oversight and an exemption for seniors?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6373, "no_votes": 1451, "total_votes": 7824, "percent_yes": 81.4545, "percent_no": 18.545500000000004, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would extend an existing $110", "summary_text": "This measure would extend an existing $110.60 annual parcel tax for the San Carlos School District for eight years to fund educational programs, teacher retention, and school services. The measure includes citizen oversight and a senior exemption while maintaining the current tax rate without increase.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486720", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6210, "fingerprint": "2011|201100041|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100041|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6e20c2beb9a3c37d", "measure_id": "201100041", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve local elementary students' reading, writing, math, computer/technology, and other educational programs; increase safety for our children; maintain reduced class sizes; attract and retain highly qualified staff, shall the Ravenswood City School District levy a parcel tax of $98 for seven (7) years and extend the current parcel tax for the same seven-year period; with exemptions for seniors aged 65 and older; and within the District's total legal appropriations limit?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 782, "no_votes": 370, "total_votes": 1152, "percent_yes": 67.8819, "percent_no": 32.1181, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Ravenswood City School District to levy a $9...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Ravenswood City School District to levy a $98 annual parcel tax for seven years and extend an existing parcel tax for the same period, with exemptions for seniors 65 and older. The revenue would fund educational programs, safety measures, class size reduction, and staff retention within the district's legal spending limits.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486821", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6211, "fingerprint": "2011|201100042|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100042|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9d0e79d90f69ca5d", "measure_id": "201100042", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain/improve academic programs, including reading, writing, science, and math; retain highly qualified teachers; and fund computer technology, vocational training, adult education, arts and athletics at Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, and Westmoor High Schools; shall Jefferson Union High School District levy $96 per parcel annually for four years with senior exemptions, no money for administrators' salaries, independent community oversight, and all funds used for neighborhood schools and not taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8733, "no_votes": 5859, "total_votes": 14592, "percent_yes": 59.847899999999996, "percent_no": 40.152100000000004, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Jefferson Union High School District to levy...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Jefferson Union High School District to levy an annual $96 parcel tax for four years to fund academic programs, technology, and various educational services at its five high schools. The tax would include exemptions for seniors and prohibit use of funds for administrator salaries, with independent oversight and a guarantee that funds remain local.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486902", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6212, "fingerprint": "2011|201100043|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100043|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e4b3b4bb19a60edc", "measure_id": "201100043", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Pacific Parc territory, which currently consists of twenty-five (25) parcels located at 600 Willow Road in Menlo Park, California, be transferred from the Ravenswood City School District to the Menlo Park City School District, such that by operation of law, persons residing within the subject territory would be considered residents of the Menlo Park City School District effective July 1, 2012?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 35, "percent_yes": 97.1429, "percent_no": 2.8571000000000026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure transferred the Pacific Parc territory consisting of 25 parcels ...", "summary_text": "This measure transferred the Pacific Parc territory consisting of 25 parcels at 600 Willow Road in Menlo Park from the Ravenswood City School District to the Menlo Park City School District, effective July 1, 2012.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.486983", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6213, "fingerprint": "2011|201100136|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100136|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7e85203197099899", "measure_id": "201100136", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain quality education in Burlingame schools, restore and protect critical math, science, reading and writing classes, including: hands-on science labs, attract/retain qualified teachers, maintain smaller Elementary class size, support art/music, and provide instructional materials/classroom supplies, shall Burlingame Elementary School District levy an education parcel tax of $76 per parcel for four years, exempting senior citizens with no funds for administrators' salaries, independent citizen oversight, and all funds going to Burlingame District schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4337, "no_votes": 1983, "total_votes": 6320, "percent_yes": 68.6234, "percent_no": 31.376599999999996, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Burlingame Elementary School District to lev...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Burlingame Elementary School District to levy a $76 annual parcel tax for four years to fund educational programs and services, with exemptions for senior citizens and prohibition on using funds for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.487076", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6214, "fingerprint": "2011|201100137|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100137|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f448e79cd92c24ae", "measure_id": "201100137", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To insure the provision of affordable rental housing in response to the Palmer v. City of Los Angeles court decision, shall City Council Ordinance 2011-7 be approved authorizing the City of San Mateo to amend its General Plan and Municipal Code to provide for alternative methods of providing adequate affordable rental housing, consisting of a housing impact fee and fee refund incentive program for rental projects agreeing to provide below market rate units?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5238, "no_votes": 5358, "total_votes": 10596, "percent_yes": 49.4337, "percent_no": 50.5663, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Housing", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have authorized San Mateo to implement alternative methods ...", "summary_text": "The measure would have authorized San Mateo to implement alternative methods for providing affordable rental housing, including a housing impact fee and fee refund incentive program for rental projects that agree to include below-market-rate units. This was proposed in response to the Palmer v. City of Los Angeles court decision affecting affordable housing requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.487155", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6215, "fingerprint": "2011|201100138|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100138|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6e8581e0a8eb1725", "measure_id": "201100138", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To prepare College of San Mateo, Canada College and Skyline College students for universities and high-demand jobs; modernize math and science classrooms and labs; upgrade classroom technology, computer and job training labs; increase earthquake, fire and accessibility safety; and replace aging systems with energy efficient models, shall San Mateo County Community College District issue $564,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with annual independent audits, local control over proceeds, and a Citizens' Committee providing oversight?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48933, "no_votes": 43238, "total_votes": 92171, "percent_yes": 53.0894, "percent_no": 46.9106, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the San Mateo County Community College District ...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the San Mateo County Community College District to issue $564 million in bonds to modernize facilities at College of San Mateo, Canada College, and Skyline College, including upgrading classrooms, labs, technology, and building systems while improving safety and accessibility features.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.487236", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6216, "fingerprint": "2011|201100139|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100139|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f5ebc8e204f93ead", "measure_id": "201100139", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve funding for general city services such as libraries, parks, street repairs, and public safety, and support other fundamental City services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax (\u201cHotel Tax\u201d) charged to hotel guests in Redwood City from the current rate of 10% to a new rate of 12%, with proceeds placed in the City\u2019s General Fund which is subject to the City\u2019s annual independent financial audit?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6061, "no_votes": 2177, "total_votes": 8238, "percent_yes": 73.5737, "percent_no": 26.426299999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) charged to hot...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) charged to hotel guests in Redwood City from 10% to 12%, with proceeds going to the city's general fund to support city services including libraries, parks, street repairs, and public safety.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.487319", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6217, "fingerprint": "2011|201100140|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100140|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "98ec09c8803f97e7", "measure_id": "201100140", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the business license tax for certain recycling establishments that recycle 100,000 tons or more of material during any single calendar year be increased to up to $3,000,000 per year, subject to annual increase of either 3% or the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index, whichever is greater, after the amount reaches $3,000,000 a year?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 680, "no_votes": 199, "total_votes": 879, "percent_yes": 77.3606, "percent_no": 22.639399999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased the business license tax for large recycling establish...", "summary_text": "This measure increased the business license tax for large recycling establishments that process 100,000 tons or more of material annually to up to $3,000,000 per year. The tax amount is subject to annual increases of either 3% or the Consumer Price Index percentage increase, whichever is greater, once it reaches the $3,000,000 threshold.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.487400", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6218, "fingerprint": "2011|201100141|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100141|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0cd587d987c8af64", "measure_id": "201100141", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Charter be amended so that the City of Redwood City may, like the majority of cities subject to the general laws of the state, buy, sell, lease, and dispose of its real and personal property for the common benefit with the approval of a majority of its City Council and enact additional rules by ordinance for this purpose?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4876, "no_votes": 3082, "total_votes": 7958, "percent_yes": 61.271699999999996, "percent_no": 38.728300000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This charter amendment allows Redwood City to buy, sell, lease, and dispose o...", "summary_text": "This charter amendment allows Redwood City to buy, sell, lease, and dispose of real and personal property with majority City Council approval, aligning the city's property transaction authority with that of most other California cities operating under general state law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.487479", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6219, "fingerprint": "2011|201100142|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100142|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "572c5394e63a5ee5", "measure_id": "201100142", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To protect local elementary and middle schools from state budget cuts; maintain high quality education; protect academic programs in math, science, reading and writing; attract and retain qualified teachers; and support library services and classroom computer instruction; shall Pacifica School District replace its expiring parcel tax at $118 a year for 5 years, with independent citizens oversight, exemptions for senior citizens, no funds used for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local to promote student achievement?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5652, "no_votes": 2502, "total_votes": 8154, "percent_yes": 69.3157, "percent_no": 30.684299999999993, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would replace Pacifica School District's expiring parcel tax with...", "summary_text": "The measure would replace Pacifica School District's expiring parcel tax with a new $118 annual tax on parcels for 5 years to fund elementary and middle school programs. The tax would include exemptions for senior citizens, prohibit use of funds for administrator salaries, and require independent oversight.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.487557", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6220, "fingerprint": "2011|201100143|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100143|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ca40126595facc7d", "measure_id": "201100143", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve funding for general city services such as libraries, parks, and public safety, shall an ordinance be approved increasing, over three years, the business license tax rates by $21 plus $15 per employee (with a similar increase for businesses not taxed on a per employee basis) annually adjusted thereafter based on the Consumer Price Index, with proceeds placed in the City's General Fund, subject to the City's annual independent financial audit?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4554, "no_votes": 3640, "total_votes": 8194, "percent_yes": 55.577299999999994, "percent_no": 44.422700000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased San Mateo's business license tax rates by $21 plus $15...", "summary_text": "This measure increased San Mateo's business license tax rates by $21 plus $15 per employee over three years, with annual adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index. The revenue goes to the city's general fund to support services like libraries, parks, and public safety.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.487637", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6221, "fingerprint": "2011|201100144|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100144|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d258bc1999c32680", "measure_id": "201100144", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To continue to renovate and modernize its aging schools and classrooms, improve energy efficiency, update classroom equipment and technology, improve school safety and build a new cafeteria at Taylor Middle School, shall the Millbrae School District be authorized to issue $30,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2550, "no_votes": 1811, "total_votes": 4361, "percent_yes": 58.4728, "percent_no": 41.5272, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Millbrae School District to issue $30 millio...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Millbrae School District to issue $30 million in bonds to renovate and modernize schools, improve energy efficiency and technology, enhance safety, and build a new cafeteria at Taylor Middle School. The bonds would be subject to legal interest rate limits and oversight by an Independent Oversight Committee, with no funds designated for administrator salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.487715", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6222, "fingerprint": "2011|201100145|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100145|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "935c0e2f7f39cd26", "measure_id": "201100145", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To update classrooms with up-to-date computers and technology, renovate and modernize classrooms and school facilities throughout the district; replace outdated heating systems; upgrade playfields and playground equipment; and make energy cost-saving improvements; shall San Bruno Park School District be authorized to issue $40 million of bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits and an independent citizens' oversight committee, and all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2368, "no_votes": 2239, "total_votes": 4607, "percent_yes": 51.4, "percent_no": 48.6, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the San Bruno Park School District to issue $40 ...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the San Bruno Park School District to issue $40 million in bonds to fund technology upgrades, classroom and facility renovations, heating system replacements, playground improvements, and energy efficiency projects. The bonds would be subject to annual audits and oversight by an independent citizens' committee, with funds restricted to local use and prohibited from being used for administrative salaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.487908", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6223, "fingerprint": "2011|201100146|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100146|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9c82b5805cfbdf54", "measure_id": "201100146", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding for general city services, including police, fire, parks, recreation, and repairing and maintaining the levee, lagoon, streets, and other infrastructure, shall the City of Foster City approve an ordinance amending the Foster City Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from eight percent (8%) to nine and one-half (9.5%) percent on the rate charged to hotel guests staying within the City to be effective January 1, 2012?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4184, "no_votes": 804, "total_votes": 4988, "percent_yes": 83.88130000000001, "percent_no": 16.11869999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased Foster City's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from...", "summary_text": "This measure increased Foster City's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 8% to 9.5% on hotel guests, with the revenue designated for general city services including police, fire, parks, recreation, and infrastructure maintenance. The tax increase took effect January 1, 2012.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.488070", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6208, "fingerprint": "2011|201100031|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100031|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9b8ac7e64c6cd884", "measure_id": "201100031", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "San Mateo Measure W", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Brisbane School District renew its current parcel tax with an inflation increase by levying a special tax of not more than $119 annually per parcel to provide teachers/instructional aides for reading, music, and art; providing exemptions for eligible senior citizens? Shall District's annual appropriation limit be raised between 7/1/2011 and 6/30/2016 in an amount equal to levy of said tax, with funds spent exclusively on schools within Brisbane School District and not used for other purposes?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 967, "no_votes": 412, "total_votes": 1379, "percent_yes": 70.1233, "percent_no": 29.8767, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would renew Brisbane School District's existing parcel tax with ...", "summary_text": "This measure would renew Brisbane School District's existing parcel tax with an inflation increase, setting the rate at no more than $119 annually per parcel to fund teachers and instructional aides for reading, music, and art programs, with exemptions for eligible senior citizens. It would also raise the district's annual appropriation limit for five years to accommodate the tax revenue, with funds restricted to use within the district's schools.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-03-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.488197", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Mateo Measure W", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11475, "fingerprint": "2011|201100147|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100147|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a4e85221b7e3a5a8", "measure_id": "201100147", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Sections 600, 601, 602, and 605 be amended to change the current Council-appointed Mayor to a directly-elected Mayor for a 4-year term, to provide an 8-year lifetime term limit for a directly-elected Mayor, and to provide that service as Mayor is not counted toward Council term limits and a person can serve a combined total of 16 years as Mayor and Council member in a twenty-year period?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6331, "no_votes": 10937, "total_votes": 17268, "percent_yes": 36.6632, "percent_no": 63.3368, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.118940", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.557188", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.103057", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Sections 600, 601, 602, and 605 be amended to change the current Council-appointed Mayor to a directly-elected Mayor for a 4-year term, to provide an 8-year lifetime term limit for a directly-elected Mayor, and to provide that service as Mayor is not counted toward Council term limits and a person can serve a combined total of 16 years as Mayor and Council member in a twenty-year period?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6224, "fingerprint": "2011|201100044|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100044|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3ad858e21b7a853a", "measure_id": "201100044", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Santa Clara Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Charter Sections 600, 601, 602, and 605 be amended to change the current Council-appointed Mayor to a directly-elected Mayor for a 4-year term, to provide an 8-year lifetime term limit for a directly-elected Mayor, and to provide that service as Mayor is not counted toward Council term limits and a person can serve a combined total of 16 years as Mayor and Council member in a twenty-year period?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6331, "no_votes": 10937, "total_votes": 17268, "percent_yes": 36.6632, "percent_no": 63.3368, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Elections", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have amended Santa Clara's city charter to change from a co...", "summary_text": "The measure would have amended Santa Clara's city charter to change from a council-appointed mayor to a directly-elected mayor serving four-year terms with an eight-year lifetime limit. It would have allowed a person to serve up to 16 years combined as mayor and council member within any 20-year period, with mayoral service not counting toward council term limits.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Santa Clara Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11476, "fingerprint": "2011|201100148|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100148|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "02ed25805c1d6543", "measure_id": "201100148", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to reduce future Council compensation increases, shall Charter Section 603 be amended to delete the current automatic 5% annual increase in Council compensation, to set the 2012 Council compensation at $2,088.64 per month and Mayor compensation at $2,784.86 per month, and to provide for annual cost of living adjustments tied to the Consumer Price Index not to exceed 5% or result in a decrease?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15084, "no_votes": 1715, "total_votes": 16799, "percent_yes": 89.7911, "percent_no": 10.2089, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.119126", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.557510", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.103239", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to reduce future Council compensation increases, shall Charter Section 603 be amended to delete the current automatic 5% annual increase in Council compensation, to set the 2012 Council compensation at $2,088.64 per month and Mayor compensation at $2,784.86 per month, and to provide for annual cost of living adjustments tied to the Consumer Price Index not to exceed 5% or result in a decrease?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6225, "fingerprint": "2011|201100045|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100045|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "2a60363625428bb6", "measure_id": "201100045", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Santa Clara Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "In order to reduce future Council compensation increases, shall Charter Section 603 be amended to delete the current automatic 5% annual increase in Council compensation, to set the 2012 Council compensation at $2,088.64 per month and Mayor compensation at $2,784.86 per month, and to provide for annual cost of living adjustments tied to the Consumer Price Index not to exceed 5% or result in a decrease?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15084, "no_votes": 1715, "total_votes": 16799, "percent_yes": 89.7911, "percent_no": 10.2089, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended Santa Clara's city charter to eliminate automatic 5% ann...", "summary_text": "This measure amended Santa Clara's city charter to eliminate automatic 5% annual increases in city council compensation and instead tie future adjustments to the Consumer Price Index with a 5% cap. It set 2012 council member compensation at $2,088.64 per month and mayor compensation at $2,784.86 per month.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Santa Clara Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11477, "fingerprint": "2011|201100149|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100149|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6dc62951ed5ad305", "measure_id": "201100149", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and protect general city services, including library services, neighborhood police patrols, rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times, city street maintenance, current levels of police officers and school traffic safety and crossing guards, shall the City of Cupertino increase the existing transient occupancy tax paid by hotel guests from 10% to 12% with proceeds placed in the City\u2019s General Fund for local use, requiring annual audits and public expenditure review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8088, "no_votes": 1717, "total_votes": 9805, "percent_yes": 82.4885, "percent_no": 17.511499999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.119311", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.557868", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.103419", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and protect general city services, including library services, neighborhood police patrols, rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times, city street maintenance, current levels of police officers and school traffic safety and crossing guards, shall the City of Cupertino increase the existing transient occupancy tax paid by hotel guests from 10% to 12% with proceeds placed in the City\u2019s General Fund for local use, requiring annual audits and public expenditure review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6226, "fingerprint": "2011|201100046|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100046|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "465d677b95c5a20c", "measure_id": "201100046", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Santa Clara Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To maintain and protect general city services, including library services, neighborhood police patrols, rapid 9-1-1 emergency response times, city street maintenance, current levels of police officers and school traffic safety and crossing guards, shall the City of Cupertino increase the existing transient occupancy tax paid by hotel guests from 10% to 12% with proceeds placed in the City\u2019s General Fund for local use, requiring annual audits and public expenditure review?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8088, "no_votes": 1717, "total_votes": 9805, "percent_yes": 82.4885, "percent_no": 17.511499999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure increased Cupertino's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 10...", "summary_text": "The measure increased Cupertino's transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) from 10% to 12%, with proceeds going to the city's general fund to support city services including library services, police patrols, emergency response, street maintenance, and school safety programs. The measure requires annual audits and public expenditure review of the tax revenue.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Santa Clara Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6228, "fingerprint": "2011|201100150|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100150|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c2dc1ea28aa77b00", "measure_id": "201100150", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Santa Clara Measure D", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide the City with greater control over employee costs, staffing and services and allow the City Council to make final decisions regarding all matters related to public safety employee compensations, benefits, and working conditions, shall Article V of the Palo Alto City Charter be repealed in its entirety, eliminating the requirement that public safety employee disputes be resolved through binding interest arbitration?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10319, "no_votes": 4944, "total_votes": 15263, "percent_yes": 67.6079, "percent_no": 32.3921, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure repealed Article V of the Palo Alto City Charter, eliminating th...", "summary_text": "This measure repealed Article V of the Palo Alto City Charter, eliminating the requirement that disputes over public safety employee compensation, benefits, and working conditions be resolved through binding interest arbitration. It gave the City Council final decision-making authority over all matters related to public safety employee terms of employment.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.488879", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Santa Clara Measure D", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11478, "fingerprint": "2011|201100151|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100151|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8174351c0aee82a0", "measure_id": "201100151", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ten acres of existing parkland in Byxbee Park be undedicated for the exclusive purpose of building a processing facility for yard trimmings, food waste and other organic material?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9946, "no_votes": 5445, "total_votes": 15391, "percent_yes": 64.62219999999999, "percent_no": 35.37780000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.119680", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.576093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.103790", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ten acres of existing parkland in Byxbee Park be undedicated for the exclusive purpose of building a processing facility for yard trimmings, food waste and other organic material?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6227, "fingerprint": "2011|201100047|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100047|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "49005a0e508b18e2", "measure_id": "201100047", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Santa Clara Measure E", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall ten acres of existing parkland in Byxbee Park be undedicated for the exclusive purpose of building a processing facility for yard trimmings, food waste and other organic material?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9946, "no_votes": 5445, "total_votes": 15391, "percent_yes": 64.62219999999999, "percent_no": 35.37780000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Environment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would undedicate ten acres of existing parkland in Byxbee Park t...", "summary_text": "This measure would undedicate ten acres of existing parkland in Byxbee Park to allow construction of a processing facility for yard trimmings, food waste, and other organic materials.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Santa Clara Measure E", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6229, "fingerprint": "2011|201100048|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100048|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "b93d73e24a5593da", "measure_id": "201100048", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Santa Cruz Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide stable funding for local high schools, maintain outstanding core academic programs in math, science and English, retain highly qualified teachers, provide programs that prepare students for college and careers, and provide classroom materials like books and science lab equipment, shall the Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School District be authorized to levy $49 per parcel annually for six years, with citizen oversight, an exemption for seniors, no funds for administrators' salaries, and every dollar staying in local high schools?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 961, "no_votes": 529, "total_votes": 1490, "percent_yes": 64.4966, "percent_no": 35.5034, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School D...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School District to levy a $49 annual parcel tax for six years to fund academic programs, teacher retention, and classroom materials. The tax would include senior exemptions, citizen oversight, restrictions on administrative salary use, and a requirement that funds remain within local high schools.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.489202", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Santa Cruz Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6230, "fingerprint": "2011|201100062|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100062|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "c8dfb6a8021b7869", "measure_id": "201100062", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Siskiyou Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City of Mt. Shasta adopt an Ordinance adding Chapter 3.45 \u201cTransactions and Use Tax \u2013 Libraries\u201d to Title 3 of the Mt. Shasta Municipal Code, imposing a .25% Transactions and Use Tax to fund library operations of the Mt. Shasta Branch Library?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 635, "no_votes": 201, "total_votes": 836, "percent_yes": 75.9569, "percent_no": 24.043099999999995, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would impose a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would impose a 0.25% transactions and use tax in Mt. Shasta to fund operations of the Mt. Shasta Branch Library.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.489431", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Siskiyou Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6231, "fingerprint": "2011|201100063|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100063|SOLANO", "content_hash": "64ef017035e1c4e8", "measure_id": "201100063", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Solano Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance amending the Rio Vista Municipal Code to reduce water and wastewater rates be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1123, "no_votes": 1383, "total_votes": 2506, "percent_yes": 44.8125, "percent_no": 55.1875, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance would have amended the Rio Vista Municipal Code to lower the c...", "summary_text": "This ordinance would have amended the Rio Vista Municipal Code to lower the city's water and wastewater rates for residents and businesses.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-06-07", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.489557", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Solano Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6232, "fingerprint": "2011|201100152|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100152|SOLANO", "content_hash": "5e8b4675450925da", "measure_id": "201100152", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Solano Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To enhance funding for 9-1-1 response, police patrols, firefighter and paramedic services, youth and senior programs, street and pothole repairs, graffiti removal, economic development, and general City services, shall the sales tax be raised one cent, expiring after ten years, with all revenue and expenditures subject to annual independent audits and all revenue legally required to stay in Vallejo?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9295, "no_votes": 9136, "total_votes": 18431, "percent_yes": 50.4313, "percent_no": 49.5687, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure raised the sales tax by one cent (1%) in Vallejo for ten years t...", "summary_text": "This measure raised the sales tax by one cent (1%) in Vallejo for ten years to fund emergency services, police, fire, youth and senior programs, street repairs, and other city services. The measure required annual independent audits and mandated that all revenue remain within the city.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.489652", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Solano Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6233, "fingerprint": "2011|201100153|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100153|SOLANO", "content_hash": "74cae3a6e78dcebe", "measure_id": "201100153", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Solano Measure C", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide funding for general City services, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax at a rate of up to 10% of gross receipts and a base tax of $500 (adjusted annually for changes in the Consumer Price Index) on marijuana businesses in Vallejo, subject to annual independent audits and all revenue legally required to stay in Vallejo?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13982, "no_votes": 4293, "total_votes": 18275, "percent_yes": 76.5089, "percent_no": 23.491100000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a tax on marijuana businesses in Vallejo consisting of u...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a tax on marijuana businesses in Vallejo consisting of up to 10% of gross receipts plus a $500 base tax (adjusted annually for inflation), with revenue required to stay in the city and subject to annual independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.489785", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Solano Measure C", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6234, "fingerprint": "2011|201100074|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100074|SONOMA", "content_hash": "8539a16ef76b1438", "measure_id": "201100074", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Sonoma Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To preserve quality education despite inadequate state funding and prevent further program cuts, shall the Kenwood School District renew - without increasing - the existing school parcel tax of $52.00 per year for a period of five years, beginning July 1, 2012, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election? Funds to be used for maintaining and enhancing core programs and essential enrichment programs and continuing our commitment to small class sizes.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1388, "no_votes": 326, "total_votes": 1714, "percent_yes": 80.9802, "percent_no": 19.019800000000004, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would renew the Kenwood School District's existing $52 annual par...", "summary_text": "The measure would renew the Kenwood School District's existing $52 annual parcel tax for five years beginning July 1, 2012, without increasing the current rate. The funds would be used to maintain core educational programs, enrichment programs, and small class sizes.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-08-30", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.489898", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Sonoma Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6235, "fingerprint": "2011|201100154|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100154|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "d905f316dcb119c5", "measure_id": "201100154", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Stanislaus Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the current Utility Users' Tax Ordinance be amended to reduce the tax on telecommunications users from 6% to 5.8%; modernize the ordinance to reflect changes in federal and state law and to treat taxpayers the same regardless of technology; preserve funding for essential municipal services like law enforcement, gang and drug prevention programs, and fire protection; and all money staying local for services and facilities in Modesto?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17486, "no_votes": 5353, "total_votes": 22839, "percent_yes": 76.562, "percent_no": 23.438000000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure amended Stanislaus County's Utility Users' Tax Ordinance ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure amended Stanislaus County's Utility Users' Tax Ordinance to reduce the telecommunications tax rate from 6% to 5.8% and update the ordinance to align with current federal and state laws while ensuring technology-neutral treatment of taxpayers. The measure preserved local funding for municipal services including law enforcement, gang and drug prevention programs, and fire protection.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.489992", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Stanislaus Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6236, "fingerprint": "2011|201100155|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100155|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "b6d8bc835e08eba7", "measure_id": "201100155", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Stanislaus Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To help prevent additional budget cuts and maintain infrastructure and City services, including police and fire protection, senior programs and other general services, shall the City of Oakdale enact a 1/2 cent sales tax, expiring in three(3) years, with resident oversight and annual independent audits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1728, "no_votes": 1392, "total_votes": 3120, "percent_yes": 55.38459999999999, "percent_no": 44.61540000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure enacted a 0", "summary_text": "This measure enacted a 0.5% sales tax in Oakdale for three years to fund general city services including police, fire protection, senior programs, and infrastructure maintenance, with provisions for resident oversight and annual independent audits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.490101", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Stanislaus Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6237, "fingerprint": "2011|201100156|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100156|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "dae292cc7492f037", "measure_id": "201100156", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Stanislaus Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following unincorporated county area described below? The unincorporated area designated \"Rouse-Colorado Neighborhood\" which is described generally as the area bounded by South Avenue on the north, Sunset Avenue and Colorado Avenue on the east, Robertson Road on the south and Sutter Avenue on the west.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13605, "no_votes": 9201, "total_votes": 22806, "percent_yes": 59.6554, "percent_no": 40.3446, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Transportation", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ordinance authorized the City Council to provide sewer service to the un...", "summary_text": "This ordinance authorized the City Council to provide sewer service to the unincorporated Rouse-Colorado Neighborhood area, which is bounded by South Avenue, Sunset/Colorado Avenue, Robertson Road, and Sutter Avenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.490206", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Stanislaus Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6238, "fingerprint": "2011|201100157|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100157|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "deb5f6d40e4ebd0d", "measure_id": "201100157", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Stanislaus Measure Q", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Modesto seek to move employees from a defined benefit plan for employees to a defined contribution (401k style) plan for retirement benefits?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13369, "no_votes": 9767, "total_votes": 23136, "percent_yes": 57.784400000000005, "percent_no": 42.215599999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": "Labor & Employment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked whether the City of Modesto should transition emp...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked whether the City of Modesto should transition employee retirement benefits from a defined benefit pension plan to a defined contribution 401(k)-style plan. The measure passed, indicating voter support for the city to pursue this change in employee retirement structure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.490293", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Stanislaus Measure Q", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6239, "fingerprint": "2011|201100158|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100158|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "d1775993acb5de09", "measure_id": "201100158", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Stanislaus Measure R", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Modesto seek to avoid \"pension spiking\" by city employees by moving to an average of the last three year salary as the baseline rather than current last single highest year?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17482, "no_votes": 5797, "total_votes": 23279, "percent_yes": 75.0977, "percent_no": 24.902299999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": "Labor & Employment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked whether the City of Modesto should change its pen...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked whether the City of Modesto should change its pension calculation from using the single highest year of salary to using an average of the last three years of salary as the baseline.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.490386", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Stanislaus Measure R", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6240, "fingerprint": "2011|201100159|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100159|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "aaea541f1b34b8a3", "measure_id": "201100159", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Stanislaus Measure S", "description": null, "ballot_question": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Modesto seek retirement formulas that increase employee retirement age to mirror the private sector retirement?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14822, "no_votes": 8581, "total_votes": 23403, "percent_yes": 63.3338, "percent_no": 36.6662, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "A", "topic_primary": "Labor & Employment", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This advisory measure asked whether the City of Modesto should pursue retirem...", "summary_text": "This advisory measure asked whether the City of Modesto should pursue retirement formulas that would raise the retirement age for city employees to align with private sector standards.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.490493", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Stanislaus Measure S", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6241, "fingerprint": "2011|201100160|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100160|TULARE", "content_hash": "1842471f115a3563", "measure_id": "201100160", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Tulare Measure X", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a new unified school district, the members of the governing board of which shall be elected from trustee areas, be formed from the existing Woodlake Union High School District and Woodlake Union (Elementary) School District, and excluding the Stone Corral School District and the Three Rivers Union School District which shall continue to feed into the high school of the new unified school district under the same terms that existed before any action to unify?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1056, "no_votes": 240, "total_votes": 1296, "percent_yes": 81.4815, "percent_no": 18.518500000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would create a new unified school district by combining the exist...", "summary_text": "The measure would create a new unified school district by combining the existing Woodlake Union High School District and Woodlake Union Elementary School District, with board members elected from trustee areas. The Stone Corral School District and Three Rivers Union School District would remain separate but continue sending students to the new unified district's high school under existing arrangements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.490583", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Tulare Measure X", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6243, "fingerprint": "2011|201100161|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100161|VENTURA", "content_hash": "2acf4387dee8c6f6", "measure_id": "201100161", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Ventura Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the city adopt Ordinance No.11-831, \u201cAn ordinance of the City of Fillmore adopting the Fillmore Vital Services Three-Quarter Cent Transactions (Sales) and Use Tax\u201d, to be administered by the State Board of Equalization, and to sunset upon the earlier to occur of: (1) Five Years, or (2) Resolution favorable to the city of both the litigation brought by the cities of Livermore and Industry, and the proceedings before the State Board of Equalization?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 463, "no_votes": 817, "total_votes": 1280, "percent_yes": 36.1719, "percent_no": 63.8281, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would have imposed a 0", "summary_text": "The measure would have imposed a 0.75% sales tax in Fillmore to fund vital city services, with the tax automatically ending after five years or upon favorable resolution of specific litigation involving the cities of Livermore and Industry and State Board of Equalization proceedings.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.490675", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Ventura Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6242, "fingerprint": "2011|201100162|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100162|VENTURA", "content_hash": "5f36fe3bf92d8791", "measure_id": "201100162", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Ventura Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To provide local school funding that cannot be taken by state government; retain high-quality teachers; preserve smaller class sizes; minimize teacher layoffs; and protect academic opportunities and high achievement in science, math, reading and the arts; shall Las Virgenes Unified School District serving Bell Canyon establish a parcel tax of $95 annually for eight years, exempting seniors, and guaranteeing independent fiscal oversight, no funds for administrators, and every dollar to local schools preserving quality education?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 170, "no_votes": 118, "total_votes": 288, "percent_yes": 59.0278, "percent_no": 40.9722, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would establish a $95 annual parcel tax for eight years in the L...", "summary_text": "This measure would establish a $95 annual parcel tax for eight years in the Las Virgenes Unified School District to fund local schools, with exemptions for seniors and restrictions preventing funds from being used for administrators or taken by the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-11-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.490780", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Ventura Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6244, "fingerprint": "2011|201100049|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100049|YOLO", "content_hash": "ae955a504d6639c1", "measure_id": "201100049", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Yolo Measure A", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Recognizing cuts in state funding, shall the Davis Joint Unified School District be authorized to levy an emergency special tax for a period of two years not to exceed the annual rate of $20.00 per dwelling unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $200.00 per parcel for all other parcels, to fund essential school programs including core subjects, elective classes, reduced class sizes, counselors and school site safety?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11073, "no_votes": 5403, "total_votes": 16476, "percent_yes": 67.2068, "percent_no": 32.7932, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would authorize the Davis Joint Unified School District to levy a...", "summary_text": "The measure would authorize the Davis Joint Unified School District to levy a special tax for two years at rates of $20 per dwelling unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $200 per parcel for other parcels to fund school programs including core subjects, electives, reduced class sizes, counselors, and school safety.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-05-03", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.490882", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Yolo Measure A", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6245, "fingerprint": "2011|201100065|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2011|201100065|YOLO", "content_hash": "2e0dff6ef7465a95", "measure_id": "201100065", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2011, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Yolo Measure B", "description": null, "ballot_question": "In order to reduce the impact of State budget cuts and provide financial stability for the Esparto Unified School District, shall the District be authorized to levy a parcel tax of $100 per parcel for five years, adjusted for inflation, for purposes of supporting student transportation, athletics, and core and elective academic programs? Parcel tax funds will not be spent on administrator salaries and will be audited annually by independent CPA\u2019s as required by law.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 286, "no_votes": 671, "total_votes": 957, "percent_yes": 29.885099999999998, "percent_no": 70.1149, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Esparto Unified School District to levy a $1...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Esparto Unified School District to levy a $100 annual parcel tax for five years, adjusted for inflation, to fund student transportation, athletics, and academic programs. The funds would be prohibited from being used for administrator salaries and would be subject to annual independent audits.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2011-07-12", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.494524", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Yolo Measure B", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6249, "fingerprint": "2010|201000097|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000097|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "93d8cf8a7d745de8", "measure_id": "201000097", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall a portion of Tracy Joint Unified School District and the Lammersville Elementary School District be unified to form the Lammersville Joint Unified School District with a five-member board elected at large while permitting the Mountain House Elementary School District to continue to exist as an independent elementary school district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 944, "no_votes": 218, "total_votes": 1162, "percent_yes": 81.23924, "percent_no": 18.760760000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.930157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.108028", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a portion of Tracy Joint Unified School District and the Lammersville Elementary School District be unified to form the Lammersville Joint Unified School District with a five-member board elected at large while permitting the Mountain House Elementary School District to continue to exist as an independent elementary school district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6265, "fingerprint": "2010|201000201|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000201|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7daff7b663283297", "measure_id": "201000201", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent severe cuts to essential services such as police, fire, paramedic, library, streets, parks and other services, shall Union City adopt an Ordinance enacting a half-cent sales tax expiring four years from the date it is first collected, reviewed by a citizen's oversight committee, with annual independent audits, and all funds for Union City and no funds for the State of California?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8608, "no_votes": 5711, "total_votes": 14319, "percent_yes": 60.11592999999999, "percent_no": 39.88407000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.935066", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.111956", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent severe cuts to essential services such as police, fire, paramedic, library, streets, parks and other services, shall Union City adopt an Ordinance enacting a half-cent sales tax expiring four years from the date it is first collected, reviewed by a citizen's oversight committee, with annual independent audits, and all funds for Union City and no funds for the State of California?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6246, "fingerprint": "2010|201000001|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000001|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "288b1bea4deb21da", "measure_id": "201000001", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City Charter Amendment, and ordinance proposing General Plan Amendments, Zoning Map and Text Amendment and Development Agreement, regarding development of Alameda Point be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2361, "no_votes": 13797, "total_votes": 16158, "percent_yes": 14.611956, "percent_no": 85.38804400000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-02-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.928914", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.107111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City Charter Amendment, and ordinance proposing General Plan Amendments, Zoning Map and Text Amendment and Development Agreement, regarding development of Alameda Point be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6260, "fingerprint": "2010|201000196|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000196|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c1ad819515bf5c36", "measure_id": "201000196", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To restore community police officer positions and protect and enhance vital public safety services in the City of Oakland, shall the City, at no additional cost to taxpayers, amend the Violence Prevention and Public Safety Act of 2004 (Measure Y) to suspend the requirement that the City appropriate non-Measure Y funding each year to staff the police department at fiscal year 2003-2004 levels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73006, "no_votes": 30148, "total_votes": 103154, "percent_yes": 70.77379, "percent_no": 29.226209999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.933661", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.110982", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore community police officer positions and protect and enhance vital public safety services in the City of Oakland, shall the City, at no additional cost to taxpayers, amend the Violence Prevention and Public Safety Act of 2004 (Measure Y) to suspend the requirement that the City appropriate non-Measure Y funding each year to staff the police department at fiscal year 2003-2004 levels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6247, "fingerprint": "2010|201000049|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000049|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a8df9f6d04001ee3", "measure_id": "201000049", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Berkeley Community Facilities District No.2: incur bonded indebtedness not exceeding $22,500,000 to replace the multiuse indoor Warm Pool, renovate Willard and West Campus pools, construct a multipurpose pool at King; levy a sepcial tax at a rate not exceeding $0.0258 per square foot of building area to finance that indebtedness and not exceeding $0.0126 indexed for inflation, to maintain pools and operate aquatics programs; and establish an annual District appropriations limit of $3,500,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16341, "no_votes": 9912, "total_votes": 26253, "percent_yes": 62.244314, "percent_no": 37.755686, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.929464", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.107294", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Berkeley Community Facilities District No.2: incur bonded indebtedness not exceeding $22,500,000 to replace the multiuse indoor Warm Pool, renovate Willard and West Campus pools, construct a multipurpose pool at King; levy a sepcial tax at a rate not exceeding $0.0258 per square foot of building area to finance that indebtedness and not exceeding $0.0126 indexed for inflation, to maintain pools and operate aquatics programs; and establish an annual District appropriations limit of $3,500,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6248, "fingerprint": "2010|201000050|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000050|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "280c830c41d186ea", "measure_id": "201000050", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Development Plan for the Oak Grove property be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8174, "no_votes": 9544, "total_votes": 17718, "percent_yes": 46.133876, "percent_no": 53.866124, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.929881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.107495", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Development Plan for the Oak Grove property be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6250, "fingerprint": "2010|201000134|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000134|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5fced95b1414230e", "measure_id": "201000134", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high quality Alameda public schools by protecting strong core academic programs that promote science, math, and language arts, attracting and retaining excellent teachers, and supporting art, music and small class size, shall Alameda Unified School District replace two existing parcel taxes with one annual parcel tax for 8 years in the amounts described in the voter pamphlet, with an exemption for seniors, no funds for administrators' salaries, and every dollar staying in Alameda schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14415, "no_votes": 7551, "total_votes": 21966, "percent_yes": 65.62415, "percent_no": 34.37585, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-22", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.930477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.108345", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high quality Alameda public schools by protecting strong core academic programs that promote science, math, and language arts, attracting and retaining excellent teachers, and supporting art, music and small class size, shall Alameda Unified School District replace two existing parcel taxes with one annual parcel tax for 8 years in the amounts described in the voter pamphlet, with an exemption for seniors, no funds for administrators' salaries, and every dollar staying in Alameda schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6251, "fingerprint": "2010|201000147|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000147|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f96265bf85febb41", "measure_id": "201000147", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To repair and maintain local streets and roads; improve traffic flow and bicyclist, pedestrian and driver safety; improve public transporation; and encourage green transportation options; shall a local vehicle registration fee of ten dollars be established in Alameda County with expenditures subject to strict monitoring and with all revenues staying in Alameda County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 245582, "no_votes": 142696, "total_votes": 388278, "percent_yes": 63.249010000000006, "percent_no": 36.750989999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.930779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.108632", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and maintain local streets and roads; improve traffic flow and bicyclist, pedestrian and driver safety; improve public transporation; and encourage green transportation options; shall a local vehicle registration fee of ten dollars be established in Alameda County with expenditures subject to strict monitoring and with all revenues staying in Alameda County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6271, "fingerprint": "2010|201000395|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000395|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a3e8529e9b187dea", "measure_id": "201000395", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve and continue affordable college education, job training/workforce preparation by constructing/acquiring equipment/sites/facilities and making repairs/upgrades, inclduing: Renovating classrooms/science laboratories, Acquiring up-to-date classroom technology, Upgrading for earthquake/fire safety, and Improved disabled access, shall Ohlone Community College District issue $349,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates with all funds spent locally, independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries or Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37042, "no_votes": 21772, "total_votes": 58814, "percent_yes": 62.981606, "percent_no": 37.018394, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.938594", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.113129", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve and continue affordable college education, job training/workforce preparation by constructing/acquiring equipment/sites/facilities and making repairs/upgrades, inclduing: Renovating classrooms/science laboratories, Acquiring up-to-date classroom technology, Upgrading for earthquake/fire safety, and Improved disabled access, shall Ohlone Community College District issue $349,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates with all funds spent locally, independent citizens' oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries or Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6266, "fingerprint": "2010|201000390|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000390|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8036d9ec027b9c7d", "measure_id": "201000390", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide essential maintenance of schools and grounds, shall Berkeley Unified School District continue its existing special tax of 6.31\u00a2 / square foot on residential buildings and 9.46\u00a2 / square foot on commercial buildings, and $20 on unimproved parcels with annual cost-of-living adjustments for 10 years? Revenues maintain school buildings, classrooms, playgrounds, roofs, electrical systems, and address fire and safety hazards. The state cannot take funds. An independent committee oversees funds.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33946, "no_votes": 8027, "total_votes": 41973, "percent_yes": 80.8758, "percent_no": 19.124200000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.935370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.112146", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide essential maintenance of schools and grounds, shall Berkeley Unified School District continue its existing special tax of 6.31\u00a2 / square foot on residential buildings and 9.46\u00a2 / square foot on commercial buildings, and $20 on unimproved parcels with annual cost-of-living adjustments for 10 years? Revenues maintain school buildings, classrooms, playgrounds, roofs, electrical systems, and address fire and safety hazards. The state cannot take funds. An independent committee oversees funds.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6267, "fingerprint": "2010|201000391|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000391|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1d5b54491a11f4b4", "measure_id": "201000391", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve school safety and facilities for learning and teaching, shall Berkeley Unified School District issue $210,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to construct new classrooms for growth, complete seismic upgrades, construct science labs, upgrade computers and education technology, renovate playgrounds, replace restrooms, cafeterias, roofs, heating and fire safety systems, remove hazardous materials, improve energy efficiency, and qualify for State grants, with independent audits and citizen oversight? The State cannot take the funds.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31723, "no_votes": 9390, "total_votes": 41113, "percent_yes": 77.16051, "percent_no": 22.839489999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.935712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.112350", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve school safety and facilities for learning and teaching, shall Berkeley Unified School District issue $210,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to construct new classrooms for growth, complete seismic upgrades, construct science labs, upgrade computers and education technology, renovate playgrounds, replace restrooms, cafeterias, roofs, heating and fire safety systems, remove hazardous materials, improve energy efficiency, and qualify for State grants, with independent audits and citizen oversight? The State cannot take the funds.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6268, "fingerprint": "2010|201000392|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000392|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5f09a473df2e1960", "measure_id": "201000392", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Emery Unified School District: maintain academic excellence/student performance, attract and retain quality teachers by: replacing/upgrading outdated schools no longer meeting seismic safety standards; provide updated classrooms, technology, science/computer labs: improve school safety; create energy efficient cost-saving facilities that provide job training, after-school, pre-school, and other community services by issuing $95 million dollars in bonds at legal rates with independent citizens' oversight, audits, and NO money for administrator salaries, benefits, or pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1982, "no_votes": 701, "total_votes": 2683, "percent_yes": 73.87253, "percent_no": 26.127470000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.935999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.112546", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Emery Unified School District: maintain academic excellence/student performance, attract and retain quality teachers by: replacing/upgrading outdated schools no longer meeting seismic safety standards; provide updated classrooms, technology, science/computer labs: improve school safety; create energy efficient cost-saving facilities that provide job training, after-school, pre-school, and other community services by issuing $95 million dollars in bonds at legal rates with independent citizens' oversight, audits, and NO money for administrator salaries, benefits, or pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6269, "fingerprint": "2010|201000393|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000393|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5bc4c00d3574e30b", "measure_id": "201000393", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide Fremont schools stable funding for quality local education and programs that cannot be taken away by the state, including: Maintaining math, science, reading and writing programs; Keeping school libraries open; Supporting classroom/learning technology; Maintaining college and workforce preparation programs; and Retaining qualified teachers -- Shall the Fremont Unified School District levy $53 per parcel annually for 5 years, exempting seniors, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33699, "no_votes": 14381, "total_votes": 48080, "percent_yes": 70.089436, "percent_no": 29.910563999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.936318", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.112741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide Fremont schools stable funding for quality local education and programs that cannot be taken away by the state, including: Maintaining math, science, reading and writing programs; Keeping school libraries open; Supporting classroom/learning technology; Maintaining college and workforce preparation programs; and Retaining qualified teachers -- Shall the Fremont Unified School District levy $53 per parcel annually for 5 years, exempting seniors, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all money benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6270, "fingerprint": "2010|201000394|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000394|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0c546736a2692e59", "measure_id": "201000394", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts, improve student achievement, help every child read at or above grade level, and prepare students for college and careers by retaining teachers, teachers' aides, safety officers and other student support staff, shall Oakland Unified School District levy a tax of $195 per parcel annually for ten years, with low- income taxpayer exemptions, independent audits and citizens' oversight, and no money for Sacramento or administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 70741, "no_votes": 36390, "total_votes": 107131, "percent_yes": 66.03224, "percent_no": 33.96776, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.937390", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.112937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts, improve student achievement, help every child read at or above grade level, and prepare students for college and careers by retaining teachers, teachers' aides, safety officers and other student support staff, shall Oakland Unified School District levy a tax of $195 per parcel annually for ten years, with low- income taxpayer exemptions, independent audits and citizens' oversight, and no money for Sacramento or administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6272, "fingerprint": "2010|201000396|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000396|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0f0240b67a43d0cc", "measure_id": "201000396", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to improve and modernize its schools, renovate athletic facilities including Burrell Field, replace the pools at San Leandro High School, enhance energy efficiency and promote safe, healthy schools for all students, shall the San Leandro Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, acquire and construct school facilities, and issue $50,100,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrator salaries, conduct annual independent audits, and appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10638, "no_votes": 6226, "total_votes": 16864, "percent_yes": 63.08112, "percent_no": 36.91888, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.939097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.113322", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to improve and modernize its schools, renovate athletic facilities including Burrell Field, replace the pools at San Leandro High School, enhance energy efficiency and promote safe, healthy schools for all students, shall the San Leandro Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, acquire and construct school facilities, and issue $50,100,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrator salaries, conduct annual independent audits, and appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6252, "fingerprint": "2010|201000188|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000188|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8e1c95bd2c191a11", "measure_id": "201000188", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve of modifying the Albany City Charter, Section 3.01, as set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide that the City Attorney be elected at the November 2, 2010 election to a one year term and that, in December 2011, the City Attorney be appointed by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3424, "no_votes": 2091, "total_votes": 5515, "percent_yes": 62.085223, "percent_no": 37.914777, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.931113", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.108911", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve of modifying the Albany City Charter, Section 3.01, as set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide that the City Attorney be elected at the November 2, 2010 election to a one year term and that, in December 2011, the City Attorney be appointed by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6253, "fingerprint": "2010|201000189|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000189|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "728c3687b4bbe33f", "measure_id": "201000189", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2010-03 as set forth in the Voter's Pamphlet be adopted to: Reduce the Communications portion of the Utility Users' Tax from 7% to 6.5%; include video in the definition of Communications; modernize the application, calculation, and collection of the Utility Users' Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in the state and federal law; exempt self-generated energy, and prohibit any tax-rate increase without voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4810, "no_votes": 770, "total_votes": 5580, "percent_yes": 86.200714, "percent_no": 13.799285999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.931425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.109197", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2010-03 as set forth in the Voter's Pamphlet be adopted to: Reduce the Communications portion of the Utility Users' Tax from 7% to 6.5%; include video in the definition of Communications; modernize the application, calculation, and collection of the Utility Users' Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in the state and federal law; exempt self-generated energy, and prohibit any tax-rate increase without voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6254, "fingerprint": "2010|201000190|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000190|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "cba082ac12bccb23", "measure_id": "201000190", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Albany Municipal Code, Chapter 4-8 entitled \"Paramedic Advanced Life Support Fire Engines and Ambulance Special Tax\" be amended, as set forth in the Voter Pamphlet, to provide that the City Council may increase the tax commencing in fiscal year 2011-2012 in accordance with the Consumer Price Index for the greater San Francisco area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4169, "no_votes": 1619, "total_votes": 5788, "percent_yes": 72.02833, "percent_no": 27.971670000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.931754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.109477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Albany Municipal Code, Chapter 4-8 entitled \"Paramedic Advanced Life Support Fire Engines and Ambulance Special Tax\" be amended, as set forth in the Voter Pamphlet, to provide that the City Council may increase the tax commencing in fiscal year 2011-2012 in accordance with the Consumer Price Index for the greater San Francisco area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6255, "fingerprint": "2010|201000191|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000191|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "515e1a5eb320038e", "measure_id": "201000191", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve of modifying the Albany Municipal Code, Chapter V, as set forth in the Voter's Pamphlet, to set a business license tax to be paid by cannabis business operating in the City of Albany?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4983, "no_votes": 925, "total_votes": 5908, "percent_yes": 84.34326, "percent_no": 15.65674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.932026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.109763", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve of modifying the Albany Municipal Code, Chapter V, as set forth in the Voter's Pamphlet, to set a business license tax to be paid by cannabis business operating in the City of Albany?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6256, "fingerprint": "2010|201000192|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000192|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d6bc2aee9cab0fdc", "measure_id": "201000192", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Berkeley adopt policies to revitalize the downtown and help make Berkeley one of the greenest cities in the United States by meeting our climate action goals; concentrating housing, jobs and cultural destinations near transit, shops and amenities; preserving historic resources; enhancing open space; promoting green buildings; and calling for 2 residential buildings and 1 hotel no taller than our existing 180 foot buildings and 2 smaller office buidlings up to 120 feet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26120, "no_votes": 14648, "total_votes": 40768, "percent_yes": 64.06986, "percent_no": 35.930139999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.932299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.110061", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Berkeley adopt policies to revitalize the downtown and help make Berkeley one of the greenest cities in the United States by meeting our climate action goals; concentrating housing, jobs and cultural destinations near transit, shops and amenities; preserving historic resources; enhancing open space; promoting green buildings; and calling for 2 residential buildings and 1 hotel no taller than our existing 180 foot buildings and 2 smaller office buidlings up to 120 feet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6257, "fingerprint": "2010|201000193|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000193|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "4813437518849fbe", "measure_id": "201000193", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a tax be authorized on medical cannabis businesses not exceeding $25 per $1000 of gross receipts phased in over two years; on nonprofit medical cannabis businesses not exceeding $25.00 per square foot for the first 3000 square feet and $10 per foot thereafter; and on non-medical cannabis businesses of $100 per $1000 gross receipts; and shall the City's appropriations limit be increased to permit expenditure of these tax proceeds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33260, "no_votes": 6825, "total_votes": 40085, "percent_yes": 82.97368, "percent_no": 17.02632, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.932575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.110344", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a tax be authorized on medical cannabis businesses not exceeding $25 per $1000 of gross receipts phased in over two years; on nonprofit medical cannabis businesses not exceeding $25.00 per square foot for the first 3000 square feet and $10 per foot thereafter; and on non-medical cannabis businesses of $100 per $1000 gross receipts; and shall the City's appropriations limit be increased to permit expenditure of these tax proceeds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6258, "fingerprint": "2010|201000194|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000194|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "07334022e650d279", "measure_id": "201000194", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Berkeley Municipal Code be amended to: allow residential medical cannabis collectives, with up to 200 square feet of cultivation; allow six locations in the Manufacturing District for cultivation; allow a fourth dispensary; require dispensaries to be at least 600' from public and private schools and other dispensaries; permit new and relocated dispensaries only in C districts; change the makeup of the Medical Cannabis Commission; and permit the Council to adopt other amendments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25355, "no_votes": 14069, "total_votes": 39424, "percent_yes": 64.313614, "percent_no": 35.686386, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.932844", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.110587", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Berkeley Municipal Code be amended to: allow residential medical cannabis collectives, with up to 200 square feet of cultivation; allow six locations in the Manufacturing District for cultivation; allow a fourth dispensary; require dispensaries to be at least 600' from public and private schools and other dispensaries; permit new and relocated dispensaries only in C districts; change the makeup of the Medical Cannabis Commission; and permit the Council to adopt other amendments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6259, "fingerprint": "2010|201000195|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000195|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b1c99a5e480f019c", "measure_id": "201000195", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent closure of Silliman Center and elimiation of school police officers and parks/recreation programs; restore public safety services, reopen the Senior Center; and prevent additional cuts to neighborhod patrols, crime prevention, anti-drug/gang-prevention programs, 9-1-1 emergency, and other city services, shall the City of Newark establish a 3.5% utility users tax for 5 years, exempting seniors and low-income residents, requiring independent audits, with no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5850, "no_votes": 4115, "total_votes": 9965, "percent_yes": 58.705467, "percent_no": 41.294533, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.933374", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.110788", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent closure of Silliman Center and elimiation of school police officers and parks/recreation programs; restore public safety services, reopen the Senior Center; and prevent additional cuts to neighborhod patrols, crime prevention, anti-drug/gang-prevention programs, 9-1-1 emergency, and other city services, shall the City of Newark establish a 3.5% utility users tax for 5 years, exempting seniors and low-income residents, requiring independent audits, with no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6261, "fingerprint": "2010|201000197|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000197|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "dfce69d17f33de14", "measure_id": "201000197", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to increase the business tax rate for \"Medical Cannabis Businesses\" from $18 per $1,000 of gross receipts to $50 per $1,000 of gross receipts, and creating a new \"Non-Medical Cannabis Business Tax\" of $100 per $1,000 of gross receipts, with all proceeds placed in the City's general Fund to be used for any governmental purpose?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 74413, "no_votes": 31148, "total_votes": 105561, "percent_yes": 70.49289, "percent_no": 29.507109999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.933931", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.111177", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to increase the business tax rate for \"Medical Cannabis Businesses\" from $18 per $1,000 of gross receipts to $50 per $1,000 of gross receipts, and creating a new \"Non-Medical Cannabis Business Tax\" of $100 per $1,000 of gross receipts, with all proceeds placed in the City's general Fund to be used for any governmental purpose?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6262, "fingerprint": "2010|201000198|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000198|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d9d685f4bd7ad369", "measure_id": "201000198", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support vital city services including public safety, library services, and parks and recreation, shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to establish a telephone \"access line\" tax at a rate of $1.99 per month per access line and $13 per month per \"trunk line\" with all proceeds placed in the City's General Fund subject to annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45732, "no_votes": 58349, "total_votes": 104081, "percent_yes": 43.938854, "percent_no": 56.061146, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.934203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.111375", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support vital city services including public safety, library services, and parks and recreation, shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to establish a telephone \"access line\" tax at a rate of $1.99 per month per access line and $13 per month per \"trunk line\" with all proceeds placed in the City's General Fund subject to annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6263, "fingerprint": "2010|201000199|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000199|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "cde1d75a1bf69ca6", "measure_id": "201000199", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To support, protect and enhance vital public safety and violence prevention services including violence reduction programs, shall the City of Oakland levy a $360 per single family rsidential unit parcel tax for 4 1/2 years which is subject to annual reviews of all funds, and rigorous oversight by a citizens committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28788, "no_votes": 75068, "total_votes": 103856, "percent_yes": 27.71915, "percent_no": 72.28085, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.934472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.111573", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support, protect and enhance vital public safety and violence prevention services including violence reduction programs, shall the City of Oakland levy a $360 per single family rsidential unit parcel tax for 4 1/2 years which is subject to annual reviews of all funds, and rigorous oversight by a citizens committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6264, "fingerprint": "2010|201000200|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000200|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "11f80236d0e1d8be", "measure_id": "201000200", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect and maintain local services, such as fire and 9-1-1 emergency response times, neighborhood police patrols, investigation and gang suppression officers, library hours/program, street and pothole repairs, youth after-school and senior programs, and other general City services, shall the City of San Leandro enact a quarter-cent sales tax, for seven years, reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, annual independent audits, and all funds for San Leandro and no funds for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12630, "no_votes": 8037, "total_votes": 20667, "percent_yes": 61.111915, "percent_no": 38.888085, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.934771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.111764", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect and maintain local services, such as fire and 9-1-1 emergency response times, neighborhood police patrols, investigation and gang suppression officers, library hours/program, street and pothole repairs, youth after-school and senior programs, and other general City services, shall the City of San Leandro enact a quarter-cent sales tax, for seven years, reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, annual independent audits, and all funds for San Leandro and no funds for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6273, "fingerprint": "2010|201000051|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000051|AMADOR", "content_hash": "5b8dca8e7aed940d", "measure_id": "201000051", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should Resolution 09-10-16 of the Sutter Creek City Council approving the Gold Rush Ranch Specific Plan, General Plan Amendments, and Phased Vesting Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, be adopted to authorize development of a public golf course, a hotel, timeshares, residential units and various commerical uses and requiring provision at developer expense of communty park, open space, trails, sewer plant and donation of land and funds for community use?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 658, "no_votes": 642, "total_votes": 1300, "percent_yes": 50.61538, "percent_no": 49.38462, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.939554", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.113520", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Resolution 09-10-16 of the Sutter Creek City Council approving the Gold Rush Ranch Specific Plan, General Plan Amendments, and Phased Vesting Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, be adopted to authorize development of a public golf course, a hotel, timeshares, residential units and various commerical uses and requiring provision at developer expense of communty park, open space, trails, sewer plant and donation of land and funds for community use?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6274, "fingerprint": "2010|201000202|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000202|AMADOR", "content_hash": "b8ad5c3ef5e9084d", "measure_id": "201000202", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Plymouth Ordinance No. 2010-02 increasing the transient occupancy tax to ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by hotel operators within the city limits, with tax revenue to be used for general municipal purposes, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 151, "no_votes": 185, "total_votes": 336, "percent_yes": 44.940478, "percent_no": 55.059522, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.940565", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.113714", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Plymouth Ordinance No. 2010-02 increasing the transient occupancy tax to ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by hotel operators within the city limits, with tax revenue to be used for general municipal purposes, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6275, "fingerprint": "2010|201000203|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000203|AMADOR", "content_hash": "8445e7b356bbb4c5", "measure_id": "201000203", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should two percent (2%) of revenue from the increase in the transient occupancy tax be used for streets, parking and landscaping, and the remaining two percent (2%) for tourism including promotions, events, signage, advertising, and other related expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 176, "no_votes": 151, "total_votes": 327, "percent_yes": 53.82263, "percent_no": 46.17737, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.941423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.113907", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should two percent (2%) of revenue from the increase in the transient occupancy tax be used for streets, parking and landscaping, and the remaining two percent (2%) for tourism including promotions, events, signage, advertising, and other related expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6276, "fingerprint": "2010|201000204|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000204|BUTTE", "content_hash": "84ce04da1e053266", "measure_id": "201000204", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1960 be adopted to reduce the City of Oroville utility user's tax for telecommunications and video services from 5% to 4.5% and to update telecommunication service definitions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2239, "no_votes": 820, "total_votes": 3059, "percent_yes": 73.193854, "percent_no": 26.806146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.942190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.114098", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1960 be adopted to reduce the City of Oroville utility user's tax for telecommunications and video services from 5% to 4.5% and to update telecommunication service definitions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6277, "fingerprint": "2010|201000205|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000205|COLUSA", "content_hash": "d95fc8f64502824a", "measure_id": "201000205", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance which increases the rate of the City\u2019s transient occupancy tax from ten percent of the rent charged by a hotel to twelve percent of the rent charged, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233, "no_votes": 367, "total_votes": 600, "percent_yes": 38.833332, "percent_no": 61.166668, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.943229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.114292", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance which increases the rate of the City\u2019s transient occupancy tax from ten percent of the rent charged by a hotel to twelve percent of the rent charged, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6278, "fingerprint": "2010|201000206|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000206|COLUSA", "content_hash": "4d1a554c869cce30", "measure_id": "201000206", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk and city treasurer be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 249, "no_votes": 341, "total_votes": 590, "percent_yes": 42.20339, "percent_no": 57.79661, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.943657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.114493", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk and city treasurer be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6279, "fingerprint": "2010|201000018|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000018|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "52e67f109b082fb2", "measure_id": "201000018", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To avoid the severe loss of science, foreign language, English, social studies, the arts, and mathematics classes due to continuing deep cuts in the state's budget, and to provide students with high-quality programs and services, shall the Acalanes Union High School District be authorized to collect an emergency special tax at an annual cost of $112 per parcel for five years beginning July 1, 2010, with a citizens' overisght committee, and offering a senior exemption?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27487, "no_votes": 12647, "total_votes": 40134, "percent_yes": 68.48807000000001, "percent_no": 31.511929999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.943969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.114683", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid the severe loss of science, foreign language, English, social studies, the arts, and mathematics classes due to continuing deep cuts in the state's budget, and to provide students with high-quality programs and services, shall the Acalanes Union High School District be authorized to collect an emergency special tax at an annual cost of $112 per parcel for five years beginning July 1, 2010, with a citizens' overisght committee, and offering a senior exemption?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6282, "fingerprint": "2010|201000098|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000098|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f765056114626312", "measure_id": "201000098", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support quality education and safety for local students, and reduce impacts of State budget cuts by improving sciences, career and technical education facilities; upgrading classroom instructional technology; repairing leaky roofs; improving safety; maximizing energy efficiency including adding solar panels and modern air conditioning; and repairing, replacing, equipping or modernizing other school facilities; shall Mt. Diablo Unified School District issue $348,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32152, "no_votes": 20662, "total_votes": 52814, "percent_yes": 60.87780000000001, "percent_no": 39.12219999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.945001", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.115260", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support quality education and safety for local students, and reduce impacts of State budget cuts by improving sciences, career and technical education facilities; upgrading classroom instructional technology; repairing leaky roofs; improving safety; maximizing energy efficiency including adding solar panels and modern air conditioning; and repairing, replacing, equipping or modernizing other school facilities; shall Mt. Diablo Unified School District issue $348,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6283, "fingerprint": "2010|201000099|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000099|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "37f7cc017785a46d", "measure_id": "201000099", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make schools safe, complete essential health/safety repairs, qualify for state matching grants, shall West Contra Costa Unified Schol District upgrade schools for earthquake safety/handicap accessibility, remove asbestos, upgrade classrooms, vocational classrooms/technology/energy systems to reduce costs, install lighting and security systems, acquire, repair, construct, equipment/sites/facilities, by issuing $380,000,000 in bonds within legal rates and bonding capacity limits with independent audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23014, "no_votes": 13740, "total_votes": 36754, "percent_yes": 62.61631, "percent_no": 37.38369, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.945299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.115452", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make schools safe, complete essential health/safety repairs, qualify for state matching grants, shall West Contra Costa Unified Schol District upgrade schools for earthquake safety/handicap accessibility, remove asbestos, upgrade classrooms, vocational classrooms/technology/energy systems to reduce costs, install lighting and security systems, acquire, repair, construct, equipment/sites/facilities, by issuing $380,000,000 in bonds within legal rates and bonding capacity limits with independent audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6280, "fingerprint": "2010|201000030|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000030|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "daea8b6d0ab6eb4f", "measure_id": "201000030", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Adopting a City of Brentwood Voter Approved Urban Limit Line; Permitting Mixed Use Development; and Providing Funds for jobs, Sports and Recreational Fields and Public Safety be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4251, "no_votes": 5702, "total_votes": 9953, "percent_yes": 42.71074, "percent_no": 57.28926, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.944360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.114878", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Adopting a City of Brentwood Voter Approved Urban Limit Line; Permitting Mixed Use Development; and Providing Funds for jobs, Sports and Recreational Fields and Public Safety be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6281, "fingerprint": "2010|201000031|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000031|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "fcbfebb5a5330f88", "measure_id": "201000031", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District Ordinance No.2010-01, which imposes a Supplemental Special Tax for Kensington Police Department services in an initial annual amount of not to exceed $200.00 for single family residential parcels, subject to CPI, with amounts for properties in other use categories identified in the ordinance, commencing FY 2010/11, be approved and shall the District appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1478, "no_votes": 677, "total_votes": 2155, "percent_yes": 68.584687, "percent_no": 31.415312999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.944703", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.115069", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District Ordinance No.2010-01, which imposes a Supplemental Special Tax for Kensington Police Department services in an initial annual amount of not to exceed $200.00 for single family residential parcels, subject to CPI, with amounts for properties in other use categories identified in the ordinance, commencing FY 2010/11, be approved and shall the District appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6292, "fingerprint": "2010|201000397|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000397|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "82408ba4af6f2284", "measure_id": "201000397", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve academic programs including math, science, reading and writing; fund computer technology, music and arts; retain highly qualified teachers; shall John Swett Unified School District levy a special tax of $96 per parcel, except for industrial/commercial parcels which are levied at $0.015 per square foot (see voter pamphlet), with citizens' oversight, senior exemption and all funds spent at neighborhood schools and not taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2368, "no_votes": 1992, "total_votes": 4360, "percent_yes": 54.311925, "percent_no": 45.688075, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.948176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.117238", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve academic programs including math, science, reading and writing; fund computer technology, music and arts; retain highly qualified teachers; shall John Swett Unified School District levy a special tax of $96 per parcel, except for industrial/commercial parcels which are levied at $0.015 per square foot (see voter pamphlet), with citizens' oversight, senior exemption and all funds spent at neighborhood schools and not taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6294, "fingerprint": "2010|201000399|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000399|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3cf8851fa5db678e", "measure_id": "201000399", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify for State grants; install solar energy improvements; provide and upgrade classrooms; rehabilitate infrastructure; improve school grounds; enhance Alhambra's performing arts building; add culinary arts, career and technical education classrooms, and furnish computers and other electronic equipment, shall Martinez Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $45,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, independent annual performance and financial audits and no increase in the estimated tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6863, "no_votes": 3611, "total_votes": 10474, "percent_yes": 65.524155, "percent_no": 34.47584500000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.948919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.117626", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify for State grants; install solar energy improvements; provide and upgrade classrooms; rehabilitate infrastructure; improve school grounds; enhance Alhambra's performing arts building; add culinary arts, career and technical education classrooms, and furnish computers and other electronic equipment, shall Martinez Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $45,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, independent annual performance and financial audits and no increase in the estimated tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6295, "fingerprint": "2010|201000400|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000400|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2bf8f5cd5c3a79e1", "measure_id": "201000400", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe, modern neighborhood schools with updated energy systems, including solar, reduce cost, improve student learning by acquiring, upgrading, constructing, equipping classrooms, science and computer labs, and school facilities, replace aging roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation/ electrical systems, improve fire alarms, school security and earthquake safety, shall Pittsburg Unified School District issue $100,000,000 of bonds, within legal rates and state approved bonding capacity limits with independent oversight, no administrators' salaries, keeping funds local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7391, "no_votes": 3396, "total_votes": 10787, "percent_yes": 68.51766, "percent_no": 31.482339999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.949214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.117818", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe, modern neighborhood schools with updated energy systems, including solar, reduce cost, improve student learning by acquiring, upgrading, constructing, equipping classrooms, science and computer labs, and school facilities, replace aging roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation/ electrical systems, improve fire alarms, school security and earthquake safety, shall Pittsburg Unified School District issue $100,000,000 of bonds, within legal rates and state approved bonding capacity limits with independent oversight, no administrators' salaries, keeping funds local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6296, "fingerprint": "2010|201000401|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000401|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "da412ee8bc9990d3", "measure_id": "201000401", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide local funding the State cannot take away, and preserve quality education by: providing manageable class sizes to improve core academics like math, science, reading/ writing, restoring arts/ music programs, attracting/ retaining quality teachers, improving campus safety/ cleanliness, preparing students for college and workforce, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District charge an annual tax of 7.2 cents per square foot of building area, or $7.20 per vacant parcel for five years, exempting seniors and requiring independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35078, "no_votes": 24017, "total_votes": 59095, "percent_yes": 59.35865999999999, "percent_no": 40.64134000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.949510", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.118012", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide local funding the State cannot take away, and preserve quality education by: providing manageable class sizes to improve core academics like math, science, reading/ writing, restoring arts/ music programs, attracting/ retaining quality teachers, improving campus safety/ cleanliness, preparing students for college and workforce, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District charge an annual tax of 7.2 cents per square foot of building area, or $7.20 per vacant parcel for five years, exempting seniors and requiring independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6293, "fingerprint": "2010|201000398|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000398|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8a1651d94cf03d7c", "measure_id": "201000398", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classrooms with up-to-date computers and technology infrastructure; repair and replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing and restrooms, and improve the District's budget, preserve school programs and retain teachers by paying lease obligations relating to existing school facility debt; shall Knightsen Elementary School District be authorized to issue $5 million of bonds within legal interest rates, so long as there is independent local citizens' oversight and funds cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 375, "no_votes": 309, "total_votes": 684, "percent_yes": 54.82456, "percent_no": 45.17544, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.948578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.117433", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classrooms with up-to-date computers and technology infrastructure; repair and replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing and restrooms, and improve the District's budget, preserve school programs and retain teachers by paying lease obligations relating to existing school facility debt; shall Knightsen Elementary School District be authorized to issue $5 million of bonds within legal interest rates, so long as there is independent local citizens' oversight and funds cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6284, "fingerprint": "2010|201000207|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000207|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "18d1724293e8c978", "measure_id": "201000207", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To avoid further severe cuts to all city services including police layoffs and maintaining neighborhood police patrols and 911 emergency response, fixing potholes and maintaining local streets and sidewalks, restoring code enforcement, and cleaning up abandoned properties; shall the City of Antioch adopt a one-half cent transaction and use (sales) tax, expiring in eight years, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizens' oversight and for local Antioch use only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11119, "no_votes": 11969, "total_votes": 23088, "percent_yes": 48.159218, "percent_no": 51.840782, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.945654", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.115650", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid further severe cuts to all city services including police layoffs and maintaining neighborhood police patrols and 911 emergency response, fixing potholes and maintaining local streets and sidewalks, restoring code enforcement, and cleaning up abandoned properties; shall the City of Antioch adopt a one-half cent transaction and use (sales) tax, expiring in eight years, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizens' oversight and for local Antioch use only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6285, "fingerprint": "2010|201000208|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000208|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "c1a57216ddd232d3", "measure_id": "201000208", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding that cannot be taken by the State and help protect/maintain Concord's city services, including 911 emergency response times, police officers, gang prevention, crime investigation, neighborhood police patrols, city streets/pothole repair, senior services and nutrition programs, youth/teen programs, and other general city services shall the City of Concord enact a half-cent sales tax for 5 years, with citizens oversight, mandatory financial audits, reports to the community, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18250, "no_votes": 15332, "total_votes": 33582, "percent_yes": 54.34459, "percent_no": 45.65541, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.945987", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.115845", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding that cannot be taken by the State and help protect/maintain Concord's city services, including 911 emergency response times, police officers, gang prevention, crime investigation, neighborhood police patrols, city streets/pothole repair, senior services and nutrition programs, youth/teen programs, and other general city services shall the City of Concord enact a half-cent sales tax for 5 years, with citizens oversight, mandatory financial audits, reports to the community, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6286, "fingerprint": "2010|201000209|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000209|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "9f27506352f07315", "measure_id": "201000209", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect and maintain City services, including fire prevention and emergency services; neighborhood police patrols, emergency response times, crime prevention and investigation resources; firefighter and police staffing; earthquake preparedness; afterschool programs for children and teens; senior services; parks; and other general City services: Shall the City of El Cerrito enact a half-cent sales tax for seven years, with citizens oversight, annual independent audits, and all other funds staying local, none to Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5834, "no_votes": 4139, "total_votes": 9973, "percent_yes": 58.49794000000001, "percent_no": 41.50205999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.946284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.116036", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect and maintain City services, including fire prevention and emergency services; neighborhood police patrols, emergency response times, crime prevention and investigation resources; firefighter and police staffing; earthquake preparedness; afterschool programs for children and teens; senior services; parks; and other general City services: Shall the City of El Cerrito enact a half-cent sales tax for seven years, with citizens oversight, annual independent audits, and all other funds staying local, none to Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6287, "fingerprint": "2010|201000210|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000210|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e8ef8708cf3f95d3", "measure_id": "201000210", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue essential public services to the residents of Pinole, shall an ordinance be adopted to amend Section 3.26.180 of the Pinole Municipal Code to extend the existing Utility User Tax of eight percent for an additional eight years until December 31, 2020 and to include a new utility users tax on water utility services at the existing tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2761, "no_votes": 3408, "total_votes": 6169, "percent_yes": 44.756037, "percent_no": 55.243963, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.946663", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.116234", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue essential public services to the residents of Pinole, shall an ordinance be adopted to amend Section 3.26.180 of the Pinole Municipal Code to extend the existing Utility User Tax of eight percent for an additional eight years until December 31, 2020 and to include a new utility users tax on water utility services at the existing tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6288, "fingerprint": "2010|201000211|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000211|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e34c99fcc229e16c", "measure_id": "201000211", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect the quality of life in Pleasant Hill, to provide stable funding the State cannot take away, and minimze cuts to general city services including rapid emergency response, police/neighborhood patrols, repairing potholes/roads and maintaining library hours, shall an ordinance be adopted expanding the City of Pleasant Hill's existing utility users tax to additional utilities (described in the ballot pamphlet), capping the rate at 1.5%, providing specified exemptions/energy efficiency incentives and requiring that funds remain local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5237, "no_votes": 6672, "total_votes": 11909, "percent_yes": 43.975145, "percent_no": 56.024855, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.946997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.116431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of life in Pleasant Hill, to provide stable funding the State cannot take away, and minimze cuts to general city services including rapid emergency response, police/neighborhood patrols, repairing potholes/roads and maintaining library hours, shall an ordinance be adopted expanding the City of Pleasant Hill's existing utility users tax to additional utilities (described in the ballot pamphlet), capping the rate at 1.5%, providing specified exemptions/energy efficiency incentives and requiring that funds remain local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6289, "fingerprint": "2010|201000212|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000212|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "767d2a55b1cb1908", "measure_id": "201000212", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Richmond approve a project including a casino at Pt. Molate provided that this advisory measure is considered in a manner consistent with all the City's legal obligations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10007, "no_votes": 13991, "total_votes": 23998, "percent_yes": 41.699308, "percent_no": 58.300692, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.947292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.116656", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Richmond approve a project including a casino at Pt. Molate provided that this advisory measure is considered in a manner consistent with all the City's legal obligations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6290, "fingerprint": "2010|201000213|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000213|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "c37d0cf3c729bbc9", "measure_id": "201000213", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Richmond Business License Tax to provide that every person engaged in a marijuana business pay a general business license tax of five percent (5%) of its gross receipts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18050, "no_votes": 4980, "total_votes": 23030, "percent_yes": 78.37603, "percent_no": 21.62397, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.947587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.116847", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Richmond Business License Tax to provide that every person engaged in a marijuana business pay a general business license tax of five percent (5%) of its gross receipts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6291, "fingerprint": "2010|201000214|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000214|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "462cd37a56c2f578", "measure_id": "201000214", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To plan for the future, shall an ordinance be adopted to: approve General Plan 2030; extend Ordinance 197 policies and procedures to protect ridgelines, creeks, and open space; expand the Ridgeline Creek Protection Zone map; and extend the Urban Growth Boundary to enhance local control while preserving our quality of life?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5946, "no_votes": 14826, "total_votes": 20772, "percent_yes": 28.62507, "percent_no": 71.37493, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.947880", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.117041", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To plan for the future, shall an ordinance be adopted to: approve General Plan 2030; extend Ordinance 197 policies and procedures to protect ridgelines, creeks, and open space; expand the Ridgeline Creek Protection Zone map; and extend the Urban Growth Boundary to enhance local control while preserving our quality of life?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6297, "fingerprint": "2010|201000215|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000215|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "56a449d558f1609b", "measure_id": "201000215", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an Initiative Measure prohibiting the City of Crescent City from using the public water system to deliver any product, substance, device, element, medicine or preventative agent, including flouride with the intent or purpose of affecting the physical or mental functions of any water consumer be enacted into law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 418, "no_votes": 555, "total_votes": 973, "percent_yes": 42.959917, "percent_no": 57.040083, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.949805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.118207", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an Initiative Measure prohibiting the City of Crescent City from using the public water system to deliver any product, substance, device, element, medicine or preventative agent, including flouride with the intent or purpose of affecting the physical or mental functions of any water consumer be enacted into law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6298, "fingerprint": "2010|201000139|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000139|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "98078526c1617be7", "measure_id": "201000139", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": " Shall Mike Kraft be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 252, "no_votes": 61, "total_votes": 313, "percent_yes": 80.51118000000001, "percent_no": 19.48881999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-31", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.950167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.118398", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": " Shall Mike Kraft be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6299, "fingerprint": "2010|201000140|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000140|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a8c55f6b10bc6b75", "measure_id": "201000140", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Eric Thaden be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 253, "no_votes": 59, "total_votes": 312, "percent_yes": 81.08974, "percent_no": 18.910259999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-31", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.950501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.118589", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Eric Thaden be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6300, "fingerprint": "2010|201000148|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000148|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "8980def7cd1eca7e", "measure_id": "201000148", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special tax be levied within the Cameron Estates Community Services District pursuant to Board Resolution No. 2010-03 for providing road improvements, upgrades, and maintenance according to the following schedule: A. Residential property: an increase of $125.00 over the current assessment of $250.00 for a total amount of $375.00 per year per residential parcel? B. Commercial property, described as parcels 109-111-14-100, 109-111-15-100, 109-111-16-100, 109-111-17-100 and 109-111-18-100: an amount of $1,125.00 per parcel per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 252, "no_votes": 201, "total_votes": 453, "percent_yes": 55.62914, "percent_no": 44.37086, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.950792", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.118781", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax be levied within the Cameron Estates Community Services District pursuant to Board Resolution No. 2010-03 for providing road improvements, upgrades, and maintenance according to the following schedule: A. Residential property: an increase of $125.00 over the current assessment of $250.00 for a total amount of $375.00 per year per residential parcel? B. Commercial property, described as parcels 109-111-14-100, 109-111-15-100, 109-111-16-100, 109-111-17-100 and 109-111-18-100: an amount of $1,125.00 per parcel per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6303, "fingerprint": "2010|201000217|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000217|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "e340905cf9d7f3ee", "measure_id": "201000217", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance that amends the methods for calculating certain business taxes in the City of South Lake Tahoe to increase locally controlled revenue for city services and operations such as, police, fire, paramedics, snow removal, parks, and street repair by reducing the percentage of taxes paid on gross revenues and increasing the not to exceed amount from $3,387 to $10,000 per calendar year, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2010, "no_votes": 2076, "total_votes": 4086, "percent_yes": 49.192363, "percent_no": 50.807637, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.952047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.119365", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance that amends the methods for calculating certain business taxes in the City of South Lake Tahoe to increase locally controlled revenue for city services and operations such as, police, fire, paramedics, snow removal, parks, and street repair by reducing the percentage of taxes paid on gross revenues and increasing the not to exceed amount from $3,387 to $10,000 per calendar year, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6301, "fingerprint": "2010|201000149|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000149|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "62051301498974b7", "measure_id": "201000149", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Section 602 of the El Dorado County Charter, which currently requires the procurement of all services to be pursuant to a written contract, be amended to provide the Board of Supervisors with the authority to allow the procurement of services for less than $15,000.00 without the need for a written contract; provided, that the Board of Supervisors does so by ordinance which specifies alternate procedures for processing and documenting the purchases?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33621, "no_votes": 35231, "total_votes": 68852, "percent_yes": 48.830825, "percent_no": 51.169175, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.951086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.118977", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 602 of the El Dorado County Charter, which currently requires the procurement of all services to be pursuant to a written contract, be amended to provide the Board of Supervisors with the authority to allow the procurement of services for less than $15,000.00 without the need for a written contract; provided, that the Board of Supervisors does so by ordinance which specifies alternate procedures for processing and documenting the purchases?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6302, "fingerprint": "2010|201000216|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000216|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "eb560f4c84c8d839", "measure_id": "201000216", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help pay for the State-mandated Wastewater Plant upgrade debt and water and sewer line replacements, which would help reduce water and/or sewer rates in the City, shall the City of Placerville adopt an add-on sales tax (transactions and use tax) of one-quarter percent (.25%) for 30 years, with all proceeds going only to local water and/or wastewater debt service and water and/or wastewater construction projects, with annual oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2654, "no_votes": 884, "total_votes": 3538, "percent_yes": 75.01413, "percent_no": 24.985870000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.951377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.119170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help pay for the State-mandated Wastewater Plant upgrade debt and water and sewer line replacements, which would help reduce water and/or sewer rates in the City, shall the City of Placerville adopt an add-on sales tax (transactions and use tax) of one-quarter percent (.25%) for 30 years, with all proceeds going only to local water and/or wastewater debt service and water and/or wastewater construction projects, with annual oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6304, "fingerprint": "2010|201000052|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000052|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f45bdf3894931539", "measure_id": "201000052", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Section 1504, which requires the automatic addition of two new City Council offices when Fresno's population reaches 540,000, be amended to include a public review process and require City Council and voter approval prior to adding two new Council offices when Fresno's population reaches 650,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34272, "no_votes": 18661, "total_votes": 52933, "percent_yes": 64.74600000000001, "percent_no": 35.25399999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.952422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.119557", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Section 1504, which requires the automatic addition of two new City Council offices when Fresno's population reaches 540,000, be amended to include a public review process and require City Council and voter approval prior to adding two new Council offices when Fresno's population reaches 650,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6311, "fingerprint": "2010|201000402|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000402|FRESNO", "content_hash": "96823de4ac0de39c", "measure_id": "201000402", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace inadequate electrical and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; upgrade computers and technology; improve energy efficiency; and make health and safety improvements shall the Coalinga-Huran Joint Unified School District issue $16,100,000 of existing bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1810, "no_votes": 1030, "total_votes": 2840, "percent_yes": 63.73239, "percent_no": 36.26761, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.954595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.120909", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace inadequate electrical and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; upgrade computers and technology; improve energy efficiency; and make health and safety improvements shall the Coalinga-Huran Joint Unified School District issue $16,100,000 of existing bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6308, "fingerprint": "2010|201000218|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000218|FRESNO", "content_hash": "609caa140d6ecaa2", "measure_id": "201000218", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Reedley be authorized to amend the City's existing Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance to make the existing 8.0% tax applicable to all hotels, motels, bed and breakfast inns, and inns in the City with four or more rooms, and all recreational vehicle campgrounds in the City with accommodations for six or more recreational vehicles, as set forth in Ordinance No.2010-05.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1922, "no_votes": 2255, "total_votes": 4177, "percent_yes": 46.013886, "percent_no": 53.986114, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.953621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.120333", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Reedley be authorized to amend the City's existing Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance to make the existing 8.0% tax applicable to all hotels, motels, bed and breakfast inns, and inns in the City with four or more rooms, and all recreational vehicle campgrounds in the City with accommodations for six or more recreational vehicles, as set forth in Ordinance No.2010-05.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6306, "fingerprint": "2010|201000054|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000054|FRESNO", "content_hash": "40f719b66360c364", "measure_id": "201000054", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund parks and recreation, arts and cultural programs and general governmental purposes, shall the City of Selma increase the transient occupancy tax for staying in any hotel, motel or lodging, from 6% to 12%? The revenue received from the 6% increase will be used to fund parks and recreation - 50%, arts and cultural programs - 20%, and general governmental purposes - 30%.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1097, "no_votes": 829, "total_votes": 1926, "percent_yes": 56.957424, "percent_no": 43.042576, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.953029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.119945", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund parks and recreation, arts and cultural programs and general governmental purposes, shall the City of Selma increase the transient occupancy tax for staying in any hotel, motel or lodging, from 6% to 12%? The revenue received from the 6% increase will be used to fund parks and recreation - 50%, arts and cultural programs - 20%, and general governmental purposes - 30%.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6310, "fingerprint": "2010|201000220|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000220|FRESNO", "content_hash": "4f3749d5b26201dd", "measure_id": "201000220", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of Sanger be elected by four (4) single member districts as described in Sanger Ordinance No.1113 and the Mayor elected by direct vote of all the City's electors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2288, "no_votes": 1718, "total_votes": 4006, "percent_yes": 57.114327, "percent_no": 42.885673, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.954253", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.120715", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of Sanger be elected by four (4) single member districts as described in Sanger Ordinance No.1113 and the Mayor elected by direct vote of all the City's electors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6305, "fingerprint": "2010|201000053|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000053|FRESNO", "content_hash": "36d985b0223a3fbf", "measure_id": "201000053", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Orange Cove eliminate the elected Mayor provisions of the Municipal Code and amend the Municipal Code to provide for a Mayor that is appointed by the Council after each General Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 321, "no_votes": 385, "total_votes": 706, "percent_yes": 45.46742, "percent_no": 54.53258, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.952729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.119752", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Orange Cove eliminate the elected Mayor provisions of the Municipal Code and amend the Municipal Code to provide for a Mayor that is appointed by the Council after each General Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6307, "fingerprint": "2010|201000100|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000100|FRESNO", "content_hash": "5a7b77a30eeb1685", "measure_id": "201000100", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activites including sports, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $97.00 per parcel annually, with annual cost of living adjustments, so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22, "no_votes": 129, "total_votes": 151, "percent_yes": 14.569536, "percent_no": 85.430464, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.953325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.120139", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activites including sports, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $97.00 per parcel annually, with annual cost of living adjustments, so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6314, "fingerprint": "2010|201000405|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000405|FRESNO", "content_hash": "50a3127c0fcd011d", "measure_id": "201000405", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset state budget cuts, attract quality teachers, and repair classrooms by: Upgrading vocational education classrooms / science labs / technology / libraries; improving security / fire safety / restrooms / plumbing / ventilation systems; Increasing handicapped access; Securing state matching funds; Replacing deteriorating portables; Preventing dropouts by improving alternative schools; Acquiring, constructing, repairing campuses / facilities / equipment; Shall Fresno Unified School District issue $280 million in bonds requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, no money for Sacramento, and no tax rate increase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51125, "no_votes": 16397, "total_votes": 67522, "percent_yes": 75.71606, "percent_no": 24.28394, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.955472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.121497", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset state budget cuts, attract quality teachers, and repair classrooms by: Upgrading vocational education classrooms / science labs / technology / libraries; improving security / fire safety / restrooms / plumbing / ventilation systems; Increasing handicapped access; Securing state matching funds; Replacing deteriorating portables; Preventing dropouts by improving alternative schools; Acquiring, constructing, repairing campuses / facilities / equipment; Shall Fresno Unified School District issue $280 million in bonds requiring audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, no money for Sacramento, and no tax rate increase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6309, "fingerprint": "2010|201000219|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000219|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201000219", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143, "no_votes": 109, "total_votes": 252, "percent_yes": 56.746030000000005, "percent_no": 43.253969999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.953913", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.120525", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6316, "fingerprint": "2010|201000407|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000407|FRESNO", "content_hash": "03fc896c3b2589ef", "measure_id": "201000407", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade calssrooms with up-to-date computers and technology; repair and replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing and restrooms; install fire alarms, remove asbestos, and improve the District's budget, preserve school programs and retain teachers by paying off existing school facility debt; shall Sierra Unified School District School Facilities District No.1 be authorized to issue $9.6 million of bonds within legal interest rates, so long as there is independent local citizens' oversight and funds cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2087, "no_votes": 2140, "total_votes": 4227, "percent_yes": 49.373078, "percent_no": 50.626922, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.956182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.121884", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade calssrooms with up-to-date computers and technology; repair and replace deteriorating roofs, plumbing and restrooms; install fire alarms, remove asbestos, and improve the District's budget, preserve school programs and retain teachers by paying off existing school facility debt; shall Sierra Unified School District School Facilities District No.1 be authorized to issue $9.6 million of bonds within legal interest rates, so long as there is independent local citizens' oversight and funds cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6312, "fingerprint": "2010|201000403|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000403|FRESNO", "content_hash": "1c7f1000ba7bdfca", "measure_id": "201000403", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, construct, modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities; make health and safety improvements; update sports facilities; improve student access to computer and modern technology; improvement to kitchen facilities; and construct a local gymnasium for school and community use; shall the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring a citizens' oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57, "no_votes": 167, "total_votes": 224, "percent_yes": 25.44643, "percent_no": 74.55357000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.954890", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.121106", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, construct, modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities; make health and safety improvements; update sports facilities; improve student access to computer and modern technology; improvement to kitchen facilities; and construct a local gymnasium for school and community use; shall the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring a citizens' oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6313, "fingerprint": "2010|201000404|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000404|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3545ebb273dd283d", "measure_id": "201000404", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $89.00 per parcel annually, with annual cost of living adjustments, so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28, "no_votes": 193, "total_votes": 221, "percent_yes": 12.669684, "percent_no": 87.330316, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.955181", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.121304", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $89.00 per parcel annually, with annual cost of living adjustments, so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6315, "fingerprint": "2010|201000406|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000406|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b6229beecd1057c0", "measure_id": "201000406", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the territory of the American Union Elementary School District and the Washington Union High School District be unified, with Orange Center, Pacific Union, Washington Colony, West Fresno and West Park elementary school districts excluded from the unification, and be governed by a seven member Board of Trustees elected by trustee area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1844, "no_votes": 1150, "total_votes": 2994, "percent_yes": 61.58985, "percent_no": 38.41015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.955854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.121690", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the territory of the American Union Elementary School District and the Washington Union High School District be unified, with Orange Center, Pacific Union, Washington Colony, West Fresno and West Park elementary school districts excluded from the unification, and be governed by a seven member Board of Trustees elected by trustee area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6317, "fingerprint": "2010|201000408|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000408|GLENN", "content_hash": "9ba92ea5c7723355", "measure_id": "201000408", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve energy efficiency; make health and safety imrprovements; improve student access to computers and modern technology; replace dilapidated temporary portables with permanent classrooms; and renovate physical education fields and facilities for school and community use, shall Hamilton Unified School District issue $5,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 372, "no_votes": 332, "total_votes": 704, "percent_yes": 52.840906, "percent_no": 47.159094, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.956478", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.122078", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; improve energy efficiency; make health and safety imrprovements; improve student access to computers and modern technology; replace dilapidated temporary portables with permanent classrooms; and renovate physical education fields and facilities for school and community use, shall Hamilton Unified School District issue $5,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6318, "fingerprint": "2010|201000101|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000101|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "51f680a8e64cc8f7", "measure_id": "201000101", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct and improve classrooms and support facilities, including improving student access to computers and technology, building a multipurpose facility for school and community use, and providing repairs and renewable energy improvements to reduce operating costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Blue Lake Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $2,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are used for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 528, "no_votes": 293, "total_votes": 821, "percent_yes": 64.311814, "percent_no": 35.688186, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.956827", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.122270", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct and improve classrooms and support facilities, including improving student access to computers and technology, building a multipurpose facility for school and community use, and providing repairs and renewable energy improvements to reduce operating costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Blue Lake Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $2,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are used for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6320, "fingerprint": "2010|201000103|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000103|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "f0de17e23ec4feeb", "measure_id": "201000103", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, modernize and renovate all schools in the District, improve energy efficiency including installing solar panels, replace deteriorating plumbing and drainage systems, upgrade inadequate electrical systems, improve technology, modernize restrooms, and make health and safety improvements, shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District issue $25,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1497, "no_votes": 833, "total_votes": 2330, "percent_yes": 64.248925, "percent_no": 35.751075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.957445", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.122654", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, modernize and renovate all schools in the District, improve energy efficiency including installing solar panels, replace deteriorating plumbing and drainage systems, upgrade inadequate electrical systems, improve technology, modernize restrooms, and make health and safety improvements, shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District issue $25,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6319, "fingerprint": "2010|201000102|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000102|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "292bed9ae6daab85", "measure_id": "201000102", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade and modernize classrooms and schools, make health and safety improvements; upgrade electrical systems, computers, and technology; repair leaky roofs; replace deteriorating plumbing and outdated windows; upgrade heating, ventilation, and cooling systems, and improve energy efficiency, shall the Rohnerville School District issue $5,000,000 of bonds within legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 934, "no_votes": 647, "total_votes": 1581, "percent_yes": 59.076536, "percent_no": 40.923464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.957151", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.122461", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade and modernize classrooms and schools, make health and safety improvements; upgrade electrical systems, computers, and technology; repair leaky roofs; replace deteriorating plumbing and outdated windows; upgrade heating, ventilation, and cooling systems, and improve energy efficiency, shall the Rohnerville School District issue $5,000,000 of bonds within legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6321, "fingerprint": "2010|201000221|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000221|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "e0ff1198db43f13c", "measure_id": "201000221", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ordinances be adopted amending the City of Eureka Local Coastal Program, including general plan and zoning amendments, to allow retail, office, multi-family residential, light industrial, restaurant, and museum uses on the \"Balloon Track\" and adjacent properties, as proposed for the 43-acre Marina Center Project; require additional permit approvals for the development; prohibit \"Discount Superstores\"; and authorize the City Council to amend or repeal specific limitations on development after 10 years and following appropriate environmental review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5942, "no_votes": 2695, "total_votes": 8637, "percent_yes": 68.797034, "percent_no": 31.202966000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.957737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.122848", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ordinances be adopted amending the City of Eureka Local Coastal Program, including general plan and zoning amendments, to allow retail, office, multi-family residential, light industrial, restaurant, and museum uses on the \"Balloon Track\" and adjacent properties, as proposed for the 43-acre Marina Center Project; require additional permit approvals for the development; prohibit \"Discount Superstores\"; and authorize the City Council to amend or repeal specific limitations on development after 10 years and following appropriate environmental review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6322, "fingerprint": "2010|201000222|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000222|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "1c352d7434e7db22", "measure_id": "201000222", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to add a one-half of a percent (0.50%) supplemental transaction and use tax to fund essential services such as police, fire, medical response, street maintenance, environmental programs, zoo, parks and recreation with the following restrictions? The supplemental transaction and use tax will expire after five years, unless reauthorized by the voters. A citizen's oversight committee shall be established to conduct annual audits of all expenditures generated by the tax to ensure fiscal accountability and public participation.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4686, "no_votes": 3884, "total_votes": 8570, "percent_yes": 54.679114, "percent_no": 45.320886, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.958029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.123039", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to add a one-half of a percent (0.50%) supplemental transaction and use tax to fund essential services such as police, fire, medical response, street maintenance, environmental programs, zoo, parks and recreation with the following restrictions? The supplemental transaction and use tax will expire after five years, unless reauthorized by the voters. A citizen's oversight committee shall be established to conduct annual audits of all expenditures generated by the tax to ensure fiscal accountability and public participation.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6323, "fingerprint": "2010|201000223|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000223|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "e671fb6591a52509", "measure_id": "201000223", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should minor cleanup amendments to various Sections of the Charter be performed to update language for consistency with State law and City regulations; remove outdated references to the Board of Education; remove expired citations, dates and obsolete code sections; update to reflect existing financial reporting systems; and remove obsolete bond revenue/indebtedness provisions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6473, "no_votes": 1437, "total_votes": 7910, "percent_yes": 81.833124, "percent_no": 18.166876000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.958390", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.123231", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should minor cleanup amendments to various Sections of the Charter be performed to update language for consistency with State law and City regulations; remove outdated references to the Board of Education; remove expired citations, dates and obsolete code sections; update to reflect existing financial reporting systems; and remove obsolete bond revenue/indebtedness provisions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6325, "fingerprint": "2010|201000409|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000409|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "458d06659c3699fa", "measure_id": "201000409", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Northern Humboldt Union High School District issue $25,800,000 of bonds within legal interest rates to provide finance for specific school facilities projects.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10386, "no_votes": 7079, "total_votes": 17465, "percent_yes": 59.467506, "percent_no": 40.532494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.959215", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.123691", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Northern Humboldt Union High School District issue $25,800,000 of bonds within legal interest rates to provide finance for specific school facilities projects.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6324, "fingerprint": "2010|201000224|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000224|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "2dbf700a89504397", "measure_id": "201000224", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without Increasing Local taxes, and in a manner consistent with Ferndale\u2019s General Plan and zoning ordinance, shall the City of Ferndale be authorized to acquire and rehabilitate the former Navy housing complex to provide housing affordable to low and moderate-income seniors, working families and individuals?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 516, "no_votes": 176, "total_votes": 692, "percent_yes": 74.56647, "percent_no": 25.433530000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.958836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.123432", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without Increasing Local taxes, and in a manner consistent with Ferndale\u2019s General Plan and zoning ordinance, shall the City of Ferndale be authorized to acquire and rehabilitate the former Navy housing complex to provide housing affordable to low and moderate-income seniors, working families and individuals?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6326, "fingerprint": "2010|201000055|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000055|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "ff034ae8a043f277", "measure_id": "201000055", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to prevent further cuts and preserve funding for general city services, including fire protection and crime prevention; street repair and maintenance; and avoiding closure of recreation programs, parks and libraries, by encating a half cent sales tax, a general tax, for twenty years be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2031, "no_votes": 1355, "total_votes": 3386, "percent_yes": 59.98228, "percent_no": 40.01772, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.959512", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.123894", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to prevent further cuts and preserve funding for general city services, including fire protection and crime prevention; street repair and maintenance; and avoiding closure of recreation programs, parks and libraries, by encating a half cent sales tax, a general tax, for twenty years be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6327, "fingerprint": "2010|201000104|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000104|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "f54a780df71af7d6", "measure_id": "201000104", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, modernize and improve classrooms and support facilities, including plumbing, electrical, and mechanical systems, classrooms and play areas, high school vocational classrooms and support facilities, solar utility improvements, to reduce annual costs and increase student access to modern technology, shall the Calipatria Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $25,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 317, "no_votes": 338, "total_votes": 655, "percent_yes": 48.396948, "percent_no": 51.603052, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.959807", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.124098", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, modernize and improve classrooms and support facilities, including plumbing, electrical, and mechanical systems, classrooms and play areas, high school vocational classrooms and support facilities, solar utility improvements, to reduce annual costs and increase student access to modern technology, shall the Calipatria Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $25,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6328, "fingerprint": "2010|201000410|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000410|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "4250706769afdccc", "measure_id": "201000410", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and expand career opportunities, shall the Imperial Community College District be authorized to acquire, construct and improve classrooms and facilites, including vocational, career, and technical facilities, modernize outdated calssrooms, and improve student access to computers and modern technology, by issuing $80,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual financial and performance audits, no money for salaries, and bonds only issued without increasing existing tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16325, "no_votes": 8895, "total_votes": 25220, "percent_yes": 64.73037000000001, "percent_no": 35.26962999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.960099", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.124289", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and expand career opportunities, shall the Imperial Community College District be authorized to acquire, construct and improve classrooms and facilites, including vocational, career, and technical facilities, modernize outdated calssrooms, and improve student access to computers and modern technology, by issuing $80,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual financial and performance audits, no money for salaries, and bonds only issued without increasing existing tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6329, "fingerprint": "2010|201000105|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000105|INYO", "content_hash": "9985d0b0f2565e32", "measure_id": "201000105", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities, including repairing, upgrading, and modernizing Big Pine schools, improving student access to computers and modern technology, upgrading athletic facilities and playgrounds, and making renewable energy improvements and improving efficiency to reduce costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Big Pine Unified School District be authorized to issue $4,100,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 360, "no_votes": 221, "total_votes": 581, "percent_yes": 61.962134, "percent_no": 38.037866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.960488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.124482", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities, including repairing, upgrading, and modernizing Big Pine schools, improving student access to computers and modern technology, upgrading athletic facilities and playgrounds, and making renewable energy improvements and improving efficiency to reduce costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Big Pine Unified School District be authorized to issue $4,100,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6330, "fingerprint": "2010|201000225|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000225|INYO", "content_hash": "2770434360ad74e5", "measure_id": "201000225", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should Ordinance No. 530 relating to keeping chickens and rabbits be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 615, "no_votes": 414, "total_votes": 1029, "percent_yes": 59.766763, "percent_no": 40.233237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.960780", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.124672", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Ordinance No. 530 relating to keeping chickens and rabbits be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6331, "fingerprint": "2010|201000008|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000008|KERN", "content_hash": "cc6cc7b05d38f6f9", "measure_id": "201000008", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Holly Hart be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2527, "no_votes": 2846, "total_votes": 5373, "percent_yes": 47.031453, "percent_no": 52.968547, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-03-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.961075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.124865", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Holly Hart be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6332, "fingerprint": "2010|201000009|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000009|KERN", "content_hash": "30e945f161adaa75", "measure_id": "201000009", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Patty Snyder be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2416, "no_votes": 2946, "total_votes": 5362, "percent_yes": 45.057815, "percent_no": 54.942185, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-03-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.961361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.125056", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Patty Snyder be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6333, "fingerprint": "2010|201000010|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000010|KERN", "content_hash": "2fd5a431ce799c0e", "measure_id": "201000010", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Mary Graham be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2444, "no_votes": 2918, "total_votes": 5362, "percent_yes": 45.58001, "percent_no": 54.41999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-03-09", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.961648", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.125248", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Mary Graham be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6334, "fingerprint": "2010|201000056|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000056|KERN", "content_hash": "348f336df37d432a", "measure_id": "201000056", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Ridgecrest revise its Municipal Code so as to eliminate the mandatory requirement of the citizens of Ridgecrest to contract for residential trash collection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4336, "no_votes": 1301, "total_votes": 5637, "percent_yes": 76.92035, "percent_no": 23.07965, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.961934", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.125437", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Ridgecrest revise its Municipal Code so as to eliminate the mandatory requirement of the citizens of Ridgecrest to contract for residential trash collection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6335, "fingerprint": "2010|201000057|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000057|KERN", "content_hash": "50612e942970a755", "measure_id": "201000057", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Rdigecrest revise its Municipal Code so as to eliminate the mandatory requirement of the citizens of Ridgecrest to contract for residential recycling services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4513, "no_votes": 1138, "total_votes": 5651, "percent_yes": 79.86197, "percent_no": 20.13803, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.962220", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.125627", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Rdigecrest revise its Municipal Code so as to eliminate the mandatory requirement of the citizens of Ridgecrest to contract for residential recycling services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6339, "fingerprint": "2010|201000411|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000411|KERN", "content_hash": "97e0364a80781490", "measure_id": "201000411", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve learning and safety in neighborhood schools and qualify for state matching funds, shall Fairfax School District rehabilitate/replace aging school safety, heating, ventilation, roofing, plumbing, electrical and building systems; upgrade classroom technology and school libraries; build a new school to relieve overcrowding; and renovate, acquire, construct and equip schools; by issuing $24.8 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, citizens' overisght, and no administrators' salaries and all funds benefiting Fiarfax schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1265, "no_votes": 443, "total_votes": 1708, "percent_yes": 74.06323, "percent_no": 25.936769999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.963500", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.126395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve learning and safety in neighborhood schools and qualify for state matching funds, shall Fairfax School District rehabilitate/replace aging school safety, heating, ventilation, roofing, plumbing, electrical and building systems; upgrade classroom technology and school libraries; build a new school to relieve overcrowding; and renovate, acquire, construct and equip schools; by issuing $24.8 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, citizens' overisght, and no administrators' salaries and all funds benefiting Fiarfax schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6337, "fingerprint": "2010|201000226|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000226|KERN", "content_hash": "f7d96c2276a5561c", "measure_id": "201000226", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Bakersfield adopt the following law: Effective January 1, 2011, new City of Bakersfield sworn public safety employees will pay 100% of their employee pension contribution and be eleigble for a maximum retirement allowance with the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) at a 2% at age 50 formula based on their average salary calculated over 36 highest paid consecutive months.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40305, "no_votes": 32693, "total_votes": 72998, "percent_yes": 55.213840000000005, "percent_no": 44.786159999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.962806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.126008", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Bakersfield adopt the following law: Effective January 1, 2011, new City of Bakersfield sworn public safety employees will pay 100% of their employee pension contribution and be eleigble for a maximum retirement allowance with the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) at a 2% at age 50 formula based on their average salary calculated over 36 highest paid consecutive months.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6338, "fingerprint": "2010|201000227|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000227|KERN", "content_hash": "70aa573f474aa673", "measure_id": "201000227", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a city-wide special tax of up to $120.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of ten (10) fiscal years beginning July 1, 2011, for water supply and distribution purposed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1312, "no_votes": 1498, "total_votes": 2810, "percent_yes": 46.690392, "percent_no": 53.309608, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.963203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.126200", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a city-wide special tax of up to $120.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of ten (10) fiscal years beginning July 1, 2011, for water supply and distribution purposed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6336, "fingerprint": "2010|201000150|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000150|KERN", "content_hash": "f42204f968ca44f9", "measure_id": "201000150", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain public safety, shall the Bear Valley Community Services District replace the existing non-lockable mailboxes with lockable mailboxes (cluster mail box units) by levying a one-time special tax of $140 on each parcel of land and providing a comprehensive audit to ensure proper use of the tax revenue. The tax will be levied through a one-time property tax on each privately owned parcel within the district.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1459, "no_votes": 1293, "total_votes": 2752, "percent_yes": 53.01599, "percent_no": 46.98401, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.962513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.125819", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain public safety, shall the Bear Valley Community Services District replace the existing non-lockable mailboxes with lockable mailboxes (cluster mail box units) by levying a one-time special tax of $140 on each parcel of land and providing a comprehensive audit to ensure proper use of the tax revenue. The tax will be levied through a one-time property tax on each privately owned parcel within the district.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6340, "fingerprint": "2010|201000106|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000106|KINGS", "content_hash": "85b1da0c88972d5e", "measure_id": "201000106", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of educaiton, modernize, upgrade and repair classrooms and school facilities in the District; improve energy efficiency; make health/safety improvements; construct new classrooms and restrooms; and renovate plumbing and sewer systems; shall Corcoran Joint Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, and equip school facilities by issuing $24,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teach salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 613, "no_votes": 570, "total_votes": 1183, "percent_yes": 51.81741, "percent_no": 48.18259, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.963790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.126592", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of educaiton, modernize, upgrade and repair classrooms and school facilities in the District; improve energy efficiency; make health/safety improvements; construct new classrooms and restrooms; and renovate plumbing and sewer systems; shall Corcoran Joint Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, and equip school facilities by issuing $24,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teach salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6341, "fingerprint": "2010|201000003|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000003|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "64ef13b2a764f421", "measure_id": "201000003", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall KATHY SALAZAR be recalled from the office of Member of the City Council of the City of Montebello?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2674, "no_votes": 1052, "total_votes": 3726, "percent_yes": 71.76597, "percent_no": 28.234030000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-02-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.964080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.126784", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall KATHY SALAZAR be recalled from the office of Member of the City Council of the City of Montebello?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6342, "fingerprint": "2010|201000004|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000004|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "77ad93a662012d04", "measure_id": "201000004", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ROBERT URTEAGA be recalled from the office of Member of the City Council of the City of Montebello?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2672, "no_votes": 1015, "total_votes": 3687, "percent_yes": 72.470844, "percent_no": 27.529156, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-02-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.964366", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.126973", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ROBERT URTEAGA be recalled from the office of Member of the City Council of the City of Montebello?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11483, "fingerprint": "2010|201000228|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000228|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0855c850e6f0fbe7", "measure_id": "201000228", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance to offset severe State cuts to the City of Bellflower by protecting and restoring essential City services including: sheriff patrols/substation hours of operation, school crossing guards, school safety/after-school programs, services for the disabled and drug/gang prevention; by temporarily increasing the City's utility users' tax by 2%, with a 5-year sunset, audits, low-income senior exemptions, citizens' oversight, and local control of funds be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6686, "no_votes": 6699, "total_votes": 13385, "percent_yes": 49.951437, "percent_no": 50.048563, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.144199", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.969646", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.130224", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance to offset severe State cuts to the City of Bellflower by protecting and restoring essential City services including: sheriff patrols/substation hours of operation, school crossing guards, school safety/after-school programs, services for the disabled and drug/gang prevention; by temporarily increasing the City's utility users' tax by 2%, with a 5-year sunset, audits, low-income senior exemptions, citizens' oversight, and local control of funds be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11481, "fingerprint": "2010|201000142|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000142|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6d5aa9afe84cb097", "measure_id": "201000142", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to require that candidates for the City Council must live in, and be registered to vote in, the City of Vernon for at least 30 days prior to running for office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 38, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-31", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.143637", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.968633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.129650", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to require that candidates for the City Council must live in, and be registered to vote in, the City of Vernon for at least 30 days prior to running for office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11480, "fingerprint": "2010|201000059|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000059|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bf30e5d38eeecb12", "measure_id": "201000059", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should section 510 of the Charter of the City of Torrance be amended to change the date of holding the general municipal election to the last Tuesday in April of each even numbered year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10345, "no_votes": 10451, "total_votes": 20796, "percent_yes": 49.745142, "percent_no": 50.254858, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.143074", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.967657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.129069", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should section 510 of the Charter of the City of Torrance be amended to change the date of holding the general municipal election to the last Tuesday in April of each even numbered year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6349, "fingerprint": "2010|201000029|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000029|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b39be96fcc200a63", "measure_id": "201000029", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect our high-quality local schools against severe funding cuts imposed by the State of California; prevent widespread teacher layoffs; maintain academic excellence in reading, writing, math, and science; preserve elementary school music; keep school libraries open; shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District levy a parcel tax of $198/year for five years, with senior homeowner exemptions; mandatory annual public audits; independent citizen oversight; no funds used for administrator salaries; and all funds supporting our local Santa Monica and Malibu schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13671, "no_votes": 7607, "total_votes": 21278, "percent_yes": 64.24946, "percent_no": 35.75054, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-25", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.966944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.128668", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect our high-quality local schools against severe funding cuts imposed by the State of California; prevent widespread teacher layoffs; maintain academic excellence in reading, writing, math, and science; preserve elementary school music; keep school libraries open; shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District levy a parcel tax of $198/year for five years, with senior homeowner exemptions; mandatory annual public audits; independent citizen oversight; no funds used for administrator salaries; and all funds supporting our local Santa Monica and Malibu schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11489, "fingerprint": "2010|201000418|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000418|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c877c3b2d21a5148", "measure_id": "201000418", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Wiseburn school facilities, and build a modern high school that accommodates all Wiseburn children, focuses on math, science and the arts, improves academic performance, safety, and security, and allows students to continue to achieve some of the highest test scores in the South Bay, shall the be authorized to issue up to $87 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with taxpayer safeguards, annual audits, and an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3285, "no_votes": 1053, "total_votes": 4338, "percent_yes": 75.72614, "percent_no": 24.27386, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.148504", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.976944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.134699", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Wiseburn school facilities, and build a modern high school that accommodates all Wiseburn children, focuses on math, science and the arts, improves academic performance, safety, and security, and allows students to continue to achieve some of the highest test scores in the South Bay, shall the be authorized to issue up to $87 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with taxpayer safeguards, annual audits, and an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6352, "fingerprint": "2010|201000108|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000108|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "554707b826b321af", "measure_id": "201000108", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety by upgrading school security systems and alarms; upgrade classrooms with up-to-date technology; acquire classrooms throughout the District; and provide more money for essential learning in the classrooms, shall the Lynwood Unified School District be authorized to issue $37.4 million of bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits and an independent citizens' oversight committee, with all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1312, "no_votes": 1276, "total_votes": 2588, "percent_yes": 50.69552, "percent_no": 49.30448, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.968340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.129457", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety by upgrading school security systems and alarms; upgrade classrooms with up-to-date technology; acquire classrooms throughout the District; and provide more money for essential learning in the classrooms, shall the Lynwood Unified School District be authorized to issue $37.4 million of bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits and an independent citizens' oversight committee, with all funds spent locally and no money used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11486, "fingerprint": "2010|201000233|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000233|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0e16fb1065de58e3", "measure_id": "201000233", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect public safety services such as 911 emergency response, police and fire, as well as essential quality of life programs like parks, libraries, public works and infrastructure, should the City of Long Beach impose a 15% tax on recreational marijuana businesses if legalized, with a $25 tax on cultivation sites per square foot, with an annual CPI adjustment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 74781, "no_votes": 27965, "total_votes": 102746, "percent_yes": 72.7824, "percent_no": 27.217600000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.145142", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.971152", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.131184", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect public safety services such as 911 emergency response, police and fire, as well as essential quality of life programs like parks, libraries, public works and infrastructure, should the City of Long Beach impose a 15% tax on recreational marijuana businesses if legalized, with a $25 tax on cultivation sites per square foot, with an annual CPI adjustment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6353, "fingerprint": "2010|201000143|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000143|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b57689d2efd9414f", "measure_id": "201000143", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to allow the proceeds of the existing special parcel tax on warehouses and similar uses to be spent on police and fire protection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33, "no_votes": 5, "total_votes": 38, "percent_yes": 86.842105, "percent_no": 13.157894999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-31", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.968942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.129840", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to allow the proceeds of the existing special parcel tax on warehouses and similar uses to be spent on police and fire protection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11487, "fingerprint": "2010|201000234|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000234|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a5c75b013d1d849f", "measure_id": "201000234", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition C, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by increasing the credits given to disabled veterans in the hiring process, be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65388, "no_votes": 30397, "total_votes": 95785, "percent_yes": 68.265384, "percent_no": 31.734616000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.145330", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.971444", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.131378", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition C, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by increasing the credits given to disabled veterans in the hiring process, be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11482, "fingerprint": "2010|201000144|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000144|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6d8e59d0db4406ba", "measure_id": "201000144", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to restrict the use of certain Light and Power revenues to supporting the Light and Power enterprise?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 38, "percent_yes": 84.210526, "percent_no": 15.789473999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-31", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.144013", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.969233", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.130032", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Vernon City Charter be amended to restrict the use of certain Light and Power revenues to supporting the Light and Power enterprise?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6345, "fingerprint": "2010|201000013|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000013|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "60cd5f9d363e2ed9", "measure_id": "201000013", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the City of Lancaster adopt a charter to regain home-rule control and accountability from the State for local municipal affairs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8996, "no_votes": 3674, "total_votes": 12670, "percent_yes": 71.00237, "percent_no": 28.99763, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-04-13", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.965311", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.127556", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the City of Lancaster adopt a charter to regain home-rule control and accountability from the State for local municipal affairs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6348, "fingerprint": "2010|201000019|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000019|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c4e86e06732e7f06", "measure_id": "201000019", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide educational opportunities so local students are prepared to succeed in college and careers; to retain quality teachers; continue funding academic programs in advanced math, science, technology, music and art; keep school libraries open, and lessen the impact of state budget cuts, shall Pasadena Unified School District levy a tax of $120 per parcel annually for five years, with independent citizens' oversight, exemption for low-income seniors, and with all funds benefiting our local public schools and students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16845, "no_votes": 14495, "total_votes": 31340, "percent_yes": 53.74920399999999, "percent_no": 46.25079600000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.966628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.128459", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide educational opportunities so local students are prepared to succeed in college and careers; to retain quality teachers; continue funding academic programs in advanced math, science, technology, music and art; keep school libraries open, and lessen the impact of state budget cuts, shall Pasadena Unified School District levy a tax of $120 per parcel annually for five years, with independent citizens' oversight, exemption for low-income seniors, and with all funds benefiting our local public schools and students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6367, "fingerprint": "2010|201000413|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000413|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "909bbaf6b18ab4ee", "measure_id": "201000413", "measure_letter": "CL", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support and repair Claremont schools, make funding available for qualified teachers and academic programs threatened by the State cuts, provide safe/modern classrooms, qualify for State matching funds, construct, acquire, repair equip classrooms/school facilities/sites, improve fire/student safety, upgrade instructional technology, labs/librairies, roofs, plumbing, wiring, shall Claremont Unified School District issue $95,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight and all funds supporting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6198, "no_votes": 9156, "total_votes": 15354, "percent_yes": 40.367332, "percent_no": 59.632668, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.975288", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.133732", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support and repair Claremont schools, make funding available for qualified teachers and academic programs threatened by the State cuts, provide safe/modern classrooms, qualify for State matching funds, construct, acquire, repair equip classrooms/school facilities/sites, improve fire/student safety, upgrade instructional technology, labs/librairies, roofs, plumbing, wiring, shall Claremont Unified School District issue $95,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight and all funds supporting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6350, "fingerprint": "2010|201000058|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000058|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "15d980ee768315c1", "measure_id": "201000058", "measure_letter": "CS", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 2 of Ordinance No. 657, of the City of Inglewood be amended to withdraw the positions of Senior Administrative Analyst to the Mayor, Executive Assistant to the Mayor and Assistant to City Council from the Civil Service System, thereby making the positions unclassified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3114, "no_votes": 3250, "total_votes": 6364, "percent_yes": 48.931488, "percent_no": 51.068512, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.967337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.128868", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 2 of Ordinance No. 657, of the City of Inglewood be amended to withdraw the positions of Senior Administrative Analyst to the Mayor, Executive Assistant to the Mayor and Assistant to City Council from the Civil Service System, thereby making the positions unclassified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6366, "fingerprint": "2010|201000412|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000412|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "eb9ba34cc0571c58", "measure_id": "201000412", "measure_letter": "CV", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect students from earthquakes; remove asbestos, lead paint, and other safety hazards from schools; and improve learning and academic achievement, shall the Centinela Valley Union High School District issue $98,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, to repair, acquire, and construct local schools, sites, and facilities, including libraries, classrooms, science labs, and academic academies; and replace aging plumbing, heating, electrical, and school security systems; with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16057, "no_votes": 8697, "total_votes": 24754, "percent_yes": 64.866287, "percent_no": 35.133713, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.975000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.133536", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect students from earthquakes; remove asbestos, lead paint, and other safety hazards from schools; and improve learning and academic achievement, shall the Centinela Valley Union High School District issue $98,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, to repair, acquire, and construct local schools, sites, and facilities, including libraries, classrooms, science labs, and academic academies; and replace aging plumbing, heating, electrical, and school security systems; with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6356, "fingerprint": "2010|201000235|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000235|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f19706e5d334592f", "measure_id": "201000235", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition D, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by changing the formula from 10% of net income to 5% of gross operating revenues in order to clarify the formula for the transfer of funds from Harbor Department revenues to the Tidelands Operating Fund, and clarifying that the management of the City's oil properties and subsidence control operations are under the exclusive control of the City Council, be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49993, "no_votes": 39947, "total_votes": 89940, "percent_yes": 55.584836, "percent_no": 44.415164, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.971807", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.131598", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition D, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by changing the formula from 10% of net income to 5% of gross operating revenues in order to clarify the formula for the transfer of funds from Harbor Department revenues to the Tidelands Operating Fund, and clarifying that the management of the City's oil properties and subsidence control operations are under the exclusive control of the City Council, be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11488, "fingerprint": "2010|201000414|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000414|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "932514d1f42fb117", "measure_id": "201000414", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve learning in neighborhood schools and attract/ retain quality teachers by upgrading classroom technology, improving facilities that prepare Duarte students for college/ high demand jobs, repairing aging roofs, plumbing, restrooms and electrical systems, improving school security/ safety systems, renovating, acquiring, contructing/ equipping classrooms, sites, facilities and schools, shall Duarte Unified School District issue $62 million of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, mandatory annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4198, "no_votes": 2810, "total_votes": 7008, "percent_yes": 59.902966, "percent_no": 40.097034, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.147756", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.975583", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.133926", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve learning in neighborhood schools and attract/ retain quality teachers by upgrading classroom technology, improving facilities that prepare Duarte students for college/ high demand jobs, repairing aging roofs, plumbing, restrooms and electrical systems, improving school security/ safety systems, renovating, acquiring, contructing/ equipping classrooms, sites, facilities and schools, shall Duarte Unified School District issue $62 million of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, mandatory annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6351, "fingerprint": "2010|201000107|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000107|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "eb16222167853e1d", "measure_id": "201000107", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts; promote student achievement in reading/mathematics/science/arts; maintain vocational education/job training programs; limit class size increases; reduce teacher/staff layoffs; keep schools safe/bathrooms clean; shall the Los Angeles Unified School District levy a temporary $100 annual education parcel tax ending after four years, exempting low-income seniors, no money for central district administrators' salaries, mandatory audits, with all funds going to neighborhood schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 198586, "no_votes": 176459, "total_votes": 375045, "percent_yes": 52.94991, "percent_no": 47.05009, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.968003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.129262", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts; promote student achievement in reading/mathematics/science/arts; maintain vocational education/job training programs; limit class size increases; reduce teacher/staff layoffs; keep schools safe/bathrooms clean; shall the Los Angeles Unified School District levy a temporary $100 annual education parcel tax ending after four years, exempting low-income seniors, no money for central district administrators' salaries, mandatory audits, with all funds going to neighborhood schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6347, "fingerprint": "2010|201000016|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000016|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e9782a8d61bbd7e5", "measure_id": "201000016", "measure_letter": "ED", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted prohibiting the City of Sierra Madre from exercising the power of eminent domain for private purposes, or facilitating or funding the exercise of the power of eminent domain for private purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2359, "no_votes": 387, "total_votes": 2746, "percent_yes": 85.906774, "percent_no": 14.093226000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-04-13", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.966247", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.128266", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted prohibiting the City of Sierra Madre from exercising the power of eminent domain for private purposes, or facilitating or funding the exercise of the power of eminent domain for private purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6368, "fingerprint": "2010|201000415|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000415|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bed329e2ae275236", "measure_id": "201000415", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct and improve local schools and student support facilities, improve student access to computers and classroom technology, build vocational technical classrooms, provide improvements to better maintain our schools, and provide renewable energy improvements to reduce operating costs and put more money into the classroom, shall El Rancho Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $52,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no increase to current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9549, "no_votes": 3354, "total_votes": 12903, "percent_yes": 74.006045, "percent_no": 25.993955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.975992", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.134119", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct and improve local schools and student support facilities, improve student access to computers and classroom technology, build vocational technical classrooms, provide improvements to better maintain our schools, and provide renewable energy improvements to reduce operating costs and put more money into the classroom, shall El Rancho Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $52,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no increase to current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6360, "fingerprint": "2010|201000239|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000239|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d9fece908781cd40", "measure_id": "201000239", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Coastal Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance for the Coastal Zone (\"Coastal Zoning Ordinance\") for the AES Power Plant site, the Catalina Avenue corridor and the Harbor/Pier areas of the City of Redondo Beach be amended to provide for major changes in existing policies and development standards including changes in permitted uses, adoption of height limitations, floor-area-ratio (FAR) limitations and other development policies and standards?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12622, "no_votes": 11422, "total_votes": 24044, "percent_yes": 52.495426, "percent_no": 47.504574, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.973139", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.132370", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Coastal Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance for the Coastal Zone (\"Coastal Zoning Ordinance\") for the AES Power Plant site, the Catalina Avenue corridor and the Harbor/Pier areas of the City of Redondo Beach be amended to provide for major changes in existing policies and development standards including changes in permitted uses, adoption of height limitations, floor-area-ratio (FAR) limitations and other development policies and standards?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6357, "fingerprint": "2010|201000236|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000236|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "793ac6f7b020d229", "measure_id": "201000236", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition GG which amends the Long Beach City Charter by transferring certain powers from the Civil Service Commision to the City Manager, including examination and certification for employment, classification creation, maintenance of eligibility lists, and the appointment management of a professional staff, be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42975, "no_votes": 49044, "total_votes": 92019, "percent_yes": 46.70231, "percent_no": 53.29769, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.972200", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.131791", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition GG which amends the Long Beach City Charter by transferring certain powers from the Civil Service Commision to the City Manager, including examination and certification for employment, classification creation, maintenance of eligibility lists, and the appointment management of a professional staff, be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6354, "fingerprint": "2010|201000229|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000229|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "08fb1a0d7141c43f", "measure_id": "201000229", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts; maintain Sheriffs deputies patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response; pothole/street repairs; gang prevention; youth recreation and after school programs; parks; natural disaster response; seniors' services including meals on wheels and other general fund services; shall the City of Carson sales tax be increased one cent, legally required to end after five years with annual audits, and state government cannot take these funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9890, "no_votes": 13889, "total_votes": 23779, "percent_yes": 41.59132, "percent_no": 58.40868, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.969959", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.130419", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts; maintain Sheriffs deputies patrols; 9-1-1 emergency response; pothole/street repairs; gang prevention; youth recreation and after school programs; parks; natural disaster response; seniors' services including meals on wheels and other general fund services; shall the City of Carson sales tax be increased one cent, legally required to end after five years with annual audits, and state government cannot take these funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6346, "fingerprint": "2010|201000014|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000014|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0baeb74a2a867040", "measure_id": "201000014", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In response to a recent complaint, with respect to the invocations that contained reference to Jesus Christ, shall the City Council continue its invocation policy in randomly selecting local clergy of different faiths to deliver the invocation without restricting the content based on their beliefs, including references to Jesus Christ?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9765, "no_votes": 3116, "total_votes": 12881, "percent_yes": 75.80933, "percent_no": 24.190669999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-04-13", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.965601", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.127878", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In response to a recent complaint, with respect to the invocations that contained reference to Jesus Christ, shall the City Council continue its invocation policy in randomly selecting local clergy of different faiths to deliver the invocation without restricting the content based on their beliefs, including references to Jesus Christ?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6369, "fingerprint": "2010|201000416|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000416|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c6970342726ff642", "measure_id": "201000416", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education, make schools safe, complete essential health/safety repairs, fix roofs, shall Lynwood Unified School District upgrade plumbing, electrical, sewer/heating/cooling systems, aging schools, science labs, install energy efficient lighting/windows, improve school safety, remove hazardous materials; repair, acquire, construct, equip schools/facilities/sites, upgrade fire safety, by issuing $45,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4821, "no_votes": 4142, "total_votes": 8963, "percent_yes": 53.78779, "percent_no": 46.21221, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.976337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.134312", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education, make schools safe, complete essential health/safety repairs, fix roofs, shall Lynwood Unified School District upgrade plumbing, electrical, sewer/heating/cooling systems, aging schools, science labs, install energy efficient lighting/windows, improve school safety, remove hazardous materials; repair, acquire, construct, equip schools/facilities/sites, upgrade fire safety, by issuing $45,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11484, "fingerprint": "2010|201000231|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000231|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d3bbc5da3cd38150", "measure_id": "201000231", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require a Cannabis Business to pay an annual business license tax in the amount of 10% per $1,000 of gross receipts to provide for general municipal services, such as law enforcement and fire services, animal control, code enforcement, building inspection, plan checks, planning and public works?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4017, "no_votes": 1891, "total_votes": 5908, "percent_yes": 67.99255, "percent_no": 32.007450000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.144768", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.970559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.130804", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require a Cannabis Business to pay an annual business license tax in the amount of 10% per $1,000 of gross receipts to provide for general municipal services, such as law enforcement and fire services, animal control, code enforcement, building inspection, plan checks, planning and public works?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11479, "fingerprint": "2010|201000015|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000015|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e22b3ce1bb7d1b35", "measure_id": "201000015", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of the Mayor be four years, commencing in 2012?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7168, "no_votes": 5768, "total_votes": 12936, "percent_yes": 55.411255, "percent_no": 44.588745, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-04-13", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.142138", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.965891", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.128077", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of the Mayor be four years, commencing in 2012?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6343, "fingerprint": "2010|201000011|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000011|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c9d46e76437c8cfe", "measure_id": "201000011", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 3-7 that imposes a Utility User Tax on non-residential users in the City by updating and replacing the telephone tax regulations with modern communication services tax regulations be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1570, "no_votes": 647, "total_votes": 2217, "percent_yes": 70.81642000000001, "percent_no": 29.183579999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-04-13", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.964653", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.127167", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 3-7 that imposes a Utility User Tax on non-residential users in the City by updating and replacing the telephone tax regulations with modern communication services tax regulations be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11485, "fingerprint": "2010|201000232|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000232|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "87b341c1a77d1990", "measure_id": "201000232", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require Medical Marijuana Cooperatives operating in La Puente to pay an annual business license tax of 10% per $1,000 of gross receipts, or $100 per square footage on premises, if such Medical Marijuana Cooperative is exempted under California Constitution from local taxes measured by gross receipts to provide for general municipal services, including but not limited to law enforcement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4141, "no_votes": 1920, "total_votes": 6061, "percent_yes": 68.322057, "percent_no": 31.677943, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.144957", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.970861", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.130994", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require Medical Marijuana Cooperatives operating in La Puente to pay an annual business license tax of 10% per $1,000 of gross receipts, or $100 per square footage on premises, if such Medical Marijuana Cooperative is exempted under California Constitution from local taxes measured by gross receipts to provide for general municipal services, including but not limited to law enforcement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6344, "fingerprint": "2010|201000012|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000012|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "27f6da56723cba73", "measure_id": "201000012", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending El Segundo Municipal Code \u00a7\u00a7 4-2-1, 4-2-3, and 4-2-4 to allow annual increases to the business license tax to fund general municipal services including, without limitation, police protection and crime suppression services, fire prevention and suppression services, and park and recreation facilities and services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1508, "no_votes": 711, "total_votes": 2219, "percent_yes": 67.95854, "percent_no": 32.04146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-04-13", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.965022", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.127356", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending El Segundo Municipal Code \u00a7\u00a7 4-2-1, 4-2-3, and 4-2-4 to allow annual increases to the business license tax to fund general municipal services including, without limitation, police protection and crime suppression services, fire prevention and suppression services, and park and recreation facilities and services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6355, "fingerprint": "2010|201000230|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000230|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a4dc2829c6f00c1e", "measure_id": "201000230", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 3-7 to temporarily increase the Utility User Taxes by 1% to fund general municipal services including, without limitation, police protection and crime suppression services, fire prevention and suppression services, and park and recreation facilities and services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2890, "no_votes": 3518, "total_votes": 6408, "percent_yes": 45.099875, "percent_no": 54.900125, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.970251", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.130614", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending El Segundo Municipal Code Chapter 3-7 to temporarily increase the Utility User Taxes by 1% to fund general municipal services including, without limitation, police protection and crime suppression services, fire prevention and suppression services, and park and recreation facilities and services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6359, "fingerprint": "2010|201000238|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000238|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "72ec838caeda3877", "measure_id": "201000238", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would enact a new specific plan and related amendments to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes (\"City\") general plan and zoning ordinance to: (1) allow development of specified facility improvements, including dormitories, on the Marymount College Campus (\"Campus\") located at 30800 Palos Verdes Drive East; (2) govern the operation of the Campus, and (3) supersede inconsistent provisions of the Municipal Code and prior City land use decisions regarding the Campus?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8117, "no_votes": 9686, "total_votes": 17803, "percent_yes": 45.59344, "percent_no": 54.40656, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.972793", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.132179", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would enact a new specific plan and related amendments to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes (\"City\") general plan and zoning ordinance to: (1) allow development of specified facility improvements, including dormitories, on the Marymount College Campus (\"Campus\") located at 30800 Palos Verdes Drive East; (2) govern the operation of the Campus, and (3) supersede inconsistent provisions of the Municipal Code and prior City land use decisions regarding the Campus?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6365, "fingerprint": "2010|201000244|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000244|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "485f9073fdec8c41", "measure_id": "201000244", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts and prevent drastic cuts to sheriffs' deputies patrols, pothole and street repairs, youth gang and drug prevention, after school programs, senior services, storm drain maintenance, graffiti removal, parks, recreation and general City services, shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a one-half cent transaction and use tax in the City of South El Monte, subject to annual independent audits, public expenditure reports and local use of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1573, "no_votes": 979, "total_votes": 2552, "percent_yes": 61.63793, "percent_no": 38.36207, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.974710", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.133341", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts and prevent drastic cuts to sheriffs' deputies patrols, pothole and street repairs, youth gang and drug prevention, after school programs, senior services, storm drain maintenance, graffiti removal, parks, recreation and general City services, shall an ordinance be adopted to enact a one-half cent transaction and use tax in the City of South El Monte, subject to annual independent audits, public expenditure reports and local use of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6362, "fingerprint": "2010|201000241|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000241|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9ead748a3562ec8d", "measure_id": "201000241", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to protect all tenants and preserve community stability and diversity by adding requirements that a landlord show good cause to evict any tenant and serve a warning notice giving reasonable time to correct a rental agreement violation, except nonpayment of rent, and adding a prohibition against evicting long-term elderly, disabled or terminally ill tenants for owner occupancy unless the proposed owner-occupant is also elderly, disabled or terminally ill?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19897, "no_votes": 10544, "total_votes": 30441, "percent_yes": 65.36251, "percent_no": 34.63749, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.973758", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.132755", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to protect all tenants and preserve community stability and diversity by adding requirements that a landlord show good cause to evict any tenant and serve a warning notice giving reasonable time to correct a rental agreement violation, except nonpayment of rent, and adding a prohibition against evicting long-term elderly, disabled or terminally ill tenants for owner occupancy unless the proposed owner-occupant is also elderly, disabled or terminally ill?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6361, "fingerprint": "2010|201000240|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000240|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0be08798be8773d4", "measure_id": "201000240", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain funding for City services including police officers, firefighters, paramedics, senior programs, youth/gang, drug, and crime prevention programs, street repairs, parks, ball fields, afterschool library programs, community centers and other City services, shall an ordinance be adopted to establish a 5% utility users tax, exempting low income seniors/residents, with annual audits, no tax increase without voter approval and no funds for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2462, "no_votes": 1594, "total_votes": 4056, "percent_yes": 60.700196, "percent_no": 39.299804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.973468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.132565", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain funding for City services including police officers, firefighters, paramedics, senior programs, youth/gang, drug, and crime prevention programs, street repairs, parks, ball fields, afterschool library programs, community centers and other City services, shall an ordinance be adopted to establish a 5% utility users tax, exempting low income seniors/residents, with annual audits, no tax increase without voter approval and no funds for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6358, "fingerprint": "2010|201000237|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000237|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6bba7f539c9876e0", "measure_id": "201000237", "measure_letter": "SP", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase Pomona's Utility Users' Tax by (2%) for an initial period of 26 months, to fund general city services, including police, fire, street repair, parks, recreation and library programs; suspend the increase following the 26 month period, unless the Pomona City Council overrides the suspension by a 6/7ths vote; and provide a UUT payment exemption for the legally disabled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5910, "no_votes": 16060, "total_votes": 21970, "percent_yes": 26.900318, "percent_no": 73.099682, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.972500", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.131986", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase Pomona's Utility Users' Tax by (2%) for an initial period of 26 months, to fund general city services, including police, fire, street repair, parks, recreation and library programs; suspend the increase following the 26 month period, unless the Pomona City Council overrides the suspension by a 6/7ths vote; and provide a UUT payment exemption for the legally disabled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6370, "fingerprint": "2010|201000417|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000417|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "333b4809d49e23cf", "measure_id": "201000417", "measure_letter": "SS", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve academic programs including math, science, reading, history and writing; computer technology, music and arts; and retain highly qualified teachers; shall Pomona Unified School District be authorized to raise $4 million per year through a $96 parcel tax for four years (per voter pamphlet), provided there is an annual accounting of funds, senior exemptions, and all funds are spent on neighborhood schools and cannot be taken by the state and used elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15004, "no_votes": 12462, "total_votes": 27466, "percent_yes": 54.62754, "percent_no": 45.37246, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.976651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.134508", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve academic programs including math, science, reading, history and writing; computer technology, music and arts; and retain highly qualified teachers; shall Pomona Unified School District be authorized to raise $4 million per year through a $96 parcel tax for four years (per voter pamphlet), provided there is an annual accounting of funds, senior exemptions, and all funds are spent on neighborhood schools and cannot be taken by the state and used elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6363, "fingerprint": "2010|201000242|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000242|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "054531925322f8df", "measure_id": "201000242", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "\u00a0Shall an ordinance be adopted to offset severe state budget cuts, protect and stabilize City finances, and maintain essential services including: police, fire, paramedic and emergency 911 response, school, educational and afterschool programs, public transit, services for the disabled, gang and drug prevention programs, enviromental, library and other general fund services, by enacting a City of Santa Monica \u00bd percent transactions and use tax, subject to independent annual audits, and no money going to Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20046, "no_votes": 12698, "total_votes": 32744, "percent_yes": 61.22038, "percent_no": 38.77962, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.974094", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.132945", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "\u00a0Shall an ordinance be adopted to offset severe state budget cuts, protect and stabilize City finances, and maintain essential services including: police, fire, paramedic and emergency 911 response, school, educational and afterschool programs, public transit, services for the disabled, gang and drug prevention programs, enviromental, library and other general fund services, by enacting a City of Santa Monica \u00bd percent transactions and use tax, subject to independent annual audits, and no money going to Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6364, "fingerprint": "2010|201000243|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000243|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "51f7ea76e2f3a81c", "measure_id": "201000243", "measure_letter": "YY", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If a local transactions and use tax is enacted in the City of Santa Monica, should half of its revenue be used to support school, educational and afterschool programs, with half of its revenue being used for general City services such as: police, fire, paramedic and emegency 911 response, public transit, services for the disabled, gang and drug prevention programs, enviromental, library and other general fund services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22077, "no_votes": 10266, "total_votes": 32343, "percent_yes": 68.258977, "percent_no": 31.741023, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.974421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.133149", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If a local transactions and use tax is enacted in the City of Santa Monica, should half of its revenue be used to support school, educational and afterschool programs, with half of its revenue being used for general City services such as: police, fire, paramedic and emegency 911 response, public transit, services for the disabled, gang and drug prevention programs, enviromental, library and other general fund services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6371, "fingerprint": "2010|201000245|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000245|MADERA", "content_hash": "bb7a346eb06925f0", "measure_id": "201000245", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Madera be elected by districts described in Ordinance No. 871 C.S., and the Mayor of the City of Madera be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6299, "no_votes": 1699, "total_votes": 7998, "percent_yes": 78.75719, "percent_no": 21.242810000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.977246", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.134892", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Madera be elected by districts described in Ordinance No. 871 C.S., and the Mayor of the City of Madera be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11492, "fingerprint": "2010|201000419|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000419|MARIN", "content_hash": "8eef790558864937", "measure_id": "201000419", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Local quality education school measure. To maintain quality local public education, relieve overcrowding, maintain low class size ratios, restore art, music, multipurpose rooms, build science labs, upgrade computer/classroom technology and energy efficiency, shall Ross Valley School District replace portables with permanent classrooms, qualify for matching grants, acquire, repair, construct, equipment, sites and facilities, by issuing $41,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with independent audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8565, "no_votes": 3490, "total_votes": 12055, "percent_yes": 71.049356, "percent_no": 28.950643999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.152162", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.982959", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.138359", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Local quality education school measure. To maintain quality local public education, relieve overcrowding, maintain low class size ratios, restore art, music, multipurpose rooms, build science labs, upgrade computer/classroom technology and energy efficiency, shall Ross Valley School District replace portables with permanent classrooms, qualify for matching grants, acquire, repair, construct, equipment, sites and facilities, by issuing $41,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with independent audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6372, "fingerprint": "2010|201000032|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000032|MARIN", "content_hash": "2b55b97b1be17ea3", "measure_id": "201000032", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide critical funding to: bring local libraries up to date, prevent closures, and maintain library hours; provide children, teen, senior and disabled programs including adult and family literacy; maintain collections of books, CDs DVDs. Materials and services; provide ADA accessibility; and ensure local funding that can't be taken by the State, shall Marin County Free Library be authorized to levy $49 per parcel annually for 5 years, including independent citizen oversight and senior citizen exemptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30782, "no_votes": 10340, "total_votes": 41122, "percent_yes": 74.85531, "percent_no": 25.144689999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.977543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.135081", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide critical funding to: bring local libraries up to date, prevent closures, and maintain library hours; provide children, teen, senior and disabled programs including adult and family literacy; maintain collections of books, CDs DVDs. Materials and services; provide ADA accessibility; and ensure local funding that can't be taken by the State, shall Marin County Free Library be authorized to levy $49 per parcel annually for 5 years, including independent citizen oversight and senior citizen exemptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6374, "fingerprint": "2010|201000060|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000060|MARIN", "content_hash": "302ff5c9017cf815", "measure_id": "201000060", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to increase San Anselmo Library open hours, improve children's services at the Library including hiring a special children's librarian, and enhance general Library services, shall an ordinance be adopted approving a Special Library Services Tax of $49.00 per year per real estate parcel located in the Town of San Anselmo, for a period of five (5) years, to be used to augment the money from the Town of San Anselmo's General Fund currently used to fund library services in San Anselmo?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3201, "no_votes": 1018, "total_votes": 4219, "percent_yes": 75.87106, "percent_no": 24.12894, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.978213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.135467", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to increase San Anselmo Library open hours, improve children's services at the Library including hiring a special children's librarian, and enhance general Library services, shall an ordinance be adopted approving a Special Library Services Tax of $49.00 per year per real estate parcel located in the Town of San Anselmo, for a period of five (5) years, to be used to augment the money from the Town of San Anselmo's General Fund currently used to fund library services in San Anselmo?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11490, "fingerprint": "2010|201000246|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000246|MARIN", "content_hash": "5ce11341fad99f14", "measure_id": "201000246", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Town of Corte Madera voters adopt an ordinance continuing a special tax for four more years for paramedic and/or emergency medical services at a rate of $60.00 per residence and $60.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal year 2011-2012, increasing $5.00 yearly to $75.00 per residence and $75.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses in 2014-2015, and increasing the appropriations limit by the tax proceeds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2689, "no_votes": 1458, "total_votes": 4147, "percent_yes": 64.84206, "percent_no": 35.157939999999996, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.150754", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.980739", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.137022", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Town of Corte Madera voters adopt an ordinance continuing a special tax for four more years for paramedic and/or emergency medical services at a rate of $60.00 per residence and $60.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal year 2011-2012, increasing $5.00 yearly to $75.00 per residence and $75.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses in 2014-2015, and increasing the appropriations limit by the tax proceeds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6375, "fingerprint": "2010|201000061|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000061|MARIN", "content_hash": "718b814236cf1547", "measure_id": "201000061", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide a consistent, locally-controlled funding source, augmenting current general fund allocations for the San Rafael Public Library, for expanded hours, improved facilities, equipment, materials, and services for children, teens, and adults, shall the City of San Rafael be authorized to levy an annual $49 parcel tax (slightly higher rates for multiple-unit residential parcels) for a period of seven years, with oversight by an independent citizens committee and with exemptions for senior citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10115, "no_votes": 4280, "total_votes": 14395, "percent_yes": 70.267457, "percent_no": 29.732543000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.978501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.135662", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a consistent, locally-controlled funding source, augmenting current general fund allocations for the San Rafael Public Library, for expanded hours, improved facilities, equipment, materials, and services for children, teens, and adults, shall the City of San Rafael be authorized to levy an annual $49 parcel tax (slightly higher rates for multiple-unit residential parcels) for a period of seven years, with oversight by an independent citizens committee and with exemptions for senior citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6382, "fingerprint": "2010|201000247|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000247|MARIN", "content_hash": "def66c4bdce095ec", "measure_id": "201000247", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a continuation of the special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $42.50 not exceeding $51.50 in the fourth year per taxable living unit or per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in nonresidential use, to be collected in addition to trasport fees charged to insurance providers for Ross Valley residents, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2855, "no_votes": 977, "total_votes": 3832, "percent_yes": 74.50417, "percent_no": 25.495829999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.981032", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.137214", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a continuation of the special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $42.50 not exceeding $51.50 in the fourth year per taxable living unit or per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in nonresidential use, to be collected in addition to trasport fees charged to insurance providers for Ross Valley residents, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11491, "fingerprint": "2010|201000248|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000248|MARIN", "content_hash": "4aa5a5bb49ed7e7d", "measure_id": "201000248", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a continuation of the special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $42.50 not exceeding $51.50 in the fourth year per taxable living unit or per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in non-residential use, to be collected in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers for Ross Valley residents, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3855, "no_votes": 1646, "total_votes": 5501, "percent_yes": 70.07817, "percent_no": 29.92183, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.151129", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.981319", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.137404", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a continuation of the special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $42.50 not exceeding $51.50 in the fourth year per taxable living unit or per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in non-residential use, to be collected in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers for Ross Valley residents, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6373, "fingerprint": "2010|201000033|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000033|MARIN", "content_hash": "8b3e0045359d729a", "measure_id": "201000033", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Muir Beach CSD Ordinance No. 2010-1, which imposes an annual special tax of $3,250.00 on each improved commercially zoned parcel, $300.00 per separate habitable structure on each residentially zoned parcel and $300.00 on all other parcels for a period of four (4) years, commencing FY 2010-2011 and teminating in FY 2014-2015, be approved and shall the Muir Beach CSD appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter approved tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 129, "no_votes": 22, "total_votes": 151, "percent_yes": 85.43046, "percent_no": 14.569540000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.977887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.135273", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Muir Beach CSD Ordinance No. 2010-1, which imposes an annual special tax of $3,250.00 on each improved commercially zoned parcel, $300.00 per separate habitable structure on each residentially zoned parcel and $300.00 on all other parcels for a period of four (4) years, commencing FY 2010-2011 and teminating in FY 2014-2015, be approved and shall the Muir Beach CSD appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter approved tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6383, "fingerprint": "2010|201000249|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000249|MARIN", "content_hash": "b0824d6f4a798fd8", "measure_id": "201000249", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset/prevent additional budget cuts and maintain/restore vital general city services including, and not limited to: neighborhood police patrols, crime prevention programs, 9-1-1 response times; city street/pothole repair; park maintenance; preventing closure or elimination of youth and senior centers/services, shall the City of Novato enact a half-cent sales tax for 5 years, with review by a citizen committee, annual independent audits, and all funds spent locally for the benefit of Novato citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11147, "no_votes": 8018, "total_votes": 19165, "percent_yes": 58.16332, "percent_no": 41.83668, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.981692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.137596", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset/prevent additional budget cuts and maintain/restore vital general city services including, and not limited to: neighborhood police patrols, crime prevention programs, 9-1-1 response times; city street/pothole repair; park maintenance; preventing closure or elimination of youth and senior centers/services, shall the City of Novato enact a half-cent sales tax for 5 years, with review by a citizen committee, annual independent audits, and all funds spent locally for the benefit of Novato citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6384, "fingerprint": "2010|201000250|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000250|MARIN", "content_hash": "611fc0d9310ddd93", "measure_id": "201000250", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $42 (plus fifty cents County administrative fee) and incrementally increase if needed by $3, not to exceed $51 per year (plus fifty cent County administrative fee) per taxable living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure developed parcel in non-residential use in the fourth year, to be collected in addition to fees for transport to the hospital charged to insurance providesr for Ross Valley residents, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 840, "no_votes": 293, "total_votes": 1133, "percent_yes": 74.13945, "percent_no": 25.860550000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.982011", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.137787", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $42 (plus fifty cents County administrative fee) and incrementally increase if needed by $3, not to exceed $51 per year (plus fifty cent County administrative fee) per taxable living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure developed parcel in non-residential use in the fourth year, to be collected in addition to fees for transport to the hospital charged to insurance providesr for Ross Valley residents, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6385, "fingerprint": "2010|201000251|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000251|MARIN", "content_hash": "7fd7ec35cab9bc7b", "measure_id": "201000251", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $42.50 not exceeding $51.50 in the fourth year per taxable living unit or per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in non-residential use, to be collected in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers for Ross Valley residents, with the Town appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4334, "no_votes": 1645, "total_votes": 5979, "percent_yes": 72.48704000000001, "percent_no": 27.512959999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.982299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.137979", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $42.50 not exceeding $51.50 in the fourth year per taxable living unit or per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in non-residential use, to be collected in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers for Ross Valley residents, with the Town appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6386, "fingerprint": "2010|201000252|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000252|MARIN", "content_hash": "99270b7980a8ed9f", "measure_id": "201000252", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect lifesaving paramedic services by maintaining rapid response times, providing advanced heart attack treatment, and keeping trained paramedics on fire engine companies, shall San Rafael Municipal Code Chapter 3.28 be amended to permit phased increases, up to $23.00 annually above the current rate, on residential units, and up to $.03 per square foot annually above the current rate on non-residential structures; and, shall San Rafael's appropriations limit be correspondingly increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13588, "no_votes": 6265, "total_votes": 19853, "percent_yes": 68.443054, "percent_no": 31.556945999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.982679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.138169", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect lifesaving paramedic services by maintaining rapid response times, providing advanced heart attack treatment, and keeping trained paramedics on fire engine companies, shall San Rafael Municipal Code Chapter 3.28 be amended to permit phased increases, up to $23.00 annually above the current rate, on residential units, and up to $.03 per square foot annually above the current rate on non-residential structures; and, shall San Rafael's appropriations limit be correspondingly increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6380, "fingerprint": "2010|201000155|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000155|MARIN", "content_hash": "4817e6470c443dc4", "measure_id": "201000155", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect lifesaving paramedic services by maintaining rapid response times, providing advanced heart attack treatment, and keeping trained paramedics on fire engine companies, shall Ordinance No.3545 be approved to increase up to $23.00 annually the current rate on residential units, and up to $.0.03 per square foot annually the current rate on non-residential structures; and shall the County of Marin's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 548, "no_votes": 306, "total_votes": 854, "percent_yes": 64.16862, "percent_no": 35.831379999999996, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.980159", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.136635", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect lifesaving paramedic services by maintaining rapid response times, providing advanced heart attack treatment, and keeping trained paramedics on fire engine companies, shall Ordinance No.3545 be approved to increase up to $23.00 annually the current rate on residential units, and up to $.0.03 per square foot annually the current rate on non-residential structures; and shall the County of Marin's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6376, "fingerprint": "2010|201000151|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000151|MARIN", "content_hash": "1d0e14ea9e496fba", "measure_id": "201000151", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect lifesaving paramedic services by maintaining rapid response times, providing advanced heart attack treatment, and keeping trained paramedics on fire engine companies, shall Ordinance No.3546 be approved to increase up to $23.00 annually the current rate on non-residential units and up to $0.03 per square foot annually the current rate on non-residential structures; and shall the County of Marin's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1766, "no_votes": 900, "total_votes": 2666, "percent_yes": 66.24155999999999, "percent_no": 33.75844000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.978788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.135857", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect lifesaving paramedic services by maintaining rapid response times, providing advanced heart attack treatment, and keeping trained paramedics on fire engine companies, shall Ordinance No.3546 be approved to increase up to $23.00 annually the current rate on non-residential units and up to $0.03 per square foot annually the current rate on non-residential structures; and shall the County of Marin's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6377, "fingerprint": "2010|201000152|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000152|MARIN", "content_hash": "77a91c60b01a2a8b", "measure_id": "201000152", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $42.50 not exceeding $51.50 in the fourth year per taxable living unit or per 1,500 square feet of structure developed parcel in non-residential use, to be collected in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers for Ross Valley residents, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 549, "no_votes": 255, "total_votes": 804, "percent_yes": 68.28358, "percent_no": 31.71642, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.979113", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.136048", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a continuation of the four year special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $42.50 not exceeding $51.50 in the fourth year per taxable living unit or per 1,500 square feet of structure developed parcel in non-residential use, to be collected in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers for Ross Valley residents, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6378, "fingerprint": "2010|201000153|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000153|MARIN", "content_hash": "8b6cc744ee637533", "measure_id": "201000153", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect lifesaving paramedic services by maintaining rapid response times, providing advanced heart attack treatment, and keeping trained paramedics on fire engine companies, shall a special tax be approved to permit an increase of $24 annually above the current rate on residential units and shall the County of Marin's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3860, "no_votes": 1418, "total_votes": 5278, "percent_yes": 73.13376000000001, "percent_no": 26.86623999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.979511", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.136239", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect lifesaving paramedic services by maintaining rapid response times, providing advanced heart attack treatment, and keeping trained paramedics on fire engine companies, shall a special tax be approved to permit an increase of $24 annually above the current rate on residential units and shall the County of Marin's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6379, "fingerprint": "2010|201000154|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000154|MARIN", "content_hash": "306bbbfe4deb8954", "measure_id": "201000154", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain current fire suppression services and staffing, shall a special tax be approved to permit increases: $38 annually above the current rate on living units, $19 annually above the current rate on unimproved parcels and $57 above the current rate for improved commericial or industrial parcels; and shall the County of Marin's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3935, "no_votes": 2382, "total_votes": 6317, "percent_yes": 62.29223, "percent_no": 37.70777, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.979800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.136438", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain current fire suppression services and staffing, shall a special tax be approved to permit increases: $38 annually above the current rate on living units, $19 annually above the current rate on unimproved parcels and $57 above the current rate for improved commericial or industrial parcels; and shall the County of Marin's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6381, "fingerprint": "2010|201000156|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000156|MARIN", "content_hash": "e2470766d59d7150", "measure_id": "201000156", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain paramedic services in Marinwood and keep trained paramedics, shall Ordinance No. 20 be adopted to permit phased increases up to $23.00 annually above the current rate on residential units, and up to $.03 per square foot annually above the current rate on non-residential structures; and, shall Marinwood Community Services District appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1054, "no_votes": 1185, "total_votes": 2239, "percent_yes": 47.074586, "percent_no": 52.925414, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.980449", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.136828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain paramedic services in Marinwood and keep trained paramedics, shall Ordinance No. 20 be adopted to permit phased increases up to $23.00 annually above the current rate on residential units, and up to $.03 per square foot annually above the current rate on non-residential structures; and, shall Marinwood Community Services District appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6387, "fingerprint": "2010|201000109|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000109|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "449f0cbf491bdc31", "measure_id": "201000109", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities, including repairing, upgrading, and modernizing Anderson Valley Elementary, improving student access to modern technology at Anderson Valley Junior Senior High, improving energy efficiency, installing solar panels to reduce energy costs, and qualifying the District for $1.5 million in State aid, shall the Anderson Valley School District be authorized to issue $15,250,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries or overhead?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 551, "no_votes": 296, "total_votes": 847, "percent_yes": 65.05313000000001, "percent_no": 34.94686999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.983246", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.138554", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities, including repairing, upgrading, and modernizing Anderson Valley Elementary, improving student access to modern technology at Anderson Valley Junior Senior High, improving energy efficiency, installing solar panels to reduce energy costs, and qualifying the District for $1.5 million in State aid, shall the Anderson Valley School District be authorized to issue $15,250,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries or overhead?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6389, "fingerprint": "2010|201000111|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000111|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "5bb7f642b628ccf8", "measure_id": "201000111", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Willits Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, repair and improve local schools, including replacing portable facilities with permanent classrooms, improving student access to computers and technology, building vocational and technical classrooms, and making improvements to reduce annual operating costs and put more money in the classroom, by issuing up to $43,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are spent on administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2211, "no_votes": 1395, "total_votes": 3606, "percent_yes": 61.314476, "percent_no": 38.685524, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.983870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.138937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Willits Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, repair and improve local schools, including replacing portable facilities with permanent classrooms, improving student access to computers and technology, building vocational and technical classrooms, and making improvements to reduce annual operating costs and put more money in the classroom, by issuing up to $43,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are spent on administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6390, "fingerprint": "2010|201000157|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000157|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "1e18b837d1b3ea11", "measure_id": "201000157", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance titled \"County Vital Services Transactions and Use Tax\" be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8983, "no_votes": 20735, "total_votes": 29718, "percent_yes": 30.22747, "percent_no": 69.77253, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.984138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.139131", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance titled \"County Vital Services Transactions and Use Tax\" be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6388, "fingerprint": "2010|201000110|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000110|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "924e70a120a82523", "measure_id": "201000110", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, modernize and renovate all schools in the District, improve energy efficiency including installing solar panels, replace deteriorating plumbing and drainage systems, upgrade inadequate electrical systems, improve technology, modernize restrooms, and make health and safety improvements, shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District issue $25,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrator or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31, "no_votes": 18, "total_votes": 49, "percent_yes": 63.265306, "percent_no": 36.734694, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.983567", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.138744", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, modernize and renovate all schools in the District, improve energy efficiency including installing solar panels, replace deteriorating plumbing and drainage systems, upgrade inadequate electrical systems, improve technology, modernize restrooms, and make health and safety improvements, shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District issue $25,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrator or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6391, "fingerprint": "2010|201000145|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000145|MERCED", "content_hash": "290f33df5e14f9e5", "measure_id": "201000145", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Daniel Varela, Sr. be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor of the City of Livingston?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1141, "no_votes": 336, "total_votes": 1477, "percent_yes": 77.251184, "percent_no": 22.748816000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-31", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.984415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.139319", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Daniel Varela, Sr. be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor of the City of Livingston?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6392, "fingerprint": "2010|201000146|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000146|MERCED", "content_hash": "d97762eb14ca93ca", "measure_id": "201000146", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Martha Nateras be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember of the City of Livingston?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1135, "no_votes": 326, "total_votes": 1461, "percent_yes": 77.68652, "percent_no": 22.31348, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-31", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.984679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.139512", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Martha Nateras be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember of the City of Livingston?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6393, "fingerprint": "2010|201000158|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000158|MERCED", "content_hash": "af9e1a6f239c0e2b", "measure_id": "201000158", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance, which would amend the County's General Plan to require a confirming vote of the County electorate when the Board of Supervisors approves conversion of agricultural land to residential use, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19438, "no_votes": 24953, "total_votes": 44391, "percent_yes": 43.788156, "percent_no": 56.211844, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.984978", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.139765", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance, which would amend the County's General Plan to require a confirming vote of the County electorate when the Board of Supervisors approves conversion of agricultural land to residential use, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6394, "fingerprint": "2010|201000159|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000159|MERCED", "content_hash": "3c127bcb39cede55", "measure_id": "201000159", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance correcting and clarifying the Citizens' Right to Vote on Expansion of Residential Areas Initiative be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27446, "no_votes": 15704, "total_votes": 43150, "percent_yes": 63.606024000000005, "percent_no": 36.393975999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.985275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.139956", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance correcting and clarifying the Citizens' Right to Vote on Expansion of Residential Areas Initiative be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6395, "fingerprint": "2010|201000034|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000034|MODOC", "content_hash": "cd72ce749209cfa8", "measure_id": "201000034", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Alturas City Council be authorzied to continue a supplemental charge of $1.50 per meter to minimum water rates to fund mosquito abatement in the City of Alturas through June 30, 2014?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 771, "no_votes": 199, "total_votes": 970, "percent_yes": 79.484534, "percent_no": 20.515466000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.985545", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.140144", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Alturas City Council be authorzied to continue a supplemental charge of $1.50 per meter to minimum water rates to fund mosquito abatement in the City of Alturas through June 30, 2014?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6396, "fingerprint": "2010|201000141|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000141|MODOC", "content_hash": "c10789c9c9608d3b", "measure_id": "201000141", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on November 13, 2008 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Modoc County ordering the formation of a hospital district in the territory described, known as the Last Frontier Healthcare District, be approved: (NOTE: Formation of the District is contingent on an accompanying special tax measure.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1636, "no_votes": 696, "total_votes": 2332, "percent_yes": 70.154375, "percent_no": 29.845625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-31", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.985809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.140333", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on November 13, 2008 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Modoc County ordering the formation of a hospital district in the territory described, known as the Last Frontier Healthcare District, be approved: (NOTE: Formation of the District is contingent on an accompanying special tax measure.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6397, "fingerprint": "2010|201000035|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000035|MONO", "content_hash": "85a915ea806ce94b", "measure_id": "201000035", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Ordinance which permits up to two medical marijuana cooperatives in either the general commercial or industrial zones of the town be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 890, "no_votes": 693, "total_votes": 1583, "percent_yes": 56.22236, "percent_no": 43.77764, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.986085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.140528", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance which permits up to two medical marijuana cooperatives in either the general commercial or industrial zones of the town be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6398, "fingerprint": "2010|201000036|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000036|MONO", "content_hash": "d36d946f5c0f3de1", "measure_id": "201000036", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Ordinance which extends the Utility Users Tax with no Increase to the current rate of 2.5%, and  which restricts the use of funds to Mobility, Recreation, & Arts & Culture, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1062, "no_votes": 511, "total_votes": 1573, "percent_yes": 67.514306, "percent_no": 32.485693999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.986352", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.140716", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance which extends the Utility Users Tax with no Increase to the current rate of 2.5%, and  which restricts the use of funds to Mobility, Recreation, & Arts & Culture, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6406, "fingerprint": "2010|201000421|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000421|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a9982cb15e71b694", "measure_id": "201000421", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace inadequate electrical and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; upgrade computers and technology; improve energy efficiency; and make health and safety improvements shall the Coalinga-Huron Joint Unified School District issue $16,100,000 of existing bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 3, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.988674", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.142253", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace inadequate electrical and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; upgrade computers and technology; improve energy efficiency; and make health and safety improvements shall the Coalinga-Huron Joint Unified School District issue $16,100,000 of existing bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6399, "fingerprint": "2010|201000112|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000112|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a9d01a7ee698f8a7", "measure_id": "201000112", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, make health and safety improvements, modernize classrooms, renovate restrooms, upgrade computers/technology, improve energy efficiency including solar panel installation, replace old plumbing and windows, and modernize Greenfield Elementary School, shall Greenfield Union School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities by issuing $8,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money  used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 761, "no_votes": 515, "total_votes": 1276, "percent_yes": 59.639496, "percent_no": 40.360504, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.986622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.140910", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, make health and safety improvements, modernize classrooms, renovate restrooms, upgrade computers/technology, improve energy efficiency including solar panel installation, replace old plumbing and windows, and modernize Greenfield Elementary School, shall Greenfield Union School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities by issuing $8,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money  used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6401, "fingerprint": "2010|201000254|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000254|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "3377afdda3affa6d", "measure_id": "201000254", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve funding for general city services including but not limited to, maintaining firefighters and police officers for adequate emergency response, reducing crime and criminal gang and drug activity, maintaining city streets and parks, senior programs and youth after-school programs, shall the City of Marina adopt an ordinance enacting a temporary one percent (1%) transactions and use (sales) tax to automatically expire in five years, with all money staying locally to preserve Marina city services.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2966, "no_votes": 1765, "total_votes": 4731, "percent_yes": 62.692875, "percent_no": 37.307125, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.987266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.141292", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve funding for general city services including but not limited to, maintaining firefighters and police officers for adequate emergency response, reducing crime and criminal gang and drug activity, maintaining city streets and parks, senior programs and youth after-school programs, shall the City of Marina adopt an ordinance enacting a temporary one percent (1%) transactions and use (sales) tax to automatically expire in five years, with all money staying locally to preserve Marina city services.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6402, "fingerprint": "2010|201000255|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000255|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d43c21d5ec0bfb6d", "measure_id": "201000255", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve funding for general city services, including maintaining firefighters and police officers for adequate emergency response, reducing crime, maintaining city streets and parks, and senior and youth programs, shall the City of Marina temporarily increase the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) rate from ten percent to twelve percent with the increase to expire in five years and tax to revert to ten percent with all money staying locally to preserve Marina city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3385, "no_votes": 1318, "total_votes": 4703, "percent_yes": 71.97533, "percent_no": 28.02467, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.987571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.141484", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve funding for general city services, including maintaining firefighters and police officers for adequate emergency response, reducing crime, maintaining city streets and parks, and senior and youth programs, shall the City of Marina temporarily increase the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) rate from ten percent to twelve percent with the increase to expire in five years and tax to revert to ten percent with all money staying locally to preserve Marina city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6400, "fingerprint": "2010|201000253|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000253|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f4ccada33c5f03f3", "measure_id": "201000253", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposal charter for the City of King received and filed by the City Clerk on June 22, 2010 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 802, "no_votes": 514, "total_votes": 1316, "percent_yes": 60.94225, "percent_no": 39.05775, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.986967", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.141101", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposal charter for the City of King received and filed by the City Clerk on June 22, 2010 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6407, "fingerprint": "2010|201000422|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000422|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "af718af6fb755f13", "measure_id": "201000422", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local neighborhood elementary, middle/high schools, make funds available to attract/retain quality teachers and offset State cuts, repair/replace aging heating, plumbing and wiring, install educational classroom technology, improve utility and energy efficiency to save money for academic programs, improve school/student  safety, acquire, repair, construct, and equip classrooms/sites/school facilities, shall Monterey Peninsula Unified School District issue $110,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15558, "no_votes": 6187, "total_votes": 21745, "percent_yes": 71.547484, "percent_no": 28.452516000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.989011", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.142442", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local neighborhood elementary, middle/high schools, make funds available to attract/retain quality teachers and offset State cuts, repair/replace aging heating, plumbing and wiring, install educational classroom technology, improve utility and energy efficiency to save money for academic programs, improve school/student  safety, acquire, repair, construct, and equip classrooms/sites/school facilities, shall Monterey Peninsula Unified School District issue $110,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6403, "fingerprint": "2010|201000256|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000256|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "8d2f91a539d3a6d4", "measure_id": "201000256", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a new Chapter 6.70 be added to the Pacific Grove Municipal Code to impose a tax at the rate of $90.00 per year for all Owners of Parcels in the City of Pacific Grove as well as $45.00 per year per unit for multi-Common Household units, in order to create a dedicated and restricted revenue source solely to provide, maintain, and improve core library services for the Pacific Grove public library in the City of Pacific Grove such?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4109, "no_votes": 2542, "total_votes": 6651, "percent_yes": 61.780185, "percent_no": 38.219815, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.987837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.141677", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a new Chapter 6.70 be added to the Pacific Grove Municipal Code to impose a tax at the rate of $90.00 per year for all Owners of Parcels in the City of Pacific Grove as well as $45.00 per year per unit for multi-Common Household units, in order to create a dedicated and restricted revenue source solely to provide, maintain, and improve core library services for the Pacific Grove public library in the City of Pacific Grove such?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6404, "fingerprint": "2010|201000257|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000257|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "9c75307966decd58", "measure_id": "201000257", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Pacific Grove City Charter be amended to conform to the \"Voter Initiative Limiting the Ability of the City of Pacific Grove to Approve or Modify Agreements That Provide Retirement Benefits to City Employees,\" provide City officers/employees do not hold rights to future employment or future employment benefits, and amend the Pacific Grove Municipal Code to clarify that voter-approved limits relating to long-term City debt or financial liabilities apply only to retirement plans or agreements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4390, "no_votes": 1572, "total_votes": 5962, "percent_yes": 73.63301, "percent_no": 26.36699, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.988104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.141870", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Pacific Grove City Charter be amended to conform to the \"Voter Initiative Limiting the Ability of the City of Pacific Grove to Approve or Modify Agreements That Provide Retirement Benefits to City Employees,\" provide City officers/employees do not hold rights to future employment or future employment benefits, and amend the Pacific Grove Municipal Code to clarify that voter-approved limits relating to long-term City debt or financial liabilities apply only to retirement plans or agreements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6405, "fingerprint": "2010|201000420|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000420|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "6c8348ce2d318f6b", "measure_id": "201000420", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of public education, attract qualified teachers, provide up-to-date science labs/classrooms/technology without increasing current tax rates, shall Aromas San Juan Unified School District equip classrooms with effective heating and cooling systems, upgrade aging plumbing, lighting/electrical systems, renovate restrooms, cafeteria, pay off facilities loans, repair, construct school facilities/acquire equipment, by issuing $9,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, no administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 596, "no_votes": 512, "total_votes": 1108, "percent_yes": 53.79061000000001, "percent_no": 46.20938999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.988372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.142063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of public education, attract qualified teachers, provide up-to-date science labs/classrooms/technology without increasing current tax rates, shall Aromas San Juan Unified School District equip classrooms with effective heating and cooling systems, upgrade aging plumbing, lighting/electrical systems, renovate restrooms, cafeteria, pay off facilities loans, repair, construct school facilities/acquire equipment, by issuing $9,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, no administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6412, "fingerprint": "2010|201000423|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000423|NAPA", "content_hash": "8956d91ad502df11", "measure_id": "201000423", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and improve Calistoga schools, improve school libraries, upgrade classrooms, modernize computer networks, build a new gym and cafeteria, install solar energy systems, replace aging roofs, old heating, electrical, plumbing, cooling and ventilation systems with energy efficient systems, shall the Calistoga Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $42,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries and all expenditures monitored by an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1388, "no_votes": 750, "total_votes": 2138, "percent_yes": 64.920485, "percent_no": 35.079515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.990442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.143454", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and improve Calistoga schools, improve school libraries, upgrade classrooms, modernize computer networks, build a new gym and cafeteria, install solar energy systems, replace aging roofs, old heating, electrical, plumbing, cooling and ventilation systems with energy efficient systems, shall the Calistoga Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $42,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries and all expenditures monitored by an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6413, "fingerprint": "2010|201000424|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000424|NAPA", "content_hash": "bcd596dad1655fc1", "measure_id": "201000424", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve academic, college and career achievement, shall the Saint Helena Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities, career, technical and vocational classrooms, science labs, improve student access to classroom technology, and plan for the future, by issuing bonds not to exceed thirty million dollars at legal interest rates with no increase in existing tax rates, establish a citizen's oversight committee, conduct annual independent audits, and no bond monies for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2545, "no_votes": 1641, "total_votes": 4186, "percent_yes": 60.797900000000006, "percent_no": 39.202099999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.990712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.143648", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve academic, college and career achievement, shall the Saint Helena Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities, career, technical and vocational classrooms, science labs, improve student access to classroom technology, and plan for the future, by issuing bonds not to exceed thirty million dollars at legal interest rates with no increase in existing tax rates, establish a citizen's oversight committee, conduct annual independent audits, and no bond monies for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6411, "fingerprint": "2010|201000260|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000260|NAPA", "content_hash": "4d9ad8408ce74920", "measure_id": "201000260", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset state budget cuts, stabilize City finances, and to maintain and protect essential City services; shall the City of St. Helena adopt an ordinance enacting a one half of one percent transactions and use tax, automatically expiring in five years, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits and all money staying local to preserve St. Helena city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 884, "no_votes": 1362, "total_votes": 2246, "percent_yes": 39.35886, "percent_no": 60.64114, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.990142", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.143264", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset state budget cuts, stabilize City finances, and to maintain and protect essential City services; shall the City of St. Helena adopt an ordinance enacting a one half of one percent transactions and use tax, automatically expiring in five years, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits and all money staying local to preserve St. Helena city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6409, "fingerprint": "2010|201000258|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000258|NAPA", "content_hash": "e7df474934cfbe46", "measure_id": "201000258", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve funding for essential public services in American Canyon, including parks, recreation, police, streets and libraries, shall the City of American Canyon approve an ordinance amending the American Canyon Municipal Code to increase the rate of the City\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax (\u201cHotel Visitor\u2019s Tax\u201d) from 10% to12% on the rate charged to hotel guests within the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3660, "no_votes": 1016, "total_votes": 4676, "percent_yes": 78.272027, "percent_no": 21.727973000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.989559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.142858", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve funding for essential public services in American Canyon, including parks, recreation, police, streets and libraries, shall the City of American Canyon approve an ordinance amending the American Canyon Municipal Code to increase the rate of the City\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax (\u201cHotel Visitor\u2019s Tax\u201d) from 10% to12% on the rate charged to hotel guests within the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6410, "fingerprint": "2010|201000259|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000259|NAPA", "content_hash": "11cb845d590a93af", "measure_id": "201000259", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve funding for essential public services in American Canyon, including parks, recreation, police, streets and libraries, shall the City of American Canyon approve an ordinance authorizing a \u201cCardroom Admission Tax\u201d a new general tax in the amount of $2.00 per patron for the right or privilege of being admitted to or to use any cardroom establishment, or to participate in any cardroom event?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3493, "no_votes": 1164, "total_votes": 4657, "percent_yes": 75.00537, "percent_no": 24.99463, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.989835", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.143062", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve funding for essential public services in American Canyon, including parks, recreation, police, streets and libraries, shall the City of American Canyon approve an ordinance authorizing a \u201cCardroom Admission Tax\u201d a new general tax in the amount of $2.00 per patron for the right or privilege of being admitted to or to use any cardroom establishment, or to participate in any cardroom event?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6408, "fingerprint": "2010|201000160|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000160|NAPA", "content_hash": "c6397188713d4cff", "measure_id": "201000160", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to maintain and preserve vital public services, street maintenance and police and fire emergency medical service programs, shall the appropriations limit set pursuant to Article 13B of the California Constitution be increased by the amount of $900,000 in additional funds each year for a four year period commencing with fiscal year 2010/11? By approving this appropriation limit, no new taxes will be create nor will any existing tax be increased.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1103, "no_votes": 288, "total_votes": 1391, "percent_yes": 79.29547, "percent_no": 20.704530000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.989280", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.142666", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain and preserve vital public services, street maintenance and police and fire emergency medical service programs, shall the appropriations limit set pursuant to Article 13B of the California Constitution be increased by the amount of $900,000 in additional funds each year for a four year period commencing with fiscal year 2010/11? By approving this appropriation limit, no new taxes will be create nor will any existing tax be increased.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6414, "fingerprint": "2010|201000161|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000161|NEVADA", "content_hash": "72d7b763fd89d0a5", "measure_id": "201000161", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on May 12, 2010, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Nevada County ordering the formation of the Oak Tree Community Park and Recreation District in the territory described, be approved subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 580, "no_votes": 205, "total_votes": 785, "percent_yes": 73.88535, "percent_no": 26.114649999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.990979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.143840", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on May 12, 2010, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Nevada County ordering the formation of the Oak Tree Community Park and Recreation District in the territory described, be approved subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11493, "fingerprint": "2010|201000426|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000426|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3c2086ad3b5496d2", "measure_id": "201000426", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Michael S. Winsten be recalled (removed) from the Office of Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 3?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62208, "no_votes": 39187, "total_votes": 101395, "percent_yes": 61.35214, "percent_no": 38.64786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.162219", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.997771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.148444", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Michael S. Winsten be recalled (removed) from the Office of Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 3?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6415, "fingerprint": "2010|201000002|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000002|ORANGE", "content_hash": "21fde05114e21329", "measure_id": "201000002", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Lance MacLean be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7370, "no_votes": 7351, "total_votes": 14721, "percent_yes": 50.064534, "percent_no": 49.935466, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-02-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.991296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.144032", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Lance MacLean be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6438, "fingerprint": "2010|201000427|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000427|ORANGE", "content_hash": "16caadb31a6bf889", "measure_id": "201000427", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Ken Maddox be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 5?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61495, "no_votes": 38859, "total_votes": 100354, "percent_yes": 61.278075, "percent_no": 38.721925, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.998039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.148634", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ken Maddox be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 5?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6419, "fingerprint": "2010|201000114|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000114|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b80b5364bba8b1b6", "measure_id": "201000114", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide Garden Grove Unified School District students with competitive classrooms and school facilities, improve student health/safety, qualify for $200,000,000 in State funds, shall Garden Grove Unified School District repair, renovate, acquire, construct and equip classrooms, sites, school facilities, make earthquake safety improvements, repair/replace aging roofs, plumbing, heating/ventilation systems, upgrade electrical wiring, fire, security equipment by issuing $250,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21149, "no_votes": 12019, "total_votes": 33168, "percent_yes": 63.763267, "percent_no": 36.236733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.992417", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.144797", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide Garden Grove Unified School District students with competitive classrooms and school facilities, improve student health/safety, qualify for $200,000,000 in State funds, shall Garden Grove Unified School District repair, renovate, acquire, construct and equip classrooms, sites, school facilities, make earthquake safety improvements, repair/replace aging roofs, plumbing, heating/ventilation systems, upgrade electrical wiring, fire, security equipment by issuing $250,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6434, "fingerprint": "2010|201000275|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000275|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f59a3abe6960ade3", "measure_id": "201000275", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 9.64 of the Westminster Municipal Code prohibiting the possession, storage, sale, and use of state-approved fireworks in the City of Westminster, be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14360, "no_votes": 8264, "total_votes": 22624, "percent_yes": 63.47242, "percent_no": 36.52758, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.996645", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.147677", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 9.64 of the Westminster Municipal Code prohibiting the possession, storage, sale, and use of state-approved fireworks in the City of Westminster, be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6418, "fingerprint": "2010|201000113|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000113|ORANGE", "content_hash": "5958fd2866ced895", "measure_id": "201000113", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent deep cuts in Buena Park elementary and middle school educational programs; retain qualified, experienced teachers; keep school libraries open; and maintain school campuses, nurses/health and counseling services, music and physical education programs; shall Buena Park School District levy an annual tax of $.0375 per square foot of building space per each assessor's parcel, for 4 years only, with independent oversight, an exemption for senior citizens, and all funds benefiting neighborhood K-8 schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2334, "no_votes": 2183, "total_votes": 4517, "percent_yes": 51.671463, "percent_no": 48.328537, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.992150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.144607", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent deep cuts in Buena Park elementary and middle school educational programs; retain qualified, experienced teachers; keep school libraries open; and maintain school campuses, nurses/health and counseling services, music and physical education programs; shall Buena Park School District levy an annual tax of $.0375 per square foot of building space per each assessor's parcel, for 4 years only, with independent oversight, an exemption for senior citizens, and all funds benefiting neighborhood K-8 schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6416, "fingerprint": "2010|201000037|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000037|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0ac96d2d4f1284be", "measure_id": "201000037", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should an ordinance be adopted confirming the General Plan Designation for the Orange County Fair and Event Center as it is set forth in the General Plan as amended by GP-09-01 which amended the fairground land use designation in the Land Use Element of the 2000 general Plan to describe and maintain current fair and event uses on the site and requiring that further amendment be made only upon majority vote of the electorate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13000, "no_votes": 1829, "total_votes": 14829, "percent_yes": 87.66606, "percent_no": 12.333939999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.991614", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.144220", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should an ordinance be adopted confirming the General Plan Designation for the Orange County Fair and Event Center as it is set forth in the General Plan as amended by GP-09-01 which amended the fairground land use designation in the Land Use Element of the 2000 general Plan to describe and maintain current fair and event uses on the site and requiring that further amendment be made only upon majority vote of the electorate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6417, "fingerprint": "2010|201000062|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000062|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8c7ae86336477619", "measure_id": "201000062", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance requiring voter approval of certain amendments to the City of Mission Viejo's land use laws, documents, or regulations if those amendments change the zoning of residential parcels or commercial or industrial parcels larger than two acres, increase the number of units or parcels on a residential parcel, provide for private development of public land, or make other specified changes, and specifying procedures for hearings on other land use law amendments, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7891, "no_votes": 13072, "total_votes": 20963, "percent_yes": 37.642512, "percent_no": 62.357488, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.991882", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.144412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance requiring voter approval of certain amendments to the City of Mission Viejo's land use laws, documents, or regulations if those amendments change the zoning of residential parcels or commercial or industrial parcels larger than two acres, increase the number of units or parcels on a residential parcel, provide for private development of public land, or make other specified changes, and specifying procedures for hearings on other land use law amendments, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6437, "fingerprint": "2010|201000425|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000425|ORANGE", "content_hash": "522ff2958e0a58f7", "measure_id": "201000425", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local elementary schools by fixing leaky roofs, deteriorating restrooms, plumbing, sewer systems, wiring, dry rot, termite damage; removing asbestos/other hazardous materials; improving fire/school safety; improving classroom instructional technology for teaching math, science and 21st-century skills; relieving overcrowding; and qualifying for up to $84 million in state matching funds, shall Anaheim City (elementary) School District issue $169,300,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19550, "no_votes": 11030, "total_votes": 30580, "percent_yes": 63.93067, "percent_no": 36.06933, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.997496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.148253", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local elementary schools by fixing leaky roofs, deteriorating restrooms, plumbing, sewer systems, wiring, dry rot, termite damage; removing asbestos/other hazardous materials; improving fire/school safety; improving classroom instructional technology for teaching math, science and 21st-century skills; relieving overcrowding; and qualifying for up to $84 million in state matching funds, shall Anaheim City (elementary) School District issue $169,300,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6439, "fingerprint": "2010|201000428|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000428|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e327f91e18610f33", "measure_id": "201000428", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the election of one member of the governing board of the Capistrano Unified School District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71096, "no_votes": 37718, "total_votes": 108814, "percent_yes": 65.33717999999999, "percent_no": 34.66282000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.998301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.148824", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the election of one member of the governing board of the Capistrano Unified School District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6440, "fingerprint": "2010|201000429|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000429|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b9f1d269cc0fd037", "measure_id": "201000429", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade technology; repair leaky roofs; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; make handicapped accessibility upgrades; install solar panels to improve energy efficiency; replace temporary portable calssrooms; and increase campus secutiry; shall the Magnolia School District issue $16,300,000 of bonds at legal interst rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6366, "no_votes": 3327, "total_votes": 9693, "percent_yes": 65.67626, "percent_no": 34.32374, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.998781", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.149016", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; upgrade technology; repair leaky roofs; modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; make handicapped accessibility upgrades; install solar panels to improve energy efficiency; replace temporary portable calssrooms; and increase campus secutiry; shall the Magnolia School District issue $16,300,000 of bonds at legal interst rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6420, "fingerprint": "2010|201000261|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000261|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a786d1f8e5698968", "measure_id": "201000261", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1212 be added to the City Charter to authorize the use of design-build procurement for public works projects in the City of Anaheim?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38404, "no_votes": 21268, "total_votes": 59672, "percent_yes": 64.35849, "percent_no": 35.64151, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.992683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.144989", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1212 be added to the City Charter to authorize the use of design-build procurement for public works projects in the City of Anaheim?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6421, "fingerprint": "2010|201000262|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000262|ORANGE", "content_hash": "97fb59b9139a7a21", "measure_id": "201000262", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1213 be added to the City Charter to prohibit the use of red light cameras or other automated traffic enforcement systems in the City of Anaheim?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47246, "no_votes": 17688, "total_votes": 64934, "percent_yes": 72.76003399999999, "percent_no": 27.23996600000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.992976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.145177", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1213 be added to the City Charter to prohibit the use of red light cameras or other automated traffic enforcement systems in the City of Anaheim?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6422, "fingerprint": "2010|201000263|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000263|ORANGE", "content_hash": "19baac6b529240aa", "measure_id": "201000263", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City increase the existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 6% to 8%, which tax is, and will continue to be, imposed only on transients occupying hotels and motels within the City, for the funding of general city services and programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14227, "no_votes": 13048, "total_votes": 27275, "percent_yes": 52.16132, "percent_no": 47.83868, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.993273", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.145365", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 6% to 8%, which tax is, and will continue to be, imposed only on transients occupying hotels and motels within the City, for the funding of general city services and programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6423, "fingerprint": "2010|201000264|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000264|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a17542e2722e679a", "measure_id": "201000264", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to enact term limits upon members of the Fullerton City Council, preventing any person who serves three (3) successive terms from serving again until an intervening period of four (4) years has elapsed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27559, "no_votes": 7077, "total_votes": 34636, "percent_yes": 79.567504, "percent_no": 20.432496, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.993542", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.145556", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to enact term limits upon members of the Fullerton City Council, preventing any person who serves three (3) successive terms from serving again until an intervening period of four (4) years has elapsed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6424, "fingerprint": "2010|201000265|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000265|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8f3e352070a7968b", "measure_id": "201000265", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall proposed Charter Amendment No.1, revising and restating the Charter of the City of Huntington Beach (exculding changes to Section 617 entitled Infrastructure Fund) as set forth in the proposed measure be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30084, "no_votes": 24543, "total_votes": 54627, "percent_yes": 55.07167, "percent_no": 44.92833, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.993811", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.145745", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall proposed Charter Amendment No.1, revising and restating the Charter of the City of Huntington Beach (exculding changes to Section 617 entitled Infrastructure Fund) as set forth in the proposed measure be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6425, "fingerprint": "2010|201000266|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000266|ORANGE", "content_hash": "bc19e58093537ae1", "measure_id": "201000266", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall proposed Charter Amendment No.2, amending Section 617 of the Charter of the City of Huntington Beach entitled Infrastructure Fund, as set forth in the proposed measure be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26343, "no_votes": 31555, "total_votes": 57898, "percent_yes": 45.498982, "percent_no": 54.501018, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.994078", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.145937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall proposed Charter Amendment No.2, amending Section 617 of the Charter of the City of Huntington Beach entitled Infrastructure Fund, as set forth in the proposed measure be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6426, "fingerprint": "2010|201000267|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000267|ORANGE", "content_hash": "7febdbc776503add", "measure_id": "201000267", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City permit the installation of a mobile telephone antenna at Harbour View Park located at 16600 Saybrook Lane and at Bolsa View Park located at 5741 Brighton Drive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27674, "no_votes": 35834, "total_votes": 63508, "percent_yes": 43.575612, "percent_no": 56.424388, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.994342", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.146129", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City permit the installation of a mobile telephone antenna at Harbour View Park located at 16600 Saybrook Lane and at Bolsa View Park located at 5741 Brighton Drive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6427, "fingerprint": "2010|201000268|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000268|ORANGE", "content_hash": "38746d6a648a50cf", "measure_id": "201000268", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted to direct the City of Irvine to continue financial support to Irvine schools, through the Irvine Educational Partnership Fund and the Challenge Match Grant programs, on the same general terms and conditions and at same general levels as approved in Fiscal Year 2010-2011, for three additional fiscal years commencing with Fiscal Year 2011-2012?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40861, "no_votes": 11415, "total_votes": 52276, "percent_yes": 78.163975, "percent_no": 21.836025000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.994609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.146320", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted to direct the City of Irvine to continue financial support to Irvine schools, through the Irvine Educational Partnership Fund and the Challenge Match Grant programs, on the same general terms and conditions and at same general levels as approved in Fiscal Year 2010-2011, for three additional fiscal years commencing with Fiscal Year 2011-2012?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6428, "fingerprint": "2010|201000269|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000269|ORANGE", "content_hash": "46f2da88219e5945", "measure_id": "201000269", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of Irvine to ratify and implement policies in support of renewable energy and environmental programs for a sustainable community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35239, "no_votes": 17479, "total_votes": 52718, "percent_yes": 66.844344, "percent_no": 33.15565599999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.994873", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.146538", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of Irvine to ratify and implement policies in support of renewable energy and environmental programs for a sustainable community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6430, "fingerprint": "2010|201000271|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000271|ORANGE", "content_hash": "120da6710bb51f67", "measure_id": "201000271", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Laguna Hills Municipal Code Section 2-04.080 be adopted to establish that any person who has served two (2) consecutive terms of office as a member of the City Council is not eligible to hold office again as a member of the City Council until the expiration of at least two (2) years following the conclusion of such person's last term of office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7919, "no_votes": 2749, "total_votes": 10668, "percent_yes": 74.23134399999999, "percent_no": 25.768656000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.995474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.146917", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Laguna Hills Municipal Code Section 2-04.080 be adopted to establish that any person who has served two (2) consecutive terms of office as a member of the City Council is not eligible to hold office again as a member of the City Council until the expiration of at least two (2) years following the conclusion of such person's last term of office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6429, "fingerprint": "2010|201000270|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000270|ORANGE", "content_hash": "99eec431b6683634", "measure_id": "201000270", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Initiative Ordinance 10-01, authorizing the City Council to annually reduce the rate of the Utility Users Tax to a lower rate than the law currently allows, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4387, "no_votes": 391, "total_votes": 4778, "percent_yes": 91.81666, "percent_no": 8.183340000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.995175", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.146729", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Initiative Ordinance 10-01, authorizing the City Council to annually reduce the rate of the Utility Users Tax to a lower rate than the law currently allows, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6431, "fingerprint": "2010|201000272|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000272|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ab6fa3a31845bf0a", "measure_id": "201000272", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended and ordinances repealed to: close Charter loopholes that circumvent Proposition 13; restrict oil operations; amend legal document publication requirements; simplify franchise processes; increase formal bidding thresholds; adjust misdemeanor penalties; require redistricting appointments every ten years; amend Civil Service System; repeal Chamber of Commerce contribution limit; remove City contract term limitations; require vote for the sale of City owned waterfront property; make administrative changes to comply with state and federal law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19777, "no_votes": 12362, "total_votes": 32139, "percent_yes": 61.53583, "percent_no": 38.46417, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.995755", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.147107", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended and ordinances repealed to: close Charter loopholes that circumvent Proposition 13; restrict oil operations; amend legal document publication requirements; simplify franchise processes; increase formal bidding thresholds; adjust misdemeanor penalties; require redistricting appointments every ten years; amend Civil Service System; repeal Chamber of Commerce contribution limit; remove City contract term limitations; require vote for the sale of City owned waterfront property; make administrative changes to comply with state and federal law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6432, "fingerprint": "2010|201000273|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000273|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4c3ac41b54d01120", "measure_id": "201000273", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without raising current tax rates and to preserve funding for critical city services, including police, fire, 911 emergency response, street repair, graffiti removal, park maintenance, and other city services; shall the City of Placentia's existing utility user tax ordinance be amended to reflect changes in technology and Federal law, treating taxpayers equally regardless of technology services used; including exemptions available for low-income residents, independent audits, with all funds dedicated to preserving Placentia city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8975, "no_votes": 5642, "total_votes": 14617, "percent_yes": 61.40111, "percent_no": 38.59889, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.996022", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.147297", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without raising current tax rates and to preserve funding for critical city services, including police, fire, 911 emergency response, street repair, graffiti removal, park maintenance, and other city services; shall the City of Placentia's existing utility user tax ordinance be amended to reflect changes in technology and Federal law, treating taxpayers equally regardless of technology services used; including exemptions available for low-income residents, independent audits, with all funds dedicated to preserving Placentia city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6433, "fingerprint": "2010|201000274|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000274|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "201000274", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9551, "no_votes": 5911, "total_votes": 15462, "percent_yes": 61.77079, "percent_no": 38.22921, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.996314", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.147488", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6435, "fingerprint": "2010|201000276|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000276|ORANGE", "content_hash": "779afb781809eb27", "measure_id": "201000276", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance titled the \"Yorba Linda Ethics Ordinance\" be adopted to ensure that the highest level of ethics is practiced by all elected and appointed officials and staff that serve the City of Yorba Linda?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22415, "no_votes": 3937, "total_votes": 26352, "percent_yes": 85.05996, "percent_no": 14.940039999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.996951", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.147867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance titled the \"Yorba Linda Ethics Ordinance\" be adopted to ensure that the highest level of ethics is practiced by all elected and appointed officials and staff that serve the City of Yorba Linda?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6436, "fingerprint": "2010|201000277|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000277|ORANGE", "content_hash": "03fd28daf2bc8585", "measure_id": "201000277", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the Yorba Linda General Plan and approving a zone change to permit the development of affordable housing up to a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre and a maximum height of 45 feet within the Savi Ranch Planned Development zone?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13147, "no_votes": 13344, "total_votes": 26491, "percent_yes": 49.628174, "percent_no": 50.371826, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.997221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.148065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the Yorba Linda General Plan and approving a zone change to permit the development of affordable housing up to a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre and a maximum height of 45 feet within the Savi Ranch Planned Development zone?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6442, "fingerprint": "2010|201000279|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000279|PLACER", "content_hash": "8acb284c20420c6a", "measure_id": "201000279", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the proposed ordinance entitled \"An Initiative of the Loomis Town Citizens Enacting Term Limits\" which provides: (1) five council members serve 4-year terms; (2) terms shall be staggered; (3) no member can serve more than two consecutive 4-year terms; (4) a member who has served two terms prior to August 1, 2010 must sit out eight years; and (5) current members can complete their terms, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1555, "no_votes": 1256, "total_votes": 2811, "percent_yes": 55.31839, "percent_no": 44.68161, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.999511", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.149402", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the proposed ordinance entitled \"An Initiative of the Loomis Town Citizens Enacting Term Limits\" which provides: (1) five council members serve 4-year terms; (2) terms shall be staggered; (3) no member can serve more than two consecutive 4-year terms; (4) a member who has served two terms prior to August 1, 2010 must sit out eight years; and (5) current members can complete their terms, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6443, "fingerprint": "2010|201000280|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000280|PLACER", "content_hash": "057d34797c178eca", "measure_id": "201000280", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended: (1) Out-of-date provisions: sections 1.055, 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 2.12, 3.02, 3.03, 4.02, 4.05, 5.03; (2) Up-dated provisions: sections: 2.14, 3.09, 8.02, 8.03, 8.04, 8.05, 8.07, 9.01; (3) Typographical corrections: sections 4.06, 6.01; (4) Minor procedural changes: section 1.05, 2.04, 2.09; (5) Capitalizing the word City, replacing the word member with councilmember, and adding the word City to all named officials?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27844, "no_votes": 7798, "total_votes": 35642, "percent_yes": 78.121316, "percent_no": 21.878684000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.999783", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.149592", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended: (1) Out-of-date provisions: sections 1.055, 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 2.12, 3.02, 3.03, 4.02, 4.05, 5.03; (2) Up-dated provisions: sections: 2.14, 3.09, 8.02, 8.03, 8.04, 8.05, 8.07, 9.01; (3) Typographical corrections: sections 4.06, 6.01; (4) Minor procedural changes: section 1.05, 2.04, 2.09; (5) Capitalizing the word City, replacing the word member with councilmember, and adding the word City to all named officials?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6444, "fingerprint": "2010|201000281|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000281|PLACER", "content_hash": "5d516e550eb24770", "measure_id": "201000281", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended as follows: (1) Section 2.02, providing that a partial City Council term served due to appointment to a vacant council seat does not count as a term for the purposes of this section; and (2) Section 2.05, changing title of mayor pro tempore to vice mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21449, "no_votes": 13809, "total_votes": 35258, "percent_yes": 60.83442, "percent_no": 39.16558, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.000051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.149781", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended as follows: (1) Section 2.02, providing that a partial City Council term served due to appointment to a vacant council seat does not count as a term for the purposes of this section; and (2) Section 2.05, changing title of mayor pro tempore to vice mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6445, "fingerprint": "2010|201000282|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000282|PLACER", "content_hash": "8e097a84ef52ba22", "measure_id": "201000282", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended as follows: (1) Section 2.03, modifying the time frame for assumption of office by, and seating of, elected councilmembers, to conform to California Elections Code \u00a715372?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28018, "no_votes": 6708, "total_votes": 34726, "percent_yes": 80.683064, "percent_no": 19.316936, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.000320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.149970", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended as follows: (1) Section 2.03, modifying the time frame for assumption of office by, and seating of, elected councilmembers, to conform to California Elections Code \u00a715372?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6446, "fingerprint": "2010|201000283|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000283|PLACER", "content_hash": "8e2e8df4e10b89c1", "measure_id": "201000283", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended with respect to minor fiscal matters as follows: (1) Section 7.09 and 7.10, updating Charter to conform to changes in state tax and assessment law beginning with the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978; (2) Section 7.095 deleting and reserving section; (3) Minor procedural and typographical amendments: sections 7.05, 7.06, 7.15, 7.19 and 7.20?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24403, "no_votes": 9099, "total_votes": 33502, "percent_yes": 72.84043, "percent_no": 27.159570000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.000605", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.150164", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended with respect to minor fiscal matters as follows: (1) Section 7.09 and 7.10, updating Charter to conform to changes in state tax and assessment law beginning with the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978; (2) Section 7.095 deleting and reserving section; (3) Minor procedural and typographical amendments: sections 7.05, 7.06, 7.15, 7.19 and 7.20?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6447, "fingerprint": "2010|201000284|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000284|PLACER", "content_hash": "50f12818e074e353", "measure_id": "201000284", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended with regard to certain fiscal matters as follows: (1) Section 7.21, allowing adoption of an ordinance establishing bidding preference for businesses located within the City of Roseville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14604, "no_votes": 19562, "total_votes": 34166, "percent_yes": 42.74425, "percent_no": 57.25575, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.000901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.150357", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended with regard to certain fiscal matters as follows: (1) Section 7.21, allowing adoption of an ordinance establishing bidding preference for businesses located within the City of Roseville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6448, "fingerprint": "2010|201000285|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000285|PLACER", "content_hash": "b3d587569341236a", "measure_id": "201000285", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended with regard to certain fiscal matters as follows: (1) Section 7.21, increasing dollar amout of items requiring a sealed bid from $10,000 to $19,500?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20149, "no_votes": 13962, "total_votes": 34111, "percent_yes": 59.068924, "percent_no": 40.931076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.001202", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.150546", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended with regard to certain fiscal matters as follows: (1) Section 7.21, increasing dollar amout of items requiring a sealed bid from $10,000 to $19,500?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6449, "fingerprint": "2010|201000286|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000286|PLACER", "content_hash": "a25f6a811dbb14ec", "measure_id": "201000286", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended as follows: (1) Section 2.02, providing that term limits be modified from two (2) consecutive four (4) year terms to three (3) terms of four (4) years each, such that a person would be ineligible to hold office after serving on the Council for three (3) four (4) year terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10996, "no_votes": 23996, "total_votes": 34992, "percent_yes": 31.424326, "percent_no": 68.57567399999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.001473", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.150738", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended as follows: (1) Section 2.02, providing that term limits be modified from two (2) consecutive four (4) year terms to three (3) terms of four (4) years each, such that a person would be ineligible to hold office after serving on the Council for three (3) four (4) year terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6451, "fingerprint": "2010|201000431|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000431|PLACER", "content_hash": "db370561e4116f31", "measure_id": "201000431", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To help protect local schools from state budget cuts, improve the quality of education at all our local schools, modernize classroom technology and job training programs, construct new science and computer labs, improve school safety, build new classrooms and become eligible for millions in additional state school construction grants, shall the Western Placer Unified School District issue $163 million in bonds at lawful interest rates with citizens' oversight and no money for adminsitrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9045, "no_votes": 11249, "total_votes": 20294, "percent_yes": 44.569823, "percent_no": 55.430177, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.002020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.151130", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help protect local schools from state budget cuts, improve the quality of education at all our local schools, modernize classroom technology and job training programs, construct new science and computer labs, improve school safety, build new classrooms and become eligible for millions in additional state school construction grants, shall the Western Placer Unified School District issue $163 million in bonds at lawful interest rates with citizens' oversight and no money for adminsitrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6441, "fingerprint": "2010|201000278|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000278|PLACER", "content_hash": "4e2167858de299da", "measure_id": "201000278", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help maintain and protect Lincoln's financial viability and essential sevices including 9-1-1 emergency/medical response times, helping prevent cuts to police officers, firefighters, library and recreation services, shall the City of Lincoln establish a temporary 3.75% utility users tax ordinance that expires in 4 years, with annual independent audits, public expenditure reports, citizens oversight, low-income senior exemptions, with all revenue dedicated solely for Lincoln and not the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5888, "no_votes": 11734, "total_votes": 17622, "percent_yes": 33.412778, "percent_no": 66.587222, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:10.999199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.149211", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help maintain and protect Lincoln's financial viability and essential sevices including 9-1-1 emergency/medical response times, helping prevent cuts to police officers, firefighters, library and recreation services, shall the City of Lincoln establish a temporary 3.75% utility users tax ordinance that expires in 4 years, with annual independent audits, public expenditure reports, citizens oversight, low-income senior exemptions, with all revenue dedicated solely for Lincoln and not the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6450, "fingerprint": "2010|201000430|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000430|PLACER", "content_hash": "a5d2e158fadd75fb", "measure_id": "201000430", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve quality education, protect schools from state budget cuts and provide stable funding that cannot be taken by the state to preserve reading, math and science instruction; maintain hands-on science programs, classes and labs, maintain reading and language programs for all students; and attract and retain qualified teachers, shall Auburn Union School District levy $59 per parcel annually for 5 years with an exemption for seniors, independent oversight and no money for adminsitrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7629, "no_votes": 6284, "total_votes": 13913, "percent_yes": 54.83361, "percent_no": 45.16639, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.001741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.150933", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve quality education, protect schools from state budget cuts and provide stable funding that cannot be taken by the state to preserve reading, math and science instruction; maintain hands-on science programs, classes and labs, maintain reading and language programs for all students; and attract and retain qualified teachers, shall Auburn Union School District levy $59 per parcel annually for 5 years with an exemption for seniors, independent oversight and no money for adminsitrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6452, "fingerprint": "2010|201000432|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000432|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "9e9d2576a06cb679", "measure_id": "201000432", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities, increase safety and improve energy efficiency in our schools and qualify for State matching grants, shall Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District issue $5 million in bonds, providing for a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, interest rates within legal limits, and no money for administrators' salaries or school operating expenses, in order to renovate existing school buildings, update utilities, science laboratories, windows, and furniture, with all money raised benefiting our local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56, "no_votes": 159, "total_votes": 215, "percent_yes": 26.046512, "percent_no": 73.953488, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.002297", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.151324", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities, increase safety and improve energy efficiency in our schools and qualify for State matching grants, shall Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District issue $5 million in bonds, providing for a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, interest rates within legal limits, and no money for administrators' salaries or school operating expenses, in order to renovate existing school buildings, update utilities, science laboratories, windows, and furniture, with all money raised benefiting our local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11494, "fingerprint": "2010|201000305|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000305|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "519ec2c58231eb62", "measure_id": "201000305", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall JIM POTTS be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5650, "no_votes": 1108, "total_votes": 6758, "percent_yes": 83.604616, "percent_no": 16.395384000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.170680", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.010423", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.156963", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall JIM POTTS be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6453, "fingerprint": "2010|201000005|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000005|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2a0a89b2ae226f32", "measure_id": "201000005", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Thomas Buckley be recalled (removed) from the office of the City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1010, "no_votes": 1290, "total_votes": 2300, "percent_yes": 43.913043, "percent_no": 56.086957, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-02-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.002594", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.151519", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Thomas Buckley be recalled (removed) from the office of the City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6481, "fingerprint": "2010|201000306|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000306|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "400e0880813375c6", "measure_id": "201000306", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall JIM AYRES be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5777, "no_votes": 1087, "total_votes": 6864, "percent_yes": 84.163755, "percent_no": 15.836245000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.010742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.157148", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall JIM AYRES be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6482, "fingerprint": "2010|201000307|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000307|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3a0da05c71eebb6d", "measure_id": "201000307", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall JOHN MANSPERGER be recalled (removed) from the office City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5618, "no_votes": 1203, "total_votes": 6821, "percent_yes": 82.36329, "percent_no": 17.636709999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.011033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.157329", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall JOHN MANSPERGER be recalled (removed) from the office City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6483, "fingerprint": "2010|201000308|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000308|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "28ad4678a4b93abb", "measure_id": "201000308", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall DALE STUBBLEFIELD be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5536, "no_votes": 1282, "total_votes": 6818, "percent_yes": 81.19682999999999, "percent_no": 18.80317000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.011297", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.157510", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall DALE STUBBLEFIELD be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6457, "fingerprint": "2010|201000066|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000066|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cbce29b6944bc003", "measure_id": "201000066", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on January 21, 2010, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order, including detachment from the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order designated as LAFCO No. 2008-18-2 (Resolution No. 01-10) be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2955, "no_votes": 1538, "total_votes": 4493, "percent_yes": 65.768975, "percent_no": 34.231025, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.003743", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.152278", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on January 21, 2010, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order, including detachment from the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order designated as LAFCO No. 2008-18-2 (Resolution No. 01-10) be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6468, "fingerprint": "2010|201000292|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000292|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "0db9507086888fcb", "measure_id": "201000292", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Commencing with the 2012 General Municipal Election, shall four (4) members of the City Council of the City of Menifee be elected by four (4) districts as described in this ballot measure and the Mayor of the City of Menifee be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14361, "no_votes": 5175, "total_votes": 19536, "percent_yes": 73.51044399999999, "percent_no": 26.489556000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.006835", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.154369", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Commencing with the 2012 General Municipal Election, shall four (4) members of the City Council of the City of Menifee be elected by four (4) districts as described in this ballot measure and the Mayor of the City of Menifee be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6458, "fingerprint": "2010|201000067|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000067|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "72bbb2ab0a7ef1b5", "measure_id": "201000067", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Future City Council be elected by district, from district, or at large? Yes vote = at large/ No vote = by district + from district.  (By district= 1,154, From district= 779)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2324, "no_votes": 1933, "total_votes": 4257, "percent_yes": 54.59243, "percent_no": 45.40757, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.004110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.152465", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Future City Council be elected by district, from district, or at large? Yes vote = at large/ No vote = by district + from district.  (By district= 1,154, From district= 779)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6469, "fingerprint": "2010|201000293|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000293|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "642fa7de01cec8f2", "measure_id": "201000293", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The term of office of any elected Mayor shall be (vote for only one): Four (4) Years _____ ? Two (2) Years _____ ? Yes vote = 4 years/No vote = 2 years", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8739, "no_votes": 11329, "total_votes": 20068, "percent_yes": 43.546942, "percent_no": 56.453058, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.007101", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.154561", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The term of office of any elected Mayor shall be (vote for only one): Four (4) Years _____ ? Two (2) Years _____ ? Yes vote = 4 years/No vote = 2 years", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6477, "fingerprint": "2010|201000301|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000301|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ad5cbeb22f1b7e47", "measure_id": "201000301", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting elected officials of the City of Murrieta and any of its political subdivisions from serving more than two consecutive four-year terms in office, with terms considered consecutive if they are at least four years apart, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16660, "no_votes": 8132, "total_votes": 24792, "percent_yes": 67.1991, "percent_no": 32.8009, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.009355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.156236", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting elected officials of the City of Murrieta and any of its political subdivisions from serving more than two consecutive four-year terms in office, with terms considered consecutive if they are at least four years apart, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6470, "fingerprint": "2010|201000294|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000294|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "207e46d2b17d24b4", "measure_id": "201000294", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The salary per year of any elected Mayor shall be (vote for only one): $8,000 per year _____ ? $10,000 per year _____ ? Yes vote = $8k/No vote = $10k", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11072, "no_votes": 8701, "total_votes": 19773, "percent_yes": 55.99555000000001, "percent_no": 44.00444999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.007398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.154749", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The salary per year of any elected Mayor shall be (vote for only one): $8,000 per year _____ ? $10,000 per year _____ ? Yes vote = $8k/No vote = $10k", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6478, "fingerprint": "2010|201000302|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000302|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "9c165bc57441d4f4", "measure_id": "201000302", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance placing limits on City Council compensation to 15% of the City's annual median family/household income (exclusive of any amounts payable as reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their official City duties); prohibiting City Council members from receiving any other personal benefits, including club memberships, medical and life insurance and pensions; and requiring that any increase be approved by 55% of the registered voters be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17111, "no_votes": 7520, "total_votes": 24631, "percent_yes": 69.46937, "percent_no": 30.530630000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.009625", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.156416", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance placing limits on City Council compensation to 15% of the City's annual median family/household income (exclusive of any amounts payable as reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their official City duties); prohibiting City Council members from receiving any other personal benefits, including club memberships, medical and life insurance and pensions; and requiring that any increase be approved by 55% of the registered voters be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6471, "fingerprint": "2010|201000295|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000295|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c69f90b34db7ead0", "measure_id": "201000295", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the members of the legislative body of the City of Menifee be elected at large?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14181, "no_votes": 5687, "total_votes": 19868, "percent_yes": 71.37608, "percent_no": 28.62392, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.007693", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.154941", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the members of the legislative body of the City of Menifee be elected at large?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6479, "fingerprint": "2010|201000303|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000303|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "82e342b5f433f541", "measure_id": "201000303", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting chief City administrative officials, including the City Manager and their direct reports (but excluding the police and other emergency public safety personnel), from having either annual salaries with benefits of a combined hourly rate with overtime and benefits (including, but not limited to, car, gas, life insurance, health/medical insurance, and other personal usage benefits) that exceeds 2.5 times the median family/household income in the City be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16401, "no_votes": 8175, "total_votes": 24576, "percent_yes": 66.73584, "percent_no": 33.264160000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.009889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.156600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting chief City administrative officials, including the City Manager and their direct reports (but excluding the police and other emergency public safety personnel), from having either annual salaries with benefits of a combined hourly rate with overtime and benefits (including, but not limited to, car, gas, life insurance, health/medical insurance, and other personal usage benefits) that exceeds 2.5 times the median family/household income in the City be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6456, "fingerprint": "2010|201000065|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000065|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "37a5a4fea984f138", "measure_id": "201000065", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent crime and shorten 9-1-1 response times by hiring additional police officers, firefighters, paramedics; upgrading emergency communications equipment; increasing gang and drug prevention programs; and expanding community policing, shall the City of Desert Hot Springs renew the existing annual public safety parcel tax rates for a period of 10 years, with independent citizens' review/annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1677, "no_votes": 354, "total_votes": 2031, "percent_yes": 82.57016499999999, "percent_no": 17.42983500000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.003450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.152088", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent crime and shorten 9-1-1 response times by hiring additional police officers, firefighters, paramedics; upgrading emergency communications equipment; increasing gang and drug prevention programs; and expanding community policing, shall the City of Desert Hot Springs renew the existing annual public safety parcel tax rates for a period of 10 years, with independent citizens' review/annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6454, "fingerprint": "2010|201000063|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000063|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "fa6f975fe03b6ade", "measure_id": "201000063", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset the impact of severe state budget cuts on essential services; address Cathedral City's Fiscal Emergency; prevent drastic cuts to police officers, firefighters, paramedics and ambulance response, 9-1-1 emergency dispatch, safety equipment for police officers and firefighters, anti-gang/anti-drug programs; and preserve other general City services, shall Cathedral City adopt a one cent transactions (sales) and use tax, expiring in five years, requiring citizens' finance advisory committee review and annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3180, "no_votes": 2361, "total_votes": 5541, "percent_yes": 57.39036, "percent_no": 42.60964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.002912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.151708", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset the impact of severe state budget cuts on essential services; address Cathedral City's Fiscal Emergency; prevent drastic cuts to police officers, firefighters, paramedics and ambulance response, 9-1-1 emergency dispatch, safety equipment for police officers and firefighters, anti-gang/anti-drug programs; and preserve other general City services, shall Cathedral City adopt a one cent transactions (sales) and use tax, expiring in five years, requiring citizens' finance advisory committee review and annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6455, "fingerprint": "2010|201000064|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000064|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ac346e68015eb9fc", "measure_id": "201000064", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve/maintain essential Coachella services such as police officers, firefighters; 911 response times; crime, gang and drug prevention programs; fixing potholes and streets; removing graffiti; sweeping streets; maintaining parks, soccer and sports fields; funding youth and senior services; and preserving other City services, shall Coachella establish a 5% utility users tax, exempting low-income seniors, with independent citizens oversight and annual financial audits, with all funds solely for Coachella?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 733, "no_votes": 520, "total_votes": 1253, "percent_yes": 58.4996, "percent_no": 41.5004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.003181", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.151898", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve/maintain essential Coachella services such as police officers, firefighters; 911 response times; crime, gang and drug prevention programs; fixing potholes and streets; removing graffiti; sweeping streets; maintaining parks, soccer and sports fields; funding youth and senior services; and preserving other City services, shall Coachella establish a 5% utility users tax, exempting low-income seniors, with independent citizens oversight and annual financial audits, with all funds solely for Coachella?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6459, "fingerprint": "2010|201000135|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000135|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "9e7856f820d01428", "measure_id": "201000135", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Southern Coachella Valley Commmunity Services District increase the annual special taxes of $66.00 per residential habitable unit to $85.00 ($19.00 annual increase) and $88.00 per commercial unit  to $110.00 ($22.00 annual increase) to fund supplemental law enforcement services such as those relating to agricultural crime, graffiti abatement, sobriety checkpoints, illegal dumping, and code enforcement, subject to an annual increase equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index, which increase shall not become effective for two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 174, "no_votes": 339, "total_votes": 513, "percent_yes": 33.918127, "percent_no": 66.081873, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-24", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.004381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.152662", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Southern Coachella Valley Commmunity Services District increase the annual special taxes of $66.00 per residential habitable unit to $85.00 ($19.00 annual increase) and $88.00 per commercial unit  to $110.00 ($22.00 annual increase) to fund supplemental law enforcement services such as those relating to agricultural crime, graffiti abatement, sobriety checkpoints, illegal dumping, and code enforcement, subject to an annual increase equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index, which increase shall not become effective for two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6460, "fingerprint": "2010|201000162|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000162|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4a05f2fcac8d1dc9", "measure_id": "201000162", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 10-002, amending RCTC'S existing 2002 voter-approved ordinance to expedite construction of the following transportation projects: Widen freeways including State Routes 91, 71, 79, and Interstates 10, 15, 215 - Widen and improve major streets - Expand Metrolink commuter train services by increasing bonded indebtedness from $500 to $975 million of estimated receipts from the Measure A program, without increasing taxes, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 275388, "no_votes": 164022, "total_votes": 439410, "percent_yes": 62.67222, "percent_no": 37.32778, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Bonds", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.004650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.152853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 10-002, amending RCTC'S existing 2002 voter-approved ordinance to expedite construction of the following transportation projects: Widen freeways including State Routes 91, 71, 79, and Interstates 10, 15, 215 - Widen and improve major streets - Expand Metrolink commuter train services by increasing bonded indebtedness from $500 to $975 million of estimated receipts from the Measure A program, without increasing taxes, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6461, "fingerprint": "2010|201000163|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000163|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e3d874efd16a1a30", "measure_id": "201000163", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the proposed Ordinance, requiring voter approval for increases or decreases in public safety employee retirement or pre-retirement death benefits and requiring that the County of Riverside continue the current CALPERS (California Public Employee Retirement System) retirement formula, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 230552, "no_votes": 206767, "total_votes": 437319, "percent_yes": 52.71941, "percent_no": 47.28059, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.004916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.153042", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed Ordinance, requiring voter approval for increases or decreases in public safety employee retirement or pre-retirement death benefits and requiring that the County of Riverside continue the current CALPERS (California Public Employee Retirement System) retirement formula, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6462, "fingerprint": "2010|201000164|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000164|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "02726979f019d48a", "measure_id": "201000164", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 899, requiring voter approval for increases in public safety employee retirement benefits or decreases in job related pre-retirement death benefits, and allowing decreases in retirement benefits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 261972, "no_votes": 168641, "total_votes": 430613, "percent_yes": 60.836995, "percent_no": 39.163005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.005182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.153231", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 899, requiring voter approval for increases in public safety employee retirement benefits or decreases in job related pre-retirement death benefits, and allowing decreases in retirement benefits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6474, "fingerprint": "2010|201000298|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000298|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "779841ef0d7a5970", "measure_id": "201000298", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you support changing to an elected Mayor rather than one appointed by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25122, "no_votes": 5991, "total_votes": 31113, "percent_yes": 80.744386, "percent_no": 19.255613999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.008505", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.155555", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you support changing to an elected Mayor rather than one appointed by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6475, "fingerprint": "2010|201000299|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000299|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "9a07d53cd7b81c05", "measure_id": "201000299", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Whether or not you support changing to an elected Mayor, should the City Council call a binding election for voters to decide the issue?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22791, "no_votes": 7732, "total_votes": 30523, "percent_yes": 74.66828, "percent_no": 25.331720000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.008769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.155866", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Whether or not you support changing to an elected Mayor, should the City Council call a binding election for voters to decide the issue?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6476, "fingerprint": "2010|201000300|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000300|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "80e5f94342bfe259", "measure_id": "201000300", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax assessed by the City for persons occupying hotel/motel rooms in the City of Moreno Valley be increased from eight percent (8%) to eleven percent (11%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9864, "no_votes": 21015, "total_votes": 30879, "percent_yes": 31.94404, "percent_no": 68.05596, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.009060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.156053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax assessed by the City for persons occupying hotel/motel rooms in the City of Moreno Valley be increased from eight percent (8%) to eleven percent (11%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6465, "fingerprint": "2010|201000289|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000289|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "968c0fdade097f2b", "measure_id": "201000289", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance Bill No. 2010-04 be adopted to provide that no person shall be eligible to serve in the office of City Council Member of the City after serving two (2) consecutive four-year terms, until after the next election date established by the Municipal Code for City Council Members (approximately two years) following his or her second term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1740, "no_votes": 454, "total_votes": 2194, "percent_yes": 79.3072, "percent_no": 20.692800000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.006038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.153800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance Bill No. 2010-04 be adopted to provide that no person shall be eligible to serve in the office of City Council Member of the City after serving two (2) consecutive four-year terms, until after the next election date established by the Municipal Code for City Council Members (approximately two years) following his or her second term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6484, "fingerprint": "2010|201000309|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000309|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cdc4c99b2913ea9e", "measure_id": "201000309", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the permanent annual appropriations limit of the City of Wildomar be set at $7,728,041?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4951, "no_votes": 2066, "total_votes": 7017, "percent_yes": 70.55722, "percent_no": 29.44278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.011566", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.157693", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the permanent annual appropriations limit of the City of Wildomar be set at $7,728,041?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6466, "fingerprint": "2010|201000290|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000290|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b274c562e6e5a326", "measure_id": "201000290", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset state budget cuts and limit cuts to police officers, firefighters, paramedic and ambulance response, pothole maintenance/street repairs, graffiti removal youth anti-gang/anti-drug programs, senior services, parks and other general City services, shall the existing City of Indio utility users' tax rate be increased three percent, exempting all seniors, requiring annual financial audits, citizens' oversight, with no money going to Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7097, "no_votes": 6167, "total_votes": 13264, "percent_yes": 53.50572999999999, "percent_no": 46.49427000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.006302", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.153988", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset state budget cuts and limit cuts to police officers, firefighters, paramedic and ambulance response, pothole maintenance/street repairs, graffiti removal youth anti-gang/anti-drug programs, senior services, parks and other general City services, shall the existing City of Indio utility users' tax rate be increased three percent, exempting all seniors, requiring annual financial audits, citizens' oversight, with no money going to Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6467, "fingerprint": "2010|201000291|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000291|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cadad9f5a64d31aa", "measure_id": "201000291", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a transient occupancy tax of twelve percent (12%) on hotels and campgrounds in the City of Lake Elsinore?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2911, "no_votes": 5132, "total_votes": 8043, "percent_yes": 36.192963, "percent_no": 63.807037, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.006569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.154181", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a transient occupancy tax of twelve percent (12%) on hotels and campgrounds in the City of Lake Elsinore?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6485, "fingerprint": "2010|201000433|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000433|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c62aaaa6fce66d6d", "measure_id": "201000433", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To create good local jobs; provide local job training for careers including paramedics, nursing assistants, law enforcement and criminal justice; and provide affordable local access to courses students need to transfer to universities, shall Mt. Jacinto Community College District build the first phase of a campus to serve the Beaumont and Banning area by issuing $47 million in bonds, at legal rates, with state matching funds, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10754, "no_votes": 9704, "total_votes": 20458, "percent_yes": 52.56623, "percent_no": 47.43377, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.011829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.157877", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To create good local jobs; provide local job training for careers including paramedics, nursing assistants, law enforcement and criminal justice; and provide affordable local access to courses students need to transfer to universities, shall Mt. Jacinto Community College District build the first phase of a campus to serve the Beaumont and Banning area by issuing $47 million in bonds, at legal rates, with state matching funds, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6480, "fingerprint": "2010|201000304|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000304|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "69dc2002bf7d812e", "measure_id": "201000304", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To offset State budget cuts, provide local funding the State cannot take, and supplement City funds for essential services such as 9-1-1 response, police and fire protection, youth/senior programs, tourism, and facilities such as the convention center, libraries, and parks, shall the City's existing transient occupancy tax, also known as a hotel tax paid only by hotel guests, be increased by 2%, subject to audit and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38827, "no_votes": 20021, "total_votes": 58848, "percent_yes": 65.978456, "percent_no": 34.021544000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.010157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.156782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset State budget cuts, provide local funding the State cannot take, and supplement City funds for essential services such as 9-1-1 response, police and fire protection, youth/senior programs, tourism, and facilities such as the convention center, libraries, and parks, shall the City's existing transient occupancy tax, also known as a hotel tax paid only by hotel guests, be increased by 2%, subject to audit and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6463, "fingerprint": "2010|201000287|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000287|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a70a0eafdd2fd7e4", "measure_id": "201000287", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a limit of three terms in office for Hemet Elected City Officials?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16133, "no_votes": 2020, "total_votes": 18153, "percent_yes": 88.87236, "percent_no": 11.12764, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.005476", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.153418", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a limit of three terms in office for Hemet Elected City Officials?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6464, "fingerprint": "2010|201000288|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000288|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "bef5a1eebef50311", "measure_id": "201000288", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Hemet be prohibited from contributing to the cost of health benefits made available to elected Hemet City Officials?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14486, "no_votes": 3443, "total_votes": 17929, "percent_yes": 80.79647399999999, "percent_no": 19.20352600000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.005770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.153611", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Hemet be prohibited from contributing to the cost of health benefits made available to elected Hemet City Officials?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6472, "fingerprint": "2010|201000296|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000296|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c051094440068f52", "measure_id": "201000296", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the permanent annual appropriations limit of the City of Menifee be set at $25,794,387?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13056, "no_votes": 5524, "total_votes": 18580, "percent_yes": 70.26911, "percent_no": 29.730890000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.007963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.155130", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the permanent annual appropriations limit of the City of Menifee be set at $25,794,387?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6473, "fingerprint": "2010|201000297|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000297|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "41f6c47bd346c55d", "measure_id": "201000297", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Any Councilmember who has served two successive terms or eight consecutive years shall be ineligible to serve again in that office until an intervening period of two years has elapsed. Any Councilmember who serves for two or more years of an appointed or elected term shall be considered to have served a term. Terms completed prior to this measure taking effect shall not be counted in determining eligibility.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16171, "no_votes": 3698, "total_votes": 19869, "percent_yes": 81.38809, "percent_no": 18.611909999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.008239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.155318", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Any Councilmember who has served two successive terms or eight consecutive years shall be ineligible to serve again in that office until an intervening period of two years has elapsed. Any Councilmember who serves for two or more years of an appointed or elected term shall be considered to have served a term. Terms completed prior to this measure taking effect shall not be counted in determining eligibility.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6486, "fingerprint": "2010|201000115|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000115|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "f0492d9862698128", "measure_id": "201000115", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities, including continuing to upgrade student access to computers and modern technology, renovating the library to expand educational opportunities for our children, and making renewable energy improvements to reduce energy costs and put more money into the classroom, shall the Arcohe School District be authorized to issue $3,900,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries or overhead?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 377, "no_votes": 933, "total_votes": 1310, "percent_yes": 28.778625, "percent_no": 71.221375, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.012127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.158063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities, including continuing to upgrade student access to computers and modern technology, renovating the library to expand educational opportunities for our children, and making renewable energy improvements to reduce energy costs and put more money into the classroom, shall the Arcohe School District be authorized to issue $3,900,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries or overhead?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6496, "fingerprint": "2010|201000319|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000319|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "d097aa6622d1cb71", "measure_id": "201000319", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance repealing increases in monthly water, sewer, and garbage collection/solid waste disposal service rates approved by the Sacramento City Council in June 2009, setting these monthly utility service rates at the amounts in effect on February 10, 2010, and allowing the City Council to increase these rates without voter approval beginning July 2012 only if the rates are not increased above the annual increase in a specified consumer price index, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35674, "no_votes": 79446, "total_votes": 115120, "percent_yes": 30.988532000000003, "percent_no": 69.011468, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.015631", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.159889", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance repealing increases in monthly water, sewer, and garbage collection/solid waste disposal service rates approved by the Sacramento City Council in June 2009, setting these monthly utility service rates at the amounts in effect on February 10, 2010, and allowing the City Council to increase these rates without voter approval beginning July 2012 only if the rates are not increased above the annual increase in a specified consumer price index, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6497, "fingerprint": "2010|201000320|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000320|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "c4ee3f5435aa6c09", "measure_id": "201000320", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve essential services like fire, police, and 911 emergency response, shall City of Sacramento's business operations tax be updated by taxing businesses engaged in medical marijuana transactions, and in commercial production and sale of marijuana if legalized by California voters, at maximum rates of 4% and 10%, respectively, of gross receipts, with City Council discretion to lower tax rates or raise tax rates to the maximums, and requiring independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83986, "no_votes": 33079, "total_votes": 117065, "percent_yes": 71.74305, "percent_no": 28.256950000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.016075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.160071", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve essential services like fire, police, and 911 emergency response, shall City of Sacramento's business operations tax be updated by taxing businesses engaged in medical marijuana transactions, and in commercial production and sale of marijuana if legalized by California voters, at maximum rates of 4% and 10%, respectively, of gross receipts, with City Council discretion to lower tax rates or raise tax rates to the maximums, and requiring independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6487, "fingerprint": "2010|201000310|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000310|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "cf1efd56685c5e09", "measure_id": "201000310", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted June 25, 2010, by Sacramento County LAFCo, ordering the incorporation of the territory described and designated as \"City of Arden Arcade\" be confirmed subject to terms and conditions specified in the order, including payments to Sacramento County commencing FY 2012-2013 and terminating after $219,000,000 is paid, and for the City to levy and collect the same taxes, fees, charges, assessments and rates currently imposed by Sacramento County, as particularly described in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6927, "no_votes": 21266, "total_votes": 28193, "percent_yes": 24.569929, "percent_no": 75.430071, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.012444", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.158249", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted June 25, 2010, by Sacramento County LAFCo, ordering the incorporation of the territory described and designated as \"City of Arden Arcade\" be confirmed subject to terms and conditions specified in the order, including payments to Sacramento County commencing FY 2012-2013 and terminating after $219,000,000 is paid, and for the City to levy and collect the same taxes, fees, charges, assessments and rates currently imposed by Sacramento County, as particularly described in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6493, "fingerprint": "2010|201000316|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000316|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "5da8e5916f05b025", "measure_id": "201000316", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the City of Rancho Cordova's existing 2.5% utility users tax on telecommunication and video services; modernize the ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used; to preserve funding for general municipal services such as neighborhood improvements and safety including, but not limited to, police services, maintenance of and improvements to city streets, sidewalks, landscaping and graffiti removal?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8630, "no_votes": 7068, "total_votes": 15698, "percent_yes": 54.97516, "percent_no": 45.02484, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.014096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.159345", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the City of Rancho Cordova's existing 2.5% utility users tax on telecommunication and video services; modernize the ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used; to preserve funding for general municipal services such as neighborhood improvements and safety including, but not limited to, police services, maintenance of and improvements to city streets, sidewalks, landscaping and graffiti removal?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6494, "fingerprint": "2010|201000317|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000317|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "5a7a6982376326ae", "measure_id": "201000317", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring cannabis businesses to pay a tax to fund general municipal services, including police and code enforcement, ranging from $120 to $150 for each $1000 of gross recipts, or $100 for each square foot for non-profits. The tax would only be effective if Proposition 19 passes, or if any other law allowing cannabis businesses is adopted, and it would only be imposed if the City allows cannabis businesses.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10865, "no_votes": 5061, "total_votes": 15926, "percent_yes": 68.22178, "percent_no": 31.778220000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.014522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.159526", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring cannabis businesses to pay a tax to fund general municipal services, including police and code enforcement, ranging from $120 to $150 for each $1000 of gross recipts, or $100 for each square foot for non-profits. The tax would only be effective if Proposition 19 passes, or if any other law allowing cannabis businesses is adopted, and it would only be imposed if the City allows cannabis businesses.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6488, "fingerprint": "2010|201000311|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000311|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "f7455ba3e11d33a7", "measure_id": "201000311", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the existing Utility User Tax from 2.5% to 2.25%; modernize the current ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used for telecommunications and video services; to preserve funding for essential general municpial services, such as public safety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31093, "no_votes": 9514, "total_votes": 40607, "percent_yes": 76.57054, "percent_no": 23.429460000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.012724", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.158431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the existing Utility User Tax from 2.5% to 2.25%; modernize the current ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used for telecommunications and video services; to preserve funding for essential general municpial services, such as public safety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6489, "fingerprint": "2010|201000312|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000312|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "b814e8157a82346e", "measure_id": "201000312", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city council members? A \"Yes\" vote means the citizens directly elect the mayor; a \"No\" vote continues the practice that the council chooses on of its members to preside as Mayor on an annual basis?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32500, "no_votes": 9030, "total_votes": 41530, "percent_yes": 78.256685, "percent_no": 21.743314999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.013011", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.158616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city council members? A \"Yes\" vote means the citizens directly elect the mayor; a \"No\" vote continues the practice that the council chooses on of its members to preside as Mayor on an annual basis?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6490, "fingerprint": "2010|201000313|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000313|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "51bc78433c3b3a90", "measure_id": "201000313", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26170, "no_votes": 14928, "total_votes": 41098, "percent_yes": 63.677067, "percent_no": 36.322933, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.013278", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.158797", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6491, "fingerprint": "2010|201000314|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000314|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "201000314", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14194, "no_votes": 26142, "total_votes": 40336, "percent_yes": 35.189408, "percent_no": 64.810592, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.013543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.158982", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6492, "fingerprint": "2010|201000315|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000315|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "ac1482cf5af12c77", "measure_id": "201000315", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Elk Grove be qualified by and elected from six (6) districts and the Mayor be qualified and elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire city; a \"yes\" vote increases the legislative body to seven (7) members; a \"No\" vote retains the current size of the legislative body at five (5) members.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16833, "no_votes": 22727, "total_votes": 39560, "percent_yes": 42.550555, "percent_no": 57.449445, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.013804", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.159166", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Elk Grove be qualified by and elected from six (6) districts and the Mayor be qualified and elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire city; a \"yes\" vote increases the legislative body to seven (7) members; a \"No\" vote retains the current size of the legislative body at five (5) members.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6495, "fingerprint": "2010|201000318|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000318|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "f704fee221656ec4", "measure_id": "201000318", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring individuals cultivating cannabis (marijuana) for personal use to pay a tax to fund general municipal services, including public safety and code enforcement, in an amount not to exceed the following: 1) for indoor cultivation, from $600 to $900 per year for each square foot of area cultivated; and 2) for outdoor cultivation, from $600 to $900 per year for each 12.5 square feet of area cultivated.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8777, "no_votes": 6941, "total_votes": 15718, "percent_yes": 55.84044, "percent_no": 44.15956, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.015151", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.159706", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring individuals cultivating cannabis (marijuana) for personal use to pay a tax to fund general municipal services, including public safety and code enforcement, in an amount not to exceed the following: 1) for indoor cultivation, from $600 to $900 per year for each square foot of area cultivated; and 2) for outdoor cultivation, from $600 to $900 per year for each 12.5 square feet of area cultivated.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6499, "fingerprint": "2010|201000435|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000435|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "9de92ca7016ab464", "measure_id": "201000435", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace inadequate electrical and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; upgrade computers and technology; improve energy efficiency; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District issue $16,100,000 of existing bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent ctizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 1, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.017075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.160438", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; replace inadequate electrical and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; upgrade computers and technology; improve energy efficiency; and make health and safety improvements; shall the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District issue $16,100,000 of existing bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent ctizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6498, "fingerprint": "2010|201000434|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000434|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "1446070dc2103a01", "measure_id": "201000434", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of public education, attract qualified teachers, provide up-to-date science labs/classrooms/technology without increasing current tax rates, shall Aromas San Juan Unified School District equip classrooms with effective heating and cooling systems, upgrade aging plumbing, lighting/electrical systems, renovate restrooms, cafetreria, pay off facilities loans, repair, construct schoool facilities/acquire equipment, by issuing $9,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen overisght, no administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1214, "no_votes": 776, "total_votes": 1990, "percent_yes": 61.005026, "percent_no": 38.994974, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.016589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.160252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of public education, attract qualified teachers, provide up-to-date science labs/classrooms/technology without increasing current tax rates, shall Aromas San Juan Unified School District equip classrooms with effective heating and cooling systems, upgrade aging plumbing, lighting/electrical systems, renovate restrooms, cafetreria, pay off facilities loans, repair, construct schoool facilities/acquire equipment, by issuing $9,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen overisght, no administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6510, "fingerprint": "2010|201000326|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000326|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "fe365375217e6add", "measure_id": "201000326", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent further cuts and preserve funding for essential City services, including police, fire, and emergency response; paving, maintaining and repairing City streets; reducing crime and criminal gang/drug activity; trimming trees and keeping public areas well-maintained; shall the City of Redlands establish a 1/2 cent transactions and use (sales) tax automatically expiring in ten years, with independent oversight, annual audits, and all funds dedicated entirely to local priorities and Redlands City services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10041, "no_votes": 11732, "total_votes": 21773, "percent_yes": 46.11675, "percent_no": 53.88325, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.022336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.162578", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent further cuts and preserve funding for essential City services, including police, fire, and emergency response; paving, maintaining and repairing City streets; reducing crime and criminal gang/drug activity; trimming trees and keeping public areas well-maintained; shall the City of Redlands establish a 1/2 cent transactions and use (sales) tax automatically expiring in ten years, with independent oversight, annual audits, and all funds dedicated entirely to local priorities and Redlands City services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6511, "fingerprint": "2010|201000327|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000327|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ebeac774e983c015", "measure_id": "201000327", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the Redlands City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8052, "no_votes": 12856, "total_votes": 20908, "percent_yes": 38.511574, "percent_no": 61.488426, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.022770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.162764", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the Redlands City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6512, "fingerprint": "2010|201000328|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000328|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "98f1e3e586cebe7b", "measure_id": "201000328", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of San Bernardino be amended to (1) make the City Attorney, City Clerk and City Treasurer appointed, rather than elected positions; (2) allow for greater flexiblity in the employment of additional legal services; and (3) add professional qualification requirements for the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11333, "no_votes": 19409, "total_votes": 30742, "percent_yes": 36.864877, "percent_no": 63.135123, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.023236", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.162950", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of San Bernardino be amended to (1) make the City Attorney, City Clerk and City Treasurer appointed, rather than elected positions; (2) allow for greater flexiblity in the employment of additional legal services; and (3) add professional qualification requirements for the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6513, "fingerprint": "2010|201000436|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000436|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "32b7849621649a94", "measure_id": "201000436", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade and modernize classrooms and restrooms; make health and safety improvements; upgrade electrical systems, computers, and technology; replace outdated windows with new energy efficient windows; upgrade heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; and install solar panels, shall the Baker Valley Unified School District issue $3,200,000 of bonds within legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41, "no_votes": 61, "total_votes": 102, "percent_yes": 40.19608, "percent_no": 59.80392, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.023707", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.163133", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade and modernize classrooms and restrooms; make health and safety improvements; upgrade electrical systems, computers, and technology; replace outdated windows with new energy efficient windows; upgrade heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; and install solar panels, shall the Baker Valley Unified School District issue $3,200,000 of bonds within legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have no money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6502, "fingerprint": "2010|201000070|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000070|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a8ac7c75bbbdf986", "measure_id": "201000070", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Ordinance of the People of Redlands Adding Chapter 18.275 to the Redlands Municipal Code to prohibit the Approval of \"Mega-Retail Development\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6937, "no_votes": 8587, "total_votes": 15524, "percent_yes": 44.685647, "percent_no": 55.314353, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.018562", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.161076", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Ordinance of the People of Redlands Adding Chapter 18.275 to the Redlands Municipal Code to prohibit the Approval of \"Mega-Retail Development\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6500, "fingerprint": "2010|201000068|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000068|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "9a73c012d353c94c", "measure_id": "201000068", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Section 910 be amended to read as follows \"The City Hospital may be sold pursuant to relevant provisions of the California Government Code.\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 627, "no_votes": 197, "total_votes": 824, "percent_yes": 76.09223, "percent_no": 23.90777, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.017559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.160621", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Section 910 be amended to read as follows \"The City Hospital may be sold pursuant to relevant provisions of the California Government Code.\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6501, "fingerprint": "2010|201000069|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000069|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "fe6c80284e23dc49", "measure_id": "201000069", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to mandate the Board of Hospital Trustees and the Needles City Council to sell the Colorado River Medical Center Pursuant to Government Code Section 37615.1(o) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 451, "no_votes": 368, "total_votes": 819, "percent_yes": 55.06716, "percent_no": 44.93284, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.018068", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.160889", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to mandate the Board of Hospital Trustees and the Needles City Council to sell the Colorado River Medical Center Pursuant to Government Code Section 37615.1(o) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6503, "fingerprint": "2010|201000071|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000071|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "23a611033c3417a7", "measure_id": "201000071", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Rialto City Council restore the rate of the special tax imposed in 1958 to fund the entire required City contribution to the statewide PERS retirement system for its employees previously approved by the City voters, from the current zero amount to an amount that will fund only a portion of such contribution, but which is the maximum amount of such tax now permitted by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1560, "no_votes": 4433, "total_votes": 5993, "percent_yes": 26.030368, "percent_no": 73.969632, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.019050", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.161260", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Rialto City Council restore the rate of the special tax imposed in 1958 to fund the entire required City contribution to the statewide PERS retirement system for its employees previously approved by the City voters, from the current zero amount to an amount that will fund only a portion of such contribution, but which is the maximum amount of such tax now permitted by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6504, "fingerprint": "2010|201000116|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000116|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "829b6d2ddc71bde3", "measure_id": "201000116", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue improving the quality of education in local schools, by refunding certificates of participation, which financed school facilities and equipment, shall the Lucerne Valley Unified School District issue $7,950,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and audits, and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 472, "no_votes": 920, "total_votes": 1392, "percent_yes": 33.908045, "percent_no": 66.091955, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.019585", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.161443", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue improving the quality of education in local schools, by refunding certificates of participation, which financed school facilities and equipment, shall the Lucerne Valley Unified School District issue $7,950,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and audits, and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6505, "fingerprint": "2010|201000321|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000321|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "0b4788895e0a9ccf", "measure_id": "201000321", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Adelanto approve an amendment to The Charter of the City of Adelanto, Sections 400, 402 (City powers); 501, 502, 505 (elected officers); 601, 602, 605 (vacancy and compensation of elected officers); 606 (ordinances); 607 (contracts); 608, 609, 611 (franchises, indemnification and interference with administration); 703, 704, 705, 706 (city attorney); 708 (treasurer); 901, 902, 908 (budget); 1000 (effect of Charter on school districts); 1103, 1104, 1105, 1106 (commissions and boards)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1243, "no_votes": 1541, "total_votes": 2784, "percent_yes": 44.64799, "percent_no": 55.35201, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.020079", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.161655", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Adelanto approve an amendment to The Charter of the City of Adelanto, Sections 400, 402 (City powers); 501, 502, 505 (elected officers); 601, 602, 605 (vacancy and compensation of elected officers); 606 (ordinances); 607 (contracts); 608, 609, 611 (franchises, indemnification and interference with administration); 703, 704, 705, 706 (city attorney); 708 (treasurer); 901, 902, 908 (budget); 1000 (effect of Charter on school districts); 1103, 1104, 1105, 1106 (commissions and boards)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6509, "fingerprint": "2010|201000325|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000325|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "60f4e41f6c0eff2a", "measure_id": "201000325", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the Ontario Municipal Code to increase the rate for the City's transient occupancy tax by 1% to a total of 12 3/4% of the rent charged by the hotel operators, including online travel companies, for the transient occupancy of any hotel room, or portion of a hotel room, in the City be adopted to help the City preserve general City services such as police and fire protection?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12198, "no_votes": 13180, "total_votes": 25378, "percent_yes": 48.065254, "percent_no": 51.934746, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.021896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.162393", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the Ontario Municipal Code to increase the rate for the City's transient occupancy tax by 1% to a total of 12 3/4% of the rent charged by the hotel operators, including online travel companies, for the transient occupancy of any hotel room, or portion of a hotel room, in the City be adopted to help the City preserve general City services such as police and fire protection?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6506, "fingerprint": "2010|201000322|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000322|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4b20dad5e596dad2", "measure_id": "201000322", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 806 of the Charter of the City of Big Bear Lake be amended to make any elector of the area served by the Department of Water and Power eligible for appointment to the Board of Water and Power Commissioners, and prohibit City employees and commissioners and elected or appointed board members of any governmental agency having jurisidiction over any area served by the Department from becoming or remaining members of the Board?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1339, "no_votes": 505, "total_votes": 1844, "percent_yes": 72.613883, "percent_no": 27.386117, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.020521", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.161838", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 806 of the Charter of the City of Big Bear Lake be amended to make any elector of the area served by the Department of Water and Power eligible for appointment to the Board of Water and Power Commissioners, and prohibit City employees and commissioners and elected or appointed board members of any governmental agency having jurisidiction over any area served by the Department from becoming or remaining members of the Board?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6507, "fingerprint": "2010|201000323|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000323|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "516ff0b074439374", "measure_id": "201000323", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to prohibit the possession, sale, use, display or discharge of all fireworks within the City limits of Fontana be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9803, "no_votes": 20174, "total_votes": 29977, "percent_yes": 32.701736999999994, "percent_no": 67.298263, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.020953", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.162022", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to prohibit the possession, sale, use, display or discharge of all fireworks within the City limits of Fontana be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6514, "fingerprint": "2010|201000437|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000437|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4db8987b4924c97b", "measure_id": "201000437", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Rialto Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct and improve classrooms and support facilities, provide career and technical classrooms, including science labs, to enhance preparation for college and careers, replace portable facilities with permanent classrooms, and increase student access to modern technology, by issuing $98,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual financial and performance audits, and no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12608, "no_votes": 5529, "total_votes": 18137, "percent_yes": 69.515353, "percent_no": 30.484646999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.024153", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.163319", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Rialto Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct and improve classrooms and support facilities, provide career and technical classrooms, including science labs, to enhance preparation for college and careers, replace portable facilities with permanent classrooms, and increase student access to modern technology, by issuing $98,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual financial and performance audits, and no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6508, "fingerprint": "2010|201000324|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000324|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "cf1d4056e28087e3", "measure_id": "201000324", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance to prohibit the possession, sale, use, display or discharge of fireworks within the City of Grand Terrace be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1158, "no_votes": 2594, "total_votes": 3752, "percent_yes": 30.863538, "percent_no": 69.136462, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.021431", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.162207", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance to prohibit the possession, sale, use, display or discharge of fireworks within the City of Grand Terrace be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6521, "fingerprint": "2010|201000076|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000076|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6fc6c686d1d7f83f", "measure_id": "201000076", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Betty Rexford be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of the City Council of the City of Poway?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9408, "no_votes": 2656, "total_votes": 12064, "percent_yes": 77.98408, "percent_no": 22.015919999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.026727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.164593", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Betty Rexford be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of the City Council of the City of Poway?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11495, "fingerprint": "2010|201000165|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000165|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "50c8ac542002c65e", "measure_id": "201000165", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Can Diego County Charter be amended to prohibit the County from requiring the use of project labor agreements on County construction projects except where required by State or federal law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 614744, "no_votes": 196315, "total_votes": 811059, "percent_yes": 75.79523, "percent_no": 24.204769999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.179140", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.027862", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.165319", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Can Diego County Charter be amended to prohibit the County from requiring the use of project labor agreements on County construction projects except where required by State or federal law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6515, "fingerprint": "2010|201000038|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000038|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4f1d8600dd1fc691", "measure_id": "201000038", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall this initiative be adopted for the purpose of siting a new recycling center and class III solid waste landfill on the East Otay Mesa area of unincorporated San Diego County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 399127, "no_votes": 73293, "total_votes": 472420, "percent_yes": 84.485626, "percent_no": 15.514374000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.024613", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.163504", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall this initiative be adopted for the purpose of siting a new recycling center and class III solid waste landfill on the East Otay Mesa area of unincorporated San Diego County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11498, "fingerprint": "2010|201000331|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000331|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "cb56b572ce65ca8a", "measure_id": "201000331", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to establish a good cause requirement for the termination or suspension of Deputy City Attorneys who have served continuously for two years or more, except that any Deputy City Attorney may be subject to layoff due to lack of work or insufficient appropriations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 238803, "no_votes": 91671, "total_votes": 330474, "percent_yes": 72.260755, "percent_no": 27.739244999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.179704", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.028719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.165870", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to establish a good cause requirement for the termination or suspension of Deputy City Attorneys who have served continuously for two years or more, except that any Deputy City Attorney may be subject to layoff due to lack of work or insufficient appropriations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6516, "fingerprint": "2010|201000039|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000039|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4bac4b26987f5de7", "measure_id": "201000039", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the San Diego County Charter be amended to impose a limit of two terms for persons serving on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 336416, "no_votes": 156374, "total_votes": 492790, "percent_yes": 68.26762, "percent_no": 31.732380000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.025121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.163685", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Diego County Charter be amended to impose a limit of two terms for persons serving on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11499, "fingerprint": "2010|201000332|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000332|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3ec97916da81b181", "measure_id": "201000332", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition M be amended, allowing completion of parks, library, trails, recreation and transportation facilities for Pacific Highlands Ranch by removing a development timing restriction based on completion of the SR-56/I-5 Interchange, only after City Council approves a program of phased development ensuring facilities are constructed before or concurrent with new development, paid for by developers at no cost to taxpayers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 228775, "no_votes": 94866, "total_votes": 323641, "percent_yes": 70.68789, "percent_no": 29.312110000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.179889", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.028985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.166051", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition M be amended, allowing completion of parks, library, trails, recreation and transportation facilities for Pacific Highlands Ranch by removing a development timing restriction based on completion of the SR-56/I-5 Interchange, only after City Council approves a program of phased development ensuring facilities are constructed before or concurrent with new development, paid for by developers at no cost to taxpayers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6522, "fingerprint": "2010|201000077|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000077|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "551d8e7bb71c72ef", "measure_id": "201000077", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to extend eligibility for veterans' preference points in any original Civil Service examination to veterans who have served in the United States Armed Forces during any war, major militaryaction or peacekeeping mission, and to provide an additional five percent credit for any veteran or the spouse of any veteran who has a qualifying service-related disability?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 146141, "no_votes": 48263, "total_votes": 194404, "percent_yes": 75.173867, "percent_no": 24.826133, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.026994", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.164772", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to extend eligibility for veterans' preference points in any original Civil Service examination to veterans who have served in the United States Armed Forces during any war, major militaryaction or peacekeeping mission, and to provide an additional five percent credit for any veteran or the spouse of any veteran who has a qualifying service-related disability?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11500, "fingerprint": "2010|201000333|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000333|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "86549e95d0a885f8", "measure_id": "201000333", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help offset severe state cuts and help restore essential services, including police, fire and street resurfacing, shall the City of San Diego enact a temporary one-half cent sales tax for up to five years, only if the independent City Auditor certifies conditions have been met, including pension reforms and managed competition?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 137010, "no_votes": 222166, "total_votes": 359176, "percent_yes": 38.145643, "percent_no": 61.854357, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.180076", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.029350", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.166234", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help offset severe state cuts and help restore essential services, including police, fire and street resurfacing, shall the City of San Diego enact a temporary one-half cent sales tax for up to five years, only if the independent City Auditor certifies conditions have been met, including pension reforms and managed competition?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6523, "fingerprint": "2010|201000078|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000078|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3c5da5d8a736e0eb", "measure_id": "201000078", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be revised to make permanent the Strong Mayor form of governance; add a ninth Council seat; and, when the ninth seat is filled, increase the Council votes required to override a mayoral veto to a two-thirds vote?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120107, "no_votes": 78897, "total_votes": 199004, "percent_yes": 60.354066, "percent_no": 39.645934, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.027298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.164952", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be revised to make permanent the Strong Mayor form of governance; add a ninth Council seat; and, when the ninth seat is filled, increase the Council votes required to override a mayoral veto to a two-thirds vote?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11496, "fingerprint": "2010|201000329|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000329|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "0e8d2683f3f589bb", "measure_id": "201000329", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of Carlsbad, California be amended to add Section 502 Retention of Benefits limiting increases in safety retirement benefits without an amendment to this section?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23998, "no_votes": 13335, "total_votes": 37333, "percent_yes": 64.28093299999999, "percent_no": 35.71906700000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.179326", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.028164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.165500", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of Carlsbad, California be amended to add Section 502 Retention of Benefits limiting increases in safety retirement benefits without an amendment to this section?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6517, "fingerprint": "2010|201000072|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000072|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "90b01392ee79b6d3", "measure_id": "201000072", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the City from funding or entering into public works contracts that require agreements with labor organizations or payments on behalf of employees to labor organization benefit plans or other trust funds be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18783, "no_votes": 14906, "total_votes": 33689, "percent_yes": 55.7541, "percent_no": 44.2459, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.025517", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.163865", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the City from funding or entering into public works contracts that require agreements with labor organizations or payments on behalf of employees to labor organization benefit plans or other trust funds be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11497, "fingerprint": "2010|201000330|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000330|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6e92d08bfb3845d9", "measure_id": "201000330", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to modernize the City's 1978 Telephone Users' Tax (renamed the Telecommunications Users' Tax), with no rate increase; maintain exemptions for low income senior citizens; ensure Tax proceeds continue to be available for general municipal purposes, including police, fire, streets, libraries, and parks; revise the method for calculating and collecting theTax to reflect technological and legal changes; and amend the tax base to equitable include all applicable telecommucications services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23303, "no_votes": 30003, "total_votes": 53306, "percent_yes": 43.71553, "percent_no": 56.28447, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.179517", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.028435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.165687", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to modernize the City's 1978 Telephone Users' Tax (renamed the Telecommunications Users' Tax), with no rate increase; maintain exemptions for low income senior citizens; ensure Tax proceeds continue to be available for general municipal purposes, including police, fire, streets, libraries, and parks; revise the method for calculating and collecting theTax to reflect technological and legal changes; and amend the tax base to equitable include all applicable telecommucications services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6518, "fingerprint": "2010|201000073|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000073|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e331fac4d13576e3", "measure_id": "201000073", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you support the City continuing to use and seek federal, state, and local funding to complete the study of long-term traffic relief options, including a tunnel, between the Coronado Bridge and Naval Air Station North Island?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1704, "no_votes": 3458, "total_votes": 5162, "percent_yes": 33.010462000000004, "percent_no": 66.989538, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.025847", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.164049", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you support the City continuing to use and seek federal, state, and local funding to complete the study of long-term traffic relief options, including a tunnel, between the Coronado Bridge and Naval Air Station North Island?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11502, "fingerprint": "2010|201000441|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000441|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e4ca09a1161c8259", "measure_id": "201000441", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent Math, Science and English teacher layoffs, protect neighborhood schools from state budget cuts, prevent cuts to essential academic programs, job/college preparation, and preserve small classes, shall San Diego Unified School District levy a Temporary 5 Year Emergency annual tax that Sacramento can not take away of $98/single family home, and taxes on other types of parcels, exempting low income  seniors, with independent audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 133785, "no_votes": 129737, "total_votes": 263522, "percent_yes": 50.768060000000006, "percent_no": 49.231939999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.180818", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.030550", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.168258", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent Math, Science and English teacher layoffs, protect neighborhood schools from state budget cuts, prevent cuts to essential academic programs, job/college preparation, and preserve small classes, shall San Diego Unified School District levy a Temporary 5 Year Emergency annual tax that Sacramento can not take away of $98/single family home, and taxes on other types of parcels, exempting low income  seniors, with independent audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6519, "fingerprint": "2010|201000074|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000074|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6cf91ea1dc845d95", "measure_id": "201000074", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the definition of Hotel and thereby requiring the payment of Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) by guests of Short Term Rentals (for 30 days or less) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 623, "no_votes": 813, "total_votes": 1436, "percent_yes": 43.3844, "percent_no": 56.6156, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.026162", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.164232", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the definition of Hotel and thereby requiring the payment of Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) by guests of Short Term Rentals (for 30 days or less) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11503, "fingerprint": "2010|201000442|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000442|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "427b9fe519f25e79", "measure_id": "201000442", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent local schools, repair aging, deteriorating classrooms/schools, attract quality teachers and offset State cuts by: removing asbestos, lead paint, repairing roofs, plumbing , wiring; preventing overcrowding ; upgrading instructional; technology, libraries, science labs; improving seismic, fire, and student safety; and improving disabled access; shall San Marcos Unified School District issue $287 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with citizens'oversight, mandatory audits, no money for District salaries, and all funds remaining local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20082, "no_votes": 11600, "total_votes": 31682, "percent_yes": 63.38615, "percent_no": 36.61385, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.181002", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.031172", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.168529", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent local schools, repair aging, deteriorating classrooms/schools, attract quality teachers and offset State cuts by: removing asbestos, lead paint, repairing roofs, plumbing , wiring; preventing overcrowding ; upgrading instructional; technology, libraries, science labs; improving seismic, fire, and student safety; and improving disabled access; shall San Marcos Unified School District issue $287 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with citizens'oversight, mandatory audits, no money for District salaries, and all funds remaining local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6520, "fingerprint": "2010|201000075|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000075|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "79597b92c53631b9", "measure_id": "201000075", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed City Charter of the City of Oceanside be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14951, "no_votes": 12846, "total_votes": 27797, "percent_yes": 53.78638, "percent_no": 46.21362, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.026459", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.164412", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed City Charter of the City of Oceanside be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11501, "fingerprint": "2010|201000440|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000440|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a702be4f39b9e2d8", "measure_id": "201000440", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain a safe and effective quality student learning environment, provide a modern scienc/technology center building and to provide for campus renovations, shall the Julian Union High School District be authorized to issue $2,100,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, including independent citizens' oversight, with mandatory audits, where bond funds will be spent locally, cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, without an increase over projected future tax rates and to qualify for State matching funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1259, "no_votes": 827, "total_votes": 2086, "percent_yes": 60.354745, "percent_no": 39.645255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.180630", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.030177", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.167732", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain a safe and effective quality student learning environment, provide a modern scienc/technology center building and to provide for campus renovations, shall the Julian Union High School District be authorized to issue $2,100,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, including independent citizens' oversight, with mandatory audits, where bond funds will be spent locally, cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, without an increase over projected future tax rates and to qualify for State matching funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6524, "fingerprint": "2010|201000079|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000079|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "42580068b1d76746", "measure_id": "201000079", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance no. 404, that establishes and implements a Business Tax in the City of Solana Beach to increase locally-controlled revenue for general City services and operations, including but not limited to law enforcement, fire, parks and recreation, street repairs, and capital improvement program projects, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1520, "no_votes": 1977, "total_votes": 3497, "percent_yes": 43.46583, "percent_no": 56.53417, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.027594", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.165139", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance no. 404, that establishes and implements a Business Tax in the City of Solana Beach to increase locally-controlled revenue for general City services and operations, including but not limited to law enforcement, fire, parks and recreation, street repairs, and capital improvement program projects, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6525, "fingerprint": "2010|201000438|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000438|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6fd9e5bdf6938ba2", "measure_id": "201000438", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student acces to computers and modern technology; replace portable classrooms and construct new classrooms; build a new science lab and library and other educational facilities; shall Dehesa School District be authorized to issue $5.5 million of bonds within legal interest rates, so long as there is an independent local citizens' oversight commitee and no funds can be taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 507, "no_votes": 361, "total_votes": 868, "percent_yes": 58.41014, "percent_no": 41.58986, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.029634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.166417", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student acces to computers and modern technology; replace portable classrooms and construct new classrooms; build a new science lab and library and other educational facilities; shall Dehesa School District be authorized to issue $5.5 million of bonds within legal interest rates, so long as there is an independent local citizens' oversight commitee and no funds can be taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6527, "fingerprint": "2010|201000443|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000443|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3e4465958f667ad0", "measure_id": "201000443", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve academic programs including math, science, music, arts, reading and writing; retain highly qualified teachers; provide clean and safe schools; and minimize future class-size increases; shall South Bay Union School District raise $1.7 million per year for four years through a parcel tax at a rate described in the voter pamphlet, provided there is independent oversight and all funds are spent on neighborhood schools and cannot be taken by the State and used elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8288, "no_votes": 5591, "total_votes": 13879, "percent_yes": 59.71612, "percent_no": 40.28388, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.031492", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.168788", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve academic programs including math, science, music, arts, reading and writing; retain highly qualified teachers; provide clean and safe schools; and minimize future class-size increases; shall South Bay Union School District raise $1.7 million per year for four years through a parcel tax at a rate described in the voter pamphlet, provided there is independent oversight and all funds are spent on neighborhood schools and cannot be taken by the State and used elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6526, "fingerprint": "2010|201000439|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000439|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bd9449b90fdfae22", "measure_id": "201000439", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade computers and technology, improve energy efficiency/water conservation, replace aging roofs, upgrade inadequate electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation/air-conditiong systems, renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements, shall Encinitas Union School District acquire, construct, upgrade, and equip school facilities by issuing $44,200,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money used for administrative salaries, or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17989, "no_votes": 11211, "total_votes": 29200, "percent_yes": 61.60616, "percent_no": 38.39384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.029908", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.166985", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade computers and technology, improve energy efficiency/water conservation, replace aging roofs, upgrade inadequate electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation/air-conditiong systems, renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements, shall Encinitas Union School District acquire, construct, upgrade, and equip school facilities by issuing $44,200,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money used for administrative salaries, or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11504, "fingerprint": "2010|201000166|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000166|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "e91570a25db22f70", "measure_id": "201000166", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide deferred loans and grants to pay the costs for seismic retrofits of certain multi-story wood-frame buildings with vulnerable soft-story construction at significant risk of substantial damage and collapse during a major earthquake and funded by a qualified governmental housing finance agency for permanent or long-term affordability, or single room occupancy buildings owned by private parties, and pay related costs, shall the City issue up to $46,150,000 of general obligation bonded indebtedness, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 162266, "no_votes": 94324, "total_votes": 256590, "percent_yes": 63.23940999999999, "percent_no": 36.76059000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.182692", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.034585", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.170950", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide deferred loans and grants to pay the costs for seismic retrofits of certain multi-story wood-frame buildings with vulnerable soft-story construction at significant risk of substantial damage and collapse during a major earthquake and funded by a qualified governmental housing finance agency for permanent or long-term affordability, or single room occupancy buildings owned by private parties, and pay related costs, shall the City issue up to $46,150,000 of general obligation bonded indebtedness, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6534, "fingerprint": "2010|201000117|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000117|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "217767cf3dabb392", "measure_id": "201000117", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve earthquake and fire safety and implement critical capital maintenance of its schools and facilities, shall the San Francisco Unified School District be authorized to renew the levy of an annual special tax not to exceed $32.20 per parcel for single family residential and nonresidential parcels and $16.10 per dwelling unit for mixed use and multifamily residential parcels, adjusted for inflation, in its Community Facilities District No. 90-1, and establish its annual appropriations limit at $16,000,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 102873, "no_votes": 44043, "total_votes": 146916, "percent_yes": 70.02165000000001, "percent_no": 29.978349999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.034234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.170678", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve earthquake and fire safety and implement critical capital maintenance of its schools and facilities, shall the San Francisco Unified School District be authorized to renew the levy of an annual special tax not to exceed $32.20 per parcel for single family residential and nonresidential parcels and $16.10 per dwelling unit for mixed use and multifamily residential parcels, adjusted for inflation, in its Community Facilities District No. 90-1, and establish its annual appropriations limit at $16,000,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11505, "fingerprint": "2010|201000167|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000167|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3786598ea7acef35", "measure_id": "201000167", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase employee contributions to the Retirement System for retirement benefits; decrease employer contributions to the Health Service System for health benefits for employees, retirees and their dependents; change rules for arbitration proceedings about City collective bargaining agreements; and prohibit any increase in employee compensation for affected City employees for five years if a court invalidates any part of this measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 113894, "no_votes": 150734, "total_votes": 264628, "percent_yes": 43.039286, "percent_no": 56.960714, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.182899", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.034895", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.171444", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase employee contributions to the Retirement System for retirement benefits; decrease employer contributions to the Health Service System for health benefits for employees, retirees and their dependents; change rules for arbitration proceedings about City collective bargaining agreements; and prohibit any increase in employee compensation for affected City employees for five years if a court invalidates any part of this measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6528, "fingerprint": "2010|201000040|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000040|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "cc27bfc0ab295879", "measure_id": "201000040", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve fire, earthquake and emergency response and ensure firefighters a reliable water supply for fires and disasters, through projects including: improving deteriorating pipes, hydrants, reservoirs, water cisterns and pumps built after the 1906 earthquake; improving neighborhood fire stations; replacing the seismically-unsafe emergency command center with an earthquake-safe building; and to pay related costs, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $412,300,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117553, "no_votes": 30484, "total_votes": 148037, "percent_yes": 79.40785, "percent_no": 20.592150000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.032119", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.169042", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve fire, earthquake and emergency response and ensure firefighters a reliable water supply for fires and disasters, through projects including: improving deteriorating pipes, hydrants, reservoirs, water cisterns and pumps built after the 1906 earthquake; improving neighborhood fire stations; replacing the seismically-unsafe emergency command center with an earthquake-safe building; and to pay related costs, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $412,300,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11506, "fingerprint": "2010|201000168|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000168|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3e59fd3a81d5a58e", "measure_id": "201000168", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the Mayor to appear in person at one regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors each month to engage in formal policy discussions with the Board?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 154776, "no_votes": 103673, "total_votes": 258449, "percent_yes": 59.88648, "percent_no": 40.11352, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.183090", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.035187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.171879", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the Mayor to appear in person at one regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors each month to engage in formal policy discussions with the Board?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6529, "fingerprint": "2010|201000041|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000041|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "fadcd38c0b42a4da", "measure_id": "201000041", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the City to have a Film Commission, consisting of five members appointed by the Board of Supervisors and six members appointed by the Mayor, with final authority to issue permits to film in San Francisco?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66125, "no_votes": 76834, "total_votes": 142959, "percent_yes": 46.254522, "percent_no": 53.745478, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.032548", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.169300", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the City to have a Film Commission, consisting of five members appointed by the Board of Supervisors and six members appointed by the Mayor, with final authority to issue permits to film in San Francisco?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11507, "fingerprint": "2010|201000169|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000169|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a25a5b7a4973a4a2", "measure_id": "201000169", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City allow non-citizen residents of San Francisco who are 18 years of age or older and have children living in the San Francisco Unified School District to vote for members of the Board of Education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 118608, "no_votes": 144418, "total_votes": 263026, "percent_yes": 45.09364, "percent_no": 54.90636, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.183278", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.035456", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.172298", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City allow non-citizen residents of San Francisco who are 18 years of age or older and have children living in the San Francisco Unified School District to vote for members of the Board of Education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6530, "fingerprint": "2010|201000042|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000042|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b49f6e20e6c54a56", "measure_id": "201000042", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City: calculate retirement benefits for new City employees using average monthly compensation over two years instead of over one year; increase the retirement benefit employee contribution for new safety employees and new employees in positions covered by the State retirement system; and require that savings from reduced employer contributions to the City\u2019s retirement system be deposited in the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 112100, "no_votes": 30222, "total_votes": 142322, "percent_yes": 78.76505, "percent_no": 21.234949999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.033040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.169561", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City: calculate retirement benefits for new City employees using average monthly compensation over two years instead of over one year; increase the retirement benefit employee contribution for new safety employees and new employees in positions covered by the State retirement system; and require that savings from reduced employer contributions to the City\u2019s retirement system be deposited in the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11508, "fingerprint": "2010|201000170|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000170|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d8f267f8cbcf91bd", "measure_id": "201000170", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to establish Election Day voter registration specifically for municipal elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 118217, "no_votes": 132189, "total_votes": 250406, "percent_yes": 47.21013, "percent_no": 52.78987, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.183468", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.035727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.172781", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to establish Election Day voter registration specifically for municipal elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6531, "fingerprint": "2010|201000043|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000043|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9920ab6364b17c0b", "measure_id": "201000043", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City require that the Police Department\u2019s annual budget include a line item for the cost of security provided to City officials and visiting dignitaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80364, "no_votes": 63600, "total_votes": 143964, "percent_yes": 55.82229, "percent_no": 44.17771, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.033324", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.169854", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City require that the Police Department\u2019s annual budget include a line item for the cost of security provided to City officials and visiting dignitaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6532, "fingerprint": "2010|201000044|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000044|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "01451ea8a3d18c52", "measure_id": "201000044", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend its Residential Rent Ordinance to add provisions for tenants to apply to the Rent Board to postpone most rent increases if they become unemployed, their wages decrease by 20% or more, or they do not receive a cost of living increase in their government benefits and those benefits are their sole income?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62239, "no_votes": 85071, "total_votes": 147310, "percent_yes": 42.250356, "percent_no": 57.749644, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.033624", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.170133", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend its Residential Rent Ordinance to add provisions for tenants to apply to the Rent Board to postpone most rent increases if they become unemployed, their wages decrease by 20% or more, or they do not receive a cost of living increase in their government benefits and those benefits are their sole income?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11509, "fingerprint": "2010|201000171|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000171|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "add73af4c9d2d9ea", "measure_id": "201000171", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City eliminate the formula for setting minimum MUNI operator wages and instead set MUNI operator wages through collective bargaining and binding arbitration; add rules for arbitration proceedings regarding MTA\u2019s transit employees; and make other changes to terms of employment for MTA employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 164234, "no_votes": 88671, "total_votes": 252905, "percent_yes": 64.93901, "percent_no": 35.060990000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.183654", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.036130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.173044", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City eliminate the formula for setting minimum MUNI operator wages and instead set MUNI operator wages through collective bargaining and binding arbitration; add rules for arbitration proceedings regarding MTA\u2019s transit employees; and make other changes to terms of employment for MTA employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6533, "fingerprint": "2010|201000045|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000045|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "adcba84fba8a89ea", "measure_id": "201000045", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy that the northern end of the planned San Francisco-to-Los Angeles high-speed rail line be located at the Transbay Transit Center at First and Mission streets?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120788, "no_votes": 23421, "total_votes": 144209, "percent_yes": 83.75898600000001, "percent_no": 16.241013999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.033900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.170405", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy that the northern end of the planned San Francisco-to-Los Angeles high-speed rail line be located at the Transbay Transit Center at First and Mission streets?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6535, "fingerprint": "2010|201000172|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000172|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d2d592571171cf04", "measure_id": "201000172", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City prohibit elected City officials from serving on San Francisco political party county central committees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 103141, "no_votes": 139878, "total_votes": 243019, "percent_yes": 42.441538, "percent_no": 57.558462, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.036405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.173324", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City prohibit elected City officials from serving on San Francisco political party county central committees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6536, "fingerprint": "2010|201000173|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000173|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3fd3b09d9ab27e4a", "measure_id": "201000173", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City open polling places on the Saturday before the November 2011 election if donors contribute enough money to pay for the costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 150701, "no_votes": 103486, "total_votes": 254187, "percent_yes": 59.28745, "percent_no": 40.71255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.036679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.173580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City open polling places on the Saturday before the November 2011 election if donors contribute enough money to pay for the costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6537, "fingerprint": "2010|201000174|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000174|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1524e9b30567d766", "measure_id": "201000174", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase the hotel tax rate from 14% to 16% for the next three years, confirm that anyone collecting rent from a hotel guest must also collect tax on room rental and related charges, and define \u201cpermanent resident\u201d so that only an individual could qualify for the \u201cpermanent resident\u201d exemption?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 116313, "no_votes": 139206, "total_votes": 255519, "percent_yes": 45.520294, "percent_no": 54.479706, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.036955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.173834", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the hotel tax rate from 14% to 16% for the next three years, confirm that anyone collecting rent from a hotel guest must also collect tax on room rental and related charges, and define \u201cpermanent resident\u201d so that only an individual could qualify for the \u201cpermanent resident\u201d exemption?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6538, "fingerprint": "2010|201000175|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000175|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d5995f972e1f849e", "measure_id": "201000175", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City keep the hotel tax rate at 14%, confirm that anyone collecting rent from a hotel guest must also collect tax on room rental and related charges, and define \u201cpermanent resident\u201d so that only an individual could qualify for the \u201cpermanent resident\u201d exemption?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95357, "no_votes": 152159, "total_votes": 247516, "percent_yes": 38.52559, "percent_no": 61.47441, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.037230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.174110", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City keep the hotel tax rate at 14%, confirm that anyone collecting rent from a hotel guest must also collect tax on room rental and related charges, and define \u201cpermanent resident\u201d so that only an individual could qualify for the \u201cpermanent resident\u201d exemption?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6539, "fingerprint": "2010|201000176|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000176|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9b5d795cafe2bc7e", "measure_id": "201000176", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend its Police Code to prohibit sitting or lying on a public sidewalk in San Francisco between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m., with certain exceptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 142601, "no_votes": 120023, "total_votes": 262624, "percent_yes": 54.29854, "percent_no": 45.70146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.037540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.174369", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend its Police Code to prohibit sitting or lying on a public sidewalk in San Francisco between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m., with certain exceptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6540, "fingerprint": "2010|201000177|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000177|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "24e4b85db3464b19", "measure_id": "201000177", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City require the Police Commission to adopt a written community policing policy, require the Chief of Police to establish a comprehensive Foot Beat Patrol Program, and not amend its Police Code to prohibit sitting or lying on sidewalks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117608, "no_votes": 134808, "total_votes": 252416, "percent_yes": 46.592927, "percent_no": 53.407073, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.037839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.174638", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City require the Police Commission to adopt a written community policing policy, require the Chief of Police to establish a comprehensive Foot Beat Patrol Program, and not amend its Police Code to prohibit sitting or lying on sidewalks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6541, "fingerprint": "2010|201000178|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000178|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "685a705491aaca90", "measure_id": "201000178", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase its real property transfer tax rate to 2.0% for sales and long-term leases of real property valued at $5 million to $10 million and to 2.5% for sales and long-term leases of real property valued at $10 million or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 149350, "no_votes": 105979, "total_votes": 255329, "percent_yes": 58.49316, "percent_no": 41.50684, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.038107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.174913", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase its real property transfer tax rate to 2.0% for sales and long-term leases of real property valued at $5 million to $10 million and to 2.5% for sales and long-term leases of real property valued at $10 million or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6543, "fingerprint": "2010|201000119|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000119|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "4a30e9e580d3e0e6", "measure_id": "201000119", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Daniel Castillo be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2035, "no_votes": 1258, "total_votes": 3293, "percent_yes": 61.79774999999999, "percent_no": 38.20225000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.038747", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.175459", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Daniel Castillo be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6542, "fingerprint": "2010|201000118|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000118|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "93d8cf8a7d745de8", "measure_id": "201000118", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall a portion of Tracy Joint Unified School District and the Lammersville Elementary School District be unified to form the Lammersville Joint Unified School District with a five-member board elected at large while permitting the Mountain House Elementary School District to continue to exist as an independent elementary school district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 909, "no_votes": 210, "total_votes": 1119, "percent_yes": 81.233245, "percent_no": 18.766755000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.038374", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.175187", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a portion of Tracy Joint Unified School District and the Lammersville Elementary School District be unified to form the Lammersville Joint Unified School District with a five-member board elected at large while permitting the Mountain House Elementary School District to continue to exist as an independent elementary school district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6547, "fingerprint": "2010|201000337|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000337|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "7d357704d02611a5", "measure_id": "201000337", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "City Clerk's Position - Changing the City Clerk's Position from an elected to an appointed position. Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8841, "no_votes": 7861, "total_votes": 16702, "percent_yes": 52.93378, "percent_no": 47.06622, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.040135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.176607", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City Clerk's Position - Changing the City Clerk's Position from an elected to an appointed position. Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6548, "fingerprint": "2010|201000338|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000338|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "30b9e19ac6a5a716", "measure_id": "201000338", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help prevent additional budget cuts and maintain City services, including: police (patrol, 911, command, gang/narcotics enforcement, crime investigations, other police services); fire protection, emergency services, and other fire services; parks/sports field maintenance; support services; senior, teen, and youth services; art programs; and other general services, shall the City of Tracy enact a 1/2 cent sales tax, expiring in five years, with resident oversight, annula independent audits, and all funds used for the City of Tracy services only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10553, "no_votes": 7546, "total_votes": 18099, "percent_yes": 58.30709, "percent_no": 41.69291, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.040407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.176791", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help prevent additional budget cuts and maintain City services, including: police (patrol, 911, command, gang/narcotics enforcement, crime investigations, other police services); fire protection, emergency services, and other fire services; parks/sports field maintenance; support services; senior, teen, and youth services; art programs; and other general services, shall the City of Tracy enact a 1/2 cent sales tax, expiring in five years, with resident oversight, annula independent audits, and all funds used for the City of Tracy services only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6544, "fingerprint": "2010|201000334|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000334|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "6ceaebb676b60c97", "measure_id": "201000334", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing local taxes, and only by using existing affordable housing funding, shall public or publicly assisted housing providers, within the City of Stockton, according to the City's General Plan, construct, develop, acquire, rehabilitate, and/or convert housing project(s) into decent, safe, sanitary, and uncrowded units for low-income, elderly, or handicapped persons, up to 500 units annually, for ten years, with any unused units carried over annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40005, "no_votes": 14182, "total_votes": 54187, "percent_yes": 73.82767, "percent_no": 26.172330000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.039135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.175934", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing local taxes, and only by using existing affordable housing funding, shall public or publicly assisted housing providers, within the City of Stockton, according to the City's General Plan, construct, develop, acquire, rehabilitate, and/or convert housing project(s) into decent, safe, sanitary, and uncrowded units for low-income, elderly, or handicapped persons, up to 500 units annually, for ten years, with any unused units carried over annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6545, "fingerprint": "2010|201000335|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000335|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "255b7e70e58c39a5", "measure_id": "201000335", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be amended to provide for a modernized structure and administration of the Fire Department that includes revisions to the appointment procedure and duties of the Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chief; revisions to impasse resolution procedures for employee disputes; exempting the Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chief from the civil service system; and removing mandatory vacation accrual provisions for fire department employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28841, "no_votes": 26306, "total_votes": 55147, "percent_yes": 52.2984, "percent_no": 47.7016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.039508", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.176175", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be amended to provide for a modernized structure and administration of the Fire Department that includes revisions to the appointment procedure and duties of the Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chief; revisions to impasse resolution procedures for employee disputes; exempting the Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chief from the civil service system; and removing mandatory vacation accrual provisions for fire department employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6546, "fingerprint": "2010|201000336|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000336|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "13cc6ac2d302d5e1", "measure_id": "201000336", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Stockton's Business License Tax Ordinance be amended to establish new business categories of: (1) permitted \"Medical Cannabis Dispensaries\" at a tax rate of $25.00 for each $1,000.00 of gross receipts; and (2) non-medical \"Marijuana Businesses\" at a tax rate of $100.00 for each $1,000.00 of gross receipts, for general fund revenue to mitigate impacts on City services such as police, fire and code enforcement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35961, "no_votes": 18032, "total_votes": 53993, "percent_yes": 66.603076, "percent_no": 33.396924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.039834", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.176380", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Stockton's Business License Tax Ordinance be amended to establish new business categories of: (1) permitted \"Medical Cannabis Dispensaries\" at a tax rate of $25.00 for each $1,000.00 of gross receipts; and (2) non-medical \"Marijuana Businesses\" at a tax rate of $100.00 for each $1,000.00 of gross receipts, for general fund revenue to mitigate impacts on City services such as police, fire and code enforcement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6549, "fingerprint": "2010|201000444|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000444|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "025b10f688ebb3cc", "measure_id": "201000444", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent schools, protect student safety, offset state budget cuts and renovate aging/deteriorating schools by upgrading classrooms, science labs, libraries and instructional technology; removing asbestos and hazardous materials; replacing leaky roofs and deteriorating plumbing; upgrading outdated electrical systems to accommodate classroom technology, upgrading fire alarms and school security shall Jefferson School District issue $35.4 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight and audits, no money for administrator salaries and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2354, "no_votes": 1146, "total_votes": 3500, "percent_yes": 67.25714, "percent_no": 32.74285999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.040678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.176979", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent schools, protect student safety, offset state budget cuts and renovate aging/deteriorating schools by upgrading classrooms, science labs, libraries and instructional technology; removing asbestos and hazardous materials; replacing leaky roofs and deteriorating plumbing; upgrading outdated electrical systems to accommodate classroom technology, upgrading fire alarms and school security shall Jefferson School District issue $35.4 million in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight and audits, no money for administrator salaries and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6550, "fingerprint": "2010|201000080|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000080|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "193969462a2b3895", "measure_id": "201000080", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arroyo Grande fund construction of a new Police Station and refinance the 2003 Fire Station bonds by issuing 30-year bonds not to exceed $6,000,000 provided that the tax rate is maintained at or below the existing rate for the Fire Station bonds and a portion of the bond payments will be paid by revenues from the 2006 Local Sales Tax Measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3627, "no_votes": 1947, "total_votes": 5574, "percent_yes": 65.06997, "percent_no": 34.93003, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.040947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.177170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arroyo Grande fund construction of a new Police Station and refinance the 2003 Fire Station bonds by issuing 30-year bonds not to exceed $6,000,000 provided that the tax rate is maintained at or below the existing rate for the Fire Station bonds and a portion of the bond payments will be paid by revenues from the 2006 Local Sales Tax Measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6556, "fingerprint": "2010|201000344|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000344|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "51be14e872aed636", "measure_id": "201000344", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to prohibit Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in the City of Morro Bay?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2169, "no_votes": 2724, "total_votes": 4893, "percent_yes": 44.328633, "percent_no": 55.671367, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.042658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.178263", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to prohibit Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in the City of Morro Bay?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6551, "fingerprint": "2010|201000339|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000339|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201000339", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4114, "no_votes": 2890, "total_votes": 7004, "percent_yes": 58.73786, "percent_no": 41.26214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.041300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.177352", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6552, "fingerprint": "2010|201000340|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000340|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201000340", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3916, "no_votes": 3084, "total_votes": 7000, "percent_yes": 55.94286, "percent_no": 44.05714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.041599", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.177538", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6553, "fingerprint": "2010|201000341|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000341|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "e185d41a946b291f", "measure_id": "201000341", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a Mayor and four Council Members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8562, "no_votes": 1687, "total_votes": 10249, "percent_yes": 83.539855, "percent_no": 16.460144999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.041865", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.177718", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a Mayor and four Council Members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6554, "fingerprint": "2010|201000342|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000342|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "51bc78433c3b3a90", "measure_id": "201000342", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5706, "no_votes": 4545, "total_votes": 10251, "percent_yes": 55.662864, "percent_no": 44.337136, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.042129", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.177899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6555, "fingerprint": "2010|201000343|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000343|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "201000343", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4496, "no_votes": 5664, "total_votes": 10160, "percent_yes": 44.25197, "percent_no": 55.74803, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.042391", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.178081", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6557, "fingerprint": "2010|201000345|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000345|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "fbc903626c02b3ef", "measure_id": "201000345", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo adopt an ordinance amending the Margarita Area Specific Plan, Airport Area Specific Plan, Related Facilities Master Plans, and General Plan Land-Use and Circulation Elements for the purpose of eliminating a portion of the Prado Road alignment adopted by the San Luis Obispo City Council by Resolution 9615 (2004 Series)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3063, "no_votes": 12260, "total_votes": 15323, "percent_yes": 19.989558, "percent_no": 80.010442, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.042922", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.178445", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo adopt an ordinance amending the Margarita Area Specific Plan, Airport Area Specific Plan, Related Facilities Master Plans, and General Plan Land-Use and Circulation Elements for the purpose of eliminating a portion of the Prado Road alignment adopted by the San Luis Obispo City Council by Resolution 9615 (2004 Series)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6558, "fingerprint": "2010|201000445|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000445|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "ba9b6c93414344d6", "measure_id": "201000445", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To expand vocational education programs and facilities; upgrade classroom computers and technology; construct a Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics facility; rebuild and replace roofs; and repair, renovate, construct and acquire classrooms and facilities throughout the District; shall Atascadero Unified School District be authorzied to issue $117 million of bonds within legal interest rates, so long as there is an independent local citizens' oversight committee and no funds can be taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9165, "no_votes": 4864, "total_votes": 14029, "percent_yes": 65.32896000000001, "percent_no": 34.67103999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.043192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.178627", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand vocational education programs and facilities; upgrade classroom computers and technology; construct a Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics facility; rebuild and replace roofs; and repair, renovate, construct and acquire classrooms and facilities throughout the District; shall Atascadero Unified School District be authorzied to issue $117 million of bonds within legal interest rates, so long as there is an independent local citizens' oversight committee and no funds can be taken by the State and spent elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6559, "fingerprint": "2010|201000006|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000006|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2fb38fc1be3213e9", "measure_id": "201000006", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect local schools from damaging State budget cuts, provide stable local funding that cannot be taken away by the State, and preserve quality education by attracting and retaining qualified teachers and staff, maintaining school libraries, providing middle school art and music programs and supporting small class sizes, shall San Mateo-Foster City School District increase the expiring school parcel tax by $96 for seven years, with annual cost of living adjustments, exemptions for seniors and independent fiscal oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14689, "no_votes": 7238, "total_votes": 21927, "percent_yes": 66.99047, "percent_no": 33.00953, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-02-23", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.043502", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.178808", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect local schools from damaging State budget cuts, provide stable local funding that cannot be taken away by the State, and preserve quality education by attracting and retaining qualified teachers and staff, maintaining school libraries, providing middle school art and music programs and supporting small class sizes, shall San Mateo-Foster City School District increase the expiring school parcel tax by $96 for seven years, with annual cost of living adjustments, exemptions for seniors and independent fiscal oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6560, "fingerprint": "2010|201000007|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000007|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "1d0e90224c68c8c3", "measure_id": "201000007", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education, restore and protect critical school programs, including math and science, reading and writing, books and classroom materials, school library services, art and music, and to retain qualified teachers shall Burlingame Elementary School District renew its expiring education parcel tax, without increase, of $180 per parcel for ten years with no funds for administrators' salaries, all funds going to local elementary and middle schools, and an exemption for senior citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4685, "no_votes": 1899, "total_votes": 6584, "percent_yes": 71.157354, "percent_no": 28.842646000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-03-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.043799", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.179001", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education, restore and protect critical school programs, including math and science, reading and writing, books and classroom materials, school library services, art and music, and to retain qualified teachers shall Burlingame Elementary School District renew its expiring education parcel tax, without increase, of $180 per parcel for ten years with no funds for administrators' salaries, all funds going to local elementary and middle schools, and an exemption for senior citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6561, "fingerprint": "2010|201000020|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000020|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "203825a1a2f3d5ff", "measure_id": "201000020", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect the excellent schools servinc the children of our community by maintaining small class sizes and high quality teachers in the face of deep state budget cuts and growing local enrollment, shall the Menlo Park City School District levy a 7-year parcel tax of $178 per year, adjusted annually for inflation, to be spent only on teachers and essential educational programs, with an exemption available to individuals age 65 and over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5877, "no_votes": 1844, "total_votes": 7721, "percent_yes": 76.11708, "percent_no": 23.88292, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.044066", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.179204", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the excellent schools servinc the children of our community by maintaining small class sizes and high quality teachers in the face of deep state budget cuts and growing local enrollment, shall the Menlo Park City School District levy a 7-year parcel tax of $178 per year, adjusted annually for inflation, to be spent only on teachers and essential educational programs, with an exemption available to individuals age 65 and over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6562, "fingerprint": "2010|201000021|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000021|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f341c6848687b2cb", "measure_id": "201000021", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain academic excellence and limit the impact of substantial state budges cuts, shall the Portola Valley Elementary School District continue its emphasis on science, math, reading and writing instruction; retain qualified and experienced teachers; minimize class size increases; and support arts and music programs, by levying $168 per parcel tax for four years with an exemption for seniors, mandatory annual audits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all funds staying in Portola Valley for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1989, "no_votes": 574, "total_votes": 2563, "percent_yes": 77.60437, "percent_no": 22.395629999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.044348", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.179394", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain academic excellence and limit the impact of substantial state budges cuts, shall the Portola Valley Elementary School District continue its emphasis on science, math, reading and writing instruction; retain qualified and experienced teachers; minimize class size increases; and support arts and music programs, by levying $168 per parcel tax for four years with an exemption for seniors, mandatory annual audits, independent citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries and all funds staying in Portola Valley for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6564, "fingerprint": "2010|201000120|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000120|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "465b8bdd1291d431", "measure_id": "201000120", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue student achievement in our local elementary, middle, and high schools; preserve strong academic programs including science, math, reading, and writing, keep schools open; retain qualified teachers and smaller class sizes; and maintain updated classroom computer technology; shall the Cabrillo Unified School District assess an annual education parcel tax of $150 per parcel, for five years, with annual audits, citizen oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, and all revenues staying in our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5780, "no_votes": 2331, "total_votes": 8111, "percent_yes": 71.26125, "percent_no": 28.738749999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.044917", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.179762", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue student achievement in our local elementary, middle, and high schools; preserve strong academic programs including science, math, reading, and writing, keep schools open; retain qualified teachers and smaller class sizes; and maintain updated classroom computer technology; shall the Cabrillo Unified School District assess an annual education parcel tax of $150 per parcel, for five years, with annual audits, citizen oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, and all revenues staying in our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6565, "fingerprint": "2010|201000121|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000121|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5382bdea1a3bd0e6", "measure_id": "201000121", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide College of San Mateo, Skyline College, and Canada College local funds the State cannot take away and ensure affordable quality education for students including training for careers in nursing, healthcare, technology, engineering, sciences, police, firefighting, maintaining core academics in reading, writing, math, preparing students for universities, and keeping libraries open, shall San Mateo County Community College District levy $34 per parcel annually for four years and establish Citizens' Oversight, exempt seniors, and prohibit proceeds for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 81843, "no_votes": 40105, "total_votes": 121948, "percent_yes": 67.11303, "percent_no": 32.886970000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.045213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.179944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide College of San Mateo, Skyline College, and Canada College local funds the State cannot take away and ensure affordable quality education for students including training for careers in nursing, healthcare, technology, engineering, sciences, police, firefighting, maintaining core academics in reading, writing, math, preparing students for universities, and keeping libraries open, shall San Mateo County Community College District levy $34 per parcel annually for four years and establish Citizens' Oversight, exempt seniors, and prohibit proceeds for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6563, "fingerprint": "2010|201000081|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000081|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "edd6b55ca5df58a9", "measure_id": "201000081", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Voters adopt the Rent Stabilization and Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance? Passage would 1) repeal the City's existing rent stabilization ordinance with respect to residential tenancies other than mobile home park space tenancies; 2) update procedures to establish permissible rent levels to maintain consistency with state law; 3) protect residential tenants from unreasonable rent increases, arbitrary, discriminatory, or retaliatory evictions, and 4) assure landlords the right to a fair return on their properties.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1166, "no_votes": 309, "total_votes": 1475, "percent_yes": 79.05084500000001, "percent_no": 20.94915499999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.044618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.179580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Voters adopt the Rent Stabilization and Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance? Passage would 1) repeal the City's existing rent stabilization ordinance with respect to residential tenancies other than mobile home park space tenancies; 2) update procedures to establish permissible rent levels to maintain consistency with state law; 3) protect residential tenants from unreasonable rent increases, arbitrary, discriminatory, or retaliatory evictions, and 4) assure landlords the right to a fair return on their properties.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6575, "fingerprint": "2010|201000446|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000446|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c86e1c3e3e0e2871", "measure_id": "201000446", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue quality education/prevent classroom overcrowding, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores School District repair/replace leaking roofs, provide additional classrooms for science, math, general instruction, construct, acquire, repair classrooms/facilities/sites/equipment, meet current fire/safety codes, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation, safety/security sytems by issuing $25,000,000 of bonds, qualifying for State matching funds, with citizens' oversight, no funds for administrator salaries/all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9509, "no_votes": 4922, "total_votes": 14431, "percent_yes": 65.89287, "percent_no": 34.10713, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.048499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.181762", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue quality education/prevent classroom overcrowding, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores School District repair/replace leaking roofs, provide additional classrooms for science, math, general instruction, construct, acquire, repair classrooms/facilities/sites/equipment, meet current fire/safety codes, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation, safety/security sytems by issuing $25,000,000 of bonds, qualifying for State matching funds, with citizens' oversight, no funds for administrator salaries/all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6579, "fingerprint": "2010|201000450|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000450|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "40feef815a5dcba1", "measure_id": "201000450", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe, modern classrooms and educational support facilities by replacing deteriorated portable classrooms with permanent classrooms; repairing deteriorated roofs; providing disabled students access; upgrading science labs, libraries, technology and restrooms; enhancing safety, fire detection and security systems; improving energy efficiency; replacing outdated electrical, plumbing, and heating sytems, shall South San Francisco Unified School District issue $162,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13758, "no_votes": 3985, "total_votes": 17743, "percent_yes": 77.54044, "percent_no": 22.459559999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.049707", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.182496", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe, modern classrooms and educational support facilities by replacing deteriorated portable classrooms with permanent classrooms; repairing deteriorated roofs; providing disabled students access; upgrading science labs, libraries, technology and restrooms; enhancing safety, fire detection and security systems; improving energy efficiency; replacing outdated electrical, plumbing, and heating sytems, shall South San Francisco Unified School District issue $162,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6568, "fingerprint": "2010|201000347|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000347|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ecbc4225940718e0", "measure_id": "201000347", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect quality of life in the City of Half Moon Bay by maintaining essential local services including local library hours, 911 emergency police response, youth and senior programs and services, a local police department, park and recreational programs, street and pothole repair and other  general City services, shall the City of Half Moon Bay levy a one cent sales tax, which the State cannot take away, and with independent annual audits and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2127, "no_votes": 2363, "total_votes": 4490, "percent_yes": 47.37194, "percent_no": 52.62806, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.046048", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.180490", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality of life in the City of Half Moon Bay by maintaining essential local services including local library hours, 911 emergency police response, youth and senior programs and services, a local police department, park and recreational programs, street and pothole repair and other  general City services, shall the City of Half Moon Bay levy a one cent sales tax, which the State cannot take away, and with independent annual audits and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6570, "fingerprint": "2010|201000349|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000349|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7a5b62674661fe6c", "measure_id": "201000349", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"Measure to limit retirement benefits for new City of Menlo Park employees (Except Sworn Police Officers) and to restrict City Council from increasing benefits in the future without voter approval\", be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8238, "no_votes": 3311, "total_votes": 11549, "percent_yes": 71.33085, "percent_no": 28.669150000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.046964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.180852", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"Measure to limit retirement benefits for new City of Menlo Park employees (Except Sworn Police Officers) and to restrict City Council from increasing benefits in the future without voter approval\", be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6566, "fingerprint": "2010|201000179|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000179|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "96ed07303197f53d", "measure_id": "201000179", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To help maintain neighborhood streets, fix potholes, provide transportation options, improve traffic circulation, provide transit options including senior and disabled services, reduce congestion, reduce water pollution from oil and gas runoff, and provide safe routes to schools, shall the Congestion Management Agency for San Mateo County levy a $10 registration fee, for 25 years, on vehicles registered in San Mateo County, requiring annual audits and all funds be spent for programs and projects in San Mateo County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 110549, "no_votes": 90740, "total_votes": 201289, "percent_yes": 54.920536, "percent_no": 45.079464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.045484", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.180125", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help maintain neighborhood streets, fix potholes, provide transportation options, improve traffic circulation, provide transit options including senior and disabled services, reduce congestion, reduce water pollution from oil and gas runoff, and provide safe routes to schools, shall the Congestion Management Agency for San Mateo County levy a $10 registration fee, for 25 years, on vehicles registered in San Mateo County, requiring annual audits and all funds be spent for programs and projects in San Mateo County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6576, "fingerprint": "2010|201000447|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000447|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "360084ff422acb90", "measure_id": "201000447", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue quality education, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary School District (SFID) repair/replace leaking roofs, construct, acquire, repair classrooms/facilities/sites/equipment, meet current fire/safety codes, improve disabled access, provide science classrooms/additional classrooms to prevent overcrowding, upgrade technology, replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and security systems by issuing $35,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with citizens' oversight, no funds for administrators, and funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6744, "no_votes": 3795, "total_votes": 10539, "percent_yes": 63.99089, "percent_no": 36.00911, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.048832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.181947", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue quality education, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary School District (SFID) repair/replace leaking roofs, construct, acquire, repair classrooms/facilities/sites/equipment, meet current fire/safety codes, improve disabled access, provide science classrooms/additional classrooms to prevent overcrowding, upgrade technology, replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and security systems by issuing $35,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with citizens' oversight, no funds for administrators, and funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6578, "fingerprint": "2010|201000449|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000449|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e404df32491456b9", "measure_id": "201000449", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare local students for college/21st century jobs, shall San Mateo Union High School District provide classrooms/labs for science, math, and job-training, update educational facilities to meet current safety codes, provide modern classroom technology/computers, support academic programs/teachers by eliminating debt, and repair, construct and acquire equipment, sites, schools/facilities, by issuing $186,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries and all funds supporting only local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43251, "no_votes": 26603, "total_votes": 69854, "percent_yes": 61.91628, "percent_no": 38.08372, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.049376", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.182314", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare local students for college/21st century jobs, shall San Mateo Union High School District provide classrooms/labs for science, math, and job-training, update educational facilities to meet current safety codes, provide modern classroom technology/computers, support academic programs/teachers by eliminating debt, and repair, construct and acquire equipment, sites, schools/facilities, by issuing $186,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries and all funds supporting only local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6577, "fingerprint": "2010|201000448|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000448|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8f19b0b99373f09a", "measure_id": "201000448", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve academic programs including reading, writing, science and math; fund computer technology/vocational training, and retain highly qualified teachers; shall Jefferson Union High School District levy $96 per parcel annually for four years (as described in the voter pamphlet), so long as seniors are exempt, no money is used for administrators' salaries, independent citizens' committee oversight is required, and all funds are spent on neighborhood schools and cannot be taken by the State and used elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21146, "no_votes": 10975, "total_votes": 32121, "percent_yes": 65.83232, "percent_no": 34.167680000000004, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.049103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.182132", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve academic programs including reading, writing, science and math; fund computer technology/vocational training, and retain highly qualified teachers; shall Jefferson Union High School District levy $96 per parcel annually for four years (as described in the voter pamphlet), so long as seniors are exempt, no money is used for administrators' salaries, independent citizens' committee oversight is required, and all funds are spent on neighborhood schools and cannot be taken by the State and used elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6567, "fingerprint": "2010|201000346|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000346|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201000346", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 163, "no_votes": 155, "total_votes": 318, "percent_yes": 51.25786, "percent_no": 48.74214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.045779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.180306", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6572, "fingerprint": "2010|201000351|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000351|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "82794c5136b119c7", "measure_id": "201000351", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure funding for general city services, shall the City of Pacifica approve an ordinance amending the Pacifica Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) on the rent charged to hotel guests within the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8018, "no_votes": 5414, "total_votes": 13432, "percent_yes": 59.69327, "percent_no": 40.30673, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.047572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.181218", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure funding for general city services, shall the City of Pacifica approve an ordinance amending the Pacifica Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) on the rent charged to hotel guests within the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6569, "fingerprint": "2010|201000348|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000348|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "41c226e5d561f81c", "measure_id": "201000348", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to consolidate with local school district and statewide general elections, and to help reduce the City's elections costs, shall all current City Council terms be extended by one year and shall section 1.24.010 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code be amended to provide that the City's general municipal election be held in each even-numbered year commencing with the year 2012?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3584, "no_votes": 732, "total_votes": 4316, "percent_yes": 83.03985, "percent_no": 16.96015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.046316", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.180671", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to consolidate with local school district and statewide general elections, and to help reduce the City's elections costs, shall all current City Council terms be extended by one year and shall section 1.24.010 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code be amended to provide that the City's general municipal election be held in each even-numbered year commencing with the year 2012?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6571, "fingerprint": "2010|201000350|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000350|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "791237c96af12856", "measure_id": "201000350", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters affirm the decision of the Menlo Park City Council to approve the Menlo Gateway project and amend the City's General Plan to permit construction of offices, research and development space, a hotel, health club and restaurant on property located east of Highway 101 near Marsh Road?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7612, "no_votes": 4189, "total_votes": 11801, "percent_yes": 64.50301, "percent_no": 35.49699, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.047288", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.181036", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters affirm the decision of the Menlo Park City Council to approve the Menlo Gateway project and amend the City's General Plan to permit construction of offices, research and development space, a hotel, health club and restaurant on property located east of Highway 101 near Marsh Road?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6574, "fingerprint": "2010|201000353|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000353|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "10e4c0f70cf945c3", "measure_id": "201000353", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the San Mateo County Charter be amended to require filling of vacancies on the Board of Supervisors by election for vacancies occurring on or before October 15th of the third year of the term, and by election or appointment for vacancies after October 15th; and to authorize, for vacancies in any county elected office, and all-mailed ballot election, and commencement of the process to fill the vacancy on the date a resignation letter is filed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115887, "no_votes": 60008, "total_votes": 175895, "percent_yes": 65.88419, "percent_no": 34.115809999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.048123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.181581", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Mateo County Charter be amended to require filling of vacancies on the Board of Supervisors by election for vacancies occurring on or before October 15th of the third year of the term, and by election or appointment for vacancies after October 15th; and to authorize, for vacancies in any county elected office, and all-mailed ballot election, and commencement of the process to fill the vacancy on the date a resignation letter is filed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6573, "fingerprint": "2010|201000352|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000352|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6a06a1e65c8b1265", "measure_id": "201000352", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be adopted providing prospectively that no person who has served two terms of office as a Pacifica City Councilmembter shall be eligible to run for election as a Pacifica City Councilmember and further providing that if for any reason a person serves a partial term as Pacfica City Councilmember in excess of two years, that partial term shall be considered a full term for purposes of the term limit provision?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6741, "no_votes": 6470, "total_votes": 13211, "percent_yes": 51.02566, "percent_no": 48.97434, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.047847", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.181398", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be adopted providing prospectively that no person who has served two terms of office as a Pacifica City Councilmembter shall be eligible to run for election as a Pacifica City Councilmember and further providing that if for any reason a person serves a partial term as Pacfica City Councilmember in excess of two years, that partial term shall be considered a full term for purposes of the term limit provision?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6581, "fingerprint": "2010|201000082|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000082|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "cc2f36fb62a6601f", "measure_id": "201000082", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan/Local Coastal Land Use Plan of the City of Carpinteria be amended and a Specific plan adopted to authorize development of the Paredon Project, a private development project to explore, develop, produce and gather offshore and onshore oil and natural gas resources and transmit them to the Carpinteria Oil and Gas processing Facilitiy operated by Venoco, Inc.?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1174, "no_votes": 2870, "total_votes": 4044, "percent_yes": 29.030663, "percent_no": 70.969337, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.050310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.182862", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan/Local Coastal Land Use Plan of the City of Carpinteria be amended and a Specific plan adopted to authorize development of the Paredon Project, a private development project to explore, develop, produce and gather offshore and onshore oil and natural gas resources and transmit them to the Carpinteria Oil and Gas processing Facilitiy operated by Venoco, Inc.?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6580, "fingerprint": "2010|201000046|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000046|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "2c321135ba27a7bc", "measure_id": "201000046", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance to continue Section 32-12 of the Santa Barbara County Code to sustain the current transient occupancy tax rate or ten percent (10%) upon transients occupying defined hotels located only within the unincorporated area of Santa Barbara County be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54169, "no_votes": 21528, "total_votes": 75697, "percent_yes": 71.5603, "percent_no": 28.439700000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.049975", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.182678", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance to continue Section 32-12 of the Santa Barbara County Code to sustain the current transient occupancy tax rate or ten percent (10%) upon transients occupying defined hotels located only within the unincorporated area of Santa Barbara County be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6582, "fingerprint": "2010|201000122|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000122|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d58116d4fd3eddfe", "measure_id": "201000122", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Hope School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and improve facilities, increasing student access to computers and modern technology, providing comparable school libraries, and installing solar panels to qualify for over $900,000 in savings and reimbursements and reduce operating costs, by issuing $8,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided bonds are only issued with NO estimated increase in tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3278, "no_votes": 1468, "total_votes": 4746, "percent_yes": 69.06869, "percent_no": 30.931309999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.050582", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.183046", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Hope School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and improve facilities, increasing student access to computers and modern technology, providing comparable school libraries, and installing solar panels to qualify for over $900,000 in savings and reimbursements and reduce operating costs, by issuing $8,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided bonds are only issued with NO estimated increase in tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6584, "fingerprint": "2010|201000354|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000354|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "201000354", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 441, "no_votes": 449, "total_votes": 890, "percent_yes": 49.550563, "percent_no": 50.449437, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.051180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.183418", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6585, "fingerprint": "2010|201000355|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000355|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "52c2b76f860c5892", "measure_id": "201000355", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve, enhance and improve the infrastructure, safety and character of Guadalupe, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the City of Guadalupe utility users tax from 5 percent to 7.5 percent for a period of six years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 251, "no_votes": 670, "total_votes": 921, "percent_yes": 27.252987, "percent_no": 72.747013, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.051503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.183604", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve, enhance and improve the infrastructure, safety and character of Guadalupe, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the City of Guadalupe utility users tax from 5 percent to 7.5 percent for a period of six years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6588, "fingerprint": "2010|201000452|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000452|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "910c8a9bb9dcd072", "measure_id": "201000452", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve quality of local education, shall the Santa Barbara Secondary/High School District provide adequate classrooms, science labs, technology, and libraries; repair/replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation, infrastructure systems and deteriorated portable classrooms; fix leaing roofs; improve disabled student access; and improve educational academy and career technology facilities by issuing $75,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with no money for administrator salaries and with oversight by a citizens' committee ensuring funds are spent on local school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41893, "no_votes": 18344, "total_votes": 60237, "percent_yes": 69.54695600000001, "percent_no": 30.45304399999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.052314", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.184172", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve quality of local education, shall the Santa Barbara Secondary/High School District provide adequate classrooms, science labs, technology, and libraries; repair/replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation, infrastructure systems and deteriorated portable classrooms; fix leaing roofs; improve disabled student access; and improve educational academy and career technology facilities by issuing $75,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with no money for administrator salaries and with oversight by a citizens' committee ensuring funds are spent on local school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6587, "fingerprint": "2010|201000451|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000451|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "bb3ff50370baf279", "measure_id": "201000451", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local education, shall the Santa Barbara Elmentary School District provide adequate classrooms, science labs, technology, and libraries at all schools; repair/replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation, infrastructure systems and deteriorated portable classrooms; fix leaking roofs; and improve disabled student access by issuing $35,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with no money for administrator salaries and with oversight by a citizens' committee to ensure funds are spent only on local school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18701, "no_votes": 7407, "total_votes": 26108, "percent_yes": 71.62939, "percent_no": 28.37061, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.052046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.183980", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local education, shall the Santa Barbara Elmentary School District provide adequate classrooms, science labs, technology, and libraries at all schools; repair/replace outdated electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation, infrastructure systems and deteriorated portable classrooms; fix leaking roofs; and improve disabled student access by issuing $35,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with no money for administrator salaries and with oversight by a citizens' committee to ensure funds are spent only on local school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6583, "fingerprint": "2010|201000180|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000180|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "db40e547c03ff440", "measure_id": "201000180", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Santa Barbara Ordinance to strengthen front-line law enforcement and fire protection within the County of Santa Barbara and Buellton, Carpinteria, Goleta, Guadalupe, Lompoc, Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, and Solvang and Carpinteria-Summerland, Montecito and County Fire District, construct and operate a 304-bed jail, repair existing correctional infrastructure, and fund repeat offender reduction efforts and alternatives-to-incarceration, with a 1/2 percent Transactions (Sales) and Use Tax increase beginning 7/01/2011 through 6/30/2025, and advisory committee oversight be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46673, "no_votes": 72281, "total_votes": 118954, "percent_yes": 39.236176, "percent_no": 60.763824, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.050852", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.183233", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Santa Barbara Ordinance to strengthen front-line law enforcement and fire protection within the County of Santa Barbara and Buellton, Carpinteria, Goleta, Guadalupe, Lompoc, Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, and Solvang and Carpinteria-Summerland, Montecito and County Fire District, construct and operate a 304-bed jail, repair existing correctional infrastructure, and fund repeat offender reduction efforts and alternatives-to-incarceration, with a 1/2 percent Transactions (Sales) and Use Tax increase beginning 7/01/2011 through 6/30/2025, and advisory committee oversight be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6586, "fingerprint": "2010|201000356|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000356|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "e37332327e84b7cf", "measure_id": "201000356", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance to amend the City\u2019s Zoning Ordinance to prohibit the operation or maintenance of storefront medical marijuana dispensaries within the City of Santa Barbara be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10942, "no_votes": 16992, "total_votes": 27934, "percent_yes": 39.170903, "percent_no": 60.829097, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.051776", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.183788", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance to amend the City\u2019s Zoning Ordinance to prohibit the operation or maintenance of storefront medical marijuana dispensaries within the City of Santa Barbara be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11515, "fingerprint": "2010|201000181|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000181|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "fc46aaada67b89c9", "measure_id": "201000181", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To protect and maintain children's health and prevent serious illnesses through regular medical checkups, immunizations, and early detection; to reduce costs from unnecessary emergency room use; and to prevent elimination of insurance coverage for low-income children of working families; shall Santa Clara County enact a $29 dollar annual parcel tax; limited to 10 years; with independent citizens oversight, full public disclosure of all spending, and subject to audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 279844, "no_votes": 196397, "total_votes": 476241, "percent_yes": 58.761007, "percent_no": 41.238993, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.196677", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.056796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.186951", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect and maintain children's health and prevent serious illnesses through regular medical checkups, immunizations, and early detection; to reduce costs from unnecessary emergency room use; and to prevent elimination of insurance coverage for low-income children of working families; shall Santa Clara County enact a $29 dollar annual parcel tax; limited to 10 years; with independent citizens oversight, full public disclosure of all spending, and subject to audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11512, "fingerprint": "2010|201000127|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000127|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e487abc0265da66f", "measure_id": "201000127", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Local High School Improvement Measure. Without increasing current tax rates, shall Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District add classrooms and science labs to prevent student overcrowding, improve instructional technology to support academic programs, lower energy costs by upgrading heating, ventilation, electrical and other systems, improve/add student safety systems, repair, construct and acquire school facilities and equipment, by issuing $41,300,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with all expenditures subject to independent citizens' oversight.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19480, "no_votes": 5587, "total_votes": 25067, "percent_yes": 77.71173, "percent_no": 22.288269999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.196030", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.055933", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.186394", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Local High School Improvement Measure. Without increasing current tax rates, shall Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District add classrooms and science labs to prevent student overcrowding, improve instructional technology to support academic programs, lower energy costs by upgrading heating, ventilation, electrical and other systems, improve/add student safety systems, repair, construct and acquire school facilities and equipment, by issuing $41,300,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with all expenditures subject to independent citizens' oversight.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6592, "fingerprint": "2010|201000025|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000025|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d89ba06c9dc42d29", "measure_id": "201000025", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve excellence in core academic programs, including reading, writing, math, and science; reduce the impact of deep budget cuts with stable locally-controlled funding; minimize teacher layoffs and class size increases; continue teacher professinoal development; and help protect critical high school electives, including arts and music, shall Palo Alto Unified School District renew its expiring parcel tax for six years, increase the rate by $96, with an exemption for seniors, annual two percent escalation adjustments, and independent oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16342, "no_votes": 4231, "total_votes": 20573, "percent_yes": 79.43421000000001, "percent_no": 20.565789999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.053496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.184934", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve excellence in core academic programs, including reading, writing, math, and science; reduce the impact of deep budget cuts with stable locally-controlled funding; minimize teacher layoffs and class size increases; continue teacher professinoal development; and help protect critical high school electives, including arts and music, shall Palo Alto Unified School District renew its expiring parcel tax for six years, increase the rate by $96, with an exemption for seniors, annual two percent escalation adjustments, and independent oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11511, "fingerprint": "2010|201000126|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000126|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cb4ebaa424601e61", "measure_id": "201000126", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Milpitas Unified School District high quality educatin and local control measure. To help protect local school from state budget cuts; provide revenue to stabilize local school funding; help maintain existing math, science, engineering, arts, music, athletic programs and smaller class sizes; and help prevent reduction in classroom instruction days, shall the Milpitas Unified School District assess an annual parcel tax of $84 for 5 years, with annual audits, exemptions for senior citizens, no money for district office administrators, and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7002, "no_votes": 2889, "total_votes": 9891, "percent_yes": 70.791626, "percent_no": 29.208374000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.195844", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.055647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.186214", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Milpitas Unified School District high quality educatin and local control measure. To help protect local school from state budget cuts; provide revenue to stabilize local school funding; help maintain existing math, science, engineering, arts, music, athletic programs and smaller class sizes; and help prevent reduction in classroom instruction days, shall the Milpitas Unified School District assess an annual parcel tax of $84 for 5 years, with annual audits, exemptions for senior citizens, no money for district office administrators, and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6589, "fingerprint": "2010|201000022|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000022|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f0718572d98147b0", "measure_id": "201000022", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide, stable, local funds needed to protect teaching positions, and assure the Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook, and Monte Vista High School District renew its existing, expiring parcel tax with a tax at the same annual rate of $98 per parcel for six years commencing July 1, 2010, with all funds benefiting local high schools, and offering an exemption to seniors and the disabled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28613, "no_votes": 10874, "total_votes": 39487, "percent_yes": 72.461826, "percent_no": 27.538173999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.052656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.184358", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide, stable, local funds needed to protect teaching positions, and assure the Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook, and Monte Vista High School District renew its existing, expiring parcel tax with a tax at the same annual rate of $98 per parcel for six years commencing July 1, 2010, with all funds benefiting local high schools, and offering an exemption to seniors and the disabled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11514, "fingerprint": "2010|201000129|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000129|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8558f0532cb8a85a", "measure_id": "201000129", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the Oak Grove School District voters in 1991 be continued for four years, allowing the District to continue to expend funds generated by the existing special tax of $68 per parcel for remedial services, repair of school buildings and grounds, purchase of instructional supplies and equipment, installation of energy conservation equipment, and restoration of services reduced in prior years in the library, counseling, custodial and maintenance areas?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11890, "no_votes": 4376, "total_votes": 16266, "percent_yes": 73.09725999999999, "percent_no": 26.90274000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.196489", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.056523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.186764", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the Oak Grove School District voters in 1991 be continued for four years, allowing the District to continue to expend funds generated by the existing special tax of $68 per parcel for remedial services, repair of school buildings and grounds, purchase of instructional supplies and equipment, installation of energy conservation equipment, and restoration of services reduced in prior years in the library, counseling, custodial and maintenance areas?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6590, "fingerprint": "2010|201000023|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000023|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "eab71a9fa6b17485", "measure_id": "201000023", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education and small class sizes for all students in Lakeside Joint School district, and provide qualified teachers with specialized training, comprehensive science programs, updated classroom technology, and quality academic programs for middle school students, shall the Lakeside Joint School District be authorized to implement an annual education parcel tax of $311 for seven years, with citizen oversight, and exemption available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, and every dollar spent on Lakeside students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 517, "no_votes": 252, "total_votes": 769, "percent_yes": 67.23017, "percent_no": 32.76983, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.052958", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.184541", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education and small class sizes for all students in Lakeside Joint School district, and provide qualified teachers with specialized training, comprehensive science programs, updated classroom technology, and quality academic programs for middle school students, shall the Lakeside Joint School District be authorized to implement an annual education parcel tax of $311 for seven years, with citizen oversight, and exemption available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, and every dollar spent on Lakeside students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11517, "fingerprint": "2010|201000455|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000455|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "39ad26bf18e00676", "measure_id": "201000455", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect Foothill College/De Anza College from State budget cuts, provide local funding that cannot be taken by the State, preserve affordable, quality education for students, including: Core academic classes including math, science and writing; Training for careers in healthcare, nursing, paramedics, technology, engineering and sciences; and Preparing students to transfer to 4-year universities, Shall Foothill - De Anza Community College District levy $69 per parcel annually for six years with citizen oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73404, "no_votes": 53162, "total_votes": 126566, "percent_yes": 57.99662, "percent_no": 42.00338, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.199436", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.060788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.189658", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect Foothill College/De Anza College from State budget cuts, provide local funding that cannot be taken by the State, preserve affordable, quality education for students, including: Core academic classes including math, science and writing; Training for careers in healthcare, nursing, paramedics, technology, engineering and sciences; and Preparing students to transfer to 4-year universities, Shall Foothill - De Anza Community College District levy $69 per parcel annually for six years with citizen oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6597, "fingerprint": "2010|201000125|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000125|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d7174d09341109ef", "measure_id": "201000125", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To accommodate increasing student enrollment and continue modernizing elementary and middle schools in the Los Gatos Union School District by creating additional classrooms and school facilites to avoid overcrowding: providing science labs; improving energy efficiency and fire safety; replacing aging portable classrooms and infrastructure; and improving student access to information technology; shall the Los Gatos Union School District be authorized to issue $30.9 million in general obligation bonds subject to an annual audit and with an independent citizens' ovesight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6412, "no_votes": 2554, "total_votes": 8966, "percent_yes": 71.51461, "percent_no": 28.485389999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.055266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.186033", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To accommodate increasing student enrollment and continue modernizing elementary and middle schools in the Los Gatos Union School District by creating additional classrooms and school facilites to avoid overcrowding: providing science labs; improving energy efficiency and fire safety; replacing aging portable classrooms and infrastructure; and improving student access to information technology; shall the Los Gatos Union School District be authorized to issue $30.9 million in general obligation bonds subject to an annual audit and with an independent citizens' ovesight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11520, "fingerprint": "2010|201000458|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000458|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5216d0e7765cf168", "measure_id": "201000458", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare San Jose City College/Evergreen College students for good paying jobs and transfer to four-year colleges, shall San Jose Evergreen Community College District upgrade, acquire, construct energy-efficient, technology-driven teaching classrooms, labs, sites, facilities equipment for health/ science, general education/ job-training, upgrade outdated electrical, plumbing, heating/ ventilation systems, by issuing $268 million in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for mathcing funds, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 111032, "no_votes": 77759, "total_votes": 188791, "percent_yes": 58.812124, "percent_no": 41.187876, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.200153", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.061616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.190197", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare San Jose City College/Evergreen College students for good paying jobs and transfer to four-year colleges, shall San Jose Evergreen Community College District upgrade, acquire, construct energy-efficient, technology-driven teaching classrooms, labs, sites, facilities equipment for health/ science, general education/ job-training, upgrade outdated electrical, plumbing, heating/ ventilation systems, by issuing $268 million in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for mathcing funds, with citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries, all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11510, "fingerprint": "2010|201000124|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000124|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0073f7071604abfe", "measure_id": "201000124", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe, modern schools by reparing leaky roofs; prviding disabled access; upgrading wiring, electrical, fire alarm and security systems; improving energy efficiency; replacing failing heating and cooling systems; upgrading computer learning technology; and constructing and equipping classrooms and facilites, shall Campbell Union Elementary School District issue $150 million in bonds under a no-tax-rate-increas financing plan, at lawful interest rates, with citizen oversight and independent audits, and using no funds for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12753, "no_votes": 4484, "total_votes": 17237, "percent_yes": 73.98619, "percent_no": 26.013810000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.195468", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.054926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.185854", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe, modern schools by reparing leaky roofs; prviding disabled access; upgrading wiring, electrical, fire alarm and security systems; improving energy efficiency; replacing failing heating and cooling systems; upgrading computer learning technology; and constructing and equipping classrooms and facilites, shall Campbell Union Elementary School District issue $150 million in bonds under a no-tax-rate-increas financing plan, at lawful interest rates, with citizen oversight and independent audits, and using no funds for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6591, "fingerprint": "2010|201000024|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000024|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "17646c703cce93be", "measure_id": "201000024", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain qualified and experienced teachers, keep schools safe and clean, maintain high quality academics, including reading, writing, math, and science, continue a well-rounded education including Spanish, art, and other educational enrichment programs, maintain updated computer technology, and maintain small class sizes, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District authorize an annual school parcel tax of $95 per parcel for four years, with an exemption for seniors, no funds used for administrator's salaries, and every dollar staying in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1008, "no_votes": 532, "total_votes": 1540, "percent_yes": 65.45454000000001, "percent_no": 34.54545999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.053227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.184727", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain qualified and experienced teachers, keep schools safe and clean, maintain high quality academics, including reading, writing, math, and science, continue a well-rounded education including Spanish, art, and other educational enrichment programs, maintain updated computer technology, and maintain small class sizes, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District authorize an annual school parcel tax of $95 per parcel for four years, with an exemption for seniors, no funds used for administrator's salaries, and every dollar staying in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11521, "fingerprint": "2010|201000459|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000459|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e6f97fbdbdae1c01", "measure_id": "201000459", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade school fire, safety and security systems, renovate and reopen closed schools, install solar panels to decrease energy costs and save money for classrooms, acquire sites for future schools and expand overcrowded schools; shall the Santa Clara Unified School District issue $81.1 million in general obligation bonds, at  interest rates within legal limits, subject to an annual audit and with an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21839, "no_votes": 12051, "total_votes": 33890, "percent_yes": 64.44084, "percent_no": 35.559160000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.200386", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.061882", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.190377", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade school fire, safety and security systems, renovate and reopen closed schools, install solar panels to decrease energy costs and save money for classrooms, acquire sites for future schools and expand overcrowded schools; shall the Santa Clara Unified School District issue $81.1 million in general obligation bonds, at  interest rates within legal limits, subject to an annual audit and with an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11513, "fingerprint": "2010|201000128|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000128|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b707c23a96d3b9d8", "measure_id": "201000128", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Continue improving the quality of local elementary schools by protecting reading, math and science programs, restoring libraries, music/art, retaining qualified teachers, including those for students with special needs and tutoring programs, maintaining updated classroom materials/computer technology, and reduce class size, shall Mount Pleasant Elementary School District levy an annual education tax of $95 per parcel for five years with an exemption for seniors, no funds for administrator's salaries, independent citizen oversight and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2099, "no_votes": 842, "total_votes": 2941, "percent_yes": 71.37028, "percent_no": 28.629720000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.196299", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.056227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.186581", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Continue improving the quality of local elementary schools by protecting reading, math and science programs, restoring libraries, music/art, retaining qualified teachers, including those for students with special needs and tutoring programs, maintaining updated classroom materials/computer technology, and reduce class size, shall Mount Pleasant Elementary School District levy an annual education tax of $95 per parcel for five years with an exemption for seniors, no funds for administrator's salaries, independent citizen oversight and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6593, "fingerprint": "2010|201000026|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000026|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "096cb2ae51aea783", "measure_id": "201000026", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high academic achievement for local Union Elementary School District students by protecting strong academic programs like English, math and science, retaining qualified teachers, keeping schools safe, providing classroom materials and technology and helping maintain small class sizes, shall Union Elementary School District authorize an annual education parcel tax of $96 per parcel for 6 years, exempting seniors, and gauranteeing: no use of funds for administrator salaries; independent oversight and annual audits; and every dollar staying in our local schools.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8233, "no_votes": 3133, "total_votes": 11366, "percent_yes": 72.43533, "percent_no": 27.564670000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.053762", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.185124", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high academic achievement for local Union Elementary School District students by protecting strong academic programs like English, math and science, retaining qualified teachers, keeping schools safe, providing classroom materials and technology and helping maintain small class sizes, shall Union Elementary School District authorize an annual education parcel tax of $96 per parcel for 6 years, exempting seniors, and gauranteeing: no use of funds for administrator salaries; independent oversight and annual audits; and every dollar staying in our local schools.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11516, "fingerprint": "2010|201000454|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000454|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4efd079efb163908", "measure_id": "201000454", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain and attract excellent teachers and suport staff, increase student access to science, technology, math and core academic classes required for college admission and careers, keep guidance counselors, continue to fund art, music and athletics and keep our schools safe and secure, shall the East Side Union High School District be authorized to levy $98 per parcel annually for six years with citizen oversight, an exemption for seniors, no money for administrator salaries, and guaranteed local control of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63866, "no_votes": 47465, "total_votes": 111331, "percent_yes": 57.36587, "percent_no": 42.63413, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.199200", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.060515", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.189473", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain and attract excellent teachers and suport staff, increase student access to science, technology, math and core academic classes required for college admission and careers, keep guidance counselors, continue to fund art, music and athletics and keep our schools safe and secure, shall the East Side Union High School District be authorized to levy $98 per parcel annually for six years with citizen oversight, an exemption for seniors, no money for administrator salaries, and guaranteed local control of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6596, "fingerprint": "2010|201000123|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000123|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "04fc8a26d941a7a8", "measure_id": "201000123", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect local schools from budget cuts, provide stable funding that cannot be taken away by the State, and preserve quality education by maintaining reading, math and science programs; attracting and retaining qualified teachers and school counselors; keeping school libraries open; and maintaining small K-3 class sizes; shall Alum Rock Union Elementary School District increase its expiring parcel tax by $48.00 per parcel for 5 years, with annual adjustments for inflation, independent citizen oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8173, "no_votes": 2812, "total_votes": 10985, "percent_yes": 74.401456, "percent_no": 25.598544000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.054650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.185675", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect local schools from budget cuts, provide stable funding that cannot be taken away by the State, and preserve quality education by maintaining reading, math and science programs; attracting and retaining qualified teachers and school counselors; keeping school libraries open; and maintaining small K-3 class sizes; shall Alum Rock Union Elementary School District increase its expiring parcel tax by $48.00 per parcel for 5 years, with annual adjustments for inflation, independent citizen oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11518, "fingerprint": "2010|201000456|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000456|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6d8988db15c8b2ce", "measure_id": "201000456", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe, modern neighborhood schools with updated computer technology, maximize energy efficiency to save money, improve student learning for local elementary school students by acquiring, upgrading, constructing, equipping classrooms, sites/facilites, science/computer labs, replacing aging roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation/electrical systems, improving fire alarms, school security/earthquake safety, shall Franklin-McKinley School District issue $50,000,000 of bonds, with independent oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10860, "no_votes": 4674, "total_votes": 15534, "percent_yes": 69.911164, "percent_no": 30.088836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.199677", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.061069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.189837", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe, modern neighborhood schools with updated computer technology, maximize energy efficiency to save money, improve student learning for local elementary school students by acquiring, upgrading, constructing, equipping classrooms, sites/facilites, science/computer labs, replacing aging roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation/electrical systems, improving fire alarms, school security/earthquake safety, shall Franklin-McKinley School District issue $50,000,000 of bonds, with independent oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6595, "fingerprint": "2010|201000084|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000084|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "230da7da0a0e921b", "measure_id": "201000084", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Clara adopt Ordinance 17.20 leasing City property for a professional football stadium and other events; no use of City General or Enterprise funds for construction; no new taxes for residents for stadium; Redevelopment Agency funds capped for construction; private party pays all construction cost overruns; no City/Agency obligation for stadium operating/maintenance; private party payment of projected fair market rent; and additional funds for senior/youth/library/recreation to City's General Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14628, "no_votes": 10505, "total_votes": 25133, "percent_yes": 58.20236, "percent_no": 41.79764, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.054382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.185491", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Clara adopt Ordinance 17.20 leasing City property for a professional football stadium and other events; no use of City General or Enterprise funds for construction; no new taxes for residents for stadium; Redevelopment Agency funds capped for construction; private party pays all construction cost overruns; no City/Agency obligation for stadium operating/maintenance; private party payment of projected fair market rent; and additional funds for senior/youth/library/recreation to City's General Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11519, "fingerprint": "2010|201000457|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000457|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "987f63a13702838c", "measure_id": "201000457", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing current tax rates and to continue providing high quality education for local students by upgrading science labs, updating computer learning technology, maximizing energy efficiency and water conservation to save money, acquiring, constructing, repairing, equipping classrooms /sites /facilities /equipment, upgrading fire and security systems, and improving disabled access, shall Moreland Elementary School District issue $55,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators' salaries and all funds staying in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9035, "no_votes": 4031, "total_votes": 13066, "percent_yes": 69.148934, "percent_no": 30.851066000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.199917", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.061337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.190017", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing current tax rates and to continue providing high quality education for local students by upgrading science labs, updating computer learning technology, maximizing energy efficiency and water conservation to save money, acquiring, constructing, repairing, equipping classrooms /sites /facilities /equipment, upgrading fire and security systems, and improving disabled access, shall Moreland Elementary School District issue $55,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrators' salaries and all funds staying in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6594, "fingerprint": "2010|201000083|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000083|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "294d3455a5ccfffe", "measure_id": "201000083", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the Cardroom Tax rate on gross revenues from 13% to 15%, increase the number of cardroom tables by 18, permit any card game authorized under State law consistent with City regulations and betting limits as authorized under State law, all subject to City audit and oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 109197, "no_votes": 34412, "total_votes": 143609, "percent_yes": 76.03771, "percent_no": 23.962289999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.054114", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.185309", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the Cardroom Tax rate on gross revenues from 13% to 15%, increase the number of cardroom tables by 18, permit any card game authorized under State law consistent with City regulations and betting limits as authorized under State law, all subject to City audit and oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6609, "fingerprint": "2010|201000453|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000453|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "56c886b97c28fcc6", "measure_id": "201000453", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high academic achievement for local students by providing strong core and accelerated academic programs like reading, writing, science and math, retaining quality teachers and supporting smaller class sizes, improving access to computers, technology, and libraries, shall Cambrian Elementary School District authorize an education parcel tax of $96 per year per parcel for six years, with citizen oversight, an exemption available for seniors, no funds used for administrators' salaries, and every dollar staying in our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5843, "no_votes": 4160, "total_votes": 10003, "percent_yes": 58.412474, "percent_no": 41.587526, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.060211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.189289", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high academic achievement for local students by providing strong core and accelerated academic programs like reading, writing, science and math, retaining quality teachers and supporting smaller class sizes, improving access to computers, technology, and libraries, shall Cambrian Elementary School District authorize an education parcel tax of $96 per year per parcel for six years, with citizen oversight, an exemption available for seniors, no funds used for administrators' salaries, and every dollar staying in our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6598, "fingerprint": "2010|201000357|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000357|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3fb06e95bfd40e5c", "measure_id": "201000357", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain/protect city services, including 911 emergency response times, firefighters, police patrols, crime prevention, city streets and pothole repair, after-school programs for children/teens and senior programs, shall the City of Campbell modify the existing business license tax set in 1982, with the cost for most businesses increasing $50 and limiting annual cost-of-living adjustments to 2%, with proceeds placed in the City's General Fund for local use and with independent annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8852, "no_votes": 3869, "total_votes": 12721, "percent_yes": 69.58572, "percent_no": 30.414280000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.057069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.187133", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/protect city services, including 911 emergency response times, firefighters, police patrols, crime prevention, city streets and pothole repair, after-school programs for children/teens and senior programs, shall the City of Campbell modify the existing business license tax set in 1982, with the cost for most businesses increasing $50 and limiting annual cost-of-living adjustments to 2%, with proceeds placed in the City's General Fund for local use and with independent annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6599, "fingerprint": "2010|201000358|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000358|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c3308349155259f1", "measure_id": "201000358", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help prevent additional budget cuts and maintain/protect city services, including 911 emergency response times, firefighters, police patrols, crime prevention, city streets and pothole repair, after-school programs for children/teens and nutrition programs for seniors, shall the City of Campbell increase the existing transient occupancy tax charged to hotel guests from 10% to 12% with proceeds placed in the City's General Fund for local use and with independent annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9254, "no_votes": 3395, "total_votes": 12649, "percent_yes": 73.159933, "percent_no": 26.840067000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.057339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.187313", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help prevent additional budget cuts and maintain/protect city services, including 911 emergency response times, firefighters, police patrols, crime prevention, city streets and pothole repair, after-school programs for children/teens and nutrition programs for seniors, shall the City of Campbell increase the existing transient occupancy tax charged to hotel guests from 10% to 12% with proceeds placed in the City's General Fund for local use and with independent annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6600, "fingerprint": "2010|201000359|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000359|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "201000359", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6622, "no_votes": 4944, "total_votes": 11566, "percent_yes": 57.25402, "percent_no": 42.74598, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.057607", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.187496", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6601, "fingerprint": "2010|201000360|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000360|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "201000360", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5158, "no_votes": 6062, "total_votes": 11220, "percent_yes": 45.97148, "percent_no": 54.02852, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.057871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.187820", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6608, "fingerprint": "2010|201000367|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000367|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8f1891f99b485b82", "measure_id": "201000367", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Saratoga adopt an ordinance setting a two-story limit for buidlings on land in Comercial and Professional and Administrative Office zoning districts in the City and requiring voter approval of any future change to the two-story limit on those lands?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6939, "no_votes": 7143, "total_votes": 14082, "percent_yes": 49.275672, "percent_no": 50.724328, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.059906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.189106", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Saratoga adopt an ordinance setting a two-story limit for buidlings on land in Comercial and Professional and Administrative Office zoning districts in the City and requiring voter approval of any future change to the two-story limit on those lands?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6603, "fingerprint": "2010|201000362|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000362|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "89c8522b9ae8ed67", "measure_id": "201000362", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the City to continuously maintain in all budgetary years at least the number of Fire Department Personnel authorized in the 2009-10 Annual Budget, and to prohibit the City from implementing any proposal to reduce fire staffing levels or close or relocate a fire station unless the City Council holds two public hearings, submits the measure to voters, and a majority of voters approve the proposal?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6567, "no_votes": 19906, "total_votes": 26473, "percent_yes": 24.806407, "percent_no": 75.19359299999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.058460", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.188200", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the City to continuously maintain in all budgetary years at least the number of Fire Department Personnel authorized in the 2009-10 Annual Budget, and to prohibit the City from implementing any proposal to reduce fire staffing levels or close or relocate a fire station unless the City Council holds two public hearings, submits the measure to voters, and a majority of voters approve the proposal?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6604, "fingerprint": "2010|201000363|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000363|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d29054654ce1db88", "measure_id": "201000363", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To consolidate with county and State elections and help reduce the City's election costs, shall Article III, section 3 of the Palo Alto City Charter be amended to change the City's general municipal elections to each even-numbered year, with the next election scheduled for 2012, and to extend the terms of all current council members by one year in order to complete the transition to even-numbered year elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19059, "no_votes": 6071, "total_votes": 25130, "percent_yes": 75.841624, "percent_no": 24.158376000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.058760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.188378", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To consolidate with county and State elections and help reduce the City's election costs, shall Article III, section 3 of the Palo Alto City Charter be amended to change the City's general municipal elections to each even-numbered year, with the next election scheduled for 2012, and to extend the terms of all current council members by one year in order to complete the transition to even-numbered year elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6602, "fingerprint": "2010|201000361|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000361|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "db2516e4538786a2", "measure_id": "201000361", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing the tax rate residents and businesses currently pay, shall the City of Mountain View adopt an ordinance to update its Utility Users Tax, that would ensure equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of telecommunications technology used and provide funds to preserve essential services including: fire protection; rapid emergency response and crime prevention; library hours and services; gang prevention programs; and maintenance of city parks, playgrounds and athletic fields; with independent audits and all revenue staying in Mountain View?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14993, "no_votes": 6393, "total_votes": 21386, "percent_yes": 70.10661400000001, "percent_no": 29.893385999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.058152", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.188017", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the tax rate residents and businesses currently pay, shall the City of Mountain View adopt an ordinance to update its Utility Users Tax, that would ensure equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of telecommunications technology used and provide funds to preserve essential services including: fire protection; rapid emergency response and crime prevention; library hours and services; gang prevention programs; and maintenance of city parks, playgrounds and athletic fields; with independent audits and all revenue staying in Mountain View?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6605, "fingerprint": "2010|201000364|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000364|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "dab7eba73b5b9026", "measure_id": "201000364", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to provide funding for essential City services such police, fire, emergency response, street maintenance, pothole repair, parks, libraries and youth and senior programs, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax at a rate of up to 10% of gross receipts on marijuana businesses in San Jose, subject to existing independent financial audits, with all revenue controlled by the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 184305, "no_votes": 50992, "total_votes": 235297, "percent_yes": 78.32866299999999, "percent_no": 21.67133700000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.059026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.188560", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide funding for essential City services such police, fire, emergency response, street maintenance, pothole repair, parks, libraries and youth and senior programs, shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a tax at a rate of up to 10% of gross receipts on marijuana businesses in San Jose, subject to existing independent financial audits, with all revenue controlled by the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6606, "fingerprint": "2010|201000365|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000365|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "09d9a6b031978619", "measure_id": "201000365", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide fiscal stability, control costs and maintain City services to residents, shall the Charter be amended to permit binding arbitration only if outside arbitrators are (1) required to base awards to employees primarily on the City's ability to pay; and (2) prohibited from; creating any unfunded liability for the City, increasing police and firefighter compensation more than the rate of increase in General Fund revenues, or granting retroactive benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 148368, "no_votes": 75038, "total_votes": 223406, "percent_yes": 66.411823, "percent_no": 33.588177, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.059291", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.188739", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide fiscal stability, control costs and maintain City services to residents, shall the Charter be amended to permit binding arbitration only if outside arbitrators are (1) required to base awards to employees primarily on the City's ability to pay; and (2) prohibited from; creating any unfunded liability for the City, increasing police and firefighter compensation more than the rate of increase in General Fund revenues, or granting retroactive benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6607, "fingerprint": "2010|201000366|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000366|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "13ec05a9f50a7e11", "measure_id": "201000366", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide fiscal stability, control costs and maintain City Services to residents, shall the Charter be amended to allow the Council, by ordinance and subject to the requirements of applicable law, to exclude any officer or employee hired on or after the ordinance's effective date from any retirement plan or benefit of any plan then in existence and to require that any new or different plan shall be actuarially sound?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 162367, "no_votes": 62710, "total_votes": 225077, "percent_yes": 72.13842, "percent_no": 27.861580000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.059631", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.188917", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide fiscal stability, control costs and maintain City Services to residents, shall the Charter be amended to allow the Council, by ordinance and subject to the requirements of applicable law, to exclude any officer or employee hired on or after the ordinance's effective date from any retirement plan or benefit of any plan then in existence and to require that any new or different plan shall be actuarially sound?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6610, "fingerprint": "2010|201000027|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000027|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "954b7517c80466ff", "measure_id": "201000027", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education and small class sizes for all students in Lakeside Joint School District, and provide qualified teachers with specialized, comprehensive science programs, updated classroom technology, and quality academic programs for middle school students, shall the Lakeside Joint School District be authorized to implement an annual education parcel tax of $311 for seven years, with citizen oversight, an exemption available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, and every dollar spent on Lakeside students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 371, "no_votes": 169, "total_votes": 540, "percent_yes": 68.703705, "percent_no": 31.296295, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.062157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.190562", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education and small class sizes for all students in Lakeside Joint School District, and provide qualified teachers with specialized, comprehensive science programs, updated classroom technology, and quality academic programs for middle school students, shall the Lakeside Joint School District be authorized to implement an annual education parcel tax of $311 for seven years, with citizen oversight, an exemption available for senior citizens, no funds for administrators' salaries, and every dollar spent on Lakeside students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6611, "fingerprint": "2010|201000028|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000028|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "b0642d3575a174ff", "measure_id": "201000028", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain qualified and experienced teachers, keep schools safe and clean, maintain high quality academics, including reading,writing, math, and science, continue a well-rounded education including Spanish, art, and other educational enrichment programs, maintain updated computer technology, and maintain small class sizes, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District authorzie an annual school parcel tax of $95 per parcel for four years, with an exemption for seniors, no funds used for adminsitrator's salaries, and every dollar staying in local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 796, "no_votes": 439, "total_votes": 1235, "percent_yes": 64.45344, "percent_no": 35.54656, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-05-04", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.062598", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.190746", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain qualified and experienced teachers, keep schools safe and clean, maintain high quality academics, including reading,writing, math, and science, continue a well-rounded education including Spanish, art, and other educational enrichment programs, maintain updated computer technology, and maintain small class sizes, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District authorzie an annual school parcel tax of $95 per parcel for four years, with an exemption for seniors, no funds used for adminsitrator's salaries, and every dollar staying in local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6612, "fingerprint": "2010|201000368|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000368|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "55f9f34ec05b633a", "measure_id": "201000368", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the safety and quality of life of the City of Santa Cruz through City services--including law enforcement, fire protection, emergency medical response, park maintenance and youth programs--and to ensure that all taxpayers are treated fairly, shall the City's existing utility users tax be broadened to include changes in technology and laws, and increased by 1.5%, while including protections for low-income residents and seniors, and ensuring that all funds remain local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13942, "no_votes": 8096, "total_votes": 22038, "percent_yes": 63.26345, "percent_no": 36.73655, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.063221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.190926", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the safety and quality of life of the City of Santa Cruz through City services--including law enforcement, fire protection, emergency medical response, park maintenance and youth programs--and to ensure that all taxpayers are treated fairly, shall the City's existing utility users tax be broadened to include changes in technology and laws, and increased by 1.5%, while including protections for low-income residents and seniors, and ensuring that all funds remain local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6613, "fingerprint": "2010|201000460|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000460|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "451986fe0bccecb7", "measure_id": "201000460", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of public education, attract qualified teachers, provide up-to-date science labs/classrooms/technology without increasing current tax rates, shall Aromas San Juan Unified School District equip classrooms with effective heating and cooling systems, upgrade aging plumbing, lighting/electrical/acquire equipment, by issuing $9,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, no administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 18, "percent_yes": 66.66667, "percent_no": 33.333330000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.063736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.191109", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of public education, attract qualified teachers, provide up-to-date science labs/classrooms/technology without increasing current tax rates, shall Aromas San Juan Unified School District equip classrooms with effective heating and cooling systems, upgrade aging plumbing, lighting/electrical/acquire equipment, by issuing $9,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, no administrator salaries, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6614, "fingerprint": "2010|201000182|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000182|SHASTA", "content_hash": "59d72cefeeb06409", "measure_id": "201000182", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall GREG PETERSON be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of Mountain Gate Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 353, "no_votes": 364, "total_votes": 717, "percent_yes": 49.232915, "percent_no": 50.767085, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.064211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.191293", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall GREG PETERSON be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of Mountain Gate Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6615, "fingerprint": "2010|201000183|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000183|SHASTA", "content_hash": "cfb4050c5f266619", "measure_id": "201000183", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall CARY PARK be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of Mountain Gate Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 346, "no_votes": 359, "total_votes": 705, "percent_yes": 49.078014, "percent_no": 50.921986, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.064683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.191479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall CARY PARK be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of Mountain Gate Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6616, "fingerprint": "2010|201000369|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000369|SHASTA", "content_hash": "0208a41fc30a4d79", "measure_id": "201000369", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted making a labor negotiations policy providing that City employees and City officials pay the full employee contribution of CalPERS pension benefits to be phased in over a period not to exceed four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18761, "no_votes": 10447, "total_votes": 29208, "percent_yes": 64.232403, "percent_no": 35.767596999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.065135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.191664", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted making a labor negotiations policy providing that City employees and City officials pay the full employee contribution of CalPERS pension benefits to be phased in over a period not to exceed four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6617, "fingerprint": "2010|201000370|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000370|SHASTA", "content_hash": "80ced3b2c0d1b2bf", "measure_id": "201000370", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted making a labor negotiations policy that City contributions to retiree health care plan premiums be changed from no time requirement to a formula based on years of service with a minimum five-year vesting requirement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20361, "no_votes": 8990, "total_votes": 29351, "percent_yes": 69.37071999999999, "percent_no": 30.62928000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.065563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.191844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted making a labor negotiations policy that City contributions to retiree health care plan premiums be changed from no time requirement to a formula based on years of service with a minimum five-year vesting requirement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6618, "fingerprint": "2010|201000461|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000461|SHASTA", "content_hash": "d64eca706de42622", "measure_id": "201000461", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and facilties; upgrade inadequate plumbing, sewer and electrical systems; replace heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; make health/safety improvements; and improve energy efficiency; shall the Junction Elementary School District issue $3,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1025, "no_votes": 843, "total_votes": 1868, "percent_yes": 54.87152, "percent_no": 45.12848, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.065969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.192026", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and facilties; upgrade inadequate plumbing, sewer and electrical systems; replace heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; make health/safety improvements; and improve energy efficiency; shall the Junction Elementary School District issue $3,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6619, "fingerprint": "2010|201000462|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000462|SIERRA", "content_hash": "9e9d2576a06cb679", "measure_id": "201000462", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities, increase safety and improve energy efficiency in our schools and qualify for State matching grants, shall Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District issue $5 million in bonds, providing for a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, interest rates within legal limits, and no money for administrators' salaries or school operating expenses, in order to renovate existing school buildings, update utilities, science laboratories, windows, and furniture, with all money raised benefiting our local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 709, "no_votes": 1111, "total_votes": 1820, "percent_yes": 38.956043, "percent_no": 61.043957, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.066450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.192210", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities, increase safety and improve energy efficiency in our schools and qualify for State matching grants, shall Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District issue $5 million in bonds, providing for a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, interest rates within legal limits, and no money for administrators' salaries or school operating expenses, in order to renovate existing school buildings, update utilities, science laboratories, windows, and furniture, with all money raised benefiting our local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6622, "fingerprint": "2010|201000371|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000371|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "2614cc5c0675aa67", "measure_id": "201000371", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall PETER ARTH be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council, of the City of Dunsmuir?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 408, "no_votes": 327, "total_votes": 735, "percent_yes": 55.510205, "percent_no": 44.489795, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.067761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.192761", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall PETER ARTH be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council, of the City of Dunsmuir?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6623, "fingerprint": "2010|201000372|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000372|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "7ed895a6f7ec818b", "measure_id": "201000372", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall MARIO RUBINO be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council, of the City of Dunsmuir?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 397, "no_votes": 336, "total_votes": 733, "percent_yes": 54.16098, "percent_no": 45.83902, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.068237", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.192941", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall MARIO RUBINO be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council, of the City of Dunsmuir?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6624, "fingerprint": "2010|201000373|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000373|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "201000373", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 572, "no_votes": 653, "total_votes": 1225, "percent_yes": 46.693876, "percent_no": 53.306124, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.068701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.193127", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6625, "fingerprint": "2010|201000374|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000374|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "201000374", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 576, "no_votes": 647, "total_votes": 1223, "percent_yes": 47.0973, "percent_no": 52.9027, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.069121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.193309", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6620, "fingerprint": "2010|201000184|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000184|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "150c2ceda4607663", "measure_id": "201000184", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall there be an increase of two percent (2%) to the general tax for the privilege of transient occupancy in any hotel as defined in Title 8, Chapter 4 of the Siskiyou County Code, which increase would set the total transient occupancy tax at ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by the operator.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4471, "no_votes": 6225, "total_votes": 10696, "percent_yes": 41.800672, "percent_no": 58.199328, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.066934", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.192395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be an increase of two percent (2%) to the general tax for the privilege of transient occupancy in any hotel as defined in Title 8, Chapter 4 of the Siskiyou County Code, which increase would set the total transient occupancy tax at ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by the operator.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6626, "fingerprint": "2010|201000463|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000463|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "01437b5c1614d028", "measure_id": "201000463", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; repair leaky roofs; replace outdated plumbing and sewer systems; improve energy efficiency; modernize 50-year-old and older classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and improve student access to computers and modern technology;  shall the Scott Valley Unified School District issue $5,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 817, "no_votes": 1626, "total_votes": 2443, "percent_yes": 33.442488, "percent_no": 66.557512, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.069574", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.193492", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; repair leaky roofs; replace outdated plumbing and sewer systems; improve energy efficiency; modernize 50-year-old and older classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and improve student access to computers and modern technology;  shall the Scott Valley Unified School District issue $5,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6621, "fingerprint": "2010|201000185|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000185|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "847fa2358c3346f9", "measure_id": "201000185", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Klamath River dams (Iron Gate, Copco 1, and Copco 2) and associated hydroelectric facilities be removed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3640, "no_votes": 13564, "total_votes": 17204, "percent_yes": 21.157870000000003, "percent_no": 78.84213, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.067345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.192580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Klamath River dams (Iron Gate, Copco 1, and Copco 2) and associated hydroelectric facilities be removed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6627, "fingerprint": "2010|201000085|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000085|SOLANO", "content_hash": "257524781520eaba", "measure_id": "201000085", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 809 of the Charter of the City of Vallejo be repealed to remove the mediation/arbitration process, commonly referred to as binding interest arbitration, that permits an arbitrator, without City Council approval, to make the final decision to resolve disputes between the City and its recognized emplyee organizations on all matters relating to wages, hours, and working conditions and instead to use the method of resolving such disputes set forth in law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9314, "no_votes": 8856, "total_votes": 18170, "percent_yes": 51.260316, "percent_no": 48.739684, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.070062", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.193691", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 809 of the Charter of the City of Vallejo be repealed to remove the mediation/arbitration process, commonly referred to as binding interest arbitration, that permits an arbitrator, without City Council approval, to make the final decision to resolve disputes between the City and its recognized emplyee organizations on all matters relating to wages, hours, and working conditions and instead to use the method of resolving such disputes set forth in law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6630, "fingerprint": "2010|201000466|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000466|SOLANO", "content_hash": "d027d45449aa2271", "measure_id": "201000466", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To minimize the loss of teaching positions, increases in class sizes, cuts in reading, math and other programs and to provide students with high-quality classroom programs and student services, shall the Travis Unified School District be authorized beginning July 1, 2011 to levy a qualified special tax of $250 per taxable parcel per year for 3 years with exemptions for seniors and all expenditues reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2146, "no_votes": 2805, "total_votes": 4951, "percent_yes": 43.344778, "percent_no": 56.655222, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.071439", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.194249", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To minimize the loss of teaching positions, increases in class sizes, cuts in reading, math and other programs and to provide students with high-quality classroom programs and student services, shall the Travis Unified School District be authorized beginning July 1, 2011 to levy a qualified special tax of $250 per taxable parcel per year for 3 years with exemptions for seniors and all expenditues reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6628, "fingerprint": "2010|201000464|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000464|SOLANO", "content_hash": "d4dc2357460c38d8", "measure_id": "201000464", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To minimize the loss of teaching positions, increases in class sizes, cuts in reading, math and other programs; and to provide students with high-quality classroom programs and student services, shall the Benicia Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $58 per residence and $58 per parcel of commercial or industrial property, for 6 years with exemptions for seniors, and expenditures reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7390, "no_votes": 4263, "total_votes": 11653, "percent_yes": 63.41715, "percent_no": 36.58285, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.070534", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.193877", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To minimize the loss of teaching positions, increases in class sizes, cuts in reading, math and other programs; and to provide students with high-quality classroom programs and student services, shall the Benicia Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $58 per residence and $58 per parcel of commercial or industrial property, for 6 years with exemptions for seniors, and expenditures reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6629, "fingerprint": "2010|201000465|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000465|SOLANO", "content_hash": "d50319f346aeae2a", "measure_id": "201000465", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, repair, and improve classrooms and support facilities, including career technical and vocational facilities, increase student access to modern technology, provide utility and energy efficiency improvements, and purchase leased facilities to reduce operating costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Dixon Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $32,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no projected increase in overall tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2830, "no_votes": 3196, "total_votes": 6026, "percent_yes": 46.963158, "percent_no": 53.036842, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.070942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.194065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, repair, and improve classrooms and support facilities, including career technical and vocational facilities, increase student access to modern technology, provide utility and energy efficiency improvements, and purchase leased facilities to reduce operating costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Dixon Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $32,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no projected increase in overall tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11522, "fingerprint": "2010|201000468|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000468|SONOMA", "content_hash": "8956d91ad502df11", "measure_id": "201000468", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and improve Calistoga schools, improve school libraries, upgrade classrooms, modernize computer networks, build a new gym and cafeteria, install solar energy systems, replace aging roofs, old heating, electrical, plumbing, cooling and ventilation systems with energy efficient systems, shall the Calistoga Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $42,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries and all expenditures monitored by an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 184, "no_votes": 89, "total_votes": 273, "percent_yes": 67.39927, "percent_no": 32.60073, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.207088", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.077651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.196807", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and improve Calistoga schools, improve school libraries, upgrade classrooms, modernize computer networks, build a new gym and cafeteria, install solar energy systems, replace aging roofs, old heating, electrical, plumbing, cooling and ventilation systems with energy efficient systems, shall the Calistoga Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $42,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries and all expenditures monitored by an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6631, "fingerprint": "2010|201000017|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000017|SONOMA", "content_hash": "13e1b407e9e23960", "measure_id": "201000017", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent potential elmination of the Police Department; restore Police services to 2008 levels; maintain financial viablity of the City; prevent cuts to street paving, pothole repair, and park maintencance; restore City Hall service hours; and maintain other City services, shall the City of Cotati enact a one-half cent sales tax, which will sunset in 5 years, and be subject to annual financial audits and public expenditure reports?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1120, "no_votes": 750, "total_votes": 1870, "percent_yes": 59.89305, "percent_no": 40.10695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-04-13", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.071869", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.194430", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent potential elmination of the Police Department; restore Police services to 2008 levels; maintain financial viablity of the City; prevent cuts to street paving, pothole repair, and park maintencance; restore City Hall service hours; and maintain other City services, shall the City of Cotati enact a one-half cent sales tax, which will sunset in 5 years, and be subject to annual financial audits and public expenditure reports?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6634, "fingerprint": "2010|201000130|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000130|SONOMA", "content_hash": "bd3ab4496d3631d1", "measure_id": "201000130", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to improve locals schools and classrooms by making health and safety improvements to campuses, upgrading restrooms, plumbing, heating, ventilation and airconditioning systems, fixing leaking roofs, expanding student access to computers and technology, and removing or replacing outdated portables, shall Mark West Union School District be authorized to issue up to $14,000,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2372, "no_votes": 1622, "total_votes": 3994, "percent_yes": 59.389085, "percent_no": 40.610915, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.073240", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.194976", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to improve locals schools and classrooms by making health and safety improvements to campuses, upgrading restrooms, plumbing, heating, ventilation and airconditioning systems, fixing leaking roofs, expanding student access to computers and technology, and removing or replacing outdated portables, shall Mark West Union School District be authorized to issue up to $14,000,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6632, "fingerprint": "2010|201000047|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000047|SONOMA", "content_hash": "d7be2d1ac7aec836", "measure_id": "201000047", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Sonoma County Civil Service Ordinance be amended to: change the appointing responsiblity for the director of human resources from the Civil Service Commission to the Board of Supervisors; add the director of human resources to the list of unclassified employees; and allow the Board of Supervisors to amend the Ordinance without voter approval so long as amendments do not nullify the basic principles of the Civil Service System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50406, "no_votes": 56617, "total_votes": 107023, "percent_yes": 47.098288, "percent_no": 52.901712, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.072418", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.194615", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sonoma County Civil Service Ordinance be amended to: change the appointing responsiblity for the director of human resources from the Civil Service Commission to the Board of Supervisors; add the director of human resources to the list of unclassified employees; and allow the Board of Supervisors to amend the Ordinance without voter approval so long as amendments do not nullify the basic principles of the Civil Service System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6633, "fingerprint": "2010|201000086|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000086|SONOMA", "content_hash": "946409d9e7075663", "measure_id": "201000086", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the safety and character of Rohnert Park, and maintain and protect general City services, including essential services such as neighborhood police patrols; fire protection; 9-1-1 emergency response; gang and sex offender enforcement; disaster preparedness; street paving and pothole repair; park maintenance; and other essential services shall the City of Rohnert Park enact a one-half cent transaction (sales) and use tax for five years, subject to annual audits and public review, with no money for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4643, "no_votes": 3754, "total_votes": 8397, "percent_yes": 55.29356, "percent_no": 44.70644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.072832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.194794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the safety and character of Rohnert Park, and maintain and protect general City services, including essential services such as neighborhood police patrols; fire protection; 9-1-1 emergency response; gang and sex offender enforcement; disaster preparedness; street paving and pothole repair; park maintenance; and other essential services shall the City of Rohnert Park enact a one-half cent transaction (sales) and use tax for five years, subject to annual audits and public review, with no money for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6644, "fingerprint": "2010|201000469|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000469|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f158e9331a702801", "measure_id": "201000469", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; increase student access to computers and modern technology throughout the District; and upgrade inadequate electrical systems; shall the Cloverdale Unified School District issue $17,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and use No money for administrator or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2096, "no_votes": 1673, "total_votes": 3769, "percent_yes": 55.61157, "percent_no": 44.38843, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.078010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.197097", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; increase student access to computers and modern technology throughout the District; and upgrade inadequate electrical systems; shall the Cloverdale Unified School District issue $17,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and use No money for administrator or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6647, "fingerprint": "2010|201000472|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000472|SONOMA", "content_hash": "bb26f7526def314d", "measure_id": "201000472", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student achievement, college/job preparation and help prevent budget cuts by making neighborhood schools energy efficient with solar panels, energy efficient windows and water conservation improvements, allowing savings to improve classrooms; upgrading technology; and modernizing/equipping classrooms, career/technical education, libraries, and computer/science labs; shall Sonoma Valley Unified School District issue $40,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, under a no-tax-rate-increase financing plan, with annual audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10581, "no_votes": 5068, "total_votes": 15649, "percent_yes": 67.614543, "percent_no": 32.385457, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.079116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.197658", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student achievement, college/job preparation and help prevent budget cuts by making neighborhood schools energy efficient with solar panels, energy efficient windows and water conservation improvements, allowing savings to improve classrooms; upgrading technology; and modernizing/equipping classrooms, career/technical education, libraries, and computer/science labs; shall Sonoma Valley Unified School District issue $40,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, under a no-tax-rate-increase financing plan, with annual audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6649, "fingerprint": "2010|201000474|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000474|SONOMA", "content_hash": "dc44e48ade6c0d7c", "measure_id": "201000474", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels; modernize outdated classrooms and facilities; replace outdated heating ventilation and air conditioning systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and improve physical education fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the West Sonoma County Union High School District issue $23,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and use no money for administrator or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15375, "no_votes": 5068, "total_votes": 20443, "percent_yes": 75.209117, "percent_no": 24.790882999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.079678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.198025", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, improve energy efficiency by installing solar panels; modernize outdated classrooms and facilities; replace outdated heating ventilation and air conditioning systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; and improve physical education fields and facilities for school and community use; shall the West Sonoma County Union High School District issue $23,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and use no money for administrator or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6643, "fingerprint": "2010|201000467|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000467|SONOMA", "content_hash": "62fb39f14d9c50bc", "measure_id": "201000467", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate classrooms and facilities, replace leaky roofs, improve energy efficiency including installing solar panels, make health and safety improvements, replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems, improve physcial education fields, and upgrade electrical/technology systems, shall Bennett Valley Union School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities by issuing $10,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have No money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2976, "no_votes": 1756, "total_votes": 4732, "percent_yes": 62.89095, "percent_no": 37.10905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.077039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.196623", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate classrooms and facilities, replace leaky roofs, improve energy efficiency including installing solar panels, make health and safety improvements, replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems, improve physcial education fields, and upgrade electrical/technology systems, shall Bennett Valley Union School District acquire, construct, repair, equip school facilities by issuing $10,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have No money used for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6645, "fingerprint": "2010|201000470|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000470|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ff54933c3840e55b", "measure_id": "201000470", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by making health and safety improvements, modernizing and renovating classrooms, improving energy efficiency, modernizing playgrounds, replacing 40-year-old dilapidated temporary portables, improving technology, upgrading computers and replacing outdated windows, shall the Forestville Union School District issue $5,100,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, no bond money for administrator or teacher salaries and no bond money taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2104, "no_votes": 1079, "total_votes": 3183, "percent_yes": 66.101164, "percent_no": 33.898836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.078295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.197289", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by making health and safety improvements, modernizing and renovating classrooms, improving energy efficiency, modernizing playgrounds, replacing 40-year-old dilapidated temporary portables, improving technology, upgrading computers and replacing outdated windows, shall the Forestville Union School District issue $5,100,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, no bond money for administrator or teacher salaries and no bond money taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6646, "fingerprint": "2010|201000471|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000471|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9d17012eb0ff50a4", "measure_id": "201000471", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds to acquire, construct and improve calssrooms and facilities, expand student access to computers and technology, and provide renewable energy and related improvements to better maintain schools and reduce annual operating costs, shall Piner-Olivet Union School District be authorized to issue up to $20,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee and annual audits, and no money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3006, "no_votes": 2423, "total_votes": 5429, "percent_yes": 55.369310000000006, "percent_no": 44.630689999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.078720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.197474", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds to acquire, construct and improve calssrooms and facilities, expand student access to computers and technology, and provide renewable energy and related improvements to better maintain schools and reduce annual operating costs, shall Piner-Olivet Union School District be authorized to issue up to $20,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee and annual audits, and no money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6648, "fingerprint": "2010|201000473|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000473|SONOMA", "content_hash": "2a27d0046cfb9659", "measure_id": "201000473", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify for State matching grants; reduce annual school operating costs by installing solar energy improvements and elminating leases; replace portables and construct permanent libraries at Apple Blossom School and Twin Hills Middle School; and to construct a technology center and expand student access to computers and technology, shall the Twin Hills Union School District be authorized to issue up to $11,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight and independent annual performance and financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1975, "no_votes": 1071, "total_votes": 3046, "percent_yes": 64.83913, "percent_no": 35.16087, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.079392", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.197842", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify for State matching grants; reduce annual school operating costs by installing solar energy improvements and elminating leases; replace portables and construct permanent libraries at Apple Blossom School and Twin Hills Middle School; and to construct a technology center and expand student access to computers and technology, shall the Twin Hills Union School District be authorized to issue up to $11,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight and independent annual performance and financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6635, "fingerprint": "2010|201000186|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000186|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0e55e8ba9f162d0c", "measure_id": "201000186", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Sonoma County Civil Service Ordinance be amended to provide that the director of human resources be appointed by the Board of Supervisors and to add the director of human resources to the list of unclassified employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 87550, "no_votes": 59440, "total_votes": 146990, "percent_yes": 59.56186999999999, "percent_no": 40.43813000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.073734", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.195156", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sonoma County Civil Service Ordinance be amended to provide that the director of human resources be appointed by the Board of Supervisors and to add the director of human resources to the list of unclassified employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6641, "fingerprint": "2010|201000380|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000380|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c2830376579ebc69", "measure_id": "201000380", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the City of Santa Rosa adopt an ordinance amending section 17-28.010 of the Santa Rosa City Code to extend Santa Rosa's Urban Growth Boundary ordinance until December 31, 2035?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32487, "no_votes": 15928, "total_votes": 48415, "percent_yes": 67.101103, "percent_no": 32.898897000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.076219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.196255", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the City of Santa Rosa adopt an ordinance amending section 17-28.010 of the Santa Rosa City Code to extend Santa Rosa's Urban Growth Boundary ordinance until December 31, 2035?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6642, "fingerprint": "2010|201000381|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000381|SONOMA", "content_hash": "63ea3c795a8779bb", "measure_id": "201000381", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help maintain essential City services including police and fire protection; violent and gang-crime prevention; pedestrian safety; property and nuisance-related crime prevention; street paving and pothole repair; park safety; and recreation and youth programs, shall the City of Santa Rosa enact a one-quarter cent sales tax for eight years, with all revenue staying in the City and subject to annual, independent audits and public expenditure reports?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30119, "no_votes": 22759, "total_votes": 52878, "percent_yes": 56.959414, "percent_no": 43.040586, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.076630", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.196439", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help maintain essential City services including police and fire protection; violent and gang-crime prevention; pedestrian safety; property and nuisance-related crime prevention; street paving and pothole repair; park safety; and recreation and youth programs, shall the City of Santa Rosa enact a one-quarter cent sales tax for eight years, with all revenue staying in the City and subject to annual, independent audits and public expenditure reports?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6636, "fingerprint": "2010|201000375|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000375|SONOMA", "content_hash": "69b4f6ecddcc1a5f", "measure_id": "201000375", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted creating an Urban Growth Boundary for the City of Cloverdale?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1593, "no_votes": 1249, "total_votes": 2842, "percent_yes": 56.052077, "percent_no": 43.947923, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.074148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.195336", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted creating an Urban Growth Boundary for the City of Cloverdale?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6637, "fingerprint": "2010|201000376|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000376|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f59c180df3fda3f8", "measure_id": "201000376", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of Cloverdale City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1412, "no_votes": 1314, "total_votes": 2726, "percent_yes": 51.797503, "percent_no": 48.202497, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.074555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.195519", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of Cloverdale City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6638, "fingerprint": "2010|201000377|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000377|SONOMA", "content_hash": "bb5c4cebf439bdb5", "measure_id": "201000377", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of Cloverdale City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1254, "no_votes": 1484, "total_votes": 2738, "percent_yes": 45.799854, "percent_no": 54.200146, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.074963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.195701", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of Cloverdale City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6639, "fingerprint": "2010|201000378|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000378|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e1dfb8a841122827", "measure_id": "201000378", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to change the expiration of Petaluma's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB ) from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2025?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13962, "no_votes": 7428, "total_votes": 21390, "percent_yes": 65.273494, "percent_no": 34.726506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.075370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.195880", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to change the expiration of Petaluma's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB ) from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2025?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6640, "fingerprint": "2010|201000379|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000379|SONOMA", "content_hash": "17950f8d2bdcef23", "measure_id": "201000379", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce City of Petaluma wastewater service rates to rates in effect on January 1, 2006?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9123, "no_votes": 11616, "total_votes": 20739, "percent_yes": 43.989584, "percent_no": 56.010416, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.075790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.196068", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce City of Petaluma wastewater service rates to rates in effect on January 1, 2006?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6650, "fingerprint": "2010|201000136|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000136|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "321bc309b6578307", "measure_id": "201000136", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Thomas Crowder be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 971, "no_votes": 154, "total_votes": 1125, "percent_yes": 86.311114, "percent_no": 13.688885999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-24", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.079968", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.198212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Thomas Crowder be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6651, "fingerprint": "2010|201000137|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000137|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "7661dcc3af1aa674", "measure_id": "201000137", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Doug Humphreys be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 981, "no_votes": 141, "total_votes": 1122, "percent_yes": 87.43315299999999, "percent_no": 12.56684700000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-24", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.080239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.198393", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Doug Humphreys be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6652, "fingerprint": "2010|201000138|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000138|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "c765ccf23afadc99", "measure_id": "201000138", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ben Manley be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 994, "no_votes": 121, "total_votes": 1115, "percent_yes": 89.14798499999999, "percent_no": 10.852015000000009, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-08-24", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.080508", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.198583", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ben Manley be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6657, "fingerprint": "2010|201000386|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000386|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "0895f549d5062681", "measure_id": "201000386", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending Section 34.47 of the Code of the City of Riverbank, providing that \"for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel, each transient is subject and shall pay a tax in the amount of 9% of the rent charged by the operator\", be adopted? If Measure G passes the transient occupancy tax rate as set forth in Section 34.47 of the Riverbank City Code would be increased ffrom 4% to 9%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1790, "no_votes": 2616, "total_votes": 4406, "percent_yes": 40.62642, "percent_no": 59.37358, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.082042", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.199509", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending Section 34.47 of the Code of the City of Riverbank, providing that \"for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel, each transient is subject and shall pay a tax in the amount of 9% of the rent charged by the operator\", be adopted? If Measure G passes the transient occupancy tax rate as set forth in Section 34.47 of the Riverbank City Code would be increased ffrom 4% to 9%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6658, "fingerprint": "2010|201000475|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000475|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "91baef17fd8eed5b", "measure_id": "201000475", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, modernize and renovate the high school, improve energy efficiency to reduce operating costs, build a science building at the high school, upgrade technology and inadequate electrical systems, and improve and expand physical education fields and facilities, shall the Hughson Unified School District issue $21,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1533, "no_votes": 2224, "total_votes": 3757, "percent_yes": 40.803832, "percent_no": 59.196168, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.082316", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.199694", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, modernize and renovate the high school, improve energy efficiency to reduce operating costs, build a science building at the high school, upgrade technology and inadequate electrical systems, and improve and expand physical education fields and facilities, shall the Hughson Unified School District issue $21,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6659, "fingerprint": "2010|201000476|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000476|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "99f70957600b508d", "measure_id": "201000476", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; construct a career technical education building for shop, science, and technology classes; upgrade outdated heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; improve technology and inadequate electrical systems; modernize outdated classrooms and school facilities; and improve energy efficiency; shall the Waterford Unified School District issue $11,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 849, "no_votes": 1340, "total_votes": 2189, "percent_yes": 38.784835, "percent_no": 61.215165, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.082588", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.199885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; construct a career technical education building for shop, science, and technology classes; upgrade outdated heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; improve technology and inadequate electrical systems; modernize outdated classrooms and school facilities; and improve energy efficiency; shall the Waterford Unified School District issue $11,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6653, "fingerprint": "2010|201000382|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000382|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "51fe117dfc5ca66a", "measure_id": "201000382", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 300 of the Modesto City Charter be amended to eliminate run-off elections for Council districts and continue, if necessary, run-off elections for the position of Mayor, to be held on the first Tuesday in February of each even numbered year, commencing with the year 2012 and delete irrelevant dates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28007, "no_votes": 15972, "total_votes": 43979, "percent_yes": 63.68267, "percent_no": 36.31733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.080774", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.198772", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 300 of the Modesto City Charter be amended to eliminate run-off elections for Council districts and continue, if necessary, run-off elections for the position of Mayor, to be held on the first Tuesday in February of each even numbered year, commencing with the year 2012 and delete irrelevant dates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6654, "fingerprint": "2010|201000383|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000383|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "695d406bb36c6c91", "measure_id": "201000383", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 300 of the Modesto City Charter be amended to clarify that any run-off election, if necessary, shall be conducted if any candidate for a particular office does not receive a majority of the valid votes cast for that office in a regular municipal election and to delete irrelevant dates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28340, "no_votes": 15168, "total_votes": 43508, "percent_yes": 65.137446, "percent_no": 34.862554, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.081139", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.198954", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 300 of the Modesto City Charter be amended to clarify that any run-off election, if necessary, shall be conducted if any candidate for a particular office does not receive a majority of the valid votes cast for that office in a regular municipal election and to delete irrelevant dates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6655, "fingerprint": "2010|201000384|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000384|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "0369a7cf54b27c7f", "measure_id": "201000384", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following unincorporated county area described below? The unincorporated area known as the \"Parklawn Neighborhood\" which is described generally as the area bounded by Hatch Road on north, Pearson Avenue/Union Pacific Railroad on west, Nelson Way extended from the centerline of Nelson Way westerly to Union Pacific Railroad on south, and Morgan Road/Union Pacific Railroad on east.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26218, "no_votes": 18778, "total_votes": 44996, "percent_yes": 58.2674, "percent_no": 41.7326, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.081417", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.199135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following unincorporated county area described below? The unincorporated area known as the \"Parklawn Neighborhood\" which is described generally as the area bounded by Hatch Road on north, Pearson Avenue/Union Pacific Railroad on west, Nelson Way extended from the centerline of Nelson Way westerly to Union Pacific Railroad on south, and Morgan Road/Union Pacific Railroad on east.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6656, "fingerprint": "2010|201000385|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000385|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "bd4a21b835dc52a3", "measure_id": "201000385", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be changed from two (2) years to four (4) years effective at the election for Mayor on November 6, 2012?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1373, "no_votes": 2264, "total_votes": 3637, "percent_yes": 37.750894, "percent_no": 62.249106, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.081687", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.199322", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be changed from two (2) years to four (4) years effective at the election for Mayor on November 6, 2012?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6660, "fingerprint": "2010|201000131|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000131|SUTTER", "content_hash": "a261fcd2e8a171a4", "measure_id": "201000131", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Tim Crabtree be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1482, "no_votes": 548, "total_votes": 2030, "percent_yes": 73.004925, "percent_no": 26.995075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.082855", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.200069", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Tim Crabtree be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6661, "fingerprint": "2010|201000187|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000187|SUTTER", "content_hash": "abe65b87aa79377e", "measure_id": "201000187", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance titled \"An Ordinance of the County of Sutter Amending Section 1500-1750, Section III, of Division 17 of the Sutter County Ordinance Code relating to the FPARC Food Processing, Agricultural and Recreation Combining District\" allowing repeal or amendment of the FPARC Ordinance by the Board of Supervisors without a vote of the people be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7294, "no_votes": 16261, "total_votes": 23555, "percent_yes": 30.965826000000003, "percent_no": 69.034174, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.083125", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.200263", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance titled \"An Ordinance of the County of Sutter Amending Section 1500-1750, Section III, of Division 17 of the Sutter County Ordinance Code relating to the FPARC Food Processing, Agricultural and Recreation Combining District\" allowing repeal or amendment of the FPARC Ordinance by the Board of Supervisors without a vote of the people be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1221, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1199|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1199|Statewide", "content_hash": "ac7a87a8c8d697a8", "measure_id": "CA1199", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Limits on Property Tax Assessment. Seismic Retrofitting of Existing Buildings. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 85.0, "percent_no": 15.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows property owners to exclude the cost of seismic safety imp...", "summary_text": "This measure allows property owners to exclude the cost of seismic safety improvements from property tax assessments, meaning such retrofitting work would not increase the property's assessed value for tax purposes. It amended the state constitution to provide this tax incentive for earthquake safety upgrades to existing buildings.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1220, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1198|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1198|Statewide", "content_hash": "fcb6ac900aff3df9", "measure_id": "CA1198", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Redistricting of Congressional Districts. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.29999924, "percent_no": 38.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure transferred the authority to redraw California's congressional di...", "summary_text": "The measure transferred the authority to redraw California's congressional district boundaries from the state legislature to the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, which was previously only responsible for state legislative districts. This expanded the commission's role to include congressional redistricting in addition to its existing duties for Assembly and Senate districts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1219, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1197|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1197|Statewide", "content_hash": "4e7e8d7822863096", "measure_id": "CA1197", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Prohibits the State from Taking Funds Used for Transportation or Local Government Projects and Services. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.70000076, "percent_no": 39.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Local Government | State Government | Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure amended California's constitution to prohibit the state f...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure amended California's constitution to prohibit the state from redirecting funds that are designated for transportation projects or local government services to other purposes. It aimed to protect transportation and local government funding from being diverted to cover other state budget needs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1218, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1196|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1196|Statewide", "content_hash": "894a2fb86f4bbe7d", "measure_id": "CA1196", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 25", "description": "Changes Legislative Vote Requirement to Pass a Budget from Two-Thirds to a Simple Majority. Retains Two-Thirds Vote Requirement for Taxes. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.09999847, "percent_no": 44.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed California's legislative vote requirement to pass the st...", "summary_text": "This measure changed California's legislative vote requirement to pass the state budget from a two-thirds majority to a simple majority, while maintaining the two-thirds vote requirement for tax increases. The constitutional amendment was approved by voters in 2010.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 25", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_25_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2025%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2025%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1217, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1195|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1195|Statewide", "content_hash": "8dd09e2ff7b737d6", "measure_id": "CA1195", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Elections. Increase Right to Participate in Primary Elections.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.79999924, "percent_no": 46.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed all candidates for state and federal office to appear on...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed all candidates for state and federal office to appear on a single primary ballot, with all voters able to choose from any candidate regardless of political party affiliation. The top two vote-getters would advance to the general election, regardless of party.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1216, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1194|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1194|Statewide", "content_hash": "9dd7aac87e1280dd", "measure_id": "CA1194", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 26", "description": "Requires that Certain State and Local Fees Be Approved by Two-Thirds Vote. Fees Include Those that Address Adverse Impacts on Society or the Environment Caused by Fee-Payer's Business. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.5, "percent_no": 47.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Legislatures | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended California's constitution to require a two-thirds vote b...", "summary_text": "This measure amended California's constitution to require a two-thirds vote by the legislature or local governing body to approve certain state and local fees, including those designed to address adverse impacts on society or the environment caused by the fee-payer's business. The measure expanded the existing two-thirds vote requirement beyond taxes to include specific categories of fees.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 26", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_26_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2026%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2026%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1215, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1193|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1193|Statewide", "content_hash": "8fc98a793613ebc0", "measure_id": "CA1193", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Allows Auto Insurance Companies to Base Their Prices in Part on a Driver's History of Insurance Coverage. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.09999847, "percent_no": 51.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed auto insurance companies in California to fac...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed auto insurance companies in California to factor a driver's history of insurance coverage into their pricing decisions. The initiative would have modified existing regulations that limited the factors insurers could use when setting premium rates.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1214, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1192|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1192|Statewide", "content_hash": "16d7679a8a265ff1", "measure_id": "CA1192", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Imposes New Two-Thirds Voter Approval Requirement for Local Public Electricity Providers. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.20000076, "percent_no": 52.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Energy & Electric Utilities\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required a two-thirds majority vote from local voters...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required a two-thirds majority vote from local voters before a city, county, or other local government entity could establish or expand a publicly-owned electric utility. It would have applied this supermajority requirement to local governments seeking to provide electricity services to residents and businesses in their jurisdiction.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1213, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1191|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1191|Statewide", "content_hash": "4f559576bdcd9da3", "measure_id": "CA1191", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Changes California Law to Legalize Marijuana and Allow It to Be Regulated and Taxed.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.5, "percent_no": 53.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have legalized the possession and cultivation of marijuana...", "summary_text": "This measure would have legalized the possession and cultivation of marijuana for personal use by adults 21 and older, and allowed local governments to regulate and tax commercial marijuana sales. It would have permitted adults to possess up to one ounce of marijuana and grow plants in a 25-square-foot area for personal use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1212, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1190|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1190|Statewide", "content_hash": "720096e6aa25af59", "measure_id": "CA1190", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Establishes $18 Annual Vehicle License Surcharge to Help Fund State Parks and Wildlife Programs and Grants Free Admission to All State Parks to Surcharged Vehicles.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.70000076, "percent_no": 57.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Natural Resources | Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established an $18 annual surcharge on vehicle regist...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established an $18 annual surcharge on vehicle registrations to fund state parks and wildlife programs, while providing free admission to all state parks for vehicles that paid the surcharge. The measure failed with 42.7% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1211, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1189|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1189|Statewide", "content_hash": "ff6062d61a953df0", "measure_id": "CA1189", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "California Fair Elections Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.70000076, "percent_no": 57.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1210, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1188|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1188|Statewide", "content_hash": "6a2f5420f9f7399f", "measure_id": "CA1188", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 24", "description": "Repeals Recent Legislation that Would Allow Businesses to Lower Their Tax Liability. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.90000153, "percent_no": 58.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have repealed recent state legislation that allowed busine...", "summary_text": "This measure would have repealed recent state legislation that allowed businesses to reduce their tax liability through certain provisions. The initiative sought to restore previous tax rules by eliminating these business tax reduction mechanisms.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 24", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1209, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1187|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1187|Statewide", "content_hash": "6e80c02569506049", "measure_id": "CA1187", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 27", "description": "Eliminates State Commission on Redistricting. Consolidates Authority for Redistricting with Elected Representatives. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.5, "percent_no": 59.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have eliminated California's independent redistricting com...", "summary_text": "This measure would have eliminated California's independent redistricting commission and returned the authority to draw legislative and congressional district boundaries to elected state legislators. The measure failed with 40.5% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 27", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_27_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2027%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2027%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1208, "fingerprint": "2010|CA1186|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|CA1186|Statewide", "content_hash": "e526270751652cc4", "measure_id": "CA1186", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Suspends Implementation of Air Pollution Control Law (AB 32) Requiring Major Sources of Emissions to Report and Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions That Cause Global Warming, Until Unemployment Drops to 5.5 Percent or Less for Full Year.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.40000153, "percent_no": 61.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Environmental Protection\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have suspended California's AB 32 climate law, which requi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have suspended California's AB 32 climate law, which requires major emissions sources to report and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, until the state's unemployment rate dropped to 5.5% or lower for a full year. The suspension would have halted implementation of the air pollution control requirements aimed at addressing global warming.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(2010)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2010/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2010", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%202010", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%202010", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 6664, "fingerprint": "2010|201000133|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000133|TULARE", "content_hash": "455c93a95b93de33", "measure_id": "201000133", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $97.00 per parcel annually, with annual cost of living adjustments, so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 431, "no_votes": 440, "total_votes": 871, "percent_yes": 49.483353, "percent_no": 50.516647, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.084077", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.200832", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $97.00 per parcel annually, with annual cost of living adjustments, so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6663, "fingerprint": "2010|201000132|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000132|TULARE", "content_hash": "85b1da0c88972d5e", "measure_id": "201000132", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of educaiton, modernize, upgrade and repair classrooms and school facilities in the District; improve energy efficiency; make health/safety improvements; construct new classrooms and restrooms; and renovate plumbing and sewer systems; shall Corcoran Joint Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, and equip school facilities by issuing $24,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teach salaries or be taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5, "no_votes": 18, "total_votes": 23, "percent_yes": 21.73913, "percent_no": 78.26087, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.083807", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.200645", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of educaiton, modernize, upgrade and repair classrooms and school facilities in the District; improve energy efficiency; make health/safety improvements; construct new classrooms and restrooms; and renovate plumbing and sewer systems; shall Corcoran Joint Unified School District acquire, construct, repair, and equip school facilities by issuing $24,700,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative or teach salaries or be taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6662, "fingerprint": "2010|201000087|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000087|TULARE", "content_hash": "c6887968cc78f0ef", "measure_id": "201000087", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Measure R to amend Section 68 of the Freeholders Charter of the City of Porterville, eliminating the requirement that all leases contain a clause allowing the City Council to terminate the lease with 3 months notice, extending the allowed term of lease from 50 to 55 years, and allowing leases for up to 99 years if the lease provides for periodic review in light of market conditions, and the lease is established by ordinance after a noticed public hearing, and is therefore subject to referendum.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1775, "no_votes": 2303, "total_votes": 4078, "percent_yes": 43.526238, "percent_no": 56.473762, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.083499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.200455", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Measure R to amend Section 68 of the Freeholders Charter of the City of Porterville, eliminating the requirement that all leases contain a clause allowing the City Council to terminate the lease with 3 months notice, extending the allowed term of lease from 50 to 55 years, and allowing leases for up to 99 years if the lease provides for periodic review in light of market conditions, and the lease is established by ordinance after a noticed public hearing, and is therefore subject to referendum.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6666, "fingerprint": "2010|201000477|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000477|TULARE", "content_hash": "c2cfa786c99c11eb", "measure_id": "201000477", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, construct, modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities; make health and safety improvements; update sports facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; improvement to kitchen facilities; and construct a local gymnasium for school and community use; shall the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 812, "no_votes": 716, "total_votes": 1528, "percent_yes": 53.141360000000006, "percent_no": 46.858639999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.084676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.201212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, construct, modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities; make health and safety improvements; update sports facilities; improve student access to computers and modern technology; improvement to kitchen facilities; and construct a local gymnasium for school and community use; shall the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6667, "fingerprint": "2010|201000478|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000478|TULARE", "content_hash": "3545ebb273dd283d", "measure_id": "201000478", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $89.00 per parcel annually, with annual cost of living adjustments, so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 664, "no_votes": 819, "total_votes": 1483, "percent_yes": 44.774106, "percent_no": 55.225894, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.085020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.201412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $89.00 per parcel annually, with annual cost of living adjustments, so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6668, "fingerprint": "2010|201000479|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000479|TULARE", "content_hash": "007791a09b0ea4d0", "measure_id": "201000479", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide quality educational programs for the students at Three Rivers School, the District shall levy a tax of $56.00 per parcel annually, for a period of 5 years, with annual cost of living adjustments, so long as the Three Rivers Elementary School Board oversees the program and uses all proceeds to directly support single grade classrooms; maintain the status of a single school district; support band/music, art, sports programs; and provide educational fieldtrips.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 694, "no_votes": 530, "total_votes": 1224, "percent_yes": 56.69935, "percent_no": 43.30065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.085294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.201598", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide quality educational programs for the students at Three Rivers School, the District shall levy a tax of $56.00 per parcel annually, for a period of 5 years, with annual cost of living adjustments, so long as the Three Rivers Elementary School Board oversees the program and uses all proceeds to directly support single grade classrooms; maintain the status of a single school district; support band/music, art, sports programs; and provide educational fieldtrips.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6665, "fingerprint": "2010|201000387|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000387|TULARE", "content_hash": "7fa9c900dac04bb9", "measure_id": "201000387", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended clarifying when municipal elections are held; repealing the procedure to deposit for signatures for initiative, referendum, and recall petitions; separating the titles of Parks & Recreation Director and Library Director; and repealing sections that are no longer applicable to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6299, "no_votes": 2926, "total_votes": 9225, "percent_yes": 68.28184, "percent_no": 31.718159999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.084387", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.201021", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended clarifying when municipal elections are held; repealing the procedure to deposit for signatures for initiative, referendum, and recall petitions; separating the titles of Parks & Recreation Director and Library Director; and repealing sections that are no longer applicable to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6669, "fingerprint": "2010|201000048|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000048|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "1aff6c9f4a073b06", "measure_id": "201000048", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 3106, which amends Chapter 3.32 of the Tuolumne County Ordinance Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%), be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8085, "no_votes": 6524, "total_votes": 14609, "percent_yes": 55.342597000000005, "percent_no": 44.657402999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.085575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.201782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 3106, which amends Chapter 3.32 of the Tuolumne County Ordinance Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%), be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6670, "fingerprint": "2010|201000088|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000088|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "c424a35b8dd5794b", "measure_id": "201000088", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 790, which amends Chapter 3.20 of the City of Sonora Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%), be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 705, "no_votes": 462, "total_votes": 1167, "percent_yes": 60.41130999999999, "percent_no": 39.58869000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.085846", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.201964", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 790, which amends Chapter 3.20 of the City of Sonora Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%), be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6672, "fingerprint": "2010|201000481|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000481|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "e63918ad7c1d8fd2", "measure_id": "201000481", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; modernize classrooms and school facilities, including handicapped accessibility improvements; upgrade technology; improve energy efficiency; make health and safety improvements; and improve athletic facilities for school and community use; shall the Summerville Union High School District acquire, construct, repair, and equip school facilities by issuing $8,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have No money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2354, "no_votes": 1999, "total_votes": 4353, "percent_yes": 54.07765, "percent_no": 45.92235, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.086509", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.202333", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; modernize classrooms and school facilities, including handicapped accessibility improvements; upgrade technology; improve energy efficiency; make health and safety improvements; and improve athletic facilities for school and community use; shall the Summerville Union High School District acquire, construct, repair, and equip school facilities by issuing $8,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and have No money used for administrative or teacher salaries or be taken by the state?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6671, "fingerprint": "2010|201000480|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000480|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "5d6a0b38b50c79e2", "measure_id": "201000480", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace/upgrade inadequate electrical, fire alarm, and plumbing systems; modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities including the library; and qualify to receive up to $3,800,000 in state matching funds, shall Sonora Elementary School District issue $7,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens; oversight committee and have NO money for administrative or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1867, "no_votes": 1518, "total_votes": 3385, "percent_yes": 55.1551, "percent_no": 44.8449, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.086114", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.202146", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; make health and safety improvements; increase student access to computers and modern technology; replace/upgrade inadequate electrical, fire alarm, and plumbing systems; modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities including the library; and qualify to receive up to $3,800,000 in state matching funds, shall Sonora Elementary School District issue $7,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, have an independent citizens; oversight committee and have NO money for administrative or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6673, "fingerprint": "2010|201000388|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000388|VENTURA", "content_hash": "ed8c438ad1aa6e2e", "measure_id": "201000388", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance of the City of Port Hueneme, California, amending Article V, Chapter 4 of the Port Hueneme Municipal Code replacing the Telephone Users tax regulations with Modern Communication Services tax regulations and reducing the tax rate from 4% to 3.75% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3284, "no_votes": 948, "total_votes": 4232, "percent_yes": 77.599245, "percent_no": 22.400755000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.086801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.202529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance of the City of Port Hueneme, California, amending Article V, Chapter 4 of the Port Hueneme Municipal Code replacing the Telephone Users tax regulations with Modern Communication Services tax regulations and reducing the tax rate from 4% to 3.75% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6674, "fingerprint": "2010|201000482|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000482|VENTURA", "content_hash": "0a1f7fa24aed526d", "measure_id": "201000482", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain/improve academic programs including reading, writing, science and math; fund computer technology, music and arts; retain highly qualified teachers and minimize class-size increases; shall Ventura USD raise $4.5 million per year for four years through a parcel tax at a rate described in the voter pamphlet, provided there is independent citizens' oversight, senior exemptions, and all funds are spent on neighborhood schools and cannot be taken by the State and used elsewhere?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24491, "no_votes": 16767, "total_votes": 41258, "percent_yes": 59.36061, "percent_no": 40.63939, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.087136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.202716", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain/improve academic programs including reading, writing, science and math; fund computer technology, music and arts; retain highly qualified teachers and minimize class-size increases; shall Ventura USD raise $4.5 million per year for four years through a parcel tax at a rate described in the voter pamphlet, provided there is independent citizens' oversight, senior exemptions, and all funds are spent on neighborhood schools and cannot be taken by the State and used elsewhere?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6675, "fingerprint": "2010|201000089|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000089|YOLO", "content_hash": "126425c7800d5779", "measure_id": "201000089", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2353, which would authorize the City of Davis to continue to collect a one-half cent sales and use tax for general government purposes through December 31, 2016, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10543, "no_votes": 3609, "total_votes": 14152, "percent_yes": 74.4983, "percent_no": 25.5017, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.087410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.202900", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2353, which would authorize the City of Davis to continue to collect a one-half cent sales and use tax for general government purposes through December 31, 2016, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6676, "fingerprint": "2010|201000090|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000090|YOLO", "content_hash": "9a023e8dd9078404", "measure_id": "201000090", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall Ordinance No. 2350, to Amend and Extend \u201cMeasure J\u201d (Ordinance No. 2008 - Citizens\u2019 Right to Vote on Future Use of Open Space and Agricultural Lands) to Extend the Sunset Date of the Measure to December 31, 2020, and to Make Technical Changes to the Ordinance, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10474, "no_votes": 3187, "total_votes": 13661, "percent_yes": 76.670814, "percent_no": 23.329186000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.087724", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.203090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall Ordinance No. 2350, to Amend and Extend \u201cMeasure J\u201d (Ordinance No. 2008 - Citizens\u2019 Right to Vote on Future Use of Open Space and Agricultural Lands) to Extend the Sunset Date of the Measure to December 31, 2020, and to Make Technical Changes to the Ordinance, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6679, "fingerprint": "2010|201000093|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000093|YOLO", "content_hash": "9046d823e3693d9d", "measure_id": "201000093", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Advisory Vote Only. This measure does not increase taxes. Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland provide 30% of the sales tax received to the Woodland Public Library to restore educational and literacy programs and maintain operating hours at 54 hours per week?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5700, "no_votes": 3038, "total_votes": 8738, "percent_yes": 65.23232, "percent_no": 34.76768, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.088627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.203700", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Advisory Vote Only. This measure does not increase taxes. Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland provide 30% of the sales tax received to the Woodland Public Library to restore educational and literacy programs and maintain operating hours at 54 hours per week?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6680, "fingerprint": "2010|201000094|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000094|YOLO", "content_hash": "73915f6720055ea9", "measure_id": "201000094", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Advisory Vote Only. This measure does not increase taxes. Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland provide 30% of the sales tax received to the Woodland Parks & Recreation Department to maintain current levels of park and public landscape maintenance and senior citizen programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5486, "no_votes": 3148, "total_votes": 8634, "percent_yes": 63.539493, "percent_no": 36.460507, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.088894", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.203894", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Advisory Vote Only. This measure does not increase taxes. Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland provide 30% of the sales tax received to the Woodland Parks & Recreation Department to maintain current levels of park and public landscape maintenance and senior citizen programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6681, "fingerprint": "2010|201000095|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000095|YOLO", "content_hash": "44d6e5c8c0dea10d", "measure_id": "201000095", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Advisory Vote Only. This measure does not increase taxes. Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland provide 40% of the sales tax received to Public Safety services within the Woodland Police Department and Woodland Fire Department to maintain the current number of sworn police officers and firefighters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5722, "no_votes": 2942, "total_votes": 8664, "percent_yes": 66.04339999999999, "percent_no": 33.95660000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.089161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.204077", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Advisory Vote Only. This measure does not increase taxes. Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland provide 40% of the sales tax received to Public Safety services within the Woodland Police Department and Woodland Fire Department to maintain the current number of sworn police officers and firefighters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6682, "fingerprint": "2010|201000096|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000096|YOLO", "content_hash": "6dda8c75729d6a50", "measure_id": "201000096", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Woodland City Concil implement a one-quarter cent sales tax for general CITY SERVICES, PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES, with the following mandatory restrictions? The sales tax will expire after four years, unless reauthorized by the voters. - A detailed spending plan and report will be presented to the public and published in newspapers.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4892, "no_votes": 4029, "total_votes": 8921, "percent_yes": 54.8369, "percent_no": 45.1631, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.089677", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.204260", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Woodland City Concil implement a one-quarter cent sales tax for general CITY SERVICES, PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES, with the following mandatory restrictions? The sales tax will expire after four years, unless reauthorized by the voters. - A detailed spending plan and report will be presented to the public and published in newspapers.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6677, "fingerprint": "2010|201000091|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000091|YOLO", "content_hash": "cb2b53a7cfc3dcd1", "measure_id": "201000091", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect/maintain essential City of Winters services, including public safety (police/fire), 9-1-1 police/fire response times, maintaining the Community Center, recreation and swim programs, library services, and preserving other general City services, shall the City Utility Users Tax be increased to Nine and One Half Percent (9.50%), the tax not to exceed $450 annually for each residential unit (dwelling), within the city limits (City Ordinance 2010-02)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 571, "no_votes": 510, "total_votes": 1081, "percent_yes": 52.821463, "percent_no": 47.178537, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.088010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.203284", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect/maintain essential City of Winters services, including public safety (police/fire), 9-1-1 police/fire response times, maintaining the Community Center, recreation and swim programs, library services, and preserving other general City services, shall the City Utility Users Tax be increased to Nine and One Half Percent (9.50%), the tax not to exceed $450 annually for each residential unit (dwelling), within the city limits (City Ordinance 2010-02)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6678, "fingerprint": "2010|201000092|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000092|YOLO", "content_hash": "1a037a75c1bc86d9", "measure_id": "201000092", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should revenue from the increase in the utility users tax proposed in the Winters Vital City Services Measure give priority to funding operational expenses for City of Winters police and fire services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 533, "no_votes": 485, "total_votes": 1018, "percent_yes": 52.357566, "percent_no": 47.642434, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-06-08", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.088351", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.203472", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should revenue from the increase in the utility users tax proposed in the Winters Vital City Services Measure give priority to funding operational expenses for City of Winters police and fire services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6683, "fingerprint": "2010|201000389|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2010|201000389|YUBA", "content_hash": "ee7b3bfd575a391c", "measure_id": "201000389", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2010, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the safety and character of Wheatland, and maintain and protect general city services including essential services such as neighborhood police patrols, 911 emergency response, disaster preparedness, street paving and pothole repair, park maintenance and other essential services, shall the City of Wheatland enact a one-half cent transaction (sales) and use tax for 10 years, subject to annual audits and public review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 503, "no_votes": 434, "total_votes": 937, "percent_yes": 53.68196400000001, "percent_no": 46.31803599999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2010-11-02", "decade": 2010, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.089947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.204446", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the safety and character of Wheatland, and maintain and protect general city services including essential services such as neighborhood police patrols, 911 emergency response, disaster preparedness, street paving and pothole repair, park maintenance and other essential services, shall the City of Wheatland enact a one-half cent transaction (sales) and use tax for 10 years, subject to annual audits and public review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6684, "fingerprint": "2009|200900046|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900046|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fca91f2b426348c5", "measure_id": "200900046", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent severe cuts to Hayward city services including: maintaining firefighters, paramedics, fire stations, and neighborhood police patrols; protecting emergency response times; preserving youth/anti-gang programs, disaster preparedness, and job/economic development services; shall the City of Hayward adopt an Ordinance enacting a Utility Users Tax of 5.5% on gas, electricity, video and telecommunications services, for 10 years only, with exemptions available for low-income/lifeline users; and all money dedicated to preserving Hayward city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7999, "no_votes": 6814, "total_votes": 14813, "percent_yes": 53.999865, "percent_no": 46.000135, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.090324", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.204631", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent severe cuts to Hayward city services including: maintaining firefighters, paramedics, fire stations, and neighborhood police patrols; protecting emergency response times; preserving youth/anti-gang programs, disaster preparedness, and job/economic development services; shall the City of Hayward adopt an Ordinance enacting a Utility Users Tax of 5.5% on gas, electricity, video and telecommunications services, for 10 years only, with exemptions available for low-income/lifeline users; and all money dedicated to preserving Hayward city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6685, "fingerprint": "2009|200900064|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900064|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e8a086f7d0552bb9", "measure_id": "200900064", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent existing school funding from expiring and maintain Piedmont's excellent quality of public education by attracting and retaining qualified teachers, maintaining small class sizes and protecting instructional programs and services, including art and music, foreign language, advanced placement, school libraries, classroom technology and student counseling, shall Piedmont Unified School District continue to levy special taxes up to the amounts specified in the voter pamphlet for four years and with all funds staying locally to benefit Piedmont schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3986, "no_votes": 1100, "total_votes": 5086, "percent_yes": 78.372, "percent_no": 21.628, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.090800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.204817", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent existing school funding from expiring and maintain Piedmont's excellent quality of public education by attracting and retaining qualified teachers, maintaining small class sizes and protecting instructional programs and services, including art and music, foreign language, advanced placement, school libraries, classroom technology and student counseling, shall Piedmont Unified School District continue to levy special taxes up to the amounts specified in the voter pamphlet for four years and with all funds staying locally to benefit Piedmont schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6688, "fingerprint": "2009|200900075|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900075|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f6040c4241d393d9", "measure_id": "200900075", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide additional funding to the Oakland Zoo, the Oakland Museum of California, the Chabot Space and Science Center, cultural arts programs and festivals and the Oakland Convention and Visitor Bureau, shall the City of Oakland add a three percent (3%) surcharge to the current eleven percent (11 %) Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) that persons who stay in Oakland hotels pay?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38907, "no_votes": 11757, "total_votes": 50664, "percent_yes": 76.79417, "percent_no": 23.205830000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-07-21", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.091766", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.205379", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide additional funding to the Oakland Zoo, the Oakland Museum of California, the Chabot Space and Science Center, cultural arts programs and festivals and the Oakland Convention and Visitor Bureau, shall the City of Oakland add a three percent (3%) surcharge to the current eleven percent (11 %) Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) that persons who stay in Oakland hotels pay?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6689, "fingerprint": "2009|200900076|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900076|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3fae459e633fa7a5", "measure_id": "200900076", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require that the City (1) set aside 3.0% of its annual unrestricted General Purpose Fund revenues for grants to children's and youth services, (2) in addition to the set aside, continue to spend the amount that the City already spends on children and youth, and (3) every twelve years extend these requirements for twelve more years or seek voter approval of the extension?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36097, "no_votes": 14145, "total_votes": 50242, "percent_yes": 71.846265, "percent_no": 28.153734999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-07-21", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.092062", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.205568", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require that the City (1) set aside 3.0% of its annual unrestricted General Purpose Fund revenues for grants to children's and youth services, (2) in addition to the set aside, continue to spend the amount that the City already spends on children and youth, and (3) every twelve years extend these requirements for twelve more years or seek voter approval of the extension?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6686, "fingerprint": "2009|200900065|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900065|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a728d98294d83d9b", "measure_id": "200900065", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset the loss of state funds by providing emergency temporary local funding, shall Piedmont Unified School District levy an additional special tax up to the amounts specified in the voter pamphlet (averaging $249 per parcel) for three years to avoid teacher and staff layoffs, protect programs and counseling, and prevent other cuts to core academic programs and services, with citizens' oversight and all funds staying locally to benefit Piedmont children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3727, "no_votes": 1364, "total_votes": 5091, "percent_yes": 73.20761999999999, "percent_no": 26.79238000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.091123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.205002", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset the loss of state funds by providing emergency temporary local funding, shall Piedmont Unified School District levy an additional special tax up to the amounts specified in the voter pamphlet (averaging $249 per parcel) for three years to avoid teacher and staff layoffs, protect programs and counseling, and prevent other cuts to core academic programs and services, with citizens' oversight and all funds staying locally to benefit Piedmont children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6690, "fingerprint": "2009|200900077|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900077|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9bc81cde587f73c9", "measure_id": "200900077", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Oakland's business tax, which currently imposes a tax rate of $1.20 per $1,000 on \"cannabis business\" gross receipts, be amended to establish a new tax rate of $18 per $1,000 of gross receipts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40439, "no_votes": 10107, "total_votes": 50546, "percent_yes": 80.00435, "percent_no": 19.995649999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-07-21", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.092328", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.205760", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Oakland's business tax, which currently imposes a tax rate of $1.20 per $1,000 on \"cannabis business\" gross receipts, be amended to establish a new tax rate of $18 per $1,000 of gross receipts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6687, "fingerprint": "2009|200900066|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900066|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "980534a4f59f3608", "measure_id": "200900066", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve educational quality and protect Pleasanton schools from severe state budget cuts, keep class sizes small, maintain essential reading and math support programs, libraries, counselors, technology instruction, music, and safe, clean schools with no proceeds for administrators'salaries, shall the Pleasanton Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual $233 parcel tax for four years, with guaranteed audits, senior and disabled exemptions, an independent citizens' oversight committee and all funds benefitting our Pleasanton students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10995, "no_votes": 6546, "total_votes": 17541, "percent_yes": 62.681717000000006, "percent_no": 37.318282999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.091397", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.205192", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve educational quality and protect Pleasanton schools from severe state budget cuts, keep class sizes small, maintain essential reading and math support programs, libraries, counselors, technology instruction, music, and safe, clean schools with no proceeds for administrators'salaries, shall the Pleasanton Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual $233 parcel tax for four years, with guaranteed audits, senior and disabled exemptions, an independent citizens' oversight committee and all funds benefitting our Pleasanton students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6691, "fingerprint": "2009|200900078|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900078|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a569a9cab4f3185a", "measure_id": "200900078", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "ShalI City of Oakland's Real Property Transfer Tax be amended to clarify that the tax applies to transfers of real property caused by changes in the ownership or control of corporations and other legal entities, such as mergers and acquisitions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37192, "no_votes": 12516, "total_votes": 49708, "percent_yes": 74.820954, "percent_no": 25.179046, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-07-21", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.092596", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.205944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ShalI City of Oakland's Real Property Transfer Tax be amended to clarify that the tax applies to transfers of real property caused by changes in the ownership or control of corporations and other legal entities, such as mergers and acquisitions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6694, "fingerprint": "2009|200900177|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900177|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7843c66126f09ced", "measure_id": "200900177", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To help restore teacher positions and student services lost because of deep and unprecendented State budget cuts, including school safety and security, reading and math support, music, art and library services, shall the Albany Unified School District levy a special parcel tax for only five years at $149 per year on residential units (three cents/sq. ft. on non-residential parcels), with annual audits and adjustments for inflation, exempting homeowners age 65 and over and low-income taxpayers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2975, "no_votes": 923, "total_votes": 3898, "percent_yes": 76.32119, "percent_no": 23.67881, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.093396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.206525", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help restore teacher positions and student services lost because of deep and unprecendented State budget cuts, including school safety and security, reading and math support, music, art and library services, shall the Albany Unified School District levy a special parcel tax for only five years at $149 per year on residential units (three cents/sq. ft. on non-residential parcels), with annual audits and adjustments for inflation, exempting homeowners age 65 and over and low-income taxpayers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6695, "fingerprint": "2009|200900178|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900178|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a7dbdf5c21bc9ddb", "measure_id": "200900178", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high quality Albany public schools, shall Albany Unified School District combine, without increasing, three existing special school taxes into a single annual tax of $555/residential unit (eleven cents/sq.ft. on nonresidential parcels), adjusted annually for inflation, exempting homeowners age 65 and over and low-income taxpayers, with funds for school library and mental health services, science, technology, arts, music courses and athletics, small class sizes, and attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3011, "no_votes": 882, "total_votes": 3893, "percent_yes": 77.34394999999999, "percent_no": 22.656050000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.093803", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.206729", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high quality Albany public schools, shall Albany Unified School District combine, without increasing, three existing special school taxes into a single annual tax of $555/residential unit (eleven cents/sq.ft. on nonresidential parcels), adjusted annually for inflation, exempting homeowners age 65 and over and low-income taxpayers, with funds for school library and mental health services, science, technology, arts, music courses and athletics, small class sizes, and attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6692, "fingerprint": "2009|200900091|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900091|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "40db90fa5c97f2f9", "measure_id": "200900091", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain the high quality of life and unique character of Emeryville, continue to fund emergency services, and fund other vital City services, shall the City of Emeryville increase the business license tax imposed on the business of operating, conducting, or managing a card room, from 9% of gross receipts per month or $1,000.00 per table per month, whichever is greater, to 10% of gross receipts per month or $1,000.00 per table per month, whichever is greater?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1156, "no_votes": 232, "total_votes": 1388, "percent_yes": 83.28529999999999, "percent_no": 16.714700000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.092863", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.206131", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the high quality of life and unique character of Emeryville, continue to fund emergency services, and fund other vital City services, shall the City of Emeryville increase the business license tax imposed on the business of operating, conducting, or managing a card room, from 9% of gross receipts per month or $1,000.00 per table per month, whichever is greater, to 10% of gross receipts per month or $1,000.00 per table per month, whichever is greater?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6693, "fingerprint": "2009|200900092|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900092|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fe365966547bc254", "measure_id": "200900092", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent severe cuts to critical Newark city services, including police officers and patrols, crime prevention, anti gang/drug prevention, fire protection and 911 emergency services, senior services and health programs, programs for children and teens, street maintenance and pothole repair, and general city services, shall the City of Newark establish a 3.9 percent Utility Users Tax for six years exempting low income seniors and requiring independent audits with all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2364, "no_votes": 2354, "total_votes": 4718, "percent_yes": 50.10598, "percent_no": 49.89402, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.093129", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.206315", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent severe cuts to critical Newark city services, including police officers and patrols, crime prevention, anti gang/drug prevention, fire protection and 911 emergency services, senior services and health programs, programs for children and teens, street maintenance and pothole repair, and general city services, shall the City of Newark establish a 3.9 percent Utility Users Tax for six years exempting low income seniors and requiring independent audits with all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6696, "fingerprint": "2009|200900002|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900002|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "9fb6994c8de99089", "measure_id": "200900002", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order of the Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission, adopted on September 18, 2008, as Resolution No. 07- 27, ordering the incorporation of the territory described and designated in Resolution No. 07-27 as the \"Incorporation of the Town of Alamo\", be confirmed, subject to the terms and conditions specified in Resolution No. 07-27?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2468, "no_votes": 4456, "total_votes": 6924, "percent_yes": 35.644135, "percent_no": 64.355865, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.094073", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.206923", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order of the Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission, adopted on September 18, 2008, as Resolution No. 07- 27, ordering the incorporation of the territory described and designated in Resolution No. 07-27 as the \"Incorporation of the Town of Alamo\", be confirmed, subject to the terms and conditions specified in Resolution No. 07-27?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6697, "fingerprint": "2009|200900021|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900021|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3b07f51a1346c2f4", "measure_id": "200900021", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide secure local funding for all Orinda\r\nK-8 students; reduce the impact of state budget cuts; maintain small class sizes and neighborhood schools; attract and retain skilled, qualified teachers with competitive compensation and training; and protect classroom programs and strong core academics, shall the Orinda Union School District be authorized to levy a parcel tax of $124 per year per parcel, with citizen oversight, no funds used for administrators' salaries, and every dollar staying in Orinda Union School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5384, "no_votes": 2226, "total_votes": 7610, "percent_yes": 70.749015, "percent_no": 29.250985, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.094345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.207108", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide secure local funding for all Orinda\r\nK-8 students; reduce the impact of state budget cuts; maintain small class sizes and neighborhood schools; attract and retain skilled, qualified teachers with competitive compensation and training; and protect classroom programs and strong core academics, shall the Orinda Union School District be authorized to levy a parcel tax of $124 per year per parcel, with citizen oversight, no funds used for administrators' salaries, and every dollar staying in Orinda Union School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6698, "fingerprint": "2009|200900036|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900036|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "21ac91b786627bf4", "measure_id": "200900036", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To help maintain academic excellence, retain qualified and experienced teachers, prepare students for college and careers for a global economy with strong math, science and literacy education, shall San Ramon Valley Unified School District renew its expiring education tax at one hundred forty four dollars per parcel for seven years, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrative salaries, an available exemption for persons 65 and older, and all funds spent to support local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30624, "no_votes": 11770, "total_votes": 42394, "percent_yes": 72.23664, "percent_no": 27.763360000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.094613", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.207288", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help maintain academic excellence, retain qualified and experienced teachers, prepare students for college and careers for a global economy with strong math, science and literacy education, shall San Ramon Valley Unified School District renew its expiring education tax at one hundred forty four dollars per parcel for seven years, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no funds for administrative salaries, an available exemption for persons 65 and older, and all funds spent to support local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6699, "fingerprint": "2009|200900054|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900054|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d1bf40bffd5c782b", "measure_id": "200900054", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide all students with a quality education, including reading, writing, math and science; ensure reliable, local funding to protect against harmful state budget cuts; attract and retain quality teachers; maintain vital college and work force preparation programs; and enhance classroom technology; shall the Mount Diablo Unified School District be authorized to levy $99 per parcel annually, with no funding for district office administrator salaries, an exemption for seniors and strict monitoring by an independent citizen oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30155, "no_votes": 20490, "total_votes": 50645, "percent_yes": 59.54191, "percent_no": 40.45809, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.094941", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.207473", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide all students with a quality education, including reading, writing, math and science; ensure reliable, local funding to protect against harmful state budget cuts; attract and retain quality teachers; maintain vital college and work force preparation programs; and enhance classroom technology; shall the Mount Diablo Unified School District be authorized to levy $99 per parcel annually, with no funding for district office administrator salaries, an exemption for seniors and strict monitoring by an independent citizen oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6701, "fingerprint": "2009|200900179|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900179|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "975a319372128669", "measure_id": "200900179", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide stable local funding at our high schools and protect core academic programs from deep State budget cuts; preserve science, mathematics, arts, music and foreign language courses; and maintain library hours, shall Acalanes Union High School District renew and replace its parcel tax with one that continues the current annual rate of one hundred eighty-nine dollars per parcel, with an exemption for seniors, with all funds benefitting local high schools, and with an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28429, "no_votes": 9729, "total_votes": 38158, "percent_yes": 74.50337999999999, "percent_no": 25.496620000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.095481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.207838", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide stable local funding at our high schools and protect core academic programs from deep State budget cuts; preserve science, mathematics, arts, music and foreign language courses; and maintain library hours, shall Acalanes Union High School District renew and replace its parcel tax with one that continues the current annual rate of one hundred eighty-nine dollars per parcel, with an exemption for seniors, with all funds benefitting local high schools, and with an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6702, "fingerprint": "2009|200900180|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900180|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8151a96f5dac9001", "measure_id": "200900180", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide the district with the stable, local funds needed to support high quality education programs, smaller class sizes, classroom technology, libraries and to attract and retain quality teachers, shall the Walnut Creek School District renew its existing special tax of $82 per year beginning July 1, 2010 offering a complete exemption for citizens 65 years and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12807, "no_votes": 4105, "total_votes": 16912, "percent_yes": 75.727296, "percent_no": 24.272704000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.095749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.208018", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the district with the stable, local funds needed to support high quality education programs, smaller class sizes, classroom technology, libraries and to attract and retain quality teachers, shall the Walnut Creek School District renew its existing special tax of $82 per year beginning July 1, 2010 offering a complete exemption for citizens 65 years and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6700, "fingerprint": "2009|200900093|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900093|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "35b797e392c2cce6", "measure_id": "200900093", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance allowing a new two-story retail anchor building, such as a Neiman Marcus store, of approximately half the square footage of the Nordstrom building, in Broadway Plaza at South Main St. and Mt. Diablo Blvd.; increasing the site's floor-to-area ratio limit; and addressing parking and transportation issues by amending the Walnut Creek General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; and approving a Development Agreement, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16446, "no_votes": 6596, "total_votes": 23042, "percent_yes": 71.37401, "percent_no": 28.62599, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:32", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.095211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.207657", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance allowing a new two-story retail anchor building, such as a Neiman Marcus store, of approximately half the square footage of the Nordstrom building, in Broadway Plaza at South Main St. and Mt. Diablo Blvd.; increasing the site's floor-to-area ratio limit; and addressing parking and transportation issues by amending the Walnut Creek General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; and approving a Development Agreement, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6703, "fingerprint": "2009|200900032|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900032|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "22693a77321d47f8", "measure_id": "200900032", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "1) Shall the Showcase Ranches Community Services District increase the special parcel tax by $125.00 per year per parcel commencing in Fiscal Year 2009-2010 to provide road maintenance services, in accordance with District Resolution No. 08-09-01? 2) Shall the amount of the special tax rate and the appropriations limit of the Showcase Ranches Community Services District pursuant to California Constitution Article XIII.B and Government Code Section 7900 et. seq., be increased annually thereafter by a percentage rate based on the consumer price index (CPI) prior calendar year annual average, San Francisco, All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) not to exceed 3% per year if the voters approve the new special parcel tax for road maintenance purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91, "no_votes": 151, "total_votes": 242, "percent_yes": 37.603307, "percent_no": 62.396693, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.096027", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.208205", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "1) Shall the Showcase Ranches Community Services District increase the special parcel tax by $125.00 per year per parcel commencing in Fiscal Year 2009-2010 to provide road maintenance services, in accordance with District Resolution No. 08-09-01? 2) Shall the amount of the special tax rate and the appropriations limit of the Showcase Ranches Community Services District pursuant to California Constitution Article XIII.B and Government Code Section 7900 et. seq., be increased annually thereafter by a percentage rate based on the consumer price index (CPI) prior calendar year annual average, San Francisco, All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) not to exceed 3% per year if the voters approve the new special parcel tax for road maintenance purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6704, "fingerprint": "2009|200900028|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900028|FRESNO", "content_hash": "4c85bc21e878a63b", "measure_id": "200900028", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To restore, maintain and improve essential city services and preserve the safety and character of Clovis, prioritizing police services, fire protection; street/pothole repairs; senior services, parks, youth anti-gang/ drug prevention and recreation programs; expanded neighborhood patrols; graffiti removal, and other general city services/facilities, shall the city sales tax be increased by one cent for ten years, then reduced to three-quarters cent with independent citizen's oversight, annual audits, and all funds under local control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5221, "no_votes": 11098, "total_votes": 16319, "percent_yes": 31.993383, "percent_no": 68.006617, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.096348", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.208391", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore, maintain and improve essential city services and preserve the safety and character of Clovis, prioritizing police services, fire protection; street/pothole repairs; senior services, parks, youth anti-gang/ drug prevention and recreation programs; expanded neighborhood patrols; graffiti removal, and other general city services/facilities, shall the city sales tax be increased by one cent for ten years, then reduced to three-quarters cent with independent citizen's oversight, annual audits, and all funds under local control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6705, "fingerprint": "2009|200900047|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900047|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "52a0fe7181f152be", "measure_id": "200900047", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to fund police and fire services for the citizens of Calexico by implementing a dedicated half cent sales tax for twenty years be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 807, "no_votes": 978, "total_votes": 1785, "percent_yes": 45.210084, "percent_no": 54.789916, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.096619", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.208577", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to fund police and fire services for the citizens of Calexico by implementing a dedicated half cent sales tax for twenty years be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6706, "fingerprint": "2009|200900094|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900094|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "c73da470942ccd1a", "measure_id": "200900094", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed City Charter of the City of El Centro be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1737, "no_votes": 1171, "total_votes": 2908, "percent_yes": 59.731776, "percent_no": 40.268224, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.096945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.208756", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed City Charter of the City of El Centro be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6707, "fingerprint": "2009|200900095|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900095|LAKE", "content_hash": "de220099fd5484d1", "measure_id": "200900095", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Municipal Code of the City of Lakeport be amended to allow for the sale and use of California State Fire Marshal Approved Safe and sane Fireworks within the City of Lakeport?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 594, "no_votes": 387, "total_votes": 981, "percent_yes": 60.55046, "percent_no": 39.44954, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.097215", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.208935", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Municipal Code of the City of Lakeport be amended to allow for the sale and use of California State Fire Marshal Approved Safe and sane Fireworks within the City of Lakeport?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11539, "fingerprint": "2009|200900082|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900082|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d63ed608e64fe9b5", "measure_id": "200900082", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you support having areas in the Santa Clarita Valley including Sunset Pointe, Stevenson Ranch, Southern Oaks, Westridge, Tesoro, Castaic and Val Verde remain as official communities in unincorporated Los Angeles County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1818, "no_votes": 1395, "total_votes": 3213, "percent_yes": 56.582636, "percent_no": 43.417364, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.225494", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.106030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.214650", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you support having areas in the Santa Clarita Valley including Sunset Pointe, Stevenson Ranch, Southern Oaks, Westridge, Tesoro, Castaic and Val Verde remain as official communities in unincorporated Los Angeles County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11537, "fingerprint": "2009|200900069|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900069|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "61ff214cf96a0f5c", "measure_id": "200900069", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to update, with no increase in rates, Arcadia\u2019s existing Utility User\u2019s Tax Ordinance on telephone/telecommunications services to address current and future technologies in order to preserve funding for critical City services, including police and fire protection, paramedic services, library and recreational programs, so that all taxpayers are treated equally regardless of technology used, while maintaining current low income and disabled exemptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2091, "no_votes": 643, "total_votes": 2734, "percent_yes": 76.48135, "percent_no": 23.518649999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.224541", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.104605", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.213704", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to update, with no increase in rates, Arcadia\u2019s existing Utility User\u2019s Tax Ordinance on telephone/telecommunications services to address current and future technologies in order to preserve funding for critical City services, including police and fire protection, paramedic services, library and recreational programs, so that all taxpayers are treated equally regardless of technology used, while maintaining current low income and disabled exemptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11536, "fingerprint": "2009|200900063|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900063|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c29a2ba69a06f55f", "measure_id": "200900063", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide for regular municipal Elections each April and for staggered terms of office for members of the City Council, one of whom shall be elected each year to five year terms; with the extension of terms for one council office currently to be elected in 2010 and one council office currently to be elcted in 2012 to fully effect the staggered elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 42, "percent_yes": 95.238096, "percent_no": 4.761904000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.224355", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.104330", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.213522", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide for regular municipal Elections each April and for staggered terms of office for members of the City Council, one of whom shall be elected each year to five year terms; with the extension of terms for one council office currently to be elected in 2010 and one council office currently to be elcted in 2012 to fully effect the staggered elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11532, "fingerprint": "2009|200900048|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900048|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "92461445709735ab", "measure_id": "200900048", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve essential general city services including: public safety; Sheriff\u2019s deputies; gang/ crime prevention; senior services; job creation; business development; shall the City of Palmdale increase the existing Transient Occupancy Tax, (\u201chotel room tax\u201d), charged only to persons who occupy hotel/ motel rooms in Palmdale, transmitted to the City of Palmdale by those who collect room charges, from 7% to 10%, with expenditures approved through general fund budgets adopted in open public hearings, subject to annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6287, "no_votes": 3529, "total_votes": 9816, "percent_yes": 64.04849, "percent_no": 35.95151, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.223600", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.103220", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.212775", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve essential general city services including: public safety; Sheriff\u2019s deputies; gang/ crime prevention; senior services; job creation; business development; shall the City of Palmdale increase the existing Transient Occupancy Tax, (\u201chotel room tax\u201d), charged only to persons who occupy hotel/ motel rooms in Palmdale, transmitted to the City of Palmdale by those who collect room charges, from 7% to 10%, with expenditures approved through general fund budgets adopted in open public hearings, subject to annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11529, "fingerprint": "2009|200900017|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900017|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "200900017", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1049, "no_votes": 1180, "total_votes": 2229, "percent_yes": 47.06146, "percent_no": 52.93854, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.222462", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.101433", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.211670", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11528, "fingerprint": "2009|200900016|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900016|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1d474274275bdc5a", "measure_id": "200900016", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing the current tax rate, shall an ordinance be adopted to ratifying/continuing Redondo Beach's existing utility users tax funding general city services, including: 9-1 1 response, police, fire, paramedics, street/pothole repairs, parks, libraries, local ocean/beach pollution prevention and youth/ senior services, maintaining low-income seniors/disabled resident exemptions, requiring equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology used, retaining local control, annual audits and public expenditure reviews?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4837, "no_votes": 1635, "total_votes": 6472, "percent_yes": 74.73733, "percent_no": 25.26267, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.222271", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.101160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.211484", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the current tax rate, shall an ordinance be adopted to ratifying/continuing Redondo Beach's existing utility users tax funding general city services, including: 9-1 1 response, police, fire, paramedics, street/pothole repairs, parks, libraries, local ocean/beach pollution prevention and youth/ senior services, maintaining low-income seniors/disabled resident exemptions, requiring equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology used, retaining local control, annual audits and public expenditure reviews?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11526, "fingerprint": "2009|200900011|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900011|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f87b5282a97e68e5", "measure_id": "200900011", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to empower the Board of Fire Commissioners to appoint and remove an Independent Assessor, exempt from Civil Service, who shall be responsible for auditing, assessing and reviewing the Fire Department's handling of complaints against sworn and civilian employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 132037, "no_votes": 116042, "total_votes": 248079, "percent_yes": 53.22377, "percent_no": 46.77623, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.221330", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.099753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.210574", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to empower the Board of Fire Commissioners to appoint and remove an Independent Assessor, exempt from Civil Service, who shall be responsible for auditing, assessing and reviewing the Fire Department's handling of complaints against sworn and civilian employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11525, "fingerprint": "2009|200900010|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900010|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "34c3b0168591ed55", "measure_id": "200900010", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax levied upon hotel/motel\r\nstays and certain other temporary lodging in the City of\r\nLa Mirada be adjusted from 7 percent to 9 percent effective\r\nJanuary 1, 2010, and to 10 percent effective January 1, 2013?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1947, "no_votes": 1131, "total_votes": 3078, "percent_yes": 63.25536, "percent_no": 36.74464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.221133", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.099489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.210389", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax levied upon hotel/motel\r\nstays and certain other temporary lodging in the City of\r\nLa Mirada be adjusted from 7 percent to 9 percent effective\r\nJanuary 1, 2010, and to 10 percent effective January 1, 2013?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11523, "fingerprint": "2009|200900007|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900007|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7cc85a2e1f06fbb4", "measure_id": "200900007", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without raising current tax rates and maintaining the exemptions for low income residents, shall an ordinance be adopted to help preserve funding for critical City services, including police and fire protection, 911 emergency response, senior support services and pothole repairs by updating the utility users tax to include new technologies; treating all taxpayers equally regardless of technology used and requiring public review of expenditures, annual independent audits and no tax increase without voter\r\napproval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2203, "no_votes": 360, "total_votes": 2563, "percent_yes": 85.95396, "percent_no": 14.046040000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.220574", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.098629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.209846", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without raising current tax rates and maintaining the exemptions for low income residents, shall an ordinance be adopted to help preserve funding for critical City services, including police and fire protection, 911 emergency response, senior support services and pothole repairs by updating the utility users tax to include new technologies; treating all taxpayers equally regardless of technology used and requiring public review of expenditures, annual independent audits and no tax increase without voter\r\napproval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6708, "fingerprint": "2009|200900003|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900003|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "54cdc95e4f5913ef", "measure_id": "200900003", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted, without raising tax rates, to continue and modernize Bellflower's utility users' tax on telecommunications services to fund vital services, including Sheriff's services/neighborhood patrols; school safety programs; grafitti removal; gang/drug prevention/enforcement programs; afterschool activities; senior/disabled residents' services; library services; and other general fund services; exempting low-income residents, requiring equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology used, audits, citizen oversight committee, public expenditure review/local control of revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2592, "no_votes": 578, "total_votes": 3170, "percent_yes": 81.766564, "percent_no": 18.233435999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.097483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.209115", "update_count": 11, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted, without raising tax rates, to continue and modernize Bellflower's utility users' tax on telecommunications services to fund vital services, including Sheriff's services/neighborhood patrols; school safety programs; grafitti removal; gang/drug prevention/enforcement programs; afterschool activities; senior/disabled residents' services; library services; and other general fund services; exempting low-income residents, requiring equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology used, audits, citizen oversight committee, public expenditure review/local control of revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11540, "fingerprint": "2009|200900083|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900083|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1fd63ceef0905da4", "measure_id": "200900083", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you support having areas in the Santa Clarita Valley including Sunset Pointe, Stevenson Ranch, Southern Oaks, Westridge, Tesoro, Castaic and Val Verde incorporate into a new separate city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 688, "no_votes": 2386, "total_votes": 3074, "percent_yes": 22.381262, "percent_no": 77.61873800000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.225685", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.106293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.214835", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you support having areas in the Santa Clarita Valley including Sunset Pointe, Stevenson Ranch, Southern Oaks, Westridge, Tesoro, Castaic and Val Verde incorporate into a new separate city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11533, "fingerprint": "2009|200900049|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900049|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "efe2f52ab92ce480", "measure_id": "200900049", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters be allowed to choose, without limitation, those persons whom the voters desire to serve on the City Council, by repealing Ordinance No. 1184 (Palmdale Municipal Code Chapter 4.16) which established term limits for the Mayor and City Councilmembers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5007, "no_votes": 4817, "total_votes": 9824, "percent_yes": 50.96702, "percent_no": 49.03298, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.223789", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.103500", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.212966", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters be allowed to choose, without limitation, those persons whom the voters desire to serve on the City Council, by repealing Ordinance No. 1184 (Palmdale Municipal Code Chapter 4.16) which established term limits for the Mayor and City Councilmembers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6713, "fingerprint": "2009|200900012|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900012|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9c9e85b79b42b829", "measure_id": "200900012", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter and Administrative Code be amended to authorize creation of a Los Angeles Department of Water and Power program to require production of at least 400 megawatts of solar power energy by 2014; provide for voluntary participation in the program by commercial, industrial, and institutional customers to allow installation of solar power systems on their property which would be operated and maintained by the Department in exchange for potential incentives; establish a jobs program and training academy to meet program participation demand; provide contract bid preferences for local solar power equipment manufacturers; require quarterly oversight committee reports and annual City Controller audit; and utilize a variety of funding mechanisms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 129925, "no_votes": 132569, "total_votes": 262494, "percent_yes": 49.49637, "percent_no": 50.50363, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.100020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.210759", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter and Administrative Code be amended to authorize creation of a Los Angeles Department of Water and Power program to require production of at least 400 megawatts of solar power energy by 2014; provide for voluntary participation in the program by commercial, industrial, and institutional customers to allow installation of solar power systems on their property which would be operated and maintained by the Department in exchange for potential incentives; establish a jobs program and training academy to meet program participation demand; provide contract bid preferences for local solar power equipment manufacturers; require quarterly oversight committee reports and annual City Controller audit; and utilize a variety of funding mechanisms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11544, "fingerprint": "2009|200900111|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900111|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e0c959b7a88a5744", "measure_id": "200900111", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you support having areas in the Santa Clarita Valley including Sunset Pointe, Stevenson Ranch, Southern Oaks, Westridge, Tesoro, Castaic and Val Verde negotiate an annexation into the City of Santa Clarita?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1761, "no_votes": 1539, "total_votes": 3300, "percent_yes": 53.36364, "percent_no": 46.63636, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.228714", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.110852", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.217825", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you support having areas in the Santa Clarita Valley including Sunset Pointe, Stevenson Ranch, Southern Oaks, Westridge, Tesoro, Castaic and Val Verde negotiate an annexation into the City of Santa Clarita?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11530, "fingerprint": "2009|200900018|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900018|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d3d2b3843b94e2b0", "measure_id": "200900018", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the terms of members of the City Council be limited to two (2) four (4) year consecutive terms, with a hiatus of two (2) years before being eligible to hold office again as a Member of the City Council? .", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2612, "no_votes": 617, "total_votes": 3229, "percent_yes": 80.89192, "percent_no": 19.10808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.222649", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.101699", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.211848", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the terms of members of the City Council be limited to two (2) four (4) year consecutive terms, with a hiatus of two (2) years before being eligible to hold office again as a Member of the City Council? .", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11527, "fingerprint": "2009|200900013|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900013|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e40756f12879f58b", "measure_id": "200900013", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow disabled children of deceased members of the Fire and Police Pension Plan to marry or be adopted without losing their Dependent Child benefits and to provide additional options for the payment of benefits belonging to disabled children of deceased members that do not increase the amount of the benefits being paid?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 168786, "no_votes": 83134, "total_votes": 251920, "percent_yes": 66.99984, "percent_no": 33.000159999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.221707", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.100340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.210940", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow disabled children of deceased members of the Fire and Police Pension Plan to marry or be adopted without losing their Dependent Child benefits and to provide additional options for the payment of benefits belonging to disabled children of deceased members that do not increase the amount of the benefits being paid?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11524, "fingerprint": "2009|200900008|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900008|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "538d38bac9b7f06a", "measure_id": "200900008", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative entitled \"An initiative to amend the Glendora Commercial Specific Plan (Glendora Municipal Code Chapter 21.08) to allow additional retail uses in planning area B and to increase the building area that could be used for the additional retail uses in planning area B.\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3362, "no_votes": 1465, "total_votes": 4827, "percent_yes": 69.64989, "percent_no": 30.35011, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.220762", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.098953", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.210027", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative entitled \"An initiative to amend the Glendora Commercial Specific Plan (Glendora Municipal Code Chapter 21.08) to allow additional retail uses in planning area B and to increase the building area that could be used for the additional retail uses in planning area B.\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6710, "fingerprint": "2009|200900005|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900005|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "eddfbc54488fa539", "measure_id": "200900005", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to protect residents' health, maintain current levels of city services including deputy sheriff's patrols, 9-1-1 emergency response, youth recreation programs, Meals on Wheels for homebound seniors, Stroke Recovery Center, gang prevention/ intervention programs, graffiti removal, pothole repair, park maintenance, and other general City services, by establishing a 2% utility users' tax, exempting seniors and low-income households, with citizens' oversight and independent annual audits, requiring the ordinance end after 7 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7463, "no_votes": 3287, "total_votes": 10750, "percent_yes": 69.42326, "percent_no": 30.57674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.098086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.209483", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to protect residents' health, maintain current levels of city services including deputy sheriff's patrols, 9-1-1 emergency response, youth recreation programs, Meals on Wheels for homebound seniors, Stroke Recovery Center, gang prevention/ intervention programs, graffiti removal, pothole repair, park maintenance, and other general City services, by establishing a 2% utility users' tax, exempting seniors and low-income households, with citizens' oversight and independent annual audits, requiring the ordinance end after 7 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6729, "fingerprint": "2009|200900106|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900106|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "33cc7a3f8bf079b7", "measure_id": "200900106", "measure_letter": "CH", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the citizens of Palmdale restore home-rule and local control by adopting a city charter to allow the City of Palmdale, rather than the State, the flexibility, discretion, and accountability to control local municipal affairs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6577, "no_votes": 1454, "total_votes": 8031, "percent_yes": 81.895155, "percent_no": 18.104844999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.109485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.216881", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the citizens of Palmdale restore home-rule and local control by adopting a city charter to allow the City of Palmdale, rather than the State, the flexibility, discretion, and accountability to control local municipal affairs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11546, "fingerprint": "2009|200900114|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900114|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "78e98b2f73fef646", "measure_id": "200900114", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of West Covina be elected by districts as described in the proposed ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3359, "no_votes": 5754, "total_votes": 9113, "percent_yes": 36.859432, "percent_no": 63.140568, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.229276", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.111742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.218381", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of West Covina be elected by districts as described in the proposed ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6714, "fingerprint": "2009|200900014|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900014|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b3170d5c79039dec", "measure_id": "200900014", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow retired members of the Fire and Police Pension Plan to purchase, at their own expense, a survivor benefit for a spouse or domestic partner?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 176950, "no_votes": 73212, "total_votes": 250162, "percent_yes": 70.73416999999999, "percent_no": 29.26583000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.100621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.211121", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow retired members of the Fire and Police Pension Plan to purchase, at their own expense, a survivor benefit for a spouse or domestic partner?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11543, "fingerprint": "2009|200900100|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900100|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "19af02d36448ec86", "measure_id": "200900100", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 840-NS be adopted to increase the existing Utility Users\u2019 and Communication Users\u2019 Tax rates by 2.75% in order to maintain a flow of revenues necessary to fund essential city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 590, "no_votes": 540, "total_votes": 1130, "percent_yes": 52.21239, "percent_no": 47.78761, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.226648", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.107685", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.215765", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 840-NS be adopted to increase the existing Utility Users\u2019 and Communication Users\u2019 Tax rates by 2.75% in order to maintain a flow of revenues necessary to fund essential city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11538, "fingerprint": "2009|200900073|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900073|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "158313209f464b44", "measure_id": "200900073", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent deep cuts in local educational programs, including: maintaining college preparation classes,\r\nhigh school counselors, student health/safety/security services, adequate instructional supplies and classroom technology; keeping school libraries open; protecting small class sizes and music/art programs; and retaining qualified teachers; shall Rowland Unified School District levy an annual $120 tax per parcel, for 5 years only, with independent oversight, and exemption for seniors, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting Rowland Unified schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4482, "no_votes": 4072, "total_votes": 8554, "percent_yes": 52.39654, "percent_no": 47.60346, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-30", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.225309", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.105764", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.214463", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent deep cuts in local educational programs, including: maintaining college preparation classes,\r\nhigh school counselors, student health/safety/security services, adequate instructional supplies and classroom technology; keeping school libraries open; protecting small class sizes and music/art programs; and retaining qualified teachers; shall Rowland Unified School District levy an annual $120 tax per parcel, for 5 years only, with independent oversight, and exemption for seniors, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting Rowland Unified schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11534, "fingerprint": "2009|200900061|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900061|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ece8b6cab7609a92", "measure_id": "200900061", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to change the date of the Primary Nominating Election to the first Tuesday in April in odd-numbered years, to be known as the \"General Municipal election\"; and change the date of the General Municipal election to the third Tuesday in June in odd-numbered years, to be known as the \"Municipal Run-off Election\", commencing in 2011?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1051, "no_votes": 1223, "total_votes": 2274, "percent_yes": 46.218118, "percent_no": 53.781882, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.223978", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.103795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.213152", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to change the date of the Primary Nominating Election to the first Tuesday in April in odd-numbered years, to be known as the \"General Municipal election\"; and change the date of the General Municipal election to the third Tuesday in June in odd-numbered years, to be known as the \"Municipal Run-off Election\", commencing in 2011?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11531, "fingerprint": "2009|200900037|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900037|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "38096bdb069bb7c5", "measure_id": "200900037", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To mitigate the cuts in the San Marino Unified School District\u2019s educational program that will result from a\r\npotential $5 million budget shortfall caused by state budget cuts, to preserve teachers, core academic curriculum, advanced placement and honors classes, arts and athletic programs, and minimize increases in class sizes, shall the San Marino Unified School District authorize a $795 annual education parcel tax, as adjusted, for six (6) years, that will exempt seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3476, "no_votes": 1407, "total_votes": 4883, "percent_yes": 71.185744, "percent_no": 28.814256, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.223409", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.102778", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.212573", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To mitigate the cuts in the San Marino Unified School District\u2019s educational program that will result from a\r\npotential $5 million budget shortfall caused by state budget cuts, to preserve teachers, core academic curriculum, advanced placement and honors classes, arts and athletic programs, and minimize increases in class sizes, shall the San Marino Unified School District authorize a $795 annual education parcel tax, as adjusted, for six (6) years, that will exempt seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6715, "fingerprint": "2009|200900015|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900015|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d4f507237a3a5334", "measure_id": "200900015", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Los Angeles City Charter be amended to clearly express the authority of the City of Los Angeles to provide incentives to businesses that will encourage economic development and provide public benefits to the City of Los Angeles and its residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 119943, "no_votes": 131272, "total_votes": 251215, "percent_yes": 47.74516, "percent_no": 52.25484, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.100893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.211304", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Los Angeles City Charter be amended to clearly express the authority of the City of Los Angeles to provide incentives to businesses that will encourage economic development and provide public benefits to the City of Los Angeles and its residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6735, "fingerprint": "2009|200900181|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900181|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e9609d41ca24a856", "measure_id": "200900181", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect the quality of education in Culver City schools from deep State budget cuts by providing stable local funding to maintain: math, science, technology, music and art programs; updated instructional materials; quality teachers; school libraries; and small class sizes; shall Culver City Unified School District levy an annual tax of $96.00 per parcel for 5 years only, with exemptions for seniors, independent oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying in Culver City to benefit our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3729, "no_votes": 1248, "total_votes": 4977, "percent_yes": 74.924654, "percent_no": 25.075345999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.112015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.218565", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of education in Culver City schools from deep State budget cuts by providing stable local funding to maintain: math, science, technology, music and art programs; updated instructional materials; quality teachers; school libraries; and small class sizes; shall Culver City Unified School District levy an annual tax of $96.00 per parcel for 5 years only, with exemptions for seniors, independent oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds staying in Culver City to benefit our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6717, "fingerprint": "2009|200900030|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900030|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1d65448c54a1e608", "measure_id": "200900030", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to add a new Section 1704 to ban the possession, storage, sale and/or use of all fireworks within the City of Compton?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1582, "no_votes": 2043, "total_votes": 3625, "percent_yes": 43.641380000000005, "percent_no": 56.358619999999995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-04-24", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.102231", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.212214", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to add a new Section 1704 to ban the possession, storage, sale and/or use of all fireworks within the City of Compton?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6712, "fingerprint": "2009|200900009|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900009|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "50217e526b907c79", "measure_id": "200900009", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to renew the City's authority to spend existing revenues from the special fire tax approved by two-thirds of the City's voters in 1997 to provide essential fire and life-safety services by renewing the voter-approved amendment to the City's appropriations limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 893, "no_votes": 201, "total_votes": 1094, "percent_yes": 81.62706, "percent_no": 18.37294, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.099221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.210209", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to renew the City's authority to spend existing revenues from the special fire tax approved by two-thirds of the City's voters in 1997 to provide essential fire and life-safety services by renewing the voter-approved amendment to the City's appropriations limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11545, "fingerprint": "2009|200900113|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900113|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c613a8f3a102e52f", "measure_id": "200900113", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted extending the Library Special Tax, which is due to expire on June 30, 2011, for an additional 5 years until June 30, 2016, to provide funding for the maintenance and operations of the South Pasadena Public Library at the current level of library services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3031, "no_votes": 758, "total_votes": 3789, "percent_yes": 79.99472, "percent_no": 20.00528, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.229086", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.111394", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.218195", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted extending the Library Special Tax, which is due to expire on June 30, 2011, for an additional 5 years until June 30, 2016, to provide funding for the maintenance and operations of the South Pasadena Public Library at the current level of library services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6718, "fingerprint": "2009|200900031|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900031|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "49ebfd92659658de", "measure_id": "200900031", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended at various sections to delete obsolete and unclear language and to conform to current law and existing City policies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2357, "no_votes": 1152, "total_votes": 3509, "percent_yes": 67.17013, "percent_no": 32.82987, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-04-24", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.102499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.212392", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended at various sections to delete obsolete and unclear language and to conform to current law and existing City policies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6721, "fingerprint": "2009|200900072|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900072|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f601961f7ea88933", "measure_id": "200900072", "measure_letter": "LC", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect La Ca\u00f1ada schools from uncontrollable state budget cuts and preserve quality education through temporary local funding to sustain rigorous curriculum and instruction; attract and retain superior teachers; limit increased class sizes; maintain programs that ensure students are prepared to succeed in college and careers; and protect property values, shall La Ca\u00f1ada Unified School District levy $150 per parcel for five years, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, exemptions for seniors, and all funds staying under local control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4849, "no_votes": 1640, "total_votes": 6489, "percent_yes": 74.72645999999999, "percent_no": 25.27354000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-30", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.105487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.214266", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect La Ca\u00f1ada schools from uncontrollable state budget cuts and preserve quality education through temporary local funding to sustain rigorous curriculum and instruction; attract and retain superior teachers; limit increased class sizes; maintain programs that ensure students are prepared to succeed in college and careers; and protect property values, shall La Ca\u00f1ada Unified School District levy $150 per parcel for five years, with independent citizens\u2019 oversight, exemptions for seniors, and all funds staying under local control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6728, "fingerprint": "2009|200900105|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900105|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "54dc48426a10a062", "measure_id": "200900105", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to protect and preserve legal control over the City's by requiring an approval of the voters of not less than fifty-five percent (55%) before the services may be performed by any public entity other than the City of Montebello?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4101, "no_votes": 928, "total_votes": 5029, "percent_yes": 81.54702999999999, "percent_no": 18.452970000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.109209", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.216699", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to protect and preserve legal control over the City's by requiring an approval of the voters of not less than fifty-five percent (55%) before the services may be performed by any public entity other than the City of Montebello?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6726, "fingerprint": "2009|200900103|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900103|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "80edc52bcbacb4ff", "measure_id": "200900103", "measure_letter": "MS", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Los Angeles Unified School District acquire, by negotiated sale or eminent domain, 10 single family parcels, 29 multi-family parcels, 7 commercial parcels and 1 vacant parcel within a site bounded by Slauson Avenue to the south, 57th Avenue to the north, King Avenue to the west and Mayflower Avenue to the east for the construction of the new South Region No. 8 High School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 498, "no_votes": 1370, "total_votes": 1868, "percent_yes": 26.659527, "percent_no": 73.340473, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.108634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.216329", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Los Angeles Unified School District acquire, by negotiated sale or eminent domain, 10 single family parcels, 29 multi-family parcels, 7 commercial parcels and 1 vacant parcel within a site bounded by Slauson Avenue to the south, 57th Avenue to the north, King Avenue to the west and Mayflower Avenue to the east for the construction of the new South Region No. 8 High School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11542, "fingerprint": "2009|200900098|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900098|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0d4aa9bdbb1d0dfa", "measure_id": "200900098", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of El Monte reorganize the City Council by replacing the current structure of one elected Mayor and four elected City Council members with a new structure composed of five elected City Council members who will share the title of Mayor on a rotating basis?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2382, "no_votes": 3328, "total_votes": 5710, "percent_yes": 41.716287, "percent_no": 58.283713, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.226258", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.107145", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.215395", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of El Monte reorganize the City Council by replacing the current structure of one elected Mayor and four elected City Council members with a new structure composed of five elected City Council members who will share the title of Mayor on a rotating basis?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11535, "fingerprint": "2009|200900062|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900062|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d335a531f9ca0ecf", "measure_id": "200900062", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 500 of the City Charter be amended to divide the City into six (6) Districts for the purpose of electing members of the Council when the City's population exceeds 150,000 residents rather than 100,000 residents, as currently provided?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 932, "no_votes": 1342, "total_votes": 2274, "percent_yes": 40.985048, "percent_no": 59.014952, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.224169", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.104063", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.213338", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 500 of the City Charter be amended to divide the City into six (6) Districts for the purpose of electing members of the Council when the City's population exceeds 150,000 residents rather than 100,000 residents, as currently provided?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6709, "fingerprint": "2009|200900004|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900004|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "11e0d8a45fc441fb", "measure_id": "200900004", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance that amends the method for calculating certain business taxes in the City of Beverly Hills to increase locally controlled revenue for city services and operations?such as, police, fire, paramedics, parks, and street repair?by converting the per barrel flat tax on oil companies, and the per employee flat tax on certain other businesses?including, professionals and commercial parking operations ?to taxes based on gross receipts or gross payroll, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1163, "no_votes": 4559, "total_votes": 5722, "percent_yes": 20.325062, "percent_no": 79.674938, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.097815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.209303", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance that amends the method for calculating certain business taxes in the City of Beverly Hills to increase locally controlled revenue for city services and operations?such as, police, fire, paramedics, parks, and street repair?by converting the per barrel flat tax on oil companies, and the per employee flat tax on certain other businesses?including, professionals and commercial parking operations ?to taxes based on gross receipts or gross payroll, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6731, "fingerprint": "2009|200900108|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900108|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "07e7dc797b535a5a", "measure_id": "200900108", "measure_letter": "PC", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to ratify and continue Pomona's existing Utility Users Tax to fund general city services, including essential municipal services such as, police, fire, street repair, parks and libraries, provided that current exemptions remain, and the ordinance is updated to treat taxpayers equally regardless of telecommunication technology used?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3019, "no_votes": 2006, "total_votes": 5025, "percent_yes": 60.079604, "percent_no": 39.920396, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.110037", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.217251", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to ratify and continue Pomona's existing Utility Users Tax to fund general city services, including essential municipal services such as, police, fire, street repair, parks and libraries, provided that current exemptions remain, and the ordinance is updated to treat taxpayers equally regardless of telecommunication technology used?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6711, "fingerprint": "2009|200900006|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900006|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "70e4677ce684e542", "measure_id": "200900006", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the tax rate from 4% to 3.75% on residential Telecommunications Utility Users' Tax; to modernize the code to reflect changes in federal law; and to treat all taxpayers equally regardless of technology used?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 972, "no_votes": 111, "total_votes": 1083, "percent_yes": 89.75069500000001, "percent_no": 10.249304999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.098359", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.209666", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the tax rate from 4% to 3.75% on residential Telecommunications Utility Users' Tax; to modernize the code to reflect changes in federal law; and to treat all taxpayers equally regardless of technology used?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6723, "fingerprint": "2009|200900099|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900099|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d55b8e4034def72b", "measure_id": "200900099", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of El Monte institute an overnight parking regulatory program that would prohibit overnight street parking on most City streets between the hours of 3:00 A.M. and 5:00 A.M., subject to limited exceptions, including instances where residents and nonresidents alike have purchased special street parking permits issued by the City.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2230, "no_votes": 3503, "total_votes": 5733, "percent_yes": 38.89761, "percent_no": 61.10239, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.107409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.215582", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of El Monte institute an overnight parking regulatory program that would prohibit overnight street parking on most City streets between the hours of 3:00 A.M. and 5:00 A.M., subject to limited exceptions, including instances where residents and nonresidents alike have purchased special street parking permits issued by the City.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11547, "fingerprint": "2009|200900182|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900182|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "228c3bb433ad9646", "measure_id": "200900182", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve quality neighborhood schools despite severe state budget cuts by retaining superior teachers, maintaining small class sizes, vocational/job training, college prep, essential academic and after school programs, and protect property values, shall Long Beach Unified School District levy a $92 annual education parcel tax, for five years, requiring senior exemptions, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators and funding only for neighborhood schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15939, "no_votes": 20391, "total_votes": 36330, "percent_yes": 43.872833, "percent_no": 56.127167, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.229747", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.112349", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.218751", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve quality neighborhood schools despite severe state budget cuts by retaining superior teachers, maintaining small class sizes, vocational/job training, college prep, essential academic and after school programs, and protect property values, shall Long Beach Unified School District levy a $92 annual education parcel tax, for five years, requiring senior exemptions, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators and funding only for neighborhood schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11541, "fingerprint": "2009|200900096|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900096|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4230f22eb24a7085", "measure_id": "200900096", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 09-749, which increases the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 12.5%, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 489, "no_votes": 477, "total_votes": 966, "percent_yes": 50.621116, "percent_no": 49.378884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.225872", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.106559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.215016", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 09-749, which increases the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 12.5%, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6719, "fingerprint": "2009|200900070|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900070|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5668b9bdaf253760", "measure_id": "200900070", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe cuts in State funding for schools and protect the quality of education; to help prevent teacher layoffs, class size increases, and cuts including libraries, arts, music, and classroom academics, shall the South Pasadena Unified School District levy an annual special tax for four years at $95/unit in multi-unit parcels and $288 for other parcels, with a senior exemption; independent, citizens oversight committee; no funds for administrator salaries; and with every dollar staying in South Pasadena schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4158, "no_votes": 1993, "total_votes": 6151, "percent_yes": 67.598766, "percent_no": 32.401234, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-16", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.104880", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.213895", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe cuts in State funding for schools and protect the quality of education; to help prevent teacher layoffs, class size increases, and cuts including libraries, arts, music, and classroom academics, shall the South Pasadena Unified School District levy an annual special tax for four years at $95/unit in multi-unit parcels and $288 for other parcels, with a senior exemption; independent, citizens oversight committee; no funds for administrator salaries; and with every dollar staying in South Pasadena schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6727, "fingerprint": "2009|200900104|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900104|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "543c414e74616c53", "measure_id": "200900104", "measure_letter": "SC", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Los Angeles Unified School District fully and adequately investigate the selection of other sites for the construction of the new South Region No. 8 High School, including alternative sites that were previously recommended by the City of Maywood and the community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1320, "no_votes": 512, "total_votes": 1832, "percent_yes": 72.0524, "percent_no": 27.947599999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.108932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.216511", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Los Angeles Unified School District fully and adequately investigate the selection of other sites for the construction of the new South Region No. 8 High School, including alternative sites that were previously recommended by the City of Maywood and the community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6734, "fingerprint": "2009|200900112|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900112|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "200900112", "measure_letter": "SE", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 693, "no_votes": 503, "total_votes": 1196, "percent_yes": 57.94314000000001, "percent_no": 42.05685999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.111124", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.218013", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6724, "fingerprint": "2009|200900101|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900101|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6c12e1fa22c64382", "measure_id": "200900101", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve the safety and character in all neighborhoods in the City of Irwindale through general City services, which may include funding for police, fire protection, street repair, park maintenance, and recreational services, shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a ten percent charge on the room rate paid by persons who occupy hotel or motel rooms within the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 317, "no_votes": 58, "total_votes": 375, "percent_yes": 84.53333400000001, "percent_no": 15.46666599999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.107952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.215952", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve the safety and character in all neighborhoods in the City of Irwindale through general City services, which may include funding for police, fire protection, street repair, park maintenance, and recreational services, shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a ten percent charge on the room rate paid by persons who occupy hotel or motel rooms within the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6732, "fingerprint": "2009|200900109|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900109|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5910a5d930d3b8d2", "measure_id": "200900109", "measure_letter": "TOT", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the rate of the City\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3062, "no_votes": 3200, "total_votes": 6262, "percent_yes": 48.898116, "percent_no": 51.101884, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.110309", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.217436", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the rate of the City\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6730, "fingerprint": "2009|200900107|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900107|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ff7108471c84428e", "measure_id": "200900107", "measure_letter": "TR", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to decrease the existing Utility Users Tax by one half of one percent (0.5%) and to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Utility Users Tax to reflect technological advances and changes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3119, "no_votes": 1494, "total_votes": 4613, "percent_yes": 67.61327, "percent_no": 32.38673, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.109760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.217069", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to decrease the existing Utility Users Tax by one half of one percent (0.5%) and to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Utility Users Tax to reflect technological advances and changes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6725, "fingerprint": "2009|200900102|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900102|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "13c17aa9f2f34237", "measure_id": "200900102", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve the safety and character of the City of Irwindale through general City services such as law enforcement, fire protection, street repair, park maintenance, and recreational services, shall the City\u2019s existing utility users\u2019 tax be ratified and broadened to apply to changes in technology and laws since it was instituted in 1977, while maintaining an exemption for low-volume utility users?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 305, "no_votes": 67, "total_votes": 372, "percent_yes": 81.98924699999999, "percent_no": 18.01075300000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.108227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.216135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve the safety and character of the City of Irwindale through general City services such as law enforcement, fire protection, street repair, park maintenance, and recreational services, shall the City\u2019s existing utility users\u2019 tax be ratified and broadened to apply to changes in technology and laws since it was instituted in 1977, while maintaining an exemption for low-volume utility users?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6733, "fingerprint": "2009|200900110|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900110|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d2cea84654c843a4", "measure_id": "200900110", "measure_letter": "UU", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential City services shall an ordinance be adopted amending the City\u2019s utility users\u2019 tax to remove an exclusion that currently allows an electrical plant owned by a corporation to pay no utility users\u2019 tax on natural gas, with annual audits, public review of all expenditures and without raising individual taxpayers\u2019 taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3601, "no_votes": 4093, "total_votes": 7694, "percent_yes": 46.802703, "percent_no": 53.197297, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.110584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.217633", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential City services shall an ordinance be adopted amending the City\u2019s utility users\u2019 tax to remove an exclusion that currently allows an electrical plant owned by a corporation to pay no utility users\u2019 tax on natural gas, with annual audits, public review of all expenditures and without raising individual taxpayers\u2019 taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6716, "fingerprint": "2009|200900029|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900029|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a7b11d6986861905", "measure_id": "200900029", "measure_letter": "UUT", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Utility Users Tax to reduce the tax rate on communications users from 7% to 6.5%; assure that users of current and future\r\ncommunications technologies be treated fairly; preserve funding for essential municipal services like police, fire protection, parks and libraries; continue providing tax exemption for low-income and disabled residents; and prohibit any utility users tax rate increase without voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11867, "no_votes": 5956, "total_votes": 17823, "percent_yes": 66.582507, "percent_no": 33.41749299999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-04-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.101965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.212031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Utility Users Tax to reduce the tax rate on communications users from 7% to 6.5%; assure that users of current and future\r\ncommunications technologies be treated fairly; preserve funding for essential municipal services like police, fire protection, parks and libraries; continue providing tax exemption for low-income and disabled residents; and prohibit any utility users tax rate increase without voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6720, "fingerprint": "2009|200900071|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900071|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6c668cbfcd69c1a3", "measure_id": "200900071", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect the high quality of education in Palos Verdes schools, prevent deep cuts to educational programs including math, science, technology, PE, music and art; retain qualified teachers/school employees; keep school facilities well-maintained; and continue programs that promote student achievement and success in college/careers; shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District levy $165 per parcel for four years only, with independent citizen oversight, an exemption for senior citizens, and all money staying locally to benefit our schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12301, "no_votes": 5555, "total_votes": 17856, "percent_yes": 68.89001, "percent_no": 31.109989999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.105147", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.214083", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the high quality of education in Palos Verdes schools, prevent deep cuts to educational programs including math, science, technology, PE, music and art; retain qualified teachers/school employees; keep school facilities well-maintained; and continue programs that promote student achievement and success in college/careers; shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District levy $165 per parcel for four years only, with independent citizen oversight, an exemption for senior citizens, and all money staying locally to benefit our schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6722, "fingerprint": "2009|200900097|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900097|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "be5b300f45333b04", "measure_id": "200900097", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 09-750, which increases business license taxes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 484, "no_votes": 494, "total_votes": 978, "percent_yes": 49.488753, "percent_no": 50.511247, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.106871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.215208", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 09-750, which increases business license taxes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6736, "fingerprint": "2009|200900044|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900044|MADERA", "content_hash": "dfa293065dfd7405", "measure_id": "200900044", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance of the County of Madera be increased from nine percent (9%) to eleven percent (11%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3070, "no_votes": 9530, "total_votes": 12600, "percent_yes": 24.36508, "percent_no": 75.63492, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.112640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.218946", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance of the County of Madera be increased from nine percent (9%) to eleven percent (11%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11550, "fingerprint": "2009|200900183|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900183|MARIN", "content_hash": "2a7fb1c43096bce1", "measure_id": "200900183", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Lagunitas Elementary School District maintain vital educational programs currently threatened by cuts in state funding including basic educational programs, enrichment and support services for students, by levying a $325 assessment per assessor's parcel per year, with a 6.5% yearly cost-of-living adjustment for eight years, beginning July 1, 2010, exempting any single parcel used as a principal place of residence by any owner 65 years of age before May 1st of that year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 816, "no_votes": 394, "total_votes": 1210, "percent_yes": 67.43802, "percent_no": 32.561980000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.231821", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.114873", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.221432", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lagunitas Elementary School District maintain vital educational programs currently threatened by cuts in state funding including basic educational programs, enrichment and support services for students, by levying a $325 assessment per assessor's parcel per year, with a 6.5% yearly cost-of-living adjustment for eight years, beginning July 1, 2010, exempting any single parcel used as a principal place of residence by any owner 65 years of age before May 1st of that year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11549, "fingerprint": "2009|200900079|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900079|MARIN", "content_hash": "aec218c29f7f31aa", "measure_id": "200900079", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain open space, reduce wildland fire hazards, maintain and improve trails and parks, and to renovate and update the Community Center to make it safe and accessible to all within County Service Area #14 \u2013 Homestead Valley \u2013 shall a special tax in the amount of $125 per year per improved parcel with an annual inflation increase of 2 percent, be levied commencing in fiscal year 2009/2010?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 537, "no_votes": 259, "total_votes": 796, "percent_yes": 67.462313, "percent_no": 32.537687000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-08-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.230497", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.113458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.219497", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain open space, reduce wildland fire hazards, maintain and improve trails and parks, and to renovate and update the Community Center to make it safe and accessible to all within County Service Area #14 \u2013 Homestead Valley \u2013 shall a special tax in the amount of $125 per year per improved parcel with an annual inflation increase of 2 percent, be levied commencing in fiscal year 2009/2010?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11548, "fingerprint": "2009|200900067|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900067|MARIN", "content_hash": "664f182aa0e5f8b6", "measure_id": "200900067", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect Novato schools from damaging state budget cuts, provide stable local funding that can't be taken away by the state and preserve quality education by minimizing further teacher and staff layoffs, keeping school libraries open, limiting class size increases, and maintaining competitive science, math and other programs, shall Novato Unified School District increase the existing school parcel tax by $96 per parcel for 6 years, with a senior exemption, independent oversight and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9929, "no_votes": 4519, "total_votes": 14448, "percent_yes": 68.722314, "percent_no": 31.277686000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.230310", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.113182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.219312", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect Novato schools from damaging state budget cuts, provide stable local funding that can't be taken away by the state and preserve quality education by minimizing further teacher and staff layoffs, keeping school libraries open, limiting class size increases, and maintaining competitive science, math and other programs, shall Novato Unified School District increase the existing school parcel tax by $96 per parcel for 6 years, with a senior exemption, independent oversight and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6737, "fingerprint": "2009|200900022|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900022|MARIN", "content_hash": "ec8dbeb2ad1dd9d9", "measure_id": "200900022", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District continue funding quality educational programs by levying a special tax assessment of $250.00 per year per assessor's parcel for a limited period of five (5) years, beginning July 1, 2009, with an exemption for any beneficial owner of a parcel who has attained the age of 65 on or before May 1 of any applicable year, who uses that parcel as his or her principal residence?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 569, "no_votes": 188, "total_votes": 757, "percent_yes": 75.16512, "percent_no": 24.83488, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.112914", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.219129", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District continue funding quality educational programs by levying a special tax assessment of $250.00 per year per assessor's parcel for a limited period of five (5) years, beginning July 1, 2009, with an exemption for any beneficial owner of a parcel who has attained the age of 65 on or before May 1 of any applicable year, who uses that parcel as his or her principal residence?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6742, "fingerprint": "2009|200900184|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900184|MARIN", "content_hash": "30573b1705beacbb", "measure_id": "200900184", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality public education in Corte Madera and Larkspur through continued support for exceptional instructional programs, small class sizes, and highly qualified teachers, shall Larkspur School District be authorized to replace the existing assessment by renewing a parcel tax at the current rate of $368.88 per year for each singlefamily residential parcel, and at rates specified in the sample ballot for all other parcels, for eight years, with a 5% annual adjustment and allow senior exemptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3021, "no_votes": 1246, "total_votes": 4267, "percent_yes": 70.799154, "percent_no": 29.200846, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.115140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.221738", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality public education in Corte Madera and Larkspur through continued support for exceptional instructional programs, small class sizes, and highly qualified teachers, shall Larkspur School District be authorized to replace the existing assessment by renewing a parcel tax at the current rate of $368.88 per year for each singlefamily residential parcel, and at rates specified in the sample ballot for all other parcels, for eight years, with a 5% annual adjustment and allow senior exemptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6743, "fingerprint": "2009|200900185|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900185|MARIN", "content_hash": "55dca178eb4e8e5a", "measure_id": "200900185", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reconstruct and modernize Mill Valley elementary and middle schools, including installing and constructing fire safety, emergency communications, seismic and disabled access improvements; providing sufficient space for students; and repairing or replacing outdated plumbing, electrical and other vital systems and facilities, shall the Mill Valley School District be authorized to issue $59,800,000 in bonds for Phase 1 of the approved Facilities Master Plan, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to ensure all expenditures are made according to the plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5530, "no_votes": 2731, "total_votes": 8261, "percent_yes": 66.941047, "percent_no": 33.058953, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.115413", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.221932", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reconstruct and modernize Mill Valley elementary and middle schools, including installing and constructing fire safety, emergency communications, seismic and disabled access improvements; providing sufficient space for students; and repairing or replacing outdated plumbing, electrical and other vital systems and facilities, shall the Mill Valley School District be authorized to issue $59,800,000 in bonds for Phase 1 of the approved Facilities Master Plan, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to ensure all expenditures are made according to the plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6744, "fingerprint": "2009|200900186|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900186|MARIN", "content_hash": "e898e74075642481", "measure_id": "200900186", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and provide a safe learning environment for our children by performing seismic upgrades, modernizing school facilities, replacing outdated portable classrooms and repaying outstanding debt incurred from past school construction projects, shall Shoreline Unified School District issue $9,290,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits with accountability provided by a citizens' oversight committee and independent audit of expenditure of funds, with no funds used for administrators' or teachers' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 751, "no_votes": 298, "total_votes": 1049, "percent_yes": 71.59199000000001, "percent_no": 28.40800999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.115679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.222186", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and provide a safe learning environment for our children by performing seismic upgrades, modernizing school facilities, replacing outdated portable classrooms and repaying outstanding debt incurred from past school construction projects, shall Shoreline Unified School District issue $9,290,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits with accountability provided by a citizens' oversight committee and independent audit of expenditure of funds, with no funds used for administrators' or teachers' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6739, "fingerprint": "2009|200900116|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900116|MARIN", "content_hash": "a605f868a00089da", "measure_id": "200900116", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance of the San Anselmo Town Council establishing maximum floor area and maximum lot coverage for single family properties located below 150 feet mean sea level elevation be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1980, "no_votes": 1775, "total_votes": 3755, "percent_yes": 52.729696, "percent_no": 47.270304, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.114001", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.220592", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance of the San Anselmo Town Council establishing maximum floor area and maximum lot coverage for single family properties located below 150 feet mean sea level elevation be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6740, "fingerprint": "2009|200900117|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900117|MARIN", "content_hash": "807ea5d67607a1c0", "measure_id": "200900117", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a uniform hotel users tax of 10% on hotel rooms in San Anselmo to be paid by hotel guests with the revenue to be used for Town general purposes, which if approved, shall be effective July 1, 2010?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1485, "no_votes": 2258, "total_votes": 3743, "percent_yes": 39.67406, "percent_no": 60.32594, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.114267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.220920", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a uniform hotel users tax of 10% on hotel rooms in San Anselmo to be paid by hotel guests with the revenue to be used for Town general purposes, which if approved, shall be effective July 1, 2010?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6741, "fingerprint": "2009|200900118|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900118|MARIN", "content_hash": "c8dc50bdbeead58f", "measure_id": "200900118", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect the safety of San Rafael residents and maintain rapid emergency response by upgrading/replacing aging police/fire stations and related city facilities to accommodate modern firefighting/lifesaving emergency medical equipment and provide an earthquake-safe dispatch center and police/fire stations so emergency communications and police/fire/paramedic units remain operational in disasters, shall the City of San Rafael issue $88 million in bonds with independent oversight, no money for administrators and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6645, "no_votes": 4246, "total_votes": 10891, "percent_yes": 61.01368, "percent_no": 38.98632, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.114596", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.221148", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the safety of San Rafael residents and maintain rapid emergency response by upgrading/replacing aging police/fire stations and related city facilities to accommodate modern firefighting/lifesaving emergency medical equipment and provide an earthquake-safe dispatch center and police/fire stations so emergency communications and police/fire/paramedic units remain operational in disasters, shall the City of San Rafael issue $88 million in bonds with independent oversight, no money for administrators and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6738, "fingerprint": "2009|200900115|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900115|MARIN", "content_hash": "4f67cf863ca271c9", "measure_id": "200900115", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted approving the renewal of a special Fairfax municipal services tax of $125 per year for each business occupancy and dwelling unit, for a period of five years to:  Maintain 24-hour, 7 days per week staffing of Police and Fire Services - Perform Public Works safety improvements -Provide matching funds for state and federal grants -Revitalize Youth Programs and continue citizens' oversight committee that monitors the use of revenues from this tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1796, "no_votes": 648, "total_votes": 2444, "percent_yes": 73.48609, "percent_no": 26.513909999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.113735", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.220220", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted approving the renewal of a special Fairfax municipal services tax of $125 per year for each business occupancy and dwelling unit, for a period of five years to:  Maintain 24-hour, 7 days per week staffing of Police and Fire Services - Perform Public Works safety improvements -Provide matching funds for state and federal grants -Revitalize Youth Programs and continue citizens' oversight committee that monitors the use of revenues from this tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6745, "fingerprint": "2009|200900084|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900084|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "4ca6a51fa1625c59", "measure_id": "200900084", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance titled an initiative to enact a general plan and zoning code amendment, and mixed-use specific plan for the former site of the masonite facility be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9022, "no_votes": 15292, "total_votes": 24314, "percent_yes": 37.106195, "percent_no": 62.893805, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.115941", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.222514", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance titled an initiative to enact a general plan and zoning code amendment, and mixed-use specific plan for the former site of the masonite facility be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6746, "fingerprint": "2009|200900119|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900119|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "200900119", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 548, "no_votes": 431, "total_votes": 979, "percent_yes": 55.975485000000006, "percent_no": 44.024514999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.116300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.222823", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6748, "fingerprint": "2009|200900121|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900121|MERCED", "content_hash": "c7587b5acd13fb7f", "measure_id": "200900121", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help prevent further cuts to neighborhood police officers/anti- gang units, firefighters/EMTs, maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, shall Los Banos voters temporarily modify the Measure P Expenditure Plan for no more than 5 years, to officer and firefighter positions while maintaining citizens oversight, independent annual audits, keeping all funds exclusively for Los Banos without raising taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2387, "no_votes": 508, "total_votes": 2895, "percent_yes": 82.452506, "percent_no": 17.547494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.116856", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.223416", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help prevent further cuts to neighborhood police officers/anti- gang units, firefighters/EMTs, maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, shall Los Banos voters temporarily modify the Measure P Expenditure Plan for no more than 5 years, to officer and firefighter positions while maintaining citizens oversight, independent annual audits, keeping all funds exclusively for Los Banos without raising taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6747, "fingerprint": "2009|200900120|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900120|MERCED", "content_hash": "eb370bb8f78c94b6", "measure_id": "200900120", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain public safety and community services including, but not limited to, maintaining an adequate number of police and fire personnel, and providing and maintaining recreation facilities and services throughout the community such as Y-Lead, swimming pool, and city parks, shall the ordinance be adopted increasing the City general sales tax by half cent, with guaranteed independent financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 347, "no_votes": 322, "total_votes": 669, "percent_yes": 51.868460000000006, "percent_no": 48.131539999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.116591", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.223119", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain public safety and community services including, but not limited to, maintaining an adequate number of police and fire personnel, and providing and maintaining recreation facilities and services throughout the community such as Y-Lead, swimming pool, and city parks, shall the ordinance be adopted increasing the City general sales tax by half cent, with guaranteed independent financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11551, "fingerprint": "2009|200900081|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900081|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a678f4af36a6ee98", "measure_id": "200900081", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall JESUS VELASQUEZ be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Alisal Union School District, Trustee Area 1?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 198, "no_votes": 85, "total_votes": 283, "percent_yes": 69.964665, "percent_no": 30.035335000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-08-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.234716", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.118025", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.224589", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall JESUS VELASQUEZ be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Alisal Union School District, Trustee Area 1?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6750, "fingerprint": "2009|200900024|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900024|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "91692bb53149749e", "measure_id": "200900024", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Gabriel Guerrero be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member; San Ardo Union Elementary School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52, "no_votes": 98, "total_votes": 150, "percent_yes": 34.666666, "percent_no": 65.33333400000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.117400", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.224005", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Gabriel Guerrero be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member; San Ardo Union Elementary School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6751, "fingerprint": "2009|200900025|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900025|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "818e65410fe41385", "measure_id": "200900025", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Irma Guerrero be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member; San Ardo Union Elementary School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52, "no_votes": 99, "total_votes": 151, "percent_yes": 34.437087, "percent_no": 65.56291300000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.117739", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.224303", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Irma Guerrero be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member; San Ardo Union Elementary School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6749, "fingerprint": "2009|200900023|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900023|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "054b2fa0bf15ac1a", "measure_id": "200900023", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Rocio Gonzalez-Hunt be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member; Chualar Union Elementary School District; Trustee Area 3?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92, "no_votes": 88, "total_votes": 180, "percent_yes": 51.111114, "percent_no": 48.888886, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.117122", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.223713", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Rocio Gonzalez-Hunt be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member; Chualar Union Elementary School District; Trustee Area 3?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6752, "fingerprint": "2009|200900122|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900122|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "329ee97fb8c6983c", "measure_id": "200900122", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on December 1, 2008, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Monterey County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as the \"Proposal to Incorporate the Town of Carmel Valley\" (LAFCO File No. 03-10) be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2592, "no_votes": 2867, "total_votes": 5459, "percent_yes": 47.481224, "percent_no": 52.518776, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.118309", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.224900", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on December 1, 2008, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Monterey County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as the \"Proposal to Incorporate the Town of Carmel Valley\" (LAFCO File No. 03-10) be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6753, "fingerprint": "2009|200900123|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900123|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "3c719e592cc10d12", "measure_id": "200900123", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the Town Council of the Town of Carmel Valley in future elections be elected by district rather than at-large?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2170, "no_votes": 2481, "total_votes": 4651, "percent_yes": 46.656632, "percent_no": 53.343368, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.118576", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.225212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the Town Council of the Town of Carmel Valley in future elections be elected by district rather than at-large?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6754, "fingerprint": "2009|200900124|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900124|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7b3d9b39bfa5fa27", "measure_id": "200900124", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Approve discontinuance and abandonment of, and authorization to sell, Flanders mansion property public parkland. Shall discontinuance and abandonment of the Flanders Mansion Property(APN 010-061-005) as public parkland, and authorization to sell the Flanders Mansion Property \"with Conservation Easements and Mitigation\" as passed on May 12,2009 by the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council by Resolutions No. 2009-30 through 2009-33, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 913, "no_votes": 552, "total_votes": 1465, "percent_yes": 62.320817, "percent_no": 37.679183, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.118858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.225526", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approve discontinuance and abandonment of, and authorization to sell, Flanders mansion property public parkland. Shall discontinuance and abandonment of the Flanders Mansion Property(APN 010-061-005) as public parkland, and authorization to sell the Flanders Mansion Property \"with Conservation Easements and Mitigation\" as passed on May 12,2009 by the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council by Resolutions No. 2009-30 through 2009-33, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6755, "fingerprint": "2009|200900125|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900125|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c26df5117c8e5301", "measure_id": "200900125", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Pacific Grove Library Funding Measure be approved to enact an ordinance to create a Special Parcel Tax and limit that revenue to the sole purpose of maintaining and improving services at the Pacific Grove Public Library?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2747, "no_votes": 1421, "total_votes": 4168, "percent_yes": 65.90691, "percent_no": 34.093090000000004, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.119265", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.225929", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Pacific Grove Library Funding Measure be approved to enact an ordinance to create a Special Parcel Tax and limit that revenue to the sole purpose of maintaining and improving services at the Pacific Grove Public Library?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6756, "fingerprint": "2009|200900126|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900126|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7ca71e7021a80968", "measure_id": "200900126", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect residents by increasing youth gang/violence prevention; after-school recreation/mentoring; expanding job training; hiring more police to patrol neighborhoods/schools; retaining firefighters/paramedics; establishing community policing; prostitution prevention; crime fighting technology; and protecting essential services, shall Salinas's transactions and use (otherwise known as sales) tax be increased one cent, requiring independent audits, citizens oversight, public expenditure reports, with all funds only for Salinas, not for Sacramento?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5625, "no_votes": 8692, "total_votes": 14317, "percent_yes": 39.288956000000006, "percent_no": 60.711043999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.119579", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.226314", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect residents by increasing youth gang/violence prevention; after-school recreation/mentoring; expanding job training; hiring more police to patrol neighborhoods/schools; retaining firefighters/paramedics; establishing community policing; prostitution prevention; crime fighting technology; and protecting essential services, shall Salinas's transactions and use (otherwise known as sales) tax be increased one cent, requiring independent audits, citizens oversight, public expenditure reports, with all funds only for Salinas, not for Sacramento?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6757, "fingerprint": "2009|200900074|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900074|ORANGE", "content_hash": "158313209f464b44", "measure_id": "200900074", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent deep cuts in local educational programs, including: maintaining college preparation classes,\r\nhigh school counselors, student health/safety/security services, adequate instructional supplies and classroom technology; keeping school libraries open; protecting small class sizes and music/art programs; and retaining qualified teachers; shall Rowland Unified School District levy an annual $120 tax per parcel, for 5 years only, with independent oversight, and exemption for seniors, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting Rowland Unified schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4, "no_votes": 24, "total_votes": 28, "percent_yes": 14.285715, "percent_no": 85.714285, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-30", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.119869", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.226795", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent deep cuts in local educational programs, including: maintaining college preparation classes,\r\nhigh school counselors, student health/safety/security services, adequate instructional supplies and classroom technology; keeping school libraries open; protecting small class sizes and music/art programs; and retaining qualified teachers; shall Rowland Unified School District levy an annual $120 tax per parcel, for 5 years only, with independent oversight, and exemption for seniors, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting Rowland Unified schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6758, "fingerprint": "2009|200900080|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900080|PLACER", "content_hash": "ef46f290d48f6fbf", "measure_id": "200900080", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To keep park and recreation facilities safe, clean and well maintained, shall Rocklin City Ordinance No. 949, reenacting the Park Maintenance and Development Act of 1998, be approved which would allow the City to continue to collect a $10.00 to $30.00 per year special tax to be used only for park maintenance and development?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11064, "no_votes": 2317, "total_votes": 13381, "percent_yes": 82.684404, "percent_no": 17.315596, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-08-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.120157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.227176", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep park and recreation facilities safe, clean and well maintained, shall Rocklin City Ordinance No. 949, reenacting the Park Maintenance and Development Act of 1998, be approved which would allow the City to continue to collect a $10.00 to $30.00 per year special tax to be used only for park maintenance and development?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6759, "fingerprint": "2009|200900050|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900050|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1d780c82532caa9e", "measure_id": "200900050", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain a balanced budget, reduce debt and protect public safety services, including maintaining experienced police, 9-1-1 response, anti-gang/thug programs, natural disaster preparedness, and graffiti removal, shall the City of Desert Hot Springs modernize/increase the existing utility users tax rate by 2%, to sunset after 11 years, requiring independent annual audits and public expenditure reports, with all revenue staying in Desert Hot Springs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1506, "no_votes": 507, "total_votes": 2013, "percent_yes": 74.81371, "percent_no": 25.18629, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.120433", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.227468", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain a balanced budget, reduce debt and protect public safety services, including maintaining experienced police, 9-1-1 response, anti-gang/thug programs, natural disaster preparedness, and graffiti removal, shall the City of Desert Hot Springs modernize/increase the existing utility users tax rate by 2%, to sunset after 11 years, requiring independent annual audits and public expenditure reports, with all revenue staying in Desert Hot Springs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6763, "fingerprint": "2009|200900130|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900130|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "439acc2be763cea3", "measure_id": "200900130", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax assessed by the City for persons occupying hotel/motel rooms in the City of Norco be increased from eight percent (8%) to eleven percent (11%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1487, "no_votes": 1240, "total_votes": 2727, "percent_yes": 54.528785, "percent_no": 45.471215, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.121605", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.228694", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax assessed by the City for persons occupying hotel/motel rooms in the City of Norco be increased from eight percent (8%) to eleven percent (11%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6765, "fingerprint": "2009|200900132|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900132|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "928f59d8819be676", "measure_id": "200900132", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the 2001-3 Community Facilities District\r\n(CFD) tax be eliminated; and in order to preserve the safety and character in all neighborhoods in the City of Perris\r\nthrough general City services which may include fire protection, paramedic services, law enforcement, gang\r\nsuppression, crime and drug intervention, local job creation and retention, and graffiti removal, shall a citywide parcel tax be established?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 803, "no_votes": 1070, "total_votes": 1873, "percent_yes": 42.872396, "percent_no": 57.127604, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.122140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.229299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the 2001-3 Community Facilities District\r\n(CFD) tax be eliminated; and in order to preserve the safety and character in all neighborhoods in the City of Perris\r\nthrough general City services which may include fire protection, paramedic services, law enforcement, gang\r\nsuppression, crime and drug intervention, local job creation and retention, and graffiti removal, shall a citywide parcel tax be established?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6766, "fingerprint": "2009|200900133|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900133|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "493dbdaf862dd357", "measure_id": "200900133", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Perris City Council make its top priority for use of parcel tax revenue fire protection, paramedic services, law enforcement, gang suppression, crime and drug intervention, local job creation and retention, and graffiti removal?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1084, "no_votes": 784, "total_votes": 1868, "percent_yes": 58.02998, "percent_no": 41.97002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.122551", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.229655", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Perris City Council make its top priority for use of parcel tax revenue fire protection, paramedic services, law enforcement, gang suppression, crime and drug intervention, local job creation and retention, and graffiti removal?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6767, "fingerprint": "2009|200900134|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900134|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "72a1224331fd408a", "measure_id": "200900134", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the position of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 842, "no_votes": 1031, "total_votes": 1873, "percent_yes": 44.95462, "percent_no": 55.04538, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.122824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.229998", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the position of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6764, "fingerprint": "2009|200900131|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900131|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c54ee830faa2c553", "measure_id": "200900131", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to: reduce the City's telephone users' tax from 5% to 4.5%; revise the method for calculating and collecting the telephone users' tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law; eliminate the emergency response fee and adopt an access line tax in an amount equal to the current emergency past collection of the telephone users' tax and emergency response fee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5713, "no_votes": 2426, "total_votes": 8139, "percent_yes": 70.19290000000001, "percent_no": 29.80709999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.121872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.228994", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to: reduce the City's telephone users' tax from 5% to 4.5%; revise the method for calculating and collecting the telephone users' tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law; eliminate the emergency response fee and adopt an access line tax in an amount equal to the current emergency past collection of the telephone users' tax and emergency response fee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6761, "fingerprint": "2009|200900128|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900128|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f8576fb8d37c8d30", "measure_id": "200900128", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to make up lost funding and to provide adequate funding for public safety, street and park maintenance, tourist promotion and other services/projects for the residents of the City of Blythe, shall the City's tax on transient occupancies (\"Hotel Bed Tax\" and \"TOT\"), collected by hotels from tourists, visitors to the City and all hotel guests, be increased by 3% from 10% to 13% of the daily room charge.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 871, "no_votes": 980, "total_votes": 1851, "percent_yes": 47.055647, "percent_no": 52.944353, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.121068", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.228087", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to make up lost funding and to provide adequate funding for public safety, street and park maintenance, tourist promotion and other services/projects for the residents of the City of Blythe, shall the City's tax on transient occupancies (\"Hotel Bed Tax\" and \"TOT\"), collected by hotels from tourists, visitors to the City and all hotel guests, be increased by 3% from 10% to 13% of the daily room charge.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6768, "fingerprint": "2009|200900135|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900135|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cf2b90e34b8dc0e1", "measure_id": "200900135", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 09-E01 be enacted, repealing Measure D which was enacted in 2008 and Ordinance No.31, and providing that members of the legislative body of the City of Wildomar shall be elected AT LARGE as set forth in the terms and conditions of approval of the incorporation of the City of Wildomar imposed by the Riverside County Local Formation Commission and approved by a vote of the people?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1397, "no_votes": 914, "total_votes": 2311, "percent_yes": 60.450023, "percent_no": 39.549977, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.123090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.230281", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 09-E01 be enacted, repealing Measure D which was enacted in 2008 and Ordinance No.31, and providing that members of the legislative body of the City of Wildomar shall be elected AT LARGE as set forth in the terms and conditions of approval of the incorporation of the City of Wildomar imposed by the Riverside County Local Formation Commission and approved by a vote of the people?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6769, "fingerprint": "2009|200900136|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900136|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e8c9e0a0f9c36eb3", "measure_id": "200900136", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 09-E02 be enacted affirming the enactment of Measure D and Ordinance No. 31 providing that members of the legislative body of the City of Wildomar shall be elected BY districts as set forth in Ordinance No. 09-E02?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 466, "no_votes": 1802, "total_votes": 2268, "percent_yes": 20.546737, "percent_no": 79.45326299999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.123355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.230557", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 09-E02 be enacted affirming the enactment of Measure D and Ordinance No. 31 providing that members of the legislative body of the City of Wildomar shall be elected BY districts as set forth in Ordinance No. 09-E02?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6770, "fingerprint": "2009|200900137|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900137|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2d781f2ce9ff7fed", "measure_id": "200900137", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 09-E03 be enacted, repealing Measure D which was enacted in 2008 and Ordinance No 31, and providing that members of the legislative body of the City of Wildomar shall be elected FROM districts are set forth in Ordinance 09-E03?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 366, "no_votes": 1896, "total_votes": 2262, "percent_yes": 16.180370999999997, "percent_no": 83.819629, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.123623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.230838", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 09-E03 be enacted, repealing Measure D which was enacted in 2008 and Ordinance No 31, and providing that members of the legislative body of the City of Wildomar shall be elected FROM districts are set forth in Ordinance 09-E03?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6760, "fingerprint": "2009|200900127|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900127|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8d7daadeaf369643", "measure_id": "200900127", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To minimize future cuts and provide funding for essential city services including police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response, graffiti removal, and maintaining streets and public areas, shall the City of Banning adopt an ordinance increasing its existing Transient Occupancy Tax (which is a hotel bed tax paid when overnight visitors rent a room) from 6% to 12%, with annual independent audits provided by code, and all funds used to maintain city services in Banning?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3337, "no_votes": 1104, "total_votes": 4441, "percent_yes": 75.14073, "percent_no": 24.859269999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.120703", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.227777", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To minimize future cuts and provide funding for essential city services including police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response, graffiti removal, and maintaining streets and public areas, shall the City of Banning adopt an ordinance increasing its existing Transient Occupancy Tax (which is a hotel bed tax paid when overnight visitors rent a room) from 6% to 12%, with annual independent audits provided by code, and all funds used to maintain city services in Banning?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6762, "fingerprint": "2009|200900129|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900129|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8040a748cd31a7ec", "measure_id": "200900129", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve/maintain essential Coachella services such as police officers, firefighters; 911 response times; crime, gang and drug prevention programs; fixing potholes and streets; removing graffiti; sweeping streets; maintaining parks, soccer and sports fields; funding youth and senior services, shall Coachella establish a 5% utility users tax, exempting low-income seniors, with independent citizens oversight and annual financial audits, with all funds solely for Coachella?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 457, "no_votes": 551, "total_votes": 1008, "percent_yes": 45.337301, "percent_no": 54.662699, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.121337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.228380", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve/maintain essential Coachella services such as police officers, firefighters; 911 response times; crime, gang and drug prevention programs; fixing potholes and streets; removing graffiti; sweeping streets; maintaining parks, soccer and sports fields; funding youth and senior services, shall Coachella establish a 5% utility users tax, exempting low-income seniors, with independent citizens oversight and annual financial audits, with all funds solely for Coachella?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6771, "fingerprint": "2009|200900045|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900045|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "c1d0e984b2334607", "measure_id": "200900045", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Sections 91 through 95 of the Sacramento County Charter be amended to extend binding arbitration to resolve labor disputes with the County of Sacramento to include County employees represented by the Probation Non-Supervisory Unit and the Law Enforcement Management Unit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 101421, "no_votes": 87435, "total_votes": 188856, "percent_yes": 53.70282, "percent_no": 46.29718, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.123889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.231129", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 91 through 95 of the Sacramento County Charter be amended to extend binding arbitration to resolve labor disputes with the County of Sacramento to include County employees represented by the Probation Non-Supervisory Unit and the Law Enforcement Management Unit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6772, "fingerprint": "2009|200900051|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900051|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "af959e4ba5a73862", "measure_id": "200900051", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to provide funding for police services, maintenance of and improvements to city streets, sidewalks, and landscaping, graffiti removal, and code enforcement, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the City of Rancho Cordova's existing 2.5% utility users' tax on telecommunication and video services, and to modernize the ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4591, "no_votes": 3539, "total_votes": 8130, "percent_yes": 56.469864, "percent_no": 43.530136, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.124215", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.231406", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide funding for police services, maintenance of and improvements to city streets, sidewalks, and landscaping, graffiti removal, and code enforcement, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the City of Rancho Cordova's existing 2.5% utility users' tax on telecommunication and video services, and to modernize the ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6773, "fingerprint": "2009|200900085|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900085|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "8327533bd18dee45", "measure_id": "200900085", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an appropriations limit, as defined by Subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, be established for the Helendale Community Services District, County of San Bernadino, State  of California, in the amount of $293,525,.00?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 552, "no_votes": 130, "total_votes": 682, "percent_yes": 80.938417, "percent_no": 19.061583, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established an appropriations limit of $293,525 for the Helendal...", "summary_text": "This measure established an appropriations limit of $293,525 for the Helendale Community Services District in San Bernardino County, as required by the California Constitution. The limit caps the amount of tax revenues the district can spend annually.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.555244", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6775, "fingerprint": "2009|200900193|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900193|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7ede79d7b36ef0b3", "measure_id": "200900193", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Jerome M. Kern be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9315, "no_votes": 15785, "total_votes": 25100, "percent_yes": 37.111554000000005, "percent_no": 62.888445999999995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-12-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.142164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.232244", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jerome M. Kern be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6774, "fingerprint": "2009|200900034|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900034|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "2e6115b53df06490", "measure_id": "200900034", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent further cuts and preserve general city services, including public safety staffing for emergency response, reducing crime and criminal gang/drug activity, maintaining city streets/parks, and preserving library services and youth/after-school programs; shall the City of Chula Vista adopt an ordinance enacting a one cent transactions and use (sales) tax, expiring in ten years, with mandatory audits, quarterly reports to Mayor and City Council, and a citizens' review committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9645, "no_votes": 20030, "total_votes": 29675, "percent_yes": 32.502106, "percent_no": 67.497894, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.141816", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.231961", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent further cuts and preserve general city services, including public safety staffing for emergency response, reducing crime and criminal gang/drug activity, maintaining city streets/parks, and preserving library services and youth/after-school programs; shall the City of Chula Vista adopt an ordinance enacting a one cent transactions and use (sales) tax, expiring in ten years, with mandatory audits, quarterly reports to Mayor and City Council, and a citizens' review committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6776, "fingerprint": "2009|200900086|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900086|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3c2f68c787a6cf0e", "measure_id": "200900086", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City: establish a two-year budget cycle; be required to adopt a five-year financial plan; be required to adopt long-range financial policies and require that the budget comply with these policies; permit the Controller to certify the availability of funds for a contract if the Controller determines funds will be available when due; change deadlines for submitting and adopting labor agreements; and allow the Board to decide how to publish required public notices?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68270, "no_votes": 29414, "total_votes": 97684, "percent_yes": 69.88862, "percent_no": 30.111379999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.142469", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.232550", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City: establish a two-year budget cycle; be required to adopt a five-year financial plan; be required to adopt long-range financial policies and require that the budget comply with these policies; permit the Controller to certify the availability of funds for a contract if the Controller determines funds will be available when due; change deadlines for submitting and adopting labor agreements; and allow the Board to decide how to publish required public notices?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6777, "fingerprint": "2009|200900087|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900087|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1db53032f6c2c46f", "measure_id": "200900087", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City eliminate from its Charter the requirement that each member of the Board of Supervisors have two aides?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51835, "no_votes": 47361, "total_votes": 99196, "percent_yes": 52.25513000000001, "percent_no": 47.74486999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.142780", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.232862", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City eliminate from its Charter the requirement that each member of the Board of Supervisors have two aides?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6778, "fingerprint": "2009|200900088|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900088|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "35f2fa9ce6296a16", "measure_id": "200900088", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City be permitted to enter into a new naming rights contract for Candlestick Park, and shall it be City policy that fifty percent of any City revenue from the sale of those naming rights be used to fund directors of City recreation centers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58192, "no_votes": 40973, "total_votes": 99165, "percent_yes": 58.681995, "percent_no": 41.318005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.143079", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.233189", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City be permitted to enter into a new naming rights contract for Candlestick Park, and shall it be City policy that fifty percent of any City revenue from the sale of those naming rights be used to fund directors of City recreation centers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6779, "fingerprint": "2009|200900089|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900089|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1ab12bb6db0800bd", "measure_id": "200900089", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create a Mid-Market Special Sign District where new general advertising signs would be permitted, subject to certain restrictions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46008, "no_votes": 53999, "total_votes": 100007, "percent_yes": 46.00478, "percent_no": 53.99522, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.143442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.233531", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create a Mid-Market Special Sign District where new general advertising signs would be permitted, subject to certain restrictions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6780, "fingerprint": "2009|200900090|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900090|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "63c3685a386ed16f", "measure_id": "200900090", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City prohibit an increase in the number of general advertising signs on street furniture and specifically prohibit new general advertising signs on City-owned buildings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56802, "no_votes": 42365, "total_votes": 99167, "percent_yes": 57.279134, "percent_no": 42.720866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.143731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.233842", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City prohibit an increase in the number of general advertising signs on street furniture and specifically prohibit new general advertising signs on City-owned buildings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6781, "fingerprint": "2009|200900019|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900019|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "d2198ef474a14051", "measure_id": "200900019", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1812 entitled, \"An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lodi Approving and Adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Community Improvement Project,\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3969, "no_votes": 4679, "total_votes": 8648, "percent_yes": 45.895004, "percent_no": 54.104996, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.144020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.234143", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1812 entitled, \"An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lodi Approving and Adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Community Improvement Project,\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6782, "fingerprint": "2009|200900038|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900038|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "646a6e06bd2ce45b", "measure_id": "200900038", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the New Hope Elementary School District decrease the size of the Governing Board from five members to three members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 93, "no_votes": 45, "total_votes": 138, "percent_yes": 67.391306, "percent_no": 32.608694, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.144307", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.234452", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the New Hope Elementary School District decrease the size of the Governing Board from five members to three members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6783, "fingerprint": "2009|200900138|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900138|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "28d4cca55c2fd950", "measure_id": "200900138", "measure_letter": "A-09", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council's approval of Ordinance No. 953 N.S., increasing monthly water user rates effective January 1, 2010, where the rate for water users shall be a combination of a fixed rate plus a variable rate based on consumption, and where the variable rate component shall be further adjusted every January 1, up to, and including, January 1, 2014, be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2659, "no_votes": 3168, "total_votes": 5827, "percent_yes": 45.6324, "percent_no": 54.3676, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.144593", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.234782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council's approval of Ordinance No. 953 N.S., increasing monthly water user rates effective January 1, 2010, where the rate for water users shall be a combination of a fixed rate plus a variable rate based on consumption, and where the variable rate component shall be further adjusted every January 1, up to, and including, January 1, 2014, be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6785, "fingerprint": "2009|200900039|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900039|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "3daf04264fb9be93", "measure_id": "200900039", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve quality education and protect neighborhood elementary schools from state budget cuts by attracting/retaining qualified teachers/staff, maintaining writing, math, science, art/music programs, improving instruction with computer technology, and keeping class sizes small, shall Jefferson Elementary School District authorize an $85 annual education parcel tax for seven years, exempting senior citizens, with citizens' oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying in local schools to enhance achievement?\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4129, "no_votes": 2997, "total_votes": 7126, "percent_yes": 57.94274, "percent_no": 42.05726, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.145241", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.235420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve quality education and protect neighborhood elementary schools from state budget cuts by attracting/retaining qualified teachers/staff, maintaining writing, math, science, art/music programs, improving instruction with computer technology, and keeping class sizes small, shall Jefferson Elementary School District authorize an $85 annual education parcel tax for seven years, exempting senior citizens, with citizens' oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying in local schools to enhance achievement?\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6786, "fingerprint": "2009|200900040|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900040|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0cea5650770def06", "measure_id": "200900040", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect San Carlos' excellent elementary and middle schools; maintain high-quality programs including hands-on science, literacy programs to ensure all students read at or above grade level; attract, retain, and avoid laying off highly qualified teachers; and maintain art and music; shall the San Carlos School District impose a $78 per parcel school tax per year for six years, with independent citizen oversight, an exemption for those 65 and older, and all funds supporting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6102, "no_votes": 2412, "total_votes": 8514, "percent_yes": 71.67019, "percent_no": 28.329809999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.145530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.235945", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect San Carlos' excellent elementary and middle schools; maintain high-quality programs including hands-on science, literacy programs to ensure all students read at or above grade level; attract, retain, and avoid laying off highly qualified teachers; and maintain art and music; shall the San Carlos School District impose a $78 per parcel school tax per year for six years, with independent citizen oversight, an exemption for those 65 and older, and all funds supporting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6787, "fingerprint": "2009|200900041|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900041|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c8c340e4f33896a0", "measure_id": "200900041", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and enhance academic excellence at Woodside School through emphasis on quality instruction, especially in math, science, reading and writing, attracting and retaining outstanding teachers, and maintaining small class sizes, shall Woodside Elementary School District continue its annual school tax of $242 per parcel for eight years, adjusted by changes in the Consumer Price Index, not to exceed 4 percent annually, to increase the District's appropriations limit accordingly, with exemption for those 65 years and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 859, "no_votes": 275, "total_votes": 1134, "percent_yes": 75.74956, "percent_no": 24.250439999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.145817", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.236237", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and enhance academic excellence at Woodside School through emphasis on quality instruction, especially in math, science, reading and writing, attracting and retaining outstanding teachers, and maintaining small class sizes, shall Woodside Elementary School District continue its annual school tax of $242 per parcel for eight years, adjusted by changes in the Consumer Price Index, not to exceed 4 percent annually, to increase the District's appropriations limit accordingly, with exemption for those 65 years and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6788, "fingerprint": "2009|200900052|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900052|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "59c92d03ff1054c2", "measure_id": "200900052", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve public safety; prevent cuts to essential City services, including police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response, street and pothole repair, and youth recreation programs; improve traffic flow and safety; protect local coastal areas and beaches from polluted runoff and trash; and provide other general fund services, shall Pacifica adopt a one-cent sales tax expiring in 2016, subject to financial audits, public expenditure reports, and a Citizen's Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3319, "no_votes": 5252, "total_votes": 8571, "percent_yes": 38.723603, "percent_no": 61.276397, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.146101", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.236472", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve public safety; prevent cuts to essential City services, including police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response, street and pothole repair, and youth recreation programs; improve traffic flow and safety; protect local coastal areas and beaches from polluted runoff and trash; and provide other general fund services, shall Pacifica adopt a one-cent sales tax expiring in 2016, subject to financial audits, public expenditure reports, and a Citizen's Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6789, "fingerprint": "2009|200900068|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900068|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c34e1f3d68538922", "measure_id": "200900068", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect the quality of education in Redwood City elementary and middle schools; retain qualified teachers; maintain classroom science and technology programs; keep school libraries open; preserve art, music, physical education classes, and continue reading/math tutoring; shall Redwood City School District levy an annual tax of $91 per parcel, for 5 years only, with independent oversight, an exemption available for seniors, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit neighborhood K-8 schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7300, "no_votes": 4181, "total_votes": 11481, "percent_yes": 63.583314, "percent_no": 36.416686, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-06-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.146488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.236720", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect the quality of education in Redwood City elementary and middle schools; retain qualified teachers; maintain classroom science and technology programs; keep school libraries open; preserve art, music, physical education classes, and continue reading/math tutoring; shall Redwood City School District levy an annual tax of $91 per parcel, for 5 years only, with independent oversight, an exemption available for seniors, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit neighborhood K-8 schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6803, "fingerprint": "2009|200900152|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900152|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "953602daedb07416", "measure_id": "200900152", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve funding for general city services, shall the City of San Bruno approve an ordinance amending the San Bruno Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from ten (10%) to twelve (12%) per cent on the rate charged to hotel guests within the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3093, "no_votes": 1336, "total_votes": 4429, "percent_yes": 69.83518, "percent_no": 30.164820000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.150788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.240019", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve funding for general city services, shall the City of San Bruno approve an ordinance amending the San Bruno Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from ten (10%) to twelve (12%) per cent on the rate charged to hotel guests within the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6792, "fingerprint": "2009|200900141|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900141|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "94c5cab2f9639911", "measure_id": "200900141", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing transient occupancy tax on the rent charged for use of hotel rooms in the city be increased from 10% to 12%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 536, "no_votes": 292, "total_votes": 828, "percent_yes": 64.7343, "percent_no": 35.265699999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.147388", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.237395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing transient occupancy tax on the rent charged for use of hotel rooms in the city be increased from 10% to 12%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6793, "fingerprint": "2009|200900142|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900142|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d3531158c1d2e139", "measure_id": "200900142", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve funding for general city services, including maintaining public safety, recreation, planning and library services, and repairing and improving city streets and infrastructure, such as the Broadway/Highway 101 interchange, shall the City of Burlingame approve an ordinance amending the Burlingame Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from ten (10%) per cent to twelve (12%) per cent on the rent charged to hotel guests within the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3977, "no_votes": 1002, "total_votes": 4979, "percent_yes": 79.875475, "percent_no": 20.124525000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.147674", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.237629", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve funding for general city services, including maintaining public safety, recreation, planning and library services, and repairing and improving city streets and infrastructure, such as the Broadway/Highway 101 interchange, shall the City of Burlingame approve an ordinance amending the Burlingame Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from ten (10%) per cent to twelve (12%) per cent on the rent charged to hotel guests within the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6794, "fingerprint": "2009|200900143|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900143|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b93f1fd1f15e013e", "measure_id": "200900143", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Burlingame be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2570, "no_votes": 2214, "total_votes": 4784, "percent_yes": 53.720737, "percent_no": 46.279263, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.147959", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.237866", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Burlingame be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6796, "fingerprint": "2009|200900145|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900145|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d0ad3292c4cccd11", "measure_id": "200900145", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance adopted by the City Council increasing the uniform transient occupancy tax from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2295, "no_votes": 1056, "total_votes": 3351, "percent_yes": 68.48702, "percent_no": 31.51298, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.148608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.238334", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance adopted by the City Council increasing the uniform transient occupancy tax from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6797, "fingerprint": "2009|200900146|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900146|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "200900146", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1693, "no_votes": 1626, "total_votes": 3319, "percent_yes": 51.00934, "percent_no": 48.99066, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.148891", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.238572", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6806, "fingerprint": "2009|200900155|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900155|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "49bfa201276f2041", "measure_id": "200900155", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and protect City services and facilities, such as street and sidewalk maintenance and repair, fire protection and emergency medical services, police protection, neighborhood watch and crime prevention programs, libraries, community centers, recreation programs, and parks, shall the City of San Mateo be authorized to enact a one-quarter cent tax on sales for eight years with all proceeds placed in the City's General Fund with independent annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8258, "no_votes": 5227, "total_votes": 13485, "percent_yes": 61.238414, "percent_no": 38.761586, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.151768", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.240890", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and protect City services and facilities, such as street and sidewalk maintenance and repair, fire protection and emergency medical services, police protection, neighborhood watch and crime prevention programs, libraries, community centers, recreation programs, and parks, shall the City of San Mateo be authorized to enact a one-quarter cent tax on sales for eight years with all proceeds placed in the City's General Fund with independent annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6807, "fingerprint": "2009|200900156|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900156|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "37bef6c3d6cd569c", "measure_id": "200900156", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and protect City services and facilities, such as street and sidewalk maintenance and repair, fire protection and emergency medical services, police protection, neighborhood watch and crime prevention programs, libraries, community centers, recreation programs, and parks, shall the City of San Mateo be authorized to increase the Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax (the \"hotel tax\") by 2% with all proceeds placed in the City's General Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10068, "no_votes": 3424, "total_votes": 13492, "percent_yes": 74.622, "percent_no": 25.378, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.152055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.241214", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and protect City services and facilities, such as street and sidewalk maintenance and repair, fire protection and emergency medical services, police protection, neighborhood watch and crime prevention programs, libraries, community centers, recreation programs, and parks, shall the City of San Mateo be authorized to increase the Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax (the \"hotel tax\") by 2% with all proceeds placed in the City's General Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6808, "fingerprint": "2009|200900157|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900157|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b3045aa9cf3a5af8", "measure_id": "200900157", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for essential public services in South San Francisco, including parks, recreation, police, fire, streets, and libraries, shall the existing transient occupancy tax (\"hotel\") tax, paid by hotel guests and collected by hotel operators, be increased by 1% and modernized by amending the administrative provisions of the tax to ensure full collection for online reservations and to apply the tax to separate charges for vehicle parking for hotels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4326, "no_votes": 1246, "total_votes": 5572, "percent_yes": 77.63819, "percent_no": 22.361810000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.152340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.241511", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for essential public services in South San Francisco, including parks, recreation, police, fire, streets, and libraries, shall the existing transient occupancy tax (\"hotel\") tax, paid by hotel guests and collected by hotel operators, be increased by 1% and modernized by amending the administrative provisions of the tax to ensure full collection for online reservations and to apply the tax to separate charges for vehicle parking for hotels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6798, "fingerprint": "2009|200900147|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900147|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c015a690730a75f3", "measure_id": "200900147", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do the people of the Town of Portola Valley adopt an ordinance that continues the reduced four and one-half percent (4.5%) Utility Users Tax levied on telephone, gas, water, and electricity, set forth in Chapter 3.32 of the Portola Valley Municipal Code, for a period of four (4) years from July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2014?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1229, "no_votes": 259, "total_votes": 1488, "percent_yes": 82.59408499999999, "percent_no": 17.405915000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.149172", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.238805", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do the people of the Town of Portola Valley adopt an ordinance that continues the reduced four and one-half percent (4.5%) Utility Users Tax levied on telephone, gas, water, and electricity, set forth in Chapter 3.32 of the Portola Valley Municipal Code, for a period of four (4) years from July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2014?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6799, "fingerprint": "2009|200900148|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900148|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d19acfe59b262274", "measure_id": "200900148", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Portola Valley adjust the appropriations limit of the Town each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2010 by the amount of money collected from the Utility Users Tax during the time of its levy and collection, provided that authorization to adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed four (4) years from the end of Fiscal Year 2009-2010?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 891, "no_votes": 598, "total_votes": 1489, "percent_yes": 59.838820000000005, "percent_no": 40.161179999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.149464", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.239039", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Portola Valley adjust the appropriations limit of the Town each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2010 by the amount of money collected from the Utility Users Tax during the time of its levy and collection, provided that authorization to adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed four (4) years from the end of Fiscal Year 2009-2010?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6800, "fingerprint": "2009|200900149|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900149|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0690b4e66d1984b7", "measure_id": "200900149", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Only if the Town of Portola Valley Proposition Q adjusting the Town's Appropriation Limit passes shall the Town additionally adjust the appropriations limit each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2010 by the amount of money collected from imposition of the 2% Utility Users Tax (for open space purposes only) during the time of its levy and collection, provided authorization to adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed four years from the end of Fiscal Year 2009-2010?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 967, "no_votes": 500, "total_votes": 1467, "percent_yes": 65.916836, "percent_no": 34.083164, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.149749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.239266", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Only if the Town of Portola Valley Proposition Q adjusting the Town's Appropriation Limit passes shall the Town additionally adjust the appropriations limit each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2010 by the amount of money collected from imposition of the 2% Utility Users Tax (for open space purposes only) during the time of its levy and collection, provided authorization to adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed four years from the end of Fiscal Year 2009-2010?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6790, "fingerprint": "2009|200900139|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900139|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "90cb7fc94cbef278", "measure_id": "200900139", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue providing funding to maintain neighborhood police patrols and the Town's ability to respond to emergencies, repair and maintain streets, and repair and construct storm drains, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the existing Town of Atherton Special Parcel Tax for four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1426, "no_votes": 403, "total_votes": 1829, "percent_yes": 77.96610000000001, "percent_no": 22.03389999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.146817", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.236937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue providing funding to maintain neighborhood police patrols and the Town's ability to respond to emergencies, repair and maintain streets, and repair and construct storm drains, shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the existing Town of Atherton Special Parcel Tax for four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6784, "fingerprint": "2009|200900035|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900035|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8e61dbd0779e0716", "measure_id": "200900035", "measure_letter": "SD", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve, upgrade and maintain the deteriorated storm drain system, protect water quality, further reduce pollutants flowing into our creeks and San Francisco Bay, prevent street flooding that impedes residents and, police/fire, emergency access, improve local drainage, shall the City of Burlingame enact a storm drainage fee at the rate of 4.192 cents per impervious square foot, adjusted for inflation not exceeding 2% annually, with independent audits, citizen's oversight, and requiring all funds expended only on storm drains?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2706, "no_votes": 1561, "total_votes": 4267, "percent_yes": 63.41692, "percent_no": 36.58308, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.144920", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.235105", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve, upgrade and maintain the deteriorated storm drain system, protect water quality, further reduce pollutants flowing into our creeks and San Francisco Bay, prevent street flooding that impedes residents and, police/fire, emergency access, improve local drainage, shall the City of Burlingame enact a storm drainage fee at the rate of 4.192 cents per impervious square foot, adjusted for inflation not exceeding 2% annually, with independent audits, citizen's oversight, and requiring all funds expended only on storm drains?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6791, "fingerprint": "2009|200900140|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900140|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ad4c7f9c0a42f906", "measure_id": "200900140", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In accordance with past practice, shall the Town's appropriations limit be increased by one and a half times the amount of the any voter approved parcel tax for four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1252, "no_votes": 547, "total_votes": 1799, "percent_yes": 69.594216, "percent_no": 30.405783999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.147103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.237156", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In accordance with past practice, shall the Town's appropriations limit be increased by one and a half times the amount of the any voter approved parcel tax for four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6804, "fingerprint": "2009|200900153|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900153|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6d1f4e0270a04113", "measure_id": "200900153", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "City of San Carlos Vital Services Measure: To prevent further cuts and preserve funding for general city services, including fire protection, paramedic and 9-1-1- emergency response, police protection, and crime prevention; street repair and maintenance; and avoiding closure of parks and sports fields, shall the City of San Carlos adopt an ordinance enacting a one-half cent transactions and use tax (sales tax) for six years with independent annual audits and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3022, "no_votes": 3967, "total_votes": 6989, "percent_yes": 43.239376, "percent_no": 56.760624, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.151108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.240260", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of San Carlos Vital Services Measure: To prevent further cuts and preserve funding for general city services, including fire protection, paramedic and 9-1-1- emergency response, police protection, and crime prevention; street repair and maintenance; and avoiding closure of parks and sports fields, shall the City of San Carlos adopt an ordinance enacting a one-half cent transactions and use tax (sales tax) for six years with independent annual audits and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6805, "fingerprint": "2009|200900154|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900154|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200900154", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3972, "no_votes": 2490, "total_votes": 6462, "percent_yes": 61.46704, "percent_no": 38.53296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.151429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.240585", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6795, "fingerprint": "2009|200900144|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900144|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "93774af7b07b4d88", "measure_id": "200900144", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance of the People increasing the number of terms a Member of the City Council may serve from two full terms (8 years) in succession to three full terms (12 years) in succession be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1406, "no_votes": 2692, "total_votes": 4098, "percent_yes": 34.30942, "percent_no": 65.69058, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.148292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.238100", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance of the People increasing the number of terms a Member of the City Council may serve from two full terms (8 years) in succession to three full terms (12 years) in succession be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6801, "fingerprint": "2009|200900150|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900150|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "18b290ccbb50e988", "measure_id": "200900150", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 18(a) of the City Charter be amended to create a seven member Library Board, all to be appointed by the City Council; Section 18(f) be added to provide that the Library Board would establish rules for its proceedings and the City Council would set forth the authority and duties of the Library Board; and deleting Section 19, 19 1/2, and 20 in their entirety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4353, "no_votes": 2966, "total_votes": 7319, "percent_yes": 59.47534, "percent_no": 40.52466, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.150065", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.239508", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 18(a) of the City Charter be amended to create a seven member Library Board, all to be appointed by the City Council; Section 18(f) be added to provide that the Library Board would establish rules for its proceedings and the City Council would set forth the authority and duties of the Library Board; and deleting Section 19, 19 1/2, and 20 in their entirety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6802, "fingerprint": "2009|200900151|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900151|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "52719d2b0d14d8f3", "measure_id": "200900151", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2346 be adopted to increase the rates of Redwood City's Business License Tax by 16.67% per year (rounded to the nearest whole dollar amount) for each of the three successive fiscal years commencing on July 1, 2010 and then, commencing on July 1, 2013 and annually thereafter, be increased based upon the annual change in the Consumer Price Index?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3415, "no_votes": 4049, "total_votes": 7464, "percent_yes": 45.75295, "percent_no": 54.24705, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.150499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.239778", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2346 be adopted to increase the rates of Redwood City's Business License Tax by 16.67% per year (rounded to the nearest whole dollar amount) for each of the three successive fiscal years commencing on July 1, 2010 and then, commencing on July 1, 2013 and annually thereafter, be increased based upon the annual change in the Consumer Price Index?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6809, "fingerprint": "2009|200900033|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900033|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "ce0a5a56a654a51b", "measure_id": "200900033", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the action be taken by the Santa Barbara Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the formation of a Community Services District in the territory known as the Santa Rita Hills be approved subject to the terms and conditions set forth in such resolution including authorization of an annual special tax not to exceed $3,000,000 for FY 2008-2009 with the minimum tax to be determined annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 14, "percent_yes": 85.714287, "percent_no": 14.285713000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.152628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.241816", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the action be taken by the Santa Barbara Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the formation of a Community Services District in the territory known as the Santa Rita Hills be approved subject to the terms and conditions set forth in such resolution including authorization of an annual special tax not to exceed $3,000,000 for FY 2008-2009 with the minimum tax to be determined annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6810, "fingerprint": "2009|200900158|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900158|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "0d96779cb383de9b", "measure_id": "200900158", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be revised by amending Charter Section 1506 to reduce the maximum allowed building height within the City to forty-five (45) feet generally and forty (40) feet within the El Pueblo Viejo district except for those areas of the City zoned for single-family and two-family homes where the maximum building height will remain at thirty (30) feet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10444, "no_votes": 12237, "total_votes": 22681, "percent_yes": 46.047354, "percent_no": 53.952646, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.152947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.242078", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be revised by amending Charter Section 1506 to reduce the maximum allowed building height within the City to forty-five (45) feet generally and forty (40) feet within the El Pueblo Viejo district except for those areas of the City zoned for single-family and two-family homes where the maximum building height will remain at thirty (30) feet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6811, "fingerprint": "2009|200900159|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900159|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "b00f65b835b26d53", "measure_id": "200900159", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be revised by amending Charter Section 809 and Charter Section 810 to combine the Board of Park Commissioners with the Recreation Commission to form a new commission called the \"Parks and Recreation Commission\" and to allow the City Council to appoint a youth member of the new Parks and Recreation Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16969, "no_votes": 4633, "total_votes": 21602, "percent_yes": 78.552914, "percent_no": 21.447086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.153258", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.242262", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be revised by amending Charter Section 809 and Charter Section 810 to combine the Board of Park Commissioners with the Recreation Commission to form a new commission called the \"Parks and Recreation Commission\" and to allow the City Council to appoint a youth member of the new Parks and Recreation Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6812, "fingerprint": "2009|200900160|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900160|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d0712392fbee4f10", "measure_id": "200900160", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be revised by amending Charter Section 811 to increase the number of Harbor Commissioners from five (5) to seven (7) members and to allow one member of the Commission to be a registered voter within Santa Barbara County and not necessarily just within the City of Santa Barbara as currently required?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12101, "no_votes": 9104, "total_votes": 21205, "percent_yes": 57.06672699999999, "percent_no": 42.93327300000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.153542", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.242442", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be revised by amending Charter Section 811 to increase the number of Harbor Commissioners from five (5) to seven (7) members and to allow one member of the Commission to be a registered voter within Santa Barbara County and not necessarily just within the City of Santa Barbara as currently required?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6813, "fingerprint": "2009|200900161|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900161|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "8d0483e8fe53dc4d", "measure_id": "200900161", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be revised by amending Charter Section 814 to reduce the number of Members on the Architectural Board of Review (the \"ABR\") from nine (9) to seven (7) members and to allow the City Council to appoint up to three (3) ABR members from persons registered to vote within Santa Barbara County and not necessarily just within the City of Santa Barbara as currently required?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14026, "no_votes": 7321, "total_votes": 21347, "percent_yes": 65.70478, "percent_no": 34.29522, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.153825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.242622", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be revised by amending Charter Section 814 to reduce the number of Members on the Architectural Board of Review (the \"ABR\") from nine (9) to seven (7) members and to allow the City Council to appoint up to three (3) ABR members from persons registered to vote within Santa Barbara County and not necessarily just within the City of Santa Barbara as currently required?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6814, "fingerprint": "2009|200900020|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900020|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0bf83eee6d19ffaa", "measure_id": "200900020", "measure_letter": "7", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Madison Nguyen be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember, District 7, of the City of San Jose?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5897, "no_votes": 7270, "total_votes": 13167, "percent_yes": 44.78621, "percent_no": 55.21379, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.154107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.242807", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Madison Nguyen be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember, District 7, of the City of San Jose?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11554, "fingerprint": "2009|200900163|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900163|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "04f50685256d6d33", "measure_id": "200900163", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Palo Alto Municipal Code be amended to establish a business license tax in order to help maintain the City's ability to fund basic City services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6113, "no_votes": 8195, "total_votes": 14308, "percent_yes": 42.72435, "percent_no": 57.27565, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.252729", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.156381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.243711", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Palo Alto Municipal Code be amended to establish a business license tax in order to help maintain the City's ability to fund basic City services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11552, "fingerprint": "2009|200900053|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900053|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "310351746c65bff6", "measure_id": "200900053", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase opportunities for economic growth in the city while preserving the citywide population cap of 48,000 residents by 2020, shall an ordinance be adopted to exempt a total of 500 residential units in a 20 block area of downtown from the City of Morgan Hill's Residential Development Control System and to authorize the City Council to adopt policies and procedures implementing the exemptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4094, "no_votes": 2882, "total_votes": 6976, "percent_yes": 58.686924, "percent_no": 41.313076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.252199", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.155729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.243346", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase opportunities for economic growth in the city while preserving the citywide population cap of 48,000 residents by 2020, shall an ordinance be adopted to exempt a total of 500 residential units in a 20 block area of downtown from the City of Morgan Hill's Residential Development Control System and to authorize the City Council to adopt policies and procedures implementing the exemptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6816, "fingerprint": "2009|200900043|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900043|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "536e6e268f0e595d", "measure_id": "200900043", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education and protect neighborhood elementary and middle schools from state budget cuts by attracting and retaining qualified teachers; maintaining reading, math and science programs; keeping school libraries open; and keeping class sizes small, shall the Moreland School District authorize a $95 annual education parcel tax for eight years, with an exemption for senior citizens, citizens' oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrator salaries and all funds staying in Moreland schools to enhance student achievement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5415, "no_votes": 2425, "total_votes": 7840, "percent_yes": 69.06888, "percent_no": 30.931120000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.155285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.243166", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education and protect neighborhood elementary and middle schools from state budget cuts by attracting and retaining qualified teachers; maintaining reading, math and science programs; keeping school libraries open; and keeping class sizes small, shall the Moreland School District authorize a $95 annual education parcel tax for eight years, with an exemption for senior citizens, citizens' oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrator salaries and all funds staying in Moreland schools to enhance student achievement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11553, "fingerprint": "2009|200900162|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900162|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "063058c0b0d11cdf", "measure_id": "200900162", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing the tax rate, shall an ordinance be adopted to update Cupertino's existing telephone utility users tax, to fund general city services, including neighborhood police patrols, library services, city streets, parks and open spaces, senior programs, and school crossing guards, while maintaining senior citizens' tax exemptions, retaining local control of revenues, requiring annual audits and public expenditure reviews, by amending language for consistency with current practice?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7978, "no_votes": 2523, "total_votes": 10501, "percent_yes": 75.97372, "percent_no": 24.02628, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.252463", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.156075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.243527", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the tax rate, shall an ordinance be adopted to update Cupertino's existing telephone utility users tax, to fund general city services, including neighborhood police patrols, library services, city streets, parks and open spaces, senior programs, and school crossing guards, while maintaining senior citizens' tax exemptions, retaining local control of revenues, requiring annual audits and public expenditure reviews, by amending language for consistency with current practice?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6815, "fingerprint": "2009|200900042|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900042|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b38db0bab53ebc60", "measure_id": "200900042", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support academic achievement for local students by retaining qualified and experienced teachers; training new teachers; maintaining safe, clean schools and high quality academic programs, including art/music, shall Cupertino Union School District authorize an annual $125 education parcel tax for six years with citizen oversight and annual reports, no funds for administrator salaries, exemption for senior citizens over age 65 and every dollar staying in local schools to support high quality education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18011, "no_votes": 7717, "total_votes": 25728, "percent_yes": 70.00544, "percent_no": 29.994560000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.154483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.242985", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support academic achievement for local students by retaining qualified and experienced teachers; training new teachers; maintaining safe, clean schools and high quality academic programs, including art/music, shall Cupertino Union School District authorize an annual $125 education parcel tax for six years with citizen oversight and annual reports, no funds for administrator salaries, exemption for senior citizens over age 65 and every dollar staying in local schools to support high quality education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6818, "fingerprint": "2009|200900188|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900188|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8cad48791240483e", "measure_id": "200900188", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain academic excellence in neighborhood schools, retain qualified, experienced teachers, prepare students for college and careers, maintain small class sizes in kindergarten through third grade and provide after-school tutoring and guidance programs, with no funds for administrator salaries, shall the Santa Clara Unified School District authorize an annual $138 education parcel tax for five years, with mandatory audits, citizen oversight, an exemption for citizens 65 years and older, and funding remaining locally controlled for neighborhood schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11043, "no_votes": 6498, "total_votes": 17541, "percent_yes": 62.955360000000006, "percent_no": 37.044639999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.157842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.244075", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain academic excellence in neighborhood schools, retain qualified, experienced teachers, prepare students for college and careers, maintain small class sizes in kindergarten through third grade and provide after-school tutoring and guidance programs, with no funds for administrator salaries, shall the Santa Clara Unified School District authorize an annual $138 education parcel tax for five years, with mandatory audits, citizen oversight, an exemption for citizens 65 years and older, and funding remaining locally controlled for neighborhood schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6817, "fingerprint": "2009|200900187|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900187|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4e97ee7261220daf", "measure_id": "200900187", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide stable, local funds needed to protect teaching positions, and assure that Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook, and Monte Vista High School students are prepared to successfully compete for college admission, shall the Fremont Union High School District replace its existing, expiring parcel tax with a tax at the same annual rate of $98 per parcel to be adjusted annually for inflation, with all funds benefitting local high schools, and offering an exemption to seniors and the disabled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19995, "no_votes": 13518, "total_votes": 33513, "percent_yes": 59.663415, "percent_no": 40.336585, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.157286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.243893", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide stable, local funds needed to protect teaching positions, and assure that Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook, and Monte Vista High School students are prepared to successfully compete for college admission, shall the Fremont Union High School District replace its existing, expiring parcel tax with a tax at the same annual rate of $98 per parcel to be adjusted annually for inflation, with all funds benefitting local high schools, and offering an exemption to seniors and the disabled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6819, "fingerprint": "2009|200900001|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900001|SHASTA", "content_hash": "a80fe09804e51a20", "measure_id": "200900001", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Lyle Turner be recalled from the office of Mt. Gate\r\nCommunity Service District Director?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 293, "no_votes": 127, "total_votes": 420, "percent_yes": 69.7619, "percent_no": 30.238100000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-02-24", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.158322", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.244254", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Lyle Turner be recalled from the office of Mt. Gate\r\nCommunity Service District Director?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6820, "fingerprint": "2009|200900164|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900164|SOLANO", "content_hash": "4a5d7c09bb1a773b", "measure_id": "200900164", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the tax rate and modernize the existing Utility Users\u2019 Tax only on telecommunication and video services, to preserve funding for essential City services including police, fire, emergency medical response, street repair and other\r\nCity services, treating all taxpayers equally regardless of\r\ntechnology used, with all revenue and expenditures subject to the City\u2019s annual independent audit and keeping locally generated revenues in Vallejo?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10065, "no_votes": 4472, "total_votes": 14537, "percent_yes": 69.23711999999999, "percent_no": 30.76288000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.158779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.244433", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the tax rate and modernize the existing Utility Users\u2019 Tax only on telecommunication and video services, to preserve funding for essential City services including police, fire, emergency medical response, street repair and other\r\nCity services, treating all taxpayers equally regardless of\r\ntechnology used, with all revenue and expenditures subject to the City\u2019s annual independent audit and keeping locally generated revenues in Vallejo?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6823, "fingerprint": "2009|200900192|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900192|SONOMA", "content_hash": "5ab51af8d1352c77", "measure_id": "200900192", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall GEORGE BARICH be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council of the City of Cotati?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1119, "no_votes": 571, "total_votes": 1690, "percent_yes": 66.21302, "percent_no": 33.78698, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.160746", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.245007", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall GEORGE BARICH be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council of the City of Cotati?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6821, "fingerprint": "2009|200900026|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900026|SONOMA", "content_hash": "66011cb776cd710e", "measure_id": "200900026", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to provide our students with courses in the arts and music, as well as technology instruction, all essential for student growth and development, shall the Gravenstein Union School District be authorized to levy a qualified special tax of $36 per year on each parcel of taxable real property in the District for no more than eight years, commencing July 1, 2009, after the expiration of the existing parcel tax, with annual audits and an exemption for seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1019, "no_votes": 629, "total_votes": 1648, "percent_yes": 61.832523, "percent_no": 38.167477, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.159392", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.244641", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to provide our students with courses in the arts and music, as well as technology instruction, all essential for student growth and development, shall the Gravenstein Union School District be authorized to levy a qualified special tax of $36 per year on each parcel of taxable real property in the District for no more than eight years, commencing July 1, 2009, after the expiration of the existing parcel tax, with annual audits and an exemption for seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6822, "fingerprint": "2009|200900189|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900189|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e898e74075642481", "measure_id": "200900189", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and provide a safe learning environment for our children by performing seismic upgrades, modernizing school facilities, replacing outdated portable classrooms and repaying outstanding debt incurred from past school construction projects, shall Shoreline Unified School District issue $9,290,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits with accountability provided by a citizens' oversight committee and independent audit of expenditure of funds, with no funds used for administrators' or teachers' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 282, "no_votes": 293, "total_votes": 575, "percent_yes": 49.04348, "percent_no": 50.95652, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.160342", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.244826", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and provide a safe learning environment for our children by performing seismic upgrades, modernizing school facilities, replacing outdated portable classrooms and repaying outstanding debt incurred from past school construction projects, shall Shoreline Unified School District issue $9,290,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits with accountability provided by a citizens' oversight committee and independent audit of expenditure of funds, with no funds used for administrators' or teachers' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6824, "fingerprint": "2009|200900165|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900165|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "c5dd1bdbbf76c92d", "measure_id": "200900165", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Modesto City Council provide sewer service, after annexation, to that area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan known as the \"Kiernan Avenue Corridor Comprehensive Planning Districts, including the Kiernan/Carver North Comprehensive Planning District, a portion of the Kiernan/Carver Comprehensive Planning District and a portion of the Salida Comprehensive Planning District\" (all areas combined consisting of approximately 1,310 gross acres)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8294, "no_votes": 12467, "total_votes": 20761, "percent_yes": 39.949906, "percent_no": 60.050094, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.161021", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.245195", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Modesto City Council provide sewer service, after annexation, to that area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan known as the \"Kiernan Avenue Corridor Comprehensive Planning Districts, including the Kiernan/Carver North Comprehensive Planning District, a portion of the Kiernan/Carver Comprehensive Planning District and a portion of the Salida Comprehensive Planning District\" (all areas combined consisting of approximately 1,310 gross acres)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6825, "fingerprint": "2009|200900166|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900166|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "4a8ad1da8a879ed8", "measure_id": "200900166", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Modesto City Counsel provide sewer service, after annexation, to that area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan known as the \"College West Comprehensive Planning District\" (consisting of approximately 230 gross acres)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7288, "no_votes": 13358, "total_votes": 20646, "percent_yes": 35.299817, "percent_no": 64.70018300000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.161293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.245378", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Modesto City Counsel provide sewer service, after annexation, to that area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan known as the \"College West Comprehensive Planning District\" (consisting of approximately 230 gross acres)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6826, "fingerprint": "2009|200900167|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900167|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "8fe1f33b3d0da539", "measure_id": "200900167", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Modesto City Council provide sewer service, after annexation, to that area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan known as the \"130-Acre Regional Commercial Portion of the Hetch-Hetchy Comprehensive Planning District\"(approximate gross acreage)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7883, "no_votes": 12680, "total_votes": 20563, "percent_yes": 38.335845, "percent_no": 61.664155, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.161593", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.245563", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Modesto City Council provide sewer service, after annexation, to that area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan known as the \"130-Acre Regional Commercial Portion of the Hetch-Hetchy Comprehensive Planning District\"(approximate gross acreage)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6827, "fingerprint": "2009|200900168|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900168|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "05e2a2808cd72ba7", "measure_id": "200900168", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Modesto City Council provide sewer service, after annexation, to that area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan known as the \"Northwest Portion of the Roselle/Claribel Comprehensive Planning District\" (consisting of approximately 480 gross acres?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7490, "no_votes": 13120, "total_votes": 20610, "percent_yes": 36.34158, "percent_no": 63.65842, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.161929", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.245747", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Modesto City Council provide sewer service, after annexation, to that area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan known as the \"Northwest Portion of the Roselle/Claribel Comprehensive Planning District\" (consisting of approximately 480 gross acres?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6828, "fingerprint": "2009|200900169|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900169|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "f278fd729878b41e", "measure_id": "200900169", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Modesto City COuncil provide sewer service, after annexation, to that area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan known as the \"830-acre Village Residential Portion of the Hetch-Hetchy Comprehensive Planning District\"(approximate gross acreage)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6213, "no_votes": 14349, "total_votes": 20562, "percent_yes": 30.21593, "percent_no": 69.78407, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.162198", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.245929", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Modesto City COuncil provide sewer service, after annexation, to that area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan known as the \"830-acre Village Residential Portion of the Hetch-Hetchy Comprehensive Planning District\"(approximate gross acreage)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1207, "fingerprint": "2009|CA1185|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|CA1185|Statewide", "content_hash": "50b90a80565482ac", "measure_id": "CA1185", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1F", "description": "Elected Officials' Salaries. Prevents Pay Increases During Budget Deficit Years.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.30000305, "percent_no": 25.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Labor & Employment | Legislatures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure prohibits elected officials from receiving salary increas...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure prohibits elected officials from receiving salary increases during years when California has a budget deficit. It passed in 2009 with 74.3% voter approval.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1F", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1F_(2009)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2009/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2009", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201F%202009", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201F%202009", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1206, "fingerprint": "2009|CA1184|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|CA1184|Statewide", "content_hash": "c7f55ec70c863c03", "measure_id": "CA1184", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1B", "description": "Education Funding. Payment Plan.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.09999847, "percent_no": 61.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required the state to make payments to school distric...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required the state to make payments to school districts to partially repay money borrowed from education funds during budget shortfalls, with payments spread over multiple years according to a specified schedule. The measure aimed to establish a formal repayment plan for education funding that had been temporarily redirected to address the state's fiscal crisis.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1B", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1B_(2009)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2009/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2009", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201B%202009", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201B%202009", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1205, "fingerprint": "2009|CA1183|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|CA1183|Statewide", "content_hash": "089826e87c667c98", "measure_id": "CA1183", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1C", "description": "Lottery Modernization Act.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.59999847, "percent_no": 64.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Gambling & Lotteries\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1C", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1C_(2009)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2009/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2009", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201C%202009", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201C%202009", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1204, "fingerprint": "2009|CA1182|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|CA1182|Statewide", "content_hash": "d046beab9bce2a52", "measure_id": "CA1182", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1A", "description": "Stabilizes State Budget. Changes California Budget Process. Limits State Spending. Increases \"Rainy Day\" Budget Stabilization Fund.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.59999847, "percent_no": 65.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed California's budget process by imposing limit...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed California's budget process by imposing limits on state spending and expanding the state's rainy day fund to help stabilize the budget during economic fluctuations.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1A", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1A_(2009)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2009/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2009", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201A%202009", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201A%202009", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1203, "fingerprint": "2009|CA1181|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|CA1181|Statewide", "content_hash": "101a6962773b660a", "measure_id": "CA1181", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1D", "description": "Protects Children's Services Funding. Helps Balance State Budget.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.0, "percent_no": 66.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have protected funding for children's services prog...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have protected funding for children's services programs while helping to balance California's state budget through fiscal restructuring mechanisms.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1D", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1D_(2009)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2009/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2009", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201D%202009", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201D%202009", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1202, "fingerprint": "2009|CA1180|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|CA1180|Statewide", "content_hash": "ef269f709fd40246", "measure_id": "CA1180", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1E", "description": "Mental Health Services Funding. Temporary Reallocation. Helps Balance State Budget.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 33.5, "percent_no": 66.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have temporarily reallocated funds from California's menta...", "summary_text": "This measure would have temporarily reallocated funds from California's mental health services program to help address the state's budget deficit. The measure failed, with only 33.5% of voters supporting the temporary funding reallocation.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1E", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1E_(2009)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2009/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2009", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201E%202009", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201E%202009", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 6829, "fingerprint": "2009|200900055|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900055|TULARE", "content_hash": "c5423b3592286532", "measure_id": "200900055", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve quality of education, shall Springville Union Elementary School District be authorized to acquire, improve and construct school facilities, including a cafeteria/multipurpose room for school and community use, new classrooms to relieve overcrowding, modernization of facilities, new community and student sports fields and qualify the District for State matching funds, by issuing $6,735,000 of bonds at interest rates below legal limits with an independent citizens' oversight commitee and NO money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 561, "no_votes": 744, "total_votes": 1305, "percent_yes": 42.988506, "percent_no": 57.011494, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.162468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.246113", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve quality of education, shall Springville Union Elementary School District be authorized to acquire, improve and construct school facilities, including a cafeteria/multipurpose room for school and community use, new classrooms to relieve overcrowding, modernization of facilities, new community and student sports fields and qualify the District for State matching funds, by issuing $6,735,000 of bonds at interest rates below legal limits with an independent citizens' oversight commitee and NO money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6830, "fingerprint": "2009|200900170|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900170|TULARE", "content_hash": "27aa14b83cc00c78", "measure_id": "200900170", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Dinuba's UUT Modernization/Protect Vital City Services Measure To maintain Dinuba services bt protecting local funds to retain police officers, firefighters/paramedics, gang/drug prevention programs, maitain parks, after-school programs, graffiti removal, senior programs, and other services, shall Dinuba modernize and continue collecting its existing utility user's tax, ensuring equal treatment of taxpayers, independent audits, budget reviews, low-income senior exemptions, with all funds staying locally in Dinuba and no increase in tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1204, "no_votes": 660, "total_votes": 1864, "percent_yes": 64.59227, "percent_no": 35.40773, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.162796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.246295", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Dinuba's UUT Modernization/Protect Vital City Services Measure To maintain Dinuba services bt protecting local funds to retain police officers, firefighters/paramedics, gang/drug prevention programs, maitain parks, after-school programs, graffiti removal, senior programs, and other services, shall Dinuba modernize and continue collecting its existing utility user's tax, ensuring equal treatment of taxpayers, independent audits, budget reviews, low-income senior exemptions, with all funds staying locally in Dinuba and no increase in tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6831, "fingerprint": "2009|200900171|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900171|TULARE", "content_hash": "3d541032d3a361e5", "measure_id": "200900171", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 09-04 be adopted amending sections of the Utility Users Tax Ordinance to reduce the maximum tax rate from 7% to 6%, and remove the maximum tax cap and provide authority for an annual review by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2344, "no_votes": 479, "total_votes": 2823, "percent_yes": 83.03223, "percent_no": 16.96777, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.163065", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.246476", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 09-04 be adopted amending sections of the Utility Users Tax Ordinance to reduce the maximum tax rate from 7% to 6%, and remove the maximum tax cap and provide authority for an annual review by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6832, "fingerprint": "2009|200900190|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900190|TULARE", "content_hash": "74656acf03f1a8b4", "measure_id": "200900190", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Springville Union Elementary School District be authorized to acquire, improve and construct school facilities, including a cafeteria/multipurpose room for school and community use, new classrooms to relieve overcrowding, modernization of facilities, new community and student sports fields and qualify the District for State matching funds, by issuing $6,735,000 of bonds at interest rates below legal limits with an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 485, "no_votes": 943, "total_votes": 1428, "percent_yes": 33.963585, "percent_no": 66.036415, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.163341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.246665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Springville Union Elementary School District be authorized to acquire, improve and construct school facilities, including a cafeteria/multipurpose room for school and community use, new classrooms to relieve overcrowding, modernization of facilities, new community and student sports fields and qualify the District for State matching funds, by issuing $6,735,000 of bonds at interest rates below legal limits with an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6833, "fingerprint": "2009|200900056|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900056|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "c6ecc848861e0c91", "measure_id": "200900056", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Mary Kelly be recalled (removed) from the office of Trustee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1381, "no_votes": 607, "total_votes": 1988, "percent_yes": 69.46679999999999, "percent_no": 30.533200000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.163613", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.246856", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Mary Kelly be recalled (removed) from the office of Trustee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6834, "fingerprint": "2009|200900057|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900057|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "1d01c39339fa40df", "measure_id": "200900057", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Bryan Berger be recalled (removed) from the office of Trustee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1390, "no_votes": 602, "total_votes": 1992, "percent_yes": 69.779116, "percent_no": 30.220883999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.163876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.247036", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Bryan Berger be recalled (removed) from the office of Trustee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6835, "fingerprint": "2009|200900058|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900058|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "d1342b6a6c88a08d", "measure_id": "200900058", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Lillian Cravens be recalled (removed) from the office of Trustee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1445, "no_votes": 554, "total_votes": 1999, "percent_yes": 72.28614, "percent_no": 27.713859999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.164140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.247215", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Lillian Cravens be recalled (removed) from the office of Trustee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6836, "fingerprint": "2009|200900059|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900059|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "fdde3fa4ace0ec2d", "measure_id": "200900059", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Dave Gookin be recalled (removed) from the office of Trustee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1373, "no_votes": 625, "total_votes": 1998, "percent_yes": 68.71872, "percent_no": 31.281279999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.164488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.247394", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Dave Gookin be recalled (removed) from the office of Trustee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6837, "fingerprint": "2009|200900060|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900060|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "7ce3c3e59e09d6af", "measure_id": "200900060", "measure_letter": "5", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Charles Day be recalled (removed) from the office of Trustee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1384, "no_votes": 613, "total_votes": 1997, "percent_yes": 69.303954, "percent_no": 30.696045999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-05-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.164754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.247621", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charles Day be recalled (removed) from the office of Trustee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6839, "fingerprint": "2009|200900173|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900173|VENTURA", "content_hash": "52481a01bf8e5860", "measure_id": "200900173", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ventura adopt a one-half percent (0.5%) Sales Tax Ordinance to expire automatically in four years, with all money staying local in Ventura, to preserve essential general fund services such as police, fire and emergency response and provide additional funding for other priorities, including street repair, keeping Wright Library open and protecting local beaches from pollution, with a citizen's oversight committee, mandatory audits and quarterly reports to the council on how the money is spent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10256, "no_votes": 12719, "total_votes": 22975, "percent_yes": 44.639826, "percent_no": 55.360174, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.165290", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.248009", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ventura adopt a one-half percent (0.5%) Sales Tax Ordinance to expire automatically in four years, with all money staying local in Ventura, to preserve essential general fund services such as police, fire and emergency response and provide additional funding for other priorities, including street repair, keeping Wright Library open and protecting local beaches from pollution, with a citizen's oversight committee, mandatory audits and quarterly reports to the council on how the money is spent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6840, "fingerprint": "2009|200900174|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900174|VENTURA", "content_hash": "4baaef7c5aef094b", "measure_id": "200900174", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted to implement general plan objectives, to preserve viewsheds by establishing a 23-member View Resources Board appointed predominantly by VCORD to prepare a View Protection Ordinance (VPO); enact a temporary moratorium on new development approvals exceeding 26 feet in height in specified areas until VPO approval or two-year limit expires, and; require City Council to approve the VPO or allow View Resources Board member(s) to submit VPO initiative to voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5751, "no_votes": 16900, "total_votes": 22651, "percent_yes": 25.38961, "percent_no": 74.61039, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.165559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.248194", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted to implement general plan objectives, to preserve viewsheds by establishing a 23-member View Resources Board appointed predominantly by VCORD to prepare a View Protection Ordinance (VPO); enact a temporary moratorium on new development approvals exceeding 26 feet in height in specified areas until VPO approval or two-year limit expires, and; require City Council to approve the VPO or allow View Resources Board member(s) to submit VPO initiative to voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6841, "fingerprint": "2009|200900175|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900175|VENTURA", "content_hash": "a166001842597db6", "measure_id": "200900175", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted to preserve Ventura's unique character, protect local businesses, and limit traffic by prohibiting new superstores larger than ninety thousand (90,000) square feet when more than three percent (3%) of the sales floor area offers non-taxable merchandise? Wholesale clubs and establishments selling primarily bulk merchandise and charging membership dues are exempt. Superstores open and operating as of January 1, 2008 would be permitted to continue in operation.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10604, "no_votes": 12301, "total_votes": 22905, "percent_yes": 46.295568, "percent_no": 53.704432, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.165889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.248378", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted to preserve Ventura's unique character, protect local businesses, and limit traffic by prohibiting new superstores larger than ninety thousand (90,000) square feet when more than three percent (3%) of the sales floor area offers non-taxable merchandise? Wholesale clubs and establishments selling primarily bulk merchandise and charging membership dues are exempt. Superstores open and operating as of January 1, 2008 would be permitted to continue in operation.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6842, "fingerprint": "2009|200900191|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900191|VENTURA", "content_hash": "f8220fbfc21f2807", "measure_id": "200900191", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education for children with math and science programs; to keep school Libraries open; to increase resources and class support with computers and technology; to maintain preschool programs; to retain quality teachers and avoid layoffs, preschool programs; to retain quality teachers and to avoid layoffs, shall Oxnard School District be authorized to levy $99 per parcel annually, with an exemption for senior citizens and mandatory citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4177, "no_votes": 4671, "total_votes": 8848, "percent_yes": 47.208408, "percent_no": 52.791592, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.166157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.248562", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education for children with math and science programs; to keep school Libraries open; to increase resources and class support with computers and technology; to maintain preschool programs; to retain quality teachers and avoid layoffs, preschool programs; to retain quality teachers and to avoid layoffs, shall Oxnard School District be authorized to levy $99 per parcel annually, with an exemption for senior citizens and mandatory citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6838, "fingerprint": "2009|200900172|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900172|VENTURA", "content_hash": "291cc1b8914aca7e", "measure_id": "200900172", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fillmore's General Plan be amended to create a \"Mobile Home Exclusive\" zone, and the City's Municipal Code be amended to adopt mobilehome rent control for qualifying low income residents, and to amend the City's condominium conversion ordinance to more readily permit the conversation of rental mobilehome parks to resident ownership?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 181, "no_votes": 1119, "total_votes": 1300, "percent_yes": 13.923077, "percent_no": 86.076923, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.165022", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.247815", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fillmore's General Plan be amended to create a \"Mobile Home Exclusive\" zone, and the City's Municipal Code be amended to adopt mobilehome rent control for qualifying low income residents, and to amend the City's condominium conversion ordinance to more readily permit the conversation of rental mobilehome parks to resident ownership?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6843, "fingerprint": "2009|200900027|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900027|YOLO", "content_hash": "5d28243c91cec2e9", "measure_id": "200900027", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To acquire, maitain, operate, and improve the Wild Wings Golf Course, shall the Wild Wings County Service Area levy a special tax not to exceed (a) $900.00 on each residential parcel from the certification of this election and CSA acquisition of the golf course, whichever is later, through June 30, 2009; and (b) $1,700.00 annually on each residential parcel, effective July 1, 2009, subject to cost of living adjustments not to exceed four percent annually thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 318, "no_votes": 101, "total_votes": 419, "percent_yes": 75.89498999999999, "percent_no": 24.105010000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-03-10", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.166422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.248742", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, maitain, operate, and improve the Wild Wings Golf Course, shall the Wild Wings County Service Area levy a special tax not to exceed (a) $900.00 on each residential parcel from the certification of this election and CSA acquisition of the golf course, whichever is later, through June 30, 2009; and (b) $1,700.00 annually on each residential parcel, effective July 1, 2009, subject to cost of living adjustments not to exceed four percent annually thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6844, "fingerprint": "2009|200900176|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2009|200900176|YOLO", "content_hash": "fa66c7e0d77b9c38", "measure_id": "200900176", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2009, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall resolution No. 09-132, amending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designations for the Wildhorse Ranch Property from agriculture to residential uses, as set forth in the Resolution and establishing the Base Line Project Features for development of the Wildhorse Ranch Project to be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3201, "no_votes": 9465, "total_votes": 12666, "percent_yes": 25.27238, "percent_no": 74.72762, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2009-11-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.166693", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.248925", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall resolution No. 09-132, amending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designations for the Wildhorse Ranch Property from agriculture to residential uses, as set forth in the Resolution and establishing the Base Line Project Features for development of the Wildhorse Ranch Project to be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6845, "fingerprint": "2008|200800001|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800001|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8f8baf77248c0043", "measure_id": "200800001", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Alameda County impose and collect a special tax on real property parcels in the County commencing on July 1, 2008 and continuing for thirty-five years at rates set forth in the measure, for the purposes of funding grants to Children's Hospital and Research Center Oakland for the construction, expansion, remodeling, renovation, furnishing and equipping projects for Children's Hospital, reimbursing County costs for administration of the tax and ensuring continuing public use of the facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 165330, "no_votes": 235671, "total_votes": 401001, "percent_yes": 41.229323, "percent_no": 58.770677, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.167045", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.249107", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Alameda County impose and collect a special tax on real property parcels in the County commencing on July 1, 2008 and continuing for thirty-five years at rates set forth in the measure, for the purposes of funding grants to Children's Hospital and Research Center Oakland for the construction, expansion, remodeling, renovation, furnishing and equipping projects for Children's Hospital, reimbursing County costs for administration of the tax and ensuring continuing public use of the facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6865, "fingerprint": "2008|200800288|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800288|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2b5fad0e3c684efb", "measure_id": "200800288", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve the modification of Section 4.03 of the City Charter, as is fully set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide that the City Council shall by ordinance set threshold limits for the requirements for formal competitive bidding and shall establish such other procedures as are necessary for undertaking the completion of any public projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5390, "no_votes": 1272, "total_votes": 6662, "percent_yes": 80.90663599999999, "percent_no": 19.093364000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.173364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.252978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve the modification of Section 4.03 of the City Charter, as is fully set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide that the City Council shall by ordinance set threshold limits for the requirements for formal competitive bidding and shall establish such other procedures as are necessary for undertaking the completion of any public projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6846, "fingerprint": "2008|200800002|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800002|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d70267a21d7ea696", "measure_id": "200800002", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Alameda County impose and collect a special tax on real property parcels in the County commencing on July 1, 2008 and continuing for thirty years at rates set forth in the measure for the purpose of funding grants to Children's Hospital and Research Center Oakland for the construction, expansion, remodeling, renovation, furnishing and equipping projects for Children's Hospital?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 122676, "no_votes": 272288, "total_votes": 394964, "percent_yes": 31.060046000000003, "percent_no": 68.939954, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.167464", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.249289", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Alameda County impose and collect a special tax on real property parcels in the County commencing on July 1, 2008 and continuing for thirty years at rates set forth in the measure for the purpose of funding grants to Children's Hospital and Research Center Oakland for the construction, expansion, remodeling, renovation, furnishing and equipping projects for Children's Hospital?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6866, "fingerprint": "2008|200800289|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800289|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "4a76b94ce306f80a", "measure_id": "200800289", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve the modification of amending the Albany City Charter to provide that council members shall receive $300.00 per month as salary, as is now authorized for general law cities of a similar size by Government Code Section 36516(a)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3844, "no_votes": 3176, "total_votes": 7020, "percent_yes": 54.757833, "percent_no": 45.242167, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.173642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.253155", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve the modification of amending the Albany City Charter to provide that council members shall receive $300.00 per month as salary, as is now authorized for general law cities of a similar size by Government Code Section 36516(a)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6849, "fingerprint": "2008|200800101|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800101|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8e74fdd822340f38", "measure_id": "200800101", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 8.01 of the Piedmont City Charter be amended to establish the date for the general municipal elections to be on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of February of even numbered years, as more fully set forth in Resolution 87-07 of the Piedmont City Council on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3193, "no_votes": 290, "total_votes": 3483, "percent_yes": 91.673845, "percent_no": 8.326155, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.168297", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.249844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 8.01 of the Piedmont City Charter be amended to establish the date for the general municipal elections to be on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of February of even numbered years, as more fully set forth in Resolution 87-07 of the Piedmont City Council on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6867, "fingerprint": "2008|200800290|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800290|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "4f136e7f4a1886e7", "measure_id": "200800290", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve the modification of Section 2.04, MEETINGS, of the City Charter, as is set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide that the City Council, by resolution or ordinance, shall set the time when City Council meetings are held?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5522, "no_votes": 1228, "total_votes": 6750, "percent_yes": 81.807405, "percent_no": 18.192594999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.173911", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.253332", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve the modification of Section 2.04, MEETINGS, of the City Charter, as is set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide that the City Council, by resolution or ordinance, shall set the time when City Council meetings are held?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6850, "fingerprint": "2008|200800102|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800102|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d8088cd8b687d616", "measure_id": "200800102", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential services and prevent a reduction in maintenance of city facilities, shall the City of Piedmont authorize a new Municipal Services Tax at the same level authorized by the current tax measure, adjusted for inflation, as more specifically set forth in Ord. 674 N.S. which is on file with the City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2616, "no_votes": 925, "total_votes": 3541, "percent_yes": 73.877436, "percent_no": 26.122563999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.168706", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.250024", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential services and prevent a reduction in maintenance of city facilities, shall the City of Piedmont authorize a new Municipal Services Tax at the same level authorized by the current tax measure, adjusted for inflation, as more specifically set forth in Ord. 674 N.S. which is on file with the City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6868, "fingerprint": "2008|200800291|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800291|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d810de4cbc87791c", "measure_id": "200800291", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Albany Municipal Code, Chapter 4-5 entitled \"Real Property Transfer Tax\" be amended in Section 4-5.2 to provide for an increase in the tax rate from $11.50 per $1,000.00 to $14.50 per $1,000.00 of the value of consideration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3130, "no_votes": 3842, "total_votes": 6972, "percent_yes": 44.89386, "percent_no": 55.10614, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.174189", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.253516", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Albany Municipal Code, Chapter 4-5 entitled \"Real Property Transfer Tax\" be amended in Section 4-5.2 to provide for an increase in the tax rate from $11.50 per $1,000.00 to $14.50 per $1,000.00 of the value of consideration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6847, "fingerprint": "2008|200800050|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800050|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "eba8d1c28145ff85", "measure_id": "200800050", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to reconstruct and replace the Albany School District Community Pool (including showers, lockers and related facilities) to provide students and the community with adequate swimming facilities for school; adult school; athletic competition; recreational and community use, including therapeutic and instructional swim, with additional high school classrooms, shall the Albany Unified School District issue $10,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4667, "no_votes": 1800, "total_votes": 6467, "percent_yes": 72.166383, "percent_no": 27.833617000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.167735", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.249476", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to reconstruct and replace the Albany School District Community Pool (including showers, lockers and related facilities) to provide students and the community with adequate swimming facilities for school; adult school; athletic competition; recreational and community use, including therapeutic and instructional swim, with additional high school classrooms, shall the Albany Unified School District issue $10,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6869, "fingerprint": "2008|200800292|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800292|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d644db8fc89a8d33", "measure_id": "200800292", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Albany Municipal Code, Chapter 4-8 entitled \"Paramedic Advanced Life Support Fire Engines and Ambulance Special Tax\" be amended to provide that the City Council may increase the tax commencing in fiscal year 2010 \u00ad 2011 and on an annual basis thereafter by 4%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4509, "no_votes": 2539, "total_votes": 7048, "percent_yes": 63.975596, "percent_no": 36.024404, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.174465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.253731", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Albany Municipal Code, Chapter 4-8 entitled \"Paramedic Advanced Life Support Fire Engines and Ambulance Special Tax\" be amended to provide that the City Council may increase the tax commencing in fiscal year 2010 \u00ad 2011 and on an annual basis thereafter by 4%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6851, "fingerprint": "2008|200800115|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800115|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1d18c2a645dffaa3", "measure_id": "200800115", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved to extend until 6/30/2021 the existing Utility Users Tax, collected only in the unincorporated areas (e.g., Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview, San Lorenzo, Sunol), which may fund County services, including services to unincorporated areas (e.g., Sheriff, Library, Planning and Code enforcement), establishing the rate of 6.5% and further amending the tax to include video and cable services, repeal limitations on taxes paid by nonresidential users, and making clarifying and administrative changes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125436, "no_votes": 65294, "total_votes": 190730, "percent_yes": 65.76627, "percent_no": 34.233729999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.168973", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.250203", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved to extend until 6/30/2021 the existing Utility Users Tax, collected only in the unincorporated areas (e.g., Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview, San Lorenzo, Sunol), which may fund County services, including services to unincorporated areas (e.g., Sheriff, Library, Planning and Code enforcement), establishing the rate of 6.5% and further amending the tax to include video and cable services, repeal limitations on taxes paid by nonresidential users, and making clarifying and administrative changes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6872, "fingerprint": "2008|200800295|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800295|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "02a3520f4fb11869", "measure_id": "200800295", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds not exceeding $26,000,000 to renovate, expand, and make seismic and access improvements at four neighborhood branch libraries, but not the Central Library, with annual reporting by the Library Board to the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37973, "no_votes": 17861, "total_votes": 55834, "percent_yes": 68.01053, "percent_no": 31.989469999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.175336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.254298", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds not exceeding $26,000,000 to renovate, expand, and make seismic and access improvements at four neighborhood branch libraries, but not the Central Library, with annual reporting by the Library Board to the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6848, "fingerprint": "2008|200800051|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800051|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "062c74415b7f89de", "measure_id": "200800051", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers, maintain courses that help students qualify for college, maintain up-to-date textbooks and instructional materials, keep class sizes small, continue after-school academic programs, maintain school libraries, and provide programs, including arts and music, that enhance student achievement, shall Oakland Unified School District, without increasing the current rate, continue to levy its education special tax of $195 per parcel, commencing July 1, 2009, exempting low-income taxpayers, and with all money benefiting Oakland schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 87837, "no_votes": 22789, "total_votes": 110626, "percent_yes": 79.39996000000001, "percent_no": 20.600039999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.168002", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.249658", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers, maintain courses that help students qualify for college, maintain up-to-date textbooks and instructional materials, keep class sizes small, continue after-school academic programs, maintain school libraries, and provide programs, including arts and music, that enhance student achievement, shall Oakland Unified School District, without increasing the current rate, continue to levy its education special tax of $195 per parcel, commencing July 1, 2009, exempting low-income taxpayers, and with all money benefiting Oakland schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6873, "fingerprint": "2008|200800296|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800296|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "59dcf0d1bad19fcd", "measure_id": "200800296", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To enable the City to keep fire stations open and improve emergency medical response and disaster preparedness, shall a special tax be authorized of $.04083 per square foot of improvements in dwelling units and $.06179 per square foot on all other improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40513, "no_votes": 15964, "total_votes": 56477, "percent_yes": 71.73362399999999, "percent_no": 28.266376000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.175606", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.254477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable the City to keep fire stations open and improve emergency medical response and disaster preparedness, shall a special tax be authorized of $.04083 per square foot of improvements in dwelling units and $.06179 per square foot on all other improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6854, "fingerprint": "2008|200800169|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800169|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "659c46932fd3db04", "measure_id": "200800169", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts to Alameda schools, minimize school closures, and protect the quality of education, student safety, class sizes, excellent teachers and staff and to restore prioritized cuts to music, athletics, advanced placement courses, shall Alameda Unified School District levy a temporary, 4-year emergency tax of $120 per residential parcel and 15 cents per square foot for commercial/industrial parcels (see voter pamphlet), with exceptions for seniors, citizen oversight and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11445, "no_votes": 5663, "total_votes": 17108, "percent_yes": 66.89852499999999, "percent_no": 33.10147500000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.169768", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.250749", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts to Alameda schools, minimize school closures, and protect the quality of education, student safety, class sizes, excellent teachers and staff and to restore prioritized cuts to music, athletics, advanced placement courses, shall Alameda Unified School District levy a temporary, 4-year emergency tax of $120 per residential parcel and 15 cents per square foot for commercial/industrial parcels (see voter pamphlet), with exceptions for seniors, citizen oversight and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6874, "fingerprint": "2008|200800297|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800297|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e6b508b56a35650c", "measure_id": "200800297", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (or ceiling on city expenditures) be increased to allow for the expenditure of taxes previously approved by voters for parks maintenance; libraries; emergency medical services (EMS), and emergency services for severely disabled persons for fiscal years 2009 through 2012?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41178, "no_votes": 12148, "total_votes": 53326, "percent_yes": 77.21937, "percent_no": 22.780630000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.175880", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.254701", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (or ceiling on city expenditures) be increased to allow for the expenditure of taxes previously approved by voters for parks maintenance; libraries; emergency medical services (EMS), and emergency services for severely disabled persons for fiscal years 2009 through 2012?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6855, "fingerprint": "2008|200800170|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800170|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2ddb9aa0fcfcfd0b", "measure_id": "200800170", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety and learning by construction, furnishing and equipping school facilities; reconstruction, rehabilitating, or replacing deteriorating schools; providing security systems, new or modernized permanent classrooms, land for construction, wireless technology, access for individuals with disabilities, and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Hayward Unified School District issue $205 million in bonds not to exceed maximum legal interest, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11546, "no_votes": 4454, "total_votes": 16000, "percent_yes": 72.1625, "percent_no": 27.837500000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.170198", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.250931", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety and learning by construction, furnishing and equipping school facilities; reconstruction, rehabilitating, or replacing deteriorating schools; providing security systems, new or modernized permanent classrooms, land for construction, wireless technology, access for individuals with disabilities, and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Hayward Unified School District issue $205 million in bonds not to exceed maximum legal interest, with independent citizen oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6875, "fingerprint": "2008|200800298|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800298|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d4b39d7bb3903641", "measure_id": "200800298", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Berkeley Charter be amended to give the City until December 31st of the third year following the decennial census to adopt new council districts that are as nearly equal in population as feasible?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39372, "no_votes": 10807, "total_votes": 50179, "percent_yes": 78.4631, "percent_no": 21.536900000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.176147", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.254893", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Berkeley Charter be amended to give the City until December 31st of the third year following the decennial census to adopt new council districts that are as nearly equal in population as feasible?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6852, "fingerprint": "2008|200800133|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800133|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "de3e03308c985a04", "measure_id": "200800133", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without raising current tax rates, shall Oakland's existing telephone utility user tax be modernized so that tax payers are treated equally regardless of technology used?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44694, "no_votes": 11460, "total_votes": 56154, "percent_yes": 79.591835, "percent_no": 20.408164999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.169238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.250382", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without raising current tax rates, shall Oakland's existing telephone utility user tax be modernized so that tax payers are treated equally regardless of technology used?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6876, "fingerprint": "2008|200800299|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800299|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "22f042018135a6a1", "measure_id": "200800299", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City's ordinances be amended to eliminate limits on medical marijuana possessed by patients or caregivers; establish a peer review group for medical marijuana collectives to police themselves; and permit medical marijuana dispensaries as a matter of right under the zoning ordinance rather than through a use permit subject to a public hearing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34502, "no_votes": 20515, "total_votes": 55017, "percent_yes": 62.711525, "percent_no": 37.288475, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.176412", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.255074", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City's ordinances be amended to eliminate limits on medical marijuana possessed by patients or caregivers; establish a peer review group for medical marijuana collectives to police themselves; and permit medical marijuana dispensaries as a matter of right under the zoning ordinance rather than through a use permit subject to a public hearing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6853, "fingerprint": "2008|200800134|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800134|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a1aecd42d1e05a82", "measure_id": "200800134", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing Public Safety Services Tax be extended and enhanced to expire in twenty years, with adjusted tax rates and an annual adjustment cap of 3%, in order to fund current and expanded police and fire protection services, youth violence prevention and intervention programs and services, and emergency preparedness supplies and services, in Union City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3950, "no_votes": 2414, "total_votes": 6364, "percent_yes": 62.06788399999999, "percent_no": 37.93211600000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.169503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.250564", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing Public Safety Services Tax be extended and enhanced to expire in twenty years, with adjusted tax rates and an annual adjustment cap of 3%, in order to fund current and expanded police and fire protection services, youth violence prevention and intervention programs and services, and emergency preparedness supplies and services, in Union City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6877, "fingerprint": "2008|200800300|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800300|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1eec6c1ca990226f", "measure_id": "200800300", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance Requiring Voter Approval of Exclusive Transit-Only and HOV/Bus-Only Lanes be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12427, "no_votes": 40914, "total_votes": 53341, "percent_yes": 23.297276, "percent_no": 76.702724, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.176757", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.255257", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance Requiring Voter Approval of Exclusive Transit-Only and HOV/Bus-Only Lanes be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6888, "fingerprint": "2008|200800450|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800450|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "71cd18a1f592f3df", "measure_id": "200800450", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high academic achievement in math, science, reading, writing, and technology; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; maintain small class sizes; and provide ongoing teacher training, shall the Dublin Unified School District levy $96 dollars per parcel annually for five (5) years with an exemption for seniors and disabled persons, an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries and all dollars staying in our community to maintain a high quality education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11477, "no_votes": 4335, "total_votes": 15812, "percent_yes": 72.58411, "percent_no": 27.415890000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.179858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.257294", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high academic achievement in math, science, reading, writing, and technology; attract and retain highly qualified teachers; maintain small class sizes; and provide ongoing teacher training, shall the Dublin Unified School District levy $96 dollars per parcel annually for five (5) years with an exemption for seniors and disabled persons, an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries and all dollars staying in our community to maintain a high quality education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6878, "fingerprint": "2008|200800301|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800301|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c49310a0834415ea", "measure_id": "200800301", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ordinance No. 6,958-N.S., Repealing and Reenacting Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) Chapter3.24 (Landmarks Preservation), passed by City Council, granting the Landmarks Preservation Commission new authority to prohibit, instead of suspend, demolition of historic resources; eliminating property owners' approval in establishing historic districts; and substantially revising procedures for designating historic resources (including limiting reconsideration of properties not designated) and regulating alteration or demolition of historic resources, subject to appeal to the Council, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21743, "no_votes": 28537, "total_votes": 50280, "percent_yes": 43.243834, "percent_no": 56.756166, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.177025", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.255440", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ordinance No. 6,958-N.S., Repealing and Reenacting Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) Chapter3.24 (Landmarks Preservation), passed by City Council, granting the Landmarks Preservation Commission new authority to prohibit, instead of suspend, demolition of historic resources; eliminating property owners' approval in establishing historic districts; and substantially revising procedures for designating historic resources (including limiting reconsideration of properties not designated) and regulating alteration or demolition of historic resources, subject to appeal to the Council, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6889, "fingerprint": "2008|200800451|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800451|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ffc8974623b90ab1", "measure_id": "200800451", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the quality of local schools, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and maintain small class sizes, college/career/job preparation classes, art/music/foreign language programs, computers, infrastructure and instructional technology upgrades, elementary science specialists, and high school counselors, shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District extend its expiring parcel tax for five years at $11.50/month per parcel, with a senior citizen exemption, independent oversight, no administrators' salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Livermore children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28334, "no_votes": 8698, "total_votes": 37032, "percent_yes": 76.512206, "percent_no": 23.487793999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.180204", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.257481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of local schools, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and maintain small class sizes, college/career/job preparation classes, art/music/foreign language programs, computers, infrastructure and instructional technology upgrades, elementary science specialists, and high school counselors, shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District extend its expiring parcel tax for five years at $11.50/month per parcel, with a senior citizen exemption, independent oversight, no administrators' salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Livermore children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6879, "fingerprint": "2008|200800302|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800302|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "eb88a85812d3233c", "measure_id": "200800302", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Fremont Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax (commonly called the \"hotel tax\") which is charged only to persons who occupy hotel or motel rooms in the City for 30 days or less, from the current 8% to 10%, in order to help maintain basic City services such as public safety and street and park maintenance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45574, "no_votes": 23014, "total_votes": 68588, "percent_yes": 66.44602400000001, "percent_no": 33.55397599999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.177346", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.255623", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Fremont Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax (commonly called the \"hotel tax\") which is charged only to persons who occupy hotel or motel rooms in the City for 30 days or less, from the current 8% to 10%, in order to help maintain basic City services such as public safety and street and park maintenance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6890, "fingerprint": "2008|200800452|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800452|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ba3d8d569d75467b", "measure_id": "200800452", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain highly qualified and credentialed teachers for Oakland's District-run public schools, and to support successful educational programs at Oakland's public charter schools, shall Oakland Unified School District levy $10 per parcel per month ($120 per year) for 10 years with an exemption for low-income residents, mandatory annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and all money spent to benefit Oakland Schools and all Oakland students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92132, "no_votes": 57805, "total_votes": 149937, "percent_yes": 61.447144, "percent_no": 38.552856, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.180474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.257671", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain highly qualified and credentialed teachers for Oakland's District-run public schools, and to support successful educational programs at Oakland's public charter schools, shall Oakland Unified School District levy $10 per parcel per month ($120 per year) for 10 years with an exemption for low-income residents, mandatory annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and all money spent to benefit Oakland Schools and all Oakland students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6880, "fingerprint": "2008|200800303|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800303|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c1e23ba36df7bc45", "measure_id": "200800303", "measure_letter": "NN", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide more police services to neighborhoods and businesses for the purpose of preventing crime and enhancing resources for investigation of crimes, shall the City of Oakland authorize a parcel tax to fund the cost of (1) adding a total of 105 police officers and 75 police services technicians; (2) a crime data management system for crime analysis; and (3) mandatory independent annual audits and evaluations with performance standards?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 81859, "no_votes": 68599, "total_votes": 150458, "percent_yes": 54.40655, "percent_no": 45.59345, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.177615", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.255807", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide more police services to neighborhoods and businesses for the purpose of preventing crime and enhancing resources for investigation of crimes, shall the City of Oakland authorize a parcel tax to fund the cost of (1) adding a total of 105 police officers and 75 police services technicians; (2) a crime data management system for crime analysis; and (3) mandatory independent annual audits and evaluations with performance standards?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6891, "fingerprint": "2008|200800453|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800453|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a49b2c75fc12b5e8", "measure_id": "200800453", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build new science labs, modernize aging schools, improve safety, energy efficiency, and classroom computers and technology, replace older portable classrooms, renovate athletic fields, improve traffic safety and construct, replace and renovate school facilities, shall the San Lorenzo Unified School District be authorized to issue $83,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17356, "no_votes": 5955, "total_votes": 23311, "percent_yes": 74.45412, "percent_no": 25.545879999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.180809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.257853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build new science labs, modernize aging schools, improve safety, energy efficiency, and classroom computers and technology, replace older portable classrooms, renovate athletic fields, improve traffic safety and construct, replace and renovate school facilities, shall the San Lorenzo Unified School District be authorized to issue $83,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6881, "fingerprint": "2008|200800304|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800304|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "84acdd535e5d5855", "measure_id": "200800304", "measure_letter": "OO", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase existing mandatory funding for children's and youth services, shall the City Charter be amended to (1) increase the annual set aside for grants to organizations serving children and youth to 1\u00bd % for two years and 2\u00bd % thereafter of the City's annual total revenues, with audits and an oversight committee, and (2) in addition to the set aside, increase the annual amount that the City is required to spend on children and youth?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78896, "no_votes": 69642, "total_votes": 148538, "percent_yes": 53.11503, "percent_no": 46.88497, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.177889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.255988", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase existing mandatory funding for children's and youth services, shall the City Charter be amended to (1) increase the annual set aside for grants to organizations serving children and youth to 1\u00bd % for two years and 2\u00bd % thereafter of the City's annual total revenues, with audits and an oversight committee, and (2) in addition to the set aside, increase the annual amount that the City is required to spend on children and youth?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6856, "fingerprint": "2008|200800279|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800279|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b0a66e1025737f29", "measure_id": "200800279", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential City services such as keeping existing fire stations open; maintaining neighborhood policing programs; improving traffic flow and pedestrian and bicycle safety; preventing recreation program cutbacks; and restoring previously reduced library hours; shall the City of Alameda increase the City real property transfer tax, charged when a property is sold, from $5.40 to $12.00 per $1,000.00 of value, limited to 20 years and subject to audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16178, "no_votes": 15642, "total_votes": 31820, "percent_yes": 50.84224, "percent_no": 49.15776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.170512", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.251111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential City services such as keeping existing fire stations open; maintaining neighborhood policing programs; improving traffic flow and pedestrian and bicycle safety; preventing recreation program cutbacks; and restoring previously reduced library hours; shall the City of Alameda increase the City real property transfer tax, charged when a property is sold, from $5.40 to $12.00 per $1,000.00 of value, limited to 20 years and subject to audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6882, "fingerprint": "2008|200800305|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800305|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5f4aa0049b6f0a0b", "measure_id": "200800305", "measure_letter": "PP", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Save Pleasanton's Hills and Housing Cap Citizens' Initiative be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18623, "no_votes": 12667, "total_votes": 31290, "percent_yes": 59.51742, "percent_no": 40.48258, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.178162", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.256182", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Save Pleasanton's Hills and Housing Cap Citizens' Initiative be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6857, "fingerprint": "2008|200800280|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800280|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d68c436b9abf1cbc", "measure_id": "200800280", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to delete obsolete and unclear language? Said amendments will be accomplished by amending Sections 2-4, 2- 6, 2-9, 3-7(A), 3-7(B), 3-7(C), 3-7(F), 3-7(I), 3-15, 9-1(E), 12-3(D), 17-10, 22-4, and 28- 6(A), deleting Sections 3-7(E), 3-15.1, 17-11, 23-4, 23-5, Art. XXV, and 28-6(B), and adding Section 2-16 to said Charter, all as more fully set forth in Resolution No. 14246 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22846, "no_votes": 5981, "total_votes": 28827, "percent_yes": 79.25209, "percent_no": 20.747910000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.170826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.251288", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to delete obsolete and unclear language? Said amendments will be accomplished by amending Sections 2-4, 2- 6, 2-9, 3-7(A), 3-7(B), 3-7(C), 3-7(F), 3-7(I), 3-15, 9-1(E), 12-3(D), 17-10, 22-4, and 28- 6(A), deleting Sections 3-7(E), 3-15.1, 17-11, 23-4, 23-5, Art. XXV, and 28-6(B), and adding Section 2-16 to said Charter, all as more fully set forth in Resolution No. 14246 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6883, "fingerprint": "2008|200800306|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800306|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6edff580f9d2ca61", "measure_id": "200800306", "measure_letter": "QQ", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Pleasanton Ridgelines Protection and Growth Control Initiative be adopted, that would preserve scenic hillsides and ridges surrounding Pleasanton, and affirm and implement policies that protect hillsides and define housing units that respects the voter-approved housing cap?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17142, "no_votes": 14675, "total_votes": 31817, "percent_yes": 53.87686000000001, "percent_no": 46.12313999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.178426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.256372", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Pleasanton Ridgelines Protection and Growth Control Initiative be adopted, that would preserve scenic hillsides and ridges surrounding Pleasanton, and affirm and implement policies that protect hillsides and define housing units that respects the voter-approved housing cap?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6858, "fingerprint": "2008|200800281|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800281|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1e6fbb01e99c06e3", "measure_id": "200800281", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to provide that every contract shall be in writing and that the City shall not be bound by any contract unless it complies with the Charter? Such amendment will be accomplished by adding Section 22- 13 of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14250 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23779, "no_votes": 5029, "total_votes": 28808, "percent_yes": 82.543045, "percent_no": 17.456954999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.171152", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.251466", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to provide that every contract shall be in writing and that the City shall not be bound by any contract unless it complies with the Charter? Such amendment will be accomplished by adding Section 22- 13 of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14250 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6884, "fingerprint": "2008|200800307|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800307|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "81d285397a661625", "measure_id": "200800307", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the City of San Leandro's existing utility users' tax from 6% to 5.7% on telecommunications and video (cable-like) services; ensure that users of current and future technologies be treated fairly; and preserve funding for general municipal services such as police, maintenance of and improvements to city streets and sidewalks and graffiti removal?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24265, "no_votes": 4685, "total_votes": 28950, "percent_yes": 83.81693, "percent_no": 16.18307, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.178695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.256559", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the City of San Leandro's existing utility users' tax from 6% to 5.7% on telecommunications and video (cable-like) services; ensure that users of current and future technologies be treated fairly; and preserve funding for general municipal services such as police, maintenance of and improvements to city streets and sidewalks and graffiti removal?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6859, "fingerprint": "2008|200800282|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800282|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "af8bb02a5128f57b", "measure_id": "200800282", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to provide that in an emergency the City Manager or designee may forego competitive bidding for a public work or improvement or purchase of materials or supplies to protect life, health, property or essential public services? Such amendment will be accomplished by adding Section 3-15.2, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14253 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19416, "no_votes": 9562, "total_votes": 28978, "percent_yes": 67.00255, "percent_no": 32.99745, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.171419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.251769", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to provide that in an emergency the City Manager or designee may forego competitive bidding for a public work or improvement or purchase of materials or supplies to protect life, health, property or essential public services? Such amendment will be accomplished by adding Section 3-15.2, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14253 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6885, "fingerprint": "2008|200800308|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800308|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "772eef54ec621e04", "measure_id": "200800308", "measure_letter": "SS", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Leandro, with no increase in rates, convert its existing 911 Emergency Communication System Access Fee Ordinance into an Emergency Communication System Access Tax, to insure that all future modifications to the tax rate structure require a vote of the people rather than a vote of the Council, and to maintain enhanced 911 Emergency Services to San Leandro residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22751, "no_votes": 6113, "total_votes": 28864, "percent_yes": 78.82137, "percent_no": 21.17863, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.178960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.256743", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Leandro, with no increase in rates, convert its existing 911 Emergency Communication System Access Fee Ordinance into an Emergency Communication System Access Tax, to insure that all future modifications to the tax rate structure require a vote of the people rather than a vote of the Council, and to maintain enhanced 911 Emergency Services to San Leandro residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6860, "fingerprint": "2008|200800283|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800283|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c750f738ae30a922", "measure_id": "200800283", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to provide that Council may determine when City offices are to be open for business? Such amendment will be accomplished by amending Article XXII Sec. 8 of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14252 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19045, "no_votes": 9518, "total_votes": 28563, "percent_yes": 66.67716999999999, "percent_no": 33.32283000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.171688", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.252004", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to provide that Council may determine when City offices are to be open for business? Such amendment will be accomplished by amending Article XXII Sec. 8 of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14252 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6886, "fingerprint": "2008|200800309|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800309|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e3d1f56625eed679", "measure_id": "200800309", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the current level of police protections services be maintained at a minimum of 94 sworn police officers by adoption of a parcel tax in an annual amount of $48 for single-family residences, $24 per multi-family/mobile home unit, $12 per thousand square feet for Commercial/Industrial, $10 per thousand square feet for Non- Profit/Places of Worship and $3 per thousand square feet for Unimproved Land, to end after four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15853, "no_votes": 12571, "total_votes": 28424, "percent_yes": 55.77329, "percent_no": 44.22671, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.179285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.256930", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the current level of police protections services be maintained at a minimum of 94 sworn police officers by adoption of a parcel tax in an annual amount of $48 for single-family residences, $24 per multi-family/mobile home unit, $12 per thousand square feet for Commercial/Industrial, $10 per thousand square feet for Non- Profit/Places of Worship and $3 per thousand square feet for Unimproved Land, to end after four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6861, "fingerprint": "2008|200800284|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800284|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d28d248229a644ee", "measure_id": "200800284", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to provide that the Auditor have a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) license or a related educational degree, and no bond? Such amendment will be accomplished by amending Article IV of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14247 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21623, "no_votes": 6983, "total_votes": 28606, "percent_yes": 75.589037, "percent_no": 24.410962999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.171962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.252189", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to provide that the Auditor have a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) license or a related educational degree, and no bond? Such amendment will be accomplished by amending Article IV of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14247 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6887, "fingerprint": "2008|200800310|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800310|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "63888a0e63ed530b", "measure_id": "200800310", "measure_letter": "UU", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing Public Safety Services Tax set to expire on April 23, 2009, be continued and expanded, for an additional eight (8) years, beginning April 24, 2009, in order to fund essential police and fire protection services in Union City as well as youth violence prevention and intervention programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15700, "no_votes": 5734, "total_votes": 21434, "percent_yes": 73.24811, "percent_no": 26.751890000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.179554", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.257112", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing Public Safety Services Tax set to expire on April 23, 2009, be continued and expanded, for an additional eight (8) years, beginning April 24, 2009, in order to fund essential police and fire protection services in Union City as well as youth violence prevention and intervention programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6862, "fingerprint": "2008|200800285|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800285|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "704b815b1871d28a", "measure_id": "200800285", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to require that the Treasurer be licensed as a Chartered Financial Analyst or Certified Financial Planner and annually recommend to Council an investment policy for City monies and monitor and report results of the City investment portfolio? Such amendment will be accomplished by amending Article V of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14248 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22954, "no_votes": 5509, "total_votes": 28463, "percent_yes": 80.64505, "percent_no": 19.354950000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.172230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.252382", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to require that the Treasurer be licensed as a Chartered Financial Analyst or Certified Financial Planner and annually recommend to Council an investment policy for City monies and monitor and report results of the City investment portfolio? Such amendment will be accomplished by amending Article V of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14248 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6863, "fingerprint": "2008|200800286|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800286|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a2044d012d7de515", "measure_id": "200800286", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to eliminate transportation from the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Board? Such amendment will be accomplished by amending Article 12-1(A) of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14249 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16773, "no_votes": 10321, "total_votes": 27094, "percent_yes": 61.906695, "percent_no": 38.093305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.172646", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.252603", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to eliminate transportation from the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Board? Such amendment will be accomplished by amending Article 12-1(A) of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14249 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6864, "fingerprint": "2008|200800287|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800287|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c451b6532b5f82dd", "measure_id": "200800287", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to eliminate reasons for removal of Historical Advisory Board members and to authorize the City Council to determine when it is appropriate to do so? Such amendment will be accomplished by amending Article XXVIII Sec. 5 of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14251 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15765, "no_votes": 11772, "total_votes": 27537, "percent_yes": 57.250243, "percent_no": 42.749757, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.173070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.252799", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to eliminate reasons for removal of Historical Advisory Board members and to authorize the City Council to determine when it is appropriate to do so? Such amendment will be accomplished by amending Article XXVIII Sec. 5 of said Charter, as fully set forth in Resolution No. 14251 of the Council of the City of Alameda.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6870, "fingerprint": "2008|200800293|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800293|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "53b5d0a9f3abb495", "measure_id": "200800293", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve the modifications of Sections 2.01, 2.02, 5.01, 5.02, and 5.03 of the City Charter, as is fully set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide for the electors of the City to directly elect the mayor beginning at the general election in 2012 and to provide for term limits for the mayoral position?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3305, "no_votes": 3866, "total_votes": 7171, "percent_yes": 46.088412, "percent_no": 53.911588, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.174798", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.253936", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve the modifications of Sections 2.01, 2.02, 5.01, 5.02, and 5.03 of the City Charter, as is fully set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide for the electors of the City to directly elect the mayor beginning at the general election in 2012 and to provide for term limits for the mayoral position?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6871, "fingerprint": "2008|200800294|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800294|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9612740584749557", "measure_id": "200800294", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve the modification of Section 3.23 of the City Charter, as is fully set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide that members of commissions, boards, committees, task forces, or other similar bodies, appointed by the City Council, shall serve for an interim term of up to 45 days after certification of an election, or until they are reappointed or replaced?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5375, "no_votes": 1298, "total_votes": 6673, "percent_yes": 80.54848, "percent_no": 19.451520000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.175068", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.254118", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve the modification of Section 3.23 of the City Charter, as is fully set forth in the voter pamphlet, to provide that members of commissions, boards, committees, task forces, or other similar bodies, appointed by the City Council, shall serve for an interim term of up to 45 days after certification of an election, or until they are reappointed or replaced?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6892, "fingerprint": "2008|200800222|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800222|AMADOR", "content_hash": "b9fbc87afcaa8665", "measure_id": "200800222", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Amador County enact a one-half cent sales tax for fire protection and emergency response services, with the proceeds allocated to local fire districts as described in Ordinance No. 1676 (including reallocation to reflect any changes in the number of districts), to be used for paid fire fighter-emergency medical response personnel to staff existing fire stations, administrative support, and volunteer insurance, training and incentive programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12075, "no_votes": 5349, "total_votes": 17424, "percent_yes": 69.30096, "percent_no": 30.699039999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.181121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.258034", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Amador County enact a one-half cent sales tax for fire protection and emergency response services, with the proceeds allocated to local fire districts as described in Ordinance No. 1676 (including reallocation to reflect any changes in the number of districts), to be used for paid fire fighter-emergency medical response personnel to staff existing fire stations, administrative support, and volunteer insurance, training and incentive programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6893, "fingerprint": "2008|200800052|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800052|BUTTE", "content_hash": "c9cde1679aab01b0", "measure_id": "200800052", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify for state matching funds, fix leaky, deteriorated roofs, improve fire safety, repair and upgrade classrooms, heating/ventilation systems for energy efficiency, and update science, computer and instructional technology, shall Biggs Unified School District issue $4,275,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 530, "no_votes": 555, "total_votes": 1085, "percent_yes": 48.847926, "percent_no": 51.152074, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.181450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.258217", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify for state matching funds, fix leaky, deteriorated roofs, improve fire safety, repair and upgrade classrooms, heating/ventilation systems for energy efficiency, and update science, computer and instructional technology, shall Biggs Unified School District issue $4,275,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6894, "fingerprint": "2008|200800454|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800454|BUTTE", "content_hash": "2b9aaa2a64cf969d", "measure_id": "200800454", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, qualify for $4,000,000 state matching funds, fix leaky roofs, improve fire safety, repair and modernize classrooms, upgrade electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation systems for energy efficiency, and update science and computer technology, shall Biggs Unified School District issue $6,900,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct and equip neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 644, "no_votes": 764, "total_votes": 1408, "percent_yes": 45.738637, "percent_no": 54.261363, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.181782", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.258412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, qualify for $4,000,000 state matching funds, fix leaky roofs, improve fire safety, repair and modernize classrooms, upgrade electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation systems for energy efficiency, and update science and computer technology, shall Biggs Unified School District issue $6,900,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct and equip neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6896, "fingerprint": "2008|200800456|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800456|BUTTE", "content_hash": "2bb426714d0247a1", "measure_id": "200800456", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To remodel and upgrade the Harrison Stadium Sports Complex, including synthetic all weather track, football and soccer fields, paved parking, bleachers, disabled access, press box, bathrooms, landscaping, irrigation, scoreboards and lights, and using any remaining bond proceeds to improve Oroville High School and Las Plumas High School athletic facilities, shall the Oroville Union High School District issue $12,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10978, "no_votes": 7574, "total_votes": 18552, "percent_yes": 59.174216, "percent_no": 40.825784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.182482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.258788", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To remodel and upgrade the Harrison Stadium Sports Complex, including synthetic all weather track, football and soccer fields, paved parking, bleachers, disabled access, press box, bathrooms, landscaping, irrigation, scoreboards and lights, and using any remaining bond proceeds to improve Oroville High School and Las Plumas High School athletic facilities, shall the Oroville Union High School District issue $12,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6895, "fingerprint": "2008|200800455|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800455|BUTTE", "content_hash": "f1ecbb786a0f0b64", "measure_id": "200800455", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue improving the quality of education in local schools and protecting the safety of our children, by repairing, replacing or updating fire alarm systems, worn-out roofs, outdated classrooms and science labs, plumbing and heating/air conditioning systems; and to help qualify for State matching funds for school modernization and construction, shall the Marysville Joint Unified School District issue $47,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 150, "no_votes": 106, "total_votes": 256, "percent_yes": 58.59375, "percent_no": 41.40625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.182204", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.258606", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue improving the quality of education in local schools and protecting the safety of our children, by repairing, replacing or updating fire alarm systems, worn-out roofs, outdated classrooms and science labs, plumbing and heating/air conditioning systems; and to help qualify for State matching funds for school modernization and construction, shall the Marysville Joint Unified School District issue $47,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6897, "fingerprint": "2008|200800457|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800457|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "f146a5184e49b24f", "measure_id": "200800457", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and job training, shall Bret Harte Union High School District issue $18,000,000 in bonds at legal rates to construct, improve and equip schools, sites, buildings, joint-use facilities, restrooms, install energy efficient HVAC systems, replace aging temporary classrooms, improve science labs, classrooms, grounds, fields and facilities for student and community use, with mandatory financial audits, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6167, "no_votes": 4128, "total_votes": 10295, "percent_yes": 59.902865000000006, "percent_no": 40.097134999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.182759", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.258978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and job training, shall Bret Harte Union High School District issue $18,000,000 in bonds at legal rates to construct, improve and equip schools, sites, buildings, joint-use facilities, restrooms, install energy efficient HVAC systems, replace aging temporary classrooms, improve science labs, classrooms, grounds, fields and facilities for student and community use, with mandatory financial audits, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6898, "fingerprint": "2008|200800311|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800311|COLUSA", "content_hash": "d53103bed0c15e3d", "measure_id": "200800311", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Colusa Ordinance No. 439 levying a transactions and use tax of one-quarter of one-percent (0.25%) within the city limits, with tax revenues to be used for general municipal purposes, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 779, "no_votes": 1026, "total_votes": 1805, "percent_yes": 43.157893, "percent_no": 56.842107, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.183058", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.259170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Colusa Ordinance No. 439 levying a transactions and use tax of one-quarter of one-percent (0.25%) within the city limits, with tax revenues to be used for general municipal purposes, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6899, "fingerprint": "2008|200800312|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800312|COLUSA", "content_hash": "794c33d8801bfe81", "measure_id": "200800312", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the revenue from the transactions and use tax of one-quarter of one percent (0.25%) proposed by Ordinance No.439 be used to fund City of Colusa police and fire benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 903, "no_votes": 901, "total_votes": 1804, "percent_yes": 50.05543, "percent_no": 49.94457, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.183324", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.259351", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the revenue from the transactions and use tax of one-quarter of one percent (0.25%) proposed by Ordinance No.439 be used to fund City of Colusa police and fire benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6900, "fingerprint": "2008|200800313|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800313|COLUSA", "content_hash": "1ad3e25593a8d43a", "measure_id": "200800313", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the city clerk for the City of Colusa be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 810, "no_votes": 947, "total_votes": 1757, "percent_yes": 46.101308, "percent_no": 53.898692, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.183592", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.259540", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the city clerk for the City of Colusa be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6902, "fingerprint": "2008|200800017|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800017|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3b35a63d4648d68d", "measure_id": "200800017", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Maria Alegria be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3498, "no_votes": 2494, "total_votes": 5992, "percent_yes": 58.377840000000006, "percent_no": 41.622159999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.184121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.259902", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Maria Alegria be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6903, "fingerprint": "2008|200800018|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800018|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d6d9edb89ab1b324", "measure_id": "200800018", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Stephen Tilton be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3357, "no_votes": 2493, "total_votes": 5850, "percent_yes": 57.384616, "percent_no": 42.615384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.184384", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.260085", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Stephen Tilton be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 11556, "fingerprint": "2008|200800459|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800459|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3df844dab78e16a2", "measure_id": "200800459", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize, upgrade, equip and furnish John Swett High School and its related athletic and support facilities, to provide improved, safe, and technologically advanced academic and athletic facilities, and to become eligible for state matching funds for school facilities including joint-use and career technical education facilities, shall the John Swett Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit subject to the accountability safeguards required by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3950, "no_votes": 1400, "total_votes": 5350, "percent_yes": 73.83176999999999, "percent_no": 26.16823000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.274938", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.189850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.263381", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize, upgrade, equip and furnish John Swett High School and its related athletic and support facilities, to provide improved, safe, and technologically advanced academic and athletic facilities, and to become eligible for state matching funds for school facilities including joint-use and career technical education facilities, shall the John Swett Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit subject to the accountability safeguards required by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6901, "fingerprint": "2008|200800016|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800016|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "46061e1a6995f26d", "measure_id": "200800016", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve neighborhood streets; enhance road safety citywide by fixing potholes; maintaining, repairing and repaving streets; sealing cracks; improving handicap ramps, crosswalks, bicycle lanes; and maintaining road markings and signage, shall the City of El Cerrito incur debt to immediately begin and accelerate street improvements, paid by establishing a dedicated one-half cent sales tax used exclusively for street improvements, with citizens' oversight and independent audits of expenditure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6860, "no_votes": 2791, "total_votes": 9651, "percent_yes": 71.080714, "percent_no": 28.919286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.183855", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.259721", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood streets; enhance road safety citywide by fixing potholes; maintaining, repairing and repaving streets; sealing cracks; improving handicap ramps, crosswalks, bicycle lanes; and maintaining road markings and signage, shall the City of El Cerrito incur debt to immediately begin and accelerate street improvements, paid by establishing a dedicated one-half cent sales tax used exclusively for street improvements, with citizens' oversight and independent audits of expenditure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11557, "fingerprint": "2008|200800461|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800461|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6f39299472fce58c", "measure_id": "200800461", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high academic achievement for local students by maintaining small class sizes, updated textbooks and classroom materials, improved access to modern technology, science education, art, music, band programs, library services and school counselors to help students prepare for college and work, shall Martinez Unified School District authorize an annual school parcel tax of $50 per parcel for a term not to exceed five years, exempting eligible senior citizens, and including citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9507, "no_votes": 4155, "total_votes": 13662, "percent_yes": 69.58718, "percent_no": 30.412819999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.275316", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.190456", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.263744", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high academic achievement for local students by maintaining small class sizes, updated textbooks and classroom materials, improved access to modern technology, science education, art, music, band programs, library services and school counselors to help students prepare for college and work, shall Martinez Unified School District authorize an annual school parcel tax of $50 per parcel for a term not to exceed five years, exempting eligible senior citizens, and including citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6904, "fingerprint": "2008|200800019|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800019|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "33b0db473b78534f", "measure_id": "200800019", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the rate of the City of Richmond's Telecommunications Users' Tax from 10% to 9.5%, and to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Telecommunications and Video Users' Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16081, "no_votes": 5657, "total_votes": 21738, "percent_yes": 73.976445, "percent_no": 26.023555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.184648", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.260266", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the rate of the City of Richmond's Telecommunications Users' Tax from 10% to 9.5%, and to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Telecommunications and Video Users' Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11558, "fingerprint": "2008|200800462|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800462|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f87be15b836b11f0", "measure_id": "200800462", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To expand student access to technology and computers, college preparatory, honors and advanced placement classes, avoid increased class sizes, maintain essential programs and materials, keep classes small in the early grades, and attract and retain highly qualified teachers, shall the Pittsburg Unified School District levy an annual tax of $65 per taxable parcel for seven years, beginning July 1, 2009, with an annual inflation adjustment of $6, with citizen oversight and a senior citizen exemption?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11418, "no_votes": 4383, "total_votes": 15801, "percent_yes": 72.26125, "percent_no": 27.738749999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.275507", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.190731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.263929", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand student access to technology and computers, college preparatory, honors and advanced placement classes, avoid increased class sizes, maintain essential programs and materials, keep classes small in the early grades, and attract and retain highly qualified teachers, shall the Pittsburg Unified School District levy an annual tax of $65 per taxable parcel for seven years, beginning July 1, 2009, with an annual inflation adjustment of $6, with citizen oversight and a senior citizen exemption?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6906, "fingerprint": "2008|200800171|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800171|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "91a886f775d024f7", "measure_id": "200800171", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To address critical renovation and modernization needs at schools that have served Antioch for more than forty years, replace aging roofs, aging plumbing, old heating and air conditioning units with energy efficient systems, upgrade restrooms, electrical systems, renovate and expand libraries, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Antioch Unified School District issue $61,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with funds monitored by an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee and no funds spent on administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4948, "no_votes": 2973, "total_votes": 7921, "percent_yes": 62.46686, "percent_no": 37.53314, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.185262", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.260659", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address critical renovation and modernization needs at schools that have served Antioch for more than forty years, replace aging roofs, aging plumbing, old heating and air conditioning units with energy efficient systems, upgrade restrooms, electrical systems, renovate and expand libraries, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Antioch Unified School District issue $61,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with funds monitored by an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee and no funds spent on administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11559, "fingerprint": "2008|200800463|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800463|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "cd155bf3fd4ef50a", "measure_id": "200800463", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education, including reading, writing, math and science, retain quality teachers and counselors, support libraries, computer training and athletic programs, prepare students for college and the workforce, maintain reduced class sizes, maintain school cleanliness and protect against state budget cuts, shall the West County Unified School District renew it existing parcel tax for 5 years, keeping the current rate, with revenue staying at local schools, no funds to administrator salaries, an exemption for seniors and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63951, "no_votes": 16349, "total_votes": 80300, "percent_yes": 79.6401, "percent_no": 20.359899999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.275693", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.191007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.264108", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education, including reading, writing, math and science, retain quality teachers and counselors, support libraries, computer training and athletic programs, prepare students for college and the workforce, maintain reduced class sizes, maintain school cleanliness and protect against state budget cuts, shall the West County Unified School District renew it existing parcel tax for 5 years, keeping the current rate, with revenue staying at local schools, no funds to administrator salaries, an exemption for seniors and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6907, "fingerprint": "2008|200800172|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800172|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7e551e3d7980bebd", "measure_id": "200800172", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace its existing parcel tax, address the impact of state budget cuts, avoid increased class sizes, keep middle and high school libraries open, reduce class size in middle and high school science labs, algebra, calculus and math classes and maintain counseling, shall the San Ramon Valley Unified School District levy an annual tax of $166 per taxable parcel for seven years, beginning July 1, 2008, with an annual inflation adjustment limited to $8, annual audits and offering a senior exemption?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20675, "no_votes": 11875, "total_votes": 32550, "percent_yes": 63.51766599999999, "percent_no": 36.48233400000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.185540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.260854", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace its existing parcel tax, address the impact of state budget cuts, avoid increased class sizes, keep middle and high school libraries open, reduce class size in middle and high school science labs, algebra, calculus and math classes and maintain counseling, shall the San Ramon Valley Unified School District levy an annual tax of $166 per taxable parcel for seven years, beginning July 1, 2008, with an annual inflation adjustment limited to $8, annual audits and offering a senior exemption?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11555, "fingerprint": "2008|200800458|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800458|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "4a486ffc2c0c9703", "measure_id": "200800458", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To establish a ten-year technology fund, upgrade instructional classroom technology, replace worn, aging roofs, convert obsolete facilities into additional classroom space, upgrade electrical and energy management systems to improve efficiency and repair, construct, equip or upgrade school facilities, shall the Acalanes Union High School District issue $93 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with all expenditures reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39556, "no_votes": 21997, "total_votes": 61553, "percent_yes": 64.26332000000001, "percent_no": 35.73667999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.274751", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.189482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.263197", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To establish a ten-year technology fund, upgrade instructional classroom technology, replace worn, aging roofs, convert obsolete facilities into additional classroom space, upgrade electrical and energy management systems to improve efficiency and repair, construct, equip or upgrade school facilities, shall the Acalanes Union High School District issue $93 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with all expenditures reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6905, "fingerprint": "2008|200800135|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800135|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6470ad2077ce8f71", "measure_id": "200800135", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For the purposes of maintaining the existing hours and services at the Orinda Library, replacing worn and outdated books and materials, and ensuring that the Library can continue existing programs for children, families and seniors, shall the City of Orinda be authorized to continue and adjust the existing tax from twenty-seven dollars to thirty-nine dollars per year per residential parcel or equivalent unit, only for the Orinda Library and subject to an annual audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4455, "no_votes": 1555, "total_votes": 6010, "percent_yes": 74.12646000000001, "percent_no": 25.87353999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.184995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.260446", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the purposes of maintaining the existing hours and services at the Orinda Library, replacing worn and outdated books and materials, and ensuring that the Library can continue existing programs for children, families and seniors, shall the City of Orinda be authorized to continue and adjust the existing tax from twenty-seven dollars to thirty-nine dollars per year per residential parcel or equivalent unit, only for the Orinda Library and subject to an annual audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6909, "fingerprint": "2008|200800224|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800224|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7f38ed4f0060da83", "measure_id": "200800224", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2008-23, to provide additional funding for police protection services, be approved to authorize a special tax on property located in Zone 3006 of County Service Area P-6 in the unincorporated neighborhoods of East Richmond Heights and Bayo Vista (North Arlington area), at an initial annual amount of $108 per parcel for single-family, residential parcels, with higher amounts for properties in other use categories identified in the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 870, "no_votes": 1317, "total_votes": 2187, "percent_yes": 39.78052, "percent_no": 60.21948, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.186141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.261217", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2008-23, to provide additional funding for police protection services, be approved to authorize a special tax on property located in Zone 3006 of County Service Area P-6 in the unincorporated neighborhoods of East Richmond Heights and Bayo Vista (North Arlington area), at an initial annual amount of $108 per parcel for single-family, residential parcels, with higher amounts for properties in other use categories identified in the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6911, "fingerprint": "2008|200800314|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800314|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200800314", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23848, "no_votes": 17077, "total_votes": 40925, "percent_yes": 58.27245, "percent_no": 41.72755, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.186674", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.261576", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6912, "fingerprint": "2008|200800315|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800315|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f51dfb1c4ea2be78", "measure_id": "200800315", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To repair, renovate and make needed safety improvements to neighborhood parks, playgrounds, sporting fields, and the replacement of Rankin Pool; renovate and expand the Martinez Library with a designated children's area; provide youth recreational opportunities; and improve disabled access to parks and libraries, shall the City of Martinez issue $30 million in general obligation bonds, subject to citizen oversight and independent audits with no money to administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12247, "no_votes": 5516, "total_votes": 17763, "percent_yes": 68.94669, "percent_no": 31.053309999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.186939", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.261753", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, renovate and make needed safety improvements to neighborhood parks, playgrounds, sporting fields, and the replacement of Rankin Pool; renovate and expand the Martinez Library with a designated children's area; provide youth recreational opportunities; and improve disabled access to parks and libraries, shall the City of Martinez issue $30 million in general obligation bonds, subject to citizen oversight and independent audits with no money to administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6913, "fingerprint": "2008|200800316|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800316|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b584a021d170dc0f", "measure_id": "200800316", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance Expanding Open Space and Residential Land Use Designations and Adopting Development Agreement be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7691, "no_votes": 1219, "total_votes": 8910, "percent_yes": 86.318743, "percent_no": 13.681257000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.187205", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.261941", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance Expanding Open Space and Residential Land Use Designations and Adopting Development Agreement be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6914, "fingerprint": "2008|200800317|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800317|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "29d90fccc70e652a", "measure_id": "200800317", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance Expanding Open Space and Imposing Development Restrictions be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5037, "no_votes": 3964, "total_votes": 9001, "percent_yes": 55.960447, "percent_no": 44.039553, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.187468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.262122", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance Expanding Open Space and Imposing Development Restrictions be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6915, "fingerprint": "2008|200800318|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800318|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ba76b4cc4d7132df", "measure_id": "200800318", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Business License Tax Ordinance, Title 3 of Chapter 5 of the Oakley Municipal Code, be amended as set forth in Ordinance No. 14-08, altering the manner of calculating business license taxes that are used to provide general City services such as police, parks, recreation, code enforcement, library hours, youth activities, senior programs and street maintenance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5917, "no_votes": 4384, "total_votes": 10301, "percent_yes": 57.441026, "percent_no": 42.558974, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.187732", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.262299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Business License Tax Ordinance, Title 3 of Chapter 5 of the Oakley Municipal Code, be amended as set forth in Ordinance No. 14-08, altering the manner of calculating business license taxes that are used to provide general City services such as police, parks, recreation, code enforcement, library hours, youth activities, senior programs and street maintenance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6920, "fingerprint": "2008|200800460|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800460|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8727d1415cb0c262", "measure_id": "200800460", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the quality of local schools, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and maintain small class sizes, college/career/job preparation classes, art/music/foreign language programs, computers, infrastructure and instructional technology upgrades, elementary science specialists, and high school counselors, shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District extend its expiring parcel tax for five years at $11.50/month per parcel, with a senior citizen exemption, independent oversignt, no administrative salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Livermore children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84, "no_votes": 42, "total_votes": 126, "percent_yes": 66.66667, "percent_no": 33.333330000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.190127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.263564", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of local schools, attract and retain highly qualified teachers, and maintain small class sizes, college/career/job preparation classes, art/music/foreign language programs, computers, infrastructure and instructional technology upgrades, elementary science specialists, and high school counselors, shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District extend its expiring parcel tax for five years at $11.50/month per parcel, with a senior citizen exemption, independent oversignt, no administrative salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Livermore children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6916, "fingerprint": "2008|200800319|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800319|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "18f4c598d6fec3ab", "measure_id": "200800319", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to enact term limits upon members of the Pinole City Council, preventing any person who serves three (3) successive terms from serving again until an intervening period of two (2) years has elapsed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5585, "no_votes": 2084, "total_votes": 7669, "percent_yes": 72.825664, "percent_no": 27.174335999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.188072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.262477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to enact term limits upon members of the Pinole City Council, preventing any person who serves three (3) successive terms from serving again until an intervening period of two (2) years has elapsed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6918, "fingerprint": "2008|200800321|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800321|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "053b14745fa3864b", "measure_id": "200800321", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall so much of Article III of the City of San Ramon Charter which currently reads as \"Compensation for the elected Mayor of San Ramon shall be one hundred dollars per month more than a City Councilmember\" be amended to read \"Compensation for the elected Mayor of San Ramon shall be determined by resolution of the City Council.\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13041, "no_votes": 12350, "total_votes": 25391, "percent_yes": 51.36072, "percent_no": 48.63928, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.188715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.262836", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall so much of Article III of the City of San Ramon Charter which currently reads as \"Compensation for the elected Mayor of San Ramon shall be one hundred dollars per month more than a City Councilmember\" be amended to read \"Compensation for the elected Mayor of San Ramon shall be determined by resolution of the City Council.\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6919, "fingerprint": "2008|200800322|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800322|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "85dd22249e0d6a55", "measure_id": "200800322", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the following be added to Article III of the City of San Ramon Charter: Notwithstanding any of the above, if the general municipal election date is changed to the date of the statewide general election, the unexpired term of an incumbent Mayor shall be extended by one year or reduced by one year. If the term is extended, that individual may serve a total of nine years as Mayor.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12431, "no_votes": 12262, "total_votes": 24693, "percent_yes": 50.342200000000005, "percent_no": 49.657799999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.189098", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.263017", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the following be added to Article III of the City of San Ramon Charter: Notwithstanding any of the above, if the general municipal election date is changed to the date of the statewide general election, the unexpired term of an incumbent Mayor shall be extended by one year or reduced by one year. If the term is extended, that individual may serve a total of nine years as Mayor.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6908, "fingerprint": "2008|200800223|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800223|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "efc61c9f2f660e7c", "measure_id": "200800223", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit applicable to Crockett Community Services District be set at $2,851,000 for the Fiscal Year 2008-2009?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1190, "no_votes": 309, "total_votes": 1499, "percent_yes": 79.38626, "percent_no": 20.613740000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.185806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.261035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit applicable to Crockett Community Services District be set at $2,851,000 for the Fiscal Year 2008-2009?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6910, "fingerprint": "2008|200800225|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800225|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3d14bc1318c41ea2", "measure_id": "200800225", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Constitution Article XIIIB continue at $725,000.00 and be adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for Fiscal Year 2008-2009 through 2011-2012 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to DB L&L Zone #8 District for the stated fiscal years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2385, "no_votes": 921, "total_votes": 3306, "percent_yes": 72.14156, "percent_no": 27.85844, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.186407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.261395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Constitution Article XIIIB continue at $725,000.00 and be adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for Fiscal Year 2008-2009 through 2011-2012 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to DB L&L Zone #8 District for the stated fiscal years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6917, "fingerprint": "2008|200800320|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800320|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "56d603e5bd795587", "measure_id": "200800320", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Richmond Business License Act be adopted effective January 1, 2009, to define the category of Manufacturer and to establish a license fee equal to one fourth of one percent (0.25%) of the value of the material used in the manufacturing process during the immediately preceding calendar year for large manufacturers, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15473, "no_votes": 14563, "total_votes": 30036, "percent_yes": 51.514846000000006, "percent_no": 48.485153999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.188339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.262658", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Richmond Business License Act be adopted effective January 1, 2009, to define the category of Manufacturer and to establish a license fee equal to one fourth of one percent (0.25%) of the value of the material used in the manufacturing process during the immediately preceding calendar year for large manufacturers, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6921, "fingerprint": "2008|200800464|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800464|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "8b66cbe94ecc897b", "measure_id": "200800464", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, construct, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms and schools including replacing temporary portable classrooms with new classrooms; upgrading heating, air conditioning, plumbing and sewer systems; updating electrical systems to improve student access to computers; repairing and replacing roofs; and making health/safety improvements; shall Del Norte County Unified School District be authorized to issue $24,987,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5338, "no_votes": 3927, "total_votes": 9265, "percent_yes": 57.61467999999999, "percent_no": 42.38532000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.191274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.264292", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, construct, upgrade, and renovate outdated classrooms and schools including replacing temporary portable classrooms with new classrooms; upgrading heating, air conditioning, plumbing and sewer systems; updating electrical systems to improve student access to computers; repairing and replacing roofs; and making health/safety improvements; shall Del Norte County Unified School District be authorized to issue $24,987,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6923, "fingerprint": "2008|200800174|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800174|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "e9de1c59b8d3fa2a", "measure_id": "200800174", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe, secure local schools by replacing outdated portables, electrical, emergency and lighting systems, aging plumbing/restrooms; improving classrooms, technology and elementary school libraries; creating new career and technology education classrooms; upgrading physical education and athletic facilities; and qualifying for $11 Million Dollars in state matching funds, shall Lake Tahoe Unified School District issue $87 Million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2777, "no_votes": 2535, "total_votes": 5312, "percent_yes": 52.277863, "percent_no": 47.722137, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.191843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.264664", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe, secure local schools by replacing outdated portables, electrical, emergency and lighting systems, aging plumbing/restrooms; improving classrooms, technology and elementary school libraries; creating new career and technology education classrooms; upgrading physical education and athletic facilities; and qualifying for $11 Million Dollars in state matching funds, shall Lake Tahoe Unified School District issue $87 Million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6926, "fingerprint": "2008|200800465|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800465|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "48311c3de5f94723", "measure_id": "200800465", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, modernize, and improve school facilities, including improving access to computers and modern technology, replacing outdated heating, air conditioning, and plumbing systems, fixing leaking roofs, and improving handicapped access, shall Gold Oak Union School District be authorized to issue up to $8,950,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are spent on administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2326, "no_votes": 1823, "total_votes": 4149, "percent_yes": 56.0617, "percent_no": 43.9383, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.192717", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.265212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, modernize, and improve school facilities, including improving access to computers and modern technology, replacing outdated heating, air conditioning, and plumbing systems, fixing leaking roofs, and improving handicapped access, shall Gold Oak Union School District be authorized to issue up to $8,950,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are spent on administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6927, "fingerprint": "2008|200800466|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800466|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "7db95c89719c7099", "measure_id": "200800466", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health, safety and the quality of education at every school by repairing, updating, and constructing facilites; including furnishing equipment and technology; replacing outdated portables; electrical/plumbing/heating systems; and qualifying for $15.4 Million Dollars in state matching funds, shall Lake Tahoe Unified School District issue $64.5 Million in bonds at legal interest rate with citizen's oversight committee, annual financial audits, and funds only for school and classroom facility improvements, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6715, "no_votes": 4586, "total_votes": 11301, "percent_yes": 59.419520000000006, "percent_no": 40.580479999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.192985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.265393", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health, safety and the quality of education at every school by repairing, updating, and constructing facilites; including furnishing equipment and technology; replacing outdated portables; electrical/plumbing/heating systems; and qualifying for $15.4 Million Dollars in state matching funds, shall Lake Tahoe Unified School District issue $64.5 Million in bonds at legal interest rate with citizen's oversight committee, annual financial audits, and funds only for school and classroom facility improvements, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6924, "fingerprint": "2008|200800226|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800226|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "2c2227e26ee4f371", "measure_id": "200800226", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special tax be levied within the Cameron Estates Community Services District pursuant to Board Resolution No. 2007-04 for road improvements, upgrades, and maintenance according to the following schedule: A. Residential property: a maximum increase of $250.00 over the current assessment of $250.00 for a total amount of $500.00 per year residential parcel? B. Commercial property, described as parcels 109-111-14-100, 109-111-15-100, 109-111-16-100, 109-111-17-100, and 109-111-18-100: a maximum of $1,000,000 per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 285, "no_votes": 227, "total_votes": 512, "percent_yes": 55.664060000000006, "percent_no": 44.335939999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.192111", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.264849", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax be levied within the Cameron Estates Community Services District pursuant to Board Resolution No. 2007-04 for road improvements, upgrades, and maintenance according to the following schedule: A. Residential property: a maximum increase of $250.00 over the current assessment of $250.00 for a total amount of $500.00 per year residential parcel? B. Commercial property, described as parcels 109-111-14-100, 109-111-15-100, 109-111-16-100, 109-111-17-100, and 109-111-18-100: a maximum of $1,000,000 per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6928, "fingerprint": "2008|200800467|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800467|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a4cae4fa124b04cf", "measure_id": "200800467", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $475,000,000 million in bonds at the lowest available interest rates to improve student academic performance by building classrooms, facilities and labs throughout the district including for teaching green technologies; nursing and health care programs; architecture, engineering and construction management; computer sciences; early childhood development; and fire and police public safety programs at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College campuses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35171, "no_votes": 35313, "total_votes": 70484, "percent_yes": 49.899268, "percent_no": 50.100732, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.193250", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.265577", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $475,000,000 million in bonds at the lowest available interest rates to improve student academic performance by building classrooms, facilities and labs throughout the district including for teaching green technologies; nursing and health care programs; architecture, engineering and construction management; computer sciences; early childhood development; and fire and police public safety programs at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College campuses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6922, "fingerprint": "2008|200800173|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800173|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "8124022c088b6a69", "measure_id": "200800173", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and the quality of education at every school by repairing, updating, constructing, furnishing and equipping school facilities, including technology, job training, science and health facilities, roofs, electrical, plumbing and heating systems, and become eligible for millions in state matching funds, shall the El Dorado Union High School District issue $66,300,000 in bonds at legal rates? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee, conduct annual independent audits, and spend funds only on school and classroom improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19536, "no_votes": 15204, "total_votes": 34740, "percent_yes": 56.23489000000001, "percent_no": 43.76510999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.191567", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.264473", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and the quality of education at every school by repairing, updating, constructing, furnishing and equipping school facilities, including technology, job training, science and health facilities, roofs, electrical, plumbing and heating systems, and become eligible for millions in state matching funds, shall the El Dorado Union High School District issue $66,300,000 in bonds at legal rates? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee, conduct annual independent audits, and spend funds only on school and classroom improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6925, "fingerprint": "2008|200800227|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800227|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "b20ffbe9960b94e4", "measure_id": "200800227", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the voter-enacted Measure Y General Plan policies be extended ten years and amended to provide: (1) Traffic from major single-family residential subdivisions shall not result in, or worsen, Level of Service F (gridlock) traffic congestion; (2) No additional county roadways may operate at Level of Service F without voter approval or 4/5ths vote of County Supervisors; (3) Developer-paid traffic fees, combined with any other funding source, shall pay to build necessary road improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59835, "no_votes": 23497, "total_votes": 83332, "percent_yes": 71.803147, "percent_no": 28.196853000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.192389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.265029", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voter-enacted Measure Y General Plan policies be extended ten years and amended to provide: (1) Traffic from major single-family residential subdivisions shall not result in, or worsen, Level of Service F (gridlock) traffic congestion; (2) No additional county roadways may operate at Level of Service F without voter approval or 4/5ths vote of County Supervisors; (3) Developer-paid traffic fees, combined with any other funding source, shall pay to build necessary road improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11560, "fingerprint": "2008|200800324|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800324|FRESNO", "content_hash": "4055097ebf2cd05c", "measure_id": "200800324", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain and improve public safety services such as police and fire protection, street and pothole repair, parks, youth, after-school, anti-gang and anti-drug programs; senior and other other city services, shall the City of Kingsburg impose a Transient Occupancy Tax, also known as a hotel bed tax paid only by hotel guests, of 12%, 4% more than the current Transient Occupancy Tax of 8%, and continuing to be subject to publicly available annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3329, "no_votes": 1077, "total_votes": 4406, "percent_yes": 75.55606, "percent_no": 24.443939999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.279940", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.196370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.267703", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve public safety services such as police and fire protection, street and pothole repair, parks, youth, after-school, anti-gang and anti-drug programs; senior and other other city services, shall the City of Kingsburg impose a Transient Occupancy Tax, also known as a hotel bed tax paid only by hotel guests, of 12%, 4% more than the current Transient Occupancy Tax of 8%, and continuing to be subject to publicly available annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6932, "fingerprint": "2008|200800053|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800053|FRESNO", "content_hash": "5f8a1e7e0026c6fb", "measure_id": "200800053", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide facilities more comparable to neighboring school districts, renovate existing school facilities, and build new classrooms and educational facilities, shall the Caruthers Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $11,300,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, independent annual audits, and no money for salaries, administration, or school district overhead?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 683, "no_votes": 791, "total_votes": 1474, "percent_yes": 46.3365, "percent_no": 53.6635, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.194413", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.266302", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide facilities more comparable to neighboring school districts, renovate existing school facilities, and build new classrooms and educational facilities, shall the Caruthers Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $11,300,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, independent annual audits, and no money for salaries, administration, or school district overhead?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11562, "fingerprint": "2008|200800468|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800468|FRESNO", "content_hash": "29d24b33900058ce", "measure_id": "200800468", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace outdated heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems to improve energy efficiency; upgrade classroom computers and technology; replace aging portables, renovate restrooms, improve student safety and school security; acquire property; build classrooms and schools to reduce overcrowding; and qualify the District to receive an estimated $75,000,000 in State matching funds, shall the Central Unified School District issue $152,000,000 in bonds at lowest possible interest rates with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12062, "no_votes": 6961, "total_votes": 19023, "percent_yes": 63.407457, "percent_no": 36.592543, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.280503", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.197382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.268426", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace outdated heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems to improve energy efficiency; upgrade classroom computers and technology; replace aging portables, renovate restrooms, improve student safety and school security; acquire property; build classrooms and schools to reduce overcrowding; and qualify the District to receive an estimated $75,000,000 in State matching funds, shall the Central Unified School District issue $152,000,000 in bonds at lowest possible interest rates with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6933, "fingerprint": "2008|200800054|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800054|FRESNO", "content_hash": "750f523cd489ed77", "measure_id": "200800054", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, renovate and improve Caruthers Elementary School facilities, including building new classrooms and educational facilities, shall the Caruthers Unified School District K-8 School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue up to $2,800,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, independent annual audits, and no money for salaries, administration, or school district overhead?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 424, "no_votes": 511, "total_votes": 935, "percent_yes": 45.347592, "percent_no": 54.652408, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.194690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.266484", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, renovate and improve Caruthers Elementary School facilities, including building new classrooms and educational facilities, shall the Caruthers Unified School District K-8 School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue up to $2,800,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, independent annual audits, and no money for salaries, administration, or school district overhead?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6942, "fingerprint": "2008|200800471|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800471|FRESNO", "content_hash": "350ab85f239c0e17", "measure_id": "200800471", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; renovate and construct classrooms and educational facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for up to $50.0 million in State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (Coalinga Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $11.6 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2652, "no_votes": 1382, "total_votes": 4034, "percent_yes": 65.7412, "percent_no": 34.258799999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.198181", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.269113", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; renovate and construct classrooms and educational facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for up to $50.0 million in State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (Coalinga Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $11.6 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6929, "fingerprint": "2008|200800020|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800020|FRESNO", "content_hash": "8dbe389a3ee59d82", "measure_id": "200800020", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 721, changing the powers of the city manager by removing the City Manager's power to appoint the Chief of Police and vesting said power in the City Council, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 614, "no_votes": 1208, "total_votes": 1822, "percent_yes": 33.699232, "percent_no": 66.300768, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.193517", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.265760", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 721, changing the powers of the city manager by removing the City Manager's power to appoint the Chief of Police and vesting said power in the City Council, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11563, "fingerprint": "2008|200800472|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800472|FRESNO", "content_hash": "053b53494aaa429f", "measure_id": "200800472", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; construct and improve classrooms and educational facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for up to $70.6 million in State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 (Lemoore Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $31.0 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual financial audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 778, "no_votes": 549, "total_votes": 1327, "percent_yes": 58.62849, "percent_no": 41.37151, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.281255", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.198499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.269354", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; construct and improve classrooms and educational facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for up to $70.6 million in State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 (Lemoore Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $31.0 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual financial audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6934, "fingerprint": "2008|200800175|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800175|FRESNO", "content_hash": "48cf287fc46a6f8a", "measure_id": "200800175", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace outdated heating/ventilation/air conditioning systems to improve energy efficiency, upgrade classroom technology, replace aging portables, renovate restrooms, improve school security, acquire property, build classrooms and schools to avoid overcrowding, providing students access to comparable school facilities, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Central Unified School District issue $152 million in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits and independent citizens' oversight and no money for administrator's salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4092, "no_votes": 3377, "total_votes": 7469, "percent_yes": 54.78645, "percent_no": 45.21355, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.194956", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.266677", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace outdated heating/ventilation/air conditioning systems to improve energy efficiency, upgrade classroom technology, replace aging portables, renovate restrooms, improve school security, acquire property, build classrooms and schools to avoid overcrowding, providing students access to comparable school facilities, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Central Unified School District issue $152 million in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits and independent citizens' oversight and no money for administrator's salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6930, "fingerprint": "2008|200800021|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800021|FRESNO", "content_hash": "8cbb8e290155c63e", "measure_id": "200800021", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To reduce gang/drug related crimes by: hiring/training/retaining police officers; deploying special enforcement units to fight gang members/drug dealers; providing firefighters with enhanced emergency medical training/equipment; upgrading police/fire radios; shall the City of Reedley sales tax be increased by one half cent with citizens' oversight and independent annual financial audits of all expenditures as provided by Ordinance No. 2007-05?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3036, "no_votes": 1057, "total_votes": 4093, "percent_yes": 74.175423, "percent_no": 25.824577000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.193877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.265939", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce gang/drug related crimes by: hiring/training/retaining police officers; deploying special enforcement units to fight gang members/drug dealers; providing firefighters with enhanced emergency medical training/equipment; upgrading police/fire radios; shall the City of Reedley sales tax be increased by one half cent with citizens' oversight and independent annual financial audits of all expenditures as provided by Ordinance No. 2007-05?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6935, "fingerprint": "2008|200800176|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800176|FRESNO", "content_hash": "e030beff6d199352", "measure_id": "200800176", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and student support facilities, including a new elementary school to reduce overcrowding, vocational and technical education classrooms, and a multipurpose room at Liberty Intermediate School, shall Kerman Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $24,900,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are spent on administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 931, "no_votes": 516, "total_votes": 1447, "percent_yes": 64.340013, "percent_no": 35.659987, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.195299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.266858", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and student support facilities, including a new elementary school to reduce overcrowding, vocational and technical education classrooms, and a multipurpose room at Liberty Intermediate School, shall Kerman Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $24,900,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are spent on administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6937, "fingerprint": "2008|200800228|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800228|FRESNO", "content_hash": "c3794e2ad073b614", "measure_id": "200800228", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To add books, separate homework areas for children/youth, work with neighborhood schools to increase after school and job search programs, improve, upgrade, repair, and construct urban/rural Fresno County branch libraries; including disability access, fire safety, remove asbestos, improve energy efficiency and technology, shall Fresno County voters amend the one-eighth cent sales tax with a one-quarter cent sales tax for sixteen years with an independent public review of expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 163792, "no_votes": 94532, "total_votes": 258324, "percent_yes": 63.405645, "percent_no": 36.594355, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.195837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.267222", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To add books, separate homework areas for children/youth, work with neighborhood schools to increase after school and job search programs, improve, upgrade, repair, and construct urban/rural Fresno County branch libraries; including disability access, fire safety, remove asbestos, improve energy efficiency and technology, shall Fresno County voters amend the one-eighth cent sales tax with a one-quarter cent sales tax for sixteen years with an independent public review of expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6936, "fingerprint": "2008|200800177|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800177|FRESNO", "content_hash": "77e5b94a1e031f8c", "measure_id": "200800177", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, construct classrooms and a library; renovate existing classrooms and facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for state matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Northern Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $11,800,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 752, "no_votes": 335, "total_votes": 1087, "percent_yes": 69.181234, "percent_no": 30.818765999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.195571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.267038", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, construct classrooms and a library; renovate existing classrooms and facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for state matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Northern Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $11,800,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6939, "fingerprint": "2008|200800326|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800326|FRESNO", "content_hash": "533788e6ce246310", "measure_id": "200800326", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Selma increase the existing transient occupancy tax for the privilege of occupancy in any room, hotel, inn, tourist home, house, motel, or other lodging, for occupancy for a period less than 30 days from 6% to 10% of the rent charged by the operator of such lodging?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1850, "no_votes": 3318, "total_votes": 5168, "percent_yes": 35.797215, "percent_no": 64.202785, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.197061", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.268211", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Selma increase the existing transient occupancy tax for the privilege of occupancy in any room, hotel, inn, tourist home, house, motel, or other lodging, for occupancy for a period less than 30 days from 6% to 10% of the rent charged by the operator of such lodging?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11561, "fingerprint": "2008|200800325|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800325|FRESNO", "content_hash": "6a0873401e075a0d", "measure_id": "200800325", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To hire additional sworn officers including related training, equipment, vehicles, and for facilities expansion for the Parlier Police Department, and to raise additional funds to place paid Firefighters, and to expand the Parlier Fire Station, shall the City of Parlier be authorized to levy a parcel tax as set forth in Council resolution 2008-57 only for this purpose; subject to an annual audit.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1034, "no_votes": 714, "total_votes": 1748, "percent_yes": 59.15332, "percent_no": 40.84668, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.280129", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.196785", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.267992", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To hire additional sworn officers including related training, equipment, vehicles, and for facilities expansion for the Parlier Police Department, and to raise additional funds to place paid Firefighters, and to expand the Parlier Fire Station, shall the City of Parlier be authorized to levy a parcel tax as set forth in Council resolution 2008-57 only for this purpose; subject to an annual audit.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6931, "fingerprint": "2008|200800022|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800022|FRESNO", "content_hash": "0094fcb8941926f5", "measure_id": "200800022", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To recruit/hire/train additional police officers, firefighters, paramedics and 9-1-1 emergency dispatch workers; purchase a fire engine, ambulance, and other emergency equipment; maintain special anti-gang/anti-drug police units; increase neighborhood patrols; increase police presence at schools; shall the City of Sanger impose a three quarters of a cent sales tax with a citizens' oversight committee, annual independent audits, and require all funds to be used for public safety purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2674, "no_votes": 1072, "total_votes": 3746, "percent_yes": 71.38280999999999, "percent_no": 28.617190000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.194145", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.266118", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To recruit/hire/train additional police officers, firefighters, paramedics and 9-1-1 emergency dispatch workers; purchase a fire engine, ambulance, and other emergency equipment; maintain special anti-gang/anti-drug police units; increase neighborhood patrols; increase police presence at schools; shall the City of Sanger impose a three quarters of a cent sales tax with a citizens' oversight committee, annual independent audits, and require all funds to be used for public safety purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6938, "fingerprint": "2008|200800323|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800323|FRESNO", "content_hash": "01c34cbbeb8a9601", "measure_id": "200800323", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Kerman establish a Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) at the rate of 8 percent for the users of motels, hotels and similar temporary lodgings in the City to pay as part of their room rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1340, "no_votes": 1339, "total_votes": 2679, "percent_yes": 50.01866, "percent_no": 49.98134, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.196102", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.267405", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Kerman establish a Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) at the rate of 8 percent for the users of motels, hotels and similar temporary lodgings in the City to pay as part of their room rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6940, "fingerprint": "2008|200800469|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800469|FRESNO", "content_hash": "ce117b553b0fa607", "measure_id": "200800469", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood elementary and middle schools, upgrade classroom computer technology and school pick-up/drop-off zones, bring playgrounds into compliance with safety requirements, upgrade plumbing, wiring, heating and ventilation systems, improve energy efficiency, increase classroom funding by paying down debt, shall Sierra Unified School District issue $12,000,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip schools, sites, facilities, with independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2698, "no_votes": 2852, "total_votes": 5550, "percent_yes": 48.612612, "percent_no": 51.387388, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.197651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.268646", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood elementary and middle schools, upgrade classroom computer technology and school pick-up/drop-off zones, bring playgrounds into compliance with safety requirements, upgrade plumbing, wiring, heating and ventilation systems, improve energy efficiency, increase classroom funding by paying down debt, shall Sierra Unified School District issue $12,000,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip schools, sites, facilities, with independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6941, "fingerprint": "2008|200800470|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800470|FRESNO", "content_hash": "ab388c9e18f893f6", "measure_id": "200800470", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide a quality education and attract excellent teachers, upgrade electrical systems, classroom computer technology and science labs, improve job training and vocational educational classrooms, improve energy efficiency to reduce utility costs, shall Sierra Unified School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip high school classrooms, sites, facilities, with independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2836, "no_votes": 2724, "total_votes": 5560, "percent_yes": 51.007193, "percent_no": 48.992807, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.197916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.268879", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a quality education and attract excellent teachers, upgrade electrical systems, classroom computer technology and science labs, improve job training and vocational educational classrooms, improve energy efficiency to reduce utility costs, shall Sierra Unified School District issue $10,000,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip high school classrooms, sites, facilities, with independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6943, "fingerprint": "2008|200800055|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800055|GLENN", "content_hash": "73ba13d1bcd2c232", "measure_id": "200800055", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and modernize all schools including replacing leaky roofs, repairing deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems, upgrading inadequate electrical systems to improve access to computers and modern technology, making health and safety improvements, building new classrooms, libraries, cafeterias, and making the District eligible for millions of dollars in State-matching grants, shall the Orland Joint Unified School District issue $21,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2093, "no_votes": 1617, "total_votes": 3710, "percent_yes": 56.41509, "percent_no": 43.58491, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.198767", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.269586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and modernize all schools including replacing leaky roofs, repairing deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems, upgrading inadequate electrical systems to improve access to computers and modern technology, making health and safety improvements, building new classrooms, libraries, cafeterias, and making the District eligible for millions of dollars in State-matching grants, shall the Orland Joint Unified School District issue $21,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6944, "fingerprint": "2008|200800178|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800178|GLENN", "content_hash": "830a1158bd838979", "measure_id": "200800178", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct and improve school facilities, including replacing portable facilities with permanent classrooms, improving student access to computers and modern technology, and replacing heating and air conditioning systems to improve energy efficiency and reduce operating costs, shall the Willows Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $20,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits and no money for salaries, administration or operations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1129, "no_votes": 1163, "total_votes": 2292, "percent_yes": 49.25829, "percent_no": 50.74171, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.199088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.269828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct and improve school facilities, including replacing portable facilities with permanent classrooms, improving student access to computers and modern technology, and replacing heating and air conditioning systems to improve energy efficiency and reduce operating costs, shall the Willows Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $20,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits and no money for salaries, administration or operations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6945, "fingerprint": "2008|200800473|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800473|GLENN", "content_hash": "c8dfea7b2e797bec", "measure_id": "200800473", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall a unified school district be formed between Hamilton Union High School District and the Hamilton Union Elementary School District excluding the school district of Capay?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 560, "no_votes": 311, "total_votes": 871, "percent_yes": 64.293915, "percent_no": 35.706085, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.199358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.270216", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a unified school district be formed between Hamilton Union High School District and the Hamilton Union Elementary School District excluding the school district of Capay?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6946, "fingerprint": "2008|200800474|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800474|GLENN", "content_hash": "6d7ecb3b0241d446", "measure_id": "200800474", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and modernize ALL schools including replacing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; upgrading inadequate electrical systems; replacing temporary portables with permanent classrooms; repairing or replacing leaky roofs; making health and safety improvements; repairing deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; and qualifying the District for $4,200,000 in State matching grants, shall Willows Unified School District issue $20,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1701, "no_votes": 1739, "total_votes": 3440, "percent_yes": 49.447674, "percent_no": 50.552326, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.199628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.270452", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and modernize ALL schools including replacing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; upgrading inadequate electrical systems; replacing temporary portables with permanent classrooms; repairing or replacing leaky roofs; making health and safety improvements; repairing deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; and qualifying the District for $4,200,000 in State matching grants, shall Willows Unified School District issue $20,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6948, "fingerprint": "2008|200800023|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800023|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "b7218e425bc48ffa", "measure_id": "200800023", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arcata continue to impose a three percent (3%) Utility Users Tax (Resolution No. 078-21) on the use of utility services in the City, including gas, electric, water, wastewater, and communications services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2556, "no_votes": 1693, "total_votes": 4249, "percent_yes": 60.15532999999999, "percent_no": 39.84467000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.200160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.270907", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arcata continue to impose a three percent (3%) Utility Users Tax (Resolution No. 078-21) on the use of utility services in the City, including gas, electric, water, wastewater, and communications services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6947, "fingerprint": "2008|200800003|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800003|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "eff103eca27d014c", "measure_id": "200800003", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Whether Manila residents want fluoride added to their water by Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District (HBMWD) if HBMWD decides to implement fluoridation of water, with the prorated cost for Manila to be borne by Manila Community Services District ratepayers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60, "no_votes": 164, "total_votes": 224, "percent_yes": 26.785713, "percent_no": 73.214287, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.199894", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.270691", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Whether Manila residents want fluoride added to their water by Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District (HBMWD) if HBMWD decides to implement fluoridation of water, with the prorated cost for Manila to be borne by Manila Community Services District ratepayers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6949, "fingerprint": "2008|200800179|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800179|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "05919e338107b950", "measure_id": "200800179", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and replace aging roofs, repair structures to meet current fire and safety codes, replace outdated electrical, plumbing, restrooms, and heating systems; upgrade classroom technology and computer labs, repair classroom facilities, and modernize science classrooms and labs, shall the McKinleyville Union School District be authorized to replace, renovate, acquire and construct school facilities, issue $14,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries, and appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1723, "no_votes": 1385, "total_votes": 3108, "percent_yes": 55.43758, "percent_no": 44.56242, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.200428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.271104", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and replace aging roofs, repair structures to meet current fire and safety codes, replace outdated electrical, plumbing, restrooms, and heating systems; upgrade classroom technology and computer labs, repair classroom facilities, and modernize science classrooms and labs, shall the McKinleyville Union School District be authorized to replace, renovate, acquire and construct school facilities, issue $14,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries, and appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6952, "fingerprint": "2008|200800329|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800329|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "9536d1fb04992558", "measure_id": "200800329", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to add a one quarter of one percent (0.25%) transaction and use tax to fund essential services such as police, fire, street maintenance, environmental programs, and parks and recreation? Should the tax be approved by voters the existing three percent (3%) utility user tax would be repealed.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5985, "no_votes": 4572, "total_votes": 10557, "percent_yes": 56.692240000000005, "percent_no": 43.307759999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.201289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.271891", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to add a one quarter of one percent (0.25%) transaction and use tax to fund essential services such as police, fire, street maintenance, environmental programs, and parks and recreation? Should the tax be approved by voters the existing three percent (3%) utility user tax would be repealed.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6953, "fingerprint": "2008|200800330|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800330|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ec3f23b1f99ba647", "measure_id": "200800330", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to increase the currently assessed nine percent (9%) Transient Occupancy Tax to ten percent (10%) to fund essential services such as police, fire, street maintenance, environmental programs, and parks and recreation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6681, "no_votes": 3947, "total_votes": 10628, "percent_yes": 62.862253, "percent_no": 37.137747, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.201555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.272095", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to increase the currently assessed nine percent (9%) Transient Occupancy Tax to ten percent (10%) to fund essential services such as police, fire, street maintenance, environmental programs, and parks and recreation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6950, "fingerprint": "2008|200800327|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800327|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "e4e90aebc9097c64", "measure_id": "200800327", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arcata enact the proposed ordinance entitled: An Ordinance to Prohibit the Military Recruitment of Any Person under the Age of Eighteen?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6690, "no_votes": 2505, "total_votes": 9195, "percent_yes": 72.756934, "percent_no": 27.243066, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.200752", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.271301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arcata enact the proposed ordinance entitled: An Ordinance to Prohibit the Military Recruitment of Any Person under the Age of Eighteen?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6951, "fingerprint": "2008|200800328|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800328|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "5ebb525d0b01c901", "measure_id": "200800328", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arcata enact a three-quarter cent sales tax for general governmental purposes, such as: Filling potholes, maintaining, and repairing city streets; Increasing police staffing to improve downtown, Plaza, city forest, and park safety; Improving pedestrian and bicycle safety; Enhancing community and neighborhood safety; Providing safer sidewalks, pathways to schools, bicycle lanes, and wheelchair access, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee to ensure fiscal accountability and conduct annual audits of all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5684, "no_votes": 3264, "total_votes": 8948, "percent_yes": 63.52258, "percent_no": 36.47742, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.201023", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.271491", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arcata enact a three-quarter cent sales tax for general governmental purposes, such as: Filling potholes, maintaining, and repairing city streets; Increasing police staffing to improve downtown, Plaza, city forest, and park safety; Improving pedestrian and bicycle safety; Enhancing community and neighborhood safety; Providing safer sidewalks, pathways to schools, bicycle lanes, and wheelchair access, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee to ensure fiscal accountability and conduct annual audits of all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6956, "fingerprint": "2008|200800475|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800475|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "b1e36687464b2063", "measure_id": "200800475", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, construct school facilities, modernize and renovate outdated classrooms and restrooms; replace heating ventilation and air conditioning systems; improve student access to computers and technology; repair and replace roofs; upgrade electrical, plumbing, and sewer systems; make health and safety improvements; and qualify the District for $4,100,000 in State grants, shall the Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified School District issue $5,950,000 in bonds, requiring an independent oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no more money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1170, "no_votes": 489, "total_votes": 1659, "percent_yes": 70.52441, "percent_no": 29.475589999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.202347", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.272669", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, construct school facilities, modernize and renovate outdated classrooms and restrooms; replace heating ventilation and air conditioning systems; improve student access to computers and technology; repair and replace roofs; upgrade electrical, plumbing, and sewer systems; make health and safety improvements; and qualify the District for $4,100,000 in State grants, shall the Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified School District issue $5,950,000 in bonds, requiring an independent oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no more money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6955, "fingerprint": "2008|200800332|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800332|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "5667b5138a4503d7", "measure_id": "200800332", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a 3/4 cent increase in the transaction and use tax in the City of Trinidad be approved for four years, starting April 1, 2009?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117, "no_votes": 107, "total_votes": 224, "percent_yes": 52.23214, "percent_no": 47.76786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.202082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.272482", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a 3/4 cent increase in the transaction and use tax in the City of Trinidad be approved for four years, starting April 1, 2009?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6954, "fingerprint": "2008|200800331|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800331|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "2d72226f0279b0e4", "measure_id": "200800331", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance to prohibit the military recruitment of any person under the age of eighteen be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6251, "no_votes": 4799, "total_votes": 11050, "percent_yes": 56.570137, "percent_no": 43.429863, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.201822", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.272284", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance to prohibit the military recruitment of any person under the age of eighteen be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6958, "fingerprint": "2008|200800056|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800056|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "e2fd2ccc2c99059f", "measure_id": "200800056", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities for students and provide modern teaching and learning environments, shall McCabe Union Elementary School District construct a gymnasium, athletic facilities and supporting education facilities by issuing $7,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with an appointed citizen's oversight committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 520, "no_votes": 470, "total_votes": 990, "percent_yes": 52.52525, "percent_no": 47.47475, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.202932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.273038", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities for students and provide modern teaching and learning environments, shall McCabe Union Elementary School District construct a gymnasium, athletic facilities and supporting education facilities by issuing $7,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with an appointed citizen's oversight committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6959, "fingerprint": "2008|200800180|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800180|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "e2fd2ccc2c99059f", "measure_id": "200800180", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities for students and provide modern teaching and learning environments, shall McCabe Union Elementary School District construct a gymnasium, athletic facilities and supporting education facilities by issuing $7,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with an appointed citizen's oversight committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 495, "no_votes": 478, "total_votes": 973, "percent_yes": 50.87359, "percent_no": 49.12641, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.203197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.273223", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities for students and provide modern teaching and learning environments, shall McCabe Union Elementary School District construct a gymnasium, athletic facilities and supporting education facilities by issuing $7,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with an appointed citizen's oversight committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6961, "fingerprint": "2008|200800333|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800333|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "acf36be755f697d8", "measure_id": "200800333", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To Support and Save Holtville's Police Department, shall the City of Holtville be authorized to increase the Utility User Tax by four percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 760, "no_votes": 543, "total_votes": 1303, "percent_yes": 58.326936, "percent_no": 41.673064, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.203806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.273591", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To Support and Save Holtville's Police Department, shall the City of Holtville be authorized to increase the Utility User Tax by four percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6960, "fingerprint": "2008|200800229|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800229|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "5c61ad5290935621", "measure_id": "200800229", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To repair potholes and maintain local streets and roads, reduce traffic congestion, improve County roads and highways, reduce air pollution, improve 9-1-1 response times, expand elderly and disabled transit, qualify for matching state and federal funds, provide citizen oversight and annual audits, shall Imperial County Local Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 1- 2008 be adopted, which will continue, but not increase, the existing half-cent sales tax for 40-years, per the locally adopted Expenditure Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28523, "no_votes": 5516, "total_votes": 34039, "percent_yes": 83.79505999999999, "percent_no": 16.204940000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.203479", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.273402", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair potholes and maintain local streets and roads, reduce traffic congestion, improve County roads and highways, reduce air pollution, improve 9-1-1 response times, expand elderly and disabled transit, qualify for matching state and federal funds, provide citizen oversight and annual audits, shall Imperial County Local Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 1- 2008 be adopted, which will continue, but not increase, the existing half-cent sales tax for 40-years, per the locally adopted Expenditure Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6957, "fingerprint": "2008|200800004|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800004|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "a024579ef27b0cc7", "measure_id": "200800004", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance to make unlawful the importation of sewage sludge and prohibit Imperial County agencies or governmental bodies from authorizing disposal of imported sewer sludge within the jurisdictional boundaries of Imperial County be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13826, "no_votes": 6239, "total_votes": 20065, "percent_yes": 68.906057, "percent_no": 31.093942999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.202665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.272853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to make unlawful the importation of sewage sludge and prohibit Imperial County agencies or governmental bodies from authorizing disposal of imported sewer sludge within the jurisdictional boundaries of Imperial County be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6962, "fingerprint": "2008|200800476|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800476|INYO", "content_hash": "58e75cc52a738b4e", "measure_id": "200800476", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, and improve Bishop elementary school facilities, including providing renewable energy improvements and funding major repairs so more money can be used in the classroom shall the Bishop Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $3,000,000 in bonds at interest rates not to exceed 12% with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3740, "no_votes": 1635, "total_votes": 5375, "percent_yes": 69.581395, "percent_no": 30.418605, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.204081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.273772", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, and improve Bishop elementary school facilities, including providing renewable energy improvements and funding major repairs so more money can be used in the classroom shall the Bishop Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $3,000,000 in bonds at interest rates not to exceed 12% with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6963, "fingerprint": "2008|200800057|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800057|KERN", "content_hash": "0be78a6ed81053d2", "measure_id": "200800057", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide the children in California City with schools comparable to other communities, complete construction of California City High School and Hacienda Elementary School, and construct, acquire and improve school facilities in California City, shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue $24,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual independent audits, and funds spent only on school and classroom improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1746, "no_votes": 1047, "total_votes": 2793, "percent_yes": 62.51343, "percent_no": 37.48657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.204347", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.273964", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the children in California City with schools comparable to other communities, complete construction of California City High School and Hacienda Elementary School, and construct, acquire and improve school facilities in California City, shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue $24,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual independent audits, and funds spent only on school and classroom improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6964, "fingerprint": "2008|200800058|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800058|KERN", "content_hash": "b0e6c3b5bdeac76c", "measure_id": "200800058", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the health, safety and education of our children by modernizing aging school facilities, minimizing lead and asbestos hazards, replacing unsafe or inadequate electrical, communications, fire alarm systems, heating and cooling systems, repairing plumbing and renovating restrooms, renovating and/or adding classrooms and other facilities, shall Rio Bravo-Greeley Union Elementary School District issue $10.9 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight to ensure expenditures are only for school improvements, with all money raised benefitting local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 957, "no_votes": 415, "total_votes": 1372, "percent_yes": 69.75218699999999, "percent_no": 30.247813000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.204734", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.274147", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the health, safety and education of our children by modernizing aging school facilities, minimizing lead and asbestos hazards, replacing unsafe or inadequate electrical, communications, fire alarm systems, heating and cooling systems, repairing plumbing and renovating restrooms, renovating and/or adding classrooms and other facilities, shall Rio Bravo-Greeley Union Elementary School District issue $10.9 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight to ensure expenditures are only for school improvements, with all money raised benefitting local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6967, "fingerprint": "2008|200800182|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800182|KERN", "content_hash": "66fb3c69f447339d", "measure_id": "200800182", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and equip classrooms and school facilities, upgrade plumbing, electrical, heating, ventilation systems, build new classrooms and school facilities to relieve overcrowding, repair roofs, make health and safety improvements, upgrade computer and instructional technology, and qualify the District for $12,200,000 in State-matching grants, shall Wasco Union High School District issue $33,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1070, "no_votes": 570, "total_votes": 1640, "percent_yes": 65.2439, "percent_no": 34.7561, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.205611", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.274716", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and equip classrooms and school facilities, upgrade plumbing, electrical, heating, ventilation systems, build new classrooms and school facilities to relieve overcrowding, repair roofs, make health and safety improvements, upgrade computer and instructional technology, and qualify the District for $12,200,000 in State-matching grants, shall Wasco Union High School District issue $33,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6966, "fingerprint": "2008|200800181|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800181|KERN", "content_hash": "ff6a998884088ddf", "measure_id": "200800181", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct and improve local classrooms and support facilities, including replacing outdated portables, building restrooms, updating technology, building a gym for school and community use, improving handicapped access, and providing the local match for approximately $4.4 million in State funds, shall the Kernville Union School District be authorized to issue up to $6,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO monies for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1778, "no_votes": 1282, "total_votes": 3060, "percent_yes": 58.104575, "percent_no": 41.895425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.205279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.274524", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct and improve local classrooms and support facilities, including replacing outdated portables, building restrooms, updating technology, building a gym for school and community use, improving handicapped access, and providing the local match for approximately $4.4 million in State funds, shall the Kernville Union School District be authorized to issue up to $6,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO monies for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6965, "fingerprint": "2008|200800136|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800136|KERN", "content_hash": "0d3a325472b654d3", "measure_id": "200800136", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a utility users tax to fund general city services, including essential services such as police and fire protection, animal control, building inspection and plan checks, planning, public works and other administrative services, and road maintenance and repair?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 127, "no_votes": 391, "total_votes": 518, "percent_yes": 24.517375, "percent_no": 75.482625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.205013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.274336", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a utility users tax to fund general city services, including essential services such as police and fire protection, animal control, building inspection and plan checks, planning, public works and other administrative services, and road maintenance and repair?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6971, "fingerprint": "2008|200800478|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800478|KERN", "content_hash": "212751a39b20bcfb", "measure_id": "200800478", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities in Mojave, including improving fire alarm and plumbing systems, and improving access to modern technology at Mojave Elementary, and improving vocational education facilities at Mojave High, shall the Mojave Unified School District be authorized to issue $14,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 804, "no_votes": 341, "total_votes": 1145, "percent_yes": 70.21834, "percent_no": 29.781660000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.206733", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.275456", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities in Mojave, including improving fire alarm and plumbing systems, and improving access to modern technology at Mojave Elementary, and improving vocational education facilities at Mojave High, shall the Mojave Unified School District be authorized to issue $14,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6973, "fingerprint": "2008|200800480|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800480|KERN", "content_hash": "3322dd3725d51007", "measure_id": "200800480", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide excellent schools for all local students, shall the Southern Kern Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, including classrooms to reduce student overcrowding, replacing portables with permanent classrooms, adding libraries, science and computer labs, improving school safety, and becoming eligible for additional state funding by issuing $24,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4089, "no_votes": 1918, "total_votes": 6007, "percent_yes": 68.070585, "percent_no": 31.929415000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.207384", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.275823", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide excellent schools for all local students, shall the Southern Kern Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, including classrooms to reduce student overcrowding, replacing portables with permanent classrooms, adding libraries, science and computer labs, improving school safety, and becoming eligible for additional state funding by issuing $24,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6970, "fingerprint": "2008|200800477|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800477|KERN", "content_hash": "9e9d950a5a35e633", "measure_id": "200800477", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the local quality of education, student learning and safety in neighborhood schools, shall Lakeside Union School District upgrade classroom computers, technology, science space, and equipment, improve school safety/security, repair/replace deteriorated roofs, plumbing, lighting, electrical and building systems, and replace the existing special tax, by issuing $22,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with mandatory audits, independent citizens' oversight, no administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting Lakeside and Suburu School communities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2179, "no_votes": 656, "total_votes": 2835, "percent_yes": 76.86067, "percent_no": 23.13933, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.206443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.275274", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the local quality of education, student learning and safety in neighborhood schools, shall Lakeside Union School District upgrade classroom computers, technology, science space, and equipment, improve school safety/security, repair/replace deteriorated roofs, plumbing, lighting, electrical and building systems, and replace the existing special tax, by issuing $22,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with mandatory audits, independent citizens' oversight, no administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting Lakeside and Suburu School communities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6972, "fingerprint": "2008|200800479|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800479|KERN", "content_hash": "e334d112b85dd399", "measure_id": "200800479", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities, increase safety in our schools and qualify for State matching funds; shall the Richland School District issue $23 million in bonds, providing for a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, interest rates below legal limits, and no money for salaries or school operating expenses, in order to renovate existing school buildings, update technology, purchase land and construct a new elementary school, with all money raised benefiting our local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2469, "no_votes": 994, "total_votes": 3463, "percent_yes": 71.29656, "percent_no": 28.70344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.206999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.275641", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities, increase safety in our schools and qualify for State matching funds; shall the Richland School District issue $23 million in bonds, providing for a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, interest rates below legal limits, and no money for salaries or school operating expenses, in order to renovate existing school buildings, update technology, purchase land and construct a new elementary school, with all money raised benefiting our local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6968, "fingerprint": "2008|200800334|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800334|KERN", "content_hash": "5c2a760ca36672ce", "measure_id": "200800334", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve public safety and prevent cuts to essential City services by expanding school gang/drug prevention programs; hiring additional police, including school officers; reducing 9-1-1 response times; repairing storm drains to prevent flooding; removing more graffiti/trash/litter; repairing potholes/streets; maintaining parks, youth recreation, and other general city services; should the city sales tax be increased by one cent requiring annual financial audits and public review of expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1498, "no_votes": 595, "total_votes": 2093, "percent_yes": 71.571904, "percent_no": 28.428095999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.205908", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.274907", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve public safety and prevent cuts to essential City services by expanding school gang/drug prevention programs; hiring additional police, including school officers; reducing 9-1-1 response times; repairing storm drains to prevent flooding; removing more graffiti/trash/litter; repairing potholes/streets; maintaining parks, youth recreation, and other general city services; should the city sales tax be increased by one cent requiring annual financial audits and public review of expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6969, "fingerprint": "2008|200800335|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800335|KERN", "content_hash": "72cba67e3bc5617e", "measure_id": "200800335", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved that adopts a special transactions and use tax to pay for specific street improvements at the rate of three quarters of a percent (3/4%) of the retail sales price, to be administered by the California State Board of Equilization, to terminate 10 years following activation, and to include an Ad Hoc Citizens Advisory Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6421, "no_votes": 4801, "total_votes": 11222, "percent_yes": 57.21797, "percent_no": 42.78203, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.206175", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.275092", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved that adopts a special transactions and use tax to pay for specific street improvements at the rate of three quarters of a percent (3/4%) of the retail sales price, to be administered by the California State Board of Equilization, to terminate 10 years following activation, and to include an Ad Hoc Citizens Advisory Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6975, "fingerprint": "2008|200800482|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800482|KINGS", "content_hash": "6bf2ededc6320186", "measure_id": "200800482", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; construct and improve classrooms and educational facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for up to $70.6 million in State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 (Leemore Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $31.0 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual financial audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6734, "no_votes": 3702, "total_votes": 10436, "percent_yes": 64.52664, "percent_no": 35.47336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.207942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.276188", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; construct and improve classrooms and educational facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for up to $70.6 million in State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 (Leemore Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $31.0 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual financial audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6974, "fingerprint": "2008|200800481|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800481|KINGS", "content_hash": "9a72e300027a3324", "measure_id": "200800481", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a permanent Tulare College Center, including buildings for welding/farming equipment repair classes/vocational education, qualify for $98 million in State building grants, construct classrooms, library, computer labs, an agricultural education complex, livestock pavilion, including farm animal buildings and labs, upgrade/construct/equip/acquire classrooms, facilities/sites; shall College of the Sequoias Tulare Improvement District No. 3 of the College of the Sequoias Community College District issue $60 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and all funds staying in the Tulare area for college facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1734, "no_votes": 1077, "total_votes": 2811, "percent_yes": 61.68623, "percent_no": 38.31377, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.207651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.276005", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a permanent Tulare College Center, including buildings for welding/farming equipment repair classes/vocational education, qualify for $98 million in State building grants, construct classrooms, library, computer labs, an agricultural education complex, livestock pavilion, including farm animal buildings and labs, upgrade/construct/equip/acquire classrooms, facilities/sites; shall College of the Sequoias Tulare Improvement District No. 3 of the College of the Sequoias Community College District issue $60 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and all funds staying in the Tulare area for college facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6976, "fingerprint": "2008|200800116|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800116|LAKE", "content_hash": "97a68f72ccbd7637", "measure_id": "200800116", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special annual tax of $45.00 per-year-per-single-lot be imposed on all the single lots within the Butler-Keys Community Services District for a period of four (4) years commencing in the 2008/2009 fiscal year for the purpose of maintaining the streets within the Butler-Keys Community Services District and shall the District establish an annual appropriations limit in the amount of $10,911.32 which shall also be effective for the four (4) fiscal years following the appropriation of this measure by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 40, "percent_yes": 77.5, "percent_no": 22.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.208236", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.276370", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special annual tax of $45.00 per-year-per-single-lot be imposed on all the single lots within the Butler-Keys Community Services District for a period of four (4) years commencing in the 2008/2009 fiscal year for the purpose of maintaining the streets within the Butler-Keys Community Services District and shall the District establish an annual appropriations limit in the amount of $10,911.32 which shall also be effective for the four (4) fiscal years following the appropriation of this measure by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6977, "fingerprint": "2008|200800230|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800230|LASSEN", "content_hash": "c0ecd4d4b32e83fa", "measure_id": "200800230", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the proposed Honey Lake Valley Community Swimming Pool County Service Area be authorized to adopt a special tax not to exceed $25 per annum on each inhabitable dwelling unit on each parcel of real property within the proposed Honey Lake Valley Community Swimming Pool County Service Area to be effective and collected with Lassen County general property taxes beginning in the fiscal year 2009-2010 with the proceeds from such taxes to be used to support the operation of 1) a community swimming pool to be constructed on land owned by the Lassen Union High School District, or 2) a comparable pool project of the same size, scope, and scale by another entity; and shall the appropriations limit of the proposed Honey Lake Valley Community Swimming Pool County Service Area required by Article 13B of the California Constitution be established at $250,000? The Board of Supervisors sitting as the governing body of the county services area shall have the discretion to levy the special tax at a lower rate.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4625, "no_votes": 4154, "total_votes": 8779, "percent_yes": 52.682537, "percent_no": 47.317463, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.208504", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.276557", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed Honey Lake Valley Community Swimming Pool County Service Area be authorized to adopt a special tax not to exceed $25 per annum on each inhabitable dwelling unit on each parcel of real property within the proposed Honey Lake Valley Community Swimming Pool County Service Area to be effective and collected with Lassen County general property taxes beginning in the fiscal year 2009-2010 with the proceeds from such taxes to be used to support the operation of 1) a community swimming pool to be constructed on land owned by the Lassen Union High School District, or 2) a comparable pool project of the same size, scope, and scale by another entity; and shall the appropriations limit of the proposed Honey Lake Valley Community Swimming Pool County Service Area required by Article 13B of the California Constitution be established at $250,000? The Board of Supervisors sitting as the governing body of the county services area shall have the discretion to levy the special tax at a lower rate.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 6978, "fingerprint": "2008|200800483|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800483|LASSEN", "content_hash": "0afe29179ad96f11", "measure_id": "200800483", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, reconstruct, repair, replace, acquire, construct and make improvements to school buildings and facilities, and meet fire, health, and safety standards to improve health, safety and education for students, shall the Susanville Elementary School District issue a maximum of $9,000,000 in bonds, with interest rates within legal limits, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries or other routine school operating expenses with all money raised benefitting local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3025, "no_votes": 1527, "total_votes": 4552, "percent_yes": 66.45430300000001, "percent_no": 33.54569699999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.208769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.276741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, reconstruct, repair, replace, acquire, construct and make improvements to school buildings and facilities, and meet fire, health, and safety standards to improve health, safety and education for students, shall the Susanville Elementary School District issue a maximum of $9,000,000 in bonds, with interest rates within legal limits, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries or other routine school operating expenses with all money raised benefitting local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11589, "fingerprint": "2008|200800592|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800592|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4bb63313b193e60d", "measure_id": "200800592", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall FELIPE AGUIRRE be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 969, "no_votes": 1233, "total_votes": 2202, "percent_yes": 44.00545, "percent_no": 55.99455, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-12-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.302647", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.231462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.291764", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall FELIPE AGUIRRE be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11588, "fingerprint": "2008|200800591|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800591|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "be2925f2968c268c", "measure_id": "200800591", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall VERONICA GUARDADO be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 936, "no_votes": 1220, "total_votes": 2156, "percent_yes": 43.413728, "percent_no": 56.586272, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-12-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.302463", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.231199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.291585", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall VERONICA GUARDADO be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11587, "fingerprint": "2008|200800590|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800590|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "010bfb88fbd2ccb1", "measure_id": "200800590", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ANA ROSA RIZO be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 925, "no_votes": 1228, "total_votes": 2153, "percent_yes": 42.963308, "percent_no": 57.036692, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-12-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.302277", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.230934", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.291403", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ANA ROSA RIZO be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11574, "fingerprint": "2008|200800338|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800338|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a205f17ff5ff97ae", "measure_id": "200800338", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Tina Baca Del Rio be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1897, "no_votes": 1862, "total_votes": 3759, "percent_yes": 50.46555, "percent_no": 49.53445, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.293654", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.217321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.282347", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Tina Baca Del Rio be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6997, "fingerprint": "2008|200800337|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800337|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "03252d0c2bcf3b7c", "measure_id": "200800337", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Robert Fierro be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1798, "no_votes": 1816, "total_votes": 3614, "percent_yes": 49.75097, "percent_no": 50.24903, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.217059", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.282164", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Robert Fierro be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7020, "fingerprint": "2008|200800495|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800495|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cc7d34792be47021", "measure_id": "200800495", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Bill Eisen Be Recalled As Member of the Board of Trustees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12765, "no_votes": 4979, "total_votes": 17744, "percent_yes": 71.93981000000001, "percent_no": 28.06018999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.226986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.288983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Bill Eisen Be Recalled As Member of the Board of Trustees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11577, "fingerprint": "2008|200800345|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800345|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a269edb2c5b0688b", "measure_id": "200800345", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address gang violence through prevention and job training programs; preventing students from dropping out of school; funding supervised after-school programs, tutoring/mentoring, vocational/apprenticeship programs, expanded graffiti removal; requiring Controller audits, citizen oversight; funding proven programs; shall the City of Los Angeles levy an annual $36 gang prevention tax, with discounts for low-income seniors, on each real property parcel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 712039, "no_votes": 362396, "total_votes": 1074435, "percent_yes": 66.27102000000001, "percent_no": 33.72897999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.295014", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.219279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.283919", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address gang violence through prevention and job training programs; preventing students from dropping out of school; funding supervised after-school programs, tutoring/mentoring, vocational/apprenticeship programs, expanded graffiti removal; requiring Controller audits, citizen oversight; funding proven programs; shall the City of Los Angeles levy an annual $36 gang prevention tax, with discounts for low-income seniors, on each real property parcel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11571, "fingerprint": "2008|200800183|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800183|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d82a7fe8869f2440", "measure_id": "200800183", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain qualified teachers; reduce class size; maintain libraries; upgrade computer and science labs; improve academics including music, arts, math, science, English, and other courses students need to qualify for college admission; and improve school safety/security; shall the Centinela Valley Union High School District levy an education parcel tax at $.04 per square foot for nine years, exempting seniors, with no money used for administrative costs and an independent citizen?s oversight committee to audit use of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5248, "no_votes": 4051, "total_votes": 9299, "percent_yes": 56.436175, "percent_no": 43.563825, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.292531", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.215621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.281210", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain qualified teachers; reduce class size; maintain libraries; upgrade computer and science labs; improve academics including music, arts, math, science, English, and other courses students need to qualify for college admission; and improve school safety/security; shall the Centinela Valley Union High School District levy an education parcel tax at $.04 per square foot for nine years, exempting seniors, with no money used for administrative costs and an independent citizen?s oversight committee to audit use of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11566, "fingerprint": "2008|200800107|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800107|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f376d37c7fc80a08", "measure_id": "200800107", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Lawndale be authorized to build a new community center to house after-school youth programs; senior programs; increase opportunities for recreational, arts and cultural programs; and provide space for community meetings, special events, staffing and other community purposes; by spending more than one million dollars of City funds with no increase in City taxes and subject to citizens' oversight and annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 811, "no_votes": 259, "total_votes": 1070, "percent_yes": 75.79439, "percent_no": 24.205609999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.290842", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.213043", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.279548", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Lawndale be authorized to build a new community center to house after-school youth programs; senior programs; increase opportunities for recreational, arts and cultural programs; and provide space for community meetings, special events, staffing and other community purposes; by spending more than one million dollars of City funds with no increase in City taxes and subject to citizens' oversight and annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11564, "fingerprint": "2008|200800105|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800105|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fd6b5faa1a2a2560", "measure_id": "200800105", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Lancaster adopt an ordinance providing for the consolidation of the Lancaster General Municipal Election with the countywide school district election to be held in November of odd numbered years commencing November 2009?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6173, "no_votes": 2293, "total_votes": 8466, "percent_yes": 72.91519, "percent_no": 27.084810000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.290442", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.212504", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.279182", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Lancaster adopt an ordinance providing for the consolidation of the Lancaster General Municipal Election with the countywide school district election to be held in November of odd numbered years commencing November 2009?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6987, "fingerprint": "2008|200800062|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800062|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6baf9249fb357c2b", "measure_id": "200800062", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide a quality education for all students, meet the challenges of new instructional techniques with contemporary computer technology and to provide all students with a safe learning environment, shall San Gabriel Unified School District issue $65,000,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, subject to independent financial audits, citizen oversight and with no money for administrators? salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5240, "no_votes": 2235, "total_votes": 7475, "percent_yes": 70.10034, "percent_no": 29.899659999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.211367", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.278441", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a quality education for all students, meet the challenges of new instructional techniques with contemporary computer technology and to provide all students with a safe learning environment, shall San Gabriel Unified School District issue $65,000,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, subject to independent financial audits, citizen oversight and with no money for administrators? salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7026, "fingerprint": "2008|200800501|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800501|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "62f81d3607c3c02d", "measure_id": "200800501", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve job and career training, provide for modernization and safety, and increase educational opportunities, shall Santa Monica Community College District issue $295 million in bonds at legal rates to improve student teaching/career training in science, nursing, technology, media, and emerging high-tech fields; construct/equip/modernize math and science laboratories; replace deteriorating buildings; upgrade fire, seismic safety; achieve energy savings; with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual performance/financial audits, with no funds for administration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30232, "no_votes": 18953, "total_votes": 49185, "percent_yes": 61.465895, "percent_no": 38.534105, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.228881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.290105", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve job and career training, provide for modernization and safety, and increase educational opportunities, shall Santa Monica Community College District issue $295 million in bonds at legal rates to improve student teaching/career training in science, nursing, technology, media, and emerging high-tech fields; construct/equip/modernize math and science laboratories; replace deteriorating buildings; upgrade fire, seismic safety; achieve energy savings; with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual performance/financial audits, with no funds for administration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7014, "fingerprint": "2008|200800487|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800487|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3496ac983da8359e", "measure_id": "200800487", "measure_letter": "AB", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide a healthy learning environment, improve student health and safety, shall Bonita Unified School District issue $83,560,000 in bonds at legal rates to construct, improve, equip schools, technology, water and electrical, utilities, HVAC and solar energy systems, multipurpose classrooms, grounds, fields and facilities, including upgrading gyms, equipment, and non-compliant tracks, and completing necessary upgrades to athletic facilities, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrators? salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17218, "no_votes": 11090, "total_votes": 28308, "percent_yes": 60.82379999999999, "percent_no": 39.17620000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.224650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.287479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a healthy learning environment, improve student health and safety, shall Bonita Unified School District issue $83,560,000 in bonds at legal rates to construct, improve, equip schools, technology, water and electrical, utilities, HVAC and solar energy systems, multipurpose classrooms, grounds, fields and facilities, including upgrading gyms, equipment, and non-compliant tracks, and completing necessary upgrades to athletic facilities, with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrators? salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11578, "fingerprint": "2008|200800346|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800346|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b1c6d61b68123c73", "measure_id": "200800346", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall existing voter-approved authorization for low rent housing be revised to remove impediments to federal and state funding and requirements not compatible with current housing needs, and authorize the development, construction or acquisition of low rent housing by public entities in the City of Los Angeles, maintaining the previously authorized voter-approved level of 3,500 units per Council District, subject to availability of funding and all City development requirements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 616711, "no_votes": 411626, "total_votes": 1028337, "percent_yes": 59.971684, "percent_no": 40.028316, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.295201", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.219563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.284257", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall existing voter-approved authorization for low rent housing be revised to remove impediments to federal and state funding and requirements not compatible with current housing needs, and authorize the development, construction or acquisition of low rent housing by public entities in the City of Los Angeles, maintaining the previously authorized voter-approved level of 3,500 units per Council District, subject to availability of funding and all City development requirements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11565, "fingerprint": "2008|200800106|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800106|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "154ea41ea97b547f", "measure_id": "200800106", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Lancaster adopt an ordinance providing for the consolidation of the Lancaster General Municipal Election with the countywide school district election to be held in November of odd numbered years commencing November 2011?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2867, "no_votes": 2722, "total_votes": 5589, "percent_yes": 51.297194000000005, "percent_no": 48.702805999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.290631", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.212776", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.279362", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Lancaster adopt an ordinance providing for the consolidation of the Lancaster General Municipal Election with the countywide school district election to be held in November of odd numbered years commencing November 2011?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6980, "fingerprint": "2008|200800025|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800025|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "46fb3f061a80f3bb", "measure_id": "200800025", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 814-NS be adopted to reduce the rate of the City of Huntington Park\u2019s Communications Users\u2019 Tax from 7% to 6.5% and maintain a flow of tax revenues to fund essential city services; to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Communications Users\u2019 Tax (currently called the Telephone Users\u2019 Tax) to reflect technological advances and changes in federal law; and to ratify and approve the past collection of the Tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4804, "no_votes": 1334, "total_votes": 6138, "percent_yes": 78.26653999999999, "percent_no": 21.733460000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.209367", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.277112", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 814-NS be adopted to reduce the rate of the City of Huntington Park\u2019s Communications Users\u2019 Tax from 7% to 6.5% and maintain a flow of tax revenues to fund essential city services; to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Communications Users\u2019 Tax (currently called the Telephone Users\u2019 Tax) to reflect technological advances and changes in federal law; and to ratify and approve the past collection of the Tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7021, "fingerprint": "2008|200800496|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800496|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3ba4f48e07852290", "measure_id": "200800496", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain quality teachers, improve instruction, and ensure college and career readiness for local students, shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District rehabilitate 58- year old Mira Costa High School including replacing deteriorated classrooms with new classrooms and science labs, upgrading technology, replacing deteriorated plumbing/restrooms, and improving safety/energy-efficiency, by issuing $67,480,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local to improve Manhattan Beach schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12191, "no_votes": 7610, "total_votes": 19801, "percent_yes": 61.5676, "percent_no": 38.4324, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.227249", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.289164", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain quality teachers, improve instruction, and ensure college and career readiness for local students, shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District rehabilitate 58- year old Mira Costa High School including replacing deteriorated classrooms with new classrooms and science labs, upgrading technology, replacing deteriorated plumbing/restrooms, and improving safety/energy-efficiency, by issuing $67,480,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds staying local to improve Manhattan Beach schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11579, "fingerprint": "2008|200800347|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800347|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cea1882134e1bf9d", "measure_id": "200800347", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a term limits ordinance be adopted in the City of Lynwood so that no member of the city council may serve more than two consecutive terms in office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9663, "no_votes": 3305, "total_votes": 12968, "percent_yes": 74.51418600000001, "percent_no": 25.48581399999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.295389", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.219837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.284452", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a term limits ordinance be adopted in the City of Lynwood so that no member of the city council may serve more than two consecutive terms in office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11569, "fingerprint": "2008|200800137|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800137|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "791083cc58f1b3b2", "measure_id": "200800137", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Covina extend for only 10 years its existing 6% Utility Users Tax, with no rate increase, requiring annual financial audits, and ensuring all funds collected remain in Covina, to continue funding vital city services including: police, fire and paramedic services; street and lighting maintenance; and services for senior citizens, the library, and parks and recreation programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3745, "no_votes": 2005, "total_votes": 5750, "percent_yes": 65.130436, "percent_no": 34.869564, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.291967", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.214700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.280643", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Covina extend for only 10 years its existing 6% Utility Users Tax, with no rate increase, requiring annual financial audits, and ensuring all funds collected remain in Covina, to continue funding vital city services including: police, fire and paramedic services; street and lighting maintenance; and services for senior citizens, the library, and parks and recreation programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6986, "fingerprint": "2008|200800061|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800061|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2d50ea977d8602d2", "measure_id": "200800061", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, complete the renovation of local schools, make health and safety improvements, upgrade and modernize existing classrooms and school buildings, including multipurpose rooms, and improve student support facilities at the High School, including the library, computer and science labs and athletic facilities, shall the Redondo Beach Unified School District issue $145,000,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with no money for teacher or administrative salaries, and spending reviewed annually by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13516, "no_votes": 6989, "total_votes": 20505, "percent_yes": 65.91563000000001, "percent_no": 34.08436999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.211071", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.278250", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, complete the renovation of local schools, make health and safety improvements, upgrade and modernize existing classrooms and school buildings, including multipurpose rooms, and improve student support facilities at the High School, including the library, computer and science labs and athletic facilities, shall the Redondo Beach Unified School District issue $145,000,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with no money for teacher or administrative salaries, and spending reviewed annually by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7008, "fingerprint": "2008|200800355|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800355|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "adb1d0d40e84e7d6", "measure_id": "200800355", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed City Charter of the City of Rosemead be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3845, "no_votes": 6399, "total_votes": 10244, "percent_yes": 37.534165, "percent_no": 62.465835, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.222376", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.285956", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed City Charter of the City of Rosemead be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7012, "fingerprint": "2008|200800484|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800484|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a1f3da8f3520494c", "measure_id": "200800484", "measure_letter": "CF", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct and improve high school facilities, shall the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District be authorized to replace portables with permanent high school classrooms and facilities, construct additional classrooms, including science labs, and qualify for approximately $9,500,000 in State matching funds by issuing up to $13,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3486, "no_votes": 2766, "total_votes": 6252, "percent_yes": 55.75816, "percent_no": 44.24184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.223826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.286904", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct and improve high school facilities, shall the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District be authorized to replace portables with permanent high school classrooms and facilities, construct additional classrooms, including science labs, and qualify for approximately $9,500,000 in State matching funds by issuing up to $13,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7015, "fingerprint": "2008|200800488|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800488|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "25a739522287a2f9", "measure_id": "200800488", "measure_letter": "CV", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education/student safety/reduce overcrowding, shall Centinela Valley Union High School District issue $98,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, to repair/acquire/construct local schools, sites, facilities, libraries, classrooms, science/computer labs, ensure earthquake safety, remove mold/asbestos, upgrade fire safety/security systems, leaky roofs, restrooms, plumbing/electrical/heating/cooling systems, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent annual audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and no increase in current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27255, "no_votes": 11253, "total_votes": 38508, "percent_yes": 70.7775, "percent_no": 29.222499999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.224991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.287664", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education/student safety/reduce overcrowding, shall Centinela Valley Union High School District issue $98,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, to repair/acquire/construct local schools, sites, facilities, libraries, classrooms, science/computer labs, ensure earthquake safety, remove mold/asbestos, upgrade fire safety/security systems, leaky roofs, restrooms, plumbing/electrical/heating/cooling systems, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent annual audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and no increase in current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11583, "fingerprint": "2008|200800490|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800490|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3008b3a6f1b246c3", "measure_id": "200800490", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure safe high school campuses and better prepare local students for college and high demand jobs, shall El Monte Union High School District rehabilitate, acquire, construct, and equip classrooms, sites, and facilities, complete safety/energy-efficiency upgrades, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, upgrade technology and add new science labs, by issuing $148,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with independent oversight, no money for staff salaries, and all funds benefiting local high schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24851, "no_votes": 8659, "total_votes": 33510, "percent_yes": 74.15995, "percent_no": 25.840050000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.298918", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.225527", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.288035", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure safe high school campuses and better prepare local students for college and high demand jobs, shall El Monte Union High School District rehabilitate, acquire, construct, and equip classrooms, sites, and facilities, complete safety/energy-efficiency upgrades, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, upgrade technology and add new science labs, by issuing $148,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with independent oversight, no money for staff salaries, and all funds benefiting local high schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11567, "fingerprint": "2008|200800108|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800108|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e57c17cbcac4165e", "measure_id": "200800108", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that 1) reduces the tax rate from 5% to 4.5%, 2) adds modern communication technologies to the activities taxed, 3) preserves the local telephone tax against changes in federal law, and 4) retains the existing exemptions for seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1657, "no_votes": 961, "total_votes": 2618, "percent_yes": 63.292587, "percent_no": 36.707413, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.291029", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.213316", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.279730", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that 1) reduces the tax rate from 5% to 4.5%, 2) adds modern communication technologies to the activities taxed, 3) preserves the local telephone tax against changes in federal law, and 4) retains the existing exemptions for seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6983, "fingerprint": "2008|200800028|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800028|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fcbae95f8225d0d1", "measure_id": "200800028", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to ratify and continue Pasadena\u2019s existing Utility Users Tax to fund general city services, including essential municipal services such as police, fire, street repair, parks and libraries, provided that low-income seniors and disabled residents remain exempt, the ordinance is updated to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used, and independent annual audits of the tax are required?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21375, "no_votes": 15219, "total_votes": 36594, "percent_yes": 58.41121700000001, "percent_no": 41.58878299999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.210174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.277686", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to ratify and continue Pasadena\u2019s existing Utility Users Tax to fund general city services, including essential municipal services such as police, fire, street repair, parks and libraries, provided that low-income seniors and disabled residents remain exempt, the ordinance is updated to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used, and independent annual audits of the tax are required?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7006, "fingerprint": "2008|200800353|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800353|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "826a0ba22aad1296", "measure_id": "200800353", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an Initiative to amend the Redondo Beach City Charter by adding Article XXVII to require voter approval of specified changes in allowable land use be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17412, "no_votes": 12241, "total_votes": 29653, "percent_yes": 58.71919, "percent_no": 41.28081, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.221800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.285588", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an Initiative to amend the Redondo Beach City Charter by adding Article XXVII to require voter approval of specified changes in allowable land use be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11582, "fingerprint": "2008|200800486|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800486|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f4ce5c68a5f6aa47", "measure_id": "200800486", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe and modernized school facilities, make necessary structural seismic safety repairs, upgrade, repair, and reconstruct aging classrooms, infrastructure, multiuse, gyms, libraries, science, technology & labs; roofing, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; renovate Beverly Hills Unified School District schools to better protect student/staff from unauthorized entry, security risks and natural disasters; shall Beverly Hills Unified School District issue $334 million in bonds at legal interest rates subject to mandatory audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight without an estimated increase in tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9484, "no_votes": 5132, "total_votes": 14616, "percent_yes": 64.88779, "percent_no": 35.112210000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.298174", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.224379", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.287288", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe and modernized school facilities, make necessary structural seismic safety repairs, upgrade, repair, and reconstruct aging classrooms, infrastructure, multiuse, gyms, libraries, science, technology & labs; roofing, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; renovate Beverly Hills Unified School District schools to better protect student/staff from unauthorized entry, security risks and natural disasters; shall Beverly Hills Unified School District issue $334 million in bonds at legal interest rates subject to mandatory audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight without an estimated increase in tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11572, "fingerprint": "2008|200800185|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800185|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4d1c9ad457de136d", "measure_id": "200800185", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high quality education for Hermosa\u2019s schools, support classroom instruction, maintain and create small class sizes, and preserve educational programs, shall Hermosa Beach City School District levy a parcel tax for Two Hundred Fifty-Seven Dollars ($257) per assessor parcel per year, not to exceed a 5% annual increase, for five (5) years, with exemptions available for seniors and disabled persons, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, accountability measures and all funds being used locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1858, "no_votes": 2093, "total_votes": 3951, "percent_yes": 47.026068, "percent_no": 52.973932, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.292908", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.216233", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.281594", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high quality education for Hermosa\u2019s schools, support classroom instruction, maintain and create small class sizes, and preserve educational programs, shall Hermosa Beach City School District levy a parcel tax for Two Hundred Fifty-Seven Dollars ($257) per assessor parcel per year, not to exceed a 5% annual increase, for five (5) years, with exemptions available for seniors and disabled persons, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, accountability measures and all funds being used locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11568, "fingerprint": "2008|200800109|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800109|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "06436bd836bf8153", "measure_id": "200800109", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Malibu City Council adopt an ordinance that would require the removal or trimming of landscaping in order to restore and maintain primary views from private homes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1624, "no_votes": 1068, "total_votes": 2692, "percent_yes": 60.32689, "percent_no": 39.67311, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.291218", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.213584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.279911", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Malibu City Council adopt an ordinance that would require the removal or trimming of landscaping in order to restore and maintain primary views from private homes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6985, "fingerprint": "2008|200800060|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800060|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e5b85844dbb72429", "measure_id": "200800060", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify for State matching funds that will better prepare Long Beach college students for high demand jobs, shall Long Beach Community College District renovate science, nursing, police, and firefighting classrooms, upgrade classroom technology and high-tech training labs; repair aging roofs, electrical, plumbing, heating, and ventilation; and upgrade/construct/equip/acquire classrooms, facilities, sites; by issuing $440 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and all funds staying local to improve Long Beach City College facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 79204, "no_votes": 28057, "total_votes": 107261, "percent_yes": 73.84231, "percent_no": 26.157690000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.210775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.278068", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify for State matching funds that will better prepare Long Beach college students for high demand jobs, shall Long Beach Community College District renovate science, nursing, police, and firefighting classrooms, upgrade classroom technology and high-tech training labs; repair aging roofs, electrical, plumbing, heating, and ventilation; and upgrade/construct/equip/acquire classrooms, facilities, sites; by issuing $440 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and all funds staying local to improve Long Beach City College facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7007, "fingerprint": "2008|200800354|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800354|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9231179f5561fb00", "measure_id": "200800354", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended by adding Article XXVII to require voter approval before any of the following changes in allowable land use or development standards could be made: rezoning of single family residential zones; rezoning of low density multi-family residential zones to any higher density residential zone; rezoning of park or open space; or any zoning amendment that would increase the height limit on buildings in the Coastal Zone?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14528, "no_votes": 14042, "total_votes": 28570, "percent_yes": 50.85054, "percent_no": 49.14946, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.222103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.285768", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended by adding Article XXVII to require voter approval before any of the following changes in allowable land use or development standards could be made: rezoning of single family residential zones; rezoning of low density multi-family residential zones to any higher density residential zone; rezoning of park or open space; or any zoning amendment that would increase the height limit on buildings in the Coastal Zone?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6981, "fingerprint": "2008|200800026|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800026|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fd9c68919bd4b2ec", "measure_id": "200800026", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 08-02 be adopted to prohibit the sale and use of fireworks in the City of Inglewood?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9772, "no_votes": 13339, "total_votes": 23111, "percent_yes": 42.282894, "percent_no": 57.717106, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.209636", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.277310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 08-02 be adopted to prohibit the sale and use of fireworks in the City of Inglewood?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11576, "fingerprint": "2008|200800343|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800343|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c71d795dd7ced7ca", "measure_id": "200800343", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without raising current tax rates, shall an ordinance be adopted to help preserve funding for critical City services, including police and fire protection, paramedic and emergency response, street maintenance, parks, youth services, and libraries, by updating the telephone users tax to include new and evolving technologies so that all taxpayers are treated equally regardless of technology used?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84503, "no_votes": 56521, "total_votes": 141024, "percent_yes": 59.92101, "percent_no": 40.07899, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.294587", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.218738", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.283281", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without raising current tax rates, shall an ordinance be adopted to help preserve funding for critical City services, including police and fire protection, paramedic and emergency response, street maintenance, parks, youth services, and libraries, by updating the telephone users tax to include new and evolving technologies so that all taxpayers are treated equally regardless of technology used?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6979, "fingerprint": "2008|200800024|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800024|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e917058dfdddcbcb", "measure_id": "200800024", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a Charter Amendment, proposed by the Downey City Council, which amends Charter Section 500.1 Limitation of Terms from a two (2) term limit to a three (3) consecutive term limit and provides for additional terms after a two (2) year waiting period, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6977, "no_votes": 14192, "total_votes": 21169, "percent_yes": 32.958569999999995, "percent_no": 67.04143, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.209066", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.276927", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Charter Amendment, proposed by the Downey City Council, which amends Charter Section 500.1 Limitation of Terms from a two (2) term limit to a three (3) consecutive term limit and provides for additional terms after a two (2) year waiting period, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6998, "fingerprint": "2008|200800339|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800339|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0adc07b8e6dd9057", "measure_id": "200800339", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve and maintain funding for essential city services, including fire and other emergency response services, pothole repair, street and storm drain maintenance, graffiti removal, on-duty police staffing, street lighting, park maintenance, emergency reserves maintenance and other general city services, shall an ordinance establishing a temporary transactions (sales) and use tax of one-half of one percent (\u00bd%) for a period of five years be adopted.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13393, "no_votes": 5374, "total_votes": 18767, "percent_yes": 71.36462999999999, "percent_no": 28.63537000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.217592", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.282528", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve and maintain funding for essential city services, including fire and other emergency response services, pothole repair, street and storm drain maintenance, graffiti removal, on-duty police staffing, street lighting, park maintenance, emergency reserves maintenance and other general city services, shall an ordinance establishing a temporary transactions (sales) and use tax of one-half of one percent (\u00bd%) for a period of five years be adopted.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11573, "fingerprint": "2008|200800336|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800336|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "eb11b8319150301f", "measure_id": "200800336", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 08-R-12601, entitled \u201cResolution of the Council of the City of Beverly Hills amending the General Plan to enable the revitalization of the Beverly Hilton Hotel site with a new Luxury Hotel, Condominiums, and Open Space,\u201d be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7972, "no_votes": 7843, "total_votes": 15815, "percent_yes": 50.40784000000001, "percent_no": 49.59215999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.293284", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.216793", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.281976", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 08-R-12601, entitled \u201cResolution of the Council of the City of Beverly Hills amending the General Plan to enable the revitalization of the Beverly Hilton Hotel site with a new Luxury Hotel, Condominiums, and Open Space,\u201d be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6995, "fingerprint": "2008|200800184|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800184|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2c06c529f8f25560", "measure_id": "200800184", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Hawthorne School District be authorized to issue $20,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates to acquire, construct, and improve local schools, including security improvements throughout the District to reduce vandalism, additional classrooms and athletic fields at the charter high school, and gymnasiums for student and community use, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for salaries, administration, and overhead?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2481, "no_votes": 1528, "total_votes": 4009, "percent_yes": 61.885756, "percent_no": 38.114244, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.215934", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.281395", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Hawthorne School District be authorized to issue $20,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates to acquire, construct, and improve local schools, including security improvements throughout the District to reduce vandalism, additional classrooms and athletic fields at the charter high school, and gymnasiums for student and community use, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for salaries, administration, and overhead?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7002, "fingerprint": "2008|200800348|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800348|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b97fa64b5eb71887", "measure_id": "200800348", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Lynwood City Council make its top priority for use of Utility User\u2019s Tax revenue law enforcement, gang suppression, crime and drug intervention, graffiti abatement, and prosecution of those engaged in prostitution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7790, "no_votes": 5252, "total_votes": 13042, "percent_yes": 59.7301, "percent_no": 40.2699, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.220110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.284644", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Lynwood City Council make its top priority for use of Utility User\u2019s Tax revenue law enforcement, gang suppression, crime and drug intervention, graffiti abatement, and prosecution of those engaged in prostitution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7001, "fingerprint": "2008|200800344|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800344|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4881332f46b2c776", "measure_id": "200800344", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To repay bonds which the City intends to issue to repair/replace city streets, sidewalks, alleys, storm drains, fire stations, police stations, libraries and recreational facilities and to acquire, restore and preserve wetlands, shall an Ordinance be adopted which establishes an annual parcel tax of $120 per residential unit (0.4 to 8.8 cents per square foot for other uses) adjusted annually for inflation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75821, "no_votes": 67619, "total_votes": 143440, "percent_yes": 52.85904, "percent_no": 47.14096, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.219013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.283466", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repay bonds which the City intends to issue to repair/replace city streets, sidewalks, alleys, storm drains, fire stations, police stations, libraries and recreational facilities and to acquire, restore and preserve wetlands, shall an Ordinance be adopted which establishes an annual parcel tax of $120 per residential unit (0.4 to 8.8 cents per square foot for other uses) adjusted annually for inflation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7003, "fingerprint": "2008|200800349|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800349|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "88a5b7e89c7d21d6", "measure_id": "200800349", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve the safety and character of the City of Lynwood through general City services such as law enforcement, fire protection, street repair, park maintenance, and recreational services, shall the city?s utility user?s tax be reduced to nine percent, ratified, and updated based on changes in technology and laws since it was instituted in 1990; provided that exemptions for senior citizens and disabled person shall also remain?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8211, "no_votes": 4353, "total_votes": 12564, "percent_yes": 65.353394, "percent_no": 34.646606000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.220380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.284852", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve the safety and character of the City of Lynwood through general City services such as law enforcement, fire protection, street repair, park maintenance, and recreational services, shall the city?s utility user?s tax be reduced to nine percent, ratified, and updated based on changes in technology and laws since it was instituted in 1990; provided that exemptions for senior citizens and disabled person shall also remain?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7018, "fingerprint": "2008|200800493|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800493|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fed1746bdbcb47fe", "measure_id": "200800493", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs by improving classrooms, laboratories, equipment; train nurses, police, firefighters, paramedics; increase apprenticeship training opportunities; repair electrical wiring, plumbing, fire alarms; improve earthquake safety, energy efficiency to reduce costs; acquire/improve real property; shall Los Angeles Community College District issue $3.5 billion in bonds at legal interest rates, requiring public review, oversight, audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and no tax rate increase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1057738, "no_votes": 450949, "total_votes": 1508687, "percent_yes": 70.10984, "percent_no": 29.890159999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.226438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.288600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs by improving classrooms, laboratories, equipment; train nurses, police, firefighters, paramedics; increase apprenticeship training opportunities; repair electrical wiring, plumbing, fire alarms; improve earthquake safety, energy efficiency to reduce costs; acquire/improve real property; shall Los Angeles Community College District issue $3.5 billion in bonds at legal interest rates, requiring public review, oversight, audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and no tax rate increase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7028, "fingerprint": "2008|200800504|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800504|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1f21bdec7f299600", "measure_id": "200800504", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education, prepare students for well-paying jobs and university transfer and qualify for State matching funds, shall Victor Valley Community College District improve classrooms, labs and educational buildings and establish a Workforce Training Center and Public Safety Academy for nursing, healthcare, emergency medical, police, firefighting and business careers, upgrade aging infrastructure, acquire sites, equipment, construct/repair buildings/science labs, by issuing $297,500,000 million in bonds, at legal rates with independent citizens\u2019 oversight/no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49, "no_votes": 37, "total_votes": 86, "percent_yes": 56.97674000000001, "percent_no": 43.02325999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.229831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.290663", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education, prepare students for well-paying jobs and university transfer and qualify for State matching funds, shall Victor Valley Community College District improve classrooms, labs and educational buildings and establish a Workforce Training Center and Public Safety Academy for nursing, healthcare, emergency medical, police, firefighting and business careers, upgrade aging infrastructure, acquire sites, equipment, construct/repair buildings/science labs, by issuing $297,500,000 million in bonds, at legal rates with independent citizens\u2019 oversight/no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7017, "fingerprint": "2008|200800492|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800492|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "19256dd129e660f8", "measure_id": "200800492", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make essential health/safety repairs, retain teachers, qualify for matching grants, shall Long Beach Unified School District retrofit schools for earthquake safety/handicap accessibility, repair restrooms/plumbing/roofs/fire safety, remove lead paint/asbestos, upgrade vocational classrooms/technology/energy efficiency, expand after-school programs, reduce overcrowding, by acquiring, repairing, constructing, equipping sites, facilities, joint-use buildings, and issuing $1,200,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with independent audits, citizen\u2019s oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 123253, "no_votes": 47639, "total_votes": 170892, "percent_yes": 72.12333, "percent_no": 27.876670000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.226093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.288405", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make essential health/safety repairs, retain teachers, qualify for matching grants, shall Long Beach Unified School District retrofit schools for earthquake safety/handicap accessibility, repair restrooms/plumbing/roofs/fire safety, remove lead paint/asbestos, upgrade vocational classrooms/technology/energy efficiency, expand after-school programs, reduce overcrowding, by acquiring, repairing, constructing, equipping sites, facilities, joint-use buildings, and issuing $1,200,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with independent audits, citizen\u2019s oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7016, "fingerprint": "2008|200800489|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800489|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "24f3a5188f2f8e3a", "measure_id": "200800489", "measure_letter": "KC", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education/ensure safe school campuses, upgrade classroom technology to meet current teaching standards, shall El Monte City School District repair, acquire, construct, equip classrooms, sites/facilities, complete safety/energy-efficiency upgrades, replace aging roofs, heating, electrical, cooling systems, upgrade technology/add new computer labs, by issuing $75,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with independent oversight, no money for administrators? salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12515, "no_votes": 4738, "total_votes": 17253, "percent_yes": 72.53811, "percent_no": 27.461889999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.225260", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.287853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education/ensure safe school campuses, upgrade classroom technology to meet current teaching standards, shall El Monte City School District repair, acquire, construct, equip classrooms, sites/facilities, complete safety/energy-efficiency upgrades, replace aging roofs, heating, electrical, cooling systems, upgrade technology/add new computer labs, by issuing $75,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with independent oversight, no money for administrators? salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7000, "fingerprint": "2008|200800342|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800342|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d4baede9a9e01183", "measure_id": "200800342", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to update and continue the telecommunications portion of Lakewood\u2019s utility users tax to fund law enforcement, gang and drug prevention programs, after-school activities, senior transportation, parks, street and traffic signal maintenance and other essential services, with exemptions for low-income residents and seniors and provisions for equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology used, annual audits, public review of expenditures, no rate increases without voter approval, and local control of revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25678, "no_votes": 6852, "total_votes": 32530, "percent_yes": 78.93637, "percent_no": 21.063630000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.218469", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.283088", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to update and continue the telecommunications portion of Lakewood\u2019s utility users tax to fund law enforcement, gang and drug prevention programs, after-school activities, senior transportation, parks, street and traffic signal maintenance and other essential services, with exemptions for low-income residents and seniors and provisions for equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology used, annual audits, public review of expenditures, no rate increases without voter approval, and local control of revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11590, "fingerprint": "2008|200800593|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800593|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "229f202eade2d371", "measure_id": "200800593", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance titled the \"Maywood Ethics in Government Hiring and Contracting Practices Initiative,\" be adopted to require minimum qualifications for the position  of chief of police, to provide that the chief administrative officer is the administrative authority over all City staff, to mandate the use of request for proposals/qualifications procedures for the hiring of consultants providing services to the City, and to implement a nepotism policy in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1199, "no_votes": 807, "total_votes": 2006, "percent_yes": 59.770685, "percent_no": 40.229315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-12-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.302837", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.231727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.291946", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance titled the \"Maywood Ethics in Government Hiring and Contracting Practices Initiative,\" be adopted to require minimum qualifications for the position  of chief of police, to provide that the chief administrative officer is the administrative authority over all City staff, to mandate the use of request for proposals/qualifications procedures for the hiring of consultants providing services to the City, and to implement a nepotism policy in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11584, "fingerprint": "2008|200800491|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800491|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1ec182311c2ac4fd", "measure_id": "200800491", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high academic achievement, enhance student safety, and improve the 80 year old auditorium and the athletic facilities frequently used by the community, by repairing outdated wiring and plumbing, improving energy efficiency, reducing water use, and mitigating safety hazards and accessibility issues, shall the El Segundo Unified School District issue up to $14,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with all funds used locally, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5602, "no_votes": 2724, "total_votes": 8326, "percent_yes": 67.28321000000001, "percent_no": 32.71678999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.299101", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.225812", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.288216", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high academic achievement, enhance student safety, and improve the 80 year old auditorium and the athletic facilities frequently used by the community, by repairing outdated wiring and plumbing, improving energy efficiency, reducing water use, and mitigating safety hazards and accessibility issues, shall the El Segundo Unified School District issue up to $14,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with all funds used locally, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6996, "fingerprint": "2008|200800186|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800186|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "baa97cc9d4fde919", "measure_id": "200800186", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct and modernize school facilities, shall the Los Nietos School District be authorized to upgrade classrooms and security, improve student safety and school sites, renovate outdated restrooms, and replace roofs by issuing up to $31,140,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for overhead or administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 738, "no_votes": 291, "total_votes": 1029, "percent_yes": 71.72012, "percent_no": 28.279880000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.216522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.281784", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct and modernize school facilities, shall the Los Nietos School District be authorized to upgrade classrooms and security, improve student safety and school sites, renovate outdated restrooms, and replace roofs by issuing up to $31,140,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for overhead or administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7004, "fingerprint": "2008|200800350|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800350|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "da48de8355c23a62", "measure_id": "200800350", "measure_letter": "MC", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a Transactions and Use Tax at the rate of one percent (1%); in order to continue funding general municipal services, such as police, fire protection and paramedic, street maintenance, parks and libraries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2238, "no_votes": 2448, "total_votes": 4686, "percent_yes": 47.759283, "percent_no": 52.240717, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.220753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.285040", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a Transactions and Use Tax at the rate of one percent (1%); in order to continue funding general municipal services, such as police, fire protection and paramedic, street maintenance, parks and libraries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7013, "fingerprint": "2008|200800485|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800485|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4939213f72a88239", "measure_id": "200800485", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local elementary education, repair, upgrade outdated classrooms, plumbing, roofing, lighting, electrical systems, libraries, upgrade safety, security, fire systems, remove hazardous materials, replace temporary classrooms with permanent classrooms, earthquake-retrofit classrooms, renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip classrooms, schools, science labs, sites, facilities, shall Alhambra Unified School District Elementary Schools Improvement District issue $50,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23276, "no_votes": 7804, "total_votes": 31080, "percent_yes": 74.89061, "percent_no": 25.109390000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.224105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.287093", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local elementary education, repair, upgrade outdated classrooms, plumbing, roofing, lighting, electrical systems, libraries, upgrade safety, security, fire systems, remove hazardous materials, replace temporary classrooms with permanent classrooms, earthquake-retrofit classrooms, renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip classrooms, schools, science labs, sites, facilities, shall Alhambra Unified School District Elementary Schools Improvement District issue $50,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7025, "fingerprint": "2008|200800500|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800500|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "993392a26679ec43", "measure_id": "200800500", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade outdated heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, and deteriorating plumbing; make health, safety, and handicapped accessibility upgrades, and improve drinking water; implement computer and technology upgrades; install security and monitoring systems to increase student safety; and acquire, construct, repair, replace and modernize classrooms, cafeterias, and school facilities; shall Rosemead School District issue $30 million in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits and independent citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4325, "no_votes": 1568, "total_votes": 5893, "percent_yes": 73.39215999999999, "percent_no": 26.60784000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.228609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.289916", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade outdated heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, and deteriorating plumbing; make health, safety, and handicapped accessibility upgrades, and improve drinking water; implement computer and technology upgrades; install security and monitoring systems to increase student safety; and acquire, construct, repair, replace and modernize classrooms, cafeterias, and school facilities; shall Rosemead School District issue $30 million in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits and independent citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11580, "fingerprint": "2008|200800351|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800351|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0a556997c47a3dc0", "measure_id": "200800351", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve public safety, community programs and prevent significant cuts to essential services, by funding general City services including hiring additional police, maintaining anti-gang and graffiti efforts, youth and after-school parks and recreation services, expanding library and parks, fixing City streets, and other essential neighborhood improvements, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and financial oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13787, "no_votes": 6389, "total_votes": 20176, "percent_yes": 68.33366, "percent_no": 31.666340000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.296139", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.221121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.285221", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve public safety, community programs and prevent significant cuts to essential services, by funding general City services including hiring additional police, maintaining anti-gang and graffiti efforts, youth and after-school parks and recreation services, expanding library and parks, fixing City streets, and other essential neighborhood improvements, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and financial oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11570, "fingerprint": "2008|200800138|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800138|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ee9e3d8efcfa415e", "measure_id": "200800138", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve public safety and prevent significant cuts to City services, by funding general City services such as hiring additional police officers, maintaining youth anti-gang and anti-drug programs, after-school parks and recreation services, graffiti removal, maintaining neighborhood parks, fixing potholes and City streets, and other essential City services, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with guaranteed independent annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and citizens\u2019 financial oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2659, "no_votes": 915, "total_votes": 3574, "percent_yes": 74.39843400000001, "percent_no": 25.60156599999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.292156", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.214976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.280824", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve public safety and prevent significant cuts to City services, by funding general City services such as hiring additional police officers, maintaining youth anti-gang and anti-drug programs, after-school parks and recreation services, graffiti removal, maintaining neighborhood parks, fixing potholes and City streets, and other essential City services, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with guaranteed independent annual financial audits, expenditure reports, and citizens\u2019 financial oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6991, "fingerprint": "2008|200800110|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800110|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "909f2805d9419702", "measure_id": "200800110", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to: 1) prohibit paying City police officers less than the lowest of 10 San Gabriel Valley police departments; 2) prohibit providing benefits for the City police officers at less than the average of benefits to police officers in those 10 departments; and 3) prohibit reducing the number of police department positions from the number budgeted in the 2004-2005 fiscal year or contracting our general police services without voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 537, "no_votes": 1971, "total_votes": 2508, "percent_yes": 21.411483, "percent_no": 78.588517, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.213874", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.280096", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to: 1) prohibit paying City police officers less than the lowest of 10 San Gabriel Valley police departments; 2) prohibit providing benefits for the City police officers at less than the average of benefits to police officers in those 10 departments; and 3) prohibit reducing the number of police department positions from the number budgeted in the 2004-2005 fiscal year or contracting our general police services without voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7005, "fingerprint": "2008|200800352|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800352|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8b0c824978120ed2", "measure_id": "200800352", "measure_letter": "PC", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should a temporary two years and two months Utility Users Tax (UUT) rate increase be enacted in the City of Pomona in the amount of one percent (1.0%) for Citywide improvements and services from nine percent (9.0%) to ten percent (10%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8127, "no_votes": 21319, "total_votes": 29446, "percent_yes": 27.599674, "percent_no": 72.400326, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.221491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.285405", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should a temporary two years and two months Utility Users Tax (UUT) rate increase be enacted in the City of Pomona in the amount of one percent (1.0%) for Citywide improvements and services from nine percent (9.0%) to ten percent (10%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7024, "fingerprint": "2008|200800499|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800499|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "97964221d070da65", "measure_id": "200800499", "measure_letter": "PS", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair old plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; provide academic academies and magnet schools; upgrade technology; improve access to computers; expand science labs; renovate and construct classrooms and educational facilities, and make the District eligible to receive and estimated $47.5 million in State matching grants, shall Pomona Unified School District issue $235 million of bonds at lowest possible interest rates, with no money for administrative salaries, and spending annually reviewed by an independent oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30058, "no_votes": 10163, "total_votes": 40221, "percent_yes": 74.732107, "percent_no": 25.267893, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.228335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.289730", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair old plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; provide academic academies and magnet schools; upgrade technology; improve access to computers; expand science labs; renovate and construct classrooms and educational facilities, and make the District eligible to receive and estimated $47.5 million in State matching grants, shall Pomona Unified School District issue $235 million of bonds at lowest possible interest rates, with no money for administrative salaries, and spending annually reviewed by an independent oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7019, "fingerprint": "2008|200800494|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800494|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5fe8afb67d071d80", "measure_id": "200800494", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student health, safety and educational quality, shall the Los Angeles Unified School District: continue repair/upgrade of aging/deteriorating classrooms, restrooms; upgrade fire/earthquake safety; reduce asbestos, lead paint, air pollution, water quality hazards; build/upgrade specialized classrooms students need to meet job/college requirements; improve classroom Internet access by issuing $7 billion in bonds, at legal interest rates; with guaranteed annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no increase in maximum tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 885467, "no_votes": 395852, "total_votes": 1281319, "percent_yes": 69.10589999999999, "percent_no": 30.89410000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.226718", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.288791", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student health, safety and educational quality, shall the Los Angeles Unified School District: continue repair/upgrade of aging/deteriorating classrooms, restrooms; upgrade fire/earthquake safety; reduce asbestos, lead paint, air pollution, water quality hazards; build/upgrade specialized classrooms students need to meet job/college requirements; improve classroom Internet access by issuing $7 billion in bonds, at legal interest rates; with guaranteed annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no increase in maximum tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6988, "fingerprint": "2008|200800063|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800063|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0cb07eb42d858656", "measure_id": "200800063", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve quality schools despite inadequate state funding, and prevent program cuts shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District renew - without increasing -- existing school parcel taxes, annually adjusted for inflation, with exemptions for homes owned and occupied by senior citizens, and annual audits reported to taxpayers by Independent Citizens Oversight Committee? Funds used to retain highly qualified teachers and reduced class size, protect excellence in math, science, technology, arts, music, reading; sustain libraries. No funds used for administrator salaries.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27525, "no_votes": 10165, "total_votes": 37690, "percent_yes": 73.029983, "percent_no": 26.970017, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.211636", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.278624", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve quality schools despite inadequate state funding, and prevent program cuts shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District renew - without increasing -- existing school parcel taxes, annually adjusted for inflation, with exemptions for homes owned and occupied by senior citizens, and annual audits reported to taxpayers by Independent Citizens Oversight Committee? Funds used to retain highly qualified teachers and reduced class size, protect excellence in math, science, technology, arts, music, reading; sustain libraries. No funds used for administrator salaries.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7022, "fingerprint": "2008|200800497|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800497|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5dca89534f486dcd", "measure_id": "200800497", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain academic excellence for students/nurses/firefighters by upgrading classrooms/laboratories/fire alarms, repairing roofs/plumbing, removing lead paint/asbestos, retrofitting buildings for earthquake safety/handicap accessibility, increasing energy efficiency, expanding job training, shall Mt. San Antonio Community College District repair, acquire, construct, equip buildings/sites/facilities by issuing $353,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, and no tax rate increase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 164135, "no_votes": 70510, "total_votes": 234645, "percent_yes": 69.95035, "percent_no": 30.04965, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.227729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.289346", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain academic excellence for students/nurses/firefighters by upgrading classrooms/laboratories/fire alarms, repairing roofs/plumbing, removing lead paint/asbestos, retrofitting buildings for earthquake safety/handicap accessibility, increasing energy efficiency, expanding job training, shall Mt. San Antonio Community College District repair, acquire, construct, equip buildings/sites/facilities by issuing $353,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, and no tax rate increase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6982, "fingerprint": "2008|200800027|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800027|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fad7b03b3f84e8c2", "measure_id": "200800027", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the City\u2019s tax on communications users from 10% to 9%; modernize the ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used; exempt low income senior-citizen and disabled households; to fund general municipal services, such as 911, police, fire protection, street maintenance, parks and libraries; subject to an annual independent audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 463621, "no_votes": 239513, "total_votes": 703134, "percent_yes": 65.93636000000001, "percent_no": 34.06363999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.209903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.277494", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the City\u2019s tax on communications users from 10% to 9%; modernize the ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used; exempt low income senior-citizen and disabled households; to fund general municipal services, such as 911, police, fire protection, street maintenance, parks and libraries; subject to an annual independent audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7030, "fingerprint": "2008|200800507|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800507|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5dbef70f0aa8a7e1", "measure_id": "200800507", "measure_letter": "SA", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities for local students shall William S. Hart Union High School District: repair, replace and upgrade outdated classrooms, science/computer labs, instructional technology, wiring, plumbing, heating, ventilation; improve safety to meet current fire/seismic codes, add a new high school and facilities and classrooms to relieve student overcrowding; by issuing $300,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with independent citizen\u2019s oversight, annual financial audits, all funds remaining local and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59287, "no_votes": 38529, "total_votes": 97816, "percent_yes": 60.61073999999999, "percent_no": 39.38926000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.230665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.291215", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities for local students shall William S. Hart Union High School District: repair, replace and upgrade outdated classrooms, science/computer labs, instructional technology, wiring, plumbing, heating, ventilation; improve safety to meet current fire/seismic codes, add a new high school and facilities and classrooms to relieve student overcrowding; by issuing $300,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with independent citizen\u2019s oversight, annual financial audits, all funds remaining local and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7009, "fingerprint": "2008|200800356|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800356|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c1eb03b65a6a6988", "measure_id": "200800356", "measure_letter": "SG", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general city services, including repairing, paving and maintaining local streets; keeping public areas and landscapes clean and well-maintained; preserving fire and paramedic emergency response times; improving police protection and investigations that reduce crime, shall the City of San Gabriel\u2019s existing utility users tax ordinance be amended to reflect changes in technology and federal law, and increased from 6% to 8%, with mandatory audits and all money staying local for services and facilities in San Gabriel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6517, "no_votes": 3338, "total_votes": 9855, "percent_yes": 66.12886999999999, "percent_no": 33.87113000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.222650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.286137", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general city services, including repairing, paving and maintaining local streets; keeping public areas and landscapes clean and well-maintained; preserving fire and paramedic emergency response times; improving police protection and investigations that reduce crime, shall the City of San Gabriel\u2019s existing utility users tax ordinance be amended to reflect changes in technology and federal law, and increased from 6% to 8%, with mandatory audits and all money staying local for services and facilities in San Gabriel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7010, "fingerprint": "2008|200800357|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800357|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bd138cdb1a1a2d2f", "measure_id": "200800357", "measure_letter": "SM", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to continue and update Santa Monica\u2019s Utilities Tax on telecommunication services to fund City activities including police, fire, paramedic and emergency services, school and afterschool programs, gang and drug prevention programs, parks and recreation programs, environmental protection and other general fund services, with tax-exemptions for low-income seniors and disabled residents, with provisions ensuring equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology used, and with expenditures subject to independent annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20254, "no_votes": 19147, "total_votes": 39401, "percent_yes": 51.404786, "percent_no": 48.595214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.222926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.286329", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to continue and update Santa Monica\u2019s Utilities Tax on telecommunication services to fund City activities including police, fire, paramedic and emergency services, school and afterschool programs, gang and drug prevention programs, parks and recreation programs, environmental protection and other general fund services, with tax-exemptions for low-income seniors and disabled residents, with provisions ensuring equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology used, and with expenditures subject to independent annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7011, "fingerprint": "2008|200800359|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800359|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bed1ae85f372de23", "measure_id": "200800359", "measure_letter": "SP", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance No. 2174 approving and adopting the amendment to the amended Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Revitalization Project No. 1 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6776, "no_votes": 5445, "total_votes": 12221, "percent_yes": 55.445546, "percent_no": 44.554454, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.223477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.286724", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance No. 2174 approving and adopting the amendment to the amended Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Revitalization Project No. 1 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11581, "fingerprint": "2008|200800358|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800358|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2c2bdc51f7e0f6ec", "measure_id": "200800358", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City\u2019s General Plan be amended through 2023 to establish a Citywide annual limit on commercial development of 75,000 square feet, which: would apply to the types of projects that required City Council or Planning Commission approval on 1/16/08; would not apply to specified uses such as residential, parking, hospitals, schools, care and government facilities; and would allow for borrowing from future years in the five-year average stays within the limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18439, "no_votes": 23061, "total_votes": 41500, "percent_yes": 44.431326, "percent_no": 55.568674, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.297434", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.223203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.286531", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City\u2019s General Plan be amended through 2023 to establish a Citywide annual limit on commercial development of 75,000 square feet, which: would apply to the types of projects that required City Council or Planning Commission approval on 1/16/08; would not apply to specified uses such as residential, parking, hospitals, schools, care and government facilities; and would allow for borrowing from future years in the five-year average stays within the limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6994, "fingerprint": "2008|200800139|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800139|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "760e610247157901", "measure_id": "200800139", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to ratify and update Torrance\u2019s existing telephone utility users\u2019 tax, to continue to maintain such essential city services as police, fire, street repair, parks, libraries, recreation programs and other services that are presently paid for from the city\u2019s general fund; provided that the present tax rate will not change; low-income seniors and disabled persons will remain exempt; and independent annual audits will be required?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10716, "no_votes": 8346, "total_votes": 19062, "percent_yes": 56.216556, "percent_no": 43.783444, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.215351", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.281014", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to ratify and update Torrance\u2019s existing telephone utility users\u2019 tax, to continue to maintain such essential city services as police, fire, street repair, parks, libraries, recreation programs and other services that are presently paid for from the city\u2019s general fund; provided that the present tax rate will not change; low-income seniors and disabled persons will remain exempt; and independent annual audits will be required?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7023, "fingerprint": "2008|200800498|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800498|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "32915345e36b791c", "measure_id": "200800498", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair or replace deteriorating and outdated plumbing, heating, ventilation, and fire alarm systems; replace aging portable classrooms; make disabled access improvements, implement energy- and water-saving projects; modernize or reconstruct kindergartens, cafeterias, multipurpose facilities and gyms, and make the District eligible for millions in State matching grants, shall Pasadena Unified School District issue $350,000,000 of bonds at lawful interest rates, with no money for administrative salaries, and spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64090, "no_votes": 21908, "total_votes": 85998, "percent_yes": 74.524987, "percent_no": 25.475013000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.228065", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.289538", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair or replace deteriorating and outdated plumbing, heating, ventilation, and fire alarm systems; replace aging portable classrooms; make disabled access improvements, implement energy- and water-saving projects; modernize or reconstruct kindergartens, cafeterias, multipurpose facilities and gyms, and make the District eligible for millions in State matching grants, shall Pasadena Unified School District issue $350,000,000 of bonds at lawful interest rates, with no money for administrative salaries, and spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6992, "fingerprint": "2008|200800111|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800111|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a0efc508392b1807", "measure_id": "200800111", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted increasing the City's existing Utility Users' Tax by up to 6% in order to maintain general City services such as public safety services, including police and paramedic programs, and to reflect technological advances in communications, expand existing exemptions to low and very low income households, and establish a citizen's oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1723, "no_votes": 1021, "total_votes": 2744, "percent_yes": 62.791544, "percent_no": 37.208456, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.214168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.280277", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted increasing the City's existing Utility Users' Tax by up to 6% in order to maintain general City services such as public safety services, including police and paramedic programs, and to reflect technological advances in communications, expand existing exemptions to low and very low income households, and establish a citizen's oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6993, "fingerprint": "2008|200800112|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800112|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b3069b293bd59585", "measure_id": "200800112", "measure_letter": "UA", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure 'U', the increase in the Utility Users' Tax, is approved by the voters, should the additional revenue generated by that increase be used to fund public safety services including paramedic programs, police salaries and benefits and additional safety staffing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1701, "no_votes": 955, "total_votes": 2656, "percent_yes": 64.043677, "percent_no": 35.956323, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.214434", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.280460", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure 'U', the increase in the Utility Users' Tax, is approved by the voters, should the additional revenue generated by that increase be used to fund public safety services including paramedic programs, police salaries and benefits and additional safety staffing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6999, "fingerprint": "2008|200800341|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800341|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8d7ebad529794a32", "measure_id": "200800341", "measure_letter": "UUT", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted reducing the existing tax rate on cable/telephone services from 10% to 8%, with revenues funding vital services including; anti-gang/afterschool programs, 9-1-1 emergency, public safety, fire protection, parks, recreation, graffiti abatement, libraries, and senior services; replacing outdated ordinances with a modern ordinance ensuring taxpayers are treated equally, exemptions for low-income seniors and disabled, and annual independent audits for fiscal accountability?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29590, "no_votes": 5545, "total_votes": 35135, "percent_yes": 84.218013, "percent_no": 15.781987, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.218165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.282905", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted reducing the existing tax rate on cable/telephone services from 10% to 8%, with revenues funding vital services including; anti-gang/afterschool programs, 9-1-1 emergency, public safety, fire protection, parks, recreation, graffiti abatement, libraries, and senior services; replacing outdated ordinances with a modern ordinance ensuring taxpayers are treated equally, exemptions for low-income seniors and disabled, and annual independent audits for fiscal accountability?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11575, "fingerprint": "2008|200800340|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800340|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d3b3668c22d8e7fa", "measure_id": "200800340", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1925 be adopted to maintain the rate of the City of Hawthorne\u2019s Communication Users\u2019 Tax (formerly the Telephone Users Tax and Cable Television Users Tax) at 5%; to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Communication Users\u2019 Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in federal law; to continue the tax exemption for senior-citizen and disabled households; and to ratify and approve the past collection of the Tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15704, "no_votes": 5694, "total_votes": 21398, "percent_yes": 73.39003699999999, "percent_no": 26.609963000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.294028", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.217864", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.282717", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1925 be adopted to maintain the rate of the City of Hawthorne\u2019s Communication Users\u2019 Tax (formerly the Telephone Users Tax and Cable Television Users Tax) at 5%; to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Communication Users\u2019 Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in federal law; to continue the tax exemption for senior-citizen and disabled households; and to ratify and approve the past collection of the Tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6984, "fingerprint": "2008|200800059|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800059|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ad10c522edb33ec0", "measure_id": "200800059", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct and improve school facilities, shall the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District be authorized to replace high school portable facilities with permanent classrooms, construct additional classrooms, science labs, library, and support facilities, to qualify for approximately $15,000,000 in State matching and joint-use funds by issuing up to $46,200,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2365, "no_votes": 2267, "total_votes": 4632, "percent_yes": 51.05786, "percent_no": 48.94214, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.210480", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.277879", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct and improve school facilities, shall the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District be authorized to replace high school portable facilities with permanent classrooms, construct additional classrooms, science labs, library, and support facilities, to qualify for approximately $15,000,000 in State matching and joint-use funds by issuing up to $46,200,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11586, "fingerprint": "2008|200800506|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800506|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6c85d464bb7f02f3", "measure_id": "200800506", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide excellent high schools for all students in the Whittier Union High School District; build instructional, vocational and career technical classrooms; upgrade security and student support facilities including athletic facilities; and improve heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; shall the Whittier Union High School District be authorized to issue up to $75,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51521, "no_votes": 19969, "total_votes": 71490, "percent_yes": 72.06742, "percent_no": 27.93258, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.301906", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.230385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.291035", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide excellent high schools for all students in the Whittier Union High School District; build instructional, vocational and career technical classrooms; upgrade security and student support facilities including athletic facilities; and improve heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; shall the Whittier Union High School District be authorized to issue up to $75,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6990, "fingerprint": "2008|200800104|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800104|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "400029f47e581eda", "measure_id": "200800104", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to modernize the City\u2019s Utility Users\u2019 Tax, at the existing rate: To preserve funding of general City services, such as Police, Fire, Streets, trees and parks; to reflect technological advances in communications; to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used; to retain existing exemptions for low-income seniors and the disabled; and to require an annual independent audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3333, "no_votes": 973, "total_votes": 4306, "percent_yes": 77.40361999999999, "percent_no": 22.59638000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.212235", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.278993", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to modernize the City\u2019s Utility Users\u2019 Tax, at the existing rate: To preserve funding of general City services, such as Police, Fire, Streets, trees and parks; to reflect technological advances in communications; to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used; to retain existing exemptions for low-income seniors and the disabled; and to require an annual independent audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7029, "fingerprint": "2008|200800505|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800505|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d09852c99e505309", "measure_id": "200800505", "measure_letter": "WS", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; construct new elementary and middle schools to reduce overcrowding; upgrade and renovate outdated classrooms; increase student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and security improvements; and qualify the District for $72 million in State-matching grants, shall the Westside Union School District issue $63.5 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with no money for teacher or administrative salaries, and spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens? oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16127, "no_votes": 9533, "total_votes": 25660, "percent_yes": 62.848794, "percent_no": 37.151206, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.230116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.290853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; construct new elementary and middle schools to reduce overcrowding; upgrade and renovate outdated classrooms; increase student access to computers and modern technology; make health, safety and security improvements; and qualify the District for $72 million in State-matching grants, shall the Westside Union School District issue $63.5 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with no money for teacher or administrative salaries, and spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens? oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7027, "fingerprint": "2008|200800502|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800502|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "53c63a04f2869fec", "measure_id": "200800502", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make classrooms and core academic facilities safe and modern, improve learning and qualify for State matching money, shall Torrance Unified School District renovate or replace outdated classrooms and school buildings; repair damaged walls and floors; replace worn-out roofs, plumbing and lighting systems; repair faulty drainage systems, hardscapes, and other safety hazards, by issuing $265 million in bonds at legal interest rates with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44075, "no_votes": 15192, "total_votes": 59267, "percent_yes": 74.36685, "percent_no": 25.63315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.229148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.290293", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make classrooms and core academic facilities safe and modern, improve learning and qualify for State matching money, shall Torrance Unified School District renovate or replace outdated classrooms and school buildings; repair damaged walls and floors; replace worn-out roofs, plumbing and lighting systems; repair faulty drainage systems, hardscapes, and other safety hazards, by issuing $265 million in bonds at legal interest rates with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11585, "fingerprint": "2008|200800503|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800503|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c6cc2cd7d8053f10", "measure_id": "200800503", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To fund additional upgrades to school facilities that support student learning and extracurricular activities, shall Torrance Unified School District also issue $90 million in bonds at legal interest rates to renovate worn-out physical education facilities and playgrounds for health and safety; construct music/art classrooms and science labs; and replace deteriorating covered walkways to establish a safe school environment; with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41832, "no_votes": 16684, "total_votes": 58516, "percent_yes": 71.48814, "percent_no": 28.51186, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.301347", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.229477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.290476", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund additional upgrades to school facilities that support student learning and extracurricular activities, shall Torrance Unified School District also issue $90 million in bonds at legal interest rates to renovate worn-out physical education facilities and playgrounds for health and safety; construct music/art classrooms and science labs; and replace deteriorating covered walkways to establish a safe school environment; with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, and all money staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 6989, "fingerprint": "2008|200800103|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800103|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0a3a870124c18645", "measure_id": "200800103", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Admissions Tax Rate be raised from 4% to 6%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 192, "no_votes": 566, "total_votes": 758, "percent_yes": 25.329816, "percent_no": 74.670184, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.211899", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.278809", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Admissions Tax Rate be raised from 4% to 6%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7032, "fingerprint": "2008|200800064|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800064|MADERA", "content_hash": "b60e62842f2ffdd4", "measure_id": "200800064", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without authorizing any additional bonds or taxes, shall the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District\u2019s Bond Measure \u201cR\u201d passed by the District\u2019s voters on June 6, 2006, be amended so that those bond funds may be used to provide matching funds needed to qualify for approximately $1 million in special State funding for a joint use multi-purpose room project at Oakhurst Elementary School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3097, "no_votes": 1029, "total_votes": 4126, "percent_yes": 75.06059400000001, "percent_no": 24.93940599999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.232370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.292310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without authorizing any additional bonds or taxes, shall the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District\u2019s Bond Measure \u201cR\u201d passed by the District\u2019s voters on June 6, 2006, be amended so that those bond funds may be used to provide matching funds needed to qualify for approximately $1 million in special State funding for a joint use multi-purpose room project at Oakhurst Elementary School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7031, "fingerprint": "2008|200800029|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800029|MADERA", "content_hash": "322af4a9ff21d9a1", "measure_id": "200800029", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on September 25, 2007 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Madera County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as the Town of Oakhurst be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 884, "no_votes": 1126, "total_votes": 2010, "percent_yes": 43.9801, "percent_no": 56.0199, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.232033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.292131", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on September 25, 2007 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Madera County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as the Town of Oakhurst be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7033, "fingerprint": "2008|200800187|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800187|MADERA", "content_hash": "9867ef1c8a965d67", "measure_id": "200800187", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, construct classrooms and a library; renovate existing classrooms and facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Northern Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $11,800,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators? salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30, "no_votes": 54, "total_votes": 84, "percent_yes": 35.714287, "percent_no": 64.285713, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.232675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.292501", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, construct classrooms and a library; renovate existing classrooms and facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Northern Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $11,800,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators? salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11596, "fingerprint": "2008|200800508|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800508|MARIN", "content_hash": "7aef6ac783b269c6", "measure_id": "200800508", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect educational quality; attract and keep high-quality teachers; maintain library services and P.E. programs; preserve small neighborhood schools and class sizes; and prevent significant budget cuts due to reductions in State education funding; shall the Mill Valley School District amend its existing parcel tax for local elementary and middle schools, increasing it by $193 and extending it for four years, while continuing existing accountability measures and with all revenues spent in Mill Valley schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13607, "no_votes": 4683, "total_votes": 18290, "percent_yes": 74.39585, "percent_no": 25.604150000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.305714", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.236046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.294694", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect educational quality; attract and keep high-quality teachers; maintain library services and P.E. programs; preserve small neighborhood schools and class sizes; and prevent significant budget cuts due to reductions in State education funding; shall the Mill Valley School District amend its existing parcel tax for local elementary and middle schools, increasing it by $193 and extending it for four years, while continuing existing accountability measures and with all revenues spent in Mill Valley schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11592, "fingerprint": "2008|200800189|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800189|MARIN", "content_hash": "5fdbb6bbac32509a", "measure_id": "200800189", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funding to complete necessary school facilities improvements in one phase, including second-story classrooms, eliminating the need For long-term portable classrooms along Ross Common and creating space for a privately-funded gymnasium/community center, shall the Ross School District be authorized to issue up to $6.75 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit as specified in the Bond Project List, with a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee to monitor all financial activity?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 894, "no_votes": 289, "total_votes": 1183, "percent_yes": 75.570583, "percent_no": 24.429417, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.304601", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.234435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.293599", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding to complete necessary school facilities improvements in one phase, including second-story classrooms, eliminating the need For long-term portable classrooms along Ross Common and creating space for a privately-funded gymnasium/community center, shall the Ross School District be authorized to issue up to $6.75 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit as specified in the Bond Project List, with a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee to monitor all financial activity?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7035, "fingerprint": "2008|200800065|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800065|MARIN", "content_hash": "06b7f329429a0271", "measure_id": "200800065", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellence in Kentfield\u2019s public education by supporting superior core programs, attracting/retaining highly-qualified teachers, maintaining small class sizes, and enhancing technology programs, shall Kentfield School district levy parcel taxes, to continue existing assessments, at $773.94 per year for parcels containing one single-family residence, and at rates specified in the sample ballot for all other parcels, increase rates by 5% per year, grant senior exemptions, and implement an annual financial audit, for ten years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4216, "no_votes": 1661, "total_votes": 5877, "percent_yes": 71.73728299999999, "percent_no": 28.26271700000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.233221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.292865", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellence in Kentfield\u2019s public education by supporting superior core programs, attracting/retaining highly-qualified teachers, maintaining small class sizes, and enhancing technology programs, shall Kentfield School district levy parcel taxes, to continue existing assessments, at $773.94 per year for parcels containing one single-family residence, and at rates specified in the sample ballot for all other parcels, increase rates by 5% per year, grant senior exemptions, and implement an annual financial audit, for ten years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11593, "fingerprint": "2008|200800231|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800231|MARIN", "content_hash": "bf3227aaaeadfdff", "measure_id": "200800231", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Marin establish an appointed director of finance consolidating the offices of auditor, controller, tax collector and treasurer, and create an appointed public administrator, with the provision that an annual independent audit be conducted and that the director of finance can only be removed with a public hearing and 4/5 vote of the Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71158, "no_votes": 48482, "total_votes": 119640, "percent_yes": 59.476763, "percent_no": 40.523237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.304787", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.234707", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.293787", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Marin establish an appointed director of finance consolidating the offices of auditor, controller, tax collector and treasurer, and create an appointed public administrator, with the provision that an annual independent audit be conducted and that the director of finance can only be removed with a public hearing and 4/5 vote of the Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11591, "fingerprint": "2008|200800188|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800188|MARIN", "content_hash": "cbf9d3e8b8f4da7e", "measure_id": "200800188", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain small class sizes structured in appropriate multi-grade classroom configurations, to increase compensation for teachers and staff, and to support school operations and vital instructional programs, should the Nicasio School District implement a parcel tax commencing July 1, 2008 for a period of eight (8) years at a rate of $375.00 per parcel, with a 4% annual cost of living adjustment for each year thereafter, with an exemption for property owners 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 174, "no_votes": 68, "total_votes": 242, "percent_yes": 71.900827, "percent_no": 28.099172999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.304416", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.234096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.293416", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain small class sizes structured in appropriate multi-grade classroom configurations, to increase compensation for teachers and staff, and to support school operations and vital instructional programs, should the Nicasio School District implement a parcel tax commencing July 1, 2008 for a period of eight (8) years at a rate of $375.00 per parcel, with a 4% annual cost of living adjustment for each year thereafter, with an exemption for property owners 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7034, "fingerprint": "2008|200800005|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800005|MARIN", "content_hash": "57c0d4ecb7925ca8", "measure_id": "200800005", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Muir Beach CSD Ordinance No. 2007-1, which imposes an annual special tax of two hundred($200.00) dollars for a period of four(4) years, commencing FY 2008-2009 and terminating in FY 2012-2013, on each parcel within the Muir Beach CSD for fire protection, including fuel abatement and emergency preparedness, be approved and shall the Muir Beach CSD appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 165, "no_votes": 36, "total_votes": 201, "percent_yes": 82.08955, "percent_no": 17.910449999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.232945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.292685", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Muir Beach CSD Ordinance No. 2007-1, which imposes an annual special tax of two hundred($200.00) dollars for a period of four(4) years, commencing FY 2008-2009 and terminating in FY 2012-2013, on each parcel within the Muir Beach CSD for fire protection, including fuel abatement and emergency preparedness, be approved and shall the Muir Beach CSD appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11594, "fingerprint": "2008|200800360|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800360|MARIN", "content_hash": "544de58b7013b4c6", "measure_id": "200800360", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To reduce plastic pollution, dependence on foreign oil, impacts to marine ecosystems and unsightly litter, shall an ordinance be adopted to require the use of recyclable paper and/or reusable checkout bags by all shops, stores, eating places and retail food vendors located in the Town of Fairfax, and provide penalties for violations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3705, "no_votes": 1014, "total_votes": 4719, "percent_yes": 78.512394, "percent_no": 21.487606, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.305341", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.235507", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.294330", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce plastic pollution, dependence on foreign oil, impacts to marine ecosystems and unsightly litter, shall an ordinance be adopted to require the use of recyclable paper and/or reusable checkout bags by all shops, stores, eating places and retail food vendors located in the Town of Fairfax, and provide penalties for violations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7036, "fingerprint": "2008|200800140|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800140|MARIN", "content_hash": "c47c8506dd7f11f6", "measure_id": "200800140", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue adjusting its appropriation limit for the annual fire protection and emergency medical services levy, pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, for the period 7/1/2008 through 6/30/2012?  The levy for FY 2008-2009 shall not exceed the rate authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code.  (The current levy is $548 per residential dwelling unit, $625 per occupancy in commercial structures, and $110 per vacant parcel.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 611, "no_votes": 95, "total_votes": 706, "percent_yes": 86.54391, "percent_no": 13.456090000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.233491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.293052", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue adjusting its appropriation limit for the annual fire protection and emergency medical services levy, pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, for the period 7/1/2008 through 6/30/2012?  The levy for FY 2008-2009 shall not exceed the rate authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code.  (The current levy is $548 per residential dwelling unit, $625 per occupancy in commercial structures, and $110 per vacant parcel.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11595, "fingerprint": "2008|200800361|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800361|MARIN", "content_hash": "be30ff389671bf00", "measure_id": "200800361", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of Town Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1989, "no_votes": 2064, "total_votes": 4053, "percent_yes": 49.07476, "percent_no": 50.92524, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.305529", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.235781", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.294514", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of Town Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7037, "fingerprint": "2008|200800141|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800141|MARIN", "content_hash": "453aeb17653bbe31", "measure_id": "200800141", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance authorizing levy of the general municipal services tax from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2012, thereby increasing the appropriations limit of the Town of Ross, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 612, "no_votes": 343, "total_votes": 955, "percent_yes": 64.08376700000001, "percent_no": 35.91623299999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.233757", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.293233", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance authorizing levy of the general municipal services tax from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2012, thereby increasing the appropriations limit of the Town of Ross, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7038, "fingerprint": "2008|200800232|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800232|MARIN", "content_hash": "cf1f3b7330a5d9ce", "measure_id": "200800232", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the fiscal years 2008-09 through 2011-12 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for fire protection services previously approved by the voters in November 2003.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1996, "no_votes": 518, "total_votes": 2514, "percent_yes": 79.395384, "percent_no": 20.604615999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.234975", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.293967", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the fiscal years 2008-09 through 2011-12 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for fire protection services previously approved by the voters in November 2003.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7039, "fingerprint": "2008|200800233|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800233|MARIN", "content_hash": "eb0bcfb13138eb96", "measure_id": "200800233", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the four fiscal years 2009-10 through 2012-13 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for park maintenance previously approved by the voters in March, 2005.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1904, "no_votes": 603, "total_votes": 2507, "percent_yes": 75.94735, "percent_no": 24.05265, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.235241", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.294147", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit established for Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the four fiscal years 2009-10 through 2012-13 in the amount equal to the revenue received from the special tax for park maintenance previously approved by the voters in March, 2005.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7040, "fingerprint": "2008|200800066|MARIPOSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800066|MARIPOSA", "content_hash": "b60e62842f2ffdd4", "measure_id": "200800066", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Mariposa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without authorizing any additional bonds or taxes, shall the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District\u2019s Bond Measure \u201cR\u201d passed by the District\u2019s voters on June 6, 2006, be amended so that those bond funds may be used to provide matching funds needed to qualify for approximately $1 million in special State funding for a joint use multi-purpose room project at Oakhurst Elementary School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72, "no_votes": 39, "total_votes": 111, "percent_yes": 64.86486000000001, "percent_no": 35.13513999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.236320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.294875", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without authorizing any additional bonds or taxes, shall the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District\u2019s Bond Measure \u201cR\u201d passed by the District\u2019s voters on June 6, 2006, be amended so that those bond funds may be used to provide matching funds needed to qualify for approximately $1 million in special State funding for a joint use multi-purpose room project at Oakhurst Elementary School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mariposa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7041, "fingerprint": "2008|200800067|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800067|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "c3ce51be5d8321e8", "measure_id": "200800067", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education provided by our local schools by maintaining small class sizes, enhancing basic programs like reading, writing, and mathematics; enhancing music, art and classroom technology; expanding library services; helping students prepare for today?s local jobs by enhancing vocational/agricultural/technical education; shall Willits Unified School District levy a $39 annual tax per parcel for eight years, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and exemptions for senior citizens and owners of multiple parcels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2792, "no_votes": 1540, "total_votes": 4332, "percent_yes": 64.45060000000001, "percent_no": 35.54939999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.236737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.295068", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education provided by our local schools by maintaining small class sizes, enhancing basic programs like reading, writing, and mathematics; enhancing music, art and classroom technology; expanding library services; helping students prepare for today?s local jobs by enhancing vocational/agricultural/technical education; shall Willits Unified School District levy a $39 annual tax per parcel for eight years, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and exemptions for senior citizens and owners of multiple parcels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7042, "fingerprint": "2008|200800117|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800117|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "8faf34a5cf94bccb", "measure_id": "200800117", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance titled \"The Repeal Of (Measure G) Mendocino County Code Chapter 9.36 Cannabis Personal Use Ordinance For Mendocino County, And Adoption Of New Guidelines For Maintenance And Possession Of Medical Marijuana That Do Not Exceed The Minimum State Limits\" be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14577, "no_votes": 13369, "total_votes": 27946, "percent_yes": 52.16131000000001, "percent_no": 47.83868999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.237109", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.295250", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance titled \"The Repeal Of (Measure G) Mendocino County Code Chapter 9.36 Cannabis Personal Use Ordinance For Mendocino County, And Adoption Of New Guidelines For Maintenance And Possession Of Medical Marijuana That Do Not Exceed The Minimum State Limits\" be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7043, "fingerprint": "2008|200800190|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800190|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "b6ac417a2414509e", "measure_id": "200800190", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, modernize, and improve school facilities, including replacing outdated heating and plumbing systems, replacing leaky roofs, and installing solar panels to reduce energy costs, shall Fort Bragg Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $16,000,000 in bonds at legally permitted interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are spent on administator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3329, "no_votes": 1484, "total_votes": 4813, "percent_yes": 69.16684, "percent_no": 30.833160000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.237380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.295429", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, modernize, and improve school facilities, including replacing outdated heating and plumbing systems, replacing leaky roofs, and installing solar panels to reduce energy costs, shall Fort Bragg Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $16,000,000 in bonds at legally permitted interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are spent on administator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7044, "fingerprint": "2008|200800191|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800191|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "2c1424254afe6c0e", "measure_id": "200800191", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide financing to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities in Leggett, including replacing outdated trailers with permanent classrooms and facilities, reconfiguring the Leggett school site, improving athletic facilities and site infrastructure, and upgrading electrical fixtures and wiring to expand access to modern technology, shall the Leggett Valley Unified School District Facility Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue $1,750,000 in bonds for the acquisition and improvement of school property, subject to specified accountability measures and within legal interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 79, "no_votes": 57, "total_votes": 136, "percent_yes": 58.08824, "percent_no": 41.91176, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.237651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.295615", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide financing to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities in Leggett, including replacing outdated trailers with permanent classrooms and facilities, reconfiguring the Leggett school site, improving athletic facilities and site infrastructure, and upgrading electrical fixtures and wiring to expand access to modern technology, shall the Leggett Valley Unified School District Facility Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue $1,750,000 in bonds for the acquisition and improvement of school property, subject to specified accountability measures and within legal interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7045, "fingerprint": "2008|200800068|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800068|MERCED", "content_hash": "b88e7cb216d30d43", "measure_id": "200800068", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education and reduce overcrowding in our neighborhood schools by: building a new high school and additional elementary schools to reduce severe classroom overcrowding at all grade levels, upgrading classroom technology at all schools, repairing outdated and deteriorating air conditioning, heating and ventilation systems; Shall Los Banos Unified School District issue 44 million dollars in bonds with Independent Citizen Oversight, annual financial audits and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4285, "no_votes": 2273, "total_votes": 6558, "percent_yes": 65.34004, "percent_no": 34.65996, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.237917", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.295800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education and reduce overcrowding in our neighborhood schools by: building a new high school and additional elementary schools to reduce severe classroom overcrowding at all grade levels, upgrading classroom technology at all schools, repairing outdated and deteriorating air conditioning, heating and ventilation systems; Shall Los Banos Unified School District issue 44 million dollars in bonds with Independent Citizen Oversight, annual financial audits and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7046, "fingerprint": "2008|200800142|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800142|MERCED", "content_hash": "52a182242f2c67de", "measure_id": "200800142", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Mayor be elected to a four year term beginning with the 2008 general election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 252, "no_votes": 153, "total_votes": 405, "percent_yes": 62.222224, "percent_no": 37.777776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.238218", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.295981", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mayor be elected to a four year term beginning with the 2008 general election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7047, "fingerprint": "2008|200800509|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800509|MERCED", "content_hash": "d55a5bdc65a31e7a", "measure_id": "200800509", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and high school safety, shall Merced Union High School District expand vocational/job-training facilities, upgrade educational technology, add class rooms/facilities and construct a new school to relieve overcrowding/growth, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, and improve/acquire/construct school classrooms, joint-use/facilities, sites and equipment, by issuing $149,450,000 of bonds at legal rates, qualifiying for State matching funds, with independent oversight, no money for admistrator salaries, and all funds benefiting local high school?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25266, "no_votes": 15111, "total_votes": 40377, "percent_yes": 62.575230000000005, "percent_no": 37.424769999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.238496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.296162", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and high school safety, shall Merced Union High School District expand vocational/job-training facilities, upgrade educational technology, add class rooms/facilities and construct a new school to relieve overcrowding/growth, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, and improve/acquire/construct school classrooms, joint-use/facilities, sites and equipment, by issuing $149,450,000 of bonds at legal rates, qualifiying for State matching funds, with independent oversight, no money for admistrator salaries, and all funds benefiting local high school?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7048, "fingerprint": "2008|200800510|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800510|MERCED", "content_hash": "e372779ec5f22b79", "measure_id": "200800510", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, school and community safety, access to physical education, provide a space for supervised after-school and evening activities, community meetings and student lunch, shall Planada Elementary School District construct and equip a new joint-use multipurpose room at Cesar Chavez Middle School, by issuing $2,900,000 of bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 625, "no_votes": 279, "total_votes": 904, "percent_yes": 69.13717, "percent_no": 30.862830000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.238826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.296344", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, school and community safety, access to physical education, provide a space for supervised after-school and evening activities, community meetings and student lunch, shall Planada Elementary School District construct and equip a new joint-use multipurpose room at Cesar Chavez Middle School, by issuing $2,900,000 of bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7049, "fingerprint": "2008|200800362|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800362|MODOC", "content_hash": "3e7bf3cb75539129", "measure_id": "200800362", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to provide funding supplemental to city general funds for law enforcement, fire protection and other public safety purposes, shall the City of Alturas enact a one-half cent sales tax requiring Citizens' oversight and mandatory annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 598, "no_votes": 647, "total_votes": 1245, "percent_yes": 48.03213, "percent_no": 51.96787, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.239095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.296535", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide funding supplemental to city general funds for law enforcement, fire protection and other public safety purposes, shall the City of Alturas enact a one-half cent sales tax requiring Citizens' oversight and mandatory annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7050, "fingerprint": "2008|200800118|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800118|MONO", "content_hash": "584d22851baa011a", "measure_id": "200800118", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall James Lovett be recalled (removed) from the office of Mono County Assessor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2697, "no_votes": 181, "total_votes": 2878, "percent_yes": 93.71091, "percent_no": 6.289090000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.239361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.296720", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall James Lovett be recalled (removed) from the office of Mono County Assessor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7052, "fingerprint": "2008|200800511|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800511|MONO", "content_hash": "42581196d9e7297e", "measure_id": "200800511", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, and improve local school facilities, including rebuilding Mammoth High School with modern science labs, vocational and technical classrooms, and improved access to modern technology, modernizing Mammoth Elementary and constructing additional middle school classrooms, shall Mammoth Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $65,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are spent on administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1518, "no_votes": 1665, "total_votes": 3183, "percent_yes": 47.690856, "percent_no": 52.309144, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.239893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.297083", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, and improve local school facilities, including rebuilding Mammoth High School with modern science labs, vocational and technical classrooms, and improved access to modern technology, modernizing Mammoth Elementary and constructing additional middle school classrooms, shall Mammoth Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $65,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and provided no funds are spent on administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7051, "fingerprint": "2008|200800143|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800143|MONO", "content_hash": "b47847c5d14a4536", "measure_id": "200800143", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance imposing a Transactions and Use Tax, in the amount of one-half of one percent, for the purpose of funding Recreation, Trails and Parks, to be administered by the State Board of Equalization, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1055, "no_votes": 415, "total_votes": 1470, "percent_yes": 71.76871, "percent_no": 28.23129, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.239626", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.296900", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance imposing a Transactions and Use Tax, in the amount of one-half of one percent, for the purpose of funding Recreation, Trails and Parks, to be administered by the State Board of Equalization, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7061, "fingerprint": "2008|200800513|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800513|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "5627c7f6cc0da076", "measure_id": "200800513", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; renovate and construct classrooms and educational facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for up to $50.0 million in State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (Coalinga Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $11.6 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 5, "percent_yes": 60.0, "percent_no": 40.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.242563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.298843", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; renovate and construct classrooms and educational facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for up to $50.0 million in State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (Coalinga Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $11.6 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7059, "fingerprint": "2008|200800364|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800364|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "efc21815c5433bb5", "measure_id": "200800364", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 3.30 of the City of Seaside Municipal Code, known as the utility tax law, that was approved by Seaside voters on November 5, 2002 to maintain revenues for city services, such as police, fire, parks maintenance and street repairs in Seaside, be repealed effective as of July 1, 2009?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3439, "no_votes": 4550, "total_votes": 7989, "percent_yes": 43.04669, "percent_no": 56.95331, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.242011", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.298472", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 3.30 of the City of Seaside Municipal Code, known as the utility tax law, that was approved by Seaside voters on November 5, 2002 to maintain revenues for city services, such as police, fire, parks maintenance and street repairs in Seaside, be repealed effective as of July 1, 2009?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7053, "fingerprint": "2008|200800030|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800030|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "5830b7b1dad98652", "measure_id": "200800030", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect/maintain essential City of Seaside services by hiring additional police officers and firefighters, improving 9-1-1 police/fire response times, fixing potholes, improving/maintaining City streets, youth/senior programs and parks, increasing code enforcement, expanding anti-gang/drug enforcement programs, removing graffiti/blight, and other general City services, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with published, independent annual financial audits of all expenditures available for public review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3018, "no_votes": 2171, "total_votes": 5189, "percent_yes": 58.1615, "percent_no": 41.8385, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.240234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.297268", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect/maintain essential City of Seaside services by hiring additional police officers and firefighters, improving 9-1-1 police/fire response times, fixing potholes, improving/maintaining City streets, youth/senior programs and parks, increasing code enforcement, expanding anti-gang/drug enforcement programs, removing graffiti/blight, and other general City services, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with published, independent annual financial audits of all expenditures available for public review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7056, "fingerprint": "2008|200800193|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800193|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "3848db400ad0b61d", "measure_id": "200800193", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "This is a neighborhood school transformation/safety measure. Out of concern for student safety, for improving the education of students, and qualifying for state matching funds; shall Salinas City Elementary School District modernize aging facilities; create safe pick-up/drop-off areas, renovate communications, electrical, plumbing, restrooms; acquire/construct/repair/equip classrooms/facilities, by issuing $80 million in bonds within legal maximums, with citizens? oversight to ensure expenditures only for school improvements, with all moneys benefiting local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5513, "no_votes": 3114, "total_votes": 8627, "percent_yes": 63.904023, "percent_no": 36.095977, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.241118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.297912", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "This is a neighborhood school transformation/safety measure. Out of concern for student safety, for improving the education of students, and qualifying for state matching funds; shall Salinas City Elementary School District modernize aging facilities; create safe pick-up/drop-off areas, renovate communications, electrical, plumbing, restrooms; acquire/construct/repair/equip classrooms/facilities, by issuing $80 million in bonds within legal maximums, with citizens? oversight to ensure expenditures only for school improvements, with all moneys benefiting local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7054, "fingerprint": "2008|200800144|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800144|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "41ebbe9dfe206bd3", "measure_id": "200800144", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": " To protect/maintain essential City of Pacific Grove services by funding police officers and firefighters maintaining 9-1-1 police/fire response times, fixing potholes, improving/maintaining city streets, youth programs and parks, increasing code enforcement, expanding crime prevention programs, and preserving other general City services, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with published, independent annual financial audits of all expenditures available for public review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3010, "no_votes": 1586, "total_votes": 4596, "percent_yes": 65.49173, "percent_no": 34.508269999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.240530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.297533", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": " To protect/maintain essential City of Pacific Grove services by funding police officers and firefighters maintaining 9-1-1 police/fire response times, fixing potholes, improving/maintaining city streets, youth programs and parks, increasing code enforcement, expanding crime prevention programs, and preserving other general City services, shall the City sales tax be increased by one cent with published, independent annual financial audits of all expenditures available for public review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7055, "fingerprint": "2008|200800192|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800192|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "12c510512755d462", "measure_id": "200800192", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood schools and provide for student safety, health, and learning; to replace relocatable classrooms; to acquire, construct, upgrade and equip classrooms, restrooms, facilities and sites; and to retire an outstanding facilities loan, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $18,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates for Aromas-San Juan Bautista school projects, not administrators\u2019 salaries or operating expenses, with citizens\u2019 oversight and independent public financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 313, "no_votes": 318, "total_votes": 631, "percent_yes": 49.603805, "percent_no": 50.396195, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.240806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.297722", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood schools and provide for student safety, health, and learning; to replace relocatable classrooms; to acquire, construct, upgrade and equip classrooms, restrooms, facilities and sites; and to retire an outstanding facilities loan, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $18,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates for Aromas-San Juan Bautista school projects, not administrators\u2019 salaries or operating expenses, with citizens\u2019 oversight and independent public financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7060, "fingerprint": "2008|200800512|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800512|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "02aa3c336386a7f1", "measure_id": "200800512", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve the educational quality of our schools in the face of Statewide budget cuts; to maintain programs including but not limited to science, math, music, and art; to maintain small class sizes, and library and computer lab staff; and enhance student safety and campus maintenance; shall Pacific Grove Unified School District levy tax of $35 per parcel for 5 years so long as no money is used for administrative salaries, and citizens\u2019 oversight committee is established?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7474, "no_votes": 2277, "total_votes": 9751, "percent_yes": 76.64855, "percent_no": 23.35145, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.242284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.298655", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the educational quality of our schools in the face of Statewide budget cuts; to maintain programs including but not limited to science, math, music, and art; to maintain small class sizes, and library and computer lab staff; and enhance student safety and campus maintenance; shall Pacific Grove Unified School District levy tax of $35 per parcel for 5 years so long as no money is used for administrative salaries, and citizens\u2019 oversight committee is established?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7058, "fingerprint": "2008|200800363|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800363|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "8f4e3c1d01964d2b", "measure_id": "200800363", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Pacific Grove replace its existing employee?s defined-benefit retirement plan (California Public Employees? Retirement System, or Cal PERS) with a defined-contribution retirement plan (similar to an Internal Revenue Code section 401 (k) plan)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4105, "no_votes": 3221, "total_votes": 7326, "percent_yes": 56.03331, "percent_no": 43.96669, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.241735", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.298284", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Pacific Grove replace its existing employee?s defined-benefit retirement plan (California Public Employees? Retirement System, or Cal PERS) with a defined-contribution retirement plan (similar to an Internal Revenue Code section 401 (k) plan)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7057, "fingerprint": "2008|200800234|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800234|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "56aafb48f81466bf", "measure_id": "200800234", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Monterey County voters invest in our countywide transportation network by adopting a Transportation Investment Plan providing safety/congestion relief on Highways 1, 68, 156 and 101; pothole and local road repairs; alternatives to driving alone; bus service improvements; and, transportation for the elderly and persons with disabilities funded by a 25-year half-percent sales tax and state/federal matching funds, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 77137, "no_votes": 46182, "total_votes": 123319, "percent_yes": 62.550783, "percent_no": 37.449217, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.241464", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.298097", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Monterey County voters invest in our countywide transportation network by adopting a Transportation Investment Plan providing safety/congestion relief on Highways 1, 68, 156 and 101; pothole and local road repairs; alternatives to driving alone; bus service improvements; and, transportation for the elderly and persons with disabilities funded by a 25-year half-percent sales tax and state/federal matching funds, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7062, "fingerprint": "2008|200800006|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800006|NAPA", "content_hash": "39ebdede8bc237a5", "measure_id": "200800006", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 08-01 be adopted? (Authorizes delicatessens with outdoor barbeques and wine tastings to be operated on lands in the Agricultural Produce Stand Combination Zoning District when accessory to a lawfully existing  agricultural produce stand if a conditional use permit is first obtained)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24407, "no_votes": 18100, "total_votes": 42507, "percent_yes": 57.41877600000001, "percent_no": 42.58122399999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.242845", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.299034", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 08-01 be adopted? (Authorizes delicatessens with outdoor barbeques and wine tastings to be operated on lands in the Agricultural Produce Stand Combination Zoning District when accessory to a lawfully existing  agricultural produce stand if a conditional use permit is first obtained)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7063, "fingerprint": "2008|200800069|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800069|NAPA", "content_hash": "576c9e3f2e19e954", "measure_id": "200800069", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide affordable, local higher education and career training in nursing, health care, information technology and public safety, fix deteriorating roofs, increase solar energy use to reduce costs, improve disabled access, upgrade wiring for technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, sites, facilities, shall Napa Valley Community College District issue $178,400,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens' oversight committee, and require annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22283, "no_votes": 20611, "total_votes": 42894, "percent_yes": 51.94899, "percent_no": 48.05101, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.243193", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.299217", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide affordable, local higher education and career training in nursing, health care, information technology and public safety, fix deteriorating roofs, increase solar energy use to reduce costs, improve disabled access, upgrade wiring for technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, sites, facilities, shall Napa Valley Community College District issue $178,400,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens' oversight committee, and require annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7066, "fingerprint": "2008|200800365|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800365|NAPA", "content_hash": "03a65c423f4d6825", "measure_id": "200800365", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Yountville hold an election each time the Town may pay for a Town project or improvement by issuing \u201crevenue bonds\u201d and the outstanding aggregate amount of such bonds will exceed $2,000,000? An election would not be held if the Town is complying with state or federal mandate, or responding to emergency.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 965, "no_votes": 672, "total_votes": 1637, "percent_yes": 58.94930000000001, "percent_no": 41.05069999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.244026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.300143", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Yountville hold an election each time the Town may pay for a Town project or improvement by issuing \u201crevenue bonds\u201d and the outstanding aggregate amount of such bonds will exceed $2,000,000? An election would not be held if the Town is complying with state or federal mandate, or responding to emergency.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7064, "fingerprint": "2008|200800119|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800119|NAPA", "content_hash": "6ceddbfe357b3f3e", "measure_id": "200800119", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 08-02 be adopted? (Prohibits amendment of the following provisions of Napa County General Plan/County Code without a vote of the people: (i) limits annual new residential development to 1% of county's housing stock (currently 114 units), (ii) requires 15% of residential developments to qualify as affordable housing, (iii) limits the height of single family residences to 35 feet, (iv) reduces minimum length of affordable housing guarantees from 40 to 10 years.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31691, "no_votes": 15075, "total_votes": 46766, "percent_yes": 67.765045, "percent_no": 32.234955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.243491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.299398", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 08-02 be adopted? (Prohibits amendment of the following provisions of Napa County General Plan/County Code without a vote of the people: (i) limits annual new residential development to 1% of county's housing stock (currently 114 units), (ii) requires 15% of residential developments to qualify as affordable housing, (iii) limits the height of single family residences to 35 feet, (iv) reduces minimum length of affordable housing guarantees from 40 to 10 years.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7065, "fingerprint": "2008|200800235|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800235|NAPA", "content_hash": "7b863412a78c1488", "measure_id": "200800235", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance 08-03 be adopted? (Extends to 2058 the effect of 1990 Measure J Initiative. Requires voter approval to change : (a) certain General Plan Policies relating to agricultural/open space lands, (b) agricultural/open space designation on the Land Use Map, and (c) certain land use policies adopted after passage of Measure J. Permits the Board of Supervisors to change the agricultural/open space land use designation without voter approval under specified conditions.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33128, "no_votes": 20333, "total_votes": 53461, "percent_yes": 61.96667, "percent_no": 38.03333, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.243756", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.299769", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance 08-03 be adopted? (Extends to 2058 the effect of 1990 Measure J Initiative. Requires voter approval to change : (a) certain General Plan Policies relating to agricultural/open space lands, (b) agricultural/open space designation on the Land Use Map, and (c) certain land use policies adopted after passage of Measure J. Permits the Board of Supervisors to change the agricultural/open space land use designation without voter approval under specified conditions.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7067, "fingerprint": "2008|200800194|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800194|NEVADA", "content_hash": "a21204542a57e2b0", "measure_id": "200800194", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve energy efficiency, replace portable classrooms, upgrade computer and instructional technology, expand career and vocational classrooms, meet seismic safety and snow load requirements, shall Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District issue $93,530,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip Truckee area schools, sites and facilities, with required independent public financial audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds spent locally on Truckee area schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1924, "no_votes": 1822, "total_votes": 3746, "percent_yes": 51.361454, "percent_no": 48.638546, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.244292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.300365", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve energy efficiency, replace portable classrooms, upgrade computer and instructional technology, expand career and vocational classrooms, meet seismic safety and snow load requirements, shall Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District issue $93,530,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip Truckee area schools, sites and facilities, with required independent public financial audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all funds spent locally on Truckee area schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7073, "fingerprint": "2008|200800514|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800514|NEVADA", "content_hash": "ad38a20fae3f0db3", "measure_id": "200800514", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve energy efficiency, replace portable classrooms, upgrade computer/instructional technology, expand career/vocational classrooms, meet seismic safety/snow load requirements, shall Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District issue $93,530,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip Truckee area schools, sites, facilities, with independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries and maintain 1999 voter approved tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3839, "no_votes": 4086, "total_votes": 7925, "percent_yes": 48.44164, "percent_no": 51.55836, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.245979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.301554", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve energy efficiency, replace portable classrooms, upgrade computer/instructional technology, expand career/vocational classrooms, meet seismic safety/snow load requirements, shall Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District issue $93,530,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip Truckee area schools, sites, facilities, with independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries and maintain 1999 voter approved tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7072, "fingerprint": "2008|200800370|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800370|NEVADA", "content_hash": "eec26e56060dd24f", "measure_id": "200800370", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to continue funding for paving, repairing and improving our Town's roads to enhance roadway safety for drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians including related upgrades to drainage to protect local water quality shall the Town of Truckee continue its current one-half cent sales tax for a period not to exceed 20 years, with mandatory annual audits, independent citizen oversight and all money spent on Truckee roadways and without raising taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6042, "no_votes": 1513, "total_votes": 7555, "percent_yes": 79.973525, "percent_no": 20.026475000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.245715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.301356", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to continue funding for paving, repairing and improving our Town's roads to enhance roadway safety for drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians including related upgrades to drainage to protect local water quality shall the Town of Truckee continue its current one-half cent sales tax for a period not to exceed 20 years, with mandatory annual audits, independent citizen oversight and all money spent on Truckee roadways and without raising taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7070, "fingerprint": "2008|200800368|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800368|NEVADA", "content_hash": "97521ef58ce6619b", "measure_id": "200800368", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 762, "no_votes": 1111, "total_votes": 1873, "percent_yes": 40.683395, "percent_no": 59.316605, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.245181", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.300971", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7071, "fingerprint": "2008|200800369|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800369|NEVADA", "content_hash": "0f6356d7580fba1b", "measure_id": "200800369", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 652, "no_votes": 1221, "total_votes": 1873, "percent_yes": 34.810466, "percent_no": 65.18953400000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.245453", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.301166", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7068, "fingerprint": "2008|200800366|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800366|NEVADA", "content_hash": "16bc88d87d596b95", "measure_id": "200800366", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which establishes an \"Urban Growth Boundary\" prohibiting development outside the City's Planning Area boundary shown in the General Plan; requires new development with over 100 residential units to complete a fiscal analysis showing projected revenue will exceed the City's projected expense from serving the development; and limits the number of residential building permits to the number of permits identified in the Residential Dynamics section of the 2020 General Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1723, "no_votes": 4154, "total_votes": 5877, "percent_yes": 29.317680000000003, "percent_no": 70.68232, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.244623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.300571", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which establishes an \"Urban Growth Boundary\" prohibiting development outside the City's Planning Area boundary shown in the General Plan; requires new development with over 100 residential units to complete a fiscal analysis showing projected revenue will exceed the City's projected expense from serving the development; and limits the number of residential building permits to the number of permits identified in the Residential Dynamics section of the 2020 General Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7069, "fingerprint": "2008|200800367|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800367|NEVADA", "content_hash": "6580c996c7deb2fb", "measure_id": "200800367", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City of Grass Valley General Plan by extending for thirty years the duration of the 2020 Land Use Element and related Land Use Map, and by establishing a voter approval requirement for amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, except in specified circumstances where changes by the City Council are authorized by the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1458, "no_votes": 4419, "total_votes": 5877, "percent_yes": 24.808575, "percent_no": 75.191425, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.244917", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.300773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City of Grass Valley General Plan by extending for thirty years the duration of the 2020 Land Use Element and related Land Use Map, and by establishing a voter approval requirement for amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, except in specified circumstances where changes by the City Council are authorized by the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7082, "fingerprint": "2008|200800219|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800219|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fbeb8668758ce831", "measure_id": "200800219", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Marlene Draper be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member-Trustee Area 2?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17610, "no_votes": 7812, "total_votes": 25422, "percent_yes": 69.27071000000001, "percent_no": 30.729289999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-24", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.248594", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.303302", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Marlene Draper be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member-Trustee Area 2?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 7083, "fingerprint": "2008|200800220|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800220|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6bb9211b878463e7", "measure_id": "200800220", "measure_letter": "5", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Sheila Benecke be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member-Trustee Area 5?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17564, "no_votes": 7730, "total_votes": 25294, "percent_yes": 69.43939300000001, "percent_no": 30.56060699999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-24", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.248887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.303586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sheila Benecke be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member-Trustee Area 5?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7078, "fingerprint": "2008|200800070|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800070|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4d09ea4c22a00252", "measure_id": "200800070", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent local schools, improve educational opportunities and ensure students gain the skills needed to succeed, shall Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District repair and upgrade outdated classrooms, science labs, libraries, restrooms, and technology infrastructure, improve safety and security, improve student access to technology and construct additional facilities by issuing $200,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25764, "no_votes": 19508, "total_votes": 45272, "percent_yes": 56.909347, "percent_no": 43.090653, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.247458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.302528", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent local schools, improve educational opportunities and ensure students gain the skills needed to succeed, shall Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District repair and upgrade outdated classrooms, science labs, libraries, restrooms, and technology infrastructure, improve safety and security, improve student access to technology and construct additional facilities by issuing $200,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7096, "fingerprint": "2008|200800383|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800383|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3e2b0ba5f4ceafbf", "measure_id": "200800383", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Villa Park display the national motto \"In God We Trust\" in the City Council Chambers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2791, "no_votes": 821, "total_votes": 3612, "percent_yes": 77.27020999999999, "percent_no": 22.72979000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.253646", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.306476", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Villa Park display the national motto \"In God We Trust\" in the City Council Chambers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7074, "fingerprint": "2008|200800031|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800031|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9350424d9631e30f", "measure_id": "200800031", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Newport Beach Charter be amended to require City Hall, city administrative offices and related parking to be located on City property which is bounded by Avocado Avenue to the west, San Miguel Drive on the north, and MacArthur Boulevard on the east, and Newport Beach Central Library on the south?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16938, "no_votes": 15092, "total_votes": 32030, "percent_yes": 52.881676, "percent_no": 47.118324, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.246276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.301748", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Newport Beach Charter be amended to require City Hall, city administrative offices and related parking to be located on City property which is bounded by Avocado Avenue to the west, San Miguel Drive on the north, and MacArthur Boulevard on the east, and Newport Beach Central Library on the south?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7097, "fingerprint": "2008|200800384|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800384|ORANGE", "content_hash": "86b7ffc221ed1f09", "measure_id": "200800384", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the City of Yorba Linda adopt Ordinance No. 2008-920 relating to the elimination of eminent domain for private economic development purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24665, "no_votes": 6572, "total_votes": 31237, "percent_yes": 78.96085000000001, "percent_no": 21.039149999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.254016", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.306667", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the City of Yorba Linda adopt Ordinance No. 2008-920 relating to the elimination of eminent domain for private economic development purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7075, "fingerprint": "2008|200800032|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800032|ORANGE", "content_hash": "7991bee019e134f1", "measure_id": "200800032", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 07-32 approving General Plan Amendment (GPA) 05-1018 an Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 05-126, Pacific Golf Club Residential Development, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6813, "no_votes": 15124, "total_votes": 21937, "percent_yes": 31.05712, "percent_no": 68.94288, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.246621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.301953", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 07-32 approving General Plan Amendment (GPA) 05-1018 an Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 05-126, Pacific Golf Club Residential Development, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7100, "fingerprint": "2008|200800517|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800517|ORANGE", "content_hash": "05e3fb78bc7e53e7", "measure_id": "200800517", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain academic excellence for students/nurses/firefighters by upgrading classrooms/laboratories/fire alarms, repairing roofs/plumbing, removing lead paint/asbestos, retrofitting buildings for earthquake safety/handicap accessibility, increasing energy efficiency, expanding job training, shall Mt. San Antonio Community College District repair, acquire, construct, equip buildings/sites/facilities by issuing $353,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and no tax rate increases?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42, "no_votes": 30, "total_votes": 72, "percent_yes": 58.33333, "percent_no": 41.66667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.255132", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.307243", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain academic excellence for students/nurses/firefighters by upgrading classrooms/laboratories/fire alarms, repairing roofs/plumbing, removing lead paint/asbestos, retrofitting buildings for earthquake safety/handicap accessibility, increasing energy efficiency, expanding job training, shall Mt. San Antonio Community College District repair, acquire, construct, equip buildings/sites/facilities by issuing $353,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and no tax rate increases?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7076, "fingerprint": "2008|200800033|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800033|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d1b63b1d4a452317", "measure_id": "200800033", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Ana Charter be amended to change Councilmember term limits to three terms; require the City Council to adopt a Code of Ethics and Conduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, and committees to assure public confidence in the integrity of local government elected and appointed officials and to adopt such Code within six months of the effective date of this charter section? Charter Sections 401 and 401.05.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18969, "no_votes": 16195, "total_votes": 35164, "percent_yes": 53.944373, "percent_no": 46.055627, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.246889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.302144", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Ana Charter be amended to change Councilmember term limits to three terms; require the City Council to adopt a Code of Ethics and Conduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, and committees to assure public confidence in the integrity of local government elected and appointed officials and to adopt such Code within six months of the effective date of this charter section? Charter Sections 401 and 401.05.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7077, "fingerprint": "2008|200800034|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800034|ORANGE", "content_hash": "dedaa7910a964d61", "measure_id": "200800034", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In the event Measure D is approved, shall the Santa Ana Charter be amended to make board and commission terms correspond with those of the City Council? Charter Section 901.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18743, "no_votes": 15888, "total_votes": 34631, "percent_yes": 54.12203, "percent_no": 45.87797, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.247151", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.302335", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In the event Measure D is approved, shall the Santa Ana Charter be amended to make board and commission terms correspond with those of the City Council? Charter Section 901.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7081, "fingerprint": "2008|200800195|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800195|ORANGE", "content_hash": "adedf016cce9be24", "measure_id": "200800195", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide Santa Ana Unified School District students with competitive classrooms and school facilities, improve student health/safety, qualify for $120,000,000 in State funds, shall Santa Ana Unified School District repair, renovate, acquire, construct and equip classrooms, science labs, sites, school facilities, including repair aging roofs, plumbing, heating/ventilation systems, electrical wiring, fire, security equipment and earthquake safety systems, and replace aging trailers with modern classrooms by issuing $200,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8426, "no_votes": 3818, "total_votes": 12244, "percent_yes": 68.81738, "percent_no": 31.18262, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.248326", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.303108", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide Santa Ana Unified School District students with competitive classrooms and school facilities, improve student health/safety, qualify for $120,000,000 in State funds, shall Santa Ana Unified School District repair, renovate, acquire, construct and equip classrooms, science labs, sites, school facilities, including repair aging roofs, plumbing, heating/ventilation systems, electrical wiring, fire, security equipment and earthquake safety systems, and replace aging trailers with modern classrooms by issuing $200,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7079, "fingerprint": "2008|200800145|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800145|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9654e9671f426452", "measure_id": "200800145", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to prohibit the Mayor and the members of the City Council, and their Executive Assistants and appointed Commissioners, from (1) engaging in compensated employment of service for lobbying for any private person or organization before any local public agency located in the County of Orange, and (2) having a personal investment or monetary interest in city contracts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14718, "no_votes": 3473, "total_votes": 18191, "percent_yes": 80.90814400000001, "percent_no": 19.091855999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.247762", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.302721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to prohibit the Mayor and the members of the City Council, and their Executive Assistants and appointed Commissioners, from (1) engaging in compensated employment of service for lobbying for any private person or organization before any local public agency located in the County of Orange, and (2) having a personal investment or monetary interest in city contracts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7080, "fingerprint": "2008|200800146|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800146|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1951f25b75eb331b", "measure_id": "200800146", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1319, which (1) limits residential building heights to 16 feet on designated lots that significantly impact ocean views within the Shorecliffs' neighborhood (subject to exceptions for certain lots that do not significantly impact views) and (2) allows reductions in building setback requirements and increases in maximum lot coverage for the lots affected by the reduced building height limits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7789, "no_votes": 3565, "total_votes": 11354, "percent_yes": 68.601376, "percent_no": 31.398623999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.248059", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.302912", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1319, which (1) limits residential building heights to 16 feet on designated lots that significantly impact ocean views within the Shorecliffs' neighborhood (subject to exceptions for certain lots that do not significantly impact views) and (2) allows reductions in building setback requirements and increases in maximum lot coverage for the lots affected by the reduced building height limits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7084, "fingerprint": "2008|200800236|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800236|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b724fd3139fd2851", "measure_id": "200800236", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the County Charter to require voter approval for certain increases in retirement benefits for County employees and officials be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 768374, "no_votes": 253331, "total_votes": 1021705, "percent_yes": 75.205076, "percent_no": 24.794923999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.249152", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.303782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the County Charter to require voter approval for certain increases in retirement benefits for County employees and officials be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7099, "fingerprint": "2008|200800516|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800516|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0c4eccd79e2fdf60", "measure_id": "200800516", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent local schools, improve educational opportunities and ensure students gain the skills needed to succeed, shall Los Alamitos Unified School District repair, upgrade, and equip outdated classrooms, science labs, libraries, restrooms, and technology and construct additional facilities by issuing $126,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13740, "no_votes": 7275, "total_votes": 21015, "percent_yes": 65.38186999999999, "percent_no": 34.61813000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.254806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.307050", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent local schools, improve educational opportunities and ensure students gain the skills needed to succeed, shall Los Alamitos Unified School District repair, upgrade, and equip outdated classrooms, science labs, libraries, restrooms, and technology and construct additional facilities by issuing $126,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7102, "fingerprint": "2008|200800519|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800519|ORANGE", "content_hash": "788af47010143d70", "measure_id": "200800519", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student learning, provide safe and modern schools, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Tustin Unified School District repair/replace deteriorated roofs, plumbing, lighting and electrical systems, modernize science labs, upgrade educational technology in classrooms and libraries, improve school safety-security, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, and upgrade inadequate classrooms/school facilities, by issuing $95,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, independent oversight, no administrator salaries, and all funds benefitting Tustin neighborhood schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18304, "no_votes": 12962, "total_votes": 31266, "percent_yes": 58.542824, "percent_no": 41.457176, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.255772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.307625", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student learning, provide safe and modern schools, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Tustin Unified School District repair/replace deteriorated roofs, plumbing, lighting and electrical systems, modernize science labs, upgrade educational technology in classrooms and libraries, improve school safety-security, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, and upgrade inadequate classrooms/school facilities, by issuing $95,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, independent oversight, no administrator salaries, and all funds benefitting Tustin neighborhood schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7098, "fingerprint": "2008|200800515|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800515|ORANGE", "content_hash": "919cab9eb1c17597", "measure_id": "200800515", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student learning and safety in neighborhood schools, shall Cypress School District rehabilitate 40-year old classrooms and school facilities, upgrade fire/safety/security systems, repair or replace aging roofs, restrooms, plumbing, electrical, heating, and ventilation, improve classroom teaching tools/equipment, and upgrade technology; by issuing $53,600,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with mandatory audits, independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting Cypress elementary schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12493, "no_votes": 5552, "total_votes": 18045, "percent_yes": 69.23247599999999, "percent_no": 30.76752400000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.254399", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.306857", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student learning and safety in neighborhood schools, shall Cypress School District rehabilitate 40-year old classrooms and school facilities, upgrade fire/safety/security systems, repair or replace aging roofs, restrooms, plumbing, electrical, heating, and ventilation, improve classroom teaching tools/equipment, and upgrade technology; by issuing $53,600,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with mandatory audits, independent oversight, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds benefiting Cypress elementary schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7101, "fingerprint": "2008|200800518|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800518|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1ec2792cfe8799be", "measure_id": "200800518", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student learning and safety in neighborhood schools, shall Savanna Elementary School District rehabilitate 46-50-year old classrooms and school facilitates, upgrade fire/safety/security systems, repair or replace deteriorated roofs, electrical, plumbing, restrooms, heating, and ventilation, and improve classroom technology and school libraries; by issuing $24,935,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with independent citizens' oversight, mandatory audits, no administrator salaries, and all funds benefitting Savanna elementary schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5728, "no_votes": 2172, "total_votes": 7900, "percent_yes": 72.506326, "percent_no": 27.493674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.255427", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.307433", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student learning and safety in neighborhood schools, shall Savanna Elementary School District rehabilitate 46-50-year old classrooms and school facilitates, upgrade fire/safety/security systems, repair or replace deteriorated roofs, electrical, plumbing, restrooms, heating, and ventilation, and improve classroom technology and school libraries; by issuing $24,935,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with independent citizens' oversight, mandatory audits, no administrator salaries, and all funds benefitting Savanna elementary schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7103, "fingerprint": "2008|200800520|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800520|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ff63f575dce747a2", "measure_id": "200800520", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health/safety and recruit/retain teachers at elementary/middle schools by improving student safety at drop-off zones, upgrading computer technology, math/science labs and energy efficiency, installing emergency communication systems, expanding after-school tutoring/mentoring space, replacing outdated bathroom plumbing, and achieving eligibility for grant funding, shall Westminster School District issue $130,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, requiring Independent Citizens' Oversight, audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15947, "no_votes": 9374, "total_votes": 25321, "percent_yes": 62.979347, "percent_no": 37.020653, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.256095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.307816", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health/safety and recruit/retain teachers at elementary/middle schools by improving student safety at drop-off zones, upgrading computer technology, math/science labs and energy efficiency, installing emergency communication systems, expanding after-school tutoring/mentoring space, replacing outdated bathroom plumbing, and achieving eligibility for grant funding, shall Westminster School District issue $130,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, requiring Independent Citizens' Oversight, audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7086, "fingerprint": "2008|200800371|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800371|ORANGE", "content_hash": "5aebf51a1f690382", "measure_id": "200800371", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Charter be adopted making the City of Buena Park a charter city- instead of remaining a general law city- so the City of Buena Park , rather than the State, has more control over its municipal affairs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13129, "no_votes": 9307, "total_votes": 22436, "percent_yes": 58.517563, "percent_no": 41.482437, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.249721", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.304163", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Charter be adopted making the City of Buena Park a charter city- instead of remaining a general law city- so the City of Buena Park , rather than the State, has more control over its municipal affairs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7087, "fingerprint": "2008|200800372|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800372|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1a6ce8cf14a124e3", "measure_id": "200800372", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the City of Garden Grove's term limits requirements to allow a City Council Member who has served two (2) consecutive terms in that office to run for the office of City Council Member after a two (2) year absence, instead of the current four (4) year absence, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22365, "no_votes": 22344, "total_votes": 44709, "percent_yes": 50.023484, "percent_no": 49.976516, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.250075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.304353", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the City of Garden Grove's term limits requirements to allow a City Council Member who has served two (2) consecutive terms in that office to run for the office of City Council Member after a two (2) year absence, instead of the current four (4) year absence, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7085, "fingerprint": "2008|200800237|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800237|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d8169e4b8709e05b", "measure_id": "200800237", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to ratify and implement certain policies relating to the Orange County Great Park project with regard to the governing structures and responsibilities of the City of Irvine and the Orange County Great Park Corporation, funding and construction, operation and maintenance considerations, and major policies and programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39056, "no_votes": 30828, "total_votes": 69884, "percent_yes": 55.8869, "percent_no": 44.1131, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.249416", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.303973", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to ratify and implement certain policies relating to the Orange County Great Park project with regard to the governing structures and responsibilities of the City of Irvine and the Orange County Great Park Corporation, funding and construction, operation and maintenance considerations, and major policies and programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7088, "fingerprint": "2008|200800373|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800373|ORANGE", "content_hash": "eded81617b50b9f1", "measure_id": "200800373", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to protect individual privacy interests and guide the City in its determinations on a case-by-case basis whether to disclose or to withhold individuals' personal information upon a public request for such information where the information is requested by the City for a limited specific purpose and with the representation that the information will be maintained in confidence?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45425, "no_votes": 25863, "total_votes": 71288, "percent_yes": 63.7204, "percent_no": 36.2796, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.250341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.304552", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to protect individual privacy interests and guide the City in its determinations on a case-by-case basis whether to disclose or to withhold individuals' personal information upon a public request for such information where the information is requested by the City for a limited specific purpose and with the representation that the information will be maintained in confidence?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7089, "fingerprint": "2008|200800374|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800374|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4e5be340f435b16d", "measure_id": "200800374", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain funding for essential City programs including household hazardous waste; natural disaster preparedness; skilled 9-1-1 dispatch/police officers; youth anti-gang/anti-drug programs; street paving, sidewalk/pothole repair; senior/disabled transportation and meals-on-wheels services; graffiti removal; storm drain maintenance to prevent pollution; and other general city services; shall the City sales tax be increased by one-half cent requiring annual independent financial audits, public expenditure reports, expiring after 20 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9855, "no_votes": 8145, "total_votes": 18000, "percent_yes": 54.75, "percent_no": 45.25, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.250608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.304744", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain funding for essential City programs including household hazardous waste; natural disaster preparedness; skilled 9-1-1 dispatch/police officers; youth anti-gang/anti-drug programs; street paving, sidewalk/pothole repair; senior/disabled transportation and meals-on-wheels services; graffiti removal; storm drain maintenance to prevent pollution; and other general city services; shall the City sales tax be increased by one-half cent requiring annual independent financial audits, public expenditure reports, expiring after 20 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7090, "fingerprint": "2008|200800375|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800375|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6a365801d0b1b3ca", "measure_id": "200800375", "measure_letter": "U-A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Order adopted on May 22, 2008, by the Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering the incorporation of the terrority described and designated in the Order as the City of Rossmoor be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Order, including a utility users tax as described in the Order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1746, "no_votes": 4412, "total_votes": 6158, "percent_yes": 28.35336, "percent_no": 71.64664, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.250872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.304940", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Order adopted on May 22, 2008, by the Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering the incorporation of the terrority described and designated in the Order as the City of Rossmoor be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Order, including a utility users tax as described in the Order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11597, "fingerprint": "2008|200800376|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800376|ORANGE", "content_hash": "11c4f7f67ccb680f", "measure_id": "200800376", "measure_letter": "U-B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Rossmoor City Council levy and collect a utility users tax on electricity, natural gas and water of 7% to fund general City services, including, but not limited to, police, street maintenance, senior citizen, library and parks and recreation services as described in the Order adopted on May 22, 2008 by the Local Agency Formation Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1763, "no_votes": 4244, "total_votes": 6007, "percent_yes": 29.349092, "percent_no": 70.650908, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.315694", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.251138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.305134", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Rossmoor City Council levy and collect a utility users tax on electricity, natural gas and water of 7% to fund general City services, including, but not limited to, police, street maintenance, senior citizen, library and parks and recreation services as described in the Order adopted on May 22, 2008 by the Local Agency Formation Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11598, "fingerprint": "2008|200800377|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800377|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3ff49ca913e363f4", "measure_id": "200800377", "measure_letter": "U-C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Rossmoor City Council levy and collect a utility users tax on electricity, natural gas and water of 9% to fund general City services, including, but not limited to, police, street maintenance, senior citizen, library and parks and recreation services as described in the Order adopted on May 22, 2008 by the Local Agency Formation Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1204, "no_votes": 4775, "total_votes": 5979, "percent_yes": 20.137146, "percent_no": 79.862854, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.315887", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.251410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.305326", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Rossmoor City Council levy and collect a utility users tax on electricity, natural gas and water of 9% to fund general City services, including, but not limited to, police, street maintenance, senior citizen, library and parks and recreation services as described in the Order adopted on May 22, 2008 by the Local Agency Formation Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7091, "fingerprint": "2008|200800378|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800378|ORANGE", "content_hash": "aa8fa5d912a0b05e", "measure_id": "200800378", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the Land Use Element of the City of San Clemente General Plan to require City voter approval of General Plan Amendments, Specific Plan Amendments, Specific Plan adoptions and Zoning Amendments that change the permitted uses of open space lands to non-open space uses be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20486, "no_votes": 8056, "total_votes": 28542, "percent_yes": 71.77493, "percent_no": 28.225070000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.251708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.305517", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the Land Use Element of the City of San Clemente General Plan to require City voter approval of General Plan Amendments, Specific Plan Amendments, Specific Plan adoptions and Zoning Amendments that change the permitted uses of open space lands to non-open space uses be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7092, "fingerprint": "2008|200800379|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800379|ORANGE", "content_hash": "120b8bd2d6d19401", "measure_id": "200800379", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City approve the LAB North Beach project, with Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, consisting of retail and restaurant uses, and public areas on City-owned property, including the triangular North Beach parking lot area, subject to: conforming to North Beach Parking and Traffic Master Plans, City scenic view policies, and land sale price based on City-approved direction?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15726, "no_votes": 13734, "total_votes": 29460, "percent_yes": 53.38085, "percent_no": 46.61915, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.252015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.305706", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City approve the LAB North Beach project, with Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, consisting of retail and restaurant uses, and public areas on City-owned property, including the triangular North Beach parking lot area, subject to: conforming to North Beach Parking and Traffic Master Plans, City scenic view policies, and land sale price based on City-approved direction?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7093, "fingerprint": "2008|200800380|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800380|ORANGE", "content_hash": "12abf96ebabc175a", "measure_id": "200800380", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the voters of the City of San Juan Capistrano adopt and ordinance adding section 9-2.104 to the Municipal Code requiring that any pending or future proposed General Plan designation change for any land presently designated as \"Open Space\" in the City's General Plan to another allowable use shall not become legally effective unless the proposed General Plan change is approved by the city electorate at a special or general city election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10556, "no_votes": 2839, "total_votes": 13395, "percent_yes": 78.805524, "percent_no": 21.194475999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.252381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.305896", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the voters of the City of San Juan Capistrano adopt and ordinance adding section 9-2.104 to the Municipal Code requiring that any pending or future proposed General Plan designation change for any land presently designated as \"Open Space\" in the City's General Plan to another allowable use shall not become legally effective unless the proposed General Plan change is approved by the city electorate at a special or general city election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7094, "fingerprint": "2008|200800381|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800381|ORANGE", "content_hash": "7edf7d3f15462af6", "measure_id": "200800381", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To acquire and improve land to protect and preserve open space, natural areas, creeks and streams, historic areas, undeveloped hillsides and natural ridges from potential residential and commercial development and to provide additional recreational amenities such as bike and walking trails, equestrian facilities, parks and sports fields, shall the City of San Juan Capistrano issue 30 million dollars in bonds, at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent audits, public expenditure review and no money for City administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9618, "no_votes": 4072, "total_votes": 13690, "percent_yes": 70.25565999999999, "percent_no": 29.744340000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.252908", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.306086", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire and improve land to protect and preserve open space, natural areas, creeks and streams, historic areas, undeveloped hillsides and natural ridges from potential residential and commercial development and to provide additional recreational amenities such as bike and walking trails, equestrian facilities, parks and sports fields, shall the City of San Juan Capistrano issue 30 million dollars in bonds, at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent audits, public expenditure review and no money for City administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7095, "fingerprint": "2008|200800382|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800382|ORANGE", "content_hash": "16cec75d7534c153", "measure_id": "200800382", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Seal Beach Municipal Code be amended to limit the maximum height of residential development in the Old Town Area to 25 feet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10441, "no_votes": 3976, "total_votes": 14417, "percent_yes": 72.42145, "percent_no": 27.578550000000007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.253310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.306283", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Seal Beach Municipal Code be amended to limit the maximum height of residential development in the Old Town Area to 25 feet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7106, "fingerprint": "2008|200800071|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800071|PLACER", "content_hash": "137a2949fbdd9de5", "measure_id": "200800071", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of our local elementary and middle schools, modernize classroom technology, construct new science and computer labs, improve school security, build new schools and classrooms and become eligible for millions in additional state school construction grants, shall the Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District issue $67.3 million in bonds at lawful interest rates with all expenditures audited and reviewed by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and providing no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5405, "no_votes": 5107, "total_votes": 10512, "percent_yes": 51.41743, "percent_no": 48.58257, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.257047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.308391", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of our local elementary and middle schools, modernize classroom technology, construct new science and computer labs, improve school security, build new schools and classrooms and become eligible for millions in additional state school construction grants, shall the Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District issue $67.3 million in bonds at lawful interest rates with all expenditures audited and reviewed by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and providing no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7107, "fingerprint": "2008|200800072|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800072|PLACER", "content_hash": "d5898f193306d202", "measure_id": "200800072", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve child safety and classroom learning environments by renovating our schools, including: removing asbestos and lead, upgrading faulty old fire safety equipment, electrical and plumbing systems and bathrooms, repairing leaky roofs, upgrading technology infrastructure, building two new multi-purpose rooms, and making schools legally handicap accessible, shall the District issue $17,700,000 in bonds, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, annual independent audits, with no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4148, "no_votes": 3744, "total_votes": 7892, "percent_yes": 52.559555, "percent_no": 47.440445, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.257373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.308600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve child safety and classroom learning environments by renovating our schools, including: removing asbestos and lead, upgrading faulty old fire safety equipment, electrical and plumbing systems and bathrooms, repairing leaky roofs, upgrading technology infrastructure, building two new multi-purpose rooms, and making schools legally handicap accessible, shall the District issue $17,700,000 in bonds, requiring citizens\u2019 oversight, annual independent audits, with no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7104, "fingerprint": "2008|200800035|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800035|PLACER", "content_hash": "f08fd106a53cc05d", "measure_id": "200800035", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 2007-245 previously passed by the City Council approving a General Plan Amendment reducing allowed acreage for residential development of Clover Valley from 504 to 199 acres, and increasing the acres designated for open space from 70 to 366 acres, and reconfiguring Valley View Parkway from a 4-lane facility to a 2-lane facility be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9841, "no_votes": 8503, "total_votes": 18344, "percent_yes": 53.64697, "percent_no": 46.35303, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.256412", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.308006", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 2007-245 previously passed by the City Council approving a General Plan Amendment reducing allowed acreage for residential development of Clover Valley from 504 to 199 acres, and increasing the acres designated for open space from 70 to 366 acres, and reconfiguring Valley View Parkway from a 4-lane facility to a 2-lane facility be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7105, "fingerprint": "2008|200800036|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800036|PLACER", "content_hash": "60f85207fe6d47f3", "measure_id": "200800036", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue current efforts to keep park and recreation facilities safe, clean and well maintained, shall Rocklin City Ordinance No. 926 be approved which would allow the City to continue to collect a per parcel fee; such fee would be between $10.00 and $45.00 per year, adjusted annually for inflation, for a period of fifteen years to be used only for park maintenance and development?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10772, "no_votes": 7414, "total_votes": 18186, "percent_yes": 59.23237999999999, "percent_no": 40.76762000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.256744", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.308199", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue current efforts to keep park and recreation facilities safe, clean and well maintained, shall Rocklin City Ordinance No. 926 be approved which would allow the City to continue to collect a per parcel fee; such fee would be between $10.00 and $45.00 per year, adjusted annually for inflation, for a period of fifteen years to be used only for park maintenance and development?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7108, "fingerprint": "2008|200800120|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800120|PLACER", "content_hash": "06e51fb66fc147d0", "measure_id": "200800120", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Northstar Community Services District be authorized to levy a special tax for the NCSD Fuels Management Program on all real properties within the District in the sum of $209.03, provided said special tax may be adjusted annually, beginning on July 1, 2009, using the Consumer Price Index for San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose.  Said tax is to be collected with Placer County General Taxes commencing with the forthcoming 2008/2009 fiscal year and continuing each year thereafter.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57, "no_votes": 36, "total_votes": 93, "percent_yes": 61.290324, "percent_no": 38.709676, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.257695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.308802", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Northstar Community Services District be authorized to levy a special tax for the NCSD Fuels Management Program on all real properties within the District in the sum of $209.03, provided said special tax may be adjusted annually, beginning on July 1, 2009, using the Consumer Price Index for San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose.  Said tax is to be collected with Placer County General Taxes commencing with the forthcoming 2008/2009 fiscal year and continuing each year thereafter.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7109, "fingerprint": "2008|200800196|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800196|PLACER", "content_hash": "6ba7e534265f77df", "measure_id": "200800196", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve energy efficiency, replace portable classrooms, upgrade computer and instructional technology, expand career and vocational classrooms, meet seismic safety and snow load requirements, shall Facilities Improvement District No.1 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District issue $93,530,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip Truckee area schools, sites and facilities, with required independent public financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 278, "no_votes": 221, "total_votes": 499, "percent_yes": 55.711424, "percent_no": 44.288576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.257993", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.308993", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve energy efficiency, replace portable classrooms, upgrade computer and instructional technology, expand career and vocational classrooms, meet seismic safety and snow load requirements, shall Facilities Improvement District No.1 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District issue $93,530,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip Truckee area schools, sites and facilities, with required independent public financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7115, "fingerprint": "2008|200800524|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800524|PLACER", "content_hash": "490e83973c084cb4", "measure_id": "200800524", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $475 million in bonds at the lowest available interest rates to improve student academic performance by building classrooms, facilities and labs throughout the district including for teaching green technologies; nursing and health care programs; architecture, engineering and construction management; computer sciences; early childhood development; and fire and police public safety programs at the American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College campuses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 69, "no_votes": 127, "total_votes": 196, "percent_yes": 35.204083000000004, "percent_no": 64.795917, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.259854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.310198", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $475 million in bonds at the lowest available interest rates to improve student academic performance by building classrooms, facilities and labs throughout the district including for teaching green technologies; nursing and health care programs; architecture, engineering and construction management; computer sciences; early childhood development; and fire and police public safety programs at the American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College campuses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7113, "fingerprint": "2008|200800522|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800522|PLACER", "content_hash": "cdab2c551baa0e2b", "measure_id": "200800522", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, including building new schools and classrooms to reduce student overcrowding, improving existing schools for greater energy efficiency and increased access to computers and technology, and qualify the District for approximately $250,000,000 in State funds, shall the District issue up to $500,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, no money for administrator salaries, and provided funds cannot be transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 155, "no_votes": 205, "total_votes": 360, "percent_yes": 43.055555, "percent_no": 56.944445, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.259232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.309798", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, including building new schools and classrooms to reduce student overcrowding, improving existing schools for greater energy efficiency and increased access to computers and technology, and qualify the District for approximately $250,000,000 in State funds, shall the District issue up to $500,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, no money for administrator salaries, and provided funds cannot be transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7114, "fingerprint": "2008|200800523|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800523|PLACER", "content_hash": "7728b3e417fc22d0", "measure_id": "200800523", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide comparable quality classrooms and technology as other nearby schools, update electrical systems to improve student access to computers/modern technology, construct a science/computer/vocational classroom laboratory to provide job skills, install solar panels to reduce utility costs, shall Colfax School District issue $2,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, to acquire, construct, repair, equip schools, with no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, independent public audits, and spending annually reviewed by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1320, "no_votes": 1143, "total_votes": 2463, "percent_yes": 53.593177, "percent_no": 46.406823, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.259529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.309992", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide comparable quality classrooms and technology as other nearby schools, update electrical systems to improve student access to computers/modern technology, construct a science/computer/vocational classroom laboratory to provide job skills, install solar panels to reduce utility costs, shall Colfax School District issue $2,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, to acquire, construct, repair, equip schools, with no money for administrators\u2019 salaries, independent public audits, and spending annually reviewed by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7110, "fingerprint": "2008|200800238|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800238|PLACER", "content_hash": "e72c39ea3e136252", "measure_id": "200800238", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article II, Section 207 of the Placer County Charter be amended to adjust the current $30,000.00 maximum compensation for Placer County Supervisors, put in place by the voters of Placer County in 1992, to a maximum of $48,000, effective January 1, 2009, with such amount adjusted each January 1 thereafter in accordance with a specially designated U.S. Department of Labor Consumer Price Index?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38398, "no_votes": 113354, "total_votes": 151752, "percent_yes": 25.303125, "percent_no": 74.696875, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.258281", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.309196", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article II, Section 207 of the Placer County Charter be amended to adjust the current $30,000.00 maximum compensation for Placer County Supervisors, put in place by the voters of Placer County in 1992, to a maximum of $48,000, effective January 1, 2009, with such amount adjusted each January 1 thereafter in accordance with a specially designated U.S. Department of Labor Consumer Price Index?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7111, "fingerprint": "2008|200800239|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800239|PLACER", "content_hash": "e5fce3b4e17df0fb", "measure_id": "200800239", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article V, Section 507 of the Placer County Charter be amended to change the terms of the County Counsel\u2019s employment from serving at the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors to employment consistent with state general law, which provides for a four year term and removal during that term for neglect of duty, malfeasance or misconduct in office, or other good cause shown?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86661, "no_votes": 62529, "total_votes": 149190, "percent_yes": 58.08767, "percent_no": 41.91233, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.258574", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.309393", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article V, Section 507 of the Placer County Charter be amended to change the terms of the County Counsel\u2019s employment from serving at the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors to employment consistent with state general law, which provides for a four year term and removal during that term for neglect of duty, malfeasance or misconduct in office, or other good cause shown?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7112, "fingerprint": "2008|200800521|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800521|PLACER", "content_hash": "072f2152cd80823c", "measure_id": "200800521", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Alta-Dutch Flat Union School District, in order to protect our neighborhood school\u2019s academic excellence, reduce state budget cut impacts, limit class size increases, preserve academic programs, materials, and facilities, and maintain local control, collect $45.00 per taxable parcel annually for four years beginning July 1, 2009, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 534, "no_votes": 454, "total_votes": 988, "percent_yes": 54.048586, "percent_no": 45.951414, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.258914", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.309597", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Alta-Dutch Flat Union School District, in order to protect our neighborhood school\u2019s academic excellence, reduce state budget cut impacts, limit class size increases, preserve academic programs, materials, and facilities, and maintain local control, collect $45.00 per taxable parcel annually for four years beginning July 1, 2009, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7116, "fingerprint": "2008|200800525|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800525|PLACER", "content_hash": "5966f92738131741", "measure_id": "200800525", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve energy efficiency, replace portable classrooms, upgrade computer/instructional technology, expand career/vocational classrooms, meet seismic safety/snow load requirements, shall Facilities Improvement District No.\u00a01 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District issue $93,530,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip Truckee area schools, sites, facilities, with independent financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and maintain 1999 voter approved tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 431, "no_votes": 453, "total_votes": 884, "percent_yes": 48.755655, "percent_no": 51.244345, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.260225", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.310391", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve energy efficiency, replace portable classrooms, upgrade computer/instructional technology, expand career/vocational classrooms, meet seismic safety/snow load requirements, shall Facilities Improvement District No.\u00a01 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District issue $93,530,000 of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair, equip Truckee area schools, sites, facilities, with independent financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries and maintain 1999 voter approved tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7117, "fingerprint": "2008|200800037|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800037|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "02c429dc60db882a", "measure_id": "200800037", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Title 19 of the Riverside Municipal Code be amended to reduce the keeping of crowing roosters (male chickens) to no more than seven (7) on any lot in the Residential Agricultural and Residential Conservation Zones provided that such roosters are housed from sunset to sunrise in an acoustical structure to reduce noise emitted by such roosters and such structure is at least 100 feet from any residential structure on an adjoining lot?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36938, "no_votes": 17695, "total_votes": 54633, "percent_yes": 67.61115, "percent_no": 32.388850000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.260546", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.310592", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Title 19 of the Riverside Municipal Code be amended to reduce the keeping of crowing roosters (male chickens) to no more than seven (7) on any lot in the Residential Agricultural and Residential Conservation Zones provided that such roosters are housed from sunset to sunrise in an acoustical structure to reduce noise emitted by such roosters and such structure is at least 100 feet from any residential structure on an adjoining lot?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7120, "fingerprint": "2008|200800073|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800073|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "85fe31554a6557cd", "measure_id": "200800073", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Menifee Union Elementary School District relieve overcrowding and improve education throughout the district by constructing two new elementary schools and a middle school to accommodate growth by issuing $31,460,000 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with citizen oversight, annual audits of expenditures and performance and no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9561, "no_votes": 7289, "total_votes": 16850, "percent_yes": 56.74184, "percent_no": 43.25816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.261471", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.311158", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Menifee Union Elementary School District relieve overcrowding and improve education throughout the district by constructing two new elementary schools and a middle school to accommodate growth by issuing $31,460,000 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with citizen oversight, annual audits of expenditures and performance and no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7118, "fingerprint": "2008|200800038|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800038|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f14f5eb6c9c2dcb2", "measure_id": "200800038", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order be adopted on August 23, 2007, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County ordering the incorporation of the terroritory described in the order, including detachments from the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District, County Service Areas 22, 103 and 142, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order designated as LAFCO 2005-107-1 & 3, be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4012, "no_votes": 2505, "total_votes": 6517, "percent_yes": 61.562070000000006, "percent_no": 38.437929999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.260869", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.310781", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order be adopted on August 23, 2007, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County ordering the incorporation of the terroritory described in the order, including detachments from the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District, County Service Areas 22, 103 and 142, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order designated as LAFCO 2005-107-1 & 3, be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7119, "fingerprint": "2008|200800039|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800039|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "33fbfefe40c09e49", "measure_id": "200800039", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of Wildomar in future elections be elected by district or at large? \"By District\" is coded as \"Yes\" and \"At Large\" is coded as \"No.\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3457, "no_votes": 2612, "total_votes": 6069, "percent_yes": 56.96160999999999, "percent_no": 43.03839000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.261155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.310970", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of Wildomar in future elections be elected by district or at large? \"By District\" is coded as \"Yes\" and \"At Large\" is coded as \"No.\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7121, "fingerprint": "2008|200800074|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800074|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2c9630587daf5c5d", "measure_id": "200800074", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade and renovate existing schools, improve access to computers and modern technology throughout the District, build new schools to relieve student overcrowding and maintain small class sizes, and make the District eligible for an estimated $125,000,000 in State matching grants, shall the Palm Springs Unified School District issue $516,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20923, "no_votes": 12724, "total_votes": 33647, "percent_yes": 62.18384999999999, "percent_no": 37.81615000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.261760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.311347", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade and renovate existing schools, improve access to computers and modern technology throughout the District, build new schools to relieve student overcrowding and maintain small class sizes, and make the District eligible for an estimated $125,000,000 in State matching grants, shall the Palm Springs Unified School District issue $516,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7123, "fingerprint": "2008|200800147|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800147|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4b4a51b0414fd207", "measure_id": "200800147", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on October 25, 2007, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order, including detachment from the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District, dissolution of County Service Areas 33, 86, 138 and 145 and detachments from County Service areas 43, 80, 84 and 146, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order designated as LAFCO 2007-40-3 & 5 be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7160, "no_votes": 4396, "total_votes": 11556, "percent_yes": 61.959153, "percent_no": 38.040847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.262448", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.311761", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on October 25, 2007, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order, including detachment from the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District, dissolution of County Service Areas 33, 86, 138 and 145 and detachments from County Service areas 43, 80, 84 and 146, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order designated as LAFCO 2007-40-3 & 5 be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11599, "fingerprint": "2008|200800527|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800527|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "192365325ed197a7", "measure_id": "200800527", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce overcrowding, improve every neighborhood school, attract quality teachers and qualify for state matching grants, build middle and high schools, improve libraries, science/computer labs, repair restrooms, increase security, after-school program and joint-use space, drop-off zone safety, and acquire, construct, repair equipment/sites/facilities, shall Colton Unified School District issue $225,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring citizen oversight, audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140, "no_votes": 122, "total_votes": 262, "percent_yes": 53.435117, "percent_no": 46.564883, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.323809", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.265349", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.313486", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce overcrowding, improve every neighborhood school, attract quality teachers and qualify for state matching grants, build middle and high schools, improve libraries, science/computer labs, repair restrooms, increase security, after-school program and joint-use space, drop-off zone safety, and acquire, construct, repair equipment/sites/facilities, shall Colton Unified School District issue $225,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring citizen oversight, audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7124, "fingerprint": "2008|200800148|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800148|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ba925ff59efdd0f1", "measure_id": "200800148", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of Menifee Valley in future elections be elected by district or at large? \"By District\" is coded as \"Yes\" and \"At Large\" is coded as \"No.\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5276, "no_votes": 5049, "total_votes": 10325, "percent_yes": 51.099277, "percent_no": 48.900723, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.262816", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.311957", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of Menifee Valley in future elections be elected by district or at large? \"By District\" is coded as \"Yes\" and \"At Large\" is coded as \"No.\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7125, "fingerprint": "2008|200800149|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800149|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8b58272791bc22bc", "measure_id": "200800149", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the city be called Menifee Valley or Menifee? \"Menifee\" is coded as \"Yes\" and \"Menifee Vallley\" is coded as \"No.\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5664, "no_votes": 5037, "total_votes": 10701, "percent_yes": 52.929634, "percent_no": 47.070366, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.263106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.312146", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city be called Menifee Valley or Menifee? \"Menifee\" is coded as \"Yes\" and \"Menifee Vallley\" is coded as \"No.\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7126, "fingerprint": "2008|200800197|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800197|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f9228de42a38e355", "measure_id": "200800197", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student learning and safety, relieve severe overcrowding, and qualify for $21,000,000 in State Matching funds, shall Val Verde Unified School District rehabilitate inadequate heating, ventilation, sewer, drainage and safety/security systems; upgrade school technology; replace portables with permanent classrooms; and renovate/acquire/construct/equip classrooms and schools, including Phase 1 of a new high school; by issuing $43,440,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, and all funds benefitting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2323, "no_votes": 1040, "total_votes": 3363, "percent_yes": 69.07523, "percent_no": 30.924769999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.263457", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.312335", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student learning and safety, relieve severe overcrowding, and qualify for $21,000,000 in State Matching funds, shall Val Verde Unified School District rehabilitate inadequate heating, ventilation, sewer, drainage and safety/security systems; upgrade school technology; replace portables with permanent classrooms; and renovate/acquire/construct/equip classrooms and schools, including Phase 1 of a new high school; by issuing $43,440,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, and all funds benefitting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7129, "fingerprint": "2008|200800387|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800387|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b1bec93c6ddc3470", "measure_id": "200800387", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that modernizes Utility User Tax definitions so that taxpayers are treated the same regardless of technology used, provides for an annual audit of all expenditures, preserves current senior and disabled exemptions, and applies to all technologies and telecommunication services, including intrastate, interstate and international calls and private communication services such as T-1, paging and text messaging?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10691, "no_votes": 5709, "total_votes": 16400, "percent_yes": 65.18902, "percent_no": 34.81098, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.264386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.312910", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that modernizes Utility User Tax definitions so that taxpayers are treated the same regardless of technology used, provides for an annual audit of all expenditures, preserves current senior and disabled exemptions, and applies to all technologies and telecommunication services, including intrastate, interstate and international calls and private communication services such as T-1, paging and text messaging?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7127, "fingerprint": "2008|200800385|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800385|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "9ebd71371170f5c6", "measure_id": "200800385", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect/preserve essential Cathedral City services including: police officers, firefighters, paramedics; 911 response times; crime, gang and drug prevention programs; fixing potholes and streets; improving graffiti removal, street sweeping, code enforcement, street medians and open space; funding youth and senior services; and preserving other general City services, shall Cathedral City establish a three percent utility users' tax, exempting low-income seniors, requiring citizens' finance advisory committee review and annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8742, "no_votes": 4052, "total_votes": 12794, "percent_yes": 68.32890499999999, "percent_no": 31.671095000000008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.263779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.312529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect/preserve essential Cathedral City services including: police officers, firefighters, paramedics; 911 response times; crime, gang and drug prevention programs; fixing potholes and streets; improving graffiti removal, street sweeping, code enforcement, street medians and open space; funding youth and senior services; and preserving other general City services, shall Cathedral City establish a three percent utility users' tax, exempting low-income seniors, requiring citizens' finance advisory committee review and annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7122, "fingerprint": "2008|200800075|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800075|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2a0f595529effdab", "measure_id": "200800075", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide vocational and technical programs, enhance nursing, firefighter, paramedic, public safety and hi-tech job training, repair, construct, acquire and equip classrooms, sites and facilities for science, technology, college transfer classes, vocational and technical training, modern buildings/libraries, shall San Bernadino Community College District issue $500 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens' oversight committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1108, "no_votes": 707, "total_votes": 1815, "percent_yes": 61.04683, "percent_no": 38.95317, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.262115", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.311569", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide vocational and technical programs, enhance nursing, firefighter, paramedic, public safety and hi-tech job training, repair, construct, acquire and equip classrooms, sites and facilities for science, technology, college transfer classes, vocational and technical training, modern buildings/libraries, shall San Bernadino Community College District issue $500 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens' oversight committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7128, "fingerprint": "2008|200800386|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800386|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "fe6d126418274ff0", "measure_id": "200800386", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To restore/maintain vital services: retain police officers/firefighters/paramedics; improve 9-1-1/disaster response; maintain anti-crime, gang/drug prevention programs; fix potholes/streets; restore library hours; reduce traffic congestion; fund youth/senior services; fund any City services/purposes shall the City of Hemet establish a 5 percent utility users tax, exempting low-income seniors, requiring annual financial audits, no tax rate increases without voter approval, with all funds legally required to benefit Hemet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13212, "no_votes": 10732, "total_votes": 23944, "percent_yes": 55.17875, "percent_no": 44.82125, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.264069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.312719", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore/maintain vital services: retain police officers/firefighters/paramedics; improve 9-1-1/disaster response; maintain anti-crime, gang/drug prevention programs; fix potholes/streets; restore library hours; reduce traffic congestion; fund youth/senior services; fund any City services/purposes shall the City of Hemet establish a 5 percent utility users tax, exempting low-income seniors, requiring annual financial audits, no tax rate increases without voter approval, with all funds legally required to benefit Hemet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7130, "fingerprint": "2008|200800388|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800388|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "9f13f1e7b561fe64", "measure_id": "200800388", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance be adopted to reduce the rate of Moreno Valley's existing utility users tax from 6% to 5.75% on all utility services (electricity, gas, telecommunication, video, water, and sewer) and modernize the telecommunications services definitions so that all telecommunications and video users are treated equally regardless of technology used while retaining existing exemptions for low-income residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36080, "no_votes": 9481, "total_votes": 45561, "percent_yes": 79.190534, "percent_no": 20.809466, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.264721", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.313102", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance be adopted to reduce the rate of Moreno Valley's existing utility users tax from 6% to 5.75% on all utility services (electricity, gas, telecommunication, video, water, and sewer) and modernize the telecommunications services definitions so that all telecommunications and video users are treated equally regardless of technology used while retaining existing exemptions for low-income residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7131, "fingerprint": "2008|200800526|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800526|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b5b0c1e686a00040", "measure_id": "200800526", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain/attract excellent teachers, keep students from gangs by upgrading safety, technology security systems, energy efficiency; acquiring land; repairing, constructing, equipping schools/classrooms; adding vocational education/after-school space; fixing leaky roofs; replacing heating/air-conditioning; and qualifying for State matching grants shall Beaumont Unified School District issue $125,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, Independent Citizens' Oversights, and no money for State or administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9028, "no_votes": 5523, "total_votes": 14551, "percent_yes": 62.043846, "percent_no": 37.956154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.265059", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.313293", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain/attract excellent teachers, keep students from gangs by upgrading safety, technology security systems, energy efficiency; acquiring land; repairing, constructing, equipping schools/classrooms; adding vocational education/after-school space; fixing leaky roofs; replacing heating/air-conditioning; and qualifying for State matching grants shall Beaumont Unified School District issue $125,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, Independent Citizens' Oversights, and no money for State or administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7132, "fingerprint": "2008|200800076|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800076|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "9258a7554bfe5fcf", "measure_id": "200800076", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": " To improve the quality of our local elementary and middle schools, modernize classroom technology, construct new science and computer labs, improve school security, build new schools and classrooms and become eligible for millions in additional state school construction grants, shall the Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District issue $67.3 million in bonds at lawful interest rates with all expenditures audited and reviewed by a citizens? oversight committee, and providing no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2877, "no_votes": 1245, "total_votes": 4122, "percent_yes": 69.796216, "percent_no": 30.203784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.265735", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.313678", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": " To improve the quality of our local elementary and middle schools, modernize classroom technology, construct new science and computer labs, improve school security, build new schools and classrooms and become eligible for millions in additional state school construction grants, shall the Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District issue $67.3 million in bonds at lawful interest rates with all expenditures audited and reviewed by a citizens? oversight committee, and providing no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7137, "fingerprint": "2008|200800529|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800529|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "8de03348f8454e55", "measure_id": "200800529", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $475,000,000 million in bonds at the lowest available interest rates to improve student academic performance by building classrooms, facilities and labs throughout the district including for teaching green technologies; nursing and healthcare programs; architecture, engineering and construction management; computer sciences; early childhood development; and fire and police public safety programs at the American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College campuses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 263876, "no_votes": 185252, "total_votes": 449128, "percent_yes": 58.75296, "percent_no": 41.24704, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.267344", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.314649", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $475,000,000 million in bonds at the lowest available interest rates to improve student academic performance by building classrooms, facilities and labs throughout the district including for teaching green technologies; nursing and healthcare programs; architecture, engineering and construction management; computer sciences; early childhood development; and fire and police public safety programs at the American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College campuses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7136, "fingerprint": "2008|200800528|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800528|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "adb65cf63212a4a8", "measure_id": "200800528", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, including building new schools and classrooms to reduce student overcrowding, improving existing schools for greater energy efficiency and increased access to computers and technology, and qualify the District for approximately $250,000,000 in State funds, shall the District issue up to $500,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, no money for administrator salaries, and provided funds cannot be transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4927, "no_votes": 2991, "total_votes": 7918, "percent_yes": 62.22531, "percent_no": 37.77469, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.267054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.314450", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, including building new schools and classrooms to reduce student overcrowding, improving existing schools for greater energy efficiency and increased access to computers and technology, and qualify the District for approximately $250,000,000 in State funds, shall the District issue up to $500,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, no money for administrator salaries, and provided funds cannot be transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7135, "fingerprint": "2008|200800390|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800390|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "00bc310489981d41", "measure_id": "200800390", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Utility User Tax ordinance be amended to reduce the tax on communications users from 7.5% to 7.0%; assure that users of current and future communications technologies be treated fairly; preserve funding for essential municipal services like police, fire protection and youth programs; continue providing tax refunds for low-income residents and requiring annual independent financial audits; and prohibit any tax-rate increase without voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92557, "no_votes": 50018, "total_votes": 142575, "percent_yes": 64.91811, "percent_no": 35.08189, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.266730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.314257", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Utility User Tax ordinance be amended to reduce the tax on communications users from 7.5% to 7.0%; assure that users of current and future communications technologies be treated fairly; preserve funding for essential municipal services like police, fire protection and youth programs; continue providing tax refunds for low-income residents and requiring annual independent financial audits; and prohibit any tax-rate increase without voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7134, "fingerprint": "2008|200800389|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800389|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "43c2071c3441f341", "measure_id": "200800389", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund police services, such as hiring additional officers, providing advanced training, expanding anti-gang/drug police activities, participating in the regional anti-drug task force, increasing neighborhood foot/bike patrols, increasing police presence at schools/parks, and removing graffiti, shall City of Galt Ordinance levying a transaction and use (sales) tax of \u00bd cent, with all funds staying in Galt, citizens\u2019 oversight and independent annual audits, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4978, "no_votes": 2342, "total_votes": 7320, "percent_yes": 68.005466, "percent_no": 31.994534, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.266405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.314057", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund police services, such as hiring additional officers, providing advanced training, expanding anti-gang/drug police activities, participating in the regional anti-drug task force, increasing neighborhood foot/bike patrols, increasing police presence at schools/parks, and removing graffiti, shall City of Galt Ordinance levying a transaction and use (sales) tax of \u00bd cent, with all funds staying in Galt, citizens\u2019 oversight and independent annual audits, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7133, "fingerprint": "2008|200800240|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800240|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "7a0cf56a45051265", "measure_id": "200800240", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Cosumnes Community Services District change the system in which Board members are elected from the current at-large electoral system, meaning Board members may reside anywhere in the jurisdiction and are elected by all voters within the District, to a system in which the Cosumnes Community Services District jurisdiction is divided into five equally- populated geographical divisions, with one Board member elected from each division by all voters within the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30584, "no_votes": 26530, "total_votes": 57114, "percent_yes": 53.549040000000005, "percent_no": 46.450959999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.266079", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.313867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Cosumnes Community Services District change the system in which Board members are elected from the current at-large electoral system, meaning Board members may reside anywhere in the jurisdiction and are elected by all voters within the District, to a system in which the Cosumnes Community Services District jurisdiction is divided into five equally- populated geographical divisions, with one Board member elected from each division by all voters within the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7143, "fingerprint": "2008|200800530|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800530|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "350ab85f239c0e17", "measure_id": "200800530", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; renovate and construct classrooms and educational facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for up to $50.0 million in State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (Coalinga Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $11.6 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 1, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.269356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.316112", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; renovate and construct classrooms and educational facilities; acquire land; improve energy efficiency; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; and make the District eligible for up to $50.0 million in State matching funds; shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (Coalinga Area) of the West Hills Community College District issue $11.6 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7138, "fingerprint": "2008|200800150|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800150|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "5650caafece7a7b6", "measure_id": "200800150", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing three-quarter of one percent (0.75%) City of San Juan Bautista General Fund Transactions and Use Tax approved in 2005 be replaced and increased with a one and one quarter percent (1.25%) General Fund Transactions and Use Tax (also known as a Sales and Use Tax), to be utilized for local general governmental purposes, the use by City of all revenue resulting from such increase to be subject to recommendations by an advisory panel to be appointed by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 211, "no_votes": 213, "total_votes": 424, "percent_yes": 49.76415, "percent_no": 50.23585, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.267629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.314843", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing three-quarter of one percent (0.75%) City of San Juan Bautista General Fund Transactions and Use Tax approved in 2005 be replaced and increased with a one and one quarter percent (1.25%) General Fund Transactions and Use Tax (also known as a Sales and Use Tax), to be utilized for local general governmental purposes, the use by City of all revenue resulting from such increase to be subject to recommendations by an advisory panel to be appointed by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7139, "fingerprint": "2008|200800198|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800198|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "ed5c04a46a6fa083", "measure_id": "200800198", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood schools and provide for student safety, health, and learning; to replace relocatable classrooms; to acquire, construct, upgrade and equip classrooms, restrooms, facilities and sites; and to retire an outstanding facilities loan, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $18,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates for Aromas-San Juan Unified school projects, not administrators' salaries or operating expenses, with citizens' oversight and independent public financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 632, "no_votes": 734, "total_votes": 1366, "percent_yes": 46.266472, "percent_no": 53.733528, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.268001", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.315036", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood schools and provide for student safety, health, and learning; to replace relocatable classrooms; to acquire, construct, upgrade and equip classrooms, restrooms, facilities and sites; and to retire an outstanding facilities loan, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $18,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates for Aromas-San Juan Unified school projects, not administrators' salaries or operating expenses, with citizens' oversight and independent public financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7141, "fingerprint": "2008|200800392|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800392|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "200800392", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 237, "no_votes": 468, "total_votes": 705, "percent_yes": 33.617023, "percent_no": 66.382977, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.268692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.315418", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7142, "fingerprint": "2008|200800393|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800393|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200800393", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 246, "no_votes": 457, "total_votes": 703, "percent_yes": 34.99289, "percent_no": 65.00711, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.268978", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.315764", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7140, "fingerprint": "2008|200800391|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800391|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "62690893af2577bd", "measure_id": "200800391", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Hollister?s Ordinance No. 979 regulating residential growth (adopted by the Hollister voters as Measure U in November 2004) be amended (by ordinance in substantially the form included in the election materials provided to qualified electors) to add an exemption allowing residential units in the Hollister Downtown Area, as described and depicted in the elections materials, to be constructed without any allocations or growth limitations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5263, "no_votes": 4842, "total_votes": 10105, "percent_yes": 52.08313, "percent_no": 47.91687, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.268323", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.315225", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Hollister?s Ordinance No. 979 regulating residential growth (adopted by the Hollister voters as Measure U in November 2004) be amended (by ordinance in substantially the form included in the election materials provided to qualified electors) to add an exemption allowing residential units in the Hollister Downtown Area, as described and depicted in the elections materials, to be constructed without any allocations or growth limitations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7149, "fingerprint": "2008|200800151|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800151|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "afe4030839670b00", "measure_id": "200800151", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Kelly J. Chastain be  recalled from the office of Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1548, "no_votes": 2549, "total_votes": 4097, "percent_yes": 37.783745, "percent_no": 62.216255, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.271333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.317494", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Kelly J. Chastain be  recalled from the office of Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7161, "fingerprint": "2008|200800532|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800532|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "cc54cd28151bed3e", "measure_id": "200800532", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Central School District improve, repair, replace, upgrade aging classrooms, restrooms, electrical systems, wiring, lighting, heating, ventilation, air conditioning systems and other school facilities/sites to meet current safety standards, provide emergency communication safety systems, computer/technology upgrades, construct/acquire facilities/equipment, replace outdated portable classrooms with permanent classrooms, by issuing $31,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators' salaries without increasing current tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9072, "no_votes": 3681, "total_votes": 12753, "percent_yes": 71.1362, "percent_no": 28.863799999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.275474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.320212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Central School District improve, repair, replace, upgrade aging classrooms, restrooms, electrical systems, wiring, lighting, heating, ventilation, air conditioning systems and other school facilities/sites to meet current safety standards, provide emergency communication safety systems, computer/technology upgrades, construct/acquire facilities/equipment, replace outdated portable classrooms with permanent classrooms, by issuing $31,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with independent oversight, no money for administrators' salaries without increasing current tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7159, "fingerprint": "2008|200800400|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800400|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "015d3bbd7c6024e7", "measure_id": "200800400", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 08-130 of the City of Victorville be adopted, increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel/motel tax) from seven percent (7%) to ten percent (10%), which is imposed upon transients, to fund general City services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14986, "no_votes": 9423, "total_votes": 24409, "percent_yes": 61.395390000000006, "percent_no": 38.604609999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.274887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.319853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 08-130 of the City of Victorville be adopted, increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel/motel tax) from seven percent (7%) to ten percent (10%), which is imposed upon transients, to fund general City services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7154, "fingerprint": "2008|200800394|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800394|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "129fb0913a08f09a", "measure_id": "200800394", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To hire enough new police officers/firefighters/paramedics to fight gangs/crime; shut down meth/drug hotspots; meet minimum firefighter/paramedic staffing levels; and acquire police, fire and emergency safety equipment, shall the City of Barstow enact a 3/4 cent transaction (sales) tax and use tax ordinance, requiring all funds generated to be spent on Barstow's fire, police and emergency protection/response with expenditures subject to annual independent audits and citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3346, "no_votes": 2526, "total_votes": 5872, "percent_yes": 56.98229, "percent_no": 43.01771, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.272848", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.318635", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To hire enough new police officers/firefighters/paramedics to fight gangs/crime; shut down meth/drug hotspots; meet minimum firefighter/paramedic staffing levels; and acquire police, fire and emergency safety equipment, shall the City of Barstow enact a 3/4 cent transaction (sales) tax and use tax ordinance, requiring all funds generated to be spent on Barstow's fire, police and emergency protection/response with expenditures subject to annual independent audits and citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7165, "fingerprint": "2008|200800536|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800536|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ca6c2e60d7622437", "measure_id": "200800536", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain safety/academics, attract excellent teachers; upgrade schools by repairing classrooms; upgrading technology, electrical systems; installing security cameras/door locks; improving pick-up/drop-off zone safety; increasing energy efficiency to reduce costs; equipping/acquiring sites, facilities/joint-use projects; building schools to relieve overcrowding; shall Victor Elementary School District qualify for State matching funds and issue $150,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens' oversight, audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15167, "no_votes": 7362, "total_votes": 22529, "percent_yes": 67.32212, "percent_no": 32.67788, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.276766", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.320948", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain safety/academics, attract excellent teachers; upgrade schools by repairing classrooms; upgrading technology, electrical systems; installing security cameras/door locks; improving pick-up/drop-off zone safety; increasing energy efficiency to reduce costs; equipping/acquiring sites, facilities/joint-use projects; building schools to relieve overcrowding; shall Victor Elementary School District qualify for State matching funds and issue $150,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring citizens' oversight, audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7162, "fingerprint": "2008|200800533|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800533|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ed3755008cf140ad", "measure_id": "200800533", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Colton Unified School District issue $225,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring citizen oversight, audits and no money for administrators' salaries to reduce overcrowding, improve every neighborhood school, attract quality teachers and qualify for state matching grants, build middle and high schools, improve libraries, science/computer labs, repair restrooms, increase security, after-school program and joint-use space, drop-off zone safety, and acquire, construct, repair equipment/sites/facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19501, "no_votes": 6972, "total_votes": 26473, "percent_yes": 73.663735, "percent_no": 26.336264999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.275793", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.320394", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Colton Unified School District issue $225,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, requiring citizen oversight, audits and no money for administrators' salaries to reduce overcrowding, improve every neighborhood school, attract quality teachers and qualify for state matching grants, build middle and high schools, improve libraries, science/computer labs, repair restrooms, increase security, after-school program and joint-use space, drop-off zone safety, and acquire, construct, repair equipment/sites/facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7158, "fingerprint": "2008|200800398|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800398|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c84cd4b1d20a16cc", "measure_id": "200800398", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve of the placement of a casino by the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe on part of a 300 acre parcel of tribal land located approximately four and one-half miles west of the City of Needles and adjacent to Interstate 40?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1063, "no_votes": 391, "total_votes": 1454, "percent_yes": 73.10867, "percent_no": 26.891329999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.274219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.319479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve of the placement of a casino by the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe on part of a 300 acre parcel of tribal land located approximately four and one-half miles west of the City of Needles and adjacent to Interstate 40?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11600, "fingerprint": "2008|200800399|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800399|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1ded49651342037d", "measure_id": "200800399", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council conduct a feasibility study and if the feasibility study demonstrates that the City of Needles can re-establish and operate its own police force at an acceptable level of service and at an acceptable cost which is equal to or less than the current and projected costs of contracting with the Sheriff\u2019s Department, shall the City Council be required to re-establish and operate its own police department?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 415, "no_votes": 1014, "total_votes": 1429, "percent_yes": 29.041287, "percent_no": 70.958713, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.330833", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.274550", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.319664", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council conduct a feasibility study and if the feasibility study demonstrates that the City of Needles can re-establish and operate its own police force at an acceptable level of service and at an acceptable cost which is equal to or less than the current and projected costs of contracting with the Sheriff\u2019s Department, shall the City Council be required to re-establish and operate its own police department?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7144, "fingerprint": "2008|200800007|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800007|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "11ffa991a72bf59f", "measure_id": "200800007", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on September 19, 2007, by the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of San Bernardino ordering the reorganization to include formation of the Phelan Pi\u00f1on Hills Community Services District, Detachment from County Service Area 56 and the Dissolution of County Service Area 9, County Service Area 56 Improvement Zone F-1, and County Service Area 70 Improvement Zones L and P-4, known as LAFCO 3070, be approved subject to the terms and conditions as more particularly described in the order?\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3636, "no_votes": 870, "total_votes": 4506, "percent_yes": 80.69241000000001, "percent_no": 19.30758999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.269708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.316332", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on September 19, 2007, by the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of San Bernardino ordering the reorganization to include formation of the Phelan Pi\u00f1on Hills Community Services District, Detachment from County Service Area 56 and the Dissolution of County Service Area 9, County Service Area 56 Improvement Zone F-1, and County Service Area 70 Improvement Zones L and P-4, known as LAFCO 3070, be approved subject to the terms and conditions as more particularly described in the order?\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7146, "fingerprint": "2008|200800077|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800077|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "7b8261f488700af0", "measure_id": "200800077", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, improve student safety and security of school campuses, and provide equitable high school facilities to improve educational opportunities for local students, shall Redlands Unified School District issue $65.5 million in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance the improvement, construction, and completion of school facilities, with strict accountability including annual audits and an independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures, and no money spent on administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21545, "no_votes": 10901, "total_votes": 32446, "percent_yes": 66.40264, "percent_no": 33.597359999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.270397", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.316789", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, improve student safety and security of school campuses, and provide equitable high school facilities to improve educational opportunities for local students, shall Redlands Unified School District issue $65.5 million in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance the improvement, construction, and completion of school facilities, with strict accountability including annual audits and an independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures, and no money spent on administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7166, "fingerprint": "2008|200800537|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800537|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ee8fa5ae43ce923e", "measure_id": "200800537", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education, prepare students for well-paying jobs and university transfer and qualify for State matching funds, shall Victor Valley Community College District improve classrooms, labs and educational buildings and establish a Workforce Training Center and Public Safety Academy for nursing, healthcare, emergency medical, police, firefighting and business careers, upgrade aging infrastructure, acquire sites, equipment, construct/repair buildings/science labs, by issuing $297,500,000 million in bonds, at legal rates with independent citizens\u2019 oversight/no money for administrators\u2019 salaries", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63532, "no_votes": 39683, "total_votes": 103215, "percent_yes": 61.55306699999999, "percent_no": 38.44693300000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.277092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.321128", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education, prepare students for well-paying jobs and university transfer and qualify for State matching funds, shall Victor Valley Community College District improve classrooms, labs and educational buildings and establish a Workforce Training Center and Public Safety Academy for nursing, healthcare, emergency medical, police, firefighting and business careers, upgrade aging infrastructure, acquire sites, equipment, construct/repair buildings/science labs, by issuing $297,500,000 million in bonds, at legal rates with independent citizens\u2019 oversight/no money for administrators\u2019 salaries", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7148, "fingerprint": "2008|200800079|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800079|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "fab3cf08b7467fd9", "measure_id": "200800079", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make all schools comparable and repair local schools by upgrading classrooms, libraries and technology, installing energy/water efficient improvements to reduce costs and conserve energy, qualifying for State matching funds, shall Upland Unified School District issue $103 million in bonds at legal interest rates to repair, construct acquire and equip schools, sites and facilities, appoint a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures, conduct annual audits, with no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11785, "no_votes": 7769, "total_votes": 19554, "percent_yes": 60.26899999999999, "percent_no": 39.73100000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.271045", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.317254", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make all schools comparable and repair local schools by upgrading classrooms, libraries and technology, installing energy/water efficient improvements to reduce costs and conserve energy, qualifying for State matching funds, shall Upland Unified School District issue $103 million in bonds at legal interest rates to repair, construct acquire and equip schools, sites and facilities, appoint a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures, conduct annual audits, with no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7145, "fingerprint": "2008|200800040|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800040|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "bf3d595a3eeee95f", "measure_id": "200800040", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance adding Chapter 3.46 to the Municipal Code be approved, reducing the existing service user\u2019s tax (utility user\u2019s tax) rate from 7.83% to 7.75% and modernizing the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22636, "no_votes": 5608, "total_votes": 28244, "percent_yes": 80.144453, "percent_no": 19.855547, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.270048", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.316560", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance adding Chapter 3.46 to the Municipal Code be approved, reducing the existing service user\u2019s tax (utility user\u2019s tax) rate from 7.83% to 7.75% and modernizing the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7147, "fingerprint": "2008|200800078|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800078|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2a0f595529effdab", "measure_id": "200800078", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide vocational and technical programs, enhance nursing, firefighter, paramedic, public safety and hi-tech job training, repair, construct, acquire and equip classrooms, sites and facilities for science, technology, college transfer classes, vocational and technical training, modern buildings/libraries, shall San Bernadino Community College District issue $500 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens' oversight committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86297, "no_votes": 42325, "total_votes": 128622, "percent_yes": 67.09349999999999, "percent_no": 32.90650000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.270717", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.317028", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide vocational and technical programs, enhance nursing, firefighter, paramedic, public safety and hi-tech job training, repair, construct, acquire and equip classrooms, sites and facilities for science, technology, college transfer classes, vocational and technical training, modern buildings/libraries, shall San Bernadino Community College District issue $500 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens' oversight committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7152, "fingerprint": "2008|200800199|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800199|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2ee4c7bea829784e", "measure_id": "200800199", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Needles Unified School District be authorized to modernize Vista Colorado Elementary School and Needles Middle School, provide the students and the community with a gymnasium at Needles Middle School, construct and replace facilities at Needles High School, and make health and safety improvements to all schools by issuing $10,900,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 623, "no_votes": 426, "total_votes": 1049, "percent_yes": 59.389895, "percent_no": 40.610105, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.272243", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.318177", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Needles Unified School District be authorized to modernize Vista Colorado Elementary School and Needles Middle School, provide the students and the community with a gymnasium at Needles Middle School, construct and replace facilities at Needles High School, and make health and safety improvements to all schools by issuing $10,900,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7150, "fingerprint": "2008|200800152|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800152|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b0d6ea00a58a5f04", "measure_id": "200800152", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Solely to provide funding to the Needles municipal hospital, shall the sales tax be increased by one-half percent, automatically expiring in 5 years; with funds deposited into a restricted account guaranteeing future administrations cannot use the money for other purposes; requiring annual financial audits; and no money for administrative overhead?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 489, "no_votes": 295, "total_votes": 784, "percent_yes": 62.372446, "percent_no": 37.627554, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.271647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.317724", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Solely to provide funding to the Needles municipal hospital, shall the sales tax be increased by one-half percent, automatically expiring in 5 years; with funds deposited into a restricted account guaranteeing future administrations cannot use the money for other purposes; requiring annual financial audits; and no money for administrative overhead?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7151, "fingerprint": "2008|200800153|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800153|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "5e8a8c91f32d1d5c", "measure_id": "200800153", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the city charter for the City of Victorville be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3810, "no_votes": 1776, "total_votes": 5586, "percent_yes": 68.20623, "percent_no": 31.793769999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.271959", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.317951", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city charter for the City of Victorville be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7153, "fingerprint": "2008|200800241|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800241|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1d9d1dc80600bf71", "measure_id": "200800241", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter of the County of San Bernardino be amended to establish a higher standard of ethics for staff members of County elected officers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 451087, "no_votes": 97825, "total_votes": 548912, "percent_yes": 82.17838400000001, "percent_no": 17.82161599999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.272528", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.318406", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the County of San Bernardino be amended to establish a higher standard of ethics for staff members of County elected officers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7157, "fingerprint": "2008|200800397|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800397|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "265b2d6d96ec203a", "measure_id": "200800397", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall approximately 1675 acres of land owned by the City of Loma Linda in the South Hills area be permanently preserved for open space and recreational uses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5995, "no_votes": 872, "total_votes": 6867, "percent_yes": 87.30158999999999, "percent_no": 12.69841000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.273932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.319301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall approximately 1675 acres of land owned by the City of Loma Linda in the South Hills area be permanently preserved for open space and recreational uses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7167, "fingerprint": "2008|200800538|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800538|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "7dad6680a3629ccd", "measure_id": "200800538", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make essential health/safety repairs, increase after-school program space to reduce juvenile violence, repair restrooms, leaking roofs/decaying walls, fire/security systems, upgrade technology, equipment and vocational classrooms, acquire property/build classrooms/schools to relieve severe overcrowding, and make schools eligible for state matching grants, shall Victor Valley Union High School District issue $500,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24037, "no_votes": 11363, "total_votes": 35400, "percent_yes": 67.90113, "percent_no": 32.098870000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.277420", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.321318", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make essential health/safety repairs, increase after-school program space to reduce juvenile violence, repair restrooms, leaking roofs/decaying walls, fire/security systems, upgrade technology, equipment and vocational classrooms, acquire property/build classrooms/schools to relieve severe overcrowding, and make schools eligible for state matching grants, shall Victor Valley Union High School District issue $500,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7164, "fingerprint": "2008|200800535|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800535|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4edfc0b52a04faac", "measure_id": "200800535", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, upgrade, acquire, equip and construct local school classrooms, upgrade electrical, heating, plumbing and fire safety systems, replace aging roofs, install energy efficient improvements, shall Rim of the World Unified School District be authorized to issue $23,340,000 of bonds, at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries and appoint an independent oversight committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8116, "no_votes": 5055, "total_votes": 13171, "percent_yes": 61.620224, "percent_no": 38.379776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.276450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.320768", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, upgrade, acquire, equip and construct local school classrooms, upgrade electrical, heating, plumbing and fire safety systems, replace aging roofs, install energy efficient improvements, shall Rim of the World Unified School District be authorized to issue $23,340,000 of bonds, at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries and appoint an independent oversight committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7163, "fingerprint": "2008|200800534|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800534|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "027268743688e58a", "measure_id": "200800534", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education, qualify for State matching funds, improve Helendale schools by upgrading security systems/electrical wiring/plumbing/technology, improving school pick-up/drop-off zone safety, building computer/science labs, middle school, kindergarten classrooms, fixing roofs, repairing/upgrading aging/outdated schools, acquiring property and improving Helendale Charter High School, shall Helendale School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, requiring Citizens\u2019 Oversight, independent annual audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1707, "no_votes": 800, "total_votes": 2507, "percent_yes": 68.08935000000001, "percent_no": 31.91064999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.276161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.320577", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education, qualify for State matching funds, improve Helendale schools by upgrading security systems/electrical wiring/plumbing/technology, improving school pick-up/drop-off zone safety, building computer/science labs, middle school, kindergarten classrooms, fixing roofs, repairing/upgrading aging/outdated schools, acquiring property and improving Helendale Charter High School, shall Helendale School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, requiring Citizens\u2019 Oversight, independent annual audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7155, "fingerprint": "2008|200800395|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800395|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "bf7948fbbcd870aa", "measure_id": "200800395", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the rate of the City\u2019s Transient Occupancy Tax (also known as Hotel Tax) charged to guests of private home rentals and any other overnight lodging facility from 6% to 7% as of January 1, 2009, and 7% to 8% as of January 1, 2010?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1503, "no_votes": 1009, "total_votes": 2512, "percent_yes": 59.832805, "percent_no": 40.167195, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.273140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.318861", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the rate of the City\u2019s Transient Occupancy Tax (also known as Hotel Tax) charged to guests of private home rentals and any other overnight lodging facility from 6% to 7% as of January 1, 2009, and 7% to 8% as of January 1, 2010?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7156, "fingerprint": "2008|200800396|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800396|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "43e5421b065f42f1", "measure_id": "200800396", "measure_letter": "YY", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the City\u2019s Transient occupancy Tax (also known as Hotel Tax) is increased from 6% to 8%, should the City solely allocate the additional revenue to rebuild and renovate infrastructure, streets, parks, trails, lake access points and other public facilities, and prohibit the additional revenue from being used for general City operations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1910, "no_votes": 530, "total_votes": 2440, "percent_yes": 78.27869, "percent_no": 21.721310000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.273471", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.319098", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the City\u2019s Transient occupancy Tax (also known as Hotel Tax) is increased from 6% to 8%, should the City solely allocate the additional revenue to rebuild and renovate infrastructure, streets, parks, trails, lake access points and other public facilities, and prohibit the additional revenue from being used for general City operations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7160, "fingerprint": "2008|200800531|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800531|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b5b0c1e686a00040", "measure_id": "200800531", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain/attract excellent teachers, keep students from gangs by upgrading safety, technology security systems, energy efficiency; acquiring land; repairing, constructing, equipping schools/classrooms; adding vocational education/after-school space; fixing leaky roofs; replacing heating/air-conditioning; and qualifying for State matching grants shall Beaumont Unified School District issue $125,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, Independent Citizens' Oversights, and no money for State or administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 1, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.275182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.320031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain/attract excellent teachers, keep students from gangs by upgrading safety, technology security systems, energy efficiency; acquiring land; repairing, constructing, equipping schools/classrooms; adding vocational education/after-school space; fixing leaky roofs; replacing heating/air-conditioning; and qualifying for State matching grants shall Beaumont Unified School District issue $125,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, Independent Citizens' Oversights, and no money for State or administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11606, "fingerprint": "2008|200800242|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800242|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "97e2d786fe011889", "measure_id": "200800242", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve wildfire prevention and firefighting capabilities, shall the County of San Diego ordinance be adopted to establish a special fire protection parcel tax and provide for the establishment of a Regional Fire Protection Agency to coordinate expenditures and regional efforts including: Specialized emergency equipment such as helicopters and airplanes; Wildfire training programs for emergency personnel; Communications systems to improve response times; and, Brush clearing and other programs to help prevent wildfires?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 717183, "no_votes": 410828, "total_votes": 1128011, "percent_yes": 63.579434, "percent_no": 36.420566, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.338249", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.281871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.323907", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve wildfire prevention and firefighting capabilities, shall the County of San Diego ordinance be adopted to establish a special fire protection parcel tax and provide for the establishment of a Regional Fire Protection Agency to coordinate expenditures and regional efforts including: Specialized emergency equipment such as helicopters and airplanes; Wildfire training programs for emergency personnel; Communications systems to improve response times; and, Brush clearing and other programs to help prevent wildfires?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11603, "fingerprint": "2008|200800158|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800158|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4cbbb5846f38d9e8", "measure_id": "200800158", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to exempt from the Managed Competition process the core public safety services provided by police officers, firefighters, and lifeguards who participate in the City's Safety Retirement System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 130108, "no_votes": 61368, "total_votes": 191476, "percent_yes": 67.95003, "percent_no": 32.04997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.337483", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.280649", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.323189", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to exempt from the Managed Competition process the core public safety services provided by police officers, firefighters, and lifeguards who participate in the City's Safety Retirement System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7168, "fingerprint": "2008|200800041|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800041|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "91135d3dc964c3bf", "measure_id": "200800041", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Land Use Plan of the City of Coronado Local Coastal Program be amended to require that prior to the construction or expansion of any permanent lifeguard facilities, restroom facilities, or bike paths on the Coronado Beach the City Council must first receive voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3084, "no_votes": 3461, "total_votes": 6545, "percent_yes": 47.11994, "percent_no": 52.88006, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.277737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.321510", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Land Use Plan of the City of Coronado Local Coastal Program be amended to require that prior to the construction or expansion of any permanent lifeguard facilities, restroom facilities, or bike paths on the Coronado Beach the City Council must first receive voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11604, "fingerprint": "2008|200800159|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800159|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "10904151b5f1ee43", "measure_id": "200800159", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the City Council to submit to voters at the June 2010 election Charter amendments making the Strong Mayor form of government permanent; adding a Council seat; and, when the ninth seat is filled, increasing the Council votes required to override a mayoral veto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 148672, "no_votes": 44887, "total_votes": 193559, "percent_yes": 76.809657, "percent_no": 23.190343, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.337682", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.280945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.323366", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the City Council to submit to voters at the June 2010 election Charter amendments making the Strong Mayor form of government permanent; adding a Council seat; and, when the ninth seat is filled, increasing the Council votes required to override a mayoral veto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7169, "fingerprint": "2008|200800042|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800042|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "19a8a52dfbca0ecd", "measure_id": "200800042", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In the event that Proposition A shall be approved by a majority of the voters of the city of Coronado, shall the construction of the lifeguard public safety service building at Coronado beach be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4431, "no_votes": 2086, "total_votes": 6517, "percent_yes": 67.991406, "percent_no": 32.008594, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.278072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.321692", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In the event that Proposition A shall be approved by a majority of the voters of the city of Coronado, shall the construction of the lifeguard public safety service building at Coronado beach be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11610, "fingerprint": "2008|200800409|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800409|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9d2335dd55a82fd4", "measure_id": "200800409", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended requiring that annual lease revenue generated in Mission Bay Park exceeding $23 million initially and decreasing to $20 million after 5 years be appropriated 75% for capital improvements in Mission Bay Park and 25% for capital improvements in Chollas Lake, Balboa, Mission Trails, Otay River Valley, Presidio and San Diego River Parks; open space parks; coastal beaches and contiguous coastal parks; and future regional parks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 300569, "no_votes": 148423, "total_votes": 448992, "percent_yes": 66.94306, "percent_no": 33.05694, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.339939", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.284862", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.325555", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended requiring that annual lease revenue generated in Mission Bay Park exceeding $23 million initially and decreasing to $20 million after 5 years be appropriated 75% for capital improvements in Mission Bay Park and 25% for capital improvements in Chollas Lake, Balboa, Mission Trails, Otay River Valley, Presidio and San Diego River Parks; open space parks; coastal beaches and contiguous coastal parks; and future regional parks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11605, "fingerprint": "2008|200800160|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800160|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f043b0de3b69edc2", "measure_id": "200800160", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to establish the positions, roles and responsibilities of the Chief Financial Officer, City Auditor, and Independent Budget Analyst; modify the City Treasurer appointment process; and create an Audit Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 122065, "no_votes": 71680, "total_votes": 193745, "percent_yes": 63.002914, "percent_no": 36.997086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.337873", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.281230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.323546", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to establish the positions, roles and responsibilities of the Chief Financial Officer, City Auditor, and Independent Budget Analyst; modify the City Treasurer appointment process; and create an Audit Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7171, "fingerprint": "2008|200800081|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800081|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "cd2f62d958c777be", "measure_id": "200800081", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe and modern school facilities, improve student learning, and qualify for approximately $20 million in State matching money, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2007-1 of the Poway Unified School District issue $179 million in bonds at legal interest rates to upgrade aging classrooms, libraries, science and computer labs; replace roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; improve fire alarms and school security; remove hazardous materials; fund needed facilities, subject to mandatory audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight and without an estimated increase in tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28323, "no_votes": 15995, "total_votes": 44318, "percent_yes": 63.90857, "percent_no": 36.09143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.278766", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.322049", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe and modern school facilities, improve student learning, and qualify for approximately $20 million in State matching money, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2007-1 of the Poway Unified School District issue $179 million in bonds at legal interest rates to upgrade aging classrooms, libraries, science and computer labs; replace roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; improve fire alarms and school security; remove hazardous materials; fund needed facilities, subject to mandatory audits, independent citizens\u2019 oversight and without an estimated increase in tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11611, "fingerprint": "2008|200800410|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800410|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a4909196c54ea11e", "measure_id": "200800410", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the People of the City of San Diego amend San Diego Municipal Code section 56.54 to make the consumption of alcohol unlawful at City beaches, Mission Bay Park, and coastal parks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 269481, "no_votes": 243808, "total_votes": 513289, "percent_yes": 52.50083, "percent_no": 47.49917, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.340124", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.285195", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.325736", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the People of the City of San Diego amend San Diego Municipal Code section 56.54 to make the consumption of alcohol unlawful at City beaches, Mission Bay Park, and coastal parks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11601, "fingerprint": "2008|200800154|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800154|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "79c66a81f8a6b425", "measure_id": "200800154", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Proposed City Charter of the City of Carlsbad be Adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14238, "no_votes": 3049, "total_votes": 17287, "percent_yes": 82.36247, "percent_no": 17.637529999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.336282", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.279378", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.322428", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Proposed City Charter of the City of Carlsbad be Adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7170, "fingerprint": "2008|200800080|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800080|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "cf8cff10a1d2e267", "measure_id": "200800080", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade and construct classrooms and joint use gymnasiums, increase access to computers and technology, replace 50-year old schools, make safety and security improvements, improve energy efficiency, and make the District eligible for State-matching grants, shall the Cajon Valley Union School District issue $156,500,000 of bonds at the lowest interest rates possible so long as no money is used for administrative salaries and spending is annually reviewed by an oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23696, "no_votes": 13250, "total_votes": 36946, "percent_yes": 64.13685, "percent_no": 35.863150000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.278421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.321870", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade and construct classrooms and joint use gymnasiums, increase access to computers and technology, replace 50-year old schools, make safety and security improvements, improve energy efficiency, and make the District eligible for State-matching grants, shall the Cajon Valley Union School District issue $156,500,000 of bonds at the lowest interest rates possible so long as no money is used for administrative salaries and spending is annually reviewed by an oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11602, "fingerprint": "2008|200800155|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800155|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b81f36b56ffc8062", "measure_id": "200800155", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending Chula Vista's General Plan to require voter approval for General Plan changes increasing allowable building heights above 84 feet in most areas of the City, and setting a building height limit of 45 feet in a designated area on Third Avenue be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12397, "no_votes": 13100, "total_votes": 25497, "percent_yes": 48.621407, "percent_no": 51.378593, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.336683", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.279708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.322642", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending Chula Vista's General Plan to require voter approval for General Plan changes increasing allowable building heights above 84 feet in most areas of the City, and setting a building height limit of 45 feet in a designated area on Third Avenue be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7172, "fingerprint": "2008|200800082|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800082|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "2ad1e9af17250e5f", "measure_id": "200800082", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide competitive educational facilities, reduce overcrowding, renovate playgrounds, improve campus safety, improve traffic circulation and provide technology upgrades, shall the Rancho Santa Fe School District issue $34 million of bonds at legal rates to repair, construct and equip new permanent and renovated facilities on the Rowe campus to replace aging and temporary classrooms, restrooms and administrative building, and before selling bonds appoint a Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee to perform financial audits and protect taxpayer interests?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2041, "no_votes": 837, "total_votes": 2878, "percent_yes": 70.91730000000001, "percent_no": 29.08269999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.279061", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.322239", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide competitive educational facilities, reduce overcrowding, renovate playgrounds, improve campus safety, improve traffic circulation and provide technology upgrades, shall the Rancho Santa Fe School District issue $34 million of bonds at legal rates to repair, construct and equip new permanent and renovated facilities on the Rowe campus to replace aging and temporary classrooms, restrooms and administrative building, and before selling bonds appoint a Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee to perform financial audits and protect taxpayer interests?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11607, "fingerprint": "2008|200800402|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800402|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7983eaa3e7a6f9fb", "measure_id": "200800402", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) For the purpose of preserving health care facilities in Coronado, should the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado purchase the hospital property from the Coronado Hospital Foundation for $20.1 million paid over a 15-year term and also provide a forgivable loan of $7 million for hospital capital projects to the Coronado Hospital Foundation, using funds borrowed from the City's General Fund reserve?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6602, "no_votes": 1839, "total_votes": 8441, "percent_yes": 78.213483, "percent_no": 21.786517000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.338625", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.282600", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.324264", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) For the purpose of preserving health care facilities in Coronado, should the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado purchase the hospital property from the Coronado Hospital Foundation for $20.1 million paid over a 15-year term and also provide a forgivable loan of $7 million for hospital capital projects to the Coronado Hospital Foundation, using funds borrowed from the City's General Fund reserve?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7173, "fingerprint": "2008|200800156|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800156|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a715ff2aa5be6ffd", "measure_id": "200800156", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved to amend Section 3.12.030 of the Encinitas Municipal Code to require guests of short term rental units (for 30 days or less) to pay 8% of the rent charged as a transient occupancy tax effective January 1, 2009?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6162, "no_votes": 4764, "total_votes": 10926, "percent_yes": 56.397580000000005, "percent_no": 43.602419999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.279995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.322828", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved to amend Section 3.12.030 of the Encinitas Municipal Code to require guests of short term rental units (for 30 days or less) to pay 8% of the rent charged as a transient occupancy tax effective January 1, 2009?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11608, "fingerprint": "2008|200800403|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800403|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "8b545095fae866f8", "measure_id": "200800403", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance approving the Garden Del Mar Specific Plan, as approved by the Del Mar City Council On August 4, 2008, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2181, "no_votes": 399, "total_votes": 2580, "percent_yes": 84.53488300000001, "percent_no": 15.465116999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.338813", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.282888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.324441", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance approving the Garden Del Mar Specific Plan, as approved by the Del Mar City Council On August 4, 2008, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7174, "fingerprint": "2008|200800157|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800157|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d12e49028e062b93", "measure_id": "200800157", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved to amend Section 3.12.030 of the Encinitas Municipal Code to require guests of short term rental units (30 days or less) to pay 2% of the rent charged as a special transient occupancy tax for beach sand replenishment and stabilization projects effective January 1, 2009?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7117, "no_votes": 3835, "total_votes": 10952, "percent_yes": 64.983565, "percent_no": 35.016435, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.280307", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.323011", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved to amend Section 3.12.030 of the Encinitas Municipal Code to require guests of short term rental units (30 days or less) to pay 2% of the rent charged as a special transient occupancy tax for beach sand replenishment and stabilization projects effective January 1, 2009?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11609, "fingerprint": "2008|200800404|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800404|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "cb17511a0bcb2c2e", "measure_id": "200800404", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance which proposes that the transient occupancy tax (TOT) paid by hotel visitors be increased to a rate up to thirteen percent (13%) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1602, "no_votes": 967, "total_votes": 2569, "percent_yes": 62.35889, "percent_no": 37.64111, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.339000", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.283205", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.324649", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance which proposes that the transient occupancy tax (TOT) paid by hotel visitors be increased to a rate up to thirteen percent (13%) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7175, "fingerprint": "2008|200800200|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800200|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b92ddd1f98c3bac0", "measure_id": "200800200", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve learning, assure local students access to comparable, modern classrooms, facilities and technology, shall Oceanside Unified School District issue $195 million in bonds to replace deteriorated plumbing/sewer/roofing systems; renovate student restrooms; improve school/playground safety/security; upgrade or replace outdated electrical, heating/ventilation systems, and aging portable classrooms; at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries and NO estimated tax rate increase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10952, "no_votes": 4414, "total_votes": 15366, "percent_yes": 71.27424500000001, "percent_no": 28.725754999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.281524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.323724", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve learning, assure local students access to comparable, modern classrooms, facilities and technology, shall Oceanside Unified School District issue $195 million in bonds to replace deteriorated plumbing/sewer/roofing systems; renovate student restrooms; improve school/playground safety/security; upgrade or replace outdated electrical, heating/ventilation systems, and aging portable classrooms; at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries and NO estimated tax rate increase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7177, "fingerprint": "2008|200800405|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800405|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9335216e86ad42d4", "measure_id": "200800405", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent further cuts and preserve funding for general city services, including maintaining firefighters and police officers for adequate emergency response, reducing crime and criminal gang/drug activity, maintaining city streets/parks, and preserving youth/after-school programs; shall the City of El Cajon adopt an ordinance enacting a one-half cent transactions and use (sales) tax, automatically expiring in twenty years, with independent oversight, mandatory audits and all money staying local to preserve El Cajon city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15069, "no_votes": 14040, "total_votes": 29109, "percent_yes": 51.76749, "percent_no": 48.23251, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.283496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.324835", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent further cuts and preserve funding for general city services, including maintaining firefighters and police officers for adequate emergency response, reducing crime and criminal gang/drug activity, maintaining city streets/parks, and preserving youth/after-school programs; shall the City of El Cajon adopt an ordinance enacting a one-half cent transactions and use (sales) tax, automatically expiring in twenty years, with independent oversight, mandatory audits and all money staying local to preserve El Cajon city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7178, "fingerprint": "2008|200800406|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800406|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4995f14ace09661d", "measure_id": "200800406", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved to amend Section 3.12.030 of the Encinitas Municipal Code to require guests of short-term vacation rental units (less than 30 days) to pay 2% as a special transient occupancy tax to be used only for beach sand replenishment and stabilization projects (the same as the guests staying at Encinitas hotels and motels currently do) effective January 1, 2009?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21716, "no_votes": 9324, "total_votes": 31040, "percent_yes": 69.96134, "percent_no": 30.038659999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.283821", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.325013", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved to amend Section 3.12.030 of the Encinitas Municipal Code to require guests of short-term vacation rental units (less than 30 days) to pay 2% as a special transient occupancy tax to be used only for beach sand replenishment and stabilization projects (the same as the guests staying at Encinitas hotels and motels currently do) effective January 1, 2009?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7179, "fingerprint": "2008|200800407|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800407|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f463e053aabdf473", "measure_id": "200800407", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential City services including natural disaster response/preparedness programs; youth anti-gang/anti-drug prevention; retaining quality firefighters/paramedics and police officers; increasing street paving/pothole repair; enhancing trolley station security; maintaining the senior community center, after school tutoring and recreation programs; and other general services shall the City sales tax be increased by three-quarters of a cent, requiring annual audits, public expenditure reports, with 20 year expiration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13704, "no_votes": 10984, "total_votes": 24688, "percent_yes": 55.50874999999999, "percent_no": 44.49125000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.284108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.325192", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential City services including natural disaster response/preparedness programs; youth anti-gang/anti-drug prevention; retaining quality firefighters/paramedics and police officers; increasing street paving/pothole repair; enhancing trolley station security; maintaining the senior community center, after school tutoring and recreation programs; and other general services shall the City sales tax be increased by three-quarters of a cent, requiring annual audits, public expenditure reports, with 20 year expiration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7180, "fingerprint": "2008|200800408|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800408|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3666fd3c22bc741e", "measure_id": "200800408", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved repealing Sections 4.60.010 through 4.60.180 of the National City Municipal Code, in order to repeal an existing one percent transactions and use tax (sales tax) which is used for City services, facilities and programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4851, "no_votes": 6513, "total_votes": 11364, "percent_yes": 42.687434, "percent_no": 57.312566, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.284501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.325374", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved repealing Sections 4.60.010 through 4.60.180 of the National City Municipal Code, in order to repeal an existing one percent transactions and use tax (sales tax) which is used for City services, facilities and programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7181, "fingerprint": "2008|200800411|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800411|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a68c6634d40bba40", "measure_id": "200800411", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ordinance No. 2006-1258, adopted by the City Council establishing the Ridgeline Protection & Management Overlay Zone, be approved by the voters of the City of San Marcos and be further amended to require ratification by the voters of the City for any future modifications?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16782, "no_votes": 7610, "total_votes": 24392, "percent_yes": 68.80125, "percent_no": 31.198750000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.285547", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.325914", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ordinance No. 2006-1258, adopted by the City Council establishing the Ridgeline Protection & Management Overlay Zone, be approved by the voters of the City of San Marcos and be further amended to require ratification by the voters of the City for any future modifications?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7182, "fingerprint": "2008|200800412|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800412|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4376c3121bd3bf62", "measure_id": "200800412", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the San Marcos General Plan to require voter approval of certain general plan amendments modifying or changing land use categories or designations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9890, "no_votes": 16589, "total_votes": 26479, "percent_yes": 37.350354, "percent_no": 62.649646, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.285837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.326096", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the San Marcos General Plan to require voter approval of certain general plan amendments modifying or changing land use categories or designations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7183, "fingerprint": "2008|200800413|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800413|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d8eae7f1edd0c61c", "measure_id": "200800413", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed City Charter of the City of Santee be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14465, "no_votes": 6371, "total_votes": 20836, "percent_yes": 69.423115, "percent_no": 30.576885000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.286195", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.326273", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed City Charter of the City of Santee be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7176, "fingerprint": "2008|200800401|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800401|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "385a12e6d29b2af9", "measure_id": "200800401", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Chula Vista be amended to make the City Attorney an elected City Officer, sufficiently independent of the Council and other City officials?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43017, "no_votes": 30094, "total_votes": 73111, "percent_yes": 58.83793000000001, "percent_no": 41.16206999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.282258", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.324087", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Chula Vista be amended to make the City Attorney an elected City Officer, sufficiently independent of the Council and other City officials?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7190, "fingerprint": "2008|200800545|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800545|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d2c1d092ec8a4865", "measure_id": "200800545", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve affordable, South Bay community college education/job training, qualify for state matching grants, upgrade nursing, firefighter/police academy training, repair classrooms, science labs/technology, fix plumbing, bathrooms, roofs, wiring, improve fire/earthquake safety, heating/security systems, remove asbestos; acquire, construct, repair, equip classrooms, sites, facilities, improve handicapped accessibility/energy efficiency to reduce costs; shall Southwestern Community College District issue $389,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, required citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95460, "no_votes": 38221, "total_votes": 133681, "percent_yes": 71.4088, "percent_no": 28.5912, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.288391", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.327569", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve affordable, South Bay community college education/job training, qualify for state matching grants, upgrade nursing, firefighter/police academy training, repair classrooms, science labs/technology, fix plumbing, bathrooms, roofs, wiring, improve fire/earthquake safety, heating/security systems, remove asbestos; acquire, construct, repair, equip classrooms, sites, facilities, improve handicapped accessibility/energy efficiency to reduce costs; shall Southwestern Community College District issue $389,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, required citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7188, "fingerprint": "2008|200800543|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800543|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "791f01f4ea47a3d5", "measure_id": "200800543", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve every neighborhood school by; repairing outdated student restrooms, deteriorated plumbing and roofs; upgrading career/vocational classrooms and labs; providing up-to-date classroom technology; improving school safety/security; replacing dilapidated portable classrooms; upgrading fire alarms; and removing hazardous substances; shall San Diego Unified School District issue $2,100,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, requiring independent citizen oversight, annual audits, NO money for administrators, and bonds issued only if NO estimated tax rate increase", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 261672, "no_votes": 119136, "total_votes": 380808, "percent_yes": 68.71494, "percent_no": 31.28506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.287818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.327203", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve every neighborhood school by; repairing outdated student restrooms, deteriorated plumbing and roofs; upgrading career/vocational classrooms and labs; providing up-to-date classroom technology; improving school safety/security; replacing dilapidated portable classrooms; upgrading fire alarms; and removing hazardous substances; shall San Diego Unified School District issue $2,100,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, requiring independent citizen oversight, annual audits, NO money for administrators, and bonds issued only if NO estimated tax rate increase", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7184, "fingerprint": "2008|200800539|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800539|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d721c3368acb1c1f", "measure_id": "200800539", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student learning and college/job readiness, relieve classroom overcrowding and qualify for State matching funds, shall Escondido Union High School District rehabilitate deteriorated classrooms/equipment/facilities, construct new science and computer labs, upgrade technology, improve safety and energy-efficiency, replace aging portables, add classrooms, and construct a new small high school; by issuing $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all money benefiting Escondido community high schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30006, "no_votes": 20830, "total_votes": 50836, "percent_yes": 59.0251, "percent_no": 40.9749, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.286517", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.326451", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student learning and college/job readiness, relieve classroom overcrowding and qualify for State matching funds, shall Escondido Union High School District rehabilitate deteriorated classrooms/equipment/facilities, construct new science and computer labs, upgrade technology, improve safety and energy-efficiency, replace aging portables, add classrooms, and construct a new small high school; by issuing $98,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries, and all money benefiting Escondido community high schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7185, "fingerprint": "2008|200800540|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800540|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "39a3acfcda885b56", "measure_id": "200800540", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare local high school students for college and high demand jobs, by upgrading educational technology, constructing science labs, replacing deteriorated portables, rehabilitating aging classrooms/equipment/sites/joint-use facilities, improving safety/energy-efficiency, and constructing a new school in Alpine/Blossom Valley; shall Grossmont Union High School District issue $417,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with independent oversight, annual audits, no funding for administrator salaries, and all money benefiting East County high schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97337, "no_votes": 74474, "total_votes": 171811, "percent_yes": 56.65353, "percent_no": 43.34647, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.286835", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.326638", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare local high school students for college and high demand jobs, by upgrading educational technology, constructing science labs, replacing deteriorated portables, rehabilitating aging classrooms/equipment/sites/joint-use facilities, improving safety/energy-efficiency, and constructing a new school in Alpine/Blossom Valley; shall Grossmont Union High School District issue $417,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, qualifying for State matching funds, with independent oversight, annual audits, no funding for administrator salaries, and all money benefiting East County high schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7186, "fingerprint": "2008|200800541|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800541|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "22b9f05b354d3674", "measure_id": "200800541", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Lakeside Union Elementary School District improve and equip local elementary and middle schools to help students meet and exceed high academic standards, through projects including: Improving classrooms/labs for teaching science, math, art and English; Upgrading schools for today's computer learning technology; Repairing outdated wiring, plumbing, heating, air conditioning; Improving safety; by issuing $79.55 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight, all funds remaining local, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10695, "no_votes": 5866, "total_votes": 16561, "percent_yes": 64.579433, "percent_no": 35.420567000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.287133", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.326818", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Lakeside Union Elementary School District improve and equip local elementary and middle schools to help students meet and exceed high academic standards, through projects including: Improving classrooms/labs for teaching science, math, art and English; Upgrading schools for today's computer learning technology; Repairing outdated wiring, plumbing, heating, air conditioning; Improving safety; by issuing $79.55 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight, all funds remaining local, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7187, "fingerprint": "2008|200800542|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800542|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "23beacfba22cb247", "measure_id": "200800542", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct science/technology labs; create a math, science and technology magnet middle school; repair and replace plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems and improve handicap access; renovate playgrounds and improve health and fitness facilities; upgrade existing facilities and improve energy efficiency; and construct a joint use library/media center; shall Lemon Grove School District issue $28,000,000 of bonds within legal interest rates with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8635, "no_votes": 3218, "total_votes": 11853, "percent_yes": 72.85076000000001, "percent_no": 27.149239999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.287494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.326999", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct science/technology labs; create a math, science and technology magnet middle school; repair and replace plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems and improve handicap access; renovate playgrounds and improve health and fitness facilities; upgrade existing facilities and improve energy efficiency; and construct a joint use library/media center; shall Lemon Grove School District issue $28,000,000 of bonds within legal interest rates with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7189, "fingerprint": "2008|200800544|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800544|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "60a1a6ce5e6bce9d", "measure_id": "200800544", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; upgrade electrical systems, improve access to computers and technology; repair and replace roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; and qualify the District for $17,000,000 in State matching grants, shall South Bay Union School District issue $59,400,000 of bonds at lowest possible interest rates, with no money for teacher/administrator salaries, and spending reviewed by an independent oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15219, "no_votes": 4690, "total_votes": 19909, "percent_yes": 76.442814, "percent_no": 23.557186, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.288105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.327386", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; upgrade electrical systems, improve access to computers and technology; repair and replace roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; and qualify the District for $17,000,000 in State matching grants, shall South Bay Union School District issue $59,400,000 of bonds at lowest possible interest rates, with no money for teacher/administrator salaries, and spending reviewed by an independent oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11615, "fingerprint": "2008|200800243|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800243|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "11fa476d102e9dfd", "measure_id": "200800243", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City adopt state law signature requirements for petitions to recall City officials?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 300595, "no_votes": 58049, "total_votes": 358644, "percent_yes": 83.81431, "percent_no": 16.185689999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.344880", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.292382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.329738", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City adopt state law signature requirements for petitions to recall City officials?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11614, "fingerprint": "2008|200800201|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800201|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "4f87b57763cc9a05", "measure_id": "200800201", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance quality educational programs for children; attract and retain quality teachers and staff by increasing salaries; provide teachers with additional compensation for extra work at hard-to-staff schools and in hard-to-fill subject areas; and increase teacher training, resources and classroom support, technology, innovation, and accountability, shall the San Francisco Unified School District be authorized to levy $198 per parcel annually, adjusted for inflation, with mandatory citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 113999, "no_votes": 51273, "total_votes": 165272, "percent_yes": 68.9766, "percent_no": 31.023399999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.344690", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.292035", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.329555", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance quality educational programs for children; attract and retain quality teachers and staff by increasing salaries; provide teachers with additional compensation for extra work at hard-to-staff schools and in hard-to-fill subject areas; and increase teacher training, resources and classroom support, technology, innovation, and accountability, shall the San Francisco Unified School District be authorized to levy $198 per parcel annually, adjusted for inflation, with mandatory citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7191, "fingerprint": "2008|200800008|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800008|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "898d7c221de8982f", "measure_id": "200800008", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City incur $185,000,000 of bonded indebtedness to fund certain costs associated with the construction, reconstruction, purchase and/or improvement of park and recreation facilities located within the City, under the jurisdiction of the Recreation Park Commission or under the jurisdiction of the Port Commission as further described in Section 3 of the ordinance placing this measure onto the ballot, and paying other costs necessary and convenient for effectuating those purposes, including costs connected with or incidental to the authorization, issuance and sale of the bonds; and authorizing landlords to pass-through to residential tenants in units subject to Chapter 37 of the San Francisco Administrative Code (the \"Residential Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance\") 50% of the increase in the real property taxes attributable to the cost of the repayment of the bonds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 177194, "no_votes": 71232, "total_votes": 248426, "percent_yes": 71.326673, "percent_no": 28.673327, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.288747", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.327749", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City incur $185,000,000 of bonded indebtedness to fund certain costs associated with the construction, reconstruction, purchase and/or improvement of park and recreation facilities located within the City, under the jurisdiction of the Recreation Park Commission or under the jurisdiction of the Port Commission as further described in Section 3 of the ordinance placing this measure onto the ballot, and paying other costs necessary and convenient for effectuating those purposes, including costs connected with or incidental to the authorization, issuance and sale of the bonds; and authorizing landlords to pass-through to residential tenants in units subject to Chapter 37 of the San Francisco Administrative Code (the \"Residential Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance\") 50% of the increase in the real property taxes attributable to the cost of the repayment of the bonds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11616, "fingerprint": "2008|200800244|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800244|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "c623c7bb2b679ac4", "measure_id": "200800244", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City change the name of the Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant to the George W Bush Sewage Plant?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 166299, "no_votes": 181534, "total_votes": 347833, "percent_yes": 47.810012, "percent_no": 52.189988, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.345069", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.292703", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.329920", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change the name of the Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant to the George W Bush Sewage Plant?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11612, "fingerprint": "2008|200800121|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800121|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "69fe0edad2c8313e", "measure_id": "200800121", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To ensure the availability of San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center in the event of a natural disaster or emergency, by building and/or rebuilding and improving the earthquake safety of the hospital and to pay related costs necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $887,400,000 in general obligation bonds subject to independent oversight and regular audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 118729, "no_votes": 41598, "total_votes": 160327, "percent_yes": 74.054277, "percent_no": 25.945723, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.343076", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.289769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.328289", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure the availability of San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center in the event of a natural disaster or emergency, by building and/or rebuilding and improving the earthquake safety of the hospital and to pay related costs necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $887,400,000 in general obligation bonds subject to independent oversight and regular audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7192, "fingerprint": "2008|200800009|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800009|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "faaed6079759f822", "measure_id": "200800009", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City allow certain retirement-eligible police officers to continue working for up to three additional years while accumulating their regular retirement benefits in tax deferred retirement accounts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 158883, "no_votes": 86613, "total_votes": 245496, "percent_yes": 64.71918, "percent_no": 35.280820000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.289090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.327929", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City allow certain retirement-eligible police officers to continue working for up to three additional years while accumulating their regular retirement benefits in tax deferred retirement accounts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11617, "fingerprint": "2008|200800245|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800245|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "712cf17fd793722f", "measure_id": "200800245", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City prohibit San Francisco Employees' Retirement System members who are convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude in connection with their employment from receiving any retirement benefits funded with employer contributions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 124395, "no_votes": 202419, "total_votes": 326814, "percent_yes": 38.062936, "percent_no": 61.937064, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.345259", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.293073", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.330101", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City prohibit San Francisco Employees' Retirement System members who are convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude in connection with their employment from receiving any retirement benefits funded with employer contributions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11613, "fingerprint": "2008|200800122|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800122|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "bc3b3b36e1f9200e", "measure_id": "200800122", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase its transfer tax on sales of real estate worth more than $5 million to 1.5% and reduce the tax by up to 1/3 on sales of residences where the seller installed solar energy systems or made seismic safety improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91924, "no_votes": 66379, "total_votes": 158303, "percent_yes": 58.06839, "percent_no": 41.93161, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.343494", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.290103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.328469", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase its transfer tax on sales of real estate worth more than $5 million to 1.5% and reduce the tax by up to 1/3 on sales of residences where the seller installed solar energy systems or made seismic safety improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7193, "fingerprint": "2008|200800010|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800010|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b6bb0a5045263ff0", "measure_id": "200800010", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy that the City should explore and facilitate the acquisition of Alcatraz Island from the United States government to transform it into a Global Peace Center?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 69251, "no_votes": 177301, "total_votes": 246552, "percent_yes": 28.087786, "percent_no": 71.912214, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.289448", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.328111", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy that the City should explore and facilitate the acquisition of Alcatraz Island from the United States government to transform it into a Global Peace Center?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11618, "fingerprint": "2008|200800246|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800246|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ff9983456d61bdd8", "measure_id": "200800246", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy that its elected representatives in the United States Senate and House of Representatives vote against any further funding for the deployment of United States Armed Forces in Iraq, except for funds to withdraw troops?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 226513, "no_votes": 106228, "total_votes": 332741, "percent_yes": 68.07487, "percent_no": 31.925129999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.345446", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.293364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.330279", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy that its elected representatives in the United States Senate and House of Representatives vote against any further funding for the deployment of United States Armed Forces in Iraq, except for funds to withdraw troops?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7194, "fingerprint": "2008|200800123|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800123|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "70d6849385f0fe46", "measure_id": "200800123", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City replace the Emergency Response Fee with an Access Line Tax at the same rates and with the same exemptions, and revise the Telephone Users Tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91642, "no_votes": 63681, "total_votes": 155323, "percent_yes": 59.00092, "percent_no": 40.99908, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.290433", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.328651", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City replace the Emergency Response Fee with an Access Line Tax at the same rates and with the same exemptions, and revise the Telephone Users Tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11619, "fingerprint": "2008|200800247|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800247|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "526765acfbea4b7a", "measure_id": "200800247", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City shift all City elections except special elections to even-numbered years after the November 2011 election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 195605, "no_votes": 129862, "total_votes": 325467, "percent_yes": 60.09979, "percent_no": 39.90021, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.345633", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.293761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.330456", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City shift all City elections except special elections to even-numbered years after the November 2011 election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7195, "fingerprint": "2008|200800124|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800124|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "98285f0aaec4a862", "measure_id": "200800124", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City allow City employees to purchase retirement system credit for unpaid parental leave taken before July 1, 2003, as long as the purchase price covers all City costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80489, "no_votes": 74916, "total_votes": 155405, "percent_yes": 51.793057, "percent_no": 48.206943, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.290750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.328828", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City allow City employees to purchase retirement system credit for unpaid parental leave taken before July 1, 2003, as long as the purchase price covers all City costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11620, "fingerprint": "2008|200800248|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800248|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a4b90c9191e95304", "measure_id": "200800248", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City change the size and composition of the Transportation Authority Board and encourage the Authority to use City agencies and departments to perform staff functions, to obtain expert financial review before adopting Authority budgets, and to adopt the same ethics and public records laws that apply to City agencies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 144592, "no_votes": 176692, "total_votes": 321284, "percent_yes": 45.004418, "percent_no": 54.995582, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.345828", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.294051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.330664", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change the size and composition of the Transportation Authority Board and encourage the Authority to use City agencies and departments to perform staff functions, to obtain expert financial review before adopting Authority budgets, and to adopt the same ethics and public records laws that apply to City agencies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7196, "fingerprint": "2008|200800125|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800125|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "70d4d36924cef87a", "measure_id": "200800125", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City be required to provide enough free and low-cost substance abuse treatment services to meet demand and to maintain funding for such services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58756, "no_votes": 101112, "total_votes": 159868, "percent_yes": 36.75282, "percent_no": 63.24718, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.291061", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.329010", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City be required to provide enough free and low-cost substance abuse treatment services to meet demand and to maintain funding for such services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11621, "fingerprint": "2008|200800249|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800249|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "639f048367598bee", "measure_id": "200800249", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy that the voters will not approve any new set-aside of City revenue unless the set-aside identifies a new funding source, includes limits on annual increases, and automatically expires after 10 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 202011, "no_votes": 121354, "total_votes": 323365, "percent_yes": 62.47151, "percent_no": 37.52849, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.346014", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.294369", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.330852", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy that the voters will not approve any new set-aside of City revenue unless the set-aside identifies a new funding source, includes limits on annual increases, and automatically expires after 10 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7197, "fingerprint": "2008|200800126|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800126|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6242c0b93272a846", "measure_id": "200800126", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City provide funds to develop Pier 70, based on new City hotel and payroll expense tax revenues from the development, if the Board of Supervisors approves a financial and land use plan for Pier 70?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 99008, "no_votes": 59423, "total_votes": 158431, "percent_yes": 62.49282, "percent_no": 37.50718, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.291348", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.329188", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City provide funds to develop Pier 70, based on new City hotel and payroll expense tax revenues from the development, if the Board of Supervisors approves a financial and land use plan for Pier 70?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11622, "fingerprint": "2008|200800250|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800250|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ee9345cb5d69b769", "measure_id": "200800250", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be unlawful for City elected officials, candidates or political committees they control to solicit or accept campaign contributions from contractors who are prohibited from making contributions to these elected officials, candidates and political committees because the contractor has a pending contract or a recently approved contract before the official or the Board on which the official or an appointee of the official sits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 133214, "no_votes": 211681, "total_votes": 344895, "percent_yes": 38.62451, "percent_no": 61.37549, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.346204", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.294684", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.331033", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be unlawful for City elected officials, candidates or political committees they control to solicit or accept campaign contributions from contractors who are prohibited from making contributions to these elected officials, candidates and political committees because the contractor has a pending contract or a recently approved contract before the official or the Board on which the official or an appointee of the official sits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7198, "fingerprint": "2008|200800127|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800127|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "094b9cb48a59e9f2", "measure_id": "200800127", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City specify that certain partnerships and other businesses are subject to the City's payroll expense tax and expand the payroll expense tax exemption for small businesses so that businesses with annual payroll expenses of $250,000 or less would not have to pay the tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 104012, "no_votes": 50865, "total_votes": 154877, "percent_yes": 67.15781, "percent_no": 32.84219, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.291694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.329367", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City specify that certain partnerships and other businesses are subject to the City's payroll expense tax and expand the payroll expense tax exemption for small businesses so that businesses with annual payroll expenses of $250,000 or less would not have to pay the tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7199, "fingerprint": "2008|200800251|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800251|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "bbedc351de114225", "measure_id": "200800251", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy that the membership of City boards and commissions reflect the interests and contributions of both men and women of all races, ethnicities, sexual orientations and types of disabilities and that City officers and agencies support the nomination, appointment or confirmation of female, minority and disabled candidates to fill seats on those bodies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117050, "no_votes": 201811, "total_votes": 318861, "percent_yes": 36.708784, "percent_no": 63.291216, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.295004", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.331216", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy that the membership of City boards and commissions reflect the interests and contributions of both men and women of all races, ethnicities, sexual orientations and types of disabilities and that City officers and agencies support the nomination, appointment or confirmation of female, minority and disabled candidates to fill seats on those bodies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7200, "fingerprint": "2008|200800252|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800252|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "67c1c2d28d6725e3", "measure_id": "200800252", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City guarantee that the City provide first-year funding for the Community Justice Center, authorize the Director of Property to lease space for the CJC, and define the CJC's scope and operations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 183372, "no_votes": 146194, "total_votes": 329566, "percent_yes": 55.64045, "percent_no": 44.35955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.295296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.331395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City guarantee that the City provide first-year funding for the Community Justice Center, authorize the Director of Property to lease space for the CJC, and define the CJC's scope and operations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7201, "fingerprint": "2008|200800253|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800253|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d5f3055652d1f95a", "measure_id": "200800253", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase the years of service required for new City employees and certain employees of the School District, the Superior Court and the Community College District to qualify for employer-funded retiree health benefits, establish a separate Retiree Health Care Trust Fund to fund retiree health care costs, and increase retirement benefits and retirement cost-of-living adjustments for certain City employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140185, "no_votes": 202235, "total_votes": 342420, "percent_yes": 40.93949, "percent_no": 59.06051, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.295587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.331593", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the years of service required for new City employees and certain employees of the School District, the Superior Court and the Community College District to qualify for employer-funded retiree health benefits, establish a separate Retiree Health Care Trust Fund to fund retiree health care costs, and increase retirement benefits and retirement cost-of-living adjustments for certain City employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7202, "fingerprint": "2008|200800254|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800254|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "e141d619447d8e37", "measure_id": "200800254", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to encourage timely development of a mixed-use project in the Bayview on Candlestick Point and Hunters Point Shipyard, including a new 49ers stadium or a non-stadium alternative; shall the City be authorized to transfer park land in Candlestick Point for non-recreational use if the land is replaced with new public parks or open spaces of at least equal size and the transfer meets the measure\u2019s policy objectives; and shall Propositions D and F, approved by the voters in June 1997, be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 132097, "no_votes": 178440, "total_votes": 310537, "percent_yes": 42.53825, "percent_no": 57.46175, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.295883", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.332252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to encourage timely development of a mixed-use project in the Bayview on Candlestick Point and Hunters Point Shipyard, including a new 49ers stadium or a non-stadium alternative; shall the City be authorized to transfer park land in Candlestick Point for non-recreational use if the land is replaced with new public parks or open spaces of at least equal size and the transfer meets the measure\u2019s policy objectives; and shall Propositions D and F, approved by the voters in June 1997, be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7203, "fingerprint": "2008|200800255|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800255|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b516eb6f6d86aec7", "measure_id": "200800255", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City: stop enforcing laws against prostitution; stop funding or supporting the First Offender Prostitution Program or any similar anti-prostitution program; enforce existing criminal laws that prohibit crimes such as battery, extortion and rape, regardless of the victim's status as a sex worker; and fully disclose the investigation and prosecution of violent crimes against sex workers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 195023, "no_votes": 136416, "total_votes": 331439, "percent_yes": 58.841294, "percent_no": 41.158706, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.296230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.332701", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City: stop enforcing laws against prostitution; stop funding or supporting the First Offender Prostitution Program or any similar anti-prostitution program; enforce existing criminal laws that prohibit crimes such as battery, extortion and rape, regardless of the victim's status as a sex worker; and fully disclose the investigation and prosecution of violent crimes against sex workers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7204, "fingerprint": "2008|200800256|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800256|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "709202bcec13b77d", "measure_id": "200800256", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City establish a seven-member Historic Preservation Commission and give it authority over historic preservation-related decisions in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 223808, "no_votes": 102621, "total_votes": 326429, "percent_yes": 68.56254, "percent_no": 31.43746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.296559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.332989", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City establish a seven-member Historic Preservation Commission and give it authority over historic preservation-related decisions in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7205, "fingerprint": "2008|200800257|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800257|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b4956e594d114569", "measure_id": "200800257", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to encourage the School Board to reverse its decision to terminate JROTC and to continue to offer JROTC in San Francisco public high schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 208044, "no_votes": 103679, "total_votes": 311723, "percent_yes": 66.74002399999999, "percent_no": 33.25997600000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.296874", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.333266", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to encourage the School Board to reverse its decision to terminate JROTC and to continue to offer JROTC in San Francisco public high schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7206, "fingerprint": "2008|200800258|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800258|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a26bda48ee97e046", "measure_id": "200800258", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy that any mixed-use development plan the City approves for Candlestick Point and Hunters Point Shipyard require 50% of all new housing units developed in the area be affordable, give preferences for the rental or purchase of new affordable housing to families of low and moderate income, and, if Alice Griffith housing is rebuilt, replace the units on a one-to-one basis; and shall the City be prohibited from selling, conveying or leasing any City-owned land at Candlestick Point unless the Board of Supervisors finds that the mixed-use development plan for this area incorporates these policies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 101230, "no_votes": 205665, "total_votes": 306895, "percent_yes": 32.985222, "percent_no": 67.014778, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.297160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.333551", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy that any mixed-use development plan the City approves for Candlestick Point and Hunters Point Shipyard require 50% of all new housing units developed in the area be affordable, give preferences for the rental or purchase of new affordable housing to families of low and moderate income, and, if Alice Griffith housing is rebuilt, replace the units on a one-to-one basis; and shall the City be prohibited from selling, conveying or leasing any City-owned land at Candlestick Point unless the Board of Supervisors finds that the mixed-use development plan for this area incorporates these policies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7207, "fingerprint": "2008|200800259|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800259|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2b655572fa7d9849", "measure_id": "200800259", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City's Residential Rent Ordinance be amended to prohibit specific acts of tenant harassment by landlords and to provide for enforcement by means of court orders, rent reduction, monetary awards or criminal penalties?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233411, "no_votes": 81178, "total_votes": 314589, "percent_yes": 74.19554000000001, "percent_no": 25.80445999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.297443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.333830", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's Residential Rent Ordinance be amended to prohibit specific acts of tenant harassment by landlords and to provide for enforcement by means of court orders, rent reduction, monetary awards or criminal penalties?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7208, "fingerprint": "2008|200800260|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800260|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "16a57bc87f080481", "measure_id": "200800260", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City set qualifications for members of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and change the process for appointing members to the PUC by requiring a majority of the Board of Supervisors to approve the Mayor's appointments to the PUC?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 101376, "no_votes": 233733, "total_votes": 335109, "percent_yes": 30.25165, "percent_no": 69.74835, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.297767", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.334112", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City set qualifications for members of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and change the process for appointing members to the PUC by requiring a majority of the Board of Supervisors to approve the Mayor's appointments to the PUC?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7209, "fingerprint": "2008|200800261|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800261|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "484f0b9d5a480ba4", "measure_id": "200800261", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create an Office of the Independent Ratepayer Advocate to make recommendations about utility rates to the City's Public Utilities Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 167974, "no_votes": 133817, "total_votes": 301791, "percent_yes": 55.65905, "percent_no": 44.34095, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.298082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.334389", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create an Office of the Independent Ratepayer Advocate to make recommendations about utility rates to the City's Public Utilities Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7210, "fingerprint": "2008|200800262|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800262|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0fcd11563a79db09", "measure_id": "200800262", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City establish an Affordable Housing Fund; set aside from the property tax 2 \u00bd cents for every $100 of assessed value for this Fund through 2024; and use this Fund, subject to public review, to acquire and develop new affordable housing units meeting certain priorities and income limitations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 200649, "no_votes": 127014, "total_votes": 327663, "percent_yes": 61.236393, "percent_no": 38.763607, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.298401", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.334665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City establish an Affordable Housing Fund; set aside from the property tax 2 \u00bd cents for every $100 of assessed value for this Fund through 2024; and use this Fund, subject to public review, to acquire and develop new affordable housing units meeting certain priorities and income limitations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7211, "fingerprint": "2008|200800263|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800263|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "67be29d7939e4276", "measure_id": "200800263", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City: evaluate making the City the primary provider of electric power in San Francisco; consider options to provide energy to San Francisco residents, businesses and City departments; mandate deadlines for the City to meet its energy needs through clean and renewable energy sources; establish a new Office of the Independent Ratepayer Advocate to make recommendations about utility rates to the City's Public Utilities Commission; and allow the Board of Supervisors to approve the issuance of revenue bonds to pay for any public utility facilities without voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 193407, "no_votes": 133002, "total_votes": 326409, "percent_yes": 59.25296, "percent_no": 40.74704, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.298754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.334947", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City: evaluate making the City the primary provider of electric power in San Francisco; consider options to provide energy to San Francisco residents, businesses and City departments; mandate deadlines for the City to meet its energy needs through clean and renewable energy sources; establish a new Office of the Independent Ratepayer Advocate to make recommendations about utility rates to the City's Public Utilities Commission; and allow the Board of Supervisors to approve the issuance of revenue bonds to pay for any public utility facilities without voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7212, "fingerprint": "2008|200800264|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800264|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a6f0941be47066fc", "measure_id": "200800264", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City prohibit City employees from serving on most Charter created boards and commissions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 179639, "no_votes": 149169, "total_votes": 328808, "percent_yes": 54.6334, "percent_no": 45.3666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.299070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.335228", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City prohibit City employees from serving on most Charter created boards and commissions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7213, "fingerprint": "2008|200800083|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800083|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "2a98e3465be7ca1e", "measure_id": "200800083", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and student access to computers and technology, renovate science labs, repair restrooms, modernize and upgrade schools and classrooms throughout the District, construct additional classrooms and facilities, replace outdated temporary portable classrooms with permanent classrooms, and qualify the District for millions in State matching funds, shall the Stockton Unified School District issue $464,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20331, "no_votes": 9164, "total_votes": 29495, "percent_yes": 68.93033, "percent_no": 31.069670000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.299403", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.335504", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and student access to computers and technology, renovate science labs, repair restrooms, modernize and upgrade schools and classrooms throughout the District, construct additional classrooms and facilities, replace outdated temporary portable classrooms with permanent classrooms, and qualify the District for millions in State matching funds, shall the Stockton Unified School District issue $464,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with an independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7214, "fingerprint": "2008|200800202|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800202|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "49ae11ca01e2e450", "measure_id": "200800202", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, improve school safety and provide facilities that best serve the students and community, shall the Oak View School District construct and equip a multipurpose room building to be utilized for food service, student performances, band, assemblies, physical education, and a staff lunchroom/workroom, and, funding allowing, remodeling the current multipurpose room for a library, computer lab, and office space by issuing $3.7 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 380, "no_votes": 188, "total_votes": 568, "percent_yes": 66.90141, "percent_no": 33.09859, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.299694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.335720", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, improve school safety and provide facilities that best serve the students and community, shall the Oak View School District construct and equip a multipurpose room building to be utilized for food service, student performances, band, assemblies, physical education, and a staff lunchroom/workroom, and, funding allowing, remodeling the current multipurpose room for a library, computer lab, and office space by issuing $3.7 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7217, "fingerprint": "2008|200800546|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800546|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "3c044bfb89526c04", "measure_id": "200800546", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize the community's oldest elementary and middle schools, upgrade classrooms, replace aging roofs, old heating, electrical, plumbing, cooling and ventilation systems with energy efficient systems, and improve security and technology systems at all schools, increasing student access to computers,shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of the Tracy Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $43,100,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with all expenditures monitored by an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14856, "no_votes": 6180, "total_votes": 21036, "percent_yes": 70.62178999999999, "percent_no": 29.37821000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.300779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.336262", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize the community's oldest elementary and middle schools, upgrade classrooms, replace aging roofs, old heating, electrical, plumbing, cooling and ventilation systems with energy efficient systems, and improve security and technology systems at all schools, increasing student access to computers,shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of the Tracy Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $43,100,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with all expenditures monitored by an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7216, "fingerprint": "2008|200800415|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800415|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "04f20b5b815cdefc", "measure_id": "200800415", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Tracy Municipal Code be amended to add section 2.04.040 setting a two (2) term maximum limit for holding office as a City Council Member, and a two (2) term maximum limit for holding office as Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15480, "no_votes": 7479, "total_votes": 22959, "percent_yes": 67.42454, "percent_no": 32.57546000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.300313", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.336084", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Tracy Municipal Code be amended to add section 2.04.040 setting a two (2) term maximum limit for holding office as a City Council Member, and a two (2) term maximum limit for holding office as Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7215, "fingerprint": "2008|200800414|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800414|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "7d16912744a9554d", "measure_id": "200800414", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to modernize the current ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used for telecommunication and video services; to maintain funding for general municipal services, such as police and fire protection, street maintenance, parks and libraries, subject to an annual independent audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44193, "no_votes": 27617, "total_votes": 71810, "percent_yes": 61.54157, "percent_no": 38.45843, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.299983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.335905", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to modernize the current ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used for telecommunication and video services; to maintain funding for general municipal services, such as police and fire protection, street maintenance, parks and libraries, subject to an annual independent audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7218, "fingerprint": "2008|200800161|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800161|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "f4e3d49d2faf6cee", "measure_id": "200800161", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve, enhance and improve the infrastructure, safety and character of Pismo Beach, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the City of Pismo Beach sales tax by one-half cent for a period of six and one half years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1482, "no_votes": 1175, "total_votes": 2657, "percent_yes": 55.77719, "percent_no": 44.22281, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.301122", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.336441", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve, enhance and improve the infrastructure, safety and character of Pismo Beach, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the City of Pismo Beach sales tax by one-half cent for a period of six and one half years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7219, "fingerprint": "2008|200800416|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800416|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "bcf8d72ef425cc6d", "measure_id": "200800416", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting commercial establishments in excess of 150,000 square feet of gross floor area and retail discount stores in excess of 90,000 square feet with at least 5% of gross floor area dedicated to non-taxable goods such groceries be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4392, "no_votes": 9281, "total_votes": 13673, "percent_yes": 32.1217, "percent_no": 67.8783, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.301474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.336624", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting commercial establishments in excess of 150,000 square feet of gross floor area and retail discount stores in excess of 90,000 square feet with at least 5% of gross floor area dedicated to non-taxable goods such groceries be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7220, "fingerprint": "2008|200800417|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800417|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "e4500a2a1a2d687d", "measure_id": "200800417", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall sections 201 (and related references throughout the Charter), 407, 410, 505, 601, 701, 709, 901, 906, 1001, 1006, 1202, and 1205 of the Charter of the City of San Luis Obispo be amended to make technical, non-substantive revisions, as set forth in City Council Resolution No. 10007 (2008 Series)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8728, "no_votes": 7273, "total_votes": 16001, "percent_yes": 54.54659, "percent_no": 45.45341, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.301765", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.336808", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall sections 201 (and related references throughout the Charter), 407, 410, 505, 601, 701, 709, 901, 906, 1001, 1006, 1202, and 1205 of the Charter of the City of San Luis Obispo be amended to make technical, non-substantive revisions, as set forth in City Council Resolution No. 10007 (2008 Series)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7221, "fingerprint": "2008|200800011|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800011|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fdf513e119cb3ab9", "measure_id": "200800011", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 069094 of the County of San Mateo continuing the levy of a special tax for four years at a maximum rate of $65 per parcel per year for fire protection and extended police services be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1314, "no_votes": 407, "total_votes": 1721, "percent_yes": 76.35096, "percent_no": 23.64904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.302051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.336986", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 069094 of the County of San Mateo continuing the levy of a special tax for four years at a maximum rate of $65 per parcel per year for fire protection and extended police services be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7223, "fingerprint": "2008|200800085|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800085|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8f4b09dbcc4c33ac", "measure_id": "200800085", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade schools, classrooms, libraries, computer labs; repair roofs, walls, floors, restrooms, wiring, heating/cooling at older schools; improve student safety/security; add classrooms at existing schools to reduce overcrowding; and improve overall quality of local elementary/middle schools, shall San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District issue $175 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and annual audits to guarantee all funds improve local elementary/middle schools.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48116, "no_votes": 24931, "total_votes": 73047, "percent_yes": 65.86992000000001, "percent_no": 34.13007999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.302901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.337353", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade schools, classrooms, libraries, computer labs; repair roofs, walls, floors, restrooms, wiring, heating/cooling at older schools; improve student safety/security; add classrooms at existing schools to reduce overcrowding; and improve overall quality of local elementary/middle schools, shall San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District issue $175 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and annual audits to guarantee all funds improve local elementary/middle schools.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7224, "fingerprint": "2008|200800086|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800086|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a4f8941bef134312", "measure_id": "200800086", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To create a 10 year technology fund for upgrading classroom computers; to improve energy efficiency; to build classrooms for career, technical, and vocational education courses; and to improve, expand, modernize and construct classrooms and facilities at Carlmont, Menlo-Atherton, Sequoia, and Woodside High Schools and other district sites; shall the Sequoia Union High School District issue $165,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with all expenditures monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28285, "no_votes": 9106, "total_votes": 37391, "percent_yes": 75.646544, "percent_no": 24.353455999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.303323", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.337535", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To create a 10 year technology fund for upgrading classroom computers; to improve energy efficiency; to build classrooms for career, technical, and vocational education courses; and to improve, expand, modernize and construct classrooms and facilities at Carlmont, Menlo-Atherton, Sequoia, and Woodside High Schools and other district sites; shall the Sequoia Union High School District issue $165,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with all expenditures monitored by an Independent Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7222, "fingerprint": "2008|200800084|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800084|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d42eb5a0459dc081", "measure_id": "200800084", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve students\u2019 reading, writing, math, and science skills by recruiting and retaining experienced, highly qualified teachers and support staff; and by supporting supplemental educational programs and services, shall the Ravenswood City School District levy an annual parcel tax of $98 for five (5) years, beginning July 1, 2009; and increase the District\u2019s total appropriations limit annually according to statute, with exemptions available to individuals aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3267, "no_votes": 910, "total_votes": 4177, "percent_yes": 78.21403000000001, "percent_no": 21.785969999999992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.302382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.337164", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve students\u2019 reading, writing, math, and science skills by recruiting and retaining experienced, highly qualified teachers and support staff; and by supporting supplemental educational programs and services, shall the Ravenswood City School District levy an annual parcel tax of $98 for five (5) years, beginning July 1, 2009; and increase the District\u2019s total appropriations limit annually according to statute, with exemptions available to individuals aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7228, "fingerprint": "2008|200800204|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800204|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e757d4cf651454a7", "measure_id": "200800204", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect local elementary and middle schools from state budget cuts, maintain high quality education, preserve small class sizes, attract and retain qualified teachers, protect vital academic programs and maintain classroom and school facilities, shall the Pacifica School District levy a temporary parcel tax of $96/year for 5 years with independent citizen oversight, an exemption for senior citizens, no funds used for administrator salaries and all funds staying in this community to promote student achievement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5688, "no_votes": 2844, "total_votes": 8532, "percent_yes": 66.66667, "percent_no": 33.333330000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.304479", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.338375", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect local elementary and middle schools from state budget cuts, maintain high quality education, preserve small class sizes, attract and retain qualified teachers, protect vital academic programs and maintain classroom and school facilities, shall the Pacifica School District levy a temporary parcel tax of $96/year for 5 years with independent citizen oversight, an exemption for senior citizens, no funds used for administrator salaries and all funds staying in this community to promote student achievement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7225, "fingerprint": "2008|200800128|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800128|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8fce2a97039e00c0", "measure_id": "200800128", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To better support parks and recreation services provided by cities, special districts, and San Mateo County, including: Supporting after-school and summer programs for children and teens; providing overdue maintenance and repairs to parks, trails, and recreation areas; preserving natural open spaces; maintaining and improving park bathrooms and facilities; repairing and upgrading playgrounds and playing fields; Shall San Mateo County enact a one-eighth (1/8) cent sales tax, with annual audits and reports to the community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61009, "no_votes": 39804, "total_votes": 100813, "percent_yes": 60.516995, "percent_no": 39.483005, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.303619", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.337727", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better support parks and recreation services provided by cities, special districts, and San Mateo County, including: Supporting after-school and summer programs for children and teens; providing overdue maintenance and repairs to parks, trails, and recreation areas; preserving natural open spaces; maintaining and improving park bathrooms and facilities; repairing and upgrading playgrounds and playing fields; Shall San Mateo County enact a one-eighth (1/8) cent sales tax, with annual audits and reports to the community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7227, "fingerprint": "2008|200800203|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800203|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "19f0c13645c281cb", "measure_id": "200800203", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure that the children of Millbrae continue to receive a high quality education, to offset State budget cuts, to reinstate eliminated music, library, instructional and technology aides and custodians, protect teachers from layoffs, and to support and maintain the District's academic programs and classroom health and safety, shall the Millbrae Elementary School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of seventy-eight ($78) dollars per taxable parcel, limited to five years with a tax exemption for senior citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3190, "no_votes": 1622, "total_votes": 4812, "percent_yes": 66.29260000000001, "percent_no": 33.70739999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.304171", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.338090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure that the children of Millbrae continue to receive a high quality education, to offset State budget cuts, to reinstate eliminated music, library, instructional and technology aides and custodians, protect teachers from layoffs, and to support and maintain the District's academic programs and classroom health and safety, shall the Millbrae Elementary School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of seventy-eight ($78) dollars per taxable parcel, limited to five years with a tax exemption for senior citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11623, "fingerprint": "2008|200800265|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800265|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "71fdb2c11963bfc9", "measure_id": "200800265", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Chapter 5.148 be added to the San Mateo County Ordinance Code, which would impose a business license tax of eight percent of gross receipts on operators of commercial parking facilities located in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120709, "no_votes": 134078, "total_votes": 254787, "percent_yes": 47.376436, "percent_no": 52.623564, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.352145", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.304837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.338566", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 5.148 be added to the San Mateo County Ordinance Code, which would impose a business license tax of eight percent of gross receipts on operators of commercial parking facilities located in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7226, "fingerprint": "2008|200800162|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800162|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ceb422d9f323318c", "measure_id": "200800162", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide and maintain City of Half Moon Bay's library services; youth and senior facilities, programs and services; police services; park and recreational facilities and programs; city streets and other city purposes; shall an ordiance be adopted increasing the transient occupancy tax, which is general tax on the cost of hotel rooms, paid by the person renting the room, from 10 percent to 12 percent of the room rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1523, "no_votes": 741, "total_votes": 2264, "percent_yes": 67.27032, "percent_no": 32.72968, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.303896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.337907", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide and maintain City of Half Moon Bay's library services; youth and senior facilities, programs and services; police services; park and recreational facilities and programs; city streets and other city purposes; shall an ordiance be adopted increasing the transient occupancy tax, which is general tax on the cost of hotel rooms, paid by the person renting the room, from 10 percent to 12 percent of the room rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7229, "fingerprint": "2008|200800266|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800266|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7c98bd95024a02c7", "measure_id": "200800266", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Chapter 5.150 be added to the San Mateo County Ordinance Code, 1L which would impose a business license tax of two and one-half percent (2.5%) of gross receipts on operators of vehicle rental businesses located in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 119618, "no_votes": 134403, "total_votes": 254021, "percent_yes": 47.089806, "percent_no": 52.910194, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.305218", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.338751", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 5.150 be added to the San Mateo County Ordinance Code, 1L which would impose a business license tax of two and one-half percent (2.5%) of gross receipts on operators of vehicle rental businesses located in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7236, "fingerprint": "2008|200800550|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800550|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e6323d05c05f5209", "measure_id": "200800550", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain early reading programs, small class sizes and school libraries, support science, writing, mathematics, arts, and technology, retain and attract quality teachers and staff, and maintain safe schools, shall the San Carlos School District replace its existing special tax, increasing the rate by $75 for a total of $185 per parcel per year beginning July 1, 2009, with cost-of-living adjustments not more than 3% annually, an Independent Oversight Committee and offering a senior exemption?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9423, "no_votes": 4941, "total_votes": 14364, "percent_yes": 65.601504, "percent_no": 34.398495999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.307439", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.340045", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain early reading programs, small class sizes and school libraries, support science, writing, mathematics, arts, and technology, retain and attract quality teachers and staff, and maintain safe schools, shall the San Carlos School District replace its existing special tax, increasing the rate by $75 for a total of $185 per parcel per year beginning July 1, 2009, with cost-of-living adjustments not more than 3% annually, an Independent Oversight Committee and offering a senior exemption?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7230, "fingerprint": "2008|200800418|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800418|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5d6c7afe88074e87", "measure_id": "200800418", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special business license tax for capital improvements be imposed on any business in the City having gross receipts in excess of $10,000,000, at the rate of seven and one-half cents (7% per $100 of gross receipts, subject to certain maximum limits and reduced by any sales taxes that may be paid by that business to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1316, "no_votes": 556, "total_votes": 1872, "percent_yes": 70.29914000000001, "percent_no": 29.70085999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.305490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.338941", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special business license tax for capital improvements be imposed on any business in the City having gross receipts in excess of $10,000,000, at the rate of seven and one-half cents (7% per $100 of gross receipts, subject to certain maximum limits and reduced by any sales taxes that may be paid by that business to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7234, "fingerprint": "2008|200800548|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800548|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "51afe97a9381e272", "measure_id": "200800548", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain academic excellence by continuing emphasis on math, science, reading and writing; keeping schools from losing qualified teachers; and enhancing well-rounded curriculum, including music and art, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary School District collect an annual education parcel tax of $78 for seven years, with independent community oversight of all expenditures, no funds for administrator salaries, an exemption for senior citizens 65 and over and all funds staying in local schools to protect high-quality education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1316, "no_votes": 556, "total_votes": 1872, "percent_yes": 70.29914000000001, "percent_no": 29.70085999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.306676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.339674", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain academic excellence by continuing emphasis on math, science, reading and writing; keeping schools from losing qualified teachers; and enhancing well-rounded curriculum, including music and art, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary School District collect an annual education parcel tax of $78 for seven years, with independent community oversight of all expenditures, no funds for administrator salaries, an exemption for senior citizens 65 and over and all funds staying in local schools to protect high-quality education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7231, "fingerprint": "2008|200800419|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800419|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f40ed39e40039b7d", "measure_id": "200800419", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a Charter Amendment requiring majority voter approval for future development of the Cargill Lands, consisting of approximately 1,450 acres east of Highway 101 and south of Seaport Boulevard, with exemptions for takings and vested rights, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13213, "no_votes": 13733, "total_votes": 26946, "percent_yes": 49.035108, "percent_no": 50.964892, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.305787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.339124", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Charter Amendment requiring majority voter approval for future development of the Cargill Lands, consisting of approximately 1,450 acres east of Highway 101 and south of Seaport Boulevard, with exemptions for takings and vested rights, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7232, "fingerprint": "2008|200800420|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800420|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "93da9a67fb99c48b", "measure_id": "200800420", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a Charter Amendment requiring two-thirds voter ratification of legislative acts approving certain land uses in areas of the City designated as \u201cPark\u201d, \u201cUnimproved Areas (Land or Water)\u201d, \u201cFuture Development Expanding Limits of Urbanization\u201d, \u201cControlled Waterways (Redwood Shores Area)\u201d, or \u201cSan Francisco Bay Water\u201d in the General Plan or designated as \u201cTidal Plain\u201d or \u201cRedwood Shores Bay Front\u201d in the Zoning Code, with exemptions for housing obligations, takings and vested rights, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10520, "no_votes": 17594, "total_votes": 28114, "percent_yes": 37.41908, "percent_no": 62.58092, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.306065", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.339307", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Charter Amendment requiring two-thirds voter ratification of legislative acts approving certain land uses in areas of the City designated as \u201cPark\u201d, \u201cUnimproved Areas (Land or Water)\u201d, \u201cFuture Development Expanding Limits of Urbanization\u201d, \u201cControlled Waterways (Redwood Shores Area)\u201d, or \u201cSan Francisco Bay Water\u201d in the General Plan or designated as \u201cTidal Plain\u201d or \u201cRedwood Shores Bay Front\u201d in the Zoning Code, with exemptions for housing obligations, takings and vested rights, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7235, "fingerprint": "2008|200800549|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800549|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0db898f81ec1126a", "measure_id": "200800549", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize the elementary and middle schools in the Millbrae Elementary School District, repairing or replacing aging roofs, worn plumbing, heating, ventilating, lighting and electrical systems with new, energy efficient systems, increasing student access to computers and technology and creating a dedicated technology fund, shall the District issue $30 million in bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit with all expenditures audited and reviewed by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6646, "no_votes": 2920, "total_votes": 9566, "percent_yes": 69.47523, "percent_no": 30.524770000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.307134", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.339854", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize the elementary and middle schools in the Millbrae Elementary School District, repairing or replacing aging roofs, worn plumbing, heating, ventilating, lighting and electrical systems with new, energy efficient systems, increasing student access to computers and technology and creating a dedicated technology fund, shall the District issue $30 million in bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit with all expenditures audited and reviewed by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7233, "fingerprint": "2008|200800547|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800547|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "947858f962603e5b", "measure_id": "200800547", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain educational excellence, high academic standards, small classes, improve reading and writing, offer music, art language, provide student access to computers, maintain science, math and other classroom needs, attract/retain high quality teachers, shall the Bayshore Elementary School District cause a parcel tax of $96 be levied beginning July 1, 2009 and extending for a period of six [6] years, with annual adjustment for inflation, with exemptions for residents 65 and older and with public accountability measures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1066, "no_votes": 410, "total_votes": 1476, "percent_yes": 72.22222000000001, "percent_no": 27.777779999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.306372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.339494", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain educational excellence, high academic standards, small classes, improve reading and writing, offer music, art language, provide student access to computers, maintain science, math and other classroom needs, attract/retain high quality teachers, shall the Bayshore Elementary School District cause a parcel tax of $96 be levied beginning July 1, 2009 and extending for a period of six [6] years, with annual adjustment for inflation, with exemptions for residents 65 and older and with public accountability measures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7241, "fingerprint": "2008|200800267|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800267|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "193f4d861f6371ec", "measure_id": "200800267", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters approve an ordinance to: repair potholes; provide safe routes to school; widen Highway 101 south of Santa Barbara to relieve congestion; implement local street/highway safety improvements; expand public bus services/passenger rail, with increased senior/disabled accessibility; synchronize traffic signals; earthquake retrofit bridges/overpasses; increase pedestrian/bike safety; by continuing, but not increasing the existing half-cent sales tax for 30 years with local control, independent financial audits and public review of expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 130278, "no_votes": 34309, "total_votes": 164587, "percent_yes": 79.15449, "percent_no": 20.845510000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.308953", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.340950", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters approve an ordinance to: repair potholes; provide safe routes to school; widen Highway 101 south of Santa Barbara to relieve congestion; implement local street/highway safety improvements; expand public bus services/passenger rail, with increased senior/disabled accessibility; synchronize traffic signals; earthquake retrofit bridges/overpasses; increase pedestrian/bike safety; by continuing, but not increasing the existing half-cent sales tax for 30 years with local control, independent financial audits and public review of expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7245, "fingerprint": "2008|200800424|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800424|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "03fc45e36189f52d", "measure_id": "200800424", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the general transient occupancy tax increasing from 10% to 11% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1193, "no_votes": 1159, "total_votes": 2352, "percent_yes": 50.72279, "percent_no": 49.27721, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.310161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.341669", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the general transient occupancy tax increasing from 10% to 11% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7246, "fingerprint": "2008|200800551|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800551|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "e5a8b4d4cd753e19", "measure_id": "200800551", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Cold Spring School District be authorized to repair, renovate, upgrade, and modernize Cold Spring School; by issuing $2,440,000 in bonds within legal interest rates with spending annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds are spent locally within the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 987, "no_votes": 666, "total_votes": 1653, "percent_yes": 59.70962, "percent_no": 40.29038, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.310454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.341848", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Cold Spring School District be authorized to repair, renovate, upgrade, and modernize Cold Spring School; by issuing $2,440,000 in bonds within legal interest rates with spending annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds are spent locally within the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7242, "fingerprint": "2008|200800421|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800421|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "065cb9d23598b437", "measure_id": "200800421", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Should the Buellton General Plan be amended, until December 31, 2025, to prohibit (with limited exceptions) changes to existing city limits or the provision of water or sewer services beyond the existing city limits of Buellton, except by another initiative election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1427, "no_votes": 657, "total_votes": 2084, "percent_yes": 68.47409, "percent_no": 31.525909999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.309261", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.341128", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Should the Buellton General Plan be amended, until December 31, 2025, to prohibit (with limited exceptions) changes to existing city limits or the provision of water or sewer services beyond the existing city limits of Buellton, except by another initiative election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7243, "fingerprint": "2008|200800422|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800422|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "3c068994d28507e3", "measure_id": "200800422", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Buellton General Plan be amended, until December 31, 2014, to prohibit (with limited exceptions) changes to existing city limits or the provision of water or sewer serices beyond the existing city limits of Buellton, except by another initiative election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1579, "no_votes": 479, "total_votes": 2058, "percent_yes": 76.724976, "percent_no": 23.275024000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.309580", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.341305", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Buellton General Plan be amended, until December 31, 2014, to prohibit (with limited exceptions) changes to existing city limits or the provision of water or sewer serices beyond the existing city limits of Buellton, except by another initiative election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7244, "fingerprint": "2008|200800423|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800423|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "a0644d82e163b34d", "measure_id": "200800423", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Santa Barbara adopt an ordinance reducing the telecommunications utility users tax from 6% to 5.75%, to fund for police, fire, 911, parks/recreation, gang prevention and after school programs for at-risk youth, senior services, street repairs, public transit, and other general fund services; exempting low-income seniors; prohibiting a tax rate increase without voter approval; requiring equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology, annual audits, public review of expenditures and local control of all revenue?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26206, "no_votes": 10713, "total_votes": 36919, "percent_yes": 70.98242, "percent_no": 29.017579999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.309890", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.341481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Santa Barbara adopt an ordinance reducing the telecommunications utility users tax from 6% to 5.75%, to fund for police, fire, 911, parks/recreation, gang prevention and after school programs for at-risk youth, senior services, street repairs, public transit, and other general fund services; exempting low-income seniors; prohibiting a tax rate increase without voter approval; requiring equal treatment of taxpayers regardless of technology, annual audits, public review of expenditures and local control of all revenue?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7248, "fingerprint": "2008|200800553|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800553|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "f10521b087c68f84", "measure_id": "200800553", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our schools; protect the quality of education; enhance math, science, and technology education; supplement music, arts, foreign language and theater programs at the secondary level; and restore math class size reduction; shall Santa Barbara High School District be authorized to implement a $23 annual parcel tax for four years, with an available exemption for senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, without administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59747, "no_votes": 24104, "total_votes": 83851, "percent_yes": 71.25377, "percent_no": 28.746229999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.311102", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.342208", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our schools; protect the quality of education; enhance math, science, and technology education; supplement music, arts, foreign language and theater programs at the secondary level; and restore math class size reduction; shall Santa Barbara High School District be authorized to implement a $23 annual parcel tax for four years, with an available exemption for senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, without administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7247, "fingerprint": "2008|200800552|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800552|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "29e8a9b54bf972d4", "measure_id": "200800552", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our schools; protect the quality of education; enhance math, science, and technology education and offer classroom music programs at the elementary school level, shall Santa Barbara Elementary School District be authorized to implement a $27 annual parcel tax for four years, with an available exemption for senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, without administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25914, "no_votes": 10005, "total_votes": 35919, "percent_yes": 72.14566, "percent_no": 27.854339999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.310796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.342027", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To offset severe state budget cuts to our schools; protect the quality of education; enhance math, science, and technology education and offer classroom music programs at the elementary school level, shall Santa Barbara Elementary School District be authorized to implement a $27 annual parcel tax for four years, with an available exemption for senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, without administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7239, "fingerprint": "2008|200800087|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800087|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "b45bba28db86abeb", "measure_id": "200800087", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Cold Springs School District be authorized to repair, renovate, upgrade, and modernize Cold Springs School; construct new classrooms, restrooms and educational facilities; and improve student safety and accessibility by issuing $8,750,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with spending reviewed annually by a citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally within the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 670, "no_votes": 666, "total_votes": 1336, "percent_yes": 50.149703, "percent_no": 49.850297, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.308306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.340590", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Cold Springs School District be authorized to repair, renovate, upgrade, and modernize Cold Springs School; construct new classrooms, restrooms and educational facilities; and improve student safety and accessibility by issuing $8,750,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with spending reviewed annually by a citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds spent locally within the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7237, "fingerprint": "2008|200800012|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800012|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "4c90f41300b647b8", "measure_id": "200800012", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special property tax of $35.15 per parcel of property be approved to preserve, complete and support Santa Barbara County's Trauma System and Emergency Medical Services Network in order to provide rapid emergency medical and trauma care to all people residing in the county?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61402, "no_votes": 53091, "total_votes": 114493, "percent_yes": 53.62948, "percent_no": 46.37052, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.307712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.340226", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special property tax of $35.15 per parcel of property be approved to preserve, complete and support Santa Barbara County's Trauma System and Emergency Medical Services Network in order to provide rapid emergency medical and trauma care to all people residing in the county?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7238, "fingerprint": "2008|200800043|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800043|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "12f79daf306df8fe", "measure_id": "200800043", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase the number of on-duty firefighters and police officers on patrol, to target gang violence and illegal drugs, retain experienced police and firefighters, improve 911 response times, purchase equipment and improve public safety facilities while maintaining general fund expenditures for Police and Fire, shall the City enact a one-half cent sales tax, dedicated to improve public safety in Lompoc, with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4576, "no_votes": 3677, "total_votes": 8253, "percent_yes": 55.44650599999999, "percent_no": 44.55349400000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.307981", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.340407", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase the number of on-duty firefighters and police officers on patrol, to target gang violence and illegal drugs, retain experienced police and firefighters, improve 911 response times, purchase equipment and improve public safety facilities while maintaining general fund expenditures for Police and Fire, shall the City enact a one-half cent sales tax, dedicated to improve public safety in Lompoc, with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7240, "fingerprint": "2008|200800205|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800205|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "028c46a2be203232", "measure_id": "200800205", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality, affordable, local higher education at Santa Barbara City College, improve academic facilities for students transferring to four-year colleges, improve academic facilities for nursing, health care, job training and other careers, renovate aging classrooms, upgrade/construct facilities and aquire equipment, upgrade energy efficiency/sustainability and disabled persons' access shall Santa Barbara Community College District issue $77,242,012 in bonds, at legal rates, qualify for State matching funds, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28397, "no_votes": 11911, "total_votes": 40308, "percent_yes": 70.45003, "percent_no": 29.549970000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.308631", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.340770", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality, affordable, local higher education at Santa Barbara City College, improve academic facilities for students transferring to four-year colleges, improve academic facilities for nursing, health care, job training and other careers, renovate aging classrooms, upgrade/construct facilities and aquire equipment, upgrade energy efficiency/sustainability and disabled persons' access shall Santa Barbara Community College District issue $77,242,012 in bonds, at legal rates, qualify for State matching funds, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11629, "fingerprint": "2008|200800268|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800268|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f6ea1d6afb91eb7b", "measure_id": "200800268", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To prevent state mandated shutdown of one-half of Santa Clara Valley Medical Center's beds; closure of SCVMC's trauma, burn center; and, loss of disaster reponse, by rebuilding, and improving earthquake safety of the hospital, meeting state seismic laws, and help replace closed medical facilities in downtown San Jose, shall the County of Santa Clara issue $840 million in general obligation bonds with independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 475882, "no_votes": 133272, "total_votes": 609154, "percent_yes": 78.12179, "percent_no": 21.878209999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.358474", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.314919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.344361", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent state mandated shutdown of one-half of Santa Clara Valley Medical Center's beds; closure of SCVMC's trauma, burn center; and, loss of disaster reponse, by rebuilding, and improving earthquake safety of the hospital, meeting state seismic laws, and help replace closed medical facilities in downtown San Jose, shall the County of Santa Clara issue $840 million in general obligation bonds with independent citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11628, "fingerprint": "2008|200800210|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800210|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "55289b0a439ff10a", "measure_id": "200800210", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe and modern schools; accommodate enrollment growth; upgrade aging classrooms, libraries, computer and science labs; repair or replace roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; improve fire alarms and school security; meet current earthquake standards; provide current technology; and replace old portables with permanent classrooms, shall Palo Alto Unified School District issue $378 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent oversight and bond tax rates estimated not to exceed the current rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14074, "no_votes": 4066, "total_votes": 18140, "percent_yes": 77.585447, "percent_no": 22.414552999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.358289", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.314627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.344182", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe and modern schools; accommodate enrollment growth; upgrade aging classrooms, libraries, computer and science labs; repair or replace roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; improve fire alarms and school security; meet current earthquake standards; provide current technology; and replace old portables with permanent classrooms, shall Palo Alto Unified School District issue $378 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent oversight and bond tax rates estimated not to exceed the current rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7251, "fingerprint": "2008|200800046|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800046|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "7ba85493a2c12cbd", "measure_id": "200800046", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Clara adopt Resolution No. 07-7430, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Clara, California, Approving The General Plan Amendment For The Santa Clara Gardens Project (90 N. Winchester Blvd.)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15119, "no_votes": 10148, "total_votes": 25267, "percent_yes": 59.836940000000006, "percent_no": 40.163059999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.312044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.342749", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Clara adopt Resolution No. 07-7430, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Clara, California, Approving The General Plan Amendment For The Santa Clara Gardens Project (90 N. Winchester Blvd.)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11625, "fingerprint": "2008|200800207|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800207|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1c6becc8033b390d", "measure_id": "200800207", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To benefit Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook and Monta Vista High Schools by creating a technology fund to upgrade classroom computers and technology; building science labs; improving energy efficiency; adding solar power; building classrooms to avoid overcrowding; improving physical education and athletic facilities; and replacing aging heating, lighting and electrical systems; shall the Fremont Union High School District issue $198,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with all expenditures monitored by an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22100, "no_votes": 10849, "total_votes": 32949, "percent_yes": 67.07336000000001, "percent_no": 32.92663999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.357660", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.313773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.343644", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To benefit Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook and Monta Vista High Schools by creating a technology fund to upgrade classroom computers and technology; building science labs; improving energy efficiency; adding solar power; building classrooms to avoid overcrowding; improving physical education and athletic facilities; and replacing aging heating, lighting and electrical systems; shall the Fremont Union High School District issue $198,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with all expenditures monitored by an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7252, "fingerprint": "2008|200800047|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800047|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8185f759f63dee98", "measure_id": "200800047", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Clara adopt Resolution No. 07-7432, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Clara, California, Rezoning The Parcels Located At 90 N. Winchester Boulevard And Granting A Density Bonus For The Senior Housing Project For The Santa Clara Gardens Project?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15163, "no_votes": 10176, "total_votes": 25339, "percent_yes": 59.84056, "percent_no": 40.15944, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.312346", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.342928", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Clara adopt Resolution No. 07-7432, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Clara, California, Rezoning The Parcels Located At 90 N. Winchester Boulevard And Granting A Density Bonus For The Senior Housing Project For The Santa Clara Gardens Project?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11627, "fingerprint": "2008|200800209|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800209|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ce7f611707d27615", "measure_id": "200800209", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue local school funding, reduce the impact of budget cuts, attract/retain teachers/staff, support students struggling with the basics, maintain textbooks/instructional materials, keep class sizes small, maintain music/art education, keep school libraries open, and fund other educational programs, shall Mountain View Whisman School District extend and increase its expiring tax based on square footage of parcels described in the voter pamphlet, for 8 years with independent oversight, exemptions for seniors and all funds staying locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8594, "no_votes": 2083, "total_votes": 10677, "percent_yes": 80.490774, "percent_no": 19.509225999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.358101", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.314356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.344003", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue local school funding, reduce the impact of budget cuts, attract/retain teachers/staff, support students struggling with the basics, maintain textbooks/instructional materials, keep class sizes small, maintain music/art education, keep school libraries open, and fund other educational programs, shall Mountain View Whisman School District extend and increase its expiring tax based on square footage of parcels described in the voter pamphlet, for 8 years with independent oversight, exemptions for seniors and all funds staying locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7249, "fingerprint": "2008|200800044|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800044|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ab68a047dfec137b", "measure_id": "200800044", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7080, "no_votes": 4360, "total_votes": 11440, "percent_yes": 61.88811, "percent_no": 38.11189, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.311416", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.342386", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7250, "fingerprint": "2008|200800045|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800045|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5337de2bcea6bf70", "measure_id": "200800045", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Los Gatos be required to construct and operate a skatepark for the free use of its citizens on its Miles Avenue property, generally conforming with plans and specifications approved by the Town, the one-time cost to design and construct not to exceed $1,000,000, paid from existing Town funds, the annual operating cost not to exceed $50,000, said costs to be reduced by any valuable contributions made by others?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4163, "no_votes": 8001, "total_votes": 12164, "percent_yes": 34.223940000000006, "percent_no": 65.77606, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.311747", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.342570", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Los Gatos be required to construct and operate a skatepark for the free use of its citizens on its Miles Avenue property, generally conforming with plans and specifications approved by the Town, the one-time cost to design and construct not to exceed $1,000,000, paid from existing Town funds, the annual operating cost not to exceed $50,000, said costs to be reduced by any valuable contributions made by others?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11630, "fingerprint": "2008|200800426|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800426|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c730d8acf31e1984", "measure_id": "200800426", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to consolidate with the countywide elections and to help reduce the City's election costs, shall the Charter Section 1400 be amended to provide that the City's general municipal election shall be held in each even-numbered year commencing with the year 2010 and extending the existing Council terms by one year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9007, "no_votes": 4682, "total_votes": 13689, "percent_yes": 65.79735, "percent_no": 34.202650000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.358864", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.315485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.344723", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to consolidate with the countywide elections and to help reduce the City's election costs, shall the Charter Section 1400 be amended to provide that the City's general municipal election shall be held in each even-numbered year commencing with the year 2010 and extending the existing Council terms by one year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11626, "fingerprint": "2008|200800208|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800208|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cea3465364c38ec0", "measure_id": "200800208", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high academic achievement for local students by retaining quality teachers, keeping small class sizes, and maintaining science, literacy, art, music and other programs, shall the Los Gatos Union School District be authorized to renew its expiring parcel tax of $290 per year per parcel, for six years, without increase, with an exemption available for senior citizens and disabled persons, with citizen oversight, and every dollar staying in Los Gatos schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6142, "no_votes": 1169, "total_votes": 7311, "percent_yes": 84.01039, "percent_no": 15.989609999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.357894", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.314074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.343824", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high academic achievement for local students by retaining quality teachers, keeping small class sizes, and maintaining science, literacy, art, music and other programs, shall the Los Gatos Union School District be authorized to renew its expiring parcel tax of $290 per year per parcel, for six years, without increase, with an exemption available for senior citizens and disabled persons, with citizen oversight, and every dollar staying in Los Gatos schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7253, "fingerprint": "2008|200800088|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800088|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d255543dbe4fd975", "measure_id": "200800088", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve computer/science labs, provide greater safety and security, repair, equip, construct, and acquire classrooms and facilities at Andrew Hill, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Yerba Buena, W.C. Overfelt, and District adult, alternative, and charter schools, and acquire property for new schools, shall East Side Union High School District issue $349,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates so long as spending is reviewed by an independent oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68929, "no_votes": 27630, "total_votes": 96559, "percent_yes": 71.38537000000001, "percent_no": 28.61462999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.312652", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.343106", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve computer/science labs, provide greater safety and security, repair, equip, construct, and acquire classrooms and facilities at Andrew Hill, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Yerba Buena, W.C. Overfelt, and District adult, alternative, and charter schools, and acquire property for new schools, shall East Side Union High School District issue $349,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates so long as spending is reviewed by an independent oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7256, "fingerprint": "2008|200800427|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800427|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5eb318912beadea3", "measure_id": "200800427", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To replace the overcrowded, outdated Gilroy Library building, with a larger Library that meets current earthquake safety standards, located near public transit, City Hall and the Senior Center; provide services for a growing population; accommodate double the number of library books/materials; shall the City of Gilroy issue 37 million dollars in general obligation bonds at legal interest rates, subject to independent audit and citizens oversight with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10029, "no_votes": 4487, "total_votes": 14516, "percent_yes": 69.08928, "percent_no": 30.910719999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.315789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.344902", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace the overcrowded, outdated Gilroy Library building, with a larger Library that meets current earthquake safety standards, located near public transit, City Hall and the Senior Center; provide services for a growing population; accommodate double the number of library books/materials; shall the City of Gilroy issue 37 million dollars in general obligation bonds at legal interest rates, subject to independent audit and citizens oversight with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11631, "fingerprint": "2008|200800428|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800428|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "06ad59ef70868683", "measure_id": "200800428", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help protect general City services including public safety, shall the City of Morgan Hill establish a two percent general utility users' tax on the use of gas, electricity, water, telecommunications, video, sewer, and refuse hauling services, with low-income exemptions, to be reviewed by the City Council every two years and terminated if findings are not made that the tax is necessary for the City's financial health?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5103, "no_votes": 9384, "total_votes": 14487, "percent_yes": 35.224685, "percent_no": 64.775315, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.359772", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.316091", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.345084", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help protect general City services including public safety, shall the City of Morgan Hill establish a two percent general utility users' tax on the use of gas, electricity, water, telecommunications, video, sewer, and refuse hauling services, with low-income exemptions, to be reviewed by the City Council every two years and terminated if findings are not made that the tax is necessary for the City's financial health?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11624, "fingerprint": "2008|200800206|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800206|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "08f7b983ef45e2e4", "measure_id": "200800206", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood schools, fix leaky, deteriorated roofs, improve fire safety, repair and upgrade classrooms, improve student safety and security, renovate outdated restrooms, upgrade heating/ventilation/electrical systems for energy efficiency, and computer technology, shall Alum Rock Union Elementary School District issue $179 million of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6901, "no_votes": 1824, "total_votes": 8725, "percent_yes": 79.094553, "percent_no": 20.905446999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.357474", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.313330", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.343464", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood schools, fix leaky, deteriorated roofs, improve fire safety, repair and upgrade classrooms, improve student safety and security, renovate outdated restrooms, upgrade heating/ventilation/electrical systems for energy efficiency, and computer technology, shall Alum Rock Union Elementary School District issue $179 million of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7254, "fingerprint": "2008|200800089|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800089|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8b32e9423d37eb00", "measure_id": "200800089", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2012) the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 2004, thus allowing the district to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 300, "no_votes": 105, "total_votes": 405, "percent_yes": 74.07407, "percent_no": 25.925929999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.312947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.343286", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2012) the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 2004, thus allowing the district to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7257, "fingerprint": "2008|200800429|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800429|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "2bc75e01570af1f2", "measure_id": "200800429", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance to exempt a total of 500 residential allotments in a 20 block area of downtown from the City of Morgan Hill's Residential Development Control System without increasing the population cap of 48,000 in 2020 and to authorize the City Council to adopt policies and procedures implementing the exemptions be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6909, "no_votes": 6919, "total_votes": 13828, "percent_yes": 49.96384, "percent_no": 50.03616, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.316400", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.345268", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance to exempt a total of 500 residential allotments in a 20 block area of downtown from the City of Morgan Hill's Residential Development Control System without increasing the population cap of 48,000 in 2020 and to authorize the City Council to adopt policies and procedures implementing the exemptions be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7258, "fingerprint": "2008|200800430|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800430|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0d833d52f4920d65", "measure_id": "200800430", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to eliminate the 911 fee of $1.75 per telephone line and replace it with a 10% reduced tax of $1.57 with a corresponding reduction for commercial-type trunk lines, to support essential City services such as police, fire, emergency response, parks, and libraries; to continue exemptions for low-income senior citizens or low-income disabled households, subject to existing audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 217976, "no_votes": 62598, "total_votes": 280574, "percent_yes": 77.68931, "percent_no": 22.310689999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.316888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.345447", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to eliminate the 911 fee of $1.75 per telephone line and replace it with a 10% reduced tax of $1.57 with a corresponding reduction for commercial-type trunk lines, to support essential City services such as police, fire, emergency response, parks, and libraries; to continue exemptions for low-income senior citizens or low-income disabled households, subject to existing audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7259, "fingerprint": "2008|200800431|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800431|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e197667420af64b8", "measure_id": "200800431", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the telecommunications users tax rate from 5% to 4.5%; to update the ordinance and apply the tax equally regardless of technology used; in order to support essential City services, such as police, fire, emergency response, street maintenance, parks and libraries; while maintaining current exemptions; subject to existing audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 220146, "no_votes": 56592, "total_votes": 276738, "percent_yes": 79.55033, "percent_no": 20.449669999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.317229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.345627", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the telecommunications users tax rate from 5% to 4.5%; to update the ordinance and apply the tax equally regardless of technology used; in order to support essential City services, such as police, fire, emergency response, street maintenance, parks and libraries; while maintaining current exemptions; subject to existing audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7260, "fingerprint": "2008|200800432|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800432|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5daaf1e03c7c705a", "measure_id": "200800432", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve fire suppression, emergency medical services and increase essential emergency facilities available for disaster response within the Willow Glen area, shall the City be authorized to construct a single-company fire station on up to 3/4 of an acre on a portion of the Lincoln Glen Park parking lot?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 177607, "no_votes": 97634, "total_votes": 275241, "percent_yes": 64.527816, "percent_no": 35.472184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.317581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.345807", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve fire suppression, emergency medical services and increase essential emergency facilities available for disaster response within the Willow Glen area, shall the City be authorized to construct a single-company fire station on up to 3/4 of an acre on a portion of the Lincoln Glen Park parking lot?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7261, "fingerprint": "2008|200800433|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800433|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f8b5ad7fed2e3c3e", "measure_id": "200800433", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve parks and enhance recreational opportunities through agreements that support long term financial investments, shall the City Charter be amended to allow the City Council to approve park use agreements with non-City entities for up to 25 years in parks larger than five acres, requiring that the agreements enhance the recreational purposes of the park?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 198999, "no_votes": 75093, "total_votes": 274092, "percent_yes": 72.602993, "percent_no": 27.397007000000002, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.317899", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.345986", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve parks and enhance recreational opportunities through agreements that support long term financial investments, shall the City Charter be amended to allow the City Council to approve park use agreements with non-City entities for up to 25 years in parks larger than five acres, requiring that the agreements enhance the recreational purposes of the park?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7262, "fingerprint": "2008|200800434|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800434|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d701d32e948a0a8b", "measure_id": "200800434", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide additional space to expand library collections, add new children's and group program areas, replace outdated lighting, provide modern ventilation and air conditioning systems, ensure seismic safety and enhance disabled access, shall the City of Palo Alto issue bonds up to $76,000,000 to construct a new energy-efficient Mitchell Park Library and Community Center, expand and renovate Main Library, and renovate Downtown Library, with annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21894, "no_votes": 9672, "total_votes": 31566, "percent_yes": 69.35944, "percent_no": 30.640559999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.318242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.346166", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide additional space to expand library collections, add new children's and group program areas, replace outdated lighting, provide modern ventilation and air conditioning systems, ensure seismic safety and enhance disabled access, shall the City of Palo Alto issue bonds up to $76,000,000 to construct a new energy-efficient Mitchell Park Library and Community Center, expand and renovate Main Library, and renovate Downtown Library, with annual audits and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7255, "fingerprint": "2008|200800425|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800425|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e72e1d327a3ee9e3", "measure_id": "200800425", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to maintain and protect City services and facilities, such as City streets and pothole repair, fire protection and 911 emergency medical services, police patrols, neighborhood watch and crime prevention programs, the Community Center, recreation programs, and parks, shall the City of Campbell be authorized to enact a one-quarter cent sales tax, with all proceeds placed in the City's General Fund with independent annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10657, "no_votes": 4451, "total_votes": 15108, "percent_yes": 70.53878999999999, "percent_no": 29.46121000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.315209", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.344544", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain and protect City services and facilities, such as City streets and pothole repair, fire protection and 911 emergency medical services, police patrols, neighborhood watch and crime prevention programs, the Community Center, recreation programs, and parks, shall the City of Campbell be authorized to enact a one-quarter cent sales tax, with all proceeds placed in the City's General Fund with independent annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7267, "fingerprint": "2008|200800558|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800558|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a2ae14f8cc834895", "measure_id": "200800558", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For construction of Christopher High School, construct and modernize aging classroom, libraries, fire safety and security systems and school buildings for safe, secure and improved learning environments, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation, roofing, plumbing, and technology systems and computer equipment, shall Gilroy Unified School District issue $150 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizens' oversight, no funds for administrative salaries, and bond tax rates estimated to be lower than the combined existing tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11989, "no_votes": 5752, "total_votes": 17741, "percent_yes": 67.57793, "percent_no": 32.422070000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.319874", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.347064", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For construction of Christopher High School, construct and modernize aging classroom, libraries, fire safety and security systems and school buildings for safe, secure and improved learning environments, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation, roofing, plumbing, and technology systems and computer equipment, shall Gilroy Unified School District issue $150 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits, independent citizens' oversight, no funds for administrative salaries, and bond tax rates estimated to be lower than the combined existing tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7264, "fingerprint": "2008|200800555|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800555|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f1c3f82c454512bd", "measure_id": "200800555", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To restore funds cut by state government with local high school funds that cannot be taken by the state; maintain small classes, retain qualified teachers, maintain/expand academic programs including science, math, English, Advanced Placement, music, art and vocational training, shall Campbell Union High School District renew - with no tax increase - an existing $85 annual assessment for 5 years, with senior exemptions, independent citizens' fiscal oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, and every dollar used to preserve quality education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62903, "no_votes": 16287, "total_votes": 79190, "percent_yes": 79.43301000000001, "percent_no": 20.56698999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.318923", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.346526", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore funds cut by state government with local high school funds that cannot be taken by the state; maintain small classes, retain qualified teachers, maintain/expand academic programs including science, math, English, Advanced Placement, music, art and vocational training, shall Campbell Union High School District renew - with no tax increase - an existing $85 annual assessment for 5 years, with senior exemptions, independent citizens' fiscal oversight, no funds for administrators' salaries, and every dollar used to preserve quality education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7268, "fingerprint": "2008|200800559|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800559|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "93e85f32879142a2", "measure_id": "200800559", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide a safe, secure, and improved learning environment for all elementary and intermediate students, improve fire safety and security systems, rehabilitate electrical, heating, ventilation, roofing and plumbing systems, construct gyms, increase energy efficiency and add solar power, make schools accessible, and upgrade technology systems and equipment, shall the Oak Grove School District issue $125 million in bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit, with a citizens' oversight committee to review expenditures and progress?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25589, "no_votes": 8550, "total_votes": 34139, "percent_yes": 74.95533, "percent_no": 25.044669999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.320216", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.347245", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a safe, secure, and improved learning environment for all elementary and intermediate students, improve fire safety and security systems, rehabilitate electrical, heating, ventilation, roofing and plumbing systems, construct gyms, increase energy efficiency and add solar power, make schools accessible, and upgrade technology systems and equipment, shall the Oak Grove School District issue $125 million in bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit, with a citizens' oversight committee to review expenditures and progress?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7265, "fingerprint": "2008|200800556|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800556|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "2981518eb1a18018", "measure_id": "200800556", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance student achievement in local schools through maintaining the class size reduction program, providing individual attention from teachers, enhancing science and math instruction, maintaining safe schools, and bringing back music and arts programs, shall the Evergreen School District assess an annual parcel tax of $90 per parcel, for five years, with citizen oversight and independent audits, an exemption for senior citizens, and no money for district administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24238, "no_votes": 8581, "total_votes": 32819, "percent_yes": 73.85356, "percent_no": 26.14644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.319236", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.346706", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance student achievement in local schools through maintaining the class size reduction program, providing individual attention from teachers, enhancing science and math instruction, maintaining safe schools, and bringing back music and arts programs, shall the Evergreen School District assess an annual parcel tax of $90 per parcel, for five years, with citizen oversight and independent audits, an exemption for senior citizens, and no money for district administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7266, "fingerprint": "2008|200800557|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800557|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "25e56027135897fd", "measure_id": "200800557", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve overall quality of public education and enhance student achievement in local schools by enhancing math, science and literacy instrucution; ensuring small class sizes in kindergarten through third grade; retaining teachers and expanding reading, counseling and tutoring programs for at-risk students, shall Franklin-McKinley School District assess an annual parcel tax of $72 per parcel for nine years with citizen oversight, independent audits and an exemption for senior citizen homeowners?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13965, "no_votes": 5008, "total_votes": 18973, "percent_yes": 73.604596, "percent_no": 26.395404, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.319526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.346885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve overall quality of public education and enhance student achievement in local schools by enhancing math, science and literacy instrucution; ensuring small class sizes in kindergarten through third grade; retaining teachers and expanding reading, counseling and tutoring programs for at-risk students, shall Franklin-McKinley School District assess an annual parcel tax of $72 per parcel for nine years with citizen oversight, independent audits and an exemption for senior citizen homeowners?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7269, "fingerprint": "2008|200800560|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800560|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f5cef602fd26d21c", "measure_id": "200800560", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide a quality education for Patterson students and prepare them for college or their career by: upgrading an repairing classrooms that are more than forty years old, adding new technology, adding science and career training classrooms giving students workforce skills, relieving overcrowded schools, shall Patterson Joint Unified School District issue $50,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19, "no_votes": 25, "total_votes": 44, "percent_yes": 43.18182, "percent_no": 56.81818, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.320568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.347428", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a quality education for Patterson students and prepare them for college or their career by: upgrading an repairing classrooms that are more than forty years old, adding new technology, adding science and career training classrooms giving students workforce skills, relieving overcrowded schools, shall Patterson Joint Unified School District issue $50,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7263, "fingerprint": "2008|200800554|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800554|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "fcee71385e4ee827", "measure_id": "200800554", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent deep cuts and maintain quality education at our neighborhood schools by attracting and retaining qualified teahcers; maintaining reading/math tutoring; keeping school libraries open; providing hands-on science instruction; keeping classroom technology updated; and funding programs that enhance student achievement, shall Berryessa Union School District levy $79 dollars per parcel annually for 5 years with an exemption for seniors, a citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries and all money benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18074, "no_votes": 6848, "total_votes": 24922, "percent_yes": 72.52227, "percent_no": 27.477729999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.318604", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.346346", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent deep cuts and maintain quality education at our neighborhood schools by attracting and retaining qualified teahcers; maintaining reading/math tutoring; keeping school libraries open; providing hands-on science instruction; keeping classroom technology updated; and funding programs that enhance student achievement, shall Berryessa Union School District levy $79 dollars per parcel annually for 5 years with an exemption for seniors, a citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries and all money benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7281, "fingerprint": "2008|200800561|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800561|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "5d2b74e92dfdaf43", "measure_id": "200800561", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education, including science, art, and music, provide reading and math tutoring programs, attract and retain qualified teachers, keep school libraries open, preserve small class sizes, and provide after school programs to keep children safe, shall Live Oak School District be authorized to implement an annual $84 education parcel tax for nine years, exempting senior citizens, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrative salaries and all money directly benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7807, "no_votes": 2323, "total_votes": 10130, "percent_yes": 77.068114, "percent_no": 22.931886000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.324481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.350847", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education, including science, art, and music, provide reading and math tutoring programs, attract and retain qualified teachers, keep school libraries open, preserve small class sizes, and provide after school programs to keep children safe, shall Live Oak School District be authorized to implement an annual $84 education parcel tax for nine years, exempting senior citizens, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrative salaries and all money directly benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7277, "fingerprint": "2008|200800269|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800269|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "b7e155d5f5c2d5c0", "measure_id": "200800269", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors repeal the existing Emergency Response Fee on telephone land lines that currently finances 9-1-1 services, and be authorized to replace the fee with a tax in the same amount per access line on land lines and cellular lines in the unincorporated area of the County so as to enable the Board of Supervisors to allocate additional funding for public services including public safety and 9-1-1 services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31313, "no_votes": 32501, "total_votes": 63814, "percent_yes": 49.06917, "percent_no": 50.93083, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.323230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.349744", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors repeal the existing Emergency Response Fee on telephone land lines that currently finances 9-1-1 services, and be authorized to replace the fee with a tax in the same amount per access line on land lines and cellular lines in the unincorporated area of the County so as to enable the Board of Supervisors to allocate additional funding for public services including public safety and 9-1-1 services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7280, "fingerprint": "2008|200800437|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800437|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a92411f6f2ac35f3", "measure_id": "200800437", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City replace the existing 911 Emergency Response Fee now paid by the Watsonville residents on City telephone land lines with a general tax on City telephone subscribers of the same amount of $2.05 per month? The tax would reduce further budget cuts and allow the City Council to provide additional funding to public safety including the 911 Emergency Center and other General Fund programs.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5110, "no_votes": 5760, "total_votes": 10870, "percent_yes": 47.01012, "percent_no": 52.98988, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.324166", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.350577", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City replace the existing 911 Emergency Response Fee now paid by the Watsonville residents on City telephone land lines with a general tax on City telephone subscribers of the same amount of $2.05 per month? The tax would reduce further budget cuts and allow the City Council to provide additional funding to public safety including the 911 Emergency Center and other General Fund programs.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7278, "fingerprint": "2008|200800435|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800435|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "e5e540c802c7aeb4", "measure_id": "200800435", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the 2004 City of Capitola sales tax increase of one quarter of one percent, which is scheduled to sunset in 2010, be extended until December 31, 2017, in order to maintain general services including public safety and street improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3317, "no_votes": 1721, "total_votes": 5038, "percent_yes": 65.83962, "percent_no": 34.16038, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.323574", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.350020", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the 2004 City of Capitola sales tax increase of one quarter of one percent, which is scheduled to sunset in 2010, be extended until December 31, 2017, in order to maintain general services including public safety and street improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7279, "fingerprint": "2008|200800436|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800436|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "598231697312b5d4", "measure_id": "200800436", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect public health and the environment by reducing pollution, trash, toxics and dangerous bacteria in our river; bay and ocean; helping to keep beaches clean; protecting fish and wildlife habitat; shall the City of Santa Cruz adopt a Clean River, Beaches and Ocean Tax, with revenues spent locally under independent citizen oversight? The annual rates will be $28 for single-family parcels, $94 for other developed parcels, and $10 for undeveloped parcels.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23112, "no_votes": 7200, "total_votes": 30312, "percent_yes": 76.24703000000001, "percent_no": 23.75296999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.323860", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.350294", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect public health and the environment by reducing pollution, trash, toxics and dangerous bacteria in our river; bay and ocean; helping to keep beaches clean; protecting fish and wildlife habitat; shall the City of Santa Cruz adopt a Clean River, Beaches and Ocean Tax, with revenues spent locally under independent citizen oversight? The annual rates will be $28 for single-family parcels, $94 for other developed parcels, and $10 for undeveloped parcels.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7270, "fingerprint": "2008|200800090|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800090|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "8b32e9423d37eb00", "measure_id": "200800090", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2012) the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 2004, thus allowing the district to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1170, "no_votes": 410, "total_votes": 1580, "percent_yes": 74.050635, "percent_no": 25.949365, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.320883", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.347732", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2012) the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 2004, thus allowing the district to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7271, "fingerprint": "2008|200800091|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800091|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "035fec55f929e531", "measure_id": "200800091", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct and improve school facilities, including rebuilding the high school library recently destroyed by a fire with a modern facility and improved access to technology, improving the performing arts for school and community use, constructing additional classrooms, and improving playgrounds and security at each campus by issuing $18,900,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6298, "no_votes": 4154, "total_votes": 10452, "percent_yes": 60.25641, "percent_no": 39.74359, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.321227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.348040", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct and improve school facilities, including rebuilding the high school library recently destroyed by a fire with a modern facility and improved access to technology, improving the performing arts for school and community use, constructing additional classrooms, and improving playgrounds and security at each campus by issuing $18,900,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7272, "fingerprint": "2008|200800092|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800092|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "7d5d83358e781368", "measure_id": "200800092", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce class size in all elementary grades, support achievement in science, reading, writing, and the arts, and fund school libraries and literacy instruction, shall Santa Cruz City Elementary School District continue its expiring parcel tax for nine years at an annual rate of $105/parcel, exempting parcels owned/occupied by senior citizens (65+)? An independent oversight committee will audit spending, with every dollar staying in this community to support local elementary schools and no funds used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17952, "no_votes": 4450, "total_votes": 22402, "percent_yes": 80.135703, "percent_no": 19.864296999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.321595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.348327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce class size in all elementary grades, support achievement in science, reading, writing, and the arts, and fund school libraries and literacy instruction, shall Santa Cruz City Elementary School District continue its expiring parcel tax for nine years at an annual rate of $105/parcel, exempting parcels owned/occupied by senior citizens (65+)? An independent oversight committee will audit spending, with every dollar staying in this community to support local elementary schools and no funds used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7275, "fingerprint": "2008|200800212|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800212|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "dccc6a240f377727", "measure_id": "200800212", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe and modern school facilities, improve student learning, and qualify for matching funds, shall the Scotts Valley Unified School District issue $55 million in bonds at legal interest rates to replace our 65-year old middle school with modern classrooms and facilities, replace deteriorating portables with permanent classrooms, and add/improve classrooms, libraries, multi-purpose rooms, and other school facilities, with independent citizen oversight, mandatory annual audits, no money for administrator salaries and all funds benefiting Scotts Valley schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3020, "no_votes": 2617, "total_votes": 5637, "percent_yes": 53.5746, "percent_no": 46.4254, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.322545", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.349184", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe and modern school facilities, improve student learning, and qualify for matching funds, shall the Scotts Valley Unified School District issue $55 million in bonds at legal interest rates to replace our 65-year old middle school with modern classrooms and facilities, replace deteriorating portables with permanent classrooms, and add/improve classrooms, libraries, multi-purpose rooms, and other school facilities, with independent citizen oversight, mandatory annual audits, no money for administrator salaries and all funds benefiting Scotts Valley schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7273, "fingerprint": "2008|200800129|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800129|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "08e0c81d49ef4356", "measure_id": "200800129", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To support and maintain local public libraries and library services through acquiring books, children's educational materials, computers and technology; increase and improve children's reading, adult literacy, senior and other educational programs; and upgrade local library facilities, shall Ordinance No. 1 of the Santa Cruz County Public Library Authority be amended to continue the exisiting 1/4 cent sales tax for libraries with no increase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39105, "no_votes": 14424, "total_votes": 53529, "percent_yes": 73.05386, "percent_no": 26.94614, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.321933", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.348614", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support and maintain local public libraries and library services through acquiring books, children's educational materials, computers and technology; increase and improve children's reading, adult literacy, senior and other educational programs; and upgrade local library facilities, shall Ordinance No. 1 of the Santa Cruz County Public Library Authority be amended to continue the exisiting 1/4 cent sales tax for libraries with no increase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7276, "fingerprint": "2008|200800221|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800221|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "3d2a7311414cc94b", "measure_id": "200800221", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to limit further reductions in the City's General Fund and in order to recoup funds lost as a result of the repeal of the City's emergency response (911) fee, shall the City impose a tax on City telephone service subscribers in the amount of $3.49 per land and cellular line per month? The tax would reduce further budget cuts and enable the City Council to allocate additional funding to public safety including 911 Emergency Communication Center services.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4944, "no_votes": 4745, "total_votes": 9689, "percent_yes": 51.02694, "percent_no": 48.97306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-08-26", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.322885", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.349463", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to limit further reductions in the City's General Fund and in order to recoup funds lost as a result of the repeal of the City's emergency response (911) fee, shall the City impose a tax on City telephone service subscribers in the amount of $3.49 per land and cellular line per month? The tax would reduce further budget cuts and enable the City Council to allocate additional funding to public safety including 911 Emergency Communication Center services.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7274, "fingerprint": "2008|200800211|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800211|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "c564e113fb2bea5a", "measure_id": "200800211", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood schools and provide for student safety, health, and learning; to replace relocatable classrooms; to acquire, construct, upgrade and equip classrooms, restrooms, facilities and sites; and to retire an outstanding facilities loan, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $18,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates for Aromas-San Juan Bautista school projects, not administrator's salaries or operating expenses, with citizens' oversight and independent public financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7, "no_votes": 7, "total_votes": 14, "percent_yes": 50.0, "percent_no": 50.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.322225", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.348901", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood schools and provide for student safety, health, and learning; to replace relocatable classrooms; to acquire, construct, upgrade and equip classrooms, restrooms, facilities and sites; and to retire an outstanding facilities loan, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $18,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates for Aromas-San Juan Bautista school projects, not administrator's salaries or operating expenses, with citizens' oversight and independent public financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7282, "fingerprint": "2008|200800093|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800093|SHASTA", "content_hash": "fffc3060c7b27b46", "measure_id": "200800093", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate existing schools, upgrade heating, ventilation and cooling systems, update electrical systems to improve student access to computers and modern technology, replace old portable classrooms with new permanent classrooms, and meet handicap accessibility requirements, shall Enterprise Elementary School District issue $34,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, to acquire, construct, repair and equip schools, sites, and facilities, with no money for administrators? salaries, and spending annually reviewed by an independent oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4340, "no_votes": 3234, "total_votes": 7574, "percent_yes": 57.301295, "percent_no": 42.698705, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.324798", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.351123", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate existing schools, upgrade heating, ventilation and cooling systems, update electrical systems to improve student access to computers and modern technology, replace old portable classrooms with new permanent classrooms, and meet handicap accessibility requirements, shall Enterprise Elementary School District issue $34,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, to acquire, construct, repair and equip schools, sites, and facilities, with no money for administrators? salaries, and spending annually reviewed by an independent oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7287, "fingerprint": "2008|200800566|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800566|SHASTA", "content_hash": "7229096eb6beaccd", "measure_id": "200800566", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, construct, upgrade, renovate and equip outdated classrooms and facilities at Prairie and Pacheco Schools including replacing deteriorating portable classrooms, repairing and replacing roofs; upgrading technology systems to improve student access to computers, renovating restrooms, libraries, and computer labs, and making health and safety improvements, shall Pacheco Union School District issue $11,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2534, "no_votes": 2014, "total_votes": 4548, "percent_yes": 55.7168, "percent_no": 44.2832, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.326430", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.352567", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, construct, upgrade, renovate and equip outdated classrooms and facilities at Prairie and Pacheco Schools including replacing deteriorating portable classrooms, repairing and replacing roofs; upgrading technology systems to improve student access to computers, renovating restrooms, libraries, and computer labs, and making health and safety improvements, shall Pacheco Union School District issue $11,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7283, "fingerprint": "2008|200800562|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800562|SHASTA", "content_hash": "6cfd78f008e69413", "measure_id": "200800562", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, repair and replace old plumbing, sewer systems, and roofs; upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to computers and modern technology; renovate and upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities including libraries and computer labs; and make health and safety improvements; shall Cascade Union Elementary School District issue $12.4 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, and  no money for teacher or administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3211, "no_votes": 1589, "total_votes": 4800, "percent_yes": 66.89583, "percent_no": 33.104169999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.325161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.351398", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, repair and replace old plumbing, sewer systems, and roofs; upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to computers and modern technology; renovate and upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities including libraries and computer labs; and make health and safety improvements; shall Cascade Union Elementary School District issue $12.4 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, and  no money for teacher or administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7284, "fingerprint": "2008|200800563|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800563|SHASTA", "content_hash": "6a63e6e150f90270", "measure_id": "200800563", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Columbia School District be authorized to replace and construct school facilities including classrooms, restrooms, and libraries; improve access to computers and technology; make health and safety improvements; upgrade heating, air conditioning, electrical, and plumbing systems; and make the District eligible for $5.0 million in State matching grants by issuing $9.5 million in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2518, "no_votes": 2137, "total_votes": 4655, "percent_yes": 54.09237, "percent_no": 45.90763, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.325490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.351703", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Columbia School District be authorized to replace and construct school facilities including classrooms, restrooms, and libraries; improve access to computers and technology; make health and safety improvements; upgrade heating, air conditioning, electrical, and plumbing systems; and make the District eligible for $5.0 million in State matching grants by issuing $9.5 million in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7286, "fingerprint": "2008|200800565|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800565|SHASTA", "content_hash": "fd2925e0d711db30", "measure_id": "200800565", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, construct new classrooms to replace outdated, temporary portable classrooms; build new restrooms; make health and safety improvements; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and construct a local gymnasium for school and community use; shall the Happy Valley Union Elementary School District issue $3,800,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring annual financial audits, no money for administrative salaries, and an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1743, "no_votes": 1044, "total_votes": 2787, "percent_yes": 62.540364, "percent_no": 37.459636, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.326136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.352275", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, construct new classrooms to replace outdated, temporary portable classrooms; build new restrooms; make health and safety improvements; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and construct a local gymnasium for school and community use; shall the Happy Valley Union Elementary School District issue $3,800,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring annual financial audits, no money for administrative salaries, and an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7285, "fingerprint": "2008|200800564|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800564|SHASTA", "content_hash": "e0ef0feaab8ca7bf", "measure_id": "200800564", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and construct classrooms and school facilities including libraries and cafeterias; upgrade outdated heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; make health and safety improvements; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and improve handicapped accessibility; shall the Gateway Unified School District issue $19,000,000 of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates, with no money for teacher or administrative salaries, with spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7152, "no_votes": 5244, "total_votes": 12396, "percent_yes": 57.69603, "percent_no": 42.30397, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.325812", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.351987", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and construct classrooms and school facilities including libraries and cafeterias; upgrade outdated heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; make health and safety improvements; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and improve handicapped accessibility; shall the Gateway Unified School District issue $19,000,000 of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates, with no money for teacher or administrative salaries, with spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7291, "fingerprint": "2008|200800273|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800273|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "a5bdcdbbdf343ca8", "measure_id": "200800273", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall there be an increase of two percent (2%) to the general tax for the privilege of transient occupancy in any hotel as defined in Title 8, Chapter 4 of the Siskiyou County Code, which increase would set the total transient occupancy tax at ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5455, "no_votes": 6599, "total_votes": 12054, "percent_yes": 45.254686, "percent_no": 54.745314, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.327795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.353709", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be an increase of two percent (2%) to the general tax for the privilege of transient occupancy in any hotel as defined in Title 8, Chapter 4 of the Siskiyou County Code, which increase would set the total transient occupancy tax at ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7290, "fingerprint": "2008|200800272|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800272|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "b45507a57167ab0f", "measure_id": "200800272", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the county levy a special tax in the Scott Valley Fire and Emergency response zone to be used only for fire and emergency response purposes not to exceed forty dollars ($40.00) each year for each improved parcel, with lesser amounts for unimproved parcels and additional parcels beyond the first parcel, subject to cost of living adjustment not to exceed four percent (4%) in any year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28, "no_votes": 37, "total_votes": 65, "percent_yes": 43.076923, "percent_no": 56.923077, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.327488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.353428", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the county levy a special tax in the Scott Valley Fire and Emergency response zone to be used only for fire and emergency response purposes not to exceed forty dollars ($40.00) each year for each improved parcel, with lesser amounts for unimproved parcels and additional parcels beyond the first parcel, subject to cost of living adjustment not to exceed four percent (4%) in any year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7292, "fingerprint": "2008|200800567|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800567|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "3daf32476a001e27", "measure_id": "200800567", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, reconstruct, repair, replace, acquire, construct and make improvements to school buildings and facilities, and meet fire, health, and safety standards to improve health, safety and education for students, shall the Siskiyou Union High Elementary School District issue a maximum of $12,500,000 in bonds, with interest rates within legal limits, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries or other routine school operating expenses with all money raised benefiting local students?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4418, "no_votes": 3241, "total_votes": 7659, "percent_yes": 57.68377, "percent_no": 42.31623, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.328114", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.353981", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, reconstruct, repair, replace, acquire, construct and make improvements to school buildings and facilities, and meet fire, health, and safety standards to improve health, safety and education for students, shall the Siskiyou Union High Elementary School District issue a maximum of $12,500,000 in bonds, with interest rates within legal limits, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries or other routine school operating expenses with all money raised benefiting local students?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7288, "fingerprint": "2008|200800270|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800270|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "815fac38f6ac56c5", "measure_id": "200800270", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Lake Shastina Community Services District increase its special tax for police protection services to $97.00 per parcel per year? Said tax is to be used to obtain, furnish, operate and maintain police assets and police and public safety related services for the protection of life and property in the Lake Shastina Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 652, "no_votes": 398, "total_votes": 1050, "percent_yes": 62.095237, "percent_no": 37.904763, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.326834", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.352858", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lake Shastina Community Services District increase its special tax for police protection services to $97.00 per parcel per year? Said tax is to be used to obtain, furnish, operate and maintain police assets and police and public safety related services for the protection of life and property in the Lake Shastina Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7289, "fingerprint": "2008|200800271|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800271|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "ef53d77ed9894c4f", "measure_id": "200800271", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a new special parcel tax to replace the existing special tax enacted by the voters on June 3, 1997 commencing in fiscal year 2009-2010 to provide fire protection, emergency response and ambulance services at the rates and for the land use categories specified in resolution 05, 2008?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 435, "no_votes": 132, "total_votes": 567, "percent_yes": 76.719576, "percent_no": 23.280423999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.327175", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.353150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a new special parcel tax to replace the existing special tax enacted by the voters on June 3, 1997 commencing in fiscal year 2009-2010 to provide fire protection, emergency response and ambulance services at the rates and for the land use categories specified in resolution 05, 2008?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7295, "fingerprint": "2008|200800569|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800569|SOLANO", "content_hash": "65d81f7823728140", "measure_id": "200800569", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $475 million in bonds at the lowest available interest rates to improve student academic performance by building classrooms, facilities and labs throughout the district including for teaching green technologies; nursing and healthcare programs; architecture; engineering and construction management; computer sciences; early childhood development; and fire and police public safety programs at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom and Sacramento City College Campuses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 26, "percent_yes": 65.384614, "percent_no": 34.615386, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.329082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.354817", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $475 million in bonds at the lowest available interest rates to improve student academic performance by building classrooms, facilities and labs throughout the district including for teaching green technologies; nursing and healthcare programs; architecture; engineering and construction management; computer sciences; early childhood development; and fire and police public safety programs at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom and Sacramento City College Campuses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7293, "fingerprint": "2008|200800274|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800274|SOLANO", "content_hash": "a0b42b15932ff596", "measure_id": "200800274", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2008-01 to amend the 1994 Orderly Growth initiative to reflect agriculture and open space policies, land use designations, and the Land Use Diagram in the 2008 Solano County General Plan and to extend the amended initiative until December 31, 2028 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97747, "no_votes": 40223, "total_votes": 137970, "percent_yes": 70.846564, "percent_no": 29.153436, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.328425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.354268", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2008-01 to amend the 1994 Orderly Growth initiative to reflect agriculture and open space policies, land use designations, and the Land Use Diagram in the 2008 Solano County General Plan and to extend the amended initiative until December 31, 2028 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7294, "fingerprint": "2008|200800568|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800568|SOLANO", "content_hash": "e5dc250fa70a0347", "measure_id": "200800568", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Davis Joint Unified School District preserve existing classroom programs including math and science, English, music, physical education, librarians, secondary class size reduction, athletics and co-curricular programs including drama, debate, and journalism by being authorized to levy a special tax for a period of three years not to exceed the annual rate of $50.00 per dwelling unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $120.00 per parcel for all other parcels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19, "no_votes": 7, "total_votes": 26, "percent_yes": 73.07692, "percent_no": 26.92308, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.328767", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.354545", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Davis Joint Unified School District preserve existing classroom programs including math and science, English, music, physical education, librarians, secondary class size reduction, athletics and co-curricular programs including drama, debate, and journalism by being authorized to levy a special tax for a period of three years not to exceed the annual rate of $50.00 per dwelling unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $120.00 per parcel for all other parcels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7296, "fingerprint": "2008|200800094|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800094|SONOMA", "content_hash": "53f41dfa16b9a9c3", "measure_id": "200800094", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Geyserville Unified School District repair, upgrade, replace and acquire safety, communication, electrical and heating/air conditioning systems, restrooms, plumbing, roofing, dry rot, and other school facilities, furniture and equipment needs; and help qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $3,250,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with accountability provided by citizens' oversight and independent audits, and with no funds used for administrators' or teachers' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 498, "no_votes": 224, "total_votes": 722, "percent_yes": 68.97507, "percent_no": 31.024929999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.329393", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.355089", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Geyserville Unified School District repair, upgrade, replace and acquire safety, communication, electrical and heating/air conditioning systems, restrooms, plumbing, roofing, dry rot, and other school facilities, furniture and equipment needs; and help qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $3,250,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with accountability provided by citizens' oversight and independent audits, and with no funds used for administrators' or teachers' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7298, "fingerprint": "2008|200800096|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800096|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4be94fc4e9d023ce", "measure_id": "200800096", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build new classrooms to relieve severe overcrowding, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, build science labs, upgrade classroom computers and technology and to secure state matching funds, shall the Windsor Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, and acquire, construct, furnish and equip school facilities and issue $50,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrator salaries and appoint an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6208, "no_votes": 3683, "total_votes": 9891, "percent_yes": 62.764126, "percent_no": 37.235874, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.330024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.355637", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build new classrooms to relieve severe overcrowding, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms, build science labs, upgrade classroom computers and technology and to secure state matching funds, shall the Windsor Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, and acquire, construct, furnish and equip school facilities and issue $50,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrator salaries and appoint an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7299, "fingerprint": "2008|200800113|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800113|SONOMA", "content_hash": "95375d6092de9928", "measure_id": "200800113", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue funding of science instructors, music teachers, library services, school counselors, computer and technology assistance, and to enhance quality educational programs for students, shall Liberty School District renew its current parcel tax for nine years at $57.00 per year beginning July 1, 2008, with a 2.5% annual adjustment in successive years, with an exemption available for individuals aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 388, "no_votes": 123, "total_votes": 511, "percent_yes": 75.92955, "percent_no": 24.070449999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.330382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.355909", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding of science instructors, music teachers, library services, school counselors, computer and technology assistance, and to enhance quality educational programs for students, shall Liberty School District renew its current parcel tax for nine years at $57.00 per year beginning July 1, 2008, with a 2.5% annual adjustment in successive years, with an exemption available for individuals aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7300, "fingerprint": "2008|200800114|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800114|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4548d956b429a2c7", "measure_id": "200800114", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To keep school libraries open, maintain computer and technology programs, reading programs, smaller class sizes, music and arts programs, child counseling services, and provide for necessary educational programs and materials, to the extent such funds are available, shall the Wilmar Union School District be authorized to renew an annual parcel tax of $50 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2008, with citizens oversight committee, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 669, "no_votes": 202, "total_votes": 871, "percent_yes": 76.80827000000001, "percent_no": 23.191729999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.330976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.356178", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep school libraries open, maintain computer and technology programs, reading programs, smaller class sizes, music and arts programs, child counseling services, and provide for necessary educational programs and materials, to the extent such funds are available, shall the Wilmar Union School District be authorized to renew an annual parcel tax of $50 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2008, with citizens oversight committee, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7302, "fingerprint": "2008|200800214|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800214|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a6800cc8a582550e", "measure_id": "200800214", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To benefit all of the students living in the communities served by Healdsburg High School by maintaining small class sizes, updating technology and providing for necessary educational programs and materials, shall the Healdsburg Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $88 per taxable parcel for seven years only, beginning July 1, 2008, with annual audits and offering an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3016, "no_votes": 1799, "total_votes": 4815, "percent_yes": 62.63759, "percent_no": 37.36241, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.331644", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.356751", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To benefit all of the students living in the communities served by Healdsburg High School by maintaining small class sizes, updating technology and providing for necessary educational programs and materials, shall the Healdsburg Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $88 per taxable parcel for seven years only, beginning July 1, 2008, with annual audits and offering an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7301, "fingerprint": "2008|200800213|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800213|SONOMA", "content_hash": "bbf9c684f1163d0d", "measure_id": "200800213", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to provide our students with courses in the arts and music, as well as technology instruction, all essential for student growth and development, shall the Gravenstein Union School District be authorized to levy a qualified special tax of $45 per year on each parcel of taxable real property in the District for no more than eight years, commencing July 1, 2009, after the expiration of the existing parcel tax, with annual audits and an exemption for seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1223, "no_votes": 697, "total_votes": 1920, "percent_yes": 63.697916, "percent_no": 36.302084, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.331296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.356460", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to provide our students with courses in the arts and music, as well as technology instruction, all essential for student growth and development, shall the Gravenstein Union School District be authorized to levy a qualified special tax of $45 per year on each parcel of taxable real property in the District for no more than eight years, commencing July 1, 2009, after the expiration of the existing parcel tax, with annual audits and an exemption for seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7306, "fingerprint": "2008|200800570|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800570|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ba9bc1e7510d02bb", "measure_id": "200800570", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build new classrooms to avoid overcrowding, replace old heating, plumbing and electrical systems with energy efficient systems, build a multipurpose room at Taylor Mountain Elementary and repair or replace aging roofs, shall the Bellevue Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $19,000,000, in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrators' salaries and an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3953, "no_votes": 1802, "total_votes": 5755, "percent_yes": 68.688095, "percent_no": 31.311904999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.336024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.358174", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build new classrooms to avoid overcrowding, replace old heating, plumbing and electrical systems with energy efficient systems, build a multipurpose room at Taylor Mountain Elementary and repair or replace aging roofs, shall the Bellevue Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $19,000,000, in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrators' salaries and an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7303, "fingerprint": "2008|200800438|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800438|SONOMA", "content_hash": "1984c06322a39788", "measure_id": "200800438", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce City of Petaluma wastewater and water service rates to rates in effect on January 1, 2006 and provide for specified annual adjustments thereto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11954, "no_votes": 14351, "total_votes": 26305, "percent_yes": 45.443833, "percent_no": 54.556167, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.331952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.357031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce City of Petaluma wastewater and water service rates to rates in effect on January 1, 2006 and provide for specified annual adjustments thereto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11632, "fingerprint": "2008|200800439|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800439|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a7f2ed9013cfee65", "measure_id": "200800439", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to reduce City of Rohnert Park's current sewer service rates to rates in effect on January 1, 2006, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8424, "no_votes": 7533, "total_votes": 15957, "percent_yes": 52.791876, "percent_no": 47.208124, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.373049", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.332376", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.357312", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to reduce City of Rohnert Park's current sewer service rates to rates in effect on January 1, 2006, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7297, "fingerprint": "2008|200800095|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800095|SONOMA", "content_hash": "576c9e3f2e19e954", "measure_id": "200800095", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide affordable, local higher education and career training in nursing, health care, information technology and public safety, fix deteriorating roofs, increase solar energy use to reduce costs, improve disabled access, upgrade wiring for technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, sites, facilities, shall Napa Valley Community College District issue $178,400,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens' oversight committee, and require annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 157, "no_votes": 102, "total_votes": 259, "percent_yes": 60.61776, "percent_no": 39.38224, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.329716", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.355363", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide affordable, local higher education and career training in nursing, health care, information technology and public safety, fix deteriorating roofs, increase solar energy use to reduce costs, improve disabled access, upgrade wiring for technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, sites, facilities, shall Napa Valley Community College District issue $178,400,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens' oversight committee, and require annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7304, "fingerprint": "2008|200800440|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800440|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c062e9837ac9e7ba", "measure_id": "200800440", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve Sebastopol's safety and quality of life and maintain essential general fund services such as police, fire, and street maintenance, shall an ordinance be adopted to establish a utility tax to be known as the \"Utility Users Tax\" on gas and electric service only, that cannot exceed four percent and this is limited to six years and providing for the collection of same with certain exemptions and conditions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2473, "no_votes": 1684, "total_votes": 4157, "percent_yes": 59.49002, "percent_no": 40.50998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.335190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.357588", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve Sebastopol's safety and quality of life and maintain essential general fund services such as police, fire, and street maintenance, shall an ordinance be adopted to establish a utility tax to be known as the \"Utility Users Tax\" on gas and electric service only, that cannot exceed four percent and this is limited to six years and providing for the collection of same with certain exemptions and conditions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7305, "fingerprint": "2008|200800441|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800441|SONOMA", "content_hash": "de9dbb20a65e5cb3", "measure_id": "200800441", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the town of Windsor Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax, commonly called the \"hotel tax,\" which is charged only on persons who occupy hotel rooms in the Town for 30 days or less, from 8 percent to 12 percent in order to contribute funding towards basic Town services such as police, street repair, park maintenance, and community programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8035, "no_votes": 3407, "total_votes": 11442, "percent_yes": 70.223737, "percent_no": 29.776263, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.335625", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.357870", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the town of Windsor Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax, commonly called the \"hotel tax,\" which is charged only on persons who occupy hotel rooms in the Town for 30 days or less, from 8 percent to 12 percent in order to contribute funding towards basic Town services such as police, street repair, park maintenance, and community programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7307, "fingerprint": "2008|200800013|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800013|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "43b0eb843f3df68c", "measure_id": "200800013", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Should the 30-Year Land Use Restriction Initiative be approved, which would require majority approval of County-wide voters for each change in County General Plan land use designation from \"agriculture\" to \"residential\" in Stanislaus County, except within the nine cities of the County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63121, "no_votes": 30838, "total_votes": 93959, "percent_yes": 67.179304, "percent_no": 32.820696, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.336335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.358445", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Should the 30-Year Land Use Restriction Initiative be approved, which would require majority approval of County-wide voters for each change in County General Plan land use designation from \"agriculture\" to \"residential\" in Stanislaus County, except within the nine cities of the County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7308, "fingerprint": "2008|200800014|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800014|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "7fbae1f948247925", "measure_id": "200800014", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Should the Stanislaus County Responsible Planning and Growth Control Initiative be approved, which would initiate a comprehensive update of the County General Plan; and would limit residential development until a new General Plan is approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59247, "no_votes": 34784, "total_votes": 94031, "percent_yes": 63.007945, "percent_no": 36.992055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.336658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.358745", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Should the Stanislaus County Responsible Planning and Growth Control Initiative be approved, which would initiate a comprehensive update of the County General Plan; and would limit residential development until a new General Plan is approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7309, "fingerprint": "2008|200800048|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800048|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "50b210a9c1cd3dd3", "measure_id": "200800048", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to: upgrade mayor's duties/responsibilities; increase accountability of city departments by requiring city council to implement budget/policy priorities; establish an independent City Auditor; create a citizens' commission to recommend council salaries, impose  mandatory salary caps on city council; require annual performance audits for key personnel; modernize accountability/disciplinary practices; and make deputy directors and attorneys \"at will\" employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31946, "no_votes": 8861, "total_votes": 40807, "percent_yes": 78.285587, "percent_no": 21.714412999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.336964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.359020", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to: upgrade mayor's duties/responsibilities; increase accountability of city departments by requiring city council to implement budget/policy priorities; establish an independent City Auditor; create a citizens' commission to recommend council salaries, impose  mandatory salary caps on city council; require annual performance audits for key personnel; modernize accountability/disciplinary practices; and make deputy directors and attorneys \"at will\" employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7310, "fingerprint": "2008|200800049|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800049|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a2e341384ed1bc7a", "measure_id": "200800049", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should Modesto change its system of electing City Councilmembers to a \"By District\" system as follows:  Six Districts where candidates must live in the District they wish to represent and the voters who live in the District vote on who will represent that District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29037, "no_votes": 11613, "total_votes": 40650, "percent_yes": 71.43173, "percent_no": 28.56827, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.337272", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.359297", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Modesto change its system of electing City Councilmembers to a \"By District\" system as follows:  Six Districts where candidates must live in the District they wish to represent and the voters who live in the District vote on who will represent that District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7311, "fingerprint": "2008|200800130|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800130|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "368157a4d1644499", "measure_id": "200800130", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Keyes Community Services District's service charge for street lighting be increased from $10 to $20 a year for three years and then to $25 a year for each parcel of land within the District, effective January 1, 2008?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 172, "no_votes": 139, "total_votes": 311, "percent_yes": 55.30547, "percent_no": 44.69453, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.337607", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.359577", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Keyes Community Services District's service charge for street lighting be increased from $10 to $20 a year for three years and then to $25 a year for each parcel of land within the District, effective January 1, 2008?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7314, "fingerprint": "2008|200800572|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800572|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "1fac5bd7054b159f", "measure_id": "200800572", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide our local students with the same classrooms and school facilities as other California school districts, major repairs, upgrades, and classroom construction are necessary to ensure these buildings will remain functional for future generations. Shall Newman Crows Landing Unified School District issue $25,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1998, "no_votes": 1116, "total_votes": 3114, "percent_yes": 64.16185, "percent_no": 35.83815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.338511", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.360409", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide our local students with the same classrooms and school facilities as other California school districts, major repairs, upgrades, and classroom construction are necessary to ensure these buildings will remain functional for future generations. Shall Newman Crows Landing Unified School District issue $25,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7312, "fingerprint": "2008|200800275|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800275|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "520f5cba73362fd1", "measure_id": "200800275", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a one-half cent sales tax be approved for 20 years, requiring ongoing citizen oversight, and securing state/federal matching funds for countywide road improvements, including: Improving safety/reducing congestion on local highways; Improving intersections and synchronizing traffic signals; Improving emergency response times for police/fire; Enhancing student safety around schools; Improving travel along east-west corridors; Retrofitting/replacing bridges; and Filling potholes, fixing, widening and extending local roads?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 103306, "no_votes": 52229, "total_votes": 155535, "percent_yes": 66.419774, "percent_no": 33.580225999999996, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.337944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.359854", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a one-half cent sales tax be approved for 20 years, requiring ongoing citizen oversight, and securing state/federal matching funds for countywide road improvements, including: Improving safety/reducing congestion on local highways; Improving intersections and synchronizing traffic signals; Improving emergency response times for police/fire; Enhancing student safety around schools; Improving travel along east-west corridors; Retrofitting/replacing bridges; and Filling potholes, fixing, widening and extending local roads?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7316, "fingerprint": "2008|200800574|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800574|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "5507bdce1adc4c33", "measure_id": "200800574", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace deteriorating bathrooms/leaky roofs, upgrade heating, ventilation, cooling and electrical systems, remove asbestos, improve drinking water, relieve overcrowding, upgrade technology, fire alarms, communications and safety systems, shall Stanislaus Union Elementary School District issue $39,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, to acquire, construct, repair and equip classrooms, sites, buildings, centralized kitchen and joint-use facilitites, qualify for State matching funds, with no money for administrators' salaries, independent oversight committee with all funds staying locally to improve schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7213, "no_votes": 3001, "total_votes": 10214, "percent_yes": 70.61876000000001, "percent_no": 29.38123999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.339217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.360958", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace deteriorating bathrooms/leaky roofs, upgrade heating, ventilation, cooling and electrical systems, remove asbestos, improve drinking water, relieve overcrowding, upgrade technology, fire alarms, communications and safety systems, shall Stanislaus Union Elementary School District issue $39,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, to acquire, construct, repair and equip classrooms, sites, buildings, centralized kitchen and joint-use facilitites, qualify for State matching funds, with no money for administrators' salaries, independent oversight committee with all funds staying locally to improve schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7313, "fingerprint": "2008|200800571|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800571|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "87e6fd6e3c2f4d7e", "measure_id": "200800571", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To recruit excellent teachers, instill discipline, keep kids from gangs, qualify for state matching grants by: repairing/expanding vocational education classrooms; upgrading security cameras, fencing, door locks; improving technology/labs/energy efficiency; repairing aging bathrooms; improving safety at drop-off zones; and acquiring real property/building schools/classrooms; shall Ceres Unified School District issue $60 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits and NO money for admistrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9625, "no_votes": 3633, "total_votes": 13258, "percent_yes": 72.597677, "percent_no": 27.402322999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.338213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.360134", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To recruit excellent teachers, instill discipline, keep kids from gangs, qualify for state matching grants by: repairing/expanding vocational education classrooms; upgrading security cameras, fencing, door locks; improving technology/labs/energy efficiency; repairing aging bathrooms; improving safety at drop-off zones; and acquiring real property/building schools/classrooms; shall Ceres Unified School District issue $60 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits and NO money for admistrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7315, "fingerprint": "2008|200800573|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800573|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "0453bff446fe939c", "measure_id": "200800573", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide a quality education for Patterson students and prepare them for college or their career by: Upgrading and repairing classrooms that are more than forty years old, adding new technology, adding science and career training classrooms giving students workforce skills, relieving overcrowded schools; Shall Patterson Joint Unified School District issue $50,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3963, "no_votes": 2008, "total_votes": 5971, "percent_yes": 66.37079, "percent_no": 33.62921, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.338903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.360684", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a quality education for Patterson students and prepare them for college or their career by: Upgrading and repairing classrooms that are more than forty years old, adding new technology, adding science and career training classrooms giving students workforce skills, relieving overcrowded schools; Shall Patterson Joint Unified School District issue $50,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7317, "fingerprint": "2008|200800131|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800131|SUTTER", "content_hash": "ad662a071e21aaa0", "measure_id": "200800131", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance, which provides that a charter commission be elected to propose a charter, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4868, "no_votes": 8631, "total_votes": 13499, "percent_yes": 36.06193, "percent_no": 63.93807, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.339532", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.361239", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance, which provides that a charter commission be elected to propose a charter, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7318, "fingerprint": "2008|200800163|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800163|SUTTER", "content_hash": "4c933739ddbbf685", "measure_id": "200800163", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended to allow adjustments in the Board of Supervisors' compensation if specifically recommended by the Grand Jury?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3397, "no_votes": 4604, "total_votes": 8001, "percent_yes": 42.457193, "percent_no": 57.542807, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.339839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.361515", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended to allow adjustments in the Board of Supervisors' compensation if specifically recommended by the Grand Jury?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7319, "fingerprint": "2008|200800215|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800215|SUTTER", "content_hash": "cfe76c43ff20e7f4", "measure_id": "200800215", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the members of the Tehama County Board of Supervisors be elected by District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1194, "no_votes": 616, "total_votes": 1810, "percent_yes": 65.96685, "percent_no": 34.033150000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.340132", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.361790", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the members of the Tehama County Board of Supervisors be elected by District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7320, "fingerprint": "2008|200800575|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800575|SUTTER", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "200800575", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1711, "no_votes": 1023, "total_votes": 2734, "percent_yes": 62.58229600000001, "percent_no": 37.41770399999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.340426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.362085", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1201, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1179|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1179|Statewide", "content_hash": "fc0446ed0058edaa", "measure_id": "CA1179", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Veterans' Bond Act of 2008", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.59999847, "percent_no": 36.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1200, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1178|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1178|Statewide", "content_hash": "3cfadb54e7c989a0", "measure_id": "CA1178", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Standards for Confining Farm Animals. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.5, "percent_no": 36.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established minimum space requirements for confining farm animal...", "summary_text": "This measure established minimum space requirements for confining farm animals, specifically requiring that calves raised for veal, egg-laying hens, and pregnant pigs have enough room to lie down, stand up, fully extend their limbs, and turn around freely. The standards took effect in 2015 and also prohibited the sale of eggs, veal, or pork from animals confined in ways that don't meet these requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1199, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1177|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1177|Statewide", "content_hash": "dceb56ec825ff3ee", "measure_id": "CA1177", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 99", "description": "Eminent Domain. Acquisition of Owner-Occupied Residence. Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.0, "percent_no": 38.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment restricts the government's use of eminent domai...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment restricts the government's use of eminent domain to acquire owner-occupied residences, requiring that such property only be taken for specified public uses rather than for economic development purposes. The measure strengthens protections for homeowners against government seizure of their primary residences.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 99", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_99_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2099%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2099%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1198, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1176|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1176|Statewide", "content_hash": "b7a3265987cdff11", "measure_id": "CA1176", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 95", "description": "Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment to Indian Gaming Compact.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.59999847, "percent_no": 44.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries | State-Tribal Relations\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure was a referendum to overturn amendments to tribal gaming ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure was a referendum to overturn amendments to tribal gaming compacts that had been negotiated between California and four Indian tribes. The measure sought to reverse expanded casino gaming agreements that allowed for additional slot machines and casino operations.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 95", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_95_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2095%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2095%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1197, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1175|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1175|Statewide", "content_hash": "642fcfe2e5528b42", "measure_id": "CA1175", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 94", "description": "Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment to Indian Gaming Compact.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.59999847, "percent_no": 44.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries | State-Tribal Relations\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure was a referendum to overturn the California Legislature's...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure was a referendum to overturn the California Legislature's approval of amendments to tribal gaming compacts that would have allowed four specific tribes to operate additional slot machines at their casinos. The measure's passage meant that the compact amendments were rejected and the tribes could not expand their gaming operations as originally approved.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 94", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_94_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2094%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2094%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1196, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1174|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1174|Statewide", "content_hash": "f45e144892fb02e9", "measure_id": "CA1174", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 97", "description": "Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment to Indian Gaming Compact.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.5, "percent_no": 44.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure was a referendum to overturn amendments to California's I...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure was a referendum to overturn amendments to California's Indian gaming compact that had been previously approved by the legislature and governor. The measure passed, meaning voters chose to reject the compact amendments.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 97", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_97_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2097%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2097%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1195, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1173|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1173|Statewide", "content_hash": "53848928d8d3699a", "measure_id": "CA1173", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 96", "description": "Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment to Indian Gaming Compact.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.5, "percent_no": 44.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries | State-Tribal Relations\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure was a referendum to overturn amendments to the Indian Gam...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure was a referendum to overturn amendments to the Indian Gaming Compact that would have allowed the Pechanga Band of Luise\u00f1o Indians to expand their casino operations. The measure's passage meant the compact amendments were rejected, preventing the proposed casino expansion.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 96", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_96_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2096%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2096%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1194, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1172|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1172|Statewide", "content_hash": "0ca493148ac74618", "measure_id": "CA1172", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Children\u2019s Hospital Bond Act. Grant Program. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.29999924, "percent_no": 44.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to sell $980 million in general obligation ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to sell $980 million in general obligation bonds to fund grants for construction, expansion, renovation, and equipment at qualifying children's hospitals in California. The bonds would be repaid by taxpayers over approximately 30 years with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1193, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1171|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1171|Statewide", "content_hash": "af15eebe83469cf9", "measure_id": "CA1171", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Criminal Justice System. Victims\u2019 Rights. Parole. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.90000153, "percent_no": 46.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established additional rights for crime victims in the criminal ...", "summary_text": "This measure established additional rights for crime victims in the criminal justice process, including the right to be notified of and participate in court proceedings, and modified parole procedures to require more consideration of public safety and victims' input. It amended the California Constitution and state statutes to expand victims' participation in plea bargaining, sentencing, and parole decisions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1192, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1170|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1170|Statewide", "content_hash": "d510dab8c5cbdc0c", "measure_id": "CA1170", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1A", "description": "Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.70000076, "percent_no": 47.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized $9", "summary_text": "This measure authorized $9.95 billion in general obligation bonds to fund the construction of a high-speed rail system connecting major California cities, with the system designed to travel at speeds exceeding 200 mph. The bonds would finance the initial segment of a statewide rail network intended to reduce traffic congestion and provide an alternative to air travel between metropolitan areas.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1A", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1A_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201A%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201A%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1191, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1169|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1169|Statewide", "content_hash": "0ef8cbd13777c3d3", "measure_id": "CA1169", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Eliminates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.29999924, "percent_no": 47.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure amended the California Constitution to eliminate the righ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure amended the California Constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry, overturning a state Supreme Court decision that had legalized same-sex marriage earlier in 2008. The measure passed with 52.3% of the vote, defining marriage as only between a man and a woman in the state constitution.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1190, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1168|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1168|Statewide", "content_hash": "c9b8128c030d0f74", "measure_id": "CA1168", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Redistricting. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.90000153, "percent_no": 49.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure transferred the authority to draw California's congressional dis...", "summary_text": "This measure transferred the authority to draw California's congressional district boundaries from the state legislature to the Citizens Redistricting Commission, which was already responsible for drawing state legislative districts. The amendment aimed to reduce partisan gerrymandering by having an independent commission handle congressional redistricting following each U.S. Census.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1189, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1167|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1167|Statewide", "content_hash": "4f408fe59ece6d9c", "measure_id": "CA1167", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor\u2019s Pregnancy. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.0, "percent_no": 52.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Abortion\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to require a 48-h...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to require a 48-hour waiting period and parental notification before a minor could obtain an abortion, with exceptions for medical emergencies and judicial bypass options. The measure failed with 48% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1188, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1166|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1166|Statewide", "content_hash": "e076114719d3aa3c", "measure_id": "CA1166", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 93", "description": "Limits on Legislators\u2019 Terms in Office. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.40000153, "percent_no": 53.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures | Term Limits\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established term limits for California state legislat...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established term limits for California state legislators, restricting the number of terms they could serve in office. The initiative sought to amend the state constitution to impose these legislative term limits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 93", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_93_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2093%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2093%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1187, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1165|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1165|Statewide", "content_hash": "e847c4f71d23a829", "measure_id": "CA1165", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 92", "description": "Community Colleges. Funding. Governance. Fees. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.70000076, "percent_no": 57.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established dedicated state funding for California co...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established dedicated state funding for California community colleges, created a new governance structure with an elected board of governors, and prohibited the legislature from raising student fees above $15 per unit without voter approval. It also would have required the state to maintain community college funding at specified minimum levels based on enrollment and cost-of-living adjustments.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 92", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_92_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2092%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2092%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1186, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1164|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1164|Statewide", "content_hash": "0039fe239a931fae", "measure_id": "CA1164", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 91", "description": "Transportation Funding. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.59999847, "percent_no": 58.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited the state from using gasoline tax and vehi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited the state from using gasoline tax and vehicle registration fee revenues for purposes other than transportation, and would have restricted the legislature's ability to change transportation funding allocations without voter approval. It would have constitutionally dedicated these revenues to highways, roads, and other transportation infrastructure projects.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 91", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_91_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2091%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2091%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1185, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1163|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1163|Statewide", "content_hash": "e491408652779d31", "measure_id": "CA1163", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Nonviolent Drug Offenses. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.5, "percent_no": 59.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have required drug treatment instead of incarceration f...", "summary_text": "This initiative would have required drug treatment instead of incarceration for certain nonviolent drug possession offenses and would have shortened parole periods for nonviolent drug offenders. It also would have allocated state funds for drug treatment programs and allowed certain offenders to have their records expunged after completing treatment.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1184, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1162|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1162|Statewide", "content_hash": "2931f3cc46198bef", "measure_id": "CA1162", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Renewable Energy. Bonds. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.5, "percent_no": 59.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Energy & Electric Utilities | Environmental Protection | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have authorized $5 billion in general obligation bo...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have authorized $5 billion in general obligation bonds to fund rebates and incentives for purchases of alternative fuel vehicles and renewable energy systems by individuals, businesses, cities, and other government entities. The measure also would have provided funding for research, development, and production of alternative fuel and renewable energy technology in California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1183, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1161|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1161|Statewide", "content_hash": "82b005114713d76c", "measure_id": "CA1161", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 98", "description": "Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property. Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.5, "percent_no": 61.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment would have restricted the government's ability ...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment would have restricted the government's ability to acquire private property through eminent domain and would have imposed additional regulations on government actions that affect private property values. The measure aimed to limit when and how government entities could take or regulate private property for public use.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 98", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_98_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2098%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2098%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1182, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1160|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1160|Statewide", "content_hash": "063d76e7b19552f8", "measure_id": "CA1160", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Renewable Energy Generation. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.5, "percent_no": 64.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Environmental Protection\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required California utilities to generate 50% of thei...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required California utilities to generate 50% of their electricity from renewable energy sources by 2025, increasing from the existing 20% requirement by 2010. The initiative would have established penalties for non-compliance and created a state fund to provide loans for renewable energy projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1181, "fingerprint": "2008|CA1159|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|CA1159|Statewide", "content_hash": "954e2b08a6e50d5f", "measure_id": "CA1159", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Police and Law Enforcement Funding. Criminal Penalties and Laws. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.89999962, "percent_no": 69.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased funding for local police and law enforcemen...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased funding for local police and law enforcement through various means and enhanced criminal penalties for certain offenses. It would have modified existing criminal laws and created new penalties as part of an effort to strengthen law enforcement capabilities in California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(2008)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2008/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2008", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%202008", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%202008", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 7321, "fingerprint": "2008|200800276|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800276|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "6f2682387cf9f624", "measure_id": "200800276", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Abolish the current trustee areas in the Live Oak Unified School District and create at large elections for trustees.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14587, "no_votes": 7763, "total_votes": 22350, "percent_yes": 65.26622, "percent_no": 34.733779999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.340722", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.362361", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Abolish the current trustee areas in the Live Oak Unified School District and create at large elections for trustees.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7322, "fingerprint": "2008|200800277|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800277|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "b30955aa12a9edfa", "measure_id": "200800277", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To renovate and repair our local high school, add new classrooms, and improve school facilities including cafeteria/gymnasium and an agriculture education center, make needed school safety improvements, acquire and construct school facilities and qualify the District to receive $5,601,316 in State grants shall Sutter Union High School District be authorized to issue $12,600,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12319, "no_votes": 9828, "total_votes": 22147, "percent_yes": 55.62378999999999, "percent_no": 44.37621000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.341036", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.362654", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and repair our local high school, add new classrooms, and improve school facilities including cafeteria/gymnasium and an agriculture education center, make needed school safety improvements, acquire and construct school facilities and qualify the District to receive $5,601,316 in State grants shall Sutter Union High School District be authorized to issue $12,600,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7323, "fingerprint": "2008|200800576|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800576|TRINITY", "content_hash": "4077c290b47ed78c", "measure_id": "200800576", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting thereon, the Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified School District shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $5,950,000 in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed below in the Bond Project List, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified herein.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117, "no_votes": 89, "total_votes": 206, "percent_yes": 56.796116, "percent_no": 43.203884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.341346", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.362937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "By approval of this proposition by at least 55% of the registered voters voting thereon, the Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified School District shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $5,950,000 in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed below in the Bond Project List, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified herein.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7325, "fingerprint": "2008|200800098|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800098|TULARE", "content_hash": "6568926fc7d475bf", "measure_id": "200800098", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce overcrowding, and leverage approximately $29,000,000 in State funds to complete a new high school and elementary school, shall the Lindsay Unified School District be authorized to acquire, improve or build a new high school library, gymnasium, athletic and vocational education facilities, and an elementary cafeteria/multipurpose room by issuing up to $20,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1285, "no_votes": 540, "total_votes": 1825, "percent_yes": 70.41096, "percent_no": 29.589039999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.342054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.363528", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce overcrowding, and leverage approximately $29,000,000 in State funds to complete a new high school and elementary school, shall the Lindsay Unified School District be authorized to acquire, improve or build a new high school library, gymnasium, athletic and vocational education facilities, and an elementary cafeteria/multipurpose room by issuing up to $20,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7327, "fingerprint": "2008|200800100|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800100|TULARE", "content_hash": "08fac0be46d0f1e9", "measure_id": "200800100", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the overall quality of student education, shall Woodlake Union High School District be authorized to acquire, construct and improve school and athletic facilities, make health and safety improvements and potentially qualify the District to receive $3,000,000 in grants and State matching funds by issuing $4,500,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with a citizens? oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1592, "no_votes": 984, "total_votes": 2576, "percent_yes": 61.80124, "percent_no": 38.19876, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.342667", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.364095", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the overall quality of student education, shall Woodlake Union High School District be authorized to acquire, construct and improve school and athletic facilities, make health and safety improvements and potentially qualify the District to receive $3,000,000 in grants and State matching funds by issuing $4,500,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with a citizens? oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7324, "fingerprint": "2008|200800097|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800097|TULARE", "content_hash": "6b62e9b73c4170fa", "measure_id": "200800097", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct, repair and upgrade Wilson Middle School to meet current standards, and accommodate student enrollment shall Exeter Union Elementary School District construct classrooms, restrooms, a gymnasium, administrative offices,  repair, construct and upgrade other school facilities as necessary by issuing $6,400,000 of bonds within legal interest rates with annual audits, an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee with all funds spent locally and no bond money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2066, "no_votes": 965, "total_votes": 3031, "percent_yes": 68.16232, "percent_no": 31.837680000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.341732", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.363218", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, repair and upgrade Wilson Middle School to meet current standards, and accommodate student enrollment shall Exeter Union Elementary School District construct classrooms, restrooms, a gymnasium, administrative offices,  repair, construct and upgrade other school facilities as necessary by issuing $6,400,000 of bonds within legal interest rates with annual audits, an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee with all funds spent locally and no bond money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7326, "fingerprint": "2008|200800099|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800099|TULARE", "content_hash": "ba338f7ad168f5aa", "measure_id": "200800099", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire,  construct and improve school facilities, including  a multipurpose building comparable to support facilities in neighboring school districts, with cafeteria and kitchen facilities, girls and boys restrooms, an enclosed area for student sports and assemblies, and space for community sponsored activities and events, and qualify for $2,000,000 in State grants, shall Tipton Elementary School District issue $3,100,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens? oversight committee, and no money for teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 174, "no_votes": 168, "total_votes": 342, "percent_yes": 50.877196000000005, "percent_no": 49.122803999999995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.342373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.363828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire,  construct and improve school facilities, including  a multipurpose building comparable to support facilities in neighboring school districts, with cafeteria and kitchen facilities, girls and boys restrooms, an enclosed area for student sports and assemblies, and space for community sponsored activities and events, and qualify for $2,000,000 in State grants, shall Tipton Elementary School District issue $3,100,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens? oversight committee, and no money for teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7330, "fingerprint": "2008|200800216|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800216|TULARE", "content_hash": "c54a49ad7961e4f0", "measure_id": "200800216", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, modernize, and improve our local school, including improved fencing to enhance student safety and security, upgrading restrooms to improve handicapped access, improving access to modern technology, and repairing roofs, shall the Stone Corral Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $715,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46, "no_votes": 25, "total_votes": 71, "percent_yes": 64.788735, "percent_no": 35.211265, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.343530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.364993", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, modernize, and improve our local school, including improved fencing to enhance student safety and security, upgrading restrooms to improve handicapped access, improving access to modern technology, and repairing roofs, shall the Stone Corral Elementary School District be authorized to issue up to $715,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7328, "fingerprint": "2008|200800164|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800164|TULARE", "content_hash": "b8e35ab531ff8926", "measure_id": "200800164", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to maintain and improve city services in public safety including but not limited to police and fire protection, code enforcement and other general services, related to the quality of life and public safety of the citizens of Lindsay, shall the sales tax be increased by three-quarters of a cent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 163, "no_votes": 394, "total_votes": 557, "percent_yes": 29.263914000000003, "percent_no": 70.736086, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.342961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.364386", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain and improve city services in public safety including but not limited to police and fire protection, code enforcement and other general services, related to the quality of life and public safety of the citizens of Lindsay, shall the sales tax be increased by three-quarters of a cent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7329, "fingerprint": "2008|200800165|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800165|TULARE", "content_hash": "0e8e98e25d9e9c72", "measure_id": "200800165", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1.1 be added to the Freeholders Charter of the City of Porterville, designating the phrase \u201cIn God We Trust\u201d as the official motto of the City of Porterville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3210, "no_votes": 643, "total_votes": 3853, "percent_yes": 83.311707, "percent_no": 16.688293, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.343228", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.364701", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1.1 be added to the Freeholders Charter of the City of Porterville, designating the phrase \u201cIn God We Trust\u201d as the official motto of the City of Porterville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7331, "fingerprint": "2008|200800577|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800577|TULARE", "content_hash": "be520ebea8072f5e", "measure_id": "200800577", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare students for high demand jobs, qualify for $47 million in State building grants, construct a nursing education and training center, upgrade nursing instruction equipment, heating and ventilation, classroom/computer technology, labs, and safety systems, repair aging roofs, electrical, plumbing, upgrade/construct/equip/acquire classrooms, facilities, sites, shall College of the Sequoias Visalia Area Improvement District No. 2 of the College of the Sequoias Community College District issue $28 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and all funds staying in the Visalia area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35713, "no_votes": 18357, "total_votes": 54070, "percent_yes": 66.049564, "percent_no": 33.950435999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.343840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.365293", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare students for high demand jobs, qualify for $47 million in State building grants, construct a nursing education and training center, upgrade nursing instruction equipment, heating and ventilation, classroom/computer technology, labs, and safety systems, repair aging roofs, electrical, plumbing, upgrade/construct/equip/acquire classrooms, facilities, sites, shall College of the Sequoias Visalia Area Improvement District No. 2 of the College of the Sequoias Community College District issue $28 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and all funds staying in the Visalia area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7332, "fingerprint": "2008|200800578|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800578|TULARE", "content_hash": "8a19bb8f30ce1f34", "measure_id": "200800578", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a permanent Tulare College Center, including buildings for welding/ farming equipment repair classes/ vocational education, qualify for $98 million in State building grants, construct classrooms, library, computer labs, an agricultural education complex, livestock pavilion, including farm animal buildings and labs, upgrade/construct/equip/acquire classrooms, facilities/ sites; shall College of the Sequoias Tulare Area Improvement District No. 3 of the College of the Sequoias Community College District issue $60 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and all funds staying in the Tulare area for college facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14661, "no_votes": 5346, "total_votes": 20007, "percent_yes": 73.27935, "percent_no": 26.720650000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.344161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.365590", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a permanent Tulare College Center, including buildings for welding/ farming equipment repair classes/ vocational education, qualify for $98 million in State building grants, construct classrooms, library, computer labs, an agricultural education complex, livestock pavilion, including farm animal buildings and labs, upgrade/construct/equip/acquire classrooms, facilities/ sites; shall College of the Sequoias Tulare Area Improvement District No. 3 of the College of the Sequoias Community College District issue $60 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and all funds staying in the Tulare area for college facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7333, "fingerprint": "2008|200800579|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800579|TULARE", "content_hash": "124177edda603599", "measure_id": "200800579", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "\u201cTo improve the quality of education, construct, modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; replace 20 year old heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and construct a local gymnasium for school and community use; shall the Terra Bella Union Elementary School District issue $3,300,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no money for administrative salaries?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 763, "no_votes": 370, "total_votes": 1133, "percent_yes": 67.343336, "percent_no": 32.656664000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.344474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.365872", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "\u201cTo improve the quality of education, construct, modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; replace 20 year old heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and construct a local gymnasium for school and community use; shall the Terra Bella Union Elementary School District issue $3,300,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no money for administrative salaries?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7334, "fingerprint": "2008|200800132|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800132|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "8befa5c42104c509", "measure_id": "200800132", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the charges on parcels and businesses, for the purpose of operating an ambulance service in the South County Ambulance Zone of County Service Area No. 21, as proposed by Resolution No. 25-08 of the Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1208, "no_votes": 322, "total_votes": 1530, "percent_yes": 78.95425, "percent_no": 21.045749999999998, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.344775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.366166", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the charges on parcels and businesses, for the purpose of operating an ambulance service in the South County Ambulance Zone of County Service Area No. 21, as proposed by Resolution No. 25-08 of the Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7337, "fingerprint": "2008|200800217|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800217|VENTURA", "content_hash": "be6318c73963fcc8", "measure_id": "200800217", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase safety, health, welfare and educational effectiveness of the Mesa School site for students, shall the Mesa Union School District be authorized to construct and install school facilities and supporting infrastructure, including the equipping of school facilities, or acquire real property for school facilities by issuing not to exceed $4,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 506, "no_votes": 321, "total_votes": 827, "percent_yes": 61.18501, "percent_no": 38.81499, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.345660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.367005", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase safety, health, welfare and educational effectiveness of the Mesa School site for students, shall the Mesa Union School District be authorized to construct and install school facilities and supporting infrastructure, including the equipping of school facilities, or acquire real property for school facilities by issuing not to exceed $4,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7336, "fingerprint": "2008|200800167|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800167|VENTURA", "content_hash": "685491c987c6044e", "measure_id": "200800167", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending City of Thousand Oaks General Plan and adding a Zoning provision: (1) requiring certain large projects to undergo a comprehensive traffic study using two different methodologies; and (2) requiring the project be submitted for voter approval at a citywide election, if the study concludes that the project's trip generation results in a Level Service of \"D\" or worse to impacted City roads or intersections before any traffic mitigation be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11753, "no_votes": 15124, "total_votes": 26877, "percent_yes": 43.728837, "percent_no": 56.271163, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.345389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.366726", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending City of Thousand Oaks General Plan and adding a Zoning provision: (1) requiring certain large projects to undergo a comprehensive traffic study using two different methodologies; and (2) requiring the project be submitted for voter approval at a citywide election, if the study concludes that the project's trip generation results in a Level Service of \"D\" or worse to impacted City roads or intersections before any traffic mitigation be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7338, "fingerprint": "2008|200800218|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800218|VENTURA", "content_hash": "11ff4b0dd9ac6e95", "measure_id": "200800218", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect neighborhood schools' academic excellence, enhance student success, reduce state budget cut impacts, help retain qualified teachers, limit class size increases, provide up-to-date instructional materials, and preserve academic programs, shall Oak Park Unified School District renew -- without increasing -- its existing $197 annual parcel tax for 8 years, with exemptions for homes owned/occupied by seniors, annual public audits, independent citizens' oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2764, "no_votes": 573, "total_votes": 3337, "percent_yes": 82.828885, "percent_no": 17.171115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.345989", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.367276", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect neighborhood schools' academic excellence, enhance student success, reduce state budget cut impacts, help retain qualified teachers, limit class size increases, provide up-to-date instructional materials, and preserve academic programs, shall Oak Park Unified School District renew -- without increasing -- its existing $197 annual parcel tax for 8 years, with exemptions for homes owned/occupied by seniors, annual public audits, independent citizens' oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7335, "fingerprint": "2008|200800166|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800166|VENTURA", "content_hash": "2904aa667ef52f08", "measure_id": "200800166", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance entitled the \"East Area One Project Approval Initiative\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3292, "no_votes": 695, "total_votes": 3987, "percent_yes": 82.56835, "percent_no": 17.431650000000005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.345044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.366444", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance entitled the \"East Area One Project Approval Initiative\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7340, "fingerprint": "2008|200800442|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800442|VENTURA", "content_hash": "ca555dcdfc7671bf", "measure_id": "200800442", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolutions Nos. 08-3111: 'Approving TTR 5679, Subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program?' and 08-3112: 'Approving DP 06-03, Subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting Program' be repealed in their entirety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2366, "no_votes": 1566, "total_votes": 3932, "percent_yes": 60.17294, "percent_no": 39.82706, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.346555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.367828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolutions Nos. 08-3111: 'Approving TTR 5679, Subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program?' and 08-3112: 'Approving DP 06-03, Subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting Program' be repealed in their entirety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7341, "fingerprint": "2008|200800443|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800443|VENTURA", "content_hash": "6e919c3769006853", "measure_id": "200800443", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fillmore's General Plan be amended to create a North Fillmore Specific Plan area with a density of 1-5 units per acre with a maximium of 350 dwelling units permitted for the entire 101 acres, including a 10-acre park, where existing industrial uses within the area would be allowed to continue, expand or be modified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2372, "no_votes": 1796, "total_votes": 4168, "percent_yes": 56.90979, "percent_no": 43.09021, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.346821", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.368104", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fillmore's General Plan be amended to create a North Fillmore Specific Plan area with a density of 1-5 units per acre with a maximium of 350 dwelling units permitted for the entire 101 acres, including a 10-acre park, where existing industrial uses within the area would be allowed to continue, expand or be modified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7342, "fingerprint": "2008|200800444|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800444|VENTURA", "content_hash": "b0d7735cf96ba86c", "measure_id": "200800444", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect, maintain, and enhance vital services including police, fire, emergency response, increasing street paving/pothole repair to improve traffic flow, expanding youth recreation, after school and anti-gang prevention programs, acquiring property for parks/open space preservation, upgrading stormwater drains, improving senior services, increasing code compliance, and other general services- shall the sales tax be increased by one half cent for twenty years only, with citizen oversight and independent financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29162, "no_votes": 15636, "total_votes": 44798, "percent_yes": 65.09666, "percent_no": 34.90334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.347086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.368377", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect, maintain, and enhance vital services including police, fire, emergency response, increasing street paving/pothole repair to improve traffic flow, expanding youth recreation, after school and anti-gang prevention programs, acquiring property for parks/open space preservation, upgrading stormwater drains, improving senior services, increasing code compliance, and other general services- shall the sales tax be increased by one half cent for twenty years only, with citizen oversight and independent financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7348, "fingerprint": "2008|200800583|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800583|VENTURA", "content_hash": "b16ef29180ba2f91", "measure_id": "200800583", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain small class sizes, retain highly qualified teachers and staff, continue to offer fine arts programs (such as music, dance, and drama), maintain athletic programs, avoid closure of schools and libraries, and continue to improve student proficiency in core cirriculum, shall Ojai Unified School District levy a tax of $89 per parcel annually for seven years with annual audits, 65 years and older exemptions, and independent citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7140, "no_votes": 3687, "total_votes": 10827, "percent_yes": 65.946245, "percent_no": 34.053754999999995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.350330", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.369604", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain small class sizes, retain highly qualified teachers and staff, continue to offer fine arts programs (such as music, dance, and drama), maintain athletic programs, avoid closure of schools and libraries, and continue to improve student proficiency in core cirriculum, shall Ojai Unified School District levy a tax of $89 per parcel annually for seven years with annual audits, 65 years and older exemptions, and independent citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7349, "fingerprint": "2008|200800584|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800584|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e68a660ad39dbc05", "measure_id": "200800584", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education; build new school facilities including a science and technology building, classrooms and a cafeteria; upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize existing classrooms, restrooms and facilities; and make health, safety, and handicap accessibility improvements; shall the Santa Paula Union High School District issue $30.9 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5871, "no_votes": 2469, "total_votes": 8340, "percent_yes": 70.395684, "percent_no": 29.604315999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.350787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.369793", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education; build new school facilities including a science and technology building, classrooms and a cafeteria; upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to computers and modern technology; modernize existing classrooms, restrooms and facilities; and make health, safety, and handicap accessibility improvements; shall the Santa Paula Union High School District issue $30.9 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7347, "fingerprint": "2008|200800582|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800582|VENTURA", "content_hash": "925bb4e06e7f391c", "measure_id": "200800582", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support quality education in Oak Park schools by repairing, renovating and improving aging facilities; repairing water damage and failing roofs; removing hazardous materials; making schools earthquake safe; replacing outdated fire and security systems; and improving classrooms to modern safety and instructional standards; shall Oak Park Unified School District issue $29,445,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizens' oversight of all expenditures, and no bond funds for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3966, "no_votes": 2991, "total_votes": 6957, "percent_yes": 57.00733, "percent_no": 42.99267, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.349743", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.369408", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support quality education in Oak Park schools by repairing, renovating and improving aging facilities; repairing water damage and failing roofs; removing hazardous materials; making schools earthquake safe; replacing outdated fire and security systems; and improving classrooms to modern safety and instructional standards; shall Oak Park Unified School District issue $29,445,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with mandatory annual audits and independent citizens' oversight of all expenditures, and no bond funds for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7346, "fingerprint": "2008|200800581|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800581|VENTURA", "content_hash": "985b305cf3519243", "measure_id": "200800581", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade electrical systems and computer labs to improve student access to modern technology, make health and safety improvements, repair and replace roofs; renovate and modernize outdated classrooms and school buildings at Moorpark High including the library, science labs, and restrooms; shall Moorpark Unified School District issue $39,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with spending reviewed by an independent oversight committee and no money for teacher/administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9560, "no_votes": 5060, "total_votes": 14620, "percent_yes": 65.38988, "percent_no": 34.610119999999995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.349180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.369219", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade electrical systems and computer labs to improve student access to modern technology, make health and safety improvements, repair and replace roofs; renovate and modernize outdated classrooms and school buildings at Moorpark High including the library, science labs, and restrooms; shall Moorpark Unified School District issue $39,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with spending reviewed by an independent oversight committee and no money for teacher/administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7339, "fingerprint": "2008|200800278|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800278|VENTURA", "content_hash": "81ec0c0b8454ea7d", "measure_id": "200800278", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors be adopted prohibiting any person from serving more than three consecutive four-year terms as a member of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 227106, "no_votes": 67493, "total_votes": 294599, "percent_yes": 77.089876, "percent_no": 22.910123999999996, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.346256", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.367553", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors be adopted prohibiting any person from serving more than three consecutive four-year terms as a member of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7345, "fingerprint": "2008|200800580|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800580|VENTURA", "content_hash": "800ed2745d3f9102", "measure_id": "200800580", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Camarillo Unified School District be formed from the territory of the Pleasant Valley School District and the Somis Union School District and a portion of the Oxnard Union High School District, with the Somis Union School District to remain a separate elementary school district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44543, "no_votes": 46469, "total_votes": 91012, "percent_yes": 48.941898, "percent_no": 51.058102, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.348725", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.369029", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Camarillo Unified School District be formed from the territory of the Pleasant Valley School District and the Somis Union School District and a portion of the Oxnard Union High School District, with the Somis Union School District to remain a separate elementary school district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7343, "fingerprint": "2008|200800445|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800445|VENTURA", "content_hash": "c3e0a289a3503f92", "measure_id": "200800445", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall portions of the Oxnard 2020 General Plan be amended to prohibit residential development of five units or larger, or commercial, retail or industrial development in the excess of 10,000 square feet, unless every traffic intersection within a five mile radius of the project operates at a minimum level of service C, subject to certain exemptions, limitations and exceptions as stated in the initiative, including approval of the project by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17236, "no_votes": 27294, "total_votes": 44530, "percent_yes": 38.70649, "percent_no": 61.29351, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.347405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.368625", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall portions of the Oxnard 2020 General Plan be amended to prohibit residential development of five units or larger, or commercial, retail or industrial development in the excess of 10,000 square feet, unless every traffic intersection within a five mile radius of the project operates at a minimum level of service C, subject to certain exemptions, limitations and exceptions as stated in the initiative, including approval of the project by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7344, "fingerprint": "2008|200800446|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800446|VENTURA", "content_hash": "7b8435004cabe8a7", "measure_id": "200800446", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATVE) Shall an ordinance (Ordinance No. 685) entitled \"An initiative to fund general municipal services in Port Hueneme, including, without limitation, police protection and investigations, reduction of gang activities and drug related crimes; rapid response to emergencies; graffiti removal; services for senior citizens; and maintenance and repair of city streets, by enacting a one-half cent transactions and use tax (sales tax) with all money staying local\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4063, "no_votes": 1607, "total_votes": 5670, "percent_yes": 71.65785, "percent_no": 28.342150000000004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.348175", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.368824", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATVE) Shall an ordinance (Ordinance No. 685) entitled \"An initiative to fund general municipal services in Port Hueneme, including, without limitation, police protection and investigations, reduction of gang activities and drug related crimes; rapid response to emergencies; graffiti removal; services for senior citizens; and maintenance and repair of city streets, by enacting a one-half cent transactions and use tax (sales tax) with all money staying local\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7354, "fingerprint": "2008|200800586|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800586|YOLO", "content_hash": "65d81f7823728140", "measure_id": "200800586", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $475 million in bonds at the lowest available interest rates to improve student academic performance by building classrooms, facilities and labs throughout the district including for teaching green technologies; nursing and healthcare programs; architecture; engineering and construction management; computer sciences; early childhood development; and fire and police public safety programs at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom and Sacramento City College Campuses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29107, "no_votes": 17509, "total_votes": 46616, "percent_yes": 62.439936, "percent_no": 37.560064, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.353234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.370747", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $475 million in bonds at the lowest available interest rates to improve student academic performance by building classrooms, facilities and labs throughout the district including for teaching green technologies; nursing and healthcare programs; architecture; engineering and construction management; computer sciences; early childhood development; and fire and police public safety programs at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom and Sacramento City College Campuses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7350, "fingerprint": "2008|200800168|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800168|YOLO", "content_hash": "b1b9071367cf01dd", "measure_id": "200800168", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance The Utility User's Tax Modernization Act, adding Chapter 3.22 to the Winters Municipal Code and reducing the existing Utility User's Tax Rate from 5% to 4.75% be enacted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 559, "no_votes": 252, "total_votes": 811, "percent_yes": 68.92725, "percent_no": 31.07275, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.351399", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.369984", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance The Utility User's Tax Modernization Act, adding Chapter 3.22 to the Winters Municipal Code and reducing the existing Utility User's Tax Rate from 5% to 4.75% be enacted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7351, "fingerprint": "2008|200800447|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800447|YOLO", "content_hash": "272b08cf9096778a", "measure_id": "200800447", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure V is approved, should the proceeds fund the operations of a streetcar system serving West Sacramento and flood protection improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9582, "no_votes": 5193, "total_votes": 14775, "percent_yes": 64.85279, "percent_no": 35.14721, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.351928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.370171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure V is approved, should the proceeds fund the operations of a streetcar system serving West Sacramento and flood protection improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7352, "fingerprint": "2008|200800448|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800448|YOLO", "content_hash": "2dbaa37dff928b64", "measure_id": "200800448", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of West Sacramento continue one-fourth cent of the existing one-half cent sales tax for general government purposes including but not limited to community facilities and programs until March 31, 2033 to replace the one-fourth cent set to expire on March 31, 2013?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8636, "no_votes": 6300, "total_votes": 14936, "percent_yes": 57.820034, "percent_no": 42.179966, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.352364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.370365", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of West Sacramento continue one-fourth cent of the existing one-half cent sales tax for general government purposes including but not limited to community facilities and programs until March 31, 2033 to replace the one-fourth cent set to expire on March 31, 2013?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7353, "fingerprint": "2008|200800585|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800585|YOLO", "content_hash": "e5dc250fa70a0347", "measure_id": "200800585", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Davis Joint Unified School District preserve existing classroom programs including math and science, English, music, physical education, librarians, secondary class size reduction, athletics and co-curricular programs including drama, debate, and journalism by being authorized to levy a special tax for a period of three years not to exceed the annual rate of $50.00 per dwelling unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $120.00 per parcel for all other parcels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25297, "no_votes": 8118, "total_votes": 33415, "percent_yes": 75.70552, "percent_no": 24.294479999999993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.352802", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.370557", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Davis Joint Unified School District preserve existing classroom programs including math and science, English, music, physical education, librarians, secondary class size reduction, athletics and co-curricular programs including drama, debate, and journalism by being authorized to levy a special tax for a period of three years not to exceed the annual rate of $50.00 per dwelling unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $120.00 per parcel for all other parcels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7355, "fingerprint": "2008|200800015|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800015|YUBA", "content_hash": "839f3fdc4309c9bb", "measure_id": "200800015", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the approval of the Yuba Highlands Development Project pursuant to Resolution 2007-95, consisting of approximately 2,600 acres and including Single Family Low Density, Single Family Medium Density, Multi-Family, Core Commercial, Business Park, Public Facility and Open Space, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3033, "no_votes": 10373, "total_votes": 13406, "percent_yes": 22.624198, "percent_no": 77.375802, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-02-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.353748", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.370944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the approval of the Yuba Highlands Development Project pursuant to Resolution 2007-95, consisting of approximately 2,600 acres and including Single Family Low Density, Single Family Medium Density, Multi-Family, Core Commercial, Business Park, Public Facility and Open Space, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7356, "fingerprint": "2008|200800449|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800449|YUBA", "content_hash": "7f3eb51b8aee53cf", "measure_id": "200800449", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1321, which would authorize the City of Marysville to impose and collect a one-half cent sales tax (transaction and use tax) for general government purposes be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1252, "no_votes": 2149, "total_votes": 3401, "percent_yes": 36.812702, "percent_no": 63.187298, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.354186", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.371136", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1321, which would authorize the City of Marysville to impose and collect a one-half cent sales tax (transaction and use tax) for general government purposes be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7357, "fingerprint": "2008|200800587|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800587|YUBA", "content_hash": "f1ecbb786a0f0b64", "measure_id": "200800587", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue improving the quality of education in local schools and protecting the safety of our children, by repairing, replacing or updating fire alarm systems, worn-out roofs, outdated classrooms and science labs, plumbing and heating/air conditioning systems; and to help qualify for State matching funds for school modernization and construction, shall the Marysville Joint Unified School District issue $47,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9931, "no_votes": 5973, "total_votes": 15904, "percent_yes": 62.44341, "percent_no": 37.55659, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.354635", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.371325", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue improving the quality of education in local schools and protecting the safety of our children, by repairing, replacing or updating fire alarm systems, worn-out roofs, outdated classrooms and science labs, plumbing and heating/air conditioning systems; and to help qualify for State matching funds for school modernization and construction, shall the Marysville Joint Unified School District issue $47,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7358, "fingerprint": "2008|200800588|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800588|YUBA", "content_hash": "687c5dbd6c6d55fd", "measure_id": "200800588", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to enhance student learning and avoid future overcrowding, by acquiring property, designing schools, and constructing new school facilities to provide adequate classroom space at all grade levels; with bonds issued at the lowest possible interest rates, with no money spent on salaries or administration; shall the Plumas Elementary School District issue $20 million of bonds, with spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 858, "no_votes": 731, "total_votes": 1589, "percent_yes": 53.996223, "percent_no": 46.003777, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.355085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.371520", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to enhance student learning and avoid future overcrowding, by acquiring property, designing schools, and constructing new school facilities to provide adequate classroom space at all grade levels; with bonds issued at the lowest possible interest rates, with no money spent on salaries or administration; shall the Plumas Elementary School District issue $20 million of bonds, with spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7359, "fingerprint": "2008|200800589|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2008|200800589|YUBA", "content_hash": "57e49252b8e4dd66", "measure_id": "200800589", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2008, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Wheatland School District, upgrade and improve elementary school facilities, which include providing energy efficient windows, making health and safety improvements, modernizing classrooms, improving and constructing playfields and athletic facilities, and constructing and/or renovating a library and pool for school and community use; shall Wheatland School District issue $5,700,000 of bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring a citizens' oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1465, "no_votes": 778, "total_votes": 2243, "percent_yes": 65.31430999999999, "percent_no": 34.68569000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2008-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.355551", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.371718", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Wheatland School District, upgrade and improve elementary school facilities, which include providing energy efficient windows, making health and safety improvements, modernizing classrooms, improving and constructing playfields and athletic facilities, and constructing and/or renovating a library and pool for school and community use; shall Wheatland School District issue $5,700,000 of bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring a citizens' oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11633, "fingerprint": "2007|200700088|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700088|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d7a7db24e2b1b9ff", "measure_id": "200700088", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain high quality of life in Emeryville and fund essential services including police, fire, 9-1-1, park maintenance, litter abatement, graffiti removal, flood protection, street maintenance, accessibility improvements, child care, senior and recreation programs, shall an ordinance be adopted that continues and ratifies the existing Utility Users Tax, requires voter approval for rate increases, modernizes telecommunications service definitions so taxpayers are treated the same regardless of technology used, with all expenditures subject to annual audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1234, "no_votes": 202, "total_votes": 1436, "percent_yes": 85.93314763231199, "percent_no": 14.066852367688014, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.386508", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.357022", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.372106", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high quality of life in Emeryville and fund essential services including police, fire, 9-1-1, park maintenance, litter abatement, graffiti removal, flood protection, street maintenance, accessibility improvements, child care, senior and recreation programs, shall an ordinance be adopted that continues and ratifies the existing Utility Users Tax, requires voter approval for rate increases, modernizes telecommunications service definitions so taxpayers are treated the same regardless of technology used, with all expenditures subject to annual audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7360, "fingerprint": "2007|200700060|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700060|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "264e18e45d845a1d", "measure_id": "200700060", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue the improvement of student achievement in Emeryville schools by continuing local funding for reading, math, and science instruction; keeping class sizes small; retaining qualified and experienced teachers and school employees; maintaining classroom technology; and supporting educational programs, shall Emery Unified School District extend its expiring parcel tax at 15 cents per square foot of improved property for ten years with an exemption for seniors, an independent citizen's oversight committee and all funds staying local?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 747, "no_votes": 113, "total_votes": 860, "percent_yes": 86.86046511627907, "percent_no": 13.139534883720927, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.356254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.371915", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue the improvement of student achievement in Emeryville schools by continuing local funding for reading, math, and science instruction; keeping class sizes small; retaining qualified and experienced teachers and school employees; maintaining classroom technology; and supporting educational programs, shall Emery Unified School District extend its expiring parcel tax at 15 cents per square foot of improved property for ten years with an exemption for seniors, an independent citizen's oversight committee and all funds staying local?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7361, "fingerprint": "2007|200700001|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700001|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "f477533a5222a7df", "measure_id": "200700001", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 06-330 of the Calaveras County Board of Supervisors, authorizing imposition of an annual special tax in the amount of $1,815.94 per parcel of real property in the Bar XX County Service Area No. 2 for a period of ten years to repay a loan in the amount of $1.2 million funding road improvements be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49, "no_votes": 34, "total_votes": 83, "percent_yes": 59.036144578313255, "percent_no": 40.963855421686745, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.357681", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.372303", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 06-330 of the Calaveras County Board of Supervisors, authorizing imposition of an annual special tax in the amount of $1,815.94 per parcel of real property in the Bar XX County Service Area No. 2 for a period of ten years to repay a loan in the amount of $1.2 million funding road improvements be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7362, "fingerprint": "2007|200700072|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700072|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "d6f5b530d6070fe9", "measure_id": "200700072", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve the safety of Calaveras County residents and stop the early release of inmates by acquiring and constructing a new County Sheriff\u2019s jail, 911 dispatch center, and support facilities, and to help qualify for State matching funds, shall the County of Calaveras issue $31,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7312, "no_votes": 3573, "total_votes": 10885, "percent_yes": 67.17501148369315, "percent_no": 32.824988516306846, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.358395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.372493", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the safety of Calaveras County residents and stop the early release of inmates by acquiring and constructing a new County Sheriff\u2019s jail, 911 dispatch center, and support facilities, and to help qualify for State matching funds, shall the County of Calaveras issue $31,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7363, "fingerprint": "2007|200700040|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700040|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "c6559059b4d33f43", "measure_id": "200700040", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a resolution be adopted which will authorize the Board of Directors to levy a special tax on residential parcels within the Port Costa area for maintenance and operation of the District\u2019s park and recreation facilities and services within the District at not to exceed $50 per parcel per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53, "no_votes": 16, "total_votes": 69, "percent_yes": 76.81159420289855, "percent_no": 23.188405797101453, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.358885", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.372695", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a resolution be adopted which will authorize the Board of Directors to levy a special tax on residential parcels within the Port Costa area for maintenance and operation of the District\u2019s park and recreation facilities and services within the District at not to exceed $50 per parcel per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7364, "fingerprint": "2007|200700054|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700054|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "79b9b73d9ca2025a", "measure_id": "200700054", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a new Community Facilities District 2007-1 (Citywide Landscape Maintenance District) be funded to replace the expiring District for a period of ten years to operate and maintain public roadway landscaping, trails system, open space weed abatement and related costs, with an annual levy of a special tax in the initial amount of $196.77 per residential parcel and per non-residential acre or fraction thereof, and with an initial yearly appropriations limit of $850,550?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2445, "no_votes": 503, "total_votes": 2948, "percent_yes": 82.93758480325644, "percent_no": 17.062415196743558, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.359369", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.372899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a new Community Facilities District 2007-1 (Citywide Landscape Maintenance District) be funded to replace the expiring District for a period of ten years to operate and maintain public roadway landscaping, trails system, open space weed abatement and related costs, with an annual levy of a special tax in the initial amount of $196.77 per residential parcel and per non-residential acre or fraction thereof, and with an initial yearly appropriations limit of $850,550?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7365, "fingerprint": "2007|200700055|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700055|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "829066f373b480f0", "measure_id": "200700055", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to complete Lafayette\u2019s road and drain reconstruction program to expeditiously bring all public streets to a good quality and continue the maintenance program, shall the City be authorized to collect a parcel tax not to exceed $150 per year per equivalent residential unit, for thirty years, with the City\u2019s all-volunteer Capital Projects Assessment Committee to review expenditures semi-annually to ensure they conform with the purposes of the ballot measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3641, "no_votes": 2092, "total_votes": 5733, "percent_yes": 63.50950636664923, "percent_no": 36.49049363335077, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.359839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.373108", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to complete Lafayette\u2019s road and drain reconstruction program to expeditiously bring all public streets to a good quality and continue the maintenance program, shall the City be authorized to collect a parcel tax not to exceed $150 per year per equivalent residential unit, for thirty years, with the City\u2019s all-volunteer Capital Projects Assessment Committee to review expenditures semi-annually to ensure they conform with the purposes of the ballot measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7366, "fingerprint": "2007|200700056|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700056|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e2468bff984ebaad", "measure_id": "200700056", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If the City is authorized to collect a parcel tax for Lafayette road and drain reconstruction and maintenance, should the City continue its current practice of augmenting funds designated for such purposes by appropriating at least $1 million annually from the General Fund for the road and drain maintenance program so that the program remains a high priority?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3980, "no_votes": 1594, "total_votes": 5574, "percent_yes": 71.40294223179046, "percent_no": 28.597057768209538, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.360367", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.373306", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If the City is authorized to collect a parcel tax for Lafayette road and drain reconstruction and maintenance, should the City continue its current practice of augmenting funds designated for such purposes by appropriating at least $1 million annually from the General Fund for the road and drain maintenance program so that the program remains a high priority?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7367, "fingerprint": "2007|200700057|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700057|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "889200cba01111b8", "measure_id": "200700057", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Orinda Roads, Drains and Water Supply Bond Measure. To implement the Orinda Infrastructure Finance Plan which will provide funds to repair damaged roads, collapsing drains, and inadequate water supply, shall the City of Orinda issue fifty eight point six million dollars in bonds, requiring an annual independent audit, requiring monitoring by an independent citizens oversight committee and mandating that bond proceeds will only be spent to improve Orinda streets, storm drains and water supply?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4346, "no_votes": 2491, "total_votes": 6837, "percent_yes": 63.565891472868216, "percent_no": 36.434108527131784, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.360843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.373500", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Orinda Roads, Drains and Water Supply Bond Measure. To implement the Orinda Infrastructure Finance Plan which will provide funds to repair damaged roads, collapsing drains, and inadequate water supply, shall the City of Orinda issue fifty eight point six million dollars in bonds, requiring an annual independent audit, requiring monitoring by an independent citizens oversight committee and mandating that bond proceeds will only be spent to improve Orinda streets, storm drains and water supply?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7369, "fingerprint": "2007|200700066|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700066|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "cfc087f507ca8366", "measure_id": "200700066", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain reduced class sizes, purchase textbooks and teaching materials; enhance core subjects; attract and retain teachers; maintain library services, counselors, after-school programs and custodial services; and fund school safety programs, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District be authorized to levy, for 8 years commencing upon the expiration date of the existing parcel tax, an annual tax of 11\u00a2 per square foot of total building area or $11.00 per vacant parcel, with an exemption for eligible senior citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14520, "no_votes": 12172, "total_votes": 26692, "percent_yes": 54.398321594485246, "percent_no": 45.601678405514754, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-08-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.361837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.373899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain reduced class sizes, purchase textbooks and teaching materials; enhance core subjects; attract and retain teachers; maintain library services, counselors, after-school programs and custodial services; and fund school safety programs, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District be authorized to levy, for 8 years commencing upon the expiration date of the existing parcel tax, an annual tax of 11\u00a2 per square foot of total building area or $11.00 per vacant parcel, with an exemption for eligible senior citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7368, "fingerprint": "2007|200700065|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700065|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8cb4099adc2bb7b5", "measure_id": "200700065", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for the Town of Discovery Bay CSD L&L Zone #8 be increased to $715,000 from $600,000 as previously approved by the voters of Discovery Bay, and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the fiscal years 2004/2005 through 2007/2008 (inclusive) to provide for expenditure of funds that will be available to Discovery Bay for Landscaping Maintenance only during the stated fiscal years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 994, "no_votes": 220, "total_votes": 1214, "percent_yes": 81.87808896210873, "percent_no": 18.121911037891266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-08-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.361279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.373703", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for the Town of Discovery Bay CSD L&L Zone #8 be increased to $715,000 from $600,000 as previously approved by the voters of Discovery Bay, and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the fiscal years 2004/2005 through 2007/2008 (inclusive) to provide for expenditure of funds that will be available to Discovery Bay for Landscaping Maintenance only during the stated fiscal years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7370, "fingerprint": "2007|200700150|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700150|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "31ca4728b9337a60", "measure_id": "200700150", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent deep cuts at our elementary and middle schools; preserve small class sizes; attract and retain qualified and experienced teachers, classroom aides, and counselors; provide up-to-date textbooks, instructional materials and classroom technology; and support educational programs that enhance student health and achievement, shall Lafayette School District extend its expiring school parcel tax for seven years at $313.00 per parcel, with an exemption for seniors, adjustment for inflation, and all funds staying local to benefit Lafayette schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6830, "no_votes": 2509, "total_votes": 9339, "percent_yes": 73.13416854052896, "percent_no": 26.86583145947104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.362286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.374108", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent deep cuts at our elementary and middle schools; preserve small class sizes; attract and retain qualified and experienced teachers, classroom aides, and counselors; provide up-to-date textbooks, instructional materials and classroom technology; and support educational programs that enhance student health and achievement, shall Lafayette School District extend its expiring school parcel tax for seven years at $313.00 per parcel, with an exemption for seniors, adjustment for inflation, and all funds staying local to benefit Lafayette schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7371, "fingerprint": "2007|200700073|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700073|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "e80e46106a4b0cd4", "measure_id": "200700073", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Richard Bartholomew Be Recalled (Removed) as Director, Mortara Circle Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 38, "percent_yes": 84.21052631578947, "percent_no": 15.789473684210535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.362737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.374299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Richard Bartholomew Be Recalled (Removed) as Director, Mortara Circle Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7372, "fingerprint": "2007|200700074|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700074|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ffa6d3c9824bc03b", "measure_id": "200700074", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Daina Cullen Be Recalled (Removed) as Director, Mortara Circle Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32, "no_votes": 7, "total_votes": 39, "percent_yes": 82.05128205128204, "percent_no": 17.948717948717956, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.363329", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.374487", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Daina Cullen Be Recalled (Removed) as Director, Mortara Circle Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7373, "fingerprint": "2007|200700075|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700075|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "502d899d83b31960", "measure_id": "200700075", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Christa Dean Be Recalled (Removed) as Director, Mortara Circle Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30, "no_votes": 8, "total_votes": 38, "percent_yes": 78.94736842105263, "percent_no": 21.05263157894737, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.363861", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.374676", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Christa Dean Be Recalled (Removed) as Director, Mortara Circle Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7374, "fingerprint": "2007|200700089|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700089|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b6ef3e8b9d54413e", "measure_id": "200700089", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Selma Police, Fire, 9-1-1 Response and Anti-Gang/Drug Prevention Measure. To hire additional firefighters/police officers for multiple emergencies; purchase fire engines, police cars, and technology to improve 9-1-1 emergency response; buy firefighter breathing apparatus/protective clothing; fully staff two new fire stations for population growth; increase police patrols to protect schools/parks; build a safe police/fire headquarters; and expand anti-gang/drug prevention services; shall the City of Selma enact a one-half cent sales tax requiring Citizens\u2019 over sight and mandatory annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1529, "no_votes": 241, "total_votes": 1770, "percent_yes": 86.38418079096046, "percent_no": 13.615819209039543, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.364356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.374863", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Selma Police, Fire, 9-1-1 Response and Anti-Gang/Drug Prevention Measure. To hire additional firefighters/police officers for multiple emergencies; purchase fire engines, police cars, and technology to improve 9-1-1 emergency response; buy firefighter breathing apparatus/protective clothing; fully staff two new fire stations for population growth; increase police patrols to protect schools/parks; build a safe police/fire headquarters; and expand anti-gang/drug prevention services; shall the City of Selma enact a one-half cent sales tax requiring Citizens\u2019 over sight and mandatory annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7375, "fingerprint": "2007|200700061|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700061|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "cd4b91ab82c84f31", "measure_id": "200700061", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities for students and provide a modern teaching and learning environment, shall the McCabe Union Elementary School District construct a gymnasium, athletic facilities and supporting educational facilities by issuing $7,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 347, "no_votes": 242, "total_votes": 589, "percent_yes": 58.91341256366724, "percent_no": 41.08658743633276, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.365072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.375068", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities for students and provide a modern teaching and learning environment, shall the McCabe Union Elementary School District construct a gymnasium, athletic facilities and supporting educational facilities by issuing $7,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7376, "fingerprint": "2007|200700090|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700090|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "936b308c266a3758", "measure_id": "200700090", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To expand, develop, preserve and protect the safety and character of the City of Brawley with a priority on funding essential public services such as police, fire, crime prevention and street and park maintenance, as well as other City services, shall the City of Brawley authorize a sales tax increase of one-half of one percent, such tax to sunset ten (10) years from its adoption?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1233, "no_votes": 1396, "total_votes": 2629, "percent_yes": 46.89996196272347, "percent_no": 53.10003803727653, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.365770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.375261", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand, develop, preserve and protect the safety and character of the City of Brawley with a priority on funding essential public services such as police, fire, crime prevention and street and park maintenance, as well as other City services, shall the City of Brawley authorize a sales tax increase of one-half of one percent, such tax to sunset ten (10) years from its adoption?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7377, "fingerprint": "2007|200700091|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700091|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "d7e5ce9961cf5d52", "measure_id": "200700091", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to improve facilities for police, fire, library, recreation, and specified public works projects; to help fund the project to cover the New River; to revitalize downtown Calexico; and to promote economic development, by implementing a 0.25 percent sales tax for 15 years only, with annual audits by an independent Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 737, "no_votes": 960, "total_votes": 1697, "percent_yes": 43.42958161461402, "percent_no": 56.57041838538598, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.366283", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.375453", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to improve facilities for police, fire, library, recreation, and specified public works projects; to help fund the project to cover the New River; to revitalize downtown Calexico; and to promote economic development, by implementing a 0.25 percent sales tax for 15 years only, with annual audits by an independent Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7378, "fingerprint": "2007|200700003|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700003|KERN", "content_hash": "8ee084ec8c517810", "measure_id": "200700003", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special tax of up to $100.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of five fiscal years beginning July 1, 2007?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1225, "no_votes": 578, "total_votes": 1803, "percent_yes": 67.94231835829173, "percent_no": 32.05768164170827, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.366772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.375651", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax of up to $100.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of five fiscal years beginning July 1, 2007?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7379, "fingerprint": "2007|200700049|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700049|KERN", "content_hash": "1a759c422d6b2b78", "measure_id": "200700049", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for local students, shall the Vineland School District be authorized to construct a gym for student and community use, improve security fencing around Vineland and Sunset schools for student safety, and upgrade and modernize heating and air conditioning systems at Vineland school by issuing $4.0 million in bonds within legal interest rates with no monies for salaries or administrative costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 188, "no_votes": 39, "total_votes": 227, "percent_yes": 82.81938325991189, "percent_no": 17.180616740088112, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-22", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.367294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.375839", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for local students, shall the Vineland School District be authorized to construct a gym for student and community use, improve security fencing around Vineland and Sunset schools for student safety, and upgrade and modernize heating and air conditioning systems at Vineland school by issuing $4.0 million in bonds within legal interest rates with no monies for salaries or administrative costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7380, "fingerprint": "2007|200700062|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700062|KERN", "content_hash": "909ae428604df464", "measure_id": "200700062", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable Richland School District to upgrade and renovate schools including heating, cooling, plumbing, and electrical systems; construct a new school to reduce overcrowding; provide sports and music facilities at Richland Junior High; make safety improvements; update technology infrastructure; and qualify for up to $14,000,000 in matching grants; shall the District be authorized to issue $19,800,000 of bonds to acquire or improve real property, within legal interest rates and with no money for teacher or administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 643, "no_votes": 329, "total_votes": 972, "percent_yes": 66.1522633744856, "percent_no": 33.8477366255144, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.367789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.376031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable Richland School District to upgrade and renovate schools including heating, cooling, plumbing, and electrical systems; construct a new school to reduce overcrowding; provide sports and music facilities at Richland Junior High; make safety improvements; update technology infrastructure; and qualify for up to $14,000,000 in matching grants; shall the District be authorized to issue $19,800,000 of bonds to acquire or improve real property, within legal interest rates and with no money for teacher or administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7381, "fingerprint": "2007|200700067|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700067|KERN", "content_hash": "c39500ae03d0aeec", "measure_id": "200700067", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide the children in California City with schools comparable to other communities, complete the construction of California City High School and Hacienda Elementary School, upgrade the technology infrastructure to improve student access to modern technology and to construct, acquire and improve school facilities, shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue $24,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits and a taxpayers' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1093, "no_votes": 611, "total_votes": 1704, "percent_yes": 64.14319248826291, "percent_no": 35.85680751173709, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-09-18", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.368129", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.376224", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the children in California City with schools comparable to other communities, complete the construction of California City High School and Hacienda Elementary School, upgrade the technology infrastructure to improve student access to modern technology and to construct, acquire and improve school facilities, shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue $24,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits and a taxpayers' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7384, "fingerprint": "2007|200700152|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700152|KERN", "content_hash": "71d9ba54dc7c02ff", "measure_id": "200700152", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate classrooms and school facilities including upgrading and replacing plumbing, electrical, heating and air conditioning systems, build new classrooms and facilities to relieve overcrowding, repair roofs, modernize the auditorium, make health and safety improvements, improve student access to computers and modern technology, and qualify the District for $12,200,000 in State-matching grants, shall Wasco Union High School District issue $45,000,000.00 of bonds at legal interest rates, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 834, "no_votes": 524, "total_votes": 1358, "percent_yes": 61.41384388807069, "percent_no": 38.58615611192931, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.369088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.376802", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate classrooms and school facilities including upgrading and replacing plumbing, electrical, heating and air conditioning systems, build new classrooms and facilities to relieve overcrowding, repair roofs, modernize the auditorium, make health and safety improvements, improve student access to computers and modern technology, and qualify the District for $12,200,000 in State-matching grants, shall Wasco Union High School District issue $45,000,000.00 of bonds at legal interest rates, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7383, "fingerprint": "2007|200700151|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700151|KERN", "content_hash": "9be63feb428246f4", "measure_id": "200700151", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and upgrade existing schools including roof repairs, science labs, libraries, and energy efficient windows, make health and safety improvements including removing asbestos; update electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; improve playgrounds and playfields, and qualify the District for approximately $1,200,000 in State grants, shall Muroc Joint Unified School District issue $14,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent oversight, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 454, "no_votes": 385, "total_votes": 839, "percent_yes": 54.11203814064363, "percent_no": 45.88796185935637, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.368811", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.376609", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and upgrade existing schools including roof repairs, science labs, libraries, and energy efficient windows, make health and safety improvements including removing asbestos; update electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; improve playgrounds and playfields, and qualify the District for approximately $1,200,000 in State grants, shall Muroc Joint Unified School District issue $14,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent oversight, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7382, "fingerprint": "2007|200700092|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700092|KERN", "content_hash": "5970099f5ba4750c", "measure_id": "200700092", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be enacted in the City of Delano a temporary sales tax rate increase of one percent (1%) which will end after ten (10) years, the proceeds of which shall be used for essential general services including, but not limited to police and fire services, street improvements, parks and recreation, and other General Fund services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1199, "no_votes": 1053, "total_votes": 2252, "percent_yes": 53.241563055062166, "percent_no": 46.758436944937834, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.368402", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.376415", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be enacted in the City of Delano a temporary sales tax rate increase of one percent (1%) which will end after ten (10) years, the proceeds of which shall be used for essential general services including, but not limited to police and fire services, street improvements, parks and recreation, and other General Fund services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11654, "fingerprint": "2007|200700179|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700179|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "57d93ba6bea585a6", "measure_id": "200700179", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Jeff Siccama be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1514, "no_votes": 583, "total_votes": 2097, "percent_yes": 72.19837863614687, "percent_no": 27.80162136385313, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-12-18", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.406158", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.386949", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.385898", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jeff Siccama be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7401, "fingerprint": "2007|200700068|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700068|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "554540e9da4450fc", "measure_id": "200700068", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Louis Byrd be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2750, "no_votes": 1001, "total_votes": 3751, "percent_yes": 73.31378299120234, "percent_no": 26.686217008797655, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-09-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.382665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.382935", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Louis Byrd be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7402, "fingerprint": "2007|200700069|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700069|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4f78e22a7a55cdd9", "measure_id": "200700069", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Alfreddie Johnson be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2678, "no_votes": 1017, "total_votes": 3695, "percent_yes": 72.47631935047362, "percent_no": 27.523680649526383, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-09-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.382931", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.383124", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Alfreddie Johnson be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7403, "fingerprint": "2007|200700070|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700070|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "aadbdd4e4bc9686f", "measure_id": "200700070", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Fernando Pedroza be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2737, "no_votes": 989, "total_votes": 3726, "percent_yes": 73.4567901234568, "percent_no": 26.5432098765432, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-09-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.383195", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.383314", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Fernando Pedroza be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7404, "fingerprint": "2007|200700071|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700071|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e1e3d208a2c8bc65", "measure_id": "200700071", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Leticia Vasquez be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2629, "no_votes": 1153, "total_votes": 3782, "percent_yes": 69.5134849286092, "percent_no": 30.486515071390798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-09-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.383458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.383504", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Leticia Vasquez be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11648, "fingerprint": "2007|200700093|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700093|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9a5c3fd17f278d5b", "measure_id": "200700093", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the telecommunications portion of the City of El Monte\u2019s utility users\u2019 tax from 7% to 6.5% and modernize the method for calculating and collecting the telecommunications portion of the tax to reflect technological advances and changes so that all taxpayers are treated in the same manner?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2940, "no_votes": 1753, "total_votes": 4693, "percent_yes": 62.64649477945877, "percent_no": 37.35350522054123, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.403068", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.383733", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.383695", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the telecommunications portion of the City of El Monte\u2019s utility users\u2019 tax from 7% to 6.5% and modernize the method for calculating and collecting the telecommunications portion of the tax to reflect technological advances and changes so that all taxpayers are treated in the same manner?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11647, "fingerprint": "2007|200700064|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700064|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "90ab65449365967a", "measure_id": "200700064", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide all children with the same quality classrooms, modern technology and facilities, shall the Wiseburn School District build a new Cabrillo Elementary School to replace the nearly 60-year old facility, construct, acquire and improve school facilities, and make the District eligible to receive $4,000,000 in state matching funds by issuing $32,600,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with annual audits, a taxpayers' oversight committee and no increase in annual tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1477, "no_votes": 301, "total_votes": 1778, "percent_yes": 83.07086614173228, "percent_no": 16.92913385826772, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-12", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.401589", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.382391", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.382742", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide all children with the same quality classrooms, modern technology and facilities, shall the Wiseburn School District build a new Cabrillo Elementary School to replace the nearly 60-year old facility, construct, acquire and improve school facilities, and make the District eligible to receive $4,000,000 in state matching funds by issuing $32,600,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with annual audits, a taxpayers' oversight committee and no increase in annual tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11645, "fingerprint": "2007|200700041|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700041|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0a29317c096387f2", "measure_id": "200700041", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Measure A would amend the City of Arcadia General Plan to allow the City's Zoning Code to be amended to restrict automobile sales from occurring on the City Block bounded by Huntington Drive, Santa Anita Avenue and Morlan Place.  It would also deem \"permitted\" as of right certain existing land uses that may not otherwise be permitted or may only be permitted pursuant to a conditional use permit.  If both Measures A and B pass, whichever of the two initiatives receives the most votes prevails.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1463, "no_votes": 4207, "total_votes": 5670, "percent_yes": 25.80246913580247, "percent_no": 74.19753086419753, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.400735", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.381340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.382160", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Measure A would amend the City of Arcadia General Plan to allow the City's Zoning Code to be amended to restrict automobile sales from occurring on the City Block bounded by Huntington Drive, Santa Anita Avenue and Morlan Place.  It would also deem \"permitted\" as of right certain existing land uses that may not otherwise be permitted or may only be permitted pursuant to a conditional use permit.  If both Measures A and B pass, whichever of the two initiatives receives the most votes prevails.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11638, "fingerprint": "2007|200700032|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700032|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d5b55ab3bde44d31", "measure_id": "200700032", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition A which amends the Long Beach City Charter by: modifying the Mayoral veto to require a 2/3 City Council vote to override; creating a line-item Mayoral veto of the City's annual budget; modifying the Mayor/City Council authority to appoint and remove the City Manager and City Clerk, and to confirm the appointment of the Assistant City Manager; and modifying the Mayor/City Council authority to remove Commissioners, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15045, "no_votes": 10765, "total_votes": 25810, "percent_yes": 58.291359938008526, "percent_no": 41.708640061991474, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-01", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.398494", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.378877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.380604", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition A which amends the Long Beach City Charter by: modifying the Mayoral veto to require a 2/3 City Council vote to override; creating a line-item Mayoral veto of the City's annual budget; modifying the Mayor/City Council authority to appoint and remove the City Manager and City Clerk, and to confirm the appointment of the Assistant City Manager; and modifying the Mayor/City Council authority to remove Commissioners, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11635, "fingerprint": "2007|200700018|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700018|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0cf044778aad1295", "measure_id": "200700018", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Burbank Municipal Code be amended to allow the City Council to increase the City\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax from 10 percent to a maximum rate of 12 percent on persons occupying a room in a hotel, motel, inn or other lodging facility within the City for less than 30 days?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4647, "no_votes": 4947, "total_votes": 9594, "percent_yes": 48.43652282676673, "percent_no": 51.56347717323327, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-10", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.395754", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.373254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.378825", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Burbank Municipal Code be amended to allow the City Council to increase the City\u2019s existing transient occupancy tax from 10 percent to a maximum rate of 12 percent on persons occupying a room in a hotel, motel, inn or other lodging facility within the City for less than 30 days?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11634, "fingerprint": "2007|200700008|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700008|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fc0c3e2cc6468b78", "measure_id": "200700008", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to levy a special tax on each eligible parcel in the City from July 1, 2007 (when the existing special tax expires) until June 30, 2017 to finance fire and paramedic services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2243, "no_votes": 327, "total_votes": 2570, "percent_yes": 87.27626459143968, "percent_no": 12.723735408560316, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.394272", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.370572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.377868", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to levy a special tax on each eligible parcel in the City from July 1, 2007 (when the existing special tax expires) until June 30, 2017 to finance fire and paramedic services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7385, "fingerprint": "2007|200700004|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700004|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4eb43c4a3187e063", "measure_id": "200700004", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue funding general city services including maintaining police services and equipment; fire protection and paramedic services; street maintenance; and services for senior citizens, libraries, parks and recreation; shall the City of Covina update and extend for only 10 years its 6% Utility Users Tax and city ordinance to fund general city services, without increasing the current tax rate, including mandatory annual financial audits and ensuring all funds stay local to maintain Covina city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1413, "no_votes": 2078, "total_votes": 3491, "percent_yes": 40.475508450300765, "percent_no": 59.524491549699235, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.369364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.376996", "update_count": 8, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding general city services including maintaining police services and equipment; fire protection and paramedic services; street maintenance; and services for senior citizens, libraries, parks and recreation; shall the City of Covina update and extend for only 10 years its 6% Utility Users Tax and city ordinance to fund general city services, without increasing the current tax rate, including mandatory annual financial audits and ensuring all funds stay local to maintain Covina city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7405, "fingerprint": "2007|200700097|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700097|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e1c012c3f9b75f65", "measure_id": "200700097", "measure_letter": "AV", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the 3% increase in the Utility User\u2019s Tax is approved, should not less than 65% of the funds generated by the increase be expended for infrastructure improvements, such as repair, replacement and improvement of water lines, reservoirs, sewer facilities, streets, sidewalks, parks, public buildings and other such infrastructure facilities and not more than 35% of such funds be expended for employee salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2234, "no_votes": 726, "total_votes": 2960, "percent_yes": 75.47297297297297, "percent_no": 24.52702702702703, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.384843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.384495", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the 3% increase in the Utility User\u2019s Tax is approved, should not less than 65% of the funds generated by the increase be expended for infrastructure improvements, such as repair, replacement and improvement of water lines, reservoirs, sewer facilities, streets, sidewalks, parks, public buildings and other such infrastructure facilities and not more than 35% of such funds be expended for employee salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11646, "fingerprint": "2007|200700042|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700042|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "beeeebd167af289d", "measure_id": "200700042", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the Arcadia Municipal Code and Redevelopment Plan to (1) eliminate the use of eminent domain for purposes of taking private property for private use, (2) promote economic development and (3) protect existing land uses in the Central Business District Zone, and (4) preserve the rights of private property owners to reasonably and lawfully use and develop their property, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4243, "no_votes": 1534, "total_votes": 5777, "percent_yes": 73.44642548035313, "percent_no": 26.553574519646872, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.400963", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.381752", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.382354", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the Arcadia Municipal Code and Redevelopment Plan to (1) eliminate the use of eminent domain for purposes of taking private property for private use, (2) promote economic development and (3) protect existing land uses in the Central Business District Zone, and (4) preserve the rights of private property owners to reasonably and lawfully use and develop their property, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11639, "fingerprint": "2007|200700033|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700033|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b506c0c754e93cfb", "measure_id": "200700033", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition B, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by: creating an Independent Salary Commission to set the salary for City Councilmembers; creating an Ethics Commission to advise the City Council on ethics regulations and requiring the City to adopt and maintain a Code of Ethics; and creating a Redistricting Commission to review and recommend new City Council district boundaries every ten (10) years, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8897, "no_votes": 16981, "total_votes": 25878, "percent_yes": 34.38055491150784, "percent_no": 65.61944508849216, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-01", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.398850", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.379271", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.380799", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition B, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by: creating an Independent Salary Commission to set the salary for City Councilmembers; creating an Ethics Commission to advise the City Council on ethics regulations and requiring the City to adopt and maintain a Code of Ethics; and creating a Redistricting Commission to review and recommend new City Council district boundaries every ten (10) years, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7393, "fingerprint": "2007|200700019|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700019|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "12aaed121cd27cad", "measure_id": "200700019", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the section of the Charter relating to the duties and powers of the City Clerk be revised to, among other things, provide for an appointed City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4482, "no_votes": 5093, "total_votes": 9575, "percent_yes": 46.80939947780679, "percent_no": 53.19060052219321, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-10", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.374168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.379030", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the section of the Charter relating to the duties and powers of the City Clerk be revised to, among other things, provide for an appointed City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11650, "fingerprint": "2007|200700095|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700095|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1af844605178d609", "measure_id": "200700095", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would amend the City\u2019s existing Storm Drain User Fee (which provides a dedicated funding source to repair, reconstruct and maintain the citywide storm drain system and install filtration devices that reduce polluted runoff and protect coastal water quality) by: (1) shortening the duration of the Fee from thirty years to ten years and (2) establishing a resident oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3881, "no_votes": 3108, "total_votes": 6989, "percent_yes": 55.53011875804836, "percent_no": 44.46988124195164, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.403611", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.384292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.384099", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would amend the City\u2019s existing Storm Drain User Fee (which provides a dedicated funding source to repair, reconstruct and maintain the citywide storm drain system and install filtration devices that reduce polluted runoff and protect coastal water quality) by: (1) shortening the duration of the Fee from thirty years to ten years and (2) establishing a resident oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11640, "fingerprint": "2007|200700034|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700034|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "56e301fa24e00118", "measure_id": "200700034", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition C, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by: modifying the term limits for the Mayor and City Council offices from two terms to three terms; and modifying the term limits for members of the Harbor and Water Commissions to three four-year terms be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8141, "no_votes": 17767, "total_votes": 25908, "percent_yes": 31.42272657094334, "percent_no": 68.57727342905666, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-01", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.399138", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.379650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.380994", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition C, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by: modifying the term limits for the Mayor and City Council offices from two terms to three terms; and modifying the term limits for members of the Harbor and Water Commissions to three four-year terms be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11637, "fingerprint": "2007|200700025|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700025|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a3724b809496b717", "measure_id": "200700025", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended effective July 1, 2007, to authorize annual salaries of $58,000 for the Mayor and $46,000 for each Council Member as compensation for their duties with no compensation authorized for them as Members of boards, commissions, and similar bodies; to be adjusted annually as a percentage of that salary prescribed by law for judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1084, "no_votes": 1784, "total_votes": 2868, "percent_yes": 37.79637377963737, "percent_no": 62.20362622036263, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.397902", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.377355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.380220", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended effective July 1, 2007, to authorize annual salaries of $58,000 for the Mayor and $46,000 for each Council Member as compensation for their duties with no compensation authorized for them as Members of boards, commissions, and similar bodies; to be adjusted annually as a percentage of that salary prescribed by law for judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11636, "fingerprint": "2007|200700020|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700020|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8e9b60647b0b1f84", "measure_id": "200700020", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the section of the Charter relating to the duties and powers of the City Treasurer be revised to, among other things, provide for an appointed City Treasurer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4329, "no_votes": 5028, "total_votes": 9357, "percent_yes": 46.26482847066367, "percent_no": 53.73517152933633, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-10", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.396426", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.374746", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.379224", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the section of the Charter relating to the duties and powers of the City Treasurer be revised to, among other things, provide for an appointed City Treasurer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7389, "fingerprint": "2007|200700009|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700009|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "45a0c9252c3224f0", "measure_id": "200700009", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance imposing a \"Library Special Tax\" be extended which: (1) can only be used exclusively to fund a portion of operational costs of the Central and branch libraries; (2) exempts religious facilities, community service organizations and persons meeting certain income criteria; (3) limits annual increases based on the Consumer Price Index; (4) prevents imposition of Tax if certain General Fund commitments to the Library are not made; and (5) contains a fifteen-year limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10372, "no_votes": 2524, "total_votes": 12896, "percent_yes": 80.42803970223325, "percent_no": 19.57196029776675, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.370903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.378058", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance imposing a \"Library Special Tax\" be extended which: (1) can only be used exclusively to fund a portion of operational costs of the Central and branch libraries; (2) exempts religious facilities, community service organizations and persons meeting certain income criteria; (3) limits annual increases based on the Consumer Price Index; (4) prevents imposition of Tax if certain General Fund commitments to the Library are not made; and (5) contains a fifteen-year limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11651, "fingerprint": "2007|200700096|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700096|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "af4d36ba96fa3193", "measure_id": "200700096", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would repeal the City\u2019s existing Storm Drain User Fee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3046, "no_votes": 3887, "total_votes": 6933, "percent_yes": 43.93480455791144, "percent_no": 56.06519544208856, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.403882", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.384572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.384302", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would repeal the City\u2019s existing Storm Drain User Fee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11641, "fingerprint": "2007|200700035|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700035|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ace9fd70e3b0a0cf", "measure_id": "200700035", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition D, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by: modifying the residency requirements for City Council candidates; prohibiting a candidate from running for two City elective offices at the same time; permitting the name of a termed-out candidate to appear on a run-off election ballot if that candidate qualifies in the primary election, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15952, "no_votes": 9172, "total_votes": 25124, "percent_yes": 63.49307435121796, "percent_no": 36.50692564878204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-01", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.399409", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.379945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.381183", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition D, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by: modifying the residency requirements for City Council candidates; prohibiting a candidate from running for two City elective offices at the same time; permitting the name of a termed-out candidate to appear on a run-off election ballot if that candidate qualifies in the primary election, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7394, "fingerprint": "2007|200700021|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700021|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "10640a70898e5329", "measure_id": "200700021", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a section be added to the Charter to provide for the orderly transition from elected to appointed City Clerk and City Treasurer should the foregoing measures be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4820, "no_votes": 4428, "total_votes": 9248, "percent_yes": 52.11937716262975, "percent_no": 47.88062283737025, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-10", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.375193", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.379413", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a section be added to the Charter to provide for the orderly transition from elected to appointed City Clerk and City Treasurer should the foregoing measures be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11652, "fingerprint": "2007|200700154|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700154|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "484174f8b97b3ac5", "measure_id": "200700154", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high academic achievement in science, math, reading, and the arts, provide needed textbooks and instructional materials and student counseling/support services, shall the Las Virgenes Unified School District maintain its expiring school parcel tax of $98/year, without increase, per parcel for eight years with exemptions available for seniors and disabled persons, an independent fiscal oversight committee, with no funds used for administrator\u2019s salaries and every dollar staying in this community to preserve quality education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4753, "no_votes": 1307, "total_votes": 6060, "percent_yes": 78.43234323432343, "percent_no": 21.567656765676574, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.404986", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.385668", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.385094", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high academic achievement in science, math, reading, and the arts, provide needed textbooks and instructional materials and student counseling/support services, shall the Las Virgenes Unified School District maintain its expiring school parcel tax of $98/year, without increase, per parcel for eight years with exemptions available for seniors and disabled persons, an independent fiscal oversight committee, with no funds used for administrator\u2019s salaries and every dollar staying in this community to preserve quality education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11642, "fingerprint": "2007|200700036|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700036|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b8fab1132ca89b4a", "measure_id": "200700036", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition E, which amends the Long Beach Charter to require that certain City park and recreation areas shall not be sold or otherwise transferred without either a majority vote of the people, or the replacement of such property by the City at a ratio of at least two to one (2:1) subject to certain additional requirements, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19213, "no_votes": 6459, "total_votes": 25672, "percent_yes": 74.84029292614521, "percent_no": 25.15970707385479, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-01", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.399693", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.380237", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.381384", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition E, which amends the Long Beach Charter to require that certain City park and recreation areas shall not be sold or otherwise transferred without either a majority vote of the people, or the replacement of such property by the City at a ratio of at least two to one (2:1) subject to certain additional requirements, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7395, "fingerprint": "2007|200700022|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700022|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7fe644cc26d8da00", "measure_id": "200700022", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter section relating to vacancies in elective offices be revised as to how such vacancies are determined and filled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5190, "no_votes": 4003, "total_votes": 9193, "percent_yes": 56.45599912977265, "percent_no": 43.54400087022735, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-10", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.375654", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.379618", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter section relating to vacancies in elective offices be revised as to how such vacancies are determined and filled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11643, "fingerprint": "2007|200700037|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700037|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0f66fba87df1f737", "measure_id": "200700037", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition F, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by removing the duty of the City Prosecutor to prosecute hearings before the Civil Service Commission, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14936, "no_votes": 10130, "total_votes": 25066, "percent_yes": 59.58669113540254, "percent_no": 40.41330886459746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-01", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.399966", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.380518", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.381579", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition F, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by removing the duty of the City Prosecutor to prosecute hearings before the Civil Service Commission, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7396, "fingerprint": "2007|200700023|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700023|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "85dbe04a6761310d", "measure_id": "200700023", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter section relating to the City budget be revised to, among other things, provide that the City budget may be adopted and amended by a majority vote of the Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4934, "no_votes": 4294, "total_votes": 9228, "percent_yes": 53.4677069787603, "percent_no": 46.5322930212397, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-10", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.376130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.379836", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter section relating to the City budget be revised to, among other things, provide that the City budget may be adopted and amended by a majority vote of the Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11644, "fingerprint": "2007|200700038|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700038|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bbc9a28503cc3d46", "measure_id": "200700038", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition G, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by deleting obsolete provisions regarding outdated tax, fiscal year and financial account descriptions, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17760, "no_votes": 7626, "total_votes": 25386, "percent_yes": 69.95982037343418, "percent_no": 30.040179626565816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-01", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.400231", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.380789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.381769", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition G, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by deleting obsolete provisions regarding outdated tax, fiscal year and financial account descriptions, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7397, "fingerprint": "2007|200700024|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700024|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b91d9e7a0c807eb8", "measure_id": "200700024", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed new Charter which would amend, revise and restate the current Charter be ratified, with those Charter changes otherwise approved in this election, and shall the City Clerk be given the authority to renumber the Charter sections as necessary or appropriate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5252, "no_votes": 3890, "total_votes": 9142, "percent_yes": 57.44913585648654, "percent_no": 42.55086414351346, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-10", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.376672", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.380028", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed new Charter which would amend, revise and restate the current Charter be ratified, with those Charter changes otherwise approved in this election, and shall the City Clerk be given the authority to renumber the Charter sections as necessary or appropriate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11649, "fingerprint": "2007|200700094|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700094|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "73f212e098e060cc", "measure_id": "200700094", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that 1) reduces the local telephone/cable television tax rate from 6% to 5\u00bd%, 2) protects the tax against changes in federal law, 3) includes new communication technologies, and 4) retains existing exemptions for seniors and the disabled, with revenue continuing to be used exclusively in Hermosa Beach for essential services such as 911 emergency response, fire, police, and sewer and street repairs, with continued public review of the City budget?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2243, "no_votes": 867, "total_votes": 3110, "percent_yes": 72.12218649517685, "percent_no": 27.877813504823152, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.403343", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.384018", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.383899", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that 1) reduces the local telephone/cable television tax rate from 6% to 5\u00bd%, 2) protects the tax against changes in federal law, 3) includes new communication technologies, and 4) retains existing exemptions for seniors and the disabled, with revenue continuing to be used exclusively in Hermosa Beach for essential services such as 911 emergency response, fire, police, and sewer and street repairs, with continued public review of the City budget?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7399, "fingerprint": "2007|200700039|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700039|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "de0397f4afa5b9dd", "measure_id": "200700039", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Proposition H, the Police and Fire Public Safety Oil Production Act, which amends the Long Beach Municipal Code to provide dedicated funds for police officers and firefighters by assessing an additional twenty-five cent ($0.25) per barrel special production tax on oil producers in Long Beach, with a CPI adjustment, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17985, "no_votes": 7641, "total_votes": 25626, "percent_yes": 70.18262701943338, "percent_no": 29.817372980566617, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-01", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.381059", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.381965", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Proposition H, the Police and Fire Public Safety Oil Production Act, which amends the Long Beach Municipal Code to provide dedicated funds for police officers and firefighters by assessing an additional twenty-five cent ($0.25) per barrel special production tax on oil producers in Long Beach, with a CPI adjustment, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11653, "fingerprint": "2007|200700155|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700155|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e967c8f91902c86a", "measure_id": "200700155", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, repair, and improve Lennox charter high school facilities, including classrooms, science labs, and support facilities and improve student access to computers and modern technology, shall the Lennox School District be authorized to issue $10,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, no money for overhead or administrator salaries, and provided all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 682, "no_votes": 199, "total_votes": 881, "percent_yes": 77.41203178206584, "percent_no": 22.58796821793416, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.405244", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.385985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.385292", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, repair, and improve Lennox charter high school facilities, including classrooms, science labs, and support facilities and improve student access to computers and modern technology, shall the Lennox School District be authorized to issue $10,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, no money for overhead or administrator salaries, and provided all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7388, "fingerprint": "2007|200700007|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700007|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c029934a15d75d3e", "measure_id": "200700007", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to rebuild the small and outdated Monrovia Public Library at its current site according to new earthquake, fire safety, energy efficiency and handicapped accessibility standards, with expanded children\u2019s reading areas, upgraded computer technology, new study rooms for students and quiet reading areas, by imposing a special parcel tax with expenditures subject to annual independent audits and no expenditures for administrator\u2019s salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2751, "no_votes": 1210, "total_votes": 3961, "percent_yes": 69.45215854582176, "percent_no": 30.54784145417824, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.370293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.377663", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to rebuild the small and outdated Monrovia Public Library at its current site according to new earthquake, fire safety, energy efficiency and handicapped accessibility standards, with expanded children\u2019s reading areas, upgraded computer technology, new study rooms for students and quiet reading areas, by imposing a special parcel tax with expenditures subject to annual independent audits and no expenditures for administrator\u2019s salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7386, "fingerprint": "2007|200700005|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700005|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fffb155d0410440d", "measure_id": "200700005", "measure_letter": "LAUSD-L", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Los Angeles Charter be amended to establish: contribution limits and additional disclosure requirements for School Board campaigns; local enforcement of School District campaign finance rules; campaign finance training for School Board candidates; term limits of three terms (twelve years) for School Board members; and a School Board compensation review committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 100947, "no_votes": 49942, "total_votes": 150889, "percent_yes": 66.90149712702716, "percent_no": 33.098502872972844, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.369642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.377190", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Los Angeles Charter be amended to establish: contribution limits and additional disclosure requirements for School Board campaigns; local enforcement of School District campaign finance rules; campaign finance training for School Board candidates; term limits of three terms (twelve years) for School Board members; and a School Board compensation review committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7387, "fingerprint": "2007|200700006|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700006|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "404c7124164b6d5a", "measure_id": "200700006", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to authorize the Council of the City of Los Angeles to establish a voluntary program to allow members to purchase service credit with the Fire and Police Pension Plan for full-time service with other public agencies, provided the member pays the full actuarial cost for the service purchased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84690, "no_votes": 56014, "total_votes": 140704, "percent_yes": 60.19018649078917, "percent_no": 39.80981350921083, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.370010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.377379", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to authorize the Council of the City of Los Angeles to establish a voluntary program to allow members to purchase service credit with the Fire and Police Pension Plan for full-time service with other public agencies, provided the member pays the full actuarial cost for the service purchased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7400, "fingerprint": "2007|200700063|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700063|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "736ff25e7c60a1bb", "measure_id": "200700063", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue funding quality education programs; preserve small class sizes; retain highly qualified teachers/employees; provide up-to-date textbooks/instructional materials; keep pace with advances in classroom technology; and support educational programs that enhance student achievement, shall the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District extend its expiring school parcel tax for five years at $209 per parcel with an independent citizens' oversight committee and an exemption for seniors, age 65 or over, and all money staying locally to benefit our schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8058, "no_votes": 1976, "total_votes": 10034, "percent_yes": 80.3069563484154, "percent_no": 19.693043651584603, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.382029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.382547", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding quality education programs; preserve small class sizes; retain highly qualified teachers/employees; provide up-to-date textbooks/instructional materials; keep pace with advances in classroom technology; and support educational programs that enhance student achievement, shall the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District extend its expiring school parcel tax for five years at $209 per parcel with an independent citizens' oversight committee and an exemption for seniors, age 65 or over, and all money staying locally to benefit our schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7392, "fingerprint": "2007|200700014|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700014|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dfabc49f000c6e2e", "measure_id": "200700014", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to continue funding quality educational programs and classroom instruction, prevent increases in class sizes and reductions in teaching positions, attract and retain high quality teachers and employees, and support educational programs that enhance student achievement, shall San Marino Unified School District extend the expiring school parcel tax for six years at $295 per parcel with an exemption for seniors, adjustment for inflation and all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2315, "no_votes": 921, "total_votes": 3236, "percent_yes": 71.5389369592089, "percent_no": 28.461063040791103, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.372148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.378630", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to continue funding quality educational programs and classroom instruction, prevent increases in class sizes and reductions in teaching positions, attract and retain high quality teachers and employees, and support educational programs that enhance student achievement, shall San Marino Unified School District extend the expiring school parcel tax for six years at $295 per parcel with an exemption for seniors, adjustment for inflation and all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7408, "fingerprint": "2007|200700156|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700156|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fe5ef91ff1a06b17", "measure_id": "200700156", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract/retain quality teachers, improve instruction, student health and safety, and classroom facilities, qualify for $25,000,000 in State matching funds, shall Walnut Valley Unified School District repair, renovate, acquire, construct, and equip classrooms, science labs, sites, school facilities, including upgrading outdated bathrooms, plumbing, roofs, computer technology, fire safety equipment, and earthquake retrofit classrooms, by issuing $64,600,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4159, "no_votes": 2638, "total_votes": 6797, "percent_yes": 61.188759746947184, "percent_no": 38.811240253052816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.386299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.385490", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract/retain quality teachers, improve instruction, student health and safety, and classroom facilities, qualify for $25,000,000 in State matching funds, shall Walnut Valley Unified School District repair, renovate, acquire, construct, and equip classrooms, science labs, sites, school facilities, including upgrading outdated bathrooms, plumbing, roofs, computer technology, fire safety equipment, and earthquake retrofit classrooms, by issuing $64,600,000 of bonds at legal rates, with mandatory audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7390, "fingerprint": "2007|200700010|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700010|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "26aa879d433c8e4e", "measure_id": "200700010", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer change from an elected office to an appointed position?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 739, "no_votes": 1615, "total_votes": 2354, "percent_yes": 31.39337298215803, "percent_no": 68.60662701784197, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.371176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.378252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer change from an elected office to an appointed position?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7391, "fingerprint": "2007|200700011|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700011|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b30ee5146487683d", "measure_id": "200700011", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to extend the 5% Utility User's Tax, for general City purposes, for eight years from August 1, 2007 to July 31, 2015?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2946, "no_votes": 1173, "total_votes": 4119, "percent_yes": 71.52221412964312, "percent_no": 28.477785870356882, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.371445", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.378439", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to extend the 5% Utility User's Tax, for general City purposes, for eight years from August 1, 2007 to July 31, 2015?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7406, "fingerprint": "2007|200700098|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700098|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b2accf0328db4c9b", "measure_id": "200700098", "measure_letter": "UT", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the existing Utility User\u2019s Tax by 3% for the limited period of February 1, 2008 to March 5, 2013?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1690, "no_votes": 1472, "total_votes": 3162, "percent_yes": 53.4471853257432, "percent_no": 46.5528146742568, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.385116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.384697", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the existing Utility User\u2019s Tax by 3% for the limited period of February 1, 2008 to March 5, 2013?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7398, "fingerprint": "2007|200700026|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700026|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "afb6b89f9b14e9a6", "measure_id": "200700026", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City's General Plan and zoning ordinance to establish the following limits on new construction in the Central Core Area of the City and to require voter approval for any exception to these limits: two stories and thirty feet in height and thirteen dwelling units per acre except as required by the state density bonus law for certain affordable housing projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1870, "no_votes": 1759, "total_votes": 3629, "percent_yes": 51.52934692752824, "percent_no": 48.47065307247176, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.378078", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.380411", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City's General Plan and zoning ordinance to establish the following limits on new construction in the Central Core Area of the City and to require voter approval for any exception to these limits: two stories and thirty feet in height and thirteen dwelling units per acre except as required by the state density bonus law for certain affordable housing projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7407, "fingerprint": "2007|200700153|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700153|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "990463a8f6045a11", "measure_id": "200700153", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe school overcrowding, build two new high schools, upgrade facilities at existing high schools, and acquire, repair, construct and equip classrooms, labs, schools, sites and facilities, shall the Antelope Valley Joint Union High School District issue $240 million in bonds at legal interest rates and appoint a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee to ensure that bond monies are used for voter-approved purposes only and that no monies are used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10518, "no_votes": 10205, "total_votes": 20723, "percent_yes": 50.75519953674661, "percent_no": 49.24480046325339, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.385390", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.384895", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe school overcrowding, build two new high schools, upgrade facilities at existing high schools, and acquire, repair, construct and equip classrooms, labs, schools, sites and facilities, shall the Antelope Valley Joint Union High School District issue $240 million in bonds at legal interest rates and appoint a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee to ensure that bond monies are used for voter-approved purposes only and that no monies are used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7409, "fingerprint": "2007|200700157|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700157|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f9f55b637d70cc38", "measure_id": "200700157", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide a healthy learning environment and improve student health and safety, shall Walnut Valley Unified School District issue $15,200,000 in bonds at legal rates to improve school grounds, fields and facilities, including upgrading unsafe tracks, gyms and equipment, adding tennis courts, constructing a Diamond Bar High School pool, and completing necessary upgrades to athletic facilities; with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3859, "no_votes": 2925, "total_votes": 6784, "percent_yes": 56.88384433962265, "percent_no": 43.11615566037735, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.386681", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.385698", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a healthy learning environment and improve student health and safety, shall Walnut Valley Unified School District issue $15,200,000 in bonds at legal rates to improve school grounds, fields and facilities, including upgrading unsafe tracks, gyms and equipment, adding tennis courts, constructing a Diamond Bar High School pool, and completing necessary upgrades to athletic facilities; with mandatory audits, independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11655, "fingerprint": "2007|200700158|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700158|MARIN", "content_hash": "f7599ea757b62081", "measure_id": "200700158", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain and enhance the quality of public education in Tiburon, Belvedere, and east Corte Madera by providing continued support for small classes, exceptional instructional programs, essential curriculum development, and professional training, shall the Reed Union School District be authorized to renew a special assessment commencing July 1, 2008 for a maximum of eight years at the rate of $319.00 per parcel per year with a 3% yearly adjustment and an exemption for property owners age 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2299, "no_votes": 1050, "total_votes": 3349, "percent_yes": 68.64735742012542, "percent_no": 31.352642579874583, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.407400", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.388066", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.386677", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain and enhance the quality of public education in Tiburon, Belvedere, and east Corte Madera by providing continued support for small classes, exceptional instructional programs, essential curriculum development, and professional training, shall the Reed Union School District be authorized to renew a special assessment commencing July 1, 2008 for a maximum of eight years at the rate of $319.00 per parcel per year with a 3% yearly adjustment and an exemption for property owners age 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7411, "fingerprint": "2007|200700015|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700015|MARIN", "content_hash": "50b60ce1e81983e9", "measure_id": "200700015", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain small class size, science, technology, library, fine arts, Spanish, learning lab and other programs, shall the Ross School District extend its previously approved parcel tax for a period of eight (8) years at the rate of $626.98 in the first year, and at such rate plus an annual 3% cost-of-living adjustment for each year thereafter, beginning July 1, 2007, with exemptions available for property owners age 65 or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 756, "no_votes": 186, "total_votes": 942, "percent_yes": 80.2547770700637, "percent_no": 19.745222929936304, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.387528", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.386282", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain small class size, science, technology, library, fine arts, Spanish, learning lab and other programs, shall the Ross School District extend its previously approved parcel tax for a period of eight (8) years at the rate of $626.98 in the first year, and at such rate plus an annual 3% cost-of-living adjustment for each year thereafter, beginning July 1, 2007, with exemptions available for property owners age 65 or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7410, "fingerprint": "2007|200700002|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700002|MARIN", "content_hash": "03812e1f9ff5bd99", "measure_id": "200700002", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the existing parcel tax of Nine Hundred Twenty Five Dollars ($925.00) on each parcel be increased to One Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($1,200.00) within County Service Area No. 29 annually and extended for a period of ten (10) years, commencing in FY 2007-2008, terminating in FY 2017- 2018, to provide funds for ongoing maintenance dredging in the principal waterways of Paradise Cay along with the north and south entry channels to San Francisco Bay?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 105, "no_votes": 7, "total_votes": 112, "percent_yes": 93.75, "percent_no": 6.25, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.387216", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.386089", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing parcel tax of Nine Hundred Twenty Five Dollars ($925.00) on each parcel be increased to One Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($1,200.00) within County Service Area No. 29 annually and extended for a period of ten (10) years, commencing in FY 2007-2008, terminating in FY 2017- 2018, to provide funds for ongoing maintenance dredging in the principal waterways of Paradise Cay along with the north and south entry channels to San Francisco Bay?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7412, "fingerprint": "2007|200700044|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700044|MARIN", "content_hash": "ab7f69ba5beb31da", "measure_id": "200700044", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve funding for important educational programs in grades 7-12, keep school libraries open, maintain music and fine arts programs, maintain reduced class sizes, provide up-to-date computer and technology instruction, and attract and retain qualified and experienced teachers, shall the Petaluma Joint Union High School District continue its existing tax of $50 per parcel without increasing taxes, with an exemption for seniors, and with all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 79, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 106, "percent_yes": 74.52830188679245, "percent_no": 25.47169811320755, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.387798", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.386476", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve funding for important educational programs in grades 7-12, keep school libraries open, maintain music and fine arts programs, maintain reduced class sizes, provide up-to-date computer and technology instruction, and attract and retain qualified and experienced teachers, shall the Petaluma Joint Union High School District continue its existing tax of $50 per parcel without increasing taxes, with an exemption for seniors, and with all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7413, "fingerprint": "2007|200700099|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700099|MERCED", "content_hash": "ebf80addb83fc290", "measure_id": "200700099", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 402 of the City Charter be amended to provide that the Mayor and Members of the City Council receive the same salary as their counterparts in general law cities do pursuant to Government Code Section 36516?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3056, "no_votes": 3912, "total_votes": 6968, "percent_yes": 43.85763490241102, "percent_no": 56.14236509758898, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.388422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.386872", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 402 of the City Charter be amended to provide that the Mayor and Members of the City Council receive the same salary as their counterparts in general law cities do pursuant to Government Code Section 36516?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7414, "fingerprint": "2007|200700100|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700100|MERCED", "content_hash": "988bd795ad23f711", "measure_id": "200700100", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 1050 to 1057 be added to the City Charter, limiting campaign contributions for the Mayor and Members of the City Council to $500 per person and $2,000 per entity for each election cycle?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5293, "no_votes": 1670, "total_votes": 6963, "percent_yes": 76.01608502082435, "percent_no": 23.98391497917565, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.388749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.387062", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 1050 to 1057 be added to the City Charter, limiting campaign contributions for the Mayor and Members of the City Council to $500 per person and $2,000 per entity for each election cycle?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7415, "fingerprint": "2007|200700101|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700101|MERCED", "content_hash": "6dfc2f607989fd3f", "measure_id": "200700101", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall various sections of the City Charter be updated to eliminate obsolete provisions and promote efficient City operations, including, for example, raising the public works bid threshold from $5,000 to $50,000, indexing various provisions for inflation, removing department heads from civil service and making them at-will employees, and making related amendments to the Charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4353, "no_votes": 2488, "total_votes": 6841, "percent_yes": 63.63104809238416, "percent_no": 36.36895190761584, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.389019", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.387252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall various sections of the City Charter be updated to eliminate obsolete provisions and promote efficient City operations, including, for example, raising the public works bid threshold from $5,000 to $50,000, indexing various provisions for inflation, removing department heads from civil service and making them at-will employees, and making related amendments to the Charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7416, "fingerprint": "2007|200700159|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700159|MONO", "content_hash": "b772a0408e8d1286", "measure_id": "200700159", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure reliable funding for our schools in order to maintain current classroom programs, provide books and classroom materials for students, update computers, provide technology support, keep smaller class sizes and retain high quality teachers, shall the Mammoth Unified School District be authorized to implement a limited four-year instructional parcel tax of $59 per taxable parcel to be overseen by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee with exemptions for primary residences of owners age sixty-five and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1036, "no_votes": 478, "total_votes": 1514, "percent_yes": 68.42800528401585, "percent_no": 31.571994715984147, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.389294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.387444", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure reliable funding for our schools in order to maintain current classroom programs, provide books and classroom materials for students, update computers, provide technology support, keep smaller class sizes and retain high quality teachers, shall the Mammoth Unified School District be authorized to implement a limited four-year instructional parcel tax of $59 per taxable parcel to be overseen by a citizens\u2019 oversight committee with exemptions for primary residences of owners age sixty-five and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7417, "fingerprint": "2007|200700050|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700050|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d6af84efebba41ea", "measure_id": "200700050", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the citizen-circulated general plan initiative entitled \"Amendment of the Monterey County General Plan, including the North County Land Use Plan\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27357, "no_votes": 35281, "total_votes": 62638, "percent_yes": 43.67476611641495, "percent_no": 56.32523388358505, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.389576", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.387648", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the citizen-circulated general plan initiative entitled \"Amendment of the Monterey County General Plan, including the North County Land Use Plan\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7418, "fingerprint": "2007|200700051|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700051|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c5a2db2c18cd5032", "measure_id": "200700051", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the 2006 County General Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 3, 2007, by Resolution No. 07-007 be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28949, "no_votes": 32983, "total_votes": 61932, "percent_yes": 46.74320222179164, "percent_no": 53.25679777820836, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.389889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.387843", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the 2006 County General Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 3, 2007, by Resolution No. 07-007 be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7419, "fingerprint": "2007|200700052|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700052|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "3f9bfe9f215b6a19", "measure_id": "200700052", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the 2006 County General Plan enacted by the Board of Supervisors on January 3, 2007, by Resolution No. 07-007 be adopted by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27821, "no_votes": 33922, "total_votes": 61743, "percent_yes": 45.05935895567108, "percent_no": 54.94064104432892, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.390184", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.388035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the 2006 County General Plan enacted by the Board of Supervisors on January 3, 2007, by Resolution No. 07-007 be adopted by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7420, "fingerprint": "2007|200700053|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700053|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "bb4378cdc7e0536a", "measure_id": "200700053", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 05-305 amending the Monterey County General Plan Goal No. 30 and Policy Nos. 25.1.1, 30.0.3, and 39.2.1; the Greater Salinas Area Plan Land Use Plan (Figure 13), Policy Nos. 26.1.4.1, 39.1.4.1, 40.1.1.1, Part II Chapter V defining commercial land use designations in the Area Plan; and amending certain guidelines in the Rancho San Juan Area of Development Concentration (ADC) Development Guidelines and Principles adopted pursuant to Policy 26.1.4.1, be adopted by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22128, "no_votes": 38646, "total_votes": 60774, "percent_yes": 36.41030703919439, "percent_no": 63.58969296080561, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.390453", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.388230", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 05-305 amending the Monterey County General Plan Goal No. 30 and Policy Nos. 25.1.1, 30.0.3, and 39.2.1; the Greater Salinas Area Plan Land Use Plan (Figure 13), Policy Nos. 26.1.4.1, 39.1.4.1, 40.1.1.1, Part II Chapter V defining commercial land use designations in the Area Plan; and amending certain guidelines in the Rancho San Juan Area of Development Concentration (ADC) Development Guidelines and Principles adopted pursuant to Policy 26.1.4.1, be adopted by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7421, "fingerprint": "2007|200700102|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700102|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "cda7222ce65188eb", "measure_id": "200700102", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city councilmembers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 389, "no_votes": 90, "total_votes": 479, "percent_yes": 81.21085594989562, "percent_no": 18.789144050104383, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.390720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.388422", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city councilmembers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7422, "fingerprint": "2007|200700103|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700103|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "01a57afa5409e012", "measure_id": "200700103", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 337, "no_votes": 132, "total_votes": 469, "percent_yes": 71.85501066098081, "percent_no": 28.14498933901919, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.390985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.388615", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7423, "fingerprint": "2007|200700104|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700104|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "07f44e7e4b3e9f34", "measure_id": "200700104", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 167, "no_votes": 297, "total_votes": 464, "percent_yes": 35.991379310344826, "percent_no": 64.00862068965517, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.391286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.388813", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7424, "fingerprint": "2007|200700105|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700105|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "3377660699c827ba", "measure_id": "200700105", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter Article 7 be amended to delete an unenforceable residency provision, and create a requirement that anyone holding elective office be a resident and elector of Pacific Grove for at least thirty (30) days before the date of his or her election or appointment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2918, "no_votes": 695, "total_votes": 3613, "percent_yes": 80.76390810960422, "percent_no": 19.236091890395784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.391552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.389007", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter Article 7 be amended to delete an unenforceable residency provision, and create a requirement that anyone holding elective office be a resident and elector of Pacific Grove for at least thirty (30) days before the date of his or her election or appointment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7425, "fingerprint": "2007|200700106|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700106|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "9d40cfbff9a34254", "measure_id": "200700106", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter Article 9 be amended to require election results to be declared and elected officers installed at the Council's first regular meeting following certification of election results, and to require elected officers to file disclosure statements before they may be seated?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3036, "no_votes": 513, "total_votes": 3549, "percent_yes": 85.54522400676247, "percent_no": 14.454775993237533, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.391817", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.389201", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter Article 9 be amended to require election results to be declared and elected officers installed at the Council's first regular meeting following certification of election results, and to require elected officers to file disclosure statements before they may be seated?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7426, "fingerprint": "2007|200700107|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700107|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d9f1158c58bd5171", "measure_id": "200700107", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter Article 11 be amended to establish how a vacancy in the office of Mayor shall be filled; provide that remaining Council Members shall appoint another Council Member to serve as Mayor for the remaining term; provide that the Mayor Pro Tempore shall become Mayor if the Council fails to fill the Mayoral vacancy; and provide that any resulting vacant Council seat shall be filled as provided by existing law in the Charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2799, "no_votes": 751, "total_votes": 3550, "percent_yes": 78.84507042253522, "percent_no": 21.154929577464785, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.392110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.389395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter Article 11 be amended to establish how a vacancy in the office of Mayor shall be filled; provide that remaining Council Members shall appoint another Council Member to serve as Mayor for the remaining term; provide that the Mayor Pro Tempore shall become Mayor if the Council fails to fill the Mayoral vacancy; and provide that any resulting vacant Council seat shall be filled as provided by existing law in the Charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7427, "fingerprint": "2007|200700108|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700108|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "349f2462749cdda0", "measure_id": "200700108", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter Article 13 be amended to allow the Council, by five (5) affirmative votes, to cancel one of the two regular meetings during a specific month?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2310, "no_votes": 1242, "total_votes": 3552, "percent_yes": 65.03378378378379, "percent_no": 34.96621621621621, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.392405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.389588", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter Article 13 be amended to allow the Council, by five (5) affirmative votes, to cancel one of the two regular meetings during a specific month?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7428, "fingerprint": "2007|200700109|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700109|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c4315fd8e44ea0f0", "measure_id": "200700109", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter Article 45 be amended to delete the requirement that the Charter and ordinances can be enforced only by misdemeanor prosecution with penalties up to $1,000 and/or one year imprisonment, and instead to allow enforcement of the Charter and ordinances by misdemeanor, infraction, civil, or administrative action, and allow penalties to be set by ordinance or by reference to the general laws of the State of California?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2372, "no_votes": 1052, "total_votes": 3424, "percent_yes": 69.27570093457945, "percent_no": 30.724299065420553, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.392691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.389778", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter Article 45 be amended to delete the requirement that the Charter and ordinances can be enforced only by misdemeanor prosecution with penalties up to $1,000 and/or one year imprisonment, and instead to allow enforcement of the Charter and ordinances by misdemeanor, infraction, civil, or administrative action, and allow penalties to be set by ordinance or by reference to the general laws of the State of California?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7429, "fingerprint": "2007|200700110|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700110|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "93be399f48bef5ad", "measure_id": "200700110", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article 46 be added to the City Charter to ensure remaining provisions of the Charter continue to have valid effect in the event any other provision of the Charter is held to be invalid or unenforceable?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2637, "no_votes": 786, "total_votes": 3423, "percent_yes": 77.03768624014022, "percent_no": 22.962313759859782, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.392958", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.389968", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article 46 be added to the City Charter to ensure remaining provisions of the Charter continue to have valid effect in the event any other provision of the Charter is held to be invalid or unenforceable?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7430, "fingerprint": "2007|200700111|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700111|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "ffbf6be0eb4f7cb9", "measure_id": "200700111", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance which deletes, during the period starting on January 1, 2008 and ending on December 31, 2013, the maximum annual business license tax limit of $3,000 set forth in Section 7.04.220 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code, be adopted as a general tax so long as Measures P and Q are also approved by a majority vote in this election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1829, "no_votes": 1973, "total_votes": 3802, "percent_yes": 48.10625986322988, "percent_no": 51.89374013677012, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.393224", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.390161", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance which deletes, during the period starting on January 1, 2008 and ending on December 31, 2013, the maximum annual business license tax limit of $3,000 set forth in Section 7.04.220 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code, be adopted as a general tax so long as Measures P and Q are also approved by a majority vote in this election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7431, "fingerprint": "2007|200700112|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700112|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "572392d762b00089", "measure_id": "200700112", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance which imposes, during the period starting on January 1, 2008 and ending on December 31, 2013, a parcel tax of one-hundred and twenty dollars ($120) per parcel per year (but exempting qualified members of lower income households who own and occupy the property as their principal residence) be adopted as a general tax so long as Measures O and Q are also approved by a majority vote in this election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1632, "no_votes": 2198, "total_votes": 3830, "percent_yes": 42.61096605744125, "percent_no": 57.38903394255875, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.393491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.390355", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance which imposes, during the period starting on January 1, 2008 and ending on December 31, 2013, a parcel tax of one-hundred and twenty dollars ($120) per parcel per year (but exempting qualified members of lower income households who own and occupy the property as their principal residence) be adopted as a general tax so long as Measures O and Q are also approved by a majority vote in this election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7432, "fingerprint": "2007|200700113|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700113|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "0c19e9279ccd2340", "measure_id": "200700113", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance which adds, during the period starting on January 1, 2008 and ending on December 31, 2013, a one half percent (0.5%) sales tax to the existing sales tax pursuant to Chapter 6.08 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code, be adopted as a general tax so long as Measures O and P are also approved by a majority vote in this election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1812, "no_votes": 2004, "total_votes": 3816, "percent_yes": 47.48427672955975, "percent_no": 52.51572327044025, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.393800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.390551", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance which adds, during the period starting on January 1, 2008 and ending on December 31, 2013, a one half percent (0.5%) sales tax to the existing sales tax pursuant to Chapter 6.08 of the Pacific Grove Municipal Code, be adopted as a general tax so long as Measures O and P are also approved by a majority vote in this election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7433, "fingerprint": "2007|200700031|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700031|PLACER", "content_hash": "3826a3cf7c220af9", "measure_id": "200700031", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $115 million in bonds at legal interest rates to construct a comprehensive high school comparable to existing District facilities, acquire land, install infrastructure and fund all related construction, planning and environmental expenses associated therewith?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 12, "percent_yes": 91.66666666666666, "percent_no": 8.333333333333343, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-24", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.394097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.390741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $115 million in bonds at legal interest rates to construct a comprehensive high school comparable to existing District facilities, acquire land, install infrastructure and fund all related construction, planning and environmental expenses associated therewith?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7434, "fingerprint": "2007|200700160|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700160|PLACER", "content_hash": "0c5280db4e8b59c3", "measure_id": "200700160", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Del Paso Heights Elementary School District, the Grant Joint Union High School District, the North Sacramento Elementary School district, and the Rio Linda Elementary School District unify into one new district serving students in kindergarten through grade 12, with a seven-member governing board consisting of one member residing in each of seven trustee areas elected by the registered voters of the entire unified school district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26, "no_votes": 48, "total_votes": 74, "percent_yes": 35.13513513513513, "percent_no": 64.86486486486487, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.394419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.390935", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Del Paso Heights Elementary School District, the Grant Joint Union High School District, the North Sacramento Elementary School district, and the Rio Linda Elementary School District unify into one new district serving students in kindergarten through grade 12, with a seven-member governing board consisting of one member residing in each of seven trustee areas elected by the registered voters of the entire unified school district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7435, "fingerprint": "2007|200700161|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700161|PLACER", "content_hash": "6ff3f551c3f16286", "measure_id": "200700161", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Ophir Elementary School District annex into the Loomis Union School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2507, "no_votes": 1080, "total_votes": 3587, "percent_yes": 69.89127404516309, "percent_no": 30.108725954836913, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.394748", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.391126", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ophir Elementary School District annex into the Loomis Union School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7436, "fingerprint": "2007|200700012|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700012|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ddd36dac4b7eb0eb", "measure_id": "200700012", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the City of Desert Hot Springs return to the original practice of electing five (5) Councilmembers and allowing the Mayor\u2019s position to rotate among the five (5) Councilmembers, beginning with the most senior Councilmember serving as the Mayor first, to become effective at the November 6, 2007, Municipal Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 782, "no_votes": 911, "total_votes": 1693, "percent_yes": 46.19019492025989, "percent_no": 53.80980507974011, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.395024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.391320", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the City of Desert Hot Springs return to the original practice of electing five (5) Councilmembers and allowing the Mayor\u2019s position to rotate among the five (5) Councilmembers, beginning with the most senior Councilmember serving as the Mayor first, to become effective at the November 6, 2007, Municipal Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7438, "fingerprint": "2007|200700115|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700115|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d982b28b8c027cc5", "measure_id": "200700115", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1689, providing a ten year time extension of the term of the Development Agreement between the City of Palm Springs and Shadowrock Real Estate Development, LLC, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4259, "no_votes": 6298, "total_votes": 10557, "percent_yes": 40.34290044520223, "percent_no": 59.65709955479777, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.395624", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.391722", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1689, providing a ten year time extension of the term of the Development Agreement between the City of Palm Springs and Shadowrock Real Estate Development, LLC, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7439, "fingerprint": "2007|200700116|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700116|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "200700116", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 975, "no_votes": 477, "total_votes": 1452, "percent_yes": 67.14876033057851, "percent_no": 32.85123966942149, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.395919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.391913", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7440, "fingerprint": "2007|200700162|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700162|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d675f3bcf7073456", "measure_id": "200700162", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety/security at neighborhood schools; reduce severe overcrowding by constructing/equipping a new high school, including science, computer and vocational technology labs, library; upgrading health, fire safety, security and outdated electrical systems, building or expanding libraries, classrooms, restrooms; improving educational opportunities for students; shall Alvord Unified School District issue $196 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3437, "no_votes": 2105, "total_votes": 5542, "percent_yes": 62.01732226632984, "percent_no": 37.98267773367016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.396196", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.392105", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety/security at neighborhood schools; reduce severe overcrowding by constructing/equipping a new high school, including science, computer and vocational technology labs, library; upgrading health, fire safety, security and outdated electrical systems, building or expanding libraries, classrooms, restrooms; improving educational opportunities for students; shall Alvord Unified School District issue $196 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7441, "fingerprint": "2007|200700163|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700163|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "0335e45f265531a8", "measure_id": "200700163", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall trustee areas be abolished in the Jurupa Unified School District, County of Riverside?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1386, "no_votes": 1687, "total_votes": 3073, "percent_yes": 45.10250569476082, "percent_no": 54.89749430523918, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.396459", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.392302", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall trustee areas be abolished in the Jurupa Unified School District, County of Riverside?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7437, "fingerprint": "2007|200700114|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700114|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "732a9c1762b16862", "measure_id": "200700114", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to provide additional funding for public safety, street and park maintenance, and other services/projects for the residents of Desert Hot Springs, shall the City's tax on hotel occupancies (\"Bed Tax\"), collected by hotels from tourists, visitors to the City and all hotel guests, be increased by 2%, from 10% to 12% of the daily room charge?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1388, "no_votes": 724, "total_votes": 2112, "percent_yes": 65.71969696969697, "percent_no": 34.28030303030303, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.395329", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.391525", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide additional funding for public safety, street and park maintenance, and other services/projects for the residents of Desert Hot Springs, shall the City's tax on hotel occupancies (\"Bed Tax\"), collected by hotels from tourists, visitors to the City and all hotel guests, be increased by 2%, from 10% to 12% of the daily room charge?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7443, "fingerprint": "2007|200700164|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700164|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "0c5280db4e8b59c3", "measure_id": "200700164", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Del Paso Heights Elementary School District, the Grant Joint Union High School District, the North Sacramento Elementary School District, and the Rio Linda Elementary School District unify into one new district serving students in kindergarten through grade 12, with a seven-member governing board consisting of one member residing in each of seven trustee areas elected by the registered voters of the entire unified school district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6678, "no_votes": 4358, "total_votes": 11036, "percent_yes": 60.51105472997463, "percent_no": 39.48894527002537, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.397020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.392685", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Del Paso Heights Elementary School District, the Grant Joint Union High School District, the North Sacramento Elementary School District, and the Rio Linda Elementary School District unify into one new district serving students in kindergarten through grade 12, with a seven-member governing board consisting of one member residing in each of seven trustee areas elected by the registered voters of the entire unified school district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7442, "fingerprint": "2007|200700017|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700017|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "89fc1ff034407b23", "measure_id": "200700017", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify for state funding and developer fees, construct elementary, middle, and high schools, libraries, computer labs, support facilities, acquire land, and purchase equipment and computer technology, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue $750 million in bonds at legal interest rates and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to monitor expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60, "no_votes": 14, "total_votes": 74, "percent_yes": 81.08108108108108, "percent_no": 18.91891891891892, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-27", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.396724", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.392493", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify for state funding and developer fees, construct elementary, middle, and high schools, libraries, computer labs, support facilities, acquire land, and purchase equipment and computer technology, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue $750 million in bonds at legal interest rates and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to monitor expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7444, "fingerprint": "2007|200700117|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700117|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "910ee2769b419f58", "measure_id": "200700117", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address an existing emergency related to Hollister\u2019s ability to fund general city services, including anti-gang programs, police and fire services, graffiti removal, parks, and street improvements, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy a sales tax of one per cent, which will automatically expire five years after its operative date and will require an annual public report on revenues and expenditures from an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2744, "no_votes": 1416, "total_votes": 4160, "percent_yes": 65.96153846153847, "percent_no": 34.03846153846153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.397295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.392876", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address an existing emergency related to Hollister\u2019s ability to fund general city services, including anti-gang programs, police and fire services, graffiti removal, parks, and street improvements, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy a sales tax of one per cent, which will automatically expire five years after its operative date and will require an annual public report on revenues and expenditures from an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7446, "fingerprint": "2007|200700119|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700119|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b7d31e1bb0d05afd", "measure_id": "200700119", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use of 17.68 acres of vacant land (Zone A on Diagram) from General Commercial to Residential Planned Development-RD8 for a maximum of 84 single family dwelling units and of 3.72 acres of vacant land (Zone C on Diagram) from General Commercial to Residential Planned Development-RD20 for a maximum of 72 senior citizen dwelling units?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2064, "no_votes": 1072, "total_votes": 3136, "percent_yes": 65.81632653061224, "percent_no": 34.183673469387756, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.397937", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.393270", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use of 17.68 acres of vacant land (Zone A on Diagram) from General Commercial to Residential Planned Development-RD8 for a maximum of 84 single family dwelling units and of 3.72 acres of vacant land (Zone C on Diagram) from General Commercial to Residential Planned Development-RD20 for a maximum of 72 senior citizen dwelling units?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7448, "fingerprint": "2007|200700121|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700121|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4972546833c3711e", "measure_id": "200700121", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1407 be adopted to clarify and extend the City\u2019s existing utility users tax, at its existing rate, to fund such City general fund programs as police and fire protection, street maintenance, and park and recreation services, to authorize tax exemptions for low-income and senior-citizen households, extend its sunset provision for five years to June 30, 2013 and to require voter approval of any increase in the tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2893, "no_votes": 1647, "total_votes": 4540, "percent_yes": 63.72246696035242, "percent_no": 36.27753303964758, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.398485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.393663", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1407 be adopted to clarify and extend the City\u2019s existing utility users tax, at its existing rate, to fund such City general fund programs as police and fire protection, street maintenance, and park and recreation services, to authorize tax exemptions for low-income and senior-citizen households, extend its sunset provision for five years to June 30, 2013 and to require voter approval of any increase in the tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7447, "fingerprint": "2007|200700120|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700120|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4eebb8118dce469e", "measure_id": "200700120", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2664 be adopted to establish a business license tax initially in the amount of three and one-half cents per square foot of gross floor area, an annual adjustment by the consumer price index, but not to exceed five cents per square foot for distribution center businesses located within the City for the purpose of raising revenue to defray the costs of providing City services and supplement the City\u2019s General Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6694, "no_votes": 2774, "total_votes": 9468, "percent_yes": 70.7013096746937, "percent_no": 29.298690325306296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.398210", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.393460", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2664 be adopted to establish a business license tax initially in the amount of three and one-half cents per square foot of gross floor area, an annual adjustment by the consumer price index, but not to exceed five cents per square foot for distribution center businesses located within the City for the purpose of raising revenue to defray the costs of providing City services and supplement the City\u2019s General Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7445, "fingerprint": "2007|200700118|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700118|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "76ea94f479766928", "measure_id": "200700118", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to affirm that the City Council of the City of Adelanto is authorized to adopt and amend its General Plan and Land Use/Zoning Map in the manner set forth in the State Planning and Zoning Law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 428, "no_votes": 240, "total_votes": 668, "percent_yes": 64.07185628742515, "percent_no": 35.92814371257485, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.397639", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.393078", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to affirm that the City Council of the City of Adelanto is authorized to adopt and amend its General Plan and Land Use/Zoning Map in the manner set forth in the State Planning and Zoning Law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7449, "fingerprint": "2007|200700165|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700165|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "9be63feb428246f4", "measure_id": "200700165", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and upgrade existing schools including roof repairs, science labs, libraries, and energy efficient windows, make health and safety improvements including removing asbestos; update electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; improve playgrounds and playfields, and qualify the District for approximately $1,200,000 in State grants, shall Muroc Joint Unified School District issue $14,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent oversight, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 6, "percent_yes": 50.0, "percent_no": 50.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.398754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.393864", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, renovate and upgrade existing schools including roof repairs, science labs, libraries, and energy efficient windows, make health and safety improvements including removing asbestos; update electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology; improve playgrounds and playfields, and qualify the District for approximately $1,200,000 in State grants, shall Muroc Joint Unified School District issue $14,800,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent oversight, and no money for teacher or administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7452, "fingerprint": "2007|200700174|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700174|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "df270819a41bd745", "measure_id": "200700174", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Jerry Johnson be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the Potrero Community Planning Group?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 203, "no_votes": 95, "total_votes": 298, "percent_yes": 68.12080536912751, "percent_no": 31.87919463087249, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-12-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.399635", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.394442", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jerry Johnson be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the Potrero Community Planning Group?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7453, "fingerprint": "2007|200700175|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700175|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f1847158ee2e46be", "measure_id": "200700175", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Mary Johnson be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the Potrero Community Planning Group?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 206, "no_votes": 91, "total_votes": 297, "percent_yes": 69.36026936026936, "percent_no": 30.639730639730644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-12-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.399896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.394634", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Mary Johnson be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the Potrero Community Planning Group?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7454, "fingerprint": "2007|200700176|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700176|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a763c8a028a8b162", "measure_id": "200700176", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Gordon Hammers be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the Potrero Community Planning Group?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 214, "no_votes": 84, "total_votes": 298, "percent_yes": 71.81208053691275, "percent_no": 28.187919463087255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-12-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.400237", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.394824", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Gordon Hammers be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the Potrero Community Planning Group?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7455, "fingerprint": "2007|200700177|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700177|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "fd2293e3c9f5f224", "measure_id": "200700177", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Janet Wright be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the Potrero Community Planning Group?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 202, "no_votes": 96, "total_votes": 298, "percent_yes": 67.78523489932886, "percent_no": 32.214765100671144, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-12-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.400501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.395014", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Janet Wright be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the Potrero Community Planning Group?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7456, "fingerprint": "2007|200700178|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700178|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "121eb410b85b6b26", "measure_id": "200700178", "measure_letter": "5", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Thell Fowler be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the Potrero Community Planning Group?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 189, "no_votes": 109, "total_votes": 298, "percent_yes": 63.42281879194631, "percent_no": 36.57718120805369, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-12-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.400763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.395203", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Thell Fowler be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the Potrero Community Planning Group?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7450, "fingerprint": "2007|200700013|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700013|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "52950b54aac4f2ad", "measure_id": "200700013", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 357, also known as the \"Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance,\" to establish reduced bulk and scale residential zoning requirements for six specific neighborhoods in the city located west of Interstate 5 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1978, "no_votes": 1911, "total_votes": 3889, "percent_yes": 50.861403959886864, "percent_no": 49.138596040113136, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.399070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.394060", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 357, also known as the \"Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance,\" to establish reduced bulk and scale residential zoning requirements for six specific neighborhoods in the city located west of Interstate 5 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7451, "fingerprint": "2007|200700058|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700058|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7d95b1db470d5ccc", "measure_id": "200700058", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed City Charter of the City of Vista be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4593, "no_votes": 2225, "total_votes": 6818, "percent_yes": 67.3657964212379, "percent_no": 32.6342035787621, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.399369", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.394252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed City Charter of the City of Vista be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7457, "fingerprint": "2007|200700076|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700076|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "db92a171e39b6873", "measure_id": "200700076", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Municipal Transportation Agency be provided greater governing authority, and additional funding, and be required to develop a Climate Action Plan, and shall the City not increase the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for new private development projects unless approved by a super-majority of the Board?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80786, "no_votes": 64346, "total_votes": 145132, "percent_yes": 55.66380949756085, "percent_no": 44.33619050243915, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.401026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.395398", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Municipal Transportation Agency be provided greater governing authority, and additional funding, and be required to develop a Climate Action Plan, and shall the City not increase the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for new private development projects unless approved by a super-majority of the Board?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7458, "fingerprint": "2007|200700077|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700077|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ef7f777a5c976ff4", "measure_id": "200700077", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall members of Charter-created boards and commissions be prohibited from serving as hold-overs for more than 60 days after their term expires?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 96034, "no_votes": 38915, "total_votes": 134949, "percent_yes": 71.16318016435838, "percent_no": 28.83681983564162, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.401367", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.395624", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of Charter-created boards and commissions be prohibited from serving as hold-overs for more than 60 days after their term expires?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7459, "fingerprint": "2007|200700078|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700078|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "abf5ff9bc95af243", "measure_id": "200700078", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Mayor or four or more members of the Board of Supervisors who wish to place a measure on the ballot first be required to submit it to the Board of Supervisors for a public hearing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 94939, "no_votes": 44258, "total_votes": 139197, "percent_yes": 68.20477452818668, "percent_no": 31.795225471813325, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.401652", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.395838", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mayor or four or more members of the Board of Supervisors who wish to place a measure on the ballot first be required to submit it to the Board of Supervisors for a public hearing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7460, "fingerprint": "2007|200700079|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700079|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "7715ed8bc0d8c1df", "measure_id": "200700079", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Library Preservation Fund be renewed and its purpose expanded so that the Fund can be used to repay debt issued by the City to construct and improve library facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 105328, "no_votes": 36102, "total_votes": 141430, "percent_yes": 74.4735911758467, "percent_no": 25.526408824153293, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.401919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.396027", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Library Preservation Fund be renewed and its purpose expanded so that the Fund can be used to repay debt issued by the City to construct and improve library facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7461, "fingerprint": "2007|200700080|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700080|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "5fe7f5ac6a5c1367", "measure_id": "200700080", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Mayor be required to appear in person at one regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors each month to engage in formal policy discussions with members of the Board?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 70166, "no_votes": 74253, "total_votes": 144419, "percent_yes": 48.58501997659588, "percent_no": 51.41498002340412, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.402184", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.396221", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mayor be required to appear in person at one regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors each month to engage in formal policy discussions with members of the Board?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7462, "fingerprint": "2007|200700081|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700081|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "c745f9d94fa43ad5", "measure_id": "200700081", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors be granted the authority to amend the City's contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) to allow police department employees who served as airport police officers before December 27, 1997 to end their participation in CalPERS and move their service credit to the San Francisco Employees' Retirement System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 69637, "no_votes": 65321, "total_votes": 134958, "percent_yes": 51.5990159901599, "percent_no": 48.4009840098401, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.402451", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.396413", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors be granted the authority to amend the City's contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) to allow police department employees who served as airport police officers before December 27, 1997 to end their participation in CalPERS and move their service credit to the San Francisco Employees' Retirement System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7463, "fingerprint": "2007|200700082|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700082|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a469b8f8efa45d8c", "measure_id": "200700082", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City establish a Golden Gate Park Stables Matching Fund to be used for renovation, repair and maintenance of the Golden Gate Park stables and provide up to $750,000 in matching City revenues toward this Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 77340, "no_votes": 62331, "total_votes": 139671, "percent_yes": 55.372983654445086, "percent_no": 44.627016345554914, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.402817", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.396604", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City establish a Golden Gate Park Stables Matching Fund to be used for renovation, repair and maintenance of the Golden Gate Park stables and provide up to $750,000 in matching City revenues toward this Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7464, "fingerprint": "2007|200700083|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700083|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ee49883e1acd6455", "measure_id": "200700083", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Planning Code be changed to increase the number of parking spaces that\r\ndevelopers are permitted to build and ease restrictions on building new parking spaces for residential and non-residential buildings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46632, "no_votes": 94277, "total_votes": 140909, "percent_yes": 33.093698770128235, "percent_no": 66.90630122987176, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.403087", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.396796", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Planning Code be changed to increase the number of parking spaces that\r\ndevelopers are permitted to build and ease restrictions on building new parking spaces for residential and non-residential buildings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7465, "fingerprint": "2007|200700084|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700084|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "455db673dd4ff861", "measure_id": "200700084", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City establish the Office of Small Business as a City department, require it to operate a Small Business Assistance Center, providing a central source of information for small businesses, and allocate $750,000 for its first year of operations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80865, "no_votes": 55855, "total_votes": 136720, "percent_yes": 59.146430661205386, "percent_no": 40.853569338794614, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.403360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.396983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City establish the Office of Small Business as a City department, require it to operate a Small Business Assistance Center, providing a central source of information for small businesses, and allocate $750,000 for its first year of operations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7466, "fingerprint": "2007|200700085|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700085|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "924e1ad499aa0c84", "measure_id": "200700085", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy that the City should, through an agreement with a private\r\nprovider, offer free wireless high-speed Internet access as quickly as possible on an\r\nequal basis to all parts of San Francisco?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86451, "no_votes": 52428, "total_votes": 138879, "percent_yes": 62.24915213963234, "percent_no": 37.75084786036766, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.403629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.397171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy that the City should, through an agreement with a private\r\nprovider, offer free wireless high-speed Internet access as quickly as possible on an\r\nequal basis to all parts of San Francisco?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7467, "fingerprint": "2007|200700086|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700086|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b0e1b1ea2761e807", "measure_id": "200700086", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy that the City should not increase the number of general advertising signs on street furniture and City-owned buildings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86250, "no_votes": 53195, "total_votes": 139445, "percent_yes": 61.8523432177561, "percent_no": 38.1476567822439, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.403899", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.397359", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy that the City should not increase the number of general advertising signs on street furniture and City-owned buildings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7468, "fingerprint": "2007|200700087|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700087|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c49cfd16e4f57700", "measure_id": "200700087", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Mountain House Community Services District have an elected board of directors with the members of the board of directors being elected at-large?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 286, "no_votes": 15, "total_votes": 301, "percent_yes": 95.01661129568106, "percent_no": 4.983388704318941, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.404163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.397552", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mountain House Community Services District have an elected board of directors with the members of the board of directors being elected at-large?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7477, "fingerprint": "2007|200700166|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700166|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b049ada17d1cc037", "measure_id": "200700166", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Burlingame Schools Safety and Repair Measure: To maintain excellent local schools, fix leaky, deteriorated roofs, improve fire safety, repair and upgrade classrooms, heating/ventilation systems for energy efficiency, and update science, computer and instructional technology, shall Burlingame Elementary School District issue $48.3 million of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3650, "no_votes": 2062, "total_votes": 5712, "percent_yes": 63.90056022408963, "percent_no": 36.09943977591037, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.406774", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.399305", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Burlingame Schools Safety and Repair Measure: To maintain excellent local schools, fix leaky, deteriorated roofs, improve fire safety, repair and upgrade classrooms, heating/ventilation systems for energy efficiency, and update science, computer and instructional technology, shall Burlingame Elementary School District issue $48.3 million of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizens\u2019 oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7475, "fingerprint": "2007|200700125|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700125|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9307db84d1187ae8", "measure_id": "200700125", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide needed funding for general city services, including police, fire, street and park maintenance, and library programs, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the annual business license tax for most business types, resulting in a $10 per employee annual increase for most businesses, and automatically adjusting all business license tax rates annually for inflation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4865, "no_votes": 1800, "total_votes": 6665, "percent_yes": 72.99324831207802, "percent_no": 27.006751687921977, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.406230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.398926", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide needed funding for general city services, including police, fire, street and park maintenance, and library programs, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the annual business license tax for most business types, resulting in a $10 per employee annual increase for most businesses, and automatically adjusting all business license tax rates annually for inflation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7476, "fingerprint": "2007|200700126|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700126|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f0ddb96dda042557", "measure_id": "200700126", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing an eight percent tax on commercial parking that would be imposed only as an alternative to the existing eight percent business license tax on commercial parking facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4205, "no_votes": 2420, "total_votes": 6625, "percent_yes": 63.471698113207545, "percent_no": 36.528301886792455, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.406500", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.399116", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing an eight percent tax on commercial parking that would be imposed only as an alternative to the existing eight percent business license tax on commercial parking facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7472, "fingerprint": "2007|200700122|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700122|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7121519ca65210f1", "measure_id": "200700122", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2316 be adopted to reduce the rate of Redwood City\u2019s utility users\u2019 tax on telecommunication and video services from 5% to 4%; to modernize the telecommunication and video service definitions so that taxpayers are treated the same regardless of technology used; which tax has been used to maintain the city\u2019s storm drain system, repair broken sidewalks and repave city streets with all expenditures subject to annual audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5738, "no_votes": 1438, "total_votes": 7176, "percent_yes": 79.96098104793758, "percent_no": 20.03901895206242, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.405360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.398328", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2316 be adopted to reduce the rate of Redwood City\u2019s utility users\u2019 tax on telecommunication and video services from 5% to 4%; to modernize the telecommunication and video service definitions so that taxpayers are treated the same regardless of technology used; which tax has been used to maintain the city\u2019s storm drain system, repair broken sidewalks and repave city streets with all expenditures subject to annual audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7473, "fingerprint": "2007|200700123|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700123|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "530fa973f4a82e87", "measure_id": "200700123", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall specified sections of the City Charter be amended to extend the term of office of planning commissioner and library board member from three (3) years to four (4) years and to reduce the term of office of port members from five (5) years to four (4) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5807, "no_votes": 1355, "total_votes": 7162, "percent_yes": 81.08070371404635, "percent_no": 18.91929628595365, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.405629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.398529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall specified sections of the City Charter be amended to extend the term of office of planning commissioner and library board member from three (3) years to four (4) years and to reduce the term of office of port members from five (5) years to four (4) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7474, "fingerprint": "2007|200700124|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700124|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c569414968c82465", "measure_id": "200700124", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To enhance public services and city facilities\u2014such as maintaining police, fire, paramedic, and disaster preparedness; building a new public library with disabled access and space for children\u2019s programs; and maintaining and improving streets and sidewalks, recreational facilities, and senior programs\u2014and for other general city purposes, shall the City of San Bruno be authorized to enact a half-cent sales tax, with all proceeds placed in the City\u2019s general fund, and with an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2570, "no_votes": 2667, "total_votes": 5237, "percent_yes": 49.07389726942906, "percent_no": 50.92610273057094, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.405903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.398724", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance public services and city facilities\u2014such as maintaining police, fire, paramedic, and disaster preparedness; building a new public library with disabled access and space for children\u2019s programs; and maintaining and improving streets and sidewalks, recreational facilities, and senior programs\u2014and for other general city purposes, shall the City of San Bruno be authorized to enact a half-cent sales tax, with all proceeds placed in the City\u2019s general fund, and with an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7469, "fingerprint": "2007|200700016|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700016|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "311390c9776e2abb", "measure_id": "200700016", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain educational excellence and high academic standards, keep class sizes small, improve reading and writing, offer music, art and language classes, provide students access to computers, maintain science, math and technology classes, other classroom needs, and attract/retain high quality teachers, shall the Las Lomitas Elementary School District replace and increase the current parcel tax by $115 ($196 to $311) beginning July 1, 2007, with exemptions for residents 65 and older and with public accountability measures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2340, "no_votes": 756, "total_votes": 3096, "percent_yes": 75.5813953488372, "percent_no": 24.418604651162795, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.404470", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.397741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain educational excellence and high academic standards, keep class sizes small, improve reading and writing, offer music, art and language classes, provide students access to computers, maintain science, math and technology classes, other classroom needs, and attract/retain high quality teachers, shall the Las Lomitas Elementary School District replace and increase the current parcel tax by $115 ($196 to $311) beginning July 1, 2007, with exemptions for residents 65 and older and with public accountability measures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7471, "fingerprint": "2007|200700046|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700046|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "54b580546acb7143", "measure_id": "200700046", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To implement a community commitment to quality education by attracting and retaining experienced and high quality teaching and support staff, improving teacher training in academic subjects, enhancing library services, and preventing additional cutbacks in instructional programs, shall the Pacifica School District levy a special tax at the rate of $96/year per parcel beginning July 1, 2007, for a period of five years, with an exemption for primary residence available to individuals aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4024, "no_votes": 2857, "total_votes": 6881, "percent_yes": 58.47987211161168, "percent_no": 41.52012788838832, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.405086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.398138", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To implement a community commitment to quality education by attracting and retaining experienced and high quality teaching and support staff, improving teacher training in academic subjects, enhancing library services, and preventing additional cutbacks in instructional programs, shall the Pacifica School District levy a special tax at the rate of $96/year per parcel beginning July 1, 2007, for a period of five years, with an exemption for primary residence available to individuals aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7470, "fingerprint": "2007|200700045|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700045|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7eb47edc537b22af", "measure_id": "200700045", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "With a full tax exemption available to senior citizens, and to ensure that the children of Millbrae receive a quality education and have safe and healthy classrooms, shall the Millbrae Elementary School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of seventy-eight dollars per taxable parcel, limited to five years, to provide funds to reinstate custodians, maintenance personnel, librarians, music instruction, and technology and instructional aides, and support the District\u2019s high quality academic programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2743, "no_votes": 1514, "total_votes": 4257, "percent_yes": 64.4350481559784, "percent_no": 35.56495184402161, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.404816", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.397936", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "With a full tax exemption available to senior citizens, and to ensure that the children of Millbrae receive a quality education and have safe and healthy classrooms, shall the Millbrae Elementary School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of seventy-eight dollars per taxable parcel, limited to five years, to provide funds to reinstate custodians, maintenance personnel, librarians, music instruction, and technology and instructional aides, and support the District\u2019s high quality academic programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7478, "fingerprint": "2007|200700127|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700127|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "f24d25d282d22f1a", "measure_id": "200700127", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended by amending Charter Section 1300 and adding a new charter section 1300.1 to provide for regular City elections in November even-numbered years instead of odd-numbered years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6729, "no_votes": 8447, "total_votes": 15176, "percent_yes": 44.33974696889826, "percent_no": 55.66025303110174, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.407043", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.399509", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended by amending Charter Section 1300 and adding a new charter section 1300.1 to provide for regular City elections in November even-numbered years instead of odd-numbered years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7479, "fingerprint": "2007|200700128|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700128|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9a75e1762c6fa20f", "measure_id": "200700128", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to reduce the rate of the City of Gilroy\u2019s Communications Users\u2019 Tax from 5% to 4.5%; to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Utility Users\u2019 Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law; and to ratify and approve the past collection of the Tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3578, "no_votes": 2095, "total_votes": 5673, "percent_yes": 63.07068570421293, "percent_no": 36.92931429578707, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.407348", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.399702", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to reduce the rate of the City of Gilroy\u2019s Communications Users\u2019 Tax from 5% to 4.5%; to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Utility Users\u2019 Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law; and to ratify and approve the past collection of the Tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7483, "fingerprint": "2007|200700132|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700132|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3bf488f123bcb9cd", "measure_id": "200700132", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To upgrade and expand Sunnyvale Library to support enhanced educational opportunities for local children and students, to support an increase of the library\u2019s collection of books and other materials, to ensure adequate reading space and expanded computer labs for seniors, children and the general public, shall the City of Sunnyvale issue $108 million in general obligation bonds for design and construction of a new, energy efficient, green-designed, environmentally sustainable library to support Sunnyvale\u2019s growing community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9917, "no_votes": 6858, "total_votes": 16775, "percent_yes": 59.117734724292106, "percent_no": 40.882265275707894, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.408523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.400491", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and expand Sunnyvale Library to support enhanced educational opportunities for local children and students, to support an increase of the library\u2019s collection of books and other materials, to ensure adequate reading space and expanded computer labs for seniors, children and the general public, shall the City of Sunnyvale issue $108 million in general obligation bonds for design and construction of a new, energy efficient, green-designed, environmentally sustainable library to support Sunnyvale\u2019s growing community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7484, "fingerprint": "2007|200700133|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700133|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f6d677ccd5112bcc", "measure_id": "200700133", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Section 602 be amended to limit a Councilmember to serving eight years in any twelve-year period, not including appointment to an unexpired term of less than two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12570, "no_votes": 3485, "total_votes": 16055, "percent_yes": 78.29336655247586, "percent_no": 21.70663344752414, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.408792", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.400693", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Section 602 be amended to limit a Councilmember to serving eight years in any twelve-year period, not including appointment to an unexpired term of less than two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7485, "fingerprint": "2007|200700134|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700134|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b83983914d7d129b", "measure_id": "200700134", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Sections 1002 and 1003 be amended to clarify that a board or commission member can serve two terms on the same board or commission without a break, can serve on a different board or commission prior to expiration of his/her term with Council approval, and to clarify members of all boards and commissions may serve two successive terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11078, "no_votes": 4788, "total_votes": 15866, "percent_yes": 69.82226143955629, "percent_no": 30.177738560443714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.409058", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.400883", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Sections 1002 and 1003 be amended to clarify that a board or commission member can serve two terms on the same board or commission without a break, can serve on a different board or commission prior to expiration of his/her term with Council approval, and to clarify members of all boards and commissions may serve two successive terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7486, "fingerprint": "2007|200700135|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700135|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "53b1ed016e71c645", "measure_id": "200700135", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Section 1007 be amended to add a provision that if two employee-nominated members of the Personnel Board are not nominated and elected within six months of a vacancy then the City Council may fill the vacancies by direct appointment and delete the prohibition against officers in any local, state or national partisan political organization from serving on the Personnel Board?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9374, "no_votes": 5973, "total_votes": 15347, "percent_yes": 61.080341434808105, "percent_no": 38.919658565191895, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.409323", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.401071", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Section 1007 be amended to add a provision that if two employee-nominated members of the Personnel Board are not nominated and elected within six months of a vacancy then the City Council may fill the vacancies by direct appointment and delete the prohibition against officers in any local, state or national partisan political organization from serving on the Personnel Board?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7487, "fingerprint": "2007|200700136|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700136|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "aad516d82ab217f9", "measure_id": "200700136", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Sections 802, 1012 and 1014 be amended to add new language that provides for budget review and recommendations by all boards and commissions and to delete the budget review provisions limited to only the Library Board and Parks and Recreation Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12084, "no_votes": 3371, "total_votes": 15455, "percent_yes": 78.18828857974765, "percent_no": 21.81171142025235, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.409589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.401261", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Sections 802, 1012 and 1014 be amended to add new language that provides for budget review and recommendations by all boards and commissions and to delete the budget review provisions limited to only the Library Board and Parks and Recreation Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7488, "fingerprint": "2007|200700137|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700137|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "56f5bce966531f20", "measure_id": "200700137", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Section 603 be amended to allow the City Council to permit, by resolution, additional excused leave beyond the four personal leave days currently permitted, and to determine whether any additional excused leave days will be paid or unpaid leave?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7472, "no_votes": 8168, "total_votes": 15640, "percent_yes": 47.77493606138107, "percent_no": 52.22506393861893, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.409926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.401457", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Section 603 be amended to allow the City Council to permit, by resolution, additional excused leave beyond the four personal leave days currently permitted, and to determine whether any additional excused leave days will be paid or unpaid leave?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7489, "fingerprint": "2007|200700138|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700138|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3c1e5609c6d82e79", "measure_id": "200700138", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Sections 605 and 606 be amended to select the Mayor and Vice Mayor at the first regular meeting in January and to change the term of the mayor from one year to two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11237, "no_votes": 4512, "total_votes": 15749, "percent_yes": 71.35056194044066, "percent_no": 28.649438059559344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.410192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.401654", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Sections 605 and 606 be amended to select the Mayor and Vice Mayor at the first regular meeting in January and to change the term of the mayor from one year to two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7490, "fingerprint": "2007|200700139|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700139|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9a45362a58888bf0", "measure_id": "200700139", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Section 800 be amended to add language that strongly encourages the City Manager to reside in the City of Sunnyvale and to remove the City Manager residency requirement that is in conflict with the State Constitution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12165, "no_votes": 3603, "total_votes": 15768, "percent_yes": 77.14992389649925, "percent_no": 22.850076103500754, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.410470", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.401844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Section 800 be amended to add language that strongly encourages the City Manager to reside in the City of Sunnyvale and to remove the City Manager residency requirement that is in conflict with the State Constitution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7491, "fingerprint": "2007|200700140|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700140|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1e5ba3f8199197ba", "measure_id": "200700140", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Sections 1302 and 1305 be amended to add language that requires the annual submission of a ten-year balanced budget that includes level of service information, historical financial trend data, and charts for ease of understanding the budget and provides that approved appropriations for capital improvement projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year, unless completed, closed out or Council takes action to modify?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12596, "no_votes": 2749, "total_votes": 15345, "percent_yes": 82.08536982730531, "percent_no": 17.914630172694686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.410851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.402036", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Sections 1302 and 1305 be amended to add language that requires the annual submission of a ten-year balanced budget that includes level of service information, historical financial trend data, and charts for ease of understanding the budget and provides that approved appropriations for capital improvement projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year, unless completed, closed out or Council takes action to modify?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7492, "fingerprint": "2007|200700141|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700141|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1544e272c351000d", "measure_id": "200700141", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Sections 601, 610, 612, 613, 703 and 708 be amended to delete outdated material, to provide for certification of election results at the first meeting in January, to reflect current practice of study sessions and closed sessions in locations other than Council Chambers, to certify election returns, to provide for sanctions for disorderly conduct, to clarify the City Clerk reports to the City Manager, and to allow for publication on the Internet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12280, "no_votes": 3017, "total_votes": 15297, "percent_yes": 80.27717853173824, "percent_no": 19.722821468261756, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.411130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.402228", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Sections 601, 610, 612, 613, 703 and 708 be amended to delete outdated material, to provide for certification of election results at the first meeting in January, to reflect current practice of study sessions and closed sessions in locations other than Council Chambers, to certify election returns, to provide for sanctions for disorderly conduct, to clarify the City Clerk reports to the City Manager, and to allow for publication on the Internet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7493, "fingerprint": "2007|200700142|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700142|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "581b039363a495fa", "measure_id": "200700142", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Sections 803, 804, 806, 903, 908 and 1309 be amended to delete outdated material, clarify that a City Manager pro tem is appointed for an absence of more than two weeks, that the City Manager and City Attorney can be removed without cause, that the City Manager appoints the City Clerk, require City Attorney approval for outside counsel, and specify that the lowest bidder for public works contracts must be responsive and responsible?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11600, "no_votes": 3760, "total_votes": 15360, "percent_yes": 75.52083333333334, "percent_no": 24.479166666666657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.411488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.402419", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Sections 803, 804, 806, 903, 908 and 1309 be amended to delete outdated material, clarify that a City Manager pro tem is appointed for an absence of more than two weeks, that the City Manager and City Attorney can be removed without cause, that the City Manager appoints the City Clerk, require City Attorney approval for outside counsel, and specify that the lowest bidder for public works contracts must be responsive and responsible?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7481, "fingerprint": "2007|200700130|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700130|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "bed5728668763446", "measure_id": "200700130", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Palo Alto Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax (commonly called \u201chotel tax\u201d) charged to persons who occupy hotel or motel rooms in the City for 30 days or less from 10% to 12% in order to help maintain the City\u2019s ability to fund basic City services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11253, "no_votes": 2710, "total_votes": 13963, "percent_yes": 80.59156341760367, "percent_no": 19.408436582396334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.407978", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.400096", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Palo Alto Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax (commonly called \u201chotel tax\u201d) charged to persons who occupy hotel or motel rooms in the City for 30 days or less from 10% to 12% in order to help maintain the City\u2019s ability to fund basic City services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7482, "fingerprint": "2007|200700131|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700131|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d0a95f84bbc92cbc", "measure_id": "200700131", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should an area under El Camino Park be used for an underground water storage reservoir and well to supply the City of Palo Alto with water during an emergency, the existing pump station replaced with modern equipment in its same location, and all existing park facilities fully restored upon completion of construction?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12478, "no_votes": 1109, "total_votes": 13587, "percent_yes": 91.8377861190844, "percent_no": 8.162213880915601, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.408248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.400295", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should an area under El Camino Park be used for an underground water storage reservoir and well to supply the City of Palo Alto with water during an emergency, the existing pump station replaced with modern equipment in its same location, and all existing park facilities fully restored upon completion of construction?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7480, "fingerprint": "2007|200700129|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700129|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "171ff6294f12e603", "measure_id": "200700129", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to reduce the rate of the City of Los Altos\u2019s Communications Users\u2019 Tax from 3.5% to 3.2%; to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Utility Users\u2019 Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law; and to ratify and approve the past collection of the Tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5958, "no_votes": 1117, "total_votes": 7075, "percent_yes": 84.21201413427562, "percent_no": 15.78798586572438, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.407701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.399900", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to reduce the rate of the City of Los Altos\u2019s Communications Users\u2019 Tax from 3.5% to 3.2%; to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Utility Users\u2019 Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law; and to ratify and approve the past collection of the Tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7494, "fingerprint": "2007|200700027|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700027|SOLANO", "content_hash": "95e90eda660d28bc", "measure_id": "200700027", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Dixon City Council Resolution No. 06-195, \u201cA Resolution of the Council of the City of Dixon Approving a Proposed Amendment to the Transportation and Circulation Chapter of the City of Dixon General Plan Relating to Levels of Service,\u201d which amends the General Plan Traffic Level of Service Policy to permit a traffic level of service less than \u201cC\u201d in certain circumstances, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2461, "no_votes": 2861, "total_votes": 5322, "percent_yes": 46.24201428034573, "percent_no": 53.75798571965427, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.411763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.402617", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Dixon City Council Resolution No. 06-195, \u201cA Resolution of the Council of the City of Dixon Approving a Proposed Amendment to the Transportation and Circulation Chapter of the City of Dixon General Plan Relating to Levels of Service,\u201d which amends the General Plan Traffic Level of Service Policy to permit a traffic level of service less than \u201cC\u201d in certain circumstances, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7495, "fingerprint": "2007|200700028|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700028|SOLANO", "content_hash": "433a0c5b0248b5e7", "measure_id": "200700028", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Dixon City Council Resolution No. 06-196, \u201cA Resolution of the Council of the City of Dixon Adopting the Revised Northeast Quadrant Specific Plan,\u201d which Resolution amends the Northeast Quadrant Specific Plan to expressly permit the development of the Dixon Downs Horse Racetrack and Entertainment Center Project and makes other modifications to the Northeast Quadrant Specific Plan, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2494, "no_votes": 2838, "total_votes": 5332, "percent_yes": 46.77419354838709, "percent_no": 53.22580645161291, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.412075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.402859", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Dixon City Council Resolution No. 06-196, \u201cA Resolution of the Council of the City of Dixon Adopting the Revised Northeast Quadrant Specific Plan,\u201d which Resolution amends the Northeast Quadrant Specific Plan to expressly permit the development of the Dixon Downs Horse Racetrack and Entertainment Center Project and makes other modifications to the Northeast Quadrant Specific Plan, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7496, "fingerprint": "2007|200700029|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700029|SOLANO", "content_hash": "7a0b170b63a393aa", "measure_id": "200700029", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Dixon City Council Ordinance No. 06-008, which Ordinance amends the zoning of the Dixon Downs Project site so as to expressly permit the development of the Dixon Downs Horse Racetrack and Entertainment Center Project, including a horse racetrack, hotel and conference center, and a regional commercial shopping center, and which Ordinance also approves a PD Plan for the Dixon Downs Project, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2500, "no_votes": 2834, "total_votes": 5334, "percent_yes": 46.86914135733033, "percent_no": 53.13085864266967, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.412345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.403065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Dixon City Council Ordinance No. 06-008, which Ordinance amends the zoning of the Dixon Downs Project site so as to expressly permit the development of the Dixon Downs Horse Racetrack and Entertainment Center Project, including a horse racetrack, hotel and conference center, and a regional commercial shopping center, and which Ordinance also approves a PD Plan for the Dixon Downs Project, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7497, "fingerprint": "2007|200700030|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700030|SOLANO", "content_hash": "47d7c52963b458ef", "measure_id": "200700030", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Dixon City Council Ordinance No. 06-009, \u201cAn Ordinance Approving a Development Agreement Between the City of Dixon and Magna Entertainment Corporation Relative to the Use and Development of Approximately 260 Acres of Property,\u201d which Ordinance approves a Development Agreement for the Dixon Downs Horse Racetrack and Entertainment Center Project, including a horse racetrack, hotel and conference center, and regional commercial shopping center, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2495, "no_votes": 2842, "total_votes": 5337, "percent_yes": 46.74910998688402, "percent_no": 53.25089001311598, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-04-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.412625", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.403261", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Dixon City Council Ordinance No. 06-009, \u201cAn Ordinance Approving a Development Agreement Between the City of Dixon and Magna Entertainment Corporation Relative to the Use and Development of Approximately 260 Acres of Property,\u201d which Ordinance approves a Development Agreement for the Dixon Downs Horse Racetrack and Entertainment Center Project, including a horse racetrack, hotel and conference center, and regional commercial shopping center, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7499, "fingerprint": "2007|200700144|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700144|SOLANO", "content_hash": "4c62d91bb0e38eee", "measure_id": "200700144", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To preserve the funding of essential City services such as police, fire, street and park maintenance, and programs for youth and seniors, shall a resolution be adopted ratifying and approving the existing tax on water operations with no increase in taxes or fees on local residents and reducing the current water rates by two percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6572, "no_votes": 7644, "total_votes": 14216, "percent_yes": 46.22960045019696, "percent_no": 53.77039954980304, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.413301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.403670", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the funding of essential City services such as police, fire, street and park maintenance, and programs for youth and seniors, shall a resolution be adopted ratifying and approving the existing tax on water operations with no increase in taxes or fees on local residents and reducing the current water rates by two percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7500, "fingerprint": "2007|200700145|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700145|SOLANO", "content_hash": "89e138d68f515ac1", "measure_id": "200700145", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted clarifying the types of improvements that can be made at the Rockville Hills Regional Park without voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6492, "no_votes": 7414, "total_votes": 13906, "percent_yes": 46.68488422263771, "percent_no": 53.31511577736229, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.413570", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.403864", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted clarifying the types of improvements that can be made at the Rockville Hills Regional Park without voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7498, "fingerprint": "2007|200700143|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700143|SOLANO", "content_hash": "eb289e70d85c5bc2", "measure_id": "200700143", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the communication users tax to reduce the rate to 3.5% and update the definitions of the items subject to the tax to help preserve Benicia\u2019s essential services such as police, fire, and street maintenance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5398, "no_votes": 2276, "total_votes": 7674, "percent_yes": 70.34141256189731, "percent_no": 29.658587438102685, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.413030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.403464", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the communication users tax to reduce the rate to 3.5% and update the definitions of the items subject to the tax to help preserve Benicia\u2019s essential services such as police, fire, and street maintenance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7502, "fingerprint": "2007|200700048|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700048|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ab7f69ba5beb31da", "measure_id": "200700048", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve funding for important educational programs in grades 7-12, keep school libraries open, maintain music and fine arts programs, maintain reduced class sizes, provide up-to-date computer and technology instruction, and attract and retain qualified and experienced teachers, shall the Petaluma Joint Union High School District continue its existing tax of $50 per parcel without increasing taxes, with an exemption for seniors, and with all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13869, "no_votes": 4413, "total_votes": 18282, "percent_yes": 75.8615031178208, "percent_no": 24.138496882179197, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.414108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.404263", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve funding for important educational programs in grades 7-12, keep school libraries open, maintain music and fine arts programs, maintain reduced class sizes, provide up-to-date computer and technology instruction, and attract and retain qualified and experienced teachers, shall the Petaluma Joint Union High School District continue its existing tax of $50 per parcel without increasing taxes, with an exemption for seniors, and with all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7501, "fingerprint": "2007|200700047|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700047|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e298a5b19f820b05", "measure_id": "200700047", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve funding for important educational programs at elementary schools, keep school libraries open, preserve reading specialists, maintain music and fine arts programs, maintain reduced class size in grades 4-6, provide up-to-date computer and technology instruction, and attract and retain qualified and experienced teachers, shall the Petaluma City Elementary School District continue its existing tax of $75 per parcel without increasing taxes, with an exemption for seniors, and all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6152, "no_votes": 2000, "total_votes": 8152, "percent_yes": 75.46614327772326, "percent_no": 24.533856722276738, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.413840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.404069", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve funding for important educational programs at elementary schools, keep school libraries open, preserve reading specialists, maintain music and fine arts programs, maintain reduced class size in grades 4-6, provide up-to-date computer and technology instruction, and attract and retain qualified and experienced teachers, shall the Petaluma City Elementary School District continue its existing tax of $75 per parcel without increasing taxes, with an exemption for seniors, and all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7503, "fingerprint": "2007|200700167|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700167|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e2b3dda78f6c4108", "measure_id": "200700167", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education for our children and provide accountability to taxpayers, to recruit and retain excellent teachers, keep school libraries open, provide vocational career education programs, increase access to technology, restore cuts necessitated by lack of state funding, require annual audits and prohibit use for administrative salaries, shall the District be authorized to implement a special ninety-one dollar tax per taxable parcel for six years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5777, "no_votes": 4299, "total_votes": 10076, "percent_yes": 57.33425962683605, "percent_no": 42.66574037316395, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.414374", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.404458", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education for our children and provide accountability to taxpayers, to recruit and retain excellent teachers, keep school libraries open, provide vocational career education programs, increase access to technology, restore cuts necessitated by lack of state funding, require annual audits and prohibit use for administrative salaries, shall the District be authorized to implement a special ninety-one dollar tax per taxable parcel for six years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7508, "fingerprint": "2007|200700169|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700169|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "b4458dfcc96896f3", "measure_id": "200700169", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide adequate facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building, six charter school classrooms, two traditional school classrooms, four athletic fields, and additional off street parking, shall the Hart-Ransom Union School district issue bonds in the amount of $3.9 million with interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 388, "no_votes": 268, "total_votes": 656, "percent_yes": 59.14634146341463, "percent_no": 40.85365853658537, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.415811", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.405467", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide adequate facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building, six charter school classrooms, two traditional school classrooms, four athletic fields, and additional off street parking, shall the Hart-Ransom Union School district issue bonds in the amount of $3.9 million with interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7504, "fingerprint": "2007|200700146|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700146|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "c3bda07b13af4b5e", "measure_id": "200700146", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure community safety by hiring/training firefighters and police officers; expanding anti-gang/drug enforcement teams; purchasing emergency rescue equipment for police/firefighters; purchasing radios/computers to reduce 9-1-1 response times; and expanding police patrols around schools/parks; shall the City of Ceres enact a half-cent sales tax with independent citizens' oversight and annual audits, with all funds legally required to stay in Ceres?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2750, "no_votes": 911, "total_votes": 3661, "percent_yes": 75.11608850040973, "percent_no": 24.88391149959027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.414727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.404668", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure community safety by hiring/training firefighters and police officers; expanding anti-gang/drug enforcement teams; purchasing emergency rescue equipment for police/firefighters; purchasing radios/computers to reduce 9-1-1 response times; and expanding police patrols around schools/parks; shall the City of Ceres enact a half-cent sales tax with independent citizens' oversight and annual audits, with all funds legally required to stay in Ceres?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7505, "fingerprint": "2007|200700147|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700147|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "bcd99c8908b972d6", "measure_id": "200700147", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should Modesto change its system of electing City Councilmembers? Please answer the next question, whether you voted \"Yes\" or \"No\" to indicate which election system you prefer if a change is proposed.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10489, "no_votes": 7868, "total_votes": 18357, "percent_yes": 57.138966061992704, "percent_no": 42.861033938007296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.414996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.404873", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should Modesto change its system of electing City Councilmembers? Please answer the next question, whether you voted \"Yes\" or \"No\" to indicate which election system you prefer if a change is proposed.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7506, "fingerprint": "2007|200700148|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700148|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a583435635390195", "measure_id": "200700148", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the City of Modesto were to change its system of electing City Councilmembers, which of the following systems would you prefer?  The Mayor would remain elected by all voters in the City under either option.  (Choose only one):\r\na. \u201cBy District\u201d: Six Districts where candidates must live in the District\r\nthey wish to represent and the voters who live in the District vote on who will\r\nrepresent that District. b. \u201cMixed\u201d: Two At-Large Council seats, where candidates may live anywhere in the City and are voted on by all City voters; and Six Districts\r\nwhere candidates must live in the District they wish to represent, and the\r\nvoters who live in the District vote on who will represent that District.\r\n(Note: \"Yes\" = a. \"By District\" ; \"No\" = b. \"Mixed\")", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10002, "no_votes": 7509, "total_votes": 17511, "percent_yes": 57.11838273085489, "percent_no": 42.88161726914511, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.415273", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.405064", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the City of Modesto were to change its system of electing City Councilmembers, which of the following systems would you prefer?  The Mayor would remain elected by all voters in the City under either option.  (Choose only one):\r\na. \u201cBy District\u201d: Six Districts where candidates must live in the District\r\nthey wish to represent and the voters who live in the District vote on who will\r\nrepresent that District. b. \u201cMixed\u201d: Two At-Large Council seats, where candidates may live anywhere in the City and are voted on by all City voters; and Six Districts\r\nwhere candidates must live in the District they wish to represent, and the\r\nvoters who live in the District vote on who will represent that District.\r\n(Note: \"Yes\" = a. \"By District\" ; \"No\" = b. \"Mixed\")", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7507, "fingerprint": "2007|200700168|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700168|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "285dd7147a18614c", "measure_id": "200700168", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build new classrooms and facilities and improve the overall quality of education, shall the Denair Unified School District be authorized to build a new middle school to reduce student overcrowding, provide the local match for $14,000,000 in State funds, and improve student access to modern technology by issuing $13,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for salaries, administration or overhead?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 812, "no_votes": 478, "total_votes": 1290, "percent_yes": 62.945736434108525, "percent_no": 37.054263565891475, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.415544", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.405274", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build new classrooms and facilities and improve the overall quality of education, shall the Denair Unified School District be authorized to build a new middle school to reduce student overcrowding, provide the local match for $14,000,000 in State funds, and improve student access to modern technology by issuing $13,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for salaries, administration or overhead?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7509, "fingerprint": "2007|200700170|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700170|TRINITY", "content_hash": "67e5129d78006f2a", "measure_id": "200700170", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Approve the resolution by Trinity Union High School District, and Weaverville Elementary School District to become one newly unified school district on July 1, 2008, as requested by both boards on August 10, 2005, as approved by the Trinity County committee on School District Organization on February 2006, after public hearings in all affected districts, and approved by the California State Board of Education on May 9, 2007.  All other feeder elementary school districts within the Trinity Union High School district boundaries, after public hearings, resolved not to be part of the newly unified district, and shall remain intact as separate school districts.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1632, "no_votes": 294, "total_votes": 1926, "percent_yes": 84.73520249221184, "percent_no": 15.26479750778816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.416083", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.405712", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approve the resolution by Trinity Union High School District, and Weaverville Elementary School District to become one newly unified school district on July 1, 2008, as requested by both boards on August 10, 2005, as approved by the Trinity County committee on School District Organization on February 2006, after public hearings in all affected districts, and approved by the California State Board of Education on May 9, 2007.  All other feeder elementary school districts within the Trinity Union High School district boundaries, after public hearings, resolved not to be part of the newly unified district, and shall remain intact as separate school districts.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7510, "fingerprint": "2007|200700059|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700059|TULARE", "content_hash": "f7261a7f82402517", "measure_id": "200700059", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 07-05 be adopted to reduce the rate of the City of Tulare\u2019s Communications Users\u2019 Tax from 7% to 6%; to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Utility Users\u2019 Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law; and to ratify and approve the past collection of the Tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1748, "no_votes": 294, "total_votes": 2042, "percent_yes": 85.60235063663075, "percent_no": 14.397649363369254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.416360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.405952", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 07-05 be adopted to reduce the rate of the City of Tulare\u2019s Communications Users\u2019 Tax from 7% to 6%; to revise the method for calculating and collecting the Utility Users\u2019 Tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state and federal law; and to ratify and approve the past collection of the Tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7511, "fingerprint": "2007|200700043|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700043|VENTURA", "content_hash": "bf012448cadb6cc9", "measure_id": "200700043", "measure_letter": "A7", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Initiative amending the Santa Paula General Plan to generally adjust Santa Paula's City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) to include the Adams Canyon expansion area be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2719, "no_votes": 1724, "total_votes": 4443, "percent_yes": 61.19738915147423, "percent_no": 38.80261084852577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-05-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.416682", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.406151", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Initiative amending the Santa Paula General Plan to generally adjust Santa Paula's City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) to include the Adams Canyon expansion area be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7512, "fingerprint": "2007|200700149|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700149|VENTURA", "content_hash": "fbf415dff1b3529b", "measure_id": "200700149", "measure_letter": "C7", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential city services while decreasing tax rates, shall an ordinance be adopted to comply with new federal requirements and to preserve funding for critical city services, including police and fire protection, paramedic and emergency response, street repair and maintenance, youth services, and reduction of trash and pollution from parks, beaches, and coastal waters, by updating the method for calculating and collecting the communication users\u2019 tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10625, "no_votes": 6143, "total_votes": 16768, "percent_yes": 63.364742366412216, "percent_no": 36.635257633587784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.416989", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.406340", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential city services while decreasing tax rates, shall an ordinance be adopted to comply with new federal requirements and to preserve funding for critical city services, including police and fire protection, paramedic and emergency response, street repair and maintenance, youth services, and reduction of trash and pollution from parks, beaches, and coastal waters, by updating the method for calculating and collecting the communication users\u2019 tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7513, "fingerprint": "2007|200700171|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700171|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e5fa2fd78bf1c4f0", "measure_id": "200700171", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support high academic achievement in science, math, reading, and the arts, provide needed textbooks/instructional materials and student counseling/support services, shall the Las Virgenes Unified School District maintain its expiring school parcel tax of $98/year, without increase, per parcel for eight years with exemptions available for seniors and disabled persons, an independent fiscal oversight committee, with no funds used for administrators\u2019 salaries and every dollar staying in this community to preserve quality education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 158, "no_votes": 48, "total_votes": 206, "percent_yes": 76.69902912621359, "percent_no": 23.30097087378641, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.417266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.406566", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support high academic achievement in science, math, reading, and the arts, provide needed textbooks/instructional materials and student counseling/support services, shall the Las Virgenes Unified School District maintain its expiring school parcel tax of $98/year, without increase, per parcel for eight years with exemptions available for seniors and disabled persons, an independent fiscal oversight committee, with no funds used for administrators\u2019 salaries and every dollar staying in this community to preserve quality education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7514, "fingerprint": "2007|200700172|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700172|YOLO", "content_hash": "2c38ca2b9f802cf3", "measure_id": "200700172", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Davis Joint Unified School District renew a special tax for an additional four years at the annual rate of $100 per dwelling unit for all multidwelling unit parcels and $200 per parcel for all other parcels, providing enhanced reading and mathematics programs; increased instructional program offerings; reduced class size at selected grades; additional nursing, counseling and support services; improved nutrition through fresh farm produce; supplemental staff training; classroom, library, and technology supplemental materials, equipment and services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9463, "no_votes": 3468, "total_votes": 12931, "percent_yes": 73.18072848194261, "percent_no": 26.81927151805739, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.417537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.406790", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Davis Joint Unified School District renew a special tax for an additional four years at the annual rate of $100 per dwelling unit for all multidwelling unit parcels and $200 per parcel for all other parcels, providing enhanced reading and mathematics programs; increased instructional program offerings; reduced class size at selected grades; additional nursing, counseling and support services; improved nutrition through fresh farm produce; supplemental staff training; classroom, library, and technology supplemental materials, equipment and services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7515, "fingerprint": "2007|200700173|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2007|200700173|YOLO", "content_hash": "113b07820e65888e", "measure_id": "200700173", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2007, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide excellent local schools for West Sacramento, modernize campuses, enhance career technical education, add science classrooms, enhance technology, improve school safety, and become eligible for millions in additional State dollars, shall the Washington Unified School District be authorized to issue $59,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit, with annual independent audits and an independent citizens' oversight committee, no bond money for administrative salaries and all funds spent locally on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2343, "no_votes": 2301, "total_votes": 4644, "percent_yes": 50.45219638242894, "percent_no": 49.54780361757106, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2007-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.417803", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.407148", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide excellent local schools for West Sacramento, modernize campuses, enhance career technical education, add science classrooms, enhance technology, improve school safety, and become eligible for millions in additional State dollars, shall the Washington Unified School District be authorized to issue $59,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit, with annual independent audits and an independent citizens' oversight committee, no bond money for administrative salaries and all funds spent locally on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11664, "fingerprint": "2006|200600451|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600451|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9a5edf76b4cc6efc", "measure_id": "200600451", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Berkeley Unified School District Special Educational Programs Enhancement Tax. To support quality public education, shall Berkeley Unified School District replace two special taxes expiring in 2007 with one annual special tax for 10 years at 22.80 cents/square foot for residential buildings, 34.36 cents/square foot for commercial/industrial/institutional buildings and $50 for unimproved parcels with annual cost-of-living adjustments? Funding shall be used for designated purposes including class size reduction, libraries, music, teacher training, and academic support. Independent citizens' committees will monitor this Fund.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33264, "no_votes": 8481, "total_votes": 41745, "percent_yes": 79.68379446640316, "percent_no": 20.316205533596843, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.441799", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.425222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.412227", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Berkeley Unified School District Special Educational Programs Enhancement Tax. To support quality public education, shall Berkeley Unified School District replace two special taxes expiring in 2007 with one annual special tax for 10 years at 22.80 cents/square foot for residential buildings, 34.36 cents/square foot for commercial/industrial/institutional buildings and $50 for unimproved parcels with annual cost-of-living adjustments? Funding shall be used for designated purposes including class size reduction, libraries, music, teacher training, and academic support. Independent citizens' committees will monitor this Fund.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11657, "fingerprint": "2006|200600099|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600099|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a5d273ca523bcccd", "measure_id": "200600099", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Peralta Community College District, which includes Laney and Merritt Colleges in Oakland, Berkeley City College (Vista), and the College of Alameda, issue $390 million of bonds at the lowest legal interest rates to repair, renovate, construct, acquire, and equip classrooms, educational buildings and college campuses so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no funds are used for administrative salaries, and funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97685, "no_votes": 31421, "total_votes": 129106, "percent_yes": 75.66263380478057, "percent_no": 24.33736619521943, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.437771", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.420564", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.409024", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Peralta Community College District, which includes Laney and Merritt Colleges in Oakland, Berkeley City College (Vista), and the College of Alameda, issue $390 million of bonds at the lowest legal interest rates to repair, renovate, construct, acquire, and equip classrooms, educational buildings and college campuses so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no funds are used for administrative salaries, and funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11656, "fingerprint": "2006|200600017|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600017|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a19abbb4c213918d", "measure_id": "200600017", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide quality educational programs for San Leandro students, improve school safety, attract and retain quality teachers and staff, restore custodians and update technology, shall the San Leandro Unified School District be authorized to establish the San Leandro Quality Education Act, a special tax of one-and-two tenths cents ($0.012) per square foot per parcel for six years, beginning July 1, 2006, offering an exemption to citizens 65 years and older, with expenditures monitored by an independent oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5193, "no_votes": 3315, "total_votes": 8508, "percent_yes": 61.03667136812412, "percent_no": 38.96332863187588, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.435656", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.418820", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.407921", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide quality educational programs for San Leandro students, improve school safety, attract and retain quality teachers and staff, restore custodians and update technology, shall the San Leandro Unified School District be authorized to establish the San Leandro Quality Education Act, a special tax of one-and-two tenths cents ($0.012) per square foot per parcel for six years, beginning July 1, 2006, offering an exemption to citizens 65 years and older, with expenditures monitored by an independent oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7516, "fingerprint": "2006|200600005|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600005|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "256356be1c9f738f", "measure_id": "200600005", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall city owned property at 801 Magnolia Avenue be rezoned from single Family Residential to Public Facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3717, "no_votes": 436, "total_votes": 4153, "percent_yes": 89.50156513363834, "percent_no": 10.498434866361663, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.418147", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.407540", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall city owned property at 801 Magnolia Avenue be rezoned from single Family Residential to Public Facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11665, "fingerprint": "2006|200600452|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600452|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9865b46cf2c563a0", "measure_id": "200600452", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to renovate and modernize its schools, upgrade restrooms, electrical, heating and plumbing systems; modernize classrooms; replace aging roofs, improve and expand San Leandro High School classrooms, library and facilities to reduce overcrowding, shall the San Leandro Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, acquire and construct school facilities, acquire school sites, issue $109 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries, and appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11398, "no_votes": 5202, "total_votes": 16600, "percent_yes": 68.66265060240964, "percent_no": 31.33734939759036, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.441997", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.425531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.412414", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to renovate and modernize its schools, upgrade restrooms, electrical, heating and plumbing systems; modernize classrooms; replace aging roofs, improve and expand San Leandro High School classrooms, library and facilities to reduce overcrowding, shall the San Leandro Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, acquire and construct school facilities, acquire school sites, issue $109 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries, and appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7522, "fingerprint": "2006|200600098|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600098|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8bf750f2c1a0ca16", "measure_id": "200600098", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize elementary, middle and high schools and pre-schools, including renovating classrooms, restrooms and other facilities to meet current safety standards, and repairing electrical, plumbing and other building systems; and to build libraries, classrooms, and science and computer labs, shall Oakland Unified School District issue $435 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures, with no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62559, "no_votes": 17672, "total_votes": 80231, "percent_yes": 77.9736012264586, "percent_no": 22.026398773541402, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.420294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.408843", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize elementary, middle and high schools and pre-schools, including renovating classrooms, restrooms and other facilities to meet current safety standards, and repairing electrical, plumbing and other building systems; and to build libraries, classrooms, and science and computer labs, shall Oakland Unified School District issue $435 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures, with no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7523, "fingerprint": "2006|200600258|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600258|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9de4604a7effc321", "measure_id": "200600258", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve Albany's fire safety and emergency response capability by renovating and expanding the Fire Station to better accommodate emergency equipment and personnel; to better serve the community during and after an emergency by constructing an Emergency Operations Center at the Fire/Police complex; and to add sustainable building features to the Fire/Police/Civic Center complex; shall the City issue $5 million in general obligation bonds, with moneys used only for these purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4642, "no_votes": 1438, "total_votes": 6080, "percent_yes": 76.34868421052632, "percent_no": 23.651315789473685, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.421137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.409388", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Albany's fire safety and emergency response capability by renovating and expanding the Fire Station to better accommodate emergency equipment and personnel; to better serve the community during and after an emergency by constructing an Emergency Operations Center at the Fire/Police complex; and to add sustainable building features to the Fire/Police/Civic Center complex; shall the City issue $5 million in general obligation bonds, with moneys used only for these purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7524, "fingerprint": "2006|200600259|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600259|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d6f13a500bdf68e7", "measure_id": "200600259", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you support the establishment of a single medical marijuana dispensary in the City of Albany, to be subject to regulations that the City Council will incorporate into the Municipal Code prior to consideration of any permit for such a dispensary?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3314, "no_votes": 2784, "total_votes": 6098, "percent_yes": 54.34568711052804, "percent_no": 45.65431288947196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.421474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.409573", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you support the establishment of a single medical marijuana dispensary in the City of Albany, to be subject to regulations that the City Council will incorporate into the Municipal Code prior to consideration of any permit for such a dispensary?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11659, "fingerprint": "2006|200600260|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600260|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "99167987b712a3b6", "measure_id": "200600260", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to provide that vacancies in the office of Rent Stabilization Board Commissioner shall be filled at a general municipal election and that in the interim the position shall be filled by the Rent Stabilization Board by appointment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30268, "no_votes": 6607, "total_votes": 36875, "percent_yes": 82.08271186440678, "percent_no": 17.917288135593225, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.438897", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.421761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.409754", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to provide that vacancies in the office of Rent Stabilization Board Commissioner shall be filled at a general municipal election and that in the interim the position shall be filled by the Rent Stabilization Board by appointment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11658, "fingerprint": "2006|200600100|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600100|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6f94866aeaa15a69", "measure_id": "200600100", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize Tracy High School, including replacing aging plumbing, updating electrical and safety systems, renovating and building new classrooms, and to complete Merrill West High School, shall Tracy Joint Unified School District be authorized to pay or reimburse the cost to construct, replace, renovate, equip and furnish school facilities, issue $51,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with no funds for administrator salaries, and appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26, "no_votes": 10, "total_votes": 36, "percent_yes": 72.22222222222221, "percent_no": 27.777777777777786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.438051", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.420832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.409205", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize Tracy High School, including replacing aging plumbing, updating electrical and safety systems, renovating and building new classrooms, and to complete Merrill West High School, shall Tracy Joint Unified School District be authorized to pay or reimburse the cost to construct, replace, renovate, equip and furnish school facilities, issue $51,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with no funds for administrator salaries, and appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7517, "fingerprint": "2006|200600006|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600006|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "574fd8f44852a750", "measure_id": "200600006", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, reconstruct, or replace Piedmont public school buildings to reduce dangers from earthquakes and to meet state and federal seismic safety standards, provide safe classrooms and facilities and to improve the likelihood of Piedmont schools qualifying for state matching funds, shall the Piedmont City Unified School district issue a maximum of $56 million in bonds with interest rates within legal limits, and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to guarantee all money raised in the community benefits local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2497, "no_votes": 1797, "total_votes": 4294, "percent_yes": 58.15090824406148, "percent_no": 41.84909175593852, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.418550", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.407730", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, reconstruct, or replace Piedmont public school buildings to reduce dangers from earthquakes and to meet state and federal seismic safety standards, provide safe classrooms and facilities and to improve the likelihood of Piedmont schools qualifying for state matching funds, shall the Piedmont City Unified School district issue a maximum of $56 million in bonds with interest rates within legal limits, and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to guarantee all money raised in the community benefits local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11660, "fingerprint": "2006|200600261|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600261|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1413ac0b8609b24a", "measure_id": "200600261", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a Resolution adopting an amendment to the General Plan, Waterfront Plan and Waterfront Specific Plan to establish an \"As Of Right\" use for public or commercial recreation sports facilities and exempting such use from the requirements for a Master Development Plan (MDP) and Use Permit to accommodate the proposed Gilman Street Playing Fields be adopted by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28583, "no_votes": 7230, "total_votes": 35813, "percent_yes": 79.81180018429062, "percent_no": 20.188199815709382, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.439168", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.422029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.409934", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Resolution adopting an amendment to the General Plan, Waterfront Plan and Waterfront Specific Plan to establish an \"As Of Right\" use for public or commercial recreation sports facilities and exempting such use from the requirements for a Master Development Plan (MDP) and Use Permit to accommodate the proposed Gilman Street Playing Fields be adopted by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7518, "fingerprint": "2006|200600053|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600053|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "50736bb5741b2328", "measure_id": "200600053", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve a Street Paving and Storm Drain Facility Improvement Parcel Tax in the amount of $96.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit to raise revenue for city wide street paving and storm drain facility repairs and improvements, as is specifically set forth in the proposed Ordinance that appears in the voter pamphlet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3119, "no_votes": 1266, "total_votes": 4385, "percent_yes": 71.12884834663626, "percent_no": 28.87115165336374, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.419126", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.408116", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve a Street Paving and Storm Drain Facility Improvement Parcel Tax in the amount of $96.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit to raise revenue for city wide street paving and storm drain facility repairs and improvements, as is specifically set forth in the proposed Ordinance that appears in the voter pamphlet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11661, "fingerprint": "2006|200600262|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600262|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8bb733a62d49377f", "measure_id": "200600262", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the People of the City of Berkeley have a goal of 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and advise the Mayor to work with the community to develop a plan for Council adoption in 2007, which sets a ten year emissions reduction target and identifies actions by the City and residents to achieve both the ten year target and the ultimate goal of 80% emissions reduction?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33293, "no_votes": 7161, "total_votes": 40454, "percent_yes": 82.29841301231028, "percent_no": 17.701586987689723, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.439428", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.422294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.410113", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the People of the City of Berkeley have a goal of 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and advise the Mayor to work with the community to develop a plan for Council adoption in 2007, which sets a ten year emissions reduction target and identifies actions by the City and residents to achieve both the ten year target and the ultimate goal of 80% emissions reduction?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7519, "fingerprint": "2006|200600054|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600054|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "345b03d4f98ecdf0", "measure_id": "200600054", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve a Special Supplemental Library Services Tax in the amount of $24.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit to raise revenue for the Albany Library to maintain and improve library services in Albany, including the addition of four service hours on Sunday, as set forth in the proposed ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3186, "no_votes": 1218, "total_votes": 4404, "percent_yes": 72.34332425068119, "percent_no": 27.656675749318808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.419422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.408300", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve a Special Supplemental Library Services Tax in the amount of $24.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit to raise revenue for the Albany Library to maintain and improve library services in Albany, including the addition of four service hours on Sunday, as set forth in the proposed ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11662, "fingerprint": "2006|200600263|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600263|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "015108f7de150f0d", "measure_id": "200600263", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Berkeley petition the United States House of Representatives to initiate proceedings for the impeachment and removal from office of President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard B. Cheney and call upon the California State Legislature to submit a Resolution in support of impeachment to the United States House of Representatives?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28096, "no_votes": 12317, "total_votes": 40413, "percent_yes": 69.52218345581868, "percent_no": 30.477816544181323, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.439683", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.422561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.410292", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Berkeley petition the United States House of Representatives to initiate proceedings for the impeachment and removal from office of President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard B. Cheney and call upon the California State Legislature to submit a Resolution in support of impeachment to the United States House of Representatives?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7520, "fingerprint": "2006|200600055|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600055|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "29e360c1ab90b171", "measure_id": "200600055", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve the modification of Section 3.23 of the City Charter to provide that appointees to committees or commissions serve for a term lasting until the next general election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2924, "no_votes": 844, "total_votes": 3768, "percent_yes": 77.60084925690022, "percent_no": 22.39915074309978, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.419691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.408480", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve the modification of Section 3.23 of the City Charter to provide that appointees to committees or commissions serve for a term lasting until the next general election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11663, "fingerprint": "2006|200600264|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600264|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "741f25f2b187bbce", "measure_id": "200600264", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to: 1) increase annual condominium conversions from 100 to 500 units; 2) increase the ability to evict tenants of converted units; 3) significantly reduce per unit the affordable housing fee; 4) entitle tenants to purchase their unit at a 5% discount; and 5) eliminate certain existing restrictions on conversion?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10045, "no_votes": 28396, "total_votes": 38441, "percent_yes": 26.1309539293983, "percent_no": 73.8690460706017, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.439959", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.422908", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.410475", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to: 1) increase annual condominium conversions from 100 to 500 units; 2) increase the ability to evict tenants of converted units; 3) significantly reduce per unit the affordable housing fee; 4) entitle tenants to purchase their unit at a 5% discount; and 5) eliminate certain existing restrictions on conversion?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7521, "fingerprint": "2006|200600056|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600056|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "567fa1afa5e5afaf", "measure_id": "200600056", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for San Leandro's general City services, including police and fire services, senior programs, youth activities, street repairs, park maintenance and library programs and hours, shall an Ordinance amending Section 2-2-500 of the San Leandro Municipal Code to increase the business license fees charged to businesses operating within the City of San Leandro be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9785, "no_votes": 4728, "total_votes": 14513, "percent_yes": 67.42231103148902, "percent_no": 32.577688968510984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.420000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.408663", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for San Leandro's general City services, including police and fire services, senior programs, youth activities, street repairs, park maintenance and library programs and hours, shall an Ordinance amending Section 2-2-500 of the San Leandro Municipal Code to increase the business license fees charged to businesses operating within the City of San Leandro be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7525, "fingerprint": "2006|200600265|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600265|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1aba3e918f79fbdb", "measure_id": "200600265", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted: 1) granting the Landmarks Preservation Commission new authority to prohibit demolition of historic resources; 2) authorizing the Planning Director to suspend any application affecting a historic resource in an emergency; 3) extending the time during which the City may not act on applications to demolish nonresidential buildings over 40 years old; and 4) making it easier to initiate designation of historic districts and structures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16659, "no_votes": 21869, "total_votes": 38528, "percent_yes": 43.23868355481727, "percent_no": 56.76131644518273, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.423203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.410661", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted: 1) granting the Landmarks Preservation Commission new authority to prohibit demolition of historic resources; 2) authorizing the Planning Director to suspend any application affecting a historic resource in an emergency; 3) extending the time during which the City may not act on applications to demolish nonresidential buildings over 40 years old; and 4) making it easier to initiate designation of historic districts and structures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7526, "fingerprint": "2006|200600266|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600266|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1cd0dae564eb275c", "measure_id": "200600266", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the voters of the City of Fremont adopt the Initiative to Change the Open Space and Restricted Industrial General Plan Designations for a Portion of Fremont's Northern Plain Planning Area to Agriculture?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14977, "no_votes": 28844, "total_votes": 43821, "percent_yes": 34.17767736929782, "percent_no": 65.82232263070219, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.423487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.410844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the voters of the City of Fremont adopt the Initiative to Change the Open Space and Restricted Industrial General Plan Designations for a Portion of Fremont's Northern Plain Planning Area to Agriculture?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7527, "fingerprint": "2006|200600267|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600267|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0a8d7f9bd4c7b474", "measure_id": "200600267", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve the safety and character of Fremont and maintain essential general fund services such as police, fire and street and park maintenance, shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a gas and electric utility users tax of four percent, limited to six years and subject to independent annual financial audits, and establishing an independent Fremont taxpayers' committee to review expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18579, "no_votes": 24976, "total_votes": 43555, "percent_yes": 42.65641143381931, "percent_no": 57.34358856618069, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.423814", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.411031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve the safety and character of Fremont and maintain essential general fund services such as police, fire and street and park maintenance, shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a gas and electric utility users tax of four percent, limited to six years and subject to independent annual financial audits, and establishing an independent Fremont taxpayers' committee to review expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7528, "fingerprint": "2006|200600268|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600268|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "196f7ac054e43913", "measure_id": "200600268", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 2601(e) of the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to provide that the Police and Fire Retirement Board shall make investment decisions regarding common stocks and mutual funds in accordance with the prudent person standard as established by court decisions and as required by the California Constitution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59105, "no_votes": 26924, "total_votes": 86029, "percent_yes": 68.70357670087994, "percent_no": 31.296423299120065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.424113", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.411212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 2601(e) of the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to provide that the Police and Fire Retirement Board shall make investment decisions regarding common stocks and mutual funds in accordance with the prudent person standard as established by court decisions and as required by the California Constitution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7529, "fingerprint": "2006|200600269|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600269|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "599373ddd0674d3a", "measure_id": "200600269", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To construct a new Main Library at the Henry J. Kaiser Convention Center and to acquire land and construct new branch library facilities and to renovate and expand branch library facilities, shall the City of Oakland issue $148,000,000 in bonds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62126, "no_votes": 34712, "total_votes": 96838, "percent_yes": 64.15456742187983, "percent_no": 35.84543257812017, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.424381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.411480", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new Main Library at the Henry J. Kaiser Convention Center and to acquire land and construct new branch library facilities and to renovate and expand branch library facilities, shall the City of Oakland issue $148,000,000 in bonds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7530, "fingerprint": "2006|200600270|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600270|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d525139be920d569", "measure_id": "200600270", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require the use of ranked choice voting, known sometimes as instant runoff voting, to elect city offices by a majority vote at a November election without holding a prior June election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64093, "no_votes": 29299, "total_votes": 93392, "percent_yes": 68.62793387013878, "percent_no": 31.372066129861224, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.424651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.411719", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require the use of ranked choice voting, known sometimes as instant runoff voting, to elect city offices by a majority vote at a November election without holding a prior June election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7531, "fingerprint": "2006|200600271|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600271|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "116d236316a17916", "measure_id": "200600271", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Bernal Property Phase II Land Use Plan, comprised of the \"grand park\" design concept, as adopted by the City Council, be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17685, "no_votes": 3856, "total_votes": 21541, "percent_yes": 82.09925258808784, "percent_no": 17.900747411912164, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.424918", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.411943", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bernal Property Phase II Land Use Plan, comprised of the \"grand park\" design concept, as adopted by the City Council, be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7532, "fingerprint": "2006|200600019|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600019|AMADOR", "content_hash": "8823dcaa4e4b12f8", "measure_id": "200600019", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Amador County Vector Control District impose a parcel tax of $11 on each parcel within the County, including within cities, except that contiguous parcels owned by the same owner would be taxed $11 collectively?  The revenue may be used only for vector control measures in Amador County including the cities therein.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3852, "no_votes": 6981, "total_votes": 10833, "percent_yes": 35.55801716975907, "percent_no": 64.44198283024093, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.425803", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.412598", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Amador County Vector Control District impose a parcel tax of $11 on each parcel within the County, including within cities, except that contiguous parcels owned by the same owner would be taxed $11 collectively?  The revenue may be used only for vector control measures in Amador County including the cities therein.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7534, "fingerprint": "2006|200600102|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600102|BUTTE", "content_hash": "435fcd999a125abb", "measure_id": "200600102", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to complete construction at Ishi Hills Middle School, including building a gymnasium and multipurpose building with space for a basketball court, music classroom, theater, cafeteria, and kitchen, developing athletic fields and installing bleachers, constructing classrooms and school office space, and purchasing computers, desks, and chairs, shall the Oroville City Elementary School District issue $10 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2697, "no_votes": 3235, "total_votes": 5932, "percent_yes": 45.46527309507754, "percent_no": 54.53472690492246, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.426401", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.412966", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to complete construction at Ishi Hills Middle School, including building a gymnasium and multipurpose building with space for a basketball court, music classroom, theater, cafeteria, and kitchen, developing athletic fields and installing bleachers, constructing classrooms and school office space, and purchasing computers, desks, and chairs, shall the Oroville City Elementary School District issue $10 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7535, "fingerprint": "2006|200600198|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600198|BUTTE", "content_hash": "48072bc771df187c", "measure_id": "200600198", "measure_letter": "C1", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special property tax in the amount of $70 per residential equivalent unit, as enacted by Butte County Ordinance No. 3937 for a period of ten years, to fund stand-by costs of providing emergency room services at the Biggs-Gridley Memorial Hospital, and a corresponding increase in the County's spending limit for a period of four years, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1549, "no_votes": 518, "total_votes": 2067, "percent_yes": 74.93952588292211, "percent_no": 25.060474117077888, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.426763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.413145", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special property tax in the amount of $70 per residential equivalent unit, as enacted by Butte County Ordinance No. 3937 for a period of ten years, to fund stand-by costs of providing emergency room services at the Biggs-Gridley Memorial Hospital, and a corresponding increase in the County's spending limit for a period of four years, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11666, "fingerprint": "2006|200600272|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600272|BUTTE", "content_hash": "f88eeb711427672c", "measure_id": "200600272", "measure_letter": "C2", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special property tax to fund stand-by costs of providing emergency room services at the Biggs-Gridley Hospital, in the amount of $70 per residential equivalent unit per year for ten years (vacant parcels and parcels without residential units shall not be subject to the tax), as enacted by the City of Biggs Resolution No. 2006-14, and a corresponding increase in the City's spending limit, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 308, "no_votes": 89, "total_votes": 397, "percent_yes": 77.58186397984886, "percent_no": 22.418136020151138, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.443007", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.427066", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.413324", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special property tax to fund stand-by costs of providing emergency room services at the Biggs-Gridley Hospital, in the amount of $70 per residential equivalent unit per year for ten years (vacant parcels and parcels without residential units shall not be subject to the tax), as enacted by the City of Biggs Resolution No. 2006-14, and a corresponding increase in the City's spending limit, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11667, "fingerprint": "2006|200600273|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600273|BUTTE", "content_hash": "8be53328190d236d", "measure_id": "200600273", "measure_letter": "C3", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special property tax to fund stand-by costs of providing emergency room services at the Biggs-Gridley Hospital, in the amount $70 per residential equivalent unit per year for ten years (vacant parcels and parcels without residential units shall not be subject to the tax), as enacted by City Resolution 2006-R-035, and a corresponding increase in the City's spending limit, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1068, "no_votes": 316, "total_votes": 1384, "percent_yes": 77.16763005780348, "percent_no": 22.83236994219652, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.443204", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.427522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.413503", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special property tax to fund stand-by costs of providing emergency room services at the Biggs-Gridley Hospital, in the amount $70 per residential equivalent unit per year for ten years (vacant parcels and parcels without residential units shall not be subject to the tax), as enacted by City Resolution 2006-R-035, and a corresponding increase in the City's spending limit, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7533, "fingerprint": "2006|200600101|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600101|BUTTE", "content_hash": "eeda2c74fa0e4e55", "measure_id": "200600101", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by repairing and modernizing worn-out local schools, such as repairing, upgrading or replacing roofs, heating/air conditioning and plumbing systems; constructing, acquiring, converting, furnishing and equipping school facilities; and to help qualify for State modernization and construction matching funds, shall the Marysville Joint Unified School District issue $37,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, independent audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84, "no_votes": 82, "total_votes": 166, "percent_yes": 50.60240963855421, "percent_no": 49.39759036144579, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.426103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.412782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by repairing and modernizing worn-out local schools, such as repairing, upgrading or replacing roofs, heating/air conditioning and plumbing systems; constructing, acquiring, converting, furnishing and equipping school facilities; and to help qualify for State modernization and construction matching funds, shall the Marysville Joint Unified School District issue $37,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, independent audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7536, "fingerprint": "2006|200600453|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600453|BUTTE", "content_hash": "d97265f72762998a", "measure_id": "200600453", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75, "no_votes": 107, "total_votes": 182, "percent_yes": 41.2087912087912, "percent_no": 58.7912087912088, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.427824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.413687", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7537, "fingerprint": "2006|200600454|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600454|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "14465f42a908361b", "measure_id": "200600454", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize/replace aging classrooms, build new classrooms, improve computer technology, replace fire alarm and safety communication systems, expand school libraries, construct an auditorium/theater and repair and upgrade athletic fields, and to qualify for approximately $8 million of State matching funds, shall Calaveras Unified School District issue $13.5 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and annual audits, all funds benefiting local schools and no funds going to administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5241, "no_votes": 4155, "total_votes": 9396, "percent_yes": 55.77905491698595, "percent_no": 44.22094508301405, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.428099", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.413868", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize/replace aging classrooms, build new classrooms, improve computer technology, replace fire alarm and safety communication systems, expand school libraries, construct an auditorium/theater and repair and upgrade athletic fields, and to qualify for approximately $8 million of State matching funds, shall Calaveras Unified School District issue $13.5 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight and annual audits, all funds benefiting local schools and no funds going to administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7539, "fingerprint": "2006|200600274|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600274|COLUSA", "content_hash": "53982478a3499724", "measure_id": "200600274", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk in the City of Williams be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 227, "no_votes": 290, "total_votes": 517, "percent_yes": 43.90715667311411, "percent_no": 56.09284332688589, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.428722", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.414233", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk in the City of Williams be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7540, "fingerprint": "2006|200600275|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600275|COLUSA", "content_hash": "bf94ac69759d261a", "measure_id": "200600275", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer in the City of Williams be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 215, "no_votes": 295, "total_votes": 510, "percent_yes": 42.15686274509804, "percent_no": 57.84313725490196, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.428987", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.414416", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer in the City of Williams be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11668, "fingerprint": "2006|200600276|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600276|COLUSA", "content_hash": "64d7e288d1ad9a48", "measure_id": "200600276", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Williams enact a one-half cent sales tax for a period of six years to help preserve the safety and character of Williams, by funding essential services such as road maintenance, fire/police services, and other general governmental purposes, requiring a published annual report on General Fund expenditures, and requiring a public hearing by the City Council every three years to determine whether the tax is still necessary?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 289, "no_votes": 244, "total_votes": 533, "percent_yes": 54.22138836772983, "percent_no": 45.77861163227017, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.444428", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.429250", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.414602", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Williams enact a one-half cent sales tax for a period of six years to help preserve the safety and character of Williams, by funding essential services such as road maintenance, fire/police services, and other general governmental purposes, requiring a published annual report on General Fund expenditures, and requiring a public hearing by the City Council every three years to determine whether the tax is still necessary?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7538, "fingerprint": "2006|200600020|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600020|COLUSA", "content_hash": "3dd88e04bdb4aa18", "measure_id": "200600020", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the County oppose off-reservation Indian casinos in Colusa County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3365, "no_votes": 718, "total_votes": 4083, "percent_yes": 82.41489101151114, "percent_no": 17.585108988488855, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.428424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.414048", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the County oppose off-reservation Indian casinos in Colusa County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7541, "fingerprint": "2006|200600455|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600455|COLUSA", "content_hash": "d97265f72762998a", "measure_id": "200600455", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2128, "no_votes": 2579, "total_votes": 4707, "percent_yes": 45.20926280008498, "percent_no": 54.79073719991502, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.429530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.414784", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7545, "fingerprint": "2006|200600104|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600104|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f5886519ba9d4027", "measure_id": "200600104", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate aging college facilities (making energy savings, safety, and handicapped accessibility improvements), and update facilities used by transfer, career and vocational students (for math, science, nursing, technology and other programs) at Contra Costa College, Diablo Valley College, Los Medanos College, the San Ramon Valley and Brentwood centers, shall the Contra Costa Community College District issue $286,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee to monitor spending?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 99077, "no_votes": 74192, "total_votes": 173269, "percent_yes": 57.181030651761134, "percent_no": 42.818969348238866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.430675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.415502", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate aging college facilities (making energy savings, safety, and handicapped accessibility improvements), and update facilities used by transfer, career and vocational students (for math, science, nursing, technology and other programs) at Contra Costa College, Diablo Valley College, Los Medanos College, the San Ramon Valley and Brentwood centers, shall the Contra Costa Community College District issue $286,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee to monitor spending?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7546, "fingerprint": "2006|200600105|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600105|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "4a0955d66cb58818", "measure_id": "200600105", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student reading, writing, math and science skills by recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers and staff, restore programs and positions lost due to budget cuts, and benefit local schools, shall the John Swett Unified School District levy an annual special tax of $70 per residential parcel and a tax on commercial property in the amounts described in the voter pamphlet, for 5 years, with annual audits, independent oversight, and an exemption for homeowners 65 or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1857, "no_votes": 1024, "total_votes": 2881, "percent_yes": 64.45678583825061, "percent_no": 35.54321416174939, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.430945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.415686", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student reading, writing, math and science skills by recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers and staff, restore programs and positions lost due to budget cuts, and benefit local schools, shall the John Swett Unified School District levy an annual special tax of $70 per residential parcel and a tax on commercial property in the amounts described in the voter pamphlet, for 5 years, with annual audits, independent oversight, and an exemption for homeowners 65 or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7544, "fingerprint": "2006|200600103|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600103|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6c5394c937470e6c", "measure_id": "200600103", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Byron Union School District be authorized to renovate and modernize existing classrooms and school facilities, construct a library for school and community use, build additional classrooms to relieve overcrowding, make health and safety improvements and upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to computers and modern technology by issuing $19,700,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits and no money for administrator or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1617, "no_votes": 1150, "total_votes": 2767, "percent_yes": 58.43874232020239, "percent_no": 41.56125767979761, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.430375", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.415323", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Byron Union School District be authorized to renovate and modernize existing classrooms and school facilities, construct a library for school and community use, build additional classrooms to relieve overcrowding, make health and safety improvements and upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to computers and modern technology by issuing $19,700,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits and no money for administrator or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7543, "fingerprint": "2006|200600057|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600057|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "20edea3790e12d6d", "measure_id": "200600057", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Crockett Reorganization, comprised of the formation of the Crockett Community Services District and dissolution of the Crockett-Valona Sanitary District, dissolution of County Service Area P-1, and dissolution of County Sanitation District No. 5 (Port Costa), be approved subject to the terms and conditions in the LAFCO resolution of approval upon an affirmative vote by a majority of those voting within the territory shown in Exhibit A?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 900, "no_votes": 143, "total_votes": 1043, "percent_yes": 86.28954937679771, "percent_no": 13.710450623202291, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.430068", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.415144", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Crockett Reorganization, comprised of the formation of the Crockett Community Services District and dissolution of the Crockett-Valona Sanitary District, dissolution of County Service Area P-1, and dissolution of County Sanitation District No. 5 (Port Costa), be approved subject to the terms and conditions in the LAFCO resolution of approval upon an affirmative vote by a majority of those voting within the territory shown in Exhibit A?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7542, "fingerprint": "2006|200600021|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600021|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2c80f30365b0c460", "measure_id": "200600021", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 be established at $2,487,218.00 and should the limit for that Fiscal Year (i.e., $2,487,218.00) be used to determine the limits for Fiscal Years 2007-2008 through 2009-2010?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1574, "no_votes": 201, "total_votes": 1775, "percent_yes": 88.67605633802816, "percent_no": 11.323943661971839, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.429797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.414965", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 be established at $2,487,218.00 and should the limit for that Fiscal Year (i.e., $2,487,218.00) be used to determine the limits for Fiscal Years 2007-2008 through 2009-2010?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7557, "fingerprint": "2006|200600457|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600457|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d3b224bce282a89a", "measure_id": "200600457", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build new classrooms at Pittsburg high schools, emphasize science, technology, and vocational rooms, separate ninth and tenth grade classrooms and facilities, upgrade cafeteria and library, renovate restrooms, and upgrade electrical and plumbing systems, shall Pittsburg Unified School District be authorized to repair, replace, construct and renovate school facilities and equipment and issue $85,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrator salaries and an independent oversight committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7288, "no_votes": 2545, "total_votes": 9833, "percent_yes": 74.11776670395606, "percent_no": 25.882233296043935, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.434030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.417685", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build new classrooms at Pittsburg high schools, emphasize science, technology, and vocational rooms, separate ninth and tenth grade classrooms and facilities, upgrade cafeteria and library, renovate restrooms, and upgrade electrical and plumbing systems, shall Pittsburg Unified School District be authorized to repair, replace, construct and renovate school facilities and equipment and issue $85,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with no funds for administrator salaries and an independent oversight committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7556, "fingerprint": "2006|200600456|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600456|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "98a6b56a8228b0fe", "measure_id": "200600456", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a fourth high school to prevent overcrowding at Liberty, Freedom and Heritage High Schools, build new classrooms, science and computer labs at Liberty High School, build a theater at Freedom High School, and acquire land for a fifth high school, shall Liberty Union High School District be authorized to repair, replace, acquire, construct and renovate school facilities and issue $85,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates and create an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12156, "no_votes": 10689, "total_votes": 22845, "percent_yes": 53.2107682206172, "percent_no": 46.7892317793828, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.433732", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.417501", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a fourth high school to prevent overcrowding at Liberty, Freedom and Heritage High Schools, build new classrooms, science and computer labs at Liberty High School, build a theater at Freedom High School, and acquire land for a fifth high school, shall Liberty Union High School District be authorized to repair, replace, acquire, construct and renovate school facilities and issue $85,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates and create an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7547, "fingerprint": "2006|200600199|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600199|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "03c105001079c7fb", "measure_id": "200600199", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the voters amend the Contra Costa County General Plan (2005-2020) and the County's 65/35 Land Preservation Plan Ordinance (County Ordinance Code, Chapter 82-1) to: (i) extend the term of the County's Urban Limit Line to the Year 2026; (ii) require voter approval to expand the line by more than 30 acres; (iii) adopt a new Urban Limit Line Map; and (iv) establish new review procedures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 164426, "no_votes": 93490, "total_votes": 257916, "percent_yes": 63.75176414026272, "percent_no": 36.24823585973728, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.431214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.415867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters amend the Contra Costa County General Plan (2005-2020) and the County's 65/35 Land Preservation Plan Ordinance (County Ordinance Code, Chapter 82-1) to: (i) extend the term of the County's Urban Limit Line to the Year 2026; (ii) require voter approval to expand the line by more than 30 acres; (iii) adopt a new Urban Limit Line Map; and (iv) establish new review procedures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7548, "fingerprint": "2006|200600200|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600200|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "0f33e152edda4b39", "measure_id": "200600200", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2006-40 of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors be adopted to authorize the alternate member appointed by the Board of Supervisors to the Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association Board of Retirement to serve as the alternate for a County Supervisor member of the Board of Retirement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143935, "no_votes": 99133, "total_votes": 243068, "percent_yes": 59.21593957246532, "percent_no": 40.78406042753468, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.431483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.416046", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2006-40 of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors be adopted to authorize the alternate member appointed by the Board of Supervisors to the Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association Board of Retirement to serve as the alternate for a County Supervisor member of the Board of Retirement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7549, "fingerprint": "2006|200600277|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600277|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "200600277", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8267, "no_votes": 3841, "total_votes": 12108, "percent_yes": 68.2771721176082, "percent_no": 31.722827882391798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.431755", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.416225", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7550, "fingerprint": "2006|200600278|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600278|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "dbb27af74eda44a8", "measure_id": "200600278", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Downtown Park's annual operation and maintenance expenses be funded for a period of 10 years by the formation of a citywide Community Facilities District with an initial appropriations limit of $100,600 and an annual levy of special taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3514, "no_votes": 1464, "total_votes": 4978, "percent_yes": 70.59059863398956, "percent_no": 29.409401366010442, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.432066", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.416403", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Downtown Park's annual operation and maintenance expenses be funded for a period of 10 years by the formation of a citywide Community Facilities District with an initial appropriations limit of $100,600 and an annual levy of special taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7551, "fingerprint": "2006|200600279|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600279|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "119a696f995d30d1", "measure_id": "200600279", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To better protect the health, welfare and safety of Lafayette citizens by hiring additional police officers and purchasing equipment for the Police Department, shall the City be authorized to collect a parcel tax not to exceed $64 per year per residential equivalent unit for five years; with funds deposited into a restricted account and overseen by an independent citizen's oversight committee guaranteeing that the money cannot be used for other purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6753, "no_votes": 4390, "total_votes": 11143, "percent_yes": 60.60306919142062, "percent_no": 39.39693080857938, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.432361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.416591", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better protect the health, welfare and safety of Lafayette citizens by hiring additional police officers and purchasing equipment for the Police Department, shall the City be authorized to collect a parcel tax not to exceed $64 per year per residential equivalent unit for five years; with funds deposited into a restricted account and overseen by an independent citizen's oversight committee guaranteeing that the money cannot be used for other purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7552, "fingerprint": "2006|200600280|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600280|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "aa58da47cc4d92fd", "measure_id": "200600280", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To repair damaged roads; fix potholes; improve driver and pedestrian safety; improve children's safety near schools; replace fire hydrants and pipes, ensuring adequate water flow for firefighting; and repair collapsing storm drains to prevent flooding; shall the City of Orinda issue $59.1 million in bonds for the improvement of roadways, storm drains and water mains, with annual financial audits and no money for new City staff?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6043, "no_votes": 3344, "total_votes": 9387, "percent_yes": 64.376265047406, "percent_no": 35.623734952594006, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.432629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.416774", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair damaged roads; fix potholes; improve driver and pedestrian safety; improve children's safety near schools; replace fire hydrants and pipes, ensuring adequate water flow for firefighting; and repair collapsing storm drains to prevent flooding; shall the City of Orinda issue $59.1 million in bonds for the improvement of roadways, storm drains and water mains, with annual financial audits and no money for new City staff?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7553, "fingerprint": "2006|200600281|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600281|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "200600281", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2223, "no_votes": 3082, "total_votes": 5305, "percent_yes": 41.90386427898209, "percent_no": 58.09613572101791, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.432896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.416956", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7554, "fingerprint": "2006|200600282|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600282|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7cf90a4a6696b6c0", "measure_id": "200600282", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted enacting a local half-cent transaction and use (sales) tax to preserve and improve essential City services, including, but not limited to public safety, as well as street and storm drain repair?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3308, "no_votes": 2238, "total_votes": 5546, "percent_yes": 59.64659213847818, "percent_no": 40.35340786152182, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.433158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.417135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted enacting a local half-cent transaction and use (sales) tax to preserve and improve essential City services, including, but not limited to public safety, as well as street and storm drain repair?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7555, "fingerprint": "2006|200600283|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600283|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2154e300a903321a", "measure_id": "200600283", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Richmond Business License Act be adopted effective January 1, 2007, which will levy a new tax on manufacturing, including oil refining, equal to 1/8% of the value of the raw materials used in the manufacturing process per year, increase most other categories of business taxes by 10% with certain other adjustments, and annually tax landlords at up to $90 per unit for residential property and three cents per square foot for non-residential property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8244, "no_votes": 11238, "total_votes": 19482, "percent_yes": 42.31598398521712, "percent_no": 57.68401601478288, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.433425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.417317", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Richmond Business License Act be adopted effective January 1, 2007, which will levy a new tax on manufacturing, including oil refining, equal to 1/8% of the value of the raw materials used in the manufacturing process per year, increase most other categories of business taxes by 10% with certain other adjustments, and annually tax landlords at up to $90 per unit for residential property and three cents per square foot for non-residential property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11669, "fingerprint": "2006|200600201|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600201|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "db0a9069d105ff34", "measure_id": "200600201", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Del Norte County Ordinance number 2006-11, repealing the exemption from payment of transient occupancy tax for federal or state officers or employees when on official business be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3351, "no_votes": 3135, "total_votes": 6486, "percent_yes": 51.66512488436633, "percent_no": 48.33487511563367, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.448327", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.434568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.418049", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Del Norte County Ordinance number 2006-11, repealing the exemption from payment of transient occupancy tax for federal or state officers or employees when on official business be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7558, "fingerprint": "2006|200600022|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600022|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "12c91340bacca5ef", "measure_id": "200600022", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Del Norte County Ordinance authorizing a limited transaction and use tax of one-quarter of one percent, expiring after eight years, to be used exclusively to extend library hours at the Crescent City, Smith River and Klamath libraries, expand services to Gasquet/Hiouchi, purchase new books and media, promote literacy and school success, and restore programs for adults and seniors, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3953, "no_votes": 2036, "total_votes": 5989, "percent_yes": 66.00434129236933, "percent_no": 33.99565870763067, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.434296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.417866", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Del Norte County Ordinance authorizing a limited transaction and use tax of one-quarter of one percent, expiring after eight years, to be used exclusively to extend library hours at the Crescent City, Smith River and Klamath libraries, expand services to Gasquet/Hiouchi, purchase new books and media, promote literacy and school success, and restore programs for adults and seniors, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7559, "fingerprint": "2006|200600202|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600202|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "a12b28436d5b3cbc", "measure_id": "200600202", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Del Norte County Ordinance number 2006-12, increasing the transient occupancy tax rate from 8% to 10% be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2595, "no_votes": 3977, "total_votes": 6572, "percent_yes": 39.48569689592209, "percent_no": 60.51430310407791, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.434844", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.418232", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Del Norte County Ordinance number 2006-12, increasing the transient occupancy tax rate from 8% to 10% be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7560, "fingerprint": "2006|200600203|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600203|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "a8dce86a50a637be", "measure_id": "200600203", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance number 2006-13, applying the transient occupancy tax to the rental of spaces in recreational vehicle parks be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2429, "no_votes": 4133, "total_votes": 6562, "percent_yes": 37.01615361170375, "percent_no": 62.98384638829625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.435144", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.418414", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance number 2006-13, applying the transient occupancy tax to the rental of spaces in recreational vehicle parks be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7561, "fingerprint": "2006|200600284|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600284|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "14847e6885339d0b", "measure_id": "200600284", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council of the City of Crescent City increase by two percent (2%) the general tax for the privilege of transient occupancy in any hotel or other lodging as defined in Chapter 3.20 of the Crescent City Municipal Code, which increase would set the total transient occupancy tax at twelve percent (12%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 251, "no_votes": 517, "total_votes": 768, "percent_yes": 32.68229166666667, "percent_no": 67.31770833333333, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.435438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.418597", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council of the City of Crescent City increase by two percent (2%) the general tax for the privilege of transient occupancy in any hotel or other lodging as defined in Chapter 3.20 of the Crescent City Municipal Code, which increase would set the total transient occupancy tax at twelve percent (12%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7562, "fingerprint": "2006|200600106|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600106|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a8c5d92c5bdf1ea3", "measure_id": "200600106", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety conditions, repair and upgrade all neighborhood schools, shall the Mother Lode Union Elementary School District make health and safety improvements to student drop-off areas, expand parking areas, improve fields, eliminate asbestos, upgrade heating and cooling systems, and computer, electrical, and communication systems construct, acquire, repair, furnish and equip classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $11,400,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2405, "no_votes": 2104, "total_votes": 4509, "percent_yes": 53.337768906631176, "percent_no": 46.662231093368824, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.435711", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.418779", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety conditions, repair and upgrade all neighborhood schools, shall the Mother Lode Union Elementary School District make health and safety improvements to student drop-off areas, expand parking areas, improve fields, eliminate asbestos, upgrade heating and cooling systems, and computer, electrical, and communication systems construct, acquire, repair, furnish and equip classrooms, sites and facilities by issuing $11,400,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7563, "fingerprint": "2006|200600107|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600107|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "542d23197c0b13a4", "measure_id": "200600107", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year colleges, plan for growth, improve safety by repairing sewers, leaky roofs, decaying walls, plumbing and electrical systems, constructing, repairing classrooms, labs, sites, nursing/police/fire safety facilities, purchasing equipment, upgrading computer technology and providing training, shall Sierra College School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $78,200,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 747, "no_votes": 1024, "total_votes": 1771, "percent_yes": 42.17955957086391, "percent_no": 57.82044042913609, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.436008", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.418964", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year colleges, plan for growth, improve safety by repairing sewers, leaky roofs, decaying walls, plumbing and electrical systems, constructing, repairing classrooms, labs, sites, nursing/police/fire safety facilities, purchasing equipment, upgrading computer technology and providing training, shall Sierra College School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $78,200,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7568, "fingerprint": "2006|200600458|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600458|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "dbaf892c00b863d5", "measure_id": "200600458", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and the quality of education throughout the Black Oak Mine Unified School District, shall the District repair, improve, update, replace, construct, furnish and equip school facilities and classrooms, such as fire safety and septic systems, plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems, and science and computer laboratories; and help qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $6,900,000 of bonds, with accountability provided by citizens' oversight and independent audits, and with no funds used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3768, "no_votes": 2266, "total_votes": 6034, "percent_yes": 62.44613854822671, "percent_no": 37.55386145177329, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.437407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.419872", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and the quality of education throughout the Black Oak Mine Unified School District, shall the District repair, improve, update, replace, construct, furnish and equip school facilities and classrooms, such as fire safety and septic systems, plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems, and science and computer laboratories; and help qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $6,900,000 of bonds, with accountability provided by citizens' oversight and independent audits, and with no funds used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7564, "fingerprint": "2006|200600204|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600204|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "5f34375ba4021792", "measure_id": "200600204", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special tax be levied within the boundaries of the Cameron Estates Community Services District pursuant to Resolution No. 2006-04 for the purpose of providing road improvements, upgrades, and maintenance at an annual rate not to exceed the following schedule: \r\nA. Residential property - an increase of $950.00 over and above the current assessment of $250.00 for a total amount of $1200.00 per year per residential parcel.\r\nB. Commercial property, described as parcels 109-111-14-100, 109-111-15-100, 109-111-16-100, 109-111-17-100, and 109-111-18-100, - an amount of $4000 per year.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 144, "no_votes": 283, "total_votes": 427, "percent_yes": 33.723653395784545, "percent_no": 66.27634660421546, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.436303", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.419148", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax be levied within the boundaries of the Cameron Estates Community Services District pursuant to Resolution No. 2006-04 for the purpose of providing road improvements, upgrades, and maintenance at an annual rate not to exceed the following schedule: \r\nA. Residential property - an increase of $950.00 over and above the current assessment of $250.00 for a total amount of $1200.00 per year per residential parcel.\r\nB. Commercial property, described as parcels 109-111-14-100, 109-111-15-100, 109-111-16-100, 109-111-17-100, and 109-111-18-100, - an amount of $4000 per year.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7565, "fingerprint": "2006|200600205|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600205|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "520c3f321fe5f783", "measure_id": "200600205", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Springfield Meadows Community Services District be authorized to tax each parcel within the District an additional $150 per year to cover the costs of maintaining and improving community infrastructure and for other lawful purposes of the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 167, "no_votes": 174, "total_votes": 341, "percent_yes": 48.97360703812317, "percent_no": 51.02639296187683, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.436571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.419331", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Springfield Meadows Community Services District be authorized to tax each parcel within the District an additional $150 per year to cover the costs of maintaining and improving community infrastructure and for other lawful purposes of the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7569, "fingerprint": "2006|200600459|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600459|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "dd7253d6b46ba966", "measure_id": "200600459", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education quality and student safety at every school, modernize, update and construct classrooms and school facilities at existing schools and become eligible for millions in additional State money, shall the Buckeye Union School District issue $28,300,000 in bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit?  The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee, conduct annual independent audits, and spend funds only on school and classroom improvements, with NO money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7910, "no_votes": 4760, "total_votes": 12670, "percent_yes": 62.430939226519335, "percent_no": 37.569060773480665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.437705", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.420052", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education quality and student safety at every school, modernize, update and construct classrooms and school facilities at existing schools and become eligible for millions in additional State money, shall the Buckeye Union School District issue $28,300,000 in bonds at interest rates within the statutory limit?  The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee, conduct annual independent audits, and spend funds only on school and classroom improvements, with NO money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7566, "fingerprint": "2006|200600285|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600285|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200600285", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1529, "no_votes": 1470, "total_votes": 2999, "percent_yes": 50.98366122040681, "percent_no": 49.01633877959319, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.436836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.419510", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7567, "fingerprint": "2006|200600286|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600286|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "200600286", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1448, "no_votes": 1560, "total_votes": 3008, "percent_yes": 48.13829787234042, "percent_no": 51.86170212765958, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.437101", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.419693", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11670, "fingerprint": "2006|200600008|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600008|FRESNO", "content_hash": "2efac31343a45b13", "measure_id": "200600008", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ramon R. Dominguez be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor of the City of Huron?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95, "no_votes": 176, "total_votes": 271, "percent_yes": 35.05535055350554, "percent_no": 64.94464944649445, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-04-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.451863", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.438791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.420787", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ramon R. Dominguez be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor of the City of Huron?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7570, "fingerprint": "2006|200600001|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600001|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b96365a2b6a97519", "measure_id": "200600001", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Alex Mezler be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Golden Plains Unified School District, Trustee Area No. 1?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 129, "no_votes": 171, "total_votes": 300, "percent_yes": 43.0, "percent_no": 57.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-02-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.437975", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.420235", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Alex Mezler be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Golden Plains Unified School District, Trustee Area No. 1?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11671, "fingerprint": "2006|200600009|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600009|FRESNO", "content_hash": "100dd55052c73c53", "measure_id": "200600009", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Joe Zavala be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82, "no_votes": 184, "total_votes": 266, "percent_yes": 30.82706766917293, "percent_no": 69.17293233082707, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-04-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.452079", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.439089", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.420972", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Joe Zavala be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7571, "fingerprint": "2006|200600002|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600002|FRESNO", "content_hash": "28121dc659f5a372", "measure_id": "200600002", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Kathy Chaffin be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Golden Plains Unified School District, Trustee Area No. 2?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 132, "no_votes": 170, "total_votes": 302, "percent_yes": 43.70860927152318, "percent_no": 56.29139072847682, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-02-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.438242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.420417", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Kathy Chaffin be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Golden Plains Unified School District, Trustee Area No. 2?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11672, "fingerprint": "2006|200600010|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600010|FRESNO", "content_hash": "881f9402714d4a3a", "measure_id": "200600010", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Hilda R. Plasencia la be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82, "no_votes": 187, "total_votes": 269, "percent_yes": 30.48327137546468, "percent_no": 69.51672862453532, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-04-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.452292", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.439359", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.421153", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Hilda R. Plasencia la be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7572, "fingerprint": "2006|200600003|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600003|FRESNO", "content_hash": "2f03a88a8cb557fa", "measure_id": "200600003", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Rod Lucas be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Golden Plains Unified School District, Trustee Area No. 3?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 148, "no_votes": 150, "total_votes": 298, "percent_yes": 49.66442953020135, "percent_no": 50.33557046979865, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-02-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.438524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.420604", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Rod Lucas be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of Golden Plains Unified School District, Trustee Area No. 3?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11676, "fingerprint": "2006|200600463|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600463|FRESNO", "content_hash": "01d9972f94e69f38", "measure_id": "200600463", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Selma Unified School District be authorized to construct and modernize classrooms and school facilities to relieve student overcrowding, replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems, upgrade fire alarm systems, install outdoor lighting to improve safety and security, and make the District eligible to receive up to $4,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $23,800,000 in bonds, at legal rates with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3091, "no_votes": 1319, "total_votes": 4410, "percent_yes": 70.09070294784581, "percent_no": 29.909297052154187, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.455090", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.442886", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.423328", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Selma Unified School District be authorized to construct and modernize classrooms and school facilities to relieve student overcrowding, replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems, upgrade fire alarm systems, install outdoor lighting to improve safety and security, and make the District eligible to receive up to $4,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $23,800,000 in bonds, at legal rates with annual audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7573, "fingerprint": "2006|200600058|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600058|FRESNO", "content_hash": "84ae0730c78fef85", "measure_id": "200600058", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Charter Section 1504 be repealed to remove the requirement that two new councilmembers be added to the city Council when the population of the City of Fresno reaches 540,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19406, "no_votes": 21720, "total_votes": 41126, "percent_yes": 47.18669454846083, "percent_no": 52.81330545153917, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.439625", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.421339", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter Section 1504 be repealed to remove the requirement that two new councilmembers be added to the city Council when the population of the City of Fresno reaches 540,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11673, "fingerprint": "2006|200600206|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600206|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a0f359e650ca4c6f", "measure_id": "200600206", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To repair potholes, improve/construct local streets/highways; Reduce air pollution through new clean fuel school buses, including child safety seatbelts; Support regional economy; Reduce emergency response times; Improve highways 99, 41, 168, 180; Reduce congestion; Improve public safety; Improve transit, senior/disabled services, transportation choices; match state/federal funds; Provide citizen oversight/annual audits, shall Fresno County Transportation Authority continue, but not increase, existing half-cent sales tax for 20 years, per locally adopted Expenditure Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121655, "no_votes": 34847, "total_votes": 156502, "percent_yes": 77.73383087756068, "percent_no": 22.266169122439322, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.453605", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.441039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.422244", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair potholes, improve/construct local streets/highways; Reduce air pollution through new clean fuel school buses, including child safety seatbelts; Support regional economy; Reduce emergency response times; Improve highways 99, 41, 168, 180; Reduce congestion; Improve public safety; Improve transit, senior/disabled services, transportation choices; match state/federal funds; Provide citizen oversight/annual audits, shall Fresno County Transportation Authority continue, but not increase, existing half-cent sales tax for 20 years, per locally adopted Expenditure Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7574, "fingerprint": "2006|200600108|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600108|FRESNO", "content_hash": "abcf815249174ed8", "measure_id": "200600108", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District be authorized to construct a library media center at Reedley High, an Elementary School in Reedley, Orange Cove High music building, student support facilities including cafeterias/multipurpose buildings, make health and safety improvements, provide additional classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and qualify the District for $8,000,000 in State grants by issuing $32,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2515, "no_votes": 2137, "total_votes": 4652, "percent_yes": 54.0627687016337, "percent_no": 45.9372312983663, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.439926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.421522", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District be authorized to construct a library media center at Reedley High, an Elementary School in Reedley, Orange Cove High music building, student support facilities including cafeterias/multipurpose buildings, make health and safety improvements, provide additional classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and qualify the District for $8,000,000 in State grants by issuing $32,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7577, "fingerprint": "2006|200600111|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600111|FRESNO", "content_hash": "55fd7658a13c2a94", "measure_id": "200600111", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading electrical systems and technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1422, "no_votes": 1407, "total_votes": 2829, "percent_yes": 50.26511134676564, "percent_no": 49.73488865323436, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.440773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.422065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading electrical systems and technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7578, "fingerprint": "2006|200600287|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600287|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d1a07c08ed5b51cd", "measure_id": "200600287", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) This measure is not a tax. It is an advisory measure which states the Fowler City voters' preference that any voter approved continuation of the existing utility users tax be used only to fund the City of Fowler fire and police departments and park and recreational facilities, to help ensure that these services will continue to be provided at the current or an improved level.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 814, "no_votes": 148, "total_votes": 962, "percent_yes": 84.61538461538461, "percent_no": 15.384615384615387, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.441367", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.422426", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) This measure is not a tax. It is an advisory measure which states the Fowler City voters' preference that any voter approved continuation of the existing utility users tax be used only to fund the City of Fowler fire and police departments and park and recreational facilities, to help ensure that these services will continue to be provided at the current or an improved level.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7579, "fingerprint": "2006|200600288|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600288|FRESNO", "content_hash": "81e4506bdc1eca89", "measure_id": "200600288", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing utility users tax approved by the Fowler voters in 2002 be continued at the current rate of five percent (5%) upon residential users of electricity and gas, three percent (3%) upon commercial, industrial, and agricultural users of electricity and gas, and five percent (5%) of the base service rate upon all users of telephone service in the City of Fowler, as set forth in Ordinance Nos. 1999-06, 2002- 04, and 2006-04?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 550, "no_votes": 285, "total_votes": 835, "percent_yes": 65.86826347305389, "percent_no": 34.13173652694611, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.441683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.422606", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing utility users tax approved by the Fowler voters in 2002 be continued at the current rate of five percent (5%) upon residential users of electricity and gas, three percent (3%) upon commercial, industrial, and agricultural users of electricity and gas, and five percent (5%) of the base service rate upon all users of telephone service in the City of Fowler, as set forth in Ordinance Nos. 1999-06, 2002- 04, and 2006-04?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11675, "fingerprint": "2006|200600462|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600462|FRESNO", "content_hash": "c24de05135b5681c", "measure_id": "200600462", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District be authorized to construct a library media center at Reedley High School, an Elementary School in Reedley, Orange Cove High School music building, student support facilities including cafeterias/multipurpose buildings, make health and safety improvements, provide additional classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and qualify the District for $8,000,000 in State grants by issuing $32,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and NO money for administrator or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4863, "no_votes": 3170, "total_votes": 8033, "percent_yes": 60.5377816506909, "percent_no": 39.4622183493091, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.454886", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.442537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.423149", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District be authorized to construct a library media center at Reedley High School, an Elementary School in Reedley, Orange Cove High School music building, student support facilities including cafeterias/multipurpose buildings, make health and safety improvements, provide additional classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and qualify the District for $8,000,000 in State grants by issuing $32,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and NO money for administrator or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7575, "fingerprint": "2006|200600109|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600109|FRESNO", "content_hash": "8a2fba429499b6a5", "measure_id": "200600109", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including improvements to the Football Bowl, Old Gym, and softball fields; added parking; landscape beautification; upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields and school facilities; Little Theater upgrades and improvements; and other listed projects, shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and sell up to $9,900,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate, with an oversight committee, and no money going for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1374, "no_votes": 911, "total_votes": 2285, "percent_yes": 60.131291028446384, "percent_no": 39.868708971553616, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.440225", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.421704", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including improvements to the Football Bowl, Old Gym, and softball fields; added parking; landscape beautification; upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields and school facilities; Little Theater upgrades and improvements; and other listed projects, shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and sell up to $9,900,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate, with an oversight committee, and no money going for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11674, "fingerprint": "2006|200600460|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600460|FRESNO", "content_hash": "e5c63e585f325578", "measure_id": "200600460", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, arts, music, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler- Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $100 per parcel for 10 years so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56, "no_votes": 149, "total_votes": 205, "percent_yes": 27.31707317073171, "percent_no": 72.6829268292683, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.454435", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.441979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.422788", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, arts, music, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler- Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $100 per parcel for 10 years so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7576, "fingerprint": "2006|200600110|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600110|FRESNO", "content_hash": "e1833e0bab1bfae6", "measure_id": "200600110", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To add classrooms throughout the District,allow the District to access State matching funds, construct a new elementary school, acquire land for a future elementary, middle and high school, repair and upgrade classrooms and facilities, upgrade classroom electrical systems for modern technology, make health and safety improvements, retire facilities debt, shall the Sanger Unified School District issue $30,800,000 of bonds within legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, independent audits and No money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3298, "no_votes": 1799, "total_votes": 5097, "percent_yes": 64.70472827153228, "percent_no": 35.295271728467725, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.440495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.421883", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To add classrooms throughout the District,allow the District to access State matching funds, construct a new elementary school, acquire land for a future elementary, middle and high school, repair and upgrade classrooms and facilities, upgrade classroom electrical systems for modern technology, make health and safety improvements, retire facilities debt, shall the Sanger Unified School District issue $30,800,000 of bonds within legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, independent audits and No money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7580, "fingerprint": "2006|200600461|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600461|FRESNO", "content_hash": "359e000ba75c41f4", "measure_id": "200600461", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms, restrooms and schools, making repairs and improvements to schools throughout the District including science labs, roofing and electrical upgrades, and making the District eligible for approximately $16,000,000 in State matching funds, shall Dinuba Unified School District issue $37,000,000 of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates provided spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee and no money is used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4, "no_votes": 4, "total_votes": 8, "percent_yes": 50.0, "percent_no": 50.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.442248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.422970", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms, restrooms and schools, making repairs and improvements to schools throughout the District including science labs, roofing and electrical upgrades, and making the District eligible for approximately $16,000,000 in State matching funds, shall Dinuba Unified School District issue $37,000,000 of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates provided spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee and no money is used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7581, "fingerprint": "2006|200600464|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600464|FRESNO", "content_hash": "42365a450979fd46", "measure_id": "200600464", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and education facilities at all campuses, including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math and social science classes, upgrading technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and a new Ag Expo/rodeo arena, by issuing up to $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates and qualifying for over $79,000,000 in state matching funds not otherwise available, with annual audits, and a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2699, "no_votes": 2581, "total_votes": 5280, "percent_yes": 51.11742424242425, "percent_no": 48.88257575757575, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.443162", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.423511", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and education facilities at all campuses, including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math and social science classes, upgrading technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and a new Ag Expo/rodeo arena, by issuing up to $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates and qualifying for over $79,000,000 in state matching funds not otherwise available, with annual audits, and a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7582, "fingerprint": "2006|200600023|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600023|GLENN", "content_hash": "f557b14265b245cd", "measure_id": "200600023", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to amend Section 4.12.030 of the Glenn County code to increase from five to ten percent, the tax charged to persons who temporarily rent hotel and motel rooms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2804, "no_votes": 3924, "total_votes": 6728, "percent_yes": 41.67657550535077, "percent_no": 58.32342449464923, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.443431", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.423698", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to amend Section 4.12.030 of the Glenn County code to increase from five to ten percent, the tax charged to persons who temporarily rent hotel and motel rooms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7583, "fingerprint": "2006|200600024|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600024|GLENN", "content_hash": "db001de1ac7b7e25", "measure_id": "200600024", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you support development of an Indian Gaming Casino by the Grindstone Indian Rancheria on non-reservation land within Glenn County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3262, "no_votes": 3650, "total_votes": 6912, "percent_yes": 47.19328703703703, "percent_no": 52.80671296296297, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.443698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.423882", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you support development of an Indian Gaming Casino by the Grindstone Indian Rancheria on non-reservation land within Glenn County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7584, "fingerprint": "2006|200600289|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600289|GLENN", "content_hash": "a99fc886bb7de095", "measure_id": "200600289", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 8 Percent to 10 percent be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 932, "no_votes": 633, "total_votes": 1565, "percent_yes": 59.55271565495208, "percent_no": 40.44728434504792, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.443965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.424060", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 8 Percent to 10 percent be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7585, "fingerprint": "2006|200600465|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600465|GLENN", "content_hash": "d97265f72762998a", "measure_id": "200600465", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 79, "no_votes": 124, "total_votes": 203, "percent_yes": 38.91625615763547, "percent_no": 61.08374384236453, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.444271", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.424244", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7586, "fingerprint": "2006|200600025|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600025|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "e144f8866391f77b", "measure_id": "200600025", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should non-local corporate contributions to elections be prohibited?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20750, "no_votes": 16856, "total_votes": 37606, "percent_yes": 55.17736531404564, "percent_no": 44.82263468595436, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.444573", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.424424", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should non-local corporate contributions to elections be prohibited?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7589, "fingerprint": "2006|200600292|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600292|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "5238cd2caa5f7c05", "measure_id": "200600292", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the current utility users tax for four years, provided that low income families are exempted from the tax, and that annual financial audits are conducted to assure that the general tax is properly collected and used for essential services such as police, fire, street maintenance, and parks and recreation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4438, "no_votes": 4161, "total_votes": 8599, "percent_yes": 51.61065240144202, "percent_no": 48.38934759855798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.445424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.424963", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to continue the current utility users tax for four years, provided that low income families are exempted from the tax, and that annual financial audits are conducted to assure that the general tax is properly collected and used for essential services such as police, fire, street maintenance, and parks and recreation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7588, "fingerprint": "2006|200600291|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600291|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "0baf5aa4b5e37c44", "measure_id": "200600291", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to provide additional revenues to the general fund, a fund that is used to support parks and recreation, public safety, and road programs among other things, shall the City Council of the City of Blue Lake adopt Ordinance 483 which updates the business license fee structure within the City of Blue Lake, a fee structure which has not changed since 1989?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 327, "no_votes": 183, "total_votes": 510, "percent_yes": 64.11764705882354, "percent_no": 35.882352941176464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.445156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.424784", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide additional revenues to the general fund, a fund that is used to support parks and recreation, public safety, and road programs among other things, shall the City Council of the City of Blue Lake adopt Ordinance 483 which updates the business license fee structure within the City of Blue Lake, a fee structure which has not changed since 1989?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7587, "fingerprint": "2006|200600290|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600290|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "5c48f44feb444d44", "measure_id": "200600290", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arcata enact the proposed ordinance entitled \"Initiative To Regulate Additives To Drinking Water In The City Of Arcata\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2567, "no_votes": 4186, "total_votes": 6753, "percent_yes": 38.01273508070487, "percent_no": 61.98726491929513, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.444838", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.424606", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arcata enact the proposed ordinance entitled \"Initiative To Regulate Additives To Drinking Water In The City Of Arcata\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7590, "fingerprint": "2006|200600466|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600466|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "6b61a6a88e84d23b", "measure_id": "200600466", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Fortuna Union Elementary School District Modernize classrooms, including improvements to electrical systems; improvements to classrooms including replacement of windows and cabinetry; replacement of floor and wall coverings; make health and safety improvements including new restrooms; and construct a new middle school by issuing $3,900,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1720, "no_votes": 609, "total_votes": 2329, "percent_yes": 73.8514383855732, "percent_no": 26.148561614426796, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.445692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.425142", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Fortuna Union Elementary School District Modernize classrooms, including improvements to electrical systems; improvements to classrooms including replacement of windows and cabinetry; replacement of floor and wall coverings; make health and safety improvements including new restrooms; and construct a new middle school by issuing $3,900,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7591, "fingerprint": "2006|200600467|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600467|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "746eb2d93160a7a9", "measure_id": "200600467", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Jacoby Creek Charter School District replace temporary portable classrooms with new permanent facilities by issuing $2.5 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits and with citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 678, "no_votes": 787, "total_votes": 1465, "percent_yes": 46.27986348122866, "percent_no": 53.72013651877134, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.445989", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.425324", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Jacoby Creek Charter School District replace temporary portable classrooms with new permanent facilities by issuing $2.5 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits and with citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7592, "fingerprint": "2006|200600059|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600059|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "f3c083216f4ef2f0", "measure_id": "200600059", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1029, which proposes that the tax rate charged to occupants of hotels in the City of Calexico be changed to the rate of ten percent (10%) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1954, "no_votes": 1783, "total_votes": 3737, "percent_yes": 52.28793149585229, "percent_no": 47.71206850414771, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.446289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.425503", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1029, which proposes that the tax rate charged to occupants of hotels in the City of Calexico be changed to the rate of ten percent (10%) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7593, "fingerprint": "2006|200600293|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600293|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "924b482ad100d8e4", "measure_id": "200600293", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To Acquire and construct a new Civic Center/Public Safety Complex and an Alamo River Park and related facilities, shall the City of Holtville incur general obligation bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of not to exceed $5.2 Million?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 381, "no_votes": 539, "total_votes": 920, "percent_yes": 41.41304347826087, "percent_no": 58.58695652173913, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.446563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.425686", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To Acquire and construct a new Civic Center/Public Safety Complex and an Alamo River Park and related facilities, shall the City of Holtville incur general obligation bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of not to exceed $5.2 Million?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7594, "fingerprint": "2006|200600294|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600294|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200600294", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 468, "no_votes": 443, "total_votes": 911, "percent_yes": 51.37211855104281, "percent_no": 48.62788144895719, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.446831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.425867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7595, "fingerprint": "2006|200600026|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600026|INYO", "content_hash": "91b67024a64c232d", "measure_id": "200600026", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Ordinance No. 1110, Transient Occupancy Law Enforcement Support Tax, an ordinance of the county of Inyo, State of California adding section 3.20.200 to the Inyo County Code, to impose an additional transient occupancy tax at the rate of three percent for the purpose of funding law enforcement services provided by the County of Inyo.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2628, "no_votes": 2473, "total_votes": 5101, "percent_yes": 51.5193099392276, "percent_no": 48.4806900607724, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.447097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.426050", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Ordinance No. 1110, Transient Occupancy Law Enforcement Support Tax, an ordinance of the county of Inyo, State of California adding section 3.20.200 to the Inyo County Code, to impose an additional transient occupancy tax at the rate of three percent for the purpose of funding law enforcement services provided by the County of Inyo.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7596, "fingerprint": "2006|200600207|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600207|INYO", "content_hash": "79fc7e47c3c77736", "measure_id": "200600207", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "The Tourist Fair Share Act, an ordinance of the County of Inyo, State of California amending Chapter 3.20 of the Inyo County Code, to increase the transient occupancy tax rate.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3375, "no_votes": 3014, "total_votes": 6389, "percent_yes": 52.82516825794335, "percent_no": 47.17483174205665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.447362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.426226", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The Tourist Fair Share Act, an ordinance of the County of Inyo, State of California amending Chapter 3.20 of the Inyo County Code, to increase the transient occupancy tax rate.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7608, "fingerprint": "2006|200600469|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600469|KERN", "content_hash": "d1d0cad17a86ab33", "measure_id": "200600469", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall James Stephens be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44, "no_votes": 54, "total_votes": 98, "percent_yes": 44.89795918367347, "percent_no": 55.10204081632653, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.451287", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.429444", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall James Stephens be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7601, "fingerprint": "2006|200600115|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600115|KERN", "content_hash": "8e3ebe8d101f2ec3", "measure_id": "200600115", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Sierra Sands Unified School District be authorized to upgrade, renovate, and modernize classrooms and facilities including upgrading plumbing systems, renovating restrooms, making health and safety improvements, repairing and replacing roofs, improving student access to computers and technology, constructing new classrooms, and qualifying the District for over $13,000,000 in State grants by issuing $50,500,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4687, "no_votes": 2976, "total_votes": 7663, "percent_yes": 61.16403497324807, "percent_no": 38.83596502675193, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.449137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.427306", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Sierra Sands Unified School District be authorized to upgrade, renovate, and modernize classrooms and facilities including upgrading plumbing systems, renovating restrooms, making health and safety improvements, repairing and replacing roofs, improving student access to computers and technology, constructing new classrooms, and qualifying the District for over $13,000,000 in State grants by issuing $50,500,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7599, "fingerprint": "2006|200600113|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600113|KERN", "content_hash": "376fbb4ea8cf010c", "measure_id": "200600113", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and renovate classrooms and schools throughout the District and relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms and educational facilities, shall the Beardsley School District issue $10.3 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and can not be transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1444, "no_votes": 939, "total_votes": 2383, "percent_yes": 60.595887536718415, "percent_no": 39.404112463281585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.448525", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.426944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and renovate classrooms and schools throughout the District and relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms and educational facilities, shall the Beardsley School District issue $10.3 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and can not be transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7600, "fingerprint": "2006|200600114|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600114|KERN", "content_hash": "6d03fde8c287d508", "measure_id": "200600114", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, renovate, construct, acquire, and equip classrooms, educational buildings and school campuses throughout the District, and build new classrooms and educational facilities, shall the Fruitvale School District issue $29.8 million of bonds at current interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee and all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2257, "no_votes": 1752, "total_votes": 4009, "percent_yes": 56.29832876028935, "percent_no": 43.70167123971065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.448838", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.427126", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, renovate, construct, acquire, and equip classrooms, educational buildings and school campuses throughout the District, and build new classrooms and educational facilities, shall the Fruitvale School District issue $29.8 million of bonds at current interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee and all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7602, "fingerprint": "2006|200600116|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600116|KERN", "content_hash": "e1db11c5a5e5468c", "measure_id": "200600116", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Standard School District be authorized to upgrade, improve, construct, and modernize classrooms and school facilities including making health and safety improvements, renovating electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology, constructing new classrooms, upgrading restrooms and plumbing systems, and qualifying the District for $3,400,000 in State grants by issuing $28,000,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2166, "no_votes": 1176, "total_votes": 3342, "percent_yes": 64.81149012567326, "percent_no": 35.18850987432674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.449406", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.427486", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Standard School District be authorized to upgrade, improve, construct, and modernize classrooms and school facilities including making health and safety improvements, renovating electrical systems to improve access to computers and technology, constructing new classrooms, upgrading restrooms and plumbing systems, and qualifying the District for $3,400,000 in State grants by issuing $28,000,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11677, "fingerprint": "2006|200600112|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600112|KERN", "content_hash": "433f1f3c0c689a99", "measure_id": "200600112", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To raise educational standards; improve curriculum; acquire, construct and equip two new high schools to reduce overcrowding at Highland, Knight and Palmdale High Schools; upgrade and expand classrooms at Quartz Hill and Eastside High Schools; and add science labs at Lancaster High School, shall Antelope Valley Union High School District issue $177,500,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to maintain strict financial standards and monitor District spending of bond funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 2, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.459146", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.448239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.426766", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To raise educational standards; improve curriculum; acquire, construct and equip two new high schools to reduce overcrowding at Highland, Knight and Palmdale High Schools; upgrade and expand classrooms at Quartz Hill and Eastside High Schools; and add science labs at Lancaster High School, shall Antelope Valley Union High School District issue $177,500,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to maintain strict financial standards and monitor District spending of bond funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7598, "fingerprint": "2006|200600028|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600028|KERN", "content_hash": "d56a45b69ebcf1c1", "measure_id": "200600028", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance prohibiting the land application of biosolids in the unincorporated area of Kern County be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 85011, "no_votes": 17117, "total_votes": 102128, "percent_yes": 83.23966003446655, "percent_no": 16.760339965533447, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.447971", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.426583", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance prohibiting the land application of biosolids in the unincorporated area of Kern County be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7597, "fingerprint": "2006|200600027|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600027|KERN", "content_hash": "ffcc0c85c7f39b31", "measure_id": "200600027", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain public safety, shall the Bear Valley Community Services District continue to operate the gate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, restrict road access to landowners, residents and authorized visitors by levying a special tax of $75 on each parcel of land; with future increases subject to approval by two-thirds of voters in the District and provide annual audits to ensure proper use of the tax revenue?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1322, "no_votes": 555, "total_votes": 1877, "percent_yes": 70.43153969099627, "percent_no": 29.568460309003726, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.447674", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.426404", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain public safety, shall the Bear Valley Community Services District continue to operate the gate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, restrict road access to landowners, residents and authorized visitors by levying a special tax of $75 on each parcel of land; with future increases subject to approval by two-thirds of voters in the District and provide annual audits to ensure proper use of the tax revenue?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7607, "fingerprint": "2006|200600468|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600468|KERN", "content_hash": "df071b655b6d41ff", "measure_id": "200600468", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Bakersfield City School District be authorized to upgrade restrooms and plumbing systems, renovate electrical systems to improve student access to computers/technology, acquire and construct classrooms and new schools to reduce overcrowding, make health, safety, and security improvements, improve facilities and qualify the District for up to $57,000,000 in State grants by issuing $100,000,000 in bonds within legal limits, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17657, "no_votes": 10004, "total_votes": 27661, "percent_yes": 63.833556270561445, "percent_no": 36.166443729438555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.451017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.429164", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Bakersfield City School District be authorized to upgrade restrooms and plumbing systems, renovate electrical systems to improve student access to computers/technology, acquire and construct classrooms and new schools to reduce overcrowding, make health, safety, and security improvements, improve facilities and qualify the District for up to $57,000,000 in State grants by issuing $100,000,000 in bonds within legal limits, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7609, "fingerprint": "2006|200600470|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600470|KERN", "content_hash": "70bcb0b46ce444f2", "measure_id": "200600470", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety and learning in neighborhood schools and qualify for State matching funds, shall Greenfield Union School District upgrade inadequate school roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation, electrical and technology; improve safety /security systems; modernize classrooms/schools; and build three new schools to relieve overcrowding by issuing $40 million of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrative salaries, all funds staying local to improve Greenfield schools and without increasing existing tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3241, "no_votes": 1395, "total_votes": 4636, "percent_yes": 69.90940465918895, "percent_no": 30.09059534081105, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.451555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.429716", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety and learning in neighborhood schools and qualify for State matching funds, shall Greenfield Union School District upgrade inadequate school roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation, electrical and technology; improve safety /security systems; modernize classrooms/schools; and build three new schools to relieve overcrowding by issuing $40 million of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizens oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrative salaries, all funds staying local to improve Greenfield schools and without increasing existing tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7603, "fingerprint": "2006|200600208|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600208|KERN", "content_hash": "042b2b65324a379c", "measure_id": "200600208", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To relieve congestion, improve traffic safety, and match federal and state transportation funding for (1) widening/improving State Routes 14, 46, 58, 99, 178, 202, 223 and 395; (2) fixing potholes, maintaining local roads and synchronizing signals, (3) improving high accident locations and routes to schools, (4) and improving senior/disabled transit; shall Ordinance 06-01 authorizing a half-cent retail sales tax for twenty years be approved, including an Independent Taxpayers Oversight Committee to ensure voter mandates are met?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82299, "no_votes": 63519, "total_votes": 145818, "percent_yes": 56.43953421388306, "percent_no": 43.56046578611694, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.449800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.427894", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve congestion, improve traffic safety, and match federal and state transportation funding for (1) widening/improving State Routes 14, 46, 58, 99, 178, 202, 223 and 395; (2) fixing potholes, maintaining local roads and synchronizing signals, (3) improving high accident locations and routes to schools, (4) and improving senior/disabled transit; shall Ordinance 06-01 authorizing a half-cent retail sales tax for twenty years be approved, including an Independent Taxpayers Oversight Committee to ensure voter mandates are met?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7604, "fingerprint": "2006|200600295|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600295|KERN", "content_hash": "c89727b35fe5cd97", "measure_id": "200600295", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special tax of up to $105.00 per lot or parcel and concurrent raise in the appropriations limit be approved for each of five fiscal years beginning July 1, 2007?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1236, "no_votes": 1305, "total_votes": 2541, "percent_yes": 48.642266824085, "percent_no": 51.357733175915, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.450073", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.428314", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax of up to $105.00 per lot or parcel and concurrent raise in the appropriations limit be approved for each of five fiscal years beginning July 1, 2007?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7605, "fingerprint": "2006|200600296|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600296|KERN", "content_hash": "5a54f438a0903949", "measure_id": "200600296", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be enacted in the City of Delano a temporary sales tax rate increase of one-half of one percent (0.50%) which will end after ten (10) years, the proceeds of which shall be used for improving police and fire services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2095, "no_votes": 1928, "total_votes": 4023, "percent_yes": 52.07556549838429, "percent_no": 47.92443450161571, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.450341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.428596", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be enacted in the City of Delano a temporary sales tax rate increase of one-half of one percent (0.50%) which will end after ten (10) years, the proceeds of which shall be used for improving police and fire services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7606, "fingerprint": "2006|200600297|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600297|KERN", "content_hash": "4b256ae1f3789e21", "measure_id": "200600297", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the transient occupancy tax be increased from 8% to 12%, with the increased revenues to be used solely for the following specific purposes: for promotion of the arts and projects and activities relating to same, for recreational activities and projects, for historic preservation activities and projects, and for educational programs and activities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 861, "no_votes": 1015, "total_votes": 1876, "percent_yes": 45.8955223880597, "percent_no": 54.1044776119403, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.450657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.428886", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the transient occupancy tax be increased from 8% to 12%, with the increased revenues to be used solely for the following specific purposes: for promotion of the arts and projects and activities relating to same, for recreational activities and projects, for historic preservation activities and projects, and for educational programs and activities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7611, "fingerprint": "2006|200600118|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600118|KINGS", "content_hash": "33cfdb3f529890f8", "measure_id": "200600118", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math and social science classes, upgrading electrical systems and technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1973, "no_votes": 1909, "total_votes": 3882, "percent_yes": 50.824317362184445, "percent_no": 49.175682637815555, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.452086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.430276", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math and social science classes, upgrading electrical systems and technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7612, "fingerprint": "2006|200600471|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600471|KINGS", "content_hash": "30a07436bd9144f5", "measure_id": "200600471", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a permanent educational center in Hanford by acquiring, constructing and equipping buildings, sites, libraries, classrooms, science and computer labs, to prepare students for university transfer, skilled jobs, law enforcement, firefighting and vocational programs, shall the College of the Sequoias Community College District issue $22 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8257, "no_votes": 5620, "total_votes": 13877, "percent_yes": 59.50133314116884, "percent_no": 40.49866685883116, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.452437", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.430560", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a permanent educational center in Hanford by acquiring, constructing and equipping buildings, sites, libraries, classrooms, science and computer labs, to prepare students for university transfer, skilled jobs, law enforcement, firefighting and vocational programs, shall the College of the Sequoias Community College District issue $22 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7610, "fingerprint": "2006|200600117|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600117|KINGS", "content_hash": "0bbfccd3546b781e", "measure_id": "200600117", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including improvements to the Football Bowl, Old Gym, and softball fields; added parking; landscape beautification; upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields and school facilities; Little Theater upgrades and improvements; and other listed projects, shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and see up to $9,900,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate, with an oversight committee, and no money going for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58, "no_votes": 74, "total_votes": 132, "percent_yes": 43.93939393939394, "percent_no": 56.06060606060606, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.451821", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.429996", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including improvements to the Football Bowl, Old Gym, and softball fields; added parking; landscape beautification; upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields and school facilities; Little Theater upgrades and improvements; and other listed projects, shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and see up to $9,900,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate, with an oversight committee, and no money going for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7613, "fingerprint": "2006|200600472|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600472|KINGS", "content_hash": "e517845bb6adbcd9", "measure_id": "200600472", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading electrical systems and technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3298, "no_votes": 3101, "total_votes": 6399, "percent_yes": 51.53930301609626, "percent_no": 48.46069698390374, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.452708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.430839", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading electrical systems and technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7620, "fingerprint": "2006|200600475|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600475|LAKE", "content_hash": "addad9362ebd98d4", "measure_id": "200600475", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home; repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs; upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems; repair leaky roofs; improve disabled access; upgrade technology; repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4999, "no_votes": 3394, "total_votes": 8393, "percent_yes": 59.56153937805314, "percent_no": 40.43846062194686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.454697", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.432443", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home; repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs; upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems; repair leaky roofs; improve disabled access; upgrade technology; repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7614, "fingerprint": "2006|200600029|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600029|LAKE", "content_hash": "fdcfbefb256fafd0", "measure_id": "200600029", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City of Clearlake impose a retail transactions and use (sales) tax at the rate of one-half of one percent (0.50%) within the City for a twenty (20) year period to be used for the rehabilitation and maintenance of streets and roads and other transportation services, and shall the appropriations limit for the City of Clearlake for roadway repair and maintenance be increased for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 by the amount of the tax proceeds received by the City during that period?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1260, "no_votes": 881, "total_votes": 2141, "percent_yes": 58.85100420364316, "percent_no": 41.14899579635684, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.452977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.431111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Clearlake impose a retail transactions and use (sales) tax at the rate of one-half of one percent (0.50%) within the City for a twenty (20) year period to be used for the rehabilitation and maintenance of streets and roads and other transportation services, and shall the appropriations limit for the City of Clearlake for roadway repair and maintenance be increased for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 by the amount of the tax proceeds received by the City during that period?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7615, "fingerprint": "2006|200600030|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600030|LAKE", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200600030", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 731, "no_votes": 1329, "total_votes": 2060, "percent_yes": 35.48543689320388, "percent_no": 64.51456310679612, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.453243", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.431393", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7616, "fingerprint": "2006|200600031|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600031|LAKE", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "200600031", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 684, "no_votes": 1364, "total_votes": 2048, "percent_yes": 33.3984375, "percent_no": 66.6015625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.453577", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.431668", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7618, "fingerprint": "2006|200600473|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600473|LAKE", "content_hash": "2ec6d3216d7f58a9", "measure_id": "200600473", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education at Mendocino College by: improving and expanding academic facilities to help students prepare for jobs and transfer to 4-year universities; upgrading computers and technology; building a new library/learning center; expanding facilities for nursing and other vocational programs; and by acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Mendocino-Lake Community College district issue $67.5 million in bonds, at legal rates, and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6160, "no_votes": 3926, "total_votes": 10086, "percent_yes": 61.07475708903431, "percent_no": 38.92524291096569, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.454121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.432066", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education at Mendocino College by: improving and expanding academic facilities to help students prepare for jobs and transfer to 4-year universities; upgrading computers and technology; building a new library/learning center; expanding facilities for nursing and other vocational programs; and by acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Mendocino-Lake Community College district issue $67.5 million in bonds, at legal rates, and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7619, "fingerprint": "2006|200600474|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600474|LAKE", "content_hash": "029637a4b34d3408", "measure_id": "200600474", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Middletown Unified School District repair, modernize and improve aging local schools, including technology and safety upgrades and other improvements; construct, acquire, expand, convert, remodel, replace, furnish and equip school facilities; and help qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $ 15,300,00 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with accountability provided by citizens' oversight and independent audits, and with no funds used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2020, "no_votes": 1001, "total_votes": 3021, "percent_yes": 66.86527639854353, "percent_no": 33.13472360145647, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.454399", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.432256", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Middletown Unified School District repair, modernize and improve aging local schools, including technology and safety upgrades and other improvements; construct, acquire, expand, convert, remodel, replace, furnish and equip school facilities; and help qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $ 15,300,00 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with accountability provided by citizens' oversight and independent audits, and with no funds used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7617, "fingerprint": "2006|200600298|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600298|LAKE", "content_hash": "6c58d5d8b1aa1ba0", "measure_id": "200600298", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the sales tax be increased by one-half percent to provide additional funding for City services, automatically expiring in 20 years; with funds deposited into the General Fund; overseen by an independent citizen's oversight committee; and requiring annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1104, "no_votes": 1797, "total_votes": 2901, "percent_yes": 38.05584281282316, "percent_no": 61.94415718717684, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.453843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.431877", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the sales tax be increased by one-half percent to provide additional funding for City services, automatically expiring in 20 years; with funds deposited into the General Fund; overseen by an independent citizen's oversight committee; and requiring annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7621, "fingerprint": "2006|200600209|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600209|LASSEN", "content_hash": "9ab1db0db007a0e5", "measure_id": "200600209", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special property tax for fire suppression, prevention, rescue and emergency medical services within the West Patton Village Community Services District, in the amounts of $213 per parcel containing one or more residential structures and $319 per parcel containing one or more commercial structures (vacant parcels shall not be subject to the tax), and a corresponding increase in the District's spending limit, as established by District Resolution 04-06, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 177, "no_votes": 103, "total_votes": 280, "percent_yes": 63.21428571428571, "percent_no": 36.78571428571429, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.455035", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.432634", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special property tax for fire suppression, prevention, rescue and emergency medical services within the West Patton Village Community Services District, in the amounts of $213 per parcel containing one or more residential structures and $319 per parcel containing one or more commercial structures (vacant parcels shall not be subject to the tax), and a corresponding increase in the District's spending limit, as established by District Resolution 04-06, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7622, "fingerprint": "2006|200600476|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600476|LASSEN", "content_hash": "4ce71254952031a4", "measure_id": "200600476", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to make essential improvements in existing school facilities and grounds, to acquire certain equipment, construct new additions to existing buildings and to qualify for state funding, shall the Susanville School District be authorized to issue $6,250,000 in bonds, bearing interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit, establish a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent only on these improvements and for no other purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1663, "no_votes": 1532, "total_votes": 3195, "percent_yes": 52.05007824726135, "percent_no": 47.94992175273865, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.455305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.432819", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to make essential improvements in existing school facilities and grounds, to acquire certain equipment, construct new additions to existing buildings and to qualify for state funding, shall the Susanville School District be authorized to issue $6,250,000 in bonds, bearing interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit, establish a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent only on these improvements and for no other purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7624, "fingerprint": "2006|200600012|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600012|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200600012", "measure_letter": "06-K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 413, "no_votes": 379, "total_votes": 792, "percent_yes": 52.14646464646465, "percent_no": 47.85353535353535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.455842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.433180", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7638, "fingerprint": "2006|200600194|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600194|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "467bc3585d3c3ba4", "measure_id": "200600194", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Jay Imperial be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1926, "no_votes": 2729, "total_votes": 4655, "percent_yes": 41.37486573576799, "percent_no": 58.62513426423201, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-09-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.461596", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.436123", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jay Imperial be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7639, "fingerprint": "2006|200600195|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600195|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "eff9d47ab2696c7a", "measure_id": "200600195", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Gary Taylor be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1900, "no_votes": 2679, "total_votes": 4579, "percent_yes": 41.49377593360996, "percent_no": 58.50622406639004, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-09-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.462030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.436308", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Gary Taylor be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11685, "fingerprint": "2006|200600311|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600311|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6cc453838811074d", "measure_id": "200600311", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance providing for the National Football League renovation of the Rose Bowl Stadium for professional football use and for lease of the Rose Bowl Stadium to the National Football League be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9992, "no_votes": 25662, "total_votes": 35654, "percent_yes": 28.02490604139788, "percent_no": 71.97509395860212, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.472037", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.466757", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.438854", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance providing for the National Football League renovation of the Rose Bowl Stadium for professional football use and for lease of the Rose Bowl Stadium to the National Football League be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11680, "fingerprint": "2006|200600197|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600197|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1246a5a7bccec98c", "measure_id": "200600197", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative entitled \"An initiative to allow the development of 338 residential lots on the existing 107-acre Glendora Country Club property and to allow the development of a portion of a new 18-hole golf course and country club on 201 hillside acres situated in northeast Glendora adjacent to the City of San Dimas\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1320, "no_votes": 12176, "total_votes": 13496, "percent_yes": 9.780675755779493, "percent_no": 90.2193242442205, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-10-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.468723", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.462462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.436490", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative entitled \"An initiative to allow the development of 338 residential lots on the existing 107-acre Glendora Country Club property and to allow the development of a portion of a new 18-hole golf course and country club on 201 hillside acres situated in northeast Glendora adjacent to the City of San Dimas\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11679, "fingerprint": "2006|200600121|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600121|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "eb210aaab8cd19f1", "measure_id": "200600121", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To help enhance student safety, and complete pending facilities projects and improve the educational environment by making repairs and improvements to existing schools in the District and providing new school facilities, shall the Hermosa Beach City School District issue up to $13,100,000 of bonds at the lowest available interest rates, extending the existing bond term by not more than 4 years, with spending reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee and no money to be used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1840, "no_votes": 1813, "total_votes": 3653, "percent_yes": 50.369559266356426, "percent_no": 49.630440733643574, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.466613", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.458346", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.434833", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help enhance student safety, and complete pending facilities projects and improve the educational environment by making repairs and improvements to existing schools in the District and providing new school facilities, shall the Hermosa Beach City School District issue up to $13,100,000 of bonds at the lowest available interest rates, extending the existing bond term by not more than 4 years, with spending reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee and no money to be used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11678, "fingerprint": "2006|200600015|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600015|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9375ddda790d113a", "measure_id": "200600015", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 06-1568 be adopted to continue the existing 10% tax that is paid only by guests in hotels and motels and that provides funds for vital City general services, such as public safety, parks and recreation, and street improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2286, "no_votes": 303, "total_votes": 2589, "percent_yes": 88.29663962920047, "percent_no": 11.70336037079953, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.465130", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.456714", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.433720", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 06-1568 be adopted to continue the existing 10% tax that is paid only by guests in hotels and motels and that provides funds for vital City general services, such as public safety, parks and recreation, and street improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7623, "fingerprint": "2006|200600011|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600011|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e65e4125ac1032f7", "measure_id": "200600011", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve public safety, vehicular and pedestrian traffic and ease congestion on Santa Anita Avenue, shall the City of Arcadia cause to be constructed or acquired a grade separation at the intersection of Santa Anita Avenue and the Metropolitan Transit Authority Gold Line Foothill Extension by issuing up to Eight Million ($8,000,000) Dollars of bonds, at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, independent financial audits, and no money for administrator's salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5982, "no_votes": 2333, "total_votes": 8315, "percent_yes": 71.94227300060132, "percent_no": 28.05772699939868, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.455572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.433000", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve public safety, vehicular and pedestrian traffic and ease congestion on Santa Anita Avenue, shall the City of Arcadia cause to be constructed or acquired a grade separation at the intersection of Santa Anita Avenue and the Metropolitan Transit Authority Gold Line Foothill Extension by issuing up to Eight Million ($8,000,000) Dollars of bonds, at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, independent financial audits, and no money for administrator's salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7653, "fingerprint": "2006|200600481|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600481|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8e6d4bd59a5dd112", "measure_id": "200600481", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build and renovate classrooms, including pre-schools, upgrade middle and high school science labs, build new classrooms for fine and performing arts education, replace fire alarm and safety communications systems, improve computer technology, expand school libraries, repair and upgrade outdated gymnasiums and athletic fields, shall Paramount Unified School District issue $100 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, all funds benefiting local schools and no funds going to administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6845, "no_votes": 2388, "total_votes": 9233, "percent_yes": 74.13625040615185, "percent_no": 25.863749593848155, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.470418", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.441222", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build and renovate classrooms, including pre-schools, upgrade middle and high school science labs, build new classrooms for fine and performing arts education, replace fire alarm and safety communications systems, improve computer technology, expand school libraries, repair and upgrade outdated gymnasiums and athletic fields, shall Paramount Unified School District issue $100 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, all funds benefiting local schools and no funds going to administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11686, "fingerprint": "2006|200600312|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600312|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e4b1c4a9bdb25dbc", "measure_id": "200600312", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter, Article XVII - Taxpayer Protection Amendment, be amended to: clarify the duties of public officials who receive a \"personal or campaign advantage\" from recipients of certain public benefits; exempt certain trustees, directors, or officers of specified nonprofit organizations from its provisions; extend its provisions to persons bidding on certain city contracts; and make other technical or administrative changes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19551, "no_votes": 12213, "total_votes": 31764, "percent_yes": 61.550812240272, "percent_no": 38.449187759728, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.472328", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.467029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.439037", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter, Article XVII - Taxpayer Protection Amendment, be amended to: clarify the duties of public officials who receive a \"personal or campaign advantage\" from recipients of certain public benefits; exempt certain trustees, directors, or officers of specified nonprofit organizations from its provisions; extend its provisions to persons bidding on certain city contracts; and make other technical or administrative changes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7627, "fingerprint": "2006|200600060|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600060|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6a88f427945cfec3", "measure_id": "200600060", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 688 be adopted to prohibit the sale and discharge of safe and sane fireworks in the City, to allow City-approved and City-sponsored fireworks displays as exceptions to that prohibition, and to amend the Artesia Municipal Code accordingly?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 629, "no_votes": 714, "total_votes": 1343, "percent_yes": 46.83544303797468, "percent_no": 53.16455696202532, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.456995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.433901", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 688 be adopted to prohibit the sale and discharge of safe and sane fireworks in the City, to allow City-approved and City-sponsored fireworks displays as exceptions to that prohibition, and to amend the Artesia Municipal Code accordingly?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7654, "fingerprint": "2006|200600483|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600483|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f1792e6577b488f8", "measure_id": "200600483", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health, safety, class instruction by repairing, renovating outdated classrooms, bathrooms, plumbing, leaky roofs, computer technology, fire safety equipment; improving handicapped student accessibility; earthquake-retrofitting classrooms; removing asbestos and mold; \r\nupgrading, acquiring, constructing, repairing and equipping classrooms, science labs, local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities; shall Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District issue $268 million of bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22927, "no_votes": 11033, "total_votes": 33960, "percent_yes": 67.51177856301531, "percent_no": 32.48822143698469, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.470985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.441586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health, safety, class instruction by repairing, renovating outdated classrooms, bathrooms, plumbing, leaky roofs, computer technology, fire safety equipment; improving handicapped student accessibility; earthquake-retrofitting classrooms; removing asbestos and mold; \r\nupgrading, acquiring, constructing, repairing and equipping classrooms, science labs, local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities; shall Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District issue $268 million of bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11683, "fingerprint": "2006|200600305|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600305|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "18905c0b8c76cebf", "measure_id": "200600305", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2006-6, which would prohibit the parking of motorized recreational vehicles on streets in the City, except while in the process of being loaded or unloaded or by City permit, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14733, "no_votes": 7059, "total_votes": 21792, "percent_yes": 67.60737885462555, "percent_no": 32.39262114537445, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.470314", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.465040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.437760", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2006-6, which would prohibit the parking of motorized recreational vehicles on streets in the City, except while in the process of being loaded or unloaded or by City permit, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7631, "fingerprint": "2006|200600120|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600120|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "86bca9e46e7e1430", "measure_id": "200600120", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety and learning in neighborhood schools and qualify for State matching funds, shall Covina-Valley Unified School District repair or replace deteriorating plumbing, restrooms, roofs, heating, ventilation, and electrical systems; upgrade classroom technology and computers, construct new library/media centers; and upgrade inadequate classrooms, equipment, school facilities and grounds; by issuing $66,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrative salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Covina-Valley schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5432, "no_votes": 2440, "total_votes": 7872, "percent_yes": 69.0040650406504, "percent_no": 30.995934959349597, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.458078", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.434645", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety and learning in neighborhood schools and qualify for State matching funds, shall Covina-Valley Unified School District repair or replace deteriorating plumbing, restrooms, roofs, heating, ventilation, and electrical systems; upgrade classroom technology and computers, construct new library/media centers; and upgrade inadequate classrooms, equipment, school facilities and grounds; by issuing $66,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrative salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Covina-Valley schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7644, "fingerprint": "2006|200600306|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600306|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7c875ab4f0c10772", "measure_id": "200600306", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2006-4, which would impose a ban on the sale, offer for sale, possession, use or discharge of fireworks, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8654, "no_votes": 13451, "total_votes": 22105, "percent_yes": 39.14951368468672, "percent_no": 60.85048631531328, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.465312", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.437943", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2006-4, which would impose a ban on the sale, offer for sale, possession, use or discharge of fireworks, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11692, "fingerprint": "2006|200600479|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600479|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e9696c4b568780a5", "measure_id": "200600479", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety, security, and learning by repairing and upgrading every school through repairing roofs; upgrading plumbing, heating/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for technology; installing fire detection equipment; providing increased disabled access; equipping classrooms; retiring facility debt; facilitating joint-use projects; and constructing and equipping new school facilities, shall the Bassett Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with guaranteed annual financial audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2844, "no_votes": 1032, "total_votes": 3876, "percent_yes": 73.37461300309597, "percent_no": 26.625386996904027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.474962", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.469878", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.440857", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety, security, and learning by repairing and upgrading every school through repairing roofs; upgrading plumbing, heating/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for technology; installing fire detection equipment; providing increased disabled access; equipping classrooms; retiring facility debt; facilitating joint-use projects; and constructing and equipping new school facilities, shall the Bassett Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with guaranteed annual financial audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7630, "fingerprint": "2006|200600119|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600119|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "433f1f3c0c689a99", "measure_id": "200600119", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To raise educational standards; improve curriculum; acquire, construct and equip two new high schools to reduce overcrowding at Highland, Knight and Palmdale High Schools; upgrade and expand classrooms at Quartz Hill and Eastside High Schools; and add science labs at Lancaster High School, shall Antelope Valley Union High School District issue $177,500,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to maintain strict financial standards and monitor District spending of bond funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15105, "no_votes": 13705, "total_votes": 28810, "percent_yes": 52.42971190558834, "percent_no": 47.57028809441166, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.457812", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.434457", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To raise educational standards; improve curriculum; acquire, construct and equip two new high schools to reduce overcrowding at Highland, Knight and Palmdale High Schools; upgrade and expand classrooms at Quartz Hill and Eastside High Schools; and add science labs at Lancaster High School, shall Antelope Valley Union High School District issue $177,500,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to maintain strict financial standards and monitor District spending of bond funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7645, "fingerprint": "2006|200600307|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600307|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d98d588ef1d887fe", "measure_id": "200600307", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2006-5, which would prohibit the parking of trailers and semi-trailers on streets in the City, except while in the process of being loaded or unloaded or by City permit, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15513, "no_votes": 6351, "total_votes": 21864, "percent_yes": 70.9522502744237, "percent_no": 29.047749725576296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.465675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.438122", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2006-5, which would prohibit the parking of trailers and semi-trailers on streets in the City, except while in the process of being loaded or unloaded or by City permit, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11687, "fingerprint": "2006|200600313|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600313|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0e5b6bd90b49911f", "measure_id": "200600313", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. O-06-1188 continuing the City\u2019s Utility User Tax be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2515, "no_votes": 1800, "total_votes": 4315, "percent_yes": 58.28505214368482, "percent_no": 41.71494785631518, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.472608", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.467306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.439220", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. O-06-1188 continuing the City\u2019s Utility User Tax be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7632, "fingerprint": "2006|200600122|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600122|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9bc12a4ec68553a4", "measure_id": "200600122", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent local schools, repair and upgrade outdated science and technology facilities, classrooms and restrooms, replace aging trailers with modern classrooms, improve fire, security, and emergency systems, update computer and instructional technology, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District issue $128 million of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip our local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6643, "no_votes": 3698, "total_votes": 10341, "percent_yes": 64.23943525771202, "percent_no": 35.76056474228798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.458740", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.435016", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent local schools, repair and upgrade outdated science and technology facilities, classrooms and restrooms, replace aging trailers with modern classrooms, improve fire, security, and emergency systems, update computer and instructional technology, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District issue $128 million of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip our local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7646, "fingerprint": "2006|200600308|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600308|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9dad32b889a8022c", "measure_id": "200600308", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide safe, clean affordable housing for the homeless and those in danger of becoming homeless, such as battered women and their children, veterans, seniors and the disabled; assist first time homebuyers; provide low income working families safe and affordable rental housing; shall the City of Los Angeles issue $1,000,000,000 of bonds, with independent citizen oversight, mandatory annual financial audits, and prosecution for criminal misuse of funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 407375, "no_votes": 240703, "total_votes": 648078, "percent_yes": 62.85894599106897, "percent_no": 37.14105400893103, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.465946", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.438301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe, clean affordable housing for the homeless and those in danger of becoming homeless, such as battered women and their children, veterans, seniors and the disabled; assist first time homebuyers; provide low income working families safe and affordable rental housing; shall the City of Los Angeles issue $1,000,000,000 of bonds, with independent citizen oversight, mandatory annual financial audits, and prosecution for criminal misuse of funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11690, "fingerprint": "2006|200600477|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600477|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4e35a5c424128669", "measure_id": "200600477", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education, retain and attract quality teachers by repairing, upgrading outdated classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, roofing, lighting, electrical systems, libraries; improving safety, security, fire, removal of hazardous materials; improving handicapped student accessibility;  increasing earthquake-safe classrooms; renovating, acquiring, constructing, repairing, equipping classrooms, science labs, neighborhood schools, sites, facilities, shall Arcadia Unified School District issue $218,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits independent oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10104, "no_votes": 4989, "total_votes": 15093, "percent_yes": 66.94494136354602, "percent_no": 33.05505863645398, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.474525", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.469254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.440494", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education, retain and attract quality teachers by repairing, upgrading outdated classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, roofing, lighting, electrical systems, libraries; improving safety, security, fire, removal of hazardous materials; improving handicapped student accessibility;  increasing earthquake-safe classrooms; renovating, acquiring, constructing, repairing, equipping classrooms, science labs, neighborhood schools, sites, facilities, shall Arcadia Unified School District issue $218,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits independent oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7635, "fingerprint": "2006|200600125|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600125|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9df0271a0c1f3cdb", "measure_id": "200600125", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, improve student learning and safety, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Snowline Joint Unified School District construct 2 new elementary schools, a new middle school, and the first phase of a new high school; upgrade security and technology; and repair/upgrade inadequate classrooms and school facilities, equipment and grounds; by issuing $108,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrative salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Snowline schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17, "no_votes": 11, "total_votes": 28, "percent_yes": 60.71428571428571, "percent_no": 39.28571428571429, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.460146", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.435571", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, improve student learning and safety, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Snowline Joint Unified School District construct 2 new elementary schools, a new middle school, and the first phase of a new high school; upgrade security and technology; and repair/upgrade inadequate classrooms and school facilities, equipment and grounds; by issuing $108,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrative salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Snowline schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7629, "fingerprint": "2006|200600062|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600062|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "57b31be481572213", "measure_id": "200600062", "measure_letter": "IB", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to permit the City of Inglewood to apply a preference to assist local businesses in the City\u2019s purchasing and contracting processes, in an amount to be established by the City Council following a noticed public hearing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4543, "no_votes": 3471, "total_votes": 8014, "percent_yes": 56.68829548290491, "percent_no": 43.31170451709509, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.457541", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.434262", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to permit the City of Inglewood to apply a preference to assist local businesses in the City\u2019s purchasing and contracting processes, in an amount to be established by the City Council following a noticed public hearing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7643, "fingerprint": "2006|200600304|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600304|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "036276cc01522bd5", "measure_id": "200600304", "measure_letter": "IT", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance to impose a Vital City Services tax of one-half percent (0.5%) on transactions and uses in the City, with the revenue to provide for the well-being and security of its residents and businesses, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9256, "no_votes": 8547, "total_votes": 17803, "percent_yes": 51.9912374318935, "percent_no": 48.0087625681065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.464764", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.437581", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance to impose a Vital City Services tax of one-half percent (0.5%) on transactions and uses in the City, with the revenue to provide for the well-being and security of its residents and businesses, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7647, "fingerprint": "2006|200600309|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600309|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d088cd134ceb6e29", "measure_id": "200600309", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To lower costs and provide design flexibility for new regional fire stations, shall Proposition F (voter approved November 7, 2000) be changed to allow regional fire stations to be built on one or more sites totaling less than 2 acres, instead of requiring a single 2 +acre site, if the Fire Department decides that the station can be built to fully meet operational needs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 477933, "no_votes": 144074, "total_votes": 622007, "percent_yes": 76.83723816612996, "percent_no": 23.162761833870036, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.466218", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.438486", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To lower costs and provide design flexibility for new regional fire stations, shall Proposition F (voter approved November 7, 2000) be changed to allow regional fire stations to be built on one or more sites totaling less than 2 acres, instead of requiring a single 2 +acre site, if the Fire Department decides that the station can be built to fully meet operational needs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11691, "fingerprint": "2006|200600478|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600478|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "36f345db2eb44d52", "measure_id": "200600478", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health, safety, class instruction by repairing, upgrading outdated classrooms, bathrooms, plumbing, roofs, install fire safety equipment, replace relocatable classrooms and buildings, improve handicapped student accessibility shall Baldwin Park Unified School District issue $75.5 million of bonds at legal rates, renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip classrooms, science labs, neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with guaranteed financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6727, "no_votes": 2608, "total_votes": 9335, "percent_yes": 72.06213176218532, "percent_no": 27.937868237814683, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.474718", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.469528", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.440677", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health, safety, class instruction by repairing, upgrading outdated classrooms, bathrooms, plumbing, roofs, install fire safety equipment, replace relocatable classrooms and buildings, improve handicapped student accessibility shall Baldwin Park Unified School District issue $75.5 million of bonds at legal rates, renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip classrooms, science labs, neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with guaranteed financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7637, "fingerprint": "2006|200600127|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600127|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1400d28c729baf71", "measure_id": "200600127", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Westside Union School District be authorized to improve student access to computers and modern technology, modernize classrooms, construct additional elementary and middle schools, replace portable classrooms with permanent classrooms, improve health and safety, and make the District eligible to receive $21,000,000 in State-grants by issuing $67,500,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4543, "no_votes": 4109, "total_votes": 8652, "percent_yes": 52.508090614886726, "percent_no": 47.491909385113274, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.461038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.435940", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Westside Union School District be authorized to improve student access to computers and modern technology, modernize classrooms, construct additional elementary and middle schools, replace portable classrooms with permanent classrooms, improve health and safety, and make the District eligible to receive $21,000,000 in State-grants by issuing $67,500,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7642, "fingerprint": "2006|200600303|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600303|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1e6d5c3bd420c3ea", "measure_id": "200600303", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To Finance the construction and furnishing of a library benefiting the residents of the City of Diamond Bar, shall Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 of the City of Diamond Bar issue not to exceed $13,100,000 of bonds at legal rates and levy special taxes to finance debt service on the bonds and operating costs of the library and the District, and establish an appropriations limit of $550,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3856, "no_votes": 9363, "total_votes": 13219, "percent_yes": 29.170133898176857, "percent_no": 70.82986610182314, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.464485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.437401", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To Finance the construction and furnishing of a library benefiting the residents of the City of Diamond Bar, shall Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 of the City of Diamond Bar issue not to exceed $13,100,000 of bonds at legal rates and levy special taxes to finance debt service on the bonds and operating costs of the library and the District, and establish an appropriations limit of $550,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11693, "fingerprint": "2006|200600482|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600482|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ebe10caea305b094", "measure_id": "200600482", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve classroom overcrowding, upgrade technology, prepare local students for university transfer/high demand jobs and secure State funds, shall Santa Clarita Community College District repair educational facilities, including nursing, fire fighting, law enforcement classrooms, science/high tech computer labs; upgrade aging plumbing, roofing, electrical, earthquake, safety systems; acquire equipment; construct new educational facilities; by issuing $160 million in bonds, at legal rates with independent citizen oversight with mandatory audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38292, "no_votes": 22827, "total_votes": 61119, "percent_yes": 62.65154861826928, "percent_no": 37.34845138173072, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.475709", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.470698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.441402", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve classroom overcrowding, upgrade technology, prepare local students for university transfer/high demand jobs and secure State funds, shall Santa Clarita Community College District repair educational facilities, including nursing, fire fighting, law enforcement classrooms, science/high tech computer labs; upgrade aging plumbing, roofing, electrical, earthquake, safety systems; acquire equipment; construct new educational facilities; by issuing $160 million in bonds, at legal rates with independent citizen oversight with mandatory audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7633, "fingerprint": "2006|200600123|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600123|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "23c1d626ba5a3b95", "measure_id": "200600123", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and provide quality education, shall Monrovia Unified School District upgrade Monrovia High School classrooms and library facilities to meet current standards and technology needs; upgrade electrical wiring for technology/security systems; install energy efficient classroom heating, cooling, ventilation systems; construct new science classrooms; construct, repair, acquire facilities, and classroom equipment, by issuing $45 million in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed financial audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4301, "no_votes": 2108, "total_votes": 6409, "percent_yes": 67.10875331564988, "percent_no": 32.89124668435012, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.459278", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.435207", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and provide quality education, shall Monrovia Unified School District upgrade Monrovia High School classrooms and library facilities to meet current standards and technology needs; upgrade electrical wiring for technology/security systems; install energy efficient classroom heating, cooling, ventilation systems; construct new science classrooms; construct, repair, acquire facilities, and classroom equipment, by issuing $45 million in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed financial audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7640, "fingerprint": "2006|200600299|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600299|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1c262c11b2008ed2", "measure_id": "200600299", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance of the People of Arcadia amending the Arcadia General Plan to specify a goal of prohibiting signs not commensurate with commercial uses as determined by the Municipal Code (such as off premise advertising sign boards or rooftop signs, or animated signs), and to restrict signs in the areas zoned as mixed use, horse racing, or special use to sign types specifically permitted in commercial zones, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7435, "no_votes": 7336, "total_votes": 14771, "percent_yes": 50.335116105883145, "percent_no": 49.664883894116855, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.462916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.436673", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance of the People of Arcadia amending the Arcadia General Plan to specify a goal of prohibiting signs not commensurate with commercial uses as determined by the Municipal Code (such as off premise advertising sign boards or rooftop signs, or animated signs), and to restrict signs in the areas zoned as mixed use, horse racing, or special use to sign types specifically permitted in commercial zones, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7648, "fingerprint": "2006|200600314|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600314|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1eff9da836cd8777", "measure_id": "200600314", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. O-06-1187 continuing the Special Public Safety Tax for police, paramedic and fire services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3072, "no_votes": 1275, "total_votes": 4347, "percent_yes": 70.66942719116632, "percent_no": 29.33057280883368, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.467575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.439407", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. O-06-1187 continuing the Special Public Safety Tax for police, paramedic and fire services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11681, "fingerprint": "2006|200600300|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600300|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cd1ba93b3616e4a0", "measure_id": "200600300", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance of the People of Arcadia amending Arcadia's Municipal Code to require \"Large Retail Developments\" to provide 100% of the total number of off-street parking spaces free of charge without time limits or validation, except for up to 10% of the total number of off street parking spaces for which fees may be charged or validation allowed for valet parking, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7594, "no_votes": 7286, "total_votes": 14880, "percent_yes": 51.03494623655914, "percent_no": 48.96505376344086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.469202", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.463349", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.436855", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance of the People of Arcadia amending Arcadia's Municipal Code to require \"Large Retail Developments\" to provide 100% of the total number of off-street parking spaces free of charge without time limits or validation, except for up to 10% of the total number of off street parking spaces for which fees may be charged or validation allowed for valet parking, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7628, "fingerprint": "2006|200600061|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600061|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "10f61df8d6e666eb", "measure_id": "200600061", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the EI Monte Public Safety Funding Act of 2006 be adopted, to fund and maintain adequate and essential Public Safety Services, such as police patrols, fire protection and emergency medical response services (including paramedic services), school crossing guards, park safety patrols and code enforcement prosecutions, by establishment of a special public safety tax on real property beginning with Fiscal Year 2006-2007?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4126, "no_votes": 2674, "total_votes": 6800, "percent_yes": 60.6764705882353, "percent_no": 39.3235294117647, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.457265", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.434083", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the EI Monte Public Safety Funding Act of 2006 be adopted, to fund and maintain adequate and essential Public Safety Services, such as police patrols, fire protection and emergency medical response services (including paramedic services), school crossing guards, park safety patrols and code enforcement prosecutions, by establishment of a special public safety tax on real property beginning with Fiscal Year 2006-2007?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7652, "fingerprint": "2006|200600480|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600480|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "561f33736c0a714a", "measure_id": "200600480", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve academic achievement, enhance educational opportunities, and improve community-use school facilities not covered by previous bonds, including mitigating safety hazards and accessibility issues in the 80 year old auditorium and stadium, and constructing a community aquatics complex with additional parking, with all funds used locally, with independent audits and citizens' oversight and NO money for administrator salaries, shall the El Segundo Unified School District issue 19 million dollars in bonds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2909, "no_votes": 2909, "total_votes": 5818, "percent_yes": 50.0, "percent_no": 50.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.470148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.441042", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve academic achievement, enhance educational opportunities, and improve community-use school facilities not covered by previous bonds, including mitigating safety hazards and accessibility issues in the 80 year old auditorium and stadium, and constructing a community aquatics complex with additional parking, with all funds used locally, with independent audits and citizens' oversight and NO money for administrator salaries, shall the El Segundo Unified School District issue 19 million dollars in bonds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11684, "fingerprint": "2006|200600310|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600310|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a76fe6920b5e712d", "measure_id": "200600310", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended and ordinance adopted to: change Councilmember term limits to three terms; restrict lobbyists from making campaign contributions, gifts and becoming commissioners; revise lobbyist registration thresholds; require contractors certify compliance with lobbying laws; extend elected officials' post-employment restrictions; require ethics training; and revise requirements for independent expenditures and campaign communications?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 375433, "no_votes": 255242, "total_votes": 630675, "percent_yes": 59.52875886946526, "percent_no": 40.47124113053474, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.471713", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.466487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.438670", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended and ordinance adopted to: change Councilmember term limits to three terms; restrict lobbyists from making campaign contributions, gifts and becoming commissioners; revise lobbyist registration thresholds; require contractors certify compliance with lobbying laws; extend elected officials' post-employment restrictions; require ethics training; and revise requirements for independent expenditures and campaign communications?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7634, "fingerprint": "2006|200600124|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600124|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b63b61f2a114920f", "measure_id": "200600124", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize all Rowland Unified School District schools; upgrade classrooms, science/computer labs, libraries; address building safety issues including - electrical capacity, deteriorating restrooms/plumbing and HVAC; acquire furniture, equipment, and make necessary improvements and construction to school facilities, shall the District issue $118,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing annual audits, establishing a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee that all money raised benefits local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4775, "no_votes": 1995, "total_votes": 6770, "percent_yes": 70.5317577548006, "percent_no": 29.468242245199406, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.459711", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.435389", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize all Rowland Unified School District schools; upgrade classrooms, science/computer labs, libraries; address building safety issues including - electrical capacity, deteriorating restrooms/plumbing and HVAC; acquire furniture, equipment, and make necessary improvements and construction to school facilities, shall the District issue $118,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing annual audits, establishing a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee that all money raised benefits local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7641, "fingerprint": "2006|200600301|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600301|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "902781af5a14cd51", "measure_id": "200600301", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To expand City protected open space, expand the Claremont Wilderness Park area, preserve the San Gabriel Valley Wildlife Corridor, and protect the area from development in perpetuity, shall the City of Claremont issue $12.5 million of bonds at tax exempt interest rates to purchase the approximately 180 acre area known as Johnson's Pasture?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8747, "no_votes": 3607, "total_votes": 12354, "percent_yes": 70.80297879229398, "percent_no": 29.197021207706015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.463876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.437038", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To expand City protected open space, expand the Claremont Wilderness Park area, preserve the San Gabriel Valley Wildlife Corridor, and protect the area from development in perpetuity, shall the City of Claremont issue $12.5 million of bonds at tax exempt interest rates to purchase the approximately 180 acre area known as Johnson's Pasture?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11682, "fingerprint": "2006|200600302|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600302|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ff0e3836fc6203f0", "measure_id": "200600302", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would reduce the City of Compton's current utility users tax on telecommunication services from 10% to 8.5% and modernize the telecommunications services definitions so that all taxpayers are treated in the same manner?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10069, "no_votes": 1144, "total_votes": 11213, "percent_yes": 89.79755640774101, "percent_no": 10.202443592258987, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.469668", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.464199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.437218", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would reduce the City of Compton's current utility users tax on telecommunication services from 10% to 8.5% and modernize the telecommunications services definitions so that all taxpayers are treated in the same manner?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7636, "fingerprint": "2006|200600126|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600126|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bca027f49e0ee402", "measure_id": "200600126", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To bring all Torrance Unified School District buildings into compliance with current building safety/health codes, repair/renovate existing school facilities, rebuild two existing schools, remove asbestos, upgrade ventilation and fire alarm systems, install wiring for technology in classrooms and libraries, shall Torrance Unified School District issue $280 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12694, "no_votes": 11000, "total_votes": 23694, "percent_yes": 53.57474466109564, "percent_no": 46.42525533890436, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.460584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.435756", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To bring all Torrance Unified School District buildings into compliance with current building safety/health codes, repair/renovate existing school facilities, rebuild two existing schools, remove asbestos, upgrade ventilation and fire alarm systems, install wiring for technology in classrooms and libraries, shall Torrance Unified School District issue $280 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11688, "fingerprint": "2006|200600315|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600315|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "26713858549e82d9", "measure_id": "200600315", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to make it current with best governmental management practices by removing City departmental directors from civil service, changing the advisory roles of some City boards and commissions that deal with hiring of departmental directors, making other related charges concerning promotions and hiring, amending certain provisions concerning the office of City Clerk and by amending some other Charter provisions to remove terms that are no longer legally valid?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18676, "no_votes": 7396, "total_votes": 26072, "percent_yes": 71.63240257747775, "percent_no": 28.367597422522252, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.473154", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.467842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.439588", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to make it current with best governmental management practices by removing City departmental directors from civil service, changing the advisory roles of some City boards and commissions that deal with hiring of departmental directors, making other related charges concerning promotions and hiring, amending certain provisions concerning the office of City Clerk and by amending some other Charter provisions to remove terms that are no longer legally valid?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7626, "fingerprint": "2006|200600014|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600014|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cd29200b96d26b2d", "measure_id": "200600014", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted increasing the number of 4- year terms a person may serve on the Malibu City Council from two to three?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 739, "no_votes": 1911, "total_votes": 2650, "percent_yes": 27.88679245283019, "percent_no": 72.11320754716981, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.456377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.433542", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted increasing the number of 4- year terms a person may serve on the Malibu City Council from two to three?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11689, "fingerprint": "2006|200600316|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600316|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9714abe48e798de9", "measure_id": "200600316", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For the purposes of funding the implementation of a portion of the City of Santa Monica Watershed Management Plan, shall the City of Santa Monica authorize the Clean Beaches and Ocean Parcel Tax, as specifically set forth in the proposed Ordinance that appears in the voter pamphlet, subject to an annual CPI escalator, and subject to audit by a citizen's oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19568, "no_votes": 9630, "total_votes": 29198, "percent_yes": 67.0182889238989, "percent_no": 32.98171107610111, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.473420", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.468110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.439769", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the purposes of funding the implementation of a portion of the City of Santa Monica Watershed Management Plan, shall the City of Santa Monica authorize the Clean Beaches and Ocean Parcel Tax, as specifically set forth in the proposed Ordinance that appears in the voter pamphlet, subject to an annual CPI escalator, and subject to audit by a citizen's oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7625, "fingerprint": "2006|200600013|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600013|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "02e8f68d0e0fc5f3", "measure_id": "200600013", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Revised and Reorganized Charter of the City of Culver City, as set forth in the Proposed Measure, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2541, "no_votes": 2151, "total_votes": 4692, "percent_yes": 54.15601023017903, "percent_no": 45.84398976982097, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.456113", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.433359", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Revised and Reorganized Charter of the City of Culver City, as set forth in the Proposed Measure, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7649, "fingerprint": "2006|200600317|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600317|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8e0c73b9d92fd035", "measure_id": "200600317", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter Article XXII be amended by replacing restrictions against a person giving, and a City official receiving, any campaign contribution, employment, or valuable gift, after the official votes \"yes\" on certain matters benefiting the person, with prohibitions against giving or receiving anything valuable in return for an official decision and against using public office to gain employment, and restrictions on gifts from persons doing business with the City and other gifts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12668, "no_votes": 13821, "total_votes": 26489, "percent_yes": 47.82362490090226, "percent_no": 52.17637509909774, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.468377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.439952", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter Article XXII be amended by replacing restrictions against a person giving, and a City official receiving, any campaign contribution, employment, or valuable gift, after the official votes \"yes\" on certain matters benefiting the person, with prohibitions against giving or receiving anything valuable in return for an official decision and against using public office to gain employment, and restrictions on gifts from persons doing business with the City and other gifts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7655, "fingerprint": "2006|200600484|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600484|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9c7134f128f323f1", "measure_id": "200600484", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education, serve a growing enrollment, and prepare Victor Valley College students for university transfer and high demand jobs, shall Victor Valley Community College District improve campus safety, repair, expand educational facilities, including classrooms for nursing, emergency medical, police, firefighting careers, aging plumbing, ventilating, roofing, electrical, safety systems, acquire sites, equipment, construct new educational facilities, by issuing $338 million in bonds, at legal rates with independent citizen oversight to monitor expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18, "no_votes": 17, "total_votes": 35, "percent_yes": 51.42857142857142, "percent_no": 48.57142857142858, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.471318", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.441789", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education, serve a growing enrollment, and prepare Victor Valley College students for university transfer and high demand jobs, shall Victor Valley Community College District improve campus safety, repair, expand educational facilities, including classrooms for nursing, emergency medical, police, firefighting careers, aging plumbing, ventilating, roofing, electrical, safety systems, acquire sites, equipment, construct new educational facilities, by issuing $338 million in bonds, at legal rates with independent citizen oversight to monitor expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7650, "fingerprint": "2006|200600318|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600318|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1d263cc34ea3fa74", "measure_id": "200600318", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Municipal Code be amended to: state that City police shall make law enforcement related to adult, personal use of marijuana the lowest enforcement priority, unless the use occurs on public property or in conjunction with driving under the influence; require the City Council to effectuate the priority through reporting, grievance and oversight procedures; and require the City Clerk to send annual notice of the priority to federal and state representatives?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18045, "no_votes": 9596, "total_votes": 27641, "percent_yes": 65.28345573604429, "percent_no": 34.71654426395571, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.468647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.440131", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Municipal Code be amended to: state that City police shall make law enforcement related to adult, personal use of marijuana the lowest enforcement priority, unless the use occurs on public property or in conjunction with driving under the influence; require the City Council to effectuate the priority through reporting, grievance and oversight procedures; and require the City Clerk to send annual notice of the priority to federal and state representatives?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7651, "fingerprint": "2006|200600319|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600319|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4620d1a155add45f", "measure_id": "200600319", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure be adopted to amend the Westlake Village General Plan, the Westlake North Specific Plan and Development Agreement 89-002 to allow development of a retail center on Russell Ranch Road within Planning Area C of the Westlake North Specific Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1720, "no_votes": 2199, "total_votes": 3919, "percent_yes": 43.88874712936974, "percent_no": 56.11125287063026, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.468982", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.440314", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure be adopted to amend the Westlake Village General Plan, the Westlake North Specific Plan and Development Agreement 89-002 to allow development of a retail center on Russell Ranch Road within Planning Area C of the Westlake North Specific Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7658, "fingerprint": "2006|200600130|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600130|MADERA", "content_hash": "55fd7658a13c2a94", "measure_id": "200600130", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading electrical systems and technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24, "no_votes": 37, "total_votes": 61, "percent_yes": 39.34426229508196, "percent_no": 60.65573770491804, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.472136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.442337", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading electrical systems and technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7656, "fingerprint": "2006|200600128|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600128|MADERA", "content_hash": "dfc83223e184672d", "measure_id": "200600128", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District repair or replace worn-out roofing, heating, ventilation, air conditioning systems, plumbing and restrooms; modernize classrooms and science labs; construct new classrooms; make other improvements to renovate the District's schools, and become eligible to receive $3,000,000 in State grants by issuing $15,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2213, "no_votes": 1307, "total_votes": 3520, "percent_yes": 62.86931818181818, "percent_no": 37.13068181818182, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.471591", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.441971", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District repair or replace worn-out roofing, heating, ventilation, air conditioning systems, plumbing and restrooms; modernize classrooms and science labs; construct new classrooms; make other improvements to renovate the District's schools, and become eligible to receive $3,000,000 in State grants by issuing $15,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7657, "fingerprint": "2006|200600129|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600129|MADERA", "content_hash": "aa4f145140e36983", "measure_id": "200600129", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To accommodate growing student population by completing Liberty High School, including new science labs, classrooms, constructing, equipping a permanent Ranchos Middle School, upgrading elementary schools, plumbing, restrooms, wiring for computer technology, repairing classrooms, improving safety and handicap accessibility, acquiring sites, shall Golden Valley Unified School District issue $70 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, independent audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1438, "no_votes": 1034, "total_votes": 2472, "percent_yes": 58.17152103559871, "percent_no": 41.82847896440129, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.471870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.442152", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To accommodate growing student population by completing Liberty High School, including new science labs, classrooms, constructing, equipping a permanent Ranchos Middle School, upgrading elementary schools, plumbing, restrooms, wiring for computer technology, repairing classrooms, improving safety and handicap accessibility, acquiring sites, shall Golden Valley Unified School District issue $70 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, independent audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7659, "fingerprint": "2006|200600210|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600210|MADERA", "content_hash": "f2f9f3346c095a27", "measure_id": "200600210", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To: Leverage federal and state matching funds; Maintain, improve, make streets and roads safer (including maintenance districts); Extend Route 41 freeway, construct passing lanes; Improve Avenue 12, Gateway, Cleveland, Route 99/233 interchange; Improve access to schools , hospitals, farm to market operations; Increase senior and disabled transportation; Provide citizen oversight; Generate jobs to support local economy; Shall voters approve the Transportation Investment Plan authorizing a 20-year half-cent sales tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21515, "no_votes": 7901, "total_votes": 29416, "percent_yes": 73.14046777264073, "percent_no": 26.859532227359267, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.472405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.442519", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To: Leverage federal and state matching funds; Maintain, improve, make streets and roads safer (including maintenance districts); Extend Route 41 freeway, construct passing lanes; Improve Avenue 12, Gateway, Cleveland, Route 99/233 interchange; Improve access to schools , hospitals, farm to market operations; Increase senior and disabled transportation; Provide citizen oversight; Generate jobs to support local economy; Shall voters approve the Transportation Investment Plan authorizing a 20-year half-cent sales tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7661, "fingerprint": "2006|200600485|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600485|MADERA", "content_hash": "dcdf7c0bc79506f8", "measure_id": "200600485", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the overall quality of public education, expand neighborhood schools, maintain a safe learning environment, ensure small class sizes and provide more personal attention from teachers, shall the Madera Unified School District renovate, acquire and construct additional classrooms and school buildings by issuing $32.5 million in bonds with citizen oversight, independent annual audits, and no money for school administrator's salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6812, "no_votes": 4432, "total_votes": 11244, "percent_yes": 60.58342226965493, "percent_no": 39.41657773034507, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.473003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.442891", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the overall quality of public education, expand neighborhood schools, maintain a safe learning environment, ensure small class sizes and provide more personal attention from teachers, shall the Madera Unified School District renovate, acquire and construct additional classrooms and school buildings by issuing $32.5 million in bonds with citizen oversight, independent annual audits, and no money for school administrator's salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7660, "fingerprint": "2006|200600211|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600211|MADERA", "content_hash": "22190c74101f7751", "measure_id": "200600211", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County's Civil Service System Ordinance Chapter 2.54 be amended to delete obsolete sections and language and make additions necessary to comply with State and Federal Employment laws and regulations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18926, "no_votes": 8292, "total_votes": 27218, "percent_yes": 69.53486663237564, "percent_no": 30.46513336762436, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.472735", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.442711", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County's Civil Service System Ordinance Chapter 2.54 be amended to delete obsolete sections and language and make additions necessary to comply with State and Federal Employment laws and regulations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7662, "fingerprint": "2006|200600486|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600486|MADERA", "content_hash": "ab136c6e4618a2b7", "measure_id": "200600486", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses, including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, building an Ag Expo and rodeo center, and relocating the Coalinga campus farm by issuing up to $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates and qualifying for over $79,000,000 in state matching funds not otherwise available, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41, "no_votes": 65, "total_votes": 106, "percent_yes": 38.67924528301887, "percent_no": 61.32075471698113, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.473279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.443074", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses, including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, building an Ag Expo and rodeo center, and relocating the Coalinga campus farm by issuing up to $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates and qualifying for over $79,000,000 in state matching funds not otherwise available, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11695, "fingerprint": "2006|200600487|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600487|MARIN", "content_hash": "76a3e5c8ca4e81e7", "measure_id": "200600487", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $151.82 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 4%, for no more than six years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1586, "no_votes": 369, "total_votes": 1955, "percent_yes": 81.12531969309464, "percent_no": 18.87468030690536, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.480569", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.478251", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.445985", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $151.82 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 4%, for no more than six years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7664, "fingerprint": "2006|200600132|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600132|MARIN", "content_hash": "fe3a67a290d24eec", "measure_id": "200600132", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funding to complete a District-wide facility modernization program, including technology upgrades and classroom renovation and reconstruction, and bring all facilities up to District standards, shall the Tamalpais Union High School District be authorized to issue $79.92 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to improve school sites as specified in the District's Bond Project List, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23420, "no_votes": 11600, "total_votes": 35020, "percent_yes": 66.87607081667618, "percent_no": 33.123929183323824, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.473879", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.443436", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding to complete a District-wide facility modernization program, including technology upgrades and classroom renovation and reconstruction, and bring all facilities up to District standards, shall the Tamalpais Union High School District be authorized to issue $79.92 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to improve school sites as specified in the District's Bond Project List, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11694, "fingerprint": "2006|200600320|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600320|MARIN", "content_hash": "745d2e28766bc421", "measure_id": "200600320", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Town of Corte Madera voters adopt an ordinance continuing a special tax for four more years for paramedic and/or emergency medical services at a rate of $45.00 per residence and $45.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal year 2007-2008, increasing $5.00 yearly to $60.00 per residence and $60.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses in 2010-2011, and increasing the appropriations limit by the tax proceeds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2908, "no_votes": 1066, "total_votes": 3974, "percent_yes": 73.17564167086059, "percent_no": 26.824358329139415, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.479104", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.476242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.444723", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Town of Corte Madera voters adopt an ordinance continuing a special tax for four more years for paramedic and/or emergency medical services at a rate of $45.00 per residence and $45.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal year 2007-2008, increasing $5.00 yearly to $60.00 per residence and $60.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses in 2010-2011, and increasing the appropriations limit by the tax proceeds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7663, "fingerprint": "2006|200600131|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600131|MARIN", "content_hash": "2fa34c4db1bd1a70", "measure_id": "200600131", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide financing for improvements to elementary classrooms and other facilities at Ross School (many 60+ years old), including (1) mitigating flood risk, (2) meeting current earthquake safety codes, (3) rectifying substandard heating, ventilation, plumbing, roofing and electrical systems, and (4) providing energy efficiency, shall Ross Elementary School District be authorized to issue bonds up to $15,000,000 at interest rates within the legal limit, with a citizens' oversight committee to monitor bond expenditures and review financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 976, "no_votes": 261, "total_votes": 1237, "percent_yes": 78.90056588520615, "percent_no": 21.09943411479385, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.473600", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.443256", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide financing for improvements to elementary classrooms and other facilities at Ross School (many 60+ years old), including (1) mitigating flood risk, (2) meeting current earthquake safety codes, (3) rectifying substandard heating, ventilation, plumbing, roofing and electrical systems, and (4) providing energy efficiency, shall Ross Elementary School District be authorized to issue bonds up to $15,000,000 at interest rates within the legal limit, with a citizens' oversight committee to monitor bond expenditures and review financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7670, "fingerprint": "2006|200600321|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600321|MARIN", "content_hash": "7212aaa81f681b52", "measure_id": "200600321", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall there be a special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $39 increasing by $3.00 per year not to exceed $48 for each living unit, and in the amount of $39 increasing by $3.00 per year per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in nonresidential use with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2764, "no_votes": 868, "total_votes": 3632, "percent_yes": 76.10132158590308, "percent_no": 23.89867841409692, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.476540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.444905", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall there be a special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $39 increasing by $3.00 per year not to exceed $48 for each living unit, and in the amount of $39 increasing by $3.00 per year per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in nonresidential use with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7671, "fingerprint": "2006|200600322|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600322|MARIN", "content_hash": "1572643003a568b4", "measure_id": "200600322", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a resolution be approved to increase the special tax for paramedic services for an additional four years to a maximum amount of $48 (.50 cents County fee) per residential unit in the fourth year, and $48 (.50 cents County fee) per 1500 square feet of commercial in the fourth year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4018, "no_votes": 1396, "total_votes": 5414, "percent_yes": 74.21499815293683, "percent_no": 25.78500184706317, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.476814", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.445084", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a resolution be approved to increase the special tax for paramedic services for an additional four years to a maximum amount of $48 (.50 cents County fee) per residential unit in the fourth year, and $48 (.50 cents County fee) per 1500 square feet of commercial in the fourth year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7672, "fingerprint": "2006|200600323|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600323|MARIN", "content_hash": "c51d831378bd4fc7", "measure_id": "200600323", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the special tax be levied within the City of Mill Valley Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Municipal Services) to pay costs of facilities and services (including maintenance, repair and improvement of streets and storm drains, landslide repairs, and fire suppression activities) and shall the appropriations limit be established, all as specified in Mill Valley City Council Resolution No. 06-30?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4950, "no_votes": 1545, "total_votes": 6495, "percent_yes": 76.21247113163973, "percent_no": 23.78752886836027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.477084", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.445262", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the special tax be levied within the City of Mill Valley Community Facilities District No. 2006-1 (Municipal Services) to pay costs of facilities and services (including maintenance, repair and improvement of streets and storm drains, landslide repairs, and fire suppression activities) and shall the appropriations limit be established, all as specified in Mill Valley City Council Resolution No. 06-30?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7673, "fingerprint": "2006|200600324|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600324|MARIN", "content_hash": "9b66ae086b90c736", "measure_id": "200600324", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall there be a special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $39.00 increasing by $3.00 per year not to exceed $48.00 for each living unit, and in the amount of $39.00 increasing by $3.00 per year per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in non-residential use with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 970, "no_votes": 222, "total_votes": 1192, "percent_yes": 81.3758389261745, "percent_no": 18.624161073825505, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.477353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.445440", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall there be a special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $39.00 increasing by $3.00 per year not to exceed $48.00 for each living unit, and in the amount of $39.00 increasing by $3.00 per year per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in non-residential use with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7674, "fingerprint": "2006|200600325|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600325|MARIN", "content_hash": "7212aaa81f681b52", "measure_id": "200600325", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall there be a special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $39 increasing by $3.00 per year not to exceed $48 for each living unit, and in the amount of $39 increasing by $3.00 per year per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in nonresidential use with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4522, "no_votes": 1288, "total_votes": 5810, "percent_yes": 77.83132530120483, "percent_no": 22.168674698795172, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.477625", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.445619", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall there be a special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $39 increasing by $3.00 per year not to exceed $48 for each living unit, and in the amount of $39 increasing by $3.00 per year per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in nonresidential use with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7666, "fingerprint": "2006|200600212|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600212|MARIN", "content_hash": "9e540444fa9cb484", "measure_id": "200600212", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall Ordinance No. 3458 be approved effective July 1, 2007, increasing the maximum special tax for paramedic services from a maximum of $61.00 to a maximum of $85.00 per year for each living unit, and from eight cents ($0.08) to eleven cents ($0.11) per square foot of structure of each non-residential structure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 794, "no_votes": 92, "total_votes": 886, "percent_yes": 89.61625282167043, "percent_no": 10.383747178329571, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.474683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.443892", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall Ordinance No. 3458 be approved effective July 1, 2007, increasing the maximum special tax for paramedic services from a maximum of $61.00 to a maximum of $85.00 per year for each living unit, and from eight cents ($0.08) to eleven cents ($0.11) per square foot of structure of each non-residential structure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7667, "fingerprint": "2006|200600213|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600213|MARIN", "content_hash": "413416a04b5421be", "measure_id": "200600213", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall Ordinance No. 3459 be approved effective July 1, 2007, increasing the maximum special tax for paramedic services from a maximum of $61.00 to a maximum of $85.00 per year for each living unit, and from eight cents ($0.08) to eleven cents ($0.11) per square foot of structure of each non-residential structure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1905, "no_votes": 662, "total_votes": 2567, "percent_yes": 74.21114141020647, "percent_no": 25.788858589793534, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.475136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.444072", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall Ordinance No. 3459 be approved effective July 1, 2007, increasing the maximum special tax for paramedic services from a maximum of $61.00 to a maximum of $85.00 per year for each living unit, and from eight cents ($0.08) to eleven cents ($0.11) per square foot of structure of each non-residential structure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7668, "fingerprint": "2006|200600214|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600214|MARIN", "content_hash": "0883428e8d9904e0", "measure_id": "200600214", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall Ordinance No. 3457 be approved imposing a special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $39.00 per year increasing by $3.00 per year, not to exceed $48.00 for each living unit, and in the amount of $39.00 increasing by $3.00 per year per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in non-residential use?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 573, "no_votes": 185, "total_votes": 758, "percent_yes": 75.59366754617413, "percent_no": 24.40633245382587, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.475422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.444251", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue emergency paramedic care, shall Ordinance No. 3457 be approved imposing a special tax for paramedic services in the amount of $39.00 per year increasing by $3.00 per year, not to exceed $48.00 for each living unit, and in the amount of $39.00 increasing by $3.00 per year per 1,500 square feet of structure of each developed parcel in non-residential use?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7669, "fingerprint": "2006|200600215|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600215|MARIN", "content_hash": "7596c84ec396ba70", "measure_id": "200600215", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain the current level of paramedic services in Marinwood and keep trained paramedics, shall Ordinance No. 14 be amended to permit phased increases up to $24.00 annually above the current rate on residential units, and up to $.03 per square foot annually above the current rate on non-residential structures; and, shall Marinwood Community Services District's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1521, "no_votes": 615, "total_votes": 2136, "percent_yes": 71.20786516853933, "percent_no": 28.79213483146067, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.475709", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.444431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the current level of paramedic services in Marinwood and keep trained paramedics, shall Ordinance No. 14 be amended to permit phased increases up to $24.00 annually above the current rate on residential units, and up to $.03 per square foot annually above the current rate on non-residential structures; and, shall Marinwood Community Services District's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7675, "fingerprint": "2006|200600326|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600326|MARIN", "content_hash": "f984f6b77315c3e5", "measure_id": "200600326", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect lifesaving paramedic services by maintaining rapid response times, providing advanced heart attack treatment, and keeping trained paramedics on fire engine companies, shall San Rafael Municipal Code Chapter 3.28 be amended to permit phased increases, up to $24.00 above the current rate on residential units, and up to $.03 per square foot above the current rate on non-residential structures; and, shall San Rafael's appropriations limit be correspondingly increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14986, "no_votes": 4116, "total_votes": 19102, "percent_yes": 78.45251806093603, "percent_no": 21.54748193906397, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.477896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.445801", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect lifesaving paramedic services by maintaining rapid response times, providing advanced heart attack treatment, and keeping trained paramedics on fire engine companies, shall San Rafael Municipal Code Chapter 3.28 be amended to permit phased increases, up to $24.00 above the current rate on residential units, and up to $.03 per square foot above the current rate on non-residential structures; and, shall San Rafael's appropriations limit be correspondingly increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7665, "fingerprint": "2006|200600193|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600193|MARIN", "content_hash": "b81230514ae0f54c", "measure_id": "200600193", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Sausalito issue general obligation bonds not to exceed $15,500,000 to build a fire station and police building that meet earthquake safety standards, ensure local emergency services, support modern electrical systems for current technology and an emergency operations center for coordinated emergency response, with all funds used to construct facilities to maintain public safety in Sausalito and subject to an independent citizen's oversight committee and annual audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1986, "no_votes": 464, "total_votes": 2450, "percent_yes": 81.06122448979592, "percent_no": 18.93877551020408, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-08-29", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.474270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.443690", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Sausalito issue general obligation bonds not to exceed $15,500,000 to build a fire station and police building that meet earthquake safety standards, ensure local emergency services, support modern electrical systems for current technology and an emergency operations center for coordinated emergency response, with all funds used to construct facilities to maintain public safety in Sausalito and subject to an independent citizen's oversight committee and annual audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7679, "fingerprint": "2006|200600488|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600488|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "19b5a9e4a97d0bb2", "measure_id": "200600488", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To address the needs of students and the community, shall Mendocino Unified School District issue up to $15.5 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, to rehabilitate and construct needed K-8 facilities, replace and enlarge water main for fire suppression, improve accessibility at the high school, repair damage at the historic downtown Grammar School, and qualify for up to $4 million in state aid, with all projects monitored by an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2327, "no_votes": 954, "total_votes": 3281, "percent_yes": 70.92349893325206, "percent_no": 29.076501066747937, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.479383", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.446711", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address the needs of students and the community, shall Mendocino Unified School District issue up to $15.5 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, to rehabilitate and construct needed K-8 facilities, replace and enlarge water main for fire suppression, improve accessibility at the high school, repair damage at the historic downtown Grammar School, and qualify for up to $4 million in state aid, with all projects monitored by an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7676, "fingerprint": "2006|200600063|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600063|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "f90a7ba420a01bbb", "measure_id": "200600063", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the original system be restored whereby the City Council appoints the mayor from among the five elected City Council members, all of whom serve four year terms, and the practice of the direct election of the mayor for a two year term be eliminated?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1822, "no_votes": 1493, "total_votes": 3315, "percent_yes": 54.96229260935144, "percent_no": 45.03770739064856, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.478539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.446165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the original system be restored whereby the City Council appoints the mayor from among the five elected City Council members, all of whom serve four year terms, and the practice of the direct election of the mayor for a two year term be eliminated?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7680, "fingerprint": "2006|200600489|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600489|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "72f62dd2d55e9831", "measure_id": "200600489", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve education at Mendocino College by: Improving and expanding academic facilities to help students prepare for jobs and transfer to 4-year universities; Upgrading computers and technology; Building a new library/learning center; Expanding facilities for nursing and other vocational programs, and by acquiring, construction, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Mendocino-Lake Community College District issue $67.5 million in bonds, at legal rates, and appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12257, "no_votes": 7163, "total_votes": 19420, "percent_yes": 63.11534500514932, "percent_no": 36.88465499485068, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.479684", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.446891", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve education at Mendocino College by: Improving and expanding academic facilities to help students prepare for jobs and transfer to 4-year universities; Upgrading computers and technology; Building a new library/learning center; Expanding facilities for nursing and other vocational programs, and by acquiring, construction, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Mendocino-Lake Community College District issue $67.5 million in bonds, at legal rates, and appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7678, "fingerprint": "2006|200600327|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600327|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "6e500a767affdf23", "measure_id": "200600327", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ukiah City Code Section 1752 be amended to increase from the current 8% to 10% the City tax imposed on the room rate charged to customers of hotels and motels in the City of Ukiah?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2302, "no_votes": 2014, "total_votes": 4316, "percent_yes": 53.33642261353104, "percent_no": 46.66357738646896, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.479111", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.446525", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ukiah City Code Section 1752 be amended to increase from the current 8% to 10% the City tax imposed on the room rate charged to customers of hotels and motels in the City of Ukiah?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7677, "fingerprint": "2006|200600216|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600216|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "e3069503ef744cd5", "measure_id": "200600216", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the United States end the military occupation of Iraq and bring the troops home now?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19290, "no_votes": 9427, "total_votes": 28717, "percent_yes": 67.17275481422153, "percent_no": 32.827245185778466, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.478842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.446345", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the United States end the military occupation of Iraq and bring the troops home now?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7681, "fingerprint": "2006|200600032|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600032|MERCED", "content_hash": "316557441315f6ed", "measure_id": "200600032", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To relieve traffic congestion, fill potholes, improve safety and air quality by: leveraging state and federal transportation funds; maintaining and improving local streets and rural roads; widening Highway 99 and making improvements to Highways 33, 59, 140 and 165; providing transportation services for seniors and people with disabilities; Shall Merced County voters approve a one-half cent transportation sales tax for 30 years, including creating an independent Taxpayer Watchdog Committee ensuring that voter mandates are met?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14189, "no_votes": 8400, "total_votes": 22589, "percent_yes": 62.8137589092036, "percent_no": 37.1862410907964, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.480088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.447074", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve traffic congestion, fill potholes, improve safety and air quality by: leveraging state and federal transportation funds; maintaining and improving local streets and rural roads; widening Highway 99 and making improvements to Highways 33, 59, 140 and 165; providing transportation services for seniors and people with disabilities; Shall Merced County voters approve a one-half cent transportation sales tax for 30 years, including creating an independent Taxpayer Watchdog Committee ensuring that voter mandates are met?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7682, "fingerprint": "2006|200600133|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600133|MERCED", "content_hash": "b93eb7b6b24eb50d", "measure_id": "200600133", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Weaver Union School District be authorized to construct a new elementary school and additional classrooms to relieve overcrowding, modernize existing school facilities, construct additional restrooms, provide science labs, improve access to computers and technology, make health and safety improvements, and qualify the District for up to $16,500,000 in state grants by issuing $9,800,000 in bonds within legal rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 533, "no_votes": 317, "total_votes": 850, "percent_yes": 62.70588235294118, "percent_no": 37.29411764705882, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.480362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.447254", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Weaver Union School District be authorized to construct a new elementary school and additional classrooms to relieve overcrowding, modernize existing school facilities, construct additional restrooms, provide science labs, improve access to computers and technology, make health and safety improvements, and qualify the District for up to $16,500,000 in state grants by issuing $9,800,000 in bonds within legal rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7684, "fingerprint": "2006|200600328|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600328|MERCED", "content_hash": "b10b2f5e502942ef", "measure_id": "200600328", "measure_letter": "C  1", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of Mayor be: Two (2) years, commencing with the 2006 General Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 791, "no_votes": 411, "total_votes": 1202, "percent_yes": 65.80698835274542, "percent_no": 34.19301164725458, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.480913", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.447625", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of Mayor be: Two (2) years, commencing with the 2006 General Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11696, "fingerprint": "2006|200600329|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600329|MERCED", "content_hash": "bcfcf6b51890d843", "measure_id": "200600329", "measure_letter": "C  2", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of Mayor be:  Four (4) years, commencing with the 206 General Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 531, "no_votes": 543, "total_votes": 1074, "percent_yes": 49.4413407821229, "percent_no": 50.5586592178771, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.483418", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.481203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.447808", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of Mayor be:  Four (4) years, commencing with the 206 General Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7685, "fingerprint": "2006|200600330|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600330|MERCED", "content_hash": "d7c55e2cfea9245c", "measure_id": "200600330", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 3?15?3 of the Code of the City of Livingston be amended, providing \u201cfor the privilege and occupancy in any hotel, each transient is subject to and shall pay a tax in the amount of eleven percent (11%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 522, "no_votes": 798, "total_votes": 1320, "percent_yes": 39.54545454545454, "percent_no": 60.45454545454546, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.481477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.447990", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 3?15?3 of the Code of the City of Livingston be amended, providing \u201cfor the privilege and occupancy in any hotel, each transient is subject to and shall pay a tax in the amount of eleven percent (11%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7686, "fingerprint": "2006|200600490|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600490|MERCED", "content_hash": "e12c2eb4bb7bca53", "measure_id": "200600490", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce crowding at high schools;  construct a new school with vocational training facilities;  build computer, science, and agricultural labs;  construct classrooms, physical education facilities and restrooms at existing schools;  replace portables with permanent classrooms;  and purchase school sites;  shall Merced Union High School District be authorized to issue $104,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits using no funds for administrator or teacher salaries and appoint an independent oversight committee to conduct annual audits of bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14317, "no_votes": 12550, "total_votes": 26867, "percent_yes": 53.28842073919679, "percent_no": 46.71157926080321, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.481757", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.448181", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce crowding at high schools;  construct a new school with vocational training facilities;  build computer, science, and agricultural labs;  construct classrooms, physical education facilities and restrooms at existing schools;  replace portables with permanent classrooms;  and purchase school sites;  shall Merced Union High School District be authorized to issue $104,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits using no funds for administrator or teacher salaries and appoint an independent oversight committee to conduct annual audits of bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7683, "fingerprint": "2006|200600217|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600217|MERCED", "content_hash": "ab3563435f383973", "measure_id": "200600217", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To relieve traffic congestion, fill potholes, improve safety and air quality by:  leveraging state and federal transportation funds;  maintaining and improving local streets and rural roads;  widening Highway 99 and making improvements to Highways 33, 59, 140, 152 and 165;  providing transportation services for seniors and people with disabilities;  Shall Merced County voters approve a one?half cent transportation sales tax for 30 years, including creating an Independent Taxpayer Watchdog Committee ensuring that voter mandates are met?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24950, "no_votes": 16038, "total_votes": 40988, "percent_yes": 60.87147457792524, "percent_no": 39.12852542207476, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.480636", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.447442", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve traffic congestion, fill potholes, improve safety and air quality by:  leveraging state and federal transportation funds;  maintaining and improving local streets and rural roads;  widening Highway 99 and making improvements to Highways 33, 59, 140, 152 and 165;  providing transportation services for seniors and people with disabilities;  Shall Merced County voters approve a one?half cent transportation sales tax for 30 years, including creating an Independent Taxpayer Watchdog Committee ensuring that voter mandates are met?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7687, "fingerprint": "2006|200600491|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600491|MERCED", "content_hash": "4e69f3edded01f84", "measure_id": "200600491", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize the Girls\u2019 Gymnasium, the Performing Arts Building, the Agriculture Building and the Boys\u2019 Gymnasium at Turlock High School, and for other specified modernization projects there and at Roselawn High School, shall the Turlock Unified School District issue $7,725,000 in bonds with lawful interest rates and maturity dates, with annual independent audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee to assure that funds are spent only on the specified school and classroom improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 119, "no_votes": 118, "total_votes": 237, "percent_yes": 50.210970464135016, "percent_no": 49.789029535864984, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.482110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.448366", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize the Girls\u2019 Gymnasium, the Performing Arts Building, the Agriculture Building and the Boys\u2019 Gymnasium at Turlock High School, and for other specified modernization projects there and at Roselawn High School, shall the Turlock Unified School District issue $7,725,000 in bonds with lawful interest rates and maturity dates, with annual independent audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee to assure that funds are spent only on the specified school and classroom improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7688, "fingerprint": "2006|200600492|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600492|MERCED", "content_hash": "500de3f96fec071b", "measure_id": "200600492", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize Brown, Crowell, Cunningham, Julien, Osborn and Wakefield Elementary Schools, Crane Early Learning Center, and Dutcher Middle School, and to develop architectural plans for a future elementary school;  shall Turlock Unified District issue $9,900,000 in School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 bonds with lawful interest rates and maturity dates, with annual independent audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee to assure that funds are spent only on the specified school and classroom improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121, "no_votes": 109, "total_votes": 230, "percent_yes": 52.60869565217391, "percent_no": 47.39130434782609, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.482389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.448562", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize Brown, Crowell, Cunningham, Julien, Osborn and Wakefield Elementary Schools, Crane Early Learning Center, and Dutcher Middle School, and to develop architectural plans for a future elementary school;  shall Turlock Unified District issue $9,900,000 in School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 bonds with lawful interest rates and maturity dates, with annual independent audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee to assure that funds are spent only on the specified school and classroom improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7689, "fingerprint": "2006|200600064|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600064|MODOC", "content_hash": "eec07a23fdf98691", "measure_id": "200600064", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Alturas City Council be authorized to increase the supplemental charge on minimum monthly water rates from $0.50 to $1.50 per meter to fund mosquito abatement in the City of Alturas effective June 15, 2006?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 637, "no_votes": 423, "total_votes": 1060, "percent_yes": 60.09433962264151, "percent_no": 39.90566037735849, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.482668", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.448759", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Alturas City Council be authorized to increase the supplemental charge on minimum monthly water rates from $0.50 to $1.50 per meter to fund mosquito abatement in the City of Alturas effective June 15, 2006?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7690, "fingerprint": "2006|200600331|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600331|MODOC", "content_hash": "dc8d7bb88d1db73a", "measure_id": "200600331", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Alturas City Council be authorized to increase the supplemental charge on minimum monthly water rates from $0.50 to $1.50 per meter to fund mosquito abatement in the City of Alturas effective November 15, 2006 for a period not to extend beyond November 15, 2011 without further approval by the City of Alturas electorate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 763, "no_votes": 270, "total_votes": 1033, "percent_yes": 73.86253630203291, "percent_no": 26.137463697967092, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.483074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.448945", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Alturas City Council be authorized to increase the supplemental charge on minimum monthly water rates from $0.50 to $1.50 per meter to fund mosquito abatement in the City of Alturas effective November 15, 2006 for a period not to extend beyond November 15, 2011 without further approval by the City of Alturas electorate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7693, "fingerprint": "2006|200600332|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600332|MONO", "content_hash": "41f21b54c9845a4f", "measure_id": "200600332", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Mammoth Lakes, upon receipt of grant or other funding for affordable housing, be authorized to construct or acquire up to 250 units of low rent housing pursuant to Article 34 of the Constitution of the State of California?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1054, "no_votes": 528, "total_votes": 1582, "percent_yes": 66.62452591656131, "percent_no": 33.37547408343869, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.483946", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.449494", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Mammoth Lakes, upon receipt of grant or other funding for affordable housing, be authorized to construct or acquire up to 250 units of low rent housing pursuant to Article 34 of the Constitution of the State of California?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7691, "fingerprint": "2006|200600065|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600065|MONO", "content_hash": "715187e052b828a4", "measure_id": "200600065", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance imposing a Transaction and Use Tax, in the amount of one-half of one percent, to be administered by the State Board of Equalization, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 668, "no_votes": 838, "total_votes": 1506, "percent_yes": 44.0, "percent_no": 56.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.483402", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.449132", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance imposing a Transaction and Use Tax, in the amount of one-half of one percent, to be administered by the State Board of Equalization, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7692, "fingerprint": "2006|200600066|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600066|MONO", "content_hash": "de17dee2bc4bf079", "measure_id": "200600066", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate to thirteen percent be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 895, "no_votes": 624, "total_votes": 1519, "percent_yes": 59.0, "percent_no": 41.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.483682", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.449313", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate to thirteen percent be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11699, "fingerprint": "2006|200600493|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600493|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "658df07377ee6f42", "measure_id": "200600493", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "NEIGHBORHOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPAIR AND SAFETY MEASURE, To improve safety, upgrade classrooms, and make repairs at every neighborhood elementary school by: 1.Replacing leaky roofs and outdated electrical wiring; 2.Repairing deteriorating restrooms and plumbing; 3.Upgrading classrooms and computer labs to teach math and science; and 4. Adding new classrooms to existing schools and building new elementary schools to prepare for growing student enrollment. Shall Alisal Union School District issue 90 million dollars in bonds, with independent oversight, annual audits and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3414, "no_votes": 1852, "total_votes": 5266, "percent_yes": 64.83099126471706, "percent_no": 35.169008735282944, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.489864", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.486552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.451151", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEIGHBORHOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPAIR AND SAFETY MEASURE, To improve safety, upgrade classrooms, and make repairs at every neighborhood elementary school by: 1.Replacing leaky roofs and outdated electrical wiring; 2.Repairing deteriorating restrooms and plumbing; 3.Upgrading classrooms and computer labs to teach math and science; and 4. Adding new classrooms to existing schools and building new elementary schools to prepare for growing student enrollment. Shall Alisal Union School District issue 90 million dollars in bonds, with independent oversight, annual audits and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7694, "fingerprint": "2006|200600033|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600033|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "3ab514c766b35e3a", "measure_id": "200600033", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the independent Transportation Agency for Monterey County implement a strategic plan to: 1. Improve safety and traffic flow on Highways 1, 68 and 156; 2. Make Highway 101 safer; 3. Fill potholes and repair roads; 4. Improve local bus service; 5. Expand transportation services for elderly and disabled, and levy a 1/2 of one percent sales tax for 14 years, secure state and federal matching funds, create a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and conduct independent audits of expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31056, "no_votes": 23302, "total_votes": 54358, "percent_yes": 57.132344825048754, "percent_no": 42.867655174951246, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.484265", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.449682", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the independent Transportation Agency for Monterey County implement a strategic plan to: 1. Improve safety and traffic flow on Highways 1, 68 and 156; 2. Make Highway 101 safer; 3. Fill potholes and repair roads; 4. Improve local bus service; 5. Expand transportation services for elderly and disabled, and levy a 1/2 of one percent sales tax for 14 years, secure state and federal matching funds, create a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and conduct independent audits of expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11697, "fingerprint": "2006|200600333|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600333|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "67b34726f218db6b", "measure_id": "200600333", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide funding for Carmel-by-the-Sea general City services, shall an Ordinance amending Sections 5.08.010 and 5.08.020 of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Municipal Code to increase the business license taxes charged to businesses operating within the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1240, "no_votes": 721, "total_votes": 1961, "percent_yes": 63.23304436511984, "percent_no": 36.76695563488016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.489210", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.485988", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.450787", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for Carmel-by-the-Sea general City services, shall an Ordinance amending Sections 5.08.010 and 5.08.020 of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Municipal Code to increase the business license taxes charged to businesses operating within the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7699, "fingerprint": "2006|200600138|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600138|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "1fa57d0721a2f634", "measure_id": "200600138", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 0, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.485683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.450607", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7701, "fingerprint": "2006|200600495|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600495|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a787a77166a35f75", "measure_id": "200600495", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce classroom overcrowding by building a new middle school, improve safety conditions of neighborhood elementary schools, replace relocatable classrooms and to construct, acquire, upgrade and equip classrooms, facilities and sites, shall Santa Rita Union Elementary School District issue $14,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, qualify for State matching funds, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee and enforce strict financial accountability guidelines to guarantee that no bond money used for operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2161, "no_votes": 1576, "total_votes": 3737, "percent_yes": 57.82713406475782, "percent_no": 42.17286593524218, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.487103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.451516", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce classroom overcrowding by building a new middle school, improve safety conditions of neighborhood elementary schools, replace relocatable classrooms and to construct, acquire, upgrade and equip classrooms, facilities and sites, shall Santa Rita Union Elementary School District issue $14,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, qualify for State matching funds, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee and enforce strict financial accountability guidelines to guarantee that no bond money used for operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11698, "fingerprint": "2006|200600334|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600334|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "fd7ce2d49a0508c9", "measure_id": "200600334", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a sales tax rate of one percent (1%), for a period of not more than five (5) years, unless terminated sooner by the City Council, be adopted by the City of Del Rey Oaks, the proceeds of said tax to be utilized for general governmental purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 376, "no_votes": 288, "total_votes": 664, "percent_yes": 56.62650602409639, "percent_no": 43.37349397590361, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.489547", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.486270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.450968", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a sales tax rate of one percent (1%), for a period of not more than five (5) years, unless terminated sooner by the City Council, be adopted by the City of Del Rey Oaks, the proceeds of said tax to be utilized for general governmental purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7696, "fingerprint": "2006|200600135|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600135|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "e9cacfd148fc6b29", "measure_id": "200600135", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and renovate classrooms, schools and educational facilities throughout the District and build new classrooms and educational facilities, including science labs and music rooms, shall Pacific Grove Unified School District issue $42 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee and all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3411, "no_votes": 1789, "total_votes": 5200, "percent_yes": 65.59615384615385, "percent_no": 34.403846153846146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.484843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.450050", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and renovate classrooms, schools and educational facilities throughout the District and build new classrooms and educational facilities, including science labs and music rooms, shall Pacific Grove Unified School District issue $42 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee and all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7698, "fingerprint": "2006|200600137|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600137|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "07bb61b3a8223284", "measure_id": "200600137", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Cuesta college students for skilled jobs and university transfer by, 1. Repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems, 2. Building and modernizing classrooms, science and computer labs, dental hygiene and job training centers, 3. Updating classroom and lab technology, 4. Acquiring facilities/sites and constructing and equipping buildings, classrooms and labs. Shall the San Luis Obispo County Community College District issue $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 79, "no_votes": 52, "total_votes": 131, "percent_yes": 60.30534351145038, "percent_no": 39.69465648854962, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.485377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.450418", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Cuesta college students for skilled jobs and university transfer by, 1. Repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems, 2. Building and modernizing classrooms, science and computer labs, dental hygiene and job training centers, 3. Updating classroom and lab technology, 4. Acquiring facilities/sites and constructing and equipping buildings, classrooms and labs. Shall the San Luis Obispo County Community College District issue $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7697, "fingerprint": "2006|200600136|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600136|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f919ff3558275b72", "measure_id": "200600136", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve high school facilities by replacing deteriorating portable buildings and relieving overcrowded conditions by constructing permanent classrooms and career oriented centers; renovating and properly equipping older classrooms and physical education facilities; and repairing roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems, shall Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent for no other purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21, "no_votes": 14, "total_votes": 35, "percent_yes": 60.0, "percent_no": 40.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.485111", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.450235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve high school facilities by replacing deteriorating portable buildings and relieving overcrowded conditions by constructing permanent classrooms and career oriented centers; renovating and properly equipping older classrooms and physical education facilities; and repairing roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems, shall Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent for no other purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7695, "fingerprint": "2006|200600134|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600134|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "76928bfbed0a87ab", "measure_id": "200600134", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "School Repair Measure. To improve safety conditions of neighborhood schools, replace relocatable classrooms and to construct, acquire, upgrade and equip classrooms, facilities and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $23,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, maintain its Citizen's Oversight Committee and enforce strict financial accountability guidelines to guarantee that no bond money used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 339, "no_votes": 351, "total_votes": 690, "percent_yes": 49.13043478260869, "percent_no": 50.86956521739131, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.484572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.449868", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "School Repair Measure. To improve safety conditions of neighborhood schools, replace relocatable classrooms and to construct, acquire, upgrade and equip classrooms, facilities and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $23,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, maintain its Citizen's Oversight Committee and enforce strict financial accountability guidelines to guarantee that no bond money used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7700, "fingerprint": "2006|200600494|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600494|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f919ff3558275b72", "measure_id": "200600494", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve high school facilities by replacing deteriorating portable buildings and relieving overcrowded conditions by constructing permanent classrooms and career oriented centers; renovating and properly equipping older classrooms and physical education facilities; and repairing roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems, shall Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent for no other purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 65, "percent_yes": 58.46153846153847, "percent_no": 41.53846153846153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.486836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.451335", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve high school facilities by replacing deteriorating portable buildings and relieving overcrowded conditions by constructing permanent classrooms and career oriented centers; renovating and properly equipping older classrooms and physical education facilities; and repairing roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems, shall Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent for no other purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7702, "fingerprint": "2006|200600496|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600496|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a3b51d047a9cffb7", "measure_id": "200600496", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses, including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and a new Ag Expo/rodeo arena, by issuing up to $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates and qualifying for over $79,000,000 in state matching funds not otherwise available, with annual audits, and a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 3, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.487381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.451700", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses, including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and a new Ag Expo/rodeo arena, by issuing up to $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates and qualifying for over $79,000,000 in state matching funds not otherwise available, with annual audits, and a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7703, "fingerprint": "2006|200600034|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600034|NAPA", "content_hash": "1a0f36e10a0458ec", "measure_id": "200600034", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 05-02 be adopted?  (Requires Napa County to do one of the following whenever the Board of Supervisors adopts a new land use restriction: (1) compensate owners of real property for any established decrease in property value resulting from the restriction or (2) eliminate the adverse impact on property value by rescinding or permanently waiving the restriction; or (3) agree with the property owner to a compromise solution.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11572, "no_votes": 20004, "total_votes": 31576, "percent_yes": 36.64808715480111, "percent_no": 63.35191284519889, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.487651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.451889", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 05-02 be adopted?  (Requires Napa County to do one of the following whenever the Board of Supervisors adopts a new land use restriction: (1) compensate owners of real property for any established decrease in property value resulting from the restriction or (2) eliminate the adverse impact on property value by rescinding or permanently waiving the restriction; or (3) agree with the property owner to a compromise solution.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7706, "fingerprint": "2006|200600067|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600067|NAPA", "content_hash": "c5e992cff39e07b0", "measure_id": "200600067", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1052, "no_votes": 357, "total_votes": 1409, "percent_yes": 74.66288147622427, "percent_no": 25.33711852377573, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.488585", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.452444", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7707, "fingerprint": "2006|200600068|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600068|NAPA", "content_hash": "51bc78433c3b3a90", "measure_id": "200600068", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 895, "no_votes": 511, "total_votes": 1406, "percent_yes": 63.65576102418208, "percent_no": 36.34423897581792, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.488849", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.452626", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7708, "fingerprint": "2006|200600069|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600069|NAPA", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "200600069", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 493, "no_votes": 907, "total_votes": 1400, "percent_yes": 35.21428571428571, "percent_no": 64.78571428571429, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.489112", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.452810", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7710, "fingerprint": "2006|200600335|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600335|NAPA", "content_hash": "bc70f16a46ff7ba1", "measure_id": "200600335", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit set pursuant to Article 13B of the California Constitution be raised by the sum of $900,000 additional funds each year for a four year period commencing with the fiscal year 2007/08?  The additional funds to be expended are funds collected through taxes presently in effect and no present tax rates are to be increased.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 872, "no_votes": 422, "total_votes": 1294, "percent_yes": 67.38794435857805, "percent_no": 32.61205564142195, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.489667", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.453172", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit set pursuant to Article 13B of the California Constitution be raised by the sum of $900,000 additional funds each year for a four year period commencing with the fiscal year 2007/08?  The additional funds to be expended are funds collected through taxes presently in effect and no present tax rates are to be increased.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7711, "fingerprint": "2006|200600497|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600497|NAPA", "content_hash": "e2519daefa296bd2", "measure_id": "200600497", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve school facilities and safety conditions, reduce school overcrowding, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Napa Valley Unified School District issue $183,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with annual financial audits and independent citizen's oversight, for purposes including: constructing a new high school; constructing new classrooms; improving disabled access; creating science classrooms and improving classroom technology; expanding New Technology High School, including computer labs; improving earthquake safety at athletic facilities; enhancing school security?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20831, "no_votes": 13484, "total_votes": 34315, "percent_yes": 60.70523094856477, "percent_no": 39.29476905143523, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.490109", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.453353", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve school facilities and safety conditions, reduce school overcrowding, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Napa Valley Unified School District issue $183,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with annual financial audits and independent citizen's oversight, for purposes including: constructing a new high school; constructing new classrooms; improving disabled access; creating science classrooms and improving classroom technology; expanding New Technology High School, including computer labs; improving earthquake safety at athletic facilities; enhancing school security?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7704, "fingerprint": "2006|200600035|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600035|NAPA", "content_hash": "dd81308554124119", "measure_id": "200600035", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure H (Ordinance 06-01) be adopted to relieve traffic congestion and improve safety by: widening Jamieson Canyon to four lanes with concrete barriers; building interchanges on Highway 29 at Airport and Soscol; fixing potholes on city streets/county roads; improving safety at high accident locations; providing special transit services for seniors/disabled persons; requiring annual audits by independent citizens committee insuring voter mandates are met by imposing a 1/2\u00a2 sales tax for 30 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16927, "no_votes": 15224, "total_votes": 32151, "percent_yes": 52.64844017293397, "percent_no": 47.35155982706603, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.488015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.452073", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure H (Ordinance 06-01) be adopted to relieve traffic congestion and improve safety by: widening Jamieson Canyon to four lanes with concrete barriers; building interchanges on Highway 29 at Airport and Soscol; fixing potholes on city streets/county roads; improving safety at high accident locations; providing special transit services for seniors/disabled persons; requiring annual audits by independent citizens committee insuring voter mandates are met by imposing a 1/2\u00a2 sales tax for 30 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7709, "fingerprint": "2006|200600218|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600218|NAPA", "content_hash": "ab0d22f9dbb51598", "measure_id": "200600218", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Napa County Regional Park and Open Space District be created and established to improve the quality of life of Napa County residents by: providing safe parks, trails and outdoor recreational opportunities; preserving, restoring and enhancing natural areas, water quality and historic resources; conserving wildlife; protecting agricultural watershed lands; and reducing wildfire risk; using voluntary agreements and partnerships, without utilizing eminent domain or regulatory authority over land not owned or managed by the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22323, "no_votes": 18906, "total_votes": 41229, "percent_yes": 54.14392781779816, "percent_no": 45.85607218220184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.489377", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.452990", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Napa County Regional Park and Open Space District be created and established to improve the quality of life of Napa County residents by: providing safe parks, trails and outdoor recreational opportunities; preserving, restoring and enhancing natural areas, water quality and historic resources; conserving wildlife; protecting agricultural watershed lands; and reducing wildfire risk; using voluntary agreements and partnerships, without utilizing eminent domain or regulatory authority over land not owned or managed by the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7705, "fingerprint": "2006|200600036|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600036|NAPA", "content_hash": "451fe880d1064149", "measure_id": "200600036", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 05-01 be adopted?  (Requires each County Supervisor to read and understand each ordinance, regulation or resolution he/she votes to adopt and to certify in writing that he/she has thoroughly read the ordinance, regulation or resolution and thoroughly understands the impacts the ordinance, regulation or resolution may have on the citizens of Napa County.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17411, "no_votes": 13776, "total_votes": 31187, "percent_yes": 55.82774874146279, "percent_no": 44.17225125853721, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.488313", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.452264", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 05-01 be adopted?  (Requires each County Supervisor to read and understand each ordinance, regulation or resolution he/she votes to adopt and to certify in writing that he/she has thoroughly read the ordinance, regulation or resolution and thoroughly understands the impacts the ordinance, regulation or resolution may have on the citizens of Napa County.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7713, "fingerprint": "2006|200600337|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600337|NEVADA", "content_hash": "46dadce9882d22f1", "measure_id": "200600337", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a one half cent per one dollar retail transactions and use tax (sales tax) be imposed and collected within the City of Nevada City for a period of sixteen (16) years to be used exclusively for the purpose of improvement and maintenance of all of Nevada City's streets, including sidewalks, pathways and street drainage with all expenditures subject to audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1165, "no_votes": 277, "total_votes": 1442, "percent_yes": 80.79056865464632, "percent_no": 19.20943134535368, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.491003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.453727", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a one half cent per one dollar retail transactions and use tax (sales tax) be imposed and collected within the City of Nevada City for a period of sixteen (16) years to be used exclusively for the purpose of improvement and maintenance of all of Nevada City's streets, including sidewalks, pathways and street drainage with all expenditures subject to audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7712, "fingerprint": "2006|200600336|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600336|NEVADA", "content_hash": "750335315bfe15c6", "measure_id": "200600336", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Grass Valley's Transportation Improvement Measure.  To provide funding to complete the Dorsey Drive Interchange; improve Traffic Safety and resurface City Streets; develop the Wolf Creek Parkway, a Downtown Parking Plaza, Bicycle/Pedestrian Paths, Sidewalk and Transit improvements; shall the sales tax in the City of Grass Valley be increased by one-half of a cent (0.50%) for twenty (20) years with proceeds being deposited in a special fund with annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2342, "no_votes": 1740, "total_votes": 4082, "percent_yes": 57.37383635472807, "percent_no": 42.62616364527193, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.490415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.453542", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Grass Valley's Transportation Improvement Measure.  To provide funding to complete the Dorsey Drive Interchange; improve Traffic Safety and resurface City Streets; develop the Wolf Creek Parkway, a Downtown Parking Plaza, Bicycle/Pedestrian Paths, Sidewalk and Transit improvements; shall the sales tax in the City of Grass Valley be increased by one-half of a cent (0.50%) for twenty (20) years with proceeds being deposited in a special fund with annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7714, "fingerprint": "2006|200600037|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600037|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4f2608567c4663cc", "measure_id": "200600037", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the County of Orange from exercising the power of eminent domain to acquire property from a private owner, without that owner's consent, when the purpose of the acquisition is to convey the property to another private party, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 294191, "no_votes": 93594, "total_votes": 387785, "percent_yes": 75.86446097708782, "percent_no": 24.135539022912184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.491343", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.453908", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the County of Orange from exercising the power of eminent domain to acquire property from a private owner, without that owner's consent, when the purpose of the acquisition is to convey the property to another private party, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7727, "fingerprint": "2006|200600348|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600348|ORANGE", "content_hash": "49272bdc2fe831fc", "measure_id": "200600348", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Sections 421 and 422 of the Santa Ana charter require that the city follow a competitive contracting and bidding process that ensures maximum quality of goods or services at minimum costs for purchases of services, supplies, materials and equipment. The provisions also contain specific dollar thresholds for formal bidding for both goods and public works contracts, and for contracts which may be approved by the city manager. The proposed amendments retain the requirements for open, competitive contract requirements, but require quarterly public reports of all contracts approved by the city manager in exchange for moving the dollar thresholds for city manager contracts and formal bids from the charter to ordinance. The proposed amendments also set aside a separate section of the charter for public works contracts which requires the city council to adopt limits for formal bidding, and permits the city council to adopt alternate contracting processes for public works projects such as design-build.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19439, "no_votes": 10767, "total_votes": 30206, "percent_yes": 64.3547639541813, "percent_no": 35.645236045818706, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.495788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.456480", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Sections 421 and 422 of the Santa Ana charter require that the city follow a competitive contracting and bidding process that ensures maximum quality of goods or services at minimum costs for purchases of services, supplies, materials and equipment. The provisions also contain specific dollar thresholds for formal bidding for both goods and public works contracts, and for contracts which may be approved by the city manager. The proposed amendments retain the requirements for open, competitive contract requirements, but require quarterly public reports of all contracts approved by the city manager in exchange for moving the dollar thresholds for city manager contracts and formal bids from the charter to ordinance. The proposed amendments also set aside a separate section of the charter for public works contracts which requires the city council to adopt limits for formal bidding, and permits the city council to adopt alternate contracting processes for public works projects such as design-build.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7715, "fingerprint": "2006|200600070|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600070|ORANGE", "content_hash": "7031d5c0d9c61c7d", "measure_id": "200600070", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) This proposed initiative ordinance, to be known as the Yorba Linda Right-to-Vote Amendment, would amend the Yorba Linda General Plan and Zoning Code to require the voter approval, by a majority vote of the electorate, for a Major Amendment to a Planning Policy Document.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6921, "no_votes": 6622, "total_votes": 13543, "percent_yes": 51.10389130916341, "percent_no": 48.89610869083659, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.491701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.454089", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) This proposed initiative ordinance, to be known as the Yorba Linda Right-to-Vote Amendment, would amend the Yorba Linda General Plan and Zoning Code to require the voter approval, by a majority vote of the electorate, for a Major Amendment to a Planning Policy Document.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7728, "fingerprint": "2006|200600349|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600349|ORANGE", "content_hash": "351fe9fa03fc5ed4", "measure_id": "200600349", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Section 401 of the Santa Ana city charter establishes term limits for council members but does not address when a termed-out council member may run again for city council. This amendment will establish an 8 year waiting period before a council member who has been termed-out may run again for city council from any ward. This will not prevent the person from immediately running for mayor.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17814, "no_votes": 12570, "total_votes": 30384, "percent_yes": 58.62954186413902, "percent_no": 41.37045813586098, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.496057", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.456663", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Section 401 of the Santa Ana city charter establishes term limits for council members but does not address when a termed-out council member may run again for city council. This amendment will establish an 8 year waiting period before a council member who has been termed-out may run again for city council from any ward. This will not prevent the person from immediately running for mayor.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7729, "fingerprint": "2006|200600350|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600350|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e8e373bc1d38c85c", "measure_id": "200600350", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Section 901 of the city charter provides that the city council, by majority vote, nominates and appoints persons to the various city boards, commissions and committees. Terms for such seats are tied to city council terms; three to wards 2, 4 & 6, and the remainder to wards 1, 3 & 5. Board and commission members are subject to the same term limits as city council members - two four-year terms. For many years, the city councils have followed a tradition of endorsing nominations from the council member to whose ward the particular commission seat is tied. When the charter was amended to create the directly elected office of mayor with the two-year term, no commensurate change was made for the commission seat which has been tied to that of the mayor. This amendment proposes to add these long-standing traditions into the charter by formally tying commission seats to individual wards, creating on each board or commission a seat to be nominated by the mayor with a two-year term conforming to the mayor's term, and giving each councilmember the right to nominate a candidate to represent that councilmember's ward. Other members of the city council will still have the right to nominate competing candidates for board and commission seats.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17522, "no_votes": 12675, "total_votes": 30197, "percent_yes": 58.025631685266745, "percent_no": 41.974368314733255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.496329", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.456844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Section 901 of the city charter provides that the city council, by majority vote, nominates and appoints persons to the various city boards, commissions and committees. Terms for such seats are tied to city council terms; three to wards 2, 4 & 6, and the remainder to wards 1, 3 & 5. Board and commission members are subject to the same term limits as city council members - two four-year terms. For many years, the city councils have followed a tradition of endorsing nominations from the council member to whose ward the particular commission seat is tied. When the charter was amended to create the directly elected office of mayor with the two-year term, no commensurate change was made for the commission seat which has been tied to that of the mayor. This amendment proposes to add these long-standing traditions into the charter by formally tying commission seats to individual wards, creating on each board or commission a seat to be nominated by the mayor with a two-year term conforming to the mayor's term, and giving each councilmember the right to nominate a candidate to represent that councilmember's ward. Other members of the city council will still have the right to nominate competing candidates for board and commission seats.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7730, "fingerprint": "2006|200600351|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600351|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6084e245b788ef37", "measure_id": "200600351", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Section 901.1 of the charter prohibits board and commission members from serving as local campaign treasurers. This amendment will also prohibit the appointment to boards and commissions of a person who, at the time of appointment, is serving as the treasurer of a local campaign committee. Section 910 of the charter creates the planning commission and confers upon it the responsibility to prepare a comprehensive master plan for the city and a 10 year capital improvement plan. State law has replaced the term \"master plan\" with \"general plan\" and the role of writing the capital improvement plan has been assumed by professional staff. The proposed amendments mirror the planning commission's role as set forth in state law for overseeing updates to the city's general plan and will still require the commission to annually review the city's capital improvement plan for consistency with the general plan. Sections 911 and 912 of the charter address the city's personnel board. Section 911 addresses the qualifications for membership on the board and section 912 describes board's powers, which include hearing appeals of suspensions, demotions and dismissals of city employees. Under section 911, a public employee cannot serve on the board. This amendment will alter that restriction to only prohibit City of Santa Ana employees from serving. This is consistent with the limits on all other boards and commissions. This proposal also amends section 912 to clarify that the board's jurisdiction to review dismissal of city employees is limited to disciplinary dismissals. There are situations such as medical disabilities and lay-offs where an employee is terminated for non-disciplinary reasons, which have been long considered beyond the powers of the board.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17551, "no_votes": 12486, "total_votes": 30037, "percent_yes": 58.43126810267337, "percent_no": 41.56873189732663, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.496667", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.457027", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Section 901.1 of the charter prohibits board and commission members from serving as local campaign treasurers. This amendment will also prohibit the appointment to boards and commissions of a person who, at the time of appointment, is serving as the treasurer of a local campaign committee. Section 910 of the charter creates the planning commission and confers upon it the responsibility to prepare a comprehensive master plan for the city and a 10 year capital improvement plan. State law has replaced the term \"master plan\" with \"general plan\" and the role of writing the capital improvement plan has been assumed by professional staff. The proposed amendments mirror the planning commission's role as set forth in state law for overseeing updates to the city's general plan and will still require the commission to annually review the city's capital improvement plan for consistency with the general plan. Sections 911 and 912 of the charter address the city's personnel board. Section 911 addresses the qualifications for membership on the board and section 912 describes board's powers, which include hearing appeals of suspensions, demotions and dismissals of city employees. Under section 911, a public employee cannot serve on the board. This amendment will alter that restriction to only prohibit City of Santa Ana employees from serving. This is consistent with the limits on all other boards and commissions. This proposal also amends section 912 to clarify that the board's jurisdiction to review dismissal of city employees is limited to disciplinary dismissals. There are situations such as medical disabilities and lay-offs where an employee is terminated for non-disciplinary reasons, which have been long considered beyond the powers of the board.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7732, "fingerprint": "2006|200600353|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600353|ORANGE", "content_hash": "106427d02ec5027f", "measure_id": "200600353", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) This initiative measure amends Section 4333 of the Tustin City Code and requires the City Council, at least every ten years, to competitively bid contracts for the collection and disposal of solid waste and recyclable material according to rules and regulations adopted by the City Council designed to secure the best level of service at the lowest price practicable.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11778, "no_votes": 1545, "total_votes": 13323, "percent_yes": 88.40351272235984, "percent_no": 11.596487277640165, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.497444", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.457397", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) This initiative measure amends Section 4333 of the Tustin City Code and requires the City Council, at least every ten years, to competitively bid contracts for the collection and disposal of solid waste and recyclable material according to rules and regulations adopted by the City Council designed to secure the best level of service at the lowest price practicable.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7733, "fingerprint": "2006|200600354|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600354|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2ffe396dd21eca09", "measure_id": "200600354", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The current City law provides that a person is permanently ineligible to hold office as a member of the City Council if such person has subsequent to January 1, 1998, served on the City Council for two (2) full terms. This measure would change the City's law to state that if a person has served on the City Council for two (2) consecutive full terms, that person is ineligible to hold office as a member of the City Council for the two years following the person's service on the City Council. To become operative, this measure must now be approved by a majority of votes cast on the measure at the November 7, 2006, general municipal election. If you favor allowing persons who have previously served two (2) consecutive full terms on the City Council to be eligible to again serve on the City Council if they have not been on the City Council for two years, you should vote \"yes.\" If you oppose this amendment, you should vote \"no.\" If the measure carries by a majority vote, it will be fully enforceable on a prospective basis only.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1220, "no_votes": 1504, "total_votes": 2724, "percent_yes": 44.7870778267254, "percent_no": 55.2129221732746, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.497753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.457582", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The current City law provides that a person is permanently ineligible to hold office as a member of the City Council if such person has subsequent to January 1, 1998, served on the City Council for two (2) full terms. This measure would change the City's law to state that if a person has served on the City Council for two (2) consecutive full terms, that person is ineligible to hold office as a member of the City Council for the two years following the person's service on the City Council. To become operative, this measure must now be approved by a majority of votes cast on the measure at the November 7, 2006, general municipal election. If you favor allowing persons who have previously served two (2) consecutive full terms on the City Council to be eligible to again serve on the City Council if they have not been on the City Council for two years, you should vote \"yes.\" If you oppose this amendment, you should vote \"no.\" If the measure carries by a majority vote, it will be fully enforceable on a prospective basis only.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7717, "fingerprint": "2006|200600219|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600219|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c5c685b5ea413eef", "measure_id": "200600219", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "This measure would authorize the Orange County Transportation Authority to construct specific transportation improvement and traffic congestion relief projects in Orange County by continuing the existing of one percent retail transaction and use tax for thirty years from the expiration of the current Measure M on April 1, 2011.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 489640, "no_votes": 213250, "total_votes": 702890, "percent_yes": 69.66097113346326, "percent_no": 30.339028866536736, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.492314", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.454454", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "This measure would authorize the Orange County Transportation Authority to construct specific transportation improvement and traffic congestion relief projects in Orange County by continuing the existing of one percent retail transaction and use tax for thirty years from the expiration of the current Measure M on April 1, 2011.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7734, "fingerprint": "2006|200600498|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600498|ORANGE", "content_hash": "11aece21ba326a34", "measure_id": "200600498", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve facilities for job training and university transfer, expand firefighter, nursing, and law enforcement programs, upgrade technology, construct science and fire training facilities, upgrade security and communications systems, repair, acquire, construct, and equip buildings, sites, classrooms, shall Rancho Santiago Community College District issue $393,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, and appoint an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor spending and perform annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48520, "no_votes": 42766, "total_votes": 91286, "percent_yes": 53.1516333282212, "percent_no": 46.8483666717788, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.498027", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.457772", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve facilities for job training and university transfer, expand firefighter, nursing, and law enforcement programs, upgrade technology, construct science and fire training facilities, upgrade security and communications systems, repair, acquire, construct, and equip buildings, sites, classrooms, shall Rancho Santiago Community College District issue $393,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, and appoint an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor spending and perform annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7718, "fingerprint": "2006|200600338|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600338|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6eb38f9d81f8c2f0", "measure_id": "200600338", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "This proposed measure would add new Section 402 to the Charter of the City of Anaheim to prohibit use of the power of eminent domain by the City Council or any City-related agency to acquire property from a private owner, without the consent of such owner, for purposes of conveying such property to another private party for economic development purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43107, "no_votes": 10586, "total_votes": 53693, "percent_yes": 80.28420836980612, "percent_no": 19.715791630193877, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.492587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.454636", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "This proposed measure would add new Section 402 to the Charter of the City of Anaheim to prohibit use of the power of eminent domain by the City Council or any City-related agency to acquire property from a private owner, without the consent of such owner, for purposes of conveying such property to another private party for economic development purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7719, "fingerprint": "2006|200600339|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600339|ORANGE", "content_hash": "978712c6637cb7e3", "measure_id": "200600339", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "This measure would add Section 519 to the Anaheim City Charter to prohibit the City Council or any future City Council from adopting or amending City ordinances, or taking any other actions, which would approve any additional gambling activities or gambling facilities (including but not limited to card clubs and casino-type facilities) in Anaheim unless such new gambling activities or facilities are authorized by a vote of the people of the City at a municipal election. This measure would not prohibit any gambling activities currently permitted in Anaheim under existing City ordinances or state law.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41407, "no_votes": 13466, "total_votes": 54873, "percent_yes": 75.45969784775754, "percent_no": 24.54030215224246, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.492871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.454819", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "This measure would add Section 519 to the Anaheim City Charter to prohibit the City Council or any future City Council from adopting or amending City ordinances, or taking any other actions, which would approve any additional gambling activities or gambling facilities (including but not limited to card clubs and casino-type facilities) in Anaheim unless such new gambling activities or facilities are authorized by a vote of the people of the City at a municipal election. This measure would not prohibit any gambling activities currently permitted in Anaheim under existing City ordinances or state law.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11700, "fingerprint": "2006|200600340|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600340|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9c85acdac4294528", "measure_id": "200600340", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "By State law, the city clerk of any general law city is an elective office unless, following approval by the voters of the city, such office is made appointive. The Office of City Clerk of the City of Brea is presently an elective office, the current term of which is to expire in November of 2008. This measure, if adopted, will make the position of City Clerk an appointed office and the City Manager shall appoint a City Clerk at the expiration of the term of the current elected office and/or on any vacancy in such office thereafter. Such appointed City Clerk will hold office at the pleasure of the City Manager without a specific term.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5632, "no_votes": 5109, "total_votes": 10741, "percent_yes": 52.43459640629364, "percent_no": 47.56540359370636, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.496750", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.493158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.455002", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "By State law, the city clerk of any general law city is an elective office unless, following approval by the voters of the city, such office is made appointive. The Office of City Clerk of the City of Brea is presently an elective office, the current term of which is to expire in November of 2008. This measure, if adopted, will make the position of City Clerk an appointed office and the City Manager shall appoint a City Clerk at the expiration of the term of the current elected office and/or on any vacancy in such office thereafter. Such appointed City Clerk will hold office at the pleasure of the City Manager without a specific term.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7716, "fingerprint": "2006|200600139|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600139|ORANGE", "content_hash": "08bcbf417496c530", "measure_id": "200600139", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize all Rowland Unified School District schools; upgrade classrooms, science/computer labs, libraries; address building safety issues including electrical capacity, deteriorating restrooms/plumbing and HVAC; acquire furniture, equipment, and make necessary improvements and construction to school facilities, shall the District issue $118,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing annual audits, establishing a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee that all money raised benefits local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15, "no_votes": 19, "total_votes": 34, "percent_yes": 44.11764705882353, "percent_no": 55.88235294117647, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.492003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.454273", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize all Rowland Unified School District schools; upgrade classrooms, science/computer labs, libraries; address building safety issues including electrical capacity, deteriorating restrooms/plumbing and HVAC; acquire furniture, equipment, and make necessary improvements and construction to school facilities, shall the District issue $118,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing annual audits, establishing a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee that all money raised benefits local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7720, "fingerprint": "2006|200600341|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600341|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9615b9481761182d", "measure_id": "200600341", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Dana Point Municipal Code Chapter 4.30 (entitled \"Eminent Domain\") prohibits the City and any \"City Affiliated Agency\" from exercising the power of eminent domain to acquire property from any private owner, without the owner's consent, where the purpose of such eminent domain acquisition at the time of the acquisition is the intended conveyance of the property to any other private party, for the conduct of any commercial for-profit activity. As used in Chapter 4.30, a \"City Affiliated Agency\" means the City of Dana Point and/or any other entity possessing the power of eminent domain, the governing board of which is composed of or is solely appointed by the members of the City Council of the City of Dana Point.  If this measure is adopted, then Chapter 4.30 of the Dana Point Municipal Code would be reenacted by the voters. This measure does not alter the substantive provisions of Chapter 4.30. This measure states that it may be amended or repealed only by a vote of the people; as a result, if this measure is adopted then the City Council would be required to obtain voter approval to amend or repeal Chapter 4.30. If this measure is not adopted, the City Council would not be required to obtain voter approval to amend or repeal Chapter 4.30.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9751, "no_votes": 1769, "total_votes": 11520, "percent_yes": 84.64409722222223, "percent_no": 15.355902777777771, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.493541", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.455186", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Dana Point Municipal Code Chapter 4.30 (entitled \"Eminent Domain\") prohibits the City and any \"City Affiliated Agency\" from exercising the power of eminent domain to acquire property from any private owner, without the owner's consent, where the purpose of such eminent domain acquisition at the time of the acquisition is the intended conveyance of the property to any other private party, for the conduct of any commercial for-profit activity. As used in Chapter 4.30, a \"City Affiliated Agency\" means the City of Dana Point and/or any other entity possessing the power of eminent domain, the governing board of which is composed of or is solely appointed by the members of the City Council of the City of Dana Point.  If this measure is adopted, then Chapter 4.30 of the Dana Point Municipal Code would be reenacted by the voters. This measure does not alter the substantive provisions of Chapter 4.30. This measure states that it may be amended or repealed only by a vote of the people; as a result, if this measure is adopted then the City Council would be required to obtain voter approval to amend or repeal Chapter 4.30. If this measure is not adopted, the City Council would not be required to obtain voter approval to amend or repeal Chapter 4.30.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7721, "fingerprint": "2006|200600342|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600342|ORANGE", "content_hash": "3597588ee13e41f0", "measure_id": "200600342", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If approved, this proposed measure would authorize a centrally located senior center building, not to exceed 47,000 square feet, to be placed on a maximum of five acres of an undeveloped 14-acre parcel in the 356-acre Huntington Beach Central Park, generally located west of the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue, between the disc golf course and Shipley Nature Center, following City Council approval of all entitlements and environmental review.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30342, "no_votes": 29033, "total_votes": 59375, "percent_yes": 51.102315789473685, "percent_no": 48.897684210526315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.493870", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.455373", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If approved, this proposed measure would authorize a centrally located senior center building, not to exceed 47,000 square feet, to be placed on a maximum of five acres of an undeveloped 14-acre parcel in the 356-acre Huntington Beach Central Park, generally located west of the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue, between the disc golf course and Shipley Nature Center, following City Council approval of all entitlements and environmental review.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7722, "fingerprint": "2006|200600343|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600343|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fdaee79b1c1beb3b", "measure_id": "200600343", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "A new Hotel/Motel Guest Tax is hereby adopted by this measure. This measure imposes a new tax in the amount of ten percent on persons occupying any hotel or motel within the City on a temporary basis for less than thirty days. The tax is to be collected by hotel and motel operators at the time of rental of rooms and is to be given by operators to the City on a monthly basis. The tax shall be deposited into the City's General Fund and is to be used for general governmental expenses.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5351, "no_votes": 6097, "total_votes": 11448, "percent_yes": 46.741788958770094, "percent_no": 53.258211041229906, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.494173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.455559", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "A new Hotel/Motel Guest Tax is hereby adopted by this measure. This measure imposes a new tax in the amount of ten percent on persons occupying any hotel or motel within the City on a temporary basis for less than thirty days. The tax is to be collected by hotel and motel operators at the time of rental of rooms and is to be given by operators to the City on a monthly basis. The tax shall be deposited into the City's General Fund and is to be used for general governmental expenses.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7723, "fingerprint": "2006|200600344|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600344|ORANGE", "content_hash": "31d6756e4d22a87e", "measure_id": "200600344", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The last update of the City's General Plan was in 1988. The existing General Plan contains specifically described limits on the number of residential units and non-residential square feet to be built in the City. On July 25, 2006, the City Council adopted a comprehensive update of the General Plan and determined that the update constitutes a \"major amendment\" of the General Plan that is required to be sent to the voters for approval under Section 423 of the City Charter, also known as the Greenlight Initiative. A \"yes\" vote would approve the Land Use Map and Land Use Tables included as part of the updated \"Land Use Element\" section of the General Plan. The Land Use Map and Land Use Tables contain specific development limits and designated land uses to be allowed over the twenty-year life of the General Plan. A \"yes\" vote will allow 1,166 more residential dwelling units than the existing General Plan, but will also decrease non-residential development by 449,499 square feet from what the existing General Plan allows.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15750, "no_votes": 13634, "total_votes": 29384, "percent_yes": 53.600598965423366, "percent_no": 46.399401034576634, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.494475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.455744", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The last update of the City's General Plan was in 1988. The existing General Plan contains specifically described limits on the number of residential units and non-residential square feet to be built in the City. On July 25, 2006, the City Council adopted a comprehensive update of the General Plan and determined that the update constitutes a \"major amendment\" of the General Plan that is required to be sent to the voters for approval under Section 423 of the City Charter, also known as the Greenlight Initiative. A \"yes\" vote would approve the Land Use Map and Land Use Tables included as part of the updated \"Land Use Element\" section of the General Plan. The Land Use Map and Land Use Tables contain specific development limits and designated land uses to be allowed over the twenty-year life of the General Plan. A \"yes\" vote will allow 1,166 more residential dwelling units than the existing General Plan, but will also decrease non-residential development by 449,499 square feet from what the existing General Plan allows.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7724, "fingerprint": "2006|200600345|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600345|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a24c9de4122f2f00", "measure_id": "200600345", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "This Measure, if approved, will amend the City Charter to prohibit the City of Newport Beach and/or any City-Affiliated Agency from exercising the power of eminent domain to acquire real property, without the owner's consent, for the sole purpose of transferring the property from one person to another in order to further private economic development. The \"Owner\" of the property is defined as the owner of the fee title interest in the property. A \"City-Affiliated Agency\" is defined as any entity possessing the power of eminent domain, the governing board of which is solely composed of, or is solely appointed by, the members of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22517, "no_votes": 6961, "total_votes": 29478, "percent_yes": 76.38577922518488, "percent_no": 23.614220774815124, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.494853", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.455929", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "This Measure, if approved, will amend the City Charter to prohibit the City of Newport Beach and/or any City-Affiliated Agency from exercising the power of eminent domain to acquire real property, without the owner's consent, for the sole purpose of transferring the property from one person to another in order to further private economic development. The \"Owner\" of the property is defined as the owner of the fee title interest in the property. A \"City-Affiliated Agency\" is defined as any entity possessing the power of eminent domain, the governing board of which is solely composed of, or is solely appointed by, the members of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7725, "fingerprint": "2006|200600346|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600346|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0b8a11133cacf491", "measure_id": "200600346", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) A \"yes\" vote on this initiative measure would be to adopt an ordinance that would require voter approval of a specific plan (a legislative act that must be approved by the City Council) for any proposed \"Major Development\" project, or a \"Minor Development\" project as explained in greater detail below, that requires discretionary approval and increases traffic by more than 100 peak hour trips, density by more than 100 residential dwelling units, or intensity by more than 40,000 square feet of floor area. A discretionary approval is an approval that requires discretion on the part of the City, such as a use permit, variance, subdivision map, modification permit, grading permit, etc.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10820, "no_votes": 18649, "total_votes": 29469, "percent_yes": 36.71654959448912, "percent_no": 63.28345040551088, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.495153", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.456114", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) A \"yes\" vote on this initiative measure would be to adopt an ordinance that would require voter approval of a specific plan (a legislative act that must be approved by the City Council) for any proposed \"Major Development\" project, or a \"Minor Development\" project as explained in greater detail below, that requires discretionary approval and increases traffic by more than 100 peak hour trips, density by more than 100 residential dwelling units, or intensity by more than 40,000 square feet of floor area. A discretionary approval is an approval that requires discretion on the part of the City, such as a use permit, variance, subdivision map, modification permit, grading permit, etc.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7726, "fingerprint": "2006|200600347|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600347|ORANGE", "content_hash": "dfbed3caa979f261", "measure_id": "200600347", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall those portions of City Resolution 06-02-21-03, approving a General Plan Amendment re-designating a 10.5 acre site, owned by San Juan Hills Golf Course on San Juan Creek Road, from Open Space Recreation (\"OSR\") to Planned Community (\"PC\"), with a maximum density of 18 dwelling units per acre, for the purpose of allowing a senior housing project, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3355, "no_votes": 6730, "total_votes": 10085, "percent_yes": 33.26722855726326, "percent_no": 66.73277144273675, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.495481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.456299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall those portions of City Resolution 06-02-21-03, approving a General Plan Amendment re-designating a 10.5 acre site, owned by San Juan Hills Golf Course on San Juan Creek Road, from Open Space Recreation (\"OSR\") to Planned Community (\"PC\"), with a maximum density of 18 dwelling units per acre, for the purpose of allowing a senior housing project, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7731, "fingerprint": "2006|200600352|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600352|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9d823945d0b42887", "measure_id": "200600352", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Under Section 400 of the city charter, new council terms begin at the first regular meeting after the election is certified. Certification can take place as much as 28 days after the election, resulting in the start of the term ranging from mid-November to early December. This measure will set a firm date of the 2nd Tuesday of December for all new terms, providing certainty for new council terms as well as board & commission terms that are tied to council terms. Section 1200 of the charter requires that elections be called by ordinance. The measure will streamline election procedures by allowing elections to be called by resolution, consistent with the rules for most other cities. Section 413 of the city charter restricts the city council's ability to revise ordinances between 1st and 2nd readings, imposes limits on when the city council may authorize emergency orders for the payment of money, and is not clear when the council may take actions other than by ordinance. This amendment will permit modification of an ordinance after 1st reading so long as its purpose and intent is preserved, make it clear that emergency orders for the payment of money may be made at any council meeting, and limit the need for the council to act by ordinance only when required by the charter or state law.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15735, "no_votes": 14588, "total_votes": 30323, "percent_yes": 51.89130363090724, "percent_no": 48.10869636909276, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.497133", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.457215", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Under Section 400 of the city charter, new council terms begin at the first regular meeting after the election is certified. Certification can take place as much as 28 days after the election, resulting in the start of the term ranging from mid-November to early December. This measure will set a firm date of the 2nd Tuesday of December for all new terms, providing certainty for new council terms as well as board & commission terms that are tied to council terms. Section 1200 of the charter requires that elections be called by ordinance. The measure will streamline election procedures by allowing elections to be called by resolution, consistent with the rules for most other cities. Section 413 of the city charter restricts the city council's ability to revise ordinances between 1st and 2nd readings, imposes limits on when the city council may authorize emergency orders for the payment of money, and is not clear when the council may take actions other than by ordinance. This amendment will permit modification of an ordinance after 1st reading so long as its purpose and intent is preserved, make it clear that emergency orders for the payment of money may be made at any council meeting, and limit the need for the council to act by ordinance only when required by the charter or state law.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7735, "fingerprint": "2006|200600038|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600038|PLACER", "content_hash": "e714e6287a2df9d4", "measure_id": "200600038", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Under a current Placer County ordinance enacted by a ballot measure in 1976, Placer County Deputy Sheriffs cannot negotiate salaries.  Under that ordinance, salaries are fixed according to a formula using the average salaries of similar positions in designated counties.  Shall this ordinance be repealed thereby allowing Placer County Deputy Sheriffs to negotiate their own salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37523, "no_votes": 38841, "total_votes": 76364, "percent_yes": 49.13702791891467, "percent_no": 50.86297208108533, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.498337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.457957", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Under a current Placer County ordinance enacted by a ballot measure in 1976, Placer County Deputy Sheriffs cannot negotiate salaries.  Under that ordinance, salaries are fixed according to a formula using the average salaries of similar positions in designated counties.  Shall this ordinance be repealed thereby allowing Placer County Deputy Sheriffs to negotiate their own salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7740, "fingerprint": "2006|200600142|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600142|PLACER", "content_hash": "542d23197c0b13a4", "measure_id": "200600142", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year colleges, plan for growth, improve safety by repairing sewers, leaky roofs, decaying walls, plumbing and electrical systems, constructing, repairing classrooms, labs, sites, nursing/police/fire safety facilities, purchasing equipment, upgrading computer technology and providing training, shall Sierra College School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $78,200,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27560, "no_votes": 35556, "total_votes": 63116, "percent_yes": 43.66563153558527, "percent_no": 56.33436846441473, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.499849", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.458877", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year colleges, plan for growth, improve safety by repairing sewers, leaky roofs, decaying walls, plumbing and electrical systems, constructing, repairing classrooms, labs, sites, nursing/police/fire safety facilities, purchasing equipment, upgrading computer technology and providing training, shall Sierra College School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $78,200,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7736, "fingerprint": "2006|200600071|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600071|PLACER", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200600071", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4763, "no_votes": 4241, "total_votes": 9004, "percent_yes": 52.898711683696135, "percent_no": 47.101288316303865, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.498673", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.458140", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7737, "fingerprint": "2006|200600072|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600072|PLACER", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "200600072", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4472, "no_votes": 4525, "total_votes": 8997, "percent_yes": 49.70545737468045, "percent_no": 50.29454262531955, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.498954", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.458324", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7738, "fingerprint": "2006|200600140|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600140|PLACER", "content_hash": "a4dc25cf378d476f", "measure_id": "200600140", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Alta-Dutch Flat Union School District collect $52 per year per taxable parcel for four years beginning July 1, 2006, in order to continue educational programs by providing support for instructional classroom staff, classroom supplies/materials, and site maintenance, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 390, "no_votes": 226, "total_votes": 616, "percent_yes": 63.31168831168831, "percent_no": 36.68831168831169, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.499222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.458507", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Alta-Dutch Flat Union School District collect $52 per year per taxable parcel for four years beginning July 1, 2006, in order to continue educational programs by providing support for instructional classroom staff, classroom supplies/materials, and site maintenance, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7739, "fingerprint": "2006|200600141|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600141|PLACER", "content_hash": "0900ec077f7acfcc", "measure_id": "200600141", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build and renovate school libraries, install fire safety equipment, remove hazardous materials for student health and safety, upgrade electrical systems to support classroom computers, replace outdated plumbing, repair leaking roofs, build new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and make other specified school facility improvements, shall Grant Joint Union High School District issue $230 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, all funds benefiting local schools and no funds going to administrator salaries or the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32, "no_votes": 78, "total_votes": 110, "percent_yes": 29.09090909090909, "percent_no": 70.9090909090909, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.499543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.458692", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build and renovate school libraries, install fire safety equipment, remove hazardous materials for student health and safety, upgrade electrical systems to support classroom computers, replace outdated plumbing, repair leaking roofs, build new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and make other specified school facility improvements, shall Grant Joint Union High School District issue $230 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, all funds benefiting local schools and no funds going to administrator salaries or the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7743, "fingerprint": "2006|200600501|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600501|PLACER", "content_hash": "d97265f72762998a", "measure_id": "200600501", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7, "no_votes": 28, "total_votes": 35, "percent_yes": 20.0, "percent_no": 80.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.500657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.459432", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7741, "fingerprint": "2006|200600499|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600499|PLACER", "content_hash": "078c099e0028d9c7", "measure_id": "200600499", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Alta-Dutch Flat Union School District collect $52 per year per taxable parcel for four years beginning July 1, 2007, in order to continue educational programs by providing support for instructional classroom staff, classroom supplies/materials, and site maintenance, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 505, "no_votes": 352, "total_votes": 857, "percent_yes": 58.92648774795799, "percent_no": 41.07351225204201, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.500118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.459061", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Alta-Dutch Flat Union School District collect $52 per year per taxable parcel for four years beginning July 1, 2007, in order to continue educational programs by providing support for instructional classroom staff, classroom supplies/materials, and site maintenance, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7742, "fingerprint": "2006|200600500|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600500|PLACER", "content_hash": "e4122994774cb2cb", "measure_id": "200600500", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To Improve education quality through the district, shall the Loomis Union School district modernize student facilities, upgrade safety systems, enhance technology, construct gymnasiums/multi-purpose rooms, provide improved access for disabled persons, relocate/centralize student support services facilities, enhance physical education facilities, and provide additional classrooms by issuing $19,500,000 of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit, with a citizens' oversight committee, independent audits, and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4511, "no_votes": 3994, "total_votes": 8505, "percent_yes": 53.03938859494415, "percent_no": 46.96061140505585, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.500385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.459244", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To Improve education quality through the district, shall the Loomis Union School district modernize student facilities, upgrade safety systems, enhance technology, construct gymnasiums/multi-purpose rooms, provide improved access for disabled persons, relocate/centralize student support services facilities, enhance physical education facilities, and provide additional classrooms by issuing $19,500,000 of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit, with a citizens' oversight committee, independent audits, and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7744, "fingerprint": "2006|200600143|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600143|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a3d67a6f61f47e45", "measure_id": "200600143", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall that area of the Beaumont Unified School District (described below) be transferred to the Banning Unified School District (that territory being the Sun Lakes area of the City of Banning, generally located South of the Interstate 10 Freeway, East of Highland Springs Avenue, West of South Highland Home Road, and North of the Southern Banning City Limits)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6499, "no_votes": 4076, "total_votes": 10575, "percent_yes": 61.45626477541372, "percent_no": 38.54373522458628, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.500984", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.459715", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall that area of the Beaumont Unified School District (described below) be transferred to the Banning Unified School District (that territory being the Sun Lakes area of the City of Banning, generally located South of the Interstate 10 Freeway, East of Highland Springs Avenue, West of South Highland Home Road, and North of the Southern Banning City Limits)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7746, "fingerprint": "2006|200600145|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600145|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c98063c2bba415e8", "measure_id": "200600145", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve student overcrowding by building new schools, making repairs and improvements to existing schools throughout the District, and making the District eligible for State matching funds, shall Hemet Unified School District issue $149 million of bonds at the lowest available interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries, and all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10463, "no_votes": 9234, "total_votes": 19697, "percent_yes": 53.11976443113164, "percent_no": 46.88023556886836, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.501571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.460138", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve student overcrowding by building new schools, making repairs and improvements to existing schools throughout the District, and making the District eligible for State matching funds, shall Hemet Unified School District issue $149 million of bonds at the lowest available interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries, and all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7748, "fingerprint": "2006|200600147|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600147|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c982905040f2dfa5", "measure_id": "200600147", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, renovate, and equip classrooms, schools and educational facilities throughout the District, build new classrooms and schools, and make the District eligible for matching State funds, shall Nuview Union School District issue $39.6 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an Independent Citizens. Oversight Committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 622, "no_votes": 481, "total_votes": 1103, "percent_yes": 56.391659111514045, "percent_no": 43.608340888485955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.502125", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.460498", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, renovate, and equip classrooms, schools and educational facilities throughout the District, build new classrooms and schools, and make the District eligible for matching State funds, shall Nuview Union School District issue $39.6 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an Independent Citizens. Oversight Committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7747, "fingerprint": "2006|200600146|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600146|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "9322ab7744db1623", "measure_id": "200600146", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, improve student learning and safety, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Murrieta Valley Unified Bonds School District complete construction of a third high school; build two new elementary schools and a new middle school; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; and upgrade classrooms, school technology, facilities and grounds; by issuing $120,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrative salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Murrieta schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6327, "no_votes": 4699, "total_votes": 11026, "percent_yes": 57.38255033557047, "percent_no": 42.61744966442953, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.501856", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.460318", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, improve student learning and safety, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Murrieta Valley Unified Bonds School District complete construction of a third high school; build two new elementary schools and a new middle school; replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; and upgrade classrooms, school technology, facilities and grounds; by issuing $120,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrative salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Murrieta schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7755, "fingerprint": "2006|200600360|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600360|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "200600360", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2026, "no_votes": 3486, "total_votes": 5512, "percent_yes": 36.75616835994194, "percent_no": 63.24383164005806, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.504275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.461786", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7749, "fingerprint": "2006|200600148|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600148|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e2359bb9a67a36e2", "measure_id": "200600148", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare local college students for four-year colleges; jobs in nursing/public safety/business, and accommodate growing enrollment; repair classrooms/buildings, science labs; upgrade fire safety, leaky roofs, plumbing, electrical wiring, computer technology: earthquake retrofit; construct/equip energy efficient classrooms/buildings; remove asbestos; acquire land; ensure handicapped accessibility; shall Mt. San Jacinto Community College District issue $720 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, Citizens Oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42697, "no_votes": 35501, "total_votes": 78198, "percent_yes": 54.6011406941354, "percent_no": 45.3988593058646, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.502443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.460686", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare local college students for four-year colleges; jobs in nursing/public safety/business, and accommodate growing enrollment; repair classrooms/buildings, science labs; upgrade fire safety, leaky roofs, plumbing, electrical wiring, computer technology: earthquake retrofit; construct/equip energy efficient classrooms/buildings; remove asbestos; acquire land; ensure handicapped accessibility; shall Mt. San Jacinto Community College District issue $720 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, Citizens Oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7745, "fingerprint": "2006|200600144|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600144|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "176716288a6bcd6f", "measure_id": "200600144", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Banning Unified School District repair, upgrade, construct and equip local schools including: upgrade electrical wiring, expand/add science labs and libraries to meet current standards, address building safety is- sues, repair deteriorating restrooms/plumbing and HVAC; construct additional classrooms and schools to accommodate enrollment and make necessary improvements to school facilities, by issuing $63,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, requiring annual audits and continuing the citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1484, "no_votes": 1317, "total_votes": 2801, "percent_yes": 52.98107818636202, "percent_no": 47.01892181363798, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.501296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.459951", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Banning Unified School District repair, upgrade, construct and equip local schools including: upgrade electrical wiring, expand/add science labs and libraries to meet current standards, address building safety is- sues, repair deteriorating restrooms/plumbing and HVAC; construct additional classrooms and schools to accommodate enrollment and make necessary improvements to school facilities, by issuing $63,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, requiring annual audits and continuing the citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7754, "fingerprint": "2006|200600359|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600359|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "bb77390dd54828d9", "measure_id": "200600359", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 428 be adopted to validate, re-enact, and approve the existing transient occupancy tax rate of 11% for group hotels and 10% for all other hotels, as such rates are established by the first sentence of Municipal Code Section 3.24.030 and as group hotels are defined in Municipal Code Section 3.24.020.1, which provisions were passed in September of 1992 in Ordinance No. 211?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6601, "no_votes": 1774, "total_votes": 8375, "percent_yes": 78.8179104477612, "percent_no": 21.182089552238807, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.503860", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.461599", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 428 be adopted to validate, re-enact, and approve the existing transient occupancy tax rate of 11% for group hotels and 10% for all other hotels, as such rates are established by the first sentence of Municipal Code Section 3.24.030 and as group hotels are defined in Municipal Code Section 3.24.020.1, which provisions were passed in September of 1992 in Ordinance No. 211?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7751, "fingerprint": "2006|200600356|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600356|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "fe0e9d392650d88d", "measure_id": "200600356", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the position of City Clerk be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8524, "no_votes": 7163, "total_votes": 15687, "percent_yes": 54.33798686810734, "percent_no": 45.66201313189266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.503023", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.461052", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the position of City Clerk be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7758, "fingerprint": "2006|200600363|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600363|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4cfee6cbab1e9a72", "measure_id": "200600363", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 400 and 500 of the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to conduct (a) City Council elections in June of odd-numbered years beginning in June of 2007; and (b) Mayoral elections in June of United States Presidential election years with run-off elections, if required, in November of United States Presidential election years beginning in June 2012?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27982, "no_votes": 17573, "total_votes": 45555, "percent_yes": 61.42465152014049, "percent_no": 38.57534847985951, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.505488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.462321", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 400 and 500 of the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to conduct (a) City Council elections in June of odd-numbered years beginning in June of 2007; and (b) Mayoral elections in June of United States Presidential election years with run-off elections, if required, in November of United States Presidential election years beginning in June 2012?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7753, "fingerprint": "2006|200600358|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600358|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "6f7a0b6200ccde9e", "measure_id": "200600358", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure entitled: \"Rezone of certain parcels located between Avenue 49, 50, Monroe Street and Jefferson Street\" be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3711, "no_votes": 5210, "total_votes": 8921, "percent_yes": 41.59847550723013, "percent_no": 58.40152449276987, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.503575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.461412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure entitled: \"Rezone of certain parcels located between Avenue 49, 50, Monroe Street and Jefferson Street\" be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7756, "fingerprint": "2006|200600361|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600361|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e0464aa94407aad6", "measure_id": "200600361", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Unless otherwise exempted or additional setbacks are imposed, shall the height of all structures in the City be limited to twenty feet or less?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5056, "no_votes": 1204, "total_votes": 6260, "percent_yes": 80.7667731629393, "percent_no": 19.2332268370607, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.504659", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.461964", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Unless otherwise exempted or additional setbacks are imposed, shall the height of all structures in the City be limited to twenty feet or less?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7757, "fingerprint": "2006|200600362|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600362|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2beeea706df487f0", "measure_id": "200600362", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall all regular and adjourned regular meetings of the City Council, Planning Commission and Architectural Review Board be recorded in an audio and/or video format and shall all such recordings be retained by the City for a period of no less than 25 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5008, "no_votes": 1216, "total_votes": 6224, "percent_yes": 80.46272493573264, "percent_no": 19.537275064267362, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.505153", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.462143", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall all regular and adjourned regular meetings of the City Council, Planning Commission and Architectural Review Board be recorded in an audio and/or video format and shall all such recordings be retained by the City for a period of no less than 25 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7752, "fingerprint": "2006|200600357|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600357|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2929854ef3ed8b94", "measure_id": "200600357", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance Bill No. 2006-12 be adopted to impose a transient occupancy tax on condo hotel renters, a fee in lieu of transient occupancy taxes for personal use of condo hotel units by unit owners over sixty (60) days in calendar year, and an amenity fee tax on condo hotel units owners to mitigate City's potential loss of transient occupancy taxes, to support the City's General Fund to pay for municipal services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1717, "no_votes": 374, "total_votes": 2091, "percent_yes": 82.11382113821138, "percent_no": 17.886178861788622, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.503292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.461231", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance Bill No. 2006-12 be adopted to impose a transient occupancy tax on condo hotel renters, a fee in lieu of transient occupancy taxes for personal use of condo hotel units by unit owners over sixty (60) days in calendar year, and an amenity fee tax on condo hotel units owners to mitigate City's potential loss of transient occupancy taxes, to support the City's General Fund to pay for municipal services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7750, "fingerprint": "2006|200600355|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600355|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cd7929da7ef2c5d7", "measure_id": "200600355", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a 0.75% tax be imposed on transactions and uses in the city, with the revenue to be used for general municipal purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2836, "no_votes": 5632, "total_votes": 8468, "percent_yes": 33.49078885214926, "percent_no": 66.50921114785075, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.502754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.460871", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a 0.75% tax be imposed on transactions and uses in the city, with the revenue to be used for general municipal purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7759, "fingerprint": "2006|200600502|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600502|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "03c7a4ba660da8a3", "measure_id": "200600502", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Banning Unified School District construct, repair, upgrade and equip local schools including: upgrade electrical wiring, expand/add science labs and libraries to meet current standards, address building safety issues, repair deteriorating restrooms/plumbing and HVAC; construct additional classrooms and schools to accommodate enrollment and make necessary improvements to school facilities, by issuing $63,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, requiring annual audits and continuing the citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2635, "no_votes": 1911, "total_votes": 4546, "percent_yes": 57.96304443466784, "percent_no": 42.03695556533216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.505764", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.462501", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Banning Unified School District construct, repair, upgrade and equip local schools including: upgrade electrical wiring, expand/add science labs and libraries to meet current standards, address building safety issues, repair deteriorating restrooms/plumbing and HVAC; construct additional classrooms and schools to accommodate enrollment and make necessary improvements to school facilities, by issuing $63,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, requiring annual audits and continuing the citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7762, "fingerprint": "2006|200600505|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600505|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "02e471b56e7a8ccf", "measure_id": "200600505", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Perris elementary school by making health and safety repairs to classrooms and restrooms, adding classrooms and school facilities to relieve overcrowding, removing hazardous materials like asbestos, upgrading school libraries, repairing leaking roofs and pluming, upgrading electrical systems computers and educational technology, qualifying for State Funds, and making other school improvements, shall Perris Elementary School District issue $25 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and no funds going to administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2823, "no_votes": 1288, "total_votes": 4111, "percent_yes": 68.66942349793239, "percent_no": 31.330576502067615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.507052", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.463046", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Perris elementary school by making health and safety repairs to classrooms and restrooms, adding classrooms and school facilities to relieve overcrowding, removing hazardous materials like asbestos, upgrading school libraries, repairing leaking roofs and pluming, upgrading electrical systems computers and educational technology, qualifying for State Funds, and making other school improvements, shall Perris Elementary School District issue $25 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and no funds going to administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7761, "fingerprint": "2006|200600504|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600504|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7c94424035fdcac6", "measure_id": "200600504", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade and renovate existing schools throughout the District, make health and safety improvements, update technology, build new schools to relieve students overcrowding and maintain small class sizes, and make the District eligible for $80,000,000 in State matching grants, shall Hemet Unified School district issue $149,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17757, "no_votes": 12736, "total_votes": 30493, "percent_yes": 58.233037090479776, "percent_no": 41.766962909520224, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.506481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.462863", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, upgrade and renovate existing schools throughout the District, make health and safety improvements, update technology, build new schools to relieve students overcrowding and maintain small class sizes, and make the District eligible for $80,000,000 in State matching grants, shall Hemet Unified School district issue $149,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with spending annually reviewed by an independent citizens oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7760, "fingerprint": "2006|200600503|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600503|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "227f3c3f0413158e", "measure_id": "200600503", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve learning and prepare for enrollment growth at Corona, Norco, Eastvale and Temescal Valley schools, shall Corona-Norco Unified School District: Build new classrooms, elementary, intermediate and high schools; Increase kindergarten classrooms; Add school libraries; Create reading, science and computer labs; Upgrade security, sprinklers, smoke detectors and fire doors; by issuing $250 million in bonds at interest rates, with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrations' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24101, "no_votes": 14967, "total_votes": 39068, "percent_yes": 61.68987406573154, "percent_no": 38.31012593426846, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.506119", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.462681", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve learning and prepare for enrollment growth at Corona, Norco, Eastvale and Temescal Valley schools, shall Corona-Norco Unified School District: Build new classrooms, elementary, intermediate and high schools; Increase kindergarten classrooms; Add school libraries; Create reading, science and computer labs; Upgrade security, sprinklers, smoke detectors and fire doors; by issuing $250 million in bonds at interest rates, with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrations' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7763, "fingerprint": "2006|200600506|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600506|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4aaa10928d477db9", "measure_id": "200600506", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve San Jacinto Unified schools by adding classrooms and school facilities to relieve overcrowding, making health and safety repairs to classrooms/restrooms, removing hazardous materials like asbestos, repairing leaking roofs and plumbing, upgrading electrical systems, computers, educational technology and school libraries, improving disabled access, qualifying for State funds and making other school improvements, shall San Jacinto Unified School District issue $150,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and no funds going to administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4153, "no_votes": 2045, "total_votes": 6198, "percent_yes": 67.0054856405292, "percent_no": 32.9945143594708, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.507379", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.463230", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve San Jacinto Unified schools by adding classrooms and school facilities to relieve overcrowding, making health and safety repairs to classrooms/restrooms, removing hazardous materials like asbestos, repairing leaking roofs and plumbing, upgrading electrical systems, computers, educational technology and school libraries, improving disabled access, qualifying for State funds and making other school improvements, shall San Jacinto Unified School District issue $150,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and no funds going to administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7768, "fingerprint": "2006|200600153|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600153|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "25c2140f431f111c", "measure_id": "200600153", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year colleges, plan for growth, improve safety by repairing sewers, leaky roofs, decaying walls, plumbing and electrical systems, constructing, repairing classrooms, labs, sites, nursing/police/fire safety facilities, purchasing equipment, upgrading computer technology and providing training, shall Sierra College School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $78,200,000 in bonds, at legal rates with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2407, "no_votes": 2032, "total_votes": 4439, "percent_yes": 54.22392430727642, "percent_no": 45.77607569272358, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.508882", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.464143", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year colleges, plan for growth, improve safety by repairing sewers, leaky roofs, decaying walls, plumbing and electrical systems, constructing, repairing classrooms, labs, sites, nursing/police/fire safety facilities, purchasing equipment, upgrading computer technology and providing training, shall Sierra College School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $78,200,000 in bonds, at legal rates with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7767, "fingerprint": "2006|200600152|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600152|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "838545c342a469ad", "measure_id": "200600152", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide North Sacramento safe, healthy schools by repairing aging facilities, ensuring all classrooms have heating and air conditioning, rewiring classrooms for access to modern technology and making schools accessible for disabled children, ensuring that every school is a safe and modern place to learn, shall the North Sacramento School District issue $17,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates?  The Board will appoint a citizen's oversight committee, conduct annual independent audits, and spend funds only on school and classroom improvements.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2523, "no_votes": 1118, "total_votes": 3641, "percent_yes": 69.29414995880254, "percent_no": 30.705850041197465, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.508611", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.463959", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide North Sacramento safe, healthy schools by repairing aging facilities, ensuring all classrooms have heating and air conditioning, rewiring classrooms for access to modern technology and making schools accessible for disabled children, ensuring that every school is a safe and modern place to learn, shall the North Sacramento School District issue $17,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates?  The Board will appoint a citizen's oversight committee, conduct annual independent audits, and spend funds only on school and classroom improvements.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7765, "fingerprint": "2006|200600150|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600150|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "e46f6fd80bc99c64", "measure_id": "200600150", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education throughout Natomas, shall the Natomas Unified School District provide additional classrooms, construct facilities, modernize classrooms, renovate playfields, improve access to schools for students, staff and the community, and become eligible for all additional State matching funds by issuing $145,500,000 in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit, reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, independent audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4358, "no_votes": 2671, "total_votes": 7029, "percent_yes": 62.000284535495794, "percent_no": 37.999715464504206, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.508057", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.463592", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education throughout Natomas, shall the Natomas Unified School District provide additional classrooms, construct facilities, modernize classrooms, renovate playfields, improve access to schools for students, staff and the community, and become eligible for all additional State matching funds by issuing $145,500,000 in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit, reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, independent audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7766, "fingerprint": "2006|200600151|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600151|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "f93c151ed870a269", "measure_id": "200600151", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to expand educational programs, prevent cuts, reduce class sizes, improve school safety for all children in the District, purchase new textbooks, restore vocational programs, bring back school counselors, librarians and nurses, fund before and after school programs, and provide additional subject area instruction, shall the Natomas Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual special tax of $96 per parcel, adjusted annually at less than 3.86%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3974, "no_votes": 2999, "total_votes": 6973, "percent_yes": 56.99125197189158, "percent_no": 43.00874802810842, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.508331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.463776", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to expand educational programs, prevent cuts, reduce class sizes, improve school safety for all children in the District, purchase new textbooks, restore vocational programs, bring back school counselors, librarians and nurses, fund before and after school programs, and provide additional subject area instruction, shall the Natomas Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual special tax of $96 per parcel, adjusted annually at less than 3.86%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7764, "fingerprint": "2006|200600149|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600149|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "0900ec077f7acfcc", "measure_id": "200600149", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build and renovate school libraries, install fire safety equipment, remove hazardous materials for student health and safety, upgrade electrical systems to support classroom computers, replace outdated plumbing, repair leaking roofs, build new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and make other specified school facility improvements, shall Grant Joint Union High School District issue $230 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, all funds benefiting local schools and no funds going to administrator salaries or the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10445, "no_votes": 6227, "total_votes": 16672, "percent_yes": 62.64995201535508, "percent_no": 37.35004798464492, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.507666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.463410", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build and renovate school libraries, install fire safety equipment, remove hazardous materials for student health and safety, upgrade electrical systems to support classroom computers, replace outdated plumbing, repair leaking roofs, build new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and make other specified school facility improvements, shall Grant Joint Union High School District issue $230 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, all funds benefiting local schools and no funds going to administrator salaries or the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7774, "fingerprint": "2006|200600510|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600510|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "feaee257e2b3c435", "measure_id": "200600510", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall trustee areas be established in the Sacramento City Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39542, "no_votes": 28696, "total_votes": 68238, "percent_yes": 57.94718485301444, "percent_no": 42.05281514698556, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.510671", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.465248", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall trustee areas be established in the Sacramento City Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7775, "fingerprint": "2006|200600511|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600511|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "24d8b23955d03a42", "measure_id": "200600511", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "If trustee areas are established, shall the area trustee be elected by the voters who reside in the trustee area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45590, "no_votes": 28961, "total_votes": 74551, "percent_yes": 61.15276790385106, "percent_no": 38.84723209614894, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.511097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.465428", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If trustee areas are established, shall the area trustee be elected by the voters who reside in the trustee area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7771, "fingerprint": "2006|200600507|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600507|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "055dfaf7e4580c08", "measure_id": "200600507", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To utilize state funding and developer fees, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District construct elementary, middle, and high schools, libraries, computer labs, support facilities, acquire land, and acquire equipment and computer technology, by issuing $750 million in bonds at legal interest rates and appoint a citizens oversight committee to monitor expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63, "no_votes": 38, "total_votes": 101, "percent_yes": 62.37623762376238, "percent_no": 37.62376237623762, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.509809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.464700", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To utilize state funding and developer fees, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 3 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District construct elementary, middle, and high schools, libraries, computer labs, support facilities, acquire land, and acquire equipment and computer technology, by issuing $750 million in bonds at legal interest rates and appoint a citizens oversight committee to monitor expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7772, "fingerprint": "2006|200600508|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600508|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "f9fd711d21b05549", "measure_id": "200600508", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Rancho Cordova School Repair Measure: For Rancho Cordova only, to improve the quality of education and insure students gain the skills needed to succeed, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 4 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District upgrade, construct, repair and equip classrooms, computer labs, science, vocational and support areas by issuing $125,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, conduct annual audits, and form a citizens oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8199, "no_votes": 3646, "total_votes": 11845, "percent_yes": 69.2190797804981, "percent_no": 30.780920219501894, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.510081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.464880", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Rancho Cordova School Repair Measure: For Rancho Cordova only, to improve the quality of education and insure students gain the skills needed to succeed, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 4 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District upgrade, construct, repair and equip classrooms, computer labs, science, vocational and support areas by issuing $125,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, conduct annual audits, and form a citizens oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7773, "fingerprint": "2006|200600509|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600509|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "057e7d5b3b561adc", "measure_id": "200600509", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Local Elementary School Improvement Measure: To maintain excellent local elementary schools, repair and upgrade classrooms and restrooms, install energy efficient heating, ventilation, cooling systems, improve handicap access and student drop-off areas, security and emergency systems, shall Rio Linda Union School District issue $38 million of bonds at legal rates, renovate, acquire, construct schools, repair and equip our local neighborhood elementary schools, sites and facilities, and require independent financial audits, citizen oversight with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11752, "no_votes": 7163, "total_votes": 18915, "percent_yes": 62.13058419243986, "percent_no": 37.86941580756014, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.510350", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.465063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Local Elementary School Improvement Measure: To maintain excellent local elementary schools, repair and upgrade classrooms and restrooms, install energy efficient heating, ventilation, cooling systems, improve handicap access and student drop-off areas, security and emergency systems, shall Rio Linda Union School District issue $38 million of bonds at legal rates, renovate, acquire, construct schools, repair and equip our local neighborhood elementary schools, sites and facilities, and require independent financial audits, citizen oversight with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7769, "fingerprint": "2006|200600220|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600220|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "7cd599452f85b221", "measure_id": "200600220", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) To enhance cultural and entertainment opportunities and improve the quality of life, shall no more than 50% of a new voter-approved sales tax be used for a publicly-owned sports and entertainment facility with the remaining balance used for local priorities such as: street, transit, and park improvements; police, sheriff, and fire safety enhancements; libraries; after school and senior programs; and arts and cultural facilities/programs? THIS MEASURE DOES NOT INCREASE TAXES.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 100031, "no_votes": 250039, "total_votes": 350070, "percent_yes": 28.57457080012568, "percent_no": 71.42542919987432, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.509251", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.464331", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) To enhance cultural and entertainment opportunities and improve the quality of life, shall no more than 50% of a new voter-approved sales tax be used for a publicly-owned sports and entertainment facility with the remaining balance used for local priorities such as: street, transit, and park improvements; police, sheriff, and fire safety enhancements; libraries; after school and senior programs; and arts and cultural facilities/programs? THIS MEASURE DOES NOT INCREASE TAXES.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7770, "fingerprint": "2006|200600221|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600221|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "ed95dc88bcce336f", "measure_id": "200600221", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors levy a 1/4 percent transaction and use tax (sales tax) for a maximum of 15 years for general governmental purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68339, "no_votes": 279907, "total_votes": 348246, "percent_yes": 19.623771701613222, "percent_no": 80.37622829838678, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.509538", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.464515", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors levy a 1/4 percent transaction and use tax (sales tax) for a maximum of 15 years for general governmental purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7778, "fingerprint": "2006|200600156|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600156|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "55fd7658a13c2a94", "measure_id": "200600156", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading electrical systems and technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 1, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.511928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.465982", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and educational facilities at all campuses including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading electrical systems and technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and qualifying the District for over $79,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for employees' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7777, "fingerprint": "2006|200600155|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600155|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "cbea02aaac021d02", "measure_id": "200600155", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local elementary education, shall North County Joint Union School District provide additional classrooms, construct a cafeteria, upgrade, furnish and equip classrooms and school facilities, renovate and repair playfields, and construct parking lots to accommodate staff, students, and other visitors, by issuing $3,350,000 in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit with a citizens' oversight committee, audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 442, "no_votes": 363, "total_votes": 805, "percent_yes": 54.90683229813664, "percent_no": 45.09316770186336, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.511657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.465797", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local elementary education, shall North County Joint Union School District provide additional classrooms, construct a cafeteria, upgrade, furnish and equip classrooms and school facilities, renovate and repair playfields, and construct parking lots to accommodate staff, students, and other visitors, by issuing $3,350,000 in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit with a citizens' oversight committee, audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7776, "fingerprint": "2006|200600154|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600154|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "501317cd11a70774", "measure_id": "200600154", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety conditions of neighborhood schools, replace relocatable classrooms and construct, acquire, upgrade and equip classrooms, facilities and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $23,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, maintain its Citizens' Oversight Committee and enforce strict financial accountability guidelines to guarantee that no bond money is used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 632, "no_votes": 682, "total_votes": 1314, "percent_yes": 48.09741248097412, "percent_no": 51.90258751902588, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.511374", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.465613", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety conditions of neighborhood schools, replace relocatable classrooms and construct, acquire, upgrade and equip classrooms, facilities and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $23,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, maintain its Citizens' Oversight Committee and enforce strict financial accountability guidelines to guarantee that no bond money is used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7779, "fingerprint": "2006|200600364|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600364|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "200600364", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3297, "no_votes": 3908, "total_votes": 7205, "percent_yes": 45.75988896599584, "percent_no": 54.24011103400416, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.512200", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.466168", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7782, "fingerprint": "2006|200600367|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600367|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "995985db8035da38", "measure_id": "200600367", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the previously elective office of City Clerk henceforth be appointed by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 167, "no_votes": 348, "total_votes": 515, "percent_yes": 32.42718446601941, "percent_no": 67.57281553398059, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.513125", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.466718", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the previously elective office of City Clerk henceforth be appointed by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7783, "fingerprint": "2006|200600368|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600368|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "457a80634ac86f16", "measure_id": "200600368", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the previously elective office of City Treasurer henceforth be appointed by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 142, "no_votes": 375, "total_votes": 517, "percent_yes": 27.466150870406192, "percent_no": 72.5338491295938, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.513389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.466901", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the previously elective office of City Treasurer henceforth be appointed by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7780, "fingerprint": "2006|200600365|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600365|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "9f7705879acafdea", "measure_id": "200600365", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved enacting a temporary one percent (1%) sales tax for the purpose of funding general City services such as public safety, parks, recreation programs and street improvements with the following mandatory restrictions?  The sales tax will automatically expire five years after its operative date; a citizens' oversight committee shall annually review and report on revenues and disbursements following a public hearing.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3536, "no_votes": 3908, "total_votes": 7444, "percent_yes": 47.50134336378291, "percent_no": 52.49865663621709, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.512466", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.466350", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved enacting a temporary one percent (1%) sales tax for the purpose of funding general City services such as public safety, parks, recreation programs and street improvements with the following mandatory restrictions?  The sales tax will automatically expire five years after its operative date; a citizens' oversight committee shall annually review and report on revenues and disbursements following a public hearing.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7781, "fingerprint": "2006|200600366|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600366|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "0507eb70ef552f88", "measure_id": "200600366", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Do you approve an initiative that: Amends Hollister's General Plan and Municipal Code establishing a Mixed Use Residential Communities (\"MURCs\") category; designates approximately 1,365 acres east of Highway 25 and north of Highway 156 for a MURC of up to 4,400 dwelling units and other uses subject to City review; and exempts from voter approved growth limits up to 650 dwellings per year in a MURC that includes some housing for persons ages 55 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3162, "no_votes": 4391, "total_votes": 7553, "percent_yes": 41.86415993644909, "percent_no": 58.13584006355091, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.512853", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.466532", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Do you approve an initiative that: Amends Hollister's General Plan and Municipal Code establishing a Mixed Use Residential Communities (\"MURCs\") category; designates approximately 1,365 acres east of Highway 25 and north of Highway 156 for a MURC of up to 4,400 dwelling units and other uses subject to City review; and exempts from voter approved growth limits up to 650 dwellings per year in a MURC that includes some housing for persons ages 55 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7784, "fingerprint": "2006|200600512|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600512|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "4123c26c37d02655", "measure_id": "200600512", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and education facilities at all campuses, including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and a new Ag Expo/rodeo arena, by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates and qualifying for over $79,000,000 in state matching funds not otherwise available, with annual audits, and a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 1, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.513666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.467085", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for students and the community, shall the West Hills Community College District improve classrooms and education facilities at all campuses, including constructing instructional buildings for computer, math, and social science classes, upgrading technology, building a multipurpose wellness center, and a new Ag Expo/rodeo arena, by issuing $49,400,000 in bonds at legal rates and qualifying for over $79,000,000 in state matching funds not otherwise available, with annual audits, and a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7786, "fingerprint": "2006|200600074|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600074|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "afedf23eec57ed02", "measure_id": "200600074", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Paul Luellig be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1668, "no_votes": 1522, "total_votes": 3190, "percent_yes": 52.288401253918494, "percent_no": 47.711598746081506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.514222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.467458", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Paul Luellig be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7792, "fingerprint": "2006|200600159|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600159|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f9a5b937502afc6c", "measure_id": "200600159", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Sierra Sands Unified School District be authorized to construct new classrooms, upgrade, renovate, and modernize classrooms and facilities including upgrading plumbing systems, renovating restrooms, making health and safety improvements, repairing and replacing roofs, improving student access to computers and technology, and qualifying the District for over $13,000,000 in State grants by issuing $50,500,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with a citizens? oversight committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23, "no_votes": 24, "total_votes": 47, "percent_yes": 48.93617021276595, "percent_no": 51.06382978723405, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.516015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.468594", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Sierra Sands Unified School District be authorized to construct new classrooms, upgrade, renovate, and modernize classrooms and facilities including upgrading plumbing systems, renovating restrooms, making health and safety improvements, repairing and replacing roofs, improving student access to computers and technology, and qualifying the District for over $13,000,000 in State grants by issuing $50,500,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with a citizens? oversight committee, annual audits and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7790, "fingerprint": "2006|200600157|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600157|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "00faa6bdc7387dc7", "measure_id": "200600157", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health, safety, class instruction by: Reducing overcrowding; Improving traffic flow, drop-off areas, handicapped student accessibility; Purchasing computers, land for new schools; Building/equipping energy efficient libraries, labs, facilities, elementary, middle, high schools; Repairing outdated plumbing, bathrooms; shall Fontana Unified School District issue $275 million of bonds at legal rates with guaranteed financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5598, "no_votes": 2949, "total_votes": 8547, "percent_yes": 65.4966654966655, "percent_no": 34.5033345033345, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.515447", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.468206", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health, safety, class instruction by: Reducing overcrowding; Improving traffic flow, drop-off areas, handicapped student accessibility; Purchasing computers, land for new schools; Building/equipping energy efficient libraries, labs, facilities, elementary, middle, high schools; Repairing outdated plumbing, bathrooms; shall Fontana Unified School District issue $275 million of bonds at legal rates with guaranteed financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7789, "fingerprint": "2006|200600077|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600077|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f0b1bf1c28019849", "measure_id": "200600077", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Approve a Charter Amendment to set the annual salary of Council members on January 1 2007 at 12 \u00bd% of the salary for a Superior Court Judge, County of San Bernardino, State of California, which was in effect on February 1, 2006, thereafter adjusted and implemented January 1 of each subsequent year to 12 \u00bd% of the salary for said Superior Court Judge then in effect on that January 1 date. The annual salary would be received in twelve (12) equal monthly payments.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6479, "no_votes": 7739, "total_votes": 14218, "percent_yes": 45.56899704599802, "percent_no": 54.43100295400198, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.515148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.468017", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approve a Charter Amendment to set the annual salary of Council members on January 1 2007 at 12 \u00bd% of the salary for a Superior Court Judge, County of San Bernardino, State of California, which was in effect on February 1, 2006, thereafter adjusted and implemented January 1 of each subsequent year to 12 \u00bd% of the salary for said Superior Court Judge then in effect on that January 1 date. The annual salary would be received in twelve (12) equal monthly payments.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7788, "fingerprint": "2006|200600076|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600076|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "eb0853058dd6f29c", "measure_id": "200600076", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Solely to repair/maintain residential roads; fix potholes to improve neighborhood traffic conditions and road safety; and to improve the drainage system to prevent flooding and damage, shall the sales tax be increased by one-half cent automatically expiring in 10 years; with funds deposited into a restricted account guaranteeing future administrations cannot use the money for other purposes; requiring annual financial audits; overseen by an independent citizen?s oversight committee; and no money for administrative overhead?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 855, "no_votes": 568, "total_votes": 1423, "percent_yes": 60.0843288826423, "percent_no": 39.9156711173577, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.514769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.467833", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Solely to repair/maintain residential roads; fix potholes to improve neighborhood traffic conditions and road safety; and to improve the drainage system to prevent flooding and damage, shall the sales tax be increased by one-half cent automatically expiring in 10 years; with funds deposited into a restricted account guaranteeing future administrations cannot use the money for other purposes; requiring annual financial audits; overseen by an independent citizen?s oversight committee; and no money for administrative overhead?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7787, "fingerprint": "2006|200600075|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600075|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "15b8a737247b365b", "measure_id": "200600075", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance entitled \u201cIndian Gaming: Preference for Tribes in San Bernardino County\u201d be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 638, "no_votes": 2637, "total_votes": 3275, "percent_yes": 19.480916030534356, "percent_no": 80.51908396946564, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.514489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.467646", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance entitled \u201cIndian Gaming: Preference for Tribes in San Bernardino County\u201d be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7793, "fingerprint": "2006|200600160|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600160|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "9df0271a0c1f3cdb", "measure_id": "200600160", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, improve student learning and safety, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Snowline Joint Unified School District construct 2 new elementary schools, a new middle school, and the first phase of a new high school; upgrade security and technology; and repair/upgrade inadequate classrooms and school facilities, equipment and grounds; by issuing $108,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrative salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Snowline schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2823, "no_votes": 2433, "total_votes": 5256, "percent_yes": 53.710045662100455, "percent_no": 46.289954337899545, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.516375", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.468779", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, improve student learning and safety, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Snowline Joint Unified School District construct 2 new elementary schools, a new middle school, and the first phase of a new high school; upgrade security and technology; and repair/upgrade inadequate classrooms and school facilities, equipment and grounds; by issuing $108,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrative salaries, and all funds staying local to benefit Snowline schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7791, "fingerprint": "2006|200600158|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600158|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "5b179aaaad8d25c6", "measure_id": "200600158", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Needles Unified School District be authorized to upgrade, improve, construct, and modernize classrooms and school facilities including modernizing Vista Colorado Elementary School and Needles Middle School, providing students and community with a gymnasium at Needles Middle School, constructing a new elementary school, making health and safety improvements, and qualifying the District for $7,400,000 in State grants by issuing $7,500,000 in bonds within legal rates, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 536, "no_votes": 466, "total_votes": 1002, "percent_yes": 53.49301397205589, "percent_no": 46.50698602794411, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.515739", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.468397", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Needles Unified School District be authorized to upgrade, improve, construct, and modernize classrooms and school facilities including modernizing Vista Colorado Elementary School and Needles Middle School, providing students and community with a gymnasium at Needles Middle School, constructing a new elementary school, making health and safety improvements, and qualifying the District for $7,400,000 in State grants by issuing $7,500,000 in bonds within legal rates, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7794, "fingerprint": "2006|200600222|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600222|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "25425d04026954fc", "measure_id": "200600222", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on June 21, 2006, by the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County ordering the reorganization to include formation of the Helendale Community Services District and the Dissolution of County Service Area 70 Improvement Zone B and County Service Area 70 Improvement Zone C, known as LAFCO 2996, be approved subject to the terms and conditions as more particularly describe in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 855, "no_votes": 843, "total_votes": 1698, "percent_yes": 50.35335689045937, "percent_no": 49.64664310954063, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.516656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.468963", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on June 21, 2006, by the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County ordering the reorganization to include formation of the Helendale Community Services District and the Dissolution of County Service Area 70 Improvement Zone B and County Service Area 70 Improvement Zone C, known as LAFCO 2996, be approved subject to the terms and conditions as more particularly describe in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7807, "fingerprint": "2006|200600513|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600513|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "22e352acec95ccd1", "measure_id": "200600513", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Elementary School Safety/Repair Measure: To improve education, school safety, without increasing current tax rates; Repair leaky roofs, outdated plumbing, bathrooms, electrical, heating, ventilation systems; Repair, upgrade, acquire, construct local classrooms, facilities, schools, sites, technology; Improve student safety, security, communications/emergency systems; Replace portable classrooms with permanent facilities; Qualify for State matching funds; shall Central School District issue $49 million of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4803, "no_votes": 2620, "total_votes": 7423, "percent_yes": 64.70429745385962, "percent_no": 35.295702546140376, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.520647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.471377", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Elementary School Safety/Repair Measure: To improve education, school safety, without increasing current tax rates; Repair leaky roofs, outdated plumbing, bathrooms, electrical, heating, ventilation systems; Repair, upgrade, acquire, construct local classrooms, facilities, schools, sites, technology; Improve student safety, security, communications/emergency systems; Replace portable classrooms with permanent facilities; Qualify for State matching funds; shall Central School District issue $49 million of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7798, "fingerprint": "2006|200600370|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600370|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "11562cdad75188c2", "measure_id": "200600370", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2006-17 of the City of Hesperia be adopted, increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel / motel tax) from 7% to 10%, which is imposed upon travelers, to fund additional public safety, infrastructure and other City services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7274, "no_votes": 6253, "total_votes": 13527, "percent_yes": 53.773933614252975, "percent_no": 46.226066385747025, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.517812", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.469704", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2006-17 of the City of Hesperia be adopted, increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel / motel tax) from 7% to 10%, which is imposed upon travelers, to fund additional public safety, infrastructure and other City services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7785, "fingerprint": "2006|200600073|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600073|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "66081f6ace61c709", "measure_id": "200600073", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Initiative Ordinance 06-01, Reaffirming and Clarifying the Intent of Prior Initiative Measure N to Preserve the Density of Single Family Development in the Town, and reaffirming the Town\u2019s ability to amend the General Plan, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6681, "no_votes": 4610, "total_votes": 11291, "percent_yes": 59.17102116730138, "percent_no": 40.82897883269862, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.513947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.467266", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Initiative Ordinance 06-01, Reaffirming and Clarifying the Intent of Prior Initiative Measure N to Preserve the Density of Single Family Development in the Town, and reaffirming the Town\u2019s ability to amend the General Plan, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7795, "fingerprint": "2006|200600223|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600223|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f0b061569e2f9669", "measure_id": "200600223", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "COUNTY CHARTER AMENDMENT #37.  PROPOSED COUNTY CHARTER AMENDMENT NUMBER THIRTY-SEVEN TO LIMIT EMINENT DOMAIN AND PROTECT PROPERTY RIGHTS.  Shall the Charter of the County of San Bernardino be amended to prohibit the use of eminent domain by the County to acquire property from a private Owner, as defined, without such private Owner\u2019s consent, for the purpose of conveying the property so acquired to any private party?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 223845, "no_votes": 103684, "total_votes": 327529, "percent_yes": 68.34356652388033, "percent_no": 31.656433476119673, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.516932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.469147", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "COUNTY CHARTER AMENDMENT #37.  PROPOSED COUNTY CHARTER AMENDMENT NUMBER THIRTY-SEVEN TO LIMIT EMINENT DOMAIN AND PROTECT PROPERTY RIGHTS.  Shall the Charter of the County of San Bernardino be amended to prohibit the use of eminent domain by the County to acquire property from a private Owner, as defined, without such private Owner\u2019s consent, for the purpose of conveying the property so acquired to any private party?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7796, "fingerprint": "2006|200600224|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600224|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "41b2ff3329af7ffb", "measure_id": "200600224", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "COUNTY CHARTER AMENDMENT #38.  PROPOSED COUNTY CHARTER AMENDMENT NUMBER THIRTY-EIGHT TO ESTABLISH TERM LIMITS FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND TO ESTABLISH A REVISED FORMULA FOR DETERMINING SALARIES OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.  Shall the Charter of the County of San Bernardino be amended to establish term limits for members of the Board of Supervisors and to establish a revised formula for determining salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 182892, "no_votes": 140887, "total_votes": 323779, "percent_yes": 56.486677641230585, "percent_no": 43.513322358769415, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.517202", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.469335", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "COUNTY CHARTER AMENDMENT #38.  PROPOSED COUNTY CHARTER AMENDMENT NUMBER THIRTY-EIGHT TO ESTABLISH TERM LIMITS FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND TO ESTABLISH A REVISED FORMULA FOR DETERMINING SALARIES OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.  Shall the Charter of the County of San Bernardino be amended to establish term limits for members of the Board of Supervisors and to establish a revised formula for determining salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7801, "fingerprint": "2006|200600373|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600373|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "56b0eeec4a354375", "measure_id": "200600373", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "NEEDLES UTILITY ENTERPRISES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ACT. A Special Transactions and Use (Sales) Tax solely to provide funding for necessary capital improvements for the utility enterprises: Shall the sales tax be increased by one-quarter of one percent, automatically expiring in 10 years; to be administered by the California State Board of Equalization; with funds deposited into a restricted account guaranteeing future administrations cannot use the money for other purposes; and requiring annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 597, "no_votes": 405, "total_votes": 1002, "percent_yes": 59.58083832335329, "percent_no": 40.41916167664671, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.518888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.470272", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEEDLES UTILITY ENTERPRISES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ACT. A Special Transactions and Use (Sales) Tax solely to provide funding for necessary capital improvements for the utility enterprises: Shall the sales tax be increased by one-quarter of one percent, automatically expiring in 10 years; to be administered by the California State Board of Equalization; with funds deposited into a restricted account guaranteeing future administrations cannot use the money for other purposes; and requiring annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7802, "fingerprint": "2006|200600374|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600374|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f6b573b2d2045c85", "measure_id": "200600374", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "When an elective office becomes vacant.  Shall Section 402 of the Needles Charter be restated in its entirety to parallel state law when establishing criteria for determining when an elective office becomes vacant?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 747, "no_votes": 226, "total_votes": 973, "percent_yes": 76.77286742034943, "percent_no": 23.227132579650572, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.519240", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.470455", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "When an elective office becomes vacant.  Shall Section 402 of the Needles Charter be restated in its entirety to parallel state law when establishing criteria for determining when an elective office becomes vacant?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7803, "fingerprint": "2006|200600375|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600375|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "60df1c5a3c7d779a", "measure_id": "200600375", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Mayor; term of office.  Shall Section 450 of the Needles Charter be amended to delete the requirement that the mayor may not serve more than 4 successive terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 458, "no_votes": 540, "total_votes": 998, "percent_yes": 45.89178356713427, "percent_no": 54.10821643286573, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.519526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.470642", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Mayor; term of office.  Shall Section 450 of the Needles Charter be amended to delete the requirement that the mayor may not serve more than 4 successive terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7804, "fingerprint": "2006|200600376|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600376|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b611dc9892ab66d6", "measure_id": "200600376", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Contracts on public works.  Shall Sec. 1109 of the Needles Charter be amended to provide that public works projects above fifteen thousand dollars shall be let to the lowest responsible bidder?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 717, "no_votes": 274, "total_votes": 991, "percent_yes": 72.35116044399597, "percent_no": 27.648839556004035, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.519811", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.470821", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Contracts on public works.  Shall Sec. 1109 of the Needles Charter be amended to provide that public works projects above fifteen thousand dollars shall be let to the lowest responsible bidder?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7799, "fingerprint": "2006|200600371|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600371|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6c742e70a3ca0ae2", "measure_id": "200600371", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the South Hills Protection Measure, imposing development controls for the South Hills area of the City of Loma Linda as part of the Growth Management Element of the Loma Linda General Plan, and establishing specific policies and procedures for 1) acquisition and preservation of recreational trails and open space, 2) controlling development on north-facing slopes and primary ridgelines, and capping the number of residential units, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1908, "no_votes": 2113, "total_votes": 4021, "percent_yes": 47.45088286495896, "percent_no": 52.54911713504104, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.518319", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.469888", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the South Hills Protection Measure, imposing development controls for the South Hills area of the City of Loma Linda as part of the Growth Management Element of the Loma Linda General Plan, and establishing specific policies and procedures for 1) acquisition and preservation of recreational trails and open space, 2) controlling development on north-facing slopes and primary ridgelines, and capping the number of residential units, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7800, "fingerprint": "2006|200600372|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600372|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "e5abc9f6e9627a17", "measure_id": "200600372", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the initiative entitled \u201cResidential and Hillside Development Control Measure,\u201d imposing development controls in the South Hills area of Loma Linda and residential development controls throughout the City of Loma Linda (with certain exemptions for institutions affiliated with the Loma Linda University Adventist Health Sciences Center from traffic level of service requirements, building height limits and maximum residential density restrictions) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2132, "no_votes": 1911, "total_votes": 4043, "percent_yes": 52.73311897106109, "percent_no": 47.26688102893891, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.518614", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.470076", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the initiative entitled \u201cResidential and Hillside Development Control Measure,\u201d imposing development controls in the South Hills area of Loma Linda and residential development controls throughout the City of Loma Linda (with certain exemptions for institutions affiliated with the Loma Linda University Adventist Health Sciences Center from traffic level of service requirements, building height limits and maximum residential density restrictions) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7797, "fingerprint": "2006|200600369|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600369|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "82a364f488f5ffd9", "measure_id": "200600369", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative entitled, \u2018City Revenue Limitation and Reporting Initiative\u2019 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1639, "no_votes": 1997, "total_votes": 3636, "percent_yes": 45.07700770077008, "percent_no": 54.92299229922992, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.517485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.469519", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative entitled, \u2018City Revenue Limitation and Reporting Initiative\u2019 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7808, "fingerprint": "2006|200600514|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600514|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "eabffa4175e77ba9", "measure_id": "200600514", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Victor Valley College Job Training/Repair Measure. To improve education and prepare Victor Valley College students for high demand jobs and university transfer, shall Victor Valley Community College District improve campus safety, repair, expand educational facilities, including classrooms for nursing, emergency medical, police, firefighting careers, upgrade aging plumbing, ventilating, roofing, electrical, safety systems, acquire sites, equipment, construct new educational facilities, by issuing $338 million in bonds, at legal rates with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32763, "no_votes": 29011, "total_votes": 61774, "percent_yes": 53.036876355748376, "percent_no": 46.963123644251624, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.520932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.471572", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Victor Valley College Job Training/Repair Measure. To improve education and prepare Victor Valley College students for high demand jobs and university transfer, shall Victor Valley Community College District improve campus safety, repair, expand educational facilities, including classrooms for nursing, emergency medical, police, firefighting careers, upgrade aging plumbing, ventilating, roofing, electrical, safety systems, acquire sites, equipment, construct new educational facilities, by issuing $338 million in bonds, at legal rates with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7805, "fingerprint": "2006|200600377|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600377|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2ae52206a795c05f", "measure_id": "200600377", "measure_letter": "YY", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Advisory vote only.  If Measure Z is approved by the voters, shall the proceeds of Measure Z be used only to fund more police officers and support personnel, and to fund anti-gang and anti-crime operations, including drug resistance education and supervised after-school youth activities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19023, "no_votes": 6303, "total_votes": 25326, "percent_yes": 75.11253257521913, "percent_no": 24.887467424780866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.520082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.471004", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Advisory vote only.  If Measure Z is approved by the voters, shall the proceeds of Measure Z be used only to fund more police officers and support personnel, and to fund anti-gang and anti-crime operations, including drug resistance education and supervised after-school youth activities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7806, "fingerprint": "2006|200600378|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600378|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "172236aae3412459", "measure_id": "200600378", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) To fund more police officers, anti-gang and anti-crime operations, and other urgent general fund programs, and provided it shall be guaranteed to sunset after 15 years, and provided a Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee is created to report annually to voters on the use of proceeds, shall an Ordinance be adopted to impose a 1/4 of a cent transaction and use (sales) tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17308, "no_votes": 8540, "total_votes": 25848, "percent_yes": 66.96069328381307, "percent_no": 33.03930671618693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.520359", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.471184", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) To fund more police officers, anti-gang and anti-crime operations, and other urgent general fund programs, and provided it shall be guaranteed to sunset after 15 years, and provided a Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee is created to report annually to voters on the use of proceeds, shall an Ordinance be adopted to impose a 1/4 of a cent transaction and use (sales) tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11701, "fingerprint": "2006|200600227|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600227|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "72c87b72176d08c8", "measure_id": "200600227", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide for San Diego's long-term air transportation needs, shall the Airport Authority and government officials work to obtain approximately 3,000 of 23,000 acres at MCAS Miramar by 2020 for a commercial airport provided necessary traffic and freeway improvements are made, military readiness is maintained without expense to the military for modifying or relocating operations, no local taxes are used on the airport, overall noise impacts are reduced, and necessary Lindbergh Field improvements are completed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 278470, "no_votes": 451097, "total_votes": 729567, "percent_yes": 38.16921543874654, "percent_no": 61.83078456125346, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.518841", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.523718", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.473228", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide for San Diego's long-term air transportation needs, shall the Airport Authority and government officials work to obtain approximately 3,000 of 23,000 acres at MCAS Miramar by 2020 for a commercial airport provided necessary traffic and freeway improvements are made, military readiness is maintained without expense to the military for modifying or relocating operations, no local taxes are used on the airport, overall noise impacts are reduced, and necessary Lindbergh Field improvements are completed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7809, "fingerprint": "2006|200600039|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600039|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7c4f18caf4195f4f", "measure_id": "200600039", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the San Diego County Charter be amended for purposes of making \"clean-up\" amendments to several sections of the Charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 308954, "no_votes": 119585, "total_votes": 428539, "percent_yes": 72.09472183395211, "percent_no": 27.905278166047893, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.521306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.471764", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Diego County Charter be amended for purposes of making \"clean-up\" amendments to several sections of the Charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11705, "fingerprint": "2006|200600385|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600385|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "8026313a9a2c63e3", "measure_id": "200600385", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to require voter approval for any increases in retirement system benefits for public employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 214788, "no_votes": 92302, "total_votes": 307090, "percent_yes": 69.94301344882608, "percent_no": 30.05698655117392, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.520221", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.525730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.474502", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to require voter approval for any increases in retirement system benefits for public employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7810, "fingerprint": "2006|200600040|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600040|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "73edb64e97848919", "measure_id": "200600040", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the San Diego County Charter be amended to allow \"write-in\" candidates to participate in primary elections, but not in general elections, for County Supervisor and for other County elected offices?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 241225, "no_votes": 196646, "total_votes": 437871, "percent_yes": 55.09042617574582, "percent_no": 44.90957382425418, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.521592", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.471944", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Diego County Charter be amended to allow \"write-in\" candidates to participate in primary elections, but not in general elections, for County Supervisor and for other County elected offices?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11706, "fingerprint": "2006|200600386|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600386|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "764cd518cbb7fd29", "measure_id": "200600386", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow the City to contract services traditionally performed by City civil service employees if determined to be more economical and efficient while maintaining the quality of services and protecting the public interest?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 185688, "no_votes": 121906, "total_votes": 307594, "percent_yes": 60.367887540069056, "percent_no": 39.632112459930944, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.520418", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.525996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.474687", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow the City to contract services traditionally performed by City civil service employees if determined to be more economical and efficient while maintaining the quality of services and protecting the public interest?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7811, "fingerprint": "2006|200600078|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600078|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "18e5e966df105e6d", "measure_id": "200600078", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of Chula Vista be amended to limit the ability of the City Council to utilize the tool of eminent domain to take property to address economic blighting conditions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20216, "no_votes": 7176, "total_votes": 27392, "percent_yes": 73.80257009345794, "percent_no": 26.197429906542055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.521867", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.472124", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of Chula Vista be amended to limit the ability of the City Council to utilize the tool of eminent domain to take property to address economic blighting conditions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11702, "fingerprint": "2006|200600379|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600379|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "789342c1c187b008", "measure_id": "200600379", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Carlsbad General Plan be amended to incorporate provisions of the \"Preserve the Flower and Strawberry Fields and Save Carlsbad Taxpayers' Money\" Measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17016, "no_votes": 16695, "total_votes": 33711, "percent_yes": 50.47610572216784, "percent_no": 49.52389427783216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.519038", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.524038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.473409", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Carlsbad General Plan be amended to incorporate provisions of the \"Preserve the Flower and Strawberry Fields and Save Carlsbad Taxpayers' Money\" Measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7812, "fingerprint": "2006|200600079|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600079|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "45f607948642052d", "measure_id": "200600079", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved imposing a one percent transactions and use tax (a sales tax) for up to 10 years for City services, facilities and programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2993, "no_votes": 2079, "total_votes": 5072, "percent_yes": 59.01025236593061, "percent_no": 40.98974763406939, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.522135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.472304", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved imposing a one percent transactions and use tax (a sales tax) for up to 10 years for City services, facilities and programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11703, "fingerprint": "2006|200600380|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600380|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e181b22ca6f2dd9a", "measure_id": "200600380", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Carlsbad General Plan be amended to incorporate provisions of the \"Save the Strawberry and Flower Growing Fields Act of 2006\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16840, "no_votes": 16896, "total_votes": 33736, "percent_yes": 49.91700260848944, "percent_no": 50.08299739151056, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.519237", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.524309", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.473595", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Carlsbad General Plan be amended to incorporate provisions of the \"Save the Strawberry and Flower Growing Fields Act of 2006\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7813, "fingerprint": "2006|200600080|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600080|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ff6668a6f43573aa", "measure_id": "200600080", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City increase the transient occupancy tax (TOT) paid by hotel and motel visitors from 10% to 13% over a three-year period, and shall two-thirds of the increased TOT revenue be allocated to Sand Replenishment/Retention and Coastal Access Capital Projects, and shall one-third of the increased TOT revenue be allocated to Coastal Area Business/Visitor Assistance and Enhancements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2608, "no_votes": 1206, "total_votes": 3814, "percent_yes": 68.37965390665968, "percent_no": 31.620346093340316, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.522403", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.472486", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the transient occupancy tax (TOT) paid by hotel and motel visitors from 10% to 13% over a three-year period, and shall two-thirds of the increased TOT revenue be allocated to Sand Replenishment/Retention and Coastal Access Capital Projects, and shall one-third of the increased TOT revenue be allocated to Coastal Area Business/Visitor Assistance and Enhancements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7817, "fingerprint": "2006|200600381|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600381|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "466f92adfd04bc01", "measure_id": "200600381", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do voters authorize the potential development, construction and/or acquisition of up to 1,600 affordable low-income rental housing units throughout the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23713, "no_votes": 18639, "total_votes": 42352, "percent_yes": 55.99027200604458, "percent_no": 44.00972799395542, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.524598", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.473775", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do voters authorize the potential development, construction and/or acquisition of up to 1,600 affordable low-income rental housing units throughout the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7818, "fingerprint": "2006|200600382|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600382|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1faa30b6d36d737d", "measure_id": "200600382", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Chula Vista Charter be amended to state that any person appointed to the office of Mayor or Council shall be prohibited from seeking election to the same office for a period of one year following the end of the appointed term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22486, "no_votes": 18475, "total_votes": 40961, "percent_yes": 54.896120700178216, "percent_no": 45.103879299821784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.524921", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.473960", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Chula Vista Charter be amended to state that any person appointed to the office of Mayor or Council shall be prohibited from seeking election to the same office for a period of one year following the end of the appointed term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11704, "fingerprint": "2006|200600383|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600383|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f4b40a21a4bb7a7f", "measure_id": "200600383", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Chula Vista Charter be amended to change the procedures for filling an unanticipated Mayoral or City Council vacancy when more than one year remains in the term: specifically, when more than one year remains, the seat must be filled by special election; when one year or less remains, the seat may be filled by Council appointment within 45 days, or if no appointment, be left vacant?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26588, "no_votes": 13943, "total_votes": 40531, "percent_yes": 65.59917100490982, "percent_no": 34.40082899509018, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.519827", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.525190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.474141", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Chula Vista Charter be amended to change the procedures for filling an unanticipated Mayoral or City Council vacancy when more than one year remains in the term: specifically, when more than one year remains, the seat must be filled by special election; when one year or less remains, the seat may be filled by Council appointment within 45 days, or if no appointment, be left vacant?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7814, "fingerprint": "2006|200600161|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600161|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9bbbafea5be4f999", "measure_id": "200600161", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce school overcrowding, improve education and safety for our children, improve community traffic and parking, and maximize state funding, shall the Rancho Santa Fe School District issue $44,500,000 of bonds at legal rates to acquire approximately 7 acres of property at Aliso Canyon and Via Del Charro, to construct and equip a new K-6 elementary school there, and appoint a Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee to perform financial audits and protect taxpayers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1506, "no_votes": 1419, "total_votes": 2925, "percent_yes": 51.48717948717949, "percent_no": 48.51282051282051, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.522778", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.472672", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce school overcrowding, improve education and safety for our children, improve community traffic and parking, and maximize state funding, shall the Rancho Santa Fe School District issue $44,500,000 of bonds at legal rates to acquire approximately 7 acres of property at Aliso Canyon and Via Del Charro, to construct and equip a new K-6 elementary school there, and appoint a Citizen\u2019s Oversight Committee to perform financial audits and protect taxpayers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7819, "fingerprint": "2006|200600384|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600384|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f568c94732166cfe", "measure_id": "200600384", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to redesignate all parcels currently zoned R-1B (Single Family Residential) to R-1A(E) (Single Family Residential), and to invalidate any existing permits for construction in the R-1B zone issued after January 18, 2006, where such improvements do not conform to the development standards for an R-1A(E) parcel be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3394, "no_votes": 3387, "total_votes": 6781, "percent_yes": 50.0516148060758, "percent_no": 49.9483851939242, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.525459", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.474322", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to redesignate all parcels currently zoned R-1B (Single Family Residential) to R-1A(E) (Single Family Residential), and to invalidate any existing permits for construction in the R-1B zone issued after January 18, 2006, where such improvements do not conform to the development standards for an R-1A(E) parcel be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7820, "fingerprint": "2006|200600387|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600387|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f770f32bd8d5771f", "measure_id": "200600387", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending Title 2, Chapter 2.08, Section 2.08.030(a) of the San Marcos Municipal Code to provide that each member of the City Council including the Mayor, shall receive a salary in the amount of $1,500 per month?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5804, "no_votes": 9679, "total_votes": 15483, "percent_yes": 37.48627526965058, "percent_no": 62.51372473034942, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.526320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.474872", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending Title 2, Chapter 2.08, Section 2.08.030(a) of the San Marcos Municipal Code to provide that each member of the City Council including the Mayor, shall receive a salary in the amount of $1,500 per month?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7821, "fingerprint": "2006|200600388|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600388|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a9f1aca5f06edfef", "measure_id": "200600388", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To enhance safety and vital city services including, but not limited to, reducing 9-1-1 emergency response times by hiring additional police officers and firefighters/paramedics, building new fire stations, replacing the decayed city hall, repairing streets and potholes, adding youth sports fields, and other general city services, shall the ordinance be adopted increasing the city general sales tax by one-half cent, with guaranteed independent annual financial audits and legally required to end after 30 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9284, "no_votes": 7917, "total_votes": 17201, "percent_yes": 53.97360618568688, "percent_no": 46.02639381431312, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.526624", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.475053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance safety and vital city services including, but not limited to, reducing 9-1-1 emergency response times by hiring additional police officers and firefighters/paramedics, building new fire stations, replacing the decayed city hall, repairing streets and potholes, adding youth sports fields, and other general city services, shall the ordinance be adopted increasing the city general sales tax by one-half cent, with guaranteed independent annual financial audits and legally required to end after 30 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7823, "fingerprint": "2006|200600516|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600516|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "44cdc03e5079a387", "measure_id": "200600516", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare Palomar College students for university transfer and high demand jobs, shall Palomar Community College District repair/upgrade aging educational facilities, including classrooms for nursing, emergency medical, and public safety careers, science and high-tech computer labs, outdated plumbing, ventilating, roofing, energy, electrical and safety systems, acquire sites and equipment, and construct new educational facilities, by issuing $694 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and no proceeds used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 103380, "no_votes": 75163, "total_votes": 178543, "percent_yes": 57.9020180012658, "percent_no": 42.0979819987342, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.527164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.475419", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare Palomar College students for university transfer and high demand jobs, shall Palomar Community College District repair/upgrade aging educational facilities, including classrooms for nursing, emergency medical, and public safety careers, science and high-tech computer labs, outdated plumbing, ventilating, roofing, energy, electrical and safety systems, acquire sites and equipment, and construct new educational facilities, by issuing $694 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, and no proceeds used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7824, "fingerprint": "2006|200600517|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600517|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "919733e4c2c3bc26", "measure_id": "200600517", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare San Diego community college students for 4-year universities and quality jobs, shall San Diego Community College District upgrade existing educational facilities, including renovating classrooms for nursing, police, paramedic, and firefighting careers, upgrade science and high-tech training labs; repair aging roofs, electrical and safety systems; and construct and equip facilities and sites; by issuing $870 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrative salaries, and maintain current tax rate limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 149399, "no_votes": 87606, "total_votes": 237005, "percent_yes": 63.03622286449653, "percent_no": 36.96377713550347, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.527429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.475696", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare San Diego community college students for 4-year universities and quality jobs, shall San Diego Community College District upgrade existing educational facilities, including renovating classrooms for nursing, police, paramedic, and firefighting careers, upgrade science and high-tech training labs; repair aging roofs, electrical and safety systems; and construct and equip facilities and sites; by issuing $870 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, mandatory audits, no money for administrative salaries, and maintain current tax rate limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7826, "fingerprint": "2006|200600519|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600519|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b6a4265e7ae62114", "measure_id": "200600519", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve learning/safety at every Sweetwater Union High School District campus by repairing/earthquake retrofitting classrooms/restrooms; installing upgraded fire safety systems, security fencing, safety lighting; upgrading science labs/computer technology; improving handicap accessibility; replacing leaky roofs, heating/air conditioning, outdated plumbing; removing asbestos, mold, and lead paint; shall the District issue $644 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, independent annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48916, "no_votes": 23586, "total_votes": 72502, "percent_yes": 67.46848362803784, "percent_no": 32.531516371962155, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.528043", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.476301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve learning/safety at every Sweetwater Union High School District campus by repairing/earthquake retrofitting classrooms/restrooms; installing upgraded fire safety systems, security fencing, safety lighting; upgrading science labs/computer technology; improving handicap accessibility; replacing leaky roofs, heating/air conditioning, outdated plumbing; removing asbestos, mold, and lead paint; shall the District issue $644 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, independent annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7822, "fingerprint": "2006|200600515|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600515|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "128f4c7ae6f5b5ee", "measure_id": "200600515", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/replace old, worn-out plumbing and restrooms, construct new classrooms, build a new high school, upgrade electrical systems and wiring for instructional computer technology and repair or replace aging, inefficient heating, ventilation and air conditioning at school facilities, improve/acquire property and support facilities and access State matching funds, shall Carlsbad Unified School District issue $198 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and annual audits and no funding for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16250, "no_votes": 7272, "total_votes": 23522, "percent_yes": 69.08426154238585, "percent_no": 30.915738457614154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.526895", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.475235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/replace old, worn-out plumbing and restrooms, construct new classrooms, build a new high school, upgrade electrical systems and wiring for instructional computer technology and repair or replace aging, inefficient heating, ventilation and air conditioning at school facilities, improve/acquire property and support facilities and access State matching funds, shall Carlsbad Unified School District issue $198 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizens' oversight and annual audits and no funding for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7825, "fingerprint": "2006|200600518|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600518|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "397a9936aae874b0", "measure_id": "200600518", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Santee School District modernize classroom facilities, upgrade safety systems, enhance technology, improve traffic flow, and indoor/outdoor learning spaces, provide improved access for persons with disabilities, enhance technology and science lab facilities, and provide additional classrooms by issuing $60,000,000 of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, independent audits, and no money for salaries or administration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9742, "no_votes": 6907, "total_votes": 16649, "percent_yes": 58.51402486635834, "percent_no": 41.48597513364166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.527742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.475999", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Santee School District modernize classroom facilities, upgrade safety systems, enhance technology, improve traffic flow, and indoor/outdoor learning spaces, provide improved access for persons with disabilities, enhance technology and science lab facilities, and provide additional classrooms by issuing $60,000,000 of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit, with a citizens\u2019 oversight committee, independent audits, and no money for salaries or administration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7816, "fingerprint": "2006|200600226|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600226|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b46fe560a2f019a2", "measure_id": "200600226", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Rincon Ranch Community Services District be authorized to establish and levy a special tax override, for a period of 10 years, on all taxable real property within its boundaries for the purpose of providing funds for repair and resurface of the roads maintained by the district, with this special tax not to exceed five dollars and twenty cents ($5.20) per acre, or portion thereof, plus one hundred fifty dollars ($150) per parcel of land per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40, "no_votes": 20, "total_votes": 60, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.523406", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.473044", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Rincon Ranch Community Services District be authorized to establish and levy a special tax override, for a period of 10 years, on all taxable real property within its boundaries for the purpose of providing funds for repair and resurface of the roads maintained by the district, with this special tax not to exceed five dollars and twenty cents ($5.20) per acre, or portion thereof, plus one hundred fifty dollars ($150) per parcel of land per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7815, "fingerprint": "2006|200600225|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600225|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d78ab36214e322a0", "measure_id": "200600225", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the existing Boulevard Sponsor Group be disbanded and a Boulevard Planning Group be created consisting of seven members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 335, "no_votes": 110, "total_votes": 445, "percent_yes": 75.28089887640449, "percent_no": 24.719101123595507, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.523065", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.472864", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing Boulevard Sponsor Group be disbanded and a Boulevard Planning Group be created consisting of seven members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11710, "fingerprint": "2006|200600520|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600520|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6393714584fa27a7", "measure_id": "200600520", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the San Francisco Unified School District modernize and repair up to 64 additional school facilities to health, safety, instructional and accessibility standards, and where applicable, replace portable trailers with permanent classrooms; upgrade bathrooms, science labs, plumbing, electrical and other building systems; replace heating and ventilation systems; and renovate classrooms, with proceeds from the issuance of up to $450,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, and citizens' oversight to monitor expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 171236, "no_votes": 60640, "total_votes": 231876, "percent_yes": 73.84809122116994, "percent_no": 26.151908778830062, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.525665", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.532256", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.480775", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Francisco Unified School District modernize and repair up to 64 additional school facilities to health, safety, instructional and accessibility standards, and where applicable, replace portable trailers with permanent classrooms; upgrade bathrooms, science labs, plumbing, electrical and other building systems; replace heating and ventilation systems; and renovate classrooms, with proceeds from the issuance of up to $450,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, and citizens' oversight to monitor expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7827, "fingerprint": "2006|200600041|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600041|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0f0b9d87ff80a170", "measure_id": "200600041", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City allocate an additional $10 million primarily from the City's General Fund for each of the next three fiscal years for violence prevention and intervention services, establish a Homicide Prevention Planning Council to develop and annually revise a Homicide Prevention Plan, and create a Survivors' Advocate and a Survivors' Fund in the Office of the District Attorney?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66982, "no_votes": 69060, "total_votes": 136042, "percent_yes": 49.23626527101924, "percent_no": 50.76373472898076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.528311", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.476667", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City allocate an additional $10 million primarily from the City's General Fund for each of the next three fiscal years for violence prevention and intervention services, establish a Homicide Prevention Planning Council to develop and annually revise a Homicide Prevention Plan, and create a Survivors' Advocate and a Survivors' Fund in the Office of the District Attorney?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11707, "fingerprint": "2006|200600228|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600228|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ff5d1028599df5d9", "measure_id": "200600228", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors adopt a parental leave policy that permits its members and members of all City boards and commissions to participate in meetings by teleconference when the member is not able to attend in person due to pregnancy, child birth or a related condition?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 164166, "no_votes": 63157, "total_votes": 227323, "percent_yes": 72.21706558509257, "percent_no": 27.78293441490743, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.523252", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.529400", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.477970", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors adopt a parental leave policy that permits its members and members of all City boards and commissions to participate in meetings by teleconference when the member is not able to attend in person due to pregnancy, child birth or a related condition?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7828, "fingerprint": "2006|200600042|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600042|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "de66ab0d572ed744", "measure_id": "200600042", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City change its laws to require landlords who offer to sell buildings of two or more residential units to disclose to all potential buyers the specific legal grounds for any evictions that result in vacant units at the time of sale and whether the evicted tenants were elderly or disabled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71440, "no_votes": 65373, "total_votes": 136813, "percent_yes": 52.21726005569646, "percent_no": 47.78273994430354, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.528587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.477069", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change its laws to require landlords who offer to sell buildings of two or more residential units to disclose to all potential buyers the specific legal grounds for any evictions that result in vacant units at the time of sale and whether the evicted tenants were elderly or disabled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11708, "fingerprint": "2006|200600229|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600229|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "aae23d4801b81829", "measure_id": "200600229", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Civil Service Commission set the salaries of the Mayor, City Attorney, District Attorney, Public Defender, Assessor-Recorder, Treasurer, and Sheriff based on the average salary paid to comparable officials in other Bay Area counties?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140561, "no_votes": 81396, "total_votes": 221957, "percent_yes": 63.3280320061994, "percent_no": 36.6719679938006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.523528", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.529680", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.478293", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Civil Service Commission set the salaries of the Mayor, City Attorney, District Attorney, Public Defender, Assessor-Recorder, Treasurer, and Sheriff based on the average salary paid to comparable officials in other Bay Area counties?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7829, "fingerprint": "2006|200600043|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600043|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "64586b35d85f99ad", "measure_id": "200600043", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City change the appointment process for the City's three representatives to the Transbay Joint Powers Authority by specifically designating the Mayor and two members of the Board of Supervisors to represent the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37030, "no_votes": 93905, "total_votes": 130935, "percent_yes": 28.28120823309276, "percent_no": 71.71879176690724, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.528855", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.477367", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change the appointment process for the City's three representatives to the Transbay Joint Powers Authority by specifically designating the Mayor and two members of the Board of Supervisors to represent the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11709, "fingerprint": "2006|200600230|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600230|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3f3848f4b8c54582", "measure_id": "200600230", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City and the City's contractors be prohibited from disclosing private information about individuals except under limited circumstances?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143020, "no_votes": 79230, "total_votes": 222250, "percent_yes": 64.3509561304837, "percent_no": 35.649043869516305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.523830", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.529945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.478571", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City and the City's contractors be prohibited from disclosing private information about individuals except under limited circumstances?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7830, "fingerprint": "2006|200600044|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600044|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "97a46c91a8a64325", "measure_id": "200600044", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City amend the Planning Code to create the \"Laguna Honda Hospital Special Use District\" that includes the site of Laguna Honda Hospital, limit the patients who can receive services at Laguna Honda Hospital and certain other residential health care facilities, and allow both publicly and privately-owned residential health care facilities in \"public\" districts throughout San Francisco?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35418, "no_votes": 99060, "total_votes": 134478, "percent_yes": 26.33739347699995, "percent_no": 73.66260652300005, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.529123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.477693", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City amend the Planning Code to create the \"Laguna Honda Hospital Special Use District\" that includes the site of Laguna Honda Hospital, limit the patients who can receive services at Laguna Honda Hospital and certain other residential health care facilities, and allow both publicly and privately-owned residential health care facilities in \"public\" districts throughout San Francisco?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7831, "fingerprint": "2006|200600231|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600231|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "dc9bb5b06fc9e0b5", "measure_id": "200600231", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City's parking tax be increased from 25 percent to 35 percent and apply to valet parking services even if the valet company does not pay for the property where it parks the cars?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73922, "no_votes": 151628, "total_votes": 225550, "percent_yes": 32.77410773664376, "percent_no": 67.22589226335624, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.530247", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.478852", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's parking tax be increased from 25 percent to 35 percent and apply to valet parking services even if the valet company does not pay for the property where it parks the cars?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7832, "fingerprint": "2006|200600232|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600232|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f4b6fcada2a433bf", "measure_id": "200600232", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall employers be required to provide paid sick leave to their employees working in San Francisco?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 139005, "no_votes": 89057, "total_votes": 228062, "percent_yes": 60.95053099595725, "percent_no": 39.04946900404275, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.530552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.479127", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall employers be required to provide paid sick leave to their employees working in San Francisco?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7833, "fingerprint": "2006|200600233|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600233|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3b7355fed3afa143", "measure_id": "200600233", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall formula retail use stores be required to get a conditional use authorization from the Planning Commission before opening in any Neighborhood Commercial District where formula retail use is currently permitted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125728, "no_votes": 90353, "total_votes": 216081, "percent_yes": 58.18558781197791, "percent_no": 41.81441218802209, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.530818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.479396", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall formula retail use stores be required to get a conditional use authorization from the Planning Commission before opening in any Neighborhood Commercial District where formula retail use is currently permitted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7834, "fingerprint": "2006|200600234|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600234|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "980d8339b1d294b4", "measure_id": "200600234", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall landlords be required to provide relocation payments to eligible residential tenants who are evicted through no fault of their own?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120916, "no_votes": 107541, "total_votes": 228457, "percent_yes": 52.92724670288062, "percent_no": 47.07275329711938, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.531084", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.479670", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall landlords be required to provide relocation payments to eligible residential tenants who are evicted through no fault of their own?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7835, "fingerprint": "2006|200600235|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600235|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ea3d1ad7ac3d413b", "measure_id": "200600235", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to urge the Mayor to appear in person at one regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors each month to engage in formal policy discussions with members of the Board?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126023, "no_votes": 97567, "total_votes": 223590, "percent_yes": 56.36343306945749, "percent_no": 43.63656693054251, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.531351", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.479945", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to urge the Mayor to appear in person at one regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors each month to engage in formal policy discussions with members of the Board?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7836, "fingerprint": "2006|200600236|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600236|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a178b3442682f9fc", "measure_id": "200600236", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to call for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 133042, "no_votes": 94282, "total_votes": 227324, "percent_yes": 58.52527669757702, "percent_no": 41.47472330242298, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.531666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.480220", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to call for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7837, "fingerprint": "2006|200600237|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600237|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "32cdf6e77f3eab65", "measure_id": "200600237", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to acknowledge the particular housing needs of seniors and disabled adults with limited financial resources and to explore ways of addressing these needs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 161684, "no_votes": 65073, "total_votes": 226757, "percent_yes": 71.30276022349916, "percent_no": 28.697239776500837, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.531938", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.480498", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to acknowledge the particular housing needs of seniors and disabled adults with limited financial resources and to explore ways of addressing these needs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7849, "fingerprint": "2006|200600522|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600522|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "63affd90c297959f", "measure_id": "200600522", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District construct, acquire, renovate and repair classrooms and school facilities including vocational and multi-purpose classrooms, and a new elementary school; improve student safety and handicap accessibility; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and become eligible for State matching funds by issuing $37.5 million in bonds with legal interest rates with annual audits, spending reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30, "no_votes": 40, "total_votes": 70, "percent_yes": 42.85714285714285, "percent_no": 57.14285714285715, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.535750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.484168", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District construct, acquire, renovate and repair classrooms and school facilities including vocational and multi-purpose classrooms, and a new elementary school; improve student safety and handicap accessibility; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and become eligible for State matching funds by issuing $37.5 million in bonds with legal interest rates with annual audits, spending reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7838, "fingerprint": "2006|200600081|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600081|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "5cbc7a8e99e303bc", "measure_id": "200600081", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Stockton adopt a Charter amendment to delete section 2504\u2013Adoption and Induction of Incumbents into Civil Service; section 2505\u2013Applications; section 2506\u2013Establishment of Reemployment Lists; section 2511\u2013Leave of Absence; section 2512\u2013Temporary Appointments; section 2526\u2013Sick Leave; section 2529\u2013Vacation Time; section 2530\u2013Vacation Ratio for Police Department; and section 2532\u2013Full-Time Performance of Duties", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14022, "no_votes": 12134, "total_votes": 26156, "percent_yes": 53.60911454350818, "percent_no": 46.39088545649182, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.532620", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.481054", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Stockton adopt a Charter amendment to delete section 2504\u2013Adoption and Induction of Incumbents into Civil Service; section 2505\u2013Applications; section 2506\u2013Establishment of Reemployment Lists; section 2511\u2013Leave of Absence; section 2512\u2013Temporary Appointments; section 2526\u2013Sick Leave; section 2529\u2013Vacation Time; section 2530\u2013Vacation Ratio for Police Department; and section 2532\u2013Full-Time Performance of Duties", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7841, "fingerprint": "2006|200600163|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600163|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "6f94866aeaa15a69", "measure_id": "200600163", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize Tracy High School, including replacing aging plumbing, updating electrical and safety systems, renovating and building new classrooms, and to complete Merrill West High School, shall Tracy Joint Unified School District be authorized to pay or reimburse the cost to construct, replace, renovate, equip and furnish school facilities, issue $51,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with no funds for administrator salaries, and appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7204, "no_votes": 3404, "total_votes": 10608, "percent_yes": 67.91101055806938, "percent_no": 32.08898944193062, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.533504", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.481906", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize Tracy High School, including replacing aging plumbing, updating electrical and safety systems, renovating and building new classrooms, and to complete Merrill West High School, shall Tracy Joint Unified School District be authorized to pay or reimburse the cost to construct, replace, renovate, equip and furnish school facilities, issue $51,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with no funds for administrator salaries, and appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7839, "fingerprint": "2006|200600082|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600082|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "e4a93b4bb01da23e", "measure_id": "200600082", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Stockton be amended to provide that a recall election will be held unless the officer sought to be recalled resigns within five calendar days after the City Clerk serves written notice of the certificate of sufficiency; to specify that a special election to recall an officer be held in accordance with the timelines specified in the California Elections Code; and to incorporate other nonsubstantive, grammatical changes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17873, "no_votes": 8952, "total_votes": 26825, "percent_yes": 66.62814538676608, "percent_no": 33.37185461323392, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.532926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.481344", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Stockton be amended to provide that a recall election will be held unless the officer sought to be recalled resigns within five calendar days after the City Clerk serves written notice of the certificate of sufficiency; to specify that a special election to recall an officer be held in accordance with the timelines specified in the California Elections Code; and to incorporate other nonsubstantive, grammatical changes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7843, "fingerprint": "2006|200600389|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600389|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c02dee0822f2fc38", "measure_id": "200600389", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance establishing a ten-year one quarter cent transactions and use (sales) tax for the limited purpose of the implementation, construction, maintenance, and operation of the following prioritized projects: 1) placing paramedics on fire engines; 2) design and construction of Fire Station Number Five; 3) construction of the Lodi Aquatics Center; 4) design and construction of a replacement for Fire Station Number Two; and 5) construction of an Indoor Sports Center be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7109, "no_votes": 9103, "total_votes": 16212, "percent_yes": 43.85023439427584, "percent_no": 56.14976560572416, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.534045", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.482466", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance establishing a ten-year one quarter cent transactions and use (sales) tax for the limited purpose of the implementation, construction, maintenance, and operation of the following prioritized projects: 1) placing paramedics on fire engines; 2) design and construction of Fire Station Number Five; 3) construction of the Lodi Aquatics Center; 4) design and construction of a replacement for Fire Station Number Two; and 5) construction of an Indoor Sports Center be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7844, "fingerprint": "2006|200600390|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600390|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "cdcf4cf5ff9aaefa", "measure_id": "200600390", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance rescinding Resolution No. 2005-203 entitled, \"A Resolution of the Lodi City Council establishing water rates\" be passed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5647, "no_votes": 9988, "total_votes": 15635, "percent_yes": 36.11768468180364, "percent_no": 63.88231531819636, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.534345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.482747", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance rescinding Resolution No. 2005-203 entitled, \"A Resolution of the Lodi City Council establishing water rates\" be passed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7845, "fingerprint": "2006|200600391|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600391|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "40895919f08c1931", "measure_id": "200600391", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Resolution establishing low-income discounts for water and sewer services be passed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9358, "no_votes": 6706, "total_votes": 16064, "percent_yes": 58.25448207171314, "percent_no": 41.74551792828686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.534649", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.483032", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Resolution establishing low-income discounts for water and sewer services be passed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7842, "fingerprint": "2006|200600238|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600238|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c477bb4d97c1ed94", "measure_id": "200600238", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the San Joaquin County Transportation Authority be authorized to relieve traffic congestion, match state/federal funds by: widening/improving Routes I-5, I-205, 99, 12 and 120; expanding ACE commuter rail and seniors/disabled transit services; fixing potholes/resurfacing local roads; reducing high accident locations countywide; requiring citizens' oversight committee and annual audits to ensure all voter mandates are met; by authorizing continuation of the existing half-cent sales tax for no longer than 30 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 104486, "no_votes": 29579, "total_votes": 134065, "percent_yes": 77.93682169097079, "percent_no": 22.06317830902921, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.533777", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.482186", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Joaquin County Transportation Authority be authorized to relieve traffic congestion, match state/federal funds by: widening/improving Routes I-5, I-205, 99, 12 and 120; expanding ACE commuter rail and seniors/disabled transit services; fixing potholes/resurfacing local roads; reducing high accident locations countywide; requiring citizens' oversight committee and annual audits to ensure all voter mandates are met; by authorizing continuation of the existing half-cent sales tax for no longer than 30 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7848, "fingerprint": "2006|200600521|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600521|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "eb928b5faf702210", "measure_id": "200600521", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education in north Stockton schools by improving safety systems at existing schools, constructing elementary, middle and high schools, providing additional classroom and science laboratory space and expanded access to technology, improving athletic facilities, and purchasing or leasing of school facilities and sites, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Lodi Unified School District issue $114,000,000 in bonds, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9225, "no_votes": 5951, "total_votes": 15176, "percent_yes": 60.78676858197153, "percent_no": 39.21323141802847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.535472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.483884", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education in north Stockton schools by improving safety systems at existing schools, constructing elementary, middle and high schools, providing additional classroom and science laboratory space and expanded access to technology, improving athletic facilities, and purchasing or leasing of school facilities and sites, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Lodi Unified School District issue $114,000,000 in bonds, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7846, "fingerprint": "2006|200600392|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600392|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "789e8da16636a20e", "measure_id": "200600392", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To hire/train additional firefighters and police officers to reduce gang and drug crimes, expand gang and drug prevention programs; expand neighborhood patrols of schools and parks, improve emergency response times by replacing outdated emergency radio communications equipment; purchase firefighter protective clothing and breathing apparatuses shall the City of Manteca enact a 1/2 cent sales tax with citizens' oversight committee and independent annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9179, "no_votes": 3929, "total_votes": 13108, "percent_yes": 70.0259383582545, "percent_no": 29.974061641745493, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.534935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.483299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To hire/train additional firefighters and police officers to reduce gang and drug crimes, expand gang and drug prevention programs; expand neighborhood patrols of schools and parks, improve emergency response times by replacing outdated emergency radio communications equipment; purchase firefighter protective clothing and breathing apparatuses shall the City of Manteca enact a 1/2 cent sales tax with citizens' oversight committee and independent annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7847, "fingerprint": "2006|200600393|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600393|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "57f5b2ddd18f8b0f", "measure_id": "200600393", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Stockton adopt a Charter amendment to revise article XXV to expand coverage to all Classified employees; delete provision authorizing Commission to discharge or suspend City Clerk; add provision for tenure in class; delete the terms \"intemperance\" and \"immoral conduct\"; delete provision for reports on compensation of employees; delete provision for extra compensation to employees; delete provision for exam costs to be charged only to general fund; and renumber various sections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20849, "no_votes": 24688, "total_votes": 45537, "percent_yes": 45.7847464699036, "percent_no": 54.2152535300964, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.535203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.483578", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Stockton adopt a Charter amendment to revise article XXV to expand coverage to all Classified employees; delete provision authorizing Commission to discharge or suspend City Clerk; add provision for tenure in class; delete the terms \"intemperance\" and \"immoral conduct\"; delete provision for reports on compensation of employees; delete provision for extra compensation to employees; delete provision for exam costs to be charged only to general fund; and renumber various sections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7840, "fingerprint": "2006|200600162|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600162|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "daea6281139bc365", "measure_id": "200600162", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize Oakdale High and enlarge the Career Technical/Vocational classrooms, to build and modernize elementary schools, replace portables, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District issue $37.5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27, "no_votes": 18, "total_votes": 45, "percent_yes": 60.0, "percent_no": 40.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.533233", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.481619", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize Oakdale High and enlarge the Career Technical/Vocational classrooms, to build and modernize elementary schools, replace portables, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District issue $37.5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7852, "fingerprint": "2006|200600239|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600239|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "90fef2a0f8b01b12", "measure_id": "200600239", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall TAMMY FORREST be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the California Valley Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45, "no_votes": 89, "total_votes": 134, "percent_yes": 33.582089552238806, "percent_no": 66.41791044776119, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.536719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.485014", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall TAMMY FORREST be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the California Valley Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7853, "fingerprint": "2006|200600240|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600240|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "c4d92cede151036a", "measure_id": "200600240", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall PRINCE FRAZIER be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the California Valley Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89, "no_votes": 43, "total_votes": 132, "percent_yes": 67.42424242424242, "percent_no": 32.57575757575758, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.536991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.485286", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall PRINCE FRAZIER be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the California Valley Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7854, "fingerprint": "2006|200600241|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600241|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "3aa85d9575a958fc", "measure_id": "200600241", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall THOMAS ORTEGA, JR. be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the California Valley Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44, "no_votes": 89, "total_votes": 133, "percent_yes": 33.08270676691729, "percent_no": 66.91729323308272, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.537259", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.485571", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall THOMAS ORTEGA, JR. be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the California Valley Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7855, "fingerprint": "2006|200600242|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600242|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "4c8e7aac4167a147", "measure_id": "200600242", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall WILLIAM F. RAHNER be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the California Valley Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45, "no_votes": 88, "total_votes": 133, "percent_yes": 33.83458646616541, "percent_no": 66.1654135338346, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.537524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.485848", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall WILLIAM F. RAHNER be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the California Valley Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7870, "fingerprint": "2006|200600406|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600406|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "f8e0309858647c30", "measure_id": "200600406", "measure_letter": "CC-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The Pismo Beach Vital Public Service Protection Measure. To help preserve, enhance and improve the infrastructure, safety and character of Pismo Beach, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the City of Pismo Beach sales tax by one-half cent, subject to independent annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1819, "no_votes": 1884, "total_votes": 3703, "percent_yes": 49.12233324331623, "percent_no": 50.87766675668377, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.542214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.490014", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The Pismo Beach Vital Public Service Protection Measure. To help preserve, enhance and improve the infrastructure, safety and character of Pismo Beach, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the City of Pismo Beach sales tax by one-half cent, subject to independent annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7851, "fingerprint": "2006|200600165|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600165|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "b7c88bf1e520fd46", "measure_id": "200600165", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Cuesta college students for skilled jobs and university transfer by: repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems; building and modernizing classrooms, science and computer labs, dental hygiene and job training centers; updating classroom and lab technology; acquiring facilities/sites and constructing and equipping buildings, classrooms and labs, shall the San Luis Obispo County Community College District issue $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29385, "no_votes": 34242, "total_votes": 63627, "percent_yes": 46.18322410297515, "percent_no": 53.81677589702485, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.536436", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.484731", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Cuesta college students for skilled jobs and university transfer by: repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems; building and modernizing classrooms, science and computer labs, dental hygiene and job training centers; updating classroom and lab technology; acquiring facilities/sites and constructing and equipping buildings, classrooms and labs, shall the San Luis Obispo County Community College District issue $310,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7850, "fingerprint": "2006|200600164|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600164|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "f919ff3558275b72", "measure_id": "200600164", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve high school facilities by replacing deteriorating portable buildings and relieving overcrowded conditions by constructing permanent classrooms and career oriented centers; renovating and properly equipping older classrooms and physical education facilities; and repairing roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems, shall Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent for no other purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5599, "no_votes": 4638, "total_votes": 10237, "percent_yes": 54.69375793689557, "percent_no": 45.30624206310443, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.536054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.484448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve high school facilities by replacing deteriorating portable buildings and relieving overcrowded conditions by constructing permanent classrooms and career oriented centers; renovating and properly equipping older classrooms and physical education facilities; and repairing roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems, shall Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent for no other purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7857, "fingerprint": "2006|200600244|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600244|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "5acbd7830a708dda", "measure_id": "200600244", "measure_letter": "J-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved amending the San Luis Obispo County General Plan, Title 22 of the County Code, and the Official Maps to allow for development of the Dalidio Ranch Property, which is located adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo, between Highway 101 and Madonna Rd., south of the Promenade Shopping Center, and north of the auto dealerships located along Los Osos Valley Road?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60684, "no_votes": 33313, "total_votes": 93997, "percent_yes": 64.55950721831549, "percent_no": 35.44049278168451, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.538136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.486399", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved amending the San Luis Obispo County General Plan, Title 22 of the County Code, and the Official Maps to allow for development of the Dalidio Ranch Property, which is located adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo, between Highway 101 and Madonna Rd., south of the Promenade Shopping Center, and north of the auto dealerships located along Los Osos Valley Road?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7858, "fingerprint": "2006|200600394|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600394|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "71a3fbe2bc3c3d02", "measure_id": "200600394", "measure_letter": "K-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the proposed sales tax measure (O-06) is approved, should a portion of the proceeds be used to fund transportation improvements, including, but not limited to, upgrade of the Brisco Road/Halcyon Road - Highway 101 Interchange?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4810, "no_votes": 2017, "total_votes": 6827, "percent_yes": 70.45554416288266, "percent_no": 29.54445583711734, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.538405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.486673", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the proposed sales tax measure (O-06) is approved, should a portion of the proceeds be used to fund transportation improvements, including, but not limited to, upgrade of the Brisco Road/Halcyon Road - Highway 101 Interchange?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7859, "fingerprint": "2006|200600395|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600395|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "98ec00ce0021ab29", "measure_id": "200600395", "measure_letter": "L-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the proposed sales tax measure (Measure O-06) is approved, should a portion of the proceeds be used to fund maintenance and upgrade of the City's infrastructure, including, but not limited to, street maintenance and improvements, upgrade of the drainage system, and projects to prevent pollution, erosion and sedimentation in the creek system from storm water runoff?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4590, "no_votes": 2103, "total_votes": 6693, "percent_yes": 68.57911250560286, "percent_no": 31.420887494397135, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.538974", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.486946", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the proposed sales tax measure (Measure O-06) is approved, should a portion of the proceeds be used to fund maintenance and upgrade of the City's infrastructure, including, but not limited to, street maintenance and improvements, upgrade of the drainage system, and projects to prevent pollution, erosion and sedimentation in the creek system from storm water runoff?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7860, "fingerprint": "2006|200600396|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600396|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "ab9262dd4c8f8c45", "measure_id": "200600396", "measure_letter": "M-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the proposed sales tax measure (Measure O-06) is approved, should a portion of the proceeds be used to fund public safety expenses, including, but not limited to, expansion of the Police Station, purchase of Fire apparatus, and additional Fire Department staffing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3983, "no_votes": 2668, "total_votes": 6651, "percent_yes": 59.885731468952045, "percent_no": 40.114268531047955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.539330", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.487221", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the proposed sales tax measure (Measure O-06) is approved, should a portion of the proceeds be used to fund public safety expenses, including, but not limited to, expansion of the Police Station, purchase of Fire apparatus, and additional Fire Department staffing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7861, "fingerprint": "2006|200600397|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600397|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "6f7877a642a271b3", "measure_id": "200600397", "measure_letter": "N-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If the proposed sales tax measure (Measure O-06) is approved, should a portion of the proceeds be used to fund improvements to City facilities to meet Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, including, but not limited to, upgrade of the City Hall complex?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2727, "no_votes": 3900, "total_votes": 6627, "percent_yes": 41.14984155726573, "percent_no": 58.85015844273427, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.539680", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.487502", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If the proposed sales tax measure (Measure O-06) is approved, should a portion of the proceeds be used to fund improvements to City facilities to meet Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, including, but not limited to, upgrade of the City Hall complex?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7862, "fingerprint": "2006|200600398|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600398|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "bf29f19b0c41f920", "measure_id": "200600398", "measure_letter": "O-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted enacting a one half cent sales tax to fund community needs, with a requirement to publish and distribute an annual report to each household on the revenues and expenditures from the proceeds, and requiring a review and public hearing by the City Council every five years to determine whether it is necessary for the sales tax to remain in effect?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3491, "no_votes": 3478, "total_votes": 6969, "percent_yes": 50.09327019658487, "percent_no": 49.90672980341513, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.539995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.487778", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted enacting a one half cent sales tax to fund community needs, with a requirement to publish and distribute an annual report to each household on the revenues and expenditures from the proceeds, and requiring a review and public hearing by the City Council every five years to determine whether it is necessary for the sales tax to remain in effect?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7856, "fingerprint": "2006|200600243|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600243|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "1da412d381557d8a", "measure_id": "200600243", "measure_letter": "P-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance requiring a majority vote of the electorate of the Cambria Community Services District to provide potable water service outside the 2006 District boundaries be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2512, "no_votes": 686, "total_votes": 3198, "percent_yes": 78.54909318323952, "percent_no": 21.45090681676048, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.537833", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.486124", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance requiring a majority vote of the electorate of the Cambria Community Services District to provide potable water service outside the 2006 District boundaries be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7867, "fingerprint": "2006|200600403|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600403|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "20afcce8b1ca8965", "measure_id": "200600403", "measure_letter": "Q-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The Morro Bay Vital Public Services Restoration and Protection Measure. To preserve Morro Bay's safety and character by funding essential services including upgrading firefighter/paramedic equipment, fire stations, police, street and pothole repairs, improving storm drains to protect the bay from pollution, and other general city services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City sales tax by one-half cent, subject to independent annual financial audits, and establishing an independent citizens' advisory committee to review annual expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3034, "no_votes": 1634, "total_votes": 4668, "percent_yes": 64.99571550985432, "percent_no": 35.00428449014568, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.541345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.489172", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The Morro Bay Vital Public Services Restoration and Protection Measure. To preserve Morro Bay's safety and character by funding essential services including upgrading firefighter/paramedic equipment, fire stations, police, street and pothole repairs, improving storm drains to protect the bay from pollution, and other general city services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City sales tax by one-half cent, subject to independent annual financial audits, and establishing an independent citizens' advisory committee to review annual expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7868, "fingerprint": "2006|200600404|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600404|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "2989bb5a94efb4e3", "measure_id": "200600404", "measure_letter": "R-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Municipal Code be amended to require that city council vacancies be filled by election and to set forth a process by which city council members may vacate their seats prior to the expiration of their full term for the purpose of running for alternate public office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2589, "no_votes": 1732, "total_votes": 4321, "percent_yes": 59.91668595232586, "percent_no": 40.08331404767414, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.541647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.489448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Municipal Code be amended to require that city council vacancies be filled by election and to set forth a process by which city council members may vacate their seats prior to the expiration of their full term for the purpose of running for alternate public office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7869, "fingerprint": "2006|200600405|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600405|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "5580e01ba802a604", "measure_id": "200600405", "measure_letter": "S-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Municipal Code be amended to change the time and method of electing city officials to allow for a primary election with the most successful of those candidates advancing to a November runoff election or being elected by an outright majority vote in the primary election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2531, "no_votes": 1773, "total_votes": 4304, "percent_yes": 58.80576208178439, "percent_no": 41.19423791821561, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.541946", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.489728", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Municipal Code be amended to change the time and method of electing city officials to allow for a primary election with the most successful of those candidates advancing to a November runoff election or being elected by an outright majority vote in the primary election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7873, "fingerprint": "2006|200600524|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600524|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "f919ff3558275b72", "measure_id": "200600524", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve high school facilities by replacing deteriorating portable buildings and relieving overcrowded conditions by constructing permanent classrooms and career oriented centers; renovating and properly equipping older classrooms and physical education facilities; and repairing roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems, shall Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below the statutory limit? The board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent for no other purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8715, "no_votes": 5718, "total_votes": 14433, "percent_yes": 60.38245686967366, "percent_no": 39.61754313032634, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.543048", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.490851", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve high school facilities by replacing deteriorating portable buildings and relieving overcrowded conditions by constructing permanent classrooms and career oriented centers; renovating and properly equipping older classrooms and physical education facilities; and repairing roofs, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems, shall Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below the statutory limit? The board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent for no other purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7863, "fingerprint": "2006|200600399|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600399|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "e185d41a946b291f", "measure_id": "200600399", "measure_letter": "U-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a Mayor and four Council Members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2546, "no_votes": 794, "total_votes": 3340, "percent_yes": 76.22754491017965, "percent_no": 23.772455089820355, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.540270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.488051", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a Mayor and four Council Members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7864, "fingerprint": "2006|200600400|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600400|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "51bc78433c3b3a90", "measure_id": "200600400", "measure_letter": "V-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2313, "no_votes": 1055, "total_votes": 3368, "percent_yes": 68.67577197149643, "percent_no": 31.32422802850357, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.540542", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.488322", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7865, "fingerprint": "2006|200600401|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600401|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "200600401", "measure_letter": "W-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 980, "no_votes": 2342, "total_votes": 3322, "percent_yes": 29.50030102347983, "percent_no": 70.49969897652016, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.540808", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.488607", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7866, "fingerprint": "2006|200600402|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600402|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "039faecd905143be", "measure_id": "200600402", "measure_letter": "X-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "VITAL CITY SERVICES PROTECTION: Shall the City of Grover Beach sales tax be increased by one-half percent (0.5%) and a citizens' oversight committee be created to help preserve the safety and character of Grover Beach by funding essential services, including the Police and Fire Departments, repair potholes and fix city streets and sidewalks, increase recreation opportunities for seniors and youth, improve city parks and beach access, and other general city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1973, "no_votes": 1568, "total_votes": 3541, "percent_yes": 55.71872352442813, "percent_no": 44.28127647557187, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.541075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.488876", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VITAL CITY SERVICES PROTECTION: Shall the City of Grover Beach sales tax be increased by one-half percent (0.5%) and a citizens' oversight committee be created to help preserve the safety and character of Grover Beach by funding essential services, including the Police and Fire Departments, repair potholes and fix city streets and sidewalks, increase recreation opportunities for seniors and youth, improve city parks and beach access, and other general city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7871, "fingerprint": "2006|200600407|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600407|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "df4b3f232cacc3f8", "measure_id": "200600407", "measure_letter": "Y-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "San Luis Obispo Essential Services Measure: To protect and maintain essential services - such as neighborhood street paving and pothole repair; traffic congestion relief; public safety, including restoring eliminated traffic patrol, Fire Marshal and fire/paramedic training positions; flood protection; senior citizen services/facilities; neighborhood code enforcement; open space preservation and other vital general purpose services - shall the sales tax be increased by one-half cent for eight years only, with citizen oversight and independent annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9598, "no_votes": 5221, "total_votes": 14819, "percent_yes": 64.7682029826574, "percent_no": 35.2317970173426, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.542481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.490295", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Luis Obispo Essential Services Measure: To protect and maintain essential services - such as neighborhood street paving and pothole repair; traffic congestion relief; public safety, including restoring eliminated traffic patrol, Fire Marshal and fire/paramedic training positions; flood protection; senior citizen services/facilities; neighborhood code enforcement; open space preservation and other vital general purpose services - shall the sales tax be increased by one-half cent for eight years only, with citizen oversight and independent annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7872, "fingerprint": "2006|200600523|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600523|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "e45afeba1135060e", "measure_id": "200600523", "measure_letter": "Z-06", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a joint use, multi-purpose gymnasium and community center for physical and health education, student athletics, performing arts, shall the Cayucos Elementary School District be authorized to construct this school facility and provide all necessary indoor needs of the facility and issue $2,900,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with NO funds for any administrative or other staff salaries and a continuance of the appointed Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1003, "no_votes": 548, "total_votes": 1551, "percent_yes": 64.66795615731786, "percent_no": 35.33204384268214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.542750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.490576", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a joint use, multi-purpose gymnasium and community center for physical and health education, student athletics, performing arts, shall the Cayucos Elementary School District be authorized to construct this school facility and provide all necessary indoor needs of the facility and issue $2,900,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with NO funds for any administrative or other staff salaries and a continuance of the appointed Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7877, "fingerprint": "2006|200600245|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600245|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4969db46f8187492", "measure_id": "200600245", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall San Mateo County enact a one-eighth cent sales tax, with annual audits and reports to the community, to support parks and recreation services provided by cities, the county and special districts, including, but not limited to: maintaining and improving park bathrooms, picnic areas and athletic facilities; repairing and upgrading playgrounds and play structures; improving access to parks and playgrounds for the disabled; preserving natural open spaces; and maintaining hiking, walking and biking trails?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107418, "no_votes": 86469, "total_votes": 193887, "percent_yes": 55.40237354747869, "percent_no": 44.59762645252131, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.544197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.492162", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall San Mateo County enact a one-eighth cent sales tax, with annual audits and reports to the community, to support parks and recreation services provided by cities, the county and special districts, including, but not limited to: maintaining and improving park bathrooms, picnic areas and athletic facilities; repairing and upgrading playgrounds and play structures; improving access to parks and playgrounds for the disabled; preserving natural open spaces; and maintaining hiking, walking and biking trails?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7878, "fingerprint": "2006|200600408|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600408|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2b0a79335c626dae", "measure_id": "200600408", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City Council grant permits and approvals that would change the existing use of the Guadalupe Valley Quarry to allow a proposed residential development consisting of 102 Single Family Units, 16 Live-Work Units, 32 Artists Lofts, and 23 \"Granny\" Units? This measure shall be binding upon the property owner and the City.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 400, "no_votes": 1095, "total_votes": 1495, "percent_yes": 26.75585284280936, "percent_no": 73.24414715719064, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.544495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.492360", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City Council grant permits and approvals that would change the existing use of the Guadalupe Valley Quarry to allow a proposed residential development consisting of 102 Single Family Units, 16 Live-Work Units, 32 Artists Lofts, and 23 \"Granny\" Units? This measure shall be binding upon the property owner and the City.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7881, "fingerprint": "2006|200600411|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600411|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5be0e4c4ab1fa82e", "measure_id": "200600411", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To reduce violent crime and apprehend violent criminals, shall a City Council-sponsored special tax be approved for a period of ten years, with 50% of tax funds to support youth and community prevention and 50% to support neighborhood law enforcement programs and is subject to annual audit and performance oversight by a citizens' committee, with exemptions for senior citizens and disabled persons?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2160, "no_votes": 1030, "total_votes": 3190, "percent_yes": 67.7115987460815, "percent_no": 32.288401253918494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.545298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.492936", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce violent crime and apprehend violent criminals, shall a City Council-sponsored special tax be approved for a period of ten years, with 50% of tax funds to support youth and community prevention and 50% to support neighborhood law enforcement programs and is subject to annual audit and performance oversight by a citizens' committee, with exemptions for senior citizens and disabled persons?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7882, "fingerprint": "2006|200600412|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600412|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "1266485d1ea824ee", "measure_id": "200600412", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure be adopted imposing a 10-year parcel tax of $75 on single-family parcels, $40 for occupied rental units and an equivalent rate for commercial and industrial properties, to be restricted for law enforcement purposes only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 664, "no_votes": 2474, "total_votes": 3138, "percent_yes": 21.15997450605481, "percent_no": 78.84002549394519, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.545568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.493128", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure be adopted imposing a 10-year parcel tax of $75 on single-family parcels, $40 for occupied rental units and an equivalent rate for commercial and industrial properties, to be restricted for law enforcement purposes only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7883, "fingerprint": "2006|200600413|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600413|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "98b0f8893a51e5b3", "measure_id": "200600413", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure be adopted amending East Palo Alto's \u2018good cause for eviction\u2019 provisions (sec. 14.04.290 of the municipal code) to permit any landlord to evict a tenant and recover possession of a rental unit on any basis permitted by the rental agreement and applicable state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 972, "no_votes": 2240, "total_votes": 3212, "percent_yes": 30.26151930261519, "percent_no": 69.7384806973848, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.545888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.493321", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative measure be adopted amending East Palo Alto's \u2018good cause for eviction\u2019 provisions (sec. 14.04.290 of the municipal code) to permit any landlord to evict a tenant and recover possession of a rental unit on any basis permitted by the rental agreement and applicable state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7887, "fingerprint": "2006|200600417|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600417|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d7bb550682fae9a3", "measure_id": "200600417", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do the People of the Town of Portola Valley adopt an ordinance that lowers the existing five and one-half percent (5.5%) Utility Users Tax levied on telephone, gas, water and electricity, set forth in Chapter 3.32 of the Town of Portola Valley Municipal Code, to four and one-half percent (4.5%) for a period of three (3) years and five (5) months beginning February 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1944, "no_votes": 310, "total_votes": 2254, "percent_yes": 86.24667258207631, "percent_no": 13.753327417923686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.547080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.494076", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do the People of the Town of Portola Valley adopt an ordinance that lowers the existing five and one-half percent (5.5%) Utility Users Tax levied on telephone, gas, water and electricity, set forth in Chapter 3.32 of the Town of Portola Valley Municipal Code, to four and one-half percent (4.5%) for a period of three (3) years and five (5) months beginning February 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7880, "fingerprint": "2006|200600410|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600410|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ff94fa33d48dc02b", "measure_id": "200600410", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Daly City Utility Users Tax, in place since 1989 and which includes exemptions for low income seniors, blind and disabled persons, be adopted by ordinance so that it can continue to be collected in order to raise monies for city services including police, fire, parks, libraries, and recreation programs that might otherwise be reduced if this tax is not collected?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12194, "no_votes": 4877, "total_votes": 17071, "percent_yes": 71.43108195184816, "percent_no": 28.568918048151843, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.545031", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.492745", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Daly City Utility Users Tax, in place since 1989 and which includes exemptions for low income seniors, blind and disabled persons, be adopted by ordinance so that it can continue to be collected in order to raise monies for city services including police, fire, parks, libraries, and recreation programs that might otherwise be reduced if this tax is not collected?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7879, "fingerprint": "2006|200600409|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600409|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6f5230438827a66f", "measure_id": "200600409", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To safeguard Burlingame residents, homes and businesses, shall the City of Burlingame be authorized to issue $37,000,000 in bonds to improve aging and undercapacity flood control infrastructure; and for seismic stability, disabled access, safety, security, fire protection, ventilation and disaster preparedness improvements in existing City buildings, shall the City be authorized to issue $7,000,000 in bonds; with all expenditures monitored by a citizens' oversight committee with annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5765, "no_votes": 3247, "total_votes": 9012, "percent_yes": 63.97026187305814, "percent_no": 36.02973812694186, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.544765", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.492558", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To safeguard Burlingame residents, homes and businesses, shall the City of Burlingame be authorized to issue $37,000,000 in bonds to improve aging and undercapacity flood control infrastructure; and for seismic stability, disabled access, safety, security, fire protection, ventilation and disaster preparedness improvements in existing City buildings, shall the City be authorized to issue $7,000,000 in bonds; with all expenditures monitored by a citizens' oversight committee with annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7889, "fingerprint": "2006|200600526|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600526|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "506b38fc548be737", "measure_id": "200600526", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local education for our children by replacing old, temporary buildings with new schools and repairing or replacing inadequate facilities, such as fire safety systems, bathrooms, plumbing, heating and electrical systems; remove asbestos, dry rot, mold, other hazardous materials; repair leaky roofs; improve earthquake safety; and to qualify for state matching funds, shall La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds within legal rates with independent oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 918, "no_votes": 391, "total_votes": 1309, "percent_yes": 70.12987012987013, "percent_no": 29.870129870129873, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.547655", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.494436", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local education for our children by replacing old, temporary buildings with new schools and repairing or replacing inadequate facilities, such as fire safety systems, bathrooms, plumbing, heating and electrical systems; remove asbestos, dry rot, mold, other hazardous materials; repair leaky roofs; improve earthquake safety; and to qualify for state matching funds, shall La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds within legal rates with independent oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7884, "fingerprint": "2006|200600414|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600414|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6f85622daf35dd7c", "measure_id": "200600414", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Menlo Park have the option of constructing sports fields, with necessary infrastructure, on not more than 17 acres of the 160 total acres at Bayfront Park, subject to obtaining all environmental clearances and regulatory agency approvals necessary to build the sports fields, using developer fees, user fees, donations, and other voter-approved parks and recreation funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4273, "no_votes": 6677, "total_votes": 10950, "percent_yes": 39.02283105022831, "percent_no": 60.97716894977169, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.546260", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.493525", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Menlo Park have the option of constructing sports fields, with necessary infrastructure, on not more than 17 acres of the 160 total acres at Bayfront Park, subject to obtaining all environmental clearances and regulatory agency approvals necessary to build the sports fields, using developer fees, user fees, donations, and other voter-approved parks and recreation funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7885, "fingerprint": "2006|200600415|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600415|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "629e5e316cf58c84", "measure_id": "200600415", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund general city services including police, emergency preparedness, street and storm drain maintenance and libraries, shall the City of Menlo Park impose a 3.5% utility users tax on electricity, natural gas and water, and a 2.5% tax on communications, to address a budget imbalance and to be reviewed by the City Council every two years and terminated if findings are not made that the tax is necessary for the City's financial health?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5420, "no_votes": 5353, "total_votes": 10773, "percent_yes": 50.31096259166434, "percent_no": 49.68903740833566, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.546543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.493709", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund general city services including police, emergency preparedness, street and storm drain maintenance and libraries, shall the City of Menlo Park impose a 3.5% utility users tax on electricity, natural gas and water, and a 2.5% tax on communications, to address a budget imbalance and to be reviewed by the City Council every two years and terminated if findings are not made that the tax is necessary for the City's financial health?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7886, "fingerprint": "2006|200600416|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600416|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2ba32f5d5fc853b2", "measure_id": "200600416", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative authorizing the City of Pacifica City Council to approve a mixed-use residential and commercial development on the Rockaway Quarry, subject to specified conditions, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7180, "no_votes": 7689, "total_votes": 14869, "percent_yes": 48.28838523101755, "percent_no": 51.71161476898245, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.546812", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.493893", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative authorizing the City of Pacifica City Council to approve a mixed-use residential and commercial development on the Rockaway Quarry, subject to specified conditions, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7890, "fingerprint": "2006|200600527|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600527|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b4fefcbbbf4fe321", "measure_id": "200600527", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue renovation and rehabilitation of 45- to 83-year old buildings and facilities on seven campuses for safe, healthy teaching and learning environments; further upgrade fire safety, accessibility, electrical, security, and sewer systems; repair, remodel, expand, build new and replace old, inadequate classroom buildings and other facilities per the District's Bond Projects List, with citizens' oversight of all expenditures, shall San Mateo Union High School District issue $298 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42296, "no_votes": 21344, "total_votes": 63640, "percent_yes": 66.46134506599623, "percent_no": 33.53865493400377, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.547951", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.494627", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue renovation and rehabilitation of 45- to 83-year old buildings and facilities on seven campuses for safe, healthy teaching and learning environments; further upgrade fire safety, accessibility, electrical, security, and sewer systems; repair, remodel, expand, build new and replace old, inadequate classroom buildings and other facilities per the District's Bond Projects List, with citizens' oversight of all expenditures, shall San Mateo Union High School District issue $298 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7888, "fingerprint": "2006|200600525|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600525|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "589ec0af3db46ac9", "measure_id": "200600525", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct, acquire, renovate and upgrade classrooms and school facilities including science and computer labs, libraries, and other educational facilities throughout the District; increase access to computers and modern technology; and improve student safety and handicap accessibility; shall the Jefferson Union High School District be authorized to issue $136,900,000 of bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits and an independent citizens' oversight committee, with all funds spent locally and no bond money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22025, "no_votes": 9333, "total_votes": 31358, "percent_yes": 70.23726002933861, "percent_no": 29.762739970661386, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.547356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.494254", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, acquire, renovate and upgrade classrooms and school facilities including science and computer labs, libraries, and other educational facilities throughout the District; increase access to computers and modern technology; and improve student safety and handicap accessibility; shall the Jefferson Union High School District be authorized to issue $136,900,000 of bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits and an independent citizens' oversight committee, with all funds spent locally and no bond money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7874, "fingerprint": "2006|200600016|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600016|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f77af11606afea0f", "measure_id": "200600016", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Colma Municipal Code section 4.09.290, as enacted by Ordinance 640, be approved to expand gambling in the Town of Colma beyond that operated or authorized on January 1, 1996 by allowing unlimited wagers instead of a limit of $200 per bet in a poker game and $200 per betting slot in an Asian game; and further allowing the City Council to later set lower wagering limits by resolution without further voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 247, "no_votes": 28, "total_votes": 275, "percent_yes": 89.81818181818181, "percent_no": 10.181818181818187, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.543345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.491127", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Colma Municipal Code section 4.09.290, as enacted by Ordinance 640, be approved to expand gambling in the Town of Colma beyond that operated or authorized on January 1, 1996 by allowing unlimited wagers instead of a limit of $200 per bet in a poker game and $200 per betting slot in an Asian game; and further allowing the City Council to later set lower wagering limits by resolution without further voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7875, "fingerprint": "2006|200600166|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600166|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e2fc7753f5215618", "measure_id": "200600166", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To further student academic achievement by retaining and recruiting highly qualified teachers, supporting their ability to focus on individual student needs through lower class sizes and providing academic resources at all grade levels, shall the Cabrillo Unified School District levy an annual tax for 5 years of $175 on improved parcels, $30 on unimproved parcels, with senior citizen exemptions and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4294, "no_votes": 2564, "total_votes": 6858, "percent_yes": 62.6130067074949, "percent_no": 37.3869932925051, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.543619", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.491406", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To further student academic achievement by retaining and recruiting highly qualified teachers, supporting their ability to focus on individual student needs through lower class sizes and providing academic resources at all grade levels, shall the Cabrillo Unified School District levy an annual tax for 5 years of $175 on improved parcels, $30 on unimproved parcels, with senior citizen exemptions and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7876, "fingerprint": "2006|200600167|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600167|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "cdf701602a3a926b", "measure_id": "200600167", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace portable classrooms, provide adequate additional classroom space to avoid overcrowding and to enhance student learning and safety by building, modernizing, renovating and acquiring school buildings and facilities at each of the District's school sites as indicated in the Bond Project List; shall the Menlo Park City School District issue $91.1 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a volunteer Citizens' Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and use no bond money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4936, "no_votes": 2057, "total_votes": 6993, "percent_yes": 70.58487058487059, "percent_no": 29.415129415129414, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.543887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.491797", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace portable classrooms, provide adequate additional classroom space to avoid overcrowding and to enhance student learning and safety by building, modernizing, renovating and acquiring school buildings and facilities at each of the District's school sites as indicated in the Bond Project List; shall the Menlo Park City School District issue $91.1 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a volunteer Citizens' Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and use no bond money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7895, "fingerprint": "2006|200600246|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600246|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "53b6f915e8736ce5", "measure_id": "200600246", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To fund a traffic congestion relief and safety improvement expenditure plan, with citizen oversight and all funds spent on local projects including widening US 101 south of Milpas; expanding bus service including fare reduction for seniors and disabled persons; maintaining and repairing roads; establishing pilot commuter rail service; implementing a safe routes to school program; shall Santa Barbara County voters approve an ordinance extending for 30 years and increasing by one-quarter cent the existing one-half cent sales tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63407, "no_votes": 53007, "total_votes": 116414, "percent_yes": 54.46681670589448, "percent_no": 45.53318329410552, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.549592", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.495727", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund a traffic congestion relief and safety improvement expenditure plan, with citizen oversight and all funds spent on local projects including widening US 101 south of Milpas; expanding bus service including fare reduction for seniors and disabled persons; maintaining and repairing roads; establishing pilot commuter rail service; implementing a safe routes to school program; shall Santa Barbara County voters approve an ordinance extending for 30 years and increasing by one-quarter cent the existing one-half cent sales tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7892, "fingerprint": "2006|200600083|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600083|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "7c9b3facc363b613", "measure_id": "200600083", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the charter filed with the City Clerk of the City of Solvang on January 9, 2006 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 806, "no_votes": 841, "total_votes": 1647, "percent_yes": 48.93746205221616, "percent_no": 51.06253794778384, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.548763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.495179", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the charter filed with the City Clerk of the City of Solvang on January 9, 2006 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11711, "fingerprint": "2006|200600046|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600046|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d36c598544661cfa", "measure_id": "200600046", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Mission be formed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14576, "no_votes": 70405, "total_votes": 84981, "percent_yes": 17.15206928607571, "percent_no": 82.84793071392428, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.539381", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.548490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.494996", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Mission be formed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7891, "fingerprint": "2006|200600045|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600045|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d36c598544661cfa", "measure_id": "200600045", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Mission be formed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7374, "no_votes": 32158, "total_votes": 39532, "percent_yes": 18.653242942426377, "percent_no": 81.34675705757363, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.548221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.494812", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Mission be formed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7893, "fingerprint": "2006|200600168|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600168|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "b481c7d79d249edd", "measure_id": "200600168", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Improve the quality of programs at Allan Hancock College by: Improving academic facilities to help students transfer to four-year colleges; Improving job training facilities for police, firefighter, healthcare and other careers; Upgrading aging buildings, classrooms and technology; And by upgrading, acquiring constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Allan Hancock Joint Community College District issue $180,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22990, "no_votes": 16972, "total_votes": 39962, "percent_yes": 57.52965317051199, "percent_no": 42.47034682948801, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.549027", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.495360", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Improve the quality of programs at Allan Hancock College by: Improving academic facilities to help students transfer to four-year colleges; Improving job training facilities for police, firefighter, healthcare and other careers; Upgrading aging buildings, classrooms and technology; And by upgrading, acquiring constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Allan Hancock Joint Community College District issue $180,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7894, "fingerprint": "2006|200600169|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600169|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "63cce4c725a5269b", "measure_id": "200600169", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Solvang School District be authorized to upgrade, renovate, and modernize classrooms and facilities including making health and safety improvements, renovating plumbing and restrooms, constructing a new library, upgrading inadequate electrical systems, building new classrooms, improving access to computers and technology, and qualifying the District for $2,500,000 in State grants by issuing $11,650,000 in bonds within legal limits, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1148, "no_votes": 715, "total_votes": 1863, "percent_yes": 61.621041331186255, "percent_no": 38.378958668813745, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.549293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.495541", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Solvang School District be authorized to upgrade, renovate, and modernize classrooms and facilities including making health and safety improvements, renovating plumbing and restrooms, constructing a new library, upgrading inadequate electrical systems, building new classrooms, improving access to computers and technology, and qualifying the District for $2,500,000 in State grants by issuing $11,650,000 in bonds within legal limits, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7900, "fingerprint": "2006|200600528|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600528|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "fb1876857431e88f", "measure_id": "200600528", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Cold Spring School District be authorized to repair, renovate, upgrade, and modernize Cold Spring School; improve student safety and handicap accessibility; expand the library, construct new classrooms, restrooms and educational facilities; and improve access to computers and technology by issuing $14,500,000 in bonds within legal interest rates with spending annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds are spent locally within the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 661, "no_votes": 638, "total_votes": 1299, "percent_yes": 50.88529638183218, "percent_no": 49.11470361816782, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.550955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.496636", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Cold Spring School District be authorized to repair, renovate, upgrade, and modernize Cold Spring School; improve student safety and handicap accessibility; expand the library, construct new classrooms, restrooms and educational facilities; and improve access to computers and technology by issuing $14,500,000 in bonds within legal interest rates with spending annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrator salaries, and all funds are spent locally within the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7898, "fingerprint": "2006|200600419|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600419|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "faaaf4466b8a9ee2", "measure_id": "200600419", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the general transient occupancy tax and imposing an additional special transient occupancy tax be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 948, "no_votes": 1027, "total_votes": 1975, "percent_yes": 48.0, "percent_no": 52.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.550424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.496271", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the general transient occupancy tax and imposing an additional special transient occupancy tax be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7899, "fingerprint": "2006|200600420|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600420|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "290e792184e4d19c", "measure_id": "200600420", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed charter for the City of Solvang received and filed by the City Clerk on June 26, 2006 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1029, "no_votes": 863, "total_votes": 1892, "percent_yes": 54.38689217758985, "percent_no": 45.61310782241015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.550691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.496449", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed charter for the City of Solvang received and filed by the City Clerk on June 26, 2006 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7901, "fingerprint": "2006|200600529|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600529|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "44909032d2626cf8", "measure_id": "200600529", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To sustain and improve the quality of education, shall the Los Olivos School District construct or renovate classrooms, educational facilities and restrooms; make health and safety improvements throughout the District including upgrades to fire alarm systems and handicap accessibility; renovate the school's playfields by issuing $4,650,000 in bonds within legal interest rates with annual audits, spending reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, with no money for staff salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 469, "no_votes": 294, "total_votes": 763, "percent_yes": 61.46788990825688, "percent_no": 38.53211009174312, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.551251", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.496876", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To sustain and improve the quality of education, shall the Los Olivos School District construct or renovate classrooms, educational facilities and restrooms; make health and safety improvements throughout the District including upgrades to fire alarm systems and handicap accessibility; renovate the school's playfields by issuing $4,650,000 in bonds within legal interest rates with annual audits, spending reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, with no money for staff salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7896, "fingerprint": "2006|200600247|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600247|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "24c171b1dccd7428", "measure_id": "200600247", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a new special tax be authorized for imposition, within a newly created Zone of Benefit within County Service Area No. 45, in the amount of $22 per parcel per year for the purpose of funding enhanced library services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1430, "no_votes": 1291, "total_votes": 2721, "percent_yes": 52.55420801176038, "percent_no": 47.44579198823962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.549890", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.495910", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a new special tax be authorized for imposition, within a newly created Zone of Benefit within County Service Area No. 45, in the amount of $22 per parcel per year for the purpose of funding enhanced library services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7897, "fingerprint": "2006|200600418|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600418|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "89aabb4e963a949e", "measure_id": "200600418", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Barbara adopt an ordinance mandating that the Santa Barbara Police give State and Federal marijuana laws the lowest law enforcement priority possible?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18151, "no_votes": 9389, "total_votes": 27540, "percent_yes": 65.90777051561365, "percent_no": 34.09222948438635, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.550159", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.496089", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Barbara adopt an ordinance mandating that the Santa Barbara Police give State and Federal marijuana laws the lowest law enforcement priority possible?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11713, "fingerprint": "2006|200600248|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600248|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0c490f4834809c93", "measure_id": "200600248", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County General Plan be amended to reenact and modify certain existing provisions and add provisions for hillsides, open space, ranchlands, and rural areas in unincorporated areas of the County, including limiting minimum parcel size on ranchlands and hilltops to 160 acres, with exceptions, limiting building size, and prohibiting the Board of Supervisors from making changes to the General Plan inconsistent with these amendments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 192725, "no_votes": 198523, "total_votes": 391248, "percent_yes": 49.25903774587985, "percent_no": 50.74096225412015, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.547001", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.554897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.499160", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County General Plan be amended to reenact and modify certain existing provisions and add provisions for hillsides, open space, ranchlands, and rural areas in unincorporated areas of the County, including limiting minimum parcel size on ranchlands and hilltops to 160 acres, with exceptions, limiting building size, and prohibiting the Board of Supervisors from making changes to the General Plan inconsistent with these amendments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11712, "fingerprint": "2006|200600196|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600196|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "492b612251a23e46", "measure_id": "200600196", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Luther Burbank School District be authorized to acquire, improve and construct school facilities, improve health and safety including handicapped accessibility, construct a multipurpose room/cafeteria for school and community use, replace outdated portable classrooms with permanent classrooms to relieve overcrowding, qualify the District for joint use funding and state grants, by issuing $9,500,000, at interest rates below legal limits with a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 203, "no_votes": 59, "total_votes": 262, "percent_yes": 77.48091603053436, "percent_no": 22.51908396946564, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-09-22", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.546718", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.554460", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.498974", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Luther Burbank School District be authorized to acquire, improve and construct school facilities, improve health and safety including handicapped accessibility, construct a multipurpose room/cafeteria for school and community use, replace outdated portable classrooms with permanent classrooms to relieve overcrowding, qualify the District for joint use funding and state grants, by issuing $9,500,000, at interest rates below legal limits with a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7902, "fingerprint": "2006|200600047|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600047|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c2698f9e17beacd2", "measure_id": "200600047", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a one-half cent sales tax be enacted, for 30 years, for general county purposes, such as: The County hospital and clinics; Trauma and emergency services; Affordable homes for families and seniors; Health insurance for uninsured children; Prevention programs for at-risk youth, families and seniors; Transportation improvements approved in city and countywide transportation plans; Services for abused and neglected children; with a Citizens Oversight Committee ensuring fiscal accountability by reviewing the Annual Audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115239, "no_votes": 153592, "total_votes": 268831, "percent_yes": 42.8667080805413, "percent_no": 57.1332919194587, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.551658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.497129", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a one-half cent sales tax be enacted, for 30 years, for general county purposes, such as: The County hospital and clinics; Trauma and emergency services; Affordable homes for families and seniors; Health insurance for uninsured children; Prevention programs for at-risk youth, families and seniors; Transportation improvements approved in city and countywide transportation plans; Services for abused and neglected children; with a Citizens Oversight Committee ensuring fiscal accountability by reviewing the Annual Audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11716, "fingerprint": "2006|200600425|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600425|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5be9665ad45df946", "measure_id": "200600425", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a section be added to the City Charter which would require binding arbitration before a three person arbitration panel of all unresolved disputes between the City and certain personnel of the Police and Fire Departments on all matters relating to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of City employment, including the interpretation and application of any existing labor agreements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9853, "no_votes": 12612, "total_votes": 22465, "percent_yes": 43.85933674604941, "percent_no": 56.14066325395059, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.548646", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.556335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.500078", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a section be added to the City Charter which would require binding arbitration before a three person arbitration panel of all unresolved disputes between the City and certain personnel of the Police and Fire Departments on all matters relating to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of City employment, including the interpretation and application of any existing labor agreements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7903, "fingerprint": "2006|200600048|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600048|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "11a02b410e333560", "measure_id": "200600048", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Without increasing taxes, shall the Santa Clara County Charter be extended to provide for the acquisition, development, maintenance, and operation of parks, by continuing the annual transfer from the general fund of an amount estimated to equal $0.01425 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation of all real and personal property commencing on July 1, 2009 for twelve years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 184867, "no_votes": 75129, "total_votes": 259996, "percent_yes": 71.10378621209557, "percent_no": 28.89621378790443, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.551928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.497319", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing taxes, shall the Santa Clara County Charter be extended to provide for the acquisition, development, maintenance, and operation of parks, by continuing the annual transfer from the general fund of an amount estimated to equal $0.01425 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation of all real and personal property commencing on July 1, 2009 for twelve years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11715, "fingerprint": "2006|200600424|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600424|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a044ebfef946dda7", "measure_id": "200600424", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Mountain View amend Section 503 of the City Charter to set the base salary of City Council at $1,500 per month, with an automatic annual adjustment, to become effective on January 1, 2009?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8585, "no_votes": 9168, "total_votes": 17753, "percent_yes": 48.35802399594435, "percent_no": 51.64197600405565, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.548325", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.556065", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.499893", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Mountain View amend Section 503 of the City Charter to set the base salary of City Council at $1,500 per month, with an automatic annual adjustment, to become effective on January 1, 2009?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7908, "fingerprint": "2006|200600170|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600170|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "7780a662a9334299", "measure_id": "200600170", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Foothill and De Anza Colleges, improve job training/university transfer, Upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, fire/seismic safety, Repair leaky roofs, Improve disabled access, Repair/expand classrooms for nurses/paramedics, Upgrade technology, Repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, libraries, sites, science/computer labs, shall Foothill-De Anza Community College District issue $490.8 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44924, "no_votes": 23468, "total_votes": 68392, "percent_yes": 65.6860451514797, "percent_no": 34.3139548485203, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.553358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.498237", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Foothill and De Anza Colleges, improve job training/university transfer, Upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, fire/seismic safety, Repair leaky roofs, Improve disabled access, Repair/expand classrooms for nurses/paramedics, Upgrade technology, Repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, libraries, sites, science/computer labs, shall Foothill-De Anza Community College District issue $490.8 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7912, "fingerprint": "2006|200600421|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600421|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "31f8d02819e757ca", "measure_id": "200600421", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1975, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino re-zoning a 5.19 acre parcel from Planned Development (Regional Shopping) to Planned Development (Regional Shopping/Residential) at 10123 N. Wolfe Road (Vallco), be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5378, "no_votes": 1058, "total_votes": 6436, "percent_yes": 83.56121814791796, "percent_no": 16.438781852082045, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.555179", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.499340", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1975, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino re-zoning a 5.19 acre parcel from Planned Development (Regional Shopping) to Planned Development (Regional Shopping/Residential) at 10123 N. Wolfe Road (Vallco), be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11714, "fingerprint": "2006|200600422|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600422|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ae1312dadeda658e", "measure_id": "200600422", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1977, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino rezoning a 32.58 gross acre parcel from Planned Industrial Zone, P(MP), to Planned Residential and Commercial, P(Res, Com), and Public Park, PR, located at north of Stevens Creek Boulevard and south of I-280 between Tantau Avenue and Finch Avenue (Toll Brothers), be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5586, "no_votes": 9729, "total_votes": 15315, "percent_yes": 36.47404505386876, "percent_no": 63.52595494613124, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.547658", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.555449", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.499524", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1977, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino rezoning a 32.58 gross acre parcel from Planned Industrial Zone, P(MP), to Planned Residential and Commercial, P(Res, Com), and Public Park, PR, located at north of Stevens Creek Boulevard and south of I-280 between Tantau Avenue and Finch Avenue (Toll Brothers), be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7909, "fingerprint": "2006|200600171|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600171|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "42950a9a9748a5ee", "measure_id": "200600171", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To advance educational achievement, enhance and maintain essential educational programs, prevent elimination of teacher positions, provide flexibility to expand programs in music and art, provide programs for students with difficulties in basics like reading and math, and upgrade technology in classrooms and libraries, shall Morgan Hill Unified School District collect a $96 yearly education tax for five years, providing an exemption for senior citizens, no money for administration, with citizen oversight and all money benefiting Morgan Hill schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5706, "no_votes": 4576, "total_votes": 10282, "percent_yes": 55.4950398755106, "percent_no": 44.5049601244894, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.553656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.498423", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To advance educational achievement, enhance and maintain essential educational programs, prevent elimination of teacher positions, provide flexibility to expand programs in music and art, provide programs for students with difficulties in basics like reading and math, and upgrade technology in classrooms and libraries, shall Morgan Hill Unified School District collect a $96 yearly education tax for five years, providing an exemption for senior citizens, no money for administration, with citizen oversight and all money benefiting Morgan Hill schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7913, "fingerprint": "2006|200600423|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600423|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "df0c86d943fc7ef6", "measure_id": "200600423", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Morgan Hill General Plan and Municipal Code Residential Development Control System to allow 100 additional residential allotments for projects of up to 25 units within the Downtown Core; and allowing earlier starts and completions for projects located within the Downtown RDCS Boundary allotted in March 2006; provided that all projects are consistent with the Downtown Plan and meet minimum RDCS scores?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5050, "no_votes": 4626, "total_votes": 9676, "percent_yes": 52.19098801157504, "percent_no": 47.80901198842496, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.555720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.499707", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the Morgan Hill General Plan and Municipal Code Residential Development Control System to allow 100 additional residential allotments for projects of up to 25 units within the Downtown Core; and allowing earlier starts and completions for projects located within the Downtown RDCS Boundary allotted in March 2006; provided that all projects are consistent with the Downtown Plan and meet minimum RDCS scores?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11717, "fingerprint": "2006|200600530|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600530|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0699d6cc08367433", "measure_id": "200600530", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by upgrading school facilities, shall Campbell Union High School District issue $90 million in bonds, within legal interest rates, for purposes including: Renovating older classrooms and deteriorating restrooms, including seismic upgrades; Improving access for disabled students and teachers; Modernizing libraries and homework centers; Enhancing computer learning technology; Improving facilities for vocational training, arts, physical education and school safety; Qualifying for state matching funds With annual financial/performance audits and independent citizen's oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32505, "no_votes": 23350, "total_votes": 55855, "percent_yes": 58.19532718646495, "percent_no": 41.80467281353505, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.548969", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.556621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.500258", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by upgrading school facilities, shall Campbell Union High School District issue $90 million in bonds, within legal interest rates, for purposes including: Renovating older classrooms and deteriorating restrooms, including seismic upgrades; Improving access for disabled students and teachers; Modernizing libraries and homework centers; Enhancing computer learning technology; Improving facilities for vocational training, arts, physical education and school safety; Qualifying for state matching funds With annual financial/performance audits and independent citizen's oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7911, "fingerprint": "2006|200600173|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600173|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8558f0532cb8a85a", "measure_id": "200600173", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the Oak Grove School District voters in 1991 be continued for four years, allowing the District to continue to expend funds generated by the existing special tax of $68 per parcel for remedial services, repair of school buildings and grounds, purchase of instructional supplies and equipment, installation of energy conservation equipment, and restoration of services reduced in prior years in the library, counseling, custodial and maintenance areas?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9644, "no_votes": 4970, "total_votes": 14614, "percent_yes": 65.99151498563022, "percent_no": 34.00848501436978, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.554191", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.498790", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the Oak Grove School District voters in 1991 be continued for four years, allowing the District to continue to expend funds generated by the existing special tax of $68 per parcel for remedial services, repair of school buildings and grounds, purchase of instructional supplies and equipment, installation of energy conservation equipment, and restoration of services reduced in prior years in the library, counseling, custodial and maintenance areas?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11719, "fingerprint": "2006|200600532|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600532|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "52d4ab0c09db10ed", "measure_id": "200600532", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without changing the existing amount of the Los Altos School District's current parcel tax, and to allow the District to spend the money raised to fulfill the voter-approved purposes, including to hire and retain teachers, maintain small class sizes and protect junior high electives, shall the District's annual appropriations limit be extended for a period of four years beginning July 1, 2007, in the amount of the funds raised by this tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12958, "no_votes": 3684, "total_votes": 16642, "percent_yes": 77.86323759163562, "percent_no": 22.136762408364376, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.549588", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.557165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.500624", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without changing the existing amount of the Los Altos School District's current parcel tax, and to allow the District to spend the money raised to fulfill the voter-approved purposes, including to hire and retain teachers, maintain small class sizes and protect junior high electives, shall the District's annual appropriations limit be extended for a period of four years beginning July 1, 2007, in the amount of the funds raised by this tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7905, "fingerprint": "2006|200600085|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600085|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "69a11abff7f982b5", "measure_id": "200600085", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do the Citizens of the CITY OF MORGAN HILL, CALIFORNIA ordain that Ordinance 835 N.S. Section II A. 2, regarding the portion zoned PUD-Commercial of the Morgan Hill Business Park, specifically the existing Cochrane Plaza shopping center, be amended to remove the prohibition on grocery supermarkets and to add grocery supermarkets as a permitted use?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5088, "no_votes": 1109, "total_votes": 6197, "percent_yes": 82.10424398902695, "percent_no": 17.895756010973045, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.552490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.497693", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do the Citizens of the CITY OF MORGAN HILL, CALIFORNIA ordain that Ordinance 835 N.S. Section II A. 2, regarding the portion zoned PUD-Commercial of the Morgan Hill Business Park, specifically the existing Cochrane Plaza shopping center, be amended to remove the prohibition on grocery supermarkets and to add grocery supermarkets as a permitted use?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11718, "fingerprint": "2006|200600531|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600531|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a3692540324e28bf", "measure_id": "200600531", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make schools safe, modernize classrooms, relieve overcrowding, and qualify for State grant funds, shall Evergreen School District: upgrade fire safety and security; repair aging roofs; improve instructional technology; improve and expand libraries; construct classrooms and schools and replace portables; renovate deteriorating restrooms; and construct, repair and renovate local school facilities; by issuing $150 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with citizens' oversight, independent annual audits, and no money for district operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15494, "no_votes": 5784, "total_votes": 21278, "percent_yes": 72.81699407839083, "percent_no": 27.183005921609166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.549280", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.556898", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.500440", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make schools safe, modernize classrooms, relieve overcrowding, and qualify for State grant funds, shall Evergreen School District: upgrade fire safety and security; repair aging roofs; improve instructional technology; improve and expand libraries; construct classrooms and schools and replace portables; renovate deteriorating restrooms; and construct, repair and renovate local school facilities; by issuing $150 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with citizens' oversight, independent annual audits, and no money for district operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7904, "fingerprint": "2006|200600084|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600084|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b9916c5271c69b1a", "measure_id": "200600084", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Milpitas City Council place before the voters a charter city proposal that would require the following: (1) a budget reserve only for emergencies and not salaries, (2) voter approval of future capital projects over $15 million, (3) increase City Council from five to seven members, (4) an open recruitment process for top city management, (5) scheduled performance audits for all city departments, and (6) voter approval for city charter amendments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2980, "no_votes": 4261, "total_votes": 7241, "percent_yes": 41.15453666620632, "percent_no": 58.84546333379368, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.552193", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.497509", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Milpitas City Council place before the voters a charter city proposal that would require the following: (1) a budget reserve only for emergencies and not salaries, (2) voter approval of future capital projects over $15 million, (3) increase City Council from five to seven members, (4) an open recruitment process for top city management, (5) scheduled performance audits for all city departments, and (6) voter approval for city charter amendments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7907, "fingerprint": "2006|200600087|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600087|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "05be6b48ef0821ec", "measure_id": "200600087", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the sale of City-owned property at 19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga, California (also known as the \"North Campus\") be approved as set forth in Resolution 06-016?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2092, "no_votes": 6462, "total_votes": 8554, "percent_yes": 24.45639466916062, "percent_no": 75.54360533083938, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.553056", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.498057", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the sale of City-owned property at 19848 Prospect Road, Saratoga, California (also known as the \"North Campus\") be approved as set forth in Resolution 06-016?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7906, "fingerprint": "2006|200600086|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600086|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "2eb80fda479414da", "measure_id": "200600086", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve fire suppression, emergency medical services and increase essential emergency facilities available for disaster response within the Evergreen and East Hills area, shall the City be authorized to construct a two-company fire station on one acre in Silver Creek Park?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89240, "no_votes": 36820, "total_votes": 126060, "percent_yes": 70.79168649849278, "percent_no": 29.20831350150722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.552789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.497873", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve fire suppression, emergency medical services and increase essential emergency facilities available for disaster response within the Evergreen and East Hills area, shall the City be authorized to construct a two-company fire station on one acre in Silver Creek Park?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7910, "fingerprint": "2006|200600172|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600172|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cbea02aaac021d02", "measure_id": "200600172", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of local elementary education, shall North County Joint Union School District provide additional classrooms, construct a cafeteria, upgrade, furnish and equip classrooms and school facilities, renovate and repair playfields, and construct parking lots to accommodate staff, students, and other visitors, by issuing $3,350,000 in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit with a citizens' oversight committee, audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 25, "percent_yes": 64.0, "percent_no": 36.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:33", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.553925", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.498608", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of local elementary education, shall North County Joint Union School District provide additional classrooms, construct a cafeteria, upgrade, furnish and equip classrooms and school facilities, renovate and repair playfields, and construct parking lots to accommodate staff, students, and other visitors, by issuing $3,350,000 in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit with a citizens' oversight committee, audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7914, "fingerprint": "2006|200600088|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600088|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "0921c37859e22d4b", "measure_id": "200600088", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City of Watsonville repeal Subdivision (b)(2) of Section 1122 of Article XI of the Charter of the City of Watsonville requiring a property tax to be collected for the purpose of paying the City's obligations to the public employees' retirement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2698, "no_votes": 2821, "total_votes": 5519, "percent_yes": 48.88566769342272, "percent_no": 51.11433230657728, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.557544", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.500811", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City of Watsonville repeal Subdivision (b)(2) of Section 1122 of Article XI of the Charter of the City of Watsonville requiring a property tax to be collected for the purpose of paying the City's obligations to the public employees' retirement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7916, "fingerprint": "2006|200600426|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600426|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "dc3afc00cc2cd2f3", "measure_id": "200600426", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City adopt an ordinance requiring employers in the City of Santa Cruz to pay a minimum wage of $9.25 per hour rather than the $6.75 per hour minimum wage required by State law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8693, "no_votes": 13571, "total_votes": 22264, "percent_yes": 39.04509522098455, "percent_no": 60.95490477901545, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.558182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.501178", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City adopt an ordinance requiring employers in the City of Santa Cruz to pay a minimum wage of $9.25 per hour rather than the $6.75 per hour minimum wage required by State law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7917, "fingerprint": "2006|200600427|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600427|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "189e83307df22fa3", "measure_id": "200600427", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the one-quarter of one percent City of Santa Cruz General Fund sales tax that was approved in 2004 for a five-year period be replaced with a one-half of one percent General Fund sales tax for local use only, without a sunset provision, to help limit future budget cuts, repair the City's streets, support public safety, and provide additional security and maintenance for City parks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12310, "no_votes": 8901, "total_votes": 21211, "percent_yes": 58.035924756022816, "percent_no": 41.964075243977184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.558450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.501356", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the one-quarter of one percent City of Santa Cruz General Fund sales tax that was approved in 2004 for a five-year period be replaced with a one-half of one percent General Fund sales tax for local use only, without a sunset provision, to help limit future budget cuts, repair the City's streets, support public safety, and provide additional security and maintenance for City parks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7918, "fingerprint": "2006|200600428|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600428|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a99bac79bba4e8f3", "measure_id": "200600428", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended to add an ordinance that promotes sustainable growth in the City by opposing the negative impacts of proposed University of California at Santa Cruz (\"UCSC\") growth and by prohibiting the City from providing services to the University necessary for University expansion until the University has fully implemented mitigation measures intended to offset the negative environmental impacts that will otherwise result from that expansion?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16486, "no_votes": 5021, "total_votes": 21507, "percent_yes": 76.6541126144976, "percent_no": 23.345887385502394, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.558719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.501535", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended to add an ordinance that promotes sustainable growth in the City by opposing the negative impacts of proposed University of California at Santa Cruz (\"UCSC\") growth and by prohibiting the City from providing services to the University necessary for University expansion until the University has fully implemented mitigation measures intended to offset the negative environmental impacts that will otherwise result from that expansion?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7919, "fingerprint": "2006|200600429|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600429|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ab2ee25939d113a9", "measure_id": "200600429", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to preserve the City's limited remaining water capacity that is available to current utility users and to conserve capacity in the City's wastewater treatment plant, shall the City of Santa Cruz Charter be amended to require a vote of the people before the City Council will be allowed to initiate an annexation to the City's water service area or sewer service area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16585, "no_votes": 4152, "total_votes": 20737, "percent_yes": 79.97781742778608, "percent_no": 20.02218257221392, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.558984", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.501718", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to preserve the City's limited remaining water capacity that is available to current utility users and to conserve capacity in the City's wastewater treatment plant, shall the City of Santa Cruz Charter be amended to require a vote of the people before the City Council will be allowed to initiate an annexation to the City's water service area or sewer service area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7920, "fingerprint": "2006|200600430|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600430|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "d80ad8451422f41f", "measure_id": "200600430", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended by adding an ordinance that requires Santa Cruz police officers and other law enforcement officers in the City of Santa Cruz to make enforcement of state and federal laws pertaining to the distribution, sale, cultivation or use of marijuana by adults their lowest law enforcement priority?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13969, "no_votes": 7900, "total_votes": 21869, "percent_yes": 63.87580593534226, "percent_no": 36.12419406465774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.559279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.501898", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended by adding an ordinance that requires Santa Cruz police officers and other law enforcement officers in the City of Santa Cruz to make enforcement of state and federal laws pertaining to the distribution, sale, cultivation or use of marijuana by adults their lowest law enforcement priority?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7921, "fingerprint": "2006|200600431|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600431|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "abd1ef1265443d4b", "measure_id": "200600431", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to maintain critical City services such as police, parks, fire and community services, neighborhood crime prevention, building code enforcement, gang prevention programs, road and pothole repair and other services provided by the City of Watsonville, shall the sales tax in Watsonville be increased by one quarter of one percent (0.25%) to be effective if the voters also cap the City's retirement tax collection rate at 7.7 cents per $100.00 of assessed value?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4159, "no_votes": 2776, "total_votes": 6935, "percent_yes": 59.97116077865897, "percent_no": 40.02883922134103, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.559548", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.502081", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain critical City services such as police, parks, fire and community services, neighborhood crime prevention, building code enforcement, gang prevention programs, road and pothole repair and other services provided by the City of Watsonville, shall the sales tax in Watsonville be increased by one quarter of one percent (0.25%) to be effective if the voters also cap the City's retirement tax collection rate at 7.7 cents per $100.00 of assessed value?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7922, "fingerprint": "2006|200600432|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600432|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "9930487518e3210f", "measure_id": "200600432", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Watsonville amend Subdivision (b) of Section 1122 of Article XI of the Charter of the City of Watsonville by adding a new Subdivision (3) which caps the retirement tax rate at 7.7 cents per $100.00 of assessed value, to be effective on July 1, 2007, if the voters also approve a one quarter of one percent (0.25%) sales tax increase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3477, "no_votes": 3346, "total_votes": 6823, "percent_yes": 50.95998827495237, "percent_no": 49.04001172504763, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.559872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.502263", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Watsonville amend Subdivision (b) of Section 1122 of Article XI of the Charter of the City of Watsonville by adding a new Subdivision (3) which caps the retirement tax rate at 7.7 cents per $100.00 of assessed value, to be effective on July 1, 2007, if the voters also approve a one quarter of one percent (0.25%) sales tax increase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7915, "fingerprint": "2006|200600174|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600174|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "cf15c35f12723e21", "measure_id": "200600174", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "School Repair Measure. To improve safety conditions of neighborhood schools, replace relocatable classrooms and to construct, acquire, upgrade and equip classrooms, facilities and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $23,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, maintain its Citizens' Oversight Committee and enforce strict financial accountability guidelines to guarantee that no bond money used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 19, "percent_yes": 52.63157894736842, "percent_no": 47.36842105263158, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.557846", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.500994", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "School Repair Measure. To improve safety conditions of neighborhood schools, replace relocatable classrooms and to construct, acquire, upgrade and equip classrooms, facilities and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $23,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, maintain its Citizens' Oversight Committee and enforce strict financial accountability guidelines to guarantee that no bond money used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7923, "fingerprint": "2006|200600175|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600175|SHASTA", "content_hash": "b6f9b69669f5d753", "measure_id": "200600175", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide classroom space, replace or repair heating, ventilating, energy and electrical systems, upgrade instructional computers and technology and enhance the learning environment and student safety by constructing, renovating and acquiring school buildings and facilities at each District school site as indicated in the Bond Project List; shall the Anderson Union High School District issue $25,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, perform annual audits, use no bond money for administrative salaries and appoint a volunteer Citizens' oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3867, "no_votes": 4549, "total_votes": 8416, "percent_yes": 45.94819391634981, "percent_no": 54.05180608365019, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.560142", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.502524", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide classroom space, replace or repair heating, ventilating, energy and electrical systems, upgrade instructional computers and technology and enhance the learning environment and student safety by constructing, renovating and acquiring school buildings and facilities at each District school site as indicated in the Bond Project List; shall the Anderson Union High School District issue $25,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, perform annual audits, use no bond money for administrative salaries and appoint a volunteer Citizens' oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7924, "fingerprint": "2006|200600176|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600176|SHASTA", "content_hash": "6b95ae363a81e740", "measure_id": "200600176", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and provide quality education by completing replacement and repair of leaky roofs, deteriorated bathrooms, removing asbestos, reducing earthquake hazards, installing fire safety systems, upgrading electrical wiring to accommodate modern technology, installing energy efficient classroom heating, cooling, ventilation systems, upgrading plumbing, constructing/acquiring/equipping classrooms/facilities/sites, shall Gateway Unified School District issue $14.5 million of bonds, at legal rates, with guaranteed financial audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3331, "no_votes": 3096, "total_votes": 6427, "percent_yes": 51.8282246771433, "percent_no": 48.1717753228567, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.560410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.502716", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and provide quality education by completing replacement and repair of leaky roofs, deteriorated bathrooms, removing asbestos, reducing earthquake hazards, installing fire safety systems, upgrading electrical wiring to accommodate modern technology, installing energy efficient classroom heating, cooling, ventilation systems, upgrading plumbing, constructing/acquiring/equipping classrooms/facilities/sites, shall Gateway Unified School District issue $14.5 million of bonds, at legal rates, with guaranteed financial audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7925, "fingerprint": "2006|200600433|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600433|SHASTA", "content_hash": "3a7bda3ca5b24812", "measure_id": "200600433", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance amending the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance requiring larger residential lots, amending rules regarding use of septic systems within the R-R Zoning District and addressing non-conforming uses be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1315, "no_votes": 1446, "total_votes": 2761, "percent_yes": 47.62767113364723, "percent_no": 52.37232886635277, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.560814", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.502902", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance amending the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance requiring larger residential lots, amending rules regarding use of septic systems within the R-R Zoning District and addressing non-conforming uses be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7928, "fingerprint": "2006|200600533|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600533|SIERRA", "content_hash": "dde58e3d7b16b4da", "measure_id": "200600533", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For decreasing the number of members of the governing board of Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District from seven to five.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1296, "no_votes": 248, "total_votes": 1544, "percent_yes": 83.93782383419689, "percent_no": 16.06217616580311, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.561676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.503446", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For decreasing the number of members of the governing board of Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District from seven to five.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7929, "fingerprint": "2006|200600534|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600534|SIERRA", "content_hash": "74cf97eb40d58f2d", "measure_id": "200600534", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the rearrangement of trustee areas in the Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1098, "no_votes": 392, "total_votes": 1490, "percent_yes": 73.69127516778524, "percent_no": 26.308724832214764, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.561947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.503650", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the rearrangement of trustee areas in the Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7930, "fingerprint": "2006|200600535|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600535|SIERRA", "content_hash": "538ae863f767b40c", "measure_id": "200600535", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To rearrange the trustee areas using population as the criteria.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 953, "no_votes": 551, "total_votes": 1504, "percent_yes": 63.36436170212766, "percent_no": 36.63563829787234, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.562209", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.503836", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To rearrange the trustee areas using population as the criteria.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7931, "fingerprint": "2006|200600536|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600536|SIERRA", "content_hash": "fca0cc252d508455", "measure_id": "200600536", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To rearrange the trustee areas using geography as the criteria.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 537, "no_votes": 939, "total_votes": 1476, "percent_yes": 36.38211382113821, "percent_no": 63.61788617886179, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.562472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.504018", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To rearrange the trustee areas using geography as the criteria.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7926, "fingerprint": "2006|200600049|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600049|SIERRA", "content_hash": "448538099d975348", "measure_id": "200600049", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Sierra County Transient Occupancy Tax be applied to federally owned campgrounds and other properties that are occupied for transient lodging, as provided for in Sierra County Ordinance No. 972?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 804, "no_votes": 630, "total_votes": 1434, "percent_yes": 56.06694560669456, "percent_no": 43.93305439330544, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.561084", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.503082", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sierra County Transient Occupancy Tax be applied to federally owned campgrounds and other properties that are occupied for transient lodging, as provided for in Sierra County Ordinance No. 972?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7927, "fingerprint": "2006|200600434|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600434|SIERRA", "content_hash": "0b868c6e1ff3e902", "measure_id": "200600434", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Loyalton fluoridate its drinking water supply?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 137, "no_votes": 175, "total_votes": 312, "percent_yes": 43.91025641025641, "percent_no": 56.08974358974359, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.561351", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.503265", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Loyalton fluoridate its drinking water supply?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7932, "fingerprint": "2006|200600089|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600089|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "3109eb837505c438", "measure_id": "200600089", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Title 3.12 of the Municipal Code of the City of Yreka be amended to extend the transient occupancy tax to apply to transients staying in recreational vehicle parks, campgrounds, bed and breakfasts, and residential vacation rentals?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1057, "no_votes": 935, "total_votes": 1992, "percent_yes": 53.06224899598394, "percent_no": 46.93775100401606, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.562735", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.504196", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Title 3.12 of the Municipal Code of the City of Yreka be amended to extend the transient occupancy tax to apply to transients staying in recreational vehicle parks, campgrounds, bed and breakfasts, and residential vacation rentals?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7933, "fingerprint": "2006|200600249|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600249|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "419147942a765b8e", "measure_id": "200600249", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a special parcel tax commencing in fiscal year 2007-2008 to provide park and recreation services, to replace the existing special tax for such services approved by the voters of the district on June 3, 1997 at the rates and for the land use categories specified in resolution 03, 2006?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 216, "no_votes": 337, "total_votes": 553, "percent_yes": 39.05967450271247, "percent_no": 60.94032549728753, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.562999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.504379", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a special parcel tax commencing in fiscal year 2007-2008 to provide park and recreation services, to replace the existing special tax for such services approved by the voters of the district on June 3, 1997 at the rates and for the land use categories specified in resolution 03, 2006?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7934, "fingerprint": "2006|200600250|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600250|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "7bfd95811fed4aae", "measure_id": "200600250", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a new special parcel tax to replace the existing special tax enacted by the voters on June 3, 1997 commencing in fiscal year 2007-2008 to provide fire protection, emergency response and ambulance services at the rates and for the land use categories specified in resolution 04, 2006?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 272, "no_votes": 281, "total_votes": 553, "percent_yes": 49.186256781193485, "percent_no": 50.813743218806515, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.563264", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.504570", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a new special parcel tax to replace the existing special tax enacted by the voters on June 3, 1997 commencing in fiscal year 2007-2008 to provide fire protection, emergency response and ambulance services at the rates and for the land use categories specified in resolution 04, 2006?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7936, "fingerprint": "2006|200600537|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600537|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "480451c99376a7bd", "measure_id": "200600537", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Etna Union High School District be unified with the Etna Union Elementary School District, the Fort Jones Union School District, and the Quartz Valley School District, while preserving the Forks of Salmon School District as a separate school district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1398, "no_votes": 842, "total_votes": 2240, "percent_yes": 62.410714285714285, "percent_no": 37.589285714285715, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.563794", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.504930", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Etna Union High School District be unified with the Etna Union Elementary School District, the Fort Jones Union School District, and the Quartz Valley School District, while preserving the Forks of Salmon School District as a separate school district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7935, "fingerprint": "2006|200600435|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600435|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "cd5ee2d2fa293c64", "measure_id": "200600435", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Yreka levy an annual special tax for the Yreka Volunteer Fire Department on each improved legal parcel within the City, which shall be payable in monthly installments to the City of Yreka, and which will be used to pay for training, wages and benefits of firefighters, acquiring Fire Fighting or Rescue equipment or vehicles and improving or constructing fire stations, sub-stations, or training facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1655, "no_votes": 794, "total_votes": 2449, "percent_yes": 67.5786035116374, "percent_no": 32.4213964883626, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.563529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.504751", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Yreka levy an annual special tax for the Yreka Volunteer Fire Department on each improved legal parcel within the City, which shall be payable in monthly installments to the City of Yreka, and which will be used to pay for training, wages and benefits of firefighters, acquiring Fire Fighting or Rescue equipment or vehicles and improving or constructing fire stations, sub-stations, or training facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7937, "fingerprint": "2006|200600177|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600177|SOLANO", "content_hash": "e118b31be26f06ed", "measure_id": "200600177", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide specific funding for clearly identified programs that will continue to attract and retain highly qualified teachers and other employees and ensure a safe learning environment in Benicia's Public Schools with the goal of continually improving student performance, shall Benicia Unified School District be authorized to levy a parcel tax at $254 annual rate for five years, offering senior and low-income exemptions, with expenditures monitored by a citizens' oversight committee and independent auditor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4029, "no_votes": 3396, "total_votes": 7425, "percent_yes": 54.26262626262627, "percent_no": 45.73737373737373, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.564114", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.505113", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide specific funding for clearly identified programs that will continue to attract and retain highly qualified teachers and other employees and ensure a safe learning environment in Benicia's Public Schools with the goal of continually improving student performance, shall Benicia Unified School District be authorized to levy a parcel tax at $254 annual rate for five years, offering senior and low-income exemptions, with expenditures monitored by a citizens' oversight committee and independent auditor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7938, "fingerprint": "2006|200600251|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600251|SOLANO", "content_hash": "16822679910faa1a", "measure_id": "200600251", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance proposed by the initiative petition to readopt and amend certain provisions of the Orderly Growth Initiative of 1994 to require voter approval until December 31, 2036 for changes to the Solano County General Plan relating to Agriculture or Open Space policies and land use designations be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46808, "no_votes": 51776, "total_votes": 98584, "percent_yes": 47.48032135032053, "percent_no": 52.51967864967947, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.564385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.505298", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance proposed by the initiative petition to readopt and amend certain provisions of the Orderly Growth Initiative of 1994 to require voter approval until December 31, 2036 for changes to the Solano County General Plan relating to Agriculture or Open Space policies and land use designations be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7940, "fingerprint": "2006|200600437|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600437|SOLANO", "content_hash": "b443adfd7e6a3508", "measure_id": "200600437", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 618, which would authorize the City of Rio Vista to impose a hotel tax (transient occupancy tax) equivalent to ten percent of the rent charged by hotels and eliminate the existing tax of eight percent of a hotel's gross receipts, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1764, "no_votes": 1053, "total_votes": 2817, "percent_yes": 62.61980830670927, "percent_no": 37.38019169329073, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.564920", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.505664", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 618, which would authorize the City of Rio Vista to impose a hotel tax (transient occupancy tax) equivalent to ten percent of the rent charged by hotels and eliminate the existing tax of eight percent of a hotel's gross receipts, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7939, "fingerprint": "2006|200600436|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600436|SOLANO", "content_hash": "2cf2d5e9fbe8ce25", "measure_id": "200600436", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Dixon City Ordinance no. 06-004, establishing monthly sewer user charges, be repealed and monthly sewer user charges be reestablished at the rates in effect prior to the adoption of Ordinance no. 06-004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2781, "no_votes": 1944, "total_votes": 4725, "percent_yes": 58.85714285714285, "percent_no": 41.14285714285715, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.564653", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.505479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Dixon City Ordinance no. 06-004, establishing monthly sewer user charges, be repealed and monthly sewer user charges be reestablished at the rates in effect prior to the adoption of Ordinance no. 06-004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11721, "fingerprint": "2006|200600538|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600538|SONOMA", "content_hash": "76a3e5c8ca4e81e7", "measure_id": "200600538", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $151.82 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 4%, for no more than six years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 640, "no_votes": 403, "total_votes": 1043, "percent_yes": 61.3614573346117, "percent_no": 38.6385426653883, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.560018", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.567284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.507133", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $151.82 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 4%, for no more than six years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11720, "fingerprint": "2006|200600007|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600007|SONOMA", "content_hash": "8e60a6ae7875b7d5", "measure_id": "200600007", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Kenwood School District, serving the children of Kenwood, provide funds for the purpose of reduction of class size and maintenance and enhancement of academic and educational programs by levying a special tax assessment on each assessor's parcel of $52.00 per year ($26.00 per semi-annual payment) for a period of five years, beginning July 1, 2007, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1461, "no_votes": 561, "total_votes": 2022, "percent_yes": 72.25519287833828, "percent_no": 27.744807121661722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.557726", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.565584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.506030", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Kenwood School District, serving the children of Kenwood, provide funds for the purpose of reduction of class size and maintenance and enhancement of academic and educational programs by levying a special tax assessment on each assessor's parcel of $52.00 per year ($26.00 per semi-annual payment) for a period of five years, beginning July 1, 2007, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7941, "fingerprint": "2006|200600004|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600004|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9efc0dc2fea60f50", "measure_id": "200600004", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on July 6, 2005, by the Sonoma Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering a reorganization providing for the annexation of territory to the City of Santa Rosa and simultaneous detachment of that territory from the Rincon Valley Fire Protection District and County Service Area No. 41 (Multi-Services) be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7, "no_votes": 8, "total_votes": 15, "percent_yes": 46.66666666666666, "percent_no": 53.33333333333334, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-02-14", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.565186", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.505848", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on July 6, 2005, by the Sonoma Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering a reorganization providing for the annexation of territory to the City of Santa Rosa and simultaneous detachment of that territory from the Rincon Valley Fire Protection District and County Service Area No. 41 (Multi-Services) be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7942, "fingerprint": "2006|200600018|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600018|SONOMA", "content_hash": "6df9c6820b2c2c66", "measure_id": "200600018", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance computer and technology education, increase library hours, expand classroom music, preserve band programs, create science labs, provide additional help to children who excel and those who struggle with math and reading, shall the Rincon Valley Union School District replace its existing $39 parcel tax with a $60 annual tax on each legal parcel for twelve years beginning July 1, 2006, subsequent annual $3 increases and complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by senior citizens 65 years and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6881, "no_votes": 3164, "total_votes": 10045, "percent_yes": 68.50174216027874, "percent_no": 31.498257839721262, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.565859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.506210", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance computer and technology education, increase library hours, expand classroom music, preserve band programs, create science labs, provide additional help to children who excel and those who struggle with math and reading, shall the Rincon Valley Union School District replace its existing $39 parcel tax with a $60 annual tax on each legal parcel for twelve years beginning July 1, 2006, subsequent annual $3 increases and complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by senior citizens 65 years and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7943, "fingerprint": "2006|200600192|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600192|SONOMA", "content_hash": "77c5a7b44e3ff9fd", "measure_id": "200600192", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1 of the Cazadero Community Services District, imposing for 20 years a special tax of $225.00 per parcel, as defined in the Ordinance, but excluding parcels on which no other property tax is due, in order to fund construction, operation, and maintenance of a community center/museum facility, and increasing the District's appropriations limit to $3 million for four years to permit spending the revenue raised by the tax, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50, "no_votes": 366, "total_votes": 416, "percent_yes": 12.01923076923077, "percent_no": 87.98076923076923, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-08-29", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.566127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.506396", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1 of the Cazadero Community Services District, imposing for 20 years a special tax of $225.00 per parcel, as defined in the Ordinance, but excluding parcels on which no other property tax is due, in order to fund construction, operation, and maintenance of a community center/museum facility, and increasing the District's appropriations limit to $3 million for four years to permit spending the revenue raised by the tax, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7944, "fingerprint": "2006|200600252|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600252|SONOMA", "content_hash": "809d4210480b2911", "measure_id": "200600252", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To preserve natural lands from development; protect working farms and ranches; protect drinking water sources; improve water quality in lakes, rivers and streams; create and improve parks and trails; and preserve the coastline and beaches, shall the current quarter-cent sales tax, funding the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation & Open Space District, be continued for twenty years, and bonds authorized to finance projects, with required independent audits and citizen oversight without increasing taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126570, "no_votes": 40528, "total_votes": 167098, "percent_yes": 75.74596943111229, "percent_no": 24.254030568887714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.566394", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.506582", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve natural lands from development; protect working farms and ranches; protect drinking water sources; improve water quality in lakes, rivers and streams; create and improve parks and trails; and preserve the coastline and beaches, shall the current quarter-cent sales tax, funding the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation & Open Space District, be continued for twenty years, and bonds authorized to finance projects, with required independent audits and citizen oversight without increasing taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7945, "fingerprint": "2006|200600438|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600438|SONOMA", "content_hash": "84519775eb0f5165", "measure_id": "200600438", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax from ten (10) percent to twelve (12) percent be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 902, "no_votes": 1604, "total_votes": 2506, "percent_yes": 35.99361532322426, "percent_no": 64.00638467677574, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.566688", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.506766", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax from ten (10) percent to twelve (12) percent be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7946, "fingerprint": "2006|200600439|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600439|SONOMA", "content_hash": "289e01b457f2cce3", "measure_id": "200600439", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Petaluma City Council take all lawful steps to oppose gaming on approximately 277 acres of land south of Petaluma between Highway 101 and the Petaluma River opposite Kastania Road, including: opposing the United States placing such property into trust for the Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians; and urging all other governmental officials with authority concerning gaming on such property to oppose such gaming consistent with the will of the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16389, "no_votes": 4294, "total_votes": 20683, "percent_yes": 79.23898854131413, "percent_no": 20.76101145868587, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.566953", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.506948", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Petaluma City Council take all lawful steps to oppose gaming on approximately 277 acres of land south of Petaluma between Highway 101 and the Petaluma River opposite Kastania Road, including: opposing the United States placing such property into trust for the Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians; and urging all other governmental officials with authority concerning gaming on such property to oppose such gaming consistent with the will of the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7956, "fingerprint": "2006|200600541|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600541|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "03d4b2710b434e0a", "measure_id": "200600541", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance student learning, shall the Sylvan Union School District repair, renovate, and upgrade aging school facilities, including technology, infrastructure, and other improvements; construct, expand, furnish and equip school facilities, including acquisition of school sites, completion of new schools and construction of food service facilities; help qualify for matching State funds, by issuing $40,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with NO proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries and accountability provided by citizens\u2019 oversight and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9402, "no_votes": 7124, "total_votes": 16526, "percent_yes": 56.89216991407479, "percent_no": 43.10783008592521, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.570362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.509121", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance student learning, shall the Sylvan Union School District repair, renovate, and upgrade aging school facilities, including technology, infrastructure, and other improvements; construct, expand, furnish and equip school facilities, including acquisition of school sites, completion of new schools and construction of food service facilities; help qualify for matching State funds, by issuing $40,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with NO proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries and accountability provided by citizens\u2019 oversight and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7949, "fingerprint": "2006|200600253|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600253|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "271ea8608d90fb68", "measure_id": "200600253", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Keyes Community Services District\u2019s service charge for street lighting be increased from $10 to $19 a year for each parcel of land within the District, effective January 1, 2007?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 161, "no_votes": 394, "total_votes": 555, "percent_yes": 29.009009009009, "percent_no": 70.99099099099101, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.568197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.507775", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Keyes Community Services District\u2019s service charge for street lighting be increased from $10 to $19 a year for each parcel of land within the District, effective January 1, 2007?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7955, "fingerprint": "2006|200600540|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600540|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "daea6281139bc365", "measure_id": "200600540", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize Oakdale High and enlarge the Career Technical/Vocational classrooms, to build and modernize elementary schools, replace portables, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District issue $37.5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3826, "no_votes": 4651, "total_votes": 8477, "percent_yes": 45.1338917069718, "percent_no": 54.8661082930282, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.570081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.508931", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize Oakdale High and enlarge the Career Technical/Vocational classrooms, to build and modernize elementary schools, replace portables, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District issue $37.5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7950, "fingerprint": "2006|200600254|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600254|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "7943bf39d5af8e0e", "measure_id": "200600254", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To relieve traffic congestion, improve safety, match state/federal funds by: widening/improving Routes I-5, 99, 132, 219/108, purchasing land for 120 Oakdale Bypass; fixing potholes/resurfacing local roads, synchronizing traffic signals; improving high accident locations countywide; improving commuter rail and transit services for seniors/disabled; requiring Independent Taxpayers\u2019 Oversight Committee to conduct audits ensuring all voter mandates are met; by authorizing a half-cent transportation sales tax for no longer than thirty years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58846, "no_votes": 42760, "total_votes": 101606, "percent_yes": 57.91587110997381, "percent_no": 42.08412889002619, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.568473", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.507986", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve traffic congestion, improve safety, match state/federal funds by: widening/improving Routes I-5, 99, 132, 219/108, purchasing land for 120 Oakdale Bypass; fixing potholes/resurfacing local roads, synchronizing traffic signals; improving high accident locations countywide; improving commuter rail and transit services for seniors/disabled; requiring Independent Taxpayers\u2019 Oversight Committee to conduct audits ensuring all voter mandates are met; by authorizing a half-cent transportation sales tax for no longer than thirty years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7948, "fingerprint": "2006|200600178|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600178|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "f9a067d1d9c31eb3", "measure_id": "200600178", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize Oakdale High and Enlarge the Career Technical/Vocational classrooms modernize elementary schools, replace portables, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District issue $37.5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2519, "no_votes": 3023, "total_votes": 5542, "percent_yes": 45.45290508841573, "percent_no": 54.54709491158427, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.567924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.507507", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize Oakdale High and Enlarge the Career Technical/Vocational classrooms modernize elementary schools, replace portables, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District issue $37.5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7947, "fingerprint": "2006|200600090|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600090|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "d9e778e58b2166be", "measure_id": "200600090", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Using state, federal, and redevelopment agency funds specifically earmarked for that purpose, without increasing locally imposed taxes or using funds from the City\u2019s General Fund, shall the City of Turlock finance, construct, or acquire housing developments, to make available rental housing affordable to low-income households and individuals including, but not limited to, senior citizens and disabled persons, not to exceed one hundred fifty (150) housing units per calendar year carried over from year to year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4827, "no_votes": 3365, "total_votes": 8192, "percent_yes": 58.92333984375, "percent_no": 41.07666015625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.567647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.507314", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Using state, federal, and redevelopment agency funds specifically earmarked for that purpose, without increasing locally imposed taxes or using funds from the City\u2019s General Fund, shall the City of Turlock finance, construct, or acquire housing developments, to make available rental housing affordable to low-income households and individuals including, but not limited to, senior citizens and disabled persons, not to exceed one hundred fifty (150) housing units per calendar year carried over from year to year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7953, "fingerprint": "2006|200600442|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600442|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "1cf824abc5334a3b", "measure_id": "200600442", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing locally-imposed taxes or using any of the City's General Fund, shall developers and/or public agencies whose purpose is to provide affordable housing, be authorized to construct, acquire and rehabilitate up to fifty (50) housing units per year carried over from year to year on scattered sites throughout the city, to make available rental housing affordable to low and moderate-income households, including but not limited to senior citizens and disabled persons?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1881, "no_votes": 1685, "total_votes": 3566, "percent_yes": 52.74817722938867, "percent_no": 47.25182277061133, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.569334", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.508543", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing locally-imposed taxes or using any of the City's General Fund, shall developers and/or public agencies whose purpose is to provide affordable housing, be authorized to construct, acquire and rehabilitate up to fifty (50) housing units per year carried over from year to year on scattered sites throughout the city, to make available rental housing affordable to low and moderate-income households, including but not limited to senior citizens and disabled persons?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7954, "fingerprint": "2006|200600539|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600539|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "aaf4fc3044b245ca", "measure_id": "200600539", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Chatom Union School District be authorized to construct a community center/gym/multipurpose room, modernize outdated school facilities and infrastructure, convert classrooms at Mountain View School for program expansion, upgrade health and safety systems to meet current standards, and improve student access to computers and modern technology by issuing $5,000,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 617, "no_votes": 390, "total_votes": 1007, "percent_yes": 61.27110228401192, "percent_no": 38.72889771598808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.569729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.508735", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Chatom Union School District be authorized to construct a community center/gym/multipurpose room, modernize outdated school facilities and infrastructure, convert classrooms at Mountain View School for program expansion, upgrade health and safety systems to meet current standards, and improve student access to computers and modern technology by issuing $5,000,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and NO money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7951, "fingerprint": "2006|200600440|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600440|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "6b8c79a606505ade", "measure_id": "200600440", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be changed from two (2) years to four (4) years effective at the election for Mayor on November 6, 2007?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3436, "no_votes": 2904, "total_votes": 6340, "percent_yes": 54.19558359621451, "percent_no": 45.80441640378549, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.568742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.508180", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be changed from two (2) years to four (4) years effective at the election for Mayor on November 6, 2007?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7952, "fingerprint": "2006|200600441|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600441|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200600441", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3162, "no_votes": 3080, "total_votes": 6242, "percent_yes": 50.656840756167895, "percent_no": 49.343159243832105, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.569017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.508362", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7958, "fingerprint": "2006|200600543|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600543|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "4e69f3edded01f84", "measure_id": "200600543", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize the Girls\u2019 Gymnasium, the Performing Arts Building, the Agriculture Building and the Boys\u2019 Gymnasium at Turlock High School, and for other specified modernization projects there and at Roselawn High School, shall the Turlock Unified School District issue $7,725,000 in bonds with lawful interest rates and maturity dates, with annual independent audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee to assure that funds are spent only on the specified school and classroom improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8823, "no_votes": 7083, "total_votes": 15906, "percent_yes": 55.46963410033949, "percent_no": 44.53036589966051, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.570984", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.509500", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize the Girls\u2019 Gymnasium, the Performing Arts Building, the Agriculture Building and the Boys\u2019 Gymnasium at Turlock High School, and for other specified modernization projects there and at Roselawn High School, shall the Turlock Unified School District issue $7,725,000 in bonds with lawful interest rates and maturity dates, with annual independent audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee to assure that funds are spent only on the specified school and classroom improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7957, "fingerprint": "2006|200600542|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600542|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "7f8cae99b5c68607", "measure_id": "200600542", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize Brown, Crowell, Cunningham, Julien, Osborn and Wakefield Elementary Schools, Crane Early Learning Center, and Dutcher Middle School, and to develop architectural plans for a future elementary school; shall Turlock Unified School District issue $9,900,000 in School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 bonds with lawful interest rates and maturity dates, with annual independent audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee to assure that funds are spent only on the specified school and classroom improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8449, "no_votes": 5726, "total_votes": 14175, "percent_yes": 59.60493827160494, "percent_no": 40.39506172839506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.570709", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.509312", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize Brown, Crowell, Cunningham, Julien, Osborn and Wakefield Elementary Schools, Crane Early Learning Center, and Dutcher Middle School, and to develop architectural plans for a future elementary school; shall Turlock Unified School District issue $9,900,000 in School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 bonds with lawful interest rates and maturity dates, with annual independent audits and a citizens\u2019 oversight committee to assure that funds are spent only on the specified school and classroom improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7961, "fingerprint": "2006|200600544|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600544|SUTTER", "content_hash": "74aa9ac275cf6a9a", "measure_id": "200600544", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math science, healthcare, nursing, policy, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College district issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12762, "no_votes": 10164, "total_votes": 22926, "percent_yes": 55.66605600628108, "percent_no": 44.33394399371892, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.571809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.510062", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math science, healthcare, nursing, policy, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College district issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7960, "fingerprint": "2006|200600179|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600179|SUTTER", "content_hash": "a3fc03a2966e02bc", "measure_id": "200600179", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide Franklin Elementary School with a modern multi-purpose structure housing a gymnasium, kitchen, indoor stage area and additional classroom space, shall the Franklin Elementary School District issue bonds in the amount of $2,000,000 with an interest rate within the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 452, "no_votes": 272, "total_votes": 724, "percent_yes": 62.430939226519335, "percent_no": 37.569060773480665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.571530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.509882", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide Franklin Elementary School with a modern multi-purpose structure housing a gymnasium, kitchen, indoor stage area and additional classroom space, shall the Franklin Elementary School District issue bonds in the amount of $2,000,000 with an interest rate within the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7959, "fingerprint": "2006|200600050|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600050|SUTTER", "content_hash": "862eaa114d0c53f5", "measure_id": "200600050", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on December 1 2005, by the Sutter County Local Agency Formation Commission ordering a reorganization that annexes 395\u00b1 acres to the City of Yuba City and detachment of the property from County Service Area \"G\" and the Consolidated Street Lighting District be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107, "no_votes": 139, "total_votes": 246, "percent_yes": 43.49593495934959, "percent_no": 56.50406504065041, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.571257", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.509694", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on December 1 2005, by the Sutter County Local Agency Formation Commission ordering a reorganization that annexes 395\u00b1 acres to the City of Yuba City and detachment of the property from County Service Area \"G\" and the Consolidated Street Lighting District be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1180, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1158|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1158|Statewide", "content_hash": "eebca6055178d80d", "measure_id": "CA1158", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1A", "description": "Transportation Investment Fund. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 77.0, "percent_no": 23.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a constitutional restriction preventing the legislat...", "summary_text": "This measure established a constitutional restriction preventing the legislature from using transportation-related tax revenues for non-transportation purposes. It required that funds from gas taxes, vehicle fees, and other transportation revenues be spent exclusively on transportation projects and programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1A", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1A_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201A%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201A%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1179, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1157|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1157|Statewide", "content_hash": "102f98806b78f1a5", "measure_id": "CA1157", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 83", "description": "Sex Offenders. Sexually Violent Predators. Punishment, Residence Restrictions and Monitoring. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.5, "percent_no": 29.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure increased penalties for sex offenses, prohibited registered sex ...", "summary_text": "This measure increased penalties for sex offenses, prohibited registered sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of schools and parks, and expanded lifetime GPS monitoring requirements for certain offenders. It also strengthened civil commitment procedures for sexually violent predators and increased funding for law enforcement monitoring programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 83", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_83_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2083%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2083%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1178, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1156|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1156|Statewide", "content_hash": "d2d84457b1a94f93", "measure_id": "CA1156", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1E", "description": "Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.30000305, "percent_no": 35.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $4", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $4.09 billion in general obligation bonds to fund disaster preparedness and flood prevention projects, including levee improvements, flood control systems, and emergency response infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1E", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1E_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201E%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201E%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1177, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1155|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1155|Statewide", "content_hash": "0ca4b31bd5c2b436", "measure_id": "CA1155", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1B", "description": "Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, Port Security Bond Act of 2006", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.5, "percent_no": 38.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized $19", "summary_text": "This measure authorized $19.925 billion in general obligation bonds to fund transportation infrastructure projects including highway improvements, public transit, port security enhancements, and air quality programs. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over approximately 30 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1B", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1B_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201B%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201B%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1176, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1154|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1154|Statewide", "content_hash": "0ccf2b277265028b", "measure_id": "CA1154", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1C", "description": "Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2006", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.79999924, "percent_no": 42.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $2", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $2.85 billion in general obligation bonds to fund housing programs for low-income residents, veterans, seniors, disabled individuals, and homeless shelters. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1C", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1C_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201C%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201C%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1175, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1153|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1153|Statewide", "content_hash": "d099e9a257fdc5a1", "measure_id": "CA1153", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1D", "description": "Education Facilities: Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2006", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.0, "percent_no": 43.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $10", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $10.4 billion in general obligation bonds to fund construction, renovation, and equipment for public education facilities from kindergarten through university level. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over approximately 30 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1D", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1D_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201D%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201D%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1174, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1152|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1152|Statewide", "content_hash": "a3ae22524f54e576", "measure_id": "CA1152", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 84", "description": "Water Quality, Safety and Supply. Flood Control. Natural Resource Protection. Park Improvements. Bonds. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.90000153, "percent_no": 46.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue $5", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue $5.4 billion in general obligation bonds to fund water quality and supply projects, flood control infrastructure, natural resource protection, and park improvements. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over several decades.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 84", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_84_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2084%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2084%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1173, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1151|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1151|Statewide", "content_hash": "0d931f4c03e39922", "measure_id": "CA1151", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 86", "description": "Tax on Cigarettes. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.29999924, "percent_no": 51.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed an additional $2", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed an additional $2.60 tax per pack of cigarettes and equivalent taxes on other tobacco products, with revenues funding emergency medical services, nursing education, tobacco use prevention programs, and research on childhood diseases. The tax would have been added to existing state and federal tobacco taxes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 86", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_86_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2086%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2086%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1172, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1150|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1150|Statewide", "content_hash": "9c8aa981a46cf431", "measure_id": "CA1150", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 90", "description": "Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.59999847, "percent_no": 52.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to require the st...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to require the state to pay property owners when government regulations reduce property values, and to restrict the government's ability to use eminent domain for private development projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 90", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_90_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2090%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2090%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1171, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1149|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1149|Statewide", "content_hash": "da27e186976c8f70", "measure_id": "CA1149", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 81", "description": "California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2006.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.90000153, "percent_no": 53.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized $600 million in general obligation bonds t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized $600 million in general obligation bonds to fund construction and renovation of public library facilities throughout California. The bonds would have been repaid through property taxes over time to improve library infrastructure and services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 81", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_81_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2081%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2081%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1170, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1148|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1148|Statewide", "content_hash": "14ef877b728a6204", "measure_id": "CA1148", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 85", "description": "Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor's Pregnancy. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.70000076, "percent_no": 54.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Abortion\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to require a 48-h...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to require a 48-hour waiting period and parental notification before a minor could obtain an abortion, with exceptions for medical emergencies and cases involving parental abuse. The measure failed with 45.7% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 85", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_85_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2085%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2085%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1169, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1147|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1147|Statewide", "content_hash": "a84cf61426e14585", "measure_id": "CA1147", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 87", "description": "Alternative Energy. Research, Production, Incentives. Tax on California Oil. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.40000153, "percent_no": 54.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a tax on oil produced in California and used ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a tax on oil produced in California and used the revenue to fund alternative energy research, production incentives, and related programs. It sought to establish a constitutional amendment and statute creating this oil extraction tax to finance clean energy initiatives.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 87", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_87_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2087%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2087%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1168, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1146|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1146|Statewide", "content_hash": "d1c8b171afbc80da", "measure_id": "CA1146", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 82", "description": "Preschool Education. Tax on Incomes Over $400,000 for Individuals; $800,000 for Couples. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.09999847, "percent_no": 60.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a universal preschool program for four-ye...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a universal preschool program for four-year-olds in California, funded by a 1.7% tax on individual incomes over $400,000 and couple incomes over $800,000. The initiative would have created a new state department to oversee preschool services and established constitutional protections for the program's funding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 82", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_82_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2082%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2082%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1167, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1145|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1145|Statewide", "content_hash": "6c2ced8a38273f6a", "measure_id": "CA1145", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 89", "description": "Political Campaigns. Public Financing. Corporate Tax Increase. Contribution and Expenditure Limits. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 25.70000076, "percent_no": 74.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established public financing for state political camp...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established public financing for state political campaigns funded by increased corporate taxes, while imposing limits on campaign contributions and expenditures. It would have allowed candidates who agreed to spending limits and other requirements to receive public funds for their campaigns.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 89", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_89_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2089%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2089%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1166, "fingerprint": "2006|CA1144|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|CA1144|Statewide", "content_hash": "b93185823c19cc68", "measure_id": "CA1144", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 88", "description": "Education Funding. Real Property Parcel Tax. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 23.29999924, "percent_no": 76.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a $50 annual parcel tax on real property ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a $50 annual parcel tax on real property statewide to fund public education, requiring a constitutional amendment to override California's two-thirds voter approval requirement for local parcel taxes. The revenue would have been distributed to school districts based on enrollment and allocated for classroom instruction, teacher training, and educational programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 88", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_88_(2006)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2006/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2006", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2088%202006", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2088%202006", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 7962, "fingerprint": "2006|200600051|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600051|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "b2fa0f91ae633530", "measure_id": "200600051", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended to set minimum staffing levels and salaries for positions presently represented by the Tehama County Deputy Sheriff\u2019s Association?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5503, "no_votes": 7380, "total_votes": 12883, "percent_yes": 42.71520608553908, "percent_no": 57.28479391446092, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.572141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.510247", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended to set minimum staffing levels and salaries for positions presently represented by the Tehama County Deputy Sheriff\u2019s Association?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7964, "fingerprint": "2006|200600256|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600256|TRINITY", "content_hash": "16654982953751dd", "measure_id": "200600256", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide emergency room service, including a doctor on duty 24 hours a day, in accordance with  the terms and conditions of LAFCO Resolution No. 06-03 regarding formation of a district, with the powers granted by Health and Safety Code section 32121, and with a voter-elected Board of Directors, independent of the county, responsible for managing district operations and finances, in the described territory, shall formation of the local health care district known as Mountain Community Medical Services District be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3984, "no_votes": 1223, "total_votes": 5207, "percent_yes": 76.5123871711158, "percent_no": 23.487612828884195, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.572691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.510623", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide emergency room service, including a doctor on duty 24 hours a day, in accordance with  the terms and conditions of LAFCO Resolution No. 06-03 regarding formation of a district, with the powers granted by Health and Safety Code section 32121, and with a voter-elected Board of Directors, independent of the county, responsible for managing district operations and finances, in the described territory, shall formation of the local health care district known as Mountain Community Medical Services District be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7963, "fingerprint": "2006|200600255|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600255|TRINITY", "content_hash": "03f7d4b92982d602", "measure_id": "200600255", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide Trinity County residents access to basic emergency medical services, with a doctor on duty 24-hours a day, shall the Mountain Community Services District levy, for five years, an annual interim special parcel tax within its boundaries as follows: $32 per undeveloped parcel, $118 per improved nonresidential parcel, $118 per dwelling unit, in accordance with LAFCO resolution 06-03, and provide for guaranteed annual performance and financial accountability?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3904, "no_votes": 1313, "total_votes": 5217, "percent_yes": 74.83227908759824, "percent_no": 25.167720912401762, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.572411", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.510429", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide Trinity County residents access to basic emergency medical services, with a doctor on duty 24-hours a day, shall the Mountain Community Services District levy, for five years, an annual interim special parcel tax within its boundaries as follows: $32 per undeveloped parcel, $118 per improved nonresidential parcel, $118 per dwelling unit, in accordance with LAFCO resolution 06-03, and provide for guaranteed annual performance and financial accountability?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11722, "fingerprint": "2006|200600545|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600545|TULARE", "content_hash": "f5573cee63624103", "measure_id": "200600545", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a permanent educational center in Hanford by acquiring, constructing and equipping buildings, sites, libraries, classrooms, science and computer labs, to prepare students for university transfer, skilled jobs, law enforcement, firefighting and vocational programs, shall the College of the Sequoias Hanford Campus Improvement District No.\u00a01 of the College of the Sequoias Community College District issue $22 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22, "no_votes": 49, "total_votes": 71, "percent_yes": 30.985915492957737, "percent_no": 69.01408450704227, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.568566", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.574391", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.511737", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a permanent educational center in Hanford by acquiring, constructing and equipping buildings, sites, libraries, classrooms, science and computer labs, to prepare students for university transfer, skilled jobs, law enforcement, firefighting and vocational programs, shall the College of the Sequoias Hanford Campus Improvement District No.\u00a01 of the College of the Sequoias Community College District issue $22 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual financial audits, no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7965, "fingerprint": "2006|200600180|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600180|TULARE", "content_hash": "7d5d4a95f7dbde76", "measure_id": "200600180", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District be authorized to construct a library media center at Reedley High, an Elementary School in Reedley, Orange Cove High music building, student support facilities including cafeterias/multipurpose buildings, make health and safety improvements, provide additional classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and qualify the District for $8,000,000 in State grants by issuing $32,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115, "no_votes": 130, "total_votes": 245, "percent_yes": 46.93877551020408, "percent_no": 53.06122448979592, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.572970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.510810", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District be authorized to construct a library media center at Reedley High, an Elementary School in Reedley, Orange Cove High music building, student support facilities including cafeterias/multipurpose buildings, make health and safety improvements, provide additional classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and qualify the District for $8,000,000 in State grants by issuing $32,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11723, "fingerprint": "2006|200600549|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600549|TULARE", "content_hash": "45d30a8d5f9ce265", "measure_id": "200600549", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District be authorized to construct a library media center at Reedley High School, an Elementary School in Reedley, Orange Cove High School music building, student support facilities including cafeterias/multipurpose buildings, make health and safety improvements, provide additional classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and qualify the District for $8,000,000 in State grants by issuing $32,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and NO money for administrator or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 166, "no_votes": 201, "total_votes": 367, "percent_yes": 45.23160762942779, "percent_no": 54.76839237057221, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.569775", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.575515", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.512493", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District be authorized to construct a library media center at Reedley High School, an Elementary School in Reedley, Orange Cove High School music building, student support facilities including cafeterias/multipurpose buildings, make health and safety improvements, provide additional classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and qualify the District for $8,000,000 in State grants by issuing $32,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, annual audits, and NO money for administrator or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7967, "fingerprint": "2006|200600182|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600182|TULARE", "content_hash": "8a2fba429499b6a5", "measure_id": "200600182", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including improvements to the Football Bowl, Old Gym, and softball fields; added parking; landscape beautification; upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields and school facilities; Little Theater upgrades and improvements; and other listed projects, shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and sell up to $9,900,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate, with an oversight committee, and no money going for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 256, "no_votes": 224, "total_votes": 480, "percent_yes": 53.333333333333336, "percent_no": 46.666666666666664, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.573508", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.511180", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including improvements to the Football Bowl, Old Gym, and softball fields; added parking; landscape beautification; upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields and school facilities; Little Theater upgrades and improvements; and other listed projects, shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and sell up to $9,900,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate, with an oversight committee, and no money going for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7968, "fingerprint": "2006|200600183|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600183|TULARE", "content_hash": "a00bba96551b9084", "measure_id": "200600183", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To avoid overcrowding of schools by constructing, acquiring, furnishing and equipping new classrooms and school facilities, to continue to renovate and repair aging schools, to match developer fees, and to help qualify for State matching funds, shall the Visalia Unified School District issue $41,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with accountability provided by citizens\u2019 oversight and independent audits, and with no funds used for administrator or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8821, "no_votes": 8272, "total_votes": 17093, "percent_yes": 51.605920552272856, "percent_no": 48.394079447727144, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.573845", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.511363", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid overcrowding of schools by constructing, acquiring, furnishing and equipping new classrooms and school facilities, to continue to renovate and repair aging schools, to match developer fees, and to help qualify for State matching funds, shall the Visalia Unified School District issue $41,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with accountability provided by citizens\u2019 oversight and independent audits, and with no funds used for administrator or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7966, "fingerprint": "2006|200600181|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600181|TULARE", "content_hash": "f6d343a4d642ea85", "measure_id": "200600181", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Kings River Union Elementary School District:  Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $850,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit to be used as a joint use match?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 163, "no_votes": 126, "total_votes": 289, "percent_yes": 56.40138408304498, "percent_no": 43.59861591695502, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.573241", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.510998", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Kings River Union Elementary School District:  Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $850,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit to be used as a joint use match?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7969, "fingerprint": "2006|200600257|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600257|TULARE", "content_hash": "cedae41fd9cbbd63", "measure_id": "200600257", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To Repair potholes, local streets/roads; improve highways, including 99, 65, 198, Tulare/Lindsay; improve school crossings/routes to protect children; expand elderly/disabled transit; reduce air pollution; qualify for matching state/federal funds; shall the Tulare County Transportation Authority enact a half-cent sales tax ordinance with guaranteed independent annual audits and citizens oversight which automatically expires in 30 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45205, "no_votes": 22039, "total_votes": 67244, "percent_yes": 67.2253286538576, "percent_no": 32.7746713461424, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.574114", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.511549", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To Repair potholes, local streets/roads; improve highways, including 99, 65, 198, Tulare/Lindsay; improve school crossings/routes to protect children; expand elderly/disabled transit; reduce air pollution; qualify for matching state/federal funds; shall the Tulare County Transportation Authority enact a half-cent sales tax ordinance with guaranteed independent annual audits and citizens oversight which automatically expires in 30 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7970, "fingerprint": "2006|200600546|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600546|TULARE", "content_hash": "efd765f87b3c57a9", "measure_id": "200600546", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, arts, music, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $100 per parcel for 10 years so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 694, "no_votes": 496, "total_votes": 1190, "percent_yes": 58.31932773109244, "percent_no": 41.68067226890756, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.574676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.511931", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To develop a recreation department within the Cutler-Orosi area to promote youth activities including sports, arts, music, and other experiences that develop young people into active, responsible citizens, shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District levy a tax of $100 per parcel for 10 years so long as the Cutler-Orosi School Board oversees the program?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7971, "fingerprint": "2006|200600547|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600547|TULARE", "content_hash": "3b79030fec64c43b", "measure_id": "200600547", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms, restrooms and schools, making repairs and improvements to schools throughout the District including science labs, roofing and electrical upgrades, and making the District eligible for approximately $16,000,000 in State matching funds, shall Dinuba Unified School District issue $37,000,000 of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates provided spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and no money is used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2201, "no_votes": 1081, "total_votes": 3282, "percent_yes": 67.06276660572821, "percent_no": 32.937233394271786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.574950", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.512113", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms, restrooms and schools, making repairs and improvements to schools throughout the District including science labs, roofing and electrical upgrades, and making the District eligible for approximately $16,000,000 in State matching funds, shall Dinuba Unified School District issue $37,000,000 of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates provided spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and no money is used for administrative salaries or taken by the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7972, "fingerprint": "2006|200600548|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600548|TULARE", "content_hash": "636e293229b41d04", "measure_id": "200600548", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Exeter Union High School District repair and replace deteriorating roofs, upgrade aging electrical systems, classrooms and school facilities to meet current standards, make emergency structural repairs as necessary, add class rooms, and qualify for $3.7 million in State bond funds, by issuing $5,100,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, public oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2486, "no_votes": 1445, "total_votes": 3931, "percent_yes": 63.24090562197914, "percent_no": 36.75909437802086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.575227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.512301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Exeter Union High School District repair and replace deteriorating roofs, upgrade aging electrical systems, classrooms and school facilities to meet current standards, make emergency structural repairs as necessary, add class rooms, and qualify for $3.7 million in State bond funds, by issuing $5,100,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, public oversight, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7973, "fingerprint": "2006|200600550|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600550|TULARE", "content_hash": "ddc50bc0d16a8e64", "measure_id": "200600550", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To finance the construction, equipping and furnishing of a new gymnasium/performing arts center and related facilities, shall Tipton Elementary School District issue $2,800,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with mandatory performance and financial audits and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 174, "no_votes": 191, "total_votes": 365, "percent_yes": 47.67123287671232, "percent_no": 52.32876712328768, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.575796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.512702", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance the construction, equipping and furnishing of a new gymnasium/performing arts center and related facilities, shall Tipton Elementary School District issue $2,800,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with mandatory performance and financial audits and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7974, "fingerprint": "2006|200600052|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600052|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "90bdbf77d118c1eb", "measure_id": "200600052", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance Number 2683, adding Chapter 3.29 to the Tuolumne County Ordinance Code, imposing a special purpose retail transactions and use tax at a rate of .50% to be allocated one-half (1/2) to the Fire Department and one-half (1/2) to the Sheriff and Probation Departments to be used to strengthen local fire services, sheriffs patrol, and emergency services, adding firefighters, deputy sheriffs, and probation officers, replacing aging fire engines, equipment, and improving fire stations, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7056, "no_votes": 8336, "total_votes": 15392, "percent_yes": 45.84199584199584, "percent_no": 54.15800415800416, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.576119", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.512884", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance Number 2683, adding Chapter 3.29 to the Tuolumne County Ordinance Code, imposing a special purpose retail transactions and use tax at a rate of .50% to be allocated one-half (1/2) to the Fire Department and one-half (1/2) to the Sheriff and Probation Departments to be used to strengthen local fire services, sheriffs patrol, and emergency services, adding firefighters, deputy sheriffs, and probation officers, replacing aging fire engines, equipment, and improving fire stations, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 7980, "fingerprint": "2006|200600189|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600189|VENTURA", "content_hash": "9e5ac9ea9f6bb2d4", "measure_id": "200600189", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Eve Acosta be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1141, "no_votes": 501, "total_votes": 1642, "percent_yes": 69.4884287454324, "percent_no": 30.5115712545676, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-08-22", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.577825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.514010", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Eve Acosta be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7981, "fingerprint": "2006|200600190|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600190|VENTURA", "content_hash": "a9240c68a8fde76e", "measure_id": "200600190", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Ken Ortega be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1117, "no_votes": 522, "total_votes": 1639, "percent_yes": 68.15131177547285, "percent_no": 31.84868822452715, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-08-22", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.578103", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.514192", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ken Ortega be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7982, "fingerprint": "2006|200600191|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600191|VENTURA", "content_hash": "ecfbf5353c671274", "measure_id": "200600191", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Simon Ayala be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1138, "no_votes": 501, "total_votes": 1639, "percent_yes": 69.43258084197682, "percent_no": 30.567419158023185, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-08-22", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.578365", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.514450", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Simon Ayala be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7978, "fingerprint": "2006|200600186|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600186|VENTURA", "content_hash": "c352d48904c11828", "measure_id": "200600186", "measure_letter": "B6", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality Oak Park schools and provide safe, modern classrooms through new construction and repairs such as upgrading fire and security systems, reducing earthquake dangers, replacing aging roofs, updating science labs, replacing aging portables with permanent classrooms, and to improve the likelihood of qualifying for state matching funds, shall Oak Park Unified School District issue $89 million in bonds at lawful interest rates for improvement of school buildings and grounds, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2032, "no_votes": 1357, "total_votes": 3389, "percent_yes": 59.95868987902036, "percent_no": 40.04131012097964, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.577221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.513640", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality Oak Park schools and provide safe, modern classrooms through new construction and repairs such as upgrading fire and security systems, reducing earthquake dangers, replacing aging roofs, updating science labs, replacing aging portables with permanent classrooms, and to improve the likelihood of qualifying for state matching funds, shall Oak Park Unified School District issue $89 million in bonds at lawful interest rates for improvement of school buildings and grounds, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7979, "fingerprint": "2006|200600187|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600187|VENTURA", "content_hash": "d3444eb3baaca598", "measure_id": "200600187", "measure_letter": "C6", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety, replace aging school equipment and furnishings, and provide up-to-date educational technology, including updating science and computer lab equipment, replacing aging student desks and chairs, upgrading playground equipment to current safety standards, acquiring safe student transportation and maintenance vehicles, shall Oak Park Unified School District issue $17.5 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with mandatory audits and independent citizens\u2019 oversight of bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2030, "no_votes": 1348, "total_votes": 3378, "percent_yes": 60.094730609828304, "percent_no": 39.905269390171696, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.577554", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.513822", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety, replace aging school equipment and furnishings, and provide up-to-date educational technology, including updating science and computer lab equipment, replacing aging student desks and chairs, upgrading playground equipment to current safety standards, acquiring safe student transportation and maintenance vehicles, shall Oak Park Unified School District issue $17.5 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with mandatory audits and independent citizens\u2019 oversight of bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7975, "fingerprint": "2006|200600091|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600091|VENTURA", "content_hash": "07ecaaf502d5ca3b", "measure_id": "200600091", "measure_letter": "E6", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance entitled the \u201cFagan Canyon Project Approval Initiative\u201d be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2467, "no_votes": 2736, "total_votes": 5203, "percent_yes": 47.41495291178166, "percent_no": 52.58504708821834, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.576398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.513070", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance entitled the \u201cFagan Canyon Project Approval Initiative\u201d be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7977, "fingerprint": "2006|200600185|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600185|VENTURA", "content_hash": "9bc12a4ec68553a4", "measure_id": "200600185", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellent local schools, repair and upgrade outdated science and technology facilities, classrooms and restrooms, replace aging trailers with modern classrooms, improve fire, security, and emergency systems, update computer and instructional technology, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District issue $128 million of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip our local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 222, "no_votes": 142, "total_votes": 364, "percent_yes": 60.98901098901099, "percent_no": 39.01098901098901, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.576952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.513445", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellent local schools, repair and upgrade outdated science and technology facilities, classrooms and restrooms, replace aging trailers with modern classrooms, improve fire, security, and emergency systems, update computer and instructional technology, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District issue $128 million of bonds at legal rates to renovate, acquire, construct, repair and equip our local neighborhood schools, sites and facilities, with required independent financial audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7986, "fingerprint": "2006|200600551|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600551|VENTURA", "content_hash": "144b93b1c8fe8596", "measure_id": "200600551", "measure_letter": "H6", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the quality of Oak Park schools, ensure student safety and qualify for state matching funds, shall Oak Park Unified School District fund school renovations, including remodeling outdated classrooms and science labs, repairing leaky roofs, improving earthquake and fire safety, and replacing aging portables with permanent classrooms, by issuing $71.1 million in bonds at legal interest rates for improvement and construction of school buildings and grounds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2786, "no_votes": 2272, "total_votes": 5058, "percent_yes": 55.08105970739423, "percent_no": 44.91894029260577, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.579487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.515194", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of Oak Park schools, ensure student safety and qualify for state matching funds, shall Oak Park Unified School District fund school renovations, including remodeling outdated classrooms and science labs, repairing leaky roofs, improving earthquake and fire safety, and replacing aging portables with permanent classrooms, by issuing $71.1 million in bonds at legal interest rates for improvement and construction of school buildings and grounds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7976, "fingerprint": "2006|200600184|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600184|VENTURA", "content_hash": "8c8fb7a15e10190c", "measure_id": "200600184", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of programs at Allan Hancock College by: improving academic facilities to help students transfer to four-year colleges; improving job training facilities for police, firefighter, healthcare and other careers; upgrading aging buildings, classrooms & technology; and by upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Allan Hancock Joint Community College District issue $180,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, appoint a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6, "no_votes": 21, "total_votes": 27, "percent_yes": 22.22222222222222, "percent_no": 77.77777777777777, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.576675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.513256", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of programs at Allan Hancock College by: improving academic facilities to help students transfer to four-year colleges; improving job training facilities for police, firefighter, healthcare and other careers; upgrading aging buildings, classrooms & technology; and by upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Allan Hancock Joint Community College District issue $180,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, appoint a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7987, "fingerprint": "2006|200600552|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600552|VENTURA", "content_hash": "a0567bbe48ad5981", "measure_id": "200600552", "measure_letter": "J6", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Ocean View School District construct, renovate and replace classrooms and school facilities including drinking and plumbing water systems; improve access to computers and technology; replace portable classrooms with permanent classrooms and facilities; and make the District eligible for State matching funds by issuing $13,200,000 in bonds within legal interest rates with spending reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1571, "no_votes": 609, "total_votes": 2180, "percent_yes": 72.06422018348624, "percent_no": 27.935779816513758, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.579756", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.515375", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Ocean View School District construct, renovate and replace classrooms and school facilities including drinking and plumbing water systems; improve access to computers and technology; replace portable classrooms with permanent classrooms and facilities; and make the District eligible for State matching funds by issuing $13,200,000 in bonds within legal interest rates with spending reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7984, "fingerprint": "2006|200600444|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600444|VENTURA", "content_hash": "b72fc5d14d44976a", "measure_id": "200600444", "measure_letter": "K6", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance authorizing the Santa Paula Housing Authority to develop, construct or acquire in the City of Santa Paula, with federal or state financial assistance, low rent housing not to exceed in the aggregate 150 dwelling units for living accommodations for persons of low/very low income at sites yet to be determined and subject to all required discretionary city approvals be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2740, "no_votes": 2925, "total_votes": 5665, "percent_yes": 48.36716681376876, "percent_no": 51.63283318623124, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.578899", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.514824", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance authorizing the Santa Paula Housing Authority to develop, construct or acquire in the City of Santa Paula, with federal or state financial assistance, low rent housing not to exceed in the aggregate 150 dwelling units for living accommodations for persons of low/very low income at sites yet to be determined and subject to all required discretionary city approvals be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7985, "fingerprint": "2006|200600445|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600445|VENTURA", "content_hash": "b24c373ff6b5de9f", "measure_id": "200600445", "measure_letter": "L6", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the Santa Paula General Plan to generally require voter approval for residential or commercial development projects on 81 or more acres of land be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3529, "no_votes": 2201, "total_votes": 5730, "percent_yes": 61.588132635253054, "percent_no": 38.411867364746946, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.579219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.515004", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the Santa Paula General Plan to generally require voter approval for residential or commercial development projects on 81 or more acres of land be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7988, "fingerprint": "2006|200600553|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600553|VENTURA", "content_hash": "9ad06de296207888", "measure_id": "200600553", "measure_letter": "M6", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace portable classrooms, relieve student overcrowding by building and equipping new classrooms and educational facilities and repairing and equipping existing classrooms and educational facilities throughout the District, shall Oxnard School District issue $64,000,000 of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12655, "no_votes": 6976, "total_votes": 19631, "percent_yes": 64.4643675818858, "percent_no": 35.535632418114204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.580022", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.515558", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace portable classrooms, relieve student overcrowding by building and equipping new classrooms and educational facilities and repairing and equipping existing classrooms and educational facilities throughout the District, shall Oxnard School District issue $64,000,000 of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and cannot be transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7983, "fingerprint": "2006|200600443|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600443|VENTURA", "content_hash": "cbe505bd6c981866", "measure_id": "200600443", "measure_letter": "P6", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to prevent gang/drug related crimes; expand drug prevention programs; reduce child abuse, domestic violence; improve 9-1-1 emergency medical response times; purchase paramedic equipment; provide infrastructure; prepare for earthquakes/other emergencies by training, equipping, hiring police officers/firefighters/paramedics by increasing the sales/use tax by one-quarter percent with citizens' oversight, independent financial audits, expiring after 10 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21208, "no_votes": 13024, "total_votes": 34232, "percent_yes": 61.95372750642674, "percent_no": 38.04627249357326, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.578632", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.514639", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to prevent gang/drug related crimes; expand drug prevention programs; reduce child abuse, domestic violence; improve 9-1-1 emergency medical response times; purchase paramedic equipment; provide infrastructure; prepare for earthquakes/other emergencies by training, equipping, hiring police officers/firefighters/paramedics by increasing the sales/use tax by one-quarter percent with citizens' oversight, independent financial audits, expiring after 10 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7990, "fingerprint": "2006|200600093|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600093|YOLO", "content_hash": "4605813ab5c44c74", "measure_id": "200600093", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance establishing a permanent Urban Limit Line for the City of Woodland, to permanently circumscribe urban development and preserve surrounding agricultural lands, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5323, "no_votes": 4587, "total_votes": 9910, "percent_yes": 53.71342078708376, "percent_no": 46.28657921291624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.580613", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.515919", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance establishing a permanent Urban Limit Line for the City of Woodland, to permanently circumscribe urban development and preserve surrounding agricultural lands, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7991, "fingerprint": "2006|200600094|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600094|YOLO", "content_hash": "3a41e6dd665b0d16", "measure_id": "200600094", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland fund road rehabilitation in the minimum amount of $30.2 million and not less than 45% of the sales tax received?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6357, "no_votes": 3160, "total_votes": 9517, "percent_yes": 66.79625932541768, "percent_no": 33.20374067458232, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.580877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.516099", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland fund road rehabilitation in the minimum amount of $30.2 million and not less than 45% of the sales tax received?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7992, "fingerprint": "2006|200600095|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600095|YOLO", "content_hash": "2d8a4865daf3b7c9", "measure_id": "200600095", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland fund Phase II of the Community and Senior Center, Sports Park and renovation and improvements of parks, recreation facilities and pools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6684, "no_votes": 2951, "total_votes": 9635, "percent_yes": 69.3720809548521, "percent_no": 30.627919045147905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.581140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.516278", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland fund Phase II of the Community and Senior Center, Sports Park and renovation and improvements of parks, recreation facilities and pools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7993, "fingerprint": "2006|200600096|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600096|YOLO", "content_hash": "ab0b59b96bdc8727", "measure_id": "200600096", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland fund expansion of the Woodland Library, City Hall and Opera House?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5094, "no_votes": 4445, "total_votes": 9539, "percent_yes": 53.40182409057553, "percent_no": 46.59817590942447, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.581405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.516458", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall any voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland fund expansion of the Woodland Library, City Hall and Opera House?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7994, "fingerprint": "2006|200600097|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600097|YOLO", "content_hash": "7152c054cc6792fe", "measure_id": "200600097", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Woodland City Council extend the current one-half cent sales tax for general City services, programs and facilities, with the following mandatory restrictions: - The sales tax will expire after twelve years, unless re-authorized by the voters. - A detailed spending plan and report will be presented to the public and published in newspapers.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6234, "no_votes": 3649, "total_votes": 9883, "percent_yes": 63.07801274916523, "percent_no": 36.92198725083477, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.581708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.516642", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Woodland City Council extend the current one-half cent sales tax for general City services, programs and facilities, with the following mandatory restrictions: - The sales tax will expire after twelve years, unless re-authorized by the voters. - A detailed spending plan and report will be presented to the public and published in newspapers.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7989, "fingerprint": "2006|200600092|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600092|YOLO", "content_hash": "edc9ef8f4fdb10a3", "measure_id": "200600092", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2243, which extends for six years the existing Parks Maintenance Tax of $49 per year on residential units and on non-residential units in amounts specified in the Ordinance, to fund maintenance of parks, street trees, green belts, bike paths, medians, public landscaping, urban wildlife and habitat, swimming pools, and recreational facilities be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10909, "no_votes": 4585, "total_votes": 15494, "percent_yes": 70.40789983219311, "percent_no": 29.59210016780689, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.580343", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.515739", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2243, which extends for six years the existing Parks Maintenance Tax of $49 per year on residential units and on non-residential units in amounts specified in the Ordinance, to fund maintenance of parks, street trees, green belts, bike paths, medians, public landscaping, urban wildlife and habitat, swimming pools, and recreational facilities be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7998, "fingerprint": "2006|200600555|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600555|YOLO", "content_hash": "addad9362ebd98d4", "measure_id": "200600555", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home; repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs; upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems; repair leaky roofs; improve disabled access; upgrade technology; repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10334, "no_votes": 6078, "total_votes": 16412, "percent_yes": 62.96612234950037, "percent_no": 37.03387765049963, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.582829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.517366", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home; repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs; upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems; repair leaky roofs; improve disabled access; upgrade technology; repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7995, "fingerprint": "2006|200600446|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600446|YOLO", "content_hash": "ec033578e81dbbe1", "measure_id": "200600446", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council's approval of Ordinance 2259, approving the Second Street Crossing Project, a retail development of approximately 183,000 square feet, including a General Merchandise Store of 137,000 square feet and other retail buildings totaling 46,000 square feet, including a General Plan Amendment (Ordinance 2259, Exhibit A, Specific Plan Amendment (Exhibit B), Rezone (Exhibit C), and Development Agreement (Exhibit D)) be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11761, "no_votes": 11087, "total_votes": 22848, "percent_yes": 51.4749649859944, "percent_no": 48.5250350140056, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.581973", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.516825", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council's approval of Ordinance 2259, approving the Second Street Crossing Project, a retail development of approximately 183,000 square feet, including a General Merchandise Store of 137,000 square feet and other retail buildings totaling 46,000 square feet, including a General Plan Amendment (Ordinance 2259, Exhibit A, Specific Plan Amendment (Exhibit B), Rezone (Exhibit C), and Development Agreement (Exhibit D)) be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7996, "fingerprint": "2006|200600447|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600447|YOLO", "content_hash": "9f51ec8a771c632a", "measure_id": "200600447", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Davis consider adopting choice voting, also known as instant runoff or preference voting, as the system to elect City Council members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11620, "no_votes": 9352, "total_votes": 20972, "percent_yes": 55.40720961281709, "percent_no": 44.59279038718291, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.582238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.517006", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City of Davis consider adopting choice voting, also known as instant runoff or preference voting, as the system to elect City Council members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7997, "fingerprint": "2006|200600554|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600554|YOLO", "content_hash": "253a0c70806436c4", "measure_id": "200600554", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "(ADVISORY) Without authorizing any additional bonds or taxes, shall school bond Measure R passed by voters of Washington Unified School District on November 2, 1999, be amended so that a portion of those bond funds allocated for new construction at River City High School be reallocated for use at the new West Sacramento High School, which is to be constructed at the corner of Linden Road and Jefferson Boulevard?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6112, "no_votes": 3702, "total_votes": 9814, "percent_yes": 62.27837782759323, "percent_no": 37.72162217240677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.582504", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.517186", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Without authorizing any additional bonds or taxes, shall school bond Measure R passed by voters of Washington Unified School District on November 2, 1999, be amended so that a portion of those bond funds allocated for new construction at River City High School be reallocated for use at the new West Sacramento High School, which is to be constructed at the corner of Linden Road and Jefferson Boulevard?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 7999, "fingerprint": "2006|200600188|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600188|YUBA", "content_hash": "da46a2e4611d6904", "measure_id": "200600188", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by repairing and modernizing worn-out local schools, such as repairing, upgrading or replacing roofs, heating/air conditioning and plumbing systems; constructing, acquiring, converting, furnishing and equipping school facilities; and to help qualify for State modernization and construction matching funds, shall the Marysville Joint Unified School district issue $37,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4966, "no_votes": 3677, "total_votes": 8643, "percent_yes": 57.45690153881754, "percent_no": 42.54309846118246, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.583105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.517548", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by repairing and modernizing worn-out local schools, such as repairing, upgrading or replacing roofs, heating/air conditioning and plumbing systems; constructing, acquiring, converting, furnishing and equipping school facilities; and to help qualify for State modernization and construction matching funds, shall the Marysville Joint Unified School district issue $37,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizens\u2019 oversight, independent audits, and no money for administrators\u2019 salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8003, "fingerprint": "2006|200600556|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600556|YUBA", "content_hash": "d97265f72762998a", "measure_id": "200600556", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7224, "no_votes": 6347, "total_votes": 13571, "percent_yes": 53.231154668042144, "percent_no": 46.768845331957856, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.584233", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.518305", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade Yuba and Woodland Community Colleges, improve job training, university transfer, provide more courses to students close to home, repair/expand classrooms for math, science, healthcare, nursing, police, fire, public safety programs, upgrade electrical, heating, ventilation systems, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, upgrade technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip buildings, classrooms, sites, computer labs, shall Yuba Community College District issue $190 million in bonds, at legal rates, with mandatory audits and citizen oversight to monitor spending?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8000, "fingerprint": "2006|200600448|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600448|YUBA", "content_hash": "e583bfc0c8e8ace5", "measure_id": "200600448", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Marysville be amended, effective January 1, 2007, to revise when vacancies in elective office occur and when ordinances take effect, establish that department heads shall be appointed by the city manager, provide that the mayor and city council members shall be compensated in the same manner as council members in general law cities are, make clerical changes, and eliminate obsolete or redundant provisions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1213, "no_votes": 1207, "total_votes": 2420, "percent_yes": 50.12396694214876, "percent_no": 49.87603305785124, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.583373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.517750", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Marysville be amended, effective January 1, 2007, to revise when vacancies in elective office occur and when ordinances take effect, establish that department heads shall be appointed by the city manager, provide that the mayor and city council members shall be compensated in the same manner as council members in general law cities are, make clerical changes, and eliminate obsolete or redundant provisions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8001, "fingerprint": "2006|200600449|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600449|YUBA", "content_hash": "cb0c7f741080d212", "measure_id": "200600449", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "City of Wheatland Measure Concerning Appointive City Clerk and City Treasurer.\u00a0 Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 459, "no_votes": 414, "total_votes": 873, "percent_yes": 52.57731958762887, "percent_no": 47.42268041237113, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.583641", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.517931", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Wheatland Measure Concerning Appointive City Clerk and City Treasurer.\u00a0 Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8002, "fingerprint": "2006|200600450|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2006|200600450|YUBA", "content_hash": "9402524e52bfe72f", "measure_id": "200600450", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2006, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "City of Wheatland Transient Occupancy Tax.\u00a0 Shall City of Wheatland Ordinance No. 396 be adopted to levy a ten percent transient occupancy tax charged to guests of hotels, motels and similar structures intended for occupancy by transients?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 572, "no_votes": 301, "total_votes": 873, "percent_yes": 65.52119129438717, "percent_no": 34.478808705612835, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2006-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.583965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.518116", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Wheatland Transient Occupancy Tax.\u00a0 Shall City of Wheatland Ordinance No. 396 be adopted to levy a ten percent transient occupancy tax charged to guests of hotels, motels and similar structures intended for occupancy by transients?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11725, "fingerprint": "2005|200500234|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500234|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "85c5e1f6d30ef7b4", "measure_id": "200500234", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Albany Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax for seven years at the annual rate of $250.00 per residential unit and $.05 per square foot for non-residential parcels, exempting low income homeowners and renters and homeowners 65 and over, the proceeds of which shall be used to retain qualified staff with competitive compensation, add librarian and counselor positions, maintain small class sizes and safety supervision, and enhance extracurricular activities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4140, "no_votes": 1901, "total_votes": 6041, "percent_yes": 68.53170004966064, "percent_no": 31.468299950339357, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.581011", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.586728", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.519582", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Albany Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax for seven years at the annual rate of $250.00 per residential unit and $.05 per square foot for non-residential parcels, exempting low income homeowners and renters and homeowners 65 and over, the proceeds of which shall be used to retain qualified staff with competitive compensation, add librarian and counselor positions, maintain small class sizes and safety supervision, and enhance extracurricular activities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8004, "fingerprint": "2005|200500100|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500100|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e9050bd654bdaa88", "measure_id": "200500100", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the education in Alameda schools, retain experienced teachers and attract new qualified teachers, retain teaching specialists in reading, math and science, preserve educational programs in music and art and to maintain small class sizes, shall Alameda Unified School District replace its existing $109 parcel tax with a $189 yearly tax for seven years, providing for an exemption for senior citizens, no money for administrators, and with all money to benefit local Alameda schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8231, "no_votes": 4018, "total_votes": 12249, "percent_yes": 67.19732223038616, "percent_no": 32.80267776961384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.584533", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.518487", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the education in Alameda schools, retain experienced teachers and attract new qualified teachers, retain teaching specialists in reading, math and science, preserve educational programs in music and art and to maintain small class sizes, shall Alameda Unified School District replace its existing $109 parcel tax with a $189 yearly tax for seven years, providing for an exemption for senior citizens, no money for administrators, and with all money to benefit local Alameda schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11726, "fingerprint": "2005|200500235|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500235|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "253d0c43dc88bb0f", "measure_id": "200500235", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve school libraries, build new science labs and classrooms, update campus security systems, and continue the renovation, construction and modernization of classrooms, schools and other facilities described on the District's Project List, shall the Castro Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $44,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10602, "no_votes": 6072, "total_votes": 16674, "percent_yes": 63.584023029866856, "percent_no": 36.415976970133144, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.581357", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.587048", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.519764", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve school libraries, build new science labs and classrooms, update campus security systems, and continue the renovation, construction and modernization of classrooms, schools and other facilities described on the District's Project List, shall the Castro Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $44,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8005, "fingerprint": "2005|200500101|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500101|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d331ec0d37dda0dd", "measure_id": "200500101", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to provide funds for partial support for special academic instructional programs and services, smaller class sizes, technology, and maintenance services commensurate with an excellent educational program, shall the Piedmont City Unified School District be authorized to renew the levy of special taxes up to the amounts specified in the voter informational pamphlet for a period of four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4286, "no_votes": 579, "total_votes": 4865, "percent_yes": 88.09866392600205, "percent_no": 11.901336073997953, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.585219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.518670", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to provide funds for partial support for special academic instructional programs and services, smaller class sizes, technology, and maintenance services commensurate with an excellent educational program, shall the Piedmont City Unified School District be authorized to renew the levy of special taxes up to the amounts specified in the voter informational pamphlet for a period of four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11724, "fingerprint": "2005|200500158|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500158|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2acad9b433569e27", "measure_id": "200500158", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance establishing annual permitting requirements for large hotels within the City of Emeryville conditioned upon compliance with special employment regulations regarding payment of specified wages and health benefits to employees, workers retention and reinstatement rights, overtime rules, and employer paid leave for jury duty be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1245, "no_votes": 1051, "total_votes": 2296, "percent_yes": 54.224738675958186, "percent_no": 45.775261324041814, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.579977", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.585828", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.519037", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance establishing annual permitting requirements for large hotels within the City of Emeryville conditioned upon compliance with special employment regulations regarding payment of specified wages and health benefits to employees, workers retention and reinstatement rights, overtime rules, and employer paid leave for jury duty be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8006, "fingerprint": "2005|200500102|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500102|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "63fd618413efcfff", "measure_id": "200500102", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the quality of Piedmont's public education and to prevent further reductions in current special academic instructional programs including advanced placement, foreign language, fine arts, library and counseling services, technology upgrades and to continue to provide competitive compensation, professional training and curriculum improvements, shall the Piedmont City Unified School District be authorized to renew the levy of special taxes of up to the amounts specified in the voter pamphlet for a period of four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4037, "no_votes": 819, "total_votes": 4856, "percent_yes": 83.13426688632619, "percent_no": 16.865733113673812, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.585494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.518852", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of Piedmont's public education and to prevent further reductions in current special academic instructional programs including advanced placement, foreign language, fine arts, library and counseling services, technology upgrades and to continue to provide competitive compensation, professional training and curriculum improvements, shall the Piedmont City Unified School District be authorized to renew the levy of special taxes of up to the amounts specified in the voter pamphlet for a period of four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8007, "fingerprint": "2005|200500159|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500159|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "4b685228283eea65", "measure_id": "200500159", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the people of Livermore amend the Livermore General Plan concerning the North Livermore Urban Growth Boundary and other provisions to permit 2,450 units of residential development and related public facilities in North Livermore?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7663, "no_votes": 19678, "total_votes": 27341, "percent_yes": 28.0275044804506, "percent_no": 71.9724955195494, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.586155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.519221", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the people of Livermore amend the Livermore General Plan concerning the North Livermore Urban Growth Boundary and other provisions to permit 2,450 units of residential development and related public facilities in North Livermore?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8008, "fingerprint": "2005|200500160|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500160|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8b4200edcf6f3484", "measure_id": "200500160", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Livermore participate in the LAVWMA Export Pipeline Facilities Project to increase the City's wastewater disposal capacity to meet the current General Plan with the conditions that voters must approve future proposals that: (1) connect to the City sewer system any land brought inside the City's Urban Growth Boundary after November 1, 2005, that will have new urban uses after that date, or (2) change influent limits in the LAVWMA Agreement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18951, "no_votes": 6854, "total_votes": 25805, "percent_yes": 73.43925595814764, "percent_no": 26.56074404185236, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.586428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.519401", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Livermore participate in the LAVWMA Export Pipeline Facilities Project to increase the City's wastewater disposal capacity to meet the current General Plan with the conditions that voters must approve future proposals that: (1) connect to the City sewer system any land brought inside the City's Urban Growth Boundary after November 1, 2005, that will have new urban uses after that date, or (2) change influent limits in the LAVWMA Agreement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8009, "fingerprint": "2005|200500236|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500236|BUTTE", "content_hash": "3edc638698faa9b4", "measure_id": "200500236", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the abolishment of Trustee Areas in Durham Unified School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1007, "no_votes": 787, "total_votes": 1794, "percent_yes": 56.13154960981048, "percent_no": 43.86845039018952, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.587342", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.519944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the abolishment of Trustee Areas in Durham Unified School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11727, "fingerprint": "2005|200500119|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500119|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "7c4855e0babb75ef", "measure_id": "200500119", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 420 of the City of Angels authorizing the City Council to impose a special purpose transactions and use tax at a rate of .075% for the purpose of constructing a north and south arterial road be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 173, "no_votes": 1069, "total_votes": 1242, "percent_yes": 13.929146537842191, "percent_no": 86.07085346215781, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-08-30", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.582976", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.588480", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.520669", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 420 of the City of Angels authorizing the City Council to impose a special purpose transactions and use tax at a rate of .075% for the purpose of constructing a north and south arterial road be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8010, "fingerprint": "2005|200500112|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500112|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "c38d1be75affc7b7", "measure_id": "200500112", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 05-02 of the Appaloosa Community Services District, establishing a special tax for the following properties: $75.00 unimproved parcel, $75.00 improved parcel, for funding construction, opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing, and maintaining roads within the District, and for incidental construction and improvements of bridges, culverts, curbs, gutters, drains, and works, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73, "no_votes": 15, "total_votes": 88, "percent_yes": 82.95454545454545, "percent_no": 17.045454545454547, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.587615", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.520124", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 05-02 of the Appaloosa Community Services District, establishing a special tax for the following properties: $75.00 unimproved parcel, $75.00 improved parcel, for funding construction, opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing, and maintaining roads within the District, and for incidental construction and improvements of bridges, culverts, curbs, gutters, drains, and works, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8011, "fingerprint": "2005|200500113|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500113|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "00cc3914983ade16", "measure_id": "200500113", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the Appaloosa Road Community Services District issue revenue bonds in order to borrow money in an amount not to exceed Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) to be repaid with assessment revenues over a period not to exceed 15 years with an annual interest rate not to exceed six and one-quarter percent (6 1/4%) for purposes of District road improvements and maintenance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 74, "no_votes": 14, "total_votes": 88, "percent_yes": 84.0909090909091, "percent_no": 15.909090909090907, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.587883", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.520304", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Appaloosa Road Community Services District issue revenue bonds in order to borrow money in an amount not to exceed Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) to be repaid with assessment revenues over a period not to exceed 15 years with an annual interest rate not to exceed six and one-quarter percent (6 1/4%) for purposes of District road improvements and maintenance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8012, "fingerprint": "2005|200500114|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500114|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "62df2e845d32e972", "measure_id": "200500114", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 05-06 of the Appaloosa Community Services District, establishing a special tax for the Buckskin Zone in the amount of $250.00 on unimproved parcel and  $250.00 on improved parcel, for funding for opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing, and maintaining roads within the District, and for incidental construction and improvements of bridges, culverts, curbs, gutters, drains, and works, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 12, "percent_yes": 83.33333333333334, "percent_no": 16.666666666666657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.588149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.520484", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 05-06 of the Appaloosa Community Services District, establishing a special tax for the Buckskin Zone in the amount of $250.00 on unimproved parcel and  $250.00 on improved parcel, for funding for opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing, and maintaining roads within the District, and for incidental construction and improvements of bridges, culverts, curbs, gutters, drains, and works, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8014, "fingerprint": "2005|200500034|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500034|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "eb2d3e930db0b6cc", "measure_id": "200500034", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To strengthen and restore classroom programs that provide local students with rigorous preparation in math, science, writing, history, computers, music, art and other subjects and address the negative impact of state budget cuts, shall the Acalanes Union High School District be authorized to replace its existing parcel tax with a new qualified special tax costing $189 per taxable parcel on July 1, 2005, for six years, offering a senior exemption and with expenditures monitored by a citizens' oversite committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25818, "no_votes": 8597, "total_votes": 34415, "percent_yes": 75.01961354060728, "percent_no": 24.98038645939272, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.589092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.521034", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To strengthen and restore classroom programs that provide local students with rigorous preparation in math, science, writing, history, computers, music, art and other subjects and address the negative impact of state budget cuts, shall the Acalanes Union High School District be authorized to replace its existing parcel tax with a new qualified special tax costing $189 per taxable parcel on July 1, 2005, for six years, offering a senior exemption and with expenditures monitored by a citizens' oversite committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8015, "fingerprint": "2005|200500035|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500035|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "c9eb703f281bde8a", "measure_id": "200500035", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student reading, writing, math, and science skills by recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers and staff, restore programs and positions lost due to budget cuts, and benefit local schools, shall the John Swett Unified School District levy an annual special tax of $70 per residential parcel and a tax on commercial property in the amounts described in the voter pamphlet, for 5 years, with annual audits, independent oversight, and an exemption for homeowners 65 or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9119, "no_votes": 3695, "total_votes": 12814, "percent_yes": 71.1643514905572, "percent_no": 28.835648509442805, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.589362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.521218", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student reading, writing, math, and science skills by recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers and staff, restore programs and positions lost due to budget cuts, and benefit local schools, shall the John Swett Unified School District levy an annual special tax of $70 per residential parcel and a tax on commercial property in the amounts described in the voter pamphlet, for 5 years, with annual audits, independent oversight, and an exemption for homeowners 65 or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8016, "fingerprint": "2005|200500103|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500103|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "c9eb703f281bde8a", "measure_id": "200500103", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student reading, writing, math, and science skills by recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers and staff, restore programs and positions lost due to budget cuts, and benefit local schools, shall the John Swett Unified School District levy an annual special tax of $70 per residential parcel and a tax on commercial property in the amounts described in the voter pamphlet, for 5 years, with annual audits, independent oversight, and an exemption for homeowners 65 or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1218, "no_votes": 679, "total_votes": 1897, "percent_yes": 64.20664206642066, "percent_no": 35.793357933579344, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.589633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.521405", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student reading, writing, math, and science skills by recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers and staff, restore programs and positions lost due to budget cuts, and benefit local schools, shall the John Swett Unified School District levy an annual special tax of $70 per residential parcel and a tax on commercial property in the amounts described in the voter pamphlet, for 5 years, with annual audits, independent oversight, and an exemption for homeowners 65 or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8017, "fingerprint": "2005|200500118|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500118|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "14daf88e3f2b4821", "measure_id": "200500118", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Contra Costa County Ordinance 2005-09 be approved to increase the existing parcel tax on County Service Area P-2 (Zone A), to annual maximums of $280 per parcel for residential property (single and multiple), $1,680 per parcel for commercial/ industrial/institutional property, and to $8,400 per parcel for commercial/theater property to provide funding to restore the level of police protection services to 4 officers within that area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1222, "no_votes": 601, "total_votes": 1823, "percent_yes": 67.03236423477784, "percent_no": 32.967635765222155, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-08-30", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.589962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.521592", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Contra Costa County Ordinance 2005-09 be approved to increase the existing parcel tax on County Service Area P-2 (Zone A), to annual maximums of $280 per parcel for residential property (single and multiple), $1,680 per parcel for commercial/ industrial/institutional property, and to $8,400 per parcel for commercial/theater property to provide funding to restore the level of police protection services to 4 officers within that area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8027, "fingerprint": "2005|200500237|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500237|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6e866d460374c9c6", "measure_id": "200500237", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue repairing all school facilities, improve classroom safety and technology, and relieve overcrowding shall the West Contra Costa Unified School District issue $400 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits and a citizen oversight committee to monitor that funds are spent accordingly, and upon receipt of a waiver of the District's statutory debt limit from the State Board of Education, if required?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30013, "no_votes": 22776, "total_votes": 52789, "percent_yes": 56.85464774858399, "percent_no": 43.14535225141601, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.595421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.523576", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue repairing all school facilities, improve classroom safety and technology, and relieve overcrowding shall the West Contra Costa Unified School District issue $400 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits and a citizen oversight committee to monitor that funds are spent accordingly, and upon receipt of a waiver of the District's statutory debt limit from the State Board of Education, if required?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8019, "fingerprint": "2005|200500161|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500161|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "61a200635b383438", "measure_id": "200500161", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the electors adopt the City of Antioch Growth Control, Traffic Relief, Voter-Approved Urban Limit Line, and Roddy Ranch Development General Plan Reduction Initiative Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12612, "no_votes": 8513, "total_votes": 21125, "percent_yes": 59.70177514792899, "percent_no": 40.29822485207101, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.590494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.521952", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the electors adopt the City of Antioch Growth Control, Traffic Relief, Voter-Approved Urban Limit Line, and Roddy Ranch Development General Plan Reduction Initiative Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8020, "fingerprint": "2005|200500162|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500162|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b0207b81c0793999", "measure_id": "200500162", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters approve the City of Brentwood Voter Approved Urban Limit Line measure, which would amend the City of Brentwood's General Plan by creating an Urban Limit Line to guide future growth and development in a manner consistent with the General Plan and should qualify the City of Brentwood to receive Measure J's \"return to source\" funds from the Contra Costa Transportation Authority for improvements to local streets and roads?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5151, "no_votes": 5314, "total_votes": 10465, "percent_yes": 49.22121356903965, "percent_no": 50.77878643096035, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.590761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.522135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters approve the City of Brentwood Voter Approved Urban Limit Line measure, which would amend the City of Brentwood's General Plan by creating an Urban Limit Line to guide future growth and development in a manner consistent with the General Plan and should qualify the City of Brentwood to receive Measure J's \"return to source\" funds from the Contra Costa Transportation Authority for improvements to local streets and roads?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8021, "fingerprint": "2005|200500163|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500163|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "9d3fdfee22bfcc8c", "measure_id": "200500163", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council be authorized to levy a special landscape tax for 15 years, issue no more than $2,800,000 in improvement bonds, and finance public services and facilities through Community Facilities District 2005-1 (replacing existing District 1997-1) in the initial annual amount of $365.00 per residential parcel and non-residential acre (subject to annual CPI increases), for public landscaping, weed abatement, trails, downtown park, fountain and related costs; and shall the District's first year appropriations limit be $1,616,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2084, "no_votes": 2541, "total_votes": 4625, "percent_yes": 45.05945945945946, "percent_no": 54.94054054054054, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.591158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.522318", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council be authorized to levy a special landscape tax for 15 years, issue no more than $2,800,000 in improvement bonds, and finance public services and facilities through Community Facilities District 2005-1 (replacing existing District 1997-1) in the initial annual amount of $365.00 per residential parcel and non-residential acre (subject to annual CPI increases), for public landscaping, weed abatement, trails, downtown park, fountain and related costs; and shall the District's first year appropriations limit be $1,616,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8022, "fingerprint": "2005|200500164|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500164|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2ecdeffffa3f33ab", "measure_id": "200500164", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4417, "no_votes": 5892, "total_votes": 10309, "percent_yes": 42.84605684353477, "percent_no": 57.15394315646523, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.591995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.522504", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8023, "fingerprint": "2005|200500165|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500165|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "200500165", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4319, "no_votes": 6016, "total_votes": 10335, "percent_yes": 41.79003386550556, "percent_no": 58.20996613449444, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.592626", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.522748", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8024, "fingerprint": "2005|200500166|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500166|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e117624a28df9bfe", "measure_id": "200500166", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the City of Pittsburg approve a proposal to amend the City General Plan and Zoning Map by: (1) establishing a voter-approved urban limit line, which could only be changed by a vote of the people; (2) prezoning certain lands outside the City limits; (3) adding a new General Plan goal; and (4) modifying other General Plan text and diagrams, as further described in the proposal?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5577, "no_votes": 5199, "total_votes": 10776, "percent_yes": 51.75389755011136, "percent_no": 48.24610244988864, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.593039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.523008", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the City of Pittsburg approve a proposal to amend the City General Plan and Zoning Map by: (1) establishing a voter-approved urban limit line, which could only be changed by a vote of the people; (2) prezoning certain lands outside the City limits; (3) adding a new General Plan goal; and (4) modifying other General Plan text and diagrams, as further described in the proposal?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8025, "fingerprint": "2005|200500167|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500167|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2920697cb60cc0c8", "measure_id": "200500167", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the City of Richmond Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance to increase the tax rate by one-half percent (1/2%) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6843, "no_votes": 12778, "total_votes": 19621, "percent_yes": 34.875898272259306, "percent_no": 65.1241017277407, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.593887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.523209", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the City of Richmond Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance to increase the tax rate by one-half percent (1/2%) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8026, "fingerprint": "2005|200500168|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500168|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "feb168c95cfafc06", "measure_id": "200500168", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To replace the outdated, undersized, worn out downtown library with a new library accessible to all, with adequate space for books and materials, children's reading programs, a computer, homework and tutoring center for local students, and the space and equipment to offer computer and Internet programs for adults and seniors, shall the City of Walnut Creek issue $21 million of bonds to build a new downtown library, adjoining plaza and parking for the new library and Civic Park?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16133, "no_votes": 10087, "total_votes": 26220, "percent_yes": 61.529366895499614, "percent_no": 38.470633104500386, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.594690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.523392", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace the outdated, undersized, worn out downtown library with a new library accessible to all, with adequate space for books and materials, children's reading programs, a computer, homework and tutoring center for local students, and the space and equipment to offer computer and Internet programs for adults and seniors, shall the City of Walnut Creek issue $21 million of bonds to build a new downtown library, adjoining plaza and parking for the new library and Civic Park?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8018, "fingerprint": "2005|200500127|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500127|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6844782ff499f516", "measure_id": "200500127", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area R-7A (Alamo Parks and Recreation) be increased to $990,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the Fiscal Years 2006/2007 through 2009/2010 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3383, "no_votes": 1643, "total_votes": 5026, "percent_yes": 67.3099880620772, "percent_no": 32.690011937922804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.590230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.521772", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area R-7A (Alamo Parks and Recreation) be increased to $990,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the Fiscal Years 2006/2007 through 2009/2010 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8013, "fingerprint": "2005|200500003|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500003|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "a56e5386ec583f56", "measure_id": "200500003", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Knightsen Town Community Services District be formed upon as affirmative vote by two-thirds of the voters and become effective July 1, 2005 and include the territory shown in Exhibit A of the Board of Supervisors Resolution and be authorized to levy up to a $200 annual tax for developed parcels and up to a $100 annual tax for undeveloped parcels for the purpose of constructing, operating, maintaining, and servicing flood control and water quality improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 329, "no_votes": 117, "total_votes": 446, "percent_yes": 73.76681614349776, "percent_no": 26.233183856502237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-02-15", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.588792", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.520853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Knightsen Town Community Services District be formed upon as affirmative vote by two-thirds of the voters and become effective July 1, 2005 and include the territory shown in Exhibit A of the Board of Supervisors Resolution and be authorized to levy up to a $200 annual tax for developed parcels and up to a $100 annual tax for undeveloped parcels for the purpose of constructing, operating, maintaining, and servicing flood control and water quality improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8035, "fingerprint": "2005|200500036|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500036|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "4ae1a45f317b7de7", "measure_id": "200500036", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District continue to collect $98/year per taxable parcel for seven years, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older for classroom supplies, materials, lower 4th - 8th grade class size, increased core academic class offerings in middle and high schools, vocational education, music, computers, technology support, physical education, playground and field maintenance, nursing, bus replacement fund, elementary school counseling and librarians?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 189, "no_votes": 84, "total_votes": 273, "percent_yes": 69.23076923076923, "percent_no": 30.769230769230774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.598634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.525090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District continue to collect $98/year per taxable parcel for seven years, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older for classroom supplies, materials, lower 4th - 8th grade class size, increased core academic class offerings in middle and high schools, vocational education, music, computers, technology support, physical education, playground and field maintenance, nursing, bus replacement fund, elementary school counseling and librarians?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8033, "fingerprint": "2005|200500014|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500014|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "84ce8d01352aa833", "measure_id": "200500014", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the resolution adopting a general plan for El Dorado County, entitled \"Resolution No. 235-2004 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of El Dorado Adopting the El Dorado County 2004 General Plan; a Plan for Managed Growth and Open Roads; a Plan for Quality Neighborhoods and Traffic Relief,\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23415, "no_votes": 22554, "total_votes": 45969, "percent_yes": 50.9365006852444, "percent_no": 49.0634993147556, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.598027", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.524714", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the resolution adopting a general plan for El Dorado County, entitled \"Resolution No. 235-2004 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of El Dorado Adopting the El Dorado County 2004 General Plan; a Plan for Managed Growth and Open Roads; a Plan for Quality Neighborhoods and Traffic Relief,\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8028, "fingerprint": "2005|200500009|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500009|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "c65b33e6556595e4", "measure_id": "200500009", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To construct and equip Cameron Park recreational community center, including meeting/classrooms, a youth activity area, facilities for senior meals and programs, recreational and competition pools, gym, exercise/dance room, assembly hall with a theater and stage for community productions, shall Cameron Park Community Services District issue $8,500,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to maintain financial accountability, prevent waste and ensure that no bond money is used for operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3504, "no_votes": 1612, "total_votes": 5116, "percent_yes": 68.49100860046912, "percent_no": 31.508991399530885, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.596104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.523762", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct and equip Cameron Park recreational community center, including meeting/classrooms, a youth activity area, facilities for senior meals and programs, recreational and competition pools, gym, exercise/dance room, assembly hall with a theater and stage for community productions, shall Cameron Park Community Services District issue $8,500,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to maintain financial accountability, prevent waste and ensure that no bond money is used for operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8034, "fingerprint": "2005|200500015|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500015|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "d89ebd41e1d45165", "measure_id": "200500015", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure D, which would amend the County Charter to add sections: (1) prohibiting the Board of Supervisors from adopting a general plan allowing traffic congestion on Highway 50 west of Placerville to reach level of service F during peak-hour commute periods at build-out using a specified basis for determining traffic capacity, and (2) requiring the Board to postpone approving single-family residential subdivisions of 3 or more parcels until Highway 50 is widened to 8 lanes between Cameron Park and the Sacramento County line, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18023, "no_votes": 27492, "total_votes": 45515, "percent_yes": 39.59793474678677, "percent_no": 60.40206525321323, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.598297", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.524908", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure D, which would amend the County Charter to add sections: (1) prohibiting the Board of Supervisors from adopting a general plan allowing traffic congestion on Highway 50 west of Placerville to reach level of service F during peak-hour commute periods at build-out using a specified basis for determining traffic capacity, and (2) requiring the Board to postpone approving single-family residential subdivisions of 3 or more parcels until Highway 50 is widened to 8 lanes between Cameron Park and the Sacramento County line, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8036, "fingerprint": "2005|200500081|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500081|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "7974b37d9802bdba", "measure_id": "200500081", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Cosumnes River Community Services District increase the special tax by $75.00 with a annual option by the Board of Directors to increase the Special Tax by $15.00 per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36, "no_votes": 46, "total_votes": 82, "percent_yes": 43.90243902439024, "percent_no": 56.09756097560976, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.598901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.525276", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Cosumnes River Community Services District increase the special tax by $75.00 with a annual option by the Board of Directors to increase the Special Tax by $15.00 per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8029, "fingerprint": "2005|200500010|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500010|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "7e3656f75481746f", "measure_id": "200500010", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain library services in the South Lake Tahoe Zone of benefit (Zone F) within county Service Area 10, shall a $15.00 per library special tax be imposed annually upon all parcels in the Zone to replace the expiring library assessments of $15, for the sole purpose of providing library service within such zone, commencing in 2005/2006 for a period of ten (10) years, and with annual adjustments not exceeding 3% annually or $5.00 for the life of the tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3615, "no_votes": 819, "total_votes": 4434, "percent_yes": 81.52909336941813, "percent_no": 18.470906630581865, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.596719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.523944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain library services in the South Lake Tahoe Zone of benefit (Zone F) within county Service Area 10, shall a $15.00 per library special tax be imposed annually upon all parcels in the Zone to replace the expiring library assessments of $15, for the sole purpose of providing library service within such zone, commencing in 2005/2006 for a period of ten (10) years, and with annual adjustments not exceeding 3% annually or $5.00 for the life of the tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8030, "fingerprint": "2005|200500011|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500011|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "273506f36e121cc9", "measure_id": "200500011", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain library services in the Georgetown Zone of Benefit (Zone G) within county Service Area 10, shall a $15.00 per library special tax be imposed annually upon all parcels in the Zone to replace the expiring library assessments of $12, for the sole purpose of providing library service within such zone, commencing in 2005/2006 for a period of ten (10) years, and with annual adjustments not exceeding 3% annually or $5.00 for the life of the tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1850, "no_votes": 732, "total_votes": 2582, "percent_yes": 71.64988381099923, "percent_no": 28.350116189000772, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.597138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.524123", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain library services in the Georgetown Zone of Benefit (Zone G) within county Service Area 10, shall a $15.00 per library special tax be imposed annually upon all parcels in the Zone to replace the expiring library assessments of $12, for the sole purpose of providing library service within such zone, commencing in 2005/2006 for a period of ten (10) years, and with annual adjustments not exceeding 3% annually or $5.00 for the life of the tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8031, "fingerprint": "2005|200500012|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500012|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "2e973904525033b9", "measure_id": "200500012", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain library services in the Placerville/Pollock Pines Zone of benefit (Zone H) within county Service Area 10, shall a $15.00 per library special tax be imposed annually upon all parcels in the Zone to replace the expiring library assessments of $12, for the sole purpose of providing library service within such zone, commencing in 2005/2006 for a period of ten (10) years, and with annual adjustments not exceeding 3% annually or $5.00 for the life of the tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14840, "no_votes": 7441, "total_votes": 22281, "percent_yes": 66.6038328620798, "percent_no": 33.3961671379202, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.597481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.524303", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain library services in the Placerville/Pollock Pines Zone of benefit (Zone H) within county Service Area 10, shall a $15.00 per library special tax be imposed annually upon all parcels in the Zone to replace the expiring library assessments of $12, for the sole purpose of providing library service within such zone, commencing in 2005/2006 for a period of ten (10) years, and with annual adjustments not exceeding 3% annually or $5.00 for the life of the tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8038, "fingerprint": "2005|200500083|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500083|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "081ae6041b7128fa", "measure_id": "200500083", "measure_letter": "I1", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Nashville Trail Community Service District raise yearly road repair fees from $200 to $300?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34, "no_votes": 11, "total_votes": 45, "percent_yes": 75.55555555555556, "percent_no": 24.444444444444443, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.599435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.525645", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Nashville Trail Community Service District raise yearly road repair fees from $200 to $300?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11728, "fingerprint": "2005|200500084|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500084|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "1ed1a719305297ae", "measure_id": "200500084", "measure_letter": "I2", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Presently, owners with two or more parcels of land do not pay the yearly assessment fee for more than one parcel so long as there are no dwellings on the additional parcels. Shall the Service district discontinue that dispensation and collect yearly fees for all parcels in the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 45, "percent_yes": 73.33333333333333, "percent_no": 26.66666666666667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.591986", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.599703", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.525829", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Presently, owners with two or more parcels of land do not pay the yearly assessment fee for more than one parcel so long as there are no dwellings on the additional parcels. Shall the Service district discontinue that dispensation and collect yearly fees for all parcels in the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11729, "fingerprint": "2005|200500085|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500085|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "3cac565362da5f52", "measure_id": "200500085", "measure_letter": "I3", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Service District raise yearly fees from $200 to $1000 for properties on which are housed businesses that impact road traffic and are classified and licensed by the County of El Dorado as: Wineries/Breweries (code 707), Riding stables (code 560)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 45, "percent_yes": 73.33333333333333, "percent_no": 26.66666666666667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.592217", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.599987", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.526009", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Service District raise yearly fees from $200 to $1000 for properties on which are housed businesses that impact road traffic and are classified and licensed by the County of El Dorado as: Wineries/Breweries (code 707), Riding stables (code 560)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8037, "fingerprint": "2005|200500082|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500082|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ca626e801d3a58e2", "measure_id": "200500082", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $600.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 2005/06 and continuing each year thereafter? Said tax is to be assessed and collected with the El Dorado County General Taxes commencing with the forthcoming 2005/06 fiscal year and continuing each year thereafter, and shall be used only for those purposes authorized by the zone of benefit under County Services Area law.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 66, "percent_yes": 59.09090909090909, "percent_no": 40.90909090909091, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.599170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.525462", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $600.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 2005/06 and continuing each year thereafter? Said tax is to be assessed and collected with the El Dorado County General Taxes commencing with the forthcoming 2005/06 fiscal year and continuing each year thereafter, and shall be used only for those purposes authorized by the zone of benefit under County Services Area law.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8041, "fingerprint": "2005|200500128|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500128|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "d312e6d3f91435a1", "measure_id": "200500128", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special tax be levied on real property within County Services Area 10, Zone H, to fund library services within Zone H, including the Placerville and Pollock Pines libraries, commencing in fiscal year 2006/2007 and expiring after 15 years, at annual rates (increasing by the Consumer Price Index up to 3% annually): $15 per parcel of improved property (excluding churches, cemeteries and schools), vacant residential property up to 2.5 acres, and vacant multi-residential property; $12 per residence for parcels with multiple residences (excluding time shares); $7.50 per mobile home for mobile home parks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16005, "no_votes": 12603, "total_votes": 28608, "percent_yes": 55.945889261744966, "percent_no": 44.054110738255034, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.601045", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.526584", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax be levied on real property within County Services Area 10, Zone H, to fund library services within Zone H, including the Placerville and Pollock Pines libraries, commencing in fiscal year 2006/2007 and expiring after 15 years, at annual rates (increasing by the Consumer Price Index up to 3% annually): $15 per parcel of improved property (excluding churches, cemeteries and schools), vacant residential property up to 2.5 acres, and vacant multi-residential property; $12 per residence for parcels with multiple residences (excluding time shares); $7.50 per mobile home for mobile home parks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8032, "fingerprint": "2005|200500013|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500013|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "cc874a2cbcf3212d", "measure_id": "200500013", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax of $5.00 be levied per parcel of real property within County Services Area Number 7 (west slope of El Dorado County), to be assessed and collected with, other property taxes commencing with fiscal year 2005/2006, provided the special tax may be adjusted annually by the California Consumer Price Index at the beginning of each fiscal year, beginning on July 1, 2006, and that the proceeds from the special tax shall be used only for mosquito abatement services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22345, "no_votes": 17794, "total_votes": 40139, "percent_yes": 55.66905005107253, "percent_no": 44.33094994892747, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.597757", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.524485", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax of $5.00 be levied per parcel of real property within County Services Area Number 7 (west slope of El Dorado County), to be assessed and collected with, other property taxes commencing with fiscal year 2005/2006, provided the special tax may be adjusted annually by the California Consumer Price Index at the beginning of each fiscal year, beginning on July 1, 2006, and that the proceeds from the special tax shall be used only for mosquito abatement services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8040, "fingerprint": "2005|200500117|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500117|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "3fa4ee657ed5c26d", "measure_id": "200500117", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the special tax of the West El Largo Community Services District be established at $150 per unimproved and $300 per improved parcel to provide funds for road maintenance and repaving, and liability insurance for the West El Largo Community Service District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 20, "percent_yes": 85.0, "percent_no": 15.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-08-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.600520", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.526372", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the special tax of the West El Largo Community Services District be established at $150 per unimproved and $300 per improved parcel to provide funds for road maintenance and repaving, and liability insurance for the West El Largo Community Service District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8039, "fingerprint": "2005|200500116|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500116|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a0cec16544847245", "measure_id": "200500116", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Rising Hill Road Community Service District increase the Special Tax by $100.00 with three year annual option by the Board of Directors to increase the Special Tax by $50.00 per year and in addition increase the District's spending limit in an amount equal to the increase in the special tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 112, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 139, "percent_yes": 80.57553956834532, "percent_no": 19.42446043165468, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-08-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.600255", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.526192", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Rising Hill Road Community Service District increase the Special Tax by $100.00 with three year annual option by the Board of Directors to increase the Special Tax by $50.00 per year and in addition increase the District's spending limit in an amount equal to the increase in the special tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8043, "fingerprint": "2005|200500169|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500169|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "d82ada7992f287b7", "measure_id": "200500169", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the resolution adopting on July 11, 2005, by the El Dorado Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the incorporation of the City of El Dorado Hills and further ordering dissolution and reorganization of the El Dorado Hills Community Services District, and detachment of the territory to be incorporated from County Service Area 9, to be confirmed, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5092, "no_votes": 6565, "total_votes": 11657, "percent_yes": 43.681907866517975, "percent_no": 56.318092133482025, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.601735", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.526952", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the resolution adopting on July 11, 2005, by the El Dorado Local Agency Formation Commission ordering the incorporation of the City of El Dorado Hills and further ordering dissolution and reorganization of the El Dorado Hills Community Services District, and detachment of the territory to be incorporated from County Service Area 9, to be confirmed, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8044, "fingerprint": "2005|200500170|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500170|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "2aee8219373b9162", "measure_id": "200500170", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of El Dorado Hills be elected in future elections at-large or by district? Select only one of the following methods: City Council members shall be elected in the At-Large (\"yes\" column) -OR- City Council members shall be elected in the future by District (\"no\" column)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6771, "no_votes": 3794, "total_votes": 10565, "percent_yes": 64.0889730241363, "percent_no": 35.911026975863706, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.602008", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.527131", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of El Dorado Hills be elected in future elections at-large or by district? Select only one of the following methods: City Council members shall be elected in the At-Large (\"yes\" column) -OR- City Council members shall be elected in the future by District (\"no\" column)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8045, "fingerprint": "2005|200500171|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500171|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "770ca0e0f01a54ae", "measure_id": "200500171", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the current $20.00 annual benefit assessment imposed to fund snow removal services within the City of South Lake Tahoe, be replaced by a $40.00 annual special tax upon all improved parcels, with specified exceptions, subject to an annual inflation adjustment not to exceed 3%, to be used exclusively for purchasing, operating and maintaining snow removal equipment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1518, "no_votes": 1810, "total_votes": 3328, "percent_yes": 45.61298076923077, "percent_no": 54.38701923076923, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.602279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.527315", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the current $20.00 annual benefit assessment imposed to fund snow removal services within the City of South Lake Tahoe, be replaced by a $40.00 annual special tax upon all improved parcels, with specified exceptions, subject to an annual inflation adjustment not to exceed 3%, to be used exclusively for purchasing, operating and maintaining snow removal equipment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8042, "fingerprint": "2005|200500129|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500129|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "971018e217507cde", "measure_id": "200500129", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the current $20.00 annual benefit assessment imposed to fund snow removal services within the County Service Area No. 3 be replaced by a $50.00 annual special tax upon all improved parcels, with specified exceptions, within the Zone commencing in the fiscal year 2006/2007, to be used exclusively for maintaining snow removal services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1386, "no_votes": 1243, "total_votes": 2629, "percent_yes": 52.71966527196653, "percent_no": 47.28033472803347, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.601453", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.526769", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the current $20.00 annual benefit assessment imposed to fund snow removal services within the County Service Area No. 3 be replaced by a $50.00 annual special tax upon all improved parcels, with specified exceptions, within the Zone commencing in the fiscal year 2006/2007, to be used exclusively for maintaining snow removal services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8046, "fingerprint": "2005|200500238|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500238|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "bd210c5a9ae1a902", "measure_id": "200500238", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Latrobe School District be authorized to upgrade Latrobe and Miller's Hill Schools by improving health, safety and handicapped access as required by state law, provide student access to computers and modern technology, improve playfields for students and community use and provide a cafeteria/multipurpose room at Latrobe School, by issuing $4,300,000 in bonds, within legal limits, with citizens' oversight committee, audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 586, "no_votes": 514, "total_votes": 1100, "percent_yes": 53.27272727272727, "percent_no": 46.72727272727273, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.602553", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.527498", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Latrobe School District be authorized to upgrade Latrobe and Miller's Hill Schools by improving health, safety and handicapped access as required by state law, provide student access to computers and modern technology, improve playfields for students and community use and provide a cafeteria/multipurpose room at Latrobe School, by issuing $4,300,000 in bonds, within legal limits, with citizens' oversight committee, audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8048, "fingerprint": "2005|200500240|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500240|FRESNO", "content_hash": "4ea268ac6d7b90f6", "measure_id": "200500240", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to meet the needs of student growth, expand campuses through construction of new buildings, provide continued access to education and technology, repair and upgrade existing facilities and furnish and equip buildings, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $36,000,000 in bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit of repair, improvements, construction and acquisition of classrooms and facilities with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2632, "no_votes": 2202, "total_votes": 4834, "percent_yes": 54.44766239139429, "percent_no": 45.55233760860571, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.603163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.527867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to meet the needs of student growth, expand campuses through construction of new buildings, provide continued access to education and technology, repair and upgrade existing facilities and furnish and equip buildings, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $36,000,000 in bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit of repair, improvements, construction and acquisition of classrooms and facilities with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8047, "fingerprint": "2005|200500239|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500239|FRESNO", "content_hash": "165e94958e5e9141", "measure_id": "200500239", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including Football Bowl upgrades and improvements; Old Gym upgrades and improvements; added parking; landscape beautification; softball field upgrades and improvements, upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields; and Little Theater upgrades and improvements, shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and sell up to $7,000,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2268, "no_votes": 1112, "total_votes": 3380, "percent_yes": 67.10059171597634, "percent_no": 32.899408284023664, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.602892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.527683", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including Football Bowl upgrades and improvements; Old Gym upgrades and improvements; added parking; landscape beautification; softball field upgrades and improvements, upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields; and Little Theater upgrades and improvements, shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and sell up to $7,000,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8049, "fingerprint": "2005|200500130|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500130|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "d8f6bee7bee1aaa9", "measure_id": "200500130", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should Manila Community Services District territory be included in the County of Humboldt's Redevelopment Zone, thereby diverting for 45 years a portion of the District future property tax revenues to finance the County's redevelopment projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120, "no_votes": 155, "total_votes": 275, "percent_yes": 43.636363636363626, "percent_no": 56.363636363636374, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.603432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.528051", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Manila Community Services District territory be included in the County of Humboldt's Redevelopment Zone, thereby diverting for 45 years a portion of the District future property tax revenues to finance the County's redevelopment projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8050, "fingerprint": "2005|200500131|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500131|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "6d9b1b2c012d9c19", "measure_id": "200500131", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should Redway Community Services District territory be included in the County of Humboldt's Redevelopment Zone, thereby diverting for 45 years a portion of the District future property tax revenues to finance the County's redevelopment projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55, "no_votes": 325, "total_votes": 380, "percent_yes": 14.473684210526311, "percent_no": 85.52631578947368, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.603701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.528233", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Redway Community Services District territory be included in the County of Humboldt's Redevelopment Zone, thereby diverting for 45 years a portion of the District future property tax revenues to finance the County's redevelopment projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8053, "fingerprint": "2005|200500104|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500104|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "bf997452d7075760", "measure_id": "200500104", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and relieve overcrowding, shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District construct schools, classrooms and schools facilities throughout the District, repair and update local schools including upgrading/installing fire safety equipment, plumbing/sewer/heating/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for technology, acquire school facilities currently leased, and qualify for State grants, by issuing $250,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, public oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 187, "no_votes": 143, "total_votes": 330, "percent_yes": 56.66666666666666, "percent_no": 43.33333333333334, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.604531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.528781", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and relieve overcrowding, shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District construct schools, classrooms and schools facilities throughout the District, repair and update local schools including upgrading/installing fire safety equipment, plumbing/sewer/heating/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for technology, acquire school facilities currently leased, and qualify for State grants, by issuing $250,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, public oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8051, "fingerprint": "2005|200500093|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500093|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "72e634b9ef5c9b50", "measure_id": "200500093", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2005-1-1 of the Salton Community Services District regarding the management and disposition of the Sewer Construction Fund be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 112, "no_votes": 111, "total_votes": 223, "percent_yes": 50.22421524663677, "percent_no": 49.77578475336323, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.603967", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.528415", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2005-1-1 of the Salton Community Services District regarding the management and disposition of the Sewer Construction Fund be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8052, "fingerprint": "2005|200500094|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500094|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "b877422dce970551", "measure_id": "200500094", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall Ordinance No. 1019 to give the City of Calexico the authority to negotiate an agreement with the Manzanita Band of the Kumeyaay Indians concerning development and operation of a gaming and entertainment resort within the City of Calexico be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2040, "no_votes": 1582, "total_votes": 3622, "percent_yes": 56.32247377139702, "percent_no": 43.67752622860298, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.604252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.528598", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall Ordinance No. 1019 to give the City of Calexico the authority to negotiate an agreement with the Manzanita Band of the Kumeyaay Indians concerning development and operation of a gaming and entertainment resort within the City of Calexico be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8055, "fingerprint": "2005|200500172|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500172|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "47d256990b4184ca", "measure_id": "200500172", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Brawley extend the collection of the four percent Utility User's Tax (established by Ordinance NUMBER 98-06), scheduled to expire June 1, 2008, upon the following utility services: defined telephone, electricity, gas, water, sewer, trash collection and cable television, in order to maintain city public services, including, but not limited to: police, fire emergency, administration, library, and parks and recreation; for a period of five years from the date currently set for expiration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1907, "no_votes": 1749, "total_votes": 3656, "percent_yes": 52.16083150984683, "percent_no": 47.83916849015317, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.605160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.529147", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Brawley extend the collection of the four percent Utility User's Tax (established by Ordinance NUMBER 98-06), scheduled to expire June 1, 2008, upon the following utility services: defined telephone, electricity, gas, water, sewer, trash collection and cable television, in order to maintain city public services, including, but not limited to: police, fire emergency, administration, library, and parks and recreation; for a period of five years from the date currently set for expiration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8054, "fingerprint": "2005|200500132|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500132|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "958b4ca63795d916", "measure_id": "200500132", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you support the placement of a new regional international airport in the County of Imperial to replace or augment those services provided by the San Diego International Airport?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15559, "no_votes": 4061, "total_votes": 19620, "percent_yes": 79.30173292558614, "percent_no": 20.698267074413863, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.604887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.528965", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you support the placement of a new regional international airport in the County of Imperial to replace or augment those services provided by the San Diego International Airport?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8056, "fingerprint": "2005|200500173|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500173|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "17bb00ad977d7118", "measure_id": "200500173", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1023, which extends the sunset clause for the Heffernan Memorial Hospital District half-cent sales tax for a period of 10 additional years, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2370, "no_votes": 934, "total_votes": 3304, "percent_yes": 71.73123486682809, "percent_no": 28.26876513317191, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.605433", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.529328", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1023, which extends the sunset clause for the Heffernan Memorial Hospital District half-cent sales tax for a period of 10 additional years, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8058, "fingerprint": "2005|200500241|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500241|INYO", "content_hash": "2a69ec3170428fa0", "measure_id": "200500241", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Owens Valley Unified School District upgrade and modernize old and outdated classrooms, replace deteriorating roofs, make health and safety improvements, upgrade inadequate electrical systems, improve student access to computers an modern technology, and construct a multipurpose room/cafeteria for school and community use by issuing $2,600,000 in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed 12%, with a citizen's' oversight committee, financial and performance audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 196, "no_votes": 152, "total_votes": 348, "percent_yes": 56.32183908045977, "percent_no": 43.67816091954023, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.605972", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.529689", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Owens Valley Unified School District upgrade and modernize old and outdated classrooms, replace deteriorating roofs, make health and safety improvements, upgrade inadequate electrical systems, improve student access to computers an modern technology, and construct a multipurpose room/cafeteria for school and community use by issuing $2,600,000 in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed 12%, with a citizen's' oversight committee, financial and performance audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8057, "fingerprint": "2005|200500037|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500037|INYO", "content_hash": "711352e43ac562ed", "measure_id": "200500037", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Big Pine Unified School District upgrade and modernize classrooms, replace roofs, improve health and safety, repair restrooms and plumbing, renovate electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, replace outdated portables with new classrooms, and qualify the District for over $500,000 in State-matching grants by issuing $2,200,000 in bonds at an interest rate not exceed 12%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 410, "no_votes": 190, "total_votes": 600, "percent_yes": 68.33333333333333, "percent_no": 31.66666666666667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.605703", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.529507", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Big Pine Unified School District upgrade and modernize classrooms, replace roofs, improve health and safety, repair restrooms and plumbing, renovate electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, replace outdated portables with new classrooms, and qualify the District for over $500,000 in State-matching grants by issuing $2,200,000 in bonds at an interest rate not exceed 12%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8063, "fingerprint": "2005|200500245|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500245|KERN", "content_hash": "68bc124d00e5ef02", "measure_id": "200500245", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Ken Rushing be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49, "no_votes": 42, "total_votes": 91, "percent_yes": 53.84615384615385, "percent_no": 46.15384615384615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.607415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.530599", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ken Rushing be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8061, "fingerprint": "2005|200500243|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500243|KERN", "content_hash": "f707416e49dae9c4", "measure_id": "200500243", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms and facilities throughout the District and to make the District eligible for State matching funds, shall the Delano Joint Union High School District issue $55 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and not transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2720, "no_votes": 1024, "total_votes": 3744, "percent_yes": 72.64957264957265, "percent_no": 27.350427350427353, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.606883", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.530236", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms and facilities throughout the District and to make the District eligible for State matching funds, shall the Delano Joint Union High School District issue $55 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and not transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8060, "fingerprint": "2005|200500242|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500242|KERN", "content_hash": "f3da14c15ca1c496", "measure_id": "200500242", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and renovate classrooms and schools throughout the District, relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms and make the District eligible for State matching funds, shall the Beardsley Elementary School District issue $8 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and not transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1771, "no_votes": 1017, "total_votes": 2788, "percent_yes": 63.52223816355811, "percent_no": 36.47776183644189, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.606614", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.530055", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and renovate classrooms and schools throughout the District, relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms and make the District eligible for State matching funds, shall the Beardsley Elementary School District issue $8 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and not transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8062, "fingerprint": "2005|200500244|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500244|KERN", "content_hash": "2068c538bfedfaac", "measure_id": "200500244", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve school overcrowding, improve school safety and provide facilities that best serve the students and community, shall the El Tejon Unified School District replace portable classrooms that are currently 57%, or 39 instructional classrooms, of the school district with equipped permanent classrooms, and build a multipurpose facility at Frazier Park Elementary School, construct and equip a new elementary school by issuing $7.120 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1209, "no_votes": 945, "total_votes": 2154, "percent_yes": 56.128133704735376, "percent_no": 43.871866295264624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.607150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.530416", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve school overcrowding, improve school safety and provide facilities that best serve the students and community, shall the El Tejon Unified School District replace portable classrooms that are currently 57%, or 39 instructional classrooms, of the school district with equipped permanent classrooms, and build a multipurpose facility at Frazier Park Elementary School, construct and equip a new elementary school by issuing $7.120 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8064, "fingerprint": "2005|200500246|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500246|KERN", "content_hash": "221ec80a0ef0cdd9", "measure_id": "200500246", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, repair and upgrade neighborhood schools, shall the Lost Hills Union Elementary School District construct, acquire, repair, furnish and equip classrooms, restrooms, sites and facilities, make health and safety improvements, upgrade plumbing, heating and cooling systems, and upgrade computer, electrical, and communication systems by issuing $6,200,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35, "no_votes": 23, "total_votes": 58, "percent_yes": 60.3448275862069, "percent_no": 39.6551724137931, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.607721", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.530781", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, repair and upgrade neighborhood schools, shall the Lost Hills Union Elementary School District construct, acquire, repair, furnish and equip classrooms, restrooms, sites and facilities, make health and safety improvements, upgrade plumbing, heating and cooling systems, and upgrade computer, electrical, and communication systems by issuing $6,200,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8059, "fingerprint": "2005|200500174|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500174|KERN", "content_hash": "eb3adfbf5a0131ad", "measure_id": "200500174", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be enacted in the City of Delano a temporary sales tax rate increase of one-half of one percent (0.50%) which will end after twenty (20) years, the proceeds of which shall be used for street and road improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1881, "no_votes": 1661, "total_votes": 3542, "percent_yes": 53.105590062111794, "percent_no": 46.894409937888206, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.606307", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.529873", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be enacted in the City of Delano a temporary sales tax rate increase of one-half of one percent (0.50%) which will end after twenty (20) years, the proceeds of which shall be used for street and road improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8067, "fingerprint": "2005|200500249|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500249|KINGS", "content_hash": "01e54eddaaef90bf", "measure_id": "200500249", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to meet the needs of student growth, expand campuses through construction of new buildings, provide continued access to education and technology, repair and upgrade existing facilities and furnish and equip buildings, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $36,000,000 in bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and facilities with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3084, "no_votes": 2653, "total_votes": 5737, "percent_yes": 53.75631863343211, "percent_no": 46.24368136656789, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.608701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.531326", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to meet the needs of student growth, expand campuses through construction of new buildings, provide continued access to education and technology, repair and upgrade existing facilities and furnish and equip buildings, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $36,000,000 in bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and facilities with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8065, "fingerprint": "2005|200500247|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500247|KINGS", "content_hash": "165e94958e5e9141", "measure_id": "200500247", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including Football Bowl upgrades and improvements; Old Gym upgrades and improvements; added parking; landscape beautification; softball field upgrades and improvements, upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields; and Little Theater upgrades and improvements, shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and sell up to $7,000,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 124, "no_votes": 99, "total_votes": 223, "percent_yes": 55.60538116591929, "percent_no": 44.39461883408071, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.608137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.530962", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including Football Bowl upgrades and improvements; Old Gym upgrades and improvements; added parking; landscape beautification; softball field upgrades and improvements, upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields; and Little Theater upgrades and improvements, shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and sell up to $7,000,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8066, "fingerprint": "2005|200500248|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500248|KINGS", "content_hash": "e3ac221362a71719", "measure_id": "200500248", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and meet the increasing enrollment needs; shall the Pioneer Union School District construct a new elementary school and be authorized to upgrade and construct classrooms and labs, upgrade outdated sewer and plumbing, make health and safety improvement and qualify the District to receive State-matching funds by issuing $7,500,000 in bonds with legal interest rates, no money for salaries, with review by the citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1524, "no_votes": 812, "total_votes": 2336, "percent_yes": 65.23972602739725, "percent_no": 34.76027397260275, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.608405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.531142", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and meet the increasing enrollment needs; shall the Pioneer Union School District construct a new elementary school and be authorized to upgrade and construct classrooms and labs, upgrade outdated sewer and plumbing, make health and safety improvement and qualify the District to receive State-matching funds by issuing $7,500,000 in bonds with legal interest rates, no money for salaries, with review by the citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8098, "fingerprint": "2005|200500111|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500111|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c04ee18973e82807", "measure_id": "200500111", "measure_letter": "05-A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the election of the Mayor be held on the first Tuesday in April starting in 2006?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1708, "no_votes": 2177, "total_votes": 3885, "percent_yes": 43.96396396396396, "percent_no": 56.03603603603604, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-14", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.620754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.540849", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the election of the Mayor be held on the first Tuesday in April starting in 2006?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11736, "fingerprint": "2005|200500057|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500057|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "30c84108a886d793", "measure_id": "200500057", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [1] Shall Article I, Section 2 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be added to provide for a gender neutrality clause and three other rules which establish the meaning of designated terms in the Charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11196, "no_votes": 4584, "total_votes": 15780, "percent_yes": 70.95057034220532, "percent_no": 29.049429657794676, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.607556", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.613477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.534437", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [1] Shall Article I, Section 2 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be added to provide for a gender neutrality clause and three other rules which establish the meaning of designated terms in the Charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8071, "fingerprint": "2005|200500022|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500022|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9c37b33768af408b", "measure_id": "200500022", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to authorize the City Council of the City of Los Angeles to include new Port Police officers in the same pension plan as new members of the Los Angeles Police Department (Fire and Police Pension Plan - Tier 5) and to give current Port Police Officers the choice of joining that Plan or staying in their current retirement plan, with all Port Police pension costs continuing to be paid by the Harbor Department?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 244808, "no_votes": 121238, "total_votes": 366046, "percent_yes": 66.8790261333275, "percent_no": 33.1209738666725, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.610633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.532605", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to authorize the City Council of the City of Los Angeles to include new Port Police officers in the same pension plan as new members of the Los Angeles Police Department (Fire and Police Pension Plan - Tier 5) and to give current Port Police Officers the choice of joining that Plan or staying in their current retirement plan, with all Port Police pension costs continuing to be paid by the Harbor Department?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8078, "fingerprint": "2005|200500058|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500058|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "15e5d137ead4a9ce", "measure_id": "200500058", "measure_letter": "10", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [10] Shall Article X, Sections 1 and 6, Article XI, Sections 6,7,14,17,20,21 and 22. and Article XXII, Section 1 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to change the obsolete title of the department of public services to the department of Glendale Water and Power and renumber the sections and change titles accordingly?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12883, "no_votes": 3794, "total_votes": 16677, "percent_yes": 77.25010493494034, "percent_no": 22.74989506505966, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.613810", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.534657", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [10] Shall Article X, Sections 1 and 6, Article XI, Sections 6,7,14,17,20,21 and 22. and Article XXII, Section 1 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to change the obsolete title of the department of public services to the department of Glendale Water and Power and renumber the sections and change titles accordingly?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8079, "fingerprint": "2005|200500059|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500059|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cf12a0ad69c48f8b", "measure_id": "200500059", "measure_letter": "11", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [11] Shall Article XI, Section 7 and Article XV, Section 2 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to change obsolete language regarding the \"official newspaper\" to the \"newspaper of general circulation?\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11663, "no_votes": 4850, "total_votes": 16513, "percent_yes": 70.6292012353903, "percent_no": 29.370798764609702, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.614081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.534912", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [11] Shall Article XI, Section 7 and Article XV, Section 2 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to change obsolete language regarding the \"official newspaper\" to the \"newspaper of general circulation?\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8080, "fingerprint": "2005|200500060|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500060|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "86d534cd1df622b2", "measure_id": "200500060", "measure_letter": "12", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [12] Shall obsolete language in Article XXII, Section 2 of the Charter of the City of Glendale regarding subordinate officers of the public service department be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11496, "no_votes": 4437, "total_votes": 15933, "percent_yes": 72.15213707399737, "percent_no": 27.847862926002634, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.614357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.535187", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [12] Shall obsolete language in Article XXII, Section 2 of the Charter of the City of Glendale regarding subordinate officers of the public service department be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8081, "fingerprint": "2005|200500061|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500061|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c4f5d5fb5380245e", "measure_id": "200500061", "measure_letter": "13", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [13] Shall Article XIII, Section of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to effectuate technical changes to remove obsolete language referring to reading rooms and also be amended to provide that library fines be paid into the general fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11261, "no_votes": 5138, "total_votes": 16399, "percent_yes": 68.66882126958961, "percent_no": 31.331178730410386, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.614633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.535451", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [13] Shall Article XIII, Section of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to effectuate technical changes to remove obsolete language referring to reading rooms and also be amended to provide that library fines be paid into the general fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8082, "fingerprint": "2005|200500062|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500062|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4adec43d57decfa5", "measure_id": "200500062", "measure_letter": "14", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [14] Shall Article IV, Section 1 and Article XXIV, Section 7 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to remove the obsolete titles of health officer and City physician and Article XIX, Section 1 of the Charter of the City of Glendale regarding the public welfare department be repealed and Section 2 be renumbered in Article X?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11628, "no_votes": 5138, "total_votes": 16766, "percent_yes": 69.35464630800429, "percent_no": 30.64535369199571, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.614906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.535729", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [14] Shall Article IV, Section 1 and Article XXIV, Section 7 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to remove the obsolete titles of health officer and City physician and Article XIX, Section 1 of the Charter of the City of Glendale regarding the public welfare department be repealed and Section 2 be renumbered in Article X?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8083, "fingerprint": "2005|200500063|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500063|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9574096a1e3afe14", "measure_id": "200500063", "measure_letter": "15", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [15] Shall Article XXIII, Section 4 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be repealed and Article IV, Section 3 be amended to provide that the Council may, by ordinance, provide for its compensation, consistent with state law, as permitted for general law cities of comparable size?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9703, "no_votes": 5998, "total_votes": 15701, "percent_yes": 61.79861155340424, "percent_no": 38.20138844659576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.615252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.535997", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [15] Shall Article XXIII, Section 4 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be repealed and Article IV, Section 3 be amended to provide that the Council may, by ordinance, provide for its compensation, consistent with state law, as permitted for general law cities of comparable size?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8084, "fingerprint": "2005|200500064|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500064|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ece69460550c327c", "measure_id": "200500064", "measure_letter": "16", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [16] Shall Article XXIII, Section 9 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to reflect current state and federal law regarding the requirement of citizenship for designated city employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11726, "no_votes": 4378, "total_votes": 16104, "percent_yes": 72.81420765027322, "percent_no": 27.185792349726782, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.615523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.536260", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [16] Shall Article XXIII, Section 9 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to reflect current state and federal law regarding the requirement of citizenship for designated city employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8085, "fingerprint": "2005|200500065|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500065|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3d440c450a10c167", "measure_id": "200500065", "measure_letter": "17", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [17] Shall Article XXIII, Section 17 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide for a technical change by providing that office hours of city officers be established by ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11395, "no_votes": 4271, "total_votes": 15666, "percent_yes": 72.73713775054259, "percent_no": 27.262862249457413, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.615892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.536530", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [17] Shall Article XXIII, Section 17 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide for a technical change by providing that office hours of city officers be established by ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8086, "fingerprint": "2005|200500066|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500066|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2a55be603d772a2d", "measure_id": "200500066", "measure_letter": "18", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [18] Shall Article XXIII, Section 27 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide that any violation of the Charter or ordinances constituting a misdemeanor may be prosecuted by city authorities as an infraction and consistent with state law the maximum penalty for a misdemeanor shall be one thousand dollars or imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11384, "no_votes": 4278, "total_votes": 15662, "percent_yes": 72.68548078150938, "percent_no": 27.314519218490616, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.616167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.536823", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [18] Shall Article XXIII, Section 27 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide that any violation of the Charter or ordinances constituting a misdemeanor may be prosecuted by city authorities as an infraction and consistent with state law the maximum penalty for a misdemeanor shall be one thousand dollars or imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8087, "fingerprint": "2005|200500067|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500067|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "870cdf48b00957c4", "measure_id": "200500067", "measure_letter": "19", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [19] Shall Article XXIV, Section 8 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to remove obsolete language regarding officers and employees as of January 1, 1937?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12149, "no_votes": 3584, "total_votes": 15733, "percent_yes": 77.21985635288883, "percent_no": 22.780143647111174, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.616438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.537092", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [19] Shall Article XXIV, Section 8 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to remove obsolete language regarding officers and employees as of January 1, 1937?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11737, "fingerprint": "2005|200500068|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500068|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d2c3b4996ac107c1", "measure_id": "200500068", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [2] Shall Article IV, Section I, Article XI, Section 1 and 4, Article XXI, Sections 14 and 22 and Article XXIV, Section 5 and 10 of the Charter of the city of Glendale be amended to remove obsolete language and provide for the change of the official titles from city controller to director of administrative services, from street superintendent to maintenance service and from superintendent of buildings to building officials?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11477, "no_votes": 4424, "total_votes": 15901, "percent_yes": 72.17785044965726, "percent_no": 27.822149550342743, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.610320", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.616711", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.537347", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [2] Shall Article IV, Section I, Article XI, Section 1 and 4, Article XXI, Sections 14 and 22 and Article XXIV, Section 5 and 10 of the Charter of the city of Glendale be amended to remove obsolete language and provide for the change of the official titles from city controller to director of administrative services, from street superintendent to maintenance service and from superintendent of buildings to building officials?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8072, "fingerprint": "2005|200500023|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500023|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "29cbac2e9e480707", "measure_id": "200500023", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to authorize the adoption of ordinances to: (1) allow retired police officers and firefighters to return to active duty by terminating their pensions and being rehired, (2) allow the maximum amount of health subsidies for retirees and beneficiaries of the Plan to be set by ordinance, and (3) allow the City to pay part of employee contributions to the Plan as agreed in labor negotiations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 213324, "no_votes": 128105, "total_votes": 341429, "percent_yes": 62.47975420951355, "percent_no": 37.52024579048645, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.610898", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.532786", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to authorize the adoption of ordinances to: (1) allow retired police officers and firefighters to return to active duty by terminating their pensions and being rehired, (2) allow the maximum amount of health subsidies for retirees and beneficiaries of the Plan to be set by ordinance, and (3) allow the City to pay part of employee contributions to the Plan as agreed in labor negotiations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8088, "fingerprint": "2005|200500069|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500069|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9d737b296529d89b", "measure_id": "200500069", "measure_letter": "20", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [20] Shall a new Article XIV be added to require that all boards and commissions be created by an ordinance, which outlines the powers and duties, the appointment and removal of members, and meetings, and further replace and repeal other unnecessary enabling language in Article XIV, Section 1, Article XV, Section 1 and Article XVI, Section 1 relating to the formation of the parks commission, planning commission, and social service commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11678, "no_votes": 3798, "total_votes": 15476, "percent_yes": 75.45877487722926, "percent_no": 24.54122512277074, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.616994", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.537616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [20] Shall a new Article XIV be added to require that all boards and commissions be created by an ordinance, which outlines the powers and duties, the appointment and removal of members, and meetings, and further replace and repeal other unnecessary enabling language in Article XIV, Section 1, Article XV, Section 1 and Article XVI, Section 1 relating to the formation of the parks commission, planning commission, and social service commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8089, "fingerprint": "2005|200500070|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500070|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "212a258a81ace862", "measure_id": "200500070", "measure_letter": "21", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [21] Shall Article VI, Section 15 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to require a vote of the people for the sale of any city owned SR (Special Recreation) zoned of five acres or more, or property dedicated to park land of five acres or more, excepting easements and transfers to other public agencies with limitations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13002, "no_votes": 3088, "total_votes": 16090, "percent_yes": 80.80795525170915, "percent_no": 19.192044748290854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.617340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.537890", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [21] Shall Article VI, Section 15 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to require a vote of the people for the sale of any city owned SR (Special Recreation) zoned of five acres or more, or property dedicated to park land of five acres or more, excepting easements and transfers to other public agencies with limitations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8090, "fingerprint": "2005|200500071|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500071|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1e31bbcda1bdd522", "measure_id": "200500071", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [3] Shall Article VI, Sections 3 and 6 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide for one additional week for canvassing returns, thereby allowing sufficient time for complete and accurate counting of all ballots?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12087, "no_votes": 3991, "total_votes": 16078, "percent_yes": 75.17726085333997, "percent_no": 24.822739146660027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.617612", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.538150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [3] Shall Article VI, Sections 3 and 6 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide for one additional week for canvassing returns, thereby allowing sufficient time for complete and accurate counting of all ballots?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8091, "fingerprint": "2005|200500072|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500072|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4194d804fb44822d", "measure_id": "200500072", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [4] Shall Article VI, Section 1 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to remove obsolete language and to provide that each candidate for member of the City Council of the City Council shall be a qualified elector pursuant to state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12560, "no_votes": 3308, "total_votes": 15868, "percent_yes": 79.1530123519032, "percent_no": 20.8469876480968, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.617878", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.538372", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [4] Shall Article VI, Section 1 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to remove obsolete language and to provide that each candidate for member of the City Council of the City Council shall be a qualified elector pursuant to state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8092, "fingerprint": "2005|200500073|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500073|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8509291c4190f0ff", "measure_id": "200500073", "measure_letter": "5", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [5] Shall Article VI, Section 5 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide that the mayor pro tem shall be selected monthly by alphabetical rotation and serve if the mayor is absent or unavailable?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11355, "no_votes": 4486, "total_votes": 15841, "percent_yes": 71.68108073985229, "percent_no": 28.31891926014771, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.618143", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.538705", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [5] Shall Article VI, Section 5 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide that the mayor pro tem shall be selected monthly by alphabetical rotation and serve if the mayor is absent or unavailable?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8093, "fingerprint": "2005|200500074|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500074|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8a9071a4076d0018", "measure_id": "200500074", "measure_letter": "6", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [6] Shall Article VI, Section 9 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide that city council establish by ordinance a complete procedure to ensure the integrity of awarding all contracts and minimum dollar amount for contracts requiring competitive bidding?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12440, "no_votes": 3390, "total_votes": 15830, "percent_yes": 78.58496525584333, "percent_no": 21.41503474415667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.618411", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.538943", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [6] Shall Article VI, Section 9 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide that city council establish by ordinance a complete procedure to ensure the integrity of awarding all contracts and minimum dollar amount for contracts requiring competitive bidding?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8094, "fingerprint": "2005|200500075|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500075|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3de6c1df459915f1", "measure_id": "200500075", "measure_letter": "7", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [7] Shall Article VI, Section 13 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide that vacancies of city council, city clerk, or city treasurer be filled by appointment within 30 days, or otherwise call for an immediate special election to be held within 120 days unless the earliest next general municipal election or next county of state election with which a city election may be consolidated is no more than 180 days later?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12199, "no_votes": 3565, "total_votes": 15764, "percent_yes": 77.385181426034, "percent_no": 22.614818573966005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.618730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.539165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [7] Shall Article VI, Section 13 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide that vacancies of city council, city clerk, or city treasurer be filled by appointment within 30 days, or otherwise call for an immediate special election to be held within 120 days unless the earliest next general municipal election or next county of state election with which a city election may be consolidated is no more than 180 days later?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8095, "fingerprint": "2005|200500076|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500076|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7246c8157b97bbbe", "measure_id": "200500076", "measure_letter": "8", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [8] Shall Article IX, Section 2 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide that in the event the City manager is incapacitated from performing the essential functions of his duties for a period of thirty days, the Assistant City Manager shall perform such duties during such time and that on or after the thirtieth day of incapacity, the City Council may appoint an interim City Manager?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13969, "no_votes": 2966, "total_votes": 16935, "percent_yes": 82.48597578978448, "percent_no": 17.514024210215524, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.619002", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.539386", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [8] Shall Article IX, Section 2 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to provide that in the event the City manager is incapacitated from performing the essential functions of his duties for a period of thirty days, the Assistant City Manager shall perform such duties during such time and that on or after the thirtieth day of incapacity, the City Council may appoint an interim City Manager?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8096, "fingerprint": "2005|200500077|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500077|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2f5c3a4783e495b6", "measure_id": "200500077", "measure_letter": "9", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [9]  Shall Article IV, Section 4, Article X Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7, and Article XX Sections 1, 2 and 3 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to remove obsolete language regarding department of general government and replace with current titles, change the word \"division\" to \"department\", including \"police department\" and \"fire department\" and change the title of the division of general administration to the department of management services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12705, "no_votes": 3956, "total_votes": 16661, "percent_yes": 76.25592701518516, "percent_no": 23.744072984814835, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.619335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.539621", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. [9]  Shall Article IV, Section 4, Article X Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7, and Article XX Sections 1, 2 and 3 of the Charter of the City of Glendale be amended to remove obsolete language regarding department of general government and replace with current titles, change the word \"division\" to \"department\", including \"police department\" and \"fire department\" and change the title of the division of general administration to the department of management services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11743, "fingerprint": "2005|200500178|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500178|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "841a9dccb7d162cf", "measure_id": "200500178", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance of the People of the City of Commerce, State of California, Enacting a Hotel Visitor Tax\", for the purpose of protecting the local economy by continuing tourism promotion, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1266, "no_votes": 893, "total_votes": 2159, "percent_yes": 58.63825845298749, "percent_no": 41.36174154701251, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.616105", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.622533", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.542228", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance of the People of the City of Commerce, State of California, Enacting a Hotel Visitor Tax\", for the purpose of protecting the local economy by continuing tourism promotion, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11739, "fingerprint": "2005|200500091|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500091|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c808828e129b76af", "measure_id": "200500091", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to allow the reorganization of security and law enforcement authority at Los Angeles International Airport and other City owned airports by employing current Charter procedures to transfer some or all of that authority to other City departments or offices or to other governmental entities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 157486, "no_votes": 287708, "total_votes": 445194, "percent_yes": 35.37469058432952, "percent_no": 64.62530941567047, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.613957", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.620204", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.540333", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to allow the reorganization of security and law enforcement authority at Los Angeles International Airport and other City owned airports by employing current Charter procedures to transfer some or all of that authority to other City departments or offices or to other governmental entities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11734, "fingerprint": "2005|200500038|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500038|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "481236fa55ed37fb", "measure_id": "200500038", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain experienced, qualified teachers, support small class sizes, maintain health services to students, and maintain safe, clean campuses, shall Little Lake City Elementary School District annually collect a $145/taxable parcel tax for seven years, with all funds staying in local schools, independent community oversight of all expenditures, exemptions for those 65 years and older, an annual cost of living adjustment and no funds for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 548, "no_votes": 371, "total_votes": 919, "percent_yes": 59.630032644178456, "percent_no": 40.369967355821544, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.607084", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.612938", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.534068", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain experienced, qualified teachers, support small class sizes, maintain health services to students, and maintain safe, clean campuses, shall Little Lake City Elementary School District annually collect a $145/taxable parcel tax for seven years, with all funds staying in local schools, independent community oversight of all expenditures, exemptions for those 65 years and older, an annual cost of living adjustment and no funds for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11733, "fingerprint": "2005|200500024|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500024|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e147e2d1645d82d7", "measure_id": "200500024", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which repeals existing term limits for City Councilmembers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 957, "no_votes": 5701, "total_votes": 6658, "percent_yes": 14.37368579152898, "percent_no": 85.62631420847102, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.604985", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.611165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.532970", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which repeals existing term limits for City Councilmembers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11732, "fingerprint": "2005|200500019|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500019|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fda07ba3d5cfede6", "measure_id": "200500019", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to renew the City's authority to spend existing revenues from the special fire tax approved by two-thirds of the City's voters in 1997 to provide essential fire services by renewing the voter-approved amendment to the City's appropriation limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1224, "no_votes": 279, "total_votes": 1503, "percent_yes": 81.437125748503, "percent_no": 18.562874251497007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.603294", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.609822", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.532056", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to renew the City's authority to spend existing revenues from the special fire tax approved by two-thirds of the City's voters in 1997 to provide essential fire services by renewing the voter-approved amendment to the City's appropriation limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11731, "fingerprint": "2005|200500018|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500018|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "617dd38f599ebb64", "measure_id": "200500018", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-1328 be adopted, which ordinance renames the transient occupancy tax to the Uniform Hotel Visitors Tax and increases such tax from 9% to 12%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3772, "no_votes": 5420, "total_votes": 9192, "percent_yes": 41.03568320278503, "percent_no": 58.96431679721497, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.602936", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.609554", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.531874", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-1328 be adopted, which ordinance renames the transient occupancy tax to the Uniform Hotel Visitors Tax and increases such tax from 9% to 12%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11730, "fingerprint": "2005|200500017|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500017|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "227befdc25ddcd41", "measure_id": "200500017", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 11688, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beverly Hills amending the Beverly Hills General Plan by changing the land use map designation for that real property located at 203-221 Canon Drive/202-240 Beverly Drive (the \"Beverly Hills Gardens Specific Plan Area\") from low-density commercial to Specific Plan and adopting the Beverly Hills Gardens Specific Plan, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4482, "no_votes": 3898, "total_votes": 8380, "percent_yes": 53.48448687350835, "percent_no": 46.51551312649165, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.602539", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.609269", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.531690", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 11688, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beverly Hills amending the Beverly Hills General Plan by changing the land use map designation for that real property located at 203-221 Canon Drive/202-240 Beverly Drive (the \"Beverly Hills Gardens Specific Plan Area\") from low-density commercial to Specific Plan and adopting the Beverly Hills Gardens Specific Plan, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8068, "fingerprint": "2005|200500016|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500016|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9e5bb8039dba7e87", "measure_id": "200500016", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending Bell Gardens Municipal Code Section\r\n2.60.010 be adopted to read \"Pursuant to Section 1301 of the California Elections Code, the City Municipal Election date shall be the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of odd-numbered years, commencing on November 6, 2007,\" causing the consolidation of the Bell Gardens general municipal elections with the Los Angeles County consolidated general elections, if approved by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1408, "no_votes": 363, "total_votes": 1771, "percent_yes": 79.5031055900621, "percent_no": 20.496894409937894, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.608995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.531508", "update_count": 9, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending Bell Gardens Municipal Code Section\r\n2.60.010 be adopted to read \"Pursuant to Section 1301 of the California Elections Code, the City Municipal Election date shall be the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of odd-numbered years, commencing on November 6, 2007,\" causing the consolidation of the Bell Gardens general municipal elections with the Los Angeles County consolidated general elections, if approved by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8073, "fingerprint": "2005|200500025|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500025|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "95c9629936bdddbd", "measure_id": "200500025", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by two-thirds plus-one voters preventing severe cuts to existing levels of public safety and addressing future protection demands by adding a daily fifth police patrol and a firefighter-paramedic position, bonding to replace two aged and substandard fire stations, resolving pay unfairness, and fund the safety pension shortfall so it is protected through applying a dedicated annual special levy on parcels not to exceed 25 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4045, "no_votes": 2816, "total_votes": 6861, "percent_yes": 58.95642034688821, "percent_no": 41.04357965311179, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.611474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.533155", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted by two-thirds plus-one voters preventing severe cuts to existing levels of public safety and addressing future protection demands by adding a daily fifth police patrol and a firefighter-paramedic position, bonding to replace two aged and substandard fire stations, resolving pay unfairness, and fund the safety pension shortfall so it is protected through applying a dedicated annual special levy on parcels not to exceed 25 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11742, "fingerprint": "2005|200500175|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500175|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "509804dcf61708d5", "measure_id": "200500175", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Baldwin Park's transient occupancy tax, which is levied for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel or motel, be increased from ten percent (10%) to eleven percent (11%) as of January 1, 2006; and be increased from eleven percent (11%) to twelve percent (12%) as of January 1, 2008?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3202, "no_votes": 5160, "total_votes": 8362, "percent_yes": 38.29227457546041, "percent_no": 61.70772542453959, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.615287", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.621574", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.541548", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Baldwin Park's transient occupancy tax, which is levied for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel or motel, be increased from ten percent (10%) to eleven percent (11%) as of January 1, 2006; and be increased from eleven percent (11%) to twelve percent (12%) as of January 1, 2008?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11740, "fingerprint": "2005|200500092|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500092|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c6f5a81fa0383413", "measure_id": "200500092", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to eliminate the provision that requires a voter to cast a vote on the question of recalling the incumbent in order to have his or her vote counted for a replacement candidate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 224986, "no_votes": 208872, "total_votes": 433858, "percent_yes": 51.85705922214181, "percent_no": 48.14294077785819, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.614216", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.620479", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.540597", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to eliminate the provision that requires a voter to cast a vote on the question of recalling the incumbent in order to have his or her vote counted for a replacement candidate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11735, "fingerprint": "2005|200500039|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500039|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3507a9925cc58d45", "measure_id": "200500039", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality educational programs and classroom instruction, to prevent significant increases in class size, to avoid reductions in teaching positions, to attract and retain the best teachers and employees, and to support educational programs that enhance student achievement, shall the Lowell Joint School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $95 on each parcel of land within the District each year for eight years with an exemption opportunity for seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1566, "no_votes": 1393, "total_votes": 2959, "percent_yes": 52.92328489354512, "percent_no": 47.07671510645488, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.607317", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.613209", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.534254", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality educational programs and classroom instruction, to prevent significant increases in class size, to avoid reductions in teaching positions, to attract and retain the best teachers and employees, and to support educational programs that enhance student achievement, shall the Lowell Joint School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $95 on each parcel of land within the District each year for eight years with an exemption opportunity for seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8069, "fingerprint": "2005|200500020|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500020|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7dc7bfe5f501702a", "measure_id": "200500020", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 259 be adopted to amend and clarify the existing special fire tax to provide that the proceeds of the special fire tax may be used to fund not only fire prevention and suppression services, but also life safety services, including, but not limited to, paramedic and emergency medical response services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1212, "no_votes": 302, "total_votes": 1514, "percent_yes": 80.05284015852048, "percent_no": 19.947159841479518, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.610099", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.532240", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 259 be adopted to amend and clarify the existing special fire tax to provide that the proceeds of the special fire tax may be used to fund not only fire prevention and suppression services, but also life safety services, including, but not limited to, paramedic and emergency medical response services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8100, "fingerprint": "2005|200500176|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500176|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "51b5384b3c707e1b", "measure_id": "200500176", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should Calabasas annex 152 acres on Mulholland Highway east of Las Virgenes Road for the Malibu Valley Inn & Spa \u2013 a 203-room resort, 5 estate homes, facilities for swimming, equestrian use, tennis, fitness spa, restaurant, winery, shops, conference rooms, and underground parking as described in the project\u2019s draft environmental impact report \u2013 in lieu of up to 81 estate homes on 443 acres if not annexed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2486, "no_votes": 3695, "total_votes": 6181, "percent_yes": 40.22002912150137, "percent_no": 59.77997087849863, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.621859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.541798", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should Calabasas annex 152 acres on Mulholland Highway east of Las Virgenes Road for the Malibu Valley Inn & Spa \u2013 a 203-room resort, 5 estate homes, facilities for swimming, equestrian use, tennis, fitness spa, restaurant, winery, shops, conference rooms, and underground parking as described in the project\u2019s draft environmental impact report \u2013 in lieu of up to 81 estate homes on 443 acres if not annexed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8101, "fingerprint": "2005|200500177|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500177|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "27620ef25fa7d0c8", "measure_id": "200500177", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2005-225 be adopted to protect and preserve the existing areas of Open Space in Calabasas by requiring two-thirds voter approval before any land in the City designated as Open Space may be redesignated for another use?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5028, "no_votes": 941, "total_votes": 5969, "percent_yes": 84.2352152789412, "percent_no": 15.764784721058803, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.622254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.542042", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2005-225 be adopted to protect and preserve the existing areas of Open Space in Calabasas by requiring two-thirds voter approval before any land in the City designated as Open Space may be redesignated for another use?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8103, "fingerprint": "2005|200500180|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500180|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1f243497cd858436", "measure_id": "200500180", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted adding the beach to the Restricted Open Space (O-S-1) zone and limiting improvements in the O-S-1 zone to (a) landscaping, irrigation and erosion control, and (b) replacement or repair of existing improvements within their existing footprint?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2346, "no_votes": 3055, "total_votes": 5401, "percent_yes": 43.43640066654323, "percent_no": 56.56359933345677, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.623097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.542616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted adding the beach to the Restricted Open Space (O-S-1) zone and limiting improvements in the O-S-1 zone to (a) landscaping, irrigation and erosion control, and (b) replacement or repair of existing improvements within their existing footprint?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8104, "fingerprint": "2005|200500181|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500181|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "faa8c4f82da0947b", "measure_id": "200500181", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to fund Public Safety Services in the City of Sierra Madre, including Advanced Life Support (paramedic) emergency medical services, replacement of fire equipment, personnel to improve fire and emergency medical response, and to allow more competitive Police Department salaries, shall the City of Sierra Madre impose a special public safety tax beginning with Fiscal Year 2006-07?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2143, "no_votes": 2135, "total_votes": 4278, "percent_yes": 50.09350163627864, "percent_no": 49.90649836372136, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.623374", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.542812", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to fund Public Safety Services in the City of Sierra Madre, including Advanced Life Support (paramedic) emergency medical services, replacement of fire equipment, personnel to improve fire and emergency medical response, and to allow more competitive Police Department salaries, shall the City of Sierra Madre impose a special public safety tax beginning with Fiscal Year 2006-07?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11745, "fingerprint": "2005|200500250|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500250|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "23f3cd8b4535452c", "measure_id": "200500250", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Glendora Unified School District upgrade, repair and improve classrooms and school facilities including upgrading aging heating/ventilation/air-conditioning systems, upgrading electrical power/ wiring for technology in classrooms, repair/ replace aging roofs, restrooms, install fire alarms, bring school facilities into compliance with current building safety/health codes, by issuing $41,310,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, qualify for $12 million in state grants with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6588, "no_votes": 3854, "total_votes": 10442, "percent_yes": 63.091361808082745, "percent_no": 36.908638191917255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.617704", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.624207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.543360", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Glendora Unified School District upgrade, repair and improve classrooms and school facilities including upgrading aging heating/ventilation/air-conditioning systems, upgrading electrical power/ wiring for technology in classrooms, repair/ replace aging roofs, restrooms, install fire alarms, bring school facilities into compliance with current building safety/health codes, by issuing $41,310,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, qualify for $12 million in state grants with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8074, "fingerprint": "2005|200500026|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500026|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "99aa55a43fc9397a", "measure_id": "200500026", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance amending Section 8-2.03 of the Redondo Beach Municipal Code to authorize increasing the transient occupancy tax charged to guests by hotel operators from the current ten percent (10%) to an amount not to exceed twelve percent (12%) of the rent charged by the operators effective July 1, 2005, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4910, "no_votes": 4061, "total_votes": 8971, "percent_yes": 54.73191394493367, "percent_no": 45.26808605506633, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.611805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.533337", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance amending Section 8-2.03 of the Redondo Beach Municipal Code to authorize increasing the transient occupancy tax charged to guests by hotel operators from the current ten percent (10%) to an amount not to exceed twelve percent (12%) of the rent charged by the operators effective July 1, 2005, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11744, "fingerprint": "2005|200500182|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500182|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b543b73607c8851e", "measure_id": "200500182", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Signal Hill impose a tax of 3% on charges for electric, gas, water and other utility services (with exemptions for seniors and low income households) for a period of no more than 15 years to finance and construct a new, modernized police station in the City of Signal Hill and to pay for police equipment and other related costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1035, "no_votes": 1278, "total_votes": 2313, "percent_yes": 44.74708171206226, "percent_no": 55.25291828793774, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.617163", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.623647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.542999", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Signal Hill impose a tax of 3% on charges for electric, gas, water and other utility services (with exemptions for seniors and low income households) for a period of no more than 15 years to finance and construct a new, modernized police station in the City of Signal Hill and to pay for police equipment and other related costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8075, "fingerprint": "2005|200500027|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500027|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "513f6e4905c0b1b0", "measure_id": "200500027", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance amending the Redondo Beach Municipal Code Section 6-1.22 regarding Business License Tax rates, last modified in 1991, authorizing the establishment of an annual CPI adjustment to begin July, 2005, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3786, "no_votes": 4997, "total_votes": 8783, "percent_yes": 43.10600022771262, "percent_no": 56.89399977228738, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.612073", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.533521", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance amending the Redondo Beach Municipal Code Section 6-1.22 regarding Business License Tax rates, last modified in 1991, authorizing the establishment of an annual CPI adjustment to begin July, 2005, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8105, "fingerprint": "2005|200500183|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500183|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "200500183", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 902, "no_votes": 1233, "total_votes": 2135, "percent_yes": 42.248243559718965, "percent_no": 57.751756440281035, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.623935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.543180", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11741, "fingerprint": "2005|200500133|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500133|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c9a71d9c5fa65a98", "measure_id": "200500133", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you support the formation of a new Antelope Valley Flood Control District, which would take three to four years to form at an ongoing average annual property assessment currently estimated to be approximately $150 to $200 per lot?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12799, "no_votes": 33518, "total_votes": 46317, "percent_yes": 27.63348230671243, "percent_no": 72.36651769328756, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.614741", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.621028", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.541083", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you support the formation of a new Antelope Valley Flood Control District, which would take three to four years to form at an ongoing average annual property assessment currently estimated to be approximately $150 to $200 per lot?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8076, "fingerprint": "2005|200500028|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500028|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ed0abcf7ededfa14", "measure_id": "200500028", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) For the properties bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Catalina Avenue, Beryl Street, Harbor Drive and Herondo Street, the City Council requests you choose which of the following two visions, created by city residents through a consensus building process, you would prefer to guide future development (Yes=A, No=B): A. Acquire and develop 76.5 acres for park and recreation purposes, including both passive and active uses, at a cost to the taxpayers estimated to be in excess of $345 million with the possibility of undetermined funding from outside public and private sources, including State bond funds; and with a combined annual General Fund increase in operating costs and loss of revenue estimated to be in excess of $2.9 million. OR B. Allow mixed uses including a minimum 16 acres of park and privately financed development of 350 residences plus hotels and conference facilities including 400 standard and 150 condo hotel rooms. Public parks are estimated to cost $50.6 million to be financed by developer fees, redevelopment bonds, and approximately $6.6 million from taxpayers, with the possibility of undetermined funding from outside public or private sources. Net annual General Fund revenue increase of approximately $770,000 is anticipated.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4883, "no_votes": 3921, "total_votes": 8804, "percent_yes": 55.463425715583824, "percent_no": 44.536574284416176, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.612345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.533703", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) For the properties bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Catalina Avenue, Beryl Street, Harbor Drive and Herondo Street, the City Council requests you choose which of the following two visions, created by city residents through a consensus building process, you would prefer to guide future development (Yes=A, No=B): A. Acquire and develop 76.5 acres for park and recreation purposes, including both passive and active uses, at a cost to the taxpayers estimated to be in excess of $345 million with the possibility of undetermined funding from outside public and private sources, including State bond funds; and with a combined annual General Fund increase in operating costs and loss of revenue estimated to be in excess of $2.9 million. OR B. Allow mixed uses including a minimum 16 acres of park and privately financed development of 350 residences plus hotels and conference facilities including 400 standard and 150 condo hotel rooms. Public parks are estimated to cost $50.6 million to be financed by developer fees, redevelopment bonds, and approximately $6.6 million from taxpayers, with the possibility of undetermined funding from outside public or private sources. Net annual General Fund revenue increase of approximately $770,000 is anticipated.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8099, "fingerprint": "2005|200500134|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500134|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9e76ae2f753b8b9f", "measure_id": "200500134", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you support the annexation of Antelope Valley to the existing Los Angeles County Flood Control District, which would take two to three years to annex at an ongoing average annual property assessment currently estimated to be approximately $125 to $175 per lot?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10393, "no_votes": 31143, "total_votes": 41536, "percent_yes": 25.02166795069337, "percent_no": 74.97833204930663, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.621302", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.541315", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you support the annexation of Antelope Valley to the existing Los Angeles County Flood Control District, which would take two to three years to annex at an ongoing average annual property assessment currently estimated to be approximately $125 to $175 per lot?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8077, "fingerprint": "2005|200500029|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500029|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4203e95218aa1abb", "measure_id": "200500029", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance extending the Library Special Tax to June 30, 2011 in order to provide funding of the maintenance and operations of the South Pasadena Public Library at the current level of library services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3717, "no_votes": 728, "total_votes": 4445, "percent_yes": 83.62204724409449, "percent_no": 16.37795275590551, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.612612", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.533885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance extending the Library Special Tax to June 30, 2011 in order to provide funding of the maintenance and operations of the South Pasadena Public Library at the current level of library services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8102, "fingerprint": "2005|200500179|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500179|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "93dd185fef94368e", "measure_id": "200500179", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of El Monte eliminate the elective office of Mayor in favor of procedures which provide that the office of Mayor shall be occupied by each of the five members of the City Council on a rotating basis, except as otherwise provided by ordinance. (If approved, this Measure will not take effect until November 2007. Voters must still vote to elect a Mayor at the November 8, 2005 consolidated general municipal election.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3010, "no_votes": 6339, "total_votes": 9349, "percent_yes": 32.19595678682212, "percent_no": 67.80404321317788, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.622811", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.542414", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of El Monte eliminate the elective office of Mayor in favor of procedures which provide that the office of Mayor shall be occupied by each of the five members of the City Council on a rotating basis, except as otherwise provided by ordinance. (If approved, this Measure will not take effect until November 2007. Voters must still vote to elect a Mayor at the November 8, 2005 consolidated general municipal election.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8097, "fingerprint": "2005|200500078|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500078|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c3071f61c24e42aa", "measure_id": "200500078", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the South Gate City Council enact a permit system regulating the number of vehicles that may be parked overnight on City streets?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2025, "no_votes": 2471, "total_votes": 4496, "percent_yes": 45.04003558718861, "percent_no": 54.95996441281139, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.619609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.539865", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the South Gate City Council enact a permit system regulating the number of vehicles that may be parked overnight on City streets?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8107, "fingerprint": "2005|200500252|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500252|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b607aced25e077fc", "measure_id": "200500252", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete the next phase of school renovations, qualify for over $11,000,000 in state matching funds and improve safety and educational opportunities by replacing aging sewer/water lines, improving fire alarms, upgrading heating/ventilation, replacing 30-year old portables, building classrooms to accommodate growth, improving seismic safety and completing projects detailed in the core academic school facilities plan, shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District issue $30,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15496, "no_votes": 6398, "total_votes": 21894, "percent_yes": 70.77738193112269, "percent_no": 29.22261806887731, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.624750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.543730", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete the next phase of school renovations, qualify for over $11,000,000 in state matching funds and improve safety and educational opportunities by replacing aging sewer/water lines, improving fire alarms, upgrading heating/ventilation, replacing 30-year old portables, building classrooms to accommodate growth, improving seismic safety and completing projects detailed in the core academic school facilities plan, shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District issue $30,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with mandatory audits and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11746, "fingerprint": "2005|200500253|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500253|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "21785e2c62bd9bfb", "measure_id": "200500253", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District issue $10,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates to improve school grounds and facilities including replacing deteriorating school fencing to establish a safe school perimeter, renovating playfields and play courts, repairing unsafe bleachers, replacing aging gym floors that can no longer be resurfaced, adding physical education facilities to accommodate growing enrollment and completing other projects in the co-curricular school facilities plan with mandatory audits and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14678, "no_votes": 7233, "total_votes": 21911, "percent_yes": 66.9891835151294, "percent_no": 33.0108164848706, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.618519", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.625019", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.543910", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District issue $10,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates to improve school grounds and facilities including replacing deteriorating school fencing to establish a safe school perimeter, renovating playfields and play courts, repairing unsafe bleachers, replacing aging gym floors that can no longer be resurfaced, adding physical education facilities to accommodate growing enrollment and completing other projects in the co-curricular school facilities plan with mandatory audits and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11738, "fingerprint": "2005|200500079|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500079|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4e15e99df1bca50a", "measure_id": "200500079", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of South Gate adopt an ordinance to establish a Utility Users' Tax not to exceed 5% to fund general City services and programs including police, parks and recreation, and library services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1222, "no_votes": 3134, "total_votes": 4356, "percent_yes": 28.05325987144169, "percent_no": 71.9467401285583, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.613690", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.619880", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.540102", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of South Gate adopt an ordinance to establish a Utility Users' Tax not to exceed 5% to fund general City services and programs including police, parks and recreation, and library services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8070, "fingerprint": "2005|200500021|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500021|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b0a9faf7efd5f607", "measure_id": "200500021", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain current levels of public service in La Verne, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the existing utility user's tax from 4% to 6%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2521, "no_votes": 2352, "total_votes": 4873, "percent_yes": 51.73404473630208, "percent_no": 48.26595526369792, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.610365", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.532420", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain current levels of public service in La Verne, shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the existing utility user's tax from 4% to 6%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8108, "fingerprint": "2005|200500254|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500254|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "77ea4f4903d6eff3", "measure_id": "200500254", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the merit (civil service) system for school employees not requiring certification qualifications, as provided for in Article 6 (commencing with Section 45240 of Chapter 5 of Part 25 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Education Code of the State of California), and which has been in operation for at least five years, be terminated by the Torrance Unified School District of Los Angeles County on May 7, 2006.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10975, "no_votes": 15384, "total_votes": 26359, "percent_yes": 41.636632649190034, "percent_no": 58.363367350809966, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.625295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.544095", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the merit (civil service) system for school employees not requiring certification qualifications, as provided for in Article 6 (commencing with Section 45240 of Chapter 5 of Part 25 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Education Code of the State of California), and which has been in operation for at least five years, be terminated by the Torrance Unified School District of Los Angeles County on May 7, 2006.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8106, "fingerprint": "2005|200500251|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500251|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0a930136d2c6a627", "measure_id": "200500251", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce overcrowding and improve learning, shall the Los Angeles Unified School District: continue repair/upgrade of aging/deteriorating classrooms, restrooms; build up-to-date, energy efficient neighborhood schools; early childhood education centers; upgrade fire/earthquake safety, emergency response equipment; purchase library books; upgrade computer technology; eliminate asbestos, lead paint hazards by issuing $3,985 billion in bonds, at legal interest rates; with guaranteed annual financial/performance audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 443905, "no_votes": 227731, "total_votes": 671636, "percent_yes": 66.0930920915496, "percent_no": 33.90690790845041, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.624478", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.543543", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce overcrowding and improve learning, shall the Los Angeles Unified School District: continue repair/upgrade of aging/deteriorating classrooms, restrooms; build up-to-date, energy efficient neighborhood schools; early childhood education centers; upgrade fire/earthquake safety, emergency response equipment; purchase library books; upgrade computer technology; eliminate asbestos, lead paint hazards by issuing $3,985 billion in bonds, at legal interest rates; with guaranteed annual financial/performance audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8110, "fingerprint": "2005|200500256|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500256|MADERA", "content_hash": "01e54eddaaef90bf", "measure_id": "200500256", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to meet the needs of student growth, expand campuses through construction of new buildings, provide continued access to education and technology, repair and upgrade existing facilities and furnish and equip buildings, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $36,000,000 in bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and facilities with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45, "no_votes": 52, "total_votes": 97, "percent_yes": 46.39175257731959, "percent_no": 53.60824742268041, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.625945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.544459", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to meet the needs of student growth, expand campuses through construction of new buildings, provide continued access to education and technology, repair and upgrade existing facilities and furnish and equip buildings, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $36,000,000 in bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and facilities with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8111, "fingerprint": "2005|200500257|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500257|MADERA", "content_hash": "6d71bdba94f221b7", "measure_id": "200500257", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Yosemite Joint Union High School District and Coarsegold Union School District be reorganized to form a new unified school district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5132, "no_votes": 2802, "total_votes": 7934, "percent_yes": 64.68364003024956, "percent_no": 35.31635996975044, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.626213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.544681", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Yosemite Joint Union High School District and Coarsegold Union School District be reorganized to form a new unified school district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8109, "fingerprint": "2005|200500255|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500255|MADERA", "content_hash": "b1643cd8001c17d0", "measure_id": "200500255", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and ensure local control of our schools, shall the Chawanakee Unified School District be authorized to construct a new comprehensive high school to provide students with modern classrooms and school facilities comparable to neighboring schools, reduce parent and student travel, and make the District eligible for up to $26,000,000 in State grants by issuing $9,000,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1126, "no_votes": 850, "total_votes": 1976, "percent_yes": 56.9838056680162, "percent_no": 43.0161943319838, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.625669", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.544275", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and ensure local control of our schools, shall the Chawanakee Unified School District be authorized to construct a new comprehensive high school to provide students with modern classrooms and school facilities comparable to neighboring schools, reduce parent and student travel, and make the District eligible for up to $26,000,000 in State grants by issuing $9,000,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11748, "fingerprint": "2005|200500122|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500122|MARIN", "content_hash": "20e9d23ba7c7213d", "measure_id": "200500122", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve quality education at San Rafael and Terra Linda High Schools, improve reading and mathematic, technology and science programs, preserve small class sizes, and attract and retain quality teachers, shall San Rafael High School District continue the current parcel tax with a levy of $98.90 per developed or undeveloped parcel beginning 7/1/06 for eight years with subsequent 5% annual cost of living adjustment and including exemptions for those 65 and older and annual citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11548, "no_votes": 4161, "total_votes": 15709, "percent_yes": 73.5119994907378, "percent_no": 26.488000509262207, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-08-30", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.621985", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.628539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.547028", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve quality education at San Rafael and Terra Linda High Schools, improve reading and mathematic, technology and science programs, preserve small class sizes, and attract and retain quality teachers, shall San Rafael High School District continue the current parcel tax with a levy of $98.90 per developed or undeveloped parcel beginning 7/1/06 for eight years with subsequent 5% annual cost of living adjustment and including exemptions for those 65 and older and annual citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8114, "fingerprint": "2005|200500006|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500006|MARIN", "content_hash": "3faea5c7ebc5404d", "measure_id": "200500006", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce the impact of unprecedented school funding cuts and protect quality education in Novato's schools by preserving essential educational programs; maintaining small class sizes in math, science, English and elementary grades; retaining teachers and avoiding extensive layoffs; and keeping school libraries open shall Novato Unified School District extend its expiring school parcel tax for six years at $155 per parcel, with an exemption for seniors, no money for administrator salaries, and all money benefiting Novato schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13310, "no_votes": 4418, "total_votes": 17728, "percent_yes": 75.07897111913357, "percent_no": 24.92102888086643, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.627118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.545281", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce the impact of unprecedented school funding cuts and protect quality education in Novato's schools by preserving essential educational programs; maintaining small class sizes in math, science, English and elementary grades; retaining teachers and avoiding extensive layoffs; and keeping school libraries open shall Novato Unified School District extend its expiring school parcel tax for six years at $155 per parcel, with an exemption for seniors, no money for administrator salaries, and all money benefiting Novato schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11751, "fingerprint": "2005|200500258|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500258|MARIN", "content_hash": "1178b24afdf43fac", "measure_id": "200500258", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete the Facility Master Plan that resulted in successfully rebuilding our schools, on budget and carefully monitored, shall Reed Union School District issue $13 million of bonds to complete the last set of improvements: upgrade science classrooms; renovate athletic fields for a safer environment; improve technology communication systems; build a middle school gymnasium; remove remaining dry rot; complete site access and landscaping plans and finish all necessary work related to the Facility Master Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3907, "no_votes": 1659, "total_votes": 5566, "percent_yes": 70.19403521379806, "percent_no": 29.80596478620194, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.623120", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.629751", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.548143", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete the Facility Master Plan that resulted in successfully rebuilding our schools, on budget and carefully monitored, shall Reed Union School District issue $13 million of bonds to complete the last set of improvements: upgrade science classrooms; renovate athletic fields for a safer environment; improve technology communication systems; build a middle school gymnasium; remove remaining dry rot; complete site access and landscaping plans and finish all necessary work related to the Facility Master Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11750, "fingerprint": "2005|200500184|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500184|MARIN", "content_hash": "807613aacd8a7a03", "measure_id": "200500184", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted approving a special San Anselmo municipal services tax of $250 per year per living unit and per 1500 square feet of nonresidential use, for a period of four years, to be used to: restore and maintain Police, Parks, and Library staffing services, maintain minimum staffing at San Anselmo fire stations, increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax for the next four years and establishing a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3021, "no_votes": 2414, "total_votes": 5435, "percent_yes": 55.58417663293468, "percent_no": 44.41582336706532, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.622511", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.629190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.547594", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted approving a special San Anselmo municipal services tax of $250 per year per living unit and per 1500 square feet of nonresidential use, for a period of four years, to be used to: restore and maintain Police, Parks, and Library staffing services, maintain minimum staffing at San Anselmo fire stations, increasing the appropriations limit by the amount of said tax for the next four years and establishing a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11747, "fingerprint": "2005|200500121|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500121|MARIN", "content_hash": "aa89f3d85436f805", "measure_id": "200500121", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve quality K-8 education, improve reading and mathematics programs, enhance technology and science programs, preserve small class sizes, and attract and retain quality teachers and staff, shall the San Rafael Elementary School District continue the current parcel tax with a levy of $144.76 per developed or undeveloped parcel beginning 7/1/06 for eight years with subsequent 5% annual cost of living adjustment and including exemptions for those 65 and older and annual citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6801, "no_votes": 2740, "total_votes": 9541, "percent_yes": 71.28183628550467, "percent_no": 28.718163714495333, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-08-30", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.621740", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.628261", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.546736", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve quality K-8 education, improve reading and mathematics programs, enhance technology and science programs, preserve small class sizes, and attract and retain quality teachers and staff, shall the San Rafael Elementary School District continue the current parcel tax with a levy of $144.76 per developed or undeveloped parcel beginning 7/1/06 for eight years with subsequent 5% annual cost of living adjustment and including exemptions for those 65 and older and annual citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8113, "fingerprint": "2005|200500005|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500005|MARIN", "content_hash": "cfcbfb3f58d696fa", "measure_id": "200500005", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the high quality of public education in Corte Madera and Larkspur by providing continued support for small class sizes, exceptional instructional programs, and highly qualified staff for a growing student population, shall the Larkspur School District be authorized to renew a parcel tax commencing July 1, 2005 for a maximum of six years at the rate of $289.00 per parcel per year with a 5% annual adjustment and an exemption for property owners 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2754, "no_votes": 866, "total_votes": 3620, "percent_yes": 76.07734806629834, "percent_no": 23.92265193370166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.626782", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.545077", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the high quality of public education in Corte Madera and Larkspur by providing continued support for small class sizes, exceptional instructional programs, and highly qualified staff for a growing student population, shall the Larkspur School District be authorized to renew a parcel tax commencing July 1, 2005 for a maximum of six years at the rate of $289.00 per parcel per year with a 5% annual adjustment and an exemption for property owners 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11749, "fingerprint": "2005|200500135|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500135|MARIN", "content_hash": "78db86e1048abd17", "measure_id": "200500135", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2005-1 of the Muir Beach Community Services District levying a special tax annually for a period of four (4) years, commencing FY 2006-2007, terminating in FY 2010-2011, in the amount of $3,250.00 per parcel for improved commercially zoned property, $300.00 per separate habitable structure on parcels containing residential property and $300.00 per parcel on all other parcels be adopted to provide funds for water capital improvements as specified in the Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 175, "no_votes": 23, "total_votes": 198, "percent_yes": 88.38383838383838, "percent_no": 11.61616161616162, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.622242", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.628897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.547303", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2005-1 of the Muir Beach Community Services District levying a special tax annually for a period of four (4) years, commencing FY 2006-2007, terminating in FY 2010-2011, in the amount of $3,250.00 per parcel for improved commercially zoned property, $300.00 per separate habitable structure on parcels containing residential property and $300.00 per parcel on all other parcels be adopted to provide funds for water capital improvements as specified in the Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8115, "fingerprint": "2005|200500007|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500007|MARIN", "content_hash": "f3544db2443b27c5", "measure_id": "200500007", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance the educational environment and improve safety for students, staff and the community through the reconstruction of deteriorated elementary classrooms, library and facilities (most over 60 years old); to rectify substandard heating, ventilation, plumbing, roofing and electrical systems; to comply with current earthquake and flood safety codes; and to improve energy-efficiency; shall Ross Elementary School District issue $19 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with a Citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures and audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 781, "no_votes": 546, "total_votes": 1327, "percent_yes": 58.85455915599096, "percent_no": 41.14544084400904, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.627391", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.545573", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance the educational environment and improve safety for students, staff and the community through the reconstruction of deteriorated elementary classrooms, library and facilities (most over 60 years old); to rectify substandard heating, ventilation, plumbing, roofing and electrical systems; to comply with current earthquake and flood safety codes; and to improve energy-efficiency; shall Ross Elementary School District issue $19 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with a Citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures and audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8112, "fingerprint": "2005|200500004|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500004|MARIN", "content_hash": "b20861c47a012394", "measure_id": "200500004", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Marinwood Community Services District Ordinance 16, which imposes an annual special tax of one hundred and fifty ($150.00) dollars on each improved parcel within Marinwood Community Services District for park, open spaces and street landscape maintenance, and which allows for annual cost of living adjustment to the special tax, be approved and shall the Marinwood Community Services District appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 899, "no_votes": 368, "total_votes": 1267, "percent_yes": 70.95501183898973, "percent_no": 29.044988161010266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.626483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.544885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Marinwood Community Services District Ordinance 16, which imposes an annual special tax of one hundred and fifty ($150.00) dollars on each improved parcel within Marinwood Community Services District for park, open spaces and street landscape maintenance, and which allows for annual cost of living adjustment to the special tax, be approved and shall the Marinwood Community Services District appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8116, "fingerprint": "2005|200500008|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500008|MARIN", "content_hash": "1fb8a7f4f82d2263", "measure_id": "200500008", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the high quality of education in Ross Valley Schools (with reduced class sizes and high student achievement) and to protect the quality of life and property values in our community, should the existing special tax for Ross Valley elementary and middle schools (12% of the District Budget) be continued for an additional eight years with audit and accountability measures and with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5204, "no_votes": 1067, "total_votes": 6271, "percent_yes": 82.9851698293733, "percent_no": 17.014830170626695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.627661", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.546031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the high quality of education in Ross Valley Schools (with reduced class sizes and high student achievement) and to protect the quality of life and property values in our community, should the existing special tax for Ross Valley elementary and middle schools (12% of the District Budget) be continued for an additional eight years with audit and accountability measures and with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8117, "fingerprint": "2005|200500095|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500095|MARIN", "content_hash": "c2a22a686817ec7e", "measure_id": "200500095", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted approving a special Fairfax municipal services tax of $125 per year for each business occupancy and dwelling unit, for a period of five years, to be used exclusively to: maintain 24-hour, seven days per week staffing of the Fairfax Police Station and Fire House, maintain Fairfax's 911 Emergency Dispatch, perform Public Works safety improvements, restore funding for Youth Services and establish a citizen's oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1645, "no_votes": 668, "total_votes": 2313, "percent_yes": 71.11975789018591, "percent_no": 28.88024210981409, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.627928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.546432", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted approving a special Fairfax municipal services tax of $125 per year for each business occupancy and dwelling unit, for a period of five years, to be used exclusively to: maintain 24-hour, seven days per week staffing of the Fairfax Police Station and Fire House, maintain Fairfax's 911 Emergency Dispatch, perform Public Works safety improvements, restore funding for Youth Services and establish a citizen's oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8118, "fingerprint": "2005|200500185|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500185|MARIN", "content_hash": "0449aac32f6ea561", "measure_id": "200500185", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent further cuts and preserve funding for general city services, including maintaining the number of on-duty firefighters and police officers on patrol, preventing the closure of fire stations and community centers, repairing city streets and maintaining library service hours, shall the City of San Rafael adopt an ordinance enacting a one-half of one percent transactions (sales) and use tax, automatically expiring in ten years, with independent oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12419, "no_votes": 5242, "total_votes": 17661, "percent_yes": 70.31878149595153, "percent_no": 29.681218504048474, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.629474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.547872", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent further cuts and preserve funding for general city services, including maintaining the number of on-duty firefighters and police officers on patrol, preventing the closure of fire stations and community centers, repairing city streets and maintaining library service hours, shall the City of San Rafael adopt an ordinance enacting a one-half of one percent transactions (sales) and use tax, automatically expiring in ten years, with independent oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8119, "fingerprint": "2005|200500259|MARIPOSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500259|MARIPOSA", "content_hash": "a42b4525af2a6af9", "measure_id": "200500259", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Mariposa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Should the Yosemite Joint Union High School District and the Coarsegold Union School District be reorganized to form a new unified school district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58, "no_votes": 24, "total_votes": 82, "percent_yes": 70.73170731707317, "percent_no": 29.268292682926827, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.630025", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.548431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Yosemite Joint Union High School District and the Coarsegold Union School District be reorganized to form a new unified school district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mariposa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8120, "fingerprint": "2005|200500096|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500096|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "c04172da17ea0520", "measure_id": "200500096", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1063 be adopted to impose a transaction (sales) and use tax at maximum rate of one-half of one percent within the city limits of the City of Ukiah?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1442, "no_votes": 634, "total_votes": 2076, "percent_yes": 69.46050096339114, "percent_no": 30.53949903660886, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.630297", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.548719", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1063 be adopted to impose a transaction (sales) and use tax at maximum rate of one-half of one percent within the city limits of the City of Ukiah?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8121, "fingerprint": "2005|200500097|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500097|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "23e83373399b753d", "measure_id": "200500097", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should additional funds for public safety, including police, fire and emergency medical services, be the first priority for the use of new sales tax revenues in the City of Ukiah?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1640, "no_votes": 381, "total_votes": 2021, "percent_yes": 81.14794656110837, "percent_no": 18.85205343889163, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.630645", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.549003", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should additional funds for public safety, including police, fire and emergency medical services, be the first priority for the use of new sales tax revenues in the City of Ukiah?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8122, "fingerprint": "2005|200500260|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500260|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "e083d764538e60e4", "measure_id": "200500260", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and renovate Ukiah High School, including projects such as modernizing ventilation and heating systems; replacing deteriorating plumbing; upgrading electrical systems; installing data networks; upgrading science, library, music, and theater classrooms; replace aging roofs; and to qualify for up to $7,000,000 in State matching grants; shall the Ukiah Unified School District be authorized to issue $43 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to finance improvement, acquisition and construction of school facilities and grounds.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6675, "no_votes": 3147, "total_votes": 9822, "percent_yes": 67.95968234575443, "percent_no": 32.04031765424557, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.631122", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.549281", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and renovate Ukiah High School, including projects such as modernizing ventilation and heating systems; replacing deteriorating plumbing; upgrading electrical systems; installing data networks; upgrading science, library, music, and theater classrooms; replace aging roofs; and to qualify for up to $7,000,000 in State matching grants; shall the Ukiah Unified School District be authorized to issue $43 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to finance improvement, acquisition and construction of school facilities and grounds.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8124, "fingerprint": "2005|200500261|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500261|MERCED", "content_hash": "2a46aa647d664cc5", "measure_id": "200500261", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding by building a new elementary school; and to preserve class size reduction, technology programs, library services, after school programs; and other programs contributing to students' academic achievements; to repair, replace, upgrade school facilities; and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Livingston Union School District issue $10,000,000 of general obligation bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with an independent oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1002, "no_votes": 485, "total_votes": 1487, "percent_yes": 67.38399462004035, "percent_no": 32.616005379959645, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.632152", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.549856", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding by building a new elementary school; and to preserve class size reduction, technology programs, library services, after school programs; and other programs contributing to students' academic achievements; to repair, replace, upgrade school facilities; and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Livingston Union School District issue $10,000,000 of general obligation bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with an independent oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8123, "fingerprint": "2005|200500186|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500186|MERCED", "content_hash": "b6aeebf817b9481d", "measure_id": "200500186", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve the safety and character of Merced, with a priority on funding essential services such as police, fire and street maintenance, as well as other general City services, shall an Ordinance be adopted increasing the City's sales tax by 1/2 cent for every taxable dollar spent for not more than 20 years, with citizens oversight and independent annual audits of all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7200, "no_votes": 3991, "total_votes": 11191, "percent_yes": 64.33741399338754, "percent_no": 35.66258600661246, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.631579", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.549572", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve the safety and character of Merced, with a priority on funding essential services such as police, fire and street maintenance, as well as other general City services, shall an Ordinance be adopted increasing the City's sales tax by 1/2 cent for every taxable dollar spent for not more than 20 years, with citizens oversight and independent annual audits of all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8125, "fingerprint": "2005|200500136|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500136|MONO", "content_hash": "2e61cd64450c0807", "measure_id": "200500136", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the county ordinance entitled The Fiscal Office Consolidation Act (consolidating the currently elective county offices of Auditor-Controller and Treasurer-Tax Collector into a new appointive county office of Director of Finance) be approved and enacted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1719, "no_votes": 1240, "total_votes": 2959, "percent_yes": 58.09395065900642, "percent_no": 41.90604934099358, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.632608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.550233", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the county ordinance entitled The Fiscal Office Consolidation Act (consolidating the currently elective county offices of Auditor-Controller and Treasurer-Tax Collector into a new appointive county office of Director of Finance) be approved and enacted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8126, "fingerprint": "2005|200500137|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500137|MONO", "content_hash": "a3cbe461cee75cc1", "measure_id": "200500137", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the county office of Clerk-Recorder become appointive instead of elective?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1592, "no_votes": 1404, "total_votes": 2996, "percent_yes": 53.13751668891856, "percent_no": 46.86248331108144, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.633050", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.550489", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the county office of Clerk-Recorder become appointive instead of elective?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8130, "fingerprint": "2005|200500262|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500262|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d1ada377af4078cf", "measure_id": "200500262", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue the renovation and modernization of its schools to enhance student learning and safety by building, renovating and acquiring school buildings, classrooms and facilities, shall the Carmel Unified School District issue $21,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform annual audits with no bond money to be used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7744, "no_votes": 2768, "total_votes": 10512, "percent_yes": 73.66818873668188, "percent_no": 26.331811263318116, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.634362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.551631", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue the renovation and modernization of its schools to enhance student learning and safety by building, renovating and acquiring school buildings, classrooms and facilities, shall the Carmel Unified School District issue $21,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform annual audits with no bond money to be used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8131, "fingerprint": "2005|200500263|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500263|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "01e54eddaaef90bf", "measure_id": "200500263", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to meet the needs of student growth, expand campuses through construction of new buildings, provide continued access to education and technology, repair and upgrade existing facilities and furnish and equip buildings, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $36,000,000 in bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and facilities with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 4, "percent_yes": 50.0, "percent_no": 50.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.634826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.551935", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to meet the needs of student growth, expand campuses through construction of new buildings, provide continued access to education and technology, repair and upgrade existing facilities and furnish and equip buildings, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $36,000,000 in bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and facilities with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8127, "fingerprint": "2005|200500138|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500138|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "ba4600de7335599f", "measure_id": "200500138", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 04-421 amending the Monterey County General Plan and the Greater Salinas Area Plan, including amending the Rancho San Juan Area of Development Concentration Development Guidelines and Principles, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18958, "no_votes": 58906, "total_votes": 77864, "percent_yes": 24.34758039658892, "percent_no": 75.65241960341108, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.633508", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.550786", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 04-421 amending the Monterey County General Plan and the Greater Salinas Area Plan, including amending the Rancho San Juan Area of Development Concentration Development Guidelines and Principles, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8128, "fingerprint": "2005|200500187|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500187|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b9282c9b9c043edb", "measure_id": "200500187", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help protect King City from state takeaways and provide adequate funding for police and fire services, shall King City amend Chapter 3.28 of the City's Municipal Code by raising the utility user tax rate on telephone, electricity, water, gas, and cable television services to the statewide average of six percent (6%), subject to annual review by a Citizen Advisory Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 640, "no_votes": 611, "total_votes": 1251, "percent_yes": 51.15907274180656, "percent_no": 48.84092725819344, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.633810", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.551074", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help protect King City from state takeaways and provide adequate funding for police and fire services, shall King City amend Chapter 3.28 of the City's Municipal Code by raising the utility user tax rate on telephone, electricity, water, gas, and cable television services to the statewide average of six percent (6%), subject to annual review by a Citizen Advisory Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8129, "fingerprint": "2005|200500188|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500188|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a4807815e683826d", "measure_id": "200500188", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To address an existing emergency related to Salinas' ability to fund all general public services, including basic services such as police, fire safety, paramedics, libraries, recreation, crossing guards, graffiti removal, anti-gang programs, and street and park maintenance, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy a transactions and use tax of a half cent, which would sunset in 10 years and include an independent citizens oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13284, "no_votes": 8165, "total_votes": 21449, "percent_yes": 61.93295724742413, "percent_no": 38.06704275257587, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.634085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.551333", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address an existing emergency related to Salinas' ability to fund all general public services, including basic services such as police, fire safety, paramedics, libraries, recreation, crossing guards, graffiti removal, anti-gang programs, and street and park maintenance, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy a transactions and use tax of a half cent, which would sunset in 10 years and include an independent citizens oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8132, "fingerprint": "2005|200500264|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500264|NAPA", "content_hash": "edbcbb4b0ecb30ca", "measure_id": "200500264", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Howell Mountain Elementary School District be authorized to replace outdated plumbing and water systems, upgrade inadequate plumbing and water systems, upgrade inadequate electrical systems to improve energy efficiency and increase student access to computers and modern technology, make health and safety improvements, modernize outdated classrooms, and upgrade old restrooms by issuing $2,900,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 663, "no_votes": 276, "total_votes": 939, "percent_yes": 70.6070287539936, "percent_no": 29.392971246006397, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.635156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.552339", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Howell Mountain Elementary School District be authorized to replace outdated plumbing and water systems, upgrade inadequate plumbing and water systems, upgrade inadequate electrical systems to improve energy efficiency and increase student access to computers and modern technology, make health and safety improvements, modernize outdated classrooms, and upgrade old restrooms by issuing $2,900,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8133, "fingerprint": "2005|200500040|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500040|NEVADA", "content_hash": "4ae1a45f317b7de7", "measure_id": "200500040", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District continue to collect $98/year per taxable parcel for seven years, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older for classroom supplies, materials, lower 4th - 8th grade class size, increased core academic class offerings in middle and high schools, vocational education, music, computers, technology support, physical education, playground and field maintenance, nursing, bus replacement fund, elementary school counseling and librarians?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2930, "no_votes": 862, "total_votes": 3792, "percent_yes": 77.26793248945147, "percent_no": 22.732067510548532, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.635442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.552976", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District continue to collect $98/year per taxable parcel for seven years, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older for classroom supplies, materials, lower 4th - 8th grade class size, increased core academic class offerings in middle and high schools, vocational education, music, computers, technology support, physical education, playground and field maintenance, nursing, bus replacement fund, elementary school counseling and librarians?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11753, "fingerprint": "2005|200500295|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500295|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c7278362e0dd3953", "measure_id": "200500295", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a temporary sales tax increase one-half of one percent (0.5%), which will end after six (6) years, be adopted to help limit budget cuts in the City's General Fund resulting from local diasters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2610, "no_votes": 2054, "total_votes": 4664, "percent_yes": 55.96054888507719, "percent_no": 44.03945111492281, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-12-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.629730", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.638191", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.555412", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a temporary sales tax increase one-half of one percent (0.5%), which will end after six (6) years, be adopted to help limit budget cuts in the City's General Fund resulting from local diasters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8135, "fingerprint": "2005|200500080|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500080|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b1a94e68fef067f5", "measure_id": "200500080", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Ana enforce Ordinance NS-2649 permitting the development of One Broadway Plaza, a 37 story office building and related retail improvements and parking?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9301, "no_votes": 7123, "total_votes": 16424, "percent_yes": 56.630540672187045, "percent_no": 43.369459327812955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-04-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.636012", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.553775", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Ana enforce Ordinance NS-2649 permitting the development of One Broadway Plaza, a 37 story office building and related retail improvements and parking?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11752, "fingerprint": "2005|200500139|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500139|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4775ddce57466faa", "measure_id": "200500139", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance requiring that the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues be allocated by the County only to eligible public safety services, defined as public safety services provided by the County of Orange, specifically the County Probation Department, including its juvenile hall detention facilities and its adult and juvenile offenders' monitoring programs; the County Sheriff-Coroner, including its adult correctional facilities, investigative divisions, specialized patrol functions and coroner investigation teams; the County District Attorney, including its prosecution and investigative units, and County lifeguards, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 204125, "no_votes": 388694, "total_votes": 592819, "percent_yes": 34.43293821554302, "percent_no": 65.56706178445698, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.627842", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.636288", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.554207", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance requiring that the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues be allocated by the County only to eligible public safety services, defined as public safety services provided by the County of Orange, specifically the County Probation Department, including its juvenile hall detention facilities and its adult and juvenile offenders' monitoring programs; the County Sheriff-Coroner, including its adult correctional facilities, investigative divisions, specialized patrol functions and coroner investigation teams; the County District Attorney, including its prosecution and investigative units, and County lifeguards, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8134, "fingerprint": "2005|200500041|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500041|ORANGE", "content_hash": "875f4adf4e0b034f", "measure_id": "200500041", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality educational programs and classroom instruction, to prevent significant increases in class size, to avoid reducation in teaching positions, to attract and retain the best teachers and employees, and to support educational programs that enhance student achivement, shall the Lowell Joint School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $95 on each parcel of land within the District each year for eight years with an exemption opporutnity to seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1566, "no_votes": 1393, "total_votes": 2959, "percent_yes": 52.92328489354512, "percent_no": 47.07671510645488, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.635717", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.553395", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality educational programs and classroom instruction, to prevent significant increases in class size, to avoid reducation in teaching positions, to attract and retain the best teachers and employees, and to support educational programs that enhance student achivement, shall the Lowell Joint School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $95 on each parcel of land within the District each year for eight years with an exemption opporutnity to seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8136, "fingerprint": "2005|200500140|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500140|ORANGE", "content_hash": "bcec92d427c8eadf", "measure_id": "200500140", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance shifting a portion of the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues from the County Sheriff-Coroner and District Attorney to the Orange County Homeland Security Infrastructure Fund and establishing the Homeland Security Infrastructure Oversight Committee, as described herein: commencing in fiscal year 2006-2007, $10 million would be allocated to the Homeland Security Infrastructure Fund (\"Homeland Security Fund\"); in fiscal year 2009- 2010 and every fiscal year thereafter, the County's $10 million allocation to the Homeland Security Fund will increase or decrease by the same percentage as the prior fiscal year's increase or decrease in the amount of Proposition 172 sales tax revenues the County receives that is not allocated to cities (\"County's Share\"); this ordinance would create the Homeland Security Infrastructure Fund Oversight Committee, consisting of the County Sheriff, County District Attorney, Board of Supervisor's Chairman, Orange County Fire Chiefs' Association President and Orange County Police Chiefs' and Sheriffs' Association President; the Oversight Committee will submit to the County an annual recommendation for allocation of the Homeland Security Fund to public safety service providers authorized by California law to receive those funds; the remainder of the County's Proposition 172 funds may be allocated by the County to eligible public safety services as defined by the ordinance to mean those provided by the County of Orange, specifically the County Probation Department, including its juvenile hall detention facilities and its adult and juvenile offenders' monitoring programs; the County Sheriff-Coroner, including its adult correctional facilities, investigative divisions, specialized patrol functions and coroner investigation teams; the County District Attorney, including its prosecution and investigative units, and County lifeguards, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 161530, "no_votes": 422195, "total_votes": 583725, "percent_yes": 27.67227718531843, "percent_no": 72.32772281468158, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.636584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.554438", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance shifting a portion of the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues from the County Sheriff-Coroner and District Attorney to the Orange County Homeland Security Infrastructure Fund and establishing the Homeland Security Infrastructure Oversight Committee, as described herein: commencing in fiscal year 2006-2007, $10 million would be allocated to the Homeland Security Infrastructure Fund (\"Homeland Security Fund\"); in fiscal year 2009- 2010 and every fiscal year thereafter, the County's $10 million allocation to the Homeland Security Fund will increase or decrease by the same percentage as the prior fiscal year's increase or decrease in the amount of Proposition 172 sales tax revenues the County receives that is not allocated to cities (\"County's Share\"); this ordinance would create the Homeland Security Infrastructure Fund Oversight Committee, consisting of the County Sheriff, County District Attorney, Board of Supervisor's Chairman, Orange County Fire Chiefs' Association President and Orange County Police Chiefs' and Sheriffs' Association President; the Oversight Committee will submit to the County an annual recommendation for allocation of the Homeland Security Fund to public safety service providers authorized by California law to receive those funds; the remainder of the County's Proposition 172 funds may be allocated by the County to eligible public safety services as defined by the ordinance to mean those provided by the County of Orange, specifically the County Probation Department, including its juvenile hall detention facilities and its adult and juvenile offenders' monitoring programs; the County Sheriff-Coroner, including its adult correctional facilities, investigative divisions, specialized patrol functions and coroner investigation teams; the County District Attorney, including its prosecution and investigative units, and County lifeguards, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8137, "fingerprint": "2005|200500141|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500141|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6fb325287df4d1a8", "measure_id": "200500141", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance shifting a portion of the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues from the County Sheriff-Coroner and District Attorney to the Orange County Fire Authority (\"OCFA\"), a joint powers agency serving 43% of the County's population in 22 of 34 cities and unincorporated territory, utilizing the following formula: the amount of Proposition 172 sales tax revenues the County receives that is not allocated to cities (\"County's Share\") in fiscal year 2004-2005 (\"Base Year Amount\") would be subtracted from the County's Share, beginning with the 2005-2006 fiscal year; if the resulting figure is a positive number, 50% of that amount would be allocated to OCFA, and 50% plus the Base Year Amount would be allocated to the County for allocation to public safety providers as provided by California law; however, for any year that the Base Year Amount is greater than the County's Share, OCFA would not be entitled to receive any of the County Share; the allocation formula would change once the amount paid to OCFA in any fiscal year equals 10% of the County's Share; thereafter, 10% of the County's Share would be allocated to OCFA, and 90% would be available for allocation by the County to public safety providers as provided by California law, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 160711, "no_votes": 433868, "total_votes": 594579, "percent_yes": 27.02937708866273, "percent_no": 72.97062291133727, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.636949", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.554648", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance shifting a portion of the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues from the County Sheriff-Coroner and District Attorney to the Orange County Fire Authority (\"OCFA\"), a joint powers agency serving 43% of the County's population in 22 of 34 cities and unincorporated territory, utilizing the following formula: the amount of Proposition 172 sales tax revenues the County receives that is not allocated to cities (\"County's Share\") in fiscal year 2004-2005 (\"Base Year Amount\") would be subtracted from the County's Share, beginning with the 2005-2006 fiscal year; if the resulting figure is a positive number, 50% of that amount would be allocated to OCFA, and 50% plus the Base Year Amount would be allocated to the County for allocation to public safety providers as provided by California law; however, for any year that the Base Year Amount is greater than the County's Share, OCFA would not be entitled to receive any of the County Share; the allocation formula would change once the amount paid to OCFA in any fiscal year equals 10% of the County's Share; thereafter, 10% of the County's Share would be allocated to OCFA, and 90% would be available for allocation by the County to public safety providers as provided by California law, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8138, "fingerprint": "2005|200500142|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500142|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e08a9b5450c15c4c", "measure_id": "200500142", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance shifting a portion of the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues from the County Sheriff-Coroner and District Attorney to the County Probation Department, utilizing the following formula: commencing with the 2005-2006 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, 5% of the County's share of Proposition 172 sales tax revenues during each such fiscal year will be allocated to the Probation Department and the remaining 95% would be available for allocation by the County to public safety service providers authorized by California law to receive those funds, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 183130, "no_votes": 399250, "total_votes": 582380, "percent_yes": 31.44510457089872, "percent_no": 68.55489542910128, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.637286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.554850", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance shifting a portion of the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues from the County Sheriff-Coroner and District Attorney to the County Probation Department, utilizing the following formula: commencing with the 2005-2006 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, 5% of the County's share of Proposition 172 sales tax revenues during each such fiscal year will be allocated to the Probation Department and the remaining 95% would be available for allocation by the County to public safety service providers authorized by California law to receive those funds, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8140, "fingerprint": "2005|200500265|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500265|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c3cdc92e5a6f0e12", "measure_id": "200500265", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase access to educational opportunities for all students, provide facilities to meet current state educational requirements and improve student safety by completing specific projects throughout the school district, shall Newport-Mesa Unified School District issue $282 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with new bonds being issued only if projected annual tax rates do not exceed those being paid today by local taxpayers, guaranteed independent annual audits, a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee and no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26123, "no_votes": 20401, "total_votes": 46524, "percent_yes": 56.14951422921502, "percent_no": 43.85048577078498, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.637850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.555217", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase access to educational opportunities for all students, provide facilities to meet current state educational requirements and improve student safety by completing specific projects throughout the school district, shall Newport-Mesa Unified School District issue $282 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with new bonds being issued only if projected annual tax rates do not exceed those being paid today by local taxpayers, guaranteed independent annual audits, a Citizens\u2019 Oversight Committee and no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8139, "fingerprint": "2005|200500189|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500189|ORANGE", "content_hash": "56e0d530208d4525", "measure_id": "200500189", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing Utility Users Tax of 4.5% on electricity and 6% on other utilities be reduced to 4.5% for all utilities, for the funding of general city services and programs effective July 1, 2006, and extending beyond December 31, 2007, provided that annual financial audits continue to be conducted and that low income seniors and the disabled remain exempt from the tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5147, "no_votes": 5701, "total_votes": 10848, "percent_yes": 47.44653392330383, "percent_no": 52.55346607669617, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.637563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.555035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing Utility Users Tax of 4.5% on electricity and 6% on other utilities be reduced to 4.5% for all utilities, for the funding of general city services and programs effective July 1, 2006, and extending beyond December 31, 2007, provided that annual financial audits continue to be conducted and that low income seniors and the disabled remain exempt from the tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8147, "fingerprint": "2005|200500266|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500266|PLACER", "content_hash": "6b2a8a5a4f7d6fb2", "measure_id": "200500266", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Board Member to succeed Tere Ferguson? Center Unified School District", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 123, "no_votes": 33, "total_votes": 156, "percent_yes": 78.84615384615384, "percent_no": 21.15384615384616, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.640146", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.556694", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Board Member to succeed Tere Ferguson? Center Unified School District", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8148, "fingerprint": "2005|200500267|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500267|PLACER", "content_hash": "39e5428a5015800f", "measure_id": "200500267", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall board member Scott Rodowick be recalled from office? Center Unified School", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126, "no_votes": 35, "total_votes": 161, "percent_yes": 78.26086956521739, "percent_no": 21.73913043478261, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.640409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.556873", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall board member Scott Rodowick be recalled from office? Center Unified School", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8141, "fingerprint": "2005|200500042|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500042|PLACER", "content_hash": "4ae1a45f317b7de7", "measure_id": "200500042", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District continue to collect $98/year per taxable parcel for seven years, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older for classroom supplies, materials, lower 4th - 8th grade class size, increased core academic class offerings in middle and high schools, vocational education, music, computers, technology support, physical education, playground and field maintenance, nursing, bus replacement fund, elementary school counseling and librarians?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2358, "no_votes": 857, "total_votes": 3215, "percent_yes": 73.34370139968895, "percent_no": 26.656298600311047, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.638470", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.555598", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Tahoe Truckee Unified School District continue to collect $98/year per taxable parcel for seven years, with citizen oversight and exemptions for taxpayers aged 65 and older for classroom supplies, materials, lower 4th - 8th grade class size, increased core academic class offerings in middle and high schools, vocational education, music, computers, technology support, physical education, playground and field maintenance, nursing, bus replacement fund, elementary school counseling and librarians?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8142, "fingerprint": "2005|200500105|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500105|PLACER", "content_hash": "5d3066649b494ece", "measure_id": "200500105", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure reliable funding for our schools, provide programs to aid students with their reading skills, preserve small class sizes, maintain academic excellence in math, science, library and music programs, retain qualified teachers, provide students with computer literacy skills, shall the Placer Hills Union School District levy a parcel tax of $48 for four years with annual audits and public review with no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2132, "no_votes": 2181, "total_votes": 4313, "percent_yes": 49.43194991884999, "percent_no": 50.56805008115001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.638744", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.555786", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure reliable funding for our schools, provide programs to aid students with their reading skills, preserve small class sizes, maintain academic excellence in math, science, library and music programs, retain qualified teachers, provide students with computer literacy skills, shall the Placer Hills Union School District levy a parcel tax of $48 for four years with annual audits and public review with no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8145, "fingerprint": "2005|200500191|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500191|PLACER", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200500191", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8678, "no_votes": 6150, "total_votes": 14828, "percent_yes": 58.52441327218775, "percent_no": 41.47558672781225, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.639604", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.556334", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8146, "fingerprint": "2005|200500192|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500192|PLACER", "content_hash": "0bff57b5c1978316", "measure_id": "200500192", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer by appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8322, "no_votes": 6502, "total_votes": 14824, "percent_yes": 56.13869400971397, "percent_no": 43.86130599028603, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.639881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.556513", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer by appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8143, "fingerprint": "2005|200500143|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500143|PLACER", "content_hash": "64c901500d9a2906", "measure_id": "200500143", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should Placer County designate 1,136 acres adjacent to the Western boundary of Roseville as the location for a new private, accredited four-year university and community, provided that no taxpayer funds are used to build the university, all provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act are followed during all phases of the project, and that the Board of Supervisors reserves its authority to implement or amend the Placer County General Plan and development policies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63280, "no_votes": 40828, "total_votes": 104108, "percent_yes": 60.78303300418796, "percent_no": 39.21696699581204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.639021", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.555967", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should Placer County designate 1,136 acres adjacent to the Western boundary of Roseville as the location for a new private, accredited four-year university and community, provided that no taxpayer funds are used to build the university, all provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act are followed during all phases of the project, and that the Board of Supervisors reserves its authority to implement or amend the Placer County General Plan and development policies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8144, "fingerprint": "2005|200500190|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500190|PLACER", "content_hash": "4f9bcbdb7335a8f9", "measure_id": "200500190", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Community Recreation Center): 1) issue not more than $22,230,000 of 30-year bonds to build the core of the North Tahoe Recreation Center on Dollar Hill; 2) levy a special tax which shall escalate at 2% annually to pay bond debt service and to support the Center's operation; and 3) have an appropriations limit of $2,000,000 per year? After bonds are paid off, the tax may continue at a reduced level to fund only operations, if necessary.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1132, "no_votes": 2118, "total_votes": 3250, "percent_yes": 34.830769230769235, "percent_no": 65.16923076923077, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.639334", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.556150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Community Recreation Center): 1) issue not more than $22,230,000 of 30-year bonds to build the core of the North Tahoe Recreation Center on Dollar Hill; 2) levy a special tax which shall escalate at 2% annually to pay bond debt service and to support the Center's operation; and 3) have an appropriations limit of $2,000,000 per year? After bonds are paid off, the tax may continue at a reduced level to fund only operations, if necessary.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8152, "fingerprint": "2005|200500087|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500087|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d85c506ff1666eb3", "measure_id": "200500087", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Douglas R. McAllister be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of Murrieta?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5645, "no_votes": 6717, "total_votes": 12362, "percent_yes": 45.6641320174729, "percent_no": 54.3358679825271, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.641486", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.557608", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Douglas R. McAllister be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of Murrieta?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8153, "fingerprint": "2005|200500088|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500088|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b6b9bfcb376b1cd5", "measure_id": "200500088", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Kelly Seyarto be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of Murrieta?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6065, "no_votes": 6239, "total_votes": 12304, "percent_yes": 49.29291287386216, "percent_no": 50.70708712613784, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.641852", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.557790", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Kelly Seyarto be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of Murrieta?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8154, "fingerprint": "2005|200500089|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500089|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "aa55e89f7812201b", "measure_id": "200500089", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Jack F. (No Suggestions) be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of Murrieta?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6283, "no_votes": 6045, "total_votes": 12328, "percent_yes": 50.965282284231016, "percent_no": 49.034717715768984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.642118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.557969", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jack F. (No Suggestions) be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of Murrieta?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8149, "fingerprint": "2005|200500001|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500001|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "41900a53ee718409", "measure_id": "200500001", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on March 25, 2004, by the Executive Officer of behalf of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside ordering the reorganization affecting the City of Riverside, County Service Area 126 and the Riverside County Waste Resource Management District, and providing for Annexation 95 to the City of Riverside, and detachments from County Service Area 126 and the Riverside County Waste District Resources Management District be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions including extensions to the annexation area of the City's street lighting assessment, utility tax, general bonded indebtedness and various rates and service charges applicable within the City, all as more particularly described in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61, "no_votes": 46, "total_votes": 107, "percent_yes": 57.00934579439252, "percent_no": 42.99065420560748, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-01-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.640678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.557052", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on March 25, 2004, by the Executive Officer of behalf of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside ordering the reorganization affecting the City of Riverside, County Service Area 126 and the Riverside County Waste Resource Management District, and providing for Annexation 95 to the City of Riverside, and detachments from County Service Area 126 and the Riverside County Waste District Resources Management District be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions including extensions to the annexation area of the City's street lighting assessment, utility tax, general bonded indebtedness and various rates and service charges applicable within the City, all as more particularly described in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8150, "fingerprint": "2005|200500030|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500030|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d176e451394c90c8", "measure_id": "200500030", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Palm Springs be amended to establish a new MR (Mountain Region) designation for approximately 55.5 square miles of property in and proximate to the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains, and repeal the various land use regulations currently affecting this property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5193, "no_votes": 6290, "total_votes": 11483, "percent_yes": 45.223373682835486, "percent_no": 54.776626317164514, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.640955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.557239", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Palm Springs be amended to establish a new MR (Mountain Region) designation for approximately 55.5 square miles of property in and proximate to the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains, and repeal the various land use regulations currently affecting this property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8151, "fingerprint": "2005|200500031|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500031|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "80aa088d68b0d9f2", "measure_id": "200500031", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution 20994 approving amendments to the General Plan Use and Circulation Plan for Palm Hills area be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5089, "no_votes": 6381, "total_votes": 11470, "percent_yes": 44.367916303400165, "percent_no": 55.632083696599835, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.641222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.557422", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution 20994 approving amendments to the General Plan Use and Circulation Plan for Palm Hills area be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8155, "fingerprint": "2005|200500106|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500106|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "bf997452d7075760", "measure_id": "200500106", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety and relieve overcrowding, shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District construct schools, classrooms and schools facilities throughout the District, repair and update local schools including upgrading/installing fire safety equipment, plumbing/sewer/heating/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for technology, acquire school facilities currently leased, and qualify for State grants, by issuing $250,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, public oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1560, "no_votes": 432, "total_votes": 1992, "percent_yes": 78.3132530120482, "percent_no": 21.686746987951807, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.642384", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.558229", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety and relieve overcrowding, shall the Coachella Valley Unified School District construct schools, classrooms and schools facilities throughout the District, repair and update local schools including upgrading/installing fire safety equipment, plumbing/sewer/heating/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for technology, acquire school facilities currently leased, and qualify for State grants, by issuing $250,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, public oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8159, "fingerprint": "2005|200500268|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500268|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "0335e45f265531a8", "measure_id": "200500268", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall trustee areas be abolished in the Jurupa Unified School District, County of Riverside?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4589, "no_votes": 6560, "total_votes": 11149, "percent_yes": 41.16064221006368, "percent_no": 58.83935778993632, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.643522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.559665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall trustee areas be abolished in the Jurupa Unified School District, County of Riverside?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8157, "fingerprint": "2005|200500194|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500194|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "82e4c0a7f6ccfb25", "measure_id": "200500194", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the General Municipal Election date be changed from odd-numbered to even numbered years, effective November, 2008, resulting in the extension of the term of Council members elected in November, 2005 to November 2010 and incumbent Council members to November, 2008?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1622, "no_votes": 3610, "total_votes": 5232, "percent_yes": 31.00152905198777, "percent_no": 68.99847094801223, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.642921", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.558827", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the General Municipal Election date be changed from odd-numbered to even numbered years, effective November, 2008, resulting in the extension of the term of Council members elected in November, 2005 to November 2010 and incumbent Council members to November, 2008?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8158, "fingerprint": "2005|200500195|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500195|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7e078d635eff1c00", "measure_id": "200500195", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Norco Charter be amended to provide that any zone change from or to the following zones requires a Super Majority (4/5th) Vote of the City Council: A-E ZONE AGRICULTURAL ESTATE, A-1 ZONE AGRICULTURAL LOW DENSITY, A-2 ZONE AGRICULTURAL, R-1 ZONE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, R-3 ZONE LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, HS ZONE HILLSIDE (AGRICULTURAL/LOW DENSITY) AREAS, PD OVERLAY ZONE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS, SPECIFIC PLAN?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3991, "no_votes": 1338, "total_votes": 5329, "percent_yes": 74.89209983111277, "percent_no": 25.107900168887227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.643252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.559122", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Norco Charter be amended to provide that any zone change from or to the following zones requires a Super Majority (4/5th) Vote of the City Council: A-E ZONE AGRICULTURAL ESTATE, A-1 ZONE AGRICULTURAL LOW DENSITY, A-2 ZONE AGRICULTURAL, R-1 ZONE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, R-3 ZONE LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, HS ZONE HILLSIDE (AGRICULTURAL/LOW DENSITY) AREAS, PD OVERLAY ZONE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS, SPECIFIC PLAN?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8156, "fingerprint": "2005|200500193|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500193|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "645bee3f2c379dec", "measure_id": "200500193", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance Bill No. 2005-14 be adopted to approve an increase in the City's Admission Tax on patrons attending entertainment events from the current maximum of five percent (5%) to a maximum of ten percent (10%), subject to authorization for the City Council to annually decrease or increase the Admission Tax within the ten percent (10%) maximum tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1558, "no_votes": 343, "total_votes": 1901, "percent_yes": 81.95686480799579, "percent_no": 18.043135192004215, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.642655", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.558531", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance Bill No. 2005-14 be adopted to approve an increase in the City's Admission Tax on patrons attending entertainment events from the current maximum of five percent (5%) to a maximum of ten percent (10%), subject to authorization for the City Council to annually decrease or increase the Admission Tax within the ten percent (10%) maximum tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8160, "fingerprint": "2005|200500269|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500269|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "ba5053849dd37d31", "measure_id": "200500269", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Scott Rodowick be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3934, "no_votes": 899, "total_votes": 4833, "percent_yes": 81.3987171529071, "percent_no": 18.601282847092904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.643790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.560097", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Scott Rodowick be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8161, "fingerprint": "2005|200500270|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500270|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "41b794c437f64896", "measure_id": "200500270", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Teri Ferguson be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3746, "no_votes": 1065, "total_votes": 4811, "percent_yes": 77.86323009769279, "percent_no": 22.136769902307208, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.644054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.560419", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Teri Ferguson be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8162, "fingerprint": "2005|200500271|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500271|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "0c8ebfd449304607", "measure_id": "200500271", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a new high school to address severe overcrowding at Galt High School, shall the Galt Joint Union High School District be authorized to construct school classrooms and facilities and issue $29,200,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee appointed to monitor the way all bond funds are spent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5696, "no_votes": 2057, "total_votes": 7753, "percent_yes": 73.46833483812718, "percent_no": 26.531665161872823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.644318", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.560761", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a new high school to address severe overcrowding at Galt High School, shall the Galt Joint Union High School District be authorized to construct school classrooms and facilities and issue $29,200,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee appointed to monitor the way all bond funds are spent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8163, "fingerprint": "2005|200500272|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500272|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "def2d5aed95fcb59", "measure_id": "200500272", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to meet the needs of student growth, expand campuses through construction of new buildings, provide continued access to education and technology, repair and upgrade existing facilities and furnish and equip buildings, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $36,000,000 in bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit of repair, improvements , construction and acquisition of classrooms and facilities with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 0, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 1, "percent_yes": 0.0, "percent_no": 100.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.644589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.561091", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to meet the needs of student growth, expand campuses through construction of new buildings, provide continued access to education and technology, repair and upgrade existing facilities and furnish and equip buildings, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $36,000,000 in bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit of repair, improvements , construction and acquisition of classrooms and facilities with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8165, "fingerprint": "2005|200500107|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500107|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b298482bf77db5e9", "measure_id": "200500107", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide the Needles community with a permanent college facility for programs preparing local students for jobs and four year colleges, shall Palo Verde Community College District be authorized to finance construction, reconstruction and development of a college center/building including acquisition of real property, by issuing $6,000,000 in bonds of School Facilities Improvement District No. 2004-1 of the Palo Verde Community College District at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen's oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 608, "no_votes": 304, "total_votes": 912, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.645203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.561682", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the Needles community with a permanent college facility for programs preparing local students for jobs and four year colleges, shall Palo Verde Community College District be authorized to finance construction, reconstruction and development of a college center/building including acquisition of real property, by issuing $6,000,000 in bonds of School Facilities Improvement District No. 2004-1 of the Palo Verde Community College District at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen's oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8164, "fingerprint": "2005|200500098|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500098|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b7e86ecc353b2ae0", "measure_id": "200500098", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 5.6 acres of vacant land- generally located at the southwest corner of Schaefer Avenue and Roswell Avenue- from \"Business Park\" to \"Residential-RD20\" so that the City Council can re-zone the parcel from IPD-BP (Industrial Planned Development- Business Park) to RPD-RD20 (Residential Planned Development- RD20) for the purpose of providing senior citizen housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2451, "no_votes": 1457, "total_votes": 3908, "percent_yes": 62.71750255885363, "percent_no": 37.28249744114637, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.644928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.561394", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of 5.6 acres of vacant land- generally located at the southwest corner of Schaefer Avenue and Roswell Avenue- from \"Business Park\" to \"Residential-RD20\" so that the City Council can re-zone the parcel from IPD-BP (Industrial Planned Development- Business Park) to RPD-RD20 (Residential Planned Development- RD20) for the purpose of providing senior citizen housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8170, "fingerprint": "2005|200500273|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500273|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ef7115dcd2b4f6bd", "measure_id": "200500273", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/renovate each school of the Morongo Unified School District, improve student safety and relieve overcrowding by: Repairing deteriorating/aging classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, electrical systems and other facilities; Making safety improvements for fire/health emergencies and security upgrades; Renovating classrooms, science and computer labs and technology centers; Build and make improvements to school facilities; Shall Morongo Unified School District issue $48,150,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen's oversight, annual audits and no money for administrator safety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6563, "no_votes": 4964, "total_votes": 11527, "percent_yes": 56.93588965038605, "percent_no": 43.06411034961395, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.646760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.563011", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/renovate each school of the Morongo Unified School District, improve student safety and relieve overcrowding by: Repairing deteriorating/aging classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, electrical systems and other facilities; Making safety improvements for fire/health emergencies and security upgrades; Renovating classrooms, science and computer labs and technology centers; Build and make improvements to school facilities; Shall Morongo Unified School District issue $48,150,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen's oversight, annual audits and no money for administrator safety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8166, "fingerprint": "2005|200500196|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500196|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "885c5a4abdfef43d", "measure_id": "200500196", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance of the people of Redlands amending the principles of managed growth and the land use, circulation, open space and conservation, health and safety and noise elements of the Redlands General Plan, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6848, "no_votes": 11531, "total_votes": 18379, "percent_yes": 37.25991620871647, "percent_no": 62.74008379128353, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.645472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.561934", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance of the people of Redlands amending the principles of managed growth and the land use, circulation, open space and conservation, health and safety and noise elements of the Redlands General Plan, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8167, "fingerprint": "2005|200500197|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500197|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ec81c0f8ca039dfa", "measure_id": "200500197", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance of the people of Redlands amending the Redlands Municipal Code to adopt a new official City seal, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7623, "no_votes": 10880, "total_votes": 18503, "percent_yes": 41.19872453115711, "percent_no": 58.80127546884289, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.645741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.562227", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the initiative ordinance of the people of Redlands amending the Redlands Municipal Code to adopt a new official City seal, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8168, "fingerprint": "2005|200500198|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500198|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b7683af4e6cb119e", "measure_id": "200500198", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2606, adopting Zone Change No. 390, a change of zone from A-1 (Agricultural) District (five-acre lots) to R-R (Rural Residential) District (one-acre lots) on four contiguous lots totaling 180.9 acres located south of Highview Drive and east of Freya Drive for the Covington Project, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7700, "no_votes": 10675, "total_votes": 18375, "percent_yes": 41.9047619047619, "percent_no": 58.0952380952381, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.646007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.562523", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2606, adopting Zone Change No. 390, a change of zone from A-1 (Agricultural) District (five-acre lots) to R-R (Rural Residential) District (one-acre lots) on four contiguous lots totaling 180.9 acres located south of Highview Drive and east of Freya Drive for the Covington Project, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8169, "fingerprint": "2005|200500199|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500199|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c2c32aecb61e5c99", "measure_id": "200500199", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance entitled the \"City of San Bernardino Library Relief Act,\" approving a special tax and adding Chapter 3.42 to the San Bernardino Municipal Code be approved by the voters to help fund the City's libraries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14371, "no_votes": 11534, "total_votes": 25905, "percent_yes": 55.47577687705076, "percent_no": 44.52422312294924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.646339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.562796", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance entitled the \"City of San Bernardino Library Relief Act,\" approving a special tax and adding Chapter 3.42 to the San Bernardino Municipal Code be approved by the voters to help fund the City's libraries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11754, "fingerprint": "2005|200500200|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500200|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "68a0ddf8bfde478d", "measure_id": "200500200", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Encinitas City Council amend the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan to rezone 38 acres of agricultural land on the Ecke Ranch Specific Plan to rezone 38 acres of agricultural land on the Ecke Ranch to residential for the development of not more than 101 residential units with the following minimum significant public benefits: 8 acres of public parkland; Additional public hiking trails; Implementation of traffic circulation improvements and traffic calming measures; Enable the continuation of the Ecke Ranch agricultural business within the community.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7283, "no_votes": 13600, "total_votes": 20883, "percent_yes": 34.87525738639084, "percent_no": 65.12474261360916, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.640450", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.647472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.563387", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Encinitas City Council amend the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan to rezone 38 acres of agricultural land on the Ecke Ranch Specific Plan to rezone 38 acres of agricultural land on the Ecke Ranch to residential for the development of not more than 101 residential units with the following minimum significant public benefits: 8 acres of public parkland; Additional public hiking trails; Implementation of traffic circulation improvements and traffic calming measures; Enable the continuation of the Ecke Ranch agricultural business within the community.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8171, "fingerprint": "2005|200500115|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500115|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9f9a72346dc89a33", "measure_id": "200500115", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Diego donate to the federal government all of the City's rights, title, and interest in the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial property for the federal government's use of the property as a national memorial honoring veterans of the United States Armed Forces?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 197125, "no_votes": 62373, "total_votes": 259498, "percent_yes": 75.96397660097574, "percent_no": 24.03602339902426, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-07-26", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.647179", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.563200", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Diego donate to the federal government all of the City's rights, title, and interest in the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial property for the federal government's use of the property as a national memorial honoring veterans of the United States Armed Forces?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8172, "fingerprint": "2005|200500201|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500201|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5adbd8d6b8b585c6", "measure_id": "200500201", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance be approved imposing a one percent transaction and use tax (a sales tax) for City Services, Facilities and Programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2593, "no_votes": 3417, "total_votes": 6010, "percent_yes": 43.14475873544093, "percent_no": 56.85524126455907, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.647761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.563575", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance be approved imposing a one percent transaction and use tax (a sales tax) for City Services, Facilities and Programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8173, "fingerprint": "2005|200500274|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500274|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "619314dc2f53d52d", "measure_id": "200500274", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and provide similar schools and technology to all our students, shall Bonsall Union School District be authorized to replace and upgrade school facilites including classrooms, restrooms, and electrical, HVAC, plumbing and sewer systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and make the District eligible for $3,700,000 in State funds by issuing $17,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2767, "no_votes": 1451, "total_votes": 4218, "percent_yes": 65.59981033665244, "percent_no": 34.40018966334756, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.648034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.563755", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and provide similar schools and technology to all our students, shall Bonsall Union School District be authorized to replace and upgrade school facilites including classrooms, restrooms, and electrical, HVAC, plumbing and sewer systems; improve student access to computers and modern technology; and make the District eligible for $3,700,000 in State funds by issuing $17,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8182, "fingerprint": "2005|200500275|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500275|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "5551db046356b54a", "measure_id": "200500275", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall San Francisco Community College District (City College) increase opportunities and improve conditions at its campuses throughout San Francisco by issuing $246,300,000 in Phase II bonds at legal interest rates to pay for capital improvements including increasing student access to advanced computer technology and bio/stem cell technology, renovating classrooms, building new facilities for upper division classes, neighborhood classes and the performing arts, with annual audits, citizens' oversight and no spending for college administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134999, "no_votes": 76320, "total_votes": 211319, "percent_yes": 63.88398582238227, "percent_no": 36.11601417761773, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.650802", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.565391", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall San Francisco Community College District (City College) increase opportunities and improve conditions at its campuses throughout San Francisco by issuing $246,300,000 in Phase II bonds at legal interest rates to pay for capital improvements including increasing student access to advanced computer technology and bio/stem cell technology, renovating classrooms, building new facilities for upper division classes, neighborhood classes and the performing arts, with annual audits, citizens' oversight and no spending for college administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8174, "fingerprint": "2005|200500144|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500144|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "588bf63241d827e8", "measure_id": "200500144", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the city incur $208,000,000 of bonded indebtedness to finance sheet reconstruction, pavement renovation, disabled access curb ramp construction, sidewalk and street improvements, street structure rehabilitation and improvements, pedestrian safety street and signal improvements, street improvements for bicycle use and all other structures and improvements necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 119095, "no_votes": 91952, "total_votes": 211047, "percent_yes": 56.43055812212445, "percent_no": 43.56944187787555, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.648315", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.563939", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city incur $208,000,000 of bonded indebtedness to finance sheet reconstruction, pavement renovation, disabled access curb ramp construction, sidewalk and street improvements, street structure rehabilitation and improvements, pedestrian safety street and signal improvements, street improvements for bicycle use and all other structures and improvements necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8175, "fingerprint": "2005|200500145|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500145|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a273b06a830db3b5", "measure_id": "200500145", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create a new budget process for the Ethics Commission that alters the role of the Mayor, and authorize the Commission to hire outside counsel under certain circumstances?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 81672, "no_votes": 120968, "total_votes": 202640, "percent_yes": 40.30398736675878, "percent_no": 59.69601263324122, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.648753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.564122", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create a new budget process for the Ethics Commission that alters the role of the Mayor, and authorize the Commission to hire outside counsel under certain circumstances?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8176, "fingerprint": "2005|200500146|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500146|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b22968e2769addb7", "measure_id": "200500146", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the President of the Board of Supervisors nominate three members and the Mayor nominate four members to the Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors, and shall the members be prevented from serving as \"hold overs\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71585, "no_votes": 129801, "total_votes": 201386, "percent_yes": 35.546165076023165, "percent_no": 64.45383492397684, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.649028", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.564304", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the President of the Board of Supervisors nominate three members and the Mayor nominate four members to the Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors, and shall the members be prevented from serving as \"hold overs\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8177, "fingerprint": "2005|200500147|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500147|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "380d81e016efef34", "measure_id": "200500147", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the election date of the Assessor-Recorder and Public Defender be moved from the Statewide Primary election in June to the municipal election the following November?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 138765, "no_votes": 58998, "total_votes": 197763, "percent_yes": 70.16732149087545, "percent_no": 29.83267850912455, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.649298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.564488", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the election date of the Assessor-Recorder and Public Defender be moved from the Statewide Primary election in June to the municipal election the following November?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8178, "fingerprint": "2005|200500148|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500148|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "72575efd117008cb", "measure_id": "200500148", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City maintain and operate all 42 firehouses and specific emergency and rescue vehicles and equipment at the same levels that were used on January 1, 2004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 119581, "no_votes": 88062, "total_votes": 207643, "percent_yes": 57.58970926060595, "percent_no": 42.41029073939405, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.649569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.564669", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City maintain and operate all 42 firehouses and specific emergency and rescue vehicles and equipment at the same levels that were used on January 1, 2004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8179, "fingerprint": "2005|200500149|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500149|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "cb5546f753584d01", "measure_id": "200500149", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "May the underground parking garage in Golden Gate Park have one entrance-exit inside the Park without dedicated access lanes that lead outside the Park, and shall the number of lanes of automobiles traffic in parts of the Park be limited?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 138069, "no_votes": 65862, "total_votes": 203931, "percent_yes": 67.70378216161349, "percent_no": 32.29621783838651, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.649864", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.564854", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "May the underground parking garage in Golden Gate Park have one entrance-exit inside the Park without dedicated access lanes that lead outside the Park, and shall the number of lanes of automobiles traffic in parts of the Park be limited?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8180, "fingerprint": "2005|200500150|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500150|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1482d0067724fa09", "measure_id": "200500150", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City ban the manufacture, distribution, sale and transfer of firearms and ammunition within San Francisco, and ban City residents from possessing handguns within San Francisco?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 123033, "no_votes": 89856, "total_votes": 212889, "percent_yes": 57.7920888350267, "percent_no": 42.2079111649733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.650138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.565034", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City ban the manufacture, distribution, sale and transfer of firearms and ammunition within San Francisco, and ban City residents from possessing handguns within San Francisco?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8181, "fingerprint": "2005|200500151|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500151|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "fb570726dc27cf00", "measure_id": "200500151", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall it be City policy to oppose military recruiting in public schools and consider funding scholarships for education and training that could provide an alternative to military service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125581, "no_votes": 86723, "total_votes": 212304, "percent_yes": 59.1514997362273, "percent_no": 40.8485002637727, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.650493", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.565213", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall it be City policy to oppose military recruiting in public schools and consider funding scholarships for education and training that could provide an alternative to military service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8183, "fingerprint": "2005|200500276|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500276|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "0c8ebfd449304607", "measure_id": "200500276", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a new high school to address severe overcrowding at Galt High School, shall the Galt Joint Union High School District be authorized to construct school classrooms and facilities and issue $29,200,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee appointed to monitor the way all bond funds are spent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 873, "no_votes": 625, "total_votes": 1498, "percent_yes": 58.277703604806405, "percent_no": 41.722296395193595, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.651101", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.565576", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a new high school to address severe overcrowding at Galt High School, shall the Galt Joint Union High School District be authorized to construct school classrooms and facilities and issue $29,200,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee appointed to monitor the way all bond funds are spent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8184, "fingerprint": "2005|200500277|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500277|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "3dbff2593e340647", "measure_id": "200500277", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding by building new schools and classrooms; reconfiguring schools to improve educational opportunities, student achievement and safety; repairing, replacing or upgrading fire alarm systems, leaky roofs, electrical systems, deteriorating school facilities, and damage caused by dry rot and termites; removing asbestos and other hazardous materials; and obtaining state matching funds; shall the Stockton Unified School District issue $120 million in general obligation bonds at legal rates with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18858, "no_votes": 8309, "total_votes": 27167, "percent_yes": 69.4150992012368, "percent_no": 30.5849007987632, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.651376", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.565755", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding by building new schools and classrooms; reconfiguring schools to improve educational opportunities, student achievement and safety; repairing, replacing or upgrading fire alarm systems, leaky roofs, electrical systems, deteriorating school facilities, and damage caused by dry rot and termites; removing asbestos and other hazardous materials; and obtaining state matching funds; shall the Stockton Unified School District issue $120 million in general obligation bonds at legal rates with independent citizen oversight and no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8188, "fingerprint": "2005|200500126|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500126|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "51982c9e8c2c28c2", "measure_id": "200500126", "measure_letter": "B-05", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance of the Los Osos Community Services District be approved to amend the District Code relating to the siting of certain sewer and wastewater treatment facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3289, "no_votes": 3269, "total_votes": 6558, "percent_yes": 50.15248551387618, "percent_no": 49.84751448612382, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-09-27", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.652486", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.566468", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance of the Los Osos Community Services District be approved to amend the District Code relating to the siting of certain sewer and wastewater treatment facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8185, "fingerprint": "2005|200500123|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500123|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "e936fd62741991f8", "measure_id": "200500123", "measure_letter": "C-05", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall STAN GUSTAFSON be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the Los Osos Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3391, "no_votes": 3231, "total_votes": 6622, "percent_yes": 51.208094231350046, "percent_no": 48.791905768649954, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-09-27", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.651646", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.565935", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall STAN GUSTAFSON be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the Los Osos Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8186, "fingerprint": "2005|200500124|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500124|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "75147534a0cb4d01", "measure_id": "200500124", "measure_letter": "D-05", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall GORDON HENSLEY be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the Los Osos Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3358, "no_votes": 3264, "total_votes": 6622, "percent_yes": 50.70975536091815, "percent_no": 49.29024463908185, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-09-27", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.651914", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.566112", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall GORDON HENSLEY be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the Los Osos Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8187, "fingerprint": "2005|200500125|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500125|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "7fe2fc1a998ea81a", "measure_id": "200500125", "measure_letter": "E-05", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall RICHARD LEGROS be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the Los Osos Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3412, "no_votes": 3215, "total_votes": 6627, "percent_yes": 51.48634374528445, "percent_no": 48.51365625471555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-09-27", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.652177", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.566290", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall RICHARD LEGROS be recalled (removed) from the office of Director of the Los Osos Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8208, "fingerprint": "2005|200500281|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500281|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "230608361cc3f25d", "measure_id": "200500281", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare College of San Mateo, Canada College, and Skyline College students for universities and high demand jobs; upgrade nursing, health career, science, computer, and biotechnology labs; improve accessibility for disabled students; make earthquake safety improvements; repair/modernize libraries, classrooms, and aging facilities; and other projects in the Bond Project List, shall San Mateo County Community College District be authorized to issue $468,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits and with oversight by an Citizens' Advisory Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 114319, "no_votes": 63802, "total_votes": 178121, "percent_yes": 64.1805289662645, "percent_no": 35.819471033735496, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.658424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.573183", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare College of San Mateo, Canada College, and Skyline College students for universities and high demand jobs; upgrade nursing, health career, science, computer, and biotechnology labs; improve accessibility for disabled students; make earthquake safety improvements; repair/modernize libraries, classrooms, and aging facilities; and other projects in the Bond Project List, shall San Mateo County Community College District be authorized to issue $468,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits and with oversight by an Citizens' Advisory Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8206, "fingerprint": "2005|200500279|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500279|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6108eb190bb80d6f", "measure_id": "200500279", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student achievement and academic performance; to attract and retain highly qualified teachers; and to improve library services, shall the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District levy $100 per year taxable parcel for seven years, with certain exemptions for contiguous parcels owned by persons 65 years and older, with funds staying in local schools, and with independent community review of all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 920, "no_votes": 351, "total_votes": 1271, "percent_yes": 72.38394964594808, "percent_no": 27.61605035405192, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.657859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.572797", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student achievement and academic performance; to attract and retain highly qualified teachers; and to improve library services, shall the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District levy $100 per year taxable parcel for seven years, with certain exemptions for contiguous parcels owned by persons 65 years and older, with funds staying in local schools, and with independent community review of all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8205, "fingerprint": "2005|200500278|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500278|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ae9e5fed87300ba0", "measure_id": "200500278", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding at Sandpiper Elementary School and allow every local child to attend a neighborhood elementary school, shall Redwood School Facilities Improvement District of the Belmont-Redwood School District issue $25,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, to acquire and improve land, acquire, construct and equip classrooms, school facilities, labs and libraries, with guaranteed citizen oversight, annual public audits and with all funds spent within Redwood Shores School Facilities Improvement District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2312, "no_votes": 1089, "total_votes": 3401, "percent_yes": 67.98000588062335, "percent_no": 32.01999411937665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.657559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.572600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding at Sandpiper Elementary School and allow every local child to attend a neighborhood elementary school, shall Redwood School Facilities Improvement District of the Belmont-Redwood School District issue $25,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, to acquire and improve land, acquire, construct and equip classrooms, school facilities, labs and libraries, with guaranteed citizen oversight, annual public audits and with all funds spent within Redwood Shores School Facilities Improvement District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8209, "fingerprint": "2005|200500282|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500282|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ebcc210ee02988f9", "measure_id": "200500282", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve, renovate and modernize Woodside School, including replacing obsolete temporary structures with permanent classrooms and restrooms meeting seismic safety requirements and enhancing student safety, improving handicap accessibility, modernizing technology infrastructure throughout, reclaiming open space, and making other improvements in the Bond Project List, shall the Woodside Elementary School District issue $12 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to accountability measures including a Citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures and review independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1042, "no_votes": 480, "total_votes": 1522, "percent_yes": 68.46254927726675, "percent_no": 31.537450722733254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.658697", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.573376", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve, renovate and modernize Woodside School, including replacing obsolete temporary structures with permanent classrooms and restrooms meeting seismic safety requirements and enhancing student safety, improving handicap accessibility, modernizing technology infrastructure throughout, reclaiming open space, and making other improvements in the Bond Project List, shall the Woodside Elementary School District issue $12 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to accountability measures including a Citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures and review independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8207, "fingerprint": "2005|200500280|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500280|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "872ec7941a9a7832", "measure_id": "200500280", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to make specific repairs and improvements at each of the San Carlos School District's six school campuses, including classroom renovation, repair and upgrade of roofs, electrical, plumbing, heating, sewers, and other major systems, and construction of new classrooms at Tierra Linda Campus, all as specified in the District's Bond Project List, shall the District issue $38 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, and establish Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6240, "no_votes": 3673, "total_votes": 9913, "percent_yes": 62.94764450721275, "percent_no": 37.05235549278725, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.658156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.572989", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to make specific repairs and improvements at each of the San Carlos School District's six school campuses, including classroom renovation, repair and upgrade of roofs, electrical, plumbing, heating, sewers, and other major systems, and construction of new classrooms at Tierra Linda Campus, all as specified in the District's Bond Project List, shall the District issue $38 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, and establish Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8193, "fingerprint": "2005|200500202|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500202|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "26225f468cbccb7a", "measure_id": "200500202", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to protect and preserve hillside areas of Belmont by requiring voter approval of any future amendments to the zoning ordinances governing the HRO districts, or the General Plan land use designation HROP (which collectively constitute the City's Hillside Development Standards), if such amendments would allow increased development densities in hillside areas?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6192, "no_votes": 2240, "total_votes": 8432, "percent_yes": 73.43453510436433, "percent_no": 26.56546489563567, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.653873", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.567851", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to protect and preserve hillside areas of Belmont by requiring voter approval of any future amendments to the zoning ordinances governing the HRO districts, or the General Plan land use designation HROP (which collectively constitute the City's Hillside Development Standards), if such amendments would allow increased development densities in hillside areas?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8204, "fingerprint": "2005|200500213|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500213|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c61fc24c8260dc3a", "measure_id": "200500213", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Safe & Sane Fireworks Ordinance- which allows the continued sale, use or discharge of Safe & San Fireworks- be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6654, "no_votes": 3533, "total_votes": 10187, "percent_yes": 65.31854324138608, "percent_no": 34.68145675861392, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.657284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.572398", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Safe & Sane Fireworks Ordinance- which allows the continued sale, use or discharge of Safe & San Fireworks- be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8199, "fingerprint": "2005|200500208|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500208|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ebc6e4b6128d10c8", "measure_id": "200500208", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Portola Valley adjust the appropriations limit of the Town each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2006 by the amount of money collected from the existing 5.5% Utility Users Tax during the time of its levy and collection, provided that the authorization to so adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed four (4) years from the end of Fiscal Year 2005-2006?\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1133, "no_votes": 1039, "total_votes": 2172, "percent_yes": 52.16390423572744, "percent_no": 47.83609576427256, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.655652", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.570678", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Portola Valley adjust the appropriations limit of the Town each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2006 by the amount of money collected from the existing 5.5% Utility Users Tax during the time of its levy and collection, provided that the authorization to so adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed four (4) years from the end of Fiscal Year 2005-2006?\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8200, "fingerprint": "2005|200500209|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500209|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f2f4ecaedf19be91", "measure_id": "200500209", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Only if, Town of Portola Valley Proposition I, adjusting the Town's appropriation limit passes, shall the Town additionally adjust the appropriations limit each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2006 by the amount of money collected from imposition of the 2% Utility Users Tax (for open space purpose only) during the time of its levy and collection, provided that authorization to adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed four years from the end of Fiscal Year 2005-2006?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1209, "no_votes": 892, "total_votes": 2101, "percent_yes": 57.5440266539743, "percent_no": 42.4559733460257, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.655956", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.570993", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Only if, Town of Portola Valley Proposition I, adjusting the Town's appropriation limit passes, shall the Town additionally adjust the appropriations limit each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2006 by the amount of money collected from imposition of the 2% Utility Users Tax (for open space purpose only) during the time of its levy and collection, provided that authorization to adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed four years from the end of Fiscal Year 2005-2006?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8194, "fingerprint": "2005|200500203|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500203|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e9d7b6a638df279d", "measure_id": "200500203", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of East Palo Alto continue collecting a utility users tax for general governmental purposes, as adopted by the voters in November 2002, including police and public safety, parks and recreation, street improvements, youth and senior citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1514, "no_votes": 1304, "total_votes": 2818, "percent_yes": 53.72604684173172, "percent_no": 46.27395315826828, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.654201", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.568634", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of East Palo Alto continue collecting a utility users tax for general governmental purposes, as adopted by the voters in November 2002, including police and public safety, parks and recreation, street improvements, youth and senior citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8195, "fingerprint": "2005|200500204|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500204|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "66dd02296e86e786", "measure_id": "200500204", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To reduce violent crimes and increase public safety, shall the City of East Palo Alto increase successful after school, truancy, and job training programs, early intervention programs for children, programs to prevent child abuse and domestic violence, and increase community police officers and investigations, by authorizing a parcel tax for 10 years, subject to annual performance and financial audits by a citizens oversight committee and an exemption for senior citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1563, "no_votes": 1306, "total_votes": 2869, "percent_yes": 54.47891251307075, "percent_no": 45.52108748692925, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.654513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.569208", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce violent crimes and increase public safety, shall the City of East Palo Alto increase successful after school, truancy, and job training programs, early intervention programs for children, programs to prevent child abuse and domestic violence, and increase community police officers and investigations, by authorizing a parcel tax for 10 years, subject to annual performance and financial audits by a citizens oversight committee and an exemption for senior citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8201, "fingerprint": "2005|200500210|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500210|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5b8cf1b550c23826", "measure_id": "200500210", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall specified sections of the City Charter be amended to allow appropriations or expenditures of public money to be approved by resolution; permit the City Council to establish by motion a date for the City Manager to submit a proposed budget; and permit the City Council to adopt its budget and cancel any approved appropriation by resolution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8898, "no_votes": 6358, "total_votes": 15256, "percent_yes": 58.32459360251704, "percent_no": 41.67540639748296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.656274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.571337", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall specified sections of the City Charter be amended to allow appropriations or expenditures of public money to be approved by resolution; permit the City Council to establish by motion a date for the City Manager to submit a proposed budget; and permit the City Council to adopt its budget and cancel any approved appropriation by resolution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8202, "fingerprint": "2005|200500211|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500211|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8b21174c7fa56232", "measure_id": "200500211", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall specified sections of the City Charter be amended to permit the Library Board to furnish its proposed budget to the City Manager by the same date as required of other city departments; allow Planning Commissioners and Port Commissioners to continue to hold office until their successors are appointed and qualified; and to permit the Board of Equalization to meet on any regular City Council meeting date in July of each year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11095, "no_votes": 4328, "total_votes": 15423, "percent_yes": 71.93801465343967, "percent_no": 28.061985346560334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.656581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.571821", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall specified sections of the City Charter be amended to permit the Library Board to furnish its proposed budget to the City Manager by the same date as required of other city departments; allow Planning Commissioners and Port Commissioners to continue to hold office until their successors are appointed and qualified; and to permit the Board of Equalization to meet on any regular City Council meeting date in July of each year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8203, "fingerprint": "2005|200500212|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500212|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b2cd24b01ec636c5", "measure_id": "200500212", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a specified section of the City Charter be amended to allow a change in the various threshold amounts for the purchase of materials or supplies to determine when contracts (1) may be awarded without solicitation or advertisements; (2) may be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder after solicitation but without advertisement or public bidding; and (3) may be awarded to the lower responsible bidder after public bidding?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8066, "no_votes": 7209, "total_votes": 15275, "percent_yes": 52.80523731587561, "percent_no": 47.19476268412439, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.657013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.572135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a specified section of the City Charter be amended to allow a change in the various threshold amounts for the purchase of materials or supplies to determine when contracts (1) may be awarded without solicitation or advertisements; (2) may be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder after solicitation but without advertisement or public bidding; and (3) may be awarded to the lower responsible bidder after public bidding?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8196, "fingerprint": "2005|200500205|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500205|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a4b331462126b835", "measure_id": "200500205", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you want the City of Half Moon Bay to adopt the policy that it will exercise its eminent domain authority only in cases where the stated \"public use\" necessitating the acquisition of private property will not primarily be based on the City's desire for \"increased City revenue?\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2807, "no_votes": 1063, "total_votes": 3870, "percent_yes": 72.53229974160207, "percent_no": 27.467700258397926, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.654784", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.569400", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you want the City of Half Moon Bay to adopt the policy that it will exercise its eminent domain authority only in cases where the stated \"public use\" necessitating the acquisition of private property will not primarily be based on the City's desire for \"increased City revenue?\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8197, "fingerprint": "2005|200500206|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500206|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4c2fc7c157cf92e3", "measure_id": "200500206", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you want the City of Half Moon Bay to support the development of recycled water through its participation in the Sewer Authority Mid-Coastline Joint Powers Authority for use by consenting farmers and large scale water users such as golf courses and nurseries as a potential alternative to water these users currently draw from Half Moon Bay creeks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3289, "no_votes": 614, "total_votes": 3903, "percent_yes": 84.26851140148604, "percent_no": 15.731488598513963, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.655053", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.569685", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you want the City of Half Moon Bay to support the development of recycled water through its participation in the Sewer Authority Mid-Coastline Joint Powers Authority for use by consenting farmers and large scale water users such as golf courses and nurseries as a potential alternative to water these users currently draw from Half Moon Bay creeks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8198, "fingerprint": "2005|200500207|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500207|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "42863f2332fc69c5", "measure_id": "200500207", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance adopted by the City Council establishing a 10% parking tax on a vehicle occupant for the privilege of parking in any private off street parking facility, but not applicable to any parking privilege that is included in a room rate on a hotel bill, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2941, "no_votes": 2879, "total_votes": 5820, "percent_yes": 50.53264604810997, "percent_no": 49.46735395189003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.655334", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.570297", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance adopted by the City Council establishing a 10% parking tax on a vehicle occupant for the privilege of parking in any private off street parking facility, but not applicable to any parking privilege that is included in a room rate on a hotel bill, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8189, "fingerprint": "2005|200500032|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500032|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "aca1c6882dff9db7", "measure_id": "200500032", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance of the City of San Carlos, enacting a parcel tax $59.00 for a period of five years, with proceeds dedicated exclusively to the S.C.O.O.T shuttle bus service, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3457, "no_votes": 4180, "total_votes": 7637, "percent_yes": 45.26646588974728, "percent_no": 54.73353411025272, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.652791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.566654", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance of the City of San Carlos, enacting a parcel tax $59.00 for a period of five years, with proceeds dedicated exclusively to the S.C.O.O.T shuttle bus service, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8190, "fingerprint": "2005|200500043|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500043|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "31aeed302adda23c", "measure_id": "200500043", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Brisbane School District replace its current parcel tax by levying a special tax of not more than $96 annually per parcel to provide reading, music, and art teachers; and if funds allow, to lower class size and purchase library and instructional resources; provided that senior citizens be eligible for exemption? Shall the District's appropriation limit be raised from 7/1/2006 to 6/30/2011 in an amount equal to the levy of said tax each year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 929, "no_votes": 401, "total_votes": 1330, "percent_yes": 69.84962406015038, "percent_no": 30.150375939849624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.653064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.566833", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Brisbane School District replace its current parcel tax by levying a special tax of not more than $96 annually per parcel to provide reading, music, and art teachers; and if funds allow, to lower class size and purchase library and instructional resources; provided that senior citizens be eligible for exemption? Shall the District's appropriation limit be raised from 7/1/2006 to 6/30/2011 in an amount equal to the levy of said tax each year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8191, "fingerprint": "2005|200500090|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500090|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "876cdbd17cb21cba", "measure_id": "200500090", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain and improve quality educational programs; attract and retain quality teachers; maintain library programs; improve math and science programs; maintain music classes; preserve small class size; and provide special needs programs; shall the Redwood City School District levy a parcel tax for 5 years on commercial/industrial property square footage; and on residences of $85 per parcel with an exemption for seniors 65 years and older, with mandatory citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9763, "no_votes": 6064, "total_votes": 15827, "percent_yes": 61.68572692234788, "percent_no": 38.31427307765212, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.653333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.567077", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain and improve quality educational programs; attract and retain quality teachers; maintain library programs; improve math and science programs; maintain music classes; preserve small class size; and provide special needs programs; shall the Redwood City School District levy a parcel tax for 5 years on commercial/industrial property square footage; and on residences of $85 per parcel with an exemption for seniors 65 years and older, with mandatory citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8192, "fingerprint": "2005|200500099|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500099|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "607b55cc2222bd3f", "measure_id": "200500099", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance renewing the current Town of Atherton Parcel Tax which provides funding for Town general purposes such as, but not limited to, police and public safety services and capital improvement projects be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1776, "no_votes": 443, "total_votes": 2219, "percent_yes": 80.0360522757999, "percent_no": 19.963947724200096, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.653603", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.567404", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance renewing the current Town of Atherton Parcel Tax which provides funding for Town general purposes such as, but not limited to, police and public safety services and capital improvement projects be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11756, "fingerprint": "2005|200500214|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500214|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "170cef9ca584f0b0", "measure_id": "200500214", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Cupertino adopt an amendment to the General Plan concering housing density?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6770, "no_votes": 7912, "total_votes": 14682, "percent_yes": 46.110884075739, "percent_no": 53.889115924261, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.651521", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.659596", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.573958", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Cupertino adopt an amendment to the General Plan concering housing density?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11755, "fingerprint": "2005|200500108|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500108|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a4ba8549d31fda83", "measure_id": "200500108", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve small class size; maintain educational programs that enhance student achievement; and restore some essential educational programs--including elementary literacy, math, and art support, and middle and high school class offerings--shall the Palo Alto Unified School District replace its current parcel tax with a $493 yearly assessment for six years with an optional exemption for senior citizens and an independent oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14033, "no_votes": 4899, "total_votes": 18932, "percent_yes": 74.12317768856963, "percent_no": 25.876822311430374, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.651190", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.659312", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.573765", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve small class size; maintain educational programs that enhance student achievement; and restore some essential educational programs--including elementary literacy, math, and art support, and middle and high school class offerings--shall the Palo Alto Unified School District replace its current parcel tax with a $493 yearly assessment for six years with an optional exemption for senior citizens and an independent oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8210, "fingerprint": "2005|200500044|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500044|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f0fc387256c4e06c", "measure_id": "200500044", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain qualified teachers, maintain instructors and equipment for science and technology education, keep small class sizes in grades K-3 and 9th grade English and math, and maintain quality programs in neighborhood schools; shall Milpitas Unified School District levy an annual tax of $140 per parcel for 5 years only, with annual audits, independent citizens oversight, no money for administrator salaries, an exemption for senior citizens age 65 or older, and all money benefiting local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4443, "no_votes": 2923, "total_votes": 7366, "percent_yes": 60.31767580776541, "percent_no": 39.68232419223459, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.658966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.573573", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain qualified teachers, maintain instructors and equipment for science and technology education, keep small class sizes in grades K-3 and 9th grade English and math, and maintain quality programs in neighborhood schools; shall Milpitas Unified School District levy an annual tax of $140 per parcel for 5 years only, with annual audits, independent citizens oversight, no money for administrator salaries, an exemption for senior citizens age 65 or older, and all money benefiting local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8211, "fingerprint": "2005|200500215|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500215|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5b63211098da131a", "measure_id": "200500215", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Cupertino adopt an amendment to the General Plan concerning building heights?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6454, "no_votes": 8226, "total_votes": 14680, "percent_yes": 43.96457765667575, "percent_no": 56.03542234332425, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.659871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.574150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Cupertino adopt an amendment to the General Plan concerning building heights?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8212, "fingerprint": "2005|200500216|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500216|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b09adb1a6cbc0ff3", "measure_id": "200500216", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Cupertino adopt an amendment to the General Plan concerining building setbacks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6044, "no_votes": 8610, "total_votes": 14654, "percent_yes": 41.24471134161321, "percent_no": 58.75528865838679, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.660138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.574342", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Cupertino adopt an amendment to the General Plan concerining building setbacks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8213, "fingerprint": "2005|200500217|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500217|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "738497a5cc61cbad", "measure_id": "200500217", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Sunnyvale Municipal Code be amended to increase the business license tax, which supports basic City services, from its current amount of $10 for every 5 employees/rental units, to $30 for 1, $50 for 2 to 5, and $50 for each additional group of 5 employees/rental units, up to $9,500 for employees and $4,250 for rentals, with increases phased over 3 years and both tax/cap adjusted annually for inflation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14916, "no_votes": 11618, "total_votes": 26534, "percent_yes": 56.2146679731665, "percent_no": 43.7853320268335, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.660402", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.574531", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sunnyvale Municipal Code be amended to increase the business license tax, which supports basic City services, from its current amount of $10 for every 5 employees/rental units, to $30 for 1, $50 for 2 to 5, and $50 for each additional group of 5 employees/rental units, up to $9,500 for employees and $4,250 for rentals, with increases phased over 3 years and both tax/cap adjusted annually for inflation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8214, "fingerprint": "2005|200500218|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500218|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "048068a462dc3ee5", "measure_id": "200500218", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Sunnyvale Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax (commonly called the \"hotel tax\") which is charged only on persons who occupy hotel or motel rooms in the City for 30 days or less, from the current 8.5% to 9.5%, over a 2-year period, which is lower that charged in San Jose, Palo Alto, Mountain View, Milpitas and Cupertino, in order to help maintain basic City Services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18555, "no_votes": 8215, "total_votes": 26770, "percent_yes": 69.31266342921181, "percent_no": 30.68733657078819, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.660673", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.574723", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sunnyvale Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax (commonly called the \"hotel tax\") which is charged only on persons who occupy hotel or motel rooms in the City for 30 days or less, from the current 8.5% to 9.5%, over a 2-year period, which is lower that charged in San Jose, Palo Alto, Mountain View, Milpitas and Cupertino, in order to help maintain basic City Services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8215, "fingerprint": "2005|200500219|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500219|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d34b8b05c19d7183", "measure_id": "200500219", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Sunnyvale be amended to standardize term limits for all city boards and commissions to two consecutive four-year terms and eliminate the two-year waiting period before a board of commission member may apply to serve on another board or commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16184, "no_votes": 9722, "total_votes": 25906, "percent_yes": 62.47201420520343, "percent_no": 37.52798579479657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.660955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.574912", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Sunnyvale be amended to standardize term limits for all city boards and commissions to two consecutive four-year terms and eliminate the two-year waiting period before a board of commission member may apply to serve on another board or commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8216, "fingerprint": "2005|200500220|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500220|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d89744152cb8382a", "measure_id": "200500220", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Sunnyvale be amended to conform with state law by eliminating the requirement that the City Manager shall reside in the City of Sunnyvale?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11973, "no_votes": 14371, "total_votes": 26344, "percent_yes": 45.44867901609474, "percent_no": 54.55132098390526, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.661222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.575110", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Sunnyvale be amended to conform with state law by eliminating the requirement that the City Manager shall reside in the City of Sunnyvale?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8217, "fingerprint": "2005|200500221|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500221|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ccd09e18ab9f9ecd", "measure_id": "200500221", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Sunnyvale be amended to include the term \"heritage resource\" in its list of topics reviewed by the Sunnyvale Heritage Preservation Commission, consistent with existing policy?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17175, "no_votes": 7795, "total_votes": 24970, "percent_yes": 68.78253904685623, "percent_no": 31.21746095314377, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.661490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.575302", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Sunnyvale be amended to include the term \"heritage resource\" in its list of topics reviewed by the Sunnyvale Heritage Preservation Commission, consistent with existing policy?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8222, "fingerprint": "2005|200500284|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500284|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "7c4a5923d06c898c", "measure_id": "200500284", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "High School Funding Renewal. To provide continued funding to retain quality teachers, credentialed librarians, academic and career counseling programs, and counselors for at-risk youth, shall the High School District of the Santa Cruz City Schools renew without increase its existing assessment of $28/year per parcel for seven years, beginning July 1, 2006, exempting parcels owned/occupied by seniors (65+), with independent community oversight and accountability to ensure funds are used only to improve student learning?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30483, "no_votes": 9136, "total_votes": 39619, "percent_yes": 76.94035689946743, "percent_no": 23.05964310053257, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.663172", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.576268", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "High School Funding Renewal. To provide continued funding to retain quality teachers, credentialed librarians, academic and career counseling programs, and counselors for at-risk youth, shall the High School District of the Santa Cruz City Schools renew without increase its existing assessment of $28/year per parcel for seven years, beginning July 1, 2006, exempting parcels owned/occupied by seniors (65+), with independent community oversight and accountability to ensure funds are used only to improve student learning?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8221, "fingerprint": "2005|200500283|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500283|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "4446526144198a21", "measure_id": "200500283", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Elementary School Funding Renewal. To provide continued funding to retain quality teachers, art and music programs, credentialed librarians and counselors for at-risk youth and students with academic needs, shall the Elementary District of Santa Cruz City Schools renew without increase its existing assessment of $70/year per parcel for seven years, beginning July 1, 2006, exempting parcels owned/occupied by seniors (65+), with independent community oversight and accountability to ensure funds are used only to improve student learning?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16734, "no_votes": 4165, "total_votes": 20899, "percent_yes": 80.07081678549213, "percent_no": 19.929183214507873, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.662760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.576076", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Elementary School Funding Renewal. To provide continued funding to retain quality teachers, art and music programs, credentialed librarians and counselors for at-risk youth and students with academic needs, shall the Elementary District of Santa Cruz City Schools renew without increase its existing assessment of $70/year per parcel for seven years, beginning July 1, 2006, exempting parcels owned/occupied by seniors (65+), with independent community oversight and accountability to ensure funds are used only to improve student learning?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8220, "fingerprint": "2005|200500222|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500222|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "4d803136ee17c12c", "measure_id": "200500222", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "City of Scotts Valley. Shall a five year temporary one-half of one percent sales tax rate increase be approved for the first three year period and then reduced to one-quarter of one percent for the final two years be adopted to maintain general services including public safety, street improvements, and parks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3033, "no_votes": 1209, "total_votes": 4242, "percent_yes": 71.49929278642149, "percent_no": 28.500707213578508, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.662405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.575885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Scotts Valley. Shall a five year temporary one-half of one percent sales tax rate increase be approved for the first three year period and then reduced to one-quarter of one percent for the final two years be adopted to maintain general services including public safety, street improvements, and parks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8218, "fingerprint": "2005|200500086|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500086|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "88efd57f4e5edcdd", "measure_id": "200500086", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Special Tax to Support Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Facilities in County Service Area No. 11, McGregor Community Zone of Benefit. Shall the County of Santa Cruz be authorized to acquire and develop the McGregor Property for park property, and to operate and maintain such park property to the extent funds are available, for children, adults, and seniors in County Service Area No. 11, McGregor Community Zone of Benefit, by levying a special tax of $98.00 per residential unit effective July 1, 2005 through June 20, 2035?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 708, "no_votes": 421, "total_votes": 1129, "percent_yes": 62.71036315323295, "percent_no": 37.28963684676705, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-05-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.661761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.575494", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Special Tax to Support Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Facilities in County Service Area No. 11, McGregor Community Zone of Benefit. Shall the County of Santa Cruz be authorized to acquire and develop the McGregor Property for park property, and to operate and maintain such park property to the extent funds are available, for children, adults, and seniors in County Service Area No. 11, McGregor Community Zone of Benefit, by levying a special tax of $98.00 per residential unit effective July 1, 2005 through June 20, 2035?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8219, "fingerprint": "2005|200500120|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500120|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "b07354054bb2462e", "measure_id": "200500120", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to limit further reductions in the City's General Fund, shall the Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended to add a Chapter imposing a Franchise Tax of 3% on the water utility rate, 3% on the sewer utility rate, and 12% on the refuse utility rate, to replace that comparable Franchise Fee that was recently discontinued?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7050, "no_votes": 5037, "total_votes": 12087, "percent_yes": 58.32712831968231, "percent_no": 41.67287168031769, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-08-30", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.662077", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.575688", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to limit further reductions in the City's General Fund, shall the Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended to add a Chapter imposing a Franchise Tax of 3% on the water utility rate, 3% on the sewer utility rate, and 12% on the refuse utility rate, to replace that comparable Franchise Fee that was recently discontinued?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8223, "fingerprint": "2005|200500285|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500285|SHASTA", "content_hash": "b099e8115d509f7c", "measure_id": "200500285", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To train and prepare students for jobs, careers and transfer to four-year universities, expand nursing, medical training, fire science and technology skills programs: Build/renovate libraries, classrooms for healthcare, science, computer/job training programs; Acquire, construct, modernize and equip facilities, Repair, upgrade deteriorating classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, electrical systems; Shall Siskiyou Joint Community College District qualify for State matching funds, and issue $31,400,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72, "no_votes": 34, "total_votes": 106, "percent_yes": 67.9245283018868, "percent_no": 32.075471698113205, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.663621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.576459", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To train and prepare students for jobs, careers and transfer to four-year universities, expand nursing, medical training, fire science and technology skills programs: Build/renovate libraries, classrooms for healthcare, science, computer/job training programs; Acquire, construct, modernize and equip facilities, Repair, upgrade deteriorating classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, electrical systems; Shall Siskiyou Joint Community College District qualify for State matching funds, and issue $31,400,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8224, "fingerprint": "2005|200500152|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500152|SIERRA", "content_hash": "7eee5cd71075a09e", "measure_id": "200500152", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Sierra County Transient Occupancy Tax be applied to federally owned campgrounds and other properties that are occupied for transient lodging, as provided for in Sierra County Ordinance 967?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 832, "no_votes": 564, "total_votes": 1396, "percent_yes": 59.59885386819485, "percent_no": 40.40114613180515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.663926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.576652", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sierra County Transient Occupancy Tax be applied to federally owned campgrounds and other properties that are occupied for transient lodging, as provided for in Sierra County Ordinance 967?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8225, "fingerprint": "2005|200500286|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500286|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "ad684aa3dd5dfa83", "measure_id": "200500286", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To train and prepare students for jobs, careers and transfer to four year universities, expand nursing, medical training, fire science and technology skill programs: (1) Build/renovate libraries, classrooms for healthcare, science, computer/job training programs; (2) Acquire construct, modernize and equip facilities; (3) Repair, upgrade deteriorating classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, electrical systems, shall Siskiyou Joint Community College District qualify for State matching funds, and issue $31,400,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8840, "no_votes": 5321, "total_votes": 14161, "percent_yes": 62.42496998799519, "percent_no": 37.57503001200481, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.664222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.576840", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To train and prepare students for jobs, careers and transfer to four year universities, expand nursing, medical training, fire science and technology skill programs: (1) Build/renovate libraries, classrooms for healthcare, science, computer/job training programs; (2) Acquire construct, modernize and equip facilities; (3) Repair, upgrade deteriorating classrooms, restrooms, plumbing, electrical systems, shall Siskiyou Joint Community College District qualify for State matching funds, and issue $31,400,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8226, "fingerprint": "2005|200500223|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500223|SOLANO", "content_hash": "add6fc85a208f11e", "measure_id": "200500223", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve the safety of Fairfield and preserve the funding of essential services such as police, fire, street and park maintenance, as well as other general city services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City sales tax by one-half cent, subject to independent annual financial audits, an independent Fairfield taxpayer's committee to review expenditures, and an expiration date of June 30, 2016?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9355, "no_votes": 11252, "total_votes": 20607, "percent_yes": 45.397195127869175, "percent_no": 54.602804872130825, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.664502", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.577034", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the safety of Fairfield and preserve the funding of essential services such as police, fire, street and park maintenance, as well as other general city services, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City sales tax by one-half cent, subject to independent annual financial audits, an independent Fairfield taxpayer's committee to review expenditures, and an expiration date of June 30, 2016?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8228, "fingerprint": "2005|200500287|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500287|SOLANO", "content_hash": "6ba3756e1fabc6f6", "measure_id": "200500287", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Vacaville Unified School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9161, "no_votes": 7847, "total_votes": 17008, "percent_yes": 53.86288805268109, "percent_no": 46.13711194731891, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.665048", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.577418", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Vacaville Unified School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8227, "fingerprint": "2005|200500224|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500224|SOLANO", "content_hash": "40cbb42b6e439798", "measure_id": "200500224", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to comply with a recent court decision interpreting the Right to Vote on Taxes Act, shall the City of Vacaville replace its existing in-lieu franchise fee and property tax fee on City water and sewer operations with an equivalent general tax on City water and sewer operations to avoid reductions in City services such as police services, fire and medical emergency response, street lighting, street and park maintenance, and programs for youth and seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10688, "no_votes": 9229, "total_votes": 19917, "percent_yes": 53.6627002058543, "percent_no": 46.3372997941457, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.664777", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.577225", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to comply with a recent court decision interpreting the Right to Vote on Taxes Act, shall the City of Vacaville replace its existing in-lieu franchise fee and property tax fee on City water and sewer operations with an equivalent general tax on City water and sewer operations to avoid reductions in City services such as police services, fire and medical emergency response, street lighting, street and park maintenance, and programs for youth and seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8229, "fingerprint": "2005|200500045|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500045|SONOMA", "content_hash": "11945c8e989576d0", "measure_id": "200500045", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Quality Public Education Preservation Act of 2005. To maintain and improve high quality local education by: Attracting and retaining quality teachers and staff; enhancing literacy and reading instruction; improving science and math programs; maintaining library services, shall Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District levy an annual parcel tax of $97.00 for 4 years only, with independent community fiscal oversight, annual audits, exemptions for seniors, and no funds used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6500, "no_votes": 3289, "total_votes": 9789, "percent_yes": 66.40106241699867, "percent_no": 33.59893758300133, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.665384", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.577613", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Quality Public Education Preservation Act of 2005. To maintain and improve high quality local education by: Attracting and retaining quality teachers and staff; enhancing literacy and reading instruction; improving science and math programs; maintaining library services, shall Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District levy an annual parcel tax of $97.00 for 4 years only, with independent community fiscal oversight, annual audits, exemptions for seniors, and no funds used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8238, "fingerprint": "2005|200500054|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500054|SONOMA", "content_hash": "6c422b31d826d507", "measure_id": "200500054", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds to reduce class sizes, restore electives, and increase funding for technology, crisis counseling, libraries and school safety; restore funding for equipment and materials for fine and performing arts and sciences, shall West Sonoma County Union High School District be authorized to renew and increase its existing qualified special tax at a cost of $26.00 per parcel for eight years beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9118, "no_votes": 4786, "total_votes": 13904, "percent_yes": 65.57825086306099, "percent_no": 34.42174913693901, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.667911", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.579360", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds to reduce class sizes, restore electives, and increase funding for technology, crisis counseling, libraries and school safety; restore funding for equipment and materials for fine and performing arts and sciences, shall West Sonoma County Union High School District be authorized to renew and increase its existing qualified special tax at a cost of $26.00 per parcel for eight years beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8230, "fingerprint": "2005|200500046|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500046|SONOMA", "content_hash": "bf11203307fcf783", "measure_id": "200500046", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds to reduce class size, restore classroom music and art instruction, and provide counseling and student support services, shall the Forestville Union School District be authorized to renew and increase its existing qualified special tax at a cost of $76.34 per parcel for eight years beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1325, "no_votes": 777, "total_votes": 2102, "percent_yes": 63.03520456707897, "percent_no": 36.96479543292103, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.665664", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.577808", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds to reduce class size, restore classroom music and art instruction, and provide counseling and student support services, shall the Forestville Union School District be authorized to renew and increase its existing qualified special tax at a cost of $76.34 per parcel for eight years beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8231, "fingerprint": "2005|200500047|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500047|SONOMA", "content_hash": "7a993ce1f3946d50", "measure_id": "200500047", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to provide our students with courses in music and art, technology, foreign language instruction, and library services, all essential for student growth and development, shall the Gravenstein Union School District be authorized to replace and extend its existing parcel tax of $36 per year with an annual parcel tax of $52 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1004, "no_votes": 698, "total_votes": 1702, "percent_yes": 58.98942420681552, "percent_no": 41.01057579318448, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.665939", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.578000", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to provide our students with courses in music and art, technology, foreign language instruction, and library services, all essential for student growth and development, shall the Gravenstein Union School District be authorized to replace and extend its existing parcel tax of $36 per year with an annual parcel tax of $52 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8232, "fingerprint": "2005|200500048|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500048|SONOMA", "content_hash": "be93357cd91d8811", "measure_id": "200500048", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve a high quality education in our local school which supports every child by sustaining appropriate class sizes, library services, technology and the arts, shall the Harmony Union School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $52 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 825, "no_votes": 507, "total_votes": 1332, "percent_yes": 61.93693693693694, "percent_no": 38.06306306306306, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.666209", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.578198", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve a high quality education in our local school which supports every child by sustaining appropriate class sizes, library services, technology and the arts, shall the Harmony Union School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $52 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8233, "fingerprint": "2005|200500049|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500049|SONOMA", "content_hash": "6a64a2db08e11cf8", "measure_id": "200500049", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to provide our students with courses in art, music, drama, and foreign language, all essential for student growth and development, shall the Oak Grove Union School District by authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $52 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2005, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 926, "no_votes": 581, "total_votes": 1507, "percent_yes": 61.44658261446583, "percent_no": 38.55341738553417, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.666477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.578390", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to provide our students with courses in art, music, drama, and foreign language, all essential for student growth and development, shall the Oak Grove Union School District by authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $52 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2005, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8234, "fingerprint": "2005|200500050|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500050|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f5570ab363681b7a", "measure_id": "200500050", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To keep school libraries open, to restore programs for struggling readers, to restore an enriching music program, and to support small class sizes, shall the Old Adobe Union School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $75 for four years, beginning July 1, 2005, with public review by a citizens' oversight committee, offering exemption to parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3792, "no_votes": 1978, "total_votes": 5770, "percent_yes": 65.71923743500867, "percent_no": 34.280762564991335, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.666826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.578585", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep school libraries open, to restore programs for struggling readers, to restore an enriching music program, and to support small class sizes, shall the Old Adobe Union School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $75 for four years, beginning July 1, 2005, with public review by a citizens' oversight committee, offering exemption to parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8235, "fingerprint": "2005|200500051|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500051|SONOMA", "content_hash": "d55b3bdef9679819", "measure_id": "200500051", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to retain our award winning music program, keep all four school libraries open, maintain and improve the instructional assistant programs and strengthen the computer technology programs shall the Piner-Olivet Union School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $72 per taxable parcel for six years only, beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1640, "no_votes": 1236, "total_votes": 2876, "percent_yes": 57.02364394993046, "percent_no": 42.97635605006954, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.667099", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.578778", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to retain our award winning music program, keep all four school libraries open, maintain and improve the instructional assistant programs and strengthen the computer technology programs shall the Piner-Olivet Union School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $72 per taxable parcel for six years only, beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8236, "fingerprint": "2005|200500052|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500052|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e9b6dd39fc333d00", "measure_id": "200500052", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds to restore educational programs including reading assistance for all students, vocal and instrumental music, library services, art, computer technology and to maintain student counseling services, shall the Sebastopol Union School District be authorized to renew and increase its existing qualified special tax at a cost of $52.00 per parcel for eight years beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2292, "no_votes": 1024, "total_votes": 3316, "percent_yes": 69.11942098914355, "percent_no": 30.88057901085645, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.667371", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.578968", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds to restore educational programs including reading assistance for all students, vocal and instrumental music, library services, art, computer technology and to maintain student counseling services, shall the Sebastopol Union School District be authorized to renew and increase its existing qualified special tax at a cost of $52.00 per parcel for eight years beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8237, "fingerprint": "2005|200500053|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500053|SONOMA", "content_hash": "3464c97553acc658", "measure_id": "200500053", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue to provide our students with courses in the arts and music, as well as technology instruction and instructional materials, all essential for student growth and development, shall the Twin Hills Union School District be authorized an annual parcel tax of $52 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1221, "no_votes": 665, "total_votes": 1886, "percent_yes": 64.74019088016966, "percent_no": 35.25980911983034, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.667643", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.579165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue to provide our students with courses in the arts and music, as well as technology instruction and instructional materials, all essential for student growth and development, shall the Twin Hills Union School District be authorized an annual parcel tax of $52 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8240, "fingerprint": "2005|200500110|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500110|SONOMA", "content_hash": "61024e6dfe366f64", "measure_id": "200500110", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds to reduce class sizes, restore electives, and increase funding for technology, crisis counseling, libraries and school safety, shall West Sonoma County Union High School District be authorized to renew and increase its existing qualified special tax at a cost of $26.00 per parcel for eight years beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and exemption for persons 65 years or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9929, "no_votes": 4847, "total_votes": 14776, "percent_yes": 67.19680563075258, "percent_no": 32.80319436924742, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.668451", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.579741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds to reduce class sizes, restore electives, and increase funding for technology, crisis counseling, libraries and school safety, shall West Sonoma County Union High School District be authorized to renew and increase its existing qualified special tax at a cost of $26.00 per parcel for eight years beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and exemption for persons 65 years or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8239, "fingerprint": "2005|200500109|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500109|SONOMA", "content_hash": "fefb9a127180775d", "measure_id": "200500109", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent elimination of library services, technology, music and the arts, and to maintain adequate staffing, and to provide instructional assistance for math and reading, shall the Harmony Union School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $52 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1124, "no_votes": 512, "total_votes": 1636, "percent_yes": 68.7041564792176, "percent_no": 31.295843520782398, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-06-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.668180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.579550", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent elimination of library services, technology, music and the arts, and to maintain adequate staffing, and to provide instructional assistance for math and reading, shall the Harmony Union School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $52 for eight years, beginning July 1, 2005, with annual audits and an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8241, "fingerprint": "2005|200500153|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500153|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e88fcc62813e1082", "measure_id": "200500153", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the \"Sonoma County Genetically Engineered Organism Nuisance Abatement Ordinance\" which would, for at least for the next ten years: (1) prohibit the raising, growing, propagation, cultivation, sale, or distribution of most genetically engineered organisms; (2) require the Sonoma County Agricultural Commissioner to enforce the ordinance by, after a hearing, confiscating and destroying the genetically engineered organisms; and (3) provide for fines for each violation, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73670, "no_votes": 90658, "total_votes": 164328, "percent_yes": 44.83106956818071, "percent_no": 55.16893043181929, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.668793", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.579937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \"Sonoma County Genetically Engineered Organism Nuisance Abatement Ordinance\" which would, for at least for the next ten years: (1) prohibit the raising, growing, propagation, cultivation, sale, or distribution of most genetically engineered organisms; (2) require the Sonoma County Agricultural Commissioner to enforce the ordinance by, after a hearing, confiscating and destroying the genetically engineered organisms; and (3) provide for fines for each violation, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8242, "fingerprint": "2005|200500055|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500055|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "2d1a67e4cde5acfa", "measure_id": "200500055", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education shall Keyes Union School District acquire, construct and improve facilites including completing Sprating Middle School by building gymnasium and multipurpose buildings, modernizing Keyes Elementary by making needed plumbing and restroom renovations, upgrading playgrounds, improving health and safety, upgrading electrical systems to improves modern technology, and make the District eligible to receive over $1,000,000 in State grants by issuing $5,000,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates and NO money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 392, "no_votes": 140, "total_votes": 532, "percent_yes": 73.68421052631578, "percent_no": 26.31578947368422, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.669067", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.580129", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education shall Keyes Union School District acquire, construct and improve facilites including completing Sprating Middle School by building gymnasium and multipurpose buildings, modernizing Keyes Elementary by making needed plumbing and restroom renovations, upgrading playgrounds, improving health and safety, upgrading electrical systems to improves modern technology, and make the District eligible to receive over $1,000,000 in State grants by issuing $5,000,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates and NO money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8244, "fingerprint": "2005|200500288|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500288|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "3431746f0049e2b3", "measure_id": "200500288", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety by repairing and renovating aging roofs, electrical and plumbing systems and other aging District infrastructure, and to ease student overcrowding by paying off an outstanding loan to complete construction, shall the Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District be authorized to issue $1.5 million bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 869, "no_votes": 891, "total_votes": 1760, "percent_yes": 49.375, "percent_no": 50.625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.669628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.580517", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety by repairing and renovating aging roofs, electrical and plumbing systems and other aging District infrastructure, and to ease student overcrowding by paying off an outstanding loan to complete construction, shall the Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District be authorized to issue $1.5 million bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8245, "fingerprint": "2005|200500289|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500289|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "51c8a64ab0fd86bd", "measure_id": "200500289", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Riverbank Unified School District be authorized to renovate outdated restrooms and plumbing systems, make health and safety improvements, construct a new elementary school to relieve student overcrowding, modernize deteriorating classrooms and libraries, construct new science labs, and make the district eleigible to recieve $5,800,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $15,200,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1584, "no_votes": 842, "total_votes": 2426, "percent_yes": 65.2926628194559, "percent_no": 34.7073371805441, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.669900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.580711", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Riverbank Unified School District be authorized to renovate outdated restrooms and plumbing systems, make health and safety improvements, construct a new elementary school to relieve student overcrowding, modernize deteriorating classrooms and libraries, construct new science labs, and make the district eleigible to recieve $5,800,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $15,200,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8243, "fingerprint": "2005|200500225|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500225|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "ad3431fbf42ff083", "measure_id": "200500225", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance, creating Public Safety and City Street Improvement Act and imposing a 1/2 cent sales tax for 20 years and create a Citizens Advisory Oversight Committee, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 670, "no_votes": 595, "total_votes": 1265, "percent_yes": 52.96442687747036, "percent_no": 47.03557312252964, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.669339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.580324", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance, creating Public Safety and City Street Improvement Act and imposing a 1/2 cent sales tax for 20 years and create a Citizens Advisory Oversight Committee, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8246, "fingerprint": "2005|200500002|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500002|SUTTER", "content_hash": "77cfe7a2a8f44a6b", "measure_id": "200500002", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Yuba City Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 1 Be authorized to levy a special tax at the rate and apportioned as described in Resolution No.BR-0405-015 adopted by the governing Board of the Yuba City Unified School District on July 27,2004, which resolution is Incorporated herein in by reference, within the territory identified on the map Entitled \"Annexation Map No. 1 of Community Facilities District No. 1,\" Which map is attached as Exhibit B to Resolution No. BR-0405-024.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6, "no_votes": 85, "total_votes": 91, "percent_yes": 6.5934065934065895, "percent_no": 93.40659340659342, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-01-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.670245", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.580906", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Yuba City Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 1 Be authorized to levy a special tax at the rate and apportioned as described in Resolution No.BR-0405-015 adopted by the governing Board of the Yuba City Unified School District on July 27,2004, which resolution is Incorporated herein in by reference, within the territory identified on the map Entitled \"Annexation Map No. 1 of Community Facilities District No. 1,\" Which map is attached as Exhibit B to Resolution No. BR-0405-024.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8247, "fingerprint": "2005|200500033|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500033|SUTTER", "content_hash": "ab1a39261644d972", "measure_id": "200500033", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Live Oak Ordinance No.482 be adopted, which imposes an excise tax (subject to certain exemptions) on persons issued a building permit for each new construction in the amount of one percent of the valuation of construction work under the permit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 321, "no_votes": 145, "total_votes": 466, "percent_yes": 68.88412017167383, "percent_no": 31.11587982832617, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.670580", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.581098", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Live Oak Ordinance No.482 be adopted, which imposes an excise tax (subject to certain exemptions) on persons issued a building permit for each new construction in the amount of one percent of the valuation of construction work under the permit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1165, "fingerprint": "2005|CA1143|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|CA1143|Statewide", "content_hash": "71b348808981abe6", "measure_id": "CA1143", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 73", "description": "Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor's Pregnancy. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.40000153, "percent_no": 52.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Abortion\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to require a 48-h...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to require a 48-hour waiting period and parental notification before a minor could obtain an abortion. The measure failed with 47.4% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 73", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_73_(2005)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2005/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2005", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2073%202005", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2073%202005", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1164, "fingerprint": "2005|CA1142|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|CA1142|Statewide", "content_hash": "b46a7254f2098bda", "measure_id": "CA1142", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 75", "description": "Public Employee Union Dues. Restrictions on Political Contributions. Employee Consent Requirement. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.5, "percent_no": 53.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required public employee unions to obtain annual writ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required public employee unions to obtain annual written consent from members before using their dues for political contributions, and prohibited unions from using dues for political purposes without such consent. It would have applied to state and local government employee unions but not private sector unions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 75", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_75_(2005)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2005/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2005", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2075%202005", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2075%202005", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1163, "fingerprint": "2005|CA1141|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|CA1141|Statewide", "content_hash": "85aba39c42bcc966", "measure_id": "CA1141", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 74", "description": "Public School Teachers. Waiting Period for Permanent Status. Dismissal. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.90000153, "percent_no": 55.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have extended the probationary period for public school te...", "summary_text": "This measure would have extended the probationary period for public school teachers from two years to five years before they could receive permanent employment status (tenure). It also would have made it easier to dismiss teachers with permanent status by changing the process and standards for removal.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 74", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_74_(2005)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2005/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2005", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2074%202005", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2074%202005", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1162, "fingerprint": "2005|CA1140|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|CA1140|Statewide", "content_hash": "0362e6c3a18f2b48", "measure_id": "CA1140", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 78", "description": "Discounts on Prescription Drugs. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.5, "percent_no": 58.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required pharmaceutical companies to provide discount...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required pharmaceutical companies to provide discounted prescription drugs to low and moderate-income Californians who lack prescription drug coverage, with discounts similar to those given to federal agencies. The program would have been administered by the state and funded through existing resources without new taxes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 78", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_78_(2005)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2005/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2005", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2078%202005", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2078%202005", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1161, "fingerprint": "2005|CA1139|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|CA1139|Statewide", "content_hash": "38beeed1bdc4b6af", "measure_id": "CA1139", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 77", "description": "Redistricting. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.5, "percent_no": 59.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have transferred the responsibility for drawing legislativ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have transferred the responsibility for drawing legislative and congressional district boundaries from the state legislature to a panel of three retired judges appointed by legislative leaders. The judges would have been required to follow specific criteria including respecting geographic boundaries, keeping communities of interest together, and creating compact districts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 77", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_77_(2005)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2005/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2005", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2077%202005", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2077%202005", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1160, "fingerprint": "2005|CA1138|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|CA1138|Statewide", "content_hash": "0fea9521dd1ede44", "measure_id": "CA1138", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 79", "description": "Prescription Drug Discounts. State-Negotiated Rebates. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.90000153, "percent_no": 61.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required the state to negotiate discounts on prescrip...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required the state to negotiate discounts on prescription drugs for California residents without prescription drug coverage and established a state program to distribute those discounted medications. The initiative would have created a new state agency to negotiate rebates with pharmaceutical companies and operate the discount program.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 79", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_79_(2005)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2005/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2005", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2079%202005", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2079%202005", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1159, "fingerprint": "2005|CA1137|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|CA1137|Statewide", "content_hash": "34fafca3071174b3", "measure_id": "CA1137", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 76", "description": "State Spending and School Funding Limits. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.90000153, "percent_no": 62.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established constitutional spending limits for the st...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established constitutional spending limits for the state government and required a portion of state revenues to be set aside for K-14 education funding. It also would have created mechanisms for suspending the spending limits during fiscal emergencies declared by the governor and legislature.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 76", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_76_(2005)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2005/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2005", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2076%202005", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2076%202005", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1158, "fingerprint": "2005|CA1136|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|CA1136|Statewide", "content_hash": "01bc980383eb9f4e", "measure_id": "CA1136", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 80", "description": "Electric Service Providers. Regulation. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.29999924, "percent_no": 65.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Environmental Protection\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed private companies to compete with existing ut...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed private companies to compete with existing utility companies in providing electricity service to customers, requiring the state to regulate these new electric service providers. It would have given customers the option to choose their electricity supplier while maintaining the existing utility infrastructure for delivery.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 80", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_80_(2005)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2005/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2005", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2080%202005", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2080%202005", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 8248, "fingerprint": "2005|200500154|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500154|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "a3f1056ebfce50ac", "measure_id": "200500154", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended, effective January 8, 2007 to: (1) separate the elected office of Tehama County Public Administrator from elected offices of Sheriff and Corner; (2) make the office of Tehama County Public Administrator an appointed office; and (3) consolidate the office of Tehama County Public Administrator with the office of Tehama County Public Guardian?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8673, "no_votes": 6323, "total_votes": 14996, "percent_yes": 57.83542277940784, "percent_no": 42.16457722059216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.670852", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.581287", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended, effective January 8, 2007 to: (1) separate the elected office of Tehama County Public Administrator from elected offices of Sheriff and Corner; (2) make the office of Tehama County Public Administrator an appointed office; and (3) consolidate the office of Tehama County Public Administrator with the office of Tehama County Public Guardian?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8251, "fingerprint": "2005|200500056|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500056|TULARE", "content_hash": "9c3f1d7b5f3c6a4b", "measure_id": "200500056", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For all schools, to provide funds not otherwise available for the athletic facility improvements, repainting of the campus, fencing, irrigation and well improvements for the baseball field, salary and benefits of additional maintenance employees, shall the Woodlake Union High School District be authorized to collect an annual qualified special tax of $50 per taxable parcel beginning July 1, 2005, for a period of seven years, and with all expenditures monitored by an independent oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 417, "no_votes": 781, "total_votes": 1198, "percent_yes": 34.80801335559265, "percent_no": 65.19198664440735, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-03-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.705755", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.581869", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For all schools, to provide funds not otherwise available for the athletic facility improvements, repainting of the campus, fencing, irrigation and well improvements for the baseball field, salary and benefits of additional maintenance employees, shall the Woodlake Union High School District be authorized to collect an annual qualified special tax of $50 per taxable parcel beginning July 1, 2005, for a period of seven years, and with all expenditures monitored by an independent oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8257, "fingerprint": "2005|200500290|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500290|TULARE", "content_hash": "317540b6da23d15f", "measure_id": "200500290", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms and facilities throughout the District and to make the District issue $55 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and not transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 601, "no_votes": 207, "total_votes": 808, "percent_yes": 74.38118811881188, "percent_no": 25.618811881188122, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.707556", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.583033", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve student overcrowding by building new classrooms and facilities throughout the District and to make the District issue $55 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and not transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8258, "fingerprint": "2005|200500291|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500291|TULARE", "content_hash": "60ac891f6a3cd0db", "measure_id": "200500291", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Kings River Union School District: Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building, or a science lab and/or library, and by issuing $850,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 300, "no_votes": 157, "total_votes": 457, "percent_yes": 65.64551422319475, "percent_no": 34.35448577680525, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.707825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.583224", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Kings River Union School District: Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building, or a science lab and/or library, and by issuing $850,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8253, "fingerprint": "2005|200500226|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500226|TULARE", "content_hash": "746d94c25f4eec86", "measure_id": "200500226", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Dinuba Police, Fire, Emergency Response/ 9-1-1 Safety Measure. In order to hire, train and retain police/firefighters/paramedics/9-1-1 dispatchers; expand neighborhood/school policing and crime prevention efforts including more after-school, anti-gang and anti-drug programs; upgrade the 9-1-1 Emergency Response Center; and purchase fire engines/ambulances, shall the sales tax be increased by three-quarters of a cent with citizens oversight, guaranteed independent annual financial audits, 10-year reviews, and no money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1776, "no_votes": 630, "total_votes": 2406, "percent_yes": 73.81546134663341, "percent_no": 26.184538653366587, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.706413", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.582257", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Dinuba Police, Fire, Emergency Response/ 9-1-1 Safety Measure. In order to hire, train and retain police/firefighters/paramedics/9-1-1 dispatchers; expand neighborhood/school policing and crime prevention efforts including more after-school, anti-gang and anti-drug programs; upgrade the 9-1-1 Emergency Response Center; and purchase fire engines/ambulances, shall the sales tax be increased by three-quarters of a cent with citizens oversight, guaranteed independent annual financial audits, 10-year reviews, and no money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8254, "fingerprint": "2005|200500227|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500227|TULARE", "content_hash": "355c5d503bcc8c48", "measure_id": "200500227", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Farmersville voters enact a 4% utility users tax to restore and ensure essential government functions including animal control, police, fire, park facilities maintenance, and other general fund services continue in the future?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 400, "no_votes": 468, "total_votes": 868, "percent_yes": 46.08294930875576, "percent_no": 53.91705069124424, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.706693", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.582458", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Farmersville voters enact a 4% utility users tax to restore and ensure essential government functions including animal control, police, fire, park facilities maintenance, and other general fund services continue in the future?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8255, "fingerprint": "2005|200500228|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500228|TULARE", "content_hash": "2a29df323ad1e15d", "measure_id": "200500228", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Porterville Police, Fire and Emergency Response/ 9-1-1 Safety Measure. In order to increase the number of police and firefighters, expand neighborhood crime prevention efforts, improve 9-1-1 dispatch center, build a new fire station, and expand and improve anti-gang, anti-gang and anti-bullying programs, shall the sales tax be increased by one-half cent with citizens oversight and independent annual performance and financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4362, "no_votes": 1845, "total_votes": 6207, "percent_yes": 70.27549540840987, "percent_no": 29.724504591590133, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.706967", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.582651", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Porterville Police, Fire and Emergency Response/ 9-1-1 Safety Measure. In order to increase the number of police and firefighters, expand neighborhood crime prevention efforts, improve 9-1-1 dispatch center, build a new fire station, and expand and improve anti-gang, anti-gang and anti-bullying programs, shall the sales tax be increased by one-half cent with citizens oversight and independent annual performance and financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8256, "fingerprint": "2005|200500229|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500229|TULARE", "content_hash": "43ac8863200a1dad", "measure_id": "200500229", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The Tulare Vital City Services Measure. To maintain and improve vital city services such as Police, Fire, and paramedic services, 911 response times, anti-gang programs, street and pothole repair, parks, recreation, library, tree trimming, code enforcement and other services, shall the sales tax be increased by a maximum of one-half of a cent with citizens' oversight and independent annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5285, "no_votes": 2130, "total_votes": 7415, "percent_yes": 71.27444369521241, "percent_no": 28.725556304787588, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.707256", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.582842", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The Tulare Vital City Services Measure. To maintain and improve vital city services such as Police, Fire, and paramedic services, 911 response times, anti-gang programs, street and pothole repair, parks, recreation, library, tree trimming, code enforcement and other services, shall the sales tax be increased by a maximum of one-half of a cent with citizens' oversight and independent annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8252, "fingerprint": "2005|200500155|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500155|TULARE", "content_hash": "9ad6f93140c84de6", "measure_id": "200500155", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Ponderosa Community Services District Snow Removal Measure. Shall the Ponderosa Community Service be permitted to increase, on an annual basis starting in the 2006-2007 fiscal year, the annual snow removal fee paid by each District property owner, in accordance with the Los Angeles Engineering News Record as set forth in the May edition of each year, in order for the District to maintain its ability to continue to provide and maintain snow removal service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 29, "percent_yes": 68.96551724137932, "percent_no": 31.034482758620683, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.706089", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.582065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Ponderosa Community Services District Snow Removal Measure. Shall the Ponderosa Community Service be permitted to increase, on an annual basis starting in the 2006-2007 fiscal year, the annual snow removal fee paid by each District property owner, in accordance with the Los Angeles Engineering News Record as set forth in the May edition of each year, in order for the District to maintain its ability to continue to provide and maintain snow removal service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8259, "fingerprint": "2005|200500292|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500292|TULARE", "content_hash": "1c0f6531e47ff5bf", "measure_id": "200500292", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including Football Bowl upgrades and improvements; Old Gym upgrades and improvements; added parking; landscape beautification, softball field upgrades and improvements, upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields; and Little Theater upgrades and improvements, shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and sell up to $7,000,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 436, "no_votes": 245, "total_votes": 681, "percent_yes": 64.02349486049927, "percent_no": 35.97650513950073, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.708146", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.583420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To raise money for improvement projects at Kingsburg High School, including Football Bowl upgrades and improvements; Old Gym upgrades and improvements; added parking; landscape beautification, softball field upgrades and improvements, upgrades and improvements on other athletic fields; and Little Theater upgrades and improvements, shall Kingsburg Joint Union High School District issue and sell up to $7,000,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8249, "fingerprint": "2005|200500156|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500156|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "91d4d2b3859511e1", "measure_id": "200500156", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TOULUMNE Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the order adopted June 27, 2005 by Local Agency Formation Commission Tuolumne County Ordering formation of Tuolumne County Resource Conservation District, funded by grants, donations, and fees for service, to manage conservation projects including soil/water conservation projects, wildlife habitat enhancement, weed control, watershed restoration, conservation planning, forest and rangeland stewardship, and education be approved, subject to the terms and conditions specified in  the order, including nine Directors appointed by the Board of Supervisors and the City Council?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10594, "no_votes": 7424, "total_votes": 18018, "percent_yes": 58.796758796758795, "percent_no": 41.203241203241205, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure approved the formation of the Tuolumne County Resource Conservat...", "summary_text": "This measure approved the formation of the Tuolumne County Resource Conservation District to manage various conservation projects including soil and water conservation, wildlife habitat enhancement, weed control, and watershed restoration. The district would be funded through grants, donations, and service fees, with nine directors appointed by the Board of Supervisors and City Council.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.714367", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TOULUMNE Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8250, "fingerprint": "2005|200500293|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500293|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "aeb08bbb36630c28", "measure_id": "200500293", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "TOULUMNE Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Big Oak Flat-Groveland Unified School District be authorized to upgrade and construct classrooms and labs, improve students access to computers and technology, upgrade outdated restrooms, sewer and plumbing systems, make health and safety improvements, renovate electrical systems, replace roofing, and become eligible to receive $4,500,000 in State grants by issuing $9,300,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1563, "no_votes": 722, "total_votes": 2285, "percent_yes": 68.40262582056893, "percent_no": 31.59737417943107, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Big Oak Flat-Groveland Unified School Distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Big Oak Flat-Groveland Unified School District to issue $9,300,000 in bonds to fund facility improvements including classroom and lab construction, technology upgrades, restroom and plumbing system updates, health and safety improvements, electrical system renovations, and roof replacement. The bond issuance would make the district eligible to receive $4,500,000 in state grants and would include provisions for annual audits and citizen oversight.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.714447", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TOULUMNE Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8260, "fingerprint": "2005|200500230|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500230|VENTURA", "content_hash": "1804f86f50ab9f5d", "measure_id": "200500230", "measure_letter": "B5", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance proposing a special tax of $15 per parcel per year, to be used only for maintenance and operations of a community swimming pool be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1861, "no_votes": 932, "total_votes": 2793, "percent_yes": 66.63086287146439, "percent_no": 33.36913712853561, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.708445", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.583613", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance proposing a special tax of $15 per parcel per year, to be used only for maintenance and operations of a community swimming pool be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8261, "fingerprint": "2005|200500231|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500231|VENTURA", "content_hash": "adfb3f47b7849976", "measure_id": "200500231", "measure_letter": "C5", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the city of Fillmore allow the development and construction, with local or state assistance, of very low to moderate income rental housing not to exceed in the aggregate 100 dwelling units?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1190, "no_votes": 1565, "total_votes": 2755, "percent_yes": 43.19419237749546, "percent_no": 56.80580762250454, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.708719", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.583808", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city of Fillmore allow the development and construction, with local or state assistance, of very low to moderate income rental housing not to exceed in the aggregate 100 dwelling units?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8262, "fingerprint": "2005|200500232|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500232|VENTURA", "content_hash": "4ca4afeb832f2c65", "measure_id": "200500232", "measure_letter": "D5", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the San Buenaventura Municipal Code be amended to impose a tax on the privilege of lawfully operating a cardroom pursuant to a city cardroom license in amount equal to 15% of the gross revenues received by the license holder from card play, all as more particularly set forth in the proposed ordinance attached as an exhibit to City Council Resolution No. 2005-068 on file in the City Clerk's Office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13739, "no_votes": 6144, "total_votes": 19883, "percent_yes": 69.09923049841574, "percent_no": 30.900769501584264, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.708987", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.583999", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the San Buenaventura Municipal Code be amended to impose a tax on the privilege of lawfully operating a cardroom pursuant to a city cardroom license in amount equal to 15% of the gross revenues received by the license holder from card play, all as more particularly set forth in the proposed ordinance attached as an exhibit to City Council Resolution No. 2005-068 on file in the City Clerk's Office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8263, "fingerprint": "2005|200500294|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500294|VENTURA", "content_hash": "a795c549534de252", "measure_id": "200500294", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve school overcrowding, improve school safety and provide facilities that best serve the students and community, shall the El Tejon Unified School District replace portable classrooms that are currently 57%, or 39 instructional class rooms, of the school district with equipped permanent classrooms, and build a multipurpose facility at Frazier Park Elementary School, construct and equip a new elementary school by issuing $7.120 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48, "no_votes": 38, "total_votes": 86, "percent_yes": 55.81395348837209, "percent_no": 44.18604651162791, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.709256", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.584190", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve school overcrowding, improve school safety and provide facilities that best serve the students and community, shall the El Tejon Unified School District replace portable classrooms that are currently 57%, or 39 instructional class rooms, of the school district with equipped permanent classrooms, and build a multipurpose facility at Frazier Park Elementary School, construct and equip a new elementary school by issuing $7.120 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8264, "fingerprint": "2005|200500233|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500233|YOLO", "content_hash": "324976691011a0a2", "measure_id": "200500233", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall amended Resolution No. 05-96, amending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designations for the Covell Village property from agriculture to residential and commercial uses, as set forth in the Resolution and establishing the Baseline Project Features for development of the Covell Village Project be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8843, "no_votes": 12578, "total_votes": 21421, "percent_yes": 41.28191961159609, "percent_no": 58.71808038840391, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.709522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.584385", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall amended Resolution No. 05-96, amending the Davis General Plan to change the land use designations for the Covell Village property from agriculture to residential and commercial uses, as set forth in the Resolution and establishing the Baseline Project Features for development of the Covell Village Project be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8265, "fingerprint": "2005|200500157|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2005|200500157|YUBA", "content_hash": "1f9f9a454ed949d2", "measure_id": "200500157", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2005, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should a destination resort/hotel and American Indian gaming Casino be located within the sports/entertainment zone on Forty Mile Road in the County of Yuba?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6714, "no_votes": 7308, "total_votes": 14022, "percent_yes": 47.88189987163029, "percent_no": 52.11810012836971, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2005-11-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.709790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.584585", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should a destination resort/hotel and American Indian gaming Casino be located within the sports/entertainment zone on Forty Mile Road in the County of Yuba?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8266, "fingerprint": "2004|200400004|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400004|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f4fa306609c944cf", "measure_id": "200400004", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated throught the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART. (B) New transbay rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network. (D) New expanded ferry service. (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail. (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 164497, "no_votes": 131098, "total_votes": 295595, "percent_yes": 55.64945279859267, "percent_no": 44.35054720140733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.710094", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.584777", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated throught the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART. (B) New transbay rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network. (D) New expanded ferry service. (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail. (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11768, "fingerprint": "2004|200400603|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400603|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c2aff528ad166845", "measure_id": "200400603", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to complete needed school modernization improvements at Marin School and Ocean View School and capture State matching funds for fire and life-safety repairs, emergency communications, roofs, bathrooms, accessibility improvements, and other safety improvements, and for repairs and upgrades to Cougar Field and other playing fields for student and community use, shall Albany Unified School District issue $13,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5879, "no_votes": 1428, "total_votes": 7307, "percent_yes": 80.45709593540441, "percent_no": 19.54290406459559, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.681892", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.722017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.592983", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to complete needed school modernization improvements at Marin School and Ocean View School and capture State matching funds for fire and life-safety repairs, emergency communications, roofs, bathrooms, accessibility improvements, and other safety improvements, and for repairs and upgrades to Cougar Field and other playing fields for student and community use, shall Albany Unified School District issue $13,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8267, "fingerprint": "2004|200400005|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400005|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8389aaec5eab5e4c", "measure_id": "200400005", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide and maintain trauma and emergency medical services throughout Alameda County and to provide primary, preventative and mental health services to indigent, low income and uninsured children, families and seniors, to retain qualified nurses and health care professionals and to prevent closure of county clinics and the Alameda County Medical Center, shall Alameda County implement a half-cent transaction and use tax, with an annual fiscal oversight and review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 214449, "no_votes": 87315, "total_votes": 301764, "percent_yes": 71.0651369944725, "percent_no": 28.934863005527504, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.710596", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.584972", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide and maintain trauma and emergency medical services throughout Alameda County and to provide primary, preventative and mental health services to indigent, low income and uninsured children, families and seniors, to retain qualified nurses and health care professionals and to prevent closure of county clinics and the Alameda County Medical Center, shall Alameda County implement a half-cent transaction and use tax, with an annual fiscal oversight and review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11769, "fingerprint": "2004|200400604|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400604|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3273ccde00f8d6af", "measure_id": "200400604", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect quality education despite reductions in State funding, shall Berkeley Unified School District levy a two year special tax at 9.7c/square foot for Residential Bulidings, 14.7c/square foot for Comerical/Industrial/Institutional bulidings and $50/parcel for unimproved parcels? Funds will be used to improve student achievement, reduce class sizes and enhance libraries, music programs, teacher training and parent involvement. A citizen's oversight committee will monitor that funds are used for identified purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38089, "no_votes": 14669, "total_votes": 52758, "percent_yes": 72.1956859623185, "percent_no": 27.804314037681493, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.682184", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.722372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.593173", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect quality education despite reductions in State funding, shall Berkeley Unified School District levy a two year special tax at 9.7c/square foot for Residential Bulidings, 14.7c/square foot for Comerical/Industrial/Institutional bulidings and $50/parcel for unimproved parcels? Funds will be used to improve student achievement, reduce class sizes and enhance libraries, music programs, teacher training and parent involvement. A citizen's oversight committee will monitor that funds are used for identified purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8279, "fingerprint": "2004|200400130|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400130|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "bb013742cfab0494", "measure_id": "200400130", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Chabot and Las Positas Colleges by: repairing leaky roofs; upgrading fire safety, campus security, plumbing/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for computer technology; removing asbestos; upgrading nursing/paramedics/job training classrooms; repairing, constructing, acquiring, equipping classrooms, labs, sites and facilities; shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District issue $498,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with the guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65155, "no_votes": 45364, "total_votes": 110519, "percent_yes": 58.95366407586026, "percent_no": 41.04633592413974, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.714172", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.587643", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Chabot and Las Positas Colleges by: repairing leaky roofs; upgrading fire safety, campus security, plumbing/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for computer technology; removing asbestos; upgrading nursing/paramedics/job training classrooms; repairing, constructing, acquiring, equipping classrooms, labs, sites and facilities; shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District issue $498,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with the guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11770, "fingerprint": "2004|200400605|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400605|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b25a7ab20b110f28", "measure_id": "200400605", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance educational facilities by replacing/repairing aging electrial, plumbing and air-ventilation systems; modernizing classrooms; developing 21st century information technology improving student safety; devoloping state-of-the-art high school facilities and accommodating growth in student enrollment; qualify for millions in State matching funds; shall Dublin Unified School District issue $184 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits with no bond money used for administrators' and teachers' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9062, "no_votes": 3318, "total_votes": 12380, "percent_yes": 73.19870759289176, "percent_no": 26.801292407108235, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.682513", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.722642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.593363", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance educational facilities by replacing/repairing aging electrial, plumbing and air-ventilation systems; modernizing classrooms; developing 21st century information technology improving student safety; devoloping state-of-the-art high school facilities and accommodating growth in student enrollment; qualify for millions in State matching funds; shall Dublin Unified School District issue $184 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits with no bond money used for administrators' and teachers' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8278, "fingerprint": "2004|200400129|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400129|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9c3588035bae56cb", "measure_id": "200400129", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate aging neighborhood schools, improve student safety conditions, relieve classroom overcrowding, construct, equip, upgrade classrooms, facilities and sites, and qualify for over $17 million in State matching funds, shall the Alameda City Unified School District issue $63 million of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits and citizen oversight, with no proceeds going to the State and all funds remaining in Alamenda to benefit neighborhood schools without increasing existing tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13809, "no_votes": 5396, "total_votes": 19205, "percent_yes": 71.90315022129654, "percent_no": 28.096849778703458, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.713837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.587427", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate aging neighborhood schools, improve student safety conditions, relieve classroom overcrowding, construct, equip, upgrade classrooms, facilities and sites, and qualify for over $17 million in State matching funds, shall the Alameda City Unified School District issue $63 million of bonds at legal rates, with annual audits and citizen oversight, with no proceeds going to the State and all funds remaining in Alamenda to benefit neighborhood schools without increasing existing tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11771, "fingerprint": "2004|200400606|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400606|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8bf428729734de42", "measure_id": "200400606", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education by attracting and retaining qualifed teachers and library staff, implementing smaller class sizes, restoring college and career preparation classes, providing instructors/equipment for science education, restoring high school counselors, and maintaining art/music programs; shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $120 per parcel for 5 years only, with annual audits, independent citizens oversight, and an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons age 65 or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24017, "no_votes": 9516, "total_votes": 33533, "percent_yes": 71.62198431395939, "percent_no": 28.378015686040612, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.682831", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.722913", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.593552", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education by attracting and retaining qualifed teachers and library staff, implementing smaller class sizes, restoring college and career preparation classes, providing instructors/equipment for science education, restoring high school counselors, and maintaining art/music programs; shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $120 per parcel for 5 years only, with annual audits, independent citizens oversight, and an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons age 65 or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8280, "fingerprint": "2004|200400131|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400131|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9218de2e4aa6b72f", "measure_id": "200400131", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education for a growing population; reduce class sizes and expand the availablity of after-school classes and libraries; and to upgrade technology infrastructure and expand student access to computers, shall the Dublin Unified School District levy an annual tax of $180 per parcel for seven years, increasing annually at 2% with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age and over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3673, "no_votes": 2823, "total_votes": 6496, "percent_yes": 56.54248768472906, "percent_no": 43.45751231527094, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.714440", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.587843", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education for a growing population; reduce class sizes and expand the availablity of after-school classes and libraries; and to upgrade technology infrastructure and expand student access to computers, shall the Dublin Unified School District levy an annual tax of $180 per parcel for seven years, increasing annually at 2% with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age and over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8293, "fingerprint": "2004|200400390|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400390|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "62e83b81d9cd3bfc", "measure_id": "200400390", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the current level of police and fire protection services be maintained at a minimum of 94 sworn police officers and a minimum of 7 fire companies by adoption of an ordinance imposing a parcel tax in an annual amount of $78 for single-family residences, $46.80 per multi-family unit and $16 per thousand square feet for industrial and commerical properties, such parcel tax to end after five and one-half years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13392, "no_votes": 13095, "total_votes": 26487, "percent_yes": 50.56065239551478, "percent_no": 49.43934760448522, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.721392", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.592602", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the current level of police and fire protection services be maintained at a minimum of 94 sworn police officers and a minimum of 7 fire companies by adoption of an ordinance imposing a parcel tax in an annual amount of $78 for single-family residences, $46.80 per multi-family unit and $16 per thousand square feet for industrial and commerical properties, such parcel tax to end after five and one-half years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11772, "fingerprint": "2004|200400607|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400607|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "aa924fc5ed14381b", "measure_id": "200400607", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build new science labs, modernize school libraries, replace older portable classrooms, renovate aging schools, improve classroom computers and technology, increase student safety, renovate aging restrooms, and construct, replace, acquire and renovate school facilities and equipment, shall the San Lorenzo Unified School District be authorized to issue $49,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal linit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15797, "no_votes": 5420, "total_votes": 21217, "percent_yes": 74.4544469057831, "percent_no": 25.5455530942169, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.683123", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.723186", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.593745", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build new science labs, modernize school libraries, replace older portable classrooms, renovate aging schools, improve classroom computers and technology, increase student safety, renovate aging restrooms, and construct, replace, acquire and renovate school facilities and equipment, shall the San Lorenzo Unified School District be authorized to issue $49,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal linit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8281, "fingerprint": "2004|200400132|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400132|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ce9246c30715db4a", "measure_id": "200400132", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain qualified credentialed teachers, to maintain elective courses for students needing to qualify for college admission, to purchase textbooks and materials, to maintain libraries, music and art programs, to maintain reduced class sizes, to continue after school academic programs, shall Oakland Unified School District be authorized to increase the existing $123 per year parcel tax by $7 per month to $207 annually for a period of 5 years with no money used for administrative costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60079, "no_votes": 20578, "total_votes": 80657, "percent_yes": 74.48702530468528, "percent_no": 25.512974695314725, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.714731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.588070", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain qualified credentialed teachers, to maintain elective courses for students needing to qualify for college admission, to purchase textbooks and materials, to maintain libraries, music and art programs, to maintain reduced class sizes, to continue after school academic programs, shall Oakland Unified School District be authorized to increase the existing $123 per year parcel tax by $7 per month to $207 annually for a period of 5 years with no money used for administrative costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8294, "fingerprint": "2004|200400391|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400391|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b59fcb2aaa80af63", "measure_id": "200400391", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Leandro Charter be amended to provide for a fixed four-year term of office for Council Members and the Mayor commencing on January 1 following the election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15446, "no_votes": 9760, "total_votes": 25206, "percent_yes": 61.27906054114099, "percent_no": 38.72093945885901, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.721716", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.592794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Leandro Charter be amended to provide for a fixed four-year term of office for Council Members and the Mayor commencing on January 1 following the election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8283, "fingerprint": "2004|200400369|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400369|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7393672afbc5accf", "measure_id": "200400369", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to delete references to the Board of Education resulting in the Board no longer being subject to, controlled and/or governed by the Charter but instead governed by State law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15002, "no_votes": 11231, "total_votes": 26233, "percent_yes": 57.18751191247665, "percent_no": 42.81248808752335, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.715441", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.588471", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended to delete references to the Board of Education resulting in the Board no longer being subject to, controlled and/or governed by the Charter but instead governed by State law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8284, "fingerprint": "2004|200400370|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400370|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "dd1ccbf12c68224f", "measure_id": "200400370", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Paramedic Advanced Life Support Fire Engines and Ambulance Special Tax (ALS), which was previously approved by the voters to fund paramedic engines and future ambulance purchases, be amended to restructure how non residential properties are taxed under the ALS Special Tax.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5293, "no_votes": 1244, "total_votes": 6537, "percent_yes": 80.96986385191984, "percent_no": 19.03013614808016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.715779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.588663", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Paramedic Advanced Life Support Fire Engines and Ambulance Special Tax (ALS), which was previously approved by the voters to fund paramedic engines and future ambulance purchases, be amended to restructure how non residential properties are taxed under the ALS Special Tax.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11757, "fingerprint": "2004|200400371|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400371|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "009477f93130bad3", "measure_id": "200400371", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter and Code be amended to: authorize Council to implement public financing of elections for mayor, city council, school board and auditor for candidates who voluntaily agree to spending limits; establish related regulations and require $498,000 in annual General Fund appropriations when deemed economically feasible by Council.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20269, "no_votes": 29265, "total_votes": 49534, "percent_yes": 40.91936851455566, "percent_no": 59.08063148544434, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.674900", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.716105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.588862", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter and Code be amended to: authorize Council to implement public financing of elections for mayor, city council, school board and auditor for candidates who voluntaily agree to spending limits; establish related regulations and require $498,000 in annual General Fund appropriations when deemed economically feasible by Council.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8268, "fingerprint": "2004|200400053|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400053|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ae17ea553d1a6d08", "measure_id": "200400053", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the charter of the city of Berkeley be amended to require a runoff election for the offices of mayor, auditor, and councilmember only if the leading candidate for such office receives less than 40% of the votes; and delay the runoff to the following February, with the successful candidate assuming office in March?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17792, "no_votes": 14581, "total_votes": 32373, "percent_yes": 54.95937973002193, "percent_no": 45.04062026997807, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.710995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.585165", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the charter of the city of Berkeley be amended to require a runoff election for the offices of mayor, auditor, and councilmember only if the leading candidate for such office receives less than 40% of the votes; and delay the runoff to the following February, with the successful candidate assuming office in March?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11758, "fingerprint": "2004|200400372|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400372|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0a7249d358f8adc4", "measure_id": "200400372", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to change the date of mayoral elections to coincide with presidential elections and to adjust the mayor's term to two years on a one-time basis, in 2006 to accomplish this result?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35198, "no_votes": 13498, "total_votes": 48696, "percent_yes": 72.28109084935107, "percent_no": 27.718909150648926, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.675219", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.716421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.589058", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to change the date of mayoral elections to coincide with presidential elections and to adjust the mayor's term to two years on a one-time basis, in 2006 to accomplish this result?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8269, "fingerprint": "2004|200400054|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400054|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0f186ac98c2f506f", "measure_id": "200400054", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to authorize the city council to adopt an instant runoff election system, upon finding that acceptable voting systems and equipment make it technically feasible, consolidation of City election with County elections will remain feasible and the City will not incur additional election costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23660, "no_votes": 9088, "total_votes": 32748, "percent_yes": 72.24868694271406, "percent_no": 27.75131305728594, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.711294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.585359", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to authorize the city council to adopt an instant runoff election system, upon finding that acceptable voting systems and equipment make it technically feasible, consolidation of City election with County elections will remain feasible and the City will not incur additional election costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11759, "fingerprint": "2004|200400373|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400373|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "44b9e9fe1f4ca928", "measure_id": "200400373", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the utility users tax be temporarily increased from 7.5% to 9.0% for the calendar years 2005-2008, expenditure of the additional proceeds be authorized, and prior amendments to be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18764, "no_votes": 31449, "total_votes": 50213, "percent_yes": 37.36880887419592, "percent_no": 62.63119112580408, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.675747", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.716697", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.589252", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the utility users tax be temporarily increased from 7.5% to 9.0% for the calendar years 2005-2008, expenditure of the additional proceeds be authorized, and prior amendments to be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8270, "fingerprint": "2004|200400055|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400055|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b779c29043bb35a9", "measure_id": "200400055", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to require that candidates for council office be nominated by voters registered in the applicable council district and that candidates for the office of mayor, councilmember, auditor, rent stabilization board commissioner and school board director pay a filing fee of $150 which may be offset, in whole or in part, for each dollar of fee, by submission of the signatures of city registered voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19341, "no_votes": 11608, "total_votes": 30949, "percent_yes": 62.49313386539145, "percent_no": 37.50686613460855, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.711563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.585553", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to require that candidates for council office be nominated by voters registered in the applicable council district and that candidates for the office of mayor, councilmember, auditor, rent stabilization board commissioner and school board director pay a filing fee of $150 which may be offset, in whole or in part, for each dollar of fee, by submission of the signatures of city registered voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11760, "fingerprint": "2004|200400374|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400374|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "231ea10712b58758", "measure_id": "200400374", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special tax to fund youth services and youth safety programs, be authorized on real property transfers through December 31, 2010, at the rate of 0.5% on transfers for $600,000 or more, and 1% on transfers for $1,000,000 or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27731, "no_votes": 23358, "total_votes": 51089, "percent_yes": 54.279786255358296, "percent_no": 45.720213744641704, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.676122", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.716964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.589444", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax to fund youth services and youth safety programs, be authorized on real property transfers through December 31, 2010, at the rate of 0.5% on transfers for $600,000 or more, and 1% on transfers for $1,000,000 or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8277, "fingerprint": "2004|200400062|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400062|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c52ffc713fbd825a", "measure_id": "200400062", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a Public Safety Services Tax, to \"expire\" in five years, be approved to fund continued police and fire protection services in Union City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6559, "no_votes": 2959, "total_votes": 9518, "percent_yes": 68.91153603698255, "percent_no": 31.088463963017446, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.713537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.587160", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Public Safety Services Tax, to \"expire\" in five years, be approved to fund continued police and fire protection services in Union City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11761, "fingerprint": "2004|200400375|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400375|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e6afd40669215662", "measure_id": "200400375", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the special tax for the Berkeley Public Library be amended to: increase the per foot tax rate from $0.132172 to $0.1540 for residential property and $0.2001 to $0.2331 for other property; change the annual inflation adjustment to 5%; increase the expenditure limitation through FY 2008?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26027, "no_votes": 25001, "total_votes": 51028, "percent_yes": 51.005330406835455, "percent_no": 48.994669593164545, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.676474", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.717229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.589638", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the special tax for the Berkeley Public Library be amended to: increase the per foot tax rate from $0.132172 to $0.1540 for residential property and $0.2001 to $0.2331 for other property; change the annual inflation adjustment to 5%; increase the expenditure limitation through FY 2008?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8282, "fingerprint": "2004|200400133|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400133|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c69d46d1bdc39fd3", "measure_id": "200400133", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, repair buildings, improve safety, accommodate growing enrollment by repairing leaky roofs, decaying walls, electrical wiring; improving fire safety; removing asbestos; expanding/establishing Stockton, Manteca, Lodi/Galt, Foothill Area campuses/education centers; upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping building, sites, classrooms; shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District issue $250,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30, "no_votes": 26, "total_votes": 56, "percent_yes": 53.57142857142857, "percent_no": 46.42857142857143, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.715107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.588278", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, repair buildings, improve safety, accommodate growing enrollment by repairing leaky roofs, decaying walls, electrical wiring; improving fire safety; removing asbestos; expanding/establishing Stockton, Manteca, Lodi/Galt, Foothill Area campuses/education centers; upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping building, sites, classrooms; shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District issue $250,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8285, "fingerprint": "2004|200400376|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400376|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3c0ae4bc6be0465f", "measure_id": "200400376", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the special tax for paramedic services be amended to: increase the tax rate from $0.02626 to $0.41634 per square foot; add personal income growth as an alternative inflation adjustment; and authorize the expenditure of the additional proceeds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22426, "no_votes": 26934, "total_votes": 49360, "percent_yes": 45.43354943273906, "percent_no": 54.56645056726094, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.717494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.589916", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the special tax for paramedic services be amended to: increase the tax rate from $0.02626 to $0.41634 per square foot; add personal income growth as an alternative inflation adjustment; and authorize the expenditure of the additional proceeds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8286, "fingerprint": "2004|200400377|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400377|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "614ad753037d589f", "measure_id": "200400377", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (or ceiling on city expenditures) be increased to allow for the expenditure of taxes previously approved by voters for parks maintenance; libraries; emergency medical services, and emergency services for severely disabled persons for fiscal year 2005 through 2008?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38578, "no_votes": 9783, "total_votes": 48361, "percent_yes": 79.77088976654743, "percent_no": 20.229110233452573, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.717761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.590109", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (or ceiling on city expenditures) be increased to allow for the expenditure of taxes previously approved by voters for parks maintenance; libraries; emergency medical services, and emergency services for severely disabled persons for fiscal year 2005 through 2008?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11762, "fingerprint": "2004|200400378|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400378|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "bee023fe42ab6dd8", "measure_id": "200400378", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Berkeley Rent Stabilization and Good Cause for Eviction ordinance be amended to provide that the Annual General Adjustment (AGA) of base rent ceiling be 65% of the increase in the prior year's Consumer Price Index in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area with a cap of 7% and a floor of 0% per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34407, "no_votes": 11660, "total_votes": 46067, "percent_yes": 74.68903987670133, "percent_no": 25.31096012329867, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.677489", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.718026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.590307", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Berkeley Rent Stabilization and Good Cause for Eviction ordinance be amended to provide that the Annual General Adjustment (AGA) of base rent ceiling be 65% of the increase in the prior year's Consumer Price Index in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area with a cap of 7% and a floor of 0% per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8271, "fingerprint": "2004|200400056|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400056|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9ea203e615770725", "measure_id": "200400056", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to require wireless telephonic service providers to change the methodology of computing the current City of Oakland Utility User's Tax (\"UUT\") to be consistent with the Federal Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act of 2000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43450, "no_votes": 27492, "total_votes": 70942, "percent_yes": 61.24721603563474, "percent_no": 38.75278396436526, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.711831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.585885", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to require wireless telephonic service providers to change the methodology of computing the current City of Oakland Utility User's Tax (\"UUT\") to be consistent with the Federal Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act of 2000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11763, "fingerprint": "2004|200400379|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400379|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "87cf5b758b27ed70", "measure_id": "200400379", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Berkeley Rent Stabilization and Eviction for Good Cause for Ordinance be amended to: regulate Section 8 rent above the federal pament standard; exempt certain subsidized units; specify rent deposit interest rate reimbursment; permit City use of Rent Board information; set base rent for certain units; limit eviction of tenant for replacement roommate; and eliminate most criminal penalties?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30392, "no_votes": 15011, "total_votes": 45403, "percent_yes": 66.93830804131885, "percent_no": 33.06169195868115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.677827", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.718300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.590497", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Berkeley Rent Stabilization and Eviction for Good Cause for Ordinance be amended to: regulate Section 8 rent above the federal pament standard; exempt certain subsidized units; specify rent deposit interest rate reimbursment; permit City use of Rent Board information; set base rent for certain units; limit eviction of tenant for replacement roommate; and eliminate most criminal penalties?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8272, "fingerprint": "2004|200400057|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400057|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0eabdbd7fea2d51e", "measure_id": "200400057", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Charter be amended to retain the Mayor-Council form of government (\"Strong Mayor\") and elected City Attorney and provide (1) that no person may be elected Mayor for more than two consecutive terms; (2) Mayor must annually hold four public meetings; (3) that Council make appointments to boards and commissions when vacancies are unfilled; (4) limitations and voter-approval requirments for Councilmember salary increases; and (5) formula setting City Attorney and Auditor salary increases?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54604, "no_votes": 23705, "total_votes": 78309, "percent_yes": 69.72889450765557, "percent_no": 30.271105492344432, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.712131", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.586102", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Charter be amended to retain the Mayor-Council form of government (\"Strong Mayor\") and elected City Attorney and provide (1) that no person may be elected Mayor for more than two consecutive terms; (2) Mayor must annually hold four public meetings; (3) that Council make appointments to boards and commissions when vacancies are unfilled; (4) limitations and voter-approval requirments for Councilmember salary increases; and (5) formula setting City Attorney and Auditor salary increases?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11764, "fingerprint": "2004|200400380|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400380|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "862298c437eafb2d", "measure_id": "200400380", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted to: 1) make enforcement of prostitution laws the lowest priority; 2) oppose laws making prosititution a crime; and 3) require semi-annual reporting of prosititution-related Berkeley Police Department law enforcement activities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18516, "no_votes": 32225, "total_votes": 50741, "percent_yes": 36.49120040992492, "percent_no": 63.50879959007508, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.678133", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.718576", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.590690", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted to: 1) make enforcement of prostitution laws the lowest priority; 2) oppose laws making prosititution a crime; and 3) require semi-annual reporting of prosititution-related Berkeley Police Department law enforcement activities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8273, "fingerprint": "2004|200400058|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400058|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "172718f4d6ef1832", "measure_id": "200400058", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For the purpose of: (1) Maintaining and expanding neighborhood branch library services, days, and hours; (2) maintaining after school homework and tutoring programs; (3) maintaining literacy and children's programs; (4) increasing librarian services to schools; (5) increasing computer and technology access and (6) acquiring new books and materials; shall the City of Oakland extend and increase the existing library parcel tax, subject to independent audits and citizen's oversight commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62253, "no_votes": 18437, "total_votes": 80690, "percent_yes": 77.15082414177718, "percent_no": 22.84917585822282, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.712425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.586300", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the purpose of: (1) Maintaining and expanding neighborhood branch library services, days, and hours; (2) maintaining after school homework and tutoring programs; (3) maintaining literacy and children's programs; (4) increasing librarian services to schools; (5) increasing computer and technology access and (6) acquiring new books and materials; shall the City of Oakland extend and increase the existing library parcel tax, subject to independent audits and citizen's oversight commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11765, "fingerprint": "2004|200400381|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400381|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "424ed11901166bb5", "measure_id": "200400381", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City's ordinances be amended to require the City to issue a permit to medical marijuana dispensaries as a matter of right and without a public hearing, eliminate limits on the amounts of medical marijuana possessed by patients or caregivers; and establish a peer review group for medical marijuana collectives?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24976, "no_votes": 25167, "total_votes": 50143, "percent_yes": 49.80954470215185, "percent_no": 50.19045529784815, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.678447", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.718841", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.590882", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the City's ordinances be amended to require the City to issue a permit to medical marijuana dispensaries as a matter of right and without a public hearing, eliminate limits on the amounts of medical marijuana possessed by patients or caregivers; and establish a peer review group for medical marijuana collectives?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8274, "fingerprint": "2004|200400059|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400059|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5c84c8e8848efabf", "measure_id": "200400059", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For the purpose of providing: (1) job training and employment opportunities for young adults; (2) counseling and mentoring for at-risk youth; (3) after-school, parent involvement, and violence prevention programs in schools; (4) early childhood intervention for children exposed to violence in the home; and (5) community-based policing programs; shall the City of Oakland authorize a special parcel tax, subject to audit by a citizen's oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51581, "no_votes": 26743, "total_votes": 78324, "percent_yes": 65.85593177059394, "percent_no": 34.14406822940606, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.712736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.586499", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the purpose of providing: (1) job training and employment opportunities for young adults; (2) counseling and mentoring for at-risk youth; (3) after-school, parent involvement, and violence prevention programs in schools; (4) early childhood intervention for children exposed to violence in the home; and (5) community-based policing programs; shall the City of Oakland authorize a special parcel tax, subject to audit by a citizen's oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11766, "fingerprint": "2004|200400382|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400382|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "4574d028c87c7961", "measure_id": "200400382", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted: 1) creating a 13-18 member Tree Board with up to two full-time staff, which is empowered to oversee the ordinance's prohibition on alteration, topping or removal of established nonhazardous public trees (except in limited circumstances) establish City tree contractors licensing requirements, approve tree plantings; and 2) creating related regulations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13354, "no_votes": 35072, "total_votes": 48426, "percent_yes": 27.57609548589601, "percent_no": 72.423904514104, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.678772", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.719107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.591073", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an ordinance be adopted: 1) creating a 13-18 member Tree Board with up to two full-time staff, which is empowered to oversee the ordinance's prohibition on alteration, topping or removal of established nonhazardous public trees (except in limited circumstances) establish City tree contractors licensing requirements, approve tree plantings; and 2) creating related regulations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8275, "fingerprint": "2004|200400060|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400060|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b6b49f4369c300ac", "measure_id": "200400060", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 20B of the Piedmont City Code be amended in it's entirety to provide for a Basic Municipal Services Tax as more specifically set forth in Ord. 644 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2935, "no_votes": 1822, "total_votes": 4757, "percent_yes": 61.69854950599117, "percent_no": 38.30145049400883, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.713004", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.586697", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 20B of the Piedmont City Code be amended in it's entirety to provide for a Basic Municipal Services Tax as more specifically set forth in Ord. 644 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11767, "fingerprint": "2004|200400383|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400383|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8a5c74b547fbe86e", "measure_id": "200400383", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 04-81, approving amendments to the City of Emeryville General Plan and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the Pixar Headquarters Expansion Project, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2459, "no_votes": 992, "total_votes": 3451, "percent_yes": 71.25470878006375, "percent_no": 28.74529121993625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.679059", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.719371", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.591262", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 04-81, approving amendments to the City of Emeryville General Plan and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the Pixar Headquarters Expansion Project, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8276, "fingerprint": "2004|200400061|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400061|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0f285efb620db740", "measure_id": "200400061", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 20F be added to the Piedmont City Code to provide for a Preserve Piedmont Service Level Tax as more specifically set forth in Ord. 645 N.S., which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2842, "no_votes": 1908, "total_votes": 4750, "percent_yes": 59.83157894736843, "percent_no": 40.16842105263157, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.713272", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.586901", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 20F be added to the Piedmont City Code to provide for a Preserve Piedmont Service Level Tax as more specifically set forth in Ord. 645 N.S., which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8287, "fingerprint": "2004|200400384|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400384|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "702bb8e9ec60947a", "measure_id": "200400384", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-005, approving an amending and restated development agreement between the City of Emeryville and Pixar, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2411, "no_votes": 1029, "total_votes": 3440, "percent_yes": 70.08720930232558, "percent_no": 29.912790697674424, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.719701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.591450", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-005, approving an amending and restated development agreement between the City of Emeryville and Pixar, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8288, "fingerprint": "2004|200400385|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400385|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a50ffc9a40ae6a75", "measure_id": "200400385", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help preserve the safety and character of Fremont, with a priority on funding essential services such as police, fire and street and park maintenance (as well as other general city services), shall an ordinance be adopted to establish a utility users tax that cannot ever exceed 6%, and establish an independent Fremont taxpayers committee to oversee the expenditure of these funds and advise the City Council as reductions become possible?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27708, "no_votes": 34254, "total_votes": 61962, "percent_yes": 44.71773022174881, "percent_no": 55.28226977825119, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.719973", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.591644", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help preserve the safety and character of Fremont, with a priority on funding essential services such as police, fire and street and park maintenance (as well as other general city services), shall an ordinance be adopted to establish a utility users tax that cannot ever exceed 6%, and establish an independent Fremont taxpayers committee to oversee the expenditure of these funds and advise the City Council as reductions become possible?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8291, "fingerprint": "2004|200400388|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400388|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "98ee1e92cbfed145", "measure_id": "200400388", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain essential police, fire and paramedic services, to prevent the reduction in maintenance of City parks, greenspace and other public areas, and to prevent the loss of youth, family and senior recreational and safety services, shall the City of Piedmont continue to authorize a parcel tax, replacing the existing Municipal Services Tax, as is more specifically set forth in Ord. 650 N.S. which is on file with the City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5197, "no_votes": 1310, "total_votes": 6507, "percent_yes": 79.86783463961888, "percent_no": 20.132165360381123, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.720850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.592220", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain essential police, fire and paramedic services, to prevent the reduction in maintenance of City parks, greenspace and other public areas, and to prevent the loss of youth, family and senior recreational and safety services, shall the City of Piedmont continue to authorize a parcel tax, replacing the existing Municipal Services Tax, as is more specifically set forth in Ord. 650 N.S. which is on file with the City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8292, "fingerprint": "2004|200400389|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400389|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ab7927f93a286ad7", "measure_id": "200400389", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the voters be guaranteed the right to approve the land use plan (Phase II) for the Bernal Property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26618, "no_votes": 3138, "total_votes": 29756, "percent_yes": 89.4542277187794, "percent_no": 10.545772281220593, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.721117", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.592409", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the voters be guaranteed the right to approve the land use plan (Phase II) for the Bernal Property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8289, "fingerprint": "2004|200400386|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400386|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c32086e124018f89", "measure_id": "200400386", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To reduce violent crime and increase public saftey, shall the City of Oakland increase successful after school, counseling, truancy, and job training programs, early intervention programs for children who witness violence, programs to prevent child abuse and domestic violence, and increase community police officers, paramedics and emergency fire personnel in each neighborhood by authorizing a surcharge on parking in commerical parking lots and parcel tax subject to annual performance and financial audits by a citizens oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 96473, "no_votes": 42048, "total_votes": 138521, "percent_yes": 69.64503577074956, "percent_no": 30.35496422925044, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.720310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.591834", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce violent crime and increase public saftey, shall the City of Oakland increase successful after school, counseling, truancy, and job training programs, early intervention programs for children who witness violence, programs to prevent child abuse and domestic violence, and increase community police officers, paramedics and emergency fire personnel in each neighborhood by authorizing a surcharge on parking in commerical parking lots and parcel tax subject to annual performance and financial audits by a citizens oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8290, "fingerprint": "2004|200400387|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400387|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "967d6e224ada2d01", "measure_id": "200400387", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance requiring the City of Oakland (1) to make enforcement related to private adult cannabis (marijuana) use, distribution, sale, cultivation and possesion, the City's lowest law enforcement priority; (2) to lobby to legalize, tax and regulate cannabis for adult private use, distribution, sale, cultivation and possesion; (3) to license, tax and regulate cannabis sales if California law is amended to allow such actions; and (4) to create a committee to oversee the ordinance's implementation, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 87446, "no_votes": 4669, "total_votes": 92115, "percent_yes": 94.93133583021223, "percent_no": 5.068664169787766, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.720581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.592024", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance requiring the City of Oakland (1) to make enforcement related to private adult cannabis (marijuana) use, distribution, sale, cultivation and possesion, the City's lowest law enforcement priority; (2) to lobby to legalize, tax and regulate cannabis for adult private use, distribution, sale, cultivation and possesion; (3) to license, tax and regulate cannabis sales if California law is amended to allow such actions; and (4) to create a committee to oversee the ordinance's implementation, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8295, "fingerprint": "2004|200400392|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400392|AMADOR", "content_hash": "37b02390cd7fb95b", "measure_id": "200400392", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council of the City of Ione Be Authorized To Impose, by Ordinance, a Tax of Ten Percent (10%) Upon the Occupancy of Transient Lodging Establishments Within the City and Make Any Other Required Municipal Code Amendments to Carry Out the Intent of the Voters.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 847, "no_votes": 664, "total_votes": 1511, "percent_yes": 56.05559232296492, "percent_no": 43.94440767703508, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.723451", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.593936", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council of the City of Ione Be Authorized To Impose, by Ordinance, a Tax of Ten Percent (10%) Upon the Occupancy of Transient Lodging Establishments Within the City and Make Any Other Required Municipal Code Amendments to Carry Out the Intent of the Voters.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8296, "fingerprint": "2004|200400063|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400063|BUTTE", "content_hash": "d5a9385b48a653f1", "measure_id": "200400063", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oroville City Charter be amended by the addition of Article XXI requiring binding arbitration of unresolved employment disputes and controversies between the City of Oroville and a City Fire Department employee organization? This amendment would establish a mandatory procedure under which an arbitration board, composed of three persons, would have the power to decide unresolved disputes between the City and Fire department employee organization concerning wages, hours and conditions of employment.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1575, "no_votes": 806, "total_votes": 2381, "percent_yes": 66.14867702645947, "percent_no": 33.85132297354053, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.723720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.594125", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oroville City Charter be amended by the addition of Article XXI requiring binding arbitration of unresolved employment disputes and controversies between the City of Oroville and a City Fire Department employee organization? This amendment would establish a mandatory procedure under which an arbitration board, composed of three persons, would have the power to decide unresolved disputes between the City and Fire department employee organization concerning wages, hours and conditions of employment.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8298, "fingerprint": "2004|200400134|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400134|BUTTE", "content_hash": "bad42f32aa82367a", "measure_id": "200400134", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the abolishment of Trustee Areas in Paradise Unified School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6315, "no_votes": 5711, "total_votes": 12026, "percent_yes": 52.51122567769833, "percent_no": 47.48877432230167, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.724254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.594504", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the abolishment of Trustee Areas in Paradise Unified School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8297, "fingerprint": "2004|200400064|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400064|BUTTE", "content_hash": "a669ad77eec877da", "measure_id": "200400064", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance imposing an increase of the existing Transient Occupancy Tax on the guests of hotels within Paradise from 6% to 10% fro general municipal purposes be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5547, "no_votes": 3280, "total_votes": 8827, "percent_yes": 62.84128242891129, "percent_no": 37.15871757108871, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.723988", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.594315", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance imposing an increase of the existing Transient Occupancy Tax on the guests of hotels within Paradise from 6% to 10% fro general municipal purposes be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8299, "fingerprint": "2004|200400284|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400284|BUTTE", "content_hash": "9966a8e0167e27b3", "measure_id": "200400284", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the \"County Ordinance Prohibiting Growing of Genetically Engineered Organisms\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35331, "no_votes": 53154, "total_votes": 88485, "percent_yes": 39.92880149177826, "percent_no": 60.07119850822174, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.724517", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.594701", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \"County Ordinance Prohibiting Growing of Genetically Engineered Organisms\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8300, "fingerprint": "2004|200400393|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400393|BUTTE", "content_hash": "1e91108c1768aa49", "measure_id": "200400393", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 403 of the City Charter, which now requires that candidates for City Council be city residents, over the age of 21 and registered to vote, be amended to reduce the minimum age for a candidate from 21 to 18?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10846, "no_votes": 17152, "total_votes": 27998, "percent_yes": 38.73848132009429, "percent_no": 61.26151867990571, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.724782", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.594895", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 403 of the City Charter, which now requires that candidates for City Council be city residents, over the age of 21 and registered to vote, be amended to reduce the minimum age for a candidate from 21 to 18?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8301, "fingerprint": "2004|200400394|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400394|BUTTE", "content_hash": "deed8a3888e465e4", "measure_id": "200400394", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 601 of the City Charter, which sets the monthly remuneration of councilmembers at not more then $60 and the monthly remuneration of the mayor at an additional $25, be amended to set a salary for councilmember at the same level as that authorized under state law for councilmember in general law cities and to provided for the mayor to receive an additional salary of 20 percent of the salary of a councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13593, "no_votes": 12542, "total_votes": 26135, "percent_yes": 52.01071360244882, "percent_no": 47.98928639755118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.725080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.595085", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 601 of the City Charter, which sets the monthly remuneration of councilmembers at not more then $60 and the monthly remuneration of the mayor at an additional $25, be amended to set a salary for councilmember at the same level as that authorized under state law for councilmember in general law cities and to provided for the mayor to receive an additional salary of 20 percent of the salary of a councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8302, "fingerprint": "2004|200400395|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400395|BUTTE", "content_hash": "dccb974d9ca9e014", "measure_id": "200400395", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 406 of the City Charter, which provides that a council vacancy be filled by appointment during the first 30 days and thereafter by special election, be amended to provide that the vacancy be filled by appointment during the first 30 days or by special election, unless the term of the vacant office expires in less then six months and the election cannot occur at least 42 days before the next general municipal election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18813, "no_votes": 6296, "total_votes": 25109, "percent_yes": 74.92532558046916, "percent_no": 25.074674419530837, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.725374", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.595280", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 406 of the City Charter, which provides that a council vacancy be filled by appointment during the first 30 days and thereafter by special election, be amended to provide that the vacancy be filled by appointment during the first 30 days or by special election, unless the term of the vacant office expires in less then six months and the election cannot occur at least 42 days before the next general municipal election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8303, "fingerprint": "2004|200400396|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400396|BUTTE", "content_hash": "7d44ac584dee44a3", "measure_id": "200400396", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 1102 and 1103 of the City Charter, which now provide for the preparation and adoption of an annual city budget, be amended to provide for the preparation and adoption of either an annual or a biennial city budget, at the option of the city council, all as set forth in council Resolution No. 09 04-05?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16054, "no_votes": 9265, "total_votes": 25319, "percent_yes": 63.40692760377582, "percent_no": 36.59307239622418, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.725670", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.595471", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 1102 and 1103 of the City Charter, which now provide for the preparation and adoption of an annual city budget, be amended to provide for the preparation and adoption of either an annual or a biennial city budget, at the option of the city council, all as set forth in council Resolution No. 09 04-05?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8304, "fingerprint": "2004|200400397|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400397|BUTTE", "content_hash": "d0ecdbd4937ab0be", "measure_id": "200400397", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 106, 502, 608, 614, 1004, 1106, 1113, 1114, and 1505 of the City Charter be amended; Section 504, 910 and 1112 of the City Charter be repealed; and a new Section 1112 be added to the City Charter to make technical, nonsubstantive amendments, all as set forth in council Resolution No. 09 04-05?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14102, "no_votes": 8723, "total_votes": 22825, "percent_yes": 61.78313253012048, "percent_no": 38.21686746987952, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.725938", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.595662", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 106, 502, 608, 614, 1004, 1106, 1113, 1114, and 1505 of the City Charter be amended; Section 504, 910 and 1112 of the City Charter be repealed; and a new Section 1112 be added to the City Charter to make technical, nonsubstantive amendments, all as set forth in council Resolution No. 09 04-05?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8308, "fingerprint": "2004|200400608|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400608|BUTTE", "content_hash": "4673624a5ff43d1a", "measure_id": "200400608", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funding for a new library/media center, adding and expanding science labs, relocating music rooms and equipping facilities at Nelson Avenue Middle School; to improve student safety by rehabilitating student loading zones, sidewalks, and parking areas at all schools; and to provide new playground equipment and bleachers at District schools, shall the Thermalito Union School District issue bonds of $2,050,000 at legal interest rates, with an independent citizen oversight committee and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1721, "no_votes": 1278, "total_votes": 2999, "percent_yes": 57.38579526508836, "percent_no": 42.61420473491164, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.727879", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.596425", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for a new library/media center, adding and expanding science labs, relocating music rooms and equipping facilities at Nelson Avenue Middle School; to improve student safety by rehabilitating student loading zones, sidewalks, and parking areas at all schools; and to provide new playground equipment and bleachers at District schools, shall the Thermalito Union School District issue bonds of $2,050,000 at legal interest rates, with an independent citizen oversight committee and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8306, "fingerprint": "2004|200400399|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400399|BUTTE", "content_hash": "aeccd1b486ab09cb", "measure_id": "200400399", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance imposing a $1.00 per month tax on every parcel within the Town of Paradise jurisdiction to fund the operation and maintenance of the animal control services and shelter be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10327, "no_votes": 3389, "total_votes": 13716, "percent_yes": 75.29163021289006, "percent_no": 24.708369787109945, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.726469", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.596046", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance imposing a $1.00 per month tax on every parcel within the Town of Paradise jurisdiction to fund the operation and maintenance of the animal control services and shelter be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8307, "fingerprint": "2004|200400400|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400400|BUTTE", "content_hash": "5f6eed213371dd1c", "measure_id": "200400400", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Town of Paradise Resolution No. 04-23, A Resolution of the Town Council Amending the Land Use Map of the 1994 General Plan (GR-01-2-FHK Companies) be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8018, "no_votes": 5514, "total_votes": 13532, "percent_yes": 59.25214306828259, "percent_no": 40.74785693171741, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.727455", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.596235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Town of Paradise Resolution No. 04-23, A Resolution of the Town Council Amending the Land Use Map of the 1994 General Plan (GR-01-2-FHK Companies) be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8305, "fingerprint": "2004|200400398|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400398|BUTTE", "content_hash": "095df03f3c02bdb3", "measure_id": "200400398", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance imposing an increase of the existing Transient Occupancy Tax on the guests of hotels within Oroville from 9% to 12% for general municipal purposes be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1503, "no_votes": 2186, "total_votes": 3689, "percent_yes": 40.742748712388185, "percent_no": 59.257251287611815, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.726204", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.595856", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance imposing an increase of the existing Transient Occupancy Tax on the guests of hotels within Oroville from 9% to 12% for general municipal purposes be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8312, "fingerprint": "2004|200400285|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400285|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "934a314707b4654d", "measure_id": "200400285", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance be amended effective January 1, 2005 to increase the rate of tax from six percent (6%) to ten percent (10%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8849, "no_votes": 12343, "total_votes": 21192, "percent_yes": 41.75632314080785, "percent_no": 58.24367685919215, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.729117", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.597229", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance be amended effective January 1, 2005 to increase the rate of tax from six percent (6%) to ten percent (10%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8313, "fingerprint": "2004|200400609|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400609|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "26e4847d109913de", "measure_id": "200400609", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Modesto Junior College and Columbia College students for jobs and four year colleges, repair buildings, and increase access to educational opportunities by repairing, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, science labs, establishing new and expanded college education centers in Turlock, Oakdale, Patterson and Calaveras County, and acquiring land, modernizing classroom technology, shall Yosemite Community College District issue $326,174,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5354, "no_votes": 4097, "total_votes": 9451, "percent_yes": 56.65008993757274, "percent_no": 43.34991006242726, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.729453", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.597417", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Modesto Junior College and Columbia College students for jobs and four year colleges, repair buildings, and increase access to educational opportunities by repairing, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, science labs, establishing new and expanded college education centers in Turlock, Oakdale, Patterson and Calaveras County, and acquiring land, modernizing classroom technology, shall Yosemite Community College District issue $326,174,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8310, "fingerprint": "2004|200400136|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400136|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "5773ee8b6ec8bbb3", "measure_id": "200400136", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding by constructing a gymnasium at Mark Twain School and a new elementary/middle school for Copperopolis students; to install classroom technology, renovate/modernize existing classrooms/facilities for student health and safety, improve traffic flow, upgrade utilities, kitchen, and student restrooms, construct support facilities; and qualify for $9,800,000 in State matching funds, shall Mark Twain Union Elementary School District issue $9,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, citizens' oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1786, "no_votes": 1099, "total_votes": 2885, "percent_yes": 61.90641247833623, "percent_no": 38.09358752166377, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.728513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.596839", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding by constructing a gymnasium at Mark Twain School and a new elementary/middle school for Copperopolis students; to install classroom technology, renovate/modernize existing classrooms/facilities for student health and safety, improve traffic flow, upgrade utilities, kitchen, and student restrooms, construct support facilities; and qualify for $9,800,000 in State matching funds, shall Mark Twain Union Elementary School District issue $9,600,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, citizens' oversight, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8311, "fingerprint": "2004|200400137|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400137|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "edb6de738351e41e", "measure_id": "200400137", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/transfer to four year colleges, repair buildings, improve safety, accommodate growing enrollment by Repairing leaky roofs, decaying walls, electrical wiring; Improving fire safey; Removing asbestos; Expanding/establishing Stockton, Manteca, Tracy, Lodi/Galt, Foothill Area campuses/education centers; Upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equpping buildings, sites, classrooms, shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District issue $250,000,000 in bounds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2967, "no_votes": 4830, "total_votes": 7797, "percent_yes": 38.05309734513274, "percent_no": 61.94690265486726, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.728825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.597034", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/transfer to four year colleges, repair buildings, improve safety, accommodate growing enrollment by Repairing leaky roofs, decaying walls, electrical wiring; Improving fire safey; Removing asbestos; Expanding/establishing Stockton, Manteca, Tracy, Lodi/Galt, Foothill Area campuses/education centers; Upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equpping buildings, sites, classrooms, shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District issue $250,000,000 in bounds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8309, "fingerprint": "2004|200400135|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400135|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "ff4a9b8c23c2b0ae", "measure_id": "200400135", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete improvements to Calaveras High School by constructing a new Performing Arts Building with auditorium and classrooms, and making needed improvements to fields, track, and swimming facilities, and for track and field improvements at Toyon Middle School, shall Calaveras Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $8,440,000 of bonds bearing interest at rates within the legal limit, with annual performance and financial audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3563, "no_votes": 4382, "total_votes": 7945, "percent_yes": 44.84581497797357, "percent_no": 55.15418502202643, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.728212", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.596647", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete improvements to Calaveras High School by constructing a new Performing Arts Building with auditorium and classrooms, and making needed improvements to fields, track, and swimming facilities, and for track and field improvements at Toyon Middle School, shall Calaveras Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $8,440,000 of bonds bearing interest at rates within the legal limit, with annual performance and financial audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8314, "fingerprint": "2004|200400286|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400286|COLUSA", "content_hash": "b3823ce7262e4b11", "measure_id": "200400286", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 682 of the Colusa County Board of Supervisors be approved to provide needed funding for the general operations of the County Departments for the purpose of maintaining existing services and perhaps improve services to the residents of the County?  Such revenues shall be used to supplement existing general funds and be allocated by the Board to the various departments as necessary including but not limited to Public Safety, Public Works and Roads, and Libraries, by levying a tax at the rate of one-half of one percent (.50%) for a maximum of three years.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2668, "no_votes": 3186, "total_votes": 5854, "percent_yes": 45.575674752306114, "percent_no": 54.424325247693886, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.729775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.597615", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 682 of the Colusa County Board of Supervisors be approved to provide needed funding for the general operations of the County Departments for the purpose of maintaining existing services and perhaps improve services to the residents of the County?  Such revenues shall be used to supplement existing general funds and be allocated by the Board to the various departments as necessary including but not limited to Public Safety, Public Works and Roads, and Libraries, by levying a tax at the rate of one-half of one percent (.50%) for a maximum of three years.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8322, "fingerprint": "2004|200400254|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400254|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7a36dc89c519811a", "measure_id": "200400254", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain high quality teachers, keep smaller class sizes, keep school libraries open, keep counselors, and keep elementary instrumental music programs, shall the San Ramon Valley Unified School District levy an annual tax of $90 per taxable parcel for five years only, beginning July 1,2004, with independent annual audits and a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24076, "no_votes": 9363, "total_votes": 33439, "percent_yes": 71.99976075839588, "percent_no": 28.00023924160412, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.732456", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.599348", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain high quality teachers, keep smaller class sizes, keep school libraries open, keep counselors, and keep elementary instrumental music programs, shall the San Ramon Valley Unified School District levy an annual tax of $90 per taxable parcel for five years only, beginning July 1,2004, with independent annual audits and a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11774, "fingerprint": "2004|200400264|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400264|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ee393d0269ac0a8a", "measure_id": "200400264", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain reduced class sizes; purchase textbooks and teaching materials; attract and retain qualified teachers, aides and counselors; enhance core subjects; restore library services and athletic programs; and improve custodial services, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District be authorized to levy, for 5 years only beginning July 1, 2004, an annual tax of 7.2 cents per square foot of total building area or $7.20 per vacant parcel, with an exemption for eligible seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32859, "no_votes": 13696, "total_votes": 46555, "percent_yes": 70.58103318655354, "percent_no": 29.41896681344646, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-06-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.691571", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.732817", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.599538", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain reduced class sizes; purchase textbooks and teaching materials; attract and retain qualified teachers, aides and counselors; enhance core subjects; restore library services and athletic programs; and improve custodial services, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District be authorized to levy, for 5 years only beginning July 1, 2004, an annual tax of 7.2 cents per square foot of total building area or $7.20 per vacant parcel, with an exemption for eligible seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8319, "fingerprint": "2004|200400138|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400138|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e3ba08b51953d39f", "measure_id": "200400138", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Chatbot and Las Positas Colleges by: Repairing leaky roofs; Upgrading fire safety, campus security, plumbing/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for computer technology; Removing asbestos; Upgrading nursing/paramedics/job training classrooms;Reparing, constructing, acquiring, equipping classrooms, labs, sites and facilities; shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District issue $498,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40, "no_votes": 34, "total_votes": 74, "percent_yes": 54.054054054054056, "percent_no": 45.945945945945944, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.731587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.598772", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Chatbot and Las Positas Colleges by: Repairing leaky roofs; Upgrading fire safety, campus security, plumbing/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for computer technology; Removing asbestos; Upgrading nursing/paramedics/job training classrooms;Reparing, constructing, acquiring, equipping classrooms, labs, sites and facilities; shall Chabot-Las Positas Community College District issue $498,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8335, "fingerprint": "2004|200400613|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400613|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "776b44243ceb86a8", "measure_id": "200400613", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To alleviate overcrowded schools by building new classrooms and schools and continuing the renovation and modernization of local schools, shall the Pittsburg Unified School District be authorized to repair, replace, acquire, construct and renovate school facilities and equipment and issue $40,500,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee appointed to monitor the way all bond funds are spent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11311, "no_votes": 3188, "total_votes": 14499, "percent_yes": 78.01227670873854, "percent_no": 21.98772329126146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.738096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.603399", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To alleviate overcrowded schools by building new classrooms and schools and continuing the renovation and modernization of local schools, shall the Pittsburg Unified School District be authorized to repair, replace, acquire, construct and renovate school facilities and equipment and issue $40,500,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee appointed to monitor the way all bond funds are spent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8333, "fingerprint": "2004|200400611|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400611|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "11beb8cb8ff43b20", "measure_id": "200400611", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education by attracting and retaining qualified teachers and library staff, implementing smaller class sizes, restoring college and career preparation classes, providing instructors/equipment for science education, restoring high school counselors, and maintaining art/music programs; shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $120 per parcel for 5 years only, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, and an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by citizens age 65 or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65, "no_votes": 45, "total_votes": 110, "percent_yes": 59.09090909090909, "percent_no": 40.90909090909091, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.737479", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.603027", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education by attracting and retaining qualified teachers and library staff, implementing smaller class sizes, restoring college and career preparation classes, providing instructors/equipment for science education, restoring high school counselors, and maintaining art/music programs; shall Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $120 per parcel for 5 years only, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, and an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by citizens age 65 or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8332, "fingerprint": "2004|200400610|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400610|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "4f29f50330ceb2de", "measure_id": "200400610", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Byron Union School District construct additional classrooms; repair roofs and upgrade heating/air conditioning systems; improve student access to computers and technology; build new science labs and a library/media center; make health and safety improvements; and make the District eligible to receive State grants by issuing $14,299,707 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2756, "no_votes": 2302, "total_votes": 5058, "percent_yes": 54.48793989719256, "percent_no": 45.51206010280744, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.737130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.602833", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Byron Union School District construct additional classrooms; repair roofs and upgrade heating/air conditioning systems; improve student access to computers and technology; build new science labs and a library/media center; make health and safety improvements; and make the District eligible to receive State grants by issuing $14,299,707 in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8334, "fingerprint": "2004|200400612|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400612|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "4f3f1883662ed34d", "measure_id": "200400612", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To avoid overcrowding by building new elementary schools and to modernize Gehringer and Oakley Elementary Schools, including replacing electrical and fire safety systems; modernizing older classrooms; updating libraries and computer labs; and improving handicapped access to all schools, shall the Oakley Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $16,500,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5988, "no_votes": 2682, "total_votes": 8670, "percent_yes": 69.06574394463668, "percent_no": 30.93425605536332, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.737794", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.603215", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid overcrowding by building new elementary schools and to modernize Gehringer and Oakley Elementary Schools, including replacing electrical and fire safety systems; modernizing older classrooms; updating libraries and computer labs; and improving handicapped access to all schools, shall the Oakley Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $16,500,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8321, "fingerprint": "2004|200400140|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400140|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "628eb9374c228467", "measure_id": "200400140", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain reduced class sizes; purchase textbooks and teaching materials; attract and retain qualified teachers, aides and counselors; enhance core subjects including reading, writing, math, and science, and improve custodial services, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District be authorized to levy, for 5 years only beginning July 1, 2004, an annual tax of 6.8 cents per square foot of total building area or $6.80 per vacant parcel, with an exemption for eligible seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28785, "no_votes": 17138, "total_votes": 45923, "percent_yes": 62.68100951592884, "percent_no": 37.31899048407116, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.732134", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.599157", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain reduced class sizes; purchase textbooks and teaching materials; attract and retain qualified teachers, aides and counselors; enhance core subjects including reading, writing, math, and science, and improve custodial services, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District be authorized to levy, for 5 years only beginning July 1, 2004, an annual tax of 6.8 cents per square foot of total building area or $6.80 per vacant parcel, with an exemption for eligible seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11775, "fingerprint": "2004|200400401|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400401|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d030821e8dcebe7f", "measure_id": "200400401", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that continues and ratifies the existing eight percent Utility Users Tax in order to fund ongoing City services in the City of El Cerrito, provided that low income seniors are exempted from the Tax for electricity and gas and all expenditures are subject to an annual audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7163, "no_votes": 3756, "total_votes": 10919, "percent_yes": 65.60124553530542, "percent_no": 34.398754464694576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.692165", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.733429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.599920", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that continues and ratifies the existing eight percent Utility Users Tax in order to fund ongoing City services in the City of El Cerrito, provided that low income seniors are exempted from the Tax for electricity and gas and all expenditures are subject to an annual audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8320, "fingerprint": "2004|200400139|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400139|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8db42d235150debc", "measure_id": "200400139", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funding for Moraga's K-8 schools to maintain small class sizes, to protect strong academics, and to hire and retain qualified teachers and staff; shall the Moraga School District be authorized to replace its existing parcel tax with a levy of $325.00 per year per taxable parcel of real property with an annual independent audit and exemption for eligible low-income seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4443, "no_votes": 2208, "total_votes": 6651, "percent_yes": 66.80198466396031, "percent_no": 33.19801533603969, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.731863", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.598964", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for Moraga's K-8 schools to maintain small class sizes, to protect strong academics, and to hire and retain qualified teachers and staff; shall the Moraga School District be authorized to replace its existing parcel tax with a levy of $325.00 per year per taxable parcel of real property with an annual independent audit and exemption for eligible low-income seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11776, "fingerprint": "2004|200400402|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400402|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b39d128d4e9e148a", "measure_id": "200400402", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to maintain vital city services and prevent severe cuts in police, public safety, parks and recreation, and city services in Hercules, shall Ordinance 395 be adopted continuing the existing 6% utility users tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6280, "no_votes": 1923, "total_votes": 8203, "percent_yes": 76.55735706448861, "percent_no": 23.442642935511387, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.692495", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.733769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.600113", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain vital city services and prevent severe cuts in police, public safety, parks and recreation, and city services in Hercules, shall Ordinance 395 be adopted continuing the existing 6% utility users tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8315, "fingerprint": "2004|200400006|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400006|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2a0e32f6fcd9b427", "measure_id": "200400006", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Large-Scale Retail Businesses Ordinance, Contra Costa County Ordinance No.2003-18, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108770, "no_votes": 126055, "total_votes": 234825, "percent_yes": 46.31959970190567, "percent_no": 53.68040029809433, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.730069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.597811", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Large-Scale Retail Businesses Ordinance, Contra Costa County Ordinance No.2003-18, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11777, "fingerprint": "2004|200400403|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400403|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "47bc641b00ead640", "measure_id": "200400403", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the city of Hercules adopt an ordinance that will amend the Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Open Space/Conservation, Safety, Noise, Economic Development and Growth Management Elements of its General Plan and define the scope of the following land uses that can be allowed in the area of Hercules commonly known as Franklin Canyon: residential uses, residential rental of rooms, agricultural uses, rearing of animals, commercial uses, institutional uses, and government facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5214, "no_votes": 3054, "total_votes": 8268, "percent_yes": 63.062409288824384, "percent_no": 36.937590711175616, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.692773", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.734052", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.600304", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city of Hercules adopt an ordinance that will amend the Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Open Space/Conservation, Safety, Noise, Economic Development and Growth Management Elements of its General Plan and define the scope of the following land uses that can be allowed in the area of Hercules commonly known as Franklin Canyon: residential uses, residential rental of rooms, agricultural uses, rearing of animals, commercial uses, institutional uses, and government facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11773, "fingerprint": "2004|200400065|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400065|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "fe5204cf92a44141", "measure_id": "200400065", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Martinez City Council establish a Redevelopment Agency within the City of Martinez in accordance with State law, including the statutory provisions requiring public notice and hearing before the Redevelopment Agency can be established and its goals implemented?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6336, "no_votes": 5877, "total_votes": 12213, "percent_yes": 51.87914517317612, "percent_no": 48.12085482682388, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.689966", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.731289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.598576", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Martinez City Council establish a Redevelopment Agency within the City of Martinez in accordance with State law, including the statutory provisions requiring public notice and hearing before the Redevelopment Agency can be established and its goals implemented?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8316, "fingerprint": "2004|200400007|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400007|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d43b22df32fb5d5e", "measure_id": "200400007", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART; (B) New transbay commuter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network; (D) New expanded ferry service; (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail; Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1,2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121167, "no_votes": 114766, "total_votes": 235933, "percent_yes": 51.35652918413278, "percent_no": 48.64347081586722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.730358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.597999", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART; (B) New transbay commuter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network; (D) New expanded ferry service; (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail; Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1,2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8324, "fingerprint": "2004|200400404|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400404|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "4305ddfec418a11d", "measure_id": "200400404", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to continue the road and drain repair and reconstruction work begun in 1995 on Lafayette's major thoroughfares, and extend work to all of the City's neighborhood streets, shall the City of Lafayette be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of $29 million, to be repaid through an increase in the property tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7858, "no_votes": 5694, "total_votes": 13552, "percent_yes": 57.984061393152295, "percent_no": 42.015938606847705, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.734321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.600502", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to continue the road and drain repair and reconstruction work begun in 1995 on Lafayette's major thoroughfares, and extend work to all of the City's neighborhood streets, shall the City of Lafayette be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of $29 million, to be repaid through an increase in the property tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11778, "fingerprint": "2004|200400405|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400405|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ec42709cb10cfce0", "measure_id": "200400405", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to improve the quality of life for Martinez citizens by renovating the public library, making land and waterside improvements to the marina, upgrading and expanding city park facilities and fields, renovating Rankin Pool, and repaving city roads, shall the City of Martinez issue $30 million of bonds at tax-exempt rates, with spending subject to review by an independent citizens' oversight committee, biannual audits, and no money for city administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10485, "no_votes": 6467, "total_votes": 16952, "percent_yes": 61.8511090136857, "percent_no": 38.1488909863143, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.693417", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.734600", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.600699", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to improve the quality of life for Martinez citizens by renovating the public library, making land and waterside improvements to the marina, upgrading and expanding city park facilities and fields, renovating Rankin Pool, and repaving city roads, shall the City of Martinez issue $30 million of bonds at tax-exempt rates, with spending subject to review by an independent citizens' oversight committee, biannual audits, and no money for city administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8317, "fingerprint": "2004|200400008|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400008|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e92c7e51575b0764", "measure_id": "200400008", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Contra Costa County Ordinance 2003-31 be approved to authorize a special tax increase on property in County Service Area P-2 (Zone A), to a maximum of $270 per parcel for residential property (single and multiple), a maximum of $1620 per parcel for commercial/industrial/institutional property, and a maximum of $8100 per parcel for commercial/theater property, to provide additional funding for police protection service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1095, "no_votes": 1065, "total_votes": 2160, "percent_yes": 50.69444444444444, "percent_no": 49.30555555555556, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.730688", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.598193", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Contra Costa County Ordinance 2003-31 be approved to authorize a special tax increase on property in County Service Area P-2 (Zone A), to a maximum of $270 per parcel for residential property (single and multiple), a maximum of $1620 per parcel for commercial/industrial/institutional property, and a maximum of $8100 per parcel for commercial/theater property, to provide additional funding for police protection service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11779, "fingerprint": "2004|200400406|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400406|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b1a4b00ffdcbd16b", "measure_id": "200400406", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinanace be adopted to amend Section 3.26.180 of the Pinole Municipal Code to extend the existing Utility User Tax of eight percent for eight years, until December 1, 2012?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4580, "no_votes": 2769, "total_votes": 7349, "percent_yes": 62.32140427269016, "percent_no": 37.67859572730984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.693684", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.734886", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.600889", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinanace be adopted to amend Section 3.26.180 of the Pinole Municipal Code to extend the existing Utility User Tax of eight percent for eight years, until December 1, 2012?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8318, "fingerprint": "2004|200400009|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400009|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "84b3b8fe62d5491c", "measure_id": "200400009", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area R-7A (Alamo Parks and Recreation) be increased to $675,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the fiscal years 2002/2003 through 2005/2006 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3444, "no_votes": 1239, "total_votes": 4683, "percent_yes": 73.54260089686099, "percent_no": 26.45739910313901, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.731013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.598385", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area R-7A (Alamo Parks and Recreation) be increased to $675,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the fiscal years 2002/2003 through 2005/2006 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8325, "fingerprint": "2004|200400407|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400407|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "0cdc540ede680a25", "measure_id": "200400407", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance imposing a transaction sales and use tax of one-half of one percent (1/2%) in order to provide additional funds for general governmental purposes of the City, such as police, fire, emergency medical, library, recreation, local street maintenance and other general governmental services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16613, "no_votes": 11171, "total_votes": 27784, "percent_yes": 59.79340627699396, "percent_no": 40.20659372300604, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.735158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.601077", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance imposing a transaction sales and use tax of one-half of one percent (1/2%) in order to provide additional funds for general governmental purposes of the City, such as police, fire, emergency medical, library, recreation, local street maintenance and other general governmental services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8326, "fingerprint": "2004|200400408|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400408|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ee75220b47219879", "measure_id": "200400408", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to reduce the number of City Council members from nine to seven effective for the election scheduled for November 2008, as set forth in Section 1 of Exhibit A of City Council Resolution No. 89-04a on file in the office of the City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18620, "no_votes": 8364, "total_votes": 26984, "percent_yes": 69.00385413578417, "percent_no": 30.996145864215833, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.735425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.601266", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to reduce the number of City Council members from nine to seven effective for the election scheduled for November 2008, as set forth in Section 1 of Exhibit A of City Council Resolution No. 89-04a on file in the office of the City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8327, "fingerprint": "2004|200400409|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400409|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "219b6babaa4f8d05", "measure_id": "200400409", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance No. 2004-013 be enacted to reduce the City's existing Utility User's Tax rate from eight percent to seven percent, amending and modernizing the existing ordinance, providing gas, electric and water exemptions for low income San Pablo residents, providing for equal application of such tax on telephone communication and television services, and making other changes to deal with utility deregulation and changes in the law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3549, "no_votes": 1357, "total_votes": 4906, "percent_yes": 72.3399918467183, "percent_no": 27.660008153281694, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.735693", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.601455", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance No. 2004-013 be enacted to reduce the City's existing Utility User's Tax rate from eight percent to seven percent, amending and modernizing the existing ordinance, providing gas, electric and water exemptions for low income San Pablo residents, providing for equal application of such tax on telephone communication and television services, and making other changes to deal with utility deregulation and changes in the law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8328, "fingerprint": "2004|200400410|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400410|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "29fb826fdefef9ab", "measure_id": "200400410", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinanace No. 2004-014 be enacted to amend and modernize the City's Hotel Tax, increase such tax rate to twelve percent, clarify and reorganize the procedures for collection and enforcement of the tax, and provide full due process rights for all persons appealing the City's application of the tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2522, "no_votes": 2243, "total_votes": 4765, "percent_yes": 52.92759706190976, "percent_no": 47.07240293809024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.735985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.601836", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinanace No. 2004-014 be enacted to amend and modernize the City's Hotel Tax, increase such tax rate to twelve percent, clarify and reorganize the procedures for collection and enforcement of the tax, and provide full due process rights for all persons appealing the City's application of the tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8329, "fingerprint": "2004|200400411|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400411|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f8d4e8b84a172a9c", "measure_id": "200400411", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the San Ramon Municipal Code section A9-23 be amended to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax from seven and one-quarer percent (7.25%) to ten percent (10%) over a period of time, a portion of which increase to be used for economic development purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10591, "no_votes": 11182, "total_votes": 21773, "percent_yes": 48.642814495016765, "percent_no": 51.357185504983235, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.736320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.602215", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Ramon Municipal Code section A9-23 be amended to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax from seven and one-quarer percent (7.25%) to ten percent (10%) over a period of time, a portion of which increase to be used for economic development purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8330, "fingerprint": "2004|200400412|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400412|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "abceec59903b0bc3", "measure_id": "200400412", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the date of the City of San Ramon municipal elections be changed from the first Tuesday after the first Monday of each odd numbered year to the first Tuesday after the first Monday of each even numbered year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10032, "no_votes": 9413, "total_votes": 19445, "percent_yes": 51.59166880946259, "percent_no": 48.40833119053741, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.736592", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.602411", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the date of the City of San Ramon municipal elections be changed from the first Tuesday after the first Monday of each odd numbered year to the first Tuesday after the first Monday of each even numbered year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8331, "fingerprint": "2004|200400413|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400413|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200400413", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17255, "no_votes": 14109, "total_votes": 31364, "percent_yes": 55.01530417038643, "percent_no": 44.98469582961357, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.736861", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.602629", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8323, "fingerprint": "2004|200400287|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400287|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "a7b872ee293bccb3", "measure_id": "200400287", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Diablo Community Service District increase its powers and purposes to include the constructing , opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing, and maintaining, in whole or in part, of any street in the district, subject to the consent of the governing body of the county or city in which the improvement is to be made?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 490, "no_votes": 133, "total_votes": 623, "percent_yes": 78.65168539325843, "percent_no": 21.348314606741567, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.733140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.599731", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Diablo Community Service District increase its powers and purposes to include the constructing , opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing, and maintaining, in whole or in part, of any street in the district, subject to the consent of the governing body of the county or city in which the improvement is to be made?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8336, "fingerprint": "2004|200400288|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400288|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "14cebd270bd8f1ad", "measure_id": "200400288", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Del Norte County public library transactions and use tax ordinance, chapter 3.05 of the Del Norte ordinance code, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5877, "no_votes": 3028, "total_votes": 8905, "percent_yes": 65.99663110612016, "percent_no": 34.00336889387984, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.738432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.603586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Del Norte County public library transactions and use tax ordinance, chapter 3.05 of the Del Norte ordinance code, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8338, "fingerprint": "2004|200400614|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400614|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "9c1862750b76ad5d", "measure_id": "200400614", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Redwoods Community College District issue $40,820,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with tough accountability safeguards including an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee and annual audits--with no money used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4736, "no_votes": 3946, "total_votes": 8682, "percent_yes": 54.54964293941488, "percent_no": 45.45035706058512, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.739007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.603951", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Redwoods Community College District issue $40,820,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with tough accountability safeguards including an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee and annual audits--with no money used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8337, "fingerprint": "2004|200400289|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400289|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "27d02cc1c1b5eca5", "measure_id": "200400289", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Del Norte impose a temporary .50% general purpose transactions and use tax for the period of four years, the proceeds of which would be placed in the County's general fund and used for general governmental purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2225, "no_votes": 6649, "total_votes": 8874, "percent_yes": 25.073247689880557, "percent_no": 74.92675231011944, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.738736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.603768", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Del Norte impose a temporary .50% general purpose transactions and use tax for the period of four years, the proceeds of which would be placed in the County's general fund and used for general governmental purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8344, "fingerprint": "2004|200400290|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400290|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "bec7a169fd8be55f", "measure_id": "200400290", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Cameron Estates Community Services District build and/or install, operate, maintain and repair gates at the entrances and exits of the roads of the Cameron Estates Community Services District to regulate the use of the roads of the CECSD pursuant to California Government Code Section 61621.8 and the Cameron Estates Community Services District Ordinance 2003-06, as amended from time to time?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 334, "no_votes": 164, "total_votes": 498, "percent_yes": 67.06827309236948, "percent_no": 32.93172690763052, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.740760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.605056", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the Cameron Estates Community Services District build and/or install, operate, maintain and repair gates at the entrances and exits of the roads of the Cameron Estates Community Services District to regulate the use of the roads of the CECSD pursuant to California Government Code Section 61621.8 and the Cameron Estates Community Services District Ordinance 2003-06, as amended from time to time?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8346, "fingerprint": "2004|200400292|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400292|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "695bae1420fc680f", "measure_id": "200400292", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure D be adopted, which would amend various sections of the El Dorado County Charter to change the title of the county Chief Administrative Officer to Chief Executive Officer, make the Chief Executive Officer responsible for the administration of county operations, and transfer from the Board of Supervisors to the Chief Executive Officer a number of duties including the duties to appoint, suspend, remove, manage and review the performance of non-elected county department heads?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35064, "no_votes": 35351, "total_votes": 70415, "percent_yes": 49.79620819427678, "percent_no": 50.20379180572322, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.741299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.605424", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure D be adopted, which would amend various sections of the El Dorado County Charter to change the title of the county Chief Administrative Officer to Chief Executive Officer, make the Chief Executive Officer responsible for the administration of county operations, and transfer from the Board of Supervisors to the Chief Executive Officer a number of duties including the duties to appoint, suspend, remove, manage and review the performance of non-elected county department heads?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8342, "fingerprint": "2004|200400142|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400142|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "fa62884676834385", "measure_id": "200400142", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Sierra College campuses in Rocklin , Nevada County, Roseville, Lincoln, Truckee by: Fixing faulty sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls; Expanding nursing/police/firefighting centers; Upgrading classroom wiring; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equippping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall Sierra Joint Community College District issue $394,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1130, "no_votes": 1110, "total_votes": 2240, "percent_yes": 50.44642857142857, "percent_no": 49.55357142857143, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.740096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.604687", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Sierra College campuses in Rocklin , Nevada County, Roseville, Lincoln, Truckee by: Fixing faulty sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls; Expanding nursing/police/firefighting centers; Upgrading classroom wiring; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equippping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall Sierra Joint Community College District issue $394,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8345, "fingerprint": "2004|200400291|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400291|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a2f1100d8887eec6", "measure_id": "200400291", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the library special tax approved by the voters in the El Dorado Hills Zone of Benefit on March 5, 2002, be changed so that the tax on parcels of land with aparment units shall be increased to $20.00 per apartment instead of the current flat tax of $25.00 per parcel regardless of the number of apartments on the parcel? The current tax of $25.00 per parcel will remain unchanged for all other properties including single family homes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11280, "no_votes": 3463, "total_votes": 14743, "percent_yes": 76.51088652241742, "percent_no": 23.489113477582578, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.741030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.605235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the library special tax approved by the voters in the El Dorado Hills Zone of Benefit on March 5, 2002, be changed so that the tax on parcels of land with aparment units shall be increased to $20.00 per apartment instead of the current flat tax of $25.00 per parcel regardless of the number of apartments on the parcel? The current tax of $25.00 per parcel will remain unchanged for all other properties including single family homes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8339, "fingerprint": "2004|200400010|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400010|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "2093afa8ff937bd7", "measure_id": "200400010", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Measure G be approved, adopting the general plan proposed in the Measure as the official General Plan for the County of El Dorado, and specifying those aspects of the General Plan that can be amended by the Board of Supervisors without voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14618, "no_votes": 34870, "total_votes": 49488, "percent_yes": 29.53847397348852, "percent_no": 70.46152602651148, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.739273", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.604133", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall Measure G be approved, adopting the general plan proposed in the Measure as the official General Plan for the County of El Dorado, and specifying those aspects of the General Plan that can be amended by the Board of Supervisors without voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8340, "fingerprint": "2004|200400011|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400011|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "86d2eb4e37db0b55", "measure_id": "200400011", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Section 3.28.030 of the El Dorado County Ordinanace Code, which imposes a tax on short term occupants of hotels, motels and similar facilities in the unincorporated areas of El Dorado County, be amended to raise the amount of the tax charged from eight percent (8.0%) to ten percent (10.0%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30018, "no_votes": 20163, "total_votes": 50181, "percent_yes": 59.819453578047465, "percent_no": 40.180546421952535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.739543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.604312", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 3.28.030 of the El Dorado County Ordinanace Code, which imposes a tax on short term occupants of hotels, motels and similar facilities in the unincorporated areas of El Dorado County, be amended to raise the amount of the tax charged from eight percent (8.0%) to ten percent (10.0%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8341, "fingerprint": "2004|200400141|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400141|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "1ed6801182039cfb", "measure_id": "200400141", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve our schools, maintain small class sizes, improve student access to technology, support campus safety, retain and attract high quality teachers, and maintain programs including libraries, music, and art, shall Pioneer Union School District levy a tax of $75.00 per parcel for five years so long as a senior citizen (65 and older) and multiple parcel owner exemption is provided, no money is used for administrative salaries, and a citizens' oversight committee is established?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1034, "no_votes": 1029, "total_votes": 2063, "percent_yes": 50.12118274357732, "percent_no": 49.87881725642268, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.739813", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.604494", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve our schools, maintain small class sizes, improve student access to technology, support campus safety, retain and attract high quality teachers, and maintain programs including libraries, music, and art, shall Pioneer Union School District levy a tax of $75.00 per parcel for five years so long as a senior citizen (65 and older) and multiple parcel owner exemption is provided, no money is used for administrative salaries, and a citizens' oversight committee is established?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8343, "fingerprint": "2004|200400255|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400255|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "4ef950e555fe3a96", "measure_id": "200400255", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To sustain/improve quality programs for our schools, keep libraries staffed, reinstate instrumental music and elementary physical educaiton, sustain small class size and neighborhood schools, eliminate transportation fees, and insure qualified teachers, support staff, nurses, counselors, psychologists, and leadership personnel as long as fiscally viable, shall Lake Tahoe Unified School District collect $60/year per taxable parcel for six years with annual exemption for qualified seniors, an annual cost of living adjustment and independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3652, "no_votes": 2976, "total_votes": 6628, "percent_yes": 55.09957754978877, "percent_no": 44.90042245021123, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.740425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.604874", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To sustain/improve quality programs for our schools, keep libraries staffed, reinstate instrumental music and elementary physical educaiton, sustain small class size and neighborhood schools, eliminate transportation fees, and insure qualified teachers, support staff, nurses, counselors, psychologists, and leadership personnel as long as fiscally viable, shall Lake Tahoe Unified School District collect $60/year per taxable parcel for six years with annual exemption for qualified seniors, an annual cost of living adjustment and independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8352, "fingerprint": "2004|200400414|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400414|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "f3ab2bbc12551d22", "measure_id": "200400414", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a sales tax rate increase of one-half of one percent be adopted to help limit further budget cuts in the City's General Fund, that primarily supports fire protection, police protection, snow removal and street maintenance and repair?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3796, "no_votes": 2733, "total_votes": 6529, "percent_yes": 58.14060346147956, "percent_no": 41.85939653852044, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.743333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.606501", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a sales tax rate increase of one-half of one percent be adopted to help limit further budget cuts in the City's General Fund, that primarily supports fire protection, police protection, snow removal and street maintenance and repair?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8347, "fingerprint": "2004|200400293|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400293|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "31df1b57625b81b0", "measure_id": "200400293", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure U be adopted, which would amend Section 403 of the El Dorado County Charter to eliminate the requirement that the Board of Supervisors appoint an interim County Counsel to serve until April 1998?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34984, "no_votes": 31709, "total_votes": 66693, "percent_yes": 52.455280164335086, "percent_no": 47.544719835664914, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.741647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.605606", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure U be adopted, which would amend Section 403 of the El Dorado County Charter to eliminate the requirement that the Board of Supervisors appoint an interim County Counsel to serve until April 1998?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8348, "fingerprint": "2004|200400294|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400294|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "cd86710be87f09ed", "measure_id": "200400294", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure V be adopted, which would amend Section 202 of the El Dorado County Charter to provide that a Board member's term of office commences at noon on the first Monday after the January 1st succeeding their election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48858, "no_votes": 19082, "total_votes": 67940, "percent_yes": 71.91345304680601, "percent_no": 28.086546953193988, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.741918", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.605785", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure V be adopted, which would amend Section 202 of the El Dorado County Charter to provide that a Board member's term of office commences at noon on the first Monday after the January 1st succeeding their election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8349, "fingerprint": "2004|200400295|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400295|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ad9fe0e42d7223d3", "measure_id": "200400295", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure X be adopted, which would amend Section 205 of the El Dorado County Charter to eliminate the provision requiring that one meeting of the board of Supervisors per calendar year shall be held in each supervisorial district, and to add a new provision encouraging the Board of Supervisors to hold one meeting per calendar year in each district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35470, "no_votes": 33424, "total_votes": 68894, "percent_yes": 51.48488983075449, "percent_no": 48.51511016924551, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.742186", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.605966", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure X be adopted, which would amend Section 205 of the El Dorado County Charter to eliminate the provision requiring that one meeting of the board of Supervisors per calendar year shall be held in each supervisorial district, and to add a new provision encouraging the Board of Supervisors to hold one meeting per calendar year in each district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8350, "fingerprint": "2004|200400296|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400296|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a4d6db5eacf9bf29", "measure_id": "200400296", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure Y be adopted, which would amend Section 210(a)(3) of the El Dorado County Charter to eliminate the reference to the Court Executive Officer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36051, "no_votes": 26856, "total_votes": 62907, "percent_yes": 57.30840764938719, "percent_no": 42.69159235061281, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.742450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.606145", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure Y be adopted, which would amend Section 210(a)(3) of the El Dorado County Charter to eliminate the reference to the Court Executive Officer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8351, "fingerprint": "2004|200400297|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400297|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "8bb423e5924da00d", "measure_id": "200400297", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure Z be adopted amending El Dorado County Charter section 203 to clarify that if a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors occurs less than 90 or more than 120 days before a scheduled election, then a special election to fill the vacancy will be held not less than 90 or more than 120 days after the vacancy occurs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42456, "no_votes": 26045, "total_votes": 68501, "percent_yes": 61.97865724587962, "percent_no": 38.02134275412038, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.742968", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.606323", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure Z be adopted amending El Dorado County Charter section 203 to clarify that if a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors occurs less than 90 or more than 120 days before a scheduled election, then a special election to fill the vacancy will be held not less than 90 or more than 120 days after the vacancy occurs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11780, "fingerprint": "2004|200400298|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400298|FRESNO", "content_hash": "9083f60bde0318ed", "measure_id": "200400298", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall section 16 of the Fresno County Charter be amended to repeal the provision making the director of Public Works the \"ex officio county surveyor,\" and to enact a provision for the Director of Public Works to appoint a separate qualified county surveyor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75602, "no_votes": 121111, "total_votes": 196713, "percent_yes": 38.43264044572549, "percent_no": 61.56735955427451, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.704358", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.746481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.608332", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 16 of the Fresno County Charter be amended to repeal the provision making the director of Public Works the \"ex officio county surveyor,\" and to enact a provision for the Director of Public Works to appoint a separate qualified county surveyor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8357, "fingerprint": "2004|200400144|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400144|FRESNO", "content_hash": "afd0ccade4b99bb8", "measure_id": "200400144", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To purchase and construct facilities; modernize, renovate, improve, and construct additions to existing campuses; upgrade safety systems; enhance technology capabilities; and reduce overcrowding, shall Clovis Unified School District: Acquire, construct, furnish and equip new School/District facilities, including new sites and site improvements at existing campuses; Construct three new elementary schools, one intermediate and one high school: Acquire an elementary school site; and issue $168 million of bonds for the above, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24836, "no_votes": 14942, "total_votes": 39778, "percent_yes": 62.436522700990494, "percent_no": 37.563477299009506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.744817", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.607415", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To purchase and construct facilities; modernize, renovate, improve, and construct additions to existing campuses; upgrade safety systems; enhance technology capabilities; and reduce overcrowding, shall Clovis Unified School District: Acquire, construct, furnish and equip new School/District facilities, including new sites and site improvements at existing campuses; Construct three new elementary schools, one intermediate and one high school: Acquire an elementary school site; and issue $168 million of bonds for the above, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11781, "fingerprint": "2004|200400299|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400299|FRESNO", "content_hash": "56a0c89ffb999aa4", "measure_id": "200400299", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-006 of Fresno County Board Of Supervisors be approved to provide needed funding to: maintain local public libraries; continue to expand collection of books and materials; continue restored operating hours on weekdays and weekends; continue expanded literacy and other services for children, adults and seniors, by levying a successor sales tax on the same terms as the existing tax, at the rate of one-eighth of one percent for a maximum of 7 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 159279, "no_votes": 63945, "total_votes": 223224, "percent_yes": 71.35388667885174, "percent_no": 28.646113321148263, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.704627", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.746850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.608512", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-006 of Fresno County Board Of Supervisors be approved to provide needed funding to: maintain local public libraries; continue to expand collection of books and materials; continue restored operating hours on weekdays and weekends; continue expanded literacy and other services for children, adults and seniors, by levying a successor sales tax on the same terms as the existing tax, at the rate of one-eighth of one percent for a maximum of 7 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8361, "fingerprint": "2004|200400148|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400148|FRESNO", "content_hash": "c2a90dce41c6b152", "measure_id": "200400148", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To receive State matching funds; make health and safety improvements including improvements to restrooms, fire and life-safety systems; remove hazardous materials including asbestos and lead based paint; upgrade interior lighting; refinish/repair interior walls, wall coverings and floor coverings; repair/replace countertops; upgrade/replace classroom heating/cooling systems; install tackable wall surfaces and marker boards; and otherwise modernize and equip classrooms; shall Washington Colony Elementary School District issue $400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 350, "no_votes": 153, "total_votes": 503, "percent_yes": 69.58250497017893, "percent_no": 30.41749502982107, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.746105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.608149", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To receive State matching funds; make health and safety improvements including improvements to restrooms, fire and life-safety systems; remove hazardous materials including asbestos and lead based paint; upgrade interior lighting; refinish/repair interior walls, wall coverings and floor coverings; repair/replace countertops; upgrade/replace classroom heating/cooling systems; install tackable wall surfaces and marker boards; and otherwise modernize and equip classrooms; shall Washington Colony Elementary School District issue $400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11782, "fingerprint": "2004|200400300|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400300|FRESNO", "content_hash": "341c3c86e80313cc", "measure_id": "200400300", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall section 44(2)(b) of the Fresno County Charter be amended to permit a thirty party neutral in lieu of the Civil Service Commission to reinstate on appeal employees and officers dismissed for cause by the department head? Shall section 44(2)(f) of the Fresno County Charter be amended to expand the Board of Supervisors' authority to exempt from the civil service system department heads, assistant department heads, and senior management and other classifications?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59453, "no_votes": 138252, "total_votes": 197705, "percent_yes": 30.07157128044308, "percent_no": 69.92842871955692, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.704897", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.747148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.608703", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 44(2)(b) of the Fresno County Charter be amended to permit a thirty party neutral in lieu of the Civil Service Commission to reinstate on appeal employees and officers dismissed for cause by the department head? Shall section 44(2)(f) of the Fresno County Charter be amended to expand the Board of Supervisors' authority to exempt from the civil service system department heads, assistant department heads, and senior management and other classifications?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8353, "fingerprint": "2004|200400066|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400066|FRESNO", "content_hash": "0e40654f295fe073", "measure_id": "200400066", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1 of Ordinance 685 be adopted, establishing a .75% City transactions and use tax for a period of 10 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 572, "no_votes": 1068, "total_votes": 1640, "percent_yes": 34.8780487804878, "percent_no": 65.1219512195122, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.743640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.606685", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1 of Ordinance 685 be adopted, establishing a .75% City transactions and use tax for a period of 10 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8354, "fingerprint": "2004|200400067|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400067|FRESNO", "content_hash": "2562c904279d80b5", "measure_id": "200400067", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 4 of Ordinance 685 be adopted, establishing an 8% City utility users tax for a period of 10 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 379, "no_votes": 1241, "total_votes": 1620, "percent_yes": 23.39506172839506, "percent_no": 76.60493827160494, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.743933", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.606868", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 4 of Ordinance 685 be adopted, establishing an 8% City utility users tax for a period of 10 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8355, "fingerprint": "2004|200400068|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400068|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3ea192a8fa954e40", "measure_id": "200400068", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 2 of Ordinance 685 be adopted, increasing the hotel-motel room tax to 10% for a period of 10 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 758, "no_votes": 879, "total_votes": 1637, "percent_yes": 46.304215027489306, "percent_no": 53.695784972510694, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.744220", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.607055", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 2 of Ordinance 685 be adopted, increasing the hotel-motel room tax to 10% for a period of 10 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8362, "fingerprint": "2004|200400301|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400301|FRESNO", "content_hash": "ff3769e9376edba3", "measure_id": "200400301", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-015 of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors be approved to provide funding for the support of tourism within Fresno County by imposing a transient occupancy tax on occupants of hotel rooms and other short-term rentals in the unincorporated area at the rate of six percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 96723, "no_votes": 122189, "total_votes": 218912, "percent_yes": 44.18350752813916, "percent_no": 55.81649247186084, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.747436", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.608885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-015 of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors be approved to provide funding for the support of tourism within Fresno County by imposing a transient occupancy tax on occupants of hotel rooms and other short-term rentals in the unincorporated area at the rate of six percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11784, "fingerprint": "2004|200400617|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400617|FRESNO", "content_hash": "c561f29afb456e62", "measure_id": "200400617", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Kerman Unified School District acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and school facilities, improve student access to computers and modern technology, construct new classrooms and replace temporary portable classrooms, build libraries/media centers, add restrooms to meet State requirements, and qualify the District to receive State-matching funds by issuing $11,000,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2407, "no_votes": 980, "total_votes": 3387, "percent_yes": 71.06583997638027, "percent_no": 28.934160023619725, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.707025", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.749701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.610159", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Kerman Unified School District acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and school facilities, improve student access to computers and modern technology, construct new classrooms and replace temporary portable classrooms, build libraries/media centers, add restrooms to meet State requirements, and qualify the District to receive State-matching funds by issuing $11,000,000 in bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8356, "fingerprint": "2004|200400143|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400143|FRESNO", "content_hash": "753d5e5c1620ca08", "measure_id": "200400143", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To accommodate projected student growth, provide needed improvements at existing schools, enhance student access to technology and provide adequate district service facilities, shall Central Unified School District construct, furnish and equip: two new elementary schools; one new middle school; an athletic stadium; a district transportation facility; various improvements at existing schools; and issue $40 million of bonds for these purposes at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audit and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5174, "no_votes": 3320, "total_votes": 8494, "percent_yes": 60.91358606074876, "percent_no": 39.08641393925124, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.744524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.607233", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To accommodate projected student growth, provide needed improvements at existing schools, enhance student access to technology and provide adequate district service facilities, shall Central Unified School District construct, furnish and equip: two new elementary schools; one new middle school; an athletic stadium; a district transportation facility; various improvements at existing schools; and issue $40 million of bonds for these purposes at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audit and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8367, "fingerprint": "2004|200400616|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400616|FRESNO", "content_hash": "356c43e58710b601", "measure_id": "200400616", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety, repair neighborhood schools/classrooms, and alleviate overcrowding by: Fixing leaky roofs; Removing asbestos; Upgrading fire safety, outdated plumbing, sewers, electrical wiring for computer technology; acquiring land for elementary schools; Repairing/expanding/constructing/equipping classrooms, labs, libraries and other school facilities; Shall Fowler Unified School District issue $21,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1757, "no_votes": 467, "total_votes": 2224, "percent_yes": 79.00179856115108, "percent_no": 20.998201438848923, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.749268", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.609978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety, repair neighborhood schools/classrooms, and alleviate overcrowding by: Fixing leaky roofs; Removing asbestos; Upgrading fire safety, outdated plumbing, sewers, electrical wiring for computer technology; acquiring land for elementary schools; Repairing/expanding/constructing/equipping classrooms, labs, libraries and other school facilities; Shall Fowler Unified School District issue $21,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8366, "fingerprint": "2004|200400615|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400615|FRESNO", "content_hash": "e50e787d80927401", "measure_id": "200400615", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and continue the high quality of education and recreation, shall the Big Creek Elementary School District replace, modernize and update the pool facility to include site preparation and demolition, a new six-lane, 25 yard pool with mechanical equipment, pool decks and drainage, fencing, lighting, deck and competitive equipment, American with Disabilities Act requirements, and retrofit/modernize the sewer system through the issue of $1,400,000 in bonds at legal interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 167, "no_votes": 79, "total_votes": 246, "percent_yes": 67.88617886178862, "percent_no": 32.11382113821138, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.748963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.609790", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and continue the high quality of education and recreation, shall the Big Creek Elementary School District replace, modernize and update the pool facility to include site preparation and demolition, a new six-lane, 25 yard pool with mechanical equipment, pool decks and drainage, fencing, lighting, deck and competitive equipment, American with Disabilities Act requirements, and retrofit/modernize the sewer system through the issue of $1,400,000 in bonds at legal interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11783, "fingerprint": "2004|200400416|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400416|FRESNO", "content_hash": "8f912f985d6d3fa8", "measure_id": "200400416", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City Charter be amended to add a paragraph (F) to Section 2.02 of the City Charter to read as follows: \"The City shall establish residential growth control regulations which will place a limit on the number of residential building permits that may be issued annually.\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3209, "no_votes": 730, "total_votes": 3939, "percent_yes": 81.46737750698146, "percent_no": 18.532622493018536, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.705941", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.748312", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.609424", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City Charter be amended to add a paragraph (F) to Section 2.02 of the City Charter to read as follows: \"The City shall establish residential growth control regulations which will place a limit on the number of residential building permits that may be issued annually.\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8358, "fingerprint": "2004|200400145|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400145|FRESNO", "content_hash": "79943e5693e710d1", "measure_id": "200400145", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for skilled jobs, four-year colleges, train nurses, police, firefighters, accommodate population growth by: Repairing, upgrading leaky roofs, aging classrooms, computer wiring, ventilation, plumbing, sewers; Improving fire safety, security; Removing hazardous materials; Acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, training/education centers in Hanford, Tulare, Visalia; shall Sequoias Community College District issue $95,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62, "no_votes": 80, "total_votes": 142, "percent_yes": 43.66197183098591, "percent_no": 56.33802816901409, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.745231", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.607603", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for skilled jobs, four-year colleges, train nurses, police, firefighters, accommodate population growth by: Repairing, upgrading leaky roofs, aging classrooms, computer wiring, ventilation, plumbing, sewers; Improving fire safety, security; Removing hazardous materials; Acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, training/education centers in Hanford, Tulare, Visalia; shall Sequoias Community College District issue $95,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8359, "fingerprint": "2004|200400146|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400146|FRESNO", "content_hash": "038c0dd2ddddfd58", "measure_id": "200400146", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Repair our aging schools, relieve overcrowding, improve the learning environment and keep our children safe and healthy by: Modernizing or replacing classrooms, restrooms, locker rooms, offices and site work.  Improving school safety, security, energy efficiency and accessibility. Building new classrooms, gymnasium, multipurpose room, offices, restrooms and library.  Shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $6,400,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, independent audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60, "no_votes": 82, "total_votes": 142, "percent_yes": 42.25352112676056, "percent_no": 57.74647887323944, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.745523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.607788", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Repair our aging schools, relieve overcrowding, improve the learning environment and keep our children safe and healthy by: Modernizing or replacing classrooms, restrooms, locker rooms, offices and site work.  Improving school safety, security, energy efficiency and accessibility. Building new classrooms, gymnasium, multipurpose room, offices, restrooms and library.  Shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $6,400,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, independent audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8368, "fingerprint": "2004|200400618|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400618|FRESNO", "content_hash": "378595d0677e6599", "measure_id": "200400618", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To raise money to build a new events center/gym at Parlier High School, a gym at Parlier Junior High, expand the multi-purpose room/cafeteria at Parlier High, and purchase land for a future school campus, shall Parlier Unified School District issue and sell up to $4,500,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate, with none of the money going for salaries or other operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1152, "no_votes": 451, "total_votes": 1603, "percent_yes": 71.86525265127885, "percent_no": 28.13474734872115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.750078", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.610340", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To raise money to build a new events center/gym at Parlier High School, a gym at Parlier Junior High, expand the multi-purpose room/cafeteria at Parlier High, and purchase land for a future school campus, shall Parlier Unified School District issue and sell up to $4,500,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate, with none of the money going for salaries or other operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8360, "fingerprint": "2004|200400147|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400147|FRESNO", "content_hash": "1f68f08df29a2972", "measure_id": "200400147", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Kingsburg Joint Union Elementary School District acquire a site and construct a new elementary school, upgrade fire alarm systems, repair leaking roofs, upgrade electrical wiring for computers, install security locks, upgrade heating, ventilation and cooling systems, repair, construct and equip classrooms, restrooms, and other facilities; qualify for State matching funds by issuing $7,500,000 of bonds at legal rates with guaranteed annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for staff salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1985, "no_votes": 811, "total_votes": 2796, "percent_yes": 70.99427753934192, "percent_no": 29.005722460658077, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.745813", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.607968", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Kingsburg Joint Union Elementary School District acquire a site and construct a new elementary school, upgrade fire alarm systems, repair leaking roofs, upgrade electrical wiring for computers, install security locks, upgrade heating, ventilation and cooling systems, repair, construct and equip classrooms, restrooms, and other facilities; qualify for State matching funds by issuing $7,500,000 of bonds at legal rates with guaranteed annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for staff salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8365, "fingerprint": "2004|200400417|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400417|FRESNO", "content_hash": "faed5d9314d64edc", "measure_id": "200400417", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The Ordinance increases Transactions and Use taxes from 0.9600% to 1.46%.  Transactions tax is charged on personal property sold by retailers within City limits.  Use tax is imposed on storage, use or consumption of personal property purchased from retailers within City limits.  The State Board of Equalization administers and enforces the Ordinance.  Penalties are included for failure to pay the taxes and for providing false tax returns.  The Ordinance must receive simple majority approval.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1652, "no_votes": 2446, "total_votes": 4098, "percent_yes": 40.31234748657882, "percent_no": 59.68765251342118, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.748671", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.609608", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The Ordinance increases Transactions and Use taxes from 0.9600% to 1.46%.  Transactions tax is charged on personal property sold by retailers within City limits.  Use tax is imposed on storage, use or consumption of personal property purchased from retailers within City limits.  The State Board of Equalization administers and enforces the Ordinance.  Penalties are included for failure to pay the taxes and for providing false tax returns.  The Ordinance must receive simple majority approval.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8364, "fingerprint": "2004|200400415|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400415|FRESNO", "content_hash": "c48a17fd3a5ff06e", "measure_id": "200400415", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Kerman Institute a Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) for motel/hotel users staying in the City at a rate of 8% to their motel/hotel room rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1006, "no_votes": 1020, "total_votes": 2026, "percent_yes": 49.65449160908193, "percent_no": 50.34550839091807, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.748012", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.609246", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Kerman Institute a Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) for motel/hotel users staying in the City at a rate of 8% to their motel/hotel room rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8363, "fingerprint": "2004|200400302|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400302|FRESNO", "content_hash": "065ee53e57bc01e2", "measure_id": "200400302", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To help ensure survival of the Chaffee Zoo by providing necessary funding to repair and restore the zoo, bring back large animal exhibits, further revitalize the zoo, and preserve the zoo's Species Survival Plan and ongoing Education Program, shall Fresno County voters approve a one-tenth of one percent sales tax for ten years with all net proceeds dedicated exclusively to the Chaffee Zoo?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 171035, "no_votes": 61922, "total_votes": 232957, "percent_yes": 73.41912885210576, "percent_no": 26.580871147894243, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.747725", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.609064", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help ensure survival of the Chaffee Zoo by providing necessary funding to repair and restore the zoo, bring back large animal exhibits, further revitalize the zoo, and preserve the zoo's Species Survival Plan and ongoing Education Program, shall Fresno County voters approve a one-tenth of one percent sales tax for ten years with all net proceeds dedicated exclusively to the Chaffee Zoo?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8374, "fingerprint": "2004|200400245|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400245|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "0f9fc410e7222b8f", "measure_id": "200400245", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the transaction and use tax in the City of Trinidad be increaded by 1% for a period of not more than four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 67, "no_votes": 52, "total_votes": 119, "percent_yes": 56.30252100840336, "percent_no": 43.69747899159664, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.751868", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.611440", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the transaction and use tax in the City of Trinidad be increaded by 1% for a period of not more than four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8373, "fingerprint": "2004|200400149|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400149|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "d0edc6b2d7d8f52b", "measure_id": "200400149", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of maintaining and restoring academic and educational programs by levying a special tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of six years, beginning July 1, 2004 and increase its appropriation limit by the amount of revenue generated by that speical tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1844, "no_votes": 1578, "total_votes": 3422, "percent_yes": 53.88661601402689, "percent_no": 46.11338398597311, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.751581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.611259", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of maintaining and restoring academic and educational programs by levying a special tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of six years, beginning July 1, 2004 and increase its appropriation limit by the amount of revenue generated by that speical tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8370, "fingerprint": "2004|200400013|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400013|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "e870be67ddcb2503", "measure_id": "200400013", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Paul Gallegos be recalled (removed) from office of District Attorney?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20517, "no_votes": 32680, "total_votes": 53197, "percent_yes": 38.56796435889242, "percent_no": 61.43203564110758, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.750715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.610714", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Paul Gallegos be recalled (removed) from office of District Attorney?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8371, "fingerprint": "2004|200400069|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400069|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ac5a2eeeb68f0a9b", "measure_id": "200400069", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arcata adopt a utility users tax (Resolution No. 034-17) which shall impose a three percent (3%) general tax on the use of certain utility services which shall go into effect December 1, 2004, at which time the City's current three percent (3%) utility users tax will expire.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5249, "no_votes": 2628, "total_votes": 7877, "percent_yes": 66.63704456011172, "percent_no": 33.36295543988828, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.751003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.610897", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arcata adopt a utility users tax (Resolution No. 034-17) which shall impose a three percent (3%) general tax on the use of certain utility services which shall go into effect December 1, 2004, at which time the City's current three percent (3%) utility users tax will expire.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8372, "fingerprint": "2004|200400070|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400070|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200400070", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 308, "no_votes": 210, "total_votes": 518, "percent_yes": 59.45945945945946, "percent_no": 40.54054054054054, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.751289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.611077", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8369, "fingerprint": "2004|200400012|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400012|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "17901a259a5a1491", "measure_id": "200400012", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special tax be levied for fire protection and emergency medical services by the Fieldbrook Community Services District of $42.00 per assessor's parcel in Zone Two (2) in the District, such tax to continue for ten (10) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 548, "no_votes": 87, "total_votes": 635, "percent_yes": 86.2992125984252, "percent_no": 13.7007874015748, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.750421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.610521", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax be levied for fire protection and emergency medical services by the Fieldbrook Community Services District of $42.00 per assessor's parcel in Zone Two (2) in the District, such tax to continue for ten (10) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8380, "fingerprint": "2004|200400619|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400619|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "6755c6569ffa5266", "measure_id": "200400619", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Loleta Union School Elementary School District modernize classrooms, including improvements to lighting and heating & air conditioning systems; improvements to classrooms including replacement of windows and cabinetry, abatement of asbestos, new whiteboards; replacement of floor and wall coverings; make health and safety improvements including new restrooms for upper grade wings; upgrade kitchen facilities and improve computer network environment and student access to technology by issuing $456,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 422, "no_votes": 199, "total_votes": 621, "percent_yes": 67.9549114331723, "percent_no": 32.0450885668277, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.753657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.612558", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Loleta Union School Elementary School District modernize classrooms, including improvements to lighting and heating & air conditioning systems; improvements to classrooms including replacement of windows and cabinetry, abatement of asbestos, new whiteboards; replacement of floor and wall coverings; make health and safety improvements including new restrooms for upper grade wings; upgrade kitchen facilities and improve computer network environment and student access to technology by issuing $456,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8375, "fingerprint": "2004|200400303|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400303|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "543fe21ccab5d101", "measure_id": "200400303", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a temporary one percent sales tax, pursuant to County Ordinance No. 2323 and Resolution No. 04-51, a general tax, with these restrictions: The sales tax can only be used to pay for local services; The tax will terminate on June 30, 2009; and This Board of Supervisors will immediately repeal the tax if the State attempts to redirect or take the sales tax revenue away from Humboldt County.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18684, "no_votes": 43545, "total_votes": 62229, "percent_yes": 30.024586607530253, "percent_no": 69.97541339246975, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.752156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.611630", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a temporary one percent sales tax, pursuant to County Ordinance No. 2323 and Resolution No. 04-51, a general tax, with these restrictions: The sales tax can only be used to pay for local services; The tax will terminate on June 30, 2009; and This Board of Supervisors will immediately repeal the tax if the State attempts to redirect or take the sales tax revenue away from Humboldt County.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8376, "fingerprint": "2004|200400304|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400304|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "f704b2fa214a9099", "measure_id": "200400304", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Humboldt County ordinance titled \"Ordinance Prohibiting Growing of Genetically Modified Organisms\" be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21444, "no_votes": 39258, "total_votes": 60702, "percent_yes": 35.32667786893347, "percent_no": 64.67332213106653, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.752505", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.611814", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Humboldt County ordinance titled \"Ordinance Prohibiting Growing of Genetically Modified Organisms\" be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8377, "fingerprint": "2004|200400418|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400418|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "29a64c1a596dbe17", "measure_id": "200400418", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council of the City of Blue Lake adopt Ordinance No. 474 updating rates for business licenses within the City of Blue Lake to supplement general tax revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 296, "no_votes": 297, "total_votes": 593, "percent_yes": 49.915682967959526, "percent_no": 50.084317032040474, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.752793", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.611998", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council of the City of Blue Lake adopt Ordinance No. 474 updating rates for business licenses within the City of Blue Lake to supplement general tax revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8378, "fingerprint": "2004|200400419|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400419|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "1ef388aea8152226", "measure_id": "200400419", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors eliminate the elective office of mayor and thereby reestablish the procedure of selection of mayor by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 171, "no_votes": 626, "total_votes": 797, "percent_yes": 21.45545796737766, "percent_no": 78.54454203262233, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.753080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.612184", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors eliminate the elective office of mayor and thereby reestablish the procedure of selection of mayor by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8379, "fingerprint": "2004|200400420|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400420|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "e23fc59a5ad982c8", "measure_id": "200400420", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Ferndale increase the business license fees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 459, "no_votes": 331, "total_votes": 790, "percent_yes": 58.10126582278481, "percent_no": 41.89873417721519, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.753367", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.612377", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Ferndale increase the business license fees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8381, "fingerprint": "2004|200400620|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400620|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "0951ae1b76f2f45f", "measure_id": "200400620", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To strengthen local job and vocational training programs, and increase academic classes for students with 2-year and 4-year college goals by: Adding classrooms and tech labs; Renovating unsafe and deteriorating campus buildings; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, furnishing and equipping college facilities; Shall the Redwoods Community College District issue $40,320,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with tough accountabillity safeguards, including an independent Citizens Overisight Committee and annual audits--with no money used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39807, "no_votes": 22252, "total_votes": 62059, "percent_yes": 64.1437986432266, "percent_no": 35.8562013567734, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.754001", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.612745", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To strengthen local job and vocational training programs, and increase academic classes for students with 2-year and 4-year college goals by: Adding classrooms and tech labs; Renovating unsafe and deteriorating campus buildings; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, furnishing and equipping college facilities; Shall the Redwoods Community College District issue $40,320,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with tough accountabillity safeguards, including an independent Citizens Overisight Committee and annual audits--with no money used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8384, "fingerprint": "2004|200400151|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400151|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "a8251bf936b85db7", "measure_id": "200400151", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To train local residents for jobs, prepare students for four-year colleges, accommodate increasing student enrollment at College of the Desert by: expanding nursing/police/fire-fighting training facilities; repairing sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls, plumbing, electrical systems; Upgrading/adding classrooms for computer technology; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites classrooms; shall Desert Community College District issue $346,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 209, "no_votes": 197, "total_votes": 406, "percent_yes": 51.47783251231527, "percent_no": 48.52216748768473, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.754959", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.613306", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To train local residents for jobs, prepare students for four-year colleges, accommodate increasing student enrollment at College of the Desert by: expanding nursing/police/fire-fighting training facilities; repairing sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls, plumbing, electrical systems; Upgrading/adding classrooms for computer technology; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites classrooms; shall Desert Community College District issue $346,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8382, "fingerprint": "2004|200400071|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400071|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "bcfa291eac769b66", "measure_id": "200400071", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1005 be adopted to increase the rate of the transient occupancy tax (\"hotel bed tax\") from 7% to 10%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1687, "no_votes": 1696, "total_votes": 3383, "percent_yes": 49.86698196866686, "percent_no": 50.13301803133314, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.754378", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.612935", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1005 be adopted to increase the rate of the transient occupancy tax (\"hotel bed tax\") from 7% to 10%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8385, "fingerprint": "2004|200400152|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400152|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "d8ff58c4ae19f7c3", "measure_id": "200400152", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct and equip a new middle school including joint use facilities, convert and equip existing intermediate school for high school use, with remaining funds used for purchase and construction of a new elementary school site, shall Imperial Unified School District be authorized to issue $12,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits with no funds expended on teacher and administrator salaries and to appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1265, "no_votes": 558, "total_votes": 1823, "percent_yes": 69.3911135490949, "percent_no": 30.608886450905104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.755248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.613489", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct and equip a new middle school including joint use facilities, convert and equip existing intermediate school for high school use, with remaining funds used for purchase and construction of a new elementary school site, shall Imperial Unified School District be authorized to issue $12,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits with no funds expended on teacher and administrator salaries and to appoint an Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8383, "fingerprint": "2004|200400150|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400150|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "e11e58b8012780da", "measure_id": "200400150", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build new schools to relieve overcrowding, expand and renovate the high school, improve classroom safety, build additional classrooms, upgrade or replace outdated bathrooms, plumbing, and electrical systems, improve libraries and computer centers, renovate, acquire, construct and modernize school facilities, and permit the elimination of the 1991 Mello-Roos tax, shall the Calexico Unified School District issue $30,000,000 in bonds at authorized interest rates, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to monitor the expenditure of funds.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2680, "no_votes": 882, "total_votes": 3562, "percent_yes": 75.23862998315553, "percent_no": 24.761370016844467, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.754670", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.613118", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build new schools to relieve overcrowding, expand and renovate the high school, improve classroom safety, build additional classrooms, upgrade or replace outdated bathrooms, plumbing, and electrical systems, improve libraries and computer centers, renovate, acquire, construct and modernize school facilities, and permit the elimination of the 1991 Mello-Roos tax, shall the Calexico Unified School District issue $30,000,000 in bonds at authorized interest rates, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to monitor the expenditure of funds.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8386, "fingerprint": "2004|200400421|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400421|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "958a396ead5fc4d9", "measure_id": "200400421", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1012 be adopted to impose the City of Calexico Emergency Communications and Public Safety Hotel Bed Tax at the rate of 3%, with tax proceeds to be expended exclusively on authorized emergency communications costs and for vehicles, equipment and training for emergency services personnel, subject to the accountability measures provided in the Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3616, "no_votes": 2410, "total_votes": 6026, "percent_yes": 60.00663790242283, "percent_no": 39.99336209757717, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.755534", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.613678", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1012 be adopted to impose the City of Calexico Emergency Communications and Public Safety Hotel Bed Tax at the rate of 3%, with tax proceeds to be expended exclusively on authorized emergency communications costs and for vehicles, equipment and training for emergency services personnel, subject to the accountability measures provided in the Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8387, "fingerprint": "2004|200400621|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400621|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "e15354baa31d8a87", "measure_id": "200400621", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs, four year colleges, and better serve the community by training nurses, law enforcement, and construction trades by building a new science and technology facility, modernizing all buildings, removing asbestos; upgrading security, improving student safety, repairing leaky roofs, plumbing, air conditioning; upgrading wiring for computer technology, shall the Imperial Community College District issue $58,600,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20176, "no_votes": 11540, "total_votes": 31716, "percent_yes": 63.61457939210493, "percent_no": 36.38542060789507, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.755824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.613860", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs, four year colleges, and better serve the community by training nurses, law enforcement, and construction trades by building a new science and technology facility, modernizing all buildings, removing asbestos; upgrading security, improving student safety, repairing leaky roofs, plumbing, air conditioning; upgrading wiring for computer technology, shall the Imperial Community College District issue $58,600,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8388, "fingerprint": "2004|200400305|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400305|INYO", "content_hash": "ce8ae30994c45412", "measure_id": "200400305", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County ordinance entitled \"The Tourists' Fair Share Act\" which increase the transient occupancy tax to 12% and expands it to cover spaces at campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3755, "no_votes": 4486, "total_votes": 8241, "percent_yes": 45.56485863366096, "percent_no": 54.43514136633904, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.756170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.614046", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County ordinance entitled \"The Tourists' Fair Share Act\" which increase the transient occupancy tax to 12% and expands it to cover spaces at campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8389, "fingerprint": "2004|200400306|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400306|INYO", "content_hash": "dba678708f5324f2", "measure_id": "200400306", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County ordinance increasing the transactions and use tax by one-half of one percent (0.50%) for a period of six (6) years, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2990, "no_votes": 5157, "total_votes": 8147, "percent_yes": 36.70062599729962, "percent_no": 63.29937400270038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.756462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.614231", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County ordinance increasing the transactions and use tax by one-half of one percent (0.50%) for a period of six (6) years, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8398, "fingerprint": "2004|200400158|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400158|KERN", "content_hash": "5e95692575fe7cbb", "measure_id": "200400158", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education at Taft College, shall the West Kern Community College District be authorized to upgrade and expand the campus, provide vocational labs and programs in science and healthcare to produce a trained workforce, improve access to computers and technology, construct a library media center for community use, and build classrooms, by issuing $39,800,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher or administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2039, "no_votes": 1470, "total_votes": 3509, "percent_yes": 58.10772299800513, "percent_no": 41.89227700199487, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.759245", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.615952", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education at Taft College, shall the West Kern Community College District be authorized to upgrade and expand the campus, provide vocational labs and programs in science and healthcare to produce a trained workforce, improve access to computers and technology, construct a library media center for community use, and build classrooms, by issuing $39,800,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher or administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8396, "fingerprint": "2004|200400156|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400156|KERN", "content_hash": "4871701d30ad6618", "measure_id": "200400156", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the McFarland Unified School District be authorized to construct a new K-6 school to accommodate growth, modernize classrooms, improve health and safety conditions, construct a central kitchen, improve access to modern technology and make the District eligible to receive $7.7 million in State-matching funds by issuing $8.3 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 649, "no_votes": 184, "total_votes": 833, "percent_yes": 77.91116446578631, "percent_no": 22.088835534213686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.758547", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.615575", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the McFarland Unified School District be authorized to construct a new K-6 school to accommodate growth, modernize classrooms, improve health and safety conditions, construct a central kitchen, improve access to modern technology and make the District eligible to receive $7.7 million in State-matching funds by issuing $8.3 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8393, "fingerprint": "2004|200400153|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400153|KERN", "content_hash": "fbcd6d8a55aa8d6f", "measure_id": "200400153", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Arvin Union School District be authorized to construct a new elementary school, modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, expand and upgrade school facilities, including constructing new classrooms, upgrading inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to modern technology, renovate schools and qualify the District to receive $8.75 million in State-matching funds by issuing $11.0 million of bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 854, "no_votes": 251, "total_votes": 1105, "percent_yes": 77.28506787330318, "percent_no": 22.714932126696823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.757624", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.615024", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Arvin Union School District be authorized to construct a new elementary school, modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, expand and upgrade school facilities, including constructing new classrooms, upgrading inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to modern technology, renovate schools and qualify the District to receive $8.75 million in State-matching funds by issuing $11.0 million of bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8394, "fingerprint": "2004|200400154|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400154|KERN", "content_hash": "7fff3c18c9c4d421", "measure_id": "200400154", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education of Elk Hills Elementary School District, modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, including fire alarm systems, repair roofs, upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to computer technology, repair and improve student support facilities, fix plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, shall the District issue $7,905,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring a citizens' oversight committee and annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54, "no_votes": 18, "total_votes": 72, "percent_yes": 75.0, "percent_no": 25.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.757971", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.615208", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education of Elk Hills Elementary School District, modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, including fire alarm systems, repair roofs, upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to computer technology, repair and improve student support facilities, fix plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, shall the District issue $7,905,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring a citizens' oversight committee and annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8395, "fingerprint": "2004|200400155|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400155|KERN", "content_hash": "f41276e60ec89c8f", "measure_id": "200400155", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Kernville Union Elementary School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, improve health and safety conditions including upgrading fire alarm systems, making handicapped accessibility improvements, renovating electrical systems to provide modern technology, upgrade plumbing, replace roofing, and make the District eligible to receive $2,400,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $5,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits and oversight by a citizens' oversight committee and NO monies for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2559, "no_votes": 1211, "total_votes": 3770, "percent_yes": 67.87798408488064, "percent_no": 32.12201591511936, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.758260", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.615392", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Kernville Union Elementary School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, improve health and safety conditions including upgrading fire alarm systems, making handicapped accessibility improvements, renovating electrical systems to provide modern technology, upgrade plumbing, replace roofing, and make the District eligible to receive $2,400,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $5,600,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits and oversight by a citizens' oversight committee and NO monies for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8397, "fingerprint": "2004|200400157|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400157|KERN", "content_hash": "3fc2b0f6741d6c3e", "measure_id": "200400157", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Midway Elementary District modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to modern technology, construct and expand student support facilities, upgrade plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, issue $7,800,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring a citizens' oversight committee and annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 93, "no_votes": 44, "total_votes": 137, "percent_yes": 67.88321167883211, "percent_no": 32.11678832116789, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.758892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.615762", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Midway Elementary District modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to modern technology, construct and expand student support facilities, upgrade plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, issue $7,800,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring a citizens' oversight committee and annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8392, "fingerprint": "2004|200400072|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400072|KERN", "content_hash": "d34c007a08191200", "measure_id": "200400072", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a city-wide special tax of $85.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of five (5) fiscal years beginning July 1, 2004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1271, "no_votes": 733, "total_votes": 2004, "percent_yes": 63.423153692614775, "percent_no": 36.576846307385225, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.757325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.614836", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a city-wide special tax of $85.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of five (5) fiscal years beginning July 1, 2004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8390, "fingerprint": "2004|200400014|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400014|KERN", "content_hash": "d49b767804886256", "measure_id": "200400014", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2004-02 of the Rosamond Community Services District be adopted and approved to establish and authorize the levying of a special tax in the amount of $45.00 per fiscal year for each developed parcel and for each mobile home listed in Kern County Tax Roll 6 and $20.00 per fiscal year for each undeveloped parcel that are within Rosamond Community Services District boundaries to finance public parks and recreation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 823, "no_votes": 1508, "total_votes": 2331, "percent_yes": 35.3067353067353, "percent_no": 64.6932646932647, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.756750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.614415", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2004-02 of the Rosamond Community Services District be adopted and approved to establish and authorize the levying of a special tax in the amount of $45.00 per fiscal year for each developed parcel and for each mobile home listed in Kern County Tax Roll 6 and $20.00 per fiscal year for each undeveloped parcel that are within Rosamond Community Services District boundaries to finance public parks and recreation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8391, "fingerprint": "2004|200400015|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400015|KERN", "content_hash": "85a50de39b7b3b82", "measure_id": "200400015", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2004-03 of the Rosamond Community Services District be adopted to authorize the levying of a special tax in the amount of $24.00 per fiscal year for each parcel specified in the Ordinance to finance street lighting and shall the special tax be increased on July 1 of each fiscal year by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside area not to exceed two percent (2%) each year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 762, "no_votes": 1554, "total_votes": 2316, "percent_yes": 32.90155440414508, "percent_no": 67.09844559585491, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.757039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.614611", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2004-03 of the Rosamond Community Services District be adopted to authorize the levying of a special tax in the amount of $24.00 per fiscal year for each parcel specified in the Ordinance to finance street lighting and shall the special tax be increased on July 1 of each fiscal year by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside area not to exceed two percent (2%) each year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8399, "fingerprint": "2004|200400261|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400261|KERN", "content_hash": "cba4e1dba04f7e2e", "measure_id": "200400261", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Edison (Elementary) School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and modernize school facilities, improve health and safety, repair and modernize outdated classrooms, upgrade electrical systems and improve access to computers and technology, construct a multipurpose room/gym at Orangewood for school and community use, and make the District eligible to receive over $2,000,000 in state grants, by issuing $6,000,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures, at interest rates below legal limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 439, "no_votes": 87, "total_votes": 526, "percent_yes": 83.46007604562737, "percent_no": 16.539923954372625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-05-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.759533", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.616137", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Edison (Elementary) School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and modernize school facilities, improve health and safety, repair and modernize outdated classrooms, upgrade electrical systems and improve access to computers and technology, construct a multipurpose room/gym at Orangewood for school and community use, and make the District eligible to receive over $2,000,000 in state grants, by issuing $6,000,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures, at interest rates below legal limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8400, "fingerprint": "2004|200400262|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400262|KERN", "content_hash": "dffb2f1ec539f18f", "measure_id": "200400262", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a city-wide special tax of up to $75.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of three (3) fiscal years beginning July 1, 2004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1128, "no_votes": 481, "total_votes": 1609, "percent_yes": 70.10565568676196, "percent_no": 29.894344313238037, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-06-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.759819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.616319", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a city-wide special tax of up to $75.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of three (3) fiscal years beginning July 1, 2004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8401, "fingerprint": "2004|200400273|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400273|KERN", "content_hash": "80d2ecb7f33303ff", "measure_id": "200400273", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Stallion Springs Community Services District (\"District\") ordinance no. 134 \"A\" be approved and become effective which provides for: (1) levying a special tax in the amount of $60 per parcel per year for necessary police expenses, effective the fiscal year when funding for police operations drops $50,000 or more and (2) only the extent such special tax becomes effective increasing the District's appropriations limits in accordance with article XIII B of the California Constitution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 568, "no_votes": 135, "total_votes": 703, "percent_yes": 80.79658605974396, "percent_no": 19.20341394025604, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-31", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.760105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.616503", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Stallion Springs Community Services District (\"District\") ordinance no. 134 \"A\" be approved and become effective which provides for: (1) levying a special tax in the amount of $60 per parcel per year for necessary police expenses, effective the fiscal year when funding for police operations drops $50,000 or more and (2) only the extent such special tax becomes effective increasing the District's appropriations limits in accordance with article XIII B of the California Constitution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8408, "fingerprint": "2004|200400623|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400623|KERN", "content_hash": "cf7a1e95c4cc309f", "measure_id": "200400623", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve student overcrowding by building and acquiring new high schools and classrooms, renovating and repairing every high school in the District, and becoming eligible for State matching funds, shall Kern High School District issue $219 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates provided spending is annually reviewed and audited by an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and no money is transferred to the State of California?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97540, "no_votes": 48739, "total_votes": 146279, "percent_yes": 66.68079491929805, "percent_no": 33.31920508070195, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.762213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.618212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve student overcrowding by building and acquiring new high schools and classrooms, renovating and repairing every high school in the District, and becoming eligible for State matching funds, shall Kern High School District issue $219 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates provided spending is annually reviewed and audited by an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and no money is transferred to the State of California?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8409, "fingerprint": "2004|200400624|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400624|KERN", "content_hash": "5b832bafc7e05145", "measure_id": "200400624", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education shall the Maricopa Unified School District repair and upgrade classrooms, pool, and gym, improve student access to computers and technology, upgrade electrical systems, fix plumbing systems and restrooms, make health and safety improvement, replace fire alarms and remove asbestos, repair roofs, upgrade heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems by issuing $6,000,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 342, "no_votes": 192, "total_votes": 534, "percent_yes": 64.04494382022472, "percent_no": 35.95505617977528, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.762502", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.618503", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education shall the Maricopa Unified School District repair and upgrade classrooms, pool, and gym, improve student access to computers and technology, upgrade electrical systems, fix plumbing systems and restrooms, make health and safety improvement, replace fire alarms and remove asbestos, repair roofs, upgrade heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems by issuing $6,000,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8402, "fingerprint": "2004|200400422|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400422|KERN", "content_hash": "ba2363309c823461", "measure_id": "200400422", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be enacted in the City of Delano a temporary sales tax rate increase of one-half of one percent (0.50%) which will end after ten (10) years, the proceeds of which shall be used for essential general fund services including, but not limited to street and road improvements, police and fire protection, parks and recreation and other City General Fund services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2712, "no_votes": 3127, "total_votes": 5839, "percent_yes": 46.44630929953759, "percent_no": 53.55369070046241, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.760392", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.616692", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be enacted in the City of Delano a temporary sales tax rate increase of one-half of one percent (0.50%) which will end after ten (10) years, the proceeds of which shall be used for essential general fund services including, but not limited to street and road improvements, police and fire protection, parks and recreation and other City General Fund services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8403, "fingerprint": "2004|200400423|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400423|KERN", "content_hash": "1e0904846c519660", "measure_id": "200400423", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Ridgecrest adopt ordinance no. 04-05 to provide for an additional three-quarter of one percent sales tax for general purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3805, "no_votes": 7000, "total_votes": 10805, "percent_yes": 35.21517815826006, "percent_no": 64.78482184173994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.760767", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.616877", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Ridgecrest adopt ordinance no. 04-05 to provide for an additional three-quarter of one percent sales tax for general purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8407, "fingerprint": "2004|200400622|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400622|KERN", "content_hash": "3044a23b5c9ac32f", "measure_id": "200400622", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To accommodate increasing enrollment at Antelope Valley College, prepare students for jobs, four-year colleges, improve campus safety by: Expanding facilities for nursing, medical training programs; Expanding health, science, English, math, language labs, classrooms; Upgrading high-tech learning center; and repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms, shall Antelope Valley Community College District issue $139 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3398, "no_votes": 1811, "total_votes": 5209, "percent_yes": 65.23325014398156, "percent_no": 34.766749856018436, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.761922", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.617739", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To accommodate increasing enrollment at Antelope Valley College, prepare students for jobs, four-year colleges, improve campus safety by: Expanding facilities for nursing, medical training programs; Expanding health, science, English, math, language labs, classrooms; Upgrading high-tech learning center; and repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms, shall Antelope Valley Community College District issue $139 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8404, "fingerprint": "2004|200400424|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400424|KERN", "content_hash": "ce131d1ef49d83b1", "measure_id": "200400424", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1202, "no_votes": 1244, "total_votes": 2446, "percent_yes": 49.14145543744889, "percent_no": 50.85854456255111, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.761058", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.617065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8405, "fingerprint": "2004|200400425|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400425|KERN", "content_hash": "bfa5ab31f5f56a29", "measure_id": "200400425", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Transient Occupancy Tax imposed on hotels, motels, and other lodging places and collected from the persons renting rooms be increased from 8% to 12%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1016, "no_votes": 1535, "total_votes": 2551, "percent_yes": 39.82751862014896, "percent_no": 60.17248137985104, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.761343", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.617251", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Transient Occupancy Tax imposed on hotels, motels, and other lodging places and collected from the persons renting rooms be increased from 8% to 12%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8406, "fingerprint": "2004|200400426|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400426|KERN", "content_hash": "479d7b7f3f80ce78", "measure_id": "200400426", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should dairy facilities be prohibited from locating within ten miles from the city limits of the City of Wasco?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2516, "no_votes": 578, "total_votes": 3094, "percent_yes": 81.31868131868131, "percent_no": 18.681318681318686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.761635", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.617431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should dairy facilities be prohibited from locating within ten miles from the city limits of the City of Wasco?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11787, "fingerprint": "2004|200400626|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400626|KINGS", "content_hash": "bc4c7921c87a292c", "measure_id": "200400626", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Traver Elementary School District: Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $700,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 12, "percent_yes": 83.33333333333334, "percent_no": 16.666666666666657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.722261", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.765340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.621058", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Traver Elementary School District: Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $700,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8410, "fingerprint": "2004|200400016|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400016|KINGS", "content_hash": "ed8e95b85ff09e7c", "measure_id": "200400016", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Kings County Board of Supervisors establish by ordinance the office of Kings County Director of Finance and consolidate therewith the offices of the County Auditor/Controller and County Treasure/Tax Collector?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11227, "no_votes": 5771, "total_votes": 16998, "percent_yes": 66.04894693493351, "percent_no": 33.95105306506649, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.762839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.618792", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Kings County Board of Supervisors establish by ordinance the office of Kings County Director of Finance and consolidate therewith the offices of the County Auditor/Controller and County Treasure/Tax Collector?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11786, "fingerprint": "2004|200400625|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400625|KINGS", "content_hash": "f5ac5b46c53243d8", "measure_id": "200400625", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Hanford High School Overcrowding Measure: To reduce overcrowding in local high schools, improve student safety and expand job training programs by constructing, acquiring and equipping a new high school, classrooms, technical and vocational training classrooms, sites, facilities, installing fire safety equipment and replacing outdated computers and technology, repairing schools, qualifying for State matching funds, shall Hanford Joint Union High School District issue $33,500,000 of bonds, at legal rates, require annual financial audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12505, "no_votes": 6150, "total_votes": 18655, "percent_yes": 67.03296703296702, "percent_no": 32.96703296703298, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.721840", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.765047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.620779", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Hanford High School Overcrowding Measure: To reduce overcrowding in local high schools, improve student safety and expand job training programs by constructing, acquiring and equipping a new high school, classrooms, technical and vocational training classrooms, sites, facilities, installing fire safety equipment and replacing outdated computers and technology, repairing schools, qualifying for State matching funds, shall Hanford Joint Union High School District issue $33,500,000 of bonds, at legal rates, require annual financial audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8414, "fingerprint": "2004|200400162|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400162|KINGS", "content_hash": "fc3cf3e645d86b63", "measure_id": "200400162", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable Lemoore Union School District to construct a new elementary school to reduce student overcrowding and preserve class-size reduction, build additional classrooms and support facilities, provide improved access to computers and modern technology; and to qualify for $3,600,000 in State funds for eligible projects, shall the District be authorized to issue $7,100,000 in bonds, at interest rates within the statutory limit, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher or administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1729, "no_votes": 1702, "total_votes": 3431, "percent_yes": 50.39347129116876, "percent_no": 49.60652870883124, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.764064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.619941", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable Lemoore Union School District to construct a new elementary school to reduce student overcrowding and preserve class-size reduction, build additional classrooms and support facilities, provide improved access to computers and modern technology; and to qualify for $3,600,000 in State funds for eligible projects, shall the District be authorized to issue $7,100,000 in bonds, at interest rates within the statutory limit, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher or administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8412, "fingerprint": "2004|200400160|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400160|KINGS", "content_hash": "ede6ce00dbcc65c7", "measure_id": "200400160", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "College of the Sequoias Job Training, Repair Measure: To prepare students for skilled jobs, four-year colleges, train nurses, police, firefighters, accommodate population growth by: Repairing, upgrading leaky roofs, aging classrooms, computer wiring, ventilation, plumbing, sewers; Improving fire safety, security; Remove hazardous materials; Acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, training/education centers in Hanford, Tulare, Visalia, shall Sequoias Community College District issue $95,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6828, "no_votes": 5363, "total_votes": 12191, "percent_yes": 56.0085308834386, "percent_no": 43.9914691165614, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.763484", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.619355", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "College of the Sequoias Job Training, Repair Measure: To prepare students for skilled jobs, four-year colleges, train nurses, police, firefighters, accommodate population growth by: Repairing, upgrading leaky roofs, aging classrooms, computer wiring, ventilation, plumbing, sewers; Improving fire safety, security; Remove hazardous materials; Acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, training/education centers in Hanford, Tulare, Visalia, shall Sequoias Community College District issue $95,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8415, "fingerprint": "2004|200400164|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400164|KINGS", "content_hash": "829e8964ad42b6c8", "measure_id": "200400164", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to meet the educational needs of Tulare's growing high school age population and support Tulare's economic growth, shall the Tulare Joint Union High School District build a new high school and other related facilities and modernize the Tulare Western High School Swim Complex, and shall the district issue $45 million of bonds at the lowest competitive interest rates within legal limits so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizen's advisory committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10, "no_votes": 4, "total_votes": 14, "percent_yes": 71.42857142857143, "percent_no": 28.57142857142857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.764751", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.620492", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to meet the educational needs of Tulare's growing high school age population and support Tulare's economic growth, shall the Tulare Joint Union High School District build a new high school and other related facilities and modernize the Tulare Western High School Swim Complex, and shall the district issue $45 million of bonds at the lowest competitive interest rates within legal limits so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizen's advisory committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8413, "fingerprint": "2004|200400161|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400161|KINGS", "content_hash": "1f68f08df29a2972", "measure_id": "200400161", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Kingsburg Joint Union Elementary School District acquire a site and construct a new elementary school, upgrade fire alarm systems, repair leaking roofs, upgrade electrical wiring for computers, install security locks, upgrade heating, ventilation and cooling systems, repair, construct and equip classrooms, restrooms, and other facilities; qualify for State matching funds by issuing $7,500,000 of bonds at legal rates with guaranteed annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for staff salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 98, "no_votes": 74, "total_votes": 172, "percent_yes": 56.97674418604651, "percent_no": 43.02325581395349, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.763775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.619641", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Kingsburg Joint Union Elementary School District acquire a site and construct a new elementary school, upgrade fire alarm systems, repair leaking roofs, upgrade electrical wiring for computers, install security locks, upgrade heating, ventilation and cooling systems, repair, construct and equip classrooms, restrooms, and other facilities; qualify for State matching funds by issuing $7,500,000 of bonds at legal rates with guaranteed annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for staff salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11785, "fingerprint": "2004|200400163|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400163|KINGS", "content_hash": "f9e2532d1d1d962b", "measure_id": "200400163", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Traver Joint Elementary School District: Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $700,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit.  Funds received from this bond will serve as a match for \"State of California Joint Use Funds\" for which the Traver JESD qualifies for.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 11, "percent_yes": 72.72727272727273, "percent_no": 27.272727272727266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.721286", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.764450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.620214", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Traver Joint Elementary School District: Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $700,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit.  Funds received from this bond will serve as a match for \"State of California Joint Use Funds\" for which the Traver JESD qualifies for.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8411, "fingerprint": "2004|200400159|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400159|KINGS", "content_hash": "46f23adf95b21c0f", "measure_id": "200400159", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve quality of education, shall Armona Union Elementary School District be authorized to repair/modernize/upgrade aging school facilities, portable classrooms, electrical, mechanical and plumbing systems, relieve over-crowding by constructing classrooms, core student support facilities and an additional school campus, install health/safety and handicapped accessibility improvements, and qualify for approximately $3,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $2,785,000 of bonds within legal interest rates with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and no bond funds spent on staff salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 534, "no_votes": 298, "total_votes": 832, "percent_yes": 64.1826923076923, "percent_no": 35.81730769230769, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.763132", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.619071", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve quality of education, shall Armona Union Elementary School District be authorized to repair/modernize/upgrade aging school facilities, portable classrooms, electrical, mechanical and plumbing systems, relieve over-crowding by constructing classrooms, core student support facilities and an additional school campus, install health/safety and handicapped accessibility improvements, and qualify for approximately $3,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $2,785,000 of bonds within legal interest rates with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and no bond funds spent on staff salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8416, "fingerprint": "2004|200400274|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400274|LAKE", "content_hash": "c5dca2fedb6196fa", "measure_id": "200400274", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special annual tax of $160 per year per single parcel be imposed on all the parcels within County Service Area No. 2 (Spring Valley Lakes) for a period of twelve (12) years commencing with fiscal year 2004-2005 for the purpose of improvements to existing paved roads, which shall be effective for the fiscal year 2004-2005?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92, "no_votes": 145, "total_votes": 237, "percent_yes": 38.81856540084388, "percent_no": 61.18143459915612, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-31", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.765630", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.621339", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special annual tax of $160 per year per single parcel be imposed on all the parcels within County Service Area No. 2 (Spring Valley Lakes) for a period of twelve (12) years commencing with fiscal year 2004-2005 for the purpose of improvements to existing paved roads, which shall be effective for the fiscal year 2004-2005?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8419, "fingerprint": "2004|200400627|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400627|LAKE", "content_hash": "6398933e97450f5d", "measure_id": "200400627", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Konocti Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, modernize, and improve classrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; increase student access to computers and modern technology; repair and replace roofs; fix restrooms; and make the District eligible to receive $3.4 million in State grants by issuing $18.5 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5173, "no_votes": 2046, "total_votes": 7219, "percent_yes": 71.65812439396039, "percent_no": 28.341875606039608, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.766486", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.622182", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Konocti Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, modernize, and improve classrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; increase student access to computers and modern technology; repair and replace roofs; fix restrooms; and make the District eligible to receive $3.4 million in State grants by issuing $18.5 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8417, "fingerprint": "2004|200400427|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400427|LAKE", "content_hash": "699e3aa5ed43b1de", "measure_id": "200400427", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Lakeport enact a one-half cent sales tax for City facilities, services and programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1270, "no_votes": 813, "total_votes": 2083, "percent_yes": 60.96975516082573, "percent_no": 39.03024483917427, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.765915", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.621626", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Lakeport enact a one-half cent sales tax for City facilities, services and programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8418, "fingerprint": "2004|200400428|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400428|LAKE", "content_hash": "28c5b65e0beeb033", "measure_id": "200400428", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"I\" is approved, should the proceeds fund repair and maintenance of City streets, park and community service facilities, and expand public services and programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1682, "no_votes": 341, "total_votes": 2023, "percent_yes": 83.14384577360356, "percent_no": 16.85615422639644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.766199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.621900", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"I\" is approved, should the proceeds fund repair and maintenance of City streets, park and community service facilities, and expand public services and programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8421, "fingerprint": "2004|200400165|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400165|LASSEN", "content_hash": "0c4ebc73f5608745", "measure_id": "200400165", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Lassen Union High School District repair aging facilities, upgrade, construct and equip sites and classrooms, relieve overcrowding, upgrade fire suppression, electrical, plumbing, cooling and heating systems, improve disabled access, remove hazardous asbestos, qualify for state matching funds, by issuing $5,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrators' salaries or other school operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2874, "no_votes": 2804, "total_votes": 5678, "percent_yes": 50.61641423036281, "percent_no": 49.38358576963719, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.767062", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.622748", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Lassen Union High School District repair aging facilities, upgrade, construct and equip sites and classrooms, relieve overcrowding, upgrade fire suppression, electrical, plumbing, cooling and heating systems, improve disabled access, remove hazardous asbestos, qualify for state matching funds, by issuing $5,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrators' salaries or other school operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8420, "fingerprint": "2004|200400073|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400073|LASSEN", "content_hash": "3de81c00c8c52e56", "measure_id": "200400073", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-0900 of the City of Susanville authorizing the City Council of the City of Susanville to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (a pass-through room tax charged to travelers) rate from 8 percent to 10 percent effective July 1, 2004, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1172, "no_votes": 944, "total_votes": 2116, "percent_yes": 55.3875236294896, "percent_no": 44.6124763705104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.766773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.622471", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-0900 of the City of Susanville authorizing the City Council of the City of Susanville to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (a pass-through room tax charged to travelers) rate from 8 percent to 10 percent effective July 1, 2004, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8422, "fingerprint": "2004|200400307|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400307|LASSEN", "content_hash": "d998dc2aa3c129e7", "measure_id": "200400307", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain existing fire service programs, improve the quality of said services, and to provide funds to modernize facilities related to said services, shall the Westwood Community Services District levy a parcel tax in the amount of $100 to be levied annually on all taxable parcels commencing July 1, 2005 and shall said tax be subject to any annual inflation adjustment not to exceed 5%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 510, "no_votes": 268, "total_votes": 778, "percent_yes": 65.55269922879178, "percent_no": 34.44730077120822, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.767410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.623060", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain existing fire service programs, improve the quality of said services, and to provide funds to modernize facilities related to said services, shall the Westwood Community Services District levy a parcel tax in the amount of $100 to be levied annually on all taxable parcels commencing July 1, 2005 and shall said tax be subject to any annual inflation adjustment not to exceed 5%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8424, "fingerprint": "2004|200400628|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400628|LASSEN", "content_hash": "78c47d0a435c85d1", "measure_id": "200400628", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize its schools and classrooms; including electrical, heating and plumbing systems; fix leaky roofs; and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Fall River Joint Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, construct and acquire school facilities and equipment and issue $4,400,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 173, "no_votes": 134, "total_votes": 307, "percent_yes": 56.35179153094463, "percent_no": 43.64820846905537, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.767987", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.623636", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize its schools and classrooms; including electrical, heating and plumbing systems; fix leaky roofs; and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Fall River Joint Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, construct and acquire school facilities and equipment and issue $4,400,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8423, "fingerprint": "2004|200400429|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400429|LASSEN", "content_hash": "a9f785b6a02227e7", "measure_id": "200400429", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-0909 of the City of Susanville, authorizing the City of Susanville to impose a special transaction and use tax in the total amount of .50 percent to be used solely for the construction costs of the proposed Sierra Sports Complex at 925 Sierra Road, Susanville, California, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1719, "no_votes": 1944, "total_votes": 3663, "percent_yes": 46.928746928746925, "percent_no": 53.071253071253075, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.767700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.623338", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-0909 of the City of Susanville, authorizing the City of Susanville to impose a special transaction and use tax in the total amount of .50 percent to be used solely for the construction costs of the proposed Sierra Sports Complex at 925 Sierra Road, Susanville, California, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8425, "fingerprint": "2004|200400629|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400629|LASSEN", "content_hash": "9454941a29731198", "measure_id": "200400629", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make essential improvements in existing school facilities, to acquire certain equipment, construct new facilities, and to qualify for state funding, shall the Susanville School District be authorized to issue $3,700,000 in bonds, bearing interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit, establish a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent only on these improvements and for no other purpose?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2461, "no_votes": 2044, "total_votes": 4505, "percent_yes": 54.62819089900111, "percent_no": 45.37180910099889, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.768275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.623858", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make essential improvements in existing school facilities, to acquire certain equipment, construct new facilities, and to qualify for state funding, shall the Susanville School District be authorized to issue $3,700,000 in bonds, bearing interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit, establish a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent only on these improvements and for no other purpose?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8448, "fingerprint": "2004|200400244|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400244|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c721e3fc53db16a5", "measure_id": "200400244", "measure_letter": "04-A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance regarding the proposed development of \"The Home Stretch at Hollywood Park,\" a retail commercial project adjacent to Hollywood Park Race Track, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4889, "no_votes": 7542, "total_votes": 12431, "percent_yes": 39.329096613305445, "percent_no": 60.670903386694555, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.775530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.628451", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance regarding the proposed development of \"The Home Stretch at Hollywood Park,\" a retail commercial project adjacent to Hollywood Park Race Track, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8449, "fingerprint": "2004|200400263|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400263|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "19191f2d9a03621d", "measure_id": "200400263", "measure_letter": "2000-01A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted August 28, 2003 by the local Agency Formation Commission, affecting the City of Palmdale, Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 40 and Los Angeles County Road District No. 5, ordering the annexation of the territory described in the order to the City of Palmdale, the detachment of said territory from Los Angeles County Road District No. 5, and annexation of the westerly portion of said territory to Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 40, be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6, "no_votes": 75, "total_votes": 81, "percent_yes": 7.4074074074074, "percent_no": 92.5925925925926, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-06-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.777715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.629995", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted August 28, 2003 by the local Agency Formation Commission, affecting the City of Palmdale, Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 40 and Los Angeles County Road District No. 5, ordering the annexation of the territory described in the order to the City of Palmdale, the detachment of said territory from Los Angeles County Road District No. 5, and annexation of the westerly portion of said territory to Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 40, be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11799, "fingerprint": "2004|200400308|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400308|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b544c57df6538670", "measure_id": "200400308", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To provide expanded law enforcement in Los Angeles County and each of its cities, additional deputy sheriffs and city police officers, expanded community policing, strengthened youth and adult crime prevention programs, improved emergency and terrorism response capability, upgraded emergency communications systems, strengthened Sheriff's operations in the jails, and related justice services, shall the Countywide sales tax be increased by one-half cent, subject to audit and Oversight Committee review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1652046, "no_votes": 1093409, "total_votes": 2745455, "percent_yes": 60.17385096459421, "percent_no": 39.82614903540579, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.739555", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.779131", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.630956", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide expanded law enforcement in Los Angeles County and each of its cities, additional deputy sheriffs and city police officers, expanded community policing, strengthened youth and adult crime prevention programs, improved emergency and terrorism response capability, upgraded emergency communications systems, strengthened Sheriff's operations in the jails, and related justice services, shall the Countywide sales tax be increased by one-half cent, subject to audit and Oversight Committee review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11796, "fingerprint": "2004|200400281|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400281|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "153c07763bcb0d10", "measure_id": "200400281", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 5387 rezoning the Town Center area for mixed uses, including entertainment, public park, restaurants, housing, shopping, and parking be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15798, "no_votes": 14716, "total_votes": 30514, "percent_yes": 51.77295667562431, "percent_no": 48.22704332437569, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-09-14", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.738246", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.778325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.630384", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 5387 rezoning the Town Center area for mixed uses, including entertainment, public park, restaurants, housing, shopping, and parking be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11795, "fingerprint": "2004|200400267|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400267|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c468f54806be0cde", "measure_id": "200400267", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Because the California Legislature has seized millions of dollars belonging to local government causing serious deficits, shall the City of Montebello adopt an ordinance assessing utility usage at 6.5% with funds used for vital services, avoiding layoffs of police, firefighters, paramedics and other personnel leading to reduced service levels, preventing delays in emergency response times, and adding resources to fight gangs/graffiti; also establishing an Oversight Committee insuring these revenues are used for essential city services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1591, "no_votes": 4182, "total_votes": 5773, "percent_yes": 27.55932790576823, "percent_no": 72.44067209423177, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-07-27", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.737820", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.777986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.630189", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Because the California Legislature has seized millions of dollars belonging to local government causing serious deficits, shall the City of Montebello adopt an ordinance assessing utility usage at 6.5% with funds used for vital services, avoiding layoffs of police, firefighters, paramedics and other personnel leading to reduced service levels, preventing delays in emergency response times, and adding resources to fight gangs/graffiti; also establishing an Oversight Committee insuring these revenues are used for essential city services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11793, "fingerprint": "2004|200400259|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400259|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4369abaf9b586f30", "measure_id": "200400259", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance approving a zone change and the Monrovia Nursery Specific Plan (a Master plan for future use of the 518-acre Monrovia Nursery site) which prohibits hillside development, approves a range of housing units, requires the landowner to build a new K-8 elementary/middle school, public parks and trails as well as provide land for a transit center and a new fire station, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2892, "no_votes": 933, "total_votes": 3825, "percent_yes": 75.6078431372549, "percent_no": 24.392156862745097, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-05-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.736722", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.777166", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.629611", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance approving a zone change and the Monrovia Nursery Specific Plan (a Master plan for future use of the 518-acre Monrovia Nursery site) which prohibits hillside development, approves a range of housing units, requires the landowner to build a new K-8 elementary/middle school, public parks and trails as well as provide land for a transit center and a new fire station, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11791, "fingerprint": "2004|200400249|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400249|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ea0db49363461058", "measure_id": "200400249", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Lancaster levy a special tax of $25 on each parcel of real property in the City for the sole purpose of funding ten (10) additional Sheriff's Deputies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3814, "no_votes": 4248, "total_votes": 8062, "percent_yes": 47.30836020838501, "percent_no": 52.69163979161499, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.736045", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.776625", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.629226", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Lancaster levy a special tax of $25 on each parcel of real property in the City for the sole purpose of funding ten (10) additional Sheriff's Deputies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11788, "fingerprint": "2004|200400246|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400246|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5be83e85080dab1a", "measure_id": "200400246", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the transient occupancy tax rate imposed on persons occupying a Hotel, Inn, Tourist Home or House for less than 30 days be increased from 9% to 12%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 516, "no_votes": 404, "total_votes": 920, "percent_yes": 56.086956521739125, "percent_no": 43.913043478260875, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.735210", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.775802", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.628645", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the transient occupancy tax rate imposed on persons occupying a Hotel, Inn, Tourist Home or House for less than 30 days be increased from 9% to 12%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8446, "fingerprint": "2004|200400174|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400174|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3ea2011402a6fead", "measure_id": "200400174", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs and four-year colleges and train nurses, police and fire fighters by: repairing aging buildings, classrooms, laboratories; expanding nursing, police, and firefighter training centers; removing asbestos; upgrading earthquake/fire safety and campus security; repairing leaky roofs, plumbing, air conditioning; upgrading wiring for computer technology, shall Rio Hondo Community College District issue $245 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27447, "no_votes": 16195, "total_votes": 43642, "percent_yes": 62.89125154667522, "percent_no": 37.10874845332478, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.774672", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.628059", "update_count": 8, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs and four-year colleges and train nurses, police and fire fighters by: repairing aging buildings, classrooms, laboratories; expanding nursing, police, and firefighter training centers; removing asbestos; upgrading earthquake/fire safety and campus security; repairing leaky roofs, plumbing, air conditioning; upgrading wiring for computer technology, shall Rio Hondo Community College District issue $245 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11797, "fingerprint": "2004|200400282|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400282|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4609b59dbeb5775b", "measure_id": "200400282", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 5389 enacting the Town Center Specific Plan to provide for mixed uses, including entertainment, public park, restaurants, housing, shopping, and parking be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15625, "no_votes": 14824, "total_votes": 30449, "percent_yes": 51.315314131827, "percent_no": 48.684685868173, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-09-14", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.738665", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.778595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.630574", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 5389 enacting the Town Center Specific Plan to provide for mixed uses, including entertainment, public park, restaurants, housing, shopping, and parking be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11794, "fingerprint": "2004|200400260|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400260|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d809f9822189e170", "measure_id": "200400260", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance adopting a development agreement between the City of Azusa and Monrovia Nursery, which requires the landowner to pay development fees, permit fees, traffic improvement fees and related taxes be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2877, "no_votes": 921, "total_votes": 3798, "percent_yes": 75.75039494470775, "percent_no": 24.24960505529225, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-05-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.737101", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.777438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.629802", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance adopting a development agreement between the City of Azusa and Monrovia Nursery, which requires the landowner to pay development fees, permit fees, traffic improvement fees and related taxes be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11789, "fingerprint": "2004|200400247|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400247|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2422e17e52c99aaa", "measure_id": "200400247", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 378 be repealed so that the business license taxes collected by the City are redirected from the Catalina Island Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau to the City of Avalon's General Fund for general City Services and other purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 643, "no_votes": 269, "total_votes": 912, "percent_yes": 70.50438596491229, "percent_no": 29.495614035087712, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.735471", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.776085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.628836", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 378 be repealed so that the business license taxes collected by the City are redirected from the Catalina Island Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau to the City of Avalon's General Fund for general City Services and other purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8442, "fingerprint": "2004|200400170|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400170|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "eeacb43661191958", "measure_id": "200400170", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the La Canada Unified School District upgrade fire alarm systems, install security locks, improve outdoor security lighting, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, restrooms, facilities, libraries and computer labs; qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $25,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to ensure no money is used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4408, "no_votes": 2531, "total_votes": 6939, "percent_yes": 63.52500360282461, "percent_no": 36.47499639717539, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.773410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.627292", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the La Canada Unified School District upgrade fire alarm systems, install security locks, improve outdoor security lighting, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, restrooms, facilities, libraries and computer labs; qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $25,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to ensure no money is used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11808, "fingerprint": "2004|200400630|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400630|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4e74153ee70c997a", "measure_id": "200400630", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Alhambra Unified School District repair, upgrade and equip all local schools, improve student safety conditions, upgrade electrical wiring for technology, install fire safety, energy efficient heating/cooling systems, emergency lighting, fire doors, replace outdated plumbing/sewer systems, repair leaky rundown roofs/bathrooms, decaying walls, drainage systems, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, libraries, science labs, sites and facilities, by issuing $85,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26048, "no_votes": 10814, "total_votes": 36862, "percent_yes": 70.66355596549292, "percent_no": 29.336444034507082, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.741996", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.781667", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.632688", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Alhambra Unified School District repair, upgrade and equip all local schools, improve student safety conditions, upgrade electrical wiring for technology, install fire safety, energy efficient heating/cooling systems, emergency lighting, fire doors, replace outdated plumbing/sewer systems, repair leaky rundown roofs/bathrooms, decaying walls, drainage systems, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, libraries, science labs, sites and facilities, by issuing $85,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11798, "fingerprint": "2004|200400283|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400283|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fe96f96f3b435b11", "measure_id": "200400283", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 5390 approving a development agreement between the City and Caruso Affiliated Holdings for the Town Center area to confirm zoning for development of mixed uses, including entertainment, public park, restaurants, housing, shopping, and parking be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15506, "no_votes": 14961, "total_votes": 30467, "percent_yes": 50.89441034561985, "percent_no": 49.10558965438015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-09-14", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.739123", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.778863", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.630763", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 5390 approving a development agreement between the City and Caruso Affiliated Holdings for the Town Center area to confirm zoning for development of mixed uses, including entertainment, public park, restaurants, housing, shopping, and parking be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8439, "fingerprint": "2004|200400167|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400167|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f7cf12f977375c15", "measure_id": "200400167", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, upgrade and equip all public San Dimas and La Verne schools, by repairing/replacing inadequate/unsafe fire safety, security, heating ventilation and air conditioning systems, leaking roofs, windows, restrooms, plumbing systems, science labs, libraries, upgrading wiring for computer technology needs, constructing and acquiring classrooms/school facilities and to qualify for State bond funds, shall Bonita Unified School District issue $56,360,000 of bonds, oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8841, "no_votes": 5402, "total_votes": 14243, "percent_yes": 62.07259706522502, "percent_no": 37.92740293477498, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.772414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.626709", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, upgrade and equip all public San Dimas and La Verne schools, by repairing/replacing inadequate/unsafe fire safety, security, heating ventilation and air conditioning systems, leaking roofs, windows, restrooms, plumbing systems, science labs, libraries, upgrading wiring for computer technology needs, constructing and acquiring classrooms/school facilities and to qualify for State bond funds, shall Bonita Unified School District issue $56,360,000 of bonds, oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8440, "fingerprint": "2004|200400168|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400168|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "69ed113c7db1eee2", "measure_id": "200400168", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare local Cerritos College Students for 4-year universities and high-skilled jobs, qualify for State matching funds by repairing deteriorating roofs, wiring, plumbing, inefficient heating/cooling systems; renovating aging classrooms, science/computer labs; repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping college buildings, sites; improving parking/campus safety; upgrading job training/technology facilities, shall Cerritos Community College District issue $210,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates with Strict Accountability Safeguards, including Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, no money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29336, "no_votes": 21500, "total_votes": 50836, "percent_yes": 57.70713667479739, "percent_no": 42.29286332520261, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.772703", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.626903", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare local Cerritos College Students for 4-year universities and high-skilled jobs, qualify for State matching funds by repairing deteriorating roofs, wiring, plumbing, inefficient heating/cooling systems; renovating aging classrooms, science/computer labs; repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping college buildings, sites; improving parking/campus safety; upgrading job training/technology facilities, shall Cerritos Community College District issue $210,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates with Strict Accountability Safeguards, including Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, no money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11800, "fingerprint": "2004|200400430|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400430|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6581b3c08d8f3820", "measure_id": "200400430", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Alhambra City Charter be amended to update the election provisions related to the Alhambra Unified School District, all of which amendments are shown in the ballot pamphlet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23738, "no_votes": 7656, "total_votes": 31394, "percent_yes": 75.61317449194114, "percent_no": 24.386825508058863, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.739835", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.779404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.631147", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Alhambra City Charter be amended to update the election provisions related to the Alhambra Unified School District, all of which amendments are shown in the ballot pamphlet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8430, "fingerprint": "2004|200400078|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400078|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c7e6a12fc67b6cb7", "measure_id": "200400078", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) We the qualified electorate of the City of Compton support the reestablishment of the Compton Police Department.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2212, "no_votes": 4658, "total_votes": 6870, "percent_yes": 32.19796215429403, "percent_no": 67.80203784570597, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.769771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.624950", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) We the qualified electorate of the City of Compton support the reestablishment of the Compton Police Department.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11810, "fingerprint": "2004|200400632|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400632|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4c30a2bdfdacf2a2", "measure_id": "200400632", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety, repair and upgrade every neighborhood school in the Bassett Unified School District by: fixing leaky roofs; upgrading outdated plumbing/sewer systems, installing fire safety equipment, upgrading heating/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for technology; acquire school facilities the District is currently leasing; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries and facilities, shall the Bassett Unified School District issue $23,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4852, "no_votes": 1143, "total_votes": 5995, "percent_yes": 80.93411175979983, "percent_no": 19.065888240200167, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.742519", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.782263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.633071", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety, repair and upgrade every neighborhood school in the Bassett Unified School District by: fixing leaky roofs; upgrading outdated plumbing/sewer systems, installing fire safety equipment, upgrading heating/ventilation systems and electrical wiring for technology; acquire school facilities the District is currently leasing; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries and facilities, shall the Bassett Unified School District issue $23,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8444, "fingerprint": "2004|200400172|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400172|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5a9f197062c45acc", "measure_id": "200400172", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To avoid deeper cuts to neighborhood schools caused by California's fiscal crisis, which will compromise essential programs including reading, math, science, music, and art; to retain quality teachers, avoid even larger classes, and maintain up-to-date textbooks and instructional materials, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District assess $98 per parcel annually for four years, with exemption available for seniors, and independent oversight committee, no money for administrative salaries, and every dollar staying in our community to preserve quality education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12535, "no_votes": 5033, "total_votes": 17568, "percent_yes": 71.35132058287796, "percent_no": 28.64867941712204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.773986", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.627679", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid deeper cuts to neighborhood schools caused by California's fiscal crisis, which will compromise essential programs including reading, math, science, music, and art; to retain quality teachers, avoid even larger classes, and maintain up-to-date textbooks and instructional materials, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District assess $98 per parcel annually for four years, with exemption available for seniors, and independent oversight committee, no money for administrative salaries, and every dollar staying in our community to preserve quality education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8426, "fingerprint": "2004|200400074|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400074|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4108143593c5be45", "measure_id": "200400074", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Avalon, shall all property owners in the City of Avalon pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 396, "no_votes": 277, "total_votes": 673, "percent_yes": 58.84101040118871, "percent_no": 41.15898959881129, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.768622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.624061", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Avalon, shall all property owners in the City of Avalon pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11802, "fingerprint": "2004|200400432|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400432|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e8f4a9201ba59a4f", "measure_id": "200400432", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1643, establishing a redevelopment agency to function in the City of Gardena and declaring the necessity, therefore, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6184, "no_votes": 9748, "total_votes": 15932, "percent_yes": 38.81496359527994, "percent_no": 61.18503640472006, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.740393", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.779953", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.631531", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1643, establishing a redevelopment agency to function in the City of Gardena and declaring the necessity, therefore, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8441, "fingerprint": "2004|200400169|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400169|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "965396cecabfc3f3", "measure_id": "200400169", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare local students for four-year colleges, train local residents for high-skilled jobs by: upgrading campus safety and security; Expanding academic facilities, vocational technology, emergency medical training, nursing/dental classrooms, computer labs; Repairing leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing, sewer systems; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, science labs, sites, shall Citrus Community College District issue $121,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21639, "no_votes": 15779, "total_votes": 37418, "percent_yes": 57.83045593030093, "percent_no": 42.16954406969907, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.772991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.627099", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare local students for four-year colleges, train local residents for high-skilled jobs by: upgrading campus safety and security; Expanding academic facilities, vocational technology, emergency medical training, nursing/dental classrooms, computer labs; Repairing leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing, sewer systems; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, science labs, sites, shall Citrus Community College District issue $121,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11812, "fingerprint": "2004|200400635|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400635|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "81d0566aad4f1f59", "measure_id": "200400635", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce severe overcrowding in neighborhood schools, improve safety and learning, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Hawthorne School District construct new classrooms, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; reconfigure, acquire and construct school sites and facilities; and improve emergency/safety/security systems, technology, electrical capacity, building interiors, exteriors, grounds and equipment, by issuing $24,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds benefiting our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11314, "no_votes": 3017, "total_votes": 14331, "percent_yes": 78.94773567790105, "percent_no": 21.05226432209895, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.743337", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.783177", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.633699", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce severe overcrowding in neighborhood schools, improve safety and learning, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Hawthorne School District construct new classrooms, replace aging portables with permanent classrooms; reconfigure, acquire and construct school sites and facilities; and improve emergency/safety/security systems, technology, electrical capacity, building interiors, exteriors, grounds and equipment, by issuing $24,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators, and all funds benefiting our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8427, "fingerprint": "2004|200400075|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400075|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a120f9b40788584c", "measure_id": "200400075", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Bell, shall all property owners in the City of Bell pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 952, "no_votes": 767, "total_votes": 1719, "percent_yes": 55.38103548574753, "percent_no": 44.61896451425247, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.768912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.624268", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Bell, shall all property owners in the City of Bell pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11815, "fingerprint": "2004|200400638|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400638|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fa62116fb82da371", "measure_id": "200400638", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety, repair and upgrade every neighborhood school, shall the south Whittier Elementary School District upgrade fire alarm systems, install security locks, improve outdoor security lighting, upgrade classrooms to meet current standards, upgrade electrical wiring for technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, libraries, sites and facilities, by issuing $7,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4577, "no_votes": 1333, "total_votes": 5910, "percent_yes": 77.44500846023689, "percent_no": 22.554991539763108, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.744297", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.784071", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.634513", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety, repair and upgrade every neighborhood school, shall the south Whittier Elementary School District upgrade fire alarm systems, install security locks, improve outdoor security lighting, upgrade classrooms to meet current standards, upgrade electrical wiring for technology, repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, libraries, sites and facilities, by issuing $7,500,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8428, "fingerprint": "2004|200400076|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400076|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "835d220229fc93b7", "measure_id": "200400076", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Bradbury, shall all property owners in the City of Bradbury pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68, "no_votes": 128, "total_votes": 196, "percent_yes": 34.69387755102041, "percent_no": 65.3061224489796, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.769200", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.624465", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Bradbury, shall all property owners in the City of Bradbury pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11811, "fingerprint": "2004|200400633|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400633|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9d577d1705eb1566", "measure_id": "200400633", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety, repair and upgrade every neighborhood elementary school, shall El Monte City School District upgrade classrooms to meet current teaching and safety standards, electrical wiring for technology and security systems, install energy efficient classroom heating, cooling and ventilation systems, repair, construct, acquire, equip permanent classrooms, restrooms, sites and facilities, by issuing $50 million in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11855, "no_votes": 3721, "total_votes": 15576, "percent_yes": 76.11068310220853, "percent_no": 23.889316897791474, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.742794", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.782572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.633262", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety, repair and upgrade every neighborhood elementary school, shall El Monte City School District upgrade classrooms to meet current teaching and safety standards, electrical wiring for technology and security systems, install energy efficient classroom heating, cooling and ventilation systems, repair, construct, acquire, equip permanent classrooms, restrooms, sites and facilities, by issuing $50 million in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8429, "fingerprint": "2004|200400077|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400077|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "115d4fb8ebc0275e", "measure_id": "200400077", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Carson, shall all property owners in the City of Carson pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7240, "no_votes": 6704, "total_votes": 13944, "percent_yes": 51.92197360872059, "percent_no": 48.07802639127941, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.769485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.624662", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Carson, shall all property owners in the City of Carson pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11803, "fingerprint": "2004|200400433|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400433|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a4378a63745d495f", "measure_id": "200400433", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to make it unlawful to sell, use or discharge fireworks of any kind within the City of Hawthorne?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7310, "no_votes": 11247, "total_votes": 18557, "percent_yes": 39.392143126582965, "percent_no": 60.607856873417035, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.740674", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.780227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.631729", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to make it unlawful to sell, use or discharge fireworks of any kind within the City of Hawthorne?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8447, "fingerprint": "2004|200400175|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400175|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a316daea8e063be1", "measure_id": "200400175", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve your neighborhood elementary, middle/high schools: Ensuring qualified, credentialed teachers in every classroom; Replacing outdated textbooks/reading materials; Preventing class size increases; Preventing cuts to music/restoring elementary science enrichment programs; shall Walnut Valley Unified School District levy an annual parcel tax of $148 for 6 years only, with an exemption for seniors, guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6462, "no_votes": 3704, "total_votes": 10166, "percent_yes": 63.56482392288019, "percent_no": 36.43517607711981, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.775192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.628254", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve your neighborhood elementary, middle/high schools: Ensuring qualified, credentialed teachers in every classroom; Replacing outdated textbooks/reading materials; Preventing class size increases; Preventing cuts to music/restoring elementary science enrichment programs; shall Walnut Valley Unified School District levy an annual parcel tax of $148 for 6 years only, with an exemption for seniors, guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11804, "fingerprint": "2004|200400434|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400434|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ec0201da063f7616", "measure_id": "200400434", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 750-NS be adopted to adopt the Community Safety Enhancement Measure which would repeal the City's street lighting and landscaping assessment and impose in its place an annual charge upon property in the City to fund maintenance and improvement of street landscaping, streetlights and parks and operation of street lights, subject to accountability requirements set forth in that Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5391, "no_votes": 2400, "total_votes": 7791, "percent_yes": 69.19522525991528, "percent_no": 30.804774740084724, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.740944", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.780500", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.631920", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 750-NS be adopted to adopt the Community Safety Enhancement Measure which would repeal the City's street lighting and landscaping assessment and impose in its place an annual charge upon property in the City to fund maintenance and improvement of street landscaping, streetlights and parks and operation of street lights, subject to accountability requirements set forth in that Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11792, "fingerprint": "2004|200400250|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400250|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "347a4f7662446928", "measure_id": "200400250", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Walnut, shall all property owners in the city of Walnut pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1393, "no_votes": 2167, "total_votes": 3560, "percent_yes": 39.12921348314607, "percent_no": 60.87078651685393, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.736413", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.776898", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.629420", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Walnut, shall all property owners in the city of Walnut pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8435, "fingerprint": "2004|200400083|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400083|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0a90dfc0c3b9560c", "measure_id": "200400083", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the City of Pico Rivera approve an annual Special Parcel Tax of $98 on each single family residential parcel of land within the City, or as set forth in the authorizing resolution of the City for other types of property, adjusted annually using the County-CPI-U, for acquisition, construction, furnishing, maintenance and operation of library facilities, expected to be operated by Los Angeles County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2191, "no_votes": 4652, "total_votes": 6843, "percent_yes": 32.01812070729212, "percent_no": 67.98187929270787, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.771199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.625930", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the City of Pico Rivera approve an annual Special Parcel Tax of $98 on each single family residential parcel of land within the City, or as set forth in the authorizing resolution of the City for other types of property, adjusted annually using the County-CPI-U, for acquisition, construction, furnishing, maintenance and operation of library facilities, expected to be operated by Los Angeles County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11813, "fingerprint": "2004|200400636|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400636|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "df701ef62fbba8b3", "measure_id": "200400636", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make the District eligible for $73,000,000 of State matching funds, and to raise funds for projects including security, communications, heating/cooling systems, science labs, libraries and cafeterias, needed to improve student instruction and safety, shall the Montebello Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $98,000,000 in bonds subject to accountability measures, with interest rates at or below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25476, "no_votes": 9492, "total_votes": 34968, "percent_yes": 72.85518188057652, "percent_no": 27.144818119423476, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.743610", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.783521", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.633990", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make the District eligible for $73,000,000 of State matching funds, and to raise funds for projects including security, communications, heating/cooling systems, science labs, libraries and cafeterias, needed to improve student instruction and safety, shall the Montebello Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $98,000,000 in bonds subject to accountability measures, with interest rates at or below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8431, "fingerprint": "2004|200400079|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400079|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "571a3d7b77f0ffba", "measure_id": "200400079", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Gardena, shall all property owners in the City of Gardena pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3674, "no_votes": 3270, "total_votes": 6944, "percent_yes": 52.9089861751152, "percent_no": 47.0910138248848, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.770053", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.625149", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Gardena, shall all property owners in the City of Gardena pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11806, "fingerprint": "2004|200400436|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400436|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "391033469c713261", "measure_id": "200400436", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) applied to hotel bills and paid by hotel guests only, be increased from 12 percent to 14 percent to bring it on line with TOT rates of neighboring communities and to generate an estimated additional $3.5 million annually to the City's General Fund for general city purposes including police, fire, libraries, parks and recreation, environmental protection, after school programs and community-use payments to the school district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29206, "no_votes": 9897, "total_votes": 39103, "percent_yes": 74.6899214893998, "percent_no": 25.310078510600206, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.741475", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.781064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.632302", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) applied to hotel bills and paid by hotel guests only, be increased from 12 percent to 14 percent to bring it on line with TOT rates of neighboring communities and to generate an estimated additional $3.5 million annually to the City's General Fund for general city purposes including police, fire, libraries, parks and recreation, environmental protection, after school programs and community-use payments to the school district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8432, "fingerprint": "2004|200400080|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400080|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b17c660d03d9db95", "measure_id": "200400080", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Huntington Park, shall all property owners in the City of Huntington Park pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1626, "no_votes": 1018, "total_votes": 2644, "percent_yes": 61.49773071104387, "percent_no": 38.50226928895613, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.770339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.625345", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of Huntington Park, shall all property owners in the City of Huntington Park pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11805, "fingerprint": "2004|200400435|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400435|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bb2ba39e37e56378", "measure_id": "200400435", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To protect public health by cleaning up polluted storm water; keeping pollution, trash, toxic chemicals, dangerous bacteria from rivers, beaches; preserving clean drinking water by protecting groundwater quality; reducing flooding; increasing water conservation; protecting bays, rivers, lakes from storm water contamination; shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness totaling $500,000,000 for storm water projects, with independent financial audits, citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 764536, "no_votes": 237505, "total_votes": 1002041, "percent_yes": 76.29787603501254, "percent_no": 23.702123964987464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.741215", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.780770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.632111", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect public health by cleaning up polluted storm water; keeping pollution, trash, toxic chemicals, dangerous bacteria from rivers, beaches; preserving clean drinking water by protecting groundwater quality; reducing flooding; increasing water conservation; protecting bays, rivers, lakes from storm water contamination; shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness totaling $500,000,000 for storm water projects, with independent financial audits, citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8433, "fingerprint": "2004|200400081|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400081|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d2acd5dca257c228", "measure_id": "200400081", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of La Puente, shall all property owners in the City of La Puente pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1479, "no_votes": 1303, "total_votes": 2782, "percent_yes": 53.16319194823868, "percent_no": 46.83680805176132, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.770627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.625541", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of La Puente, shall all property owners in the City of La Puente pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11801, "fingerprint": "2004|200400431|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400431|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c9751e258f9f19d9", "measure_id": "200400431", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent reduction in general City services, such as parks, police, fire, and public works, shall the existing utility user tax established by the City in 1991, be affirmed with the exception that the residential utility user tax shall remain at 4% and the commercial utility user tax shall be set at 8% provided that eligible seniors who are sixty-two years and older remain exempt from the tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2066, "no_votes": 622, "total_votes": 2688, "percent_yes": 76.86011904761905, "percent_no": 23.13988095238095, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.740118", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.779679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.631337", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent reduction in general City services, such as parks, police, fire, and public works, shall the existing utility user tax established by the City in 1991, be affirmed with the exception that the residential utility user tax shall remain at 4% and the commercial utility user tax shall be set at 8% provided that eligible seniors who are sixty-two years and older remain exempt from the tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8443, "fingerprint": "2004|200400171|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400171|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7ecbbbc10df426bc", "measure_id": "200400171", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the quality of our local schools, shall La Canada Unified School District collect $400/year per taxable parcel for three (3) years, with an exemption for seniors, to restore programs lost due to state budget cuts, maintain smaller class sizes for all students, avoid loss of funding for teachers and support staff, maintain a strong instructional program for routine maintenance of schools, and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be revised by such support?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4401, "no_votes": 2553, "total_votes": 6954, "percent_yes": 63.28731665228645, "percent_no": 36.71268334771355, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.773700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.627486", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of our local schools, shall La Canada Unified School District collect $400/year per taxable parcel for three (3) years, with an exemption for seniors, to restore programs lost due to state budget cuts, maintain smaller class sizes for all students, avoid loss of funding for teachers and support staff, maintain a strong instructional program for routine maintenance of schools, and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be revised by such support?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8450, "fingerprint": "2004|200400634|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400634|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5f3f34e907233016", "measure_id": "200400634", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make essential major repairs and safety improvements to classrooms, some of which are over 75 years old, including electrical, waterlines, gas lines, rotting foundations, termite repair, replace portables older than 25 years, add cafeterias, computer labs, gymnasiums throughout the district, shall Garvey Elementary School District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by the Citizens Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6602, "no_votes": 2424, "total_votes": 9026, "percent_yes": 73.14424994460448, "percent_no": 26.855750055395518, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.782843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.633453", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make essential major repairs and safety improvements to classrooms, some of which are over 75 years old, including electrical, waterlines, gas lines, rotting foundations, termite repair, replace portables older than 25 years, add cafeterias, computer labs, gymnasiums throughout the district, shall Garvey Elementary School District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by the Citizens Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11809, "fingerprint": "2004|200400631|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400631|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3044a23b5c9ac32f", "measure_id": "200400631", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To accommodate increasing enrollment at Antelope Valley College, prepare students for jobs, four-year colleges, improve campus safety by: Expanding facilities for nursing, medical training programs; Expanding health, science, English, math, language labs, classrooms; Upgrading high-tech learning center; and repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms, shall Antelope Valley Community College District issue $139 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71568, "no_votes": 30802, "total_votes": 102370, "percent_yes": 69.9111067695614, "percent_no": 30.0888932304386, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.742257", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.781961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.632879", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To accommodate increasing enrollment at Antelope Valley College, prepare students for jobs, four-year colleges, improve campus safety by: Expanding facilities for nursing, medical training programs; Expanding health, science, English, math, language labs, classrooms; Upgrading high-tech learning center; and repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms, shall Antelope Valley Community College District issue $139 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8445, "fingerprint": "2004|200400173|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400173|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dbafecb9508a7e63", "measure_id": "200400173", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Should the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) be authorized to issue up to $3.87 Billion ($3,870,000,000) in general obligation bonds for new construction, acquisition, rehabilitation and upgrading of school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 335230, "no_votes": 191028, "total_votes": 526258, "percent_yes": 63.70069433623812, "percent_no": 36.29930566376188, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.774331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.627869", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) be authorized to issue up to $3.87 Billion ($3,870,000,000) in general obligation bonds for new construction, acquisition, rehabilitation and upgrading of school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11814, "fingerprint": "2004|200400637|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400637|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0be121fc6c486d7d", "measure_id": "200400637", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Santa Monica Community College District increase educational opportunities and raise student achievement; replace or repair deteriorating buildings; construct and equip laboratories, childcare centers and learning resources; meet new needs in emerging technologies; achieve energy savings; improve or acquire real property for fields and instructional use; improve access and availability; reduce costs through potential partnerships; and complete earthquake repairs by issuing, at interest rates within legal limits, $135 million in bonds with citizens' oversight, annual performance and financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27472, "no_votes": 19556, "total_votes": 47028, "percent_yes": 58.41626265203709, "percent_no": 41.58373734796291, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.743895", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.783796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.634247", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Santa Monica Community College District increase educational opportunities and raise student achievement; replace or repair deteriorating buildings; construct and equip laboratories, childcare centers and learning resources; meet new needs in emerging technologies; achieve energy savings; improve or acquire real property for fields and instructional use; improve access and availability; reduce costs through potential partnerships; and complete earthquake repairs by issuing, at interest rates within legal limits, $135 million in bonds with citizens' oversight, annual performance and financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8438, "fingerprint": "2004|200400166|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400166|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7ab89509ad3656d1", "measure_id": "200400166", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To design and construct permanent classrooms, science labs, restrooms, a library, a gymnasium, replace temporary classrooms, install technology, and provide core facilities at Vasquez High School and qualify for $6,100,000 in State grants, shall the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District issue $13,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and perform audits to guarantee bond money is spent exclusively upon the construction and upgrade of permanent classrooms and school buildings at Vasquez High School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1935, "no_votes": 1878, "total_votes": 3813, "percent_yes": 50.74744295830055, "percent_no": 49.25255704169945, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.772128", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.626510", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To design and construct permanent classrooms, science labs, restrooms, a library, a gymnasium, replace temporary classrooms, install technology, and provide core facilities at Vasquez High School and qualify for $6,100,000 in State grants, shall the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District issue $13,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and perform audits to guarantee bond money is spent exclusively upon the construction and upgrade of permanent classrooms and school buildings at Vasquez High School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11807, "fingerprint": "2004|200400437|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400437|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0ad155d08b6881c4", "measure_id": "200400437", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should section 510 of the Charter of the City of Torrance be amended to change the date of holding the general municipal election to the same day as the statewide direct primary election in each even-numbered year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35830, "no_votes": 17589, "total_votes": 53419, "percent_yes": 67.07351316947154, "percent_no": 32.92648683052846, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.741735", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.781368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.632496", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should section 510 of the Charter of the City of Torrance be amended to change the date of holding the general municipal election to the same day as the statewide direct primary election in each even-numbered year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8436, "fingerprint": "2004|200400084|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400084|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f6b531beb99fc272", "measure_id": "200400084", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of San Fernando, shall all property owners in the City of San Fernando pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 960, "no_votes": 886, "total_votes": 1846, "percent_yes": 52.00433369447454, "percent_no": 47.99566630552546, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.771485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.626124", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of San Fernando, shall all property owners in the City of San Fernando pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11790, "fingerprint": "2004|200400248|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400248|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "518be05e0d0c7002", "measure_id": "200400248", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative to change the procedures to determine utility users' tax rates and refunds in the City of Culver City be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1094, "no_votes": 4666, "total_votes": 5760, "percent_yes": 18.99305555555555, "percent_no": 81.00694444444446, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.735744", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.776353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.629030", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative to change the procedures to determine utility users' tax rates and refunds in the City of Culver City be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8437, "fingerprint": "2004|200400085|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400085|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "44c9b92c2f8e6a6c", "measure_id": "200400085", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of South Gate, shall all property owners in the City of South Gate pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3088, "no_votes": 3261, "total_votes": 6349, "percent_yes": 48.63758072137344, "percent_no": 51.36241927862656, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.771840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.626316", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate funding for library services and facilities to the residents of the City of South Gate, shall all property owners in the City of South Gate pay a special tax per parcel of property not to exceed $25.26 in the initial year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8434, "fingerprint": "2004|200400082|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400082|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6b2aca511ca486e8", "measure_id": "200400082", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which establishes a limited annual parcel tax for Monterey Park public safety protection purposes? The proceeds of the tax are for the Monterey Park Police and Fire Departments to pay for services, wages, benefits, and enhanced retirement plans.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4614, "no_votes": 3298, "total_votes": 7912, "percent_yes": 58.3164812942366, "percent_no": 41.6835187057634, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.770912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.625736", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which establishes a limited annual parcel tax for Monterey Park public safety protection purposes? The proceeds of the tax are for the Monterey Park Police and Fire Departments to pay for services, wages, benefits, and enhanced retirement plans.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8451, "fingerprint": "2004|200400176|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400176|MADERA", "content_hash": "c3a8f5f170a44eab", "measure_id": "200400176", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To finance construction of high school facilities on district-owned property at the northeast corner of Road 200 and Outback way, and related on-site and off-site improvements, shall the Chawanakee Unified School District issue bonds in the amount of $7,400,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent only on school improvements and for no other purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1210, "no_votes": 1551, "total_votes": 2761, "percent_yes": 43.82470119521912, "percent_no": 56.17529880478088, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.784345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.634780", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance construction of high school facilities on district-owned property at the northeast corner of Road 200 and Outback way, and related on-site and off-site improvements, shall the Chawanakee Unified School District issue bonds in the amount of $7,400,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent only on school improvements and for no other purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8452, "fingerprint": "2004|200400438|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400438|MADERA", "content_hash": "1aeaedadec4c3302", "measure_id": "200400438", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall any new sales or utility tax revenues approved by voters be used as follows? The hiring of ten (10) new peace officers; the hiring of nine (9) new firefighters; the construction of one (1) additional fire station; the hiring of six (6) new parks workers; the hiring of three (3) new code enforcement officers. No more than one-half of one percent (0.5%) should be used for administratoin.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5723, "no_votes": 2907, "total_votes": 8630, "percent_yes": 66.31517960602548, "percent_no": 33.68482039397452, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.784616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.635041", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall any new sales or utility tax revenues approved by voters be used as follows? The hiring of ten (10) new peace officers; the hiring of nine (9) new firefighters; the construction of one (1) additional fire station; the hiring of six (6) new parks workers; the hiring of three (3) new code enforcement officers. No more than one-half of one percent (0.5%) should be used for administratoin.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8453, "fingerprint": "2004|200400439|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400439|MADERA", "content_hash": "077511e339024d2a", "measure_id": "200400439", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the city of Madera impose a one-quarter cent (0.25%) increase to the City of Madera sales tax, the proceeds of which shall be used to preserve essential general governmental services including, but not limited to, police and fire protection, parks and recreation, public works, street improvements, code enforcement and other City programs and services? This tax would expire after ten (10) years.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4085, "no_votes": 4733, "total_votes": 8818, "percent_yes": 46.32569743706056, "percent_no": 53.67430256293944, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.784882", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.635302", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city of Madera impose a one-quarter cent (0.25%) increase to the City of Madera sales tax, the proceeds of which shall be used to preserve essential general governmental services including, but not limited to, police and fire protection, parks and recreation, public works, street improvements, code enforcement and other City programs and services? This tax would expire after ten (10) years.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8454, "fingerprint": "2004|200400440|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400440|MADERA", "content_hash": "5e4c77299e661d98", "measure_id": "200400440", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Madera impose a general utility users tax on users of public utilties in the City of Madera at the rate of 1.25% for all utility users--reduced to .75% for all commercial users of gas and electricity; which provides an exemption for certain citizens age 62 and older; said tax to be used for the preservation of essential general governmental services and which tax expires after ten years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2514, "no_votes": 6220, "total_votes": 8734, "percent_yes": 28.78406228532173, "percent_no": 71.21593771467826, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.785150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.635559", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Madera impose a general utility users tax on users of public utilties in the City of Madera at the rate of 1.25% for all utility users--reduced to .75% for all commercial users of gas and electricity; which provides an exemption for certain citizens age 62 and older; said tax to be used for the preservation of essential general governmental services and which tax expires after ten years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8456, "fingerprint": "2004|200400640|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400640|MADERA", "content_hash": "69071994ebaf8920", "measure_id": "200400640", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Chowchilla Union High School District upgrade and construct additional classrooms and facilities, make health and safety improvements, renovate electrical systems, improve student access to computers and modern technology, upgrade restrooms and plumbing systems, replace roofing, renovate the cafeteria, and become eligible to receive $4,300,000 in State grants by issuing $8,100,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2258, "no_votes": 1110, "total_votes": 3368, "percent_yes": 67.04275534441805, "percent_no": 32.957244655581945, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.785689", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.636079", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Chowchilla Union High School District upgrade and construct additional classrooms and facilities, make health and safety improvements, renovate electrical systems, improve student access to computers and modern technology, upgrade restrooms and plumbing systems, replace roofing, renovate the cafeteria, and become eligible to receive $4,300,000 in State grants by issuing $8,100,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8455, "fingerprint": "2004|200400639|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400639|MADERA", "content_hash": "410c8f1313087248", "measure_id": "200400639", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Should the territory of the current Chawanakee Unified School District south of Highway 145 and west of Highway 41 be transferred to the Golden Valley Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3164, "no_votes": 1502, "total_votes": 4666, "percent_yes": 67.80968709815689, "percent_no": 32.190312901843114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.785418", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.635812", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the territory of the current Chawanakee Unified School District south of Highway 145 and west of Highway 41 be transferred to the Golden Valley Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8457, "fingerprint": "2004|200400017|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400017|MARIN", "content_hash": "48027c21748afc0b", "measure_id": "200400017", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall all voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART; (B) New transbay communter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network; (D) New expanded ferry service; (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail. (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51285, "no_votes": 28487, "total_votes": 79772, "percent_yes": 64.28947500376071, "percent_no": 35.710524996239286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.786024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.636334", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall all voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART; (B) New transbay communter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network; (D) New expanded ferry service; (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail. (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11817, "fingerprint": "2004|200400309|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400309|MARIN", "content_hash": "2ef1f832a847755a", "measure_id": "200400309", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To reduce local traffic congestion by implementing a 20-year Transportation Plan that: Maintains and improves bus service, including special services for seniors and disabled persons; Fully funds and completes Highway 101 carpool lanes through San Rafael; Maintains and improves roads, bikeways, sidewalks, and pathways; Reduces school-related congestion and provides safe access to school; Shall Marin County voters authorize a 1/2-cent sales tax to implement the plan, with annual audits and an independent Citzens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 89555, "no_votes": 36187, "total_votes": 125742, "percent_yes": 71.2212307741248, "percent_no": 28.778769225875195, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.748959", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.787992", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.638130", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce local traffic congestion by implementing a 20-year Transportation Plan that: Maintains and improves bus service, including special services for seniors and disabled persons; Fully funds and completes Highway 101 carpool lanes through San Rafael; Maintains and improves roads, bikeways, sidewalks, and pathways; Reduces school-related congestion and provides safe access to school; Shall Marin County voters authorize a 1/2-cent sales tax to implement the plan, with annual audits and an independent Citzens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11816, "fingerprint": "2004|200400256|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400256|MARIN", "content_hash": "8b78889fda8a5039", "measure_id": "200400256", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent the loss of educational programs and staffing, shall the Dixie Elementary School District replace it's existing parcel tax of $125.06 per year with a parcel tax of $245.00 per year, such tax to continue for a period of eight years beginning on July 1, 2004, with a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5134, "no_votes": 1269, "total_votes": 6403, "percent_yes": 80.18116507886927, "percent_no": 19.81883492113073, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.748593", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.787714", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.637881", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent the loss of educational programs and staffing, shall the Dixie Elementary School District replace it's existing parcel tax of $125.06 per year with a parcel tax of $245.00 per year, such tax to continue for a period of eight years beginning on July 1, 2004, with a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8458, "fingerprint": "2004|200400018|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400018|MARIN", "content_hash": "58d54feb50500ab0", "measure_id": "200400018", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved to continue section 3.05.030 of the Marin County Code to sustain the current  transient occupancy tax rate of ten percent (10%) upon transients occupying lodging located only within the unicorporated area of Marin County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60757, "no_votes": 16030, "total_votes": 76787, "percent_yes": 79.12407048068032, "percent_no": 20.875929519319683, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.786301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.636590", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved to continue section 3.05.030 of the Marin County Code to sustain the current  transient occupancy tax rate of ten percent (10%) upon transients occupying lodging located only within the unicorporated area of Marin County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11818, "fingerprint": "2004|200400310|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400310|MARIN", "content_hash": "92e55e01fa9643de", "measure_id": "200400310", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting growth of genetically modified organisms, with exceptions for medical research and treatment be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75313, "no_votes": 46333, "total_votes": 121646, "percent_yes": 61.91161238347336, "percent_no": 38.08838761652664, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.749307", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.788269", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.638377", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting growth of genetically modified organisms, with exceptions for medical research and treatment be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8459, "fingerprint": "2004|200400019|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400019|MARIN", "content_hash": "8ab87128b4f8afd1", "measure_id": "200400019", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved to continue Chapter 5.54 of the Marin County Code to sustain the current business license tax upon all professions, trades, occupations, gainful activities, and all and every kind of calling, within the unincorporated area of Marin County to raise revenue for general governmental purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58530, "no_votes": 18970, "total_votes": 77500, "percent_yes": 75.52258064516128, "percent_no": 24.477419354838716, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.786569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.636848", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved to continue Chapter 5.54 of the Marin County Code to sustain the current business license tax upon all professions, trades, occupations, gainful activities, and all and every kind of calling, within the unincorporated area of Marin County to raise revenue for general governmental purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11819, "fingerprint": "2004|200400641|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400641|MARIN", "content_hash": "54e52aeb71b36e31", "measure_id": "200400641", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide affordable job training and four-year college preparation by using enviromental building practices to improve science labs, classooms, libraries, maintaining educational facilities, updating technology, wiring, improving energy efficiency, fire safety, campus security, disabled access, and repairing, constructing, acquiring, equipping classrooms, labs, sites, facilities, shall Marin Community College District issue $249,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 77102, "no_votes": 45199, "total_votes": 122301, "percent_yes": 63.04282058200669, "percent_no": 36.95717941799331, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.750813", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.789350", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.639203", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide affordable job training and four-year college preparation by using enviromental building practices to improve science labs, classooms, libraries, maintaining educational facilities, updating technology, wiring, improving energy efficiency, fire safety, campus security, disabled access, and repairing, constructing, acquiring, equipping classrooms, labs, sites, facilities, shall Marin Community College District issue $249,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight, no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8460, "fingerprint": "2004|200400086|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400086|MARIN", "content_hash": "6bf3b3b27ec10446", "measure_id": "200400086", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue adjusting its appropriations limit for the annual fire protection and emergency medical services levy, pursuant to Article XIIB of the California Constitution, for the period 7/1/2004 through 6/30/2008? The levy for FY 2004-2005 shall not exceed the rate authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code. (The current level is $444 per residential dwelling unit, $509 per commerical occupancy, and $90 per vacant parcel.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 766, "no_votes": 167, "total_votes": 933, "percent_yes": 82.10075026795283, "percent_no": 17.899249732047167, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.786838", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.637106", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue adjusting its appropriations limit for the annual fire protection and emergency medical services levy, pursuant to Article XIIB of the California Constitution, for the period 7/1/2004 through 6/30/2008? The levy for FY 2004-2005 shall not exceed the rate authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code. (The current level is $444 per residential dwelling unit, $509 per commerical occupancy, and $90 per vacant parcel.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8461, "fingerprint": "2004|200400087|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400087|MARIN", "content_hash": "544943be343a8c64", "measure_id": "200400087", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance authorizing levy of the general municipal services tax from July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2008, thereby increasing the appropriations limit of the Town of Ross, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 606, "no_votes": 332, "total_votes": 938, "percent_yes": 64.60554371002132, "percent_no": 35.39445628997868, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.787137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.637356", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance authorizing levy of the general municipal services tax from July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2008, thereby increasing the appropriations limit of the Town of Ross, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11820, "fingerprint": "2004|200400643|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400643|MARIN", "content_hash": "c154058993b59856", "measure_id": "200400643", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain, restore and improve essential educational programs in Novato's neighborhood schools with emphasis on math, science, and English, attracting and reataining qualified and experienced teachers and employees, reducing class sizes and supporting school library services and classroom technology shall the Novato Unified School District extend it's existing special tax and increase it to $185 per parcel for eight years, with an exemption for seniors, all money staying in our community and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17958, "no_votes": 9259, "total_votes": 27217, "percent_yes": 65.98082081052283, "percent_no": 34.01917918947717, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.751362", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.789943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.639569", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain, restore and improve essential educational programs in Novato's neighborhood schools with emphasis on math, science, and English, attracting and reataining qualified and experienced teachers and employees, reducing class sizes and supporting school library services and classroom technology shall the Novato Unified School District extend it's existing special tax and increase it to $185 per parcel for eight years, with an exemption for seniors, all money staying in our community and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8462, "fingerprint": "2004|200400177|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400177|MARIN", "content_hash": "1e4c313849476fb2", "measure_id": "200400177", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to repair and modernize 1950's era classrooms and facilities at Bacich and Kent schools; install energy-saving solar panels to reduce costs; improve student saftey; replace aging plumbing and electrical systems; upgrade wiring to meet technology standards; replace aging heating and ventilation units; and upgrade facilities to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act requirements, shall Kentfield School District issue $11,900,000 of general obligation bonds at rates below legal limits and appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3259, "no_votes": 1371, "total_votes": 4630, "percent_yes": 70.38876889848812, "percent_no": 29.611231101511876, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.787434", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.637609", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to repair and modernize 1950's era classrooms and facilities at Bacich and Kent schools; install energy-saving solar panels to reduce costs; improve student saftey; replace aging plumbing and electrical systems; upgrade wiring to meet technology standards; replace aging heating and ventilation units; and upgrade facilities to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act requirements, shall Kentfield School District issue $11,900,000 of general obligation bonds at rates below legal limits and appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8464, "fingerprint": "2004|200400442|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400442|MARIN", "content_hash": "555fe8bd22ea9ecb", "measure_id": "200400442", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To allow the City of Novato increased flexibility to seek voter approval to construct city facilities, shall Measure D enacted in November of 1987 be amended to allow for projects of this nature to be voted upon in special elections as long as there is another measure or matter on the same ballot to reduce the costs of holding such special elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13522, "no_votes": 8011, "total_votes": 21533, "percent_yes": 62.796637718850135, "percent_no": 37.203362281149865, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.788813", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.638841", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To allow the City of Novato increased flexibility to seek voter approval to construct city facilities, shall Measure D enacted in November of 1987 be amended to allow for projects of this nature to be voted upon in special elections as long as there is another measure or matter on the same ballot to reduce the costs of holding such special elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8469, "fingerprint": "2004|200400646|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400646|MARIN", "content_hash": "72428c59fffe6d0b", "measure_id": "200400646", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality public high school education including small class sizes and exceptional instructional programs in Belvedere, Bolinas, Corte Madera, Fairfax, Greenbrae, Kentfield, Larkspur, Marin City, Mill Valley, Nicasio, Ross, San Anselmo, San Geronimo, Sausalito, Stinson and Tiburon, Shall Tamalpais Union High School District be authorized to renew a parcel tax for 7 years comencing July 1, 2005, at the current rate plus an annual 3% increase ($199.97 - tax year 2005 - 2006), with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48312, "no_votes": 16426, "total_votes": 64738, "percent_yes": 74.62695789181006, "percent_no": 25.373042108189935, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.790969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.640116", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality public high school education including small class sizes and exceptional instructional programs in Belvedere, Bolinas, Corte Madera, Fairfax, Greenbrae, Kentfield, Larkspur, Marin City, Mill Valley, Nicasio, Ross, San Anselmo, San Geronimo, Sausalito, Stinson and Tiburon, Shall Tamalpais Union High School District be authorized to renew a parcel tax for 7 years comencing July 1, 2005, at the current rate plus an annual 3% increase ($199.97 - tax year 2005 - 2006), with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8466, "fingerprint": "2004|200400642|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400642|MARIN", "content_hash": "6ca70650b959bebb", "measure_id": "200400642", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain school libraries and library services, maintain small class sizes, and aviod the layoff of teachers in Mill Valley Elementary and middle schools, shall the existing instructional parcel tax in Mill Valley be continued for an additional 8 years, including an annual audit and accountability measures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13778, "no_votes": 3949, "total_votes": 17727, "percent_yes": 77.7232470243132, "percent_no": 22.276752975686804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.789675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.639385", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain school libraries and library services, maintain small class sizes, and aviod the layoff of teachers in Mill Valley Elementary and middle schools, shall the existing instructional parcel tax in Mill Valley be continued for an additional 8 years, including an annual audit and accountability measures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8468, "fingerprint": "2004|200400645|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400645|MARIN", "content_hash": "8ccce3441ab58580", "measure_id": "200400645", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To permit Sausalito Marin City School District to finance construction/modernization of Martin Luther King, Jr. Academy, Bayside/Willow Creek modernization, replacement of Bayside School's kindergarten-first grade building; repair of inadequate electrical, heating, ventilation and plumbing; safety improvements, including upgrades to playgrounds and athletic fields; improvements to meet current building codes, improved accessibility, and technology upgrades; shall Sausalito Marin City School District issue $15,900,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with a Citzens' Oversight Committee to audit expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4346, "no_votes": 1565, "total_votes": 5911, "percent_yes": 73.5239384198951, "percent_no": 26.476061580104897, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.790557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.639934", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To permit Sausalito Marin City School District to finance construction/modernization of Martin Luther King, Jr. Academy, Bayside/Willow Creek modernization, replacement of Bayside School's kindergarten-first grade building; repair of inadequate electrical, heating, ventilation and plumbing; safety improvements, including upgrades to playgrounds and athletic fields; improvements to meet current building codes, improved accessibility, and technology upgrades; shall Sausalito Marin City School District issue $15,900,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with a Citzens' Oversight Committee to audit expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8465, "fingerprint": "2004|200400443|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400443|MARIN", "content_hash": "210eb578fcdbf521", "measure_id": "200400443", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance of the City of Sausalito be approved to amend Section 3.12.030 of the City of Sausalito Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax from 10% to an amount not to exceed 12% and shall Sausalito's appropriations limit be correspondingly increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2432, "no_votes": 1701, "total_votes": 4133, "percent_yes": 58.84345511734818, "percent_no": 41.15654488265182, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.789081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.639023", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance of the City of Sausalito be approved to amend Section 3.12.030 of the City of Sausalito Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax from 10% to an amount not to exceed 12% and shall Sausalito's appropriations limit be correspondingly increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8467, "fingerprint": "2004|200400644|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400644|MARIN", "content_hash": "e0db3f210232b083", "measure_id": "200400644", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To keep school libraries open, restore smaller class sizes grades 7-12, restore and maintain computer and technology programs, maintain music and fine art programs, and provide necessary educational programs and materials to the extent funds are available, shall the Petaluma Joint Union High School District be authoried to levy a $50 annual parcel tax for four years, beginning July 1, 2005 with annual citzens' oversight committee, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 130, "no_votes": 56, "total_votes": 186, "percent_yes": 69.89247311827957, "percent_no": 30.107526881720432, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.790242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.639752", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep school libraries open, restore smaller class sizes grades 7-12, restore and maintain computer and technology programs, maintain music and fine art programs, and provide necessary educational programs and materials to the extent funds are available, shall the Petaluma Joint Union High School District be authoried to levy a $50 annual parcel tax for four years, beginning July 1, 2005 with annual citzens' oversight committee, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8463, "fingerprint": "2004|200400441|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400441|MARIN", "content_hash": "6df6b806a9b839a1", "measure_id": "200400441", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted approving the adoption of the Fairfax special municipal services tax upon improved residential property to a maximum rate of one hundred twenty-five dollars for each dwelling unit and upon improved business property to a maximum rate of one hundred twenty-five dollar for each business occupancy and specifying that all proceeds of the special municipal services tax shall be paid into the general fund to be used exclusively for the specific purporses of public safety, including police, fire, emergency medical and public works which includes hazard/safety improvements to our public streets and sidewalks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2525, "no_votes": 1901, "total_votes": 4426, "percent_yes": 57.049254405784, "percent_no": 42.950745594216, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.788541", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.638635", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted approving the adoption of the Fairfax special municipal services tax upon improved residential property to a maximum rate of one hundred twenty-five dollars for each dwelling unit and upon improved business property to a maximum rate of one hundred twenty-five dollar for each business occupancy and specifying that all proceeds of the special municipal services tax shall be paid into the general fund to be used exclusively for the specific purporses of public safety, including police, fire, emergency medical and public works which includes hazard/safety improvements to our public streets and sidewalks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8470, "fingerprint": "2004|200400178|MARIPOSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400178|MARIPOSA", "content_hash": "f7581ad90c92bc30", "measure_id": "200400178", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mariposa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall ordinance no. 996 of the Mariposa County Board of Supervisors, imposing a one-quarter percent (1/4%) transaction and use tax in accordance with the Revenue & Taxation Code, for the purpose of generating revenues to purchase school buses for the Mariposa County Unified School District, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3485, "no_votes": 2610, "total_votes": 6095, "percent_yes": 57.1780147662018, "percent_no": 42.8219852337982, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.791248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.640307", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ordinance no. 996 of the Mariposa County Board of Supervisors, imposing a one-quarter percent (1/4%) transaction and use tax in accordance with the Revenue & Taxation Code, for the purpose of generating revenues to purchase school buses for the Mariposa County Unified School District, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mariposa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8471, "fingerprint": "2004|200400311|MARIPOSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400311|MARIPOSA", "content_hash": "c805d4f88a896cb2", "measure_id": "200400311", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mariposa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall ordinance No. 1008 of the Mariposa County Board of Supervisors, imposing a one-quarter percent (1/4%) transaction and use tax in accordance with the Revenue & Taxation Code, for the purpose of purchasing new school buses for the Mariposa County Unified School District for a period of four (4) years, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4879, "no_votes": 2923, "total_votes": 7802, "percent_yes": 62.5352473724686, "percent_no": 37.4647526275314, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.791526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.640496", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ordinance No. 1008 of the Mariposa County Board of Supervisors, imposing a one-quarter percent (1/4%) transaction and use tax in accordance with the Revenue & Taxation Code, for the purpose of purchasing new school buses for the Mariposa County Unified School District for a period of four (4) years, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mariposa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8473, "fingerprint": "2004|200400088|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400088|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200400088", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2020, "no_votes": 1913, "total_votes": 3933, "percent_yes": 51.36028476989576, "percent_no": 48.63971523010424, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.792156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.640858", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8474, "fingerprint": "2004|200400089|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400089|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "7e3d3f4a86695354", "measure_id": "200400089", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1050 be adopted to impose a transaction (sales) and use tax at a maximum rate of one-half of one percent to be used exclusively for the provision of public safety (police, fire and emergency medical) services within the city limits of the City of Ukiah?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2625, "no_votes": 1519, "total_votes": 4144, "percent_yes": 63.3445945945946, "percent_no": 36.6554054054054, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.792464", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.641040", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1050 be adopted to impose a transaction (sales) and use tax at a maximum rate of one-half of one percent to be used exclusively for the provision of public safety (police, fire and emergency medical) services within the city limits of the City of Ukiah?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8472, "fingerprint": "2004|200400020|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400020|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "3a1774d182d780a0", "measure_id": "200400020", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance titled \"Prohibition on the Propagation, Cultivation, Raising and Growing of Genetically Modified Organisms in Mendocino County\" be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15746, "no_votes": 11881, "total_votes": 27627, "percent_yes": 56.99496869004959, "percent_no": 43.00503130995041, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.791803", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.640679", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance titled \"Prohibition on the Propagation, Cultivation, Raising and Growing of Genetically Modified Organisms in Mendocino County\" be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8475, "fingerprint": "2004|200400179|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400179|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "c4ae0f1d99678c46", "measure_id": "200400179", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of maintaining and restoring academic and educational programs by levying a speical tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of six years, beginning July 1, 2004 and increase its appropriation limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25, "no_votes": 36, "total_votes": 61, "percent_yes": 40.98360655737705, "percent_no": 59.01639344262295, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.792743", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.641223", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of maintaining and restoring academic and educational programs by levying a speical tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of six years, beginning July 1, 2004 and increase its appropriation limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8477, "fingerprint": "2004|200400277|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400277|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "30162879d519d46d", "measure_id": "200400277", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the local Fort Bragg sales tax rate of one cent ($0.01) be increased to one and one-half cent ($0.015) for the express purpose of repairing, maintaining, and reconstructing existing streets, with such increase to expire in ten years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 983, "no_votes": 378, "total_votes": 1361, "percent_yes": 72.22630418809699, "percent_no": 27.77369581190301, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-31", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.793285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.641584", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the local Fort Bragg sales tax rate of one cent ($0.01) be increased to one and one-half cent ($0.015) for the express purpose of repairing, maintaining, and reconstructing existing streets, with such increase to expire in ten years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8476, "fingerprint": "2004|200400275|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400275|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "1ca20799dc58d5b6", "measure_id": "200400275", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinanace No. 126 of the Brooktrails Township Community Services District amending Ordinanace No. 29 and increasing the Special Tax for Fire Protection and Prevention be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 686, "no_votes": 267, "total_votes": 953, "percent_yes": 71.98321091290661, "percent_no": 28.016789087093386, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-31", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.793015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.641405", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinanace No. 126 of the Brooktrails Township Community Services District amending Ordinanace No. 29 and increasing the Special Tax for Fire Protection and Prevention be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8478, "fingerprint": "2004|200400444|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400444|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "05a274760b9bd21f", "measure_id": "200400444", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a tax measure be approved to continue the levy of a special tax in the amount of $18 per parcel for the acquisition of fire equipment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1787, "no_votes": 794, "total_votes": 2581, "percent_yes": 69.23672994963192, "percent_no": 30.763270050368078, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.793554", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.641771", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a tax measure be approved to continue the levy of a special tax in the amount of $18 per parcel for the acquisition of fire equipment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8479, "fingerprint": "2004|200400445|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400445|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "df9abc087c890976", "measure_id": "200400445", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1056 be adopted to impose a transaction (sales) and use tax at a maximum rate of one-half of one percent to be used exclusively for the provision of public safety (police, fire, and emergency medical) services within the city limits of the City of Ukiah?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3745, "no_votes": 1982, "total_votes": 5727, "percent_yes": 65.39200279378383, "percent_no": 34.60799720621617, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.793827", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.641953", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1056 be adopted to impose a transaction (sales) and use tax at a maximum rate of one-half of one percent to be used exclusively for the provision of public safety (police, fire, and emergency medical) services within the city limits of the City of Ukiah?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8480, "fingerprint": "2004|200400647|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400647|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "6c0ef8e2a3fa943a", "measure_id": "200400647", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To finance school improvements such as: facility upgrades, renovations and additions to alleviate overcrowding and comply with current safety standards; add a multipurpose room for school/community recreation and cultural/academic uses; accommodate daycare/preschool programs;  install playground structures; and qualify for State matching grants for eligible projects, shall Manchester Union Elementary School District issue $1,310,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, for acquisition and improvement of real property, with no money for school or district operation salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 151, "no_votes": 104, "total_votes": 255, "percent_yes": 59.21568627450981, "percent_no": 40.78431372549019, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.794160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.642133", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance school improvements such as: facility upgrades, renovations and additions to alleviate overcrowding and comply with current safety standards; add a multipurpose room for school/community recreation and cultural/academic uses; accommodate daycare/preschool programs;  install playground structures; and qualify for State matching grants for eligible projects, shall Manchester Union Elementary School District issue $1,310,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, for acquisition and improvement of real property, with no money for school or district operation salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8481, "fingerprint": "2004|200400648|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400648|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "ec3d420c2adab28d", "measure_id": "200400648", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To strengthen local job and vocation training programs, and increase academic classes for students with 2-year and 4-year college goals by: Adding classrooms and tech labs; Renovating unsafe and deteriorating campus buildings; Reparing; Acquiring, sonctructing, furnishing and equpping college facilites; Shall the Redwoods Community College District issue $40,320,00 of bonds, at legal rates, with tough accountability safeguards, including an independent Citizens Oversight Committee and annual audits-with no money used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7706, "no_votes": 2837, "total_votes": 10543, "percent_yes": 73.09115052641563, "percent_no": 26.908849473584368, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.794485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.642321", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To strengthen local job and vocation training programs, and increase academic classes for students with 2-year and 4-year college goals by: Adding classrooms and tech labs; Renovating unsafe and deteriorating campus buildings; Reparing; Acquiring, sonctructing, furnishing and equpping college facilites; Shall the Redwoods Community College District issue $40,320,00 of bonds, at legal rates, with tough accountability safeguards, including an independent Citizens Oversight Committee and annual audits-with no money used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8482, "fingerprint": "2004|200400180|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400180|MERCED", "content_hash": "82e6f7e75cb673aa", "measure_id": "200400180", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve serious overcrowding and benefit local children and students by adding additional classrooms, to repair and rehabilitate school facilities to meet current health, safety and instructional standards including replacing inadequate lighting, deteriorated plumbing, heating, air conditioning, ventilation and electrical systems, refurbishing classrooms, and restrooms, purchasing property for new school construction, and to establish and independent oversight committee, shall the Atwater Elementary School District issue $11,000,000 in bonds, at the lowest available interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2450, "no_votes": 1791, "total_votes": 4241, "percent_yes": 57.7693940108465, "percent_no": 42.2306059891535, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.794789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.642506", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve serious overcrowding and benefit local children and students by adding additional classrooms, to repair and rehabilitate school facilities to meet current health, safety and instructional standards including replacing inadequate lighting, deteriorated plumbing, heating, air conditioning, ventilation and electrical systems, refurbishing classrooms, and restrooms, purchasing property for new school construction, and to establish and independent oversight committee, shall the Atwater Elementary School District issue $11,000,000 in bonds, at the lowest available interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8483, "fingerprint": "2004|200400181|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400181|MERCED", "content_hash": "b82570305909b712", "measure_id": "200400181", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety, reduce overcrowding, and repair aging facilities including classrooms, libraries, computer labs, multipurpose rooms, transportation and other district facilities, shall the McSwain Union Elementary School District levy an annual special tax on lands within Community Facilities District No. 1, and incur indebtedness of no more than $4,000,000 to pay for school facilities and financing costs, with an appropriations limit of $4,000,000, with guaranteed annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 848, "no_votes": 606, "total_votes": 1454, "percent_yes": 58.32187070151307, "percent_no": 41.67812929848693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.795173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.642694", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety, reduce overcrowding, and repair aging facilities including classrooms, libraries, computer labs, multipurpose rooms, transportation and other district facilities, shall the McSwain Union Elementary School District levy an annual special tax on lands within Community Facilities District No. 1, and incur indebtedness of no more than $4,000,000 to pay for school facilities and financing costs, with an appropriations limit of $4,000,000, with guaranteed annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8493, "fingerprint": "2004|200400650|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400650|MERCED", "content_hash": "f075f394c5b726d3", "measure_id": "200400650", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Modesto Junior College and Columbia College students for jobs and four-year colleges, repair buildings, and increase access to educational opportunities by repairing, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, science labs, establishing new and expanded college education centers in Turlock, Oakdale, Patterson and Calaveras County, and acquiring land, modernizing classroom technology, shall Yosemite Community College District issue $326,174,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2390, "no_votes": 2131, "total_votes": 4521, "percent_yes": 52.8644105286441, "percent_no": 47.1355894713559, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.798330", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.646228", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Modesto Junior College and Columbia College students for jobs and four-year colleges, repair buildings, and increase access to educational opportunities by repairing, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, science labs, establishing new and expanded college education centers in Turlock, Oakdale, Patterson and Calaveras County, and acquiring land, modernizing classroom technology, shall Yosemite Community College District issue $326,174,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8489, "fingerprint": "2004|200400452|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400452|MERCED", "content_hash": "7fcee38b4cae62c9", "measure_id": "200400452", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance amending Title 3, Chapter 15, Section 3-15-3 of the Code of the City of Livingston, providing \"for the privilege and occupancy in any hotel, each transient is subject and shall pay a tax in the amount of nine percent (9%) of the rent charged by the operator\", be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 843, "no_votes": 744, "total_votes": 1587, "percent_yes": 53.11909262759925, "percent_no": 46.88090737240075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.797209", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.645126", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance amending Title 3, Chapter 15, Section 3-15-3 of the Code of the City of Livingston, providing \"for the privilege and occupancy in any hotel, each transient is subject and shall pay a tax in the amount of nine percent (9%) of the rent charged by the operator\", be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8491, "fingerprint": "2004|200400454|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400454|MERCED", "content_hash": "dbf0b739014db4d4", "measure_id": "200400454", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance, creating the Officer Stephan Gray Memorial Public Safety Act and imposing a 1/2 cent special sales tax for 20 years to initially fund 34 additional sworn peace officers within three years and 12 additional sworn fire personnel within three years with remaining revenue to fund additional sworn peace offiicers and sworn fire personnel, and create a Citizens Advisory Oversight Committee, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10710, "no_votes": 6593, "total_votes": 17303, "percent_yes": 61.89678090504537, "percent_no": 38.10321909495463, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.797787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.645679", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance, creating the Officer Stephan Gray Memorial Public Safety Act and imposing a 1/2 cent special sales tax for 20 years to initially fund 34 additional sworn peace officers within three years and 12 additional sworn fire personnel within three years with remaining revenue to fund additional sworn peace offiicers and sworn fire personnel, and create a Citizens Advisory Oversight Committee, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8485, "fingerprint": "2004|200400447|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400447|MERCED", "content_hash": "e1d783defb19149c", "measure_id": "200400447", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters elect a Mayor and Four council members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1129, "no_votes": 342, "total_votes": 1471, "percent_yes": 76.75050985723996, "percent_no": 23.24949014276004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.795744", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.643061", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters elect a Mayor and Four council members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8486, "fingerprint": "2004|200400448|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400448|MERCED", "content_hash": "9c0af7ba4c3aa670", "measure_id": "200400448", "measure_letter": "J-1", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office for the Mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 950, "no_votes": 453, "total_votes": 1403, "percent_yes": 67.712045616536, "percent_no": 32.287954383464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.796010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.643242", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office for the Mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11821, "fingerprint": "2004|200400449|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400449|MERCED", "content_hash": "973af5be1764a531", "measure_id": "200400449", "measure_letter": "J-2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office for the Mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 498, "no_votes": 860, "total_votes": 1358, "percent_yes": 36.67157584683357, "percent_no": 63.32842415316643, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.757293", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.796275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.643433", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office for the Mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8487, "fingerprint": "2004|200400450|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400450|MERCED", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "200400450", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 815, "no_votes": 634, "total_votes": 1449, "percent_yes": 56.24568668046928, "percent_no": 43.75431331953072, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.796549", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.643982", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8488, "fingerprint": "2004|200400451|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400451|MERCED", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200400451", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 851, "no_votes": 600, "total_votes": 1451, "percent_yes": 58.64920744314266, "percent_no": 41.35079255685734, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.796876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.644636", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8492, "fingerprint": "2004|200400649|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400649|MERCED", "content_hash": "75f9c48b9e8a0fed", "measure_id": "200400649", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local elementary school education and protect the health and safety of our children, by repairing inadequate bathrooms, heating/air conditioning, roofs and other school facilities; constructing a multipurpose/gymnasium building to protect children from heat and other weather conditions; and qualifying for state matching funds, shall the Planada Elementary School District issue $1.1 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with an independent oversight commitee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 462, "no_votes": 259, "total_votes": 721, "percent_yes": 64.07766990291263, "percent_no": 35.92233009708737, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.798060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.645959", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local elementary school education and protect the health and safety of our children, by repairing inadequate bathrooms, heating/air conditioning, roofs and other school facilities; constructing a multipurpose/gymnasium building to protect children from heat and other weather conditions; and qualifying for state matching funds, shall the Planada Elementary School District issue $1.1 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with an independent oversight commitee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8490, "fingerprint": "2004|200400453|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400453|MERCED", "content_hash": "cb1b1f06375b84cb", "measure_id": "200400453", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve 9-1-1 police/fire response time, maintain affordable fire insurance rates, purchase protective clothing and equipment for firefighters, serve our growing population by responding to more emergency calls, hire neighborhood police officers, firefighters/EMT's and school police emergency 9-1-1 dispatch system and upgrade/repair/construct fire and police stations, shall Los Banos voters enact a one-half cent sales tax, with citizens oversight and independent annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5677, "no_votes": 1607, "total_votes": 7284, "percent_yes": 77.9379461834157, "percent_no": 22.062053816584296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.797516", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.645406", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve 9-1-1 police/fire response time, maintain affordable fire insurance rates, purchase protective clothing and equipment for firefighters, serve our growing population by responding to more emergency calls, hire neighborhood police officers, firefighters/EMT's and school police emergency 9-1-1 dispatch system and upgrade/repair/construct fire and police stations, shall Los Banos voters enact a one-half cent sales tax, with citizens oversight and independent annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8484, "fingerprint": "2004|200400446|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400446|MERCED", "content_hash": "de65995eeef6aeca", "measure_id": "200400446", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance, establishing a one precent general sales tax limited to a four-year period be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2939, "no_votes": 3682, "total_votes": 6621, "percent_yes": 44.38906509590696, "percent_no": 55.61093490409304, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.795475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.642880", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance, establishing a one precent general sales tax limited to a four-year period be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8494, "fingerprint": "2004|200400651|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400651|MODOC", "content_hash": "78c47d0a435c85d1", "measure_id": "200400651", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize its schools and classrooms; including electrical, heating and plumbing systems; fix leaky roofs; and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Fall River Joint Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, construct and acquire school facilities and equipment and issue $4,400,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 34, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.798658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.646498", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize its schools and classrooms; including electrical, heating and plumbing systems; fix leaky roofs; and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Fall River Joint Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, construct and acquire school facilities and equipment and issue $4,400,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8495, "fingerprint": "2004|200400182|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400182|MONO", "content_hash": "cd575c8d6fac7da7", "measure_id": "200400182", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Eastern Sierra Unified School District be authorized to finance classroom modernization; upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to technology; make health and safety improvements; upgrade plumbing systems; provide energy efficient windows, repair roofs, construct new classrooms, and qualify for State funds by issuing $7.0 million in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher or administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 680, "no_votes": 584, "total_votes": 1264, "percent_yes": 53.79746835443038, "percent_no": 46.20253164556962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.798970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.646791", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Eastern Sierra Unified School District be authorized to finance classroom modernization; upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to technology; make health and safety improvements; upgrade plumbing systems; provide energy efficient windows, repair roofs, construct new classrooms, and qualify for State funds by issuing $7.0 million in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher or administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8496, "fingerprint": "2004|200400652|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400652|MONO", "content_hash": "648d8bac75970407", "measure_id": "200400652", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To accommodate growth; repair and renovate aging electrical, plumbing and air ventilation systems; modernize classrooms; improve technology to meet the demands of a 21st century education; become eligible for millions in State matching funds; improve student safety; all through a comprehensive plan; shall Eastern Sierra Unified School District issue $11.1 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits with no bond money used for administrative and staff salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1067, "no_votes": 757, "total_votes": 1824, "percent_yes": 58.497807017543856, "percent_no": 41.502192982456144, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.799244", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.647063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To accommodate growth; repair and renovate aging electrical, plumbing and air ventilation systems; modernize classrooms; improve technology to meet the demands of a 21st century education; become eligible for millions in State matching funds; improve student safety; all through a comprehensive plan; shall Eastern Sierra Unified School District issue $11.1 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits with no bond money used for administrative and staff salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11823, "fingerprint": "2004|200400462|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400462|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "e7431527a573dad9", "measure_id": "200400462", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance proposing to amend Chapter 32 of the City Code be approved, thereby imposing a half cent transaction and use tax on tangible personal property either purchased or consumed within the City of Salinas, which shall be reduced to a quarter-cent five years after its effective date and shall terminate in its entirety fifteen years after its effective date?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14552, "no_votes": 15639, "total_votes": 30191, "percent_yes": 48.19979464078699, "percent_no": 51.80020535921301, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.762949", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.802892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.650450", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance proposing to amend Chapter 32 of the City Code be approved, thereby imposing a half cent transaction and use tax on tangible personal property either purchased or consumed within the City of Salinas, which shall be reduced to a quarter-cent five years after its effective date and shall terminate in its entirety fifteen years after its effective date?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8499, "fingerprint": "2004|200400184|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400184|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "90a224e227c88cb0", "measure_id": "200400184", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To compensate for the increase in construction costs since 2001, shall the Chualar Union School District be authorized to construct and modernize school facilites and classrooms, complete asbestos abatement, modernize HVAC systems, upgrade restrooms and sewers, replace plumbing systems, upgrade elctrical systems to accommodate access to computers and modern technology, and construct a multipurpose room, by issuing $1,000,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 182, "no_votes": 117, "total_votes": 299, "percent_yes": 60.86956521739131, "percent_no": 39.13043478260869, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.800121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.647922", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To compensate for the increase in construction costs since 2001, shall the Chualar Union School District be authorized to construct and modernize school facilites and classrooms, complete asbestos abatement, modernize HVAC systems, upgrade restrooms and sewers, replace plumbing systems, upgrade elctrical systems to accommodate access to computers and modern technology, and construct a multipurpose room, by issuing $1,000,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8507, "fingerprint": "2004|200400463|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400463|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "5ddc193b59b6b455", "measure_id": "200400463", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance that proposes to raise the maximum annual utility users tax imposed on telephone, elctricity, gas, water, and cable television services from two thousand dollars to four thousand dollars over a four-year period, then increases said tax based on the rate of inflation thereafter, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10393, "no_votes": 19963, "total_votes": 30356, "percent_yes": 34.23705363025431, "percent_no": 65.76294636974569, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.803162", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.650637", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance that proposes to raise the maximum annual utility users tax imposed on telephone, elctricity, gas, water, and cable television services from two thousand dollars to four thousand dollars over a four-year period, then increases said tax based on the rate of inflation thereafter, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8508, "fingerprint": "2004|200400464|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400464|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "2514e75ff34254ed", "measure_id": "200400464", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance proposing to raise business license tax rates to the 1998 level and remove the exemption from such tax for manufacturers, agricultural, and other businesses be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15432, "no_votes": 14833, "total_votes": 30265, "percent_yes": 50.98959193788204, "percent_no": 49.01040806211796, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.803431", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.650816", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance proposing to raise business license tax rates to the 1998 level and remove the exemption from such tax for manufacturers, agricultural, and other businesses be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11824, "fingerprint": "2004|200400653|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400653|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a42afbb1e3294696", "measure_id": "200400653", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To compensate for the increase in construction costs since 2001, shall the Graves School District be authorized to construct and modernize school facilities and classrooms, modernize HVAC systems, upgrade electrical systems to accommodate access to computers and modern technology, by issuing $180,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16, "no_votes": 5, "total_votes": 21, "percent_yes": 76.19047619047619, "percent_no": 23.80952380952381, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.764393", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.803977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.651178", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To compensate for the increase in construction costs since 2001, shall the Graves School District be authorized to construct and modernize school facilities and classrooms, modernize HVAC systems, upgrade electrical systems to accommodate access to computers and modern technology, by issuing $180,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8498, "fingerprint": "2004|200400183|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400183|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "e8debf224254bfbf", "measure_id": "200400183", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To train and prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities and improve safety by providing: Classrooms for health care and job training programs; a university and career readiness center; improved math, science, arts, English and other instructional facilities; and by upgrading, acquiring,constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $118,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 886, "no_votes": 912, "total_votes": 1798, "percent_yes": 49.2769744160178, "percent_no": 50.7230255839822, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.799795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.647620", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To train and prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities and improve safety by providing: Classrooms for health care and job training programs; a university and career readiness center; improved math, science, arts, English and other instructional facilities; and by upgrading, acquiring,constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $118,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8510, "fingerprint": "2004|200400654|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400654|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "906f172e2228d9e4", "measure_id": "200400654", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make health and safety improvements including improvements to restrooms, fire and life-safety systems; upgrade interior lighting; refinish/repair interior walls, wall coverings and floor coverings; upgrade/replace classroom heating/cooling systems; and otherwise modernize and equip classrooms; shall Mission Union Elementary School District issue $315,000 of bonds at legal interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 103, "no_votes": 23, "total_votes": 126, "percent_yes": 81.74603174603175, "percent_no": 18.253968253968253, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.804263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.651358", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make health and safety improvements including improvements to restrooms, fire and life-safety systems; upgrade interior lighting; refinish/repair interior walls, wall coverings and floor coverings; upgrade/replace classroom heating/cooling systems; and otherwise modernize and equip classrooms; shall Mission Union Elementary School District issue $315,000 of bonds at legal interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8502, "fingerprint": "2004|200400456|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400456|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c5974a7df22136f0", "measure_id": "200400456", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance proposing to amend Chapter 3.28 of the City Code by confirming that cellular telephone services are subject to the utility user tax in the same manner and to the same extent as other telephone service, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 399, "no_votes": 1354, "total_votes": 1753, "percent_yes": 22.76098117512835, "percent_no": 77.23901882487165, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.801091", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.649327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance proposing to amend Chapter 3.28 of the City Code by confirming that cellular telephone services are subject to the utility user tax in the same manner and to the same extent as other telephone service, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8503, "fingerprint": "2004|200400457|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400457|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "6587b0f93d2997de", "measure_id": "200400457", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance proposing to amend Chapter 3.28 of the City Code by increasing the utility user tax rate on telephone, electricity, water, gas and cable television services from two percent to four percent during the two-year period January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2006, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 474, "no_votes": 1267, "total_votes": 1741, "percent_yes": 27.22573233773693, "percent_no": 72.77426766226307, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.801360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.649514", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance proposing to amend Chapter 3.28 of the City Code by increasing the utility user tax rate on telephone, electricity, water, gas and cable television services from two percent to four percent during the two-year period January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2006, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8504, "fingerprint": "2004|200400458|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400458|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "98ade9ffac567f25", "measure_id": "200400458", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance proposing to amend Chapter 3.28 of the City Code by removing the two thousand dollar maximum utility users' tax payable on telephone, electricity, water, gas, and cable television services in any one calendar year, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 590, "no_votes": 1138, "total_votes": 1728, "percent_yes": 34.14351851851852, "percent_no": 65.85648148148148, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.801761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.649713", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance proposing to amend Chapter 3.28 of the City Code by removing the two thousand dollar maximum utility users' tax payable on telephone, electricity, water, gas, and cable television services in any one calendar year, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8506, "fingerprint": "2004|200400461|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400461|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "b423abf581792b34", "measure_id": "200400461", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Pacific Grove Municipal Code be changed to prohibit the construction of all new buildings in the \"O\" zones of the City and to limit enlargment of existing buildings in the \"O\" zone of the city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3861, "no_votes": 3991, "total_votes": 7852, "percent_yes": 49.17218543046358, "percent_no": 50.82781456953642, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.802620", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.650262", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pacific Grove Municipal Code be changed to prohibit the construction of all new buildings in the \"O\" zones of the City and to limit enlargment of existing buildings in the \"O\" zone of the city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8501, "fingerprint": "2004|200400455|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400455|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "27f69023af0058e8", "measure_id": "200400455", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to raise the City of Greenfield's existing Utility User Tax by 3%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 358, "no_votes": 1465, "total_votes": 1823, "percent_yes": 19.63795940756994, "percent_no": 80.36204059243006, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.800820", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.649114", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to raise the City of Greenfield's existing Utility User Tax by 3%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11822, "fingerprint": "2004|200400460|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400460|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d96c1935da9262c2", "measure_id": "200400460", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance imposing a temporary transactions and use tax (sales tax) rate increase of one-quarter of one percent (0.25%) which will end after five years, be adopted to help limit further service reductions and budget cuts in the City's General Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5463, "no_votes": 5656, "total_votes": 11119, "percent_yes": 49.13211619749977, "percent_no": 50.86788380250023, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.762335", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.802336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.650081", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance imposing a temporary transactions and use tax (sales tax) rate increase of one-quarter of one percent (0.25%) which will end after five years, be adopted to help limit further service reductions and budget cuts in the City's General Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8500, "fingerprint": "2004|200400185|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400185|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a7f7735a28800381", "measure_id": "200400185", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high quality local education, protect local schools from state budget cuts, keep school libraries open, avoid 40% increases in class size (K-3), prevent layoffs of qualified, experienced teachers, and maintain/restore classroom instruction and educational programs that directly enhance student achievement, shall Washington Union School District levy an assessment of $10.00 per parcel per month for seven years beginning July 1, 2004, with independent community fiscal oversight, annual audits and no funds used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1845, "no_votes": 1300, "total_votes": 3145, "percent_yes": 58.66454689984102, "percent_no": 41.33545310015898, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.800546", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.648323", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high quality local education, protect local schools from state budget cuts, keep school libraries open, avoid 40% increases in class size (K-3), prevent layoffs of qualified, experienced teachers, and maintain/restore classroom instruction and educational programs that directly enhance student achievement, shall Washington Union School District levy an assessment of $10.00 per parcel per month for seven years beginning July 1, 2004, with independent community fiscal oversight, annual audits and no funds used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8509, "fingerprint": "2004|200400465|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400465|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "967f499914963ba1", "measure_id": "200400465", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be adopted imposing a transactions and use tax at the rate of one-half of one percent (0.50%) on the retail sale of goods in Sand City, to be used for general City purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46, "no_votes": 36, "total_votes": 82, "percent_yes": 56.09756097560976, "percent_no": 43.90243902439024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.803707", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.650997", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be adopted imposing a transactions and use tax at the rate of one-half of one percent (0.50%) on the retail sale of goods in Sand City, to be used for general City purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8505, "fingerprint": "2004|200400459|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400459|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "8b6e75047e1497d5", "measure_id": "200400459", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "May the City Council impose, for periods not to exceed two years, the Utility Users' Tax pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 3.14, for general government purposes, in an amount not to exceed 5%, after public hearing(s) and making written findings that the funds are needed for basic public safety, health, youth and senior citizens services? The tax may be overturned ay time by subsequent referendum vote and may not be imposed after January 1, 2011.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3059, "no_votes": 3170, "total_votes": 6229, "percent_yes": 49.10900626103708, "percent_no": 50.89099373896292, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.802066", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.649898", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "May the City Council impose, for periods not to exceed two years, the Utility Users' Tax pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 3.14, for general government purposes, in an amount not to exceed 5%, after public hearing(s) and making written findings that the funds are needed for basic public safety, health, youth and senior citizens services? The tax may be overturned ay time by subsequent referendum vote and may not be imposed after January 1, 2011.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8497, "fingerprint": "2004|200400090|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400090|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d6a4082653922f0b", "measure_id": "200400090", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinanace No. 2426 be enacted; the Ordinance will fund operations of the firefighter-paramedic program, which provides advanced life saving support to victims in need of emergency medical care by establishing a \"special tax\" on real property within City limits in an amount of $20 per benefit unit that is reviewed annually by the Monterey County Civil Grand Jury until the \"special tax\" expires on December 31, 2014, unless subsequently approved for extension by Salinas voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8491, "no_votes": 7022, "total_votes": 15513, "percent_yes": 54.73473860633018, "percent_no": 45.26526139366982, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.799518", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.647340", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinanace No. 2426 be enacted; the Ordinance will fund operations of the firefighter-paramedic program, which provides advanced life saving support to victims in need of emergency medical care by establishing a \"special tax\" on real property within City limits in an amount of $20 per benefit unit that is reviewed annually by the Monterey County Civil Grand Jury until the \"special tax\" expires on December 31, 2014, unless subsequently approved for extension by Salinas voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8516, "fingerprint": "2004|200400091|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400091|NAPA", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "200400091", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 607, "no_votes": 590, "total_votes": 1197, "percent_yes": 50.71010860484545, "percent_no": 49.28989139515455, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.806217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.652451", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8511, "fingerprint": "2004|200400021|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400021|NAPA", "content_hash": "67f77867a3721c3b", "measure_id": "200400021", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 04-1 be adopted? (General Plan amendment (i) prohibiting timber operations, as defined, within 1000 feet of a wetland or home, 75 feet of a seep or spring, and 50 to 325 feet of varioius streams on timberlands in the unincorporated areas of the County unless the land is zoned for timber productions; (ii) creating certain exemptions; and (iii) imposing civil and criminal penalties for violations.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9532, "no_votes": 25709, "total_votes": 35241, "percent_yes": 27.04804063448824, "percent_no": 72.95195936551175, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.804602", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.651539", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 04-1 be adopted? (General Plan amendment (i) prohibiting timber operations, as defined, within 1000 feet of a wetland or home, 75 feet of a seep or spring, and 50 to 325 feet of varioius streams on timberlands in the unincorporated areas of the County unless the land is zoned for timber productions; (ii) creating certain exemptions; and (iii) imposing civil and criminal penalties for violations.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8512, "fingerprint": "2004|200400022|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400022|NAPA", "content_hash": "dabf62c7c263adb7", "measure_id": "200400022", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 1221 be adopted? (Amends Napa County Code (i) to establish standard Stream setbacks for non-residential projects to 100 to 150 feet on all Class I streams, 75 to 150 feet on all Class II streams, and 25 feet on all Class III streams; and (ii) to establish exemptions to stream setbacks proposed for projects having little, if any, potential to effect stream function.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12051, "no_votes": 22990, "total_votes": 35041, "percent_yes": 34.391141805313765, "percent_no": 65.60885819468623, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.804914", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.651724", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 1221 be adopted? (Amends Napa County Code (i) to establish standard Stream setbacks for non-residential projects to 100 to 150 feet on all Class I streams, 75 to 150 feet on all Class II streams, and 25 feet on all Class III streams; and (ii) to establish exemptions to stream setbacks proposed for projects having little, if any, potential to effect stream function.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8513, "fingerprint": "2004|200400023|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400023|NAPA", "content_hash": "8dc546c1c3b0713f", "measure_id": "200400023", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinanace No. 04-02 be adopted? (Amends Napa County General plan and Zoning Ordinance (i) creating a \"Community Deli\" Zoning District, (ii) outlining uses allowed with and without use permits, (iii) rezoning two parcels at 7787 St. Helena Highway and 1207 Oakville Cross Road (APN 027-300-021 and 027-300-020) from Agricultural Preserve to Community Deli, and (iv) requiring a vote of the people to rezone parcels to Community Deli.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13840, "no_votes": 20708, "total_votes": 34548, "percent_yes": 40.06020609007757, "percent_no": 59.93979390992243, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.805184", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.651907", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinanace No. 04-02 be adopted? (Amends Napa County General plan and Zoning Ordinance (i) creating a \"Community Deli\" Zoning District, (ii) outlining uses allowed with and without use permits, (iii) rezoning two parcels at 7787 St. Helena Highway and 1207 Oakville Cross Road (APN 027-300-021 and 027-300-020) from Agricultural Preserve to Community Deli, and (iv) requiring a vote of the people to rezone parcels to Community Deli.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8514, "fingerprint": "2004|200400024|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400024|NAPA", "content_hash": "dd058cb8390f1230", "measure_id": "200400024", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 04-03 be adopted? (Amends Napa County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance (i) creating a \"Rural Market\" Zoning District, (ii) outlining which uses are allowed with and without a use permit, (iii) rezoning the parcel located at 5850 Chiles-Pope Valley Road (APN 18-100-002) from Agricultural Watershed to Rural Market, and (iv) requiring a vote of the people to rezone parcels to Rural Market.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15174, "no_votes": 19031, "total_votes": 34205, "percent_yes": 44.36193538956293, "percent_no": 55.63806461043707, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.805454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.652090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 04-03 be adopted? (Amends Napa County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance (i) creating a \"Rural Market\" Zoning District, (ii) outlining which uses are allowed with and without a use permit, (iii) rezoning the parcel located at 5850 Chiles-Pope Valley Road (APN 18-100-002) from Agricultural Watershed to Rural Market, and (iv) requiring a vote of the people to rezone parcels to Rural Market.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8515, "fingerprint": "2004|200400025|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400025|NAPA", "content_hash": "f96c2a7255de1777", "measure_id": "200400025", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 04-04 be adopted? (Amends the Napa County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance to (i) allow certain specified uses on qualifying parcels which are zoned Marine Commercial by a vote of the people and (ii) rezone two parcels located at 3333 Cuttings Wharf Road (APN 047-261-009 and 047-261-007) from Agricultural Watershed to Marine Commercial: Airport.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12891, "no_votes": 21137, "total_votes": 34028, "percent_yes": 37.88350769954155, "percent_no": 62.11649230045845, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.805792", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.652272", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 04-04 be adopted? (Amends the Napa County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance to (i) allow certain specified uses on qualifying parcels which are zoned Marine Commercial by a vote of the people and (ii) rezone two parcels located at 3333 Cuttings Wharf Road (APN 047-261-009 and 047-261-007) from Agricultural Watershed to Marine Commercial: Airport.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8517, "fingerprint": "2004|200400312|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400312|NAPA", "content_hash": "27313e1f6d76387c", "measure_id": "200400312", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-05 be adopted? (Amends Napa County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance (i) creating a \"Rural Dining\" Zoning District, (ii) outlining uses allowed with and without use permits, (iii) rezoning the parcel at 7787 St Helena Highway (APN 027-300-021) from Agricultural Preserve to Rural Dining, and (iv) requiring a vote of the people to rezone additional parcels to the rural Dining Zoning District)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22956, "no_votes": 28568, "total_votes": 51524, "percent_yes": 44.55399425510442, "percent_no": 55.44600574489558, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.806577", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.652641", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-05 be adopted? (Amends Napa County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance (i) creating a \"Rural Dining\" Zoning District, (ii) outlining uses allowed with and without use permits, (iii) rezoning the parcel at 7787 St Helena Highway (APN 027-300-021) from Agricultural Preserve to Rural Dining, and (iv) requiring a vote of the people to rezone additional parcels to the rural Dining Zoning District)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8518, "fingerprint": "2004|200400313|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400313|NAPA", "content_hash": "d366ef7f96b82b74", "measure_id": "200400313", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-06 take effect? (Ordinance 04-06, if a majority of the voters approve it, will take effect and increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) applicable in the unincorporated area from 10 1/2% to 12% and require the proceeds of this Hotel Tax increase to be used for general public purposes).", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32351, "no_votes": 19426, "total_votes": 51777, "percent_yes": 62.48141066496707, "percent_no": 37.51858933503293, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.806889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.652821", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-06 take effect? (Ordinance 04-06, if a majority of the voters approve it, will take effect and increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) applicable in the unincorporated area from 10 1/2% to 12% and require the proceeds of this Hotel Tax increase to be used for general public purposes).", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8519, "fingerprint": "2004|200400314|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400314|NAPA", "content_hash": "8e14acc3d646d35c", "measure_id": "200400314", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Do you support widening Jamieson Canyon Road (Highway 12, from I-80 to Highway 29) from two lanes to four lanes to improve traffic capacity using a combination of state, federal and local dollars?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42041, "no_votes": 12164, "total_votes": 54205, "percent_yes": 77.55926575039203, "percent_no": 22.44073424960797, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.807158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.653003", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you support widening Jamieson Canyon Road (Highway 12, from I-80 to Highway 29) from two lanes to four lanes to improve traffic capacity using a combination of state, federal and local dollars?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8520, "fingerprint": "2004|200400186|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400186|NEVADA", "content_hash": "e0d23a6f318486c0", "measure_id": "200400186", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Sierra College Campuses in Rocklin, Nevada County, Roseville, Lincoln, Truckee by: Fixing faulty sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls; Expanding nursing/police/firefighting centers; Upgrading classroom wiring; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall Sierra Joint Community College District issue $394,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18662, "no_votes": 15345, "total_votes": 34007, "percent_yes": 54.87693710118505, "percent_no": 45.12306289881495, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.807428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.653185", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Sierra College Campuses in Rocklin, Nevada County, Roseville, Lincoln, Truckee by: Fixing faulty sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls; Expanding nursing/police/firefighting centers; Upgrading classroom wiring; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall Sierra Joint Community College District issue $394,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8521, "fingerprint": "2004|200400655|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400655|NEVADA", "content_hash": "a3288e0dc98584d2", "measure_id": "200400655", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Western Nevada County area students for jobs/four-year colleges, provide for lifelong learning, improve safety, and accommodate increasing enrollment by repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms, labs, and libraries, shall School Facilities Improvement District Number 2 (Western Nevada County Campus Area) of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $44,400,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with no money for administrators' salaries, and with citizen oversight and guaranteed annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24877, "no_votes": 16789, "total_votes": 41666, "percent_yes": 59.70575529208468, "percent_no": 40.29424470791532, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.807746", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.653369", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Western Nevada County area students for jobs/four-year colleges, provide for lifelong learning, improve safety, and accommodate increasing enrollment by repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms, labs, and libraries, shall School Facilities Improvement District Number 2 (Western Nevada County Campus Area) of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $44,400,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with no money for administrators' salaries, and with citizen oversight and guaranteed annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8522, "fingerprint": "2004|200400656|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400656|NEVADA", "content_hash": "abeccfcca5751a5d", "measure_id": "200400656", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Tahoe-Truckee area students for jobs/four-year colleges, provide for lifelong learning, and accommodate increasing enrollment by acquiring, constructing, equipping, repairing buildings, sites, classrooms, labs, libraries to complete a permanent campus, shall School Facilities Improvement District Number 1 (Tahoe-Truckee Campus Area) of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $35,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with no money for adminstrators' salaries, and with citizen oversight and guaranteed annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4691, "no_votes": 2208, "total_votes": 6899, "percent_yes": 67.99536164661545, "percent_no": 32.00463835338455, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.808044", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.653556", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Tahoe-Truckee area students for jobs/four-year colleges, provide for lifelong learning, and accommodate increasing enrollment by acquiring, constructing, equipping, repairing buildings, sites, classrooms, labs, libraries to complete a permanent campus, shall School Facilities Improvement District Number 1 (Tahoe-Truckee Campus Area) of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $35,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with no money for adminstrators' salaries, and with citizen oversight and guaranteed annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11830, "fingerprint": "2004|200400657|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400657|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ec909e5330ae7928", "measure_id": "200400657", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the District issue and sell bonds of the District in the amount not to exceed $196,000,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42928, "no_votes": 35712, "total_votes": 78640, "percent_yes": 54.58799593082401, "percent_no": 45.41200406917599, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.773223", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.813574", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.657082", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the District issue and sell bonds of the District in the amount not to exceed $196,000,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8527, "fingerprint": "2004|200400188|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400188|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a21386ac57fd1d13", "measure_id": "200400188", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve all Orange Unified School District (OUSD) schools, shall OUSD: Upgrade/replace deteriorating plumbing, restrooms, roofs, electrical systems, science/computer labs, and libraries; improve student safety in drop-off areas; construct classrooms, high schools, middle schools and elementary schools to alleviate overcrowding; qualify for state grants; address building safety/access requirements, and make necessary improvements to school facilities by issuing $200 million of bonds at legal interest rates providing annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21797, "no_votes": 22778, "total_votes": 44575, "percent_yes": 48.89960740325294, "percent_no": 51.10039259674706, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.809460", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.654488", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve all Orange Unified School District (OUSD) schools, shall OUSD: Upgrade/replace deteriorating plumbing, restrooms, roofs, electrical systems, science/computer labs, and libraries; improve student safety in drop-off areas; construct classrooms, high schools, middle schools and elementary schools to alleviate overcrowding; qualify for state grants; address building safety/access requirements, and make necessary improvements to school facilities by issuing $200 million of bonds at legal interest rates providing annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11825, "fingerprint": "2004|200400466|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400466|ORANGE", "content_hash": "36f67c9b45e3ca37", "measure_id": "200400466", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City be authorized to spend the revenue it receives from the proceeds of taxes, provided that it does not exceed the appropriation limit established by this measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9200, "no_votes": 5955, "total_votes": 15155, "percent_yes": 60.706037611349394, "percent_no": 39.293962388650606, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.769803", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.810118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.654852", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City be authorized to spend the revenue it receives from the proceeds of taxes, provided that it does not exceed the appropriation limit established by this measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8528, "fingerprint": "2004|200400189|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400189|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d19e97bff9693c69", "measure_id": "200400189", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety, repair and upgrade every neighborhood school in the Saddleback Valley Unified School District by: fixing leaky roofs, removing asbestos, upgrading outdated plumbing/sewer systems, installing fire safety equipment, upgrading heating/ventilatoin systems and electrical wiring for technology; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries, science labs, sites and facilities; shall the Saddleback Valley Unified School District issue $180,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31024, "no_votes": 21424, "total_votes": 52448, "percent_yes": 59.15192190359976, "percent_no": 40.84807809640024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.809842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.654671", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety, repair and upgrade every neighborhood school in the Saddleback Valley Unified School District by: fixing leaky roofs, removing asbestos, upgrading outdated plumbing/sewer systems, installing fire safety equipment, upgrading heating/ventilatoin systems and electrical wiring for technology; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries, science labs, sites and facilities; shall the Saddleback Valley Unified School District issue $180,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual independent financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11826, "fingerprint": "2004|200400467|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400467|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d298e66686d0d04f", "measure_id": "200400467", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Brea increase business taxes as outlined in this measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6467, "no_votes": 9520, "total_votes": 15987, "percent_yes": 40.45161693876274, "percent_no": 59.54838306123726, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.770084", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.810399", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.655039", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Brea increase business taxes as outlined in this measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8526, "fingerprint": "2004|200400187|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400187|ORANGE", "content_hash": "68066d6890d962d6", "measure_id": "200400187", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Neightborhood School Safety/Repair Measure: To repair/upgrade neighborhood schools, classrooms, restrooms, libraries at all Fountain Valley, Westminster, Huntington Beach high schools; instal/repair fire alarms/security systems; repair leaky roofs, cracked walls, plumbing, electrical systems; improve seismic safety; stabilize sinking buildings; build new classrooms to replace old portables/reduce overcrowding; and remove asbestos/leadpaint, shall Huntington Beach Union High School District issue $238,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42469, "no_votes": 30682, "total_votes": 73151, "percent_yes": 58.05662260256182, "percent_no": 41.94337739743818, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.809177", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.654303", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Neightborhood School Safety/Repair Measure: To repair/upgrade neighborhood schools, classrooms, restrooms, libraries at all Fountain Valley, Westminster, Huntington Beach high schools; instal/repair fire alarms/security systems; repair leaky roofs, cracked walls, plumbing, electrical systems; improve seismic safety; stabilize sinking buildings; build new classrooms to replace old portables/reduce overcrowding; and remove asbestos/leadpaint, shall Huntington Beach Union High School District issue $238,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11827, "fingerprint": "2004|200400468|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400468|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c18b6fb358536385", "measure_id": "200400468", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to transfer the authority to appoint and direct the City Clerk from the City Council to the City Manager?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6631, "no_votes": 9651, "total_votes": 16282, "percent_yes": 40.72595504237808, "percent_no": 59.27404495762192, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.770358", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.810679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.655226", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to transfer the authority to appoint and direct the City Clerk from the City Council to the City Manager?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8523, "fingerprint": "2004|200400092|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400092|ORANGE", "content_hash": "607c8597230729c6", "measure_id": "200400092", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance No. 1439 prohibiting the sale, use or discharge of \"safe and sane\" fireworks take effect?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4536, "no_votes": 6879, "total_votes": 11415, "percent_yes": 39.73718791064389, "percent_no": 60.26281208935611, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.808340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.653744", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance No. 1439 prohibiting the sale, use or discharge of \"safe and sane\" fireworks take effect?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11828, "fingerprint": "2004|200400469|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400469|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1ef48efcda41a1fa", "measure_id": "200400469", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to transfer the authority to appoint and direct the City Treasurer form the City Council to the City Manager?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5931, "no_votes": 10306, "total_votes": 16237, "percent_yes": 36.52768368540987, "percent_no": 63.47231631459013, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.770627", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.810947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.655411", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to transfer the authority to appoint and direct the City Treasurer form the City Council to the City Manager?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8524, "fingerprint": "2004|200400093|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400093|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2956aec37a246c2b", "measure_id": "200400093", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Huntington Beach City Charter be amended, effective with the November 2004 General Municipal Election, to provide for: (1) electing five councilmembers instead of the current seven members; (2) dividing the city into five separately elected council districts, instead of the current city wide vote; and (3) imposing an eight-year (two four-year terms) lifetime limit on a councilmember's term of office, intead of the current limit of two consecutive four-year terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17876, "no_votes": 30691, "total_votes": 48567, "percent_yes": 36.80688533366277, "percent_no": 63.19311466633723, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.808640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.653930", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Huntington Beach City Charter be amended, effective with the November 2004 General Municipal Election, to provide for: (1) electing five councilmembers instead of the current seven members; (2) dividing the city into five separately elected council districts, instead of the current city wide vote; and (3) imposing an eight-year (two four-year terms) lifetime limit on a councilmember's term of office, intead of the current limit of two consecutive four-year terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11829, "fingerprint": "2004|200400470|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400470|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d55b610e9875c73f", "measure_id": "200400470", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to permit the use of the design-build process in connection with capital improvement projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8968, "no_votes": 6878, "total_votes": 15846, "percent_yes": 56.59472422062351, "percent_no": 43.40527577937649, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.770891", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.811216", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.655597", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to permit the use of the design-build process in connection with capital improvement projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8525, "fingerprint": "2004|200400094|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400094|ORANGE", "content_hash": "818e8e5a5bc5b267", "measure_id": "200400094", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on December 11,2002, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County ordering the annexation to the City of Yorba Linda of the territory described in that order and designated \"Center City Annexation to the City of Yorba Linda\" be confirmed subject ot the terms and conditions specified in that order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 304, "no_votes": 681, "total_votes": 985, "percent_yes": 30.862944162436552, "percent_no": 69.13705583756345, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.808908", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.654122", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on December 11,2002, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County ordering the annexation to the City of Yorba Linda of the territory described in that order and designated \"Center City Annexation to the City of Yorba Linda\" be confirmed subject ot the terms and conditions specified in that order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8529, "fingerprint": "2004|200400471|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400471|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0e2f1a02685bd5fb", "measure_id": "200400471", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1012 of the City Charter be amended to permit the use of the request for proposal process in connection with capital improvement project maintenance contracts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10181, "no_votes": 6274, "total_votes": 16455, "percent_yes": 61.87177149802492, "percent_no": 38.12822850197508, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.811483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.655779", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1012 of the City Charter be amended to permit the use of the request for proposal process in connection with capital improvement project maintenance contracts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8530, "fingerprint": "2004|200400472|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400472|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d0fa6c8957ba85b4", "measure_id": "200400472", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the title and job description set forth in Section 704 of the City Charter be amended to reflect a change in title and job description for this department administrator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10350, "no_votes": 5526, "total_votes": 15876, "percent_yes": 65.19274376417233, "percent_no": 34.807256235827666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.811764", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.655958", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the title and job description set forth in Section 704 of the City Charter be amended to reflect a change in title and job description for this department administrator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8531, "fingerprint": "2004|200400473|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400473|ORANGE", "content_hash": "237894c9d0039307", "measure_id": "200400473", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall term limits be imposed on Fountain Valley City Council Members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17389, "no_votes": 6128, "total_votes": 23517, "percent_yes": 73.94225453926947, "percent_no": 26.05774546073053, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.812164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.656139", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall term limits be imposed on Fountain Valley City Council Members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8532, "fingerprint": "2004|200400474|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400474|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ecf907255990f504", "measure_id": "200400474", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall basic business license fees in the City of Fountain Valley be increased from $50 to $75?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9109, "no_votes": 14604, "total_votes": 23713, "percent_yes": 38.41352844431324, "percent_no": 61.58647155568676, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.812432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.656322", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall basic business license fees in the City of Fountain Valley be increased from $50 to $75?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8533, "fingerprint": "2004|200400475|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400475|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1c17264854f6939c", "measure_id": "200400475", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Mission Viejo's transient occupancy tax be increased as outlined in this measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17544, "no_votes": 25690, "total_votes": 43234, "percent_yes": 40.57917379839941, "percent_no": 59.42082620160059, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.812751", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.656505", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Mission Viejo's transient occupancy tax be increased as outlined in this measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8534, "fingerprint": "2004|200400476|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400476|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2906883aec671527", "measure_id": "200400476", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Newport Beach General Plan be amended to be consistent with the Marinapark Resort and Community Plan (Project)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14798, "no_votes": 29997, "total_votes": 44795, "percent_yes": 33.03493693492577, "percent_no": 66.96506306507423, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.813028", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.656717", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Newport Beach General Plan be amended to be consistent with the Marinapark Resort and Community Plan (Project)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8535, "fingerprint": "2004|200400477|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400477|ORANGE", "content_hash": "49a75f490b2f414c", "measure_id": "200400477", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council receive approval to raise the City's Hotel Visitor Tax (HVT) 2% from the current rate of 9% to 11%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28445, "no_votes": 21563, "total_votes": 50008, "percent_yes": 56.880899056151016, "percent_no": 43.119100943848984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.813292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.656899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council receive approval to raise the City's Hotel Visitor Tax (HVT) 2% from the current rate of 9% to 11%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8536, "fingerprint": "2004|200400190|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400190|PLACER", "content_hash": "c8eb884c1d0e662b", "measure_id": "200400190", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Sierra College Campuses in Rocklin, Nevada County, Roseville, Lincoln, Truckee by: Fixing faulty sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls; Expanding nursing/police firefighting centers; Upgrading classroom wiring; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall Sierra Joint Community College District issue $394,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43053, "no_votes": 47803, "total_votes": 90856, "percent_yes": 47.38597340847054, "percent_no": 52.61402659152946, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.813851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.657269", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Sierra College Campuses in Rocklin, Nevada County, Roseville, Lincoln, Truckee by: Fixing faulty sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls; Expanding nursing/police firefighting centers; Upgrading classroom wiring; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall Sierra Joint Community College District issue $394,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8540, "fingerprint": "2004|200400661|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400661|PLACER", "content_hash": "b4f01701bb2c7ad5", "measure_id": "200400661", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Tahoe-Truckee area students for jobs/four-year colleges, provide for lifelong learning, and accommodate increasing enrollment by acquiring, constructing, equipping, repairing buildings, sites, classrooms, labs, libraries to complete a permanent campus, shall School Facilities Improvement District Number 1 (Tahoe-Truckee Campus Area) of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $35,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with no money for administrators' salaries, and with citizen oversight and guaranteed annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4165, "no_votes": 1808, "total_votes": 5973, "percent_yes": 69.73045370835426, "percent_no": 30.26954629164574, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.815109", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.658004", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Tahoe-Truckee area students for jobs/four-year colleges, provide for lifelong learning, and accommodate increasing enrollment by acquiring, constructing, equipping, repairing buildings, sites, classrooms, labs, libraries to complete a permanent campus, shall School Facilities Improvement District Number 1 (Tahoe-Truckee Campus Area) of Sierra Joint Community College District issue $35,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with no money for administrators' salaries, and with citizen oversight and guaranteed annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8539, "fingerprint": "2004|200400660|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400660|PLACER", "content_hash": "76a73b350215a993", "measure_id": "200400660", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve school overcrowding, enhance student safety, upgrade technology to remain current, bring old classroom buildings and school facilities up to standards of new schools, construct additional classrooms at existing campuses, acquire/improve property, equip and construct one new high school, shall the Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $79 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint an independent Citizen's Oversight Committee and perform annual audits, with no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30781, "no_votes": 22904, "total_votes": 53685, "percent_yes": 57.33631368166154, "percent_no": 42.66368631833846, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.814836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.657822", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve school overcrowding, enhance student safety, upgrade technology to remain current, bring old classroom buildings and school facilities up to standards of new schools, construct additional classrooms at existing campuses, acquire/improve property, equip and construct one new high school, shall the Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $79 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint an independent Citizen's Oversight Committee and perform annual audits, with no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8538, "fingerprint": "2004|200400659|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400659|PLACER", "content_hash": "efe1c1feca800ae8", "measure_id": "200400659", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Penryn Elementary School District annex into the Loomis Union School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7334, "no_votes": 2121, "total_votes": 9455, "percent_yes": 77.56742464304601, "percent_no": 22.43257535695399, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.814545", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.657643", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Penryn Elementary School District annex into the Loomis Union School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8537, "fingerprint": "2004|200400658|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400658|PLACER", "content_hash": "12a3e1bd373dca17", "measure_id": "200400658", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For all schools, to provide additional support in reading/math, restore library and computer staff, upgrade technology, and maintain music and drama programs, and offer the opportunity to keep all schools open, shall the Auburn Union School District be authorized to collect an annual qualified special tax of $44 per taxable parcel, beginning July 1, 2005 for a period of five years, offering a senior exemption and with all expenditures monitored by an independent oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8696, "no_votes": 6941, "total_votes": 15637, "percent_yes": 55.61169022190957, "percent_no": 44.38830977809043, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.814201", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.657459", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For all schools, to provide additional support in reading/math, restore library and computer staff, upgrade technology, and maintain music and drama programs, and offer the opportunity to keep all schools open, shall the Auburn Union School District be authorized to collect an annual qualified special tax of $44 per taxable parcel, beginning July 1, 2005 for a period of five years, offering a senior exemption and with all expenditures monitored by an independent oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8546, "fingerprint": "2004|200400192|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400192|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f92868a1afea3685", "measure_id": "200400192", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding, repair and upgrade local schools including health and safety improvements to classrooms and qualify for an estimated $30,000,000 in State grants, shall Moreno Valley Unified School District construct additional elementary and middle schools, upgrade plumbing, electrical, heating/ventilation systems and renovate/add student bathrooms by using $50,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint an independent Citizens Oversight Committee and perform audits to ensure no bond money is used for teacher or administrative salaries or operating costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10641, "no_votes": 5179, "total_votes": 15820, "percent_yes": 67.26295828065739, "percent_no": 32.73704171934261, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.816891", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.659099", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding, repair and upgrade local schools including health and safety improvements to classrooms and qualify for an estimated $30,000,000 in State grants, shall Moreno Valley Unified School District construct additional elementary and middle schools, upgrade plumbing, electrical, heating/ventilation systems and renovate/add student bathrooms by using $50,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint an independent Citizens Oversight Committee and perform audits to ensure no bond money is used for teacher or administrative salaries or operating costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8580, "fingerprint": "2004|200400662|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400662|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7db49a9849cd5f35", "measure_id": "200400662", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe classroom overcrowding caused by unprecedented population growth, to replace aging portable classrooms and make repairs and renovations to existing schools, shall the Beaumont Unified School District issue bonds not to exceed $54 million at legal rates to build new schools and additional classrooms, to repair roofs and upgrade electrical and plumbing systems as needed, to qualify local schools for state matching funds and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee with annual audits to review all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6934, "no_votes": 6983, "total_votes": 13917, "percent_yes": 49.82395631242365, "percent_no": 50.17604368757635, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.826443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.665484", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe classroom overcrowding caused by unprecedented population growth, to replace aging portable classrooms and make repairs and renovations to existing schools, shall the Beaumont Unified School District issue bonds not to exceed $54 million at legal rates to build new schools and additional classrooms, to repair roofs and upgrade electrical and plumbing systems as needed, to qualify local schools for state matching funds and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee with annual audits to review all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8545, "fingerprint": "2004|200400191|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400191|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f560d3aa48b4e04c", "measure_id": "200400191", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To train local residents for jobs, prepare students for four-year colleges, accommodate increasing student enrollment at College of the Desert by: Expanding nursing/police/fire-fighting training facilities; repairing sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls, plumbing, electrical systems; Upgrading/adding classrooms for computer technology; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; Shall Desert Community College District issue $346,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36489, "no_votes": 16480, "total_votes": 52969, "percent_yes": 68.8874624780532, "percent_no": 31.112537521946805, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.816617", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.658917", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To train local residents for jobs, prepare students for four-year colleges, accommodate increasing student enrollment at College of the Desert by: Expanding nursing/police/fire-fighting training facilities; repairing sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls, plumbing, electrical systems; Upgrading/adding classrooms for computer technology; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; Shall Desert Community College District issue $346,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8568, "fingerprint": "2004|200400493|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400493|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "6381e10afc801073", "measure_id": "200400493", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended by amending the Preamble to better reflect the diversity and inclusiveness of Riverside, changing the title of Article II, and correcting typographical errors in sections 1110 and 1111?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43035, "no_votes": 25947, "total_votes": 68982, "percent_yes": 62.38583978429156, "percent_no": 37.61416021570844, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.823078", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.663206", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended by amending the Preamble to better reflect the diversity and inclusiveness of Riverside, changing the title of Article II, and correcting typographical errors in sections 1110 and 1111?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8548, "fingerprint": "2004|200400194|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400194|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "62014a08bd564e12", "measure_id": "200400194", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local student access to job training and four-year college preparation classes, improve campus safety, add and upgrade science, health, technology academic classrooms/laboratories; expand public safety, police, firefighting, paramedics and healthcare training facilities; repair, acquire, construct, equip buildings, sites, classrooms; shall Riverside Community College District issue $350,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with no proceeds going to the State, all funds remaining locally, independent citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61923, "no_votes": 40282, "total_votes": 102205, "percent_yes": 60.58705542781664, "percent_no": 39.41294457218336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.817426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.659463", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local student access to job training and four-year college preparation classes, improve campus safety, add and upgrade science, health, technology academic classrooms/laboratories; expand public safety, police, firefighting, paramedics and healthcare training facilities; repair, acquire, construct, equip buildings, sites, classrooms; shall Riverside Community College District issue $350,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with no proceeds going to the State, all funds remaining locally, independent citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8569, "fingerprint": "2004|200400494|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400494|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "5f3b79b88ef76577", "measure_id": "200400494", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to (1) add a new Section 201, entitled \"Access to public meetings and public records;\" (2) provide that meetings of ad hoc Council committees and Mayoral-appointed bodies be open to the public; (3) all closed session meetings of the City Council be audio recorded; and (4) provide that the City Clerk shall help members of the public examine and copy all public records?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54402, "no_votes": 15323, "total_votes": 69725, "percent_yes": 78.02366439584081, "percent_no": 21.97633560415919, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.823346", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.663387", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to (1) add a new Section 201, entitled \"Access to public meetings and public records;\" (2) provide that meetings of ad hoc Council committees and Mayoral-appointed bodies be open to the public; (3) all closed session meetings of the City Council be audio recorded; and (4) provide that the City Clerk shall help members of the public examine and copy all public records?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8547, "fingerprint": "2004|200400193|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400193|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8376b85429640784", "measure_id": "200400193", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure the health and safety of students, to repair or replace old and inadequate roofs, electrical, heating and air conditioning systems, to improve technology, and to reduce overcrowding by building a new high school, shall the Perris Union High School District issue $38 million in bonds, with all funds spent in local community schools and qualify the district for State matching funds and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee with annual audits to review expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9214, "no_votes": 8008, "total_votes": 17222, "percent_yes": 53.50133550110324, "percent_no": 46.49866449889676, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.817158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.659282", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure the health and safety of students, to repair or replace old and inadequate roofs, electrical, heating and air conditioning systems, to improve technology, and to reduce overcrowding by building a new high school, shall the Perris Union High School District issue $38 million in bonds, with all funds spent in local community schools and qualify the district for State matching funds and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee with annual audits to review expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8570, "fingerprint": "2004|200400495|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400495|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3dcc7ced736e3c0b", "measure_id": "200400495", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended by adding a new Section 202, entitled \"Adoption of Ethics Code,\" which would require the City of Riverside to adopt within six months a Code of Ethics and Conduct?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50661, "no_votes": 18641, "total_votes": 69302, "percent_yes": 73.10178638423133, "percent_no": 26.898213615768668, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.823658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.663568", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended by adding a new Section 202, entitled \"Adoption of Ethics Code,\" which would require the City of Riverside to adopt within six months a Code of Ethics and Conduct?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8543, "fingerprint": "2004|200400096|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400096|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "90a96faa2f9ab7f0", "measure_id": "200400096", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the annexation of the Redhawk Annexation Area to the city of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District, along with the concurrent detachment from County Service Areas 143 and 152 and the Riverside County Waste Resources District, pursuant to Riverside County LAFCO Application No. 2003-26-3 be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1560, "no_votes": 102, "total_votes": 1662, "percent_yes": 93.86281588447652, "percent_no": 6.137184115523482, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.815992", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.658552", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the annexation of the Redhawk Annexation Area to the city of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District, along with the concurrent detachment from County Service Areas 143 and 152 and the Riverside County Waste Resources District, pursuant to Riverside County LAFCO Application No. 2003-26-3 be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8571, "fingerprint": "2004|200400496|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400496|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "766c274a8effd49b", "measure_id": "200400496", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to (1) provide that the City Council review the compensation of the Mayor and City Council every two years and that any increase be limited to five percent every two years; and (2) eliminate the Mayor and council members salary commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49634, "no_votes": 19435, "total_votes": 69069, "percent_yes": 71.86147186147186, "percent_no": 28.138528138528144, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.823965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.663749", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to (1) provide that the City Council review the compensation of the Mayor and City Council every two years and that any increase be limited to five percent every two years; and (2) eliminate the Mayor and council members salary commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8544, "fingerprint": "2004|200400097|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400097|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4d8a1cd038b39a13", "measure_id": "200400097", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 03-12 of the City of Temecula be adopted replacing existing County Service Area 143 and 152 tax levied against parcels within the Redhawk Annexation Area with the City's special tax which shall only be used for parks, recreation facilities, recreation and community services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals as part of the annexation of the Redhawk Annexation Area to the City of Temecula?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1543, "no_votes": 114, "total_votes": 1657, "percent_yes": 93.12009656004828, "percent_no": 6.879903439951718, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.816264", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.658736", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 03-12 of the City of Temecula be adopted replacing existing County Service Area 143 and 152 tax levied against parcels within the Redhawk Annexation Area with the City's special tax which shall only be used for parks, recreation facilities, recreation and community services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals as part of the annexation of the Redhawk Annexation Area to the City of Temecula?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8572, "fingerprint": "2004|200400497|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400497|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3df59340d3b55641", "measure_id": "200400497", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that the Mayor shall appoint the chairperson to all City Council standing committees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28934, "no_votes": 39154, "total_votes": 68088, "percent_yes": 42.49500646222535, "percent_no": 57.50499353777465, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.824240", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.663933", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that the Mayor shall appoint the chairperson to all City Council standing committees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8541, "fingerprint": "2004|200400026|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400026|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b4fad6606cd5c2ba", "measure_id": "200400026", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution CSD 03-21 of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District be adopted replacing existing County Service Area No. 143 and 152 assessments and charges levied against parcels within the Redhawk Annexation Area with rates and charges which shall only be used for residential  street lighting as part of the annexation of the Redhawk Annexation Area to the Temecula Community Services District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1530, "no_votes": 122, "total_votes": 1652, "percent_yes": 92.61501210653752, "percent_no": 7.38498789346248, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.815380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.658185", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution CSD 03-21 of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District be adopted replacing existing County Service Area No. 143 and 152 assessments and charges levied against parcels within the Redhawk Annexation Area with rates and charges which shall only be used for residential  street lighting as part of the annexation of the Redhawk Annexation Area to the Temecula Community Services District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8573, "fingerprint": "2004|200400498|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400498|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cdffea7c1e788c38", "measure_id": "200400498", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that each City board or commission shall have at least one member from each Council Ward?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43559, "no_votes": 24164, "total_votes": 67723, "percent_yes": 64.31935974484297, "percent_no": 35.68064025515703, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.824505", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.664113", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that each City board or commission shall have at least one member from each Council Ward?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8542, "fingerprint": "2004|200400095|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400095|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ed21a685b957a3c5", "measure_id": "200400095", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1309 adopted to authorize the levy of a special tax on each eligible parcel in the City to fund police protection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3053, "no_votes": 3615, "total_votes": 6668, "percent_yes": 45.78584283143371, "percent_no": 54.21415716856629, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.815716", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.658368", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1309 adopted to authorize the levy of a special tax on each eligible parcel in the City to fund police protection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8574, "fingerprint": "2004|200400499|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400499|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "942eac89f032886a", "measure_id": "200400499", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that minors may be appointed to City boards or commissions with preferential voting privileges only or to a youth commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26595, "no_votes": 41805, "total_votes": 68400, "percent_yes": 38.881578947368425, "percent_no": 61.118421052631575, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.824771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.664295", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that minors may be appointed to City boards or commissions with preferential voting privileges only or to a youth commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8549, "fingerprint": "2004|200400251|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400251|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "bf77fe4d982c2b8c", "measure_id": "200400251", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Rancho Mirage be amended to provide that after the April 13, 2004, Regular General Municipal Election, Council Districts will be eliminated and each member of the City Council shall be elected without regard to district residency?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1353, "no_votes": 551, "total_votes": 1904, "percent_yes": 71.06092436974791, "percent_no": 28.93907563025209, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.817730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.659646", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Rancho Mirage be amended to provide that after the April 13, 2004, Regular General Municipal Election, Council Districts will be eliminated and each member of the City Council shall be elected without regard to district residency?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8575, "fingerprint": "2004|200400500|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400500|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "bf5b46c049accaa1", "measure_id": "200400500", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to add a new section 810, which would add the Community Police Review Commission to the Charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40756, "no_votes": 27440, "total_votes": 68196, "percent_yes": 59.763035955188, "percent_no": 40.236964044812, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.825038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.664479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to add a new section 810, which would add the Community Police Review Commission to the Charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8550, "fingerprint": "2004|200400252|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400252|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "99e36ae375f6ba27", "measure_id": "200400252", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the city council at its second regular meeting in April in non-election years and at the meeting in which new council members are installed during election years to appoint a council member to serve as mayor for a one year period on a rotating basis that affords each member of the city council with an equal opportunity to serve as mayor to the extent reasonably possible under such guidelines as the city council shall establish by ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1518, "no_votes": 373, "total_votes": 1891, "percent_yes": 80.27498677948176, "percent_no": 19.725013220518235, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.818032", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.659831", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to require the city council at its second regular meeting in April in non-election years and at the meeting in which new council members are installed during election years to appoint a council member to serve as mayor for a one year period on a rotating basis that affords each member of the city council with an equal opportunity to serve as mayor to the extent reasonably possible under such guidelines as the city council shall establish by ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8576, "fingerprint": "2004|200400501|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400501|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3b8618658433a83c", "measure_id": "200400501", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to allow the City Council (1) to conduct an election for a bonded indebtedness by a mail-ballot election; and (2) to sell such bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness at public sale by notice inviting bids or by negotiated private sale?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27803, "no_votes": 38646, "total_votes": 66449, "percent_yes": 41.84111122815994, "percent_no": 58.15888877184006, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.825303", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.664733", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to allow the City Council (1) to conduct an election for a bonded indebtedness by a mail-ballot election; and (2) to sell such bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness at public sale by notice inviting bids or by negotiated private sale?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8551, "fingerprint": "2004|200400253|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400253|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "fe4b12fe7a1258a8", "measure_id": "200400253", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If [the above measure] is approved, shall the Charter be amended to also require that after the city council appoints the mayor, it shall appoint a council member who, to the greatest extent possible, is the person who appears most likely to meet the eligibility requirements to succeed the current mayor the following year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1503, "no_votes": 391, "total_votes": 1894, "percent_yes": 79.3558606124604, "percent_no": 20.644139387539596, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-04-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.818300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.660012", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If [the above measure] is approved, shall the Charter be amended to also require that after the city council appoints the mayor, it shall appoint a council member who, to the greatest extent possible, is the person who appears most likely to meet the eligibility requirements to succeed the current mayor the following year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8577, "fingerprint": "2004|200400502|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400502|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c61cd1527d525285", "measure_id": "200400502", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to (1) provide that bids on public works contracts can be accompanied by such other form of bidder's security as the City Council establishes by ordinance; and (2) add a new Section 1114, entitled \"Use of design-build procurement for public works projects,\" which would permit the award of contracts for the combined design and construction of public works projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37815, "no_votes": 28297, "total_votes": 66112, "percent_yes": 57.19839060987415, "percent_no": 42.80160939012585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.825567", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.664940", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to (1) provide that bids on public works contracts can be accompanied by such other form of bidder's security as the City Council establishes by ordinance; and (2) add a new Section 1114, entitled \"Use of design-build procurement for public works projects,\" which would permit the award of contracts for the combined design and construction of public works projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8552, "fingerprint": "2004|200400276|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400276|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "582eefdf818f44bd", "measure_id": "200400276", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Riverside be authorized to establish a Special Tax of $50.00 per parcel, per year on all parcels within CSA 38 (Pine Cove) to finance the extended service of voluntary firefighters and enhanced ambulance service? This Special Tax will be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase, if any in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (\"CPI-U\") for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (\"Index\") published by the Bureau of Land Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 213, "no_votes": 66, "total_votes": 279, "percent_yes": 76.34408602150538, "percent_no": 23.655913978494624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-31", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.818573", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.660192", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Riverside be authorized to establish a Special Tax of $50.00 per parcel, per year on all parcels within CSA 38 (Pine Cove) to finance the extended service of voluntary firefighters and enhanced ambulance service? This Special Tax will be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase, if any in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (\"CPI-U\") for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (\"Index\") published by the Bureau of Land Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8578, "fingerprint": "2004|200400503|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400503|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2dffd9ea5f5c5dff", "measure_id": "200400503", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that the City change its independent auditor at least every five years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47116, "no_votes": 20634, "total_votes": 67750, "percent_yes": 69.5439114391144, "percent_no": 30.456088560885604, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.825896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.665121", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that the City change its independent auditor at least every five years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8562, "fingerprint": "2004|200400487|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400487|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a463e4bdb7ec6824", "measure_id": "200400487", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure entitled: \"An Initiative Ordinance of the City of Moreno Valley Prohibiting the City from Imposing a Utility User's Tax and Repealing the Existing 6% Utility User's Tax\" be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16693, "no_votes": 21627, "total_votes": 38320, "percent_yes": 43.56210855949896, "percent_no": 56.43789144050104, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.821298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.662104", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure entitled: \"An Initiative Ordinance of the City of Moreno Valley Prohibiting the City from Imposing a Utility User's Tax and Repealing the Existing 6% Utility User's Tax\" be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8579, "fingerprint": "2004|200400504|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400504|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cb2df722532a3907", "measure_id": "200400504", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to (1) allow the board of public utilities to award and execute contracts for construction, goods or services for the public utility; (2) allow the director of public utilities to approve work to be done at the customers' request and expense; and (3) allow the director of public utilities to negotiate and execute contracts with individual retail customers for utility services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34120, "no_votes": 32475, "total_votes": 66595, "percent_yes": 51.23507770853668, "percent_no": 48.76492229146332, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.826162", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.665301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to (1) allow the board of public utilities to award and execute contracts for construction, goods or services for the public utility; (2) allow the director of public utilities to approve work to be done at the customers' request and expense; and (3) allow the director of public utilities to negotiate and execute contracts with individual retail customers for utility services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8563, "fingerprint": "2004|200400488|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400488|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b63ef5f777508c3b", "measure_id": "200400488", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure of the City of Moreno Valley regulating management of the City's municipal electric utility including prohibiting use of city general funds for its support; mandating levels of financial reserves; prohibiting use of electric utility reserves for any purpose other than the electric utility; establishing load resource requirements; establishing limits on electric rates; requiring uniform electric rates for all customers in a rate group; and requiring utility work be done by qualified employees paid at prevailing wage be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19047, "no_votes": 19375, "total_votes": 38422, "percent_yes": 49.5731612097236, "percent_no": 50.4268387902764, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.821566", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.662289", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure of the City of Moreno Valley regulating management of the City's municipal electric utility including prohibiting use of city general funds for its support; mandating levels of financial reserves; prohibiting use of electric utility reserves for any purpose other than the electric utility; establishing load resource requirements; establishing limits on electric rates; requiring uniform electric rates for all customers in a rate group; and requiring utility work be done by qualified employees paid at prevailing wage be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8567, "fingerprint": "2004|200400492|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400492|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c3f8363b9f16d2bd", "measure_id": "200400492", "measure_letter": "NN", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 1141 enacting a special parcel tax to fund additional police and fire protection services in the City of Perris be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4617, "no_votes": 2748, "total_votes": 7365, "percent_yes": 62.68839103869654, "percent_no": 37.31160896130346, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.822806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.663022", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 1141 enacting a special parcel tax to fund additional police and fire protection services in the City of Perris be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8564, "fingerprint": "2004|200400489|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400489|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "fcb248fbde46cb74", "measure_id": "200400489", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the residents of the City of Palm Desert ratify an ordinance passed by the City Council in 1992 (Ordinance No. 679), which increased the Transient Occupancy Tax (the hotel bed tax) from eight percent (8%) to nine percent (9%) and which current law now says requires voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12345, "no_votes": 5584, "total_votes": 17929, "percent_yes": 68.8549277706509, "percent_no": 31.145072229349097, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.821936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.662475", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the residents of the City of Palm Desert ratify an ordinance passed by the City Council in 1992 (Ordinance No. 679), which increased the Transient Occupancy Tax (the hotel bed tax) from eight percent (8%) to nine percent (9%) and which current law now says requires voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8559, "fingerprint": "2004|200400484|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400484|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a7b63bad8123530e", "measure_id": "200400484", "measure_letter": "OO", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the transient occupancy tax of the City of Indio be raised from ten percent to twelve percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3877, "no_votes": 6999, "total_votes": 10876, "percent_yes": 35.64729680029422, "percent_no": 64.35270319970579, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.820509", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.661551", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the transient occupancy tax of the City of Indio be raised from ten percent to twelve percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8560, "fingerprint": "2004|200400485|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400485|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d7e14c362709cd35", "measure_id": "200400485", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk cease to be elective and become appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4840, "no_votes": 5755, "total_votes": 10595, "percent_yes": 45.68192543652666, "percent_no": 54.31807456347334, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.820773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.661735", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk cease to be elective and become appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8558, "fingerprint": "2004|200400483|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400483|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1492f93877742f63", "measure_id": "200400483", "measure_letter": "PP", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance of the people of Hemet redesignating 43.56 acres of vacant land now classified for commercial, manufacturing and industrial uses to land restricted to development for residential uses with a minimum lot size of 6000 square feet be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5499, "no_votes": 16784, "total_votes": 22283, "percent_yes": 24.67800565453484, "percent_no": 75.32199434546516, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.820242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.661363", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall an initiative ordinance of the people of Hemet redesignating 43.56 acres of vacant land now classified for commercial, manufacturing and industrial uses to land restricted to development for residential uses with a minimum lot size of 6000 square feet be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8561, "fingerprint": "2004|200400486|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400486|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "61135c2b082dc8fc", "measure_id": "200400486", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer cease to be elective and become appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4607, "no_votes": 6016, "total_votes": 10623, "percent_yes": 43.36816341899652, "percent_no": 56.63183658100348, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.821035", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.661917", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer cease to be elective and become appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8553, "fingerprint": "2004|200400478|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400478|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1802087128ddabda", "measure_id": "200400478", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City's transient occupancy tax rate be increased from ten percent to eleven percent on January 1, 2005, from eleven percent to eleven and one-half percent on January 1, 2006 and then from eleven and one-half percent to twelve percent on January 1, 2007?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6094, "no_votes": 5514, "total_votes": 11608, "percent_yes": 52.49827705031013, "percent_no": 47.50172294968987, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.818841", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.660374", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's transient occupancy tax rate be increased from ten percent to eleven percent on January 1, 2005, from eleven percent to eleven and one-half percent on January 1, 2006 and then from eleven and one-half percent to twelve percent on January 1, 2007?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8554, "fingerprint": "2004|200400479|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400479|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "0b5c4311d2ab60ec", "measure_id": "200400479", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City Council consider creating a Cathedral City Tourism Commission of professionals of the local hospitality industry and setting aside an amount in the general fund equivalent to fifty percent of any increase of the transient occupancy tax rate approved by the voters on November 2, 2004 for purposes of tourism marketing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4784, "no_votes": 6378, "total_votes": 11162, "percent_yes": 42.85970256226483, "percent_no": 57.14029743773517, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.819107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.660556", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City Council consider creating a Cathedral City Tourism Commission of professionals of the local hospitality industry and setting aside an amount in the general fund equivalent to fifty percent of any increase of the transient occupancy tax rate approved by the voters on November 2, 2004 for purposes of tourism marketing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8581, "fingerprint": "2004|200400663|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400663|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "0f4b1db3faab4444", "measure_id": "200400663", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and repair schools in the District, relieve student overcrowding by building and acquiring new schools and classrooms, and become eligible for State matching funds, shall the Palm Springs Unified School District issue $122,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits provided spending is annually reviewed and audited by an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and no money is transferred to the State of California?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32476, "no_votes": 12186, "total_votes": 44662, "percent_yes": 72.71505978236532, "percent_no": 27.284940217634684, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.826714", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.665670", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and repair schools in the District, relieve student overcrowding by building and acquiring new schools and classrooms, and become eligible for State matching funds, shall the Palm Springs Unified School District issue $122,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits provided spending is annually reviewed and audited by an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and no money is transferred to the State of California?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8565, "fingerprint": "2004|200400490|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400490|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d8c5166d49535d2a", "measure_id": "200400490", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution 20866 approving amendments to the General Plan Use and Circulation Plan for Section 14 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8310, "no_votes": 8212, "total_votes": 16522, "percent_yes": 50.29657426461688, "percent_no": 49.70342573538312, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.822236", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.662657", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution 20866 approving amendments to the General Plan Use and Circulation Plan for Section 14 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8566, "fingerprint": "2004|200400491|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400491|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "28abf7e5fa230584", "measure_id": "200400491", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to permit the Council to increase the existing utility users tax by up to three percent for a period of no more than three years, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4294, "no_votes": 12687, "total_votes": 16981, "percent_yes": 25.28708556622107, "percent_no": 74.71291443377893, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.822498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.662839", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to permit the Council to increase the existing utility users tax by up to three percent for a period of no more than three years, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8555, "fingerprint": "2004|200400480|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400480|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "bc57ce4644bcb2f5", "measure_id": "200400480", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors of the City of Coachella elect a mayor and four councilmen?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2267, "no_votes": 722, "total_votes": 2989, "percent_yes": 75.84476413516225, "percent_no": 24.15523586483775, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.819409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.660738", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors of the City of Coachella elect a mayor and four councilmen?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8556, "fingerprint": "2004|200400481|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400481|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "64022f260e9161c6", "measure_id": "200400481", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a mayor elected by the electors of the City of Coachella serve a term of two (2) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2090, "no_votes": 878, "total_votes": 2968, "percent_yes": 70.4177897574124, "percent_no": 29.582210242587607, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.819712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.660917", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a mayor elected by the electors of the City of Coachella serve a term of two (2) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8557, "fingerprint": "2004|200400482|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400482|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e286057276c9ba2d", "measure_id": "200400482", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a mayor elected by the electors of the City of Coachella serve a term of four (4) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 986, "no_votes": 1966, "total_votes": 2952, "percent_yes": 33.40108401084011, "percent_no": 66.59891598915989, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.819977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.661098", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a mayor elected by the electors of the City of Coachella serve a term of four (4) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8582, "fingerprint": "2004|200400664|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400664|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "994b40f4742a694c", "measure_id": "200400664", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure the health and safety of students, repair or replace old inadequate roofs, electrical, heating/air conditioning systems, improve technology, and reduce overcrowding by building a new high school and purchasing a Menifee area school site, shall the Perris Union High School District issue $46,000,000 in bonds, with all funds spent in local community schools and qualify the District for State matching funds and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee with annual audits to review expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18871, "no_votes": 13723, "total_votes": 32594, "percent_yes": 57.8971589863165, "percent_no": 42.1028410136835, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.826994", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.665850", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure the health and safety of students, repair or replace old inadequate roofs, electrical, heating/air conditioning systems, improve technology, and reduce overcrowding by building a new high school and purchasing a Menifee area school site, shall the Perris Union High School District issue $46,000,000 in bonds, with all funds spent in local community schools and qualify the District for State matching funds and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee with annual audits to review expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8586, "fingerprint": "2004|200400268|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400268|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "bed10611db50a370", "measure_id": "200400268", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Pam Pratt be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 174, "no_votes": 162, "total_votes": 336, "percent_yes": 51.78571428571429, "percent_no": 48.21428571428571, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-07-27", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.828189", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.666597", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Pam Pratt be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8587, "fingerprint": "2004|200400315|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400315|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "9a9c4f058a1fc263", "measure_id": "200400315", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To relieve traffic congestion, improve safety, and match state/federal funds by: Improving I-5, I-80, US 50, SR 99; Constructing a new road connecting I-5/SR 99/US 50; Maintaining/improving local roads; Increasing transit for seniors and disabled persons; Expanding/planning for light rail and commuter rail; Shall Sacramento County voters continue the existing half-cent transportation sales tax for thirty years, including creating an Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee to conduct audits ensuring all voter mandates are met?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 331255, "no_votes": 108742, "total_votes": 439997, "percent_yes": 75.28574058459489, "percent_no": 24.71425941540511, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.828455", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.666780", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve traffic congestion, improve safety, and match state/federal funds by: Improving I-5, I-80, US 50, SR 99; Constructing a new road connecting I-5/SR 99/US 50; Maintaining/improving local roads; Increasing transit for seniors and disabled persons; Expanding/planning for light rail and commuter rail; Shall Sacramento County voters continue the existing half-cent transportation sales tax for thirty years, including creating an Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee to conduct audits ensuring all voter mandates are met?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8585, "fingerprint": "2004|200400197|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400197|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "f000ba63f11d54df", "measure_id": "200400197", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Sierra College Campuses in Rocklin, Nevada County, Roseville, Lincoln, Truckee by: Fixing faulty sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls; Expanding nursing/police/firefighting centers; Upgrading classroom wiring; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall Sierra Joint Community College District issue $394,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3311, "no_votes": 3498, "total_votes": 6809, "percent_yes": 48.62681744749596, "percent_no": 51.37318255250404, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.827921", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.666405", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, improve safety, accommodate increasing enrollment at Sierra College Campuses in Rocklin, Nevada County, Roseville, Lincoln, Truckee by: Fixing faulty sewer systems, leaky roofs, decaying walls; Expanding nursing/police/firefighting centers; Upgrading classroom wiring; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall Sierra Joint Community College District issue $394,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8583, "fingerprint": "2004|200400195|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400195|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "3fb01c32f596e89f", "measure_id": "200400195", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "The \"Facilities Master Plan\" defines the need for a new high school, improvements to Galt High School, and a new complex to house continuation/adult education/administration offices relieving overcrowding at Galt High. Shall the Galt Joint Union High School District construct new facilities to deal with ongoing continued growth in the District by issuing $16,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing annual audits and establishing a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3110, "no_votes": 3266, "total_votes": 6376, "percent_yes": 48.77666248431618, "percent_no": 51.22333751568382, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.827343", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.666035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The \"Facilities Master Plan\" defines the need for a new high school, improvements to Galt High School, and a new complex to house continuation/adult education/administration offices relieving overcrowding at Galt High. Shall the Galt Joint Union High School District construct new facilities to deal with ongoing continued growth in the District by issuing $16,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing annual audits and establishing a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8595, "fingerprint": "2004|200400667|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400667|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "7e97dd2bce88daca", "measure_id": "200400667", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve school overcrowding, enhance student safety, upgrade technology to remain current, bring old classroom buildings and school facilities up to standards of new schools, construct additional classrooms at existing campuses, acquire/improve property, equip and construct one new high school, shall the Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $79 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee and perform annual audits, with no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5033, "no_votes": 1075, "total_votes": 6108, "percent_yes": 82.40013097576949, "percent_no": 17.599869024230514, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.830888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.668246", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve school overcrowding, enhance student safety, upgrade technology to remain current, bring old classroom buildings and school facilities up to standards of new schools, construct additional classrooms at existing campuses, acquire/improve property, equip and construct one new high school, shall the Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $79 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee and perform annual audits, with no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8588, "fingerprint": "2004|200400316|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400316|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "c3214d6371c427bf", "measure_id": "200400316", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Do the qualified electors of the County of Sacramento approve the development, construction, or acquistion of affordable housing within the following jurisdictions for households such as seniors, working families, and the disabled, referred in statute as low rent housing, not to exceed: 3,000 dwelling units in the City of Sacramento, 500 dwelling units in each of the Cities of Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Folsom, Galt, and Rancho Cordova; and 4,000 dwelling units in the County unincorporated area over the next 20 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 231926, "no_votes": 183368, "total_votes": 415294, "percent_yes": 55.84621978646452, "percent_no": 44.15378021353548, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.828893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.666965", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do the qualified electors of the County of Sacramento approve the development, construction, or acquistion of affordable housing within the following jurisdictions for households such as seniors, working families, and the disabled, referred in statute as low rent housing, not to exceed: 3,000 dwelling units in the City of Sacramento, 500 dwelling units in each of the Cities of Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Folsom, Galt, and Rancho Cordova; and 4,000 dwelling units in the County unincorporated area over the next 20 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8584, "fingerprint": "2004|200400196|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400196|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "2c6ccc6d0e775552", "measure_id": "200400196", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/transfer to four year colleges, repair buildings, improve safety, accommodate growing enrollment by repairing leaky roofs, decaying walls, electrical wiring; improving fire safety; removing asbestos; expanding/establishing Stockton, Manteca, Tracy, Lodi/Galt, Foothill Area campuses/education centers; upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District  issue $250,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3009, "no_votes": 3669, "total_votes": 6678, "percent_yes": 45.05840071877808, "percent_no": 54.94159928122192, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.827650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.666219", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/transfer to four year colleges, repair buildings, improve safety, accommodate growing enrollment by repairing leaky roofs, decaying walls, electrical wiring; improving fire safety; removing asbestos; expanding/establishing Stockton, Manteca, Tracy, Lodi/Galt, Foothill Area campuses/education centers; upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District  issue $250,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8591, "fingerprint": "2004|200400507|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400507|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "ef3591087ff7caf5", "measure_id": "200400507", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Rancho Cordova's base-year appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 be established at  $36,010,121?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11177, "no_votes": 3530, "total_votes": 14707, "percent_yes": 75.99782416536344, "percent_no": 24.00217583463656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.829730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.667516", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Rancho Cordova's base-year appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 be established at  $36,010,121?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8590, "fingerprint": "2004|200400506|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400506|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "89383ee3d9481485", "measure_id": "200400506", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2004-05, which would enact a one quarter cent transactions and use tax for general government purposes, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1248, "no_votes": 4764, "total_votes": 6012, "percent_yes": 20.75848303393213, "percent_no": 79.24151696606788, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.829427", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.667336", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2004-05, which would enact a one quarter cent transactions and use tax for general government purposes, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8593, "fingerprint": "2004|200400665|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400665|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "4353dc82b6215986", "measure_id": "200400665", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education in Isleton and Rio Vista, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of River Delta Unified School District construct, upgrade, and improve classrooms and school facilities, renovate restrooms and plumbing, upgrade electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, replace heating and air conditioning systems, make health and safety improvements, and qualify for State grants by issuing 14,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee an NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 727, "no_votes": 273, "total_votes": 1000, "percent_yes": 72.7, "percent_no": 27.299999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.830339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.667878", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education in Isleton and Rio Vista, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of River Delta Unified School District construct, upgrade, and improve classrooms and school facilities, renovate restrooms and plumbing, upgrade electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, replace heating and air conditioning systems, make health and safety improvements, and qualify for State grants by issuing 14,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee an NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8594, "fingerprint": "2004|200400666|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400666|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "4f57bce9099cdfc4", "measure_id": "200400666", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education in Walnut Grove, Courtland, and Clarksburg, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of River Delta Unified School District construct, upgrade, and improve classrooms and school facilities, upgrade electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, renovate restrooms and plumbing, replace heating and air conditioning, make health and safety improvements, and qualify for State grants by issuing $9,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 722, "no_votes": 199, "total_votes": 921, "percent_yes": 78.39305103148752, "percent_no": 21.606948968512484, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.830611", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.668058", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education in Walnut Grove, Courtland, and Clarksburg, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of River Delta Unified School District construct, upgrade, and improve classrooms and school facilities, upgrade electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, renovate restrooms and plumbing, replace heating and air conditioning, make health and safety improvements, and qualify for State grants by issuing $9,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8589, "fingerprint": "2004|200400505|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400505|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "f7f210d7c1dd7718", "measure_id": "200400505", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to add Section 7.08, \"Local Control of Land South of Highway 50\", providing before annexation of property south of Highway 50, the City Council shall identify a water supply at no cost to existing residents, adopt plans mitigating traffic impacts, preserving 30% of the property as open space, and providing for schools; and adopt a development plan only after environmental review and mailed notice to all voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17076, "no_votes": 8118, "total_votes": 25194, "percent_yes": 67.77804239104549, "percent_no": 32.22195760895451, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.829161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.667148", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to add Section 7.08, \"Local Control of Land South of Highway 50\", providing before annexation of property south of Highway 50, the City Council shall identify a water supply at no cost to existing residents, adopt plans mitigating traffic impacts, preserving 30% of the property as open space, and providing for schools; and adopt a development plan only after environmental review and mailed notice to all voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8592, "fingerprint": "2004|200400508|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400508|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "4447eb5f38b507cb", "measure_id": "200400508", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain children's programs, homework centers, increased hours, new book funding, and technology in branch libraries, shall an equivalent parcel tax replace the existing assessment in 2007-2008 (single family residences $26.60/year; other properties at proportional amounts) for 10 years, with adjustments not exceeding 3% annually or $8.00 total for single family residences during the life of the tax, and requiring City library funding to be maintained or only reduced proportionally with other non-safety services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91416, "no_votes": 35213, "total_votes": 126629, "percent_yes": 72.19199393503858, "percent_no": 27.80800606496142, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.829997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.667698", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain children's programs, homework centers, increased hours, new book funding, and technology in branch libraries, shall an equivalent parcel tax replace the existing assessment in 2007-2008 (single family residences $26.60/year; other properties at proportional amounts) for 10 years, with adjustments not exceeding 3% annually or $8.00 total for single family residences during the life of the tax, and requiring City library funding to be maintained or only reduced proportionally with other non-safety services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8599, "fingerprint": "2004|200400198|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400198|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "5d5b0be8bfa7ec53", "measure_id": "200400198", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To train and prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities and improve safety by providing: classrooms for healthcare and job training programs; a university and career readiness center; improved math, science, arts, English and other instructional facilities; and by upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $118,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 186, "no_votes": 198, "total_votes": 384, "percent_yes": 48.4375, "percent_no": 51.5625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.832105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.668981", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To train and prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities and improve safety by providing: classrooms for healthcare and job training programs; a university and career readiness center; improved math, science, arts, English and other instructional facilities; and by upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $118,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8600, "fingerprint": "2004|200400199|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400199|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "926c9b3c75dc594b", "measure_id": "200400199", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, accommodate increasing enrollment and upgrade Gavilan College campuses in Gilroy, San Benito County and the Greater Morgan Hill area by: improving fire safety and security; upgrading plumbing/sewer systems; upgrading wiring for computer technology; repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping classrooms, buildings, libraries and sites shall Gavilan Joint Community College District issue $108,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6518, "no_votes": 5125, "total_votes": 11643, "percent_yes": 55.9821351885253, "percent_no": 44.0178648114747, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.832375", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.669165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, accommodate increasing enrollment and upgrade Gavilan College campuses in Gilroy, San Benito County and the Greater Morgan Hill area by: improving fire safety and security; upgrading plumbing/sewer systems; upgrading wiring for computer technology; repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping classrooms, buildings, libraries and sites shall Gavilan Joint Community College District issue $108,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8596, "fingerprint": "2004|200400027|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400027|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "be76a6ab632c555c", "measure_id": "200400027", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Growth Control Ordinance, Ordinance Number 760, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3983, "no_votes": 9004, "total_votes": 12987, "percent_yes": 30.669130669130663, "percent_no": 69.33086933086933, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.831206", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.668431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Growth Control Ordinance, Ordinance Number 760, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8597, "fingerprint": "2004|200400098|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400098|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "53cb804a9acd7e7e", "measure_id": "200400098", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a special City of San Juan Bautista transient tax, which is a tax on the cost of hotel rooms that is paid only by the person renting the room, in the amount of two percent (2%) for the purpose of funding public restroom and parking improvements in the city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 340, "no_votes": 149, "total_votes": 489, "percent_yes": 69.52965235173824, "percent_no": 30.470347648261765, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.831503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.668614", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a special City of San Juan Bautista transient tax, which is a tax on the cost of hotel rooms that is paid only by the person renting the room, in the amount of two percent (2%) for the purpose of funding public restroom and parking improvements in the city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8598, "fingerprint": "2004|200400099|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400099|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "0eecd7055829dba6", "measure_id": "200400099", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved that adopts a special transactions and use tax to pay for police and fire protection services and capital infrastructure projects at the rate of three-quarters of one percent (.75%) of the retail sale price, to be administered by the California State Board of Equalization?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 302, "no_votes": 181, "total_votes": 483, "percent_yes": 62.52587991718427, "percent_no": 37.47412008281573, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.831773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.668798", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved that adopts a special transactions and use tax to pay for police and fire protection services and capital infrastructure projects at the rate of three-quarters of one percent (.75%) of the retail sale price, to be administered by the California State Board of Equalization?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8601, "fingerprint": "2004|200400509|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400509|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200400509", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4887, "no_votes": 4368, "total_votes": 9255, "percent_yes": 52.803889789303085, "percent_no": 47.196110210696915, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.832641", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.669350", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8602, "fingerprint": "2004|200400510|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400510|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "37e1d945659eaed8", "measure_id": "200400510", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved that adopts a transaction and use tax to pay for general municipal purposes at the rate of three-quarters of one percent (.75%) of the retail sales price, to be administered by the California State Board of Equalization?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 344, "no_votes": 296, "total_votes": 640, "percent_yes": 53.75, "percent_no": 46.25, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.832975", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.669535", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved that adopts a transaction and use tax to pay for general municipal purposes at the rate of three-quarters of one percent (.75%) of the retail sales price, to be administered by the California State Board of Equalization?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8603, "fingerprint": "2004|200400001|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400001|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "451b0d0aa6add2c9", "measure_id": "200400001", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Steve Graves be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2620, "no_votes": 1453, "total_votes": 4073, "percent_yes": 64.32604959489319, "percent_no": 35.67395040510681, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-01-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.833252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.669718", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Steve Graves be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8604, "fingerprint": "2004|200400002|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400002|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d54e25c69699f78d", "measure_id": "200400002", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Brad Sundquist be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2566, "no_votes": 1494, "total_votes": 4060, "percent_yes": 63.20197044334975, "percent_no": 36.79802955665025, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-01-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.833552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.669899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Brad Sundquist be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8605, "fingerprint": "2004|200400003|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400003|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "7e920375b68d4fc5", "measure_id": "200400003", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ray Rucker be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2532, "no_votes": 1531, "total_votes": 4063, "percent_yes": 62.318483878907216, "percent_no": 37.681516121092784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-01-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.833819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.670078", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ray Rucker be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8619, "fingerprint": "2004|200400668|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400668|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "7db49a9849cd5f35", "measure_id": "200400668", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe classroom overcrowding caused by unprecedented population growth, to replace aging portable classrooms and make repairs and renovations to existing schools, shall the Beaumont Unified School District issue bonds not to exceed $54 million at legal rates to build new schools and additional classrooms, to repair roofs and upgrade electrical and plumbing systems as needed, to qualify local schools for state matching funds and appoint a citizens oversight committee with annual audits to review all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 1, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.837996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.672672", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe classroom overcrowding caused by unprecedented population growth, to replace aging portable classrooms and make repairs and renovations to existing schools, shall the Beaumont Unified School District issue bonds not to exceed $54 million at legal rates to build new schools and additional classrooms, to repair roofs and upgrade electrical and plumbing systems as needed, to qualify local schools for state matching funds and appoint a citizens oversight committee with annual audits to review all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8620, "fingerprint": "2004|200400669|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400669|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "7b1cb8d474fb4b05", "measure_id": "200400669", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To strengthen local job training programs and increase academic classes for students with 2- and 4-year college goals by adding classrooms and tech labs; renovating unsafe and deteriorating campus buildings' and repairing, acquiring, constructing, furnishing and equipping college facilities, shall the Copper Mountain Community College District issue $19,720,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with accountability safeguards, including an independent citizens oversight committtee and annual audits, with no money used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12455, "no_votes": 4924, "total_votes": 17379, "percent_yes": 71.66695437021693, "percent_no": 28.333045629783072, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.838489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.672853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To strengthen local job training programs and increase academic classes for students with 2- and 4-year college goals by adding classrooms and tech labs; renovating unsafe and deteriorating campus buildings' and repairing, acquiring, constructing, furnishing and equipping college facilities, shall the Copper Mountain Community College District issue $19,720,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with accountability safeguards, including an independent citizens oversight committtee and annual audits, with no money used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8615, "fingerprint": "2004|200400511|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400511|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "e188a93cf0f3cdfb", "measure_id": "200400511", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Adelanto approve a charter amendment to elect the mayor for a 4 year term, to take effect with the general municipal election in 2006?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2214, "no_votes": 1206, "total_votes": 3420, "percent_yes": 64.73684210526316, "percent_no": 35.263157894736835, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.836922", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.671946", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Adelanto approve a charter amendment to elect the mayor for a 4 year term, to take effect with the general municipal election in 2006?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8616, "fingerprint": "2004|200400512|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400512|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "7e6400be0be9f536", "measure_id": "200400512", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Grand Terrace establish the office of elective mayor for a 4 year term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2541, "no_votes": 1821, "total_votes": 4362, "percent_yes": 58.25309491059147, "percent_no": 41.74690508940853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.837192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.672130", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Grand Terrace establish the office of elective mayor for a 4 year term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8617, "fingerprint": "2004|200400513|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400513|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b7307b9a580dee80", "measure_id": "200400513", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to fund the general needs of the community including, but no limited to, construction of a new police facility and senior and youth centers, street and sidewalk repairs, and park development; maintain municipal services; and replace Montclair's ongoing revenue losses to the state, shall ordinance No. 04-849 be approved, providing for a one quarter of 1 percent transcations and use tax that raises for the community 25 cents on each $100 retail purchase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4578, "no_votes": 2580, "total_votes": 7158, "percent_yes": 63.95641240569992, "percent_no": 36.04358759430008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.837459", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.672310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to fund the general needs of the community including, but no limited to, construction of a new police facility and senior and youth centers, street and sidewalk repairs, and park development; maintain municipal services; and replace Montclair's ongoing revenue losses to the state, shall ordinance No. 04-849 be approved, providing for a one quarter of 1 percent transcations and use tax that raises for the community 25 cents on each $100 retail purchase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8618, "fingerprint": "2004|200400514|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400514|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a4cecce22988f33a", "measure_id": "200400514", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a new charter be adopted for the City of San Bernardino?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23214, "no_votes": 14333, "total_votes": 37547, "percent_yes": 61.8265107731643, "percent_no": 38.1734892268357, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.837730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.672490", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a new charter be adopted for the City of San Bernardino?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8614, "fingerprint": "2004|200400317|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400317|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f6f99c99b02a292d", "measure_id": "200400317", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Local Transportation Improvement Program. To relieve traffic congestion, improve safety and match state/federal transportation funds for: Widening/Improving I-10, I-15, I-210, SR-60, SR-62, SR-18, US-395: Improving freeway interchanges countywide; Improving local streets and roads; Expanding transit for seniors and disabled riders; and expanding Metrolink commuter rail; Shall San Bernardino County voters continue the existing half-cent transportation sales tax (SBCTA Ordinance 04-01) for thirty years and create an independent taxpayer oversight committee to insure all voter mandates are met?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 394269, "no_votes": 98409, "total_votes": 492678, "percent_yes": 80.02569629656693, "percent_no": 19.974303703433065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.836573", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.671763", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Local Transportation Improvement Program. To relieve traffic congestion, improve safety and match state/federal transportation funds for: Widening/Improving I-10, I-15, I-210, SR-60, SR-62, SR-18, US-395: Improving freeway interchanges countywide; Improving local streets and roads; Expanding transit for seniors and disabled riders; and expanding Metrolink commuter rail; Shall San Bernardino County voters continue the existing half-cent transportation sales tax (SBCTA Ordinance 04-01) for thirty years and create an independent taxpayer oversight committee to insure all voter mandates are met?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8612, "fingerprint": "2004|200400200|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400200|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4bec83b2fd0b472b", "measure_id": "200400200", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding by building a new elementary school and middle school and adding additional classrooms, upgrade old electrical systems, replace aged and inadequate restrooms, plumbing and septic facilities, remove asbestos to safeguard student health and qualify for state matching funds, shall the Apple Valley Unified School District issue $36 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee, with all proceeds spent locally to benefit neighborhood schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8818, "no_votes": 6233, "total_votes": 15051, "percent_yes": 58.587469271144776, "percent_no": 41.412530728855224, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.835959", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.671367", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding by building a new elementary school and middle school and adding additional classrooms, upgrade old electrical systems, replace aged and inadequate restrooms, plumbing and septic facilities, remove asbestos to safeguard student health and qualify for state matching funds, shall the Apple Valley Unified School District issue $36 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee, with all proceeds spent locally to benefit neighborhood schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8613, "fingerprint": "2004|200400201|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400201|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c9d7c6cf2e67fa0e", "measure_id": "200400201", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "San Bernardino school safety, overcrowding/repair measure. To improve student safety, repair local schools and relieve overcrowding by: installing/reparing fire safety equipment; fixing leaky roofs/decaying walls; removing asbestos; upgrading bathrooms, plumbing, sewers/electrical wiring for computer technology; building new schools; imporving disabled access; reparing, expanding, constructing, acquiring/equipping classrooms, labs, sites, libraries shall San Bernardino City Unified School District issue $140,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens oversight, and no money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14282, "no_votes": 8965, "total_votes": 23247, "percent_yes": 61.43588420011184, "percent_no": 38.56411579988816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.836303", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.671551", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Bernardino school safety, overcrowding/repair measure. To improve student safety, repair local schools and relieve overcrowding by: installing/reparing fire safety equipment; fixing leaky roofs/decaying walls; removing asbestos; upgrading bathrooms, plumbing, sewers/electrical wiring for computer technology; building new schools; imporving disabled access; reparing, expanding, constructing, acquiring/equipping classrooms, labs, sites, libraries shall San Bernardino City Unified School District issue $140,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens oversight, and no money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8607, "fingerprint": "2004|200400100|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400100|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2f35570f5c3b04e6", "measure_id": "200400100", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the general plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of a 1.37-acre vacant parcel of land--located south of Philadelphia street and west of Ramona Avenue--from \"public\" to RD12?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4935, "no_votes": 2712, "total_votes": 7647, "percent_yes": 64.53511180855237, "percent_no": 35.46488819144763, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.834514", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.670446", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the general plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation of a 1.37-acre vacant parcel of land--located south of Philadelphia street and west of Ramona Avenue--from \"public\" to RD12?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8608, "fingerprint": "2004|200400101|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400101|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "5b7a17c63b23cc50", "measure_id": "200400101", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the general plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation on a total of 9.05 acres of land--located at 11385-11435 Central Avenue (APNS 1014-052-13 and 14, and 1014-061-13)--from a general commercial zone (CG) to a residential zone (RD20) for a senior residential development?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5917, "no_votes": 1827, "total_votes": 7744, "percent_yes": 76.40754132231406, "percent_no": 23.59245867768594, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.834784", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.670630", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the general plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the land use designation on a total of 9.05 acres of land--located at 11385-11435 Central Avenue (APNS 1014-052-13 and 14, and 1014-061-13)--from a general commercial zone (CG) to a residential zone (RD20) for a senior residential development?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8609, "fingerprint": "2004|200400102|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400102|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "5ba16c55f6839d28", "measure_id": "200400102", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent severe cuts in general city services, including closure of a fire station, elimination of firefighters and reductions in police patrols, and to preserve city services promoting public welfare, including street and park maintenance, shall the City of Colton adopt a utility user tax not to exceed 4% for residential uses and 6% for commercial and industrial uses, as described in ordinance No. 0-01-04, exempting senior citizens and making the tax sunset on 6/30/11?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2633, "no_votes": 2244, "total_votes": 4877, "percent_yes": 53.98810744310026, "percent_no": 46.01189255689974, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.835089", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.670814", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent severe cuts in general city services, including closure of a fire station, elimination of firefighters and reductions in police patrols, and to preserve city services promoting public welfare, including street and park maintenance, shall the City of Colton adopt a utility user tax not to exceed 4% for residential uses and 6% for commercial and industrial uses, as described in ordinance No. 0-01-04, exempting senior citizens and making the tax sunset on 6/30/11?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8610, "fingerprint": "2004|200400103|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400103|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3d07a7475fc1252a", "measure_id": "200400103", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall resolution No. 2003-67, adopted August 25, 2003 by the Hesperia City Council, approving a municipal services agreement with the Timbisha Shoshone Tribe, become effective and upheld?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8340, "no_votes": 5930, "total_votes": 14270, "percent_yes": 58.44428871758935, "percent_no": 41.55571128241065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.835358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.670997", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall resolution No. 2003-67, adopted August 25, 2003 by the Hesperia City Council, approving a municipal services agreement with the Timbisha Shoshone Tribe, become effective and upheld?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8611, "fingerprint": "2004|200400104|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400104|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "fb9b0fc6d5f4bf52", "measure_id": "200400104", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To ensure a dependable and reliable revenue source for the Fire Department's Paramedic Emergency Services Program over the next 10 years, enabling paramedics to continue responding within an average of two to six minutes and to adequately maintain and upgrade essential equipment, shall the annual special tax for the paramedic program be increased by $28 per residential, $43 per small commercial, $121 per large commercial unit and $3 per bed for residential care facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6785, "no_votes": 2498, "total_votes": 9283, "percent_yes": 73.09059571259291, "percent_no": 26.909404287407085, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.835628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.671186", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure a dependable and reliable revenue source for the Fire Department's Paramedic Emergency Services Program over the next 10 years, enabling paramedics to continue responding within an average of two to six minutes and to adequately maintain and upgrade essential equipment, shall the annual special tax for the paramedic program be increased by $28 per residential, $43 per small commercial, $121 per large commercial unit and $3 per bed for residential care facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8606, "fingerprint": "2004|200400028|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400028|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "8a613bf4a4eed80d", "measure_id": "200400028", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a limited 4 year general tax terminating June 30, 2007 in the amount of $49.50 per year per parcel, both developed and undeveloped within the Morongo Valley Community Services District, be authorized to fund general governmental purposes, allowing for full-time fire protectoin and emergency response services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 545, "no_votes": 424, "total_votes": 969, "percent_yes": 56.24355005159959, "percent_no": 43.75644994840041, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.834197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.670261", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a limited 4 year general tax terminating June 30, 2007 in the amount of $49.50 per year per parcel, both developed and undeveloped within the Morongo Valley Community Services District, be authorized to fund general governmental purposes, allowing for full-time fire protectoin and emergency response services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11831, "fingerprint": "2004|200400318|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400318|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bf39eeeecc089c37", "measure_id": "200400318", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To relieve traffic congestion, improve safety, and match state/federal funds by: Expanding I-5, I-8, I-15, SR 52, SR 54, SR 56, SR 67, SR 76, SR 78, SR 94, SR 125, I-805; Maintaining/improving local roads; increasing transit for seniors and disabled persons; expanding commuter express bus, trolley, Coaster services; Shall San Diego County voters continue the existing half-cent transportation sales tax (SDCRTC Ordinance 0401) for forty years, including creating an Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee to conduct yearly audits ensuring voter mandates are met?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 682597, "no_votes": 336031, "total_votes": 1018628, "percent_yes": 67.01141142792069, "percent_no": 32.98858857207931, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.798774", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.842569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.675420", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve traffic congestion, improve safety, and match state/federal funds by: Expanding I-5, I-8, I-15, SR 52, SR 54, SR 56, SR 67, SR 76, SR 78, SR 94, SR 125, I-805; Maintaining/improving local roads; increasing transit for seniors and disabled persons; expanding commuter express bus, trolley, Coaster services; Shall San Diego County voters continue the existing half-cent transportation sales tax (SDCRTC Ordinance 0401) for forty years, including creating an Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee to conduct yearly audits ensuring voter mandates are met?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8624, "fingerprint": "2004|200400032|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400032|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5ca2439479e19d70", "measure_id": "200400032", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Rural Lands Initiative, which requires any newly subdivided parcels on approximately 694,000 acres of rural land in northern and eastern San Diego County to be a minimum of 40, 80, or 160 acres, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 210403, "no_votes": 379460, "total_votes": 589863, "percent_yes": 35.66980807407822, "percent_no": 64.33019192592178, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.839658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.673585", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Rural Lands Initiative, which requires any newly subdivided parcels on approximately 694,000 acres of rural land in northern and eastern San Diego County to be a minimum of 40, 80, or 160 acres, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11832, "fingerprint": "2004|200400319|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400319|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bcf4d32a84ce9433", "measure_id": "200400319", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall this Initiative be adopted for the purpose of preventing the future construction of the Gregory Canyon Landfill and Recycling Collection Center by repealing the 1994 voter-approved Gregory Canyon ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 372021, "no_votes": 649915, "total_votes": 1021936, "percent_yes": 36.40355169012541, "percent_no": 63.59644830987459, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.799051", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.842873", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.675606", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall this Initiative be adopted for the purpose of preventing the future construction of the Gregory Canyon Landfill and Recycling Collection Center by repealing the 1994 voter-approved Gregory Canyon ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8625, "fingerprint": "2004|200400033|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400033|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bcf4d32a84ce9433", "measure_id": "200400033", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall this Initiative be adopted for the purpose of preventing the future construction of the Gregory Canyon Landfill and Recycling Collection Center by repealing the 1994 voter-approved Gregory Canyon ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 111008, "no_votes": 110474, "total_votes": 221482, "percent_yes": 50.12055155723716, "percent_no": 49.87944844276284, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.839954", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.673767", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall this Initiative be adopted for the purpose of preventing the future construction of the Gregory Canyon Landfill and Recycling Collection Center by repealing the 1994 voter-approved Gregory Canyon ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11833, "fingerprint": "2004|200400320|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400320|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "131bcb487dcbf17e", "measure_id": "200400320", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) There are 35 separate agencies providing fire and emergency medical services in San Diego County's unincorporated area.  These agencies vary in size, personnel, funding, equipment and levels of service.  Would you support the consolidation of these 35 agencies into a single agency, provided that a consolidation results in a better-coordinated and enhanced delivery of fire protection and emergency medical services for your area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134783, "no_votes": 31601, "total_votes": 166384, "percent_yes": 81.00718819117223, "percent_no": 18.992811808827767, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.799326", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.843214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.675786", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) There are 35 separate agencies providing fire and emergency medical services in San Diego County's unincorporated area.  These agencies vary in size, personnel, funding, equipment and levels of service.  Would you support the consolidation of these 35 agencies into a single agency, provided that a consolidation results in a better-coordinated and enhanced delivery of fire protection and emergency medical services for your area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8628, "fingerprint": "2004|200400107|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400107|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "007a9f502240ba68", "measure_id": "200400107", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City increase the transient occupancy tax (TOT) paid by hotel and motel visitors by 2.5%, and shall these funds, along with some current TOT funds, be earmarked to fund Fire-Rescue and Police emergency services, equipment and facilities; road improvements; park and coastal improvements; tourism promotion; and library and arts programs; and shall public audits be conducted of the uses of these funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 152027, "no_votes": 94140, "total_votes": 246167, "percent_yes": 61.75766857458554, "percent_no": 38.24233142541446, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.840837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.674324", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the transient occupancy tax (TOT) paid by hotel and motel visitors by 2.5%, and shall these funds, along with some current TOT funds, be earmarked to fund Fire-Rescue and Police emergency services, equipment and facilities; road improvements; park and coastal improvements; tourism promotion; and library and arts programs; and shall public audits be conducted of the uses of these funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11834, "fingerprint": "2004|200400321|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400321|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4f77b38c781945c4", "measure_id": "200400321", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that the people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 337887, "no_votes": 71369, "total_votes": 409256, "percent_yes": 82.56128193600094, "percent_no": 17.43871806399906, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.799592", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.843485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.675967", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that the people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8626, "fingerprint": "2004|200400105|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400105|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bc305c72dc571a9d", "measure_id": "200400105", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve public safety, shall the City of La Mesa: upgrade 911 emergency response systems; add space for paramedic/firefighter equipment to improve response times to neighborhood fires/medical emergencies; repair/acquire land for replacement of old, outdated fire, police stations with earthquake-safe buildings/improvements, including Emergency Operations Center to coordinate disaster response; by issuing $25,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with Citizens' Oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11313, "no_votes": 3444, "total_votes": 14757, "percent_yes": 76.66192315511283, "percent_no": 23.33807684488717, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.840222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.673951", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve public safety, shall the City of La Mesa: upgrade 911 emergency response systems; add space for paramedic/firefighter equipment to improve response times to neighborhood fires/medical emergencies; repair/acquire land for replacement of old, outdated fire, police stations with earthquake-safe buildings/improvements, including Emergency Operations Center to coordinate disaster response; by issuing $25,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with Citizens' Oversight, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11838, "fingerprint": "2004|200400523|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400523|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e587cdc03b05bb63", "measure_id": "200400523", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to enable the Ethics Commission to retain its own legal counsel, rather than be represented by the City Attorney whose clients include City Officials who may be investigated by the Ethics Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 309091, "no_votes": 91600, "total_votes": 400691, "percent_yes": 77.13949152838472, "percent_no": 22.860508471615276, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.801773", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.846099", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.677628", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to enable the Ethics Commission to retain its own legal counsel, rather than be represented by the City Attorney whose clients include City Officials who may be investigated by the Ethics Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8627, "fingerprint": "2004|200400106|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400106|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a7739505228ef52d", "measure_id": "200400106", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted which would change the general plan and zoning designations of approximately twenty acres at the Northwest corner of Highway 67 and Poway Road from rural residential to automotive/general commercial?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2601, "no_votes": 12211, "total_votes": 14812, "percent_yes": 17.56008641641911, "percent_no": 82.43991358358089, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.840487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.674136", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted which would change the general plan and zoning designations of approximately twenty acres at the Northwest corner of Highway 67 and Poway Road from rural residential to automotive/general commercial?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11839, "fingerprint": "2004|200400524|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400524|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "253da6542e6ad3ae", "measure_id": "200400524", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to change from a City Manager structure of government to a Strong Mayor structure of government for a five year trial period starting January 1, 2006?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 209773, "no_votes": 198097, "total_votes": 407870, "percent_yes": 51.43133841665236, "percent_no": 48.56866158334764, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.801972", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.846367", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.677810", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to change from a City Manager structure of government to a Strong Mayor structure of government for a five year trial period starting January 1, 2006?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8629, "fingerprint": "2004|200400108|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400108|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d59d5c1b6bcf900b", "measure_id": "200400108", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the following Resolution No. 2003-6173, a Resolution adopted by the San Marcos City Council, approving a General Plan Amendment for University Commons amending the Questhaven/La Costa Meadows Community Plan with respect to Planning Areas 2 through 16 only, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8026, "no_votes": 5375, "total_votes": 13401, "percent_yes": 59.89105290649952, "percent_no": 40.10894709350048, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.841135", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.674506", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the following Resolution No. 2003-6173, a Resolution adopted by the San Marcos City Council, approving a General Plan Amendment for University Commons amending the Questhaven/La Costa Meadows Community Plan with respect to Planning Areas 2 through 16 only, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11840, "fingerprint": "2004|200400525|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400525|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d4abbfa5756d4960", "measure_id": "200400525", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to preclude any future multi-year agreement between the City and the Retirement Board delaying full actuarial funding of City contributions to the Retirement System, and defining the amortization schedules to be used for payment of costs associated with past service liability and costs associated with reducing the unfunded accrued actuarial liability of the pension system?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 202238, "no_votes": 175242, "total_votes": 377480, "percent_yes": 53.57581858641517, "percent_no": 46.42418141358483, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.802170", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.846636", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.677990", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to preclude any future multi-year agreement between the City and the Retirement Board delaying full actuarial funding of City contributions to the Retirement System, and defining the amortization schedules to be used for payment of costs associated with past service liability and costs associated with reducing the unfunded accrued actuarial liability of the pension system?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8630, "fingerprint": "2004|200400109|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400109|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "8c8c1d9dbcbcad81", "measure_id": "200400109", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the following Resolution No. 2003-6174, a Resolution adopted by the San Marcos City Council, approving a General Plan Amendment for University Commons amending the Questhaven/La Costa Meadows Community Plan with respect to Planning Area 1 only, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5580, "no_votes": 8705, "total_votes": 14285, "percent_yes": 39.06195309765488, "percent_no": 60.93804690234512, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.841402", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.674691", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the following Resolution No. 2003-6174, a Resolution adopted by the San Marcos City Council, approving a General Plan Amendment for University Commons amending the Questhaven/La Costa Meadows Community Plan with respect to Planning Area 1 only, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11841, "fingerprint": "2004|200400526|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400526|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "93ababdec753d5ce", "measure_id": "200400526", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to change the composition of the Retirement Board as follows: seven highly qualified citizen appointees without interests in the City's pension system, four members elected from classifications of active membership (one police, one fire, two general), one member elected from the ranks of the retired, and one member appointed by the City Manager from City management?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 247646, "no_votes": 134727, "total_votes": 382373, "percent_yes": 64.76555614543913, "percent_no": 35.234443854560865, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.802373", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.847022", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.678173", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to change the composition of the Retirement Board as follows: seven highly qualified citizen appointees without interests in the City's pension system, four members elected from classifications of active membership (one police, one fire, two general), one member elected from the ranks of the retired, and one member appointed by the City Manager from City management?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8631, "fingerprint": "2004|200400202|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400202|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bd52e57fe657e1d7", "measure_id": "200400202", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair aging local high schools, improve student safety, and quality for State matching funds, shall Grossmont Union High School District repair aging roofs, upgrade deteriorated plumbing, restrooms, electrical, technology, heating and cooling systems; improve fire safety and security systems; renovate outdated classrooms, science labs and school facilities; improve buildings and grounds for safety; and construct a new school; by issuing $274,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight, and all money benefiting our community.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61406, "no_votes": 37623, "total_votes": 99029, "percent_yes": 62.00809863777277, "percent_no": 37.99190136222723, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.841673", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.674872", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair aging local high schools, improve student safety, and quality for State matching funds, shall Grossmont Union High School District repair aging roofs, upgrade deteriorated plumbing, restrooms, electrical, technology, heating and cooling systems; improve fire safety and security systems; renovate outdated classrooms, science labs and school facilities; improve buildings and grounds for safety; and construct a new school; by issuing $274,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight, and all money benefiting our community.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11842, "fingerprint": "2004|200400527|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400527|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b285e1846754c990", "measure_id": "200400527", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter and the San Diego Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax (TOT) paid solely by hotel and motel visitors from 10.5% to 13% to be used for general governmental purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 175031, "no_votes": 245805, "total_votes": 420836, "percent_yes": 41.5912612038894, "percent_no": 58.4087387961106, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.802575", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.847290", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.678357", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter and the San Diego Municipal Code be amended to increase the transient occupancy tax (TOT) paid solely by hotel and motel visitors from 10.5% to 13% to be used for general governmental purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8633, "fingerprint": "2004|200400204|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400204|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4622cb9496c575ea", "measure_id": "200400204", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education, reduce the impact of unprecedented State budget cuts on classroom instruction, retain qualified teachers, maintain up-to-date textbooks and minimize reduction of essential academic programs, shall Santee School District levy $60 per residential parcel annually for 5 years, with an exemption for seniors, with no proceeds for administrator salaries, with accountability measures and all funds remaining in Santee to benefit local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7568, "no_votes": 6236, "total_votes": 13804, "percent_yes": 54.82468849608809, "percent_no": 45.17531150391191, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.842263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.675240", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education, reduce the impact of unprecedented State budget cuts on classroom instruction, retain qualified teachers, maintain up-to-date textbooks and minimize reduction of essential academic programs, shall Santee School District levy $60 per residential parcel annually for 5 years, with an exemption for seniors, with no proceeds for administrator salaries, with accountability measures and all funds remaining in Santee to benefit local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11843, "fingerprint": "2004|200400528|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400528|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "63a5820f97724325", "measure_id": "200400528", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City be authorized to remove from dedicated park status and sell to the highest bidder a portion of Mount Soledad Natural Park, subject to a lease to the Mount Soledad Memorial Association to preserve and maintain the existing granite walls and plaques, and to transfer ownership of the cross to the new buyer who will determine whether to maintain, relocate, or remove the cross or to replace it with another appropriate monument?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 177062, "no_votes": 256745, "total_votes": 433807, "percent_yes": 40.81584667836158, "percent_no": 59.18415332163842, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.802775", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.847559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.678540", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City be authorized to remove from dedicated park status and sell to the highest bidder a portion of Mount Soledad Natural Park, subject to a lease to the Mount Soledad Memorial Association to preserve and maintain the existing granite walls and plaques, and to transfer ownership of the cross to the new buyer who will determine whether to maintain, relocate, or remove the cross or to replace it with another appropriate monument?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8632, "fingerprint": "2004|200400203|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400203|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "42b80c91cd7a3c5d", "measure_id": "200400203", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student safety, upgrade facilities and comply with State law by: constructing, repairing, renovating, replacing and equipping permanent buildings and sites, and removing portable buildings, at the Rowe School, including, in part, classroom, computer technology, ADA compliance, fire safety and seismic improvements, shall Rancho Santa Fe School District issue $4,800,000 of bonds at legal rates with citizens oversight, guaranteed independent financial audits, no waste, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1417, "no_votes": 821, "total_votes": 2238, "percent_yes": 63.31546023235032, "percent_no": 36.68453976764968, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.841940", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.675055", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student safety, upgrade facilities and comply with State law by: constructing, repairing, renovating, replacing and equipping permanent buildings and sites, and removing portable buildings, at the Rowe School, including, in part, classroom, computer technology, ADA compliance, fire safety and seismic improvements, shall Rancho Santa Fe School District issue $4,800,000 of bonds at legal rates with citizens oversight, guaranteed independent financial audits, no waste, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11835, "fingerprint": "2004|200400515|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400515|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3aa7ae3b9145d545", "measure_id": "200400515", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance requiring the amendment of the City of Coronado General Plan to establish access to southbound Glorietta Boulevard from Fourth Street and the Coronado Bridge toll plaza from state highway (the bridge) to state highway (Silver Strand Boulevard) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3918, "no_votes": 4966, "total_votes": 8884, "percent_yes": 44.10175596578118, "percent_no": 55.89824403421882, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.799884", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.843783", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.676151", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance requiring the amendment of the City of Coronado General Plan to establish access to southbound Glorietta Boulevard from Fourth Street and the Coronado Bridge toll plaza from state highway (the bridge) to state highway (Silver Strand Boulevard) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8621, "fingerprint": "2004|200400029|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400029|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5a31c2476ad7a078", "measure_id": "200400029", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area No. 110 - Palomar Mountain be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 93, "no_votes": 35, "total_votes": 128, "percent_yes": 72.65625, "percent_no": 27.34375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.838761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.673035", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area No. 110 - Palomar Mountain be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11836, "fingerprint": "2004|200400516|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400516|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bb73ccc03fd2be96", "measure_id": "200400516", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance directing the City to remove the traffic semi-diverters located on A, B and C Avenues at their intersections with Pomona Avenue and Third Street be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6007, "no_votes": 2837, "total_votes": 8844, "percent_yes": 67.92175486205338, "percent_no": 32.078245137946624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.800173", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.844054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.676337", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance directing the City to remove the traffic semi-diverters located on A, B and C Avenues at their intersections with Pomona Avenue and Third Street be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8622, "fingerprint": "2004|200400030|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400030|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ef7f85d488867d3a", "measure_id": "200400030", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area No. 111 - Boulevard be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 172, "no_votes": 226, "total_votes": 398, "percent_yes": 43.21608040201005, "percent_no": 56.78391959798995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.839085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.673219", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area No. 111 - Boulevard be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11837, "fingerprint": "2004|200400517|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400517|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "045640423c7649b3", "measure_id": "200400517", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Del Mar be amended to allow the City to impose a real property transfer tax by an amount not to exceed $6 per $1,000 of value on sales and eligible transfers of real property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 653, "no_votes": 1986, "total_votes": 2639, "percent_yes": 24.74422129594543, "percent_no": 75.25577870405456, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.800471", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.844328", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.676520", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Del Mar be amended to allow the City to impose a real property transfer tax by an amount not to exceed $6 per $1,000 of value on sales and eligible transfers of real property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8623, "fingerprint": "2004|200400031|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400031|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b3b6fb0c1fedb8d6", "measure_id": "200400031", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area No. 112 - Campo be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 128, "no_votes": 208, "total_votes": 336, "percent_yes": 38.09523809523809, "percent_no": 61.90476190476191, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.839356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.673402", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area No. 112 - Campo be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8634, "fingerprint": "2004|200400518|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400518|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a9addecbe37fcdb6", "measure_id": "200400518", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve public safety and emergency response throughout El Cajon by replacing aging, overcrowded police and fire facilities with combined earthquake-safe facilities including the latest public safety technology and an Emergency Operations Center to coordinate disaster response, relocating or upgrading aging fire stations, and replacing deteriorated animal control facilities; shall The City of El Cajon implement a half-cent sales tax for 10 years only with annual audits, independent Citizens' Oversight, and all funds benefiting our local community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19539, "no_votes": 8812, "total_votes": 28351, "percent_yes": 68.91820394342352, "percent_no": 31.08179605657648, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.844602", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.676708", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve public safety and emergency response throughout El Cajon by replacing aging, overcrowded police and fire facilities with combined earthquake-safe facilities including the latest public safety technology and an Emergency Operations Center to coordinate disaster response, relocating or upgrading aging fire stations, and replacing deteriorated animal control facilities; shall The City of El Cajon implement a half-cent sales tax for 10 years only with annual audits, independent Citizens' Oversight, and all funds benefiting our local community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8635, "fingerprint": "2004|200400519|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400519|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "dc5d9d40f40aef88", "measure_id": "200400519", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve fire and police response times, better coordinate emergency/disaster response and public communication, and improve paramedic response, gang/drug enforcement and prevention, shall the City of Escondido construct, upgrade, and acquire land for fire stations, including emergency response training centers and combined Police/Fire Headquarters, by issuing bonds up to $84,350,000 at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, independent financial audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26103, "no_votes": 12478, "total_votes": 38581, "percent_yes": 67.6576553225681, "percent_no": 32.342344677431896, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.844950", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.676895", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve fire and police response times, better coordinate emergency/disaster response and public communication, and improve paramedic response, gang/drug enforcement and prevention, shall the City of Escondido construct, upgrade, and acquire land for fire stations, including emergency response training centers and combined Police/Fire Headquarters, by issuing bonds up to $84,350,000 at legal rates, with citizens' oversight, independent financial audits, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8636, "fingerprint": "2004|200400520|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400520|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "847286ef7821c939", "measure_id": "200400520", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve the quality of library services by increasing computer access, enlarging the book collection and children's reading areas, shall the City of Lemon Grove issue $3,400,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, paid back through a property assessment for up to forty years, for the acquisition, construction and improvement of a new community library and conference center, with the facility's maintenance expenses funded by the General Fund which also funds public safety, street improvements, and community programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5560, "no_votes": 3244, "total_votes": 8804, "percent_yes": 63.1531122217174, "percent_no": 36.8468877782826, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.845221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.677080", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of library services by increasing computer access, enlarging the book collection and children's reading areas, shall the City of Lemon Grove issue $3,400,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, paid back through a property assessment for up to forty years, for the acquisition, construction and improvement of a new community library and conference center, with the facility's maintenance expenses funded by the General Fund which also funds public safety, street improvements, and community programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8637, "fingerprint": "2004|200400521|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400521|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "538d464e033afd25", "measure_id": "200400521", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of National City be authorized to issue general obligation bonds up to a maximum principal amount of $12,330,000 to acquire and construct new public safety facilities, and to modernize existing public safety facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6414, "no_votes": 3408, "total_votes": 9822, "percent_yes": 65.30238240684179, "percent_no": 34.69761759315821, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.845488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.677265", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of National City be authorized to issue general obligation bonds up to a maximum principal amount of $12,330,000 to acquire and construct new public safety facilities, and to modernize existing public safety facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8638, "fingerprint": "2004|200400522|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400522|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d71088639e2595e4", "measure_id": "200400522", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a term limit of three consecutive terms for the Office of the Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6916, "no_votes": 2971, "total_votes": 9887, "percent_yes": 69.95043997167998, "percent_no": 30.049560028320016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.845832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.677446", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a term limit of three consecutive terms for the Office of the Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8639, "fingerprint": "2004|200400529|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400529|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6c94176f2e8ea917", "measure_id": "200400529", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City's Charter be amended to provide that the City shall not own or operate a natural gas and electricity distribution system within the City's boundaries for ten years, without a public vote, an independent audit, a guarantee that energy distribution rates will be equal to or lower than existing utility's, and certification that the City will not incur debt or use the general fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15897, "no_votes": 4500, "total_votes": 20397, "percent_yes": 77.93793204883072, "percent_no": 22.062067951169283, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.847914", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.678727", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's Charter be amended to provide that the City shall not own or operate a natural gas and electricity distribution system within the City's boundaries for ten years, without a public vote, an independent audit, a guarantee that energy distribution rates will be equal to or lower than existing utility's, and certification that the City will not incur debt or use the general fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8640, "fingerprint": "2004|200400530|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400530|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "451b9fda4a8180a4", "measure_id": "200400530", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require an affirmative vote of a majority of the electorate to amend Section 2.08.030(b) of the San Marcos Municipal Code to exceed the maximum annual upward adjustment of five percent (5%) for meeting stipends paid to members of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12944, "no_votes": 6767, "total_votes": 19711, "percent_yes": 65.6689158337984, "percent_no": 34.331084166201606, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.848186", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.678911", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require an affirmative vote of a majority of the electorate to amend Section 2.08.030(b) of the San Marcos Municipal Code to exceed the maximum annual upward adjustment of five percent (5%) for meeting stipends paid to members of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8641, "fingerprint": "2004|200400531|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400531|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5660c182cfac8bff", "measure_id": "200400531", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require an affirmative vote of a majority of the electorate to amend the prohibition against duplicate reimbursement to City Councilmembers for expenses already paid for in full or in part by the City from any other source?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14666, "no_votes": 5117, "total_votes": 19783, "percent_yes": 74.13435778193399, "percent_no": 25.865642218066014, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.848453", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.679092", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to require an affirmative vote of a majority of the electorate to amend the prohibition against duplicate reimbursement to City Councilmembers for expenses already paid for in full or in part by the City from any other source?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8642, "fingerprint": "2004|200400532|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400532|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "548bdf57bf1c6dec", "measure_id": "200400532", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the San Marcos City Charter be amended by adding 16 new provisions encompassing 1,700 words restricting the City's current right to enter into contracts for natural gas and electric utility services unless certain criteria are first met, including, but not limited to, a requirement that the City charge the same cumulative rate as is charged by the City's incumbent franchisee, and a requirement for contract approval by voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11064, "no_votes": 7354, "total_votes": 18418, "percent_yes": 60.0716690194375, "percent_no": 39.9283309805625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.848721", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.679273", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Marcos City Charter be amended by adding 16 new provisions encompassing 1,700 words restricting the City's current right to enter into contracts for natural gas and electric utility services unless certain criteria are first met, including, but not limited to, a requirement that the City charge the same cumulative rate as is charged by the City's incumbent franchisee, and a requirement for contract approval by voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8643, "fingerprint": "2004|200400670|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400670|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5ab97e1e7e26a9f5", "measure_id": "200400670", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education, partially offset State funding cuts, and retain our best teachers by: Ensuring adequate textbooks, restoring reading specialists at all schools, ensuring safe schools, restoring school library access, and reinstating music programs, shall Santee School District levy $60 per residential parcel and $400 per nonresidential parcel annually for 5 years, with seniors' exemptions, no proceeds for administrator salaries, a citizen's oversight committee, annual audits, and all funds remaining in Santee to benefit local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14165, "no_votes": 9167, "total_votes": 23332, "percent_yes": 60.71061203497343, "percent_no": 39.28938796502657, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.848997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.679457", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education, partially offset State funding cuts, and retain our best teachers by: Ensuring adequate textbooks, restoring reading specialists at all schools, ensuring safe schools, restoring school library access, and reinstating music programs, shall Santee School District levy $60 per residential parcel and $400 per nonresidential parcel annually for 5 years, with seniors' exemptions, no proceeds for administrator salaries, a citizen's oversight committee, annual audits, and all funds remaining in Santee to benefit local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8644, "fingerprint": "2004|200400034|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400034|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ba1620f69d3de223", "measure_id": "200400034", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART; (B) New transbay commuter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network; (D) New expanded ferry service; (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail; (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115891, "no_votes": 53214, "total_votes": 169105, "percent_yes": 68.53197717394518, "percent_no": 31.46802282605482, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.849268", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.679731", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART; (B) New transbay commuter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network; (D) New expanded ferry service; (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail; (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11844, "fingerprint": "2004|200400322|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400322|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6af757ac7544eb45", "measure_id": "200400322", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City borrow $200,000 to buy, build or renovate supportive and affordable housing and assist low- and moderate-income individuals and households to buy a home?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 209259, "no_votes": 116706, "total_votes": 325965, "percent_yes": 64.19676959182735, "percent_no": 35.80323040817265, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.807089", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.852437", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.682067", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City borrow $200,000 to buy, build or renovate supportive and affordable housing and assist low- and moderate-income individuals and households to buy a home?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8645, "fingerprint": "2004|200400035|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400035|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "63c2ba4dca91ec35", "measure_id": "200400035", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall City employees who receive a cash payment for unused vacation time and sick leave be permitted to defer this payment and defer state and federal taxes on this payment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107690, "no_votes": 64943, "total_votes": 172633, "percent_yes": 62.38088893780448, "percent_no": 37.61911106219552, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.849631", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.680151", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City employees who receive a cash payment for unused vacation time and sick leave be permitted to defer this payment and defer state and federal taxes on this payment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11845, "fingerprint": "2004|200400323|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400323|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "534146c8e876d5c2", "measure_id": "200400323", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City borrow $60,000,000 to buy, renovate or preserve historical resources owned by the City or the San Francisco Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 181658, "no_votes": 134896, "total_votes": 316554, "percent_yes": 57.386101581404745, "percent_no": 42.613898418595255, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.807351", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.852857", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.682257", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City borrow $60,000,000 to buy, renovate or preserve historical resources owned by the City or the San Francisco Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8646, "fingerprint": "2004|200400036|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400036|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "c3098208ff950463", "measure_id": "200400036", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "May the City contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System for retirement benefits for District Attorneys, Public Defenders and Public Defender investigators if there is no change in cost to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 114209, "no_votes": 54418, "total_votes": 168627, "percent_yes": 67.7287741583495, "percent_no": 32.271225841650505, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.849900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.680352", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "May the City contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System for retirement benefits for District Attorneys, Public Defenders and Public Defender investigators if there is no change in cost to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11846, "fingerprint": "2004|200400324|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400324|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "92918fe14a947110", "measure_id": "200400324", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Health Services System be a separate City department, and shall the Health Service Board be authorized to appoint and remove the manager of the Health Service System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 166651, "no_votes": 129210, "total_votes": 295861, "percent_yes": 56.327464586410514, "percent_no": 43.672535413589486, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.807609", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.853160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.682443", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Health Services System be a separate City department, and shall the Health Service Board be authorized to appoint and remove the manager of the Health Service System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8647, "fingerprint": "2004|200400037|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400037|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "cce58d9ff63d18c9", "measure_id": "200400037", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City reduce the required number of uniformed Police officers if the City fills certain positions currently performed by uniformed officers with civilian staff?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 105005, "no_votes": 64773, "total_votes": 169778, "percent_yes": 61.84841381097669, "percent_no": 38.15158618902331, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.850165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.680546", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City reduce the required number of uniformed Police officers if the City fills certain positions currently performed by uniformed officers with civilian staff?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11847, "fingerprint": "2004|200400325|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400325|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "fccc46e7514d1bdb", "measure_id": "200400325", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Charter rules be changed concerning the deadlines and number of votes required for action by the Board of Supervisors, the number of aides per Board member, and the length of time commissioners may serve after their term has expired?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 118123, "no_votes": 162385, "total_votes": 280508, "percent_yes": 42.11038544355241, "percent_no": 57.88961455644759, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.807874", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.853451", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.682638", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Charter rules be changed concerning the deadlines and number of votes required for action by the Board of Supervisors, the number of aides per Board member, and the length of time commissioners may serve after their term has expired?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8648, "fingerprint": "2004|200400038|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400038|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9f7f87d68f546bed", "measure_id": "200400038", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall domestic partners be allowed to register in the City, even if they live or work outside the City, and shall the City Employees' Retirement System treat domestic partners as spouses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 113646, "no_votes": 60999, "total_votes": 174645, "percent_yes": 65.072575796616, "percent_no": 34.92742420338401, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.850432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.680739", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall domestic partners be allowed to register in the City, even if they live or work outside the City, and shall the City Employees' Retirement System treat domestic partners as spouses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11848, "fingerprint": "2004|200400326|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400326|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "dcdf04d7ad9cfbbb", "measure_id": "200400326", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City pay the survivor of a police officer or firefighter who dies in the line of duty 100% of retirement benefits the officer or firefighter would have received?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 210091, "no_votes": 108193, "total_votes": 318284, "percent_yes": 66.00740219426675, "percent_no": 33.992597805733254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.808150", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.853756", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.682824", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City pay the survivor of a police officer or firefighter who dies in the line of duty 100% of retirement benefits the officer or firefighter would have received?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8649, "fingerprint": "2004|200400039|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400039|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9bb0b84ff44605cf", "measure_id": "200400039", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors, rather than individual departments and officials, respond to requests made by the federal or state government for records that may contain private information about citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 87704, "no_votes": 80236, "total_votes": 167940, "percent_yes": 52.223413123734666, "percent_no": 47.776586876265334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.850742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.680930", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors, rather than individual departments and officials, respond to requests made by the federal or state government for records that may contain private information about citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11849, "fingerprint": "2004|200400327|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400327|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ee83201c0d630a81", "measure_id": "200400327", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "May San Francisco residents who are 18 or older vote in School Board elections, whether or not the resident is a United States citizen, if the resident is a parent, guardian or care-giver of a child in the School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 155643, "no_votes": 164924, "total_votes": 320567, "percent_yes": 48.55240870083321, "percent_no": 51.44759129916679, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.808431", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.854045", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.683012", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "May San Francisco residents who are 18 or older vote in School Board elections, whether or not the resident is a United States citizen, if the resident is a parent, guardian or care-giver of a child in the School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8650, "fingerprint": "2004|200400040|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400040|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2204ca71572c9a12", "measure_id": "200400040", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the rules that apply to labor negotiations with the uniformed members of the Police and Fire departments also apply to labor negotiations with the deputy sheriffs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 103327, "no_votes": 60267, "total_votes": 163594, "percent_yes": 63.16062936293507, "percent_no": 36.83937063706493, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.851010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.681117", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the rules that apply to labor negotiations with the uniformed members of the Police and Fire departments also apply to labor negotiations with the deputy sheriffs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11850, "fingerprint": "2004|200400328|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400328|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f4f9ae3893306f52", "measure_id": "200400328", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City authorize the Health Service Board to establish health plans for City residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 201674, "no_votes": 100206, "total_votes": 301880, "percent_yes": 66.8060156353518, "percent_no": 33.1939843646482, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.808954", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.854407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.683198", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City authorize the Health Service Board to establish health plans for City residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8651, "fingerprint": "2004|200400041|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400041|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "868e2185018f8cd8", "measure_id": "200400041", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "May the city provide supplemental pay for more than 180 days to City employees called for military service, and may the City provide this pay retroactively?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 99726, "no_votes": 69589, "total_votes": 169315, "percent_yes": 58.89968402090777, "percent_no": 41.10031597909223, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.851276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.681309", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "May the city provide supplemental pay for more than 180 days to City employees called for military service, and may the City provide this pay retroactively?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11851, "fingerprint": "2004|200400329|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400329|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a0ef4a2a1d4abe31", "measure_id": "200400329", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City-owned sports stadium at Candlestick Point be named \"Candelstick Park?\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 170217, "no_votes": 141904, "total_votes": 312121, "percent_yes": 54.53558075233643, "percent_no": 45.46441924766357, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.809316", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.854708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.683383", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City-owned sports stadium at Candlestick Point be named \"Candelstick Park?\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8652, "fingerprint": "2004|200400042|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400042|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b2d569ac6ed02077", "measure_id": "200400042", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create a fund to increase the City's spending for public education over the next eleven years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 123103, "no_votes": 50837, "total_votes": 173940, "percent_yes": 70.77325514545245, "percent_no": 29.226744854547547, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.851543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.681497", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create a fund to increase the City's spending for public education over the next eleven years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11852, "fingerprint": "2004|200400330|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400330|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "60770ff1cc0eb162", "measure_id": "200400330", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City hire economists to study proposed legislation and report on the likely impact on the local economy, and shall the City develop a long-term Economic Development Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 154022, "no_votes": 142650, "total_votes": 296672, "percent_yes": 51.91659475784704, "percent_no": 48.08340524215296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.809636", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.855000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.683569", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City hire economists to study proposed legislation and report on the likely impact on the local economy, and shall the City develop a long-term Economic Development Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8653, "fingerprint": "2004|200400043|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400043|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "38bbd792aaea6397", "measure_id": "200400043", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Muni be required to replace diesel buses purchased before 1991, and shall any new Muni vehicles be required to meet the anti-pollution standards that apply to other City vehicles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 118074, "no_votes": 56864, "total_votes": 174938, "percent_yes": 67.49476957550675, "percent_no": 32.50523042449325, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.851897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.681689", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Muni be required to replace diesel buses purchased before 1991, and shall any new Muni vehicles be required to meet the anti-pollution standards that apply to other City vehicles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11853, "fingerprint": "2004|200400331|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400331|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ca9e2455097775bd", "measure_id": "200400331", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase the local sales tax by 1/4% (one-quarter-of-one-percent)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 182477, "no_votes": 131529, "total_votes": 314006, "percent_yes": 58.11258383597766, "percent_no": 41.88741616402234, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.809944", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.855285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.683760", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the local sales tax by 1/4% (one-quarter-of-one-percent)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8654, "fingerprint": "2004|200400044|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400044|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "5f45c3281511c0d3", "measure_id": "200400044", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall housing developments located downtown or along the central waterfront be subjet to less-restrictive density and height rules than other housing developments if the developer builds and sells additional below-market rate housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121352, "no_votes": 52028, "total_votes": 173380, "percent_yes": 69.991925250894, "percent_no": 30.008074749106, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.852166", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.681876", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall housing developments located downtown or along the central waterfront be subjet to less-restrictive density and height rules than other housing developments if the developer builds and sells additional below-market rate housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8655, "fingerprint": "2004|200400332|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400332|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "09e699110fe69070", "measure_id": "200400332", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create a temporary 0.1% (one-tenth-of-one-percent) gross receipts tax, and clarify how the City's existing payroll expense tax applies to certain business entities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 135068, "no_votes": 162910, "total_votes": 297978, "percent_yes": 45.32817859036573, "percent_no": 54.67182140963427, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.855571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.683949", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create a temporary 0.1% (one-tenth-of-one-percent) gross receipts tax, and clarify how the City's existing payroll expense tax applies to certain business entities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8656, "fingerprint": "2004|200400333|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400333|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "06d50035b4638580", "measure_id": "200400333", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall 15% of the existing hotel tax surcharge be set aside to acquire, preserve and maintain neighborhood and single-screen movie theaters and promote local film-making industry?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78157, "no_votes": 229487, "total_votes": 307644, "percent_yes": 25.40501358713318, "percent_no": 74.59498641286682, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.855867", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.684138", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall 15% of the existing hotel tax surcharge be set aside to acquire, preserve and maintain neighborhood and single-screen movie theaters and promote local film-making industry?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8657, "fingerprint": "2004|200400334|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400334|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "feedee346c6c58e9", "measure_id": "200400334", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City policy to urge the United States government to withdraw all troops from Iraq and bring all military personnel in Iraq back to the United States?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 195257, "no_votes": 113053, "total_votes": 308310, "percent_yes": 63.33138724011547, "percent_no": 36.66861275988453, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.856157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.684323", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City policy to urge the United States government to withdraw all troops from Iraq and bring all military personnel in Iraq back to the United States?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8658, "fingerprint": "2004|200400335|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400335|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "8ab4dbe21b3f8983", "measure_id": "200400335", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to use additional sales tax funds resulting from approval of Proposition J to assist low-income residents including seniors, the disabled, children and the homeless?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 181340, "no_votes": 122644, "total_votes": 303984, "percent_yes": 59.65445549765778, "percent_no": 40.34554450234222, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.856444", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.684508", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to use additional sales tax funds resulting from approval of Proposition J to assist low-income residents including seniors, the disabled, children and the homeless?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8674, "fingerprint": "2004|200400672|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400672|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "897e363e6d077380", "measure_id": "200400672", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Modesto Junior College and Columbia College students for jobs and four-year college, repair buildings, and increase access to educational opportunities by repairing, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, science labs, establishing new and expanded college education centers in Turlock, Oakdale, Patterson, and Calaveras County, and acquiring land, modernizing classroom technology, shall Yosemite Community College District issue $326,174,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a Citzens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3120, "no_votes": 2797, "total_votes": 5917, "percent_yes": 52.72942369443975, "percent_no": 47.27057630556025, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.861824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.687776", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Modesto Junior College and Columbia College students for jobs and four-year college, repair buildings, and increase access to educational opportunities by repairing, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, science labs, establishing new and expanded college education centers in Turlock, Oakdale, Patterson, and Calaveras County, and acquiring land, modernizing classroom technology, shall Yosemite Community College District issue $326,174,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a Citzens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8660, "fingerprint": "2004|200400205|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400205|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "384cd5a1e693bd94", "measure_id": "200400205", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "The \"Facilities Master Plan\" defines the need for a new high school, improvements to Galt High School, and a new complex to house continuation/adult education/administration offices relieving overcrowding at Galt High.  Shall the Galt Joint Union High School District construct new facilities to deal with ongoing continued growth in the District by issuing $16,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing annual audits and establishing a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 830, "no_votes": 413, "total_votes": 1243, "percent_yes": 66.7739340305712, "percent_no": 33.2260659694288, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.857036", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.684902", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The \"Facilities Master Plan\" defines the need for a new high school, improvements to Galt High School, and a new complex to house continuation/adult education/administration offices relieving overcrowding at Galt High.  Shall the Galt Joint Union High School District construct new facilities to deal with ongoing continued growth in the District by issuing $16,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing annual audits and establishing a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8662, "fingerprint": "2004|200400207|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400207|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "e13b99224cc3717c", "measure_id": "200400207", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/transfer to four year colleges, repair buildings, improve safety, accommodate growing enrollment by: Reparing leaky roofs, decaying walls, electrical wiring; Improving fire safety; Removing asbestors; Expanding/establishing Stockton, Manteca, Tracy, Lodi/Galt, Foothill Area campuses/Education centers; Upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District issue $250,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55445, "no_votes": 40713, "total_votes": 96158, "percent_yes": 57.66030907464798, "percent_no": 42.33969092535202, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.857747", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.685287", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/transfer to four year colleges, repair buildings, improve safety, accommodate growing enrollment by: Reparing leaky roofs, decaying walls, electrical wiring; Improving fire safety; Removing asbestors; Expanding/establishing Stockton, Manteca, Tracy, Lodi/Galt, Foothill Area campuses/Education centers; Upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, classrooms; shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District issue $250,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8661, "fingerprint": "2004|200400206|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400206|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "cf5147ded566e253", "measure_id": "200400206", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funding for new elementary, middle and high schools, athletic facilities, libraries and other projects to relieve student overcrowding, to repair major building systems and modernize existing schools for student health and safety, and to qualify for up to $70,000,000 in State matching funds, shall Manteca Unified School District issue $66,000,000 of bonds bearing interest at rates within the legal limit, with annual performance/financial audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7867, "no_votes": 6144, "total_votes": 14011, "percent_yes": 56.14874027549782, "percent_no": 43.85125972450218, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.857326", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.685097", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for new elementary, middle and high schools, athletic facilities, libraries and other projects to relieve student overcrowding, to repair major building systems and modernize existing schools for student health and safety, and to qualify for up to $70,000,000 in State matching funds, shall Manteca Unified School District issue $66,000,000 of bonds bearing interest at rates within the legal limit, with annual performance/financial audits, an independent citizens' oversight committee, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8659, "fingerprint": "2004|200400110|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400110|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "dfba20a95d6c14eb", "measure_id": "200400110", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Stockton adopt a Charter amendment to provide veteran's preference points to any honorably discharged veteran who has served in any branch of the United States Armed Forces, including the National Guard and the United States Coast Guard for at least 181 consecutive days and has been honorably discharged?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26315, "no_votes": 10854, "total_votes": 37169, "percent_yes": 70.79824585003632, "percent_no": 29.201754149963676, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.856733", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.684712", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Stockton adopt a Charter amendment to provide veteran's preference points to any honorably discharged veteran who has served in any branch of the United States Armed Forces, including the National Guard and the United States Coast Guard for at least 181 consecutive days and has been honorably discharged?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8673, "fingerprint": "2004|200400671|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400671|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "82b135af667a7396", "measure_id": "200400671", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Lincoln Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; construct and renovate school libraries; improve student access to classroom computers and modern technology; renovate restrooms; and qualify the District to receive $19 million in State grants by issuing $50 million in bonds within legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12065, "no_votes": 4860, "total_votes": 16925, "percent_yes": 71.28590576365134, "percent_no": 28.714094236348657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.861529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.687580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Lincoln Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and school facilities; make health and safety improvements; construct and renovate school libraries; improve student access to classroom computers and modern technology; renovate restrooms; and qualify the District to receive $19 million in State grants by issuing $50 million in bonds within legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8667, "fingerprint": "2004|200400536|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400536|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "46cfb7d9ad1e1275", "measure_id": "200400536", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Stockton General Plan be amended to establish an Urban Growth Boundary unil June 30, 2024, unless approved by a majority or the voters; allow land outside the Boundary to be used for 'open space'; and adopt a General Plan Policy to encourage the Lodi City Council to adopt a policy to maintain a community separator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33749, "no_votes": 33291, "total_votes": 67040, "percent_yes": 50.34158711217184, "percent_no": 49.65841288782816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.859336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.686239", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Stockton General Plan be amended to establish an Urban Growth Boundary unil June 30, 2024, unless approved by a majority or the voters; allow land outside the Boundary to be used for 'open space'; and adopt a General Plan Policy to encourage the Lodi City Council to adopt a policy to maintain a community separator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8664, "fingerprint": "2004|200400533|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400533|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "e49aa1934479f0b6", "measure_id": "200400533", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the construction of new, rebuilt, or expanded retail structures in excess of 125,00 square feet (including outside retail sales areas) unless approved by the City Council and a majority of the voters voting at a city wide election be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8701, "no_votes": 11694, "total_votes": 20395, "percent_yes": 42.66241725913214, "percent_no": 57.33758274086786, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.858443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.685668", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the construction of new, rebuilt, or expanded retail structures in excess of 125,00 square feet (including outside retail sales areas) unless approved by the City Council and a majority of the voters voting at a city wide election be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11854, "fingerprint": "2004|200400537|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400537|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "e1ee0dc3dd12cb9d", "measure_id": "200400537", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be approved to amend the Stockton Municipal Code to create a Greenbelt between Stockton and Lodi and to provide regulations to protect and promote farming operations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42880, "no_votes": 22995, "total_votes": 65875, "percent_yes": 65.09297912713473, "percent_no": 34.907020872865274, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.813999", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.859629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.686428", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be approved to amend the Stockton Municipal Code to create a Greenbelt between Stockton and Lodi and to provide regulations to protect and promote farming operations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8663, "fingerprint": "2004|200400208|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400208|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "dd371e07ea91674c", "measure_id": "200400208", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Valley Home Joint Elementary School District prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $1.4 million of bonds at interst rates below the legal limit?  Funds received from this bond will serve as a match for \"State of California Joint Use Funds\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 51, "percent_yes": 82.35294117647058, "percent_no": 17.64705882352942, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.858066", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.685475", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Valley Home Joint Elementary School District prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $1.4 million of bonds at interst rates below the legal limit?  Funds received from this bond will serve as a match for \"State of California Joint Use Funds\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8668, "fingerprint": "2004|200400538|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400538|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "cbac13e453a9dd74", "measure_id": "200400538", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Stockton be required to adopt a Greenbelt Master Plan on or before June 30, 2006, and to establish a Financing Implementation Plan to provide funds to compensate property owners affected by the Greenbelt Master Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31508, "no_votes": 33484, "total_votes": 64992, "percent_yes": 48.47981290004923, "percent_no": 51.52018709995077, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.859962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.686629", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Stockton be required to adopt a Greenbelt Master Plan on or before June 30, 2006, and to establish a Financing Implementation Plan to provide funds to compensate property owners affected by the Greenbelt Master Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8671, "fingerprint": "2004|200400541|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400541|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "6d6d398f02b919a6", "measure_id": "200400541", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall amendments to the Residental Growth Management Plan (also know as the Growth Management Ordinance) be adopted to allow an annual allocation of up to 600 Residental Growth Allotments (\"RGAs\") and residental building permits (\"permits\") to the Tracy Hills Community Area, and the exclusion of those RGAs and permits from the existing annual allocation calculation, subject to dedication of proposed fees and applicable development regulations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6399, "no_votes": 15260, "total_votes": 21659, "percent_yes": 29.54430029087215, "percent_no": 70.45569970912786, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.860836", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.687200", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall amendments to the Residental Growth Management Plan (also know as the Growth Management Ordinance) be adopted to allow an annual allocation of up to 600 Residental Growth Allotments (\"RGAs\") and residental building permits (\"permits\") to the Tracy Hills Community Area, and the exclusion of those RGAs and permits from the existing annual allocation calculation, subject to dedication of proposed fees and applicable development regulations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8672, "fingerprint": "2004|200400542|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400542|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "1f7e218ed4b4c84b", "measure_id": "200400542", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan and the Residential Growth Management Ordinance be amended to: allow 250 residential building permits (\"permits\") in 2004 and 2005 for the Bowtie Property and Ellis Transit Village from the existing annual allocation; and, if this measure recieves more votes, shall it nullify Measure \"U\".", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9297, "no_votes": 12419, "total_votes": 21716, "percent_yes": 42.81175170381285, "percent_no": 57.18824829618715, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.861123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.687392", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan and the Residential Growth Management Ordinance be amended to: allow 250 residential building permits (\"permits\") in 2004 and 2005 for the Bowtie Property and Ellis Transit Village from the existing annual allocation; and, if this measure recieves more votes, shall it nullify Measure \"U\".", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8669, "fingerprint": "2004|200400539|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400539|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "8614b9ab5aec71a5", "measure_id": "200400539", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent/reduce gang and drug-related crimes; improve the responsiveness of hazardous material/bomb squads; expand neighborhood-based policing with foot and bike patrols; provide additional firefighters, paramedics, police, and school resource officers; increase patrols around school and parks; and improve police/firefighter training, shall the City of Stockton enact a one-quarter cent sales tax with a citizen's oversight committee and independent annual finanical audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50429, "no_votes": 17848, "total_votes": 68277, "percent_yes": 73.8594255752303, "percent_no": 26.140574424769696, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.860254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.686817", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent/reduce gang and drug-related crimes; improve the responsiveness of hazardous material/bomb squads; expand neighborhood-based policing with foot and bike patrols; provide additional firefighters, paramedics, police, and school resource officers; increase patrols around school and parks; and improve police/firefighter training, shall the City of Stockton enact a one-quarter cent sales tax with a citizen's oversight committee and independent annual finanical audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8670, "fingerprint": "2004|200400540|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400540|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "d1d32048f07a86a4", "measure_id": "200400540", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Stockton's General Plan be amended to include an area in Southeast Stockton (generally bounded by State Highway 4 to the north, Kaiser Road to the east, Arch Road to the South, and the existing Stocktion city linits to the west) within an Urban Growth Boundary, if one is established?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44924, "no_votes": 21470, "total_votes": 66394, "percent_yes": 67.66274060909119, "percent_no": 32.33725939090881, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.860544", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.687006", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Stockton's General Plan be amended to include an area in Southeast Stockton (generally bounded by State Highway 4 to the north, Kaiser Road to the east, Arch Road to the South, and the existing Stocktion city linits to the west) within an Urban Growth Boundary, if one is established?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8665, "fingerprint": "2004|200400534|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400534|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "af236b610dfa3ff1", "measure_id": "200400534", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No.1269, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Manteca Adding Section 3.60 to the Manteca Municipal Code Enacting a Special Public Safety Parcel Tax be Adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3247, "no_votes": 13151, "total_votes": 16398, "percent_yes": 19.80119526771557, "percent_no": 80.19880473228443, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.858761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.685859", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No.1269, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Manteca Adding Section 3.60 to the Manteca Municipal Code Enacting a Special Public Safety Parcel Tax be Adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8666, "fingerprint": "2004|200400535|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400535|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "7c857cc3e775d8ae", "measure_id": "200400535", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1270, Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Manteca Imposing a 0.25% Transactions and Use (Sales) Tax to be Administered by the State Board of Equalization be Adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3595, "no_votes": 12834, "total_votes": 16429, "percent_yes": 21.88203785988191, "percent_no": 78.1179621401181, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.859050", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.686049", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1270, Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Manteca Imposing a 0.25% Transactions and Use (Sales) Tax to be Administered by the State Board of Equalization be Adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8679, "fingerprint": "2004|200400209|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400209|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "20e58b4c133fd23a", "measure_id": "200400209", "measure_letter": "A-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Lucia Mar Unified School District repair, upgrade, equip and construct school facilities at Arroyo Grande High School, including the school library and restrooms, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate technology, install energy efficient heating/ventilation systems, classrooms, cafeterias, plumbing, qualify for State matching funds, reduce overcrowding, by issuing $21,350,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure that no bond money is wasted or used for administrator's salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13848, "no_votes": 8021, "total_votes": 21869, "percent_yes": 63.32251131738992, "percent_no": 36.67748868261008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.863321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.688723", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Lucia Mar Unified School District repair, upgrade, equip and construct school facilities at Arroyo Grande High School, including the school library and restrooms, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate technology, install energy efficient heating/ventilation systems, classrooms, cafeterias, plumbing, qualify for State matching funds, reduce overcrowding, by issuing $21,350,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure that no bond money is wasted or used for administrator's salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8676, "fingerprint": "2004|200400112|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400112|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "e93b931eefc1cdb4", "measure_id": "200400112", "measure_letter": "C-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a Mayor, commencing with the election in November 2004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2215, "no_votes": 818, "total_votes": 3033, "percent_yes": 73.03000329706562, "percent_no": 26.96999670293438, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.862465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.688156", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a Mayor, commencing with the election in November 2004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8677, "fingerprint": "2004|200400113|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400113|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "15164edd396382ed", "measure_id": "200400113", "measure_letter": "D-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of the Mayor be two (2) years, commencing with the election in 2004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2052, "no_votes": 887, "total_votes": 2939, "percent_yes": 69.8196665532494, "percent_no": 30.180333446750595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.862751", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.688342", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of the Mayor be two (2) years, commencing with the election in 2004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8678, "fingerprint": "2004|200400114|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400114|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "af8f89c193461d21", "measure_id": "200400114", "measure_letter": "E-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of the Mayor be four (4) years, commencing with the election in 2004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 703, "no_votes": 2110, "total_votes": 2813, "percent_yes": 24.991112691077134, "percent_no": 75.00888730892287, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.863035", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.688532", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of the Mayor be four (4) years, commencing with the election in 2004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8675, "fingerprint": "2004|200400111|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400111|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "16b4baa9a1f31f6b", "measure_id": "200400111", "measure_letter": "F-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Municipal Code be amended to replace city-wide council elections with district elections whereby each of the five members of the City Council is elected by a separate district and change the Mayor from an elected office to a rotation among elected council members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 965, "no_votes": 3094, "total_votes": 4059, "percent_yes": 23.77432865237743, "percent_no": 76.22567134762257, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.862114", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.687969", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Municipal Code be amended to replace city-wide council elections with district elections whereby each of the five members of the City Council is elected by a separate district and change the Mayor from an elected office to a rotation among elected council members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8681, "fingerprint": "2004|200400258|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400258|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "43229d4e7ca3d873", "measure_id": "200400258", "measure_letter": "G-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure G-04 be approved, which rescinds the current Special Tax and implements a new Special Tax for fire protection, paramedic rescue, emergency response, and other services relating to the protection of lives and property for the benefit of the residents of Los Osos as detailed in Ordinance 2003-04?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2294, "no_votes": 2100, "total_votes": 4394, "percent_yes": 52.20755575785162, "percent_no": 47.79244424214838, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-05-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.863898", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.689106", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure G-04 be approved, which rescinds the current Special Tax and implements a new Special Tax for fire protection, paramedic rescue, emergency response, and other services relating to the protection of lives and property for the benefit of the residents of Los Osos as detailed in Ordinance 2003-04?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8680, "fingerprint": "2004|200400257|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400257|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "f03cce4836e53561", "measure_id": "200400257", "measure_letter": "H-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo commencing Fiscal year 2004/2005, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within County Service Area No. 9, Zone 1, to provide emergency fire and medical response services within said area, set at an initial rate of forty-two dollars ($42.00) per benefit unit, to be increased each year thereafter not more than the increase specified in the full text of the proposition?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 74, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 101, "percent_yes": 73.26732673267327, "percent_no": 26.73267326732673, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-05-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.863611", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.688914", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo commencing Fiscal year 2004/2005, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within County Service Area No. 9, Zone 1, to provide emergency fire and medical response services within said area, set at an initial rate of forty-two dollars ($42.00) per benefit unit, to be increased each year thereafter not more than the increase specified in the full text of the proposition?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8684, "fingerprint": "2004|200400338|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400338|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "958910b5caef7aed", "measure_id": "200400338", "measure_letter": "L-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 3027 of the County of San Luis Obispo be approved to increase the countywide sales tax by one-quarter percent as a transactions and use tax and a special tax to provide needed funds for countywide local library operations including maintenance and repair of library facilities, restoring and protecting funding for books and materials, increasing open hours, and restoring and protecting services and programs for children, young adults, and older adults?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57738, "no_votes": 62572, "total_votes": 120310, "percent_yes": 47.99102319009226, "percent_no": 52.00897680990774, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.864790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.689677", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 3027 of the County of San Luis Obispo be approved to increase the countywide sales tax by one-quarter percent as a transactions and use tax and a special tax to provide needed funds for countywide local library operations including maintenance and repair of library facilities, restoring and protecting funding for books and materials, increasing open hours, and restoring and protecting services and programs for children, young adults, and older adults?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8682, "fingerprint": "2004|200400336|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400336|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "5765d3b07c685417", "measure_id": "200400336", "measure_letter": "M-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a reorganization be approved to dissolve County Service Area #10, the Cayucos Sanitary District and the Cayucos Fire Protection District and to form in their place the Cayucos Community Services District, subject to conditions imposed be the Local Agency Formation Commission?  If the proposed Cayucos Community Services District is created, please choose five (5) persons to represent your district as a member of the Board of Directors.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 253, "no_votes": 1478, "total_votes": 1731, "percent_yes": 14.6158290005777, "percent_no": 85.3841709994223, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.864188", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.689297", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a reorganization be approved to dissolve County Service Area #10, the Cayucos Sanitary District and the Cayucos Fire Protection District and to form in their place the Cayucos Community Services District, subject to conditions imposed be the Local Agency Formation Commission?  If the proposed Cayucos Community Services District is created, please choose five (5) persons to represent your district as a member of the Board of Directors.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8683, "fingerprint": "2004|200400337|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400337|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "1864178d13ef3fe0", "measure_id": "200400337", "measure_letter": "N-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "If Measure M-04 is approved, shall the initial appropriations limit for the Cayucos Community Services District, in accordance with Article XIII B of the California Constitution, be set at an established amount not to exceed the combined 2003-04 appropriations limits for the three dissolving Districts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 849, "no_votes": 592, "total_votes": 1441, "percent_yes": 58.9174184594032, "percent_no": 41.0825815405968, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.864473", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.689485", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If Measure M-04 is approved, shall the initial appropriations limit for the Cayucos Community Services District, in accordance with Article XIII B of the California Constitution, be set at an established amount not to exceed the combined 2003-04 appropriations limits for the three dissolving Districts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8686, "fingerprint": "2004|200400543|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400543|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "8b7abb89f729f24b", "measure_id": "200400543", "measure_letter": "O-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to validate and reenact the City of Grover Beach's existing Utility Users Tax at its current rate and to require voter approval before the rate of that tax may be increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4120, "no_votes": 903, "total_votes": 5023, "percent_yes": 82.0226956002389, "percent_no": 17.977304399761096, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.865543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.690058", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to validate and reenact the City of Grover Beach's existing Utility Users Tax at its current rate and to require voter approval before the rate of that tax may be increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8687, "fingerprint": "2004|200400673|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400673|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "8be5aa99112837d3", "measure_id": "200400673", "measure_letter": "P-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace old portable classrooms with new classrooms; construct a multipurpose school and community center for athletics and performing arts; renovate a library for school and community, shall the Cayucos Elementary School District be authorized to replace, renovate, acquire and construct school facilities and equipment and issue $4,950,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1316, "no_votes": 577, "total_votes": 1893, "percent_yes": 69.51928156365558, "percent_no": 30.480718436344418, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.865841", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.690246", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace old portable classrooms with new classrooms; construct a multipurpose school and community center for athletics and performing arts; renovate a library for school and community, shall the Cayucos Elementary School District be authorized to replace, renovate, acquire and construct school facilities and equipment and issue $4,950,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8685, "fingerprint": "2004|200400339|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400339|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "c9e96f6a6859a123", "measure_id": "200400339", "measure_letter": "Q-04", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted prohibiting the growing of genetically engineered organisms in San Luis Obispo County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49910, "no_votes": 71446, "total_votes": 121356, "percent_yes": 41.12693233132272, "percent_no": 58.87306766867728, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.865172", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.689871", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted prohibiting the growing of genetically engineered organisms in San Luis Obispo County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8689, "fingerprint": "2004|200400046|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400046|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0831bdb5a4a61b24", "measure_id": "200400046", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART; (B) New transbay commuter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network; (D) New expanded ferry service; (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail. (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 81381, "no_votes": 65986, "total_votes": 147367, "percent_yes": 55.22335393948442, "percent_no": 44.77664606051558, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.866456", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.690625", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART; (B) New transbay commuter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network; (D) New expanded ferry service; (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail. (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11855, "fingerprint": "2004|200400340|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400340|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8ae2c25257f51200", "measure_id": "200400340", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall San Mateo County Ordinance No. 04223 THE SAN MATEO COUNTY SAFE ROADS, TRAFFIC RELIEF AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MEASURE be approved: to repair neighborhood streets; expand senior and paratransit services; improve Caltrain; construct bicycle/pedestrian paths; support the existing BART service; assist water transport; reduce congestion; Shall the Transportation Authority extend the current 1/2 cent sales/use tax for 25 years, implement the county Expenditure Plan and issue limited tax bonds not exceeding proceeds, with no increase in taxes, and with citizen participation and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 186480, "no_votes": 59973, "total_votes": 246453, "percent_yes": 75.66554272011297, "percent_no": 24.334457279887033, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.819247", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.867422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.691204", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall San Mateo County Ordinance No. 04223 THE SAN MATEO COUNTY SAFE ROADS, TRAFFIC RELIEF AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MEASURE be approved: to repair neighborhood streets; expand senior and paratransit services; improve Caltrain; construct bicycle/pedestrian paths; support the existing BART service; assist water transport; reduce congestion; Shall the Transportation Authority extend the current 1/2 cent sales/use tax for 25 years, implement the county Expenditure Plan and issue limited tax bonds not exceeding proceeds, with no increase in taxes, and with citizen participation and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8688, "fingerprint": "2004|200400045|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400045|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "82a263c0f0997a7e", "measure_id": "200400045", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 066343 of the County of San Mateo imposing an annual special tax for fire protection and extended police services according to the schedule therein be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1064, "no_votes": 436, "total_votes": 1500, "percent_yes": 70.93333333333334, "percent_no": 29.066666666666663, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.866129", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.690434", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 066343 of the County of San Mateo imposing an annual special tax for fire protection and extended police services according to the schedule therein be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11856, "fingerprint": "2004|200400341|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400341|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7e69ae4e3bc8c96d", "measure_id": "200400341", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should Section 501 of the County Charter be amended to require that personnel appointments serve the County's diverse population and to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability or sexual orientation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 164843, "no_votes": 66730, "total_votes": 231573, "percent_yes": 71.18403268083931, "percent_no": 28.81596731916069, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.819447", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.867760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.691394", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Section 501 of the County Charter be amended to require that personnel appointments serve the County's diverse population and to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability or sexual orientation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8691, "fingerprint": "2004|200400211|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400211|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "dd16081ffa39de63", "measure_id": "200400211", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve student's reading writing, math, and science skills by retaining experienced, highly qualified teachers and support staff; and by supporting supplemental educational programs and services, shall the Ravenswood City School District levy an annual parcel tax of $98 for five (5) years, beginning July 1, 2004; and increase the District's total appropriations limit annually according to statute, with annual citizens' oversight committee audits and with exemptions available to individuals aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1683, "no_votes": 570, "total_votes": 2253, "percent_yes": 74.70039946737683, "percent_no": 25.299600532623174, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.867132", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.691011", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve student's reading writing, math, and science skills by retaining experienced, highly qualified teachers and support staff; and by supporting supplemental educational programs and services, shall the Ravenswood City School District levy an annual parcel tax of $98 for five (5) years, beginning July 1, 2004; and increase the District's total appropriations limit annually according to statute, with annual citizens' oversight committee audits and with exemptions available to individuals aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11857, "fingerprint": "2004|200400342|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400342|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4bdc4cae7b7cd7c1", "measure_id": "200400342", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Section 303 of the County Charter be amended to remove the requirement that the appointment of an Acting County Manager must be an existing County officer or employee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 135545, "no_votes": 85992, "total_votes": 221537, "percent_yes": 61.18391058829901, "percent_no": 38.81608941170099, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.819647", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.868051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.691586", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 303 of the County Charter be amended to remove the requirement that the appointment of an Acting County Manager must be an existing County officer or employee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8690, "fingerprint": "2004|200400210|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400210|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4770615cc02268d4", "measure_id": "200400210", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain educational excellence, emphasizing science, reading, writing, and math instruction; attract and retain qualified, experienced teachers; and provide necessary educational  programs and materials; shall the Portola Valley Elementary School District be authorized to continue and increase the existing annual special tax to $290 per parcel for 10 years beginning July 1, 2004 and adjust the appropriations limit annually according to statute; provide annual citizen oversight and allow exemptions for those 65 years and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2302, "no_votes": 849, "total_votes": 3151, "percent_yes": 73.0561726436052, "percent_no": 26.943827356394806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.866804", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.690817", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain educational excellence, emphasizing science, reading, writing, and math instruction; attract and retain qualified, experienced teachers; and provide necessary educational  programs and materials; shall the Portola Valley Elementary School District be authorized to continue and increase the existing annual special tax to $290 per parcel for 10 years beginning July 1, 2004 and adjust the appropriations limit annually according to statute; provide annual citizen oversight and allow exemptions for those 65 years and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8692, "fingerprint": "2004|200400343|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400343|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c240d957caac996b", "measure_id": "200400343", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should Sections 502b(3) and 502b(4) of the County Charter be amended to limit the unclassified status of persons employed for professional, scientific, technical, expert services or associated services on a temporary basis for a specific project to three consecutive years and to delete part time physicians from unclassified service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 123730, "no_votes": 82995, "total_votes": 206725, "percent_yes": 59.8524609989116, "percent_no": 40.1475390010884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.868337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.691807", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Sections 502b(3) and 502b(4) of the County Charter be amended to limit the unclassified status of persons employed for professional, scientific, technical, expert services or associated services on a temporary basis for a specific project to three consecutive years and to delete part time physicians from unclassified service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8693, "fingerprint": "2004|200400344|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400344|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fdbbb544df6e8cfe", "measure_id": "200400344", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Section 206a(5) of the County Charter be amended to provide that the Board of Supervisors may annually request that the Grand Jury investigate and recommend on the need for an adjustment in the compensation for Supervisors, the Board of Supervisors may accept and or reject the recommendation but in no event may it set its compensation at an amount above the recommendation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 104609, "no_votes": 113415, "total_votes": 218024, "percent_yes": 47.98049755990166, "percent_no": 52.01950244009834, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.868665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.691998", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 206a(5) of the County Charter be amended to provide that the Board of Supervisors may annually request that the Grand Jury investigate and recommend on the need for an adjustment in the compensation for Supervisors, the Board of Supervisors may accept and or reject the recommendation but in no event may it set its compensation at an amount above the recommendation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8704, "fingerprint": "2004|200400674|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400674|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "82a2993463b6e430", "measure_id": "200400674", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve academic performance and student achievement, emphasizing reading, writing, math, science, and music; attract and retain experienced, qualified teachers; support small class size; provide reading specialists for at-risk children; and preserve school library services, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary Schools District collect $96/year per taxable parcel for ten years, with all funds staying in local schools, independent community oversight of all expenditures, exemptions for those 65 and older, and new funds used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11825, "no_votes": 5897, "total_votes": 17722, "percent_yes": 66.72497460783208, "percent_no": 33.27502539216792, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.872432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.694169", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve academic performance and student achievement, emphasizing reading, writing, math, science, and music; attract and retain experienced, qualified teachers; support small class size; provide reading specialists for at-risk children; and preserve school library services, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary Schools District collect $96/year per taxable parcel for ten years, with all funds staying in local schools, independent community oversight of all expenditures, exemptions for those 65 and older, and new funds used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8706, "fingerprint": "2004|200400676|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400676|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "54a2548590d034c3", "measure_id": "200400676", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue the modernization, improvement and expansion of classrooms and facilities for school and community use at local high schools, including Carlmont, Menlo-Atherton, Sequoia and Woodside, shall the Sequoia Union High School district be authorized to issue $70 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to repair, replace, acquire, renovate, construct, furnish and equip schools facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63187, "no_votes": 27975, "total_votes": 91162, "percent_yes": 69.31287159123319, "percent_no": 30.68712840876681, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.873027", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.694545", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue the modernization, improvement and expansion of classrooms and facilities for school and community use at local high schools, including Carlmont, Menlo-Atherton, Sequoia and Woodside, shall the Sequoia Union High School district be authorized to issue $70 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to repair, replace, acquire, renovate, construct, furnish and equip schools facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8702, "fingerprint": "2004|200400552|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400552|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7d87cb46e3c014b9", "measure_id": "200400552", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of South San Francisco be authorized to add a one percent (1%) increment on the existing hotel tax imposed from 8% of the room rate to 9% of the room rate, with the revenue from said increment reserved for park, recreation, library and public safety services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12554, "no_votes": 5391, "total_votes": 17945, "percent_yes": 69.95820562830872, "percent_no": 30.04179437169128, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.871749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.693782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of South San Francisco be authorized to add a one percent (1%) increment on the existing hotel tax imposed from 8% of the room rate to 9% of the room rate, with the revenue from said increment reserved for park, recreation, library and public safety services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8703, "fingerprint": "2004|200400553|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400553|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "415c4c0297bded7f", "measure_id": "200400553", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of South San Francisco be authorized to collect a business license tax from owners and operators of commercial billboards located within the City equal to eight percent (8%) of the gross receipts received from such advertising with the revenue from the tax specifically reserved for park, recreation, library and public safety services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11841, "no_votes": 6129, "total_votes": 17970, "percent_yes": 65.89315525876461, "percent_no": 34.10684474123539, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.872133", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.693977", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of South San Francisco be authorized to collect a business license tax from owners and operators of commercial billboards located within the City equal to eight percent (8%) of the gross receipts received from such advertising with the revenue from the tax specifically reserved for park, recreation, library and public safety services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8698, "fingerprint": "2004|200400548|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400548|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ff3b39d2bfdd40cc", "measure_id": "200400548", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ordinance No. 11.2004A regarding historic preservation of the Little Brown Church be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10319, "no_votes": 5082, "total_votes": 15401, "percent_yes": 67.00214271800532, "percent_no": 32.99785728199468, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.870386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.692939", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ordinance No. 11.2004A regarding historic preservation of the Little Brown Church be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8699, "fingerprint": "2004|200400549|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400549|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "812b4c5400a8bc0d", "measure_id": "200400549", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall ordinance No. 11.2004B, known as the \"Little Brown Church Historical Landmark Initiative\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8809, "no_votes": 6424, "total_votes": 15233, "percent_yes": 57.82839887087244, "percent_no": 42.17160112912756, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.870681", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.693125", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall ordinance No. 11.2004B, known as the \"Little Brown Church Historical Landmark Initiative\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8695, "fingerprint": "2004|200400545|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400545|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0043c25221bc4232", "measure_id": "200400545", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Daly City Ordinance No. 1309, which would authorize the City of Daly City to impose and collect a one-quarter of one percent sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for general government purposes, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8335, "no_votes": 15467, "total_votes": 23802, "percent_yes": 35.01806570876397, "percent_no": 64.98193429123603, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.869368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.692379", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Daly City Ordinance No. 1309, which would authorize the City of Daly City to impose and collect a one-quarter of one percent sales tax (Transactions and Use Tax) for general government purposes, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8696, "fingerprint": "2004|200400546|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400546|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0036a75a04afbb47", "measure_id": "200400546", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Daly City Business License Tax Ordinance be amended to increase the business license tax in order to raise monies for general fund purposes such as, but not limited to police, fire, parks, libraries and recreation programs that might otherwise be reduced due to the loss of other local tax revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12638, "no_votes": 11201, "total_votes": 23839, "percent_yes": 53.01396870674105, "percent_no": 46.98603129325895, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.869763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.692564", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Daly City Business License Tax Ordinance be amended to increase the business license tax in order to raise monies for general fund purposes such as, but not limited to police, fire, parks, libraries and recreation programs that might otherwise be reduced due to the loss of other local tax revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8694, "fingerprint": "2004|200400544|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400544|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a8cf0ca9cadb270c", "measure_id": "200400544", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance of the Town of Atherton Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax for Municipal Services and Capital Improvements and for the Expenditure of Funds Derived from Such Tax,\" and numbered 550 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2174, "no_votes": 1626, "total_votes": 3800, "percent_yes": 57.21052631578948, "percent_no": 42.78947368421052, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.868995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.692190", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance of the Town of Atherton Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax for Municipal Services and Capital Improvements and for the Expenditure of Funds Derived from Such Tax,\" and numbered 550 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8701, "fingerprint": "2004|200400551|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400551|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a795037267d2d0ec", "measure_id": "200400551", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City of San Mateo's General Plan to maintain policies on building heights, residential densities, commercial and office square footage, and affordable housing originally adopted by city voters in 1991, subject to certain and specified revisions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17151, "no_votes": 7826, "total_votes": 24977, "percent_yes": 68.6671737998959, "percent_no": 31.332826200104094, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.871343", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.693505", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to amend the City of San Mateo's General Plan to maintain policies on building heights, residential densities, commercial and office square footage, and affordable housing originally adopted by city voters in 1991, subject to certain and specified revisions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8700, "fingerprint": "2004|200400550|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400550|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "fc85ddf5393b6c2c", "measure_id": "200400550", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1130-332, which was unanimously passed by the City Council, and that rezones property located at Peninsula Marina, Pete's Harbor, and adjacent roadway parcels, to a Planned Community District to allow a combination of uses including residential, commercial, marinas, parks and open space, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12651, "no_votes": 15057, "total_votes": 27708, "percent_yes": 45.65829363360762, "percent_no": 54.34170636639238, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.871047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.693317", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1130-332, which was unanimously passed by the City Council, and that rezones property located at Peninsula Marina, Pete's Harbor, and adjacent roadway parcels, to a Planned Community District to allow a combination of uses including residential, commercial, marinas, parks and open space, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8697, "fingerprint": "2004|200400547|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400547|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "1e8c06515f05e648", "measure_id": "200400547", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall East Palo Alto's business license tax regulations be amended to create a new category for hazardous waste disposal facilities, and to impose thereon a 10% gross receipts tax, which shall be used for general governmental purposes such as public safety, parks and recreation, street maintenance, senior citizen programs, and central administration; and shall expenditure limitations be modified to permit East Palo Alto to spend such revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3615, "no_votes": 1160, "total_votes": 4775, "percent_yes": 75.70680628272251, "percent_no": 24.29319371727749, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.870094", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.692752", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall East Palo Alto's business license tax regulations be amended to create a new category for hazardous waste disposal facilities, and to impose thereon a 10% gross receipts tax, which shall be used for general governmental purposes such as public safety, parks and recreation, street maintenance, senior citizen programs, and central administration; and shall expenditure limitations be modified to permit East Palo Alto to spend such revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8705, "fingerprint": "2004|200400675|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400675|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0316422b1b20408b", "measure_id": "200400675", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Burlingame School District extend without increase for six years its existing local education tax of $104 per parcel that is due to expire in 2005 in order to protect small class sizes, retain quality teachers, support reading programs and school libraries, provide classroom instructional supplies and support high quality education, with all expenditures monitored by an independent volunteer oversight committee and exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9756, "no_votes": 2709, "total_votes": 12465, "percent_yes": 78.26714801444044, "percent_no": 21.732851985559563, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.872737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.694357", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Burlingame School District extend without increase for six years its existing local education tax of $104 per parcel that is due to expire in 2005 in order to protect small class sizes, retain quality teachers, support reading programs and school libraries, provide classroom instructional supplies and support high quality education, with all expenditures monitored by an independent volunteer oversight committee and exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8714, "fingerprint": "2004|200400556|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400556|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "1e78478c183f53e9", "measure_id": "200400556", "measure_letter": "A2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the annual salary of members of the City Council be set at eighty percent (80%) of the annual Area Median Income (based on a one-person household) for Santa Barbara County (currently $36,240) and the annual salary of the Mayor be set at one hundred percent (100%) of the annual Area Median Income (based on a one-person household) for Santa Barbara County (currently $45,300)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19078, "no_votes": 16476, "total_votes": 35554, "percent_yes": 53.65922259098836, "percent_no": 46.34077740901164, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.875537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.696092", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the annual salary of members of the City Council be set at eighty percent (80%) of the annual Area Median Income (based on a one-person household) for Santa Barbara County (currently $36,240) and the annual salary of the Mayor be set at one hundred percent (100%) of the annual Area Median Income (based on a one-person household) for Santa Barbara County (currently $45,300)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8715, "fingerprint": "2004|200400557|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400557|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "3871ba2174c58471", "measure_id": "200400557", "measure_letter": "B2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the eligibility requirements for the nine member City Architectural Board of Review be changed in order to allow up to four (4) members of the Architectural Board of Review to be non-residents of the City of Santa Barbara?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11176, "no_votes": 24063, "total_votes": 35239, "percent_yes": 31.71486137518091, "percent_no": 68.2851386248191, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.875864", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.696275", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the eligibility requirements for the nine member City Architectural Board of Review be changed in order to allow up to four (4) members of the Architectural Board of Review to be non-residents of the City of Santa Barbara?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8718, "fingerprint": "2004|200400678|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400678|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "38a7f4554e9da5ef", "measure_id": "200400678", "measure_letter": "C2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall Santa Maria Joint Union High School District be authorized to construct a new high school to alleviate student overcrowding; upgrade classrooms; improve healht/safety; provide additional access to computer technology; replace portable classrooms with permanent construction; acquire, construct and improve school facilities; and make the District eligible for approximately $30,000,000 in State grants by issuing $79,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22527, "no_votes": 15818, "total_votes": 38345, "percent_yes": 58.748207067414256, "percent_no": 41.251792932585744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.876771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.696821", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall Santa Maria Joint Union High School District be authorized to construct a new high school to alleviate student overcrowding; upgrade classrooms; improve healht/safety; provide additional access to computer technology; replace portable classrooms with permanent construction; acquire, construct and improve school facilities; and make the District eligible for approximately $30,000,000 in State grants by issuing $79,000,000 in bonds within legal rates, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8707, "fingerprint": "2004|200400115|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400115|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d7000555de148954", "measure_id": "200400115", "measure_letter": "R2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Goleta be elected BY districts established in Ordinance No.04-01E?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2821, "no_votes": 4529, "total_votes": 7350, "percent_yes": 38.38095238095238, "percent_no": 61.61904761904762, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.873316", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.694740", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Goleta be elected BY districts established in Ordinance No.04-01E?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8708, "fingerprint": "2004|200400116|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400116|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "1fef777f335a47ac", "measure_id": "200400116", "measure_letter": "S2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Goleta be elected FROM districts as established in Ordinanace No.04-02E?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2988, "no_votes": 4370, "total_votes": 7358, "percent_yes": 40.60886110356075, "percent_no": 59.39113889643925, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.873684", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.694931", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Goleta be elected FROM districts as established in Ordinanace No.04-02E?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8709, "fingerprint": "2004|200400117|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400117|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "10fa549fa10d501b", "measure_id": "200400117", "measure_letter": "T2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall establishment of electoral districts by Ordinances 04-01E or 04-02E be rejected and members of the legislative body of the City of Goleta continue to be elected AT LARGE?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4340, "no_votes": 3270, "total_votes": 7610, "percent_yes": 57.03022339027596, "percent_no": 42.96977660972404, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.874006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.695117", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall establishment of electoral districts by Ordinances 04-01E or 04-02E be rejected and members of the legislative body of the City of Goleta continue to be elected AT LARGE?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8710, "fingerprint": "2004|200400212|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400212|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d445e538d69c1f63", "measure_id": "200400212", "measure_letter": "U2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational quality, shall Buelton Union School District be authorized to complete construction of Oak Valley School as well as upgrade and modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, upgrade systems to improve access to computers and modern technology, renovate Jonata Schools multipurpose room and make the District eligible for $3.7 million in State grants by issuing $6.5 million in bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, citizens oversight committee and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1176, "no_votes": 729, "total_votes": 1905, "percent_yes": 61.732283464566926, "percent_no": 38.267716535433074, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.874296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.695303", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational quality, shall Buelton Union School District be authorized to complete construction of Oak Valley School as well as upgrade and modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, upgrade systems to improve access to computers and modern technology, renovate Jonata Schools multipurpose room and make the District eligible for $3.7 million in State grants by issuing $6.5 million in bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, citizens oversight committee and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8711, "fingerprint": "2004|200400213|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400213|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "92845c9d56b0f10e", "measure_id": "200400213", "measure_letter": "V2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowded classrooms by building more high schools; acquire land; repair and renovate aging electrical and plumbing systems; become eligible for millions in State matching funds; provide computer and science labs; improve student safety; all through a comprehensive plan; shall Santa Maria Joint Union High School District issue $98 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits with no bond money used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12894, "no_votes": 12500, "total_votes": 25394, "percent_yes": 50.77577380483579, "percent_no": 49.22422619516421, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.874585", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.695498", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowded classrooms by building more high schools; acquire land; repair and renovate aging electrical and plumbing systems; become eligible for millions in State matching funds; provide computer and science labs; improve student safety; all through a comprehensive plan; shall Santa Maria Joint Union High School District issue $98 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits with no bond money used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8716, "fingerprint": "2004|200400558|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400558|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "93396441a8f57314", "measure_id": "200400558", "measure_letter": "W2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Maria adopt an ordinance requiring that substances added to the public water supply for purposes other than to make water safe satisfy two new standards: 1) approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for specified purposes; and 2) cannot contain contaminants at concentrations exceeding either the U.S. Maximum Contaminant Level Goals or California Public Health Goals, whichever is more protective?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9651, "no_votes": 10070, "total_votes": 19721, "percent_yes": 48.93768064499771, "percent_no": 51.06231935500229, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.876153", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.696459", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Maria adopt an ordinance requiring that substances added to the public water supply for purposes other than to make water safe satisfy two new standards: 1) approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for specified purposes; and 2) cannot contain contaminants at concentrations exceeding either the U.S. Maximum Contaminant Level Goals or California Public Health Goals, whichever is more protective?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8712, "fingerprint": "2004|200400554|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400554|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "1ba67b47027b4f13", "measure_id": "200400554", "measure_letter": "X2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should an Ordinance be adopted approving a new section 1.16.020 to be added to the Buellton Municipal Code to require a public vote on all City of Buellton taxes, in order of age, the oldest first, by placing one on each General Election ballot until all have been reconsidered and approved by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 605, "no_votes": 1302, "total_votes": 1907, "percent_yes": 31.72522286313581, "percent_no": 68.27477713686419, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.874874", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.695719", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should an Ordinance be adopted approving a new section 1.16.020 to be added to the Buellton Municipal Code to require a public vote on all City of Buellton taxes, in order of age, the oldest first, by placing one on each General Election ballot until all have been reconsidered and approved by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8713, "fingerprint": "2004|200400555|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400555|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "e985ee7a33e0abd3", "measure_id": "200400555", "measure_letter": "Y2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the permanent annual appropriations limit of the City of Goleta be set at $22,545,410?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6659, "no_votes": 3973, "total_votes": 10632, "percent_yes": 62.63167795334839, "percent_no": 37.36832204665161, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.875162", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.695907", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the permanent annual appropriations limit of the City of Goleta be set at $22,545,410?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8717, "fingerprint": "2004|200400677|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400677|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "ade24a872248e1c8", "measure_id": "200400677", "measure_letter": "Z2004", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall College School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and school facilities including replacing roofs, upgrading outdated electrical, plumbing and sewer systems, making health and safety improvements; replacing portable classrooms, increasing student access to computers and technology, and making the District ellgible for $1,500,000 in State grants by issuing $9,370,000 in bonds within legal limits, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2028, "no_votes": 1243, "total_votes": 3271, "percent_yes": 61.9993885661877, "percent_no": 38.0006114338123, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.876442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.696640", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall College School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and school facilities including replacing roofs, upgrading outdated electrical, plumbing and sewer systems, making health and safety improvements; replacing portable classrooms, increasing student access to computers and technology, and making the District ellgible for $1,500,000 in State grants by issuing $9,370,000 in bonds within legal limits, with a citizens' oversight committee, annual audits, and NO money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8719, "fingerprint": "2004|200400047|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400047|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "eee590cbefe7ced6", "measure_id": "200400047", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART; (B) New transbay commuter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network; (D) New expandend ferry service; (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail; (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in teh bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 178540, "no_votes": 121231, "total_votes": 299771, "percent_yes": 59.55879654803167, "percent_no": 40.44120345196833, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.877166", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.697003", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following: (1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART; (B) New transbay commuter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge; (C) Comprehensive Regional Express bus network; (D) New expandend ferry service; (E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail; (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in teh bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11859, "fingerprint": "2004|200400345|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400345|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8adb030fe2e6c2ce", "measure_id": "200400345", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the \"prevailing wage\" provisions of the Santa Clara County Charter, which have been interpreted by courts to mean base pay only and to require comparisons to private sector employees, be amended so County rates of pay will be based on comparisons only to public sector employees and, \"wages\" and \"rates of pay\" will mean base pay and employer-paid contributions for employee benefits, such as medical, dental, and retirement plans?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 237162, "no_votes": 247047, "total_votes": 484209, "percent_yes": 48.97926308680755, "percent_no": 51.02073691319245, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.829926", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.880357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.698822", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \"prevailing wage\" provisions of the Santa Clara County Charter, which have been interpreted by courts to mean base pay only and to require comparisons to private sector employees, be amended so County rates of pay will be based on comparisons only to public sector employees and, \"wages\" and \"rates of pay\" will mean base pay and employer-paid contributions for employee benefits, such as medical, dental, and retirement plans?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11858, "fingerprint": "2004|200400278|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400278|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "80f4205d08c8e971", "measure_id": "200400278", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on March 18, 2004, by the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos the territory described in that order and designated as Blossom Hill Manor No. 11, be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22, "no_votes": 37, "total_votes": 59, "percent_yes": 37.28813559322034, "percent_no": 62.71186440677966, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-31", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.829404", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.880018", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.698638", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on March 18, 2004, by the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos the territory described in that order and designated as Blossom Hill Manor No. 11, be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8720, "fingerprint": "2004|200400048|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400048|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f71b768151220318", "measure_id": "200400048", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve safety and conditions for children at Juvenile Hall, based on independent audit recommendations, shall supervisors establish an Advisory Board of Juvenile Hall to include: a Juvenile court judge, the District Attorney, Public Defender, Sheriff, health professionals, Probation employee organization members, previous Hall residents, and parents of persons incarcerated at Juvenile Hall AND shall the County Charter be amended to allow the County Excecutive to appoint, supervise, and remove the Chief Probation Officer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 177293, "no_votes": 116042, "total_votes": 293335, "percent_yes": 60.44045204288612, "percent_no": 39.55954795711388, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.877501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.697184", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety and conditions for children at Juvenile Hall, based on independent audit recommendations, shall supervisors establish an Advisory Board of Juvenile Hall to include: a Juvenile court judge, the District Attorney, Public Defender, Sheriff, health professionals, Probation employee organization members, previous Hall residents, and parents of persons incarcerated at Juvenile Hall AND shall the County Charter be amended to allow the County Excecutive to appoint, supervise, and remove the Chief Probation Officer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8728, "fingerprint": "2004|200400346|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400346|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0544c69552545528", "measure_id": "200400346", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to permit the voters to approve or disapprove decisions made by arbitrators in labor negotiation disputes after the Board of Supervisors finds that those decisions will substantially interfere with the Board's authority over the financial and employment affairs of the County or will result in greater cost than the County's last proposal during negotiation, if the Charter has been amended to require binding arbitration for labor negotiation disputes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 199467, "no_votes": 272823, "total_votes": 472290, "percent_yes": 42.23400876580067, "percent_no": 57.76599123419933, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.880742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.699004", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to permit the voters to approve or disapprove decisions made by arbitrators in labor negotiation disputes after the Board of Supervisors finds that those decisions will substantially interfere with the Board's authority over the financial and employment affairs of the County or will result in greater cost than the County's last proposal during negotiation, if the Charter has been amended to require binding arbitration for labor negotiation disputes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11860, "fingerprint": "2004|200400347|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400347|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3da4aadd9d807324", "measure_id": "200400347", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter of the County of Santa Clara be amended to supersede dispute resolution processes contained in State and County law in the event that bargaining is unsuccessful, to impose binding arbitration to resolve negotiation disputes over wages, hours or other terms and conditions of employment between the County of Santa Clara and unions representing certain County attorneys, certain officers employed by the County Department of Correction, and certain County registered nurses, who currently resolve disputes pursuant to law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 204377, "no_votes": 265498, "total_votes": 469875, "percent_yes": 43.49603617983506, "percent_no": 56.50396382016494, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.830541", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.881034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.699187", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the County of Santa Clara be amended to supersede dispute resolution processes contained in State and County law in the event that bargaining is unsuccessful, to impose binding arbitration to resolve negotiation disputes over wages, hours or other terms and conditions of employment between the County of Santa Clara and unions representing certain County attorneys, certain officers employed by the County Department of Correction, and certain County registered nurses, who currently resolve disputes pursuant to law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8721, "fingerprint": "2004|200400118|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400118|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9e53862072ff39a0", "measure_id": "200400118", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted to amend the Morgan Hill General Plan and Municpal code to update Measure P, the City's Residential Development Control System (RDCS) to extend the RDCS to 2020, establish a population ceiling of 48,000 for the year 2020 consistent with the current growth rate allowed under Measure P, and refine RDCS policies to encourage more efficient land use, sustainable transit-oriented development, and address difficulties in implementing the RDCS.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5281, "no_votes": 1657, "total_votes": 6938, "percent_yes": 76.11703660997405, "percent_no": 23.88296339002595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.877801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.697366", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted to amend the Morgan Hill General Plan and Municpal code to update Measure P, the City's Residential Development Control System (RDCS) to extend the RDCS to 2020, establish a population ceiling of 48,000 for the year 2020 consistent with the current growth rate allowed under Measure P, and refine RDCS policies to encourage more efficient land use, sustainable transit-oriented development, and address difficulties in implementing the RDCS.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11863, "fingerprint": "2004|200400688|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400688|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ba292dfe2ebcb897", "measure_id": "200400688", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the transfer of territory from Union and Campbell Union High School Districts to Los Gatos Union and Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School Districts.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 3, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.835264", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.885413", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.701730", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the transfer of territory from Union and Campbell Union High School Districts to Los Gatos Union and Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School Districts.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8722, "fingerprint": "2004|200400119|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400119|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b8a5a6a89d8573dc", "measure_id": "200400119", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "DESIGN-BUILD PROCUREMENT PROCESS:To create taxpayer savings, prevent cost overruns an improve efficiency, may the Charter be amended to allow the design-build procurement process as an expemption to public bidding, wherein the design and construction of a public works project is provided by the same entity, be utilzed for public works contracts that cost over $5,000,000 when the City Council finds doing so would save money or result in faster project completion?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72269, "no_votes": 59335, "total_votes": 131604, "percent_yes": 54.91398437737455, "percent_no": 45.08601562262545, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.878092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.697546", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "DESIGN-BUILD PROCUREMENT PROCESS:To create taxpayer savings, prevent cost overruns an improve efficiency, may the Charter be amended to allow the design-build procurement process as an expemption to public bidding, wherein the design and construction of a public works project is provided by the same entity, be utilzed for public works contracts that cost over $5,000,000 when the City Council finds doing so would save money or result in faster project completion?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8724, "fingerprint": "2004|200400215|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400215|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "56522057c3ee372c", "measure_id": "200400215", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, accommodate increasing enrollment and upgrade Gavilan College campuses in Gilroy, San Benito and the Morgan Hill area by; Improving fire safety and security; Upgrading plumbing/sewer systems; Upgrading wiring for computer technology; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping classrooms, buildings, libraries and sites; shall Gavilan Joint Community College District issue $108,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11217, "no_votes": 8550, "total_votes": 19767, "percent_yes": 56.74609197146759, "percent_no": 43.25390802853241, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.878747", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.697906", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/four-year colleges, accommodate increasing enrollment and upgrade Gavilan College campuses in Gilroy, San Benito and the Morgan Hill area by; Improving fire safety and security; Upgrading plumbing/sewer systems; Upgrading wiring for computer technology; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping classrooms, buildings, libraries and sites; shall Gavilan Joint Community College District issue $108,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11862, "fingerprint": "2004|200400687|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400687|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "bf948b9d79a7e852", "measure_id": "200400687", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "San Jose City College and Evergreen Valley College Improvement Measure. To prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities by: Building art, science and math classrooms and labs; Expanding healthcare job training facilities; and by Upgrading, aquiring, constructing and equipping facilities, sites and classrooms; shall San Jose-Evergreen Community College District issue $185 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries and without increasing existing tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 141070, "no_votes": 74661, "total_votes": 215731, "percent_yes": 65.39162197366164, "percent_no": 34.60837802633836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.835056", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.885141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.701546", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Jose City College and Evergreen Valley College Improvement Measure. To prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities by: Building art, science and math classrooms and labs; Expanding healthcare job training facilities; and by Upgrading, aquiring, constructing and equipping facilities, sites and classrooms; shall San Jose-Evergreen Community College District issue $185 million in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, and no money for administrators' salaries and without increasing existing tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8727, "fingerprint": "2004|200400218|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400218|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b983a3a5b4a61ed3", "measure_id": "200400218", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To avoid closing two neighborhood elementary schools and to minimize further reduction in staff, programs and supplies, shall the Union Elementary School District collect an education tax of $195/year per taxable parcel for four years, with exemptions for parcels owned/occupied by seniors (65+), with citizen oversight, and shall the Districts annual appropriations limit be raised by such amount?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8333, "no_votes": 4610, "total_votes": 12943, "percent_yes": 64.38229158618557, "percent_no": 35.61770841381443, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.879691", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.698452", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid closing two neighborhood elementary schools and to minimize further reduction in staff, programs and supplies, shall the Union Elementary School District collect an education tax of $195/year per taxable parcel for four years, with exemptions for parcels owned/occupied by seniors (65+), with citizen oversight, and shall the Districts annual appropriations limit be raised by such amount?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11865, "fingerprint": "2004|200400691|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400691|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "69640e58d3bd6bcf", "measure_id": "200400691", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade West Valley and Mission Colleges, improve training/transfer programs, upgrade fire safety, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, repair/expand job training classrooms for nurses, police, firefighters, paramedics, upgrade classroom technology for a changing workforce, repair, construct, equip buildings, classrooms, libraries, sites, science/computer labs, shall West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $235 million in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrator's salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78138, "no_votes": 51805, "total_votes": 129943, "percent_yes": 60.132519643228186, "percent_no": 39.867480356771814, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.835898", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.886280", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.702268", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade West Valley and Mission Colleges, improve training/transfer programs, upgrade fire safety, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, repair/expand job training classrooms for nurses, police, firefighters, paramedics, upgrade classroom technology for a changing workforce, repair, construct, equip buildings, classrooms, libraries, sites, science/computer labs, shall West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $235 million in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrator's salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8723, "fingerprint": "2004|200400214|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400214|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c416c617ad989754", "measure_id": "200400214", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain improved instructional quality for children by providing training for teachers, retention of quality teachers, continuation of art, science, music, technology, physical education programs, and reduced class sizes shall the Gann Appropiration Limit increase approved by 69 percent of the voters in 2001 be continued (commencing June 30, 2005), thus allowing the Cambrian School District to continue to expend the funds generated by Measure A with no increase in property taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5075, "no_votes": 1778, "total_votes": 6853, "percent_yes": 74.05515832482125, "percent_no": 25.94484167517875, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.878419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.697726", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain improved instructional quality for children by providing training for teachers, retention of quality teachers, continuation of art, science, music, technology, physical education programs, and reduced class sizes shall the Gann Appropiration Limit increase approved by 69 percent of the voters in 2001 be continued (commencing June 30, 2005), thus allowing the Cambrian School District to continue to expend the funds generated by Measure A with no increase in property taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11861, "fingerprint": "2004|200400686|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400686|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "99c560259cdc8393", "measure_id": "200400686", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high quality education in our neighborhood schools, avoid deeper cuts to classroom instruction, maintain managable class sizes, and preserve educational programs that attract the best teachers and school employees, and enhance student achievement, shall Palo Alto Unified School District increase its current parcel tax by $19 per parcel per month for 8 years, with an exemption for senior citizens and all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22301, "no_votes": 11483, "total_votes": 33784, "percent_yes": 66.0105375325598, "percent_no": 33.989462467440205, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.834788", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.884862", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.701366", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high quality education in our neighborhood schools, avoid deeper cuts to classroom instruction, maintain managable class sizes, and preserve educational programs that attract the best teachers and school employees, and enhance student achievement, shall Palo Alto Unified School District increase its current parcel tax by $19 per parcel per month for 8 years, with an exemption for senior citizens and all money staying in our community to benefit local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8725, "fingerprint": "2004|200400216|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400216|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1f2f9e5e0ae0fb0c", "measure_id": "200400216", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2008) the Gann appropriations Limit increase approved by voters in 2000, thus allowing the district to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 244, "no_votes": 135, "total_votes": 379, "percent_yes": 64.37994722955145, "percent_no": 35.62005277044855, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.879040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.698086", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2008) the Gann appropriations Limit increase approved by voters in 2000, thus allowing the district to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11864, "fingerprint": "2004|200400689|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400689|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5f86fc07d196cb4d", "measure_id": "200400689", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To rehabilitate middle and high schools, improve student safety and qualify for State matching funds, shall Santa Clara Unified School District make seismic upgrades to classrooms and schools, add school facilities to relieve overcrowding, and repair deteriorated plumbing, sewers, bathrooms, leaky roofs, aging boilers, inadequate heating, electrical and building systems; by issuing $315,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrative salaries, and all money staying in our community to improve local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27343, "no_votes": 10610, "total_votes": 37953, "percent_yes": 72.04437066898532, "percent_no": 27.955629331014677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.835483", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.885741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.701909", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To rehabilitate middle and high schools, improve student safety and qualify for State matching funds, shall Santa Clara Unified School District make seismic upgrades to classrooms and schools, add school facilities to relieve overcrowding, and repair deteriorated plumbing, sewers, bathrooms, leaky roofs, aging boilers, inadequate heating, electrical and building systems; by issuing $315,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, no money for administrative salaries, and all money staying in our community to improve local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8726, "fingerprint": "2004|200400217|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400217|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "445a3e44810e8fbc", "measure_id": "200400217", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce the impact of budget cuts to Mountain View-Whisman School District schools and protect quality education by providing resources for small schools/small classes, retaining teachers/staff, restoring music/art education, keeping school libraries open, and preserving essential educational programs, shall Mountain View-Whisman School District levy a temporary tax based on square footage of parcels of property, as described in the voter pamphlet, for 5 years with independent citizen oversight, an exemption for seniors and all funds benefiting Mountain View-Whisman School District children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9493, "no_votes": 4085, "total_votes": 13578, "percent_yes": 69.91456768301664, "percent_no": 30.085432316983358, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.879330", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.698265", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce the impact of budget cuts to Mountain View-Whisman School District schools and protect quality education by providing resources for small schools/small classes, retaining teachers/staff, restoring music/art education, keeping school libraries open, and preserving essential educational programs, shall Mountain View-Whisman School District levy a temporary tax based on square footage of parcels of property, as described in the voter pamphlet, for 5 years with independent citizen oversight, an exemption for seniors and all funds benefiting Mountain View-Whisman School District children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8736, "fingerprint": "2004|200400682|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400682|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "28ab72e96e29d378", "measure_id": "200400682", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student literacy, provide students training in modern technology, and improve student safety throughout the District including Andrew Hill, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Overfelt and Yerba Buena High Schools, shall East Side Union High School District levy an annual tax of $50 per parcel provided spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee and all funds are spent locally and not transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 77777, "no_votes": 45854, "total_votes": 123631, "percent_yes": 62.9105968567754, "percent_no": 37.0894031432246, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.883541", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.700634", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student literacy, provide students training in modern technology, and improve student safety throughout the District including Andrew Hill, Evergreen Valley, Foothill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Oak Grove, Piedmont Hills, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Overfelt and Yerba Buena High Schools, shall East Side Union High School District levy an annual tax of $50 per parcel provided spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee and all funds are spent locally and not transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8739, "fingerprint": "2004|200400685|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400685|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "77f6a6f525344710", "measure_id": "200400685", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain high quality education at our local high schools--Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook, and Monta Vista High Schools--by preserving core academic classes, maintaining qualified and experienced teachers and school employees, and continuing programs that help our students qualifiy for college, shall the Fremont Union High School District levy $98 per parcel annually for 6 years to benefit local schools with an exemption for seniors, no money for administrators and all money staying in our community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46496, "no_votes": 22790, "total_votes": 69286, "percent_yes": 67.10735213463037, "percent_no": 32.892647865369625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.884449", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.701181", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain high quality education at our local high schools--Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook, and Monta Vista High Schools--by preserving core academic classes, maintaining qualified and experienced teachers and school employees, and continuing programs that help our students qualifiy for college, shall the Fremont Union High School District levy $98 per parcel annually for 6 years to benefit local schools with an exemption for seniors, no money for administrators and all money staying in our community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8734, "fingerprint": "2004|200400680|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400680|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "743180ac5e29cfca", "measure_id": "200400680", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To restore funds cut by state government with local funds that cannot be taken by the state, reduce class size, retain qualified teachers, restore/expand offerings in science, mathematics, English, Advanced Placement, music, foreign language and other classes, and improve academics and safety at Branham, Del Mar, Leigh, Prospect, Westmont, Camden, and Boynton High Schools; shall Campbell Union High School District assess parcels $85/year, for five years, with citizen oversight and exemptions for residents 65 years and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49930, "no_votes": 24024, "total_votes": 73954, "percent_yes": 67.51494172052898, "percent_no": 32.48505827947102, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.882901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.700265", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore funds cut by state government with local funds that cannot be taken by the state, reduce class size, retain qualified teachers, restore/expand offerings in science, mathematics, English, Advanced Placement, music, foreign language and other classes, and improve academics and safety at Branham, Del Mar, Leigh, Prospect, Westmont, Camden, and Boynton High Schools; shall Campbell Union High School District assess parcels $85/year, for five years, with citizen oversight and exemptions for residents 65 years and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8737, "fingerprint": "2004|200400683|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400683|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6830ebab1acbac84", "measure_id": "200400683", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure funding for local Evergreen schools that cannot be taken away by the State and that will be used to continue K-3 class-size reduction; keep school libraries open; support technology in every school; and provide a textbook for every child: shall the Evergreen Elementary School District be authorized to levy a tax  of ($94) per parcel per year for a period of only four years with and exemption for 65 or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19070, "no_votes": 9781, "total_votes": 28851, "percent_yes": 66.09822883088975, "percent_no": 33.90177116911025, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.883832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.700818", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure funding for local Evergreen schools that cannot be taken away by the State and that will be used to continue K-3 class-size reduction; keep school libraries open; support technology in every school; and provide a textbook for every child: shall the Evergreen Elementary School District be authorized to levy a tax  of ($94) per parcel per year for a period of only four years with and exemption for 65 or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8735, "fingerprint": "2004|200400681|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400681|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "418794bd72b1bd62", "measure_id": "200400681", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain high quality education at our neighborhood elementary and middle schools by attracting and retaining the best teachers and staff; keeping class sizes small; maintaining essential educational programs including music and art; and funding programs that enhance student achievement, shall the Cupertino Union School District levy $98 per parcel annually for 6 years with an exemption for seniors, no money for administrator salaries and all money staying in our community to benefit local public schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31583, "no_votes": 16145, "total_votes": 47728, "percent_yes": 66.17289641300704, "percent_no": 33.82710358699296, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.883246", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.700448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain high quality education at our neighborhood elementary and middle schools by attracting and retaining the best teachers and staff; keeping class sizes small; maintaining essential educational programs including music and art; and funding programs that enhance student achievement, shall the Cupertino Union School District levy $98 per parcel annually for 6 years with an exemption for seniors, no money for administrator salaries and all money staying in our community to benefit local public schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8740, "fingerprint": "2004|200400690|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400690|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a2015f5d8d81f60c", "measure_id": "200400690", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain a safe learning environment at Sunnyvale's elementary and middle schools by replacing 40 year old gas, water and sewer lines; improving and expanding school libraries; installing energy efficient heating and cooling systems; replacing portables with permanent classrooms; expanding school facilities to relieve overcrowding; and making essential school improvements shall Sunnyvale School District issue $120 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators and all funds staying locally?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16283, "no_votes": 6030, "total_votes": 22313, "percent_yes": 72.97539550934434, "percent_no": 27.024604490655662, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.886010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.702088", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain a safe learning environment at Sunnyvale's elementary and middle schools by replacing 40 year old gas, water and sewer lines; improving and expanding school libraries; installing energy efficient heating and cooling systems; replacing portables with permanent classrooms; expanding school facilities to relieve overcrowding; and making essential school improvements shall Sunnyvale School District issue $120 million in bonds at legal rates, with citizen oversight, no money for administrators and all funds staying locally?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8738, "fingerprint": "2004|200400684|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400684|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0fdca529651627b9", "measure_id": "200400684", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Franklin-McKinley School Repairs. Shall Franklin-McKinley School District relieve overcrowding, repair, upgrade and equip all local schools, improve student safety conditions, upgrade electrical wiring for technology, install energy efficient heating/cooling systems, replace outdated plumbing/sewer systems, repair leaky rundown roofs/bathrooms, drainage systems, construct a new school, repair, acquire, improve, schools, sites and classrooms, by issuing $30,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for adminstrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11366, "no_votes": 4266, "total_votes": 15632, "percent_yes": 72.70982599795292, "percent_no": 27.29017400204708, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.884123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.701001", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Franklin-McKinley School Repairs. Shall Franklin-McKinley School District relieve overcrowding, repair, upgrade and equip all local schools, improve student safety conditions, upgrade electrical wiring for technology, install energy efficient heating/cooling systems, replace outdated plumbing/sewer systems, repair leaky rundown roofs/bathrooms, drainage systems, construct a new school, repair, acquire, improve, schools, sites and classrooms, by issuing $30,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for adminstrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8733, "fingerprint": "2004|200400679|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400679|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "2b08786089a7620c", "measure_id": "200400679", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood elementary and middle schools by: Expanding reading, math and science programs; Reducing class sizes; Providing one teacher for every 20 students in kindergarten through third grade; Replacing outdated library books; and Improving teacher retention and recruitment: shall Alum Rock Elementary School District levy an annual parcel tax of $100, for five years only, adjusted annually for inflations, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13593, "no_votes": 6147, "total_votes": 19740, "percent_yes": 68.86018237082067, "percent_no": 31.139817629179333, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.882568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.700086", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood elementary and middle schools by: Expanding reading, math and science programs; Reducing class sizes; Providing one teacher for every 20 students in kindergarten through third grade; Replacing outdated library books; and Improving teacher retention and recruitment: shall Alum Rock Elementary School District levy an annual parcel tax of $100, for five years only, adjusted annually for inflations, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8730, "fingerprint": "2004|200400560|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400560|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8522bc9c1c11a802", "measure_id": "200400560", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "San Jose Library and Reading Protection Measure. To support neighborhood libraries, including: buying needed books and materials; preventing severe reductions in hours; preventing deep cuts in children's reading programs; shall the City of San Jose replace the expiring library assessment with an annual parcel tax in the same amount, $25 for single-family residences and proportional for other properties, adjusted for inflation capped at 3% annually, limited to ten years and subject to independent audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 172883, "no_votes": 84462, "total_votes": 257345, "percent_yes": 67.17946725213235, "percent_no": 32.820532747867645, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.881619", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.699544", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "San Jose Library and Reading Protection Measure. To support neighborhood libraries, including: buying needed books and materials; preventing severe reductions in hours; preventing deep cuts in children's reading programs; shall the City of San Jose replace the expiring library assessment with an annual parcel tax in the same amount, $25 for single-family residences and proportional for other properties, adjusted for inflation capped at 3% annually, limited to ten years and subject to independent audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8729, "fingerprint": "2004|200400559|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400559|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "89efbab34883b42e", "measure_id": "200400559", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that requires that, until December 31, 2018, any amendments to the existing \"Hillside Combining District\" Ordinance and any amendements to the general plan land use designation for lands currently designated as \"Hillside\" property be approved by the voters before becoming effective?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10466, "no_votes": 5428, "total_votes": 15894, "percent_yes": 65.84874795520322, "percent_no": 34.15125204479678, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.881324", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.699366", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that requires that, until December 31, 2018, any amendments to the existing \"Hillside Combining District\" Ordinance and any amendements to the general plan land use designation for lands currently designated as \"Hillside\" property be approved by the voters before becoming effective?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8731, "fingerprint": "2004|200400561|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400561|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "50662e2d2f660ac4", "measure_id": "200400561", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) This is a non-binding advisory measure asking Saratoga voters' preferences in funding City services.  This measure does not limit the authority of the City Council to spend tax revenues on general municipal services.  Should the City of Saratoga use funds generated by a utility user tax primarily for repair, maintenance, and improvement of City infrastructure (including streets, bridges, sidewalks, medians, buildings, storm drains, and parks), and to maintain or improve current levels of public safety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7718, "no_votes": 6083, "total_votes": 13801, "percent_yes": 55.923483805521336, "percent_no": 44.076516194478664, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.881944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.699724", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) This is a non-binding advisory measure asking Saratoga voters' preferences in funding City services.  This measure does not limit the authority of the City Council to spend tax revenues on general municipal services.  Should the City of Saratoga use funds generated by a utility user tax primarily for repair, maintenance, and improvement of City infrastructure (including streets, bridges, sidewalks, medians, buildings, storm drains, and parks), and to maintain or improve current levels of public safety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8732, "fingerprint": "2004|200400562|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400562|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "db1923b924d069ab", "measure_id": "200400562", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Saratoga adopt an ordinance imposing a 4% tax on users of telephone, electricity, gas, water, and video services for general revenue purposes that will sunset ten years from its effective date?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2919, "no_votes": 11617, "total_votes": 14536, "percent_yes": 20.0811777655476, "percent_no": 79.91882223445239, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.882264", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.699907", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Saratoga adopt an ordinance imposing a 4% tax on users of telephone, electricity, gas, water, and video services for general revenue purposes that will sunset ten years from its effective date?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8742, "fingerprint": "2004|200400219|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400219|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "5d5b0be8bfa7ec53", "measure_id": "200400219", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To train and prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities and improve safety by providing: Classrooms for healthcare and job training programs; a university and career readiness center; improved math, science, arts, English and other instructional facilities; and by upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $118,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43470, "no_votes": 26643, "total_votes": 70113, "percent_yes": 61.99991442385863, "percent_no": 38.00008557614137, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.886872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.702631", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To train and prepare students for jobs and transfer to four-year universities and improve safety by providing: Classrooms for healthcare and job training programs; a university and career readiness center; improved math, science, arts, English and other instructional facilities; and by upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Cabrillo Community College District issue $118,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8743, "fingerprint": "2004|200400220|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400220|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "fcdd86a48451ecd3", "measure_id": "200400220", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to upgrade electrical, heating and plumbing systems; replace fire alarms and other safety systems; modernize classrooms; fix leaky roofs, and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Live Oak School District be authorized to renovate, repair, modrenize and acquire property for school/joint-use facilities and issue $14,5000,00 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4446, "no_votes": 1654, "total_votes": 6100, "percent_yes": 72.88524590163934, "percent_no": 27.114754098360663, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.887143", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.702813", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to upgrade electrical, heating and plumbing systems; replace fire alarms and other safety systems; modernize classrooms; fix leaky roofs, and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Live Oak School District be authorized to renovate, repair, modrenize and acquire property for school/joint-use facilities and issue $14,5000,00 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8741, "fingerprint": "2004|200400120|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400120|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "df85c6a5105fb92e", "measure_id": "200400120", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a temporary sales tax rate increase of one-quarter of one percent, which will end after five years, be adopted to help limit further budget cuts in the City's General Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12995, "no_votes": 5828, "total_votes": 18823, "percent_yes": 69.03787919035223, "percent_no": 30.96212080964777, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.886556", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.702447", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a temporary sales tax rate increase of one-quarter of one percent, which will end after five years, be adopted to help limit further budget cuts in the City's General Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8756, "fingerprint": "2004|200400692|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400692|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "345502066e24502f", "measure_id": "200400692", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade West Valley and Mission Colleges, improve training/transfer programs, upgrade fire safety, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, repair/expand job training classrooms for nurses, police, fire fightesr, paramedics, upgrade classroom technology for a changing workforce, repair, construct, equip buildings, classrooms, libraries, sites, science/computer labs, shall West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $235 million in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrator's salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1386, "no_votes": 1065, "total_votes": 2451, "percent_yes": 56.54834761321909, "percent_no": 43.45165238678091, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.890902", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.705157", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade West Valley and Mission Colleges, improve training/transfer programs, upgrade fire safety, repair leaky roofs, improve disabled access, repair/expand job training classrooms for nurses, police, fire fightesr, paramedics, upgrade classroom technology for a changing workforce, repair, construct, equip buildings, classrooms, libraries, sites, science/computer labs, shall West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $235 million in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrator's salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8744, "fingerprint": "2004|200400221|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400221|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ccb8858ff5edd9b2", "measure_id": "200400221", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2008) the Gann Appropriatoins Limit increase approved by the voters in 2000, thus allowing the district to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 901, "no_votes": 495, "total_votes": 1396, "percent_yes": 64.54154727793696, "percent_no": 35.45845272206304, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.887481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.702994", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2008) the Gann Appropriatoins Limit increase approved by the voters in 2000, thus allowing the district to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8745, "fingerprint": "2004|200400348|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400348|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "044e7ba99386503e", "measure_id": "200400348", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a half-cent sales tax be adopted to improve transportation in Santa Cruz County? Improvements will include: widening Highway 1 with carpool/bus/emergency lanes; improving local streets, sidewalks and bike paths, safety on Highway 17, elderly/disabled transportation; building a Coastal bike/walking path next to the rail line; and a Pajaro train station.  This 30-year measure will be monitored by an independent oversight committee.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50024, "no_votes": 65628, "total_votes": 115652, "percent_yes": 43.25389962992425, "percent_no": 56.74610037007575, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.887788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.703177", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a half-cent sales tax be adopted to improve transportation in Santa Cruz County? Improvements will include: widening Highway 1 with carpool/bus/emergency lanes; improving local streets, sidewalks and bike paths, safety on Highway 17, elderly/disabled transportation; building a Coastal bike/walking path next to the rail line; and a Pajaro train station.  This 30-year measure will be monitored by an independent oversight committee.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8746, "fingerprint": "2004|200400349|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400349|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "3dbd63acaf41212b", "measure_id": "200400349", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County's Emergency Response Fee Ordinance, Chapter 4.28 of the Santa Cruz County Code, be repealed.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17810, "no_votes": 42430, "total_votes": 60240, "percent_yes": 29.56507304116866, "percent_no": 70.43492695883134, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.888058", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.703362", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County's Emergency Response Fee Ordinance, Chapter 4.28 of the Santa Cruz County Code, be repealed.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8748, "fingerprint": "2004|200400564|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400564|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "50f193856fc4e2cc", "measure_id": "200400564", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 707 be added to the City of Santa Cruz Charter to allow the City Council, be resolution, to authorize any municipal election, other than on a date of a regular statewide primary or statewide general election, to be conducted by mail, in accordance with the mail ballot election procedures set forth in the Elections Code of the State of California?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16158, "no_votes": 8780, "total_votes": 24938, "percent_yes": 64.79268586093512, "percent_no": 35.20731413906488, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.888594", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.703720", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 707 be added to the City of Santa Cruz Charter to allow the City Council, be resolution, to authorize any municipal election, other than on a date of a regular statewide primary or statewide general election, to be conducted by mail, in accordance with the mail ballot election procedures set forth in the Elections Code of the State of California?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8749, "fingerprint": "2004|200400565|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400565|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "707ea6c047fa194d", "measure_id": "200400565", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 601 of the City of Santa Cruz Charter be amended to further clarify that no member of the Council shall be eligible for re-elction for two years (i.e. one general election cycle) after the expiration of the second consecutive full term for which such person was elected.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18577, "no_votes": 6645, "total_votes": 25222, "percent_yes": 73.65395289826341, "percent_no": 26.346047101736588, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.888895", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.703898", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 601 of the City of Santa Cruz Charter be amended to further clarify that no member of the Council shall be eligible for re-elction for two years (i.e. one general election cycle) after the expiration of the second consecutive full term for which such person was elected.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8750, "fingerprint": "2004|200400566|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400566|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "11f5fcbe603fbfaf", "measure_id": "200400566", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 613 of the City of Santa Cruz Charter be amended to authorize the City Clerk to publish ordinances, other than emergency ordinances and other ordinances which go into effect immediately upon adoption, by methods which include publication in the Internet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18944, "no_votes": 5716, "total_votes": 24660, "percent_yes": 76.82076236820762, "percent_no": 23.179237631792375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.889231", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.704076", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 613 of the City of Santa Cruz Charter be amended to authorize the City Clerk to publish ordinances, other than emergency ordinances and other ordinances which go into effect immediately upon adoption, by methods which include publication in the Internet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8751, "fingerprint": "2004|200400567|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400567|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "6e46b8658aca141b", "measure_id": "200400567", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 811 of the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz be amended to provide that the City Clerk shall have the power and be required to preserve the record of all proceedings of the City Council in files that shall bear appropriate titles and be devoted to such purpose.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21258, "no_votes": 3392, "total_votes": 24650, "percent_yes": 86.2393509127789, "percent_no": 13.760649087221097, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.889497", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.704255", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 811 of the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz be amended to provide that the City Clerk shall have the power and be required to preserve the record of all proceedings of the City Council in files that shall bear appropriate titles and be devoted to such purpose.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8747, "fingerprint": "2004|200400563|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400563|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a41bfae44d8b4135", "measure_id": "200400563", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a City of Capitola temporary sales tax increase of one quarter of one percent, which sunsets in five years, be adopted to maintain general services including public safety and street improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2855, "no_votes": 1921, "total_votes": 4776, "percent_yes": 59.778056951423785, "percent_no": 40.221943048576215, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.888324", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.703540", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a City of Capitola temporary sales tax increase of one quarter of one percent, which sunsets in five years, be adopted to maintain general services including public safety and street improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8752, "fingerprint": "2004|200400568|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400568|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "fbe80d691ec422a6", "measure_id": "200400568", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Watsonville adopt a sales tax increase of one-quarter percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3661, "no_votes": 6198, "total_votes": 9859, "percent_yes": 37.13358352774115, "percent_no": 62.86641647225885, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.889767", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.704435", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Watsonville adopt a sales tax increase of one-quarter percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8753, "fingerprint": "2004|200400569|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400569|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "6b86baffc1af543f", "measure_id": "200400569", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Watsonville use the funds from Measure Q, if approved by the voters, for police, fire, parks and recreation services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6647, "no_votes": 2489, "total_votes": 9136, "percent_yes": 72.7561295971979, "percent_no": 27.243870402802102, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.890067", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.704617", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Watsonville use the funds from Measure Q, if approved by the voters, for police, fire, parks and recreation services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8754, "fingerprint": "2004|200400570|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400570|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "f8d93ccb70e80be6", "measure_id": "200400570", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do the qualified electors of the City of Watsonville approve the development, construction, or acquisition by any state public body of Article 34 low rent housing units dispersed throughout the City, if such units do not exceed 1% per year of the total dwelling units in the City except that units not built in any one or more years may be \"banked\" for future years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4813, "no_votes": 4257, "total_votes": 9070, "percent_yes": 53.06504961411246, "percent_no": 46.93495038588754, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.890367", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.704796", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do the qualified electors of the City of Watsonville approve the development, construction, or acquisition by any state public body of Article 34 low rent housing units dispersed throughout the City, if such units do not exceed 1% per year of the total dwelling units in the City except that units not built in any one or more years may be \"banked\" for future years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8755, "fingerprint": "2004|200400571|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400571|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "11847c7cd9b19e98", "measure_id": "200400571", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Watsonville repeal Chapter 3-15, Emergency Response Fee, of the Watsonville Municipal Code which authorizes a fee to pay the cost of operating Watsonville's share of the Santa Cruz County 911 communication system?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3516, "no_votes": 5904, "total_votes": 9420, "percent_yes": 37.324840764331206, "percent_no": 62.675159235668794, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.890634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.704978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Watsonville repeal Chapter 3-15, Emergency Response Fee, of the Watsonville Municipal Code which authorizes a fee to pay the cost of operating Watsonville's share of the Santa Cruz County 911 communication system?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8757, "fingerprint": "2004|200400222|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400222|SHASTA", "content_hash": "a0711031d4403256", "measure_id": "200400222", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide funds to finish the new junior high wing of Grant School (Paid for by a $4,600,000 State grant) from its current unfinished state to a condition suitable for student occupancy and community use; install safety lights, fencing, floors, carpets, interior finishes and doors; develop playing fields; finish the gymnasium, and provide desk, computers, science and other equipment; shall Grant Elementary School District issue $1.7 million of bonds bearing interest at rates within legal limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 671, "no_votes": 533, "total_votes": 1204, "percent_yes": 55.730897009966775, "percent_no": 44.269102990033225, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.891175", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.705339", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide funds to finish the new junior high wing of Grant School (Paid for by a $4,600,000 State grant) from its current unfinished state to a condition suitable for student occupancy and community use; install safety lights, fencing, floors, carpets, interior finishes and doors; develop playing fields; finish the gymnasium, and provide desk, computers, science and other equipment; shall Grant Elementary School District issue $1.7 million of bonds bearing interest at rates within legal limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8758, "fingerprint": "2004|200400693|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400693|SHASTA", "content_hash": "78c47d0a435c85d1", "measure_id": "200400693", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize its schools and classrooms; including electrical, heating and plumbing systems; fix leaky roofs; and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Fall River Joint Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, construct and acquire school facilities and equipment and issue $4,400,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2067, "no_votes": 1377, "total_votes": 3444, "percent_yes": 60.01742160278746, "percent_no": 39.98257839721254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.891472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.705518", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize its schools and classrooms; including electrical, heating and plumbing systems; fix leaky roofs; and to qualify for state matching funds, shall the Fall River Joint Unified School District be authorized to replace, renovate, construct and acquire school facilities and equipment and issue $4,400,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with no funds for administrator salaries and an appointed Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8759, "fingerprint": "2004|200400121|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400121|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "661556beaaaa4f0a", "measure_id": "200400121", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council of the City of Yreka increase by two percent (2%) the general tax for the privilege of transient occupancy in any hotel as defined in Chapter 3.12 of the Yreka Municipal Code, which increase would set the total transient occupancy tax at ten percent of the rent charged by the operator.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1356, "no_votes": 732, "total_votes": 2088, "percent_yes": 64.9425287356322, "percent_no": 35.057471264367805, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.891778", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.705699", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council of the City of Yreka increase by two percent (2%) the general tax for the privilege of transient occupancy in any hotel as defined in Chapter 3.12 of the Yreka Municipal Code, which increase would set the total transient occupancy tax at ten percent of the rent charged by the operator.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8765, "fingerprint": "2004|200400355|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400355|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "150c2ceda4607663", "measure_id": "200400355", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall there be an increase of two percent (2%) to the General Tax for the privilege of transient occupancy in any hotel as defined in Title 8, Chapter 4 of the Siskiyou County Code, which increase would set the total Transient Occupancy Tax at ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by the operator.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4928, "no_votes": 6646, "total_votes": 11574, "percent_yes": 42.578192500432, "percent_no": 57.421807499568, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.893490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.706803", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be an increase of two percent (2%) to the General Tax for the privilege of transient occupancy in any hotel as defined in Title 8, Chapter 4 of the Siskiyou County Code, which increase would set the total Transient Occupancy Tax at ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by the operator.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8760, "fingerprint": "2004|200400350|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400350|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "9fe7861d6df4bf36", "measure_id": "200400350", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Lake Shastina Community Services District levy a special tax, effective January 1, 2005, for fire department in an amount not to exceed: Improved Residential and Non-residential parcels, $10.00 per month.  Unimproved Residential and Non-residential parcels, $6.25 per month. Said tax shall be used to employ up to two full-time firefighters/emergency medical personnel, and obtaining, maintaining and operating fire department equipment, buildings and related services.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 373, "no_votes": 576, "total_votes": 949, "percent_yes": 39.304531085353, "percent_no": 60.695468914647, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.892078", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.705884", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Lake Shastina Community Services District levy a special tax, effective January 1, 2005, for fire department in an amount not to exceed: Improved Residential and Non-residential parcels, $10.00 per month.  Unimproved Residential and Non-residential parcels, $6.25 per month. Said tax shall be used to employ up to two full-time firefighters/emergency medical personnel, and obtaining, maintaining and operating fire department equipment, buildings and related services.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8761, "fingerprint": "2004|200400351|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400351|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "b773687fbb03697a", "measure_id": "200400351", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy an additional special parcel tax commencing in Fiscal Year 2005-06 to provide fire protection and emergency response services at the rates and for the land use categories specified in Resolution 06, 2004, subject to a fixed annual increase of three percent (3%) per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 220, "no_votes": 349, "total_votes": 569, "percent_yes": 38.66432337434095, "percent_no": 61.33567662565905, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.892345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.706068", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy an additional special parcel tax commencing in Fiscal Year 2005-06 to provide fire protection and emergency response services at the rates and for the land use categories specified in Resolution 06, 2004, subject to a fixed annual increase of three percent (3%) per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8762, "fingerprint": "2004|200400352|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400352|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "cf56824c86c209fc", "measure_id": "200400352", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy an additional special parcel tax commencing in Fiscal Year 2005-06 to provide ambulance services at the rates and for the land use categories specified in Resolution 07, 2004, subject to a fixed annual increase of three percent (3%) per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 188, "no_votes": 379, "total_votes": 567, "percent_yes": 33.15696649029982, "percent_no": 66.84303350970018, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.892627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.706253", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy an additional special parcel tax commencing in Fiscal Year 2005-06 to provide ambulance services at the rates and for the land use categories specified in Resolution 07, 2004, subject to a fixed annual increase of three percent (3%) per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8763, "fingerprint": "2004|200400353|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400353|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "5d1a638e2232f1b3", "measure_id": "200400353", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a special parcel tax commencing in Fiscal Year 2005-06 to provide park and recreation services, to replace the existing special tax for such services approved by the voters of the district on June 3, 1997, at the rates and for the land use categories specified in Resolution 08, 2004, subject to a fixed annual increase of three percent (3%) per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 127, "no_votes": 437, "total_votes": 564, "percent_yes": 22.5177304964539, "percent_no": 77.48226950354609, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.892911", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.706437", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a special parcel tax commencing in Fiscal Year 2005-06 to provide park and recreation services, to replace the existing special tax for such services approved by the voters of the district on June 3, 1997, at the rates and for the land use categories specified in Resolution 08, 2004, subject to a fixed annual increase of three percent (3%) per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8764, "fingerprint": "2004|200400354|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400354|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "0855ad92726b97ea", "measure_id": "200400354", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a new special parcel tax commencing in Fiscal Year 2005-06 to provide street lighting services, to replace the existing parcel fee for such services approved by the voters of the district on June 16, 1997, at the rates specified in Resolution 09, 2004, subject to a fixed annual increase of two percent (2%) per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 165, "no_votes": 401, "total_votes": 566, "percent_yes": 29.151943462897528, "percent_no": 70.84805653710248, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.893177", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.706620", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the McCloud Community Services District levy a new special parcel tax commencing in Fiscal Year 2005-06 to provide street lighting services, to replace the existing parcel fee for such services approved by the voters of the district on June 16, 1997, at the rates specified in Resolution 09, 2004, subject to a fixed annual increase of two percent (2%) per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8766, "fingerprint": "2004|200400572|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400572|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "7f262adb275f77b3", "measure_id": "200400572", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Yreka levy an annual special tax for the Yreka Volunteer Fire Department on each improved legal parcel within the City, at the rates set forth in City of Yreka Resolution 2485, which shall be payable in monthly installments to the City of Yreka, and which will be used to pay for training, wages and benefits of firefighters, acquiring Fire Fighting or Rescue equipment or vehicles and improving or constructing fire stations, sub-stations, or training facilities.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1708, "no_votes": 1501, "total_votes": 3209, "percent_yes": 53.22530383296977, "percent_no": 46.77469616703023, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.893797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.706987", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Yreka levy an annual special tax for the Yreka Volunteer Fire Department on each improved legal parcel within the City, at the rates set forth in City of Yreka Resolution 2485, which shall be payable in monthly installments to the City of Yreka, and which will be used to pay for training, wages and benefits of firefighters, acquiring Fire Fighting or Rescue equipment or vehicles and improving or constructing fire stations, sub-stations, or training facilities.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8767, "fingerprint": "2004|200400049|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400049|SOLANO", "content_hash": "eb7ae8318a9caacb", "measure_id": "200400049", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following:(1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART. (B) New transbay commuter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. (C) Comprehensive Regional Express Bus network. (D) New expanded ferry service.(E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail. (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30980, "no_votes": 44584, "total_votes": 75564, "percent_yes": 40.99835900693452, "percent_no": 59.00164099306548, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.894067", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.707171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voters authorize a Regional Traffic Relief Plan that does the following:(1) Directs revenues generated through the collection of bridge tolls to provide the following projects: (A) Expand and extend BART. (B) New transbay commuter rail crossing south of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. (C) Comprehensive Regional Express Bus network. (D) New expanded ferry service.(E) Better connections between BART, buses, ferries, and rail. (2) Approves a one dollar ($1) toll increase effective July 1, 2004, on all toll bridges in the bay area, except the Golden Gate Bridge?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8769, "fingerprint": "2004|200400573|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400573|SOLANO", "content_hash": "e115a0ec7bf39337", "measure_id": "200400573", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council create an approximately 3.1 acre waterfront park on a portion of the City-owned land south of East B street from First Street to the Harbor Master's Office, with the remaining 1.25 acres left for limited commercial development, in the general area shown on the map in the Voter's Pamphlet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5771, "no_votes": 7211, "total_votes": 12982, "percent_yes": 44.4538591896472, "percent_no": 55.5461408103528, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.894706", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.707626", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council create an approximately 3.1 acre waterfront park on a portion of the City-owned land south of East B street from First Street to the Harbor Master's Office, with the remaining 1.25 acres left for limited commercial development, in the general area shown on the map in the Voter's Pamphlet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8770, "fingerprint": "2004|200400574|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400574|SOLANO", "content_hash": "e4bf5bdb520ff402", "measure_id": "200400574", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council implement the proposed Waterfront Park initiative that establishes the City-owned land south of East B Street, from First Street to the Harbor Master's Office, as a Waterfront Park, with uses including low impact recreational activities, community events and festivals, as shown on the map in the Voter's Pamphlet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8690, "no_votes": 4165, "total_votes": 12855, "percent_yes": 67.6001555814858, "percent_no": 32.399844418514206, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.895004", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.707809", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council implement the proposed Waterfront Park initiative that establishes the City-owned land south of East B Street, from First Street to the Harbor Master's Office, as a Waterfront Park, with uses including low impact recreational activities, community events and festivals, as shown on the map in the Voter's Pamphlet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8768, "fingerprint": "2004|200400223|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400223|SOLANO", "content_hash": "edb6de738351e41e", "measure_id": "200400223", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs/transfer to four year colleges, repair buildings, improve safety, accommodate growing enrollment by Repairing leaky roofs, decaying walls, electrical wiring; Improving fire safey; Removing asbestos; Expanding/establishing Stockton, Manteca, Tracy, Lodi/Galt, Foothill Area campuses/education centers; Upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equpping buildings, sites, classrooms, shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District issue $250,000,000 in bounds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1014, "no_votes": 1041, "total_votes": 2055, "percent_yes": 49.343065693430646, "percent_no": 50.656934306569354, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.894405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.707354", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs/transfer to four year colleges, repair buildings, improve safety, accommodate growing enrollment by Repairing leaky roofs, decaying walls, electrical wiring; Improving fire safey; Removing asbestos; Expanding/establishing Stockton, Manteca, Tracy, Lodi/Galt, Foothill Area campuses/education centers; Upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equpping buildings, sites, classrooms, shall San Joaquin Delta Community College District issue $250,000,000 in bounds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8772, "fingerprint": "2004|200400576|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400576|SOLANO", "content_hash": "0d3a8dedccd0de21", "measure_id": "200400576", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of the Mayor of the City of Rio Vista be changed from two years to four years, effective November 3, 2004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1911, "no_votes": 1244, "total_votes": 3155, "percent_yes": 60.57052297939778, "percent_no": 39.42947702060222, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.895536", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.708168", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of the Mayor of the City of Rio Vista be changed from two years to four years, effective November 3, 2004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8773, "fingerprint": "2004|200400577|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400577|SOLANO", "content_hash": "66bb483ba5983b08", "measure_id": "200400577", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rio Vista be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1602, "no_votes": 1455, "total_votes": 3057, "percent_yes": 52.40431795878312, "percent_no": 47.59568204121688, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.895805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.708347", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rio Vista be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8771, "fingerprint": "2004|200400575|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400575|SOLANO", "content_hash": "ea596d67d9910e71", "measure_id": "200400575", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-10 be adopted to update and increase the thirty-two year old business license tax to replace funding for city services taken from the city by the state legislature?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7604, "no_votes": 4790, "total_votes": 12394, "percent_yes": 61.35226722607714, "percent_no": 38.64773277392286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.895273", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.707990", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 04-10 be adopted to update and increase the thirty-two year old business license tax to replace funding for city services taken from the city by the state legislature?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8774, "fingerprint": "2004|200400694|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400694|SOLANO", "content_hash": "a14909c6bc713ae1", "measure_id": "200400694", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain high quality local education, protect local schools from budget cuts, improve science and mathematics programs, enhance literacy and reading instruction, maintain music and art programs, attract and retain highly qualified teachers and staff, and maintain college preparation and advanced placement classes, shall Benicia Unified School District be authorized to levy, a $105.00 annual parcel tax, for 5 years beginning July 1, 2005, with exemption to persons 65 years or over, with independent community oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8688, "no_votes": 4756, "total_votes": 13444, "percent_yes": 64.62362392145195, "percent_no": 35.37637607854805, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.896069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.708529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain high quality local education, protect local schools from budget cuts, improve science and mathematics programs, enhance literacy and reading instruction, maintain music and art programs, attract and retain highly qualified teachers and staff, and maintain college preparation and advanced placement classes, shall Benicia Unified School District be authorized to levy, a $105.00 annual parcel tax, for 5 years beginning July 1, 2005, with exemption to persons 65 years or over, with independent community oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8775, "fingerprint": "2004|200400695|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400695|SOLANO", "content_hash": "a6bec55d733eb652", "measure_id": "200400695", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education in Isleton and Rio Vista, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No.1 of River Delta Unified School District construct, upgrade, and improve classrooms and school facilities, renovate restrooms and plumbing, upgrade electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, replace heating and air conditiong systems, make health and safety improvements, and qualify for State grants by issuing $14,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators's salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2290, "no_votes": 1057, "total_votes": 3347, "percent_yes": 68.41948013146101, "percent_no": 31.580519868538985, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.896337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.708711", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education in Isleton and Rio Vista, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No.1 of River Delta Unified School District construct, upgrade, and improve classrooms and school facilities, renovate restrooms and plumbing, upgrade electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, replace heating and air conditiong systems, make health and safety improvements, and qualify for State grants by issuing $14,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators's salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8776, "fingerprint": "2004|200400696|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400696|SOLANO", "content_hash": "9cf52553d2fa5b63", "measure_id": "200400696", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education in Walnut Grove, Courtland, and Clarksburg, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of River Delta Unified School District construct, upgrade and improve classrooms and school facilities, upgrade electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, renovate restrooms adn plumbing, replace heating and air conditiong, make health and safety improvements, and qualify for State grants by issuing $9,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 2, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.896657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.708891", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education in Walnut Grove, Courtland, and Clarksburg, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of River Delta Unified School District construct, upgrade and improve classrooms and school facilities, upgrade electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, renovate restrooms adn plumbing, replace heating and air conditiong, make health and safety improvements, and qualify for State grants by issuing $9,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8785, "fingerprint": "2004|200400271|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400271|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ddf84c3d80855c13", "measure_id": "200400271", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Amie L. Spradlin be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4371, "no_votes": 5472, "total_votes": 9843, "percent_yes": 44.40719292898507, "percent_no": 55.59280707101493, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-24", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.899475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.710528", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Amie L. Spradlin be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8786, "fingerprint": "2004|200400272|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400272|SONOMA", "content_hash": "92ab68f34b521537", "measure_id": "200400272", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Armando F. Flores be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4402, "no_votes": 5371, "total_votes": 9773, "percent_yes": 45.042463931239126, "percent_no": 54.957536068760874, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-24", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.899773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.710711", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Armando F. Flores be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8781, "fingerprint": "2004|200400227|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400227|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0fe18e633ce1a100", "measure_id": "200400227", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to keep school libraries open, restore art and music programs, enhance high school vocational programs, provide expanded academic programs for college-bound students, attract and retain high quality teachers, and reduce class size, should the Sonoma Valley Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $85 for five years, beginning July 1, 2004, with annual citzens' oversight committee audits, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8563, "no_votes": 5175, "total_votes": 13738, "percent_yes": 62.33076139176008, "percent_no": 37.66923860823992, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.898104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.709800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to keep school libraries open, restore art and music programs, enhance high school vocational programs, provide expanded academic programs for college-bound students, attract and retain high quality teachers, and reduce class size, should the Sonoma Valley Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $85 for five years, beginning July 1, 2004, with annual citzens' oversight committee audits, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8778, "fingerprint": "2004|200400224|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400224|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a89d0d130062b645", "measure_id": "200400224", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To keep school libraries open, provide intensive reading instruction, offer an enriching music program, maintain smaller class sizes wihen possible, promoting excellence in literacy for our school children; shall the Old Adobe Union School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $55 for four years, beginning July 1, 2004, with annual audits by a citzens' oversight committee, offering exemption to parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4668, "no_votes": 2950, "total_votes": 7618, "percent_yes": 61.27592543974797, "percent_no": 38.72407456025203, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.897256", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.709256", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep school libraries open, provide intensive reading instruction, offer an enriching music program, maintain smaller class sizes wihen possible, promoting excellence in literacy for our school children; shall the Old Adobe Union School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $55 for four years, beginning July 1, 2004, with annual audits by a citzens' oversight committee, offering exemption to parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8779, "fingerprint": "2004|200400225|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400225|SONOMA", "content_hash": "fd7b6869a1069177", "measure_id": "200400225", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To keep school libraries open, restore music and art programs, restore smaller class sizes grades 4-6, rehire reading specialists, maintain computer and technology programs, and provide necessary educational programs, and materials to the extent funds are available, shall the Petaluma City (Elementary) School District be authorized to levy a $75 annual parcel tax for four years, beginning July 1, 2004, with annual citzens' oversight committee audits, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6760, "no_votes": 3177, "total_votes": 9937, "percent_yes": 68.02858005434236, "percent_no": 31.971419945657644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.897528", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.709436", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep school libraries open, restore music and art programs, restore smaller class sizes grades 4-6, rehire reading specialists, maintain computer and technology programs, and provide necessary educational programs, and materials to the extent funds are available, shall the Petaluma City (Elementary) School District be authorized to levy a $75 annual parcel tax for four years, beginning July 1, 2004, with annual citzens' oversight committee audits, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8780, "fingerprint": "2004|200400226|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400226|SONOMA", "content_hash": "b9c685e884c628c7", "measure_id": "200400226", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds to modernize older classrooms and improve aging school facilities, including upgrading outdated electrical, fire safety, plumbing and heating systems; repair leaking roofs and replace windows; add kindergarten and other classrooms; build modern libraries/technology centers; and improve drainage, campus safety and handicapped access; shall Rincon Valley Union School District be authorized to issue $23,900,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries, and establish an independent citzens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10302, "no_votes": 5986, "total_votes": 16288, "percent_yes": 63.24901768172888, "percent_no": 36.75098231827112, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.897801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.709617", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds to modernize older classrooms and improve aging school facilities, including upgrading outdated electrical, fire safety, plumbing and heating systems; repair leaking roofs and replace windows; add kindergarten and other classrooms; build modern libraries/technology centers; and improve drainage, campus safety and handicapped access; shall Rincon Valley Union School District be authorized to issue $23,900,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, with no funds for administrator salaries, and establish an independent citzens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8782, "fingerprint": "2004|200400228|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400228|SONOMA", "content_hash": "21332530378ed621", "measure_id": "200400228", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To keep school libraries open, maintain reading programs, computer and technology programs, smaller class sizes, music and art programs, and provide for necessary educational programs and materials, to the extent such funds are available, shall the Wilmar Union School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $45 for four years, beginning July 1, 2004, with annual citzens' oversight committee audits, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 829, "no_votes": 356, "total_votes": 1185, "percent_yes": 69.957805907173, "percent_no": 30.042194092827003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.898472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.709983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep school libraries open, maintain reading programs, computer and technology programs, smaller class sizes, music and art programs, and provide for necessary educational programs and materials, to the extent such funds are available, shall the Wilmar Union School District be authorized to levy an annual parcel tax of $45 for four years, beginning July 1, 2004, with annual citzens' oversight committee audits, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8777, "fingerprint": "2004|200400122|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400122|SONOMA", "content_hash": "a551959f6363d858", "measure_id": "200400122", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance No. 3627, which prohibits the sale and use of fireworks within the City of Santa Rosa, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26615, "no_votes": 20252, "total_votes": 46867, "percent_yes": 56.78835854652528, "percent_no": 43.21164145347472, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.896956", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.709072", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance No. 3627, which prohibits the sale and use of fireworks within the City of Santa Rosa, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8783, "fingerprint": "2004|200400265|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400265|SONOMA", "content_hash": "91b7ec76a380b63c", "measure_id": "200400265", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent the loss of educational programs and staffing, shall the Forestville Union School District replace it's existing parcel tax of $26.91 with a parcel tax of $96.00 per year, such tax to continue for a period of eight years beginning July 1, 2004, with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over, and other exemptions as set out in the full text of the measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1152, "no_votes": 921, "total_votes": 2073, "percent_yes": 55.57163531114328, "percent_no": 44.42836468885672, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-06-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.898860", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.710167", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent the loss of educational programs and staffing, shall the Forestville Union School District replace it's existing parcel tax of $26.91 with a parcel tax of $96.00 per year, such tax to continue for a period of eight years beginning July 1, 2004, with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over, and other exemptions as set out in the full text of the measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8784, "fingerprint": "2004|200400266|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400266|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4836658ddebcfa7e", "measure_id": "200400266", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain high quality teachers, provide for necessary educational programs and materials, avoid increased class sizes, and maintain counseling and music programs, shall the Monte Rio Union School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $49 per taxable parcel for five years, beginning July 1, 2004, with annual audits and a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over and other exemptions as set out in the full text of the measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 452, "no_votes": 210, "total_votes": 662, "percent_yes": 68.27794561933534, "percent_no": 31.72205438066466, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-06-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.899178", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.710345", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain high quality teachers, provide for necessary educational programs and materials, avoid increased class sizes, and maintain counseling and music programs, shall the Monte Rio Union School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $49 per taxable parcel for five years, beginning July 1, 2004, with annual audits and a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over and other exemptions as set out in the full text of the measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8787, "fingerprint": "2004|200400280|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400280|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ed13a55d1daf12cd", "measure_id": "200400280", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent the loss of educational programs and staffing, shall the Fort Ross Elementary School District replace it's existing parcel tax of $26.90 with a parcel tax of $48.00 per year, such tax to continue for a period of eight years beginning on July 1, 2005, with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over, and other exemptions as set out in the full text of the measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 187, "no_votes": 58, "total_votes": 245, "percent_yes": 76.32653061224491, "percent_no": 23.67346938775509, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-31", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.900040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.710890", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent the loss of educational programs and staffing, shall the Fort Ross Elementary School District replace it's existing parcel tax of $26.90 with a parcel tax of $48.00 per year, such tax to continue for a period of eight years beginning on July 1, 2005, with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over, and other exemptions as set out in the full text of the measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8797, "fingerprint": "2004|200400698|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400698|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c8d9e62f0a833019", "measure_id": "200400698", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To keep school libraries open, restore smaller class sizes grades 7-12, restore and maintain computer and technology programs, maintain music and fine art programs, and provide necessary educational programs and materials to the extent funds are available, shall the Petaluma Joint Union High School District be authorized to levy a $50 annual parcel tax for four years, beginning July 1, 2005 with annual citizens' oversight commitee, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21989, "no_votes": 10330, "total_votes": 32319, "percent_yes": 68.03737739410253, "percent_no": 31.962622605897465, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.904314", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.712855", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep school libraries open, restore smaller class sizes grades 7-12, restore and maintain computer and technology programs, maintain music and fine art programs, and provide necessary educational programs and materials to the extent funds are available, shall the Petaluma Joint Union High School District be authorized to levy a $50 annual parcel tax for four years, beginning July 1, 2005 with annual citizens' oversight commitee, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8796, "fingerprint": "2004|200400697|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400697|SONOMA", "content_hash": "90120e2de12cb998", "measure_id": "200400697", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds to construct a multi-purpose room for the use by the school and the Liberty Valley Community, including for assembly, dining and athletics, and to upgrade technology and communications at Liberty Elementary School, shall the Liberty School District issue $1,920,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit; with no money for teacher or administrator salaries or operating expenses, and shall the District establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 618, "no_votes": 341, "total_votes": 959, "percent_yes": 64.44212721584984, "percent_no": 35.55787278415016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.903876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.712670", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds to construct a multi-purpose room for the use by the school and the Liberty Valley Community, including for assembly, dining and athletics, and to upgrade technology and communications at Liberty Elementary School, shall the Liberty School District issue $1,920,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit; with no money for teacher or administrator salaries or operating expenses, and shall the District establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8789, "fingerprint": "2004|200400357|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400357|SONOMA", "content_hash": "b9cde1e1a78c8712", "measure_id": "200400357", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain local streets, fix potholes, accelerate widening Highway 101, improve interchanges, restore and enhance transit, support development of passenger rail, and build safe bike/pedestrian routes, shall the Sonoma County Transportation Authority be authorized to levy a 1/4 cent retail transactions and use tax on the projects proposed, and issue bonds to finance the projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140557, "no_votes": 68671, "total_votes": 209228, "percent_yes": 67.17886707324068, "percent_no": 32.82113292675932, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.900586", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.711253", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain local streets, fix potholes, accelerate widening Highway 101, improve interchanges, restore and enhance transit, support development of passenger rail, and build safe bike/pedestrian routes, shall the Sonoma County Transportation Authority be authorized to levy a 1/4 cent retail transactions and use tax on the projects proposed, and issue bonds to finance the projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8790, "fingerprint": "2004|200400358|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400358|SONOMA", "content_hash": "929ef2b6aa8d327b", "measure_id": "200400358", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Without increasing local taxes, and in a manner consistent with Sonoma County's General Plan and zoning ordinance, shall public bodies be authorized to develop, construct, or acquire housing units affordable to low-income persons, including elderly and disabled persons, within the County's unincorporated area, either directly or by assisting private projects, in an annual amount not exeeding one-half of one percent (1/2%) of the housing units existing in the unincorporated area in that year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34462, "no_votes": 32177, "total_votes": 66639, "percent_yes": 51.71446150152313, "percent_no": 48.28553849847687, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.901119", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.711431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing local taxes, and in a manner consistent with Sonoma County's General Plan and zoning ordinance, shall public bodies be authorized to develop, construct, or acquire housing units affordable to low-income persons, including elderly and disabled persons, within the County's unincorporated area, either directly or by assisting private projects, in an annual amount not exeeding one-half of one percent (1/2%) of the housing units existing in the unincorporated area in that year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8788, "fingerprint": "2004|200400356|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400356|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9b49a78b30e061d4", "measure_id": "200400356", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To 1) Improve and expand Santa Rosa Fire, Police and Paramedic services; 2) Combat gang violence, and 3) Expand crime prevention and after-school youth programs, shall Santa Rosa voters approve a 1/4 cent public safety sales tax, expiring in twenty years, with annual public reports by a citizen oversight committee assuring that funds are expended only for these purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41315, "no_votes": 17513, "total_votes": 58828, "percent_yes": 70.23016250764942, "percent_no": 29.769837492350575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.900320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.711074", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To 1) Improve and expand Santa Rosa Fire, Police and Paramedic services; 2) Combat gang violence, and 3) Expand crime prevention and after-school youth programs, shall Santa Rosa voters approve a 1/4 cent public safety sales tax, expiring in twenty years, with annual public reports by a citizen oversight committee assuring that funds are expended only for these purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8791, "fingerprint": "2004|200400578|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400578|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e7784e8d045deaa5", "measure_id": "200400578", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the City of Cotati adopt a measure to restrict retail business uses in Cotati?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1301, "no_votes": 2057, "total_votes": 3358, "percent_yes": 38.743299583085175, "percent_no": 61.256700416914825, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.901683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.711617", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the City of Cotati adopt a measure to restrict retail business uses in Cotati?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8792, "fingerprint": "2004|200400579|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400579|SONOMA", "content_hash": "25982d3eaa156355", "measure_id": "200400579", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Healdsburg be authorized to increase the existing hotel tax, paid by guests and collected by hotel operators, from the current rate of 10% of the room rate to a maximum of 12% of the room rate, with the revenue from said increase being placed in the City's general fund, approximately 95% of which is allocated to police and fire protection services in the current budget year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3674, "no_votes": 1452, "total_votes": 5126, "percent_yes": 71.67381974248927, "percent_no": 28.326180257510728, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.902124", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.711910", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Healdsburg be authorized to increase the existing hotel tax, paid by guests and collected by hotel operators, from the current rate of 10% of the room rate to a maximum of 12% of the room rate, with the revenue from said increase being placed in the City's general fund, approximately 95% of which is allocated to police and fire protection services in the current budget year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8793, "fingerprint": "2004|200400580|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400580|SONOMA", "content_hash": "806f1a0af002bb2c", "measure_id": "200400580", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Petaluma Municipal Code Chapter 1.30 be amended to revise existing mandatory limits on campaign contributions to City Council and City Mayor canididates and revise the existing mandatory public disclosure requirements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15458, "no_votes": 7833, "total_votes": 23291, "percent_yes": 66.36898372762012, "percent_no": 33.63101627237988, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.902563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.712108", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Petaluma Municipal Code Chapter 1.30 be amended to revise existing mandatory limits on campaign contributions to City Council and City Mayor canididates and revise the existing mandatory public disclosure requirements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8794, "fingerprint": "2004|200400581|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400581|SONOMA", "content_hash": "fd8abcfceffa1818", "measure_id": "200400581", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you support urging the City Council to pursue the design, environmental analysis, funding and construction of a cross-town connector and interchange connecting Petaluma Boulevard North with the intersection of Rainier Avenue and North McDowell Boulevard?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17759, "no_votes": 6877, "total_votes": 24636, "percent_yes": 72.08556583861017, "percent_no": 27.914434161389835, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.903003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.712297", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you support urging the City Council to pursue the design, environmental analysis, funding and construction of a cross-town connector and interchange connecting Petaluma Boulevard North with the intersection of Rainier Avenue and North McDowell Boulevard?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8795, "fingerprint": "2004|200400582|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400582|SONOMA", "content_hash": "bfe9398c2eed20c2", "measure_id": "200400582", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City increase the Sales Tax by 0.125% with the proceeds of the tax to be deposited in the General Fund, to be used for all general governmental needs to the City including, but not limited to, capital equipment requirements, fire protection, street maintenance, park maintenance, and police services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2779, "no_votes": 1306, "total_votes": 4085, "percent_yes": 68.02937576499389, "percent_no": 31.970624235006113, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.903440", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.712482", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the Sales Tax by 0.125% with the proceeds of the tax to be deposited in the General Fund, to be used for all general governmental needs to the City including, but not limited to, capital equipment requirements, fire protection, street maintenance, park maintenance, and police services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8803, "fingerprint": "2004|200400585|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400585|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "e75977b53ea6f49a", "measure_id": "200400585", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance of the City of Oakdale authorizing the increase in the rate of the City's existing Transient Occupancy Tax from  7% to 10% be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2158, "no_votes": 3396, "total_votes": 5554, "percent_yes": 38.85487936622254, "percent_no": 61.14512063377746, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.907181", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.713939", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance of the City of Oakdale authorizing the increase in the rate of the City's existing Transient Occupancy Tax from  7% to 10% be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8804, "fingerprint": "2004|200400586|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400586|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "f046ce1fa0742710", "measure_id": "200400586", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council adopt and ordinance which imposes an 8% tax on persons staying 30 days or less in hotels, motels, and similar lodgings within the city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1806, "no_votes": 644, "total_votes": 2450, "percent_yes": 73.71428571428571, "percent_no": 26.285714285714292, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.907618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.714115", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council adopt and ordinance which imposes an 8% tax on persons staying 30 days or less in hotels, motels, and similar lodgings within the city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8806, "fingerprint": "2004|200400588|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400588|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "0f6356d7580fba1b", "measure_id": "200400588", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be Appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 990, "no_votes": 779, "total_votes": 1769, "percent_yes": 55.96382136800452, "percent_no": 44.03617863199548, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.908595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.714477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be Appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8801, "fingerprint": "2004|200400583|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400583|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "2d8f334ed88fd384", "measure_id": "200400583", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following described area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan? \"Robertson Road Infill Area\" :The unincorporated area generally located south of Robertson Road, east of Carpenter Road, west of Hays Street, and north of John Street containing 334 parcels on 96.8 acres.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36532, "no_votes": 21463, "total_votes": 57995, "percent_yes": 62.99163721010432, "percent_no": 37.00836278989568, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.906299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.713576", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following described area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan? \"Robertson Road Infill Area\" :The unincorporated area generally located south of Robertson Road, east of Carpenter Road, west of Hays Street, and north of John Street containing 334 parcels on 96.8 acres.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8809, "fingerprint": "2004|200400701|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400701|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "f075f394c5b726d3", "measure_id": "200400701", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Modesto Junior College and Columbia College students for jobs and four-year colleges, repair buildings, and increase access to educational opportunities by repairing, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, science labs, establishing new and expanded college education centers in Turlock, Oakdale, Patterson and Calaveras County, and acquiring land, modernizing classroom technology, shall Yosemite Community College District issue $326,174,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84403, "no_votes": 50388, "total_votes": 134791, "percent_yes": 62.617682189463686, "percent_no": 37.382317810536314, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.909901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.715016", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Modesto Junior College and Columbia College students for jobs and four-year colleges, repair buildings, and increase access to educational opportunities by repairing, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, science labs, establishing new and expanded college education centers in Turlock, Oakdale, Patterson and Calaveras County, and acquiring land, modernizing classroom technology, shall Yosemite Community College District issue $326,174,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8805, "fingerprint": "2004|200400587|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400587|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a6fa4c5afc5ce5f0", "measure_id": "200400587", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Turlock impose a one-half of one cent ($.005) transaction and use tax that expires on December 31, 2009?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9018, "no_votes": 9148, "total_votes": 18166, "percent_yes": 49.64218870417263, "percent_no": 50.35781129582737, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.908125", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.714300", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Turlock impose a one-half of one cent ($.005) transaction and use tax that expires on December 31, 2009?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8808, "fingerprint": "2004|200400700|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400700|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "f271f175fcf1bf55", "measure_id": "200400700", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Hughson Unified School District upgrade and construct additional classrooms, labs, and facilities, improve student access to computers and technology, upgrade outdated restrooms, sewer and plumbing systems, make health and safety improvements, upgrade fire alarms, renovate electrical systems, replace roofing, and become eligible to receive $6,900,000 in State grants by issuing $14,300,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2788, "no_votes": 1358, "total_votes": 4146, "percent_yes": 67.24553786782441, "percent_no": 32.75446213217559, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.909462", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.714837", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Hughson Unified School District upgrade and construct additional classrooms, labs, and facilities, improve student access to computers and technology, upgrade outdated restrooms, sewer and plumbing systems, make health and safety improvements, upgrade fire alarms, renovate electrical systems, replace roofing, and become eligible to receive $6,900,000 in State grants by issuing $14,300,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8802, "fingerprint": "2004|200400584|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400584|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "bfd979055d341612", "measure_id": "200400584", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Newman advise the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors to direct urban development into the incorporated cities of our county?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1088, "no_votes": 644, "total_votes": 1732, "percent_yes": 62.8175519630485, "percent_no": 37.1824480369515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.906736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.713758", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Newman advise the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors to direct urban development into the incorporated cities of our county?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8807, "fingerprint": "2004|200400699|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400699|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "f724c4e76c1b1fda", "measure_id": "200400699", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall trustee areas in the Ceres Unified School District be abolished?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6769, "no_votes": 3654, "total_votes": 10423, "percent_yes": 64.94291470785762, "percent_no": 35.057085292142375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.909030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.714657", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall trustee areas in the Ceres Unified School District be abolished?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8798, "fingerprint": "2004|200400050|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400050|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "d9a48541b96066cf", "measure_id": "200400050", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Ordinance of the County of Stanislaus authorizing a limited transactions and use tax of one-eighth of one percent for a period of not more than eight years commencing on July 1, 2005, be used exclusively to maintain countywide library hours, provide purchases of new books, access to technology, maintain story times, programs for children and teens, reference, and other programs, be enacted to extend the current tax until June 30, 2013?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53621, "no_votes": 20972, "total_votes": 74593, "percent_yes": 71.88476130468007, "percent_no": 28.11523869531993, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.904841", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.713036", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance of the County of Stanislaus authorizing a limited transactions and use tax of one-eighth of one percent for a period of not more than eight years commencing on July 1, 2005, be used exclusively to maintain countywide library hours, provide purchases of new books, access to technology, maintain story times, programs for children and teens, reference, and other programs, be enacted to extend the current tax until June 30, 2013?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8799, "fingerprint": "2004|200400229|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400229|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "825235544e396377", "measure_id": "200400229", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to build a new Riverbank High School Gymnasium and Performing Arts building, modernize and improve school facilities, and needed classrooms throughout the District and build an elementary school, shall the Riverbank Unified School District issue $14 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a Citizen's Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1328, "no_votes": 828, "total_votes": 2156, "percent_yes": 61.59554730983302, "percent_no": 38.40445269016698, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.905396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.713219", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to build a new Riverbank High School Gymnasium and Performing Arts building, modernize and improve school facilities, and needed classrooms throughout the District and build an elementary school, shall the Riverbank Unified School District issue $14 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a Citizen's Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8800, "fingerprint": "2004|200400230|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400230|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "2933b9f59c264bfa", "measure_id": "200400230", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Valley Home Joint Elementary School District prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $1.4 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 222, "no_votes": 137, "total_votes": 359, "percent_yes": 61.83844011142061, "percent_no": 38.16155988857939, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.905844", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.713398", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Valley Home Joint Elementary School District prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $1.4 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8810, "fingerprint": "2004|200400231|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400231|SUTTER", "content_hash": "05d70e507fa759b6", "measure_id": "200400231", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide Franklin Elementary School with a modern, new multipurpose structure, housing a gymnasium, kitchen, library, indoor and outdoor stage area and upgraded administrative offices; in conjunction with making major safety modifications to the parking and traffic patterns at the front of the school, shall the Franklin Elementary School District issue bonds in the amount of $2,200,000 with an interest rate within the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 554, "no_votes": 335, "total_votes": 889, "percent_yes": 62.31721034870641, "percent_no": 37.68278965129359, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.910343", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.715199", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide Franklin Elementary School with a modern, new multipurpose structure, housing a gymnasium, kitchen, library, indoor and outdoor stage area and upgraded administrative offices; in conjunction with making major safety modifications to the parking and traffic patterns at the front of the school, shall the Franklin Elementary School District issue bonds in the amount of $2,200,000 with an interest rate within the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8811, "fingerprint": "2004|200400232|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400232|SUTTER", "content_hash": "95fdf225dff7b7f6", "measure_id": "200400232", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make the District eligible for up to $8.4 million in State matching funds to acquire a site, construct and equip a new high school, acquire a site for new elementary school and for expansion and improvement projects at Luther Elementary School including the construction of ten additional classrooms, shall the Live Oak Unified School District be authorized to issue $8,400,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 961, "no_votes": 554, "total_votes": 1515, "percent_yes": 63.43234323432343, "percent_no": 36.56765676567657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.910788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.715377", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make the District eligible for up to $8.4 million in State matching funds to acquire a site, construct and equip a new high school, acquire a site for new elementary school and for expansion and improvement projects at Luther Elementary School including the construction of ten additional classrooms, shall the Live Oak Unified School District be authorized to issue $8,400,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8814, "fingerprint": "2004|200400703|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400703|SUTTER", "content_hash": "972338a89837253c", "measure_id": "200400703", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To avoid further overcrowding by building one new elementary school and to improve the learning environment of students and teachers by adding air conditioning where it is needed shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2004-1 of the Yuba City Unified School District be authorized to repair, replace, construct and renovate school facilities and equipment and issue $25,670,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee appointed to monitor the way all bond funds are spent? This measure will authorize a tax sufficient for interest on, and redemption of, the bonds.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9383, "no_votes": 6346, "total_votes": 15729, "percent_yes": 59.65414203064403, "percent_no": 40.34585796935597, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.912315", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.715926", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid further overcrowding by building one new elementary school and to improve the learning environment of students and teachers by adding air conditioning where it is needed shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2004-1 of the Yuba City Unified School District be authorized to repair, replace, construct and renovate school facilities and equipment and issue $25,670,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee appointed to monitor the way all bond funds are spent? This measure will authorize a tax sufficient for interest on, and redemption of, the bonds.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8813, "fingerprint": "2004|200400702|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400702|SUTTER", "content_hash": "9b8339934245c68a", "measure_id": "200400702", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to construct necessary infrastructure including a classroom wing, a library/media center, a cafeteria/gymnasium and Agriculture classrooms, provide other school facilities, qualify for state matching funds, and meet the educational needs of current students as well as position the District to be able to continue to meet the future needs of a growing student body and community, shall the Sutter Union High School District incur bonded indebtedness of $8,260,000 at interest rates within legal limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1885, "no_votes": 1153, "total_votes": 3038, "percent_yes": 62.04739960500329, "percent_no": 37.95260039499671, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.911875", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.715746", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to construct necessary infrastructure including a classroom wing, a library/media center, a cafeteria/gymnasium and Agriculture classrooms, provide other school facilities, qualify for state matching funds, and meet the educational needs of current students as well as position the District to be able to continue to meet the future needs of a growing student body and community, shall the Sutter Union High School District incur bonded indebtedness of $8,260,000 at interest rates within legal limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8812, "fingerprint": "2004|200400359|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400359|SUTTER", "content_hash": "17caced888cfcd9a", "measure_id": "200400359", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Do you approve of planning for commercial, industrial, and residential development in the current South Sutter Industrial/Commercial Reserve if the following planning standards are met? At least 3600 acres would be provided for commercial and industrial parks to create new jobs in Sutter County as a condition of having residential units approved. At least 1000 acres would be provided for schools, parks, open space, libraries, retail areas and other community facilities paid for by the development. No more then 2900 acres would be availabe for residential construction on land protected, at a minimum, from a 100-year flood event, resulting in an estimated population of 39,00. All necessary road, bridge, water, drainage, sewer and other improvements would be paid for by the development, without reducing current service levels. Developers would sign binding contracts to assure these planning requirements are met.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16397, "no_votes": 11357, "total_votes": 27754, "percent_yes": 59.079772285076025, "percent_no": 40.920227714923975, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.911343", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.715555", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Do you approve of planning for commercial, industrial, and residential development in the current South Sutter Industrial/Commercial Reserve if the following planning standards are met? At least 3600 acres would be provided for commercial and industrial parks to create new jobs in Sutter County as a condition of having residential units approved. At least 1000 acres would be provided for schools, parks, open space, libraries, retail areas and other community facilities paid for by the development. No more then 2900 acres would be availabe for residential construction on land protected, at a minimum, from a 100-year flood event, resulting in an estimated population of 39,00. All necessary road, bridge, water, drainage, sewer and other improvements would be paid for by the development, without reducing current service levels. Developers would sign binding contracts to assure these planning requirements are met.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1157, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1135|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1135|Statewide", "content_hash": "0dac3b6f3f0acf3b", "measure_id": "CA1135", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1A", "description": "Protection of Local Government Revenues", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 83.69999695, "percent_no": 16.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | State Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure prohibits the state from requiring local governments to provide ...", "summary_text": "This measure prohibits the state from requiring local governments to provide new programs or higher levels of service without providing funding to cover the costs, and prevents the state from taking local government revenues to fund state programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1A", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1A_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201A%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201A%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1156, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1134|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1134|Statewide", "content_hash": "84d7d58bd498bb10", "measure_id": "CA1134", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 59", "description": "Public Records, Open Meetings. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 83.40000153, "percent_no": 16.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Local Government | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment strengthened California's public records and op...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment strengthened California's public records and open meetings laws by expanding public access to government documents and proceedings. The measure enhanced transparency requirements for state and local government agencies.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 59", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_59_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2059%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2059%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1155, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1133|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1133|Statewide", "content_hash": "be364d4138d7207f", "measure_id": "CA1133", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 60A", "description": "Surplus Property. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.30000305, "percent_no": 26.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure requires the state to offer surplus property for sale to local g...", "summary_text": "This measure requires the state to offer surplus property for sale to local governments, school districts, and special districts before offering it to private parties, and allows these public entities to purchase the property at below-market rates. If no public entity purchases the property, it can then be sold on the open market.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 60A", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_60A_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2060A%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2060A%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1154, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1132|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1132|Statewide", "content_hash": "78e20f8999867796", "measure_id": "CA1132", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 58", "description": "The California Balanced Budget Act. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.19999695, "percent_no": 28.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended California's constitution to require the state to mainta...", "summary_text": "This measure amended California's constitution to require the state to maintain a balanced budget by prohibiting expenditures from exceeding revenues in any fiscal year. It established constitutional requirements for fiscal responsibility in state government spending.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 58", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_58_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2058%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2058%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1153, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1131|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1131|Statewide", "content_hash": "0f3a253ddd70bf02", "measure_id": "CA1131", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 60", "description": "Election Rights of Political Parties. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.59999847, "percent_no": 32.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the California Constitution to allow political parties t...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the California Constitution to allow political parties to determine whether to hold open or closed primary elections for partisan offices, giving parties the choice of whether to allow only registered party members or all voters to participate in selecting their nominees.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 60", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_60_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2060%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2060%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1152, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1130|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1130|Statewide", "content_hash": "881d5ed2edda7339", "measure_id": "CA1130", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 57", "description": "The Economic Recovery Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.40000153, "percent_no": 36.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Budgets\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 57", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_57_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2057%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2057%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1151, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1129|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1129|Statewide", "content_hash": "ebe527d091adf32c", "measure_id": "CA1129", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 69", "description": "DNA Samples. Collection. Database. Funding. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.09999847, "percent_no": 37.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required all adults convicted of any felony and all juveniles co...", "summary_text": "This measure required all adults convicted of any felony and all juveniles convicted of specified felonies to provide DNA samples for inclusion in the state's DNA database. It also expanded the database to include DNA samples from adults arrested for certain serious crimes and provided funding for DNA testing through fees and penalties.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 69", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_69_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2069%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2069%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1150, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1128|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1128|Statewide", "content_hash": "06a9fbaefccb9408", "measure_id": "CA1128", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 71", "description": "Stem Cell Research. Funding. Bonds. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.09999847, "percent_no": 40.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure established the California Institute for Regenerative Med...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure established the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine and authorized the state to issue $3 billion in bonds to fund stem cell research and research facilities. It created a new state agency to oversee the distribution of grants for stem cell research, including embryonic stem cell research.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 71", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_71_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2071%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2071%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1149, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1127|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1127|Statewide", "content_hash": "4cfa3e9ff7487efb", "measure_id": "CA1127", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 64", "description": "Limitations on Enforcement of Unfair Business Competition Laws. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.0, "percent_no": 41.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure restricted who can file lawsuits under California's Unfai...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure restricted who can file lawsuits under California's Unfair Competition Law by requiring plaintiffs to show they suffered actual injury or economic loss, rather than allowing any member of the public to sue. It also prohibited attorneys from receiving contingency fees in these cases unless their clients suffered actual losses.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 64", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_64_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2064%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2064%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1148, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1126|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1126|Statewide", "content_hash": "925787f25b9b54f4", "measure_id": "CA1126", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 61", "description": "Children's Hospital Projects. Grant Program. Bond Act. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.29999924, "percent_no": 41.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $750 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $750 million in general obligation bonds to fund grants for construction, expansion, renovation, and equipment purchases at qualifying children's hospitals in California. The bonds would be repaid through the state's General Fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 61", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_61_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2061%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2061%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1147, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1125|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1125|Statewide", "content_hash": "01a1751425b36b02", "measure_id": "CA1125", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 63", "description": "Mental Health Services Expansion and Funding. Tax on Incomes over $1 Million. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.79999924, "percent_no": 46.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a 1% tax on personal income over $1 million to fund expa...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a 1% tax on personal income over $1 million to fund expanded mental health services in California. The generated revenue would be dedicated to mental health programs and services throughout the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 63", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_63_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2063%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2063%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1146, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1124|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1124|Statewide", "content_hash": "353a9da832c51a7d", "measure_id": "CA1124", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 55", "description": "Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2004.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.90000153, "percent_no": 49.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $12", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $12.3 billion in general obligation bonds to fund construction, renovation, and improvement of public education facilities from kindergarten through university level. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 55", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_55_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2055%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2055%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1145, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1123|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1123|Statewide", "content_hash": "f27c2684892e3a53", "measure_id": "CA1123", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 72", "description": "Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendments to Health Care Coverage Requirements.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.09999847, "percent_no": 50.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | Insurance | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This referendum sought to overturn 2003 legislative amendments that expanded ...", "summary_text": "This referendum sought to overturn 2003 legislative amendments that expanded health care coverage requirements for insurance plans in California. A \"yes\" vote would have repealed the expanded coverage mandates, while a \"no\" vote kept the new requirements in place.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 72", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_72_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2072%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2072%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1144, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1122|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1122|Statewide", "content_hash": "38760586ed0225ff", "measure_id": "CA1122", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 66", "description": "Limitations on \"Three Strikes\" Law. Sex Crimes. Punishment. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.29999924, "percent_no": 52.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have limited California's \"Three Strikes\" law by requiring...", "summary_text": "This measure would have limited California's \"Three Strikes\" law by requiring that the third strike be a serious or violent felony, rather than any felony, while maintaining life sentences for third strikes involving specified sex crimes against children. It would have allowed some inmates previously sentenced under the existing Three Strikes law to petition for resentencing under the revised standards.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 66", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_66_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2066%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2066%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1143, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1121|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1121|Statewide", "content_hash": "d3e3b742e67af8dc", "measure_id": "CA1121", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 62", "description": "Elections. Primaries. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.09999847, "percent_no": 53.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment would have replaced California's partisan prima...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment would have replaced California's partisan primary system with a blanket primary where all candidates appear on one ballot and the top two vote-getters advance to the general election, regardless of party affiliation. It would have applied to all state and federal offices except president and local nonpartisan races.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 62", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_62_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2062%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2062%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1142, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1120|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1120|Statewide", "content_hash": "b8f39c3745e97fbf", "measure_id": "CA1120", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 65", "description": "Local Government Funds and Revenues. State Mandates. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.59999847, "percent_no": 62.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures | Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have prohibited the state from borrowing or taking ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have prohibited the state from borrowing or taking local government property tax, sales tax, and other revenues to balance the state budget, while also restricting the state's ability to impose new mandates on local governments without providing funding. The measure aimed to protect local government funding from state budget shortfalls and ensure that state-mandated programs come with adequate state funding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 65", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_65_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2065%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2065%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1141, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1119|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1119|Statewide", "content_hash": "f2d7853c88a573fd", "measure_id": "CA1119", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 56", "description": "State Budget, Related Taxes and Reserve. Voting Requirements. Penalties. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.29999924, "percent_no": 65.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required a two-thirds vote of the legislature to pass...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required a two-thirds vote of the legislature to pass state budgets and most tax increases, and would have established penalties for legislators if budgets were not passed on time. It also would have created requirements for state budget reserves and spending limits tied to population growth and inflation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 56", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_56_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2056%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2056%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1140, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1118|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1118|Statewide", "content_hash": "2b3a588b83c93072", "measure_id": "CA1118", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 67", "description": "Emergency and Medical Services. Funding. Telephone Surcharge. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 28.39999962, "percent_no": 71.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Health | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have imposed a telephone surcharge to fund emergenc...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have imposed a telephone surcharge to fund emergency and medical services in California. The measure failed with 28.4% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 67", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_67_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2067%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2067%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1139, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1117|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1117|Statewide", "content_hash": "92b95d9831418c0e", "measure_id": "CA1117", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 70", "description": "Tribal Gaming Compacts. Exclusive Gaming Rights. Contributions to State. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 23.70000076, "percent_no": 76.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries | State-Tribal Relations\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have amended California's constitution to allow cer...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have amended California's constitution to allow certain Native American tribes to operate slot machines and card games at casinos on their lands in exchange for making payments to the state. The measure would have granted these tribes exclusive rights to operate such gaming facilities outside of existing card rooms and racetracks.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 70", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_70_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2070%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2070%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1138, "fingerprint": "2004|CA1116|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|CA1116|Statewide", "content_hash": "cf087bd2637e42b1", "measure_id": "CA1116", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 68", "description": "Tribal Gaming Compact Renegotiation. Non-Tribal Commercial Gambling Expansion. Revenues, Tax Exemptions. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 16.20000076, "percent_no": 83.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries | State-Tribal Relations\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required renegotiation of tribal gaming compacts and ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required renegotiation of tribal gaming compacts and allowed the expansion of non-tribal commercial gambling, while addressing gaming revenues and tax exemptions. It was a constitutional amendment and statute that failed with only 16.2% voter support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 68", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_68_(2004)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2004/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2004", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2068%202004", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2068%202004", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 8815, "fingerprint": "2004|200400360|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400360|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "c67da629b35636a2", "measure_id": "200400360", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) If measure B imposing a general pupose transactions and use tax is appproved by the voters of Tehama County, should the Tehama County Board of Supervisors distribute the proceeds from that tax to the County and to the incorporated cities in proportion to their respective populations to fund law enforcement and fire protection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10811, "no_votes": 10860, "total_votes": 21671, "percent_yes": 49.88694568778552, "percent_no": 50.11305431221448, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.912622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.716109", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If measure B imposing a general pupose transactions and use tax is appproved by the voters of Tehama County, should the Tehama County Board of Supervisors distribute the proceeds from that tax to the County and to the incorporated cities in proportion to their respective populations to fund law enforcement and fire protection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8816, "fingerprint": "2004|200400361|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400361|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "c35afadab8ede09a", "measure_id": "200400361", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Tehama County adopt a temporary one-half percent sales tax increase for three years, the proceeds of which would be placed in the County's general fund and used for general governmental purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6041, "no_votes": 16189, "total_votes": 22230, "percent_yes": 27.17498875393612, "percent_no": 72.82501124606388, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.912935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.716290", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Tehama County adopt a temporary one-half percent sales tax increase for three years, the proceeds of which would be placed in the County's general fund and used for general governmental purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8817, "fingerprint": "2004|200400362|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400362|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "63b0954623de5cb0", "measure_id": "200400362", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended, effective January 8, 2007, to: (1) separate the elected offices of Tehama County Coroner and Public Administrator;(2) make the office of Tehama County Public Administrator an appointed office; and (3) consolidate the office of Tehama County Public Administrator with the office of Tehama County Public Guardian?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8879, "no_votes": 12245, "total_votes": 21124, "percent_yes": 42.03275894716909, "percent_no": 57.96724105283091, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.913208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.716470", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Tehama County Charter be amended, effective January 8, 2007, to: (1) separate the elected offices of Tehama County Coroner and Public Administrator;(2) make the office of Tehama County Public Administrator an appointed office; and (3) consolidate the office of Tehama County Public Administrator with the office of Tehama County Public Guardian?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8818, "fingerprint": "2004|200400589|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400589|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "0446b6e0a7c7e443", "measure_id": "200400589", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinanace be adopted amending the City's existing transient occupancy tax to increase the tax charged to occupants of hotels and motels from ten percent (10%) to twelve (12%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1401, "no_votes": 2742, "total_votes": 4143, "percent_yes": 33.81607530774801, "percent_no": 66.18392469225199, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.913479", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.716660", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinanace be adopted amending the City's existing transient occupancy tax to increase the tax charged to occupants of hotels and motels from ten percent (10%) to twelve (12%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11866, "fingerprint": "2004|200400704|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400704|TULARE", "content_hash": "b5442647e742b4c0", "measure_id": "200400704", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Martin Macareno be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1057, "no_votes": 398, "total_votes": 1455, "percent_yes": 72.64604810996563, "percent_no": 27.353951890034367, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.863166", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.917820", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.719400", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Martin Macareno be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8826, "fingerprint": "2004|200400269|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400269|TULARE", "content_hash": "cc15e7c23beac961", "measure_id": "200400269", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Conrado Gonzales be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 761, "no_votes": 215, "total_votes": 976, "percent_yes": 77.97131147540983, "percent_no": 22.028688524590166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.915787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.718100", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Conrado Gonzales be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11867, "fingerprint": "2004|200400705|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400705|TULARE", "content_hash": "2e39890b35adbac3", "measure_id": "200400705", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Blanca Sandoval be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1044, "no_votes": 395, "total_votes": 1439, "percent_yes": 72.55038220986796, "percent_no": 27.449617790132038, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.863501", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.918092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.719585", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Blanca Sandoval be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8827, "fingerprint": "2004|200400270|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400270|TULARE", "content_hash": "4ff9418a56806161", "measure_id": "200400270", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Antonio Ramos be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 747, "no_votes": 225, "total_votes": 972, "percent_yes": 76.85185185185185, "percent_no": 23.148148148148152, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.916050", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.718277", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Antonio Ramos be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8834, "fingerprint": "2004|200400707|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400707|TULARE", "content_hash": "bc4c7921c87a292c", "measure_id": "200400707", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Traver Elementary School District: Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $700,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 136, "no_votes": 63, "total_votes": 199, "percent_yes": 68.34170854271356, "percent_no": 31.65829145728644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.918732", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.719950", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Traver Elementary School District: Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $700,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8833, "fingerprint": "2004|200400706|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400706|TULARE", "content_hash": "f5ac5b46c53243d8", "measure_id": "200400706", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Hanford High School Overcrowding Measure: To reduce overcrowding in local high schools, improve student safety and expand job training programs by constructing, acquiring and equipping a new high school, classrooms, technical and vocational training classrooms, sites, facilities, installing fire safety equipment and replacing outdated computers and technology, repairing schools, qualifying for State matching funds, shall Hanford Joint Union High School District issue $33,500,000 of bonds, at legal rates, require annual financial audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44, "no_votes": 38, "total_votes": 82, "percent_yes": 53.65853658536586, "percent_no": 46.34146341463414, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.918361", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.719770", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Hanford High School Overcrowding Measure: To reduce overcrowding in local high schools, improve student safety and expand job training programs by constructing, acquiring and equipping a new high school, classrooms, technical and vocational training classrooms, sites, facilities, installing fire safety equipment and replacing outdated computers and technology, repairing schools, qualifying for State matching funds, shall Hanford Joint Union High School District issue $33,500,000 of bonds, at legal rates, require annual financial audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8820, "fingerprint": "2004|200400233|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400233|TULARE", "content_hash": "ede6ce00dbcc65c7", "measure_id": "200400233", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "College of the Sequoias Job Training, Repair Measure: To prepare students for skilled jobs, four-year colleges, train nurses, police, firefighters, accommodate population growth by: Repairing, upgrading leaky roofs, aging classrooms, computer wiring, ventilation, plumbing, sewers; Improving fire safety, security; Remove hazardous materials; Acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, training/education centers in Hanford, Tulare, Visalia, shall Sequoias Community College District issue $95,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21451, "no_votes": 20853, "total_votes": 42304, "percent_yes": 50.70678895612708, "percent_no": 49.29321104387292, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.914110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.717021", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "College of the Sequoias Job Training, Repair Measure: To prepare students for skilled jobs, four-year colleges, train nurses, police, firefighters, accommodate population growth by: Repairing, upgrading leaky roofs, aging classrooms, computer wiring, ventilation, plumbing, sewers; Improving fire safety, security; Remove hazardous materials; Acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, sites, training/education centers in Hanford, Tulare, Visalia, shall Sequoias Community College District issue $95,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8821, "fingerprint": "2004|200400234|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400234|TULARE", "content_hash": "98de64c5597a269e", "measure_id": "200400234", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Repair our aging schools, relieve overcrowding, improve the learning environment and keep our children safe and healthy by: Modernizing or replacing classrooms, restrooms, locker rooms, offices and site work.  Improving school safety, security, energy efficiency and accessibility.  Building new classrooms, gymnasium, multipurpose room, offices, restrooms and library.  Shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $6,400,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, independent audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 627, "no_votes": 344, "total_votes": 971, "percent_yes": 64.57260556127703, "percent_no": 35.42739443872297, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.914381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.717202", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Repair our aging schools, relieve overcrowding, improve the learning environment and keep our children safe and healthy by: Modernizing or replacing classrooms, restrooms, locker rooms, offices and site work.  Improving school safety, security, energy efficiency and accessibility.  Building new classrooms, gymnasium, multipurpose room, offices, restrooms and library.  Shall Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $6,400,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, independent audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8825, "fingerprint": "2004|200400238|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400238|TULARE", "content_hash": "41d15d6b3d391e68", "measure_id": "200400238", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To obtain approximately $16 million in already approved State matching funds and qualify for additional State  matching funds, which will be used to refurbish aging local schools and construct, acquire, furnish and equip new classrooms and school facilities, and to provide a pool for community use, shall the Visalia Unified School District issue $25,600,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to citizens' oversight, independent audits and with no funds used for administrator or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12602, "no_votes": 11371, "total_votes": 23973, "percent_yes": 52.56747173903975, "percent_no": 47.43252826096025, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.915519", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.717921", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To obtain approximately $16 million in already approved State matching funds and qualify for additional State  matching funds, which will be used to refurbish aging local schools and construct, acquire, furnish and equip new classrooms and school facilities, and to provide a pool for community use, shall the Visalia Unified School District issue $25,600,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to citizens' oversight, independent audits and with no funds used for administrator or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8824, "fingerprint": "2004|200400237|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400237|TULARE", "content_hash": "829e8964ad42b6c8", "measure_id": "200400237", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to meet the educational needs of Tulare's growing high school age population and support Tulare's economic growth, shall the Tulare Joint Union High School District build a new high school and other related facilities and modernize the Tulare Western High School Swim Complex, and shall the district issue $45 million of bonds at the lowest competitive interest rates within legal limits so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizen's advisory committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6298, "no_votes": 2800, "total_votes": 9098, "percent_yes": 69.22400527588482, "percent_no": 30.77599472411518, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.915248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.717740", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to meet the educational needs of Tulare's growing high school age population and support Tulare's economic growth, shall the Tulare Joint Union High School District build a new high school and other related facilities and modernize the Tulare Western High School Swim Complex, and shall the district issue $45 million of bonds at the lowest competitive interest rates within legal limits so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizen's advisory committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8822, "fingerprint": "2004|200400235|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400235|TULARE", "content_hash": "1f68f08df29a2972", "measure_id": "200400235", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Kingsburg Joint Union Elementary School District acquire a site and construct a new elementary school, upgrade fire alarm systems, repair leaking roofs, upgrade electrical wiring for computers, install security locks, upgrade heating, ventilation and cooling systems, repair, construct and equip classrooms, restrooms, and other facilities; qualify for State matching funds by issuing $7,500,000 of bonds at legal rates with guaranteed annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for staff salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 138, "no_votes": 69, "total_votes": 207, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.914651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.717381", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Kingsburg Joint Union Elementary School District acquire a site and construct a new elementary school, upgrade fire alarm systems, repair leaking roofs, upgrade electrical wiring for computers, install security locks, upgrade heating, ventilation and cooling systems, repair, construct and equip classrooms, restrooms, and other facilities; qualify for State matching funds by issuing $7,500,000 of bonds at legal rates with guaranteed annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for staff salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8823, "fingerprint": "2004|200400236|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400236|TULARE", "content_hash": "f9e2532d1d1d962b", "measure_id": "200400236", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Traver Joint Elementary School District: Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $700,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit.  Funds received from this bond will serve as a match for \"State of California Joint Use Funds\" for which the Traver JESD qualifies for.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 116, "no_votes": 43, "total_votes": 159, "percent_yes": 72.95597484276729, "percent_no": 27.04402515723271, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.914919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.717558", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Traver Joint Elementary School District: Prepare for future growth and provide facilities that best serve the students and community by constructing and equipping a multipurpose building and by issuing $700,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit.  Funds received from this bond will serve as a match for \"State of California Joint Use Funds\" for which the Traver JESD qualifies for.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8819, "fingerprint": "2004|200400123|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400123|TULARE", "content_hash": "61ec4149d9d1f8d6", "measure_id": "200400123", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "VISALIA POLICE, FIRE, AND PUBLIC SAFETY/9-1-1 MEASURE. Shall Visalia voters enact a one-quarter cent sales tax, with citizens advisory committee oversight and independent annual audits to: improve 9-1-1 police/fire response time; expand programs to reduce gang violence, drug trafficking and graffiti; increase number of police officers/firefighters; build neighborhood police/fire stations and firefighter training center; improve hazardous material/bomb squad response times; repair/upgrade outdated public safety building/emergency 9-1-1 dispatch center?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13822, "no_votes": 6882, "total_votes": 20704, "percent_yes": 66.76004636785163, "percent_no": 33.23995363214837, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.913764", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.716839", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VISALIA POLICE, FIRE, AND PUBLIC SAFETY/9-1-1 MEASURE. Shall Visalia voters enact a one-quarter cent sales tax, with citizens advisory committee oversight and independent annual audits to: improve 9-1-1 police/fire response time; expand programs to reduce gang violence, drug trafficking and graffiti; increase number of police officers/firefighters; build neighborhood police/fire stations and firefighter training center; improve hazardous material/bomb squad response times; repair/upgrade outdated public safety building/emergency 9-1-1 dispatch center?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8829, "fingerprint": "2004|200400590|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400590|TULARE", "content_hash": "573d94696a065ddc", "measure_id": "200400590", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "City of Farmersville Revenue Measure Part 1.  Shall Farmersville voters enact a one half cent sales tax with independent annual audits, to partially ensure essential government functions, including police, fire and other general fund service will continue in the future, providing a supplement to existing general fund revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 921, "no_votes": 524, "total_votes": 1445, "percent_yes": 63.73702422145329, "percent_no": 36.26297577854671, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.916581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.718639", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Farmersville Revenue Measure Part 1.  Shall Farmersville voters enact a one half cent sales tax with independent annual audits, to partially ensure essential government functions, including police, fire and other general fund service will continue in the future, providing a supplement to existing general fund revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8830, "fingerprint": "2004|200400591|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400591|TULARE", "content_hash": "38af1e8409cbd8ee", "measure_id": "200400591", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "City of Farmersville Revenue Measure Part 2.  Shall Farmersville voters enact a 4% utility user's tax with independent audits, to partially ensure essential government functions, including police, fire and other general fund service will continue in the future, providing a supplement to existing general fund revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 744, "no_votes": 698, "total_votes": 1442, "percent_yes": 51.59500693481276, "percent_no": 48.40499306518724, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.916932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.718855", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Farmersville Revenue Measure Part 2.  Shall Farmersville voters enact a 4% utility user's tax with independent audits, to partially ensure essential government functions, including police, fire and other general fund service will continue in the future, providing a supplement to existing general fund revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8831, "fingerprint": "2004|200400592|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400592|TULARE", "content_hash": "872a846999729d37", "measure_id": "200400592", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended changing position titles; clarifying Council can attend joint meetings hosted by other public entities; revising some requirements for ordinances; allowing printing of ordinance summaries after introduction; naming Finance Director as Purchasing Agent; separating City Engineer and Director of Public Works; changing Public Works Director's authority; allowing Council to designate the business week and hours; and removing the term limit on park concession leases?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4983, "no_votes": 4774, "total_votes": 9757, "percent_yes": 51.07102593010146, "percent_no": 48.92897406989854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.917277", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.719040", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended changing position titles; clarifying Council can attend joint meetings hosted by other public entities; revising some requirements for ordinances; allowing printing of ordinance summaries after introduction; naming Finance Director as Purchasing Agent; separating City Engineer and Director of Public Works; changing Public Works Director's authority; allowing Council to designate the business week and hours; and removing the term limit on park concession leases?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8832, "fingerprint": "2004|200400593|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400593|TULARE", "content_hash": "23ecbb4697847b97", "measure_id": "200400593", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Woodlake voters enact a one half-cent sales and use tax, for a period of 10 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 561, "no_votes": 394, "total_votes": 955, "percent_yes": 58.7434554973822, "percent_no": 41.2565445026178, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.917549", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.719219", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Woodlake voters enact a one half-cent sales and use tax, for a period of 10 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8828, "fingerprint": "2004|200400363|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400363|TULARE", "content_hash": "d9613390cbaa1aed", "measure_id": "200400363", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Goshen Community Services District's powers be expanded for the purposes of recreation, including but not limited to aquatic parks and recreational harbors, equestrian trails, playgrounds, golf courses, and swimming pools, and for street lighting?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 325, "no_votes": 44, "total_votes": 369, "percent_yes": 88.07588075880759, "percent_no": 11.924119241192415, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.916314", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.718453", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Goshen Community Services District's powers be expanded for the purposes of recreation, including but not limited to aquatic parks and recreational harbors, equestrian trails, playgrounds, golf courses, and swimming pools, and for street lighting?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8838, "fingerprint": "2004|200400708|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400708|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "f075f394c5b726d3", "measure_id": "200400708", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Modesto Junior College and Columbia College students for jobs and four-year colleges, repair buildings, and increase access to educational opportunities by repairing, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, science labs, establishing new and expanded college education centers in Turlock, Oakdale, Patterson and Calaveras County, and acquiring land, modernizing classroom technology, shall Yosemite Community College District issue $326,174,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14048, "no_votes": 10928, "total_votes": 24976, "percent_yes": 56.24599615631006, "percent_no": 43.75400384368994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.919917", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.720664", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Modesto Junior College and Columbia College students for jobs and four-year colleges, repair buildings, and increase access to educational opportunities by repairing, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, science labs, establishing new and expanded college education centers in Turlock, Oakdale, Patterson and Calaveras County, and acquiring land, modernizing classroom technology, shall Yosemite Community College District issue $326,174,000 in bonds, at legal rates, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8835, "fingerprint": "2004|200400239|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400239|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "d370e0eb34b573dc", "measure_id": "200400239", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide for the needs of our students and community shall the Columbia Union School District construct a multi-use facility with restrooms, a warm-up kitchen and concession area, and other projects identified on the district master facilities plan and qualify the District to receive $650,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $3,700,000 of bonds at a rate within legal limits, with annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1351, "no_votes": 1053, "total_votes": 2404, "percent_yes": 56.19800332778701, "percent_no": 43.80199667221299, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.919004", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.720127", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide for the needs of our students and community shall the Columbia Union School District construct a multi-use facility with restrooms, a warm-up kitchen and concession area, and other projects identified on the district master facilities plan and qualify the District to receive $650,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $3,700,000 of bonds at a rate within legal limits, with annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8836, "fingerprint": "2004|200400279|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400279|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "6e8cea45326adcfe", "measure_id": "200400279", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 762 of the City of Sonora authorizing the City Council to impose a special purpose transaction and use tax at a rate of .50% be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 812, "no_votes": 302, "total_votes": 1114, "percent_yes": 72.89048473967684, "percent_no": 27.109515260323164, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-08-31", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.919370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.720305", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 762 of the City of Sonora authorizing the City Council to impose a special purpose transaction and use tax at a rate of .50% be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8837, "fingerprint": "2004|200400364|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400364|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "3ed046e485f004e5", "measure_id": "200400364", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2559 which amends Chapter 3.32 of the Tuolumne County Ordinance Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from eight percent to nine percent, and applying the transient occupancy Tax to camping sites and other lodging provided that the rate on camping sites and other lodging be phased in at two percent the first year, five percent the second year, and a total of nine percent the third and subsequent years be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10409, "no_votes": 12481, "total_votes": 22890, "percent_yes": 45.474006116207946, "percent_no": 54.525993883792054, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.919645", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.720484", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2559 which amends Chapter 3.32 of the Tuolumne County Ordinance Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax rate from eight percent to nine percent, and applying the transient occupancy Tax to camping sites and other lodging provided that the rate on camping sites and other lodging be phased in at two percent the first year, five percent the second year, and a total of nine percent the third and subsequent years be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8842, "fingerprint": "2004|200400365|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400365|VENTURA", "content_hash": "dc4c32d1899227e7", "measure_id": "200400365", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Ventura County Regional Open Space District be created and established; an ordinance become operative, establishing a one quarter percent (0.25%) sales tax in Ventura County for a period not longer than ten years for purposes of agricultural land preservation and acquisition of open space land and parkland under an Expenditure Plan with administrative expenses limited to 3%; and an appropriations limit for the District and citizens' Fiscal Oversight Committee be established?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134784, "no_votes": 141803, "total_votes": 276587, "percent_yes": 48.73114065375452, "percent_no": 51.26885934624548, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.921142", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.721416", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ventura County Regional Open Space District be created and established; an ordinance become operative, establishing a one quarter percent (0.25%) sales tax in Ventura County for a period not longer than ten years for purposes of agricultural land preservation and acquisition of open space land and parkland under an Expenditure Plan with administrative expenses limited to 3%; and an appropriations limit for the District and citizens' Fiscal Oversight Committee be established?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8843, "fingerprint": "2004|200400366|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400366|VENTURA", "content_hash": "c4ae14792bc4eb03", "measure_id": "200400366", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance establishing a one half percent (0.5%) countywide sales tax increase and spending limit in Ventura County to: maintain local streets and fix potholes; reduce traffic congestion, widen and improve safety on highways 101, 118, 126 and 23; expand Metrolink and upgrade railroad crossings; expand bus services and lower senior and disabled fares; improve access to CSUCI; and construct bicycle paths become effective and operative?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115251, "no_votes": 160968, "total_votes": 276219, "percent_yes": 41.72450121099562, "percent_no": 58.27549878900438, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.921415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.721598", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance establishing a one half percent (0.5%) countywide sales tax increase and spending limit in Ventura County to: maintain local streets and fix potholes; reduce traffic congestion, widen and improve safety on highways 101, 118, 126 and 23; expand Metrolink and upgrade railroad crossings; expand bus services and lower senior and disabled fares; improve access to CSUCI; and construct bicycle paths become effective and operative?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11868, "fingerprint": "2004|200400598|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400598|VENTURA", "content_hash": "3df95dcd71012ac8", "measure_id": "200400598", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The City's Managed Growth Plan expires December 31, 2004.  Shall the new Managed Growth Plan, to be effective until December 31, 2012 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32051, "no_votes": 9919, "total_votes": 41970, "percent_yes": 76.36645222778175, "percent_no": 23.63354777221825, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.868797", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.922890", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.722504", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The City's Managed Growth Plan expires December 31, 2004.  Shall the new Managed Growth Plan, to be effective until December 31, 2012 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8841, "fingerprint": "2004|200400242|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400242|VENTURA", "content_hash": "02d896fee3e5c7fa", "measure_id": "200400242", "measure_letter": "C4", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational quality shall Simi Valley Unified School District repair and renovate schools throughout the District, including upgrading deteriorating plumbing and electrical systems, making health and safety improvements, upgrading classrooms and libraries to improve access to technology, constructing additional classrooms to relieve overcrowding, enabling the District to receive up to $62 million in state grants by issuing $145 million of bonds within legal interest rates, annual audits, citizens oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16118, "no_votes": 9961, "total_votes": 26079, "percent_yes": 61.80451704436519, "percent_no": 38.19548295563481, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.920860", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.721231", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational quality shall Simi Valley Unified School District repair and renovate schools throughout the District, including upgrading deteriorating plumbing and electrical systems, making health and safety improvements, upgrading classrooms and libraries to improve access to technology, constructing additional classrooms to relieve overcrowding, enabling the District to receive up to $62 million in state grants by issuing $145 million of bonds within legal interest rates, annual audits, citizens oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8840, "fingerprint": "2004|200400241|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400241|VENTURA", "content_hash": "a6c9be75fb3ad057", "measure_id": "200400241", "measure_letter": "D4", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To protect high quality education at our neighborhood schools and reduce the impact of unprecedented budget cuts on classroom instruction by retaining qualified teachers, avoiding class size increases, maintaining up-to-date textbooks and preserving essential academic programs that enhance student achievement shall Oak Park Unified School District assess $197 per parcel annually for Five (5) years with an exemption for seniors, annual audits, independent citizen oversight, no proceeds for administrator salaries and all funds remaining in Oak Park to benefit local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3763, "no_votes": 863, "total_votes": 4626, "percent_yes": 81.34457414613057, "percent_no": 18.65542585386943, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.920519", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.721052", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To protect high quality education at our neighborhood schools and reduce the impact of unprecedented budget cuts on classroom instruction by retaining qualified teachers, avoiding class size increases, maintaining up-to-date textbooks and preserving essential academic programs that enhance student achievement shall Oak Park Unified School District assess $197 per parcel annually for Five (5) years with an exemption for seniors, annual audits, independent citizen oversight, no proceeds for administrator salaries and all funds remaining in Oak Park to benefit local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11869, "fingerprint": "2004|200400709|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400709|VENTURA", "content_hash": "8ec890fa2c359661", "measure_id": "200400709", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Fillmore School Construction and Upgrade Measure.  In order to provide necessary facilities and technology comparable to other school districts, shall the Fillmore Unified School District repair termite damage, upgrade aging electrical, plumbing, technology, fire safety systems, security lighting; repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, restrooms facilities; satisfy facility safety standards, increase student safety, and qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $10,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, and guaranteed annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3650, "no_votes": 1720, "total_votes": 5370, "percent_yes": 67.97020484171323, "percent_no": 32.029795158286774, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.869143", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.923170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.722687", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Fillmore School Construction and Upgrade Measure.  In order to provide necessary facilities and technology comparable to other school districts, shall the Fillmore Unified School District repair termite damage, upgrade aging electrical, plumbing, technology, fire safety systems, security lighting; repair, construct, acquire, equip classrooms, restrooms facilities; satisfy facility safety standards, increase student safety, and qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $10,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with independent citizen oversight, and guaranteed annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8839, "fingerprint": "2004|200400240|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400240|VENTURA", "content_hash": "5a9f197062c45acc", "measure_id": "200400240", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To avoid deeper cuts to neighborhood schools caused by California's fiscal crisis, which will compromise essential programs including reading, math, science, music, and art; to retain quality teachers, avoid even larger classes, and maintain up-to-date textbooks and instructional materials, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District assess $98 per parcel annually for four years, with exemption available for seniors, and independent oversight committee, no money for administrative salaries, and every dollar staying in our community to preserve quality education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 439, "no_votes": 169, "total_votes": 608, "percent_yes": 72.20394736842105, "percent_no": 27.796052631578945, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.920188", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.720873", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid deeper cuts to neighborhood schools caused by California's fiscal crisis, which will compromise essential programs including reading, math, science, music, and art; to retain quality teachers, avoid even larger classes, and maintain up-to-date textbooks and instructional materials, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District assess $98 per parcel annually for four years, with exemption available for seniors, and independent oversight committee, no money for administrative salaries, and every dollar staying in our community to preserve quality education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8844, "fingerprint": "2004|200400594|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400594|VENTURA", "content_hash": "3fa1d31c36bf5f56", "measure_id": "200400594", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to modify the City of Ojai's Municipal Code provisions relating to the Business License Tax in order to make the tax amount variable based on the type and size of business and to increase general tax revenues to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1784, "no_votes": 1689, "total_votes": 3473, "percent_yes": 51.3676936366254, "percent_no": 48.6323063633746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.921689", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.721784", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to modify the City of Ojai's Municipal Code provisions relating to the Business License Tax in order to make the tax amount variable based on the type and size of business and to increase general tax revenues to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8845, "fingerprint": "2004|200400595|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400595|VENTURA", "content_hash": "599d63572d00b727", "measure_id": "200400595", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Ojai allow the development and construction, with local or state financial assistance, of low to moderate income senior citizen rental housing not to exceed in the aggregate 50 dwelling units?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2302, "no_votes": 1257, "total_votes": 3559, "percent_yes": 64.68109019387468, "percent_no": 35.31890980612532, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.921963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.721962", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Ojai allow the development and construction, with local or state financial assistance, of low to moderate income senior citizen rental housing not to exceed in the aggregate 50 dwelling units?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8849, "fingerprint": "2004|200400711|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400711|VENTURA", "content_hash": "dcf827f14bbbf523", "measure_id": "200400711", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and renovate every high school in the District, relieve student overcrowding by building and acquiring high schools and classrooms throughout the District and become eligible for State matching funds, shall Oxnard Union High School District issue $135 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates provided spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and not transferred to the State?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52851, "no_votes": 31473, "total_votes": 84324, "percent_yes": 62.67610644656325, "percent_no": 37.32389355343675, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.923934", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.723045", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and renovate every high school in the District, relieve student overcrowding by building and acquiring high schools and classrooms throughout the District and become eligible for State matching funds, shall Oxnard Union High School District issue $135 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rates provided spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee, no money is used for administrative salaries and all funds are spent locally and not transferred to the State?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8848, "fingerprint": "2004|200400710|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400710|VENTURA", "content_hash": "6f911e4e6eb3f989", "measure_id": "200400710", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize Hueneme School District elementary and junior high school buildings and grounds by funding improvements that include repairing or replacing leaky roofs; expanding school libraries to make room for books and materials; renovating bathroom facilities at each school; to establish an independent oversight committee, and to qualify for State matching funds, shall the Hueneme School District issue up to $17,100,000 in bonds, at the lowest available interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8681, "no_votes": 3051, "total_votes": 11732, "percent_yes": 73.99420388680532, "percent_no": 26.005796113194677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.923657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.722866", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize Hueneme School District elementary and junior high school buildings and grounds by funding improvements that include repairing or replacing leaky roofs; expanding school libraries to make room for books and materials; renovating bathroom facilities at each school; to establish an independent oversight committee, and to qualify for State matching funds, shall the Hueneme School District issue up to $17,100,000 in bonds, at the lowest available interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8846, "fingerprint": "2004|200400596|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400596|VENTURA", "content_hash": "3f3f08a578b479cc", "measure_id": "200400596", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance (Ordinance No. 1117) of the City of Santa Paula authorizing the imposition of a Utility User Tax at a flat rate of six dollars ($6) per utility be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2886, "no_votes": 4476, "total_votes": 7362, "percent_yes": 39.20130399348003, "percent_no": 60.79869600651997, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.922234", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.722143", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance (Ordinance No. 1117) of the City of Santa Paula authorizing the imposition of a Utility User Tax at a flat rate of six dollars ($6) per utility be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8847, "fingerprint": "2004|200400597|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400597|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e43a52f259dea472", "measure_id": "200400597", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the ordinance (Ordinance No. 1118) advising the City of Santa Paula regarding the expenditure of new Utility User Tax revenue be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3102, "no_votes": 4151, "total_votes": 7253, "percent_yes": 42.76850958224183, "percent_no": 57.23149041775817, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.922616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.722324", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the ordinance (Ordinance No. 1118) advising the City of Santa Paula regarding the expenditure of new Utility User Tax revenue be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8850, "fingerprint": "2004|200400124|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400124|YOLO", "content_hash": "bcfb849c0abaf88d", "measure_id": "200400124", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2138, which would authorize the City of Davis to impose and collect a one-half cent sales tax (transactions and use tax) for general government purposes from July 1, 2004 until December 31, 2010 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12847, "no_votes": 5894, "total_votes": 18741, "percent_yes": 68.55023744730804, "percent_no": 31.449762552691965, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.924205", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.723222", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2138, which would authorize the City of Davis to impose and collect a one-half cent sales tax (transactions and use tax) for general government purposes from July 1, 2004 until December 31, 2010 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8853, "fingerprint": "2004|200400243|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400243|YOLO", "content_hash": "4a8a880d4ae4a6ab", "measure_id": "200400243", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "West Sacramento New High-School Measure. In order to eliminate overcrowding and provide all West Sacramento high school students equal access to academic excellence, college preparation, employment/vocational opportunities, modern classrooms, laboratories, other academic facilities; and qualify for State matching funds, shall the Washington Unified School District acquire land, construct and equip a new comprehensive high school by issuing $52,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5213, "no_votes": 2365, "total_votes": 7578, "percent_yes": 68.79123779361309, "percent_no": 31.208762206386908, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.925710", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.724117", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "West Sacramento New High-School Measure. In order to eliminate overcrowding and provide all West Sacramento high school students equal access to academic excellence, college preparation, employment/vocational opportunities, modern classrooms, laboratories, other academic facilities; and qualify for State matching funds, shall the Washington Unified School District acquire land, construct and equip a new comprehensive high school by issuing $52,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8851, "fingerprint": "2004|200400125|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400125|YOLO", "content_hash": "c959ac633b6efce0", "measure_id": "200400125", "measure_letter": "R1", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city council members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5566, "no_votes": 1839, "total_votes": 7405, "percent_yes": 75.16542876434842, "percent_no": 24.83457123565158, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.924523", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.723400", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city council members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11870, "fingerprint": "2004|200400126|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400126|YOLO", "content_hash": "51bc78433c3b3a90", "measure_id": "200400126", "measure_letter": "R2", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4260, "no_votes": 2301, "total_votes": 6561, "percent_yes": 64.92912665752172, "percent_no": 35.07087334247828, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.870865", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.924797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.723576", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11871, "fingerprint": "2004|200400127|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400127|YOLO", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "200400127", "measure_letter": "R3", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2866, "no_votes": 3344, "total_votes": 6210, "percent_yes": 46.15136876006441, "percent_no": 53.84863123993559, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.871201", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.925071", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.723760", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11872, "fingerprint": "2004|200400599|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400599|YOLO", "content_hash": "a50e681189753fdc", "measure_id": "200400599", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "May low rent housing be developed, constructed or acquired with public finds within the City of Davis in an amount that does not exceed 50 units annually, with any units not developed carrying over to the next year's allotment, except that the total allotment shall never exceed 150 units, and the authorization granted by this measure shall expire in 2025?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16473, "no_votes": 11478, "total_votes": 27951, "percent_yes": 58.935279596436615, "percent_no": 41.064720403563385, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.872240", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.926046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.724299", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "May low rent housing be developed, constructed or acquired with public finds within the City of Davis in an amount that does not exceed 50 units annually, with any units not developed carrying over to the next year's allotment, except that the total allotment shall never exceed 150 units, and the authorization granted by this measure shall expire in 2025?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8852, "fingerprint": "2004|200400128|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400128|YOLO", "content_hash": "fce6ef0a76459220", "measure_id": "200400128", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance establishing a Regional Flood Control Project Policy for the City of Woodland and prohibiting the City from funding or taking any action that supports the Lower Cache Creek Flood Barrier or a substantially similar structure be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6917, "no_votes": 4089, "total_votes": 11006, "percent_yes": 62.84753770670544, "percent_no": 37.15246229329456, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.925339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.723937", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance establishing a Regional Flood Control Project Policy for the City of Woodland and prohibiting the City from funding or taking any action that supports the Lower Cache Creek Flood Barrier or a substantially similar structure be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8854, "fingerprint": "2004|200400600|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400600|YOLO", "content_hash": "b63cc47e97a08260", "measure_id": "200400600", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of West Sacramento increase the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel and motel guests from 8% to 12% for general governmental purposes, including but not limited to, funding for enhancements to the City's downtown, including expanded police enforcement, intensive street landscaping, incentives for restaurants, shops, public areas, and cultural facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8282, "no_votes": 3800, "total_votes": 12082, "percent_yes": 68.54825360039727, "percent_no": 31.451746399602726, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.926324", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.724477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of West Sacramento increase the transient occupancy tax paid by hotel and motel guests from 8% to 12% for general governmental purposes, including but not limited to, funding for enhancements to the City's downtown, including expanded police enforcement, intensive street landscaping, incentives for restaurants, shops, public areas, and cultural facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8855, "fingerprint": "2004|200400712|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400712|YOLO", "content_hash": "4f57bce9099cdfc4", "measure_id": "200400712", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education in Walnut Grove, Courtland, and Clarksburg, shall the School Facilities improvement District No. 2 of River Delta Unified School District construct, upgrade, and improve classrooms and school facilities, upgrade electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, renovate restrooms and plumbing, replace heating and air conditioning, make health and safety improvements, and qualify for State grants by issuing $9,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 441, "no_votes": 165, "total_votes": 606, "percent_yes": 72.77227722772277, "percent_no": 27.227722772277232, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.926595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.724659", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education in Walnut Grove, Courtland, and Clarksburg, shall the School Facilities improvement District No. 2 of River Delta Unified School District construct, upgrade, and improve classrooms and school facilities, upgrade electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, renovate restrooms and plumbing, replace heating and air conditioning, make health and safety improvements, and qualify for State grants by issuing $9,000,000 in bonds, with interest within legal limits, annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8856, "fingerprint": "2004|200400051|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400051|YUBA", "content_hash": "10e497dfeecdde14", "measure_id": "200400051", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) In order to maintain summer recreation swimming programs, youth and adult swimming lessons, high school team water sports, Red Cross water safety programs, keep the Marysville High School swimming pool open to the public, and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee, would you support the Marysville Joint Unified School District in Levying a Parcel Tax of fifteen dollars ($15.00), exempting those sixty-five (65) years old or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5510, "no_votes": 5445, "total_votes": 10955, "percent_yes": 50.29666818804199, "percent_no": 49.70333181195801, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.926903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.724842", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) In order to maintain summer recreation swimming programs, youth and adult swimming lessons, high school team water sports, Red Cross water safety programs, keep the Marysville High School swimming pool open to the public, and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee, would you support the Marysville Joint Unified School District in Levying a Parcel Tax of fifteen dollars ($15.00), exempting those sixty-five (65) years old or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8858, "fingerprint": "2004|200400367|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400367|YUBA", "content_hash": "d474cb4d691fe2c6", "measure_id": "200400367", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Loma Rica-Browns Valley Community Services District increase its existing special tax from $0.03 per square foot on taxed structures to $0.06 per square foot (with a minimum of $24.00 per structure and a maximum cap not to exceed $200.00 per structure). Commencing with the fiscal year 2005/2006 this increase will be used to support the increasing cost of operating the District's fire department operations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1062, "no_votes": 1206, "total_votes": 2268, "percent_yes": 46.82539682539682, "percent_no": 53.17460317460318, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.927555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.725281", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Loma Rica-Browns Valley Community Services District increase its existing special tax from $0.03 per square foot on taxed structures to $0.06 per square foot (with a minimum of $24.00 per structure and a maximum cap not to exceed $200.00 per structure). Commencing with the fiscal year 2005/2006 this increase will be used to support the increasing cost of operating the District's fire department operations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8860, "fingerprint": "2004|200400601|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400601|YUBA", "content_hash": "dcb207c145d224c2", "measure_id": "200400601", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Marysville be amended, effective January 1, 2005, to revise the provisions related to the filing of vacancies in the office of mayor and the city council to make consistent with procedures outlined in state law, eliminate the 30-day residency requirements for council candidates, delete certain obsoleted provisions, and make clerical and administrative changes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1719, "no_votes": 1356, "total_votes": 3075, "percent_yes": 55.90243902439025, "percent_no": 44.09756097560975, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.928107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.725646", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Marysville be amended, effective January 1, 2005, to revise the provisions related to the filing of vacancies in the office of mayor and the city council to make consistent with procedures outlined in state law, eliminate the 30-day residency requirements for council candidates, delete certain obsoleted provisions, and make clerical and administrative changes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8859, "fingerprint": "2004|200400368|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400368|YUBA", "content_hash": "73e6d4a6e22e4a02", "measure_id": "200400368", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a 15 cent per ton resource depletion surcharge on mined aggregate and sand and manufactured asphalt concrete be imposed on those businesses engaged in the mining of sand and gravel from land within Yuba County and/or manufacturing asphalt concrete within Yuba County, and thereby providing revenue solely for construction, repair and maintenance of County roads and city roads within the incorporated areas of the County, subject to appropriation at the sole discretion of the Yuba County Board of Supervisors? No more than three percent (3%) of the surcharge amount collected annually may be used for administration", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10702, "no_votes": 5289, "total_votes": 15991, "percent_yes": 66.92514539428429, "percent_no": 33.074854605715714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.927829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.725463", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a 15 cent per ton resource depletion surcharge on mined aggregate and sand and manufactured asphalt concrete be imposed on those businesses engaged in the mining of sand and gravel from land within Yuba County and/or manufacturing asphalt concrete within Yuba County, and thereby providing revenue solely for construction, repair and maintenance of County roads and city roads within the incorporated areas of the County, subject to appropriation at the sole discretion of the Yuba County Board of Supervisors? No more than three percent (3%) of the surcharge amount collected annually may be used for administration", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8861, "fingerprint": "2004|200400602|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400602|YUBA", "content_hash": "07fbd7a735c4a4df", "measure_id": "200400602", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "City of Wheatland Excise Tax on New Development. Shall City of Wheatland Ordinance No. 384 be adopted, which imposes an excise tax (subject to certain exemptions) on persons issued a building permit in the amount of one percent of the valuation of construction work under the permit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 579, "no_votes": 388, "total_votes": 967, "percent_yes": 59.87590486039297, "percent_no": 40.12409513960703, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-11-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.928375", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.725855", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Wheatland Excise Tax on New Development. Shall City of Wheatland Ordinance No. 384 be adopted, which imposes an excise tax (subject to certain exemptions) on persons issued a building permit in the amount of one percent of the valuation of construction work under the permit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8857, "fingerprint": "2004|200400052|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2004|200400052|YUBA", "content_hash": "4bc930d2c6ea43a0", "measure_id": "200400052", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2004, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) In order to establish a Regional Park System to maintain and improve park and recreation facilities in Yuba county, keep the Beckworth Park Boat Landing Facility open, the Marysville High School Pool open, and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee, should the Yuba County Board of Supervisors be directed to place an Annual Parcel Tax Measure of twenty-five dollars ($25.00), exempting those sixty-five (65) years old or older, on the November 2, 2004 ballot for voter consideration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5217, "no_votes": 5713, "total_votes": 10930, "percent_yes": 47.73101555352241, "percent_no": 52.26898444647759, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2004-03-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.927188", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.725022", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) In order to establish a Regional Park System to maintain and improve park and recreation facilities in Yuba county, keep the Beckworth Park Boat Landing Facility open, the Marysville High School Pool open, and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee, should the Yuba County Board of Supervisors be directed to place an Annual Parcel Tax Measure of twenty-five dollars ($25.00), exempting those sixty-five (65) years old or older, on the November 2, 2004 ballot for voter consideration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11874, "fingerprint": "2003|200300149|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300149|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6416d411eb743bcd", "measure_id": "200300149", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve local school facilities, relieve overcrowding, and receive State matching  funds, provide alternative facilities for students struggling in school, and to replace deteriorated portables with permanent classrooms, renovate, acquire and/or construct school classrooms, sites and other facilities; shall New Haven Unified School District issue $120,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and all funds staying in our local community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3817, "no_votes": 1764, "total_votes": 5581, "percent_yes": 68.4, "percent_no": 31.599999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.875759", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.929881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.726578", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve local school facilities, relieve overcrowding, and receive State matching  funds, provide alternative facilities for students struggling in school, and to replace deteriorated portables with permanent classrooms, renovate, acquire and/or construct school classrooms, sites and other facilities; shall New Haven Unified School District issue $120,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and all funds staying in our local community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8862, "fingerprint": "2003|200300062|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300062|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "cd269a5c0d9130d3", "measure_id": "200300062", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To strengthen and improve essential academic curricula and educational programs for the District's students, shall the Emery Unified School District be authorized to levy, for 6 years only beginning July 1, 2003, an annual tax of $0.10 per square foot of  improved property or $50.00 per parcel, including vacant parcels, whichever is greater with an exemption for eligible property owners age 65 or over, and to appoint a Citizen's Fiscal Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 520, "no_votes": 152, "total_votes": 672, "percent_yes": 77.4, "percent_no": 22.599999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.928760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.726038", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To strengthen and improve essential academic curricula and educational programs for the District's students, shall the Emery Unified School District be authorized to levy, for 6 years only beginning July 1, 2003, an annual tax of $0.10 per square foot of  improved property or $50.00 per parcel, including vacant parcels, whichever is greater with an exemption for eligible property owners age 65 or over, and to appoint a Citizen's Fiscal Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11873, "fingerprint": "2003|200300109|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300109|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "379c1dec85f73ab0", "measure_id": "200300109", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of Livermore adopt an ordinance limiting both the mayor and city council members to terms totaling eight (8) consecutive years of service as mayor or city council member and reestablishing eligibility to serve after a break in service of two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8425, "no_votes": 6075, "total_votes": 14500, "percent_yes": 58.1, "percent_no": 41.9, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.875555", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.929506", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.726397", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of Livermore adopt an ordinance limiting both the mayor and city council members to terms totaling eight (8) consecutive years of service as mayor or city council member and reestablishing eligibility to serve after a break in service of two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8863, "fingerprint": "2003|200300063|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300063|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "353e51fe1af4993a", "measure_id": "200300063", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide revenue to maintain, restore and improve our excellent educational programs, such as math, science and reading, small class size, student support services, and clean and safe schools for our children shall the Newark Unified School District levy a special tax of $150 per parcel per year for five years, beginning on July 1, 2003 with an exemption for property owners age 65 and over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1626, "no_votes": 1666, "total_votes": 3292, "percent_yes": 49.4, "percent_no": 50.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.929195", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.726219", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide revenue to maintain, restore and improve our excellent educational programs, such as math, science and reading, small class size, student support services, and clean and safe schools for our children shall the Newark Unified School District levy a special tax of $150 per parcel per year for five years, beginning on July 1, 2003 with an exemption for property owners age 65 and over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8865, "fingerprint": "2003|200300041|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300041|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3b3eb4217ea44a47", "measure_id": "200300041", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide secure local funding for Orinda's K-8 schools, including to maintain small class sizes and neighborhood schools; to protect classroom programs, strong core academics, libraries, computer instruction, and literacy support; and to hire and retain qualified teachers; shall Orinda Union School District be authorized to replace its existing instructional parcel tax with a levy of three hundred eighty-five dollars per year per taxable parcel, with an annual independent audit and an exemption for eligible low-income seniors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5733, "no_votes": 1911, "total_votes": 7644, "percent_yes": 75.0, "percent_no": 25.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.930487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.726943", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide secure local funding for Orinda's K-8 schools, including to maintain small class sizes and neighborhood schools; to protect classroom programs, strong core academics, libraries, computer instruction, and literacy support; and to hire and retain qualified teachers; shall Orinda Union School District be authorized to replace its existing instructional parcel tax with a levy of three hundred eighty-five dollars per year per taxable parcel, with an annual independent audit and an exemption for eligible low-income seniors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8864, "fingerprint": "2003|200300040|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300040|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6c5b7728f20399bd", "measure_id": "200300040", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to build new schools to avoid classroom overcrowding throughout the Brentwood Union School District, to add new classrooms and buildings to existing sites, renovate and improve all schools, improve student security systems, acquire future school sites,  provide all students with access to technology, and for related purposes, shall the Brentwood Union School District issue $35 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2968, "no_votes": 1417, "total_votes": 4385, "percent_yes": 67.7, "percent_no": 32.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.930161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.726764", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to build new schools to avoid classroom overcrowding throughout the Brentwood Union School District, to add new classrooms and buildings to existing sites, renovate and improve all schools, improve student security systems, acquire future school sites,  provide all students with access to technology, and for related purposes, shall the Brentwood Union School District issue $35 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8866, "fingerprint": "2003|200300090|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300090|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "67781d182655d3b9", "measure_id": "200300090", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue repairing all of our schools, improve classroom safety, and relieve overcrowding, by: building additional classrooms; making seismic upgrades; repairing and renovating bathrooms and leaking roofs, and making fire safety, electrical, plumbing, heating and ventilation system improvements; shall the West Contra Costa Unified School District issue $450 million in bonds at legal rates and within authorized debt limits, to repair, acquire, construct and upgrade school facilities, with annual audits, a citizens oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11444, "no_votes": 7923, "total_votes": 19367, "percent_yes": 59.1, "percent_no": 40.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-09-16", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.930769", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.727127", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue repairing all of our schools, improve classroom safety, and relieve overcrowding, by: building additional classrooms; making seismic upgrades; repairing and renovating bathrooms and leaking roofs, and making fire safety, electrical, plumbing, heating and ventilation system improvements; shall the West Contra Costa Unified School District issue $450 million in bonds at legal rates and within authorized debt limits, to repair, acquire, construct and upgrade school facilities, with annual audits, a citizens oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8868, "fingerprint": "2003|200300150|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300150|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8d1edd6546a17dc0", "measure_id": "200300150", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain high quality teachers, provide for necessary educational programs and materials, keep school libraries open, avoid increased class sizes, and maintain counseling and music programs, shall the San Ramon Valley Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $90 per taxable parcel for five years only, beginning July 1, 2004, with independent annual audits and a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19134, "no_votes": 10076, "total_votes": 29210, "percent_yes": 65.5, "percent_no": 34.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.931383", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.727494", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain high quality teachers, provide for necessary educational programs and materials, keep school libraries open, avoid increased class sizes, and maintain counseling and music programs, shall the San Ramon Valley Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $90 per taxable parcel for five years only, beginning July 1, 2004, with independent annual audits and a complete exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8867, "fingerprint": "2003|200300110|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300110|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "59094e6188474621", "measure_id": "200300110", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the city of San Ramon adopt a zoning ordinance text amendment to continue to allow medical, firefighting, police and other emergency use heliports, subject to a use permit, and prohibit non-emergency use heliports throughout the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4942, "no_votes": 5704, "total_votes": 10646, "percent_yes": 46.400000000000006, "percent_no": 53.599999999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.931114", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.727310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city of San Ramon adopt a zoning ordinance text amendment to continue to allow medical, firefighting, police and other emergency use heliports, subject to a use permit, and prohibit non-emergency use heliports throughout the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8869, "fingerprint": "2003|200300082|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300082|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "cfeb1b25f501a6bc", "measure_id": "200300082", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $250.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 2003/04 and continuing each year thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82, "no_votes": 107, "total_votes": 189, "percent_yes": 43.4, "percent_no": 56.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.931656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.727924", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $250.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 2003/04 and continuing each year thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8872, "fingerprint": "2003|200300087|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300087|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "e10b37150352ded6", "measure_id": "200300087", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $15.00 on each parcel of real property commencing  with fiscal year 2003/04 and continuing each year thereafter?\"; and if the election passes by a 2/3rd majority the county Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing to annex additional parcels into the existing Zone of Benefit #98585 making the Zone boundaries coterminous with the Fire District Boundaries.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 438, "no_votes": 447, "total_votes": 885, "percent_yes": 49.5, "percent_no": 50.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-08-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.932516", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.728725", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $15.00 on each parcel of real property commencing  with fiscal year 2003/04 and continuing each year thereafter?\"; and if the election passes by a 2/3rd majority the county Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing to annex additional parcels into the existing Zone of Benefit #98585 making the Zone boundaries coterminous with the Fire District Boundaries.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8871, "fingerprint": "2003|200300084|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300084|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "8e51d56707c63366", "measure_id": "200300084", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $450.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 2003/04 and continuing each year thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19, "no_votes": 14, "total_votes": 33, "percent_yes": 57.6, "percent_no": 42.4, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-07-15", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.932247", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.728532", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $450.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 2003/04 and continuing each year thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8874, "fingerprint": "2003|200300089|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300089|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "7041a41924e8656a", "measure_id": "200300089", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $200.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 2003/04 and continuing each year thereafter?; and if the election passes by a 2/3rd majority the County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing to form the Shadow Lane Road Zone of Benefit #98101 and LAFCO will dissolve the Shadow Lane CSD.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 19, "percent_yes": 94.7, "percent_no": 5.299999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-08-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.933362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.729107", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $200.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 2003/04 and continuing each year thereafter?; and if the election passes by a 2/3rd majority the County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing to form the Shadow Lane Road Zone of Benefit #98101 and LAFCO will dissolve the Shadow Lane CSD.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8870, "fingerprint": "2003|200300083|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300083|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ab369fd497f7232b", "measure_id": "200300083", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $500.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with  fiscal year 2003/04 and continuing each year thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56, "no_votes": 49, "total_votes": 105, "percent_yes": 53.3, "percent_no": 46.7, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.931978", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.728336", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount not more than $500.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with  fiscal year 2003/04 and continuing each year thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8873, "fingerprint": "2003|200300088|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300088|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "f7e4394722b09806", "measure_id": "200300088", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the annual parcel tax be increased for $120.00 annually to $156.00 for fiscal year 2003/2004; $192.00 for fiscal year 2004/2005; $228.00 for fiscal year 2005/2006; $264.00 for fiscal year 2006/2007; and $300.00 for fiscal year 2007/2008 and each fiscal year thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 211, "no_votes": 254, "total_votes": 465, "percent_yes": 45.4, "percent_no": 54.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-08-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.932945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.728912", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the annual parcel tax be increased for $120.00 annually to $156.00 for fiscal year 2003/2004; $192.00 for fiscal year 2004/2005; $228.00 for fiscal year 2005/2006; $264.00 for fiscal year 2006/2007; and $300.00 for fiscal year 2007/2008 and each fiscal year thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11875, "fingerprint": "2003|200300151|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300151|FRESNO", "content_hash": "dcbcfe6e8cbbcc2a", "measure_id": "200300151", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Aurelio Leo Plasencia be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member Trustee Area No. 1 Coalinga-Huron Joint Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 237, "no_votes": 197, "total_votes": 434, "percent_yes": 54.6, "percent_no": 45.4, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.879327", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.934195", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.729647", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Aurelio Leo Plasencia be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member Trustee Area No. 1 Coalinga-Huron Joint Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8875, "fingerprint": "2003|200300111|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300111|FRESNO", "content_hash": "7891f8f2a656d941", "measure_id": "200300111", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Hilda Plasencia be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 222, "no_votes": 214, "total_votes": 436, "percent_yes": 50.9, "percent_no": 49.1, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.933650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.729288", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Hilda Plasencia be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8876, "fingerprint": "2003|200300112|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300112|FRESNO", "content_hash": "827ac5ef59c7ab26", "measure_id": "200300112", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ramon Dominquez be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 224, "no_votes": 209, "total_votes": 433, "percent_yes": 51.7, "percent_no": 48.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.933924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.729466", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ramon Dominquez be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8877, "fingerprint": "2003|200300064|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300064|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ad5493261edaa6dc", "measure_id": "200300064", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of reduction of class size and maintenance and enhancement of academic and educational  programs by levying a special tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of seven years, beginning July 1, 2003 and increase its appropriation limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1626, "no_votes": 992, "total_votes": 2618, "percent_yes": 62.1, "percent_no": 37.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.934542", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.729831", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of reduction of class size and maintenance and enhancement of academic and educational  programs by levying a special tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of seven years, beginning July 1, 2003 and increase its appropriation limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8878, "fingerprint": "2003|200300152|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300152|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "d4046f387801e83a", "measure_id": "200300152", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To address student safety and aging facilities, repair or replace unsafe buildings, meet health/safety/fire standards and improve electrical wiring systems, shall the El Centro Elementary School District issue general obligation bonds in the amount of $8 million to construct, renovate, repair, replace, acquire and equip school facilities, including classrooms and restrooms, with such bonds to be issued at interest rates within the legal limits and all proceeds administered by an independent citizens oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1493, "no_votes": 1029, "total_votes": 2522, "percent_yes": 59.2, "percent_no": 40.8, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.934851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.730015", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address student safety and aging facilities, repair or replace unsafe buildings, meet health/safety/fire standards and improve electrical wiring systems, shall the El Centro Elementary School District issue general obligation bonds in the amount of $8 million to construct, renovate, repair, replace, acquire and equip school facilities, including classrooms and restrooms, with such bonds to be issued at interest rates within the legal limits and all proceeds administered by an independent citizens oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8879, "fingerprint": "2003|200300153|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300153|KINGS", "content_hash": "7622cb9fe9759cfe", "measure_id": "200300153", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to meet the educational needs of Tulare's growing high school age population and support Tulare's economic growth, shall the Tulare Joint Union High School District build a new high school and other related facilities and modernize the Tulare Western High School Swim Complex and shall the district issue $45 million of bonds at the lowest competitive interest rates within legal limits so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizen's advisory committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14202, "no_votes": 1258, "total_votes": 15460, "percent_yes": 91.9, "percent_no": 8.099999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.935200", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.730196", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to meet the educational needs of Tulare's growing high school age population and support Tulare's economic growth, shall the Tulare Joint Union High School District build a new high school and other related facilities and modernize the Tulare Western High School Swim Complex and shall the district issue $45 million of bonds at the lowest competitive interest rates within legal limits so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizen's advisory committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8880, "fingerprint": "2003|200300092|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300092|LAKE", "content_hash": "c2e0a1373461ba31", "measure_id": "200300092", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Sales Tax Authority for Roadway Repairs impose a retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one-half percent (0.5%) for twenty (20) years within Lake County and the cities of Clearlake and Lakeport, and dedicated at least 85 percent of the money to fix potholes and repair and maintain local streets and roads, and the rest to pedestrian, bicycle, and bus improvements, with all expenditures subject to audits by a citizens' oversight committee and that the appropriations limit for fiscal year 2003/04 be set at $3,000,000, as required by California Constitution XIIIB.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4858, "no_votes": 4809, "total_votes": 9667, "percent_yes": 50.3, "percent_no": 49.7, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.935540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.730389", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sales Tax Authority for Roadway Repairs impose a retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one-half percent (0.5%) for twenty (20) years within Lake County and the cities of Clearlake and Lakeport, and dedicated at least 85 percent of the money to fix potholes and repair and maintain local streets and roads, and the rest to pedestrian, bicycle, and bus improvements, with all expenditures subject to audits by a citizens' oversight committee and that the appropriations limit for fiscal year 2003/04 be set at $3,000,000, as required by California Constitution XIIIB.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11876, "fingerprint": "2003|200300002|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300002|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "402f05393b6081ed", "measure_id": "200300002", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Albert Robles be recalled (removed) from the office of City Treasurer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6851, "no_votes": 1384, "total_votes": 8235, "percent_yes": 83.2, "percent_no": 16.799999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-01-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.881182", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.936104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.730752", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Albert Robles be recalled (removed) from the office of City Treasurer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8881, "fingerprint": "2003|200300001|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300001|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3b6cecc8149df59a", "measure_id": "200300001", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Maria Benavides be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6702, "no_votes": 1503, "total_votes": 8205, "percent_yes": 81.69999999999999, "percent_no": 18.30000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-01-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.935833", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.730571", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Maria Benavides be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8882, "fingerprint": "2003|200300003|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300003|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e7ea3e73002bdb4f", "measure_id": "200300003", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Raul Moriel be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6505, "no_votes": 1605, "total_votes": 8110, "percent_yes": 80.2, "percent_no": 19.799999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-01-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.936430", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.730930", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Raul Moriel be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8883, "fingerprint": "2003|200300004|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300004|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "46f9d4e7dad3221b", "measure_id": "200300004", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Xochilt Ruvalcaba be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6578, "no_votes": 1601, "total_votes": 8179, "percent_yes": 80.4, "percent_no": 19.599999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-01-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.936701", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.731109", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Xochilt Ruvalcaba be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11885, "fingerprint": "2003|200300156|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300156|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9555150152a2014c", "measure_id": "200300156", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide the children of the El Rancho Unified School District with school facilities and technology comparable to neighboring school districts, shall the District replace deteriorating plumbing, install air conditioning, security lighting and fencing, upgrade libraries and classroom technology, improve student safety in drop-off areas, provide handicapped access, and make other repairs and upgrades to all schools in the district by issuing $49,500,000 of bonds, with annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee at legal interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1788, "no_votes": 813, "total_votes": 2601, "percent_yes": 68.7, "percent_no": 31.299999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.889523", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.944564", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.736079", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the children of the El Rancho Unified School District with school facilities and technology comparable to neighboring school districts, shall the District replace deteriorating plumbing, install air conditioning, security lighting and fencing, upgrade libraries and classroom technology, improve student safety in drop-off areas, provide handicapped access, and make other repairs and upgrades to all schools in the district by issuing $49,500,000 of bonds, with annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee at legal interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11877, "fingerprint": "2003|200300015|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300015|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9f6057dc0a748c7c", "measure_id": "200300015", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter be amended to allow the City Council and the Board of Education the option to hold elections in which the primary or only method of voting is by mail, known as \"all-mail\" ballot elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6861, "no_votes": 7148, "total_votes": 14009, "percent_yes": 49.0, "percent_no": 51.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.884869", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.939578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.732968", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter be amended to allow the City Council and the Board of Education the option to hold elections in which the primary or only method of voting is by mail, known as \"all-mail\" ballot elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8884, "fingerprint": "2003|200300005|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300005|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d05885b6796d43d2", "measure_id": "200300005", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Chief of Police pass a Spanish language proficiency exam as a condition of employment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3163, "no_votes": 4984, "total_votes": 8147, "percent_yes": 38.8, "percent_no": 61.2, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-01-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.937045", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.731291", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Chief of Police pass a Spanish language proficiency exam as a condition of employment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8901, "fingerprint": "2003|200300154|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300154|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5dcacf3da5fbbc25", "measure_id": "200300154", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To design and construct permanent classrooms, science labs, restrooms, a library, a gymnasium, replace temporary classrooms, install technology, and provide core facilities at Vasquez High School and qualify for $6,100,000 in State grants, shall the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District issue $13,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint an independent Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform audits to guarantee bond money is spent exclusively upon the construction and upgrade of permanent classrooms and school buildings at Vasquez High School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1231, "no_votes": 1316, "total_votes": 2547, "percent_yes": 48.3, "percent_no": 51.7, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.943947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.735714", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To design and construct permanent classrooms, science labs, restrooms, a library, a gymnasium, replace temporary classrooms, install technology, and provide core facilities at Vasquez High School and qualify for $6,100,000 in State grants, shall the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District issue $13,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint an independent Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform audits to guarantee bond money is spent exclusively upon the construction and upgrade of permanent classrooms and school buildings at Vasquez High School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11884, "fingerprint": "2003|200300155|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300155|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a8df6d9de36bce9e", "measure_id": "200300155", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the quality of education for students in the Castaic Union School District by funding educational programs and materials, avoiding increased class sizes, maintaining and updating computers and computer instruction in the classroom, and continuing art and music programs, shall the Castaic Union School District be authorized to levy and annual tax of $48 per taxable parcel for four years only, beginning July 1, 2004, with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 907, "no_votes": 545, "total_votes": 1452, "percent_yes": 62.5, "percent_no": 37.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.889325", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.944289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.735899", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of education for students in the Castaic Union School District by funding educational programs and materials, avoiding increased class sizes, maintaining and updating computers and computer instruction in the classroom, and continuing art and music programs, shall the Castaic Union School District be authorized to levy and annual tax of $48 per taxable parcel for four years only, beginning July 1, 2004, with an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11878, "fingerprint": "2003|200300016|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300016|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0e2a621ae4c070c5", "measure_id": "200300016", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter be amended to allow the spouse of a deceased Fire and Police Retirement System (FPRS) public safety member continue to receive pension benefits if he/she remarries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5470, "no_votes": 5209, "total_votes": 10679, "percent_yes": 51.2, "percent_no": 48.8, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.885195", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.939862", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.733151", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter be amended to allow the spouse of a deceased Fire and Police Retirement System (FPRS) public safety member continue to receive pension benefits if he/she remarries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8885, "fingerprint": "2003|200300006|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300006|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cd6540876eae47c0", "measure_id": "200300006", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall office of the city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2537, "no_votes": 5409, "total_votes": 7946, "percent_yes": 31.9, "percent_no": 68.1, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-01-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.937314", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.731477", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall office of the city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11883, "fingerprint": "2003|200300116|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300116|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "515801c6e9911359", "measure_id": "200300116", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to establish a two-term limit on the number of consecutive terms (no lifetime ban) that a person may serve as a Member of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3490, "no_votes": 2996, "total_votes": 6486, "percent_yes": 53.8, "percent_no": 46.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.888921", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.943673", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.735530", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to establish a two-term limit on the number of consecutive terms (no lifetime ban) that a person may serve as a Member of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8886, "fingerprint": "2003|200300007|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300007|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200300007", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2521, "no_votes": 5356, "total_votes": 7877, "percent_yes": 32.0, "percent_no": 68.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-01-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.937581", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.731670", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8887, "fingerprint": "2003|200300008|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300008|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3d6602f2a8edcdab", "measure_id": "200300008", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of South Gate prohibit the construction of power plant facilities within the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4573, "no_votes": 3201, "total_votes": 7774, "percent_yes": 58.8, "percent_no": 41.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-01-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.937850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.731850", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of South Gate prohibit the construction of power plant facilities within the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11881, "fingerprint": "2003|200300065|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300065|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "35ca4c1dc7e21234", "measure_id": "200300065", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce the impact of budget cuts on essential educational programs, retain qualified and experienced teachers and staff and maintain manageable class sizes shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District levy a $108 annual tax on dwelling units and other parcels for five years with an exemption for the principal residence owned by persons 65 years of age or over and with an appointed citizens' oversight committee to ensure the money is spent properly?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4405, "no_votes": 3120, "total_votes": 7525, "percent_yes": 58.5, "percent_no": 41.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.887390", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.941916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.734433", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce the impact of budget cuts on essential educational programs, retain qualified and experienced teachers and staff and maintain manageable class sizes shall Manhattan Beach Unified School District levy a $108 annual tax on dwelling units and other parcels for five years with an exemption for the principal residence owned by persons 65 years of age or over and with an appointed citizens' oversight committee to ensure the money is spent properly?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11879, "fingerprint": "2003|200300017|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300017|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2bd78ef160448f7a", "measure_id": "200300017", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article XIX Section 19.5 of the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to allow for the publication of legal notices in a newspaper of general circulation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3168, "no_votes": 2149, "total_votes": 5317, "percent_yes": 59.6, "percent_no": 40.4, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.885470", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.940133", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.733330", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article XIX Section 19.5 of the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to allow for the publication of legal notices in a newspaper of general circulation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8888, "fingerprint": "2003|200300009|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300009|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6d1e4aeb6c723f85", "measure_id": "200300009", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the compensation of the elected city clerk be raised from its current rate at the level of the salary of the City Council members for attendance at City Council meetings, currently Six Hundred Dollars ($600.00) per month, to Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Six and 66/100 Dollars ($6,666.66) per month?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1273, "no_votes": 6498, "total_votes": 7771, "percent_yes": 16.400000000000002, "percent_no": 83.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-01-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.938116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.732032", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the compensation of the elected city clerk be raised from its current rate at the level of the salary of the City Council members for attendance at City Council meetings, currently Six Hundred Dollars ($600.00) per month, to Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Six and 66/100 Dollars ($6,666.66) per month?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11880, "fingerprint": "2003|200300018|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300018|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9faba431c402bfcb", "measure_id": "200300018", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article XIX of the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to allow the City Council to establish by Ordinance the minimum dollar amounts required for competitive bidding and public works contracts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1642, "no_votes": 3696, "total_votes": 5338, "percent_yes": 30.8, "percent_no": 69.2, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.885763", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.940403", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.733511", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article XIX of the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to allow the City Council to establish by Ordinance the minimum dollar amounts required for competitive bidding and public works contracts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8889, "fingerprint": "2003|200300010|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300010|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9b80d26041422134", "measure_id": "200300010", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the compensation of the elected city treasurer be raised from its current rate at the level of the salary of the City Council members for attendance at City council meetings, Six Hundred Dollars ($600.00) per month, to Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Six and 66/100 Dollars ($6,666.66) per month?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 804, "no_votes": 6873, "total_votes": 7677, "percent_yes": 10.5, "percent_no": 89.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-01-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.938386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.732214", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the compensation of the elected city treasurer be raised from its current rate at the level of the salary of the City Council members for attendance at City council meetings, Six Hundred Dollars ($600.00) per month, to Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Six and 66/100 Dollars ($6,666.66) per month?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8890, "fingerprint": "2003|200300011|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300011|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a3795deaa9940d26", "measure_id": "200300011", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Advisory Vote Only.  Shall the City of South Gate be a charter law city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2704, "no_votes": 5086, "total_votes": 7790, "percent_yes": 34.7, "percent_no": 65.3, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-01-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.938656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.732397", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Advisory Vote Only.  Shall the City of South Gate be a charter law city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8895, "fingerprint": "2003|200300053|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300053|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9f061342fa0370ea", "measure_id": "200300053", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted January 22, 2003, by the Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and known as the Hacienda Heights area, be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions, including the establishment of a provisional appropriations limit for the new city of $12,790,900, the requirement that the new city be authorized to continue to levy all previously authorized or collected rates, charges, fees, assessments and general or special taxes collected by the County of Los Angeles within the Hacienda Heights area, and that the new city shall pay a total of $18,983,278 over a period of ten (10) years to the County of Los Angeles to mitigate the negative fiscal effect of the incorporation on the County, all as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4349, "no_votes": 7268, "total_votes": 11617, "percent_yes": 37.4, "percent_no": 62.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.941228", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.734065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted January 22, 2003, by the Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and known as the Hacienda Heights area, be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions, including the establishment of a provisional appropriations limit for the new city of $12,790,900, the requirement that the new city be authorized to continue to levy all previously authorized or collected rates, charges, fees, assessments and general or special taxes collected by the County of Los Angeles within the Hacienda Heights area, and that the new city shall pay a total of $18,983,278 over a period of ten (10) years to the County of Los Angeles to mitigate the negative fiscal effect of the incorporation on the County, all as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8896, "fingerprint": "2003|200300054|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300054|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3178d3793801e9f8", "measure_id": "200300054", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If this city is incorporated, shall the members of the city council in future elections be elected by district or at large.  (Note: A yes vote indicates by district, a no vote indicates at large)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3562, "no_votes": 5164, "total_votes": 8726, "percent_yes": 40.8, "percent_no": 59.2, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.941640", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.734250", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If this city is incorporated, shall the members of the city council in future elections be elected by district or at large.  (Note: A yes vote indicates by district, a no vote indicates at large)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8891, "fingerprint": "2003|200300013|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300013|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f5f84574eaa9f047", "measure_id": "200300013", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If, and only if, the City of Burbank, California secures State funding providing 65% of the cost for a new Central Library, shall the City incur bonded indebtedness (not exceeding $14,000,000, obtained at the lowest possible interest rates) to improve literacy for children and adults by providing the remaining 35% of the Central Library cost, and by financing a renovated and expanded Northwest Branch Library -- with all expenditures subject to review by a Citizen's Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6426, "no_votes": 3035, "total_votes": 9461, "percent_yes": 67.9, "percent_no": 32.099999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-02-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.938924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.732575", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If, and only if, the City of Burbank, California secures State funding providing 65% of the cost for a new Central Library, shall the City incur bonded indebtedness (not exceeding $14,000,000, obtained at the lowest possible interest rates) to improve literacy for children and adults by providing the remaining 35% of the Central Library cost, and by financing a renovated and expanded Northwest Branch Library -- with all expenditures subject to review by a Citizen's Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11882, "fingerprint": "2003|200300115|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300115|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "acf748fbd55ee99a", "measure_id": "200300115", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 252 approving the Malibu Bay Company Development Agreement be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1696, "no_votes": 2353, "total_votes": 4049, "percent_yes": 41.9, "percent_no": 58.1, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.888707", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.943282", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.735350", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 252 approving the Malibu Bay Company Development Agreement be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8892, "fingerprint": "2003|200300014|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300014|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8a097e967bc8fbbf", "measure_id": "200300014", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Advisory Vote Only.  The City of Burbank currently allows special elections to be conducted by mail ballots.  Shall the City enact an ordinance also allowing primary nominating elections and general municipal elections to be conducted by mail ballots?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5724, "no_votes": 3263, "total_votes": 8987, "percent_yes": 63.7, "percent_no": 36.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-02-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.939306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.732757", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Advisory Vote Only.  The City of Burbank currently allows special elections to be conducted by mail ballots.  Shall the City enact an ordinance also allowing primary nominating elections and general municipal elections to be conducted by mail ballots?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8893, "fingerprint": "2003|200300048|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300048|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f8d509df47bd05bd", "measure_id": "200300048", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Burbank Municipal Code be amended to allow the City Council to increase the City's existing transient parking tax at short term parking facilities, such as at the airport, conference center, and hotels, from the current rate of 10% up to a maximum of 12% of the fee paid for parking, after a public hearing on the matter. This tax does not apply to parking at hospitals, medical facilities and monthly employee or residential parking.  The revenues from this tax shall be used for City services and facilities such as fire protection, law enforcement, parks, libraries, criminal prosecution and other authorized uses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4073, "no_votes": 4026, "total_votes": 8099, "percent_yes": 50.3, "percent_no": 49.7, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.940677", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.733692", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Burbank Municipal Code be amended to allow the City Council to increase the City's existing transient parking tax at short term parking facilities, such as at the airport, conference center, and hotels, from the current rate of 10% up to a maximum of 12% of the fee paid for parking, after a public hearing on the matter. This tax does not apply to parking at hospitals, medical facilities and monthly employee or residential parking.  The revenues from this tax shall be used for City services and facilities such as fire protection, law enforcement, parks, libraries, criminal prosecution and other authorized uses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8894, "fingerprint": "2003|200300049|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300049|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "189f8a9a4fa06993", "measure_id": "200300049", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed Charter Amendment which would amend Sections 26 and 30 of the Charter of the City of Burbank to provide that vacancies in the office of Council Member, City Clerk and City Treasurer shall be filled by a special election called for that purpose, unless less than 16 months remain in the unexpired term, in which case the vacancy shall be filled by appointment by the Council, and to provide that if a majority of Council seats become vacant, the City Clerk shall immediately call a special election to fill the vacancies and to provide that the exercise of the powers of initiative, referendum and recall shall be governed by the Elections code of the State of California, be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5318, "no_votes": 2123, "total_votes": 7441, "percent_yes": 71.5, "percent_no": 28.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-04-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.940954", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.733874", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed Charter Amendment which would amend Sections 26 and 30 of the Charter of the City of Burbank to provide that vacancies in the office of Council Member, City Clerk and City Treasurer shall be filled by a special election called for that purpose, unless less than 16 months remain in the unexpired term, in which case the vacancy shall be filled by appointment by the Council, and to provide that if a majority of Council seats become vacant, the City Clerk shall immediately call a special election to fill the vacancies and to provide that the exercise of the powers of initiative, referendum and recall shall be governed by the Elections code of the State of California, be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8897, "fingerprint": "2003|200300066|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300066|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "099e40753f8ba51f", "measure_id": "200300066", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the high quality of local schools, reduce the impact of budget cuts on classroom instruction by retaining qualified experienced teachers and staff, keeping class sizes small, purchasing new textbooks, and maintaining educational programs that enhance student achievement shall the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual tax not to exceed $173 per parcel for 5 years with and exemption for the principal residence owned by a person 65 years of age or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8578, "no_votes": 3143, "total_votes": 11721, "percent_yes": 73.2, "percent_no": 26.799999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.942201", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.734614", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the high quality of local schools, reduce the impact of budget cuts on classroom instruction by retaining qualified experienced teachers and staff, keeping class sizes small, purchasing new textbooks, and maintaining educational programs that enhance student achievement shall the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual tax not to exceed $173 per parcel for 5 years with and exemption for the principal residence owned by a person 65 years of age or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8898, "fingerprint": "2003|200300067|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300067|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c4688b5500f1d500", "measure_id": "200300067", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve the quality of local schools despite unprecedented state cuts in public education, shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District levy a qualified special tax of $225 per parcel each year for 6 years exempting property owned and occupied by persons age 65 and older?  Mandatory resident taxpayer oversight and independent annual audits will ensure that these revenues are used to preserve the core curriculum in all grades and prevent deterioration in quality caused by reduced state funding.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12157, "no_votes": 5821, "total_votes": 17978, "percent_yes": 67.60000000000001, "percent_no": 32.39999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.942473", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.734796", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the quality of local schools despite unprecedented state cuts in public education, shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District levy a qualified special tax of $225 per parcel each year for 6 years exempting property owned and occupied by persons age 65 and older?  Mandatory resident taxpayer oversight and independent annual audits will ensure that these revenues are used to preserve the core curriculum in all grades and prevent deterioration in quality caused by reduced state funding.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8899, "fingerprint": "2003|200300113|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300113|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4c3908445466321c", "measure_id": "200300113", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the City's Civil Service System to allow military veterans a three-percentage point credit in the scoring of competitive employment examinations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1562, "no_votes": 1359, "total_votes": 2921, "percent_yes": 53.5, "percent_no": 46.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.942748", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.734976", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the City's Civil Service System to allow military veterans a three-percentage point credit in the scoring of competitive employment examinations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8900, "fingerprint": "2003|200300114|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300114|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4453d47b2919b4e9", "measure_id": "200300114", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Advisory Vote Only.  Should the City Council consider constructing a separate bike path on the beach?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1127, "no_votes": 1997, "total_votes": 3124, "percent_yes": 36.1, "percent_no": 63.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.943015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.735164", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Advisory Vote Only.  Should the City Council consider constructing a separate bike path on the beach?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8902, "fingerprint": "2003|200300091|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300091|MADERA", "content_hash": "fea4ef82bd708a23", "measure_id": "200300091", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the purpose of financing the improvement of real property and construction of facilities for authorized high school, shall the Chawanakee Unified School District incur a bonded indebtedness in the amount of $8,800,000 with an  interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 625, "no_votes": 1265, "total_votes": 1890, "percent_yes": 33.1, "percent_no": 66.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-09-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.944850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.736263", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the purpose of financing the improvement of real property and construction of facilities for authorized high school, shall the Chawanakee Unified School District incur a bonded indebtedness in the amount of $8,800,000 with an  interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11888, "fingerprint": "2003|200300157|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300157|MARIN", "content_hash": "523b9e474856eaae", "measure_id": "200300157", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Bolinas-Stinson Union School District continue to provide excellent educational programs and small class sizes to the children of our community by replacing the current tax with a $198 annual tax per assessor's parcel for 5 years beginning July 1, 2004?  This will restore the tax to July '99- June '03 level and will include an exemption for beneficial parcel owners 65 or older of any applicable year who use that parcel as their principal residence.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 671, "no_votes": 171, "total_votes": 842, "percent_yes": 79.7, "percent_no": 20.299999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.891365", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.946873", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.737534", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Bolinas-Stinson Union School District continue to provide excellent educational programs and small class sizes to the children of our community by replacing the current tax with a $198 annual tax per assessor's parcel for 5 years beginning July 1, 2004?  This will restore the tax to July '99- June '03 level and will include an exemption for beneficial parcel owners 65 or older of any applicable year who use that parcel as their principal residence.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11886, "fingerprint": "2003|200300068|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300068|MARIN", "content_hash": "435e3f374bd38f13", "measure_id": "200300068", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Bolinas-Stinson Union School District repeal existing current special tax assessments totaling $198.00 annually, and replace them with a new special tax assessment of $248.00 annually per assessor's parcel with a 5% increase each year thereafter, for a period of 6 years, beginning July 1, 2003, with an exemption for parcel owners who are 65 or older on or before July 1 of any applicable year and who use that parcel as their principal residence?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 411, "no_votes": 243, "total_votes": 654, "percent_yes": 62.8, "percent_no": 37.2, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.890343", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.945727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.736816", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Bolinas-Stinson Union School District repeal existing current special tax assessments totaling $198.00 annually, and replace them with a new special tax assessment of $248.00 annually per assessor's parcel with a 5% increase each year thereafter, for a period of 6 years, beginning July 1, 2003, with an exemption for parcel owners who are 65 or older on or before July 1 of any applicable year and who use that parcel as their principal residence?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8903, "fingerprint": "2003|200300042|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300042|MARIN", "content_hash": "ad1dd9d9cd2b8a25", "measure_id": "200300042", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellence in Mill Valley's public education by maintaining, restoring and enhancing specific educational programs, shall the Mill Valley School District (Edna Maguire, Middle, Old Mill, Park, Strawberry  Point and Tamalpais Valley schools) levy a supplemental special tax, at the rate of $181, beginning July 1, 2003 and increasing by 5% thereafter, with an exemption for property owners age 65, implement accountability measures, and increase the District's appropriations limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4362, "no_votes": 2897, "total_votes": 7259, "percent_yes": 60.1, "percent_no": 39.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.945186", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.736450", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellence in Mill Valley's public education by maintaining, restoring and enhancing specific educational programs, shall the Mill Valley School District (Edna Maguire, Middle, Old Mill, Park, Strawberry  Point and Tamalpais Valley schools) levy a supplemental special tax, at the rate of $181, beginning July 1, 2003 and increasing by 5% thereafter, with an exemption for property owners age 65, implement accountability measures, and increase the District's appropriations limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11889, "fingerprint": "2003|200300158|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300158|MARIN", "content_hash": "a04ea8566f271ca7", "measure_id": "200300158", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve the quality of education for all students in the Dixie Elementary School District, emphasizing improved reading, writing, and math skills; attracting and retaining qualified, experienced teachers; and maintaining instructional materials and equipment for science programs; shall the Dixie Elementary School District levy a total assessment of $245 per developed or undeveloped parcel, beginning 7/1/04 (each year for 8 years) with subsequent 3% annual cost of living adjustments, beginning 7/1/05?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3781, "no_votes": 1960, "total_votes": 5741, "percent_yes": 65.9, "percent_no": 34.099999999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.891622", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.947141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.737718", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve the quality of education for all students in the Dixie Elementary School District, emphasizing improved reading, writing, and math skills; attracting and retaining qualified, experienced teachers; and maintaining instructional materials and equipment for science programs; shall the Dixie Elementary School District levy a total assessment of $245 per developed or undeveloped parcel, beginning 7/1/04 (each year for 8 years) with subsequent 3% annual cost of living adjustments, beginning 7/1/05?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11887, "fingerprint": "2003|200300069|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300069|MARIN", "content_hash": "a9b3cae948463699", "measure_id": "200300069", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To partially offset the impact of the Governor's proposed reductions in State funding, facilitate student learning in core academic subjects, and continue to provide a quality education for the entire student population, shall the Larkspur School District supplement its existing assessment, on a temporary basis, at the rate of $75.00 per year, for a period of two years, beginning on July 1, 2003, with specific exemptions for property owners age 65 or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2351, "no_votes": 779, "total_votes": 3130, "percent_yes": 75.1, "percent_no": 24.900000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.890542", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.946064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.736995", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To partially offset the impact of the Governor's proposed reductions in State funding, facilitate student learning in core academic subjects, and continue to provide a quality education for the entire student population, shall the Larkspur School District supplement its existing assessment, on a temporary basis, at the rate of $75.00 per year, for a period of two years, beginning on July 1, 2003, with specific exemptions for property owners age 65 or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8904, "fingerprint": "2003|200300043|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300043|MARIN", "content_hash": "4b513fe071751b28", "measure_id": "200300043", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain and enhance the quality of public education in Tiburon, Belvedere and East Corte Madera by providing continued support for small classes, exceptional instructional programs, essential curriculum development and professional training, shall the Reed Union School District be authorized to renew a special assessment commencing July 1, 2003 for a maximum of five years at the rate of $275 per parcel per year with a 3% yearly adjustment and an exemption for property owners age 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2637, "no_votes": 854, "total_votes": 3491, "percent_yes": 75.5, "percent_no": 24.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.945455", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.736632", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain and enhance the quality of public education in Tiburon, Belvedere and East Corte Madera by providing continued support for small classes, exceptional instructional programs, essential curriculum development and professional training, shall the Reed Union School District be authorized to renew a special assessment commencing July 1, 2003 for a maximum of five years at the rate of $275 per parcel per year with a 3% yearly adjustment and an exemption for property owners age 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8906, "fingerprint": "2003|200300117|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300117|MARIN", "content_hash": "5f724f4af52d0635", "measure_id": "200300117", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the motion of the San Anselmo Town Council awarding a five-year franchise agreement to Marin Sanitary Service for Solid Waste, Recycling, and Green Waste Services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2494, "no_votes": 536, "total_votes": 3030, "percent_yes": 82.3, "percent_no": 17.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.946606", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.737354", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the motion of the San Anselmo Town Council awarding a five-year franchise agreement to Marin Sanitary Service for Solid Waste, Recycling, and Green Waste Services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8905, "fingerprint": "2003|200300093|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300093|MARIN", "content_hash": "899fb53ce3dc0d8c", "measure_id": "200300093", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Marinwood CSD Special Tax for Fire Protection and Prevention be increased from a maximum of 12 to a maximum of 18 cents per square foot of living or working area and, for unimproved acreage, increased from forty dollars to sixty dollars per acre; and shall the appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 928, "no_votes": 338, "total_votes": 1266, "percent_yes": 73.3, "percent_no": 26.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.946339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.737175", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Marinwood CSD Special Tax for Fire Protection and Prevention be increased from a maximum of 12 to a maximum of 18 cents per square foot of living or working area and, for unimproved acreage, increased from forty dollars to sixty dollars per acre; and shall the appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8907, "fingerprint": "2003|200300055|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300055|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "58c37167d4867a4a", "measure_id": "200300055", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a transactions (sales) and use tax at a maximum rate of one-half (1/2) of one percent to be used exclusively for the maintenance, repair, replacement, construction and reconstruction of the City's road system?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 364, "no_votes": 121, "total_votes": 485, "percent_yes": 75.1, "percent_no": 24.900000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.947416", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.737899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a transactions (sales) and use tax at a maximum rate of one-half (1/2) of one percent to be used exclusively for the maintenance, repair, replacement, construction and reconstruction of the City's road system?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8909, "fingerprint": "2003|200300118|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300118|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "4c7ad22dd9123d2f", "measure_id": "200300118", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance Number 184 enacting a transactions and use tax in the amount of one half of one percent of gross receipts for the maintenance, repair, replacement, construction, and reconstruction of the city's road system be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 67, "no_votes": 30, "total_votes": 97, "percent_yes": 69.1, "percent_no": 30.900000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.948049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.738263", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance Number 184 enacting a transactions and use tax in the amount of one half of one percent of gross receipts for the maintenance, repair, replacement, construction, and reconstruction of the city's road system be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11890, "fingerprint": "2003|200300160|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300160|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "89d5eff1dd9a08e9", "measure_id": "200300160", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable Fort Bragg Unified School District to renovate and modernize neighborhood schools and Cotton Auditorium; repair dryrot; complete legally required safety and access improvements; repair roofs; replace obsolete  plumbing and boilers; upgrade classroom wiring for computers and modern technology; and fund the local requirement to make the District eligible to receive $6,200,000 in State matching grants, shall the District issue $22,200,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with annual audits, citizen's oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1946, "no_votes": 1012, "total_votes": 2958, "percent_yes": 65.8, "percent_no": 34.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.892665", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.948589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.738627", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable Fort Bragg Unified School District to renovate and modernize neighborhood schools and Cotton Auditorium; repair dryrot; complete legally required safety and access improvements; repair roofs; replace obsolete  plumbing and boilers; upgrade classroom wiring for computers and modern technology; and fund the local requirement to make the District eligible to receive $6,200,000 in State matching grants, shall the District issue $22,200,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with annual audits, citizen's oversight and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8908, "fingerprint": "2003|200300070|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300070|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "d4e5e6580318ba12", "measure_id": "200300070", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of reduction of class size and maintenance and enhancement of academic and educational programs by levying a special tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of seven years, beginning July 1, 2003 and increase its appropriation limit by  the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1626, "no_votes": 992, "total_votes": 2618, "percent_yes": 62.1, "percent_no": 37.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.947720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.738082", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of reduction of class size and maintenance and enhancement of academic and educational programs by levying a special tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of seven years, beginning July 1, 2003 and increase its appropriation limit by  the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8910, "fingerprint": "2003|200300159|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300159|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "fbb67f41d7b66fd8", "measure_id": "200300159", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide all students, including charter school students, with healthy, safe modern and educationally appropriate facilities, shall the Arena Union Elementary School District issue $3,700,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to finance a districtwide elementary school facility in Gualala, convert the existing Arena School into a Middle School, and qualify for State Construction Grants, subject to annual independent audits and a citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures, with no funds spent on District Administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 554, "no_votes": 198, "total_votes": 752, "percent_yes": 73.7, "percent_no": 26.299999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.948320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.738442", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide all students, including charter school students, with healthy, safe modern and educationally appropriate facilities, shall the Arena Union Elementary School District issue $3,700,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to finance a districtwide elementary school facility in Gualala, convert the existing Arena School into a Middle School, and qualify for State Construction Grants, subject to annual independent audits and a citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures, with no funds spent on District Administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8914, "fingerprint": "2003|200300163|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300163|MERCED", "content_hash": "bceba950d6f22a8a", "measure_id": "200300163", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Turlock Joint Union High School District and the Turlock Joint Elementary School District be reorganized into a new unified school district, the Turlock Joint Unified School District? If approved, the Turlock Joint Unified School District would be governed by a seven (7) member Board of Trustees elected at large.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29, "no_votes": 32, "total_votes": 61, "percent_yes": 47.5, "percent_no": 52.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.950180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.739362", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Turlock Joint Union High School District and the Turlock Joint Elementary School District be reorganized into a new unified school district, the Turlock Joint Unified School District? If approved, the Turlock Joint Unified School District would be governed by a seven (7) member Board of Trustees elected at large.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8911, "fingerprint": "2003|200300050|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300050|MERCED", "content_hash": "0067bcd85f98dc0d", "measure_id": "200300050", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade old fire alarm, electrical, and emergency communication systems; replace worn-out bathrooms plumbing; renovate and construct libraries, classrooms, school buildings, support facilities, and multipurpose rooms where children can have lunch or P.E. in bad weather; and acquire land for and build new schools, but not for salaries or other operating expenses, shall the Merced City Elementary School District issue and sell up to $42,000,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4379, "no_votes": 2545, "total_votes": 6924, "percent_yes": 63.2, "percent_no": 36.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-05-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.949189", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.738815", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade old fire alarm, electrical, and emergency communication systems; replace worn-out bathrooms plumbing; renovate and construct libraries, classrooms, school buildings, support facilities, and multipurpose rooms where children can have lunch or P.E. in bad weather; and acquire land for and build new schools, but not for salaries or other operating expenses, shall the Merced City Elementary School District issue and sell up to $42,000,000 of bonds at not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8912, "fingerprint": "2003|200300161|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300161|MERCED", "content_hash": "c1536322a485510b", "measure_id": "200300161", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct/renovate schools, reduce overcrowding and improve education, shall the Los Banos Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 1 be authorized to levy taxes on developed residential property of $60/year for 30 years and a developers' tax of $8,500 at building permit and $8,500 at certificate of occupancy, each adjusted for inflation annually, as provided in Resolution 17-03, issue up to $103,000,000 of bonds, and establish an annual appropriation limit in the amount of taxes collected, to be monitored by a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1965, "no_votes": 1664, "total_votes": 3629, "percent_yes": 54.1, "percent_no": 45.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.949568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.738999", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct/renovate schools, reduce overcrowding and improve education, shall the Los Banos Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 1 be authorized to levy taxes on developed residential property of $60/year for 30 years and a developers' tax of $8,500 at building permit and $8,500 at certificate of occupancy, each adjusted for inflation annually, as provided in Resolution 17-03, issue up to $103,000,000 of bonds, and establish an annual appropriation limit in the amount of taxes collected, to be monitored by a Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8913, "fingerprint": "2003|200300162|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300162|MERCED", "content_hash": "0d747f6137aea3a5", "measure_id": "200300162", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood elementary schools including replacing worn-out bathrooms, electrical and emergency systems, renovate and construct libraries, classrooms, buildings, support facilities, multipurpose rooms where children can have lunch, P.E. or classes during bad weather, acquire land for and build new schools, but not for salaries or operating expenses; with citizens oversight, shall the Merced City Elementary School District issue and sell up to $26,500,000 of bonds not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4710, "no_votes": 3311, "total_votes": 8021, "percent_yes": 58.7, "percent_no": 41.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.949886", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.739179", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood elementary schools including replacing worn-out bathrooms, electrical and emergency systems, renovate and construct libraries, classrooms, buildings, support facilities, multipurpose rooms where children can have lunch, P.E. or classes during bad weather, acquire land for and build new schools, but not for salaries or operating expenses; with citizens oversight, shall the Merced City Elementary School District issue and sell up to $26,500,000 of bonds not to exceed the maximum legal interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8915, "fingerprint": "2003|200300071|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300071|MONO", "content_hash": "abba33481c492c8b", "measure_id": "200300071", "measure_letter": "03-A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure reliable funding for our schools in order to maintain current classroom programs, provide books and classroom materials for students, update computers and maintain technology support, maintain smaller class sizes and retain high quality teachers, shall the Mammoth Unified School District be authorized to implement a limited four year instructional parcel tax of $59.00 per taxable parcel to be overseen by a citizen's oversight committee and with an exemption for primary residents age sixty-five and older.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1183, "no_votes": 394, "total_votes": 1577, "percent_yes": 75.0, "percent_no": 25.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.950456", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.739542", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure reliable funding for our schools in order to maintain current classroom programs, provide books and classroom materials for students, update computers and maintain technology support, maintain smaller class sizes and retain high quality teachers, shall the Mammoth Unified School District be authorized to implement a limited four year instructional parcel tax of $59.00 per taxable parcel to be overseen by a citizen's oversight committee and with an exemption for primary residents age sixty-five and older.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8919, "fingerprint": "2003|200300164|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300164|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f2850710377e1715", "measure_id": "200300164", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To preserve the educational quality of our schools in the face of Statewide budget cuts, to maintain small class sizes, to enhance campus maintenance and student safety, and to improve programs including but not limited to science, music, libraries, and athletics, shall Pacific Grove Unified School District levy a tax of $35 per parcel for 5 years so long as no money is used for administrative salaries, and a citizens oversight committee is established?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3853, "no_votes": 1455, "total_votes": 5308, "percent_yes": 72.6, "percent_no": 27.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.951736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.740265", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To preserve the educational quality of our schools in the face of Statewide budget cuts, to maintain small class sizes, to enhance campus maintenance and student safety, and to improve programs including but not limited to science, music, libraries, and athletics, shall Pacific Grove Unified School District levy a tax of $35 per parcel for 5 years so long as no money is used for administrative salaries, and a citizens oversight committee is established?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8916, "fingerprint": "2003|200300119|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300119|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "9528e495efc8ac1b", "measure_id": "200300119", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 256 providing for adoption of a special Public Safety Tax for no more than five fiscal years to fund police and fire protection services within the City, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 385, "no_votes": 218, "total_votes": 603, "percent_yes": 63.8, "percent_no": 36.2, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.950796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.739728", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 256 providing for adoption of a special Public Safety Tax for no more than five fiscal years to fund police and fire protection services within the City, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8917, "fingerprint": "2003|200300120|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300120|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "cda7222ce65188eb", "measure_id": "200300120", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city councilmembers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 764, "no_votes": 109, "total_votes": 873, "percent_yes": 87.5, "percent_no": 12.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.951101", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.739907", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city councilmembers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8918, "fingerprint": "2003|200300121|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300121|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "f8192aea2157400a", "measure_id": "200300121", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?[Yes votes]  Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?[No votes]", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 534, "no_votes": 332, "total_votes": 866, "percent_yes": 61.7, "percent_no": 38.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.951381", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.740087", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?[Yes votes]  Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?[No votes]", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8920, "fingerprint": "2003|200300019|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300019|NAPA", "content_hash": "24c82374e86700ae", "measure_id": "200300019", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 185 be added to the City Charter to limit the use of Alston Park through December 31, 2017 to passive recreation and open space purposes subject to exceptions consistent with the park's passive recreation and open space purposes and uses as of March 2003?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8117, "no_votes": 3017, "total_votes": 11134, "percent_yes": 72.89999999999999, "percent_no": 27.10000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.952007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.740445", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 185 be added to the City Charter to limit the use of Alston Park through December 31, 2017 to passive recreation and open space purposes subject to exceptions consistent with the park's passive recreation and open space purposes and uses as of March 2003?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11891, "fingerprint": "2003|200300022|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300022|NAPA", "content_hash": "4b84efcde9edb027", "measure_id": "200300022", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "ADVISORY VOTE ONLY. This proposition does not increase taxes. If Proposition C is approved and the Town's Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) is increased from 10% to 12%, should the additional revenue be used for the Town's Community Center Project?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 813, "no_votes": 389, "total_votes": 1202, "percent_yes": 67.60000000000001, "percent_no": 32.39999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.895494", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.952906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.740992", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ADVISORY VOTE ONLY. This proposition does not increase taxes. If Proposition C is approved and the Town's Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) is increased from 10% to 12%, should the additional revenue be used for the Town's Community Center Project?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8921, "fingerprint": "2003|200300020|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300020|NAPA", "content_hash": "6cb2f753a66e46d4", "measure_id": "200300020", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 10 of the City Charter be amended to change the residency requirement for qualifications of elective officers from one year immediately preceding the date of such election to 30 days prior to filing of nomination papers to conform to case law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4195, "no_votes": 6643, "total_votes": 10838, "percent_yes": 38.7, "percent_no": 61.3, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.952308", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.740629", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 10 of the City Charter be amended to change the residency requirement for qualifications of elective officers from one year immediately preceding the date of such election to 30 days prior to filing of nomination papers to conform to case law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11892, "fingerprint": "2003|200300023|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300023|NAPA", "content_hash": "45c67722fde5584b", "measure_id": "200300023", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the Town's Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) from 10% to 12%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 833, "no_votes": 390, "total_votes": 1223, "percent_yes": 68.10000000000001, "percent_no": 31.89999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.895695", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.953182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.741173", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase the Town's Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) from 10% to 12%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8922, "fingerprint": "2003|200300021|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300021|NAPA", "content_hash": "fc6528c70ed76917", "measure_id": "200300021", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Napa City Charter Section 76.1(F)1 be amended to increase the number of eligible persons on the certified list for Police Officer Trainee and Police Officer Entry from six names to a number to be decided by the City Manager and Chief of Police?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8639, "no_votes": 2255, "total_votes": 10894, "percent_yes": 79.3, "percent_no": 20.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.952577", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.740809", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Napa City Charter Section 76.1(F)1 be amended to increase the number of eligible persons on the certified list for Police Officer Trainee and Police Officer Entry from six names to a number to be decided by the City Manager and Chief of Police?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8923, "fingerprint": "2003|200300024|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300024|NAPA", "content_hash": "43691e9ac85f1f1a", "measure_id": "200300024", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit set pursuant to Article 13B of the California Constitution be raised by the sum of $900,000 so that the Town of Yountville can expend up to $900,000 additional funds each year for a four year period commencing with the fiscal year 2003/04? The additional funds to be expended are funds collected through taxes presently in effect and no present tax rates are to be increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 922, "no_votes": 271, "total_votes": 1193, "percent_yes": 77.3, "percent_no": 22.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.953446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.741353", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit set pursuant to Article 13B of the California Constitution be raised by the sum of $900,000 so that the Town of Yountville can expend up to $900,000 additional funds each year for a four year period commencing with the fiscal year 2003/04? The additional funds to be expended are funds collected through taxes presently in effect and no present tax rates are to be increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8924, "fingerprint": "2003|200300012|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300012|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b964a4e40b47cca7", "measure_id": "200300012", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Nativo Lopez be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member; Santa Ana Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9268, "no_votes": 4113, "total_votes": 13381, "percent_yes": 69.3, "percent_no": 30.700000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-02-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.953714", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.741533", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Nativo Lopez be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member; Santa Ana Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11893, "fingerprint": "2003|200300056|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300056|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2f34f089dc6747d8", "measure_id": "200300056", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Initiative Ordinance No. 2003-01, and Initiative to Support the CenterLine Light Rail Project -- with an alignment from UC Irvine through the Irvine Business Complex to John Wayne Airport and destinations outside Irvine -- and providing any future extensions or different alignment require voter approval, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8555, "no_votes": 9423, "total_votes": 17978, "percent_yes": 47.6, "percent_no": 52.4, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.896574", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.954289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.741904", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Initiative Ordinance No. 2003-01, and Initiative to Support the CenterLine Light Rail Project -- with an alignment from UC Irvine through the Irvine Business Complex to John Wayne Airport and destinations outside Irvine -- and providing any future extensions or different alignment require voter approval, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8925, "fingerprint": "2003|200300052|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300052|ORANGE", "content_hash": "77814a33570ee217", "measure_id": "200300052", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted extending and increasing the special tax on the parcels of property in Three Arch Bay District on the basis of $200.00 per fiscal year per parcel containing residential or commercial improvements and $130.00 per fiscal year per parcel of vacant land, for the purpose of providing Law Enforcement Services.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 343, "no_votes": 72, "total_votes": 415, "percent_yes": 82.69999999999999, "percent_no": 17.30000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.954019", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.741719", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted extending and increasing the special tax on the parcels of property in Three Arch Bay District on the basis of $200.00 per fiscal year per parcel containing residential or commercial improvements and $130.00 per fiscal year per parcel of vacant land, for the purpose of providing Law Enforcement Services.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8926, "fingerprint": "2003|200300057|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300057|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6876a7a00433adbf", "measure_id": "200300057", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Initiative Ordinance No. 2003-02, and Initiative to Prohibit any City of Irvine Participation in the CenterLine Light Rail Project be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8419, "no_votes": 9161, "total_votes": 17580, "percent_yes": 47.9, "percent_no": 52.1, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.954557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.742087", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Initiative Ordinance No. 2003-02, and Initiative to Prohibit any City of Irvine Participation in the CenterLine Light Rail Project be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8927, "fingerprint": "2003|200300051|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300051|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "9994534fcb1401f0", "measure_id": "200300051", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Robert Meacher be recalled (removed) from the office of Supervisor District 2?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 587, "no_votes": 1057, "total_votes": 1644, "percent_yes": 35.7, "percent_no": 64.3, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-05-20", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.954838", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.742271", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Robert Meacher be recalled (removed) from the office of Supervisor District 2?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8928, "fingerprint": "2003|200300094|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300094|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "8db3e5a627d3b572", "measure_id": "200300094", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Upon adoption by the majority of registered voters in the Greenhorn Creek Community Services District, shall the Board of Directors of the District (currently the County Board of Supervisors) be changed to a Board of Directors elected by registered voters of the District, with the election of directors to be held at the next general district election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43, "no_votes": 7, "total_votes": 50, "percent_yes": 86.0, "percent_no": 14.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.955168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.742450", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Upon adoption by the majority of registered voters in the Greenhorn Creek Community Services District, shall the Board of Directors of the District (currently the County Board of Supervisors) be changed to a Board of Directors elected by registered voters of the District, with the election of directors to be held at the next general district election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 8930, "fingerprint": "2003|200300044|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300044|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "0c0e222acdc84220", "measure_id": "200300044", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and build new classrooms and facilities within the Nuview Union School District, replace plumbing, air conditioning, communications and electrical systems,  provide classroom technology, create handicapped access, make the District eligible for State matching funds and enhanced safety with fire  hydrants, security fencing, safer playgrounds, and asbestos removal, shall the District issue $6,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below the legal limit with spending reviewed by a citizen's oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 375, "no_votes": 299, "total_votes": 674, "percent_yes": 55.60000000000001, "percent_no": 44.39999999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.955832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.742824", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and build new classrooms and facilities within the Nuview Union School District, replace plumbing, air conditioning, communications and electrical systems,  provide classroom technology, create handicapped access, make the District eligible for State matching funds and enhanced safety with fire  hydrants, security fencing, safer playgrounds, and asbestos removal, shall the District issue $6,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below the legal limit with spending reviewed by a citizen's oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8929, "fingerprint": "2003|200300025|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300025|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "018fb9d89f6323cc", "measure_id": "200300025", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 819 be adopted to authorize continued collection of the City's existing transient occupancy tax (\"hotel bed tax\") at the rate of 10% established by Ordinance No. 530 of the City in May 1992 and to amend its provisions to restrict the use of one percent (1%) of the proceeds of the tax to provide funds for the promotion of the tourism and convention industry?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2105, "no_votes": 156, "total_votes": 2261, "percent_yes": 93.1, "percent_no": 6.900000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.955440", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.742636", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 819 be adopted to authorize continued collection of the City's existing transient occupancy tax (\"hotel bed tax\") at the rate of 10% established by Ordinance No. 530 of the City in May 1992 and to amend its provisions to restrict the use of one percent (1%) of the proceeds of the tax to provide funds for the promotion of the tourism and convention industry?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8931, "fingerprint": "2003|200300058|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300058|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ec3e4daf13b01ccc", "measure_id": "200300058", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should a Utility Users Tax Ordinance becoming effective on July 1, 2005, and expiring on June 30, 2010, levying and collecting a tax at the rate of 5% of utility service charges be approved with fifty percent dedicated to resolving the City's bankruptcy and restructuring the City's debt and fifty percent dedicated to providing needed public safety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 777, "no_votes": 372, "total_votes": 1149, "percent_yes": 67.60000000000001, "percent_no": 32.39999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.956180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.743006", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should a Utility Users Tax Ordinance becoming effective on July 1, 2005, and expiring on June 30, 2010, levying and collecting a tax at the rate of 5% of utility service charges be approved with fifty percent dedicated to resolving the City's bankruptcy and restructuring the City's debt and fifty percent dedicated to providing needed public safety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8932, "fingerprint": "2003|200300085|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300085|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "a17de62533885152", "measure_id": "200300085", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Firefighter Paramedic Services. Shall the county of Riverside be authorized to establish a Special Tax of $54.99 per parcel, per year on all parcels within CSA 152 \"D\" to finance the service of two firefighter paramedics?  The Special Tax will be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Consumers (\"CPI-U\") for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area (\"Index\") published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2112, "no_votes": 2015, "total_votes": 4127, "percent_yes": 51.2, "percent_no": 48.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-07-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.956478", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.743188", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Firefighter Paramedic Services. Shall the county of Riverside be authorized to establish a Special Tax of $54.99 per parcel, per year on all parcels within CSA 152 \"D\" to finance the service of two firefighter paramedics?  The Special Tax will be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Consumers (\"CPI-U\") for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area (\"Index\") published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8933, "fingerprint": "2003|200300086|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300086|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "53d6bdf69f30625e", "measure_id": "200300086", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Sheriff Services. Shall the county of Riverside be authorized to establish a Special Tax of $41.31 per parcel, per year on all parcels within CSA 152 \"D\" to finance the service of two sheriff deputies?  The Special Tax will be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Consumers (\"CPI-U\") for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area (\"Index\") published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2043, "no_votes": 2067, "total_votes": 4110, "percent_yes": 49.7, "percent_no": 50.3, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-07-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.956826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.743375", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Sheriff Services. Shall the county of Riverside be authorized to establish a Special Tax of $41.31 per parcel, per year on all parcels within CSA 152 \"D\" to finance the service of two sheriff deputies?  The Special Tax will be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Consumers (\"CPI-U\") for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area (\"Index\") published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8937, "fingerprint": "2003|200300125|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300125|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cdab98367c98a38d", "measure_id": "200300125", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To replace outdated and substandard fire stations to improve emergency services and response times, upgrade training facilities and construct an emergency operations center to manage major disasters, shall the City of Riverside incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $20,000,000, with interest at the statutory rate, to be repaid from ad valorem taxes levied annually at a rate which shall not exceed $12 per $100,000 of the full cash value of property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15060, "no_votes": 6189, "total_votes": 21249, "percent_yes": 70.89999999999999, "percent_no": 29.10000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.957961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.744140", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace outdated and substandard fire stations to improve emergency services and response times, upgrade training facilities and construct an emergency operations center to manage major disasters, shall the City of Riverside incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $20,000,000, with interest at the statutory rate, to be repaid from ad valorem taxes levied annually at a rate which shall not exceed $12 per $100,000 of the full cash value of property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8934, "fingerprint": "2003|200300122|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300122|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "012efb835eec4ed5", "measure_id": "200300122", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to Amend the Historic Murrieta Specific Plan and Land Use Designation map at the corner of Juniper and Adams from Village Single Family-2 to Village Public/Civic/Institutional and the area bounded by Kalmia, New Clay, B Street and Second from Village Single Family-1 to Village Public/Civic/Institutional and Invalidate specific Development Agreements and require that the City immediately acquire Murrieta Town Hall, 41810 Juniper, and contiguous property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4579, "no_votes": 2870, "total_votes": 7449, "percent_yes": 61.5, "percent_no": 38.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:34", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.957098", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.743557", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be adopted to Amend the Historic Murrieta Specific Plan and Land Use Designation map at the corner of Juniper and Adams from Village Single Family-2 to Village Public/Civic/Institutional and the area bounded by Kalmia, New Clay, B Street and Second from Village Single Family-1 to Village Public/Civic/Institutional and Invalidate specific Development Agreements and require that the City immediately acquire Murrieta Town Hall, 41810 Juniper, and contiguous property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8936, "fingerprint": "2003|200300124|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300124|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "028c118adf17f7d5", "measure_id": "200300124", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Palm Springs Municipal code be amended concerning the tax currently collected on persons staying at group meeting hotels, generally defined as hotels with more than 125 rooms and which accommodate large groups, by increasing the tax rate by one percentage point (1%), be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7908, "no_votes": 2716, "total_votes": 10624, "percent_yes": 74.4, "percent_no": 25.599999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.957688", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.743962", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Palm Springs Municipal code be amended concerning the tax currently collected on persons staying at group meeting hotels, generally defined as hotels with more than 125 rooms and which accommodate large groups, by increasing the tax rate by one percentage point (1%), be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8935, "fingerprint": "2003|200300123|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300123|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "961955384a82207d", "measure_id": "200300123", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Norco become a Charter City subject to the provisions of that charter prepared by the Charter Ad Hoc Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1923, "no_votes": 1395, "total_votes": 3318, "percent_yes": 57.99999999999999, "percent_no": 42.00000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.957419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.743773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Norco become a Charter City subject to the provisions of that charter prepared by the Charter Ad Hoc Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8938, "fingerprint": "2003|200300045|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300045|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6aa6020ab358244b", "measure_id": "200300045", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Central School District of San Bernardino County issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $25,000,000 for the purpose of constructing permanent improvements to real property of the District including but not limited to: acquiring and replacing portable classrooms; acquiring and improving land including parking lot, student drop-off, and playground areas; constructing additional school facilities; constructing and/or remodeling various instructional and support facilities and modernizing various school facilities, all as needed throughout the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 837, "no_votes": 738, "total_votes": 1575, "percent_yes": 53.1, "percent_no": 46.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.958229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.744320", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Central School District of San Bernardino County issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $25,000,000 for the purpose of constructing permanent improvements to real property of the District including but not limited to: acquiring and replacing portable classrooms; acquiring and improving land including parking lot, student drop-off, and playground areas; constructing additional school facilities; constructing and/or remodeling various instructional and support facilities and modernizing various school facilities, all as needed throughout the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8939, "fingerprint": "2003|200300059|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300059|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3d6013c76d5957a1", "measure_id": "200300059", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Advisory Vote Only.  Should the City give priority to funding the following services and programs: Strengthening public safety and emergency preparedness by filling all vacant police and fire positions and adding additional police and fire personnel; improving streets, access to City facilities for senior citizens and people with disabilities; after school programs and other vital city services; and maintaining adequate reserves to address catastrophic events?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2108, "no_votes": 1193, "total_votes": 3301, "percent_yes": 63.9, "percent_no": 36.1, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.958534", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.744498", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Advisory Vote Only.  Should the City give priority to funding the following services and programs: Strengthening public safety and emergency preparedness by filling all vacant police and fire positions and adding additional police and fire personnel; improving streets, access to City facilities for senior citizens and people with disabilities; after school programs and other vital city services; and maintaining adequate reserves to address catastrophic events?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8940, "fingerprint": "2003|200300060|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300060|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d4f40f5f4f8719d3", "measure_id": "200300060", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1340 be adopted to adopt, for a period of five years only, a utility users tax of eight percent (8%) within the City of Rialto to fund such City general fund programs as police and fire protection, street maintenance, and park and recreation services and to authorize an exemption for that tax for low-income and senior-citizen households?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1649, "no_votes": 1644, "total_votes": 3293, "percent_yes": 50.1, "percent_no": 49.9, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.958858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.744678", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1340 be adopted to adopt, for a period of five years only, a utility users tax of eight percent (8%) within the City of Rialto to fund such City general fund programs as police and fire protection, street maintenance, and park and recreation services and to authorize an exemption for that tax for low-income and senior-citizen households?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8943, "fingerprint": "2003|200300127|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300127|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ffb2a59e819fe38f", "measure_id": "200300127", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2550, an initiative ordinance of the People of the City of Redlands consenting to the City's extension beyond December 31, 2003, of the term of the contract with the county of San Bernardino to apportion sales and use tax revenue generated by businesses located within the unincorporated area known as the \"Donut Hole\" and for the City's provision of municipal services to the \"Donut Hole\" and approving an amendment to the City's General Plan relating to development within the City's planning area and sphere of influence, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6084, "no_votes": 2827, "total_votes": 8911, "percent_yes": 68.30000000000001, "percent_no": 31.69999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.959727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.745219", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2550, an initiative ordinance of the People of the City of Redlands consenting to the City's extension beyond December 31, 2003, of the term of the contract with the county of San Bernardino to apportion sales and use tax revenue generated by businesses located within the unincorporated area known as the \"Donut Hole\" and for the City's provision of municipal services to the \"Donut Hole\" and approving an amendment to the City's General Plan relating to development within the City's planning area and sphere of influence, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8944, "fingerprint": "2003|200300128|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300128|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b90e9827d83d4144", "measure_id": "200300128", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance adding chapter 3.42 to the San Bernardino Municipal Code be approved by the voters so that a special tax shall be imposed for ten years to help fund the City's libraries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4935, "no_votes": 4548, "total_votes": 9483, "percent_yes": 52.0, "percent_no": 48.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.960046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.745403", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance adding chapter 3.42 to the San Bernardino Municipal Code be approved by the voters so that a special tax shall be imposed for ten years to help fund the City's libraries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8941, "fingerprint": "2003|200300095|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300095|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "78f77d5234c4bc66", "measure_id": "200300095", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a limited 4 year Special Fire Department Tax terminating June 30, 2007 in the amount of $49.50 per year per parcel, both developed and undeveloped within the Morongo Valley Community Services District, be authorized to fund fire protection and emergency response services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 417, "no_votes": 235, "total_votes": 652, "percent_yes": 64.0, "percent_no": 36.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.959184", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.744859", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a limited 4 year Special Fire Department Tax terminating June 30, 2007 in the amount of $49.50 per year per parcel, both developed and undeveloped within the Morongo Valley Community Services District, be authorized to fund fire protection and emergency response services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8942, "fingerprint": "2003|200300126|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300126|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "200300126", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1931, "no_votes": 1234, "total_votes": 3165, "percent_yes": 61.0, "percent_no": 39.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.959458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.745037", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8958, "fingerprint": "2003|200300165|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300165|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "4f713e83353af477", "measure_id": "200300165", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the San Francisco Unified School District repair and rehabilitate its facilities to current accessibility, health, safety and instructional standards, replace worn-out plumbing, electrical and other major building systems, replace aging heating, ventilation and air handling systems, renovate outdated classrooms and other training facilities, construct facilities to replace bungalows, by issuing $295 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight and no money for school administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 139814, "no_votes": 58254, "total_votes": 198068, "percent_yes": 70.6, "percent_no": 29.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.963988", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.747992", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Francisco Unified School District repair and rehabilitate its facilities to current accessibility, health, safety and instructional standards, replace worn-out plumbing, electrical and other major building systems, replace aging heating, ventilation and air handling systems, renovate outdated classrooms and other training facilities, construct facilities to replace bungalows, by issuing $295 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight and no money for school administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8945, "fingerprint": "2003|200300096|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300096|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3c886cfb37fdb9ee", "measure_id": "200300096", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City be authorized to amend its contract with the Public Employees Retirement System for retirement benefits for certain safety employees if the employees pay any increase in cost?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125142, "no_votes": 62103, "total_votes": 187245, "percent_yes": 66.8, "percent_no": 33.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.960314", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.745581", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City be authorized to amend its contract with the Public Employees Retirement System for retirement benefits for certain safety employees if the employees pay any increase in cost?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8946, "fingerprint": "2003|200300097|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300097|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "aef0d5a4bbac5cab", "measure_id": "200300097", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Controller be required to monitor City services, audit City programs, and investigate complaints, and shall the City set aside at least 0.2% of the annual budget to fund these activities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 133879, "no_votes": 55819, "total_votes": 189698, "percent_yes": 70.6, "percent_no": 29.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.960616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.745765", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Controller be required to monitor City services, audit City programs, and investigate complaints, and shall the City set aside at least 0.2% of the annual budget to fund these activities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8947, "fingerprint": "2003|200300098|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300098|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "28c687adbff76e2c", "measure_id": "200300098", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City be required to have a Small Business Commission to set policies affecting small businesses, with four member appointed by the Mayor and three members appointed by  the Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 104922, "no_votes": 82698, "total_votes": 187620, "percent_yes": 55.900000000000006, "percent_no": 44.099999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.960887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.745944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City be required to have a Small Business Commission to set policies affecting small businesses, with four member appointed by the Mayor and three members appointed by  the Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8948, "fingerprint": "2003|200300099|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300099|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6200ca18d0959c71", "measure_id": "200300099", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City consolidate its governmental ethics law in one code, amend some of those ethics laws, and create new ethics laws?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 114010, "no_votes": 70045, "total_votes": 184055, "percent_yes": 61.9, "percent_no": 38.1, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.961194", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.746122", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City consolidate its governmental ethics law in one code, amend some of those ethics laws, and create new ethics laws?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8949, "fingerprint": "2003|200300100|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300100|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0d9baa591d6d1593", "measure_id": "200300100", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City allow some of its employees to retire early if they are in job classifications where individual positions are being eliminated because of the City's budget shortfall?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 128112, "no_votes": 61465, "total_votes": 189577, "percent_yes": 67.60000000000001, "percent_no": 32.39999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.961492", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.746299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City allow some of its employees to retire early if they are in job classifications where individual positions are being eliminated because of the City's budget shortfall?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8950, "fingerprint": "2003|200300101|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300101|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "53b2abc2eaec28ce", "measure_id": "200300101", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create a \"rainy day\" fund for money collected when there is an unusually large surplus, and for use in years when there is a revenue shortfall?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 146004, "no_votes": 46605, "total_votes": 192609, "percent_yes": 75.8, "percent_no": 24.200000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.961770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.746476", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create a \"rainy day\" fund for money collected when there is an unusually large surplus, and for use in years when there is a revenue shortfall?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8951, "fingerprint": "2003|200300102|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300102|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "8c1f747932af5bb5", "measure_id": "200300102", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase the size of the Police Commission and change how its members are appointed, and shall the Office of Citizen Complaints be authorized to file charges against police officers with the Police Commission.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 99314, "no_votes": 91900, "total_votes": 191214, "percent_yes": 51.9, "percent_no": 48.1, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.962038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.746656", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the size of the Police Commission and change how its members are appointed, and shall the Office of Citizen Complaints be authorized to file charges against police officers with the Police Commission.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8952, "fingerprint": "2003|200300103|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300103|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "06063dcd908461ef", "measure_id": "200300103", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create a program to pay part of the cost of child care and preschool for families with income under a specified limit and with at least one child between three and five years old?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115146, "no_votes": 77256, "total_votes": 192402, "percent_yes": 59.8, "percent_no": 40.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.962306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.746896", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create a program to pay part of the cost of child care and preschool for families with income under a specified limit and with at least one child between three and five years old?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8953, "fingerprint": "2003|200300104|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300104|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "074da80df7025a21", "measure_id": "200300104", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City provide temporary shelter for homeless seniors, youth, families and disabled individuals that is separate from the temporary shelter provided to the general homeless population?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 113564, "no_votes": 79871, "total_votes": 193435, "percent_yes": 58.7, "percent_no": 41.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.962575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.747084", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City provide temporary shelter for homeless seniors, youth, families and disabled individuals that is separate from the temporary shelter provided to the general homeless population?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8954, "fingerprint": "2003|200300105|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300105|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f5a4e178ed9d5e82", "measure_id": "200300105", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City implement a 30-year New Transportation Expenditure Plan directing transportation sales tax funds to improved maintenance of local streets, transportation for the elderly and disabled, the Central Subway, a citywide network of fast and reliable buses, the Caltrain Extension to a new Transbay Terminal, improvements to pedestrian and bicycle safety and other projects and continue the existing half-cent sales tax during implementation of the New Transportation Expenditure Plan and future Plan updates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 142042, "no_votes": 47879, "total_votes": 189921, "percent_yes": 74.8, "percent_no": 25.200000000000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.962846", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.747271", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City implement a 30-year New Transportation Expenditure Plan directing transportation sales tax funds to improved maintenance of local streets, transportation for the elderly and disabled, the Central Subway, a citywide network of fast and reliable buses, the Caltrain Extension to a new Transbay Terminal, improvements to pedestrian and bicycle safety and other projects and continue the existing half-cent sales tax during implementation of the New Transportation Expenditure Plan and future Plan updates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8955, "fingerprint": "2003|200300106|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300106|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "16ce23063bd38b78", "measure_id": "200300106", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City require employers to pay a minimum wage of $8.50 per hour (as adjusted for increases in the regional consumer price index) for work performed in San Francisco?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117140, "no_votes": 79498, "total_votes": 196638, "percent_yes": 59.6, "percent_no": 40.4, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.963187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.747453", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City require employers to pay a minimum wage of $8.50 per hour (as adjusted for increases in the regional consumer price index) for work performed in San Francisco?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8956, "fingerprint": "2003|200300107|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300107|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "270a137024ebf2ce", "measure_id": "200300107", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City replace its anti-begging and aggressive solicitation laws with a new, more specific law that bans solicitation in certain public places and aggressive solicitation in all public places?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117405, "no_votes": 79375, "total_votes": 196780, "percent_yes": 59.7, "percent_no": 40.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.963453", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.747633", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City replace its anti-begging and aggressive solicitation laws with a new, more specific law that bans solicitation in certain public places and aggressive solicitation in all public places?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8957, "fingerprint": "2003|200300108|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300108|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "af65e825a70b0e07", "measure_id": "200300108", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City be prohibited from taking away a taxi permit if the permit holder is unable, because of a disability, to drive the taxi the required minimum number of hours or shifts per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134465, "no_votes": 52326, "total_votes": 186791, "percent_yes": 72.0, "percent_no": 28.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.963721", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.747811", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City be prohibited from taking away a taxi permit if the permit holder is unable, because of a disability, to drive the taxi the required minimum number of hours or shifts per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8959, "fingerprint": "2003|200300026|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300026|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "da1e53caf64377a3", "measure_id": "200300026", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be amended to require the City Council to adopt an annual budget that provides for mandatory minimum staffing levels for police officers and firefighters; and provide for a total reduction of City Councils salaries if staffing levels are not met?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8287, "no_votes": 8441, "total_votes": 16728, "percent_yes": 49.5, "percent_no": 50.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.964256", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.748176", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Stockton City Charter be amended to require the City Council to adopt an annual budget that provides for mandatory minimum staffing levels for police officers and firefighters; and provide for a total reduction of City Councils salaries if staffing levels are not met?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8960, "fingerprint": "2003|200300027|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300027|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "7e0d1995ea874cf5", "measure_id": "200300027", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to amend the Stockton City Charter to require a vote on action(s) by the Stockton City Council to sell, transfer, lease or encumber any part of or interest in City utilities or to enter into a contract in excess of five million dollars with any private or for-profit agency for the operation and maintenance or collection of revenue for City utilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9966, "no_votes": 6713, "total_votes": 16679, "percent_yes": 59.8, "percent_no": 40.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.964557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.748355", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to amend the Stockton City Charter to require a vote on action(s) by the Stockton City Council to sell, transfer, lease or encumber any part of or interest in City utilities or to enter into a contract in excess of five million dollars with any private or for-profit agency for the operation and maintenance or collection of revenue for City utilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8961, "fingerprint": "2003|200300028|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300028|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "b5785fdcee50e3f6", "measure_id": "200300028", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Stockton adopt a Charter amendment to provide that special elections shall be conducted within the time set forth in the Elections Code of the State of California?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13634, "no_votes": 2957, "total_votes": 16591, "percent_yes": 82.19999999999999, "percent_no": 17.80000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.964935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.748534", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Stockton adopt a Charter amendment to provide that special elections shall be conducted within the time set forth in the Elections Code of the State of California?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8962, "fingerprint": "2003|200300029|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300029|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "2f05f69e6d209b04", "measure_id": "200300029", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Stockton be amended to provide that all proceeds and revenue generated for the City's telecommunication, Gas, Electricity, Water, Video Services User Tax (UUT) be budgeted, appropriated and used for police and fire expenditures only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8281, "no_votes": 8358, "total_votes": 16639, "percent_yes": 49.8, "percent_no": 50.2, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.965242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.748717", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Stockton be amended to provide that all proceeds and revenue generated for the City's telecommunication, Gas, Electricity, Water, Video Services User Tax (UUT) be budgeted, appropriated and used for police and fire expenditures only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8963, "fingerprint": "2003|200300166|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300166|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "dfe3d5337f965d6e", "measure_id": "200300166", "measure_letter": "Q2003", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To guarantee reliable funding, improve educational programs, keep small class sizes, provide updated classroom textbooks and supplies, maintain programs that aid students with reading, and continue providing a quality education so our community will remain a great place to live, shall the Hope School District be authorized to implement an instructional parcel tax of $58 per year per parcel for a term not to exceed four years, with an exemption for eligible senior citizens?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2313, "no_votes": 1510, "total_votes": 3823, "percent_yes": 60.5, "percent_no": 39.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.965569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.748904", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To guarantee reliable funding, improve educational programs, keep small class sizes, provide updated classroom textbooks and supplies, maintain programs that aid students with reading, and continue providing a quality education so our community will remain a great place to live, shall the Hope School District be authorized to implement an instructional parcel tax of $58 per year per parcel for a term not to exceed four years, with an exemption for eligible senior citizens?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11897, "fingerprint": "2003|200300168|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300168|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "670032cc95eb9617", "measure_id": "200300168", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renew a community commitment to quality education by maintaining smaller class sizes for all students and to avoid the loss of funding for 21 teaching positions, shall the Menlo Park City Elementary School District continue levying its educational special tax at the current rate of $97/year per taxable parcel beginning 7/1/2004, adjusted annually for Consumer Price Index changes, and increase the appropriations limit annually according to statute, with an exemption available to individuals aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4780, "no_votes": 1128, "total_votes": 5908, "percent_yes": 80.9, "percent_no": 19.099999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.907495", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.969163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.751092", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renew a community commitment to quality education by maintaining smaller class sizes for all students and to avoid the loss of funding for 21 teaching positions, shall the Menlo Park City Elementary School District continue levying its educational special tax at the current rate of $97/year per taxable parcel beginning 7/1/2004, adjusted annually for Consumer Price Index changes, and increase the appropriations limit annually according to statute, with an exemption available to individuals aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11894, "fingerprint": "2003|200300072|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300072|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "54f49336f0aa4be1", "measure_id": "200300072", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To keep good teachers, maintain small class sizes, support reading programs and libraries, and preserve educational quality, shall the Burlingame School district levy an annual special tax of $76 per parcel for 8 years (and raise its annual appropriation limit accordingly) to offset severe school funding cuts arising from California's state budget crisis, with all expenditures monitored by an independent volunteer oversight committee and exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4000, "no_votes": 1550, "total_votes": 5550, "percent_yes": 72.1, "percent_no": 27.900000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.905173", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.966213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.749271", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep good teachers, maintain small class sizes, support reading programs and libraries, and preserve educational quality, shall the Burlingame School district levy an annual special tax of $76 per parcel for 8 years (and raise its annual appropriation limit accordingly) to offset severe school funding cuts arising from California's state budget crisis, with all expenditures monitored by an independent volunteer oversight committee and exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8964, "fingerprint": "2003|200300046|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300046|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4fe8e432f635315a", "measure_id": "200300046", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Cabrillo Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $250.00 on each parcel within the District, each year for five years, exempting parcels owned and occupied by individuals over 65 and vacant parcels, to be used to restore education and support programs, continue class-size reduction, and  provide student transportation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3720, "no_votes": 1971, "total_votes": 5691, "percent_yes": 65.4, "percent_no": 34.599999999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.965914", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.749091", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Cabrillo Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $250.00 on each parcel within the District, each year for five years, exempting parcels owned and occupied by individuals over 65 and vacant parcels, to be used to restore education and support programs, continue class-size reduction, and  provide student transportation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11898, "fingerprint": "2003|200300169|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300169|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ec5740b28927d013", "measure_id": "200300169", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To restore programs lost due to state budget cuts, including funding for remedial math and reading, textbooks and materials, and preparing teachers in the most effective teaching techniques in math, reading and science, shall Menlo Park City Elementary School District levy a supplemental special tax of $73/year per taxable parcel beginning 7/1/2004, adjusted annually for Consumer Price Index changes, and increase the appropriations limit annually according to statute, with an exemption available to individuals aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4581, "no_votes": 1337, "total_votes": 5918, "percent_yes": 77.4, "percent_no": 22.599999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.907779", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.969498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.751279", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore programs lost due to state budget cuts, including funding for remedial math and reading, textbooks and materials, and preparing teachers in the most effective teaching techniques in math, reading and science, shall Menlo Park City Elementary School District levy a supplemental special tax of $73/year per taxable parcel beginning 7/1/2004, adjusted annually for Consumer Price Index changes, and increase the appropriations limit annually according to statute, with an exemption available to individuals aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8967, "fingerprint": "2003|200300075|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300075|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f1526a387730c5ee", "measure_id": "200300075", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain the quality of our local elementary and middle schools, shall San Mateo-Foster City School District collect $75/year per taxable parcel for seven years, with an exemption for seniors, and annual cost of living adjustment, to support small class size, continue art, music, library and technology programs, and to facilitate hiring and retaining qualified teachers and other employees by paying competitive salaries and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be revised by such amount?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11347, "no_votes": 4966, "total_votes": 16313, "percent_yes": 69.6, "percent_no": 30.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.967069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.749819", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain the quality of our local elementary and middle schools, shall San Mateo-Foster City School District collect $75/year per taxable parcel for seven years, with an exemption for seniors, and annual cost of living adjustment, to support small class size, continue art, music, library and technology programs, and to facilitate hiring and retaining qualified teachers and other employees by paying competitive salaries and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be revised by such amount?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11896, "fingerprint": "2003|200300167|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300167|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c19c8bb08f87a04f", "measure_id": "200300167", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure student health and safety, modernize aging facilities and accommodate expected enrollment growth, shall Brisbane School District issue $11,000,000 in bonds bearing interest at lawful rates to repair, renovate, and furnish its three schools, including electrical, heating, lighting, and plumbing upgrades, seismic retrofitting, handicapped access improvements, computer wiring and equipment, and to match up to $1,500,000 in State grants, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 706, "no_votes": 377, "total_votes": 1083, "percent_yes": 65.2, "percent_no": 34.8, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.907196", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.968861", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.750912", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure student health and safety, modernize aging facilities and accommodate expected enrollment growth, shall Brisbane School District issue $11,000,000 in bonds bearing interest at lawful rates to repair, renovate, and furnish its three schools, including electrical, heating, lighting, and plumbing upgrades, seismic retrofitting, handicapped access improvements, computer wiring and equipment, and to match up to $1,500,000 in State grants, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits, and no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8965, "fingerprint": "2003|200300073|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300073|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a2004b0ea3609148", "measure_id": "200300073", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Cabrillo Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $250.00 on each parcel within the District, each year for five years, exempting parcels owned and occupied by individuals over 65 and vacant parcels, to be used to restore education and support programs, continue class-size reduction, and provide student transportation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4895, "no_votes": 2530, "total_votes": 7425, "percent_yes": 65.9, "percent_no": 34.099999999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.966532", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.749456", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Cabrillo Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $250.00 on each parcel within the District, each year for five years, exempting parcels owned and occupied by individuals over 65 and vacant parcels, to be used to restore education and support programs, continue class-size reduction, and provide student transportation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11895, "fingerprint": "2003|200300129|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300129|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "02b9918b8991ea95", "measure_id": "200300129", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance entitled The Build Our School Now Initiative be adopted to amend the Wavecrest Village draft specific plan and the City of Half Moon Bay Local Coastal Land Use Plan to change the location where these plans provide for a new middle school to be constructed from the Wavecrest Village to the downtown area east of Highway 1?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1375, "no_votes": 1661, "total_votes": 3036, "percent_yes": 45.3, "percent_no": 54.7, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.906074", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.967390", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.750002", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance entitled The Build Our School Now Initiative be adopted to amend the Wavecrest Village draft specific plan and the City of Half Moon Bay Local Coastal Land Use Plan to change the location where these plans provide for a new middle school to be constructed from the Wavecrest Village to the downtown area east of Highway 1?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8966, "fingerprint": "2003|200300074|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300074|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9667143cc2408153", "measure_id": "200300074", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To promote early reading and literacy, retain quality teachers and staff, maintain small class sizes, keep school libraries staffed, support reading, writing, mathematics, arts, foreign  language and technology, and maintain safe schools, shall the San Carlos School District levy a special tax of $98.00 per parcel beginning on July 1, 2003, for eight years, adjustable by no more than 3% annually based on the Consumer Price Index and offering an exemption to individuals 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4201, "no_votes": 1780, "total_votes": 5981, "percent_yes": 70.19999999999999, "percent_no": 29.80000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.966801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.749638", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To promote early reading and literacy, retain quality teachers and staff, maintain small class sizes, keep school libraries staffed, support reading, writing, mathematics, arts, foreign  language and technology, and maintain safe schools, shall the San Carlos School District levy a special tax of $98.00 per parcel beginning on July 1, 2003, for eight years, adjustable by no more than 3% annually based on the Consumer Price Index and offering an exemption to individuals 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8968, "fingerprint": "2003|200300130|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300130|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "dd45a0a5086dec1e", "measure_id": "200300130", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Downtown Zoning Initiative submitted and circulated by the Alliance for a Better Downtown Milllbrae establishing a 25% limitation on the number of restaurants in the Downtown Improvement Area, as well as prohibiting specified uses and requiring conditional use permits for other specified uses in said Area, be enacted as an amendment of Millbrae Municipal Code Section 10-1.407?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1735, "no_votes": 2342, "total_votes": 4077, "percent_yes": 42.6, "percent_no": 57.4, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.967662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.750185", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Downtown Zoning Initiative submitted and circulated by the Alliance for a Better Downtown Milllbrae establishing a 25% limitation on the number of restaurants in the Downtown Improvement Area, as well as prohibiting specified uses and requiring conditional use permits for other specified uses in said Area, be enacted as an amendment of Millbrae Municipal Code Section 10-1.407?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8970, "fingerprint": "2003|200300132|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300132|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "38d81f599befac14", "measure_id": "200300132", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should Section 32.75 of the Municipal code of the city of Redwood City be amended to increase the uniform transient occupancy tax by 2%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4678, "no_votes": 2515, "total_votes": 7193, "percent_yes": 65.0, "percent_no": 35.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.968262", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.750553", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Section 32.75 of the Municipal code of the city of Redwood City be amended to increase the uniform transient occupancy tax by 2%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8971, "fingerprint": "2003|200300133|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300133|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9c874041a04b9bcd", "measure_id": "200300133", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall specified sections of the City Charter be amended to update amounts requiring public bid procedures for public works contracts, to conform the City's tort claim procedures to state law, to give the City flexibility in selecting its official advertiser, to restrict appointed board and commission members from interfering in the administration and management of city departments, and to set the maximum payment period of bonds at thirty-five (35) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5249, "no_votes": 1822, "total_votes": 7071, "percent_yes": 74.2, "percent_no": 25.799999999999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.968561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.750733", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall specified sections of the City Charter be amended to update amounts requiring public bid procedures for public works contracts, to conform the City's tort claim procedures to state law, to give the City flexibility in selecting its official advertiser, to restrict appointed board and commission members from interfering in the administration and management of city departments, and to set the maximum payment period of bonds at thirty-five (35) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8969, "fingerprint": "2003|200300131|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300131|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9304daf402571d82", "measure_id": "200300131", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2003-350 be adopted to add a Special Residential District to the Zoning Ordinance that conforms with General Plan policies for three parcels in the Nathhorst Triangle Area to reduce potential office development and encourage residences smaller and less expensive than typical residences in town?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 921, "no_votes": 991, "total_votes": 1912, "percent_yes": 48.2, "percent_no": 51.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.967963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.750370", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2003-350 be adopted to add a Special Residential District to the Zoning Ordinance that conforms with General Plan policies for three parcels in the Nathhorst Triangle Area to reduce potential office development and encourage residences smaller and less expensive than typical residences in town?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11902, "fingerprint": "2003|200300170|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300170|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4a902d193330dd44", "measure_id": "200300170", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Oak Grove School District be authorized to increase the rate of a special tax by $30 per parcel per year, and increase its Gann Appropriations Limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, allowing the district to continue to use the funds generated for critical school expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3811, "no_votes": 4167, "total_votes": 7978, "percent_yes": 47.8, "percent_no": 52.2, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.910835", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.971935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.752751", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oak Grove School District be authorized to increase the rate of a special tax by $30 per parcel per year, and increase its Gann Appropriations Limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, allowing the district to continue to use the funds generated for critical school expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11899, "fingerprint": "2003|200300079|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300079|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6510a140223bc512", "measure_id": "200300079", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education, avoid further reductions in essential programs, ensure adequate textbooks, instructional materials, and reduced class sizes, and retain experienced teachers and school library professionals, shall San Jose Unified School District be authorized to levy a tax for 5 years only of $98 per parcel, or, for multiple dwelling units on one parcel, $40 per unit with a cap, with a maximum annual 2% inflation adjustment and an exemption for principal residence owners age 65 or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13343, "no_votes": 8848, "total_votes": 22191, "percent_yes": 60.1, "percent_no": 39.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.909728", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.970941", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.752202", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education, avoid further reductions in essential programs, ensure adequate textbooks, instructional materials, and reduced class sizes, and retain experienced teachers and school library professionals, shall San Jose Unified School District be authorized to levy a tax for 5 years only of $98 per parcel, or, for multiple dwelling units on one parcel, $40 per unit with a cap, with a maximum annual 2% inflation adjustment and an exemption for principal residence owners age 65 or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8972, "fingerprint": "2003|200300030|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300030|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5479b744aeaca671", "measure_id": "200300030", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve airport security, convenience, relieve traffic, and reduce construction costs, shall the City be authorized to add space for Federally required security measures, improved passenger facilities, and nine new gates, once Highway 87, a full interchange at Coleman Avenue and Highway 880, the airport street system are within three years of completion, and City Council identifies funding to connect Airport with BART or light rail, without raising taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32295, "no_votes": 22897, "total_votes": 55192, "percent_yes": 58.5, "percent_no": 41.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.969773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.751459", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve airport security, convenience, relieve traffic, and reduce construction costs, shall the City be authorized to add space for Federally required security measures, improved passenger facilities, and nine new gates, once Highway 87, a full interchange at Coleman Avenue and Highway 880, the airport street system are within three years of completion, and City Council identifies funding to connect Airport with BART or light rail, without raising taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11900, "fingerprint": "2003|200300134|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300134|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4cd8b6001cd42a81", "measure_id": "200300134", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to 1) forbid the City from adding fluoride or any fluorine-containing substance to drinking water for the  purpose of treating or affecting the physical or mental functions of the body of any person; and, 2) require a total exposure assessment, U.S. FDA approval, and specific restrictions on  contaminants before the City can consider adding fluoride to drinking water in the future; and, 3) repeal all contrary laws?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3167, "no_votes": 12385, "total_votes": 15552, "percent_yes": 20.4, "percent_no": 79.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.910096", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.971342", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.752385", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to 1) forbid the City from adding fluoride or any fluorine-containing substance to drinking water for the  purpose of treating or affecting the physical or mental functions of the body of any person; and, 2) require a total exposure assessment, U.S. FDA approval, and specific restrictions on  contaminants before the City can consider adding fluoride to drinking water in the future; and, 3) repeal all contrary laws?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8973, "fingerprint": "2003|200300076|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300076|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ac3039e64051136c", "measure_id": "200300076", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To keep experienced teachers, prevent teacher layoffs, keep school libraries accessible to students, preserve small class sizes, maintain academic programs including arts, music and technology, and provide local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Campbell Union School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $180.00 per parcel each year for 4 years, with an exemption for residential  owners 65 and older, and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be revised by such amount?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4941, "no_votes": 3724, "total_votes": 8665, "percent_yes": 56.99999999999999, "percent_no": 43.00000000000001, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.970126", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.751644", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To keep experienced teachers, prevent teacher layoffs, keep school libraries accessible to students, preserve small class sizes, maintain academic programs including arts, music and technology, and provide local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Campbell Union School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $180.00 per parcel each year for 4 years, with an exemption for residential  owners 65 and older, and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be revised by such amount?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11901, "fingerprint": "2003|200300135|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300135|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1b7ee1b7a3fcb0b9", "measure_id": "200300135", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 4770 be adopted to approve a rezoning and height variance for the property at 800 High  Street to permit a 96,200 square foot housing project including 61 housing units ( with 10 affordable units), 201 underground parking spaces (with 63 available for public use), and about 1900 square feet of neighborhood serving retail space?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8060, "no_votes": 7448, "total_votes": 15508, "percent_yes": 52.0, "percent_no": 48.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.910481", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.971613", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.752564", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 4770 be adopted to approve a rezoning and height variance for the property at 800 High  Street to permit a 96,200 square foot housing project including 61 housing units ( with 10 affordable units), 201 underground parking spaces (with 63 available for public use), and about 1900 square feet of neighborhood serving retail space?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8974, "fingerprint": "2003|200300077|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300077|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "992ae2ebfbf34e22", "measure_id": "200300077", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide equal educational programs and materials to Franklin-McKinley Elementary School District children as those in other Santa Clara schools, shall Franklin-McKinley Elementary School District levy an annual special tax of $8 per month per parcel, (with the annual appropriations limit reauthorized by voters) with annual cost of living increase capped at 3%, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years or older to keep libraries open, purchase books, support science, reading, counseling programs and maintain small class sizes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1777, "no_votes": 1321, "total_votes": 3098, "percent_yes": 57.4, "percent_no": 42.6, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.970396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.751829", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide equal educational programs and materials to Franklin-McKinley Elementary School District children as those in other Santa Clara schools, shall Franklin-McKinley Elementary School District levy an annual special tax of $8 per month per parcel, (with the annual appropriations limit reauthorized by voters) with annual cost of living increase capped at 3%, exempting parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years or older to keep libraries open, purchase books, support science, reading, counseling programs and maintain small class sizes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8975, "fingerprint": "2003|200300078|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300078|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "bd526609591207ae", "measure_id": "200300078", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain quality education for students by attracting and retaining qualified and experienced teachers and staff, keeping class sizes small, maintaining arts and music programs and continuing educational programs that enhance student achievement with no money for administrator salaries, shall the Mountain View-Whisman School District be authorized to levy a $0.05 per square foot annual tax on buildings and other property improvements for five years exempting the principal residence owned by persons 65 years of age or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5395, "no_votes": 3097, "total_votes": 8492, "percent_yes": 63.5, "percent_no": 36.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.970665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.752019", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain quality education for students by attracting and retaining qualified and experienced teachers and staff, keeping class sizes small, maintaining arts and music programs and continuing educational programs that enhance student achievement with no money for administrator salaries, shall the Mountain View-Whisman School District be authorized to levy a $0.05 per square foot annual tax on buildings and other property improvements for five years exempting the principal residence owned by persons 65 years of age or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8976, "fingerprint": "2003|200300080|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300080|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a4de820e6e600052", "measure_id": "200300080", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To minimize educational cuts, including science instructors, qualified teachers, and school libraries, shall the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District collect $11.25/month per taxable parcel for five years, with independent citizen oversight and exemptions for parcels owned/occupied by seniors (65+), for educational purposes such as: Smaller class sizes, Retaining qualified teachers, Science and computer instruction, Arts and music education, Advance classes for college preparation, and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be raised by such amount?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2736, "no_votes": 2648, "total_votes": 5384, "percent_yes": 50.8, "percent_no": 49.2, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.972210", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.752935", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To minimize educational cuts, including science instructors, qualified teachers, and school libraries, shall the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District collect $11.25/month per taxable parcel for five years, with independent citizen oversight and exemptions for parcels owned/occupied by seniors (65+), for educational purposes such as: Smaller class sizes, Retaining qualified teachers, Science and computer instruction, Arts and music education, Advance classes for college preparation, and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be raised by such amount?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8977, "fingerprint": "2003|200300081|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300081|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "f4650ab907f855a6", "measure_id": "200300081", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent closure of neighborhood elementary schools; preserve class size reduction (K-3) and prevent 60% increase in class size; purchase textbooks and instructional materials; fund art, music and academic programs; retain quality teachers and librarians, shall the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District levy an assessment of $6.75/month per parcel for five years, beginning July 1, 2003, exempting parcels owned/occupied by seniors (65+), with independent community oversight and accountability to ensure funds are used only to improve student learning?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7524, "no_votes": 3576, "total_votes": 11100, "percent_yes": 67.80000000000001, "percent_no": 32.19999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.972543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.753119", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent closure of neighborhood elementary schools; preserve class size reduction (K-3) and prevent 60% increase in class size; purchase textbooks and instructional materials; fund art, music and academic programs; retain quality teachers and librarians, shall the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District levy an assessment of $6.75/month per parcel for five years, beginning July 1, 2003, exempting parcels owned/occupied by seniors (65+), with independent community oversight and accountability to ensure funds are used only to improve student learning?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8978, "fingerprint": "2003|200300171|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300171|SHASTA", "content_hash": "780adbe946983141", "measure_id": "200300171", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify for State matching funds and to reduce classrooms overcrowding by constructing and equipping a new elementary school, shall Cottonwood Union School District, issue $2,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with Strict Accountability Safeguards, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1111, "no_votes": 567, "total_votes": 1678, "percent_yes": 66.2, "percent_no": 33.8, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.972871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.753299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify for State matching funds and to reduce classrooms overcrowding by constructing and equipping a new elementary school, shall Cottonwood Union School District, issue $2,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with Strict Accountability Safeguards, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8979, "fingerprint": "2003|200300136|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300136|SOLANO", "content_hash": "7c32c46ba760d5c4", "measure_id": "200300136", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan be amended to prohibit uses requiring urban facilities or services beyond the Urban Growth Boundary (\"UGB\"); to modify the UGB to incorporate the Northgate Christian Fellowship property inside the UGB; and to require a vote of the people to modify General Plan provisions related to the Urban Growth Boundary?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4985, "no_votes": 2181, "total_votes": 7166, "percent_yes": 69.6, "percent_no": 30.400000000000006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.973173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.753478", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan be amended to prohibit uses requiring urban facilities or services beyond the Urban Growth Boundary (\"UGB\"); to modify the UGB to incorporate the Northgate Christian Fellowship property inside the UGB; and to require a vote of the people to modify General Plan provisions related to the Urban Growth Boundary?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8982, "fingerprint": "2003|200300139|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300139|SOLANO", "content_hash": "970185c6eabdac8b", "measure_id": "200300139", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Initiative Measure (Ordinance No. 2003-10) be adopted requiring voter approval of changes to the General Plan relating only to (1) the Travis Reserve, (2) the Urban Limit Line, and (3) Airport Noise Standard?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7130, "no_votes": 4755, "total_votes": 11885, "percent_yes": 60.0, "percent_no": 40.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.974006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.754053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Initiative Measure (Ordinance No. 2003-10) be adopted requiring voter approval of changes to the General Plan relating only to (1) the Travis Reserve, (2) the Urban Limit Line, and (3) Airport Noise Standard?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8980, "fingerprint": "2003|200300137|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300137|SOLANO", "content_hash": "283f2c2724d76d0b", "measure_id": "200300137", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan policies related to the Urban Growth Boundary (\"UGB\") be reaffirmed and readopted to prohibit urban development beyond the UGB except for religious assembly and schools by use permit and public parks, and public/private recreation uses that do not require substantial public facilities or services and other public/semi public uses including golf courses under certain limited conditions; and be amended to require a vote of the people to modify these policies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2345, "no_votes": 4741, "total_votes": 7086, "percent_yes": 33.1, "percent_no": 66.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.973471", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.753675", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan policies related to the Urban Growth Boundary (\"UGB\") be reaffirmed and readopted to prohibit urban development beyond the UGB except for religious assembly and schools by use permit and public parks, and public/private recreation uses that do not require substantial public facilities or services and other public/semi public uses including golf courses under certain limited conditions; and be amended to require a vote of the people to modify these policies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8983, "fingerprint": "2003|200300172|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300172|SOLANO", "content_hash": "40426e7418a722f9", "measure_id": "200300172", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Davis School District renew its special tax for four years at the annual rate of $82.95 per dwelling for multi-dwelling parcels and $165.90 per parcel for other parcels, to provide enhanced reading programs, increased instructional programs, reduced class size at selected grades; additional nursing, counseling and support services for students; supplemental staff training, classroom and library materials and technological services; and shall the appropriations limit be increased by the amount of the special tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 3, "percent_yes": 66.7, "percent_no": 33.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.974275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.754232", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Davis School District renew its special tax for four years at the annual rate of $82.95 per dwelling for multi-dwelling parcels and $165.90 per parcel for other parcels, to provide enhanced reading programs, increased instructional programs, reduced class size at selected grades; additional nursing, counseling and support services for students; supplemental staff training, classroom and library materials and technological services; and shall the appropriations limit be increased by the amount of the special tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8981, "fingerprint": "2003|200300138|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300138|SOLANO", "content_hash": "67a4301b63ac5dd2", "measure_id": "200300138", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To acquire and construct a new police building designed to essential service standards with a 911 Center, a secure prisoner holding facility, parking for the public, City staff, and official vehicles, and civic center improvements to address deferred maintenance, parking for other government center functions, and the remodeling of the existing police building for city offices, shall the City of Benicia be authorized to issue general obligation bonds for the maximum principal amount of $14,000,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3706, "no_votes": 3681, "total_votes": 7387, "percent_yes": 50.2, "percent_no": 49.8, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.973739", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.753867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire and construct a new police building designed to essential service standards with a 911 Center, a secure prisoner holding facility, parking for the public, City staff, and official vehicles, and civic center improvements to address deferred maintenance, parking for other government center functions, and the remodeling of the existing police building for city offices, shall the City of Benicia be authorized to issue general obligation bonds for the maximum principal amount of $14,000,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8984, "fingerprint": "2003|200300140|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300140|SONOMA", "content_hash": "137d8151121d2c33", "measure_id": "200300140", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For the purpose of increasing sales tax revenues to maintain essential and important city services, shall Cotati's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance be amended to modify an existing limitation of retail uses outside the downtown Hub area on a limited number of commercial parcels located west of US 101 and north of Highway 116, where any commercial projects located thereon, will completely comply with all applicable comprehensive city processing regulations, CEQA, and public hearing requirements.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1047, "no_votes": 1013, "total_votes": 2060, "percent_yes": 50.8, "percent_no": 49.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.974692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.754412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the purpose of increasing sales tax revenues to maintain essential and important city services, shall Cotati's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance be amended to modify an existing limitation of retail uses outside the downtown Hub area on a limited number of commercial parcels located west of US 101 and north of Highway 116, where any commercial projects located thereon, will completely comply with all applicable comprehensive city processing regulations, CEQA, and public hearing requirements.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8985, "fingerprint": "2003|200300141|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300141|SONOMA", "content_hash": "942a7aafd66db2b0", "measure_id": "200300141", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Petaluma Charter be amended to allow for the adoption of a special utility users tax on gas and electric service for 20 years, at a rate of no more than five percent (5%) of the monthly charge for the service, to pay for curb-to-curb repair and reconstruction of existing City Streets and not for the construction of new streets?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3828, "no_votes": 7215, "total_votes": 11043, "percent_yes": 34.7, "percent_no": 65.3, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.975038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.754598", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Petaluma Charter be amended to allow for the adoption of a special utility users tax on gas and electric service for 20 years, at a rate of no more than five percent (5%) of the monthly charge for the service, to pay for curb-to-curb repair and reconstruction of existing City Streets and not for the construction of new streets?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8986, "fingerprint": "2003|200300142|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300142|SONOMA", "content_hash": "d1ed7d811326634f", "measure_id": "200300142", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special tax be approved on users of gas and electric service for 20 years, at a rate of no more than five percent (5%) of the monthly charge of the service, with an annual cap for non-residential users and an exemption for service users who participate in PG&E's CARE program, to pay for curb-to-curb repair and reconstruction of existing City streets and not for the construction of new streets?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3747, "no_votes": 7298, "total_votes": 11045, "percent_yes": 33.900000000000006, "percent_no": 66.1, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.975305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.754784", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax be approved on users of gas and electric service for 20 years, at a rate of no more than five percent (5%) of the monthly charge of the service, with an annual cap for non-residential users and an exemption for service users who participate in PG&E's CARE program, to pay for curb-to-curb repair and reconstruction of existing City streets and not for the construction of new streets?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8987, "fingerprint": "2003|200300178|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300178|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4715359dc3f5a379", "measure_id": "200300178", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on September 10, 2003 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Sonoma County ordering a reorganization consisting of dissolution of the Graton Sanitation Zone of the Sonoma County Water Agency, formation of the Graton Community Services District, and designation of the Graton Community Services District as the successor in interest to the Graton Sanitation Zone be approved, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 294, "no_votes": 58, "total_votes": 352, "percent_yes": 83.5, "percent_no": 16.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-12-16", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.975572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.754964", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on September 10, 2003 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Sonoma County ordering a reorganization consisting of dissolution of the Graton Sanitation Zone of the Sonoma County Water Agency, formation of the Graton Community Services District, and designation of the Graton Community Services District as the successor in interest to the Graton Sanitation Zone be approved, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8988, "fingerprint": "2003|200300143|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300143|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "fe6ac301b2bc39d5", "measure_id": "200300143", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to minimize sprawl, reduce transportation costs, maintain farmland, and secure the fees necessary to provide for the cost of needed services, shall the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors direct urban development into the incorporated cities of Stanislaus County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17263, "no_votes": 8326, "total_votes": 25589, "percent_yes": 67.5, "percent_no": 32.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.975907", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.755153", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to minimize sprawl, reduce transportation costs, maintain farmland, and secure the fees necessary to provide for the cost of needed services, shall the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors direct urban development into the incorporated cities of Stanislaus County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8989, "fingerprint": "2003|200300144|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300144|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "de2adc9ca15ccbf8", "measure_id": "200300144", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to change the runoff election date from December of odd-numbered years to March of even-numbered years, commencing with the year 2004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10503, "no_votes": 14440, "total_votes": 24943, "percent_yes": 42.1, "percent_no": 57.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.976229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.755338", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to change the runoff election date from December of odd-numbered years to March of even-numbered years, commencing with the year 2004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8995, "fingerprint": "2003|200300174|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300174|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "bceba950d6f22a8a", "measure_id": "200300174", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Turlock Joint Union High School District and the Turlock Joint Elementary School District be reorganized into a new unified school district, the Turlock Joint Unified School District? If approved, the Turlock Joint Unified School District would be governed by a seven (7) member Board of Trustees elected at large.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3254, "no_votes": 2640, "total_votes": 5894, "percent_yes": 55.2, "percent_no": 44.8, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.977985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.756426", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Turlock Joint Union High School District and the Turlock Joint Elementary School District be reorganized into a new unified school district, the Turlock Joint Unified School District? If approved, the Turlock Joint Unified School District would be governed by a seven (7) member Board of Trustees elected at large.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8990, "fingerprint": "2003|200300145|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300145|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "76593e87fa9587b6", "measure_id": "200300145", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to impose prospectively a two-term limit on the offices of Mayor and Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13337, "no_votes": 12930, "total_votes": 26267, "percent_yes": 50.8, "percent_no": 49.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.976498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.755518", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to impose prospectively a two-term limit on the offices of Mayor and Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8991, "fingerprint": "2003|200300146|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300146|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "1faf6343bd5a01db", "measure_id": "200300146", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Advisory Vote Only. Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following described areas of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan provided the areas are first annexed to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13510, "no_votes": 11740, "total_votes": 25250, "percent_yes": 53.5, "percent_no": 46.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.976797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.755700", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Advisory Vote Only. Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following described areas of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan provided the areas are first annexed to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8992, "fingerprint": "2003|200300147|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300147|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "255c5202ac041a6d", "measure_id": "200300147", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Advisory Vote Only. Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following described areas of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan provided the area is first annexed to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15649, "no_votes": 9489, "total_votes": 25138, "percent_yes": 62.3, "percent_no": 37.7, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.977123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.755879", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Advisory Vote Only. Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following described areas of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan provided the area is first annexed to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8993, "fingerprint": "2003|200300148|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300148|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "255c5202ac041a6d", "measure_id": "200300148", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Advisory Vote Only. Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following described areas of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan provided the area is first annexed to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15209, "no_votes": 9129, "total_votes": 24338, "percent_yes": 62.5, "percent_no": 37.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.977392", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.756059", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Advisory Vote Only. Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following described areas of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan provided the area is first annexed to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8994, "fingerprint": "2003|200300173|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300173|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a51baf03a5b0e602", "measure_id": "200300173", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to build a new Riverbank High School Gymnasium and Performing Arts building, modernize and improve school facilities, add needed classrooms throughout the District and build an elementary school, shall the Riverbank Unified School District issue $14 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a Citizen's Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 729, "no_votes": 426, "total_votes": 1155, "percent_yes": 63.1, "percent_no": 36.9, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.977659", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.756242", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to build a new Riverbank High School Gymnasium and Performing Arts building, modernize and improve school facilities, add needed classrooms throughout the District and build an elementary school, shall the Riverbank Unified School District issue $14 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a Citizen's Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1137, "fingerprint": "2003|CA1115|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|CA1115|Statewide", "content_hash": "cfeadb7a5f9c8e50", "measure_id": "CA1115", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 53", "description": "Infrastructure: Finance. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.09999847, "percent_no": 63.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: PreK-12 | Natural Resources | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment would have changed how California finances infr...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment would have changed how California finances infrastructure projects by modifying the state's borrowing and debt requirements. The measure aimed to alter the legislative process for approving infrastructure funding through constitutional changes to existing finance mechanisms.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 53", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_53_(2003)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2003/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2003", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2053%202003", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2053%202003", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1136, "fingerprint": "2003|CA1114|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|CA1114|Statewide", "content_hash": "9448eb2544367676", "measure_id": "CA1114", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 54", "description": "Classification By Race, Ethnicity, Color or National Origin. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.09999847, "percent_no": 63.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have amended the California Constitution to prohibi...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have amended the California Constitution to prohibit the state from classifying people by race, ethnicity, color, or national origin in public employment, education, and contracting. The measure would have effectively ended affirmative action programs in these areas by banning the consideration of these demographic characteristics.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 54", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_54_(2003)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2003/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2003", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2054%202003", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2054%202003", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 8996, "fingerprint": "2003|200300031|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300031|TULARE", "content_hash": "4009ab70b565e398", "measure_id": "200300031", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to make certain technical, non-substantive revisions which do not materially alter, increase or decrease the home rule powers of the City of Porterville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1315, "no_votes": 1038, "total_votes": 2353, "percent_yes": 55.900000000000006, "percent_no": 44.099999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.978279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.756605", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to make certain technical, non-substantive revisions which do not materially alter, increase or decrease the home rule powers of the City of Porterville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8997, "fingerprint": "2003|200300032|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300032|TULARE", "content_hash": "6e455b42b471d415", "measure_id": "200300032", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to change the election date for Council seats to be the same as the date for the California State Primary election for State officers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1607, "no_votes": 875, "total_votes": 2482, "percent_yes": 64.7, "percent_no": 35.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.978579", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.756786", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to change the election date for Council seats to be the same as the date for the California State Primary election for State officers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8998, "fingerprint": "2003|200300033|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300033|TULARE", "content_hash": "ff439aa0ba081f96", "measure_id": "200300033", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to change the method of filling Council vacancies which occur as a result of a recall to provide that a special election shall occur at the same time as the recall election to fill any such vacancy created by a successful recall?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1560, "no_votes": 840, "total_votes": 2400, "percent_yes": 65.0, "percent_no": 35.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.978879", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.756965", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to change the method of filling Council vacancies which occur as a result of a recall to provide that a special election shall occur at the same time as the recall election to fill any such vacancy created by a successful recall?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 8999, "fingerprint": "2003|200300034|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300034|TULARE", "content_hash": "3a941c800b4e10bd", "measure_id": "200300034", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to increase the compensation paid to Council Members to $50.00 per meeting and to the Mayor $60.00 per meeting?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1590, "no_votes": 866, "total_votes": 2456, "percent_yes": 64.7, "percent_no": 35.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.979145", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.757232", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to increase the compensation paid to Council Members to $50.00 per meeting and to the Mayor $60.00 per meeting?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9000, "fingerprint": "2003|200300035|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300035|TULARE", "content_hash": "d79a16c762590bb9", "measure_id": "200300035", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to establish the time for the Council to select its President (Mayor) and Vice-President, the length of the term of said offices, and permitting their removal by a 4/5th vote of the Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1276, "no_votes": 1122, "total_votes": 2398, "percent_yes": 53.2, "percent_no": 46.8, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.979432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.757420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to establish the time for the Council to select its President (Mayor) and Vice-President, the length of the term of said offices, and permitting their removal by a 4/5th vote of the Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9001, "fingerprint": "2003|200300036|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300036|TULARE", "content_hash": "a7629a44004a7283", "measure_id": "200300036", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to establish the time for the council to select its President (Mayor) and Vice-President, the length of the term of said offices, and permitting their removal by a majority vote of the Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1381, "no_votes": 1010, "total_votes": 2391, "percent_yes": 57.8, "percent_no": 42.2, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.979700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.757601", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to establish the time for the council to select its President (Mayor) and Vice-President, the length of the term of said offices, and permitting their removal by a majority vote of the Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9002, "fingerprint": "2003|200300037|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300037|TULARE", "content_hash": "2964d15b2a441db6", "measure_id": "200300037", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to add a Section to encourage public participation in City matters and affairs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1895, "no_votes": 546, "total_votes": 2441, "percent_yes": 77.60000000000001, "percent_no": 22.39999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.979974", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.757782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to add a Section to encourage public participation in City matters and affairs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9003, "fingerprint": "2003|200300038|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300038|TULARE", "content_hash": "b9b13e6b52495e7e", "measure_id": "200300038", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to allow the current City council to set, by ordinance approved by 4/5th vote, both the maximum amount of expenditure of City funds allowed without prior Council approval, and the amount is a revolving cash fund, provided that said amounts can only be subsequently increased after each future City Council election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1188, "no_votes": 1168, "total_votes": 2356, "percent_yes": 50.4, "percent_no": 49.6, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.980236", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.757962", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to allow the current City council to set, by ordinance approved by 4/5th vote, both the maximum amount of expenditure of City funds allowed without prior Council approval, and the amount is a revolving cash fund, provided that said amounts can only be subsequently increased after each future City Council election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9004, "fingerprint": "2003|200300039|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300039|TULARE", "content_hash": "c59f58a3e78460a2", "measure_id": "200300039", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Charter be amended to increase the minimum cost of public works projects which must be subject to competitive bidding requirements to $15,000.00 and to provide for automatic increases in said amount every two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1350, "no_votes": 1065, "total_votes": 2415, "percent_yes": 55.900000000000006, "percent_no": 44.099999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.980498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.758140", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Charter be amended to increase the minimum cost of public works projects which must be subject to competitive bidding requirements to $15,000.00 and to provide for automatic increases in said amount every two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9005, "fingerprint": "2003|200300175|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300175|TULARE", "content_hash": "95d856b8e22af4e9", "measure_id": "200300175", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Strathmore Union High School District and all of its territory be transferred to the Porterville Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 510, "no_votes": 316, "total_votes": 826, "percent_yes": 61.7, "percent_no": 38.3, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.980943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.758319", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Strathmore Union High School District and all of its territory be transferred to the Porterville Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9006, "fingerprint": "2003|200300176|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300176|TULARE", "content_hash": "7622cb9fe9759cfe", "measure_id": "200300176", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to meet the educational needs of Tulare's growing high school age population and support Tulare's economic growth, shall the Tulare Joint Union High School District build a new high school and other related facilities and modernize the Tulare Western High School Swim Complex and shall the district issue $45 million of bonds at the lowest competitive interest rates within legal limits so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizen's advisory committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2585, "no_votes": 1308, "total_votes": 3893, "percent_yes": 66.4, "percent_no": 33.599999999999994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.981226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.758506", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to meet the educational needs of Tulare's growing high school age population and support Tulare's economic growth, shall the Tulare Joint Union High School District build a new high school and other related facilities and modernize the Tulare Western High School Swim Complex and shall the district issue $45 million of bonds at the lowest competitive interest rates within legal limits so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizen's advisory committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9007, "fingerprint": "2003|200300047|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300047|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "52e7e3d03a14f74c", "measure_id": "200300047", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide for the safety and needs of our students and community, shall the Columbia Union School District: improve the safety of Parrotts Ferry entrances, exits, student loading and unloading zones; expand parking; construct a community multi-use facility with an outdoor amphitheater; provide additional school facilities and qualify the district for $1.67 million in state matching funds and for such purposes shall the district issue $3.6 million of bonds at a rate within legal limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 937, "no_votes": 480, "total_votes": 1417, "percent_yes": 66.10000000000001, "percent_no": 33.89999999999999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-03-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.981495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.758692", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide for the safety and needs of our students and community, shall the Columbia Union School District: improve the safety of Parrotts Ferry entrances, exits, student loading and unloading zones; expand parking; construct a community multi-use facility with an outdoor amphitheater; provide additional school facilities and qualify the district for $1.67 million in state matching funds and for such purposes shall the district issue $3.6 million of bonds at a rate within legal limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9008, "fingerprint": "2003|200300061|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300061|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e1763e1c7b89190a", "measure_id": "200300061", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance approving an ordinance adjusting Santa Paula's city urban growth boundary (curb) line to include a 32.5 acre parcel at the northwest corner of Peck/Foothill roads be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1247, "no_votes": 981, "total_votes": 2228, "percent_yes": 56.00000000000001, "percent_no": 43.99999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-06-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.981821", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.758872", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance approving an ordinance adjusting Santa Paula's city urban growth boundary (curb) line to include a 32.5 acre parcel at the northwest corner of Peck/Foothill roads be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9009, "fingerprint": "2003|200300177|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2003|200300177|YOLO", "content_hash": "40426e7418a722f9", "measure_id": "200300177", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2003, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Davis School District renew its special tax for four years at the annual rate of $82.95 per dwelling for multi-dwelling parcels and $165.90 per parcel for other parcels, to provide enhanced reading programs, increased instructional programs, reduced class size at selected grades; additional nursing, counseling and support services for students; supplemental staff training, classroom and library materials and technological services; and shall the appropriations limit be increased by the amount of the special tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8267, "no_votes": 2473, "total_votes": 10740, "percent_yes": 77.0, "percent_no": 23.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2003-11-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.982134", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.759052", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Davis School District renew its special tax for four years at the annual rate of $82.95 per dwelling for multi-dwelling parcels and $165.90 per parcel for other parcels, to provide enhanced reading programs, increased instructional programs, reduced class size at selected grades; additional nursing, counseling and support services for students; supplemental staff training, classroom and library materials and technological services; and shall the appropriations limit be increased by the amount of the special tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11903, "fingerprint": "2002|200200231|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200231|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2f9771407edc6347", "measure_id": "200200231", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Alameda Adopt a Hotel and Lodging Tax at the rate of 10% of the rental charge to apply in unincorporated areas of the County but not to apply in cities within the County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 166039, "no_votes": 141632, "total_votes": 307671, "percent_yes": 53.96641217404306, "percent_no": 46.03358782595694, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.924293", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.985632", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.761139", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Alameda Adopt a Hotel and Lodging Tax at the rate of 10% of the rental charge to apply in unincorporated areas of the County but not to apply in cities within the County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9019, "fingerprint": "2002|200200115|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200115|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b6c10e113872f26f", "measure_id": "200200115", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Ohlone College Renovation and Improvement Measure.  To allow Ohlone College to increase educational opportunities, raise student achievement, improve health/safety conditions; acquire, construct, equip an Ohlone Newark Center/site for academic, technology/nursing buildings, upgrade and equip computer labs, libraries, science labs, and classrooms; shall Fremont-Newark Community College District issue $150,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, require annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16111, "no_votes": 12506, "total_votes": 28617, "percent_yes": 56.29870356780935, "percent_no": 43.70129643219065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.985334", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.760954", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Ohlone College Renovation and Improvement Measure.  To allow Ohlone College to increase educational opportunities, raise student achievement, improve health/safety conditions; acquire, construct, equip an Ohlone Newark Center/site for academic, technology/nursing buildings, upgrade and equip computer labs, libraries, science labs, and classrooms; shall Fremont-Newark Community College District issue $150,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, require annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11904, "fingerprint": "2002|200200232|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200232|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "26fa969c495f1f2c", "measure_id": "200200232", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Alameda continue to maintain a Business License Tax to apply in unincorporated areas of the County but not to apply in cities within Alameda County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 194595, "no_votes": 103488, "total_votes": 298083, "percent_yes": 65.28215295739777, "percent_no": 34.71784704260223, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.924577", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.986029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.761319", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Alameda continue to maintain a Business License Tax to apply in unincorporated areas of the County but not to apply in cities within Alameda County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9018, "fingerprint": "2002|200200114|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200114|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "cc625feaf1785796", "measure_id": "200200114", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Health and Safety Schools Measure.  To enhance student safety by repairing leaky roofs, reducing earthquake hazards, installing fire safety, emergency communication and air quality systems, upgrading electrical wiring and bathroom plumbing systems; construct/acquire/equip classrooms/cafeterias/facilities; renovate existing schools; qualify for State matching funds, shall Fremont Unified School District issue $157,200,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint a Citizen Oversight Committee to perform annual audits, prevent waste and ensure that no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15101, "no_votes": 8679, "total_votes": 23780, "percent_yes": 63.50294365012616, "percent_no": 36.49705634987384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.985027", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.760767", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Health and Safety Schools Measure.  To enhance student safety by repairing leaky roofs, reducing earthquake hazards, installing fire safety, emergency communication and air quality systems, upgrading electrical wiring and bathroom plumbing systems; construct/acquire/equip classrooms/cafeterias/facilities; renovate existing schools; qualify for State matching funds, shall Fremont Unified School District issue $157,200,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint a Citizen Oversight Committee to perform annual audits, prevent waste and ensure that no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11905, "fingerprint": "2002|200200233|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200233|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "aa94bf574d6e6242", "measure_id": "200200233", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Section 18 of the Charter of the County of Alameda be amended by adding language specifying that any County Probation Officer taking office after November 6, 2002, shall be appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the County Board of Supervisors, and by deleting current language under which the Probation Officer is appointed by the County Juvenile Justice Commission and a majority of the judges and serves at the pleasure of the judges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 167877, "no_votes": 113098, "total_votes": 280975, "percent_yes": 59.74802028650236, "percent_no": 40.25197971349764, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.924856", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.986300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.761496", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 18 of the Charter of the County of Alameda be amended by adding language specifying that any County Probation Officer taking office after November 6, 2002, shall be appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the County Board of Supervisors, and by deleting current language under which the Probation Officer is appointed by the County Juvenile Justice Commission and a majority of the judges and serves at the pleasure of the judges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9017, "fingerprint": "2002|200200113|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200113|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9710d650ecb4c132", "measure_id": "200200113", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete the renovation, modernization and expansion of its schools, including replacement of aging roofs, inefficient heating, energy, and ventilation systems, windows, plumbing and restrooms, to create a performing arts center to serve all students and the community, a science center at each elementary school, and restore fields and reconfigure dropoff areas to improve student safety, shall the Castro Valley Unified School District issue $16,800,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6861, "no_votes": 2975, "total_votes": 9836, "percent_yes": 69.7539650264335, "percent_no": 30.246034973566495, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.984730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.760543", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete the renovation, modernization and expansion of its schools, including replacement of aging roofs, inefficient heating, energy, and ventilation systems, windows, plumbing and restrooms, to create a performing arts center to serve all students and the community, a science center at each elementary school, and restore fields and reconfigure dropoff areas to improve student safety, shall the Castro Valley Unified School District issue $16,800,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9031, "fingerprint": "2002|200200314|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200314|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d0846bb5e28e80ae", "measure_id": "200200314", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland City Charter be amended to specify the date Mayor's term commences following election to fill a mayoral vacancy; provide that no person shall be elected Mayor more than twice, except to fill a mayoral vacancy of two years or less; eliminate Measure X's sunset provision (Charter section 1213), thereby permanently retaining Measure X, which provides for a \"strong mayor\", elected city attorney and requires voter approval of salary increases?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41196, "no_votes": 41613, "total_votes": 82809, "percent_yes": 49.74821577364779, "percent_no": 50.25178422635221, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.992047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.764970", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland City Charter be amended to specify the date Mayor's term commences following election to fill a mayoral vacancy; provide that no person shall be elected Mayor more than twice, except to fill a mayoral vacancy of two years or less; eliminate Measure X's sunset provision (Charter section 1213), thereby permanently retaining Measure X, which provides for a \"strong mayor\", elected city attorney and requires voter approval of salary increases?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11906, "fingerprint": "2002|200200296|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200296|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2946e719cb7131f9", "measure_id": "200200296", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be enacted suspending the effective date of Measure E on this ballot until the voters at a future election authorize funding to pay for the private property affected by Measure E, if the City is required by a court to compensate the owner for that property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9327, "no_votes": 8575, "total_votes": 17902, "percent_yes": 52.100323986146805, "percent_no": 47.899676013853195, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.925129", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.986596", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.761684", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be enacted suspending the effective date of Measure E on this ballot until the voters at a future election authorize funding to pay for the private property affected by Measure E, if the City is required by a court to compensate the owner for that property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9010, "fingerprint": "2002|200200033|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200033|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1b9a8e69655a653c", "measure_id": "200200033", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Oakland City Charter Section 205, which requires elections to fill Council vacancies, be amended to provide that the Vice Mayor of the Council shall not be required to run for his/her Council seat and shall be entitled to return to his/her office by virtue of his/her assumption of the office of Mayor due to a mayoral vacancy?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35621, "no_votes": 17476, "total_votes": 53097, "percent_yes": 67.08665272990942, "percent_no": 32.91334727009058, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.982525", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.759231", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Oakland City Charter Section 205, which requires elections to fill Council vacancies, be amended to provide that the Vice Mayor of the Council shall not be required to run for his/her Council seat and shall be entitled to return to his/her office by virtue of his/her assumption of the office of Mayor due to a mayoral vacancy?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9032, "fingerprint": "2002|200200315|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200315|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fe78087486315a07", "measure_id": "200200315", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve water quality; provide educational and recreational facilities for children; clean up Lake Merritt; restore Oakland's creeks, waterfront and Estuary; preserve and acquire open space; renovate parks; provide safe public spaces; and provide matching funds to qualify for state and federal funding for these projects, shall the City of Oakland issue $198,250,000 in bonds creating an Oakland Trust for Clean Water, Safe Parks to ensure money will be spent only on approved projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 70691, "no_votes": 17613, "total_votes": 88304, "percent_yes": 80.05413118318536, "percent_no": 19.945868816814638, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.992338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.765150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve water quality; provide educational and recreational facilities for children; clean up Lake Merritt; restore Oakland's creeks, waterfront and Estuary; preserve and acquire open space; renovate parks; provide safe public spaces; and provide matching funds to qualify for state and federal funding for these projects, shall the City of Oakland issue $198,250,000 in bonds creating an Oakland Trust for Clean Water, Safe Parks to ensure money will be spent only on approved projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11907, "fingerprint": "2002|200200297|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200297|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a9fb53a6645eea96", "measure_id": "200200297", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the General Plan by changing the land use designation of the Alameda Beltline Railroad Yard Property bound by Marina Village Business Park, Constitution Way and Sherman Street from Medium-Density Residential, General Industry and Parks & Public Open Space to Parks and Public Open Space and making conforming amendments to specified sections and tables in the General Plan and to the Zoning Map provided by the Alameda City Zoning Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9849, "no_votes": 8619, "total_votes": 18468, "percent_yes": 53.33008447043535, "percent_no": 46.66991552956465, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.925423", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.986903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.761863", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the General Plan by changing the land use designation of the Alameda Beltline Railroad Yard Property bound by Marina Village Business Park, Constitution Way and Sherman Street from Medium-Density Residential, General Industry and Parks & Public Open Space to Parks and Public Open Space and making conforming amendments to specified sections and tables in the General Plan and to the Zoning Map provided by the Alameda City Zoning Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9011, "fingerprint": "2002|200200034|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200034|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2012bb00e279aaa2", "measure_id": "200200034", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to specify the qualifications, terms, and powers of the office of the elected City attorney, to provide for the filling of vacancy of the office of the elected City Attorney and, to provide that, if the voters decide not to retain the changes related to Measure X, the City Attorney elected in 2004 will serve a full four-year term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35510, "no_votes": 14564, "total_votes": 50074, "percent_yes": 70.91504573231617, "percent_no": 29.084954267683827, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.982937", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.759418", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to specify the qualifications, terms, and powers of the office of the elected City attorney, to provide for the filling of vacancy of the office of the elected City Attorney and, to provide that, if the voters decide not to retain the changes related to Measure X, the City Attorney elected in 2004 will serve a full four-year term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9033, "fingerprint": "2002|200200316|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200316|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f167e033be8bd76d", "measure_id": "200200316", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that provides that landlords of specified residential properties may evict a tenant only for reasons specified in the measure, such as non-payment of rent, breach of lease, damaging premises, disorderly conduct, drug or other illegal activity, rehabilitation of unit, landlord or relative occupancy, except in certain circumstances where the tenant is disabled, elderly or catastrophically ill, and provides for damages, penalties and attorneys' fees against landlords who violate this law.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45362, "no_votes": 43820, "total_votes": 89182, "percent_yes": 50.86452423134713, "percent_no": 49.13547576865287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.992729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.765335", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that provides that landlords of specified residential properties may evict a tenant only for reasons specified in the measure, such as non-payment of rent, breach of lease, damaging premises, disorderly conduct, drug or other illegal activity, rehabilitation of unit, landlord or relative occupancy, except in certain circumstances where the tenant is disabled, elderly or catastrophically ill, and provides for damages, penalties and attorneys' fees against landlords who violate this law.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11908, "fingerprint": "2002|200200298|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200298|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f6ba351045af2413", "measure_id": "200200298", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to repair and improve recreational facilities; prepare Fire, Police and other City services and buildings for earthquakes and other disasters through retrofit or replacement; improve traffic safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists; create new parks and improve existing parks; and resurface city streets; shall the City of Albany issue $14.5 million of bonds at tax-exempt rates, subject to guaranteed annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3657, "no_votes": 1611, "total_votes": 5268, "percent_yes": 69.41913439635535, "percent_no": 30.580865603644654, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.925711", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.987174", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.762043", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to repair and improve recreational facilities; prepare Fire, Police and other City services and buildings for earthquakes and other disasters through retrofit or replacement; improve traffic safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists; create new parks and improve existing parks; and resurface city streets; shall the City of Albany issue $14.5 million of bonds at tax-exempt rates, subject to guaranteed annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9012, "fingerprint": "2002|200200035|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200035|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "162a3365bcc58455", "measure_id": "200200035", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the salaries of Oakland City Council members be increased ten (10) percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21525, "no_votes": 34236, "total_votes": 55761, "percent_yes": 38.602248883628334, "percent_no": 61.397751116371666, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.983215", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.759601", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the salaries of Oakland City Council members be increased ten (10) percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9034, "fingerprint": "2002|200200317|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200317|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0daa3fc759a74be4", "measure_id": "200200317", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall all new revenues received from Ballot Measures GG, HH, and II be spent on violence prevention programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42525, "no_votes": 37821, "total_votes": 80346, "percent_yes": 52.9273392577104, "percent_no": 47.0726607422896, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.993020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.765515", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall all new revenues received from Ballot Measures GG, HH, and II be spent on violence prevention programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11909, "fingerprint": "2002|200200299|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200299|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5e680445d201a419", "measure_id": "200200299", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Emergency Medical Services Program Ordinance be amended to provide for an increase in the tax rate not to exceed $57.53 per residential unit, with limited authority to adjust for inflation, and an adjustment to the appropriations limit, to read as is set forth in the Voter Pamphlet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3435, "no_votes": 1685, "total_votes": 5120, "percent_yes": 67.08984375, "percent_no": 32.91015625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.926083", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.987477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.762235", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Emergency Medical Services Program Ordinance be amended to provide for an increase in the tax rate not to exceed $57.53 per residential unit, with limited authority to adjust for inflation, and an adjustment to the appropriations limit, to read as is set forth in the Voter Pamphlet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9013, "fingerprint": "2002|200200036|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200036|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "cf354dbc093747f6", "measure_id": "200200036", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) In order to expand learning opportunities at the Oakland Zoo, Oakland Museum and Oakland's Chabot Space and Science Center, shall the City of Oakland issue $59,000,000 in general obligation bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, renovate, improve, construct, and finance existing and additional facilities and to qualify for private matching funds, with all funds raised by this measure staying in Oakland to expand programs and facilities at these institutions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43431, "no_votes": 14386, "total_votes": 57817, "percent_yes": 75.11804486569694, "percent_no": 24.881955134303055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.983483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.759815", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) In order to expand learning opportunities at the Oakland Zoo, Oakland Museum and Oakland's Chabot Space and Science Center, shall the City of Oakland issue $59,000,000 in general obligation bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, renovate, improve, construct, and finance existing and additional facilities and to qualify for private matching funds, with all funds raised by this measure staying in Oakland to expand programs and facilities at these institutions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9035, "fingerprint": "2002|200200318|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200318|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "541b1e92877b6ba0", "measure_id": "200200318", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended in order to provide for a ten percent (10%) temporary (five year) surcharge to the City's parking tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35984, "no_votes": 46301, "total_votes": 82285, "percent_yes": 43.73093516436774, "percent_no": 56.26906483563226, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.993338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.765699", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended in order to provide for a ten percent (10%) temporary (five year) surcharge to the City's parking tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11910, "fingerprint": "2002|200200300|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200300|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "08711644a07898a7", "measure_id": "200200300", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Albany Municipal Code, Chapter 4-5 entitled \"Real Property Transfer Tax\" be amended to provide for an increase in the tax rate and to clarify when business entities that transfer shares or interests in the company are obligated to pay the tax, to read as is set forth in the Voter Pamphlet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2824, "no_votes": 2029, "total_votes": 4853, "percent_yes": 58.19080980836596, "percent_no": 41.80919019163404, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.926377", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.987805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.762419", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Albany Municipal Code, Chapter 4-5 entitled \"Real Property Transfer Tax\" be amended to provide for an increase in the tax rate and to clarify when business entities that transfer shares or interests in the company are obligated to pay the tax, to read as is set forth in the Voter Pamphlet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9014, "fingerprint": "2002|200200037|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200037|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "786ccf060eb15187", "measure_id": "200200037", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide: (1) elections to fill any vacancy of one year or more in the Office of Mayor, (2) that the Vice-Mayor of the Council shall fill any vacancy of less than one year; and (3) that the Council shall appoint an individual to fill a vacancy of less than one year if the Vice-Mayor declines to serve for such unexpired term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40114, "no_votes": 12713, "total_votes": 52827, "percent_yes": 75.93465462736859, "percent_no": 24.065345372631413, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.983811", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.760002", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide: (1) elections to fill any vacancy of one year or more in the Office of Mayor, (2) that the Vice-Mayor of the Council shall fill any vacancy of less than one year; and (3) that the Council shall appoint an individual to fill a vacancy of less than one year if the Vice-Mayor declines to serve for such unexpired term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9036, "fingerprint": "2002|200200319|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200319|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "cf2f175de2f81e24", "measure_id": "200200319", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended in order to provide for a one-half of one percent (1/2%) temporary (five year) surcharge to the City's alternate fuel, cable, electricity, gas and telephone users tax rates and to impose the telephone users tax on all calls regardless of the origination or termination of the call, and regardless of whether the call in included within a \"package\" or is billed as a separately listed call?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27184, "no_votes": 54996, "total_votes": 82180, "percent_yes": 33.07860793380384, "percent_no": 66.92139206619616, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.993674", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.765880", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended in order to provide for a one-half of one percent (1/2%) temporary (five year) surcharge to the City's alternate fuel, cable, electricity, gas and telephone users tax rates and to impose the telephone users tax on all calls regardless of the origination or termination of the call, and regardless of whether the call in included within a \"package\" or is billed as a separately listed call?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11911, "fingerprint": "2002|200200301|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200301|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ea5f98eac1d0e551", "measure_id": "200200301", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Berkeley be authorized to issue $7.2 million of General Obligation Bonds to acquire property, if necessary, and to construct or rehabilitate a building for an animal shelter which meets the requirements of state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25200, "no_votes": 11710, "total_votes": 36910, "percent_yes": 68.27418043890545, "percent_no": 31.725819561094553, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.926735", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.988123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.762598", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Berkeley be authorized to issue $7.2 million of General Obligation Bonds to acquire property, if necessary, and to construct or rehabilitate a building for an animal shelter which meets the requirements of state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9015, "fingerprint": "2002|200200038|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200038|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b3c86e175981cfdb", "measure_id": "200200038", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to: reduce certain Port of Oakland contractors and tenants with over 20 employees and contracts/leases with the Port over $50,000 to: Pay employees at least what Oakland's Living Wage Ordinance requires (currently $9.13 per hour with health benefits; $10.50 without benefits); and if replacing a previous contractor/tenant, retain the prior employer's non-management employees for at least 90 days unless there is cause for discharge or layoff?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44543, "no_votes": 12701, "total_votes": 57244, "percent_yes": 77.81252183634966, "percent_no": 22.18747816365034, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.984078", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.760181", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to: reduce certain Port of Oakland contractors and tenants with over 20 employees and contracts/leases with the Port over $50,000 to: Pay employees at least what Oakland's Living Wage Ordinance requires (currently $9.13 per hour with health benefits; $10.50 without benefits); and if replacing a previous contractor/tenant, retain the prior employer's non-management employees for at least 90 days unless there is cause for discharge or layoff?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9037, "fingerprint": "2002|200200320|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200320|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7eea8b3e9ea08581", "measure_id": "200200320", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended in order to provide for a three percent (3%) temporary (five year) surcharge to the City's transient occupancy tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34733, "no_votes": 45299, "total_votes": 80032, "percent_yes": 43.39889044382247, "percent_no": 56.60110955617753, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.993943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.766063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended in order to provide for a three percent (3%) temporary (five year) surcharge to the City's transient occupancy tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11912, "fingerprint": "2002|200200302|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200302|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "75a079dc6deac7e1", "measure_id": "200200302", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Berkeley be authorized to issue $21.5 million of General Obligation Bonds to renovate, seismically retrofit, Old City Hall (2134 Martin Luther King, Jr. Way), and make it fully accessible using a base isolation design?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14094, "no_votes": 21450, "total_votes": 35544, "percent_yes": 39.65226198514517, "percent_no": 60.34773801485483, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.926989", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.988449", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.762783", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Berkeley be authorized to issue $21.5 million of General Obligation Bonds to renovate, seismically retrofit, Old City Hall (2134 Martin Luther King, Jr. Way), and make it fully accessible using a base isolation design?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9016, "fingerprint": "2002|200200039|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200039|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1cff56c36112462f", "measure_id": "200200039", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 570-01 Repealing the sale, use or possession of safe and sane fireworks be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3085, "no_votes": 3795, "total_votes": 6880, "percent_yes": 44.84011627906977, "percent_no": 55.15988372093023, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.984411", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.760364", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 570-01 Repealing the sale, use or possession of safe and sane fireworks be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9038, "fingerprint": "2002|200200321|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200321|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ec0a1e0d7d46d88f", "measure_id": "200200321", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to Ensure that businesses, regardless of location, are subject to equal business tax treatment by 1) Reducing eligible manufacturers' tax liability by providing a raw materials' deduction, 2)  Clarifying Oakland manufacturers' right to an additional tax deduction for business activity occurring outside of Oakland, 3)  Clarifying that business category for each business activity at the headquarters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50427, "no_votes": 26147, "total_votes": 76574, "percent_yes": 65.85394520333271, "percent_no": 34.146054796667286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.994250", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.766241", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to Ensure that businesses, regardless of location, are subject to equal business tax treatment by 1) Reducing eligible manufacturers' tax liability by providing a raw materials' deduction, 2)  Clarifying Oakland manufacturers' right to an additional tax deduction for business activity occurring outside of Oakland, 3)  Clarifying that business category for each business activity at the headquarters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9020, "fingerprint": "2002|200200303|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200303|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b54900cea1c77ee7", "measure_id": "200200303", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to increase the compensation of school board director from $875 to $1500 per month effective December 2002 to be adjusted for inflation and allow for such remuneration to be used for official expenses by a voluntary reduction of remuneration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24081, "no_votes": 11872, "total_votes": 35953, "percent_yes": 66.97911161794565, "percent_no": 33.02088838205435, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.988760", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.762961", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to increase the compensation of school board director from $875 to $1500 per month effective December 2002 to be adjusted for inflation and allow for such remuneration to be used for official expenses by a voluntary reduction of remuneration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9021, "fingerprint": "2002|200200304|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200304|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8191ac3b5b953691", "measure_id": "200200304", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special tax of 1.3 cents per square foot of improvements on land in Berkeley be authorized to provide funding for the installation and maintenance in the City of Berkeley of innovative and enhanced pedestrian safety improvements such as traffic circles and lighted pedestrian crosswalks and improved access for people with disabilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19735, "no_votes": 16885, "total_votes": 36620, "percent_yes": 53.891316220644455, "percent_no": 46.108683779355545, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.989035", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.763144", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax of 1.3 cents per square foot of improvements on land in Berkeley be authorized to provide funding for the installation and maintenance in the City of Berkeley of innovative and enhanced pedestrian safety improvements such as traffic circles and lighted pedestrian crosswalks and improved access for people with disabilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9022, "fingerprint": "2002|200200305|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200305|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7b1c0c02bc18255a", "measure_id": "200200305", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a tax of 0.5% on all transfers of real property be authorized to fund safe and affordable housing for people living or working in Berkeley, exempting owner-occupied single family homes sold at up to $350,000 or 105% of prior price?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18834, "no_votes": 18257, "total_votes": 37091, "percent_yes": 50.77781672103745, "percent_no": 49.22218327896255, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.989393", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.763327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a tax of 0.5% on all transfers of real property be authorized to fund safe and affordable housing for people living or working in Berkeley, exempting owner-occupied single family homes sold at up to $350,000 or 105% of prior price?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9023, "fingerprint": "2002|200200306|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200306|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c9a8fd9bf0d527bf", "measure_id": "200200306", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure Q be amended to authorize the Berkeley City Council to amend the Waterfront Specific Plan to change the amount and type of potential development on privately-owned property at the Berkeley Waterfront, so long as: development potential is not increased; any amendments are evaluated under the California Environmental Quality Act; any amendments ensure that the property owner's constitutional rights are respected; and any amendments are submitted to the voters at the next regular election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23193, "no_votes": 11308, "total_votes": 34501, "percent_yes": 67.22413843077013, "percent_no": 32.775861569229875, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.989667", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.763507", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure Q be amended to authorize the Berkeley City Council to amend the Waterfront Specific Plan to change the amount and type of potential development on privately-owned property at the Berkeley Waterfront, so long as: development potential is not increased; any amendments are evaluated under the California Environmental Quality Act; any amendments ensure that the property owner's constitutional rights are respected; and any amendments are submitted to the voters at the next regular election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9024, "fingerprint": "2002|200200307|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200307|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0b4a44977fc53d5a", "measure_id": "200200307", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to restrict the sale of brewed coffee in Berkeley to only that which is organic, shade-grown and fair-trade certified coffee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11172, "no_votes": 26712, "total_votes": 37884, "percent_yes": 29.490022172949, "percent_no": 70.509977827051, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.989981", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.763693", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to restrict the sale of brewed coffee in Berkeley to only that which is organic, shade-grown and fair-trade certified coffee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9025, "fingerprint": "2002|200200308|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200308|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fe0e2ff6298d9ee7", "measure_id": "200200308", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Zoning Ordinance be amended to reduce certain height limits; require certain height increases to be approved by the Zoning Adjustments Board; limit height increases to comply with state law mandates for affordable housing projects to ten feet where no feasible alternative exists and allow amendments to the initiative after ten years or upon a two-thirds vote of the City Council and written findings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7508, "no_votes": 29495, "total_votes": 37003, "percent_yes": 20.29024673675107, "percent_no": 79.70975326324893, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.990280", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.763875", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Zoning Ordinance be amended to reduce certain height limits; require certain height increases to be approved by the Zoning Adjustments Board; limit height increases to comply with state law mandates for affordable housing projects to ten feet where no feasible alternative exists and allow amendments to the initiative after ten years or upon a two-thirds vote of the City Council and written findings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9026, "fingerprint": "2002|200200309|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200309|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "94a747bd8cd632c9", "measure_id": "200200309", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the resolution adopted on May 9, 2002 by the Alameda Local Formation Commission ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the resolution and designated as the Incorporation of the City of Castro Valley, subject to terms and conditions specified in the resolution, including authorizing the City to levy a Transient Occupancy Tax of 10% and extending the existing Utility Users Tax beyond its current sunset date of June 2009, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5417, "no_votes": 13976, "total_votes": 19393, "percent_yes": 27.932759243025828, "percent_no": 72.06724075697417, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.990552", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.764058", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the resolution adopted on May 9, 2002 by the Alameda Local Formation Commission ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the resolution and designated as the Incorporation of the City of Castro Valley, subject to terms and conditions specified in the resolution, including authorizing the City to levy a Transient Occupancy Tax of 10% and extending the existing Utility Users Tax beyond its current sunset date of June 2009, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9027, "fingerprint": "2002|200200310|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200310|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ae252af97ac6d940", "measure_id": "200200310", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve Fremont's fire safety and emergency response capability by replacing three small, substandard fire stations; strengthening the remaining seven fire stations to better withstand earthquakes and serve the community after an emergency; and building a public safety training center, shall the City of Fremont issue $51 million in general obligation bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, with the moneys deposited in a special account to be used only for these projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28603, "no_votes": 9856, "total_votes": 38459, "percent_yes": 74.37270859876752, "percent_no": 25.627291401232483, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.990877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.764238", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Fremont's fire safety and emergency response capability by replacing three small, substandard fire stations; strengthening the remaining seven fire stations to better withstand earthquakes and serve the community after an emergency; and building a public safety training center, shall the City of Fremont issue $51 million in general obligation bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, with the moneys deposited in a special account to be used only for these projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9028, "fingerprint": "2002|200200311|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200311|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d916737fc83479e3", "measure_id": "200200311", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that increases the salary of each member of the City Council from $1,407 per month to $2,083 per month and increases the salary of the Mayor from $2,211 per month to $2,916 per month?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13215, "no_votes": 24298, "total_votes": 37513, "percent_yes": 35.22778770026391, "percent_no": 64.77221229973608, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.991150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.764423", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that increases the salary of each member of the City Council from $1,407 per month to $2,083 per month and increases the salary of the Mayor from $2,211 per month to $2,916 per month?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9029, "fingerprint": "2002|200200312|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200312|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7e08da171af48eda", "measure_id": "200200312", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the City of Fremont adopt the Hill Area Initiative of 2002?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21749, "no_votes": 16012, "total_votes": 37761, "percent_yes": 57.596461958104925, "percent_no": 42.403538041895075, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.991415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.764606", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the City of Fremont adopt the Hill Area Initiative of 2002?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9030, "fingerprint": "2002|200200313|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200313|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "31c856f21488b0ba", "measure_id": "200200313", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Hayward be amended, as provided in the measure, to enable the Hayward City Council to pursue implementation of transportation projects which may include alternatives to the Route 238 Bypass and which would qualify for funding from Measure B and other sources?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11423, "no_votes": 7143, "total_votes": 18566, "percent_yes": 61.5264461919638, "percent_no": 38.4735538080362, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.991712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.764788", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Hayward be amended, as provided in the measure, to enable the Hayward City Council to pursue implementation of transportation projects which may include alternatives to the Route 238 Bypass and which would qualify for funding from Measure B and other sources?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9039, "fingerprint": "2002|200200322|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200322|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e8f1b121829c72f0", "measure_id": "200200322", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Bernal Property Initiative, which would (1) prohibit housing of any type on the city owned land within the Bernal Specific Plan area, (b) prohibit the city from selling any of the land, and (c) mandate that all uses on the city owned land be accessible to the public, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11580, "no_votes": 7578, "total_votes": 19158, "percent_yes": 60.44472283119323, "percent_no": 39.55527716880677, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.994546", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.766423", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bernal Property Initiative, which would (1) prohibit housing of any type on the city owned land within the Bernal Specific Plan area, (b) prohibit the city from selling any of the land, and (c) mandate that all uses on the city owned land be accessible to the public, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9040, "fingerprint": "2002|200200523|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200523|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "42e979e0aa6d7f7c", "measure_id": "200200523", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide modern, safe learning environments for high school students by constructing a new Tracy High; adding physical education facilities, stadium and auditorium to West High; renovating essential classrooms/bathrooms/core facilities for career-technical education and community uses at existing Tracy High and Qualifying for state matching funds for these projects; and for other specified projects; shall Tracy Joint Unified School District issue $103,000,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with annual audits, and a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34, "no_votes": 33, "total_votes": 67, "percent_yes": 50.74626865671642, "percent_no": 49.25373134328358, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.994907", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.766605", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide modern, safe learning environments for high school students by constructing a new Tracy High; adding physical education facilities, stadium and auditorium to West High; renovating essential classrooms/bathrooms/core facilities for career-technical education and community uses at existing Tracy High and Qualifying for state matching funds for these projects; and for other specified projects; shall Tracy Joint Unified School District issue $103,000,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with annual audits, and a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9041, "fingerprint": "2002|200200040|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200040|AMADOR", "content_hash": "b921e9df33280e3e", "measure_id": "200200040", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Sutter Creek increase the rate charged for Transient Occupancy Tax be increased from 7 1//4% to 10 percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 417, "no_votes": 328, "total_votes": 745, "percent_yes": 55.97315436241611, "percent_no": 44.02684563758389, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.995287", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.766791", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Sutter Creek increase the rate charged for Transient Occupancy Tax be increased from 7 1//4% to 10 percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9042, "fingerprint": "2002|200200234|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200234|AMADOR", "content_hash": "6c95acebae0c9f3b", "measure_id": "200200234", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance establishing a comprehensive rent control program for manufactured (mobile) home parks in the unincorporated portion of Amador County be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4321, "no_votes": 8261, "total_votes": 12582, "percent_yes": 34.34271181052297, "percent_no": 65.65728818947703, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.995580", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.766973", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance establishing a comprehensive rent control program for manufactured (mobile) home parks in the unincorporated portion of Amador County be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9043, "fingerprint": "2002|200200323|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200323|AMADOR", "content_hash": "38ec89cc5d3cde30", "measure_id": "200200323", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council of the City of Jackson Be Authorized to Impose, by Ordinance, a Tax of Ten Percent (10%) Upon the Occupancy of Transient Lodging Establishments Within the City and Make Any Other Required Municipal Code Amendments to Carry Out the Intent of the Voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 704, "no_votes": 684, "total_votes": 1388, "percent_yes": 50.72046109510087, "percent_no": 49.27953890489913, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.995873", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.767150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council of the City of Jackson Be Authorized to Impose, by Ordinance, a Tax of Ten Percent (10%) Upon the Occupancy of Transient Lodging Establishments Within the City and Make Any Other Required Municipal Code Amendments to Carry Out the Intent of the Voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9044, "fingerprint": "2002|200200524|AMADOR|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200524|AMADOR", "content_hash": "72b2d2e22720e442", "measure_id": "200200524", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Amador", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Amador County Unified School District issue $11 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and appoint an independent oversight committee to monitor all expenditures, with no funds for administrator or teacher salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8332, "no_votes": 4420, "total_votes": 12752, "percent_yes": 65.3387703889586, "percent_no": 34.661229611041406, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.996163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.767329", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Amador County Unified School District issue $11 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and appoint an independent oversight committee to monitor all expenditures, with no funds for administrator or teacher salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Amador_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9046, "fingerprint": "2002|200200116|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200116|BUTTE", "content_hash": "5a72cebea94f864c", "measure_id": "200200116", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND. To prepare students for law enforcement, firefighting, nursing, farming and business jobs and four year colleges shall Butte College construct, repair/equip classrooms, libraries, science/computer labs and facilities; upgrade energy conservation, lighting, electrical, ventilation, and plumbing systems; qualify for State matching funds by Butte-Glenn Community College District issuing $84,900,000 of bonds, at legal rates, appointing a Citizen Oversight committee to perform annual audits and ensuring that no bond money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33055, "no_votes": 16673, "total_votes": 49728, "percent_yes": 66.47160553410554, "percent_no": 33.528394465894465, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.997072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.767757", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND. To prepare students for law enforcement, firefighting, nursing, farming and business jobs and four year colleges shall Butte College construct, repair/equip classrooms, libraries, science/computer labs and facilities; upgrade energy conservation, lighting, electrical, ventilation, and plumbing systems; qualify for State matching funds by Butte-Glenn Community College District issuing $84,900,000 of bonds, at legal rates, appointing a Citizen Oversight committee to perform annual audits and ensuring that no bond money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9045, "fingerprint": "2002|200200002|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200002|BUTTE", "content_hash": "434d9f3d77cd7371", "measure_id": "200200002", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "REDISTRICTING ORDINANCE REFERENDUM MEASURE B. Shall Ordinance No. 3759, establishing new boundaries for supervisorial districts in Butte County, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19817, "no_votes": 29256, "total_votes": 49073, "percent_yes": 40.38269516842255, "percent_no": 59.61730483157745, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.996481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.767510", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "REDISTRICTING ORDINANCE REFERENDUM MEASURE B. Shall Ordinance No. 3759, establishing new boundaries for supervisorial districts in Butte County, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9047, "fingerprint": "2002|200200117|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200117|BUTTE", "content_hash": "abdebf65be13d3e7", "measure_id": "200200117", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "SCHOOL FACILITIES AUTHORIZATION. Shall Paradise Unified School District, maintain the current tax rate and use a portion of such rate (five cents per $100 assessed valuation, authorized on November 5, 1974) exclusively to construct and lease purchase new multi-purpose room/gym at Paradise Intermediate School, a new gym at Paradise High School, and to acquire a site for a future high school?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9024, "no_votes": 2947, "total_votes": 11971, "percent_yes": 75.38217358616657, "percent_no": 24.617826413833427, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.997544", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.767972", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SCHOOL FACILITIES AUTHORIZATION. Shall Paradise Unified School District, maintain the current tax rate and use a portion of such rate (five cents per $100 assessed valuation, authorized on November 5, 1974) exclusively to construct and lease purchase new multi-purpose room/gym at Paradise Intermediate School, a new gym at Paradise High School, and to acquire a site for a future high school?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9051, "fingerprint": "2002|200200525|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200525|BUTTE", "content_hash": "4dd8984fc117e688", "measure_id": "200200525", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "OROVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OF 2002. In order to construct a new middle school on property already owned by the school district, consisting of approximately ten classrooms, multipurpose room, gymnasium, kitchen, library, administrative support building and for related purposes specified in the District's Bond Project List, shall the Oroville City Elementary School District issue $6,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4742, "no_votes": 2783, "total_votes": 7525, "percent_yes": 63.01661129568106, "percent_no": 36.98338870431894, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.998822", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.768720", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "OROVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION BOND OF 2002. In order to construct a new middle school on property already owned by the school district, consisting of approximately ten classrooms, multipurpose room, gymnasium, kitchen, library, administrative support building and for related purposes specified in the District's Bond Project List, shall the Oroville City Elementary School District issue $6,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9048, "fingerprint": "2002|200200235|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200235|BUTTE", "content_hash": "65dd72ed74b242fe", "measure_id": "200200235", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "INITIATIVE ORDINANCE REGARDING DESIGNATION OF BUTTE COUNTY'S SHARE OF TOBACCO SETTLEMENT REVENUE FOR SPECIFIED PROGRAMS AND SERVICES. Shall the initiative ordinance regarding \"Designation of Butte County's Share of Tobacco Settlement Revenue for Specified Programs and Services\" be adopted, which ordinance would establish a settlement revenue allocation formula requiring annual Tobacco Settlement revenue to be spent on those programs and services identified in the ordinance, in specified percentages?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22798, "no_votes": 35418, "total_votes": 58216, "percent_yes": 39.161055379964274, "percent_no": 60.838944620035726, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.997859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.768165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "INITIATIVE ORDINANCE REGARDING DESIGNATION OF BUTTE COUNTY'S SHARE OF TOBACCO SETTLEMENT REVENUE FOR SPECIFIED PROGRAMS AND SERVICES. Shall the initiative ordinance regarding \"Designation of Butte County's Share of Tobacco Settlement Revenue for Specified Programs and Services\" be adopted, which ordinance would establish a settlement revenue allocation formula requiring annual Tobacco Settlement revenue to be spent on those programs and services identified in the ordinance, in specified percentages?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9052, "fingerprint": "2002|200200526|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200526|BUTTE", "content_hash": "ba279716c0e7d8af", "measure_id": "200200526", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "OROVILLE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT BOND OF 2002. To construct a library/media center, shop classrooms and 6 permanent classrooms at Oroville High, a gymnasium, Ag Science classrooms, labs and 6 permanent classrooms at Las Plumas High, a multi-purpose building at Prospect High, modernize electrical and communications systems at Oroville, Las Plumas and Prospect High, acquire a school site and construct a portable campus at OUHSD Community Day, and for related purposes, shall Oroville Union High School District issue $10,400,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6809, "no_votes": 4570, "total_votes": 11379, "percent_yes": 59.838298620265405, "percent_no": 40.161701379734595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.999149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.768900", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "OROVILLE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT BOND OF 2002. To construct a library/media center, shop classrooms and 6 permanent classrooms at Oroville High, a gymnasium, Ag Science classrooms, labs and 6 permanent classrooms at Las Plumas High, a multi-purpose building at Prospect High, modernize electrical and communications systems at Oroville, Las Plumas and Prospect High, acquire a school site and construct a portable campus at OUHSD Community Day, and for related purposes, shall Oroville Union High School District issue $10,400,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9050, "fingerprint": "2002|200200324|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200324|BUTTE", "content_hash": "cb860c06313f71ba", "measure_id": "200200324", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 2.46 OF THE PARADISE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARADISE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. Shall the citizen initiative ordinance repealing Chapter 2.46 of the Paradise Municipal Code relating to Paradise Redevelopment Agency be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3020, "no_votes": 6116, "total_votes": 9136, "percent_yes": 33.05604203152364, "percent_no": 66.94395796847635, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.998463", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.768539", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 2.46 OF THE PARADISE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARADISE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. Shall the citizen initiative ordinance repealing Chapter 2.46 of the Paradise Municipal Code relating to Paradise Redevelopment Agency be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9049, "fingerprint": "2002|200200236|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200236|BUTTE", "content_hash": "bad80ea811466a40", "measure_id": "200200236", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "BUTTE COUNTY CHARTER AMENDMENT. Shall the ordinance enacting a charter amendment separating the Offices of County Surveyor and Road Commissioner, be adopted, which ordinance would 1) separate the offices of County Surveyor and Road Commissioner, 2) rename the Road Engineer as the Road Commissioner, and 3) rename the Horticultural Commissioner as Agricultural Commissioner?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27346, "no_votes": 25804, "total_votes": 53150, "percent_yes": 51.45061147695203, "percent_no": 48.54938852304797, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.998165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.768356", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUTTE COUNTY CHARTER AMENDMENT. Shall the ordinance enacting a charter amendment separating the Offices of County Surveyor and Road Commissioner, be adopted, which ordinance would 1) separate the offices of County Surveyor and Road Commissioner, 2) rename the Road Engineer as the Road Commissioner, and 3) rename the Horticultural Commissioner as Agricultural Commissioner?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9053, "fingerprint": "2002|200200118|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200118|COLUSA", "content_hash": "76491389836ba89e", "measure_id": "200200118", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and upgrade existing school, shall Pierce Joint Unified School District: Build a new administration/library building and a new classroom building at Johnson Jr. High;Construct and remodel existing relocatables into a new classroom wing at Johnson Jr. High; Modernize Grand Island Elementary; Add a classroom and modernize or replace the Shop Building at Pierce High; and issue $6 million of bonds for the above purposes, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 529, "no_votes": 376, "total_votes": 905, "percent_yes": 58.45303867403315, "percent_no": 41.54696132596685, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.999429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.769081", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and upgrade existing school, shall Pierce Joint Unified School District: Build a new administration/library building and a new classroom building at Johnson Jr. High;Construct and remodel existing relocatables into a new classroom wing at Johnson Jr. High; Modernize Grand Island Elementary; Add a classroom and modernize or replace the Shop Building at Pierce High; and issue $6 million of bonds for the above purposes, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11919, "fingerprint": "2002|200200528|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200528|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e597418a8065a4e2", "measure_id": "200200528", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, upgrade and expand local schools; provide safe, modern classrooms; relieve overcrowding; replace substandard electrical, heating and cooling systems; add new science and technology labs; replace portable classrooms with permanent classrooms; and to qualify for State matching funds; shall San Ramon Valley Unified School District issue $260 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with a citizens' oversight committee and independent audits to ensure funds are spent only on specified school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23655, "no_votes": 16675, "total_votes": 40330, "percent_yes": 58.65360773617654, "percent_no": 41.34639226382346, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.942534", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.006428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.773255", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, upgrade and expand local schools; provide safe, modern classrooms; relieve overcrowding; replace substandard electrical, heating and cooling systems; add new science and technology labs; replace portable classrooms with permanent classrooms; and to qualify for State matching funds; shall San Ramon Valley Unified School District issue $260 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with a citizens' oversight committee and independent audits to ensure funds are spent only on specified school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9061, "fingerprint": "2002|200200120|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200120|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "773ef6a32fd5183e", "measure_id": "200200120", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Contra Costa Community College District issue $120 million of bonds (its first since 1948)  to repair outmoded facilities (for energy savings, safety, and handicapped accessibility improvements), and update facilities used by vocational programs (for fire science, nursing, police, culinary arts, technology programs, etc.) and transfer programs at Contra Costa Community College, Diablo Valley College, Los Medanos Community College, San Ramon Valley Center and the Brentwood/Delta Science Centers, with a citizens' oversight committee to monitor spending of the funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 112062, "no_votes": 60664, "total_votes": 172726, "percent_yes": 64.87847805194355, "percent_no": 35.121521948056454, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.001796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.770525", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Contra Costa Community College District issue $120 million of bonds (its first since 1948)  to repair outmoded facilities (for energy savings, safety, and handicapped accessibility improvements), and update facilities used by vocational programs (for fire science, nursing, police, culinary arts, technology programs, etc.) and transfer programs at Contra Costa Community College, Diablo Valley College, Los Medanos Community College, San Ramon Valley Center and the Brentwood/Delta Science Centers, with a citizens' oversight committee to monitor spending of the funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11918, "fingerprint": "2002|200200527|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200527|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ee10e1a364a4a6b1", "measure_id": "200200527", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety, energy efficiency, lower maintenance costs at each district high school by replacing aging boilers/heating, ventilation systems, renovating/expanding/constructing/equipping fields, physical education facilities, classrooms and upgrading language labs; shall Acalanes Union High School District issue $44 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform audits to ensure the proper use of bond funds to benefit students and the community without increasing the current tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30163, "no_votes": 14634, "total_votes": 44797, "percent_yes": 67.33263388173314, "percent_no": 32.667366118266855, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.942202", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.006138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.773072", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety, energy efficiency, lower maintenance costs at each district high school by replacing aging boilers/heating, ventilation systems, renovating/expanding/constructing/equipping fields, physical education facilities, classrooms and upgrading language labs; shall Acalanes Union High School District issue $44 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform audits to ensure the proper use of bond funds to benefit students and the community without increasing the current tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9062, "fingerprint": "2002|200200121|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200121|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7a5d839d7dbeae14", "measure_id": "200200121", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build, equip, and furnish a new elementary school on the district-owned site of the former Garretson School in order to replace the substandard Hillcrest Elementary School and provide a more modern, improved, safer, and technologically advanced facility, shall the John Swett Unified School District issue $10 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and thereby become eligible for additional state funding for the project?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1778, "no_votes": 895, "total_votes": 2673, "percent_yes": 66.51702207257763, "percent_no": 33.48297792742237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.002092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.770707", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build, equip, and furnish a new elementary school on the district-owned site of the former Garretson School in order to replace the substandard Hillcrest Elementary School and provide a more modern, improved, safer, and technologically advanced facility, shall the John Swett Unified School District issue $10 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and thereby become eligible for additional state funding for the project?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11920, "fingerprint": "2002|200200529|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200529|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "9d320c280e17c581", "measure_id": "200200529", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve school facilities, including updating safety and security systems, building a new library at the middle school, improving building exteriors and grounds for safety, updating the technology infrastructure and renovating fields, shall the Walnut Creek School District issue $20 million in bonds at rates within the legal limit, and appoint an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11876, "no_votes": 6414, "total_votes": 18290, "percent_yes": 64.9316566429743, "percent_no": 35.0683433570257, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.942827", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.006741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.773436", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve school facilities, including updating safety and security systems, building a new library at the middle school, improving building exteriors and grounds for safety, updating the technology infrastructure and renovating fields, shall the Walnut Creek School District issue $20 million in bonds at rates within the legal limit, and appoint an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9063, "fingerprint": "2002|200200122|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200122|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "11267df0753f3dd6", "measure_id": "200200122", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of local schools, shall Mt. Diablo Unified School District upgrade electrical systems, repair inadequate heating, ventilation and plumbing systems, replace aging portables and construct or acquire new classrooms, educational facilities and technology infrastructure by issuing $250,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing citizens' oversight and independent audits with all funds benefiting our local community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31530, "no_votes": 16582, "total_votes": 48112, "percent_yes": 65.53458596607915, "percent_no": 34.46541403392085, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.002413", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.770886", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of local schools, shall Mt. Diablo Unified School District upgrade electrical systems, repair inadequate heating, ventilation and plumbing systems, replace aging portables and construct or acquire new classrooms, educational facilities and technology infrastructure by issuing $250,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing citizens' oversight and independent audits with all funds benefiting our local community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11914, "fingerprint": "2002|200200325|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200325|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3ff28554fc98c1b1", "measure_id": "200200325", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Brentwood amend the Business License Tax and Regulations, as set forth in Ordinance No. 707?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4216, "no_votes": 2507, "total_votes": 6723, "percent_yes": 62.71009965789083, "percent_no": 37.28990034210917, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.939332", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.003622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.771616", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Brentwood amend the Business License Tax and Regulations, as set forth in Ordinance No. 707?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9065, "fingerprint": "2002|200200124|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200124|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "cd7f4942a603ac1e", "measure_id": "200200124", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete repairing all of our schools, improve classroom safety and relieve overcrowding through such  projects as: building additional classrooms; making seismic upgrades; repairing and renovating bathrooms, electrical, plumbing, heating and ventilation systems, leaking roofs, and fire safety systems; shall the West Contra Costa Unified School District issue $300 million in bonds at authorized interest rates, to renovate, acquire, construct and modernize school facilities, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to monitor that funds are spent accordingly?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24391, "no_votes": 9567, "total_votes": 33958, "percent_yes": 71.82696271865245, "percent_no": 28.173037281347547, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.002955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.771250", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete repairing all of our schools, improve classroom safety and relieve overcrowding through such  projects as: building additional classrooms; making seismic upgrades; repairing and renovating bathrooms, electrical, plumbing, heating and ventilation systems, leaking roofs, and fire safety systems; shall the West Contra Costa Unified School District issue $300 million in bonds at authorized interest rates, to renovate, acquire, construct and modernize school facilities, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to monitor that funds are spent accordingly?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11915, "fingerprint": "2002|200200326|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200326|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6f545acfc86d35cc", "measure_id": "200200326", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a Resolution be adopted which will amend the text of the Clayton General Plan Use Element to add \"service station\" to the list of permitted uses in the Town Center Commercial Land Use Designation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1175, "no_votes": 3697, "total_votes": 4872, "percent_yes": 24.11740558292282, "percent_no": 75.88259441707717, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.939658", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.004000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.771804", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Resolution be adopted which will amend the text of the Clayton General Plan Use Element to add \"service station\" to the list of permitted uses in the Town Center Commercial Land Use Designation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9060, "fingerprint": "2002|200200119|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200119|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "42ac521f12c4842a", "measure_id": "200200119", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete the Byron Unified School District's new middle school by building additional, permanent classrooms, up-to-date science and computer labs, and a library and gymnasium both designed for school and community use, and for other district projects, shall the District issue $10,000,000 in bonds bearing interest at legally authorized rates, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1158, "no_votes": 2654, "total_votes": 3812, "percent_yes": 30.37775445960126, "percent_no": 69.62224554039874, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.001512", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.770347", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete the Byron Unified School District's new middle school by building additional, permanent classrooms, up-to-date science and computer labs, and a library and gymnasium both designed for school and community use, and for other district projects, shall the District issue $10,000,000 in bonds bearing interest at legally authorized rates, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9066, "fingerprint": "2002|200200327|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200327|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3e3ee3259de07cf4", "measure_id": "200200327", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council increase the rate of the transient occupancy tax from 8% of the rent charged to 9 1/2%  for general government services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6117, "no_votes": 3795, "total_votes": 9912, "percent_yes": 61.71307506053269, "percent_no": 38.28692493946731, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.004270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.771983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council increase the rate of the transient occupancy tax from 8% of the rent charged to 9 1/2%  for general government services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11916, "fingerprint": "2002|200200328|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200328|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200200328", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2524, "no_votes": 1879, "total_votes": 4403, "percent_yes": 57.3245514421985, "percent_no": 42.6754485578015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.940222", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.004535", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.772166", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9064, "fingerprint": "2002|200200123|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200123|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "bb3b62af109c7dd7", "measure_id": "200200123", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ensure reliable funding with strong local control to benefit all elementary and intermediate school students through excellent classroom programs, high quality teaching, and small class sizes, shall the Orinda Union School District be authorized to replace its existing instructional parcel tax with a tax beginning at $385/year per taxable parcel and increasing by Board action by a maximum of $25/year, with a six year term starting July 1, 2002?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4857, "no_votes": 2654, "total_votes": 7511, "percent_yes": 64.66515776860604, "percent_no": 35.334842231393964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.002686", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.771065", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ensure reliable funding with strong local control to benefit all elementary and intermediate school students through excellent classroom programs, high quality teaching, and small class sizes, shall the Orinda Union School District be authorized to replace its existing instructional parcel tax with a tax beginning at $385/year per taxable parcel and increasing by Board action by a maximum of $25/year, with a six year term starting July 1, 2002?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9069, "fingerprint": "2002|200200332|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200332|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "9d56d7d00f7958fd", "measure_id": "200200332", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the general municipal election be held on the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November of each even numbered year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6209, "no_votes": 7275, "total_votes": 13484, "percent_yes": 46.04716701275586, "percent_no": 53.95283298724414, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.005837", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.772892", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the general municipal election be held on the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November of each even numbered year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9067, "fingerprint": "2002|200200329|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200329|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "0af5cbd51e5fb1fd", "measure_id": "200200329", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to provide additional funds to help preserve vital City services such as police, fire, emergency medical, library, recreation, local street maintenance and for other general governmental purposes, shall the ordinance to increase the utility users tax from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9549, "no_votes": 7891, "total_votes": 17440, "percent_yes": 54.75344036697247, "percent_no": 45.24655963302753, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.004805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.772347", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide additional funds to help preserve vital City services such as police, fire, emergency medical, library, recreation, local street maintenance and for other general governmental purposes, shall the ordinance to increase the utility users tax from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9068, "fingerprint": "2002|200200330|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200330|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d3b401a98b4fd336", "measure_id": "200200330", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to change the date in which the Mayor and City Councilmembers take office from the second Monday in November to the second Tuesday in January following an election, as set forth in Section 1 of Exhibit A of City Council Resolution No. 95-02 on file in the office of the City Clerk.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10258, "no_votes": 6065, "total_votes": 16323, "percent_yes": 62.84383998039576, "percent_no": 37.15616001960424, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.005160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.772526", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to change the date in which the Mayor and City Councilmembers take office from the second Monday in November to the second Tuesday in January following an election, as set forth in Section 1 of Exhibit A of City Council Resolution No. 95-02 on file in the office of the City Clerk.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11917, "fingerprint": "2002|200200331|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200331|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "162bdceadafb64fc", "measure_id": "200200331", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to change the election dates for the Mayor and Councilmembers from November in odd-numbered years to November in even-numbered years commencing in November, 2004, and to increase by one year the terms of the Mayor and City Councilmembers who are currently in office, as specifically set forth in Section 1 of Exhibit A of City Council Resolution No. 94-02 on file at the office of the City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8993, "no_votes": 7129, "total_votes": 16122, "percent_yes": 55.780920481329865, "percent_no": 44.219079518670135, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.941536", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.005537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.772709", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to change the election dates for the Mayor and Councilmembers from November in odd-numbered years to November in even-numbered years commencing in November, 2004, and to increase by one year the terms of the Mayor and City Councilmembers who are currently in office, as specifically set forth in Section 1 of Exhibit A of City Council Resolution No. 94-02 on file at the office of the City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9054, "fingerprint": "2002|200200003|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200003|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f2ed3b44cacecf0d", "measure_id": "200200003", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 be established at $2,117,675.00 and should the limit for that Fiscal Year (I.e., $2,117,675.00) be used to determine the limits for Fiscal Years 2003-3004 through 2005-2006?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1636, "no_votes": 190, "total_votes": 1826, "percent_yes": 89.5947426067908, "percent_no": 10.405257393209197, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:11.999747", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.769264", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 be established at $2,117,675.00 and should the limit for that Fiscal Year (I.e., $2,117,675.00) be used to determine the limits for Fiscal Years 2003-3004 through 2005-2006?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11913, "fingerprint": "2002|200200237|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200237|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3c52cdf22f6b1dbe", "measure_id": "200200237", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XII-B for County Service Area R-7A be increased to $675,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the fiscal years 2002/2003 through 2005/2006 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2167, "no_votes": 2533, "total_votes": 4700, "percent_yes": 46.1063829787234, "percent_no": 53.8936170212766, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.938914", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.003265", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.771434", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XII-B for County Service Area R-7A be increased to $675,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the fiscal years 2002/2003 through 2005/2006 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9055, "fingerprint": "2002|200200041|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200041|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "716c12f42570291c", "measure_id": "200200041", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2001-03, which ratifies and readopts the 1993 business tax, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6291, "no_votes": 3086, "total_votes": 9377, "percent_yes": 67.08968753332623, "percent_no": 32.91031246667377, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.000054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.769443", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2001-03, which ratifies and readopts the 1993 business tax, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9056, "fingerprint": "2002|200200042|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200042|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "720882a74abde780", "measure_id": "200200042", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed resolution imposing a special library tax in the annual amount of $40 per parcel on every parcel of real estate within City of Hercules, California, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1571, "no_votes": 1316, "total_votes": 2887, "percent_yes": 54.4163491513682, "percent_no": 45.5836508486318, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.000373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.769626", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed resolution imposing a special library tax in the annual amount of $40 per parcel on every parcel of real estate within City of Hercules, California, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9057, "fingerprint": "2002|200200043|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200043|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "36622446649ec05c", "measure_id": "200200043", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Oakley's base-year appropriations limit for Fiscal year 1999-2000 be established at $4,093,783.44?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2491, "no_votes": 681, "total_votes": 3172, "percent_yes": 78.53089533417402, "percent_no": 21.46910466582598, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.000647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.769805", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Oakley's base-year appropriations limit for Fiscal year 1999-2000 be established at $4,093,783.44?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9058, "fingerprint": "2002|200200044|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200044|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "3cdb5a0227e903e9", "measure_id": "200200044", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the San Ramon 2020 General Plan prepared and recommended by the General Plan Review Commission be adopted as the General Plan for the City of San Ramon?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5722, "no_votes": 1686, "total_votes": 7408, "percent_yes": 77.24082073434126, "percent_no": 22.759179265658744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.000916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.769983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Ramon 2020 General Plan prepared and recommended by the General Plan Review Commission be adopted as the General Plan for the City of San Ramon?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9059, "fingerprint": "2002|200200045|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200045|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "473744c3999cc9d4", "measure_id": "200200045", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To restore and improve Walnut Creek's library services by making consistent and increasing the hours the libraries are open; replacing worn and outdated books, materials and equipment; maintaining reading and educational programs for children and services for adults, students and seniors, shall the ordinance be adopted authorizing the City of Walnut Creek to collect a qualified special tax not to exceed $22 per year per residential parcel or equivalent unit beginning July 1, 2002 for Walnut Creek library services and expiring after eight years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13775, "no_votes": 6018, "total_votes": 19793, "percent_yes": 69.59531147375336, "percent_no": 30.404688526246645, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.001219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.770162", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore and improve Walnut Creek's library services by making consistent and increasing the hours the libraries are open; replacing worn and outdated books, materials and equipment; maintaining reading and educational programs for children and services for adults, students and seniors, shall the ordinance be adopted authorizing the City of Walnut Creek to collect a qualified special tax not to exceed $22 per year per residential parcel or equivalent unit beginning July 1, 2002 for Walnut Creek library services and expiring after eight years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9071, "fingerprint": "2002|200200125|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200125|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "eb437f2b5f192b09", "measure_id": "200200125", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $265 million dollars in bonds a the lowest available interest rate, for building and repairing classrooms and facilities; upgrading academic and vocational education programs including computer sciences, electronics, nursing and high-tech training facilities; upgrading libraries; building new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and making building safety improvements at the American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College compuses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20344, "no_votes": 16082, "total_votes": 36426, "percent_yes": 55.85021687805414, "percent_no": 44.14978312194586, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.007451", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.773798", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $265 million dollars in bonds a the lowest available interest rate, for building and repairing classrooms and facilities; upgrading academic and vocational education programs including computer sciences, electronics, nursing and high-tech training facilities; upgrading libraries; building new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and making building safety improvements at the American River, Cosumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College compuses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9074, "fingerprint": "2002|200200530|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200530|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "6f92121d17e81434", "measure_id": "200200530", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make essential health, safety and building improvements, to construct a gymnasium, and to qualify for state construction and renovation funding, shall the Gold Trail Union School District be authorized to issue $1,800,000 in bonds, bearing interest rates not exceeding the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and will conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1639, "no_votes": 938, "total_votes": 2577, "percent_yes": 63.60108653473032, "percent_no": 36.39891346526968, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.008300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.774354", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make essential health, safety and building improvements, to construct a gymnasium, and to qualify for state construction and renovation funding, shall the Gold Trail Union School District be authorized to issue $1,800,000 in bonds, bearing interest rates not exceeding the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and will conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9076, "fingerprint": "2002|200200532|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200532|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "7f2f7065a536b38e", "measure_id": "200200532", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve North Tahoe High and Middle Schools by replacing, constructing, upgrading, and equipping classrooms, library, technology center, aging water system, improving campus safety and security, qualifying for any available State matching funds, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Tahoe-Truckee Unified School district issue $30,450,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to perform annual financial audits to ensure that bond funds are spent for the designated projects and for the benefit of students and the community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 164, "no_votes": 97, "total_votes": 261, "percent_yes": 62.83524904214559, "percent_no": 37.16475095785441, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.009068", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.774718", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve North Tahoe High and Middle Schools by replacing, constructing, upgrading, and equipping classrooms, library, technology center, aging water system, improving campus safety and security, qualifying for any available State matching funds, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Tahoe-Truckee Unified School district issue $30,450,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to perform annual financial audits to ensure that bond funds are spent for the designated projects and for the benefit of students and the community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9075, "fingerprint": "2002|200200531|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200531|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "0c01848d5a708baf", "measure_id": "200200531", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make essential health, safety and building improvements, to modernize and construct new classrooms at existing facilities, and to qualify for state funding, shall the Placerville Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $5,300,000 in bonds, bearing interest reates not exceeding the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and will conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent only on school facility improvements and for no other purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3274, "no_votes": 1622, "total_votes": 4896, "percent_yes": 66.87091503267973, "percent_no": 33.12908496732027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.008754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.774535", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make essential health, safety and building improvements, to modernize and construct new classrooms at existing facilities, and to qualify for state funding, shall the Placerville Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $5,300,000 in bonds, bearing interest reates not exceeding the statutory limit? The Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and will conduct annual audits to assure that funds are spent only on school facility improvements and for no other purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9070, "fingerprint": "2002|200200004|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200004|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "e994ac7184fdb4e8", "measure_id": "200200004", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a $25.00 per year library tax be imposed annually upon all parcels in the El Dorado Hills Zone of Benefit (Zone E) within County Service Area No. 10 for the sole purpose of providing library service within such zone. The tax shall be imposed in the fiscal year 2002-2003, but collection of the tax shall be deferred until completion of construction of a new library facility within the El Dorado Hills zone?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5258, "no_votes": 1936, "total_votes": 7194, "percent_yes": 73.08868501529052, "percent_no": 26.911314984709477, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.007143", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.773616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a $25.00 per year library tax be imposed annually upon all parcels in the El Dorado Hills Zone of Benefit (Zone E) within County Service Area No. 10 for the sole purpose of providing library service within such zone. The tax shall be imposed in the fiscal year 2002-2003, but collection of the tax shall be deferred until completion of construction of a new library facility within the El Dorado Hills zone?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9072, "fingerprint": "2002|200200238|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200238|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "bd195c0996b49194", "measure_id": "200200238", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the adoption of Ordinance No. 4262 by the Board of Supervisors, increasing the transient occupancy tax (hotel/motel tax) from 8% to 10% be approved and ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23436, "no_votes": 28427, "total_votes": 51863, "percent_yes": 45.188284518828446, "percent_no": 54.811715481171554, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.007724", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.773989", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the adoption of Ordinance No. 4262 by the Board of Supervisors, increasing the transient occupancy tax (hotel/motel tax) from 8% to 10% be approved and ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9073, "fingerprint": "2002|200200333|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200333|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "9108b0fac652b198", "measure_id": "200200333", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To maintain existing services within the City of South Lake Tahoe shall: The transient occupancy tax (tourist bed tax) be increased by $1.00-$1.50, per occupied room night for four years only, as specified in the proposed ordinance? And, The existing business and professions tax rates (business license fees) be increased per $1,000 of gross receipts, as follows: Schedules A: $1.04, B: $1.56, C: $2.08, D: $2.60, E: $3.12. Not to exceed $3,000, subject to an annual inflation adjustment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2130, "no_votes": 1665, "total_votes": 3795, "percent_yes": 56.126482213438734, "percent_no": 43.873517786561266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.007997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.774173", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain existing services within the City of South Lake Tahoe shall: The transient occupancy tax (tourist bed tax) be increased by $1.00-$1.50, per occupied room night for four years only, as specified in the proposed ordinance? And, The existing business and professions tax rates (business license fees) be increased per $1,000 of gross receipts, as follows: Schedules A: $1.04, B: $1.56, C: $2.08, D: $2.60, E: $3.12. Not to exceed $3,000, subject to an annual inflation adjustment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9079, "fingerprint": "2002|200200047|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200047|FRESNO", "content_hash": "ccee3aa14078859d", "measure_id": "200200047", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Edward Barela be recalled (removed) from the office of member of city council of the City of Parlier, District No. 1?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82, "no_votes": 91, "total_votes": 173, "percent_yes": 47.39884393063584, "percent_no": 52.60115606936416, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.010049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.775267", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Edward Barela be recalled (removed) from the office of member of city council of the City of Parlier, District No. 1?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11923, "fingerprint": "2002|200200341|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200341|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d65e00cfab2c78bd", "measure_id": "200200341", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of Reedley be elected from districts described by Ordinance No. 2002-04?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2244, "no_votes": 1030, "total_votes": 3274, "percent_yes": 68.54001221747097, "percent_no": 31.459987782529026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.950229", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.014126", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.777522", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the City Council of the City of Reedley be elected from districts described by Ordinance No. 2002-04?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9078, "fingerprint": "2002|200200046|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200046|FRESNO", "content_hash": "7ab7df6c59cb48cf", "measure_id": "200200046", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to provide for advertised competitive bidding for contracts involving City funds exceeding $100,000, exceptions to competitive bidding, a definition of public work of improvement, a design build process, a method for determining the lowest bid when alternative bid forms or additive/deductive items are used, exemption from application of California Public Contract Code, and procurement requirements.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28303, "no_votes": 19072, "total_votes": 47375, "percent_yes": 59.7424802110818, "percent_no": 40.2575197889182, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.009694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.775083", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to provide for advertised competitive bidding for contracts involving City funds exceeding $100,000, exceptions to competitive bidding, a definition of public work of improvement, a design build process, a method for determining the lowest bid when alternative bid forms or additive/deductive items are used, exemption from application of California Public Contract Code, and procurement requirements.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9085, "fingerprint": "2002|200200337|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200337|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f75ef30b775dc992", "measure_id": "200200337", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to add two members to the Retirement Board of the Fresno City Employees Retirement System, to include a member elected by and from the retirees of the Fresno City Employees Retirement System, and a member appointed by the Mayor with approval by Council from the qualified electors of the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30102, "no_votes": 35668, "total_votes": 65770, "percent_yes": 45.76858750190056, "percent_no": 54.23141249809944, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.012591", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.776808", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to add two members to the Retirement Board of the Fresno City Employees Retirement System, to include a member elected by and from the retirees of the Fresno City Employees Retirement System, and a member appointed by the Mayor with approval by Council from the qualified electors of the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11921, "fingerprint": "2002|200200239|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200239|FRESNO", "content_hash": "6aba380befa5e35e", "measure_id": "200200239", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Fresno County voters authorize an extension of up to thirty years of the current one-half percent sales tax to be used in accordance with the Expenditure Plan adopted by the Authority to provide countywide transportation improvements which will contribute to increased mobility, less traffic congestion, improved air quality and increased safety? The Authority is authorized to issue bonds payable from the proceeds of that tax and establishes the appropriations limit of the Authority in the amount of 482 million dollars ($482,000,000).", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76527, "no_votes": 65471, "total_votes": 141998, "percent_yes": 53.89301257764194, "percent_no": 46.10698742235806, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.947716", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.011324", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.776033", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Fresno County voters authorize an extension of up to thirty years of the current one-half percent sales tax to be used in accordance with the Expenditure Plan adopted by the Authority to provide countywide transportation improvements which will contribute to increased mobility, less traffic congestion, improved air quality and increased safety? The Authority is authorized to issue bonds payable from the proceeds of that tax and establishes the appropriations limit of the Authority in the amount of 482 million dollars ($482,000,000).", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9080, "fingerprint": "2002|200200048|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200048|FRESNO", "content_hash": "83a7083aeaa6ad7a", "measure_id": "200200048", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Proposed City of Reedley Measure C (General Plan Amendment No. 99-01 for the Wal-Mart/Otani Project)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1794, "no_votes": 1838, "total_votes": 3632, "percent_yes": 49.3942731277533, "percent_no": 50.6057268722467, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.010336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.775451", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposed City of Reedley Measure C (General Plan Amendment No. 99-01 for the Wal-Mart/Otani Project)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11922, "fingerprint": "2002|200200334|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200334|FRESNO", "content_hash": "126ad638bc773588", "measure_id": "200200334", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer of the City of Firebaugh be appointive? If passed, this measure would take effect immediately. In that event, no candidate for the City Treasurer elected on this ballot would take office.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 265, "no_votes": 306, "total_votes": 571, "percent_yes": 46.40980735551664, "percent_no": 53.59019264448336, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.948099", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.011679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.776221", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer of the City of Firebaugh be appointive? If passed, this measure would take effect immediately. In that event, no candidate for the City Treasurer elected on this ballot would take office.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9081, "fingerprint": "2002|200200049|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200049|FRESNO", "content_hash": "fa5ef47116b7ce91", "measure_id": "200200049", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Proposed City of Reedley Measure D (Change of Zone No. 289 for the Wal-Mart/Otani Project)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1763, "no_votes": 1838, "total_votes": 3601, "percent_yes": 48.958622604832, "percent_no": 51.041377395168, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.010654", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.775637", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposed City of Reedley Measure D (Change of Zone No. 289 for the Wal-Mart/Otani Project)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11925, "fingerprint": "2002|200200536|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200536|FRESNO", "content_hash": "bf26dedfaca0f320", "measure_id": "200200536", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students at Fresno City/Reedley College (Clovis, Madera, Oakhurst Centers) for transfer to four-year colleges and careers, including public safety, firefighting, healthcare technology and business, by upgrading equipment, lighting, wiring, fire safety; replacing portables; repairing plumbing, heating/ventilation; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries, computer labs, buildings, parking, acquiring land, shall State Center Community College District issue $161,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76879, "no_votes": 56031, "total_votes": 132910, "percent_yes": 57.84290121134602, "percent_no": 42.15709878865398, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.951493", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.015355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.778247", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students at Fresno City/Reedley College (Clovis, Madera, Oakhurst Centers) for transfer to four-year colleges and careers, including public safety, firefighting, healthcare technology and business, by upgrading equipment, lighting, wiring, fire safety; replacing portables; repairing plumbing, heating/ventilation; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries, computer labs, buildings, parking, acquiring land, shall State Center Community College District issue $161,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9077, "fingerprint": "2002|200200005|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200005|FRESNO", "content_hash": "1b9d0170dec86482", "measure_id": "200200005", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2000-01 of the Fresno County Zoo Authority be approved to provide additional funding for the support of zoos, zoological facilities, and related zoological purposes within Fresno County by imposing a transactions and use tax at the rate of one-tenth of one percent for a period of 7 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59931, "no_votes": 46165, "total_votes": 106096, "percent_yes": 56.48752073593727, "percent_no": 43.51247926406273, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.009382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.774904", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2000-01 of the Fresno County Zoo Authority be approved to provide additional funding for the support of zoos, zoological facilities, and related zoological purposes within Fresno County by imposing a transactions and use tax at the rate of one-tenth of one percent for a period of 7 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9089, "fingerprint": "2002|200200534|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200534|FRESNO", "content_hash": "7772ae80019de9c7", "measure_id": "200200534", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Dos Palos Ora Loma Joint Unified School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, expand and upgrade school facilities, update inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to classroom computers and modern technology, renovate schools and qualify the District to receive $4,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $4,400,000 of bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 173, "no_votes": 104, "total_votes": 277, "percent_yes": 62.454873646209386, "percent_no": 37.545126353790614, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.014718", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.777886", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Dos Palos Ora Loma Joint Unified School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, expand and upgrade school facilities, update inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to classroom computers and modern technology, renovate schools and qualify the District to receive $4,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $4,400,000 of bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9083, "fingerprint": "2002|200200335|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200335|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d4abbf4b7d9c9cb3", "measure_id": "200200335", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) This measure is not a tax. It is an advisory measure which states the Fowler City voters' preference that any voter approved continuation of the existing utility users tax be used only to fund the City of Fowler Fire and Police Departments to help ensure that these services will continue to be provided at the current level.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 493, "no_votes": 148, "total_votes": 641, "percent_yes": 76.91107644305772, "percent_no": 23.088923556942277, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.011992", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.776408", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) This measure is not a tax. It is an advisory measure which states the Fowler City voters' preference that any voter approved continuation of the existing utility users tax be used only to fund the City of Fowler Fire and Police Departments to help ensure that these services will continue to be provided at the current level.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9084, "fingerprint": "2002|200200336|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200336|FRESNO", "content_hash": "08f3c9a3271c6a17", "measure_id": "200200336", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fowler be authorized to extend, for a period of four (4) years, the existing utility users tax of five percent (5%) upon residential users of electricity and gas, three percent (3%) upon commercial, industrial, and agricultural users of electricity and gas, and five percent (5%) of the base service rate upon all users of telephone service in the City of Fowler, with the tax terminating on January 1, 2007, instead of January 1, 2003, as set forth in Ordinance No. 1999-06 and extension Ordinance No. 2002-04?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 337, "no_votes": 307, "total_votes": 644, "percent_yes": 52.32919254658385, "percent_no": 47.67080745341615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.012288", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.776586", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fowler be authorized to extend, for a period of four (4) years, the existing utility users tax of five percent (5%) upon residential users of electricity and gas, three percent (3%) upon commercial, industrial, and agricultural users of electricity and gas, and five percent (5%) of the base service rate upon all users of telephone service in the City of Fowler, with the tax terminating on January 1, 2007, instead of January 1, 2003, as set forth in Ordinance No. 1999-06 and extension Ordinance No. 2002-04?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9090, "fingerprint": "2002|200200535|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200535|FRESNO", "content_hash": "027f128a3a5c0f2a", "measure_id": "200200535", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To establish a new permanent Los Banos area campus of Merced Community College on land that has been donated to the College, by financing construction of buildings for classrooms, laboratories, libraries, technology and vocational education programs; development of the physical site; and other specified projects; shall Merced Community College District issue $11,930,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit payable from taxes levied only in the Los Banos campus service area, and establish a citizens' bond oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78, "no_votes": 133, "total_votes": 211, "percent_yes": 36.96682464454976, "percent_no": 63.03317535545024, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.014997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.778068", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To establish a new permanent Los Banos area campus of Merced Community College on land that has been donated to the College, by financing construction of buildings for classrooms, laboratories, libraries, technology and vocational education programs; development of the physical site; and other specified projects; shall Merced Community College District issue $11,930,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit payable from taxes levied only in the Los Banos campus service area, and establish a citizens' bond oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11924, "fingerprint": "2002|200200533|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200533|FRESNO", "content_hash": "ecf06fe013f6dcb7", "measure_id": "200200533", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Dinuba Unified School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, expand and upgrade school facilities, including constructing new classrooms and library/media centers, upgrading inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to classroom computers and modern technology, renovate schools and qualify the District to receive $11,400,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $14,915,000 of bonds, with annual audits and oversight by a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 10, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.950504", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.014406", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.777705", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Dinuba Unified School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, expand and upgrade school facilities, including constructing new classrooms and library/media centers, upgrading inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to classroom computers and modern technology, renovate schools and qualify the District to receive $11,400,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $14,915,000 of bonds, with annual audits and oversight by a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9082, "fingerprint": "2002|200200126|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200126|FRESNO", "content_hash": "14d0fdb4e2251481", "measure_id": "200200126", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding in our schools by acquiring property, building, furnishing, and equipping: a high school in Orange Cove, a small high school in Dunlap, and a food service preparation facility at the District Operations site; shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District, serving our communities' children, issue $18 million of bonds for the above purposes, at legal interest rates, with taxpayer safeguards, citizen oversight, and annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4114, "no_votes": 2130, "total_votes": 6244, "percent_yes": 65.88725176169122, "percent_no": 34.11274823830878, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.010985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.775850", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding in our schools by acquiring property, building, furnishing, and equipping: a high school in Orange Cove, a small high school in Dunlap, and a food service preparation facility at the District Operations site; shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District, serving our communities' children, issue $18 million of bonds for the above purposes, at legal interest rates, with taxpayer safeguards, citizen oversight, and annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9086, "fingerprint": "2002|200200338|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200338|FRESNO", "content_hash": "0a8b528d7f16797a", "measure_id": "200200338", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the electors of the City of Huron elect a mayor and four councilmembers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 264, "no_votes": 94, "total_votes": 358, "percent_yes": 73.74301675977654, "percent_no": 26.256983240223462, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.013259", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.776987", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the electors of the City of Huron elect a mayor and four councilmembers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9087, "fingerprint": "2002|200200339|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200339|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f47d61abe6735559", "measure_id": "200200339", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office for Mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 252, "no_votes": 111, "total_votes": 363, "percent_yes": 69.42148760330579, "percent_no": 30.578512396694208, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.013570", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.777165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office for Mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9088, "fingerprint": "2002|200200340|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200340|FRESNO", "content_hash": "1e35f2509aa66bb5", "measure_id": "200200340", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office for Mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95, "no_votes": 170, "total_votes": 265, "percent_yes": 35.84905660377358, "percent_no": 64.15094339622641, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.013851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.777345", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office for Mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9091, "fingerprint": "2002|200200127|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200127|GLENN", "content_hash": "9b39ba4a7b21edc4", "measure_id": "200200127", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for law enforcement, firefighting, nursing, farming and business jobs and four year colleges shall Butte College Construct, repair/equip classrooms, libraries, science/computer labs and facilities; upgrade energy conservation, lighting, electrical, ventilation, and plumbing systems; qualify for State matching funds by Butte-Glenn Community College District issuing $84,900,000 of bonds, at legal rates, appointing a Citizen Oversight Committee to perform annual audits and ensuring that no bond money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2957, "no_votes": 2039, "total_votes": 4996, "percent_yes": 59.18734987990393, "percent_no": 40.81265012009607, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.015692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.778431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for law enforcement, firefighting, nursing, farming and business jobs and four year colleges shall Butte College Construct, repair/equip classrooms, libraries, science/computer labs and facilities; upgrade energy conservation, lighting, electrical, ventilation, and plumbing systems; qualify for State matching funds by Butte-Glenn Community College District issuing $84,900,000 of bonds, at legal rates, appointing a Citizen Oversight Committee to perform annual audits and ensuring that no bond money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9092, "fingerprint": "2002|200200342|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200342|GLENN", "content_hash": "c3d1dade90aaa29a", "measure_id": "200200342", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you support mandatory garbage pick-up being enacted in the City of Orland?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 544, "no_votes": 740, "total_votes": 1284, "percent_yes": 42.36760124610592, "percent_no": 57.63239875389408, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.015989", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.778619", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you support mandatory garbage pick-up being enacted in the City of Orland?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9101, "fingerprint": "2002|200200537|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200537|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "3ef05f7d6a6fc1b4", "measure_id": "200200537", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of reduction of class size and maintenance and enhancement of academic and educational programs by levying a special tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of seven years, beginning July 1, 2003 and increase its appropriation limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1500, "no_votes": 1181, "total_votes": 2681, "percent_yes": 55.94927265945543, "percent_no": 44.05072734054457, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.018795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.780247", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of reduction of class size and maintenance and enhancement of academic and educational programs by levying a special tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of seven years, beginning July 1, 2003 and increase its appropriation limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9096, "fingerprint": "2002|200200240|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200240|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "7616dac573358243", "measure_id": "200200240", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the County continue to assess and collect the 2% increase of the Transient Occupancy Tax (from persons staying in motels, hotels, or similar structures in the county) from the rate of 8% to 10% thereby continuing to collect the Transient Occupancy Tax at the current rate of 10% which has been in effect within the unincorporated area of the County of Humboldt since 1993 adoption of the Humboldt County Ordinance No. 2005, which is codified in Humboldt County Code Title 7, Division One, Chapter Two Sections 712-1 through 712-14?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24714, "no_votes": 15612, "total_votes": 40326, "percent_yes": 61.28552298765064, "percent_no": 38.71447701234936, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.017242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.779341", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the County continue to assess and collect the 2% increase of the Transient Occupancy Tax (from persons staying in motels, hotels, or similar structures in the county) from the rate of 8% to 10% thereby continuing to collect the Transient Occupancy Tax at the current rate of 10% which has been in effect within the unincorporated area of the County of Humboldt since 1993 adoption of the Humboldt County Ordinance No. 2005, which is codified in Humboldt County Code Title 7, Division One, Chapter Two Sections 712-1 through 712-14?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9097, "fingerprint": "2002|200200241|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200241|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "9ebef79aa62bdfa8", "measure_id": "200200241", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the County of Humboldt provide funds for the purposes of maintenance, operation, restoration, construction and/or acquisition of county veterans memorial buildings, and for purposes as defined in Military and Veterans Code Section 1262 by levying a $10.00 per annum special tax on each qualified parcel of real property, beginning July 1, 2003 and continuing for a period  of  ten years, and reducing said levy to $5.00 per annum on each qualified parcel of real property thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17810, "no_votes": 22633, "total_votes": 40443, "percent_yes": 44.037287045965925, "percent_no": 55.962712954034075, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.017513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.779525", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the County of Humboldt provide funds for the purposes of maintenance, operation, restoration, construction and/or acquisition of county veterans memorial buildings, and for purposes as defined in Military and Veterans Code Section 1262 by levying a $10.00 per annum special tax on each qualified parcel of real property, beginning July 1, 2003 and continuing for a period  of  ten years, and reducing said levy to $5.00 per annum on each qualified parcel of real property thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9093, "fingerprint": "2002|200200128|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200128|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "1a64feb8fe7e85df", "measure_id": "200200128", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To address seismic safety, campus safety, and to modernize aging facilities, shall the Eureka Unified School District be authorized to incur $32,515,000 in bonded indebtedness at legal rates to repair, renovate, replace, acquire and furnish middle and high school facilities/sites including electrical, heating, lighting, seismic retrofitting, roofs, portable replacements, science laboratories, technology and support facilities, match $11,500,000 in State modernization grants, form a Citizens' Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and spend no funds on administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7598, "no_votes": 4627, "total_votes": 12225, "percent_yes": 62.15132924335378, "percent_no": 37.84867075664622, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.016264", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.778797", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To address seismic safety, campus safety, and to modernize aging facilities, shall the Eureka Unified School District be authorized to incur $32,515,000 in bonded indebtedness at legal rates to repair, renovate, replace, acquire and furnish middle and high school facilities/sites including electrical, heating, lighting, seismic retrofitting, roofs, portable replacements, science laboratories, technology and support facilities, match $11,500,000 in State modernization grants, form a Citizens' Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and spend no funds on administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9094, "fingerprint": "2002|200200129|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200129|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "27fece98e8776e0b", "measure_id": "200200129", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to finance elementary school improvements and renovations within the former Eureka City Elementary School District, including upgrading electrical, heating, lighting, plumbing, and security systems; constructing science classrooms and libraries; replacing deteriorating portables; and matching $5,000,000 in state modernization grants; shall the Eureka Unified School District issue $10,585,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and spend no funds on administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5059, "no_votes": 2822, "total_votes": 7881, "percent_yes": 64.19236137545997, "percent_no": 35.80763862454003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.016601", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.778979", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to finance elementary school improvements and renovations within the former Eureka City Elementary School District, including upgrading electrical, heating, lighting, plumbing, and security systems; constructing science classrooms and libraries; replacing deteriorating portables; and matching $5,000,000 in state modernization grants; shall the Eureka Unified School District issue $10,585,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and spend no funds on administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9095, "fingerprint": "2002|200200130|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200130|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "75fc5175329d6957", "measure_id": "200200130", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs' construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades, construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 on bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens' Oversight committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10, "no_votes": 14, "total_votes": 24, "percent_yes": 41.66666666666667, "percent_no": 58.33333333333333, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.016927", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.779161", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs' construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades, construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 on bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens' Oversight committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9100, "fingerprint": "2002|200200345|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200345|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "c86aac6d93969a9d", "measure_id": "200200345", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the city of Fortuna amend the Transient Occupancy Tax (for staying in motels/RV parks) from 8% to 10% and allocate 1% of Transient Occupancy Tax collected annually for the Fortuna Chamber of Commerce to be used for the promotion of tourism?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2098, "no_votes": 1026, "total_votes": 3124, "percent_yes": 67.15749039692702, "percent_no": 32.84250960307298, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.018496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.780064", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city of Fortuna amend the Transient Occupancy Tax (for staying in motels/RV parks) from 8% to 10% and allocate 1% of Transient Occupancy Tax collected annually for the Fortuna Chamber of Commerce to be used for the promotion of tourism?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9098, "fingerprint": "2002|200200343|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200343|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ee6b0f53daf6bce2", "measure_id": "200200343", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to extend the currently assessed three percent (3%) utility user tax, the general tax on the use of certain utility services used to fund essential services such as police, fire, street maintenance, and parks and recreation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3818, "no_votes": 3637, "total_votes": 7455, "percent_yes": 51.21395036887995, "percent_no": 48.78604963112005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.017884", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.779708", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Eureka Municipal Code be amended to extend the currently assessed three percent (3%) utility user tax, the general tax on the use of certain utility services used to fund essential services such as police, fire, street maintenance, and parks and recreation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9099, "fingerprint": "2002|200200344|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200344|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "d0d13b6b375e8aa0", "measure_id": "200200344", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Municipal Charter of the City of Eureka be amended to provide that the City Council shall declare the results of the General Municipal Election at its first regular meeting after the election returns have been certified, and to specify that newly elected officers shall take office at the meeting of the City Council at which the results are declared?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5008, "no_votes": 1941, "total_votes": 6949, "percent_yes": 72.06792344222191, "percent_no": 27.93207655777809, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.018204", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.779886", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Municipal Charter of the City of Eureka be amended to provide that the City Council shall declare the results of the General Municipal Election at its first regular meeting after the election returns have been certified, and to specify that newly elected officers shall take office at the meeting of the City Council at which the results are declared?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9102, "fingerprint": "2002|200200050|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200050|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "eb97256c78ef138d", "measure_id": "200200050", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 993 be adopted to amend Section 17.05.140 of Chapter 17.05 of the City of Calexico Municipal Code by adding a paragraph entitled \"Limitations on Retail Stores in Excess of 150,000 Square Feet\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1530, "no_votes": 2953, "total_votes": 4483, "percent_yes": 34.12893151907205, "percent_no": 65.87106848092796, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.019132", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.780430", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 993 be adopted to amend Section 17.05.140 of Chapter 17.05 of the City of Calexico Municipal Code by adding a paragraph entitled \"Limitations on Retail Stores in Excess of 150,000 Square Feet\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9103, "fingerprint": "2002|200200051|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200051|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "6df9ca3ab099a256", "measure_id": "200200051", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 999 be adopted to validate the existing transient occupancy tax (a hotel bed tax) and to increased the rate of the existing tax from 10% to 11% to partially replace property taxes taken from the City to balance the State Budget?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1455, "no_votes": 2591, "total_votes": 4046, "percent_yes": 35.96144340088977, "percent_no": 64.03855659911022, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.019484", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.780611", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 999 be adopted to validate the existing transient occupancy tax (a hotel bed tax) and to increased the rate of the existing tax from 10% to 11% to partially replace property taxes taken from the City to balance the State Budget?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9104, "fingerprint": "2002|200200242|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200242|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "8f9495c7913f3f25", "measure_id": "200200242", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Imperial County Ordinance No. 1351, which imposes, for no more than ten (10) years, a public safety transactions and use tax (i.e., sales tax), of one-quarter percent (0.25%), upon retail transactions within the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County of Imperial, be adopted? The proceeds of the tax shall be used for the purpose of funding public safety staffing, equipment and facilities for the County of Imperial and cities located therein.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7674, "no_votes": 13146, "total_votes": 20820, "percent_yes": 36.85878962536023, "percent_no": 63.14121037463977, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.019786", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.780794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Imperial County Ordinance No. 1351, which imposes, for no more than ten (10) years, a public safety transactions and use tax (i.e., sales tax), of one-quarter percent (0.25%), upon retail transactions within the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County of Imperial, be adopted? The proceeds of the tax shall be used for the purpose of funding public safety staffing, equipment and facilities for the County of Imperial and cities located therein.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9105, "fingerprint": "2002|200200538|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200538|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "a52f4bb287b091f7", "measure_id": "200200538", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance student safety, install fire safety, energy, emergency communication systems; upgrade electrical wiring, heating, ventilation, lighting, sewer, water/bathroom plumbing systems; construct/acquire/renovate/equip classrooms, math/computer technology labs, libraries, multi-purpose facilities; repair roofs; repair/improve sites; qualify for State matching funds, shall Holtville Unified School District issue $8,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen Oversight Committee to perform annual audits, prevent waste and prevent money from being used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1282, "no_votes": 384, "total_votes": 1666, "percent_yes": 76.95078031212485, "percent_no": 23.04921968787515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.020088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.780979", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance student safety, install fire safety, energy, emergency communication systems; upgrade electrical wiring, heating, ventilation, lighting, sewer, water/bathroom plumbing systems; construct/acquire/renovate/equip classrooms, math/computer technology labs, libraries, multi-purpose facilities; repair roofs; repair/improve sites; qualify for State matching funds, shall Holtville Unified School District issue $8,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen Oversight Committee to perform annual audits, prevent waste and prevent money from being used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9106, "fingerprint": "2002|200200539|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200539|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "d9122e314c0ee03e", "measure_id": "200200539", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, replace, acquire, construct school facilities including a new classroom wing, provide wiring for computers, meet fire/health/safety standards, provide needed heating/air conditioning improvements at our existing school, shall the McCabe Union Elementary School District issue $2,500,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible and appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to assure that funds are spent only at our existing and on school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 348, "no_votes": 227, "total_votes": 575, "percent_yes": 60.52173913043478, "percent_no": 39.47826086956522, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.020396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.781162", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, replace, acquire, construct school facilities including a new classroom wing, provide wiring for computers, meet fire/health/safety standards, provide needed heating/air conditioning improvements at our existing school, shall the McCabe Union Elementary School District issue $2,500,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible and appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to assure that funds are spent only at our existing and on school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9107, "fingerprint": "2002|200200006|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200006|INYO", "content_hash": "33d6d361dd1a2150", "measure_id": "200200006", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Ordinance using Tobacco Settlement Funds to create a Countywide Health Grant Program be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2149, "no_votes": 3115, "total_votes": 5264, "percent_yes": 40.82446808510638, "percent_no": 59.17553191489362, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.020741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.781346", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance using Tobacco Settlement Funds to create a Countywide Health Grant Program be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9108, "fingerprint": "2002|200200007|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200007|INYO", "content_hash": "4cb41ed452ef83bc", "measure_id": "200200007", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Ordinance requiring transfer of all Tobacco Settlement Funds to the Northern Inyo and Southern Inyo Hospital Districts be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3775, "no_votes": 2698, "total_votes": 6473, "percent_yes": 58.31917194500231, "percent_no": 41.68082805499769, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.021077", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.781525", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance requiring transfer of all Tobacco Settlement Funds to the Northern Inyo and Southern Inyo Hospital Districts be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9114, "fingerprint": "2002|200200227|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200227|KERN", "content_hash": "e70db57f77c53a8e", "measure_id": "200200227", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall JUAN M. OLIVARES be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 662, "no_votes": 743, "total_votes": 1405, "percent_yes": 47.11743772241993, "percent_no": 52.88256227758007, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-08-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.022958", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.782624", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall JUAN M. OLIVARES be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9110, "fingerprint": "2002|200200131|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200131|KERN", "content_hash": "d43ca57d1b8e6afa", "measure_id": "200200131", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Greenfield Union School District: Build a new elementary school, renovate McKee Intermediate as a middle school, modernize Planz and Plantation Elementary Schools, construct a Family/Community Center, make health and safety improvements, upgrade classrooms, libraries, and computer labs, provide handicapped access, by issuing $5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2242, "no_votes": 1181, "total_votes": 3423, "percent_yes": 65.49810108092316, "percent_no": 34.50189891907684, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.021724", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.781897", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Greenfield Union School District: Build a new elementary school, renovate McKee Intermediate as a middle school, modernize Planz and Plantation Elementary Schools, construct a Family/Community Center, make health and safety improvements, upgrade classrooms, libraries, and computer labs, provide handicapped access, by issuing $5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9111, "fingerprint": "2002|200200132|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200132|KERN", "content_hash": "21944edf859d3406", "measure_id": "200200132", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain existing school programs, improve the quality of education, and to provide funds to modernize and update school facilities, shall the Mojave Unified School District levy a parcel tax in the amount of $25.50 to be levied annually for a period of five years by commencing July 1, 2002 and through June 30, 2007?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1772, "no_votes": 813, "total_votes": 2585, "percent_yes": 68.54932301740813, "percent_no": 31.450676982591872, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.022028", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.782077", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain existing school programs, improve the quality of education, and to provide funds to modernize and update school facilities, shall the Mojave Unified School District levy a parcel tax in the amount of $25.50 to be levied annually for a period of five years by commencing July 1, 2002 and through June 30, 2007?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9112, "fingerprint": "2002|200200133|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200133|KERN", "content_hash": "995ae842e098a9ec", "measure_id": "200200133", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue bonds not to exceed $16,000,000 for the purpose of acquiring real property for, and financing the construction of, a new high school and a new elementary school in California City, with bonds sold at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1365, "no_votes": 552, "total_votes": 1917, "percent_yes": 71.20500782472612, "percent_no": 28.794992175273876, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.022330", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.782257", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue bonds not to exceed $16,000,000 for the purpose of acquiring real property for, and financing the construction of, a new high school and a new elementary school in California City, with bonds sold at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9109, "fingerprint": "2002|200200008|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200008|KERN", "content_hash": "345cba784e290ed3", "measure_id": "200200008", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the proposed county ordinance be enacted in order to maintain the existing increase in the rate from six percent to ten percent (10%) for the transient occupancy tax charged on room rental in hotels, motels, and similar establishments located in the unincorporated areas of the County of Kern?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34758, "no_votes": 62719, "total_votes": 97477, "percent_yes": 35.65764231562317, "percent_no": 64.34235768437682, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.021370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.781713", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed county ordinance be enacted in order to maintain the existing increase in the rate from six percent to ten percent (10%) for the transient occupancy tax charged on room rental in hotels, motels, and similar establishments located in the unincorporated areas of the County of Kern?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9113, "fingerprint": "2002|200200223|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200223|KERN", "content_hash": "c1fd61277e432d73", "measure_id": "200200223", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable Richland School District to build a new school to reduce student overcrowding; bring existing schools up to standard, including upgrading heating, cooling, plumbing, and electrical systems; improve access to modern classroom technology; make health and safety improvements; and qualify for State funds up to $5,100,000 for these purposes, shall the District be authorized to issue $13,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, for acquisition, construction, and improvement of school buildings and grounds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1006, "no_votes": 277, "total_votes": 1283, "percent_yes": 78.4099766173032, "percent_no": 21.5900233826968, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-06-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.022628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.782437", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable Richland School District to build a new school to reduce student overcrowding; bring existing schools up to standard, including upgrading heating, cooling, plumbing, and electrical systems; improve access to modern classroom technology; make health and safety improvements; and qualify for State funds up to $5,100,000 for these purposes, shall the District be authorized to issue $13,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, for acquisition, construction, and improvement of school buildings and grounds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9120, "fingerprint": "2002|200200541|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200541|KERN", "content_hash": "62cf26056a09131b", "measure_id": "200200541", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for four-year colleges and jobs in nursing, public safety, and business at Bakersfield, Cerro Coso, and Porterville Colleges by removing hazardous materials, leaky roofs, decaying walls; improving fire safety, lighting, and security systems; upgrading computer technology; renovating, constructing, equipping/acquiring buildings, classrooms; shall Kern Community College Safety, Repair and Improvement District issue $180 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual fiscal audits, a Citizens Oversight Committee; NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71464, "no_votes": 49347, "total_votes": 120811, "percent_yes": 59.15355389823775, "percent_no": 40.84644610176225, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.024690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.783711", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for four-year colleges and jobs in nursing, public safety, and business at Bakersfield, Cerro Coso, and Porterville Colleges by removing hazardous materials, leaky roofs, decaying walls; improving fire safety, lighting, and security systems; upgrading computer technology; renovating, constructing, equipping/acquiring buildings, classrooms; shall Kern Community College Safety, Repair and Improvement District issue $180 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual fiscal audits, a Citizens Oversight Committee; NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9122, "fingerprint": "2002|200200543|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200543|KERN", "content_hash": "82403c14c3f4ec42", "measure_id": "200200543", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete construction of Westpark School, enhance technology capabilities at all schools, acquire school facilities the District is currently leasing, allow schools to continue implement class size reduction, expand/construct student support facilities, and make the District eligible to receive approximately $7,000,000 in State matching funds, shall the Southern Kern Unified School District be authorized to issue $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, subject to oversight by a citizens' committee, and annual financial and performance audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1914, "no_votes": 1135, "total_votes": 3049, "percent_yes": 62.774680223023935, "percent_no": 37.225319776976065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.025345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.784073", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete construction of Westpark School, enhance technology capabilities at all schools, acquire school facilities the District is currently leasing, allow schools to continue implement class size reduction, expand/construct student support facilities, and make the District eligible to receive approximately $7,000,000 in State matching funds, shall the Southern Kern Unified School District be authorized to issue $12,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, subject to oversight by a citizens' committee, and annual financial and performance audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9119, "fingerprint": "2002|200200540|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200540|KERN", "content_hash": "9ddd30a64685ae17", "measure_id": "200200540", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, modernize and construct classrooms and improve student support facilities, renovate plumbing and water systems, make health and safety improvements, replace roofs, upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and modern technology, and qualify for State funds up to $1,000,000 shall the Buttonwillow Union School District issue $6,500,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring the appointment of a citizens' oversight committee and annual financial audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 223, "no_votes": 62, "total_votes": 285, "percent_yes": 78.24561403508771, "percent_no": 21.754385964912288, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.024390", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.783527", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, modernize and construct classrooms and improve student support facilities, renovate plumbing and water systems, make health and safety improvements, replace roofs, upgrade electrical systems to improve access to computers and modern technology, and qualify for State funds up to $1,000,000 shall the Buttonwillow Union School District issue $6,500,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring the appointment of a citizens' oversight committee and annual financial audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9121, "fingerprint": "2002|200200542|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200542|KERN", "content_hash": "1deb95fd7fb45611", "measure_id": "200200542", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Linns Valley-Poso Flat Union Elementary School District: Remodel the school kitchen and provide necessary equipment, Purchase and install playground equipment, Refurbish classroom cabinets, counters, and window coverings and upgrade doors to meet current safety and disability standards, by issuing $340,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 128, "no_votes": 57, "total_votes": 185, "percent_yes": 69.1891891891892, "percent_no": 30.810810810810807, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.024996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.783893", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Linns Valley-Poso Flat Union Elementary School District: Remodel the school kitchen and provide necessary equipment, Purchase and install playground equipment, Refurbish classroom cabinets, counters, and window coverings and upgrade doors to meet current safety and disability standards, by issuing $340,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9115, "fingerprint": "2002|200200243|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200243|KERN", "content_hash": "fd8baead5f11dabc", "measure_id": "200200243", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall there be enacted the proposed Kern County Campaign Finance Reform Ordinance setting campaign contribution limits and voluntary expenditure ceilings, establishing a cumulative contribution disclosure requirement, and creating an administrative panel to hear alleged violations and impose penalties?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75803, "no_votes": 50344, "total_votes": 126147, "percent_yes": 60.09100493868264, "percent_no": 39.90899506131736, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.023250", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.782803", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be enacted the proposed Kern County Campaign Finance Reform Ordinance setting campaign contribution limits and voluntary expenditure ceilings, establishing a cumulative contribution disclosure requirement, and creating an administrative panel to hear alleged violations and impose penalties?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9116, "fingerprint": "2002|200200346|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200346|KERN", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200200346", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2002, "no_votes": 1674, "total_votes": 3676, "percent_yes": 54.4613710554951, "percent_no": 45.5386289445049, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.023538", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.782982", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9117, "fingerprint": "2002|200200347|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200347|KERN", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200200347", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 979, "no_votes": 1094, "total_votes": 2073, "percent_yes": 47.226242161119146, "percent_no": 52.773757838880854, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.023831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.783162", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9118, "fingerprint": "2002|200200348|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200348|KERN", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "200200348", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 952, "no_votes": 1096, "total_votes": 2048, "percent_yes": 46.484375, "percent_no": 53.515625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.024094", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.783348", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9124, "fingerprint": "2002|200200544|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200544|KINGS", "content_hash": "d718dad897f79c61", "measure_id": "200200544", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable Lemoore Union Elementary School District to construct a new elementary school to reduce student overcrowding and preserve class-size reduction, build additional classrooms and support facilities, provide improved access to computers and modern technology; and to qualify for $1,700,000 in State funds for eligible projects, shall the district be authorized to issue $7,200,000 in bonds, at interest rates within the statutory limit, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher or administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2198, "no_votes": 2031, "total_votes": 4229, "percent_yes": 51.97446204776542, "percent_no": 48.02553795223458, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.025954", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.784444", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable Lemoore Union Elementary School District to construct a new elementary school to reduce student overcrowding and preserve class-size reduction, build additional classrooms and support facilities, provide improved access to computers and modern technology; and to qualify for $1,700,000 in State funds for eligible projects, shall the district be authorized to issue $7,200,000 in bonds, at interest rates within the statutory limit, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher or administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9125, "fingerprint": "2002|200200545|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200545|KINGS", "content_hash": "e205aca4d63e041a", "measure_id": "200200545", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students at Fresno City/Reedley College (Clovis, Madera, Oakhurst Centers) for transfer to four-year colleges and careers, including public safety, firefighting, healthcare technology and business, by upgrading equipment, lighting, wiring, fire safety; replacing portables; repairing plumbing, heating/ventilation; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries, computer labs, buildings, parking, acquiring land, shall State Center Community College District issue $161,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 103, "no_votes": 165, "total_votes": 268, "percent_yes": 38.43283582089552, "percent_no": 61.56716417910448, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.026269", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.784631", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students at Fresno City/Reedley College (Clovis, Madera, Oakhurst Centers) for transfer to four-year colleges and careers, including public safety, firefighting, healthcare technology and business, by upgrading equipment, lighting, wiring, fire safety; replacing portables; repairing plumbing, heating/ventilation; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries, computer labs, buildings, parking, acquiring land, shall State Center Community College District issue $161,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9123, "fingerprint": "2002|200200009|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200009|KINGS", "content_hash": "ceb7dea994ff27c1", "measure_id": "200200009", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a one-half of one percent sales and use tax for the purpose of financing the development and construction of a new Kings County Jail and the expansion of Juvenile Detention Facilities?  The tax shall expire at the end of eight years, but the Board of Supervisors shall have the power and authority to repair the tax earlier, prior to the expiration of the eight-year period?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9163, "no_votes": 4967, "total_votes": 14130, "percent_yes": 64.8478414720453, "percent_no": 35.1521585279547, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.025647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.784260", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a one-half of one percent sales and use tax for the purpose of financing the development and construction of a new Kings County Jail and the expansion of Juvenile Detention Facilities?  The tax shall expire at the end of eight years, but the Board of Supervisors shall have the power and authority to repair the tax earlier, prior to the expiration of the eight-year period?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9126, "fingerprint": "2002|200200134|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200134|LASSEN", "content_hash": "d85e1d785fa5e868", "measure_id": "200200134", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs: construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades; construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens Oversight Committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66, "no_votes": 76, "total_votes": 142, "percent_yes": 46.478873239436616, "percent_no": 53.521126760563384, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.026559", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.784817", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs: construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades; construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens Oversight Committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9131, "fingerprint": "2002|200200248|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200248|LASSEN", "content_hash": "369ec7fb328d323f", "measure_id": "200200248", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Westwood Community Services District levy a special tax on each parcel of real property located within the boundaries of the District in an amount not to exceed $45.00 per year for the purpose of funding fire protection and prevention services in accordance with Section 53978 of the Government Code to be collected in the manner authorized by Division 1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 369, "no_votes": 189, "total_votes": 558, "percent_yes": 66.12903225806451, "percent_no": 33.87096774193549, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.031296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.785730", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Westwood Community Services District levy a special tax on each parcel of real property located within the boundaries of the District in an amount not to exceed $45.00 per year for the purpose of funding fire protection and prevention services in accordance with Section 53978 of the Government Code to be collected in the manner authorized by Division 1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9128, "fingerprint": "2002|200200245|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200245|LASSEN", "content_hash": "fbcd0c6258fb0799", "measure_id": "200200245", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the existing special tax be repealed and replaced by a special property tax for fire suppression, prevention, rescue and emergency medical services within the Spalding Community Services District, as established by Resolution No. 2002-4, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82, "no_votes": 79, "total_votes": 161, "percent_yes": 50.931677018633536, "percent_no": 49.068322981366464, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.027454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.785180", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing special tax be repealed and replaced by a special property tax for fire suppression, prevention, rescue and emergency medical services within the Spalding Community Services District, as established by Resolution No. 2002-4, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9127, "fingerprint": "2002|200200244|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200244|LASSEN", "content_hash": "a7391d9426e6b704", "measure_id": "200200244", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) A measure to amend Lassen County's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and the Standish-Litchfield Area Plan to allow for development of a recreational mountain resort area at Belfast Road, near Litchfield.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3910, "no_votes": 3481, "total_votes": 7391, "percent_yes": 52.902178324989855, "percent_no": 47.097821675010145, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.026900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.784998", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) A measure to amend Lassen County's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and the Standish-Litchfield Area Plan to allow for development of a recreational mountain resort area at Belfast Road, near Litchfield.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9130, "fingerprint": "2002|200200247|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200247|LASSEN", "content_hash": "516fd5a7a131cd0a", "measure_id": "200200247", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the existing special tax be repealed and replaced by a special property tax for fire suppression, prevention, rescue and emergency medical services within the Stones-Bengard Community Services District, as established by Resolution 2002-02, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63, "no_votes": 8, "total_votes": 71, "percent_yes": 88.73239436619718, "percent_no": 11.267605633802816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.030382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.785546", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing special tax be repealed and replaced by a special property tax for fire suppression, prevention, rescue and emergency medical services within the Stones-Bengard Community Services District, as established by Resolution 2002-02, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9129, "fingerprint": "2002|200200246|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200246|LASSEN", "content_hash": "f18724b5488feae2", "measure_id": "200200246", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special property tax for the community wastewater system project of the Spalding Community Services District as established by Resolution No. 2002-9, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72, "no_votes": 89, "total_votes": 161, "percent_yes": 44.72049689440994, "percent_no": 55.27950310559006, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.028547", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.785363", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special property tax for the community wastewater system project of the Spalding Community Services District as established by Resolution No. 2002-9, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9166, "fingerprint": "2002|200200558|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200558|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "504619f60ca61a77", "measure_id": "200200558", "measure_letter": " EE", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SAFETY ACT OF 2002. To provide academic achievement and safety for school children, shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax limited to $300 per parcel per annum for a 12 year period, adjusted annually using the CPI-U? Revenues will be used to improve access and raise achievement for all the students, attract outstanding teachers, reduce class size, provide materials, equipment, and well-maintained safe schools, with citizens' oversight and annual financial audits.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19613, "no_votes": 12429, "total_votes": 32042, "percent_yes": 61.2102864989701, "percent_no": 38.7897135010299, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.055651", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.796299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SAFETY ACT OF 2002. To provide academic achievement and safety for school children, shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax limited to $300 per parcel per annum for a 12 year period, adjusted annually using the CPI-U? Revenues will be used to improve access and raise achievement for all the students, attract outstanding teachers, reduce class size, provide materials, equipment, and well-maintained safe schools, with citizens' oversight and annual financial audits.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11928, "fingerprint": "2002|200200249|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200249|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5934e50237c62cf5", "measure_id": "200200249", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "EARTHQUAKE AND FIRE SAFETY BOND. To ensure that the Natural History Museum and other County Museums meet strict earthquake and fire safety standards, generate at least 250 million dollars in private donations for these facilities, provide 50% more free admissions for student groups and children, and assure fire and earthquake safe science and arts education facilities, shall the County issue up to 250 million dollars in bonds on the condition that the private donations be received first, with review by an Independent Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 965963, "no_votes": 629545, "total_votes": 1595508, "percent_yes": 60.542661020815935, "percent_no": 39.457338979184065, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.969410", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.040729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.790184", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EARTHQUAKE AND FIRE SAFETY BOND. To ensure that the Natural History Museum and other County Museums meet strict earthquake and fire safety standards, generate at least 250 million dollars in private donations for these facilities, provide 50% more free admissions for student groups and children, and assure fire and earthquake safe science and arts education facilities, shall the County issue up to 250 million dollars in bonds on the condition that the private donations be received first, with review by an Independent Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9132, "fingerprint": "2002|200200010|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200010|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "daaf95f64c79828c", "measure_id": "200200010", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT. TERM LIMITS: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, SHERIFF, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ASSESSOR. Limits any person elected to the office of the Board of Supervisors, Sheriff, District Attorney or Assessor to three consecutive terms commencing December 2002; provided, such limitation does not apply to any unexpired term if the remainder of that term is less than one-half of the full term of office.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 546239, "no_votes": 355495, "total_votes": 901734, "percent_yes": 60.576511476776965, "percent_no": 39.423488523223035, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.032834", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.785910", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT. TERM LIMITS: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, SHERIFF, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ASSESSOR. Limits any person elected to the office of the Board of Supervisors, Sheriff, District Attorney or Assessor to three consecutive terms commencing December 2002; provided, such limitation does not apply to any unexpired term if the remainder of that term is less than one-half of the full term of office.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11940, "fingerprint": "2002|200200547|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200547|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7aa6ab92b91be005", "measure_id": "200200547", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to enable the Baldwin Park Unified School District to access State matching funds, to construct new facilities and modernize and enlarge its existing facilities, thereby accelerating all educational opportunities, shall the District issue $46.6 million in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to construct new classrooms, multipurpose rooms, libraries, bathrooms, gymnasium and support facilities, and related site improvements, and modernize and enlarge existing buildings, subject to oversight by an independent citizens' committee as legally required?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6321, "no_votes": 1631, "total_votes": 7952, "percent_yes": 79.48943661971832, "percent_no": 20.51056338028168, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.974705", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.050804", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.794283", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to enable the Baldwin Park Unified School District to access State matching funds, to construct new facilities and modernize and enlarge its existing facilities, thereby accelerating all educational opportunities, shall the District issue $46.6 million in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to construct new classrooms, multipurpose rooms, libraries, bathrooms, gymnasium and support facilities, and related site improvements, and modernize and enlarge existing buildings, subject to oversight by an independent citizens' committee as legally required?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9145, "fingerprint": "2002|200200138|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200138|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "07eaf1e3777f457f", "measure_id": "200200138", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade and improve all Fullerton Joint Union High School District comprehensive schools, acquire/construct additional classrooms, science/computer labs, restrooms, libraries and school facilities to alleviate overcrowding and accommodate enrollment growth, address building safety/health issues including: upgrade electrical wiring and power, repair/upgrade deteriorating restrooms/plumbing/food services and make other improvements to school sites and buildings, shall the Fullerton Joint Union High School District issue $67,940,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limits with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2199, "no_votes": 1366, "total_votes": 3565, "percent_yes": 61.68302945301542, "percent_no": 38.31697054698458, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.037768", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.788449", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade and improve all Fullerton Joint Union High School District comprehensive schools, acquire/construct additional classrooms, science/computer labs, restrooms, libraries and school facilities to alleviate overcrowding and accommodate enrollment growth, address building safety/health issues including: upgrade electrical wiring and power, repair/upgrade deteriorating restrooms/plumbing/food services and make other improvements to school sites and buildings, shall the Fullerton Joint Union High School District issue $67,940,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limits with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11929, "fingerprint": "2002|200200250|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200250|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a8bc614e97b595bb", "measure_id": "200200250", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "PRESERVATION OF TRAUMA CENTERS AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; BIOTERRORISM RESPONSE. To avoid the life-threatening shutdown of Los Angeles County's trauma network, maintain and expand the trauma network countywide, ensure more timely response to critical and urgent medical emergencies and respond effectively to biological or chemical terrorism, shall all property owners pay an annual tax of three cents per square foot of improvements (buildings) on developed property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1180551, "no_votes": 629545, "total_votes": 1810096, "percent_yes": 65.22035295365549, "percent_no": 34.77964704634451, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.969700", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.041050", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.790370", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PRESERVATION OF TRAUMA CENTERS AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; BIOTERRORISM RESPONSE. To avoid the life-threatening shutdown of Los Angeles County's trauma network, maintain and expand the trauma network countywide, ensure more timely response to critical and urgent medical emergencies and respond effectively to biological or chemical terrorism, shall all property owners pay an annual tax of three cents per square foot of improvements (buildings) on developed property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9133, "fingerprint": "2002|200200011|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200011|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "878e394c8641147e", "measure_id": "200200011", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT. TERM LIMITS: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. Limits any person elected to the office of the Board of Supervisors to three consecutive terms commencing December, 2002; provided, such limitation does not apply to any unexpired term if the remainder of that term is less than one-half of the full term of office.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 563447, "no_votes": 322830, "total_votes": 886277, "percent_yes": 63.57459349616429, "percent_no": 36.42540650383571, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.033528", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.786089", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT. TERM LIMITS: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. Limits any person elected to the office of the Board of Supervisors to three consecutive terms commencing December, 2002; provided, such limitation does not apply to any unexpired term if the remainder of that term is less than one-half of the full term of office.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11945, "fingerprint": "2002|200200555|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200555|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8c582fe66f10c615", "measure_id": "200200555", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety and relieve overcrowding in Lynwood schools, by acquiring land for a new elementary school, new high school, and new interim classrooms, and to expand two elementary schools, and for furniture, fixtures, and equipment, and not for salaries or other administrative costs, shall the Lynwood Unified School District issue $20,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with all the money benefiting Lynwood school children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4448, "no_votes": 1351, "total_votes": 5799, "percent_yes": 76.70287980686325, "percent_no": 23.29712019313675, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.976305", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.054708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.795746", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety and relieve overcrowding in Lynwood schools, by acquiring land for a new elementary school, new high school, and new interim classrooms, and to expand two elementary schools, and for furniture, fixtures, and equipment, and not for salaries or other administrative costs, shall the Lynwood Unified School District issue $20,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with all the money benefiting Lynwood school children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9134, "fingerprint": "2002|200200012|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200012|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9161f1eaf17b6324", "measure_id": "200200012", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT. SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT-RESTRUCTURING. Shall the oversight of the Sheriff's Department be increased by adding one Assistant Sheriff and four Division Chiefs to the unclassified service; provided the additional Assistant Sheriff and two Division Chiefs may be non-sworn and appointed from outside the Sheriff's Department.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 513060, "no_votes": 358781, "total_votes": 871841, "percent_yes": 58.84788625448907, "percent_no": 41.15211374551093, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.033912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.786269", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT. SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT-RESTRUCTURING. Shall the oversight of the Sheriff's Department be increased by adding one Assistant Sheriff and four Division Chiefs to the unclassified service; provided the additional Assistant Sheriff and two Division Chiefs may be non-sworn and appointed from outside the Sheriff's Department.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9163, "fingerprint": "2002|200200548|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200548|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9cde88403fe16b50", "measure_id": "200200548", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To better prepare local students for jobs and four-year colleges, shall Compton Community College District repair and renovate academic classrooms and job training facilities; upgrade safety security systems, electrical capacity, computer technology, energy efficiency, and leaky roofs; relieve student overcrowding; and repair, renovate, construct, acquire and equip classrooms, facilities and sites; by issuing $100,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens Oversight Committee and performing annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23005, "no_votes": 7136, "total_votes": 30141, "percent_yes": 76.32460767725026, "percent_no": 23.675392322749744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.051338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.794465", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To better prepare local students for jobs and four-year colleges, shall Compton Community College District repair and renovate academic classrooms and job training facilities; upgrade safety security systems, electrical capacity, computer technology, energy efficiency, and leaky roofs; relieve student overcrowding; and repair, renovate, construct, acquire and equip classrooms, facilities and sites; by issuing $100,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens Oversight Committee and performing annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9164, "fingerprint": "2002|200200550|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200550|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1b1fc9a603335f57", "measure_id": "200200550", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to enable the Downey Unified School District to continue providing exceptional educational opportunities and modernize its deteriorating facilities, shall the District issue $65 million in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to modernize, repair, and replace and equip its school facilities to meet safety and instructional needs and create additional space for student enrollment growth, additional educational programs and other needs, subject to oversight by an independent citizens' committee as legally required?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13257, "no_votes": 6514, "total_votes": 19771, "percent_yes": 67.0527540336857, "percent_no": 32.9472459663143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.052382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.794829", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to enable the Downey Unified School District to continue providing exceptional educational opportunities and modernize its deteriorating facilities, shall the District issue $65 million in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to modernize, repair, and replace and equip its school facilities to meet safety and instructional needs and create additional space for student enrollment growth, additional educational programs and other needs, subject to oversight by an independent citizens' committee as legally required?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11942, "fingerprint": "2002|200200551|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200551|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "49c6d26feeb94c3c", "measure_id": "200200551", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare El Camino College students for jobs and four-year colleges; repair buildings, classrooms, science labs; upgrade earthquake fire safety; repair sidewalks, leaky roofs, drainage water pipes; upgrade wiring equipment for computer technology; enhance nursing/firefighter training; construct, acquire, and equip modern classrooms buildings; improve campus security, shall El Camino Community College District issue $394,516,464 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68095, "no_votes": 42446, "total_votes": 110541, "percent_yes": 61.60157769515383, "percent_no": 38.39842230484617, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.975508", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.052964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.795014", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare El Camino College students for jobs and four-year colleges; repair buildings, classrooms, science labs; upgrade earthquake fire safety; repair sidewalks, leaky roofs, drainage water pipes; upgrade wiring equipment for computer technology; enhance nursing/firefighter training; construct, acquire, and equip modern classrooms buildings; improve campus security, shall El Camino Community College District issue $394,516,464 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11927, "fingerprint": "2002|200200224|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200224|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "432b02fcb25fd266", "measure_id": "200200224", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire land to construct additional schools/school facilities to accommodate enrollment growth, increase student safety, repair/upgrade and improve existing elementary schools as necessary including: install perimeter fencing, classroom phones, upgrade electrical wiring and power to accommodate technology, make other improvements to school sites and buildings, and qualify for state matching funds, shall the Saugus Union School District issue $48,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limits with annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4462, "no_votes": 1581, "total_votes": 6043, "percent_yes": 73.83749793149099, "percent_no": 26.162502068509013, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-06-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.969152", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.040380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.790000", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire land to construct additional schools/school facilities to accommodate enrollment growth, increase student safety, repair/upgrade and improve existing elementary schools as necessary including: install perimeter fencing, classroom phones, upgrade electrical wiring and power to accommodate technology, make other improvements to school sites and buildings, and qualify for state matching funds, shall the Saugus Union School District issue $48,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limits with annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9147, "fingerprint": "2002|200200140|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200140|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "92350a75e212e458", "measure_id": "200200140", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to renovate, repair and replace aging educational facilities, including replacement of electrical, plumbing and sewer systems, add classrooms, acquire equipment, construct job training facilities and high tech computer labs, upgrade restrooms, renovate heating and ventilation systems, install fire safety equipment, replace outdated classrooms and libraries and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee, shall the Long Beach Community College District issue $176 million in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34580, "no_votes": 18645, "total_votes": 53225, "percent_yes": 64.96946923438233, "percent_no": 35.03053076561767, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.038395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.788908", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to renovate, repair and replace aging educational facilities, including replacement of electrical, plumbing and sewer systems, add classrooms, acquire equipment, construct job training facilities and high tech computer labs, upgrade restrooms, renovate heating and ventilation systems, install fire safety equipment, replace outdated classrooms and libraries and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee, shall the Long Beach Community College District issue $176 million in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11935, "fingerprint": "2002|200200356|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200356|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d55349a19edd1276", "measure_id": "200200356", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "SPECIAL REORGANIZATION OF THE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY AREA OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Shall the order adopted July 25, 2002, by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors ordering the detachment of the San Fernando Valley area from the City of Los Angeles and the incorporation of the entire detached territory as a general law city be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions, including the establishment of a provisional appropriations limit for the new city of $1.345 billion, the requirement that the new city continue to levy all previously authorized and collected charges, fees, assessments and general or special taxes collected by the City of Los Angeles within the San Fernando Valley area, except as prohibited by law, and that the new city make annual fiscal mitigation payments to the City of Los Angeles of $127,122,000 adjusted for inflation and reduced by 5 percent per year for a total of 20 years, which payments the Local Agency Commission has determined represent the difference between the revenue collected in the San Fernando Valley area by the City of Los Angeles in fiscal year 2000-01 over and above the amount expended by the City of Los Angeles in the San Fernando Valley area in 2000-01, all as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 136737, "no_votes": 132831, "total_votes": 269568, "percent_yes": 50.72449252136752, "percent_no": 49.27550747863248, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.972025", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.046372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.791874", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SPECIAL REORGANIZATION OF THE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY AREA OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Shall the order adopted July 25, 2002, by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors ordering the detachment of the San Fernando Valley area from the City of Los Angeles and the incorporation of the entire detached territory as a general law city be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions, including the establishment of a provisional appropriations limit for the new city of $1.345 billion, the requirement that the new city continue to levy all previously authorized and collected charges, fees, assessments and general or special taxes collected by the City of Los Angeles within the San Fernando Valley area, except as prohibited by law, and that the new city make annual fiscal mitigation payments to the City of Los Angeles of $127,122,000 adjusted for inflation and reduced by 5 percent per year for a total of 20 years, which payments the Local Agency Commission has determined represent the difference between the revenue collected in the San Fernando Valley area by the City of Los Angeles in fiscal year 2000-01 over and above the amount expended by the City of Los Angeles in the San Fernando Valley area in 2000-01, all as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9153, "fingerprint": "2002|200200353|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200353|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d55349a19edd1276", "measure_id": "200200353", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "SPECIAL REORGANIZATION OF THE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY AREA OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Shall the order adopted July 25, 2002, by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors ordering the detachment of the San Fernando Valley area from the City of Los Angeles and the incorporation of the entire detached territory as a general law city be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions, including the establishment of a provisional appropriations limit for the new city of $1.345 billion, the requirement that the new city continue to levy all previously authorized and collected charges, fees, assessments and general or special taxes collected by the City of Los Angeles within the San Fernando Valley area, except as prohibited by law, and that the new city make annual fiscal mitigation payments to the City of Los Angeles of $127,122,000 adjusted for inflation and reduced by 5 percent per year for a total of 20 years, which payments the Local Agency Commission has determined represent the difference between the revenue collected in the San Fernando Valley area by the City of Los Angeles in fiscal year 2000-01 over and above the amount expended by the City of Los Angeles in the San Fernando Valley area in 2000-01, all as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 205550, "no_votes": 416745, "total_votes": 622295, "percent_yes": 33.03095798616411, "percent_no": 66.96904201383589, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.045247", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.791280", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SPECIAL REORGANIZATION OF THE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY AREA OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Shall the order adopted July 25, 2002, by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors ordering the detachment of the San Fernando Valley area from the City of Los Angeles and the incorporation of the entire detached territory as a general law city be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions, including the establishment of a provisional appropriations limit for the new city of $1.345 billion, the requirement that the new city continue to levy all previously authorized and collected charges, fees, assessments and general or special taxes collected by the City of Los Angeles within the San Fernando Valley area, except as prohibited by law, and that the new city make annual fiscal mitigation payments to the City of Los Angeles of $127,122,000 adjusted for inflation and reduced by 5 percent per year for a total of 20 years, which payments the Local Agency Commission has determined represent the difference between the revenue collected in the San Fernando Valley area by the City of Los Angeles in fiscal year 2000-01 over and above the amount expended by the City of Los Angeles in the San Fernando Valley area in 2000-01, all as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9155, "fingerprint": "2002|200200359|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200359|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f8e026dee2aaf28a", "measure_id": "200200359", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter's provisions governing eviction from controlled rental units be amended to extend protections to the spouses, children or domestic partners of tenants who die or become incapacitated, to clarify that the term \"housing service\" includes the number of tenants authorized to occupy a unit, to clarify how rent increases authorized by state law are computed, to clarify the remedies for unlawful attempts to recover possession, to create specified protections against evictions for occupying tenants who replace authorized co-tenants or subtenants, and to require that the Municipal Code contains protections against tenant harassment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17090, "no_votes": 10150, "total_votes": 27240, "percent_yes": 62.73861967694568, "percent_no": 37.26138032305432, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.047285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.792417", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter's provisions governing eviction from controlled rental units be amended to extend protections to the spouses, children or domestic partners of tenants who die or become incapacitated, to clarify that the term \"housing service\" includes the number of tenants authorized to occupy a unit, to clarify how rent increases authorized by state law are computed, to clarify the remedies for unlawful attempts to recover possession, to create specified protections against evictions for occupying tenants who replace authorized co-tenants or subtenants, and to require that the Municipal Code contains protections against tenant harassment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9146, "fingerprint": "2002|200200139|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200139|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "81f2bda23f4a7cb8", "measure_id": "200200139", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Glendale Community College District, in order to increase educational opportunities and reduce campus overcrowding, construct new classrooms, job training facilities, renovate existing instructional buildings, add parking, improve energy efficiency, telecommunications and technology infrastructure, and acquire property for future instructional needs, issue $98 million in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, with citizens' oversight, independent audits, no proceeds for employees' salaries and all funds staying in our community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14245, "no_votes": 10262, "total_votes": 24507, "percent_yes": 58.12624964295915, "percent_no": 41.87375035704085, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.038088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.788720", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Glendale Community College District, in order to increase educational opportunities and reduce campus overcrowding, construct new classrooms, job training facilities, renovate existing instructional buildings, add parking, improve energy efficiency, telecommunications and technology infrastructure, and acquire property for future instructional needs, issue $98 million in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, with citizens' oversight, independent audits, no proceeds for employees' salaries and all funds staying in our community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9156, "fingerprint": "2002|200200360|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200360|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ae6523029a02cf5d", "measure_id": "200200360", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to increase Rent Control Board members' compensation from $75 to $150 per meeting, with a limit of $6,000 per year, and to provide that they shall receive health care benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10785, "no_votes": 16538, "total_votes": 27323, "percent_yes": 39.47223950517878, "percent_no": 60.52776049482122, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.047587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.792604", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to increase Rent Control Board members' compensation from $75 to $150 per meeting, with a limit of $6,000 per year, and to provide that they shall receive health care benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11934, "fingerprint": "2002|200200355|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200355|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "39b295a45cdb2314", "measure_id": "200200355", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "SPECIAL REORGANIZATION OF THE HOLLYWOOD AREA OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Shall the order adopted July 26, 2002, by the Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering the detachment of Hollywood from the City of Los Angeles and the incorporation of the entire detached territory as a general law city be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions, including the establishment of a provisional appropriations limit for the new city of $214.3 million, the requirement that the new city continue to levy all previously authorized and collected charges, fees, assessments and general or special taxes collected by the City of Los Angeles within the Hollywood area, except as prohibited by law, and that the new city make annual fiscal mitigation payments to the City of Los Angeles of $21,320,000 adjusted for inflation and reduced by 5 percent per year for a total of 20 years, which payments the Local Agency Formation Commission has determined represent the difference between the revenue collected in the Hollywood area by the City of Los Angeles in fiscal year 2000-01 over and above the amount expended by the City of Los Angeles in the Hollywood area in 2000-01, all as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8982, "no_votes": 19570, "total_votes": 28552, "percent_yes": 31.458391706360324, "percent_no": 68.54160829363968, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.971771", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.046022", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.791662", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SPECIAL REORGANIZATION OF THE HOLLYWOOD AREA OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Shall the order adopted July 26, 2002, by the Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering the detachment of Hollywood from the City of Los Angeles and the incorporation of the entire detached territory as a general law city be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions, including the establishment of a provisional appropriations limit for the new city of $214.3 million, the requirement that the new city continue to levy all previously authorized and collected charges, fees, assessments and general or special taxes collected by the City of Los Angeles within the Hollywood area, except as prohibited by law, and that the new city make annual fiscal mitigation payments to the City of Los Angeles of $21,320,000 adjusted for inflation and reduced by 5 percent per year for a total of 20 years, which payments the Local Agency Formation Commission has determined represent the difference between the revenue collected in the Hollywood area by the City of Los Angeles in fiscal year 2000-01 over and above the amount expended by the City of Los Angeles in the Hollywood area in 2000-01, all as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9154, "fingerprint": "2002|200200354|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200354|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "39b295a45cdb2314", "measure_id": "200200354", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "SPECIAL REORGANIZATION OF THE HOLLYWOOD AREA OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Shall the order adopted July 26, 2002, by the Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering the detachment of Hollywood from the City of Los Angeles and the incorporation of the entire detached territory as a general law city be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions, including the establishment of a provisional appropriations limit for the new city of $214.3 million, the requirement that the new city continue to levy all previously authorized and collected charges, fees, assessments and general or special taxes collected by the City of Los Angeles within the Hollywood area, except as prohibited by law, and that the new city make annual fiscal mitigation payments to the City of Los Angeles of $21,320,000 adjusted for inflation and reduced by 5 percent per year for a total of 20 years, which payments the Local Agency Formation Commission has determined represent the difference between the revenue collected in the Hollywood area by the City of Los Angeles in fiscal year 2000-01 over and above the amount expended by the City of Los Angeles in the Hollywood area in 2000-01, all as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 168522, "no_votes": 421114, "total_votes": 589636, "percent_yes": 28.58068367603064, "percent_no": 71.41931632396935, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.045704", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.791467", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SPECIAL REORGANIZATION OF THE HOLLYWOOD AREA OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. Shall the order adopted July 26, 2002, by the Local Agency Formation Commission, ordering the detachment of Hollywood from the City of Los Angeles and the incorporation of the entire detached territory as a general law city be confirmed, subject to such terms and conditions, including the establishment of a provisional appropriations limit for the new city of $214.3 million, the requirement that the new city continue to levy all previously authorized and collected charges, fees, assessments and general or special taxes collected by the City of Los Angeles within the Hollywood area, except as prohibited by law, and that the new city make annual fiscal mitigation payments to the City of Los Angeles of $21,320,000 adjusted for inflation and reduced by 5 percent per year for a total of 20 years, which payments the Local Agency Formation Commission has determined represent the difference between the revenue collected in the Hollywood area by the City of Los Angeles in fiscal year 2000-01 over and above the amount expended by the City of Los Angeles in the Hollywood area in 2000-01, all as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9157, "fingerprint": "2002|200200361|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200361|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bf890bcdf753adf2", "measure_id": "200200361", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter and Municipal Code be amended to change the system of electing City Council members by creating City Council districts, imposing term limits for Council members, and establishing a municipal primary election with runoffs in the fall, to add to the seven-member Council a mayor, who would be elected citywide and would serve as the Council's non-voting chairperson, and to change the process for Council actions by giving the mayor the power to veto Council actions, including emergency actions, which veto could be nullified if a specified number of Council members vote to override it?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9732, "no_votes": 17410, "total_votes": 27142, "percent_yes": 35.85586913270945, "percent_no": 64.14413086729056, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.047864", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.792800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter and Municipal Code be amended to change the system of electing City Council members by creating City Council districts, imposing term limits for Council members, and establishing a municipal primary election with runoffs in the fall, to add to the seven-member Council a mayor, who would be elected citywide and would serve as the Council's non-voting chairperson, and to change the process for Council actions by giving the mayor the power to veto Council actions, including emergency actions, which veto could be nullified if a specified number of Council members vote to override it?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11941, "fingerprint": "2002|200200549|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200549|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "177436ea970d080f", "measure_id": "200200549", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To furnish, equip and upgrade facilities in the Compton Unified School District, to make necessary health and safety improvements to benefit all students and to provide competitive educational programs, shall the Compton Unified School District issue up to $80,000,000 of bonds at an interest rate within applicable legal limits to construct, repair and improve facilities at elementary, middle, high and day schools District-wide?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14150, "no_votes": 2886, "total_votes": 17036, "percent_yes": 83.05940361587227, "percent_no": 16.94059638412773, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.975106", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.051840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.794648", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To furnish, equip and upgrade facilities in the Compton Unified School District, to make necessary health and safety improvements to benefit all students and to provide competitive educational programs, shall the Compton Unified School District issue up to $80,000,000 of bonds at an interest rate within applicable legal limits to construct, repair and improve facilities at elementary, middle, high and day schools District-wide?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9143, "fingerprint": "2002|200200136|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200136|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f2569ce3e5e99d14", "measure_id": "200200136", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve, repair, replace, and renovate aging neighborhood schools, relieve overcrowding, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Azusa Unified School District issue $75,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance the renovation, construction, acquisition and improvement of local school facilities and land, including replacing outdated water, lighting, electrical and sewer systems, building classrooms and replacing portable classrooms, with annual audits, no proceeds for administrators' salaries, and a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4200, "no_votes": 1424, "total_votes": 5624, "percent_yes": 74.67994310099573, "percent_no": 25.32005689900427, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.037150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.788085", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve, repair, replace, and renovate aging neighborhood schools, relieve overcrowding, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Azusa Unified School District issue $75,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance the renovation, construction, acquisition and improvement of local school facilities and land, including replacing outdated water, lighting, electrical and sewer systems, building classrooms and replacing portable classrooms, with annual audits, no proceeds for administrators' salaries, and a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9158, "fingerprint": "2002|200200362|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200362|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ae04a5cca3e108e1", "measure_id": "200200362", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to establish procedures for converting apartment buildings, trailer park and other rental housing to condominiums or other common ownership housing, which would be exempt from certain planning and zoning laws, and procedures for allowing tenants to either become owners or continue as tenants with specified rights and protections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9845, "no_votes": 17627, "total_votes": 27472, "percent_yes": 35.83648806057076, "percent_no": 64.16351193942924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.048212", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.792992", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to establish procedures for converting apartment buildings, trailer park and other rental housing to condominiums or other common ownership housing, which would be exempt from certain planning and zoning laws, and procedures for allowing tenants to either become owners or continue as tenants with specified rights and protections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11943, "fingerprint": "2002|200200553|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200553|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dd81acf8e05a070f", "measure_id": "200200553", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Hermosa Beach City School District be authorized to finance classroom modernization; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to technology; make health, safety, and security improvements; upgrade plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; construct classrooms and science labs; acquire property, and qualify for State funds up to $1,700,000, by issuing $13,600,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3874, "no_votes": 2070, "total_votes": 5944, "percent_yes": 65.1749663526245, "percent_no": 34.825033647375506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.975911", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.053966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.795377", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Hermosa Beach City School District be authorized to finance classroom modernization; upgrade electrical systems to improve access to technology; make health, safety, and security improvements; upgrade plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; construct classrooms and science labs; acquire property, and qualify for State funds up to $1,700,000, by issuing $13,600,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9150, "fingerprint": "2002|200200143|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200143|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4cfeb7011cc42b3e", "measure_id": "200200143", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, provide greater security and safety, and improve technology, shall the Pomona Unified School District issue $68 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to repair, build, acquire, and equip new and existing schools throughout the District so long as no funds are used for administrative salaries and the spending of bonds is reviewed by an independent citizen oversight committee as required by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7280, "no_votes": 4322, "total_votes": 11602, "percent_yes": 62.74780210308567, "percent_no": 37.25219789691433, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.039431", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.789450", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, provide greater security and safety, and improve technology, shall the Pomona Unified School District issue $68 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to repair, build, acquire, and equip new and existing schools throughout the District so long as no funds are used for administrative salaries and the spending of bonds is reviewed by an independent citizen oversight committee as required by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9159, "fingerprint": "2002|200200363|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200363|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5878739ac7b8e5b6", "measure_id": "200200363", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2015 (CCS) establishing local minimum wage requirements, initially set at $10.50 per hour with health care benefits, or at $12.25 per hour without health care benefits, applicable to the City, its service contractors, and private businesses, which are located in the coastal and downtown areas and have gross annual receipts over $5 million, and establishing an exemption for businesses which show severe economic hardship, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13860, "no_votes": 14830, "total_votes": 28690, "percent_yes": 48.30951551063088, "percent_no": 51.69048448936912, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.048521", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.793179", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2015 (CCS) establishing local minimum wage requirements, initially set at $10.50 per hour with health care benefits, or at $12.25 per hour without health care benefits, applicable to the City, its service contractors, and private businesses, which are located in the coastal and downtown areas and have gross annual receipts over $5 million, and establishing an exemption for businesses which show severe economic hardship, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11944, "fingerprint": "2002|200200554|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200554|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d3e2d8f571fa65d0", "measure_id": "200200554", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "SAFE HEALTHY NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS: To improve local schools and relieve classroom overcrowding, shall Los Angeles Unified School District repair, renovate, acquire, lease school buildings, classrooms, libraries, restrooms, science laboratories, capital projects; upgrade fire security systems, earthquake retrofitting, lighting, heating; acquire library books; eliminate hazards of asbestos, lead paint; upgrade wiring for computers; build neighborhood schools by issuing $3.35 billion in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual fiscal audits, citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 488849, "no_votes": 229181, "total_votes": 718030, "percent_yes": 68.0819742907678, "percent_no": 31.918025709232197, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.976108", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.054393", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.795561", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAFE HEALTHY NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS: To improve local schools and relieve classroom overcrowding, shall Los Angeles Unified School District repair, renovate, acquire, lease school buildings, classrooms, libraries, restrooms, science laboratories, capital projects; upgrade fire security systems, earthquake retrofitting, lighting, heating; acquire library books; eliminate hazards of asbestos, lead paint; upgrade wiring for computers; build neighborhood schools by issuing $3.35 billion in bonds, at legal interest rates, with guaranteed annual fiscal audits, citizens' oversight committee, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9144, "fingerprint": "2002|200200137|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200137|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "181c7f5cd4d583e8", "measure_id": "200200137", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade and improve all Beverly Hills Unified School District Schools, construct additional classrooms, science/computer classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, qualify for state grants if possible, address building safety/health issues including: upgrade electrical wiring/power, repair/upgrade deteriorating restrooms/plumbing/HVAC and make other improvements to school sites and buildings, shall the District issue $90,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with annual audits and citizens' oversight.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4424, "no_votes": 1235, "total_votes": 5659, "percent_yes": 78.1763562466867, "percent_no": 21.823643753313306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.037443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.788267", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade and improve all Beverly Hills Unified School District Schools, construct additional classrooms, science/computer classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, qualify for state grants if possible, address building safety/health issues including: upgrade electrical wiring/power, repair/upgrade deteriorating restrooms/plumbing/HVAC and make other improvements to school sites and buildings, shall the District issue $90,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with annual audits and citizens' oversight.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9160, "fingerprint": "2002|200200364|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200364|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "aaec9e023f9ff10d", "measure_id": "200200364", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to eliminate the restriction on the percentage of TORCA tax revenues that can be used to develop or subsidize low income housing so that any portion of the TORCA revenues, except those used for administrative costs, can be used for low income housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12989, "no_votes": 12708, "total_votes": 25697, "percent_yes": 50.54675643071176, "percent_no": 49.45324356928824, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.048807", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.793362", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to eliminate the restriction on the percentage of TORCA tax revenues that can be used to develop or subsidize low income housing so that any portion of the TORCA revenues, except those used for administrative costs, can be used for low income housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11930, "fingerprint": "2002|200200349|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200349|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b94c77089c56f58f", "measure_id": "200200349", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure L, increasing the tax fees to the transient occupancy tax from 7% to 11% and clarifying the intent thereof and effective 1/01/03, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4627, "no_votes": 4132, "total_votes": 8759, "percent_yes": 52.8256650302546, "percent_no": 47.1743349697454, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.969964", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.043698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.790551", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure L, increasing the tax fees to the transient occupancy tax from 7% to 11% and clarifying the intent thereof and effective 1/01/03, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9136, "fingerprint": "2002|200200053|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200053|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8c000aeedcebefb0", "measure_id": "200200053", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance prohibiting the storage, sale, use or discharge of fireworks within the City of Downey be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5769, "no_votes": 6745, "total_votes": 12514, "percent_yes": 46.1003675883011, "percent_no": 53.8996324116989, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.034572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.786636", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance prohibiting the storage, sale, use or discharge of fireworks within the City of Downey be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11948, "fingerprint": "2002|200200559|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200559|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f6d78147d71b2183", "measure_id": "200200559", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the South Pasadena School District repair and equip South Pasadena Middle School; relieve overcrowding; improve student safety condition; upgrade electrical wiring for technology; install efficient heating/cooling/fire safety systems; replace aging plumbing; modernize science labs; repair/construct/acquire/equip classrooms/facilities at school sites; qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $29,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates; and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5754, "no_votes": 1623, "total_votes": 7377, "percent_yes": 77.99918666124441, "percent_no": 22.00081333875559, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.977120", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.055927", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.796480", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the South Pasadena School District repair and equip South Pasadena Middle School; relieve overcrowding; improve student safety condition; upgrade electrical wiring for technology; install efficient heating/cooling/fire safety systems; replace aging plumbing; modernize science labs; repair/construct/acquire/equip classrooms/facilities at school sites; qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $29,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates; and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9137, "fingerprint": "2002|200200054|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200054|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dd2668edc92bf9dd", "measure_id": "200200054", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall John Harrold be recalled (removed) from the Office of Member of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6473, "no_votes": 6261, "total_votes": 12734, "percent_yes": 50.8324171509345, "percent_no": 49.1675828490655, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.034896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.786816", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall John Harrold be recalled (removed) from the Office of Member of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11931, "fingerprint": "2002|200200350|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200350|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d282ff3f8e849b73", "measure_id": "200200350", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 920-02 be adopted, to do the following: repeal in its entirety Chapter 2.74 of the Lawndale Municipal Code, which prohibits the redevelopment agency from using its power of eminent domain to acquire property which is zoned for residential purposes or developed with residential structures of 4 units or less? And (2) Shall the City Council be directed to amend the General Plan to permit the use of eminent domain to eliminate blight only in commercial and industrial, but not residential zones, within the redevelopment project area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1419, "no_votes": 2148, "total_votes": 3567, "percent_yes": 39.78132884777123, "percent_no": 60.21867115222877, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.970234", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.044068", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.790736", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 920-02 be adopted, to do the following: repeal in its entirety Chapter 2.74 of the Lawndale Municipal Code, which prohibits the redevelopment agency from using its power of eminent domain to acquire property which is zoned for residential purposes or developed with residential structures of 4 units or less? And (2) Shall the City Council be directed to amend the General Plan to permit the use of eminent domain to eliminate blight only in commercial and industrial, but not residential zones, within the redevelopment project area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9138, "fingerprint": "2002|200200055|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200055|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "70c08db122039e50", "measure_id": "200200055", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Richard Jacobs be recalled (removed) from the Office of Member of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6556, "no_votes": 6127, "total_votes": 12683, "percent_yes": 51.69124024284475, "percent_no": 48.30875975715525, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.035213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.786996", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Richard Jacobs be recalled (removed) from the Office of Member of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11937, "fingerprint": "2002|200200358|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200358|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "47558f67085d9597", "measure_id": "200200358", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 0-02-1162 continuing the Special Public Safety Tax for police, paramedic and fire services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3308, "no_votes": 831, "total_votes": 4139, "percent_yes": 79.92268663928486, "percent_no": 20.077313360715138, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.972422", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.046965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.792237", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 0-02-1162 continuing the Special Public Safety Tax for police, paramedic and fire services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9139, "fingerprint": "2002|200200056|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200056|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4a085ef6189abdc0", "measure_id": "200200056", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Paul Marshall be recalled (removed) from the Office of Member of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6365, "no_votes": 6293, "total_votes": 12658, "percent_yes": 50.28440511929215, "percent_no": 49.71559488070785, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.035511", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.787175", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Paul Marshall be recalled (removed) from the Office of Member of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11936, "fingerprint": "2002|200200357|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200357|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8148d5bf8ce33b2f", "measure_id": "200200357", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent reductions in City's General Fund, shall the existing Utility Users Tax of 5% on all utilities except water, adopted in 1992 and amended in 1993, be affirmed and ratified with the adoption of this ordinance, provided that those low-income persons eligible to participate in utility discount programs remain exempt and the tax be subject to an annual review to determine need for continuing it.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6799, "no_votes": 3745, "total_votes": 10544, "percent_yes": 64.48216995447648, "percent_no": 35.517830045523525, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.972225", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.046660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.792057", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent reductions in City's General Fund, shall the existing Utility Users Tax of 5% on all utilities except water, adopted in 1992 and amended in 1993, be affirmed and ratified with the adoption of this ordinance, provided that those low-income persons eligible to participate in utility discount programs remain exempt and the tax be subject to an annual review to determine need for continuing it.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9149, "fingerprint": "2002|200200142|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200142|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e4cc63f6f357254f", "measure_id": "200200142", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Pasadena Area Community College District repair and rehabilitate its facilities to meet current health, safety, accessibility and instructional standards, replace worn-out plumbing, upgrade existing electrical systems to better access technology, replacing aging heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems, renovate outdated classrooms and other vocational training facilities, and construct other facilities to relieve overcrowding, by issuing $150 million in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to oversee expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39129, "no_votes": 16895, "total_votes": 56024, "percent_yes": 69.8432814508068, "percent_no": 30.1567185491932, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.039040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.789269", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pasadena Area Community College District repair and rehabilitate its facilities to meet current health, safety, accessibility and instructional standards, replace worn-out plumbing, upgrade existing electrical systems to better access technology, replacing aging heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems, renovate outdated classrooms and other vocational training facilities, and construct other facilities to relieve overcrowding, by issuing $150 million in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to oversee expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11939, "fingerprint": "2002|200200546|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200546|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "05673fbf56436927", "measure_id": "200200546", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a permanent high school and qualify our community for State matching funds, shall Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District issue $21,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with all funds staying in our community to provide permanent classrooms, a library, modern science and computer labs, technology, student restrooms and core high school facilities, with an independent Citizens Oversight Committee, annual financial and performance audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1621, "no_votes": 1953, "total_votes": 3574, "percent_yes": 45.35534415221041, "percent_no": 54.64465584778959, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.974507", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.050286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.794101", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a permanent high school and qualify our community for State matching funds, shall Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District issue $21,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with all funds staying in our community to provide permanent classrooms, a library, modern science and computer labs, technology, student restrooms and core high school facilities, with an independent Citizens Oversight Committee, annual financial and performance audits, and no money for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9140, "fingerprint": "2002|200200057|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200057|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "44ff07f364fe6e33", "measure_id": "200200057", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "911 POLICE-FIRE-PARAMEDIC CITYWIDE SECURITY GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS. To improve 911 reliability and response time, create an earthquake-resistant Emergency Operation/Dispatch Complex coordinating fire, paramedic and police; repair fire and police stations citywide; build six police stations citywide and two bomb squad facilities in strategic locations; with independent financial audits and a citizens oversight committee ensuring budget, schedule and project commitments; shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness of $600,000,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 231180, "no_votes": 114653, "total_votes": 345833, "percent_yes": 66.84729334678877, "percent_no": 33.152706653211226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.035806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.787354", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "911 POLICE-FIRE-PARAMEDIC CITYWIDE SECURITY GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS. To improve 911 reliability and response time, create an earthquake-resistant Emergency Operation/Dispatch Complex coordinating fire, paramedic and police; repair fire and police stations citywide; build six police stations citywide and two bomb squad facilities in strategic locations; with independent financial audits and a citizens oversight committee ensuring budget, schedule and project commitments; shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness of $600,000,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11947, "fingerprint": "2002|200200557|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200557|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d4c87788a8bf9882", "measure_id": "200200557", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs and four-year colleges and train nurses, police and firefighters by: repairing aging buildings, classrooms, laboratories; expanding nursing, police, and firefighter training centers; removing asbestos; upgrading earthquake/fire safety and campus security; repairing leaky roofs, plumbing, air conditioning; upgrading wiring for computer technology, shall Rio Hondo Community College District issue $194.6 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31913, "no_votes": 28674, "total_votes": 60587, "percent_yes": 52.67301566342615, "percent_no": 47.32698433657385, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.976709", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.055350", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.796113", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs and four-year colleges and train nurses, police and firefighters by: repairing aging buildings, classrooms, laboratories; expanding nursing, police, and firefighter training centers; removing asbestos; upgrading earthquake/fire safety and campus security; repairing leaky roofs, plumbing, air conditioning; upgrading wiring for computer technology, shall Rio Hondo Community College District issue $194.6 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with guaranteed annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11926, "fingerprint": "2002|200200059|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200059|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "493befc6a5c503e4", "measure_id": "200200059", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHANGING THE CITY DATES OF CITY ELECTIONS. Should the Los Angeles City Charter be amended to change the date of the City's primary nominating election to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of every odd-numbered year and the date of the City's general municipal election to the third Tuesday in May of those years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 179665, "no_votes": 138728, "total_votes": 318393, "percent_yes": 56.42869032924719, "percent_no": 43.57130967075281, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.966368", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.036416", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.787719", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHANGING THE CITY DATES OF CITY ELECTIONS. Should the Los Angeles City Charter be amended to change the date of the City's primary nominating election to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of every odd-numbered year and the date of the City's general municipal election to the third Tuesday in May of those years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9141, "fingerprint": "2002|200200058|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200058|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "493befc6a5c503e4", "measure_id": "200200058", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHANGING THE CITY DATES OF CITY ELECTIONS. Should the Los Angeles City Charter be amended to change the date of the City's primary nominating election to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of every odd-numbered year and the date of the City's general municipal election to the third Tuesday in May of those years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28931, "no_votes": 21981, "total_votes": 50912, "percent_yes": 56.8255028284098, "percent_no": 43.1744971715902, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.036104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.787538", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHANGING THE CITY DATES OF CITY ELECTIONS. Should the Los Angeles City Charter be amended to change the date of the City's primary nominating election to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of every odd-numbered year and the date of the City's general municipal election to the third Tuesday in May of those years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11946, "fingerprint": "2002|200200556|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200556|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ea62e68080a2da9c", "measure_id": "200200556", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "SCHOOL SAFETY AND REPAIR BOND MEASURE. Shall the Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District relieve overcrowding; repair, upgrade, construct, acquire, equip neighborhood schools/classrooms; install fire safety equipment, emergency lighting, energy efficient heating/cooling systems, fire doors; replace out dated plumbing/sewer and decayed drainage systems, leaking, rundown roofs/bathrooms; upgrade electrical wiring for technology; improve student safety conditions; and qualify for State funds by issuing $165,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14949, "no_votes": 5364, "total_votes": 20313, "percent_yes": 73.59326539654408, "percent_no": 26.406734603455916, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.976502", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.055036", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.795927", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SCHOOL SAFETY AND REPAIR BOND MEASURE. Shall the Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District relieve overcrowding; repair, upgrade, construct, acquire, equip neighborhood schools/classrooms; install fire safety equipment, emergency lighting, energy efficient heating/cooling systems, fire doors; replace out dated plumbing/sewer and decayed drainage systems, leaking, rundown roofs/bathrooms; upgrade electrical wiring for technology; improve student safety conditions; and qualify for State funds by issuing $165,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, requiring annual audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9151, "fingerprint": "2002|200200144|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200144|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "24be5a94dcc1a104", "measure_id": "200200144", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize 45-year old elementary/middle schools, deteriorating roofs, walls, electrical, heating and plumbing systems; build new classrooms, improve safety by eliminating asbestos, traffic hazards; improve learning/reduce overcrowding with new classrooms, modern libraries, computer and science labs; construct, repair, acquire and equip classrooms and facilities, shall San Gabriel Unified School District issue $45,045,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee, perform annual audits, with no money used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3411, "no_votes": 1456, "total_votes": 4867, "percent_yes": 70.08424080542429, "percent_no": 29.915759194575713, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.039730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.789633", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize 45-year old elementary/middle schools, deteriorating roofs, walls, electrical, heating and plumbing systems; build new classrooms, improve safety by eliminating asbestos, traffic hazards; improve learning/reduce overcrowding with new classrooms, modern libraries, computer and science labs; construct, repair, acquire and equip classrooms and facilities, shall San Gabriel Unified School District issue $45,045,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee, perform annual audits, with no money used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11932, "fingerprint": "2002|200200351|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200351|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "559dcd0225db76fd", "measure_id": "200200351", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure T, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by changing the name of the Recreation Commission to the Parks and Recreation Commission, and modifying the Commission's jurisdiction to include all activities on and use of park lands in the City, be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39705, "no_votes": 27583, "total_votes": 67288, "percent_yes": 59.00754963737962, "percent_no": 40.99245036262038, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.970501", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.044379", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.790917", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure T, which amends the Long Beach City Charter by changing the name of the Recreation Commission to the Parks and Recreation Commission, and modifying the Commission's jurisdiction to include all activities on and use of park lands in the City, be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9135, "fingerprint": "2002|200200052|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200052|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b8e96a10d4b8fa9c", "measure_id": "200200052", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance requiring the City of Carson to allow multiple solid waste collectors to operate in the City, limiting the City Council's authority to increase residential solid waste collection rates, imposing and amending various taxes, fees, and regulations of the City relating to solid waste collection, and making amendments to the Carson Municipal Code and other City documents, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3122, "no_votes": 6253, "total_votes": 9375, "percent_yes": 33.301333333333325, "percent_no": 66.69866666666667, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.034244", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.786451", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance requiring the City of Carson to allow multiple solid waste collectors to operate in the City, limiting the City Council's authority to increase residential solid waste collection rates, imposing and amending various taxes, fees, and regulations of the City relating to solid waste collection, and making amendments to the Carson Municipal Code and other City documents, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11933, "fingerprint": "2002|200200352|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200352|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "06adc7e450ffe265", "measure_id": "200200352", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure U, which amends the Long Beach City Charter (currently providing a one percent preference in bidding by local businesses) to permit the City Council to set the amount of such preference by ordinance, be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32646, "no_votes": 30060, "total_votes": 62706, "percent_yes": 52.062003636015696, "percent_no": 47.937996363984304, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.970781", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.044680", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.791098", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure U, which amends the Long Beach City Charter (currently providing a one percent preference in bidding by local businesses) to permit the City Council to set the amount of such preference by ordinance, be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9152, "fingerprint": "2002|200200145|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200145|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0ee2c9b7869e820b", "measure_id": "200200145", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Santa Monica Community College District increase educational opportunities and raise student achievement; replace or repair deteriorating buildings and related facilities; construct, furnish, and equip classrooms, laboratories, learning resources, and related facilities; upgrade computer technology and energy saving equipment; improve campus safety, fire security, parking and lighting; improve or acquire real property; and complete earthquake retrofitting by issuing, at interest rates within legal limits, $160 million in bonds with citizens' oversight and annual performance and financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13540, "no_votes": 5807, "total_votes": 19347, "percent_yes": 69.98501059595803, "percent_no": 30.01498940404197, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.040037", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.789819", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Santa Monica Community College District increase educational opportunities and raise student achievement; replace or repair deteriorating buildings and related facilities; construct, furnish, and equip classrooms, laboratories, learning resources, and related facilities; upgrade computer technology and energy saving equipment; improve campus safety, fire security, parking and lighting; improve or acquire real property; and complete earthquake retrofitting by issuing, at interest rates within legal limits, $160 million in bonds with citizens' oversight and annual performance and financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11938, "fingerprint": "2002|200200366|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200366|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "473f9015ae8a61ce", "measure_id": "200200366", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the City give priority to funding these services and programs: increasing literacy by building a new library with the state paying two-thirds of the cost; strengthening public safety and emergency preparedness by constructing a new police facility and filling vacant public safety positions; improving streets, access to city facilities for senior and people with disabilities, after-school programs and other vital city services; and maintaining adequate reserves to address catastrophic events?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10115, "no_votes": 7631, "total_votes": 17746, "percent_yes": 56.99876028400767, "percent_no": 43.00123971599233, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.974101", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.049386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.793731", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the City give priority to funding these services and programs: increasing literacy by building a new library with the state paying two-thirds of the cost; strengthening public safety and emergency preparedness by constructing a new police facility and filling vacant public safety positions; improving streets, access to city facilities for senior and people with disabilities, after-school programs and other vital city services; and maintaining adequate reserves to address catastrophic events?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9142, "fingerprint": "2002|200200135|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200135|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ab6a35bed6eaead2", "measure_id": "200200135", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance learning and student safety by reducing overcrowded local high schools; construct, acquire and equip new high schools, additional classrooms and facilities; renovate and modernize existing schools, upgrade classroom technology and science labs; and qualify for State matching funds, shall Antelope Valley Union High School District issue $103,600,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to maintain strict financial accountability, prevent waste and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or other administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19029, "no_votes": 14225, "total_votes": 33254, "percent_yes": 57.22319119504421, "percent_no": 42.77680880495579, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.036752", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.787901", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance learning and student safety by reducing overcrowded local high schools; construct, acquire and equip new high schools, additional classrooms and facilities; renovate and modernize existing schools, upgrade classroom technology and science labs; and qualify for State matching funds, shall Antelope Valley Union High School District issue $103,600,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to maintain strict financial accountability, prevent waste and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or other administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9162, "fingerprint": "2002|200200367|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200367|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "484072210da14bcc", "measure_id": "200200367", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2811 be approved to increase the existing utility user tax from 5% on all utilities, as established by the City in 1970, to 7.5% on all utilities for the funding of general city services and programs and to ratify Ordinance No. 2804 enacted May 28, 2002?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5672, "no_votes": 11600, "total_votes": 17272, "percent_yes": 32.83927744326076, "percent_no": 67.16072255673924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.049830", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.793917", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2811 be approved to increase the existing utility user tax from 5% on all utilities, as established by the City in 1970, to 7.5% on all utilities for the funding of general city services and programs and to ratify Ordinance No. 2804 enacted May 28, 2002?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9148, "fingerprint": "2002|200200141|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200141|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "010967f5585352ca", "measure_id": "200200141", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Fullerton and Cypress College students for jobs and four-year colleges; relieve student overcrowding; upgrade electrical wiring for advanced technology training and lighting for student safety; expand parking facilities; qualify for state matching funds; construct/acquire/modernize/equip facilities, classrooms and sites; shall North Orange County Community College District issue $239,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1957, "no_votes": 1582, "total_votes": 3539, "percent_yes": 55.29810680983329, "percent_no": 44.70189319016671, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.038736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.789088", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Fullerton and Cypress College students for jobs and four-year colleges; relieve student overcrowding; upgrade electrical wiring for advanced technology training and lighting for student safety; expand parking facilities; qualify for state matching funds; construct/acquire/modernize/equip facilities, classrooms and sites; shall North Orange County Community College District issue $239,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9165, "fingerprint": "2002|200200552|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200552|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "54b46429f2d76c40", "measure_id": "200200552", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce overcrowding and to provide safety upgrades, shall El Monte Union High School District repair and renovate aging area high schools; install energy efficient heating/cooling systems; replace old, deteriorating portables with permanent classrooms; upgrade electrical capacity and technology infrastructure; repair leaky roofs and plumbing; improve, acquire and construct school classrooms, libraries, sites and facilities; and qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $90,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, and no money for staff salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13584, "no_votes": 4231, "total_votes": 17815, "percent_yes": 76.25035082795397, "percent_no": 23.749649172046034, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.053501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.795196", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce overcrowding and to provide safety upgrades, shall El Monte Union High School District repair and renovate aging area high schools; install energy efficient heating/cooling systems; replace old, deteriorating portables with permanent classrooms; upgrade electrical capacity and technology infrastructure; repair leaky roofs and plumbing; improve, acquire and construct school classrooms, libraries, sites and facilities; and qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $90,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight, and no money for staff salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9161, "fingerprint": "2002|200200365|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200365|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "60744daa2cce7382", "measure_id": "200200365", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter of the City of Signal Hill be amended to provide that the City Treasurer is appointed by the City Council to be a City employee instead of elected by the people?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 685, "no_votes": 1125, "total_votes": 1810, "percent_yes": 37.84530386740331, "percent_no": 62.15469613259669, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.049080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.793549", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter of the City of Signal Hill be amended to provide that the City Treasurer is appointed by the City Council to be a City employee instead of elected by the people?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9167, "fingerprint": "2002|200200251|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200251|MADERA", "content_hash": "a92600904a6e373b", "measure_id": "200200251", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a 1/2 percent sales tax be collected on transactions within the incorporated cities and unincorporated areas of Madera County, for a period of 20 years beginning October 1, 2005, with expenditures for transportation improvements only as follows: 72% road rehabilitation and maintenance, 20% construction, 5% (maximum) transit, 3% (maximum) bicycle and pedestrian?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12794, "no_votes": 12471, "total_votes": 25265, "percent_yes": 50.639224223233725, "percent_no": 49.360775776766275, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.056227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.796667", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a 1/2 percent sales tax be collected on transactions within the incorporated cities and unincorporated areas of Madera County, for a period of 20 years beginning October 1, 2005, with expenditures for transportation improvements only as follows: 72% road rehabilitation and maintenance, 20% construction, 5% (maximum) transit, 3% (maximum) bicycle and pedestrian?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9169, "fingerprint": "2002|200200560|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200560|MADERA", "content_hash": "a9525525a9b6968b", "measure_id": "200200560", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding and improve educational opportunities for Madera Unified students by building classrooms to finish the High School's South campus, repair and renovate North campus, and build new elementary schools, shall Madera Unified issue $46 million of bonds, qualifying the district for state matching funds, and appoint a citizen's oversight committee to ensure funds are spent for school improvements and repairs and not used for salaries, administration or overhead?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6812, "no_votes": 3917, "total_votes": 10729, "percent_yes": 63.491471712181934, "percent_no": 36.508528287818066, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.056841", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.797032", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding and improve educational opportunities for Madera Unified students by building classrooms to finish the High School's South campus, repair and renovate North campus, and build new elementary schools, shall Madera Unified issue $46 million of bonds, qualifying the district for state matching funds, and appoint a citizen's oversight committee to ensure funds are spent for school improvements and repairs and not used for salaries, administration or overhead?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9168, "fingerprint": "2002|200200252|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200252|MADERA", "content_hash": "c69b22771b6a957b", "measure_id": "200200252", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "EXCLUDED COUNTY EMPLOYEES. Shall the County's Civil Service System Ordinance be amended to provide that all attorneys in the Office of the County Counsel not otherwise exempt from civil service, any Deputy Director of the County Resource Management Agency and any Undersheriff employed by the County of Madera after the effective date of the amendment to the Civil Service System Ordinance be excluded from the County's Civil Service System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7822, "no_votes": 15118, "total_votes": 22940, "percent_yes": 34.097646033129905, "percent_no": 65.9023539668701, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.056531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.796851", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EXCLUDED COUNTY EMPLOYEES. Shall the County's Civil Service System Ordinance be amended to provide that all attorneys in the Office of the County Counsel not otherwise exempt from civil service, any Deputy Director of the County Resource Management Agency and any Undersheriff employed by the County of Madera after the effective date of the amendment to the Civil Service System Ordinance be excluded from the County's Civil Service System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9171, "fingerprint": "2002|200200562|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200562|MADERA", "content_hash": "7254e4ed512d20e1", "measure_id": "200200562", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students at Fresno City/Reedley College (Clovis, Madera, Oakhurst Centers) for transfer to four-year colleges and careers, including public safety, firefighting, healthcare technology and business, by upgrading equipment, lighting, wiring, fire safety; replacing portables; repairing plubing, heating/ventilation; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries, computer labs, buildings, parking, acquiring land, shall State Center Community College District issue $161,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11179, "no_votes": 11400, "total_votes": 22579, "percent_yes": 49.510607201381816, "percent_no": 50.489392798618184, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.057421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.797406", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students at Fresno City/Reedley College (Clovis, Madera, Oakhurst Centers) for transfer to four-year colleges and careers, including public safety, firefighting, healthcare technology and business, by upgrading equipment, lighting, wiring, fire safety; replacing portables; repairing plubing, heating/ventilation; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries, computer labs, buildings, parking, acquiring land, shall State Center Community College District issue $161,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9170, "fingerprint": "2002|200200561|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200561|MADERA", "content_hash": "5e30b50601a72bff", "measure_id": "200200561", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build new facilities at Merced College to support education and occupational training in sciences, agriculture, technology, health and business, including classrooms, labs, and lecture halls; construct a library with computer/research facilities; renovate existing buildings, including for disabled access; and for other specified projects, shall Merced Community College District issue $53,500,000 in bonds, payable from taxes levied only in the Merced Campus service area, at interest rates within legal limits, and establish a citizens' bond oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1028, "no_votes": 1071, "total_votes": 2099, "percent_yes": 48.97570271557884, "percent_no": 51.02429728442116, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.057149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.797217", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build new facilities at Merced College to support education and occupational training in sciences, agriculture, technology, health and business, including classrooms, labs, and lecture halls; construct a library with computer/research facilities; renovate existing buildings, including for disabled access; and for other specified projects, shall Merced Community College District issue $53,500,000 in bonds, payable from taxes levied only in the Merced Campus service area, at interest rates within legal limits, and establish a citizens' bond oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11951, "fingerprint": "2002|200200564|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200564|MARIN", "content_hash": "387618bf3ec9ac80", "measure_id": "200200564", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance the quality of education through facility improvements; ensure student safety; upgrade, construct, acquire and equip school libraries, classrooms, science labs, arts facilities; modernize plumbing, bathroom and locker facilities; upgrade technology infrastructure; install energy efficient heating/cooling systems; and remove hazardous conditions, shall San Rafael High School District issue $49,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, create a Citizens Oversight Committee, a perform audits to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15011, "no_votes": 7197, "total_votes": 22208, "percent_yes": 67.59275936599424, "percent_no": 32.40724063400576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.981296", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.064411", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.800151", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance the quality of education through facility improvements; ensure student safety; upgrade, construct, acquire and equip school libraries, classrooms, science labs, arts facilities; modernize plumbing, bathroom and locker facilities; upgrade technology infrastructure; install energy efficient heating/cooling systems; and remove hazardous conditions, shall San Rafael High School District issue $49,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, create a Citizens Oversight Committee, a perform audits to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9173, "fingerprint": "2002|200200146|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200146|MARIN", "content_hash": "0348dfe16066776a", "measure_id": "200200146", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain excellence in Kentfield's public education by supporting superior academic core programs, attracting/retaining highly-qualified teachers, maintaining small class sizes, and enhancing technology programs, shall Kentfield Unified School District levy parcel taxes, to replace existing assessments, at $550 per year for parcels containing one single-family residence, at rates specified in the sample ballot for all other parcels, increase rates by 5% per year, grant senior exemptions, and implement an annual financial audit, for seven years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2634, "no_votes": 1276, "total_votes": 3910, "percent_yes": 67.36572890025575, "percent_no": 32.634271099744254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.058047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.797779", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain excellence in Kentfield's public education by supporting superior academic core programs, attracting/retaining highly-qualified teachers, maintaining small class sizes, and enhancing technology programs, shall Kentfield Unified School District levy parcel taxes, to replace existing assessments, at $550 per year for parcels containing one single-family residence, at rates specified in the sample ballot for all other parcels, increase rates by 5% per year, grant senior exemptions, and implement an annual financial audit, for seven years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11950, "fingerprint": "2002|200200563|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200563|MARIN", "content_hash": "f1b828c7bb1a0a4f", "measure_id": "200200563", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance the quality of education through facility improvements; ensure student safety; upgrade, construct, acquire and equip school libraries, classrooms, science labs, arts facilities; modernize plumbing, bathroom and locker facilities; upgrade technology infrastructure; install energy efficient heating/cooling systems; and remove hazardous conditions, shall San Rafael Elementary School District issue $49,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, create a Citizens Oversight Committee, a perform audits to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9365, "no_votes": 4300, "total_votes": 13665, "percent_yes": 68.53274789608489, "percent_no": 31.467252103915115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.981098", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.063845", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.799969", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance the quality of education through facility improvements; ensure student safety; upgrade, construct, acquire and equip school libraries, classrooms, science labs, arts facilities; modernize plumbing, bathroom and locker facilities; upgrade technology infrastructure; install energy efficient heating/cooling systems; and remove hazardous conditions, shall San Rafael Elementary School District issue $49,300,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, create a Citizens Oversight Committee, a perform audits to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9172, "fingerprint": "2002|200200060|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200060|MARIN", "content_hash": "24d0a21bec47dde6", "measure_id": "200200060", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Sausalito be authorized to replace the existing fire station and former police building with a new combined Public Safety Building, a part of which will be located on Caledonia Street, consistent with the Design Review approved by the Planning Commission on August 8, 2001?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 978, "no_votes": 1930, "total_votes": 2908, "percent_yes": 33.63136176066025, "percent_no": 66.36863823933976, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.057729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.797592", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City of Sausalito be authorized to replace the existing fire station and former police building with a new combined Public Safety Building, a part of which will be located on Caledonia Street, consistent with the Design Review approved by the Planning Commission on August 8, 2001?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9178, "fingerprint": "2002|200200368|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200368|MARIN", "content_hash": "ae804c27b9c0d593", "measure_id": "200200368", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Corte Madera voters adopt an ordinance continuing a special tax for four more years for paramedic and/or emergency medical services at a rate of $30.00 per residence and $30.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal year 2003-2004, increasing $5.00 yearly to $45.00 per residence and $45.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses in 2006-2007, and increasing the appropriations limit by the tax proceeds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2564, "no_votes": 781, "total_votes": 3345, "percent_yes": 76.65171898355754, "percent_no": 23.348281016442456, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.059708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.798689", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Corte Madera voters adopt an ordinance continuing a special tax for four more years for paramedic and/or emergency medical services at a rate of $30.00 per residence and $30.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for fiscal year 2003-2004, increasing $5.00 yearly to $45.00 per residence and $45.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses in 2006-2007, and increasing the appropriations limit by the tax proceeds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9179, "fingerprint": "2002|200200369|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200369|MARIN", "content_hash": "d714b6e3a2cacce9", "measure_id": "200200369", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a four year special tax commencing 2003-2004, for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use, to be levied in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers without pursuing collection from uninsured persons, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2192, "no_votes": 809, "total_votes": 3001, "percent_yes": 73.04231922692436, "percent_no": 26.957680773075637, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.060489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.798874", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a four year special tax commencing 2003-2004, for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use, to be levied in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers without pursuing collection from uninsured persons, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11949, "fingerprint": "2002|200200370|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200370|MARIN", "content_hash": "7e7fdecfa1c1e6c8", "measure_id": "200200370", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a resolution be approved to continue the special tax for paramedic services at the same rate of not to exceed $30 per year for each living unit located within the City of Larkspur for an additional four years, and the appropriations limit be adjusted accordingly if necessary?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4012, "no_votes": 623, "total_votes": 4635, "percent_yes": 86.55879180151025, "percent_no": 13.441208198489747, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.980084", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.061030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.799056", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a resolution be approved to continue the special tax for paramedic services at the same rate of not to exceed $30 per year for each living unit located within the City of Larkspur for an additional four years, and the appropriations limit be adjusted accordingly if necessary?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9174, "fingerprint": "2002|200200147|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200147|MARIN", "content_hash": "8d515342cd41aaa3", "measure_id": "200200147", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Santa Rosa Junior College (Santa Rosa, Petaluma, all locations) prepare students for jobs and four year colleges by acquiring, constructing, furnishing, repairing deteriorating classrooms, libraries, laboratories, sites, parking; upgrading fire safety, ventilation/plumbing, electrical, computer technology wiring; replacing portables; completing and upgrading training centers for firefighters, police, nurses, paramedics, technology; by Sonoma County Junior College District issuing $251,700,000 of bonds and legal rates, with Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits and no money for operations or administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64, "no_votes": 39, "total_votes": 103, "percent_yes": 62.13592233009708, "percent_no": 37.86407766990292, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.058398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.797965", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Santa Rosa Junior College (Santa Rosa, Petaluma, all locations) prepare students for jobs and four year colleges by acquiring, constructing, furnishing, repairing deteriorating classrooms, libraries, laboratories, sites, parking; upgrading fire safety, ventilation/plumbing, electrical, computer technology wiring; replacing portables; completing and upgrading training centers for firefighters, police, nurses, paramedics, technology; by Sonoma County Junior College District issuing $251,700,000 of bonds and legal rates, with Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits and no money for operations or administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9180, "fingerprint": "2002|200200371|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200371|MARIN", "content_hash": "1a5e04c31e01bf33", "measure_id": "200200371", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a four-year special tax for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use, to be collected in addition to fees for transport to the hospital charged to insurance providers, with appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 758, "no_votes": 219, "total_votes": 977, "percent_yes": 77.58444216990789, "percent_no": 22.415557830092112, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.061615", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.799237", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a four-year special tax for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use, to be collected in addition to fees for transport to the hospital charged to insurance providers, with appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9181, "fingerprint": "2002|200200372|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200372|MARIN", "content_hash": "1a5e04c31e01bf33", "measure_id": "200200372", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a four-year special tax for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use, to be collected in addition to fees for transport to the hospital charged to insurance providers, with appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3541, "no_votes": 1283, "total_votes": 4824, "percent_yes": 73.40381426202322, "percent_no": 26.596185737976782, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.062299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.799418", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a four-year special tax for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use, to be collected in addition to fees for transport to the hospital charged to insurance providers, with appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9183, "fingerprint": "2002|200200374|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200374|MARIN", "content_hash": "dca1fdc3cc2a841d", "measure_id": "200200374", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Town adopt the General Plan amendment defining \"prime open space\" and prohibiting development of such land unless necessary to avoid environmental impacts, to avoid unconstitutional taking, or to allow affordable housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1793, "no_votes": 1987, "total_votes": 3780, "percent_yes": 47.43386243386243, "percent_no": 52.56613756613757, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.063344", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.799788", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the Town adopt the General Plan amendment defining \"prime open space\" and prohibiting development of such land unless necessary to avoid environmental impacts, to avoid unconstitutional taking, or to allow affordable housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9176, "fingerprint": "2002|200200254|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200254|MARIN", "content_hash": "e3f8d366ae3655cb", "measure_id": "200200254", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 13 be amended increasing the special tax for paramedic services effective July 1, 2003 in an amount not to exceed $61.00 per year for each living unit, and a maximum of eight cents per square foot for each non-residential structure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1554, "no_votes": 439, "total_votes": 1993, "percent_yes": 77.97290516808832, "percent_no": 22.027094831911683, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.058985", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.798326", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 13 be amended increasing the special tax for paramedic services effective July 1, 2003 in an amount not to exceed $61.00 per year for each living unit, and a maximum of eight cents per square foot for each non-residential structure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9177, "fingerprint": "2002|200200255|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200255|MARIN", "content_hash": "f9d62500190e41e7", "measure_id": "200200255", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit for Marinwood Community Services District be increased in the amount of the special tax for fiscal years beginning July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2007?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1383, "no_votes": 566, "total_votes": 1949, "percent_yes": 70.95946639302207, "percent_no": 29.04053360697793, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.059304", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.798509", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit for Marinwood Community Services District be increased in the amount of the special tax for fiscal years beginning July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2007?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9175, "fingerprint": "2002|200200253|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200253|MARIN", "content_hash": "840330590f5e6ead", "measure_id": "200200253", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 3280 be amended increasing the special tax for paramedic services effective July 1, 2003 in an amount not to exceed $61.00 per year for each living unit, and a maximum of 8 cents ($0.08) per square foot for each non-residential structure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 714, "no_votes": 124, "total_votes": 838, "percent_yes": 85.20286396181385, "percent_no": 14.797136038186153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.058711", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.798147", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 3280 be amended increasing the special tax for paramedic services effective July 1, 2003 in an amount not to exceed $61.00 per year for each living unit, and a maximum of 8 cents ($0.08) per square foot for each non-residential structure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9182, "fingerprint": "2002|200200373|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200373|MARIN", "content_hash": "f558a060a0927265", "measure_id": "200200373", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall San Rafael Municipal Code Chapter 3.28, by which the voters approved a special tax to provide paramedic service in the City, be amended to permit, in phased increases, up to $8.00 additional tax on residential units, and up to $.01 per square foot additional tax on non-residential structures, to fully fund paramedic service costs, and shall San Rafael's appropriations limit be correspondingly increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12743, "no_votes": 3975, "total_votes": 16718, "percent_yes": 76.22323244407225, "percent_no": 23.776767555927748, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.062852", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.799599", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall San Rafael Municipal Code Chapter 3.28, by which the voters approved a special tax to provide paramedic service in the City, be amended to permit, in phased increases, up to $8.00 additional tax on residential units, and up to $.01 per square foot additional tax on non-residential structures, to fully fund paramedic service costs, and shall San Rafael's appropriations limit be correspondingly increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9189, "fingerprint": "2002|200200001|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200001|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "43fc750b32fa3325", "measure_id": "200200001", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of Mendocino High; repair/replace leaky roofs and deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; and modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Mendocino Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $31,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating an average $1,700,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2116, "no_votes": 903, "total_votes": 3019, "percent_yes": 70.08943358728055, "percent_no": 29.910566412719447, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "Measure", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-03", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.067676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.801252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of Mendocino High; repair/replace leaky roofs and deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; and modernize/construct classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Mendocino Unified School District\u2019s measure be adopted authorizing $31,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, generating an average $1,700,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 6 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens\u2019 oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9184, "fingerprint": "2002|200200013|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200013|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "53e511d4a5c4be5a", "measure_id": "200200013", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 117 of the Brooktrails Township Community District increasing the Special Tax for Fire Protection and Prevention, including ambulance service and emergency medical response, commencing with the Fiscal Year beginning July 1,2002 be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 623, "no_votes": 468, "total_votes": 1091, "percent_yes": 57.10357470210816, "percent_no": 42.89642529789184, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.064896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.800334", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 117 of the Brooktrails Township Community District increasing the Special Tax for Fire Protection and Prevention, including ambulance service and emergency medical response, commencing with the Fiscal Year beginning July 1,2002 be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9185, "fingerprint": "2002|200200148|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200148|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "c3665634820da95c", "measure_id": "200200148", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Santa Rosa Junior College (Santa Rosa, Petaluma, all locations) prepare students for jobs and four year colleges by acquiring, constructing, furnishing, repairing deteriorating classrooms, libraries, laboratories, sites, parking; upgrading fire safety, ventilation/plumbing, electrical, computer technology wiring; replacing portables; completing and upgrading training centers for firefighters, police, nurses, paramedics, technology; by Sonoma County Junior College District issuing $251,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, with Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits and no money for operations or administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 598, "no_votes": 338, "total_votes": 936, "percent_yes": 63.888888888888886, "percent_no": 36.111111111111114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.065525", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.800514", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Santa Rosa Junior College (Santa Rosa, Petaluma, all locations) prepare students for jobs and four year colleges by acquiring, constructing, furnishing, repairing deteriorating classrooms, libraries, laboratories, sites, parking; upgrading fire safety, ventilation/plumbing, electrical, computer technology wiring; replacing portables; completing and upgrading training centers for firefighters, police, nurses, paramedics, technology; by Sonoma County Junior College District issuing $251,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, with Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits and no money for operations or administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9188, "fingerprint": "2002|200200567|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200567|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "3ef05f7d6a6fc1b4", "measure_id": "200200567", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of reduction of class size and maintenance and enhancement of academic and educational programs by levying a special tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of seven years, beginning July 1, 2003 and increase its appropriation limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25, "no_votes": 21, "total_votes": 46, "percent_yes": 54.34782608695652, "percent_no": 45.65217391304348, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.067022", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.801070", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Southern Humboldt Joint Unified School District provide funds for the purpose of reduction of class size and maintenance and enhancement of academic and educational programs by levying a special tax on each assessor's parcel of $75.00 per year ($37.50 semi-annual payment) for a period of seven years, beginning July 1, 2003 and increase its appropriation limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9186, "fingerprint": "2002|200200565|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200565|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "574184f90ce0febc", "measure_id": "200200565", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To finance school improvements such as: facility upgrades, renovations and additions to alleviate overcrowding and comply with current safety standards; add a multipurpose room for school/community recreation and cultural/academic uses; install outdoor lighting and playground structure and qualify for State matching grants for eligible projects, shall the District issue $1,180,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, for acquisition and improvement of real property, with no money for school or district operating salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 118, "no_votes": 78, "total_votes": 196, "percent_yes": 60.204081632653065, "percent_no": 39.795918367346935, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.066039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.800701", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance school improvements such as: facility upgrades, renovations and additions to alleviate overcrowding and comply with current safety standards; add a multipurpose room for school/community recreation and cultural/academic uses; install outdoor lighting and playground structure and qualify for State matching grants for eligible projects, shall the District issue $1,180,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, for acquisition and improvement of real property, with no money for school or district operating salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9187, "fingerprint": "2002|200200566|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200566|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "7c797217613d22e4", "measure_id": "200200566", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reconstruct the Mendocino Grammar School in order to replace the deteriorating buildings; to upgrade to energy efficient lighting, ventilating, and heating systems; to repair, upgrade, modernize and structurally improve the Middle School and District High School buildings, classrooms and fields and to qualify to receive State matching grants of up to $2,500,000; shall the Mendocino Unified School District issue $8,500,000 of bonds at the rates within the legal limits with strict annual audits and citizens oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1120, "no_votes": 1604, "total_votes": 2724, "percent_yes": 41.116005873715125, "percent_no": 58.883994126284875, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.066542", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.800886", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reconstruct the Mendocino Grammar School in order to replace the deteriorating buildings; to upgrade to energy efficient lighting, ventilating, and heating systems; to repair, upgrade, modernize and structurally improve the Middle School and District High School buildings, classrooms and fields and to qualify to receive State matching grants of up to $2,500,000; shall the Mendocino Unified School District issue $8,500,000 of bonds at the rates within the legal limits with strict annual audits and citizens oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9190, "fingerprint": "2002|200200061|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200061|MERCED", "content_hash": "7830a3eea3aa4bf4", "measure_id": "200200061", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Merced be amended to make the general provisions of state law for the governance of public school districts applicable to the Merced County School District, by repealing Article XII of the City Charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4710, "no_votes": 3087, "total_votes": 7797, "percent_yes": 60.40784917275875, "percent_no": 39.59215082724125, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.068267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.801445", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Merced be amended to make the general provisions of state law for the governance of public school districts applicable to the Merced County School District, by repealing Article XII of the City Charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9191, "fingerprint": "2002|200200062|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200062|MERCED", "content_hash": "a11a0befe216b5ca", "measure_id": "200200062", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Merced's transient occupancy tax (TOT) be increased from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%), through the enactment of a two percent (2%) special tax to provide dedicated funding for equipment, operation and maintenance, for a proposed aquatic complex to be constructed near Joe Herb Park and Golden Valley High School and for City recreational programs, subject to fund availability?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2890, "no_votes": 5797, "total_votes": 8687, "percent_yes": 33.26810176125244, "percent_no": 66.73189823874756, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.068791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.801632", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Merced's transient occupancy tax (TOT) be increased from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%), through the enactment of a two percent (2%) special tax to provide dedicated funding for equipment, operation and maintenance, for a proposed aquatic complex to be constructed near Joe Herb Park and Golden Valley High School and for City recreational programs, subject to fund availability?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9192, "fingerprint": "2002|200200149|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200149|MERCED", "content_hash": "26effa4ecd7554b1", "measure_id": "200200149", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education for students, shall the McSwain Union Elementary School District be authorized to finance the construction, improvement, and renovation of school facilities including the upgrade of electrical systems for technology, construction of new classrooms, science laboratories, and a library/media center, make health and safety improvements, and make the district eligible to receive up to $2,300,000 in State funds by issuing up to $6,500,000 of bonds bearing interest at rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 431, "no_votes": 894, "total_votes": 1325, "percent_yes": 32.52830188679245, "percent_no": 67.47169811320755, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.069329", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.801816", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education for students, shall the McSwain Union Elementary School District be authorized to finance the construction, improvement, and renovation of school facilities including the upgrade of electrical systems for technology, construction of new classrooms, science laboratories, and a library/media center, make health and safety improvements, and make the district eligible to receive up to $2,300,000 in State funds by issuing up to $6,500,000 of bonds bearing interest at rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9199, "fingerprint": "2002|200200573|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200573|MERCED", "content_hash": "62a542ebbbf73fc0", "measure_id": "200200573", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To accommodate increasing student enrollment and to relieve and prevent overcrowding, shall the Turlock Joint Elementary School District issue $10,950,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limit to construct two new elementary schools and modernize the Ditcher Middle School as specified in the District's bond Project List, and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 113, "no_votes": 121, "total_votes": 234, "percent_yes": 48.29059829059829, "percent_no": 51.70940170940171, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.073214", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.803126", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To accommodate increasing student enrollment and to relieve and prevent overcrowding, shall the Turlock Joint Elementary School District issue $10,950,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limit to construct two new elementary schools and modernize the Ditcher Middle School as specified in the District's bond Project List, and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9196, "fingerprint": "2002|200200570|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200570|MERCED", "content_hash": "cdda5d1d5454c15c", "measure_id": "200200570", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify the District to receive approximately $4,000,000 in State modernization funds to modernize the Hilmar Elementary School, Marquin Elementary School, Hilmar Middle School and Hilmar High School shall Hilmar Unified School District issue $2,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a detailed project list, a citizen oversight committee and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1483, "no_votes": 551, "total_votes": 2034, "percent_yes": 72.91052114060965, "percent_no": 27.089478859390354, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.071457", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.802556", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify the District to receive approximately $4,000,000 in State modernization funds to modernize the Hilmar Elementary School, Marquin Elementary School, Hilmar Middle School and Hilmar High School shall Hilmar Unified School District issue $2,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a detailed project list, a citizen oversight committee and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9195, "fingerprint": "2002|200200569|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200569|MERCED", "content_hash": "b8e06b2d3c52fcbf", "measure_id": "200200569", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Dos Palos Ora Loma Joint Unified School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, expand and upgrade school facilities, update inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to classroom computers and modern technology, renovate schools and qualify the District to receive $4,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $4,400,000 of bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 957, "no_votes": 442, "total_votes": 1399, "percent_yes": 68.4060042887777, "percent_no": 31.593995711222306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.070960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.802375", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Dos Palos Ora Loma Joint Unified School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, expand and upgrade school facilities, update inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to classroom computers and modern technology, renovate schools and qualify the District to receive $4,000,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $4,400,000 of bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9197, "fingerprint": "2002|200200571|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200571|MERCED", "content_hash": "63e88fc600b7fe52", "measure_id": "200200571", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build new facilities at Merced College to support education and occupational training in sciences, agriculture, technology, health and business, including classrooms, labs, and lecture halls; construct a library with computer/research facilities; renovate existing buildings, including disabled access; and for other specified projects, shall Merced Community College District issue $53,500,000 in bonds, payable from taxes levied only in the Merced Campus service area, at interest rates within legal limits, and establish a citizens' bond oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16020, "no_votes": 12475, "total_votes": 28495, "percent_yes": 56.22038954202492, "percent_no": 43.77961045797508, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.071996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.802753", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build new facilities at Merced College to support education and occupational training in sciences, agriculture, technology, health and business, including classrooms, labs, and lecture halls; construct a library with computer/research facilities; renovate existing buildings, including disabled access; and for other specified projects, shall Merced Community College District issue $53,500,000 in bonds, payable from taxes levied only in the Merced Campus service area, at interest rates within legal limits, and establish a citizens' bond oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9194, "fingerprint": "2002|200200568|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200568|MERCED", "content_hash": "692f9febf2e3b5ad", "measure_id": "200200568", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student safety, relieve serious elementary school overcrowding, repair and renovate aging classrooms and schools, including upgrading obsolete electrical systems and installing modern technology in classrooms; to acquire land and construct additional schools and facilities to accommodate enrollment growth; and qualify for state matching funds, shall the Atwater Elementary School District issue $16.5 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limits with annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3425, "no_votes": 2196, "total_votes": 5621, "percent_yes": 60.93221846646504, "percent_no": 39.06778153353496, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.070312", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.802194", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student safety, relieve serious elementary school overcrowding, repair and renovate aging classrooms and schools, including upgrading obsolete electrical systems and installing modern technology in classrooms; to acquire land and construct additional schools and facilities to accommodate enrollment growth; and qualify for state matching funds, shall the Atwater Elementary School District issue $16.5 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limits with annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9198, "fingerprint": "2002|200200572|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200572|MERCED", "content_hash": "027f128a3a5c0f2a", "measure_id": "200200572", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To establish a new permanent Los Banos area campus of Merced Community College on land that has been donated to the College, by financing construction of buildings for classrooms, laboratories, libraries, technology and vocational education programs; development of the physical site; and other specified projects; shall Merced Community College District issue $11,930,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit payable from taxes levied only in the Los Banos campus service area, and establish a citizens' bond oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4566, "no_votes": 2086, "total_votes": 6652, "percent_yes": 68.64101022248947, "percent_no": 31.35898977751053, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.072516", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.802941", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To establish a new permanent Los Banos area campus of Merced Community College on land that has been donated to the College, by financing construction of buildings for classrooms, laboratories, libraries, technology and vocational education programs; development of the physical site; and other specified projects; shall Merced Community College District issue $11,930,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit payable from taxes levied only in the Los Banos campus service area, and establish a citizens' bond oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9193, "fingerprint": "2002|200200256|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200256|MERCED", "content_hash": "83f389bc355248ac", "measure_id": "200200256", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Merced County voters authorize a transportation expenditure plan directing County sales tax revenues to the following transportation projects: Maintaining and improving local streets and rural farm roads; Making improvements to Highway 99, Highway 59, and Highway 152; Providing transportation services for seniors and people with disabilities; Improving access to the new University of California, Merced campus; Approval of the Expenditure plan authorized collection of a 1/2 cent transportation sales tax during the plan's implementation.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23795, "no_votes": 15021, "total_votes": 38816, "percent_yes": 61.30204039571311, "percent_no": 38.69795960428689, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.069829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.802004", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Merced County voters authorize a transportation expenditure plan directing County sales tax revenues to the following transportation projects: Maintaining and improving local streets and rural farm roads; Making improvements to Highway 99, Highway 59, and Highway 152; Providing transportation services for seniors and people with disabilities; Improving access to the new University of California, Merced campus; Approval of the Expenditure plan authorized collection of a 1/2 cent transportation sales tax during the plan's implementation.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9200, "fingerprint": "2002|200200150|MODOC|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200150|MODOC", "content_hash": "a4817184fe775059", "measure_id": "200200150", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Modoc", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs: construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades; construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens Oversight Committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no bond money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21, "no_votes": 18, "total_votes": 39, "percent_yes": 53.84615384615385, "percent_no": 46.15384615384615, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.073722", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.803311", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs: construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades; construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens Oversight Committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no bond money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Modoc_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9202, "fingerprint": "2002|200200063|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200063|MONO", "content_hash": "d7bd303316f2928e", "measure_id": "200200063", "measure_letter": "2002-A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to increase the transient occupancy tax rate by two percent be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 876, "no_votes": 232, "total_votes": 1108, "percent_yes": 79.06137184115524, "percent_no": 20.938628158844764, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.074743", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.803674", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to increase the transient occupancy tax rate by two percent be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9201, "fingerprint": "2002|200200014|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200014|MONO", "content_hash": "28340e519eb5e835", "measure_id": "200200014", "measure_letter": "2002-T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the county ordinance entitled \"The Tourists' Fair Share Act\" (pertaining to tranisient occupancy tax) be approved and enacted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1941, "no_votes": 491, "total_votes": 2432, "percent_yes": 79.8108552631579, "percent_no": 20.189144736842096, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.074273", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.803492", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the county ordinance entitled \"The Tourists' Fair Share Act\" (pertaining to tranisient occupancy tax) be approved and enacted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9203, "fingerprint": "2002|200200574|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200574|MONO", "content_hash": "9b1549538cfdad05", "measure_id": "200200574", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Eastern Sierra Unified School District be authorized to finance classroom modernization; upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to technology; make health and safety improvements; upgrade plumbing systems; provide energy efficient windows, repair roofs, construct new classrooms, and qualify for State funds [up to $1,312,000], by issuing $5.6 million in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 598, "no_votes": 605, "total_votes": 1203, "percent_yes": 49.70906068162926, "percent_no": 50.29093931837074, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.075233", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.803858", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Eastern Sierra Unified School District be authorized to finance classroom modernization; upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to technology; make health and safety improvements; upgrade plumbing systems; provide energy efficient windows, repair roofs, construct new classrooms, and qualify for State funds [up to $1,312,000], by issuing $5.6 million in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11953, "fingerprint": "2002|200200379|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200379|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "ce7c87eac486d8ee", "measure_id": "200200379", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Proposed Charter Amendment to require Outside Binding Arbitration of Disputes Regarding Wages, Hours and Other Terms and Conditions of Employment Regarding Certain Police and Fire Employees be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4538, "no_votes": 2770, "total_votes": 7308, "percent_yes": 62.09633278598796, "percent_no": 37.90366721401204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.987767", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.080957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.805693", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Proposed Charter Amendment to require Outside Binding Arbitration of Disputes Regarding Wages, Hours and Other Terms and Conditions of Employment Regarding Certain Police and Fire Employees be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11952, "fingerprint": "2002|200200225|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200225|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "42410704e55b0d08", "measure_id": "200200225", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Greenfield be authorized to levy a Special Tax on residential dwelling units, commercial property and other real property within Community Facilities District 2001-01 and to issue a bond not to exceed $6 million to fund construction of a community center, a community museum, community recreational facilities and the operation and maintenance costs thereof?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 506, "no_votes": 761, "total_votes": 1267, "percent_yes": 39.9368587213891, "percent_no": 60.0631412786109, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-06-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.986161", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.077810", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.804594", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Greenfield be authorized to levy a Special Tax on residential dwelling units, commercial property and other real property within Community Facilities District 2001-01 and to issue a bond not to exceed $6 million to fund construction of a community center, a community museum, community recreational facilities and the operation and maintenance costs thereof?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9205, "fingerprint": "2002|200200152|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200152|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "ad564251a8f20cc2", "measure_id": "200200152", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Neighborhood School Safety and Repair Measure. To repair schools constructed between 1927 and 1966, including leaky roofs, electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation systems, upgrade science labs, provide students with access to modern technology; install fire safety/lighting systems; qualify for State modernization funds; construct, renovate, acquire, equip classrooms, school facilities, sites, shall Monterey Peninsula Unified School District issue $158,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint an Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5924, "no_votes": 7741, "total_votes": 13665, "percent_yes": 43.35162824734723, "percent_no": 56.64837175265277, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.076389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.804224", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Neighborhood School Safety and Repair Measure. To repair schools constructed between 1927 and 1966, including leaky roofs, electrical, plumbing, heating/ventilation systems, upgrade science labs, provide students with access to modern technology; install fire safety/lighting systems; qualify for State modernization funds; construct, renovate, acquire, equip classrooms, school facilities, sites, shall Monterey Peninsula Unified School District issue $158,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint an Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9212, "fingerprint": "2002|200200380|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200380|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "6adfa0b467f61d52", "measure_id": "200200380", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Should the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District be Dissolved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20671, "no_votes": 10621, "total_votes": 31292, "percent_yes": 66.05841748689761, "percent_no": 33.94158251310239, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.081428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.805873", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Should the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District be Dissolved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9207, "fingerprint": "2002|200200257|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200257|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "aac9573b16b0e58a", "measure_id": "200200257", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall there be imposed an annual special tax of $58.26 per taxable parcel within the Pajaro/Sunny Mesa Community Services District, as designated by the Monterey County Tax Assessor, for the purpose of operating and maintaining parks and recreation facilities and street sweeping services within the District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 127, "no_votes": 205, "total_votes": 332, "percent_yes": 38.25301204819277, "percent_no": 61.74698795180723, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.078364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.804780", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be imposed an annual special tax of $58.26 per taxable parcel within the Pajaro/Sunny Mesa Community Services District, as designated by the Monterey County Tax Assessor, for the purpose of operating and maintaining parks and recreation facilities and street sweeping services within the District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9222, "fingerprint": "2002|200200581|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200581|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "8713d7f177a78959", "measure_id": "200200581", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve quality of education, shall Spreckels Union School District be authorized to repair/modernize/construct classrooms and core student support facilities, make health/safety improvements, expand/upgrade existing school facilities, replace old portable classrooms, acquire/design site to house additional student growth, renovate District Schools and qualify to receive $4,711,118 in State-matching funds by issuing $5,335,000 of bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, citizens oversight committee and no bond funds spent on staff salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1594, "no_votes": 728, "total_votes": 2322, "percent_yes": 68.64771748492679, "percent_no": 31.352282515073213, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.086416", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.808025", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve quality of education, shall Spreckels Union School District be authorized to repair/modernize/construct classrooms and core student support facilities, make health/safety improvements, expand/upgrade existing school facilities, replace old portable classrooms, acquire/design site to house additional student growth, renovate District Schools and qualify to receive $4,711,118 in State-matching funds by issuing $5,335,000 of bonds within legal interest rates, with annual audits, citizens oversight committee and no bond funds spent on staff salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9218, "fingerprint": "2002|200200577|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200577|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a06d44653a747031", "measure_id": "200200577", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a middle school that will serve students in grades seven and eight, refurbish and upgrade facilities at North Monterey County High School and the District's six other schools, all of which are over thirty years old, shall the North Monterey County Unified School District, with State matching funds, issue $20,750,000 of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to annually audit the expenditure of bond revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4188, "no_votes": 1935, "total_votes": 6123, "percent_yes": 68.39784419402254, "percent_no": 31.60215580597746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.085095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.807177", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a middle school that will serve students in grades seven and eight, refurbish and upgrade facilities at North Monterey County High School and the District's six other schools, all of which are over thirty years old, shall the North Monterey County Unified School District, with State matching funds, issue $20,750,000 of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to annually audit the expenditure of bond revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9206, "fingerprint": "2002|200200153|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200153|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "16578d1bd7866ab5", "measure_id": "200200153", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair every neighborhood high school, improve safety and relieve overcrowding, by repairing leaky roofs/decaying walls; installing and repairing fire safety equipment, repairing deteriorating restrooms and plumbing; improving campus security and libraries; upgrading wiring for computer technology; replacing portables with permanent classrooms/labs; removing asbestos; and acquiring land for a new high school, shall Salinas Union High School District Issue $52,000,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring annual financial audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12746, "no_votes": 8365, "total_votes": 21111, "percent_yes": 60.3761072426697, "percent_no": 39.6238927573303, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.077096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.804408", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair every neighborhood high school, improve safety and relieve overcrowding, by repairing leaky roofs/decaying walls; installing and repairing fire safety equipment, repairing deteriorating restrooms and plumbing; improving campus security and libraries; upgrading wiring for computer technology; replacing portables with permanent classrooms/labs; removing asbestos; and acquiring land for a new high school, shall Salinas Union High School District Issue $52,000,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring annual financial audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9208, "fingerprint": "2002|200200375|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200375|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "dbaf85ac78196662", "measure_id": "200200375", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the 6% Utility Users tax currently levied by the City of Greenfield on utilities be reduced to a tax on utilities not to exceed 3%.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1039, "no_votes": 503, "total_votes": 1542, "percent_yes": 67.38002594033723, "percent_no": 32.619974059662766, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.078895", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.804963", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the 6% Utility Users tax currently levied by the City of Greenfield on utilities be reduced to a tax on utilities not to exceed 3%.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9216, "fingerprint": "2002|200200575|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200575|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "59668ab777e4e913", "measure_id": "200200575", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Hartnell College Repair and Safety Measure:  To prepare students for skilled jobs, four-year colleges, train nurses and public safety officers by:  Repairing leaking, decaying walls; Upgrading fire safety; Removing hazardous materials; Upgrading wiring for computer technology; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, sites, science/computer labs;  Shall Hartnell Community College District issue $131,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual performance and financial audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29740, "no_votes": 15464, "total_votes": 45204, "percent_yes": 65.79063799663747, "percent_no": 34.20936200336253, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.084176", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.806813", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Hartnell College Repair and Safety Measure:  To prepare students for skilled jobs, four-year colleges, train nurses and public safety officers by:  Repairing leaking, decaying walls; Upgrading fire safety; Removing hazardous materials; Upgrading wiring for computer technology; Repairing, acquiring, constructing, equipping buildings, classrooms, libraries, sites, science/computer labs;  Shall Hartnell Community College District issue $131,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual performance and financial audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9217, "fingerprint": "2002|200200576|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200576|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "4d93f427fd31f0b6", "measure_id": "200200576", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Monterey Peninsula College students for jobs and 4-year universities by repairing deteriorating roofs, worn wiring/plumbing, inefficient heating/cooling systems; renovating aging classrooms, labs; repairing/acquiring/constructing/equipping college buildings, library, public safety training facility, sites, science and computer labs; upgrading technology campus-wide and training computer technicians; shall Monterey Peninsula Community College District issue $145,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with Strict Accountability Safeguards, including Citizens Oversight Committee, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23711, "no_votes": 12966, "total_votes": 36677, "percent_yes": 64.64814461379066, "percent_no": 35.35185538620934, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.084694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.806995", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Monterey Peninsula College students for jobs and 4-year universities by repairing deteriorating roofs, worn wiring/plumbing, inefficient heating/cooling systems; renovating aging classrooms, labs; repairing/acquiring/constructing/equipping college buildings, library, public safety training facility, sites, science and computer labs; upgrading technology campus-wide and training computer technicians; shall Monterey Peninsula Community College District issue $145,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with Strict Accountability Safeguards, including Citizens Oversight Committee, annual audits, no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9219, "fingerprint": "2002|200200578|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200578|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d3ade9baa9d3004a", "measure_id": "200200578", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Aptos and Watsonville Area School Improvements.  To improve Aptos High School by constructing, upgrading, equipping a performing arts center, classrooms, cafeteria, athletic facilities, parking/traffic safety improvements; to construct, improve, equip Watsonville Area Schools, including libraries, athletic facilities, cafeterias, classroom spaces, parking, high school facilities, shall Pajaro Valley Unified School District issue $58,250,000 of bonds ($24,036,000 for Aptos High School/$34,214,000 for Watsonville area schools) at legal rates with citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 815, "no_votes": 488, "total_votes": 1303, "percent_yes": 62.54796623177283, "percent_no": 37.45203376822717, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.085395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.807358", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Aptos and Watsonville Area School Improvements.  To improve Aptos High School by constructing, upgrading, equipping a performing arts center, classrooms, cafeteria, athletic facilities, parking/traffic safety improvements; to construct, improve, equip Watsonville Area Schools, including libraries, athletic facilities, cafeterias, classroom spaces, parking, high school facilities, shall Pajaro Valley Unified School District issue $58,250,000 of bonds ($24,036,000 for Aptos High School/$34,214,000 for Watsonville area schools) at legal rates with citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9209, "fingerprint": "2002|200200376|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200376|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "20e7b9ce0ed0b003", "measure_id": "200200376", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the revenue from the City's 2% utility users' tax applied to charges for telephone service, electric service, gas service, water service and cable television service, be placed in a special fund to be used exclusively for police and fire services in the City of King, effective January 1, 2003?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 923, "no_votes": 414, "total_votes": 1337, "percent_yes": 69.03515332834704, "percent_no": 30.964846671652964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.079382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.805143", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the revenue from the City's 2% utility users' tax applied to charges for telephone service, electric service, gas service, water service and cable television service, be placed in a special fund to be used exclusively for police and fire services in the City of King, effective January 1, 2003?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9210, "fingerprint": "2002|200200377|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200377|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "62be6a28ef8dc996", "measure_id": "200200377", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City's 2% utility users' tax applied to charges for telephone service, electric service, gas service, water service and cable television service, be repealed effective January 1, 2003?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 409, "no_votes": 923, "total_votes": 1332, "percent_yes": 30.7057057057057, "percent_no": 69.2942942942943, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.079991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.805328", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's 2% utility users' tax applied to charges for telephone service, electric service, gas service, water service and cable television service, be repealed effective January 1, 2003?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9221, "fingerprint": "2002|200200580|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200580|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "2b900c3592245913", "measure_id": "200200580", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair our LOCAL public MIDDLE SCHOOLS in Salinas, improve safety and relieve overcrowding, by refurbishing deteriorated walls, classrooms, libraries, cafeterias, and restrooms; improving campus security; upgrading technology access; replacing decayed portable classrooms, removing asbestos, completing construction of Harden and La Paz Middle Schools, and building a new middle school, shall Salinas Union High School District issue $37,000,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14651, "no_votes": 6938, "total_votes": 21589, "percent_yes": 67.86326369910603, "percent_no": 32.13673630089397, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.086035", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.807743", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair our LOCAL public MIDDLE SCHOOLS in Salinas, improve safety and relieve overcrowding, by refurbishing deteriorated walls, classrooms, libraries, cafeterias, and restrooms; improving campus security; upgrading technology access; replacing decayed portable classrooms, removing asbestos, completing construction of Harden and La Paz Middle Schools, and building a new middle school, shall Salinas Union High School District issue $37,000,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9220, "fingerprint": "2002|200200579|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200579|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "30341c6c8c1ba4ea", "measure_id": "200200579", "measure_letter": "N-02", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue bonds in the amount of $6,700,000, at the lowest available interest rate per annum within legal limits, to construct a new two story addition with fourteen additional classrooms and a new P.E. teaching complex, expand the gym, and convert two existing classrooms to science labs, at the high school in Paso Robles with a citizen's oversight committee to monitor and audit bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 27, "percent_yes": 55.55555555555556, "percent_no": 44.44444444444444, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.085692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.807539", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue bonds in the amount of $6,700,000, at the lowest available interest rate per annum within legal limits, to construct a new two story addition with fourteen additional classrooms and a new P.E. teaching complex, expand the gym, and convert two existing classrooms to science labs, at the high school in Paso Robles with a citizen's oversight committee to monitor and audit bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9214, "fingerprint": "2002|200200382|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200382|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "2bc232d574a42524", "measure_id": "200200382", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Initiative Amendment of Salinas City Code Section 32-48, 32-49, 32-50, 32-51 & 32-52 to reduce and then repeal existing utility users tax.  Shall the ordinance proposing to amend the Salinas City Code to reduce the utility users tax to three percent upon the effective date of the initiative, and then one percent on January 1, 2004, and then repeal the tax on January 1, 2005 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8185, "no_votes": 15986, "total_votes": 24171, "percent_yes": 33.862893550122045, "percent_no": 66.13710644987796, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.082589", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.806238", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Initiative Amendment of Salinas City Code Section 32-48, 32-49, 32-50, 32-51 & 32-52 to reduce and then repeal existing utility users tax.  Shall the ordinance proposing to amend the Salinas City Code to reduce the utility users tax to three percent upon the effective date of the initiative, and then one percent on January 1, 2004, and then repeal the tax on January 1, 2005 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9213, "fingerprint": "2002|200200381|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200381|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "71c463d91c6fc2c8", "measure_id": "200200381", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the utility tax rate applied to charges for telephone service, electric service, gas service, water service, and cable television service be reduced from 5% to 3%, effective January 1, 2003?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2391, "no_votes": 3853, "total_votes": 6244, "percent_yes": 38.29276105060858, "percent_no": 61.70723894939142, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.082006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.806055", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the utility tax rate applied to charges for telephone service, electric service, gas service, water service, and cable television service be reduced from 5% to 3%, effective January 1, 2003?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9211, "fingerprint": "2002|200200378|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200378|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "e8abfffd7b36500c", "measure_id": "200200378", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Library Bond Measure. Shall the city of Marina be authorized to issue general obligation bonds in a principal amount not exceeding $8,000,000 and bearing interest at rates within the legal limits, to assist in constructing a new library facility, pay costs related to bond issuance, and levy a special tax based on assessed valuation on all taxable real property and improvements in the city to pay for the bonds and the administration thereof?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3439, "no_votes": 886, "total_votes": 4325, "percent_yes": 79.51445086705202, "percent_no": 20.48554913294798, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.080478", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.805511", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Library Bond Measure. Shall the city of Marina be authorized to issue general obligation bonds in a principal amount not exceeding $8,000,000 and bearing interest at rates within the legal limits, to assist in constructing a new library facility, pay costs related to bond issuance, and levy a special tax based on assessed valuation on all taxable real property and improvements in the city to pay for the bonds and the administration thereof?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11954, "fingerprint": "2002|200200383|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200383|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "51125f929eb0c14c", "measure_id": "200200383", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 910 be adopted amending Section 3.30.70 of the City of Seaside Municipal Code entitled \"Tax Rate\", specifying that; a) effective beginning January 1, 2003, the tax rate imposed by this section shall not exceed the rate of 4%; and b) Effective beginning January 1, 2004, the tax rate imposed by this section shall not exceed the rate of 3%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2130, "no_votes": 2327, "total_votes": 4457, "percent_yes": 47.78999326901503, "percent_no": 52.21000673098497, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:36.990150", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.083126", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.806420", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 910 be adopted amending Section 3.30.70 of the City of Seaside Municipal Code entitled \"Tax Rate\", specifying that; a) effective beginning January 1, 2003, the tax rate imposed by this section shall not exceed the rate of 4%; and b) Effective beginning January 1, 2004, the tax rate imposed by this section shall not exceed the rate of 3%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9204, "fingerprint": "2002|200200151|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200151|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "518952d3ff443e62", "measure_id": "200200151", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify for State matching funds, expand vocational education classrooms, upgrade electrical wiring, plumbing and restrooms and to construct, acquire, modernize and equip classrooms, buildings and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $11,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 456, "no_votes": 241, "total_votes": 697, "percent_yes": 65.4232424677188, "percent_no": 34.576757532281206, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.075777", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.804040", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify for State matching funds, expand vocational education classrooms, upgrade electrical wiring, plumbing and restrooms and to construct, acquire, modernize and equip classrooms, buildings and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $11,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9215, "fingerprint": "2002|200200384|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200384|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c6cd6da294004948", "measure_id": "200200384", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 911 be adopted amending Section 3.30.70 of the City of Seaside Municipal Code entitled \"Tax Rate\", specifying that; a) any and all utility users tax collected shall be dedicated solely to police and fire protection services, and b) the utility users tax rate shall not exceed 6% unless decreased by resolution of the City Council.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2484, "no_votes": 1894, "total_votes": 4378, "percent_yes": 56.73823663773413, "percent_no": 43.26176336226587, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.083621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.806600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 911 be adopted amending Section 3.30.70 of the City of Seaside Municipal Code entitled \"Tax Rate\", specifying that; a) any and all utility users tax collected shall be dedicated solely to police and fire protection services, and b) the utility users tax rate shall not exceed 6% unless decreased by resolution of the City Council.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9223, "fingerprint": "2002|200200015|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200015|NAPA", "content_hash": "67577fec95e58a76", "measure_id": "200200015", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "An ordinance of the people of the County of Napa amending the Napa County Land Use Map in a manner that is consistent with the approval of Napa County General Plan Amendment No. GPA 00-01 by the board of supervisors on November 6, 2001 and reaffirming the decision of the Napa County Board of Supervisors which approved said General Plan Amendment on November 6, 2001.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12776, "no_votes": 12283, "total_votes": 25059, "percent_yes": 50.98367851869588, "percent_no": 49.01632148130412, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.107058", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.808510", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "An ordinance of the people of the County of Napa amending the Napa County Land Use Map in a manner that is consistent with the approval of Napa County General Plan Amendment No. GPA 00-01 by the board of supervisors on November 6, 2001 and reaffirming the decision of the Napa County Board of Supervisors which approved said General Plan Amendment on November 6, 2001.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9224, "fingerprint": "2002|200200016|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200016|NAPA", "content_hash": "96ba64cd02f0d13f", "measure_id": "200200016", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "An ordinance of the people of the County of Napa, State of California, adopting a change to the Napa County General Plan for the purpose of authorizing the creation of parcels two (2) acres or larger in size by direct conveyance or lease to a local government agency authorized to develop farm labor camps in areas of the county designated on the General Plan as agricultural resource or agricultural, watershed and open space, provided the use of such parcels is limited to providing farm labor camps owned or operated by a local government agency authorized to develop farm labor camps.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18891, "no_votes": 7527, "total_votes": 26418, "percent_yes": 71.50806268453327, "percent_no": 28.49193731546673, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.107405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.808733", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "An ordinance of the people of the County of Napa, State of California, adopting a change to the Napa County General Plan for the purpose of authorizing the creation of parcels two (2) acres or larger in size by direct conveyance or lease to a local government agency authorized to develop farm labor camps in areas of the county designated on the General Plan as agricultural resource or agricultural, watershed and open space, provided the use of such parcels is limited to providing farm labor camps owned or operated by a local government agency authorized to develop farm labor camps.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9226, "fingerprint": "2002|200200583|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200583|NAPA", "content_hash": "a1bcdf24d4914736", "measure_id": "200200583", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete identified repairs and rehabilitation projects at District schools; acquire sites; build and equip schools/classrooms to mitigate overcrowding; continue to replace deteriorating older school facilities; repair the earthquake damaged District Auditorium; improve fire/seismic safety and handicapped access; construct specified facilities, multiuse rooms and libraries; and qualify for State matching grants; shall Napa Valley Unified School District issue $95 million in bonds at lawful interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits and citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17183, "no_votes": 11770, "total_votes": 28953, "percent_yes": 59.34790867958415, "percent_no": 40.65209132041585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.108226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.809118", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete identified repairs and rehabilitation projects at District schools; acquire sites; build and equip schools/classrooms to mitigate overcrowding; continue to replace deteriorating older school facilities; repair the earthquake damaged District Auditorium; improve fire/seismic safety and handicapped access; construct specified facilities, multiuse rooms and libraries; and qualify for State matching grants; shall Napa Valley Unified School District issue $95 million in bonds at lawful interest rates, with guaranteed annual audits and citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9225, "fingerprint": "2002|200200582|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200582|NAPA", "content_hash": "13fc7cfd99b55cd4", "measure_id": "200200582", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for four-year colleges and jobs including nursing, law enforcement and business, retrain workers, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Napa Valley Community College District repair, acquire, equip, construct classrooms, buildings, libraries and labs; restore deteriorating roofs and grounds; improve disabled access; upgrade outdated technology, lighting, wiring, fire safety systems, plumbing and ventilation by issuing $133.8 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual financial audits, Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21539, "no_votes": 13705, "total_votes": 35244, "percent_yes": 61.11394847349904, "percent_no": 38.88605152650096, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.107749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.808935", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for four-year colleges and jobs including nursing, law enforcement and business, retrain workers, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Napa Valley Community College District repair, acquire, equip, construct classrooms, buildings, libraries and labs; restore deteriorating roofs and grounds; improve disabled access; upgrade outdated technology, lighting, wiring, fire safety systems, plumbing and ventilation by issuing $133.8 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual financial audits, Citizens' Oversight Committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9227, "fingerprint": "2002|200200154|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200154|NEVADA", "content_hash": "069a9dc60220ab6f", "measure_id": "200200154", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair local school classrooms and buildings and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the Nevada Joint Union High School District issue $15 million of bonds at legal interest rates, provide adequate classrooms for students, renovate, acquire and construct local school facilities, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or school operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16397, "no_votes": 10307, "total_votes": 26704, "percent_yes": 61.40278609946076, "percent_no": 38.59721390053924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.108597", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.809302", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair local school classrooms and buildings and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the Nevada Joint Union High School District issue $15 million of bonds at legal interest rates, provide adequate classrooms for students, renovate, acquire and construct local school facilities, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or school operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9228, "fingerprint": "2002|200200258|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200258|NEVADA", "content_hash": "61f0b5f622b988e2", "measure_id": "200200258", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Nevada County Ordinance 1967 be amended to continue the one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) retail transactions and user tax for the Nevada County Library System for an additional period of 15 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29370, "no_votes": 8969, "total_votes": 38339, "percent_yes": 76.60606692923655, "percent_no": 23.393933070763453, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.108891", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.809490", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Nevada County Ordinance 1967 be amended to continue the one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) retail transactions and user tax for the Nevada County Library System for an additional period of 15 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9229, "fingerprint": "2002|200200259|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200259|NEVADA", "content_hash": "0fbaa410dd376b11", "measure_id": "200200259", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring Nevada County to create a claims process to reimburse property owners when the market value of their property is reduced by County regulatory actions or determinations - not based upon a clear and present danger to public health and safety and traditionally recognized common law nuisance prohibitions - restricting existing use or utility of a parcel following denial of an owner proposed project seeking beneficial best use of the property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15824, "no_votes": 21061, "total_votes": 36885, "percent_yes": 42.90090822827708, "percent_no": 57.09909177172292, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.109165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.809676", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring Nevada County to create a claims process to reimburse property owners when the market value of their property is reduced by County regulatory actions or determinations - not based upon a clear and present danger to public health and safety and traditionally recognized common law nuisance prohibitions - restricting existing use or utility of a parcel following denial of an owner proposed project seeking beneficial best use of the property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9230, "fingerprint": "2002|200200385|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200385|NEVADA", "content_hash": "5683643d903ad3e9", "measure_id": "200200385", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall each parcel of improved real property be annually taxed for fire purposes as follows: single family/$24.00 each apt., condo, mobile/ $16.00; all commercially used property including but not limited to commercial, industrial, office, professional, retail, hotel/motel as follows; 1-5,000 sq ft/ $100.00; 5,001-7,500 /sq ft/ $150.00; 7,501-10,000 sq ft/ $200.00; 10,001-20,000 sq ft/ $300.00; 20,001-50,000 sq ft/ $400.00; 50,001 or greater/ $500.00?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 882, "no_votes": 353, "total_votes": 1235, "percent_yes": 71.417004048583, "percent_no": 28.582995951417004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.109466", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.809860", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall each parcel of improved real property be annually taxed for fire purposes as follows: single family/$24.00 each apt., condo, mobile/ $16.00; all commercially used property including but not limited to commercial, industrial, office, professional, retail, hotel/motel as follows; 1-5,000 sq ft/ $100.00; 5,001-7,500 /sq ft/ $150.00; 7,501-10,000 sq ft/ $200.00; 10,001-20,000 sq ft/ $300.00; 20,001-50,000 sq ft/ $400.00; 50,001 or greater/ $500.00?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9256, "fingerprint": "2002|200200260|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200260|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a231afed3c6680ca", "measure_id": "200200260", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County Campaign Reform Ordinance be repealed and reenacted to allow an increase in the campaign contribution limit only if approved by the voters, allow intra-candidate transfers of campaign funds, require additional reporting of late independent expenditures, allow the Board of Supervisors to establish an administrative procedure for the enforcement of the Ordinance, and make other changes in the Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 194016, "no_votes": 362643, "total_votes": 556659, "percent_yes": 34.85365367307454, "percent_no": 65.14634632692545, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.117081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.814578", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County Campaign Reform Ordinance be repealed and reenacted to allow an increase in the campaign contribution limit only if approved by the voters, allow intra-candidate transfers of campaign funds, require additional reporting of late independent expenditures, allow the Board of Supervisors to establish an administrative procedure for the enforcement of the Ordinance, and make other changes in the Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11956, "fingerprint": "2002|200200396|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200396|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fa93bf00f71af666", "measure_id": "200200396", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "ADVISORY VOTE ONLY. Use of the Utility User Tax. THIS MEASURE DOES NOT INCREASE TAXES AND IS NOT BINDING ON THE CITY COUNCIL. Shall a portion of the funds from any voter-approved increase in the City's Utility User's Tax be used for increases to City employee, including police emergency, compensation (salaries and/or benefits)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4339, "no_votes": 5387, "total_votes": 9726, "percent_yes": 44.61237918980053, "percent_no": 55.38762081019947, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.007892", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.120389", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.816750", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ADVISORY VOTE ONLY. Use of the Utility User Tax. THIS MEASURE DOES NOT INCREASE TAXES AND IS NOT BINDING ON THE CITY COUNCIL. Shall a portion of the funds from any voter-approved increase in the City's Utility User's Tax be used for increases to City employee, including police emergency, compensation (salaries and/or benefits)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9252, "fingerprint": "2002|200200158|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200158|ORANGE", "content_hash": "432d9217fc4188cf", "measure_id": "200200158", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/upgrade all Fullerton Joint Union High School District comprehensive schools, acquire/construct additional classrooms, science/computer labs, restrooms, libraries and school facilities to alleviate overcrowding and accommodate enrollment growth, address building safety/health issues including: upgrade electrical wiring and power, repair deteriorating restrooms/plumbing/food services and make other improvements to school sites and buildings, shall the Fullerton Joint Union High School District issue $67,940,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits with annual independent audits and Citizens Oversight Committee? 55% of vote required for passage.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19775, "no_votes": 13097, "total_votes": 32872, "percent_yes": 60.15758091993185, "percent_no": 39.84241908006815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.115856", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.813848", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/upgrade all Fullerton Joint Union High School District comprehensive schools, acquire/construct additional classrooms, science/computer labs, restrooms, libraries and school facilities to alleviate overcrowding and accommodate enrollment growth, address building safety/health issues including: upgrade electrical wiring and power, repair deteriorating restrooms/plumbing/food services and make other improvements to school sites and buildings, shall the Fullerton Joint Union High School District issue $67,940,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits with annual independent audits and Citizens Oversight Committee? 55% of vote required for passage.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9257, "fingerprint": "2002|200200261|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200261|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9237de738e558ba8", "measure_id": "200200261", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY) Prior to the transfer of ownership of MCAS El Toro, a toxic \"Superfund\" site, should the County demand from the Department of the Navy that the following conditions be met: 1)a complete and thorough study of the toxic contamination found or expected to be found at El Toro that incorporates and addresses the inconsistent toxic findings of the Department of the Navy's analysis, the local redevelopment authority's \"GeoSyntec Report,\" and the City of Irvine study entitled \"Navy's Underestimation of Solvent Contamination at the MCAS, El Toro;\" 2)remediation costs necessary for its intended use, including identification of funds to complete removal of all toxic contamination; 3)the identification of funds to reimburse the community for any direct or consequential damages or costs the community incurs as a result of contamination; and 4)that the actual clean-up of and remediation of El Torao must be complete prior to its transfer of sale?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 327087, "no_votes": 211596, "total_votes": 538683, "percent_yes": 60.71975540345621, "percent_no": 39.28024459654379, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.117353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.814759", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Prior to the transfer of ownership of MCAS El Toro, a toxic \"Superfund\" site, should the County demand from the Department of the Navy that the following conditions be met: 1)a complete and thorough study of the toxic contamination found or expected to be found at El Toro that incorporates and addresses the inconsistent toxic findings of the Department of the Navy's analysis, the local redevelopment authority's \"GeoSyntec Report,\" and the City of Irvine study entitled \"Navy's Underestimation of Solvent Contamination at the MCAS, El Toro;\" 2)remediation costs necessary for its intended use, including identification of funds to complete removal of all toxic contamination; 3)the identification of funds to reimburse the community for any direct or consequential damages or costs the community incurs as a result of contamination; and 4)that the actual clean-up of and remediation of El Torao must be complete prior to its transfer of sale?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11962, "fingerprint": "2002|200200406|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200406|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1f48d6328be64344", "measure_id": "200200406", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the permanent appropriations limit to the City be set at $10,623,045.00 with an increase of $5,000,000 over four years to prevent forfeiture of projected increases in revenue from non-residential development and preservation of state protected revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6816, "no_votes": 2480, "total_votes": 9296, "percent_yes": 73.32185886402753, "percent_no": 26.678141135972467, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.010035", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.123370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.818550", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the permanent appropriations limit to the City be set at $10,623,045.00 with an increase of $5,000,000 over four years to prevent forfeiture of projected increases in revenue from non-residential development and preservation of state protected revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9249, "fingerprint": "2002|200200155|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200155|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d6dbee901b7186fb", "measure_id": "200200155", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, repair, replace, and renovate aging neighborhood elementary schools, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Anaheim City (Elementary) School District, issue $110,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance the renovation, construction, acquisition and improvement of local school facilities and land, including replacing outdated wiring, lighting, plumbing and sewer systems, building permanent classrooms and new schools, with annual audits, no proceeds for administrators' salaries, and a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures? 55% of vote required for passage.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11610, "no_votes": 6756, "total_votes": 18366, "percent_yes": 63.21463573995426, "percent_no": 36.78536426004574, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.115026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.813301", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, repair, replace, and renovate aging neighborhood elementary schools, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Anaheim City (Elementary) School District, issue $110,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance the renovation, construction, acquisition and improvement of local school facilities and land, including replacing outdated wiring, lighting, plumbing and sewer systems, building permanent classrooms and new schools, with annual audits, no proceeds for administrators' salaries, and a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures? 55% of vote required for passage.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9272, "fingerprint": "2002|200200585|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200585|ORANGE", "content_hash": "7b6ca97f525f6af1", "measure_id": "200200585", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Orange Coast, Golden West and Coastline Community College Classroom Repair, Public Safety Education Measure. To prepare students for 4-year colleges and jobs, train nurses/police, by: Improving campus security/fire safety, repairing leaky roofs, upgrading wiring for computer technology, renovating deteriorating classrooms/libraries, repairing/acquiring/constructing/equipping buildings, sites, high-tech learning centers; shall Coast Community College District issue $370,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits, with no money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 90198, "no_votes": 48150, "total_votes": 138348, "percent_yes": 65.19646109810044, "percent_no": 34.80353890189956, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.126036", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.819648", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Orange Coast, Golden West and Coastline Community College Classroom Repair, Public Safety Education Measure. To prepare students for 4-year colleges and jobs, train nurses/police, by: Improving campus security/fire safety, repairing leaky roofs, upgrading wiring for computer technology, renovating deteriorating classrooms/libraries, repairing/acquiring/constructing/equipping buildings, sites, high-tech learning centers; shall Coast Community College District issue $370,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits, with no money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11963, "fingerprint": "2002|200200407|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200407|ORANGE", "content_hash": "42a1180aede5a5ba", "measure_id": "200200407", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance providing for the rezoning of 356 acres of real property known as Whispering Hills Estates (located on the west side of La Pata, just north of the Prima Deshecha Landfill) from the Growth Management District (\"GM\") to Planned Community District (\"PC\") for the purpose of allowing a high school and construction of 175 residential units be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4506, "no_votes": 5801, "total_votes": 10307, "percent_yes": 43.71786164742408, "percent_no": 56.28213835257592, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.010241", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.123690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.818736", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance providing for the rezoning of 356 acres of real property known as Whispering Hills Estates (located on the west side of La Pata, just north of the Prima Deshecha Landfill) from the Growth Management District (\"GM\") to Planned Community District (\"PC\") for the purpose of allowing a high school and construction of 175 residential units be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9251, "fingerprint": "2002|200200157|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200157|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a522aa4167952174", "measure_id": "200200157", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Fullerton School District, serving children from kindergarten through eighth grade, renovate aging classrooms, science and computer labs, and educational facilities; construct new classrooms to relieve overcrowding; upgrade inadequate electrical, plumbing, ventilation and safety systems; replace deteriorated roofing; add restrooms; and provide safety upgrades to exterior grounds and equipment by issuing $49,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates within legal limits, and provide for citizens' oversight, independent audits and with no funds used for administrative salaries? 55% of vote required for passage.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11710, "no_votes": 7316, "total_votes": 19026, "percent_yes": 61.547356249343, "percent_no": 38.452643750657, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.115585", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.813668", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Fullerton School District, serving children from kindergarten through eighth grade, renovate aging classrooms, science and computer labs, and educational facilities; construct new classrooms to relieve overcrowding; upgrade inadequate electrical, plumbing, ventilation and safety systems; replace deteriorated roofing; add restrooms; and provide safety upgrades to exterior grounds and equipment by issuing $49,700,000 in bonds at legal interest rates within legal limits, and provide for citizens' oversight, independent audits and with no funds used for administrative salaries? 55% of vote required for passage.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11964, "fingerprint": "2002|200200408|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200408|ORANGE", "content_hash": "d005bb12f9de6b89", "measure_id": "200200408", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "ADVISORY VOTE ONLY. Should the San Juan Capistrano Community Redevelopment Agency sell 13.22 acres of undeveloped real property, commonly referred to as the \"Lower Rosan property\" located north of Stonehill Drive between the railroad tracks and San Juan Creek, to the Home Depot Corporation for 9 million dollars?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3258, "no_votes": 7285, "total_votes": 10543, "percent_yes": 30.902020297827946, "percent_no": 69.09797970217205, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.010443", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.124130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.818919", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ADVISORY VOTE ONLY. Should the San Juan Capistrano Community Redevelopment Agency sell 13.22 acres of undeveloped real property, commonly referred to as the \"Lower Rosan property\" located north of Stonehill Drive between the railroad tracks and San Juan Creek, to the Home Depot Corporation for 9 million dollars?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9253, "fingerprint": "2002|200200159|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200159|ORANGE", "content_hash": "97cdf33b8ccba527", "measure_id": "200200159", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, repair existing schools, replace 35 year old roofs and classroom heating and ventilation systems, provide student access to modern technology, upgrade classroom electrical and fire alarm systems, replace deteriorating water and sewer systems, and qualify the District to receive, as available, $16,700,000 in state-matching funds shall the Huntington Beach City School District issue $30,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a citizen oversight committee and independent financial audits? 55% of vote required for passage.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11913, "no_votes": 7671, "total_votes": 19584, "percent_yes": 60.830269607843135, "percent_no": 39.169730392156865, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.116187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.814034", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, repair existing schools, replace 35 year old roofs and classroom heating and ventilation systems, provide student access to modern technology, upgrade classroom electrical and fire alarm systems, replace deteriorating water and sewer systems, and qualify the District to receive, as available, $16,700,000 in state-matching funds shall the Huntington Beach City School District issue $30,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a citizen oversight committee and independent financial audits? 55% of vote required for passage.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9273, "fingerprint": "2002|200200586|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200586|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6a0bcb7ee2c18783", "measure_id": "200200586", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Santa Ana College/Santiago Canyon College Student Safety, Classroom Repair/Technology Renovation Measure. To prepare students for 4-year colleges and jobs; Relieve overcrowding; Improve fire safety/security; Train teachers, nurses, firefighters, and police/sheriffs; Repair wiring/upgrade computer technology; Renovate libraries/classrooms; Repair/acquire/construct/equip college sites, buildings, laboratories and classrooms; shall Rancho Santiago Community College District issue $337,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51789, "no_votes": 28982, "total_votes": 80771, "percent_yes": 64.11830978940462, "percent_no": 35.88169021059538, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.126479", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.819831", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Santa Ana College/Santiago Canyon College Student Safety, Classroom Repair/Technology Renovation Measure. To prepare students for 4-year colleges and jobs; Relieve overcrowding; Improve fire safety/security; Train teachers, nurses, firefighters, and police/sheriffs; Repair wiring/upgrade computer technology; Renovate libraries/classrooms; Repair/acquire/construct/equip college sites, buildings, laboratories and classrooms; shall Rancho Santiago Community College District issue $337,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11965, "fingerprint": "2002|200200409|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200409|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c0abeb1b97d62fba", "measure_id": "200200409", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1485, which increases the Transient Occupancy Tax from 9% to 12% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4609, "no_votes": 4692, "total_votes": 9301, "percent_yes": 49.55381141812708, "percent_no": 50.44618858187292, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.010717", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.124557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.819100", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1485, which increases the Transient Occupancy Tax from 9% to 12% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9234, "fingerprint": "2002|200200065|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200065|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8e1998cf3e72f3b1", "measure_id": "200200065", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Property Rights Protection Measure. Shall the Charter City of the City of Huntington Beach be amended by adding a new section thereto providing that only a property owner can establish the price or terms regarding that property's sale, lease, rental, exchange or transfer; and prohibiting the City of Huntington Beach from legislating or regulating the price or terms concerning the sale, lease, rental, exchange or transfer of property (for example, by the adoption of a rent control ordinance)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27513, "no_votes": 12558, "total_votes": 40071, "percent_yes": 68.66062738638917, "percent_no": 31.339372613610834, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.110722", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.810585", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Property Rights Protection Measure. Shall the Charter City of the City of Huntington Beach be amended by adding a new section thereto providing that only a property owner can establish the price or terms regarding that property's sale, lease, rental, exchange or transfer; and prohibiting the City of Huntington Beach from legislating or regulating the price or terms concerning the sale, lease, rental, exchange or transfer of property (for example, by the adoption of a rent control ordinance)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11966, "fingerprint": "2002|200200410|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200410|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a3a5329ec83b46ff", "measure_id": "200200410", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to prohibit residential property rent control?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4567, "no_votes": 4697, "total_votes": 9264, "percent_yes": 49.29835924006908, "percent_no": 50.70164075993092, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.010930", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.125019", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.819282", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to prohibit residential property rent control?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9235, "fingerprint": "2002|200200066|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200066|ORANGE", "content_hash": "832b6501b917c338", "measure_id": "200200066", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Creation of Infrastructure Fund.  Shall the Huntington Beach Charter be amended to establish an \"Infrastructure Fund\" with all infrastructure revenues raised, and accrued interest, directed into the Fund; prohibiting the transfer of loan of Fund monies; requiring that General Fund expenditures for infrastructure not be reduced below 15% of General Fund revenues based on a five-year rolling average; and requiring that City Council designate an advisory board to annually review and audit the Infrastructure Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21314, "no_votes": 15667, "total_votes": 36981, "percent_yes": 57.63500175765935, "percent_no": 42.36499824234065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.111031", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.810769", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Creation of Infrastructure Fund.  Shall the Huntington Beach Charter be amended to establish an \"Infrastructure Fund\" with all infrastructure revenues raised, and accrued interest, directed into the Fund; prohibiting the transfer of loan of Fund monies; requiring that General Fund expenditures for infrastructure not be reduced below 15% of General Fund revenues based on a five-year rolling average; and requiring that City Council designate an advisory board to annually review and audit the Infrastructure Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9274, "fingerprint": "2002|200200587|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200587|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b3947b0f6d3afb3a", "measure_id": "200200587", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase safety, repair and renovate classrooms, restrooms, inadequate/aging infrastructure by rehabilitating, modernizing or replacing school facilities, including furniture/equipment, or the acquisition/lease of rental property for schools, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2002-1 of the Tustin Unified School District issue not to exceed $80,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with bond expenditures to benefit only local schools, with no money for administration/salaries, subject to strict citizen oversight as required by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12792, "no_votes": 6262, "total_votes": 19054, "percent_yes": 67.13550960428256, "percent_no": 32.86449039571744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.126919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.820013", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase safety, repair and renovate classrooms, restrooms, inadequate/aging infrastructure by rehabilitating, modernizing or replacing school facilities, including furniture/equipment, or the acquisition/lease of rental property for schools, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2002-1 of the Tustin Unified School District issue not to exceed $80,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, with bond expenditures to benefit only local schools, with no money for administration/salaries, subject to strict citizen oversight as required by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11955, "fingerprint": "2002|200200392|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200392|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6c67bc17bf25ced7", "measure_id": "200200392", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure GG which would repeal the 1.5% business utility user's tax paid by businesses but not residents in Irvine, be enacted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10071, "no_votes": 22979, "total_votes": 33050, "percent_yes": 30.47201210287443, "percent_no": 69.52798789712557, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.007092", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.119308", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.816024", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure GG which would repeal the 1.5% business utility user's tax paid by businesses but not residents in Irvine, be enacted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9236, "fingerprint": "2002|200200067|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200067|ORANGE", "content_hash": "421b74c7c50a2c31", "measure_id": "200200067", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Advisory Vote Only.  Infrastructure Fund. Power Plant Utility Tax. Should the Utility Tax paid solely by an electric power plant be placed into an Infrastructure Fund to be used only for the maintenance, construction and repair of infrastructure such as storm drains, storm water pump stations, alleys, streets, highways, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, bridges, trees, landscaped medians, parks, beach facilities, playgrounds, traffic signals, street lights, block walls along arterial highways and all public buildings and public ways?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21327, "no_votes": 15398, "total_votes": 36725, "percent_yes": 58.072157930565005, "percent_no": 41.927842069434995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.111375", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.810951", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Advisory Vote Only.  Infrastructure Fund. Power Plant Utility Tax. Should the Utility Tax paid solely by an electric power plant be placed into an Infrastructure Fund to be used only for the maintenance, construction and repair of infrastructure such as storm drains, storm water pump stations, alleys, streets, highways, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, bridges, trees, landscaped medians, parks, beach facilities, playgrounds, traffic signals, street lights, block walls along arterial highways and all public buildings and public ways?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9271, "fingerprint": "2002|200200584|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200584|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fc0bfd325e7d61e4", "measure_id": "200200584", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Centralia School District be authorized to finance classroom modernization; upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to technology; make health, safety, and security improvements; upgrade plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; repair and replace roofs, and qualify for State funds up to $11,000,000, by issuing $17,5000,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher of administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5760, "no_votes": 2829, "total_votes": 8589, "percent_yes": 67.06252183024799, "percent_no": 32.93747816975201, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.125458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.819464", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Centralia School District be authorized to finance classroom modernization; upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to technology; make health, safety, and security improvements; upgrade plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; repair and replace roofs, and qualify for State funds up to $11,000,000, by issuing $17,5000,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for teacher of administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9233, "fingerprint": "2002|200200064|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200064|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b38d382d8a24177d", "measure_id": "200200064", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Amendment of Gas Tax by Removing Electric Power Plant Exclusion. Shall the ordinance repealing the Gas Tax exclusion for electric power plants be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13098, "no_votes": 24974, "total_votes": 38072, "percent_yes": 34.403235973944106, "percent_no": 65.5967640260559, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gasoline Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.110420", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.810404", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Amendment of Gas Tax by Removing Electric Power Plant Exclusion. Shall the ordinance repealing the Gas Tax exclusion for electric power plants be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9258, "fingerprint": "2002|200200386|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200386|ORANGE", "content_hash": "5fbc0828bbb936d7", "measure_id": "200200386", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "BUENA PARK 9-1-1 POLICE, FIRE, AND PARAMEDIC SPECIAL TAX MEASURE To improve 9-1-1 reliability and response time; build a new police headquarters with a modern crime lab and earthquake-resistant Emergency Operations Center coordinating fire, paramedic, and police services, to upgrade computer hardware, software and communications systems for patrol cars; expand the City jail to include a new detention facility for juveniles, with independent audits, appropriations limit and a Citizens Oversight Committee monitoring budget, schedule, and project commitments; shall a special tax not to exceed $19 per year for a single family parcel (with rates for other parcels based on land use and size) be levied, as described in Resolution No. 11174?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8147, "no_votes": 4223, "total_votes": 12370, "percent_yes": 65.86095392077607, "percent_no": 34.13904607922393, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.117662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.814944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BUENA PARK 9-1-1 POLICE, FIRE, AND PARAMEDIC SPECIAL TAX MEASURE To improve 9-1-1 reliability and response time; build a new police headquarters with a modern crime lab and earthquake-resistant Emergency Operations Center coordinating fire, paramedic, and police services, to upgrade computer hardware, software and communications systems for patrol cars; expand the City jail to include a new detention facility for juveniles, with independent audits, appropriations limit and a Citizens Oversight Committee monitoring budget, schedule, and project commitments; shall a special tax not to exceed $19 per year for a single family parcel (with rates for other parcels based on land use and size) be levied, as described in Resolution No. 11174?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9237, "fingerprint": "2002|200200068|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200068|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0cd901f47486b32d", "measure_id": "200200068", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent reductions in general City services and programs, shall the existing utility user tax of 4.5% on electricity and 6% on other utilities, established by the City in 1992 and amended in 2001, be affirmed and ratified provided that low income seniors and the disabled remain exempt from the tax, an annual audit is conducted, and the tax terminates on December 31, 2007?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4387, "no_votes": 4272, "total_votes": 8659, "percent_yes": 50.66404896639335, "percent_no": 49.33595103360665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.111649", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.811138", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent reductions in general City services and programs, shall the existing utility user tax of 4.5% on electricity and 6% on other utilities, established by the City in 1992 and amended in 2001, be affirmed and ratified provided that low income seniors and the disabled remain exempt from the tax, an annual audit is conducted, and the tax terminates on December 31, 2007?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9259, "fingerprint": "2002|200200387|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200387|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c3766ef5602a2bde", "measure_id": "200200387", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 600 of the City Charter of Cypress be amended to change the language of the residency requirement of the City Manager, which has been ruled unconstitutional under the California Constitution, Article XI, section 10, subdivision (b)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6138, "no_votes": 4247, "total_votes": 10385, "percent_yes": 59.1044776119403, "percent_no": 40.8955223880597, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.117970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.815125", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 600 of the City Charter of Cypress be amended to change the language of the residency requirement of the City Manager, which has been ruled unconstitutional under the California Constitution, Article XI, section 10, subdivision (b)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9238, "fingerprint": "2002|200200069|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200069|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fb339e54be770fc8", "measure_id": "200200069", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Initiative Ordinance 01-01, approving and maintaining the utility users tax in effect in La Palma since January, 1994, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1816, "no_votes": 927, "total_votes": 2743, "percent_yes": 66.20488516223114, "percent_no": 33.795114837768864, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.111953", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.811335", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Initiative Ordinance 01-01, approving and maintaining the utility users tax in effect in La Palma since January, 1994, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9260, "fingerprint": "2002|200200388|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200388|ORANGE", "content_hash": "df57deef2bb1e2eb", "measure_id": "200200388", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 802 and 805 of the City Charter of the City of Cypress be amended to require that appointments to fill a vacancy on a Board or Commission be made for the unexpired term of said office in order to preserve continuity of the advisory group?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7523, "no_votes": 2865, "total_votes": 10388, "percent_yes": 72.42010011551791, "percent_no": 27.57989988448209, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.118243", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.815304", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 802 and 805 of the City Charter of the City of Cypress be amended to require that appointments to fill a vacancy on a Board or Commission be made for the unexpired term of said office in order to preserve continuity of the advisory group?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9239, "fingerprint": "2002|200200070|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200070|ORANGE", "content_hash": "05f726c95ebb16bd", "measure_id": "200200070", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that residency requirements for elected officials and the city manager be governed by State law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6100, "no_votes": 1405, "total_votes": 7505, "percent_yes": 81.27914723517655, "percent_no": 18.720852764823448, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.112222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.811516", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that residency requirements for elected officials and the city manager be governed by State law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9261, "fingerprint": "2002|200200389|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200389|ORANGE", "content_hash": "027da46541a4702f", "measure_id": "200200389", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fountain Valley prohibit the parking of recreational vehicles with a length in excess of twenty-two (22) feet, a width of eighty-four (84) inches or a weight in excess of 10,000 lbs. On residential streets, with loading and unloading, visitor and medical necessity exceptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9700, "no_votes": 5215, "total_votes": 14915, "percent_yes": 65.03519946362722, "percent_no": 34.96480053637278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.118509", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.815482", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fountain Valley prohibit the parking of recreational vehicles with a length in excess of twenty-two (22) feet, a width of eighty-four (84) inches or a weight in excess of 10,000 lbs. On residential streets, with loading and unloading, visitor and medical necessity exceptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9240, "fingerprint": "2002|200200071|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200071|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a5606b68b5c590a2", "measure_id": "200200071", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that meetings of the City Council and appointive boards/commissions shall be held in accordance with State law (the Brown Act)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6302, "no_votes": 992, "total_votes": 7294, "percent_yes": 86.39978064162325, "percent_no": 13.600219358376748, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.112494", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.811696", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that meetings of the City Council and appointive boards/commissions shall be held in accordance with State law (the Brown Act)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9262, "fingerprint": "2002|200200390|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200390|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200200390", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12283, "no_votes": 11323, "total_votes": 23606, "percent_yes": 52.03338134372617, "percent_no": 47.96661865627383, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.118776", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.815664", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9241, "fingerprint": "2002|200200072|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200072|ORANGE", "content_hash": "22f36be2de2cb485", "measure_id": "200200072", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to remove limitations on the ability of the City to enforce its Ordinances?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4554, "no_votes": 2650, "total_votes": 7204, "percent_yes": 63.21488062187674, "percent_no": 36.78511937812326, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.112770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.811878", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to remove limitations on the ability of the City to enforce its Ordinances?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9263, "fingerprint": "2002|200200391|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200391|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2530ae0125234188", "measure_id": "200200391", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance which increases the hotel visitors tax from 10% to 13% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16114, "no_votes": 12874, "total_votes": 28988, "percent_yes": 55.58851938733269, "percent_no": 44.41148061266731, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.119040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.815842", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance which increases the hotel visitors tax from 10% to 13% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9242, "fingerprint": "2002|200200073|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200073|ORANGE", "content_hash": "0402fb10051e0b00", "measure_id": "200200073", "measure_letter": "NN", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to increase the penalty for violations of the Charter from $500 to $1,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4666, "no_votes": 2535, "total_votes": 7201, "percent_yes": 64.79655603388417, "percent_no": 35.20344396611583, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.113038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.812057", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to increase the penalty for violations of the Charter from $500 to $1,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9264, "fingerprint": "2002|200200393|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200393|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fb3ad8082f102fc3", "measure_id": "200200393", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the permanent appropriations limit of the City of Laguna Woods be set at $4,165,544?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7546, "no_votes": 1870, "total_votes": 9416, "percent_yes": 80.14018691588785, "percent_no": 19.859813084112147, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.119583", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.816203", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the permanent appropriations limit of the City of Laguna Woods be set at $4,165,544?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9243, "fingerprint": "2002|200200074|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200074|ORANGE", "content_hash": "34a411b39338fb6d", "measure_id": "200200074", "measure_letter": "OO", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that prohibited financial interests in City contracts shall be governed by State law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5860, "no_votes": 1306, "total_votes": 7166, "percent_yes": 81.77504884175272, "percent_no": 18.22495115824728, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.113303", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.812235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that prohibited financial interests in City contracts shall be governed by State law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9265, "fingerprint": "2002|200200394|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200394|ORANGE", "content_hash": "efbf80998da7b7d3", "measure_id": "200200394", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit of the City of Laguna Woods be increased during Fiscal Years 2002-03 through 2005-06 for the statutory increase in motor-vehicle-in-lieu fees provided to newly incorporated cities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6672, "no_votes": 2769, "total_votes": 9441, "percent_yes": 70.67047982205274, "percent_no": 29.32952017794726, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.119851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.816387", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit of the City of Laguna Woods be increased during Fiscal Years 2002-03 through 2005-06 for the statutory increase in motor-vehicle-in-lieu fees provided to newly incorporated cities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9244, "fingerprint": "2002|200200075|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200075|ORANGE", "content_hash": "66721dc59421a7fb", "measure_id": "200200075", "measure_letter": "PP", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that a two-year budget may be prepared upon the determination of the City manager?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4678, "no_votes": 2474, "total_votes": 7152, "percent_yes": 65.4082774049217, "percent_no": 34.591722595078295, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.113569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.812412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that a two-year budget may be prepared upon the determination of the City manager?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9266, "fingerprint": "2002|200200395|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200395|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9da59408cbb7d591", "measure_id": "200200395", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ordinance 540 remain in effect, continuing the existing, and not to exceed, six (6) percent utility users tax in the City of Los Alamitos to fund general city services such as police, parks, children's and senior programs, and street repairs, and further, that low-income households (regardless of age) remain exempt from the tax, and that the tax is subject to annual fiscal review?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1807, "no_votes": 867, "total_votes": 2674, "percent_yes": 67.57666417352281, "percent_no": 32.423335826477185, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.120120", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.816567", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ordinance 540 remain in effect, continuing the existing, and not to exceed, six (6) percent utility users tax in the City of Los Alamitos to fund general city services such as police, parks, children's and senior programs, and street repairs, and further, that low-income households (regardless of age) remain exempt from the tax, and that the tax is subject to annual fiscal review?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9245, "fingerprint": "2002|200200076|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200076|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f0ebd283c695c2e3", "measure_id": "200200076", "measure_letter": "QQ", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that the City Council may enter into \"design-build\" public works contracts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3775, "no_votes": 3471, "total_votes": 7246, "percent_yes": 52.0977090808722, "percent_no": 47.9022909191278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.113904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.812589", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that the City Council may enter into \"design-build\" public works contracts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9267, "fingerprint": "2002|200200397|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200397|ORANGE", "content_hash": "13d65409411d4292", "measure_id": "200200397", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 600 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to limit to three consecutive terms the number of terms of office to which a person can be elected as a member of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7322, "no_votes": 2995, "total_votes": 10317, "percent_yes": 70.97024328777746, "percent_no": 29.029756712222536, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.120659", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.816932", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 600 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to limit to three consecutive terms the number of terms of office to which a person can be elected as a member of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9246, "fingerprint": "2002|200200077|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200077|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f0ebd283c695c2e3", "measure_id": "200200077", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that the City Council may enter into \"design-build\" public works contracts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4041, "no_votes": 2899, "total_votes": 6940, "percent_yes": 58.22766570605188, "percent_no": 41.77233429394812, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.114173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.812769", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that the City Council may enter into \"design-build\" public works contracts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9268, "fingerprint": "2002|200200398|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200398|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4df31d5665ce95c9", "measure_id": "200200398", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 602 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to provide for three (3) annual increases of $100.00 per month in the compensation to be paid to the Mayor and the Members of City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3532, "no_votes": 6707, "total_votes": 10239, "percent_yes": 34.4955562066608, "percent_no": 65.50444379333919, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.120927", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.817115", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 602 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to provide for three (3) annual increases of $100.00 per month in the compensation to be paid to the Mayor and the Members of City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9247, "fingerprint": "2002|200200078|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200078|ORANGE", "content_hash": "aa306f49fbbb554e", "measure_id": "200200078", "measure_letter": "SS", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be universally amended to eliminate all gender-based designations, i.e., \"he,\" \"his,\" etc.?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4395, "no_votes": 2836, "total_votes": 7231, "percent_yes": 60.77997510717743, "percent_no": 39.22002489282257, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.114481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.812947", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be universally amended to eliminate all gender-based designations, i.e., \"he,\" \"his,\" etc.?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9269, "fingerprint": "2002|200200399|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200399|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6c5c8bfe4ad5883a", "measure_id": "200200399", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 604 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to clarify the date on which the City Council elects a Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8095, "no_votes": 1984, "total_votes": 10079, "percent_yes": 80.3155074908225, "percent_no": 19.684492509177502, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.121194", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.817292", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 604 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to clarify the date on which the City Council elects a Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9248, "fingerprint": "2002|200200079|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200079|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a6deaac2be416c78", "measure_id": "200200079", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that disciplinary suspensions shall be in accordance with progressive discipline standards of practice?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5629, "no_votes": 1260, "total_votes": 6889, "percent_yes": 81.70997241979968, "percent_no": 18.290027580200316, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.114754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.813125", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Seal Beach be amended to provide that disciplinary suspensions shall be in accordance with progressive discipline standards of practice?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9270, "fingerprint": "2002|200200400|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200400|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b7be6066e7c0f59d", "measure_id": "200200400", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 608 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to require competitive bidding on public works projects involving an expenditure of more than $25,000.00, or in the alternative, to provide for the award of public works contracts by a best value process, including design build and construction manager at risk approaches, as approved by the City Council and adopted by ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7460, "no_votes": 2563, "total_votes": 10023, "percent_yes": 74.42881372842463, "percent_no": 25.57118627157537, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.121463", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.817472", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 608 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to require competitive bidding on public works projects involving an expenditure of more than $25,000.00, or in the alternative, to provide for the award of public works contracts by a best value process, including design build and construction manager at risk approaches, as approved by the City Council and adopted by ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11957, "fingerprint": "2002|200200401|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200401|ORANGE", "content_hash": "bbd4d4668e98f211", "measure_id": "200200401", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 620 and 1401 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to provide (1) that punishment for violating the provisions of the City Municipal Code and City Charter be increased to the maximum extent provided by state law and (2) for recovery by the City of its investigation and enforcement costs relating to violation of the City Municipal Code and City Charter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6545, "no_votes": 3318, "total_votes": 9863, "percent_yes": 66.35911994322214, "percent_no": 33.64088005677786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.008936", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.121770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.817651", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 620 and 1401 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to provide (1) that punishment for violating the provisions of the City Municipal Code and City Charter be increased to the maximum extent provided by state law and (2) for recovery by the City of its investigation and enforcement costs relating to violation of the City Municipal Code and City Charter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9231, "fingerprint": "2002|200200017|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200017|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8d019c7b21d3b009", "measure_id": "200200017", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the measure entitled \"County of Orange Proposed Charter,\" which would result in Orange County becoming a charter county and changing the method of selection when a vacancy occurs in the Board of Supervisors, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 240476, "no_votes": 215186, "total_votes": 455662, "percent_yes": 52.7750832854177, "percent_no": 47.2249167145823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.109740", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.810040", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure entitled \"County of Orange Proposed Charter,\" which would result in Orange County becoming a charter county and changing the method of selection when a vacancy occurs in the Board of Supervisors, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11958, "fingerprint": "2002|200200402|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200402|ORANGE", "content_hash": "294e16c08cce5196", "measure_id": "200200402", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 902 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to provide for staggered terms of office for members of City boards and commissions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6638, "no_votes": 3135, "total_votes": 9773, "percent_yes": 67.92182543742965, "percent_no": 32.078174562570354, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.009158", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.122137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.817829", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 902 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to provide for staggered terms of office for members of City boards and commissions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9232, "fingerprint": "2002|200200018|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200018|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f6de3bf78ad0eb5f", "measure_id": "200200018", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the initiative measure: 1) eliminating planned airport uses at the closed El Toro Marine Corps Air Station (\"MCAS El Toro\") by repealing Measure a, and 2) amending the Orange County General Plan to authorize an urban regional park and a variety of agricultural, material recovery/recycling, recreational, cultural, educational, employment, public and housing land uses at MCAS El Toro, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 297735, "no_votes": 216026, "total_votes": 513761, "percent_yes": 57.95204384918279, "percent_no": 42.04795615081721, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.110084", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.810220", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the initiative measure: 1) eliminating planned airport uses at the closed El Toro Marine Corps Air Station (\"MCAS El Toro\") by repealing Measure a, and 2) amending the Orange County General Plan to authorize an urban regional park and a variety of agricultural, material recovery/recycling, recreational, cultural, educational, employment, public and housing land uses at MCAS El Toro, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11959, "fingerprint": "2002|200200403|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200403|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c295fdd0c1fc72d1", "measure_id": "200200403", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1300 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to specify cable television as a utility for which the City Council may grant a franchise?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5426, "no_votes": 4322, "total_votes": 9748, "percent_yes": 55.662700041034064, "percent_no": 44.337299958965936, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.009415", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.122431", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.818007", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1300 of the Charter of the City of Placentia be amended to specify cable television as a utility for which the City Council may grant a franchise?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9254, "fingerprint": "2002|200200160|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200160|ORANGE", "content_hash": "57229ae4713c21e6", "measure_id": "200200160", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare Fullerton and Cypress College students for jobs and four-year colleges; relieve student overcrowding; upgrade electrical wiring for advanced technology training and lighting for student safety; expand parking facilities; qualify for state matching funds; construct/acquire/modernize/equip facilities, classrooms and sites, shall North Orange Community College District issue $239,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure that no bond money issued for salaries or other administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68222, "no_votes": 50069, "total_votes": 118291, "percent_yes": 57.673026688420926, "percent_no": 42.326973311579074, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.116459", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.814215", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare Fullerton and Cypress College students for jobs and four-year colleges; relieve student overcrowding; upgrade electrical wiring for advanced technology training and lighting for student safety; expand parking facilities; qualify for state matching funds; construct/acquire/modernize/equip facilities, classrooms and sites, shall North Orange Community College District issue $239,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure that no bond money issued for salaries or other administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11960, "fingerprint": "2002|200200404|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200404|ORANGE", "content_hash": "dded7d0d2c86a0db", "measure_id": "200200404", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article VII of the Charter of the City of Placentia be repealed and Sections 800 and 1211 of the Charter be amended to change the elected offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer to offices appointed by the City Administrator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2826, "no_votes": 6709, "total_votes": 9535, "percent_yes": 29.63817514420556, "percent_no": 70.36182485579444, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.009622", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.122721", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.818189", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article VII of the Charter of the City of Placentia be repealed and Sections 800 and 1211 of the Charter be amended to change the elected offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer to offices appointed by the City Administrator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9255, "fingerprint": "2002|200200161|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200161|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b251c385b0b65efd", "measure_id": "200200161", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize all Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District schools; upgrade classrooms, science/computer labs, and libraries; construct a high school, middle school and elementary schools to alleviate overcrowding; qualify for state grants; acquire furniture and equipment; address building safety issues including electrical capacity, deteriorating restrooms/plumbing and HVAC; and make other improvements to school facilities, shall the District issue $102,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing annual audits and establishing a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18300, "no_votes": 9435, "total_votes": 27735, "percent_yes": 65.98161168199026, "percent_no": 34.01838831800974, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.116739", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.814394", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize all Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District schools; upgrade classrooms, science/computer labs, and libraries; construct a high school, middle school and elementary schools to alleviate overcrowding; qualify for state grants; acquire furniture and equipment; address building safety issues including electrical capacity, deteriorating restrooms/plumbing and HVAC; and make other improvements to school facilities, shall the District issue $102,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, providing annual audits and establishing a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11961, "fingerprint": "2002|200200405|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200405|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fe7968eadd2a55b8", "measure_id": "200200405", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "INITIATIVE ORDINANCE NO. 2002-01: Shall Sections 3.28.020(a), 3.28.030(a), 3.28040(a) and 3.28.060 of the Municipal Code of the City of Plancentia be amended to restore the City's utility user tax to the previously existing rate of five percent (5%) on telephone, electricity, gas and cable television use?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3648, "no_votes": 6170, "total_votes": 9818, "percent_yes": 37.156243634141376, "percent_no": 62.843756365858624, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.009824", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.123053", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.818370", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "INITIATIVE ORDINANCE NO. 2002-01: Shall Sections 3.28.020(a), 3.28.030(a), 3.28040(a) and 3.28.060 of the Municipal Code of the City of Plancentia be amended to restore the City's utility user tax to the previously existing rate of five percent (5%) on telephone, electricity, gas and cable television use?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9250, "fingerprint": "2002|200200156|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200156|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a0ce7ca10ba5ab36", "measure_id": "200200156", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify the District to receive $125,000,000 in State matching funds, relieve existing student overcrowding, construct classrooms, build a new junior high school, replace inadequate electrical systems, provide students with access to modern technology, upgrade fire safety systems, remove asbestos, and make seismic repairs, shall the Anaheim Union High School District issue $132,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a detailed project list, a citizen oversight committee and independent audits? 55% of vote required for passage.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25592, "no_votes": 15534, "total_votes": 41126, "percent_yes": 62.22827408452074, "percent_no": 37.77172591547926, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.115307", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.813485", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify the District to receive $125,000,000 in State matching funds, relieve existing student overcrowding, construct classrooms, build a new junior high school, replace inadequate electrical systems, provide students with access to modern technology, upgrade fire safety systems, remove asbestos, and make seismic repairs, shall the Anaheim Union High School District issue $132,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a detailed project list, a citizen oversight committee and independent audits? 55% of vote required for passage.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9276, "fingerprint": "2002|200200163|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200163|PLACER", "content_hash": "35a1cf50d41df430", "measure_id": "200200163", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $265 Million dollars in bonds at the lowest available interest rate, for building and repairing classrooms and facilities; upgrading academic and vocational education programs including computer sciences, electronics, nursing and high-tech training facilities; upgrading libraries; building new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and making building safety improvements at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College Campuses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37, "no_votes": 72, "total_votes": 109, "percent_yes": 33.94495412844037, "percent_no": 66.05504587155963, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.127903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.820462", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $265 Million dollars in bonds at the lowest available interest rate, for building and repairing classrooms and facilities; upgrading academic and vocational education programs including computer sciences, electronics, nursing and high-tech training facilities; upgrading libraries; building new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and making building safety improvements at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College Campuses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9278, "fingerprint": "2002|200200165|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200165|PLACER", "content_hash": "8762d5bd2ede237d", "measure_id": "200200165", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, shall the Rocklin Unified School District issue bonds for the construction of a new high school and other educational facilities, including the acquisition of the land where the high school will be located, in an amount not to exceed $52,000,000 with interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7101, "no_votes": 3399, "total_votes": 10500, "percent_yes": 67.62857142857143, "percent_no": 32.37142857142857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.128770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.820832", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, shall the Rocklin Unified School District issue bonds for the construction of a new high school and other educational facilities, including the acquisition of the land where the high school will be located, in an amount not to exceed $52,000,000 with interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9275, "fingerprint": "2002|200200162|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200162|PLACER", "content_hash": "e3f009250bf664ff", "measure_id": "200200162", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and rehabilitate school buildings for student health and safety, qualify for State matching funds, upgrade inadequate plumbing, electrical, heating and ventilation systems, renovate restrooms, repair deteriorating roofs, repair dry rot, upgrade fire safety systems, provide needed classrooms and make other improvements to school sites and buildings, shall Grant Joint Union High School District issue $74 million of bonds at any legally authorized interest rates, with annual audits and citizens oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40, "no_votes": 69, "total_votes": 109, "percent_yes": 36.69724770642202, "percent_no": 63.30275229357798, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.127395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.820196", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and rehabilitate school buildings for student health and safety, qualify for State matching funds, upgrade inadequate plumbing, electrical, heating and ventilation systems, renovate restrooms, repair deteriorating roofs, repair dry rot, upgrade fire safety systems, provide needed classrooms and make other improvements to school sites and buildings, shall Grant Joint Union High School District issue $74 million of bonds at any legally authorized interest rates, with annual audits and citizens oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9277, "fingerprint": "2002|200200164|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200164|PLACER", "content_hash": "bef44c7dc1a7e909", "measure_id": "200200164", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make improvements to real property for authorized school purposes, including constructing a new Community Center, upgrading electrical systems, improving facilities for student safety, and providing additional parking, classroom, recreational, and office space, shall the Penryn School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $3,000,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 399, "no_votes": 563, "total_votes": 962, "percent_yes": 41.47609147609147, "percent_no": 58.52390852390853, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.128339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.820652", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make improvements to real property for authorized school purposes, including constructing a new Community Center, upgrading electrical systems, improving facilities for student safety, and providing additional parking, classroom, recreational, and office space, shall the Penryn School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $3,000,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9283, "fingerprint": "2002|200200589|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200589|PLACER", "content_hash": "3ffbd751dc5b2fda", "measure_id": "200200589", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Roseville City Elementary School District repair local elementary schools and sites; improve safety conditions; upgrade wiring for technology/fire alarms/emergency communication systems; install energy efficient heating/cooling systems; replace aging plumbing, fix leaky roofs/bathrooms; remove asbestos; repair, acquire, construct, equip school multipurpose rooms, facilities, and classrooms; qualify for State matching funds; by issuing $29,117,071 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11174, "no_votes": 7045, "total_votes": 18219, "percent_yes": 61.33157692518799, "percent_no": 38.66842307481201, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.131223", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.821757", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Roseville City Elementary School District repair local elementary schools and sites; improve safety conditions; upgrade wiring for technology/fire alarms/emergency communication systems; install energy efficient heating/cooling systems; replace aging plumbing, fix leaky roofs/bathrooms; remove asbestos; repair, acquire, construct, equip school multipurpose rooms, facilities, and classrooms; qualify for State matching funds; by issuing $29,117,071 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9285, "fingerprint": "2002|200200591|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200591|PLACER", "content_hash": "7f2f7065a536b38e", "measure_id": "200200591", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve North Tahoe High and Middle Schools by replacing, constructing, upgrading, and equipping classrooms, library, technology center, aging water system, improving campus safety and security, qualifying for any available State matching funds, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Tahoe-Truckee Unified School district issue $30,450,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to perform annual financial audits to ensure that bond funds are spent for the designated projects and for the benefit of students and the community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1912, "no_votes": 1430, "total_votes": 3342, "percent_yes": 57.21125074805505, "percent_no": 42.78874925194495, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.132094", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.822123", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve North Tahoe High and Middle Schools by replacing, constructing, upgrading, and equipping classrooms, library, technology center, aging water system, improving campus safety and security, qualifying for any available State matching funds, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Tahoe-Truckee Unified School district issue $30,450,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to perform annual financial audits to ensure that bond funds are spent for the designated projects and for the benefit of students and the community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9284, "fingerprint": "2002|200200590|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200590|PLACER", "content_hash": "6d46d520606c9028", "measure_id": "200200590", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve school overcrowding and enhance student safety; to design, acquire property, construct and equip a new high school; to provide new classrooms and related facilities on existing campuses, and to remain current with new technology, shall Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $65.3 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18027, "no_votes": 17865, "total_votes": 35892, "percent_yes": 50.22567703109328, "percent_no": 49.77432296890672, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.131661", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.821942", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve school overcrowding and enhance student safety; to design, acquire property, construct and equip a new high school; to provide new classrooms and related facilities on existing campuses, and to remain current with new technology, shall Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $65.3 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9282, "fingerprint": "2002|200200588|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200588|PLACER", "content_hash": "161cb5e815062b91", "measure_id": "200200588", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to modern technology, construct and expand student support facilities, upgrade plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, construct classrooms, and qualify the District for $1,000,000 in State-matching funds, shall the Elverta Joint Elementary School District Issue $10,500,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring a citizens oversight committee and annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64, "no_votes": 76, "total_votes": 140, "percent_yes": 45.71428571428571, "percent_no": 54.28571428571429, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.130575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.821568", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to modern technology, construct and expand student support facilities, upgrade plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, construct classrooms, and qualify the District for $1,000,000 in State-matching funds, shall the Elverta Joint Elementary School District Issue $10,500,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring a citizens oversight committee and annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9280, "fingerprint": "2002|200200411|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200411|PLACER", "content_hash": "5419ee2a531c60d8", "measure_id": "200200411", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance repealing the ban on speed bumps and speed dips be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1578, "no_votes": 3215, "total_votes": 4793, "percent_yes": 32.92301272689338, "percent_no": 67.07698727310662, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.129642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.821201", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance repealing the ban on speed bumps and speed dips be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9279, "fingerprint": "2002|200200262|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200262|PLACER", "content_hash": "8f507b030cd846df", "measure_id": "200200262", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Placer County Code, Chapter 3, Section 3.12.040 (also known as Measure F) be amended to remove that section in its entirety, thereby repealing that provision which requires Placer County Sheriff Deputy salaries be set by averaging the Sheriff Deputy salaries of Nevada County, Sacramento County and El Dorado County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39400, "no_votes": 46425, "total_votes": 85825, "percent_yes": 45.9073696475386, "percent_no": 54.0926303524614, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.129206", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.821015", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Placer County Code, Chapter 3, Section 3.12.040 (also known as Measure F) be amended to remove that section in its entirety, thereby repealing that provision which requires Placer County Sheriff Deputy salaries be set by averaging the Sheriff Deputy salaries of Nevada County, Sacramento County and El Dorado County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9281, "fingerprint": "2002|200200412|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200412|PLACER", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200200412", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 247, "no_votes": 204, "total_votes": 451, "percent_yes": 54.76718403547672, "percent_no": 45.23281596452328, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.130077", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.821385", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11968, "fingerprint": "2002|200200592|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200592|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "e47af66ee31b3ad1", "measure_id": "200200592", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair old local area schools and extend their useful life; repair or replace leaky roofs; install safe, energy efficient windows; upgrade heating and cooling systems; replace aging plumbing, floors, replace/fix bathrooms; upgrade wiring to accommodate technology and meet safety standards; and quality for State grants, shall Plumas Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5206, "no_votes": 2529, "total_votes": 7735, "percent_yes": 67.30446024563672, "percent_no": 32.69553975436328, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.014845", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.133950", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.822855", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair old local area schools and extend their useful life; repair or replace leaky roofs; install safe, energy efficient windows; upgrade heating and cooling systems; replace aging plumbing, floors, replace/fix bathrooms; upgrade wiring to accommodate technology and meet safety standards; and quality for State grants, shall Plumas Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9286, "fingerprint": "2002|200200019|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200019|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "cc96e91f20ea8e3c", "measure_id": "200200019", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Eastern Plumas Recreation and Parks District be formed with the same boundaries as the Eastern Plumas Health Care District, excluding the legal boundaries of the City of Portola, to provide for development, operation, and maintenance of recreation property, programs, and facilities in the area, without an assessment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 947, "no_votes": 604, "total_votes": 1551, "percent_yes": 61.05738233397808, "percent_no": 38.94261766602192, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.132529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.822304", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Eastern Plumas Recreation and Parks District be formed with the same boundaries as the Eastern Plumas Health Care District, excluding the legal boundaries of the City of Portola, to provide for development, operation, and maintenance of recreation property, programs, and facilities in the area, without an assessment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 11967, "fingerprint": "2002|200200414|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200414|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "200200414", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 162, "no_votes": 390, "total_votes": 552, "percent_yes": 29.34782608695652, "percent_no": 70.65217391304348, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.014623", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.133492", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.822672", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9287, "fingerprint": "2002|200200413|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200413|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "d4153c36f3caa3d2", "measure_id": "200200413", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 152, "no_votes": 399, "total_votes": 551, "percent_yes": 27.58620689655172, "percent_no": 72.41379310344828, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.133030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.822488", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9293, "fingerprint": "2002|200200263|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200263|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f7aa2a01f7df1d67", "measure_id": "200200263", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To relieve traffic congestion, improve safety and air quality shall Measure A (Riverside County Transportation Commission Ordinance No. 02-001) be approved to extend for thirty (30) years the current 1/2 cent sales tax to: Widen/improve routes 10, 15, 60, 71, 79, 86, 91, 111 and the 15/91 and 10/60 interchanges; Maintain community streets; Expand transit for seniors and persons with disabilities; Expand Metrolink commuter rail; Conduct independent financial audits and authorize bonds up to $500 million?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 203709, "no_votes": 90660, "total_votes": 294369, "percent_yes": 69.20192003913456, "percent_no": 30.798079960865437, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.136662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.824402", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve traffic congestion, improve safety and air quality shall Measure A (Riverside County Transportation Commission Ordinance No. 02-001) be approved to extend for thirty (30) years the current 1/2 cent sales tax to: Widen/improve routes 10, 15, 60, 71, 79, 86, 91, 111 and the 15/91 and 10/60 interchanges; Maintain community streets; Expand transit for seniors and persons with disabilities; Expand Metrolink commuter rail; Conduct independent financial audits and authorize bonds up to $500 million?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9295, "fingerprint": "2002|200200416|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200416|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ed2b415fd715f2fa", "measure_id": "200200416", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the purposed City Charter for the City of Desert Hot Springs be adopted so that the laws of the City shall prevail over general state law with respect to local municipal affairs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1351, "no_votes": 929, "total_votes": 2280, "percent_yes": 59.25438596491228, "percent_no": 40.74561403508772, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.137658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.824998", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the purposed City Charter for the City of Desert Hot Springs be adopted so that the laws of the City shall prevail over general state law with respect to local municipal affairs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9288, "fingerprint": "2002|200200080|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200080|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "04fbd58907587c1f", "measure_id": "200200080", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize the levy of a special tax on each eligible parcel in the City to fund fire protection and paramedic services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2666, "no_votes": 1345, "total_votes": 4011, "percent_yes": 66.46721515831463, "percent_no": 33.53278484168537, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.134385", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.823040", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to authorize the levy of a special tax on each eligible parcel in the City to fund fire protection and paramedic services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9296, "fingerprint": "2002|200200417|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200417|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "85a6549b0490a737", "measure_id": "200200417", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of the Office of the Mayor of Desert Hot Springs increase from two years to four years, beginning with the 2003 Mayor's term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1121, "no_votes": 1167, "total_votes": 2288, "percent_yes": 48.99475524475524, "percent_no": 51.00524475524476, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.138088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.825294", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of the Office of the Mayor of Desert Hot Springs increase from two years to four years, beginning with the 2003 Mayor's term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9289, "fingerprint": "2002|200200081|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200081|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b23e7fcb3ec04898", "measure_id": "200200081", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the City of Riverside increase public library service hours and after school programs for children, and provide matching funds to establish the City of Riverside's eligibility for State of California Library Construction and Renovation Bond funds by authorizing the City of Riverside to establish a special tax within the City of Riverside in the amount of nineteen dollars ($19) per parcel for the duration of ten years only, with such revenues being lawfully restricted for library purposes only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19699, "no_votes": 8836, "total_votes": 28535, "percent_yes": 69.03451901173997, "percent_no": 30.965480988260026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.134858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.823219", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the City of Riverside increase public library service hours and after school programs for children, and provide matching funds to establish the City of Riverside's eligibility for State of California Library Construction and Renovation Bond funds by authorizing the City of Riverside to establish a special tax within the City of Riverside in the amount of nineteen dollars ($19) per parcel for the duration of ten years only, with such revenues being lawfully restricted for library purposes only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9290, "fingerprint": "2002|200200166|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200166|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "30c14258ed627299", "measure_id": "200200166", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Hemet Unified School District: Reduce overcrowding and class size by building new classrooms/schools; Make the District eligible for State matching funds; Repair, upgrade, construct and require-educational facilities and school sites, including furnishings, equipment and safety improvements; by issuing $60 million of bonds for the above purposes, at interest rates within the legal limit, with oversight by a citizen's committee in accordance with applicable law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12899, "no_votes": 7648, "total_votes": 20547, "percent_yes": 62.77802112230496, "percent_no": 37.22197887769504, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.135293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.823405", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Hemet Unified School District: Reduce overcrowding and class size by building new classrooms/schools; Make the District eligible for State matching funds; Repair, upgrade, construct and require-educational facilities and school sites, including furnishings, equipment and safety improvements; by issuing $60 million of bonds for the above purposes, at interest rates within the legal limit, with oversight by a citizen's committee in accordance with applicable law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9299, "fingerprint": "2002|200200420|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200420|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d628f3f1813d4e71", "measure_id": "200200420", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Initiative Measure entitled: \"AN INITIATIVE MEASURE TO REPEAL THE EXISTING 6% UTILITY USER'S TAX AND PROHIBITING THE CITY FROM IMPOSING A UTILITY USER'S TAX\" be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9285, "no_votes": 10710, "total_votes": 19995, "percent_yes": 46.43660915228807, "percent_no": 53.56339084771193, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.139440", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.826128", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Initiative Measure entitled: \"AN INITIATIVE MEASURE TO REPEAL THE EXISTING 6% UTILITY USER'S TAX AND PROHIBITING THE CITY FROM IMPOSING A UTILITY USER'S TAX\" be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9311, "fingerprint": "2002|200200595|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200595|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d7ae4dd93d0ffa19", "measure_id": "200200595", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall that area of the Moreno Valley Unified School District (described below) be transferred to the Riverside Unified School District (that territory being City of Riverside and County of Riverside, Portion N 1/2 NW 1/4 Section 16, T.3 S.R.4W.)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140, "no_votes": 38, "total_votes": 178, "percent_yes": 78.65168539325843, "percent_no": 21.348314606741567, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.143282", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.829447", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall that area of the Moreno Valley Unified School District (described below) be transferred to the Riverside Unified School District (that territory being City of Riverside and County of Riverside, Portion N 1/2 NW 1/4 Section 16, T.3 S.R.4W.)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9291, "fingerprint": "2002|200200226|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200226|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1b66be8f421ebc15", "measure_id": "200200226", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Riverside be authorized to establish a special tax of $36.77 per parcel, per year on all parcels within CSA 85 (Cabazon) to finance Park and Recreation services? This special tax will be in addition to the $20 assessment currently paid.  The special tax will be subject to an annual adjustment that is greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (\"CPU-I\") for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area (\"Index\") published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54, "no_votes": 182, "total_votes": 236, "percent_yes": 22.88135593220339, "percent_no": 77.11864406779661, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-08-13", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.135737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.823590", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Riverside be authorized to establish a special tax of $36.77 per parcel, per year on all parcels within CSA 85 (Cabazon) to finance Park and Recreation services? This special tax will be in addition to the $20 assessment currently paid.  The special tax will be subject to an annual adjustment that is greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (\"CPU-I\") for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area (\"Index\") published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9292, "fingerprint": "2002|200200228|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200228|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "86633562aadb8e59", "measure_id": "200200228", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Riverside be authorized to establish a Special Tax of $25.00 per parcel per year on all parcels within CSA 60 (Pinyon Flats) to finance the extended service of voluntary firefighters? This Special Tax will be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (\"CPI-U\") for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area (\"Index\") published by the Bureau of Land Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121, "no_votes": 21, "total_votes": 142, "percent_yes": 85.2112676056338, "percent_no": 14.788732394366207, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-09-10", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.136155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.824009", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Riverside be authorized to establish a Special Tax of $25.00 per parcel per year on all parcels within CSA 60 (Pinyon Flats) to finance the extended service of voluntary firefighters? This Special Tax will be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (\"CPI-U\") for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area (\"Index\") published by the Bureau of Land Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9310, "fingerprint": "2002|200200594|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200594|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "85da67d0cdfc328c", "measure_id": "200200594", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Menifee Union School District relieve overcrowding, improve education and increase safety throughout the district by constructing two new elementary schools and additional classrooms to accommodate growth, by improving technology in classrooms, by improving energy efficiency and by making other upgrades by issuing $14,500,000 of bonds at interest rates not exceeding eight percent (8%), with citizen oversight, annual audits of expenditures and performance and no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6853, "no_votes": 4715, "total_votes": 11568, "percent_yes": 59.24100968188105, "percent_no": 40.75899031811895, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.142994", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.829169", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Menifee Union School District relieve overcrowding, improve education and increase safety throughout the district by constructing two new elementary schools and additional classrooms to accommodate growth, by improving technology in classrooms, by improving energy efficiency and by making other upgrades by issuing $14,500,000 of bonds at interest rates not exceeding eight percent (8%), with citizen oversight, annual audits of expenditures and performance and no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9312, "fingerprint": "2002|200200596|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200596|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "39be586f4468276e", "measure_id": "200200596", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding, and to provide sufficient classrooms and educational facilities for local children, shall the Murrieta Valley Unified School District construct new schools, build new classrooms and facilities, acquire land and qualify for state matching funds by issuing $40.4 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, and appoint an independent citizens' oversight committee to conduct annual audits to ensure accountability and guarantee all funds will only be used to improve educational facilities for local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11119, "no_votes": 4662, "total_votes": 15781, "percent_yes": 70.45814587161777, "percent_no": 29.541854128382226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.143569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.829723", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding, and to provide sufficient classrooms and educational facilities for local children, shall the Murrieta Valley Unified School District construct new schools, build new classrooms and facilities, acquire land and qualify for state matching funds by issuing $40.4 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, and appoint an independent citizens' oversight committee to conduct annual audits to ensure accountability and guarantee all funds will only be used to improve educational facilities for local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9309, "fingerprint": "2002|200200593|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200593|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8874784fbbd3d473", "measure_id": "200200593", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Banning Unified School District, serving children from kindergarten through 12th grade, construct and furnish cafeterias/multi-purpose rooms at Hoffer and Hemerling schools and a gymnasium at Banning High School, issue $12 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit and provide a citizens' oversight committee; provide independent audits, and use no funds for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2620, "no_votes": 1245, "total_votes": 3865, "percent_yes": 67.78783958602847, "percent_no": 32.21216041397153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.142672", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.828896", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Banning Unified School District, serving children from kindergarten through 12th grade, construct and furnish cafeterias/multi-purpose rooms at Hoffer and Hemerling schools and a gymnasium at Banning High School, issue $12 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit and provide a citizens' oversight committee; provide independent audits, and use no funds for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9298, "fingerprint": "2002|200200419|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200419|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "71871972fca06854", "measure_id": "200200419", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Initiative Ordinance 2002-1, authorizing the levy of a special tax on each eligible parcel in the City to fund enhanced fire protection and paramedic services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4748, "no_votes": 2421, "total_votes": 7169, "percent_yes": 66.22959966522528, "percent_no": 33.77040033477472, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.139081", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.825852", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Initiative Ordinance 2002-1, authorizing the levy of a special tax on each eligible parcel in the City to fund enhanced fire protection and paramedic services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9297, "fingerprint": "2002|200200418|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200418|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "df4ab8c4afc00f09", "measure_id": "200200418", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be adopted making Indian Wells a Charter City so that the laws of Indian Wells shall prevail over State law with respect to municipal affairs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1641, "no_votes": 195, "total_votes": 1836, "percent_yes": 89.37908496732027, "percent_no": 10.620915032679733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.138518", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.825570", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be adopted making Indian Wells a Charter City so that the laws of Indian Wells shall prevail over State law with respect to municipal affairs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9294, "fingerprint": "2002|200200415|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200415|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e39280014ddd4b5c", "measure_id": "200200415", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a 4% utility users tax be imposed on gas, telephone, electrical and video services for a period commencing on July 1, 2003 and expiring on June 30, 2007?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2556, "no_votes": 5123, "total_votes": 7679, "percent_yes": 33.285584060424526, "percent_no": 66.71441593957547, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.137136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.824695", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a 4% utility users tax be imposed on gas, telephone, electrical and video services for a period commencing on July 1, 2003 and expiring on June 30, 2007?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9314, "fingerprint": "2002|200200598|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200598|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1e49ec6c624ad691", "measure_id": "200200598", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs and four year colleges; enhance nursing, firefighter, paramedic, public safety and hi-tech job training, repair aging buildings, classrooms, labs, upgrade earthquake safety; upgrade wiring/equipment for computer technology; construct, acquire and equip modern buildings/libraries, science/computer labs/classrooms; and improve campus security, shall San Bernardino Community College District issue $190,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 692, "no_votes": 604, "total_votes": 1296, "percent_yes": 53.39506172839506, "percent_no": 46.60493827160494, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.144190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.830291", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs and four year colleges; enhance nursing, firefighter, paramedic, public safety and hi-tech job training, repair aging buildings, classrooms, labs, upgrade earthquake safety; upgrade wiring/equipment for computer technology; construct, acquire and equip modern buildings/libraries, science/computer labs/classrooms; and improve campus security, shall San Bernardino Community College District issue $190,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9306, "fingerprint": "2002|200200427|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200427|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3b16697a78784862", "measure_id": "200200427", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 400 of the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that officials elected at the general municipal election, or at any other election, take office on the second Tuesday following completion of the canvass, but in no event later than the Tuesday following the election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28795, "no_votes": 11319, "total_votes": 40114, "percent_yes": 71.782918681757, "percent_no": 28.217081318243004, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.141695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.828068", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 400 of the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to provide that officials elected at the general municipal election, or at any other election, take office on the second Tuesday following completion of the canvass, but in no event later than the Tuesday following the election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9307, "fingerprint": "2002|200200428|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200428|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "754ebf9fe856b7d9", "measure_id": "200200428", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 1109 of the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to increase the threshold requirement for formal competitive bidding and city council approval of public works contracts from $25,000 to $50,000, subject to all other existing provisions of section 1109?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21529, "no_votes": 18756, "total_votes": 40285, "percent_yes": 53.44172769020727, "percent_no": 46.55827230979273, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.142017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.828345", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 1109 of the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to increase the threshold requirement for formal competitive bidding and city council approval of public works contracts from $25,000 to $50,000, subject to all other existing provisions of section 1109?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9308, "fingerprint": "2002|200200429|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200429|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "05ccede7bec01c77", "measure_id": "200200429", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 1202 of the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to increase from $25,000 to $50,000 the Board of Public Utilities' authorization threshold for any purchase of equipment, materials or supplies or any acquisition, construction, improvement, extension, enlargement, diminution, or curtailment of all or any part of any public utility system, subject to all other existing provisions of section 1202?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20672, "no_votes": 19953, "total_votes": 40625, "percent_yes": 50.88492307692307, "percent_no": 49.11507692307693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.142350", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.828616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 1202 of the Charter of the City of Riverside be amended to increase from $25,000 to $50,000 the Board of Public Utilities' authorization threshold for any purchase of equipment, materials or supplies or any acquisition, construction, improvement, extension, enlargement, diminution, or curtailment of all or any part of any public utility system, subject to all other existing provisions of section 1202?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9313, "fingerprint": "2002|200200597|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200597|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3a880f1d1a40e462", "measure_id": "200200597", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and build new classrooms and facilities within the Nuview Union School District, replace plumbing, air conditioning, communications and electrical systems, provide classroom technology, create handicapped access, make the District eligible for State matching funds and enhance safety with fire hydrants, security fencing, safer playgrounds, and asbestos removal, shall the District issue $6,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below the legal limit with spending reviewed by a citizen's oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1034, "no_votes": 592, "total_votes": 1626, "percent_yes": 63.59163591635917, "percent_no": 36.40836408364083, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.143872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.829989", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and build new classrooms and facilities within the Nuview Union School District, replace plumbing, air conditioning, communications and electrical systems, provide classroom technology, create handicapped access, make the District eligible for State matching funds and enhance safety with fire hydrants, security fencing, safer playgrounds, and asbestos removal, shall the District issue $6,000,000 of bonds with interest rates below the legal limit with spending reviewed by a citizen's oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9300, "fingerprint": "2002|200200421|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200421|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "63c05c8539975216", "measure_id": "200200421", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Municipal Code be amended to repeal the City's 5% utility tax on users of telephone, electricity and gas services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5148, "no_votes": 7354, "total_votes": 12502, "percent_yes": 41.17741161414173, "percent_no": 58.82258838585827, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.139800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.826408", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Municipal Code be amended to repeal the City's 5% utility tax on users of telephone, electricity and gas services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9301, "fingerprint": "2002|200200422|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200422|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cf914a2ae351862c", "measure_id": "200200422", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Municipal Code be amended concerning the tax currently collected on persons occupying hotel rooms so that the tax rate will vary from 10% to 12.5% based on the number of rooms in the hotel, with monies raised by the tax be spent solely to encourage local tourism, and not for other City services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3722, "no_votes": 8833, "total_votes": 12555, "percent_yes": 29.64555953803265, "percent_no": 70.35444046196736, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.140185", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.826689", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Municipal Code be amended concerning the tax currently collected on persons occupying hotel rooms so that the tax rate will vary from 10% to 12.5% based on the number of rooms in the hotel, with monies raised by the tax be spent solely to encourage local tourism, and not for other City services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9302, "fingerprint": "2002|200200423|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200423|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "0da13d4dffe57b9c", "measure_id": "200200423", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to establish term limits prohibiting any person elected to the office of the Mayor or City Council or appointed to any City board or commission from serving more than two terms or a total of ten years in that office or on that board or commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5919, "no_votes": 6662, "total_votes": 12581, "percent_yes": 47.04713456799936, "percent_no": 52.95286543200064, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.140477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.826967", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to establish term limits prohibiting any person elected to the office of the Mayor or City Council or appointed to any City board or commission from serving more than two terms or a total of ten years in that office or on that board or commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9303, "fingerprint": "2002|200200424|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200424|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "478d6ddd27b0220b", "measure_id": "200200424", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter Municipal Code be amended to prohibit the City (other than at the airport) from (a) metering, charging for or taxing any public parking space, (b) reserving public parking spaces for any user (except handicap parking), and (c) placing any time restrictions for public parking spaces less than 24 hours?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4984, "no_votes": 7505, "total_votes": 12489, "percent_yes": 39.90711826407238, "percent_no": 60.09288173592762, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.140770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.827249", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter Municipal Code be amended to prohibit the City (other than at the airport) from (a) metering, charging for or taxing any public parking space, (b) reserving public parking spaces for any user (except handicap parking), and (c) placing any time restrictions for public parking spaces less than 24 hours?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9304, "fingerprint": "2002|200200425|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200425|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "bbde75d6d435a551", "measure_id": "200200425", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that persons serving on city boards and commissions be nominated and appointed by the City Council rather than nominated by the Mayor and appointed by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6678, "no_votes": 5719, "total_votes": 12397, "percent_yes": 53.8678712591756, "percent_no": 46.1321287408244, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.141062", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.827521", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that persons serving on city boards and commissions be nominated and appointed by the City Council rather than nominated by the Mayor and appointed by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9305, "fingerprint": "2002|200200426|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200426|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "28f1f6189740a69c", "measure_id": "200200426", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended so that after a City Council election is called by the Council or within 90 days after the City Council election, if a vacancy occurs on the City Council, the City Council must appoint the next highest vote getter to the open seat?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7243, "no_votes": 5196, "total_votes": 12439, "percent_yes": 58.22815338853605, "percent_no": 41.77184661146395, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.141357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.827794", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended so that after a City Council election is called by the Council or within 90 days after the City Council election, if a vacancy occurs on the City Council, the City Council must appoint the next highest vote getter to the open seat?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9319, "fingerprint": "2002|200200170|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200170|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "c766e27783e25e1a", "measure_id": "200200170", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $265 million dollars in bonds a the lowest available interest rate, for building and repairing classrooms and facilities; upgrading academic and vocational education programs including computer sciences, electronics, nursing and high-tech training facilities; upgrading libraries; building new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and making building safety improvements at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College Campuses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117727, "no_votes": 76588, "total_votes": 194315, "percent_yes": 60.58564701644238, "percent_no": 39.41435298355762, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.145765", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.831685", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $265 million dollars in bonds a the lowest available interest rate, for building and repairing classrooms and facilities; upgrading academic and vocational education programs including computer sciences, electronics, nursing and high-tech training facilities; upgrading libraries; building new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and making building safety improvements at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College Campuses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9316, "fingerprint": "2002|200200167|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200167|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "7550ca901691799f", "measure_id": "200200167", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For Rancho Cordova only, to renovate classrooms and school buildings, acquire land, construct new school facilities, install technology improvements, and qualify for available state matching funds, shall School Facilities Improvement District No.1 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue $49 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for administrator or teacher salaries or other school operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5685, "no_votes": 2108, "total_votes": 7793, "percent_yes": 72.95008340818684, "percent_no": 27.049916591813158, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.144846", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.830853", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For Rancho Cordova only, to renovate classrooms and school buildings, acquire land, construct new school facilities, install technology improvements, and qualify for available state matching funds, shall School Facilities Improvement District No.1 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue $49 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for administrator or teacher salaries or other school operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9317, "fingerprint": "2002|200200168|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200168|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "e1ff3fdf9b7cf451", "measure_id": "200200168", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For Folsom only, to renovate classrooms and school buildings, acquire land, construct new school facilities, install technology improvements, and qualify for any available state matching funds, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue $53 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for administrator or teacher salaries or other school operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8657, "no_votes": 3966, "total_votes": 12623, "percent_yes": 68.58116137209855, "percent_no": 31.41883862790145, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.145134", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.831131", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For Folsom only, to renovate classrooms and school buildings, acquire land, construct new school facilities, install technology improvements, and qualify for any available state matching funds, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue $53 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for administrator or teacher salaries or other school operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9320, "fingerprint": "2002|200200171|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200171|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "feb74379700b996d", "measure_id": "200200171", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding and enhance student safety; to acquire, construct and equip a new high school, additional classrooms and facilities; to upgrade technology; and to renovate and modernize existing schools, shall Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $79,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee, and have annual audits performed to ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2114, "no_votes": 550, "total_votes": 2664, "percent_yes": 79.35435435435436, "percent_no": 20.645645645645644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.146053", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.831957", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding and enhance student safety; to acquire, construct and equip a new high school, additional classrooms and facilities; to upgrade technology; and to renovate and modernize existing schools, shall Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $79,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee, and have annual audits performed to ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9318, "fingerprint": "2002|200200169|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200169|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "90263ac3ae1d4ab9", "measure_id": "200200169", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and rehabilitate school buildings for student health and safety, qualify for State matching funds, upgrade inadequate plumbing, electrical, heating and ventilation systems, renovate restrooms, repair deteriorating roofs, repair dry rot, upgrade fire safety systems,  provide needed classrooms and make other improvements to school sites and buildings, shall Grant Joint Union High School District issue $74 million of bonds at any legally authorized interest rates, with annual audits and citizens oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10395, "no_votes": 7808, "total_votes": 18203, "percent_yes": 57.10597154315222, "percent_no": 42.89402845684778, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.145419", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.831408", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and rehabilitate school buildings for student health and safety, qualify for State matching funds, upgrade inadequate plumbing, electrical, heating and ventilation systems, renovate restrooms, repair deteriorating roofs, repair dry rot, upgrade fire safety systems,  provide needed classrooms and make other improvements to school sites and buildings, shall Grant Joint Union High School District issue $74 million of bonds at any legally authorized interest rates, with annual audits and citizens oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9315, "fingerprint": "2002|200200082|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200082|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "58de280295edb119", "measure_id": "200200082", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the provisions of the Charter of the City of Sacramento that govern the Sacramento City Employees Retirement System be amended to change the definition of \"final compensation\" from a three year average to a single highest paid year formula; to allow employer payment of required employee contributions; to allow the City Council to change the age and years of service formula by ordinance; to allow the City Council to appropriate \"Excess Funding\" in the system to other specified municipal public purposes; and to allow the City Council to enact ordinances to clarify or implement these amendments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28165, "no_votes": 28694, "total_votes": 56859, "percent_yes": 49.53481418948627, "percent_no": 50.46518581051373, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.144509", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.830573", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the provisions of the Charter of the City of Sacramento that govern the Sacramento City Employees Retirement System be amended to change the definition of \"final compensation\" from a three year average to a single highest paid year formula; to allow employer payment of required employee contributions; to allow the City Council to change the age and years of service formula by ordinance; to allow the City Council to appropriate \"Excess Funding\" in the system to other specified municipal public purposes; and to allow the City Council to enact ordinances to clarify or implement these amendments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9321, "fingerprint": "2002|200200264|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200264|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "75d33dc43fc9336d", "measure_id": "200200264", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Sacramento continue to collect the existing utility user tax within its unincorporated area in the amount of 2.5% upon the use of electricity, natural gas, landline telephone, cable television and sewer service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 150943, "no_votes": 135565, "total_votes": 286508, "percent_yes": 52.68369469613414, "percent_no": 47.31630530386586, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.146339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.832238", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Sacramento continue to collect the existing utility user tax within its unincorporated area in the amount of 2.5% upon the use of electricity, natural gas, landline telephone, cable television and sewer service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9322, "fingerprint": "2002|200200265|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200265|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "8abf59ebd052b6f7", "measure_id": "200200265", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Sacramento continue to collect the existing 2% increase from 10% to 12% in the transient occupancy tax that is collected only from guests renting rooms in hotels, motels, and other temporary lodging accommodations within the unincorporated area of Sacramento County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 176992, "no_votes": 109274, "total_votes": 286266, "percent_yes": 61.8278104979285, "percent_no": 38.1721895020715, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.146623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.832517", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Sacramento continue to collect the existing 2% increase from 10% to 12% in the transient occupancy tax that is collected only from guests renting rooms in hotels, motels, and other temporary lodging accommodations within the unincorporated area of Sacramento County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9334, "fingerprint": "2002|200200603|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200603|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "3698d54e342ac665", "measure_id": "200200603", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To alleviate overcrowding, renovate, repair, replace, acquire, and construct school buildings, meet fire/health/safety standards, provide wiring for computers, and provide needed mechanical improvements, shall the Sacramento City Unified School District issue $225,000,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible and appoint a citizens' oversight committee and an independent auditor to assure that funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49115, "no_votes": 23926, "total_votes": 73041, "percent_yes": 67.24305527032762, "percent_no": 32.756944729672384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.150284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.835860", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To alleviate overcrowding, renovate, repair, replace, acquire, and construct school buildings, meet fire/health/safety standards, provide wiring for computers, and provide needed mechanical improvements, shall the Sacramento City Unified School District issue $225,000,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible and appoint a citizens' oversight committee and an independent auditor to assure that funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9335, "fingerprint": "2002|200200604|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200604|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "aeab6bfe4e7f9125", "measure_id": "200200604", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete the repair/renovation in Carmichael, Orangevale, Citrus Heights, Arden-Arcade, Gold River, and Fair Oaks by building permanent classrooms to replace leaky, moldy, portable classrooms and by replacing failing plumbing, sewer and heating/air conditioning systems, shall the San Juan Unified School District issue $350,000,000 in bonds qualifying local schools for state matching funds, and appoint a citizens oversight committee and independent auditor to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63010, "no_votes": 32821, "total_votes": 95831, "percent_yes": 65.7511661153489, "percent_no": 34.248833884651106, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.150571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.836136", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete the repair/renovation in Carmichael, Orangevale, Citrus Heights, Arden-Arcade, Gold River, and Fair Oaks by building permanent classrooms to replace leaky, moldy, portable classrooms and by replacing failing plumbing, sewer and heating/air conditioning systems, shall the San Juan Unified School District issue $350,000,000 in bonds qualifying local schools for state matching funds, and appoint a citizens oversight committee and independent auditor to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9333, "fingerprint": "2002|200200602|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200602|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "6d46d520606c9028", "measure_id": "200200602", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve school overcrowding and enhance student safety; to design, acquire property, construct and equip a new high school; to provide new classrooms and related facilities on existing campuses, and to remain current with new technology, shall Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $65.3 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3626, "no_votes": 711, "total_votes": 4337, "percent_yes": 83.60617938667282, "percent_no": 16.39382061332718, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.149954", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.835560", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve school overcrowding and enhance student safety; to design, acquire property, construct and equip a new high school; to provide new classrooms and related facilities on existing campuses, and to remain current with new technology, shall Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $65.3 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9330, "fingerprint": "2002|200200599|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200599|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "c68c300c866fc69c", "measure_id": "200200599", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to modern technology, construct and expand student support facilities, upgrade plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, construct classrooms, and qualify the District for $1,000,000 in State-matching funds, shall the Elverta Joint Elementary School District issue $10,500,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring a citizens' oversight committee and annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 448, "no_votes": 273, "total_votes": 721, "percent_yes": 62.13592233009708, "percent_no": 37.86407766990292, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.149042", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.834745", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, upgrade electrical systems to improve student access to modern technology, construct and expand student support facilities, upgrade plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, construct classrooms, and qualify the District for $1,000,000 in State-matching funds, shall the Elverta Joint Elementary School District issue $10,500,000 in bonds, within maximum legal interest rates, requiring a citizens' oversight committee and annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9331, "fingerprint": "2002|200200600|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200600|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "9d1a9b47ff8d33ea", "measure_id": "200200600", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to enable the Natomas Unified School District to continue providing exceptional educational opportunities, shall the District issue $45.88 million in bonds, at legal interest rates within legal limits, to acquire, construct, modernize, repair, replace and equip its school facilities to meet safety and instructional needs, accommodate future growth, and create additional space for student class size reduction, additional educational programs and other needs, subject to oversight by an independent citizens' committee as legally required?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5669, "no_votes": 2163, "total_votes": 7832, "percent_yes": 72.38253319713994, "percent_no": 27.617466802860065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.149327", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.835013", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to enable the Natomas Unified School District to continue providing exceptional educational opportunities, shall the District issue $45.88 million in bonds, at legal interest rates within legal limits, to acquire, construct, modernize, repair, replace and equip its school facilities to meet safety and instructional needs, accommodate future growth, and create additional space for student class size reduction, additional educational programs and other needs, subject to oversight by an independent citizens' committee as legally required?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9332, "fingerprint": "2002|200200601|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200601|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "20304fdb1cbb1989", "measure_id": "200200601", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Rio Linda Union School District add new classrooms at existing schools, build new libraries/media centers, improve student safety conditions, install energy efficient heating/cooling systems, upgrade electrical wiring, repair, acquire, construct, and equip libraries/media centers, sites, classrooms, qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $15,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9946, "no_votes": 5249, "total_votes": 15195, "percent_yes": 65.45574202040146, "percent_no": 34.54425797959854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.149613", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.835290", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Rio Linda Union School District add new classrooms at existing schools, build new libraries/media centers, improve student safety conditions, install energy efficient heating/cooling systems, upgrade electrical wiring, repair, acquire, construct, and equip libraries/media centers, sites, classrooms, qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $15,400,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9323, "fingerprint": "2002|200200430|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200430|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "bc77c3d11b7ac918", "measure_id": "200200430", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Elk Grove's base year appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2000-01 be established at $22,040,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13511, "no_votes": 5050, "total_votes": 18561, "percent_yes": 72.79241420182102, "percent_no": 27.207585798178982, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.146963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.832792", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Elk Grove's base year appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2000-01 be established at $22,040,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9324, "fingerprint": "2002|200200431|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200431|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "15358ebc86791a3b", "measure_id": "200200431", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a City of Folsom Charter Amendment be approved that prohibits water meter retrofits on pre-1992 single-family residences if the cost is paid by the citizens; establishes different water rates for residences with meters and residences without meters; and allows all single-family residences, except those served by the San Juan Water District, to be charged a prorated share for Folsom's capital improvements and Water Forum obligation.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8545, "no_votes": 7402, "total_votes": 15947, "percent_yes": 53.58374615915219, "percent_no": 46.41625384084781, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.147248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.833064", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a City of Folsom Charter Amendment be approved that prohibits water meter retrofits on pre-1992 single-family residences if the cost is paid by the citizens; establishes different water rates for residences with meters and residences without meters; and allows all single-family residences, except those served by the San Juan Water District, to be charged a prorated share for Folsom's capital improvements and Water Forum obligation.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9325, "fingerprint": "2002|200200432|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200432|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "e691b0aa6d369ea0", "measure_id": "200200432", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should an ordinance be added to the Galt Municipal Code placing contribution limitations on municipal elections within the City of Galt?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2666, "no_votes": 1730, "total_votes": 4396, "percent_yes": 60.64604185623293, "percent_no": 39.35395814376707, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.147534", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.833339", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should an ordinance be added to the Galt Municipal Code placing contribution limitations on municipal elections within the City of Galt?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9326, "fingerprint": "2002|200200433|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200433|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "70f88792cfda2cd3", "measure_id": "200200433", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should an ordinance be added to the Galt Municipal Code placing a limit on the number of residential building permits the City may issue for new dwellings annually within the City of Galt?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2045, "no_votes": 2536, "total_votes": 4581, "percent_yes": 44.640908098668405, "percent_no": 55.359091901331595, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.147823", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.833620", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should an ordinance be added to the Galt Municipal Code placing a limit on the number of residential building permits the City may issue for new dwellings annually within the City of Galt?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9328, "fingerprint": "2002|200200435|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200435|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "ac3b79364e35100c", "measure_id": "200200435", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the provisions of the Charter of the City of Sacramento be amended to provide that the Mayor shall serve full-time and devote his or her full time and attention to the duties of the office of Mayor and in return receive compensation as established by the Compensation Commission; to establish the Compensation Commission that shall be responsible for determining the compensation of the Mayor, members of the City Council and public members of City Boards and Commissions; and to require the compensation for the Mayor and City Council be reasonable and consistent with the compensation paid in other cities of similar size and structure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 51438, "no_votes": 32032, "total_votes": 83470, "percent_yes": 61.62453576135138, "percent_no": 38.37546423864862, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.148463", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.834175", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the provisions of the Charter of the City of Sacramento be amended to provide that the Mayor shall serve full-time and devote his or her full time and attention to the duties of the office of Mayor and in return receive compensation as established by the Compensation Commission; to establish the Compensation Commission that shall be responsible for determining the compensation of the Mayor, members of the City Council and public members of City Boards and Commissions; and to require the compensation for the Mayor and City Council be reasonable and consistent with the compensation paid in other cities of similar size and structure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9329, "fingerprint": "2002|200200436|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200436|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "2df5968f7a593c3d", "measure_id": "200200436", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 3.32, of Title 3 of the Sacramento City Code be amended to reduce the City of Sacramento utility user tax from seven and one-half percent (7.5%) to two and one-half percent (2.5%) over a four year period; and to eliminate the age and disability requirements of the existing utility user tax refund procedure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38878, "no_votes": 45308, "total_votes": 84186, "percent_yes": 46.18107523816311, "percent_no": 53.81892476183689, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.148752", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.834466", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 3.32, of Title 3 of the Sacramento City Code be amended to reduce the City of Sacramento utility user tax from seven and one-half percent (7.5%) to two and one-half percent (2.5%) over a four year period; and to eliminate the age and disability requirements of the existing utility user tax refund procedure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9327, "fingerprint": "2002|200200434|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200434|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "1121be9f1cfabe37", "measure_id": "200200434", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adpoted on July 16, 2002, by the Board of Supervisors ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as Incorporation of Rancho Cordova, California (12-97) be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions including the annual payment from the City to the County of Sacramento, including sharing of its revenue with the County of Sacramento and the Property Tax Revenue Agreement between the City and the County of Sacramento commencing in fiscal year 2003-2004 and terminating, as adjusted, no later than after the end of fiscal year 2033-2034; including authorization, as approved by the voters through this measure, for the City to continue to levy and collect within its territory the same general taxes, fees, charges, assessments and rates levied and collected by the County of Sacramento as of November 1, 2002; and, further including approval by the voters through this measure of the Tax Sharing Agreeement Between the County of Sacramento and the City of Ranch Cordova, as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9097, "no_votes": 2630, "total_votes": 11727, "percent_yes": 77.57312185554703, "percent_no": 22.42687814445297, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.148119", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.833893", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adpoted on July 16, 2002, by the Board of Supervisors ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as Incorporation of Rancho Cordova, California (12-97) be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions including the annual payment from the City to the County of Sacramento, including sharing of its revenue with the County of Sacramento and the Property Tax Revenue Agreement between the City and the County of Sacramento commencing in fiscal year 2003-2004 and terminating, as adjusted, no later than after the end of fiscal year 2033-2034; including authorization, as approved by the voters through this measure, for the City to continue to levy and collect within its territory the same general taxes, fees, charges, assessments and rates levied and collected by the County of Sacramento as of November 1, 2002; and, further including approval by the voters through this measure of the Tax Sharing Agreeement Between the County of Sacramento and the City of Ranch Cordova, as more particularly described and set forth in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9341, "fingerprint": "2002|200200605|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200605|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "19636e2d8f0d17e4", "measure_id": "200200605", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Hartnell Community College District issue $131,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual performance and financial audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28, "no_votes": 31, "total_votes": 59, "percent_yes": 47.45762711864407, "percent_no": 52.54237288135593, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.152477", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.837808", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Hartnell Community College District issue $131,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual performance and financial audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9336, "fingerprint": "2002|200200083|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200083|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "83fd02b453bcae3d", "measure_id": "200200083", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 960 adjusting the boundaries of the five City Council districts in accordance with the results of the 2000 federal census be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3239, "no_votes": 1006, "total_votes": 4245, "percent_yes": 76.30153121319199, "percent_no": 23.698468786808007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.150857", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.836420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 960 adjusting the boundaries of the five City Council districts in accordance with the results of the 2000 federal census be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9337, "fingerprint": "2002|200200084|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200084|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "52394a286874fcc4", "measure_id": "200200084", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 961 eliminating the requirement of decennial voter approval of district boundary changes be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2051, "no_votes": 2088, "total_votes": 4139, "percent_yes": 49.55303213336555, "percent_no": 50.44696786663445, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.151203", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.836703", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 961 eliminating the requirement of decennial voter approval of district boundary changes be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9338, "fingerprint": "2002|200200085|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200085|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "b6d8fc3dc6fbd823", "measure_id": "200200085", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2001-05, approved by the San Juan Bautista City Council, which adds a new chapter to the San Juan Bautista Municipal Code entitled \"Developmental Agreement Regulations\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143, "no_votes": 236, "total_votes": 379, "percent_yes": 37.73087071240105, "percent_no": 62.26912928759895, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.151585", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.836978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2001-05, approved by the San Juan Bautista City Council, which adds a new chapter to the San Juan Bautista Municipal Code entitled \"Developmental Agreement Regulations\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9339, "fingerprint": "2002|200200172|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200172|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "e25bc1e5c725051f", "measure_id": "200200172", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify for State matching funds, expand vocational education classrooms, upgrade electrical wiring, plumbing, replace relocatable classrooms and to construct, acquire, modernize and equip classrooms, facilities and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $11,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committe and maintain strict financial accountability guidelines to guarantee that no bond money is used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 766, "no_votes": 501, "total_votes": 1267, "percent_yes": 60.45777426992897, "percent_no": 39.54222573007103, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.151907", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.837252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify for State matching funds, expand vocational education classrooms, upgrade electrical wiring, plumbing, replace relocatable classrooms and to construct, acquire, modernize and equip classrooms, facilities and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $11,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committe and maintain strict financial accountability guidelines to guarantee that no bond money is used for salaries or other operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9340, "fingerprint": "2002|200200437|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200437|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "cbc5bf09e8290623", "measure_id": "200200437", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance establishing a residential growth limit of 224 residential unit allocations per calendar year, with a minimum of forty allocations set aside for low and very low income housing, and requiring the adoption of rate scales to evaluate and rank proposed projects, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4414, "no_votes": 1915, "total_votes": 6329, "percent_yes": 69.74245536419656, "percent_no": 30.25754463580344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.152192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.837527", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance establishing a residential growth limit of 224 residential unit allocations per calendar year, with a minimum of forty allocations set aside for low and very low income housing, and requiring the adoption of rate scales to evaluate and rank proposed projects, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9351, "fingerprint": "2002|200200443|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200443|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "04983f574758e52b", "measure_id": "200200443", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the zoning of an approximately 435 acre parcel of land, generally located east of Central Avenue and on the south side of Edison Avenue, from an institutional zone to residential zone?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5058, "no_votes": 3889, "total_votes": 8947, "percent_yes": 56.53291606124958, "percent_no": 43.46708393875042, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.155482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.840536", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the zoning of an approximately 435 acre parcel of land, generally located east of Central Avenue and on the south side of Edison Avenue, from an institutional zone to residential zone?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9353, "fingerprint": "2002|200200445|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200445|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "19a22d6f323dd8c6", "measure_id": "200200445", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Approve a Charter Amendment to set the annual salary of the Mayor on January 1, 2003 at 50% of the  salary for a Superior Court Judge, County of San Bernardino, State of California, which was in effect on July 1, 2002, thereafter adjusted and implemented January 1 of each subsequent year to 50% the salary for said Superior Court Judge then in effect on that January 1 date.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10355, "no_votes": 9458, "total_votes": 19813, "percent_yes": 52.263665270277095, "percent_no": 47.736334729722905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.156092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.840901", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approve a Charter Amendment to set the annual salary of the Mayor on January 1, 2003 at 50% of the  salary for a Superior Court Judge, County of San Bernardino, State of California, which was in effect on July 1, 2002, thereafter adjusted and implemented January 1 of each subsequent year to 50% the salary for said Superior Court Judge then in effect on that January 1 date.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9354, "fingerprint": "2002|200200446|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200446|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "20161ad3197c8a8c", "measure_id": "200200446", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Approve a Charter Amendment to set the annual salary of Council members on January 1, 2003 at 12 1/2% of the salary for a Superior Court Judge, County of San Bernardino, State of California, which was in effect on July 1, 2002, thereafter adjusted and implemented January 1 of each year to 12 1/2% of the salary for said Superior Court Judge then in effect on that January 1 date. The annual salary would be received in twelve (12) equal monthly payments.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9333, "no_votes": 10235, "total_votes": 19568, "percent_yes": 47.69521668029435, "percent_no": 52.30478331970565, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.156357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.841088", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approve a Charter Amendment to set the annual salary of Council members on January 1, 2003 at 12 1/2% of the salary for a Superior Court Judge, County of San Bernardino, State of California, which was in effect on July 1, 2002, thereafter adjusted and implemented January 1 of each year to 12 1/2% of the salary for said Superior Court Judge then in effect on that January 1 date. The annual salary would be received in twelve (12) equal monthly payments.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9355, "fingerprint": "2002|200200447|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200447|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ca6b4cd49dd25c6e", "measure_id": "200200447", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance repealing Chapter 3.54 and adding Chapter 3.55 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code be approved so as to permit the City of San Bernardino to continue to collect and use the transient lodging tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12078, "no_votes": 6954, "total_votes": 19032, "percent_yes": 63.46153846153846, "percent_no": 36.53846153846154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.156621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.841268", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance repealing Chapter 3.54 and adding Chapter 3.55 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code be approved so as to permit the City of San Bernardino to continue to collect and use the transient lodging tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9356, "fingerprint": "2002|200200448|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200448|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "849b0191ac03ac3f", "measure_id": "200200448", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which increases the existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 7% to 9%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1307, "no_votes": 2486, "total_votes": 3793, "percent_yes": 34.45821249670445, "percent_no": 65.54178750329555, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.157152", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.841450", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which increases the existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 7% to 9%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9358, "fingerprint": "2002|200200607|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200607|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "9b8ccb3a684621fa", "measure_id": "200200607", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for four-year colleges and jobs in nursing, public safety, and business at Bakersfield, Cerro Coso, and Porterville Colleges by removing hazardous materials, leaky roofs, decaying walls; improving fire safety, lighting, and security systems; upgrading computer technology; renovating, constructing, equipping/acquiring buildings, classrooms; shall Kern Community College Safety, Repair and Improvement District issue $180 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual fiscal audits, a Citizens Oversight Committee, NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 208, "no_votes": 227, "total_votes": 435, "percent_yes": 47.81609195402299, "percent_no": 52.18390804597701, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.157686", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.841820", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for four-year colleges and jobs in nursing, public safety, and business at Bakersfield, Cerro Coso, and Porterville Colleges by removing hazardous materials, leaky roofs, decaying walls; improving fire safety, lighting, and security systems; upgrading computer technology; renovating, constructing, equipping/acquiring buildings, classrooms; shall Kern Community College Safety, Repair and Improvement District issue $180 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual fiscal audits, a Citizens Oversight Committee, NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9345, "fingerprint": "2002|200200266|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200266|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "78f93e658ba32ad9", "measure_id": "200200266", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a Special Tax in the annual amount of $113.82 per developed parcel up to one-half acre and $2.52 per acre of undeveloped parcel within Morongo Valley Community Services District be authorized to fund fire protection and paramedic services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 465, "no_votes": 469, "total_votes": 934, "percent_yes": 49.78586723768736, "percent_no": 50.21413276231264, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.153734", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.838909", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Special Tax in the annual amount of $113.82 per developed parcel up to one-half acre and $2.52 per acre of undeveloped parcel within Morongo Valley Community Services District be authorized to fund fire protection and paramedic services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9343, "fingerprint": "2002|200200173|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200173|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d607ef104154ff49", "measure_id": "200200173", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair/replace old/deteriorating buildings, reduce overcrowding, improve nursing/health care programs, teacher training, law enforcement, job training and four-year college transfer programs; improve campus lighting/security; remove asbestos/safety hazards; construct, acquire, repair/upgrade classrooms, libraries, plumbing, electrical systems, science/computer labs, sites and educational facilities; qualify for State matching funds, shall Chaffey Community College District issue $230,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with Citizens Oversight Committee, performing annual audits with no money for administrators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33737, "no_votes": 24458, "total_votes": 58195, "percent_yes": 57.97233439298909, "percent_no": 42.02766560701091, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.153090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.838356", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair/replace old/deteriorating buildings, reduce overcrowding, improve nursing/health care programs, teacher training, law enforcement, job training and four-year college transfer programs; improve campus lighting/security; remove asbestos/safety hazards; construct, acquire, repair/upgrade classrooms, libraries, plumbing, electrical systems, science/computer labs, sites and educational facilities; qualify for State matching funds, shall Chaffey Community College District issue $230,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with Citizens Oversight Committee, performing annual audits with no money for administrators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9344, "fingerprint": "2002|200200174|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200174|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f4dc7161db7b17cf", "measure_id": "200200174", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding, improve safety for children, repair/renovate local schools, shall Chino School District acquire, construct, and improve school sites and facilities, obtain eligibility for state funding, add classrooms, build schools, repair roofs, eliminate asbestos/other safety hazards, upgrade electrical, plumbing, heating/cooling systems, improve security and provide for technology, issue $150 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent Citizens Oversight and annual audit expenditures, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10191, "no_votes": 6287, "total_votes": 16478, "percent_yes": 61.84609782740624, "percent_no": 38.15390217259376, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.153414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.838632", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding, improve safety for children, repair/renovate local schools, shall Chino School District acquire, construct, and improve school sites and facilities, obtain eligibility for state funding, add classrooms, build schools, repair roofs, eliminate asbestos/other safety hazards, upgrade electrical, plumbing, heating/cooling systems, improve security and provide for technology, issue $150 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, with independent Citizens Oversight and annual audit expenditures, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9342, "fingerprint": "2002|200200086|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200086|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d7642f954005ac6f", "measure_id": "200200086", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 391 prepared and proposed by the City Council of the City of Adelanto be Adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 436, "no_votes": 511, "total_votes": 947, "percent_yes": 46.04012671594509, "percent_no": 53.95987328405491, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.152766", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.838085", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 391 prepared and proposed by the City Council of the City of Adelanto be Adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9361, "fingerprint": "2002|200200610|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200610|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1e49ec6c624ad691", "measure_id": "200200610", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for jobs and four year colleges; enhance nursing, firefighter, paramedic, public safety and hi-tech job training, repair aging buildings, classrooms, labs, upgrade earthquake safety; upgrade wiring/equipment for computer technology; construct, acquire and equip modern buildings/libraries, science/computer labs/classrooms; and improve campus security, shall San Bernardino Community College District issue $190,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59795, "no_votes": 35253, "total_votes": 95048, "percent_yes": 62.91031899671745, "percent_no": 37.08968100328255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.158539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.842361", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for jobs and four year colleges; enhance nursing, firefighter, paramedic, public safety and hi-tech job training, repair aging buildings, classrooms, labs, upgrade earthquake safety; upgrade wiring/equipment for computer technology; construct, acquire and equip modern buildings/libraries, science/computer labs/classrooms; and improve campus security, shall San Bernardino Community College District issue $190,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9357, "fingerprint": "2002|200200606|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200606|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "40bcb15e23149cd1", "measure_id": "200200606", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Bear Valley Unified School District repair local schools, sites, replace deterioration portable classrooms, improve student safety conditions, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate technology, install energy efficient heating/ventilation systems, repair, acquire, construct, and equip school libraries, classrooms, cafeterias, plumbing/restrooms, qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $25,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure that no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3423, "no_votes": 1928, "total_votes": 5351, "percent_yes": 63.9693515230798, "percent_no": 36.0306484769202, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.157418", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.841634", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Bear Valley Unified School District repair local schools, sites, replace deterioration portable classrooms, improve student safety conditions, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate technology, install energy efficient heating/ventilation systems, repair, acquire, construct, and equip school libraries, classrooms, cafeterias, plumbing/restrooms, qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $25,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure that no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9360, "fingerprint": "2002|200200609|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200609|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4b873078bd322f4d", "measure_id": "200200609", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize schools, relieve overcrowding, accommodate class-size reduction, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Redlands Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance the repair, renovation, construction, acquisition and improvement of school facilities and land, excluding certain projects if the voters approve the Kindergarten-University Public Education Families Bond Act of 2002, with annual audits, no proceeds for administrators' salaries, and a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17850, "no_votes": 7598, "total_votes": 25448, "percent_yes": 70.14303678088652, "percent_no": 29.85696321911348, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.158219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.842180", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize schools, relieve overcrowding, accommodate class-size reduction, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Redlands Unified School District issue $60,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance the repair, renovation, construction, acquisition and improvement of school facilities and land, excluding certain projects if the voters approve the Kindergarten-University Public Education Families Bond Act of 2002, with annual audits, no proceeds for administrators' salaries, and a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9362, "fingerprint": "2002|200200611|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200611|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "e24d144408d72529", "measure_id": "200200611", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the athletic and recreational facilities for the students and the Upland community, shall the Upland Unified School District construct a new gymnasium, a competitive swim complex upgrade and improvements to the Upland High School stadium and track, by issuing $20 million of bonds, at interest rates below the legal limits, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7821, "no_votes": 7957, "total_votes": 15778, "percent_yes": 49.56902015464571, "percent_no": 50.43097984535429, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.158806", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.842549", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the athletic and recreational facilities for the students and the Upland community, shall the Upland Unified School District construct a new gymnasium, a competitive swim complex upgrade and improvements to the Upland High School stadium and track, by issuing $20 million of bonds, at interest rates below the legal limits, with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9359, "fingerprint": "2002|200200608|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200608|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6de2f4b3fffa645b", "measure_id": "200200608", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Ontario-Montclair School District repair local K-8 schools/sites; improve student safety conditions; upgrade electrical wiring for technology/fire alarms/emergency communication systems; install energy efficient heating/cooling systems; replace aging plumbing; fix roofs/bathrooms; repair, acquire, construct, equip libraries, classrooms; reduce classroom overcrowding; qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $59,655,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for teachers'/administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11472, "no_votes": 5570, "total_votes": 17042, "percent_yes": 67.31604271799084, "percent_no": 32.68395728200916, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.157952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.842001", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ontario-Montclair School District repair local K-8 schools/sites; improve student safety conditions; upgrade electrical wiring for technology/fire alarms/emergency communication systems; install energy efficient heating/cooling systems; replace aging plumbing; fix roofs/bathrooms; repair, acquire, construct, equip libraries, classrooms; reduce classroom overcrowding; qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $59,655,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for teachers'/administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9346, "fingerprint": "2002|200200438|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200438|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a57cadbb38606f43", "measure_id": "200200438", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Adelanto approve a Charter Amendment to create the office of a directly elected Mayor for a 2 year term?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1394, "no_votes": 362, "total_votes": 1756, "percent_yes": 79.38496583143508, "percent_no": 20.615034168564918, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.154019", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.839180", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Adelanto approve a Charter Amendment to create the office of a directly elected Mayor for a 2 year term?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9347, "fingerprint": "2002|200200439|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200439|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "44f4e954632712c1", "measure_id": "200200439", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 398, prepared and proposed by the City of Adelanto, levying an Assessment for the purpose of obtaining, providing, operating and maintaining parks and recreation services, park and recreation equipment and paying salaries and benefits to the park personnel be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 953, "no_votes": 845, "total_votes": 1798, "percent_yes": 53.00333704115684, "percent_no": 46.99666295884316, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.154301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.839467", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 398, prepared and proposed by the City of Adelanto, levying an Assessment for the purpose of obtaining, providing, operating and maintaining parks and recreation services, park and recreation equipment and paying salaries and benefits to the park personnel be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9348, "fingerprint": "2002|200200440|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200440|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200200440", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1108, "no_votes": 2374, "total_votes": 3482, "percent_yes": 31.820792647903502, "percent_no": 68.1792073520965, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.154584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.839862", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9349, "fingerprint": "2002|200200441|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200441|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "200200441", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1028, "no_votes": 2427, "total_votes": 3455, "percent_yes": 29.75397973950796, "percent_no": 70.24602026049203, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.154950", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.840170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9350, "fingerprint": "2002|200200442|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200442|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f5b41d56ad59c460", "measure_id": "200200442", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase from 10% to 12.5% the City's existing transient occupancy tax, paid only by tourists and other occupants of hotels and motels, and used by the City to pay for services such as police protection, street improvements, and programs to promote growth and development in Barstow?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2197, "no_votes": 1324, "total_votes": 3521, "percent_yes": 62.39704629366657, "percent_no": 37.60295370633343, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.155218", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.840357", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to increase from 10% to 12.5% the City's existing transient occupancy tax, paid only by tourists and other occupants of hotels and motels, and used by the City to pay for services such as police protection, street improvements, and programs to promote growth and development in Barstow?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9352, "fingerprint": "2002|200200444|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200444|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c8b366617dcc9b93", "measure_id": "200200444", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the zoning of a 1/2 acre vacant parcel of land-located at the southeast corner of Riverside Drive and Magnolia Avenue-from an administrative/professional office zone to a multi-family residential zone (RD20) limited to senior housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6440, "no_votes": 2522, "total_votes": 8962, "percent_yes": 71.85896005355947, "percent_no": 28.14103994644053, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.155828", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.840722", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the zoning of a 1/2 acre vacant parcel of land-located at the southeast corner of Riverside Drive and Magnolia Avenue-from an administrative/professional office zone to a multi-family residential zone (RD20) limited to senior housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11981, "fingerprint": "2002|200200461|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200461|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c1e37307f0c8887e", "measure_id": "200200461", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO. Do voters authorize the potential development, construction, and/or acquisition of up to 5,000 low rent apartments and town homes scattered throughout the city for seniors, families, and persons with disabilities earning lower incomes? Any affirmative vote on this measure has no fiscal impact, nor does it grant approval for any specific project, as each would go through the public review process.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 178087, "no_votes": 78870, "total_votes": 256957, "percent_yes": 69.3061484995544, "percent_no": 30.693851500445604, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.042525", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.167568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.848203", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO. Do voters authorize the potential development, construction, and/or acquisition of up to 5,000 low rent apartments and town homes scattered throughout the city for seniors, families, and persons with disabilities earning lower incomes? Any affirmative vote on this measure has no fiscal impact, nor does it grant approval for any specific project, as each would go through the public review process.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9363, "fingerprint": "2002|200200020|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200020|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "122e5c2cf1236a88", "measure_id": "200200020", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the San Diego County Charter be amended to change the Treasurer/Tax Collector from an election to an appointive officer by the County Chief Administrative Officer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84611, "no_votes": 316752, "total_votes": 401363, "percent_yes": 21.08091677608549, "percent_no": 78.91908322391451, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.159070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.842737", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Diego County Charter be amended to change the Treasurer/Tax Collector from an election to an appointive officer by the County Chief Administrative Officer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9378, "fingerprint": "2002|200200268|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200268|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "175b313b7548af23", "measure_id": "200200268", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 111-Boulevard be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 214, "no_votes": 153, "total_votes": 367, "percent_yes": 58.31062670299727, "percent_no": 41.68937329700273, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.163422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.845477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 111-Boulevard be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11969, "fingerprint": "2002|200200449|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200449|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bb5ef744e171b77c", "measure_id": "200200449", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the expenditure limitation set forth in Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.24 (Proposition H, adopted 1982) be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7568, "no_votes": 14844, "total_votes": 22412, "percent_yes": 33.76762448688202, "percent_no": 66.23237551311797, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.038937", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.164238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.846028", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the expenditure limitation set forth in Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.24 (Proposition H, adopted 1982) be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9366, "fingerprint": "2002|200200089|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200089|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "88aab80d70363896", "measure_id": "200200089", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "AMENDS THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BY ADDING SUBSECTION (d) TO SECTION 41 GRANTING SUBPOENA POWER TO THE SAN DIEGO ETHICS COMMISSION. Shall the City Charter be amended to grant subpoena power to the San Diego Ethics Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107663, "no_votes": 53261, "total_votes": 160924, "percent_yes": 66.90301011657677, "percent_no": 33.096989883423234, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.159902", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.843278", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMENDS THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BY ADDING SUBSECTION (d) TO SECTION 41 GRANTING SUBPOENA POWER TO THE SAN DIEGO ETHICS COMMISSION. Shall the City Charter be amended to grant subpoena power to the San Diego Ethics Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9379, "fingerprint": "2002|200200269|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200269|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "eee83ac51af374c3", "measure_id": "200200269", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 112-Campo be approved, establishing special taxes in accordance with the amounts for each classification of land set forth in the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 202, "no_votes": 125, "total_votes": 327, "percent_yes": 61.7737003058104, "percent_no": 38.2262996941896, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.163692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.845661", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 112-Campo be approved, establishing special taxes in accordance with the amounts for each classification of land set forth in the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11970, "fingerprint": "2002|200200450|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200450|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "0343aca563b77fe7", "measure_id": "200200450", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do the voters of the City of Carlsbad approve spending city funds from various sources including the General Fund in an amount over $1 million to construct capital facilities, including a swimming pool complex, trails linkages and open space, a City/Safety training facility and a portion of Cannon Road east of College (Reach 4)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14830, "no_votes": 10010, "total_votes": 24840, "percent_yes": 59.70209339774557, "percent_no": 40.29790660225443, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.039229", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.164513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.846207", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do the voters of the City of Carlsbad approve spending city funds from various sources including the General Fund in an amount over $1 million to construct capital facilities, including a swimming pool complex, trails linkages and open space, a City/Safety training facility and a portion of Cannon Road east of College (Reach 4)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9367, "fingerprint": "2002|200200090|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200090|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "2fb823a46ca7de24", "measure_id": "200200090", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "AMENDS THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BY ADDING SECTION 141 CONCERNING THE CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Shall the City Charter be amended to change the vesting requirement of the City Employees' Retirement System from ten years to five years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78253, "no_votes": 81977, "total_votes": 160230, "percent_yes": 48.83792048929664, "percent_no": 51.16207951070336, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.160182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.843463", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMENDS THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BY ADDING SECTION 141 CONCERNING THE CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Shall the City Charter be amended to change the vesting requirement of the City Employees' Retirement System from ten years to five years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11971, "fingerprint": "2002|200200451|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200451|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "dbe8b5b6fca1f3bb", "measure_id": "200200451", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the Glorietta Bay Master Plan to require the Community Center gymnasium to be 94 feet long, and 70 wide, and include a high school regulation size basketball court of 84 feet by 50 feet be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2692, "no_votes": 3141, "total_votes": 5833, "percent_yes": 46.15120864049374, "percent_no": 53.84879135950626, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.039522", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.164790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.846391", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the Glorietta Bay Master Plan to require the Community Center gymnasium to be 94 feet long, and 70 wide, and include a high school regulation size basketball court of 84 feet by 50 feet be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9368, "fingerprint": "2002|200200091|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200091|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "eabd1af1f4a36642", "measure_id": "200200091", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "AMENDS THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BY ADDING SECTION 149 CONCERNING PUBLIC AGENCY PARTICIPATION IN THE CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Shall the City Charter be amended to allow public agencies other than the City to participate in the City Employees' Retirement System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91703, "no_votes": 63938, "total_votes": 155641, "percent_yes": 58.91956489613919, "percent_no": 41.08043510386081, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.160522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.843647", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMENDS THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BY ADDING SECTION 149 CONCERNING PUBLIC AGENCY PARTICIPATION IN THE CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Shall the City Charter be amended to allow public agencies other than the City to participate in the City Employees' Retirement System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9380, "fingerprint": "2002|200200270|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200270|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "81b4a642257c6c0a", "measure_id": "200200270", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the existing Pine Valley Sponsor Group be disbanded and a Pine Valley Planning Group be created consisting of thirteen members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 510, "no_votes": 266, "total_votes": 776, "percent_yes": 65.72164948453609, "percent_no": 34.27835051546391, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.163969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.845844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing Pine Valley Sponsor Group be disbanded and a Pine Valley Planning Group be created consisting of thirteen members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11972, "fingerprint": "2002|200200452|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200452|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "53a59961fc535c0f", "measure_id": "200200452", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance (1) mandating a basketball court in the Community Center gymnasium in the Glorietta Bay Master Plan of not less than 88 feet long and 50 feet wide, and (2) a height limitation not to exceed 35 feet be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3089, "no_votes": 2598, "total_votes": 5687, "percent_yes": 54.31686302092492, "percent_no": 45.68313697907508, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.039781", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.165055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.846570", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance (1) mandating a basketball court in the Community Center gymnasium in the Glorietta Bay Master Plan of not less than 88 feet long and 50 feet wide, and (2) a height limitation not to exceed 35 feet be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9369, "fingerprint": "2002|200200092|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200092|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "560f87b886081a43", "measure_id": "200200092", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "AMENDS THE SAN DIEGO CITY CHARTER BY ADDING SECTION 76.2 REGARDING GENERAL TAXES. Shall the Charter be amended to require that any tax increase in an existing general tax or imposition of any new general tax be levied by the Council only of the proposed levy has been approved by a two-thirds vote of the qualified City electors voting on the proposition?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 88616, "no_votes": 74227, "total_votes": 162843, "percent_yes": 54.41805911215096, "percent_no": 45.58194088784904, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.160792", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.843830", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMENDS THE SAN DIEGO CITY CHARTER BY ADDING SECTION 76.2 REGARDING GENERAL TAXES. Shall the Charter be amended to require that any tax increase in an existing general tax or imposition of any new general tax be levied by the Council only of the proposed levy has been approved by a two-thirds vote of the qualified City electors voting on the proposition?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11973, "fingerprint": "2002|200200453|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200453|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "60a2b71fa25f5be9", "measure_id": "200200453", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance limiting Mayors and Members of Coronado City Council  to two consecutive four-year terms be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4433, "no_votes": 1810, "total_votes": 6243, "percent_yes": 71.00752843184367, "percent_no": 28.992471568156333, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.040052", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.165320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.846751", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance limiting Mayors and Members of Coronado City Council  to two consecutive four-year terms be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9370, "fingerprint": "2002|200200093|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200093|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d6aba6c5da9ab406", "measure_id": "200200093", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "AMENDS THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BY ADDING SECTION 226, SUPER MAJORITY VOTE REQUIREMENTS. Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that, in order to be adopted or effective, any Charter amendment, ballot proposal, initiative, statute, law or regulation requiring a greater than simple majority vote of the electorate, and which is proposed to be adopted on or after the date of this election.  Must be adopted by the same proportionate vote of the electorate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 79678, "no_votes": 78501, "total_votes": 158179, "percent_yes": 50.3720468583061, "percent_no": 49.6279531416939, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.161096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.844011", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMENDS THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO BY ADDING SECTION 226, SUPER MAJORITY VOTE REQUIREMENTS. Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that, in order to be adopted or effective, any Charter amendment, ballot proposal, initiative, statute, law or regulation requiring a greater than simple majority vote of the electorate, and which is proposed to be adopted on or after the date of this election.  Must be adopted by the same proportionate vote of the electorate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11974, "fingerprint": "2002|200200454|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200454|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "32e892eaf6e1e3d5", "measure_id": "200200454", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the transient occupancy tax (TOT),  paid by hotel visitors, be increased to ten and one-half percent, a rate identical to that of the City of San Diego?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1449, "no_votes": 315, "total_votes": 1764, "percent_yes": 82.14285714285714, "percent_no": 17.85714285714286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.040332", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.165582", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.846930", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the transient occupancy tax (TOT),  paid by hotel visitors, be increased to ten and one-half percent, a rate identical to that of the City of San Diego?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9371, "fingerprint": "2002|200200094|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200094|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "56422a21fcf032f9", "measure_id": "200200094", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "AMENDS THE SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 56.54 PERTAINING TO ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION IN BEACH AREAS. Shall the San Diego Municipal Code be amended to prohibit alcohol consumption twenty-four hours per day in substantially all of Mission Beach and Specified beach areas of Pacific Beach from June 1, 2001, through December 31, 2002?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83718, "no_votes": 86710, "total_votes": 170428, "percent_yes": 49.12220996549862, "percent_no": 50.87779003450138, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.161372", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.844198", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AMENDS THE SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 56.54 PERTAINING TO ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION IN BEACH AREAS. Shall the San Diego Municipal Code be amended to prohibit alcohol consumption twenty-four hours per day in substantially all of Mission Beach and Specified beach areas of Pacific Beach from June 1, 2001, through December 31, 2002?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11975, "fingerprint": "2002|200200455|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200455|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "2691c90b098cae15", "measure_id": "200200455", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance, which mandates that the new public library be constructed at the Quail Gardens Drive North site rather than the Cornish Drive site chosen by action of the City Council, and which requires the library to be at least 25,000 square feet and establishes a policy to facilitate construction within 30 months of enactment of this ordinance, and which further requires allocation of all City Library Development Funds for that purpose, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6742, "no_votes": 11605, "total_votes": 18347, "percent_yes": 36.74715212296288, "percent_no": 63.25284787703712, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.040606", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.165858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.847113", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance, which mandates that the new public library be constructed at the Quail Gardens Drive North site rather than the Cornish Drive site chosen by action of the City Council, and which requires the library to be at least 25,000 square feet and establishes a policy to facilitate construction within 30 months of enactment of this ordinance, and which further requires allocation of all City Library Development Funds for that purpose, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9364, "fingerprint": "2002|200200087|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200087|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1e9dd84f04165654", "measure_id": "200200087", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "BONDS FOR NEW CITY LIBRARY. To qualify for matching funds provided by the State of California to build a new City library, with adequate space for books, children's reading programs, homework assistance, after-school programs, adult literacy programs and services for seniors, shall the City of National City be authorized to issue general obligation bonds up to a maximum principal amount of $6,000,000 to acquire and construct a new City library?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2840, "no_votes": 1027, "total_votes": 3867, "percent_yes": 73.4419446599431, "percent_no": 26.558055340056896, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.159371", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.842919", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BONDS FOR NEW CITY LIBRARY. To qualify for matching funds provided by the State of California to build a new City library, with adequate space for books, children's reading programs, homework assistance, after-school programs, adult literacy programs and services for seniors, shall the City of National City be authorized to issue general obligation bonds up to a maximum principal amount of $6,000,000 to acquire and construct a new City library?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11976, "fingerprint": "2002|200200456|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200456|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "dbc7528af22dd127", "measure_id": "200200456", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Escondido change the General Plan as summarized below and described in Resolution 2002-180RR? The southeastern corner of Citracado Parkway and Interstate-15 are designated Planned Commercial. Development will be lower in intensity than standard neighborhood centers, compatible with surrounding residential uses, and not obtrusive. Uses will be limited to day care, care facilities, professional/medical offices and treatment, veterinarians, veterinary hospitals, service organizations, and churches with large setbacks, extensive landscaping, and low-profile architecture.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14776, "no_votes": 7925, "total_votes": 22701, "percent_yes": 65.08964362803401, "percent_no": 34.91035637196599, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.040871", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.166217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.847293", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Escondido change the General Plan as summarized below and described in Resolution 2002-180RR? The southeastern corner of Citracado Parkway and Interstate-15 are designated Planned Commercial. Development will be lower in intensity than standard neighborhood centers, compatible with surrounding residential uses, and not obtrusive. Uses will be limited to day care, care facilities, professional/medical offices and treatment, veterinarians, veterinary hospitals, service organizations, and churches with large setbacks, extensive landscaping, and low-profile architecture.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9365, "fingerprint": "2002|200200088|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200088|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "115feba1d8a746f5", "measure_id": "200200088", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Poway be amended to allow fire stations on property having a natural slope in excess of ten percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7779, "no_votes": 1815, "total_votes": 9594, "percent_yes": 81.08192620387742, "percent_no": 18.918073796122584, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.159636", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.843099", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Poway be amended to allow fire stations on property having a natural slope in excess of ten percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11977, "fingerprint": "2002|200200457|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200457|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "05b8ff0a3863e7b8", "measure_id": "200200457", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing 2 year limit of office for the Mayor be made a 4 year term, consistent with that of City Councilmembers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3480, "no_votes": 1741, "total_votes": 5221, "percent_yes": 66.65389772074315, "percent_no": 33.346102279256854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.041157", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.166484", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.847475", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing 2 year limit of office for the Mayor be made a 4 year term, consistent with that of City Councilmembers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9372, "fingerprint": "2002|200200175|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200175|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b3cee109861cdea2", "measure_id": "200200175", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Escondido Union School District (\"District\") be authorized to issue $46,300,000 in bonds at the lowest available interest rate in order to acquire property and construct new schools to reduce overcrowding and accommodate enrollment growth, furnish and equip schools, and continue to upgrade and improve all District schools, addressing building safety and health issues, including upgrading electrical systems, remodeling restrooms/plumbing, improve accessibility for the disabled and making other necessary improvements to school sites and buildings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11635, "no_votes": 8368, "total_votes": 20003, "percent_yes": 58.16627505874119, "percent_no": 41.83372494125881, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.161704", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.844381", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Escondido Union School District (\"District\") be authorized to issue $46,300,000 in bonds at the lowest available interest rate in order to acquire property and construct new schools to reduce overcrowding and accommodate enrollment growth, furnish and equip schools, and continue to upgrade and improve all District schools, addressing building safety and health issues, including upgrading electrical systems, remodeling restrooms/plumbing, improve accessibility for the disabled and making other necessary improvements to school sites and buildings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11978, "fingerprint": "2002|200200458|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200458|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d57a2a8ed6245c17", "measure_id": "200200458", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council of the City of National City establish a Citizens' Police Oversight Commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4478, "no_votes": 2033, "total_votes": 6511, "percent_yes": 68.77591767777606, "percent_no": 31.224082322223936, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.041623", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.166772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.847656", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) Shall the City Council of the City of National City establish a Citizens' Police Oversight Commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9373, "fingerprint": "2002|200200176|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200176|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c4a9b2d322f0b3c0", "measure_id": "200200176", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve, repair, renovate, furnish and expand schools, classrooms, and instructional facilities; Improve safety and security for children and meet health, safety, technology and educational standards at every school, shall Fallbrook Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $32,000,000 in bonds, with all proceeds to benefit local children, at Interest rates within legal limits; subject to independent citizen oversight and annual audits; with no funds spent on salaries, or administration.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4299, "no_votes": 3676, "total_votes": 7975, "percent_yes": 53.90595611285266, "percent_no": 46.09404388714734, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.161988", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.844567", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve, repair, renovate, furnish and expand schools, classrooms, and instructional facilities; Improve safety and security for children and meet health, safety, technology and educational standards at every school, shall Fallbrook Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $32,000,000 in bonds, with all proceeds to benefit local children, at Interest rates within legal limits; subject to independent citizen oversight and annual audits; with no funds spent on salaries, or administration.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11979, "fingerprint": "2002|200200459|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200459|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ee3a93ad6e802930", "measure_id": "200200459", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Initiative ordinance known as \"El Corazon Dedicated Parkland Initiative\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17549, "no_votes": 17630, "total_votes": 35179, "percent_yes": 49.88487449899088, "percent_no": 50.11512550100912, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.041965", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.167034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.847838", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Initiative ordinance known as \"El Corazon Dedicated Parkland Initiative\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9374, "fingerprint": "2002|200200177|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200177|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7a8b0f5832671e20", "measure_id": "200200177", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Neighborhood School Repair Measure. To enhance student safety by installing fire safety, energy and emergency communication systems; upgrading electrical wiring, heating, ventilation, lighting, sewer, plumbing systems; constructing/acquiring/renovating/equipping classrooms/science/computer labs/libraries/facilities; repairing roofs; qualifying for State matching funds, shall La Mesa-Spring Valley Elementary School District issue $44,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen Oversight Committee to perform annual audits, prevent waste and ensure that no money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16326, "no_votes": 7152, "total_votes": 23478, "percent_yes": 69.53743930488116, "percent_no": 30.46256069511884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.162257", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.844750", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Neighborhood School Repair Measure. To enhance student safety by installing fire safety, energy and emergency communication systems; upgrading electrical wiring, heating, ventilation, lighting, sewer, plumbing systems; constructing/acquiring/renovating/equipping classrooms/science/computer labs/libraries/facilities; repairing roofs; qualifying for State matching funds, shall La Mesa-Spring Valley Elementary School District issue $44,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen Oversight Committee to perform annual audits, prevent waste and ensure that no money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11980, "fingerprint": "2002|200200460|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200460|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d8c98c0e74f35db4", "measure_id": "200200460", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance of the City of Poway be adopted which would increase the Transient Occupancy Tax from the current six percent to ten percent of a hotel or motel guest's room rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7881, "no_votes": 6614, "total_votes": 14495, "percent_yes": 54.37047257675061, "percent_no": 45.62952742324939, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.042247", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.167302", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.848022", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance of the City of Poway be adopted which would increase the Transient Occupancy Tax from the current six percent to ten percent of a hotel or motel guest's room rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9375, "fingerprint": "2002|200200178|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200178|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d00afedee70dce2b", "measure_id": "200200178", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve pupil overcrowding, shall the Ramona Unified School District issue $25 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate, and within legal limits, to build, acquire and equip a new middle school so long as no funds are used for administrative salaries and the spending of bond funds is reviewed by an independent citizen oversight committee as required by law.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3459, "no_votes": 3531, "total_votes": 6990, "percent_yes": 49.48497854077253, "percent_no": 50.51502145922747, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.162524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.844934", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve pupil overcrowding, shall the Ramona Unified School District issue $25 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate, and within legal limits, to build, acquire and equip a new middle school so long as no funds are used for administrative salaries and the spending of bond funds is reviewed by an independent citizen oversight committee as required by law.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11982, "fingerprint": "2002|200200462|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200462|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a869f62cb3fc6909", "measure_id": "200200462", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Solana Beach adopt a resolution, titled: \"A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, Amending the Land Use Plan Designation for the Rear Portion of Three Properties at 346, 356 and 364 Glencrest Drive Adjacent to the Northwest Corner of Skyline Elementary School from Public Institutional to Low Residential\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3021, "no_votes": 1227, "total_votes": 4248, "percent_yes": 71.11581920903954, "percent_no": 28.884180790960457, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.042802", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.167835", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.848383", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Solana Beach adopt a resolution, titled: \"A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, Amending the Land Use Plan Designation for the Rear Portion of Three Properties at 346, 356 and 364 Glencrest Drive Adjacent to the Northwest Corner of Skyline Elementary School from Public Institutional to Low Residential\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9376, "fingerprint": "2002|200200179|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200179|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b0c9477be09a02b1", "measure_id": "200200179", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding by funding the construction of new schools, classrooms, and instructional facilities; improve safety and security for children; repair and renovate aging schools to meet health, safety, and educational standards, shall Vista Unified School District be authorized to issue $140,000,000 in bonds, with all proceeds to benefit local children, at interest rates within legal limits; subject to independent citizen oversight and annual audits; with no funds spent on salaries or administration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17506, "no_votes": 8531, "total_votes": 26037, "percent_yes": 67.23508852786419, "percent_no": 32.76491147213581, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.162844", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.845114", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding by funding the construction of new schools, classrooms, and instructional facilities; improve safety and security for children; repair and renovate aging schools to meet health, safety, and educational standards, shall Vista Unified School District be authorized to issue $140,000,000 in bonds, with all proceeds to benefit local children, at interest rates within legal limits; subject to independent citizen oversight and annual audits; with no funds spent on salaries or administration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9381, "fingerprint": "2002|200200463|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200463|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "514571c3cb6b9172", "measure_id": "200200463", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To fund an adequate level of fire protection, fire suppression and advanced life support medical services necessary to protect residents of and property within the City of Solana Beach, shall the City of Solana Beach be authorized to increase the existing Fire Benefit Fee, established in 1980 not to exceed $10.00 per benefit unit per year, to an amount not to exceed $25.00 per benefit unit per year as provided for in Resolution No. 2002-71?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2725, "no_votes": 1671, "total_votes": 4396, "percent_yes": 61.98817106460418, "percent_no": 38.01182893539582, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.168106", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.848567", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund an adequate level of fire protection, fire suppression and advanced life support medical services necessary to protect residents of and property within the City of Solana Beach, shall the City of Solana Beach be authorized to increase the existing Fire Benefit Fee, established in 1980 not to exceed $10.00 per benefit unit per year, to an amount not to exceed $25.00 per benefit unit per year as provided for in Resolution No. 2002-71?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9386, "fingerprint": "2002|200200616|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200616|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "777e1ebf2e07759a", "measure_id": "200200616", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare our local Grossmont College and Cuyamaca College students for jobs and 4-year colleges by: Repairing leaking roofs, worn wiring/plumbing, aging restrooms: Relieving overcrowding: Renovating aging/deteriorating classrooms, labs: Repairing/acquiring/constructing/equipping college buildings, sites, and science/computer labs: Training medical workers/nurses and safety officers: shall Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District issue $207,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with Strict Accountability Safeguards including Citizen Oversight Committee, annual independent audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60622, "no_votes": 39929, "total_votes": 100551, "percent_yes": 60.28980318445366, "percent_no": 39.71019681554634, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.169564", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.849492", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare our local Grossmont College and Cuyamaca College students for jobs and 4-year colleges by: Repairing leaking roofs, worn wiring/plumbing, aging restrooms: Relieving overcrowding: Renovating aging/deteriorating classrooms, labs: Repairing/acquiring/constructing/equipping college buildings, sites, and science/computer labs: Training medical workers/nurses and safety officers: shall Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District issue $207,000,000 in bonds at legal rates with Strict Accountability Safeguards including Citizen Oversight Committee, annual independent audits, with no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9389, "fingerprint": "2002|200200619|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200619|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "eaac5eb326091e13", "measure_id": "200200619", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "City, Mesa and Miramar Colleges Classroom Repair and Public Safety Education Measure. To: Repair leaking roofs, worn wiring/plumbing: Renovate aging/deteriorating classrooms and libraries; Repair/acquire/construct/equip college buildings, sites and computer labs; Prepare students for 4-year colleges and jobs; Train nurses/firefighters/paramedics/police; Improve campus safety; shall San Diego Community College District issue $685,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits, with no bond money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140577, "no_votes": 64220, "total_votes": 204797, "percent_yes": 68.64211878103683, "percent_no": 31.357881218963172, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.170427", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.850039", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City, Mesa and Miramar Colleges Classroom Repair and Public Safety Education Measure. To: Repair leaking roofs, worn wiring/plumbing: Renovate aging/deteriorating classrooms and libraries; Repair/acquire/construct/equip college buildings, sites and computer labs; Prepare students for 4-year colleges and jobs; Train nurses/firefighters/paramedics/police; Improve campus safety; shall San Diego Community College District issue $685,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits, with no bond money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9385, "fingerprint": "2002|200200615|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200615|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "eee3392d69492a3f", "measure_id": "200200615", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Neighborhood School Repair Safety and Overcrowding Measure. To repair aging schools and improve student safety at every neighborhood high school by repairing leaky roofs, improving fire safety and school security systems, removing hazardous materials such as lead paint and asbestos, upgrading wiring for computer technology, and repairing/upgrading deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms, and science laboratories, shall Grossmont Union High School District, issue $199,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual financial audits, a Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64773, "no_votes": 36714, "total_votes": 101487, "percent_yes": 63.82393804132549, "percent_no": 36.17606195867451, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.169298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.849310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Neighborhood School Repair Safety and Overcrowding Measure. To repair aging schools and improve student safety at every neighborhood high school by repairing leaky roofs, improving fire safety and school security systems, removing hazardous materials such as lead paint and asbestos, upgrading wiring for computer technology, and repairing/upgrading deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms, and science laboratories, shall Grossmont Union High School District, issue $199,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with annual financial audits, a Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9387, "fingerprint": "2002|200200617|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200617|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "14c0ebcbff5f399a", "measure_id": "200200617", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct, rehabilitate, modernize or replace school facilities, including the furnishing and equipping of school facilities or the acquisition or lease of real property for schools, and in so doing increase safety and educational effectiveness of classrooms for students, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2002-01 of the Poway Unified School District issue not to exceed $198,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits and in accordance with the actions taken by the District's Board of Education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21958, "no_votes": 16294, "total_votes": 38252, "percent_yes": 57.403534455714734, "percent_no": 42.596465544285266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.169892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.849675", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, rehabilitate, modernize or replace school facilities, including the furnishing and equipping of school facilities or the acquisition or lease of real property for schools, and in so doing increase safety and educational effectiveness of classrooms for students, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2002-01 of the Poway Unified School District issue not to exceed $198,000,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits and in accordance with the actions taken by the District's Board of Education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9382, "fingerprint": "2002|200200612|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200612|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "22fbb94705708a7d", "measure_id": "200200612", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To purchase or acquire real property (including site preparation and environmental mitigation) for a high school and related facilities located within the Alpine Union School District (\"District\") subject to District unification, and make the District eligible to receive approximately $4 million in State matching funds shall the District be authorized to issue $12,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates: subject to citizen oversight and annual audits, with no funds spent on salaries or administration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2514, "no_votes": 3020, "total_votes": 5534, "percent_yes": 45.42826165522226, "percent_no": 54.57173834477774, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.168383", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.848752", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To purchase or acquire real property (including site preparation and environmental mitigation) for a high school and related facilities located within the Alpine Union School District (\"District\") subject to District unification, and make the District eligible to receive approximately $4 million in State matching funds shall the District be authorized to issue $12,000,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates: subject to citizen oversight and annual audits, with no funds spent on salaries or administration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9383, "fingerprint": "2002|200200613|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200613|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a61632bdbb8a7e18", "measure_id": "200200613", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct, acquire, improve and equip school facilities within the Alpine Union School District (\"District\"), construct a high school (allowing students to attend high school locally) subject to District unification, and make the District eligible to receive approximately $15 million in State matching funds shall the District be authorized to issue $26,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates; subject to citizen oversight and annual audits; with no funds spent on salaries or administration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2468, "no_votes": 3064, "total_votes": 5532, "percent_yes": 44.61315979754157, "percent_no": 55.38684020245843, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.168765", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.848941", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, acquire, improve and equip school facilities within the Alpine Union School District (\"District\"), construct a high school (allowing students to attend high school locally) subject to District unification, and make the District eligible to receive approximately $15 million in State matching funds shall the District be authorized to issue $26,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates; subject to citizen oversight and annual audits; with no funds spent on salaries or administration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9384, "fingerprint": "2002|200200614|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200614|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "735663df70be050c", "measure_id": "200200614", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve, repair, renovate, furnish and expand schools, classrooms, and instructional facilities; Improve safety and security for children and meet health, safety, technology and educational standards at every school, shall Fallbrook Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $32,000,000 in bonds, with all proceeds to benefit local children, at interest rates within legal limits; subject to independent citizen oversight and annual audits; with no funds spent on salaries or administration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6199, "no_votes": 4532, "total_votes": 10731, "percent_yes": 57.76721647563134, "percent_no": 42.23278352436866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.169033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.849126", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve, repair, renovate, furnish and expand schools, classrooms, and instructional facilities; Improve safety and security for children and meet health, safety, technology and educational standards at every school, shall Fallbrook Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $32,000,000 in bonds, with all proceeds to benefit local children, at interest rates within legal limits; subject to independent citizen oversight and annual audits; with no funds spent on salaries or administration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9388, "fingerprint": "2002|200200618|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200618|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "0565d109905dfee1", "measure_id": "200200618", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Rancho Santa Fe School District Overcrowding and Classroom Renovation Measure. To reduce school overcrowding, purchase two school sites outside Rancho Santa Fe Covenant, improve student safety, construct/equip a new K-8 school, construct/repair/renovate/equip permanent buildings at existing school, including, at new and current schools, classrooms, science labs, computer technology, libraries, shall Rancho Santa Fe School District issue $46,000,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to perform annual financial audits, prevent waste, and ensure no money is used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1194, "no_votes": 1502, "total_votes": 2696, "percent_yes": 44.28783382789317, "percent_no": 55.71216617210683, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.170160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.849858", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Rancho Santa Fe School District Overcrowding and Classroom Renovation Measure. To reduce school overcrowding, purchase two school sites outside Rancho Santa Fe Covenant, improve student safety, construct/equip a new K-8 school, construct/repair/renovate/equip permanent buildings at existing school, including, at new and current schools, classrooms, science labs, computer technology, libraries, shall Rancho Santa Fe School District issue $46,000,000 of bonds at legal rates and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to perform annual financial audits, prevent waste, and ensure no money is used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9377, "fingerprint": "2002|200200267|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200267|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "59455fbf77ca14b7", "measure_id": "200200267", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the existing Campo/Lake Moreno Sponsor Group be disabled and a Campo/Lake Moreno Planning Group be created consisting of nine members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 442, "no_votes": 327, "total_votes": 769, "percent_yes": 57.47724317295189, "percent_no": 42.52275682704811, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.163110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.845294", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing Campo/Lake Moreno Sponsor Group be disabled and a Campo/Lake Moreno Planning Group be created consisting of nine members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11983, "fingerprint": "2002|200200271|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200271|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "405b81bc29eae779", "measure_id": "200200271", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS AND IMPOSITION OF SURCHARGE ON RETAIL WATER CUSTOMERS. Shall the Public Utilities Commission, or any successor thereto, issue revenue bonds and/or other forms of revenue financing in a principal amount not to exceed $1,628,000,000 (the \"Bonds\"), to finance the acquistion and construction of improvements to the City's water system; provided that the bonds may not be issued unless Admininstrative Code Chapter 37 (Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance) is amended to provide that landlords may pass through to residential tenants 50% of the water bill costs attributable to water rate increases resulting from issuance of the Bonds where a unit is in compliance with any applicable laws regarding water conservation devices, tenants may file hardship applications with the Rent Board for relief from all or part of the cost passthrough and their affected landlords may utilize any available Public Utiliities Commission low-income rate discount program or similar program for water bill reduction based on the tenants' hardship status; and further provide that the prinicipal amount of the Bonds may be reduced if the City's Board of Supervisors determines the greatest economic value to San Francisco ratepayers will derive from having the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water System Financing Authority finance, in whole or in part, those projects designed and intended in substantial part to improve the reliability of the City's regional water system, and if the Authority does finance such projects, shall the Public Utilities Commission be authorized to impose a surcharge on retail water rates for San Francisco customer' to pay the retail water customer's share of the debt service on bonds issued by the Authority and the operating expenses of the Authority?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 105468, "no_votes": 92577, "total_votes": 198045, "percent_yes": 53.254563356812845, "percent_no": 46.745436643187155, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.047462", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.172839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.851482", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS AND IMPOSITION OF SURCHARGE ON RETAIL WATER CUSTOMERS. Shall the Public Utilities Commission, or any successor thereto, issue revenue bonds and/or other forms of revenue financing in a principal amount not to exceed $1,628,000,000 (the \"Bonds\"), to finance the acquistion and construction of improvements to the City's water system; provided that the bonds may not be issued unless Admininstrative Code Chapter 37 (Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance) is amended to provide that landlords may pass through to residential tenants 50% of the water bill costs attributable to water rate increases resulting from issuance of the Bonds where a unit is in compliance with any applicable laws regarding water conservation devices, tenants may file hardship applications with the Rent Board for relief from all or part of the cost passthrough and their affected landlords may utilize any available Public Utiliities Commission low-income rate discount program or similar program for water bill reduction based on the tenants' hardship status; and further provide that the prinicipal amount of the Bonds may be reduced if the City's Board of Supervisors determines the greatest economic value to San Francisco ratepayers will derive from having the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water System Financing Authority finance, in whole or in part, those projects designed and intended in substantial part to improve the reliability of the City's regional water system, and if the Authority does finance such projects, shall the Public Utilities Commission be authorized to impose a surcharge on retail water rates for San Francisco customer' to pay the retail water customer's share of the debt service on bonds issued by the Authority and the operating expenses of the Authority?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9390, "fingerprint": "2002|200200021|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200021|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "107737af33df7c09", "measure_id": "200200021", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City use instant run-off voting to elect City officers with a majority of votes without separate run-off elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76340, "no_votes": 61261, "total_votes": 137601, "percent_yes": 55.47924797058161, "percent_no": 44.52075202941839, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.170800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.850219", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City use instant run-off voting to elect City officers with a majority of votes without separate run-off elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11984, "fingerprint": "2002|200200272|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200272|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6de0311803050ded", "measure_id": "200200272", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "AFFORDABLE HOUSING BONDS, 2002.  Shall the City and County of San Francisco (or one of its agencies, departments enterprises) issue bonds and/or other forms of financing in a principal amount not exceed $250,000,000, to finance the acquisition, construction and/or rehabilitation of housing affordable to low- and moderate-income first-time homebuyers and authorize landlords to passthrough to residential tenants in units subject to Chapter 37 of the San Francisco Administrative Code (the Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance) 50% of the increase in the real property taxes attributable to the cost of repayment of the bond?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117752, "no_votes": 93135, "total_votes": 210887, "percent_yes": 55.8365380511838, "percent_no": 44.1634619488162, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.047728", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.173151", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.851678", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AFFORDABLE HOUSING BONDS, 2002.  Shall the City and County of San Francisco (or one of its agencies, departments enterprises) issue bonds and/or other forms of financing in a principal amount not exceed $250,000,000, to finance the acquisition, construction and/or rehabilitation of housing affordable to low- and moderate-income first-time homebuyers and authorize landlords to passthrough to residential tenants in units subject to Chapter 37 of the San Francisco Administrative Code (the Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance) 50% of the increase in the real property taxes attributable to the cost of repayment of the bond?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9391, "fingerprint": "2002|200200022|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200022|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "5eb3d8f7d31cc86c", "measure_id": "200200022", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City change the way it pays cost of living increases to retired employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83687, "no_votes": 48356, "total_votes": 132043, "percent_yes": 63.3785963663352, "percent_no": 36.6214036336648, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.171128", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.850401", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change the way it pays cost of living increases to retired employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11985, "fingerprint": "2002|200200273|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200273|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a93ecfa1510a5ef5", "measure_id": "200200273", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "VETERANS BUILDING SEISMIC SAFETY BONDS, 2002.  Shall the City incur $122,755,000 of bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, rehabilitation, renovation, improvement, construction, and/or reconstruction of the San Francisco War Memorial Veterans Building, and all other works, property and structures necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes, and reduce the property tax impact by requiring the application of available revenues of the War Memorial Special Fund to pay the principal and redemption price of, interest on, reserve fund deposits, if any, and/or financing costs for the obligations to be authorized hereby?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 112475, "no_votes": 92042, "total_votes": 204517, "percent_yes": 54.99542825290808, "percent_no": 45.00457174709192, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.047995", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.173421", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.851867", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "VETERANS BUILDING SEISMIC SAFETY BONDS, 2002.  Shall the City incur $122,755,000 of bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, rehabilitation, renovation, improvement, construction, and/or reconstruction of the San Francisco War Memorial Veterans Building, and all other works, property and structures necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes, and reduce the property tax impact by requiring the application of available revenues of the War Memorial Special Fund to pay the principal and redemption price of, interest on, reserve fund deposits, if any, and/or financing costs for the obligations to be authorized hereby?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9392, "fingerprint": "2002|200200023|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200023|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "7c8459765ed4e8fa", "measure_id": "200200023", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City permit individuals who are not U.S. citizens to serve on San Francisco boards, commissions, and advisory bodies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44157, "no_votes": 94895, "total_votes": 139052, "percent_yes": 31.75574605183672, "percent_no": 68.24425394816328, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.171401", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.850586", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City permit individuals who are not U.S. citizens to serve on San Francisco boards, commissions, and advisory bodies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11986, "fingerprint": "2002|200200274|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200274|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3c099eb43c08c701", "measure_id": "200200274", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City change the authority and duties of the Public Utilities Commission to make it the primary provider of electricity to San Francisco residents and businesses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95835, "no_votes": 111255, "total_votes": 207090, "percent_yes": 46.276981022743726, "percent_no": 53.723018977256274, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.048271", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.173700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.852052", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change the authority and duties of the Public Utilities Commission to make it the primary provider of electricity to San Francisco residents and businesses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9393, "fingerprint": "2002|200200024|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200024|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b309bd8d6d883c91", "measure_id": "200200024", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City change the way members of the Planning Commission and Board of Appeals are appointed and removed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73992, "no_votes": 55485, "total_votes": 129477, "percent_yes": 57.14682916657012, "percent_no": 42.85317083342988, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.171671", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.850766", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change the way members of the Planning Commission and Board of Appeals are appointed and removed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11987, "fingerprint": "2002|200200275|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200275|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "8cf2f93177b3b7a1", "measure_id": "200200275", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase the authority and duties of the Public Utilities Commission concerning its water and sewer utilities, use surplus funds from its utilities to operate and maintain the utilities before transferring any surplus to the General Fund, and end early the water and sewer rate freeze?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108080, "no_votes": 87482, "total_votes": 195562, "percent_yes": 55.26636054039128, "percent_no": 44.73363945960872, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.048536", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.173966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.852231", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the authority and duties of the Public Utilities Commission concerning its water and sewer utilities, use surplus funds from its utilities to operate and maintain the utilities before transferring any surplus to the General Fund, and end early the water and sewer rate freeze?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9394, "fingerprint": "2002|200200025|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200025|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "09260d87c26b3742", "measure_id": "200200025", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City permit employees who retired before 1995 to make their domestic partners eligible to receive survivor benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 90431, "no_votes": 47193, "total_votes": 137624, "percent_yes": 65.70874266116375, "percent_no": 34.291257338836246, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.171937", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.850945", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City permit employees who retired before 1995 to make their domestic partners eligible to receive survivor benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11988, "fingerprint": "2002|200200276|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200276|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "fda9c2e1a34dd3b9", "measure_id": "200200276", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Mayor appoint four members of the new Entertainment Commission, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors, and shall the Board of Supervisors appoint the other three members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 113470, "no_votes": 86627, "total_votes": 200097, "percent_yes": 56.70749686402095, "percent_no": 43.29250313597905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.048792", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.174229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.852411", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mayor appoint four members of the new Entertainment Commission, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors, and shall the Board of Supervisors appoint the other three members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9395, "fingerprint": "2002|200200026|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200026|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "984732fceeaedf18", "measure_id": "200200026", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create a committee to oversee how it spends bond money?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95012, "no_votes": 39929, "total_votes": 134941, "percent_yes": 70.4100310506073, "percent_no": 29.5899689493927, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.172236", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.851124", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create a committee to oversee how it spends bond money?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11989, "fingerprint": "2002|200200277|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200277|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "cd45672fb7e8f40a", "measure_id": "200200277", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City clarify and modify the role of City employees and the Sheriff in election, and the restriction on Elections and Ethics Commission members, their staffs and the City Attorney?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 141052, "no_votes": 52467, "total_votes": 193519, "percent_yes": 72.8879334845674, "percent_no": 27.112066515432602, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.049079", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.174558", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.852590", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City clarify and modify the role of City employees and the Sheriff in election, and the restriction on Elections and Ethics Commission members, their staffs and the City Attorney?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9396, "fingerprint": "2002|200200027|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200027|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "5c4a44d9f4032c6a", "measure_id": "200200027", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City prohibit new outdoor commercial advertising signs and regulate relocation of existing outdoor commercial advertising signs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108988, "no_votes": 28736, "total_votes": 137724, "percent_yes": 79.13508175771834, "percent_no": 20.86491824228166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.172502", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.851303", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City prohibit new outdoor commercial advertising signs and regulate relocation of existing outdoor commercial advertising signs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9397, "fingerprint": "2002|200200278|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200278|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b19c80e775580c9a", "measure_id": "200200278", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase retirement benefits for police and firefighters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 132440, "no_votes": 73653, "total_votes": 206093, "percent_yes": 64.26225053737875, "percent_no": 35.73774946262125, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.174825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.852774", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase retirement benefits for police and firefighters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9398, "fingerprint": "2002|200200279|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200279|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f283d2e9a8e13f4d", "measure_id": "200200279", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City provide up to 12 or 16 weeks of paid leave for City employees who take time off after the birth, adoption or foster care placement of a child?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 111600, "no_votes": 96033, "total_votes": 207633, "percent_yes": 53.748681567958855, "percent_no": 46.251318432041145, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.175088", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.852955", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City provide up to 12 or 16 weeks of paid leave for City employees who take time off after the birth, adoption or foster care placement of a child?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9399, "fingerprint": "2002|200200280|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200280|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "157906ea9ce021e0", "measure_id": "200200280", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the members of the Board of Supervisors serve full-time and shall the Civil Service Commission set the salaries for Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 111646, "no_votes": 89351, "total_votes": 200997, "percent_yes": 55.546102678149424, "percent_no": 44.453897321850576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.175353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.853134", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the members of the Board of Supervisors serve full-time and shall the Civil Service Commission set the salaries for Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9400, "fingerprint": "2002|200200281|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200281|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ce9d27d623f0dc6f", "measure_id": "200200281", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City change the process and criteria for selection of official newspapers for publishing public notices?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71756, "no_votes": 119931, "total_votes": 191687, "percent_yes": 37.43394179052309, "percent_no": 62.56605820947691, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.175615", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.853316", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change the process and criteria for selection of official newspapers for publishing public notices?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9401, "fingerprint": "2002|200200282|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200282|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0157d2f622a5d962", "measure_id": "200200282", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase its tax on the sale or transfer of real estate worth $1,000,000 or more from $3.75 to $7.50 for each $500 of value?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92163, "no_votes": 113902, "total_votes": 206065, "percent_yes": 44.72520806541625, "percent_no": 55.27479193458375, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.175879", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.853499", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase its tax on the sale or transfer of real estate worth $1,000,000 or more from $3.75 to $7.50 for each $500 of value?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9402, "fingerprint": "2002|200200283|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200283|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "48c6574ceb6a4adb", "measure_id": "200200283", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City give new duties to its Office of Economic Development and shall the City use money from its business registration tax to promote economic and business development?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 93404, "no_votes": 98127, "total_votes": 191531, "percent_yes": 48.76704032245433, "percent_no": 51.23295967754567, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.176143", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.853686", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City give new duties to its Office of Economic Development and shall the City use money from its business registration tax to promote economic and business development?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9403, "fingerprint": "2002|200200284|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200284|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "7e27d6359fa4225d", "measure_id": "200200284", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City change the way it provides assistance to qualified homeless individuals by counting the value of housing, shelter and meal services as part of their cash benefit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125436, "no_votes": 84433, "total_votes": 209869, "percent_yes": 59.768712863738806, "percent_no": 40.231287136261194, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.176439", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.853867", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change the way it provides assistance to qualified homeless individuals by counting the value of housing, shelter and meal services as part of their cash benefit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9404, "fingerprint": "2002|200200285|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200285|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "02f57e1a8be4f59e", "measure_id": "200200285", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create new housing and drug treatment programs, and shall the City meet certain conditions before counting the value of services provided to homeless individuals as part of their cash benefit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 98341, "no_votes": 106257, "total_votes": 204598, "percent_yes": 48.06547473582342, "percent_no": 51.93452526417658, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.176736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.854049", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create new housing and drug treatment programs, and shall the City meet certain conditions before counting the value of services provided to homeless individuals as part of their cash benefit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9405, "fingerprint": "2002|200200286|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200286|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "768e064179784dc4", "measure_id": "200200286", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create a committee to oversee its use of utility revenue bond funds, and report whether these funds are used for authorized purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 109577, "no_votes": 83843, "total_votes": 193420, "percent_yes": 56.652362733946845, "percent_no": 43.347637266053155, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.177001", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.854229", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create a committee to oversee its use of utility revenue bond funds, and report whether these funds are used for authorized purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9406, "fingerprint": "2002|200200287|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200287|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "fbe6e3e7d976fc76", "measure_id": "200200287", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City prohibit recipients of City contracts, grants, and loans from using City funds for political campaigns, and require at least ten audits each year to check for compliance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 131117, "no_votes": 63822, "total_votes": 194939, "percent_yes": 67.26052765223993, "percent_no": 32.73947234776007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.177289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.854408", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City prohibit recipients of City contracts, grants, and loans from using City funds for political campaigns, and require at least ten audits each year to check for compliance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9407, "fingerprint": "2002|200200288|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200288|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "1d583396148368cf", "measure_id": "200200288", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City allow apartment buildings of any size to be converted to condominiums, and increase the number of units that can be converted each year, subject to certain tenant protections and certain planning exceptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82089, "no_votes": 123129, "total_votes": 205218, "percent_yes": 40.000877116042446, "percent_no": 59.999122883957554, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.177554", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.854591", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City allow apartment buildings of any size to be converted to condominiums, and increase the number of units that can be converted each year, subject to certain tenant protections and certain planning exceptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9408, "fingerprint": "2002|200200289|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200289|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "aed60b65d6e6a6b2", "measure_id": "200200289", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to consider growing and distributing marijuana for medical use?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 127661, "no_votes": 78181, "total_votes": 205842, "percent_yes": 62.018927138290536, "percent_no": 37.981072861709464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.177846", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.854774", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to consider growing and distributing marijuana for medical use?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9423, "fingerprint": "2002|200200623|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200623|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "f1ea7a71e4951358", "measure_id": "200200623", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize Oakdale High and enlarge its campus, modernize existing and build new elementary schools, replace portables, build new high school and junior high library/media centers, build new aquatic center and athletic fields at high school, and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District issue $20 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28, "no_votes": 16, "total_votes": 44, "percent_yes": 63.63636363636363, "percent_no": 36.36363636363637, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.182146", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.857616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize Oakdale High and enlarge its campus, modernize existing and build new elementary schools, replace portables, build new high school and junior high library/media centers, build new aquatic center and athletic fields at high school, and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District issue $20 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9411, "fingerprint": "2002|200200096|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200096|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "f2a7bd4feeed34a6", "measure_id": "200200096", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 012-01 C.S. adopted by the Stockton City Council on May 1, 2001, be approved to authorize a one percent (1%) decrease, from the current eight percent (8%), to seven percent (7%), effective July 1, 2002, and from seven percent (7%) to six percent (6%), effective July 1, 2003, of the City of Stockton's Utility User Tax, the addition of an additional energy tax rebate incentive to the Enterprise Zone, and the addition of energy tax rebate incentives to the MX (Mixed Use) Zone.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13915, "no_votes": 17411, "total_votes": 31326, "percent_yes": 44.41997063142437, "percent_no": 55.58002936857563, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.178672", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.855317", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 012-01 C.S. adopted by the Stockton City Council on May 1, 2001, be approved to authorize a one percent (1%) decrease, from the current eight percent (8%), to seven percent (7%), effective July 1, 2002, and from seven percent (7%) to six percent (6%), effective July 1, 2003, of the City of Stockton's Utility User Tax, the addition of an additional energy tax rebate incentive to the Enterprise Zone, and the addition of energy tax rebate incentives to the MX (Mixed Use) Zone.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9415, "fingerprint": "2002|200200182|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200182|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "30e762c779ee067f", "measure_id": "200200182", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of schools, to relieve overcrowding, to improve the likelihood of our schools qualifying for state matching funds, shall the Ripon Unified School District issue $10 million of bonds, at legal interest rates within the legal limit to finance the modernization and expansion of Ripon High School and a portion of the costs of constructing a new elementary school and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits?  The District's Board has evaluated safety, class size reduction and information technology needs.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2060, "no_votes": 1475, "total_votes": 3535, "percent_yes": 58.27439886845828, "percent_no": 41.72560113154172, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.179786", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.856147", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of schools, to relieve overcrowding, to improve the likelihood of our schools qualifying for state matching funds, shall the Ripon Unified School District issue $10 million of bonds, at legal interest rates within the legal limit to finance the modernization and expansion of Ripon High School and a portion of the costs of constructing a new elementary school and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits?  The District's Board has evaluated safety, class size reduction and information technology needs.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9414, "fingerprint": "2002|200200181|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200181|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "4497b65b9160e3a4", "measure_id": "200200181", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To plan and construct up to twelve (12) new schools; to acquire, construct, renovate, furnish and equip school facilities and grounds; add structures to existing schools; upgrade certain classrooms; and upgrade fire and safety systems; shall the Lodi Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of not to exceed $109,360,000, the rate of interest thereon not to exceed the maximum rate allowable by law, and establish an oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15881, "no_votes": 11946, "total_votes": 27827, "percent_yes": 57.0704711251662, "percent_no": 42.9295288748338, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.179491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.855959", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To plan and construct up to twelve (12) new schools; to acquire, construct, renovate, furnish and equip school facilities and grounds; add structures to existing schools; upgrade certain classrooms; and upgrade fire and safety systems; shall the Lodi Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of not to exceed $109,360,000, the rate of interest thereon not to exceed the maximum rate allowable by law, and establish an oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9409, "fingerprint": "2002|200200028|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200028|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "fb58c26d83f776e0", "measure_id": "200200028", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Without increasing local taxes, by utilizing federal or State funding, shall public or publicly assisted housing providers, within San Joaquin County, acquire, rehabilitate and/or convert housing project(s) into decent, safe, sanitary and uncrowded units for low-income, elderly, or handicapped persons, up to 500 units annually, for ten years, with any unused units carried over annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 48653, "no_votes": 34241, "total_votes": 82894, "percent_yes": 58.69302965232707, "percent_no": 41.30697034767293, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.178138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.854953", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing local taxes, by utilizing federal or State funding, shall public or publicly assisted housing providers, within San Joaquin County, acquire, rehabilitate and/or convert housing project(s) into decent, safe, sanitary and uncrowded units for low-income, elderly, or handicapped persons, up to 500 units annually, for ten years, with any unused units carried over annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9412, "fingerprint": "2002|200200097|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200097|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "a4e90fae4df40848", "measure_id": "200200097", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City's transient occupancy tax, imposed on transients and used by the City's General Fund to fund a variety of activities, including: police and fire services, tourism promotion, planned cultural arts center activities, and parks and recreation youth and senior activities, be set at 10% of the amount of rent charged by the hotel operation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4742, "no_votes": 2203, "total_votes": 6945, "percent_yes": 68.27933765298776, "percent_no": 31.720662347012237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.178935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.855497", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's transient occupancy tax, imposed on transients and used by the City's General Fund to fund a variety of activities, including: police and fire services, tourism promotion, planned cultural arts center activities, and parks and recreation youth and senior activities, be set at 10% of the amount of rent charged by the hotel operation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9413, "fingerprint": "2002|200200180|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200180|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "e7aada4c95cf0bf3", "measure_id": "200200180", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make essential health, safety and building repairs at aging school facilities, increase energy efficiency, relieve severe overcrowding by acquiring, constructing or renovating school sites, and qualify for state construction matching funds, shall Linden Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds not exceeding Eleven Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars at the lowest interest rates possible, establish a Community Oversight Committee, and conduct annual audits to ensure funds are only spent on school construction projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1574, "no_votes": 1303, "total_votes": 2877, "percent_yes": 54.70976711852624, "percent_no": 45.29023288147376, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.179200", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.855734", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make essential health, safety and building repairs at aging school facilities, increase energy efficiency, relieve severe overcrowding by acquiring, constructing or renovating school sites, and qualify for state construction matching funds, shall Linden Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds not exceeding Eleven Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars at the lowest interest rates possible, establish a Community Oversight Committee, and conduct annual audits to ensure funds are only spent on school construction projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9410, "fingerprint": "2002|200200095|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200095|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "e1a2167c1183a852", "measure_id": "200200095", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to re-adopt and validate continuing collection of the City's Supplemental Transient Occupancy Tax, at a rate of 4%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4099, "no_votes": 2693, "total_votes": 6792, "percent_yes": 60.350412249705535, "percent_no": 39.649587750294465, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.178405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.855135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to re-adopt and validate continuing collection of the City's Supplemental Transient Occupancy Tax, at a rate of 4%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9422, "fingerprint": "2002|200200622|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200622|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "e7aada4c95cf0bf3", "measure_id": "200200622", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make essential health, safety and building repairs at aging school facilities, increase energy efficiency, relieve severe overcrowding by acquiring, constructing or renovating school sites, and qualify for state construction matching funds, shall Linden Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds not exceeding Eleven Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars at the lowest interest rates possible, establish a Community Oversight Committee, and conduct annual audits to ensure funds are only spent on school construction projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2099, "no_votes": 1665, "total_votes": 3764, "percent_yes": 55.76514346439958, "percent_no": 44.23485653560042, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.181865", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.857435", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make essential health, safety and building repairs at aging school facilities, increase energy efficiency, relieve severe overcrowding by acquiring, constructing or renovating school sites, and qualify for state construction matching funds, shall Linden Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds not exceeding Eleven Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars at the lowest interest rates possible, establish a Community Oversight Committee, and conduct annual audits to ensure funds are only spent on school construction projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9421, "fingerprint": "2002|200200621|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200621|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "b5c3a65e238d3bf0", "measure_id": "200200621", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide a performing arts center, cafeteria and library at Escalon High School and provide a multipurpose center/gymnasium with performing arts practice rooms for music, band and choir at El Portal Middle School, shall Escalon Unified School District issue $7,500,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a detailed project list, a citizen oversight committee and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2402, "no_votes": 1129, "total_votes": 3531, "percent_yes": 68.02605494194279, "percent_no": 31.97394505805721, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.181481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.857253", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide a performing arts center, cafeteria and library at Escalon High School and provide a multipurpose center/gymnasium with performing arts practice rooms for music, band and choir at El Portal Middle School, shall Escalon Unified School District issue $7,500,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a detailed project list, a citizen oversight committee and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9416, "fingerprint": "2002|200200464|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200464|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "7d27247c3e874fde", "measure_id": "200200464", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1714 Increasing the Hotel-Motel Occupancy Tax Collection Rate From 9% to 10% be Enacted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5424, "no_votes": 8328, "total_votes": 13752, "percent_yes": 39.44153577661431, "percent_no": 60.55846422338569, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.180064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.856336", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1714 Increasing the Hotel-Motel Occupancy Tax Collection Rate From 9% to 10% be Enacted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9417, "fingerprint": "2002|200200465|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200465|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "0ba8c59153921730", "measure_id": "200200465", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City's transient occupancy tax, imposed on transients and used by the City's General Fund to fund a variety of activities, including public safety, police, health and safety, administrative and economic development functions of the City, be set at 10% of the amount of rent charged by the hotel operator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2127, "no_votes": 932, "total_votes": 3059, "percent_yes": 69.53252696959791, "percent_no": 30.46747303040209, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.180334", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.856519", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's transient occupancy tax, imposed on transients and used by the City's General Fund to fund a variety of activities, including public safety, police, health and safety, administrative and economic development functions of the City, be set at 10% of the amount of rent charged by the hotel operator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9424, "fingerprint": "2002|200200624|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200624|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "42e979e0aa6d7f7c", "measure_id": "200200624", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide modern, safe learning environments for high school students by constructing a new Tracy High; adding physical education facilities, stadium and auditorium to West High; renovating essential classrooms/bathrooms/core facilities for career-technical education and community uses at existing Tracy High and qualifying for state matching funds for these projects; and for other specified projects; shall Tracy Joint Unified School District issue $103,000,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with annual audits, and a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7463, "no_votes": 7456, "total_votes": 14919, "percent_yes": 50.023460017427446, "percent_no": 49.976539982572554, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.182412", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.857914", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide modern, safe learning environments for high school students by constructing a new Tracy High; adding physical education facilities, stadium and auditorium to West High; renovating essential classrooms/bathrooms/core facilities for career-technical education and community uses at existing Tracy High and qualifying for state matching funds for these projects; and for other specified projects; shall Tracy Joint Unified School District issue $103,000,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with annual audits, and a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9420, "fingerprint": "2002|200200620|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200620|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "41e39830e2691369", "measure_id": "200200620", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Banta Elementary School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements including restroom improvements, upgrade school facilities, update inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to computers and modern technology, renovate the school by issuing $800,000 of bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 216, "no_votes": 102, "total_votes": 318, "percent_yes": 67.9245283018868, "percent_no": 32.075471698113205, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.181191", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.857072", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Banta Elementary School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements including restroom improvements, upgrade school facilities, update inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to computers and modern technology, renovate the school by issuing $800,000 of bonds, within legal interest rates, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9418, "fingerprint": "2002|200200466|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200466|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "1ab856251ed58ae6", "measure_id": "200200466", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Approval of the City of Stockton Charter Amendment relating to length of the probationary period for original/entry level appointments to the position of Firefighter.  Shall the Charter of the City of Stockton be amended to increase the probationary period for original/entry level appointments to the position of Firefighter from twelve (12) months to eighteen (18) months?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23307, "no_votes": 18692, "total_votes": 41999, "percent_yes": 55.49417843281983, "percent_no": 44.50582156718017, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.180631", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.856705", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approval of the City of Stockton Charter Amendment relating to length of the probationary period for original/entry level appointments to the position of Firefighter.  Shall the Charter of the City of Stockton be amended to increase the probationary period for original/entry level appointments to the position of Firefighter from twelve (12) months to eighteen (18) months?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9419, "fingerprint": "2002|200200467|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200467|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "b83a0ed585c43767", "measure_id": "200200467", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Utility User Tax Reduction Measure.  Shall an Ordinance be adopted to amend the Stockton Municipal Code to reduce the City of Stockton's user tax for telecommunication, gas, electricity, water, and video services from the current eight percent (8%) to two percent (2%), commencing July 1, 2003?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16260, "no_votes": 22444, "total_votes": 38704, "percent_yes": 42.0111616370401, "percent_no": 57.9888383629599, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.180924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.856890", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Utility User Tax Reduction Measure.  Shall an Ordinance be adopted to amend the Stockton Municipal Code to reduce the City of Stockton's user tax for telecommunication, gas, electricity, water, and video services from the current eight percent (8%) to two percent (2%), commencing July 1, 2003?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9425, "fingerprint": "2002|200200029|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200029|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "5a6c02a4d495dc74", "measure_id": "200200029", "measure_letter": "A-02", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance annually allocating 1998 tobacco litigation settlement monies as follows: funding physicians performing emergency room services (23%), funding health care clinics (20%), funding services for seniors and disabled (19%), funding preventive health grants (15%), funding tobacco prevention/control programs (12%), funding hospitals for emergency charity care and bad debts (6%), and funding Sheriff's public safety programs (5%); and requiring maintenance of other County spending on such categories at 1999-2000 levels, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33738, "no_votes": 20511, "total_votes": 54249, "percent_yes": 62.1910081291821, "percent_no": 37.8089918708179, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.182678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.858116", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance annually allocating 1998 tobacco litigation settlement monies as follows: funding physicians performing emergency room services (23%), funding health care clinics (20%), funding services for seniors and disabled (19%), funding preventive health grants (15%), funding tobacco prevention/control programs (12%), funding hospitals for emergency charity care and bad debts (6%), and funding Sheriff's public safety programs (5%); and requiring maintenance of other County spending on such categories at 1999-2000 levels, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9426, "fingerprint": "2002|200200183|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200183|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "6aa4428afdf66e02", "measure_id": "200200183", "measure_letter": "B-02", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To alleviate overcrowding, related health, safety and educational shortcomings at Cambria Grammar School due to enrollment that exceeds capacity, shall Coast Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of $12,700,000 at legal interest rates to purchase property and construct classrooms, restrooms, a multipurpose room/cafeteria, library/technology center, music/art room and student support services areas? A Citizens' Oversight Committee will monitor and review independent audit of bond expenditures, and give annual reports to the public.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2260, "no_votes": 899, "total_votes": 3159, "percent_yes": 71.54162709718264, "percent_no": 28.45837290281736, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.183007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.858299", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To alleviate overcrowding, related health, safety and educational shortcomings at Cambria Grammar School due to enrollment that exceeds capacity, shall Coast Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of $12,700,000 at legal interest rates to purchase property and construct classrooms, restrooms, a multipurpose room/cafeteria, library/technology center, music/art room and student support services areas? A Citizens' Oversight Committee will monitor and review independent audit of bond expenditures, and give annual reports to the public.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9427, "fingerprint": "2002|200200290|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200290|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "a8aad2959103b336", "measure_id": "200200290", "measure_letter": "J-02", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the initial appropriations limit for the Creston Hills Ranch Community Services District, in accordance with the Article XIII B of the California Constitution, be set at $30,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 24, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.183301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.858484", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the initial appropriations limit for the Creston Hills Ranch Community Services District, in accordance with the Article XIII B of the California Constitution, be set at $30,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9429, "fingerprint": "2002|200200469|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200469|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "8d2daa123a0af821", "measure_id": "200200469", "measure_letter": "K-02", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance amending Section 3-3.03 of the Atascadero Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel/motel bed tax) rate from 9% to 10% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5544, "no_votes": 2737, "total_votes": 8281, "percent_yes": 66.9484361792054, "percent_no": 33.0515638207946, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.183833", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.858849", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance amending Section 3-3.03 of the Atascadero Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel/motel bed tax) rate from 9% to 10% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9431, "fingerprint": "2002|200200471|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200471|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "7026ea10ff29d02f", "measure_id": "200200471", "measure_letter": "L-02", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter Section 901 be amended to allow maintenance related projects to be performed using a unit price contract awarded on a competitive bid basis consistent with the provisions for the unit price contracts contained in Section 20128.5 of the Public Contract Code; and other public works contracts to be awarded consistent with the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section 22000, et seq of the Public Contract Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8419, "no_votes": 2517, "total_votes": 10936, "percent_yes": 76.98427212874908, "percent_no": 23.015727871250917, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.184357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.859207", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter Section 901 be amended to allow maintenance related projects to be performed using a unit price contract awarded on a competitive bid basis consistent with the provisions for the unit price contracts contained in Section 20128.5 of the Public Contract Code; and other public works contracts to be awarded consistent with the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section 22000, et seq of the Public Contract Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9432, "fingerprint": "2002|200200625|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200625|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "70a745ba5a3982dd", "measure_id": "200200625", "measure_letter": "M-02", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Paso Robles Union Elementary School District Area) issue bonds in the amount of $5,900,000 at the lowest available interest rate per annum within the legal limits, to provide adequate classrooms, rehabilitate buildings and playgrounds, and construct library/multi-use buildings, with a citizens' oversight committee to monitor and audit all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5164, "no_votes": 4927, "total_votes": 10091, "percent_yes": 51.17431374492122, "percent_no": 48.82568625507878, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.184650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.859390", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Paso Robles Union Elementary School District Area) issue bonds in the amount of $5,900,000 at the lowest available interest rate per annum within the legal limits, to provide adequate classrooms, rehabilitate buildings and playgrounds, and construct library/multi-use buildings, with a citizens' oversight committee to monitor and audit all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9433, "fingerprint": "2002|200200626|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200626|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "4478d64be24dc86c", "measure_id": "200200626", "measure_letter": "N-02", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue bonds in the amount of $6,700,000, at the lowest availabe interest rate per annum within legal limits, to construct a new P.E. teaching complex, expand the gym, and convert two existing classrooms to science labs, at the high school in Paso Robles with a citizens' oversight committee to monitor and audit all bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5847, "no_votes": 5348, "total_votes": 11195, "percent_yes": 52.22867351496203, "percent_no": 47.77132648503797, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.184944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.859572", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Paso Robles Joint Unified School District issue bonds in the amount of $6,700,000, at the lowest availabe interest rate per annum within legal limits, to construct a new P.E. teaching complex, expand the gym, and convert two existing classrooms to science labs, at the high school in Paso Robles with a citizens' oversight committee to monitor and audit all bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9428, "fingerprint": "2002|200200468|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200468|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "05705b209757eabe", "measure_id": "200200468", "measure_letter": "O-02", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arroyo Grande upgrade and expand the Fire Station located on Traffic Way, including adding sleeping faciliites and a training classroom, expanding the apparatus bay, construction of a federally-required safe medical clean-up area and a system to remove vehicle exhaust from the apparatus room, seismic retrofitting to meet current building safety standards, and installation of fire sprinklers, by issuing $1,900,000 in general obligation bonds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4535, "no_votes": 1726, "total_votes": 6261, "percent_yes": 72.43251876697013, "percent_no": 27.567481233029866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.183568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.858670", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arroyo Grande upgrade and expand the Fire Station located on Traffic Way, including adding sleeping faciliites and a training classroom, expanding the apparatus bay, construction of a federally-required safe medical clean-up area and a system to remove vehicle exhaust from the apparatus room, seismic retrofitting to meet current building safety standards, and installation of fire sprinklers, by issuing $1,900,000 in general obligation bonds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9430, "fingerprint": "2002|200200470|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200470|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "200200470", "measure_letter": "P-02", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2606, "no_votes": 3824, "total_votes": 6430, "percent_yes": 40.52877138413686, "percent_no": 59.47122861586314, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.184096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.859030", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11990, "fingerprint": "2002|200200627|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200627|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d519e78888acf6b1", "measure_id": "200200627", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide competitive salaries to keep experienced, qualified teachers from leaving, prevent library closures, preserve science, music/other programs, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary School District collect $126/ year/ taxable parcel tax for ten years beginning July 1, 2003, with required citizen oversight, exemptions for parcels owned /occupied by persons 65 years or older, and annual cost of living increase capped at 3% to maintain competitive teacher salaries, and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be raised by such amount?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7764, "no_votes": 4146, "total_votes": 11910, "percent_yes": 65.18891687657431, "percent_no": 34.81108312342569, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.059996", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.187997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.861384", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide competitive salaries to keep experienced, qualified teachers from leaving, prevent library closures, preserve science, music/other programs, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary School District collect $126/ year/ taxable parcel tax for ten years beginning July 1, 2003, with required citizen oversight, exemptions for parcels owned /occupied by persons 65 years or older, and annual cost of living increase capped at 3% to maintain competitive teacher salaries, and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be raised by such amount?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9435, "fingerprint": "2002|200200184|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200184|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2e6344e815f80e03", "measure_id": "200200184", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to address its imminent budget shorfalll arising form the State of California's economic crisis, shall the Cabrillo Unified School District levy a special tax of $75 on each parcel within the District for each of three years, exempting vacant parcels and parcels owned by individuals over 65, the proceeds to be used for preserving essential programs and services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3505, "no_votes": 2202, "total_votes": 5707, "percent_yes": 61.41580515156825, "percent_no": 38.58419484843175, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.185503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.859939", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to address its imminent budget shorfalll arising form the State of California's economic crisis, shall the Cabrillo Unified School District levy a special tax of $75 on each parcel within the District for each of three years, exempting vacant parcels and parcels owned by individuals over 65, the proceeds to be used for preserving essential programs and services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11991, "fingerprint": "2002|200200628|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200628|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ddc0b5144302585f", "measure_id": "200200628", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to enable the Hillsborough City School District to continue providing exceptional educational opportunities and modernize its deteriorating facilities, shall the District issue $66.8 million in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to modernize, repair, replace and equip its school facilities to meet safety and instructional needs and create additional space for student class size reduction, additional educational programs and other needs, subject to oversight by an independent citizens' committee as legally required?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2838, "no_votes": 1433, "total_votes": 4271, "percent_yes": 66.448138609225, "percent_no": 33.551861390775, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.060195", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.188364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.861570", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to enable the Hillsborough City School District to continue providing exceptional educational opportunities and modernize its deteriorating facilities, shall the District issue $66.8 million in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to modernize, repair, replace and equip its school facilities to meet safety and instructional needs and create additional space for student class size reduction, additional educational programs and other needs, subject to oversight by an independent citizens' committee as legally required?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9436, "fingerprint": "2002|200200185|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200185|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "211f32bb44739a62", "measure_id": "200200185", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to improve local schools by repairing school roofs, upgrading lighting with energy-saving equipment, providing access to disabled students, purchasing computers, improving fields to increase safety, and other building and equipment improvements as specified in the District's Bond Project List, shall the Redwood City Elementary School District issue $22,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates subject to specified accountability measures, including a Citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures and review financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8946, "no_votes": 4828, "total_votes": 13774, "percent_yes": 64.94845360824742, "percent_no": 35.05154639175258, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.185782", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.860121", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to improve local schools by repairing school roofs, upgrading lighting with energy-saving equipment, providing access to disabled students, purchasing computers, improving fields to increase safety, and other building and equipment improvements as specified in the District's Bond Project List, shall the Redwood City Elementary School District issue $22,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates subject to specified accountability measures, including a Citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures and review financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11992, "fingerprint": "2002|200200629|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200629|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4c17f4100a044c79", "measure_id": "200200629", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without authorizing any additional bonds or taxes, shall school bond Measure D passed by voters of San Mateo Union High School District on November 7, 2000, be amended so that those bond funds may be used for demolition and construction projects, including the removal or replacement of outmoded or unsafe buildings and construction of new seismically safe facilities and classrooms at the District's six comprehensive high schools, and for any necessary site preparation, site improvements, easements or rights of way?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40674, "no_votes": 14899, "total_votes": 55573, "percent_yes": 73.19021827146275, "percent_no": 26.809781728537246, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.060394", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.188646", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.861753", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without authorizing any additional bonds or taxes, shall school bond Measure D passed by voters of San Mateo Union High School District on November 7, 2000, be amended so that those bond funds may be used for demolition and construction projects, including the removal or replacement of outmoded or unsafe buildings and construction of new seismically safe facilities and classrooms at the District's six comprehensive high schools, and for any necessary site preparation, site improvements, easements or rights of way?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9434, "fingerprint": "2002|200200098|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200098|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c46f97510dbd03fc", "measure_id": "200200098", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted: (1) rezoning 10.5 acres in the Gateway/101 Redevelopment Area to 'General Commercial' to allow a regional retail use such as an IKEA store; and (2) amending the Gateway/101 Specific Plan to allow increases in square footage, floor area, height, building design flexibility, and multi-level parking, to allow for a regional retail use such as and IKEA store?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1562, "no_votes": 1419, "total_votes": 2981, "percent_yes": 52.398523985239855, "percent_no": 47.601476014760145, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.185208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.859752", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted: (1) rezoning 10.5 acres in the Gateway/101 Redevelopment Area to 'General Commercial' to allow a regional retail use such as an IKEA store; and (2) amending the Gateway/101 Specific Plan to allow increases in square footage, floor area, height, building design flexibility, and multi-level parking, to allow for a regional retail use such as and IKEA store?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9440, "fingerprint": "2002|200200475|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200475|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "57c88274dc5f8363", "measure_id": "200200475", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. C-02 be adopted to validate the existing ceiling of $500 per year on the utility users tax payable by businesses in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7045, "no_votes": 3594, "total_votes": 10639, "percent_yes": 66.21862957044836, "percent_no": 33.78137042955164, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.187136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.860842", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. C-02 be adopted to validate the existing ceiling of $500 per year on the utility users tax payable by businesses in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9441, "fingerprint": "2002|200200476|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200476|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c08c122b927e273a", "measure_id": "200200476", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council, following all land use approvals and environmental review, adopt an ordinance satisfying the requirements of Ordinance No. 391-C.S., which requires a public vote, to allow the development of up to 315 residential units on the Quarry site (APN #018-150-050 and 018-150-070) as part of a mixed-use development project that includes permanent open space, improved coastal assess, a hotel/conference center, retail, restaurant, residential and civic uses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4289, "no_votes": 8047, "total_votes": 12336, "percent_yes": 34.76815823605707, "percent_no": 65.23184176394292, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.187444", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.861024", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council, following all land use approvals and environmental review, adopt an ordinance satisfying the requirements of Ordinance No. 391-C.S., which requires a public vote, to allow the development of up to 315 residential units on the Quarry site (APN #018-150-050 and 018-150-070) as part of a mixed-use development project that includes permanent open space, improved coastal assess, a hotel/conference center, retail, restaurant, residential and civic uses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9442, "fingerprint": "2002|200200477|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200477|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "10cb525062527ba5", "measure_id": "200200477", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a revised Charter be enacted for the City of San Mateo?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13310, "no_votes": 5834, "total_votes": 19144, "percent_yes": 69.52569995821145, "percent_no": 30.474300041788553, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.187724", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.861203", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a revised Charter be enacted for the City of San Mateo?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9437, "fingerprint": "2002|200200472|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200472|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0668eb16d5561e7b", "measure_id": "200200472", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of East Palo Alto continue collecting until November 30, 2006, a utility users tax for general governmental purposes, including police and public safety, parks and recreation, street improvements, youth and senior citizens services; and impose said tax on cellular telephones and similar communications technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1499, "no_votes": 1473, "total_votes": 2972, "percent_yes": 50.43741588156124, "percent_no": 49.56258411843876, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.186075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.860302", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of East Palo Alto continue collecting until November 30, 2006, a utility users tax for general governmental purposes, including police and public safety, parks and recreation, street improvements, youth and senior citizens services; and impose said tax on cellular telephones and similar communications technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9438, "fingerprint": "2002|200200473|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200473|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "4d06a6e39ad3d46c", "measure_id": "200200473", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the East Palo Alto Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax ordinance, the revenue from which goes into the City's General Fund for general governmental purposes, be amended to require that 10% of hotel tax revenue annually be used exclusively for children, youth and family services, including senior citizen services, in the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1981, "no_votes": 969, "total_votes": 2950, "percent_yes": 67.15254237288136, "percent_no": 32.847457627118644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.186370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.860481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the East Palo Alto Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax ordinance, the revenue from which goes into the City's General Fund for general governmental purposes, be amended to require that 10% of hotel tax revenue annually be used exclusively for children, youth and family services, including senior citizen services, in the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9439, "fingerprint": "2002|200200474|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200474|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c24bf3a7d77d0aa7", "measure_id": "200200474", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the East Palo Alto transient occupancy (hotel) tax ordinance, the revenue from which goes into the City's General Fund for general governmental purposes, be amended to require that 10% of hotel tax revenue annually be used exclusively for affordable housing purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1697, "no_votes": 1222, "total_votes": 2919, "percent_yes": 58.13634806440562, "percent_no": 41.86365193559438, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.186636", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.860662", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the East Palo Alto transient occupancy (hotel) tax ordinance, the revenue from which goes into the City's General Fund for general governmental purposes, be amended to require that 10% of hotel tax revenue annually be used exclusively for affordable housing purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9443, "fingerprint": "2002|200200099|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200099|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "b5799d9744c866fb", "measure_id": "200200099", "measure_letter": "J2002", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "ENACTMENT OF ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE CITY EMPLOYEES TO RESIDE WITHIN CITY DURING CITY EMPLOYMENT. Shall the City of Guadalupe adopt an ordinance requiring that the following city employees reside within the City and be electors of the City: City Administrator, Chief of the Police Department and Chief of the Fire Department; and require that employees comply with the requirement within 180 days of enactment of this ordinance, or within 180 days of executing an employment contract with the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82, "no_votes": 46, "total_votes": 128, "percent_yes": 64.0625, "percent_no": 35.9375, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.188974", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.861934", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ENACTMENT OF ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE CITY EMPLOYEES TO RESIDE WITHIN CITY DURING CITY EMPLOYMENT. Shall the City of Guadalupe adopt an ordinance requiring that the following city employees reside within the City and be electors of the City: City Administrator, Chief of the Police Department and Chief of the Fire Department; and require that employees comply with the requirement within 180 days of enactment of this ordinance, or within 180 days of executing an employment contract with the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9445, "fingerprint": "2002|200200478|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200478|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "77e9bd3af19f7b78", "measure_id": "200200478", "measure_letter": "L2002", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should an ordinance approving the Tivoli Garden Wheel Specific Plan and establishing the Tivoli Wheel/TRC Tourist Commerical District be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 859, "no_votes": 1317, "total_votes": 2176, "percent_yes": 39.47610294117647, "percent_no": 60.52389705882353, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.189572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.862307", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should an ordinance approving the Tivoli Garden Wheel Specific Plan and establishing the Tivoli Wheel/TRC Tourist Commerical District be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9446, "fingerprint": "2002|200200630|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200630|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "66efbb42b22269eb", "measure_id": "200200630", "measure_letter": "N2002", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions by repairing, renovating, and equipping Lompoc schools, including student restrooms, repairing/replacing inadequate/unsafe electrical, heating sytems, leaking roofs, windows, plumbing/sewer systems, deteriorating buildings, temporary classrooms, eliminating asbestos, mold and mildew, upgrading for fire and earthquake safety, constructing and acquiring classrooms, and to qualify for State matching funds, shall Lompoc Unified School District issue $38,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with bond expenditures subject to independent citizen's oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9049, "no_votes": 3944, "total_votes": 12993, "percent_yes": 69.64519356576618, "percent_no": 30.354806434233822, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.189843", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.862486", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions by repairing, renovating, and equipping Lompoc schools, including student restrooms, repairing/replacing inadequate/unsafe electrical, heating sytems, leaking roofs, windows, plumbing/sewer systems, deteriorating buildings, temporary classrooms, eliminating asbestos, mold and mildew, upgrading for fire and earthquake safety, constructing and acquiring classrooms, and to qualify for State matching funds, shall Lompoc Unified School District issue $38,000,000 of bonds, at legal rates, with bond expenditures subject to independent citizen's oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9447, "fingerprint": "2002|200200631|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200631|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "e363d29e590785a4", "measure_id": "200200631", "measure_letter": "O2002", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve our schools, maintain small class sizes, retain and attract quality teachers and other presonnel through competitive salaries, support campus safety, improve school maitenance, and enhance programs including science, music, libraries, counseling, special education, and athletics, shall Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District levy a tax of $80 per parcel for five years so long as a senior citizen (65 and over) exemption is provided, with guaranteed annual financial audits, and a citizen's oversight committee is established?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4209, "no_votes": 4073, "total_votes": 8282, "percent_yes": 50.82105771552765, "percent_no": 49.17894228447235, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.190163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.862673", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve our schools, maintain small class sizes, retain and attract quality teachers and other presonnel through competitive salaries, support campus safety, improve school maitenance, and enhance programs including science, music, libraries, counseling, special education, and athletics, shall Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District levy a tax of $80 per parcel for five years so long as a senior citizen (65 and over) exemption is provided, with guaranteed annual financial audits, and a citizen's oversight committee is established?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9444, "fingerprint": "2002|200200291|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200291|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d8d76d45d9575953", "measure_id": "200200291", "measure_letter": "P2002", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Gail Marshall be recalled (removed) from the office of 3rd District Supervisor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11370, "no_votes": 13546, "total_votes": 24916, "percent_yes": 45.63332798201958, "percent_no": 54.36667201798042, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.189303", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.862119", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Gail Marshall be recalled (removed) from the office of 3rd District Supervisor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9462, "fingerprint": "2002|200200221|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200221|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c900d011f84c9043", "measure_id": "200200221", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Altos School District be authorized to adjust its existing special tax and the Gann Appropriations Limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5318, "no_votes": 2897, "total_votes": 8215, "percent_yes": 64.73524041387705, "percent_no": 35.26475958612295, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-04-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.194819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.867279", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Altos School District be authorized to adjust its existing special tax and the Gann Appropriations Limit by the amount of revenue generated by that special tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11994, "fingerprint": "2002|200200222|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200222|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1c11955d8ae5c787", "measure_id": "200200222", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to avoid increases in class size, avoid reductions in science, literacy, art, music and other academic programs, continue to provide student support services and to assure a continuation of quality education, shall the Los Gatos Union School District provide funds for continuance of programs by levying a special tax of $290 per parcel for a period of six years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3226, "no_votes": 1067, "total_votes": 4293, "percent_yes": 75.14558583740974, "percent_no": 24.85441416259026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-04-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.065009", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.195097", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.867462", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to avoid increases in class size, avoid reductions in science, literacy, art, music and other academic programs, continue to provide student support services and to assure a continuation of quality education, shall the Los Gatos Union School District provide funds for continuance of programs by levying a special tax of $290 per parcel for a period of six years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9459, "fingerprint": "2002|200200194|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200194|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ef287efef81eaaae", "measure_id": "200200194", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the transfer of territory from Santa Clara Unified School District to East Side Union and Orchard School Districts.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 5, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.193980", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.866726", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the transfer of territory from Santa Clara Unified School District to East Side Union and Orchard School Districts.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11995, "fingerprint": "2002|200200479|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200479|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9cb423b846b3430b", "measure_id": "200200479", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 1580, New Series, be adopted to authorize the City to continue to impose the Transient Occupancy Tax at the current rate of 10% of the room rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4912, "no_votes": 1759, "total_votes": 6671, "percent_yes": 73.63213910957877, "percent_no": 26.367860890421227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.065262", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.195383", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.867646", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 1580, New Series, be adopted to authorize the City to continue to impose the Transient Occupancy Tax at the current rate of 10% of the room rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9454, "fingerprint": "2002|200200188|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200188|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "18454e1ee0fda538", "measure_id": "200200188", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Gilroy Unified School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4074, "no_votes": 2060, "total_votes": 6134, "percent_yes": 66.41669383762635, "percent_no": 33.583306162373646, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.192199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.864384", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Gilroy Unified School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11996, "fingerprint": "2002|200200480|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200480|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "84437445f824633d", "measure_id": "200200480", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "to improve library and community services for children by expanding Children's Library to provide needed space and safety repairs; rebuilding and expanding the Mitchell Park Library and Community Center for all community users; and, to meet current health and safety codes by making plumbing, heating, ventilation, and lighting system upgrades to 50-year-old systems in all three facilities, shall the City of Palo Alto issue $49.1 million in bonds, subject to independent citizen oversight and annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12573, "no_votes": 7867, "total_votes": 20440, "percent_yes": 61.51174168297457, "percent_no": 38.48825831702543, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.065504", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.195649", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.867830", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "to improve library and community services for children by expanding Children's Library to provide needed space and safety repairs; rebuilding and expanding the Mitchell Park Library and Community Center for all community users; and, to meet current health and safety codes by making plumbing, heating, ventilation, and lighting system upgrades to 50-year-old systems in all three facilities, shall the City of Palo Alto issue $49.1 million in bonds, subject to independent citizen oversight and annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9455, "fingerprint": "2002|200200189|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200189|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cf14398cef694527", "measure_id": "200200189", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade, renovate, and rehabilitate all schools to District standards, and construct needed classrooms to accommodate growing enrollment, shall the Gilroy Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $69 million of bonds to finance the specific school facilities projects listed in the District's Bond Project List, and in order to qualify to receive State grant matching funds, subject to a Citizens' Oversight Committee and all the accountability requirements specified in the measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3720, "no_votes": 3308, "total_votes": 7028, "percent_yes": 52.93113261240752, "percent_no": 47.06886738759248, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.192501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.865481", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade, renovate, and rehabilitate all schools to District standards, and construct needed classrooms to accommodate growing enrollment, shall the Gilroy Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $69 million of bonds to finance the specific school facilities projects listed in the District's Bond Project List, and in order to qualify to receive State grant matching funds, subject to a Citizens' Oversight Committee and all the accountability requirements specified in the measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11997, "fingerprint": "2002|200200481|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200481|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "87fb4ccaefaa6139", "measure_id": "200200481", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To reduce classroom shortage, shall the City of San Jose be authorized to lease a portion of Ramblewood Park to Franklin-McKinley School District for any legally allowing term, but not less than 40 years, to allow construction of a new school on 0.56 acres, accommodating approximately 450 students, and to allow the District to use the park for school-related recreational uses, if the District's study identifies Ramblewood Park as the most feasible site?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 87495, "no_votes": 51586, "total_votes": 139081, "percent_yes": 62.90938374041026, "percent_no": 37.09061625958974, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.065709", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.195917", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.868013", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce classroom shortage, shall the City of San Jose be authorized to lease a portion of Ramblewood Park to Franklin-McKinley School District for any legally allowing term, but not less than 40 years, to allow construction of a new school on 0.56 acres, accommodating approximately 450 students, and to allow the District to use the park for school-related recreational uses, if the District's study identifies Ramblewood Park as the most feasible site?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9461, "fingerprint": "2002|200200196|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200196|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "02b3c841c45649d1", "measure_id": "200200196", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities for local residents, shall the West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $268,653,300 in bonds at legal interest rates to construct, acquire, repair and equip classrooms, libraries, science/computer labs, facilities/sites, upgrade technology, improve safety conditions and accessibility for the disabled, upgrade fire, earthquake safety conditions and accessibility for the disabled, upgrade fire, earthquake safety, lighting, electrical, energy conservation, ventilation/plumbing systems, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30824, "no_votes": 30327, "total_votes": 61151, "percent_yes": 50.406371114127325, "percent_no": 49.593628885872675, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.194549", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.867094", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities for local residents, shall the West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $268,653,300 in bonds at legal interest rates to construct, acquire, repair and equip classrooms, libraries, science/computer labs, facilities/sites, upgrade technology, improve safety conditions and accessibility for the disabled, upgrade fire, earthquake safety conditions and accessibility for the disabled, upgrade fire, earthquake safety, lighting, electrical, energy conservation, ventilation/plumbing systems, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11998, "fingerprint": "2002|200200482|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200482|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e7ba79f6f408ee99", "measure_id": "200200482", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide the ability to create jobs, attract business and serve as a citywide emergency disaster shelter by improving safety, security and future expansion of the San Jose Convention Center, shall the City be authorized to increase the transient occupancy tax (hotel levy), by 4%, paid only by hotel guests and visitors, with no increase in local property taxes, a citizens oversight committee, and guaranteed annual financial audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 94944, "no_votes": 51081, "total_votes": 146025, "percent_yes": 65.01900359527478, "percent_no": 34.98099640472522, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.065910", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.196190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.868205", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide the ability to create jobs, attract business and serve as a citywide emergency disaster shelter by improving safety, security and future expansion of the San Jose Convention Center, shall the City be authorized to increase the transient occupancy tax (hotel levy), by 4%, paid only by hotel guests and visitors, with no increase in local property taxes, a citizens oversight committee, and guaranteed annual financial audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9458, "fingerprint": "2002|200200193|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200193|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "96ed68451b7637b9", "measure_id": "200200193", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete the repair and rehabilitation of local schools, including health and safety repairs, and qualify for State matching funds, shall the San Jose Unified School District, with annual audits and citizens oversight, upgrade inadequate plumbing, electrical, heating and ventilation systems, replace portable classrooms, renovate children's restrooms, repair deteriorating roofs, remove asbestos, remove school sites by issuing $429 million of bonds within legal interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23248, "no_votes": 10301, "total_votes": 33549, "percent_yes": 69.29565709857224, "percent_no": 30.704342901427765, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.193682", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.866542", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete the repair and rehabilitation of local schools, including health and safety repairs, and qualify for State matching funds, shall the San Jose Unified School District, with annual audits and citizens oversight, upgrade inadequate plumbing, electrical, heating and ventilation systems, replace portable classrooms, renovate children's restrooms, repair deteriorating roofs, remove asbestos, remove school sites by issuing $429 million of bonds within legal interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11999, "fingerprint": "2002|200200632|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200632|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6a2fc104412087d9", "measure_id": "200200632", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Cambrian Elementary School District repair 40-year old local schools, improve student safety conditions, upgrade wiring for technology and safety standards, install energy efficient heating/cooling systems, replace aging plumbing, fix leaky roofs/bathrooms, repair, construct, acquire, equip libraries, classrooms, and current sites, qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $20,975,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5352, "no_votes": 1902, "total_votes": 7254, "percent_yes": 73.7799834574028, "percent_no": 26.220016542597193, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.066108", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.196456", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.868387", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Cambrian Elementary School District repair 40-year old local schools, improve student safety conditions, upgrade wiring for technology and safety standards, install energy efficient heating/cooling systems, replace aging plumbing, fix leaky roofs/bathrooms, repair, construct, acquire, equip libraries, classrooms, and current sites, qualify for State matching funds, by issuing $20,975,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee and perform audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9453, "fingerprint": "2002|200200187|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200187|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b605318d982a5f93", "measure_id": "200200187", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide greater security and safety, relieve overcrowding, and improve technology at the following schools: Andrew Hill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Piedmont Hills, Oak Grove, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Overfelt, Yerba Buena, Foothill Alternative Schools, and the Adult Education Centers, shall the East Side Union High School District issue $298 million of bonds within legal interest rate limits to repair, build, and equip its facilities provided the spending of such funds is reviewed by an independent citizen oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33345, "no_votes": 14342, "total_votes": 47687, "percent_yes": 69.92471742822993, "percent_no": 30.075282571770074, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.191901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.863974", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide greater security and safety, relieve overcrowding, and improve technology at the following schools: Andrew Hill, Independence, James Lick, Mt. Pleasant, Piedmont Hills, Oak Grove, Santa Teresa, Silver Creek, Overfelt, Yerba Buena, Foothill Alternative Schools, and the Adult Education Centers, shall the East Side Union High School District issue $298 million of bonds within legal interest rate limits to repair, build, and equip its facilities provided the spending of such funds is reviewed by an independent citizen oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12001, "fingerprint": "2002|200200635|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200635|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "dc79039537f9f168", "measure_id": "200200635", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To hire, train, retain teachers, provide competitive teacher salaries, fund school libraries, purchase textbooks, preserve science classes/modern labs, maintain neighborhood schools and small class size, protect junior high electives like music, foreign language, computer classes, and balance the educational program, shall Los Altos School District increase its existing parcel tax and annual appropriations limit by $333/parcel beginning July 1, 2003, with independent citizens' oversight of expenditures and exemptions for parcels owned/occupied by persons 65 years/older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11459, "no_votes": 4745, "total_votes": 16204, "percent_yes": 70.71710688718835, "percent_no": 29.28289311281165, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.066711", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.197304", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.868943", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To hire, train, retain teachers, provide competitive teacher salaries, fund school libraries, purchase textbooks, preserve science classes/modern labs, maintain neighborhood schools and small class size, protect junior high electives like music, foreign language, computer classes, and balance the educational program, shall Los Altos School District increase its existing parcel tax and annual appropriations limit by $333/parcel beginning July 1, 2003, with independent citizens' oversight of expenditures and exemptions for parcels owned/occupied by persons 65 years/older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 11993, "fingerprint": "2002|200200192|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200192|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "96a41eea88a42af3", "measure_id": "200200192", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 1991 be continued for four years thus allowing the district to continue to expend the funds generated by the existing special tax of $68 per parcel for expenditures for remedial services, repair of school buildings and grounds, purchase of instructional supplies and equipment, installation of energy conservation equipment, and restoration of services reduced prior years in the library, counseling, custodial and maintenance areas?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8489, "no_votes": 3696, "total_votes": 12185, "percent_yes": 69.66762412802626, "percent_no": 30.33237587197374, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.063798", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.193371", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.866354", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 1991 be continued for four years thus allowing the district to continue to expend the funds generated by the existing special tax of $68 per parcel for expenditures for remedial services, repair of school buildings and grounds, purchase of instructional supplies and equipment, installation of energy conservation equipment, and restoration of services reduced prior years in the library, counseling, custodial and maintenance areas?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9452, "fingerprint": "2002|200200186|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200186|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4d46cdd9e0367a87", "measure_id": "200200186", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete the repair, renovation, modernization and construction of neighborhood elementary and middle schools; upgrade aged electrical systems, bathrooms and plumbing; improve parking and traffic around elementary and middle schools; enhance libraries and technology capabilities; and improve accessibility for the disabled shall the Campbell Union School District issue bonds of $74,900,000 at interest rates within legal limits, with citizen's oversight and annual financial audits with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8772, "no_votes": 4384, "total_votes": 13156, "percent_yes": 66.67680145941016, "percent_no": 33.32319854058984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.191632", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.863583", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete the repair, renovation, modernization and construction of neighborhood elementary and middle schools; upgrade aged electrical systems, bathrooms and plumbing; improve parking and traffic around elementary and middle schools; enhance libraries and technology capabilities; and improve accessibility for the disabled shall the Campbell Union School District issue bonds of $74,900,000 at interest rates within legal limits, with citizen's oversight and annual financial audits with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9463, "fingerprint": "2002|200200634|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200634|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ce1f3c77a4763042", "measure_id": "200200634", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make schools safe, relieve overcrowding, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Gilroy Unified School District repair and renovate local schools, including: upgrade deteriorated plumbing and bathrooms; repair aging roofs; install energy efficient heating/cooling; replace portables with permanent classrooms; increase electrical capacity; construct, acquire, and improve classrooms and schools, including Phase 1 of a new high school; by issuing $69,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and no money for staff salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5865, "no_votes": 3484, "total_votes": 9349, "percent_yes": 62.73398224409028, "percent_no": 37.26601775590972, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.197034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.868760", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make schools safe, relieve overcrowding, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Gilroy Unified School District repair and renovate local schools, including: upgrade deteriorated plumbing and bathrooms; repair aging roofs; install energy efficient heating/cooling; replace portables with permanent classrooms; increase electrical capacity; construct, acquire, and improve classrooms and schools, including Phase 1 of a new high school; by issuing $69,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and no money for staff salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12000, "fingerprint": "2002|200200633|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200633|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b3761a4b1a21be70", "measure_id": "200200633", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To train faculty and students to use modern technology, to retain and attract quality teachers and counselors, and to increase student safety, shall East Side Union High School District levy an annual tax of $49.75 per parcel ($4.15 per month) for six years so long as a senior citizen (65 and older) exemption is provided, no money is used for administrative salaries, and a citizens' oversight committee is established?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39824, "no_votes": 27736, "total_votes": 67560, "percent_yes": 58.94612196566016, "percent_no": 41.05387803433984, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.066314", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.196756", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.868575", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To train faculty and students to use modern technology, to retain and attract quality teachers and counselors, and to increase student safety, shall East Side Union High School District levy an annual tax of $49.75 per parcel ($4.15 per month) for six years so long as a senior citizen (65 and older) exemption is provided, no money is used for administrative salaries, and a citizens' oversight committee is established?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9457, "fingerprint": "2002|200200191|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200191|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1abd485a19782b88", "measure_id": "200200191", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Moreland School District be authorized to finance the completion of repair, renovation and upgrading of the remaining unmodernized elementary schools, including safety upgrades to reduce danger from earthquakes, repair of leaky roofs, upgrades to inadequate and unsafe electrical, heating and plumbing systems, the construction of additional educational facilities, and additional upgrades of remaining schools, including energy efficient systems, by issuing bonds in the maximum principal amount of $35,000,000, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5597, "no_votes": 2125, "total_votes": 7722, "percent_yes": 72.48122248122249, "percent_no": 27.51877751877751, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.193046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.866101", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Moreland School District be authorized to finance the completion of repair, renovation and upgrading of the remaining unmodernized elementary schools, including safety upgrades to reduce danger from earthquakes, repair of leaky roofs, upgrades to inadequate and unsafe electrical, heating and plumbing systems, the construction of additional educational facilities, and additional upgrades of remaining schools, including energy efficient systems, by issuing bonds in the maximum principal amount of $35,000,000, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9456, "fingerprint": "2002|200200190|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200190|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5f1f7777b78e24c6", "measure_id": "200200190", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL SAFETY AND REPAIR MEASURE. To replace earthquake damaged classrooms at C.T. English Middle School; provide drinkable water; construct, repair, acquire, furnish computer/science labs, libraries, school facilities/sites; repair roofs, floors, and water systems; qualify for State matching funds, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District issue $4,965,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 209, "no_votes": 98, "total_votes": 307, "percent_yes": 68.07817589576547, "percent_no": 31.92182410423453, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.192774", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.865851", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL SAFETY AND REPAIR MEASURE. To replace earthquake damaged classrooms at C.T. English Middle School; provide drinkable water; construct, repair, acquire, furnish computer/science labs, libraries, school facilities/sites; repair roofs, floors, and water systems; qualify for State matching funds, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District issue $4,965,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9460, "fingerprint": "2002|200200195|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200195|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d61fd4d09f9ca26c", "measure_id": "200200195", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate redwood Middle school; repair older school classrooms and buildings; construct, renovate, equip school facilities and sites,  including adding classrooms; upgrade school roofs, ventilation/heating systems, and student drop-off areas, shall Saratoga Union School District issue $19,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for administrators' salaries or other operating expenses, while projecting to maintain the 1997 tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3903, "no_votes": 2188, "total_votes": 6091, "percent_yes": 64.07814808734199, "percent_no": 35.92185191265801, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.194279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.866910", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate redwood Middle school; repair older school classrooms and buildings; construct, renovate, equip school facilities and sites,  including adding classrooms; upgrade school roofs, ventilation/heating systems, and student drop-off areas, shall Saratoga Union School District issue $19,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for administrators' salaries or other operating expenses, while projecting to maintain the 1997 tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9448, "fingerprint": "2002|200200100|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200100|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c6e37e357c74d190", "measure_id": "200200100", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Utility Tax Initiative. Residents currently pay a 2.4% tax on utility use, specifically electric, gas and telephone. Shall the City of Cupertino extend the existing utility tax which will otherwise terminate in 2015 for an additional 15 years to 2030, for general city services and programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4935, "no_votes": 3215, "total_votes": 8150, "percent_yes": 60.5521472392638, "percent_no": 39.4478527607362, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.190432", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.862855", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Utility Tax Initiative. Residents currently pay a 2.4% tax on utility use, specifically electric, gas and telephone. Shall the City of Cupertino extend the existing utility tax which will otherwise terminate in 2015 for an additional 15 years to 2030, for general city services and programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9449, "fingerprint": "2002|200200101|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200101|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "d748b120e5d8ba40", "measure_id": "200200101", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the Americana Precise Plan be adopted to allow a large-scale regional home products retail store in excess of 50,000 square feet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4828, "no_votes": 8847, "total_votes": 13675, "percent_yes": 35.30530164533821, "percent_no": 64.6946983546618, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.190792", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.863037", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the Americana Precise Plan be adopted to allow a large-scale regional home products retail store in excess of 50,000 square feet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9450, "fingerprint": "2002|200200102|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200102|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "decc7de81d761c86", "measure_id": "200200102", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "SAN JOSE 911, FIRE, POLICE, PARAMEDIC, AND NEIGHBORHOOD SECURITY ACT. To improve San Jose's fire, police, and paramedic response time by: adding and improving fire stations and police stations, training facilities, and creating state of the art 911 communications facilities, shall the City issue $159,000,000 in bonds, at the best rates possible, with the moneys deposited in a special account only for these purposes and with annual expenditure reporting to a citizens watchdog committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 75185, "no_votes": 29722, "total_votes": 104907, "percent_yes": 71.6682394883087, "percent_no": 28.3317605116913, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.191095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.863221", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN JOSE 911, FIRE, POLICE, PARAMEDIC, AND NEIGHBORHOOD SECURITY ACT. To improve San Jose's fire, police, and paramedic response time by: adding and improving fire stations and police stations, training facilities, and creating state of the art 911 communications facilities, shall the City issue $159,000,000 in bonds, at the best rates possible, with the moneys deposited in a special account only for these purposes and with annual expenditure reporting to a citizens watchdog committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9451, "fingerprint": "2002|200200103|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200103|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "daed5b1e719b40cb", "measure_id": "200200103", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "ANNEXATION-BUENA VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD. To allow annexation of  Buena Vista Neighborhood from County of Santa Clara into City of San Jose, shall residential properties in that neighborhood be relieved of certain County fees/taxes and become subject to existing and proposed City taxes/fees: Sanitary Sewer: $227/year, Storm Sewer: $40.68/year, Utility Tax: 5% of bill, Library Assessment: $25/year, Business tax: $150/year, Garbage Fees: $14.95-$59.80/month, Existing and Proposed General Obligation Bonds: $63.50/$100,000 Assessed value (estimate)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40, "no_votes": 22, "total_votes": 62, "percent_yes": 64.51612903225806, "percent_no": 35.483870967741936, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.191365", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.863402", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ANNEXATION-BUENA VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD. To allow annexation of  Buena Vista Neighborhood from County of Santa Clara into City of San Jose, shall residential properties in that neighborhood be relieved of certain County fees/taxes and become subject to existing and proposed City taxes/fees: Sanitary Sewer: $227/year, Storm Sewer: $40.68/year, Utility Tax: 5% of bill, Library Assessment: $25/year, Business tax: $150/year, Garbage Fees: $14.95-$59.80/month, Existing and Proposed General Obligation Bonds: $63.50/$100,000 Assessed value (estimate)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9471, "fingerprint": "2002|200200202|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200202|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a1786510b08e2a5c", "measure_id": "200200202", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Soquel Union Elementary School district repair and renovate all five existing schools at their current locations (not including Jade Street Park): eliminate safety hazards and make health/safety improvements; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; upgrade inadequate heating/ventilation systems; replace deteriorated facilities; modernize and construct classrooms, libraries, computer stations, restrooms, and facilities to improve inadequate conditions and overcrowding; provide handicapped access, by issuing $15 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5118, "no_votes": 2027, "total_votes": 7145, "percent_yes": 71.63051084674598, "percent_no": 28.369489153254023, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.199689", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.870414", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Soquel Union Elementary School district repair and renovate all five existing schools at their current locations (not including Jade Street Park): eliminate safety hazards and make health/safety improvements; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; upgrade inadequate heating/ventilation systems; replace deteriorated facilities; modernize and construct classrooms, libraries, computer stations, restrooms, and facilities to improve inadequate conditions and overcrowding; provide handicapped access, by issuing $15 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9470, "fingerprint": "2002|200200201|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200201|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "4f7f6fbb56da8da5", "measure_id": "200200201", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new Scotts Valley Middle School on the current site, multipurpose rooms at Vine Hill and Brook Knoll Schools, and a library at Scotts Valley high School, Replace portables at Vine Hill and Brook Knoll with new classrooms and, if moneys are available, make other improvements to school buildings approved by a citizens' oversight committee and the District Board, shall the Scotts Valley Unified School District issue $44.2 million of bonds, at interest rates within legal limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3716, "no_votes": 1936, "total_votes": 5652, "percent_yes": 65.74663835810333, "percent_no": 34.253361641896674, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.199388", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.870232", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new Scotts Valley Middle School on the current site, multipurpose rooms at Vine Hill and Brook Knoll Schools, and a library at Scotts Valley high School, Replace portables at Vine Hill and Brook Knoll with new classrooms and, if moneys are available, make other improvements to school buildings approved by a citizens' oversight committee and the District Board, shall the Scotts Valley Unified School District issue $44.2 million of bonds, at interest rates within legal limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9469, "fingerprint": "2002|200200200|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200200|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "aaf126706edef4b0", "measure_id": "200200200", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Santa Cruz City High School District provide funds to continue specific educational programs and services by levying a special assessment for a period of 4 years, beginning 7/1/02, at the rate of $28 per year for each assessor's parcel within the Santa Cruz City High School District, with an exemption for any senior citizen, 65 years or older, who owns and occupies that parcel as his or her principal place of residence, and shall the Santa Cruz City High School District implement accountability measures required by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19625, "no_votes": 9411, "total_votes": 29036, "percent_yes": 67.58851081416172, "percent_no": 32.41148918583828, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.199093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.870046", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Cruz City High School District provide funds to continue specific educational programs and services by levying a special assessment for a period of 4 years, beginning 7/1/02, at the rate of $28 per year for each assessor's parcel within the Santa Cruz City High School District, with an exemption for any senior citizen, 65 years or older, who owns and occupies that parcel as his or her principal place of residence, and shall the Santa Cruz City High School District implement accountability measures required by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9468, "fingerprint": "2002|200200199|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200199|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "2fb3c3762adf0391", "measure_id": "200200199", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Santa Cruz Elementary School District provide funds to continue specific educational programs and services by levying a special assessment for a period of 4 years, beginning 7/1/02, at the rate of $70 per year for each assessor's parcel within the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District, with an exemption for any senior citizen, 65 years or older, who owns and occupies that parcel as his or her principal place of residence, and shall the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District implement accountability measures required by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10882, "no_votes": 4457, "total_votes": 15339, "percent_yes": 70.94334702392594, "percent_no": 29.056652976074062, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.198829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.869864", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Cruz Elementary School District provide funds to continue specific educational programs and services by levying a special assessment for a period of 4 years, beginning 7/1/02, at the rate of $70 per year for each assessor's parcel within the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District, with an exemption for any senior citizen, 65 years or older, who owns and occupies that parcel as his or her principal place of residence, and shall the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District implement accountability measures required by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9472, "fingerprint": "2002|200200203|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200203|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "e3e31b488cb82f75", "measure_id": "200200203", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities for local residents, shall West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $268,653,300 in bonds at legal interest rates to construct, acquire, repair and equip classrooms, libraries, science/computer, facilities/sites, upgrade technology, improve safety conditions and accessibility for the disable, upgrade fire, earthquake safety, lighting, electrical, energy conservation, ventilation/plumbing systems, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 717, "no_votes": 697, "total_votes": 1414, "percent_yes": 50.70721357850071, "percent_no": 49.29278642149929, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.199957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.870599", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities for local residents, shall West Valley-Mission Community College District issue $268,653,300 in bonds at legal interest rates to construct, acquire, repair and equip classrooms, libraries, science/computer, facilities/sites, upgrade technology, improve safety conditions and accessibility for the disable, upgrade fire, earthquake safety, lighting, electrical, energy conservation, ventilation/plumbing systems, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9482, "fingerprint": "2002|200200636|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200636|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "0962b6a725b9eca9", "measure_id": "200200636", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Aptos High School by constructing, upgrading, equipping a performing arts center, classrooms, cafeteria, athletic facilities, parking/traffic safety improvements; to construct, improve, equip Watsonville Area Schools, including libraries, athletic facilities, cafeterias, classroom spaces, parking, high school facilities, shall Pajaro Valley Unified School District issue $58,250,000 of bonds ($24,036,000 for Aptos High School/$34,214,000 for Watsonville area schools) at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13537, "no_votes": 6690, "total_votes": 20227, "percent_yes": 66.92539674692243, "percent_no": 33.07460325307757, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.203320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.872755", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Aptos High School by constructing, upgrading, equipping a performing arts center, classrooms, cafeteria, athletic facilities, parking/traffic safety improvements; to construct, improve, equip Watsonville Area Schools, including libraries, athletic facilities, cafeterias, classroom spaces, parking, high school facilities, shall Pajaro Valley Unified School District issue $58,250,000 of bonds ($24,036,000 for Aptos High School/$34,214,000 for Watsonville area schools) at legal rates, with citizen oversight, annual audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9467, "fingerprint": "2002|200200198|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200198|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "002d67b403aa54c5", "measure_id": "200200198", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace earthquake damaged classrooms at C. T. English Middle School; provide drinkable water; construct, repair, acquire, furnish computer/science labs, libraries, school facilities/sites; repair roofs, floors, and water systems; qualify for State matching funds, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District issue $4,965,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 773, "no_votes": 386, "total_votes": 1159, "percent_yes": 66.69542709232097, "percent_no": 33.30457290767903, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.198562", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.869683", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace earthquake damaged classrooms at C. T. English Middle School; provide drinkable water; construct, repair, acquire, furnish computer/science labs, libraries, school facilities/sites; repair roofs, floors, and water systems; qualify for State matching funds, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District issue $4,965,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee, perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9464, "fingerprint": "2002|200200030|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200030|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "7a06f5718fe88596", "measure_id": "200200030", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Repeals the existing Santa Cruz County utility users tax, and prohibits the County of Santa Cruz from imposing any utility users tax in the future.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32716, "no_votes": 26592, "total_votes": 59308, "percent_yes": 55.1628785324071, "percent_no": 44.8371214675929, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.197660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.869127", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Repeals the existing Santa Cruz County utility users tax, and prohibits the County of Santa Cruz from imposing any utility users tax in the future.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9465, "fingerprint": "2002|200200104|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200104|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "02c149b8ba99ca27", "measure_id": "200200104", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 1,2,3,4,6,7 and 8 if Ordinance No. 16-ZC-190 of the City of Scotts Valley adopted by the City Council approving the specific plan amendment and development agreement of the \"Glenwood Residential Project located on the east and west sides of Glenwood Drive, north of Casa Way (APN 23-241-09,14)\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1824, "no_votes": 1756, "total_votes": 3580, "percent_yes": 50.949720670391066, "percent_no": 49.050279329608934, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.197991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.869312", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 1,2,3,4,6,7 and 8 if Ordinance No. 16-ZC-190 of the City of Scotts Valley adopted by the City Council approving the specific plan amendment and development agreement of the \"Glenwood Residential Project located on the east and west sides of Glenwood Drive, north of Casa Way (APN 23-241-09,14)\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9473, "fingerprint": "2002|200200292|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200292|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "8b2e3e49932c7ce6", "measure_id": "200200292", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors be authorized to impose a special tax through enactment of an ordinance establishing a 1% surtax on rent charged to guests of hotels and other transient accommodations located within the unincorporated area of Santa Cruz County, in addition to the amount now payable under the County's existing Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax, for the purpose of protecting the local economy by the promotion of tourism in Santa Cruz County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24899, "no_votes": 15940, "total_votes": 40839, "percent_yes": 60.9686818972061, "percent_no": 39.0313181027939, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.200223", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.870861", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors be authorized to impose a special tax through enactment of an ordinance establishing a 1% surtax on rent charged to guests of hotels and other transient accommodations located within the unincorporated area of Santa Cruz County, in addition to the amount now payable under the County's existing Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax, for the purpose of protecting the local economy by the promotion of tourism in Santa Cruz County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9476, "fingerprint": "2002|200200485|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200485|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "7c06d748a277cfe1", "measure_id": "200200485", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 3.29 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code which levies a Utility Users Tax upon persons in the City of Santa Cruz be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4819, "no_votes": 14424, "total_votes": 19243, "percent_yes": 25.04287273294185, "percent_no": 74.95712726705815, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.201093", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.871457", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 3.29 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code which levies a Utility Users Tax upon persons in the City of Santa Cruz be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9477, "fingerprint": "2002|200200486|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200486|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "dfbd4b8328784658", "measure_id": "200200486", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Cruz adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.28.030 of the Municipal Code by imposing a special one percent (1%) transient occupancy tax and dedicating the revenues from that special tax to the Santa Cruz County Conference and Visitors Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10465, "no_votes": 8214, "total_votes": 18679, "percent_yes": 56.02548316291022, "percent_no": 43.97451683708978, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.201363", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.871644", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Cruz adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.28.030 of the Municipal Code by imposing a special one percent (1%) transient occupancy tax and dedicating the revenues from that special tax to the Santa Cruz County Conference and Visitors Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9478, "fingerprint": "2002|200200487|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200487|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "71070de36fed1e07", "measure_id": "200200487", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To prevent reductions in general City services and programs, shall the existing utility users' tax of 4% on electricity and gas utilities, established by the City in 1992, be affirmed and ratified fixing the rate of tax at 4% on all gas and electrical charges only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2950, "no_votes": 1013, "total_votes": 3963, "percent_yes": 74.43855664900329, "percent_no": 25.56144335099671, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.201628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.871840", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent reductions in general City services and programs, shall the existing utility users' tax of 4% on electricity and gas utilities, established by the City in 1992, be affirmed and ratified fixing the rate of tax at 4% on all gas and electrical charges only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12002, "fingerprint": "2002|200200488|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200488|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "8449f1cd6a98374a", "measure_id": "200200488", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Watsonville adopt an ordinance adding Section 6-3.443 to the Watsonville Municipal code requiring that substances added to the public water supply for purposes other than to make water safe satisfy two new standards: (a) approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for specified purposes, and (b) cannot contain contaminants at concentrations exceeding either the U.S. Maximum Contaminant Level Goals or California Public Health Goals, whichever is more restrictive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3109, "no_votes": 2988, "total_votes": 6097, "percent_yes": 50.992291290798754, "percent_no": 49.007708709201246, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.071441", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.201899", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.872024", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Watsonville adopt an ordinance adding Section 6-3.443 to the Watsonville Municipal code requiring that substances added to the public water supply for purposes other than to make water safe satisfy two new standards: (a) approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for specified purposes, and (b) cannot contain contaminants at concentrations exceeding either the U.S. Maximum Contaminant Level Goals or California Public Health Goals, whichever is more restrictive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9466, "fingerprint": "2002|200200197|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200197|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "23a2b41791ec87bb", "measure_id": "200200197", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify for State matching funds, expand vocational education classrooms, upgrade electrical wiring, plumbing and restrooms and to construct, acquire, modernize and equip classrooms, buildings and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $11,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or other expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 24, "percent_yes": 87.5, "percent_no": 12.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.198293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.869495", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify for State matching funds, expand vocational education classrooms, upgrade electrical wiring, plumbing and restrooms and to construct, acquire, modernize and equip classrooms, buildings and sites, shall Aromas-San Juan Unified School District issue $11,200,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits and ensure that no bond money is used for salaries or other expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9479, "fingerprint": "2002|200200489|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200489|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ebad5c2c9dee4afd", "measure_id": "200200489", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Watsonville adopt an ordinance amending Section 3-6.303 of the Municipal Code by imposing a special one percent (1%) tax charged to guests of hotels and motels under the City's Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance for the purpose of protecting the local economy by continuing tourism promotion?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3960, "no_votes": 2036, "total_votes": 5996, "percent_yes": 66.04402935290193, "percent_no": 33.95597064709807, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.202182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.872211", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Watsonville adopt an ordinance amending Section 3-6.303 of the Municipal Code by imposing a special one percent (1%) tax charged to guests of hotels and motels under the City's Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance for the purpose of protecting the local economy by continuing tourism promotion?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9480, "fingerprint": "2002|200200490|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200490|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ca9f84a4f32318d6", "measure_id": "200200490", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Watsonville amend the Watsonville 2005 General Plan thereby imposing certain restrictions on growth, as specified, and restricting later amendments all as provided in the Watsonville Urban Limit Line and Development Timing Initiative?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3550, "no_votes": 2342, "total_votes": 5892, "percent_yes": 60.251188051595385, "percent_no": 39.748811948404615, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.202480", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.872393", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Watsonville amend the Watsonville 2005 General Plan thereby imposing certain restrictions on growth, as specified, and restricting later amendments all as provided in the Watsonville Urban Limit Line and Development Timing Initiative?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9481, "fingerprint": "2002|200200491|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200491|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "40040896a17320e1", "measure_id": "200200491", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Watsonville adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 3 (Mobile Home Park Rent Stabilization) of Title 11 (Mobile Homes and Parks) of the Watsonville Municipal Code establishing a procedure for Recovery of Expenses in Fair Rate Return Hearing and adding a Supplemental Administrative Fee of $0.50 per unit with an automatic cost of living adjustment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3401, "no_votes": 2322, "total_votes": 5723, "percent_yes": 59.426874017123886, "percent_no": 40.573125982876114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.202957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.872572", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Watsonville adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 3 (Mobile Home Park Rent Stabilization) of Title 11 (Mobile Homes and Parks) of the Watsonville Municipal Code establishing a procedure for Recovery of Expenses in Fair Rate Return Hearing and adding a Supplemental Administrative Fee of $0.50 per unit with an automatic cost of living adjustment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9474, "fingerprint": "2002|200200483|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200483|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "a9103bb38d4a4baa", "measure_id": "200200483", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Capitola adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.32.030 of the Municipal Code raising the transient occupancy tax rate from 9.5% to 11%, dedicating the revenue from .5% of the 1.5% differential increase to the General Fund and 1% of the 1.5% differential increase to the Santa Cruz County Conference and Visitors Council for the promotion of tourism in Santa Cruz County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1590, "no_votes": 1478, "total_votes": 3068, "percent_yes": 51.82529335071708, "percent_no": 48.17470664928292, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.200526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.871081", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Capitola adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.32.030 of the Municipal Code raising the transient occupancy tax rate from 9.5% to 11%, dedicating the revenue from .5% of the 1.5% differential increase to the General Fund and 1% of the 1.5% differential increase to the Santa Cruz County Conference and Visitors Council for the promotion of tourism in Santa Cruz County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9475, "fingerprint": "2002|200200484|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200484|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "3a1ff1f324c09292", "measure_id": "200200484", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should Measure X, a measure enacting an ordinance setting a limit of two consecutive terms for elected officials in Capitola, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1640, "no_votes": 1362, "total_votes": 3002, "percent_yes": 54.63024650233178, "percent_no": 45.36975349766822, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.200826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.871270", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Measure X, a measure enacting an ordinance setting a limit of two consecutive terms for elected officials in Capitola, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12003, "fingerprint": "2002|200200492|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200492|SHASTA", "content_hash": "92364c0b9c1eb642", "measure_id": "200200492", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the following initiative measure be enacted?  The citizens of Redding do ordain as follows.  The city shall not add to its drinking water any substance or chemical for the purpose of treating the physical or mental functions of any person unless the chemical meets certain enumerated criteria including, but not limited to, approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.  This measure exempts chemicals or substances intended to make the water safe or potable.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13060, "no_votes": 10199, "total_votes": 23259, "percent_yes": 56.15030740788512, "percent_no": 43.84969259211488, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.073317", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.204305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.873304", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the following initiative measure be enacted?  The citizens of Redding do ordain as follows.  The city shall not add to its drinking water any substance or chemical for the purpose of treating the physical or mental functions of any person unless the chemical meets certain enumerated criteria including, but not limited to, approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.  This measure exempts chemicals or substances intended to make the water safe or potable.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9484, "fingerprint": "2002|200200205|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200205|SHASTA", "content_hash": "d85e1d785fa5e868", "measure_id": "200200205", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs: construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades; construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens Oversight Committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22012, "no_votes": 15296, "total_votes": 37308, "percent_yes": 59.00075050927415, "percent_no": 40.99924949072585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.204029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.873119", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs: construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades; construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens Oversight Committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9483, "fingerprint": "2002|200200204|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200204|SHASTA", "content_hash": "fdb76a31ffb3cccf", "measure_id": "200200204", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "School Repair and Safety Measure.  To enhance student safety by repairing/replacing leaky roofs, reducing earthquake hazards, installing fire safety; upgrading electrical wiring to accommodate modern technology and bathroom plumbing systems; construct/acquire/equip classroom/facilities, replace rented classrooms with permanent buildings, shall Gateway Unified School District issue $22 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits, prevent waste and ensure that no money is used for salaries or other administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3623, "no_votes": 2241, "total_votes": 5864, "percent_yes": 61.7837653478854, "percent_no": 38.2162346521146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.203682", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.872937", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "School Repair and Safety Measure.  To enhance student safety by repairing/replacing leaky roofs, reducing earthquake hazards, installing fire safety; upgrading electrical wiring to accommodate modern technology and bathroom plumbing systems; construct/acquire/equip classroom/facilities, replace rented classrooms with permanent buildings, shall Gateway Unified School District issue $22 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform annual audits, prevent waste and ensure that no money is used for salaries or other administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9485, "fingerprint": "2002|200200105|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200105|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "a2bba526c69efac3", "measure_id": "200200105", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council of the City of Yreka levy a special tax for a 5-year period for the Yreka Volunteer Fire Department on each improved legal parcel within the City.  The Tax will be used for the sole purpose of acquiring Fire Fighting or Rescue equipment or vehicles and for the improvement or construction of fire stations, sub-stations, or training facilities.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1225, "no_votes": 878, "total_votes": 2103, "percent_yes": 58.25011887779363, "percent_no": 41.74988112220637, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.204591", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.873491", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council of the City of Yreka levy a special tax for a 5-year period for the Yreka Volunteer Fire Department on each improved legal parcel within the City.  The Tax will be used for the sole purpose of acquiring Fire Fighting or Rescue equipment or vehicles and for the improvement or construction of fire stations, sub-stations, or training facilities.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9486, "fingerprint": "2002|200200637|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200637|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "23f1e765cb2b6cb3", "measure_id": "200200637", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to enable the Etna Union High School District to improve the quality of education by constructing and modernizing school facilities, shall the District issue $1.56 million in bonds, at interest rates below the legal limit, to construct, modernize, repair and equip classroom and other school facilities to meet safety and instructional need and create additional space for educational  programs and other needs, subject to annual audits and oversight by an independent citizen's committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1010, "no_votes": 1003, "total_votes": 2013, "percent_yes": 50.173869846001, "percent_no": 49.826130153999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.204871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.873677", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to enable the Etna Union High School District to improve the quality of education by constructing and modernizing school facilities, shall the District issue $1.56 million in bonds, at interest rates below the legal limit, to construct, modernize, repair and equip classroom and other school facilities to meet safety and instructional need and create additional space for educational  programs and other needs, subject to annual audits and oversight by an independent citizen's committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9489, "fingerprint": "2002|200200207|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200207|SOLANO", "content_hash": "35a1cf50d41df430", "measure_id": "200200207", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $265 Million dollars in bonds at the lowest available interest rate, for building and repairing classrooms and facilities; upgrading academic and vocational education programs including computer sciences, electronics, nursing and high-tech training facilities; upgrading libraries; building new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and making building safety improvements at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College campuses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5, "no_votes": 4, "total_votes": 9, "percent_yes": 55.55555555555556, "percent_no": 44.44444444444444, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.205834", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.874221", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $265 Million dollars in bonds at the lowest available interest rate, for building and repairing classrooms and facilities; upgrading academic and vocational education programs including computer sciences, electronics, nursing and high-tech training facilities; upgrading libraries; building new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and making building safety improvements at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College campuses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9488, "fingerprint": "2002|200200206|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200206|SOLANO", "content_hash": "b4546789148b560e", "measure_id": "200200206", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide adequate classrooms, make essential health, safety and building repairs at aging school facilities, relieve severe overcrowding by acquiring, constructing or renovating local school sites, and qualify for state construction and renovation funding, shall the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District be authorized to issue One Hundred Million Dollars in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and conduct annual audits to ensure funds are only spent on school construction efforts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11288, "no_votes": 7496, "total_votes": 18784, "percent_yes": 60.09369676320273, "percent_no": 39.90630323679727, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.205486", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.874040", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate classrooms, make essential health, safety and building repairs at aging school facilities, relieve severe overcrowding by acquiring, constructing or renovating local school sites, and qualify for state construction and renovation funding, shall the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District be authorized to issue One Hundred Million Dollars in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and conduct annual audits to ensure funds are only spent on school construction efforts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9487, "fingerprint": "2002|200200106|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200106|SOLANO", "content_hash": "33120cf1437a8253", "measure_id": "200200106", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City continue to impose the existing 10% hotel tax, to be paid by guests and collected by hotel operators?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2389, "no_votes": 944, "total_votes": 3333, "percent_yes": 71.67716771677168, "percent_no": 28.322832283228323, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.205152", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.873858", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City continue to impose the existing 10% hotel tax, to be paid by guests and collected by hotel operators?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9490, "fingerprint": "2002|200200293|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200293|SOLANO", "content_hash": "170f632595bb9de9", "measure_id": "200200293", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Solano County voters authorize the 20 year Solano County Transportation Expenditure Plan directing County sales tax revenues to the following transportation projects:  - Improvements to the I-80/I-680 Interchange;  - Improvements to highways including I-80 and highway 12;  - New BART Commuter Rail Service;  -  Funds to maintain Local streets and roads;  - Transit service for seniors and the disabled?  Approval of the Expenditure Plan authorizes collection of a 1/2 cent sales tax during the Plan's implementation.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 50914, "no_votes": 33828, "total_votes": 84742, "percent_yes": 60.08118760472965, "percent_no": 39.91881239527035, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.206244", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.874401", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Solano County voters authorize the 20 year Solano County Transportation Expenditure Plan directing County sales tax revenues to the following transportation projects:  - Improvements to the I-80/I-680 Interchange;  - Improvements to highways including I-80 and highway 12;  - New BART Commuter Rail Service;  -  Funds to maintain Local streets and roads;  - Transit service for seniors and the disabled?  Approval of the Expenditure Plan authorizes collection of a 1/2 cent sales tax during the Plan's implementation.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9493, "fingerprint": "2002|200200639|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200639|SOLANO", "content_hash": "af3cecb90258121d", "measure_id": "200200639", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade 30 year old classrooms, science labs, libraries, electrical wiring, technology, heating/ventilation systems/lighting for student safety; replace portable classrooms; expand/establish facilities in Vacaville/Vallejo; prepare Solano College students for jobs/four-year colleges, shall Solano County Community College District issue $124.5 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform annual audits to ensure the legal/proper use of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45526, "no_votes": 36411, "total_votes": 81937, "percent_yes": 55.56220022700368, "percent_no": 44.43779977299632, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.207058", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.874944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade 30 year old classrooms, science labs, libraries, electrical wiring, technology, heating/ventilation systems/lighting for student safety; replace portable classrooms; expand/establish facilities in Vacaville/Vallejo; prepare Solano College students for jobs/four-year colleges, shall Solano County Community College District issue $124.5 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform annual audits to ensure the legal/proper use of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9491, "fingerprint": "2002|200200493|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200493|SOLANO", "content_hash": "5204c7044496c50c", "measure_id": "200200493", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Continuance, Ratification of Existing Utility Users Tax:  Shall an ordinance be adopted that continues and ratifies the existing two percent Utility Users Tax in order to fund City services in the City of Fairfield, provided that low income seniors and low income disabled persons are exempted from the Tax and all expenditures are subject to an annual audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10616, "no_votes": 7708, "total_votes": 18324, "percent_yes": 57.93494870115696, "percent_no": 42.06505129884304, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.206515", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.874582", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Continuance, Ratification of Existing Utility Users Tax:  Shall an ordinance be adopted that continues and ratifies the existing two percent Utility Users Tax in order to fund City services in the City of Fairfield, provided that low income seniors and low income disabled persons are exempted from the Tax and all expenditures are subject to an annual audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9492, "fingerprint": "2002|200200638|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200638|SOLANO", "content_hash": "48c4312f8947c8da", "measure_id": "200200638", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build a new high school in Dixon, to relieve school and classroom overcrowding, to build computer, science and technology labs, and to provide better access to job training, shall the Dixon Unified School District issue bonds in the amount of $29,200,000, at interest rates within legal limits, with a citizens' oversight committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3313, "no_votes": 1583, "total_votes": 4896, "percent_yes": 67.66748366013073, "percent_no": 32.33251633986927, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.206788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.874764", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build a new high school in Dixon, to relieve school and classroom overcrowding, to build computer, science and technology labs, and to provide better access to job training, shall the Dixon Unified School District issue bonds in the amount of $29,200,000, at interest rates within legal limits, with a citizens' oversight committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9497, "fingerprint": "2002|200200229|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200229|SONOMA", "content_hash": "3478195debf8772c", "measure_id": "200200229", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Violet A. Wilder be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Kashia School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19, "no_votes": 10, "total_votes": 29, "percent_yes": 65.51724137931035, "percent_no": 34.48275862068965, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-09-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.208271", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.875665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Violet A. Wilder be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Kashia School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9498, "fingerprint": "2002|200200230|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200230|SONOMA", "content_hash": "10902bb38b2dd312", "measure_id": "200200230", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Leroy V. Wilder be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Kashia School Distirct?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19, "no_votes": 10, "total_votes": 29, "percent_yes": 65.51724137931035, "percent_no": 34.48275862068965, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-09-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.208539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.875851", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Leroy V. Wilder be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Kashia School Distirct?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9496, "fingerprint": "2002|200200210|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200210|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c3665634820da95c", "measure_id": "200200210", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Santa Rosa Junior College (Santa Rosa, Petaluma, all locations) prepare students for jobs and four year colleges by acquiring, constructing, furnishing, repairing deteriorating classrooms, libraries, laboratories, sites, parking; upgrading fire safety, ventilation/plumbing, electrical, computer technology wiring; replacing portables; completing and upgrading training centers for firefighters, police, nurses, paramedics, technology; by Sonoma County Junior College District issuing $251,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, with Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits and no money for operations or administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76586, "no_votes": 36264, "total_votes": 112850, "percent_yes": 67.8653079308817, "percent_no": 32.1346920691183, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.208003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.875482", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Santa Rosa Junior College (Santa Rosa, Petaluma, all locations) prepare students for jobs and four year colleges by acquiring, constructing, furnishing, repairing deteriorating classrooms, libraries, laboratories, sites, parking; upgrading fire safety, ventilation/plumbing, electrical, computer technology wiring; replacing portables; completing and upgrading training centers for firefighters, police, nurses, paramedics, technology; by Sonoma County Junior College District issuing $251,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, with Citizens' Oversight Committee, annual audits and no money for operations or administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9495, "fingerprint": "2002|200200209|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200209|SONOMA", "content_hash": "d8f59f75398f4461", "measure_id": "200200209", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve classroom technology and internet access and make campus safety repairs and renovations to Santa Rosa's middle and high schools, install new fire safety systems,remove asbestos and lead-based paint, replace deteriorating portable classrooms, upgrade heating, plumbing and other systems to current State standards, and to qualify for State matching funds, shall the Santa Rosa High School District isue $77,230,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, and establish an independent citizens' committe to monitor spending?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29726, "no_votes": 14981, "total_votes": 44707, "percent_yes": 66.49070615339879, "percent_no": 33.50929384660121, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.207731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.875303", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve classroom technology and internet access and make campus safety repairs and renovations to Santa Rosa's middle and high schools, install new fire safety systems,remove asbestos and lead-based paint, replace deteriorating portable classrooms, upgrade heating, plumbing and other systems to current State standards, and to qualify for State matching funds, shall the Santa Rosa High School District isue $77,230,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, and establish an independent citizens' committe to monitor spending?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9494, "fingerprint": "2002|200200208|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200208|SONOMA", "content_hash": "cec4a15e0f4846f4", "measure_id": "200200208", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to upgrade elementary school campus safety, remove asbestos and lead-based paint, replace deteriorating portable classrooms, renovate classrooms for new technology and internet access, repair and renovate heating, lighting, plumbing, fire safety, security and other campus systems and structures, and to qualify for State matching funds, shall the Santa Rosa Elementary School District issue $19,125,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, and establish an independent citizens' committe to monitor district spending?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9204, "no_votes": 3870, "total_votes": 13074, "percent_yes": 70.39926571821937, "percent_no": 29.600734281780632, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.207327", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.875124", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to upgrade elementary school campus safety, remove asbestos and lead-based paint, replace deteriorating portable classrooms, renovate classrooms for new technology and internet access, repair and renovate heating, lighting, plumbing, fire safety, security and other campus systems and structures, and to qualify for State matching funds, shall the Santa Rosa Elementary School District issue $19,125,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, and establish an independent citizens' committe to monitor district spending?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9512, "fingerprint": "2002|200200640|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200640|SONOMA", "content_hash": "90bcdbc5fd02557f", "measure_id": "200200640", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade Healdsburg High School athletic facilities for school and community use, including to repair and refurbish deteriorating athletic fields and courts, install all-weather track, and upgrade restrooms; acquire or construct classrooms to replace State-owned portable classrooms; construct a District-wide teacher in-service training area; and for other specified projects, shall the Healdsburg Unified School District issue $3,990,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with guaranteed annual financial audits, a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3922, "no_votes": 2101, "total_votes": 6023, "percent_yes": 65.1170513033372, "percent_no": 34.882948696662794, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.212665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.878399", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade Healdsburg High School athletic facilities for school and community use, including to repair and refurbish deteriorating athletic fields and courts, install all-weather track, and upgrade restrooms; acquire or construct classrooms to replace State-owned portable classrooms; construct a District-wide teacher in-service training area; and for other specified projects, shall the Healdsburg Unified School District issue $3,990,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates, with guaranteed annual financial audits, a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9513, "fingerprint": "2002|200200641|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200641|SONOMA", "content_hash": "cbda3f19a18cf4a8", "measure_id": "200200641", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and build new classrooms at Foss Creek and Healdsburg Elementary School, and rebuild Fitch Mountain School, including to fix leaky roofs, and outdated plumbing and restrooms; upgrade heating/cooling systems; install energy efficient lighting; upgrade wiring for computer technology; resurface deteriorationg school grounds; and for other specified project, shall Healdsburg Unified School District issue $18,820,000 in School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 bonds at lawful interest rates, with guaranteed annual financial audits, a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3519, "no_votes": 1695, "total_votes": 5214, "percent_yes": 67.49136939010357, "percent_no": 32.50863060989643, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.213056", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.878580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and build new classrooms at Foss Creek and Healdsburg Elementary School, and rebuild Fitch Mountain School, including to fix leaky roofs, and outdated plumbing and restrooms; upgrade heating/cooling systems; install energy efficient lighting; upgrade wiring for computer technology; resurface deteriorationg school grounds; and for other specified project, shall Healdsburg Unified School District issue $18,820,000 in School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 bonds at lawful interest rates, with guaranteed annual financial audits, a citizens' oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9514, "fingerprint": "2002|200200642|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200642|SONOMA", "content_hash": "fe94040317f7ae49", "measure_id": "200200642", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable Mark West Union School District to bring existing schools up to standard, including to modernize classrooms; improve electrical systems and access to technology; make health and safety improvements; upgrade plumbing, restrooms, heating, ventilations and air conditioning; replace roofing; and construct classrooms; and to qualify for State funds for eligible projects; shall the Distirct issue $11,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within the statutory limit, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2957, "no_votes": 1391, "total_votes": 4348, "percent_yes": 68.00827966881324, "percent_no": 31.991720331186755, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.213331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.878763", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable Mark West Union School District to bring existing schools up to standard, including to modernize classrooms; improve electrical systems and access to technology; make health and safety improvements; upgrade plumbing, restrooms, heating, ventilations and air conditioning; replace roofing; and construct classrooms; and to qualify for State funds for eligible projects; shall the Distirct issue $11,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within the statutory limit, with annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9516, "fingerprint": "2002|200200644|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200644|SONOMA", "content_hash": "2af2d652357059fe", "measure_id": "200200644", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds needed to improve aging school facilities, including electrical/fire safety; plumbing, heating, lighting and major system renovations; modernize older classrooms; add permanent classroom, kindergartens and day care; build new library/media technology centers; improve security, seismic safety and handicapped access; and repace portable classrooms, shall the Rincon Valley Union School District be authorized to issue $30,000,000 in bonds at interest rates not exceeding the statutory limit for construction, improvement, acquisition and renovation of school facilities and grounds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9187, "no_votes": 5041, "total_votes": 14228, "percent_yes": 64.56986224346359, "percent_no": 35.43013775653641, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.214046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.879131", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds needed to improve aging school facilities, including electrical/fire safety; plumbing, heating, lighting and major system renovations; modernize older classrooms; add permanent classroom, kindergartens and day care; build new library/media technology centers; improve security, seismic safety and handicapped access; and repace portable classrooms, shall the Rincon Valley Union School District be authorized to issue $30,000,000 in bonds at interest rates not exceeding the statutory limit for construction, improvement, acquisition and renovation of school facilities and grounds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9505, "fingerprint": "2002|200200500|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200500|SONOMA", "content_hash": "23e84af74554b5aa", "measure_id": "200200500", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing local taxes, shall the City of Santa Rosa be authorized to increase its approval of the development, construction or acquisition of units as affordable rental housing for low income persons, including the elderly and disabled?  Such housing shall only be owned by private developers who receive federal, state or local assistance and shall be authorized annually in an amount not to exceed one percent (1%) of the existing housing units in Santa Rosa.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26316, "no_votes": 15185, "total_votes": 41501, "percent_yes": 63.41052022842823, "percent_no": 36.58947977157177, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.210662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.877120", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing local taxes, shall the City of Santa Rosa be authorized to increase its approval of the development, construction or acquisition of units as affordable rental housing for low income persons, including the elderly and disabled?  Such housing shall only be owned by private developers who receive federal, state or local assistance and shall be authorized annually in an amount not to exceed one percent (1%) of the existing housing units in Santa Rosa.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9506, "fingerprint": "2002|200200501|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200501|SONOMA", "content_hash": "b6c8356aa171f727", "measure_id": "200200501", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Charter Amendments. Shall amendments to the Santa Rosa City Charter be adopted relating to the City Council, Ordinances, Task Force to increase Citizen Participation, establishment of a District Commission, Pariticipation and Diversity in Boards and  Commissions, Officers, City Clerk, Police Chief, Fire Chief, City Engineers, Board of Pubilc Utilities, the fixing of water and sewer rates and fees, the Budget, Compensation of Appointed Officers, appointment of Deputies, and Contract Work and which delete and renumber certain sections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23240, "no_votes": 14917, "total_votes": 38157, "percent_yes": 60.90625573289304, "percent_no": 39.09374426710696, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.210935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.877300", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Charter Amendments. Shall amendments to the Santa Rosa City Charter be adopted relating to the City Council, Ordinances, Task Force to increase Citizen Participation, establishment of a District Commission, Pariticipation and Diversity in Boards and  Commissions, Officers, City Clerk, Police Chief, Fire Chief, City Engineers, Board of Pubilc Utilities, the fixing of water and sewer rates and fees, the Budget, Compensation of Appointed Officers, appointment of Deputies, and Contract Work and which delete and renumber certain sections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9507, "fingerprint": "2002|200200502|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200502|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4adbe43604f70f86", "measure_id": "200200502", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Council Compensation. Shall an amendment to the Santa Rosa City Charter be adopted to provide stated amounts of monthly compensation to be paid Council members and the Mayor, provided for future increasees or decreases based on a cost of living index, and provide certain other benefits through participation in certain City plans, such as its retirement, health insure and disability plans?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15947, "no_votes": 24490, "total_votes": 40437, "percent_yes": 39.43665454905161, "percent_no": 60.56334545094839, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.211273", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.877484", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Council Compensation. Shall an amendment to the Santa Rosa City Charter be adopted to provide stated amounts of monthly compensation to be paid Council members and the Mayor, provided for future increasees or decreases based on a cost of living index, and provide certain other benefits through participation in certain City plans, such as its retirement, health insure and disability plans?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9515, "fingerprint": "2002|200200643|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200643|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e9ff5bc9b8e555ca", "measure_id": "200200643", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for four-year colleges and jobs including nursing, law enforcement and business, retrain workers, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Napa Valley Community College District repair, acquire, equip, construct classrooms, buildings, libraries, and labs; restore deteriorating roofs and grounds; improve disabled access; upgrade outdated technology, lighting, wiring, fire satety systems, plumbing and ventilation by issuing $133.8 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual financial audits, Citiziens' Oversight Committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 160, "no_votes": 98, "total_votes": 258, "percent_yes": 62.01550387596899, "percent_no": 37.98449612403101, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.213603", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.878942", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for four-year colleges and jobs including nursing, law enforcement and business, retrain workers, and qualify for state matching funds, shall Napa Valley Community College District repair, acquire, equip, construct classrooms, buildings, libraries, and labs; restore deteriorating roofs and grounds; improve disabled access; upgrade outdated technology, lighting, wiring, fire satety systems, plumbing and ventilation by issuing $133.8 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual financial audits, Citiziens' Oversight Committee, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9508, "fingerprint": "2002|200200503|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200503|SONOMA", "content_hash": "d3183016f3933287", "measure_id": "200200503", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Campaign Finance Reform. Shall an amendment to the Santa Rosa City Charter be adopted which adds a section that requires the City Council to enact measures which set lower limits on Council election campaign contributions, establishes a new schedule for reporting campaign contributions for Council candidates, and provides for public financing of Council election campaigns?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25321, "no_votes": 14980, "total_votes": 40301, "percent_yes": 62.82970645889681, "percent_no": 37.17029354110319, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.211543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.877667", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Campaign Finance Reform. Shall an amendment to the Santa Rosa City Charter be adopted which adds a section that requires the City Council to enact measures which set lower limits on Council election campaign contributions, establishes a new schedule for reporting campaign contributions for Council candidates, and provides for public financing of Council election campaigns?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9499, "fingerprint": "2002|200200494|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200494|SONOMA", "content_hash": "6c074d977b15b628", "measure_id": "200200494", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City continue the existing hotel tax, paid by guests and collected by hotel operators, at the rate of 10% of the room rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3430, "no_votes": 382, "total_votes": 3812, "percent_yes": 89.97901364113326, "percent_no": 10.020986358866736, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.208901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.876033", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City continue the existing hotel tax, paid by guests and collected by hotel operators, at the rate of 10% of the room rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9500, "fingerprint": "2002|200200495|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200495|SONOMA", "content_hash": "2f56734e13216c3e", "measure_id": "200200495", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the revenue from the existing hotel tax be committed solely to providing the public with parks, recreation, and community services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2962, "no_votes": 792, "total_votes": 3754, "percent_yes": 78.90250399573789, "percent_no": 21.097496004262112, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.209226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.876215", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the revenue from the existing hotel tax be committed solely to providing the public with parks, recreation, and community services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9501, "fingerprint": "2002|200200496|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200496|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f5f9f71e6ace59e6", "measure_id": "200200496", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance establishing a Dog Park and providing for the temporary use of Recreation Park until the Dog Park becomes a reality be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 830, "no_votes": 3033, "total_votes": 3863, "percent_yes": 21.48589179394253, "percent_no": 78.51410820605747, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.209495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.876399", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance establishing a Dog Park and providing for the temporary use of Recreation Park until the Dog Park becomes a reality be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9502, "fingerprint": "2002|200200497|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200497|SONOMA", "content_hash": "b20207580c5ea1e1", "measure_id": "200200497", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a tax be imposed on telephone communications and video services at the rate of 4% for residential users and 6% for commercial users beginnning on January 1, 2003?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2079, "no_votes": 7777, "total_votes": 9856, "percent_yes": 21.09375, "percent_no": 78.90625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.209766", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.876582", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a tax be imposed on telephone communications and video services at the rate of 4% for residential users and 6% for commercial users beginnning on January 1, 2003?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9503, "fingerprint": "2002|200200498|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200498|SONOMA", "content_hash": "b16783d7c6847a8e", "measure_id": "200200498", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax paid by hotel and motel guests in Rohnert Park be increased to 12% commencing on December 1, 2002?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5824, "no_votes": 4022, "total_votes": 9846, "percent_yes": 59.15092423319115, "percent_no": 40.84907576680885, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.210047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.876762", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax paid by hotel and motel guests in Rohnert Park be increased to 12% commencing on December 1, 2002?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9504, "fingerprint": "2002|200200499|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200499|SONOMA", "content_hash": "7f4a3e2a462db101", "measure_id": "200200499", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the increases in the Business License Tax - that have been paid by certain businesses in Rohnert Park since 1992 and not increased since then - remain in effect?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6445, "no_votes": 3300, "total_votes": 9745, "percent_yes": 66.13648024628014, "percent_no": 33.86351975371986, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.210317", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.876942", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the increases in the Business License Tax - that have been paid by certain businesses in Rohnert Park since 1992 and not increased since then - remain in effect?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9509, "fingerprint": "2002|200200504|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200504|SONOMA", "content_hash": "42f8197d6f028557", "measure_id": "200200504", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City increase the Sales Tax by 0.125% with the proceeds of the tax to be deposited in the General Fund, to be used for all general governmental needs of the City including, but not limited to, capital equipment requirements, fire protection, street maintenance, park maintenance, and police services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1809, "no_votes": 903, "total_votes": 2712, "percent_yes": 66.70353982300885, "percent_no": 33.29646017699115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.211848", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.877847", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the Sales Tax by 0.125% with the proceeds of the tax to be deposited in the General Fund, to be used for all general governmental needs of the City including, but not limited to, capital equipment requirements, fire protection, street maintenance, park maintenance, and police services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9510, "fingerprint": "2002|200200505|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200505|SONOMA", "content_hash": "dcbaeb8a359d4d4b", "measure_id": "200200505", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance adopting a salary of $300 per month for the mayor and members of the City Council of the City of Sonoma be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1342, "no_votes": 1729, "total_votes": 3071, "percent_yes": 43.69912080755454, "percent_no": 56.30087919244546, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.212117", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.878034", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance adopting a salary of $300 per month for the mayor and members of the City Council of the City of Sonoma be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9511, "fingerprint": "2002|200200506|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200506|SONOMA", "content_hash": "00752dc3211f2b1c", "measure_id": "200200506", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a Town of Windsor ordinance be enacted limiting residential building permits (\"permits\"), other than \"permits\" under existing development agreements (\"agreements\"), to 150 in any 3 year rolling period (\"period\"), provided that if total \"permits\" issued during life of \"agrements\" is less than 225 per \"period,\" Town may issue additional \"permits,\" not exceeding 225 total in any \"period\"  and thereafter limit \"permit\" to 225 per \"period\" and exempt low and moderate income housing from limitations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2653, "no_votes": 4100, "total_votes": 6753, "percent_yes": 39.28624315119206, "percent_no": 60.71375684880794, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.212387", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.878218", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Town of Windsor ordinance be enacted limiting residential building permits (\"permits\"), other than \"permits\" under existing development agreements (\"agreements\"), to 150 in any 3 year rolling period (\"period\"), provided that if total \"permits\" issued during life of \"agrements\" is less than 225 per \"period,\" Town may issue additional \"permits,\" not exceeding 225 total in any \"period\"  and thereafter limit \"permit\" to 225 per \"period\" and exempt low and moderate income housing from limitations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9518, "fingerprint": "2002|200200507|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200507|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "317041999aea4bf7", "measure_id": "200200507", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be adopted amending the City's existing transient occupancy tax to increase the tax charged to occupants of hotels and motels from five percent (5%) to eight percent (8%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2821, "no_votes": 3455, "total_votes": 6276, "percent_yes": 44.94901210962396, "percent_no": 55.05098789037604, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.214629", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.879500", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be adopted amending the City's existing transient occupancy tax to increase the tax charged to occupants of hotels and motels from five percent (5%) to eight percent (8%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9519, "fingerprint": "2002|200200508|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200508|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "c57459aad0663900", "measure_id": "200200508", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of Mayor be four (4) years, commencing with the election in 2004.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1640, "no_votes": 941, "total_votes": 2581, "percent_yes": 63.541263076327006, "percent_no": 36.458736923672994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.214904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.879682", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of Mayor be four (4) years, commencing with the election in 2004.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9522, "fingerprint": "2002|200200645|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200645|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "163cfbb6cb606609", "measure_id": "200200645", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize Oakdale High and enlarge its campus, modernize existing and build new elementary schools, replace portables, build new high school and junior high library/media centers, build new aquatic center and athletic fields at the high school, and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District issue $20 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4868, "no_votes": 2136, "total_votes": 7004, "percent_yes": 69.50314106225014, "percent_no": 30.496858937749863, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.215712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.880223", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize Oakdale High and enlarge its campus, modernize existing and build new elementary schools, replace portables, build new high school and junior high library/media centers, build new aquatic center and athletic fields at the high school, and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the Oakdale Joint Unified School District issue $20 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9524, "fingerprint": "2002|200200647|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200647|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "77d21dc80df875b9", "measure_id": "200200647", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To accommodate increasing student enrollment and to relieve and prevent overcrowding, shall the Turlock Joint Elementary School District issue $10,950,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to construct two new elementary schools and modernize the Dutcher Middle School as specified in the District's bond Project List, and establish a citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8876, "no_votes": 3938, "total_votes": 12814, "percent_yes": 69.26798813797409, "percent_no": 30.732011862025914, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.216358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.880587", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To accommodate increasing student enrollment and to relieve and prevent overcrowding, shall the Turlock Joint Elementary School District issue $10,950,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to construct two new elementary schools and modernize the Dutcher Middle School as specified in the District's bond Project List, and establish a citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9523, "fingerprint": "2002|200200646|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200646|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "ddd331a47af8c3b1", "measure_id": "200200646", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide students with a multipurpose building/community center for use by students and the Paradise community, shall the Paradise Elementary School District issue up to $400,000 in general obligation bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a detailed project list, a citizen oversight committe and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 181, "no_votes": 102, "total_votes": 283, "percent_yes": 63.95759717314488, "percent_no": 36.04240282685512, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.215983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.880406", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide students with a multipurpose building/community center for use by students and the Paradise community, shall the Paradise Elementary School District issue up to $400,000 in general obligation bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a detailed project list, a citizen oversight committe and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9520, "fingerprint": "2002|200200509|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200509|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200200509", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6201, "no_votes": 5749, "total_votes": 11950, "percent_yes": 51.89121338912134, "percent_no": 48.10878661087866, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.215171", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.879862", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9521, "fingerprint": "2002|200200510|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200510|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "200200510", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5881, "no_votes": 6077, "total_votes": 11958, "percent_yes": 49.18046496069577, "percent_no": 50.81953503930423, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.215439", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.880044", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9517, "fingerprint": "2002|200200211|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200211|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "790bc24502c60aae", "measure_id": "200200211", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To qualify the District to receive $1,500,000 in State funds and to provide students with a multiple purpose building/community center for use by the students and the Paradise community, shall the Paradise Elementary School District issue $660,000 in general obligation bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with a citizen oversight committee and independent audits to guarantee all money stays in our community to benefit local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 151, "no_votes": 88, "total_votes": 239, "percent_yes": 63.17991631799163, "percent_no": 36.82008368200837, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.214320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.879317", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify the District to receive $1,500,000 in State funds and to provide students with a multiple purpose building/community center for use by the students and the Paradise community, shall the Paradise Elementary School District issue $660,000 in general obligation bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with a citizen oversight committee and independent audits to guarantee all money stays in our community to benefit local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 1135, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1113|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1113|Statewide", "content_hash": "0c3a7768427fc66c", "measure_id": "CA1113", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 44", "description": "Chiropractors. Unprofessional Conduct. Legislative Initiative Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 79.80000305, "percent_no": 20.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended state law to define unprofessional conduct by chiropract...", "summary_text": "This measure amended state law to define unprofessional conduct by chiropractors and establish disciplinary procedures for violations. It gave the state chiropractic board authority to investigate complaints and take disciplinary action against chiropractors who engage in specified unprofessional behaviors.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 44", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_44_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2044%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2044%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1134, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1112|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1112|Statewide", "content_hash": "a4712e2257f3e0a7", "measure_id": "CA1112", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 48", "description": "Court Consolidation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.40000153, "percent_no": 27.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 48", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_48_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2048%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2048%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1133, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1111|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1111|Statewide", "content_hash": "d3dd7a2e0b0af30f", "measure_id": "CA1111", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 43", "description": "Right to Have Vote Counted. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.59999847, "percent_no": 28.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment establishes the right of California voters to h...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment establishes the right of California voters to have their votes counted and requires that voting systems and procedures be designed to ensure accurate vote counting. The measure mandates that election officials take steps to protect the integrity of the voting process and verify that all valid votes are properly tallied.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 43", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_43_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2043%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2043%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1132, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1110|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1110|Statewide", "content_hash": "d4f434f791be79bb", "measure_id": "CA1110", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 42", "description": "Transportation Congestion Improvement Act. Allocation of Existing Motor Vehicle Fuel Sales and Use Tax Revenues for Transportation Purposes Only. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.09999847, "percent_no": 30.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment dedicated existing motor vehicle fuel sales and...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment dedicated existing motor vehicle fuel sales and use tax revenues exclusively to transportation purposes, preventing the legislature from diverting these funds to other programs. It required that gasoline tax money be used only for transportation-related projects and improvements.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 42", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_42_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2042%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2042%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1131, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1109|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1109|Statewide", "content_hash": "34b62461518154c6", "measure_id": "CA1109", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 47", "description": "Education Facilities: Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Acts of 2002 and 2004", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.90000153, "percent_no": 41.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $13", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $13.05 billion in general obligation bonds to fund construction, renovation, and equipment for public education facilities from kindergarten through university level. The bonds were to be issued in two phases, with $11.4 billion available immediately in 2002 and $1.65 billion available in 2004.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 47", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_47_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2047%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2047%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1130, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1108|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1108|Statewide", "content_hash": "96f2415bad0eeee2", "measure_id": "CA1108", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 46", "description": "Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2002", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.5, "percent_no": 42.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $2", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $2.1 billion in general obligation bonds to fund housing programs for low-income families, veterans, seniors, disabled persons, and homeless individuals. The bonds would finance affordable housing development, homeownership assistance, emergency shelters, and supportive housing programs across California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 46", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_46_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2046%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2046%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1129, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1107|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1107|Statewide", "content_hash": "a55b3cfbb0c5e8af", "measure_id": "CA1107", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 40", "description": "Bond Measure: California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act of 2002", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.90000153, "percent_no": 43.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized $2", "summary_text": "This measure authorized $2.6 billion in bonds to fund water quality improvements, air quality projects, safe neighborhood parks, and coastal protection programs throughout California. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 40", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_40_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2040%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2040%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1128, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1106|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1106|Statewide", "content_hash": "374d9826b0b5b291", "measure_id": "CA1106", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 49", "description": "After School Programs. State Grants. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.59999847, "percent_no": 43.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established state grants to fund after-school programs for stude...", "summary_text": "This measure established state grants to fund after-school programs for students in kindergarten through ninth grade. It authorized $550 million annually in state funding for these programs, with grants allocated to schools and community organizations based on student enrollment.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 49", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_49_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2049%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2049%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1127, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1105|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1105|Statewide", "content_hash": "1e700a929ac8d2c3", "measure_id": "CA1105", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 50", "description": "Water Quality, Supply and Safe Drinking Water Projects. Coastal Wetlands Purchase and Protection. Bonds. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.29999924, "percent_no": 44.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund water quality...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund water quality improvement projects, safe drinking water infrastructure, water supply development, and the purchase and protection of coastal wetlands. The initiative provided funding for various water-related infrastructure and environmental protection projects throughout California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 50", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_50_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2050%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2050%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1126, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1104|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1104|Statewide", "content_hash": "62199010704dc6a1", "measure_id": "CA1104", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 41", "description": "Voting Modernization Bond Act of 2002. (Shelley-Hertzberg Act)", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.59999847, "percent_no": 48.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The Voting Modernization Bond Act of 2002 authorized the state to issue bonds...", "summary_text": "The Voting Modernization Bond Act of 2002 authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the replacement of outdated voting equipment with modern voting systems in California counties. The measure provided financial assistance to help counties upgrade their voting technology to improve accuracy and accessibility.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 41", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_41_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2041%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2041%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1125, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1103|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1103|Statewide", "content_hash": "c97799288c7808b1", "measure_id": "CA1103", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 45", "description": "Legislative Term Limits. Local Voter Petitions. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.29999924, "percent_no": 57.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures | Term Limits\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed local voters to petition for legislative term...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed local voters to petition for legislative term limits in their districts and instructed their representatives to support a constitutional amendment establishing term limits for California legislators. It would have created a process for citizens to place term limit measures on local ballots and required legislators to advocate for statewide term limits if their constituents voted in favor.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 45", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_45_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2045%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2045%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1124, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1102|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1102|Statewide", "content_hash": "137a31c578cd5616", "measure_id": "CA1102", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 51", "description": "Transportation. Allocation of Sales and Use Taxes Raised From Sale or Lease of Motor Vehicles. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.29999924, "percent_no": 58.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have required that all sales and use taxes collected fr...", "summary_text": "This initiative would have required that all sales and use taxes collected from the sale or lease of motor vehicles be allocated to transportation-related purposes rather than the state's general fund. The measure aimed to dedicate this specific revenue stream to fund transportation infrastructure and programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 51", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_51_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2051%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2051%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1123, "fingerprint": "2002|CA1101|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|CA1101|Statewide", "content_hash": "4dacfbb6daeac866", "measure_id": "CA1101", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 52", "description": "Election Day Voter Registration. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.70000076, "percent_no": 59.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed voters to register and vote on Election Day a...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed voters to register and vote on Election Day at polling places, rather than requiring registration at least 15 days before an election. It would have established a system for same-day voter registration and voting at all polling locations statewide.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 52", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_52_(2002)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2002/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2002", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2052%202002", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2052%202002", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 12004, "fingerprint": "2002|200200294|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200294|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "0dfd7f860ae23640", "measure_id": "200200294", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the recommendations of the 1999-2000 Grand Jury relating to salaries of the Board of Supervisors be implemented by amending Article IV, Section 2 of the Charter of Tehama County as follows: \"Notwithstanding any ordinance currently in force, the salary of each member of the Board of Supervisors beginning January 1, 2003, shall be two thousand dollars (2,000.00) per month.  This salary shall be adjusted every two (2) years by an amount equal to the percentage increase identified in the Bureau of Labor Statistics Cost of Living Adjustment (CPI-U), (hereinafter called \"COLA\") For the previous two (2) years, and reviewed every forur (4) years by the Tehama County Grand Jury.  Any recommendation of the Grand Jury to change the salary of members of the Board of Supervisors by an amount greater than that provided by the COLA shall not be implemented except by a vote of the people at the time of general election.\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5763, "no_votes": 8666, "total_votes": 14429, "percent_yes": 39.94039780996604, "percent_no": 60.05960219003396, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.083649", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.217284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.881132", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the recommendations of the 1999-2000 Grand Jury relating to salaries of the Board of Supervisors be implemented by amending Article IV, Section 2 of the Charter of Tehama County as follows: \"Notwithstanding any ordinance currently in force, the salary of each member of the Board of Supervisors beginning January 1, 2003, shall be two thousand dollars (2,000.00) per month.  This salary shall be adjusted every two (2) years by an amount equal to the percentage increase identified in the Bureau of Labor Statistics Cost of Living Adjustment (CPI-U), (hereinafter called \"COLA\") For the previous two (2) years, and reviewed every forur (4) years by the Tehama County Grand Jury.  Any recommendation of the Grand Jury to change the salary of members of the Board of Supervisors by an amount greater than that provided by the COLA shall not be implemented except by a vote of the people at the time of general election.\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9526, "fingerprint": "2002|200200213|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200213|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "75fc5175329d6957", "measure_id": "200200213", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs' construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades, construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 on bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens' Oversight committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8265, "no_votes": 5612, "total_votes": 13877, "percent_yes": 59.55898248901059, "percent_no": 40.44101751098941, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.216947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.880949", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs' construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades, construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 on bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens' Oversight committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9525, "fingerprint": "2002|200200212|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200212|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "85504498b516760a", "measure_id": "200200212", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade elementary schools in Corning, relieve classroom overcrowding, construct a new K-5 school and additions to Olive View School; construct, acquire, repair and equip buildings; upgrade restrooms, cafeterias, electrical, lighting, plumbing systems; qualify for State matching and hardship funds, shall Corning Union Elementary Schoool District issue $2,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen Oversight Committee to perform annual audits, and ensure that no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1358, "no_votes": 999, "total_votes": 2357, "percent_yes": 57.61561306745864, "percent_no": 42.38438693254136, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.216636", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.880769", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade elementary schools in Corning, relieve classroom overcrowding, construct a new K-5 school and additions to Olive View School; construct, acquire, repair and equip buildings; upgrade restrooms, cafeterias, electrical, lighting, plumbing systems; qualify for State matching and hardship funds, shall Corning Union Elementary Schoool District issue $2,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, appoint a Citizen Oversight Committee to perform annual audits, and ensure that no money is used for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9528, "fingerprint": "2002|200200214|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200214|TRINITY", "content_hash": "75fc5175329d6957", "measure_id": "200200214", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs' construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades, construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 on bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens' Oversight committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2702, "no_votes": 1792, "total_votes": 4494, "percent_yes": 60.12461059190031, "percent_no": 39.87538940809969, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.217903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.881497", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center to host university level programs; expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs' construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities; install energy upgrades, construct, renovate, equip science labs, classrooms and college facilities, by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34,000,000 on bonds at legal rates, appointing a Citizens' Oversight committee, performing annual audits, and ensuring that no money is used for salaries and other administrative expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9527, "fingerprint": "2002|200200031|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200031|TRINITY", "content_hash": "d448d98bcb886ede", "measure_id": "200200031", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax provided for in Chapter 3.28 of the Trinity County Code be increased to 10%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1506, "no_votes": 2895, "total_votes": 4401, "percent_yes": 34.219495569188815, "percent_no": 65.78050443081119, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.217625", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.881317", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax provided for in Chapter 3.28 of the Trinity County Code be increased to 10%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9534, "fingerprint": "2002|200200652|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200652|TULARE", "content_hash": "b08106dbd3357a6a", "measure_id": "200200652", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to improve the quality of education, shall the Porterville Unified School Facilities Improvement District be authorized to construct middle and elementary schools to relieve student overcrowding, modernize and renovate existing elementary schools, upgrade electrical systems to provide access to modern technology, make health and safety improvements, and qualify the District to receive $14,200,000 in State matching funds by issuing $23,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a citizens' oversight committee and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3681, "no_votes": 1687, "total_votes": 5368, "percent_yes": 68.57302533532041, "percent_no": 31.42697466467959, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.238409", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.883163", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to improve the quality of education, shall the Porterville Unified School Facilities Improvement District be authorized to construct middle and elementary schools to relieve student overcrowding, modernize and renovate existing elementary schools, upgrade electrical systems to provide access to modern technology, make health and safety improvements, and qualify the District to receive $14,200,000 in State matching funds by issuing $23,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a citizens' oversight committee and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9531, "fingerprint": "2002|200200648|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200648|TULARE", "content_hash": "34e4233fb4173853", "measure_id": "200200648", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, and qualify for $3,374,000 in State matching funds, shall Burton Elementary School District issue $2,455,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance the construction, acquisition and improvement of school facilities and the acquisition of land, as specified in the District's Bond Project List, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures, and no proceeds for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1471, "no_votes": 856, "total_votes": 2327, "percent_yes": 63.21443919209282, "percent_no": 36.78556080790718, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.237170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.882434", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, and qualify for $3,374,000 in State matching funds, shall Burton Elementary School District issue $2,455,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance the construction, acquisition and improvement of school facilities and the acquisition of land, as specified in the District's Bond Project List, with annual audits, a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures, and no proceeds for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12005, "fingerprint": "2002|200200511|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200511|TULARE", "content_hash": "052f4b93dcde31b0", "measure_id": "200200511", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Code pertaining to the charging of a Utility User's Tax be amended to increase the maximum amount of tax for each utility service that a larger utility customer must pay in any calendar year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3703, "no_votes": 2457, "total_votes": 6160, "percent_yes": 60.11363636363637, "percent_no": 39.88636363636363, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.085369", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.236892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.882252", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Code pertaining to the charging of a Utility User's Tax be amended to increase the maximum amount of tax for each utility service that a larger utility customer must pay in any calendar year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9530, "fingerprint": "2002|200200216|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200216|TULARE", "content_hash": "b6cbf098f15459c9", "measure_id": "200200216", "measure_letter": "C-02", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to make the District eligible to receive $6.9 million in state-matching funds, repair and modernize existing schools, replace deteriorating roofs, upgrade electrical systems, construct additional science labs and restrooms, and replace inefficient air conditioning and heating system with energy efficient systems, shall the Lindsay Unified School District issue $7.2 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a citizen oversight committee and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1099, "no_votes": 477, "total_votes": 1576, "percent_yes": 69.73350253807106, "percent_no": 30.266497461928935, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.236618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.882071", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to make the District eligible to receive $6.9 million in state-matching funds, repair and modernize existing schools, replace deteriorating roofs, upgrade electrical systems, construct additional science labs and restrooms, and replace inefficient air conditioning and heating system with energy efficient systems, shall the Lindsay Unified School District issue $7.2 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a citizen oversight committee and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9535, "fingerprint": "2002|200200653|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200653|TULARE", "content_hash": "e205aca4d63e041a", "measure_id": "200200653", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students at Fresno City/Reedley College (Clovis, Madera, Oakhurst Centers) for transfer to four-year colleges and careers, including public safety, firefighting, healthcare technology and business, by upgrading equipment, lighting, wiring, fire safety; replacing portables; repairing plumbing, heating/ventilation; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries, computer labs, buildings, parking, acquiring land, shall State Center Community College District issue $161,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2124, "no_votes": 1968, "total_votes": 4092, "percent_yes": 51.90615835777126, "percent_no": 48.09384164222874, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.238678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.883348", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students at Fresno City/Reedley College (Clovis, Madera, Oakhurst Centers) for transfer to four-year colleges and careers, including public safety, firefighting, healthcare technology and business, by upgrading equipment, lighting, wiring, fire safety; replacing portables; repairing plumbing, heating/ventilation; repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, libraries, computer labs, buildings, parking, acquiring land, shall State Center Community College District issue $161,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, with a Citizens Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9532, "fingerprint": "2002|200200650|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200650|TULARE", "content_hash": "75b57f471c492b9e", "measure_id": "200200650", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students for four-year colleges and jobs in nursing, public safety, and business at Bakersfield, Cerro Coso, and Porterville Colleges by removing hazardous materials, leaky roofs, decaying walls; improving fire safety, lighting, and security systems; upgrading computer technology ; renovating, constructing, equipping/acquiring buildings, classrooms; shall Kern Community College Safety, Repair and Improvement District issue $180 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual fiscal audits, a Citizens Oversight Committee; NO money for administrators salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7404, "no_votes": 5220, "total_votes": 12624, "percent_yes": 58.65019011406845, "percent_no": 41.34980988593155, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.237795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.882800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students for four-year colleges and jobs in nursing, public safety, and business at Bakersfield, Cerro Coso, and Porterville Colleges by removing hazardous materials, leaky roofs, decaying walls; improving fire safety, lighting, and security systems; upgrading computer technology ; renovating, constructing, equipping/acquiring buildings, classrooms; shall Kern Community College Safety, Repair and Improvement District issue $180 million in bonds at legal rates, with annual fiscal audits, a Citizens Oversight Committee; NO money for administrators salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9533, "fingerprint": "2002|200200651|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200651|TULARE", "content_hash": "1deb95fd7fb45611", "measure_id": "200200651", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Linns Valley-Poso Flat Union Elementary School District: Remodel the school kitchen and provide necessary equipment, Purchase and install playground equipment, Refurbish classroom cabinets, counters, and window coverings and upgrade doors to meet current safety and disability standards, by issuing $340,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63, "no_votes": 18, "total_votes": 81, "percent_yes": 77.77777777777779, "percent_no": 22.222222222222214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.238138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.882983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Linns Valley-Poso Flat Union Elementary School District: Remodel the school kitchen and provide necessary equipment, Purchase and install playground equipment, Refurbish classroom cabinets, counters, and window coverings and upgrade doors to meet current safety and disability standards, by issuing $340,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12006, "fingerprint": "2002|200200649|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200649|TULARE", "content_hash": "ecf06fe013f6dcb7", "measure_id": "200200649", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Dinuba Unified School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, expand and upgrade school facilities, including constructing new classrooms and library/media centers, upgrading inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to classroom computers and modern technology, renovate schools and qualify the District to receive $11,400,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $14,915,000 of bonds, with annual audits and oversight by a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2256, "no_votes": 962, "total_votes": 3218, "percent_yes": 70.10565568676196, "percent_no": 29.894344313238037, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.085830", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.237514", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.882614", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Dinuba Unified School District be authorized to modernize classrooms, make health and safety improvements, expand and upgrade school facilities, including constructing new classrooms and library/media centers, upgrading inadequate electrical systems to improve student access to classroom computers and modern technology, renovate schools and qualify the District to receive $11,400,000 in State-matching funds by issuing $14,915,000 of bonds, with annual audits and oversight by a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9529, "fingerprint": "2002|200200215|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200215|TULARE", "content_hash": "14d0fdb4e2251481", "measure_id": "200200215", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding in our schools by acquiring property, building, furnishing, and equipping: a high school in Orange Cove, a small high school in Dunlap, and a food service preparation facility at the District Operations site; shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District, serving our communities' children, issue $18 million of bonds for the above purposes, at legal interest rates, with taxpayer safeguards, citizen oversight, and annual independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143, "no_votes": 169, "total_votes": 312, "percent_yes": 45.83333333333333, "percent_no": 54.16666666666667, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.236295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.881893", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding in our schools by acquiring property, building, furnishing, and equipping: a high school in Orange Cove, a small high school in Dunlap, and a food service preparation facility at the District Operations site; shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District, serving our communities' children, issue $18 million of bonds for the above purposes, at legal interest rates, with taxpayer safeguards, citizen oversight, and annual independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9536, "fingerprint": "2002|200200654|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200654|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "0c226dad6e8a878c", "measure_id": "200200654", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Big Oak Flat-Groveland Unified School District issue $5,750,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to construct and equip a gymnasium/multi-purpose building at both Tioga High School and Don Pedro High School for student and community use, provide improvements and new school facilities at Tenaya Elementary School, Tioga High School and Don Pedro High School, and to qualify for State matching funds, with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1041, "no_votes": 1075, "total_votes": 2116, "percent_yes": 49.19659735349716, "percent_no": 50.80340264650284, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.238997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.883532", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Big Oak Flat-Groveland Unified School District issue $5,750,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to construct and equip a gymnasium/multi-purpose building at both Tioga High School and Don Pedro High School for student and community use, provide improvements and new school facilities at Tenaya Elementary School, Tioga High School and Don Pedro High School, and to qualify for State matching funds, with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9537, "fingerprint": "2002|200200655|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200655|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "20e657ac814020c8", "measure_id": "200200655", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve Soulsbyville School by constructing classrooms and support facilities and acquiring an expansion site; installing infrastructure for classroom technology; rehabilitating existing classrooms and facilities for student health and safety, improving traffic flow/safety, upgrading plumbing, electrical, heating/ventilation systems, fire safety systems; and qualify for $5,270,257 State matching funds; shall Soulsbyville School District issue $1,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and spend no bond funds on salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1057, "no_votes": 484, "total_votes": 1541, "percent_yes": 68.59182349123945, "percent_no": 31.408176508760548, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.239265", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.883719", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve Soulsbyville School by constructing classrooms and support facilities and acquiring an expansion site; installing infrastructure for classroom technology; rehabilitating existing classrooms and facilities for student health and safety, improving traffic flow/safety, upgrading plumbing, electrical, heating/ventilation systems, fire safety systems; and qualify for $5,270,257 State matching funds; shall Soulsbyville School District issue $1,500,000 of bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, citizens' oversight committee and spend no bond funds on salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9544, "fingerprint": "2002|200200514|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200514|VENTURA", "content_hash": "65a0e53618d7fa89", "measure_id": "200200514", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure \"A\" be adopted to amend the Comprehensive Plan, Amend other City land use regulations, approve the Open 80 Master Plan, and approve a Development Agreement that, together, would allow up to 1390 homes to be developed on 730 acres of the Hillside Voter Participation Area north of the City while setting aside approximately 3050 acres of open space in the manner required by the Open 80 Master Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10205, "no_votes": 24264, "total_votes": 34469, "percent_yes": 29.60631291885462, "percent_no": 70.39368708114537, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.241229", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.885000", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure \"A\" be adopted to amend the Comprehensive Plan, Amend other City land use regulations, approve the Open 80 Master Plan, and approve a Development Agreement that, together, would allow up to 1390 homes to be developed on 730 acres of the Hillside Voter Participation Area north of the City while setting aside approximately 3050 acres of open space in the manner required by the Open 80 Master Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9548, "fingerprint": "2002|200200518|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200518|VENTURA", "content_hash": "5c32dd7d8e32db14", "measure_id": "200200518", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"An Initiative Measure to Amend a Voter Approved Initiative Adopted in November of 1998, which established an Urban Boundary Line and Amended the Simi Valley General Plan,\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10285, "no_votes": 18161, "total_votes": 28446, "percent_yes": 36.15622583139984, "percent_no": 63.84377416860016, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.242378", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.885934", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"An Initiative Measure to Amend a Voter Approved Initiative Adopted in November of 1998, which established an Urban Boundary Line and Amended the Simi Valley General Plan,\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9543, "fingerprint": "2002|200200513|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200513|VENTURA", "content_hash": "7ce708f208d8593f", "measure_id": "200200513", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should proposed zone changes and discretionary development projects which cause any adverse traffic impacts on local roadways be denied unless feasible, ascertainable mitigation measures are available and adopted?  The measure excepts single-family dwellings on existing legal lots and City special events.  The measure does not exempt affordable housing.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 900, "no_votes": 1685, "total_votes": 2585, "percent_yes": 34.81624758220503, "percent_no": 65.18375241779498, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.240964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.884817", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should proposed zone changes and discretionary development projects which cause any adverse traffic impacts on local roadways be denied unless feasible, ascertainable mitigation measures are available and adopted?  The measure excepts single-family dwellings on existing legal lots and City special events.  The measure does not exempt affordable housing.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9545, "fingerprint": "2002|200200515|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200515|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e36a39010b3f520a", "measure_id": "200200515", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the members of the legislative body of the City of Santa Paula be elected by districts described in Ordinance No. 1057?  \"Yes\" means elect by districts. \"No\" means retain current citywide election system?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1849, "no_votes": 4130, "total_votes": 5979, "percent_yes": 30.92490383007192, "percent_no": 69.07509616992809, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.241499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.885186", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the members of the legislative body of the City of Santa Paula be elected by districts described in Ordinance No. 1057?  \"Yes\" means elect by districts. \"No\" means retain current citywide election system?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9546, "fingerprint": "2002|200200516|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200516|VENTURA", "content_hash": "f2d5607855b39621", "measure_id": "200200516", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the action of the City Council of the City of Santa Paula in 1994 to increase the transient occupancy tax on temporary occupants of hotels, motels, inns, and the like from 7% to 10% of the rent charged be validated by the electors by a majority vote in favor of this measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3203, "no_votes": 2595, "total_votes": 5798, "percent_yes": 55.24318730596758, "percent_no": 44.75681269403242, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.241775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.885370", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the action of the City Council of the City of Santa Paula in 1994 to increase the transient occupancy tax on temporary occupants of hotels, motels, inns, and the like from 7% to 10% of the rent charged be validated by the electors by a majority vote in favor of this measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9547, "fingerprint": "2002|200200517|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200517|VENTURA", "content_hash": "2dc5f14c0cbe12e9", "measure_id": "200200517", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to change the City of Santa Paula's Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) to include Adams Canyon and an access corridor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2174, "no_votes": 3873, "total_votes": 6047, "percent_yes": 35.95171159252522, "percent_no": 64.04828840747479, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.242108", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.885553", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to change the City of Santa Paula's Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) to include Adams Canyon and an access corridor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9542, "fingerprint": "2002|200200512|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200512|VENTURA", "content_hash": "93868ef466445312", "measure_id": "200200512", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance proposing a special tax of $15.00 per parcel per year, to be used only for maintenance and operation of a swimming pool, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1862, "no_votes": 1156, "total_votes": 3018, "percent_yes": 61.69648774022532, "percent_no": 38.30351225977468, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.240695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.884631", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance proposing a special tax of $15.00 per parcel per year, to be used only for maintenance and operation of a swimming pool, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9549, "fingerprint": "2002|200200656|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200656|VENTURA", "content_hash": "73e4b31653a15b0b", "measure_id": "200200656", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct , rehabilitate, modernize or replace school facilities, including the furnishing and equipping of school facilities or the acquisition of real property for school facilities, and in so doing increase safety and educational effectiveness of classrooms for students, shall the Mesa Union School District issue not to exceed $3,900,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits and in accordance with the actions relating thereto taken by the District's Board of Trustees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 786, "no_votes": 418, "total_votes": 1204, "percent_yes": 65.28239202657808, "percent_no": 34.71760797342192, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.242656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.886358", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct , rehabilitate, modernize or replace school facilities, including the furnishing and equipping of school facilities or the acquisition of real property for school facilities, and in so doing increase safety and educational effectiveness of classrooms for students, shall the Mesa Union School District issue not to exceed $3,900,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits and in accordance with the actions relating thereto taken by the District's Board of Trustees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9539, "fingerprint": "2002|200200107|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200107|VENTURA", "content_hash": "87fb7a9f2b2be4bf", "measure_id": "200200107", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The City Council of the City of Fillmore (\"City\") proposes to purchase the existing swimming pool property, located on the Fillmore High School campus, 555 Central Avenue, Fillmore, California, from the Fillmore Unified School District and construct a new swimming pool on the property.  This purchase and construction of the swimming pool is contingent on the voters of the City authorizing the City Council to adopt an ordinance imposing a special tax of Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) per year per parcel for swimming pool maintenance costs.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1305, "no_votes": 682, "total_votes": 1987, "percent_yes": 65.67689984901862, "percent_no": 34.323100150981375, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.239831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.884084", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The City Council of the City of Fillmore (\"City\") proposes to purchase the existing swimming pool property, located on the Fillmore High School campus, 555 Central Avenue, Fillmore, California, from the Fillmore Unified School District and construct a new swimming pool on the property.  This purchase and construction of the swimming pool is contingent on the voters of the City authorizing the City Council to adopt an ordinance imposing a special tax of Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) per year per parcel for swimming pool maintenance costs.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9540, "fingerprint": "2002|200200217|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200217|VENTURA", "content_hash": "1b0b0e8639c6efc7", "measure_id": "200200217", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to renovate existing schools, upgrade inadequate technological/electrical systems to better access classroom computers, construct new classrooms and a new school to reduce student overcrowding, renovate aging student restrooms, make health and safety improvements, and qualify the District to receive $7,000,000 in State matching funds, shall the Moorpark Unified School District issue $33,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a citizens' oversight committee and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4153, "no_votes": 1843, "total_votes": 5996, "percent_yes": 69.26284189459639, "percent_no": 30.73715810540361, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.240107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.884266", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to renovate existing schools, upgrade inadequate technological/electrical systems to better access classroom computers, construct new classrooms and a new school to reduce student overcrowding, renovate aging student restrooms, make health and safety improvements, and qualify the District to receive $7,000,000 in State matching funds, shall the Moorpark Unified School District issue $33,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, subject to a citizens' oversight committee and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9541, "fingerprint": "2002|200200218|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200218|VENTURA", "content_hash": "ebf69e5620367330", "measure_id": "200200218", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Ventura, Moorpark and Oxnard Community College Repair and Safety Measure. To prepare students for jobs and four year colleges at Ventura, Moorpark, Oxnard Colleges, Education Centers at Camarillo, Conejo, Santa Paula, Simi Valley by repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, laboratories, libraries, sites; replacing deteriorating buildings; upgrading fire safety, plumbing, heating systems, electrical wiring for computer technology; upgrading police/ firefighting/ nursing/ paramedic training centers; shall Ventura County Community College District issue $356,347,814 of bonds, at legal rates, requiring Citizen Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrators'/staff salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 77854, "no_votes": 40861, "total_votes": 118715, "percent_yes": 65.58059217453565, "percent_no": 34.41940782546435, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.240371", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.884446", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Ventura, Moorpark and Oxnard Community College Repair and Safety Measure. To prepare students for jobs and four year colleges at Ventura, Moorpark, Oxnard Colleges, Education Centers at Camarillo, Conejo, Santa Paula, Simi Valley by repairing/constructing/equipping classrooms, laboratories, libraries, sites; replacing deteriorating buildings; upgrading fire safety, plumbing, heating systems, electrical wiring for computer technology; upgrading police/ firefighting/ nursing/ paramedic training centers; shall Ventura County Community College District issue $356,347,814 of bonds, at legal rates, requiring Citizen Oversight Committee, annual financial audits and no money for administrators'/staff salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9538, "fingerprint": "2002|200200032|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200032|VENTURA", "content_hash": "c9bc7381f43c8456", "measure_id": "200200032", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance by the People of the County of Ventura Repealing Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 2001) of Division 2 of the Ventura County Ordinance Code (Section 2 of Ordinance No. 3968) and Adding a New Chapter 1 (Commencing with Sec. 2001) of Division 2 of the Ventura County Ordinance Code Imposing a Uniform Business Tax in the Unincorporated Areas of Ventura County be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59668, "no_votes": 45321, "total_votes": 104989, "percent_yes": 56.83262056024917, "percent_no": 43.16737943975083, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.239532", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.883900", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance by the People of the County of Ventura Repealing Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 2001) of Division 2 of the Ventura County Ordinance Code (Section 2 of Ordinance No. 3968) and Adding a New Chapter 1 (Commencing with Sec. 2001) of Division 2 of the Ventura County Ordinance Code Imposing a Uniform Business Tax in the Unincorporated Areas of Ventura County be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9555, "fingerprint": "2002|200200219|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200219|YOLO", "content_hash": "35a1cf50d41df430", "measure_id": "200200219", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $265 million dollars in bonds at the lowest available interest rate, for building and repairing classrooms and facilities; upgrading academic and vocational education programs including computer sciences, electronics, nursing and high-tech training facilities; upgrading libraries; building new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and making building safety improvements at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College campuses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15183, "no_votes": 5743, "total_votes": 20926, "percent_yes": 72.55567236930135, "percent_no": 27.444327630698652, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.244336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.887758", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Rios Community College District be authorized to issue $265 million dollars in bonds at the lowest available interest rate, for building and repairing classrooms and facilities; upgrading academic and vocational education programs including computer sciences, electronics, nursing and high-tech training facilities; upgrading libraries; building new classrooms to reduce overcrowding, and making building safety improvements at the American River, Consumnes River, El Dorado, Folsom, and Sacramento City College campuses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9556, "fingerprint": "2002|200200220|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200220|YOLO", "content_hash": "76491389836ba89e", "measure_id": "200200220", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and upgrade existing school, shall Pierce Joint Unified School District: Build a new administration/library building and a new classroom building at Johnson Jr. High;Construct and remodel existing relocatables into a new classroom wing at Johnson Jr. High; Modernize Grand Island Elementary; Add a classroom and modernize or replace the Shop Building at Pierce High; and issue $6 million of bonds for the above purposes, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 106, "no_votes": 94, "total_votes": 200, "percent_yes": 53.0, "percent_no": 47.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.244602", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.887988", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and upgrade existing school, shall Pierce Joint Unified School District: Build a new administration/library building and a new classroom building at Johnson Jr. High;Construct and remodel existing relocatables into a new classroom wing at Johnson Jr. High; Modernize Grand Island Elementary; Add a classroom and modernize or replace the Shop Building at Pierce High; and issue $6 million of bonds for the above purposes, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9550, "fingerprint": "2002|200200108|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200108|YOLO", "content_hash": "830b5f0e90532ca7", "measure_id": "200200108", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Park Maintenance Tax Ordinance, which continues funding for city park maintenance by renewing the current parcel tax for four years at the current dwelling units rate of $49 per year and at current non-residential rates (Ordinance No. 2074) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12141, "no_votes": 3208, "total_votes": 15349, "percent_yes": 79.09961561013746, "percent_no": 20.900384389862538, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.242924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.886590", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Park Maintenance Tax Ordinance, which continues funding for city park maintenance by renewing the current parcel tax for four years at the current dwelling units rate of $49 per year and at current non-residential rates (Ordinance No. 2074) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9551, "fingerprint": "2002|200200109|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200109|YOLO", "content_hash": "910caa03d8b61ce5", "measure_id": "200200109", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"G\" is approved and the flood barrier is method of flood protection for Woodland, should the sales tax sunset (expire) on June 30, 2009?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3869, "no_votes": 4672, "total_votes": 8541, "percent_yes": 45.2991452991453, "percent_no": 54.7008547008547, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.243263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.886816", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"G\" is approved and the flood barrier is method of flood protection for Woodland, should the sales tax sunset (expire) on June 30, 2009?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9552, "fingerprint": "2002|200200110|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200110|YOLO", "content_hash": "d02e9a4069e79f22", "measure_id": "200200110", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"G\" is approved and the setback levee is the method of flood protection for Woodland, should the sales tax sunset (expire) on June 30, 2012?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3444, "no_votes": 4950, "total_votes": 8394, "percent_yes": 41.02930664760543, "percent_no": 58.97069335239457, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.243531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.887053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure \"G\" is approved and the setback levee is the method of flood protection for Woodland, should the sales tax sunset (expire) on June 30, 2012?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12007, "fingerprint": "2002|200200657|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200657|YOLO", "content_hash": "41319b4e1461af1b", "measure_id": "200200657", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade 30 year old classrooms, science labs, libraries, electrical wiring, technology, heating/ventilation systems/lighting for student safety; replace portable classrooms; upgrade/repair/acquire/construct/equip science labs, facilities, classrooms and sites; expand/establish facilities in Vacaville/Vallejo; prepare Solano College students for jobs/four-year colleges, shall Solano County Community College District issue $124.5 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform annual audits to ensure the legal/proper use of all funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 894, "no_votes": 781, "total_votes": 1675, "percent_yes": 53.373134328358205, "percent_no": 46.626865671641795, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailF", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.092129", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.245995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.889148", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade 30 year old classrooms, science labs, libraries, electrical wiring, technology, heating/ventilation systems/lighting for student safety; replace portable classrooms; upgrade/repair/acquire/construct/equip science labs, facilities, classrooms and sites; expand/establish facilities in Vacaville/Vallejo; prepare Solano College students for jobs/four-year colleges, shall Solano County Community College District issue $124.5 million of bonds at legal rates, appoint Citizens Oversight Committee, and perform annual audits to ensure the legal/proper use of all funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9553, "fingerprint": "2002|200200111|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200111|YOLO", "content_hash": "e5ef1dbc5c9e52a4", "measure_id": "200200111", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Woodland extend the current one-half cent sales tax for City facilities, services and programs, with the following mandatory restrictions? (a) The current one-half cent sales tax expires June 30, 2006, if approved the sales tax will be extended to and expire not later than June 30, 2012. (b) The citizens shall receive annually a published report of income and expenditures.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2639, "no_votes": 6404, "total_votes": 9043, "percent_yes": 29.18279332080062, "percent_no": 70.81720667919939, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.243799", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.887290", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Woodland extend the current one-half cent sales tax for City facilities, services and programs, with the following mandatory restrictions? (a) The current one-half cent sales tax expires June 30, 2006, if approved the sales tax will be extended to and expire not later than June 30, 2012. (b) The citizens shall receive annually a published report of income and expenditures.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9554, "fingerprint": "2002|200200112|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200112|YOLO", "content_hash": "fee7409e79482c61", "measure_id": "200200112", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 2-1-42 of the Woodland City Code be amended to read as follows: \"Each member of the City Council shall receive a monthly salary of $450\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3921, "no_votes": 4887, "total_votes": 8808, "percent_yes": 44.51634877384196, "percent_no": 55.48365122615804, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-03-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.244063", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.887526", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 2-1-42 of the Woodland City Code be amended to read as follows: \"Each member of the City Council shall receive a monthly salary of $450\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9560, "fingerprint": "2002|200200522|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200522|YOLO", "content_hash": "46be14d3a385c343", "measure_id": "200200522", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 16B of the Woodland City Code, relating to Manufactured Home Space Rent Control, be amended?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6809, "no_votes": 3483, "total_votes": 10292, "percent_yes": 66.15818111154294, "percent_no": 33.841818888457055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.245730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.888920", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 16B of the Woodland City Code, relating to Manufactured Home Space Rent Control, be amended?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9557, "fingerprint": "2002|200200519|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200519|YOLO", "content_hash": "c422f410ffe41559", "measure_id": "200200519", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY) If Measure K is approved, should the proceeds fund the repair and maintenance of city streets, new parks and community facilities, library services, after-school programs, childcare and senior facilities, expanded police and fire protection and reductions in utility bills and property tax assessments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6964, "no_votes": 1494, "total_votes": 8458, "percent_yes": 82.33624970442185, "percent_no": 17.663750295578154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.244903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.888231", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY) If Measure K is approved, should the proceeds fund the repair and maintenance of city streets, new parks and community facilities, library services, after-school programs, childcare and senior facilities, expanded police and fire protection and reductions in utility bills and property tax assessments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9558, "fingerprint": "2002|200200520|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200520|YOLO", "content_hash": "080fc2fc2abfdca4", "measure_id": "200200520", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of West Sacramento enact a one-half cent sales tax for general government purposes including but not limited to community facilities and programs, with the following mandatory restrictions: One-fourth cent of this sales tax will expire after ten years on March 31, 2013; The citizens shall receive annually a published report of revenue and disbursements following a public hearing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5460, "no_votes": 3005, "total_votes": 8465, "percent_yes": 64.50088600118133, "percent_no": 35.49911399881867, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.245198", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.888459", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of West Sacramento enact a one-half cent sales tax for general government purposes including but not limited to community facilities and programs, with the following mandatory restrictions: One-fourth cent of this sales tax will expire after ten years on March 31, 2013; The citizens shall receive annually a published report of revenue and disbursements following a public hearing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9559, "fingerprint": "2002|200200521|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200521|YOLO", "content_hash": "32d92e4a50c92704", "measure_id": "200200521", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance proposed by the initiative measure entitled Southport and Port of Sacramento General Plan and Zoning Initiative, rezoning the Southport Area and Port of Sacramento and establishing a policy to minimize industrial uses city-wide be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2527, "no_votes": 6048, "total_votes": 8575, "percent_yes": 29.46938775510204, "percent_no": 70.53061224489795, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.245463", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.888692", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance proposed by the initiative measure entitled Southport and Port of Sacramento General Plan and Zoning Initiative, rezoning the Southport Area and Port of Sacramento and establishing a policy to minimize industrial uses city-wide be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9561, "fingerprint": "2002|200200295|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2002|200200295|YUBA", "content_hash": "fc81cb1badad2458", "measure_id": "200200295", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2002, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Enacts a ten percent (10%) surcharge upon persons temporarily occupying hotels, motels, and similar lodging facilities in the unincorporated area of Yuba County.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4242, "no_votes": 3884, "total_votes": 8126, "percent_yes": 52.20280580851588, "percent_no": 47.79719419148412, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2002-11-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.246294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.889350", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Enacts a ten percent (10%) surcharge upon persons temporarily occupying hotels, motels, and similar lodging facilities in the unincorporated area of Yuba County.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12008, "fingerprint": "2001|200100101|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100101|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "bf118e85750542d3", "measure_id": "200100101", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "(Recall) Shall Michael I Cerny be recalled (removed) from office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 277, "no_votes": 91, "total_votes": 368, "percent_yes": 75.27173913043478, "percent_no": 24.72826086956522, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-10-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.093536", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.248208", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.890445", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Recall) Shall Michael I Cerny be recalled (removed) from office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9564, "fingerprint": "2001|200100093|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100093|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1ccf9a3271602e05", "measure_id": "200100093", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "(Recall) Shall Gladys Vance be recalled (removed) from office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 747, "no_votes": 78, "total_votes": 825, "percent_yes": 90.54545454545456, "percent_no": 9.454545454545439, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-08-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.247370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.889910", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Recall) Shall Gladys Vance be recalled (removed) from office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9565, "fingerprint": "2001|200100094|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100094|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ad19000ea1dbe150", "measure_id": "200100094", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "(Recall) Shall Barbara Krzywicki be recalled (removed) from office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 708, "no_votes": 115, "total_votes": 823, "percent_yes": 86.02673147023087, "percent_no": 13.973268529769129, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-08-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.247671", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.890089", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Recall) Shall Barbara Krzywicki be recalled (removed) from office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9566, "fingerprint": "2001|200100095|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100095|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8b0fda37b631371f", "measure_id": "200100095", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "(Recall) Shall Donald Dorsey be recalled (removed) from office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 731, "no_votes": 86, "total_votes": 817, "percent_yes": 89.47368421052632, "percent_no": 10.526315789473685, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-08-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.247933", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.890267", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Recall) Shall Donald Dorsey be recalled (removed) from office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12009, "fingerprint": "2001|200100186|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100186|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e6620c927be8a801", "measure_id": "200100186", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To retain and recruit quality teachers and staff, to avoid further reductions in essential educational programs, to avoid increases in class sizes and to maintain the quality of education in Alameda schools, shall the Alameda Unified School District be authorized to levy, for 5 years only. a tax of $109 per parcel, to provide an exemption to the principal residence of persons 65 years of age or over, and appoint a District Fiscal Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10008, "no_votes": 4023, "total_votes": 14031, "percent_yes": 71.3277742142399, "percent_no": 28.672225785760105, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.094540", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.249674", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.891359", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To retain and recruit quality teachers and staff, to avoid further reductions in essential educational programs, to avoid increases in class sizes and to maintain the quality of education in Alameda schools, shall the Alameda Unified School District be authorized to levy, for 5 years only. a tax of $109 per parcel, to provide an exemption to the principal residence of persons 65 years of age or over, and appoint a District Fiscal Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9562, "fingerprint": "2001|200100027|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100027|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f9ba8ac73d5feefe", "measure_id": "200100027", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain the quality of Piedmont's public education by providing continued support for special instructional programs and services, lower class sizes, technology, and maintenance services commensurate with a superior educational program, shall the Piedmont City Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of up to the amounts specified in the voter information pamphlet for a period of five years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2618, "no_votes": 705, "total_votes": 3323, "percent_yes": 78.78423111646103, "percent_no": 21.21576888353897, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.246674", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.889541", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain the quality of Piedmont's public education by providing continued support for special instructional programs and services, lower class sizes, technology, and maintenance services commensurate with a superior educational program, shall the Piedmont City Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of up to the amounts specified in the voter information pamphlet for a period of five years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12010, "fingerprint": "2001|200100187|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100187|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "13a43b3c00179522", "measure_id": "200100187", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce class sizes, improve teacher salaries, purchase textbooks and materials, improve math, science, fine arts programs and libraries, improve safety and provide resources for underachieving students in district programs, provide job training, with no money used for administrative costs, shall Oakland Unified School District be authorized to increase the existing $75 annual parcel tax by $4 per month to $123 annually for a period of 5 years, with an exemption for qualified low-income parcel owners?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24865, "no_votes": 6615, "total_votes": 31480, "percent_yes": 78.9866581956798, "percent_no": 21.013341804320206, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.094737", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.249943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.891540", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce class sizes, improve teacher salaries, purchase textbooks and materials, improve math, science, fine arts programs and libraries, improve safety and provide resources for underachieving students in district programs, provide job training, with no money used for administrative costs, shall Oakland Unified School District be authorized to increase the existing $75 annual parcel tax by $4 per month to $123 annually for a period of 5 years, with an exemption for qualified low-income parcel owners?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9563, "fingerprint": "2001|200100028|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100028|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c933f2edf61ce766", "measure_id": "200100028", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to enhance the quality of Piedmont's public education by providing additional support of technology, student support services, and curriculum development and professional training, shall the Piedmont City Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of up to the amounts specified in the voter information pamphlet for a period of five (5) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2519, "no_votes": 809, "total_votes": 3328, "percent_yes": 75.69110576923077, "percent_no": 24.308894230769226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.247069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.889728", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to enhance the quality of Piedmont's public education by providing additional support of technology, student support services, and curriculum development and professional training, shall the Piedmont City Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of up to the amounts specified in the voter information pamphlet for a period of five (5) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9567, "fingerprint": "2001|200100125|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100125|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "dc789b10f3bfb6b9", "measure_id": "200100125", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you vote to adopt a City Council Proposed Charter Amendment, as recommended by the Charter Review Committee, to change the elected Chief of Police position to an appointed position, the exact wording of which is set forth in the voter pamphlet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1405, "no_votes": 999, "total_votes": 2404, "percent_yes": 58.44425956738769, "percent_no": 41.55574043261231, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.248532", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.890623", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you vote to adopt a City Council Proposed Charter Amendment, as recommended by the Charter Review Committee, to change the elected Chief of Police position to an appointed position, the exact wording of which is set forth in the voter pamphlet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9568, "fingerprint": "2001|200100126|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100126|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "44d41dbf71556105", "measure_id": "200100126", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Emeryville increase the uniform transient occupancy tax imposed on transients from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) of the rent charged by the lodging service operator, such as hotels and motels, in order to provide for general municipal services in the City of Emeryville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 401, "no_votes": 206, "total_votes": 607, "percent_yes": 66.06260296540363, "percent_no": 33.93739703459637, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.248802", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.890818", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Emeryville increase the uniform transient occupancy tax imposed on transients from ten percent (10%) to twelve percent (12%) of the rent charged by the lodging service operator, such as hotels and motels, in order to provide for general municipal services in the City of Emeryville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9569, "fingerprint": "2001|200100127|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100127|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b5fac8716824651e", "measure_id": "200100127", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to provide for general municipal services in the City of Emeryville, shall the City of Emeryville revise the business license tax imposed on persons engaged in the business of operating a lodging service, such as hotels and motels, in an amount of twelve percent (12%) of gross receipts per quarter attributable to rent collected from customers of a lodging service, excluding gross receipts of a lodging service business attributable to rent collected from a transient upon which the lodging service business also collects from the transient and pays to the City of Emeryville a tax in accordance with the Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax Law of the City of Emeryville, plus eight-one hundredths of one percent (0.08%) of all other gross receipts of a lodging service business?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 379, "no_votes": 220, "total_votes": 599, "percent_yes": 63.272120200333895, "percent_no": 36.727879799666105, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.249100", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.890999", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide for general municipal services in the City of Emeryville, shall the City of Emeryville revise the business license tax imposed on persons engaged in the business of operating a lodging service, such as hotels and motels, in an amount of twelve percent (12%) of gross receipts per quarter attributable to rent collected from customers of a lodging service, excluding gross receipts of a lodging service business attributable to rent collected from a transient upon which the lodging service business also collects from the transient and pays to the City of Emeryville a tax in accordance with the Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax Law of the City of Emeryville, plus eight-one hundredths of one percent (0.08%) of all other gross receipts of a lodging service business?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9570, "fingerprint": "2001|200100128|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100128|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "17b1efb2dba1346c", "measure_id": "200100128", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Newark increase the hotel/motel tax imposed on travelers from 7.5% to 10% of the daily room rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2389, "no_votes": 1458, "total_votes": 3847, "percent_yes": 62.10033792565636, "percent_no": 37.89966207434364, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.249395", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.891181", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Newark increase the hotel/motel tax imposed on travelers from 7.5% to 10% of the daily room rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9571, "fingerprint": "2001|200100064|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100064|BUTTE", "content_hash": "54cc4532b066f62e", "measure_id": "200100064", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chico be amended to allow construction of Otterson Drive improvements extending to the intersection of Park Avenue and East Park Avenue, which includes the purchase and preservation for public use of creekside greenway adjacent to the proposed bridge and road extension, as set forth in City Council Resolution No. 42 00-01", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4548, "no_votes": 5502, "total_votes": 10050, "percent_yes": 45.25373134328358, "percent_no": 54.74626865671642, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.250216", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.891728", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chico be amended to allow construction of Otterson Drive improvements extending to the intersection of Park Avenue and East Park Avenue, which includes the purchase and preservation for public use of creekside greenway adjacent to the proposed bridge and road extension, as set forth in City Council Resolution No. 42 00-01", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9577, "fingerprint": "2001|200100030|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100030|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5d31f8359d2a4eb1", "measure_id": "200100030", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prevent overcrowding at both liberty High School and Freedom High School by building a third high school, to complete construction projects at Freedom High School, and to make needed repairs at Liberty High School, shall the Liberty Union High School District issue $40,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5100, "no_votes": 1960, "total_votes": 7060, "percent_yes": 72.23796033994334, "percent_no": 27.762039660056658, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.252314", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.892980", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prevent overcrowding at both liberty High School and Freedom High School by building a third high school, to complete construction projects at Freedom High School, and to make needed repairs at Liberty High School, shall the Liberty Union High School District issue $40,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9576, "fingerprint": "2001|200100029|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100029|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7d463a108c355223", "measure_id": "200100029", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To avoid the loss of student access to quality teaching, college preparatory classes, electives, honors and other academic courses, student technology and support services, shall the Acalanes Union High School District's Qualified Special Tax be reauthorized at a rate of $85 / year per taxable parcel for six years beginning July 1, 2001, with a  complete exemption available on application for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24177, "no_votes": 8402, "total_votes": 32579, "percent_yes": 74.21038092022468, "percent_no": 25.78961907977532, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.252014", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.892798", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To avoid the loss of student access to quality teaching, college preparatory classes, electives, honors and other academic courses, student technology and support services, shall the Acalanes Union High School District's Qualified Special Tax be reauthorized at a rate of $85 / year per taxable parcel for six years beginning July 1, 2001, with a  complete exemption available on application for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9578, "fingerprint": "2001|200100031|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100031|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "745d04433381e47b", "measure_id": "200100031", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce class size in grades 4 through 8, to enhance the academic performance of all students and for additional support for math, science and fine arts classes, shall the Walnut Creek School District be authorized to levy a special tax assessment on each assessor's parcel of $41 per year for a period of eight years, beginning July 2001, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the resolution and Order of Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8161, "no_votes": 4034, "total_votes": 12195, "percent_yes": 66.9208692086921, "percent_no": 33.079130791307904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.252586", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.893165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce class size in grades 4 through 8, to enhance the academic performance of all students and for additional support for math, science and fine arts classes, shall the Walnut Creek School District be authorized to levy a special tax assessment on each assessor's parcel of $41 per year for a period of eight years, beginning July 2001, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the resolution and Order of Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9572, "fingerprint": "2001|200100003|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100003|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "43aa334c206e0f77", "measure_id": "200100003", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2000-38 of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County be approved so as to authorize an increase in the special tax on property located in County Service Area P-5 from $150 per parcel per year to $330 per parcel per year, for all parcels except those used for commercial recreational purposes which shall continue to be taxed at a higher rate, in order to provide additional funding for police protection service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 632, "no_votes": 157, "total_votes": 789, "percent_yes": 80.10139416983523, "percent_no": 19.89860583016477, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.250483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.891913", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2000-38 of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County be approved so as to authorize an increase in the special tax on property located in County Service Area P-5 from $150 per parcel per year to $330 per parcel per year, for all parcels except those used for commercial recreational purposes which shall continue to be taxed at a higher rate, in order to provide additional funding for police protection service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9573, "fingerprint": "2001|200100009|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100009|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2f286d0d2de0f03d", "measure_id": "200100009", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance increasing the Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax to ten percent (10%) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1721, "no_votes": 1337, "total_votes": 3058, "percent_yes": 56.27861347285808, "percent_no": 43.72138652714192, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.251006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.892188", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance increasing the Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax to ten percent (10%) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9574, "fingerprint": "2001|200100010|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100010|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "2fa4447e943e2ffa", "measure_id": "200100010", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance add Chapter 8 To Title X of the Hercules Municipal Code Establishing an Admission tax on Sporting and Entertainment Events in the City of Hercules?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1811, "no_votes": 1256, "total_votes": 3067, "percent_yes": 59.04792957287251, "percent_no": 40.95207042712749, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.251374", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.892384", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance add Chapter 8 To Title X of the Hercules Municipal Code Establishing an Admission tax on Sporting and Entertainment Events in the City of Hercules?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9575, "fingerprint": "2001|200100011|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100011|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d90c5826d159a5b7", "measure_id": "200100011", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(Advisory) Shall the people of the City of Hercules secede from the West Contra Costa Unified School District and form a new school district or merge with an adjoining school district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1395, "no_votes": 1815, "total_votes": 3210, "percent_yes": 43.45794392523364, "percent_no": 56.54205607476636, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:35", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.251653", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.892603", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Advisory) Shall the people of the City of Hercules secede from the West Contra Costa Unified School District and form a new school district or merge with an adjoining school district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9579, "fingerprint": "2001|200100065|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100065|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "0ab6891bc4074e0b", "measure_id": "200100065", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To restore and improve Orinda's library services by increasing the hours the library is open; replacing worn and outdated books, materials and equipment; maintaining reading and educational programs for children and services for adults, students and seniors, shall the City of Orinda be authorized to collect a qualified special tax not to exceed $27 per year per residential parcel or equivalent unit beginning July 1, 2001 for Orinda library services and expiring after eight years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4253, "no_votes": 1374, "total_votes": 5627, "percent_yes": 75.58201528345478, "percent_no": 24.41798471654522, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.252891", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.893349", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To restore and improve Orinda's library services by increasing the hours the library is open; replacing worn and outdated books, materials and equipment; maintaining reading and educational programs for children and services for adults, students and seniors, shall the City of Orinda be authorized to collect a qualified special tax not to exceed $27 per year per residential parcel or equivalent unit beginning July 1, 2001 for Orinda library services and expiring after eight years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9580, "fingerprint": "2001|200100129|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100129|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b6305d3ffe1f883a", "measure_id": "200100129", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Brentwood be authorized to issue General Obligation Bonds in the amount of six million dollars ($6,000,000) principal amount to finance the construction, acquisition, and improvement of a new Police Station, and all costs incident thereto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2132, "no_votes": 754, "total_votes": 2886, "percent_yes": 73.87387387387388, "percent_no": 26.126126126126124, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.253257", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.893533", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Brentwood be authorized to issue General Obligation Bonds in the amount of six million dollars ($6,000,000) principal amount to finance the construction, acquisition, and improvement of a new Police Station, and all costs incident thereto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9583, "fingerprint": "2001|200100132|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100132|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "118159ffce413604", "measure_id": "200100132", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article II and III of the City of San Ramon Charter be amended: a) to provide direct election of the Mayor to a two-year term commencing at the next municipal election; b) to establish term limits of four two-year terms or eight years total; c) to prescribe the duties of the Mayor as those existing on January 1,2001, and d) to set the Mayor's compensation at $100 per month more than that of a Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4261, "no_votes": 1349, "total_votes": 5610, "percent_yes": 75.9536541889483, "percent_no": 24.046345811051694, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.254063", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.894085", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article II and III of the City of San Ramon Charter be amended: a) to provide direct election of the Mayor to a two-year term commencing at the next municipal election; b) to establish term limits of four two-year terms or eight years total; c) to prescribe the duties of the Mayor as those existing on January 1,2001, and d) to set the Mayor's compensation at $100 per month more than that of a Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9581, "fingerprint": "2001|200100130|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100130|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8c064681f8dab81d", "measure_id": "200100130", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 3 of Article III and Section 3 of Article III-A of the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to change the election dates for the Mayor and Councilmembers from November in odd-numbered years to November in even-numbered years commencing in November 2004, and increasing by one year the terms of the Mayor and City Councilmembers who are in office after the November, 2001 election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6000, "no_votes": 6402, "total_votes": 12402, "percent_yes": 48.37929366231253, "percent_no": 51.62070633768747, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.253526", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.893720", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 3 of Article III and Section 3 of Article III-A of the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to change the election dates for the Mayor and Councilmembers from November in odd-numbered years to November in even-numbered years commencing in November 2004, and increasing by one year the terms of the Mayor and City Councilmembers who are in office after the November, 2001 election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9582, "fingerprint": "2001|200100131|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100131|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "479ae63d4346dec3", "measure_id": "200100131", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance levying an annual parcel tax of (1) $19.80 for single-family residential dwelling units, (2) $19.80 for the first unit and $14.85 for each unit thereafter for multiple-family residential dwelling units, and (3) $39.60 for non-residential parcels, which will be levied in each of eight consecutive fiscal years in order to provide additional funds for the maintenance and operations of the Richmond Public Library, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6163, "no_votes": 6538, "total_votes": 12701, "percent_yes": 48.52373828832375, "percent_no": 51.47626171167625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.253797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.893905", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance levying an annual parcel tax of (1) $19.80 for single-family residential dwelling units, (2) $19.80 for the first unit and $14.85 for each unit thereafter for multiple-family residential dwelling units, and (3) $39.60 for non-residential parcels, which will be levied in each of eight consecutive fiscal years in order to provide additional funds for the maintenance and operations of the Richmond Public Library, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9584, "fingerprint": "2001|200100032|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100032|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "3621af92b0b0e414", "measure_id": "200100032", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the TTUSD continue to levy a special tax of $80 per year per assessor's parcel (equivalent to less than $7 per month) limited to four years beginning July 1, 2001 for classroom supplies and materials, vocational education, academic programs, music, computers and technology support, lower 4th and 5th grade class size, nursing, physical education, bus replacement fund, playground and field maintenance, librarians, and elementary school counseling, described in Resolution #13-00/01; shall the district appropriations limit be increased accordingly; shall a Citizens Review Committee monitor these funds; and shall exemptions be available for all taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 155, "no_votes": 88, "total_votes": 243, "percent_yes": 63.78600823045267, "percent_no": 36.21399176954733, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.254329", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.894270", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the TTUSD continue to levy a special tax of $80 per year per assessor's parcel (equivalent to less than $7 per month) limited to four years beginning July 1, 2001 for classroom supplies and materials, vocational education, academic programs, music, computers and technology support, lower 4th and 5th grade class size, nursing, physical education, bus replacement fund, playground and field maintenance, librarians, and elementary school counseling, described in Resolution #13-00/01; shall the district appropriations limit be increased accordingly; shall a Citizens Review Committee monitor these funds; and shall exemptions be available for all taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9587, "fingerprint": "2001|200100089|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100089|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a16199bd7b3ddee3", "measure_id": "200100089", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Darryl Nelum be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the governing board of West Fresno Elementary School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 176, "no_votes": 21, "total_votes": 197, "percent_yes": 89.34010152284264, "percent_no": 10.659898477157356, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-07-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.255266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.894828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Darryl Nelum be recalled (removed) from the office of member of the governing board of West Fresno Elementary School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9585, "fingerprint": "2001|200100033|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100033|FRESNO", "content_hash": "a972026d44468bf7", "measure_id": "200100033", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize existing schools, upgrade safety systems, enhance technology capabilities and reduce overcrowding, shall Clovis Unified School District: build library/media centers; renovate existing school facilities; construct new elementary schools; prepare plans for a new intermediate and high school; acquire, construct, furnish and equip new school and District facilities, including new sites and site improvements at existing campuses, and issue $79 million of bonds for the above purposes, at interest rates within the legal limit?  If Measure A is approved by the voters, the Board of Trustees of the District will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual independent audits to assure that funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12839, "no_votes": 7093, "total_votes": 19932, "percent_yes": 64.41400762592816, "percent_no": 35.585992374071836, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.254695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.894455", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize existing schools, upgrade safety systems, enhance technology capabilities and reduce overcrowding, shall Clovis Unified School District: build library/media centers; renovate existing school facilities; construct new elementary schools; prepare plans for a new intermediate and high school; acquire, construct, furnish and equip new school and District facilities, including new sites and site improvements at existing campuses, and issue $79 million of bonds for the above purposes, at interest rates within the legal limit?  If Measure A is approved by the voters, the Board of Trustees of the District will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual independent audits to assure that funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9586, "fingerprint": "2001|200100034|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100034|FRESNO", "content_hash": "efcf8aaaff425664", "measure_id": "200100034", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Fresno Unified School District: reduce overcrowding by building new classrooms/schools; make the District eligible for State matching funds; acquire school technology and hardware; repair plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems; renovate and modernize deteriorating classrooms; build library/media centers; upgrade classroom electrical wiring for computers; repair, rehabilitate, construct and acquire educational facilities and related property; and issue $199 million of bonds for the above purposes, at interest rates within the legal limit?  If Measure K is approved by the voters, the Board of Trustees of the District will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual independent audits to assure that funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19864, "no_votes": 9678, "total_votes": 29542, "percent_yes": 67.23986189154424, "percent_no": 32.76013810845576, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.254997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.894638", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Fresno Unified School District: reduce overcrowding by building new classrooms/schools; make the District eligible for State matching funds; acquire school technology and hardware; repair plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems; renovate and modernize deteriorating classrooms; build library/media centers; upgrade classroom electrical wiring for computers; repair, rehabilitate, construct and acquire educational facilities and related property; and issue $199 million of bonds for the above purposes, at interest rates within the legal limit?  If Measure K is approved by the voters, the Board of Trustees of the District will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual independent audits to assure that funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9589, "fingerprint": "2001|200100189|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100189|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "35bf52c11dd731b2", "measure_id": "200100189", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center and establish a four-year college program, expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs and construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities, install energy upgrades, upgrade science labs and construct and renovate classrooms and college facilities by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34 million of bonds at legal interest rates with citizens oversight and financial accountability?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6, "no_votes": 5, "total_votes": 11, "percent_yes": 54.54545454545454, "percent_no": 45.45454545454546, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.255857", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.895189", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center and establish a four-year college program, expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs and construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities, install energy upgrades, upgrade science labs and construct and renovate classrooms and college facilities by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34 million of bonds at legal interest rates with citizens oversight and financial accountability?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9588, "fingerprint": "2001|200100188|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100188|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "2f11bb11367ad114", "measure_id": "200100188", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct school facilities and remove safety hazards, shall the Peninsula Union Elementary School/District incur bonded indebtedness of $600,000 at interest rates within legal limits, for school improvement purposes including: Modernizing schools for computer technology including a new library/media center; Removing asbestos, repairing roofs and improving earthquake safety; Improving playgrounds; Upgrading security, fire, and safety systems including outdoor lighting; Building a meeting room for community and school use and; Building a bus garage/shop at the school site.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47, "no_votes": 29, "total_votes": 76, "percent_yes": 61.8421052631579, "percent_no": 38.1578947368421, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.255536", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.895007", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct school facilities and remove safety hazards, shall the Peninsula Union Elementary School/District incur bonded indebtedness of $600,000 at interest rates within legal limits, for school improvement purposes including: Modernizing schools for computer technology including a new library/media center; Removing asbestos, repairing roofs and improving earthquake safety; Improving playgrounds; Upgrading security, fire, and safety systems including outdoor lighting; Building a meeting room for community and school use and; Building a bus garage/shop at the school site.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9590, "fingerprint": "2001|200100002|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100002|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "26ddbfab96969e71", "measure_id": "200100002", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall LA RUE DEPPE NELSON be recalled (removed) from the Office of Board of Trustees, San Pasqual Valley Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55, "no_votes": 117, "total_votes": 172, "percent_yes": 31.976744186046503, "percent_no": 68.0232558139535, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-02-27", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.256132", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.895375", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall LA RUE DEPPE NELSON be recalled (removed) from the Office of Board of Trustees, San Pasqual Valley Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12011, "fingerprint": "2001|200100233|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100233|KERN", "content_hash": "0d0bdbc9ba146f77", "measure_id": "200100233", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Cliff Thompson be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 673, "no_votes": 645, "total_votes": 1318, "percent_yes": 51.062215477996965, "percent_no": 48.937784522003035, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-12-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.102430", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.258995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.897238", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Cliff Thompson be recalled (removed) from the office of Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9594, "fingerprint": "2001|200100059|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100059|KERN", "content_hash": "4bbf6cfbfc93ff9a", "measure_id": "200100059", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Michael P. Bean be recalled (removed) from the office of the Director?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 109, "no_votes": 98, "total_votes": 207, "percent_yes": 52.6570048309179, "percent_no": 47.3429951690821, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.257378", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.896142", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Michael P. Bean be recalled (removed) from the office of the Director?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9595, "fingerprint": "2001|200100060|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100060|KERN", "content_hash": "473441db91edfd36", "measure_id": "200100060", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Raymond Limesand be recalled (removed) for the office of Director?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 128, "no_votes": 84, "total_votes": 212, "percent_yes": 60.37735849056604, "percent_no": 39.62264150943396, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.257650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.896322", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Raymond Limesand be recalled (removed) for the office of Director?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9596, "fingerprint": "2001|200100061|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100061|KERN", "content_hash": "5483603f1689cd3c", "measure_id": "200100061", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Duain J. Nelson be recalled (removed) for the office of Director?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 122, "no_votes": 84, "total_votes": 206, "percent_yes": 59.22330097087378, "percent_no": 40.77669902912622, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.257926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.896501", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Duain J. Nelson be recalled (removed) for the office of Director?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9591, "fingerprint": "2001|200100035|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100035|KERN", "content_hash": "fd0f17b198fb14ac", "measure_id": "200100035", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue bonds not to exceed $12,000,000 for the pupose of acquiring real property for, and financing the construction of, a new high school and a new elementray school in California City, with bonds sold at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 882, "no_votes": 507, "total_votes": 1389, "percent_yes": 63.498920086393085, "percent_no": 36.501079913606915, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.256465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.895558", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mojave Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 issue bonds not to exceed $12,000,000 for the pupose of acquiring real property for, and financing the construction of, a new high school and a new elementray school in California City, with bonds sold at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9592, "fingerprint": "2001|200100036|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100036|KERN", "content_hash": "9c2721c3a38044be", "measure_id": "200100036", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain existing school programs, improve the quality of education, and to provide funds to modernize and update school facilities, shall the Mojave Unified School District levy an annual parcel tax in the amount of $25.50 for no more than ten years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1146, "no_votes": 686, "total_votes": 1832, "percent_yes": 62.55458515283843, "percent_no": 37.44541484716157, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.256786", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.895766", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain existing school programs, improve the quality of education, and to provide funds to modernize and update school facilities, shall the Mojave Unified School District levy an annual parcel tax in the amount of $25.50 for no more than ten years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9597, "fingerprint": "2001|200100066|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100066|KERN", "content_hash": "bfa61391f7d54832", "measure_id": "200100066", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special tax of $75.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of three (3) fiscal years beginning July 1, 2001?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1160, "no_votes": 454, "total_votes": 1614, "percent_yes": 71.87112763320943, "percent_no": 28.128872366790574, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.258191", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.896692", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax of $75.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of three (3) fiscal years beginning July 1, 2001?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9593, "fingerprint": "2001|200100058|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100058|KERN", "content_hash": "f258b24a32f79d55", "measure_id": "200100058", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Bear Valley Community Services District be authorized to levy an annual special tax in the maximum amount of $95.00 on each parcel of land within the boundaries of the District? The revenues from the special tax shall be used only for the limited purposes of paying the costs and expenses of constructing, opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing and maintaining, in whole or part, of any road in the District, including the installation and maintenance of recessed reflectors and similar safety measures, and to pay the costs and expenses of restricting access to the District's roads to landowners and residents of the District. The annual special tax shall not be increased above $95.00 on each parcel without a two-thirds vote of the voters in the District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 516, "no_votes": 935, "total_votes": 1451, "percent_yes": 35.56168159889731, "percent_no": 64.43831840110269, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.257056", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.895957", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bear Valley Community Services District be authorized to levy an annual special tax in the maximum amount of $95.00 on each parcel of land within the boundaries of the District? The revenues from the special tax shall be used only for the limited purposes of paying the costs and expenses of constructing, opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing and maintaining, in whole or part, of any road in the District, including the installation and maintenance of recessed reflectors and similar safety measures, and to pay the costs and expenses of restricting access to the District's roads to landowners and residents of the District. The annual special tax shall not be increased above $95.00 on each parcel without a two-thirds vote of the voters in the District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9598, "fingerprint": "2001|200100072|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100072|KERN", "content_hash": "748b31717ca2b50b", "measure_id": "200100072", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Taft City (Elementary) School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and modernize K-8 school facilities, replace 30 year roofs and HVAC systems, upgrade electrical systems to accommodate computers and modern technology, remove asbestos, replace deteriorated plumbing and sewers, and make the District eligible to receive up to $4,000,000 in state-matching funds, by issuing $20,000,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1488, "no_votes": 356, "total_votes": 1844, "percent_yes": 80.6941431670282, "percent_no": 19.3058568329718, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.258457", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.896875", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Taft City (Elementary) School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and modernize K-8 school facilities, replace 30 year roofs and HVAC systems, upgrade electrical systems to accommodate computers and modern technology, remove asbestos, replace deteriorated plumbing and sewers, and make the District eligible to receive up to $4,000,000 in state-matching funds, by issuing $20,000,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9599, "fingerprint": "2001|200100073|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100073|KERN", "content_hash": "cd755b7703fa48e4", "measure_id": "200100073", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to improve the quality of education, shall the Wasco Union Elementary School District acquire, construct, and modernize school facilities, build additional permanent classrooms and support facilities, construct a new elementary school to reduce student overcrowding, modernize schools throughout the District to accommodate computers and modern technology, make the District eligible to receive over $6,600,000 in state-matching funds, and issue $6,600,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1229, "no_votes": 413, "total_votes": 1642, "percent_yes": 74.8477466504263, "percent_no": 25.152253349573698, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.258727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.897057", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to improve the quality of education, shall the Wasco Union Elementary School District acquire, construct, and modernize school facilities, build additional permanent classrooms and support facilities, construct a new elementary school to reduce student overcrowding, modernize schools throughout the District to accommodate computers and modern technology, make the District eligible to receive over $6,600,000 in state-matching funds, and issue $6,600,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9602, "fingerprint": "2001|200100012|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100012|KINGS", "content_hash": "ea89b2422282ed35", "measure_id": "200100012", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(Recall) Shall Joan Garcia-Munoz be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member of the City of Corcoran?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 927, "no_votes": 105, "total_votes": 1032, "percent_yes": 89.82558139534885, "percent_no": 10.174418604651152, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.259887", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.897789", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Recall) Shall Joan Garcia-Munoz be recalled (removed) from the office of Council Member of the City of Corcoran?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9600, "fingerprint": "2001|200100004|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100004|KINGS", "content_hash": "b2b2d653f915f535", "measure_id": "200100004", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(Advisory) Shall any new voter-approved sales taxes be used to pay for the following criminal-justice improvements? Expanded jail facilities to keep criminals behind bars. Increased Juvenile Hall capacity to hold juveniles and gang members accountable for criminal acts. Expanded juvenile programs, including the boot camp, to rehabilitate juvenile offenders. Improved Sheriff's operations facilities in aide of law enforcement.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5209, "no_votes": 3273, "total_votes": 8482, "percent_yes": 61.41240273520396, "percent_no": 38.58759726479604, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.259267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.897418", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Advisory) Shall any new voter-approved sales taxes be used to pay for the following criminal-justice improvements? Expanded jail facilities to keep criminals behind bars. Increased Juvenile Hall capacity to hold juveniles and gang members accountable for criminal acts. Expanded juvenile programs, including the boot camp, to rehabilitate juvenile offenders. Improved Sheriff's operations facilities in aide of law enforcement.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9601, "fingerprint": "2001|200100005|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100005|KINGS", "content_hash": "04ac84b7b285c416", "measure_id": "200100005", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a one-half percent sales tax for general County purposes with the following mandatory restrictions? 1. The tax shall expire within eight years. 2. A local citizens' Oversight Committee is formed to monitor all expenditures of the sales tax proceeds, to cause an annual independent audit of the expenditures, and to report it audit annually to the public.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4074, "no_votes": 4398, "total_votes": 8472, "percent_yes": 48.08781869688385, "percent_no": 51.91218130311615, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.259535", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.897602", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a one-half percent sales tax for general County purposes with the following mandatory restrictions? 1. The tax shall expire within eight years. 2. A local citizens' Oversight Committee is formed to monitor all expenditures of the sales tax proceeds, to cause an annual independent audit of the expenditures, and to report it audit annually to the public.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9604, "fingerprint": "2001|200100191|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100191|LAKE", "content_hash": "ccaa087551fe3b9e", "measure_id": "200100191", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and repair classrooms, science labs and libraries; for basic modernization of school buildings, including replacing electrical, heating, plumbing and other critical systems; and to build a new community-use multipurpose facility and qualify for State matching funds, shall the Lakeport Unified School District issue $7,300,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to improve school sites as specified in the District's Bond Project List, and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1246, "no_votes": 548, "total_votes": 1794, "percent_yes": 69.45373467112597, "percent_no": 30.54626532887403, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.260425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.898163", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and repair classrooms, science labs and libraries; for basic modernization of school buildings, including replacing electrical, heating, plumbing and other critical systems; and to build a new community-use multipurpose facility and qualify for State matching funds, shall the Lakeport Unified School District issue $7,300,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to improve school sites as specified in the District's Bond Project List, and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9603, "fingerprint": "2001|200100190|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100190|LAKE", "content_hash": "b2898746006b1a8a", "measure_id": "200100190", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct, furnish and equip a multi-purpose building at Kelseyville High School, which would include a cafeteria, a kitchen, a music program practice room, a stage for performances, and would be available for community and athletic events, shall the Kelseyville Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of $2,930,000 at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits and citizen oversight? The District's Board has evaluated safety, class size reduction and information technology needs.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1361, "no_votes": 356, "total_votes": 1717, "percent_yes": 79.26616191030867, "percent_no": 20.733838089691332, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.260155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.897981", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, furnish and equip a multi-purpose building at Kelseyville High School, which would include a cafeteria, a kitchen, a music program practice room, a stage for performances, and would be available for community and athletic events, shall the Kelseyville Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of $2,930,000 at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits and citizen oversight? The District's Board has evaluated safety, class size reduction and information technology needs.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9605, "fingerprint": "2001|200100013|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100013|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "293d17a996ddaa93", "measure_id": "200100013", "measure_letter": "01-A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council adopt an Ordinance which imposes a 9% tax on persons staying 30 days or less in hotels, motels, and similar lodgings within the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 510, "no_votes": 439, "total_votes": 949, "percent_yes": 53.74077976817703, "percent_no": 46.25922023182297, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.260695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.898345", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council adopt an Ordinance which imposes a 9% tax on persons staying 30 days or less in hotels, motels, and similar lodgings within the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9606, "fingerprint": "2001|200100014|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100014|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9a07312741d6bffa", "measure_id": "200100014", "measure_letter": "01-B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Administrator have the permanent authority to hire a City Clerk as a City employee at the expiration of the current term or earlier vacancy of the Office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 521, "no_votes": 429, "total_votes": 950, "percent_yes": 54.84210526315789, "percent_no": 45.15789473684211, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.261015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.898525", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Administrator have the permanent authority to hire a City Clerk as a City employee at the expiration of the current term or earlier vacancy of the Office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9611, "fingerprint": "2001|200100051|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100051|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "700eaa59faca7e93", "measure_id": "200100051", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(Advisory) Shall Burbank City Council member compensation be increased by 5% ($44 per month) effective May 1, 2001, and effective May 1, 2002, shall it be further increased by a percentage equal to the change in the local Consumer Price Index, but not to exceed 5% (maximum increase for second year is $46 per month)?  Any increases or decreases in Council member compensation after May 1, 2002 will continue to be governed by the provisions of the Burbank Charter and Municipal Code.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5019, "no_votes": 4651, "total_votes": 9670, "percent_yes": 51.90279214064116, "percent_no": 48.09720785935884, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-04-10", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.263358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.900187", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Advisory) Shall Burbank City Council member compensation be increased by 5% ($44 per month) effective May 1, 2001, and effective May 1, 2002, shall it be further increased by a percentage equal to the change in the local Consumer Price Index, but not to exceed 5% (maximum increase for second year is $46 per month)?  Any increases or decreases in Council member compensation after May 1, 2002 will continue to be governed by the provisions of the Burbank Charter and Municipal Code.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9612, "fingerprint": "2001|200100052|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100052|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ef8a92f9fcd9c837", "measure_id": "200100052", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed Charter Amendment be ratified, which would amend various sections of the Charter of the City of Burbank to eliminate obsolete language, provide consistency, clarify the powers and duties of certain departments and boards, change the name of two City departments, provide who shall act as City Manager in the event of the City Manager's absence, provide that the financial Services Department shall maintain monthly financial reports, raise the dollar amount over which public works construction projects are required to be awarded by the Council, require City boards to have Council approval prior to issuing subpoenas, amend the section relating to franchises and make numerous other minor changes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5835, "no_votes": 3508, "total_votes": 9343, "percent_yes": 62.45317349887617, "percent_no": 37.54682650112383, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-04-10", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.263628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.900370", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed Charter Amendment be ratified, which would amend various sections of the Charter of the City of Burbank to eliminate obsolete language, provide consistency, clarify the powers and duties of certain departments and boards, change the name of two City departments, provide who shall act as City Manager in the event of the City Manager's absence, provide that the financial Services Department shall maintain monthly financial reports, raise the dollar amount over which public works construction projects are required to be awarded by the Council, require City boards to have Council approval prior to issuing subpoenas, amend the section relating to franchises and make numerous other minor changes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12016, "fingerprint": "2001|200100135|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100135|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "8d86b19e849b45f5", "measure_id": "200100135", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(Advisory) Shall the City Council be directed to pursue the reuse of the property currently operated by the City as an airport to generate additional revenues to improve education, police and other community services, to diversify the economic base, and to create jobs for residents of the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1903, "no_votes": 4429, "total_votes": 6332, "percent_yes": 30.05369551484523, "percent_no": 69.94630448515477, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.107915", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.265028", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.901747", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Advisory) Shall the City Council be directed to pursue the reuse of the property currently operated by the City as an airport to generate additional revenues to improve education, police and other community services, to diversify the economic base, and to create jobs for residents of the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12015, "fingerprint": "2001|200100053|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100053|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1f9de43898e5a01b", "measure_id": "200100053", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the political geographical area within the City of Compton's Municipal boundaries de-annex from the Compton Unified School District and become a school district of its own?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3285, "no_votes": 4915, "total_votes": 8200, "percent_yes": 40.0609756097561, "percent_no": 59.9390243902439, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-04-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.106653", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.263952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.900561", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the political geographical area within the City of Compton's Municipal boundaries de-annex from the Compton Unified School District and become a school district of its own?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12012, "fingerprint": "2001|200100018|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100018|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "58f357d18da832ae", "measure_id": "200100018", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 26 of Article XXVI of the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to permit a person to be re-elected to the Office of Mayor or the office of Councilmember for two terms after a break in service of three years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1735, "no_votes": 2178, "total_votes": 3913, "percent_yes": 44.33938154868387, "percent_no": 55.66061845131613, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.104822", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.262161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.899270", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 26 of Article XXVI of the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to permit a person to be re-elected to the Office of Mayor or the office of Councilmember for two terms after a break in service of three years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9607, "fingerprint": "2001|200100015|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100015|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "98e6f963b82ffa7c", "measure_id": "200100015", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(Initiative) Shall an Initiative Ordinance of the City of Pasadena be adopted to declare the policy of the City of Pasadena to be in favor of completing the 710 Freeway extension between the 1-210 and the 1-10 Freeways, and to declare that such policy could not be changed or repealed without a vote of people?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9654, "no_votes": 6908, "total_votes": 16562, "percent_yes": 58.290061586764885, "percent_no": 41.709938413235115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.261285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.898715", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Initiative) Shall an Initiative Ordinance of the City of Pasadena be adopted to declare the policy of the City of Pasadena to be in favor of completing the 710 Freeway extension between the 1-210 and the 1-10 Freeways, and to declare that such policy could not be changed or repealed without a vote of people?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12017, "fingerprint": "2001|200100136|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100136|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6cf70fe4ff3b1ccd", "measure_id": "200100136", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Hotel and Motel Bed Tax be increased from eight percent (8%) to twelve percent (12%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3095, "no_votes": 3008, "total_votes": 6103, "percent_yes": 50.71276421432083, "percent_no": 49.28723578567917, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.108193", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.265295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.901933", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Hotel and Motel Bed Tax be increased from eight percent (8%) to twelve percent (12%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12013, "fingerprint": "2001|200100019|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100019|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ec02c16aff862460", "measure_id": "200100019", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 16 or Article XVI of the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to permit a person to be re-elected to the Office of School Board Member for two terms after a break in service of three years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1755, "no_votes": 2150, "total_votes": 3905, "percent_yes": 44.94238156209987, "percent_no": 55.05761843790013, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.105031", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.262473", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.899497", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 16 or Article XVI of the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to permit a person to be re-elected to the Office of School Board Member for two terms after a break in service of three years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9608, "fingerprint": "2001|200100016|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100016|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c3beee1c16ddd152", "measure_id": "200100016", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter be amended to prohibit elected and appointed local public officials from receiving what is specified as a \"public or campaign advantage\" from recipients of certain public benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8845, "no_votes": 5865, "total_votes": 14710, "percent_yes": 60.129163834126444, "percent_no": 39.870836165873556, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.261618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.898898", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pasadena City Charter be amended to prohibit elected and appointed local public officials from receiving what is specified as a \"public or campaign advantage\" from recipients of certain public benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12020, "fingerprint": "2001|200100196|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100196|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "df0743c5549a21c1", "measure_id": "200100196", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe classroom overcrowding, renovate aging science labs and classrooms, improve health, safety and accessibility standards, upgrade electrical wiring and technology, construct academic classrooms, facilities, high tech computer labs and job training facilities, qualify for state matching funds, establish a Fiscal Oversight Committee and annual independent audits with all funds staying in our community, shall Santa Clarita Community College District (College of the Canyons) issue $82,110,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16370, "no_votes": 7680, "total_votes": 24050, "percent_yes": 68.06652806652806, "percent_no": 31.933471933471935, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.113359", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.274368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.905434", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe classroom overcrowding, renovate aging science labs and classrooms, improve health, safety and accessibility standards, upgrade electrical wiring and technology, construct academic classrooms, facilities, high tech computer labs and job training facilities, qualify for state matching funds, establish a Fiscal Oversight Committee and annual independent audits with all funds staying in our community, shall Santa Clarita Community College District (College of the Canyons) issue $82,110,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12014, "fingerprint": "2001|200100020|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100020|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7390bce9595b62cb", "measure_id": "200100020", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article XIX of the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to allow for design-build and design-build-operate public works contracts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2475, "no_votes": 1252, "total_votes": 3727, "percent_yes": 66.40729809498256, "percent_no": 33.592701905017435, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.105285", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.262749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.899691", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article XIX of the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to allow for design-build and design-build-operate public works contracts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9609, "fingerprint": "2001|200100017|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100017|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "87b141df9ae3f60f", "measure_id": "200100017", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to require preparation of a Citywide Transportation and Traffic Management Plan and to direct that the City take no position supporting or opposing the 710 Freeway extension until that Plan and federally funded traffic improvement measures required in the Federal Government's Record of Decision approving the 710 Freeway extension are fully implemented and evaluated?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7232, "no_votes": 8912, "total_votes": 16144, "percent_yes": 44.79682854311199, "percent_no": 55.20317145688801, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.261892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.899086", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to require preparation of a Citywide Transportation and Traffic Management Plan and to direct that the City take no position supporting or opposing the 710 Freeway extension until that Plan and federally funded traffic improvement measures required in the Federal Government's Record of Decision approving the 710 Freeway extension are fully implemented and evaluated?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12019, "fingerprint": "2001|200100192|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100192|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ac9c14448d09b95c", "measure_id": "200100192", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Formation of a Carson Unified School District. Shall parts of both the Compton Unified School District and the Los Angeles Unified School District be reorganized to form the Carson Unified School District whose boundaries will be coterminious with the City of Carson (excluding the Ralph Bunche Elementary School in the Compton Unified School District)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2644, "no_votes": 7365, "total_votes": 10009, "percent_yes": 26.41622539714257, "percent_no": 73.58377460285743, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.112299", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.273259", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.904702", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Formation of a Carson Unified School District. Shall parts of both the Compton Unified School District and the Los Angeles Unified School District be reorganized to form the Carson Unified School District whose boundaries will be coterminious with the City of Carson (excluding the Ralph Bunche Elementary School in the Compton Unified School District)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9610, "fingerprint": "2001|200100021|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100021|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "59fa85501e1c4d61", "measure_id": "200100021", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to authorize the City Clerk to hire and terminate his or her deputies, transfer responsibility for the administration of the financial affairs of the City, including the accounting function, from the City Clerk to the City Manager, and delete the accounting educational requirement for the position of the City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1428, "no_votes": 2405, "total_votes": 3833, "percent_yes": 37.255413514218624, "percent_no": 62.744586485781376, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.263089", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.899993", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Redondo Beach City Charter be amended to authorize the City Clerk to hire and terminate his or her deputies, transfer responsibility for the administration of the financial affairs of the City, including the accounting function, from the City Clerk to the City Manager, and delete the accounting educational requirement for the position of the City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9629, "fingerprint": "2001|200100193|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100193|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2ecb76ba512922d3", "measure_id": "200100193", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to complete remaining facilities renovations at El Segundo High School, to make necessary health and safety improvements to benefit all students, and to provide competitive educational programs through the construction of a new academic science center, shall the El Segundo Unified School District issue up to $25,000,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limits to acquire, construct, and improve facilities at El Segundo High School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2369, "no_votes": 780, "total_votes": 3149, "percent_yes": 75.23023181962529, "percent_no": 24.76976818037471, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.273536", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.904883", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to complete remaining facilities renovations at El Segundo High School, to make necessary health and safety improvements to benefit all students, and to provide competitive educational programs through the construction of a new academic science center, shall the El Segundo Unified School District issue up to $25,000,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limits to acquire, construct, and improve facilities at El Segundo High School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9616, "fingerprint": "2001|200100137|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100137|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "18b953a3b418c7be", "measure_id": "200100137", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that: (1) establishes new regulations, procedures, programs and restrictions pertaining to temporary events in the coastal zone, (2) directs the use of revenues from temporary events, (3) prohibits admission fees and permanent commercial advertising and sales on the beach, and (4) requires funding of stormwater runoff diversion programs, weekly testing of ocean water, beach cleanup days, and preparation of a Local Coastal Program for consideration by the Coastal commission?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 960, "no_votes": 2689, "total_votes": 3649, "percent_yes": 26.308577692518497, "percent_no": 73.6914223074815, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.265560", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.902122", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that: (1) establishes new regulations, procedures, programs and restrictions pertaining to temporary events in the coastal zone, (2) directs the use of revenues from temporary events, (3) prohibits admission fees and permanent commercial advertising and sales on the beach, and (4) requires funding of stormwater runoff diversion programs, weekly testing of ocean water, beach cleanup days, and preparation of a Local Coastal Program for consideration by the Coastal commission?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9617, "fingerprint": "2001|200100138|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100138|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a996dbfedeabb579", "measure_id": "200100138", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would prohibit a person from serving more than two consecutive terms on the Hermosa Beach city council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1337, "no_votes": 2296, "total_votes": 3633, "percent_yes": 36.80154142581888, "percent_no": 63.19845857418112, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.265825", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.902310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would prohibit a person from serving more than two consecutive terms on the Hermosa Beach city council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9618, "fingerprint": "2001|200100139|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100139|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c40bfcac8ba96cb7", "measure_id": "200100139", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would repeal the City's utility user tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1100, "no_votes": 2488, "total_votes": 3588, "percent_yes": 30.65774804905239, "percent_no": 69.34225195094761, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.266090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.902495", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that would repeal the City's utility user tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9622, "fingerprint": "2001|200100144|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100144|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b8b497aec2667937", "measure_id": "200100144", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to limit the number of terms persons may serve as Mayor and or members of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4665, "no_votes": 4649, "total_votes": 9314, "percent_yes": 50.08589220528237, "percent_no": 49.91410779471763, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.269815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.903419", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to limit the number of terms persons may serve as Mayor and or members of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9623, "fingerprint": "2001|200100145|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100145|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d42f8a3cb20d1b0d", "measure_id": "200100145", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the Legislative body of the City of Palmdale be elected from districts as described in Ordinance 1188, with the Mayor of the City of Palmdale continuing to be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4281, "no_votes": 4695, "total_votes": 8976, "percent_yes": 47.69385026737968, "percent_no": 52.30614973262032, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.270467", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.903606", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the Legislative body of the City of Palmdale be elected from districts as described in Ordinance 1188, with the Mayor of the City of Palmdale continuing to be elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12018, "fingerprint": "2001|200100140|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100140|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f95da6f71b3c0232", "measure_id": "200100140", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Malibu issue its general obligation bond in the amount of $15 million to acquire land for such public purposes as parks, playgrounds, playing fields, trails, community centers in order to serve children, teens, families, adults, and seniors with recreation, social and education programs, including improvements and construction; and to protect natural areas and wildlife habitat? Up to 15% of these funds may be used for improvements or construction.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1690, "no_votes": 1035, "total_votes": 2725, "percent_yes": 62.018348623853214, "percent_no": 37.981651376146786, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.109321", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.266351", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.902681", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Malibu issue its general obligation bond in the amount of $15 million to acquire land for such public purposes as parks, playgrounds, playing fields, trails, community centers in order to serve children, teens, families, adults, and seniors with recreation, social and education programs, including improvements and construction; and to protect natural areas and wildlife habitat? Up to 15% of these funds may be used for improvements or construction.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9613, "fingerprint": "2001|200100074|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100074|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "09de14f4f202edae", "measure_id": "200100074", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood schools, relieve classroom overcrowding, replace inadequate electrical, heating and ventilation systems, roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, renovate outdated science laboratories, and renovate and/or add classrooms and other facilities, shall Covina-Valley Unified School District issue $50 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee funds are spent only on school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4746, "no_votes": 1805, "total_votes": 6551, "percent_yes": 72.44695466341017, "percent_no": 27.553045336589832, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.264222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.900926", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood schools, relieve classroom overcrowding, replace inadequate electrical, heating and ventilation systems, roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, renovate outdated science laboratories, and renovate and/or add classrooms and other facilities, shall Covina-Valley Unified School District issue $50 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee funds are spent only on school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9614, "fingerprint": "2001|200100133|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100133|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3a4000bb1dac6ad8", "measure_id": "200100133", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If, and only if, the State of California provides a 65% matching share of the cost to build a new and expanded Library, shall the City of Azusa, California incur bonded indebtedness (in an amount not to exceed $5,875,000 at interest rates not to exceed 6% per year), to provide our 35% local share to improve free educational resources and opportunities for children, families and our entire community, in cooperation with our local schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2089, "no_votes": 643, "total_votes": 2732, "percent_yes": 76.4641288433382, "percent_no": 23.5358711566618, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.264489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.901345", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If, and only if, the State of California provides a 65% matching share of the cost to build a new and expanded Library, shall the City of Azusa, California incur bonded indebtedness (in an amount not to exceed $5,875,000 at interest rates not to exceed 6% per year), to provide our 35% local share to improve free educational resources and opportunities for children, families and our entire community, in cooperation with our local schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9624, "fingerprint": "2001|200100146|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100146|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "baa07198b4b2cc7c", "measure_id": "200100146", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to ratify and continue the 1991 increase of the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4320, "no_votes": 1581, "total_votes": 5901, "percent_yes": 73.2079308591764, "percent_no": 26.7920691408236, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.271156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.903788", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to ratify and continue the 1991 increase of the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9625, "fingerprint": "2001|200100147|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100147|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "05a7960ace1fed30", "measure_id": "200100147", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shan an ordinance be adopted to ratify and continue the collection of the existing 10% golf tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4678, "no_votes": 1157, "total_votes": 5835, "percent_yes": 80.17137960582691, "percent_no": 19.828620394173086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.271680", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.903969", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shan an ordinance be adopted to ratify and continue the collection of the existing 10% golf tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9620, "fingerprint": "2001|200100142|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100142|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a47398ccd19f70ab", "measure_id": "200100142", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 10655, which amends the City's Land Use Element of the General Plan as set forth on the map attached to the resolution, be adopted, and amendments to the City's Zoning Map, Zoning Code and Specific Plans consistent with this amendment be authorized for adoption by the City Council and approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3448, "no_votes": 1817, "total_votes": 5265, "percent_yes": 65.48907882241217, "percent_no": 34.51092117758783, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.268359", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.903046", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 10655, which amends the City's Land Use Element of the General Plan as set forth on the map attached to the resolution, be adopted, and amendments to the City's Zoning Map, Zoning Code and Specific Plans consistent with this amendment be authorized for adoption by the City Council and approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9621, "fingerprint": "2001|200100143|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100143|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "daaef0a02d20eb1a", "measure_id": "200100143", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which establishes a limited annual parcel tax for the Monterey Park Fire Department? The proceeds of the tax are for the Fire Department only, to pay for fire station reconstruction and increased paramedic staff.  This special Paramedic/Fire protection tax specifically supplements and does not replace the City's Fire Department general fund budget. The tax has a twenty-five year term and provides for certain exemptions.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3454, "no_votes": 2022, "total_votes": 5476, "percent_yes": 63.07523739956172, "percent_no": 36.92476260043828, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.269185", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.903230", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which establishes a limited annual parcel tax for the Monterey Park Fire Department? The proceeds of the tax are for the Fire Department only, to pay for fire station reconstruction and increased paramedic staff.  This special Paramedic/Fire protection tax specifically supplements and does not replace the City's Fire Department general fund budget. The tax has a twenty-five year term and provides for certain exemptions.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9626, "fingerprint": "2001|200100148|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100148|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7c5b98a1974e0e09", "measure_id": "200100148", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to repeal all assessments on real property within the City of Torrance for municipal lighting, including the assessment for the City of Torrance Lighting District No. 99-1 starting the first fiscal year following passage of the initiative and all subsequent fiscal years be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5130, "no_votes": 7685, "total_votes": 12815, "percent_yes": 40.03121342177136, "percent_no": 59.96878657822864, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.272121", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.904153", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to repeal all assessments on real property within the City of Torrance for municipal lighting, including the assessment for the City of Torrance Lighting District No. 99-1 starting the first fiscal year following passage of the initiative and all subsequent fiscal years be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9630, "fingerprint": "2001|200100194|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100194|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2158fc0526214d35", "measure_id": "200100194", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Mt. San Antonio Community College District preserve educational opportunities, relieve overcrowding, and improve safety conditions by replacing/repairing deteriorating buildings/classrooms/plumbing/heating/air conditioning/sewer systems; repairing/upgrading electric wiring for computer technology; modernizing laboratories; improving security/ lighting/parking; removing asbestos; and building new classrooms to accommodate rapid growth, by issuing $221 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with locally-appointed Citizens' Oversight Committee, published annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20315, "no_votes": 14412, "total_votes": 34727, "percent_yes": 58.49915051688888, "percent_no": 41.50084948311112, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.273816", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.905063", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Mt. San Antonio Community College District preserve educational opportunities, relieve overcrowding, and improve safety conditions by replacing/repairing deteriorating buildings/classrooms/plumbing/heating/air conditioning/sewer systems; repairing/upgrading electric wiring for computer technology; modernizing laboratories; improving security/ lighting/parking; removing asbestos; and building new classrooms to accommodate rapid growth, by issuing $221 million in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with locally-appointed Citizens' Oversight Committee, published annual audits, and no money for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9615, "fingerprint": "2001|200100134|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100134|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2cf573ece466c9a3", "measure_id": "200100134", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which would prohibit the sale, use, and/or possession of all fireworks including safe and sane fireworks, within the City of Baldwin Park?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1513, "no_votes": 2098, "total_votes": 3611, "percent_yes": 41.89975076156189, "percent_no": 58.10024923843811, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.264755", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.901552", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which would prohibit the sale, use, and/or possession of all fireworks including safe and sane fireworks, within the City of Baldwin Park?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9627, "fingerprint": "2001|200100149|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100149|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "87d3a18f09fcf8e5", "measure_id": "200100149", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ordinance No. 171-01, which ratifies and maintains the 1990 increase of the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1154, "no_votes": 449, "total_votes": 1603, "percent_yes": 71.99001871490954, "percent_no": 28.00998128509046, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.272712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.904333", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ordinance No. 171-01, which ratifies and maintains the 1990 increase of the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9628, "fingerprint": "2001|200100150|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100150|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2e45254ad50a1ef8", "measure_id": "200100150", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 172-01, which ratifies the 1990 increase of the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10%, and additionally increases such tax by 4%, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 488, "no_votes": 1102, "total_votes": 1590, "percent_yes": 30.69182389937107, "percent_no": 69.30817610062893, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.272988", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.904517", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 172-01, which ratifies the 1990 increase of the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10%, and additionally increases such tax by 4%, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9632, "fingerprint": "2001|200100197|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100197|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "79114fa29a8c6cf1", "measure_id": "200100197", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding by constructing and acquiring additional schools, classrooms and facilities, renovating and expanding existing junior high and high schools, including replacement of inadequate lighting, electrical, plumbing systems, roofs, renovation of classrooms, and libraries, shall the William S. Hart Union High School District issue $158 million in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements referred to in the project list, and perform annual audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18100, "no_votes": 7484, "total_votes": 25584, "percent_yes": 70.7473420888055, "percent_no": 29.252657911194504, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.274677", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.905616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding by constructing and acquiring additional schools, classrooms and facilities, renovating and expanding existing junior high and high schools, including replacement of inadequate lighting, electrical, plumbing systems, roofs, renovation of classrooms, and libraries, shall the William S. Hart Union High School District issue $158 million in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements referred to in the project list, and perform annual audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9631, "fingerprint": "2001|200100195|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100195|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4bec92f7fe1cf8cd", "measure_id": "200100195", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce student overcrowding throughout the Palmdale School District, improve student safety, continue class size reduction, and obtain State funding; construct, furnish and equip two K-8 schools (one east and one west of 25th Street East) and renovate and build additional K-8 classrooms throughout the District, shall the Palmdale School District issue up to $25,000,000 of bonds, subject to accountability requirements and legal limits and based on the District's safety, class size reduction, and information technology needs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3848, "no_votes": 3123, "total_votes": 6971, "percent_yes": 55.20011476115335, "percent_no": 44.79988523884665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.274095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.905251", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce student overcrowding throughout the Palmdale School District, improve student safety, continue class size reduction, and obtain State funding; construct, furnish and equip two K-8 schools (one east and one west of 25th Street East) and renovate and build additional K-8 classrooms throughout the District, shall the Palmdale School District issue up to $25,000,000 of bonds, subject to accountability requirements and legal limits and based on the District's safety, class size reduction, and information technology needs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9619, "fingerprint": "2001|200100141|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100141|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cad0466b21388fc6", "measure_id": "200100141", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To build City police and fire facilities which will replace inadequate existing facilities, meet current seismic, health and safety standards, provide improved safety and emergency response services and provide civic center parking, shall the City of Manhattan Beach issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $15,000,000 at interest rates within the legal limit and levy an additional ad valorem tax upon taxable property within the City to secure the bonds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3712, "no_votes": 2437, "total_votes": 6149, "percent_yes": 60.36753943730688, "percent_no": 39.63246056269312, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.266671", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.902865", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build City police and fire facilities which will replace inadequate existing facilities, meet current seismic, health and safety standards, provide improved safety and emergency response services and provide civic center parking, shall the City of Manhattan Beach issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $15,000,000 at interest rates within the legal limit and levy an additional ad valorem tax upon taxable property within the City to secure the bonds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9635, "fingerprint": "2001|200100055|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100055|MARIN", "content_hash": "55172984049316f1", "measure_id": "200100055", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Paula Kamena be recalled (removed) from the office of District Attorney?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6849, "no_votes": 41215, "total_votes": 48064, "percent_yes": 14.24975033288948, "percent_no": 85.75024966711052, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-05-22", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.275599", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.906167", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Paula Kamena be recalled (removed) from the office of District Attorney?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12023, "fingerprint": "2001|200100199|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100199|MARIN", "content_hash": "4cdff467db85ead2", "measure_id": "200100199", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and rehabilitate local schools, including health and safety repairs to classrooms, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Novato Unified School District, with annual audits and citizens' oversight, upgrade inadequate plumbing, electrical, heating and ventilation systems, renovate children's restrooms, repair deteriorating roofs, remove asbestos, repair dry rot, upgrade fire safety systems, improve intercom and public address systems, and make other improvements to school sites and buildings by issuing $107 million of bonds within legal interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8419, "no_votes": 5249, "total_votes": 13668, "percent_yes": 61.59642961662277, "percent_no": 38.40357038337723, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.118329", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.278865", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.908345", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and rehabilitate local schools, including health and safety repairs to classrooms, and qualify for State matching funds, shall Novato Unified School District, with annual audits and citizens' oversight, upgrade inadequate plumbing, electrical, heating and ventilation systems, renovate children's restrooms, repair deteriorating roofs, remove asbestos, repair dry rot, upgrade fire safety systems, improve intercom and public address systems, and make other improvements to school sites and buildings by issuing $107 million of bonds within legal interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12021, "fingerprint": "2001|200100056|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100056|MARIN", "content_hash": "3be33f5f436c4634", "measure_id": "200100056", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the master plan ordinance (City of Novato Ordinance No. 1437) establishing certain land use regulations which will allow the development of the Bahia residential project be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4182, "no_votes": 9246, "total_votes": 13428, "percent_yes": 31.14387846291331, "percent_no": 68.8561215370867, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-05-22", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.114548", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.275875", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.906351", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the master plan ordinance (City of Novato Ordinance No. 1437) establishing certain land use regulations which will allow the development of the Bahia residential project be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9634, "fingerprint": "2001|200100037|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100037|MARIN", "content_hash": "9379714971fff298", "measure_id": "200100037", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance the quality of education through facility modernization and technology upgrades; ensure safety for students, staff, and community users;  remove asbestos; renovate and build classrooms and student facilities; replace inadequate electrical, roofing, heating/ventilation and plumbing; improve disabled access and earthquake safety; and rehabilitate athletic facilities, shall Tamalpais Union High School District issue $121 million of bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor and audit bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14527, "no_votes": 6792, "total_votes": 21319, "percent_yes": 68.14109479806744, "percent_no": 31.858905201932558, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.275306", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.905983", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance the quality of education through facility modernization and technology upgrades; ensure safety for students, staff, and community users;  remove asbestos; renovate and build classrooms and student facilities; replace inadequate electrical, roofing, heating/ventilation and plumbing; improve disabled access and earthquake safety; and rehabilitate athletic facilities, shall Tamalpais Union High School District issue $121 million of bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor and audit bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12022, "fingerprint": "2001|200100198|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100198|MARIN", "content_hash": "cafa5a00eb17fe6a", "measure_id": "200100198", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Lagunitas School District secure and improve its Arts, Sciences, Music, Language, Environmental, and Technology programs, and professional services for children in need, as well as safeguarding reduced class size, by levying $197 per assessor's parcel per year, with 6.5% yearly cost-of-living adjustment for eight years, beginning July 1st, 2002, exempting and parcel used as a principal place of residence by any owner 65 years old before May 1wt of that year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 754, "no_votes": 289, "total_votes": 1043, "percent_yes": 72.29146692233941, "percent_no": 27.70853307766059, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.117982", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.278596", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.908166", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Lagunitas School District secure and improve its Arts, Sciences, Music, Language, Environmental, and Technology programs, and professional services for children in need, as well as safeguarding reduced class size, by levying $197 per assessor's parcel per year, with 6.5% yearly cost-of-living adjustment for eight years, beginning July 1st, 2002, exempting and parcel used as a principal place of residence by any owner 65 years old before May 1wt of that year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9633, "fingerprint": "2001|200100006|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100006|MARIN", "content_hash": "758a6f33a61b9740", "measure_id": "200100006", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the special tax for Sheriff patrol services, levied annually upon living units located within County Service Area No. 17 (Kent Woodlands) be increased from $195.00 per year to an amount not to exceed $260.00 per year for each living unit within that area commencing with the 2001-2002 fiscal year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 441, "no_votes": 56, "total_votes": 497, "percent_yes": 88.73239436619718, "percent_no": 11.267605633802816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.274977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.905802", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the special tax for Sheriff patrol services, levied annually upon living units located within County Service Area No. 17 (Kent Woodlands) be increased from $195.00 per year to an amount not to exceed $260.00 per year for each living unit within that area commencing with the 2001-2002 fiscal year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9645, "fingerprint": "2001|200100200|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100200|MARIN", "content_hash": "54086badb110e3e6", "measure_id": "200100200", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance the quality of education through the repair and replacement of old and deteriorating facilities to ensure safety for students, staff and community members; upgrade inadequate electrical, heating and plumbing systems; increase seismic safety standards; eliminate dry rot; remove asbestos in lead paint; and relieve overcrowding by building additional classrooms, shall the Reed Union School District issue $38 million of bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor and audit bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2886, "no_votes": 978, "total_votes": 3864, "percent_yes": 74.68944099378882, "percent_no": 25.31055900621118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.279142", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.908527", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance the quality of education through the repair and replacement of old and deteriorating facilities to ensure safety for students, staff and community members; upgrade inadequate electrical, heating and plumbing systems; increase seismic safety standards; eliminate dry rot; remove asbestos in lead paint; and relieve overcrowding by building additional classrooms, shall the Reed Union School District issue $38 million of bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor and audit bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9636, "fingerprint": "2001|200100104|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100104|MARIN", "content_hash": "16daa5273b2f09c9", "measure_id": "200100104", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Bel Marin Keys Community Services District (the \"District\"), be authorized to levy a Parcel Tax in the amount of $510 upon each taxable parcel of property within the District, commencing in the fiscal year 2002-2003 and increasing thereafter at the rate of 2% per year for the specific purpose of paying for the capital costs of and costs of operation and maintenance of the District's marine facilities and related costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 658, "no_votes": 166, "total_votes": 824, "percent_yes": 79.85436893203884, "percent_no": 20.145631067961162, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.276148", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.906530", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bel Marin Keys Community Services District (the \"District\"), be authorized to levy a Parcel Tax in the amount of $510 upon each taxable parcel of property within the District, commencing in the fiscal year 2002-2003 and increasing thereafter at the rate of 2% per year for the specific purpose of paying for the capital costs of and costs of operation and maintenance of the District's marine facilities and related costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9637, "fingerprint": "2001|200100105|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100105|MARIN", "content_hash": "3d79b41fc080f756", "measure_id": "200100105", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Bel Marin Keys Community Services District (the \"District\"), for its Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Marine Facilities Improvements) (the \"CFD\"), issue special tax bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,600,000 to finance improvements to the District's marine facilities, including related costs (the \"Facilities\"); shall a special tax be levied each year on all taxable properties in the CFD to finance the Facilities and bond-related costs; and shall the appropriations limit for the CFD be established at $1,500,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 633, "no_votes": 189, "total_votes": 822, "percent_yes": 77.00729927007299, "percent_no": 22.99270072992701, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.276414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.906713", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bel Marin Keys Community Services District (the \"District\"), for its Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Marine Facilities Improvements) (the \"CFD\"), issue special tax bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,600,000 to finance improvements to the District's marine facilities, including related costs (the \"Facilities\"); shall a special tax be levied each year on all taxable properties in the CFD to finance the Facilities and bond-related costs; and shall the appropriations limit for the CFD be established at $1,500,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9638, "fingerprint": "2001|200100106|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100106|MARIN", "content_hash": "c0e9c78de1b70634", "measure_id": "200100106", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Bel Marin Keys Community Services District (the \"District\"), for its Community Facilities District No. 2001-2 (Dredging and Marine Improvements) (the \"CFD\"), issue special tax bonds in an amount not to exceed $5,600,000 to finance improvements to the District's marine facilities, including related costs (the \"Facilities\"); shall a special tax be levied each year on all taxable properties in the CFD to pay for the Facilities and bond-related costs; and shall the appropriations limit for the CFD be established at $3,000,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 610, "no_votes": 210, "total_votes": 820, "percent_yes": 74.39024390243902, "percent_no": 25.609756097560975, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.276679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.906894", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bel Marin Keys Community Services District (the \"District\"), for its Community Facilities District No. 2001-2 (Dredging and Marine Improvements) (the \"CFD\"), issue special tax bonds in an amount not to exceed $5,600,000 to finance improvements to the District's marine facilities, including related costs (the \"Facilities\"); shall a special tax be levied each year on all taxable properties in the CFD to pay for the Facilities and bond-related costs; and shall the appropriations limit for the CFD be established at $3,000,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9639, "fingerprint": "2001|200100107|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100107|MARIN", "content_hash": "b6c6a36ed0c76eec", "measure_id": "200100107", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the existing special tax of $150.00 per annum be increased to $225.00 per parcel per annum within County Services Area No. 16 to provide additional landscaping and maintenance services within that area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 617, "no_votes": 391, "total_votes": 1008, "percent_yes": 61.21031746031746, "percent_no": 38.78968253968254, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.276974", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.907083", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing special tax of $150.00 per annum be increased to $225.00 per parcel per annum within County Services Area No. 16 to provide additional landscaping and maintenance services within that area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9640, "fingerprint": "2001|200100108|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100108|MARIN", "content_hash": "809d0be2b9b3b9db", "measure_id": "200100108", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a parcel tax in an amount of Nine Hundred Twenty Five Dollars ($925.00), be levied on each lot within County Service Area No. 29 annually for a period of ten (10) years, commencing in FY 2002-2003, terminating in FY 2011-2012, to provide funds for ongoing maintenance dredging in the principal waterways of Paradise Cay?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140, "no_votes": 4, "total_votes": 144, "percent_yes": 97.2222222222222, "percent_no": 2.7777777777778, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.277266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.907264", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a parcel tax in an amount of Nine Hundred Twenty Five Dollars ($925.00), be levied on each lot within County Service Area No. 29 annually for a period of ten (10) years, commencing in FY 2002-2003, terminating in FY 2011-2012, to provide funds for ongoing maintenance dredging in the principal waterways of Paradise Cay?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9641, "fingerprint": "2001|200100109|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100109|MARIN", "content_hash": "e5395f968f030864", "measure_id": "200100109", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit of County Service Area No. 29 be increased equal to the proceeds of the taxes imposed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 131, "no_votes": 8, "total_votes": 139, "percent_yes": 94.24460431654676, "percent_no": 5.755395683453244, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.277531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.907443", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit of County Service Area No. 29 be increased equal to the proceeds of the taxes imposed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9642, "fingerprint": "2001|200100110|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100110|MARIN", "content_hash": "02ce4a3472fc8f78", "measure_id": "200100110", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2001-07-25-1 of the Muir Beach Community Services District levying a special tax annually for a period of four years, commencing in FY 2001-2002, terminating in FY 2005-2006, in the amount of $3,250.00 per parcel for improved commercially zoned property, $300.00 per separate habitable structure on parcels containing residential property and $300.00 per parcel on all other parcels be adopted to provide funds for water system capital improvements as specified in said Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 113, "percent_yes": 76.10619469026548, "percent_no": 23.893805309734518, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.277795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.907621", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2001-07-25-1 of the Muir Beach Community Services District levying a special tax annually for a period of four years, commencing in FY 2001-2002, terminating in FY 2005-2006, in the amount of $3,250.00 per parcel for improved commercially zoned property, $300.00 per separate habitable structure on parcels containing residential property and $300.00 per parcel on all other parcels be adopted to provide funds for water system capital improvements as specified in said Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9643, "fingerprint": "2001|200100111|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100111|MARIN", "content_hash": "f93bb9d2d84717e5", "measure_id": "200100111", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2001-07-25-1 of the Muir Beach Community Services District levying a monthly water surcharge for a period of four years, commencing in FY 2001-2002, terminating in FY 2005-2006, in an amount not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the monthly billing for water service consumption be adopted as a special tax for water system capital improvements as specified in said Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84, "no_votes": 29, "total_votes": 113, "percent_yes": 74.33628318584071, "percent_no": 25.663716814159287, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.278060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.907804", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2001-07-25-1 of the Muir Beach Community Services District levying a monthly water surcharge for a period of four years, commencing in FY 2001-2002, terminating in FY 2005-2006, in an amount not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the monthly billing for water service consumption be adopted as a special tax for water system capital improvements as specified in said Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9644, "fingerprint": "2001|200100112|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100112|MARIN", "content_hash": "b47227981c4389a0", "measure_id": "200100112", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Muir Beach Community Services District be increased by an amount equal to the proceeds of the taxes imposed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 88, "no_votes": 23, "total_votes": 111, "percent_yes": 79.27927927927928, "percent_no": 20.72072072072072, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.278323", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.907987", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Muir Beach Community Services District be increased by an amount equal to the proceeds of the taxes imposed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9646, "fingerprint": "2001|200100201|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100201|MERCED", "content_hash": "3fd6d3d197aec409", "measure_id": "200100201", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct school facilities and remove safety hazards, shall the Le Grand Union High School/District incur bonded indebtedness of $1,950,000 at interest rates within legal limits, for school improvement purposes. Bond proceeds will be used to further implement the District's Master Plan for growth, and can include the addition of classrooms, building modernization, a cafeteria/multi-purpose building and replacement of an old main electrical service.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 396, "no_votes": 252, "total_votes": 648, "percent_yes": 61.11111111111112, "percent_no": 38.88888888888888, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.279442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.908714", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct school facilities and remove safety hazards, shall the Le Grand Union High School/District incur bonded indebtedness of $1,950,000 at interest rates within legal limits, for school improvement purposes. Bond proceeds will be used to further implement the District's Master Plan for growth, and can include the addition of classrooms, building modernization, a cafeteria/multi-purpose building and replacement of an old main electrical service.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9647, "fingerprint": "2001|200100050|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100050|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "93aee5995f8ae8a6", "measure_id": "200100050", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, upgrade, and add new classrooms to accoodate student growth at Toro Park, Washington, and San Benancio Middle School, shall Washington Union School District issue $13,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance construction and improvement of buildings for student safety, including building a new science complex and other clasrooms; replacing deteriorating floors, restrooms, roofs, plumbing, and portable buildings; upgrading and modernizing libraries; and upgrading access to technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1225, "no_votes": 444, "total_votes": 1669, "percent_yes": 73.39724385859796, "percent_no": 26.60275614140204, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-20", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.279773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.908895", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, upgrade, and add new classrooms to accoodate student growth at Toro Park, Washington, and San Benancio Middle School, shall Washington Union School District issue $13,000,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance construction and improvement of buildings for student safety, including building a new science complex and other clasrooms; replacing deteriorating floors, restrooms, roofs, plumbing, and portable buildings; upgrading and modernizing libraries; and upgrading access to technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9648, "fingerprint": "2001|200100151|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100151|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "9537a68106d222b1", "measure_id": "200100151", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall The charter of the city of Monterey be amended to replace Section 4.8 with a new Section 4.8 regarding Contracts for Public works, increasing the project cost limit requiring formal bidding to $50,000 and authorizing open-end job order contracts up to $1,000,000 per job order contract per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2201, "no_votes": 801, "total_votes": 3002, "percent_yes": 73.31778814123918, "percent_no": 26.682211858760823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.280041", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.909080", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall The charter of the city of Monterey be amended to replace Section 4.8 with a new Section 4.8 regarding Contracts for Public works, increasing the project cost limit requiring formal bidding to $50,000 and authorizing open-end job order contracts up to $1,000,000 per job order contract per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9649, "fingerprint": "2001|200100202|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100202|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "5bd36c0887591770", "measure_id": "200100202", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Chualar Union School District be authorized to construct and modernize school facilities and classrooms, install automatic fire alarm systems, complete asbestos abatement, modernize HVAC systmes, upgrade restrooms and sewers, replace plumbing systems, upgrade electrical systems to accomodate access to computers and modern technology, and construct a multipurpose cafeteria room, by issuing $1,900,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 157, "no_votes": 79, "total_votes": 236, "percent_yes": 66.52542372881356, "percent_no": 33.474576271186436, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.280310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.909259", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Chualar Union School District be authorized to construct and modernize school facilities and classrooms, install automatic fire alarm systems, complete asbestos abatement, modernize HVAC systmes, upgrade restrooms and sewers, replace plumbing systems, upgrade electrical systems to accomodate access to computers and modern technology, and construct a multipurpose cafeteria room, by issuing $1,900,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9650, "fingerprint": "2001|200100022|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100022|NAPA", "content_hash": "8258d62a4f9a9de5", "measure_id": "200100022", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Napa City Charter Section 20 - Circulation of Petitions: Petition Circulator - Residency be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7921, "no_votes": 3301, "total_votes": 11222, "percent_yes": 70.58456603101052, "percent_no": 29.415433968989475, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.280576", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.909438", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Napa City Charter Section 20 - Circulation of Petitions: Petition Circulator - Residency be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9651, "fingerprint": "2001|200100023|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100023|NAPA", "content_hash": "40dc9837d28ffb82", "measure_id": "200100023", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Napa City Charter Section 22 - Circulation of Ptions: Petition Circulator - Registration be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7749, "no_votes": 3300, "total_votes": 11049, "percent_yes": 70.13304371436328, "percent_no": 29.866956285636718, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.280840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.909616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Napa City Charter Section 22 - Circulation of Ptions: Petition Circulator - Registration be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9652, "fingerprint": "2001|200100024|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100024|NAPA", "content_hash": "994d0af383643715", "measure_id": "200100024", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Napa City Charter Section 101 Public works to be done by contract be amended to waive any and all requirements for the erection, improvement or repair of recreational facilities, excepting any auxiliary building, parking lot and off-site improvement exceeding $75,000.00, if the City Council determines by a four-fifths (4/5) vote that one or more community organizations and/or volunteers will perform a substantial portion of the labor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9004, "no_votes": 2413, "total_votes": 11417, "percent_yes": 78.86485066129455, "percent_no": 21.135149338705446, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.281136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.909796", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Napa City Charter Section 101 Public works to be done by contract be amended to waive any and all requirements for the erection, improvement or repair of recreational facilities, excepting any auxiliary building, parking lot and off-site improvement exceeding $75,000.00, if the City Council determines by a four-fifths (4/5) vote that one or more community organizations and/or volunteers will perform a substantial portion of the labor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9653, "fingerprint": "2001|200100038|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100038|NEVADA", "content_hash": "de142f1e9d45bf53", "measure_id": "200100038", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the TTUSD continue to Levy a special tax of $90 per year per assessor's parcel (equivalent to less than $7 per month) limited to four years beginning July 1, 2001 for classroom supplies and materials, vocational education, academic programs, music, computers and technology support, lower 4th and 5th grade class size, nursing, physical education, bus replacement fund, playground and field maintenance, librarians, and elementary school counseling, described in Resolution #13-00/01; shall the district appropriations limit be increased accordingly; shall a Citizens Review Committee monitor these funds; and shall exemptions be available for all taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1878, "no_votes": 644, "total_votes": 2522, "percent_yes": 74.46471054718478, "percent_no": 25.53528945281522, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.281428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.909978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the TTUSD continue to Levy a special tax of $90 per year per assessor's parcel (equivalent to less than $7 per month) limited to four years beginning July 1, 2001 for classroom supplies and materials, vocational education, academic programs, music, computers and technology support, lower 4th and 5th grade class size, nursing, physical education, bus replacement fund, playground and field maintenance, librarians, and elementary school counseling, described in Resolution #13-00/01; shall the district appropriations limit be increased accordingly; shall a Citizens Review Committee monitor these funds; and shall exemptions be available for all taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9654, "fingerprint": "2001|200100152|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100152|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f087f7da3500bc83", "measure_id": "200100152", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the utility user tax adopted in 1993 by Ordinance No. 740 be approved and the tax continue to be collected?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1563, "no_votes": 674, "total_votes": 2237, "percent_yes": 69.87036209208762, "percent_no": 30.129637907912382, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.281699", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.910159", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the utility user tax adopted in 1993 by Ordinance No. 740 be approved and the tax continue to be collected?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9655, "fingerprint": "2001|200100039|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100039|PLACER", "content_hash": "8281a689a11e69e9", "measure_id": "200100039", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the TTUSD continue to levy a special tax of $80 per year per assessor's parcel (equivalent to less than $7 per month) limited to four years beginning July 1, 2001 for classroom supplies and materials, vocational education, academic programs, music, computer and technology support, lower 4th and 5th grade class size, nursing, physical education, bus replacement fund, playground and field maintenance, librarians, and elementary school counseling, described in Resolution #13-00/01; shall the district appropriations limit be increased accordingly; shall a Citizens Review Committee monitor these funds; and shall exemptions be available for all taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1544, "no_votes": 624, "total_votes": 2168, "percent_yes": 71.21771217712177, "percent_no": 28.78228782287823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.281976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.910341", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the TTUSD continue to levy a special tax of $80 per year per assessor's parcel (equivalent to less than $7 per month) limited to four years beginning July 1, 2001 for classroom supplies and materials, vocational education, academic programs, music, computer and technology support, lower 4th and 5th grade class size, nursing, physical education, bus replacement fund, playground and field maintenance, librarians, and elementary school counseling, described in Resolution #13-00/01; shall the district appropriations limit be increased accordingly; shall a Citizens Review Committee monitor these funds; and shall exemptions be available for all taxpayers aged 65 and older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9657, "fingerprint": "2001|200100096|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100096|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "2f3c4626fa4f5686", "measure_id": "200100096", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Anne Eldred be Recalled from office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52, "no_votes": 59, "total_votes": 111, "percent_yes": 46.84684684684684, "percent_no": 53.15315315315316, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-08-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.282578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.910708", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Anne Eldred be Recalled from office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9658, "fingerprint": "2001|200100113|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100113|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "9b0c371bc20c6df2", "measure_id": "200100113", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the special tax be increased and continued for 10 years until 2012, for fire and medical protection in the West Almanor Community Services District to consist of a $90 tax on each condominium unit and each parcel except for parcel numbers: 108-010-04, 108-010-08, 108-010-15, 108-010-16, 108-010-17, 108-010-21, 108-010-23, 108-053-06, 108-053-07, 108-090-02, 108-141-01, 108-211-08, 108-283-04, 108-232-01, and 108-241-03 where there will be no tax and shall the appropriations limit specified in article Xiii-B of the California Constitution (also known as proposition 4) be increased for the West Almanor Community Services District by $100,000 for the 2002/2003 fiscal year, and for three succeeding fiscal years, for the purpose of allowing the district's tax proceeds to be spent for fire protection and emergency medical services.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 183, "no_votes": 47, "total_votes": 230, "percent_yes": 79.56521739130434, "percent_no": 20.434782608695656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.283051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.910888", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the special tax be increased and continued for 10 years until 2012, for fire and medical protection in the West Almanor Community Services District to consist of a $90 tax on each condominium unit and each parcel except for parcel numbers: 108-010-04, 108-010-08, 108-010-15, 108-010-16, 108-010-17, 108-010-21, 108-010-23, 108-053-06, 108-053-07, 108-090-02, 108-141-01, 108-211-08, 108-283-04, 108-232-01, and 108-241-03 where there will be no tax and shall the appropriations limit specified in article Xiii-B of the California Constitution (also known as proposition 4) be increased for the West Almanor Community Services District by $100,000 for the 2002/2003 fiscal year, and for three succeeding fiscal years, for the purpose of allowing the district's tax proceeds to be spent for fire protection and emergency medical services.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9656, "fingerprint": "2001|200100007|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100007|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "2b2b99ee13127fca", "measure_id": "200100007", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Upon a two-thirds vote of approval, shall a special tax of $420 per residential parcel per fiscal year and a special tax of $1260.00 per commercial parcel per fiscal year be imposed on each and every above defined parcels within the boundaries of the Whitehawk Ranch Community Services District, excluding those parcels exampt from county property tax? These tax funds will be used for the purpose of funding the services of the volunteer fire department, fire protection and prevention, emergency medical response, and the improvement, operation, management and maintenace of the recreational facilities and amenities to be deeded to the District by Mohawk Valley Ranch, Inc. The tax will commence in the fiscal year starting July 1 2000. The method of collection said tax during the first fiscal year (July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001) will be by statement sent to the owner of record of each above described parcel as of January 1,2001, by first class mail, payable in either one or two installments prior to June 30, 2001. Thereafter, the special tax will be collected and apportioned along with the county property taxes, and the District's appropriations limit (spending limit) under the California Constitution Article XIIIB to be raised by the amount of the annual proceeds of the tax.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71, "no_votes": 5, "total_votes": 76, "percent_yes": 93.42105263157896, "percent_no": 6.578947368421041, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.282276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.910521", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Upon a two-thirds vote of approval, shall a special tax of $420 per residential parcel per fiscal year and a special tax of $1260.00 per commercial parcel per fiscal year be imposed on each and every above defined parcels within the boundaries of the Whitehawk Ranch Community Services District, excluding those parcels exampt from county property tax? These tax funds will be used for the purpose of funding the services of the volunteer fire department, fire protection and prevention, emergency medical response, and the improvement, operation, management and maintenace of the recreational facilities and amenities to be deeded to the District by Mohawk Valley Ranch, Inc. The tax will commence in the fiscal year starting July 1 2000. The method of collection said tax during the first fiscal year (July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001) will be by statement sent to the owner of record of each above described parcel as of January 1,2001, by first class mail, payable in either one or two installments prior to June 30, 2001. Thereafter, the special tax will be collected and apportioned along with the county property taxes, and the District's appropriations limit (spending limit) under the California Constitution Article XIIIB to be raised by the amount of the annual proceeds of the tax.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9659, "fingerprint": "2001|200100092|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100092|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "04282de5a8f1450c", "measure_id": "200100092", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Moreno Valley Community Services District, which oversees Zone L (Library), be authorized to establish an annual parcel fee not to exceed $20 in order to provide funding exclusively for the construction and operation of a state-of-the-art Main Library Building at the Civic Center campus, with the new Library to emphasize technology and provide improved programs for the community, especially school age youth, with such fee revenues lawfully restricted for library uses only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2027, "no_votes": 2541, "total_votes": 4568, "percent_yes": 44.373905429071804, "percent_no": 55.626094570928196, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-07-31", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.283397", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.911075", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Moreno Valley Community Services District, which oversees Zone L (Library), be authorized to establish an annual parcel fee not to exceed $20 in order to provide funding exclusively for the construction and operation of a state-of-the-art Main Library Building at the Civic Center campus, with the new Library to emphasize technology and provide improved programs for the community, especially school age youth, with such fee revenues lawfully restricted for library uses only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12024, "fingerprint": "2001|200100205|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100205|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3a80a3436a78e367", "measure_id": "200100205", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace old, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewers and heating systems; improve electrical systems for efficiency and to safely accommodate technology; relieve severe overcrowding by providing new schools and classrooms; and meet health, safety and educational needs, shall Riverside Unified School District issue not to exceed $175 million of general obligation bonds, with interest rates within the legal limit, to renovate, rehabilitate and construct school facilities, with all expenditures subject to annual, independent audit and citizens' oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16466, "no_votes": 7638, "total_votes": 24104, "percent_yes": 68.31231330899435, "percent_no": 31.687686691005652, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.125838", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.285435", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.912371", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace old, deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewers and heating systems; improve electrical systems for efficiency and to safely accommodate technology; relieve severe overcrowding by providing new schools and classrooms; and meet health, safety and educational needs, shall Riverside Unified School District issue not to exceed $175 million of general obligation bonds, with interest rates within the legal limit, to renovate, rehabilitate and construct school facilities, with all expenditures subject to annual, independent audit and citizens' oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9660, "fingerprint": "2001|200100098|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100098|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8fe0583532021b17", "measure_id": "200100098", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Colton Joint Unified School District repair and renovate existing schools and construct new schools to relieve overcrowding and improve student safety and accessibility by issuing $102 million of bonds at legal interest rates to replace old roofing, upgrade bathrooms, electrical wiring, fire alarm systems, plumbing, sewer systems, and to renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms, school sites and facilities, with independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3884, "no_votes": 1297, "total_votes": 5181, "percent_yes": 74.96622273692337, "percent_no": 25.03377726307663, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-09-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.283752", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.911256", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Colton Joint Unified School District repair and renovate existing schools and construct new schools to relieve overcrowding and improve student safety and accessibility by issuing $102 million of bonds at legal interest rates to replace old roofing, upgrade bathrooms, electrical wiring, fire alarm systems, plumbing, sewer systems, and to renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms, school sites and facilities, with independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9665, "fingerprint": "2001|200100204|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100204|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8558ea56fbb95c88", "measure_id": "200100204", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To fix our aging schools, relieve overcrowding, and keep our children safe by: Repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, Improving school safety and security, Upgrading classroom technology,  Building and expanding science laboratories and libraries,  Building new schools and classrooms, Shall Jurupa Unified School District, serving the community's children, issue $58 million in general obligation bonds, within legal interest rates, with taxpayer safeguards, independent audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2818, "no_votes": 1541, "total_votes": 4359, "percent_yes": 64.64785501261757, "percent_no": 35.35214498738243, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.285165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.912192", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fix our aging schools, relieve overcrowding, and keep our children safe by: Repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and electrical systems, Improving school safety and security, Upgrading classroom technology,  Building and expanding science laboratories and libraries,  Building new schools and classrooms, Shall Jurupa Unified School District, serving the community's children, issue $58 million in general obligation bonds, within legal interest rates, with taxpayer safeguards, independent audits and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9661, "fingerprint": "2001|200100153|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100153|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "6db604c6684e9929", "measure_id": "200100153", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(Advisory) Shall the City use the monies made available because of the 2001 Convention Center refinancing to issue debt to finance downtown parking?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4715, "no_votes": 3302, "total_votes": 8017, "percent_yes": 58.81252338780092, "percent_no": 41.18747661219908, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.284063", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.911438", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Advisory) Shall the City use the monies made available because of the 2001 Convention Center refinancing to issue debt to finance downtown parking?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9662, "fingerprint": "2001|200100154|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100154|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d12acba568a0355c", "measure_id": "200100154", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance be amended to add a section authorizing the City Council to increase the tax on group meeting hotels from 10.8 to a maximum of 12.5 percent and on all other hotels from 10 to a maximum of 11.5 percent with the tax imposed by this section to be paid into the general fund of the City to be used for the usual and current expenses of the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5685, "no_votes": 2305, "total_votes": 7990, "percent_yes": 71.15143929912391, "percent_no": 28.848560700876092, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.284340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.911617", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance be amended to add a section authorizing the City Council to increase the tax on group meeting hotels from 10.8 to a maximum of 12.5 percent and on all other hotels from 10 to a maximum of 11.5 percent with the tax imposed by this section to be paid into the general fund of the City to be used for the usual and current expenses of the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9663, "fingerprint": "2001|200100155|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100155|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "93430ec329ae7ae1", "measure_id": "200100155", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Palm Springs Charter be amended to change the term of each Member of the City Council to commence no later than five days from the Certification of the election results by the City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6459, "no_votes": 1528, "total_votes": 7987, "percent_yes": 80.8689119819707, "percent_no": 19.131088018029303, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.284615", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.911828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Palm Springs Charter be amended to change the term of each Member of the City Council to commence no later than five days from the Certification of the election results by the City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9666, "fingerprint": "2001|200100232|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100232|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "80dca58e861090de", "measure_id": "200100232", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the authorized powers of the Santa Rosa Community Services District be expanded to include the acquisition and maintenance of equestrian and recreational multipurpose trials?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 150, "no_votes": 295, "total_votes": 445, "percent_yes": 33.70786516853932, "percent_no": 66.29213483146069, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-12-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.285765", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.912560", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the authorized powers of the Santa Rosa Community Services District be expanded to include the acquisition and maintenance of equestrian and recreational multipurpose trials?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9664, "fingerprint": "2001|200100203|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100203|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2250acdabea59e43", "measure_id": "200100203", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe classroom overcrowding by constructing new schools and adding classrooms, improve student safety conditions, upgrade electrical wiring for technology, renovate bathrooms, science labs, libraries, school sites and facilities, upgrade lighting and ventilation for energy efficiency, acquire classrooms and school sites, and qualify for State matching funds shall Desert Sands Unified School District with annual audits and citizen oversight issue $450 million of bonds at legal interest rates without increasing existing tax rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12110, "no_votes": 2896, "total_votes": 15006, "percent_yes": 80.70105291216846, "percent_no": 19.298947087831536, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.284892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.912008", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe classroom overcrowding by constructing new schools and adding classrooms, improve student safety conditions, upgrade electrical wiring for technology, renovate bathrooms, science labs, libraries, school sites and facilities, upgrade lighting and ventilation for energy efficiency, acquire classrooms and school sites, and qualify for State matching funds shall Desert Sands Unified School District with annual audits and citizen oversight issue $450 million of bonds at legal interest rates without increasing existing tax rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9667, "fingerprint": "2001|200100102|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100102|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "b8575afc2340020e", "measure_id": "200100102", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Galt Joint Union Elementary School District relieve overcrowding, improve education and increase student safety throughout the district by constructing an elementary and middle school on district owned land, by issuing $9.24 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with citizen oversight, annual audits of expenditures and performance and no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2058, "no_votes": 837, "total_votes": 2895, "percent_yes": 71.0880829015544, "percent_no": 28.9119170984456, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-10-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.286064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.912744", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Galt Joint Union Elementary School District relieve overcrowding, improve education and increase student safety throughout the district by constructing an elementary and middle school on district owned land, by issuing $9.24 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with citizen oversight, annual audits of expenditures and performance and no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9675, "fingerprint": "2001|200100099|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100099|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "8fe0583532021b17", "measure_id": "200100099", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the colton Joint Unified School District repair and renovate existing schools and construct new schools to relieve overcrowding and improve student safety and accessibility by issuing $102 million of bonds at legal interest rates to replace old roofing, upgrade bathrooms, electrical wiring, fire alarm systems, plumbing, sewer systems, and to renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms, school sites and facilities, with independent citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3884, "no_votes": 1297, "total_votes": 5181, "percent_yes": 74.96622273692337, "percent_no": 25.03377726307663, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-09-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.288350", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.914210", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the colton Joint Unified School District repair and renovate existing schools and construct new schools to relieve overcrowding and improve student safety and accessibility by issuing $102 million of bonds at legal interest rates to replace old roofing, upgrade bathrooms, electrical wiring, fire alarm systems, plumbing, sewer systems, and to renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms, school sites and facilities, with independent citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9679, "fingerprint": "2001|200100206|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100206|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d5aa9bbc6344e941", "measure_id": "200100206", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make necessary repairs, upgrades and increase safety/security at Barstow High School, including plumbing, heating, air conditioning, electrical systems, construct additional classrooms, restrooms, a new P.E. building, remove deteriorating buildings, renovate Garver Memorial Auditorium as a multipurpose center for all Barstow residents and reconfigure traffic flow, shall Barstow Unified School District issue 14 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit with citizen oversight and annual audits of expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2492, "no_votes": 1894, "total_votes": 4386, "percent_yes": 56.81714546283629, "percent_no": 43.18285453716371, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.289479", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.914932", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make necessary repairs, upgrades and increase safety/security at Barstow High School, including plumbing, heating, air conditioning, electrical systems, construct additional classrooms, restrooms, a new P.E. building, remove deteriorating buildings, renovate Garver Memorial Auditorium as a multipurpose center for all Barstow residents and reconfigure traffic flow, shall Barstow Unified School District issue 14 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit with citizen oversight and annual audits of expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9680, "fingerprint": "2001|200100207|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100207|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2de4eeb074c3d311", "measure_id": "200100207", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Silver Valley Unified School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 195, "no_votes": 325, "total_votes": 520, "percent_yes": 37.5, "percent_no": 62.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.289747", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.915124", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Silver Valley Unified School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9681, "fingerprint": "2001|200100208|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100208|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "e3b40bbf442511f6", "measure_id": "200100208", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding in elementary schools, to construct, furnish and equip new classrooms and schools, upgrade and add bathrooms, libraries, computer labs and school facilities, to improve safety and security systems and to qualify for approximately $11 million State matching funds, shall Victor Elementary School District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits and citizen oversight to guarantee all money stays in our community to benefit local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3155, "no_votes": 1809, "total_votes": 4964, "percent_yes": 63.55761482675262, "percent_no": 36.44238517324738, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.290011", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.915303", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding in elementary schools, to construct, furnish and equip new classrooms and schools, upgrade and add bathrooms, libraries, computer labs and school facilities, to improve safety and security systems and to qualify for approximately $11 million State matching funds, shall Victor Elementary School District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits and citizen oversight to guarantee all money stays in our community to benefit local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9676, "fingerprint": "2001|200100156|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100156|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1da5501bf4b50706", "measure_id": "200100156", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Mobilehome Park Review Committee Ordinance, which was approved by the voters in November 1983 and codified as Chapter 2.68 of the Municipal Code of the City of Chino, be replaced?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1785, "no_votes": 1085, "total_votes": 2870, "percent_yes": 62.19512195121951, "percent_no": 37.80487804878049, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.288648", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.914391", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mobilehome Park Review Committee Ordinance, which was approved by the voters in November 1983 and codified as Chapter 2.68 of the Municipal Code of the City of Chino, be replaced?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9677, "fingerprint": "2001|200100157|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100157|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "35e0a6b676189f38", "measure_id": "200100157", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Approve a Charter Amendment to permit City officials to be appointed to and serve on Federal or State Commissions or Committees providing such appointment and service is not full-time.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5628, "no_votes": 3116, "total_votes": 8744, "percent_yes": 64.36413540713633, "percent_no": 35.63586459286367, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.288946", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.914571", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approve a Charter Amendment to permit City officials to be appointed to and serve on Federal or State Commissions or Committees providing such appointment and service is not full-time.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9678, "fingerprint": "2001|200100158|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100158|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "da5c76c26a0fe1a8", "measure_id": "200100158", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Approve a Charter Amendment to specifically state that the recommendation and written consent of the City Attorney is required before the Mayor and Common Council can employ and engage legal counsel and the services of such other assistants.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5459, "no_votes": 3592, "total_votes": 9051, "percent_yes": 60.31377748315103, "percent_no": 39.68622251684897, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.289213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.914752", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approve a Charter Amendment to specifically state that the recommendation and written consent of the City Attorney is required before the Mayor and Common Council can employ and engage legal counsel and the services of such other assistants.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9668, "fingerprint": "2001|200100001|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100001|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2aae70c2641b2d13", "measure_id": "200100001", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes levied upon the land within City of Fontana Community Facilities District No. 3 (Hunter's Ridge) be changed to reduce the maximum special tax rate applicable to land use category R-3 2500 from $1239.91 to $500.01 for fiscal year 2000-01, subject to annual increases of 2% per year, in accordance with Resolution No. 2000-95 adopted by the City Council of the City of Fontana on October 17, 2000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1191, "no_votes": 19, "total_votes": 1210, "percent_yes": 98.42975206611573, "percent_no": 1.570247933884275, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-01-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.286336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.912925", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes levied upon the land within City of Fontana Community Facilities District No. 3 (Hunter's Ridge) be changed to reduce the maximum special tax rate applicable to land use category R-3 2500 from $1239.91 to $500.01 for fiscal year 2000-01, subject to annual increases of 2% per year, in accordance with Resolution No. 2000-95 adopted by the City Council of the City of Fontana on October 17, 2000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9669, "fingerprint": "2001|200100025|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100025|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "23b58c1dab21b69c", "measure_id": "200100025", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the zoning of an 11 acre parcel of land--located on west side of Central Avenue between Philadelphia Street and Francis Avenue--from a commercial zone to a multiple residential zone (RD20) limited to senior citizen housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1265, "no_votes": 218, "total_votes": 1483, "percent_yes": 85.30006743088335, "percent_no": 14.699932569116655, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.286608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.913106", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of Chino be amended to change the zoning of an 11 acre parcel of land--located on west side of Central Avenue between Philadelphia Street and Francis Avenue--from a commercial zone to a multiple residential zone (RD20) limited to senior citizen housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9670, "fingerprint": "2001|200100054|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100054|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6c35ff13672d7f85", "measure_id": "200100054", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student/staff safety and relieve overcrowding, shall the School Facilities Improvement District of the Mountain View School District repair, upgrade and make improvements to existing schools, construct additional classrooms, acquire land/build a school to relieve overcrowding, qualify for state grants, upgrade fire alarms, bring schools into compliance with current building safety/health codes, repair/replace electrical systems and plumbing, provide additional computer and science labs, make necessary repairs/upgrades, by issuing $17 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 284, "no_votes": 88, "total_votes": 372, "percent_yes": 76.34408602150538, "percent_no": 23.655913978494624, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-05-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.286914", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.913287", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student/staff safety and relieve overcrowding, shall the School Facilities Improvement District of the Mountain View School District repair, upgrade and make improvements to existing schools, construct additional classrooms, acquire land/build a school to relieve overcrowding, qualify for state grants, upgrade fire alarms, bring schools into compliance with current building safety/health codes, repair/replace electrical systems and plumbing, provide additional computer and science labs, make necessary repairs/upgrades, by issuing $17 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9671, "fingerprint": "2001|200100075|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100075|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "381b16efddd6504f", "measure_id": "200100075", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the formation of the Hesperia Unified Library District within the boundaries of the Hesperia Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1291, "no_votes": 2338, "total_votes": 3629, "percent_yes": 35.57453844034169, "percent_no": 64.42546155965832, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.287211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.913476", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the formation of the Hesperia Unified Library District within the boundaries of the Hesperia Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9672, "fingerprint": "2001|200100076|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100076|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c518ddad3852758a", "measure_id": "200100076", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Hesperia Unified Library District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit, for the purpose of providing funding for acquisition of property and construction of Library District facilities in accordance with Section 18510 of the California Education Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1141, "no_votes": 2484, "total_votes": 3625, "percent_yes": 31.47586206896551, "percent_no": 68.52413793103449, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.287519", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.913661", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Hesperia Unified Library District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit, for the purpose of providing funding for acquisition of property and construction of Library District facilities in accordance with Section 18510 of the California Education Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9673, "fingerprint": "2001|200100077|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100077|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3addd781dc873453", "measure_id": "200100077", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall a parcel tax of $2.74 per month, increasing by 2% annually beginning 2001-2002, be levied to provide funding for Hesperia Unified Library District operating expenses, including but not limited to rents, leases, maintenance contracts, insurance, utilities, furnishings and equipment, text materials and information technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 972, "no_votes": 2644, "total_votes": 3616, "percent_yes": 26.88053097345133, "percent_no": 73.11946902654867, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.287812", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.913845", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a parcel tax of $2.74 per month, increasing by 2% annually beginning 2001-2002, be levied to provide funding for Hesperia Unified Library District operating expenses, including but not limited to rents, leases, maintenance contracts, insurance, utilities, furnishings and equipment, text materials and information technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9674, "fingerprint": "2001|200100078|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100078|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ee4c3628cbd775a8", "measure_id": "200100078", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, renovate and improve all its schools, acquire land and construct one elementary school, construct one middle school, and acquire land for a third high school, thus increasing safety, relieving overcrowding, enhancing educational effectiveness and upgrading school facilities, and to obtain eligibility for State matching funds for construction and renovation, shall the Hesperia Unified School District issue bonds not to exceed $35,000,000, at interest rates  below legal limits with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1301, "no_votes": 2318, "total_votes": 3619, "percent_yes": 35.94915722575297, "percent_no": 64.05084277424703, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.288082", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.914029", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, renovate and improve all its schools, acquire land and construct one elementary school, construct one middle school, and acquire land for a third high school, thus increasing safety, relieving overcrowding, enhancing educational effectiveness and upgrading school facilities, and to obtain eligibility for State matching funds for construction and renovation, shall the Hesperia Unified School District issue bonds not to exceed $35,000,000, at interest rates  below legal limits with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9682, "fingerprint": "2001|200100079|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100079|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "14c2a503b2ad773c", "measure_id": "200100079", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Fallbrook Union Elementary School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and modernize K-8 school facilities, replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems, repair and upgrade science labs, upgrade classroom electrical systems for modern technology, make school health and safety improvements, and make the District eligible to receive approximately $8,000,000 in state-matching funds, by issuing $20,000,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2999, "no_votes": 2430, "total_votes": 5429, "percent_yes": 55.24037575980844, "percent_no": 44.75962424019156, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.290319", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.915488", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Fallbrook Union Elementary School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and modernize K-8 school facilities, replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems, repair and upgrade science labs, upgrade classroom electrical systems for modern technology, make school health and safety improvements, and make the District eligible to receive approximately $8,000,000 in state-matching funds, by issuing $20,000,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9683, "fingerprint": "2001|200100091|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100091|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c5b5127ff60017ea", "measure_id": "200100091", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be approved for an annual increase for fifteen years to the existing Special Benefit Tax for structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 107 - Elfin Forest, beginning July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2015?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 302, "no_votes": 45, "total_votes": 347, "percent_yes": 87.03170028818444, "percent_no": 12.968299711815561, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-07-24", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.290715", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.915672", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be approved for an annual increase for fifteen years to the existing Special Benefit Tax for structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 107 - Elfin Forest, beginning July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2015?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9692, "fingerprint": "2001|200100209|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100209|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "fce6e493a6369881", "measure_id": "200100209", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the San Francisco Community College District issue, at interest rates within legal limits, bonds of $195,000,000 to pay for capital improvements (including facilities to eliminate outdated bungalows; improved disabled accessibility; complete technology network, and new campuses in the Mission and Chinatown/North Beach neighborhoods) further described in the General Obligation Bond Project Report available from the Director of Elections and College?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 91643, "no_votes": 35392, "total_votes": 127035, "percent_yes": 72.13996142795293, "percent_no": 27.860038572047074, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.293210", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.917361", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Francisco Community College District issue, at interest rates within legal limits, bonds of $195,000,000 to pay for capital improvements (including facilities to eliminate outdated bungalows; improved disabled accessibility; complete technology network, and new campuses in the Mission and Chinatown/North Beach neighborhoods) further described in the General Obligation Bond Project Report available from the Director of Elections and College?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9684, "fingerprint": "2001|200100114|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100114|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "48d5102233106262", "measure_id": "200100114", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City and County of San Francisco (or one of its agencies, departments or enterprises) issue revenue bonds and/or other forms of revenue financing in a principal amount not to exceed $100,000,000, to finance the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, installation and/or improvement of solar energy facilities and equipment, energy conservation facilities and equipment and/or renewable energy facilities and equipment for various agencies, departments and/or enterprises of the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92798, "no_votes": 35061, "total_votes": 127859, "percent_yes": 72.57838712957242, "percent_no": 27.42161287042758, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.290983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.915851", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City and County of San Francisco (or one of its agencies, departments or enterprises) issue revenue bonds and/or other forms of revenue financing in a principal amount not to exceed $100,000,000, to finance the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, installation and/or improvement of solar energy facilities and equipment, energy conservation facilities and equipment and/or renewable energy facilities and equipment for various agencies, departments and/or enterprises of the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9685, "fingerprint": "2001|200100115|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100115|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6a052b6243bd6311", "measure_id": "200100115", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the rules for filling vacancies in elective offices be changed to shorten the time that a person appointed to fill a vacant office would serve before there is an election for that office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 92534, "no_votes": 30679, "total_votes": 123213, "percent_yes": 75.10084163197065, "percent_no": 24.899158368029347, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.291265", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.916031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the rules for filling vacancies in elective offices be changed to shorten the time that a person appointed to fill a vacant office would serve before there is an election for that office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9686, "fingerprint": "2001|200100116|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100116|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9b0c0ea4851bc930", "measure_id": "200100116", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall voter approval be required for any City project that would place 100 acres or more of fill in San Francisco Bay?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 94085, "no_votes": 32277, "total_votes": 126362, "percent_yes": 74.45671958341906, "percent_no": 25.54328041658094, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.291534", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.916212", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall voter approval be required for any City project that would place 100 acres or more of fill in San Francisco Bay?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9687, "fingerprint": "2001|200100117|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100117|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "36d6edf1e5eb4372", "measure_id": "200100117", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall there be (1) a new Elections Commission to oversee the Department of Elections; (2) a rule prohibiting City employees outside the Department of Elections from helping with elections without Board of Supervisors approval; (3) new conflict-of-interest rules for the Elections Department, Elections commission, Ethics Commission and City Attorney; (4) a reorganization of the Ethics Commission; and (5) new procedures for City agencies to retain outside legal counsel when the City Attorney has a conflict of interest?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76180, "no_votes": 45319, "total_votes": 121499, "percent_yes": 62.70010452760928, "percent_no": 37.29989547239072, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.291800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.916391", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be (1) a new Elections Commission to oversee the Department of Elections; (2) a rule prohibiting City employees outside the Department of Elections from helping with elections without Board of Supervisors approval; (3) new conflict-of-interest rules for the Elections Department, Elections commission, Ethics Commission and City Attorney; (4) a reorganization of the Ethics Commission; and (5) new procedures for City agencies to retain outside legal counsel when the City Attorney has a conflict of interest?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9688, "fingerprint": "2001|200100118|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100118|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6df7897cac064d6b", "measure_id": "200100118", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission be replaced with a new Municipal Water and Power Agency, governed by an elected board, whose goals would be to provide electricity to San Francisco and to develop renewable energy and conservation projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64405, "no_votes": 64921, "total_votes": 129326, "percent_yes": 49.80050415229729, "percent_no": 50.19949584770271, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.292111", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.916575", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission be replaced with a new Municipal Water and Power Agency, governed by an elected board, whose goals would be to provide electricity to San Francisco and to develop renewable energy and conservation projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9689, "fingerprint": "2001|200100119|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100119|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "984c964ba20518da", "measure_id": "200100119", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the rules for redrawing Board of Supervisors district lines be changed to require the use of adjusted census data and to establish deadlines for beginning and completing redistricting?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 67913, "no_votes": 53450, "total_votes": 121363, "percent_yes": 55.958570569283886, "percent_no": 44.041429430716114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.292410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.916787", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the rules for redrawing Board of Supervisors district lines be changed to require the use of adjusted census data and to establish deadlines for beginning and completing redistricting?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9690, "fingerprint": "2001|200100120|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100120|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "c8e8bb9c0d2ec70a", "measure_id": "200100120", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the list of projects for which the City may issue revenue bonds without voter approval be expanded to include renewable energy facilities, such as solar power systems, and energy conservation facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68393, "no_votes": 58493, "total_votes": 126886, "percent_yes": 53.901139605630256, "percent_no": 46.098860394369744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.292681", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.916985", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the list of projects for which the City may issue revenue bonds without voter approval be expanded to include renewable energy facilities, such as solar power systems, and energy conservation facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9691, "fingerprint": "2001|200100121|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100121|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "36f4b5d75be72ca9", "measure_id": "200100121", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the \"San Francisco-Brisbane Municipal Utility District\" be created and established?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60227, "no_votes": 64583, "total_votes": 124810, "percent_yes": 48.25494752023075, "percent_no": 51.74505247976925, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.292947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.917174", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \"San Francisco-Brisbane Municipal Utility District\" be created and established?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9693, "fingerprint": "2001|200100040|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100040|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "68fe423270b0635b", "measure_id": "200100040", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize or otherwise improve District facilities, including classrooms, restrooms, the library, the multipurpose room and the District administrative office; to relocate and upgrade the computer laboratory; and to acquire replacement classroom space, shall the Banta Elementary School District issue bonds in the amount of $1,420,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 135, "no_votes": 74, "total_votes": 209, "percent_yes": 64.5933014354067, "percent_no": 35.4066985645933, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.293476", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.917548", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize or otherwise improve District facilities, including classrooms, restrooms, the library, the multipurpose room and the District administrative office; to relocate and upgrade the computer laboratory; and to acquire replacement classroom space, shall the Banta Elementary School District issue bonds in the amount of $1,420,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9694, "fingerprint": "2001|200100103|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100103|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "b8575afc2340020e", "measure_id": "200100103", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Galt Joint Union Elementary School District relieve overcrowding, improve education and increase student safety throughout the district by constructing an elementary and middle school on district owned land, by issuing $9.24 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with citizen oversight, annual audits of expenditures and performance and no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78, "no_votes": 54, "total_votes": 132, "percent_yes": 59.09090909090909, "percent_no": 40.90909090909091, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-10-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.293745", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.917738", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Galt Joint Union Elementary School District relieve overcrowding, improve education and increase student safety throughout the district by constructing an elementary and middle school on district owned land, by issuing $9.24 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with citizen oversight, annual audits of expenditures and performance and no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12028, "fingerprint": "2001|200100122|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100122|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "671b8dfb8014631b", "measure_id": "200100122", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter of the County of San Mateo be amended to provide that the positions of Coroner and Sheriff shall be combined and that the new position of Sheriff-Coroner shall be elected?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33442, "no_votes": 52907, "total_votes": 86349, "percent_yes": 38.7288793153366, "percent_no": 61.2711206846634, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.137566", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.296753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.919583", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the County of San Mateo be amended to provide that the positions of Coroner and Sheriff shall be combined and that the new position of Sheriff-Coroner shall be elected?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12027, "fingerprint": "2001|200100081|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100081|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b9167012b274ea2e", "measure_id": "200100081", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete modernization of local high schools approved by voters in 1996, shall Sequoia Union High School District issue $88,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit for real property improvements and acquisitions including: to accommodate enrollment growth and evolving needs such as smaller high schools; repairing deteriorating restrooms, electrical, plumbing and other systems; removing asbestos; earthquake safety improvements; and building classrooms, science labs, technology/vocational training facilities; parent/student centers, and athletic and performing arts centers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16903, "no_votes": 8878, "total_votes": 25781, "percent_yes": 65.56378728521004, "percent_no": 34.43621271478996, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.137365", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.296485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.919397", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete modernization of local high schools approved by voters in 1996, shall Sequoia Union High School District issue $88,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit for real property improvements and acquisitions including: to accommodate enrollment growth and evolving needs such as smaller high schools; repairing deteriorating restrooms, electrical, plumbing and other systems; removing asbestos; earthquake safety improvements; and building classrooms, science labs, technology/vocational training facilities; parent/student centers, and athletic and performing arts centers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9697, "fingerprint": "2001|200100042|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100042|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a6357ae60a0be0ca", "measure_id": "200100042", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and enhance educational excellence, high academic standards, class size reductions, quality programs and retain outstanding teachers, shall the Woodside Elementary School district continue its current special tax of $196 beginning July 1, 2001 for eight (8) years adjusted annually by changes in the Consumer Price Index, not to exceed 4% annually, to increase the District's appropriations limit accordingly, with exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons sixty-five (65) years of age and older.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 897, "no_votes": 246, "total_votes": 1143, "percent_yes": 78.4776902887139, "percent_no": 21.5223097112861, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.294676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.918292", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and enhance educational excellence, high academic standards, class size reductions, quality programs and retain outstanding teachers, shall the Woodside Elementary School district continue its current special tax of $196 beginning July 1, 2001 for eight (8) years adjusted annually by changes in the Consumer Price Index, not to exceed 4% annually, to increase the District's appropriations limit accordingly, with exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons sixty-five (65) years of age and older.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12029, "fingerprint": "2001|200100123|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100123|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "d02445d1c1583205", "measure_id": "200100123", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 3268, adopted by the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors on October 2, 1990, which increased from 8% to 10% the  transient occupancy tax charged to persons for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel, or similar structure occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by transients, in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County, be continued in full force and effect?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49160, "no_votes": 37084, "total_votes": 86244, "percent_yes": 57.00106674087473, "percent_no": 42.99893325912527, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.137777", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.297022", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.919767", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 3268, adopted by the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors on October 2, 1990, which increased from 8% to 10% the  transient occupancy tax charged to persons for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel, or similar structure occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by transients, in the unincorporated area of San Mateo County, be continued in full force and effect?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12026, "fingerprint": "2001|200100080|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100080|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c1a073ab3e005822", "measure_id": "200100080", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve academic performance, attract qualified teachers, improve/maintain instructional programs/technology/classrooms, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores School District impose a qualified special tax of $184/year/taxable parcel (with exemptions for parcels owned/occupied by persons 65 years of age or older upon application) for ten years, at a rate of $92 on July 1, 2001, and $184 by July 1, 2002, adjusted annually by CPI, and shall the District's appropriations limit be raised by such amount each year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3300, "no_votes": 2301, "total_votes": 5601, "percent_yes": 58.91805034815212, "percent_no": 41.08194965184788, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.137162", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.296210", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.919212", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve academic performance, attract qualified teachers, improve/maintain instructional programs/technology/classrooms, shall Belmont-Redwood Shores School District impose a qualified special tax of $184/year/taxable parcel (with exemptions for parcels owned/occupied by persons 65 years of age or older upon application) for ten years, at a rate of $92 on July 1, 2001, and $184 by July 1, 2002, adjusted annually by CPI, and shall the District's appropriations limit be raised by such amount each year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9696, "fingerprint": "2001|200100041|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100041|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "375fee751df9d348", "measure_id": "200100041", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers, develop technology instruction for students, continue to offer specialized programs and maintain small classes, shall the Burlingame School District be authorized to impose a replacement qualified special tax at a rate of $365.00 per year beginning 7/1/2001, adjusted annually by changes in the Consumer Price Index, to increase the District's appropriations limit accordingly, with exemptions for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age and older.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3271, "no_votes": 2379, "total_votes": 5650, "percent_yes": 57.89380530973452, "percent_no": 42.10619469026548, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.294401", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.918108", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain highly qualified teachers, develop technology instruction for students, continue to offer specialized programs and maintain small classes, shall the Burlingame School District be authorized to impose a replacement qualified special tax at a rate of $365.00 per year beginning 7/1/2001, adjusted annually by changes in the Consumer Price Index, to increase the District's appropriations limit accordingly, with exemptions for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age and older.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12033, "fingerprint": "2001|200100215|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100215|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b57354d8e1f68816", "measure_id": "200100215", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare College of San Mateo, Ca\u00f1ada and skyline College students for universities and contemporary jobs; upgrade science and computer labs; modernize classrooms and occupational facilities; fix leaking roofs; improve handicapped accessibility; make seismic/safety improvements; finish energy conservation projects; make other property acquisitions and improvements; as specified in the Bond Projects List; shall San Mateo County Community College District issue $207,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58530, "no_votes": 30678, "total_votes": 89208, "percent_yes": 65.6107075598601, "percent_no": 34.3892924401399, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.141380", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.301608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.922682", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare College of San Mateo, Ca\u00f1ada and skyline College students for universities and contemporary jobs; upgrade science and computer labs; modernize classrooms and occupational facilities; fix leaking roofs; improve handicapped accessibility; make seismic/safety improvements; finish energy conservation projects; make other property acquisitions and improvements; as specified in the Bond Projects List; shall San Mateo County Community College District issue $207,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to perform audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12025, "fingerprint": "2001|200100068|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100068|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "dec90bbba021cd49", "measure_id": "200100068", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To qualify for State or other library matching funds, provide space for more books, periodicals, reference materials, update wiring for computers/technology, expand children's study/reading areas, increase computer terminals, ensure earthquake safety, provide adequate seating and lighting, shall the City issue $10.6 million of bonds at tax-exempt interest rates to build a new Millbrae Community Library and related improvements, subject to guaranteed annual audits, a citizen's oversight committee, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2358, "no_votes": 1052, "total_votes": 3410, "percent_yes": 69.14956011730206, "percent_no": 30.85043988269794, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.136555", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.295239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.918657", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify for State or other library matching funds, provide space for more books, periodicals, reference materials, update wiring for computers/technology, expand children's study/reading areas, increase computer terminals, ensure earthquake safety, provide adequate seating and lighting, shall the City issue $10.6 million of bonds at tax-exempt interest rates to build a new Millbrae Community Library and related improvements, subject to guaranteed annual audits, a citizen's oversight committee, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9695, "fingerprint": "2001|200100026|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100026|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5eeccecae42cecdc", "measure_id": "200100026", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To qualify for State or other library improvement matching funds to build a new community library, wired for computers, with adequate space for books, children's activities, community meetings, and make surrounding site improvements, shall Belmont Community Facilities District No. 2000-1 issue $8,650,000 of bonds, levy special taxes to pay for facilities, maintenance, incidental expenses, including debt service; and establish the District's annual appropriations limit equal to $8,650,000 as provided in Resolutions 8917 and 8918?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3416, "no_votes": 959, "total_votes": 4375, "percent_yes": 78.08, "percent_no": 21.92, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.294047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.917922", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To qualify for State or other library improvement matching funds to build a new community library, wired for computers, with adequate space for books, children's activities, community meetings, and make surrounding site improvements, shall Belmont Community Facilities District No. 2000-1 issue $8,650,000 of bonds, levy special taxes to pay for facilities, maintenance, incidental expenses, including debt service; and establish the District's annual appropriations limit equal to $8,650,000 as provided in Resolutions 8917 and 8918?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12031, "fingerprint": "2001|200100212|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100212|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "404a8706845cf23e", "measure_id": "200100212", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain educational excellence and high academic standards; keep class sizes small; provide salaries which retain and attract the best teachers available; improve reading and writing skills; provide computer access for all students; offer music, art and foreign language instruction; shall the Las Lomitas School District's Qualified Special Tax be reauthorized at a rate of $196 per year per taxable parcel beginning July 1, 2002, for 6 years, with exemptions for qualifying persons aged 65 or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2323, "no_votes": 748, "total_votes": 3071, "percent_yes": 75.64311299251058, "percent_no": 24.35688700748942, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.140549", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.300668", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.922136", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain educational excellence and high academic standards; keep class sizes small; provide salaries which retain and attract the best teachers available; improve reading and writing skills; provide computer access for all students; offer music, art and foreign language instruction; shall the Las Lomitas School District's Qualified Special Tax be reauthorized at a rate of $196 per year per taxable parcel beginning July 1, 2002, for 6 years, with exemptions for qualifying persons aged 65 or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9699, "fingerprint": "2001|200100069|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100069|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "51f4bc76070a36de", "measure_id": "200100069", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide space for children's programs and materials, full access for seniors and the disabled, expanded space for books and computers for public use, local history displays, community meeting rooms, and sufficient parking, while coordinating with local schools to provide educational opportunities, shall the City issue general obligation bonds to construct a Library/Community Center in an amount not to exceed $14 million, with fiscal accountability per law and input from a citizens advisory committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3355, "no_votes": 2561, "total_votes": 5916, "percent_yes": 56.710615280595, "percent_no": 43.289384719405, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.295528", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.918843", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide space for children's programs and materials, full access for seniors and the disabled, expanded space for books and computers for public use, local history displays, community meeting rooms, and sufficient parking, while coordinating with local schools to provide educational opportunities, shall the City issue general obligation bonds to construct a Library/Community Center in an amount not to exceed $14 million, with fiscal accountability per law and input from a citizens advisory committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12032, "fingerprint": "2001|200100213|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100213|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "14dbb685b05dd936", "measure_id": "200100213", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete the repair of older classrooms and buildings, complete renovations and modernizations at La Entrada and Las Lomitas Schools, upgrade computer labs and computers, provide equipment for science labs, construct, furnish and equip school facilities, improve electrical wiring for technology, upgrade playgrounds, and make other improvements, shall the Las Lomitas Elementary School District issue $12 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform financial and performance audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2299, "no_votes": 758, "total_votes": 3057, "percent_yes": 75.20444880601897, "percent_no": 24.795551193981026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.140836", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.300972", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.922319", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete the repair of older classrooms and buildings, complete renovations and modernizations at La Entrada and Las Lomitas Schools, upgrade computer labs and computers, provide equipment for science labs, construct, furnish and equip school facilities, improve electrical wiring for technology, upgrade playgrounds, and make other improvements, shall the Las Lomitas Elementary School District issue $12 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform financial and performance audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9700, "fingerprint": "2001|200100070|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100070|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b435ca5926d72207", "measure_id": "200100070", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To provide affordable senior housing, quality restaurant and hotel space, parks, transportation improvements, and removal of existing toxics at no cost to taxpayers, shall the height limit on the 20-acre Navy site across from Tanforan on El Camino Real be set at seven stories (90 feet) for hotel space, six stories (75 feet) for senior housing, five stories (70 feet) for apartments and offices, 35 feet for parking structure, complying with city development requirements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4257, "no_votes": 1663, "total_votes": 5920, "percent_yes": 71.90878378378378, "percent_no": 28.091216216216225, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.295840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.919025", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide affordable senior housing, quality restaurant and hotel space, parks, transportation improvements, and removal of existing toxics at no cost to taxpayers, shall the height limit on the 20-acre Navy site across from Tanforan on El Camino Real be set at seven stories (90 feet) for hotel space, six stories (75 feet) for senior housing, five stories (70 feet) for apartments and offices, 35 feet for parking structure, complying with city development requirements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12030, "fingerprint": "2001|200100210|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100210|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "af539197a0339401", "measure_id": "200100210", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain qualified teachers, improve and maintain instructional programs and small class size, shall Burlingame Elementary School District increase its current parcel tax to $297/year/taxable parcel, with a cost of living increase of not more than 4% per year (with exemptions for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years or older) for eight years beginning July 1, 2002, and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be raised by such amount?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4022, "no_votes": 2499, "total_votes": 6521, "percent_yes": 61.67765680110413, "percent_no": 38.32234319889587, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.140005", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.300059", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.921767", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain qualified teachers, improve and maintain instructional programs and small class size, shall Burlingame Elementary School District increase its current parcel tax to $297/year/taxable parcel, with a cost of living increase of not more than 4% per year (with exemptions for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years or older) for eight years beginning July 1, 2002, and shall the District's annual appropriations limit be raised by such amount?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9698, "fingerprint": "2001|200100067|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100067|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "7d8e2cb43c33d6d0", "measure_id": "200100067", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance of the Town of Atherton Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax for Municipal Services and Capital Improvements and for the Expenditure of Funds Derived from such Tax,\" and numbered 520 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1275, "no_votes": 619, "total_votes": 1894, "percent_yes": 67.31784582893347, "percent_no": 32.68215417106653, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.294969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.918475", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance of the Town of Atherton Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax for Municipal Services and Capital Improvements and for the Expenditure of Funds Derived from such Tax,\" and numbered 520 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9713, "fingerprint": "2001|200100216|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100216|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "53db7864b2bae1ab", "measure_id": "200100216", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete the renovation of classrooms, science labs, and libraries; complete seismic upgrades; build classrooms and other facilities; and for basic modernization of school buildings including replacing deteriorating electrical, heating, plumbing, and other critical systems; shall the Sequoia Union High School District issue $88 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to improve school sites as specified in the District's Project List, subject to specified accountability measures including a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23927, "no_votes": 11156, "total_votes": 35083, "percent_yes": 68.20112305105036, "percent_no": 31.79887694894964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.301912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.922884", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete the renovation of classrooms, science labs, and libraries; complete seismic upgrades; build classrooms and other facilities; and for basic modernization of school buildings including replacing deteriorating electrical, heating, plumbing, and other critical systems; shall the Sequoia Union High School District issue $88 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to improve school sites as specified in the District's Project List, subject to specified accountability measures including a Citizens' Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9711, "fingerprint": "2001|200100211|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100211|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2204a42442006f55", "measure_id": "200100211", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide elementary school students with warm, safe, dry classrooms that are conducive to learning, by renovating and modernizing the school buildings in the Jefferson Elementary School District, including replacing old, inefficient heating and ventilating systems, aging plumbing and restrooms, out-dated electrical systems, and other acquisition or construction of or improvements to school buildings and grounds, shall the Jefferson Elementary School District issue $52,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3829, "no_votes": 1768, "total_votes": 5597, "percent_yes": 68.41164909773093, "percent_no": 31.58835090226907, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.300364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.921951", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide elementary school students with warm, safe, dry classrooms that are conducive to learning, by renovating and modernizing the school buildings in the Jefferson Elementary School District, including replacing old, inefficient heating and ventilating systems, aging plumbing and restrooms, out-dated electrical systems, and other acquisition or construction of or improvements to school buildings and grounds, shall the Jefferson Elementary School District issue $52,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9712, "fingerprint": "2001|200100214|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100214|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "834c7b24bfa154a0", "measure_id": "200100214", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to improve schools by financing renovations and modernization projects at Corte Madera and Ormondale schools; adding classrooms for science, art, music and performing arts and special education; and improving handicapped access; shall the Portola Valley Elementary School District issue $6 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit for projects specified in the District's Bond Project List, subject to specified accountability measures, including a Citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures and review independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1823, "no_votes": 660, "total_votes": 2483, "percent_yes": 73.4192509061619, "percent_no": 26.580749093838094, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.301330", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.922501", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to improve schools by financing renovations and modernization projects at Corte Madera and Ormondale schools; adding classrooms for science, art, music and performing arts and special education; and improving handicapped access; shall the Portola Valley Elementary School District issue $6 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit for projects specified in the District's Bond Project List, subject to specified accountability measures, including a Citizen's Oversight Committee to monitor bond expenditures and review independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9709, "fingerprint": "2001|200100167|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100167|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "146cf598f4804e82", "measure_id": "200100167", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance Amending Chapter 5.04 of the San Carlos Municipal Code, setting the categories and rates for the Business Registration Tax be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3475, "no_votes": 1465, "total_votes": 4940, "percent_yes": 70.34412955465586, "percent_no": 29.655870445344135, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.299529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.921402", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance Amending Chapter 5.04 of the San Carlos Municipal Code, setting the categories and rates for the Business Registration Tax be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9710, "fingerprint": "2001|200100168|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100168|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9c75495cd9535d9b", "measure_id": "200100168", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted confirming and approving a previously authorized increase in the South San Francisco commercial parking facility business license tax, which is a tax that applies only to the gross receipts received by commercial parking companies, from four percent of gross receipts to eight percent of gross receipts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3456, "no_votes": 2635, "total_votes": 6091, "percent_yes": 56.73945164997537, "percent_no": 43.26054835002463, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.299795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.921581", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted confirming and approving a previously authorized increase in the South San Francisco commercial parking facility business license tax, which is a tax that applies only to the gross receipts received by commercial parking companies, from four percent of gross receipts to eight percent of gross receipts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9708, "fingerprint": "2001|200100166|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100166|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5d2e09bbaacf04c4", "measure_id": "200100166", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1531 adopted by the San Bruno City Council on July 22, 1991 which increased from 8% to 10% the Transient Occupancy Tax charged to person for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel or motel in the City of San Bruno be continued in full force effect?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3280, "no_votes": 1965, "total_votes": 5245, "percent_yes": 62.53574833174452, "percent_no": 37.46425166825548, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.299261", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.921219", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1531 adopted by the San Bruno City Council on July 22, 1991 which increased from 8% to 10% the Transient Occupancy Tax charged to person for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel or motel in the City of San Bruno be continued in full force effect?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9705, "fingerprint": "2001|200100163|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100163|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2deb15bfd0b31f7b", "measure_id": "200100163", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 573 adopted by the Millbrae City Council on June 11, 1991 which increased from 8% to 10% the Transient Occupancy Tax charged to persons for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel or motel in the City of Millbrae be continued in full force and effect?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2857, "no_votes": 844, "total_votes": 3701, "percent_yes": 77.19535260740341, "percent_no": 22.804647392596593, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.298358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.920671", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 573 adopted by the Millbrae City Council on June 11, 1991 which increased from 8% to 10% the Transient Occupancy Tax charged to persons for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel or motel in the City of Millbrae be continued in full force and effect?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9701, "fingerprint": "2001|200100159|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100159|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "63893f081591475e", "measure_id": "200100159", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the Burlingame Municipal Code to sustain and continue an increase in the transient occupancy tax rate from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%) on the rent charged hotel guests within the City of Burlingame be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4284, "no_votes": 1657, "total_votes": 5941, "percent_yes": 72.10907254670931, "percent_no": 27.890927453290686, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.297293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.919948", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the Burlingame Municipal Code to sustain and continue an increase in the transient occupancy tax rate from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%) on the rent charged hotel guests within the City of Burlingame be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9702, "fingerprint": "2001|200100160|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100160|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "edc820eebc4de7ce", "measure_id": "200100160", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the Burlingame Municipal Code to sustain and continue an increase in the general business license tax rate from $50 per year to $100 per year within the City of Burlingame be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4006, "no_votes": 1926, "total_votes": 5932, "percent_yes": 67.53202966958867, "percent_no": 32.46797033041133, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.297561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.920128", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the Burlingame Municipal Code to sustain and continue an increase in the general business license tax rate from $50 per year to $100 per year within the City of Burlingame be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9703, "fingerprint": "2001|200100161|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100161|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a71712db576e72dc", "measure_id": "200100161", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the Municipal Code to establish a business license tax of five percent (5%) of gross receipts on operators of commercial parking facilities within the City of Burlingame be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4080, "no_votes": 1770, "total_votes": 5850, "percent_yes": 69.74358974358974, "percent_no": 30.256410256410263, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.297827", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.920308", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the Municipal Code to establish a business license tax of five percent (5%) of gross receipts on operators of commercial parking facilities within the City of Burlingame be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9706, "fingerprint": "2001|200100164|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100164|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "cda92b174e125eaf", "measure_id": "200100164", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Portola Valley adjust the appropriations limit of the Town each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2002 by the amount of money collected from the existing 5.5% Utility Users Tax during the time of its levy and collection, provided that the authorization to so adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed four (4) years from the end of Fiscal Year 2001-2002?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1226, "no_votes": 444, "total_votes": 1670, "percent_yes": 73.41317365269461, "percent_no": 26.58682634730539, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.298657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.920850", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Portola Valley adjust the appropriations limit of the Town each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2002 by the amount of money collected from the existing 5.5% Utility Users Tax during the time of its levy and collection, provided that the authorization to so adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed four (4) years from the end of Fiscal Year 2001-2002?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9707, "fingerprint": "2001|200100165|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100165|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "cbf02aa6f3e1cecb", "measure_id": "200100165", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If, an only if, Town of Portola Valley's Proposition R, which adjusts the Town's appropriation limit passes, shall the Town of Portola Valley adjust the appropriations limit of the Town each fiscal year commencing 7/1/02 by amount of money collected from the imposition of the 2% Utility Users Tax (for open space only) during the time of its levy and collection, provided that the authorization to adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed 4 years from the end of Fiscal Year 2001/2002?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1228, "no_votes": 425, "total_votes": 1653, "percent_yes": 74.28917120387175, "percent_no": 25.710828796128254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.298989", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.921031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If, an only if, Town of Portola Valley's Proposition R, which adjusts the Town's appropriation limit passes, shall the Town of Portola Valley adjust the appropriations limit of the Town each fiscal year commencing 7/1/02 by amount of money collected from the imposition of the 2% Utility Users Tax (for open space only) during the time of its levy and collection, provided that the authorization to adjust the appropriations limit shall not exceed 4 years from the end of Fiscal Year 2001/2002?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9704, "fingerprint": "2001|200100162|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100162|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a6f4060e9c5dc44c", "measure_id": "200100162", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To renovate and expand the City's parks and recreation facilities, shall the City of Menlo Park be authorized to issue $38,000,000 in General Obligation Bonds phased over several years for construction, acquisition, and improvement of such facilities and all costs incident thereto; provided, that at the time any bond is issued, the highest tax rate required to service all bonds authorized by this measure and issued shall not be in excess of $14 per $100,000 in assessed value?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3842, "no_votes": 1604, "total_votes": 5446, "percent_yes": 70.54719059860449, "percent_no": 29.452809401395513, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.298095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.920487", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and expand the City's parks and recreation facilities, shall the City of Menlo Park be authorized to issue $38,000,000 in General Obligation Bonds phased over several years for construction, acquisition, and improvement of such facilities and all costs incident thereto; provided, that at the time any bond is issued, the highest tax rate required to service all bonds authorized by this measure and issued shall not be in excess of $14 per $100,000 in assessed value?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9714, "fingerprint": "2001|200100008|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100008|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "57311d96c155eda1", "measure_id": "200100008", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the order adopted on November 14, 2000 by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara ordering the formation of the Orcutt Community Services District and detachment from County Service Area No. 5 be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order, including the authorization of a special tax as described?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1462, "no_votes": 4959, "total_votes": 6421, "percent_yes": 22.769039090484338, "percent_no": 77.23096090951566, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.302182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.923070", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on November 14, 2000 by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara ordering the formation of the Orcutt Community Services District and detachment from County Service Area No. 5 be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order, including the authorization of a special tax as described?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9715, "fingerprint": "2001|200100169|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100169|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "a0113f932cee9d74", "measure_id": "200100169", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on July 10, 2001 by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara ordering the incorporation of territory described in the order and designated in the order as LAFCO No. 99-20, Incorporation of the City of Goleta, be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4216, "no_votes": 3057, "total_votes": 7273, "percent_yes": 57.96782620651726, "percent_no": 42.03217379348274, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.302487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.923251", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on July 10, 2001 by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara ordering the incorporation of territory described in the order and designated in the order as LAFCO No. 99-20, Incorporation of the City of Goleta, be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12038, "fingerprint": "2001|200100173|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100173|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "09c2e98258a37edc", "measure_id": "200100173", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council of the City of Los Altos be authorized, annually, to set the rate of the Transient Occupancy Tax of the City at a rate not to exceed 11%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2958, "no_votes": 894, "total_votes": 3852, "percent_yes": 76.79127725856698, "percent_no": 23.20872274143302, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.144531", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.305418", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.925171", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council of the City of Los Altos be authorized, annually, to set the rate of the Transient Occupancy Tax of the City at a rate not to exceed 11%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12034, "fingerprint": "2001|200100083|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100083|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b32e00ba7edb230b", "measure_id": "200100083", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, repair local schools and improve student safety, shall Franklin-McKinley Elementary School District acquire, repair, construct, and upgrade school district land and facilities, including adding classrooms to existing schools to reduce overcrowding, construct two new elementary schools and a multiuse community center, by issuing $18 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit, with citizen oversight, and annual audits with no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1640, "no_votes": 356, "total_votes": 1996, "percent_yes": 82.16432865731463, "percent_no": 17.835671342685373, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.143118", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.303403", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.923797", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, repair local schools and improve student safety, shall Franklin-McKinley Elementary School District acquire, repair, construct, and upgrade school district land and facilities, including adding classrooms to existing schools to reduce overcrowding, construct two new elementary schools and a multiuse community center, by issuing $18 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit, with citizen oversight, and annual audits with no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9716, "fingerprint": "2001|200100043|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100043|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e8ed64b8be4330d3", "measure_id": "200100043", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve children's academic performance, reduce class size, improve teaching quality, and expand art, science, music, technology, and physical education; shall the Cambrian School district be authorized to impose a benefit assessment up to $63 per parcel effective July 1,2001, adjusted annually by changes in the Consumer Price Index, to increase the District's Appropriations Limit accordingly, annually reviewed by an oversight committee with exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1868, "no_votes": 853, "total_votes": 2721, "percent_yes": 68.65123116501286, "percent_no": 31.34876883498714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.302805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.923432", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve children's academic performance, reduce class size, improve teaching quality, and expand art, science, music, technology, and physical education; shall the Cambrian School district be authorized to impose a benefit assessment up to $63 per parcel effective July 1,2001, adjusted annually by changes in the Consumer Price Index, to increase the District's Appropriations Limit accordingly, annually reviewed by an oversight committee with exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12036, "fingerprint": "2001|200100171|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100171|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "7e57c4dd95811b38", "measure_id": "200100171", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 601 of the City Charter be amended to change the vote requirement, from a unanimous vote of the City Council to waive the reading of a proposed ordinance in full, to a majority vote to be consistent with state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2735, "no_votes": 1102, "total_votes": 3837, "percent_yes": 71.27964555642428, "percent_no": 28.720354443575715, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.144129", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.304876", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.924804", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 601 of the City Charter be amended to change the vote requirement, from a unanimous vote of the City Council to waive the reading of a proposed ordinance in full, to a majority vote to be consistent with state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9719, "fingerprint": "2001|200100085|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100085|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8ee44d85965ee791", "measure_id": "200100085", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate 40-50 year old neighborhood schools, improve student safety conditions, relieve classroom overcrowding, and quality for State matching funds, shall the Los Gatos Union Elementary School District, with annual audits/citizen oversight, replace leaking roofs, fix bathrooms and replace aging plumbing, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate technology, renovate science labs and libraries, modernize school facilities, acquire/construct classrooms, replace againg ventilation systems, remove asbestos, and improve school sites by issuing $91 million of bonds, at legal interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4615, "no_votes": 828, "total_votes": 5443, "percent_yes": 84.78780084512218, "percent_no": 15.212199154877823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.303997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.924158", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate 40-50 year old neighborhood schools, improve student safety conditions, relieve classroom overcrowding, and quality for State matching funds, shall the Los Gatos Union Elementary School District, with annual audits/citizen oversight, replace leaking roofs, fix bathrooms and replace aging plumbing, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate technology, renovate science labs and libraries, modernize school facilities, acquire/construct classrooms, replace againg ventilation systems, remove asbestos, and improve school sites by issuing $91 million of bonds, at legal interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12037, "fingerprint": "2001|200100172|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100172|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1bdb2866b9a12c40", "measure_id": "200100172", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1403 be added to the City Charter to require that the election of the Mayor shall require a majority of the votes cast at said election to constitute the choice of the electors, and if no candidate receives a majority of the votes cast, a runoff election between the two candidates receiving the highest numbers of the votes cast, or in case of a tie, among those candidates tying for the highest number of votes cast, shall be called by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1490, "no_votes": 2424, "total_votes": 3914, "percent_yes": 38.06847215125191, "percent_no": 61.93152784874809, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.144332", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.305151", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.924989", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1403 be added to the City Charter to require that the election of the Mayor shall require a majority of the votes cast at said election to constitute the choice of the electors, and if no candidate receives a majority of the votes cast, a runoff election between the two candidates receiving the highest numbers of the votes cast, or in case of a tie, among those candidates tying for the highest number of votes cast, shall be called by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9717, "fingerprint": "2001|200100082|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100082|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "901c76abce88644c", "measure_id": "200100082", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding, repair, renovate, and maintain neighborhood schools, and quality for state matching funds, shall the Cupertino Union School District issue eighty million dollars in bonds at interest rates not exceeding the legal limit to build or acquire school facilities and a new middle school; renovate, repair, and maintain facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs, heating, ventilation, electrical systems, restrooms and plumb ing; remove asbestos and other hazardous materials; and bring schools up to current safety standards?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11117, "no_votes": 3743, "total_votes": 14860, "percent_yes": 74.81157469717363, "percent_no": 25.188425302826374, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.303133", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.923615", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding, repair, renovate, and maintain neighborhood schools, and quality for state matching funds, shall the Cupertino Union School District issue eighty million dollars in bonds at interest rates not exceeding the legal limit to build or acquire school facilities and a new middle school; renovate, repair, and maintain facilities; repair or replace leaky roofs, heating, ventilation, electrical systems, restrooms and plumb ing; remove asbestos and other hazardous materials; and bring schools up to current safety standards?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12035, "fingerprint": "2001|200100170|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100170|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ad2a519c534a0b23", "measure_id": "200100170", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the reorganization order adopted on July 16, 2001, by the Cupertino City Council be confirmed? The reorganization would affect the unincorporated area of Garden Gate and provide for (1) the annexation of about 107 acres of territory known as Garden Gate to the City of Cupertino; and (2) the detachment of the same territory from the Santa Clara County Lighting Service Area.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 187, "no_votes": 150, "total_votes": 337, "percent_yes": 55.48961424332344, "percent_no": 44.51038575667656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.143926", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.304587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.924615", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the reorganization order adopted on July 16, 2001, by the Cupertino City Council be confirmed? The reorganization would affect the unincorporated area of Garden Gate and provide for (1) the annexation of about 107 acres of territory known as Garden Gate to the City of Cupertino; and (2) the detachment of the same territory from the Santa Clara County Lighting Service Area.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9720, "fingerprint": "2001|200100086|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100086|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "685639ebaa868e99", "measure_id": "200100086", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To attract and retain qualified and experienced teachers and school employees, maintain educational programs that enhance student achievement, and reduce the size of targeted classes, shall the Palo Alto Unified School District be authorized to: levy an annual tax of $293 per parcel for 5 years, exempting upon application parcels owned by and principal residences of persons 65 years or older; and also, raise the District's annual appropriations limit in an amount equal to the tax for that year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10457, "no_votes": 3361, "total_votes": 13818, "percent_yes": 75.67665364017948, "percent_no": 24.32334635982052, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.304263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.924425", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To attract and retain qualified and experienced teachers and school employees, maintain educational programs that enhance student achievement, and reduce the size of targeted classes, shall the Palo Alto Unified School District be authorized to: levy an annual tax of $293 per parcel for 5 years, exempting upon application parcels owned by and principal residences of persons 65 years or older; and also, raise the District's annual appropriations limit in an amount equal to the tax for that year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12039, "fingerprint": "2001|200100217|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100217|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "28a9e3814f5650cb", "measure_id": "200100217", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to prevent overcrowding resulting from increasing enrollment, shall the Orchard School District, with annual audits and citizens oversight, purchase land and construct and furnish additional classrooms and school facilities by issuing $40 million of bonds within legal interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 391, "no_votes": 162, "total_votes": 553, "percent_yes": 70.70524412296564, "percent_no": 29.294755877034362, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.144729", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.305686", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.925355", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to prevent overcrowding resulting from increasing enrollment, shall the Orchard School District, with annual audits and citizens oversight, purchase land and construct and furnish additional classrooms and school facilities by issuing $40 million of bonds within legal interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9718, "fingerprint": "2001|200100084|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100084|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b646ade1edb170cd", "measure_id": "200100084", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain the quality of education, shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District be authorized to implement a special tax of $150 per parcel for each year beginning July 1, 2001 and continuing for nine years thereafter, increasing annually at a rate of 3.5% compounded? The revenue generated will be used to offset ongoing expenses needed to attract and retain qualfied teachers and staff as well as provide for competitive salaries and to maintain current programs.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 201, "no_votes": 96, "total_votes": 297, "percent_yes": 67.67676767676768, "percent_no": 32.32323232323232, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.303729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.923979", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain the quality of education, shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District be authorized to implement a special tax of $150 per parcel for each year beginning July 1, 2001 and continuing for nine years thereafter, increasing annually at a rate of 3.5% compounded? The revenue generated will be used to offset ongoing expenses needed to attract and retain qualfied teachers and staff as well as provide for competitive salaries and to maintain current programs.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9723, "fingerprint": "2001|200100087|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100087|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "2dd8408997b15919", "measure_id": "200100087", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain the quality of education, shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District be authorized to implement a special tax $150 per parcel for each year beginning July 1, 2001 and continuing for nine years thereafter, increasing annually at a rate of 3.5% compounded? The revenue generated will be used to offset ongoing expenses needed to attract and retain qualified teachers and staff as well as provide for competitive salaries and to maintain current programs.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 777, "no_votes": 540, "total_votes": 1317, "percent_yes": 58.997722095671975, "percent_no": 41.002277904328025, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.306536", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.925910", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain the quality of education, shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District be authorized to implement a special tax $150 per parcel for each year beginning July 1, 2001 and continuing for nine years thereafter, increasing annually at a rate of 3.5% compounded? The revenue generated will be used to offset ongoing expenses needed to attract and retain qualified teachers and staff as well as provide for competitive salaries and to maintain current programs.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9721, "fingerprint": "2001|200100062|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100062|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "38679780280ea6d7", "measure_id": "200100062", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the common boundary line between the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District and the Scotts Valley Unified School District be reorganized in such a manner that parcels 073-141-13[2044 Lockhart Gulch Road], 073-151-07[2220 Lockhart Gulch Road], 073-171-05[2036 Lockhart Gulch Road], 073-171-08[2028 Lockhart Gulch Road], 073-181-04[3835 Lockhart Gulch Road],  073-181-37[uninhabited], 073-181-39 [2030 Lockhart Gulch Road] shall no longer be a part of the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District and shall become a part of the Scotts Valley Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 8, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.305962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.925543", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the common boundary line between the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District and the Scotts Valley Unified School District be reorganized in such a manner that parcels 073-141-13[2044 Lockhart Gulch Road], 073-151-07[2220 Lockhart Gulch Road], 073-171-05[2036 Lockhart Gulch Road], 073-171-08[2028 Lockhart Gulch Road], 073-181-04[3835 Lockhart Gulch Road],  073-181-37[uninhabited], 073-181-39 [2030 Lockhart Gulch Road] shall no longer be a part of the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District and shall become a part of the Scotts Valley Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9722, "fingerprint": "2001|200100063|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100063|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "b2233d40888194d4", "measure_id": "200100063", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the common boundary line between the Scotts Valley Unified School District and the Loma Prieta Elementary and Los Gatos-Saratoga High School Districts be reorganized in such a manner that the parcels listed below shall no longer be a part of the Scotts Valley Unified School District which is under the jurisdiction of the Santa Cruz County Superintendent of Schools and shall become a part of the Loma Prieta Elementary and Los Gatos-Saratoga High School Districts which are under the jurisdiction of the Santa Clara County Superintendent of Schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 11, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.306267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.925726", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the common boundary line between the Scotts Valley Unified School District and the Loma Prieta Elementary and Los Gatos-Saratoga High School Districts be reorganized in such a manner that the parcels listed below shall no longer be a part of the Scotts Valley Unified School District which is under the jurisdiction of the Santa Cruz County Superintendent of Schools and shall become a part of the Loma Prieta Elementary and Los Gatos-Saratoga High School Districts which are under the jurisdiction of the Santa Clara County Superintendent of Schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9724, "fingerprint": "2001|200100044|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100044|SHASTA", "content_hash": "61c1797b76406682", "measure_id": "200100044", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Leonard Suter be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 102, "no_votes": 61, "total_votes": 163, "percent_yes": 62.57668711656442, "percent_no": 37.42331288343558, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.306866", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.926092", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Leonard Suter be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9725, "fingerprint": "2001|200100045|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100045|SHASTA", "content_hash": "737ba9027b31c373", "measure_id": "200100045", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Gary D. Vaught be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 99, "no_votes": 61, "total_votes": 160, "percent_yes": 61.875, "percent_no": 38.125, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.307163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.926272", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Gary D. Vaught be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9726, "fingerprint": "2001|200100046|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100046|SHASTA", "content_hash": "565c29e9b5adbb46", "measure_id": "200100046", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Gordon Walker be recalled(removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107, "no_votes": 54, "total_votes": 161, "percent_yes": 66.45962732919256, "percent_no": 33.54037267080744, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.307426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.926452", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Gordon Walker be recalled(removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9728, "fingerprint": "2001|200100219|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100219|SHASTA", "content_hash": "35bf52c11dd731b2", "measure_id": "200100219", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center and establish a four-year college program, expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs and construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities, install energy upgrades, upgrade science labs and construct and renovate classrooms and college facilities by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34 million of bonds at legal interest rates with citizens oversight and financial accountability?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14583, "no_votes": 10324, "total_votes": 24907, "percent_yes": 58.54980527562533, "percent_no": 41.45019472437467, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.307960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.926826", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center and establish a four-year college program, expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs and construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities, install energy upgrades, upgrade science labs and construct and renovate classrooms and college facilities by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34 million of bonds at legal interest rates with citizens oversight and financial accountability?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9727, "fingerprint": "2001|200100218|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100218|SHASTA", "content_hash": "2ce5c8ba8d84fa75", "measure_id": "200100218", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Because most of the schools in the Shasta Union High School District are old and must be renovated to serve both school and community needs, and because enrollment increases have filled local high schools beyond capacity, shall the Shasta Union High School District issue $31,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to improve school buildings, add new classrooms, and complete other projects specified in the District's Bond Project List, subject to specified accountability measures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8590, "no_votes": 6359, "total_votes": 14949, "percent_yes": 57.46203759448792, "percent_no": 42.53796240551208, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.307692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.926632", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Because most of the schools in the Shasta Union High School District are old and must be renovated to serve both school and community needs, and because enrollment increases have filled local high schools beyond capacity, shall the Shasta Union High School District issue $31,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to improve school buildings, add new classrooms, and complete other projects specified in the District's Bond Project List, subject to specified accountability measures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9729, "fingerprint": "2001|200100097|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100097|SIERRA", "content_hash": "2f3c4626fa4f5686", "measure_id": "200100097", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Anne Eldred be Recalled from office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 693, "no_votes": 685, "total_votes": 1378, "percent_yes": 50.29027576197388, "percent_no": 49.70972423802612, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-08-28", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.308226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.927009", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Anne Eldred be Recalled from office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9730, "fingerprint": "2001|200100174|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100174|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "ddd72f1c8670cfb9", "measure_id": "200100174", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Joan Van Matre be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84, "no_votes": 64, "total_votes": 148, "percent_yes": 56.75675675675676, "percent_no": 43.24324324324324, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.308489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.927192", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Joan Van Matre be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9731, "fingerprint": "2001|200100175|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100175|SOLANO", "content_hash": "a6d13bbf3ff47801", "measure_id": "200100175", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 2.04.020 of the Benicia Municipal Code be amended to require the City Council to fill a City Council vacancy created when a Council Member is elected to be Mayor by appointment of the person receiving the highest number of votes for a City Council seat, but not elected, at the same election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3451, "no_votes": 1676, "total_votes": 5127, "percent_yes": 67.31031792471231, "percent_no": 32.68968207528769, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.308784", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.927373", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 2.04.020 of the Benicia Municipal Code be amended to require the City Council to fill a City Council vacancy created when a Council Member is elected to be Mayor by appointment of the person receiving the highest number of votes for a City Council seat, but not elected, at the same election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9732, "fingerprint": "2001|200100176|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100176|SOLANO", "content_hash": "3d84876b9a7daca4", "measure_id": "200100176", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special tax be approved on owners of real property to pay for police and fire protection services and be deposited in a special account that is allocated specifically for such police and fire protection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1100, "no_votes": 1235, "total_votes": 2335, "percent_yes": 47.10920770877944, "percent_no": 52.89079229122056, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.309130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.927558", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax be approved on owners of real property to pay for police and fire protection services and be deposited in a special account that is allocated specifically for such police and fire protection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9733, "fingerprint": "2001|200100220|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100220|SOLANO", "content_hash": "0dcf6ead480999a2", "measure_id": "200100220", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide adequate classrooms, make essential health, safety and building repairs at aging school facilities, relieve severe overcrowding by acquiring, constructing or renovating local school sites, and qualify for state construction and renovation funding, shall the Vacaville Unified School District be authorized to issue $101,300,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and conduct annual audits to ensure funds are only spent on school construction efforts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8606, "no_votes": 4131, "total_votes": 12737, "percent_yes": 67.56693098845882, "percent_no": 32.43306901154118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.309463", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.927741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate classrooms, make essential health, safety and building repairs at aging school facilities, relieve severe overcrowding by acquiring, constructing or renovating local school sites, and qualify for state construction and renovation funding, shall the Vacaville Unified School District be authorized to issue $101,300,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, establish a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and conduct annual audits to ensure funds are only spent on school construction efforts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9734, "fingerprint": "2001|200100047|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100047|SONOMA", "content_hash": "11a342d481d70816", "measure_id": "200100047", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Gravenstein Union School District provide funds for the purpose of supporting computer education programs, library services, music programs and other education programs necessary to provide the District's children with a quality education by levying a special tax assessment on each assessor's parcel of $36.00 per year for a period of eight years, beginning July 1, 2001, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 742, "no_votes": 352, "total_votes": 1094, "percent_yes": 67.82449725776965, "percent_no": 32.17550274223035, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.309749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.927923", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Gravenstein Union School District provide funds for the purpose of supporting computer education programs, library services, music programs and other education programs necessary to provide the District's children with a quality education by levying a special tax assessment on each assessor's parcel of $36.00 per year for a period of eight years, beginning July 1, 2001, with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9735, "fingerprint": "2001|200100048|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100048|SONOMA", "content_hash": "9504f92d9ddff4b0", "measure_id": "200100048", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Kenwood School District, serving the children of Kenwood, provide funds for the preservation of small class size and the enhancement of academic and educational programs by continuing a special tax assessment for five years beginning July 1, 2002 in the amount of $48.00 per year for each assessor's parcel, with a 5% increase per year beginning July 1, 2003 with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the full measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 997, "no_votes": 274, "total_votes": 1271, "percent_yes": 78.44217151848937, "percent_no": 21.557828481510626, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.310051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.928104", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Kenwood School District, serving the children of Kenwood, provide funds for the preservation of small class size and the enhancement of academic and educational programs by continuing a special tax assessment for five years beginning July 1, 2002 in the amount of $48.00 per year for each assessor's parcel, with a 5% increase per year beginning July 1, 2003 with certain specific exemptions as set forth in the full measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9736, "fingerprint": "2001|200100088|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100088|SONOMA", "content_hash": "77ed2b4562ebe809", "measure_id": "200100088", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide financing to complete the rebuilding of Brook Haven Middle School to meet new earthquake safety standards, including new permanent classrooms, and to complete the Pine Crest Elementary School library and technology center, and for appropriate improvements to buildings and grounds and/or acquisition of real property, shall the Sebastopol Union School District be authorized to issue $3,200,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2642, "no_votes": 756, "total_votes": 3398, "percent_yes": 77.75161859917598, "percent_no": 22.248381400824016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.310320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.928286", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide financing to complete the rebuilding of Brook Haven Middle School to meet new earthquake safety standards, including new permanent classrooms, and to complete the Pine Crest Elementary School library and technology center, and for appropriate improvements to buildings and grounds and/or acquisition of real property, shall the Sebastopol Union School District be authorized to issue $3,200,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9738, "fingerprint": "2001|200100221|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100221|SONOMA", "content_hash": "7eef908d2ae28a24", "measure_id": "200100221", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funding needed for improvements to school buildings and grounds, including replacement of agin portables with new permanent classrooms, expansion of school library facilities, renovation of existing classrooms and renovation and/or construction of new facilities, and student and campus safety improvements; to qualify for and State matching grants; and for acquisition of interests in land; shall the Forestville Union School District be authorized to issue up to $5,100,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1041, "no_votes": 423, "total_votes": 1464, "percent_yes": 71.10655737704919, "percent_no": 28.893442622950815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.310923", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.928656", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding needed for improvements to school buildings and grounds, including replacement of agin portables with new permanent classrooms, expansion of school library facilities, renovation of existing classrooms and renovation and/or construction of new facilities, and student and campus safety improvements; to qualify for and State matching grants; and for acquisition of interests in land; shall the Forestville Union School District be authorized to issue up to $5,100,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9737, "fingerprint": "2001|200100124|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100124|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e53189ccc382695f", "measure_id": "200100124", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In 1997 the voters approved an increase in the District spending limit (Ordinance No.5-R) which allowed special tax funds to be spent on fire and emergency medical services; should this spending limit be renewed for another four years to allow the District to continue to spend the approved special tax funds for your local fire and emergency medical services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 642, "no_votes": 41, "total_votes": 683, "percent_yes": 93.99707174231332, "percent_no": 6.002928257686676, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.310619", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.928473", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In 1997 the voters approved an increase in the District spending limit (Ordinance No.5-R) which allowed special tax funds to be spent on fire and emergency medical services; should this spending limit be renewed for another four years to allow the District to continue to spend the approved special tax funds for your local fire and emergency medical services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9739, "fingerprint": "2001|200100057|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100057|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "3d1f4e3b241c9386", "measure_id": "200100057", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds for the construction of a middle school, relieve overcrowding at existing school facilities and allow existing high school facilities to be utilized, shall the Patterson Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $19,500,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities and grounds, and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1341, "no_votes": 530, "total_votes": 1871, "percent_yes": 71.67290219134152, "percent_no": 28.32709780865848, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-05-22", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.311195", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.928841", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds for the construction of a middle school, relieve overcrowding at existing school facilities and allow existing high school facilities to be utilized, shall the Patterson Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $19,500,000 in bonds at interest rates below legal limits to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities and grounds, and establish a Citizens Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9740, "fingerprint": "2001|200100090|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100090|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "902791f733f62acc", "measure_id": "200100090", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Without increasing the existing voter-approved special tax for school facilities, shall the Board of Trustees of the Empire Union School District be authorized, through its Community Facilities District No. 1987-1, to (1) amend the list of school facilities authorized to be constructed and improved; (2) increase the authorized maximum amount of bonded indebtedness by $15,000,000; (3) permit bonds to mature through fiscal year 2031-2032; and (4) increase the appropriations limit of Community Facilities District No. 1987-1 to $5,500,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2560, "no_votes": 816, "total_votes": 3376, "percent_yes": 75.82938388625593, "percent_no": 24.170616113744074, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-07-17", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.311498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.929022", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing the existing voter-approved special tax for school facilities, shall the Board of Trustees of the Empire Union School District be authorized, through its Community Facilities District No. 1987-1, to (1) amend the list of school facilities authorized to be constructed and improved; (2) increase the authorized maximum amount of bonded indebtedness by $15,000,000; (3) permit bonds to mature through fiscal year 2031-2032; and (4) increase the appropriations limit of Community Facilities District No. 1987-1 to $5,500,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9748, "fingerprint": "2001|200100222|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100222|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a1be37d4fcc1de98", "measure_id": "200100222", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Ceres Unified School District build and furnish a second high school in Ceres to reduce classroom overcrowding at Ceres High School and become eligible for State funding by issuing $25 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, appointing a citizens oversight committee, performing annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for teacher or administration salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3214, "no_votes": 1096, "total_votes": 4310, "percent_yes": 74.5707656612529, "percent_no": 25.429234338747094, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.313693", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.930483", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ceres Unified School District build and furnish a second high school in Ceres to reduce classroom overcrowding at Ceres High School and become eligible for State funding by issuing $25 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, appointing a citizens oversight committee, performing annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for teacher or administration salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9741, "fingerprint": "2001|200100177|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100177|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200100177", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10595, "no_votes": 14938, "total_votes": 25533, "percent_yes": 41.49531978224259, "percent_no": 58.50468021775741, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.311771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.929209", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9742, "fingerprint": "2001|200100178|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100178|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "200100178", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8423, "no_votes": 16589, "total_votes": 25012, "percent_yes": 33.67583559891252, "percent_no": 66.32416440108747, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.312039", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.929393", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9743, "fingerprint": "2001|200100179|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100179|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "682abb709ee734fb", "measure_id": "200100179", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to change the general municipal election date from November in odd-numbered years to March in even-numbered years and impose prospectively a two-term limit on the offices of Mayor and Councilmember?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10450, "no_votes": 16001, "total_votes": 26451, "percent_yes": 39.507012967373626, "percent_no": 60.492987032626374, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.312303", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.929577", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to change the general municipal election date from November in odd-numbered years to March in even-numbered years and impose prospectively a two-term limit on the offices of Mayor and Councilmember?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9744, "fingerprint": "2001|200100180|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100180|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "c15d0c784c8ef7ca", "measure_id": "200100180", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to change the general municipal election date from November in odd numbered years to March in even numbered years and to impose a requirement that beginning in the 2004 general municipal election, all Councilmembers other than the Mayor be elected from one of six districts, the boundaries of which would be determined by the Modesto City Clerk no later than July 1, 2002?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13767, "no_votes": 11389, "total_votes": 25156, "percent_yes": 54.72650659882334, "percent_no": 45.27349340117666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.312597", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.929759", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to change the general municipal election date from November in odd numbered years to March in even numbered years and to impose a requirement that beginning in the 2004 general municipal election, all Councilmembers other than the Mayor be elected from one of six districts, the boundaries of which would be determined by the Modesto City Clerk no later than July 1, 2002?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9745, "fingerprint": "2001|200100181|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100181|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "cdb3a3d573f0b3f2", "measure_id": "200100181", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For the purpose of dental health, shall the City of Modesto fluoridate its drinking water in accordance with the standards set by the State of California, and raise water rates by up to two percent (2%) to support the operation and maintenance costs of fluoridation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13572, "no_votes": 11311, "total_votes": 24883, "percent_yes": 54.54326246835189, "percent_no": 45.45673753164811, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.312894", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.929940", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the purpose of dental health, shall the City of Modesto fluoridate its drinking water in accordance with the standards set by the State of California, and raise water rates by up to two percent (2%) to support the operation and maintenance costs of fluoridation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9749, "fingerprint": "2001|200100223|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100223|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "d156176a2450bc6d", "measure_id": "200100223", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Denair Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and modernize school facilities, replace plumbing and sewers, upgrade electrical systems to accommodate computer technology, construct a gymnasium, build and renovate the library and science and business classrooms, make health and safety improvements, and make the District eligible for $3,500,000 in state-matching funds, by issuing $8,200,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 959, "no_votes": 222, "total_votes": 1181, "percent_yes": 81.20237087214225, "percent_no": 18.797629127857746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.313962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.930665", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education, shall the Denair Unified School District be authorized to acquire, construct, and modernize school facilities, replace plumbing and sewers, upgrade electrical systems to accommodate computer technology, construct a gymnasium, build and renovate the library and science and business classrooms, make health and safety improvements, and make the District eligible for $3,500,000 in state-matching funds, by issuing $8,200,000 of bonds subject to accountability measures and at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9746, "fingerprint": "2001|200100182|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100182|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "70d5c31cc51cb52a", "measure_id": "200100182", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(Advisory) Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan which is described in the Sample Ballot as set forth in Measure N, provided the area is first annexed to the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 307, "no_votes": 291, "total_votes": 598, "percent_yes": 51.33779264214047, "percent_no": 48.66220735785953, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.313160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.930120", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Advisory) Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan which is described in the Sample Ballot as set forth in Measure N, provided the area is first annexed to the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9747, "fingerprint": "2001|200100183|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100183|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "94b9501a41b0188a", "measure_id": "200100183", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(Advisory) Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the two (2) areas of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan which are described in the Sample Ballot as set forth in Measure O?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 291, "no_votes": 309, "total_votes": 600, "percent_yes": 48.5, "percent_no": 51.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.313426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.930303", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(Advisory) Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the two (2) areas of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan which are described in the Sample Ballot as set forth in Measure O?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9750, "fingerprint": "2001|200100224|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100224|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "3861785f8a43cb9c", "measure_id": "200100224", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair older school classrooms and buildings, construct, acquire, and furnish school facilities, add classrooms, science and computer labs, libraries, cafeterias, upgrade electrical wiring for technology and heating and cooling systems, and repair deteriorating restrooms, shall the Modesto City Elementary School District issue $17 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9167, "no_votes": 3943, "total_votes": 13110, "percent_yes": 69.92372234935164, "percent_no": 30.076277650648365, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.314268", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.930847", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair older school classrooms and buildings, construct, acquire, and furnish school facilities, add classrooms, science and computer labs, libraries, cafeterias, upgrade electrical wiring for technology and heating and cooling systems, and repair deteriorating restrooms, shall the Modesto City Elementary School District issue $17 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9751, "fingerprint": "2001|200100225|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100225|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "4c8f547f21b26ef0", "measure_id": "200100225", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair older school classrooms and buildings, construct, acquire, and furnish school facilities, acquire sites, add classrooms, science and computer labs, libraries, upgrade heating and cooling systems and electrical wiring for technology, repair roofs and deteriorating restrooms, shall the Modesto City High School District issue $65 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20783, "no_votes": 9856, "total_votes": 30639, "percent_yes": 67.83184829792094, "percent_no": 32.16815170207906, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.314569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.931029", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair older school classrooms and buildings, construct, acquire, and furnish school facilities, acquire sites, add classrooms, science and computer labs, libraries, upgrade heating and cooling systems and electrical wiring for technology, repair roofs and deteriorating restrooms, shall the Modesto City High School District issue $65 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a citizens oversight committee, and perform annual financial and performance audits, with no proceeds used for teacher or administrator salaries or other school operating expenses?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9753, "fingerprint": "2001|200100227|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100227|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "35bf52c11dd731b2", "measure_id": "200100227", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center and establish a four-year college program, expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs and construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities, install energy upgrades, upgrade science labs and construct and renovate classrooms and college facilities by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34 million of bonds at legal interest rates with citizens oversight and financial accountability?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4248, "no_votes": 3084, "total_votes": 7332, "percent_yes": 57.93780687397708, "percent_no": 42.06219312602292, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.315302", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.931398", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center and establish a four-year college program, expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs and construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities, install energy upgrades, upgrade science labs and construct and renovate classrooms and college facilities by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34 million of bonds at legal interest rates with citizens oversight and financial accountability?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9752, "fingerprint": "2001|200100226|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100226|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "0f6badfdceeefe01", "measure_id": "200100226", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Los Molinos Unified School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 293, "no_votes": 303, "total_votes": 596, "percent_yes": 49.16107382550335, "percent_no": 50.83892617449665, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.314962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.931214", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Los Molinos Unified School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9754, "fingerprint": "2001|200100228|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100228|TRINITY", "content_hash": "aa70bbbdbfe081d3", "measure_id": "200100228", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center and establish a four-year college program, expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs and construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities, install energy upgrade science labs and construct and renovate classrooms and college facilities by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34 milliion of bonds at legal interest rates with citizens oversight and financial accountablilty?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1833, "no_votes": 1158, "total_votes": 2991, "percent_yes": 61.28385155466399, "percent_no": 38.71614844533601, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.315598", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.931587", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Shasta College construct a university center and establish a four-year college program, expand its nursing, dental hygiene, and health services programs and construct a health science center, new science and technology facilities, install energy upgrade science labs and construct and renovate classrooms and college facilities by Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District issuing $34 milliion of bonds at legal interest rates with citizens oversight and financial accountablilty?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9757, "fingerprint": "2001|200100229|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100229|TULARE", "content_hash": "c834feb2ee9b58ab", "measure_id": "200100229", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Hipolito Cervantes be recalled (removed) from office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66, "no_votes": 102, "total_votes": 168, "percent_yes": 39.28571428571428, "percent_no": 60.71428571428572, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.316569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.932320", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Hipolito Cervantes be recalled (removed) from office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9758, "fingerprint": "2001|200100230|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100230|TULARE", "content_hash": "163fbee474e1b174", "measure_id": "200100230", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Magdalena Ortega be recalled (removed) from office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72, "no_votes": 96, "total_votes": 168, "percent_yes": 42.85714285714285, "percent_no": 57.14285714285715, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.316859", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.932512", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Magdalena Ortega be recalled (removed) from office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9759, "fingerprint": "2001|200100231|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100231|TULARE", "content_hash": "a363968e09d3ac52", "measure_id": "200100231", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Joey Velasquez be recalled (removed) from office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 77, "no_votes": 88, "total_votes": 165, "percent_yes": 46.66666666666666, "percent_no": 53.33333333333334, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.317141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.932708", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Joey Velasquez be recalled (removed) from office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9756, "fingerprint": "2001|200100100|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100100|TULARE", "content_hash": "b3808887823d690b", "measure_id": "200100100", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Strathmore Union High School District repair and upgrade the classrooms and facilities at Frazier Continuation High School and Strathmore High School, add two permanent classrooms and new additional student restrooms to Strathmore High School, build a swimming pool for use by the school and community, and for such purposes shall the district issue $3.5 million of bonds at the lowest rate possible?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 288, "no_votes": 161, "total_votes": 449, "percent_yes": 64.14253897550111, "percent_no": 35.85746102449889, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-09-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.316266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.932126", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Strathmore Union High School District repair and upgrade the classrooms and facilities at Frazier Continuation High School and Strathmore High School, add two permanent classrooms and new additional student restrooms to Strathmore High School, build a swimming pool for use by the school and community, and for such purposes shall the district issue $3.5 million of bonds at the lowest rate possible?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9755, "fingerprint": "2001|200100049|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100049|TULARE", "content_hash": "5841dddb04f9d01d", "measure_id": "200100049", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade existing schools, provide science and computer labs, library and student service centers, 10 classrooms and additional restrooms to meet needs, to provide improved access to modern computer technology at Exeter High, and to add permanent restrooms and improve and make safe seating at the athletic stadium, shall the Exeter Union High School District issue $4.25 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit with all money being spent for facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1268, "no_votes": 568, "total_votes": 1836, "percent_yes": 69.06318082788671, "percent_no": 30.93681917211329, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-03-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.315937", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.931899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade existing schools, provide science and computer labs, library and student service centers, 10 classrooms and additional restrooms to meet needs, to provide improved access to modern computer technology at Exeter High, and to add permanent restrooms and improve and make safe seating at the athletic stadium, shall the Exeter Union High School District issue $4.25 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit with all money being spent for facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9760, "fingerprint": "2001|200100184|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100184|VENTURA", "content_hash": "5f81dc9247dbead0", "measure_id": "200100184", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall The City's Comprehensive Plan be amended toprovide that until the Year 2031, city voter approval will be required for any urban development within the 9108-acre portion of the city Hillside Area described in City Council Resolution No. 2001-77, other than development consisting of public water facilities, public parks, city government facilities and certain exempted minor development?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11258, "no_votes": 3300, "total_votes": 14558, "percent_yes": 77.33205110592114, "percent_no": 22.66794889407886, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.317426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.932902", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall The City's Comprehensive Plan be amended toprovide that until the Year 2031, city voter approval will be required for any urban development within the 9108-acre portion of the city Hillside Area described in City Council Resolution No. 2001-77, other than development consisting of public water facilities, public parks, city government facilities and certain exempted minor development?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9761, "fingerprint": "2001|200100071|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100071|YOLO", "content_hash": "752250ef1cf4651d", "measure_id": "200100071", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Davis Ordinance No. 2048 amending the Park Preservation Tax to fund maintenance of parks, street trees, greenbelts, bike paths, medians, public landscaping, urban wildlife and habitat, swimming pools and recreational facilities be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6296, "no_votes": 4278, "total_votes": 10574, "percent_yes": 59.542273501040285, "percent_no": 40.457726498959715, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-06-05", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.317750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.933095", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Davis Ordinance No. 2048 amending the Park Preservation Tax to fund maintenance of parks, street trees, greenbelts, bike paths, medians, public landscaping, urban wildlife and habitat, swimming pools and recreational facilities be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9762, "fingerprint": "2001|200100185|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2001|200100185|YOLO", "content_hash": "e72cb57cd9d4482f", "measure_id": "200100185", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2001, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 16B, relating to Manufactured Home Space Rent Control, be added to the Code of the City of Woodland?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4485, "no_votes": 1049, "total_votes": 5534, "percent_yes": 81.04445247560534, "percent_no": 18.95554752439466, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2001-11-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 21, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.318070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.933285", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 16B, relating to Manufactured Home Space Rent Control, be added to the Code of the City of Woodland?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12040, "fingerprint": "2000|200000229|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000229|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "110e0e6b0ded0714", "measure_id": "200000229", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved to extend until 6/30/2009 the existing 5.5% Utility Users Tax, collected only in the unincorporated areas (e.g. Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview, San Lorenzo, Sunol), which funds County services, including services to unincorporated areas (e.g. Sheriff, Library, Planning and Code enforcement), and to amend the tax to include additional telecommunications services?  The tax DOES NOT APPLY in Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, Dublin, Emeryville, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, Newark, Oakland, Piedmont, Pleasanton, San Leandro, or Union City.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 284356, "no_votes": 105996, "total_votes": 390352, "percent_yes": 72.84604664507931, "percent_no": 27.153953354920688, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.156767", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.322064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.935588", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved to extend until 6/30/2009 the existing 5.5% Utility Users Tax, collected only in the unincorporated areas (e.g. Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview, San Lorenzo, Sunol), which funds County services, including services to unincorporated areas (e.g. Sheriff, Library, Planning and Code enforcement), and to amend the tax to include additional telecommunications services?  The tax DOES NOT APPLY in Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, Dublin, Emeryville, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, Newark, Oakland, Piedmont, Pleasanton, San Leandro, or Union City.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9773, "fingerprint": "2000|200000116|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000116|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fa9a7dad202bcd7a", "measure_id": "200000116", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding in Oakland's neighborhood schools and improve educational facilities for children, through projects such as constructing new schools; renovating classrooms and bathrooms; replacing electrical, plumbing, heating and ventilation systems; upgrading science labs and libraries; restoring arts/music rooms; and replacing deteriorating portable classrooms; shall Oakland Unified School District issue $303,000,000 in bonds at authorized interest rates for acquisition and improvement of land and facilities, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee funds are spent accordingly?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 69695, "no_votes": 12562, "total_votes": 82257, "percent_yes": 84.72835138650814, "percent_no": 15.271648613491863, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.321679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.935397", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding in Oakland's neighborhood schools and improve educational facilities for children, through projects such as constructing new schools; renovating classrooms and bathrooms; replacing electrical, plumbing, heating and ventilation systems; upgrading science labs and libraries; restoring arts/music rooms; and replacing deteriorating portable classrooms; shall Oakland Unified School District issue $303,000,000 in bonds at authorized interest rates for acquisition and improvement of land and facilities, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee funds are spent accordingly?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9789, "fingerprint": "2000|200000504|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000504|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a26de59300134b6d", "measure_id": "200000504", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, upgrade and add new classrooms to address overcrowding and facilitate reduced class sizes at Berkeley High School, King Middle School and other Berkeley schools, shall Berkeley Unified School District issue $116,500,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance acquisition or improvement of property for school safety and improved environment including building new classrooms; increasing seismic safety; replacing deteriorating floors, windows, restrooms, and roofs; upgrading school kitchens; modernizing science labs; and improving fire safety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38859, "no_votes": 7713, "total_votes": 46572, "percent_yes": 83.43854676629735, "percent_no": 16.56145323370265, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.329858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.940368", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, upgrade and add new classrooms to address overcrowding and facilitate reduced class sizes at Berkeley High School, King Middle School and other Berkeley schools, shall Berkeley Unified School District issue $116,500,000 in bonds, at interest rates within legal limits, to finance acquisition or improvement of property for school safety and improved environment including building new classrooms; increasing seismic safety; replacing deteriorating floors, windows, restrooms, and roofs; upgrading school kitchens; modernizing science labs; and improving fire safety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12041, "fingerprint": "2000|200000230|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000230|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "00b19b4b5981e567", "measure_id": "200000230", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Alameda County voters authorize implementing the Alameda County 20 year Transportation Expenditure Plan including: expand BART in Alameda County; expand Altamont Commuter Express service; expand Countywide Express, Local and Feeder Bus service, I-880/I-580/I-680/I-238/Route 84/Route 92 Improvements; extend special transit services for seniors and persons with disabilities; improve pedestrian/bike safety?  Approval of this Measure authorizes continuing the 1/2 cent transportation sales tax during the Plan's implementation.  A Citizens Watchdog Committee shall audit all expenditures.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 352504, "no_votes": 80153, "total_votes": 432657, "percent_yes": 81.47423940904689, "percent_no": 18.525760590953112, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.156966", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.322405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.935782", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Alameda County voters authorize implementing the Alameda County 20 year Transportation Expenditure Plan including: expand BART in Alameda County; expand Altamont Commuter Express service; expand Countywide Express, Local and Feeder Bus service, I-880/I-580/I-680/I-238/Route 84/Route 92 Improvements; extend special transit services for seniors and persons with disabilities; improve pedestrian/bike safety?  Approval of this Measure authorizes continuing the 1/2 cent transportation sales tax during the Plan's implementation.  A Citizens Watchdog Committee shall audit all expenditures.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9763, "fingerprint": "2000|200000003|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000003|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d7777bac301ac306", "measure_id": "200000003", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter of the County of Alameda be amended to provide that qualified persons with severe disabilities be exempted from civil service examination requirements for certain entry level positions in County service, with such persons acquiring regular civil service status after one year of satisfactory service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 159131, "no_votes": 124556, "total_votes": 283687, "percent_yes": 56.09386401209784, "percent_no": 43.90613598790216, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.318404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.933474", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the County of Alameda be amended to provide that qualified persons with severe disabilities be exempted from civil service examination requirements for certain entry level positions in County service, with such persons acquiring regular civil service status after one year of satisfactory service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9790, "fingerprint": "2000|200000505|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000505|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b39fb5c5573bd670", "measure_id": "200000505", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safety and essential maintenance of school buildings and grounds, shall the Berkeley Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of 4.5 cents/square foot on residential buildings and 6.75 cents/square foot on commercial buildings, for a period of 12 years?  Revenues will be used for maintaining school buildings and classrooms, roofs, boilers, restrooms, lighting, electrical systems, playgrounds and addressing fire and health safety hazards.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36338, "no_votes": 10009, "total_votes": 46347, "percent_yes": 78.40421170733812, "percent_no": 21.59578829266188, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.330232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.940565", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safety and essential maintenance of school buildings and grounds, shall the Berkeley Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of 4.5 cents/square foot on residential buildings and 6.75 cents/square foot on commercial buildings, for a period of 12 years?  Revenues will be used for maintaining school buildings and classrooms, roofs, boilers, restrooms, lighting, electrical systems, playgrounds and addressing fire and health safety hazards.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12042, "fingerprint": "2000|200000231|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000231|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "4001af1754f71787", "measure_id": "200000231", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a measure that, among other things, affirms the County's urban growth boundary and separates rural lands from lands suitable for urban uses, establishes an advisory commission to develop a plan to enhance agriculture and open space, affirms County open space funding policies, continues cooperative planning efforts, requires a county-wide vote to change these policies except for certain city-adopted urban growth boundary changes, and provides an alternative to Measure D be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 179858, "no_votes": 237223, "total_votes": 417081, "percent_yes": 43.12303845056476, "percent_no": 56.87696154943524, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.157168", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.322735", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.935976", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure that, among other things, affirms the County's urban growth boundary and separates rural lands from lands suitable for urban uses, establishes an advisory commission to develop a plan to enhance agriculture and open space, affirms County open space funding policies, continues cooperative planning efforts, requires a county-wide vote to change these policies except for certain city-adopted urban growth boundary changes, and provides an alternative to Measure D be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9764, "fingerprint": "2000|200000004|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000004|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "c9ca40cb4717d8cd", "measure_id": "200000004", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter of the County of Alameda be amended to eliminate the requirement that all Civil Service examinations shall have a mandatory recruitment period of 25 days or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 128808, "no_votes": 143033, "total_votes": 271841, "percent_yes": 47.38358084321349, "percent_no": 52.61641915678651, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.318937", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.933669", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the County of Alameda be amended to eliminate the requirement that all Civil Service examinations shall have a mandatory recruitment period of 25 days or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12043, "fingerprint": "2000|200000232|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000232|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5bf343e0989f43c0", "measure_id": "200000232", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the Alameda County General Plan to, among other things, revise the urban growth boundary in the East County to reserve less land for urban growth and more land for agriculture and open space, apply similar policies to rural Castro Valley, require new housing to be located primarily within existing cities, modify land use restrictions applicable to rural areas, and require a County-wide vote on changes to these policies, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 243094, "no_votes": 186682, "total_votes": 429776, "percent_yes": 56.562953724731024, "percent_no": 43.437046275268976, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.157373", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.323095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.936166", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the Alameda County General Plan to, among other things, revise the urban growth boundary in the East County to reserve less land for urban growth and more land for agriculture and open space, apply similar policies to rural Castro Valley, require new housing to be located primarily within existing cities, modify land use restrictions applicable to rural areas, and require a County-wide vote on changes to these policies, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9766, "fingerprint": "2000|200000034|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000034|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b719c4bdd871ada8", "measure_id": "200000034", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 404 (a) and (b) of the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to add to the Board of Education three District School Directors who shall be appointed by the Mayor during the period of May 1, 2000 to May 1, 2004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41209, "no_votes": 37816, "total_votes": 79025, "percent_yes": 52.14678899082569, "percent_no": 47.85321100917431, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.319544", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.934046", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 404 (a) and (b) of the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to add to the Board of Education three District School Directors who shall be appointed by the Mayor during the period of May 1, 2000 to May 1, 2004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12050, "fingerprint": "2000|200000506|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000506|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d656e8c0a17c300d", "measure_id": "200000506", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Peralta Community College District, which includes the College of Alameda in Alameda, Laney and Merritt Colleges in Oakland, and Vista College in Berkeley, issue $153.2 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to repair, renovate and construct classrooms, vocational training facilities, science labs and high-tech computer labs; meet current health, safety and accessability standards; replace inadequate electrical, ventilation, gas, water and sewer systems and construct and acquire other facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 153429, "no_votes": 40212, "total_votes": 193641, "percent_yes": 79.23373665700963, "percent_no": 20.76626334299037, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.162271", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.330521", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.940758", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Peralta Community College District, which includes the College of Alameda in Alameda, Laney and Merritt Colleges in Oakland, and Vista College in Berkeley, issue $153.2 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit to repair, renovate and construct classrooms, vocational training facilities, science labs and high-tech computer labs; meet current health, safety and accessability standards; replace inadequate electrical, ventilation, gas, water and sewer systems and construct and acquire other facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9767, "fingerprint": "2000|200000035|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000035|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "57bce7c414fc62d6", "measure_id": "200000035", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Shall voters endorse the Mayor's Education Commission's call for Oakland achieving statewide test averages for elementary schools by 2002, and middle and high schools by 2004, by establishing a system of diverse and excellent public schools that: provide safe, modern facilities; requires each school to adopt a successful reading program; allows each school to select and remove its teachers and staff; sanctions and rewards schools based on performance; and initiates City/County collaborations to support education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55578, "no_votes": 21165, "total_votes": 76743, "percent_yes": 72.42093741448731, "percent_no": 27.579062585512688, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.319839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.934238", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Shall voters endorse the Mayor's Education Commission's call for Oakland achieving statewide test averages for elementary schools by 2002, and middle and high schools by 2004, by establishing a system of diverse and excellent public schools that: provide safe, modern facilities; requires each school to adopt a successful reading program; allows each school to select and remove its teachers and staff; sanctions and rewards schools based on performance; and initiates City/County collaborations to support education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12048, "fingerprint": "2000|200000319|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000319|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "976c9cfad78f5e64", "measure_id": "200000319", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a City of San Leandro Charter Amendment be adopted to require run-off elections if candidates for elective office do not receive at least 50% plus one of the votes cast for that elective office and to require the City Council to adopt an ordinance establishing such run-off voting system?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14347, "no_votes": 8381, "total_votes": 22728, "percent_yes": 63.124780007039774, "percent_no": 36.875219992960226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.161443", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.329157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.939985", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a City of San Leandro Charter Amendment be adopted to require run-off elections if candidates for elective office do not receive at least 50% plus one of the votes cast for that elective office and to require the City Council to adopt an ordinance establishing such run-off voting system?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9768, "fingerprint": "2000|200000036|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000036|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7df156d59059ec74", "measure_id": "200000036", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 4.03 of the Piedmont City Charter be amended to increase the maximum amount of the \"General Fund Reserve\" to 25% as more fully set forth in Resolution 70-99 of the Piedmont City Council on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3109, "no_votes": 1173, "total_votes": 4282, "percent_yes": 72.60625875758991, "percent_no": 27.393741242410087, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.320168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.934435", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 4.03 of the Piedmont City Charter be amended to increase the maximum amount of the \"General Fund Reserve\" to 25% as more fully set forth in Resolution 70-99 of the Piedmont City Council on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12049, "fingerprint": "2000|200000320|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000320|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "25eb11fa4595359c", "measure_id": "200000320", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to repeal the existing City of San Leandro real property transfer tax, which is a tax required to be paid at the time real property in the City of San Leandro is sold or transferred, with some exceptions, and to prohibit imposition of a new real property transfer tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9020, "no_votes": 15118, "total_votes": 24138, "percent_yes": 37.368464661529536, "percent_no": 62.631535338470464, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.161667", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.329444", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.940178", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to repeal the existing City of San Leandro real property transfer tax, which is a tax required to be paid at the time real property in the City of San Leandro is sold or transferred, with some exceptions, and to prohibit imposition of a new real property transfer tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9769, "fingerprint": "2000|200000037|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000037|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fda6b31951141e86", "measure_id": "200000037", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 20B of the Piedmont City Code be amended in its entirety to provide for a 4-year Municipal Services Tax as more specifically set forth in Ord. 609 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2983, "no_votes": 1239, "total_votes": 4222, "percent_yes": 70.6537186167693, "percent_no": 29.346281383230703, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.320487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.934624", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 20B of the Piedmont City Code be amended in its entirety to provide for a 4-year Municipal Services Tax as more specifically set forth in Ord. 609 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12044, "fingerprint": "2000|200000314|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000314|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "dc09732b1e941c33", "measure_id": "200000314", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Oakland City Charter section 205 be amended to provide for special elections to fill City Council vacancies occurring before June 15 of the second year of the four year term and to otherwise provide for appointment by a majority vote of the remaining members of the Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45020, "no_votes": 58071, "total_votes": 103091, "percent_yes": 43.67015549369004, "percent_no": 56.32984450630996, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.160406", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.327641", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.939034", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Oakland City Charter section 205 be amended to provide for special elections to fill City Council vacancies occurring before June 15 of the second year of the four year term and to otherwise provide for appointment by a majority vote of the remaining members of the Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9770, "fingerprint": "2000|200000038|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000038|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "cabadbf73eec9b28", "measure_id": "200000038", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Chapter 20E be added to the Piedmont City Code providing for a new Special Municipal Sewer Taxx, replacing the existing sewer service charge, as more specifically set forth in Ord. 610 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3241, "no_votes": 1101, "total_votes": 4342, "percent_yes": 74.64302164900968, "percent_no": 25.356978350990317, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.320780", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.934815", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Chapter 20E be added to the Piedmont City Code providing for a new Special Municipal Sewer Taxx, replacing the existing sewer service charge, as more specifically set forth in Ord. 610 N.S. which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12045, "fingerprint": "2000|200000315|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000315|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "68a7bb0e9da14060", "measure_id": "200000315", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Oakland City Charter sections 205 and 206 be amended to provide for special elections to fill City Council vacancies and to further define vacancy?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72537, "no_votes": 27749, "total_votes": 100286, "percent_yes": 72.33013581157888, "percent_no": 27.669864188421116, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.160605", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.327935", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.939224", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Oakland City Charter sections 205 and 206 be amended to provide for special elections to fill City Council vacancies and to further define vacancy?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9771, "fingerprint": "2000|200000039|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000039|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "fff2a72d07498836", "measure_id": "200000039", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Pleasanton (1) purchase approximately 430 acres of the 500 acre San Francisco Bernal Avenue property for community facilities, open space and other public uses (\"public uses\") by (a) issuing General Obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $50,000,000; (b) approving residential development on 35 +/- acres and commercial/retail development on 37 +/- acres to the extent necessary to raise the balance of the purchase price; and (2) require voter approval of the City of Pleasanton's plan for future \"public uses\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12265, "no_votes": 6890, "total_votes": 19155, "percent_yes": 64.03027930044375, "percent_no": 35.96972069955625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.321069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.935008", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Pleasanton (1) purchase approximately 430 acres of the 500 acre San Francisco Bernal Avenue property for community facilities, open space and other public uses (\"public uses\") by (a) issuing General Obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $50,000,000; (b) approving residential development on 35 +/- acres and commercial/retail development on 37 +/- acres to the extent necessary to raise the balance of the purchase price; and (2) require voter approval of the City of Pleasanton's plan for future \"public uses\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12046, "fingerprint": "2000|200000316|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000316|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f542a8bf1ccb9303", "measure_id": "200000316", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland City Charter be amended to permit active members of the Police and Fire Retirement System (\"PFRS\") to terminate their PFRS membership and become members of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (\"PERS\") (hereinafter referred to as \"transfer to PERS\") if (1) the City Council authorizes the transfer to PERS; and (2) the PFRS Board authorizes transfer to PERS of PFRS funds that represent the active members' employee and employer contributions to PFRS?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 74996, "no_votes": 25647, "total_votes": 100643, "percent_yes": 74.51685661198493, "percent_no": 25.483143388015066, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.160809", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.328223", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.939413", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland City Charter be amended to permit active members of the Police and Fire Retirement System (\"PFRS\") to terminate their PFRS membership and become members of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (\"PERS\") (hereinafter referred to as \"transfer to PERS\") if (1) the City Council authorizes the transfer to PERS; and (2) the PFRS Board authorizes transfer to PERS of PFRS funds that represent the active members' employee and employer contributions to PFRS?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9772, "fingerprint": "2000|200000040|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000040|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "665bd3568576f724", "measure_id": "200000040", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Should wastewater from treated sewage that has been further treated with reverse osmosis (RO) technology be injected into the Valley's groundwater basin that serves as the potable (drinking) water supply for Pleasanton and the Livermore Amador Valley?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5206, "no_votes": 13611, "total_votes": 18817, "percent_yes": 27.66647180740819, "percent_no": 72.33352819259181, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.321355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.935206", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Should wastewater from treated sewage that has been further treated with reverse osmosis (RO) technology be injected into the Valley's groundwater basin that serves as the potable (drinking) water supply for Pleasanton and the Livermore Amador Valley?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12047, "fingerprint": "2000|200000317|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000317|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ddcbede2126a3dc3", "measure_id": "200000317", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland City Charter be amended to permit retired members of the Police and Fire Retirement System (\"PFRS\") to hold employment with the City pursuant to a City authorized Deferred Retirement Option Plan (\"DROP\")?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71283, "no_votes": 29865, "total_votes": 101148, "percent_yes": 70.47395895123977, "percent_no": 29.526041048760234, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.161009", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.328520", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.939604", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland City Charter be amended to permit retired members of the Police and Fire Retirement System (\"PFRS\") to hold employment with the City pursuant to a City authorized Deferred Retirement Option Plan (\"DROP\")?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9765, "fingerprint": "2000|200000033|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000033|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "071a3f3194855a94", "measure_id": "200000033", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the South Livermore Urban Growth Boundary Initiative be adopted to require voter approval of changes to the location of and policies governing the Urban Growth Boundary in the South Livermore area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15107, "no_votes": 3299, "total_votes": 18406, "percent_yes": 82.07649679452352, "percent_no": 17.92350320547648, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.319255", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.933858", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the South Livermore Urban Growth Boundary Initiative be adopted to require voter approval of changes to the location of and policies governing the Urban Growth Boundary in the South Livermore area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9788, "fingerprint": "2000|200000318|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000318|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a4166d592a0f1648", "measure_id": "200000318", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland City Charter be amended at Section 107, 207, 218, 405, 701, 809, 906, 1208 and 1213 to eliminate inconsistencies, clarify existing charter text, and harmonize previous charter sections with more recently enacted mayor-council provisions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68901, "no_votes": 29728, "total_votes": 98629, "percent_yes": 69.85876364963651, "percent_no": 30.141236350363485, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.328842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.939795", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland City Charter be amended at Section 107, 207, 218, 405, 701, 809, 906, 1208 and 1213 to eliminate inconsistencies, clarify existing charter text, and harmonize previous charter sections with more recently enacted mayor-council provisions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9787, "fingerprint": "2000|200000313|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000313|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "44f4f8be47271162", "measure_id": "200000313", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a Resolution be adopted to amend the City of Dublin General Plan to establish an Urban Limit Line in the Western Extended Planning Area for a period of 30 years, and to require that the Urban Limit Line may be changed only by a vote of the people of Dublin during the effective period?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5362, "no_votes": 3688, "total_votes": 9050, "percent_yes": 59.24861878453038, "percent_no": 40.75138121546962, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.327356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.938842", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Resolution be adopted to amend the City of Dublin General Plan to establish an Urban Limit Line in the Western Extended Planning Area for a period of 30 years, and to require that the Urban Limit Line may be changed only by a vote of the people of Dublin during the effective period?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9775, "fingerprint": "2000|200000301|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000301|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e7d21ae6e4d63f87", "measure_id": "200000301", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special tax of $18.00 per residential unit be authorized in the City of Albany to fund Paramedic Advanced Life Support (ALS) fire engines and future ambulance purchases as part of the City of Albany's Emergency Medical Services Program?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5292, "no_votes": 1482, "total_votes": 6774, "percent_yes": 78.12223206377325, "percent_no": 21.877767936226746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.323771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.936549", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax of $18.00 per residential unit be authorized in the City of Albany to fund Paramedic Advanced Life Support (ALS) fire engines and future ambulance purchases as part of the City of Albany's Emergency Medical Services Program?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9774, "fingerprint": "2000|200000300|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000300|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3f4e8b41dfa90550", "measure_id": "200000300", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to improve library facilties, shall the City of Alameda issue general obligation bonds not to exceed $10,600,000, subject to matching funds being obtained to fund at least 60% of the construction costs, to acquire, construct and/or improve the main library, the West End and Bay Farm branch libraries, including providing adequate space for children, improving disabled accessability, and providing access to technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20786, "no_votes": 5739, "total_votes": 26525, "percent_yes": 78.36380772855797, "percent_no": 21.636192271442027, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.323430", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.936356", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to improve library facilties, shall the City of Alameda issue general obligation bonds not to exceed $10,600,000, subject to matching funds being obtained to fund at least 60% of the construction costs, to acquire, construct and/or improve the main library, the West End and Bay Farm branch libraries, including providing adequate space for children, improving disabled accessability, and providing access to technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9776, "fingerprint": "2000|200000302|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000302|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e14b11b2d025d515", "measure_id": "200000302", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to qualify for State of California or other library imporvement matching funds and ensure public safety, shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds to renovate, expand and upgrade Branch Libraries in an amount not to exceed $5,200,000, at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit; provided that said bonds shall be issued only if state or other matching funds provide at least 65% of the cost of these improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37842, "no_votes": 7639, "total_votes": 45481, "percent_yes": 83.20397528638333, "percent_no": 16.796024713616674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.324070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.936741", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to qualify for State of California or other library imporvement matching funds and ensure public safety, shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds to renovate, expand and upgrade Branch Libraries in an amount not to exceed $5,200,000, at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit; provided that said bonds shall be issued only if state or other matching funds provide at least 65% of the cost of these improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9777, "fingerprint": "2000|200000303|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000303|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "4b3c39ec28d5dea7", "measure_id": "200000303", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to fund the mobile disaster fire protection system as described in City Council Resolution Nos. 60,914-N.S. and 60,915-N.S., shall Community Facilities District No. 1 (Disaster Fire Protection) of the City of Berkeley; incur a bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $9,750,000; levy a special tax at a rate not exceeding $0.00125 per square foot of building area; and establish an appropriations limit of $1,000,000 per fiscal year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28485, "no_votes": 13464, "total_votes": 41949, "percent_yes": 67.90388328684833, "percent_no": 32.09611671315167, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.324355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.936930", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to fund the mobile disaster fire protection system as described in City Council Resolution Nos. 60,914-N.S. and 60,915-N.S., shall Community Facilities District No. 1 (Disaster Fire Protection) of the City of Berkeley; incur a bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $9,750,000; levy a special tax at a rate not exceeding $0.00125 per square foot of building area; and establish an appropriations limit of $1,000,000 per fiscal year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9778, "fingerprint": "2000|200000304|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000304|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "485192b8a6d99ab2", "measure_id": "200000304", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To reconstruct, renovate, repair and improve the warm water pool facilities at Berkeley High School (including restrooms and locker space), in order to prepare the facilities for greater community use by seniors, disabled adults and disabled children, some of whom use the pool for physical therapy, shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,250,000, at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34361, "no_votes": 10866, "total_votes": 45227, "percent_yes": 75.97452848961903, "percent_no": 24.025471510380967, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.324639", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.937120", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reconstruct, renovate, repair and improve the warm water pool facilities at Berkeley High School (including restrooms and locker space), in order to prepare the facilities for greater community use by seniors, disabled adults and disabled children, some of whom use the pool for physical therapy, shall the City of Berkeley issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,250,000, at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9779, "fingerprint": "2000|200000305|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000305|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f2431371eaea8d6a", "measure_id": "200000305", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the special tax for the direct costs of park maintenance, city trees and landscaping in the City of Berkeley, which is currently 8.11 cents per square foot of improvements, be increased to 8.90 cents?  Financial Implications: The annual tax increase for an average 1,900 square foot home would be $15.01, resulting in a total tax of $169.01.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33628, "no_votes": 12050, "total_votes": 45678, "percent_yes": 73.61968562546521, "percent_no": 26.38031437453479, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.324955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.937310", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the special tax for the direct costs of park maintenance, city trees and landscaping in the City of Berkeley, which is currently 8.11 cents per square foot of improvements, be increased to 8.90 cents?  Financial Implications: The annual tax increase for an average 1,900 square foot home would be $15.01, resulting in a total tax of $169.01.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9780, "fingerprint": "2000|200000306|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000306|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "515ffb739a5de79b", "measure_id": "200000306", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special tax of 0.26 cents per square foot of improvements on residential land, 0.52 cents per square foot on industrial land and 1.04 cents per square foot on commercial land in Berkeley be authorized to provide supplemental funding for maintenance and installation of streetlights?  Financial Implications: The annual cost for an average 1,900 square foot home would be $4.94, and for a 10,000 square foot industrial property or 5000 square foot commercial property would be $52.00.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27636, "no_votes": 16283, "total_votes": 43919, "percent_yes": 62.92492998474465, "percent_no": 37.07507001525535, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.325272", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.937502", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax of 0.26 cents per square foot of improvements on residential land, 0.52 cents per square foot on industrial land and 1.04 cents per square foot on commercial land in Berkeley be authorized to provide supplemental funding for maintenance and installation of streetlights?  Financial Implications: The annual cost for an average 1,900 square foot home would be $4.94, and for a 10,000 square foot industrial property or 5000 square foot commercial property would be $52.00.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9781, "fingerprint": "2000|200000307|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000307|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "891923c3b54f32af", "measure_id": "200000307", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Business License Tax Ordinance be amended to correct an error made in 1991 by providing that the Business License Tax rate applicable for providers of health, veterinary, legal, educational, engineering-architectural-surveying, accounting-auditing-bookkeeping, and miscellaneous services not otherwise classified be increased to the pre-1990 rate of $3.60 for every $1,000 in gross receipts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32326, "no_votes": 9289, "total_votes": 41615, "percent_yes": 77.67872161480236, "percent_no": 22.321278385197644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.325560", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.937695", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Business License Tax Ordinance be amended to correct an error made in 1991 by providing that the Business License Tax rate applicable for providers of health, veterinary, legal, educational, engineering-architectural-surveying, accounting-auditing-bookkeeping, and miscellaneous services not otherwise classified be increased to the pre-1990 rate of $3.60 for every $1,000 in gross receipts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9782, "fingerprint": "2000|200000308|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000308|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a773fa452c3ee12e", "measure_id": "200000308", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Library Relief Act of 1980 (Ordinance No. 5262-N.S.) be amended to reauthorize the City, over a period of four years, to spend the Library Tax as approved by the voters in 1988?  Financial Implications: This is not a tax increase.  Fiscal Year 2000-01 expenditure authorized $9,797,016.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37650, "no_votes": 6179, "total_votes": 43829, "percent_yes": 85.90202833740219, "percent_no": 14.097971662597814, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.325849", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.937885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Library Relief Act of 1980 (Ordinance No. 5262-N.S.) be amended to reauthorize the City, over a period of four years, to spend the Library Tax as approved by the voters in 1988?  Financial Implications: This is not a tax increase.  Fiscal Year 2000-01 expenditure authorized $9,797,016.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9783, "fingerprint": "2000|200000309|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000309|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f50460188d234e49", "measure_id": "200000309", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Parks Maintenance Tax (Ordinance No. 6373-N.S.) be amended to reauthorize the City, over a period of four years, to spend the proceeds of the Parks Maintenance Taxx as approved by the voters in 1997?  Financial Implications: This is not a tax increase.  Fiscal Year 2001-02 expenditure authorized $6,250,000.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37635, "no_votes": 6191, "total_votes": 43826, "percent_yes": 85.87368228905216, "percent_no": 14.126317710947845, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.326170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.938074", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Parks Maintenance Tax (Ordinance No. 6373-N.S.) be amended to reauthorize the City, over a period of four years, to spend the proceeds of the Parks Maintenance Taxx as approved by the voters in 1997?  Financial Implications: This is not a tax increase.  Fiscal Year 2001-02 expenditure authorized $6,250,000.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9784, "fingerprint": "2000|200000310|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000310|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9175d6d06716d0d3", "measure_id": "200000310", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Emergency Medical Services Tax (Ordinance No. 6374-N.S.) be amended to reauthorize the City, over a period of four years, to spend the proceeds of the Emergency Medical Services Tax as approved by the voters in 1997?  Financial Implications: This is not a tax increase.  Fiscal Year 2001-02 expenditure authorized $1,805,522.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37402, "no_votes": 5594, "total_votes": 42996, "percent_yes": 86.9894873941762, "percent_no": 13.010512605823806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.326492", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.938267", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Emergency Medical Services Tax (Ordinance No. 6374-N.S.) be amended to reauthorize the City, over a period of four years, to spend the proceeds of the Emergency Medical Services Tax as approved by the voters in 1997?  Financial Implications: This is not a tax increase.  Fiscal Year 2001-02 expenditure authorized $1,805,522.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9785, "fingerprint": "2000|200000311|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000311|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "5c89d07c4084ebde", "measure_id": "200000311", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the rent ordinance be amended to restrict a landlord's ability to evict for landlord/relative occupancy by: prohibiting evictions where a landlord owns a comparable vacant unit; providing $4500 in relocation assistance to certain low-income tenants; prohibiting evictions of some elderly and disabled tenants; restricting the units which may be subjct to landlord/relative move-ins; providing for the evicted tenant's right of re-occupancy; and providing for a prevailing tenant's right to attorneys' fees in an eviction?  Financial Implications: None", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26355, "no_votes": 20020, "total_votes": 46375, "percent_yes": 56.83018867924529, "percent_no": 43.16981132075471, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.326782", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.938456", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the rent ordinance be amended to restrict a landlord's ability to evict for landlord/relative occupancy by: prohibiting evictions where a landlord owns a comparable vacant unit; providing $4500 in relocation assistance to certain low-income tenants; prohibiting evictions of some elderly and disabled tenants; restricting the units which may be subjct to landlord/relative move-ins; providing for the evicted tenant's right of re-occupancy; and providing for a prevailing tenant's right to attorneys' fees in an eviction?  Financial Implications: None", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9786, "fingerprint": "2000|200000312|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000312|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "db7889056f9ef93c", "measure_id": "200000312", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall any federal, state or local public entity be empowered to develop, construct or acquire an additional 500 units of low-rent housing in the City of Berkeley for persons of low income?  Financial Implications: Uncertain, dependent on means of financing used.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31385, "no_votes": 12590, "total_votes": 43975, "percent_yes": 71.37009664582149, "percent_no": 28.62990335417851, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.327069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.938647", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall any federal, state or local public entity be empowered to develop, construct or acquire an additional 500 units of low-rent housing in the City of Berkeley for persons of low income?  Financial Implications: Uncertain, dependent on means of financing used.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9794, "fingerprint": "2000|200000166|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000166|BUTTE", "content_hash": "94fbcf125151c802", "measure_id": "200000166", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall DENNIS DIVER be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 875, "no_votes": 662, "total_votes": 1537, "percent_yes": 56.92908262849707, "percent_no": 43.07091737150293, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.331983", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.941542", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall DENNIS DIVER be recalled (removed) from the office of Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9795, "fingerprint": "2000|200000167|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000167|BUTTE", "content_hash": "8ebd56798314a3cc", "measure_id": "200000167", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall PAT SANDS be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 835, "no_votes": 687, "total_votes": 1522, "percent_yes": 54.862023653088045, "percent_no": 45.137976346911955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.332310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.941740", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall PAT SANDS be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9796, "fingerprint": "2000|200000168|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000168|BUTTE", "content_hash": "1c4b18e4e9151817", "measure_id": "200000168", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall MICHAEL MORGAN be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 859, "no_votes": 658, "total_votes": 1517, "percent_yes": 56.62491760052736, "percent_no": 43.37508239947264, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.332576", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.941930", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall MICHAEL MORGAN be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9804, "fingerprint": "2000|200000325|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000325|BUTTE", "content_hash": "295d4ff599346383", "measure_id": "200000325", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance requiring voter approval prior to locating a prison or any facility to incarcerate or house prisoners in the City of Gridley be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1085, "no_votes": 270, "total_votes": 1355, "percent_yes": 80.07380073800738, "percent_no": 19.926199261992622, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.334957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.943465", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance requiring voter approval prior to locating a prison or any facility to incarcerate or house prisoners in the City of Gridley be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9800, "fingerprint": "2000|200000321|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000321|BUTTE", "content_hash": "016911c5c22f6c92", "measure_id": "200000321", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the People's Choice Prison Initiative Ordinance be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 390, "no_votes": 102, "total_votes": 492, "percent_yes": 79.26829268292683, "percent_no": 20.731707317073173, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.333888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.942704", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the People's Choice Prison Initiative Ordinance be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9807, "fingerprint": "2000|200000507|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000507|BUTTE", "content_hash": "940163e6936be373", "measure_id": "200000507", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Oroville Union High School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,610,000 for the purpose of the Las Plumas High School Expansion Project and modernization projects at Oroville High School including, replacement of outdated portable classrooms, tech lab conversion, general step and concrete work, general painting, and roofing within the Oroville Union High School District, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8787, "no_votes": 7171, "total_votes": 15958, "percent_yes": 55.06329113924051, "percent_no": 44.93670886075949, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.335832", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.944052", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oroville Union High School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,610,000 for the purpose of the Las Plumas High School Expansion Project and modernization projects at Oroville High School including, replacement of outdated portable classrooms, tech lab conversion, general step and concrete work, general painting, and roofing within the Oroville Union High School District, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9791, "fingerprint": "2000|200000005|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000005|BUTTE", "content_hash": "54f430a666295136", "measure_id": "200000005", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "DISSOLUTION OF DISTRICT.  Shall the order adopted on September 28, 1999, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte ordering the dissolution of the Lime Saddle Community Services District be confirmed, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 241, "no_votes": 156, "total_votes": 397, "percent_yes": 60.70528967254408, "percent_no": 39.29471032745592, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.331099", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.940955", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "DISSOLUTION OF DISTRICT.  Shall the order adopted on September 28, 1999, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte ordering the dissolution of the Lime Saddle Community Services District be confirmed, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9792, "fingerprint": "2000|200000041|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000041|BUTTE", "content_hash": "62f00f78164907d2", "measure_id": "200000041", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  Shall Article XXII, Section 1 of the Charter of the City of Oroville entitled \"VACANCIES\" be amended by the deletion of the provision, which states that if the Council fails to fill a vacant elective or appointive office within sixty (60) days, the Mayor shall appoint a person to such vacant office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1177, "no_votes": 1388, "total_votes": 2565, "percent_yes": 45.8869395711501, "percent_no": 54.1130604288499, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.331429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.941149", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  Shall Article XXII, Section 1 of the Charter of the City of Oroville entitled \"VACANCIES\" be amended by the deletion of the provision, which states that if the Council fails to fill a vacant elective or appointive office within sixty (60) days, the Mayor shall appoint a person to such vacant office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9793, "fingerprint": "2000|200000042|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000042|BUTTE", "content_hash": "7bdd12ca74acbc0b", "measure_id": "200000042", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  Shall Article VI, Section 1 of the Charter of the City of Oroville entitled \"OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES\" be amended by removing as officers of the City, a judge of the city court and a board of five library trustees, and providing that an increase or reduction, appointment or removal of any officer, assistant, deputy, clerk or employee by the Council requires a four-seventh's vote?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1138, "no_votes": 1402, "total_votes": 2540, "percent_yes": 44.80314960629921, "percent_no": 55.19685039370079, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.331710", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.941348", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  Shall Article VI, Section 1 of the Charter of the City of Oroville entitled \"OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES\" be amended by removing as officers of the City, a judge of the city court and a board of five library trustees, and providing that an increase or reduction, appointment or removal of any officer, assistant, deputy, clerk or employee by the Council requires a four-seventh's vote?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9798, "fingerprint": "2000|200000193|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000193|BUTTE", "content_hash": "16a02559f0ea0bbc", "measure_id": "200000193", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To finance those specific school facilities projects described in the District's bond plan, including improvements for student health and safety; money-saving energy improvements; replacing rented temporary portable classrooms; and to qualify for State grants for 80% of costs to modernize all elementary schools and 50% of construction costs of a new middle school (with the balance from Measure P Bonds); shall the Oroville City Elementary School District issue $9,875,000 in bonds bearing interest at no more than the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1518, "no_votes": 1236, "total_votes": 2754, "percent_yes": 55.119825708061, "percent_no": 44.880174291939, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.333170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.942316", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To finance those specific school facilities projects described in the District's bond plan, including improvements for student health and safety; money-saving energy improvements; replacing rented temporary portable classrooms; and to qualify for State grants for 80% of costs to modernize all elementary schools and 50% of construction costs of a new middle school (with the balance from Measure P Bonds); shall the Oroville City Elementary School District issue $9,875,000 in bonds bearing interest at no more than the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9797, "fingerprint": "2000|200000169|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000169|BUTTE", "content_hash": "54fb4ce40a39fa75", "measure_id": "200000169", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the purpose of constructing a multiuse facility, renovating and modernizing classrooms, acquiring, constructing, and renovating other school facilities and grounds, shall the Manzanita Elementary School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $1,000,000, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit to acquire, construct, and renovate school facilities and grounds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 170, "no_votes": 80, "total_votes": 250, "percent_yes": 68.0, "percent_no": 32.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.332896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.942121", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the purpose of constructing a multiuse facility, renovating and modernizing classrooms, acquiring, constructing, and renovating other school facilities and grounds, shall the Manzanita Elementary School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $1,000,000, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit to acquire, construct, and renovate school facilities and grounds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9799, "fingerprint": "2000|200000225|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000225|BUTTE", "content_hash": "9df9b00dd0ae2d0a", "measure_id": "200000225", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Palermo Union School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $3,000,000.00 for the purpose of finishing the modernization programs at Wilcox and Palermo Schools and building a new school within the Palermo Union School District, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 506, "no_votes": 369, "total_votes": 875, "percent_yes": 57.82857142857143, "percent_no": 42.17142857142857, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-09-26", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.333609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.942511", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Palermo Union School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $3,000,000.00 for the purpose of finishing the modernization programs at Wilcox and Palermo Schools and building a new school within the Palermo Union School District, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9806, "fingerprint": "2000|200000327|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000327|BUTTE", "content_hash": "b7dba61c6906a01e", "measure_id": "200000327", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the citizen initiative ordinance repealing Chapter 8.12 of the Paradise Municipal Code and adding a new Chapter 8.12 to the Paradise Municipal Code regulating trees in the Town of Paradise be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3059, "no_votes": 9162, "total_votes": 12221, "percent_yes": 25.03068488667048, "percent_no": 74.96931511332951, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.335490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.943852", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the citizen initiative ordinance repealing Chapter 8.12 of the Paradise Municipal Code and adding a new Chapter 8.12 to the Paradise Municipal Code regulating trees in the Town of Paradise be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9801, "fingerprint": "2000|200000322|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000322|BUTTE", "content_hash": "12ac0d37e0e3aa78", "measure_id": "200000322", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing local taxes, shall the City of Chico be authorized to approve development, construction or acquisition of dwelling units as affordable rental housing for low income persons, including the elderly and disabled?  Such housing shall only be owned by private developers who receive federal, state or local assistance.  Such authorizations shall be limited annually to an amount not to exceed 1% of the existing housing units in the City of Chico.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15022, "no_votes": 6053, "total_votes": 21075, "percent_yes": 71.27876631079478, "percent_no": 28.72123368920522, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.334154", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.942894", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing local taxes, shall the City of Chico be authorized to approve development, construction or acquisition of dwelling units as affordable rental housing for low income persons, including the elderly and disabled?  Such housing shall only be owned by private developers who receive federal, state or local assistance.  Such authorizations shall be limited annually to an amount not to exceed 1% of the existing housing units in the City of Chico.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9802, "fingerprint": "2000|200000323|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000323|BUTTE", "content_hash": "c251a8ea13b3c63f", "measure_id": "200000323", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 611 of the Chico City Charter be amended to allow ordinances to be published either in full or in summary, as authorized by State law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15475, "no_votes": 3755, "total_votes": 19230, "percent_yes": 80.47321892875715, "percent_no": 19.52678107124285, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.334422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.943085", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 611 of the Chico City Charter be amended to allow ordinances to be published either in full or in summary, as authorized by State law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9803, "fingerprint": "2000|200000324|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000324|BUTTE", "content_hash": "e8547736f6c8a4d7", "measure_id": "200000324", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 700 of the Chico City Charter be amended to remove the word \"his\" in reference to the qualifications of the city manager?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15355, "no_votes": 5253, "total_votes": 20608, "percent_yes": 74.50989906832298, "percent_no": 25.49010093167702, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.334688", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.943275", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 700 of the Chico City Charter be amended to remove the word \"his\" in reference to the qualifications of the city manager?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9805, "fingerprint": "2000|200000326|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000326|BUTTE", "content_hash": "92d3610fb87d0f61", "measure_id": "200000326", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the People's Choice Prison Initiative Ordinance relating to zoning all property within the City of Oroville as prison-free be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2168, "no_votes": 893, "total_votes": 3061, "percent_yes": 70.8265272786671, "percent_no": 29.1734727213329, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.335221", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.943657", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the People's Choice Prison Initiative Ordinance relating to zoning all property within the City of Oroville as prison-free be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9809, "fingerprint": "2000|200000328|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000328|COLUSA", "content_hash": "78745b933c98aec4", "measure_id": "200000328", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Williams Ordinance No. 121-00 which ordinance increases the rate of the City's transient occupancy tax from eight percent of the rent charged by a hotel to ten percent of the rent charged, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 302, "no_votes": 239, "total_votes": 541, "percent_yes": 55.822550831792974, "percent_no": 44.177449168207026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.336404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.944442", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Williams Ordinance No. 121-00 which ordinance increases the rate of the City's transient occupancy tax from eight percent of the rent charged by a hotel to ten percent of the rent charged, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9808, "fingerprint": "2000|200000117|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000117|COLUSA", "content_hash": "e011b4f038bfecf8", "measure_id": "200000117", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Pierce Joint Unified School District and for the election of each member of the governing board of the Pierce Joint Unified School District by the registered voters of the entire Pierce Joint Unified School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 574, "no_votes": 353, "total_votes": 927, "percent_yes": 61.92017259978425, "percent_no": 38.07982740021575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.336136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.944248", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Pierce Joint Unified School District and for the election of each member of the governing board of the Pierce Joint Unified School District by the registered voters of the entire Pierce Joint Unified School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9812, "fingerprint": "2000|200000043|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000043|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "380b88393c956f18", "measure_id": "200000043", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of El Cerrito impose a special tax in the minimum yearly amount of $58.46 per single family residential unit, and comparable amounts for multifamily and nonresidential property, collected with the property tax, for up to 20 years, to renovate the Swim Center, rehabilitate Canyon Trail Clubhouse, restore restrooms at Huber, Poinsett and Harding Parks and establish a dedicated fund with yearly and mandatory contributions from the general fund to maintain and replace city capital facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5918, "no_votes": 2913, "total_votes": 8831, "percent_yes": 67.01392820745102, "percent_no": 32.986071792548984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.337263", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.945028", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of El Cerrito impose a special tax in the minimum yearly amount of $58.46 per single family residential unit, and comparable amounts for multifamily and nonresidential property, collected with the property tax, for up to 20 years, to renovate the Swim Center, rehabilitate Canyon Trail Clubhouse, restore restrooms at Huber, Poinsett and Harding Parks and establish a dedicated fund with yearly and mandatory contributions from the general fund to maintain and replace city capital facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9813, "fingerprint": "2000|200000044|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000044|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "60939d2fa35fcbae", "measure_id": "200000044", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to elect members of the City Council of the City of Oakley at-large rather than by district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4097, "no_votes": 1368, "total_votes": 5465, "percent_yes": 74.967978042086, "percent_no": 25.032021957913997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.337593", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.945221", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to elect members of the City Council of the City of Oakley at-large rather than by district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9810, "fingerprint": "2000|200000006|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000006|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5571d24436c81f9d", "measure_id": "200000006", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 99-47 of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County be approved so as to authorize a one-time special tax of no more than $75 per residential property to fund the development and consideration of a general plan amendment and zoning ordinance regulations to establish in the Diablo Community Services District area a Floor Area Ratios proportionality between houses and their lot sizes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233, "no_votes": 271, "total_votes": 504, "percent_yes": 46.230158730158735, "percent_no": 53.769841269841265, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.336673", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.944637", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 99-47 of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County be approved so as to authorize a one-time special tax of no more than $75 per residential property to fund the development and consideration of a general plan amendment and zoning ordinance regulations to establish in the Diablo Community Services District area a Floor Area Ratios proportionality between houses and their lot sizes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9811, "fingerprint": "2000|200000007|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000007|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d9a416f70f09a1d5", "measure_id": "200000007", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Should the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors amend the General Plan and the Zoning Code as they apply to the Diablo area to adopt a Floor Area Ratio Ordinance substantially in the form mailed to the Diablo residents on or about December 10, 1999, and a copy of which is available for public inspection at the District 3 Supervisor's office 309 Diablo Road, Danville, CA, so as to provide proportionality between house and lot size?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233, "no_votes": 272, "total_votes": 505, "percent_yes": 46.13861386138614, "percent_no": 53.86138613861386, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.336973", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.944836", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Should the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors amend the General Plan and the Zoning Code as they apply to the Diablo area to adopt a Floor Area Ratio Ordinance substantially in the form mailed to the Diablo residents on or about December 10, 1999, and a copy of which is available for public inspection at the District 3 Supervisor's office 309 Diablo Road, Danville, CA, so as to provide proportionality between house and lot size?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9814, "fingerprint": "2000|200000158|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000158|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "c2c0d42ab1d0e7cb", "measure_id": "200000158", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and expand educational programs currently funded from local parcel taxes, shall the Acalanes Union High School District's Qualified Special Tax be reauthorized and increased by $49 to a total rate of $111 per year per taxable parcel in each year from July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2006, to finance: (a) smaller class sizes; (b) classroom instructional materials; (c) classroom technology; (d) expanded student access to additional elective, college preparatory, advanced placement, and honors courses; (e) expanded student access to a 7-period day; and (f) other services dirctly related to student support and educational preparation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13963, "no_votes": 8196, "total_votes": 22159, "percent_yes": 63.012771334446505, "percent_no": 36.987228665553495, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.337924", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.945415", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and expand educational programs currently funded from local parcel taxes, shall the Acalanes Union High School District's Qualified Special Tax be reauthorized and increased by $49 to a total rate of $111 per year per taxable parcel in each year from July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2006, to finance: (a) smaller class sizes; (b) classroom instructional materials; (c) classroom technology; (d) expanded student access to additional elective, college preparatory, advanced placement, and honors courses; (e) expanded student access to a 7-period day; and (f) other services dirctly related to student support and educational preparation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9827, "fingerprint": "2000|200000508|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000508|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d32c15e520200fa5", "measure_id": "200000508", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To meet the expanding educational and job training needs of Contra Costa County, shall Contra Costa Community College District (Contra Costa College, Diablo Valley College, Los Medanos College, Brentwood Center and San Ramon Valley Center) issue its first bonds since 1948 in the amount of $236,000,000 at interest rates within legal limits to repair and renovate classrooms, upgrade science and computer labs, and modernize, construct, acquire, and improve property for instructional and instructional support facilities, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee established to ensure funds are spent properly?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 220712, "no_votes": 127328, "total_votes": 348040, "percent_yes": 63.41569934490289, "percent_no": 36.58430065509711, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.341694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.947991", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To meet the expanding educational and job training needs of Contra Costa County, shall Contra Costa Community College District (Contra Costa College, Diablo Valley College, Los Medanos College, Brentwood Center and San Ramon Valley Center) issue its first bonds since 1948 in the amount of $236,000,000 at interest rates within legal limits to repair and renovate classrooms, upgrade science and computer labs, and modernize, construct, acquire, and improve property for instructional and instructional support facilities, with a Citizens' Oversight Committee established to ensure funds are spent properly?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9815, "fingerprint": "2000|200000233|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000233|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "afb7ad8b146a2a17", "measure_id": "200000233", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall County Ordinance 99-51 be approved, restoring and improving local library services by increasing days and hours neighborhood libraries are open; replacing worn and outdated books and materials; expanding reading and educational programs for children and services for adults, seniors, and businesses; providing funds for needed repairs; and updating computers and technology, temporarily increasing the sales tax by one eighth of one percent, exclusively for specific library services and automatically expiring after eight years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 233301, "no_votes": 119707, "total_votes": 353008, "percent_yes": 66.08943706658206, "percent_no": 33.910562933417935, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.338198", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.945611", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall County Ordinance 99-51 be approved, restoring and improving local library services by increasing days and hours neighborhood libraries are open; replacing worn and outdated books and materials; expanding reading and educational programs for children and services for adults, seniors, and businesses; providing funds for needed repairs; and updating computers and technology, temporarily increasing the sales tax by one eighth of one percent, exclusively for specific library services and automatically expiring after eight years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9828, "fingerprint": "2000|200000509|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000509|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "fd8ad893b0b3ba5b", "measure_id": "200000509", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the learning climate for children and relieve overcrowding by improving elementary schools through building classrooms, repairing and renovating bathrooms, electrical, plumbing, heating and ventilation systems, leaking roofs and fire safety systems, improving technology, making seismic upgrades, and replacing deteriorating portable classrooms and buildings, shall the West Contra Costa Unified School District issue $150,000,000 in bonds at authorized rates, to renovate, acquire, construct and modernize school facilities, and appoint a citizen's oversight committee to guarantee funds are spent accordingly?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53918, "no_votes": 15697, "total_votes": 69615, "percent_yes": 77.45169862816923, "percent_no": 22.548301371830775, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.341961", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.948183", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the learning climate for children and relieve overcrowding by improving elementary schools through building classrooms, repairing and renovating bathrooms, electrical, plumbing, heating and ventilation systems, leaking roofs and fire safety systems, improving technology, making seismic upgrades, and replacing deteriorating portable classrooms and buildings, shall the West Contra Costa Unified School District issue $150,000,000 in bonds at authorized rates, to renovate, acquire, construct and modernize school facilities, and appoint a citizen's oversight committee to guarantee funds are spent accordingly?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9818, "fingerprint": "2000|200000329|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000329|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e654693e8a7de8a1", "measure_id": "200000329", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Brentwood eliminate the elective office of Mayor and re-establish the procedure of selection of Mayor by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1028, "no_votes": 7183, "total_votes": 8211, "percent_yes": 12.519790524905613, "percent_no": 87.48020947509438, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.339128", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.946199", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Brentwood eliminate the elective office of Mayor and re-establish the procedure of selection of Mayor by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9819, "fingerprint": "2000|200000330|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000330|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "38d049cf45430096", "measure_id": "200000330", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the Initiative be adopted to amend the Clayton General Plan to require voter approval for specified land use decisions involving ten or more dwelling units, conversion of more than two acres of contiguous open space to non-open space uses, and for proposed commercial developments involving 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or more?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2598, "no_votes": 3254, "total_votes": 5852, "percent_yes": 44.39507860560492, "percent_no": 55.60492139439508, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.339424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.946395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the Initiative be adopted to amend the Clayton General Plan to require voter approval for specified land use decisions involving ten or more dwelling units, conversion of more than two acres of contiguous open space to non-open space uses, and for proposed commercial developments involving 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or more?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9820, "fingerprint": "2000|200000331|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000331|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "a7c9a8f1533ed1c1", "measure_id": "200000331", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be enacted which will authorize the City Council to impose an excise tax on use of gas and electricity by residents and businesses, for general government purposes and to be deposited in the City's general fund, at a rate of 2.4% per billing period?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1527, "no_votes": 4228, "total_votes": 5755, "percent_yes": 26.53344917463076, "percent_no": 73.46655082536924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.339694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.946589", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be enacted which will authorize the City Council to impose an excise tax on use of gas and electricity by residents and businesses, for general government purposes and to be deposited in the City's general fund, at a rate of 2.4% per billing period?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9821, "fingerprint": "2000|200000332|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000332|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8b6e1cc4d662657b", "measure_id": "200000332", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you want \"The Grove\" property (the one-acre vacant parcel in the downtown on Marsh Creek Road between Main and Center Streets) to be developed as a one-acre park at a cost of approximately $150,000 per year to include construction and maintenance costs and to be paid from any new general fund tax revenues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3176, "no_votes": 2574, "total_votes": 5750, "percent_yes": 55.23478260869565, "percent_no": 44.76521739130435, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.339960", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.946781", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you want \"The Grove\" property (the one-acre vacant parcel in the downtown on Marsh Creek Road between Main and Center Streets) to be developed as a one-acre park at a cost of approximately $150,000 per year to include construction and maintenance costs and to be paid from any new general fund tax revenues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9822, "fingerprint": "2000|200000333|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000333|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "97ee00f1113b893f", "measure_id": "200000333", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the Town of Danville enact an initiative ordinance known as the Danville Public Planning Initiative that would amend the Town's General Plan to create an Urban Growth Boundary and require voter approval for specified land use decisions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10707, "no_votes": 9439, "total_votes": 20146, "percent_yes": 53.14702670505312, "percent_no": 46.85297329494688, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.340224", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.946971", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the Town of Danville enact an initiative ordinance known as the Danville Public Planning Initiative that would amend the Town's General Plan to create an Urban Growth Boundary and require voter approval for specified land use decisions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9823, "fingerprint": "2000|200000334|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000334|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "83fc2ec12292a2e4", "measure_id": "200000334", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the Town of Danville enact an amendment to the Town's General Plan, known as the Danville Open Space Preservation Initiative, to preserve Agricultural, General Open Space and Parks and Recreation Land Use Designations and requiring voter approval for future general plan amendments to lands with those designations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15000, "no_votes": 5161, "total_votes": 20161, "percent_yes": 74.4010713754278, "percent_no": 25.598928624572196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.340492", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.947161", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the Town of Danville enact an amendment to the Town's General Plan, known as the Danville Open Space Preservation Initiative, to preserve Agricultural, General Open Space and Parks and Recreation Land Use Designations and requiring voter approval for future general plan amendments to lands with those designations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9825, "fingerprint": "2000|200000336|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000336|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "87d8c8c8a8de052b", "measure_id": "200000336", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending Chapter 2.08 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code by adding Section 2.08.031 providing for City Council control of the cost, standards and levels of legal services, and requiring the City Council to be responsible for maintaining the efficiency and effectiveness of legal services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7928, "no_votes": 6578, "total_votes": 14506, "percent_yes": 54.65324693230388, "percent_no": 45.34675306769612, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.341128", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.947556", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending Chapter 2.08 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code by adding Section 2.08.031 providing for City Council control of the cost, standards and levels of legal services, and requiring the City Council to be responsible for maintaining the efficiency and effectiveness of legal services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9826, "fingerprint": "2000|200000337|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000337|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "460e01214485038e", "measure_id": "200000337", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending Chapter 2.08 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code by adding Section 2.08.035 providing for a full time city attorney with a salary cap of up to $125,000 per year, plus cost of living increases, and provided for city council review of the city attorney's office, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5109, "no_votes": 9529, "total_votes": 14638, "percent_yes": 34.90230905861456, "percent_no": 65.09769094138544, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.341424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.947782", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending Chapter 2.08 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code by adding Section 2.08.035 providing for a full time city attorney with a salary cap of up to $125,000 per year, plus cost of living increases, and provided for city council review of the city attorney's office, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9824, "fingerprint": "2000|200000335|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000335|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "fea8f25a3319274d", "measure_id": "200000335", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Discovery Bay adopt the additional purposes of providing for the collection or disposal of garbage or refuse matter; protection against fire; provision of street lighting; provision of mosquito abatement; the equipment and maintenance of a police department, other police protection, or other security services to protect and safeguard life and property; to acquire sites for, construct, and maintain library buildings, and to cooperate with other governmental agencies for library service; the constructing, opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing, and maintaining, in whole or in part, of any street in the district, together with the construction and improvement of bridges, culverts, curbs, gutters, drains, and works incidental thereto, subject to the consent of the governing body of the county or city in which the improvement is to be made; to contract for ambulance service to serve the residents of the district as convenience requires; to provide transportation services; to abate graffiti; to construct, maintain, and operate flood protection works and facilities, subject to the following conditions: (1) The planning, design, construction, maintenance, and operation of flood protection works and facilities, or substantially similar works or facilities, is not within the authority of another public agency, except that a public agency and the district are not precluded from entering into agreements for the district to provide those services (2) The governing body of the city or county in which the services specified in paragraph (1) are to be provided by the district has consented to the district providing those services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2502, "no_votes": 1117, "total_votes": 3619, "percent_yes": 69.13512019894998, "percent_no": 30.864879801050023, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.340807", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.947355", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Discovery Bay adopt the additional purposes of providing for the collection or disposal of garbage or refuse matter; protection against fire; provision of street lighting; provision of mosquito abatement; the equipment and maintenance of a police department, other police protection, or other security services to protect and safeguard life and property; to acquire sites for, construct, and maintain library buildings, and to cooperate with other governmental agencies for library service; the constructing, opening, widening, extending, straightening, surfacing, and maintaining, in whole or in part, of any street in the district, together with the construction and improvement of bridges, culverts, curbs, gutters, drains, and works incidental thereto, subject to the consent of the governing body of the county or city in which the improvement is to be made; to contract for ambulance service to serve the residents of the district as convenience requires; to provide transportation services; to abate graffiti; to construct, maintain, and operate flood protection works and facilities, subject to the following conditions: (1) The planning, design, construction, maintenance, and operation of flood protection works and facilities, or substantially similar works or facilities, is not within the authority of another public agency, except that a public agency and the district are not precluded from entering into agreements for the district to provide those services (2) The governing body of the city or county in which the services specified in paragraph (1) are to be provided by the district has consented to the district providing those services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9816, "fingerprint": "2000|200000234|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000234|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "03d91f2a050d911c", "measure_id": "200000234", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area M-8 be maintained at $600,000, as previously approved by the voters of the Service Area, and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the fiscal years 2000/2001 through 2003/2004 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2196, "no_votes": 767, "total_votes": 2963, "percent_yes": 74.11407357408032, "percent_no": 25.885926425919678, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.338470", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.945805", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area M-8 be maintained at $600,000, as previously approved by the voters of the Service Area, and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the fiscal years 2000/2001 through 2003/2004 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9817, "fingerprint": "2000|200000235|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000235|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "5539fec53ae51dd9", "measure_id": "200000235", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance 2000-26 of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County be approved so as to authorize a special tax increase on property located in County Service Area P-2 (Zone B), from $18 to $36 per parcel for single residential property for the first fiscal year, and not to exceed $54 per parcel per year for single residential property in succeeding years, with corresponding increases for properties in other use categories identified in the ordinance (i.e., small multiple residential, large multiple residential, and commercial/industrial/institutional), in order to provide additional funding for police protection service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2556, "no_votes": 2232, "total_votes": 4788, "percent_yes": 53.38345864661655, "percent_no": 46.61654135338345, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.338821", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.946004", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 2000-26 of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County be approved so as to authorize a special tax increase on property located in County Service Area P-2 (Zone B), from $18 to $36 per parcel for single residential property for the first fiscal year, and not to exceed $54 per parcel per year for single residential property in succeeding years, with corresponding increases for properties in other use categories identified in the ordinance (i.e., small multiple residential, large multiple residential, and commercial/industrial/institutional), in order to provide additional funding for police protection service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9831, "fingerprint": "2000|200000215|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000215|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "765dc85878590083", "measure_id": "200000215", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Hillwood Community Services District be authorized to tax each parcel within the District $10.00 per month for the maintenance improvement of roadways and for the other lawful purposes of the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64, "no_votes": 76, "total_votes": 140, "percent_yes": 45.71428571428571, "percent_no": 54.28571428571429, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-07-18", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.342827", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.948779", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Hillwood Community Services District be authorized to tax each parcel within the District $10.00 per month for the maintenance improvement of roadways and for the other lawful purposes of the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9832, "fingerprint": "2000|200000216|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000216|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "efa29cf8b1bca647", "measure_id": "200000216", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Golden West Community Services District be authorized to increase the present tax of $120.00 per year by $120.00 per year for a total not to exceed $240.00, and to annually tax each parcel within the District said amount of $240.00 for the improvement and maintenance of roadways and easements within the District, and for other lawful purposes of the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 189, "no_votes": 229, "total_votes": 418, "percent_yes": 45.21531100478468, "percent_no": 54.78468899521532, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-07-18", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.343094", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.948976", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Golden West Community Services District be authorized to increase the present tax of $120.00 per year by $120.00 per year for a total not to exceed $240.00, and to annually tax each parcel within the District said amount of $240.00 for the improvement and maintenance of roadways and easements within the District, and for other lawful purposes of the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9833, "fingerprint": "2000|200000217|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000217|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "e2a57fd3d0a79ce8", "measure_id": "200000217", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in the amounts as shown on Exhibit A on each parcel of real property within the boundaries of the Green Valley Oaks Road Zone of Benefit #69 commencing with fiscal year 2000/01 and each year thereafter?  Said tax is to be assessed and collected with El Dorado County General Taxes commencing with the forthcoming 2000/01 fiscal year and continuing each year thereafter, and shall be used only for those purposes authorized by the zone of benefit under County Service Area law.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62, "no_votes": 8, "total_votes": 70, "percent_yes": 88.57142857142857, "percent_no": 11.42857142857143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-07-18", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.343455", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.949172", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in the amounts as shown on Exhibit A on each parcel of real property within the boundaries of the Green Valley Oaks Road Zone of Benefit #69 commencing with fiscal year 2000/01 and each year thereafter?  Said tax is to be assessed and collected with El Dorado County General Taxes commencing with the forthcoming 2000/01 fiscal year and continuing each year thereafter, and shall be used only for those purposes authorized by the zone of benefit under County Service Area law.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9834, "fingerprint": "2000|200000218|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000218|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "02078292181a42ee", "measure_id": "200000218", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Lakeview Community Services District be authorized to increase the present tax of $60.00 per year for a total not to exceed $120.00, and to annually tax each parcel within the District said amount to $120.00 for the improvement and maintenance of roadways and easements within the District, and for other lawful purposes of the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34, "no_votes": 28, "total_votes": 62, "percent_yes": 54.83870967741935, "percent_no": 45.16129032258065, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-07-18", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.343771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.949369", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Lakeview Community Services District be authorized to increase the present tax of $60.00 per year for a total not to exceed $120.00, and to annually tax each parcel within the District said amount to $120.00 for the improvement and maintenance of roadways and easements within the District, and for other lawful purposes of the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9835, "fingerprint": "2000|200000221|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000221|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "dc9de7cf9740f607", "measure_id": "200000221", "measure_letter": "G1", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Question #1: Shall a special tax providing funds for the maintenance and repair of existing roads within the Nashville Trail Community Services District be established at the rate of $300.00 per year and assessed against each parcel within the District, and shall a total appropriations limit be established equal to the amount of the special tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30, "no_votes": 24, "total_votes": 54, "percent_yes": 55.55555555555556, "percent_no": 44.44444444444444, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-08-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.344050", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.949569", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Question #1: Shall a special tax providing funds for the maintenance and repair of existing roads within the Nashville Trail Community Services District be established at the rate of $300.00 per year and assessed against each parcel within the District, and shall a total appropriations limit be established equal to the amount of the special tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12051, "fingerprint": "2000|200000222|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000222|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "8d67b3c05f0f9246", "measure_id": "200000222", "measure_letter": "G2", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Question #2: Shall owners of more than one parcel within the District be assessed $300.00 for the first parcel owned with or without a dwelling unit, and be assessed another $300.00 for each additional parcel owned only if it contains a dwelling unit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28, "no_votes": 24, "total_votes": 52, "percent_yes": 53.84615384615385, "percent_no": 46.15384615384615, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-08-08", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.172484", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.344348", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.949767", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Question #2: Shall owners of more than one parcel within the District be assessed $300.00 for the first parcel owned with or without a dwelling unit, and be assessed another $300.00 for each additional parcel owned only if it contains a dwelling unit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9837, "fingerprint": "2000|200000236|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000236|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "d28f5ed1f325e9f8", "measure_id": "200000236", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure H, entitled \"An Initiative Ordinance Requiring the Expenditure of at Least One-Half of the 'Vehicle In-Lieu Tax' Revenues Received by the County of El Dorado Annually on Roads, Ways and Highways for Specified Purposes,\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39343, "no_votes": 25365, "total_votes": 64708, "percent_yes": 60.80082833652717, "percent_no": 39.19917166347283, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.344979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.950150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure H, entitled \"An Initiative Ordinance Requiring the Expenditure of at Least One-Half of the 'Vehicle In-Lieu Tax' Revenues Received by the County of El Dorado Annually on Roads, Ways and Highways for Specified Purposes,\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9829, "fingerprint": "2000|200000118|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000118|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "5c4b92079b1dd5a0", "measure_id": "200000118", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25692, "no_votes": 17181, "total_votes": 42873, "percent_yes": 59.92582744384578, "percent_no": 40.07417255615422, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.342226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.948382", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9838, "fingerprint": "2000|200000237|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000237|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "6254fbf0147133dc", "measure_id": "200000237", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County be authorized to use that portion of its sales tax revenues generated by new development to pay for building road capacity improvements to offset the impacts of traffic generated by non-residential development as allowed under Policy 3.2.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38236, "no_votes": 26872, "total_votes": 65108, "percent_yes": 58.72703815199362, "percent_no": 41.27296184800638, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.345292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.950340", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County be authorized to use that portion of its sales tax revenues generated by new development to pay for building road capacity improvements to offset the impacts of traffic generated by non-residential development as allowed under Policy 3.2.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9830, "fingerprint": "2000|200000152|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000152|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "389007775e8dd11c", "measure_id": "200000152", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a library, classrooms, and a computer lab and acquire a portable building for Miller's High School, to construct a multipurpose room and modernize Latrobe School, to furnish and equip its schools to the extent permitted by law, and to qualify for State modernization funds, shall the Latrobe School District incur bonded indebtedness of $2,100,000 at an interest rate not exceeding the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 266, "no_votes": 249, "total_votes": 515, "percent_yes": 51.6504854368932, "percent_no": 48.3495145631068, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.342530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.948582", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a library, classrooms, and a computer lab and acquire a portable building for Miller's High School, to construct a multipurpose room and modernize Latrobe School, to furnish and equip its schools to the extent permitted by law, and to qualify for State modernization funds, shall the Latrobe School District incur bonded indebtedness of $2,100,000 at an interest rate not exceeding the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9839, "fingerprint": "2000|200000510|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000510|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "5c4b92079b1dd5a0", "measure_id": "200000510", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30284, "no_votes": 24396, "total_votes": 54680, "percent_yes": 55.38405267008047, "percent_no": 44.61594732991953, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.345561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.950534", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9836, "fingerprint": "2000|200000223|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000223|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "716b8fcbe487cc6b", "measure_id": "200000223", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain new bike trails, acquire, construct and equip athletic fields and an ice rink, upgrade Paradise Park facilities, qualify for $12.5 million in County/State grants, and fund reserves shall (i) Community Facilities District No. 2000-1 of the South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities Joint Powers Authority issue $6,500,000 of bonds; (ii) levy special taxes to pay for such facilities, for maintenance thereof, and incidental expenses, including debt service on such bonds; (iii) establish the District's annual appropriations limit at $6,500,000, all as provided in Resolutions 05 and 06 of the Authority?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3369, "no_votes": 1511, "total_votes": 4880, "percent_yes": 69.03688524590163, "percent_no": 30.96311475409837, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-09-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.344678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.949958", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain new bike trails, acquire, construct and equip athletic fields and an ice rink, upgrade Paradise Park facilities, qualify for $12.5 million in County/State grants, and fund reserves shall (i) Community Facilities District No. 2000-1 of the South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities Joint Powers Authority issue $6,500,000 of bonds; (ii) levy special taxes to pay for such facilities, for maintenance thereof, and incidental expenses, including debt service on such bonds; (iii) establish the District's annual appropriations limit at $6,500,000, all as provided in Resolutions 05 and 06 of the Authority?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9844, "fingerprint": "2000|200000339|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000339|FRESNO", "content_hash": "652ce9a3bd10b6df", "measure_id": "200000339", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Louis C. Rodriguez be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 328, "no_votes": 214, "total_votes": 542, "percent_yes": 60.51660516605166, "percent_no": 39.48339483394834, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.348442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.952292", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Louis C. Rodriguez be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9845, "fingerprint": "2000|200000340|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000340|FRESNO", "content_hash": "e3f0ac6185ab783d", "measure_id": "200000340", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ramon R. Dominguez be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 310, "no_votes": 236, "total_votes": 546, "percent_yes": 56.77655677655677, "percent_no": 43.22344322344323, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.348720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.952481", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ramon R. Dominguez be recalled (removed) from the office of Member of City Council of the City of Huron?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12055, "fingerprint": "2000|200000238|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000238|FRESNO", "content_hash": "0d156e4fc9586e59", "measure_id": "200000238", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 00-009 of the Fresno County Arts to Zoo 2000 Authority be approved to provide additional funding to enhance cultural, artistic, historical, and natural science nonprofit organizations by imposing a transactions and use tax at the rate of one-quarter of one percent for a maximum of 10 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 111107, "no_votes": 93438, "total_votes": 204545, "percent_yes": 54.31909848688553, "percent_no": 45.68090151311447, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.174810", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.347880", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.951905", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 00-009 of the Fresno County Arts to Zoo 2000 Authority be approved to provide additional funding to enhance cultural, artistic, historical, and natural science nonprofit organizations by imposing a transactions and use tax at the rate of one-quarter of one percent for a maximum of 10 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12054, "fingerprint": "2000|200000170|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000170|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b4679002d6b7a7eb", "measure_id": "200000170", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Laton Joint Unified School District repair and modernize its thirty to fifty year old schools, upgrade deteriorating plumbing, heating, cooling, ventilation and improve electrical systems to meet current technology needs, renovate classrooms, construct a multi-use room, kitchen and bathrooms to improve current safety conditions, with annual audits and no money for staff salaries, by issuing $2.25 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 152, "no_votes": 122, "total_votes": 274, "percent_yes": 55.47445255474452, "percent_no": 44.52554744525548, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.174590", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.347596", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.951709", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Laton Joint Unified School District repair and modernize its thirty to fifty year old schools, upgrade deteriorating plumbing, heating, cooling, ventilation and improve electrical systems to meet current technology needs, renovate classrooms, construct a multi-use room, kitchen and bathrooms to improve current safety conditions, with annual audits and no money for staff salaries, by issuing $2.25 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12053, "fingerprint": "2000|200000160|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000160|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b66af05572c68d0e", "measure_id": "200000160", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District incur a bonded indebtedness not exceeding Thirty One Million Dollars ($31,000,000) to acquire and construct three new school sites including a K-8 elementary school in Reedley, a K-8 elementary school in Orange Cove, and a magnet high school in Orange Cove at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit and subject to all the accountability requirements of Article XIII A, Section 1 of the California Constitution as amended?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2486, "no_votes": 1342, "total_votes": 3828, "percent_yes": 64.9425287356322, "percent_no": 35.057471264367805, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.174306", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.347296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.951510", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District incur a bonded indebtedness not exceeding Thirty One Million Dollars ($31,000,000) to acquire and construct three new school sites including a K-8 elementary school in Reedley, a K-8 elementary school in Orange Cove, and a magnet high school in Orange Cove at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit and subject to all the accountability requirements of Article XIII A, Section 1 of the California Constitution as amended?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12052, "fingerprint": "2000|200000159|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000159|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b745fdbfd5d9a643", "measure_id": "200000159", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, reduce overcrowding at existing schools, construct additional classrooms, repair and upgrade all schools in the District, modernize heating, ventilation, and electrical systems, provide students with access to modern technology, and make the District eligible to receive over $5.3 million in state-matching funds, shall the Dos Palmos-Oro Loma Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $3.5 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 130, "no_votes": 62, "total_votes": 192, "percent_yes": 67.70833333333334, "percent_no": 32.29166666666666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.174098", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.346753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.951312", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, reduce overcrowding at existing schools, construct additional classrooms, repair and upgrade all schools in the District, modernize heating, ventilation, and electrical systems, provide students with access to modern technology, and make the District eligible to receive over $5.3 million in state-matching funds, shall the Dos Palmos-Oro Loma Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $3.5 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9840, "fingerprint": "2000|200000045|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000045|FRESNO", "content_hash": "5938b3c5cc869773", "measure_id": "200000045", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to give owners of single family homes the option to request a water meter and a metered water rate, rather than being billed at a flat rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31693, "no_votes": 43258, "total_votes": 74951, "percent_yes": 42.28495950687783, "percent_no": 57.71504049312217, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.345831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.950731", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to give owners of single family homes the option to request a water meter and a metered water rate, rather than being billed at a flat rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9841, "fingerprint": "2000|200000046|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000046|FRESNO", "content_hash": "d996e10944f9e492", "measure_id": "200000046", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Joaquin be authorized to implement a utility user's tax of ten percent (10%) upon users of electricity, gas, telephone service, water and cable television in the City of San Joaquin with the tax terminating on the twentieth anniversary of its effective date as set forth in Ordinance 99-101?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13, "no_votes": 212, "total_votes": 225, "percent_yes": 5.77777777777777, "percent_no": 94.22222222222223, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.346100", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.950925", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Joaquin be authorized to implement a utility user's tax of ten percent (10%) upon users of electricity, gas, telephone service, water and cable television in the City of San Joaquin with the tax terminating on the twentieth anniversary of its effective date as set forth in Ordinance 99-101?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9843, "fingerprint": "2000|200000338|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000338|FRESNO", "content_hash": "62f1ef200ff8fa94", "measure_id": "200000338", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fresno increase the transient room tax (hotel room tax) from 12% to 13% for persons staying in hotels?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30478, "no_votes": 71938, "total_votes": 102416, "percent_yes": 29.75902202780816, "percent_no": 70.24097797219184, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.348164", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.952103", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fresno increase the transient room tax (hotel room tax) from 12% to 13% for persons staying in hotels?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9846, "fingerprint": "2000|200000341|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000341|FRESNO", "content_hash": "44d07dc59368f5d4", "measure_id": "200000341", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the City Council of the City of Kingsburg be advised by the voters of the City of Kingsburg to spend utility user tax funds for parks and recreation, senior citizen and community beautification programs and purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2163, "no_votes": 1163, "total_votes": 3326, "percent_yes": 65.03307276007216, "percent_no": 34.96692723992784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.348988", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.952672", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the City Council of the City of Kingsburg be advised by the voters of the City of Kingsburg to spend utility user tax funds for parks and recreation, senior citizen and community beautification programs and purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9847, "fingerprint": "2000|200000342|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000342|FRESNO", "content_hash": "5153a5c17cb7cfb7", "measure_id": "200000342", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council of the City of Kingsburg enact a two percent (2%) utility users tax ordinance for general city purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1181, "no_votes": 2161, "total_votes": 3342, "percent_yes": 35.33812088569719, "percent_no": 64.66187911430282, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.349260", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.952866", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council of the City of Kingsburg enact a two percent (2%) utility users tax ordinance for general city purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9842, "fingerprint": "2000|200000119|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000119|FRESNO", "content_hash": "961003302639ba5e", "measure_id": "200000119", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, build a new Science Center and expand support facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 100, "no_votes": 76, "total_votes": 176, "percent_yes": 56.81818181818182, "percent_no": 43.18181818181818, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.346425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.951120", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, build a new Science Center and expand support facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9848, "fingerprint": "2000|200000511|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000511|FRESNO", "content_hash": "961003302639ba5e", "measure_id": "200000511", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, build a new Science Center and expand support facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 105, "no_votes": 122, "total_votes": 227, "percent_yes": 46.25550660792951, "percent_no": 53.74449339207049, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.349543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.953059", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, build a new Science Center and expand support facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9849, "fingerprint": "2000|200000239|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000239|GLENN", "content_hash": "814c967f1a9dadfb", "measure_id": "200000239", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Glenn County Code Section 4.12.030, which sets the tax charged to persons who temporarily rent hotel and motel rooms, be amended from five to ten percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3591, "no_votes": 4754, "total_votes": 8345, "percent_yes": 43.03175554224087, "percent_no": 56.96824445775913, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.349815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.953257", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Glenn County Code Section 4.12.030, which sets the tax charged to persons who temporarily rent hotel and motel rooms, be amended from five to ten percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9851, "fingerprint": "2000|200000344|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000344|GLENN", "content_hash": "a99fc886bb7de095", "measure_id": "200000344", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 8 percent to 10 percent be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1019, "no_votes": 858, "total_votes": 1877, "percent_yes": 54.28875865743207, "percent_no": 45.71124134256793, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.350490", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.953641", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 8 percent to 10 percent be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9850, "fingerprint": "2000|200000343|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000343|GLENN", "content_hash": "a99fc886bb7de095", "measure_id": "200000343", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 8 percent to 10 percent be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 584, "no_votes": 1086, "total_votes": 1670, "percent_yes": 34.97005988023952, "percent_no": 65.02994011976048, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.350184", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.953451", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 8 percent to 10 percent be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9855, "fingerprint": "2000|200000513|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000513|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ca0ea7d92f843053", "measure_id": "200000513", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct school facilities and remove safety hazards, shall the Peninsula Union Elementary School District incur bonded indebtedness of $1,080,000 at interest rates within legal limits, for purposes including: modernizing schools for computer technology including a new library/media center; removing asbestos, repairing roofs and improving earthquake safety; improving playgrounds; upgrading security, fire, and safety systems including outdoor lighting and; building a meeting room for community school use?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43, "no_votes": 32, "total_votes": 75, "percent_yes": 57.333333333333336, "percent_no": 42.666666666666664, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.351608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.954413", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct school facilities and remove safety hazards, shall the Peninsula Union Elementary School District incur bonded indebtedness of $1,080,000 at interest rates within legal limits, for purposes including: modernizing schools for computer technology including a new library/media center; removing asbestos, repairing roofs and improving earthquake safety; improving playgrounds; upgrading security, fire, and safety systems including outdoor lighting and; building a meeting room for community school use?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9852, "fingerprint": "2000|200000224|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000224|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "c1f1f902692768c6", "measure_id": "200000224", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms in the Freshwater School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, replace flooring, update electrical service, provide shelving, painting, heating system upgrades and lighting; construct classrooms to accomodate class size reduction; and build and/or remodel facilities including a gymnasium/community center on the school campus shall the District issue $1.3 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 218, "no_votes": 92, "total_votes": 310, "percent_yes": 70.3225806451613, "percent_no": 29.677419354838705, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-09-19", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.350795", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.953832", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms in the Freshwater School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, replace flooring, update electrical service, provide shelving, painting, heating system upgrades and lighting; construct classrooms to accomodate class size reduction; and build and/or remodel facilities including a gymnasium/community center on the school campus shall the District issue $1.3 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9853, "fingerprint": "2000|200000345|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000345|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "d03e2123377815f7", "measure_id": "200000345", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arcata adopt a utility users tax (Resolution No. 990-64) which shall impose a three percent (3%) general tax on the use of certain utility services which shall go into effect December 1, 2000, at which time the City's current three percent (3%) utility users tax will expire?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4146, "no_votes": 3063, "total_votes": 7209, "percent_yes": 57.511444028297966, "percent_no": 42.488555971702034, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.351069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.954027", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arcata adopt a utility users tax (Resolution No. 990-64) which shall impose a three percent (3%) general tax on the use of certain utility services which shall go into effect December 1, 2000, at which time the City's current three percent (3%) utility users tax will expire?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9854, "fingerprint": "2000|200000512|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000512|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "59ea22175ed89d63", "measure_id": "200000512", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade classrooms in the Fieldbrook School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, replace flooring and windows, update electrical service and lighting; modernize the kitchen, upgrade the septic system, develop a permanent stage area in the music room, and build and/or remodel facilities including bathrooms for the kindergarten classrooms, but in no event to pay school salaries, shall the District issue $450,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 298, "no_votes": 100, "total_votes": 398, "percent_yes": 74.87437185929649, "percent_no": 25.125628140703512, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.351339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.954218", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade classrooms in the Fieldbrook School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, replace flooring and windows, update electrical service and lighting; modernize the kitchen, upgrade the septic system, develop a permanent stage area in the music room, and build and/or remodel facilities including bathrooms for the kindergarten classrooms, but in no event to pay school salaries, shall the District issue $450,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9857, "fingerprint": "2000|200000047|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000047|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "56816127a83a3574", "measure_id": "200000047", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 989 be adopted to impose a four year tax in order to maintain general City government services beginning at a rate of 5% and declining 1% annually to be imposed upon the following utility services: defined telephone, electrical, gas, cable television, and for collection, removal, and disposal of garbage, rubbish, and other refuse services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 616, "no_votes": 2583, "total_votes": 3199, "percent_yes": 19.25601750547046, "percent_no": 80.74398249452955, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.352259", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.954801", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 989 be adopted to impose a four year tax in order to maintain general City government services beginning at a rate of 5% and declining 1% annually to be imposed upon the following utility services: defined telephone, electrical, gas, cable television, and for collection, removal, and disposal of garbage, rubbish, and other refuse services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9856, "fingerprint": "2000|200000008|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000008|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "b1e318246a4ac10a", "measure_id": "200000008", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Imperial County Ordinance No. 1309, which would impose, for a period not to exceed eight years, a transactions and use tax (I.e. sales tax) of one-half percent (0.5%), upon retail transactions within the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County be adopted and the revenues used for general governmental purposes and distributed amongst the County of Imperial and cities of Brawley, Calexico, Calipatria, El Centro, Holtville, Imperial and Westmorland?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4921, "no_votes": 15318, "total_votes": 20239, "percent_yes": 24.314442413162705, "percent_no": 75.68555758683729, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.351950", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.954607", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Imperial County Ordinance No. 1309, which would impose, for a period not to exceed eight years, a transactions and use tax (I.e. sales tax) of one-half percent (0.5%), upon retail transactions within the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County be adopted and the revenues used for general governmental purposes and distributed amongst the County of Imperial and cities of Brawley, Calexico, Calipatria, El Centro, Holtville, Imperial and Westmorland?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9858, "fingerprint": "2000|200000009|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000009|INYO", "content_hash": "8182795e6523a0b3", "measure_id": "200000009", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  CREATING, ELIMINATING, COMBINING, REORGANIZING COUNTY OFFICES.  INITIATIVE ORDINANCE.  Shall the ordinance which requires voter approval of county ordinances creating, eliminating, combining or otherwise reorganizing offices or departments be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3622, "no_votes": 2174, "total_votes": 5796, "percent_yes": 62.491373360938574, "percent_no": 37.508626639061426, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.352527", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.954991", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  CREATING, ELIMINATING, COMBINING, REORGANIZING COUNTY OFFICES.  INITIATIVE ORDINANCE.  Shall the ordinance which requires voter approval of county ordinances creating, eliminating, combining or otherwise reorganizing offices or departments be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9859, "fingerprint": "2000|200000010|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000010|INYO", "content_hash": "4895342d7c470447", "measure_id": "200000010", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Olancha Community Service District annual appropriations limit be adjusted to $200,000 per year for a period of four (4) years, beginning in fiscal year 2000-2001 and concluding in fiscal year 2003-2004, for necessary operations and improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 81, "no_votes": 14, "total_votes": 95, "percent_yes": 85.26315789473684, "percent_no": 14.736842105263165, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.352797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.955184", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Olancha Community Service District annual appropriations limit be adjusted to $200,000 per year for a period of four (4) years, beginning in fiscal year 2000-2001 and concluding in fiscal year 2003-2004, for necessary operations and improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9862, "fingerprint": "2000|200000346|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000346|INYO", "content_hash": "3f2a7a84d2b82f8b", "measure_id": "200000346", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance allowing bed and breakfast inns in R-1 residential zones under certain conditions be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 853, "no_votes": 395, "total_votes": 1248, "percent_yes": 68.34935897435898, "percent_no": 31.650641025641022, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.353723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.955756", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance allowing bed and breakfast inns in R-1 residential zones under certain conditions be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9861, "fingerprint": "2000|200000176|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000176|INYO", "content_hash": "edb7a0bee9b9188f", "measure_id": "200000176", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make repairs/upgrades and improvements to serve the children from Elm, Pine and Home Street Schools including construction of a new cafeteria/multipurpose building, a new permanent classroom building on the Home Street Middle School campus, general renovation of all schools, installation of the wires and cabling needed to support classroom computers, shall the Bishop Union Elementary School District issue $3,100,000 of bonds at an aggregate interest rate not to exceed 7.5%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2287, "no_votes": 666, "total_votes": 2953, "percent_yes": 77.44666440907551, "percent_no": 22.55333559092449, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.353401", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.955562", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make repairs/upgrades and improvements to serve the children from Elm, Pine and Home Street Schools including construction of a new cafeteria/multipurpose building, a new permanent classroom building on the Home Street Middle School campus, general renovation of all schools, installation of the wires and cabling needed to support classroom computers, shall the Bishop Union Elementary School District issue $3,100,000 of bonds at an aggregate interest rate not to exceed 7.5%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9860, "fingerprint": "2000|200000175|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000175|INYO", "content_hash": "be037e6f827847ca", "measure_id": "200000175", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make repairs/upgrades and improvements to Bishop Union High School including site acquisition for and construction of science classrooms, heating and cooling upgrades, new fire alarm and security systems, wiring and cabling needed to support classroom computers, and general renovation where needed for the campus, shall the Bishop Joint Union High School District issue $4,100,000 of bonds at an aggregate interest rate not to exceed 7.5%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2472, "no_votes": 722, "total_votes": 3194, "percent_yes": 77.39511584220413, "percent_no": 22.604884157795865, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.353068", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.955374", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make repairs/upgrades and improvements to Bishop Union High School including site acquisition for and construction of science classrooms, heating and cooling upgrades, new fire alarm and security systems, wiring and cabling needed to support classroom computers, and general renovation where needed for the campus, shall the Bishop Joint Union High School District issue $4,100,000 of bonds at an aggregate interest rate not to exceed 7.5%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9866, "fingerprint": "2000|200000178|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000178|KERN", "content_hash": "e4b8c13ae00a5329", "measure_id": "200000178", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall ROGER DALE STALNAKER be recalled (removed) from the office of Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56, "no_votes": 24, "total_votes": 80, "percent_yes": 70.0, "percent_no": 30.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.355422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.956922", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ROGER DALE STALNAKER be recalled (removed) from the office of Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12060, "fingerprint": "2000|200000514|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000514|KERN", "content_hash": "bb4c37fceeb0e722", "measure_id": "200000514", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make health and safety improvements at Beardsley Intermediate, Beardsley Junior High, and North Beardsley Elementary, make the District eligible for State matching funds, repair leaky roofs, upgrade science labs, install security alarms for student safety, repair broken sewers, improve air conditioning systems, remove asbestos, and repair, rehabilitate, acquire, and construct classrooms and related property, shall the Beardsley Elementary School District issue $8 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2623, "no_votes": 936, "total_votes": 3559, "percent_yes": 73.70047766226469, "percent_no": 26.29952233773531, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.184620", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.357752", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.958578", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make health and safety improvements at Beardsley Intermediate, Beardsley Junior High, and North Beardsley Elementary, make the District eligible for State matching funds, repair leaky roofs, upgrade science labs, install security alarms for student safety, repair broken sewers, improve air conditioning systems, remove asbestos, and repair, rehabilitate, acquire, and construct classrooms and related property, shall the Beardsley Elementary School District issue $8 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12058, "fingerprint": "2000|200000187|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000187|KERN", "content_hash": "1ef887e2f1453939", "measure_id": "200000187", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, reduce overcrowding at existing schools, repair and upgrade classrooms, improve ventilation, lighting, electrical and plumbing systems, construct required school facilities, and make the District eligible to receive over $5 million in State-matching funds, shall the Fairfax School District be authorized to issue $4,260,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 483, "no_votes": 124, "total_votes": 607, "percent_yes": 79.57166392092257, "percent_no": 20.428336079077425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.182567", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.355763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.957111", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, reduce overcrowding at existing schools, repair and upgrade classrooms, improve ventilation, lighting, electrical and plumbing systems, construct required school facilities, and make the District eligible to receive over $5 million in State-matching funds, shall the Fairfax School District be authorized to issue $4,260,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12057, "fingerprint": "2000|200000177|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000177|KERN", "content_hash": "ee8ed97bca2c7695", "measure_id": "200000177", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of Belridge School District, including replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating/ventilation systems, replacing fire alarms and hydrants, plumbing, playground and athletic facilities, eliminating hazards from earthquakes, upgrading wiring for emergency communication and technology, replacing, constructing, renovating and upgrading classrooms and other school buildings and facilities, and not for salaries or other administrative costs, shall Belridge School District issue $29,300,000 of bonds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10, "no_votes": 36, "total_votes": 46, "percent_yes": 21.7391304347826, "percent_no": 78.2608695652174, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.182024", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.355154", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.956729", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of Belridge School District, including replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating/ventilation systems, replacing fire alarms and hydrants, plumbing, playground and athletic facilities, eliminating hazards from earthquakes, upgrading wiring for emergency communication and technology, replacing, constructing, renovating and upgrading classrooms and other school buildings and facilities, and not for salaries or other administrative costs, shall Belridge School District issue $29,300,000 of bonds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9863, "fingerprint": "2000|200000048|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000048|KERN", "content_hash": "7288919dd9208ac4", "measure_id": "200000048", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Palm Area remain a part of the City of Bakersfield?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 215, "no_votes": 462, "total_votes": 677, "percent_yes": 31.75775480059084, "percent_no": 68.24224519940915, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.353991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.955949", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Palm Area remain a part of the City of Bakersfield?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12061, "fingerprint": "2000|200000515|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000515|KERN", "content_hash": "9a228bb24b08cc48", "measure_id": "200000515", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build permanent classrooms, make the District eligible for State matching funds, upgrade classroom electrical systems for computers and modern technology, construct and acquire new elementary and middle schools, make health and safety improvements at every school, build new classrooms for class-size reduction, and repair and upgrade classrooms and facilities at every elementary and middle school in the District, shall the Delano Union Elementary School District issue $45 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4268, "no_votes": 1016, "total_votes": 5284, "percent_yes": 80.77214231642695, "percent_no": 19.22785768357305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.184899", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.358124", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.958773", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build permanent classrooms, make the District eligible for State matching funds, upgrade classroom electrical systems for computers and modern technology, construct and acquire new elementary and middle schools, make health and safety improvements at every school, build new classrooms for class-size reduction, and repair and upgrade classrooms and facilities at every elementary and middle school in the District, shall the Delano Union Elementary School District issue $45 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12056, "fingerprint": "2000|200000173|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000173|KERN", "content_hash": "b028aeee9fb56cea", "measure_id": "200000173", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Stallion Springs Community Services District levy a special tax of $100, per parcel, per year for necessary police protection expenses, including police protection personnel salaries and police protection equipment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 321, "no_votes": 268, "total_votes": 589, "percent_yes": 54.49915110356537, "percent_no": 45.50084889643463, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.181751", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.354874", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.956529", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Stallion Springs Community Services District levy a special tax of $100, per parcel, per year for necessary police protection expenses, including police protection personnel salaries and police protection equipment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9864, "fingerprint": "2000|200000049|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000049|KERN", "content_hash": "c20b9bdd9bf3afe6", "measure_id": "200000049", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Olive Area remain a part of the City of Bakersfield?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 336, "no_votes": 789, "total_votes": 1125, "percent_yes": 29.86666666666667, "percent_no": 70.13333333333333, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.354296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.956142", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Olive Area remain a part of the City of Bakersfield?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12059, "fingerprint": "2000|200000349|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000349|KERN", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "200000349", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 970, "no_votes": 1143, "total_votes": 2113, "percent_yes": 45.90629436819687, "percent_no": 54.09370563180313, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.183717", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.356851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.957994", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9865, "fingerprint": "2000|200000050|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000050|KERN", "content_hash": "897044388140dc54", "measure_id": "200000050", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section (195) 13 be modified to make it consistent with Section (185) 3 of the Charter to provide that any Deputy Chief shall assume the charge of the Fire Department in the case of absence, disability or death of the Chief of the Fire Department?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32905, "no_votes": 4506, "total_votes": 37411, "percent_yes": 87.9554141829943, "percent_no": 12.044585817005697, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.354597", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.956335", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section (195) 13 be modified to make it consistent with Section (185) 3 of the Charter to provide that any Deputy Chief shall assume the charge of the Fire Department in the case of absence, disability or death of the Chief of the Fire Department?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9870, "fingerprint": "2000|200000350|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000350|KERN", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "200000350", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 889, "no_votes": 1173, "total_votes": 2062, "percent_yes": 43.11348205625606, "percent_no": 56.88651794374394, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.357213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.958190", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9871, "fingerprint": "2000|200000351|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000351|KERN", "content_hash": "bfa5ab31f5f56a29", "measure_id": "200000351", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the transient occupancy tax imposed on hotels, motels, and other lodging places and collected from the persons renting rooms be increased from 8% to 12%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 907, "no_votes": 1117, "total_votes": 2024, "percent_yes": 44.81225296442688, "percent_no": 55.18774703557312, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.357479", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.958387", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the transient occupancy tax imposed on hotels, motels, and other lodging places and collected from the persons renting rooms be increased from 8% to 12%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9867, "fingerprint": "2000|200000240|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000240|KERN", "content_hash": "29a87aec41492fde", "measure_id": "200000240", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Stallion Springs Community Services District Ordinance #115, levying a special tax in the amount of $50 per parcel per year for improved properties and $25 per parcel per year for unimproved properties for police protection services and increasing the Stallion Springs Community Services District appropriation limits set in accordance with Article XIII B of the California Constitution by the authorized amount of the special tax, be approved and become effective?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 517, "no_votes": 285, "total_votes": 802, "percent_yes": 64.46384039900249, "percent_no": 35.53615960099751, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.356047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.957394", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Stallion Springs Community Services District Ordinance #115, levying a special tax in the amount of $50 per parcel per year for improved properties and $25 per parcel per year for unimproved properties for police protection services and increasing the Stallion Springs Community Services District appropriation limits set in accordance with Article XIII B of the California Constitution by the authorized amount of the special tax, be approved and become effective?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9868, "fingerprint": "2000|200000347|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000347|KERN", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200000347", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 128, "no_votes": 206, "total_votes": 334, "percent_yes": 38.32335329341317, "percent_no": 61.67664670658683, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.356321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.957604", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9869, "fingerprint": "2000|200000348|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000348|KERN", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "200000348", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 116, "no_votes": 215, "total_votes": 331, "percent_yes": 35.04531722054381, "percent_no": 64.95468277945619, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.356584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.957800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12062, "fingerprint": "2000|200000352|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000352|KINGS", "content_hash": "5020902d852ec923", "measure_id": "200000352", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 3 - 6.03 of the City of Avenal Municipal Code be amended to Increase the transient occupancy tax from six percent (6%) to ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 301, "no_votes": 459, "total_votes": 760, "percent_yes": 39.60526315789474, "percent_no": 60.39473684210526, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.186103", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.359351", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.959556", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 3 - 6.03 of the City of Avenal Municipal Code be amended to Increase the transient occupancy tax from six percent (6%) to ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9874, "fingerprint": "2000|200000171|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000171|KINGS", "content_hash": "b4679002d6b7a7eb", "measure_id": "200000171", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Laton Joint Unified School District repair and modernize its thirty to fifty year old schools, upgrade deteriorating plumbing, heating, cooling, ventilation and improve electrical systems to meet current technology needs, renovate classrooms, construct a multi-use room, kitchen and bathrooms to improve current safety conditions, with annual audits and no money for staff salaries, by issuing $2.25 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 43, "percent_yes": 37.20930232558139, "percent_no": 62.79069767441861, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.359085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.959362", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Laton Joint Unified School District repair and modernize its thirty to fifty year old schools, upgrade deteriorating plumbing, heating, cooling, ventilation and improve electrical systems to meet current technology needs, renovate classrooms, construct a multi-use room, kitchen and bathrooms to improve current safety conditions, with annual audits and no money for staff salaries, by issuing $2.25 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9872, "fingerprint": "2000|200000051|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000051|KINGS", "content_hash": "107d1bb274d95797", "measure_id": "200000051", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Lemoore become a Charter City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2326, "no_votes": 1051, "total_votes": 3377, "percent_yes": 68.8777021024578, "percent_no": 31.122297897542197, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.358495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.958969", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Lemoore become a Charter City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9873, "fingerprint": "2000|200000120|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000120|KINGS", "content_hash": "fe72cc2086e4672a", "measure_id": "200000120", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9336, "no_votes": 4855, "total_votes": 14191, "percent_yes": 65.78817560425621, "percent_no": 34.21182439574379, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.358813", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.959165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9875, "fingerprint": "2000|200000516|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000516|KINGS", "content_hash": "fe72cc2086e4672a", "measure_id": "200000516", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12602, "no_votes": 6365, "total_votes": 18967, "percent_yes": 66.44171455686192, "percent_no": 33.558285443138075, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.359626", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.959751", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9881, "fingerprint": "2000|200000517|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000517|LASSEN", "content_hash": "0f1ad1e909a1bf8a", "measure_id": "200000517", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall CHERYL ROLAND be recalled (removed) from the office of Board of Trustee, Fort Sage Unified School District, Trustee Area No. 1?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 485, "no_votes": 244, "total_votes": 729, "percent_yes": 66.52949245541838, "percent_no": 33.47050754458162, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.361496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.960909", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall CHERYL ROLAND be recalled (removed) from the office of Board of Trustee, Fort Sage Unified School District, Trustee Area No. 1?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9882, "fingerprint": "2000|200000518|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000518|LASSEN", "content_hash": "875987e9a756bf4b", "measure_id": "200000518", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall RAE LYNNE LEONARD be recalled (removed) from the office of Board of Trustee, Fort Sage Unified School District, Trustee Area No. 2?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 480, "no_votes": 242, "total_votes": 722, "percent_yes": 66.4819944598338, "percent_no": 33.5180055401662, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.361805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.961099", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall RAE LYNNE LEONARD be recalled (removed) from the office of Board of Trustee, Fort Sage Unified School District, Trustee Area No. 2?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9876, "fingerprint": "2000|200000011|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000011|LASSEN", "content_hash": "6cb72124dd21a6b0", "measure_id": "200000011", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Should the Federal Bureau of Prisons build a Federal Correctional facility (prison) at Herlong, designed to house approximately 1000 medium or high security inmates, together with a minimum security satellite prison camp to house an additional 150-300 inmates, as described in the June, 1999 Summary Description prepared by the Federal Bureau of Prisons?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4242, "no_votes": 4094, "total_votes": 8336, "percent_yes": 50.88771593090211, "percent_no": 49.11228406909789, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.359897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.959948", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Should the Federal Bureau of Prisons build a Federal Correctional facility (prison) at Herlong, designed to house approximately 1000 medium or high security inmates, together with a minimum security satellite prison camp to house an additional 150-300 inmates, as described in the June, 1999 Summary Description prepared by the Federal Bureau of Prisons?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9877, "fingerprint": "2000|200000121|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000121|LASSEN", "content_hash": "f11911f840bb0df5", "measure_id": "200000121", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to qualify to receive a grant of up to $11 million of State bond funds; reduce student overcrowding; provide students with access to classroom computers and science technology; build permanent classrooms; repair and upgrade Lassen High School; and acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities; shall the Lassen Union High School District be authorized to issue $3.3 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4054, "no_votes": 2490, "total_votes": 6544, "percent_yes": 61.94987775061125, "percent_no": 38.05012224938875, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.360240", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.960141", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to qualify to receive a grant of up to $11 million of State bond funds; reduce student overcrowding; provide students with access to classroom computers and science technology; build permanent classrooms; repair and upgrade Lassen High School; and acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities; shall the Lassen Union High School District be authorized to issue $3.3 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9878, "fingerprint": "2000|200000241|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000241|LASSEN", "content_hash": "d8081b5a6491e557", "measure_id": "200000241", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Westwood Community Services District levy a special tax on each parcel of real property located within the boundaries of the District in an amount not to exceed $32.00 per year for the purpose of funding fire protection and prevention services in accordance with Section 53978 of the Government Code to be collected in the manner authorized by Division 1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 427, "no_votes": 375, "total_votes": 802, "percent_yes": 53.241895261845386, "percent_no": 46.758104738154614, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.360677", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.960335", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Westwood Community Services District levy a special tax on each parcel of real property located within the boundaries of the District in an amount not to exceed $32.00 per year for the purpose of funding fire protection and prevention services in accordance with Section 53978 of the Government Code to be collected in the manner authorized by Division 1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9879, "fingerprint": "2000|200000242|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000242|LASSEN", "content_hash": "16765f404764b9a4", "measure_id": "200000242", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE) A measure to amend Lassen County's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and the Westwood Area Plan to provide for development of a four-season mountain resort community at Dyer Mountain.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6496, "no_votes": 3870, "total_votes": 10366, "percent_yes": 62.66640941539649, "percent_no": 37.33359058460351, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.360954", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.960525", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) A measure to amend Lassen County's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and the Westwood Area Plan to provide for development of a four-season mountain resort community at Dyer Mountain.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9880, "fingerprint": "2000|200000353|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000353|LASSEN", "content_hash": "b68268a503eef599", "measure_id": "200000353", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance stating that the City of Susanville be prohibited from acquiring, constructing, owning, operating, controlling and/or using a natural gas transmittal/supply system within or outside of the City of Susanville be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1422, "no_votes": 1815, "total_votes": 3237, "percent_yes": 43.92956441149212, "percent_no": 56.07043558850788, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.361228", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.960718", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE) Shall the ordinance stating that the City of Susanville be prohibited from acquiring, constructing, owning, operating, controlling and/or using a natural gas transmittal/supply system within or outside of the City of Susanville be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12069, "fingerprint": "2000|200000243|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000243|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "acdd4cd2b984736b", "measure_id": "200000243", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  INCREASE IN NUMBER OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS.  Shall the Board of Supervisors be increased from five to nine members as detailed in the ordinance adopting the proposed charter amendment.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 851356, "no_votes": 1522794, "total_votes": 2374150, "percent_yes": 35.859402312406544, "percent_no": 64.14059768759346, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.193840", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.368498", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.964969", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  INCREASE IN NUMBER OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS.  Shall the Board of Supervisors be increased from five to nine members as detailed in the ordinance adopting the proposed charter amendment.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12065, "fingerprint": "2000|200000196|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000196|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bc4c7fac7decc02c", "measure_id": "200000196", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To bring all Hacienda La Puente Unified School District schools into compliance with current building safety/health codes, repair/renovate school facilties, build needed classrooms, libraries and science labs, by funding projects described in the District's bond plan, including asbestos removal, ventilation and fire alarm systems upgrades, and installation of wiring for technology in classrooms and libraries, shall Hacienda La Puente Unified School District issue $100,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with annual audits, and qualify for $56,000,000 in state grants?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5758, "no_votes": 1473, "total_votes": 7231, "percent_yes": 79.629373530632, "percent_no": 20.370626469368005, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.192262", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.366649", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.963793", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To bring all Hacienda La Puente Unified School District schools into compliance with current building safety/health codes, repair/renovate school facilties, build needed classrooms, libraries and science labs, by funding projects described in the District's bond plan, including asbestos removal, ventilation and fire alarm systems upgrades, and installation of wiring for technology in classrooms and libraries, shall Hacienda La Puente Unified School District issue $100,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with annual audits, and qualify for $56,000,000 in state grants?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9883, "fingerprint": "2000|200000012|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000012|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bede5a4be6654d28", "measure_id": "200000012", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  Shall the positions of Chief Deputies, and of assistants or deputies next in line of authority to Chief Deputies, be removed from the County's Civil Service System and placed in the unclassified service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 697963, "no_votes": 683764, "total_votes": 1381727, "percent_yes": 50.513813510194126, "percent_no": 49.486186489805874, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.362075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.961287", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  Shall the positions of Chief Deputies, and of assistants or deputies next in line of authority to Chief Deputies, be removed from the County's Civil Service System and placed in the unclassified service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12074, "fingerprint": "2000|200000367|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000367|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5d47b35a31dcdcb0", "measure_id": "200000367", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to increase the size of the Board of Education from five (5) to seven (7) members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36610, "no_votes": 30900, "total_votes": 67510, "percent_yes": 54.22900311065028, "percent_no": 45.77099688934972, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.196910", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.372600", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.967671", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to increase the size of the Board of Education from five (5) to seven (7) members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9889, "fingerprint": "2000|200000126|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000126|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6128f7b0916dff06", "measure_id": "200000126", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classroom electrical systems for computers and modern technology, make the District eligible for State matching funds, build new science labs throughout the District, repair inadequate heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, build new classrooms for class size reduction, upgrade library/media centers, and repair and upgrade classrooms and facilities at every school in the District, shall the Walnut Valley Unified School District issue $50 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8640, "no_votes": 3468, "total_votes": 12108, "percent_yes": 71.35777998017839, "percent_no": 28.642220019821607, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.365060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.962633", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classroom electrical systems for computers and modern technology, make the District eligible for State matching funds, build new science labs throughout the District, repair inadequate heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, build new classrooms for class size reduction, upgrade library/media centers, and repair and upgrade classrooms and facilities at every school in the District, shall the Walnut Valley Unified School District issue $50 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12070, "fingerprint": "2000|200000354|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000354|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "67c08149420c3400", "measure_id": "200000354", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall proposed Section 11-112 be added to the Burbank Municipal Code?  This Section would require prior voter approval of any discretionary act of the City or agreement between the City and the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority for a relocated or expanded airport terminal project in order for such act or agreement to be valid and effective.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28368, "no_votes": 6980, "total_votes": 35348, "percent_yes": 80.25347968767682, "percent_no": 19.746520312323184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.194072", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.368782", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.965160", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall proposed Section 11-112 be added to the Burbank Municipal Code?  This Section would require prior voter approval of any discretionary act of the City or agreement between the City and the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority for a relocated or expanded airport terminal project in order for such act or agreement to be valid and effective.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9884, "fingerprint": "2000|200000052|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000052|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "db67b656c5477dab", "measure_id": "200000052", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be changed from two years to four years commencing with the regular municipal election in 2001?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9014, "no_votes": 8142, "total_votes": 17156, "percent_yes": 52.54138493821403, "percent_no": 47.45861506178597, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.362440", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.961483", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be changed from two years to four years commencing with the regular municipal election in 2001?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9904, "fingerprint": "2000|200000368|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000368|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9a384e823499a1f6", "measure_id": "200000368", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to provide for the nomination and election of members of the Board of Education by geographic sub-districts, effective upon the enactment of enabling legislation by the State, with geographic sub-districts to be drawn after each federal census by a commission composed of members appointed by the Cities of Pasadena and Sierra Madre, the Board of Education and the County Supervisor representing the area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30513, "no_votes": 32315, "total_votes": 62828, "percent_yes": 48.56592602024575, "percent_no": 51.43407397975425, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.372888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.967863", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to provide for the nomination and election of members of the Board of Education by geographic sub-districts, effective upon the enactment of enabling legislation by the State, with geographic sub-districts to be drawn after each federal census by a commission composed of members appointed by the Cities of Pasadena and Sierra Madre, the Board of Education and the County Supervisor representing the area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12076, "fingerprint": "2000|200000519|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000519|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "09b8d903664b7146", "measure_id": "200000519", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety and education in neighborhood schools by repairing aging school facilities replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical systems, upgrading deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems, renovating student restrooms, repairing aging roofs, modernizing classrooms, science labs, and libraries, shall Charter Oak Unified School District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, appoint a citizens' oversight committee to ensure funds are spent only on school improvements, not for administrators' salaries, with all the money raised benefiting local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9543, "no_votes": 3508, "total_votes": 13051, "percent_yes": 73.12083365259367, "percent_no": 26.879166347406326, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.199830", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.376463", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.970179", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety and education in neighborhood schools by repairing aging school facilities replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical systems, upgrading deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems, renovating student restrooms, repairing aging roofs, modernizing classrooms, science labs, and libraries, shall Charter Oak Unified School District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, appoint a citizens' oversight committee to ensure funds are spent only on school improvements, not for administrators' salaries, with all the money raised benefiting local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9886, "fingerprint": "2000|200000122|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000122|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bc545c02bc1197c9", "measure_id": "200000122", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade every school in the Centinela Valley Union High School District, rewire classrooms for computers, make the district eligible for State matching funds, repair older classroom electrical systems, provide handicapped access, replace broken plumbing, gas and heating systems, repair leaky roofs, and build new classrooms, shall the District issue $59 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as no money is spent on administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12632, "no_votes": 4712, "total_votes": 17344, "percent_yes": 72.83210332103322, "percent_no": 27.167896678966784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.363561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.961865", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade every school in the Centinela Valley Union High School District, rewire classrooms for computers, make the district eligible for State matching funds, repair older classroom electrical systems, provide handicapped access, replace broken plumbing, gas and heating systems, repair leaky roofs, and build new classrooms, shall the District issue $59 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as no money is spent on administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9905, "fingerprint": "2000|200000369|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000369|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c00468d800c0cd79", "measure_id": "200000369", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to require that the President of the Board of Education address the people each September on the state of the Pasadena Unified School District to articulate its goals and objectives for the school year and to report on the progress of the District in achieving its prior goals and objectives, including the financial state of the schools?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56811, "no_votes": 9410, "total_votes": 66221, "percent_yes": 85.79000619138944, "percent_no": 14.209993808610562, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.373172", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.968053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to require that the President of the Board of Education address the people each September on the state of the Pasadena Unified School District to articulate its goals and objectives for the school year and to report on the progress of the District in achieving its prior goals and objectives, including the financial state of the schools?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12071, "fingerprint": "2000|200000355|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000355|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "80766da164b82861", "measure_id": "200000355", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that replaces the current business license fee of $9 per year on shuttle service parking stalls with a special 10% tax on gross receipts on all parking, except employee parking, retail, hotel, restaurant, theater and validated parking for purposes of providing revenues for police and fire services and public road improvements.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4394, "no_votes": 2485, "total_votes": 6879, "percent_yes": 63.87556330862044, "percent_no": 36.12443669137956, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.194405", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.369054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.965355", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted that replaces the current business license fee of $9 per year on shuttle service parking stalls with a special 10% tax on gross receipts on all parking, except employee parking, retail, hotel, restaurant, theater and validated parking for purposes of providing revenues for police and fire services and public road improvements.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9885, "fingerprint": "2000|200000053|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000053|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "801b9a684c4892dc", "measure_id": "200000053", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Glendora Commerical Specific Plan and related zone change be adopted for the Glendora Marketplace Project, allowing up to 474,000 square feet of retail and commerical space to be developed on the vacant 48 acres at the northwest corner of Lone Hill Avenue and Gladstone Street?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10373, "no_votes": 5982, "total_votes": 16355, "percent_yes": 63.42402934882298, "percent_no": 36.57597065117702, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.362944", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.961675", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Glendora Commerical Specific Plan and related zone change be adopted for the Glendora Marketplace Project, allowing up to 474,000 square feet of retail and commerical space to be developed on the vacant 48 acres at the northwest corner of Lone Hill Avenue and Gladstone Street?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9917, "fingerprint": "2000|200000524|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000524|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "055aeddb43003f87", "measure_id": "200000524", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the voters of the Pasadena Unified School District adopt the Reform Plan of the Charter Reform Task Force as a blueprint for the schools and, consistent with its terms, call upon the Board of Education to provide an accounting, within six months, of the Plan's implementation and direct the City Council to reconvene the Task Force within one year to assess the progress of the Plan's implementation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45771, "no_votes": 15090, "total_votes": 60861, "percent_yes": 75.20579681569478, "percent_no": 24.794203184305218, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.378021", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.971134", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the voters of the Pasadena Unified School District adopt the Reform Plan of the Charter Reform Task Force as a blueprint for the schools and, consistent with its terms, call upon the Board of Education to provide an accounting, within six months, of the Plan's implementation and direct the City Council to reconvene the Task Force within one year to assess the progress of the Plan's implementation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12079, "fingerprint": "2000|200000525|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000525|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "68548f7324c63e98", "measure_id": "200000525", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct earthquake safety improvements throughout the Redondo Beach Unified School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, repair deteriorating sewer, gas and plumbing systems, upgrade classroom smoke/fire alarms and electrical systems, build new classrooms for class size reduction, upgrade science labs, provide students with increased computer access, and repair, rehabilitate, acquire and construct classrooms and property throughout the DIstrict, shall the District issue $52 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19583, "no_votes": 6375, "total_votes": 25958, "percent_yes": 75.44109715694583, "percent_no": 24.55890284305417, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.201271", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.378288", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.971324", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct earthquake safety improvements throughout the Redondo Beach Unified School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, repair deteriorating sewer, gas and plumbing systems, upgrade classroom smoke/fire alarms and electrical systems, build new classrooms for class size reduction, upgrade science labs, provide students with increased computer access, and repair, rehabilitate, acquire and construct classrooms and property throughout the DIstrict, shall the District issue $52 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12068, "fingerprint": "2000|200000214|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000214|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b40603102faded46", "measure_id": "200000214", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the San Marino Unified School District be authorized to finance the repair, renovation and construction of District facilities, including safety and seismic upgrades, and repair roofs, plumbing, sewer, lighting, and electrical systems; construct and renovate classrooms; and repair, upgrade kitchens, cafeterias, auditoriums and libraries by issuing general obligation bonds in the maximum principal amount of $18 million with interest rates not to exceed the maximum set by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2471, "no_votes": 1025, "total_votes": 3496, "percent_yes": 70.68077803203661, "percent_no": 29.319221967963387, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-20", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.193640", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.368223", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.964768", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Marino Unified School District be authorized to finance the repair, renovation and construction of District facilities, including safety and seismic upgrades, and repair roofs, plumbing, sewer, lighting, and electrical systems; construct and renovate classrooms; and repair, upgrade kitchens, cafeterias, auditoriums and libraries by issuing general obligation bonds in the maximum principal amount of $18 million with interest rates not to exceed the maximum set by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12067, "fingerprint": "2000|200000200|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000200|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "51a920fba4d666db", "measure_id": "200000200", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide students with facilities required to meet the technology needs and challenges of the twenty-first century, shall the Wiseburn School District be authorized to construct, acquire and improve school facilities, including a new Dana School and a new Cabrillo Elementary School to replace the existing 50 - 75 year old facilities and to issue $35,000,000 of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1199, "no_votes": 383, "total_votes": 1582, "percent_yes": 75.79013906447535, "percent_no": 24.209860935524645, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.193442", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.367864", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.964576", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide students with facilities required to meet the technology needs and challenges of the twenty-first century, shall the Wiseburn School District be authorized to construct, acquire and improve school facilities, including a new Dana School and a new Cabrillo Elementary School to replace the existing 50 - 75 year old facilities and to issue $35,000,000 of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12063, "fingerprint": "2000|200000125|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000125|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1a706648c6794f5a", "measure_id": "200000125", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Pasadena Unified School District and the La Canada Unified School District be reorganized by transferring territory, as specified, from the Pasadena Unified School District to the La Canada Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 13, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.190609", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.364650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.962438", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pasadena Unified School District and the La Canada Unified School District be reorganized by transferring territory, as specified, from the Pasadena Unified School District to the La Canada Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9887, "fingerprint": "2000|200000123|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000123|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "1a706648c6794f5a", "measure_id": "200000123", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Pasadena Unified School District and the La Canada Unified School District be reorganized by transferring territory, as specified, from the Pasadena Unified School District to the La Canada Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 13, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.363900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.962057", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pasadena Unified School District and the La Canada Unified School District be reorganized by transferring territory, as specified, from the Pasadena Unified School District to the La Canada Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9906, "fingerprint": "2000|200000370|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000370|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "17aad74ebb57fb99", "measure_id": "200000370", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to permit an active or retired member of the Fire and Police Retirement System to seek election as a member of the Fire and Police Retirement Board?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29809, "no_votes": 10886, "total_votes": 40695, "percent_yes": 73.2497849858705, "percent_no": 26.750215014129495, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.373442", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.968241", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to permit an active or retired member of the Fire and Police Retirement System to seek election as a member of the Fire and Police Retirement Board?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9899, "fingerprint": "2000|200000362|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000362|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dc60a751e205fbd5", "measure_id": "200000362", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "FIRE/PARAMEDIC, EMERGENCY HELICOPTER, ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITIES PUBLIC SAFETY GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS.  To protect public health/safety, improve paramedic/firefighting response time, replace deteriorating facilities, build 19 earthquake safe neighborhood fire/paramedic stations, a fire/paramedic/emergency City helicopter center; 5 new and 3 expanded/repaired animal shelters replacing overcrowded, unsafe shelters; provide annual audits and no monies for administrators' salaries; establish Citizens Oversight Committees; shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness totaling $532,648,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 664200, "no_votes": 214892, "total_votes": 879092, "percent_yes": 75.55523198937085, "percent_no": 24.444768010629147, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.371060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.966717", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FIRE/PARAMEDIC, EMERGENCY HELICOPTER, ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITIES PUBLIC SAFETY GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS.  To protect public health/safety, improve paramedic/firefighting response time, replace deteriorating facilities, build 19 earthquake safe neighborhood fire/paramedic stations, a fire/paramedic/emergency City helicopter center; 5 new and 3 expanded/repaired animal shelters replacing overcrowded, unsafe shelters; provide annual audits and no monies for administrators' salaries; establish Citizens Oversight Committees; shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness totaling $532,648,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9907, "fingerprint": "2000|200000371|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000371|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b7f7e18b3e3ffaeb", "measure_id": "200000371", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to permit retired members of the Fire and Police Retirement System to work for the City as a volunteer on City boards, commissions and committees, as an elective officer, and on a temporary basis for up to 960 hours per calendar year, performing duties in which they have specialized skills?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32836, "no_votes": 8086, "total_votes": 40922, "percent_yes": 80.24045745564733, "percent_no": 19.75954254435267, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.373819", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.968430", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to permit retired members of the Fire and Police Retirement System to work for the City as a volunteer on City boards, commissions and committees, as an elective officer, and on a temporary basis for up to 960 hours per calendar year, performing duties in which they have specialized skills?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12077, "fingerprint": "2000|200000520|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000520|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0c2857da788d6a71", "measure_id": "200000520", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair all of the district's aging schools, and qualify for State matching funds, shall the Garvey School District issue $15 million in bonds, at legal rates, to replace deteriorating roofs, acquire school facilities, upgrade classroom electrical wiring to accommodate modern computer technology, improve student safety by replacing worn plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems and installing security fencing, outdoor lighting and classroom intercom and fire alarm systems, and renovate bathrooms to current standards?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6478, "no_votes": 2180, "total_votes": 8658, "percent_yes": 74.82097482097481, "percent_no": 25.17902517902519, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.200029", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.376765", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.970372", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair all of the district's aging schools, and qualify for State matching funds, shall the Garvey School District issue $15 million in bonds, at legal rates, to replace deteriorating roofs, acquire school facilities, upgrade classroom electrical wiring to accommodate modern computer technology, improve student safety by replacing worn plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems and installing security fencing, outdoor lighting and classroom intercom and fire alarm systems, and renovate bathrooms to current standards?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12064, "fingerprint": "2000|200000195|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000195|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7cde3789b81b02fd", "measure_id": "200000195", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, upgrade and make improvements to all Glendora Unified School District schools and qualify for $22 million in State grants, shall Glendora Unified School District repair/replace aging roofs, provide additional computer and science labs, install wiring for technology, repair and upgrade classrooms, restrooms, ventilation systems, bring schools into compliance with current building safety/health codes, acquire and construct classrooms and school facilities by issuing $21 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4015, "no_votes": 1151, "total_votes": 5166, "percent_yes": 77.71970576848626, "percent_no": 22.280294231513736, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.192003", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.366345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.963563", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, upgrade and make improvements to all Glendora Unified School District schools and qualify for $22 million in State grants, shall Glendora Unified School District repair/replace aging roofs, provide additional computer and science labs, install wiring for technology, repair and upgrade classrooms, restrooms, ventilation systems, bring schools into compliance with current building safety/health codes, acquire and construct classrooms and school facilities by issuing $21 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits and citizen oversight?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9890, "fingerprint": "2000|200000127|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000127|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a404cf4808c0e2bb", "measure_id": "200000127", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To give students access to classroom computers, repair classrooms and educational facilities, make health and safety improvements throughout the District, upgrade smoke and fire alarms, rewire electrical outlets for modern technology and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the West Covina Unified School District issue $40 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent accounting firm?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7927, "no_votes": 3022, "total_votes": 10949, "percent_yes": 72.39930587268245, "percent_no": 27.600694127317553, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.365404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.962891", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To give students access to classroom computers, repair classrooms and educational facilities, make health and safety improvements throughout the District, upgrade smoke and fire alarms, rewire electrical outlets for modern technology and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the West Covina Unified School District issue $40 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent accounting firm?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9908, "fingerprint": "2000|200000372|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000372|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e6578626eb81ec23", "measure_id": "200000372", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to repeal the compulsory service retirement age of those in the Fire and Police Retirement System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24542, "no_votes": 15087, "total_votes": 39629, "percent_yes": 61.92939513992278, "percent_no": 38.07060486007722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.374087", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.968620", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pasadena be amended to repeal the compulsory service retirement age of those in the Fire and Police Retirement System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9895, "fingerprint": "2000|200000356|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000356|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "36b70ca243c72eb2", "measure_id": "200000356", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance permitting an increase of the city of Hawthorne's Transient Occupancy Tax from 8% to 12% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5959, "no_votes": 9537, "total_votes": 15496, "percent_yes": 38.45508518327311, "percent_no": 61.54491481672689, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.369326", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.965552", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance permitting an increase of the city of Hawthorne's Transient Occupancy Tax from 8% to 12% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9912, "fingerprint": "2000|200000377|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000377|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "931990690ffe9ad6", "measure_id": "200000377", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted setting the compensation of the elected City treasurer equal to that received by any elected City Council Member, as set forth by State law, to take effect on March 6, 2001?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7406, "no_votes": 7016, "total_votes": 14422, "percent_yes": 51.352100956871446, "percent_no": 48.647899043128554, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.375548", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.969602", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted setting the compensation of the elected City treasurer equal to that received by any elected City Council Member, as set forth by State law, to take effect on March 6, 2001?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9897, "fingerprint": "2000|200000359|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000359|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c312c42d946cc206", "measure_id": "200000359", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance which reduces the utility users tax by 25% (5% each year for 5 years), be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65876, "no_votes": 44401, "total_votes": 110277, "percent_yes": 59.736844491598426, "percent_no": 40.263155508401574, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.370165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.966140", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance which reduces the utility users tax by 25% (5% each year for 5 years), be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9913, "fingerprint": "2000|200000378|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000378|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9f7d009924c1b7d1", "measure_id": "200000378", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted prohibiting any elected city official from being appointed or obtaining employment or service contracts with the city, or doing business with the city, within 24 months after they leave their elected office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8099, "no_votes": 5610, "total_votes": 13709, "percent_yes": 59.0779779706762, "percent_no": 40.9220220293238, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.375841", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.969796", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted prohibiting any elected city official from being appointed or obtaining employment or service contracts with the city, or doing business with the city, within 24 months after they leave their elected office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9898, "fingerprint": "2000|200000360|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000360|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "679d7a0609778d33", "measure_id": "200000360", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance which reduces the utility users tax by 50% (10% each year for 5 years), be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76637, "no_votes": 33475, "total_votes": 110112, "percent_yes": 69.59913542574833, "percent_no": 30.40086457425167, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.370434", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.966329", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance which reduces the utility users tax by 50% (10% each year for 5 years), be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9914, "fingerprint": "2000|200000379|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000379|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "86c0826532101bc4", "measure_id": "200000379", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Bill De Witt be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9052, "no_votes": 6166, "total_votes": 15218, "percent_yes": 59.48219214088579, "percent_no": 40.51780785911421, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.376190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.969989", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Bill De Witt be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12073, "fingerprint": "2000|200000361|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000361|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c4f0ac9b66de17b5", "measure_id": "200000361", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure K, which amends the Long Beach City Charter provisions for term limitations for the offices of City Council and Mayor by (1) changing the lifetime ban to a ban on 3 consecutive terms and (2) permitting the name of a termed out candidate to be placed upon the ballot if that candidate qualifies for the general election, be ratified?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52161, "no_votes": 55116, "total_votes": 107277, "percent_yes": 48.62272434911491, "percent_no": 51.37727565088509, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.195731", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.370711", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.966524", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure K, which amends the Long Beach City Charter provisions for term limitations for the offices of City Council and Mayor by (1) changing the lifetime ban to a ban on 3 consecutive terms and (2) permitting the name of a termed out candidate to be placed upon the ballot if that candidate qualifies for the general election, be ratified?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12066, "fingerprint": "2000|200000197|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000197|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "19afba373d9d297e", "measure_id": "200000197", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety and educational facilities in our neighborhood schools by repairing and rehabilitating aging schools, including repairing roofs, upgrading fire alarms, replacing inadequate plumbing and sewer systems, upgrading electrical systems to safely accommodate technology, and renovating classrooms and restrooms by funding only the specific projects included in the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District's facilities bond plan, shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District issue $46,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, conduct annual audits, and establish an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9591, "no_votes": 2472, "total_votes": 12063, "percent_yes": 79.50758517781647, "percent_no": 20.492414822183534, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.192523", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.366930", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.963987", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety and educational facilities in our neighborhood schools by repairing and rehabilitating aging schools, including repairing roofs, upgrading fire alarms, replacing inadequate plumbing and sewer systems, upgrading electrical systems to safely accommodate technology, and renovating classrooms and restrooms by funding only the specific projects included in the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District's facilities bond plan, shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District issue $46,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, conduct annual audits, and establish an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9888, "fingerprint": "2000|200000124|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000124|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "39c42a63fd831ea8", "measure_id": "200000124", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions at local elementary and middle schools and to repair and modernize classrooms, including upgrading electrical, plumbing, ventilation and sewer systems; installing modern fire alarm systems and wiring for computer technology; upgrading bathrooms, replacing deteriorating temporary portables and eliminating hazards from asbestos; and to obtain eligibility for matching state funding, shall the Little Lake City School District issue $34,000,000 of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4963, "no_votes": 1566, "total_votes": 6529, "percent_yes": 76.01470362995865, "percent_no": 23.985296370041354, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.364292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.962247", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions at local elementary and middle schools and to repair and modernize classrooms, including upgrading electrical, plumbing, ventilation and sewer systems; installing modern fire alarm systems and wiring for computer technology; upgrading bathrooms, replacing deteriorating temporary portables and eliminating hazards from asbestos; and to obtain eligibility for matching state funding, shall the Little Lake City School District issue $34,000,000 of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9909, "fingerprint": "2000|200000373|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000373|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "70faef1f334fd1e2", "measure_id": "200000373", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to add specified minimum wage and employee benefit requirements for some employees doing work on City contracts and grants and barring the City from establishing, modifying or regulating wage and benefit requirements except by initiative?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7868, "no_votes": 28335, "total_votes": 36203, "percent_yes": 21.733005552026068, "percent_no": 78.26699444797393, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.374353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.968815", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to add specified minimum wage and employee benefit requirements for some employees doing work on City contracts and grants and barring the City from establishing, modifying or regulating wage and benefit requirements except by initiative?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9896, "fingerprint": "2000|200000358|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000358|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0e34db055f5ef98d", "measure_id": "200000358", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 878-00 be adopted increasing the expenditure limit for certain public facility developments as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 2.72?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1722, "no_votes": 2975, "total_votes": 4697, "percent_yes": 36.66169895678092, "percent_no": 63.33830104321908, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.369893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.965948", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 878-00 be adopted increasing the expenditure limit for certain public facility developments as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 2.72?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9910, "fingerprint": "2000|200000374|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000374|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "7b7091998dcf7011", "measure_id": "200000374", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to prohibit any City public official who approves giving a public contract or other benefit to any person from receiving \"personal or campaign advantages\" from that person for up to six years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19468, "no_votes": 13648, "total_votes": 33116, "percent_yes": 58.78729315134677, "percent_no": 41.21270684865323, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.374623", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.969023", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to prohibit any City public official who approves giving a public contract or other benefit to any person from receiving \"personal or campaign advantages\" from that person for up to six years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9916, "fingerprint": "2000|200000523|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000523|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9c6dfecf285670d0", "measure_id": "200000523", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To complete the repair and renovation of Mira Costa High School, including replacing deteriorating electrical, heating and plumbing systems, and comply with current State fire and safety standards, and repair, rehabilitate and construct high school classrooms, library, laboratories and other educational facilities to relive overcrowding, shall the Manhattan Beach Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $26,000,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit with all the money raised thereby staying in Manhattan Beach to benefit local childen?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13066, "no_votes": 5296, "total_votes": 18362, "percent_yes": 71.15782594488618, "percent_no": 28.842174055113816, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.377750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.970944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To complete the repair and renovation of Mira Costa High School, including replacing deteriorating electrical, heating and plumbing systems, and comply with current State fire and safety standards, and repair, rehabilitate and construct high school classrooms, library, laboratories and other educational facilities to relive overcrowding, shall the Manhattan Beach Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $26,000,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit with all the money raised thereby staying in Manhattan Beach to benefit local childen?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9911, "fingerprint": "2000|200000375|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000375|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "fcf630f67a01ad82", "measure_id": "200000375", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended by adding language explicitly exempting civil fines from the $500.00 limit applicable to criminal penalties for Municipal Code violations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16164, "no_votes": 14322, "total_votes": 30486, "percent_yes": 53.02105884668372, "percent_no": 46.97894115331628, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.374902", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.969222", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended by adding language explicitly exempting civil fines from the $500.00 limit applicable to criminal penalties for Municipal Code violations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9900, "fingerprint": "2000|200000363|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000363|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f4b7e88efcc73fd8", "measure_id": "200000363", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 213 be adopted, requiring that any development agreement concerning real property more than 30 acres in size must be approved by both the City Council and the voters of the City of Malibu?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3278, "no_votes": 2930, "total_votes": 6208, "percent_yes": 52.8028350515464, "percent_no": 47.1971649484536, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.371333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.966910", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 213 be adopted, requiring that any development agreement concerning real property more than 30 acres in size must be approved by both the City Council and the voters of the City of Malibu?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9901, "fingerprint": "2000|200000364|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000364|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "46877f2329767c79", "measure_id": "200000364", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  ADVISORY VOTE ONLY.  Do you support the City issuing $15 million in general obligation bonds, to be repaid from proceeds of a property tax surcharge, for the purpose of acquiring private property for city park, recreation and open space purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3440, "no_votes": 2467, "total_votes": 5907, "percent_yes": 58.23599119688505, "percent_no": 41.76400880311495, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.371604", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.967100", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  ADVISORY VOTE ONLY.  Do you support the City issuing $15 million in general obligation bonds, to be repaid from proceeds of a property tax surcharge, for the purpose of acquiring private property for city park, recreation and open space purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9902, "fingerprint": "2000|200000365|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000365|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bd131e2666980cae", "measure_id": "200000365", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the \"Malibu Right to Vote on Development Initiative\" be adopted requiring voter approval of all commercial, industrial and combined commerical and residential development in excess of 25,000 square feet which either (I) requires a variance or conditional use permit, or (II) increases density over current zoning limitations, or (III) permits the construction or widening of any public roadway?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3178, "no_votes": 3172, "total_votes": 6350, "percent_yes": 50.047244094488185, "percent_no": 49.952755905511815, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.372047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.967290", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the \"Malibu Right to Vote on Development Initiative\" be adopted requiring voter approval of all commercial, industrial and combined commerical and residential development in excess of 25,000 square feet which either (I) requires a variance or conditional use permit, or (II) increases density over current zoning limitations, or (III) permits the construction or widening of any public roadway?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12078, "fingerprint": "2000|200000522|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000522|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ea36e80da9f18d6c", "measure_id": "200000522", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Angeles Unified School District and the Las Virgenes Unified School District be reorganized by transferring territory, as specified, from the Los Angeles Unified School District to the Las Virgenes Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 83, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.200475", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.377469", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.970754", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Angeles Unified School District and the Las Virgenes Unified School District be reorganized by transferring territory, as specified, from the Los Angeles Unified School District to the Las Virgenes Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9915, "fingerprint": "2000|200000521|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000521|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ea36e80da9f18d6c", "measure_id": "200000521", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Angeles Unified School District and the Las Virgenes Unified School District be reorganized by transferring territory, as specified, from the Los Angeles Unified School District to the Las Virgenes Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 83, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.377192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.970564", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Angeles Unified School District and the Las Virgenes Unified School District be reorganized by transferring territory, as specified, from the Los Angeles Unified School District to the Las Virgenes Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12072, "fingerprint": "2000|200000357|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000357|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a0989857f6c85607", "measure_id": "200000357", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the \"Agreement between the City of Huntington Park and System Disposal for Refuse Disposal Services for the Residents of the City of Huntington Park\", granting System Disposal a ten year exclusive franchise, commencing on January 1, 2004, to perform solid waste and recyclable materials disposal services for City residents, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3686, "no_votes": 3424, "total_votes": 7110, "percent_yes": 51.84247538677919, "percent_no": 48.15752461322081, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.194901", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.369616", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.965750", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \"Agreement between the City of Huntington Park and System Disposal for Refuse Disposal Services for the Residents of the City of Huntington Park\", granting System Disposal a ten year exclusive franchise, commencing on January 1, 2004, to perform solid waste and recyclable materials disposal services for City residents, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9893, "fingerprint": "2000|200000198|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000198|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "85f11e9cd30a2dc8", "measure_id": "200000198", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make repairs/upgrades and improvements to all Rowland Unified School District schools and bring school buildings into compliance with current earthquake building safety/health codes, to acquire/construct classrooms and school facilities, install wiring for technology in classrooms, libraries, repair/upgrade deteriorating plumbing, repair and add restrooms, install fire alarms, construct science labs, shall Rowland Unified School District issue $70 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits and qualify for $50 million in state grants?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4295, "no_votes": 833, "total_votes": 5128, "percent_yes": 83.75585023400937, "percent_no": 16.244149765990628, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.367201", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.964186", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make repairs/upgrades and improvements to all Rowland Unified School District schools and bring school buildings into compliance with current earthquake building safety/health codes, to acquire/construct classrooms and school facilities, install wiring for technology in classrooms, libraries, repair/upgrade deteriorating plumbing, repair and add restrooms, install fire alarms, construct science labs, shall Rowland Unified School District issue $70 million of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with annual audits and qualify for $50 million in state grants?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9918, "fingerprint": "2000|200000526|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000526|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cc6e81ea5defbf1c", "measure_id": "200000526", "measure_letter": "RR", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make health and safety improvements at every school in the Rosemead School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, upgrade classroom fire and smoke alarm systems, replace leaky roofs, rewire electrical systems to provide students with access to classroom computers, repair broken sewers, remove asbestos, and repair, rehabilitate, acquire and construct classrooms and other property throughout the District, shall the District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4387, "no_votes": 1251, "total_votes": 5638, "percent_yes": 77.811280595956, "percent_no": 22.188719404043994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.378558", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.971516", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make health and safety improvements at every school in the Rosemead School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, upgrade classroom fire and smoke alarm systems, replace leaky roofs, rewire electrical systems to provide students with access to classroom computers, repair broken sewers, remove asbestos, and repair, rehabilitate, acquire and construct classrooms and other property throughout the District, shall the District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12075, "fingerprint": "2000|200000376|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000376|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "34bbe2a3c8aa05b2", "measure_id": "200000376", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Signal Hill become a charter city by adopting a charter to give it full home-rule powers under the State Constitution?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2399, "no_votes": 389, "total_votes": 2788, "percent_yes": 86.04734576757532, "percent_no": 13.952654232424678, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.199037", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.375169", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.969412", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Signal Hill become a charter city by adopting a charter to give it full home-rule powers under the State Constitution?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9894, "fingerprint": "2000|200000199|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000199|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ee24ce8f9c2b66c1", "measure_id": "200000199", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding by constructing and acquiring additional schools, classrooms and facilities and to rehabilitate aging junior high and high schools, including replacement of inadequate lighting, electrical, ventilation, plumbing systems and roofs, renovating classrooms, libraries, and obtain eligibility for State funding for construction and renovation, shall the William S. Hart Union High School District issue $52 million in bonds at interest rates below legal limits and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11359, "no_votes": 5705, "total_votes": 17064, "percent_yes": 66.56704172526958, "percent_no": 33.432958274730424, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.367549", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.964383", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding by constructing and acquiring additional schools, classrooms and facilities and to rehabilitate aging junior high and high schools, including replacement of inadequate lighting, electrical, ventilation, plumbing systems and roofs, renovating classrooms, libraries, and obtain eligibility for State funding for construction and renovation, shall the William S. Hart Union High School District issue $52 million in bonds at interest rates below legal limits and appoint a Citizens Oversight Committee to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9903, "fingerprint": "2000|200000366|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000366|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b019def3838e9ade", "measure_id": "200000366", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. CC-2000-034 be adopted, entitled \"A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palmdale, California approving General Plan Amendment 99-2(A) and 99-2(B) revising the General Plan Land Use Map as described herein\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18029, "no_votes": 9572, "total_votes": 27601, "percent_yes": 65.32009709793122, "percent_no": 34.679902902068775, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.372331", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.967479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. CC-2000-034 be adopted, entitled \"A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palmdale, California approving General Plan Amendment 99-2(A) and 99-2(B) revising the General Plan Land Use Map as described herein\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9891, "fingerprint": "2000|200000128|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000128|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "270f4a18d5bce0fc", "measure_id": "200000128", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To make health and safety improvements throughout the Whittier City School District, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, repair classrooms and facilities throughout the District, upgrade fire and burglar alarms, build cafeterias, give students access to classroom computers, and make the District eligible for State matching funds, shall the District issue $30 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate so long as spending in annually reviewed by an independent accounting firm?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9227, "no_votes": 3672, "total_votes": 12899, "percent_yes": 71.53267695170167, "percent_no": 28.467323048298326, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.365750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.963163", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To make health and safety improvements throughout the Whittier City School District, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, repair classrooms and facilities throughout the District, upgrade fire and burglar alarms, build cafeterias, give students access to classroom computers, and make the District eligible for State matching funds, shall the District issue $30 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate so long as spending in annually reviewed by an independent accounting firm?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12080, "fingerprint": "2000|200000527|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000527|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "24af655d7a6dc5a2", "measure_id": "200000527", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue special programs to attract outstanding teachers and improve instruction and counseling, to enhance athletic, music, and arts programs, and to purchase science materials and computer technology for schools, shall the Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District be authorized to continue a special tax limited to $98 per parcel, adjusted annually in accordance with the Consumer Price Index Urban (CPI U) for no longer than ten years, which will help protect the taxpayers' investment in education and a safe learning environment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32934, "no_votes": 8639, "total_votes": 41573, "percent_yes": 79.21968585379933, "percent_no": 20.780314146200666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.201913", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.379046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.971737", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue special programs to attract outstanding teachers and improve instruction and counseling, to enhance athletic, music, and arts programs, and to purchase science materials and computer technology for schools, shall the Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District be authorized to continue a special tax limited to $98 per parcel, adjusted annually in accordance with the Consumer Price Index Urban (CPI U) for no longer than ten years, which will help protect the taxpayers' investment in education and a safe learning environment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9892, "fingerprint": "2000|200000194|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000194|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9aeba7107c1129d4", "measure_id": "200000194", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Claremont Unified School District protect its valuable community assets; repair/rehabilitate each school to meet current health, safety, accessability/instructional standards; replace aging roofs/deteriorated plumbing; rewire classrooms to access modern computer technology; renovate school facilities/sites, laboratories/restrooms; acquire and construct classrooms and facilities; and construct an additional elementary school for growth, by issuing $48,910,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits of expenditures and no proceeds used for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4660, "no_votes": 2108, "total_votes": 6768, "percent_yes": 68.85342789598108, "percent_no": 31.146572104018915, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.366071", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.963364", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Claremont Unified School District protect its valuable community assets; repair/rehabilitate each school to meet current health, safety, accessability/instructional standards; replace aging roofs/deteriorated plumbing; rewire classrooms to access modern computer technology; renovate school facilities/sites, laboratories/restrooms; acquire and construct classrooms and facilities; and construct an additional elementary school for growth, by issuing $48,910,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits of expenditures and no proceeds used for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9919, "fingerprint": "2000|200000201|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000201|MADERA", "content_hash": "9975c1565fd6e252", "measure_id": "200000201", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Growth and development within the Madera Unified School District boundaries has significantly impacted our schools, especially the high school. With bond proceeds and other state and local resources combined, the community can complete three projects: establish the Madera High School South Campus as a separate high school; refurbish and upgrade the Madera High School North Campus; and aquire a site and construct an elementary. Therefore, shall the Madera Unified School District Community Facilites District No. 1999-1 levy special taxes in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax approved by the Board of Trustees on February 8, 2000; establish an appropriations limit in accordance therewith; and incur a bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $40,000,000 at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2662, "no_votes": 1929, "total_votes": 4591, "percent_yes": 57.98301023742104, "percent_no": 42.01698976257896, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Mello/Roos Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.379338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.971933", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Growth and development within the Madera Unified School District boundaries has significantly impacted our schools, especially the high school. With bond proceeds and other state and local resources combined, the community can complete three projects: establish the Madera High School South Campus as a separate high school; refurbish and upgrade the Madera High School North Campus; and aquire a site and construct an elementary. Therefore, shall the Madera Unified School District Community Facilites District No. 1999-1 levy special taxes in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax approved by the Board of Trustees on February 8, 2000; establish an appropriations limit in accordance therewith; and incur a bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $40,000,000 at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12087, "fingerprint": "2000|200000528|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000528|MARIN", "content_hash": "bf7b7b8ef6359541", "measure_id": "200000528", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $120 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 4%, for no more than six years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1814, "no_votes": 422, "total_votes": 2236, "percent_yes": 81.12701252236137, "percent_no": 18.87298747763863, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.205487", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.382873", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.974231", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $120 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 4%, for no more than six years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12084, "fingerprint": "2000|200000219|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000219|MARIN", "content_hash": "86c5ab3041c2a9a8", "measure_id": "200000219", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the following special tax be levied annually upon the property located within County Service Area No. 9 in order to provide additional landscaping and maintenance services within that area?  Fiscal Year 2000-2001 $111.00 Annual Tax; Fiscal Years 2001-2002 2002-2003 $56.00 Annual Tax; Fiscal Years 2003-2004 And Thereafter $28.00 Annual Tax.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 148, "no_votes": 31, "total_votes": 179, "percent_yes": 82.68156424581005, "percent_no": 17.31843575418995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-07-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.204165", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.381467", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.973267", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the following special tax be levied annually upon the property located within County Service Area No. 9 in order to provide additional landscaping and maintenance services within that area?  Fiscal Year 2000-2001 $111.00 Annual Tax; Fiscal Years 2001-2002 2002-2003 $56.00 Annual Tax; Fiscal Years 2003-2004 And Thereafter $28.00 Annual Tax.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12083, "fingerprint": "2000|200000202|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000202|MARIN", "content_hash": "63af7ed91b6ef301", "measure_id": "200000202", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of the local middle school and elementary schools in Larkspur and Corte Madera by repairing and renovating aging facilities, including eliminating hazards from asbestos, reducing dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades, replacing inadequate electrical and heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and sewers, rehabilitating and adding new classrooms, science laboratories and other school facilities, shall Larkspur School District issue $21,700,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with an independent audit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1727, "no_votes": 844, "total_votes": 2571, "percent_yes": 67.17230649552704, "percent_no": 32.82769350447296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.203901", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.381195", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.973076", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of the local middle school and elementary schools in Larkspur and Corte Madera by repairing and renovating aging facilities, including eliminating hazards from asbestos, reducing dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades, replacing inadequate electrical and heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and sewers, rehabilitating and adding new classrooms, science laboratories and other school facilities, shall Larkspur School District issue $21,700,000 of bonds at interest rates within legal limits, with an independent audit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12081, "fingerprint": "2000|200000155|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000155|MARIN", "content_hash": "ec34b700eafa8b28", "measure_id": "200000155", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue its levy for fire protection and emergency medical services for the period July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2004, and thereby adjust its appropriations limit, as provided for in Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, with the understanding that the maximum levy for fiscal year 2000-2001 shall not exceed the rate currently authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 697, "no_votes": 28, "total_votes": 725, "percent_yes": 96.13793103448276, "percent_no": 3.8620689655172384, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.203371", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.380639", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.972697", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Belvedere be authorized to continue its levy for fire protection and emergency medical services for the period July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2004, and thereby adjust its appropriations limit, as provided for in Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, with the understanding that the maximum levy for fiscal year 2000-2001 shall not exceed the rate currently authorized in Chapter 3.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9922, "fingerprint": "2000|200000129|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000129|MARIN", "content_hash": "d3028b55e1ba6c07", "measure_id": "200000129", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Reorganization of school districts - YES.  Voters voting Yes on this measure are voting to transfer the territory known as \"the Ridge Properties\" from the San Rafael Elementary and High School Districts to the Ross Elementary and Tamalpais Union High School Districts.  Reorganization of school districts - NO.  Voters voting No on this measure are voting not to transfer the territory known as \"the Ridge Properties\" from the San Rafael Elementary and High School Districts to the Ross Elementary and Tamalpais Union High School Districts.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 28, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.380336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.972505", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Reorganization of school districts - YES.  Voters voting Yes on this measure are voting to transfer the territory known as \"the Ridge Properties\" from the San Rafael Elementary and High School Districts to the Ross Elementary and Tamalpais Union High School Districts.  Reorganization of school districts - NO.  Voters voting No on this measure are voting not to transfer the territory known as \"the Ridge Properties\" from the San Rafael Elementary and High School Districts to the Ross Elementary and Tamalpais Union High School Districts.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12088, "fingerprint": "2000|200000529|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000529|MARIN", "content_hash": "e11df33750b7b4d6", "measure_id": "200000529", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and provide safety for our children; construct and modernize school facilities, including libraries, computer labs and multi-use rooms for school and community use; repair aging infrastructure such as worn-out electrical and heating systems and restrooms; and construct permanent classrooms to replace aging portables; shall the Shoreline Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $7,000,000 at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1805, "no_votes": 429, "total_votes": 2234, "percent_yes": 80.79677708146822, "percent_no": 19.20322291853178, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.205768", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.383140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.974421", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and provide safety for our children; construct and modernize school facilities, including libraries, computer labs and multi-use rooms for school and community use; repair aging infrastructure such as worn-out electrical and heating systems and restrooms; and construct permanent classrooms to replace aging portables; shall the Shoreline Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $7,000,000 at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12085, "fingerprint": "2000|200000220|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000220|MARIN", "content_hash": "843250987f5eef89", "measure_id": "200000220", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit of County Service Area No. 9 be increased for the next four years equal to the proceeds of the taxes imposed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 142, "no_votes": 37, "total_votes": 179, "percent_yes": 79.3296089385475, "percent_no": 20.670391061452506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-07-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.204426", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.381740", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.973456", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit of County Service Area No. 9 be increased for the next four years equal to the proceeds of the taxes imposed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12082, "fingerprint": "2000|200000156|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000156|MARIN", "content_hash": "5dfbb2da1f62e355", "measure_id": "200000156", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance entitled 'An Ordinance Amending And Readopting Chapter 3.28 Of The Belvedere Municipal Code Regarding A Special Tax And Appropriations Limit Increase To Finance Fire Protection Services And Emergency Medical Services,' which ordinance would increase the special tax for fire and emergency services first adopted by the City of Belvedere in 1980, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 647, "no_votes": 70, "total_votes": 717, "percent_yes": 90.2370990237099, "percent_no": 9.762900976290098, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.203636", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.380926", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.972887", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance entitled 'An Ordinance Amending And Readopting Chapter 3.28 Of The Belvedere Municipal Code Regarding A Special Tax And Appropriations Limit Increase To Finance Fire Protection Services And Emergency Medical Services,' which ordinance would increase the special tax for fire and emergency services first adopted by the City of Belvedere in 1980, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9920, "fingerprint": "2000|200000054|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000054|MARIN", "content_hash": "d733a4ab3c3ceb99", "measure_id": "200000054", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Novato be authorized to issue general obligation bonds in the principal amount of not to exceed fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) for the purpose of financing the acquisition and development of certain streets, storm drain and sidewalk improvements, all as more particularly, described in Ordinance No. 1422?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10736, "no_votes": 3573, "total_votes": 14309, "percent_yes": 75.02970158641415, "percent_no": 24.97029841358585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.379753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.972128", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Novato be authorized to issue general obligation bonds in the principal amount of not to exceed fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) for the purpose of financing the acquisition and development of certain streets, storm drain and sidewalk improvements, all as more particularly, described in Ordinance No. 1422?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12086, "fingerprint": "2000|200000244|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000244|MARIN", "content_hash": "1f111cc6dcae6c94", "measure_id": "200000244", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit established for the Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the fiscal years 2001-02 through 2005-06 in the amount equal to the tax revenue received from the voter-approved fire service charges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1669, "no_votes": 567, "total_votes": 2236, "percent_yes": 74.6422182468694, "percent_no": 25.357781753130595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.204683", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.382024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.973649", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit established for the Marinwood Community Services District pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased over the appropriations limit established by said article for each of the fiscal years 2001-02 through 2005-06 in the amount equal to the tax revenue received from the voter-approved fire service charges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9921, "fingerprint": "2000|200000055|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000055|MARIN", "content_hash": "adc51844b01bae1d", "measure_id": "200000055", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance authorizing levy of the general municipal services tax from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2004, thereby increasing the appropriations limit of the Town of Ross, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 702, "no_votes": 305, "total_votes": 1007, "percent_yes": 69.71201588877854, "percent_no": 30.287984111221462, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.380029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.972317", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance authorizing levy of the general municipal services tax from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2004, thereby increasing the appropriations limit of the Town of Ross, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9923, "fingerprint": "2000|200000245|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000245|MARIN", "content_hash": "92ed8b2f410b44f7", "measure_id": "200000245", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the special tax levied annually upon living units located within County Service Area No. 17 be increased from $195.00 per year to an amount not to exceed $260.00 per year for each living unit within that area commencing with the 2001-2002 fiscal year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 486, "no_votes": 295, "total_votes": 781, "percent_yes": 62.22791293213829, "percent_no": 37.77208706786171, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.382332", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.973845", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the special tax levied annually upon living units located within County Service Area No. 17 be increased from $195.00 per year to an amount not to exceed $260.00 per year for each living unit within that area commencing with the 2001-2002 fiscal year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9924, "fingerprint": "2000|200000246|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000246|MARIN", "content_hash": "550f38f63fccaafc", "measure_id": "200000246", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit of County Service Area No. 17 be increased for four years starting with the 2001-2002 fiscal year equal to the proceeds of the taxes imposed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 460, "no_votes": 281, "total_votes": 741, "percent_yes": 62.07827260458839, "percent_no": 37.92172739541161, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.382603", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.974038", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit of County Service Area No. 17 be increased for four years starting with the 2001-2002 fiscal year equal to the proceeds of the taxes imposed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9933, "fingerprint": "2000|200000530|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000530|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "80a34b6ec5cff42f", "measure_id": "200000530", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Norman Whipple be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member of the Round Valley Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 510, "no_votes": 199, "total_votes": 709, "percent_yes": 71.93229901269393, "percent_no": 28.06770098730607, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.385728", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.976160", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Norman Whipple be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member of the Round Valley Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9934, "fingerprint": "2000|200000531|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000531|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "befd3b620bc96af5", "measure_id": "200000531", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Allan Bier be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member of the Round Valley Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 436, "no_votes": 228, "total_votes": 664, "percent_yes": 65.66265060240963, "percent_no": 34.33734939759037, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.386128", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.976351", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Allan Bier be recalled (removed) from the office of School Board Member of the Round Valley Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9926, "fingerprint": "2000|200000180|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000180|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "ebffdc007959d7ec", "measure_id": "200000180", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace our unsafe sixty-two year old high school with a new comprehensive high school with adequate electrical wiring in the library and classrooms for computer and technology needs; provide the community with a place for community recreation, cultural, and academic activities; acquire a new high school site; repair school facilities, and qualify for state matching funds; shall the Laytonville Unified School District sell $3.5 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and independent audits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 493, "no_votes": 234, "total_votes": 727, "percent_yes": 67.81292984869326, "percent_no": 32.18707015130674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.383753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.974808", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace our unsafe sixty-two year old high school with a new comprehensive high school with adequate electrical wiring in the library and classrooms for computer and technology needs; provide the community with a place for community recreation, cultural, and academic activities; acquire a new high school site; repair school facilities, and qualify for state matching funds; shall the Laytonville Unified School District sell $3.5 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, with citizen oversight and independent audits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9925, "fingerprint": "2000|200000179|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000179|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "7eafcc111fe580aa", "measure_id": "200000179", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Arena Union Elementary School District form a Citizens' Oversight Committee and be authorized to issue $2,505,000 in bonds (at interest rates within the legal limit) for specific projects in the Bond plan, including matching approximately $1,658,378 in State grants for modernizing/repairing aging Arena Elementary School, and constructing sagety/security projects for parking, traffic circulation, security lighting, fencing, bathrooms, nurse's facility, replacement of condemned classrooms, and acquiring a site and plans for a second school near Gualala?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 380, "no_votes": 240, "total_votes": 620, "percent_yes": 61.29032258064516, "percent_no": 38.70967741935484, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.383407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.974616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Arena Union Elementary School District form a Citizens' Oversight Committee and be authorized to issue $2,505,000 in bonds (at interest rates within the legal limit) for specific projects in the Bond plan, including matching approximately $1,658,378 in State grants for modernizing/repairing aging Arena Elementary School, and constructing sagety/security projects for parking, traffic circulation, security lighting, fencing, bathrooms, nurse's facility, replacement of condemned classrooms, and acquiring a site and plans for a second school near Gualala?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9927, "fingerprint": "2000|200000181|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000181|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "cf387c30388303d9", "measure_id": "200000181", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Point Arena Joint High School District form a Citizen's Oversight Committee and be authorized to issue $4,235,000 in bonds (at interest rates within the legal limit) to fund the specific projects in the Bond plan, including classrooms, cafeteria/kitchens, bathrooms, security lighting, weather appropriate sidewalks and parking/driveways at each high school, and match approximately $757,488 of State grants for modernizing science laboratories, leaky roofs, gymnasium floors, drainage, lighting, windows and electrical systems at Point Arena High School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 450, "no_votes": 281, "total_votes": 731, "percent_yes": 61.55950752393981, "percent_no": 38.44049247606019, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.384023", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.975002", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Point Arena Joint High School District form a Citizen's Oversight Committee and be authorized to issue $4,235,000 in bonds (at interest rates within the legal limit) to fund the specific projects in the Bond plan, including classrooms, cafeteria/kitchens, bathrooms, security lighting, weather appropriate sidewalks and parking/driveways at each high school, and match approximately $757,488 of State grants for modernizing science laboratories, leaky roofs, gymnasium floors, drainage, lighting, windows and electrical systems at Point Arena High School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9928, "fingerprint": "2000|200000247|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000247|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "428a01dae8bbb047", "measure_id": "200000247", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordiance titled \"Cannabis Personal Use Ordinance for Mendocino County\" be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19293, "no_votes": 13669, "total_votes": 32962, "percent_yes": 58.53103573812268, "percent_no": 41.46896426187732, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.384362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.975194", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordiance titled \"Cannabis Personal Use Ordinance for Mendocino County\" be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9929, "fingerprint": "2000|200000380|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000380|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "1710f9e3538430e7", "measure_id": "200000380", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive rather than elective?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2146, "no_votes": 2811, "total_votes": 4957, "percent_yes": 43.29231389953601, "percent_no": 56.70768610046399, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.384630", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.975387", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive rather than elective?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9930, "fingerprint": "2000|200000381|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000381|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "766c095dd812f5fe", "measure_id": "200000381", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of Mayor be appointed by the City Council from among five elected City Council members rather than elected?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1108, "no_votes": 3877, "total_votes": 4985, "percent_yes": 22.22668004012036, "percent_no": 77.77331995987964, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.384907", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.975579", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of Mayor be appointed by the City Council from among five elected City Council members rather than elected?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9931, "fingerprint": "2000|200000382|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000382|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "284ed672d21cf24c", "measure_id": "200000382", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If the office of elective Mayor is not eliminated, should the current two-year term of office be increased to a four-year term of office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2419, "no_votes": 2504, "total_votes": 4923, "percent_yes": 49.1367052610197, "percent_no": 50.8632947389803, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.385172", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.975775", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If the office of elective Mayor is not eliminated, should the current two-year term of office be increased to a four-year term of office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9932, "fingerprint": "2000|200000383|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000383|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "00132d4668cf0917", "measure_id": "200000383", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ukiah City Code Section 1752 be amended by increasing the Hotel-Motel Room Occupancy Tax from 8% to 10% in the City of Ukiah?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2224, "no_votes": 2735, "total_votes": 4959, "percent_yes": 44.84775156281508, "percent_no": 55.15224843718492, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.385438", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.975968", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ukiah City Code Section 1752 be amended by increasing the Hotel-Motel Room Occupancy Tax from 8% to 10% in the City of Ukiah?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9935, "fingerprint": "2000|200000161|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000161|MERCED", "content_hash": "aebfc91299e0f6f9", "measure_id": "200000161", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, reduce overcrowding at existing schools, construct additional classrooms, repair and upgrade all schools in the District, modernize heating, ventilation, and electrical systems, provide students with access to modern technology, and make the District eligible to receive over $5.3 million in state-matching funds, shall the Dos Palos Oro-Loma Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $3.5 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 502, "no_votes": 296, "total_votes": 798, "percent_yes": 62.90726817042607, "percent_no": 37.09273182957393, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.386441", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.976545", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, reduce overcrowding at existing schools, construct additional classrooms, repair and upgrade all schools in the District, modernize heating, ventilation, and electrical systems, provide students with access to modern technology, and make the District eligible to receive over $5.3 million in state-matching funds, shall the Dos Palos Oro-Loma Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $3.5 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9936, "fingerprint": "2000|200000203|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000203|MERCED", "content_hash": "af4ba5ba1ef5ee3f", "measure_id": "200000203", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide students with a better education, modernize neighborhood schools, construct additional permanent classrooms, replace obsolete plumbing and electrical systems, upgrade existing classrooms, repair leaky roofs, provide students with access to modern technology, and make the district eligible to receive over $1,600,000 in State-matching funds, shall the Weaver Union School DIstrict be authorized to issue $2,800,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit to acquire, construct and improve school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 486, "no_votes": 164, "total_votes": 650, "percent_yes": 74.76923076923076, "percent_no": 25.23076923076924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.386753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.976739", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide students with a better education, modernize neighborhood schools, construct additional permanent classrooms, replace obsolete plumbing and electrical systems, upgrade existing classrooms, repair leaky roofs, provide students with access to modern technology, and make the district eligible to receive over $1,600,000 in State-matching funds, shall the Weaver Union School DIstrict be authorized to issue $2,800,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit to acquire, construct and improve school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9937, "fingerprint": "2000|200000384|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000384|MERCED", "content_hash": "54ae864480b0f91e", "measure_id": "200000384", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a Mayor and Four Council persons?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 964, "no_votes": 354, "total_votes": 1318, "percent_yes": 73.14112291350531, "percent_no": 26.858877086494687, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.387019", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.976930", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a Mayor and Four Council persons?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9938, "fingerprint": "2000|200000385|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000385|MERCED", "content_hash": "9c0af7ba4c3aa670", "measure_id": "200000385", "measure_letter": "D1", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office for the Mayor be Two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1046, "no_votes": 237, "total_votes": 1283, "percent_yes": 81.52766952455183, "percent_no": 18.472330475448175, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.387286", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.977123", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office for the Mayor be Two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12089, "fingerprint": "2000|200000386|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000386|MERCED", "content_hash": "973af5be1764a531", "measure_id": "200000386", "measure_letter": "D2", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office for the Mayor be Four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 904, "no_votes": 306, "total_votes": 1210, "percent_yes": 74.7107438016529, "percent_no": 25.289256198347104, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.209721", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.387563", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.977312", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office for the Mayor be Four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9939, "fingerprint": "2000|200000226|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000226|MONO", "content_hash": "84312f399169f709", "measure_id": "200000226", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to expand and improve the Mammoth Campus of the Cerro Coso College, build additional classrooms and labs, construct an astronomy center, a new library and an arts center, shall the Mammoth Campus, Kern Community College School Facilities Improvement District issue $15 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit to acquire, construct, and improve facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 853, "no_votes": 261, "total_votes": 1114, "percent_yes": 76.5709156193896, "percent_no": 23.429084380610405, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-09-26", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.387892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.977500", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to expand and improve the Mammoth Campus of the Cerro Coso College, build additional classrooms and labs, construct an astronomy center, a new library and an arts center, shall the Mammoth Campus, Kern Community College School Facilities Improvement District issue $15 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit to acquire, construct, and improve facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12092, "fingerprint": "2000|200000248|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000248|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d94ef6745a836488", "measure_id": "200000248", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City adopt the following Home-Rule City Charter amendment relative to a \"No Safe-Seat to run for Mayor\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 70475, "no_votes": 40350, "total_votes": 110825, "percent_yes": 63.59124746221521, "percent_no": 36.40875253778479, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.212526", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.391212", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.979634", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City adopt the following Home-Rule City Charter amendment relative to a \"No Safe-Seat to run for Mayor\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12090, "fingerprint": "2000|200000188|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000188|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "204b23a6a1de649e", "measure_id": "200000188", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate and modernize schools in the Carmel Unified School District, which are all over 35 years of age, including upgrading science labs, replacing aging plumbing and inefficient heating and ventilating systems, upgrading electrical systems to provide better access to technology, accomplish other necessary building improvements and construct new facilities, shall the Carmel Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at authorized interest rates for the aquisition and improvement of school facilities and grounds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5161, "no_votes": 1120, "total_votes": 6281, "percent_yes": 82.16844451520458, "percent_no": 17.831555484795416, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.212120", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.390636", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.979270", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate and modernize schools in the Carmel Unified School District, which are all over 35 years of age, including upgrading science labs, replacing aging plumbing and inefficient heating and ventilating systems, upgrading electrical systems to provide better access to technology, accomplish other necessary building improvements and construct new facilities, shall the Carmel Unified School District issue $20,000,000 in bonds at authorized interest rates for the aquisition and improvement of school facilities and grounds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9940, "fingerprint": "2000|200000013|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000013|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "fd05ed3e9175afb1", "measure_id": "200000013", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "COUNTYWIDE PARAMEDIC EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SYSTEM: Shall the current annual benefit assessment of up to $12.00 per unit be replaced by a special tax of the same amount for the purpose of funding the countywide paramedic emergency medical services system, which will provide advanced life saving support to victims in response to emergency calls, as approved by Monterey County voters in an advisory measure in 1988?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55548, "no_votes": 22765, "total_votes": 78313, "percent_yes": 70.93075223781491, "percent_no": 29.069247762185086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.388301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.977693", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "COUNTYWIDE PARAMEDIC EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SYSTEM: Shall the current annual benefit assessment of up to $12.00 per unit be replaced by a special tax of the same amount for the purpose of funding the countywide paramedic emergency medical services system, which will provide advanced life saving support to victims in response to emergency calls, as approved by Monterey County voters in an advisory measure in 1988?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12091, "fingerprint": "2000|200000204|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000204|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "1dd0b3cb69fcaf76", "measure_id": "200000204", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the \"Del Monte Forest Plan: Forest Preservation and Development Limitations\" initiative ordinance be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1248, "no_votes": 629, "total_votes": 1877, "percent_yes": 66.48907831646244, "percent_no": 33.51092168353756, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.212328", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.390930", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.979454", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the \"Del Monte Forest Plan: Forest Preservation and Development Limitations\" initiative ordinance be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9942, "fingerprint": "2000|200000057|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000057|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "82b1fe8c81c997d4", "measure_id": "200000057", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance, \"A Revised Proposal to Increase Regulation of Development in the Waterfront and Cannery Row Areas and Downzone Property by Creation of a New Overlay Zoning District through Amendments to the Monterey City Code, General Plan, Monterey Harbor Local Coastal Plan and Cannery Row Local Coastal Plan\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3184, "no_votes": 5011, "total_votes": 8195, "percent_yes": 38.852959121415495, "percent_no": 61.147040878584505, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.388862", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.978153", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance, \"A Revised Proposal to Increase Regulation of Development in the Waterfront and Cannery Row Areas and Downzone Property by Creation of a New Overlay Zoning District through Amendments to the Monterey City Code, General Plan, Monterey Harbor Local Coastal Plan and Cannery Row Local Coastal Plan\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12093, "fingerprint": "2000|200000388|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000388|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "fcc75bdebe0f4b84", "measure_id": "200000388", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City adopt the following Home-Rule City Charter amendment to establish procedures for appointments to fill City Council vacancies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3415, "no_votes": 1711, "total_votes": 5126, "percent_yes": 66.6211470932501, "percent_no": 33.3788529067499, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.213047", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.391867", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.980001", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City adopt the following Home-Rule City Charter amendment to establish procedures for appointments to fill City Council vacancies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9943, "fingerprint": "2000|200000058|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000058|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "6ef94208d14b419c", "measure_id": "200000058", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CITY OF MONTEREY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES: Shall the current annual benefit assessment of up to $5.00 per benefit unit be replaced by an Ordinance enacting a special tax of the same $5.00 amount for the purpose of funding emergency medical services, as approved by CIty of Monterey voters in an advisory measure in 1988?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5504, "no_votes": 2066, "total_votes": 7570, "percent_yes": 72.70805812417437, "percent_no": 27.29194187582563, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.389129", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.978341", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CITY OF MONTEREY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES: Shall the current annual benefit assessment of up to $5.00 per benefit unit be replaced by an Ordinance enacting a special tax of the same $5.00 amount for the purpose of funding emergency medical services, as approved by CIty of Monterey voters in an advisory measure in 1988?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12094, "fingerprint": "2000|200000389|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000389|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "987184e231e97892", "measure_id": "200000389", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the city adopt the Ordinance found in the Election Department's Sample Ballot and Voter Pamphlet and on file in the City Clerk's office to establish an Urban Growth Boundary line, located generally along the northerly side of the City of Marina, and to prohibit for a period of approximately twenty (20) years any new development other than park and open space uses above such Urban Growth Boundary line?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3632, "no_votes": 1456, "total_votes": 5088, "percent_yes": 71.38364779874213, "percent_no": 28.616352201257868, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.213252", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.392139", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.980185", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city adopt the Ordinance found in the Election Department's Sample Ballot and Voter Pamphlet and on file in the City Clerk's office to establish an Urban Growth Boundary line, located generally along the northerly side of the City of Marina, and to prohibit for a period of approximately twenty (20) years any new development other than park and open space uses above such Urban Growth Boundary line?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9944, "fingerprint": "2000|200000059|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000059|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "da56801d18698214", "measure_id": "200000059", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "A Special Tax To Replace The Current CSA 74 Benefit Assessment For Enhanced Emergency Medical Services In The City Of Salinas.  Shall the current CSA 74 annual benefits assessment of $5.00 per benefit unit, to provide paramedic and enhanced medical related services to victims in response to emergency calls, be replaced by an ordinance imposing a special tax in the same amount?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10737, "no_votes": 9480, "total_votes": 20217, "percent_yes": 53.108769847158335, "percent_no": 46.891230152841665, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.389405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.978529", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "A Special Tax To Replace The Current CSA 74 Benefit Assessment For Enhanced Emergency Medical Services In The City Of Salinas.  Shall the current CSA 74 annual benefits assessment of $5.00 per benefit unit, to provide paramedic and enhanced medical related services to victims in response to emergency calls, be replaced by an ordinance imposing a special tax in the same amount?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12095, "fingerprint": "2000|200000390|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000390|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "14a8486dc3da14f9", "measure_id": "200000390", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the City of Sand City adopt the following ordinance?  The City Council may act by ordinance from time to time and at any time to increase the rate of tax charged for occupancy in any hotel in Sand City to not more than fourteen (14%) percent, or to decrease the rate of that tax to not less than eight (8%) percent.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2925, "no_votes": 2595, "total_votes": 5520, "percent_yes": 52.9891304347826, "percent_no": 47.0108695652174, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.213451", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.392415", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.980366", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the City of Sand City adopt the following ordinance?  The City Council may act by ordinance from time to time and at any time to increase the rate of tax charged for occupancy in any hotel in Sand City to not more than fourteen (14%) percent, or to decrease the rate of that tax to not less than eight (8%) percent.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9941, "fingerprint": "2000|200000056|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000056|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "cce762dbadf7d5b1", "measure_id": "200000056", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CITY-WIDE FIRST RESPONDER ENHANCED EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SPECIAL TAX.  Shall the City of Gonzales supplement services provided by the Monterey County Emergency Medical Services System, as approved by Monterey County voters in an advisory measure in 1988, through the imposition of a special tax in the amount of $5.00 per service unit for the purpose of funding additional or enhanced first responder emergency medical services to be provided in response to emergency calls within the City of Gonzales?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 706, "no_votes": 290, "total_votes": 996, "percent_yes": 70.88353413654619, "percent_no": 29.11646586345381, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.388586", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.977955", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CITY-WIDE FIRST RESPONDER ENHANCED EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SPECIAL TAX.  Shall the City of Gonzales supplement services provided by the Monterey County Emergency Medical Services System, as approved by Monterey County voters in an advisory measure in 1988, through the imposition of a special tax in the amount of $5.00 per service unit for the purpose of funding additional or enhanced first responder emergency medical services to be provided in response to emergency calls within the City of Gonzales?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12097, "fingerprint": "2000|200000392|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000392|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "74e845989fddf25c", "measure_id": "200000392", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Monterey City Charter be amended to add Section 2.75, stating that all City-owned property located within the Cannery Row, Harbor or Del Monte Beach Local Coastal Plan areas of the Coastal Zone, and which is zoned \"O\" (open space district) shall be retained as such and not sold or transferred without first receiving approval for the decision to rezone, sell or transfer the property from a majority of the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41, "no_votes": 29, "total_votes": 70, "percent_yes": 58.57142857142858, "percent_no": 41.42857142857142, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.213851", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.393182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.980735", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Monterey City Charter be amended to add Section 2.75, stating that all City-owned property located within the Cannery Row, Harbor or Del Monte Beach Local Coastal Plan areas of the Coastal Zone, and which is zoned \"O\" (open space district) shall be retained as such and not sold or transferred without first receiving approval for the decision to rezone, sell or transfer the property from a majority of the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9945, "fingerprint": "2000|200000060|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000060|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "611748b2abf724ff", "measure_id": "200000060", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CITY-WIDE FIRST RESPONDER ENHANCED EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SPECIAL TAX.  Shall the City of Soledad supplement services provided by the Monterey County Emergency Medical Services System, as approved by Monterey County voters in an advisory measure in 1988, through the imposition of a special tax in the amount of $5.00 per service unit for the purpose of funding additional or enhanced first responder emergency medical services to be provided in response to emergency calls within the City of Soledad?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 785, "no_votes": 420, "total_votes": 1205, "percent_yes": 65.14522821576763, "percent_no": 34.85477178423237, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.389729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.978724", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CITY-WIDE FIRST RESPONDER ENHANCED EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SPECIAL TAX.  Shall the City of Soledad supplement services provided by the Monterey County Emergency Medical Services System, as approved by Monterey County voters in an advisory measure in 1988, through the imposition of a special tax in the amount of $5.00 per service unit for the purpose of funding additional or enhanced first responder emergency medical services to be provided in response to emergency calls within the City of Soledad?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12096, "fingerprint": "2000|200000391|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000391|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "9be9e3cb8c919702", "measure_id": "200000391", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing utility user's tax be made applicable to cellular telephones and be increased from 2% to 3% for all taxable utility services, and also be made applicable to gas used by co-generation plants, with a maximum annual tax of $23,000 on such plants, and a maximum annual tax of $2,000 for any given utility service for all other service users?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8734, "no_votes": 1643, "total_votes": 10377, "percent_yes": 84.16690758408018, "percent_no": 15.833092415919822, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.213649", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.392814", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.980548", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing utility user's tax be made applicable to cellular telephones and be increased from 2% to 3% for all taxable utility services, and also be made applicable to gas used by co-generation plants, with a maximum annual tax of $23,000 on such plants, and a maximum annual tax of $2,000 for any given utility service for all other service users?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9947, "fingerprint": "2000|200000131|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000131|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a441bd02dca1d9ab", "measure_id": "200000131", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, reduce overcrowding at existing elementary schools, construct new middle school facilities, repair and upgrade classrooms, improve heating, ventilation, and electrical systems, provide students with access to modern technology, and make the District eligible to receive State-matching funds, shall the Gonzales Unified School District Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue $6,500,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 899, "no_votes": 303, "total_votes": 1202, "percent_yes": 74.79201331114808, "percent_no": 25.207986688851918, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.390366", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.979088", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, reduce overcrowding at existing elementary schools, construct new middle school facilities, repair and upgrade classrooms, improve heating, ventilation, and electrical systems, provide students with access to modern technology, and make the District eligible to receive State-matching funds, shall the Gonzales Unified School District Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue $6,500,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9948, "fingerprint": "2000|200000387|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000387|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "6f415d3be34cb2d9", "measure_id": "200000387", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall North Monterey County Unified School District issue $15 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits of expenditures, to build a middle school for students in grades 7 and 8, and refurbish schools over 30 years old? State matching funds are anticipated:50% for the middle school and 80% for refurbishing.  Refurbishing projects may include roofs, heating, plumbing, and sewer systems, restrooms, lighting, doors, windows and ceilings, floors, painting, handicapped access and electrical upgrades.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 476, "no_votes": 1197, "total_votes": 1673, "percent_yes": 28.45188284518828, "percent_no": 71.54811715481172, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.391481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.979819", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall North Monterey County Unified School District issue $15 million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits of expenditures, to build a middle school for students in grades 7 and 8, and refurbish schools over 30 years old? State matching funds are anticipated:50% for the middle school and 80% for refurbishing.  Refurbishing projects may include roofs, heating, plumbing, and sewer systems, restrooms, lighting, doors, windows and ceilings, floors, painting, handicapped access and electrical upgrades.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9946, "fingerprint": "2000|200000130|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000130|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a9c725e1a09704c7", "measure_id": "200000130", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the abolition of trustee areas and the election of each member of the governing board of the Chualar Union School District by the registered voters of the entire Chualar Union School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 198, "no_votes": 91, "total_votes": 289, "percent_yes": 68.5121107266436, "percent_no": 31.4878892733564, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.390094", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.978908", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the abolition of trustee areas and the election of each member of the governing board of the Chualar Union School District by the registered voters of the entire Chualar Union School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9949, "fingerprint": "2000|200000001|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000001|NAPA", "content_hash": "7cc5990a6bebf382", "measure_id": "200000001", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 99-1 be adopted?  (Ord No 99-1 creates a Historic Resource General Plan designation (\"HR\") and a Historic Preservation Combination Zoning District (\":HP\") and applies the HR designation to the Aetna Springs property within the :HP which will enable Aetna Springs to resume historic resort types of uses and offer lodging accomodations for no more than 200 persons per night).", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8228, "no_votes": 13102, "total_votes": 21330, "percent_yes": 38.57477730895452, "percent_no": 61.42522269104548, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-01-04", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.393512", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.980920", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 99-1 be adopted?  (Ord No 99-1 creates a Historic Resource General Plan designation (\"HR\") and a Historic Preservation Combination Zoning District (\":HP\") and applies the HR designation to the Aetna Springs property within the :HP which will enable Aetna Springs to resume historic resort types of uses and offer lodging accomodations for no more than 200 persons per night).", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9950, "fingerprint": "2000|200000014|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000014|NAPA", "content_hash": "36935dc7a9322ae9", "measure_id": "200000014", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1185 be approved?  (This ordinance will increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) applicable in the unincorporated area by one and one-half percent and require the proceeds of this tax increase to be used for the following special purposes: purchase fire protection equipment, fund acquisition of fire station sites and construction of fire stations, provide limited funding for the Visitors and Convention Bureau and protect and enhance open space and open space recreation.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22997, "no_votes": 12587, "total_votes": 35584, "percent_yes": 64.62736061151078, "percent_no": 35.37263938848922, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.393951", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.981104", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1185 be approved?  (This ordinance will increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) applicable in the unincorporated area by one and one-half percent and require the proceeds of this tax increase to be used for the following special purposes: purchase fire protection equipment, fund acquisition of fire station sites and construction of fire stations, provide limited funding for the Visitors and Convention Bureau and protect and enhance open space and open space recreation.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9951, "fingerprint": "2000|200000249|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000249|NAPA", "content_hash": "421c90f006da85cf", "measure_id": "200000249", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2000-1 be enacted?  (The Ordinance will increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) applicable in the unincorporated area from ten and one-half (10 1/2) percent to twelve (12) percent and require the proceeds of this Hotel tax increase to be used for the following special purposes: acquisition, protection and enhancement of parks/open space and providing a stable but limited funding source for the Napa Valley Conference and Visitors Bureau.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30963, "no_votes": 17671, "total_votes": 48634, "percent_yes": 63.66533700703212, "percent_no": 36.33466299296788, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.394323", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.981292", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2000-1 be enacted?  (The Ordinance will increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotel Tax) applicable in the unincorporated area from ten and one-half (10 1/2) percent to twelve (12) percent and require the proceeds of this Hotel tax increase to be used for the following special purposes: acquisition, protection and enhancement of parks/open space and providing a stable but limited funding source for the Napa Valley Conference and Visitors Bureau.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9953, "fingerprint": "2000|200000132|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000132|NEVADA", "content_hash": "7e70715bc0cd0e90", "measure_id": "200000132", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the abolition of trustee areas in Twin Ridges Elementary School District - Yes.  For the abolition of trustee areas in Twin Ridges Elementary School District - No.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 476, "no_votes": 238, "total_votes": 714, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.394989", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.981662", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the abolition of trustee areas in Twin Ridges Elementary School District - Yes.  For the abolition of trustee areas in Twin Ridges Elementary School District - No.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9952, "fingerprint": "2000|200000061|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000061|NEVADA", "content_hash": "95a9ddee83cec7dd", "measure_id": "200000061", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the City of Nevada City adopt Ordinance 99-01 such that each parcel of improved real property within the City of Nevada City shall be annually taxed and the revenue generated be used only to pay fire department personnel and for capital acquisition, said tax to be as follows: Single Family Residence - $24, Each Apartment or Condominium - $16, Each Mobile Home - $16.  All commercially used property, including but not limited to, Commercial, Industrial, Office, Professional, Retail, Hotels and Motels as follows: (a) 0 feet to 5,000 square feet in size - $100; (b)  5,001 square feet to 7,500 square feet in size - $150; (c) 7,501 square feet to 10,000 square feet in size - $200; (d) 10,001 square feet to 20,000 square feet in size - $300; (e) 20,001 square feet to 50,000 square feet in size - $400; (f) 50,001 square feet or greater in size - $500.  The above parcel taxes shall be in addition to the current parcel tax rates approved by the voters on November 4, 1986.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 701, "no_votes": 613, "total_votes": 1314, "percent_yes": 53.34855403348554, "percent_no": 46.65144596651446, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.394606", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.981478", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the City of Nevada City adopt Ordinance 99-01 such that each parcel of improved real property within the City of Nevada City shall be annually taxed and the revenue generated be used only to pay fire department personnel and for capital acquisition, said tax to be as follows: Single Family Residence - $24, Each Apartment or Condominium - $16, Each Mobile Home - $16.  All commercially used property, including but not limited to, Commercial, Industrial, Office, Professional, Retail, Hotels and Motels as follows: (a) 0 feet to 5,000 square feet in size - $100; (b)  5,001 square feet to 7,500 square feet in size - $150; (c) 7,501 square feet to 10,000 square feet in size - $200; (d) 10,001 square feet to 20,000 square feet in size - $300; (e) 20,001 square feet to 50,000 square feet in size - $400; (f) 50,001 square feet or greater in size - $500.  The above parcel taxes shall be in addition to the current parcel tax rates approved by the voters on November 4, 1986.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9954, "fingerprint": "2000|200000250|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000250|NEVADA", "content_hash": "212927c4eaf54793", "measure_id": "200000250", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Nevada levy an annual special tax upon all taxable real property located within the boundaries of the Beyers Lane Community Service District in an amount not to exceed $100 per parcel for the purpose of providing road maintenance and improvements within the boundaries of the Beyers Lane Community Service District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 69, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 81, "percent_yes": 85.18518518518519, "percent_no": 14.81481481481481, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.395267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.981844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Nevada levy an annual special tax upon all taxable real property located within the boundaries of the Beyers Lane Community Service District in an amount not to exceed $100 per parcel for the purpose of providing road maintenance and improvements within the boundaries of the Beyers Lane Community Service District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12101, "fingerprint": "2000|200000206|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000206|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c075399b106ebc07", "measure_id": "200000206", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions in neighborhood schools by rehabilitating aging school facilities, replacing deteriorated roofs and plumbing, upgrading electrical service to safely accomodate technology, renovating inadequate classrooms, science labs, and restrooms, and upgrading fire alarms by funding only the specific projects included in Newport-Mesa Unified School District's Facilities Master Plan, shall Newport-Mesa Unified School District issue $110,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, require annual audits, establish an ongoing repair fund, and an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15565, "no_votes": 6010, "total_votes": 21575, "percent_yes": 72.14368482039397, "percent_no": 27.856315179606028, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.218158", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.398906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.984274", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions in neighborhood schools by rehabilitating aging school facilities, replacing deteriorated roofs and plumbing, upgrading electrical service to safely accomodate technology, renovating inadequate classrooms, science labs, and restrooms, and upgrading fire alarms by funding only the specific projects included in Newport-Mesa Unified School District's Facilities Master Plan, shall Newport-Mesa Unified School District issue $110,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, require annual audits, establish an ongoing repair fund, and an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9963, "fingerprint": "2000|200000162|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000162|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b260dbacfa4c4131", "measure_id": "200000162", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "FAIR LOCAL FUNDING TO RETAIN TEACHERS AND TO SUPPORT CURRENT QUALITY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS.  Shall the Irvine Unified School District be authorized to enact a special levy of $95 per assessor's parcel to be used exclusively to retain teachers, to keep neighborhood schools open, and to support student safety, science, technology, smaller class size, art, music, counselors, athletics, libraries, and nurses, and shall the District's appropriations limit be adjusted for the period allowed by state law in an amount equal to the revenue raised by the levy, and shall an annual public audit be conducted and reported in a public hearing to ensure earmarked funds are used as intended?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18965, "no_votes": 10528, "total_votes": 29493, "percent_yes": 64.30339402570101, "percent_no": 35.69660597429899, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.398336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.983909", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "FAIR LOCAL FUNDING TO RETAIN TEACHERS AND TO SUPPORT CURRENT QUALITY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS.  Shall the Irvine Unified School District be authorized to enact a special levy of $95 per assessor's parcel to be used exclusively to retain teachers, to keep neighborhood schools open, and to support student safety, science, technology, smaller class size, art, music, counselors, athletics, libraries, and nurses, and shall the District's appropriations limit be adjusted for the period allowed by state law in an amount equal to the revenue raised by the levy, and shall an annual public audit be conducted and reported in a public hearing to ensure earmarked funds are used as intended?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9955, "fingerprint": "2000|200000015|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000015|ORANGE", "content_hash": "58aa6b4571c1be6f", "measure_id": "200000015", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  INITIATIVE TO REQUIRE TWO-THIRDS VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF NEW OR EXPANDED JAIL, HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILL OR CIVILIAN AIRPORT PROJECT.  Shall the initiative measure, which would require that no new or expanded jail, hazardous waste landfill or civilian airport project (all as defined in the measure) shall be valid and effective unless ratified by a two-thirds majority of voters voting in a county general election and requiring that the Board of Supervisors conduct a public hearing in each affected city prior to project approval, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 450546, "no_votes": 218450, "total_votes": 668996, "percent_yes": 67.34659101100753, "percent_no": 32.65340898899247, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.395542", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.982024", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  INITIATIVE TO REQUIRE TWO-THIRDS VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF NEW OR EXPANDED JAIL, HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILL OR CIVILIAN AIRPORT PROJECT.  Shall the initiative measure, which would require that no new or expanded jail, hazardous waste landfill or civilian airport project (all as defined in the measure) shall be valid and effective unless ratified by a two-thirds majority of voters voting in a county general election and requiring that the Board of Supervisors conduct a public hearing in each affected city prior to project approval, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12102, "fingerprint": "2000|200000251|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000251|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6dd07a3b066d6bef", "measure_id": "200000251", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should 60% of the revenues received from the tobacco litigation Master Settlement Agreement be used to fund health care services, tobacco use prevention, and public safety programs and services, with the other 40% used to reduce the County's bankruptcy-related debt?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 393263, "no_votes": 464226, "total_votes": 857489, "percent_yes": 45.86216266331113, "percent_no": 54.13783733668887, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.218367", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.399183", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.984459", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should 60% of the revenues received from the tobacco litigation Master Settlement Agreement be used to fund health care services, tobacco use prevention, and public safety programs and services, with the other 40% used to reduce the County's bankruptcy-related debt?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9962, "fingerprint": "2000|200000133|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000133|ORANGE", "content_hash": "a43de36c94eab454", "measure_id": "200000133", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms and schools throughout the Magnolia School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, provide additional classrooms for class size reduction, make health and safety improvements, and give students access to classroom computers shall the District issue $9.7 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6143, "no_votes": 2165, "total_votes": 8308, "percent_yes": 73.94077997111218, "percent_no": 26.05922002888782, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.398067", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.983723", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms and schools throughout the Magnolia School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, provide additional classrooms for class size reduction, make health and safety improvements, and give students access to classroom computers shall the District issue $9.7 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12103, "fingerprint": "2000|200000252|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000252|ORANGE", "content_hash": "99d49faf1f98ee37", "measure_id": "200000252", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should all revenues received from the tobacco litigation Master Settlement Agreement be used to fund health care services, tobacco use prevention, and public safety programs and services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 550227, "no_votes": 301264, "total_votes": 851491, "percent_yes": 64.61923848872155, "percent_no": 35.38076151127845, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.218567", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.399451", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.984641", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should all revenues received from the tobacco litigation Master Settlement Agreement be used to fund health care services, tobacco use prevention, and public safety programs and services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9956, "fingerprint": "2000|200000062|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000062|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b75e5b398eca3642", "measure_id": "200000062", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance which increases the transient occupancy tax (tax on the renting of hotel and motel rooms) from 10% to 13% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11625, "no_votes": 17249, "total_votes": 28874, "percent_yes": 40.26113458474752, "percent_no": 59.73886541525248, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.395816", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.982212", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance which increases the transient occupancy tax (tax on the renting of hotel and motel rooms) from 10% to 13% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12104, "fingerprint": "2000|200000393|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000393|ORANGE", "content_hash": "88621ea4cdbff0f6", "measure_id": "200000393", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.  Shall specified sections of the City Charter be amended to delete redundant and obsolete language, to confom to provisions of state law, and to change all gender references to include both the male and female genders?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47040, "no_votes": 18953, "total_votes": 65993, "percent_yes": 71.28028730319882, "percent_no": 28.71971269680118, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.218764", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.399725", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.984823", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.  Shall specified sections of the City Charter be amended to delete redundant and obsolete language, to confom to provisions of state law, and to change all gender references to include both the male and female genders?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9957, "fingerprint": "2000|200000063|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000063|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1eba6d0e522dadf0", "measure_id": "200000063", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance to change the General Plan Designation of the Crest View School site from CG-F1 (Commercial General with a maximum floor area ratio of 0.35) to RL-7 (Residential with a maximum of 7 dwelling units per net acre), and to change the Zoning Designation of the Crest View School site from CG (Commercial General) to R-L (Low Density Residential) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26412, "no_votes": 31570, "total_votes": 57982, "percent_yes": 45.55206788313614, "percent_no": 54.44793211686386, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.396086", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.982396", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance to change the General Plan Designation of the Crest View School site from CG-F1 (Commercial General with a maximum floor area ratio of 0.35) to RL-7 (Residential with a maximum of 7 dwelling units per net acre), and to change the Zoning Designation of the Crest View School site from CG (Commercial General) to R-L (Low Density Residential) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12105, "fingerprint": "2000|200000394|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000394|ORANGE", "content_hash": "45ba604e0cb46a3f", "measure_id": "200000394", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "QUALIFICATIONS FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE.  Shall Section 501 of the City Charter be amended to prohibit city employees from holding office as Mayor or City Council member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34182, "no_votes": 31392, "total_votes": 65574, "percent_yes": 52.12736755421356, "percent_no": 47.87263244578644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.219019", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.400049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.985003", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "QUALIFICATIONS FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE.  Shall Section 501 of the City Charter be amended to prohibit city employees from holding office as Mayor or City Council member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9958, "fingerprint": "2000|200000064|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000064|ORANGE", "content_hash": "debed6a43bb46430", "measure_id": "200000064", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  ADVISORY VOTE ONLY.  Shall 50% of the sales tax income from the Crest View site be spent to acquire, develop, improve, maintain sports fields for soccer, football, softball, baseball, and other sports; replace restrooms, bicycle/pedestrian trails, lighting, and showers on city beach; acquire senior center site; develop swim complex, and improve neighborhood parks and tot lots?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34398, "no_votes": 21702, "total_votes": 56100, "percent_yes": 61.31550802139037, "percent_no": 38.68449197860963, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.396364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.982577", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  ADVISORY VOTE ONLY.  Shall 50% of the sales tax income from the Crest View site be spent to acquire, develop, improve, maintain sports fields for soccer, football, softball, baseball, and other sports; replace restrooms, bicycle/pedestrian trails, lighting, and showers on city beach; acquire senior center site; develop swim complex, and improve neighborhood parks and tot lots?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12106, "fingerprint": "2000|200000395|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000395|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6ec810f51431bbe7", "measure_id": "200000395", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "SPECIAL PROSECUTORS.  Shall Section 703 of the City Charter be amended to provide that all criminal prosections shall be conducted by the City Attorney or other public agency and prohibit the City Council from contracting with any person to act as a special prosecutor in criminal cases?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39467, "no_votes": 23712, "total_votes": 63179, "percent_yes": 62.46854176229444, "percent_no": 37.53145823770556, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.219339", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.400319", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.985188", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SPECIAL PROSECUTORS.  Shall Section 703 of the City Charter be amended to provide that all criminal prosections shall be conducted by the City Attorney or other public agency and prohibit the City Council from contracting with any person to act as a special prosecutor in criminal cases?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12100, "fingerprint": "2000|200000205|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000205|ORANGE", "content_hash": "5f77f8a3c91c52d9", "measure_id": "200000205", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, repair and upgrade classrooms, provide health and safety improvements at every school, replace obsolete plumbing and electrical systems, provide students with access to modern classroom technology and make the District eligible to receive over $9.8 million in state-matching funds, shall the La Habra City School District be authroized to issue $16 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2807, "no_votes": 1042, "total_votes": 3849, "percent_yes": 72.92803325539101, "percent_no": 27.071966744608986, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.217941", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.398615", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.984091", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, repair and upgrade classrooms, provide health and safety improvements at every school, replace obsolete plumbing and electrical systems, provide students with access to modern classroom technology and make the District eligible to receive over $9.8 million in state-matching funds, shall the La Habra City School District be authroized to issue $16 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9959, "fingerprint": "2000|200000065|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000065|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6cdd088a2017fe18", "measure_id": "200000065", "measure_letter": "K1", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  K - ADVISORY VOTE ONLY: Which of the following options for providing municipal office space, a council chamber, and an emergency operations center should the City of Mission Viejo pursue (vote for the one you prefer): Lease 47,750 square feet of space at a cost of approximately $107.5 million over the next fifty years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4819, "no_votes": 25976, "total_votes": 30795, "percent_yes": 15.64864426043188, "percent_no": 84.35135573956812, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.396632", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.982786", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  K - ADVISORY VOTE ONLY: Which of the following options for providing municipal office space, a council chamber, and an emergency operations center should the City of Mission Viejo pursue (vote for the one you prefer): Lease 47,750 square feet of space at a cost of approximately $107.5 million over the next fifty years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12098, "fingerprint": "2000|200000066|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000066|ORANGE", "content_hash": "92ff470377b733c0", "measure_id": "200000066", "measure_letter": "K2", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  K - ADVISORY VOTE ONLY: Which of the following options for providing municipal office space, a council chamber, and an emergency operations center should the City of Mission Viejo pursue (vote for the one you prefer): Purchase the 63,500-square-foot building at 25909 Pala at a cost of approximately $81 million (not including seismic safety and renovation) over the next fifty years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3151, "no_votes": 27644, "total_votes": 30795, "percent_yes": 10.23218054879038, "percent_no": 89.76781945120962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.216436", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.396970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.982986", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  K - ADVISORY VOTE ONLY: Which of the following options for providing municipal office space, a council chamber, and an emergency operations center should the City of Mission Viejo pursue (vote for the one you prefer): Purchase the 63,500-square-foot building at 25909 Pala at a cost of approximately $81 million (not including seismic safety and renovation) over the next fifty years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12099, "fingerprint": "2000|200000067|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000067|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1f1f6ffbcf2e420c", "measure_id": "200000067", "measure_letter": "K3", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  K - ADVISORY VOTE ONLY: Which of the following options for providing municipal office space, a council chamber, and an emergency operations center should the City of Mission Viejo pursue (vote for the one you prefer): Build a 47,750-square-foot city hall on land already owned by the City across the courtyard from the Mission Viejo Library at a total construction and financing cost of approximately $57.7 million over the next fifty years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22825, "no_votes": 7970, "total_votes": 30795, "percent_yes": 74.11917519077772, "percent_no": 25.880824809222275, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.216716", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.397257", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.983172", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  K - ADVISORY VOTE ONLY: Which of the following options for providing municipal office space, a council chamber, and an emergency operations center should the City of Mission Viejo pursue (vote for the one you prefer): Build a 47,750-square-foot city hall on land already owned by the City across the courtyard from the Mission Viejo Library at a total construction and financing cost of approximately $57.7 million over the next fifty years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12107, "fingerprint": "2000|200000396|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000396|ORANGE", "content_hash": "ef25bac996ae9c39", "measure_id": "200000396", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CITY FUNDS AND EXPENDITURES.  Shall Sections 705 and 706 of the City Charter be amended to require the City Treasurer to have custody of all City funds and the Finance Director to have control of all City expeditures, except where otherwise authorized by resolution of the City Council, and to expressly authorize the Finance Director to prepare or approve wire transfers, electronic payments and facsimile signature checks for City expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34479, "no_votes": 28799, "total_votes": 63278, "percent_yes": 54.488131736148425, "percent_no": 45.511868263851575, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.219658", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.400593", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.985368", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CITY FUNDS AND EXPENDITURES.  Shall Sections 705 and 706 of the City Charter be amended to require the City Treasurer to have custody of all City funds and the Finance Director to have control of all City expeditures, except where otherwise authorized by resolution of the City Council, and to expressly authorize the Finance Director to prepare or approve wire transfers, electronic payments and facsimile signature checks for City expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9960, "fingerprint": "2000|200000068|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000068|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b6c44ea2f1fa0364", "measure_id": "200000068", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2000-204 be approved, which amends Sections 6.10.304 and 6.10.309 of Chapter 6.10 of the Municipal Code to authorize a maximum term of ten years for residential and commerical integrated waste management franchises?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18330, "no_votes": 11013, "total_votes": 29343, "percent_yes": 62.468050301605146, "percent_no": 37.531949698394854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.397532", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.983355", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2000-204 be approved, which amends Sections 6.10.304 and 6.10.309 of Chapter 6.10 of the Municipal Code to authorize a maximum term of ten years for residential and commerical integrated waste management franchises?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12108, "fingerprint": "2000|200000397|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000397|ORANGE", "content_hash": "7381199419db16b0", "measure_id": "200000397", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "UTILITY RATES.  Shall Section 1221 of the City Charter be amended to permit the City Council to consider market prices and other relevant marketplace factors when setting utility rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23524, "no_votes": 43869, "total_votes": 67393, "percent_yes": 34.90570237264997, "percent_no": 65.09429762735003, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.219995", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.400996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.985552", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "UTILITY RATES.  Shall Section 1221 of the City Charter be amended to permit the City Council to consider market prices and other relevant marketplace factors when setting utility rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9961, "fingerprint": "2000|200000069|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000069|ORANGE", "content_hash": "762b3873534f30cd", "measure_id": "200000069", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 4, 5 and 6 of Ordinance Number 1437-A, which change the zoning to commerical pursuant to the Old Ranch Towne Center plan, be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4671, "no_votes": 6400, "total_votes": 11071, "percent_yes": 42.19131063137928, "percent_no": 57.80868936862072, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.397800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.983538", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 4, 5 and 6 of Ordinance Number 1437-A, which change the zoning to commerical pursuant to the Old Ranch Towne Center plan, be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9964, "fingerprint": "2000|200000398|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000398|ORANGE", "content_hash": "e89846ffd71159fe", "measure_id": "200000398", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a Resolution be adopted to amend the Brea General Plan and approve the \"Brea Hillsides Heritage Initiative,\" thereby requiring the City of Brea to adopt certain thresholds of environmental significance and requiring voter approval of certain development proposals?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7115, "no_votes": 7518, "total_votes": 14633, "percent_yes": 48.622975466411525, "percent_no": 51.377024533588475, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.401267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.985737", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Resolution be adopted to amend the Brea General Plan and approve the \"Brea Hillsides Heritage Initiative,\" thereby requiring the City of Brea to adopt certain thresholds of environmental significance and requiring voter approval of certain development proposals?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9965, "fingerprint": "2000|200000399|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000399|ORANGE", "content_hash": "c86f5fdeba026b3c", "measure_id": "200000399", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to authorize the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa to increase the current Transient Occupancy Tax up to two additional percent points as a special tax for the acquisition and development of parks, recreation facilities and open space in the City of Costa Mesa?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12933, "no_votes": 11708, "total_votes": 24641, "percent_yes": 52.48569457408384, "percent_no": 47.51430542591616, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.401540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.985922", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to authorize the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa to increase the current Transient Occupancy Tax up to two additional percent points as a special tax for the acquisition and development of parks, recreation facilities and open space in the City of Costa Mesa?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9966, "fingerprint": "2000|200000400|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000400|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b47fdf97113e8c9f", "measure_id": "200000400", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance which increases the hotel visitors tax from 10% to 12% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16614, "no_votes": 20420, "total_votes": 37034, "percent_yes": 44.86147864124858, "percent_no": 55.13852135875142, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.401866", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.986110", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance which increases the hotel visitors tax from 10% to 12% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9967, "fingerprint": "2000|200000401|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000401|ORANGE", "content_hash": "52b408194a302fa7", "measure_id": "200000401", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an electric power plant be required to pay the same Utility Tax as do residents and businesses of the City of Huntington Beach by amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code to remove Section 3.36.080(b) and make corresponding changes to Section 3.36.010(g)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32200, "no_votes": 37935, "total_votes": 70135, "percent_yes": 45.91145647679475, "percent_no": 54.08854352320525, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.402130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.986295", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an electric power plant be required to pay the same Utility Tax as do residents and businesses of the City of Huntington Beach by amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code to remove Section 3.36.080(b) and make corresponding changes to Section 3.36.010(g)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9968, "fingerprint": "2000|200000402|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000402|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9ec578455b8e08a3", "measure_id": "200000402", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  ADVISORY VOTE ONLY.  Should the Utility Tax paid solely by an electric power plant be placed into an Infrastructure Fund to be used only for the maintenance, construction, and repair of infrastructure such as sewers, sewage lift stations, storm drains, storm water pump stations, alleys, streets, highways, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street trees, landscaped medians, parks, beach facilities, playgrounds, traffic signals, street lights, and block walls along arterial highways?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45671, "no_votes": 18973, "total_votes": 64644, "percent_yes": 70.65002165707568, "percent_no": 29.349978342924317, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.402396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.986477", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  ADVISORY VOTE ONLY.  Should the Utility Tax paid solely by an electric power plant be placed into an Infrastructure Fund to be used only for the maintenance, construction, and repair of infrastructure such as sewers, sewage lift stations, storm drains, storm water pump stations, alleys, streets, highways, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street trees, landscaped medians, parks, beach facilities, playgrounds, traffic signals, street lights, and block walls along arterial highways?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9969, "fingerprint": "2000|200000403|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000403|ORANGE", "content_hash": "8ff65e8005a311ed", "measure_id": "200000403", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  Shall the Charter be amended to add Section 423 to require voter approval of certain amendments to the Newport Beach General Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21355, "no_votes": 12465, "total_votes": 33820, "percent_yes": 63.1431105854524, "percent_no": 36.8568894145476, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.402664", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.986659", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  Shall the Charter be amended to add Section 423 to require voter approval of certain amendments to the Newport Beach General Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9970, "fingerprint": "2000|200000404|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000404|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f8a8844bcc2bd3d3", "measure_id": "200000404", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  Shall the Charter be amended to add Section 423 to require voter approval of any amendment or repeal of certain provisions of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11641, "no_votes": 21075, "total_votes": 32716, "percent_yes": 35.58197823694828, "percent_no": 64.41802176305171, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.402933", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.986871", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CHARTER AMENDMENT.  Shall the Charter be amended to add Section 423 to require voter approval of any amendment or repeal of certain provisions of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9971, "fingerprint": "2000|200000405|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000405|ORANGE", "content_hash": "aed1c57e9131caf4", "measure_id": "200000405", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordiance entitled \"Residential Building Permit Moratorium,\" which would, with certain exceptions specified in the Ordinance, prohibit the City from issuing building permits for new residential structures in the City until such time as Avenida La Pata is constructed as a paved, divided roadway of not less than four lanes and opened for traffic between Avenida Pico and Antonio Parkway, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9573, "no_votes": 10798, "total_votes": 20371, "percent_yes": 46.99327475332581, "percent_no": 53.00672524667419, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.403218", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.987055", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordiance entitled \"Residential Building Permit Moratorium,\" which would, with certain exceptions specified in the Ordinance, prohibit the City from issuing building permits for new residential structures in the City until such time as Avenida La Pata is constructed as a paved, divided roadway of not less than four lanes and opened for traffic between Avenida Pico and Antonio Parkway, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9972, "fingerprint": "2000|200000070|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000070|PLACER", "content_hash": "658293d9947f0f4a", "measure_id": "200000070", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the position of elected Mayor be abolished and replaced with a member of the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 256, "no_votes": 218, "total_votes": 474, "percent_yes": 54.0084388185654, "percent_no": 45.9915611814346, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.403488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.987236", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the position of elected Mayor be abolished and replaced with a member of the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9988, "fingerprint": "2000|200000418|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000418|PLACER", "content_hash": "05c003775d402055", "measure_id": "200000418", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the territory transfer of the Shelborne Community from the Loomis Union Elementary and the Placer Union High School Districts into the Eureka Union Elementary and the Roseville Joint Union High School Districts be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140, "no_votes": 19, "total_votes": 159, "percent_yes": 88.0503144654088, "percent_no": 11.949685534591197, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.408110", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.990245", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the territory transfer of the Shelborne Community from the Loomis Union Elementary and the Placer Union High School Districts into the Eureka Union Elementary and the Roseville Joint Union High School Districts be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9976, "fingerprint": "2000|200000406|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000406|PLACER", "content_hash": "776a19ee9e39df99", "measure_id": "200000406", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 3.04 of the City Charter be amended to incorporate by reference the express provisions of California Government Code section 1090, et seq., prohibiting city officers and employees from being financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26895, "no_votes": 4718, "total_votes": 31613, "percent_yes": 85.07575997216334, "percent_no": 14.92424002783666, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.404635", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.987970", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 3.04 of the City Charter be amended to incorporate by reference the express provisions of California Government Code section 1090, et seq., prohibiting city officers and employees from being financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9977, "fingerprint": "2000|200000407|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000407|PLACER", "content_hash": "52f181d220b97e41", "measure_id": "200000407", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 3.05 of the City Charter be amended to increase council member and mayor salaries to 1) five hundred dollars ($500) per month if the City's population is between 50,000 and 75,000 persons and 2) six hundred dollars ($600) per month if the City's population exceeds 75,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18096, "no_votes": 14307, "total_votes": 32403, "percent_yes": 55.84668086288307, "percent_no": 44.15331913711693, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.404903", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.988150", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 3.05 of the City Charter be amended to increase council member and mayor salaries to 1) five hundred dollars ($500) per month if the City's population is between 50,000 and 75,000 persons and 2) six hundred dollars ($600) per month if the City's population exceeds 75,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9973, "fingerprint": "2000|200000134|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000134|PLACER", "content_hash": "0e38af7c890d9de5", "measure_id": "200000134", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding, and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 42, "no_votes": 57, "total_votes": 99, "percent_yes": 42.42424242424242, "percent_no": 57.57575757575758, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.403759", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.987420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding, and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9978, "fingerprint": "2000|200000408|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000408|PLACER", "content_hash": "a65faa87cabeedec", "measure_id": "200000408", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 8.08 of the City Charter be amended to provide that the council's determination on any collective bargaining agreement shall be final and binding, and shall not be subject to arbitration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15158, "no_votes": 15929, "total_votes": 31087, "percent_yes": 48.75993180429118, "percent_no": 51.24006819570882, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.405167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.988337", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 8.08 of the City Charter be amended to provide that the council's determination on any collective bargaining agreement shall be final and binding, and shall not be subject to arbitration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9979, "fingerprint": "2000|200000409|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000409|PLACER", "content_hash": "8c87d8cc200b4e6d", "measure_id": "200000409", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 9.01 of the City Charter be amended to provide that for the purposes of accounting for the use of the public right of way, City-owned utilities may pay an in lieu franchise fee not to exceed four percent (4%) of total utility operating and capital expenditures to the City's general fund which shall be budgeted and appropriated solely for police, fire, parks and recreation or library services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17116, "no_votes": 14685, "total_votes": 31801, "percent_yes": 53.82220684884123, "percent_no": 46.17779315115877, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.405466", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.988518", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 9.01 of the City Charter be amended to provide that for the purposes of accounting for the use of the public right of way, City-owned utilities may pay an in lieu franchise fee not to exceed four percent (4%) of total utility operating and capital expenditures to the City's general fund which shall be budgeted and appropriated solely for police, fire, parks and recreation or library services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9980, "fingerprint": "2000|200000410|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000410|PLACER", "content_hash": "20cd5b1cd6489324", "measure_id": "200000410", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended with regard to: (1) Out-of-date provisions: sections 1.05, 2.02, 2.03, 5.10, 8.01; (2) Up-dated provisions: sections 4.06, 8.02, 8.06, 8.07, 9.06, 12.06 and Article 11; (3) Typographical and grammatical corrections: sections 2.06, 7.075, 7.24 and 9.04; (4) Minor procedural changes: sections 2.07, 2.08, 2.12, 2.14, 2.15, 4.02, 4.03 and 5.02; and (5) Minor substance changes: sections 3.07 and 5.07?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22899, "no_votes": 6583, "total_votes": 29482, "percent_yes": 77.67112136218711, "percent_no": 22.328878637812892, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.405789", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.988700", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended with regard to: (1) Out-of-date provisions: sections 1.05, 2.02, 2.03, 5.10, 8.01; (2) Up-dated provisions: sections 4.06, 8.02, 8.06, 8.07, 9.06, 12.06 and Article 11; (3) Typographical and grammatical corrections: sections 2.06, 7.075, 7.24 and 9.04; (4) Minor procedural changes: sections 2.07, 2.08, 2.12, 2.14, 2.15, 4.02, 4.03 and 5.02; and (5) Minor substance changes: sections 3.07 and 5.07?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9981, "fingerprint": "2000|200000411|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000411|PLACER", "content_hash": "abc8d3fdd4a255a3", "measure_id": "200000411", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended as follows: (1) Section 2.13, adding the provision that the city clerk shall be the elections official for all elections held within the city; (2) Section 3.09, deleting the prohibition against designating a person appointed to fill a vacancy on the council as an \"incumbent\"; and (3) Section 6.02, adding that the city clerk shall be the City's chief elections official and authorizing mail ballot elections?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22779, "no_votes": 7281, "total_votes": 30060, "percent_yes": 75.77844311377245, "percent_no": 24.221556886227546, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.406074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.988881", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended as follows: (1) Section 2.13, adding the provision that the city clerk shall be the elections official for all elections held within the city; (2) Section 3.09, deleting the prohibition against designating a person appointed to fill a vacancy on the council as an \"incumbent\"; and (3) Section 6.02, adding that the city clerk shall be the City's chief elections official and authorizing mail ballot elections?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9982, "fingerprint": "2000|200000412|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000412|PLACER", "content_hash": "8e9b5623ffe40afb", "measure_id": "200000412", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended with respect to certain minor fiscal matters as follows: (1) Section 7.02, regarding detailed estimates of expenditures; (2) Section 7.03, adding noticed public hearings; (3) Section 7.06, changing reference to sections; (4) Section 7.07, deleting and reserving section; (5) Section 7.12, referring to bonds payable from general or enterprise funds; (6) Section 10.02 adding \"except for residential utility customers\"; and (7) Section 10.03, referring to disposal of utility assets?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21051, "no_votes": 8022, "total_votes": 29073, "percent_yes": 72.40738829842121, "percent_no": 27.59261170157879, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.406344", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.989065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended with respect to certain minor fiscal matters as follows: (1) Section 7.02, regarding detailed estimates of expenditures; (2) Section 7.03, adding noticed public hearings; (3) Section 7.06, changing reference to sections; (4) Section 7.07, deleting and reserving section; (5) Section 7.12, referring to bonds payable from general or enterprise funds; (6) Section 10.02 adding \"except for residential utility customers\"; and (7) Section 10.03, referring to disposal of utility assets?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9983, "fingerprint": "2000|200000413|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000413|PLACER", "content_hash": "df26e8a55eed6d23", "measure_id": "200000413", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended with regard to certain major fiscal matters as follows: (1) Section 7.21, increasing dollar amount of items requiring going to bid to $100,000.00; and (2) Section 7.23, referring to adoption of an ordinance allowing the use of city forces to perform certain types of work?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12231, "no_votes": 17628, "total_votes": 29859, "percent_yes": 40.96252386215211, "percent_no": 59.03747613784789, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.406692", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.989251", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended with regard to certain major fiscal matters as follows: (1) Section 7.21, increasing dollar amount of items requiring going to bid to $100,000.00; and (2) Section 7.23, referring to adoption of an ordinance allowing the use of city forces to perform certain types of work?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9984, "fingerprint": "2000|200000414|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000414|PLACER", "content_hash": "af0f25b9d80f4980", "measure_id": "200000414", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 7.095 be added to City Charter incorporating the Utility User's Tax as a Charter provision and requiring that all Utility User's Tax revenue be budgeted and appropriated solely for police, fire, parks and recreation or library services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16763, "no_votes": 15328, "total_votes": 32091, "percent_yes": 52.23582936025677, "percent_no": 47.76417063974323, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.406966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.989431", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 7.095 be added to City Charter incorporating the Utility User's Tax as a Charter provision and requiring that all Utility User's Tax revenue be budgeted and appropriated solely for police, fire, parks and recreation or library services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9989, "fingerprint": "2000|200000532|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000532|PLACER", "content_hash": "5c4b92079b1dd5a0", "measure_id": "200000532", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 67, "no_votes": 94, "total_votes": 161, "percent_yes": 41.61490683229814, "percent_no": 58.38509316770186, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.408379", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.990434", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9985, "fingerprint": "2000|200000415|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000415|PLACER", "content_hash": "10748e2ef0e3d592", "measure_id": "200000415", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall certain provisions contained in Chapter 4.32 of the Roseville Municipal Code related to the utility user's tax be repealed and a provision added to the Roseville Municipal Code that the City of Roseville shall not impose a utility user's tax on the Citizens of Roseville?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16674, "no_votes": 15851, "total_votes": 32525, "percent_yes": 51.265180630284405, "percent_no": 48.734819369715595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.407274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.989611", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall certain provisions contained in Chapter 4.32 of the Roseville Municipal Code related to the utility user's tax be repealed and a provision added to the Roseville Municipal Code that the City of Roseville shall not impose a utility user's tax on the Citizens of Roseville?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9986, "fingerprint": "2000|200000416|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000416|PLACER", "content_hash": "37c148e7941e0275", "measure_id": "200000416", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that council members be elected by district with the city divided into five (5) districts and with voters able to vote for one candidate resding within the voter's district and further providing that the office of mayor shall rotate between districts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12227, "no_votes": 20112, "total_votes": 32339, "percent_yes": 37.808837626395366, "percent_no": 62.191162373604634, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.407572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.989797", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to provide that council members be elected by district with the city divided into five (5) districts and with voters able to vote for one candidate resding within the voter's district and further providing that the office of mayor shall rotate between districts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9987, "fingerprint": "2000|200000417|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000417|PLACER", "content_hash": "435b912569511a3c", "measure_id": "200000417", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall section 10.01 of the City Charter be amended to require all city-owned utilities to be fiscally self-sufficient?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23742, "no_votes": 6832, "total_votes": 30574, "percent_yes": 77.65421600052332, "percent_no": 22.34578399947668, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.407844", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.989978", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall section 10.01 of the City Charter be amended to require all city-owned utilities to be fiscally self-sufficient?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9974, "fingerprint": "2000|200000253|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000253|PLACER", "content_hash": "67d09b0e96ac0eca", "measure_id": "200000253", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall any new sales tax revenues approved by voters in this election fund the following projects to preserve our quality of life, in the face of increasing growth?  Preserve water quality by protecting land around our lakes, rivers and creeks; save farmland and ensure a supply of local produce; protect fish and wildlife habitat; enhance recreational opportunities by developing new large parks and a regional trail network; and protect scenic landscapes, such as the Sierra Nevada and Lake Tahoe.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61977, "no_votes": 48161, "total_votes": 110138, "percent_yes": 56.27213132615447, "percent_no": 43.72786867384553, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.404100", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.987603", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall any new sales tax revenues approved by voters in this election fund the following projects to preserve our quality of life, in the face of increasing growth?  Preserve water quality by protecting land around our lakes, rivers and creeks; save farmland and ensure a supply of local produce; protect fish and wildlife habitat; enhance recreational opportunities by developing new large parks and a regional trail network; and protect scenic landscapes, such as the Sierra Nevada and Lake Tahoe.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9975, "fingerprint": "2000|200000254|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000254|PLACER", "content_hash": "f918e470299ed1ea", "measure_id": "200000254", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a 1/4 cent sales tax, public oversight and accountability measure for general County purposes with the following mandatory restrictions?  A local Citizen's Oversight Committee will monitor all expenditures to ensure funds are used efficiently and effectively; annual financial audits, conducted by an independent auditor, must be reported to the public; and the tax expires after twenty (20) years.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30118, "no_votes": 79957, "total_votes": 110075, "percent_yes": 27.36134453781512, "percent_no": 72.63865546218489, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.404368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.987789", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a 1/4 cent sales tax, public oversight and accountability measure for general County purposes with the following mandatory restrictions?  A local Citizen's Oversight Committee will monitor all expenditures to ensure funds are used efficiently and effectively; annual financial audits, conducted by an independent auditor, must be reported to the public; and the tax expires after twenty (20) years.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9990, "fingerprint": "2000|200000186|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000186|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "64b29c00268f35d0", "measure_id": "200000186", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "1. Shall the Board of Directors of the Whitehawk Ranch Community Services District be expanded from three to five members? And further, if the measure to expand the Board is approved: 2. Election of candidates: Terms of the newly elected directors shall expire in December 2001.  Election of directors of terms expiring in December 2001, will be held in November 2001 at the regularly scheduled Uniform District election.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61, "no_votes": 11, "total_votes": 72, "percent_yes": 84.72222222222221, "percent_no": 15.277777777777786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.408648", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.990617", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "1. Shall the Board of Directors of the Whitehawk Ranch Community Services District be expanded from three to five members? And further, if the measure to expand the Board is approved: 2. Election of candidates: Terms of the newly elected directors shall expire in December 2001.  Election of directors of terms expiring in December 2001, will be held in November 2001 at the regularly scheduled Uniform District election.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9991, "fingerprint": "2000|200000419|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000419|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "0b777540b81f47dc", "measure_id": "200000419", "measure_letter": "P1", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 298, "no_votes": 459, "total_votes": 757, "percent_yes": 39.36591809775429, "percent_no": 60.63408190224571, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.409010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.990806", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12109, "fingerprint": "2000|200000420|PLUMAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000420|PLUMAS", "content_hash": "3f52e4079992a28a", "measure_id": "200000420", "measure_letter": "P2", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Plumas", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 304, "no_votes": 452, "total_votes": 756, "percent_yes": 40.21164021164021, "percent_no": 59.78835978835979, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.228013", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.409316", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.990989", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of the City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Plumas_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 9992, "fingerprint": "2000|200000071|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000071|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "5237fbcafd531c9a", "measure_id": "200000071", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Indian Wells be authorized to construct 150 senior housing units for low income and moderate income persons as required by State Law?  If approved, the development must be paid for with redevelopment funds, which can only be used to provide affordable housing.  The development shall be limited to two sites, one on the north side of Highway 111 near Mountain Cove Drive and the other between Fred Waring Drive and Hovely Lane.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1269, "no_votes": 344, "total_votes": 1613, "percent_yes": 78.67327960322382, "percent_no": 21.32672039677618, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.409608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.991170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Indian Wells be authorized to construct 150 senior housing units for low income and moderate income persons as required by State Law?  If approved, the development must be paid for with redevelopment funds, which can only be used to provide affordable housing.  The development shall be limited to two sites, one on the north side of Highway 111 near Mountain Cove Drive and the other between Fred Waring Drive and Hovely Lane.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9993, "fingerprint": "2000|200000190|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000190|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7fb0933df26b4b7a", "measure_id": "200000190", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a public safety services tax ordinance expiring June 30, 2010 be approved imposing a parcel tax on property in the City of Desert Hot Springs to fund police protection, fire protection, code enforcement and animal control services, administrative costs directly related thereto and tax collection costs, with an annual cost of living adjustment not to exceed three percent or the consumer price index, whichever is less?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1660, "no_votes": 437, "total_votes": 2097, "percent_yes": 79.16070577014783, "percent_no": 20.83929422985217, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.409888", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.991351", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a public safety services tax ordinance expiring June 30, 2010 be approved imposing a parcel tax on property in the City of Desert Hot Springs to fund police protection, fire protection, code enforcement and animal control services, administrative costs directly related thereto and tax collection costs, with an annual cost of living adjustment not to exceed three percent or the consumer price index, whichever is less?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9994, "fingerprint": "2000|200000191|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000191|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b199c20835ca0cea", "measure_id": "200000191", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should a utility users tax ordinance becoming effective on July 1, 2000 and expiring on June 30, 2005 be approved, establishing the levy and collection of a tax at the rate of 5% of utility service charges?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1653, "no_votes": 439, "total_votes": 2092, "percent_yes": 79.01529636711281, "percent_no": 20.98470363288719, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.410156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.991531", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should a utility users tax ordinance becoming effective on July 1, 2000 and expiring on June 30, 2005 be approved, establishing the levy and collection of a tax at the rate of 5% of utility service charges?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9995, "fingerprint": "2000|200000192|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000192|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "07804c7d80f86127", "measure_id": "200000192", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Shall at least two percent (2%) of the proceeds of any new voter-approved utility users tax be used only to reduce certain outstanding debt of the City of Desert Hot Springs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1562, "no_votes": 453, "total_votes": 2015, "percent_yes": 77.51861042183623, "percent_no": 22.48138957816377, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.410493", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.991713", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Shall at least two percent (2%) of the proceeds of any new voter-approved utility users tax be used only to reduce certain outstanding debt of the City of Desert Hot Springs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9996, "fingerprint": "2000|200000421|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000421|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3c4380ab3dc204a1", "measure_id": "200000421", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance Bill No. 2000-18 be adopted to levy an Admissions Tax on patrons attending entertainment events?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1425, "no_votes": 763, "total_votes": 2188, "percent_yes": 65.12797074954297, "percent_no": 34.87202925045703, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.410770", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.991893", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance Bill No. 2000-18 be adopted to levy an Admissions Tax on patrons attending entertainment events?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10000, "fingerprint": "2000|200000533|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000533|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2361a6eb0438fea8", "measure_id": "200000533", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall that area of the Alvord Unified School District (described below) be transferred to the Corona-Norco Unified School District (that territory being City of Corona, Tract #23096, McKinley Street and Mount Humphries Street, Northeast Quadrant, commonly referred to as First Impressions at Corona Hills)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72, "no_votes": 2, "total_votes": 74, "percent_yes": 97.2972972972973, "percent_no": 2.7027027027026946, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.411912", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.992626", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall that area of the Alvord Unified School District (described below) be transferred to the Corona-Norco Unified School District (that territory being City of Corona, Tract #23096, McKinley Street and Mount Humphries Street, Northeast Quadrant, commonly referred to as First Impressions at Corona Hills)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9997, "fingerprint": "2000|200000422|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000422|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3d414f728252bb12", "measure_id": "200000422", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should Mobilehome Park Rent Control in the City of Indio be repealed, as proposed in Ordinance No. 1282?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2710, "no_votes": 4547, "total_votes": 7257, "percent_yes": 37.34325478848009, "percent_no": 62.65674521151991, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.411072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.992076", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Mobilehome Park Rent Control in the City of Indio be repealed, as proposed in Ordinance No. 1282?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9998, "fingerprint": "2000|200000423|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000423|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "cf91ef12c1e5e2cf", "measure_id": "200000423", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Mobilehome Park Rent Control Ordinance of the City of Indio be amended as set forth in proposed ordinance No. 1280, to provide that mobilehome spaces which are presently subject to the Mobilehome Park Rent Control Ordinance shall be exempt from the provisions of the Mobilehome Park Rent Control Ordinance when they become vacant?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2771, "no_votes": 4400, "total_votes": 7171, "percent_yes": 38.641751499093566, "percent_no": 61.358248500906434, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.411365", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.992262", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Mobilehome Park Rent Control Ordinance of the City of Indio be amended as set forth in proposed ordinance No. 1280, to provide that mobilehome spaces which are presently subject to the Mobilehome Park Rent Control Ordinance shall be exempt from the provisions of the Mobilehome Park Rent Control Ordinance when they become vacant?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 9999, "fingerprint": "2000|200000424|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000424|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "63fe673470a909ef", "measure_id": "200000424", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Mobilehome Park Rent Control Ordinance be amended as set forth in proposed Ordinance No. 1281, to provide that mobilehome park rent control in the City of Indio only applies to tenants whose only residence is in the City of Indio and who are permanent residents of the City of Indio?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3395, "no_votes": 3798, "total_votes": 7193, "percent_yes": 47.19866536910885, "percent_no": 52.80133463089115, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.411642", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.992446", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Mobilehome Park Rent Control Ordinance be amended as set forth in proposed Ordinance No. 1281, to provide that mobilehome park rent control in the City of Indio only applies to tenants whose only residence is in the City of Indio and who are permanent residents of the City of Indio?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10001, "fingerprint": "2000|200000534|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000534|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8e807f44a83ae6b4", "measure_id": "200000534", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade classroom electrical systems for computers and modern technology, make the District eligible for State matching funds, upgrade classroom 911 emergency communications systems, smoke alarms and fire alarms, build new classrooms to relieve overcrowding, replace 20 year old deteriorating playground equipment, upgrade, and repair, rehabilitate, acquire and construct classrooms and property throughout the District, shall the Palm Springs Unified School District issue $72.5 million of bonds at the interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27612, "no_votes": 10159, "total_votes": 37771, "percent_yes": 73.10370389981732, "percent_no": 26.89629610018268, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.412237", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.992807", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade classroom electrical systems for computers and modern technology, make the District eligible for State matching funds, upgrade classroom 911 emergency communications systems, smoke alarms and fire alarms, build new classrooms to relieve overcrowding, replace 20 year old deteriorating playground equipment, upgrade, and repair, rehabilitate, acquire and construct classrooms and property throughout the District, shall the Palm Springs Unified School District issue $72.5 million of bonds at the interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10003, "fingerprint": "2000|200000135|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000135|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "0e38af7c890d9de5", "measure_id": "200000135", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding, and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 180212, "no_votes": 95473, "total_votes": 275685, "percent_yes": 65.3688086040227, "percent_no": 34.6311913959773, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.412900", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.993178", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding, and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10002, "fingerprint": "2000|200000072|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000072|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "72ad113819076da5", "measure_id": "200000072", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on August 10, 1999, by the Board of Supervisors of Sacramento County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as \"Incorporation of Elk Grove, California (5-96)\" be confirmed, including the City's sharing of its property tax and transient occupancy tax revenue with the County of Sacramento and the Tax Sharing Agreement between the City and the County of Sacramento, and including authorization, as approved by the voters through this measure, for the City to continue to levy and collect within its territory the same general taxes, fees, charges, assessments and rates as presently levied and collected by the County of Sacramento, all as more particularly described and set forth, and subject to the terms and conditions in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15454, "no_votes": 6693, "total_votes": 22147, "percent_yes": 69.77920260080373, "percent_no": 30.22079739919627, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.412621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.992991", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on August 10, 1999, by the Board of Supervisors of Sacramento County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as \"Incorporation of Elk Grove, California (5-96)\" be confirmed, including the City's sharing of its property tax and transient occupancy tax revenue with the County of Sacramento and the Tax Sharing Agreement between the City and the County of Sacramento, and including authorization, as approved by the voters through this measure, for the City to continue to levy and collect within its territory the same general taxes, fees, charges, assessments and rates as presently levied and collected by the County of Sacramento, all as more particularly described and set forth, and subject to the terms and conditions in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10004, "fingerprint": "2000|200000172|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000172|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "6b931936b67f70f8", "measure_id": "200000172", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct, renovate and repair only Folsom schools, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $38.4 million at an interest rate within the legal limit, to modernize and provide technology for classrooms and school facilities, acquire new school sites and construct school facilities in Folsom?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5063, "no_votes": 2708, "total_votes": 7771, "percent_yes": 65.15249002702355, "percent_no": 34.847509972976454, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-02", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.413171", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.993363", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, renovate and repair only Folsom schools, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $38.4 million at an interest rate within the legal limit, to modernize and provide technology for classrooms and school facilities, acquire new school sites and construct school facilities in Folsom?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10005, "fingerprint": "2000|200000255|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000255|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "46689424e20d55d1", "measure_id": "200000255", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County General Plan and Zoning Code be amended, and an ordinance adopted, allowing development of a 2000 acre \"Senior Community\" in an area known as Deer Creek Hills?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 122464, "no_votes": 272298, "total_votes": 394762, "percent_yes": 31.022236182813952, "percent_no": 68.97776381718604, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.413437", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.993547", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County General Plan and Zoning Code be amended, and an ordinance adopted, allowing development of a 2000 acre \"Senior Community\" in an area known as Deer Creek Hills?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10006, "fingerprint": "2000|200000256|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000256|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "b82a7628dfabfdc9", "measure_id": "200000256", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX.  To improve libraries by restoring evening and weekend hours; replacing outdated books and materials; expanding reading and literacy programs; and increasing computer access; shall each taxable parcel (exempting commercial, vacant, agricultural, churches and other properties) within a community facilities district encompassing unincorporated Sacramento County and the cities Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Galt and Isleton pay a special tax of $22 annually for no more than four years raising approximately $5.1 million per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 166137, "no_votes": 85570, "total_votes": 251707, "percent_yes": 66.00412384240406, "percent_no": 33.995876157595944, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.413902", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.993755", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX.  To improve libraries by restoring evening and weekend hours; replacing outdated books and materials; expanding reading and literacy programs; and increasing computer access; shall each taxable parcel (exempting commercial, vacant, agricultural, churches and other properties) within a community facilities district encompassing unincorporated Sacramento County and the cities Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Galt and Isleton pay a special tax of $22 annually for no more than four years raising approximately $5.1 million per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10011, "fingerprint": "2000|200000535|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000535|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "0e38af7c890d9de5", "measure_id": "200000535", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding, and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 230483, "no_votes": 138342, "total_votes": 368825, "percent_yes": 62.49115434148986, "percent_no": 37.50884565851014, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.415383", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.994720", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding, and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10009, "fingerprint": "2000|200000425|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000425|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "71a35f027bc98d4d", "measure_id": "200000425", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "ANNEXATION TO SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT.  Shall the territory within the city limits of the City of Galt be annexed into the Sacramento Public Library Community Facilities District No. 1996-01 for the provision of improved library services including restoration of open hours, funding for new books and updated technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4153, "no_votes": 1338, "total_votes": 5491, "percent_yes": 75.63285376069932, "percent_no": 24.36714623930068, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.414822", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.994353", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ANNEXATION TO SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT.  Shall the territory within the city limits of the City of Galt be annexed into the Sacramento Public Library Community Facilities District No. 1996-01 for the provision of improved library services including restoration of open hours, funding for new books and updated technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10007, "fingerprint": "2000|200000257|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000257|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "3eb1b8d9a6e7022d", "measure_id": "200000257", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX.  Provided the City of Galt is annexed into the Sacramento Public Library CFD, to improve libraries by restoring hours; replacing books; expanding literacy programs; and increasing computer access; shall each taxable parcel, (exempting commercial, vacant, agricultural, churches and other properties) within a community facilities district encompassing unincorporated Sacramento County and the cities Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Galt and Isleton pay a special tax of $22 annually for four years raising approximately $5.1 million per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3213, "no_votes": 2240, "total_votes": 5453, "percent_yes": 58.92169448010269, "percent_no": 41.07830551989731, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.414205", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.993958", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX.  Provided the City of Galt is annexed into the Sacramento Public Library CFD, to improve libraries by restoring hours; replacing books; expanding literacy programs; and increasing computer access; shall each taxable parcel, (exempting commercial, vacant, agricultural, churches and other properties) within a community facilities district encompassing unincorporated Sacramento County and the cities Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Galt and Isleton pay a special tax of $22 annually for four years raising approximately $5.1 million per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10010, "fingerprint": "2000|200000426|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000426|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "eb503489bfeab6e8", "measure_id": "200000426", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "ANNEXATION TO SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT.  Shall the territory within the city limits of the City of Isleton be annexed into the Sacramento Public Library Community Facilities District No. 1996-01 for the provision of improved library services including restoration of open hours, funding for new books and updated technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 248, "no_votes": 48, "total_votes": 296, "percent_yes": 83.78378378378379, "percent_no": 16.21621621621621, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.415090", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.994533", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ANNEXATION TO SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT.  Shall the territory within the city limits of the City of Isleton be annexed into the Sacramento Public Library Community Facilities District No. 1996-01 for the provision of improved library services including restoration of open hours, funding for new books and updated technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10008, "fingerprint": "2000|200000258|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000258|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "294e5d93fc309e4b", "measure_id": "200000258", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX.  Provided the City of Isleton is annexed into the Sacramento Public Library CFD, to improve libraries by restoring hours; replacing books; expanding literacy programs; and increasing computer access; shall each taxable parcel, (exempting commercial, vacant, agricultural, churches and other properties) within a community facilities district encompassing unincorporated Sacramento County and the cities Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Galt and Isleton pay a special tax of $22 annually for four years raising approximately $5.1 million per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 200, "no_votes": 91, "total_votes": 291, "percent_yes": 68.72852233676976, "percent_no": 31.271477663230243, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.414541", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.994166", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX.  Provided the City of Isleton is annexed into the Sacramento Public Library CFD, to improve libraries by restoring hours; replacing books; expanding literacy programs; and increasing computer access; shall each taxable parcel, (exempting commercial, vacant, agricultural, churches and other properties) within a community facilities district encompassing unincorporated Sacramento County and the cities Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Galt and Isleton pay a special tax of $22 annually for four years raising approximately $5.1 million per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10012, "fingerprint": "2000|200000259|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000259|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "ddb113babb00ed8e", "measure_id": "200000259", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the County of San Benito pursue a request of CalTrans to install temporary median barriers as an immediate safety improvement on Highway 25 instead of a sales tax to widen the highway to four (4) lanes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8272, "no_votes": 7600, "total_votes": 15872, "percent_yes": 52.11693548387096, "percent_no": 47.88306451612904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.415660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.994903", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the County of San Benito pursue a request of CalTrans to install temporary median barriers as an immediate safety improvement on Highway 25 instead of a sales tax to widen the highway to four (4) lanes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12113, "fingerprint": "2000|200000536|SAN BERNADINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000536|SAN BERNADINO", "content_hash": "c6997830e9868076", "measure_id": "200000536", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Lucerne Valley Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in the aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum, for the purpose of raising money for the following purposes: repair of existing classrooms; acquisition of additional classrooms; replacement of outdated heating, wiring and plumbing; and provision of greater access by students to computer technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 865, "no_votes": 702, "total_votes": 1567, "percent_yes": 55.201021059349074, "percent_no": 44.798978940650926, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.235589", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.618199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.997688", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lucerne Valley Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in the aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum, for the purpose of raising money for the following purposes: repair of existing classrooms; acquisition of additional classrooms; replacement of outdated heating, wiring and plumbing; and provision of greater access by students to computer technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12114, "fingerprint": "2000|200000537|SAN BERNADINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000537|SAN BERNADINO", "content_hash": "f4270b05c8844517", "measure_id": "200000537", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall bonds be issued that LOWER Rim of the World Unified School District taxes about one-half today's rate to modernize school facilities, build two neighborhood-based schools; construct multi-purpose rooms; improve busing schedules, alleviating traffic congestion; jointly develop, with other public agencies, a community swimming pool, playgrounds, and picnic areas?  Interest rates for the $41 million bond will remain below legal limits.  Each bond series will expire within 15 years.  A Citizens' Oversight Committee will monitor all expenditures.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6139, "no_votes": 5646, "total_votes": 11785, "percent_yes": 52.09164191769198, "percent_no": 47.90835808230802, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.235796", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.618531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.997876", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall bonds be issued that LOWER Rim of the World Unified School District taxes about one-half today's rate to modernize school facilities, build two neighborhood-based schools; construct multi-purpose rooms; improve busing schedules, alleviating traffic congestion; jointly develop, with other public agencies, a community swimming pool, playgrounds, and picnic areas?  Interest rates for the $41 million bond will remain below legal limits.  Each bond series will expire within 15 years.  A Citizens' Oversight Committee will monitor all expenditures.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12110, "fingerprint": "2000|200000260|SAN BERNADINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000260|SAN BERNADINO", "content_hash": "8d54259badf14b08", "measure_id": "200000260", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special tax be levied to fund water services and improvements within County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone L (Pinon Hills) in the maximum amount of $66.00 per year per parcel of real property within the District for a period of five (5) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 937, "no_votes": 2698, "total_votes": 3635, "percent_yes": 25.777166437414028, "percent_no": 74.22283356258598, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.234169", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.548284", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.996400", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax be levied to fund water services and improvements within County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone L (Pinon Hills) in the maximum amount of $66.00 per year per parcel of real property within the District for a period of five (5) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12111, "fingerprint": "2000|200000427|SAN BERNADINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000427|SAN BERNADINO", "content_hash": "5e1e443e91c6eec0", "measure_id": "200000427", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance that imposes a Transient Occupancy Tax of 10% on hotel and motel occupancy and providing for its administration, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10673, "no_votes": 8568, "total_votes": 19241, "percent_yes": 55.47008991216673, "percent_no": 44.52991008783327, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.234567", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.565889", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.996766", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance that imposes a Transient Occupancy Tax of 10% on hotel and motel occupancy and providing for its administration, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12112, "fingerprint": "2000|200000428|SAN BERNADINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000428|SAN BERNADINO", "content_hash": "127d9ed055c376e9", "measure_id": "200000428", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2448, increasing the special tax for emergency paramedic services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9566, "no_votes": 12834, "total_votes": 22400, "percent_yes": 42.70535714285714, "percent_no": 57.29464285714286, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.234770", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.566207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.996949", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2448, increasing the special tax for emergency paramedic services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10013, "fingerprint": "2000|200000073|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000073|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3ade0651f44f5e0a", "measure_id": "200000073", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure F", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 368 prepared and proposed by the City Council of the City of Adelanto be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 608, "no_votes": 915, "total_votes": 1523, "percent_yes": 39.92120814182534, "percent_no": 60.07879185817466, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would adopt Ordinance No", "summary_text": "This measure would adopt Ordinance No. 368 as prepared by the Adelanto City Council. The specific provisions and effects of the ordinance are not detailed in the ballot language provided.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.918023", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure F", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10014, "fingerprint": "2000|200000074|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000074|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c3363fac38caa352", "measure_id": "200000074", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure G", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall each residential unit and each business unit in the City of Montclair be charged a $2 monthly fee effective May 1, 2000 for starting and operating a paramedic program?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2364, "no_votes": 1466, "total_votes": 3830, "percent_yes": 61.72323759791123, "percent_no": 38.27676240208877, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would impose a $2 monthly fee on each residential and business u...", "summary_text": "This measure would impose a $2 monthly fee on each residential and business unit in Montclair to fund the start-up and operation of a paramedic program, effective May 1, 2000.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.918104", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure G", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10015, "fingerprint": "2000|200000153|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000153|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "5a82ee55f15330e8", "measure_id": "200000153", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure H", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Lucerne Valley Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in the aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum, for the purpose of raising money for the following purposes: repair of existing classrooms; acquisition of additional classrooms; replacement of outdated heating, wiring and plumbing; and provision of greater access by students to computer technology?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 865, "no_votes": 702, "total_votes": 1567, "percent_yes": 55.201021059349074, "percent_no": 44.798978940650926, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Lucerne Valley Unified School District to is...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Lucerne Valley Unified School District to issue $3 million in bonds to fund classroom repairs and additions, replace outdated heating/wiring/plumbing systems, and improve student access to computer technology.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure H", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10016, "fingerprint": "2000|200000154|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000154|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3b54ac1df27a8df2", "measure_id": "200000154", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure I", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall bonds be issued that LOWER Rim of the World Unified School District taxes about one-half today's rate to modernize school facilities, build two neighborhood-based schools; construct multi-purpose rooms; improve busing schedules, alleviating traffic congestion; jointly develop, with other public agencies, a community swimming pool, playgrounds, and picnic areas?  Interest rates for the $41 million bond will remain below legal limits.  Each bond series will expire within 15 years.  A Citizens' Oversight Committee will monitor all expenditures.", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6139, "no_votes": 5646, "total_votes": 11785, "percent_yes": 52.09164191769198, "percent_no": 47.90835808230802, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Education", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the issuance of $41 million in bonds by the Rim of th...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the issuance of $41 million in bonds by the Rim of the World Unified School District to modernize facilities, build two schools, construct multi-purpose rooms, improve transportation, and jointly develop community recreational facilities with other agencies. The bonds were structured to lower the district's tax rate to about half the existing rate, with each bond series expiring within 15 years and oversight provided by a citizens' committee.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure I", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10017, "fingerprint": "2000|200000174|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000174|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "542e2af7e1a9ef01", "measure_id": "200000174", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure J", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a special tax be levied to fund water services and improvements within County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone L (Pinon Hills) in the maximum amount of $66.00 per year per parcel of real property within the District for a period of five (5) years?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 937, "no_votes": 2698, "total_votes": 3635, "percent_yes": 25.777166437414028, "percent_no": 74.22283356258598, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize a special tax of up to $66 per year per parcel i...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize a special tax of up to $66 per year per parcel in the Pinon Hills area of San Bernardino County for five years to fund water services and improvements. The tax would apply to real property within County Service Area 70, Improvement Zone L.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure J", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10019, "fingerprint": "2000|200000208|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000208|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "90e0a0632e40b5b2", "measure_id": "200000208", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure K", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an ordinance that imposes a Transient Occupancy Tax of 10% on hotel and motel occupancy and providing for its administration, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10673, "no_votes": 8568, "total_votes": 19241, "percent_yes": 55.47008991216673, "percent_no": 44.52991008783327, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed a 10% transient occupancy tax on hotel and motel stays i...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed a 10% transient occupancy tax on hotel and motel stays in San Bernardino. The ordinance also established administrative procedures for collecting and managing the tax.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure K", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10018, "fingerprint": "2000|200000207|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000207|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "92880fdfeaf0590c", "measure_id": "200000207", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure L", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Ordinance No. 2448, increasing the special tax for emergency paramedic services, be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9566, "no_votes": 12834, "total_votes": 22400, "percent_yes": 42.70535714285714, "percent_no": 57.29464285714286, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Public Safety", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would adopt Ordinance No", "summary_text": "This measure would adopt Ordinance No. 2448 to increase the special tax rate for emergency paramedic services in San Bernardino. The measure would raise additional revenue specifically designated for funding paramedic emergency services.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure L", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10021, "fingerprint": "2000|200000429|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000429|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "9dc1060698bb95d8", "measure_id": "200000429", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure M", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall a new Charter be adopted for the City of San Bernadino?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11277, "no_votes": 23691, "total_votes": 34968, "percent_yes": 32.249485243651336, "percent_no": 67.75051475634866, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Governance", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have adopted a new city charter to replace San Bernardino'...", "summary_text": "This measure would have adopted a new city charter to replace San Bernardino's existing charter, which serves as the city's basic governing document that establishes the structure and powers of local government.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.918587", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure M", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10022, "fingerprint": "2000|200000430|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000430|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "9127f799e4dbfc73", "measure_id": "200000430", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure N", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to impose a general purpose utility user tax rate not to exceed 4.25%?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6522, "no_votes": 16547, "total_votes": 23069, "percent_yes": 28.271706619272617, "percent_no": 71.72829338072738, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized San Bernardino to impose a general utility...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized San Bernardino to impose a general utility user tax at a rate up to 4.25% on utility services. The tax revenue would have gone to the city's general fund for unrestricted municipal purposes.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.918666", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure N", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10023, "fingerprint": "2000|200000431|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000431|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "175493a8bd8e8b95", "measure_id": "200000431", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure O", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall Resolution No. 2000-02, Approving General Plan Amendment No. 98-108, and Adopting the Land Use Plans for Preliminary Development Plan No. 98-108 (Robinson Ranch-North) be adopted?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6507, "no_votes": 8085, "total_votes": 14592, "percent_yes": 44.59292763157895, "percent_no": 55.40707236842105, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Land Use", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.918830", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure O", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10020, "fingerprint": "2000|200000261|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000261|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "20efd18e4198dfb1", "measure_id": "200000261", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "SAN BERNADINO Measure P", "description": null, "ballot_question": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Baker Community Services District pursue special legislation to levy a transactions and use tax at a rate of 0.5 percent (1/2 cent) on taxable sales within the District boundaries?  In the event this measure is passed by a two-thirds (2/3) majority of the qualified voters within the District and that special legislation is successful, shall the proceeds of this tax be deemed general fund revenues to enhance the quality of life in Baker?", "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 52, "no_votes": 16, "total_votes": 68, "percent_yes": 76.47058823529412, "percent_no": 23.529411764705884, "passed": null, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": "Taxes & Revenue", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the Baker Community Services District to pursue ...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the Baker Community Services District to pursue special legislation to implement a 0.5% sales tax within the district boundaries, with proceeds going to the general fund to enhance quality of life in Baker if approved by a two-thirds majority and if the required special legislation is successfully enacted.", "election_type": null, "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2026-09-08T07:08:11.918912", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SAN BERNADINO Measure P", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12115, "fingerprint": "2000|200000262|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000262|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ac642bdee56ce699", "measure_id": "200000262", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CHARTER ENTITLED \"FULL DISCLOSURE IN COUNTY CONTRACTING CHARTER AMENDMENT\"  Shall the San Diego County Charter be amended to require contractors and their lobbyists to publicly disclose gifts and campaign contributions made to members of the Board of Supervisors prior to the Board's approval of service contracts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 558818, "no_votes": 257637, "total_votes": 816455, "percent_yes": 68.44443355726892, "percent_no": 31.555566442731077, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.237249", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.620685", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.999169", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CHARTER ENTITLED \"FULL DISCLOSURE IN COUNTY CONTRACTING CHARTER AMENDMENT\"  Shall the San Diego County Charter be amended to require contractors and their lobbyists to publicly disclose gifts and campaign contributions made to members of the Board of Supervisors prior to the Board's approval of service contracts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10024, "fingerprint": "2000|200000075|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000075|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c92f63bd97b743c7", "measure_id": "200000075", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of Chula Vista be amended to set the Mayor's salary at 66% of the salary of a Judge of the Superior Court and to eliminate a repetitive provision regarding the reimbursement of out-of pocket expenses incurred by Councilmembers and the Mayor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15383, "no_votes": 14957, "total_votes": 30340, "percent_yes": 50.70204350692156, "percent_no": 49.29795649307844, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.618850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.998064", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of Chula Vista be amended to set the Mayor's salary at 66% of the salary of a Judge of the Superior Court and to eliminate a repetitive provision regarding the reimbursement of out-of pocket expenses incurred by Councilmembers and the Mayor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10051, "fingerprint": "2000|200000541|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000541|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "937bd49cb1decdd7", "measure_id": "200000541", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, improve high-tech training facilities, repair classrooms, and build college buildings, by: Repairing aging classrooms; Replacing leaking roofs, aging ventilation and aging plumbing; Renovating science labs, libraries; Building new classrooms, science labs, libraries; Acquiring/improving real property; Renovating electrical systems for modern technology/Internet access; Upgrading fire security, alarms, sprinklers; shall Southwestern Community College District issue $89,354,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with annual independent audits and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64548, "no_votes": 27817, "total_votes": 92365, "percent_yes": 69.88361392302279, "percent_no": 30.116386076977207, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.628282", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.004160", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, improve high-tech training facilities, repair classrooms, and build college buildings, by: Repairing aging classrooms; Replacing leaking roofs, aging ventilation and aging plumbing; Renovating science labs, libraries; Building new classrooms, science labs, libraries; Acquiring/improving real property; Renovating electrical systems for modern technology/Internet access; Upgrading fire security, alarms, sprinklers; shall Southwestern Community College District issue $89,354,000 in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, with annual independent audits and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12116, "fingerprint": "2000|200000263|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000263|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6b3de70ae1c1b2b1", "measure_id": "200000263", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  INITIATIVE MEASURE: \"THE CLEAN CONTRACTING CHARTER AMENDMENT\"  Shall \"The Clean Contracting Charter Amendment\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 450552, "no_votes": 291582, "total_votes": 742134, "percent_yes": 60.71032994041508, "percent_no": 39.28967005958492, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.237456", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.620966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.999350", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  INITIATIVE MEASURE: \"THE CLEAN CONTRACTING CHARTER AMENDMENT\"  Shall \"The Clean Contracting Charter Amendment\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10025, "fingerprint": "2000|200000076|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000076|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "21aeedb9716ca88f", "measure_id": "200000076", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of Chula Vista be amended to give the City the option of hiring a single firm to both design and build a public works project?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17370, "no_votes": 12931, "total_votes": 30301, "percent_yes": 57.324840764331206, "percent_no": 42.675159235668794, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.619172", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.998250", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of Chula Vista be amended to give the City the option of hiring a single firm to both design and build a public works project?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10052, "fingerprint": "2000|200000542|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000542|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3ef13e68f0514c92", "measure_id": "200000542", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, repair local schools and improve safety conditions for students in the Sweetwater Union High School District, serving the communities of Bonita, Chula Vista, Imperial Beach, National City, San Ysidro and portions of San Diego, shall the District repair and upgrade school facilties, adding classrooms; improving fire alarms; removing asbestos; upgrading electrical wiring; renovating water and sewer lines; improving heating and ventilation systems; renovating restrooms; and replacing worn roofs by issuing $187 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62330, "no_votes": 23753, "total_votes": 86083, "percent_yes": 72.40686314371014, "percent_no": 27.59313685628986, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.628593", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.004342", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, repair local schools and improve safety conditions for students in the Sweetwater Union High School District, serving the communities of Bonita, Chula Vista, Imperial Beach, National City, San Ysidro and portions of San Diego, shall the District repair and upgrade school facilties, adding classrooms; improving fire alarms; removing asbestos; upgrading electrical wiring; renovating water and sewer lines; improving heating and ventilation systems; renovating restrooms; and replacing worn roofs by issuing $187 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12120, "fingerprint": "2000|200000445|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000445|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7d67b225b265498f", "measure_id": "200000445", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "MEASURE  Shall Ordinance O-18837 (New Series) be adopted amending People's Ordinance O-10960 (New Series) to: Modify existing height limitation for structures on approximately 66 acres located in San Ysidro for the International Gateway of the Americas Project, subject to City and Coastal Commission approval, provided that: No more than five acres may include structures up to 150 feet; No more than five acres may include structures up to 80 feet; On the remaining acreage, structures shall not exceed 50 feet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 232020, "no_votes": 111754, "total_votes": 343774, "percent_yes": 67.49201510294553, "percent_no": 32.50798489705447, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.240918", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.625815", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.002512", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "MEASURE  Shall Ordinance O-18837 (New Series) be adopted amending People's Ordinance O-10960 (New Series) to: Modify existing height limitation for structures on approximately 66 acres located in San Ysidro for the International Gateway of the Americas Project, subject to City and Coastal Commission approval, provided that: No more than five acres may include structures up to 150 feet; No more than five acres may include structures up to 80 feet; On the remaining acreage, structures shall not exceed 50 feet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10026, "fingerprint": "2000|200000077|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000077|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "54cb8bcec32ebd48", "measure_id": "200000077", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to establish the directly elected Mayor of the City of El Cajon as a full-time position with a salary set at $65,000 and with future increases made by City Council pursuant to California law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8160, "no_votes": 10431, "total_votes": 18591, "percent_yes": 43.89220590608358, "percent_no": 56.10779409391642, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.619460", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.998435", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to establish the directly elected Mayor of the City of El Cajon as a full-time position with a salary set at $65,000 and with future increases made by City Council pursuant to California law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12117, "fingerprint": "2000|200000432|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000432|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d57af90979feac7a", "measure_id": "200000432", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Chula Vista be amended to authorize, by a four-fifth's vote of the Council, the appointment of non-electors of the City of Chula Vista to advisory boards whose duties involve regional issues?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24165, "no_votes": 18072, "total_votes": 42237, "percent_yes": 57.21287023226081, "percent_no": 42.78712976773919, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.238270", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.622107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.000084", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Chula Vista be amended to authorize, by a four-fifth's vote of the Council, the appointment of non-electors of the City of Chula Vista to advisory boards whose duties involve regional issues?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10027, "fingerprint": "2000|200000136|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000136|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "74f1c79df262c61f", "measure_id": "200000136", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade classrooms and facilities at schools throughout the Cajon Valley Union Elementary School District, expand and improve libraries, make health and safety improvements, repair classroom fire/smoke alarm systems, build and acquire new schools to reduce overcrowding, and give students access to classroom computer technology, shall the District issue $75 million of bonds at the lowest interest rates possible so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22293, "no_votes": 11509, "total_votes": 33802, "percent_yes": 65.95171883320513, "percent_no": 34.048281166794865, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.619736", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.998620", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade classrooms and facilities at schools throughout the Cajon Valley Union Elementary School District, expand and improve libraries, make health and safety improvements, repair classroom fire/smoke alarm systems, build and acquire new schools to reduce overcrowding, and give students access to classroom computer technology, shall the District issue $75 million of bonds at the lowest interest rates possible so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12118, "fingerprint": "2000|200000433|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000433|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6146b81a97028bf6", "measure_id": "200000433", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Chula Vista be amended to permit the Mayor and Councilmembers to seek reelection without restriction as to the number of terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10372, "no_votes": 33608, "total_votes": 43980, "percent_yes": 23.58344702137335, "percent_no": 76.41655297862665, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.238476", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.622384", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.000274", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Chula Vista be amended to permit the Mayor and Councilmembers to seek reelection without restriction as to the number of terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10028, "fingerprint": "2000|200000137|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000137|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "179d5b1266644133", "measure_id": "200000137", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide Cardiff students with the education they will need to succeed in the 21st Century, shall Cardiff School District repair and modernize Cardiff schools, upgrade deteriorating roofs, electrical, plumbing, and ventilation systems, improve safety conditions, and construct a new elementary school by selling $11 million of bonds at legal interest rates in order to qualify for matching State funding, assisted by a Citizen's Committee, insuring funds are properly spent pursuant to Cardiff's facilities master plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3067, "no_votes": 724, "total_votes": 3791, "percent_yes": 80.90213663940912, "percent_no": 19.09786336059088, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.620017", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.998804", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide Cardiff students with the education they will need to succeed in the 21st Century, shall Cardiff School District repair and modernize Cardiff schools, upgrade deteriorating roofs, electrical, plumbing, and ventilation systems, improve safety conditions, and construct a new elementary school by selling $11 million of bonds at legal interest rates in order to qualify for matching State funding, assisted by a Citizen's Committee, insuring funds are properly spent pursuant to Cardiff's facilities master plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10033, "fingerprint": "2000|200000434|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000434|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "64599807f9f7ef36", "measure_id": "200000434", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Chula Vista be amended to allow the Mayor and Councilmembers to serve a maximum of three consecutive terms and to also expand from one year to three years the period a termed out incumbent must wait to seek reelection?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17784, "no_votes": 25692, "total_votes": 43476, "percent_yes": 40.905327077008, "percent_no": 59.094672922992, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.622657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.000460", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Chula Vista be amended to allow the Mayor and Councilmembers to serve a maximum of three consecutive terms and to also expand from one year to three years the period a termed out incumbent must wait to seek reelection?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12119, "fingerprint": "2000|200000435|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000435|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c3233704f4626ef1", "measure_id": "200000435", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance, an intitiative measure to direct the City Council to perform the necessary legislative actions to close Sixth Street and the adjacent public rights-of-way located between F Avenue and G Avenue to all types of traffic and transfer title to the aforesaid property to the Coronado Unified School District be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2409, "no_votes": 5926, "total_votes": 8335, "percent_yes": 28.90221955608878, "percent_no": 71.09778044391122, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.238896", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.622931", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.000649", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance, an intitiative measure to direct the City Council to perform the necessary legislative actions to close Sixth Street and the adjacent public rights-of-way located between F Avenue and G Avenue to all types of traffic and transfer title to the aforesaid property to the Coronado Unified School District be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10029, "fingerprint": "2000|200000138|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000138|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "53c24a55b8d5b99d", "measure_id": "200000138", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and renovate schools throughout the Oceanside Unified School District, give students access to classroom technology, make the district eligible for State matching funds, replace deteriorating buildings before they become safety hazards, build science labs, replace temporary classrooms not meeting current safety standards, upgrade classroom electrical, plumbing and ventilation systems, and construct and acquire new permanent classrooms and facilities, shall the District issue $125 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15996, "no_votes": 6998, "total_votes": 22994, "percent_yes": 69.56597373227798, "percent_no": 30.434026267722018, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.620411", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.998986", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and renovate schools throughout the Oceanside Unified School District, give students access to classroom technology, make the district eligible for State matching funds, replace deteriorating buildings before they become safety hazards, build science labs, replace temporary classrooms not meeting current safety standards, upgrade classroom electrical, plumbing and ventilation systems, and construct and acquire new permanent classrooms and facilities, shall the District issue $125 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10030, "fingerprint": "2000|200000264|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000264|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "77824feb8d9ae3cc", "measure_id": "200000264", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 109 - Mount Laguna be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39, "no_votes": 18, "total_votes": 57, "percent_yes": 68.42105263157895, "percent_no": 31.578947368421055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.621239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.999531", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 109 - Mount Laguna be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10034, "fingerprint": "2000|200000436|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000436|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b89651afd358d3d1", "measure_id": "200000436", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category Policy B1.7 be amended to allow conversion to resident ownership of existing mobile home parks?  (as shown on Exhibit 1)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20070, "no_votes": 9179, "total_votes": 29249, "percent_yes": 68.61773052070156, "percent_no": 31.382269479298444, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.623232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.000831", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category Policy B1.7 be amended to allow conversion to resident ownership of existing mobile home parks?  (as shown on Exhibit 1)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10031, "fingerprint": "2000|200000265|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000265|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4a3cbc963df1167d", "measure_id": "200000265", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 111 - Boulevard be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 303, "no_votes": 159, "total_votes": 462, "percent_yes": 65.5844155844156, "percent_no": 34.415584415584405, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.621510", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.999717", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 111 - Boulevard be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10035, "fingerprint": "2000|200000437|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000437|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "65a2c70ff249d309", "measure_id": "200000437", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 20 acres east of Iris Lane, west of Broadway, south of Village Road addressed as 1996, 2124 N. Iris Lane from the current designation of Suburban (up to 3.3 units per acre) to Urban I (5.5 units per acre) to increase the number of single family units allowed from 66 to 100?  (as shown on Exhibit 2)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8652, "no_votes": 21659, "total_votes": 30311, "percent_yes": 28.54409290356636, "percent_no": 71.45590709643363, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.623499", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.001015", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 20 acres east of Iris Lane, west of Broadway, south of Village Road addressed as 1996, 2124 N. Iris Lane from the current designation of Suburban (up to 3.3 units per acre) to Urban I (5.5 units per acre) to increase the number of single family units allowed from 66 to 100?  (as shown on Exhibit 2)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10032, "fingerprint": "2000|200000266|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000266|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "8b6da133a972679b", "measure_id": "200000266", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 112 - Campo be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 254, "no_votes": 131, "total_votes": 385, "percent_yes": 65.97402597402598, "percent_no": 34.02597402597402, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.621785", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:05.999903", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding structural fire protection and emergency medical services within County Service Area 112 - Campo be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10036, "fingerprint": "2000|200000438|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000438|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "cbb7bd36560b962e", "measure_id": "200000438", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 4.8 acres west of Escondido Creek, south of Harmony Grove Road, addressed as 2005 Harmony Grove Road from the current designation of Urban I (5.5 du/acre) to Light Industrial to decrease the number of single family units allowed from 26 to 0 units and to allow approximately 83,500 square feet of industrial development?  (as shown on Exhibit 3)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11200, "no_votes": 18608, "total_votes": 29808, "percent_yes": 37.57380568974772, "percent_no": 62.42619431025228, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.623845", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.001198", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 4.8 acres west of Escondido Creek, south of Harmony Grove Road, addressed as 2005 Harmony Grove Road from the current designation of Urban I (5.5 du/acre) to Light Industrial to decrease the number of single family units allowed from 26 to 0 units and to allow approximately 83,500 square feet of industrial development?  (as shown on Exhibit 3)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10037, "fingerprint": "2000|200000439|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000439|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9e44be428758c2c1", "measure_id": "200000439", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 5.3 acres south of Citracado Parkway, east and north of Interstate 15, addressed as 2258 Citracado Parkway from the current designation of Suburban to Planned Commercial to decrease the number of single family units allowed from 17 to 0 units and to allow approximately 92,000 square feet of planned commercial development?  (as shown on Exhibit 4)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14470, "no_votes": 15509, "total_votes": 29979, "percent_yes": 48.267120317555616, "percent_no": 51.732879682444384, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.624112", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.001381", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 5.3 acres south of Citracado Parkway, east and north of Interstate 15, addressed as 2258 Citracado Parkway from the current designation of Suburban to Planned Commercial to decrease the number of single family units allowed from 17 to 0 units and to allow approximately 92,000 square feet of planned commercial development?  (as shown on Exhibit 4)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10038, "fingerprint": "2000|200000440|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000440|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bff9b3dd8ca109df", "measure_id": "200000440", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 50 acres south of Stone Pointe Drive, east of Inspiration Lane, addressed as 1091 Sierra Linda Drive from the current designation of Rural II (minimum 2 acre lots) and Estate I (up to 1 unit per acre) to Estate II (up to 2 units per acre) to increase the number of single family units allowed from 20 to 52?  (as shown on Exhibit 5)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9472, "no_votes": 19654, "total_votes": 29126, "percent_yes": 32.52077181899334, "percent_no": 67.47922818100666, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.624380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.001565", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 50 acres south of Stone Pointe Drive, east of Inspiration Lane, addressed as 1091 Sierra Linda Drive from the current designation of Rural II (minimum 2 acre lots) and Estate I (up to 1 unit per acre) to Estate II (up to 2 units per acre) to increase the number of single family units allowed from 20 to 52?  (as shown on Exhibit 5)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10039, "fingerprint": "2000|200000441|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000441|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "29b19c8066984b67", "measure_id": "200000441", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 6.5 acres west of Centre City Parkway, east of Morning View Drive, north of Decatur Way, addressed as 1252 N. Centre City Parkway from the current designation of Urban II (12 units per acre) to Urban IV (24 units per acre) to increase the number of multi-family units allowed from 45 to 90?  (as shown on Exhibit 6)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8329, "no_votes": 20927, "total_votes": 29256, "percent_yes": 28.4693738036642, "percent_no": 71.5306261963358, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.624654", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.001774", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 6.5 acres west of Centre City Parkway, east of Morning View Drive, north of Decatur Way, addressed as 1252 N. Centre City Parkway from the current designation of Urban II (12 units per acre) to Urban IV (24 units per acre) to increase the number of multi-family units allowed from 45 to 90?  (as shown on Exhibit 6)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10040, "fingerprint": "2000|200000442|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000442|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e39d9157e596e777", "measure_id": "200000442", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 7.17 acres west of Escondido Creek, south of Harmony Grove Road addressed as 1839, 1901, 1909, 1919, 1925, 1929, and 1935 Harmony Grove Road from the current designation of Urban I (5.5 du/acre) to Light Industrial to decrease the number of single family units allowed from 39 to 0 units and allow approximately 124,750 square feet of industrial development?  (as shown on Exhibit 7)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10528, "no_votes": 18775, "total_votes": 29303, "percent_yes": 35.9280619731768, "percent_no": 64.0719380268232, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.624949", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.001960", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 7.17 acres west of Escondido Creek, south of Harmony Grove Road addressed as 1839, 1901, 1909, 1919, 1925, 1929, and 1935 Harmony Grove Road from the current designation of Urban I (5.5 du/acre) to Light Industrial to decrease the number of single family units allowed from 39 to 0 units and allow approximately 124,750 square feet of industrial development?  (as shown on Exhibit 7)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10041, "fingerprint": "2000|200000443|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000443|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6e681f1f914debe3", "measure_id": "200000443", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 3.66 acres north of Harmony Grove Road, east of Borra Place, addressed as 1978, 1988 Harmony Grove Road from the current designation of Urban I (5.5 units per acre) to Light Industrial to decrease the number of single family units allowed from 20 to 0 units and to allow approximately 63,700 square feet of industrial development?  (as shown on Exhibit 8)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11331, "no_votes": 17978, "total_votes": 29309, "percent_yes": 38.66047971612815, "percent_no": 61.33952028387185, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.625248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.002144", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 3.66 acres north of Harmony Grove Road, east of Borra Place, addressed as 1978, 1988 Harmony Grove Road from the current designation of Urban I (5.5 units per acre) to Light Industrial to decrease the number of single family units allowed from 20 to 0 units and to allow approximately 63,700 square feet of industrial development?  (as shown on Exhibit 8)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10042, "fingerprint": "2000|200000444|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000444|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b54b2e6e2c622e58", "measure_id": "200000444", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 7.74 acres north of Washington Avenue, east of Escondido Creek, addressed as 3022 East Washington from the current designation of Specific Planning Area #5 (allowing 2 units per acre) to allow up to 5.5 units per acre on 7,000 square foot minimum lots to increase the number of single family units allowed from 15 to approximately 40?  (as shown on Exhibit 9)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8062, "no_votes": 21627, "total_votes": 29689, "percent_yes": 27.15483849237091, "percent_no": 72.84516150762909, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.625544", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.002328", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Escondido General Plan land use category be amended for 7.74 acres north of Washington Avenue, east of Escondido Creek, addressed as 3022 East Washington from the current designation of Specific Planning Area #5 (allowing 2 units per acre) to allow up to 5.5 units per acre on 7,000 square foot minimum lots to increase the number of single family units allowed from 15 to approximately 40?  (as shown on Exhibit 9)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10043, "fingerprint": "2000|200000446|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000446|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ff3dacae579b66da", "measure_id": "200000446", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the CHARTER of the City of San Marcos be amended to add the following new Section 501 to existing Article V - General Laws?  \"Section 501.  Land Use, Planning & Soning Matters.  Notwithstanding its Charter city status, the City shall be governed by State law as it applies to general law cities with respect to the application, interpretation and enforcement of land use, planning and zoning matters, including, but not limited to, the requirement of consistency between the General Plan of the City and the terms of its zoning ordinances.\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9409, "no_votes": 4907, "total_votes": 14316, "percent_yes": 65.7236658284437, "percent_no": 34.2763341715563, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.626084", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.002699", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the CHARTER of the City of San Marcos be amended to add the following new Section 501 to existing Article V - General Laws?  \"Section 501.  Land Use, Planning & Soning Matters.  Notwithstanding its Charter city status, the City shall be governed by State law as it applies to general law cities with respect to the application, interpretation and enforcement of land use, planning and zoning matters, including, but not limited to, the requirement of consistency between the General Plan of the City and the terms of its zoning ordinances.\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10045, "fingerprint": "2000|200000448|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000448|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1bef60ed2edf5c87", "measure_id": "200000448", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the people adopt an initiative measure, also known as the \"Community Protection Act\", to require voter approval to change, alter or increase General Plan Land Use categories, with the exception of changes to land already designated residential that clearly result in a reduction in intensity or density?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3820, "no_votes": 2328, "total_votes": 6148, "percent_yes": 62.134027325959664, "percent_no": 37.865972674040336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.626614", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.003066", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the people adopt an initiative measure, also known as the \"Community Protection Act\", to require voter approval to change, alter or increase General Plan Land Use categories, with the exception of changes to land already designated residential that clearly result in a reduction in intensity or density?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10044, "fingerprint": "2000|200000447|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000447|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "fd1bb2877fa76212", "measure_id": "200000447", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending Section 3.16.030(a) of the Santee Municipal Code to set a maximum rate of fifteen percent for the City's transient occupancy tax be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8130, "no_votes": 10074, "total_votes": 18204, "percent_yes": 44.66051417270929, "percent_no": 55.33948582729071, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.626349", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.002887", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending Section 3.16.030(a) of the Santee Municipal Code to set a maximum rate of fifteen percent for the City's transient occupancy tax be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10046, "fingerprint": "2000|200000449|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000449|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "d79246ff220e1160", "measure_id": "200000449", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"Good Government and Fair Elections\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12057, "no_votes": 6892, "total_votes": 18949, "percent_yes": 63.62868752968495, "percent_no": 36.37131247031505, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.626882", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.003247", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"Good Government and Fair Elections\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10047, "fingerprint": "2000|200000450|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000450|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6412fab2c167d4e6", "measure_id": "200000450", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"The Vista Taxpayer Protection Amendment of 2000\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11091, "no_votes": 7814, "total_votes": 18905, "percent_yes": 58.66701930706162, "percent_no": 41.33298069293838, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.627147", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.003425", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance entitled \"The Vista Taxpayer Protection Amendment of 2000\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10048, "fingerprint": "2000|200000538|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000538|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "74f1c79df262c61f", "measure_id": "200000538", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade classrooms and facilities at schools throughout the Cajon Valley Union Elementary School District, expand and improve libraries, make health and safety improvements, repair classroom fire/smoke alarm systems, build and acquire new schools to reduce overcrowding, and give students access to classroom computer technology, shall the District issue $75 million of bonds at the lowest interest rates possible so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 31379, "no_votes": 14281, "total_votes": 45660, "percent_yes": 68.72317126587824, "percent_no": 31.276828734121764, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.627443", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.003605", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade classrooms and facilities at schools throughout the Cajon Valley Union Elementary School District, expand and improve libraries, make health and safety improvements, repair classroom fire/smoke alarm systems, build and acquire new schools to reduce overcrowding, and give students access to classroom computer technology, shall the District issue $75 million of bonds at the lowest interest rates possible so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10049, "fingerprint": "2000|200000539|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000539|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e0cbe0c3a369a511", "measure_id": "200000539", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Classrooms to Meet Our Children's Needs.  Relieve overcrowding and repair aging neighborhood schools by: Replacing aging roofs; Building new schools, classrooms and libraries; Replacing worn-out heating, plumbing and electrical systems; Replacing outdated wiring to handle today's technology; Continue class-size reduction; Acquiring land to build new schools; Shall Poway Unified School District SFID No. 2000-1 issue $156 million in bonds at legal interest rates with Taxpayer Safeguards including: an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee, Annual Audit and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34001, "no_votes": 20031, "total_votes": 54032, "percent_yes": 62.92752442996743, "percent_no": 37.07247557003257, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.627740", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.003791", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Classrooms to Meet Our Children's Needs.  Relieve overcrowding and repair aging neighborhood schools by: Replacing aging roofs; Building new schools, classrooms and libraries; Replacing worn-out heating, plumbing and electrical systems; Replacing outdated wiring to handle today's technology; Continue class-size reduction; Acquiring land to build new schools; Shall Poway Unified School District SFID No. 2000-1 issue $156 million in bonds at legal interest rates with Taxpayer Safeguards including: an Independent Citizens Oversight Committee, Annual Audit and NO money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10050, "fingerprint": "2000|200000540|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000540|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f8587127a0a2796d", "measure_id": "200000540", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve and refurbish existing classrooms and playground areas, satisfy health and safety needs, wire schools for computer technology, expand and enhance school libraries, bring facilities into compliance with ADA access regulations, replace and repair outdated infrastructure of existing school facilities, and fund the acquisition and construction of classrooms and facilities at existing school sites, shall the Santee School District Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue $28,000,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11872, "no_votes": 7049, "total_votes": 18921, "percent_yes": 62.74509803921568, "percent_no": 37.25490196078432, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.628014", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.003976", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve and refurbish existing classrooms and playground areas, satisfy health and safety needs, wire schools for computer technology, expand and enhance school libraries, bring facilities into compliance with ADA access regulations, replace and repair outdated infrastructure of existing school facilities, and fund the acquisition and construction of classrooms and facilities at existing school sites, shall the Santee School District Improvement District No. 1 be authorized to issue $28,000,000 of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12121, "fingerprint": "2000|200000267|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000267|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "54a2579643b063dc", "measure_id": "200000267", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "BRANCH LIBRARY FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT BONDS, 2000.  Shall the City incur $105,865,000 of bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, renovation, and construction of branch libraries and other library facilities, other than the Main Library, and all other works, property and structures necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 218378, "no_votes": 75285, "total_votes": 293663, "percent_yes": 74.36347105355459, "percent_no": 25.63652894644541, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.246906", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.630655", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.005615", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "BRANCH LIBRARY FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT BONDS, 2000.  Shall the City incur $105,865,000 of bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, renovation, and construction of branch libraries and other library facilities, other than the Main Library, and all other works, property and structures necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10053, "fingerprint": "2000|200000016|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000016|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "b4238bf5a881050a", "measure_id": "200000016", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION AND PARK FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT BONDS, 2000.  Shall the City and County incur $110,000,000 of bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and reconstruction of recreation and park facilities and properties, and all other works, property and structures necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 144474, "no_votes": 38885, "total_votes": 183359, "percent_yes": 78.7929689843422, "percent_no": 21.207031015657805, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.628932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.004524", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION AND PARK FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT BONDS, 2000.  Shall the City and County incur $110,000,000 of bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and reconstruction of recreation and park facilities and properties, and all other works, property and structures necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12122, "fingerprint": "2000|200000268|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000268|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a62dca8185daefdf", "measure_id": "200000268", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City allow each member of the Board of Supervisors to hire a third aide?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108509, "no_votes": 181033, "total_votes": 289542, "percent_yes": 37.47608291715882, "percent_no": 62.52391708284118, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.247215", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.630932", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.005802", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City allow each member of the Board of Supervisors to hire a third aide?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10054, "fingerprint": "2000|200000017|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000017|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d0ff1057a1993afa", "measure_id": "200000017", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES IMPROVEMENT BONDS, 2000.  Shall the City and County incur $87,445,000 of bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and/or reconstruction of certain improvements to the California Academy of Sciences, and all other works, property and structures necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 122722, "no_votes": 60368, "total_votes": 183090, "percent_yes": 67.02823747883555, "percent_no": 32.97176252116445, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.629206", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.004705", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES IMPROVEMENT BONDS, 2000.  Shall the City and County incur $87,445,000 of bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and/or reconstruction of certain improvements to the California Academy of Sciences, and all other works, property and structures necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12123, "fingerprint": "2000|200000269|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000269|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6abb1e5f283fc92e", "measure_id": "200000269", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase retirement benefits for miscellaneous employees hired after 1976?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 171682, "no_votes": 113824, "total_votes": 285506, "percent_yes": 60.1325366191954, "percent_no": 39.8674633808046, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.247513", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.631198", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.005984", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase retirement benefits for miscellaneous employees hired after 1976?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10055, "fingerprint": "2000|200000018|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000018|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "af17522e00561523", "measure_id": "200000018", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City extend the Open Space Fund for 30 years, add new planning and budgeting requirements, and authorize the Board of Supervisors to issue revenue bonds secured by the Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126478, "no_votes": 44993, "total_votes": 171471, "percent_yes": 73.76057759037971, "percent_no": 26.23942240962029, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Revenue Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.629484", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.004888", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City extend the Open Space Fund for 30 years, add new planning and budgeting requirements, and authorize the Board of Supervisors to issue revenue bonds secured by the Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12124, "fingerprint": "2000|200000270|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000270|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "abb92239b5cb29fd", "measure_id": "200000270", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City extend the Children's Fund until 2016, increase the annual set-aside of property tax revenues for the Fund, create a citizen advisory committee, and add new planning requirements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 206546, "no_votes": 75959, "total_votes": 282505, "percent_yes": 73.11233429496824, "percent_no": 26.887665705031765, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.247820", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.631460", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.006164", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City extend the Children's Fund until 2016, increase the annual set-aside of property tax revenues for the Fund, create a citizen advisory committee, and add new planning requirements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10056, "fingerprint": "2000|200000019|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000019|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "16d5df4b0b773d19", "measure_id": "200000019", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall members of the Board of Supevisors be added to the City's Employee Retirement System and shall the City be authorized to pay the full cost of health benefits for Board members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 88671, "no_votes": 86851, "total_votes": 175522, "percent_yes": 50.51845352719317, "percent_no": 49.48154647280683, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.629768", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.005069", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the Board of Supevisors be added to the City's Employee Retirement System and shall the City be authorized to pay the full cost of health benefits for Board members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12125, "fingerprint": "2000|200000271|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000271|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2b3b1cabd76d60cc", "measure_id": "200000271", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase health benefits for retired City employees by placing a cap on monthly health care premium costs, and paying one-half the cost of health coverage for the retiree's primary dependent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 159161, "no_votes": 121184, "total_votes": 280345, "percent_yes": 56.77326151705934, "percent_no": 43.22673848294066, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.248112", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.631734", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.006343", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase health benefits for retired City employees by placing a cap on monthly health care premium costs, and paying one-half the cost of health coverage for the retiree's primary dependent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10057, "fingerprint": "2000|200000020|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000020|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6b3a7820705d70b7", "measure_id": "200000020", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City limit cash payments for certain public assistance programs to 15 percent of total benefits, add to the residency and fingerprint requirements, and increase the penalties for fraud?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72735, "no_votes": 102946, "total_votes": 175681, "percent_yes": 41.40174520864521, "percent_no": 58.59825479135479, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.630085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.005252", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City limit cash payments for certain public assistance programs to 15 percent of total benefits, add to the residency and fingerprint requirements, and increase the penalties for fraud?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12126, "fingerprint": "2000|200000272|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000272|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "cff1039dbddb080b", "measure_id": "200000272", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City close John F. Kennedy Drive in Golden Gate Park to automobile traffic on Saturdays?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 132986, "no_votes": 162079, "total_votes": 295065, "percent_yes": 45.07006930676291, "percent_no": 54.92993069323709, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.248495", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.632014", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.006526", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City close John F. Kennedy Drive in Golden Gate Park to automobile traffic on Saturdays?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10058, "fingerprint": "2000|200000021|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000021|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "88889316f0e1a491", "measure_id": "200000021", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to waive taxes on certain residential property and on small businesses in Bayview Hunters Point for five years, and to appropriate $150 million to create jobs for residents of the neighborhood?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66008, "no_votes": 109601, "total_votes": 175609, "percent_yes": 37.58805072632951, "percent_no": 62.41194927367049, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.630384", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.005436", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to waive taxes on certain residential property and on small businesses in Bayview Hunters Point for five years, and to appropriate $150 million to create jobs for residents of the neighborhood?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10059, "fingerprint": "2000|200000273|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000273|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "14bc93c175d9c799", "measure_id": "200000273", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City close John F. Kennedy Drive in Golden Gate Park to automobile traffic on Saturdays after the Music Concourse parking facility is opened?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108901, "no_votes": 176678, "total_votes": 285579, "percent_yes": 38.13340616782046, "percent_no": 61.86659383217954, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.632278", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.006711", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City close John F. Kennedy Drive in Golden Gate Park to automobile traffic on Saturdays after the Music Concourse parking facility is opened?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10060, "fingerprint": "2000|200000274|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000274|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "aa2d8c351bd988a3", "measure_id": "200000274", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City's Rent Control Ordinance be amended to limit the type of costs on which a landlord may base a rent increase?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 168888, "no_votes": 125642, "total_votes": 294530, "percent_yes": 57.34152717889519, "percent_no": 42.65847282110481, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.632543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.006891", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's Rent Control Ordinance be amended to limit the type of costs on which a landlord may base a rent increase?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10061, "fingerprint": "2000|200000275|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000275|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "77faf13ffa069522", "measure_id": "200000275", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City eliminate the gross receipts method of calculating the business tax and raise the existing payroll expense tax rate from 1.5 to 1.7 percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95958, "no_votes": 168536, "total_votes": 264494, "percent_yes": 36.27983999637043, "percent_no": 63.72016000362957, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.632890", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.007077", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City eliminate the gross receipts method of calculating the business tax and raise the existing payroll expense tax rate from 1.5 to 1.7 percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10062, "fingerprint": "2000|200000276|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000276|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f07934415810fd54", "measure_id": "200000276", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City ban officials from accepting gifts, payments, or campaign contributions from a person or group if the official previously approved granting the donor a contract or special benefit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 234787, "no_votes": 49274, "total_votes": 284061, "percent_yes": 82.65372578425057, "percent_no": 17.346274215749432, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.633281", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.007260", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City ban officials from accepting gifts, payments, or campaign contributions from a person or group if the official previously approved granting the donor a contract or special benefit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10063, "fingerprint": "2000|200000277|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000277|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a40ca671d187a0d2", "measure_id": "200000277", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City adopt new controls on office development, including office space for computer-based services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 111006, "no_votes": 171881, "total_votes": 282887, "percent_yes": 39.24040341196308, "percent_no": 60.75959658803692, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.633601", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.007445", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City adopt new controls on office development, including office space for computer-based services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10064, "fingerprint": "2000|200000278|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000278|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f600e398520d0a80", "measure_id": "200000278", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City adopt new controls on office development, including office space for computer-based services, and live/work units?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 141434, "no_votes": 142749, "total_votes": 284183, "percent_yes": 49.76863499927863, "percent_no": 50.23136500072137, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.633881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.007629", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City adopt new controls on office development, including office space for computer-based services, and live/work units?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10065, "fingerprint": "2000|200000279|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000279|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "bd3a928d8f7b0349", "measure_id": "200000279", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall City law be amended to authorize issuance of restricted taxicab permits in the names of one or more persons, and to set a full-time driving or operating requirement for permit-holders at 800 hours per year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 103166, "no_votes": 169065, "total_votes": 272231, "percent_yes": 37.89649231718651, "percent_no": 62.10350768281349, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.634157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.007814", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City law be amended to authorize issuance of restricted taxicab permits in the names of one or more persons, and to set a full-time driving or operating requirement for permit-holders at 800 hours per year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10066, "fingerprint": "2000|200000280|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000280|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6c523fda84b78ed3", "measure_id": "200000280", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the rules that govern converting rental housing to condominiums also apply to converting rental housing to certain forms of joint ownership with exclusive rights of occupancy, and shall the annual 200-unit cap on such conversions be made permanent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126055, "no_votes": 148235, "total_votes": 274290, "percent_yes": 45.95683400780196, "percent_no": 54.04316599219804, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.634431", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.008000", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the rules that govern converting rental housing to condominiums also apply to converting rental housing to certain forms of joint ownership with exclusive rights of occupancy, and shall the annual 200-unit cap on such conversions be made permanent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10067, "fingerprint": "2000|200000281|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000281|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6c3f661fbe21b465", "measure_id": "200000281", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City provide public financing to candidates for the Board of Supervisors, limit contributions to independent committees, and limit the overall amount a person or group may contribute to all City candidates and political committees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143881, "no_votes": 129423, "total_votes": 273304, "percent_yes": 52.64503995550742, "percent_no": 47.35496004449258, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.634702", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.008180", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City provide public financing to candidates for the Board of Supervisors, limit contributions to independent committees, and limit the overall amount a person or group may contribute to all City candidates and political committees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10068, "fingerprint": "2000|200000282|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000282|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f673be5138a45cea", "measure_id": "200000282", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to support a full clean-up by the Navy of the Hunters Point Shipyard, to allow unrestricted use of the entire site in the future?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 241456, "no_votes": 38095, "total_votes": 279551, "percent_yes": 86.37279065358379, "percent_no": 13.627209346416208, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.634996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.008360", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to support a full clean-up by the Navy of the Hunters Point Shipyard, to allow unrestricted use of the entire site in the future?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10069, "fingerprint": "2000|200000283|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000283|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "9dd8601014d8650d", "measure_id": "200000283", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to establish a Pedestrian Safety Fund to pay for improvements designed to make City streets safer for pedestrians?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 189549, "no_votes": 93806, "total_votes": 283355, "percent_yes": 66.89453159464276, "percent_no": 33.10546840535724, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.635266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.008538", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to establish a Pedestrian Safety Fund to pay for improvements designed to make City streets safer for pedestrians?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10070, "fingerprint": "2000|200000284|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000284|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "103ee0614b2d619b", "measure_id": "200000284", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to use Pier 45 as the site for a public educational facility focusing on the San Francisco Bay and operated by an independent non-profit organization?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 201595, "no_votes": 76167, "total_votes": 277762, "percent_yes": 72.57832244871508, "percent_no": 27.421677551284915, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.635562", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.008719", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to use Pier 45 as the site for a public educational facility focusing on the San Francisco Bay and operated by an independent non-profit organization?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10081, "fingerprint": "2000|200000453|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000453|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "2f0ff8b6edc684e8", "measure_id": "200000453", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The City of Tracy's Growth Management Ordinance places an annual limit on residential building permits which may be issued in any year (1,500 maximum and 1,200 average).  Measure A would amend the Growth Management Ordinance by reducing the annual limit on residential building permits which may be issued in any year (750 maximum and 600 average).  Shall Measure A be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9631, "no_votes": 7522, "total_votes": 17153, "percent_yes": 56.14761266250802, "percent_no": 43.85238733749198, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.639020", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.010844", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The City of Tracy's Growth Management Ordinance places an annual limit on residential building permits which may be issued in any year (1,500 maximum and 1,200 average).  Measure A would amend the Growth Management Ordinance by reducing the annual limit on residential building permits which may be issued in any year (750 maximum and 600 average).  Shall Measure A be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10079, "fingerprint": "2000|200000451|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000451|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "7935190adcc7b83a", "measure_id": "200000451", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure D, which 1) amends the \"theme park first\" provision of the West Lathrop Specific Plan and development agreement to allow occupancy of housing before construction of a theme park; and 2) requires the City to withhold occupancy permits until construction of the theme park or equivalent commercial development is guaranteed, or an Economic Development Fee is paid into a fund to provide similar economic and social benefits, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1511, "no_votes": 1209, "total_votes": 2720, "percent_yes": 55.5514705882353, "percent_no": 44.4485294117647, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.638386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.010476", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure D, which 1) amends the \"theme park first\" provision of the West Lathrop Specific Plan and development agreement to allow occupancy of housing before construction of a theme park; and 2) requires the City to withhold occupancy permits until construction of the theme park or equivalent commercial development is guaranteed, or an Economic Development Fee is paid into a fund to provide similar economic and social benefits, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10082, "fingerprint": "2000|200000543|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000543|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c1c5641e9b5d8abf", "measure_id": "200000543", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the members of the Lincoln Unified School District Board of Trustees be limited to two (2) terms of office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9175, "no_votes": 5810, "total_votes": 14985, "percent_yes": 61.22789456122789, "percent_no": 38.77210543877211, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.639293", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.011024", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the members of the Lincoln Unified School District Board of Trustees be limited to two (2) terms of office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10083, "fingerprint": "2000|200000544|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000544|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "1a3a5a4d5adf9fb1", "measure_id": "200000544", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, rehabilitate aging schools, and improve safety conditions for students, shall Stockton Unified School District upgrade school facilities by acquiring land and constructing new schools; renovating existing classrooms, science and computer labs; upgrading inadequate electrical, roofing, ventilation and plumbing systems; and meeting health, safety and accessibility standards; issuing $80,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, and establishing a Citizens' Oversight Committee to ensure funds are spent properly?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32900, "no_votes": 9935, "total_votes": 42835, "percent_yes": 76.80634994747287, "percent_no": 23.193650052527133, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.639575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.011203", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, rehabilitate aging schools, and improve safety conditions for students, shall Stockton Unified School District upgrade school facilities by acquiring land and constructing new schools; renovating existing classrooms, science and computer labs; upgrading inadequate electrical, roofing, ventilation and plumbing systems; and meeting health, safety and accessibility standards; issuing $80,000,000 in bonds at interest rates within legal limits, and establishing a Citizens' Oversight Committee to ensure funds are spent properly?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10076, "fingerprint": "2000|200000140|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000140|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "5623380446ec5681", "measure_id": "200000140", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the members of the Stockton Unified School District Board of Trustees be limited to two (2) terms of office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20252, "no_votes": 7887, "total_votes": 28139, "percent_yes": 71.97128540459859, "percent_no": 28.02871459540141, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.637465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.009902", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the members of the Stockton Unified School District Board of Trustees be limited to two (2) terms of office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10075, "fingerprint": "2000|200000139|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000139|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "9d7f5bf811746a0b", "measure_id": "200000139", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and renovate every school in the Manteca Unified School District, make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, build new elementary school classrooms, repair and upgrade air-conditioning/heating systems, upgrade outdated computer labs, improve school security systems, build and acquire new educational facilities, shall the District issue $40 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10537, "no_votes": 5552, "total_votes": 16089, "percent_yes": 65.49195102243769, "percent_no": 34.50804897756231, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.637196", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.009639", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and renovate every school in the Manteca Unified School District, make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, build new elementary school classrooms, repair and upgrade air-conditioning/heating systems, upgrade outdated computer labs, improve school security systems, build and acquire new educational facilities, shall the District issue $40 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by a citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10074, "fingerprint": "2000|200000081|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000081|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c8183a38d2d648f3", "measure_id": "200000081", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The current Growth Management Ordinance (\"GMO\") places an annual limit on residential building permits (1,500 maximum and 1,200 average) and requires that the City determine public facilities and services are available prior to issuance of a permit.  Measure \"T\" would repeal and replace the GMO with an ordinance that places an annual maximum (750) and average (600) limit on permits and authorizes the City to establish new implementing guidelines.  Shall Measure \"T\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5639, "no_votes": 5929, "total_votes": 11568, "percent_yes": 48.74654218533886, "percent_no": 51.25345781466114, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.636921", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.009453", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The current Growth Management Ordinance (\"GMO\") places an annual limit on residential building permits (1,500 maximum and 1,200 average) and requires that the City determine public facilities and services are available prior to issuance of a permit.  Measure \"T\" would repeal and replace the GMO with an ordinance that places an annual maximum (750) and average (600) limit on permits and authorizes the City to establish new implementing guidelines.  Shall Measure \"T\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10071, "fingerprint": "2000|200000078|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000078|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "ade9557d904737d8", "measure_id": "200000078", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Approval of City of Stockton Charter Amendments relating to redefining the role and responsibilities of the position of Mayor of the City of Stockton, effective January 1, 2001.  Shall the Charter of the City of Stockton be amended to: (1) Redefine the role and responsibilities of the position of Mayor of the City of Stockton as it relates to the Council/Manager form of government by giving the Mayor the authority to direct the City's Public Information Office; propose direction and goals that the annual budget would be built around; nominate the City Manager subject to confirmation by the City Council.  AND (2) Establish a commission for setting the salaries for City elected officials.  AND (3) Expand the audit duties of the City Auditor?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22378, "no_votes": 17322, "total_votes": 39700, "percent_yes": 56.36775818639799, "percent_no": 43.63224181360201, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.635952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.008899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approval of City of Stockton Charter Amendments relating to redefining the role and responsibilities of the position of Mayor of the City of Stockton, effective January 1, 2001.  Shall the Charter of the City of Stockton be amended to: (1) Redefine the role and responsibilities of the position of Mayor of the City of Stockton as it relates to the Council/Manager form of government by giving the Mayor the authority to direct the City's Public Information Office; propose direction and goals that the annual budget would be built around; nominate the City Manager subject to confirmation by the City Council.  AND (2) Establish a commission for setting the salaries for City elected officials.  AND (3) Expand the audit duties of the City Auditor?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10072, "fingerprint": "2000|200000079|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000079|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "b595e7043878b1b9", "measure_id": "200000079", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Approval of that Ordinance No. 021-99 C.S. adopted by the Stockton City Council on November 23, 1999, relating to increasing by one percent (1%) the City of Stockton Transient Occupancy Tax.  Shall Ordinance No. 021-99 C.S. adopted by the Stockton City Council on November 23, 1999, be approved to authorize a one percent (1%) increase, from the current eight percent (8%), to nine percent (9%) in the City of Stockton's Transient Occupancy Tax charged by the operators of a hotel, motel, inn, or similar structure to persons who use the same for dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes for a period of 30 days or less?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17117, "no_votes": 21021, "total_votes": 38138, "percent_yes": 44.88174524096701, "percent_no": 55.11825475903299, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.636312", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.009086", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approval of that Ordinance No. 021-99 C.S. adopted by the Stockton City Council on November 23, 1999, relating to increasing by one percent (1%) the City of Stockton Transient Occupancy Tax.  Shall Ordinance No. 021-99 C.S. adopted by the Stockton City Council on November 23, 1999, be approved to authorize a one percent (1%) increase, from the current eight percent (8%), to nine percent (9%) in the City of Stockton's Transient Occupancy Tax charged by the operators of a hotel, motel, inn, or similar structure to persons who use the same for dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes for a period of 30 days or less?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10073, "fingerprint": "2000|200000080|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000080|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c70e38d6b0b684d6", "measure_id": "200000080", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Low Rent Housing Projects Measure.  Without increasing local taxes, by utilizing federal or state funding, shall public or publicly assisted houing providers, within the City of Stockton, according to the City's General Plan, construct, develop, acquire, rehabilitate and/or convert housing project(s) into decent, safe, sanitary and uncrowded units for low-income, elderly, or handicapped persons, up to 500 units annually, for ten years, with any unused units carried over annually?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27838, "no_votes": 11056, "total_votes": 38894, "percent_yes": 71.57402170000515, "percent_no": 28.425978299994853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.636609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.009268", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Low Rent Housing Projects Measure.  Without increasing local taxes, by utilizing federal or state funding, shall public or publicly assisted houing providers, within the City of Stockton, according to the City's General Plan, construct, develop, acquire, rehabilitate and/or convert housing project(s) into decent, safe, sanitary and uncrowded units for low-income, elderly, or handicapped persons, up to 500 units annually, for ten years, with any unused units carried over annually?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10077, "fingerprint": "2000|200000227|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000227|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "770542769de715fd", "measure_id": "200000227", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Tracy Unified School District be authorized to issue $23,500,000 in bonds for School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Unified Service Area) bearing interest at rates within the legal limit, to finance acquisition, improvements, repair and expansion of K-12 facilities at schools constructed from 1939 to 1989, including masterplan improvements at each school such as for health, safety, technology, class-size reduction and related projects, and to qualify for $6,300,000 in matching State facility grants, and should a Citizens' Oversight Committee be formed to review all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2210, "no_votes": 1343, "total_votes": 3553, "percent_yes": 62.20095693779905, "percent_no": 37.79904306220095, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-09-26", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.637842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.010106", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Tracy Unified School District be authorized to issue $23,500,000 in bonds for School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Unified Service Area) bearing interest at rates within the legal limit, to finance acquisition, improvements, repair and expansion of K-12 facilities at schools constructed from 1939 to 1989, including masterplan improvements at each school such as for health, safety, technology, class-size reduction and related projects, and to qualify for $6,300,000 in matching State facility grants, and should a Citizens' Oversight Committee be formed to review all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10078, "fingerprint": "2000|200000228|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000228|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "b1ae7b63e4ab1cd2", "measure_id": "200000228", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Tracy Unified School District be authorized to issue $5,450,000 in bonds for School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (High School Service Area) bearing interest at rates within the legal limit, to finance acquisition, improvements, repair and expansion of high school facilities at schools constructed from 1939 to 1989, including masterplan improvements at each school such as for health, safety, technology, class-size reduction and related projects, and to qualify for $1,800,000 in matching State facility grants, and should a Citizens' Oversight Committee be formed to review all expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 722, "no_votes": 434, "total_votes": 1156, "percent_yes": 62.45674740484429, "percent_no": 37.54325259515571, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-09-26", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.638116", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.010293", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Tracy Unified School District be authorized to issue $5,450,000 in bonds for School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 (High School Service Area) bearing interest at rates within the legal limit, to finance acquisition, improvements, repair and expansion of high school facilities at schools constructed from 1939 to 1989, including masterplan improvements at each school such as for health, safety, technology, class-size reduction and related projects, and to qualify for $1,800,000 in matching State facility grants, and should a Citizens' Oversight Committee be formed to review all expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10080, "fingerprint": "2000|200000452|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000452|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "74009cb30f9f7de0", "measure_id": "200000452", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 019-00 C.S. ADOPTED BY THE STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 27, 2000, RELATED TO INCREASING BY ONE PERCENT (1%) THE CITY OF STOCKTON HOTEL/MOTEL GUEST TAX.  Shall Ordinance No. 019-00 C.S. adopted by the Stockton City Council on June 27, 2000 be approved to authorize a one percent (1%) increase, from the current eight percent (8%), to nine percent (9%), in the City of Stockton's Hotel/Motel Guest Tax charged by the operators of a hotel, motel, inn, or similar structure to persons who use the same for dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes for a period of 30 days or less?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27310, "no_votes": 30667, "total_votes": 57977, "percent_yes": 47.10488642047709, "percent_no": 52.89511357952291, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.638657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.010660", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 019-00 C.S. ADOPTED BY THE STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 27, 2000, RELATED TO INCREASING BY ONE PERCENT (1%) THE CITY OF STOCKTON HOTEL/MOTEL GUEST TAX.  Shall Ordinance No. 019-00 C.S. adopted by the Stockton City Council on June 27, 2000 be approved to authorize a one percent (1%) increase, from the current eight percent (8%), to nine percent (9%), in the City of Stockton's Hotel/Motel Guest Tax charged by the operators of a hotel, motel, inn, or similar structure to persons who use the same for dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes for a period of 30 days or less?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10084, "fingerprint": "2000|200000022|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000022|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "4d3e3f8c8d28bf6d", "measure_id": "200000022", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the County Board of Supervisors recognize the Diablo Canyon Lands as an exceptionally precious coastal resource by adopting policies that promote habitat preservation, sustainable agricultural activities, and public use and enjoyment consistent with public safety and property rights once the lands are no longer needed as an emergency buffer for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant after its remaining operating life?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58624, "no_votes": 19778, "total_votes": 78402, "percent_yes": 74.77360271421647, "percent_no": 25.226397285783534, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.639851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.011385", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the County Board of Supervisors recognize the Diablo Canyon Lands as an exceptionally precious coastal resource by adopting policies that promote habitat preservation, sustainable agricultural activities, and public use and enjoyment consistent with public safety and property rights once the lands are no longer needed as an emergency buffer for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant after its remaining operating life?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10089, "fingerprint": "2000|200000141|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000141|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "7489379c6d46ad53", "measure_id": "200000141", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Atascadero Unified School District Yes or No?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6433, "no_votes": 5263, "total_votes": 11696, "percent_yes": 55.00170998632012, "percent_no": 44.99829001367988, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.641473", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.012301", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Atascadero Unified School District Yes or No?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10085, "fingerprint": "2000|200000023|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000023|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "652ee677cb4ca0fd", "measure_id": "200000023", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000-2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within County Service Area No. 23, to provide drainage services within said Area, with the special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 151, "no_votes": 299, "total_votes": 450, "percent_yes": 33.55555555555555, "percent_no": 66.44444444444446, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.640270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.011568", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000-2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within County Service Area No. 23, to provide drainage services within said Area, with the special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10086, "fingerprint": "2000|200000082|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000082|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "c959ac633b6efce0", "measure_id": "200000082", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city council members?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4304, "no_votes": 2143, "total_votes": 6447, "percent_yes": 66.75973320924462, "percent_no": 33.240266790755385, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.640658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.011750", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the electors elect a mayor and four city council members?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10087, "fingerprint": "2000|200000083|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000083|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "25c66e04f7e7a7c2", "measure_id": "200000083", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If the mayor is separately elected from the four city council members, shall the term of office of mayor be: 2 or 4 years? (Yes=2 years, No= 4 years.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3815, "no_votes": 2557, "total_votes": 6372, "percent_yes": 59.871311989956055, "percent_no": 40.128688010043945, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.640931", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.011938", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If the mayor is separately elected from the four city council members, shall the term of office of mayor be: 2 or 4 years? (Yes=2 years, No= 4 years.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10088, "fingerprint": "2000|200000084|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000084|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "c040c2f2ed1d79b9", "measure_id": "200000084", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If the mayor is elected separately from the other members of the city council, shall the mayor receive compensation of $200 a month in addition to what he receives as a councilman?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3206, "no_votes": 2932, "total_votes": 6138, "percent_yes": 52.23199739328772, "percent_no": 47.76800260671228, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.641199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.012120", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If the mayor is elected separately from the other members of the city council, shall the mayor receive compensation of $200 a month in addition to what he receives as a councilman?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10090, "fingerprint": "2000|200000285|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000285|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "5fdf2553e43c37a6", "measure_id": "200000285", "measure_letter": "M-2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring a vote of the people for changes to the San Luis Obispo County General Plan policies and land use designations regarding \"Open Space\", \"Agriculture\", \"Residential Rural\", and \"Rural Lands\" in the unincorporated areas of the county?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43264, "no_votes": 62383, "total_votes": 105647, "percent_yes": 40.95147046295683, "percent_no": 59.04852953704317, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.641812", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.012484", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted requiring a vote of the people for changes to the San Luis Obispo County General Plan policies and land use designations regarding \"Open Space\", \"Agriculture\", \"Residential Rural\", and \"Rural Lands\" in the unincorporated areas of the county?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10094, "fingerprint": "2000|200000457|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000457|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "ecf8efe0118085ac", "measure_id": "200000457", "measure_letter": "O-2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance that would prohibit the City from providing urban services (defined as water and sewer services) or allowing urban uses outside a boundary that is generally the same as the City sphere of influence boundary (as that sphere of influence boundary existed on January 10, 2000), unless the extension of such urban services or uses is first approved by the voters, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3298, "no_votes": 5166, "total_votes": 8464, "percent_yes": 38.96502835538752, "percent_no": 61.03497164461248, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.642942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.013211", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance that would prohibit the City from providing urban services (defined as water and sewer services) or allowing urban uses outside a boundary that is generally the same as the City sphere of influence boundary (as that sphere of influence boundary existed on January 10, 2000), unless the extension of such urban services or uses is first approved by the voters, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10092, "fingerprint": "2000|200000455|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000455|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "cae7f78216ccf979", "measure_id": "200000455", "measure_letter": "P-2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the City Council of Morro Bay support a single phase project for the replacement and demolition of the existing Morro Bay Power Plant (estimated to be completed by 2007) if the project complies with all regulatory laws, ordinances, regulations and standards?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3321, "no_votes": 1919, "total_votes": 5240, "percent_yes": 63.37786259541984, "percent_no": 36.62213740458016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.642398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.012845", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the City Council of Morro Bay support a single phase project for the replacement and demolition of the existing Morro Bay Power Plant (estimated to be completed by 2007) if the project complies with all regulatory laws, ordinances, regulations and standards?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10093, "fingerprint": "2000|200000456|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000456|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "43f435a9d88199c8", "measure_id": "200000456", "measure_letter": "Q-2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be enacted so that no amendment to the Morro Bay General Plan Land Use Element or to the Morro Bay Coastal Land Use Plan that would authorize or otherwise sanction the development or replacement of any electrical-generating facility that exports electricity outside the city limits of the City of Morro Bay shall be effective until approved by a majority vote of those voting in an election in the City of Morro Bay?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2389, "no_votes": 2763, "total_votes": 5152, "percent_yes": 46.37034161490683, "percent_no": 53.62965838509317, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.642669", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.013028", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be enacted so that no amendment to the Morro Bay General Plan Land Use Element or to the Morro Bay Coastal Land Use Plan that would authorize or otherwise sanction the development or replacement of any electrical-generating facility that exports electricity outside the city limits of the City of Morro Bay shall be effective until approved by a majority vote of those voting in an election in the City of Morro Bay?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10091, "fingerprint": "2000|200000454|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000454|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "5b52f6a2b1d8aeff", "measure_id": "200000454", "measure_letter": "R-2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance amending Section 3-3.303 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel/motel bed tax) rate from six percent (6%) to ten percent (10%) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4993, "no_votes": 2906, "total_votes": 7899, "percent_yes": 63.21053297885808, "percent_no": 36.78946702114192, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.642124", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.012664", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance amending Section 3-3.303 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel/motel bed tax) rate from six percent (6%) to ten percent (10%) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10095, "fingerprint": "2000|200000458|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000458|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "aa936aec0e00a951", "measure_id": "200000458", "measure_letter": "S-2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the San Luis Obsipo County Charter be amended to provide that disputes about wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment that cannot be resolved by negotiations between the City and Police Officers' Association and the Firefighters' Union be subject to binding arbitration that is final without City Council or voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10225, "no_votes": 7619, "total_votes": 17844, "percent_yes": 57.302174400358666, "percent_no": 42.697825599641334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.643212", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.013391", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Luis Obsipo County Charter be amended to provide that disputes about wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment that cannot be resolved by negotiations between the City and Police Officers' Association and the Firefighters' Union be subject to binding arbitration that is final without City Council or voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10096, "fingerprint": "2000|200000459|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000459|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "7cb7befd303267b1", "measure_id": "200000459", "measure_letter": "T-2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the \"Taxpayer's Right to Decide\" be enacted, amending the City's Charter to ensure fiscal accountability to the San Luis Obispo citizens by requiring voter approval of any binding arbitration award that imposes a financial burden greater than the increase in the local cost of living or the City's final offer, whichever is greater, limiting binding arbitration to salary only, and enacting other provisions to implement binding arbitration if it is approved by Measure S?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6761, "no_votes": 10781, "total_votes": 17542, "percent_yes": 38.5417854292555, "percent_no": 61.4582145707445, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.643565", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.013573", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \"Taxpayer's Right to Decide\" be enacted, amending the City's Charter to ensure fiscal accountability to the San Luis Obispo citizens by requiring voter approval of any binding arbitration award that imposes a financial burden greater than the increase in the local cost of living or the City's final offer, whichever is greater, limiting binding arbitration to salary only, and enacting other provisions to implement binding arbitration if it is approved by Measure S?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12128, "fingerprint": "2000|200000286|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000286|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e06edbbdcd9b4098", "measure_id": "200000286", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter of the County of San Mateo be amended so that the compensation of members of the Board of Supervisors be set at an amount not greater than 80% of the compensation received by a Judge of the Superior Court?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 76559, "no_votes": 136210, "total_votes": 212769, "percent_yes": 35.982215454319, "percent_no": 64.017784545681, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.261368", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.645013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.014490", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the County of San Mateo be amended so that the compensation of members of the Board of Supervisors be set at an amount not greater than 80% of the compensation received by a Judge of the Superior Court?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12127, "fingerprint": "2000|200000163|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000163|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "2e6be55ec9f99db5", "measure_id": "200000163", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve children's academic performance, reduce class size, improve teaching quality, and expand art, music, technology, and other courses; shall the Menlo Park Elementary School District be authorized to impose a new supplemental special tax up to $298 per parcel effective July 1, 2000, adjusted annually by changes in the Consumer Price Index, to increase the District's Appropriations Limit accordingly, with exemptions for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3415, "no_votes": 1154, "total_votes": 4569, "percent_yes": 74.74283212956884, "percent_no": 25.25716787043116, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.261077", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.644730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.014305", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve children's academic performance, reduce class size, improve teaching quality, and expand art, music, technology, and other courses; shall the Menlo Park Elementary School District be authorized to impose a new supplemental special tax up to $298 per parcel effective July 1, 2000, adjusted annually by changes in the Consumer Price Index, to increase the District's Appropriations Limit accordingly, with exemptions for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 years of age or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10097, "fingerprint": "2000|200000024|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000024|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "20e831e23da561cd", "measure_id": "200000024", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 63236 of the County of San Mateo imposing an annual special tax for fire protection and extended police services according to the schedule therein be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1162, "no_votes": 422, "total_votes": 1584, "percent_yes": 73.35858585858585, "percent_no": 26.641414141414145, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.643906", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.013758", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 63236 of the County of San Mateo imposing an annual special tax for fire protection and extended police services according to the schedule therein be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12129, "fingerprint": "2000|200000287|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000287|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "73cb19f26d161cc3", "measure_id": "200000287", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to assist modern effective law enforcement, shall the County of San Mateo be authorized to issue General Obligation Bonds in the amount of $13 million dollars principal ($13,000,000) to finance the construction, acquisition, and improvement of a crime laboratory and associated facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 145276, "no_votes": 77086, "total_votes": 222362, "percent_yes": 65.33310547665519, "percent_no": 34.66689452334481, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.261588", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.645288", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.014675", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to assist modern effective law enforcement, shall the County of San Mateo be authorized to issue General Obligation Bonds in the amount of $13 million dollars principal ($13,000,000) to finance the construction, acquisition, and improvement of a crime laboratory and associated facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10099, "fingerprint": "2000|200000086|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000086|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "76dc006e3eb1732d", "measure_id": "200000086", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall portions of South San Francisco General Plan Section 3.4 which establish permissible land uses including a pedestrian oriented center, regional commercial including big-box retail, mixed use development and a pedestrian connection between El Camino Real and Mission Road on land adjacent to and near the proposed BART station all as set forth in Resolution 136-99, specifically Guiding Policy 3.4-G-3 and Implementing Policies 3.4-1-3 through 3.4-1-11, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7744, "no_votes": 4514, "total_votes": 12258, "percent_yes": 63.17506934247022, "percent_no": 36.82493065752978, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.644459", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.014121", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall portions of South San Francisco General Plan Section 3.4 which establish permissible land uses including a pedestrian oriented center, regional commercial including big-box retail, mixed use development and a pedestrian connection between El Camino Real and Mission Road on land adjacent to and near the proposed BART station all as set forth in Resolution 136-99, specifically Guiding Policy 3.4-G-3 and Implementing Policies 3.4-1-3 through 3.4-1-11, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12130, "fingerprint": "2000|200000545|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000545|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a32db5cd7dcee76a", "measure_id": "200000545", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To increase student safety and improve learning by upgrading electrical wiring for computer use, heating and cooling systems, intercoms and fire alarms, lighting and security, removing asbestos and other hazardous materials from classrooms; relieve overcrowded campuses; expand classroom space by replacing 35-year old portable trailers and building additional classrooms and bathrooms; repair, acquire, construct and upgrade facilities and school sites, shall the Ravenswood City School District issue $10,000,000 bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4174, "no_votes": 699, "total_votes": 4873, "percent_yes": 85.65565360147754, "percent_no": 14.344346398522461, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.261787", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.645558", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.014858", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase student safety and improve learning by upgrading electrical wiring for computer use, heating and cooling systems, intercoms and fire alarms, lighting and security, removing asbestos and other hazardous materials from classrooms; relieve overcrowded campuses; expand classroom space by replacing 35-year old portable trailers and building additional classrooms and bathrooms; repair, acquire, construct and upgrade facilities and school sites, shall the Ravenswood City School District issue $10,000,000 bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10098, "fingerprint": "2000|200000085|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000085|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "274da80c4c18bdbf", "measure_id": "200000085", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance of the Town of Atherton Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax for Municipal Services and for the Expenditure of Funds Derived from such Tax\", and numbered 511 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1576, "no_votes": 1518, "total_votes": 3094, "percent_yes": 50.93729799612152, "percent_no": 49.06270200387848, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.644183", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.013942", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance of the Town of Atherton Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax for Municipal Services and for the Expenditure of Funds Derived from such Tax\", and numbered 511 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10100, "fingerprint": "2000|200000546|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000546|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a09e4da15c2049d2", "measure_id": "200000546", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and rehabilitate school facilities to meet current health, safety and instructional standards, including replacing deteriorated plumbing, inadequate heating, ventilation, roofs, windows and lighting, refurbishing bathrooms, safety systems, classrooms, and computer and science laboratories, and to establish an independent oversight committee to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements, shall the San Mateo Union High School District issue $137,500,000 in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58979, "no_votes": 22730, "total_votes": 81709, "percent_yes": 72.181767002411, "percent_no": 27.818232997589007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.645911", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.015041", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and rehabilitate school facilities to meet current health, safety and instructional standards, including replacing deteriorated plumbing, inadequate heating, ventilation, roofs, windows and lighting, refurbishing bathrooms, safety systems, classrooms, and computer and science laboratories, and to establish an independent oversight committee to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements, shall the San Mateo Union High School District issue $137,500,000 in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10103, "fingerprint": "2000|200000088|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000088|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "200000088", "measure_letter": "A2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8775, "no_votes": 4965, "total_votes": 13740, "percent_yes": 63.864628820960704, "percent_no": 36.135371179039296, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.646822", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.015587", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of Mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10108, "fingerprint": "2000|200000460|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000460|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "cae77ce4177d3bca", "measure_id": "200000460", "measure_letter": "B2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance that imposes an additional transient occupancy tax (hotel bed tax) in the amount of 2% of the rent charged to hotel guests and provides that the proceeds must be used to fund creek restoration and clean water programs to improve the quality of the water that flows to the ocean be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24046, "no_votes": 9856, "total_votes": 33902, "percent_yes": 70.92796885139519, "percent_no": 29.072031148604808, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.648275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.016511", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance that imposes an additional transient occupancy tax (hotel bed tax) in the amount of 2% of the rent charged to hotel guests and provides that the proceeds must be used to fund creek restoration and clean water programs to improve the quality of the water that flows to the ocean be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10110, "fingerprint": "2000|200000547|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000547|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "a985dd5cade3c47d", "measure_id": "200000547", "measure_letter": "C2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct one new comprehensive high school to relieve classroom overcrowding throughout the Santa Maria Joint Union High School District, upgrade electrical wiring to accomodate computers and modern technology, replace temporary portables, construct permanent classrooms, repair and modernize school classroom facilities, upgrade 35-year-old plumbing and heating and ventilation systems, acquire land and school facilities, and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24208, "no_votes": 11341, "total_votes": 35549, "percent_yes": 68.09755548679288, "percent_no": 31.902444513207115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.648920", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.016903", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct one new comprehensive high school to relieve classroom overcrowding throughout the Santa Maria Joint Union High School District, upgrade electrical wiring to accomodate computers and modern technology, replace temporary portables, construct permanent classrooms, repair and modernize school classroom facilities, upgrade 35-year-old plumbing and heating and ventilation systems, acquire land and school facilities, and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10111, "fingerprint": "2000|200000548|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000548|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "2d18216fe2520af5", "measure_id": "200000548", "measure_letter": "D2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct and acquire permanent classrooms and facilities, to construct a new technology/library center, make the District eligible for State matching funds, build science labs, upgrade classroom electrical systems to provide students with increased computer access, and repair existing facilities shall the Santa Ynez Union High School District issue $28 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5145, "no_votes": 4230, "total_votes": 9375, "percent_yes": 54.88, "percent_no": 45.12, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.649382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.017089", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct and acquire permanent classrooms and facilities, to construct a new technology/library center, make the District eligible for State matching funds, build science labs, upgrade classroom electrical systems to provide students with increased computer access, and repair existing facilities shall the Santa Ynez Union High School District issue $28 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10109, "fingerprint": "2000|200000461|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000461|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "cbac58da5ef1faca", "measure_id": "200000461", "measure_letter": "F2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the charter be adopted making the City of Santa Maria a charter city so that the laws of the City of Santa Maria shall prevail over state law with respect to municipal affairs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9796, "no_votes": 7254, "total_votes": 17050, "percent_yes": 57.45454545454546, "percent_no": 42.54545454545454, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.648543", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.016720", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the charter be adopted making the City of Santa Maria a charter city so that the laws of the City of Santa Maria shall prevail over state law with respect to municipal affairs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10101, "fingerprint": "2000|200000025|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000025|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "4dbc0b77c7192af1", "measure_id": "200000025", "measure_letter": "U2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance which provides for financing, without long-term debt, the construction and operation of a 120-bed North County juvenile hall and 400-bed jail; a rebuilt South County juvenile hall and justice facility; a forensic facility; and countywide correctional programs including prevention, intervention, treatment and supervision, with funds raised by a county sales tax of 1/2%, starting July 1, 2000, and decreasing to 1/4% July 1, 2005, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 41008, "no_votes": 64380, "total_votes": 105388, "percent_yes": 38.91145101909136, "percent_no": 61.08854898090864, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.646239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.015226", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance which provides for financing, without long-term debt, the construction and operation of a 120-bed North County juvenile hall and 400-bed jail; a rebuilt South County juvenile hall and justice facility; a forensic facility; and countywide correctional programs including prevention, intervention, treatment and supervision, with funds raised by a county sales tax of 1/2%, starting July 1, 2000, and decreasing to 1/4% July 1, 2005, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10105, "fingerprint": "2000|200000142|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000142|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "6ed5ff6406917f34", "measure_id": "200000142", "measure_letter": "V2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade every school in the Santa Barbara High School District and achieve facility parity, replace old portables, repair electrical systems, provide hanidcap access, replace broken plumbing, gas and heating systems, repair roofs, rewire classrooms for technology, build an auditorium at Dos Pueblos High School, build necessary new classrooms, and make the District eligible for State matching funds, shall the District issue $67 million of bonds at interest rates within the leagl limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39992, "no_votes": 15581, "total_votes": 55573, "percent_yes": 71.96300361686431, "percent_no": 28.036996383135687, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.647356", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.015955", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade every school in the Santa Barbara High School District and achieve facility parity, replace old portables, repair electrical systems, provide hanidcap access, replace broken plumbing, gas and heating systems, repair roofs, rewire classrooms for technology, build an auditorium at Dos Pueblos High School, build necessary new classrooms, and make the District eligible for State matching funds, shall the District issue $67 million of bonds at interest rates within the leagl limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10106, "fingerprint": "2000|200000143|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000143|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "b46e64cd03714d00", "measure_id": "200000143", "measure_letter": "W2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new comprehensive high school to relieve classroom overcrowding throughout Santa Maria Joint Union High School District, upgrade electrical wiring to accomodate computers and modern technology, replace temporary portables, construct permanent classrooms, repair and modernize school classroom facilities, upgrade 35-year old plumbing and heating and ventlation systems, acquire land and school facilities, and make the district eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the district issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates  within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18488, "no_votes": 9699, "total_votes": 28187, "percent_yes": 65.59052045269095, "percent_no": 34.40947954730905, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.647697", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.016141", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new comprehensive high school to relieve classroom overcrowding throughout Santa Maria Joint Union High School District, upgrade electrical wiring to accomodate computers and modern technology, replace temporary portables, construct permanent classrooms, repair and modernize school classroom facilities, upgrade 35-year old plumbing and heating and ventlation systems, acquire land and school facilities, and make the district eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the district issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates  within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10107, "fingerprint": "2000|200000144|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000144|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "c541d00f4c9fd417", "measure_id": "200000144", "measure_letter": "X2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a library/technology center, make the District eligible for State matching funds, build science labs, provide students with increased classroom computer access, construct and acquire permanent classrooms and facilities, and repair existing facilities shall the Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District replace the existing local school tax by issuing $40 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate provided that in the year the bonds are issued the tax rate is less than the current 1999/2000 tax rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4527, "no_votes": 3176, "total_votes": 7703, "percent_yes": 58.76931065818513, "percent_no": 41.23068934181487, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.648004", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.016327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a library/technology center, make the District eligible for State matching funds, build science labs, provide students with increased classroom computer access, construct and acquire permanent classrooms and facilities, and repair existing facilities shall the Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District replace the existing local school tax by issuing $40 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate provided that in the year the bonds are issued the tax rate is less than the current 1999/2000 tax rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10102, "fingerprint": "2000|200000087|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000087|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "3dc03054f4ceebd6", "measure_id": "200000087", "measure_letter": "Y2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall local public agency housing providers be authorized to annually develop, acquire, or construct housing for low-income persons and families, including elderly or disabled persons, in amounts not to exceed 1/2 of 1% of the existing housing units in the City of Santa Barbara (181 units per year using the 1990 Census), with the number of authorized but unconstructed or unacquired housing units in each year carried over from year to year.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15741, "no_votes": 8291, "total_votes": 24032, "percent_yes": 65.50016644474034, "percent_no": 34.499833555259656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.646547", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.015407", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall local public agency housing providers be authorized to annually develop, acquire, or construct housing for low-income persons and families, including elderly or disabled persons, in amounts not to exceed 1/2 of 1% of the existing housing units in the City of Santa Barbara (181 units per year using the 1990 Census), with the number of authorized but unconstructed or unacquired housing units in each year carried over from year to year.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10104, "fingerprint": "2000|200000089|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000089|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "9c0c6c6e77e00435", "measure_id": "200000089", "measure_letter": "Z2000", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6348, "no_votes": 7086, "total_votes": 13434, "percent_yes": 47.2532380527021, "percent_no": 52.7467619472979, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.647089", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.015772", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12131, "fingerprint": "2000|200000209|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000209|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "f70de97f1f995fe3", "measure_id": "200000209", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2004) the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 1996, thus allowing the district to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 219, "no_votes": 48, "total_votes": 267, "percent_yes": 82.02247191011236, "percent_no": 17.97752808988764, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.268499", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.654000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.020038", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2004) the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 1996, thus allowing the district to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10112, "fingerprint": "2000|200000090|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000090|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "572f4233c6baa90c", "measure_id": "200000090", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  In order to construct a new library without increasing taxes, shall the City Council spend an amount not to exceed $22 million from a combination of cash reserves and public financing?  The new library will provide: More space for books, reference materials, and computers; Separate areas for children's activities, community meetings, and quiet reading; Improved access to rest rooms and book stacks for the disabled; Safe parking for library patrons and the community", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8776, "no_votes": 3506, "total_votes": 12282, "percent_yes": 71.45416056016936, "percent_no": 28.545839439830644, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.649700", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.017272", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  In order to construct a new library without increasing taxes, shall the City Council spend an amount not to exceed $22 million from a combination of cash reserves and public financing?  The new library will provide: More space for books, reference materials, and computers; Separate areas for children's activities, community meetings, and quiet reading; Improved access to rest rooms and book stacks for the disabled; Safe parking for library patrons and the community", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10114, "fingerprint": "2000|200000092|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000092|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "bb707e43a3f67501", "measure_id": "200000092", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on November 1, 1999, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos of the territory described in that order and designated as Blossom Hill Manor No. 8, be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 278, "no_votes": 314, "total_votes": 592, "percent_yes": 46.95945945945945, "percent_no": 53.04054054054055, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.650247", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.017643", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on November 1, 1999, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos of the territory described in that order and designated as Blossom Hill Manor No. 8, be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12143, "fingerprint": "2000|200000550|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000550|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b3f4941ecc217cad", "measure_id": "200000550", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Merger of Mountain View School District and Whisman School District -- Yes; Merger of Mountain View School District and Whisman School District -- No.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12698, "no_votes": 3742, "total_votes": 16440, "percent_yes": 77.23844282238443, "percent_no": 22.761557177615572, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.271792", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.658722", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.023048", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Merger of Mountain View School District and Whisman School District -- Yes; Merger of Mountain View School District and Whisman School District -- No.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10115, "fingerprint": "2000|200000093|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000093|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3ca8843b95d24c7b", "measure_id": "200000093", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on November 1, 1999, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos of the territory described in that order and designated as Blossom Hill Manor No. 7, be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 38, "no_votes": 128, "total_votes": 166, "percent_yes": 22.89156626506024, "percent_no": 77.10843373493975, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.650518", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.017830", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on November 1, 1999, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos of the territory described in that order and designated as Blossom Hill Manor No. 7, be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12144, "fingerprint": "2000|200000551|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000551|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9079bb5035b3058f", "measure_id": "200000551", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to eliminate overcrowding resulting from increasing enrollment, accommodate class size reduction, construct, expand and acquire classrooms, modern science labs, high-tech computer labs, and other educational facilities, shall the Orchard School District maintain the current tax rate and issue $16 million in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1334, "no_votes": 403, "total_votes": 1737, "percent_yes": 76.79907887161774, "percent_no": 23.200921128382262, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.271991", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.659000", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.023229", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to eliminate overcrowding resulting from increasing enrollment, accommodate class size reduction, construct, expand and acquire classrooms, modern science labs, high-tech computer labs, and other educational facilities, shall the Orchard School District maintain the current tax rate and issue $16 million in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10116, "fingerprint": "2000|200000094|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000094|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "68898a40b3dc34c3", "measure_id": "200000094", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on November 1, 1999, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos of the territory described in that order and designated as Camino del Cerro No. 10, be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3, "no_votes": 5, "total_votes": 8, "percent_yes": 37.5, "percent_no": 62.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.650801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.018014", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on November 1, 1999, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos of the territory described in that order and designated as Camino del Cerro No. 10, be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12142, "fingerprint": "2000|200000549|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000549|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "db022aa54d0c8f0b", "measure_id": "200000549", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the existing authorization to exceed the Gann Appropriations Limit be continued for four additional years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13577, "no_votes": 4276, "total_votes": 17853, "percent_yes": 76.04884333165295, "percent_no": 23.951156668347053, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.271594", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.658454", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.022868", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing authorization to exceed the Gann Appropriations Limit be continued for four additional years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10117, "fingerprint": "2000|200000095|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000095|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9c1e5c4713f01f9d", "measure_id": "200000095", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on November 1, 1999, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos of the territory described in that order and designated as Robie Lane No. 3, be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12, "no_votes": 14, "total_votes": 26, "percent_yes": 46.15384615384615, "percent_no": 53.84615384615385, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.651153", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.018198", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on November 1, 1999, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos of the territory described in that order and designated as Robie Lane No. 3, be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12132, "fingerprint": "2000|200000462|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000462|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "27e80677ded14a51", "measure_id": "200000462", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should and Ordinance adding Section 2.04.160 - Term Limits - to the Campbell Mucicipal Code be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8294, "no_votes": 2846, "total_votes": 11140, "percent_yes": 74.4524236983842, "percent_no": 25.547576301615806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.268702", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.654348", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.020219", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should and Ordinance adding Section 2.04.160 - Term Limits - to the Campbell Mucicipal Code be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10118, "fingerprint": "2000|200000096|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000096|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9f2afbc66a2dd23a", "measure_id": "200000096", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on November 1, 1999, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos of the territory described in that order and designated as Marchmont Drive No. 1, be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39, "no_votes": 75, "total_votes": 114, "percent_yes": 34.210526315789465, "percent_no": 65.78947368421053, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.651460", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.018383", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on November 1, 1999, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos ordering the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos of the territory described in that order and designated as Marchmont Drive No. 1, be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12141, "fingerprint": "2000|200000474|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000474|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "df0c53088a697ff2", "measure_id": "200000474", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Saratoga reaffirm and readopt an ordinance prohibiting until March 15, 2002 the approval of residential development projects on lands designated in the Saratoga General Plan as \"Retail Commercial\", \"Professional Administrative\", \"Gateway Landscaping\", or \"Planned Development\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9871, "no_votes": 3554, "total_votes": 13425, "percent_yes": 73.5270018621974, "percent_no": 26.472998137802605, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.271199", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.657869", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.022506", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Saratoga reaffirm and readopt an ordinance prohibiting until March 15, 2002 the approval of residential development projects on lands designated in the Saratoga General Plan as \"Retail Commercial\", \"Professional Administrative\", \"Gateway Landscaping\", or \"Planned Development\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10119, "fingerprint": "2000|200000097|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000097|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8948d1c0b9ad9fe7", "measure_id": "200000097", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Palo Alto adopt Ordinance 4571, a historic preservation ordinance which prohibits, in most cases, the demolition of buildings listed on the Palo Alto Historic Register; Requires City review and approval of certain exterior alterations to these buildings; and provides zoning incentives for the preservation of homes which are historic buildings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9793, "no_votes": 10740, "total_votes": 20533, "percent_yes": 47.69395607071543, "percent_no": 52.30604392928457, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.651730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.018566", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Palo Alto adopt Ordinance 4571, a historic preservation ordinance which prohibits, in most cases, the demolition of buildings listed on the Palo Alto Historic Register; Requires City review and approval of certain exterior alterations to these buildings; and provides zoning incentives for the preservation of homes which are historic buildings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12133, "fingerprint": "2000|200000465|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000465|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "05407e0d4b62b477", "measure_id": "200000465", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Shall Milpitas voters adopt an advisory measure advising the City Council that new funds from a voter approved increase in the Transient Occupancy Tax, which is a tax on the cost of hotel rooms paid only by the person renting the hotel room, be used to support construction of a new library, provide new books and educational software, enhance library services, and to support performing and visual arts programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9634, "no_votes": 3496, "total_votes": 13130, "percent_yes": 73.37395277989337, "percent_no": 26.626047220106628, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.269351", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.655182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.020770", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Shall Milpitas voters adopt an advisory measure advising the City Council that new funds from a voter approved increase in the Transient Occupancy Tax, which is a tax on the cost of hotel rooms paid only by the person renting the hotel room, be used to support construction of a new library, provide new books and educational software, enhance library services, and to support performing and visual arts programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10121, "fingerprint": "2000|200000099|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000099|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "086b0a3d56b9dfdf", "measure_id": "200000099", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Clara City Charter be amended by eliminating obsolete, unnecessary and unclear language, making the Charter gender neutral, making the Charter consistent with current legal requirements, and making minor revisions to make the Charter consistent with modern city charters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16047, "no_votes": 2880, "total_votes": 18927, "percent_yes": 84.78364241559677, "percent_no": 15.216357584403227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.652273", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.018935", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Clara City Charter be amended by eliminating obsolete, unnecessary and unclear language, making the Charter gender neutral, making the Charter consistent with current legal requirements, and making minor revisions to make the Charter consistent with modern city charters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12134, "fingerprint": "2000|200000466|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000466|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "15af92d4cac1e6d1", "measure_id": "200000466", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City of Milpitas transient occupancy tax, which is a tax on the cost of hotel rooms that is paid only by the person renting the room, from eight percent (8%0 of the room rate charged to ten percent (10%) of the room rate charged?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7515, "no_votes": 5233, "total_votes": 12748, "percent_yes": 58.95042359585817, "percent_no": 41.04957640414183, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.269600", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.655453", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.020951", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the City of Milpitas transient occupancy tax, which is a tax on the cost of hotel rooms that is paid only by the person renting the room, from eight percent (8%0 of the room rate charged to ten percent (10%) of the room rate charged?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10122, "fingerprint": "2000|200000100|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000100|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "25b1c11b4f9ee98d", "measure_id": "200000100", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to require that candidates for the elected office of Chief of Police meet the minimum eligibility and qualification requirements imposed by State law upon candidates for the office of Sheriff?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16558, "no_votes": 2244, "total_votes": 18802, "percent_yes": 88.06509945750453, "percent_no": 11.93490054249547, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.652610", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.019119", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to require that candidates for the elected office of Chief of Police meet the minimum eligibility and qualification requirements imposed by State law upon candidates for the office of Sheriff?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12135, "fingerprint": "2000|200000467|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000467|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0758a380c3dd10dc", "measure_id": "200000467", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article III, Section 22 of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto be amended to permit the City Council to implement the City's Comprehensive Plan by granting the Planning and Transportation Commission final decision making authority on specified matters; and to permit the City Council to update the City's planning and zoning laws by amending or repealing Initiative Ordinance No. 2090, which was effective July 23, 1962?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10903, "no_votes": 12732, "total_votes": 23635, "percent_yes": 46.13073831182568, "percent_no": 53.86926168817432, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.269801", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.655723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.021134", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article III, Section 22 of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto be amended to permit the City Council to implement the City's Comprehensive Plan by granting the Planning and Transportation Commission final decision making authority on specified matters; and to permit the City Council to update the City's planning and zoning laws by amending or repealing Initiative Ordinance No. 2090, which was effective July 23, 1962?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10123, "fingerprint": "2000|200000101|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000101|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8057a2226d0649f8", "measure_id": "200000101", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to provide for an increase in City Council Member compensation to $600 per month with annual increases for the Mayor and City Council members equal to the consumer price index, but not to exceed 5% in any year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10791, "no_votes": 7924, "total_votes": 18715, "percent_yes": 57.65963131178199, "percent_no": 42.34036868821801, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.652918", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.019299", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to provide for an increase in City Council Member compensation to $600 per month with annual increases for the Mayor and City Council members equal to the consumer price index, but not to exceed 5% in any year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12136, "fingerprint": "2000|200000468|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000468|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a263914acb183936", "measure_id": "200000468", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Greenline/Urban Growth Boundary policies of the San Jose 2020 General Plan, which protect the City's Greenbelt, hillsides and baylands from urban development, be adopted and affirmed with a requirement that they may only be repealed or amended by the voters of the City of San Jose?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 178340, "no_votes": 40771, "total_votes": 219111, "percent_yes": 81.39253620311166, "percent_no": 18.60746379688834, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.270000", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.656038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.021319", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Greenline/Urban Growth Boundary policies of the San Jose 2020 General Plan, which protect the City's Greenbelt, hillsides and baylands from urban development, be adopted and affirmed with a requirement that they may only be repealed or amended by the voters of the City of San Jose?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10124, "fingerprint": "2000|200000102|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000102|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "01dfdb7894f882b0", "measure_id": "200000102", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to permit the disposal of City-owned real property of $50,000 or less in value without publishing in an official newspaper a notice of intention to sell real property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6819, "no_votes": 11907, "total_votes": 18726, "percent_yes": 36.414610701698166, "percent_no": 63.585389298301834, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.653187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.019484", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to permit the disposal of City-owned real property of $50,000 or less in value without publishing in an official newspaper a notice of intention to sell real property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12137, "fingerprint": "2000|200000469|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000469|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "7bb8306007ffff0e", "measure_id": "200000469", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Amend City Charter to change time within which City Manager must submit to City Council a capital improvement program for next five fiscal years to at least thirty days prior to beginning of each fiscal year to allow capital improvement program to be submitted to Council at same time as City's operating budget for the fiscal year and requiring Planning Commision to submit comments to program at least 10 days prior to Council hearing.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 144312, "no_votes": 47219, "total_votes": 191531, "percent_yes": 75.34654964470504, "percent_no": 24.653450355294964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.270204", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.656311", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.021502", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Amend City Charter to change time within which City Manager must submit to City Council a capital improvement program for next five fiscal years to at least thirty days prior to beginning of each fiscal year to allow capital improvement program to be submitted to Council at same time as City's operating budget for the fiscal year and requiring Planning Commision to submit comments to program at least 10 days prior to Council hearing.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10125, "fingerprint": "2000|200000103|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000103|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "28970f5a31784fad", "measure_id": "200000103", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to permit the award of public works contracts of up to $50,000 in value, with an annual increase consistent with the consumer price index, without publishing in an official newspaper a notice of intent to award a public works contract, provided that the City Council first establishes by ordinance a competitive bid procedure for such contracts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7332, "no_votes": 11269, "total_votes": 18601, "percent_yes": 39.41723563249287, "percent_no": 60.58276436750713, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.653458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.019667", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Clara City Charter be amended to permit the award of public works contracts of up to $50,000 in value, with an annual increase consistent with the consumer price index, without publishing in an official newspaper a notice of intent to award a public works contract, provided that the City Council first establishes by ordinance a competitive bid procedure for such contracts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12138, "fingerprint": "2000|200000470|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000470|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c6fa35940a6ea632", "measure_id": "200000470", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1217 of the San Jose City Charter be amended to remove the specific requirements for the purchase of supplies, materials and equipment from the charter and instead mandate that such bidding requirements be set forth in the Municipal Code?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115680, "no_votes": 72727, "total_votes": 188407, "percent_yes": 61.39899260643183, "percent_no": 38.60100739356817, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.270405", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.656582", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.021688", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1217 of the San Jose City Charter be amended to remove the specific requirements for the purchase of supplies, materials and equipment from the charter and instead mandate that such bidding requirements be set forth in the Municipal Code?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10113, "fingerprint": "2000|200000091|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000091|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a11446122207be98", "measure_id": "200000091", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Gilroy City Council be authorized to annually levy a special tex for eight years (to increase 2% per year) within its Community Facilities District No. 1 to fund paramedic services and related expenses as described in its Resolution No. 99-80, according to the tax formula set forth in that resolution; and shall the appropriations limit for 2000-2001 for CFD No. 1 be set at $2,200,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4044, "no_votes": 2881, "total_votes": 6925, "percent_yes": 58.3971119133574, "percent_no": 41.6028880866426, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.649977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.017457", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Gilroy City Council be authorized to annually levy a special tex for eight years (to increase 2% per year) within its Community Facilities District No. 1 to fund paramedic services and related expenses as described in its Resolution No. 99-80, according to the tax formula set forth in that resolution; and shall the appropriations limit for 2000-2001 for CFD No. 1 be set at $2,200,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12139, "fingerprint": "2000|200000471|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000471|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5b1a376ec8329fb4", "measure_id": "200000471", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1217 of the City Charter be amended to raise the limit for the bidding of public works projects from $50,000 to $100,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 101729, "no_votes": 81771, "total_votes": 183500, "percent_yes": 55.43814713896458, "percent_no": 44.56185286103542, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.270603", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.656865", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.021956", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1217 of the City Charter be amended to raise the limit for the bidding of public works projects from $50,000 to $100,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10126, "fingerprint": "2000|200000104|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000104|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4b343a6e8b4b1856", "measure_id": "200000104", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve, renovate, and expand the Saratoga Community Library in its current location by providing space for more books; ensuring modern earthquake standards; improving access to fire exits; updating electrical wiring for computers; providing adequate seating; updating inadequate lighting; and providing additional space for children's reading areas, shall the City issue $15 million in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, with guaranteed annual audits, a citizen's oversight committee, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8654, "no_votes": 2503, "total_votes": 11157, "percent_yes": 77.56565384960115, "percent_no": 22.434346150398852, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.653727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.019855", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve, renovate, and expand the Saratoga Community Library in its current location by providing space for more books; ensuring modern earthquake standards; improving access to fire exits; updating electrical wiring for computers; providing adequate seating; updating inadequate lighting; and providing additional space for children's reading areas, shall the City issue $15 million in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, with guaranteed annual audits, a citizen's oversight committee, and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12140, "fingerprint": "2000|200000472|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000472|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "df760e626a1fb4d7", "measure_id": "200000472", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve San Jose's neighborhood libraries and expand literacy and learning opportunities for children, families and seniors by: expanding and improving aging branch libraries to reduce noise, add parking, and add space for more books and computers; and building new libraries in neighborhoods throughout the City, shall the City issue $211,790,000 in bonds, at the best rates possible, with guaranteed annual audits, a citizen's oversight committee, and no money for library administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 169041, "no_votes": 54022, "total_votes": 223063, "percent_yes": 75.78172982520634, "percent_no": 24.21827017479366, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.270800", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.657251", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.022140", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve San Jose's neighborhood libraries and expand literacy and learning opportunities for children, families and seniors by: expanding and improving aging branch libraries to reduce noise, add parking, and add space for more books and computers; and building new libraries in neighborhoods throughout the City, shall the City issue $211,790,000 in bonds, at the best rates possible, with guaranteed annual audits, a citizen's oversight committee, and no money for library administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10120, "fingerprint": "2000|200000098|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000098|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "079e212dcaed6a40", "measure_id": "200000098", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall construction of a new terminal or additional passenger gates at the Airport be prevented unless and until the Route 87 Freeway project, a rail link to the Airport, and additional southbound lane on the I-880/Coleman Avenua interchange, and three Airport entrance projects to be designed for projected traffic capacity, are within one year of completion?  The measure specifies use of Airport funds if legally permitted, rather than City General Funds, for these projects.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56738, "no_votes": 93365, "total_votes": 150103, "percent_yes": 37.79937776060438, "percent_no": 62.20062223939562, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.652006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.018752", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall construction of a new terminal or additional passenger gates at the Airport be prevented unless and until the Route 87 Freeway project, a rail link to the Airport, and additional southbound lane on the I-880/Coleman Avenua interchange, and three Airport entrance projects to be designed for projected traffic capacity, are within one year of completion?  The measure specifies use of Airport funds if legally permitted, rather than City General Funds, for these projects.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10129, "fingerprint": "2000|200000473|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000473|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "7f756cc8cad7d6cc", "measure_id": "200000473", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve San Jose's neighborhood parks' safety and expand recreation opportunities for children, families and seniors, by: installing lighting, reconstructing deteriorating playgrounds and restrooms; preserving open space; constructing trails; constructing new recreational sprts facilities; improving Community and Senior Centers; and constructing improvements to regional parks, like Happy Hollow shall the City issue $228,030,000 in bonds, at the best rates possible, with guaranteed annual audits, a citizen's oversight committee, and no money for parks administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 177478, "no_votes": 47926, "total_votes": 225404, "percent_yes": 78.73773313694522, "percent_no": 21.262266863054776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.657556", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.022323", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve San Jose's neighborhood parks' safety and expand recreation opportunities for children, families and seniors, by: installing lighting, reconstructing deteriorating playgrounds and restrooms; preserving open space; constructing trails; constructing new recreational sprts facilities; improving Community and Senior Centers; and constructing improvements to regional parks, like Happy Hollow shall the City issue $228,030,000 in bonds, at the best rates possible, with guaranteed annual audits, a citizen's oversight committee, and no money for parks administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10127, "fingerprint": "2000|200000463|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000463|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "035c3f2ad07908b1", "measure_id": "200000463", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance of the City of Gilroy authorizing the increase in the rate of the City's existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 9% to 10% be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4601, "no_votes": 5501, "total_votes": 10102, "percent_yes": 45.54543654721837, "percent_no": 54.45456345278163, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.654633", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.020404", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance of the City of Gilroy authorizing the increase in the rate of the City's existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 9% to 10% be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10128, "fingerprint": "2000|200000464|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000464|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4386cae941797639", "measure_id": "200000464", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Admission Tax Ordinance of the City of Gilroy authorizing the enactment and imposition of a new general tax in the form of an admission tax of 5% of the Admission charge for certain events held within the City of Gilroy be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2589, "no_votes": 7599, "total_votes": 10188, "percent_yes": 25.41224970553592, "percent_no": 74.58775029446409, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.654910", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.020588", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Admission Tax Ordinance of the City of Gilroy authorizing the enactment and imposition of a new general tax in the form of an admission tax of 5% of the Admission charge for certain events held within the City of Gilroy be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10130, "fingerprint": "2000|200000475|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000475|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b3ef29a9d987187a", "measure_id": "200000475", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Sunnyvale accept flouridated water from its water suppliers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25053, "no_votes": 13284, "total_votes": 38337, "percent_yes": 65.3494013616089, "percent_no": 34.6505986383911, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.658182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.022688", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Sunnyvale accept flouridated water from its water suppliers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10132, "fingerprint": "2000|200000210|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000210|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "f70de97f1f995fe3", "measure_id": "200000210", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2004) the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 1996, thus allowing the District to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 998, "no_votes": 246, "total_votes": 1244, "percent_yes": 80.22508038585208, "percent_no": 19.77491961414792, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.659611", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.023596", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District continue for four years (July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2004) the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 1996, thus allowing the District to continue to use the revenue generated by the existing special tax of $150 per parcel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10131, "fingerprint": "2000|200000145|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000145|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "f3564fc64fbfdff9", "measure_id": "200000145", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and renovate every school in the Soquel Union Elementary School District, replace deteriorating facilities to eliminate student safety hazards, make health and safety improvements throughout the District, provide handicapped access, reduce overcrowding in libraries, computer labs and cafeterias, build new classrooms and facilities, repair classroom heating/ventilation systems and upgrade classroom electrical systems for safety and to provide greater student access to computers shall the District issue $15 million of bonds at the lowest interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5508, "no_votes": 3639, "total_votes": 9147, "percent_yes": 60.21646441456216, "percent_no": 39.78353558543784, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.659327", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.023413", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and renovate every school in the Soquel Union Elementary School District, replace deteriorating facilities to eliminate student safety hazards, make health and safety improvements throughout the District, provide handicapped access, reduce overcrowding in libraries, computer labs and cafeterias, build new classrooms and facilities, repair classroom heating/ventilation systems and upgrade classroom electrical systems for safety and to provide greater student access to computers shall the District issue $15 million of bonds at the lowest interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10135, "fingerprint": "2000|200000552|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000552|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "f8e153635cd5cd64", "measure_id": "200000552", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct, and modernize school facilities, build new to replace 30-year-old portables, construct a permanent Junior High at the current site, upgrade drainage, replace deteriorating plumbing and inadequate electrical systems, improve student access to classroom computers and technology, and make the District eligible to receive over $8 million in state-matching funds, shall the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $18,500,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9009, "no_votes": 3164, "total_votes": 12173, "percent_yes": 74.00805060379528, "percent_no": 25.991949396204717, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.660493", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.024153", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct, and modernize school facilities, build new to replace 30-year-old portables, construct a permanent Junior High at the current site, upgrade drainage, replace deteriorating plumbing and inadequate electrical systems, improve student access to classroom computers and technology, and make the District eligible to receive over $8 million in state-matching funds, shall the San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $18,500,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10133, "fingerprint": "2000|200000476|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000476|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "d8e5951d1a63b707", "measure_id": "200000476", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz be amended by amending Sections 601, 602, and 605 of Article VI and Section 701 of Article VII providing for the election and recall of City Councilmembers by district and the election of City Councilmembers by a majority vote, the text of which is on file in the City Clerk's Department and the County Elections Department?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11776, "no_votes": 12653, "total_votes": 24429, "percent_yes": 48.20500225142249, "percent_no": 51.79499774857751, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.659886", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.023787", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz be amended by amending Sections 601, 602, and 605 of Article VI and Section 701 of Article VII providing for the election and recall of City Councilmembers by district and the election of City Councilmembers by a majority vote, the text of which is on file in the City Clerk's Department and the County Elections Department?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10134, "fingerprint": "2000|200000477|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000477|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "fbac25e813f11a26", "measure_id": "200000477", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Cruz adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.28.030 of the Municipal Code raising the transient occupancy rate from 10% to 12% and dedicating the revenues from the two percent differential to provide additional funding to non-profit homeless service providers for the provision of shelter services, including establishing permanent year-round shelter with appropriate facilities for homeless families and children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13882, "no_votes": 11847, "total_votes": 25729, "percent_yes": 53.95468148781531, "percent_no": 46.04531851218469, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.660160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.023972", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Cruz adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.28.030 of the Municipal Code raising the transient occupancy rate from 10% to 12% and dedicating the revenues from the two percent differential to provide additional funding to non-profit homeless service providers for the provision of shelter services, including establishing permanent year-round shelter with appropriate facilities for homeless families and children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10136, "fingerprint": "2000|200000288|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000288|SHASTA", "content_hash": "1ca1fa755c3e9097", "measure_id": "200000288", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special tax of not to exceed $30.00 per year be levied upon parcels of real property, on which improvements with a value of more than $2,000 exist, located in County Service Area No. 1 (the area served by the Shasta County Fire Department) to fund the acquisition, outfitting, operation, maintenance, and repair of fire/rescue vehicles as provided in Shasta County Ordinance No. 611?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8951, "no_votes": 8811, "total_votes": 17762, "percent_yes": 50.39409976354015, "percent_no": 49.60590023645985, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.660801", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.024338", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax of not to exceed $30.00 per year be levied upon parcels of real property, on which improvements with a value of more than $2,000 exist, located in County Service Area No. 1 (the area served by the Shasta County Fire Department) to fund the acquisition, outfitting, operation, maintenance, and repair of fire/rescue vehicles as provided in Shasta County Ordinance No. 611?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10137, "fingerprint": "2000|200000478|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000478|SHASTA", "content_hash": "ddb4cbaba194f719", "measure_id": "200000478", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall an initiative ordinance be approved prohibiting corporations from doing business within the City of Shasta Lake when the corporations or subsidiary corporations have had, in the last 20 years, a history of ten or more violations (i.e. criminal convictions, fines or penalties, or notices of violations issued by State or Federal regulatory agencies) or when the corporations have a director who is also a director of a corporation with a similar history of such violations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1280, "no_votes": 1699, "total_votes": 2979, "percent_yes": 42.96743873783148, "percent_no": 57.03256126216852, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.661075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.024522", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall an initiative ordinance be approved prohibiting corporations from doing business within the City of Shasta Lake when the corporations or subsidiary corporations have had, in the last 20 years, a history of ten or more violations (i.e. criminal convictions, fines or penalties, or notices of violations issued by State or Federal regulatory agencies) or when the corporations have a director who is also a director of a corporation with a similar history of such violations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10140, "fingerprint": "2000|200000479|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000479|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "97521ef58ce6619b", "measure_id": "200000479", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 105, "no_votes": 173, "total_votes": 278, "percent_yes": 37.76978417266187, "percent_no": 62.23021582733813, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.661896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.025072", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12145, "fingerprint": "2000|200000480|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000480|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "0f6356d7580fba1b", "measure_id": "200000480", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108, "no_votes": 170, "total_votes": 278, "percent_yes": 38.84892086330935, "percent_no": 61.15107913669065, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.275005", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.662165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.025256", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10138, "fingerprint": "2000|200000026|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000026|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "e652e5c6392b366d", "measure_id": "200000026", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the Lake Shastina Community Services District exercise the power to provide water, and all related functions required or appropriate in order to provide such water to the Lake Shastina community, including the levying of assessments and the setting of rates in accordance with applicable laws, and upon doing so be the sole provider of such water service for Lake Shastina?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 474, "no_votes": 76, "total_votes": 550, "percent_yes": 86.18181818181819, "percent_no": 13.818181818181813, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.661347", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.024704", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the Lake Shastina Community Services District exercise the power to provide water, and all related functions required or appropriate in order to provide such water to the Lake Shastina community, including the levying of assessments and the setting of rates in accordance with applicable laws, and upon doing so be the sole provider of such water service for Lake Shastina?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10139, "fingerprint": "2000|200000027|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000027|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "b88dada74fa05a0f", "measure_id": "200000027", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the Lake Shastina Community Services District establish an annual water standby or availability charge not to exceed $40 per parcel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 395, "no_votes": 154, "total_votes": 549, "percent_yes": 71.94899817850637, "percent_no": 28.051001821493628, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.661618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.024888", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the Lake Shastina Community Services District establish an annual water standby or availability charge not to exceed $40 per parcel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10142, "fingerprint": "2000|200000146|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000146|SOLANO", "content_hash": "0e38af7c890d9de5", "measure_id": "200000146", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding, and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7, "no_votes": 5, "total_votes": 12, "percent_yes": 58.333333333333336, "percent_no": 41.666666666666664, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.663129", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.026094", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding, and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10141, "fingerprint": "2000|200000105|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000105|SOLANO", "content_hash": "51bc78433c3b3a90", "measure_id": "200000105", "measure_letter": "L2", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1824, "no_votes": 1532, "total_votes": 3356, "percent_yes": 54.350417163289634, "percent_no": 45.649582836710366, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.662522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.025436", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12146, "fingerprint": "2000|200000106|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000106|SOLANO", "content_hash": "739696e0dd55912c", "measure_id": "200000106", "measure_letter": "L4", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1992, "no_votes": 1516, "total_votes": 3508, "percent_yes": 56.78449258836944, "percent_no": 43.21550741163056, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.275415", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.662854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.025617", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of mayor be four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10143, "fingerprint": "2000|200000157|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000157|SOLANO", "content_hash": "bafdd89b8ac5646d", "measure_id": "200000157", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City require the voters approve, in concept, the sale or development of land both owned by the City (now or in the future) and designated in the 1999 General Plan as open space when the sale or development is not consistent with the open space zoning regulations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2551, "no_votes": 325, "total_votes": 2876, "percent_yes": 88.69958275382476, "percent_no": 11.300417246175243, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.663401", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.026321", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City require the voters approve, in concept, the sale or development of land both owned by the City (now or in the future) and designated in the 1999 General Plan as open space when the sale or development is not consistent with the open space zoning regulations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10145, "fingerprint": "2000|200000212|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000212|SOLANO", "content_hash": "af6abaf3a9704ca9", "measure_id": "200000212", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide adequate classrooms and science labs, make essential health, safety and building repairs at aging school facilities, relieve severe overcrowding by acquiring, constructing or renovating local school sites, and qualify for State construction and renovation funding, shall the Vacaville Unified School District be authorized to issue $80,000,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, appoint a community oversight committee, and conduct annual audits to ensure funds are only spent on school improvement efforts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6096, "no_votes": 3534, "total_votes": 9630, "percent_yes": 63.30218068535826, "percent_no": 36.69781931464174, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.664064", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.026695", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate classrooms and science labs, make essential health, safety and building repairs at aging school facilities, relieve severe overcrowding by acquiring, constructing or renovating local school sites, and qualify for State construction and renovation funding, shall the Vacaville Unified School District be authorized to issue $80,000,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, appoint a community oversight committee, and conduct annual audits to ensure funds are only spent on school improvement efforts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10144, "fingerprint": "2000|200000211|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000211|SOLANO", "content_hash": "04f0ab888ef96bfd", "measure_id": "200000211", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of not to exceed $76.7 million dollars ($76,700,000), rates of interest not to exceed the statutory limit, to improve school facilities, including acquisition of real property, construction of new facilities, renovation of existing facilities and such other capital improvements essential to the improvement of school facilities and the costs incidental thereto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9297, "no_votes": 5426, "total_votes": 14723, "percent_yes": 63.14609794199552, "percent_no": 36.85390205800448, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.663791", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.026511", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of not to exceed $76.7 million dollars ($76,700,000), rates of interest not to exceed the statutory limit, to improve school facilities, including acquisition of real property, construction of new facilities, renovation of existing facilities and such other capital improvements essential to the improvement of school facilities and the costs incidental thereto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10146, "fingerprint": "2000|200000481|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000481|SOLANO", "content_hash": "bc186e6e7e66f37b", "measure_id": "200000481", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Vallejo Charter, Sections 300, 301, 302, 302.1, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 319, 400, 401, 407(d), 408, 500, 501, 502, 503, 600, 701, 702, 714, 715, 716, 718, 719, 721, 802, 805, 806, 808, 809(a)(b)(j),1101, 1103, 1104, 1106, 1107, and 1111 be amended and Sections 704, 705 and 724 be repealed, as set forth in Resolution No. 00-345 N.C. on file with the City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15587, "no_votes": 13172, "total_votes": 28759, "percent_yes": 54.19868562884662, "percent_no": 45.80131437115338, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.664364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.026875", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Vallejo Charter, Sections 300, 301, 302, 302.1, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 319, 400, 401, 407(d), 408, 500, 501, 502, 503, 600, 701, 702, 714, 715, 716, 718, 719, 721, 802, 805, 806, 808, 809(a)(b)(j),1101, 1103, 1104, 1106, 1107, and 1111 be amended and Sections 704, 705 and 724 be repealed, as set forth in Resolution No. 00-345 N.C. on file with the City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10147, "fingerprint": "2000|200000553|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000553|SOLANO", "content_hash": "0e38af7c890d9de5", "measure_id": "200000553", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding, and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 14, "percent_yes": 78.57142857142857, "percent_no": 21.42857142857143, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.664659", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.027054", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding, and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12147, "fingerprint": "2000|200000554|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000554|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e0714f68997afdd8", "measure_id": "200000554", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "SHORELINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT QUALIFIED SPECIAL TAX ASSESSMENT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS.  To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $120 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 4%, for no more than six years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 890, "no_votes": 351, "total_votes": 1241, "percent_yes": 71.7163577759871, "percent_no": 28.283642224012894, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.280791", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.669899", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.030343", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "SHORELINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT QUALIFIED SPECIAL TAX ASSESSMENT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS.  To maintain existing school programs and improve the quality of education; to provide funds to buy updated textbooks and materials for math, reading, and writing courses; and to enhance critical computer science, library, and arts programs, shall the Shoreline Unified School District extend the existing $120 a year parcel tax, increasing annually at 4%, for no more than six years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10148, "fingerprint": "2000|200000002|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000002|SONOMA", "content_hash": "cffe5cb6ab8e831e", "measure_id": "200000002", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors of Sonoma County be authorized to levy a special tax in Mayacamas Community Facilities District No. 7 having a maximum rate of $66.00 per unit of benefit for the purpose of financing enhanced levels of fire protection and suppression services within the District and shall the District have its annual appropriations limit established at $60,000.00?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 63, "no_votes": 27, "total_votes": 90, "percent_yes": 70.0, "percent_no": 30.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-01-25", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.665010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.027246", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors of Sonoma County be authorized to levy a special tax in Mayacamas Community Facilities District No. 7 having a maximum rate of $66.00 per unit of benefit for the purpose of financing enhanced levels of fire protection and suppression services within the District and shall the District have its annual appropriations limit established at $60,000.00?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12148, "fingerprint": "2000|200000555|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000555|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e11df33750b7b4d6", "measure_id": "200000555", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education and provide safety for our children; construct and modernize school facilities, including libraries, computer labs and multi-use rooms for school and community use; repair aging infrastructure such as worn-out electrical and heating systems and restrooms; and construct permanent classrooms to replace aging portables; shall the Shoreline Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $7,000,000 at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 862, "no_votes": 358, "total_votes": 1220, "percent_yes": 70.65573770491802, "percent_no": 29.344262295081975, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.280995", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.670170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.030524", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education and provide safety for our children; construct and modernize school facilities, including libraries, computer labs and multi-use rooms for school and community use; repair aging infrastructure such as worn-out electrical and heating systems and restrooms; and construct permanent classrooms to replace aging portables; shall the Shoreline Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $7,000,000 at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10149, "fingerprint": "2000|200000028|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000028|SONOMA", "content_hash": "54f71e60a3ed32de", "measure_id": "200000028", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to (1) widen and improve Highway 101 from Windsor to the Sonoma-Marin border; (2) improve or construct major Highway 101 interchanges; and (3) improve sections of Highway 116, shall a 1/2 cent sales tax be levied for a period not to exceed eight (8) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 87532, "no_votes": 61972, "total_votes": 149504, "percent_yes": 58.54826626712328, "percent_no": 41.45173373287672, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.665325", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.027439", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to (1) widen and improve Highway 101 from Windsor to the Sonoma-Marin border; (2) improve or construct major Highway 101 interchanges; and (3) improve sections of Highway 116, shall a 1/2 cent sales tax be levied for a period not to exceed eight (8) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10150, "fingerprint": "2000|200000029|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000029|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0e33dfa7e09e1a68", "measure_id": "200000029", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to (1) repair and improve local streets and roads; (2) implement passenger rail service through Sonoma and Marin counties; (3) expand transit service by increasing bus frequencies and establishing broader service; (4) enhance transit service for seniors and the disabled; and (5) build and improve bicycle and pedestrian paths, shall a 1/4 cent sales tax be levied for a period not to exceed sixteen (16) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 88819, "no_votes": 58444, "total_votes": 147263, "percent_yes": 60.31318117925073, "percent_no": 39.68681882074927, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.665727", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.027622", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to (1) repair and improve local streets and roads; (2) implement passenger rail service through Sonoma and Marin counties; (3) expand transit service by increasing bus frequencies and establishing broader service; (4) enhance transit service for seniors and the disabled; and (5) build and improve bicycle and pedestrian paths, shall a 1/4 cent sales tax be levied for a period not to exceed sixteen (16) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10151, "fingerprint": "2000|200000164|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000164|SONOMA", "content_hash": "02db109c843b7376", "measure_id": "200000164", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "OAK GROVE UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX ASSESSMENT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND SERVICES.  Shall the Oak Grove Union School District provide funds for an educationally sound Fine Arts Program and other educational programs key to the full education of the children of the Oak Grove Union School District by levying a special assessment for a period of five years, beginning July 1, 2000, at the rate of $36 per parcel, with certain senior citizen and other exemptions as set forth in the full text of the Measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 860, "no_votes": 429, "total_votes": 1289, "percent_yes": 66.71838634600465, "percent_no": 33.28161365399535, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.665998", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.027802", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "OAK GROVE UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX ASSESSMENT FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND SERVICES.  Shall the Oak Grove Union School District provide funds for an educationally sound Fine Arts Program and other educational programs key to the full education of the children of the Oak Grove Union School District by levying a special assessment for a period of five years, beginning July 1, 2000, at the rate of $36 per parcel, with certain senior citizen and other exemptions as set forth in the full text of the Measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10152, "fingerprint": "2000|200000182|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000182|SONOMA", "content_hash": "767b7428f95d3d89", "measure_id": "200000182", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Point Arena Joint Union High School District form a Citizen's Oversight Committee and be authorized to issue $4,235,000 in bonds (at interest rates within the legal limit) to fund the specific projects in the Bond plan, including classrooms, cafeteria/kitchens, bathrooms, security lighting, weather appropriate sidewalks and parking/driveways at each high school, and match approximately $757,488 of State grants for modernizing science laboratories, leaky roofs, gymnasium floors, drainage, lighting, windows and electrical systems at Point Arena High School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 313, "no_votes": 98, "total_votes": 411, "percent_yes": 76.15571776155717, "percent_no": 23.84428223844283, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-09", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.666266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.027987", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Point Arena Joint Union High School District form a Citizen's Oversight Committee and be authorized to issue $4,235,000 in bonds (at interest rates within the legal limit) to fund the specific projects in the Bond plan, including classrooms, cafeteria/kitchens, bathrooms, security lighting, weather appropriate sidewalks and parking/driveways at each high school, and match approximately $757,488 of State grants for modernizing science laboratories, leaky roofs, gymnasium floors, drainage, lighting, windows and electrical systems at Point Arena High School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10153, "fingerprint": "2000|200000289|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000289|SONOMA", "content_hash": "6172ce05b726f5dd", "measure_id": "200000289", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance be approved to amend Section 12-11 of the Sonoma County Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from nine (9) percent to twelve (12) percent upon transients occupying lodging located only within the unincorporated area of Sonoma County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 65269, "no_votes": 109045, "total_votes": 174314, "percent_yes": 37.443349358055, "percent_no": 62.556650641945, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.666531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.028172", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be approved to amend Section 12-11 of the Sonoma County Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from nine (9) percent to twelve (12) percent upon transients occupying lodging located only within the unincorporated area of Sonoma County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10154, "fingerprint": "2000|200000290|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000290|SONOMA", "content_hash": "be6180804931f7ce", "measure_id": "200000290", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the \"Rural Heritage Initiative\" ordinance which would, for the next thirty years, add a requirement for voter approval of any amendment to the Sonoma County General Plan to (i) amend the land use designation or increase the density of lands designated as \"Land Intensive Agriculture,\" \"Land Extensive Agriculture,\" \"Diverse Agriculture,\" or \"Resources and Rural Development,\" or (ii) make changes in specified General Plan land use goals, objectives, or policies, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78590, "no_votes": 105923, "total_votes": 184513, "percent_yes": 42.59320481483689, "percent_no": 57.40679518516311, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.666840", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.028353", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(INITIATIVE)  Shall the \"Rural Heritage Initiative\" ordinance which would, for the next thirty years, add a requirement for voter approval of any amendment to the Sonoma County General Plan to (i) amend the land use designation or increase the density of lands designated as \"Land Intensive Agriculture,\" \"Land Extensive Agriculture,\" \"Diverse Agriculture,\" or \"Resources and Rural Development,\" or (ii) make changes in specified General Plan land use goals, objectives, or policies, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10160, "fingerprint": "2000|200000487|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000487|SONOMA", "content_hash": "45c04e9a0ced71ae", "measure_id": "200000487", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the City of Santa Rosa adopt an ordinance amending Section 3-28.020 of the Santa Rosa City Code to increase the City's Transient Occupancy Tax upon transients occupying lodgings within the City to twelve percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23591, "no_votes": 31041, "total_votes": 54632, "percent_yes": 43.18165177917704, "percent_no": 56.81834822082296, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.668542", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.029438", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the City of Santa Rosa adopt an ordinance amending Section 3-28.020 of the Santa Rosa City Code to increase the City's Transient Occupancy Tax upon transients occupying lodgings within the City to twelve percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10155, "fingerprint": "2000|200000482|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000482|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e25404dc72131f74", "measure_id": "200000482", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to maintain essential City services, shall the Cloverdale City Telephone, Electricity and Gas Users Tax, Municipal Code Chapter 3.40 be amended as follows: (1) the tax shall be increased to five percent; (2) the tax shall also be imposed on cellular, facsimile, pager and cable video services, with account addresses within the City of Cloverdale; and (3) the annual cumulative dollar limitation for any single service user shall be increased to $350?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 464, "no_votes": 2215, "total_votes": 2679, "percent_yes": 17.31989548338932, "percent_no": 82.68010451661068, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.667134", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.028536", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain essential City services, shall the Cloverdale City Telephone, Electricity and Gas Users Tax, Municipal Code Chapter 3.40 be amended as follows: (1) the tax shall be increased to five percent; (2) the tax shall also be imposed on cellular, facsimile, pager and cable video services, with account addresses within the City of Cloverdale; and (3) the annual cumulative dollar limitation for any single service user shall be increased to $350?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10156, "fingerprint": "2000|200000483|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000483|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4f004f205ca3b19f", "measure_id": "200000483", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance establishing growth control measures limiting annual building permits in the City of Healdsburg to 25 per year, subject to certain exemptions, and amending the General Plan be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1852, "no_votes": 2531, "total_votes": 4383, "percent_yes": 42.25416381473876, "percent_no": 57.74583618526124, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.667402", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.028719", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance establishing growth control measures limiting annual building permits in the City of Healdsburg to 25 per year, subject to certain exemptions, and amending the General Plan be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10157, "fingerprint": "2000|200000484|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000484|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4b89c8ece51649aa", "measure_id": "200000484", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance establishing growth control measures limiting annual building permits to 30 per year in the City of Healdsburg be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2472, "no_votes": 2003, "total_votes": 4475, "percent_yes": 55.24022346368716, "percent_no": 44.75977653631284, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.667670", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.028900", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance establishing growth control measures limiting annual building permits to 30 per year in the City of Healdsburg be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10158, "fingerprint": "2000|200000485|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000485|SONOMA", "content_hash": "554a9f6763f799b4", "measure_id": "200000485", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of Rohnert Park amend the General Plan to make the Urban Growth Boundary effective for 20 years so as to prevent urban sprawl, protect community separators, preserve agricultural land and open space, and control the amount and rate of growth to conform to the new General Plan, be spread evenly over 20 years, and provide that no change can be made to the Urban Growth Boundary measure unless approved by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10274, "no_votes": 4249, "total_votes": 14523, "percent_yes": 70.74295944364111, "percent_no": 29.257040556358888, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.667939", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.029078", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of Rohnert Park amend the General Plan to make the Urban Growth Boundary effective for 20 years so as to prevent urban sprawl, protect community separators, preserve agricultural land and open space, and control the amount and rate of growth to conform to the new General Plan, be spread evenly over 20 years, and provide that no change can be made to the Urban Growth Boundary measure unless approved by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10159, "fingerprint": "2000|200000486|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000486|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f6e2fbac2770c884", "measure_id": "200000486", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Without increasing taxes, shall private sponsors with government assistance be allowed to develop, construct, or acquire low-rent housing subject to these conditions: Authorizing units shall not exceed four percent of units in the City; No more than 15 percent of the units shall be located in any Section (A through S) or specific plan area; Twenty percent of the units shall be reserved for elderly or disabled households; The authorization shall expire November 8, 2020?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7462, "no_votes": 6504, "total_votes": 13966, "percent_yes": 53.42975798367464, "percent_no": 46.57024201632536, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.668248", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.029256", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing taxes, shall private sponsors with government assistance be allowed to develop, construct, or acquire low-rent housing subject to these conditions: Authorizing units shall not exceed four percent of units in the City; No more than 15 percent of the units shall be located in any Section (A through S) or specific plan area; Twenty percent of the units shall be reserved for elderly or disabled households; The authorization shall expire November 8, 2020?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10161, "fingerprint": "2000|200000488|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000488|SONOMA", "content_hash": "b3b60d0649d8973c", "measure_id": "200000488", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City increase the existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 6% to 10%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2544, "no_votes": 1219, "total_votes": 3763, "percent_yes": 67.6056338028169, "percent_no": 32.3943661971831, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.668827", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.029616", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 6% to 10%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10162, "fingerprint": "2000|200000489|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000489|SONOMA", "content_hash": "7431a5e8d8674e11", "measure_id": "200000489", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City increase the Sales Tax by 0.125%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1898, "no_votes": 1869, "total_votes": 3767, "percent_yes": 50.38492168834616, "percent_no": 49.61507831165384, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.669089", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.029800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase the Sales Tax by 0.125%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10163, "fingerprint": "2000|200000490|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000490|SONOMA", "content_hash": "000b2ab106e90d86", "measure_id": "200000490", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Sonoma adopt an ordinance authorizing public entities to develop, construct or acquire 100 additional units of low-rent housing in the City of Sonoma?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2808, "no_votes": 1890, "total_votes": 4698, "percent_yes": 59.77011494252874, "percent_no": 40.22988505747126, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.669365", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.029983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Sonoma adopt an ordinance authorizing public entities to develop, construct or acquire 100 additional units of low-rent housing in the City of Sonoma?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10164, "fingerprint": "2000|200000491|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000491|SONOMA", "content_hash": "e62506a55710fa3b", "measure_id": "200000491", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the City of Sonoma General Plan to establish an urban growth boundary be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2966, "no_votes": 1689, "total_votes": 4655, "percent_yes": 63.71643394199785, "percent_no": 36.28356605800215, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.669631", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.030165", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the City of Sonoma General Plan to establish an urban growth boundary be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10165, "fingerprint": "2000|200000107|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000107|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "0f6356d7580fba1b", "measure_id": "200000107", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 544, "no_votes": 619, "total_votes": 1163, "percent_yes": 46.7755803955288, "percent_no": 53.2244196044712, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.670446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.030709", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10166, "fingerprint": "2000|200000108|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000108|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "97521ef58ce6619b", "measure_id": "200000108", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 556, "no_votes": 606, "total_votes": 1162, "percent_yes": 47.84853700516351, "percent_no": 52.15146299483649, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.670713", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.030890", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10167, "fingerprint": "2000|200000492|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000492|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "8b86bbdbcd3e65ce", "measure_id": "200000492", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Hughson adopt a city charter reading as follows: \"The City of Hughson is a charter city, and may control all municipal affairs by ordinance, resolutions, or policies adopted by the City Council of the City of Hughson.  All ordinances, resolutions and policies in effect on November 7, 2000 shall remain in effect until amended or changed by the City Council of the City of Hughson.\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 464, "no_votes": 512, "total_votes": 976, "percent_yes": 47.54098360655737, "percent_no": 52.45901639344263, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.670981", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.031072", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Hughson adopt a city charter reading as follows: \"The City of Hughson is a charter city, and may control all municipal affairs by ordinance, resolutions, or policies adopted by the City Council of the City of Hughson.  All ordinances, resolutions and policies in effect on November 7, 2000 shall remain in effect until amended or changed by the City Council of the City of Hughson.\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10168, "fingerprint": "2000|200000493|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000493|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "8b6c62d27e98a0cf", "measure_id": "200000493", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the City of Hughson eliminate the City Police force, and contract instead with the Stanislaus County Sheriff's Office for performance of law enforcement services within the City of Hughson?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 575, "no_votes": 449, "total_votes": 1024, "percent_yes": 56.15234375, "percent_no": 43.84765625, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.671283", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.031252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  Shall the City of Hughson eliminate the City Police force, and contract instead with the Stanislaus County Sheriff's Office for performance of law enforcement services within the City of Hughson?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10170, "fingerprint": "2000|200000556|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000556|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "6ad87344ae90da84", "measure_id": "200000556", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To alleviate student overcrowding, provide financing to construct and acquire school facilities including a middle school with a gymnasium, add classrooms and a multipurpose room at the high school, construct an Adult Education Center, rehabilitate and expand existing facilities at Bonita Elementary, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Newman-Crows landing Unified School District be authorized to issue $11.35 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1293, "no_votes": 492, "total_votes": 1785, "percent_yes": 72.43697478991596, "percent_no": 27.563025210084035, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.671846", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.031612", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To alleviate student overcrowding, provide financing to construct and acquire school facilities including a middle school with a gymnasium, add classrooms and a multipurpose room at the high school, construct an Adult Education Center, rehabilitate and expand existing facilities at Bonita Elementary, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Newman-Crows landing Unified School District be authorized to issue $11.35 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10169, "fingerprint": "2000|200000494|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000494|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "7a43ef809679ed37", "measure_id": "200000494", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City's existing Transient Occupancy Tax rate be increased from nine (9) percent to eleven (11) percent, shall the proceeds of such a tax rate increase be placed into a special fund to be used for a City contribution of seven million five hundred thousand dollars ($7,500,000) for a perfoming arts center and for no other purpose, and shall the tax rate immediately revert to nine (9) percent once the City's contribution has been paid in full?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21902, "no_votes": 25771, "total_votes": 47673, "percent_yes": 45.942147546829446, "percent_no": 54.057852453170554, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.671577", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.031433", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City's existing Transient Occupancy Tax rate be increased from nine (9) percent to eleven (11) percent, shall the proceeds of such a tax rate increase be placed into a special fund to be used for a City contribution of seven million five hundred thousand dollars ($7,500,000) for a perfoming arts center and for no other purpose, and shall the tax rate immediately revert to nine (9) percent once the City's contribution has been paid in full?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10171, "fingerprint": "2000|200000183|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000183|SUTTER", "content_hash": "79843ba51b226af4", "measure_id": "200000183", "measure_letter": "UU", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall approval be given to Resolution No. 99-29 of the Sutter County Board of Supervisors?  The resolution annually imposes a special parcel tax to pay for maintenance of Happy Park, beginning with fiscal year 1999-2000.  For the first year the tax is $27.94.  For each subsequent year, the board determines the tax subject to a cap of $27.94 increased annually by 2% compound interest.  The tax will replace assessments previously levied.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 541, "no_votes": 331, "total_votes": 872, "percent_yes": 62.04128440366973, "percent_no": 37.95871559633027, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-16", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.672113", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.031824", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall approval be given to Resolution No. 99-29 of the Sutter County Board of Supervisors?  The resolution annually imposes a special parcel tax to pay for maintenance of Happy Park, beginning with fiscal year 1999-2000.  For the first year the tax is $27.94.  For each subsequent year, the board determines the tax subject to a cap of $27.94 increased annually by 2% compound interest.  The tax will replace assessments previously levied.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10173, "fingerprint": "2000|200000185|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000185|SUTTER", "content_hash": "f405a5781d1d5be9", "measure_id": "200000185", "measure_letter": "VV", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve, renovate, construct, and replace local school buildings, upgrade classrooms for new technologies, and meet mandated safety requirements, shall the Marcum-Illinois Union School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $770,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 116, "no_votes": 89, "total_votes": 205, "percent_yes": 56.58536585365853, "percent_no": 43.41463414634147, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-16", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.672696", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.032187", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve, renovate, construct, and replace local school buildings, upgrade classrooms for new technologies, and meet mandated safety requirements, shall the Marcum-Illinois Union School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $770,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10172, "fingerprint": "2000|200000184|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000184|SUTTER", "content_hash": "11ab29194b5bc0db", "measure_id": "200000184", "measure_letter": "WW", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve, renovate, construct, and replace local school buildings, upgrade classrooms for new technologies, and meet mandated safety requirements, shall the East Nicolaus Joint Union High School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $1,200,000, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 399, "no_votes": 159, "total_votes": 558, "percent_yes": 71.50537634408603, "percent_no": 28.49462365591397, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-16", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.672380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.032004", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve, renovate, construct, and replace local school buildings, upgrade classrooms for new technologies, and meet mandated safety requirements, shall the East Nicolaus Joint Union High School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $1,200,000, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10174, "fingerprint": "2000|200000291|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000291|SUTTER", "content_hash": "19defd477128d4ee", "measure_id": "200000291", "measure_letter": "XX", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance providing for a ten percent (10%) surcharge on the occupancy of hotels, motels, and other lodging facilities located in the unincorporated area of Sutter County be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12695, "no_votes": 12557, "total_votes": 25252, "percent_yes": 50.27324568351021, "percent_no": 49.72675431648979, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.672998", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.032367", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance providing for a ten percent (10%) surcharge on the occupancy of hotels, motels, and other lodging facilities located in the unincorporated area of Sutter County be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10175, "fingerprint": "2000|200000495|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000495|SUTTER", "content_hash": "1ed032fc8877fc58", "measure_id": "200000495", "measure_letter": "YY", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the hotel/motel surcharge of 6 percent on the hotel/motel room rate for rent charged by the operator be increased to 10 percent in the City of Yuba City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5312, "no_votes": 4803, "total_votes": 10115, "percent_yes": 52.516065249629264, "percent_no": 47.483934750370736, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.673270", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.032546", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the hotel/motel surcharge of 6 percent on the hotel/motel room rate for rent charged by the operator be increased to 10 percent in the City of Yuba City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1122, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1100|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1100|Statewide", "content_hash": "59bf1d603aec8935", "measure_id": "CA1100", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Murder. BART and CSU Peace Officers. Legislative Initiative Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.59999847, "percent_no": 26.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized BART police officers and California State University ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized BART police officers and California State University peace officers to investigate homicides and gave them full peace officer powers for murder cases occurring within their jurisdictions.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1121, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1099|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1099|Statewide", "content_hash": "2bcdb521c2a6a913", "measure_id": "CA1099", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Murder: Special Circumstances. Legislative Initiative Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.59999847, "percent_no": 27.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure modified California's death penalty law by expanding the ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure modified California's death penalty law by expanding the list of special circumstances that make a murder case eligible for capital punishment, including murder for financial gain, murder by a gang member, and murder of multiple victims.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1120, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1098|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1098|Statewide", "content_hash": "9291c9c264670253", "measure_id": "CA1098", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 32", "description": "Veterans' Bond Act of 2000", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.0, "percent_no": 33.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 32", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_32_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2032%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2032%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1119, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1097|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1097|Statewide", "content_hash": "5c62ef2bb061d997", "measure_id": "CA1097", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection, and Flood Protection Bond Act.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.80000305, "percent_no": 35.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund projects rela...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund projects related to safe drinking water, clean water systems, watershed protection, and flood protection infrastructure. The bond act provided funding for water-related environmental and safety improvements throughout California.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1118, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1096|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1096|Statewide", "content_hash": "81be99c88212ef29", "measure_id": "CA1096", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1A", "description": "Gambling on Tribal Lands. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.5, "percent_no": 35.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries | State-Tribal Relations\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the California Constitution to allow federally recognize...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the California Constitution to allow federally recognized Indian tribes to operate casino games including slot machines, lottery games, and banking and percentage card games on tribal lands. It ratified existing tribal gaming compacts and authorized the governor to negotiate additional compacts with tribes for casino gaming.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1A", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1A_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201A%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201A%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1117, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1095|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1095|Statewide", "content_hash": "57d9ea090d5a654c", "measure_id": "CA1095", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. (The Villaraigosa-Keeley Act)", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.20000076, "percent_no": 36.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized $2", "summary_text": "The measure authorized $2.1 billion in bonds to fund park improvements, water quality projects, air pollution reduction programs, and coastal protection initiatives throughout California. The bond proceeds were allocated across various environmental and recreational programs including state and local parks, watershed protection, and clean air transportation projects.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1116, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1094|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1094|Statewide", "content_hash": "85e1bc00abc4749f", "measure_id": "CA1094", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Veterans Homes Bond Act of 2000.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.29999924, "percent_no": 37.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in general obligation bonds to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, and furnishing of veterans homes and related facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1115, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1093|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1093|Statewide", "content_hash": "b44cf31e5c101387", "measure_id": "CA1093", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Juvenile Crime. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.09999847, "percent_no": 37.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Juvenile Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure expanded the circumstances under which juveniles aged 14 and old...", "summary_text": "This measure expanded the circumstances under which juveniles aged 14 and older could be tried as adults in criminal court, particularly for serious violent felonies and gang-related crimes. It also increased penalties for gang-related activities and crimes committed on school grounds.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1114, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1092|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1092|Statewide", "content_hash": "e0f755d63e4682f6", "measure_id": "CA1092", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Limit on Marriages. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.40000153, "percent_no": 38.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure added a statute defining marriage in California as only between ...", "summary_text": "This measure added a statute defining marriage in California as only between a man and a woman. It prohibited the state from recognizing same-sex marriages.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1113, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1091|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1091|Statewide", "content_hash": "4abd28d4ae805f29", "measure_id": "CA1091", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 36", "description": "Drugs. Probation and Treatment Program. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.0, "percent_no": 39.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative required that adults convicted of non-violent drug possession...", "summary_text": "This initiative required that adults convicted of non-violent drug possession offenses receive probation and drug treatment instead of incarceration for their first and second offenses. The measure prohibited judges from sentencing these offenders to jail or prison unless they violated probation or were convicted of additional non-drug crimes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 36", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_36_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2036%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2036%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1112, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1090|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1090|Statewide", "content_hash": "1abfd86214856f0d", "measure_id": "CA1090", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 34", "description": "Campaign Contributions and Spending. Limits. Disclosure. Legislative Initiative Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.0, "percent_no": 39.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established campaign contribution limits for candidates and ball...", "summary_text": "This measure established campaign contribution limits for candidates and ballot measure committees, required disclosure of campaign donors and expenditures, and created enforcement mechanisms including penalties for violations. The initiative also restricted certain types of campaign contributions from corporations, labor unions, and other entities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 34", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_34_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2034%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2034%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1111, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1089|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1089|Statewide", "content_hash": "b28d37a8512a182f", "measure_id": "CA1089", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.0, "percent_no": 41.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized $2", "summary_text": "This measure authorized $2.1 billion in bonds for public library construction, renovation, and equipment purchases, as well as literacy programs and reading improvement initiatives. The funds would be distributed through grants and loans to local governments and library districts for upgrading library facilities and services.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1110, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1088|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1088|Statewide", "content_hash": "011af70bf03aa6dd", "measure_id": "CA1088", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Lotteries. Charitable Raffles. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.70000076, "percent_no": 41.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows the state lottery to offer prizes of merchandise and serv...", "summary_text": "This measure allows the state lottery to offer prizes of merchandise and services in addition to cash prizes, and permits charitable and nonprofit organizations to conduct raffles.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1109, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1087|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1087|Statewide", "content_hash": "22f15a74bef83d62", "measure_id": "CA1087", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 35", "description": "Public Works Projects. Use of Private Contractors for Engineering and Architectural Services. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.0, "percent_no": 45.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Local Government | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed private contractors to provide engineering and architect...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed private contractors to provide engineering and architectural services on public works projects in California, removing previous restrictions that limited such services to government employees. The constitutional amendment and statute change expanded the state's ability to hire private firms for design and engineering work on public construction projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 35", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_35_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2035%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2035%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1108, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1086|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1086|Statewide", "content_hash": "b7db45da36122959", "measure_id": "CA1086", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 29", "description": "1998 Indian Gaming Compacts. Referendum Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.09999847, "percent_no": 46.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries | State-Tribal Relations\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure approved gaming compacts between the state of California ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure approved gaming compacts between the state of California and Native American tribes that had been negotiated in 1998, allowing tribal casinos to operate slot machines and other casino games on tribal lands. The measure ratified specific agreements that established the legal framework for expanded tribal gaming operations in California.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 29", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_29_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2029%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2029%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1107, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1085|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1085|Statewide", "content_hash": "24e012a16b06eeac", "measure_id": "CA1085", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "California State Lottery. Allocation for Instructional Materials. Legislative Initiative Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.0, "percent_no": 47.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed | Education: PreK-12 | Gambling & Lotteries\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure amended California law to require that a portion of state...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure amended California law to require that a portion of state lottery revenues be specifically allocated for purchasing instructional materials for public schools. The measure changed how lottery education funds could be used, directing them toward classroom resources rather than allowing broader educational spending discretion.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1106, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1084|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1084|Statewide", "content_hash": "51a3b8a0d490f8b1", "measure_id": "CA1084", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 39", "description": "School Facilities. 55% Local Vote. Bonds, Taxes. Accountability Requirements. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.0, "percent_no": 47.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Elections | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure lowered the voter approval threshold for local school dis...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure lowered the voter approval threshold for local school district bond measures from two-thirds to 55% and established accountability requirements for how bond funds are spent. It allowed school districts to more easily issue bonds for school construction and renovation projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 39", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_39_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2039%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2039%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1105, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1083|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1083|Statewide", "content_hash": "d94f5185be050143", "measure_id": "CA1083", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 26", "description": "School Facilities. Local Majority Vote. Bonds, Taxes. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.70000076, "percent_no": 51.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12 | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have allowed local school districts to approve bond...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have allowed local school districts to approve bonds for school construction and repairs with a simple majority vote rather than the two-thirds vote previously required. It also would have permitted local communities to approve certain taxes for school facilities with a 55% majority vote instead of a two-thirds majority.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 26", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_26_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2026%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2026%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1104, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1082|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1082|Statewide", "content_hash": "cebccb1ede529a6e", "measure_id": "CA1082", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 37", "description": "Fees. Vote Requirements. Taxes. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.0, "percent_no": 52.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment would have required a two-thirds vote of the el...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment would have required a two-thirds vote of the electorate to approve any new or increased state or local taxes, and would have required a two-thirds vote of the legislature or local governing body to approve any new or increased fees. The measure failed with 48% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 37", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_37_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2037%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2037%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1103, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1081|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1081|Statewide", "content_hash": "171544e50c8d2cf4", "measure_id": "CA1081", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "The Hertzberg-Polanco Crime Laboratories Construction Bond Act of 1999.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.29999924, "percent_no": 53.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construct...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construction and renovation of crime laboratories and related facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through the state's general fund.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1102, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1080|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1080|Statewide", "content_hash": "fe32cfcbd748e727", "measure_id": "CA1080", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 27", "description": "Elections. Term Limit Declarations for Congressional Candidates. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.40000153, "percent_no": 59.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Federal Government | Term Limits\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required congressional candidates in California to de...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required congressional candidates in California to declare their position on congressional term limits on the ballot, with those supporting term limits receiving a designation like \"SUPPORTS TERM LIMITS\" and those opposing or refusing to pledge receiving designations like \"OPPOSES TERM LIMITS.\" The measure aimed to inform voters about candidates' stances on limiting congressional terms to help influence voting decisions.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 27", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_27_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2027%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2027%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1101, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1079|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1079|Statewide", "content_hash": "ef1bf660d605e2cd", "measure_id": "CA1079", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 33", "description": "Legislature: Participation in Public Employees' Retirement System. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.0, "percent_no": 61.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required the California Legislature to participate in...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required the California Legislature to participate in the state's Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) rather than maintaining their separate retirement system. It sought to align legislative retirement benefits with those of other state employees.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 33", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_33_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2033%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2033%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1100, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1078|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1078|Statewide", "content_hash": "edf728f34253c829", "measure_id": "CA1078", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "\"None of the Above\" Ballot Option. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.0, "percent_no": 64.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have added a \"None of the Above\" option to ballots for all...", "summary_text": "This measure would have added a \"None of the Above\" option to ballots for all candidate elections in California. If \"None of the Above\" received the most votes in an election, a new election would be held with different candidates.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1099, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1077|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1077|Statewide", "content_hash": "f9a805221eb94cd6", "measure_id": "CA1077", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 25", "description": "Election Campaigns. Contributions and Spending Limits. Public Financing. Disclosures. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.70000076, "percent_no": 65.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established contribution limits for election campaign...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established contribution limits for election campaigns, provided public financing for candidates who meet certain requirements, and required additional disclosure of campaign finances. It would have imposed spending limits on publicly financed candidates and created stricter reporting requirements for campaign contributions and expenditures.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 25", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_25_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2025%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2025%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1098, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1076|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1076|Statewide", "content_hash": "ad306933cfc8ac06", "measure_id": "CA1076", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 30", "description": "Insurance Claims Practices. Civil Remedies. Referendum Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.5, "percent_no": 68.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed policyholders to sue insurance companies for ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed policyholders to sue insurance companies for punitive damages when claims are unreasonably delayed or denied, and would have established additional civil remedies for unfair insurance practices. The measure failed with 31.5% support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 30", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_30_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2030%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2030%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1097, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1075|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1075|Statewide", "content_hash": "32b513519c8f4aa6", "measure_id": "CA1075", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 38", "description": "School Vouchers. State-Funded Private and Religious Education. Public School Funding. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 29.0, "percent_no": 71.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have established a state-funded school voucher prog...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have established a state-funded school voucher program allowing parents to use public money toward private or religious school tuition. The measure would have provided vouchers worth at least half the per-pupil spending amount that public schools receive from state and local sources.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 38", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_38_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2038%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2038%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1096, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1074|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1074|Statewide", "content_hash": "4887fb50c81be2a4", "measure_id": "CA1074", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 31", "description": "Insurance Claims Practices. Civil Remedy Amendments. Referendum Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 28.29999924, "percent_no": 71.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended state law to allow insurance policyholders to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended state law to allow insurance policyholders to seek civil remedies and damages when insurance companies engage in unfair claims settlement practices. It would have expanded the legal options available to consumers who believe their insurance claims were improperly denied, delayed, or undervalued.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 31", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_31_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2031%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2031%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1095, "fingerprint": "2000|CA1073|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|CA1073|Statewide", "content_hash": "7497e966d16cbcd4", "measure_id": "CA1073", "measure_letter": null, "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 28", "description": "Repeal of Proposition 10 Tobacco Surtax. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.79999924, "percent_no": 72.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Health | Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have repealed Proposition 10, which imposed a 50-cent per ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have repealed Proposition 10, which imposed a 50-cent per pack tax on cigarettes and equivalent taxes on other tobacco products to fund early childhood development programs. The initiative sought to eliminate the tobacco surtax that had been approved by voters in 1998.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 28", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_28_(2000)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/2000/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=2000", "confidence": "high", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2028%202000", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2028%202000", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 10176, "fingerprint": "2000|200000292|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000292|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "80d1ded0920a7054", "measure_id": "200000292", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article IV, Section 2 of the Charter of Tehama County be amended to read: \"From and after January 1, 2001 the salary of each member of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Tehama shall be $2,000 per month.\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7706, "no_votes": 11427, "total_votes": 19133, "percent_yes": 40.275962995871, "percent_no": 59.724037004129, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.673574", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.032729", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article IV, Section 2 of the Charter of Tehama County be amended to read: \"From and after January 1, 2001 the salary of each member of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Tehama shall be $2,000 per month.\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10177, "fingerprint": "2000|200000293|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000293|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "e726798182b1f8b3", "measure_id": "200000293", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Charter of Tehama County be amended by adding a new section being Article IV, Section 2(a) that reads: \"Notwithstanding Article IV, Section 2 of this Charter, from and after February 1, 2002, the salary of each member of the Board of Supervisors shall be annually adjusted by the lesser of the average of the salary increases granted to Tehama County employees in the prior calendar year, or the change occurring in the prior calendar year in the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI-U).\"?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7246, "no_votes": 11495, "total_votes": 18741, "percent_yes": 38.66389200149405, "percent_no": 61.33610799850595, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.673849", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.032911", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of Tehama County be amended by adding a new section being Article IV, Section 2(a) that reads: \"Notwithstanding Article IV, Section 2 of this Charter, from and after February 1, 2002, the salary of each member of the Board of Supervisors shall be annually adjusted by the lesser of the average of the salary increases granted to Tehama County employees in the prior calendar year, or the change occurring in the prior calendar year in the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI-U).\"?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10180, "fingerprint": "2000|200000165|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000165|TULARE", "content_hash": "b66af05572c68d0e", "measure_id": "200000165", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District incur a bonded indebtedness not exceeding Thirty One Million Dollars ($31,000,000) to acquire and construct three new school sites including a K-8 elementary school in Reedley, a K-8 elementary school in Orange Cove, and a magnet high school in Orange Cove at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit and subject to all the accountability requirements of Article XIII A, Section 1 of the California Constitution as amended?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 82, "no_votes": 94, "total_votes": 176, "percent_yes": 46.590909090909086, "percent_no": 53.409090909090914, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-04-11", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.674729", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.033461", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District incur a bonded indebtedness not exceeding Thirty One Million Dollars ($31,000,000) to acquire and construct three new school sites including a K-8 elementary school in Reedley, a K-8 elementary school in Orange Cove, and a magnet high school in Orange Cove at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit and subject to all the accountability requirements of Article XIII A, Section 1 of the California Constitution as amended?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10179, "fingerprint": "2000|200000147|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000147|TULARE", "content_hash": "961003302639ba5e", "measure_id": "200000147", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, build a new Science Center and expand support facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30558, "no_votes": 15859, "total_votes": 46417, "percent_yes": 65.83363853760476, "percent_no": 34.166361462395244, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.674429", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.033275", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, build a new Science Center and expand support facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10178, "fingerprint": "2000|200000109|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000109|TULARE", "content_hash": "8100147a1629d9e9", "measure_id": "200000109", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the \"Charter\" proposed for the City of Woodlake be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 451, "no_votes": 159, "total_votes": 610, "percent_yes": 73.9344262295082, "percent_no": 26.065573770491795, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.674118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.033090", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \"Charter\" proposed for the City of Woodlake be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10181, "fingerprint": "2000|200000213|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000213|TULARE", "content_hash": "e283cb1d3c15dae4", "measure_id": "200000213", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, modernize all existing schools, provide health and safety improvements, upgrade plumbing, heating and electrical systems, construct additional permanent classrooms and student support facilities, and make the District eligible to receive over $7 million in State-matching funds, shall the Lindsay Unified School District be authorized to issue $8,910,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 799, "no_votes": 490, "total_votes": 1289, "percent_yes": 61.986035686578745, "percent_no": 38.013964313421255, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-06-06", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.674999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.033645", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, modernize all existing schools, provide health and safety improvements, upgrade plumbing, heating and electrical systems, construct additional permanent classrooms and student support facilities, and make the District eligible to receive over $7 million in State-matching funds, shall the Lindsay Unified School District be authorized to issue $8,910,000 of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10182, "fingerprint": "2000|200000557|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000557|TULARE", "content_hash": "961003302639ba5e", "measure_id": "200000557", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, build a new Science Center and expand support facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37484, "no_votes": 25214, "total_votes": 62698, "percent_yes": 59.78500111646304, "percent_no": 40.21499888353696, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.675267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.033829", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide greater access to the College of the Sequoias' educational opportunities by building two full-service educational centers including a Center for Agricultural Science and Technology, repair and renovate classrooms and facilities, provide handicapped access, give students increased access to computers for job training, build and acquire new classrooms and facilities, build a new Science Center and expand support facilities, shall the College of the Sequoias issue $49.2 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10183, "fingerprint": "2000|200000558|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000558|TULARE", "content_hash": "eef2b8166fd251fe", "measure_id": "200000558", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Liberty School District be authorized to issue $1,200,000 of bonds at the lowest legal interest rate: To provide additional classrooms and a multi-purpose room, useable for a cafeteria, indoor physical education, student plays, talent shows, graduations and community events.  To improve school loading zones providing a safe environment for students to enter and leave campus.  To upgrade outdated school facilities, improve learning standards and increase our students' ability to compete in higher education?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 518, "no_votes": 224, "total_votes": 742, "percent_yes": 69.81132075471697, "percent_no": 30.188679245283026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.675578", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.034009", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Liberty School District be authorized to issue $1,200,000 of bonds at the lowest legal interest rate: To provide additional classrooms and a multi-purpose room, useable for a cafeteria, indoor physical education, student plays, talent shows, graduations and community events.  To improve school loading zones providing a safe environment for students to enter and leave campus.  To upgrade outdated school facilities, improve learning standards and increase our students' ability to compete in higher education?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10184, "fingerprint": "2000|200000030|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000030|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "afbcafdec505e78d", "measure_id": "200000030", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(ADVISORY)  THIS MEASURE DOES NOT INCREASE TAXES.  Shall any new voter-approved sales tax fund these transportation and safety improvements by implementing projects within twelve years (and limiting funding of administrative expenses to 1%)?  Fix streets and roads, potholes; make street safety improvements; complete repairs and renovations to major streets and roads; replace fire equipment and make other improvements for the Tuolumne County Fire Department; increase public safety equipment and personnel for the City of Sonora.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12988, "no_votes": 5477, "total_votes": 18465, "percent_yes": 70.3384782020038, "percent_no": 29.6615217979962, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.675878", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.034188", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  THIS MEASURE DOES NOT INCREASE TAXES.  Shall any new voter-approved sales tax fund these transportation and safety improvements by implementing projects within twelve years (and limiting funding of administrative expenses to 1%)?  Fix streets and roads, potholes; make street safety improvements; complete repairs and renovations to major streets and roads; replace fire equipment and make other improvements for the Tuolumne County Fire Department; increase public safety equipment and personnel for the City of Sonora.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10185, "fingerprint": "2000|200000031|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000031|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "9e2d1fef753bc911", "measure_id": "200000031", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a 1/2 cent sales tax for general governmental purposes, with the following mandatory restrictions?  The sales tax shall expire after ten years.  All tax proceeds shall be expended or encumbered within twelve years.  The County Auditor-Controller, and independent elected official will conduct yearly audits of these sales tax expenditures.  These expenditures will also be audited by an independent auditor.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6061, "no_votes": 12607, "total_votes": 18668, "percent_yes": 32.46732376258838, "percent_no": 67.53267623741162, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.676180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.034371", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a 1/2 cent sales tax for general governmental purposes, with the following mandatory restrictions?  The sales tax shall expire after ten years.  All tax proceeds shall be expended or encumbered within twelve years.  The County Auditor-Controller, and independent elected official will conduct yearly audits of these sales tax expenditures.  These expenditures will also be audited by an independent auditor.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10186, "fingerprint": "2000|200000294|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000294|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "9dbc87bda4800e98", "measure_id": "200000294", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a special tax be imposed for park and recreation improvements on each parcel within the District in the amount of Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) per parcel, per year, for each year beginning July 1, 2001 and continuing through June 30, 2016?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 485, "no_votes": 303, "total_votes": 788, "percent_yes": 61.54822335025381, "percent_no": 38.45177664974619, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.676476", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.034554", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax be imposed for park and recreation improvements on each parcel within the District in the amount of Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) per parcel, per year, for each year beginning July 1, 2001 and continuing through June 30, 2016?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10189, "fingerprint": "2000|200000149|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000149|VENTURA", "content_hash": "7a7308bf20e3184d", "measure_id": "200000149", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and renovate every school in Santa Paula Elementary School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, replace classroom heating/ventilation systems, upgrade classroom electrical systems for computers and modern technology, repair and replace leaky roofs, build new permanent classrooms and facilities, and upgrade classroom communication systems for improved student safety, shall the District issue $10 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as no bond money is spent on administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3926, "no_votes": 972, "total_votes": 4898, "percent_yes": 80.15516537362188, "percent_no": 19.844834626378116, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.677289", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.035098", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and renovate every school in Santa Paula Elementary School District, make the District eligible for State matching funds, replace classroom heating/ventilation systems, upgrade classroom electrical systems for computers and modern technology, repair and replace leaky roofs, build new permanent classrooms and facilities, and upgrade classroom communication systems for improved student safety, shall the District issue $10 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as no bond money is spent on administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10188, "fingerprint": "2000|200000148|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000148|VENTURA", "content_hash": "6ecf6b3463395bbf", "measure_id": "200000148", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce class size, enhance student safety and provide students with new classrooms to relieve overcrowding by constructing a new neighborhood elementary school, upgrade electrical wiring in existing classrooms and libraries for computer use, rapair school facilities, and obtain eligibility for State school funding, shall the Fillmore Unified School District issue $7.5 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2369, "no_votes": 1331, "total_votes": 3700, "percent_yes": 64.02702702702703, "percent_no": 35.97297297297297, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.677021", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.034919", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce class size, enhance student safety and provide students with new classrooms to relieve overcrowding by constructing a new neighborhood elementary school, upgrade electrical wiring in existing classrooms and libraries for computer use, rapair school facilities, and obtain eligibility for State school funding, shall the Fillmore Unified School District issue $7.5 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10187, "fingerprint": "2000|200000032|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000032|VENTURA", "content_hash": "a30d72e8756d834c", "measure_id": "200000032", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance that allows the expansion of the St. Joseph's Health and Retirement Center near Ojai, California, by approving and making effective and operative a Resolution and Ordinance No. 4201 of the Board of Supervisors of Ventura County (both adopted October 19, 1999), which will amend the Ventura County General Plan, the Ojai Valley Area Plan, and the Ventura County Zoning Ordinance, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125341, "no_votes": 46476, "total_votes": 171817, "percent_yes": 72.95029013427077, "percent_no": 27.049709865729227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.676746", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.034735", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance that allows the expansion of the St. Joseph's Health and Retirement Center near Ojai, California, by approving and making effective and operative a Resolution and Ordinance No. 4201 of the Board of Supervisors of Ventura County (both adopted October 19, 1999), which will amend the Ventura County General Plan, the Ojai Valley Area Plan, and the Ventura County Zoning Ordinance, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10194, "fingerprint": "2000|200000499|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000499|VENTURA", "content_hash": "7985ea374f35b313", "measure_id": "200000499", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The people of the City of Santa Paula do ordain as follows: That the Santa Paula General Plan be amended to establish a City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) which will include the East Area 2 and Fagan Canyon of the General Plan Expansion Areas adopted April 13, 1998, but exclude East Area 1, Adams Canyon, West Area 2, and South Mountain.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4035, "no_votes": 3368, "total_votes": 7403, "percent_yes": 54.504930433608, "percent_no": 45.495069566392, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.678744", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.036011", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The people of the City of Santa Paula do ordain as follows: That the Santa Paula General Plan be amended to establish a City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) which will include the East Area 2 and Fagan Canyon of the General Plan Expansion Areas adopted April 13, 1998, but exclude East Area 1, Adams Canyon, West Area 2, and South Mountain.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10191, "fingerprint": "2000|200000496|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000496|VENTURA", "content_hash": "6564af27251ccafb", "measure_id": "200000496", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Fillmore adopt an ordinance which establishes a City Urban Restriction Boundary which does not include all areas within the existing approved sphere of influence or even all those lands within the City's corporate limits and requires a vote of the City residents prior to City approval of urbanization outside of that boundary?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1624, "no_votes": 2251, "total_votes": 3875, "percent_yes": 41.90967741935484, "percent_no": 58.09032258064516, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.677857", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.035464", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Fillmore adopt an ordinance which establishes a City Urban Restriction Boundary which does not include all areas within the existing approved sphere of influence or even all those lands within the City's corporate limits and requires a vote of the City residents prior to City approval of urbanization outside of that boundary?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10192, "fingerprint": "2000|200000497|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000497|VENTURA", "content_hash": "8d9a6767cae7bda0", "measure_id": "200000497", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fillmore adopt an ordinance which establishes a City Urban Growth Boundary which includes the City's corporate limits, the Goodenough Road area, and the City's approved 1990 sphere of influence (excluding the State Fish Hatchery and adjacent southerly property connecting to the Santa Clara River) plus an additional 145 acres and requires a vote of the City residents prior to City approval of urbanization outside of that boundary?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1412, "no_votes": 2251, "total_votes": 3663, "percent_yes": 38.54763854763854, "percent_no": 61.45236145236146, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.678207", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.035646", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fillmore adopt an ordinance which establishes a City Urban Growth Boundary which includes the City's corporate limits, the Goodenough Road area, and the City's approved 1990 sphere of influence (excluding the State Fish Hatchery and adjacent southerly property connecting to the Santa Clara River) plus an additional 145 acres and requires a vote of the City residents prior to City approval of urbanization outside of that boundary?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10193, "fingerprint": "2000|200000498|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000498|VENTURA", "content_hash": "c083ba7a2e296ea1", "measure_id": "200000498", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Measure M be enacted to amend the City's Comprehenzive Plan to change the land use designation of the Thille Ranch Property at the northwest corner of Telephone and Kimball Roads from Agricultural (\"A\") to Parks (\"P\")?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23012, "no_votes": 19424, "total_votes": 42436, "percent_yes": 54.22754265246489, "percent_no": 45.77245734753511, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.678478", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.035831", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure M be enacted to amend the City's Comprehenzive Plan to change the land use designation of the Thille Ranch Property at the northwest corner of Telephone and Kimball Roads from Agricultural (\"A\") to Parks (\"P\")?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10190, "fingerprint": "2000|200000295|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000295|VENTURA", "content_hash": "3906a74ac6ed6930", "measure_id": "200000295", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the ordinance that would appropriate all of the County of Ventura's tobacco settlement revenue to private hospitals and others for health care and health related purposes, and that would prohibit the use of such revenue for any County medical service, (an appropriation of approximately $10 million per year) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84524, "no_votes": 179250, "total_votes": 263774, "percent_yes": 32.04409835692676, "percent_no": 67.95590164307325, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.677557", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.035282", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance that would appropriate all of the County of Ventura's tobacco settlement revenue to private hospitals and others for health care and health related purposes, and that would prohibit the use of such revenue for any County medical service, (an appropriation of approximately $10 million per year) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10202, "fingerprint": "2000|200000151|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000151|YOLO", "content_hash": "cf84e96112ee637a", "measure_id": "200000151", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Pierce Joint Unified School District and for the election of each member of the governing board of the Pierce Joint Unified School District by the registered voters of the entire Pierce Joint Unifed School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 104, "no_votes": 115, "total_votes": 219, "percent_yes": 47.48858447488584, "percent_no": 52.51141552511416, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.681069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.037452", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the abolition of trustee areas in the Pierce Joint Unified School District and for the election of each member of the governing board of the Pierce Joint Unified School District by the registered voters of the entire Pierce Joint Unifed School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10196, "fingerprint": "2000|200000111|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000111|YOLO", "content_hash": "3ed9e5df5ccb6a62", "measure_id": "200000111", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  If Measure H below is approved, should the proceeds fund a new police station?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7425, "no_votes": 3891, "total_votes": 11316, "percent_yes": 65.61505832449629, "percent_no": 34.38494167550371, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.679279", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.036375", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  If Measure H below is approved, should the proceeds fund a new police station?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10197, "fingerprint": "2000|200000112|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000112|YOLO", "content_hash": "35bc296127fc8e5a", "measure_id": "200000112", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  If Measure H below is approved, should the proceeds fund the repair and rehabilitation of city roads?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9099, "no_votes": 2257, "total_votes": 11356, "percent_yes": 80.12504402958788, "percent_no": 19.874955970412117, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.679542", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.036553", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  If Measure H below is approved, should the proceeds fund the repair and rehabilitation of city roads?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10198, "fingerprint": "2000|200000113|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000113|YOLO", "content_hash": "2a725816d1ae8574", "measure_id": "200000113", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  If Measure H below is approved, should the proceeds fund a new Community/Senior Center?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6685, "no_votes": 4475, "total_votes": 11160, "percent_yes": 59.90143369175627, "percent_no": 40.09856630824373, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.679809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.036733", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  If Measure H below is approved, should the proceeds fund a new Community/Senior Center?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10199, "fingerprint": "2000|200000114|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000114|YOLO", "content_hash": "f90d2f1ad11d93ba", "measure_id": "200000114", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "(ADVISORY)  If Measure H below is approved, should the proceeds fund new softball and soccer facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5753, "no_votes": 5365, "total_votes": 11118, "percent_yes": 51.744918150746535, "percent_no": 48.255081849253465, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.680131", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.036911", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(ADVISORY)  If Measure H below is approved, should the proceeds fund new softball and soccer facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10200, "fingerprint": "2000|200000115|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000115|YOLO", "content_hash": "a4c1d66eef9e4431", "measure_id": "200000115", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Woodland enact a one-half cent sales tax for city facilities, services and programs, with the following mandatory restrictions: This sales tax will expire after six years on July 1, 2006.  The citizens shall receive annually a published report of income and expenditures.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7788, "no_votes": 4151, "total_votes": 11939, "percent_yes": 65.23159393584052, "percent_no": 34.76840606415948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.680398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.037089", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Woodland enact a one-half cent sales tax for city facilities, services and programs, with the following mandatory restrictions: This sales tax will expire after six years on July 1, 2006.  The citizens shall receive annually a published report of income and expenditures.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10201, "fingerprint": "2000|200000150|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000150|YOLO", "content_hash": "5c4b92079b1dd5a0", "measure_id": "200000150", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19826, "no_votes": 6339, "total_votes": 26165, "percent_yes": 75.77297917064782, "percent_no": 24.227020829352185, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.680683", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.037268", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10195, "fingerprint": "2000|200000110|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000110|YOLO", "content_hash": "ba07465fd837f6c0", "measure_id": "200000110", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the \"Citizen's Right to Vote in Future Use of Open Space and Agricultural Lands Ordinance\" (Ordinance No. 2008), be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10386, "no_votes": 8971, "total_votes": 19357, "percent_yes": 53.65500852404816, "percent_no": 46.34499147595184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-03-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.679012", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.036195", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \"Citizen's Right to Vote in Future Use of Open Space and Agricultural Lands Ordinance\" (Ordinance No. 2008), be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10203, "fingerprint": "2000|200000189|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000189|YOLO", "content_hash": "a12e655ece261a2b", "measure_id": "200000189", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding; construct two elementary schools; acquire land and construct a junior high school; provide adequate high school classrooms and science laboratories; improve existing schools; make health, safety and other repairs; obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the Davis Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $26,000,000 in bonds at legal rates producing the lowest overall interest costs to the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9717, "no_votes": 1645, "total_votes": 11362, "percent_yes": 85.52191515578244, "percent_no": 14.478084844217562, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-05-23", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.681437", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.037636", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding; construct two elementary schools; acquire land and construct a junior high school; provide adequate high school classrooms and science laboratories; improve existing schools; make health, safety and other repairs; obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the Davis Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue $26,000,000 in bonds at legal rates producing the lowest overall interest costs to the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10206, "fingerprint": "2000|200000501|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000501|YOLO", "content_hash": "51da21735d59a74b", "measure_id": "200000501", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk for the City of Woodland be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8035, "no_votes": 6846, "total_votes": 14881, "percent_yes": 53.995027215912906, "percent_no": 46.004972784087094, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.682241", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.038184", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk for the City of Woodland be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10207, "fingerprint": "2000|200000502|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000502|YOLO", "content_hash": "38e0f226f36122b8", "measure_id": "200000502", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer for the City of Woodland be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7715, "no_votes": 7123, "total_votes": 14838, "percent_yes": 51.99487801590511, "percent_no": 48.00512198409489, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.682513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.038362", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer for the City of Woodland be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10208, "fingerprint": "2000|200000503|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000503|YOLO", "content_hash": "47b1c7ccf6cf39a3", "measure_id": "200000503", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 79-1 be amended to permit the construction of new branch libraries as needed in the City of Woodland?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9528, "no_votes": 5406, "total_votes": 14934, "percent_yes": 63.80072318200081, "percent_no": 36.19927681799919, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.682778", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.038540", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 79-1 be amended to permit the construction of new branch libraries as needed in the City of Woodland?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10205, "fingerprint": "2000|200000500|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000500|YOLO", "content_hash": "8eb38fa814bee5d1", "measure_id": "200000500", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the \"Open Space Preservation Tax\" (Ordinance No. 2033), be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18023, "no_votes": 7558, "total_votes": 25581, "percent_yes": 70.45463429889371, "percent_no": 29.54536570110629, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.681977", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.038006", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the \"Open Space Preservation Tax\" (Ordinance No. 2033), be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10204, "fingerprint": "2000|200000296|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000296|YOLO", "content_hash": "0f7446ba47ae7319", "measure_id": "200000296", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance Amending Section 3-7.03 of the Yolo County Code to Increase the Transient Occupancy Tax Imposed within the Unincorporated Area of the County of Yolo from Eight Percent (8%) to Twelve Percent (12%) of Rent Charged by the Operator become effective?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2514, "no_votes": 4028, "total_votes": 6542, "percent_yes": 38.42861510241516, "percent_no": 61.57138489758484, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.681708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.037822", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance Amending Section 3-7.03 of the Yolo County Code to Increase the Transient Occupancy Tax Imposed within the Unincorporated Area of the County of Yolo from Eight Percent (8%) to Twelve Percent (12%) of Rent Charged by the Operator become effective?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10209, "fingerprint": "2000|200000559|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000559|YOLO", "content_hash": "51d05dad9fc932a8", "measure_id": "200000559", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities, shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25842, "no_votes": 10126, "total_votes": 35968, "percent_yes": 71.8471975088968, "percent_no": 28.152802491103202, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.683043", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.038721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms and facilities throughout Los Rios Community College District (including American River, Cosumnes River, and Sacramento City Colleges), provide up-to-date facilities for academic/vocational programs including computer science, electronics and biotechnology, upgrade libraries, build and acquire classrooms and facilities to reduce overcrowding and expand course offerings, upgrade electrical systems for technology, and build high-tech training facilities, shall the District issue $215 million of bonds at the lowest possible interest rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10210, "fingerprint": "2000|200000297|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000297|YUBA", "content_hash": "01cd89ef38e2fd70", "measure_id": "200000297", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a ten percent (10%) surcharge upon temporary lodgers in hotels, motels, and similar temporary lodging facilities be enacted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7238, "no_votes": 8278, "total_votes": 15516, "percent_yes": 46.64862077855117, "percent_no": 53.35137922144883, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.683345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.038905", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a ten percent (10%) surcharge upon temporary lodgers in hotels, motels, and similar temporary lodging facilities be enacted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Transient Occupancy Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10211, "fingerprint": "2000|200000298|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000298|YUBA", "content_hash": "fabbf24f9047b4eb", "measure_id": "200000298", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the LOMA RICA/BROWNS VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT adopt a special tax whereby THE DISTRICT may levy annually a tax related to the use of property located within THE DISTRICT, such tax to be substituting for previous benefit assessment and special taxes, not to exceed the following: $.03 per square foot, (with a minimum tax of $15.00 per residential structure and $30.00 per commercial structure) subject to annual cost of living adjustments, on the square footage of all taxable structures with a maximum cap which, after annual adjustments, may not exceed $98.00 per structure without further approval of DISTRICT voters: the special tax to be assessed and collected with the Yuba County General Taxes commencing with the fiscal year 2001-2002 and continuing thereafter, and the proceeds of such tax to be used for the purposes authorized by the Community Services District Law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 600, "no_votes": 1484, "total_votes": 2084, "percent_yes": 28.790786948176574, "percent_no": 71.20921305182343, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.683626", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.039122", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the LOMA RICA/BROWNS VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT adopt a special tax whereby THE DISTRICT may levy annually a tax related to the use of property located within THE DISTRICT, such tax to be substituting for previous benefit assessment and special taxes, not to exceed the following: $.03 per square foot, (with a minimum tax of $15.00 per residential structure and $30.00 per commercial structure) subject to annual cost of living adjustments, on the square footage of all taxable structures with a maximum cap which, after annual adjustments, may not exceed $98.00 per structure without further approval of DISTRICT voters: the special tax to be assessed and collected with the Yuba County General Taxes commencing with the fiscal year 2001-2002 and continuing thereafter, and the proceeds of such tax to be used for the purposes authorized by the Community Services District Law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10212, "fingerprint": "2000|200000299|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "2000|200000299|YUBA", "content_hash": "e147c29713d5baf7", "measure_id": "200000299", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 2000, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "EXHIBIT A  Ordinance No. 00-02 imposes an annual special tax in the amount of $40 for an unimproved parcel and $50 for an improved parcel within the territorial boundaries of the Camptonville Community Services District, the revenue from which shall be exclusively dedicated to fire protection services.  Shall Ordinance No. 00-02 be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 184, "no_votes": 72, "total_votes": 256, "percent_yes": 71.875, "percent_no": 28.125, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "2000-11-07", "decade": 2000, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.683973", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.039308", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "EXHIBIT A  Ordinance No. 00-02 imposes an annual special tax in the amount of $40 for an unimproved parcel and $50 for an improved parcel within the territorial boundaries of the Camptonville Community Services District, the revenue from which shall be exclusively dedicated to fire protection services.  Shall Ordinance No. 00-02 be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12150, "fingerprint": "1999|199900159|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900159|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "0f6356d7580fba1b", "measure_id": "199900159", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7842, "no_votes": 5698, "total_votes": 13540, "percent_yes": 57.91728212703102, "percent_no": 42.08271787296898, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.294767", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.686060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.040403", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10216, "fingerprint": "1999|199900088|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900088|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "bbcc34ee96ad9bfc", "measure_id": "199900088", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve basic academic curriculum and educational programs for the District\u2019s students, shall the Albany School District levy an additional special assessment, at the annual rate of $120 for each residential unit, and $.0241 per square foot of each nonresidential parcel, or $120, whichever is greater, beginning July 1, 1999, and annually increase the assessment by no more than the inflation rate, with an exemption for property owners age 65 or over?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2400, "no_votes": 655, "total_votes": 3055, "percent_yes": 78.55973813420621, "percent_no": 21.440261865793786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.685648", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.040209", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve basic academic curriculum and educational programs for the District\u2019s students, shall the Albany School District levy an additional special assessment, at the annual rate of $120 for each residential unit, and $.0241 per square foot of each nonresidential parcel, or $120, whichever is greater, beginning July 1, 1999, and annually increase the assessment by no more than the inflation rate, with an exemption for property owners age 65 or over?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10217, "fingerprint": "1999|199900160|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900160|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "6eb51858e2f6e7ea", "measure_id": "199900160", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the City of Livermore enact an ordinance amending the General Plan to create a new urban growth boundary, establish a new residential growth rate between 0 and 1,000 people per year, and require voter approval of certain residential housing developments of 20 units or more, certain conversions of open space land and all increases in residential density and requiring the City to withdraw from the joint planning process for North Livermore?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5449, "no_votes": 8712, "total_votes": 14161, "percent_yes": 38.47892098015676, "percent_no": 61.52107901984324, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.686362", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.040589", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the City of Livermore enact an ordinance amending the General Plan to create a new urban growth boundary, establish a new residential growth rate between 0 and 1,000 people per year, and require voter approval of certain residential housing developments of 20 units or more, certain conversions of open space land and all increases in residential density and requiring the City to withdraw from the joint planning process for North Livermore?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10218, "fingerprint": "1999|199900161|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900161|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ba29033b88955181", "measure_id": "199900161", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Newark General Plan be amended to change the land use designation of \"Area 4\" from Low Density Residential with a specific plan including provision for a golf course, recreation facilities, and open space to Conversation-Open Space and Agricultural/Resource Production-Open Space?  \"Area 4\" is bounded by Mowry Slough on the west, Mowry Avenue on the north, the railroad tracks on the east, and the Fremont border on the South.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2089, "no_votes": 3309, "total_votes": 5398, "percent_yes": 38.69951834012597, "percent_no": 61.30048165987403, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.686630", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.040774", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Newark General Plan be amended to change the land use designation of \"Area 4\" from Low Density Residential with a specific plan including provision for a golf course, recreation facilities, and open space to Conversation-Open Space and Agricultural/Resource Production-Open Space?  \"Area 4\" is bounded by Mowry Slough on the west, Mowry Avenue on the north, the railroad tracks on the east, and the Fremont border on the South.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10219, "fingerprint": "1999|199900162|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900162|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "212ed506140c0e59", "measure_id": "199900162", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the CAPP Initiative be adopted to amend the General Plan to require voter approval for development projects involving 10 or more residential units of that have commercial or office buildings that exceed 55 feet in height, and other matters as outlined in the initiative?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5487, "no_votes": 7117, "total_votes": 12604, "percent_yes": 43.53379879403364, "percent_no": 56.46620120596636, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.686897", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.040956", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the CAPP Initiative be adopted to amend the General Plan to require voter approval for development projects involving 10 or more residential units of that have commercial or office buildings that exceed 55 feet in height, and other matters as outlined in the initiative?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10220, "fingerprint": "1999|199900163|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900163|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "44574e3b74e63c81", "measure_id": "199900163", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Union City increase tourist tax imposed by Section 3.18.025 of the Union City Municipal Code on travelers occupying any hotel/motel room to 8.5% of the daily room rate to be adjusted annually according to the Consumer Price Index?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4151, "no_votes": 1975, "total_votes": 6126, "percent_yes": 67.760365654587, "percent_no": 32.239634345412995, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.687165", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.041136", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Union City increase tourist tax imposed by Section 3.18.025 of the Union City Municipal Code on travelers occupying any hotel/motel room to 8.5% of the daily room rate to be adjusted annually according to the Consumer Price Index?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10214, "fingerprint": "1999|199900023|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900023|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7094ffbe6b1a8991", "measure_id": "199900023", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District to improve the health and safety conditions of the District's facilities, Including the renovation of roofing, heating, plumbing and air-conditioning systems, the acquisition and construction of a new library and community center, and the acquisition, renovation, and construction of other necessary facilities, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $150 million with an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7744, "no_votes": 1697, "total_votes": 9441, "percent_yes": 82.02520919394132, "percent_no": 17.974790806058678, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.684751", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.039666", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District to improve the health and safety conditions of the District's facilities, Including the renovation of roofing, heating, plumbing and air-conditioning systems, the acquisition and construction of a new library and community center, and the acquisition, renovation, and construction of other necessary facilities, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $150 million with an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12149, "fingerprint": "1999|199900080|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900080|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "da7a60fae6186f21", "measure_id": "199900080", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 1769, which in accordance with the Pleasanton General Plan prezoned the Merritt property to low density residential and created a development plan of 89 single-family homes on 46 acres, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4601, "no_votes": 6695, "total_votes": 11296, "percent_yes": 40.73123229461756, "percent_no": 59.26876770538244, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.294261", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.685319", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.040031", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 1769, which in accordance with the Pleasanton General Plan prezoned the Merritt property to low density residential and created a development plan of 89 single-family homes on 46 acres, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10213, "fingerprint": "1999|199900011|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900011|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "d87141b647bb974a", "measure_id": "199900011", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the date of the city's Regular Municipal Election be changed to the first Tuesday in March of even numbered years in order to consolidate with the statewide election on the same date; and shall Sections 2.01(D) and 8.01 of the Charter of the City of Piedmont be amended and the terms of certain councilmembers and members of the Board of Education be extended for a limited number of days to conform with the change, as set forth in Resolution 66-98 adopted by the Piedmont City Council on November 16, 1998, which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1527, "no_votes": 38, "total_votes": 1565, "percent_yes": 97.57188498402556, "percent_no": 2.4281150159744413, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.684275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.039487", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the date of the city's Regular Municipal Election be changed to the first Tuesday in March of even numbered years in order to consolidate with the statewide election on the same date; and shall Sections 2.01(D) and 8.01 of the Charter of the City of Piedmont be amended and the terms of certain councilmembers and members of the Board of Education be extended for a limited number of days to conform with the change, as set forth in Resolution 66-98 adopted by the Piedmont City Council on November 16, 1998, which is on file with the Piedmont City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10215, "fingerprint": "1999|199900024|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900024|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2557c78f5753944e", "measure_id": "199900024", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Sunol Glen Unified School District, in order to repair and modernize its 40 year old existing schools, upgrade deteriorating roofs, plumbing, septic, ventilation and electrical systems, rewire classrooms for computer technology; create a modern library; repair bathrooms; renovate, and acquire classrooms and comply with current fire and safety codes, issue $2,100,000 of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 331, "no_votes": 62, "total_votes": 393, "percent_yes": 84.22391857506362, "percent_no": 15.776081424936379, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.685051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.039849", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sunol Glen Unified School District, in order to repair and modernize its 40 year old existing schools, upgrade deteriorating roofs, plumbing, septic, ventilation and electrical systems, rewire classrooms for computer technology; create a modern library; repair bathrooms; renovate, and acquire classrooms and comply with current fire and safety codes, issue $2,100,000 of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10222, "fingerprint": "1999|199900124|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900124|BUTTE", "content_hash": "54c170c63329535b", "measure_id": "199900124", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Palermo Union School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $3,000,000.00 for the purpose of raising funds for modernizing, developing, and expanding the schools and school sites within the Palermo Union School District, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 437, "no_votes": 232, "total_votes": 669, "percent_yes": 65.32137518684604, "percent_no": 34.67862481315396, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-28", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.687757", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.041499", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Palermo Union School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $3,000,000.00 for the purpose of raising funds for modernizing, developing, and expanding the schools and school sites within the Palermo Union School District, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10221, "fingerprint": "1999|199900123|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900123|BUTTE", "content_hash": "6bbd5112afe6a3bc", "measure_id": "199900123", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds for improvements to classrooms for student health and safety; to make money-saving energy efficient improvements and replace rented temporary portable classrooms; to qualify for State grants for 80% of costs to modernize all elementary schools and 50% of construction costs of a new middle school (with the balance from Measure J Bonds); and for acquisition and improvement of school property; shall the Oroville City Elementary School District issue $9,875,000 in bonds bearing interest at lawful rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1580, "no_votes": 819, "total_votes": 2399, "percent_yes": 65.86077532305127, "percent_no": 34.13922467694873, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-28", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.687433", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.041317", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds for improvements to classrooms for student health and safety; to make money-saving energy efficient improvements and replace rented temporary portable classrooms; to qualify for State grants for 80% of costs to modernize all elementary schools and 50% of construction costs of a new middle school (with the balance from Measure J Bonds); and for acquisition and improvement of school property; shall the Oroville City Elementary School District issue $9,875,000 in bonds bearing interest at lawful rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10223, "fingerprint": "1999|199900230|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900230|BUTTE", "content_hash": "2d3221c781e3b6f1", "measure_id": "199900230", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, upgrade, and renovate neighborhood classrooms and all local school sites, shall the Thermalito Union School District renovate, construct and acquire classrooms and a gymnasium for student and community activities; upgrade deteriorating roofs, restrooms, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; and wire classrooms for computer technology, with citizen oversight and independent audits, by issuing $2,300,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 802, "no_votes": 453, "total_votes": 1255, "percent_yes": 63.90438247011952, "percent_no": 36.09561752988048, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.688030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.041683", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, upgrade, and renovate neighborhood classrooms and all local school sites, shall the Thermalito Union School District renovate, construct and acquire classrooms and a gymnasium for student and community activities; upgrade deteriorating roofs, restrooms, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; and wire classrooms for computer technology, with citizen oversight and independent audits, by issuing $2,300,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10231, "fingerprint": "1999|199900232|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900232|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "223e60748ee189b2", "measure_id": "199900232", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to maintain a class size that maximizes learning for our community's children, to continue programs critical to the quality of the educational process and to attract and retain qualified and experienced employees, shall the Morga School District be authorized to levy a special tax of one hundred twenty nine dollars ($129) per year per parcel for a period of five (5) years commencing in July 1, 2000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3529, "no_votes": 1039, "total_votes": 4568, "percent_yes": 77.25481611208407, "percent_no": 22.74518388791593, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.690296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.044185", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain a class size that maximizes learning for our community's children, to continue programs critical to the quality of the educational process and to attract and retain qualified and experienced employees, shall the Morga School District be authorized to levy a special tax of one hundred twenty nine dollars ($129) per year per parcel for a period of five (5) years commencing in July 1, 2000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10225, "fingerprint": "1999|199900164|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900164|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "b8e4732fcc2e2099", "measure_id": "199900164", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council adopt an ordinance regarding local campaign finance regulations establishing campaign contribution limits, campaign contribution and expenditure disclosure requirements and a Fair Campaign Pledge?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3983, "no_votes": 1541, "total_votes": 5524, "percent_yes": 72.10354815351194, "percent_no": 27.896451846488063, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.688569", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.042581", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council adopt an ordinance regarding local campaign finance regulations establishing campaign contribution limits, campaign contribution and expenditure disclosure requirements and a Fair Campaign Pledge?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10226, "fingerprint": "1999|199900165|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900165|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "4b4466ab257f7405", "measure_id": "199900165", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council consolidate its general municipal election with the statewide general election and extend the terms of the city council, city clerk and city treasurer holding office as of December 15, 1999 by one year to coincide with the even-year election cycle?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4573, "no_votes": 995, "total_votes": 5568, "percent_yes": 82.1300287356322, "percent_no": 17.869971264367805, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.688841", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.042864", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council consolidate its general municipal election with the statewide general election and extend the terms of the city council, city clerk and city treasurer holding office as of December 15, 1999 by one year to coincide with the even-year election cycle?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10230, "fingerprint": "1999|199900231|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900231|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "e3a061c7c9bfa051", "measure_id": "199900231", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Lafayette School District, in order to prevent increases in class size in grades 4-8, avoid elimination of teaching positions, improve writing and science instruction for all students, acquire additional instructional materials, and improve technology in the classrooms, with no money being used for administrative costs, be authorized to increase the existing $84 per year parcel tax by $4.00 per month to $132 annually for a period of eight (8) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5944, "no_votes": 1997, "total_votes": 7941, "percent_yes": 74.85203374889812, "percent_no": 25.147966251101877, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.689980", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.043927", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lafayette School District, in order to prevent increases in class size in grades 4-8, avoid elimination of teaching positions, improve writing and science instruction for all students, acquire additional instructional materials, and improve technology in the classrooms, with no money being used for administrative costs, be authorized to increase the existing $84 per year parcel tax by $4.00 per month to $132 annually for a period of eight (8) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10228, "fingerprint": "1999|199900167|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900167|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "0c35343d7b21794d", "measure_id": "199900167", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the City of San Ramon adopt an initiative ordinance amending the General Plan and requiring that various land use decisions be confirmed by the voters in an election prior to becoming effective?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3635, "no_votes": 4020, "total_votes": 7655, "percent_yes": 47.48530372305682, "percent_no": 52.51469627694318, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.689440", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.043391", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the City of San Ramon adopt an initiative ordinance amending the General Plan and requiring that various land use decisions be confirmed by the voters in an election prior to becoming effective?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10229, "fingerprint": "1999|199900168|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900168|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "412d5026c79e6861", "measure_id": "199900168", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the City of San Ramon adopt an initiative ordinance: 1) Establishing a two year moratorium on amendments to the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance, and 2) Providing for the establishment of a General Plan Review Commission, consisting of at least 21 representatives of San Ramon at large and resident representatives from the business community, homeowners associations and environmental organizations, to draft during the moratorium for submission to the voters: a) a new general plan, taking into consideration the creation of urban growth boundaries to encourage smart growth boundary by promoting infill development and discouraging urban sprawl by providing mixed use of commercial, retail, education, recreation and housing, and b) to develop a plan for the acquisition of ridgeline areas and agricultural lands, contiguous to the City of San Ramon, to be preserved for open space purposes in perpetuity?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3806, "no_votes": 3649, "total_votes": 7455, "percent_yes": 51.052984574111335, "percent_no": 48.947015425888665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.689712", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.043652", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the City of San Ramon adopt an initiative ordinance: 1) Establishing a two year moratorium on amendments to the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance, and 2) Providing for the establishment of a General Plan Review Commission, consisting of at least 21 representatives of San Ramon at large and resident representatives from the business community, homeowners associations and environmental organizations, to draft during the moratorium for submission to the voters: a) a new general plan, taking into consideration the creation of urban growth boundaries to encourage smart growth boundary by promoting infill development and discouraging urban sprawl by providing mixed use of commercial, retail, education, recreation and housing, and b) to develop a plan for the acquisition of ridgeline areas and agricultural lands, contiguous to the City of San Ramon, to be preserved for open space purposes in perpetuity?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10227, "fingerprint": "1999|199900166|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900166|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "36a2c549591ff914", "measure_id": "199900166", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to permit the City Council by ordinance to authorize the City Manager, or his or her designee, to enter into contracts and incur obligations on behalf of the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2265, "no_votes": 7721, "total_votes": 9986, "percent_yes": 22.68175445623873, "percent_no": 77.31824554376126, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.689144", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.043135", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to permit the City Council by ordinance to authorize the City Manager, or his or her designee, to enter into contracts and incur obligations on behalf of the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10224, "fingerprint": "1999|199900025|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900025|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "7094ffbe6b1a8991", "measure_id": "199900025", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District to improve the health and safety conditions of the District's facilities, Including the renovation of roofing, heating, plumbing and air-conditioning systems, the acquisition and construction of a new library and community center, and the acquisition, renovation, and construction of other necessary facilities, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $150 million with an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 49, "no_votes": 28, "total_votes": 77, "percent_yes": 63.63636363636363, "percent_no": 36.36363636363637, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.688299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.042207", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District to improve the health and safety conditions of the District's facilities, Including the renovation of roofing, heating, plumbing and air-conditioning systems, the acquisition and construction of a new library and community center, and the acquisition, renovation, and construction of other necessary facilities, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $150 million with an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10233, "fingerprint": "1999|199900070|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900070|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ed884f1987a5e9d5", "measure_id": "199900070", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize local schools, repair deteriorating plumbing, heating, ventilation, cooling and electrical systems; rewire classrooms for computer technology; renovate, construct and acquire classrooms to comply with current safety and access standards and to construct new science classrooms at South Tahoe Middle School, shall the Lake Tahoe Unified School District issue $17 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3242, "no_votes": 670, "total_votes": 3912, "percent_yes": 82.87321063394683, "percent_no": 17.126789366053174, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-05-04", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.690919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.044757", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize local schools, repair deteriorating plumbing, heating, ventilation, cooling and electrical systems; rewire classrooms for computer technology; renovate, construct and acquire classrooms to comply with current safety and access standards and to construct new science classrooms at South Tahoe Middle School, shall the Lake Tahoe Unified School District issue $17 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10232, "fingerprint": "1999|199900026|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900026|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "ec5d1c0d132005ae", "measure_id": "199900026", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and rehabilitate only Lake Tahoe area schools to meet current health, safety, accessibility, technology and instructional standards, including repairing aging roofs, deteriorated plumbing, heating, cooling and electrical systems, refurbishing classrooms, restrooms, and constructing classrooms and schools facilities, shall the Lakeside area School Facility Improvement District No.2 of the Tahoe Unified School District, with citizen oversight and annual audits, issue $24 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 147, "no_votes": 86, "total_votes": 233, "percent_yes": 63.0901287553648, "percent_no": 36.9098712446352, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.690593", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.044442", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and rehabilitate only Lake Tahoe area schools to meet current health, safety, accessibility, technology and instructional standards, including repairing aging roofs, deteriorated plumbing, heating, cooling and electrical systems, refurbishing classrooms, restrooms, and constructing classrooms and schools facilities, shall the Lakeside area School Facility Improvement District No.2 of the Tahoe Unified School District, with citizen oversight and annual audits, issue $24 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10234, "fingerprint": "1999|199900169|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900169|FRESNO", "content_hash": "6789b721dd292b0d", "measure_id": "199900169", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Clovis authorize an increase of not more than three tenths of a percent (0.30%) to the City's sales and use tax to fund police and fire facilities, furnishings and equipment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5219, "no_votes": 2367, "total_votes": 7586, "percent_yes": 68.79778539414711, "percent_no": 31.202214605852888, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.691219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.045040", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Clovis authorize an increase of not more than three tenths of a percent (0.30%) to the City's sales and use tax to fund police and fire facilities, furnishings and equipment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10235, "fingerprint": "1999|199900170|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900170|FRESNO", "content_hash": "3a31b756ebb94041", "measure_id": "199900170", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "This measure is not a tax.  It is an advisory measure which states the Fowler City voters preference that any new voter-approved utility users tax be used only to fund the City of Fowler Fire and Police Departments to help ensure that these services will continue to be provided at the current level.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 384, "no_votes": 129, "total_votes": 513, "percent_yes": 74.85380116959064, "percent_no": 25.14619883040936, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.691491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.045270", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "This measure is not a tax.  It is an advisory measure which states the Fowler City voters preference that any new voter-approved utility users tax be used only to fund the City of Fowler Fire and Police Departments to help ensure that these services will continue to be provided at the current level.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10236, "fingerprint": "1999|199900171|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900171|FRESNO", "content_hash": "53baddc9b32b9382", "measure_id": "199900171", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fowler be authorized to implement a utility user's tax of five percent (5%) upon residential users of electricity and gas, three percent (3%) upon commercial, industrial, and agricultural users of electricity and gas, and five percent (5%) of the base service rate upon all users of telephone service in the City of Fowler, with the tax terminating on January 1, 2003, as set forth in Ordinance 99-6?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 269, "no_votes": 242, "total_votes": 511, "percent_yes": 52.64187866927593, "percent_no": 47.35812133072407, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.691759", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.045493", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fowler be authorized to implement a utility user's tax of five percent (5%) upon residential users of electricity and gas, three percent (3%) upon commercial, industrial, and agricultural users of electricity and gas, and five percent (5%) of the base service rate upon all users of telephone service in the City of Fowler, with the tax terminating on January 1, 2003, as set forth in Ordinance 99-6?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10238, "fingerprint": "1999|199900127|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900127|GLENN", "content_hash": "675b911bbca81191", "measure_id": "199900127", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall W. Barry Duncan be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Willows Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1018, "no_votes": 812, "total_votes": 1830, "percent_yes": 55.62841530054645, "percent_no": 44.37158469945355, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-10-05", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.692298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.045899", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall W. Barry Duncan be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Willows Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10237, "fingerprint": "1999|199900114|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900114|GLENN", "content_hash": "d7f25d758f1aaaf1", "measure_id": "199900114", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and to construct and acquire classrooms and additional facilities for Plaza Elementary School, and to provide the local matching funds required to be eligible to receive funds for the State of California for its projects, shall the Plaza Elementary School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $750,000, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78, "no_votes": 17, "total_votes": 95, "percent_yes": 82.10526315789474, "percent_no": 17.89473684210526, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.692030", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.045699", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and to construct and acquire classrooms and additional facilities for Plaza Elementary School, and to provide the local matching funds required to be eligible to receive funds for the State of California for its projects, shall the Plaza Elementary School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $750,000, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10239, "fingerprint": "1999|199900062|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900062|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "4bdc45265aa8eb79", "measure_id": "199900062", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funding for acquisition, construction and modernization of facilities, including new classrooms to replace aging temporary classrooms, a new multipurpose building and gymnasium, a new multimedia library, and electrical wiring improvements, all to ensure a safe, healthy and productive school, shall the Pacific Union School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $2,500,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit, to be used for the above purpose?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 695, "no_votes": 174, "total_votes": 869, "percent_yes": 79.97698504027618, "percent_no": 20.023014959723824, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.692562", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.046086", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding for acquisition, construction and modernization of facilities, including new classrooms to replace aging temporary classrooms, a new multipurpose building and gymnasium, a new multimedia library, and electrical wiring improvements, all to ensure a safe, healthy and productive school, shall the Pacific Union School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $2,500,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit, to be used for the above purpose?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10240, "fingerprint": "1999|199900074|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900074|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "f5edacc68095f2af", "measure_id": "199900074", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Ferndale Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $1,100,000 with an interest rate within the legal limit, for the acquisition and construction of: 1) Twelve classrooms, a media center, a computer laboratory, a student lunch area, bathrooms, and teacher work rooms at the elementary and junior high school sites; 2) A classroom, two offices and a reception area at the high school site; and 3) Other needed school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 702, "no_votes": 188, "total_votes": 890, "percent_yes": 78.87640449438203, "percent_no": 21.12359550561797, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-05-18", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.692907", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.046270", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ferndale Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $1,100,000 with an interest rate within the legal limit, for the acquisition and construction of: 1) Twelve classrooms, a media center, a computer laboratory, a student lunch area, bathrooms, and teacher work rooms at the elementary and junior high school sites; 2) A classroom, two offices and a reception area at the high school site; and 3) Other needed school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10241, "fingerprint": "1999|199900111|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900111|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "ae8941c8d80ff2c7", "measure_id": "199900111", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the land use designation in the City's General Plan, Local Coastal Program and Zoning Map for Union Pacific's \"Balloon Track\" (East of Waterfront Drive, West of Broadway, and North of Washington Street) changing it from \"Public\" to \"Service Commercial\" thereby allowing commercial/retail use of the property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2683, "no_votes": 4091, "total_votes": 6774, "percent_yes": 39.60732211396516, "percent_no": 60.39267788603484, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-08-24", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.693178", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.046456", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the land use designation in the City's General Plan, Local Coastal Program and Zoning Map for Union Pacific's \"Balloon Track\" (East of Waterfront Drive, West of Broadway, and North of Washington Street) changing it from \"Public\" to \"Service Commercial\" thereby allowing commercial/retail use of the property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10242, "fingerprint": "1999|199900120|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900120|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "3b0a03219070e5cd", "measure_id": "199900120", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide for the acquisition, construction and modernization of facilities, including renovating of aging classrooms and buildings at Fortuna High School and replacement of classrooms at East High School; to replace electrical wiring, plumbing and heating systems, and technology infrastructure improvements all to ensure safe, healthy and productive schools, shall the Fortuna Union High School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $1,500,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit, to be used for the above purpose?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2704, "no_votes": 347, "total_votes": 3051, "percent_yes": 88.62667977712225, "percent_no": 11.373320222877751, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-21", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.693447", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.046645", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide for the acquisition, construction and modernization of facilities, including renovating of aging classrooms and buildings at Fortuna High School and replacement of classrooms at East High School; to replace electrical wiring, plumbing and heating systems, and technology infrastructure improvements all to ensure safe, healthy and productive schools, shall the Fortuna Union High School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $1,500,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit, to be used for the above purpose?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10243, "fingerprint": "1999|199900233|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900233|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "6350c174533abdf6", "measure_id": "199900233", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, modernize and construct school facilities and remove safety hazards, shall the Peninsula Union Elementary School District incur bonded indebtedness of $1,080,000 at interest rates within legal limits, for purposes including:  1. Modernizing schools for computer technology including a new library/media center; 2. Removing asbestos, repairing roofs and improving earthquake safety; 3. Improving playgrounds; 4. Upgrading security, fire, and safety systems including outdoor lighting and; 5. Building a meeting room for community school use.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59, "no_votes": 32, "total_votes": 91, "percent_yes": 64.83516483516483, "percent_no": 35.16483516483517, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.693782", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.046871", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, modernize and construct school facilities and remove safety hazards, shall the Peninsula Union Elementary School District incur bonded indebtedness of $1,080,000 at interest rates within legal limits, for purposes including:  1. Modernizing schools for computer technology including a new library/media center; 2. Removing asbestos, repairing roofs and improving earthquake safety; 3. Improving playgrounds; 4. Upgrading security, fire, and safety systems including outdoor lighting and; 5. Building a meeting room for community school use.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10244, "fingerprint": "1999|199900075|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900075|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "295ee120c37cd7a3", "measure_id": "199900075", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and improve health and safety conditions at the Seeley Union Elementary School, including replacing inadequate electrical and air-conditioning/heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs and plumbing, upgrading the technological capabilities of the school, and constructing, renovating and repairing school facilities to achieve the foregoing, shall the Seeley Union Elementary School District issue up to $900,000 of general obligation bonds, at an interest rate within the legal system?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29, "no_votes": 16, "total_votes": 45, "percent_yes": 64.44444444444444, "percent_no": 35.55555555555556, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-05-18", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.694052", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.047065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and improve health and safety conditions at the Seeley Union Elementary School, including replacing inadequate electrical and air-conditioning/heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs and plumbing, upgrading the technological capabilities of the school, and constructing, renovating and repairing school facilities to achieve the foregoing, shall the Seeley Union Elementary School District issue up to $900,000 of general obligation bonds, at an interest rate within the legal system?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10247, "fingerprint": "1999|199900172|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900172|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "a87444c17189be17", "measure_id": "199900172", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Brawley adopt a utility user's tax ordinance imposing 1 1/2 percent tax, upon the following utility services: defined telephone, electricity, gas, water, sewer, trash collection and cable television for funding fire protection, fire prevention, rescue and medical aid services for all areas of the city when the presence of trains precludes readily available from west to east or east to west?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1087, "no_votes": 1836, "total_votes": 2923, "percent_yes": 37.18782073212452, "percent_no": 62.81217926787548, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.694921", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.047619", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Brawley adopt a utility user's tax ordinance imposing 1 1/2 percent tax, upon the following utility services: defined telephone, electricity, gas, water, sewer, trash collection and cable television for funding fire protection, fire prevention, rescue and medical aid services for all areas of the city when the presence of trains precludes readily available from west to east or east to west?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10245, "fingerprint": "1999|199900129|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900129|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "3ee8ae67208c1f28", "measure_id": "199900129", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Imperial County Fair Pay for Public Safety Act of 1999, which requires Imperial County, every year in October, commencing in 1999, to conduct wage comparison surveys of 12 other public agencies and to pay certain Imperial County public safety employees not less than 95% of the comparable-position survey average, be adopted?  Any survey-based pay adjustments take effect the January following each survey, except the first adjustment, which is paid over 3 years.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5340, "no_votes": 7904, "total_votes": 13244, "percent_yes": 40.32014497130776, "percent_no": 59.67985502869224, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.694321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.047249", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Imperial County Fair Pay for Public Safety Act of 1999, which requires Imperial County, every year in October, commencing in 1999, to conduct wage comparison surveys of 12 other public agencies and to pay certain Imperial County public safety employees not less than 95% of the comparable-position survey average, be adopted?  Any survey-based pay adjustments take effect the January following each survey, except the first adjustment, which is paid over 3 years.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10246, "fingerprint": "1999|199900130|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900130|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "e213c01d8d9e0ee9", "measure_id": "199900130", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Imperial County Ordinance No. 1300, which imposes a transactions and use tax (i.e. sales tax) of 0.5 percent (0.5%), upon retail transactions within the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County of Imperial, be adopted?  The proceeds of the tax shall be used for general county governmental purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2231, "no_votes": 10748, "total_votes": 12979, "percent_yes": 17.18930580167963, "percent_no": 82.81069419832036, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.694650", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.047435", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Imperial County Ordinance No. 1300, which imposes a transactions and use tax (i.e. sales tax) of 0.5 percent (0.5%), upon retail transactions within the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County of Imperial, be adopted?  The proceeds of the tax shall be used for general county governmental purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10248, "fingerprint": "1999|199900234|INYO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900234|INYO", "content_hash": "caed080c492c6524", "measure_id": "199900234", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Inyo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to improve the education provided to students, to modernize classrooms, plumbing, ventilation, and electrical systems, to complete health and safety improvements, to make the District eligible to receive State-matching funds, and to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, shall the Round Valley Joint Elementary School District be authorized to issue $1.2 million of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed 12 (twelve) percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 271, "no_votes": 49, "total_votes": 320, "percent_yes": 84.6875, "percent_no": 15.3125, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.695192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.047802", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to improve the education provided to students, to modernize classrooms, plumbing, ventilation, and electrical systems, to complete health and safety improvements, to make the District eligible to receive State-matching funds, and to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, shall the Round Valley Joint Elementary School District be authorized to issue $1.2 million of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed 12 (twelve) percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Inyo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12152, "fingerprint": "1999|199900235|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900235|KERN", "content_hash": "e544b012e7cdc28f", "measure_id": "199900235", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the territory commonly known as the \"Mettler area\" be transferred from the jurisdiction of the El Tejon Unified School District and annexed to the General Shafter School District (for grades K-8) and the Kern High School District (for grades 9-12)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40, "no_votes": 3, "total_votes": 43, "percent_yes": 93.02325581395348, "percent_no": 6.976744186046517, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.302119", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.696004", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.048341", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the territory commonly known as the \"Mettler area\" be transferred from the jurisdiction of the El Tejon Unified School District and annexed to the General Shafter School District (for grades K-8) and the Kern High School District (for grades 9-12)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12151, "fingerprint": "1999|199900089|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900089|KERN", "content_hash": "8761354122ab9d3d", "measure_id": "199900089", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, build additional permanent classrooms, repair and upgrade schools throughout the district, provide students with access to [sic] and modern classroom technology, and make the district eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Lamont School District issue $4,200,000 of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by law to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 957, "no_votes": 150, "total_votes": 1107, "percent_yes": 86.44986449864498, "percent_no": 13.550135501355015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.301916", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.695731", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.048162", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, build additional permanent classrooms, repair and upgrade schools throughout the district, provide students with access to [sic] and modern classroom technology, and make the district eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Lamont School District issue $4,200,000 of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by law to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10249, "fingerprint": "1999|199900027|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900027|KERN", "content_hash": "020c13c0ea03852f", "measure_id": "199900027", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding by building a new high school and converting the current high school into a junior high, building permanent classrooms at Cummings Valley Elementary, and to repair and renovate schools including replacing deteriorating and unsafe electrical, heating and plumbing systems, comply with current State health, fire and safety standards, shall the Tehachapi Unified School District issue $24 million in bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit with no bond funds used for school administration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3104, "no_votes": 1334, "total_votes": 4438, "percent_yes": 69.94141505182515, "percent_no": 30.058584948174854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.695460", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.047982", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding by building a new high school and converting the current high school into a junior high, building permanent classrooms at Cummings Valley Elementary, and to repair and renovate schools including replacing deteriorating and unsafe electrical, heating and plumbing systems, comply with current State health, fire and safety standards, shall the Tehachapi Unified School District issue $24 million in bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit with no bond funds used for school administration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10250, "fingerprint": "1999|199900236|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900236|KERN", "content_hash": "15199248b280f77e", "measure_id": "199900236", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding, to improve health and safety conditions of local schools, and to provide resources for timely repair of school facilities, including repairing aging roofs, replacing inadequate electrical systems and classroom lighting, upgrading children's restrooms, and renovating plumbing, sewer, heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the southern Kern Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $13,300,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 887, "no_votes": 540, "total_votes": 1427, "percent_yes": 62.1583742116328, "percent_no": 37.8416257883672, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.696274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.048523", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding, to improve health and safety conditions of local schools, and to provide resources for timely repair of school facilities, including repairing aging roofs, replacing inadequate electrical systems and classroom lighting, upgrading children's restrooms, and renovating plumbing, sewer, heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the southern Kern Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $13,300,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10251, "fingerprint": "1999|199900237|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900237|KERN", "content_hash": "55d8467c25242b38", "measure_id": "199900237", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the purpose of construction of new classrooms and the repair and rehabilitation of schools and classrooms; shall Wasco Union School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $3.6 million, at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 843, "no_votes": 444, "total_votes": 1287, "percent_yes": 65.5011655011655, "percent_no": 34.4988344988345, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.696606", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.048714", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the purpose of construction of new classrooms and the repair and rehabilitation of schools and classrooms; shall Wasco Union School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $3.6 million, at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12153, "fingerprint": "1999|199900121|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900121|KINGS", "content_hash": "4e347bc1878d645d", "measure_id": "199900121", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Lemore Union School District, to accommodate overcrowding and class size reduction, build a new elementary school on Cinnamon Drive by issuing general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 at an interest rate not exceeding the maximum allowed by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1580, "no_votes": 904, "total_votes": 2484, "percent_yes": 63.60708534621578, "percent_no": 36.39291465378422, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-21", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.302939", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.697211", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.049088", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lemore Union School District, to accommodate overcrowding and class size reduction, build a new elementary school on Cinnamon Drive by issuing general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 at an interest rate not exceeding the maximum allowed by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10252, "fingerprint": "1999|199900052|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900052|KINGS", "content_hash": "9c5ac8365c7586d6", "measure_id": "199900052", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Lemore Union School District, to accommodate overcrowding and class size reduction, build a new elementary school on Cinnamon Drive and complete the master plan at Liberty Middle School (an additional classroom wing which includes science labs and a gymnasium which includes two classrooms) by issuing general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $5,500,000 at an interest rate not to exceeding the maximum allowed by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1243, "no_votes": 623, "total_votes": 1866, "percent_yes": 66.61307609860665, "percent_no": 33.386923901393345, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-23", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.696936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.048895", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lemore Union School District, to accommodate overcrowding and class size reduction, build a new elementary school on Cinnamon Drive and complete the master plan at Liberty Middle School (an additional classroom wing which includes science labs and a gymnasium which includes two classrooms) by issuing general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $5,500,000 at an interest rate not to exceeding the maximum allowed by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10253, "fingerprint": "1999|199900090|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900090|LAKE", "content_hash": "8e911ec21d4436dd", "measure_id": "199900090", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct permanent classrooms and a new multi-purpose room, renovate existing classrooms, science labs, computer labs, and libraries on the high school campus, shall the Upper Lake Union High School District issue $4,140,000 of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit to acquire, construct and improve school sites, classrooms and facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 860, "no_votes": 299, "total_votes": 1159, "percent_yes": 74.20189818809318, "percent_no": 25.798101811906818, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.697488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.049267", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct permanent classrooms and a new multi-purpose room, renovate existing classrooms, science labs, computer labs, and libraries on the high school campus, shall the Upper Lake Union High School District issue $4,140,000 of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit to acquire, construct and improve school sites, classrooms and facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10254, "fingerprint": "1999|199900028|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900028|LASSEN", "content_hash": "bc628b713c4a2de2", "measure_id": "199900028", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, provide students with access to classroom computer and science technology, build permanent classrooms, repair and upgrade schools throughout the district, make the district eligible to receive state matching funds, and to acquire, construct, and improve classroom and facilities, shall the Lassen Union High School District be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed $8.7 million at an interest rate below the limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1175, "no_votes": 1818, "total_votes": 2993, "percent_yes": 39.25826929502172, "percent_no": 60.74173070497828, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.697758", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.049449", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, provide students with access to classroom computer and science technology, build permanent classrooms, repair and upgrade schools throughout the district, make the district eligible to receive state matching funds, and to acquire, construct, and improve classroom and facilities, shall the Lassen Union High School District be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed $8.7 million at an interest rate below the limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10258, "fingerprint": "1999|199900053|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900053|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0aaeec12f8f2a508", "measure_id": "199900053", "measure_letter": "99-A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance reducing the salaries of the Mayor and City council be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4613, "no_votes": 1981, "total_votes": 6594, "percent_yes": 69.95753715498938, "percent_no": 30.04246284501062, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-06", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.699560", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.050548", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance reducing the salaries of the Mayor and City council be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10259, "fingerprint": "1999|199900054|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900054|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d57af257fcfb78f0", "measure_id": "199900054", "measure_letter": "99-B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the duties of general Auditor be transferred to the Office of City Treasurer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2197, "no_votes": 4085, "total_votes": 6282, "percent_yes": 34.97293855460044, "percent_no": 65.02706144539957, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-06", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.699838", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.050773", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the duties of general Auditor be transferred to the Office of City Treasurer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10260, "fingerprint": "1999|199900055|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900055|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b75ada628d97daf7", "measure_id": "199900055", "measure_letter": "99-C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to restore to the City the authority to maintain its own fire department and emergency medical and hazardous materials services, and to set forth the minimum documented cost savings and efficiencies which shall be required before any transfer of such services outside the City shall be considered?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2523, "no_votes": 4219, "total_votes": 6742, "percent_yes": 37.42212993177099, "percent_no": 62.57787006822901, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-06", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.700107", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.050962", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to restore to the City the authority to maintain its own fire department and emergency medical and hazardous materials services, and to set forth the minimum documented cost savings and efficiencies which shall be required before any transfer of such services outside the City shall be considered?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10261, "fingerprint": "1999|199900056|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900056|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "928af64892a7fad0", "measure_id": "199900056", "measure_letter": "99-D", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to provide that the salaries of the members of the City Council shall not exceed the average household income in Los Angeles County as determined by the 1990 US Census, and shall not be less than half the average household income in Los Angeles as determined by said Census?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3242, "no_votes": 3377, "total_votes": 6619, "percent_yes": 48.98020849070856, "percent_no": 51.01979150929144, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-06", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.700448", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.051146", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended to provide that the salaries of the members of the City Council shall not exceed the average household income in Los Angeles County as determined by the 1990 US Census, and shall not be less than half the average household income in Los Angeles as determined by said Census?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12162, "fingerprint": "1999|199900283|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900283|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "98b1851eb5745f0c", "measure_id": "199900283", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and renovate existing school facilities in La Canada Flintridge, build needed school facilities and modernize classrooms, all in accordance with the District's Facilities Master Plan, shall the La Canada Unified School District issue $6 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and qualify to receive a grant of $7.8 million of State bond funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2425, "no_votes": 587, "total_votes": 3012, "percent_yes": 80.51128818061089, "percent_no": 19.48871181938911, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-12-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.310191", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.704486", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.053604", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and renovate existing school facilities in La Canada Flintridge, build needed school facilities and modernize classrooms, all in accordance with the District's Facilities Master Plan, shall the La Canada Unified School District issue $6 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit and qualify to receive a grant of $7.8 million of State bond funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12161, "fingerprint": "1999|199900241|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900241|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f2183b9d389c36e9", "measure_id": "199900241", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding by constructing and acquiring additional schools, classrooms, and facilities and to rehabilitate aging junior high and high schools including replacing inadequate lighting, electrical, ventilation, plumbing systems and roofs, renovating classrooms, libraries, and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the William S. Hart Union High School District issue $52 million in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, and appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10243, "no_votes": 5466, "total_votes": 15709, "percent_yes": 65.20465974918837, "percent_no": 34.795340250811634, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.309985", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.704213", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.053424", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding by constructing and acquiring additional schools, classrooms, and facilities and to rehabilitate aging junior high and high schools including replacing inadequate lighting, electrical, ventilation, plumbing systems and roofs, renovating classrooms, libraries, and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the William S. Hart Union High School District issue $52 million in bonds at interest rates below legal limits, and appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12154, "fingerprint": "1999|199900029|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900029|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d1710d787d65e3db", "measure_id": "199900029", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and rehabilitate local schools, including health and safety repairs, upgrading inadequate electrical, heating, ventilation and plumbing systems, renovating children's restrooms, repairing deteriorating roofs, adding classrooms to existing schools, acquiring property, and building new schools to relieve severe overcrowding, shall the Lancaster School District issue bonds in an amount of $29 million at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5762, "no_votes": 1631, "total_votes": 7393, "percent_yes": 77.93859055863655, "percent_no": 22.061409441363452, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.304681", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.698878", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.050186", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and rehabilitate local schools, including health and safety repairs, upgrading inadequate electrical, heating, ventilation and plumbing systems, renovating children's restrooms, repairing deteriorating roofs, adding classrooms to existing schools, acquiring property, and building new schools to relieve severe overcrowding, shall the Lancaster School District issue bonds in an amount of $29 million at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10255, "fingerprint": "1999|199900012|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900012|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "84c36aa1e8b1ca54", "measure_id": "199900012", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City Attorney be appointed be the City Council instead of elected by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1359, "no_votes": 4490, "total_votes": 5849, "percent_yes": 23.23474098136433, "percent_no": 76.76525901863567, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.698061", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.049632", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City Attorney be appointed be the City Council instead of elected by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12158, "fingerprint": "1999|199900173|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900173|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "85eecf8f8e7dd849", "measure_id": "199900173", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to protect and preserve the existing areas of Open space in Agoura Hills by requiring two-thirds voter approval before any land designated as Open Space may be changed to some other designation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1710, "no_votes": 286, "total_votes": 1996, "percent_yes": 85.67134268537075, "percent_no": 14.328657314629254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.307794", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.701694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.051911", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to protect and preserve the existing areas of Open space in Agoura Hills by requiring two-thirds voter approval before any land designated as Open Space may be changed to some other designation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10256, "fingerprint": "1999|199900013|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900013|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "95ab31e44e0ae69c", "measure_id": "199900013", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City Clerk be appointed by the City Council instead of elected by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1085, "no_votes": 4722, "total_votes": 5807, "percent_yes": 18.68434647838815, "percent_no": 81.31565352161185, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.698333", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.049818", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City Clerk be appointed by the City Council instead of elected by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12159, "fingerprint": "1999|199900174|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900174|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "180459afd329af39", "measure_id": "199900174", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Arcadia incur a bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $8,000,000 for the construction and completion of the following municipal improvement, to wit: police station in the Arcadia Civic Center, including facilities for emergency operations, police dispatch and 911 emergency communications, detective bureau, records, police laboratory, jail facility, evidence storage and other works, property of structures for efficient, effective law enforcement necessary for said City Police Station?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3795, "no_votes": 1053, "total_votes": 4848, "percent_yes": 78.27970297029702, "percent_no": 21.720297029702976, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.308106", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.701993", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.052088", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Arcadia incur a bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $8,000,000 for the construction and completion of the following municipal improvement, to wit: police station in the Arcadia Civic Center, including facilities for emergency operations, police dispatch and 911 emergency communications, detective bureau, records, police laboratory, jail facility, evidence storage and other works, property of structures for efficient, effective law enforcement necessary for said City Police Station?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12157, "fingerprint": "1999|199900076|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900076|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d4ce0cb9d6c0841d", "measure_id": "199900076", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Snowline Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) at a rate not to exceed the statutory maximum to acquire and construct one elementary school facility to reduce overcrowding?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21, "no_votes": 12, "total_votes": 33, "percent_yes": 63.63636363636363, "percent_no": 36.36363636363637, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-05-18", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.306933", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.701009", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.051525", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Snowline Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) at a rate not to exceed the statutory maximum to acquire and construct one elementary school facility to reduce overcrowding?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12156, "fingerprint": "1999|199900057|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900057|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "715982017dcc4712", "measure_id": "199900057", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities for Compton children and to improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood schools, including replacing deteriorating roofs, electrical, heating, plumbing and security systems, complying with fire and safety standards, reducing earthquake danger and other hazards, shall the Compton Unified School District issue $107 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, repair, rehabilitate, construct and modernize classrooms and school facilities with all proceeds staying in Compton to benefit local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2163, "no_votes": 5257, "total_votes": 7420, "percent_yes": 29.15094339622641, "percent_no": 70.84905660377359, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-20", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.306457", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.700720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.051329", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities for Compton children and to improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood schools, including replacing deteriorating roofs, electrical, heating, plumbing and security systems, complying with fire and safety standards, reducing earthquake danger and other hazards, shall the Compton Unified School District issue $107 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, repair, rehabilitate, construct and modernize classrooms and school facilities with all proceeds staying in Compton to benefit local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12155, "fingerprint": "1999|199900030|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900030|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "89086697756a3ddd", "measure_id": "199900030", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To give students access to computers, eliminate safety hazards by repairing deteriorating facilities, and make major repairs including replacing outdated plumbing, upgrading fire alarms and rehabilitating 50 year old classrooms, shall the Whittier Union High School District issue $98 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for the repair and rehabilitation of schools, the construction of new classrooms and school facilities, and the wiring of classrooms for computers and modern technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7568, "no_votes": 3059, "total_votes": 10627, "percent_yes": 71.21483014961889, "percent_no": 28.78516985038111, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.304912", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.699155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.050365", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To give students access to computers, eliminate safety hazards by repairing deteriorating facilities, and make major repairs including replacing outdated plumbing, upgrading fire alarms and rehabilitating 50 year old classrooms, shall the Whittier Union High School District issue $98 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for the repair and rehabilitation of schools, the construction of new classrooms and school facilities, and the wiring of classrooms for computers and modern technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10257, "fingerprint": "1999|199900014|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900014|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "c42a4b89885c9007", "measure_id": "199900014", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City Treasurer be appointed by the City Council instead of elected by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 960, "no_votes": 4863, "total_votes": 5823, "percent_yes": 16.48634724368882, "percent_no": 83.51365275631119, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.698608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.050006", "update_count": 6, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City Treasurer be appointed by the City Council instead of elected by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10264, "fingerprint": "1999|199900176|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900176|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6c0615c5dfdcf9f1", "measure_id": "199900176", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted which would repeal the City's utility user tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1538, "no_votes": 2323, "total_votes": 3861, "percent_yes": 39.83423983423983, "percent_no": 60.16576016576017, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.702568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.052464", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted which would repeal the City's utility user tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10266, "fingerprint": "1999|199900238|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900238|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ecb97525fa1274f9", "measure_id": "199900238", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve serious overcrowding by adding classrooms, repairing and rehabilitating school facilities to meet current health, safety, and instructional standards including reducing dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades, replacing inadequate lighting, deteriorated plumbing, heating, air conditioning, ventilation and electrical systems, refurbishing classrooms, laboratories, and restrooms, to construct additional high schools under an independent oversight committee, shall Antelope Valley Union High School District issue $91 million in bonds, at the lowest interest rate possible, with all money raised benefiting local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14310, "no_votes": 8374, "total_votes": 22684, "percent_yes": 63.08411214953272, "percent_no": 36.91588785046728, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.703216", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.052870", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve serious overcrowding by adding classrooms, repairing and rehabilitating school facilities to meet current health, safety, and instructional standards including reducing dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades, replacing inadequate lighting, deteriorated plumbing, heating, air conditioning, ventilation and electrical systems, refurbishing classrooms, laboratories, and restrooms, to construct additional high schools under an independent oversight committee, shall Antelope Valley Union High School District issue $91 million in bonds, at the lowest interest rate possible, with all money raised benefiting local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10263, "fingerprint": "1999|199900175|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900175|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "439e19f5abb37e92", "measure_id": "199900175", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to impose a general purpose utility user tax at a rate not to exceed 5%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 334, "no_votes": 1088, "total_votes": 1422, "percent_yes": 23.488045007032348, "percent_no": 76.51195499296765, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.702276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.052280", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be adopted to impose a general purpose utility user tax at a rate not to exceed 5%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10265, "fingerprint": "1999|199900177|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900177|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2287e9ad6d725d06", "measure_id": "199900177", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should section 510 of the Torrance City Charter be amended to change the date of holding the general municipal election to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in May of each even numbered year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3755, "no_votes": 4234, "total_votes": 7989, "percent_yes": 47.00212792589811, "percent_no": 52.99787207410189, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.702923", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.052645", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should section 510 of the Torrance City Charter be amended to change the date of holding the general municipal election to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in May of each even numbered year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12160, "fingerprint": "1999|199900239|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900239|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dc198384ad28ce05", "measure_id": "199900239", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding, improve safety for children, repair and renovate local elementary school facilities, shall the El Monte City Elementary School District issue $40 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, to acquire, construct and improve school sites and facilities and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, including adding classrooms, repairing roofs, dry rot and termite damage, renovating restrooms, upgrading electrical, plumbing and sewer systems, and improving student drop-off and pick-up zones?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3139, "no_votes": 1046, "total_votes": 4185, "percent_yes": 75.00597371565114, "percent_no": 24.994026284348863, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.309574", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.703656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.053058", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding, improve safety for children, repair and renovate local elementary school facilities, shall the El Monte City Elementary School District issue $40 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, to acquire, construct and improve school sites and facilities and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, including adding classrooms, repairing roofs, dry rot and termite damage, renovating restrooms, upgrading electrical, plumbing and sewer systems, and improving student drop-off and pick-up zones?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10262, "fingerprint": "1999|199900091|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900091|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4ba599fcfc2131d0", "measure_id": "199900091", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve classroom overcrowding, to improve health and safety conditions of Newhall elementary schools, to acquire land, build additional permanent classrooms, replace aging roofs, upgrade inadequate heating, air conditioning, ventilation, electrical, and plumbing systems, comply with fire, safety, and seismic standards, renovate children's restrooms, repair deteriorating playground and sidewalk surfaces, shall the Newhall Elementary School District issue bonds in amount of $35.5 million at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3790, "no_votes": 1840, "total_votes": 5630, "percent_yes": 67.31793960923623, "percent_no": 32.682060390763766, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.701418", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.051721", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve classroom overcrowding, to improve health and safety conditions of Newhall elementary schools, to acquire land, build additional permanent classrooms, replace aging roofs, upgrade inadequate heating, air conditioning, ventilation, electrical, and plumbing systems, comply with fire, safety, and seismic standards, renovate children's restrooms, repair deteriorating playground and sidewalk surfaces, shall the Newhall Elementary School District issue bonds in amount of $35.5 million at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10267, "fingerprint": "1999|199900240|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900240|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a2bdb6c2b11581e6", "measure_id": "199900240", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Mt. San Antonio Community College District repair and rehabilitate its school facilities to meet current health, safety and instructional standards, provide seismic upgrades to reduce dangers from earthquakes, renovate classrooms and outdated science laboratories, provide business and computer technology classrooms and labs, renovating plumbing, heating and electrical systems and provide other educational facilities by issuing $98 million in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, with no proceeds used for College employees' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19175, "no_votes": 11233, "total_votes": 30408, "percent_yes": 63.05906340436728, "percent_no": 36.94093659563272, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.703943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.053241", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mt. San Antonio Community College District repair and rehabilitate its school facilities to meet current health, safety and instructional standards, provide seismic upgrades to reduce dangers from earthquakes, renovate classrooms and outdated science laboratories, provide business and computer technology classrooms and labs, renovating plumbing, heating and electrical systems and provide other educational facilities by issuing $98 million in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, with no proceeds used for College employees' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10268, "fingerprint": "1999|199900092|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900092|MADERA", "content_hash": "5b6840a32550834f", "measure_id": "199900092", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain control over local schools, repair and upgrade the Webster School, construct a new high school, modernize classrooms, construct school facilities and acquire school sites, shall the new Golden Valley Unified School District, serving the Ranchos, Rolling Hills and communities of southeastern Madera County, issue $30 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1210, "no_votes": 378, "total_votes": 1588, "percent_yes": 76.19647355163728, "percent_no": 23.803526448362717, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.704771", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.053835", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain control over local schools, repair and upgrade the Webster School, construct a new high school, modernize classrooms, construct school facilities and acquire school sites, shall the new Golden Valley Unified School District, serving the Ranchos, Rolling Hills and communities of southeastern Madera County, issue $30 million of bonds at legal interest rates, with annual audits, citizen oversight and no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10269, "fingerprint": "1999|199900125|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900125|MADERA", "content_hash": "5ab607d3fdf15b97", "measure_id": "199900125", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new high school, including classrooms, labs, support facilities, utilities, and site improvements, and the acquisition of land, and to qualify for State funds which would pay for a portion of the cost of the high school, shall the Minarets Joint Union High School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not exceeding $11,920,000 at interest rates not exceeding the legal limit, to acquire, improve, and construct high school facilities and grounds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1108, "no_votes": 419, "total_votes": 1527, "percent_yes": 72.56057629338572, "percent_no": 27.439423706614278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-28", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.705163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.054025", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new high school, including classrooms, labs, support facilities, utilities, and site improvements, and the acquisition of land, and to qualify for State funds which would pay for a portion of the cost of the high school, shall the Minarets Joint Union High School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not exceeding $11,920,000 at interest rates not exceeding the legal limit, to acquire, improve, and construct high school facilities and grounds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12165, "fingerprint": "1999|199900282|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900282|MARIN", "content_hash": "e96ca3b05a51f98f", "measure_id": "199900282", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance the quality of education through facility improvements; ensure safety; repair leaky roofs; improve earthquake safety; replace fire alarms; remove asbestos; renovate mathematics, science and technology classrooms; replace outdated heater, ventilation/plumbing systems; acquire school facilities; improve disabled access; and improve school sites/facilities, shall San Rafael High School District issue $13 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, and create an Oversight Committee to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7206, "no_votes": 2555, "total_votes": 9761, "percent_yes": 73.82440323737322, "percent_no": 26.175596762626782, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-12-07", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.315018", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.710996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.057012", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance the quality of education through facility improvements; ensure safety; repair leaky roofs; improve earthquake safety; replace fire alarms; remove asbestos; renovate mathematics, science and technology classrooms; replace outdated heater, ventilation/plumbing systems; acquire school facilities; improve disabled access; and improve school sites/facilities, shall San Rafael High School District issue $13 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, and create an Oversight Committee to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10273, "fingerprint": "1999|199900032|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900032|MARIN", "content_hash": "64431bbc03862869", "measure_id": "199900032", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to upgrade school facilities; qualify for state matching funds; replace leaky roofs; upgrade fire alarm systems; repair heating and cooling systems; add new classrooms; ensure disabled access to all school facilities; renovate school plumbing; and acquire and construct other improvements, school buildings and grounds, shall the Novato Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $40 million at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4728, "no_votes": 4243, "total_votes": 8971, "percent_yes": 52.70315460929662, "percent_no": 47.29684539070338, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.707425", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.054785", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to upgrade school facilities; qualify for state matching funds; replace leaky roofs; upgrade fire alarm systems; repair heating and cooling systems; add new classrooms; ensure disabled access to all school facilities; renovate school plumbing; and acquire and construct other improvements, school buildings and grounds, shall the Novato Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $40 million at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12163, "fingerprint": "1999|199900280|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900280|MARIN", "content_hash": "ad172164ea1320bb", "measure_id": "199900280", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance the quality of education through facility improvements; protect children's safety; repair roofs; replace outdated heating/ventilation/plumbing systems; comply with earthquake safety standards; acquire school facilities; upgrade classrooms/bathrooms; obtain eligibility for state funding for renovation of schools; and make other school facilities/site improvements, shall the Dixie Elementary School District issue $10 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2763, "no_votes": 886, "total_votes": 3649, "percent_yes": 75.71937517127981, "percent_no": 24.280624828720192, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-12-07", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.314336", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.710373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.056545", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance the quality of education through facility improvements; protect children's safety; repair roofs; replace outdated heating/ventilation/plumbing systems; comply with earthquake safety standards; acquire school facilities; upgrade classrooms/bathrooms; obtain eligibility for state funding for renovation of schools; and make other school facilities/site improvements, shall the Dixie Elementary School District issue $10 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10272, "fingerprint": "1999|199900031|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900031|MARIN", "content_hash": "7edcaa9f090166a3", "measure_id": "199900031", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain small class sizes, improve students learning in core academic subjects, and continue to provide instructional materials and equipment for a growing student population, shall the Larkspur School District extend its special assessment at the new rate of $195 per year, for a period of six years, beginning on July 1, 1999, allowing for a cost-of-living and student population growth adjustment of 5% each year, with specific exemptions for property owners age 65 or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2359, "no_votes": 493, "total_votes": 2852, "percent_yes": 82.71388499298737, "percent_no": 17.286115007012626, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.706634", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.054564", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain small class sizes, improve students learning in core academic subjects, and continue to provide instructional materials and equipment for a growing student population, shall the Larkspur School District extend its special assessment at the new rate of $195 per year, for a period of six years, beginning on July 1, 1999, allowing for a cost-of-living and student population growth adjustment of 5% each year, with specific exemptions for property owners age 65 or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12164, "fingerprint": "1999|199900281|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900281|MARIN", "content_hash": "29f79a0cd129b9a8", "measure_id": "199900281", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enhance the quality of education through facility improvements; ensure safety; repair leaky roofs; remove asbestos; replace outdated heating, ventilation/plumbing systems; improve earthquake safety; renovate/re-open an elementary school; upgrade mathematics, science and reading classrooms; acquire school facilities; and upgrade school sites/facilities, shall San Rafael Elementary School District issue $26 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, and create an Oversight Committee to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4435, "no_votes": 1681, "total_votes": 6116, "percent_yes": 72.51471550032701, "percent_no": 27.485284499672986, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-12-07", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.314634", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.710656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.056751", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enhance the quality of education through facility improvements; ensure safety; repair leaky roofs; remove asbestos; replace outdated heating, ventilation/plumbing systems; improve earthquake safety; renovate/re-open an elementary school; upgrade mathematics, science and reading classrooms; acquire school facilities; and upgrade school sites/facilities, shall San Rafael Elementary School District issue $26 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, and create an Oversight Committee to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10274, "fingerprint": "1999|199900033|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900033|MARIN", "content_hash": "6dc7b4387a851b11", "measure_id": "199900033", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain science, technology, library, fine arts, Spanish, learning lab and small class size programs, shall the Ross School District extend its special assessment at the new rate of $495 per year with an annual 3% cost-of-living adjustment for a period of eight years, beginning July 1, 1999, which in tax year 1999-2000 would replace the existing parcel tax of $450, with specific exemptions for property owners age 65 or older?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 789, "no_votes": 139, "total_votes": 928, "percent_yes": 85.02155172413794, "percent_no": 14.978448275862064, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.707923", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.054979", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain science, technology, library, fine arts, Spanish, learning lab and small class size programs, shall the Ross School District extend its special assessment at the new rate of $495 per year with an annual 3% cost-of-living adjustment for a period of eight years, beginning July 1, 1999, which in tax year 1999-2000 would replace the existing parcel tax of $450, with specific exemptions for property owners age 65 or older?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10275, "fingerprint": "1999|199900034|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900034|MARIN", "content_hash": "05ae0f257d8ac06a", "measure_id": "199900034", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Ross Valley School District issue bonds for additional classrooms for class size reduction and program improvements; to upgrade and expand school libraries and computer learning centers; to modernize existing classrooms to support the educational programs at Brookside, Manor, Wade Thomas and White Hill schools; and to make necessary repairs and permanent improvements identified in its facilities master plan in an amount not to exceed $19,800,000.00 at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3132, "no_votes": 1423, "total_votes": 4555, "percent_yes": 68.7596048298573, "percent_no": 31.240395170142705, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.708217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.055159", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ross Valley School District issue bonds for additional classrooms for class size reduction and program improvements; to upgrade and expand school libraries and computer learning centers; to modernize existing classrooms to support the educational programs at Brookside, Manor, Wade Thomas and White Hill schools; and to make necessary repairs and permanent improvements identified in its facilities master plan in an amount not to exceed $19,800,000.00 at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10270, "fingerprint": "1999|199900009|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900009|MARIN", "content_hash": "3d23a747ae3fa9bb", "measure_id": "199900009", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 13 be amended increasing the special tax for paramedic services effective July 1, 1999 in an amount not to exceed $53.00 per year for each living unit, and a maximum of seven cents per square foot with a flat tax limit of $500.00 per one cent levied for each non-residential structure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 653, "no_votes": 115, "total_votes": 768, "percent_yes": 85.02604166666666, "percent_no": 14.973958333333343, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.705748", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.054208", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 13 be amended increasing the special tax for paramedic services effective July 1, 1999 in an amount not to exceed $53.00 per year for each living unit, and a maximum of seven cents per square foot with a flat tax limit of $500.00 per one cent levied for each non-residential structure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10271, "fingerprint": "1999|199900010|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900010|MARIN", "content_hash": "cb8d7d77fb8a9aa7", "measure_id": "199900010", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit for Marinwood Community Services District be increased in the amount of the special tax for fiscal years beginning July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2003?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 633, "no_votes": 132, "total_votes": 765, "percent_yes": 82.74509803921568, "percent_no": 17.254901960784323, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.706199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.054387", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit for Marinwood Community Services District be increased in the amount of the special tax for fiscal years beginning July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2003?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10281, "fingerprint": "1999|199900242|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900242|MARIN", "content_hash": "f9c1dc567515d0af", "measure_id": "199900242", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Nicasio School District be authorized to provide financing for acquisition of and improvements to school buildings and grounds, including renovation of aging school buildings, replacement of portable classrooms which do not meet current safety standards, modernization of antiquated mechanical and electrical systems, and build a multipurpose facility to invest in the future of our community's children, by issuing bonds in the amount of $2.5 million at an interest rate not exceeding the legal maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 132, "no_votes": 39, "total_votes": 171, "percent_yes": 77.19298245614034, "percent_no": 22.807017543859658, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.710100", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.056361", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Nicasio School District be authorized to provide financing for acquisition of and improvements to school buildings and grounds, including renovation of aging school buildings, replacement of portable classrooms which do not meet current safety standards, modernization of antiquated mechanical and electrical systems, and build a multipurpose facility to invest in the future of our community's children, by issuing bonds in the amount of $2.5 million at an interest rate not exceeding the legal maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10278, "fingerprint": "1999|199900178|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900178|MARIN", "content_hash": "d7be5f2b8b725ac8", "measure_id": "199900178", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of the Town of Corte Madera adopt the Corte Madera Recreation center Renovation and Expansion Act, with a special tax of fifty-nine dollars ($59.00) per year for each residential unit and fifty-nine dollars ($59.00) per 1000 square feet of floor area per year for each non residential use located within the corporate limits of the Town of Corte Madera for each of the fiscal years 2000-2001 to 2029-2030, for the sole purpose of funding and/or financing the renovation and expansion of the Corte Madera Recreation Center, including additional parking and landscape improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1797, "no_votes": 1099, "total_votes": 2896, "percent_yes": 62.05110497237569, "percent_no": 37.94889502762431, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.709217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.055806", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of the Town of Corte Madera adopt the Corte Madera Recreation center Renovation and Expansion Act, with a special tax of fifty-nine dollars ($59.00) per year for each residential unit and fifty-nine dollars ($59.00) per 1000 square feet of floor area per year for each non residential use located within the corporate limits of the Town of Corte Madera for each of the fiscal years 2000-2001 to 2029-2030, for the sole purpose of funding and/or financing the renovation and expansion of the Corte Madera Recreation Center, including additional parking and landscape improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10279, "fingerprint": "1999|199900179|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900179|MARIN", "content_hash": "61ec01a276cf73da", "measure_id": "199900179", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Farifax in order to maintain safe neighborhoods, streets and community facilities; repair and resurface neighborhood streets and major corridors; replace 60 year old storm drains; repair leaky roofs and make seismic upgrades to community facilities; and make sidewalks more accessible to the disabled, issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $6.83 million, at interest rates within the legal limit, and create a Citizen's Oversight Committee to conduct annual audits of expenditures?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1541, "no_votes": 723, "total_votes": 2264, "percent_yes": 68.06537102473497, "percent_no": 31.934628975265028, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.709488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.055988", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Farifax in order to maintain safe neighborhoods, streets and community facilities; repair and resurface neighborhood streets and major corridors; replace 60 year old storm drains; repair leaky roofs and make seismic upgrades to community facilities; and make sidewalks more accessible to the disabled, issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $6.83 million, at interest rates within the legal limit, and create a Citizen's Oversight Committee to conduct annual audits of expenditures?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10276, "fingerprint": "1999|199900131|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900131|MARIN", "content_hash": "e3eb80ab0d601cbb", "measure_id": "199900131", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the increase in appropriations limit equal to the proceeds of the special tax authorized by the voters on June 4, 1985 continue in effect for fiscal years 2000-2001 through and including 2003-2004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 417, "no_votes": 20, "total_votes": 437, "percent_yes": 95.4233409610984, "percent_no": 4.576659038901596, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.708564", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.055433", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the increase in appropriations limit equal to the proceeds of the special tax authorized by the voters on June 4, 1985 continue in effect for fiscal years 2000-2001 through and including 2003-2004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10277, "fingerprint": "1999|199900132|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900132|MARIN", "content_hash": "ceee5ed523da0596", "measure_id": "199900132", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the increase in appropriations limit equal to the proceeds of the special tax authorized by the voters on November 1995 continue in effect for fiscal years 2000-2001 through and including 2003-2004?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1886, "no_votes": 425, "total_votes": 2311, "percent_yes": 81.60969277369105, "percent_no": 18.39030722630895, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.708942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.055620", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the increase in appropriations limit equal to the proceeds of the special tax authorized by the voters on November 1995 continue in effect for fiscal years 2000-2001 through and including 2003-2004?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10280, "fingerprint": "1999|199900180|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900180|MARIN", "content_hash": "f7040c935f07c9ee", "measure_id": "199900180", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall San Rafael Municipal Code Chapter 3.28, by which the voters approved a special tax to provide paramedic service in the City, be amended to permit, in phased increases, up to $13.00 additional tax on residential units, and up to $.02 per square foot additional tax on non-residential structures, through 2003, to fully fund paramedic service costs, and shall San Rafael's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7516, "no_votes": 1474, "total_votes": 8990, "percent_yes": 83.60400444938821, "percent_no": 16.395995550611786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.709761", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.056171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall San Rafael Municipal Code Chapter 3.28, by which the voters approved a special tax to provide paramedic service in the City, be amended to permit, in phased increases, up to $13.00 additional tax on residential units, and up to $.02 per square foot additional tax on non-residential structures, through 2003, to fully fund paramedic service costs, and shall San Rafael's appropriation limit be correspondingly increased?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10282, "fingerprint": "1999|199900035|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900035|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "be4ff5ee102d41df", "measure_id": "199900035", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair local existing schools, upgrade deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and electrical systems; renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms to comply with current fire and safety standards, with no money for salaries, shall the Willits Unified School District issue $2.5 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1401, "no_votes": 547, "total_votes": 1948, "percent_yes": 71.91991786447639, "percent_no": 28.08008213552361, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.711268", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.057271", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair local existing schools, upgrade deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and electrical systems; renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms to comply with current fire and safety standards, with no money for salaries, shall the Willits Unified School District issue $2.5 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10283, "fingerprint": "1999|199900122|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900122|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "1242ea30b280471b", "measure_id": "199900122", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide funding for the completion of the original school buildings, including a multi-purpose room, and classrooms; safety improvements to school facilities; and permanent improvements to school grounds; shall the Manchester Union Elementary School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $1,000,000, at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 57, "no_votes": 60, "total_votes": 117, "percent_yes": 48.71794871794871, "percent_no": 51.28205128205129, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-21", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.711571", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.057522", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide funding for the completion of the original school buildings, including a multi-purpose room, and classrooms; safety improvements to school facilities; and permanent improvements to school grounds; shall the Manchester Union Elementary School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $1,000,000, at an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10284, "fingerprint": "1999|199900133|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900133|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "9dfb0bddce946406", "measure_id": "199900133", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 110 of the Brooktrails Township Community Services District increasing the Special Tax for Fire Protection and Prevention, including ambulance service, commencing within the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2000, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 376, "no_votes": 336, "total_votes": 712, "percent_yes": 52.80898876404494, "percent_no": 47.19101123595506, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.711850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.057758", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 110 of the Brooktrails Township Community Services District increasing the Special Tax for Fire Protection and Prevention, including ambulance service, commencing within the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2000, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10286, "fingerprint": "1999|199900093|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900093|MERCED", "content_hash": "9409ea3e1a7919ff", "measure_id": "199900093", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce crowding at high schools, construct a new high school, construct new classrooms at existing schools to reduce class size, renovate schools, create safer schools, renovate computer labs, science labs, and libraries, replace deteriorating roofs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire and construct other essential instructional school facilities, and to qualify for state bond funds, shall the Merced Union High School District issue bonds in a maximum amount of $24,633,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5759, "no_votes": 2429, "total_votes": 8188, "percent_yes": 70.33463605276013, "percent_no": 29.665363947239868, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.712436", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.058120", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce crowding at high schools, construct a new high school, construct new classrooms at existing schools to reduce class size, renovate schools, create safer schools, renovate computer labs, science labs, and libraries, replace deteriorating roofs, upgrade electrical systems, acquire and construct other essential instructional school facilities, and to qualify for state bond funds, shall the Merced Union High School District issue bonds in a maximum amount of $24,633,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10285, "fingerprint": "1999|199900036|MERCED|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900036|MERCED", "content_hash": "420ee1e3a55b64e3", "measure_id": "199900036", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Merced", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Merced River Union Elementary School District complete the construction of the multipurpose room at Washington School for student use and continued use as a community center and construct, acquire and repair schools and school sites by issuing $700,000 of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86, "no_votes": 9, "total_votes": 95, "percent_yes": 90.52631578947368, "percent_no": 9.473684210526315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.712125", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.057939", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Merced River Union Elementary School District complete the construction of the multipurpose room at Washington School for student use and continued use as a community center and construct, acquire and repair schools and school sites by issuing $700,000 of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Merced_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Merced County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.merced.ca.us/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10287, "fingerprint": "1999|199900004|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900004|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "a0b7e4b32058cec2", "measure_id": "199900004", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall ROY MENDOZA be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member, Trustee Area No. 3?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33, "no_votes": 18, "total_votes": 51, "percent_yes": 64.70588235294117, "percent_no": 35.294117647058826, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-01-12", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.712707", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.058303", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ROY MENDOZA be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member, Trustee Area No. 3?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12167, "fingerprint": "1999|199900244|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900244|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "6a35888c4c1b84cf", "measure_id": "199900244", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize schools throughout the District including, but not limited to, replacing broken plumbing, repairing heating/electrical systems, rewiring classrooms to increase access to technology, repairing leaky roofs and upgrading science labs and to make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall Pacific Grove Unified School District issue $12 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit, so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3826, "no_votes": 1100, "total_votes": 4926, "percent_yes": 77.66950872919203, "percent_no": 22.33049127080797, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.318921", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.714033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.059045", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize schools throughout the District including, but not limited to, replacing broken plumbing, repairing heating/electrical systems, rewiring classrooms to increase access to technology, repairing leaky roofs and upgrading science labs and to make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall Pacific Grove Unified School District issue $12 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit, so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10289, "fingerprint": "1999|199900037|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900037|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "11ffa3776bd40c63", "measure_id": "199900037", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, repair and upgrade classrooms throughout the District, build permanent classrooms, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Greenfield Union School District issue Seven Million Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($7,300,000.00) of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by law to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 771, "no_votes": 282, "total_votes": 1053, "percent_yes": 73.21937321937322, "percent_no": 26.780626780626775, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.713430", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.058662", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, repair and upgrade classrooms throughout the District, build permanent classrooms, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Greenfield Union School District issue Seven Million Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($7,300,000.00) of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by law to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12166, "fingerprint": "1999|199900243|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900243|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "fcb85c9fe96bb9f1", "measure_id": "199900243", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding by adding classrooms and schools, improve health and safety conditions of local elementary schools, including repairing aging roofs, replacing inadequate electrical systems and classroom lighting, upgrading children's restrooms, and renovating plumbing, sewer, heating, and ventilation systems, shall the Alisal Elementary School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $25 million at the lowest interest rates possible, to acquire and improve student support facilities, with all proceeds benefiting local children.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1755, "no_votes": 616, "total_votes": 2371, "percent_yes": 74.01940109658372, "percent_no": 25.98059890341628, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.318570", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.713750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.058851", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding by adding classrooms and schools, improve health and safety conditions of local elementary schools, including repairing aging roofs, replacing inadequate electrical systems and classroom lighting, upgrading children's restrooms, and renovating plumbing, sewer, heating, and ventilation systems, shall the Alisal Elementary School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $25 million at the lowest interest rates possible, to acquire and improve student support facilities, with all proceeds benefiting local children.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10288, "fingerprint": "1999|199900015|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900015|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d3f0998366b19289", "measure_id": "199900015", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 249 providing for adoption of a special Public Safety Tax for no more than three fiscal years to fund police and fire protection services within the City, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 517, "no_votes": 117, "total_votes": 634, "percent_yes": 81.54574132492114, "percent_no": 18.45425867507886, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.713076", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.058483", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 249 providing for adoption of a special Public Safety Tax for no more than three fiscal years to fund police and fire protection services within the City, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10290, "fingerprint": "1999|199900245|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900245|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "0c8723a824a509c6", "measure_id": "199900245", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable the San Miguel Joint Union Elementary School District to finance the costs of acquiring and constructing a new elementary school in the Heritage Ranch area, a gymnasium at Larsen Elementary School, and other school Improvements, including to obtain release of a $1, 646,431 State grant committed to the new school, and $764,754 of State grants for Larsen Elementary School, shall the District issue $3,850,000 of bonds bearing interest at lawful rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5, "no_votes": 8, "total_votes": 13, "percent_yes": 38.46153846153847, "percent_no": 61.53846153846153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.714307", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.059231", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable the San Miguel Joint Union Elementary School District to finance the costs of acquiring and constructing a new elementary school in the Heritage Ranch area, a gymnasium at Larsen Elementary School, and other school Improvements, including to obtain release of a $1, 646,431 State grant committed to the new school, and $764,754 of State grants for Larsen Elementary School, shall the District issue $3,850,000 of bonds bearing interest at lawful rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10293, "fingerprint": "1999|199900018|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900018|NAPA", "content_hash": "22aeb71939af22eb", "measure_id": "199900018", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For increasing the Town's Appropriation Limit by $900,000 for the maximum allowable period of 4 years beginning in fiscal year 1999/2000 and ending in fiscal year 2002/2003.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 554, "no_votes": 100, "total_votes": 654, "percent_yes": 84.70948012232415, "percent_no": 15.290519877675848, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.715113", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.059812", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For increasing the Town's Appropriation Limit by $900,000 for the maximum allowable period of 4 years beginning in fiscal year 1999/2000 and ending in fiscal year 2002/2003.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12168, "fingerprint": "1999|199900182|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900182|NAPA", "content_hash": "2bf3b999829d1bab", "measure_id": "199900182", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For recognizing a rural urban limit line and authorizing limited exceptions by popular vote or four-fifths (4/5) city council vote; defining the provision of city water service outside the incorporated areas of the city.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7226, "no_votes": 2132, "total_votes": 9358, "percent_yes": 77.21735413549904, "percent_no": 22.782645864500964, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.321445", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.716070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.060369", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For recognizing a rural urban limit line and authorizing limited exceptions by popular vote or four-fifths (4/5) city council vote; defining the provision of city water service outside the incorporated areas of the city.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10291, "fingerprint": "1999|199900016|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900016|NAPA", "content_hash": "df92b2519c2d4d99", "measure_id": "199900016", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the mayor's term be extended from two to four years, commencing with the next general election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 518, "no_votes": 793, "total_votes": 1311, "percent_yes": 39.51182303585049, "percent_no": 60.48817696414951, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.714572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.059416", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the mayor's term be extended from two to four years, commencing with the next general election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12169, "fingerprint": "1999|199900183|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900183|NAPA", "content_hash": "eb59378d57f33275", "measure_id": "199900183", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For increasing the number of eligible persons on the certified list for appointment to city employment from three to six persons.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7691, "no_votes": 1575, "total_votes": 9266, "percent_yes": 83.00237427153033, "percent_no": 16.99762572846967, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.321760", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.716345", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.060549", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For increasing the number of eligible persons on the certified list for appointment to city employment from three to six persons.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10292, "fingerprint": "1999|199900017|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900017|NAPA", "content_hash": "106cac2efac96b28", "measure_id": "199900017", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For an ordinance increasing the business license taxes on businesses engaged in the transportation of passengers for hire.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 868, "no_votes": 335, "total_votes": 1203, "percent_yes": 72.15295095594347, "percent_no": 27.847049044056533, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.714838", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.059594", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For an ordinance increasing the business license taxes on businesses engaged in the transportation of passengers for hire.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10295, "fingerprint": "1999|199900181|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900181|NAPA", "content_hash": "d69a97c00c657c08", "measure_id": "199900181", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "For the creation of the American Canyon Town Center and to amend the general plan and zoning designation of the area.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1486, "no_votes": 305, "total_votes": 1791, "percent_yes": 82.97040759352318, "percent_no": 17.029592406476823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.715807", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.060188", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the creation of the American Canyon Town Center and to amend the general plan and zoning designation of the area.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10294, "fingerprint": "1999|199900078|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900078|NAPA", "content_hash": "c2aa64af5fa4f19b", "measure_id": "199900078", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should Napa County Ordinance 1149 be approved which will establish and impose a special tax on certain real property in the unincorporated areas of Napa County, the proceeds of which shall only be used to continue providing fire engines and related types of fire equipment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2530, "no_votes": 1808, "total_votes": 4338, "percent_yes": 58.32180728446289, "percent_no": 41.67819271553711, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.715537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.060007", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Napa County Ordinance 1149 be approved which will establish and impose a special tax on certain real property in the unincorporated areas of Napa County, the proceeds of which shall only be used to continue providing fire engines and related types of fire equipment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10296, "fingerprint": "1999|199900038|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900038|NEVADA", "content_hash": "32869b4bb213a8c4", "measure_id": "199900038", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, construct, renovate, repair and improve safety conditions of local Truckee area schools, shall the School Facility Improvement District No. 1 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, with citizen's oversight committee and annual audits, acquire school sites, build middle school, upgrade school facilities and sites, add classrooms, security systems, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate computers, and replace worn roofs by issuing $35 million of bonds, at rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1574, "no_votes": 730, "total_votes": 2304, "percent_yes": 68.31597222222221, "percent_no": 31.684027777777786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.716611", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.060731", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, construct, renovate, repair and improve safety conditions of local Truckee area schools, shall the School Facility Improvement District No. 1 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, with citizen's oversight committee and annual audits, acquire school sites, build middle school, upgrade school facilities and sites, add classrooms, security systems, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate computers, and replace worn roofs by issuing $35 million of bonds, at rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12175, "fingerprint": "1999|199900279|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900279|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9a8ad2a0c9fd2d3f", "measure_id": "199900279", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair HIGH SCHOOLS in FOUNTAIN VALLEY, HUNTINGTON BEACH, WESTMINSTER, improve classroom, and safety/instruction, and build new classrooms, including: repairing sinking buildings, cracked foundations; repairing deteriorating roofs drainage, heating, plumbing, electrical systems; earthquake retrofitting; improving campus security; upgrading fire security; renovating science laboratories, libraries; wiring for computer technology; shall Huntington Beach Union High School District issue $123 million in bonds at legal rates, ONLY spent on school building/grounds NOT on administrators' salaries, conduct annual audits and establish Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18382, "no_votes": 11477, "total_votes": 29859, "percent_yes": 61.56267791955524, "percent_no": 38.43732208044476, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-09", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.325637", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.719778", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.062741", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair HIGH SCHOOLS in FOUNTAIN VALLEY, HUNTINGTON BEACH, WESTMINSTER, improve classroom, and safety/instruction, and build new classrooms, including: repairing sinking buildings, cracked foundations; repairing deteriorating roofs drainage, heating, plumbing, electrical systems; earthquake retrofitting; improving campus security; upgrading fire security; renovating science laboratories, libraries; wiring for computer technology; shall Huntington Beach Union High School District issue $123 million in bonds at legal rates, ONLY spent on school building/grounds NOT on administrators' salaries, conduct annual audits and establish Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12172, "fingerprint": "1999|199900246|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900246|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6fb2f741c2ff2daa", "measure_id": "199900246", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, improve student safety, and repair neighborhood schools by: repairing schools/sites/classrooms; acquiring sites/building school facilities; earthquake retrofitting; asbestos removal; renovating science laboratories, libraries; wiring for technology; qualifying for state matching funds; repairing leaking roofs, plumbing/electrical systems; upgrading school safety/fire security; shall Capistrano Unified School District issue $65,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with money only for school buildings/grounds and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20013, "no_votes": 7268, "total_votes": 27281, "percent_yes": 73.35874784648657, "percent_no": 26.641252153513435, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.324623", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.718955", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.062190", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, improve student safety, and repair neighborhood schools by: repairing schools/sites/classrooms; acquiring sites/building school facilities; earthquake retrofitting; asbestos removal; renovating science laboratories, libraries; wiring for technology; qualifying for state matching funds; repairing leaking roofs, plumbing/electrical systems; upgrading school safety/fire security; shall Capistrano Unified School District issue $65,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, with money only for school buildings/grounds and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12170, "fingerprint": "1999|199900060|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900060|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2b5c8feb518231ce", "measure_id": "199900060", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 98.075 providing for the adoption of Chapters 10 and 14 of the Treasure Island Destination Resort Community Local Coastal Program as components of the Treasure Island Specific Plan and revising the City's Land Use Element to incorporate new land use designations and amend the Land Use Map regarding the Treasure Island Specific Plan be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4628, "no_votes": 3761, "total_votes": 8389, "percent_yes": 55.16748122541423, "percent_no": 44.83251877458577, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.323389", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.717861", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.061464", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 98.075 providing for the adoption of Chapters 10 and 14 of the Treasure Island Destination Resort Community Local Coastal Program as components of the Treasure Island Specific Plan and revising the City's Land Use Element to incorporate new land use designations and amend the Land Use Map regarding the Treasure Island Specific Plan be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10297, "fingerprint": "1999|199900019|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900019|ORANGE", "content_hash": "78ea81fc373834eb", "measure_id": "199900019", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on September 15, 1998 by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as the incorporation of Leisure World subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order, including the establishment of an appropriations limit for the new city of the Leisure World area of $3,581,586.00 and the continuance as city taxes of the sales and use tax, transient occupancy, the real property transfer tax, and other general taxes presently imposed by the county at the same rate as imposed by the county and using the same manner of collection, be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5394, "no_votes": 5052, "total_votes": 10446, "percent_yes": 51.63699023549684, "percent_no": 48.36300976450316, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.716936", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.060912", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on September 15, 1998 by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as the incorporation of Leisure World subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order, including the establishment of an appropriations limit for the new city of the Leisure World area of $3,581,586.00 and the continuance as city taxes of the sales and use tax, transient occupancy, the real property transfer tax, and other general taxes presently imposed by the county at the same rate as imposed by the county and using the same manner of collection, be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12173, "fingerprint": "1999|199900247|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900247|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1c5b85a663880e72", "measure_id": "199900247", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Irvine Unified School District be authorized to enact a special levy of $95 per assessor's parcel, to be used exclusively for student safety, science, technology, class size reduction and neighborhood schools programs which are not fully funded by state K-12 budget allocations, and shall the District's appropriations limit be adjusted for four years from the effective date of the levy, subject to four year extensions thereafter by voter approval, in an amount equal to the revenue raised by the levy, and shall an annual public audit be conducted to examine the uses of these earmarked funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11287, "no_votes": 6667, "total_votes": 17954, "percent_yes": 62.86621365712376, "percent_no": 37.13378634287624, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.324960", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.719232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.062374", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Irvine Unified School District be authorized to enact a special levy of $95 per assessor's parcel, to be used exclusively for student safety, science, technology, class size reduction and neighborhood schools programs which are not fully funded by state K-12 budget allocations, and shall the District's appropriations limit be adjusted for four years from the effective date of the levy, subject to four year extensions thereafter by voter approval, in an amount equal to the revenue raised by the levy, and shall an annual public audit be conducted to examine the uses of these earmarked funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12171, "fingerprint": "1999|199900061|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900061|ORANGE", "content_hash": "cd6a8d9aff0c8891", "measure_id": "199900061", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1349 adding Chapter 25.27 (Treasure Island Specific Plan) to the Laguna Beach Municipal Code and approving Chapters 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13 of the Treasure Island Destination Resort Community Local Coastal Program as components of the Treasure Island Specific Plan be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4547, "no_votes": 3806, "total_votes": 8353, "percent_yes": 54.43553214413983, "percent_no": 45.56446785586017, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.323630", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.718128", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.061644", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1349 adding Chapter 25.27 (Treasure Island Specific Plan) to the Laguna Beach Municipal Code and approving Chapters 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13 of the Treasure Island Destination Resort Community Local Coastal Program as components of the Treasure Island Specific Plan be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10298, "fingerprint": "1999|199900020|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900020|ORANGE", "content_hash": "903ace71f635bdfa", "measure_id": "199900020", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the order of incorporation be confirmed, shall the members of the city council in future elections be elected by district or at large?  (Yes=District; No=At Large)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3557, "no_votes": 4804, "total_votes": 8361, "percent_yes": 42.54275804329626, "percent_no": 57.45724195670374, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.717326", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.061098", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the order of incorporation be confirmed, shall the members of the city council in future elections be elected by district or at large?  (Yes=District; No=At Large)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12174, "fingerprint": "1999|199900248|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900248|ORANGE", "content_hash": "fcba714cb17991bc", "measure_id": "199900248", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve severe overcrowding, improve safety for children, repair and renovate school facilities, and obtain eligibility for State funding for construction and renovation, including replacing portables with permanent classrooms, shall the Santa Ana Unified School District be authorized to issue $145,150,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, construct, and improve school sites and facilities, an establish a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee funds are spent only for the specified purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8207, "no_votes": 3406, "total_votes": 11613, "percent_yes": 70.67079996555584, "percent_no": 29.329200034444156, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.325298", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.719502", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.062556", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve severe overcrowding, improve safety for children, repair and renovate school facilities, and obtain eligibility for State funding for construction and renovation, including replacing portables with permanent classrooms, shall the Santa Ana Unified School District be authorized to issue $145,150,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, construct, and improve school sites and facilities, an establish a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee funds are spent only for the specified purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10299, "fingerprint": "1999|199900021|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900021|ORANGE", "content_hash": "b559f9c6e5412142", "measure_id": "199900021", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the order of incorporation be confirmed, should the city be named: Laguna Verde or Laguna Woods?  (Yes=Laguna Verde; No=Laguna Woods)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2953, "no_votes": 5527, "total_votes": 8480, "percent_yes": 34.823113207547166, "percent_no": 65.17688679245283, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.717592", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.061280", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the order of incorporation be confirmed, should the city be named: Laguna Verde or Laguna Woods?  (Yes=Laguna Verde; No=Laguna Woods)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10301, "fingerprint": "1999|199900184|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900184|ORANGE", "content_hash": "21c71b03670930a5", "measure_id": "199900184", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on July 27,1999 by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as the incorporation of the new city of Rancho Santa Margarita subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order, including the establishment of an appropriations limit for the new city of Rancho Santa Margarita of $10,000,000.00 and the continuance of previously authorized charges, fees, assessments and taxes, be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4666, "no_votes": 909, "total_votes": 5575, "percent_yes": 83.69506726457399, "percent_no": 16.304932735426007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.718658", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.062010", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on July 27,1999 by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as the incorporation of the new city of Rancho Santa Margarita subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order, including the establishment of an appropriations limit for the new city of Rancho Santa Margarita of $10,000,000.00 and the continuance of previously authorized charges, fees, assessments and taxes, be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10300, "fingerprint": "1999|199900094|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900094|ORANGE", "content_hash": "6dabfc924020ad8f", "measure_id": "199900094", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve the quality of education by providing students with access to classroom computer technology, upgraded plumbing, ventilation and electrical systems and by making the District eligible to receive State matching funds to repair and upgrade schools throughout the District, shall the Brea Olinda Unified School District issue $27 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit to acquire, construct and improve schools throughout the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3099, "no_votes": 807, "total_votes": 3906, "percent_yes": 79.3394777265745, "percent_no": 20.6605222734255, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.718392", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.061830", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve the quality of education by providing students with access to classroom computer technology, upgraded plumbing, ventilation and electrical systems and by making the District eligible to receive State matching funds to repair and upgrade schools throughout the District, shall the Brea Olinda Unified School District issue $27 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit to acquire, construct and improve schools throughout the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10303, "fingerprint": "1999|199900040|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900040|PLACER", "content_hash": "32869b4bb213a8c4", "measure_id": "199900040", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, construct, renovate, repair and improve safety conditions of local Truckee area schools, shall the School Facility Improvement District No. 1 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, with citizen's oversight committee and annual audits, acquire school sites, build middle school, upgrade school facilities and sites, add classrooms, security systems, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate computers, and replace worn roofs by issuing $35 million of bonds, at rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 240, "no_votes": 96, "total_votes": 336, "percent_yes": 71.42857142857143, "percent_no": 28.57142857142857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.720444", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.063103", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, construct, renovate, repair and improve safety conditions of local Truckee area schools, shall the School Facility Improvement District No. 1 of the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, with citizen's oversight committee and annual audits, acquire school sites, build middle school, upgrade school facilities and sites, add classrooms, security systems, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate computers, and replace worn roofs by issuing $35 million of bonds, at rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10304, "fingerprint": "1999|199900041|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900041|PLACER", "content_hash": "ec5d1c0d132005ae", "measure_id": "199900041", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and rehabilitate only Lake Tahoe area schools to meet current health, safety, accessibility, technology and instructional standards, including repairing aging roofs, deteriorated plumbing, heating, cooling and electrical systems, refurbishing classrooms, restrooms, and constructing classrooms and schools facilities, shall the Lakeside area School Facility Improvement District No.2 of the Tahoe Unified School District, with citizen oversight and annual audits, issue $24 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1415, "no_votes": 404, "total_votes": 1819, "percent_yes": 77.78999450247389, "percent_no": 22.21000549752611, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.720718", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.063291", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and rehabilitate only Lake Tahoe area schools to meet current health, safety, accessibility, technology and instructional standards, including repairing aging roofs, deteriorated plumbing, heating, cooling and electrical systems, refurbishing classrooms, restrooms, and constructing classrooms and schools facilities, shall the Lakeside area School Facility Improvement District No.2 of the Tahoe Unified School District, with citizen oversight and annual audits, issue $24 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10302, "fingerprint": "1999|199900039|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900039|PLACER", "content_hash": "b9ab1a2f3ffdaae3", "measure_id": "199900039", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair local school classrooms and buildings and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the Placer Union High School District issue $41.5 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, upgrade science labs and electrical wiring for technology, provide adequate classrooms for students, acquire and construct local school facilities to relieve overcrowding, and appoint a citizens oversight committee to guarantee funds area spent only on school improvement costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12570, "no_votes": 5491, "total_votes": 18061, "percent_yes": 69.59747522285588, "percent_no": 30.402524777144123, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.720054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.062922", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair local school classrooms and buildings and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the Placer Union High School District issue $41.5 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, upgrade science labs and electrical wiring for technology, provide adequate classrooms for students, acquire and construct local school facilities to relieve overcrowding, and appoint a citizens oversight committee to guarantee funds area spent only on school improvement costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10310, "fingerprint": "1999|199900112|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900112|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "5315e17c6d0f13f4", "measure_id": "199900112", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Debbie Cornett be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1324, "no_votes": 1090, "total_votes": 2414, "percent_yes": 54.84672742336372, "percent_no": 45.15327257663628, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-08-24", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.722465", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.064380", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Debbie Cornett be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10311, "fingerprint": "1999|199900113|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900113|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b316e68b1c40ebe3", "measure_id": "199900113", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall James L. Smedley be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1350, "no_votes": 1059, "total_votes": 2409, "percent_yes": 56.039850560398506, "percent_no": 43.960149439601494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-08-24", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.722728", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.064558", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall James L. Smedley be recalled (removed) from the office of City Council Member, City of San Jacinto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10305, "fingerprint": "1999|199900001|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900001|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "364ecf9b9f5415b0", "measure_id": "199900001", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on September 15, 1998, by the City Council of the City of Murrieta ordering the reorganization to annex to the City of Murrieta the territory described in that order and designated as \"LAFCO 96-13-3\" be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29, "no_votes": 21, "total_votes": 50, "percent_yes": 57.99999999999999, "percent_no": 42.00000000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-01-12", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.720994", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.063473", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on September 15, 1998, by the City Council of the City of Murrieta ordering the reorganization to annex to the City of Murrieta the territory described in that order and designated as \"LAFCO 96-13-3\" be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10306, "fingerprint": "1999|199900081|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900081|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "aa46515b91a34850", "measure_id": "199900081", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall any new voter-approved utility users tax be used only to fund the City of Desert Hot Springs Police Department and the fire protection, fire prevention, rescue and medical aid agreement between the city and Riverside County Fire Department?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1326, "no_votes": 453, "total_votes": 1779, "percent_yes": 74.53625632377741, "percent_no": 25.46374367622259, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.721298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.063655", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall any new voter-approved utility users tax be used only to fund the City of Desert Hot Springs Police Department and the fire protection, fire prevention, rescue and medical aid agreement between the city and Riverside County Fire Department?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10307, "fingerprint": "1999|199900082|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900082|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "43e0124ed3a4a31c", "measure_id": "199900082", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should a utility users tax ordinance imposing a five percent tax on amounts paid by users for utility services and having an expiration date of June 30, 2000 be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1257, "no_votes": 576, "total_votes": 1833, "percent_yes": 68.57610474631751, "percent_no": 31.42389525368249, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.721652", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.063838", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should a utility users tax ordinance imposing a five percent tax on amounts paid by users for utility services and having an expiration date of June 30, 2000 be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10308, "fingerprint": "1999|199900105|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900105|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "ba34ad1aca2bbdd8", "measure_id": "199900105", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Riverside be authorized to establish a Special Tax of $35.00 per parcel per year, plus a one time charge of $5.00 for the cost of this election, on all parcels within Zone \"B\" (Pine Cover, Mountain Center and Stone Creek areas) of CSA 153 to finance Recreation Services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 167, "no_votes": 117, "total_votes": 284, "percent_yes": 58.80281690140845, "percent_no": 41.19718309859155, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-07-13", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.721928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.064022", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Riverside be authorized to establish a Special Tax of $35.00 per parcel per year, plus a one time charge of $5.00 for the cost of this election, on all parcels within Zone \"B\" (Pine Cover, Mountain Center and Stone Creek areas) of CSA 153 to finance Recreation Services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10309, "fingerprint": "1999|199900106|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900106|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "3d18afd2b9583aaa", "measure_id": "199900106", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Santa Rosa Community Services District be authorized to levy a Special Tax not to exceed $13.50 per acre for fiscal year 1999-2000 and to increase this tax by an amount not to exceed 10% for fiscal years 2000-12001 and 2001-2002 only to pay for extended sheriff services to the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 260, "no_votes": 66, "total_votes": 326, "percent_yes": 79.75460122699386, "percent_no": 20.245398773006144, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-07-13", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.722197", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.064201", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Rosa Community Services District be authorized to levy a Special Tax not to exceed $13.50 per acre for fiscal year 1999-2000 and to increase this tax by an amount not to exceed 10% for fiscal years 2000-12001 and 2001-2002 only to pay for extended sheriff services to the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10312, "fingerprint": "1999|199900118|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900118|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8666e61b85adecc5", "measure_id": "199900118", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Riverside be authorized to levy a new Special Tax of $30.00 per parcel per year on all parcels within CSA 143 Vail Ranch to finance the operations and maintenance of a new Swim and Tennis Club?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 413, "no_votes": 398, "total_votes": 811, "percent_yes": 50.924784217016025, "percent_no": 49.075215782983975, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-21", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.722996", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.064743", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Riverside be authorized to levy a new Special Tax of $30.00 per parcel per year on all parcels within CSA 143 Vail Ranch to finance the operations and maintenance of a new Swim and Tennis Club?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10313, "fingerprint": "1999|199900134|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900134|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "9bb922bf3d37f70c", "measure_id": "199900134", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Pursuant to Proposition 218, shall a ten-year Special Community Services Tax Ordinance replacing the Community Services District levy be approved that does not increase the amount currently paid by property owners for law enforcement, anti-gang, landscape, parks, recreation, blow sand control, street lighting, traffic signal, street sweeping services and directly related administrative costs and provides for an annual cost of living adjustment of three percent or the Consumer Price Index, whichever is less?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1667, "no_votes": 2088, "total_votes": 3755, "percent_yes": 44.39414114513981, "percent_no": 55.60585885486019, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.723264", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.064926", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Pursuant to Proposition 218, shall a ten-year Special Community Services Tax Ordinance replacing the Community Services District levy be approved that does not increase the amount currently paid by property owners for law enforcement, anti-gang, landscape, parks, recreation, blow sand control, street lighting, traffic signal, street sweeping services and directly related administrative costs and provides for an annual cost of living adjustment of three percent or the Consumer Price Index, whichever is less?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10323, "fingerprint": "1999|199900190|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900190|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "199900190", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 915, "no_votes": 1491, "total_votes": 2406, "percent_yes": 38.02992518703242, "percent_no": 61.97007481296758, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.726094", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.066776", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10324, "fingerprint": "1999|199900191|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900191|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "640261a6fe7ddcec", "measure_id": "199900191", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "ADVISORY VOTE ONLY-ANNEXATION:  Shall the parcels in the Vail Ranch and Redhawk annexation area (LAFCO 98-14-1) be annexed to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District, contingent upon 2/3 voter approval of the City's special tax and Temecula Community Services District's rates and charges on this ballot?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1113, "no_votes": 629, "total_votes": 1742, "percent_yes": 63.89207807118255, "percent_no": 36.10792192881745, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.726360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.066965", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "ADVISORY VOTE ONLY-ANNEXATION:  Shall the parcels in the Vail Ranch and Redhawk annexation area (LAFCO 98-14-1) be annexed to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District, contingent upon 2/3 voter approval of the City's special tax and Temecula Community Services District's rates and charges on this ballot?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10316, "fingerprint": "1999|199900137|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900137|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "71fa0a461b1f3bc4", "measure_id": "199900137", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(CSA 143-Vail Ranch) Shall an Ordinance of the City of Temecula be adopted replacing the existing County Service Area No. 143 tax levied against parcels within the annexation area with a tax consistent wiht the City's special tax which shall only be used for parks, recreational facilities, recreational and community services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 702, "no_votes": 77, "total_votes": 779, "percent_yes": 90.11553273427472, "percent_no": 9.884467265725277, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.724127", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.065474", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(CSA 143-Vail Ranch) Shall an Ordinance of the City of Temecula be adopted replacing the existing County Service Area No. 143 tax levied against parcels within the annexation area with a tax consistent wiht the City's special tax which shall only be used for parks, recreational facilities, recreational and community services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10317, "fingerprint": "1999|199900138|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900138|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "43ea338eeb8f2c33", "measure_id": "199900138", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(CSA 143-Vail Ranch) Shall a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District be adopted replacing existing County Service Area No. 143 assessments and charges levied against parcels within the Vail Ranch annexation area with rates and charges which shall only be used for residential lighting, slop maintenance and refuse collection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 689, "no_votes": 72, "total_votes": 761, "percent_yes": 90.53876478318004, "percent_no": 9.461235216819958, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.724396", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.065654", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(CSA 143-Vail Ranch) Shall a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District be adopted replacing existing County Service Area No. 143 assessments and charges levied against parcels within the Vail Ranch annexation area with rates and charges which shall only be used for residential lighting, slop maintenance and refuse collection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10314, "fingerprint": "1999|199900135|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900135|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "5ead550385b10e70", "measure_id": "199900135", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(CSA 143-Redhawk) Shall an Ordinance of the City of Temecula be adopted replacing the existing County Service Area No. 143 tax levied against parcels within the annexation area with a tax consistent with the City's special tax which shall only be used for parks, recreation facilities, recreational and community service programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 373, "no_votes": 566, "total_votes": 939, "percent_yes": 39.72310969116081, "percent_no": 60.27689030883919, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.723593", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.065110", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(CSA 143-Redhawk) Shall an Ordinance of the City of Temecula be adopted replacing the existing County Service Area No. 143 tax levied against parcels within the annexation area with a tax consistent with the City's special tax which shall only be used for parks, recreation facilities, recreational and community service programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10315, "fingerprint": "1999|199900136|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900136|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "57eab574350d07f8", "measure_id": "199900136", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(CSA 143-Redhawk) Shall a Resolution of the Board of Directos of the Temecula Community Services District be adopted replacing existing County Service Area No. 143 assessments and charges levied against parcels within the Redhawk annexation area with rates and charges which shall only be used for residential lighting, slop maintenance, and refuse collection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 381, "no_votes": 554, "total_votes": 935, "percent_yes": 40.74866310160428, "percent_no": 59.25133689839572, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.723862", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.065294", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(CSA 143-Redhawk) Shall a Resolution of the Board of Directos of the Temecula Community Services District be adopted replacing existing County Service Area No. 143 assessments and charges levied against parcels within the Redhawk annexation area with rates and charges which shall only be used for residential lighting, slop maintenance, and refuse collection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10325, "fingerprint": "1999|199900249|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900249|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b18808f535b98cff", "measure_id": "199900249", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For increasing the number of members of the governing board of Palo Verde Community College District from five to seven.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 753, "no_votes": 433, "total_votes": 1186, "percent_yes": 63.490725126475546, "percent_no": 36.509274873524454, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.726626", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.067148", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For increasing the number of members of the governing board of Palo Verde Community College District from five to seven.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10326, "fingerprint": "1999|199900250|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900250|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "266a4c7e52486d10", "measure_id": "199900250", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the establishment of trustee areas in Palo Verde Community College District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 756, "no_votes": 393, "total_votes": 1149, "percent_yes": 65.79634464751958, "percent_no": 34.203655352480425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.726893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.067329", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the establishment of trustee areas in Palo Verde Community College District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10327, "fingerprint": "1999|199900251|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900251|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "92b2ced2a83a7026", "measure_id": "199900251", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the election of one member, or more than one member, of the governing board of the Palo Verde Community College District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 760, "no_votes": 395, "total_votes": 1155, "percent_yes": 65.80086580086581, "percent_no": 34.19913419913419, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.727156", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.067508", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the election of one member, or more than one member, of the governing board of the Palo Verde Community College District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10328, "fingerprint": "1999|199900252|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900252|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f3d9c51fea231838", "measure_id": "199900252", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions at Perris and Paloma Valley High schools, relieve overcrowding, replace inadequate, unsafe electrical and heating systems, roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, renovate bathrooms and repair, construct and acquire classrooms and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the Perris Union High School district be authorized to issue $16 million in bonds at the lowest interest rates available, and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to ensure funds are spent only on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4968, "no_votes": 2068, "total_votes": 7036, "percent_yes": 70.60830017055146, "percent_no": 29.39169982944854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.727427", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.067688", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions at Perris and Paloma Valley High schools, relieve overcrowding, replace inadequate, unsafe electrical and heating systems, roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, renovate bathrooms and repair, construct and acquire classrooms and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the Perris Union High School district be authorized to issue $16 million in bonds at the lowest interest rates available, and appoint a Citizen's Oversight Committee to ensure funds are spent only on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10318, "fingerprint": "1999|199900185|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900185|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "f2dc4a62285fbf14", "measure_id": "199900185", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the citizen initiated charter amendment to prohibit leasing or selling the wastewater treatment plant to a private entity; to prohibit sewer fees and charges that exceed the costs of services, or are to pay administrative expenses of the city's general fund; and to prohibit borrowing by the city from the wastewater fund except for a declared emergency, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4939, "no_votes": 2917, "total_votes": 7856, "percent_yes": 62.86914460285132, "percent_no": 37.13085539714868, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.724662", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.065835", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the citizen initiated charter amendment to prohibit leasing or selling the wastewater treatment plant to a private entity; to prohibit sewer fees and charges that exceed the costs of services, or are to pay administrative expenses of the city's general fund; and to prohibit borrowing by the city from the wastewater fund except for a declared emergency, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10319, "fingerprint": "1999|199900186|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900186|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2c42a17c49bfe62f", "measure_id": "199900186", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the city council initiated charter amendment to permit privatization of the wastewater treatment plant where the city sets rates; where rates can be decreased; where sewer fees and charges are limited consistent with State Law; and where borrowing from enterprise funds is prohibited except in cases of a declared emergency or with a vote of the people, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2579, "no_votes": 5200, "total_votes": 7779, "percent_yes": 33.15336161460342, "percent_no": 66.84663838539657, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.725007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.066023", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city council initiated charter amendment to permit privatization of the wastewater treatment plant where the city sets rates; where rates can be decreased; where sewer fees and charges are limited consistent with State Law; and where borrowing from enterprise funds is prohibited except in cases of a declared emergency or with a vote of the people, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10320, "fingerprint": "1999|199900187|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900187|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "137eafee28f4b5b5", "measure_id": "199900187", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Utility Tax on users of telephone services, electricity, gas and co-generated electricity be continued at a rate of 5%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3592, "no_votes": 4131, "total_votes": 7723, "percent_yes": 46.51042341059174, "percent_no": 53.48957658940826, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.725274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.066206", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Utility Tax on users of telephone services, electricity, gas and co-generated electricity be continued at a rate of 5%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10321, "fingerprint": "1999|199900188|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900188|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "77fa129a86f2998f", "measure_id": "199900188", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Utility Tax on users of telephone services, electricity, gas and co-generated electricity be continued at a rate of 5% with no less than 50% to be used for Public Safety?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3307, "no_votes": 4183, "total_votes": 7490, "percent_yes": 44.15220293724967, "percent_no": 55.84779706275033, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.725541", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.066392", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Utility Tax on users of telephone services, electricity, gas and co-generated electricity be continued at a rate of 5% with no less than 50% to be used for Public Safety?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10322, "fingerprint": "1999|199900189|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900189|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b5cf49fb9c6c21d5", "measure_id": "199900189", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall $400,000 of the revenue resulting from the continuance of the utility user tax at 5% be used for the purpose of funding parks, recreation and leisure activities, facilities and improvements in the city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4213, "no_votes": 3480, "total_votes": 7693, "percent_yes": 54.76407123358897, "percent_no": 45.23592876641103, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.725820", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.066571", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall $400,000 of the revenue resulting from the continuance of the utility user tax at 5% be used for the purpose of funding parks, recreation and leisure activities, facilities and improvements in the city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10330, "fingerprint": "1999|199900064|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900064|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "bab1d798dac3f3bb", "measure_id": "199900064", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce student overcrowding, build a second comprehensive high school, provide students with access to classroom computer and science technology, build permanent classrooms and facilities, upgrade and repair schools throughout the District and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall Galt Joint Union High School District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1659, "no_votes": 1162, "total_votes": 2821, "percent_yes": 58.80893300248139, "percent_no": 41.19106699751861, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.728167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.068056", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce student overcrowding, build a second comprehensive high school, provide students with access to classroom computer and science technology, build permanent classrooms and facilities, upgrade and repair schools throughout the District and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall Galt Joint Union High School District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10329, "fingerprint": "1999|199900063|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900063|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "2619c1536cef849a", "measure_id": "199900063", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable the Galt Elementary School District to acquire and construct a new middle school and a new elementary school on sites already owned by the District, and to acquire and construct other necessary student facilities, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $7 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum set by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1578, "no_votes": 852, "total_votes": 2430, "percent_yes": 64.93827160493827, "percent_no": 35.061728395061735, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.727695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.067873", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable the Galt Elementary School District to acquire and construct a new middle school and a new elementary school on sites already owned by the District, and to acquire and construct other necessary student facilities, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $7 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum set by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10331, "fingerprint": "1999|199900095|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900095|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "7ed39b164d986748", "measure_id": "199900095", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct, renovate and repair only Folsom schools, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $18.1 million at an interest rate within the legal limit, to finish Folsom High School classrooms and stadium, build a gym at Folsom Middle School, modernize and provide technology for existing Folsom schools, and construct school facilities in Folsom?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3990, "no_votes": 2109, "total_votes": 6099, "percent_yes": 65.42056074766354, "percent_no": 34.579439252336456, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.728440", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.068239", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, renovate and repair only Folsom schools, shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 of the Folsom Cordova Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $18.1 million at an interest rate within the legal limit, to finish Folsom High School classrooms and stadium, build a gym at Folsom Middle School, modernize and provide technology for existing Folsom schools, and construct school facilities in Folsom?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10332, "fingerprint": "1999|199900128|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900128|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "ab4c19a545732585", "measure_id": "199900128", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, replace, acquire and construct school buildings, provide wiring for computers, meet fire/health/safety standards; provide needed heating/air conditioning improvements and construct a high school to alleviate overcrowding, shall the Sacramento City Unified School District issue $195,000,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible and appoint a citizens' oversight committee and an independent auditor to assure that funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28289, "no_votes": 7664, "total_votes": 35953, "percent_yes": 78.68328095012933, "percent_no": 21.31671904987067, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-10-19", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.728708", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.068421", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, replace, acquire and construct school buildings, provide wiring for computers, meet fire/health/safety standards; provide needed heating/air conditioning improvements and construct a high school to alleviate overcrowding, shall the Sacramento City Unified School District issue $195,000,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible and appoint a citizens' oversight committee and an independent auditor to assure that funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10333, "fingerprint": "1999|199900253|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900253|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "c937fb63d802abe0", "measure_id": "199900253", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To authorize Grant Joint Union High School district to finance school improvements including:  acquiring and constructing new science and other classrooms to support science curriculum, and relieve overcrowding rehabilitating renovating and modernizing buildings and grounds, installing safety/security systems, upgrading outdated electrical, mechanical and water systems and funding approximately $10,845,000 to match $33,510,000 in State modernization grants and $2,465,000 in State new construction grants, shall the District issue $67,575,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6224, "no_votes": 3755, "total_votes": 9979, "percent_yes": 62.37097905601764, "percent_no": 37.62902094398236, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.729079", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.068604", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To authorize Grant Joint Union High School district to finance school improvements including:  acquiring and constructing new science and other classrooms to support science curriculum, and relieve overcrowding rehabilitating renovating and modernizing buildings and grounds, installing safety/security systems, upgrading outdated electrical, mechanical and water systems and funding approximately $10,845,000 to match $33,510,000 in State modernization grants and $2,465,000 in State new construction grants, shall the District issue $67,575,000 in bonds at lawful interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12179, "fingerprint": "1999|199900255|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900255|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f23c4bbb8f91a9e2", "measure_id": "199900255", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the action of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges approving the formations of the Copper Mountain Community College District in San Bernardino County, which was formerly the Copper Mountain Campus of the Desert Community College District in Riverside and San Bernardino counties, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3659, "no_votes": 396, "total_votes": 4055, "percent_yes": 90.23427866831074, "percent_no": 9.765721331689264, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.340948", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.734509", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.072065", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the action of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges approving the formations of the Copper Mountain Community College District in San Bernardino County, which was formerly the Copper Mountain Campus of the Desert Community College District in Riverside and San Bernardino counties, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10336, "fingerprint": "1999|199900065|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900065|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c84a4fb2bca32136", "measure_id": "199900065", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, construct, renovate, and repair local schools and improve safety conditions for our students, shall the San Bernardino City Unified School District, with annual audits, upgrade school facilities, including electrical wiring, heating, cooling, and plumbing systems, expand and upgrade computer technology, acquire classrooms, multi-use rooms, and school sites by issuing $50 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7500, "no_votes": 3271, "total_votes": 10771, "percent_yes": 69.63141769566428, "percent_no": 30.368582304335717, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.730045", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.069154", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, construct, renovate, and repair local schools and improve safety conditions for our students, shall the San Bernardino City Unified School District, with annual audits, upgrade school facilities, including electrical wiring, heating, cooling, and plumbing systems, expand and upgrade computer technology, acquire classrooms, multi-use rooms, and school sites by issuing $50 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10348, "fingerprint": "1999|199900254|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900254|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "8b820d7820be0f8d", "measure_id": "199900254", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, upgrade and renovate Crestline Elementary's, Cameron Elementary's and Skyline North Elementary's classrooms and school buildings and improve existing school sites, shall the Barstow Unified School District make necessary safety repairs, renovate, construct and acquire classrooms, science and computer labs, libraries and school facilities; upgrade deteriorating roofs, bathrooms, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; and rewire classrooms for computer technology, by issuing $20 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2489, "no_votes": 1994, "total_votes": 4483, "percent_yes": 55.52085656926165, "percent_no": 44.47914343073835, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.734242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.071885", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, upgrade and renovate Crestline Elementary's, Cameron Elementary's and Skyline North Elementary's classrooms and school buildings and improve existing school sites, shall the Barstow Unified School District make necessary safety repairs, renovate, construct and acquire classrooms, science and computer labs, libraries and school facilities; upgrade deteriorating roofs, bathrooms, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; and rewire classrooms for computer technology, by issuing $20 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12176, "fingerprint": "1999|199900195|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900195|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "a15c86f01425b549", "measure_id": "199900195", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall BARBARA LOUX BE RECALLED from the Office of Member of Town Council (Term Ending November 2000)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7313, "no_votes": 884, "total_votes": 8197, "percent_yes": 89.2155666707332, "percent_no": 10.784433329266804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.338713", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.731800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.070242", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall BARBARA LOUX BE RECALLED from the Office of Member of Town Council (Term Ending November 2000)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10337, "fingerprint": "1999|199900077|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900077|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "8b1147e8f4ace316", "measure_id": "199900077", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Snowline Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue in the maximum amount not to exceed Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) at a rate not to exceed the statutory maximum to acquire and construct one elementary school facility to reduce overcrowding?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1438, "no_votes": 732, "total_votes": 2170, "percent_yes": 66.26728110599078, "percent_no": 33.732718894009224, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-05-18", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.730312", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.069336", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Snowline Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue in the maximum amount not to exceed Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) at a rate not to exceed the statutory maximum to acquire and construct one elementary school facility to reduce overcrowding?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10342, "fingerprint": "1999|199900196|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900196|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6a5b2744b1524053", "measure_id": "199900196", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall PATRICK JACOBO BE RECALLED from the Office of Member of Town Council (Term Ending November 2002)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7044, "no_votes": 974, "total_votes": 8018, "percent_yes": 87.85233225243203, "percent_no": 12.147667747567965, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.732077", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.070420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall PATRICK JACOBO BE RECALLED from the Office of Member of Town Council (Term Ending November 2002)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10343, "fingerprint": "1999|199900197|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900197|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "eb988408406eaf30", "measure_id": "199900197", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall DAVID HOLMAN BE RECALLED from the Office of Member of Town Council (Term Ending November 2000)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7018, "no_votes": 1014, "total_votes": 8032, "percent_yes": 87.37549800796812, "percent_no": 12.624501992031881, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.732341", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.070597", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall DAVID HOLMAN BE RECALLED from the Office of Member of Town Council (Term Ending November 2000)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10338, "fingerprint": "1999|199900115|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900115|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3d4ad44e9c55aafc", "measure_id": "199900115", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding and renovate school facilities for our students, shall Rialto Unified School District, acquire, repair, construct and upgrade school sites and facilities, including adding classrooms; building additional schools; improving security systems; removing asbestos; upgrading electrical wiring, including wiring to support classroom computers; renovating water and sewer lines; renovating heating, cooling and plumbing systems; and renovating bathrooms by issuing $60 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3519, "no_votes": 1040, "total_votes": 4559, "percent_yes": 77.187979820136, "percent_no": 22.812020179864007, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.730583", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.069516", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding and renovate school facilities for our students, shall Rialto Unified School District, acquire, repair, construct and upgrade school sites and facilities, including adding classrooms; building additional schools; improving security systems; removing asbestos; upgrading electrical wiring, including wiring to support classroom computers; renovating water and sewer lines; renovating heating, cooling and plumbing systems; and renovating bathrooms by issuing $60 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10339, "fingerprint": "1999|199900192|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900192|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "afdc0634368ff255", "measure_id": "199900192", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall ordinance be adopted Readopting Goals and Policies of Land Use Element of Ton of Apple Valley General Plan \"(GP)\", as Adopted 9/10/91, Readopting 9/10/91, Adopted Land Use Designations and Land Use Policy Map and Equestrian Neighborhood Map of Land Use Element of GP as Amended Through 1/1/99, and Restricting GP Amendments Regarding Single Family Residential (R-SF) (1 Dwelling Unit Per 0.4 to 0.9 Net Acres) Through 12/31/2020 Except Voter Approved Amendments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6759, "no_votes": 1308, "total_votes": 8067, "percent_yes": 83.78579397545556, "percent_no": 16.21420602454444, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.730928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.069697", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ordinance be adopted Readopting Goals and Policies of Land Use Element of Ton of Apple Valley General Plan \"(GP)\", as Adopted 9/10/91, Readopting 9/10/91, Adopted Land Use Designations and Land Use Policy Map and Equestrian Neighborhood Map of Land Use Element of GP as Amended Through 1/1/99, and Restricting GP Amendments Regarding Single Family Residential (R-SF) (1 Dwelling Unit Per 0.4 to 0.9 Net Acres) Through 12/31/2020 Except Voter Approved Amendments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10340, "fingerprint": "1999|199900193|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900193|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "0c520d60f947caaf", "measure_id": "199900193", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance titled \"Apple Valley General Plan Protection Initiative\" Be adopted mandating General Plan be reviewed, and if determined necessary by voter approval or by the Town Council, amended at least every three years to ensure it continues to appropriately serve the community; such amendments shall encompass without limitation by this reference all land use and planning issues, land use designations, land use policy map, and goals and policies?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1395, "no_votes": 6647, "total_votes": 8042, "percent_yes": 17.34643123601094, "percent_no": 82.65356876398906, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.731199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.069880", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance titled \"Apple Valley General Plan Protection Initiative\" Be adopted mandating General Plan be reviewed, and if determined necessary by voter approval or by the Town Council, amended at least every three years to ensure it continues to appropriately serve the community; such amendments shall encompass without limitation by this reference all land use and planning issues, land use designations, land use policy map, and goals and policies?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10341, "fingerprint": "1999|199900194|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900194|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6858332a0fdb14ba", "measure_id": "199900194", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance titled \"Apple Valley Political Reform Initiative\" be adopted limiting the term of office for Town Council Members to 2 consecutive full 4 year terms; limiting Council Member compensation to amount allowed under Gov. Code 36516 (a) & (c) reduced by compensation from other town entities; limiting expense reimbursements to necessary expenses incurred in performance of their official duties approved by the Town Council; and prohibiting payment to them of other health and employment benefits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2869, "no_votes": 5136, "total_votes": 8005, "percent_yes": 35.84009993753904, "percent_no": 64.15990006246096, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.731469", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.070062", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance titled \"Apple Valley Political Reform Initiative\" be adopted limiting the term of office for Town Council Members to 2 consecutive full 4 year terms; limiting Council Member compensation to amount allowed under Gov. Code 36516 (a) & (c) reduced by compensation from other town entities; limiting expense reimbursements to necessary expenses incurred in performance of their official duties approved by the Town Council; and prohibiting payment to them of other health and employment benefits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10349, "fingerprint": "1999|199900256|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900256|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b18808f535b98cff", "measure_id": "199900256", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For increasing the number of members of the governing board of Palo Verde Community College District from five to seven.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 333, "no_votes": 152, "total_votes": 485, "percent_yes": 68.65979381443299, "percent_no": 31.340206185567013, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.734786", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.072244", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For increasing the number of members of the governing board of Palo Verde Community College District from five to seven.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10350, "fingerprint": "1999|199900257|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900257|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "266a4c7e52486d10", "measure_id": "199900257", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the establishment of trustee areas in Palo Verde Community College District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 344, "no_votes": 129, "total_votes": 473, "percent_yes": 72.72727272727273, "percent_no": 27.272727272727266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.735054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.072423", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the establishment of trustee areas in Palo Verde Community College District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10351, "fingerprint": "1999|199900258|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900258|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "92b2ced2a83a7026", "measure_id": "199900258", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the election of one member, or more than one member, of the governing board of the Palo Verde Community College District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 344, "no_votes": 119, "total_votes": 463, "percent_yes": 74.29805615550757, "percent_no": 25.701943844492433, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.735318", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.072602", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the election of one member, or more than one member, of the governing board of the Palo Verde Community College District residing in each trustee area elected by the registered voters in that trustee area.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10344, "fingerprint": "1999|199900198|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900198|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "8ae72e47ca4e0461", "measure_id": "199900198", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the Barstow City Council adopt an ordinance to allow the sale, possession and use of \"safe and sane\" fireworks within the City of Barstow?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1109, "no_votes": 1787, "total_votes": 2896, "percent_yes": 38.29419889502762, "percent_no": 61.70580110497238, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.732604", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.070785", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Barstow City Council adopt an ordinance to allow the sale, possession and use of \"safe and sane\" fireworks within the City of Barstow?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10345, "fingerprint": "1999|199900199|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900199|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "0e4bc2afe6e4da5c", "measure_id": "199900199", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the measure that requires voter approval to increase the number of residential units allowed by the City's General Plan and Zoning Map and to convert property currently zoned nonresidential to residential be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4141, "no_votes": 1322, "total_votes": 5463, "percent_yes": 75.80084202818963, "percent_no": 24.199157971810365, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.732872", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.070967", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the measure that requires voter approval to increase the number of residential units allowed by the City's General Plan and Zoning Map and to convert property currently zoned nonresidential to residential be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10346, "fingerprint": "1999|199900200|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900200|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "267484ef1d388f3d", "measure_id": "199900200", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2412, an initiative ordinance of the People of the City of Redlands amending the Growth Management, Design, Land Use and Circulation Elements of the Redlands General Plan relating to building permit and utility connection limitations, density limitations, scenic drives, historic properties, and circulation patterns in southeast Redlands, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4988, "no_votes": 5984, "total_votes": 10972, "percent_yes": 45.46117389719285, "percent_no": 54.53882610280715, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.733149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.071156", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2412, an initiative ordinance of the People of the City of Redlands amending the Growth Management, Design, Land Use and Circulation Elements of the Redlands General Plan relating to building permit and utility connection limitations, density limitations, scenic drives, historic properties, and circulation patterns in southeast Redlands, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12177, "fingerprint": "1999|199900201|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900201|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "82ca451035319f05", "measure_id": "199900201", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2414, an initiative ordinance of the People of the City of Redlands amending the Land Use, Circulation and Health and Safety Elements of the Redlands General Plan to establish a new residential land use classifications and change density standards in the San Timoteo Canyon and Live Oak Canyon areas, and establish grading limitations in those areas, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4662, "no_votes": 6237, "total_votes": 10899, "percent_yes": 42.77456647398844, "percent_no": 57.22543352601156, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.340140", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.733434", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.071340", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2414, an initiative ordinance of the People of the City of Redlands amending the Land Use, Circulation and Health and Safety Elements of the Redlands General Plan to establish a new residential land use classifications and change density standards in the San Timoteo Canyon and Live Oak Canyon areas, and establish grading limitations in those areas, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10334, "fingerprint": "1999|199900042|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900042|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "8533b2ac760c0a6a", "measure_id": "199900042", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, upgrade local schools and improve student safety, shall the Alta Loma Elementary School District acquire, repair, construct and upgrade School District land and facilities, including adding classrooms to existing schools to reduce class size, construct classrooms at Banyan Elementary, replace deteriorating portables, upgrade/install electrical wiring, improve plumbing systems, renovate restrooms, with no money for salaries, by issuing $25.8 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3296, "no_votes": 1026, "total_votes": 4322, "percent_yes": 76.26099028227672, "percent_no": 23.739009717723278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.729455", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.068786", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, upgrade local schools and improve student safety, shall the Alta Loma Elementary School District acquire, repair, construct and upgrade School District land and facilities, including adding classrooms to existing schools to reduce class size, construct classrooms at Banyan Elementary, replace deteriorating portables, upgrade/install electrical wiring, improve plumbing systems, renovate restrooms, with no money for salaries, by issuing $25.8 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10347, "fingerprint": "1999|199900202|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900202|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "cdc1cdfa5d43ae55", "measure_id": "199900202", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Approves a Charter Amendment to require the City to consolidate its general election with the county-wide election if such county-wide election occurs within sixty (60) days after the regularly scheduled City general election date.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8016, "no_votes": 1234, "total_votes": 9250, "percent_yes": 86.65945945945947, "percent_no": 13.34054054054053, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.733706", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.071520", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Approves a Charter Amendment to require the City to consolidate its general election with the county-wide election if such county-wide election occurs within sixty (60) days after the regularly scheduled City general election date.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12178, "fingerprint": "1999|199900203|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900203|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "849b0191ac03ac3f", "measure_id": "199900203", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which increases the existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 7% to 9%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 647, "no_votes": 491, "total_votes": 1138, "percent_yes": 56.85413005272408, "percent_no": 43.14586994727592, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.340546", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.733976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.071702", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which increases the existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 7% to 9%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10335, "fingerprint": "1999|199900043|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900043|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "aefcb4700f155d80", "measure_id": "199900043", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, make major repairs to local schools and improve safety for students, shall Chino Valley Unified School District be authorized to provide financing to acquire, repair, construct, and upgrade school, one high school, one K-8 or 7-8 school, and up to 3 elementary schools, upgrade electrical wiring, fire alarms, security systems, replace deteriorating plumbing and restrooms, by issuing $118,000,000 of bonds at rates within legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4194, "no_votes": 3075, "total_votes": 7269, "percent_yes": 57.69706974824598, "percent_no": 42.30293025175402, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.729772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.068973", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, make major repairs to local schools and improve safety for students, shall Chino Valley Unified School District be authorized to provide financing to acquire, repair, construct, and upgrade school, one high school, one K-8 or 7-8 school, and up to 3 elementary schools, upgrade electrical wiring, fire alarms, security systems, replace deteriorating plumbing and restrooms, by issuing $118,000,000 of bonds at rates within legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12182, "fingerprint": "1999|199900276|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900276|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "589e5f4dc2afde8c", "measure_id": "199900276", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Council Resolution 68-99 approving the Fanita Ranch General Plan amendment be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4265, "no_votes": 7799, "total_votes": 12064, "percent_yes": 35.353116710875334, "percent_no": 64.64688328912467, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-09", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.343357", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.737369", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.074036", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Council Resolution 68-99 approving the Fanita Ranch General Plan amendment be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12181, "fingerprint": "1999|199900116|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900116|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "8d15ab57060d1305", "measure_id": "199900116", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For an annual special tax in Community Facilities District No. 99-1 of the San Dieguito Union High School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1661, "no_votes": 22, "total_votes": 1683, "percent_yes": 98.69281045751634, "percent_no": 1.3071895424836555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.343076", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.737026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.073846", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For an annual special tax in Community Facilities District No. 99-1 of the San Dieguito Union High School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12180, "fingerprint": "1999|199900110|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900110|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1cb806f862fa66c5", "measure_id": "199900110", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the City of Escondido approve the following?  An initiative measure to restrict the franchise fee charged to solid waste contractors, require that residential solid waste contracts be submitted to bidding procedures and to establish non-exclusive franchises for commercial and industrial solid waste and recycling services.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4649, "no_votes": 9683, "total_votes": 14332, "percent_yes": 32.43790120011164, "percent_no": 67.56209879988836, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-08-17", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.342859", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.736753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.073615", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the City of Escondido approve the following?  An initiative measure to restrict the franchise fee charged to solid waste contractors, require that residential solid waste contracts be submitted to bidding procedures and to establish non-exclusive franchises for commercial and industrial solid waste and recycling services.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10354, "fingerprint": "1999|199900096|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900096|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c167239e38b82061", "measure_id": "199900096", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve classroom health, safety, and instruction in every neighborhood school by:  Reinforcing foundations of sinking schools; Repairing deteriorating roofs, drainage, heating, plumbing, and electrical systems; Upgrading fire security, disabled access, science laboratories, libraries, and computer wiring; Removing hazardous lead paint; Enabling Class-Size Reduction; Building schools/classrooms, shall the La Mesa-Springs Valley School District issue $33 million in bonds at legal interest rates with independent annual audit and no money for administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9367, "no_votes": 5078, "total_votes": 14445, "percent_yes": 64.84596746278989, "percent_no": 35.154032537210114, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.736215", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.073249", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve classroom health, safety, and instruction in every neighborhood school by:  Reinforcing foundations of sinking schools; Repairing deteriorating roofs, drainage, heating, plumbing, and electrical systems; Upgrading fire security, disabled access, science laboratories, libraries, and computer wiring; Removing hazardous lead paint; Enabling Class-Size Reduction; Building schools/classrooms, shall the La Mesa-Springs Valley School District issue $33 million in bonds at legal interest rates with independent annual audit and no money for administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12183, "fingerprint": "1999|199900277|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900277|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5fe14cf2bc6543ac", "measure_id": "199900277", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Council Resolution 70-99 approving the Fanita Ranch Specific Plan be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4261, "no_votes": 7807, "total_votes": 12068, "percent_yes": 35.30825323168711, "percent_no": 64.6917467683129, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-09", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.343660", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.737635", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.074216", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Council Resolution 70-99 approving the Fanita Ranch Specific Plan be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10355, "fingerprint": "1999|199900097|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900097|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9eae7e62cc5da0ee", "measure_id": "199900097", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety and instruction in every neighborhood school by:  Building schools to alleviate over-crowding; Building classrooms to continue class size reduction; Replacing outdated plumbing, heating and ventilation systems; Upgrading science laboratories; Rewiring schools for computer technology, shall the Vista Unified School District issue $96 million in bonds at legal rates of interest to acquire, construct and improve school facilities with independent Citizens Oversight Committee, independent annual audit without expenditures for teachers or administrators' salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11230, "no_votes": 6165, "total_votes": 17395, "percent_yes": 64.55878125898246, "percent_no": 35.441218741017536, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.736485", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.073433", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety and instruction in every neighborhood school by:  Building schools to alleviate over-crowding; Building classrooms to continue class size reduction; Replacing outdated plumbing, heating and ventilation systems; Upgrading science laboratories; Rewiring schools for computer technology, shall the Vista Unified School District issue $96 million in bonds at legal rates of interest to acquire, construct and improve school facilities with independent Citizens Oversight Committee, independent annual audit without expenditures for teachers or administrators' salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10356, "fingerprint": "1999|199900278|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900278|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "213528421f292fd9", "measure_id": "199900278", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In the event Measures \"A\" and \"B\" fail, shall the Santee City Council pursue acquiring the Fanita Ranch Property to be preserved as open space recognizing such action may require an increase in taxes of up to $150 per residential unit and commercial, industrial, or institutional buildings to increase the City's general operating budget for general municipal purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1637, "no_votes": 10304, "total_votes": 11941, "percent_yes": 13.70906959216146, "percent_no": 86.29093040783854, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-09", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.737901", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.074399", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In the event Measures \"A\" and \"B\" fail, shall the Santee City Council pursue acquiring the Fanita Ranch Property to be preserved as open space recognizing such action may require an increase in taxes of up to $150 per residential unit and commercial, industrial, or institutional buildings to increase the City's general operating budget for general municipal purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10353, "fingerprint": "1999|199900049|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900049|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bc5481b2d70084ad", "measure_id": "199900049", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To improve community and branch libraries:  Build and repair Local Libraries; Purchase Books and Materials; Extend Service Hours; Modernize with Computers and New technology; Expand Youth Reading and Homework programs; Enhance Literacy and Senior Services, Shall an Ordinance be approved to (1) adopt for five years only a 1/4 of 1% sales tax exclusively for the purposes stated herein, and (2) establish a strictly audited appropriations limit for library purposes only?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 167110, "no_votes": 165582, "total_votes": 332692, "percent_yes": 50.22964183088262, "percent_no": 49.77035816911738, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-16", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.735943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.073059", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve community and branch libraries:  Build and repair Local Libraries; Purchase Books and Materials; Extend Service Hours; Modernize with Computers and New technology; Expand Youth Reading and Homework programs; Enhance Literacy and Senior Services, Shall an Ordinance be approved to (1) adopt for five years only a 1/4 of 1% sales tax exclusively for the purposes stated herein, and (2) establish a strictly audited appropriations limit for library purposes only?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10352, "fingerprint": "1999|199900044|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900044|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "77d0fb148d887cf7", "measure_id": "199900044", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Valley Center Union School District and the Pauma School District and that portion of the Escondido Union High School District located within the boundaries of the Valley Center Union School District and the Pauma School District be formed into the Valley Center Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3222, "no_votes": 417, "total_votes": 3639, "percent_yes": 88.54080791426216, "percent_no": 11.45919208573784, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.735587", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.072834", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Valley Center Union School District and the Pauma School District and that portion of the Escondido Union High School District located within the boundaries of the Valley Center Union School District and the Pauma School District be formed into the Valley Center Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10357, "fingerprint": "1999|199900139|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900139|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "afe64b0da22fd0e7", "measure_id": "199900139", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City and County incur bonded debt and/or other evidences of indebtedness and/or undertake lease financing, in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $299,000,000, for the acquisition, improvement, construction and/or reconstruction of a new health care, assisted living and/or other type of continuing care facility or facilities to replace Laguna Honda Hospital, and reduce the property tax impact by requiring the application of available tobacco settlement revenues received by the City and County that are required to be used to fund these facilities, (a) to finance the acquisition, improvement, construction and/or reconstruction costs of such facilities, and (b) to pay the principal and redemption price of, interest on, reserve fund deposits, if any, and/or financing costs for the obligations authorized thereby?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 139210, "no_votes": 50809, "total_votes": 190019, "percent_yes": 73.26109494313727, "percent_no": 26.738905056862734, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.738231", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.074579", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City and County incur bonded debt and/or other evidences of indebtedness and/or undertake lease financing, in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $299,000,000, for the acquisition, improvement, construction and/or reconstruction of a new health care, assisted living and/or other type of continuing care facility or facilities to replace Laguna Honda Hospital, and reduce the property tax impact by requiring the application of available tobacco settlement revenues received by the City and County that are required to be used to fund these facilities, (a) to finance the acquisition, improvement, construction and/or reconstruction costs of such facilities, and (b) to pay the principal and redemption price of, interest on, reserve fund deposits, if any, and/or financing costs for the obligations authorized thereby?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10358, "fingerprint": "1999|199900140|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900140|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "f322f50cf2f9fc9b", "measure_id": "199900140", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall firefighters and police officers who transferred to the Tier 2 retirement plan in 1981 receive improvement retirement benefits given other Tier 2 members since then if they meet certain repayment conditions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 127897, "no_votes": 51183, "total_votes": 179080, "percent_yes": 71.41891891891892, "percent_no": 28.58108108108108, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.738502", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.074789", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall firefighters and police officers who transferred to the Tier 2 retirement plan in 1981 receive improvement retirement benefits given other Tier 2 members since then if they meet certain repayment conditions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10359, "fingerprint": "1999|199900141|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900141|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ee3d81151d8977e1", "measure_id": "199900141", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City make changes in how it defines the districts that will be used to elect members of the Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 123196, "no_votes": 48263, "total_votes": 171459, "percent_yes": 71.8515796779405, "percent_no": 28.148420322059494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.738772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.074973", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City make changes in how it defines the districts that will be used to elect members of the Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10360, "fingerprint": "1999|199900142|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900142|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "714321406cea8fe2", "measure_id": "199900142", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall City employees be allowed to donate sick leave or vacation credits to a pool for City employees who are catastrophically ill, and to donate vacation credits to be used by City employees to care for catastrophically ill spouses, domestic partners, and dependents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 138672, "no_votes": 44246, "total_votes": 182918, "percent_yes": 75.81101914519074, "percent_no": 24.18898085480926, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.739042", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.075163", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City employees be allowed to donate sick leave or vacation credits to a pool for City employees who are catastrophically ill, and to donate vacation credits to be used by City employees to care for catastrophically ill spouses, domestic partners, and dependents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10361, "fingerprint": "1999|199900143|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900143|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "adade685d89e428b", "measure_id": "199900143", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create a Municipal Transportation Agency with expanded powers and duties to run the Municipal Railway and the Department of Parking and Traffic?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 110079, "no_votes": 70113, "total_votes": 180192, "percent_yes": 61.08983750665956, "percent_no": 38.91016249334044, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.739310", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.075348", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create a Municipal Transportation Agency with expanded powers and duties to run the Municipal Railway and the Department of Parking and Traffic?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10362, "fingerprint": "1999|199900144|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900144|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "7d8c7e629a537f7a", "measure_id": "199900144", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City prohibit banks and other financial institutions from charging a fee to persons who do not have an account with that bank for use of the bank's automated teller machines in San Francisco?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 124615, "no_votes": 62978, "total_votes": 187593, "percent_yes": 66.42838485444554, "percent_no": 33.57161514555446, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.739580", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.075527", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City prohibit banks and other financial institutions from charging a fee to persons who do not have an account with that bank for use of the bank's automated teller machines in San Francisco?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10363, "fingerprint": "1999|199900145|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900145|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "14ea8032d88edde2", "measure_id": "199900145", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City make changes in the requirements and procedures regarding public access to City records and meetings provided in the Sunshine Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97156, "no_votes": 69086, "total_votes": 166242, "percent_yes": 58.44251151935131, "percent_no": 41.55748848064869, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.739851", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.075708", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City make changes in the requirements and procedures regarding public access to City records and meetings provided in the Sunshine Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10364, "fingerprint": "1999|199900146|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900146|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "103e18f2a6237806", "measure_id": "199900146", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City pursue extending Caltrain from the Fourth and Townsend Streets station to a new or rebuilt station on the site of the Transbay Terminal, as well as other improvements in Caltrain facilities and services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 123623, "no_votes": 54751, "total_votes": 178374, "percent_yes": 69.30550416540527, "percent_no": 30.694495834594733, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.740118", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.075887", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City pursue extending Caltrain from the Fourth and Townsend Streets station to a new or rebuilt station on the site of the Transbay Terminal, as well as other improvements in Caltrain facilities and services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10365, "fingerprint": "1999|199900147|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900147|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d83bd429aa1a2869", "measure_id": "199900147", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City use the proceeds from any sale of excess Central Freeway right-of-way property to fund the Octavia Boulevard Plan and related transportation improvements, support construction of Housing and mixed uses on the right-of-way property, and prohibit widening of the existing elevated freeway structure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97386, "no_votes": 81823, "total_votes": 179209, "percent_yes": 54.34213683464558, "percent_no": 45.65786316535442, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.740386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.076071", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City use the proceeds from any sale of excess Central Freeway right-of-way property to fund the Octavia Boulevard Plan and related transportation improvements, support construction of Housing and mixed uses on the right-of-way property, and prohibit widening of the existing elevated freeway structure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10366, "fingerprint": "1999|199900148|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900148|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "bfaa750ea6665e39", "measure_id": "199900148", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City repeal 1998's Proposition E and authorize Caltrans to retrofit and widen the lower deck of the Central Freeway to provide a four-lane, single deck structure over Market Street from South Van Ness Avenue to Oak and Fell streets, and prepare an annual transit plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 86236, "no_votes": 95831, "total_votes": 182067, "percent_yes": 47.36498102346938, "percent_no": 52.63501897653062, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.740747", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.076255", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City repeal 1998's Proposition E and authorize Caltrans to retrofit and widen the lower deck of the Central Freeway to provide a four-lane, single deck structure over Market Street from South Van Ness Avenue to Oak and Fell streets, and prepare an annual transit plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10367, "fingerprint": "1999|199900149|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900149|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "581797fe3e477534", "measure_id": "199900149", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City set voluntary spending limits for candidates running for the Board of Supervisors by district at $75,000 for the general election and $20,000 for a run-off election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140882, "no_votes": 35655, "total_votes": 176537, "percent_yes": 79.80310076641157, "percent_no": 20.196899233588425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.741016", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.076436", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City set voluntary spending limits for candidates running for the Board of Supervisors by district at $75,000 for the general election and $20,000 for a run-off election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10370, "fingerprint": "1999|199900067|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900067|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "bab1d798dac3f3bb", "measure_id": "199900067", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce student overcrowding, build a second comprehensive high school, provide students with access to classroom computer and science technology, build permanent classrooms and facilities, upgrade and repair schools throughout the District and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall Galt Joint Union High School District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 234, "no_votes": 225, "total_votes": 459, "percent_yes": 50.98039215686274, "percent_no": 49.01960784313726, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.741824", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.077000", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce student overcrowding, build a second comprehensive high school, provide students with access to classroom computer and science technology, build permanent classrooms and facilities, upgrade and repair schools throughout the District and make the District eligible to receive State matching funds, shall Galt Joint Union High School District issue $30 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10369, "fingerprint": "1999|199900066|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900066|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "2619c1536cef849a", "measure_id": "199900066", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable the Galt Elementary School District to acquire and construct a new middle school and a new elementary school on sites already owned by the District, and to acquire and construct other necessary student facilities, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $7 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum set by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 95, "no_votes": 63, "total_votes": 158, "percent_yes": 60.12658227848101, "percent_no": 39.87341772151899, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.741550", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.076814", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable the Galt Elementary School District to acquire and construct a new middle school and a new elementary school on sites already owned by the District, and to acquire and construct other necessary student facilities, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $7 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum set by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10368, "fingerprint": "1999|199900058|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900058|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "7061fb3fd2140414", "measure_id": "199900058", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide classroom, gym and community meeting rooms, shall the Oak View Union Elementary School District, construct school facilities, including two new classrooms and a multi-purpose room at the Oak View Union Elementary School by issuing $1,825,000 million of bonds, at an interest rate witting the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 218, "no_votes": 118, "total_votes": 336, "percent_yes": 64.88095238095238, "percent_no": 35.11904761904762, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-20", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.741282", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.076620", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide classroom, gym and community meeting rooms, shall the Oak View Union Elementary School District, construct school facilities, including two new classrooms and a multi-purpose room at the Oak View Union Elementary School by issuing $1,825,000 million of bonds, at an interest rate witting the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10371, "fingerprint": "1999|199900083|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900083|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "199900083", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1967, "no_votes": 1812, "total_votes": 3779, "percent_yes": 52.05080709182324, "percent_no": 47.94919290817676, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.742157", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.077183", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10372, "fingerprint": "1999|199900084|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900084|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "199900084", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1911, "no_votes": 1827, "total_votes": 3738, "percent_yes": 51.12359550561798, "percent_no": 48.87640449438202, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.742426", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.077362", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10373, "fingerprint": "1999|199900117|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900117|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "8c1be33d750e1155", "measure_id": "199900117", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide classroom, gym, and community meeting rooms, shall the Oak View Union Elementary School District, construct school facilities, including two new classrooms and a multipurpose room at the Oak View Union Elementary School by issuing $1,825,000 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 275, "no_votes": 158, "total_votes": 433, "percent_yes": 63.51039260969977, "percent_no": 36.48960739030023, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.742694", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.077544", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide classroom, gym, and community meeting rooms, shall the Oak View Union Elementary School District, construct school facilities, including two new classrooms and a multipurpose room at the Oak View Union Elementary School by issuing $1,825,000 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10374, "fingerprint": "1999|199900126|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900126|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "571d43e9b6a5f3ed", "measure_id": "199900126", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide students with a greater opportunity to attend neighborhood schools on a traditional or modified traditional calendar; construct new schools and necessary additions to existing schools; renovate existing classrooms; reduce classroom overcrowding; to improve classroom security, school safety and school communications and to give students greater access to classroom computer technology, shall the Lodi Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $122 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11400, "no_votes": 17770, "total_votes": 29170, "percent_yes": 39.08124785738773, "percent_no": 60.91875214261227, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-28", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.742966", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.077728", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide students with a greater opportunity to attend neighborhood schools on a traditional or modified traditional calendar; construct new schools and necessary additions to existing schools; renovate existing classrooms; reduce classroom overcrowding; to improve classroom security, school safety and school communications and to give students greater access to classroom computer technology, shall the Lodi Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $122 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10375, "fingerprint": "1999|199900045|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900045|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "c86223e88a7cd5d4", "measure_id": "199900045", "measure_letter": "A-99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding by constructing three elementary schools, one middle school, and one high school; install educational technology; remodel Georgia Brown and Bauer/Speck elementary schools; expand Pat Butler, Virginia Peterson, Lewis Middle and Paso Robles and Liberty High Schools; and to acquire and improve school sites, shall the Paso Robles Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds of School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 in the principal amount of $65,000,000 bearing interest at rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3094, "no_votes": 1794, "total_votes": 4888, "percent_yes": 63.297872340425535, "percent_no": 36.702127659574465, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.743285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.077923", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding by constructing three elementary schools, one middle school, and one high school; install educational technology; remodel Georgia Brown and Bauer/Speck elementary schools; expand Pat Butler, Virginia Peterson, Lewis Middle and Paso Robles and Liberty High Schools; and to acquire and improve school sites, shall the Paso Robles Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds of School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 in the principal amount of $65,000,000 bearing interest at rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10381, "fingerprint": "1999|199900259|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900259|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "a417be2bf3d5131d", "measure_id": "199900259", "measure_letter": "D-99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Paso Robles Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue general obligation bonds of School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 in the principal amount of $65,000,000 bearing interest at rates within the legal limit to:  Build three elementary schools; Build a third middle school; Renovate Flamson Middle School; Renovate Georgia Brown School's Kindergarten; Remodel Glen Speck School's Multi Purpose Room; Provide school safety devices; Improve Paso Robles High School; Expand Liberty High School; Acquire school sites.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3914, "no_votes": 3110, "total_votes": 7024, "percent_yes": 55.72323462414579, "percent_no": 44.27676537585421, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.745045", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.079031", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Paso Robles Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue general obligation bonds of School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 in the principal amount of $65,000,000 bearing interest at rates within the legal limit to:  Build three elementary schools; Build a third middle school; Renovate Flamson Middle School; Renovate Georgia Brown School's Kindergarten; Remodel Glen Speck School's Multi Purpose Room; Provide school safety devices; Improve Paso Robles High School; Expand Liberty High School; Acquire school sites.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10382, "fingerprint": "1999|199900260|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900260|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "cac21b544a348a90", "measure_id": "199900260", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable the San Miguel Joint Union Elementary School District to finance the costs of acquiring and constructing a new elementary school in the Heritage Ranch area, a gymnasium at Larsen Elementary School, and other school Improvements, including to obtain release of a $1,646,431 State grant committed to the new school, and $764,754 of State grants for Larsen Elementary School, shall the District issue $3,850,000 of bonds bearing interest at lawful rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 592, "no_votes": 249, "total_votes": 841, "percent_yes": 70.3923900118906, "percent_no": 29.607609988109402, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.745397", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.079213", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable the San Miguel Joint Union Elementary School District to finance the costs of acquiring and constructing a new elementary school in the Heritage Ranch area, a gymnasium at Larsen Elementary School, and other school Improvements, including to obtain release of a $1,646,431 State grant committed to the new school, and $764,754 of State grants for Larsen Elementary School, shall the District issue $3,850,000 of bonds bearing interest at lawful rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10380, "fingerprint": "1999|199900154|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900154|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "d82ff8f895f454f0", "measure_id": "199900154", "measure_letter": "F-99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000/2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within Marlborough Lane Road Improvement Zone of County Service Area No. 21, to provide road improvements within said Zone, with the Special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Sixteen Dollars ($16.00) per front foot of improvement per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 6, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.744693", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.078836", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000/2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within Marlborough Lane Road Improvement Zone of County Service Area No. 21, to provide road improvements within said Zone, with the Special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Sixteen Dollars ($16.00) per front foot of improvement per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10378, "fingerprint": "1999|199900152|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900152|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "e4f4fbbcb29b913c", "measure_id": "199900152", "measure_letter": "G-99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000/2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within Jean Street Road Improvement Zone of County Service Area No. 21, to provide road improvements within said Zone, with the Special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Sixteen Dollars ($16.00) per front foot of improvement per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 2, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.744163", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.078469", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000/2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within Jean Street Road Improvement Zone of County Service Area No. 21, to provide road improvements within said Zone, with the Special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Sixteen Dollars ($16.00) per front foot of improvement per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10377, "fingerprint": "1999|199900151|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900151|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "f34eece16188ece1", "measure_id": "199900151", "measure_letter": "H-99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000/2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within Harvey Street Road Improvement Zone of County Service Area No. 21, to provide road improvements within said Zone, with the Special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Sixteen Dollars ($16.00) per front foot of improvement per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 9, "percent_yes": 88.88888888888889, "percent_no": 11.111111111111114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.743893", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.078288", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000/2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within Harvey Street Road Improvement Zone of County Service Area No. 21, to provide road improvements within said Zone, with the Special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Sixteen Dollars ($16.00) per front foot of improvement per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10379, "fingerprint": "1999|199900153|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900153|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "806408113eba4c3e", "measure_id": "199900153", "measure_letter": "I-99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000/2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within London Lane Road Improvement Zone of County Service Area No. 21, to provide road improvements within said Zone, with the Special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Sixteen Dollars ($16.00) per front foot of improvement per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9, "no_votes": 1, "total_votes": 10, "percent_yes": 90.0, "percent_no": 10.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.744430", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.078650", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000/2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within London Lane Road Improvement Zone of County Service Area No. 21, to provide road improvements within said Zone, with the Special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Sixteen Dollars ($16.00) per front foot of improvement per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10376, "fingerprint": "1999|199900150|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900150|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "f50a322e9d9fbc29", "measure_id": "199900150", "measure_letter": "J-99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000/2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within Ash Street Road Improvement Zone of County Service Area No. 21, to provide road improvements within said Zone, with the Special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Sixteen Dollars ($16.00) per front foot of improvement per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 15, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.743555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.078106", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of San Luis Obispo, commencing Fiscal Year 2000/2001, and annually thereafter, impose, levy and collect a special tax on real property within Ash Street Road Improvement Zone of County Service Area No. 21, to provide road improvements within said Zone, with the Special tax to be at an initial rate not exceeding Sixteen Dollars ($16.00) per front foot of improvement per parcel having a separate County Assessor's Parcel Number and increasing not more than two percent per year thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12188, "fingerprint": "1999|199900263|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900263|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "8f049d16ff716c8d", "measure_id": "199900263", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To prepare students at College of San Mateo, Canada College and Skyline College for 4-year colleges and jobs of the 21st century, shall the San Mateo County Community College District be authorized to issue bonds in $148 million principal amount to upgrade computer and science labs; repair leaky roofs; remove asbestos; make seismic upgrades; retrofit classrooms; improve disabled access; improve safety on campuses; and make other real property acquisitions and improvements, at interest rates not exceeding the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 56989, "no_votes": 29865, "total_votes": 86854, "percent_yes": 65.61470974278674, "percent_no": 34.385290257213256, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.355057", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.749568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.082224", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To prepare students at College of San Mateo, Canada College and Skyline College for 4-year colleges and jobs of the 21st century, shall the San Mateo County Community College District be authorized to issue bonds in $148 million principal amount to upgrade computer and science labs; repair leaky roofs; remove asbestos; make seismic upgrades; retrofit classrooms; improve disabled access; improve safety on campuses; and make other real property acquisitions and improvements, at interest rates not exceeding the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12185, "fingerprint": "1999|199900098|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900098|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "555ee50c1b5c4753", "measure_id": "199900098", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to upgrade and modernize facilities, and add classrooms to meet class size reduction goals, replace some portable classrooms with permanent classrooms, shall the Woodside Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in a principal amount not to exceed $5,200,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 836, "no_votes": 298, "total_votes": 1134, "percent_yes": 73.72134038800705, "percent_no": 26.27865961199295, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.352237", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.746826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.080189", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to upgrade and modernize facilities, and add classrooms to meet class size reduction goals, replace some portable classrooms with permanent classrooms, shall the Woodside Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in a principal amount not to exceed $5,200,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12184, "fingerprint": "1999|199900068|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900068|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "cd14d493e315d226", "measure_id": "199900068", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide adequate classroom space and rehabilitate existing schools, upgrade deteriorating plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms and upgrade school sites to comply with current fire and safety standards, shall the Las Lomitas Elementary School District issue $12 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1989, "no_votes": 294, "total_votes": 2283, "percent_yes": 87.1222076215506, "percent_no": 12.8777923784494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.351276", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.745952", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.079576", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate classroom space and rehabilitate existing schools, upgrade deteriorating plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms and upgrade school sites to comply with current fire and safety standards, shall the Las Lomitas Elementary School District issue $12 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10383, "fingerprint": "1999|199900046|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900046|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "c8b379db1913ee19", "measure_id": "199900046", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Brisbane Elementary School District be authorized to levy a special tax of not more than $72 annually per parcel to provide (1) music, art and reading teachers; and, if funds allow (2) lower class size and additional library and instructional resources; provided, however, that senior citizens be eligible for an exemption.  Shall the District's appropriations limit be raised from July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2005 in an amount equal to said tax for each year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 666, "no_votes": 333, "total_votes": 999, "percent_yes": 66.66666666666666, "percent_no": 33.33333333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.745666", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.079397", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Brisbane Elementary School District be authorized to levy a special tax of not more than $72 annually per parcel to provide (1) music, art and reading teachers; and, if funds allow (2) lower class size and additional library and instructional resources; provided, however, that senior citizens be eligible for an exemption.  Shall the District's appropriations limit be raised from July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2005 in an amount equal to said tax for each year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12187, "fingerprint": "1999|199900262|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900262|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "0dad863b649c2919", "measure_id": "199900262", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Reorganization of school districts to transfer a portion of the territory currently a part of the Laguna Salada Union Elementary School District and the Jefferson Union High School District to the San Bruno Park Elementary School District and the San Mateo Union High School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 869, "no_votes": 74, "total_votes": 943, "percent_yes": 92.15270413573704, "percent_no": 7.847295864262961, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.354785", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.749292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.082041", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Reorganization of school districts to transfer a portion of the territory currently a part of the Laguna Salada Union Elementary School District and the Jefferson Union High School District to the San Bruno Park Elementary School District and the San Mateo Union High School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10385, "fingerprint": "1999|199900073|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900073|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "5329ab559a451651", "measure_id": "199900073", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide adequate classrooms, repair and renovate high schools as recommended by Citizens' Advisory Committee as summarized, by financing repairs, improvements, acquisition of and additions to buildings and grounds, including improved science and computer labs, access to technology, upgraded libraries, classrooms, heating, plumbing, electrical and ventilation systems, shall San Mateo Union High School District be authorized to issue bonds not exceeding $190,000,000 principal amount, less any State Proposition 1A funds received, at interest rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14072, "no_votes": 10230, "total_votes": 24302, "percent_yes": 57.90469920171179, "percent_no": 42.09530079828821, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-05-11", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.746496", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.079981", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate classrooms, repair and renovate high schools as recommended by Citizens' Advisory Committee as summarized, by financing repairs, improvements, acquisition of and additions to buildings and grounds, including improved science and computer labs, access to technology, upgraded libraries, classrooms, heating, plumbing, electrical and ventilation systems, shall San Mateo Union High School District be authorized to issue bonds not exceeding $190,000,000 principal amount, less any State Proposition 1A funds received, at interest rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12186, "fingerprint": "1999|199900261|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900261|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "9b5cfb12c2b173c0", "measure_id": "199900261", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To impose reading, writing, math, and science programs provided to Cabrillo Unified School District students, shall the Cabrillo Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $125.00 on each parcel within the District, exempting individuals over 65, each year for four years, to be used for: reading and literacy assistance; class size reduction; science and technology equipment; counseling; music, physical education and technology; and increase its appropriations limit in an amount equal to said tax for each year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3380, "no_votes": 2657, "total_votes": 6037, "percent_yes": 55.98807354646348, "percent_no": 44.01192645353652, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.354526", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.749012", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.081859", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To impose reading, writing, math, and science programs provided to Cabrillo Unified School District students, shall the Cabrillo Unified School District be authorized to levy a special tax of $125.00 on each parcel within the District, exempting individuals over 65, each year for four years, to be used for: reading and literacy assistance; class size reduction; science and technology equipment; counseling; music, physical education and technology; and increase its appropriations limit in an amount equal to said tax for each year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10384, "fingerprint": "1999|199900072|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900072|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a7750b9022cb6d53", "measure_id": "199900072", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing construction at Navy site and surrounding area (El Camino Real, I-380, Sneath Lane and Cherry Avenue) of a mixed-use Planned Development with hotel of 500 rooms minimum and related structures, plus possible additional uses, including senior housing, with structures not exceeding 165 feet and parking structures not exceeding 60 feet, subject to City's development approval process?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1845, "no_votes": 2087, "total_votes": 3932, "percent_yes": 46.92268565615463, "percent_no": 53.07731434384537, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-05-11", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.746225", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.079784", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing construction at Navy site and surrounding area (El Camino Real, I-380, Sneath Lane and Cherry Avenue) of a mixed-use Planned Development with hotel of 500 rooms minimum and related structures, plus possible additional uses, including senior housing, with structures not exceeding 165 feet and parking structures not exceeding 60 feet, subject to City's development approval process?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10388, "fingerprint": "1999|199900206|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900206|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ce43521e8469b818", "measure_id": "199900206", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance amending the Residential Growth Limitation Ordinance be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1943, "no_votes": 1126, "total_votes": 3069, "percent_yes": 63.31052460084719, "percent_no": 36.68947539915281, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.747638", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.080762", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance amending the Residential Growth Limitation Ordinance be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10387, "fingerprint": "1999|199900205|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900205|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "465be4ceb8696410", "measure_id": "199900205", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of Burlingame City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2229, "no_votes": 2454, "total_votes": 4683, "percent_yes": 47.5976937860346, "percent_no": 52.4023062139654, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.747373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.080559", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of Burlingame City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10392, "fingerprint": "1999|199900210|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900210|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "ba4628e839f508b9", "measure_id": "199900210", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Mateo be authorized to issue General Obligation Bonds in the amount of $35 million dollars principal ($35,000,000) to finance the construction, acquisition, and improvement of a new Main Library and the improvement of the City's branch libraries, and all costs incident thereto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9640, "no_votes": 3750, "total_votes": 13390, "percent_yes": 71.99402539208364, "percent_no": 28.005974607916357, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.748741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.081672", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Mateo be authorized to issue General Obligation Bonds in the amount of $35 million dollars principal ($35,000,000) to finance the construction, acquisition, and improvement of a new Main Library and the improvement of the City's branch libraries, and all costs incident thereto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10391, "fingerprint": "1999|199900209|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900209|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "41e4de4cb32a8217", "measure_id": "199900209", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance of the City of San Carlos, enacting a Parcel Tax of $6.00 per year for a period of ten years, with the proceeds dedicated exclusively to the long term capital improvement of City parks and park facilities be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4195, "no_votes": 1307, "total_votes": 5502, "percent_yes": 76.2450018175209, "percent_no": 23.7549981824791, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.748473", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.081486", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance of the City of San Carlos, enacting a Parcel Tax of $6.00 per year for a period of ten years, with the proceeds dedicated exclusively to the long term capital improvement of City parks and park facilities be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10386, "fingerprint": "1999|199900204|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900204|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "a0c4aba5d6dadfa1", "measure_id": "199900204", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance of the Town of Atherton Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax for Municipal Services and for the Expenditure of Funds Derived from Such Tax, and numbered 507 be adopted?\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 906, "no_votes": 877, "total_votes": 1783, "percent_yes": 50.813236118900726, "percent_no": 49.186763881099274, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.747104", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.080376", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance entitled \"An Ordinance of the Town of Atherton Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax for Municipal Services and for the Expenditure of Funds Derived from Such Tax, and numbered 507 be adopted?\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10389, "fingerprint": "1999|199900207|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900207|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "6ddea660df4017bc", "measure_id": "199900207", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted amending the San Bruno Municipal Code to increase business license taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3827, "no_votes": 2871, "total_votes": 6698, "percent_yes": 57.13645864437146, "percent_no": 42.86354135562854, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.747937", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.081030", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted amending the San Bruno Municipal Code to increase business license taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10390, "fingerprint": "1999|199900208|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900208|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "b89b2accb062a16d", "measure_id": "199900208", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted amending the San Bruno Municipal Code to add a provision imposing an airport parking facility tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4392, "no_votes": 2330, "total_votes": 6722, "percent_yes": 65.33769711395419, "percent_no": 34.66230288604581, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.748205", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.081254", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted amending the San Bruno Municipal Code to add a provision imposing an airport parking facility tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10393, "fingerprint": "1999|199900099|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900099|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "1e25f8e12782a5bf", "measure_id": "199900099", "measure_letter": "P99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize 30 year old classrooms, repair leaky roofs, replace outdated heating and plumbing, upgrade classroom electrical systems, increase student access to computer, and build new classrooms at existing schools, shall the Orcutt Union School District issue $15 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for repair of schools, construction of new classrooms and school facilities, and wiring of classrooms for computers and modem technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5279, "no_votes": 2103, "total_votes": 7382, "percent_yes": 71.51178542400433, "percent_no": 28.48821457599567, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.749842", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.082406", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize 30 year old classrooms, repair leaky roofs, replace outdated heating and plumbing, upgrade classroom electrical systems, increase student access to computer, and build new classrooms at existing schools, shall the Orcutt Union School District issue $15 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for repair of schools, construction of new classrooms and school facilities, and wiring of classrooms for computers and modem technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10394, "fingerprint": "1999|199900100|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900100|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "6b93906fc3edace3", "measure_id": "199900100", "measure_letter": "Q99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Santa Maria-Bonita School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $33 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law to build and acquire new schools and facilities, to renovate classrooms, and to provide site improvements, to enhance health, safety and instructional programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4210, "no_votes": 2333, "total_votes": 6543, "percent_yes": 64.3435732844261, "percent_no": 35.6564267155739, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.750114", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.082590", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Maria-Bonita School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $33 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law to build and acquire new schools and facilities, to renovate classrooms, and to provide site improvements, to enhance health, safety and instructional programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10395, "fingerprint": "1999|199900211|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900211|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "17302bf6e31de536", "measure_id": "199900211", "measure_letter": "R99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Santa Barbara incur general obligation bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of not to exceed $36,700,000 in order to provide funding for any or all of the following purposes:  to acquire property and construct thereon a Police Department Central Facility to replace the old police headquarters building, and refurbish and upgrade existing Fire Department building and facilities to meet present standards?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10010, "no_votes": 12166, "total_votes": 22176, "percent_yes": 45.13888888888889, "percent_no": 54.86111111111111, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.750467", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.082777", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Santa Barbara incur general obligation bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of not to exceed $36,700,000 in order to provide funding for any or all of the following purposes:  to acquire property and construct thereon a Police Department Central Facility to replace the old police headquarters building, and refurbish and upgrade existing Fire Department building and facilities to meet present standards?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10396, "fingerprint": "1999|199900212|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900212|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "9ce538a8b2ee6871", "measure_id": "199900212", "measure_letter": "S99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall amendments to City of Santa Barbara Charter, Zoning Ordinances, General Plan, and Coastal Plan that permit construction of a 225 room hotel at Calle Cesar Chavez and Cabrillo Boulevard and change height, setback, and parking standards without design, environmental, or discretionary review and approval by the Architectural Board of Review, Historic Landmarks Commission, Planning Commission, or City Council, and without growth limitation mitigation measures of Charter section 1508 (Measure E) be adopted?  (Parker Initiative)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7860, "no_votes": 14764, "total_votes": 22624, "percent_yes": 34.74186704384724, "percent_no": 65.25813295615276, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.750737", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.082961", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall amendments to City of Santa Barbara Charter, Zoning Ordinances, General Plan, and Coastal Plan that permit construction of a 225 room hotel at Calle Cesar Chavez and Cabrillo Boulevard and change height, setback, and parking standards without design, environmental, or discretionary review and approval by the Architectural Board of Review, Historic Landmarks Commission, Planning Commission, or City Council, and without growth limitation mitigation measures of Charter section 1508 (Measure E) be adopted?  (Parker Initiative)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10397, "fingerprint": "1999|199900264|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900264|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "d9bb4f33ef58cb5f", "measure_id": "199900264", "measure_letter": "T99", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Santa Barbara Community College District acquire and construct computer, multimedia and technology classrooms for vocational and career training; reduce classroom overcrowding; upgrade outdated science labs; refurbish and expand Adult Education learning facilities; repair deteriorating plumbing, heating and electrical systems; and make site and facility improvements for Santa Barbara City College to better serve south coast communities including Santa Barbara, Montecito, Carpenteria and Goleta, by issuing $44.8 million of bonds at legal interest rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22148, "no_votes": 18273, "total_votes": 40421, "percent_yes": 54.79330051211005, "percent_no": 45.20669948788995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.751006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.083148", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Santa Barbara Community College District acquire and construct computer, multimedia and technology classrooms for vocational and career training; reduce classroom overcrowding; upgrade outdated science labs; refurbish and expand Adult Education learning facilities; repair deteriorating plumbing, heating and electrical systems; and make site and facility improvements for Santa Barbara City College to better serve south coast communities including Santa Barbara, Montecito, Carpenteria and Goleta, by issuing $44.8 million of bonds at legal interest rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12189, "fingerprint": "1999|199900101|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900101|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "95b5724ce6a15069", "measure_id": "199900101", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Unification of Moreland School District.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2931, "no_votes": 3449, "total_votes": 6380, "percent_yes": 45.94043887147335, "percent_no": 54.05956112852665, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.357044", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.751595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.083516", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Unification of Moreland School District.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10398, "fingerprint": "1999|199900071|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900071|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "446cb1dc94ffd791", "measure_id": "199900071", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the East Side Union High School District in coordination with a citizens' oversight committee maintain the current tax rate and issue $80 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit, to repair and modernize each existing high school, repair leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing, heating, ventilation, cooling and electrical systems; rewire classrooms for computer technology; renovate, construct and acquire classrooms to comply with current safety standards and relieve over crowding; and construct a new high school?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13626, "no_votes": 2809, "total_votes": 16435, "percent_yes": 82.90842713720717, "percent_no": 17.09157286279283, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-05-04", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.751326", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.083330", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the East Side Union High School District in coordination with a citizens' oversight committee maintain the current tax rate and issue $80 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit, to repair and modernize each existing high school, repair leaky roofs, deteriorating plumbing, heating, ventilation, cooling and electrical systems; rewire classrooms for computer technology; renovate, construct and acquire classrooms to comply with current safety standards and relieve over crowding; and construct a new high school?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12190, "fingerprint": "1999|199900265|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900265|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a6faa52bee89cad3", "measure_id": "199900265", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood elementary and middle schools and sites, relieve classroom overcrowding, replace inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating systems, roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, and repair, construct and acquire classrooms, and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the Berryessa Elementary School District issue $48 million of bonds at legal interest rates, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4248, "no_votes": 1699, "total_votes": 5947, "percent_yes": 71.43097360013452, "percent_no": 28.56902639986548, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.359054", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.753573", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.084779", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood elementary and middle schools and sites, relieve classroom overcrowding, replace inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating systems, roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, and repair, construct and acquire classrooms, and obtain eligibility for state funding for construction and renovation, shall the Berryessa Elementary School District issue $48 million of bonds at legal interest rates, and appoint a citizens' oversight committee to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10399, "fingerprint": "1999|199900102|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900102|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "96acaa76ad986a69", "measure_id": "199900102", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to permit the Morgan Hill Unified School District to finance construction of a new high school, renovations to Live Oak High School, and construction of a new elementary school, shall the District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness for the acquisition and improvement of real property for authorized school purposes, in the principal amount of $72,500,000, to bear interest rates not exceeding the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5526, "no_votes": 2395, "total_votes": 7921, "percent_yes": 69.7639186971342, "percent_no": 30.2360813028658, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.751866", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.083697", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to permit the Morgan Hill Unified School District to finance construction of a new high school, renovations to Live Oak High School, and construction of a new elementary school, shall the District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness for the acquisition and improvement of real property for authorized school purposes, in the principal amount of $72,500,000, to bear interest rates not exceeding the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12191, "fingerprint": "1999|199900266|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900266|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0168b084bc9aa59d", "measure_id": "199900266", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair classrooms, modernize schools for computer learning, and acquire and improve school facilities, shall the Campbell Union High School District incur bonded indebtedness not to exceed $95,000,000 at legal interest rates for purposes including:  Modernizing aging electrical systems to support computers and learning technology in every classroom, and reduce safety hazards; Improving classrooms for teaching science and technology; Repairing old plumbing, restrooms, flooring, heating, water boilers, and leaky roofs; With expenditures reviewed by a community bond accountability committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13006, "no_votes": 6066, "total_votes": 19072, "percent_yes": 68.19421140939598, "percent_no": 31.805788590604024, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.359257", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.753857", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.084959", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair classrooms, modernize schools for computer learning, and acquire and improve school facilities, shall the Campbell Union High School District incur bonded indebtedness not to exceed $95,000,000 at legal interest rates for purposes including:  Modernizing aging electrical systems to support computers and learning technology in every classroom, and reduce safety hazards; Improving classrooms for teaching science and technology; Repairing old plumbing, restrooms, flooring, heating, water boilers, and leaky roofs; With expenditures reviewed by a community bond accountability committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10400, "fingerprint": "1999|199900103|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900103|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "fd07a3ee59b3035c", "measure_id": "199900103", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade neighborhood schools, improve student safety conditions and satisfy building code earthquake safety requirements, shall the Union Elementary School District, with annual audits and citizen oversight, renovate science labs and libraries, modernize and expand school facilities, acquire and construct classrooms, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate computers, install energy efficient ventilation systems, replace aging plumbing, repair leaky roofs and improve school sites by issuing $92 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3389, "no_votes": 845, "total_votes": 4234, "percent_yes": 80.04251299008031, "percent_no": 19.95748700991969, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.752216", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.083882", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade neighborhood schools, improve student safety conditions and satisfy building code earthquake safety requirements, shall the Union Elementary School District, with annual audits and citizen oversight, renovate science labs and libraries, modernize and expand school facilities, acquire and construct classrooms, upgrade electrical wiring to accommodate computers, install energy efficient ventilation systems, replace aging plumbing, repair leaky roofs and improve school sites by issuing $92 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10404, "fingerprint": "1999|199900216|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900216|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "51eec91526c9999a", "measure_id": "199900216", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1429, New Series, An Ordinance of the City of Morgan Hill, California, Approving and Adopting an Amendment to the Community Development Plan for the Ojo De Agua Community Development Project, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2686, "no_votes": 1304, "total_votes": 3990, "percent_yes": 67.31829573934837, "percent_no": 32.68170426065163, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.753305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.084600", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1429, New Series, An Ordinance of the City of Morgan Hill, California, Approving and Adopting an Amendment to the Community Development Plan for the Ojo De Agua Community Development Project, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10405, "fingerprint": "1999|199900267|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900267|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1ef06c45aa7eb996", "measure_id": "199900267", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to replace aging roofs, deteriorated plumbing and electrical systems; refurbish classrooms, science laboratories and restrooms, and construct science and high-tech computer labs, classrooms and school facilities, shall Foothill-De Anza Community College District repair and rehabilitate its Foothill College and De Anza College facilities to meet current health, safety, and instructional standards by issuing $248 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 35506, "no_votes": 13774, "total_votes": 49280, "percent_yes": 72.04951298701299, "percent_no": 27.95048701298701, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.754133", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.085141", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to replace aging roofs, deteriorated plumbing and electrical systems; refurbish classrooms, science laboratories and restrooms, and construct science and high-tech computer labs, classrooms and school facilities, shall Foothill-De Anza Community College District repair and rehabilitate its Foothill College and De Anza College facilities to meet current health, safety, and instructional standards by issuing $248 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10401, "fingerprint": "1999|199900213|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900213|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "80ae497a0a722d46", "measure_id": "199900213", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 99-370 of the City of Los Altos, providing for term limits for Los Altos City Councilmembers, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4019, "no_votes": 2993, "total_votes": 7012, "percent_yes": 57.31602966343411, "percent_no": 42.68397033656589, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.752495", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.084062", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 99-370 of the City of Los Altos, providing for term limits for Los Altos City Councilmembers, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10402, "fingerprint": "1999|199900214|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900214|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c80d9fe30b74da5f", "measure_id": "199900214", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "City of Los Altos voters request that utility tax increases above 3.5% be appropriated by City Council (with citizens' watchdog committee advice) for service improvements in:  MAINTENANCE- Critical deferred facility repairs and preventative maintenance; Crack-sealing, street maintenance; Street landscaping maintenance; RECREATION- Facility acquisition and construction; Park land acquisition; After-school youth program; PUBLIC SAFETY- Emergency (9-1-1) communications; Continue and expand traffic safety program; Traffic engineering assistance", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4019, "no_votes": 2993, "total_votes": 7012, "percent_yes": 57.31602966343411, "percent_no": 42.68397033656589, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.752762", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.084240", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "City of Los Altos voters request that utility tax increases above 3.5% be appropriated by City Council (with citizens' watchdog committee advice) for service improvements in:  MAINTENANCE- Critical deferred facility repairs and preventative maintenance; Crack-sealing, street maintenance; Street landscaping maintenance; RECREATION- Facility acquisition and construction; Park land acquisition; After-school youth program; PUBLIC SAFETY- Emergency (9-1-1) communications; Continue and expand traffic safety program; Traffic engineering assistance", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10403, "fingerprint": "1999|199900215|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900215|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "68fefaea3444e2b7", "measure_id": "199900215", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council of the City of Los Altos be authorized, annually, to set the rate of any utility users tax of the City at a rate not to exceed 6.25%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3255, "no_votes": 3443, "total_votes": 6698, "percent_yes": 48.59659599880561, "percent_no": 51.40340400119439, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.753038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.084422", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council of the City of Los Altos be authorized, annually, to set the rate of any utility users tax of the City at a rate not to exceed 6.25%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10406, "fingerprint": "1999|199900022|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900022|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "27bccb365059cc9f", "measure_id": "199900022", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended by repealing Chapter 6.85 and adding a new Chapter 6.85 prohibiting the use of City's water supply to deliver products or substances intended to affect the physical or mental functions of persons consuming such water?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4441, "no_votes": 4367, "total_votes": 8808, "percent_yes": 50.42007266121708, "percent_no": 49.57992733878292, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.754482", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.085321", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Cruz Municipal Code be amended by repealing Chapter 6.85 and adding a new Chapter 6.85 prohibiting the use of City's water supply to deliver products or substances intended to affect the physical or mental functions of persons consuming such water?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10407, "fingerprint": "1999|199900085|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900085|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "b6338eee3f2eb58b", "measure_id": "199900085", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 16-ZC-186 of the City of Scotts Valley approving the specific plan, rezoning, and the development agreement for the \"Glenwood Project\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1553, "no_votes": 2415, "total_votes": 3968, "percent_yes": 39.13810483870967, "percent_no": 60.86189516129033, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.754753", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.085505", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 16-ZC-186 of the City of Scotts Valley approving the specific plan, rezoning, and the development agreement for the \"Glenwood Project\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10408, "fingerprint": "1999|199900086|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900086|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ef8ce6a3a601ad8c", "measure_id": "199900086", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Resolution No. 1119.16 of the City of Scotts Valley approving an amendment to the General Plan for the \"Glenwood Project\" be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1526, "no_votes": 2424, "total_votes": 3950, "percent_yes": 38.63291139240506, "percent_no": 61.36708860759494, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.755024", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.085688", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Resolution No. 1119.16 of the City of Scotts Valley approving an amendment to the General Plan for the \"Glenwood Project\" be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12192, "fingerprint": "1999|199900217|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900217|SHASTA", "content_hash": "060eb57d5ee644bf", "measure_id": "199900217", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Shasta Lake base-year appropriation limit for fiscal year 1993/94 be established at $1,764,374?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5261, "no_votes": 1656, "total_votes": 6917, "percent_yes": 76.05898510915137, "percent_no": 23.941014890848635, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.361117", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.755564", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.086053", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Shasta Lake base-year appropriation limit for fiscal year 1993/94 be established at $1,764,374?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10409, "fingerprint": "1999|199900059|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900059|SHASTA", "content_hash": "fc7319f3648b46f8", "measure_id": "199900059", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Grant Elementary School District issue bonds to finance improvements and additions to existing school buildings and grounds such as playing fields, construction of classrooms, a science laboratory, a vocational/home education shop, a technology (computer/multi-media) instruction center, a music and performing arts area and a multi-purpose gymnasium/community use center in the amount of $2.5 million, the sum of which will bear interest rates not exceeding the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 338, "no_votes": 241, "total_votes": 579, "percent_yes": 58.37651122625216, "percent_no": 41.62348877374784, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-20", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.755296", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.085872", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Grant Elementary School District issue bonds to finance improvements and additions to existing school buildings and grounds such as playing fields, construction of classrooms, a science laboratory, a vocational/home education shop, a technology (computer/multi-media) instruction center, a music and performing arts area and a multi-purpose gymnasium/community use center in the amount of $2.5 million, the sum of which will bear interest rates not exceeding the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12193, "fingerprint": "1999|199900109|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900109|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "9690d5b69206eefb", "measure_id": "199900109", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Jim Gubetta be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 427, "no_votes": 245, "total_votes": 672, "percent_yes": 63.54166666666666, "percent_no": 36.45833333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-07-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.362006", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.756360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.086591", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Jim Gubetta be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10410, "fingerprint": "1999|199900107|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900107|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "34285e11011f1ba4", "measure_id": "199900107", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall LeeAnn Meigs be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 211, "no_votes": 31, "total_votes": 242, "percent_yes": 87.19008264462809, "percent_no": 12.809917355371908, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-07-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.755831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.086232", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall LeeAnn Meigs be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10411, "fingerprint": "1999|199900108|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900108|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "eb0902737442cd7f", "measure_id": "199900108", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Juel West be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 207, "no_votes": 33, "total_votes": 240, "percent_yes": 86.25, "percent_no": 13.75, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-07-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.756096", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.086411", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Juel West be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10412, "fingerprint": "1999|199900050|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900050|SOLANO", "content_hash": "24ba5186bf2fac95", "measure_id": "199900050", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall any new revenues received from a voter approved increase to the utility users tax be used to:  increase fire/paramedic personnel staffing to meet current fire safety standards; provide citywide access to paramedic services; open sixth fire station in order to meet the citywide five minute emergency response time required by the General Plan; and fund emergency vehicle and equipment needs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6610, "no_votes": 6502, "total_votes": 13112, "percent_yes": 50.41183648566199, "percent_no": 49.58816351433801, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-23", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.756657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.086776", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall any new revenues received from a voter approved increase to the utility users tax be used to:  increase fire/paramedic personnel staffing to meet current fire safety standards; provide citywide access to paramedic services; open sixth fire station in order to meet the citywide five minute emergency response time required by the General Plan; and fund emergency vehicle and equipment needs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10413, "fingerprint": "1999|199900051|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900051|SOLANO", "content_hash": "fa49ffa6363aef81", "measure_id": "199900051", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted modifying the utility users tax from the current rate of 2% to a rate of up to 4% to fund general city services, with the following mandatory restrictions:  Low income senior citizen and disabled person tax refund program; annual audit of new tax expenditures; establishment of an independent citizens watchdog committee to review expenditure of new taxes; and reduction of tax rate if property taxes taken away by state are returned?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4805, "no_votes": 8302, "total_votes": 13107, "percent_yes": 36.65980010681315, "percent_no": 63.34019989318685, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-23", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.757167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.086964", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted modifying the utility users tax from the current rate of 2% to a rate of up to 4% to fund general city services, with the following mandatory restrictions:  Low income senior citizen and disabled person tax refund program; annual audit of new tax expenditures; establishment of an independent citizens watchdog committee to review expenditure of new taxes; and reduction of tax rate if property taxes taken away by state are returned?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10414, "fingerprint": "1999|199900218|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900218|SOLANO", "content_hash": "5056804467b95d04", "measure_id": "199900218", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an initiative measure amending the Fairfield general plan, zoning ordinance and zoning map to regulate the development of land located outside the city limits but within a revised urban limit line and to require as a condition of residential development in such area the dedication of land for open space or agricultural uses in a defined greenbelt area, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1376, "no_votes": 11777, "total_votes": 13153, "percent_yes": 10.46149167490306, "percent_no": 89.53850832509694, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.757434", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.087148", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an initiative measure amending the Fairfield general plan, zoning ordinance and zoning map to regulate the development of land located outside the city limits but within a revised urban limit line and to require as a condition of residential development in such area the dedication of land for open space or agricultural uses in a defined greenbelt area, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12196, "fingerprint": "1999|199900268|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900268|SONOMA", "content_hash": "12de80e44160c63e", "measure_id": "199900268", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Twin Hills Union School District be authorized to finance renovation and improvements for health and safety at Apple Blossom and Twin Hills schools, including major repairs to leaking roofs and windows, aging plumbing, electrical, heating and ventilation systems and restrooms; replacing deteriorating portables with permanent classrooms, making road entrances safer, and for acquisition and improvement of real property for authorized school purposes, by issuing $4,000,000 of bonds bearing interest at rates within the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 908, "no_votes": 258, "total_votes": 1166, "percent_yes": 77.87307032590051, "percent_no": 22.126929674099486, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.363908", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.758513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.088261", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Twin Hills Union School District be authorized to finance renovation and improvements for health and safety at Apple Blossom and Twin Hills schools, including major repairs to leaking roofs and windows, aging plumbing, electrical, heating and ventilation systems and restrooms; replacing deteriorating portables with permanent classrooms, making road entrances safer, and for acquisition and improvement of real property for authorized school purposes, by issuing $4,000,000 of bonds bearing interest at rates within the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12195, "fingerprint": "1999|199900119|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900119|SONOMA", "content_hash": "d7800f698d99f3f9", "measure_id": "199900119", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the lease and sale of certain real property behind Mountain Cemetery owned by the City of Sonoma be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2670, "no_votes": 821, "total_votes": 3491, "percent_yes": 76.48238327126897, "percent_no": 23.517616728731028, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-09-21", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.363647", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.758240", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.087932", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the lease and sale of certain real property behind Mountain Cemetery owned by the City of Sonoma be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12194, "fingerprint": "1999|199900104|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900104|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c40a86a0a31a2b6c", "measure_id": "199900104", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide adequate classroom space and rehabilitate and expand existing schools by financing major repairs, improvements, renovations and acquisitions of buildings and grounds, including for such purposes as new libraries, updated science laboratories, improved student access to technology, upgraded heating, electrical and plumbing systems, and to replace aging portables with new classrooms, shall the Cloverdale Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 at interest rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 988, "no_votes": 350, "total_votes": 1338, "percent_yes": 73.84155455904335, "percent_no": 26.158445440956655, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.363372", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.757971", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.087602", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate classroom space and rehabilitate and expand existing schools by financing major repairs, improvements, renovations and acquisitions of buildings and grounds, including for such purposes as new libraries, updated science laboratories, improved student access to technology, upgraded heating, electrical and plumbing systems, and to replace aging portables with new classrooms, shall the Cloverdale Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 at interest rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10415, "fingerprint": "1999|199900047|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900047|SONOMA", "content_hash": "23bba7d9d8a0d9b9", "measure_id": "199900047", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Liberty School District provide funds to continue supplemental reading, music, band, and additional quality educational programs for the District's children, and for financing new classrooms, by levying a special assessment on each assessor's parcel of $49.00 per year, with a 2.5% annual adjustment during the assessment period, for nine years, beginning July 1, 1999, with senior citizen and other exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 294, "no_votes": 86, "total_votes": 380, "percent_yes": 77.36842105263158, "percent_no": 22.631578947368425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.757702", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.087329", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Liberty School District provide funds to continue supplemental reading, music, band, and additional quality educational programs for the District's children, and for financing new classrooms, by levying a special assessment on each assessor's parcel of $49.00 per year, with a 2.5% annual adjustment during the assessment period, for nine years, beginning July 1, 1999, with senior citizen and other exemptions as set forth in the Resolution and Order of Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10416, "fingerprint": "1999|199900079|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900079|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "3b7f0223e728d479", "measure_id": "199900079", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance, identical to the one previously adopted by the voters in 1995, authorizing a limited transaction and use tax of one-eighth of one percent for a period not more than five years commencing on July 1, 2000, exclusively for maintaining county-wide library hours, purchase of books, maintain story-times, children and teen programs, access technology, telephone reference and other programs be enacted so that the current tax can be extended until June 30, 2005?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25872, "no_votes": 6034, "total_votes": 31906, "percent_yes": 81.08819657744625, "percent_no": 18.911803422553746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.758779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.088457", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance, identical to the one previously adopted by the voters in 1995, authorizing a limited transaction and use tax of one-eighth of one percent for a period not more than five years commencing on July 1, 2000, exclusively for maintaining county-wide library hours, purchase of books, maintain story-times, children and teen programs, access technology, telephone reference and other programs be enacted so that the current tax can be extended until June 30, 2005?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10417, "fingerprint": "1999|199900219|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900219|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "1ada3d610a7f46f2", "measure_id": "199900219", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the area of Modesto Urban Area General Plan, provided the area is first annexed to the City, which is described in the Sample Ballot as set forth in Measure F?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12508, "no_votes": 9518, "total_votes": 22026, "percent_yes": 56.78743303368746, "percent_no": 43.21256696631254, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.759049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.088644", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the area of Modesto Urban Area General Plan, provided the area is first annexed to the City, which is described in the Sample Ballot as set forth in Measure F?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10418, "fingerprint": "1999|199900220|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900220|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "12d888b38d6a9141", "measure_id": "199900220", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council Provide sewer service to the area of Modesto Urban Area General Plan, provided the area is first annexed to the City, which is described in the Sample Ballot as set forth in Measure G?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12119, "no_votes": 9547, "total_votes": 21666, "percent_yes": 55.935567248223016, "percent_no": 44.064432751776984, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.759316", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.088832", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council Provide sewer service to the area of Modesto Urban Area General Plan, provided the area is first annexed to the City, which is described in the Sample Ballot as set forth in Measure G?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10419, "fingerprint": "1999|199900221|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900221|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "a17998ebfa27f9d1", "measure_id": "199900221", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to eliminate the restriction on spending more than 5% of the City's property tax revenue in any one year for music, publicity and promotion?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7773, "no_votes": 14529, "total_votes": 22302, "percent_yes": 34.8533763788001, "percent_no": 65.1466236211999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.759645", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.089019", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to eliminate the restriction on spending more than 5% of the City's property tax revenue in any one year for music, publicity and promotion?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10420, "fingerprint": "1999|199900222|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900222|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "b63797afce5ee156", "measure_id": "199900222", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to change the date of any run-off election from the second to the third Tuesday in December and to further provide that, in the case of a run-off election a Councilmember so elected would hold office from the first Tuesday of the following January?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10453, "no_votes": 11199, "total_votes": 21652, "percent_yes": 48.27729539996305, "percent_no": 51.72270460003695, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.759913", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.089348", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to change the date of any run-off election from the second to the third Tuesday in December and to further provide that, in the case of a run-off election a Councilmember so elected would hold office from the first Tuesday of the following January?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10421, "fingerprint": "1999|199900223|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900223|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "de66557da7cf8eee", "measure_id": "199900223", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Modesto City Charter be amended to change the current Charter provisions for the selection of Vice Mayor which typically results in the selection of the most recently elected Councilmember and, instead, provide that the City Council would annually elect one of its members, other than the Mayor, to serve as Vice Mayor during the ensuing calendar year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13872, "no_votes": 7990, "total_votes": 21862, "percent_yes": 63.45256609642301, "percent_no": 36.54743390357699, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.760180", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.089534", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Modesto City Charter be amended to change the current Charter provisions for the selection of Vice Mayor which typically results in the selection of the most recently elected Councilmember and, instead, provide that the City Council would annually elect one of its members, other than the Mayor, to serve as Vice Mayor during the ensuing calendar year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10422, "fingerprint": "1999|199900224|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900224|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "4fcca4d6c59ddd8c", "measure_id": "199900224", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to provide that monthly compensation for the Mayor be $400.00 in addition to the monthly compensation received by councilmembers and that compensation for Vice Mayor be $150.00 in addition to the monthly compensation received by Councilmembers; and in addition, provide for medical, dental and vision insurance coverage for each member of the council in amount no greater in value than that provided for nonsafety, unrepresented management employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7188, "no_votes": 15211, "total_votes": 22399, "percent_yes": 32.09071833563998, "percent_no": 67.90928166436002, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.760446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.089722", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to provide that monthly compensation for the Mayor be $400.00 in addition to the monthly compensation received by councilmembers and that compensation for Vice Mayor be $150.00 in addition to the monthly compensation received by Councilmembers; and in addition, provide for medical, dental and vision insurance coverage for each member of the council in amount no greater in value than that provided for nonsafety, unrepresented management employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10423, "fingerprint": "1999|199900225|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900225|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "fa0271d747e65976", "measure_id": "199900225", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to allow the City Council to establish by resolution more at-will positions and clarify that all hourly employees are in the unclassified service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8793, "no_votes": 12294, "total_votes": 21087, "percent_yes": 41.69867690994451, "percent_no": 58.30132309005549, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.760709", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.089908", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to allow the City Council to establish by resolution more at-will positions and clarify that all hourly employees are in the unclassified service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10424, "fingerprint": "1999|199900226|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900226|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "2d9172363bce5604", "measure_id": "199900226", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to specifically authorize the City Manager to propose, and the City Council to adopt, a multi-year budget?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9274, "no_votes": 12174, "total_votes": 21448, "percent_yes": 43.23946288698247, "percent_no": 56.76053711301753, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.761262", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.090092", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to specifically authorize the City Manager to propose, and the City Council to adopt, a multi-year budget?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10425, "fingerprint": "1999|199900227|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900227|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "64cc74db8eda37c2", "measure_id": "199900227", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to provide that any park or park playground project otherwise subject to public bidding be exempt from the public bidding requirement in the event it involved any donated labor and/or material?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12099, "no_votes": 9403, "total_votes": 21502, "percent_yes": 56.26918426192913, "percent_no": 43.73081573807087, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.761567", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.090271", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to provide that any park or park playground project otherwise subject to public bidding be exempt from the public bidding requirement in the event it involved any donated labor and/or material?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10426, "fingerprint": "1999|199900228|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900228|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "f7e0cb0773d5adff", "measure_id": "199900228", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to eliminate any reference to the Board of Personnel Appeals?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10339, "no_votes": 10630, "total_votes": 20969, "percent_yes": 49.30611855596357, "percent_no": 50.69388144403643, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.761854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.090468", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Modesto City Charter be amended to eliminate any reference to the Board of Personnel Appeals?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10428, "fingerprint": "1999|199900269|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900269|SUTTER", "content_hash": "b9915119df08406a", "measure_id": "199900269", "measure_letter": "SS", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To fund school facilities for students in the Yuba City Unified School District, shall SFID No. 99-1 be authorized to issue bonds to provide for a new high school, two new elementary schools and modernization improvements at school sites in the amount of $30,648,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit?  This measure will authorize a tax sufficient for interest on, and redemption of, the bonds.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8572, "no_votes": 1870, "total_votes": 10442, "percent_yes": 82.0915533422716, "percent_no": 17.908446657728405, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.762404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.090837", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To fund school facilities for students in the Yuba City Unified School District, shall SFID No. 99-1 be authorized to issue bonds to provide for a new high school, two new elementary schools and modernization improvements at school sites in the amount of $30,648,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit?  This measure will authorize a tax sufficient for interest on, and redemption of, the bonds.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10427, "fingerprint": "1999|199900155|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900155|SUTTER", "content_hash": "eab4769c7bd0954e", "measure_id": "199900155", "measure_letter": "TT", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should Sutter Community Services District exercise the following powers in addition to providing water service:  the collection, treatment or disposal of sewage waste of the district and its inhabitants; public recreation for the district's inhabitants; and street lighting within the district.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143, "no_votes": 285, "total_votes": 428, "percent_yes": 33.41121495327103, "percent_no": 66.58878504672897, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.762130", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.090652", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Sutter Community Services District exercise the following powers in addition to providing water service:  the collection, treatment or disposal of sewage waste of the district and its inhabitants; public recreation for the district's inhabitants; and street lighting within the district.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10429, "fingerprint": "1999|199900156|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900156|TRINITY", "content_hash": "96329d8e4be10e7e", "measure_id": "199900156", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To advise the Board of Supervisors that any new sales tax revenues should be spent only on the crime prevention and fire prevention purposes as stated in the text of Measure S.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1658, "no_votes": 1421, "total_votes": 3079, "percent_yes": 53.84865215979215, "percent_no": 46.15134784020785, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.762673", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.091015", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To advise the Board of Supervisors that any new sales tax revenues should be spent only on the crime prevention and fire prevention purposes as stated in the text of Measure S.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10430, "fingerprint": "1999|199900157|TRINITY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900157|TRINITY", "content_hash": "f397313001811fa0", "measure_id": "199900157", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Trinity", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To authorize a one percent sales tax within the County of Triniity to be used for general county purposes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1013, "no_votes": 2086, "total_votes": 3099, "percent_yes": 32.68796385930945, "percent_no": 67.31203614069055, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.762949", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.091196", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To authorize a one percent sales tax within the County of Triniity to be used for general county purposes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Trinity_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10431, "fingerprint": "1999|199900005|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900005|TULARE", "content_hash": "fe3b18fb3c52dbf7", "measure_id": "199900005", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall La Verne Lamb be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 323, "no_votes": 439, "total_votes": 762, "percent_yes": 42.38845144356955, "percent_no": 57.61154855643045, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-01-12", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.763232", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.091377", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall La Verne Lamb be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10432, "fingerprint": "1999|199900006|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900006|TULARE", "content_hash": "8d5e2fe67bae4702", "measure_id": "199900006", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Alan Vanderlice be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 339, "no_votes": 430, "total_votes": 769, "percent_yes": 44.083224967490246, "percent_no": 55.916775032509754, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-01-12", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.763584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.091559", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Alan Vanderlice be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10433, "fingerprint": "1999|199900007|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900007|TULARE", "content_hash": "7468348c5272faa4", "measure_id": "199900007", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall John Vasquez be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 328, "no_votes": 436, "total_votes": 764, "percent_yes": 42.93193717277487, "percent_no": 57.06806282722513, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-01-12", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.763855", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.091747", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall John Vasquez be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10434, "fingerprint": "1999|199900008|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900008|TULARE", "content_hash": "895d633d4649a8be", "measure_id": "199900008", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Don Mason be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 326, "no_votes": 449, "total_votes": 775, "percent_yes": 42.064516129032256, "percent_no": 57.935483870967744, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-01-12", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.764120", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.091930", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Don Mason be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10435, "fingerprint": "1999|199900048|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900048|TULARE", "content_hash": "53784df10bc1905f", "measure_id": "199900048", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade its existing schools, provide science and computer labs, a library/ media center, and administration/student services building, 10 classrooms to relieve overcrowding, additional restrooms, and to provide improved access to modern computer technology at Exeter High, to add a cafeteria to Kaweah High, shall the Exeter Union High School District issue $4.5 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit with all money being spent for facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 989, "no_votes": 540, "total_votes": 1529, "percent_yes": 64.68279921517332, "percent_no": 35.31720078482668, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-03-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.764383", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.092111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade its existing schools, provide science and computer labs, a library/ media center, and administration/student services building, 10 classrooms to relieve overcrowding, additional restrooms, and to provide improved access to modern computer technology at Exeter High, to add a cafeteria to Kaweah High, shall the Exeter Union High School District issue $4.5 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit with all money being spent for facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10436, "fingerprint": "1999|199900069|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900069|TULARE", "content_hash": "8497961312fed5d7", "measure_id": "199900069", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Visalia Unified School District issue $42.5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit to construct and acquire new classrooms and school buildings to reduce overcrowding, to purchase and to modernize facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8898, "no_votes": 4188, "total_votes": 13086, "percent_yes": 67.99633195781752, "percent_no": 32.00366804218248, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-04-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.764648", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.092291", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Visalia Unified School District issue $42.5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit to construct and acquire new classrooms and school buildings to reduce overcrowding, to purchase and to modernize facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10437, "fingerprint": "1999|199900270|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900270|TULARE", "content_hash": "0ca30460108619d9", "measure_id": "199900270", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Given that historically and currently the K-8 grade jurisdiction students in the area which is being proposed to be transferred to the Linns Valley-Poso Flat Union Elementary School District are attending the Linns Valley-Poso Flat Union Elementary School District on inter-district agreement, shall this area of the Hot Springs Elementary School District attendance area be transferred to the Linns Valley-Poso Flat Union Elementary School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53, "no_votes": 5, "total_votes": 58, "percent_yes": 91.3793103448276, "percent_no": 8.620689655172399, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.764922", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.092470", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Given that historically and currently the K-8 grade jurisdiction students in the area which is being proposed to be transferred to the Linns Valley-Poso Flat Union Elementary School District are attending the Linns Valley-Poso Flat Union Elementary School District on inter-district agreement, shall this area of the Hot Springs Elementary School District attendance area be transferred to the Linns Valley-Poso Flat Union Elementary School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10438, "fingerprint": "1999|199900271|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900271|TULARE", "content_hash": "42eb22da0dfc8078", "measure_id": "199900271", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade its existing schools, (two music rooms, one computer/business centers, 2 regular classrooms, a gymnasium, a science lab complex and six relocatable classrooms) shall Lindsay Unified School District issue  $4.9 million on bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit with all money being spent for facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 588, "no_votes": 315, "total_votes": 903, "percent_yes": 65.11627906976744, "percent_no": 34.883720930232556, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.765191", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.092659", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade its existing schools, (two music rooms, one computer/business centers, 2 regular classrooms, a gymnasium, a science lab complex and six relocatable classrooms) shall Lindsay Unified School District issue  $4.9 million on bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit with all money being spent for facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10439, "fingerprint": "1999|199900158|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900158|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "b7e79ea4f9f31e70", "measure_id": "199900158", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall there be imposed a special tax for park and recreation improvements on each parcel within the District in the amount of Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) per parcel per year for each year beginning July 1, 2000 and continuing through June 30, 2015?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 276, "no_votes": 142, "total_votes": 418, "percent_yes": 66.02870813397129, "percent_no": 33.97129186602871, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.765516", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.092848", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be imposed a special tax for park and recreation improvements on each parcel within the District in the amount of Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) per parcel per year for each year beginning July 1, 2000 and continuing through June 30, 2015?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10442, "fingerprint": "1999|199900087|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900087|VENTURA", "content_hash": "5560ab348ecd3db4", "measure_id": "199900087", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "A REFERENDUM ON CITY ORDINANCE NO. 98-23 APPROVING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE MIDTOWN CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.  Shall Ordinance No. 98-23 approving a Redevelopment Plan for the Midtown Corridor Redevelopment Project be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5773, "no_votes": 7697, "total_votes": 13470, "percent_yes": 42.85820341499629, "percent_no": 57.14179658500371, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-06-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.766324", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.093403", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "A REFERENDUM ON CITY ORDINANCE NO. 98-23 APPROVING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE MIDTOWN CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.  Shall Ordinance No. 98-23 approving a Redevelopment Plan for the Midtown Corridor Redevelopment Project be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10444, "fingerprint": "1999|199900272|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900272|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e2420f46bb0ed6eb", "measure_id": "199900272", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair, rebuild and modernize schools an classrooms including replacing broken plumbing, repairing inadequate electrical systems, expanding parking drop-off areas for improved student safety codes, shall Briggs School District issue $2.5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 249, "no_votes": 114, "total_votes": 363, "percent_yes": 68.59504132231406, "percent_no": 31.40495867768594, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.766939", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.093770", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair, rebuild and modernize schools an classrooms including replacing broken plumbing, repairing inadequate electrical systems, expanding parking drop-off areas for improved student safety codes, shall Briggs School District issue $2.5 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10443, "fingerprint": "1999|199900229|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900229|VENTURA", "content_hash": "8c6ce4878b8cbb15", "measure_id": "199900229", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "AN INITIATIVE MEASURE RELATING TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MONTAGOMERY AVE. AND NORTH BANK DR.  The people of the City of San Buenaventura do ordain as follows:  A. That the City General Plan be amended to change the designated use of the 25.59 acre property owned by the First Assembly of God Church and located at the northwest corner of Montgomery Ave. and North Bank Dr. from an Agricultural Use to a Single Family Residential Use; and B. That such property be prezoned \"R-1 Single Family\" with a sub-zone designation of \"R-1-1AC\".", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9427, "no_votes": 7825, "total_votes": 17252, "percent_yes": 54.64293994899142, "percent_no": 45.35706005100858, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.766592", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.093583", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "AN INITIATIVE MEASURE RELATING TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MONTAGOMERY AVE. AND NORTH BANK DR.  The people of the City of San Buenaventura do ordain as follows:  A. That the City General Plan be amended to change the designated use of the 25.59 acre property owned by the First Assembly of God Church and located at the northwest corner of Montgomery Ave. and North Bank Dr. from an Agricultural Use to a Single Family Residential Use; and B. That such property be prezoned \"R-1 Single Family\" with a sub-zone designation of \"R-1-1AC\".", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10440, "fingerprint": "1999|199900002|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900002|VENTURA", "content_hash": "d8ac419773b99eaa", "measure_id": "199900002", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance entitled the Moorpark Save Open-Space and Agricultural Resources be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3567, "no_votes": 1694, "total_votes": 5261, "percent_yes": 67.8007983273142, "percent_no": 32.1992016726858, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-01-12", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.765790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.093033", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance entitled the Moorpark Save Open-Space and Agricultural Resources be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10441, "fingerprint": "1999|199900003|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900003|VENTURA", "content_hash": "c8fa2feed49def9f", "measure_id": "199900003", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance entitled an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, adopting a Development Agreement between the City of Moorpark and Hidden Creek Ranch Partners (Messenger Investment Company) Related to the Development of Specific Plan No. 8: Hidden Creek Ranch, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1812, "no_votes": 3455, "total_votes": 5267, "percent_yes": 34.40288589329789, "percent_no": 65.59711410670211, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-01-12", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.766055", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.093216", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance entitled an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, adopting a Development Agreement between the City of Moorpark and Hidden Creek Ranch Partners (Messenger Investment Company) Related to the Development of Specific Plan No. 8: Hidden Creek Ranch, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10446, "fingerprint": "1999|199900274|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900274|YOLO", "content_hash": "ec6288c7c35e6d58", "measure_id": "199900274", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, reconstruct, renovate and repair local schools and improve safety conditions for students, shall the Washington Unified School District, with annual audits and citizen oversight committee, upgrade school facilities, including electrical wiring, heating, cooling and plumbing systems, repair deteriorating roofs, expand and upgrade computer technology and science labs, construct and acquire classrooms, and multi-use rooms and no money for salaries by issuing $17,540,000 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3172, "no_votes": 811, "total_votes": 3983, "percent_yes": 79.63846346974643, "percent_no": 20.361536530253574, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.767529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.094156", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, reconstruct, renovate and repair local schools and improve safety conditions for students, shall the Washington Unified School District, with annual audits and citizen oversight committee, upgrade school facilities, including electrical wiring, heating, cooling and plumbing systems, repair deteriorating roofs, expand and upgrade computer technology and science labs, construct and acquire classrooms, and multi-use rooms and no money for salaries by issuing $17,540,000 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10445, "fingerprint": "1999|199900273|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900273|YOLO", "content_hash": "c71dad3c0e0fcc30", "measure_id": "199900273", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Davis School District renew a special tax for an additional four years at the annual rate of $57.18 per dwelling for multi-dwelling unit parcels and $114.36 per parcel for other parcels, solely to provide: enhanced reading programs; increased instructional programs; reduce class sizes; additional nursing, counseling and support services for students; supplemental staff training; supplemental classroom and library materials; technological materials, equipment and services; and shall the appropriations limit be increased by a like amount?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8274, "no_votes": 1875, "total_votes": 10149, "percent_yes": 81.52527342595329, "percent_no": 18.474726574046713, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.767210", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.093968", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Davis School District renew a special tax for an additional four years at the annual rate of $57.18 per dwelling for multi-dwelling unit parcels and $114.36 per parcel for other parcels, solely to provide: enhanced reading programs; increased instructional programs; reduce class sizes; additional nursing, counseling and support services for students; supplemental staff training; supplemental classroom and library materials; technological materials, equipment and services; and shall the appropriations limit be increased by a like amount?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10447, "fingerprint": "1999|199900275|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1999|199900275|YOLO", "content_hash": "f5965acb5daf481f", "measure_id": "199900275", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1999, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall a new high school be constructed including necessary sitework, existing schools be rehabilitated, and new buildings be constructed at some existing schools to provide for comparable facilities at all sites by issuing General Obligation Bonds to benefit the community and students of the Woodland Joint Unified School District in the maximum amount of $40,000,000, with interest not exceeding the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5954, "no_votes": 1914, "total_votes": 7868, "percent_yes": 75.67361464158617, "percent_no": 24.32638535841383, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1999-11-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.767942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.094339", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a new high school be constructed including necessary sitework, existing schools be rehabilitated, and new buildings be constructed at some existing schools to provide for comparable facilities at all sites by issuing General Obligation Bonds to benefit the community and students of the Woodland Joint Unified School District in the maximum amount of $40,000,000, with interest not exceeding the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12198, "fingerprint": "1998|199800302|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800302|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b6c426ed94502a24", "measure_id": "199800302", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article XII of the City Charter be amended to make specific changes in the manner in which the Public Utilities Board may manage and operate utilities under its control and to require majority voter approval for the Public Utilities Board to engage in any business which does not involve providing electricity or communications utility service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10547, "no_votes": 9915, "total_votes": 20462, "percent_yes": 51.544326067833055, "percent_no": 48.455673932166945, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.377969", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.771335", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.096364", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article XII of the City Charter be amended to make specific changes in the manner in which the Public Utilities Board may manage and operate utilities under its control and to require majority voter approval for the Public Utilities Board to engage in any business which does not involve providing electricity or communications utility service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10449, "fingerprint": "1998|199800028|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800028|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7464842a3c091719", "measure_id": "199800028", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Fremont Unified School District maintain, repair and renovate schools; repair roofs; improve fire safety, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and electrical systems; upgrade schools to a uniform district standard which includes computer facilities, science labs and libraries; acquire and construct classrooms, sites and school facilities; reduce K-3 class size and reduce over-crowding by issuing  $168,583,588 of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8157, "no_votes": 7113, "total_votes": 15270, "percent_yes": 53.418467583497055, "percent_no": 46.581532416502945, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.768688", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.094707", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Fremont Unified School District maintain, repair and renovate schools; repair roofs; improve fire safety, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and electrical systems; upgrade schools to a uniform district standard which includes computer facilities, science labs and libraries; acquire and construct classrooms, sites and school facilities; reduce K-3 class size and reduce over-crowding by issuing  $168,583,588 of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12199, "fingerprint": "1998|199800303|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800303|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b974ce3ed813ddae", "measure_id": "199800303", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing 2% portion of the utility users tax on telephone users, electricity users, gas users, and cable television users, adopted via Ordinance No. 2691 on May 2, 1995, be continued?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10002, "no_votes": 9924, "total_votes": 19926, "percent_yes": 50.195724179464015, "percent_no": 49.804275820535985, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.378247", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.771690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.096546", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing 2% portion of the utility users tax on telephone users, electricity users, gas users, and cable television users, adopted via Ordinance No. 2691 on May 2, 1995, be continued?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10450, "fingerprint": "1998|199800083|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800083|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "18ea936308e55691", "measure_id": "199800083", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Alameda County voters authorize a 15-year extension of the 1/2 cent sales tax to fund the following transportation projects: expand BART; increase AC Transit, bus, rail and ferry service; maintain local streets; I-880/ I-680/ I-580/ I-238 improvements; Altamont Commuter Rail; Pedestrian and bicycle access and safety; transit services for seniors and persons with disabilities.  All geographic areas shall receive their fair share of revenues.  Expenditures shall be audited by a Citizens Watchdog Committee.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 153231, "no_votes": 107514, "total_votes": 260745, "percent_yes": 58.76661105677962, "percent_no": 41.23338894322038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.768970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.094897", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Alameda County voters authorize a 15-year extension of the 1/2 cent sales tax to fund the following transportation projects: expand BART; increase AC Transit, bus, rail and ferry service; maintain local streets; I-880/ I-680/ I-580/ I-238 improvements; Altamont Commuter Rail; Pedestrian and bicycle access and safety; transit services for seniors and persons with disabilities.  All geographic areas shall receive their fair share of revenues.  Expenditures shall be audited by a Citizens Watchdog Committee.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12205, "fingerprint": "1998|199800515|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800515|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e6152e346f7d1f6e", "measure_id": "199800515", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue the special programs authorized by over 83% of Berkeley's voters in 1994 under the \"Berkeley Public Schools Educational Excellence Act of 1994'\"(BSEP), specifically: reducing class sizes, school enrichment programs, elementary music, books and educational materials, and improved school security and maintenance, shall the Berkeley Unified School District's appropriations limit be adjusted as necessary with no increase in District taxes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 34813, "no_votes": 2979, "total_votes": 37792, "percent_yes": 92.11737933954277, "percent_no": 7.882620660457235, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.385366", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.779568", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.100966", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue the special programs authorized by over 83% of Berkeley's voters in 1994 under the \"Berkeley Public Schools Educational Excellence Act of 1994'\"(BSEP), specifically: reducing class sizes, school enrichment programs, elementary music, books and educational materials, and improved school security and maintenance, shall the Berkeley Unified School District's appropriations limit be adjusted as necessary with no increase in District taxes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12197, "fingerprint": "1998|199800140|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800140|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b1d671a0e1097d73", "measure_id": "199800140", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you approve modifications to Charter Sections 3, 8, & 9 as set forth in the voter registration pamphlet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2672, "no_votes": 839, "total_votes": 3511, "percent_yes": 76.10367416690401, "percent_no": 23.896325833095986, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.375953", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.769301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.095084", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you approve modifications to Charter Sections 3, 8, & 9 as set forth in the voter registration pamphlet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10448, "fingerprint": "1998|199800027|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800027|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9f5dd9d4df389e98", "measure_id": "199800027", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide financing for improvements to older classrooms, to replace leaking and aging roofs, to upgrade heating, electrical lighting and plumbing systems, and science and computer laboratories, and for renovation, improvement, construction and acquisition of and additions to school facilities and grounds for the Castro Valley Unified District, shall the District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of up to $36,555,000.00 to bear interest rates not exceeding the legal maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5261, "no_votes": 2432, "total_votes": 7693, "percent_yes": 68.38684518393345, "percent_no": 31.613154816066555, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.768247", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.094519", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide financing for improvements to older classrooms, to replace leaking and aging roofs, to upgrade heating, electrical lighting and plumbing systems, and science and computer laboratories, and for renovation, improvement, construction and acquisition of and additions to school facilities and grounds for the Castro Valley Unified District, shall the District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of up to $36,555,000.00 to bear interest rates not exceeding the legal maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12206, "fingerprint": "1998|199800516|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800516|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "777076e17cbc8df8", "measure_id": "199800516", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Berkeley Board of Education be advised to adjust the District's Appropriations Limit (\"Gann Limit\") without an additional election in 2002, as is permitted by law, to save the costs of such an election and continue spending, for the final four years approved by voters, revenues raised by the \"Berkeley Public Schools Educational Excellence Act of 1994\" (BSEP) for reduced class sizes and other enrichment programs? (This is not a new tax.)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27085, "no_votes": 6400, "total_votes": 33485, "percent_yes": 80.88696431237867, "percent_no": 19.113035687621334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.385722", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.779919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.101147", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Berkeley Board of Education be advised to adjust the District's Appropriations Limit (\"Gann Limit\") without an additional election in 2002, as is permitted by law, to save the costs of such an election and continue spending, for the final four years approved by voters, revenues raised by the \"Berkeley Public Schools Educational Excellence Act of 1994\" (BSEP) for reduced class sizes and other enrichment programs? (This is not a new tax.)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10452, "fingerprint": "1998|199800142|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800142|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "8db27fef35af9076", "measure_id": "199800142", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to impose on \"Firearms Dealers\" a higher tax rate of $24 per $1000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53583, "no_votes": 19658, "total_votes": 73241, "percent_yes": 73.15984216490763, "percent_no": 26.84015783509237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.769916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.095451", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to impose on \"Firearms Dealers\" a higher tax rate of $24 per $1000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12200, "fingerprint": "1998|199800304|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800304|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "988d55528ec0850d", "measure_id": "199800304", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a special tax of up to $0.008 (8/10 of 1\u00a2) per square foot of improvements, effective January 1,1999, in the City of Berkeley to fund emergency services and incidental case management for severely physically disabled persons? Financial Implications: The Special Tax Rate of $0.008 (8/10 of 1\u00a2) per square foot of improvement would result in an annual cost of $15.20 for an average 1,900 square foot home.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25854, "no_votes": 11194, "total_votes": 37048, "percent_yes": 69.78514359749514, "percent_no": 30.214856402504864, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.378541", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.771971", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.096732", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted imposing a special tax of up to $0.008 (8/10 of 1\u00a2) per square foot of improvements, effective January 1,1999, in the City of Berkeley to fund emergency services and incidental case management for severely physically disabled persons? Financial Implications: The Special Tax Rate of $0.008 (8/10 of 1\u00a2) per square foot of improvement would result in an annual cost of $15.20 for an average 1,900 square foot home.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10453, "fingerprint": "1998|199800143|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800143|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f5535e9592f11820", "measure_id": "199800143", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Oakland City Charter section 202 be amended at paragraph (b) to allow appointments to vacancies in the four (4) non-Mayoral appointee seats on the Public Ethics Commission by a vote of at least four (4) of the members of the Public Ethics Commission and to provide for staggered terms for both Mayoral and non-Mayoral appointees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39337, "no_votes": 23353, "total_votes": 62690, "percent_yes": 62.7484447280268, "percent_no": 37.2515552719732, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.770182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.095633", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Oakland City Charter section 202 be amended at paragraph (b) to allow appointments to vacancies in the four (4) non-Mayoral appointee seats on the Public Ethics Commission by a vote of at least four (4) of the members of the Public Ethics Commission and to provide for staggered terms for both Mayoral and non-Mayoral appointees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10461, "fingerprint": "1998|199800313|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800313|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a48bdefb4be4035b", "measure_id": "199800313", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall it be the policy of the City of Emeryville to request the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and CalTrans to include passenger rail service as part of the redesign of the Bay Bridge in order to reduce regional traffic congestion, promote regional mass transit use, and protect the environment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1471, "no_votes": 366, "total_votes": 1837, "percent_yes": 80.07621121393576, "percent_no": 19.923788786064236, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.774959", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.098395", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be the policy of the City of Emeryville to request the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and CalTrans to include passenger rail service as part of the redesign of the Bay Bridge in order to reduce regional traffic congestion, promote regional mass transit use, and protect the environment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12201, "fingerprint": "1998|199800305|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800305|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a179bb1a37aab747", "measure_id": "199800305", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In accordance with actions by other cities in the East Bay Public Safety Corridor, shall a special tax of $150.00 for each thousand dollars of gross receipts from all merchandise sold by firearms dealers be imposed to provide for the usual and current expenses of City conflict resolution, recreational and educational programs specifically directed at youth? Financial Implications: No dealers subject to the tax at this time.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30212, "no_votes": 6472, "total_votes": 36684, "percent_yes": 82.35743103260276, "percent_no": 17.64256896739724, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.378804", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.772243", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.096926", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In accordance with actions by other cities in the East Bay Public Safety Corridor, shall a special tax of $150.00 for each thousand dollars of gross receipts from all merchandise sold by firearms dealers be imposed to provide for the usual and current expenses of City conflict resolution, recreational and educational programs specifically directed at youth? Financial Implications: No dealers subject to the tax at this time.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10451, "fingerprint": "1998|199800141|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800141|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e788a51f4cf271ba", "measure_id": "199800141", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the City of Hayward approve the continued collection of the Supplemental Building Construction and Improvement Tax; a general tax paid by developers which is used to fund all general governmental services including, not limited to: police, fire and public works?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11065, "no_votes": 6789, "total_votes": 17854, "percent_yes": 61.97490758373474, "percent_no": 38.02509241626526, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.769641", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.095266", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the City of Hayward approve the continued collection of the Supplemental Building Construction and Improvement Tax; a general tax paid by developers which is used to fund all general governmental services including, not limited to: police, fire and public works?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12202, "fingerprint": "1998|199800306|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800306|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "05ebfdc8933071a5", "measure_id": "199800306", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a charge of $0.51 (51\u00a2) per square foot of all improvements over the first 120,000 square feet be assessed on all large nonprofit  organizations within the City of Berkeley? Financial Implications: This charge, which would be indexed for inflation, is expected to raise approximately $250,000 in FY 1998-1999 and greater amounts thereafter.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20800, "no_votes": 13237, "total_votes": 34037, "percent_yes": 61.10996856362194, "percent_no": 38.89003143637806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.379058", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.772515", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.097109", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a charge of $0.51 (51\u00a2) per square foot of all improvements over the first 120,000 square feet be assessed on all large nonprofit  organizations within the City of Berkeley? Financial Implications: This charge, which would be indexed for inflation, is expected to raise approximately $250,000 in FY 1998-1999 and greater amounts thereafter.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10454, "fingerprint": "1998|199800144|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800144|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f80f1d82890c2a43", "measure_id": "199800144", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Pleasanton adopt an ordinance that (1) requires firearms sales to be regulated through a permitting process and (2) prohibits in Pleasanton the sale of certain specified handguns deemed to be inadequately designed and/ or poorly manufactured, commonly known as \"Saturday Night Specials?\"", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9472, "no_votes": 4942, "total_votes": 14414, "percent_yes": 65.71388927431664, "percent_no": 34.28611072568336, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.770448", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.095818", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Pleasanton adopt an ordinance that (1) requires firearms sales to be regulated through a permitting process and (2) prohibits in Pleasanton the sale of certain specified handguns deemed to be inadequately designed and/ or poorly manufactured, commonly known as \"Saturday Night Specials?\"", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12203, "fingerprint": "1998|199800307|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800307|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "1a0b4d70559c4897", "measure_id": "199800307", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a thirty-five hour work week for all employees, make overtime in excess of thirty-five hours a week voluntary and compensable at twice the hourly rate, and prohibit  City contracts and business licenses to noncomplying businesses? Financial Implications: $13 to $23 million in increased City overtime costs; increase in cost of City contracts and ordinance enforcement, amount uncertain; decrease in City services.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6265, "no_votes": 30887, "total_votes": 37152, "percent_yes": 16.863156761412572, "percent_no": 83.13684323858743, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.379332", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.772879", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.097301", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a thirty-five hour work week for all employees, make overtime in excess of thirty-five hours a week voluntary and compensable at twice the hourly rate, and prohibit  City contracts and business licenses to noncomplying businesses? Financial Implications: $13 to $23 million in increased City overtime costs; increase in cost of City contracts and ordinance enforcement, amount uncertain; decrease in City services.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10455, "fingerprint": "1998|199800145|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800145|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "7712619c315e7c1a", "measure_id": "199800145", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance providing for a 3% business license fee levied on firearm's dealers based on the sale of concealable firearms and ammunition be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8529, "no_votes": 7500, "total_votes": 16029, "percent_yes": 53.20980722440577, "percent_no": 46.79019277559423, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.770714", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.095999", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance providing for a 3% business license fee levied on firearm's dealers based on the sale of concealable firearms and ammunition be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10465, "fingerprint": "1998|199800317|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800317|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b80daa2622ed6aa1", "measure_id": "199800317", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Hayward change the General Plan designation on approximately 155.5 acres of the south of 92 Area Oliver and Weber properties from Open Space-Baylands to Open-Space Parks and Recreation, Residential-Low Density, and Industrial Corridor, to allow for the complete implementation of the City approved Specific Plan which includes a mixed use single family residential-business development, business park, light manufacturing area, sports park, open space buffer, wetlands preservation area, and two neighborhood parks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13684, "no_votes": 10689, "total_votes": 24373, "percent_yes": 56.14409387436918, "percent_no": 43.85590612563082, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.776252", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.099124", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Hayward change the General Plan designation on approximately 155.5 acres of the south of 92 Area Oliver and Weber properties from Open Space-Baylands to Open-Space Parks and Recreation, Residential-Low Density, and Industrial Corridor, to allow for the complete implementation of the City approved Specific Plan which includes a mixed use single family residential-business development, business park, light manufacturing area, sports park, open space buffer, wetlands preservation area, and two neighborhood parks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12204, "fingerprint": "1998|199800308|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800308|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "18d0b7b759e9fbf5", "measure_id": "199800308", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which amends the Rent Stabilization And Eviction For Good Cause Ordinance to delete the requirement that landlords prove compliance with rent ceiling and registration requirements and that the premises are habitable, in the case of tenants who are engaged in violating the lease by subleasing, assigning, disturbing other tenants, committing a nuisance or using the premises for illegal purposes including selling illegal drugs? Financial Implications: None.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15771, "no_votes": 20239, "total_votes": 36010, "percent_yes": 43.79616773118578, "percent_no": 56.20383226881422, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.379617", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.773408", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.097489", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which amends the Rent Stabilization And Eviction For Good Cause Ordinance to delete the requirement that landlords prove compliance with rent ceiling and registration requirements and that the premises are habitable, in the case of tenants who are engaged in violating the lease by subleasing, assigning, disturbing other tenants, committing a nuisance or using the premises for illegal purposes including selling illegal drugs? Financial Implications: None.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10456, "fingerprint": "1998|199800146|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800146|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "3bb6ad81c9a16a93", "measure_id": "199800146", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the increase to business license fees to be charged by the City to businesses operating in the City adopted by ordinance No. 98-04 be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5910, "no_votes": 9025, "total_votes": 14935, "percent_yes": 39.57147639772347, "percent_no": 60.42852360227653, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.771007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.096184", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the increase to business license fees to be charged by the City to businesses operating in the City adopted by ordinance No. 98-04 be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10457, "fingerprint": "1998|199800309|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800309|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "579730fd271ed674", "measure_id": "199800309", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to clarify that the existing responsibilities and duties of the Auditor are authorized by the Charter? Financial Implications: No financial effect.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 28687, "no_votes": 3774, "total_votes": 32461, "percent_yes": 88.37374079664828, "percent_no": 11.626259203351722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.773733", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.097671", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended to clarify that the existing responsibilities and duties of the Auditor are authorized by the Charter? Financial Implications: No financial effect.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10458, "fingerprint": "1998|199800310|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800310|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "dab1451cc7ad8208", "measure_id": "199800310", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended, effective December 1998, to increase monthly remuneration of the Mayor to $2,850 and of Councilmembers to $1,800; authorize future cost of living adjustments; allow for two excused absences due to illness and provided that any remuneration not accepted by the Mayor or Councilmembers be used for their official expenses? Financial Implications:  Increased annual cost of $102,000 adjusted by the increase in the cost of living.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21594, "no_votes": 14010, "total_votes": 35604, "percent_yes": 60.65048870913381, "percent_no": 39.34951129086619, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.774046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.097854", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Berkeley be amended, effective December 1998, to increase monthly remuneration of the Mayor to $2,850 and of Councilmembers to $1,800; authorize future cost of living adjustments; allow for two excused absences due to illness and provided that any remuneration not accepted by the Mayor or Councilmembers be used for their official expenses? Financial Implications:  Increased annual cost of $102,000 adjusted by the increase in the cost of living.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10459, "fingerprint": "1998|199800311|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800311|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "77a01e7a8ec3cbed", "measure_id": "199800311", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the city of Berkeley be amended to elect for Mayor, Auditor or Council office the candidate who receives the highest number of votes cast for that office, but at least 45% of those votes? Financial Implications: Savings of up to $125,000 per City-wide election if no run-off, up to $37,000 per election in a single district if no run-off.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22768, "no_votes": 12184, "total_votes": 34952, "percent_yes": 65.14076447699702, "percent_no": 34.85923552300298, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.774313", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.098035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the city of Berkeley be amended to elect for Mayor, Auditor or Council office the candidate who receives the highest number of votes cast for that office, but at least 45% of those votes? Financial Implications: Savings of up to $125,000 per City-wide election if no run-off, up to $37,000 per election in a single district if no run-off.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10460, "fingerprint": "1998|199800312|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800312|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f1d6a00d9886e1d2", "measure_id": "199800312", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall it be the policy of the City of Berkeley to request that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and CalTrans include passenger rail services as part of the redesign of the Bay Bridge in order to reduce regional traffic congestion, promote regional mass transit use and protect the environment? Financial Implications: None for the City of Berkeley.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26824, "no_votes": 8655, "total_votes": 35479, "percent_yes": 75.60528763493897, "percent_no": 24.394712365061025, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.774579", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.098215", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be the policy of the City of Berkeley to request that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and CalTrans include passenger rail services as part of the redesign of the Bay Bridge in order to reduce regional traffic congestion, promote regional mass transit use and protect the environment? Financial Implications: None for the City of Berkeley.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10462, "fingerprint": "1998|199800314|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800314|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e4c31cf551408821", "measure_id": "199800314", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Since 1994, the Hotel/ Motel Tax rate has been eight percent (8%). Shall this rate continue?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30719, "no_votes": 10937, "total_votes": 41656, "percent_yes": 73.74447858651814, "percent_no": 26.25552141348186, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.775227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.098575", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Since 1994, the Hotel/ Motel Tax rate has been eight percent (8%). Shall this rate continue?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10463, "fingerprint": "1998|199800315|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800315|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "057cc787b59ea997", "measure_id": "199800315", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Hotel/ Motel Tax rate be increased to ten percent (10%), effective December 15, 1998, and the ordinance amended?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12537, "no_votes": 28579, "total_votes": 41116, "percent_yes": 30.49177935596848, "percent_no": 69.50822064403152, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.775491", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.098759", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Hotel/ Motel Tax rate be increased to ten percent (10%), effective December 15, 1998, and the ordinance amended?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10464, "fingerprint": "1998|199800316|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800316|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ebd4ad317c1fd918", "measure_id": "199800316", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fremont adopt the City Charter proposed by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18933, "no_votes": 19737, "total_votes": 38670, "percent_yes": 48.96043444530644, "percent_no": 51.03956555469356, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.775792", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.098944", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fremont adopt the City Charter proposed by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10466, "fingerprint": "1998|199800318|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800318|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "f15139730a683a5c", "measure_id": "199800318", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Livermore participate in the Export Pipeline Facilities Project of the Livermore Amador Valley Water Management Agency, which Project provides limited additional wastewater disposal capacity for Livermore to meet its General Plan, with costs of the additional capacity to be paid by new development?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9891, "no_votes": 10729, "total_votes": 20620, "percent_yes": 47.96799224054316, "percent_no": 52.03200775945684, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.776530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.099309", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Livermore participate in the Export Pipeline Facilities Project of the Livermore Amador Valley Water Management Agency, which Project provides limited additional wastewater disposal capacity for Livermore to meet its General Plan, with costs of the additional capacity to be paid by new development?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10467, "fingerprint": "1998|199800319|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800319|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "b2b9c7c4a4f88096", "measure_id": "199800319", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Livermore submit to the voters for prior approval any proposed action (including approval, purchase or construction of any wastewater facility) which would require any of the following revisions to the existing LAVWMA Joint Powers Agreement: (1) increase the maximum permitted \"dry weather\" flow into wastewater treatment facilities, (2) modify the Service Area limitations, or (3) increase the capacity of the export pipeline(s)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15391, "no_votes": 4388, "total_votes": 19779, "percent_yes": 77.81485413822742, "percent_no": 22.185145861772583, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.776908", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.099491", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Livermore submit to the voters for prior approval any proposed action (including approval, purchase or construction of any wastewater facility) which would require any of the following revisions to the existing LAVWMA Joint Powers Agreement: (1) increase the maximum permitted \"dry weather\" flow into wastewater treatment facilities, (2) modify the Service Area limitations, or (3) increase the capacity of the export pipeline(s)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10471, "fingerprint": "1998|199800323|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800323|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "9de249d5af59498d", "measure_id": "199800323", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the position of Treasurer of the City of Pleasanton be eliminated and the duties consolidated with that of the Director of Finance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15159, "no_votes": 3885, "total_votes": 19044, "percent_yes": 79.59987397605545, "percent_no": 20.40012602394455, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.778446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.100232", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the position of Treasurer of the City of Pleasanton be eliminated and the duties consolidated with that of the Director of Finance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10472, "fingerprint": "1998|199800324|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800324|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "2329223362ec8724", "measure_id": "199800324", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of the elected Mayor be changed from two years to four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9243, "no_votes": 10392, "total_votes": 19635, "percent_yes": 47.07410236822001, "percent_no": 52.92589763177999, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.778723", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.100417", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of the elected Mayor be changed from two years to four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10473, "fingerprint": "1998|199800325|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800325|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "28ffa2167fd86f2e", "measure_id": "199800325", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Pleasanton participate in the Export Pipeline Facilities Project of the Livermore Amador Valley Water Management Agency, which Project provides limited additional wastewater disposal capacity for Livermore to meet its General Plan, with costs of the additional capacity to be paid by new development?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13089, "no_votes": 5367, "total_votes": 18456, "percent_yes": 70.92002600780233, "percent_no": 29.079973992197665, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.778995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.100597", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Pleasanton participate in the Export Pipeline Facilities Project of the Livermore Amador Valley Water Management Agency, which Project provides limited additional wastewater disposal capacity for Livermore to meet its General Plan, with costs of the additional capacity to be paid by new development?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10474, "fingerprint": "1998|199800326|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800326|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "ade6dfea5afcdd8b", "measure_id": "199800326", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Pleasanton submit to the voters for prior approval any proposed action (including approval, purchase or construction of any wastewater facility) which would require any of the following revisions to the existing LAVWMA Joint Powers Agreement: (1) increase the maximum permitted \"dry weather\" flow into wastewater treatment facilities, (2) modify the Service Area limitations, or (3) increase the capacity of the export pipeline(s)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14972, "no_votes": 3569, "total_votes": 18541, "percent_yes": 80.7507685669597, "percent_no": 19.249231433040293, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.779264", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.100779", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Pleasanton submit to the voters for prior approval any proposed action (including approval, purchase or construction of any wastewater facility) which would require any of the following revisions to the existing LAVWMA Joint Powers Agreement: (1) increase the maximum permitted \"dry weather\" flow into wastewater treatment facilities, (2) modify the Service Area limitations, or (3) increase the capacity of the export pipeline(s)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10468, "fingerprint": "1998|199800320|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800320|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "782e01837a6ca0d1", "measure_id": "199800320", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter of the City of Oakland be amended at Sections 200, 202 (d), 216, 302, 305 (e), 400, 401, 500, 501, and 1213 to create a Mayor-Council form of government, provide a two-term limit for the Mayor, require voter approval for increases to City Council compensation, and provide for an elected City Attorney?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68846, "no_votes": 22994, "total_votes": 91840, "percent_yes": 74.96297909407666, "percent_no": 25.03702090592334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.777468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.099678", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter of the City of Oakland be amended at Sections 200, 202 (d), 216, 302, 305 (e), 400, 401, 500, 501, and 1213 to create a Mayor-Council form of government, provide a two-term limit for the Mayor, require voter approval for increases to City Council compensation, and provide for an elected City Attorney?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10469, "fingerprint": "1998|199800321|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800321|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "e2cbeb3b9beac302", "measure_id": "199800321", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall it be the policy of the City of Oakland to request the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and CalTrans to include passenger rail service as part of the redesign of the Bay Bridge in order to reduce regional traffic congestion, promote regional mass transit use, and protect the environment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 55870, "no_votes": 29350, "total_votes": 85220, "percent_yes": 65.55972776343582, "percent_no": 34.440272236564184, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.777762", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.099862", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be the policy of the City of Oakland to request the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and CalTrans to include passenger rail service as part of the redesign of the Bay Bridge in order to reduce regional traffic congestion, promote regional mass transit use, and protect the environment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10470, "fingerprint": "1998|199800322|ALAMEDA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800322|ALAMEDA", "content_hash": "a1152f257efca137", "measure_id": "199800322", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alameda", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to maintain on \"Electric Business\" a higher tax rate of $6 per $1,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25574, "no_votes": 57307, "total_votes": 82881, "percent_yes": 30.85628793088886, "percent_no": 69.14371206911113, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.778095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.100051", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Oakland Municipal Code be amended to maintain on \"Electric Business\" a higher tax rate of $6 per $1,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Alameda County Elections", "url": "https://www.acvote.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10475, "fingerprint": "1998|199800084|ALPINE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800084|ALPINE", "content_hash": "706c767049beac49", "measure_id": "199800084", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Alpine", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors of the County of Alpine, State of California, urge the Governor of the State of California and the California State Legislature to authorize the California Department of Conservation Camp in Alpine County, for the purpose of housing only nonviolent criminals, in a location acceptable to the Board of Supervisors; and to expeditiously solicit the necessary funding for construction of said Conservation Camp from the California State Legislature?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 300, "no_votes": 242, "total_votes": 542, "percent_yes": 55.35055350553506, "percent_no": 44.64944649446494, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.780193", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.101327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors of the County of Alpine, State of California, urge the Governor of the State of California and the California State Legislature to authorize the California Department of Conservation Camp in Alpine County, for the purpose of housing only nonviolent criminals, in a location acceptable to the Board of Supervisors; and to expeditiously solicit the necessary funding for construction of said Conservation Camp from the California State Legislature?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Alpine_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10477, "fingerprint": "1998|199800086|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800086|BUTTE", "content_hash": "15a345b15938b743", "measure_id": "199800086", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to continue providing swimming pool services, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a special tax in CSA 34 at an annual rate not to exceed $6.00 per parcel of real property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1683, "no_votes": 439, "total_votes": 2122, "percent_yes": 79.3119698397738, "percent_no": 20.688030160226205, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.780730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.101691", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to continue providing swimming pool services, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a special tax in CSA 34 at an annual rate not to exceed $6.00 per parcel of real property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10476, "fingerprint": "1998|199800085|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800085|BUTTE", "content_hash": "5947dc101906c20c", "measure_id": "199800085", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In order to continue providing swimming pool services, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a special tax in CSA 31 at an annual rate not to exceed $17.50 per parcel of real property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 537, "no_votes": 199, "total_votes": 736, "percent_yes": 72.96195652173914, "percent_no": 27.03804347826086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.780461", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.101508", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to continue providing swimming pool services, shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing a special tax in CSA 31 at an annual rate not to exceed $17.50 per parcel of real property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10480, "fingerprint": "1998|199800328|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800328|BUTTE", "content_hash": "d0bea6e356b8df33", "measure_id": "199800328", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Gridley be authorized to enact a uniform transient occupancy tax for the privilege of occupying a lodging within the City, with each transient paying a tax in the amount of six percent (6%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 657, "no_votes": 400, "total_votes": 1057, "percent_yes": 62.15704824976348, "percent_no": 37.84295175023652, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.781594", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.102246", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Gridley be authorized to enact a uniform transient occupancy tax for the privilege of occupying a lodging within the City, with each transient paying a tax in the amount of six percent (6%) of the rent charged by the operator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10479, "fingerprint": "1998|199800327|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800327|BUTTE", "content_hash": "47a30488aaba2b6b", "measure_id": "199800327", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Chico's existing policy, which generally provides that only property located inside the city's boundaries is eligible for the city sewer service, be changed to authorize city sewer service to be extended into three areas currently outside of the city's boundaries and commonly known as the Lassen Avenue Corridor, The Avenues and the Chapman-Mulberry Area, without requiring these areas to be annexed to the city?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6581, "no_votes": 6243, "total_votes": 12824, "percent_yes": 51.31784154709919, "percent_no": 48.68215845290081, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.781327", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.102062", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Chico's existing policy, which generally provides that only property located inside the city's boundaries is eligible for the city sewer service, be changed to authorize city sewer service to be extended into three areas currently outside of the city's boundaries and commonly known as the Lassen Avenue Corridor, The Avenues and the Chapman-Mulberry Area, without requiring these areas to be annexed to the city?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10481, "fingerprint": "1998|199800329|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800329|BUTTE", "content_hash": "4139b30a6c3aae9d", "measure_id": "199800329", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the members of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise be elected by districts as described in the citizen initiative ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4758, "no_votes": 4770, "total_votes": 9528, "percent_yes": 49.93702770780856, "percent_no": 50.06297229219144, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.781871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.102432", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the members of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise be elected by districts as described in the citizen initiative ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10478, "fingerprint": "1998|199800242|BUTTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800242|BUTTE", "content_hash": "33c7ef55807f8e6e", "measure_id": "199800242", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Butte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Groundwater nitrate contamination in the Chico area is considered a serious health issue.  The State of California has ordered over 7,000 residences to eliminate their septic systems.  Connecting these properties to the City of Chico's sewer system without mandatory annexation is a solution.  These residents would pay their costs and City residents would not incur any costs.  Should the residents affected by the order be required to annex to the City of Chico in order to connect to the sewer system?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7220, "no_votes": 6011, "total_votes": 13231, "percent_yes": 54.56881566019197, "percent_no": 45.43118433980803, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.781029", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.101873", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Groundwater nitrate contamination in the Chico area is considered a serious health issue.  The State of California has ordered over 7,000 residences to eliminate their septic systems.  Connecting these properties to the City of Chico's sewer system without mandatory annexation is a solution.  These residents would pay their costs and City residents would not incur any costs.  Should the residents affected by the order be required to annex to the City of Chico in order to connect to the sewer system?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Butte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10482, "fingerprint": "1998|199800243|CALAVERAS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800243|CALAVERAS", "content_hash": "2f4be6b51520abae", "measure_id": "199800243", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Calaveras", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance be amended effective January 1, 1999 to increase the rate of tax from six percent (6%) to eight percent (8%) and to allocate the proceeds equally with one-third (1/3) going to the County Road Fund for improvement and maintenance of County roads, one-third (1/3) going to programs that exclusively promote county-wide tourism, and one-third (1/3) going to the County General Fund?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8079, "no_votes": 7446, "total_votes": 15525, "percent_yes": 52.03864734299517, "percent_no": 47.96135265700483, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.782141", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.102618", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance be amended effective January 1, 1999 to increase the rate of tax from six percent (6%) to eight percent (8%) and to allocate the proceeds equally with one-third (1/3) going to the County Road Fund for improvement and maintenance of County roads, one-third (1/3) going to programs that exclusively promote county-wide tourism, and one-third (1/3) going to the County General Fund?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Calaveras_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10483, "fingerprint": "1998|199800087|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800087|COLUSA", "content_hash": "b68d63b82c988a59", "measure_id": "199800087", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the 1989 Colusa County General Plan governing approval of solid waste disposal facilities be amended?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1988, "no_votes": 1687, "total_votes": 3675, "percent_yes": 54.095238095238095, "percent_no": 45.904761904761905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.782410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.102801", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the 1989 Colusa County General Plan governing approval of solid waste disposal facilities be amended?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10484, "fingerprint": "1998|199800244|COLUSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800244|COLUSA", "content_hash": "6978006d8ee422b7", "measure_id": "199800244", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Colusa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Ordinance Amending the 1989 Colusa County General Plan Governing Landfill Regulations and Siting be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1425, "no_votes": 3091, "total_votes": 4516, "percent_yes": 31.55447298494243, "percent_no": 68.44552701505756, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.782674", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.102984", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance Amending the 1989 Colusa County General Plan Governing Landfill Regulations and Siting be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Colusa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12207, "fingerprint": "1998|199800088|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800088|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "fcceffb65378f6c8", "measure_id": "199800088", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "To maintain and improve local neighborhood libraries by buying books, educational materials, technology and computers; to increase and make more consistent the number of hours local libraries will be open; to improve educational programs for children, adults and seniors and to maintain, improve and expand community libraries, shall Ordinance 98-8 of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors be approved to impose a sales tax at the rate of one-eighth of one percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 134552, "no_votes": 73927, "total_votes": 208479, "percent_yes": 64.53983374824323, "percent_no": 35.460166251756775, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.390406", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.783561", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.103548", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve local neighborhood libraries by buying books, educational materials, technology and computers; to increase and make more consistent the number of hours local libraries will be open; to improve educational programs for children, adults and seniors and to maintain, improve and expand community libraries, shall Ordinance 98-8 of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors be approved to impose a sales tax at the rate of one-eighth of one percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10485, "fingerprint": "1998|199800029|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800029|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ab046a61b4724cfd", "measure_id": "199800029", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide adequate classroom space for students throughout the school district, shall the Oakley Union Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $10,000,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2261, "no_votes": 595, "total_votes": 2856, "percent_yes": 79.16666666666666, "percent_no": 20.833333333333343, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.782979", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.103167", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate classroom space for students throughout the school district, shall the Oakley Union Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $10,000,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10486, "fingerprint": "1998|199800030|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800030|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ab9d18f9e3b16021", "measure_id": "199800030", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the San Ramon Valley Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $70,000,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit, to raise funds for the acquisition, construction and improvement of real property, including the authorized school purposes recommended by the Citizens\u2019 Advisory Committee on District Facilities summarized as: add new classrooms at nine schools, construct gymnasium and multipurpose or specialized rooms at nine schools, complete Iron Horse Middle School, construct new middle school, modernize five schools, add kindergarten class size reduction classrooms at sixteen schools, and make technology improvements at three high schools; and for additional projects to the extent of available funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20810, "no_votes": 6274, "total_votes": 27084, "percent_yes": 76.83503175306454, "percent_no": 23.16496824693546, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.783290", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.103348", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Ramon Valley Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $70,000,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit, to raise funds for the acquisition, construction and improvement of real property, including the authorized school purposes recommended by the Citizens\u2019 Advisory Committee on District Facilities summarized as: add new classrooms at nine schools, construct gymnasium and multipurpose or specialized rooms at nine schools, complete Iron Horse Middle School, construct new middle school, modernize five schools, add kindergarten class size reduction classrooms at sixteen schools, and make technology improvements at three high schools; and for additional projects to the extent of available funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10487, "fingerprint": "1998|199800187|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800187|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "bd8d8357e21b1d1c", "measure_id": "199800187", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To allow all students to attend neighborhood schools by building a middle school in Richmond, to repair leaky classroom roofs, provide students with access to additional classroom technology, improve science labs, and upgrade and repair schools throughout the district, shall the West Contra Costa Unified School District issue bonds in the maximum amount of $40 million, with the interest rate not to exceed the amount allowable by law, to renovate, acquire, construct, and modernize school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32895, "no_votes": 10416, "total_votes": 43311, "percent_yes": 75.95068227471081, "percent_no": 24.049317725289185, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.783873", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.103758", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To allow all students to attend neighborhood schools by building a middle school in Richmond, to repair leaky classroom roofs, provide students with access to additional classroom technology, improve science labs, and upgrade and repair schools throughout the district, shall the West Contra Costa Unified School District issue bonds in the maximum amount of $40 million, with the interest rate not to exceed the amount allowable by law, to renovate, acquire, construct, and modernize school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10497, "fingerprint": "1998|199800337|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800337|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "fc4bac11bed1fff1", "measure_id": "199800337", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the five (5) members of the City Council of Orinda be authorized to receive compensation in accordance with Govt. Code Section 36516 in the amount of $300.00 per month subject to annual appropriation from the General Fund of the City of Orinda?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3558, "no_votes": 4663, "total_votes": 8221, "percent_yes": 43.27940639824839, "percent_no": 56.72059360175161, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.786604", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.105614", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the five (5) members of the City Council of Orinda be authorized to receive compensation in accordance with Govt. Code Section 36516 in the amount of $300.00 per month subject to annual appropriation from the General Fund of the City of Orinda?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10491, "fingerprint": "1998|199800331|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800331|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ec53ae1b499f6aa1", "measure_id": "199800331", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance to protect funding for parks in the City of Brentwood be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2704, "no_votes": 2719, "total_votes": 5423, "percent_yes": 49.8617001659598, "percent_no": 50.1382998340402, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.785006", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.104529", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance to protect funding for parks in the City of Brentwood be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10492, "fingerprint": "1998|199800332|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800332|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "d33b26af14e0fc3b", "measure_id": "199800332", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance repealing the City-Wide Park Maintenance District 98-1 be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2456, "no_votes": 2753, "total_votes": 5209, "percent_yes": 47.14916490689192, "percent_no": 52.85083509310808, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.785272", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.104712", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance repealing the City-Wide Park Maintenance District 98-1 be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10495, "fingerprint": "1998|199800335|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800335|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "db781fd1b7c7bdf2", "measure_id": "199800335", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the order adopted on July 28, 1998, by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order as the Incorporation of the City of Oakley (LAFC 97-17) be confirmed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4822, "no_votes": 1450, "total_votes": 6272, "percent_yes": 76.8813775510204, "percent_no": 23.118622448979593, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.786075", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.105253", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the order adopted on July 28, 1998, by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order as the Incorporation of the City of Oakley (LAFC 97-17) be confirmed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10496, "fingerprint": "1998|199800336|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800336|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "6487845418a258e8", "measure_id": "199800336", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall members of the Oakley city council in future elections be elected by district and not at large?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2916, "no_votes": 2744, "total_votes": 5660, "percent_yes": 51.51943462897527, "percent_no": 48.48056537102473, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.786339", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.105432", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the Oakley city council in future elections be elected by district and not at large?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10488, "fingerprint": "1998|199800245|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800245|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "fed788693ab4c8ec", "measure_id": "199800245", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area R-7A be increased to $500,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the fiscal years 1998/99 through 2001/2002 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2528, "no_votes": 1926, "total_votes": 4454, "percent_yes": 56.757970363718, "percent_no": 43.242029636282, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.784142", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.103979", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit under California Article XIII-B for County Service Area R-7A be increased to $500,000 and adjusted for changes in the cost-of-living and population, with the increase effective for the fiscal years 1998/99 through 2001/2002 (inclusive) to provide for the expenditure of funds that will be available to the Service Area during the stated fiscal years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10493, "fingerprint": "1998|199800333|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800333|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "a4fbee96803bb74b", "measure_id": "199800333", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Kensington Protection and Community Services District for Fiscal Year 1998-1999 be established at $1,730,596 and should the limit for that Fiscal Year ( I.e., $1,730,596) be used to determine the limits for Fiscal Years 1999-2000 through 2001-2002?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1999, "no_votes": 411, "total_votes": 2410, "percent_yes": 82.94605809128632, "percent_no": 17.053941908713682, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.785537", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.104891", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the appropriations limit of the Kensington Protection and Community Services District for Fiscal Year 1998-1999 be established at $1,730,596 and should the limit for that Fiscal Year ( I.e., $1,730,596) be used to determine the limits for Fiscal Years 1999-2000 through 2001-2002?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10489, "fingerprint": "1998|199800246|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800246|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "ff9fdc6414330310", "measure_id": "199800246", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Discovery Bay Community Services District adopt the additional purpose of providing for public recreation, including, but not limited to, aquatic parks and recreational harbors, equestrian trails, playgrounds, golf courses, swimming pools, or recreational buildings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1486, "no_votes": 1012, "total_votes": 2498, "percent_yes": 59.48759007205765, "percent_no": 40.51240992794235, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.784407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.104162", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Discovery Bay Community Services District adopt the additional purpose of providing for public recreation, including, but not limited to, aquatic parks and recreational harbors, equestrian trails, playgrounds, golf courses, swimming pools, or recreational buildings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10498, "fingerprint": "1998|199800338|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800338|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "dc8c9f76bf2e487f", "measure_id": "199800338", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance that was placed on the ballot by citizens petition, be adopted to reenact a utility users tax on electricity, gas and telephone services at a new rate, with proceeds deposited into the City\u2019s General Fund and the tax automatically ending after six years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3647, "no_votes": 2587, "total_votes": 6234, "percent_yes": 58.501764517163934, "percent_no": 41.498235482836066, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.786953", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.105799", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance that was placed on the ballot by citizens petition, be adopted to reenact a utility users tax on electricity, gas and telephone services at a new rate, with proceeds deposited into the City\u2019s General Fund and the tax automatically ending after six years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10490, "fingerprint": "1998|199800330|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800330|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "8339b3e2e9ed1cd3", "measure_id": "199800330", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Antioch, when considering approval of residential development, be instructed to phase through land-use planning with concurrent financial planning to provide adequate schools, street improvements, and Highway 4 improvements for a sustained high quality of life, by making new growth pay its own way through maximizing fees, assessment districts, matching fund programs and any other means effective to expedite the construction of needed infrastructure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14200, "no_votes": 6401, "total_votes": 20601, "percent_yes": 68.92869278190379, "percent_no": 31.07130721809621, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Development Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.784707", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.104347", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Antioch, when considering approval of residential development, be instructed to phase through land-use planning with concurrent financial planning to provide adequate schools, street improvements, and Highway 4 improvements for a sustained high quality of life, by making new growth pay its own way through maximizing fees, assessment districts, matching fund programs and any other means effective to expedite the construction of needed infrastructure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10494, "fingerprint": "1998|199800334|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800334|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "be3bdf54ccf92a45", "measure_id": "199800334", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Lafayette levy a special parcel tax of up to $92.00 per parcel for three years, beginning July 1, 1999, to be used solely to increase police patrol services?  During the three-year period, the City will maintain existing funding levels for police services and develop long-term options for providing public safety in Lafayette.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5080, "no_votes": 6175, "total_votes": 11255, "percent_yes": 45.13549533540648, "percent_no": 54.86450466459352, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.785807", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.105074", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Lafayette levy a special parcel tax of up to $92.00 per parcel for three years, beginning July 1, 1999, to be used solely to increase police patrol services?  During the three-year period, the City will maintain existing funding levels for police services and develop long-term options for providing public safety in Lafayette.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10499, "fingerprint": "1998|199800339|CONTRA COSTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800339|CONTRA COSTA", "content_hash": "f0a5e05889352efa", "measure_id": "199800339", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Contra Costa", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Following the expiration of the term of the city clerk elected on November 3,1998, or upon the next vacancy in such office, shall the office of city clerk be made appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1403, "no_votes": 1922, "total_votes": 3325, "percent_yes": 42.19548872180452, "percent_no": 57.80451127819548, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.787222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.105995", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Following the expiration of the term of the city clerk elected on November 3,1998, or upon the next vacancy in such office, shall the office of city clerk be made appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Contra_Costa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Contra Costa County Elections", "url": "https://www.cocovote.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10501, "fingerprint": "1998|199800247|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800247|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "e443bc95dcb82859", "measure_id": "199800247", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County impose a retail sales tax of one-quarter percent for a period of ten years, effective January 1, 1999 in order to raise revenue to support youth and adult recreation programs and community parks and recreation facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3354, "no_votes": 3975, "total_votes": 7329, "percent_yes": 45.76340564879246, "percent_no": 54.23659435120754, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.787757", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.106363", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County impose a retail sales tax of one-quarter percent for a period of ten years, effective January 1, 1999 in order to raise revenue to support youth and adult recreation programs and community parks and recreation facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12208, "fingerprint": "1998|199800248|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800248|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "9191cea675ed4459", "measure_id": "199800248", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Del Norte County Public Library Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance, Chapter 3.05 of the Del Norte County Code be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3696, "no_votes": 3467, "total_votes": 7163, "percent_yes": 51.59849225184978, "percent_no": 48.40150774815022, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.396129", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.788026", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.106546", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Del Norte County Public Library Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance, Chapter 3.05 of the Del Norte County Code be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10500, "fingerprint": "1998|199800089|DEL NORTE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800089|DEL NORTE", "content_hash": "f5cd2eb1311f94ca", "measure_id": "199800089", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Del Norte", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County impose a retail sales tax of one-quarter percent for a period of ten years, effective July 1, 1998, in order to raise revenue for essential County public services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2207, "no_votes": 3440, "total_votes": 5647, "percent_yes": 39.08269877811227, "percent_no": 60.91730122188773, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.787488", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.106176", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County impose a retail sales tax of one-quarter percent for a period of ten years, effective July 1, 1998, in order to raise revenue for essential County public services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Del_Norte_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10503, "fingerprint": "1998|199800090|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800090|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "7ff177e79d9d9180", "measure_id": "199800090", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure A, which would make various amendments to the El Dorado County General Plan with regard to allowable densities for residential development and would add Section 16.12/031 to the El Dorado County Ordinance Code relating to findings required in connection with approvals of final subdivisions maps be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18057, "no_votes": 21296, "total_votes": 39353, "percent_yes": 45.88468477625594, "percent_no": 54.11531522374406, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.788703", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.106925", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure A, which would make various amendments to the El Dorado County General Plan with regard to allowable densities for residential development and would add Section 16.12/031 to the El Dorado County Ordinance Code relating to findings required in connection with approvals of final subdivisions maps be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10504, "fingerprint": "1998|199800091|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800091|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "da3350af40e3fca7", "measure_id": "199800091", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure B, which would amend Section 210.a(3) of the El Dorado County Charter to reflect the fact that the positions of Superior Court Executive Officer and Municipal Court Executive Officer have been combined in the single position of Court Executive Officer, and to specify that, except when otherwise provided by charter, federal or state law, members of appointed county boards and commissions shall serve at the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22880, "no_votes": 12846, "total_votes": 35726, "percent_yes": 64.04299389800146, "percent_no": 35.957006101998545, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.788976", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.107104", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure B, which would amend Section 210.a(3) of the El Dorado County Charter to reflect the fact that the positions of Superior Court Executive Officer and Municipal Court Executive Officer have been combined in the single position of Court Executive Officer, and to specify that, except when otherwise provided by charter, federal or state law, members of appointed county boards and commissions shall serve at the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10505, "fingerprint": "1998|199800092|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800092|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "2e6029a034804c67", "measure_id": "199800092", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure C, which would amend Section 210.a(9) of the El Dorado County Charter relating to the format to be used by the county and all county officers in responding to reports of the Grand Jury, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19697, "no_votes": 13275, "total_votes": 32972, "percent_yes": 59.73856605604756, "percent_no": 40.26143394395244, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.789244", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.107282", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure C, which would amend Section 210.a(9) of the El Dorado County Charter relating to the format to be used by the county and all county officers in responding to reports of the Grand Jury, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10506, "fingerprint": "1998|199800093|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800093|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "8461e910cb1db6bd", "measure_id": "199800093", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure D, which would amend Section 210.a of the El Dorado County Charter by adding subsection 210.a(12) which would require adoption of  policy and procedures for the wide distribution of the Grand Jury Final Report and the Board of Supervisors\u2019 Response to the report, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24762, "no_votes": 10090, "total_votes": 34852, "percent_yes": 71.049007230575, "percent_no": 28.950992769425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.789519", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.107463", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure D, which would amend Section 210.a of the El Dorado County Charter by adding subsection 210.a(12) which would require adoption of  policy and procedures for the wide distribution of the Grand Jury Final Report and the Board of Supervisors\u2019 Response to the report, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10507, "fingerprint": "1998|199800094|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800094|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "7ef78e81baa33167", "measure_id": "199800094", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure E, which would amend Section 210.c of the El Dorado County Charter to harmonize its provisions with those of Proposition 218 which was adopted by the voters of the State of California in November of 1996, relating to required voter or property owner approval of new or increased benefit assessments on real property, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25175, "no_votes": 10142, "total_votes": 35317, "percent_yes": 71.28295155307643, "percent_no": 28.71704844692357, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.789787", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.107649", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure E, which would amend Section 210.c of the El Dorado County Charter to harmonize its provisions with those of Proposition 218 which was adopted by the voters of the State of California in November of 1996, relating to required voter or property owner approval of new or increased benefit assessments on real property, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10508, "fingerprint": "1998|199800095|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800095|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "75a7509feb914abf", "measure_id": "199800095", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure F, which would amend Section 210.b(6) of the El Dorado County Charter relating to the findings required in connection with the approval of contracts by the county for the performance of work by independent contractors, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24942, "no_votes": 10192, "total_votes": 35134, "percent_yes": 70.99106278818239, "percent_no": 29.00893721181761, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.790054", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.107830", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure F, which would amend Section 210.b(6) of the El Dorado County Charter relating to the findings required in connection with the approval of contracts by the county for the performance of work by independent contractors, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10515, "fingerprint": "1998|199800250|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800250|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "34266f893b479a6f", "measure_id": "199800250", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure G be adopted, which would amend Section 403e of the El Dorado County Charter to remove the office of Public Administrator from the currently combined elected office of Sheriff/Coroner/Public Administrator, and to make the office of Public Administrator a separate appointed office of the County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25218, "no_votes": 25581, "total_votes": 50799, "percent_yes": 49.642709502155554, "percent_no": 50.357290497844446, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.791992", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.109081", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure G be adopted, which would amend Section 403e of the El Dorado County Charter to remove the office of Public Administrator from the currently combined elected office of Sheriff/Coroner/Public Administrator, and to make the office of Public Administrator a separate appointed office of the County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10509, "fingerprint": "1998|199800096|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800096|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "957dbc2f78465711", "measure_id": "199800096", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Golden West Community Services District be authorized to increase the present  tax of $120.00 per year by $120.00 per year for a total not to exceed $240.00, and to annually tax each parcel within the District said amount of $240.00 for the improvement and maintenance of roadways and easements within the District, and for other lawful purposes of the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 250, "no_votes": 169, "total_votes": 419, "percent_yes": 59.665871121718375, "percent_no": 40.334128878281625, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.790321", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.108011", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Directors of the Golden West Community Services District be authorized to increase the present  tax of $120.00 per year by $120.00 per year for a total not to exceed $240.00, and to annually tax each parcel within the District said amount of $240.00 for the improvement and maintenance of roadways and easements within the District, and for other lawful purposes of the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10519, "fingerprint": "1998|199800340|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800340|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "c0a2e5b78baf96dd", "measure_id": "199800340", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Placerville adopt an ordinance imposing a sales and use tax of .25% (1/4 of 1%) to be used for police services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2365, "no_votes": 943, "total_votes": 3308, "percent_yes": 71.49334945586457, "percent_no": 28.506650544135425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.793359", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.109831", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Placerville adopt an ordinance imposing a sales and use tax of .25% (1/4 of 1%) to be used for police services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10502, "fingerprint": "1998|199800031|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800031|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "559ff6a1b398cba8", "measure_id": "199800031", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct and acquire permanent classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; to install necessary sewer lines at Rescue Elementary; to upgrade aging heating and air conditioning systems and electrical wiring to accommodate computer technology at all schools; and to make necessary repairs complying with health and safety standards with no money going for salaries; shall the Rescue Union School District issue and sell $27 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3621, "no_votes": 1156, "total_votes": 4777, "percent_yes": 75.80071174377224, "percent_no": 24.19928825622776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:36", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.788299", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.106733", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct and acquire permanent classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; to install necessary sewer lines at Rescue Elementary; to upgrade aging heating and air conditioning systems and electrical wiring to accommodate computer technology at all schools; and to make necessary repairs complying with health and safety standards with no money going for salaries; shall the Rescue Union School District issue and sell $27 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10510, "fingerprint": "1998|199800237|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800237|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "e87e45b275a600a8", "measure_id": "199800237", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount of not more than $150.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal  year 1998-99 and each year thereafter? (Holly Drive Road Zone Benefit #11)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25, "no_votes": 7, "total_votes": 32, "percent_yes": 78.125, "percent_no": 21.875, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-07-21", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.790647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.108188", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount of not more than $150.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal  year 1998-99 and each year thereafter? (Holly Drive Road Zone Benefit #11)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10511, "fingerprint": "1998|199800238|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800238|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "92b68cfe4d312865", "measure_id": "199800238", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount of not more than $150.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 1998-99 and each year thereafter? (Fernwood Cothrin Road Zone Benefit #14)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115, "no_votes": 48, "total_votes": 163, "percent_yes": 70.5521472392638, "percent_no": 29.447852760736197, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-07-21", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.790919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.108365", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount of not more than $150.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 1998-99 and each year thereafter? (Fernwood Cothrin Road Zone Benefit #14)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10512, "fingerprint": "1998|199800239|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800239|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "c1553cafd0358d76", "measure_id": "199800239", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in the amounts as shown on Exhibit A on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 1998/99 and each year thereafter? (Green Valley Oaks Road Zone Benefit #69)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46, "no_votes": 14, "total_votes": 60, "percent_yes": 76.66666666666667, "percent_no": 23.33333333333333, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-07-21", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.791186", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.108543", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in the amounts as shown on Exhibit A on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 1998/99 and each year thereafter? (Green Valley Oaks Road Zone Benefit #69)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10513, "fingerprint": "1998|199800240|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800240|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "a06d8837d5860866", "measure_id": "199800240", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount of not more than $450.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 1998-99 and each year thereafter? (Rolling Ranch Road Zone Benefit #40)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 24, "percent_yes": 75.0, "percent_no": 25.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-07-21", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.791453", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.108723", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount of not more than $450.00 on each parcel of real property commencing with fiscal year 1998-99 and each year thereafter? (Rolling Ranch Road Zone Benefit #40)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10514, "fingerprint": "1998|199800249|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800249|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "641e93d4f7eda82f", "measure_id": "199800249", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors include the Cameron Park Community Services District area within the mandatory residential refuse collection provisions of the El Dorado County Ordinance Code, which would require, subject to-limited exceptions, that improved residential property have and pay for unlimited refuse collection service without regard to the number ofcans actually place out for collection?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2937, "no_votes": 2453, "total_votes": 5390, "percent_yes": 54.48979591836734, "percent_no": 45.51020408163266, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.791721", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.108900", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors include the Cameron Park Community Services District area within the mandatory residential refuse collection provisions of the El Dorado County Ordinance Code, which would require, subject to-limited exceptions, that improved residential property have and pay for unlimited refuse collection service without regard to the number ofcans actually place out for collection?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10516, "fingerprint": "1998|199800251|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800251|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "2aee6e4ee2277976", "measure_id": "199800251", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure V be adopted, which would amend the El Dorado County General Plan to add an objective of limiting the total county-wide population to 260,000 people?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18472, "no_votes": 33642, "total_votes": 52114, "percent_yes": 35.44536976628161, "percent_no": 64.5546302337184, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.792313", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.109267", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure V be adopted, which would amend the El Dorado County General Plan to add an objective of limiting the total county-wide population to 260,000 people?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10517, "fingerprint": "1998|199800252|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800252|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "2cab27a36517f64c", "measure_id": "199800252", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure W (\u201cEl Dorado County Streams and Rivers Preservation Act\u201d) be adopted, which would add Section 5.48.095 to the El Dorado County Ordinance Code to : (1) reduce current levels of commercial rafting operations on the South Fork of the American River by imposing an annual limit of 45,820 user days; and, (2) include all institutional and not-for-profit groups within the definition of commercial rafting operations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20364, "no_votes": 34080, "total_votes": 54444, "percent_yes": 37.40357064139299, "percent_no": 62.59642935860701, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.792590", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.109448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure W (\u201cEl Dorado County Streams and Rivers Preservation Act\u201d) be adopted, which would add Section 5.48.095 to the El Dorado County Ordinance Code to : (1) reduce current levels of commercial rafting operations on the South Fork of the American River by imposing an annual limit of 45,820 user days; and, (2) include all institutional and not-for-profit groups within the definition of commercial rafting operations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10520, "fingerprint": "1998|199800572|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800572|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "aff54c0eb5089727", "measure_id": "199800572", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount of not more than $350.00 on each developable parcel of real property within the boundaries of the zone as shown on exhibit A commencing with the first fiscal year when operation of the drainage facilities is initiated and for each of the following nineteen (19) years thereafter?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18, "no_votes": 0, "total_votes": 18, "percent_yes": 100.0, "percent_no": 0.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-12-08", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.793638", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.110011", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an annual special tax be levied in an amount of not more than $350.00 on each developable parcel of real property within the boundaries of the zone as shown on exhibit A commencing with the first fiscal year when operation of the drainage facilities is initiated and for each of the following nineteen (19) years thereafter?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10518, "fingerprint": "1998|199800253|EL DORADO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800253|EL DORADO", "content_hash": "89de86a03aecc706", "measure_id": "199800253", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "El Dorado", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure Y ( \u201cThe Control Traffic Congestion Initiative\u201d) be adopted, which would add five policies to the El Dorado County General Plan related to: (I) maintenance of specified levels of service on roads in unincorporated areas of the county; (ii) a requirement that new development fully fund roadway capacity improvements needed to offset the traffic impacts of new development projects; and, (iii) establishment of a requirement of voter approval prior to the expenditure of County tax revenues to pay for road capacity improvements to mitigate impacts of new development?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 32847, "no_votes": 20968, "total_votes": 53815, "percent_yes": 61.03688562668401, "percent_no": 38.96311437331599, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.793045", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.109639", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure Y ( \u201cThe Control Traffic Congestion Initiative\u201d) be adopted, which would add five policies to the El Dorado County General Plan related to: (I) maintenance of specified levels of service on roads in unincorporated areas of the county; (ii) a requirement that new development fully fund roadway capacity improvements needed to offset the traffic impacts of new development projects; and, (iii) establishment of a requirement of voter approval prior to the expenditure of County tax revenues to pay for road capacity improvements to mitigate impacts of new development?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/El_Dorado_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "El Dorado County Elections", "url": "https://www.edcgov.us/Government/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12212, "fingerprint": "1998|199800517|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800517|FRESNO", "content_hash": "50d9fa10e909027a", "measure_id": "199800517", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the territory of the Caruthers Union High School District be unified without affecting the Alvina, Monroe, and the Raisin City School Districts and such a new unified school district be governed by a five member Board of Trustees elected by the voters of the territory at large with each trustee to reside in a respective trustee area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 947, "no_votes": 389, "total_votes": 1336, "percent_yes": 70.88323353293413, "percent_no": 29.116766467065872, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.404917", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.797487", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.112389", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the territory of the Caruthers Union High School District be unified without affecting the Alvina, Monroe, and the Raisin City School Districts and such a new unified school district be governed by a five member Board of Trustees elected by the voters of the territory at large with each trustee to reside in a respective trustee area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10523, "fingerprint": "1998|199800188|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800188|FRESNO", "content_hash": "9943c9ddd5a82d31", "measure_id": "199800188", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To acquire, construct and rehabilitate classrooms and school facilities, including a new elementary school, new classrooms at the high school, middle school and continuation schools, and libraries at the elementary schools, shall the Community Facilities District No. 98-01 of the Kerman Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit and levy special taxes for such bonds, facilities and related costs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1089, "no_votes": 761, "total_votes": 1850, "percent_yes": 58.86486486486486, "percent_no": 41.13513513513514, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.794547", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.110561", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To acquire, construct and rehabilitate classrooms and school facilities, including a new elementary school, new classrooms at the high school, middle school and continuation schools, and libraries at the elementary schools, shall the Community Facilities District No. 98-01 of the Kerman Unified School District issue $15,000,000 of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit and levy special taxes for such bonds, facilities and related costs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12209, "fingerprint": "1998|199800189|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800189|FRESNO", "content_hash": "dc545ba6d1bd52ee", "measure_id": "199800189", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For each year commencing with Fiscal Year 1997/98, shall the appropriations limit, as defined by subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution, for Community Facilities District No. 98-1, be an amount equal to $15,000,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 958, "no_votes": 770, "total_votes": 1728, "percent_yes": 55.43981481481482, "percent_no": 44.56018518518518, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.402654", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.794818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.110746", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For each year commencing with Fiscal Year 1997/98, shall the appropriations limit, as defined by subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution, for Community Facilities District No. 98-1, be an amount equal to $15,000,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10521, "fingerprint": "1998|199800097|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800097|FRESNO", "content_hash": "246a6bee633e79b1", "measure_id": "199800097", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-011 of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors be approved to provide needed funding to maintain local public libraries; to expand the current collection of books and materials; to restore operating hours in the evenings, weekdays, and weekends; and to provide literacy and other library services for children, adults and seniors by imposing a sales tax at the rate of one-eighth of one percent for a maximum of 7 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108663, "no_votes": 45579, "total_votes": 154242, "percent_yes": 70.44968296572918, "percent_no": 29.55031703427082, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.793919", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.110194", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-011 of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors be approved to provide needed funding to maintain local public libraries; to expand the current collection of books and materials; to restore operating hours in the evenings, weekdays, and weekends; and to provide literacy and other library services for children, adults and seniors by imposing a sales tax at the rate of one-eighth of one percent for a maximum of 7 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12210, "fingerprint": "1998|199800254|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800254|FRESNO", "content_hash": "083756f80a81d2d3", "measure_id": "199800254", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the Del Rey Community Services District adopt the additional purpose of abatement of graffiti and approve that certain ordinance titled \"An Ordinance Providing for Abatement of Graffiti Services, Providing for Enforcement Under the code of Civil Procedure and Establishing Penalties\" be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 130, "no_votes": 23, "total_votes": 153, "percent_yes": 84.9673202614379, "percent_no": 15.032679738562095, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.403248", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.795675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.111291", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the Del Rey Community Services District adopt the additional purpose of abatement of graffiti and approve that certain ordinance titled \"An Ordinance Providing for Abatement of Graffiti Services, Providing for Enforcement Under the code of Civil Procedure and Establishing Penalties\" be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10524, "fingerprint": "1998|199800190|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800190|FRESNO", "content_hash": "434a644262d9eba7", "measure_id": "199800190", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Bond measure not to exceed $10,100,000 to repair and renovate old classrooms to reduce student overcrowding, provide science labs and classrooms, rewire and upgrade classrooms to accommodate computer technology, expand and upgrade the library, and add classrooms for vocational and agricultural education and other permanent school improvements at the high school.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1769, "no_votes": 747, "total_votes": 2516, "percent_yes": 70.3100158982512, "percent_no": 29.689984101748806, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.795136", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.110930", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Bond measure not to exceed $10,100,000 to repair and renovate old classrooms to reduce student overcrowding, provide science labs and classrooms, rewire and upgrade classrooms to accommodate computer technology, expand and upgrade the library, and add classrooms for vocational and agricultural education and other permanent school improvements at the high school.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12211, "fingerprint": "1998|199800341|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800341|FRESNO", "content_hash": "0e81665886fd6037", "measure_id": "199800341", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fowler be authorized to implement a Utility User\u2019s Tax of five percent (5%) upon residential users of electricity and gas, three percent (3%) upon commercial, industrial, and agricultural users of electricity and gas, and five percent (5%) upon all users of telephone service in the City of Fowler, with the tax terminating on January 1, 2006, as set forth in Ordinance 98-2?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 245, "no_votes": 607, "total_votes": 852, "percent_yes": 28.755868544600936, "percent_no": 71.24413145539907, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.403451", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.795962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.111476", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fowler be authorized to implement a Utility User\u2019s Tax of five percent (5%) upon residential users of electricity and gas, three percent (3%) upon commercial, industrial, and agricultural users of electricity and gas, and five percent (5%) upon all users of telephone service in the City of Fowler, with the tax terminating on January 1, 2006, as set forth in Ordinance 98-2?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10522, "fingerprint": "1998|199800147|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800147|FRESNO", "content_hash": "b74656aaef99e450", "measure_id": "199800147", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-03 be adopted to impose a special utility users tax on the telephone, electricity, gas, and sewer and water users within the City to pay for police and fire protection services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 410, "no_votes": 368, "total_votes": 778, "percent_yes": 52.69922879177378, "percent_no": 47.30077120822622, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.794275", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.110379", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-03 be adopted to impose a special utility users tax on the telephone, electricity, gas, and sewer and water users within the City to pay for police and fire protection services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10526, "fingerprint": "1998|199800342|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800342|FRESNO", "content_hash": "9f586219cc3cb371", "measure_id": "199800342", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the August 1996 increase of 1% (from 12% to 13% per Resolution No. 96-138) to the tax paid by persons staying in hotels in the City of Fresno (Transient Room Tax) be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27143, "no_votes": 46412, "total_votes": 73555, "percent_yes": 36.90163822989599, "percent_no": 63.09836177010401, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.796235", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.111667", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the August 1996 increase of 1% (from 12% to 13% per Resolution No. 96-138) to the tax paid by persons staying in hotels in the City of Fresno (Transient Room Tax) be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10527, "fingerprint": "1998|199800343|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800343|FRESNO", "content_hash": "17adced1501bdd89", "measure_id": "199800343", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the proposed City Charter for the City of Kingsburg be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2021, "no_votes": 637, "total_votes": 2658, "percent_yes": 76.03461249059443, "percent_no": 23.965387509405573, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.796503", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.111848", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed City Charter for the City of Kingsburg be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12213, "fingerprint": "1998|199800518|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800518|FRESNO", "content_hash": "f08360f820ca3484", "measure_id": "199800518", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, repair and upgrade classrooms for student safety, build new classrooms to expand course offerings, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $19 million of bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3969, "no_votes": 2029, "total_votes": 5998, "percent_yes": 66.17205735245082, "percent_no": 33.82794264754918, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.405271", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.797829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.112573", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, repair and upgrade classrooms for student safety, build new classrooms to expand course offerings, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $19 million of bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10525, "fingerprint": "1998|199800191|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800191|FRESNO", "content_hash": "73df86598dc66b08", "measure_id": "199800191", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Bond measure in the amount of $19 million for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2626, "no_votes": 1507, "total_votes": 4133, "percent_yes": 63.53738204693927, "percent_no": 36.46261795306073, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.795405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.111111", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Bond measure in the amount of $19 million for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10528, "fingerprint": "1998|199800344|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800344|FRESNO", "content_hash": "aab107e9f7061f4f", "measure_id": "199800344", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The proposed Ordinance adopts procedures for collecting a hotel occupancy tax.  The tax is ten percent on room rates for persons using lodging space in any hotel for not more than 90 consecutive days.  Hotel owners are required to collect the tax and pay it to the City's General Fund.  The Ordinance contains penalties for delinquent payments and for delinquent reporting by owners.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 365, "no_votes": 346, "total_votes": 711, "percent_yes": 51.33614627285513, "percent_no": 48.66385372714487, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.796768", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.112027", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The proposed Ordinance adopts procedures for collecting a hotel occupancy tax.  The tax is ten percent on room rates for persons using lodging space in any hotel for not more than 90 consecutive days.  Hotel owners are required to collect the tax and pay it to the City's General Fund.  The Ordinance contains penalties for delinquent payments and for delinquent reporting by owners.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10529, "fingerprint": "1998|199800345|FRESNO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800345|FRESNO", "content_hash": "7b4a1305be666ec9", "measure_id": "199800345", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Fresno", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-05 be adopted to impose a general utility tax on the telephone, electricity, gas, and sewer and water users within the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 470, "no_votes": 839, "total_votes": 1309, "percent_yes": 35.905271199388835, "percent_no": 64.09472880061116, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.797215", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.112211", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-05 be adopted to impose a general utility tax on the telephone, electricity, gas, and sewer and water users within the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Fresno_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Fresno County Elections", "url": "https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/county-clerk-registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10530, "fingerprint": "1998|199800032|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800032|GLENN", "content_hash": "ce6c4ba2a1b5849c", "measure_id": "199800032", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the purpose of constructing and acquiring a new library and classrooms for Hamilton High School, shall the Hamilton Union High School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $1,340,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit, to acquire, construct, and renovate school facilities and grounds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 370, "no_votes": 131, "total_votes": 501, "percent_yes": 73.85229540918164, "percent_no": 26.147704590818364, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.798099", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.112756", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the purpose of constructing and acquiring a new library and classrooms for Hamilton High School, shall the Hamilton Union High School District issue and sell bonds in the amount of $1,340,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit, to acquire, construct, and renovate school facilities and grounds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10533, "fingerprint": "1998|199800347|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800347|GLENN", "content_hash": "a99fc886bb7de095", "measure_id": "199800347", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 8 percent to 10 percent be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 811, "no_votes": 864, "total_votes": 1675, "percent_yes": 48.4179104477612, "percent_no": 51.5820895522388, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.798909", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.113313", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 8 percent to 10 percent be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10532, "fingerprint": "1998|199800346|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800346|GLENN", "content_hash": "a99fc886bb7de095", "measure_id": "199800346", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 8 percent to 10 percent be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 430, "no_votes": 975, "total_votes": 1405, "percent_yes": 30.60498220640569, "percent_no": 69.3950177935943, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.798643", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.113128", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Hotel Users Tax from 8 percent to 10 percent be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10531, "fingerprint": "1998|199800255|GLENN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800255|GLENN", "content_hash": "d1a65be362441ebb", "measure_id": "199800255", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Glenn", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Glenn County Code Section 4.12.030, which sets the tax charged to persons who temporarily rent hotel and motel rooms, be amended from five percent to ten percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2448, "no_votes": 4670, "total_votes": 7118, "percent_yes": 34.39168305703849, "percent_no": 65.60831694296151, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.798370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.112941", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Glenn County Code Section 4.12.030, which sets the tax charged to persons who temporarily rent hotel and motel rooms, be amended from five percent to ten percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10534, "fingerprint": "1998|199800098|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800098|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "caae7f337a5075a9", "measure_id": "199800098", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 2163 of Humboldt County be approved to provide needed funding to maintain the local County Library system, to restore and improve hours of operation, books and materials collections, automation and bookmobile services for the use of all residents of the County by raising the local sales tax one-fourth of one cent for a maximum period of 16 years and dedicating the proceeds exclusively to the county Library System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18491, "no_votes": 17653, "total_votes": 36144, "percent_yes": 51.15925188136343, "percent_no": 48.84074811863657, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.799173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.113497", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 2163 of Humboldt County be approved to provide needed funding to maintain the local County Library system, to restore and improve hours of operation, books and materials collections, automation and bookmobile services for the use of all residents of the County by raising the local sales tax one-fourth of one cent for a maximum period of 16 years and dedicating the proceeds exclusively to the county Library System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10535, "fingerprint": "1998|199800148|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800148|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "fae8cbe51487616c", "measure_id": "199800148", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Rio Dell Ordinance Number 228, as amended by Ordinance Number 229, the currently assessed utility users tax of seven percent (7%) on residential customers and two percent (2%) on non-residential customers, a general tax on the use of certain utility services used to fund essential general governmental services such as police, street maintenance, park maintenance and recreation be amended to extend until July 1, 2003?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 367, "no_votes": 369, "total_votes": 736, "percent_yes": 49.86413043478261, "percent_no": 50.13586956521739, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.799446", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.113682", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Rio Dell Ordinance Number 228, as amended by Ordinance Number 229, the currently assessed utility users tax of seven percent (7%) on residential customers and two percent (2%) on non-residential customers, a general tax on the use of certain utility services used to fund essential general governmental services such as police, street maintenance, park maintenance and recreation be amended to extend until July 1, 2003?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10540, "fingerprint": "1998|199800519|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800519|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "416b3fa97d250ef6", "measure_id": "199800519", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funding to repair and modernize aging facilities and infrastructure at all school sites, including inadequate electrical and plumbing systems; to upgrade classrooms, restrooms, and lunch facilities; to replace the deteriorating roof of the middle school; and to comply with state and federal standards to meet the needs of children with disabilities, shall the Arcata Elementary School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $5,400,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit to be used for the above purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4449, "no_votes": 942, "total_votes": 5391, "percent_yes": 82.52643294379521, "percent_no": 17.473567056204786, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.800892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.114620", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funding to repair and modernize aging facilities and infrastructure at all school sites, including inadequate electrical and plumbing systems; to upgrade classrooms, restrooms, and lunch facilities; to replace the deteriorating roof of the middle school; and to comply with state and federal standards to meet the needs of children with disabilities, shall the Arcata Elementary School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $5,400,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit to be used for the above purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10541, "fingerprint": "1998|199800520|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800520|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "dbe971dbbc29cbe0", "measure_id": "199800520", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize aging schools, remove safety hazards, and help reduce class size, shall the South Bay School District incur bonded indebtedness of $1,500,000 at interest rates within the legal limits, for purposes including:  Modernizing schools for computer technology; removing asbestos; replacing leaky roofs, broken heating systems and deteriorating walls, restrooms, and flooring; constructing new classrooms/facilities, a school library, and community center; upgrading security and fire alarms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1715, "no_votes": 721, "total_votes": 2436, "percent_yes": 70.40229885057471, "percent_no": 29.59770114942529, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.801192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.114805", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize aging schools, remove safety hazards, and help reduce class size, shall the South Bay School District incur bonded indebtedness of $1,500,000 at interest rates within the legal limits, for purposes including:  Modernizing schools for computer technology; removing asbestos; replacing leaky roofs, broken heating systems and deteriorating walls, restrooms, and flooring; constructing new classrooms/facilities, a school library, and community center; upgrading security and fire alarms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10539, "fingerprint": "1998|199800350|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800350|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "f815cacca724e59a", "measure_id": "199800350", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Rio Dell adopt Ordinance Number 234, enacting a utility users tax of seven percent (7%) on residential customers and two percent (2%) on commercial customers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 392, "no_votes": 512, "total_votes": 904, "percent_yes": 43.36283185840708, "percent_no": 56.63716814159292, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.800621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.114439", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Rio Dell adopt Ordinance Number 234, enacting a utility users tax of seven percent (7%) on residential customers and two percent (2%) on commercial customers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10537, "fingerprint": "1998|199800348|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800348|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "1b12aa119573c970", "measure_id": "199800348", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council: (1) co-sponsor two town hall meetings on the topic, \u201cCan we have democracy when large corporations wield so much power and wealth under law?\u201d (2) create a committee to recommend the adoption of policies and programs in regard to Democracy and Corporations, and (3) forward copies of the ballot measure to all elected representatives at the county, state and federal levels, as well as to the press?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3579, "no_votes": 2562, "total_votes": 6141, "percent_yes": 58.28041035661944, "percent_no": 41.71958964338056, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.800085", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.114056", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council: (1) co-sponsor two town hall meetings on the topic, \u201cCan we have democracy when large corporations wield so much power and wealth under law?\u201d (2) create a committee to recommend the adoption of policies and programs in regard to Democracy and Corporations, and (3) forward copies of the ballot measure to all elected representatives at the county, state and federal levels, as well as to the press?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10538, "fingerprint": "1998|199800349|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800349|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "b44acbaa09481cd5", "measure_id": "199800349", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fourtuna Municipal Code Number 3.12.030, the currently assessed transient occupancy tax (bed tax for motels and RV parks) of eight percent (8%) be amended to allow the City to increase such tax up to a maximum of ten percent (10%)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1636, "no_votes": 1710, "total_votes": 3346, "percent_yes": 48.89420203227735, "percent_no": 51.10579796772265, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.800355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.114252", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fourtuna Municipal Code Number 3.12.030, the currently assessed transient occupancy tax (bed tax for motels and RV parks) of eight percent (8%) be amended to allow the City to increase such tax up to a maximum of ten percent (10%)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10536, "fingerprint": "1998|199800192|HUMBOLDT|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800192|HUMBOLDT", "content_hash": "dbe971dbbc29cbe0", "measure_id": "199800192", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Humboldt", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and modernize aging schools, remove safety hazards, and help reduce class size, shall the South Bay School District incur bonded indebtedness of $1,500,000 at interest rates within the legal limits, for purposes including:  Modernizing schools for computer technology; removing asbestos; replacing leaky roofs, broken heating systems and deteriorating walls, restrooms, and flooring; constructing new classrooms/facilities, a school library, and community center; upgrading security and fire alarms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1127, "no_votes": 656, "total_votes": 1783, "percent_yes": 63.20807627593943, "percent_no": 36.79192372406057, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.799809", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.113870", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and modernize aging schools, remove safety hazards, and help reduce class size, shall the South Bay School District incur bonded indebtedness of $1,500,000 at interest rates within the legal limits, for purposes including:  Modernizing schools for computer technology; removing asbestos; replacing leaky roofs, broken heating systems and deteriorating walls, restrooms, and flooring; constructing new classrooms/facilities, a school library, and community center; upgrading security and fire alarms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Humboldt_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10542, "fingerprint": "1998|199800033|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800033|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "0f918d9db7117b89", "measure_id": "199800033", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To modernize and improve health and safety conditions at District facilities, including replacing inadequate electrical and air-conditioning/heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, water treatment and sewer systems, upgrading the kitchens and technological capabilities of its schools, and acquiring land, constructing and, modernizing school facilities to achieve the foregoing, shall the Heber Elementary School District issue up to $2.5 million of general obligation bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140, "no_votes": 56, "total_votes": 196, "percent_yes": 71.42857142857143, "percent_no": 28.57142857142857, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.801489", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.114994", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To modernize and improve health and safety conditions at District facilities, including replacing inadequate electrical and air-conditioning/heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing, water treatment and sewer systems, upgrading the kitchens and technological capabilities of its schools, and acquiring land, constructing and, modernizing school facilities to achieve the foregoing, shall the Heber Elementary School District issue up to $2.5 million of general obligation bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10543, "fingerprint": "1998|199800149|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800149|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "6935456a84215896", "measure_id": "199800149", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Brawley reinstitute the collection of the four percent Utility User\u2019s Tax (as set forth in Ordinance Nos. 92-13 and 96-15) upon the following utility services:  defined telephone, electricity, gas, water, sewer, trash collection and cable television; in order to maintain city public services, including, but not limited to : police, fire emergency, administration, library, and parks and recreation; said tax to terminate ten (10) years after it is reinstituted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2128, "no_votes": 1483, "total_votes": 3611, "percent_yes": 58.93104403212407, "percent_no": 41.06895596787593, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.801763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.115183", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Brawley reinstitute the collection of the four percent Utility User\u2019s Tax (as set forth in Ordinance Nos. 92-13 and 96-15) upon the following utility services:  defined telephone, electricity, gas, water, sewer, trash collection and cable television; in order to maintain city public services, including, but not limited to : police, fire emergency, administration, library, and parks and recreation; said tax to terminate ten (10) years after it is reinstituted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10544, "fingerprint": "1998|199800193|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800193|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "1d1d9c2059ffd8ab", "measure_id": "199800193", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Imperial Community College District incur bonded indebtedness in a total principal amount of $15,000,000 at a rate not to exceed the maximum permitted by law for the purpose of constructing school buildings for additional science and English classrooms, teacher and administrative offices and for student services, and for the purpose of remodeling existing school buildings for additional computer laboratories and teacher and administrative offices,  and for student services, and for the purpose of remodeling existing school buildings for additional computer laboratories and teacher and administrative offices, and for additions to the student union building, and for the purpose of constructing additional parking?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12477, "no_votes": 6683, "total_votes": 19160, "percent_yes": 65.12004175365345, "percent_no": 34.87995824634655, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.802033", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.115378", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Imperial Community College District incur bonded indebtedness in a total principal amount of $15,000,000 at a rate not to exceed the maximum permitted by law for the purpose of constructing school buildings for additional science and English classrooms, teacher and administrative offices and for student services, and for the purpose of remodeling existing school buildings for additional computer laboratories and teacher and administrative offices,  and for student services, and for the purpose of remodeling existing school buildings for additional computer laboratories and teacher and administrative offices, and for additions to the student union building, and for the purpose of constructing additional parking?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10547, "fingerprint": "1998|199800522|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800522|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "4c6dba754f78ce69", "measure_id": "199800522", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Imperial Community College District incur bonded indebtedness in a total principal amount of $15,000,000 at a rate not to exceed the maximum permitted by law for the purpose of constructing school buildings for additional science and English classrooms, teacher and administrative offices, and for student services, and for the purpose of remodeling existing school buildings for additional computer laboratories and teacher and administrative offices and for additions to the student union building, and for the purpose of constructing additional parking?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11287, "no_votes": 11091, "total_votes": 22378, "percent_yes": 50.4379301099294, "percent_no": 49.5620698900706, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.802910", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.115933", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Imperial Community College District incur bonded indebtedness in a total principal amount of $15,000,000 at a rate not to exceed the maximum permitted by law for the purpose of constructing school buildings for additional science and English classrooms, teacher and administrative offices, and for student services, and for the purpose of remodeling existing school buildings for additional computer laboratories and teacher and administrative offices and for additions to the student union building, and for the purpose of constructing additional parking?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10545, "fingerprint": "1998|199800351|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800351|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "776f489171f3ce7d", "measure_id": "199800351", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "The rate of each utility tax of the City of Holtville is hereby reduced to three percent (3%) from (5%) beginning July 1, 1997; with a further reduction to one percent (1%) from three percent (3%) beginning July 1 1998; with the tax to be entirely eliminated effective July 1, 1999.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 509, "no_votes": 622, "total_votes": 1131, "percent_yes": 45.00442086648983, "percent_no": 54.99557913351017, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.802300", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.115564", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "The rate of each utility tax of the City of Holtville is hereby reduced to three percent (3%) from (5%) beginning July 1, 1997; with a further reduction to one percent (1%) from three percent (3%) beginning July 1 1998; with the tax to be entirely eliminated effective July 1, 1999.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10546, "fingerprint": "1998|199800521|IMPERIAL|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800521|IMPERIAL", "content_hash": "c11a1039a4e7a668", "measure_id": "199800521", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Imperial", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Brawley Union High School District incur bonded indebtedness of up to $10,000,000.00, at interest rates within legal limits to repair and modernize older buildings at Brawley Union High School and improve school facilities, including retrofitting 41 older classrooms for computers and learning technology, repairing school plumbing, restrooms, flooring, walls, windows, and electrical systems, building centers for academic tutoring and vocational education, and athletic facilities, and acquiring land and new classrooms for future growth and class size reduction?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3418, "no_votes": 1491, "total_votes": 4909, "percent_yes": 69.6272153188022, "percent_no": 30.3727846811978, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.802610", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.115747", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Brawley Union High School District incur bonded indebtedness of up to $10,000,000.00, at interest rates within legal limits to repair and modernize older buildings at Brawley Union High School and improve school facilities, including retrofitting 41 older classrooms for computers and learning technology, repairing school plumbing, restrooms, flooring, walls, windows, and electrical systems, building centers for academic tutoring and vocational education, and athletic facilities, and acquiring land and new classrooms for future growth and class size reduction?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Imperial_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12216, "fingerprint": "1998|199800523|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800523|KERN", "content_hash": "8425c26112d4a6f6", "measure_id": "199800523", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide students with classrooms for math, science, vocational training and basic high school requirements, offer comparable classrooms to all students, and give students access to technology shall Delano Joint Union High School District construct and acquire a new high school in Delano by issuing $27 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit provided that spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and no money goes to administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3325, "no_votes": 894, "total_votes": 4219, "percent_yes": 78.81014458402466, "percent_no": 21.189855415975344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.413513", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.806481", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.118326", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide students with classrooms for math, science, vocational training and basic high school requirements, offer comparable classrooms to all students, and give students access to technology shall Delano Joint Union High School District construct and acquire a new high school in Delano by issuing $27 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit provided that spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and no money goes to administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10549, "fingerprint": "1998|199800099|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800099|KERN", "content_hash": "20b01e166caea5b0", "measure_id": "199800099", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Bear Valley Community Services District be authorized to levy an annual special tax in the amount of $90.00 on each parcel of land within the boundaries of Improvement District No.2 of the District for the purpose of paying principal and interest charges on the 1995 Series A general obligation bonds issued by Improvement District No.2?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 923, "no_votes": 583, "total_votes": 1506, "percent_yes": 61.288180610889775, "percent_no": 38.711819389110225, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.803458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.116308", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bear Valley Community Services District be authorized to levy an annual special tax in the amount of $90.00 on each parcel of land within the boundaries of Improvement District No.2 of the District for the purpose of paying principal and interest charges on the 1995 Series A general obligation bonds issued by Improvement District No.2?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12217, "fingerprint": "1998|199800524|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800524|KERN", "content_hash": "5e7c0ec453480d3d", "measure_id": "199800524", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Wasco Union High School District issue $9.2 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for the repair and rehabilitation of schools and classrooms, the construction of new classrooms and school facilities, and the wiring of classrooms for computers and modem technology, in order to reduce overcrowding, rehabilitate existing classrooms, improve school security for student safety, and give students greater access to classroom computer technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1779, "no_votes": 932, "total_votes": 2711, "percent_yes": 65.62154186646994, "percent_no": 34.37845813353006, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.413716", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.806756", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.118520", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Wasco Union High School District issue $9.2 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for the repair and rehabilitation of schools and classrooms, the construction of new classrooms and school facilities, and the wiring of classrooms for computers and modem technology, in order to reduce overcrowding, rehabilitate existing classrooms, improve school security for student safety, and give students greater access to classroom computer technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12214, "fingerprint": "1998|199800150|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800150|KERN", "content_hash": "ff4ee9cb3de9732c", "measure_id": "199800150", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a special tax of up to $75.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of three fiscal years beginning July 1, 1998?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1583, "no_votes": 486, "total_votes": 2069, "percent_yes": 76.51039149347511, "percent_no": 23.48960850652489, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.411045", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.803725", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.116490", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a special tax of up to $75.00 per lot or parcel be approved for each of three fiscal years beginning July 1, 1998?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10548, "fingerprint": "1998|199800034|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800034|KERN", "content_hash": "a96356e8c03622b6", "measure_id": "199800034", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the South Fork Union School District issue $1.1 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit in order to construct a new gymnasium, build a community center and relocate the South Fork Middle School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 636, "no_votes": 293, "total_votes": 929, "percent_yes": 68.46071044133477, "percent_no": 31.53928955866523, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.803187", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.116121", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the South Fork Union School District issue $1.1 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit in order to construct a new gymnasium, build a community center and relocate the South Fork Middle School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12215, "fingerprint": "1998|199800352|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800352|KERN", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "199800352", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1156, "no_votes": 1043, "total_votes": 2199, "percent_yes": 52.569349704411096, "percent_no": 47.430650295588904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.412784", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.805679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.117777", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10550, "fingerprint": "1998|199800194|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800194|KERN", "content_hash": "63693710e08f6521", "measure_id": "199800194", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Wasco Union High School District issue $9.2 million of bonds at an interest rates below the legal limit for the repair and rehabilitation of schools and classrooms, the construction of new classrooms and school facilities and the wiring of classrooms  for computers and modem technology, in order to reduce over-crowding, rehabilitate existing classrooms, improve school security for student safety, and give students greater access to classroom computer technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1265, "no_votes": 646, "total_votes": 1911, "percent_yes": 66.19570905285191, "percent_no": 33.80429094714809, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.803995", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.116674", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Wasco Union High School District issue $9.2 million of bonds at an interest rates below the legal limit for the repair and rehabilitation of schools and classrooms, the construction of new classrooms and school facilities and the wiring of classrooms  for computers and modem technology, in order to reduce over-crowding, rehabilitate existing classrooms, improve school security for student safety, and give students greater access to classroom computer technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10557, "fingerprint": "1998|199800354|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800354|KERN", "content_hash": "101f417c749d0cea", "measure_id": "199800354", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the 2% increase in the transient occupancy tax adopted by the Tehachapi City Council on June 19, 1995 be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 739, "no_votes": 939, "total_votes": 1678, "percent_yes": 44.04052443384982, "percent_no": 55.95947556615018, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.806212", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.118145", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the 2% increase in the transient occupancy tax adopted by the Tehachapi City Council on June 19, 1995 be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10551, "fingerprint": "1998|199800256|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800256|KERN", "content_hash": "71bd5c6ec15a7b1e", "measure_id": "199800256", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Bear Valley Community Services District be authorized to exercise its powers for the following purpose:  To contract with the United States Postal Service for mail delivery services to the District and its inhabitants, including but limited to leasing space in any public building to the United States Postal Service, a nonprofit corporation, or a private entity for mail delivery and packaging?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1323, "no_votes": 607, "total_votes": 1930, "percent_yes": 68.54922279792746, "percent_no": 31.450777202072544, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.804262", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.116859", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bear Valley Community Services District be authorized to exercise its powers for the following purpose:  To contract with the United States Postal Service for mail delivery services to the District and its inhabitants, including but limited to leasing space in any public building to the United States Postal Service, a nonprofit corporation, or a private entity for mail delivery and packaging?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10552, "fingerprint": "1998|199800257|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800257|KERN", "content_hash": "9bb572061c14a6d1", "measure_id": "199800257", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Bear Valley Community Services District be authorized to exercise its powers for the following purpose: Adopt and enforce by ordinance by ordinance measure for the abatement, control, and removal of weeds on property within the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1212, "no_votes": 715, "total_votes": 1927, "percent_yes": 62.895692786715095, "percent_no": 37.104307213284905, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.804592", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.117043", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bear Valley Community Services District be authorized to exercise its powers for the following purpose: Adopt and enforce by ordinance by ordinance measure for the abatement, control, and removal of weeds on property within the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10553, "fingerprint": "1998|199800258|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800258|KERN", "content_hash": "15f01c578e0b37e9", "measure_id": "199800258", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Rosamond Community Services District exercise the powers granted to it under the Community Services District Law for the purpose of public recreation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1419, "no_votes": 1043, "total_votes": 2462, "percent_yes": 57.63606823720553, "percent_no": 42.36393176279447, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.804865", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.117225", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Rosamond Community Services District exercise the powers granted to it under the Community Services District Law for the purpose of public recreation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10554, "fingerprint": "1998|199800259|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800259|KERN", "content_hash": "34d695433cb8f311", "measure_id": "199800259", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "If Measure G is approved to allow the Rosamond Community Services District to exercise the powers granted to it under the Community Services District Law for the purpose of public recreation, shall Ordinance No. 99-2 of the Rosamond Community Services District be adopted and approved to establish and authorize the levying of a special tax in the amount of $5.00 to $45.00 per parcel per fiscal year to finance public recreation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1032, "no_votes": 1421, "total_votes": 2453, "percent_yes": 42.07093355075418, "percent_no": 57.92906644924582, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.805137", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.117409", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If Measure G is approved to allow the Rosamond Community Services District to exercise the powers granted to it under the Community Services District Law for the purpose of public recreation, shall Ordinance No. 99-2 of the Rosamond Community Services District be adopted and approved to establish and authorize the levying of a special tax in the amount of $5.00 to $45.00 per parcel per fiscal year to finance public recreation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10555, "fingerprint": "1998|199800260|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800260|KERN", "content_hash": "70907d390d05339d", "measure_id": "199800260", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Rosamond Community Services District exercise the powers granted to it under the Community Services District Law for the purpose of abating graffiti?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1359, "no_votes": 1020, "total_votes": 2379, "percent_yes": 57.12484237074401, "percent_no": 42.87515762925599, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.805405", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.117594", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Rosamond Community Services District exercise the powers granted to it under the Community Services District Law for the purpose of abating graffiti?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10556, "fingerprint": "1998|199800353|KERN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800353|KERN", "content_hash": "72cc0068ee2acc99", "measure_id": "199800353", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kern", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Ridgecrest be authorized to levy a General Tax at the rate of 2% on utility sales to retail customers for a term of two years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1692, "no_votes": 6396, "total_votes": 8088, "percent_yes": 20.91988130563798, "percent_no": 79.08011869436203, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.805947", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.117962", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Ridgecrest be authorized to levy a General Tax at the rate of 2% on utility sales to retail customers for a term of two years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kern_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Kern County Elections", "url": "https://elections.kerncounty.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10560, "fingerprint": "1998|199800195|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800195|KINGS", "content_hash": "10c10c27f34f40b3", "measure_id": "199800195", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District sell bonds to repair and renovate old classrooms to reduce student overcrowding; provide science labs and classrooms; re-wire and upgrade classrooms to accommodate computer technology; expand and upgrade the library; and add classrooms for vocational and agricultural education and other permanent school improvements at the high school in an amount not exceeding $10,100,000 at an interest rate not exceeding the maximum allowed by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108, "no_votes": 82, "total_votes": 190, "percent_yes": 56.84210526315789, "percent_no": 43.15789473684211, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.807637", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.119078", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District sell bonds to repair and renovate old classrooms to reduce student overcrowding; provide science labs and classrooms; re-wire and upgrade classrooms to accommodate computer technology; expand and upgrade the library; and add classrooms for vocational and agricultural education and other permanent school improvements at the high school in an amount not exceeding $10,100,000 at an interest rate not exceeding the maximum allowed by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12219, "fingerprint": "1998|199800526|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800526|KINGS", "content_hash": "b055e1ac354211aa", "measure_id": "199800526", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To give students greater access to computer technology, build new academic and vocational classrooms, provide students with improved education and job training opportunities, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $19 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4397, "no_votes": 1905, "total_votes": 6302, "percent_yes": 69.77150111075849, "percent_no": 30.228498889241507, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.416470", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.809608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.120294", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To give students greater access to computer technology, build new academic and vocational classrooms, provide students with improved education and job training opportunities, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $19 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10564, "fingerprint": "1998|199800199|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800199|KINGS", "content_hash": "9614d549b476a4cf", "measure_id": "199800199", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To give students greater access to computer technology, build new academic and vocational classrooms, provide students with improved educational and job training opportunities, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $19 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3377, "no_votes": 1553, "total_votes": 4930, "percent_yes": 68.49898580121703, "percent_no": 31.50101419878297, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.808763", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.119928", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To give students greater access to computer technology, build new academic and vocational classrooms, provide students with improved educational and job training opportunities, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $19 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10558, "fingerprint": "1998|199800035|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800035|KINGS", "content_hash": "b5550e92a418d218", "measure_id": "199800035", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Hanford Elementary School District issue bonds, in an amount not to exceed $7,350,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit, for the acquisition and construction of a new elementary school, the upgrade of classrooms for computer technology to insure internet access, and safety improvements to existing school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3011, "no_votes": 1441, "total_votes": 4452, "percent_yes": 67.63252470799641, "percent_no": 32.36747529200359, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.807051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.118706", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Hanford Elementary School District issue bonds, in an amount not to exceed $7,350,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory limit, for the acquisition and construction of a new elementary school, the upgrade of classrooms for computer technology to insure internet access, and safety improvements to existing school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12218, "fingerprint": "1998|199800525|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800525|KINGS", "content_hash": "2450b0931ff81015", "measure_id": "199800525", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Pioneer Union Elementary School District issue bonds for the purposes of acquiring land, constructing a new comprehensive middle school, including modern band, science, technology, and gymnasium facilities, modernizing current school facilities and providing facilities for future growth in the total amount of $5 million at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1087, "no_votes": 622, "total_votes": 1709, "percent_yes": 63.60444704505559, "percent_no": 36.39555295494441, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.416116", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.809274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.120114", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pioneer Union Elementary School District issue bonds for the purposes of acquiring land, constructing a new comprehensive middle school, including modern band, science, technology, and gymnasium facilities, modernizing current school facilities and providing facilities for future growth in the total amount of $5 million at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10561, "fingerprint": "1998|199800196|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800196|KINGS", "content_hash": "2450b0931ff81015", "measure_id": "199800196", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Pioneer Union Elementary School District issue bonds for the purposes of acquiring land, constructing a new comprehensive middle school, including modern band, science, technology, and gymnasium facilities, modernizing current school facilities and providing facilities for future growth in the total amount of $5 million at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 852, "no_votes": 484, "total_votes": 1336, "percent_yes": 63.77245508982036, "percent_no": 36.22754491017964, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.807904", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.119265", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Pioneer Union Elementary School District issue bonds for the purposes of acquiring land, constructing a new comprehensive middle school, including modern band, science, technology, and gymnasium facilities, modernizing current school facilities and providing facilities for future growth in the total amount of $5 million at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10562, "fingerprint": "1998|199800197|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800197|KINGS", "content_hash": "29efcb221108325a", "measure_id": "199800197", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Reef-Sunset Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $ 2,400,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the legal rate for the purpose of taking advantage of today's lower rates to refund and pay off the outstanding bonds of the District? The measure shall not be effective unless Measure S also passes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 493, "no_votes": 148, "total_votes": 641, "percent_yes": 76.91107644305772, "percent_no": 23.088923556942277, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.808172", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.119446", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Reef-Sunset Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $ 2,400,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the legal rate for the purpose of taking advantage of today's lower rates to refund and pay off the outstanding bonds of the District? The measure shall not be effective unless Measure S also passes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10563, "fingerprint": "1998|199800198|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800198|KINGS", "content_hash": "ad22434a95d58bec", "measure_id": "199800198", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, upgrade classrooms throughout the district, allow the district to receive state matching funds, acquire land and buildings, renovate, construct, and modernize school facilities, shall the Reef-Sunset Unified School District incur bond indebtedness in the principal amount of $7,600,000 with the interest rate not to exceed the amount allowable by law? This measure will not be effective unless Measure R also passes.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 494, "no_votes": 149, "total_votes": 643, "percent_yes": 76.82737169517885, "percent_no": 23.172628304821146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.808493", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.119727", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, upgrade classrooms throughout the district, allow the district to receive state matching funds, acquire land and buildings, renovate, construct, and modernize school facilities, shall the Reef-Sunset Unified School District incur bond indebtedness in the principal amount of $7,600,000 with the interest rate not to exceed the amount allowable by law? This measure will not be effective unless Measure R also passes.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10559, "fingerprint": "1998|199800036|KINGS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800036|KINGS", "content_hash": "e68a0002b9124f40", "measure_id": "199800036", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Kings", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair and upgrade local area schools; replace worn-out and deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewer, lighting, heating and electrical systems; renovate, construct and acquire classrooms, bathrooms, sites and school facilities to reduce overcrowding due to increased student enrollment; upgrade classrooms for computer technology; with no money for administrators; shall Hanford Joint Union High School District issue $18 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4166, "no_votes": 1882, "total_votes": 6048, "percent_yes": 68.88227513227513, "percent_no": 31.117724867724874, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.807370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.118890", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair and upgrade local area schools; replace worn-out and deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewer, lighting, heating and electrical systems; renovate, construct and acquire classrooms, bathrooms, sites and school facilities to reduce overcrowding due to increased student enrollment; upgrade classrooms for computer technology; with no money for administrators; shall Hanford Joint Union High School District issue $18 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Kings_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10565, "fingerprint": "1998|199800355|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800355|LAKE", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "199800355", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 808, "no_votes": 639, "total_votes": 1447, "percent_yes": 55.83966827919834, "percent_no": 44.16033172080166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.809892", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.120476", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10566, "fingerprint": "1998|199800356|LAKE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800356|LAKE", "content_hash": "a89f2756de6dfb74", "measure_id": "199800356", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Lake", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted (1) to impose a Transactions (Sales) and Use Tax at a maximum rate of three quarters (3/4) of one percent to be used exclusively for the repair, replacement, construction or reconstruction of the City\u2019s streets and roads systems; (2) to increase the City\u2019s spending limit so that monies collected can be used for the repair, replacement, construction or reconstruction of the City\u2019s streets and roads systems; (3) which automatically expires ten years from adoption?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 899, "no_votes": 599, "total_votes": 1498, "percent_yes": 60.01335113484646, "percent_no": 39.98664886515354, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.810182", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.120660", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted (1) to impose a Transactions (Sales) and Use Tax at a maximum rate of three quarters (3/4) of one percent to be used exclusively for the repair, replacement, construction or reconstruction of the City\u2019s streets and roads systems; (2) to increase the City\u2019s spending limit so that monies collected can be used for the repair, replacement, construction or reconstruction of the City\u2019s streets and roads systems; (3) which automatically expires ten years from adoption?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lake_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10567, "fingerprint": "1998|199800151|LASSEN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800151|LASSEN", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "199800151", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Lassen", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 681, "no_votes": 1383, "total_votes": 2064, "percent_yes": 32.99418604651162, "percent_no": 67.00581395348837, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.810457", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.120857", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Lassen_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10575, "fingerprint": "1998|199800080|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800080|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f7d4d32011d57874", "measure_id": "199800080", "measure_letter": "98-1", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Parking Tax from 5% to 10% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2069, "no_votes": 1438, "total_votes": 3507, "percent_yes": 58.996293128029656, "percent_no": 41.003706871970344, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-28", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.812874", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.122380", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Parking Tax from 5% to 10% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10576, "fingerprint": "1998|199800081|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800081|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "d71a09ac01928995", "measure_id": "199800081", "measure_letter": "98-2", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax from 12% to 14% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2129, "no_votes": 1372, "total_votes": 3501, "percent_yes": 60.811196800914026, "percent_no": 39.188803199085974, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-28", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.813150", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.122563", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax from 12% to 14% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10577, "fingerprint": "1998|199800082|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800082|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "bec2e031ec4f6440", "measure_id": "199800082", "measure_letter": "98-3", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance establishing a graduated admissions tax be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2104, "no_votes": 1387, "total_votes": 3491, "percent_yes": 60.26926382125466, "percent_no": 39.73073617874534, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-28", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.813414", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.122745", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance establishing a graduated admissions tax be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12220, "fingerprint": "1998|199800200|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800200|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dce2c6e70605b959", "measure_id": "199800200", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities to reduce student overcrowding, repair leaky classroom roofs, build permanent classrooms, repair and upgrade schools throughout the District, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Lennox School District be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed $10 million with the interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1417, "no_votes": 234, "total_votes": 1651, "percent_yes": 85.8267716535433, "percent_no": 14.173228346456696, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.420690", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.813681", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.122925", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities to reduce student overcrowding, repair leaky classroom roofs, build permanent classrooms, repair and upgrade schools throughout the District, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Lennox School District be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed $10 million with the interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10568, "fingerprint": "1998|199800037|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800037|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cbdc8dcd70a186dc", "measure_id": "199800037", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities for Compton children and to improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood schools, including replacing deteriorating roofs, electrical heating, plumbing and security systems, complying with fire and safety standards, reducing earthquake danger and other hazards, shall the Compton Unified School District issue $107 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, repair, rehabilitate, construct and modernize classrooms and school facilities with all proceeds staying in Compton to benefit local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2793, "no_votes": 2287, "total_votes": 5080, "percent_yes": 54.98031496062992, "percent_no": 45.01968503937008, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.810730", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.121048", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities for Compton children and to improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood schools, including replacing deteriorating roofs, electrical heating, plumbing and security systems, complying with fire and safety standards, reducing earthquake danger and other hazards, shall the Compton Unified School District issue $107 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, repair, rehabilitate, construct and modernize classrooms and school facilities with all proceeds staying in Compton to benefit local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12227, "fingerprint": "1998|199800530|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800530|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5f38ee714da10925", "measure_id": "199800530", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of schools, including replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and sewer  systems, eliminating hazards from asbestos, reducing dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades, providing adequate classrooms for children, and acquiring, constructing, and modernizing local school facilities to relieve overcrowding, shall the San Gabriel Unified School District issue $53 million of bonds, at an interest rates within the legal limit with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5287, "no_votes": 3068, "total_votes": 8355, "percent_yes": 63.27947336923998, "percent_no": 36.72052663076002, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.429081", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.822605", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.128652", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of schools, including replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and sewer  systems, eliminating hazards from asbestos, reducing dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades, providing adequate classrooms for children, and acquiring, constructing, and modernizing local school facilities to relieve overcrowding, shall the San Gabriel Unified School District issue $53 million of bonds, at an interest rates within the legal limit with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10573, "fingerprint": "1998|199800042|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800042|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4dca727173bff0ad", "measure_id": "199800042", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Temple City Unified School District repair its existing schools, upgrade deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, cooling, ventilation, and electrical systems, rewire classrooms for computer technology, renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms to comply with current fire safety, fire and federal disability access standards, and reduce classroom overcrowding, by issuing $24 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3124, "no_votes": 1148, "total_votes": 4272, "percent_yes": 73.12734082397003, "percent_no": 26.87265917602997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.812285", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.122005", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Temple City Unified School District repair its existing schools, upgrade deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, cooling, ventilation, and electrical systems, rewire classrooms for computer technology, renovate, construct, and acquire classrooms to comply with current fire safety, fire and federal disability access standards, and reduce classroom overcrowding, by issuing $24 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12221, "fingerprint": "1998|199800201|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800201|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "60c20fc9954e2896", "measure_id": "199800201", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct additional classrooms to reduce overcrowding, upgrade math and science labs, rehabilitate existing classrooms, improve school security for student safety, and give students greater access to classroom computer technology, shall the Pomona Unified School District issue $50 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for the repair and rehabilitation of schools, the construction acquisition of new classrooms and school facilities, and the wiring of classrooms for computers and modern technology.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11104, "no_votes": 4791, "total_votes": 15895, "percent_yes": 69.85844605221769, "percent_no": 30.141553947782313, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.420890", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.813964", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.123106", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct additional classrooms to reduce overcrowding, upgrade math and science labs, rehabilitate existing classrooms, improve school security for student safety, and give students greater access to classroom computer technology, shall the Pomona Unified School District issue $50 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit for the repair and rehabilitation of schools, the construction acquisition of new classrooms and school facilities, and the wiring of classrooms for computers and modern technology.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10569, "fingerprint": "1998|199800038|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800038|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cbbb6ae2ebf2e209", "measure_id": "199800038", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of schools, including replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, eliminating hazards from asbestos, reducing dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades, providing adequate classrooms for children, and acquiring, constructing, and modernizing local school facilities to relieve overcrowding, shall the Duarte Unified School District issue $44,000,000 of bonds, at an interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1981, "no_votes": 635, "total_votes": 2616, "percent_yes": 75.7262996941896, "percent_no": 24.273700305810394, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.811123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.121233", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of schools, including replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, eliminating hazards from asbestos, reducing dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades, providing adequate classrooms for children, and acquiring, constructing, and modernizing local school facilities to relieve overcrowding, shall the Duarte Unified School District issue $44,000,000 of bonds, at an interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10599, "fingerprint": "1998|199800527|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800527|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "cbdc8dcd70a186dc", "measure_id": "199800527", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve educational opportunities for Compton children and to improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood schools, including replacing deteriorating roofs, electrical heating, plumbing and security systems, complying with fire and safety standards, reducing earthquake danger and other hazards, shall the Compton Unified School District issue $107 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, repair, rehabilitate, construct and modernize classrooms and school facilities with all proceeds staying in Compton to benefit local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14132, "no_votes": 7232, "total_votes": 21364, "percent_yes": 66.14866129938214, "percent_no": 33.85133870061786, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.821726", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.128096", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve educational opportunities for Compton children and to improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood schools, including replacing deteriorating roofs, electrical heating, plumbing and security systems, complying with fire and safety standards, reducing earthquake danger and other hazards, shall the Compton Unified School District issue $107 million of bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, repair, rehabilitate, construct and modernize classrooms and school facilities with all proceeds staying in Compton to benefit local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10580, "fingerprint": "1998|199800362|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800362|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "17840c277d14ce8c", "measure_id": "199800362", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve safety for zoo visitors and provide more humane conditions for animals; repair deteriorated electrical, plumbing, drainage and sewer systems; replace decayed wooden structures, upgrade animal enclosures creating more natural environments; with an oversight committee to ensure that no money is spent for administrators\u2019 salaries; shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness not to exceed $47,600,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 511245, "no_votes": 134622, "total_votes": 645867, "percent_yes": 79.15638978303583, "percent_no": 20.843610216964166, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.815596", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.124201", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety for zoo visitors and provide more humane conditions for animals; repair deteriorated electrical, plumbing, drainage and sewer systems; replace decayed wooden structures, upgrade animal enclosures creating more natural environments; with an oversight committee to ensure that no money is spent for administrators\u2019 salaries; shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness not to exceed $47,600,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12222, "fingerprint": "1998|199800358|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800358|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e2ad76e758c448f1", "measure_id": "199800358", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall various provisions of the Inglewood City Charter be amended in order to more explicitly set forth the power of the City to equip and maintain a full and complete fire and police department, and establish the method by which the City may transfer or consolidate its public safety functions with a state, county or city government?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11011, "no_votes": 9616, "total_votes": 20627, "percent_yes": 53.38149027973045, "percent_no": 46.61850972026955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.421290", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.814512", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.123474", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall various provisions of the Inglewood City Charter be amended in order to more explicitly set forth the power of the City to equip and maintain a full and complete fire and police department, and establish the method by which the City may transfer or consolidate its public safety functions with a state, county or city government?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10578, "fingerprint": "1998|199800357|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800357|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "959d324b1c4591bf", "measure_id": "199800357", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended in order to repeal the authority of the City to maintain its own fire department and to direct the City Council to take all steps necessary to transfer fire protection and emergency medical services to the County of Los Angeles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11011, "no_votes": 9616, "total_votes": 20627, "percent_yes": 53.38149027973045, "percent_no": 46.61850972026955, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.814242", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.123289", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Inglewood City Charter be amended in order to repeal the authority of the City to maintain its own fire department and to direct the City Council to take all steps necessary to transfer fire protection and emergency medical services to the County of Los Angeles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10581, "fingerprint": "1998|199800363|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800363|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "51c9179d12a4f17a", "measure_id": "199800363", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness not to exceed $178,300,000 for acquisition, improvement, construction and rehabilitation of branch library facilities located throughout the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 450644, "no_votes": 177760, "total_votes": 628404, "percent_yes": 71.71246522937473, "percent_no": 28.28753477062527, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.815951", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.124390", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness not to exceed $178,300,000 for acquisition, improvement, construction and rehabilitation of branch library facilities located throughout the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12223, "fingerprint": "1998|199800359|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800359|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "faa6deb9c076020d", "measure_id": "199800359", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Inglewood City Charger be amended in order to repeal the authority of the City to maintain its own fire department and to direct the City Council to take all steps necessary to transfer fire protection and emergency medical services to the County of Los Angeles?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10314, "no_votes": 8760, "total_votes": 19074, "percent_yes": 54.07360805284681, "percent_no": 45.92639194715319, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.421489", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.814780", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.123655", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Inglewood City Charger be amended in order to repeal the authority of the City to maintain its own fire department and to direct the City Council to take all steps necessary to transfer fire protection and emergency medical services to the County of Los Angeles?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10571, "fingerprint": "1998|199800040|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800040|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "f26cd91b001e32ff", "measure_id": "199800040", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Paramount Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $35,000,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law in order to build schools, air condition existing schools, repair and replace plumbing, wiring, and security systems, provide permanent classrooms for Class-Size Reduction, and to provide  computers, science, and technology laboratories at schools throughout the District so long as no bond monies are used for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3330, "no_votes": 1001, "total_votes": 4331, "percent_yes": 76.88755483722004, "percent_no": 23.112445162779963, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.811669", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.121599", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Paramount Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $35,000,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law in order to build schools, air condition existing schools, repair and replace plumbing, wiring, and security systems, provide permanent classrooms for Class-Size Reduction, and to provide  computers, science, and technology laboratories at schools throughout the District so long as no bond monies are used for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12225, "fingerprint": "1998|199800364|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800364|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "68a90b6196413f10", "measure_id": "199800364", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness not to exceed $46,500,000 in Exposition Park to rehabilitate the Rose Garden and improve, construct and expand the Olympic Swim Stadium Regional Recreational Center and, subject to securing matching public and or private funds, the Environmental Science Learning Center and museums; provided that parking built under this measure be limited to people using these facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 364891, "no_votes": 246294, "total_votes": 611185, "percent_yes": 59.70221782275416, "percent_no": 40.29778217724584, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.422680", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.816222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.124575", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Los Angeles incur bonded indebtedness not to exceed $46,500,000 in Exposition Park to rehabilitate the Rose Garden and improve, construct and expand the Olympic Swim Stadium Regional Recreational Center and, subject to securing matching public and or private funds, the Environmental Science Learning Center and museums; provided that parking built under this measure be limited to people using these facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10570, "fingerprint": "1998|199800039|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800039|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "123e9438bfc33344", "measure_id": "199800039", "measure_letter": "EE", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to raise funds for school modernization and districtwide projects such as structural repair and improvements to existing schools; upgrading lighting, heating, plumbing and electrical systems, including for computer technology; safety and security improvements, including for seismic safety; replacing deteriorated roofs; and constructing new classrooms, libraries, and schools; shall the Montebello Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $92,000,000 of bonds for acquisition and improvement of real property at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5301, "no_votes": 1856, "total_votes": 7157, "percent_yes": 74.06734665362582, "percent_no": 25.93265334637418, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.811399", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.121416", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to raise funds for school modernization and districtwide projects such as structural repair and improvements to existing schools; upgrading lighting, heating, plumbing and electrical systems, including for computer technology; safety and security improvements, including for seismic safety; replacing deteriorated roofs; and constructing new classrooms, libraries, and schools; shall the Montebello Unified School District be authorized to issue up to $92,000,000 of bonds for acquisition and improvement of real property at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10579, "fingerprint": "1998|199800360|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800360|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "928fae6b3d041e78", "measure_id": "199800360", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City complete, adopt and proceed with the draft redevelopment plan which includes commercial revitalization and housing rehabilitation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2323, "no_votes": 2425, "total_votes": 4748, "percent_yes": 48.92586352148273, "percent_no": 51.07413647851727, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.815049", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.123841", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City complete, adopt and proceed with the draft redevelopment plan which includes commercial revitalization and housing rehabilitation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10582, "fingerprint": "1998|199800365|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800365|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ca76f0ce4450f5a7", "measure_id": "199800365", "measure_letter": "FF", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to authorize the City Council to establish pension benefits by ordinance for (1) sworn personnel hired in connection with a merger or contract for fire or police services in order to facilitate the transfer of such employees to  the Fire or Police Department and (2) domestic partners of sworn fire and police personnel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 353740, "no_votes": 240827, "total_votes": 594567, "percent_yes": 59.49539749094719, "percent_no": 40.50460250905281, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.816506", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.124757", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to authorize the City Council to establish pension benefits by ordinance for (1) sworn personnel hired in connection with a merger or contract for fire or police services in order to facilitate the transfer of such employees to  the Fire or Police Department and (2) domestic partners of sworn fire and police personnel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12224, "fingerprint": "1998|199800361|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800361|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "36580dc8b7a5384f", "measure_id": "199800361", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to validate and re-enact existing ordinances which: (a) adjusted the business license tax for inflation, (b) increased business license tax rates, and (c) applied the business license tax to franchises and utilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2316, "no_votes": 2292, "total_votes": 4608, "percent_yes": 50.26041666666666, "percent_no": 49.73958333333334, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.421889", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.815320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.124020", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to validate and re-enact existing ordinances which: (a) adjusted the business license tax for inflation, (b) increased business license tax rates, and (c) applied the business license tax to franchises and utilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10574, "fingerprint": "1998|199800043|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800043|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "48d590a24f950fdc", "measure_id": "199800043", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds to modernize, replace, acquire and construct school sites and facilities; to improve health and safety conditions of Torrance schools; to replace inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating/ventilation systems, deteriorating roofs, restrooms, plumbing and sewer systems; to eliminate hazards from earthquakes and asbestos; to upgrade wiring for emergency communications, fire alarms and technology, shall the Torrance Unified School District issue $80.5 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14300, "no_votes": 7977, "total_votes": 22277, "percent_yes": 64.19176729362123, "percent_no": 35.808232706378774, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.812558", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.122191", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds to modernize, replace, acquire and construct school sites and facilities; to improve health and safety conditions of Torrance schools; to replace inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating/ventilation systems, deteriorating roofs, restrooms, plumbing and sewer systems; to eliminate hazards from earthquakes and asbestos; to upgrade wiring for emergency communications, fire alarms and technology, shall the Torrance Unified School District issue $80.5 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10583, "fingerprint": "1998|199800366|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800366|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6a3c1c2e44a7a3d5", "measure_id": "199800366", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to permit the council to direct the Civil Service Commission to establish and apply qualifications for employment to employees of other governmental entities when considering consolidation of that entity\u2019s function into the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 367886, "no_votes": 201981, "total_votes": 569867, "percent_yes": 64.55646668433161, "percent_no": 35.44353331566839, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.816786", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.124938", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to permit the council to direct the Civil Service Commission to establish and apply qualifications for employment to employees of other governmental entities when considering consolidation of that entity\u2019s function into the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10595, "fingerprint": "1998|199800379|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800379|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "4282935f144b05ff", "measure_id": "199800379", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 098-1126 continuing the Special Public Safety Tax for police, paramedic, and fire services be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4072, "no_votes": 625, "total_votes": 4697, "percent_yes": 86.69363423461785, "percent_no": 13.306365765382154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.820627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.127357", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 098-1126 continuing the Special Public Safety Tax for police, paramedic, and fire services be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10584, "fingerprint": "1998|199800367|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800367|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "2d002a5b30f276b9", "measure_id": "199800367", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to permit the Mayor and the Council by a 2/3 vote, to transfer functions of certain departments in the City which control their own funds to other City Departments?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 266674, "no_votes": 300482, "total_votes": 567156, "percent_yes": 47.01951491300453, "percent_no": 52.98048508699547, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.817060", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.125129", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to permit the Mayor and the Council by a 2/3 vote, to transfer functions of certain departments in the City which control their own funds to other City Departments?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10596, "fingerprint": "1998|199800380|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800380|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "b0a60dbe9af86f76", "measure_id": "199800380", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Article XXI be added to the City Charter authorizing the City to annually develop, construct, or acquire housing units affordable to low income persons, including but not limited to senior citizens, that do not exceed in number one-half of one percent (1/2 of 1%) of the total number of housing units that existed in the City the immediately preceding year, with any unused authorization to be carried over for a period not to exceed three (3) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14276, "no_votes": 12672, "total_votes": 26948, "percent_yes": 52.976102122606505, "percent_no": 47.023897877393495, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.820910", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.127536", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article XXI be added to the City Charter authorizing the City to annually develop, construct, or acquire housing units affordable to low income persons, including but not limited to senior citizens, that do not exceed in number one-half of one percent (1/2 of 1%) of the total number of housing units that existed in the City the immediately preceding year, with any unused authorization to be carried over for a period not to exceed three (3) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10585, "fingerprint": "1998|199800368|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800368|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3577312f7b6b9d9a", "measure_id": "199800368", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow certain members of the Safety Members Pension Plan II the election to be a Plan Member as provided under the Safety Members Pension Plan II?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 316339, "no_votes": 237551, "total_votes": 553890, "percent_yes": 57.11224250302407, "percent_no": 42.88775749697593, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.817329", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.125311", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to allow certain members of the Safety Members Pension Plan II the election to be a Plan Member as provided under the Safety Members Pension Plan II?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10597, "fingerprint": "1998|199800381|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800381|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a09524a2946f8945", "measure_id": "199800381", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 602 of the Santa Monica City Charter be amended to provide for Councilmembers compensation in the amount of $750 each month, for Mayor\u2019s compensation of $900 each month, to provide for yearly cost of living increases equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index, and to provide for medical and other benefits that the City customarily provides to City employees?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15943, "no_votes": 10534, "total_votes": 26477, "percent_yes": 60.21452581485818, "percent_no": 39.78547418514182, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.821188", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.127721", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 602 of the Santa Monica City Charter be amended to provide for Councilmembers compensation in the amount of $750 each month, for Mayor\u2019s compensation of $900 each month, to provide for yearly cost of living increases equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index, and to provide for medical and other benefits that the City customarily provides to City employees?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10586, "fingerprint": "1998|199800369|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800369|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "def57df085a0e475", "measure_id": "199800369", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance levying a real property related 20 year special tax of $769,400,000 plus inflation for public sidewalk improvements needed to comply with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act and general public sidewalk repairs throughout the City of Los Angeles be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 252562, "no_votes": 333343, "total_votes": 585905, "percent_yes": 43.10630562975226, "percent_no": 56.89369437024774, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.817600", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.125496", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance levying a real property related 20 year special tax of $769,400,000 plus inflation for public sidewalk improvements needed to comply with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act and general public sidewalk repairs throughout the City of Los Angeles be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10600, "fingerprint": "1998|199800528|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800528|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5ee5f738db128425", "measure_id": "199800528", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve safety conditions of neighborhood schools and improve instruction for students, including repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, reducing dangers from earthquakes, replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating systems, providing adequate classrooms, science facilities, computer labs, and constructing school classrooms and facilities to relieve overcrowding and can provide for after school programs, shall Inglewood USD issue $131,000,000 of bonds, at an interest rate within legal limits?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20638, "no_votes": 3107, "total_votes": 23745, "percent_yes": 86.91514002947989, "percent_no": 13.084859970520114, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.822069", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.128282", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve safety conditions of neighborhood schools and improve instruction for students, including repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, reducing dangers from earthquakes, replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating systems, providing adequate classrooms, science facilities, computer labs, and constructing school classrooms and facilities to relieve overcrowding and can provide for after school programs, shall Inglewood USD issue $131,000,000 of bonds, at an interest rate within legal limits?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10598, "fingerprint": "1998|199800382|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800382|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ceeab8e55dfff591", "measure_id": "199800382", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To construct, improve and remodel the Main and branch libraries and related facilities, shall the City of Santa Monica incur general obligation bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of not to exceed $25 million?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22446, "no_votes": 5117, "total_votes": 27563, "percent_yes": 81.43525741029642, "percent_no": 18.564742589703584, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.821456", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.127911", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, improve and remodel the Main and branch libraries and related facilities, shall the City of Santa Monica incur general obligation bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of not to exceed $25 million?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10587, "fingerprint": "1998|199800370|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800370|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e1a3e94132217f5f", "measure_id": "199800370", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Mayor be elected for a four year term directly by the voters city-wide as the eighth member of City Council, having all the powers of a member of City Council and of the Mayor as presently contained in the City Charter, and additionally, the duty of present an annual thematic budget message to City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 25038, "no_votes": 8033, "total_votes": 33071, "percent_yes": 75.7098364125669, "percent_no": 24.2901635874331, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.817953", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.125677", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mayor be elected for a four year term directly by the voters city-wide as the eighth member of City Council, having all the powers of a member of City Council and of the Mayor as presently contained in the City Charter, and additionally, the duty of present an annual thematic budget message to City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10588, "fingerprint": "1998|199800371|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800371|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "ea19b8970b47b432", "measure_id": "199800371", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If Charter Amendment M receives a majority vote of the electorate voting on the question, when shall the first election of  Mayor directly elected by voters city-wide take place? (Vote for March 1999 <yes> ; OR March 2001 <no>).", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16708, "no_votes": 14145, "total_votes": 30853, "percent_yes": 54.15356691407642, "percent_no": 45.84643308592358, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.818222", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.125863", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If Charter Amendment M receives a majority vote of the electorate voting on the question, when shall the first election of  Mayor directly elected by voters city-wide take place? (Vote for March 1999 <yes> ; OR March 2001 <no>).", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10589, "fingerprint": "1998|199800372|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800372|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "017d5053f158e61d", "measure_id": "199800372", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the compensation of the Mayor and City Council be set by a committee, appointed by the City Council by ordinance with the power to recommend to City Council not more than once every two years the appropriate amount of compensation?  The City Council may accept, reject or modify the recommendation of the committee, but may not increase the compensation above the level recommended by the committee without voter approval.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14928, "no_votes": 14734, "total_votes": 29662, "percent_yes": 50.32701773312655, "percent_no": 49.67298226687345, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.818497", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.126045", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the compensation of the Mayor and City Council be set by a committee, appointed by the City Council by ordinance with the power to recommend to City Council not more than once every two years the appropriate amount of compensation?  The City Council may accept, reject or modify the recommendation of the committee, but may not increase the compensation above the level recommended by the committee without voter approval.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10590, "fingerprint": "1998|199800373|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800373|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "5313643242cd91f0", "measure_id": "199800373", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Mayor and City Council?s compensation continue to be fixed in the City Charter but with a revised stipend of $250 per meeting attended, up to $1,000 per month for Councilmembers, and a stipend of 150% of the Councilmember?s rate for the Mayor, these stipends to be subject to one revision annually by the unanimous vote of the City Council up to the amount of any increase in the consumer price index?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12038, "no_votes": 19057, "total_votes": 31095, "percent_yes": 38.71361955298279, "percent_no": 61.28638044701721, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.818773", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.126229", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mayor and City Council?s compensation continue to be fixed in the City Charter but with a revised stipend of $250 per meeting attended, up to $1,000 per month for Councilmembers, and a stipend of 150% of the Councilmember?s rate for the Mayor, these stipends to be subject to one revision annually by the unanimous vote of the City Council up to the amount of any increase in the consumer price index?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10591, "fingerprint": "1998|199800374|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800374|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "3672ec0a62f0ff12", "measure_id": "199800374", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter be amended to permit, rather than to require, that the City operate its water and power utilities through a department of City government, and to permit the operation of the utility through any other form of organization approved by ordinance, with the requirement that the voters must approve any sales of the utilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17703, "no_votes": 13811, "total_votes": 31514, "percent_yes": 56.1750333185251, "percent_no": 43.8249666814749, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.819040", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.126417", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter be amended to permit, rather than to require, that the City operate its water and power utilities through a department of City government, and to permit the operation of the utility through any other form of organization approved by ordinance, with the requirement that the voters must approve any sales of the utilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10603, "fingerprint": "1998|199800532|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800532|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "a95d90da3af09d59", "measure_id": "199800532", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of Torrance schools, including replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating ventilation systems, replacing fire alarms, plumbing and sewer systems, elimination of hazards from earthquakes and asbestos, upgrading wiring for emergency communication and technology, renovating restrooms, and acquiring, replacing, constructing, renovating, and upgrading classrooms, and other school buildings and facilities, shall the Torrance Unified School District issue $42.5 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29413, "no_votes": 12702, "total_votes": 42115, "percent_yes": 69.83972456369465, "percent_no": 30.160275436305355, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.823149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.129025", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of Torrance schools, including replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating ventilation systems, replacing fire alarms, plumbing and sewer systems, elimination of hazards from earthquakes and asbestos, upgrading wiring for emergency communication and technology, renovating restrooms, and acquiring, replacing, constructing, renovating, and upgrading classrooms, and other school buildings and facilities, shall the Torrance Unified School District issue $42.5 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10601, "fingerprint": "1998|199800529|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800529|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "e5590dddb21100b8", "measure_id": "199800529", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Lawndale Elementary School District issue $26 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit to wire classrooms to provide students with access to computers and technology, repair and replace outdated plumbing, heating and electrical systems, repair leaky roofs, construct and acquire new permanent classrooms and facilities, provide classroom handicapped access, install safety glass to meet earthquake safety codes, and repair and upgrade schools throughout the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4952, "no_votes": 1789, "total_votes": 6741, "percent_yes": 73.46091084408842, "percent_no": 26.539089155911583, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.822337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.128466", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Lawndale Elementary School District issue $26 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit to wire classrooms to provide students with access to computers and technology, repair and replace outdated plumbing, heating and electrical systems, repair leaky roofs, construct and acquire new permanent classrooms and facilities, provide classroom handicapped access, install safety glass to meet earthquake safety codes, and repair and upgrade schools throughout the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10592, "fingerprint": "1998|199800375|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800375|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "77fafe62a1a9fc29", "measure_id": "199800375", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pomona be amended?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9843, "no_votes": 7640, "total_votes": 17483, "percent_yes": 56.3004061087914, "percent_no": 43.6995938912086, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.819305", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.126599", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Pomona be amended?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10593, "fingerprint": "1998|199800376|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800376|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "6316436d27719e97", "measure_id": "199800376", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of restructuring the general sanitation fee, revising the method of calculation and increasing the amount of the fee collected by the City of Pomona?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5416, "no_votes": 12626, "total_votes": 18042, "percent_yes": 30.01884491741492, "percent_no": 69.98115508258508, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.819657", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.126785", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of restructuring the general sanitation fee, revising the method of calculation and increasing the amount of the fee collected by the City of Pomona?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10594, "fingerprint": "1998|199800377|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800377|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "099d89c5890523ce", "measure_id": "199800377", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of levying a special tax for public safety police services on parcels of property in the City of Pomona and increasing the City of Pomona spending limit by the amount of this special tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6318, "no_votes": 11651, "total_votes": 17969, "percent_yes": 35.160554287940336, "percent_no": 64.83944571205967, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.819997", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.126983", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of levying a special tax for public safety police services on parcels of property in the City of Pomona and increasing the City of Pomona spending limit by the amount of this special tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12226, "fingerprint": "1998|199800378|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800378|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "9c1571c365287c1b", "measure_id": "199800378", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of levying a special tax for parks and recreation services in the City of Pomona?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6144, "no_votes": 12075, "total_votes": 18219, "percent_yes": 33.723036390581264, "percent_no": 66.27696360941874, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.426696", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.820346", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.127175", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of levying a special tax for parks and recreation services in the City of Pomona?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10572, "fingerprint": "1998|199800041|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800041|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "0f86b15c1f19242a", "measure_id": "199800041", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve neighborhood schools, including health and safety conditions, such as inadequate unsafe electrical and heating systems; repair of deteriorating roofs, plumbing/sewer systems; elimination of asbestos hazards; make seismic upgrades; and provision of adequate restroom facilities, shall the South Whittier School District issue bonds in an amount not to  exceed $15 million, at an interest rate within the legal limit, for the acquisition, construction and modernization of school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1003, "no_votes": 180, "total_votes": 1183, "percent_yes": 84.78444632290785, "percent_no": 15.215553677092146, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.812013", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.121819", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve neighborhood schools, including health and safety conditions, such as inadequate unsafe electrical and heating systems; repair of deteriorating roofs, plumbing/sewer systems; elimination of asbestos hazards; make seismic upgrades; and provision of adequate restroom facilities, shall the South Whittier School District issue bonds in an amount not to  exceed $15 million, at an interest rate within the legal limit, for the acquisition, construction and modernization of school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10602, "fingerprint": "1998|199800531|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800531|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "dd18b34407a70ca5", "measure_id": "199800531", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the purpose of acquiring and constructing facilities to accommodate smaller class size, science and computer labs and other programs; and for continued earthquake safety improvements, removing asbestos, repairing schools, making school grounds and restroom improvements, providing disabled access to existing facilities, and bringing high school facilities up to standards, shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District incur a bonded indebtedness in the maximum amount of $42,000,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26575, "no_votes": 6547, "total_votes": 33122, "percent_yes": 80.23368154096974, "percent_no": 19.76631845903026, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.822881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.128836", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the purpose of acquiring and constructing facilities to accommodate smaller class size, science and computer labs and other programs; and for continued earthquake safety improvements, removing asbestos, repairing schools, making school grounds and restroom improvements, providing disabled access to existing facilities, and bringing high school facilities up to standards, shall the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District incur a bonded indebtedness in the maximum amount of $42,000,000, with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10604, "fingerprint": "1998|199800533|LOS ANGELES|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800533|LOS ANGELES", "content_hash": "60b2c30ff369a56d", "measure_id": "199800533", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Los Angeles", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, build permanent classrooms, upgrade and repair schools throughout the district, shall the Westside Union School District be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed the maximum allowed by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8398, "no_votes": 3786, "total_votes": 12184, "percent_yes": 68.92646093237033, "percent_no": 31.073539067629667, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.823546", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.129207", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, build permanent classrooms, upgrade and repair schools throughout the district, shall the Westside Union School District be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed the maximum allowed by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Los_Angeles_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Los Angeles County Elections", "url": "https://lavote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10606, "fingerprint": "1998|199800202|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800202|MADERA", "content_hash": "33571b658ea5e13d", "measure_id": "199800202", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Should the territory of the current Webster Elementary School attendance area be detached from the Madera Unified School District and be reorganized to form a separate unified school district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1293, "no_votes": 714, "total_votes": 2007, "percent_yes": 64.42451420029896, "percent_no": 35.57548579970104, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.824087", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.129578", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the territory of the current Webster Elementary School attendance area be detached from the Madera Unified School District and be reorganized to form a separate unified school district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10607, "fingerprint": "1998|199800203|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800203|MADERA", "content_hash": "1ba5009a81d20e01", "measure_id": "199800203", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Yosemite Joint Union High School District issue bonds to complete Yosemite High School, which currently accommodates over 1,200 students in facilities designed for 600 students, by adding additional classrooms, upgrading its library, constructing computer labs, additions, capital improvements and real property acquisitions in an amount not to exceed Eleven Million Seven Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($11,160,000.00) at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4858, "no_votes": 1991, "total_votes": 6849, "percent_yes": 70.93006278288802, "percent_no": 29.069937217111985, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.824353", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.129761", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Yosemite Joint Union High School District issue bonds to complete Yosemite High School, which currently accommodates over 1,200 students in facilities designed for 600 students, by adding additional classrooms, upgrading its library, constructing computer labs, additions, capital improvements and real property acquisitions in an amount not to exceed Eleven Million Seven Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($11,160,000.00) at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10608, "fingerprint": "1998|199800534|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800534|MADERA", "content_hash": "f08360f820ca3484", "measure_id": "199800534", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, repair and upgrade classrooms for student safety, build new classrooms to expand course offerings, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $19 million of bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 62, "no_votes": 64, "total_votes": 126, "percent_yes": 49.2063492063492, "percent_no": 50.7936507936508, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.824933", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.130134", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, repair and upgrade classrooms for student safety, build new classrooms to expand course offerings, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $19 million of bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12228, "fingerprint": "1998|199800383|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800383|MADERA", "content_hash": "8c0e4b00b55eb6f7", "measure_id": "199800383", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Madera authorize a 1/4 cent (0.25%) increase to City sales and use tax for 8 years funding law enforcement as follows: a) gang prevention, youth offender supervision, school patrol and graffiti cleanup; b) additional officers for neighborhood patrols and neighborhood watch; c) officer training and retention; d) equipment, including trained police/search dogs. All of this tax shall be for purposes listed above, unless voters specifically authorize a change. This tax expires after 8 years.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3844, "no_votes": 2172, "total_votes": 6016, "percent_yes": 63.89627659574468, "percent_no": 36.10372340425532, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.431183", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.824621", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.129946", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Madera authorize a 1/4 cent (0.25%) increase to City sales and use tax for 8 years funding law enforcement as follows: a) gang prevention, youth offender supervision, school patrol and graffiti cleanup; b) additional officers for neighborhood patrols and neighborhood watch; c) officer training and retention; d) equipment, including trained police/search dogs. All of this tax shall be for purposes listed above, unless voters specifically authorize a change. This tax expires after 8 years.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10605, "fingerprint": "1998|199800152|MADERA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800152|MADERA", "content_hash": "8c0e4b00b55eb6f7", "measure_id": "199800152", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Madera", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Madera authorize a 1/4 cent (0.25%) increase to City sales and use tax for 8 years funding law enforcement as follows: a) gang prevention, youth offender supervision, school patrol and graffiti cleanup; b) additional officers for neighborhood patrols and neighborhood watch; c) officer training and retention; d) equipment, including trained police/search dogs. All of this tax shall be for purposes listed above, unless voters specifically authorize a change. This tax expires after 8 years.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2997, "no_votes": 1667, "total_votes": 4664, "percent_yes": 64.2581475128645, "percent_no": 35.7418524871355, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.823818", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.129393", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Madera authorize a 1/4 cent (0.25%) increase to City sales and use tax for 8 years funding law enforcement as follows: a) gang prevention, youth offender supervision, school patrol and graffiti cleanup; b) additional officers for neighborhood patrols and neighborhood watch; c) officer training and retention; d) equipment, including trained police/search dogs. All of this tax shall be for purposes listed above, unless voters specifically authorize a change. This tax expires after 8 years.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Madera_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10617, "fingerprint": "1998|199800205|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800205|MARIN", "content_hash": "a86c660dd555f2ef", "measure_id": "199800205", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Dennis D. Elasser be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2009, "no_votes": 787, "total_votes": 2796, "percent_yes": 71.85264663805437, "percent_no": 28.147353361945633, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.828984", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.132713", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Dennis D. Elasser be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10618, "fingerprint": "1998|199800206|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800206|MARIN", "content_hash": "ea7513cf5d323b12", "measure_id": "199800206", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Gracie Grove be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1915, "no_votes": 742, "total_votes": 2657, "percent_yes": 72.07376740684983, "percent_no": 27.926232593150175, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.829249", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.132898", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Gracie Grove be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10619, "fingerprint": "1998|199800207|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800207|MARIN", "content_hash": "8f4ebb821ab0cb29", "measure_id": "199800207", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Delores Talley be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1800, "no_votes": 863, "total_votes": 2663, "percent_yes": 67.59294029290274, "percent_no": 32.40705970709726, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.829513", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.133083", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Delores Talley be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12234, "fingerprint": "1998|199800261|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800261|MARIN", "content_hash": "75969f3225d31cde", "measure_id": "199800261", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should any new voter approved sales tax be used to : implement commuter rail service between Sonoma and Marin; expand local bus and shuttle services; reduce development and traffic by protecting environmentally sensitive areas; complete Highway 101 carpool lanes from Novato through Mill Valley; improve local streets; expand transit for seniors and disabled; and improve pedestrian/bicycle paths; complete program during 20 year period; administrative expenses limited to 2%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 58707, "no_votes": 33933, "total_votes": 92640, "percent_yes": 63.37111398963731, "percent_no": 36.62888601036269, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.436244", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.829778", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.133266", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should any new voter approved sales tax be used to : implement commuter rail service between Sonoma and Marin; expand local bus and shuttle services; reduce development and traffic by protecting environmentally sensitive areas; complete Highway 101 carpool lanes from Novato through Mill Valley; improve local streets; expand transit for seniors and disabled; and improve pedestrian/bicycle paths; complete program during 20 year period; administrative expenses limited to 2%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12230, "fingerprint": "1998|199800049|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800049|MARIN", "content_hash": "4d4d3a01f2e867f9", "measure_id": "199800049", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve quality education for students in the San Rafael High School District, emphasizing improved reading, writing, and math skills; improved science, computer and library programs; and maintaining smaller class sizes; shall the San Rafael High School District levy a total assessment of $67 per developed or undeveloped parcel, beginning July 1, 1998 (each year for eight years) with subsequent 5% annual cost of living adjustments beginning July 1, 1999?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8083, "no_votes": 3114, "total_votes": 11197, "percent_yes": 72.1889791908547, "percent_no": 27.811020809145305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.434196", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.827834", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.131975", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve quality education for students in the San Rafael High School District, emphasizing improved reading, writing, and math skills; improved science, computer and library programs; and maintaining smaller class sizes; shall the San Rafael High School District levy a total assessment of $67 per developed or undeveloped parcel, beginning July 1, 1998 (each year for eight years) with subsequent 5% annual cost of living adjustments beginning July 1, 1999?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10609, "fingerprint": "1998|199800011|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800011|MARIN", "content_hash": "cac736ad782a2568", "measure_id": "199800011", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the master plan and zoning ordinances establishing certain land use regulations which will allow the development of the Black Point golf links and residential project be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7192, "no_votes": 4516, "total_votes": 11708, "percent_yes": 61.4280833618039, "percent_no": 38.5719166381961, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-02-24", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.825276", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.130316", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the master plan and zoning ordinances establishing certain land use regulations which will allow the development of the Black Point golf links and residential project be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12235, "fingerprint": "1998|199800262|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800262|MARIN", "content_hash": "f10ac58a91f79921", "measure_id": "199800262", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the people of Marin County approve County Ordinance NO. 3282 enacting a County half cent general sales tax for no more than 20 years and requesting an annual independent sales tax expenditure audit to the public and publicized in local newspapers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39263, "no_votes": 53104, "total_votes": 92367, "percent_yes": 42.507605530113565, "percent_no": 57.492394469886435, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.436529", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.830051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.133453", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of Marin County approve County Ordinance NO. 3282 enacting a County half cent general sales tax for no more than 20 years and requesting an annual independent sales tax expenditure audit to the public and publicized in local newspapers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12233, "fingerprint": "1998|199800204|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800204|MARIN", "content_hash": "aa0e9da63833c1e3", "measure_id": "199800204", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Kentfield School District issue bonds to repair electrical, plumbing, and roofing systems; to upgrade and expand the libraries and the computer/technology learning centers; to renovate science, math and other classrooms to carry out the educational programs at Bacich Elementary School and Kent Middle School; and to make other necessary repairs, capital and real property improvements at both schools in an amount not to exceed $13,500,000 at an interest rate not to exceed to the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3358, "no_votes": 989, "total_votes": 4347, "percent_yes": 77.24867724867724, "percent_no": 22.75132275132276, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.435022", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.828709", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.132529", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Kentfield School District issue bonds to repair electrical, plumbing, and roofing systems; to upgrade and expand the libraries and the computer/technology learning centers; to renovate science, math and other classrooms to carry out the educational programs at Bacich Elementary School and Kent Middle School; and to make other necessary repairs, capital and real property improvements at both schools in an amount not to exceed $13,500,000 at an interest rate not to exceed to the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12229, "fingerprint": "1998|199800045|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800045|MARIN", "content_hash": "355538a2057309f4", "measure_id": "199800045", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve quality education for students in the San Rafael High School District, emphasizing improved reading, writing, and math skills; improved science, computer and library programs; and maintaining smaller class sizes; shall the Dixie Elementary School District levy a total assessment of $98 per developed or undeveloped parcel, beginning July 1, 1998 (each year for eight years) with subsequent 5% annual cost of living adjustments beginning July 1, 1999?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2999, "no_votes": 967, "total_votes": 3966, "percent_yes": 75.61775088250126, "percent_no": 24.382249117498745, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.433107", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.826675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.131239", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve quality education for students in the San Rafael High School District, emphasizing improved reading, writing, and math skills; improved science, computer and library programs; and maintaining smaller class sizes; shall the Dixie Elementary School District levy a total assessment of $98 per developed or undeveloped parcel, beginning July 1, 1998 (each year for eight years) with subsequent 5% annual cost of living adjustments beginning July 1, 1999?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10610, "fingerprint": "1998|199800012|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800012|MARIN", "content_hash": "074ce097497763bf", "measure_id": "199800012", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the master plan ordinance (City of Novato Ordinance NO. 1376) establishing certain land use regulations which will allow the development of the Black Point golf links and residential project be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7075, "no_votes": 4583, "total_votes": 11658, "percent_yes": 60.687939612283415, "percent_no": 39.312060387716585, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-02-24", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.825579", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.130499", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the master plan ordinance (City of Novato Ordinance NO. 1376) establishing certain land use regulations which will allow the development of the Black Point golf links and residential project be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12240, "fingerprint": "1998|199800535|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800535|MARIN", "content_hash": "b2e25050c0fa57bf", "measure_id": "199800535", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District provide funds for the continuance of quality educational programs by levying a special tax assessment of $20.00 semi-annually per assessor\u2019s parcel for a limited period of 4 years, beginning July 1, 1999, with exemptions for any beneficial owners who have attained the age of 65 on or before May 1 of any applicable year, who use those parcels as their principle residences?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 818, "no_votes": 265, "total_votes": 1083, "percent_yes": 75.53093259464451, "percent_no": 24.46906740535549, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.438403", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.832149", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.134755", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District provide funds for the continuance of quality educational programs by levying a special tax assessment of $20.00 semi-annually per assessor\u2019s parcel for a limited period of 4 years, beginning July 1, 1999, with exemptions for any beneficial owners who have attained the age of 65 on or before May 1 of any applicable year, who use those parcels as their principle residences?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12231, "fingerprint": "1998|199800153|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800153|MARIN", "content_hash": "1194b0f0dacc00cc", "measure_id": "199800153", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance to amend the General Plan and rezone the Marin Town and Country Club property, identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers 2-131-10 and 2-131-11, from its present Commercial Recreation classification to a Conditioned Planned Development District classification, permitting up to 79 residential units on 9.5 acres, and providing 14 acres to the Town of Fairfax for open space or community recreation facilities, and $500,000 to help fund those facilities, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 717, "no_votes": 2565, "total_votes": 3282, "percent_yes": 21.84643510054844, "percent_no": 78.15356489945157, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.434472", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.828161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.132160", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance to amend the General Plan and rezone the Marin Town and Country Club property, identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers 2-131-10 and 2-131-11, from its present Commercial Recreation classification to a Conditioned Planned Development District classification, permitting up to 79 residential units on 9.5 acres, and providing 14 acres to the Town of Fairfax for open space or community recreation facilities, and $500,000 to help fund those facilities, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10616, "fingerprint": "1998|199800048|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800048|MARIN", "content_hash": "7f385e674c812216", "measure_id": "199800048", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain and improve quality education for students in the San Rafael Elementary School District, emphasizing improved reading, writing, and math skills; improved science, computer and library programs; and maintaining smaller class sizes; shall the San Rafael Elementary School District levy a total assessment of $98 per developed or undeveloped parcel, beginning July 1, 1998 (each year for eight years) with subsequent 5% annual cost of living adjustments beginning July 1, 1999?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5094, "no_votes": 2149, "total_votes": 7243, "percent_yes": 70.32997376777578, "percent_no": 29.670026232224217, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.827567", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.131786", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain and improve quality education for students in the San Rafael Elementary School District, emphasizing improved reading, writing, and math skills; improved science, computer and library programs; and maintaining smaller class sizes; shall the San Rafael Elementary School District levy a total assessment of $98 per developed or undeveloped parcel, beginning July 1, 1998 (each year for eight years) with subsequent 5% annual cost of living adjustments beginning July 1, 1999?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12232, "fingerprint": "1998|199800154|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800154|MARIN", "content_hash": "55ad0da39749ca28", "measure_id": "199800154", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Sausalito City Council be authorized to : dedicate approximately 6.7 acres of the Martin Luther King site for public recreational facilities and playing fields; reserve approximately 1.1 acres for a dog park; subliease approximately 6.0 acres for a commercial recreational facility with swimming pools, tennis courts, dining facilities and related amenities together with approximately 3.5 acres of parking, to be developed without public expense and to generate positive cash flow, on terms negotiated by the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 813, "no_votes": 1535, "total_votes": 2348, "percent_yes": 34.6252129471891, "percent_no": 65.3747870528109, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.434719", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.828430", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.132346", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sausalito City Council be authorized to : dedicate approximately 6.7 acres of the Martin Luther King site for public recreational facilities and playing fields; reserve approximately 1.1 acres for a dog park; subliease approximately 6.0 acres for a commercial recreational facility with swimming pools, tennis courts, dining facilities and related amenities together with approximately 3.5 acres of parking, to be developed without public expense and to generate positive cash flow, on terms negotiated by the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10611, "fingerprint": "1998|199800017|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800017|MARIN", "content_hash": "b0aece1bdf3aaa9a", "measure_id": "199800017", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Belvedere, pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution, adjust its appropriations limit  for the period July 1, 1998 through June 30, 2002, as specified in City of Belvedere Ordinance NO. 94-1, thereby enabling the City to continue the special assessment adopted by the voters in 1982 for essential rehabilitation, improvements and maintenance of City streets, storm drains, water mains for fire flow purposes, and other public facilities, and purchase of essential equipment including, but not limited to police patrol cars?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 301, "no_votes": 41, "total_votes": 342, "percent_yes": 88.01169590643275, "percent_no": 11.988304093567251, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.825854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.130680", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Belvedere, pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution, adjust its appropriations limit  for the period July 1, 1998 through June 30, 2002, as specified in City of Belvedere Ordinance NO. 94-1, thereby enabling the City to continue the special assessment adopted by the voters in 1982 for essential rehabilitation, improvements and maintenance of City streets, storm drains, water mains for fire flow purposes, and other public facilities, and purchase of essential equipment including, but not limited to police patrol cars?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12236, "fingerprint": "1998|199800384|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800384|MARIN", "content_hash": "a1d9b3906e9c848e", "measure_id": "199800384", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Town of Corte Madera adopt an ordinance imposing and continuing a four year annual special tax for paramedic and/or emergency medical services commencing with fiscal year 1999-2000, which tax, annually, shall not exceed $30.00 for each living unit and $30.00 per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in nonresidential use, and increasing the Town\u2019s appropriations limit by the amount of the proceeds of said tax for each of said four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3009, "no_votes": 774, "total_votes": 3783, "percent_yes": 79.5400475812847, "percent_no": 20.459952418715304, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.436802", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.830340", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.133634", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Town of Corte Madera adopt an ordinance imposing and continuing a four year annual special tax for paramedic and/or emergency medical services commencing with fiscal year 1999-2000, which tax, annually, shall not exceed $30.00 for each living unit and $30.00 per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in nonresidential use, and increasing the Town\u2019s appropriations limit by the amount of the proceeds of said tax for each of said four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10613, "fingerprint": "1998|199800044|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800044|MARIN", "content_hash": "382c3aec6b8fdaaa", "measure_id": "199800044", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District continue funding quality educational programs by levying a special tax assessment of one hundred and fifty-eight dollars ($158.00) per year per assessor\u2019s parcel for a limited period of seven (7) years, beginning July 1, 1998, with an exemption for any beneficial owner of a parcel who has attained the age of 65 on or before May 1 of any applicable year, who uses that parcel as his or her principal residence?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 383, "no_votes": 88, "total_votes": 471, "percent_yes": 81.31634819532908, "percent_no": 18.683651804670916, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.826400", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.131049", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Bolinas-Stinson Union School District continue funding quality educational programs by levying a special tax assessment of one hundred and fifty-eight dollars ($158.00) per year per assessor\u2019s parcel for a limited period of seven (7) years, beginning July 1, 1998, with an exemption for any beneficial owner of a parcel who has attained the age of 65 on or before May 1 of any applicable year, who uses that parcel as his or her principal residence?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12237, "fingerprint": "1998|199800385|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800385|MARIN", "content_hash": "cb3d86721e36a528", "measure_id": "199800385", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a four year special tax commencing 1999-2000, for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use to be levied in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers without pursuing collection for uninsured persons, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2342, "no_votes": 903, "total_votes": 3245, "percent_yes": 72.17257318952234, "percent_no": 27.82742681047766, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.437078", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.830620", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.133825", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a four year special tax commencing 1999-2000, for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use to be levied in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers without pursuing collection for uninsured persons, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10612, "fingerprint": "1998|199800018|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800018|MARIN", "content_hash": "2aa26ee2bf955e2f", "measure_id": "199800018", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Sausalito City council be authorized to take the following actions regarding Public Parking Lots, Parks and the Martin Luther King school site, notwithstanding Ordinance 1128: a) permit festivals, exhibits, farmers markets, arts events, fairs, and similar public events; b)authorize public amenities and facilities, specifically including walkways, benches, lighting and Americans with Disabilities Act improvements previously approved for Plaza Vina del Mar; c) perform necessary and desirable maintenance; d) take necessary actions to facilitate public access and enjoyment of public properties.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 740, "no_votes": 1838, "total_votes": 2578, "percent_yes": 28.7044220325834, "percent_no": 71.2955779674166, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.826123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.130866", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sausalito City council be authorized to take the following actions regarding Public Parking Lots, Parks and the Martin Luther King school site, notwithstanding Ordinance 1128: a) permit festivals, exhibits, farmers markets, arts events, fairs, and similar public events; b)authorize public amenities and facilities, specifically including walkways, benches, lighting and Americans with Disabilities Act improvements previously approved for Plaza Vina del Mar; c) perform necessary and desirable maintenance; d) take necessary actions to facilitate public access and enjoyment of public properties.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12238, "fingerprint": "1998|199800386|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800386|MARIN", "content_hash": "a66ec6d884aa6d12", "measure_id": "199800386", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the resolution of the City Council of Larkspur imposing a special tax for paramedic services of not-to-exceed Thirty dollars (30.00) per year for each living unit as a basic charge be confirmed and the appropriations limit be increased by an amount equal to the proceeds of said tax for each of the next four (4) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3876, "no_votes": 1276, "total_votes": 5152, "percent_yes": 75.23291925465838, "percent_no": 24.767080745341616, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.437349", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.830896", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.134007", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the resolution of the City Council of Larkspur imposing a special tax for paramedic services of not-to-exceed Thirty dollars (30.00) per year for each living unit as a basic charge be confirmed and the appropriations limit be increased by an amount equal to the proceeds of said tax for each of the next four (4) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10614, "fingerprint": "1998|199800046|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800046|MARIN", "content_hash": "67042dda50f4dbb1", "measure_id": "199800046", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To support specific educational programs, and continue to provide instructional materials and equipment for a growing student population, shall the Mill Valley School District (Edna Maguire, Mill Valley Middles, Old Mill, Park, Strawberry Point, and Tamalpais Valley) continue its special assessment, at the new rate of $275 per year, for a period of 8 years, beginning on July 1, 1998, and annually increase the rate by 5% with an exemption for property owners age 65 on or before July 1 of the applicable year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4328, "no_votes": 1243, "total_votes": 5571, "percent_yes": 77.68802728415008, "percent_no": 22.31197271584992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.826962", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.131421", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To support specific educational programs, and continue to provide instructional materials and equipment for a growing student population, shall the Mill Valley School District (Edna Maguire, Mill Valley Middles, Old Mill, Park, Strawberry Point, and Tamalpais Valley) continue its special assessment, at the new rate of $275 per year, for a period of 8 years, beginning on July 1, 1998, and annually increase the rate by 5% with an exemption for property owners age 65 on or before July 1 of the applicable year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12239, "fingerprint": "1998|199800387|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800387|MARIN", "content_hash": "39a9305b1de9d01d", "measure_id": "199800387", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall there be a special four year tax for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 894, "no_votes": 233, "total_votes": 1127, "percent_yes": 79.32564330079857, "percent_no": 20.674356699201425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.437613", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.831168", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.134193", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall there be a special four year tax for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10615, "fingerprint": "1998|199800047|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800047|MARIN", "content_hash": "9ea3d4f0f7147d5d", "measure_id": "199800047", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To accommodate increased enrollment growth and the State class size reduction program, shall the Mill Valley School District reopen, expand and renovate Strawberry Point School and provide additional classrooms and other facilities and improvements at Mill Valley Middle School, and incur bonded indebtedness of $7,700,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the limit set by law, to be used for the above purposes and for necessary capital facilities in the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4313, "no_votes": 1256, "total_votes": 5569, "percent_yes": 77.44657927814688, "percent_no": 22.553420721853115, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.827294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.131603", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To accommodate increased enrollment growth and the State class size reduction program, shall the Mill Valley School District reopen, expand and renovate Strawberry Point School and provide additional classrooms and other facilities and improvements at Mill Valley Middle School, and incur bonded indebtedness of $7,700,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the limit set by law, to be used for the above purposes and for necessary capital facilities in the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10620, "fingerprint": "1998|199800388|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800388|MARIN", "content_hash": "90b2c5c64d40c88b", "measure_id": "199800388", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Commencing 1999-2000, shall there be a four year special tax for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use to be levied in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers without pursuing collection for uninsured persons, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3784, "no_votes": 1439, "total_votes": 5223, "percent_yes": 72.44878422362628, "percent_no": 27.551215776373724, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.831531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.134375", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Commencing 1999-2000, shall there be a four year special tax for paramedic services in an amount not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per year per living unit and per 1,500 square feet of structure on each developed parcel in non-residential use to be levied in addition to transport fees charged to insurance providers without pursuing collection for uninsured persons, with the appropriations limit increased by the amount of said tax for the next four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10621, "fingerprint": "1998|199800389|MARIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800389|MARIN", "content_hash": "6c18344d48636f46", "measure_id": "199800389", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Marin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Rafael Ordinance No. 1727 imposing a special tax for paramedic services be amended to set the tax at an amount not to exceed $53.00 per year for each living unit, and not to exceed 7 cents per square foot with a flat tax limit of $500 for each 1 cent per square foot tax levied for each non-residential structure, and shall the City of San Rafael\u2019s appropriations limit be correspondingly increased for four (4) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10393, "no_votes": 6563, "total_votes": 16956, "percent_yes": 61.29393724935126, "percent_no": 38.70606275064874, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.831814", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.134561", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Rafael Ordinance No. 1727 imposing a special tax for paramedic services be amended to set the tax at an amount not to exceed $53.00 per year for each living unit, and not to exceed 7 cents per square foot with a flat tax limit of $500 for each 1 cent per square foot tax levied for each non-residential structure, and shall the City of San Rafael\u2019s appropriations limit be correspondingly increased for four (4) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Marin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Marin County Elections", "url": "https://www.marinvotes.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10622, "fingerprint": "1998|199800208|MARIPOSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800208|MARIPOSA", "content_hash": "72951619f2d9087d", "measure_id": "199800208", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Mariposa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Mariposa County Unified School District issue bonds to acquire real property and construct a new high school, including library, computer/technology and science learning centers and to eliminate overcrowding; construct cafeteria/libraries/multi-purpose rooms and other capital improvements as necessary at Catherys Valley, Coulterville-Greeley, Lake Don Pedro, Woodland and Mariposa Elementary schools and Mariposa Middle School which will also provide facilities for indoor eating, school activates, community events and emergency shelters in an amount not exceeding $29,790,000 at an interest rate not exceeding the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2888, "no_votes": 2736, "total_votes": 5624, "percent_yes": 51.35135135135135, "percent_no": 48.64864864864865, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.832433", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.134949", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mariposa County Unified School District issue bonds to acquire real property and construct a new high school, including library, computer/technology and science learning centers and to eliminate overcrowding; construct cafeteria/libraries/multi-purpose rooms and other capital improvements as necessary at Catherys Valley, Coulterville-Greeley, Lake Don Pedro, Woodland and Mariposa Elementary schools and Mariposa Middle School which will also provide facilities for indoor eating, school activates, community events and emergency shelters in an amount not exceeding $29,790,000 at an interest rate not exceeding the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mariposa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10623, "fingerprint": "1998|199800209|MARIPOSA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800209|MARIPOSA", "content_hash": "980b1fd0351be561", "measure_id": "199800209", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Mariposa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Yosemite Joint Union High School District issue bonds to complete Yosemite High School, which currently accommodates over 1,200 students in facilities designate for 600 students, by adding additional classrooms, upgrading its library, constructing computer labs, acquiring portable classrooms, and to make alterations, additions, capital improvements and real property acquisitions in an amount not to exceed Eleven Million Seven Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($11,760,000.00) at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80, "no_votes": 25, "total_votes": 105, "percent_yes": 76.19047619047619, "percent_no": 23.80952380952381, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.832764", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.135134", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Yosemite Joint Union High School District issue bonds to complete Yosemite High School, which currently accommodates over 1,200 students in facilities designate for 600 students, by adding additional classrooms, upgrading its library, constructing computer labs, acquiring portable classrooms, and to make alterations, additions, capital improvements and real property acquisitions in an amount not to exceed Eleven Million Seven Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($11,760,000.00) at an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mariposa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10624, "fingerprint": "1998|199800210|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800210|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "a4240d7e432b1be9", "measure_id": "199800210", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide for present and future classroom and other building needs for students, shall Mendocino Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of $2,500,000 bearing interest at rates within the legal limit, to finance improvements to and/or acquisition of school buildings and grounds, including for such purposes construction of a new music building at Mendocino High, a classroom/multipurpose building serving Mendocino Grammar and Middle Schools, and classrooms for an Albion School?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1657, "no_votes": 735, "total_votes": 2392, "percent_yes": 69.27257525083613, "percent_no": 30.727424749163873, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.833037", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.135320", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide for present and future classroom and other building needs for students, shall Mendocino Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of $2,500,000 bearing interest at rates within the legal limit, to finance improvements to and/or acquisition of school buildings and grounds, including for such purposes construction of a new music building at Mendocino High, a classroom/multipurpose building serving Mendocino Grammar and Middle Schools, and classrooms for an Albion School?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10625, "fingerprint": "1998|199800390|MENDOCINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800390|MENDOCINO", "content_hash": "a9748f05b3425b53", "measure_id": "199800390", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Mendocino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of Mayor be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1446, "no_votes": 2679, "total_votes": 4125, "percent_yes": 35.05454545454545, "percent_no": 64.94545454545455, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.833354", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.135508", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of Mayor be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mendocino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10626, "fingerprint": "1998|199800100|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800100|MONO", "content_hash": "e2033bbdad11e1c5", "measure_id": "199800100", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Mono County Board of Supervisors establish an appointed county office of Director of Finance which would be consolidated with and to that extent eliminate the presently distinct and elected county offices of Auditor-Controller and Treasurer-Tax Collector, effective at the end of the current terms of these offices, and which would have all the powers and duties of such formerly elected offices together with such other powers and duties as the Board of Supervisors may provide?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1308, "no_votes": 1825, "total_votes": 3133, "percent_yes": 41.74912224704756, "percent_no": 58.25087775295244, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.833627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.135693", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mono County Board of Supervisors establish an appointed county office of Director of Finance which would be consolidated with and to that extent eliminate the presently distinct and elected county offices of Auditor-Controller and Treasurer-Tax Collector, effective at the end of the current terms of these offices, and which would have all the powers and duties of such formerly elected offices together with such other powers and duties as the Board of Supervisors may provide?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10627, "fingerprint": "1998|199800101|MONO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800101|MONO", "content_hash": "c62508243520a051", "measure_id": "199800101", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Mono", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Mono County board of Supervisors increase Mono County?s rate of taxation on the privilege of occupying a room or rooms, or other living space, in a hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, or other lodging in the unincorporated areas of the County for 30 days or less (generally referred to as transient occupancy tax) from its present rate of nine percent  of the rent charged to a new rate of ten percent of the rent charged (an increase of one percent) and expand the scope of such taxation to include all forms of occupancies and lodging that a county is permitted to tax under state law, including spaces at certain campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1474, "no_votes": 1675, "total_votes": 3149, "percent_yes": 46.80851063829787, "percent_no": 53.19148936170213, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.833942", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.136121", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mono County board of Supervisors increase Mono County?s rate of taxation on the privilege of occupying a room or rooms, or other living space, in a hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, or other lodging in the unincorporated areas of the County for 30 days or less (generally referred to as transient occupancy tax) from its present rate of nine percent  of the rent charged to a new rate of ten percent of the rent charged (an increase of one percent) and expand the scope of such taxation to include all forms of occupancies and lodging that a county is permitted to tax under state law, including spaces at certain campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Mono_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12241, "fingerprint": "1998|199800393|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800393|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "24f9afbee4689f98", "measure_id": "199800393", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 120 be added to the city Charter establishing a three-member Board of Arbitrators who would replace the Council as the final decision-making authority regarding Fire Department Employee wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13647, "no_votes": 9073, "total_votes": 22720, "percent_yes": 60.06602112676056, "percent_no": 39.93397887323944, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.441031", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.835428", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.137264", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 120 be added to the city Charter establishing a three-member Board of Arbitrators who would replace the Council as the final decision-making authority regarding Fire Department Employee wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10628, "fingerprint": "1998|199800019|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800019|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c320e3cd113e7498", "measure_id": "199800019", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 96-12 amending Title 5 of the Municipal Code, Business License Taxes, Licenses and Regulations, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 874, "no_votes": 420, "total_votes": 1294, "percent_yes": 67.54250386398763, "percent_no": 32.45749613601237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.834298", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.136462", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 96-12 amending Title 5 of the Municipal Code, Business License Taxes, Licenses and Regulations, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10632, "fingerprint": "1998|199800394|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800394|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "559566548ec86ab9", "measure_id": "199800394", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 121 be added to the Charter to mandate voter approval of any financial burdens associated with a binding arbitration decision involving Fire Department employee wages, benefits or other terms and conditions of employment exceeding by $12,000 or more that last City settlement offer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7990, "no_votes": 14495, "total_votes": 22485, "percent_yes": 35.534800978430056, "percent_no": 64.46519902156994, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.835695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.137450", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 121 be added to the Charter to mandate voter approval of any financial burdens associated with a binding arbitration decision involving Fire Department employee wages, benefits or other terms and conditions of employment exceeding by $12,000 or more that last City settlement offer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10633, "fingerprint": "1998|199800395|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800395|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "8b1c25518878b3b0", "measure_id": "199800395", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the November 21, 1995 Council action adopting Ordinance No. 2271  which removed the \u201csunset provision\u201d in the Salinas City Ordinance No. 2231 be approved to allow the City to continue assessing the Business License Tax at it\u2019s current increased rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7548, "no_votes": 14166, "total_votes": 21714, "percent_yes": 34.76098369715391, "percent_no": 65.2390163028461, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.835969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.137635", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the November 21, 1995 Council action adopting Ordinance No. 2271  which removed the \u201csunset provision\u201d in the Salinas City Ordinance No. 2231 be approved to allow the City to continue assessing the Business License Tax at it\u2019s current increased rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10630, "fingerprint": "1998|199800391|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800391|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "199800391", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 474, "no_votes": 447, "total_votes": 921, "percent_yes": 51.46579804560261, "percent_no": 48.53420195439739, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.834882", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.136880", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10635, "fingerprint": "1998|199800537|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800537|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "6d0c58fcab04d6e4", "measure_id": "199800537", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to construct new facilities to relieve student overcrowding, rehabilitate and repair current schools and improve technology for our students, shall the Pajaro Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $67,500,000 in bonds for the acquisition and improvement of real property for school purposes at interest rates within the legal limits, allocated as $29,600,000 to the Aptos area, $37,900,000 to the Watsonville area, with each area contribution $10,500,000 to costs of a new high school?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 830, "no_votes": 527, "total_votes": 1357, "percent_yes": 61.16433308769344, "percent_no": 38.83566691230656, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.836573", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.138015", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to construct new facilities to relieve student overcrowding, rehabilitate and repair current schools and improve technology for our students, shall the Pajaro Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $67,500,000 in bonds for the acquisition and improvement of real property for school purposes at interest rates within the legal limits, allocated as $29,600,000 to the Aptos area, $37,900,000 to the Watsonville area, with each area contribution $10,500,000 to costs of a new high school?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10631, "fingerprint": "1998|199800392|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800392|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "14f8655b5e4cc151", "measure_id": "199800392", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To increase in utility users\u2019 tax from two percent (2%) to three percent (3%) imposed by Ordinance No. 583 passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of King September 12, 1995, is validated and shall continue to be imposed.  Such increase of one percent (1%) applies to telephone users; electricity users; gas users; gas used by co-generation plan; user of gas and electric service receiving such service from a non utility supplier; water users; cable television users; and video providers users in the City of King?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 642, "no_votes": 682, "total_votes": 1324, "percent_yes": 48.489425981873104, "percent_no": 51.510574018126896, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.835158", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.137068", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To increase in utility users\u2019 tax from two percent (2%) to three percent (3%) imposed by Ordinance No. 583 passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of King September 12, 1995, is validated and shall continue to be imposed.  Such increase of one percent (1%) applies to telephone users; electricity users; gas users; gas used by co-generation plan; user of gas and electric service receiving such service from a non utility supplier; water users; cable television users; and video providers users in the City of King?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10634, "fingerprint": "1998|199800536|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800536|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "14fa59a4e0b2acc8", "measure_id": "199800536", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to reduce class size and student overcrowding, provide students with access to modern technology, repair and upgrade classrooms throughout the district, build permanent classrooms, and make the district eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the King City Union School District issue $12 million of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by law to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1539, "no_votes": 601, "total_votes": 2140, "percent_yes": 71.91588785046729, "percent_no": 28.084112149532714, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.836239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.137829", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to reduce class size and student overcrowding, provide students with access to modern technology, repair and upgrade classrooms throughout the district, build permanent classrooms, and make the district eligible to receive State matching funds, shall the King City Union School District issue $12 million of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by law to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10636, "fingerprint": "1998|199800538|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800538|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "7b149f7865e5ed4b", "measure_id": "199800538", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To permanently improve, repair and renovate existing high schools of Alisal, Alvarez, North Salinas, and Salinas High Schools, and the Adult School, including upgrades of lighting, heating, plumbing and electrical systems and infrastructure improvements for computer technology, shall Salinas Union High School District issue bonds not exceeding $33,500,00.00 for such permanent improvements at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 18785, "no_votes": 10845, "total_votes": 29630, "percent_yes": 63.39858251771852, "percent_no": 36.60141748228148, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.836858", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.138206", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To permanently improve, repair and renovate existing high schools of Alisal, Alvarez, North Salinas, and Salinas High Schools, and the Adult School, including upgrades of lighting, heating, plumbing and electrical systems and infrastructure improvements for computer technology, shall Salinas Union High School District issue bonds not exceeding $33,500,00.00 for such permanent improvements at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10638, "fingerprint": "1998|199800540|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800540|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "573b82298908465a", "measure_id": "199800540", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, repair and upgrade classrooms for student safety, build new classrooms to expand course offerings, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue  $19 million of bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition  of classrooms and facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7, "no_votes": 6, "total_votes": 13, "percent_yes": 53.84615384615385, "percent_no": 46.15384615384615, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.837394", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.138576", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, repair and upgrade classrooms for student safety, build new classrooms to expand course offerings, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue  $19 million of bonds with an interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction and acquisition  of classrooms and facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10637, "fingerprint": "1998|199800539|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800539|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "de8056131062f7dc", "measure_id": "199800539", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Salinas Union High School District Improvement District No. 1 (Middle School Improvement District) incur a bonded indebtedness to permanently improve, repair and renovate existing middle schools and to construct a new middle school within the territorial boundaries of District No. 1 in an amount not exceeding $16,500,000.00 at an interest rate not exceeding the maximum allowed by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12591, "no_votes": 7814, "total_votes": 20405, "percent_yes": 61.70546434697378, "percent_no": 38.29453565302622, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.837128", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.138392", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Salinas Union High School District Improvement District No. 1 (Middle School Improvement District) incur a bonded indebtedness to permanently improve, repair and renovate existing middle schools and to construct a new middle school within the territorial boundaries of District No. 1 in an amount not exceeding $16,500,000.00 at an interest rate not exceeding the maximum allowed by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10629, "fingerprint": "1998|199800263|MONTEREY|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800263|MONTEREY", "content_hash": "c9c8c2505bdae115", "measure_id": "199800263", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Monterey", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a one-half of one percent (0.5%) transactions and use tax (\u201csales tax\u201d) be imposed in Monterey County, for a period of nine (9) years, to fund the local contributions to construction of the Highway 101 Prunedale Bypass and to repair potholes and make other transportation and road safety improvements on city and county roads, as described in Ordinance No. 9801 which is printed in its entirety in the voter information pamphlet?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 46103, "no_votes": 41036, "total_votes": 87139, "percent_yes": 52.9074237712161, "percent_no": 47.0925762287839, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.834608", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.136663", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a one-half of one percent (0.5%) transactions and use tax (\u201csales tax\u201d) be imposed in Monterey County, for a period of nine (9) years, to fund the local contributions to construction of the Highway 101 Prunedale Bypass and to repair potholes and make other transportation and road safety improvements on city and county roads, as described in Ordinance No. 9801 which is printed in its entirety in the voter information pamphlet?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Monterey County Elections", "url": "https://www.montereycountyelections.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10639, "fingerprint": "1998|199800013|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800013|NAPA", "content_hash": "77d4ee2c47d0ec25", "measure_id": "199800013", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the People approve Ordinance No. 1(NCFPWIA), to provide countywide flood protection by increasing the sales/use tax by one-half percent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19107, "no_votes": 9104, "total_votes": 28211, "percent_yes": 67.72890007443905, "percent_no": 32.27109992556095, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-03-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.837720", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.138760", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the People approve Ordinance No. 1(NCFPWIA), to provide countywide flood protection by increasing the sales/use tax by one-half percent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10640, "fingerprint": "1998|199800211|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800211|NAPA", "content_hash": "ca74ea1adf30a4da", "measure_id": "199800211", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to relieve overcrowding and provide financing for school building and site needs, including for projects such as two additional classrooms and a multi-use room for student as well as community use, shall the Pope Valley Union Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $1,070,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit for the acquisition and improvement of real property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 98, "no_votes": 141, "total_votes": 239, "percent_yes": 41.00418410041841, "percent_no": 58.99581589958159, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.837991", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.138945", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to relieve overcrowding and provide financing for school building and site needs, including for projects such as two additional classrooms and a multi-use room for student as well as community use, shall the Pope Valley Union Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $1,070,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit for the acquisition and improvement of real property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10641, "fingerprint": "1998|199800241|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800241|NAPA", "content_hash": "95079660aaa36d22", "measure_id": "199800241", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "An ordinance of the county of Napa, State of California, levying a special tax for fire protection and prevention in certain unincorporated areas of the county, subject to voter approval.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4188, "no_votes": 2584, "total_votes": 6772, "percent_yes": 61.84288245717661, "percent_no": 38.15711754282339, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-07-28", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.838259", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.139129", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "An ordinance of the county of Napa, State of California, levying a special tax for fire protection and prevention in certain unincorporated areas of the county, subject to voter approval.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10642, "fingerprint": "1998|199800264|NAPA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800264|NAPA", "content_hash": "46bcb12c3ee4b037", "measure_id": "199800264", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Napa", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 98-1 (which creates a Historic Restaurant (:HR) Combination Zoning District for the purpose of allowing restaurants located on parcels included within the :HR to operate up to a 200 seat restaurant without obtaining a use permit if a 200 seat restaurant was operated on the parcel in 1985, and which amends the Napa County General Plan and rezones the parcel on which Brix Restaurant is located to the :HR be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21309, "no_votes": 19543, "total_votes": 40852, "percent_yes": 52.16146088318809, "percent_no": 47.83853911681191, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.838528", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.139308", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Napa County Ordinance No. 98-1 (which creates a Historic Restaurant (:HR) Combination Zoning District for the purpose of allowing restaurants located on parcels included within the :HR to operate up to a 200 seat restaurant without obtaining a use permit if a 200 seat restaurant was operated on the parcel in 1985, and which amends the Napa County General Plan and rezones the parcel on which Brix Restaurant is located to the :HR be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Napa_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Napa County Elections", "url": "https://www.countyofnapa.org/152/Elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10643, "fingerprint": "1998|199800020|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800020|NEVADA", "content_hash": "a4d51005c54dffc5", "measure_id": "199800020", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a 1/2 cent sales tax, which terminates automatically after 12 years, be collected exclusively for the purpose of improvement and maintenance of the Town \u201cbackbone\u201d roads specified in the ballot measure?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1557, "no_votes": 448, "total_votes": 2005, "percent_yes": 77.65586034912718, "percent_no": 22.34413965087282, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.838800", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.139502", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a 1/2 cent sales tax, which terminates automatically after 12 years, be collected exclusively for the purpose of improvement and maintenance of the Town \u201cbackbone\u201d roads specified in the ballot measure?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12242, "fingerprint": "1998|199800102|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800102|NEVADA", "content_hash": "8be6ef5d893d7232", "measure_id": "199800102", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Nevada County Ordinance Number 1967 be approved in order to provide funding of county-wide library operations by levying a 1/8 of one percent retail transactions and use tax for a period of five years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 21598, "no_votes": 9539, "total_votes": 31137, "percent_yes": 69.36442174904455, "percent_no": 30.635578250955447, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.444575", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.839422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.139878", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Nevada County Ordinance Number 1967 be approved in order to provide funding of county-wide library operations by levying a 1/8 of one percent retail transactions and use tax for a period of five years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10644, "fingerprint": "1998|199800050|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800050|NEVADA", "content_hash": "264609ea1054da15", "measure_id": "199800050", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct, renovate and repair only Truckee area schools, shall the School Facility Improvement District NO. 1 of the Tahoe-Truckee Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $35,000,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit, to acquire school sites, construct, renovate, rehabilitate, and modernize classrooms and school facilities.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1341, "no_votes": 807, "total_votes": 2148, "percent_yes": 62.43016759776536, "percent_no": 37.56983240223464, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.839155", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.139694", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct, renovate and repair only Truckee area schools, shall the School Facility Improvement District NO. 1 of the Tahoe-Truckee Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $35,000,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit, to acquire school sites, construct, renovate, rehabilitate, and modernize classrooms and school facilities.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10645, "fingerprint": "1998|199800155|NEVADA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800155|NEVADA", "content_hash": "0acfcf0097c21961", "measure_id": "199800155", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Nevada", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 9.14 be added to the Nevada City Municipal Code so as to regulate conduct on public property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 533, "no_votes": 739, "total_votes": 1272, "percent_yes": 41.90251572327044, "percent_no": 58.09748427672956, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.839698", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.140061", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 9.14 be added to the Nevada City Municipal Code so as to regulate conduct on public property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12243, "fingerprint": "1998|199800396|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800396|ORANGE", "content_hash": "4bfbb3148048ec91", "measure_id": "199800396", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 10.200-10.203 be added to the Anaheim City Charter to require unresolved disputes concerning wages, hours, or terms and conditions of employment between the City and the labor organization representing city firefighters to be submitted to a panel of three independent arbitrators to select the final offer of either the City or the firefighters\u2019 organization which decision would be imposed and become binding upon the City and the firefighters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 33951, "no_votes": 17477, "total_votes": 51428, "percent_yes": 66.01656685074279, "percent_no": 33.98343314925721, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.446030", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.840826", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.140790", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 10.200-10.203 be added to the Anaheim City Charter to require unresolved disputes concerning wages, hours, or terms and conditions of employment between the City and the labor organization representing city firefighters to be submitted to a panel of three independent arbitrators to select the final offer of either the City or the firefighters\u2019 organization which decision would be imposed and become binding upon the City and the firefighters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10648, "fingerprint": "1998|199800156|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800156|ORANGE", "content_hash": "46b452aa0e9f07e7", "measure_id": "199800156", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-180 be adopted which imposes a limit of three consecutive terms on members of the City Council as defined in the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 16269, "no_votes": 3243, "total_votes": 19512, "percent_yes": 83.37945879458795, "percent_no": 16.620541205412053, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.840547", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.140608", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-180 be adopted which imposes a limit of three consecutive terms on members of the City Council as defined in the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12244, "fingerprint": "1998|199800397|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800397|ORANGE", "content_hash": "9d3ef9e4ebda720d", "measure_id": "199800397", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Cypress be amended to add a new Article IX, incorporating into the City Charter certain provisions of the California Government Code, which provisions authorize the City Council to delegate planning powers and functions to a planning commission, administrative body, or hearing officer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4094, "no_votes": 8052, "total_votes": 12146, "percent_yes": 33.706570064218674, "percent_no": 66.29342993578132, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.446455", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.841190", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.140990", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Cypress be amended to add a new Article IX, incorporating into the City Charter certain provisions of the California Government Code, which provisions authorize the City Council to delegate planning powers and functions to a planning commission, administrative body, or hearing officer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10647, "fingerprint": "1998|199800103|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800103|ORANGE", "content_hash": "64aff3d9b756ad52", "measure_id": "199800103", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance for the purpose of providing Law Enforcement Services be adopted extending the special tax on the parcels of property in Three Arch Bay District on the basis of $150 per fiscal year per parcel containing residential or commercial improvements and $100 per fiscal year per parcel for each parcel of vacant land?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 349, "no_votes": 102, "total_votes": 451, "percent_yes": 77.38359201773835, "percent_no": 22.61640798226165, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.840274", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.140427", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance for the purpose of providing Law Enforcement Services be adopted extending the special tax on the parcels of property in Three Arch Bay District on the basis of $150 per fiscal year per parcel containing residential or commercial improvements and $100 per fiscal year per parcel for each parcel of vacant land?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10649, "fingerprint": "1998|199800398|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800398|ORANGE", "content_hash": "443a1e67555b1dc1", "measure_id": "199800398", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sections 419, 800 and 801 of the City Charter be amended to require that, after January 1, 1998, any delegation of planning powers or functions shall not take effect until approved by the voters at an election, and accompanied by a full fiscal analysis of costs, and providing, further, that annual appropriations for delegated planning powers or functions be limited to the amount specified in the cost analysis, increased annually by the rate of inflation?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8025, "no_votes": 4052, "total_votes": 12077, "percent_yes": 66.44862134636085, "percent_no": 33.55137865363915, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.841466", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.141170", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sections 419, 800 and 801 of the City Charter be amended to require that, after January 1, 1998, any delegation of planning powers or functions shall not take effect until approved by the voters at an election, and accompanied by a full fiscal analysis of costs, and providing, further, that annual appropriations for delegated planning powers or functions be limited to the amount specified in the cost analysis, increased annually by the rate of inflation?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10650, "fingerprint": "1998|199800399|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800399|ORANGE", "content_hash": "68ccfa1943e937d5", "measure_id": "199800399", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Irvine advisory resolution no. 98-01, supporting the reuse of MCAS El Toro for non-aviation purposes in accordance with the Millennium Plan, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26737, "no_votes": 6213, "total_votes": 32950, "percent_yes": 81.14415781487102, "percent_no": 18.855842185128978, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.841732", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.141365", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Irvine advisory resolution no. 98-01, supporting the reuse of MCAS El Toro for non-aviation purposes in accordance with the Millennium Plan, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10651, "fingerprint": "1998|199800400|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800400|ORANGE", "content_hash": "40973d819c30f4bc", "measure_id": "199800400", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Los Alamitos be amended to add Section 501A imposing a limit of three consecutive four year terms on Members of the City Council ?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2169, "no_votes": 707, "total_votes": 2876, "percent_yes": 75.41724617524339, "percent_no": 24.582753824756608, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.842003", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.141545", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Los Alamitos be amended to add Section 501A imposing a limit of three consecutive four year terms on Members of the City Council ?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10652, "fingerprint": "1998|199800401|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800401|ORANGE", "content_hash": "f34aecb56982c692", "measure_id": "199800401", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance be adopted which ordains that a person is ineligible to hold office as a member of the City Council if such person has, subsequent to January 1, 1998, served on the City Council for two full terms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1268, "no_votes": 1193, "total_votes": 2461, "percent_yes": 51.523770824867945, "percent_no": 48.476229175132055, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.842268", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.141727", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance be adopted which ordains that a person is ineligible to hold office as a member of the City Council if such person has, subsequent to January 1, 1998, served on the City Council for two full terms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10653, "fingerprint": "1998|199800402|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800402|ORANGE", "content_hash": "10d3c179a6cfd5f4", "measure_id": "199800402", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the city of Westminster continue to collect a business license tax from businesses doing business in the City of Westminster?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13941, "no_votes": 4112, "total_votes": 18053, "percent_yes": 77.22262227884562, "percent_no": 22.77737772115438, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.842538", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.141908", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the city of Westminster continue to collect a business license tax from businesses doing business in the City of Westminster?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10654, "fingerprint": "1998|199800403|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800403|ORANGE", "content_hash": "1b62a66d5b295566", "measure_id": "199800403", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance repealing the prohibition of the sale or use of fireworks in the City of Westminster be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8667, "no_votes": 9528, "total_votes": 18195, "percent_yes": 47.633965375103045, "percent_no": 52.366034624896955, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.842805", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.142092", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance repealing the prohibition of the sale or use of fireworks in the City of Westminster be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10655, "fingerprint": "1998|199800404|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800404|ORANGE", "content_hash": "2a719581598d8ddd", "measure_id": "199800404", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Ordinance amending the General Plan and prohibiting City action to expand or widen Imperial Highway within Yorba Linda be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7337, "no_votes": 12596, "total_votes": 19933, "percent_yes": 36.80830783123464, "percent_no": 63.19169216876536, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.843072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.142273", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Ordinance amending the General Plan and prohibiting City action to expand or widen Imperial Highway within Yorba Linda be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10656, "fingerprint": "1998|199800541|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800541|ORANGE", "content_hash": "74be83e2cd2f6ff3", "measure_id": "199800541", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to renovate facilities to provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, repair and upgrade 30 year old classrooms for student safety, and repair and replace deteriorating plumbing and electrical systems, playground equipment, and classroom lighting, shall the Buena Park School District issue $13.8 million of bonds with the interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction, and acquisition of classrooms and facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5023, "no_votes": 1699, "total_votes": 6722, "percent_yes": 74.72478429038976, "percent_no": 25.275215709610237, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.843407", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.142487", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to renovate facilities to provide students with access to classroom computers and modern technology, repair and upgrade 30 year old classrooms for student safety, and repair and replace deteriorating plumbing and electrical systems, playground equipment, and classroom lighting, shall the Buena Park School District issue $13.8 million of bonds with the interest rate below the legal limit for repair, improvement, construction, and acquisition of classrooms and facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10646, "fingerprint": "1998|199800051|ORANGE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800051|ORANGE", "content_hash": "86ab19a05daf1863", "measure_id": "199800051", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Orange", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve classroom overcrowding, renovate classrooms and provide for safe modern school buildings for Anaheim children, shall the Anaheim City School District be authorized to issue bonds, in a maximum amount not to exceed $48,000,000 at an interest rate within the legal limits, to repair, acquire and construct classrooms, school sites and facilities and with no money allocated for administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5587, "no_votes": 4473, "total_votes": 10060, "percent_yes": 55.53677932405567, "percent_no": 44.46322067594433, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.839968", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.140244", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve classroom overcrowding, renovate classrooms and provide for safe modern school buildings for Anaheim children, shall the Anaheim City School District be authorized to issue bonds, in a maximum amount not to exceed $48,000,000 at an interest rate within the legal limits, to repair, acquire and construct classrooms, school sites and facilities and with no money allocated for administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Orange_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Orange County Elections", "url": "https://www.ocvote.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10658, "fingerprint": "1998|199800212|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800212|PLACER", "content_hash": "79e56c6c3caac78c", "measure_id": "199800212", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding and improve local schools, shall the Loomis Union Elementary School District issue bonds for the construction of H. Clarke Powers Elementary School, for the construction of a multi-purpose facility at Placer School, a multi-purpose facility at Loomis School, and for acquiring improvements to existing facilities at Loomis, Placer, and Franklin Schools in an amount not to exceed $9,300,000 with interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3562, "no_votes": 1558, "total_votes": 5120, "percent_yes": 69.5703125, "percent_no": 30.4296875, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.843981", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.142877", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding and improve local schools, shall the Loomis Union Elementary School District issue bonds for the construction of H. Clarke Powers Elementary School, for the construction of a multi-purpose facility at Placer School, a multi-purpose facility at Loomis School, and for acquiring improvements to existing facilities at Loomis, Placer, and Franklin Schools in an amount not to exceed $9,300,000 with interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10657, "fingerprint": "1998|199800104|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800104|PLACER", "content_hash": "171c89029cb1b429", "measure_id": "199800104", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Northstar Community Services District be authorized to levy a special tax on all real properties within the District not to exceed the sum of $280.00 provided said special tax may be adjusted annually at the beginning of each fiscal year, beginning on July 1, 1999, but not to exceed any increase in the reported U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose (1967=100), or its successor index, for the prior 12 months?  Said tax is to be assessed and collected with Placer County General Taxes commencing with the forthcoming 1998-99 fiscal year and continuing each year thereafter, and shall be used only for those purposes authorized by the California Community Service District law.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59, "no_votes": 16, "total_votes": 75, "percent_yes": 78.66666666666666, "percent_no": 21.333333333333343, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.843678", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.142683", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Northstar Community Services District be authorized to levy a special tax on all real properties within the District not to exceed the sum of $280.00 provided said special tax may be adjusted annually at the beginning of each fiscal year, beginning on July 1, 1999, but not to exceed any increase in the reported U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose (1967=100), or its successor index, for the prior 12 months?  Said tax is to be assessed and collected with Placer County General Taxes commencing with the forthcoming 1998-99 fiscal year and continuing each year thereafter, and shall be used only for those purposes authorized by the California Community Service District law.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10663, "fingerprint": "1998|199800407|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800407|PLACER", "content_hash": "6a233a79490fcd1a", "measure_id": "199800407", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you wish to adopt specified land use changes to Loomis Town policies and regulations in order to allow property near Interstate 80 including that property commonly known as Turtle Island, to be used for highway commercial purposes such as dining, hotel, restaurant, and automotive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 839, "no_votes": 1765, "total_votes": 2604, "percent_yes": 32.21966205837173, "percent_no": 67.78033794162826, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.845404", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.143816", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you wish to adopt specified land use changes to Loomis Town policies and regulations in order to allow property near Interstate 80 including that property commonly known as Turtle Island, to be used for highway commercial purposes such as dining, hotel, restaurant, and automotive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10664, "fingerprint": "1998|199800408|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800408|PLACER", "content_hash": "e0815de2cb7014eb", "measure_id": "199800408", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you want all development in the highway commercial zone to be subject to town approval after public hearings before planning commission and town council and that the Town be able to revise or repeal the highway commercial zone after two rather than seven years, in the event the initiative allowing highway commercial use passes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1496, "no_votes": 1033, "total_votes": 2529, "percent_yes": 59.153815737445626, "percent_no": 40.846184262554374, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.845675", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.143999", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you want all development in the highway commercial zone to be subject to town approval after public hearings before planning commission and town council and that the Town be able to revise or repeal the highway commercial zone after two rather than seven years, in the event the initiative allowing highway commercial use passes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10659, "fingerprint": "1998|199800265|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800265|PLACER", "content_hash": "c8d37c34b74ceeb6", "measure_id": "199800265", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article II, Section 207 of the placer County charter be amended to allow a one time adjustment to the current maximum $30,000.00 compensation cap put in place by the voters of Placer County in 1992, to a maximum of $35,000.00 effective January 1, 1999?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 26647, "no_votes": 47559, "total_votes": 74206, "percent_yes": 35.90949518906827, "percent_no": 64.09050481093173, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.844309", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.143065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article II, Section 207 of the placer County charter be amended to allow a one time adjustment to the current maximum $30,000.00 compensation cap put in place by the voters of Placer County in 1992, to a maximum of $35,000.00 effective January 1, 1999?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10660, "fingerprint": "1998|199800266|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800266|PLACER", "content_hash": "fa842f4d10e9315a", "measure_id": "199800266", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Placer County Code, Chapter 21, Section 21.3 be amended to impose a general tax under the provisions of Government Code Section 53723, which would increase the rate of the Transient Occupancy Tax (a tax imposed only upon overnight visitors to the area for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel/motel) from EIGHT (8%) percent to TEN (10%) percent of the daily room rental for that area legally described as the \u201cWestern Slope Transient Occupancy Tax Area\u201d, to read as set forth in Exhibit \u201cA\u201d of Resolution #98-164 adopted by the Placer County Board of Supervisors on July 14, 1998 and on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9863, "no_votes": 20970, "total_votes": 30833, "percent_yes": 31.98845392923167, "percent_no": 68.01154607076833, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.844595", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.143248", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Placer County Code, Chapter 21, Section 21.3 be amended to impose a general tax under the provisions of Government Code Section 53723, which would increase the rate of the Transient Occupancy Tax (a tax imposed only upon overnight visitors to the area for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel/motel) from EIGHT (8%) percent to TEN (10%) percent of the daily room rental for that area legally described as the \u201cWestern Slope Transient Occupancy Tax Area\u201d, to read as set forth in Exhibit \u201cA\u201d of Resolution #98-164 adopted by the Placer County Board of Supervisors on July 14, 1998 and on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10665, "fingerprint": "1998|199800409|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800409|PLACER", "content_hash": "b4630bb6e4cd5699", "measure_id": "199800409", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the property at 6100 Horseshoe Bar road be rezoned from Downtown Core to General Commercial and the proposed development agreement approved to allow a service station with mini mart, car wash and food service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 767, "no_votes": 1803, "total_votes": 2570, "percent_yes": 29.84435797665369, "percent_no": 70.1556420233463, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.846023", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.144183", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the property at 6100 Horseshoe Bar road be rezoned from Downtown Core to General Commercial and the proposed development agreement approved to allow a service station with mini mart, car wash and food service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10667, "fingerprint": "1998|199800411|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800411|PLACER", "content_hash": "c3d04b75541d74b2", "measure_id": "199800411", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 4.24.030A of the Roseville Municipal Code, relating to the amount of the Transient Occupancy Tax, be amended to raise the amount of the tax charged to those who occupy a hotel room in Roseville from six percent (6.0%) to ten percent (10.0%) on the nightly room rental charged by the hotel operator?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11580, "no_votes": 13292, "total_votes": 24872, "percent_yes": 46.55837889996783, "percent_no": 53.44162110003217, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.846560", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.144545", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 4.24.030A of the Roseville Municipal Code, relating to the amount of the Transient Occupancy Tax, be amended to raise the amount of the tax charged to those who occupy a hotel room in Roseville from six percent (6.0%) to ten percent (10.0%) on the nightly room rental charged by the hotel operator?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10666, "fingerprint": "1998|199800410|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800410|PLACER", "content_hash": "1a0a95a96a3b77b3", "measure_id": "199800410", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue current efforts to keep park and recreation facilities safe, clean and well maintained, shall Rocklin City Ordinance No. 781 be approved which would allow the City to maintain existing levels of funding for parks and recreation by replacing the City?s current annual park maintenance assessments on property owners with a park maintenance tax on the same owners in the same amount for a period of ten years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8458, "no_votes": 2702, "total_votes": 11160, "percent_yes": 75.78853046594982, "percent_no": 24.21146953405018, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.846294", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.144361", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue current efforts to keep park and recreation facilities safe, clean and well maintained, shall Rocklin City Ordinance No. 781 be approved which would allow the City to maintain existing levels of funding for parks and recreation by replacing the City?s current annual park maintenance assessments on property owners with a park maintenance tax on the same owners in the same amount for a period of ten years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10668, "fingerprint": "1998|199800542|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800542|PLACER", "content_hash": "b8706b15db63b016", "measure_id": "199800542", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Auburn Union Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of $13,750,000 in principal amount to bear not exceeding statutory limits, to support an approved Master Plan to:  improve real property at Alta Vista, E. V. Cain and Rock Creek Schools; acquire land and construct a middle school due to increased enrollment; improve classrooms for technology, science, music and art; and other projects; subject to review by a community (taxpayer) based oversight  committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6507, "no_votes": 3971, "total_votes": 10478, "percent_yes": 62.10154609658331, "percent_no": 37.89845390341669, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.846839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.144732", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Auburn Union Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of $13,750,000 in principal amount to bear not exceeding statutory limits, to support an approved Master Plan to:  improve real property at Alta Vista, E. V. Cain and Rock Creek Schools; acquire land and construct a middle school due to increased enrollment; improve classrooms for technology, science, music and art; and other projects; subject to review by a community (taxpayer) based oversight  committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10661, "fingerprint": "1998|199800405|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800405|PLACER", "content_hash": "88f6762990017e2a", "measure_id": "199800405", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Colfax transfer and thereby waive all claim and title to all monies held by the city and any monies and property derived from the Bianchini Estate including any and all principal and interest, to the Sierra Vista Community Center?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 276, "no_votes": 160, "total_votes": 436, "percent_yes": 63.30275229357798, "percent_no": 36.69724770642202, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Authorize Expenditure", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.844871", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.143444", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Colfax transfer and thereby waive all claim and title to all monies held by the city and any monies and property derived from the Bianchini Estate including any and all principal and interest, to the Sierra Vista Community Center?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10662, "fingerprint": "1998|199800406|PLACER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800406|PLACER", "content_hash": "2a3746b373f939f8", "measure_id": "199800406", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Placer", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Lincoln establish a motel occupancy tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1420, "no_votes": 950, "total_votes": 2370, "percent_yes": 59.91561181434599, "percent_no": 40.08438818565401, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.845138", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.143625", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Lincoln establish a motel occupancy tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Placer_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Placer County Elections", "url": "https://www.placerelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10669, "fingerprint": "1998|199800021|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800021|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "1d6e5e68edcfab34", "measure_id": "199800021", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance 685, an ordinance of the people of the City of Rancho Mirage, proposing a replacement tax in the amount of $18.96 per single-family residential unit (or equivalent) to continue funding of city park maintenance be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1088, "no_votes": 476, "total_votes": 1564, "percent_yes": 69.56521739130434, "percent_no": 30.434782608695656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.847109", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.144917", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance 685, an ordinance of the people of the City of Rancho Mirage, proposing a replacement tax in the amount of $18.96 per single-family residential unit (or equivalent) to continue funding of city park maintenance be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10682, "fingerprint": "1998|199800412|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800412|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2bbe222d84099a02", "measure_id": "199800412", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the expiration date in the current utility users tax be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1127, "no_votes": 1218, "total_votes": 2345, "percent_yes": 48.05970149253731, "percent_no": 51.94029850746269, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.850788", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.147294", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the expiration date in the current utility users tax be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10683, "fingerprint": "1998|199800413|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800413|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "4224c0645ecc41e4", "measure_id": "199800413", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do you want the city to (I) fix your existing streets and improve curbs, gutters and pavement for a cost not to exceed $50,000,000 by issuing general obligation bonds with a legal rate of interest and term not to exceed 25 years, and ; (ii) charge volorem taxes on all taxable property within the city at rates which will repay the principal and interest when due?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2551, "no_votes": 3288, "total_votes": 5839, "percent_yes": 43.68898784038362, "percent_no": 56.31101215961638, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.851080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.147476", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do you want the city to (I) fix your existing streets and improve curbs, gutters and pavement for a cost not to exceed $50,000,000 by issuing general obligation bonds with a legal rate of interest and term not to exceed 25 years, and ; (ii) charge volorem taxes on all taxable property within the city at rates which will repay the principal and interest when due?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10670, "fingerprint": "1998|199800052|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800052|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "91b3ad494d552431", "measure_id": "199800052", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve serious overcrowding, reduce class sizes and improve safety conditions by installing smoke alarms and sprinklers, shall the Corona-Norco Unified School District issue $65 million in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit to acquire, repair, construct and upgrade classrooms, libraries and school facilities and replace outdated plumbing, sewer, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems, with no money for salaries, and all expenditures monitored by an independent community oversight committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6913, "no_votes": 2774, "total_votes": 9687, "percent_yes": 71.36368328687932, "percent_no": 28.636316713120678, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.847416", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.145098", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve serious overcrowding, reduce class sizes and improve safety conditions by installing smoke alarms and sprinklers, shall the Corona-Norco Unified School District issue $65 million in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit to acquire, repair, construct and upgrade classrooms, libraries and school facilities and replace outdated plumbing, sewer, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems, with no money for salaries, and all expenditures monitored by an independent community oversight committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10671, "fingerprint": "1998|199800053|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800053|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "98ce24fb22b26097", "measure_id": "199800053", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve serious overcrowding, improve local schools and educational opportunities and provide resources for timely repair of local school facilities, shall the Murrieta Valley Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $37.5 million, at an interest rate within the legal limit, to construct, acquire or improve school sites and facilities, and to repair roofs and renovate plumbing, sewer, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems as needed and upgrade wiring for safety and technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5467, "no_votes": 2178, "total_votes": 7645, "percent_yes": 71.51079136690647, "percent_no": 28.489208633093526, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.847689", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.145282", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve serious overcrowding, improve local schools and educational opportunities and provide resources for timely repair of local school facilities, shall the Murrieta Valley Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $37.5 million, at an interest rate within the legal limit, to construct, acquire or improve school sites and facilities, and to repair roofs and renovate plumbing, sewer, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems as needed and upgrade wiring for safety and technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10679, "fingerprint": "1998|199800214|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800214|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "328b432ee8fd1b3c", "measure_id": "199800214", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Palo Verde Unified School District renovate Palo Verde High School, as well as its existing elementary and middle schools, upgrade deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, cooling, ventilation, and electrical systems; refurbish, construct, and acquire classrooms and school facilities by issuing $10 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit, with no money for salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1478, "no_votes": 557, "total_votes": 2035, "percent_yes": 72.62899262899263, "percent_no": 27.371007371007366, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.849923", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.146744", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Palo Verde Unified School District renovate Palo Verde High School, as well as its existing elementary and middle schools, upgrade deteriorating roofs, plumbing, heating, cooling, ventilation, and electrical systems; refurbish, construct, and acquire classrooms and school facilities by issuing $10 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit, with no money for salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10678, "fingerprint": "1998|199800213|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800213|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "453aa47d91869cc8", "measure_id": "199800213", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Hemet Unified School District be authorized to finance repair and upgrade of older schools to meet Health/Safety/Fire codes and handicapped access; to relieve overcrowding by building two new elementary schools, additional classrooms and support facilities; and to improve access for technology by issuing bonds in the amount of $37.5 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum legal rate?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13376, "no_votes": 9141, "total_votes": 22517, "percent_yes": 59.40400586223742, "percent_no": 40.59599413776258, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.849654", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.146559", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Hemet Unified School District be authorized to finance repair and upgrade of older schools to meet Health/Safety/Fire codes and handicapped access; to relieve overcrowding by building two new elementary schools, additional classrooms and support facilities; and to improve access for technology by issuing bonds in the amount of $37.5 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum legal rate?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10672, "fingerprint": "1998|199800105|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800105|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "7c21619b9364b15f", "measure_id": "199800105", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Riverside County Auditor be elected by the voters or appointed by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors? (Yes=Elected; No=Appointed)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 153644, "no_votes": 50968, "total_votes": 204612, "percent_yes": 75.09041502942154, "percent_no": 24.909584970578464, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.848034", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.145463", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Riverside County Auditor be elected by the voters or appointed by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors? (Yes=Elected; No=Appointed)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10673, "fingerprint": "1998|199800106|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800106|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "86f47600e9fe2b41", "measure_id": "199800106", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Riverside County Treasurer be elected by the voters or appointed by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors?  (Yes=Elected; No=Appointed)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 158240, "no_votes": 45305, "total_votes": 203545, "percent_yes": 77.74202264855438, "percent_no": 22.257977351445618, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.848301", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.145646", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Riverside County Treasurer be elected by the voters or appointed by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors?  (Yes=Elected; No=Appointed)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10674, "fingerprint": "1998|199800107|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800107|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "d8450592b26e010f", "measure_id": "199800107", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Riverside County Tax Collector be elected by the voters or appointed by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors?  (Yes=Elected; No=Appointed)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 156623, "no_votes": 46869, "total_votes": 203492, "percent_yes": 76.96764491970201, "percent_no": 23.03235508029799, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.848570", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.145830", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Riverside County Tax Collector be elected by the voters or appointed by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors?  (Yes=Elected; No=Appointed)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10677, "fingerprint": "1998|199800159|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800159|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "669284ac1418bc82", "measure_id": "199800159", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 14 of the Coachella Fire Protection District propose a special tax for the purpose of fire protection and emergency medical services not to exceed $52.00 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (Tax Unit) for the 1998-99 fiscal year, with future increases limited to the annual increase in the Consumer Price Index for District services, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 431, "no_votes": 652, "total_votes": 1083, "percent_yes": 39.79686057248384, "percent_no": 60.20313942751616, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.849370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.146375", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 14 of the Coachella Fire Protection District propose a special tax for the purpose of fire protection and emergency medical services not to exceed $52.00 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (Tax Unit) for the 1998-99 fiscal year, with future increases limited to the annual increase in the Consumer Price Index for District services, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10675, "fingerprint": "1998|199800157|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800157|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "e559aa6549d0427c", "measure_id": "199800157", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Office of Mayor be Appointed by the City Council or Directly Elected by the Voters?  (Yes=Appointed; No=Elected)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 553, "no_votes": 3694, "total_votes": 4247, "percent_yes": 13.020955968919228, "percent_no": 86.97904403108078, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.848839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.146013", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Office of Mayor be Appointed by the City Council or Directly Elected by the Voters?  (Yes=Appointed; No=Elected)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10676, "fingerprint": "1998|199800158|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800158|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "b384522f0a610159", "measure_id": "199800158", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If Elected : Shall the Term Remain Two Years, or Shall the Term Increase to Four Years?  (Yes=2 years; No=4 years)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2826, "no_votes": 1446, "total_votes": 4272, "percent_yes": 66.15168539325843, "percent_no": 33.84831460674157, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.849105", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.146193", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If Elected : Shall the Term Remain Two Years, or Shall the Term Increase to Four Years?  (Yes=2 years; No=4 years)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10688, "fingerprint": "1998|199800544|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800544|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "6a84fea67189472e", "measure_id": "199800544", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide students with safe and secure schools, and to qualify for State matching funds, should Hemet Unified School District issue $37.5 million in bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?  Bond proceeds will upgrade outdated heating, wiring, and plumbing; and, rehabilitate, improve and/or add school facilities. An independent citizens committee will ensure that bond proceeds are spent only on school facilities and not on administrative salaries.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19161, "no_votes": 12059, "total_votes": 31220, "percent_yes": 61.37411915438822, "percent_no": 38.62588084561178, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.852647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.148413", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide students with safe and secure schools, and to qualify for State matching funds, should Hemet Unified School District issue $37.5 million in bonds at interest rates below the legal limit?  Bond proceeds will upgrade outdated heating, wiring, and plumbing; and, rehabilitate, improve and/or add school facilities. An independent citizens committee will ensure that bond proceeds are spent only on school facilities and not on administrative salaries.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10687, "fingerprint": "1998|199800543|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800543|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "aa6f5c114802d89d", "measure_id": "199800543", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Beaumont Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $16,000,000, at an interest rate within the legal limit, to construct, acquire, expand, modernize or improve school sites and facilities, and to provide resources to timely repair roofs and renovate plumbing, sewer, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems as needed and upgrade wiring for safety and technology?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6506, "no_votes": 2561, "total_votes": 9067, "percent_yes": 71.7547149001875, "percent_no": 28.245285099812506, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.852369", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.148230", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Beaumont Unified School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $16,000,000, at an interest rate within the legal limit, to construct, acquire, expand, modernize or improve school sites and facilities, and to provide resources to timely repair roofs and renovate plumbing, sewer, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems as needed and upgrade wiring for safety and technology?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10680, "fingerprint": "1998|199800267|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800267|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "8760a6790a187f7f", "measure_id": "199800267", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Moreno Valley Community Services District be authorized to increase the annual Zone A parcel fee by $8 to pay for exciting youth and adult recreation programs, parks maintenance and athletic field preparation, with such funds to be programmed specifically to eliminate the funding shortfall in the Zone A fund where parcel fees have not been raised since 1992?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10241, "no_votes": 14524, "total_votes": 24765, "percent_yes": 41.35271552594386, "percent_no": 58.64728447405614, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.850225", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.146931", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Moreno Valley Community Services District be authorized to increase the annual Zone A parcel fee by $8 to pay for exciting youth and adult recreation programs, parks maintenance and athletic field preparation, with such funds to be programmed specifically to eliminate the funding shortfall in the Zone A fund where parcel fees have not been raised since 1992?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10681, "fingerprint": "1998|199800268|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800268|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "2dedc0563d5de566", "measure_id": "199800268", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Moreno Valley Community Services District be authorized to provide public library programs and services through the creation of Zone L, with the clear understanding that approval of this measure will not impose fees since such fees cannot be imposed without explicit voter approval subject to the requirements of Proposition 218?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17027, "no_votes": 6758, "total_votes": 23785, "percent_yes": 71.58713474879126, "percent_no": 28.412865251208743, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.850521", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.147111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Moreno Valley Community Services District be authorized to provide public library programs and services through the creation of Zone L, with the clear understanding that approval of this measure will not impose fees since such fees cannot be imposed without explicit voter approval subject to the requirements of Proposition 218?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10684, "fingerprint": "1998|199800414|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800414|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "c5a0e65e58490d69", "measure_id": "199800414", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Initiative Measure entitled: \u201cAn initiative measure to permit the sale of \u201cSafe and Sane\u201d Fireworks (as defined by state law) by non-profit and school affiliated organizations organized and established within the city limits for at least one year and licensed by the city for such sales, and the possession, use and discharge within the City of Moreno Valley of such fireworks, from June 28 through July 4 of each year, and otherwise regulating the sale and use of such fireworks\u201d be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9710, "no_votes": 14416, "total_votes": 24126, "percent_yes": 40.24703639227389, "percent_no": 59.75296360772611, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.851360", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.147667", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Initiative Measure entitled: \u201cAn initiative measure to permit the sale of \u201cSafe and Sane\u201d Fireworks (as defined by state law) by non-profit and school affiliated organizations organized and established within the city limits for at least one year and licensed by the city for such sales, and the possession, use and discharge within the City of Moreno Valley of such fireworks, from June 28 through July 4 of each year, and otherwise regulating the sale and use of such fireworks\u201d be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10685, "fingerprint": "1998|199800415|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800415|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "78701183cf8ac456", "measure_id": "199800415", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a public safety tax to fund hiring of seven (7) additional fire fighters and to implement a Paramedic Engine company program in an amount of $32.37 per year per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) and to fund hiring of seven (7) additional police officers and four (4) civilian police personnel in an amount of $61.82 per year per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) for a total of $94.19?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6474, "no_votes": 5768, "total_votes": 12242, "percent_yes": 52.88351576539782, "percent_no": 47.11648423460218, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.851627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.147869", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a public safety tax to fund hiring of seven (7) additional fire fighters and to implement a Paramedic Engine company program in an amount of $32.37 per year per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) and to fund hiring of seven (7) additional police officers and four (4) civilian police personnel in an amount of $61.82 per year per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) for a total of $94.19?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10686, "fingerprint": "1998|199800416|RIVERSIDE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800416|RIVERSIDE", "content_hash": "76b805d1cdfbf464", "measure_id": "199800416", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Riverside", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that eliminates building permit and plan check fees for miscellaneous permits such as patio covers, decks and block walls, and reducing residential swimming pool fees and that levies a construction impact tax on new construction for building permit and plan check services set forth in the proposed ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6009, "no_votes": 5215, "total_votes": 11224, "percent_yes": 53.53706343549537, "percent_no": 46.46293656450463, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.851948", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.148050", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that eliminates building permit and plan check fees for miscellaneous permits such as patio covers, decks and block walls, and reducing residential swimming pool fees and that levies a construction impact tax on new construction for building permit and plan check services set forth in the proposed ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Riverside_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Riverside County Elections", "url": "https://www.voteinfo.net", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10691, "fingerprint": "1998|199800110|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800110|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "d22defa09849ff1e", "measure_id": "199800110", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Article XIX be added to the Charter of the County of Sacramento to create a system of binding arbitration for resolution of labor disputes between the County and the Sheriff Law Enforcement Non-Supervisory bargaining unit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 131774, "no_votes": 94106, "total_votes": 225880, "percent_yes": 58.33805560474589, "percent_no": 41.66194439525411, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.853529", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.148962", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Article XIX be added to the Charter of the County of Sacramento to create a system of binding arbitration for resolution of labor disputes between the County and the Sheriff Law Enforcement Non-Supervisory bargaining unit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10692, "fingerprint": "1998|199800111|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800111|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "1b321e8e6bf994ec", "measure_id": "199800111", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "In the event the Sacramento County Charter is amended to require binding arbitration of any labor agreement, shall the Charter also be amended to require voter approval of those provisions of such arbitrated contracts which affect management rights or require tax increases before those provisions shall become effective?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 117642, "no_votes": 101223, "total_votes": 218865, "percent_yes": 53.75094236172984, "percent_no": 46.24905763827016, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.853863", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.149146", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In the event the Sacramento County Charter is amended to require binding arbitration of any labor agreement, shall the Charter also be amended to require voter approval of those provisions of such arbitrated contracts which affect management rights or require tax increases before those provisions shall become effective?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10695, "fingerprint": "1998|199800215|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800215|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "e226bfa4dd249509", "measure_id": "199800215", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, provide students with access to classroom computer and science technology, build permanent classrooms, upgrade and repair schools throughout the District, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Galt Joint Union High School Distinct, be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed $30,000,000 with interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2961, "no_votes": 2054, "total_votes": 5015, "percent_yes": 59.04287138584248, "percent_no": 40.95712861415752, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.854667", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.149749", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to reduce student overcrowding, provide students with access to classroom computer and science technology, build permanent classrooms, upgrade and repair schools throughout the District, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Galt Joint Union High School Distinct, be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed $30,000,000 with interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10693, "fingerprint": "1998|199800160|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800160|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "e9897491dd76e8e0", "measure_id": "199800160", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter of the City of Sacramento be amended to provide mandatory binding arbitration if contract negotiations between recognized city fire fighters organizations and the City administration reach an impasse?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 44004, "no_votes": 27203, "total_votes": 71207, "percent_yes": 61.79729520974061, "percent_no": 38.20270479025939, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.854131", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.149327", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter of the City of Sacramento be amended to provide mandatory binding arbitration if contract negotiations between recognized city fire fighters organizations and the City administration reach an impasse?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10694, "fingerprint": "1998|199800161|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800161|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "d8399783ac684893", "measure_id": "199800161", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to comply with Proposition 218, the Right to Vote on Taxes Act, shall the City of Sacramento replace its current in-lieu franchise and property tax fees on water, sewer, drainage and garbage with a general tax which will not result in any changes to existing city utility rates?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 37941, "no_votes": 31746, "total_votes": 69687, "percent_yes": 54.44487494080676, "percent_no": 45.55512505919324, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.854399", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.149555", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to comply with Proposition 218, the Right to Vote on Taxes Act, shall the City of Sacramento replace its current in-lieu franchise and property tax fees on water, sewer, drainage and garbage with a general tax which will not result in any changes to existing city utility rates?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10690, "fingerprint": "1998|199800109|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800109|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "63bd635f7a1f122e", "measure_id": "199800109", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-1, an ordinance of the Rancho Murieta Community Services District be approved authorizing a special tax for security services to fund continuation of security service by the District, including but not limited to operating 24-hour security gates, providing 24-hour mobile patrol, both 365 days a year, together with ancillary services including assistane to outside agencies, and other services uthorized by the Board to protect its customers and their property?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1349, "no_votes": 411, "total_votes": 1760, "percent_yes": 76.64772727272727, "percent_no": 23.352272727272734, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.853254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.148779", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-1, an ordinance of the Rancho Murieta Community Services District be approved authorizing a special tax for security services to fund continuation of security service by the District, including but not limited to operating 24-hour security gates, providing 24-hour mobile patrol, both 365 days a year, together with ancillary services including assistane to outside agencies, and other services uthorized by the Board to protect its customers and their property?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10689, "fingerprint": "1998|199800108|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800108|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "8b646264ab8002ed", "measure_id": "199800108", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-2, an ordinance of the Rancho Murieta Community Services District be approved authorizing a special tax for drainage services to fund continuation of drainage service by the District, including operation, maintenance, repair or replacement of the drainage system, including culverts, natural and constructed channels, pipes, drain inlets, pump stations, floodways, levees and all other appropriate facilities, and pay for, including but not limited to, power, customer service, administration, overhead, and debt service?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1398, "no_votes": 363, "total_votes": 1761, "percent_yes": 79.38671209540034, "percent_no": 20.61328790459966, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.852925", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.148593", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 98-2, an ordinance of the Rancho Murieta Community Services District be approved authorizing a special tax for drainage services to fund continuation of drainage service by the District, including operation, maintenance, repair or replacement of the drainage system, including culverts, natural and constructed channels, pipes, drain inlets, pump stations, floodways, levees and all other appropriate facilities, and pay for, including but not limited to, power, customer service, administration, overhead, and debt service?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10696, "fingerprint": "1998|199800269|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800269|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "a0d3656f3e3af3f1", "measure_id": "199800269", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Sacramento, to maintain essential services such as police, sheriff and fire protection services, be authorized to increase the County sales tax by 1/4 cent for a maximum of 6 years for general governmental purposes, provided that all sales tax expenditures be independently audited each year with the full audit report published in local newspapers showing how all funds are specifically spent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 103292, "no_votes": 220712, "total_votes": 324004, "percent_yes": 31.87985333514401, "percent_no": 68.120146664856, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.854938", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.149939", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Sacramento, to maintain essential services such as police, sheriff and fire protection services, be authorized to increase the County sales tax by 1/4 cent for a maximum of 6 years for general governmental purposes, provided that all sales tax expenditures be independently audited each year with the full audit report published in local newspapers showing how all funds are specifically spent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10697, "fingerprint": "1998|199800417|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800417|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "ef7c87807fb07db8", "measure_id": "199800417", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Citrus Heights\u2019 base year appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 1997/98 be established $20,316,283?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15906, "no_votes": 5706, "total_votes": 21612, "percent_yes": 73.59800111049417, "percent_no": 26.401998889505833, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Gann Limit", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.855209", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.150119", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Citrus Heights\u2019 base year appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 1997/98 be established $20,316,283?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Gann Limit", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10698, "fingerprint": "1998|199800545|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800545|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "1b46f95095df2fc5", "measure_id": "199800545", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce student overcrowding, provide students with access to classroom computer and science technology, build permanent classrooms, upgrade and repair schools throughout the District, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Galt Joint Union High School Distinct, issue $30 million of bonds  at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and no money goes to administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4191, "no_votes": 2645, "total_votes": 6836, "percent_yes": 61.30778232884728, "percent_no": 38.69221767115272, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.855572", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.150306", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce student overcrowding, provide students with access to classroom computer and science technology, build permanent classrooms, upgrade and repair schools throughout the District, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Galt Joint Union High School Distinct, issue $30 million of bonds  at interest rates below the legal limit so long as spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizens\u2019 oversight committee and no money goes to administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10699, "fingerprint": "1998|199800546|SACRAMENTO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800546|SACRAMENTO", "content_hash": "5f89c5beeaf89281", "measure_id": "199800546", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sacramento", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe and healthy classrooms in Carmichael, Orangevale, Citrus Heights, Arden-Arcade, Gold River, and Fair Oaks by replacing aging roofs, upgrading electrical, heating, and ventilation systems to current health/safety standards and providing other critical repairs, shall the San Juan Unified School District issue $157,000,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, and appoint a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and independent auditor to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements, no district salaries or administration?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 80429, "no_votes": 31145, "total_votes": 111574, "percent_yes": 72.0857905963755, "percent_no": 27.914209403624497, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.855886", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.150497", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe and healthy classrooms in Carmichael, Orangevale, Citrus Heights, Arden-Arcade, Gold River, and Fair Oaks by replacing aging roofs, upgrading electrical, heating, and ventilation systems to current health/safety standards and providing other critical repairs, shall the San Juan Unified School District issue $157,000,000 in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, and appoint a citizens\u2019 oversight committee and independent auditor to guarantee funds are spent only on school improvements, no district salaries or administration?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sacramento_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sacramento County Elections", "url": "https://elections.saccounty.gov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10701, "fingerprint": "1998|199800216|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800216|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "0ed466880eed3473", "measure_id": "199800216", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Cabrillo Community College District repair and rehabilitate its school facilities to meet current health, safety, accessibility, and instructional standards including aging roofs, inadequate lighting, deteriorated plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; refurbish classrooms, laboratories, restrooms, vocational training facilities; and construct and acquire other facilities and sites by issuing $85 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 218, "no_votes": 142, "total_votes": 360, "percent_yes": 60.55555555555555, "percent_no": 39.44444444444445, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.856472", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.150883", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Cabrillo Community College District repair and rehabilitate its school facilities to meet current health, safety, accessibility, and instructional standards including aging roofs, inadequate lighting, deteriorated plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; refurbish classrooms, laboratories, restrooms, vocational training facilities; and construct and acquire other facilities and sites by issuing $85 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10702, "fingerprint": "1998|199800217|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800217|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "576d522177161698", "measure_id": "199800217", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To give students greater access to computer technology, build new academic and vocational classrooms, provide students with improved education and job training opportunities, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $19 mission of bonds at interest rates bellow the legal limit for repair, improvement,  construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 60, "no_votes": 42, "total_votes": 102, "percent_yes": 58.82352941176471, "percent_no": 41.17647058823529, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.856741", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.151072", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To give students greater access to computer technology, build new academic and vocational classrooms, provide students with improved education and job training opportunities, construct and expand school libraries, and repair classroom heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, shall the West Hills Community College District issue $19 mission of bonds at interest rates bellow the legal limit for repair, improvement,  construction and acquisition of classrooms and school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10700, "fingerprint": "1998|199800112|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800112|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "044e46ddfc8b225d", "measure_id": "199800112", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall a sales and  use tax of one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) be established to generate supplemental revenue for the county library to increase library open hours, to expand bookmobile services, to provide future funding for the replacement of the bookmobile, to increase the funding for books and materials budgets, to expand library programs and operations, to fund the construction of new library facilities, and to increase the funding for library services in San Juan Bautista; shall the state-mandated annual spending limit be increased by an amount of revenue generated by the sales and use tax; and shall the sales and use tax be eliminated at the end of ten (10) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6054, "no_votes": 4942, "total_votes": 10996, "percent_yes": 55.05638413968717, "percent_no": 44.94361586031283, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.856160", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.150692", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a sales and  use tax of one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) be established to generate supplemental revenue for the county library to increase library open hours, to expand bookmobile services, to provide future funding for the replacement of the bookmobile, to increase the funding for books and materials budgets, to expand library programs and operations, to fund the construction of new library facilities, and to increase the funding for library services in San Juan Bautista; shall the state-mandated annual spending limit be increased by an amount of revenue generated by the sales and use tax; and shall the sales and use tax be eliminated at the end of ten (10) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10703, "fingerprint": "1998|199800270|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800270|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "21410dea6ca56a1e", "measure_id": "199800270", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Council of San Benito County Governments impose a one-half of one percent (1/2%) transactions and use tax for a period of ten (10) years in order to fund a portion of a state highway project on State Highway Route 25 (widening Route 25 to four (4) lanes) and to repair existing local roads; establish the state-mandated annual spending limit of $20,000,000; and eliminate the transactions and use tax after ten (10) years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7153, "no_votes": 5537, "total_votes": 12690, "percent_yes": 56.3672182821119, "percent_no": 43.6327817178881, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.857191", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.151257", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Council of San Benito County Governments impose a one-half of one percent (1/2%) transactions and use tax for a period of ten (10) years in order to fund a portion of a state highway project on State Highway Route 25 (widening Route 25 to four (4) lanes) and to repair existing local roads; establish the state-mandated annual spending limit of $20,000,000; and eliminate the transactions and use tax after ten (10) years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10704, "fingerprint": "1998|199800418|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800418|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "831a70835ed03e1e", "measure_id": "199800418", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive, rather than elective?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 179, "no_votes": 331, "total_votes": 510, "percent_yes": 35.09803921568627, "percent_no": 64.90196078431373, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.857539", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.151448", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive, rather than elective?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10705, "fingerprint": "1998|199800419|SAN BENITO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800419|SAN BENITO", "content_hash": "23fdacb4c04bf805", "measure_id": "199800419", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Benito", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive rather than elective?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 166, "no_votes": 346, "total_votes": 512, "percent_yes": 32.421875, "percent_no": 67.578125, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.857875", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.151632", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive rather than elective?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Benito_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10709, "fingerprint": "1998|199800162|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800162|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "5a5efa5922f764af", "measure_id": "199800162", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance calling for the Montclair Municipal Elections to be held in March of odd-numbered years be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 490, "no_votes": 2318, "total_votes": 2808, "percent_yes": 17.45014245014245, "percent_no": 82.54985754985755, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.859328", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.152823", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance calling for the Montclair Municipal Elections to be held in March of odd-numbered years be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10710, "fingerprint": "1998|199800163|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800163|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "73a765c834cea13f", "measure_id": "199800163", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance calling for the Montclair General Municipal Elections to be held in November of odd-numbered years be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 665, "no_votes": 2064, "total_votes": 2729, "percent_yes": 24.36790032979113, "percent_no": 75.63209967020887, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.859656", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.153010", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance calling for the Montclair General Municipal Elections to be held in November of odd-numbered years be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10711, "fingerprint": "1998|199800164|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800164|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "7977816139df39d8", "measure_id": "199800164", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance calling for the Montclair General Municipal Elections to be held in November of even-numbered years be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1442, "no_votes": 1213, "total_votes": 2655, "percent_yes": 54.31261770244821, "percent_no": 45.68738229755179, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.859954", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.153192", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance calling for the Montclair General Municipal Elections to be held in November of even-numbered years be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10712, "fingerprint": "1998|199800165|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800165|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "9095518aeafd432b", "measure_id": "199800165", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City of Montclair Ordinance No. 91.702, as amended, providing for a Utility Users Tax, be repealed effective December 31, 1998?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1177, "no_votes": 1851, "total_votes": 3028, "percent_yes": 38.87054161162483, "percent_no": 61.12945838837517, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.860244", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.153376", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City of Montclair Ordinance No. 91.702, as amended, providing for a Utility Users Tax, be repealed effective December 31, 1998?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10714, "fingerprint": "1998|199800167|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800167|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "14d76c44c2ad7ee5", "measure_id": "199800167", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1877 of the City of Victorville which establishes and authorizes the levying of a public safety, police and fire services special tax to finance the City\u2019s public safety, police and fire services s follows be adopted?  Single Family Residence: $86.29/year; Multi-family: 47.26/unit (not to exceed $9,452 - 100 units); Commercial & Industrial: .052/square foot/year (not to exceed $10,400 - 200,000 sq. ft.); Vacant Land: 17.28/acre/year (not to exceed $432.00 - 25 acres)", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1943, "no_votes": 5416, "total_votes": 7359, "percent_yes": 26.40304389183313, "percent_no": 73.59695610816686, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.860839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.153738", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1877 of the City of Victorville which establishes and authorizes the levying of a public safety, police and fire services special tax to finance the City\u2019s public safety, police and fire services s follows be adopted?  Single Family Residence: $86.29/year; Multi-family: 47.26/unit (not to exceed $9,452 - 100 units); Commercial & Industrial: .052/square foot/year (not to exceed $10,400 - 200,000 sq. ft.); Vacant Land: 17.28/acre/year (not to exceed $432.00 - 25 acres)", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10708, "fingerprint": "1998|199800113|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800113|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "42b0a30772250eaf", "measure_id": "199800113", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "(1) Shall Measure 'F' of the Big River Community Services District, proposing a special tax levied upon the parcels within the District not to exceed $36.00 per parcel or possessory interest parcel for the 1998-99 fiscal year, with future increases limited to any annual increase in the Consumer Price index for the purpose of replacing assessments currently levied for District services, and (2) an expenditure limit for the proceeds of any special or other taxes of $500,000 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 174, "no_votes": 105, "total_votes": 279, "percent_yes": 62.36559139784946, "percent_no": 37.63440860215054, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.858945", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.152625", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "(1) Shall Measure 'F' of the Big River Community Services District, proposing a special tax levied upon the parcels within the District not to exceed $36.00 per parcel or possessory interest parcel for the 1998-99 fiscal year, with future increases limited to any annual increase in the Consumer Price index for the purpose of replacing assessments currently levied for District services, and (2) an expenditure limit for the proceeds of any special or other taxes of $500,000 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10717, "fingerprint": "1998|199800420|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800420|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "ebed1ac7aeecb461", "measure_id": "199800420", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance number 320 prepared and proposed by the City Council of the City of Adelanto be Adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 725, "no_votes": 1056, "total_votes": 1781, "percent_yes": 40.707467714766985, "percent_no": 59.292532285233015, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.861754", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.154306", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance number 320 prepared and proposed by the City Council of the City of Adelanto be Adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10718, "fingerprint": "1998|199800421|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800421|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "6a7473e5355a267e", "measure_id": "199800421", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the decision of the City Council of the City of Big Bear Lake on April 13, 1998, to approve the Plot Plan and Design Review Application 98-16/PPR/DRE and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Fire Station Headquarters Building at 40870 Big Bear Boulevard be overturned?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1002, "no_votes": 922, "total_votes": 1924, "percent_yes": 52.07900207900208, "percent_no": 47.92099792099792, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.862061", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.154490", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the decision of the City Council of the City of Big Bear Lake on April 13, 1998, to approve the Plot Plan and Design Review Application 98-16/PPR/DRE and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Fire Station Headquarters Building at 40870 Big Bear Boulevard be overturned?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10719, "fingerprint": "1998|199800422|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800422|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b7d2b3116e5e998d", "measure_id": "199800422", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If Measure \u201cH\u201d is approved by the voters overturning the City of Big Bear Lake\u2019s approval of the plot plan/design review for a fire station at 40870 Big Bear Boulevard (the \"Knickerbockers\u201d site), shall Ordinance No. FP 98-2 of the Big Bear Lake Fire Protection District be adopted to authorize the levy of a special tax in an annual amount up to $15.00 per parcel for ten years to raise additional funds of $950,000 for the construction of a fire station at an alternative site, located at 41090 Big Bear Boulevard (the \u201cMain Street\u201d site)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 398, "no_votes": 1434, "total_votes": 1832, "percent_yes": 21.72489082969432, "percent_no": 78.27510917030568, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.862338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.154675", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If Measure \u201cH\u201d is approved by the voters overturning the City of Big Bear Lake\u2019s approval of the plot plan/design review for a fire station at 40870 Big Bear Boulevard (the \"Knickerbockers\u201d site), shall Ordinance No. FP 98-2 of the Big Bear Lake Fire Protection District be adopted to authorize the levy of a special tax in an annual amount up to $15.00 per parcel for ten years to raise additional funds of $950,000 for the construction of a fire station at an alternative site, located at 41090 Big Bear Boulevard (the \u201cMain Street\u201d site)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10720, "fingerprint": "1998|199800423|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800423|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "3bbe4fdd234b3dcd", "measure_id": "199800423", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall James B. Grimsby be recalled from the Office of Councilmember, District 6 (term ending November 2000)?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 354, "no_votes": 357, "total_votes": 711, "percent_yes": 49.78902953586498, "percent_no": 50.21097046413502, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.862697", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.154869", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall James B. Grimsby be recalled from the Office of Councilmember, District 6 (term ending November 2000)?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10721, "fingerprint": "1998|199800424|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800424|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "d355196bb48b2c65", "measure_id": "199800424", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters of Fontana ratify approve and continue the City\u2019s existing 5% Utility Users\u2019 Tax enacting an Ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7049, "no_votes": 7683, "total_votes": 14732, "percent_yes": 47.84822155851208, "percent_no": 52.15177844148792, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.862970", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.155051", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters of Fontana ratify approve and continue the City\u2019s existing 5% Utility Users\u2019 Tax enacting an Ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10722, "fingerprint": "1998|199800425|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800425|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "f5a0a7222daf3418", "measure_id": "199800425", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 237 be adopted, establishing a business license tax on rock, sand and gravel (aggregate) processed and/or extracted in the City of Highland, at a graduated rate starting at $.06 per ton, not to exceed $.35 per ton, as outlined in Ordinance No. 237?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4517, "no_votes": 3605, "total_votes": 8122, "percent_yes": 55.61438069441025, "percent_no": 44.38561930558975, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Business Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.863239", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.155238", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 237 be adopted, establishing a business license tax on rock, sand and gravel (aggregate) processed and/or extracted in the City of Highland, at a graduated rate starting at $.06 per ton, not to exceed $.35 per ton, as outlined in Ordinance No. 237?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Business Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10723, "fingerprint": "1998|199800426|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800426|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "15128272a559b99b", "measure_id": "199800426", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Montclair Utility Users Tax be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1974, "no_votes": 2709, "total_votes": 4683, "percent_yes": 42.152466367713, "percent_no": 57.847533632287, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.863509", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.155422", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Montclair Utility Users Tax be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10724, "fingerprint": "1998|199800427|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800427|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "7a477817b1ce8fac", "measure_id": "199800427", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which increases the existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 7% to 9%, with the proceeds from the 2% increase to be divided equally between the Twenty-nine Palms Chamber or Commerce and Economic Team 29 to be used to fund economic development activities benefiting the community?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1336, "no_votes": 1012, "total_votes": 2348, "percent_yes": 56.899488926746166, "percent_no": 43.100511073253834, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.863779", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.155601", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which increases the existing Transient Occupancy Tax from 7% to 9%, with the proceeds from the 2% increase to be divided equally between the Twenty-nine Palms Chamber or Commerce and Economic Team 29 to be used to fund economic development activities benefiting the community?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10725, "fingerprint": "1998|199800428|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800428|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c20b37f1589d97f1", "measure_id": "199800428", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the storm water utility fee established pursuant to Upland Ordinance No. 1628 be set at zero ($0.00) for all parcels of real property subject thereto?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9708, "no_votes": 6617, "total_votes": 16325, "percent_yes": 59.46707503828485, "percent_no": 40.53292496171515, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.864102", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.155783", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the storm water utility fee established pursuant to Upland Ordinance No. 1628 be set at zero ($0.00) for all parcels of real property subject thereto?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10716, "fingerprint": "1998|199800271|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800271|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "b6a6c51e5193ecc4", "measure_id": "199800271", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Measure 'P' of the Big River Community Service District, proposing a special tax levied upon the parcels within the District NOT TO EXCEED $36.00 per parcel or possessory interest parcel for the 1999-2000 fiscal year, and an expenditure limit for the proceeds of any special tax or other taxes of $175,000 be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 179, "no_votes": 87, "total_votes": 266, "percent_yes": 67.29323308270678, "percent_no": 32.70676691729322, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.861475", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.154121", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Measure 'P' of the Big River Community Service District, proposing a special tax levied upon the parcels within the District NOT TO EXCEED $36.00 per parcel or possessory interest parcel for the 1999-2000 fiscal year, and an expenditure limit for the proceeds of any special tax or other taxes of $175,000 be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10706, "fingerprint": "1998|199800010|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800010|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "2995daafb741245c", "measure_id": "199800010", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance repealing Chapter 3.52 and adding Chapter 3.54 to the San Bernadino Municipal Code be approved so as to permit the City of San Bernadino to continue to collect and use the transient lodging tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10129, "no_votes": 2390, "total_votes": 12519, "percent_yes": 80.90901829219587, "percent_no": 19.090981707804133, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-02-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.858226", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.152017", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance repealing Chapter 3.52 and adding Chapter 3.54 to the San Bernadino Municipal Code be approved so as to permit the City of San Bernadino to continue to collect and use the transient lodging tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10707, "fingerprint": "1998|199800054|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800054|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "c762ad76e48886a5", "measure_id": "199800054", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding, repair local schools and improve safety conditions for our students, shall Chaffey Joint Union High School District acquire, repair, construct and upgrade school facilities, including adding classrooms; building additional schools; improving fire alarms and security systems; upgrading electrical wiring; renovating water and sewer lines; improving heating, cooling and plumbing systems; renovating restrooms; and replacing worn roofs by issuing $128 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7519, "no_votes": 3044, "total_votes": 10563, "percent_yes": 71.1824292341191, "percent_no": 28.8175707658809, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.858618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.152422", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding, repair local schools and improve safety conditions for our students, shall Chaffey Joint Union High School District acquire, repair, construct and upgrade school facilities, including adding classrooms; building additional schools; improving fire alarms and security systems; upgrading electrical wiring; renovating water and sewer lines; improving heating, cooling and plumbing systems; renovating restrooms; and replacing worn roofs by issuing $128 million of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10715, "fingerprint": "1998|199800218|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800218|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "4c1be8f1d4a356cf", "measure_id": "199800218", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, to repair and upgrade schools throughout the district, some of which are 71 years old, make the district eligible to receive state matching funds, provide access to modern computer technology, build permanent classrooms, and implement class size reduction, shall the Needles Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed $6,819,604 with the interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1149, "no_votes": 240, "total_votes": 1389, "percent_yes": 82.72138228941685, "percent_no": 17.27861771058315, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.861200", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.153934", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to acquire, construct, and improve school facilities, to repair and upgrade schools throughout the district, some of which are 71 years old, make the district eligible to receive state matching funds, provide access to modern computer technology, build permanent classrooms, and implement class size reduction, shall the Needles Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds in the maximum amount not to exceed $6,819,604 with the interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10713, "fingerprint": "1998|199800166|SAN BERNARDINO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800166|SAN BERNARDINO", "content_hash": "1f0d52e4ad909a82", "measure_id": "199800166", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Bernardino", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall General Municipal Elections in the City of Montclair continue to be held in November of even-numbered years and to be consolidated with the statewide General Election?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2513, "no_votes": 515, "total_votes": 3028, "percent_yes": 82.99207397622193, "percent_no": 17.00792602377807, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.860534", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.153555", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall General Municipal Elections in the City of Montclair continue to be held in November of even-numbered years and to be consolidated with the statewide General Election?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Bernardino_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Bernardino County Elections", "url": "https://www.sbcountyelections.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10726, "fingerprint": "1998|199800005|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800005|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7099b967bfd9f17f", "measure_id": "199800005", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Gloria Chadwick be recalled (removed) from the Governing board for Dehesa School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 195, "no_votes": 131, "total_votes": 326, "percent_yes": 59.8159509202454, "percent_no": 40.1840490797546, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-01-13", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.864370", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.155962", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Gloria Chadwick be recalled (removed) from the Governing board for Dehesa School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10727, "fingerprint": "1998|199800006|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800006|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "50ab71c377a5d7de", "measure_id": "199800006", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Loretta M. Belt be recalled (removed) from the Governing board for Dehesa School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 181, "no_votes": 131, "total_votes": 312, "percent_yes": 58.01282051282052, "percent_no": 41.98717948717948, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-01-13", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.864685", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.156141", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Loretta M. Belt be recalled (removed) from the Governing board for Dehesa School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10728, "fingerprint": "1998|199800007|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800007|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a4353500c7e52e46", "measure_id": "199800007", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Cheryl A. Minshew be recalled (removed) from the Governing board for Dehesa School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 197, "no_votes": 129, "total_votes": 326, "percent_yes": 60.42944785276073, "percent_no": 39.57055214723927, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-01-13", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.864954", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.156320", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Cheryl A. Minshew be recalled (removed) from the Governing board for Dehesa School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10729, "fingerprint": "1998|199800008|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800008|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7ca7a9c6c746aeb8", "measure_id": "199800008", "measure_letter": "4", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Irene M. Harper be recalled (removed) from the Governing board for Dehesa School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 200, "no_votes": 126, "total_votes": 326, "percent_yes": 61.34969325153374, "percent_no": 38.65030674846626, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-01-13", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.865219", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.156499", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Irene M. Harper be recalled (removed) from the Governing board for Dehesa School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10742, "fingerprint": "1998|199800219|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800219|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c1f8f3f2c1db5fbb", "measure_id": "199800219", "measure_letter": "5", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall NADIA Q. DAVIES be recalled from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 54561, "no_votes": 16922, "total_votes": 71483, "percent_yes": 76.32723864415316, "percent_no": 23.672761355846845, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.869530", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.159232", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall NADIA Q. DAVIES be recalled from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12247, "fingerprint": "1998|199800273|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800273|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f39f91c9be5c1161", "measure_id": "199800273", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the San Diego county Charter be amended to change the positions of Auditor and Controller and his or her principal assistants from the Classified Service (Civil Service System) to the Unclassified Service (non-Civil Service System) of the County?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 331990, "no_votes": 264219, "total_votes": 596209, "percent_yes": 55.68349354001701, "percent_no": 44.31650645998299, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.475857", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.870342", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.159781", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Diego county Charter be amended to change the positions of Auditor and Controller and his or her principal assistants from the Classified Service (Civil Service System) to the Unclassified Service (non-Civil Service System) of the County?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12246, "fingerprint": "1998|199800169|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800169|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "4187e17f574a3461", "measure_id": "199800169", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 0-18443 (n.s.) be approved to allow the expansion of the San Diego Convention Center?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 126589, "no_votes": 77635, "total_votes": 204224, "percent_yes": 61.985369006581, "percent_no": 38.014630993419, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.474193", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.868909", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.158860", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 0-18443 (n.s.) be approved to allow the expansion of the San Diego Convention Center?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10731, "fingerprint": "1998|199800056|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800056|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7b8499a91dbd3a7d", "measure_id": "199800056", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Cardiff School District acquire, construct, repair, and modernize classrooms and schools, repair and upgrade deteriorating plumbing, heating and ventilation systems, accommodate classroom computers and modern technology, reduce class size, and allow the district to be eligible for state matching funds by issuing $15.8 million in bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1323, "no_votes": 801, "total_votes": 2124, "percent_yes": 62.28813559322034, "percent_no": 37.71186440677966, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.865797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.156863", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Cardiff School District acquire, construct, repair, and modernize classrooms and schools, repair and upgrade deteriorating plumbing, heating and ventilation systems, accommodate classroom computers and modern technology, reduce class size, and allow the district to be eligible for state matching funds by issuing $15.8 million in bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10756, "fingerprint": "1998|199800450|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800450|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f3155a724f66fdf5", "measure_id": "199800450", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Fanita Ranch essential elements in the Santee General Plan be amended to eliminate the minimum lot sizes, to exclude development north of the SDG&E power lines, to set maximum density at 1,227 units (excluding bonuses for affordable housing) clustered on the southern portion of the site adjacent to existing development, and to eliminate the northerly extensions of Fanita Parkway and Cuyamaca Street into Fanita Ranch?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6356, "no_votes": 10008, "total_votes": 16364, "percent_yes": 38.841359080909314, "percent_no": 61.158640919090686, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.879999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.163972", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Fanita Ranch essential elements in the Santee General Plan be amended to eliminate the minimum lot sizes, to exclude development north of the SDG&E power lines, to set maximum density at 1,227 units (excluding bonuses for affordable housing) clustered on the southern portion of the site adjacent to existing development, and to eliminate the northerly extensions of Fanita Parkway and Cuyamaca Street into Fanita Ranch?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12248, "fingerprint": "1998|199800274|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800274|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "c8b765df6c7121e7", "measure_id": "199800274", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Rural Heritage and Watershed Initiative be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 251942, "no_votes": 369958, "total_votes": 621900, "percent_yes": 40.5116578228011, "percent_no": 59.4883421771989, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.476146", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.870612", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.159965", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Rural Heritage and Watershed Initiative be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12245, "fingerprint": "1998|199800168|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800168|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "9838d63a59858129", "measure_id": "199800168", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the structure, the Split Pavilion, more commonly known as the \u201cBars\u201d be removed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11628, "no_votes": 5231, "total_votes": 16859, "percent_yes": 68.9720623999051, "percent_no": 31.0279376000949, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.473907", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.868586", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.158677", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the structure, the Split Pavilion, more commonly known as the \u201cBars\u201d be removed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10730, "fingerprint": "1998|199800055|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800055|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "fa84f6e84d3f857f", "measure_id": "199800055", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to finance facilities for school uses as well as community use, shall the Borrego Springs Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $2.75 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law, to be used for the construction and acquisition of a gymnasium and middle school facilities to reduce classroom overcrowding?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97, "no_votes": 280, "total_votes": 377, "percent_yes": 25.72944297082228, "percent_no": 74.27055702917772, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.865486", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.156680", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to finance facilities for school uses as well as community use, shall the Borrego Springs Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $2.75 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law, to be used for the construction and acquisition of a gymnasium and middle school facilities to reduce classroom overcrowding?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10757, "fingerprint": "1998|199800451|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800451|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7731bdec1a3078b0", "measure_id": "199800451", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the resolution be adopted titled, ?A resolution of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, amending the land use element of the Solana Beach General Plan by changing the land use plan designation for certain property at the northwestern end of North Cedros Avenue from medium high residential to special commercial?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2234, "no_votes": 3023, "total_votes": 5257, "percent_yes": 42.49571999239109, "percent_no": 57.50428000760891, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.880497", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.164154", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the resolution be adopted titled, ?A resolution of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, amending the land use element of the Solana Beach General Plan by changing the land use plan designation for certain property at the northwestern end of North Cedros Avenue from medium high residential to special commercial?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12249, "fingerprint": "1998|199800436|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800436|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a9d7e70205c6a028", "measure_id": "199800436", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the City of San Diego to enter into agreements to redevelop an area of downtown, and construct a multiple use ballpark, provided that:  1) the City\u2019s participation requires no new taxes, is capped, and also limited to redevelopment\u2019s funds and an amount equivalent to certain hotel tax revenue; and 2) the San Diego Padres guarantee substantial private contribution; pay all ballpark construction cost overruns, and play in San Diego until 2024?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 195490, "no_votes": 132272, "total_votes": 327762, "percent_yes": 59.64388794308066, "percent_no": 40.35611205691934, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.478682", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.873261", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.161402", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted authorizing the City of San Diego to enter into agreements to redevelop an area of downtown, and construct a multiple use ballpark, provided that:  1) the City\u2019s participation requires no new taxes, is capped, and also limited to redevelopment\u2019s funds and an amount equivalent to certain hotel tax revenue; and 2) the San Diego Padres guarantee substantial private contribution; pay all ballpark construction cost overruns, and play in San Diego until 2024?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10737, "fingerprint": "1998|199800119|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800119|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "a8e7336dfbc7f3ec", "measure_id": "199800119", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying the countywide costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 84172, "no_votes": 65592, "total_votes": 149764, "percent_yes": 56.20309286610935, "percent_no": 43.79690713389065, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.867506", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.157957", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying the countywide costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10758, "fingerprint": "1998|199800452|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800452|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "3bfa9aa1f41c2c7d", "measure_id": "199800452", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be adopted titled, \u201cAn ordinance of the City of Solana Beach, California, Amending Section 4.3 of the General plan Introduction and Section 2.2.5 of the General plan Land Use Element to make General Plan Amendments that Meet or Exceed Certain Traffic, Acreage or Project Size Thresholds Subject to a Vote of the People?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2562, "no_votes": 2467, "total_votes": 5029, "percent_yes": 50.94452177371247, "percent_no": 49.05547822628753, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.881010", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.164334", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be adopted titled, \u201cAn ordinance of the City of Solana Beach, California, Amending Section 4.3 of the General plan Introduction and Section 2.2.5 of the General plan Land Use Element to make General Plan Amendments that Meet or Exceed Certain Traffic, Acreage or Project Size Thresholds Subject to a Vote of the People?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12250, "fingerprint": "1998|199800437|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800437|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "26a8a46f5340dabd", "measure_id": "199800437", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance O-18573 (New Services) be adopted amending the 30-foot height limit in the Coastal Zone to allow Sea World to plan and construct exhibits, attractions and educational facilities only upon that land leased from the City, provided:  the improvements are subject to City and Coastal Commission approval and do not exceed 1/2 the height of the existing Sea World Sky Tower; and, no taxpayer funds are spent for any improvements resulting from this initiative?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 154043, "no_votes": 149636, "total_votes": 303679, "percent_yes": 50.72560170443132, "percent_no": 49.27439829556868, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.479048", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.873878", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.161588", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance O-18573 (New Services) be adopted amending the 30-foot height limit in the Coastal Zone to allow Sea World to plan and construct exhibits, attractions and educational facilities only upon that land leased from the City, provided:  the improvements are subject to City and Coastal Commission approval and do not exceed 1/2 the height of the existing Sea World Sky Tower; and, no taxpayer funds are spent for any improvements resulting from this initiative?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10738, "fingerprint": "1998|199800120|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800120|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ea93409fc652cb97", "measure_id": "199800120", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying unincorporated area's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 43256, "no_votes": 34468, "total_votes": 77724, "percent_yes": 55.65333745046574, "percent_no": 44.34666254953426, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.867777", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.158139", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying unincorporated area's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10744, "fingerprint": "1998|199800272|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800272|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "defa70bcd3d93011", "measure_id": "199800272", "measure_letter": "DD", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire proteciton and emergency medical services within County Service Area 112--Campo be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 213, "no_votes": 119, "total_votes": 332, "percent_yes": 64.1566265060241, "percent_no": 35.8433734939759, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.870072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.159597", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance for funding structural fire proteciton and emergency medical services within County Service Area 112--Campo be approved establishing special taxes not exceeding the amounts set forth in the ordinance?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12251, "fingerprint": "1998|199800438|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800438|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f5524ca68d011d91", "measure_id": "199800438", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require majority voter approval for any major public project conferring \u201csignificant private benefit,\u201d as defined  in the proposition?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 180443, "no_votes": 93429, "total_votes": 273872, "percent_yes": 65.88588829818309, "percent_no": 34.11411170181691, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.479470", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.874351", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.161772", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require majority voter approval for any major public project conferring \u201csignificant private benefit,\u201d as defined  in the proposition?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10732, "fingerprint": "1998|199800114|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800114|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "234166964ed0b72a", "measure_id": "199800114", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Carlsbad's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 9661, "no_votes": 6554, "total_votes": 16215, "percent_yes": 59.58063521430774, "percent_no": 40.41936478569226, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.866068", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.157045", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Carlsbad's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12252, "fingerprint": "1998|199800439|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800439|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b2681929cca2a99c", "measure_id": "199800439", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to permit the award of public works contracts to the same entity which furnishes both design and construction services for the same project and which must be competitively negotiated?  Amendment requires the City Council to enact an ordinance to set guidelines for the use, evaluation, and award of such contracts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 180329, "no_votes": 83952, "total_votes": 264281, "percent_yes": 68.23381173826344, "percent_no": 31.76618826173656, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.479940", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.874831", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.161954", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to permit the award of public works contracts to the same entity which furnishes both design and construction services for the same project and which must be competitively negotiated?  Amendment requires the City Council to enact an ordinance to set guidelines for the use, evaluation, and award of such contracts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10733, "fingerprint": "1998|199800115|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800115|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "eb068db0a73f190b", "measure_id": "199800115", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Del Mar's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 896, "no_votes": 316, "total_votes": 1212, "percent_yes": 73.92739273927393, "percent_no": 26.072607260726073, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.866338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.157223", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Del Mar's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12253, "fingerprint": "1998|199800440|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800440|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "1b7d237e860735de", "measure_id": "199800440", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to permit public works contracts to be competitively negotiated?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 203100, "no_votes": 60521, "total_votes": 263621, "percent_yes": 77.04242074796772, "percent_no": 22.957579252032275, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.480354", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.875332", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.162135", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to permit public works contracts to be competitively negotiated?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10734, "fingerprint": "1998|199800116|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800116|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7760a45c96903ccf", "measure_id": "199800116", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Encinitas' costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5921, "no_votes": 5228, "total_votes": 11149, "percent_yes": 53.10790205399587, "percent_no": 46.89209794600413, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.866609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.157404", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Encinitas' costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12254, "fingerprint": "1998|199800441|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800441|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b2fc7f0a46985e4a", "measure_id": "199800441", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require surety bonds for public works contracts to assure that they exceed $100,000 instead of for public works contracts that exceed $25,000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 168310, "no_votes": 92716, "total_votes": 261026, "percent_yes": 64.48016672668622, "percent_no": 35.51983327331378, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.480889", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.875776", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.162313", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Charter be amended to require surety bonds for public works contracts to assure that they exceed $100,000 instead of for public works contracts that exceed $25,000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10735, "fingerprint": "1998|199800117|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800117|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "b7ace75e2ee72289", "measure_id": "199800117", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Imperial Beach's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1636, "no_votes": 1242, "total_votes": 2878, "percent_yes": 56.84503127171647, "percent_no": 43.15496872828353, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.866877", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.157593", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Imperial Beach's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12255, "fingerprint": "1998|199800442|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800442|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "5df65cb647c2d4ca", "measure_id": "199800442", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Sand Diego City Charter be amended by adding Section 94.3, allowing the City Council to establish a bond reimbursement program, to reimburse contractors for all or a portion of the premium paid for a surety bond required by the Charter for City contracts?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 138009, "no_votes": 116889, "total_votes": 254898, "percent_yes": 54.142833604029846, "percent_no": 45.857166395970154, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.481448", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.876212", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.162490", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sand Diego City Charter be amended by adding Section 94.3, allowing the City Council to establish a bond reimbursement program, to reimburse contractors for all or a portion of the premium paid for a surety bond required by the Charter for City contracts?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10736, "fingerprint": "1998|199800118|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800118|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "02141c01c6190410", "measure_id": "199800118", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Poway's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6794, "no_votes": 3118, "total_votes": 9912, "percent_yes": 68.54317998385795, "percent_no": 31.456820016142046, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.867238", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.157773", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Poway's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10759, "fingerprint": "1998|199800547|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800547|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e84b18820909e057", "measure_id": "199800547", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To repair leaky roofs, repair unsafe classrooms, install fire safety improvements, replace outdated plumbing, heating, air-conditioning, and electrical systems, provide handicapped access, and construct and acquire new classrooms and facilities to relieve overcrowding, shall the Chula Vista Elementary School District issue $95 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as an independent citizens committee oversees the use of such funds with no funds being used for employee salary increases?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 29641, "no_votes": 9578, "total_votes": 39219, "percent_yes": 75.57816364517198, "percent_no": 24.421836354828017, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.881450", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.164521", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To repair leaky roofs, repair unsafe classrooms, install fire safety improvements, replace outdated plumbing, heating, air-conditioning, and electrical systems, provide handicapped access, and construct and acquire new classrooms and facilities to relieve overcrowding, shall the Chula Vista Elementary School District issue $95 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit so long as an independent citizens committee oversees the use of such funds with no funds being used for employee salary increases?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12256, "fingerprint": "1998|199800443|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800443|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "cdb763890e3cea93", "measure_id": "199800443", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the General Plan of the City of San Diego be amended to change the designation of 1,410 acres in Subarea I from \u201cFuture Urbanizing\u201d to \u201cPlanned Urbanizing\u201d to create a transit-oriented community, provided that 280 additional acres of habitat is permanently conserved for a total of 1,945 acres of habitat is permanently conserved for a total of 1,945 acres of open space in the Subarea, and substantial contributions are made by the developer for needed schools, fire stations, roadway improvements to Interstate 15, SR-56 and other regional roadways?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 148987, "no_votes": 138712, "total_votes": 287699, "percent_yes": 51.785720492598166, "percent_no": 48.214279507401834, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.481807", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.876755", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.162669", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the General Plan of the City of San Diego be amended to change the designation of 1,410 acres in Subarea I from \u201cFuture Urbanizing\u201d to \u201cPlanned Urbanizing\u201d to create a transit-oriented community, provided that 280 additional acres of habitat is permanently conserved for a total of 1,945 acres of habitat is permanently conserved for a total of 1,945 acres of open space in the Subarea, and substantial contributions are made by the developer for needed schools, fire stations, roadway improvements to Interstate 15, SR-56 and other regional roadways?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10739, "fingerprint": "1998|199800121|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800121|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "ca05b11dbe59c30b", "measure_id": "199800121", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying San Marcos' costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4599, "no_votes": 3242, "total_votes": 7841, "percent_yes": 58.65323300599413, "percent_no": 41.34676699400587, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.868046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.158319", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying San Marcos' costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10760, "fingerprint": "1998|199800548|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800548|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "66894bdd4b22e566", "measure_id": "199800548", "measure_letter": "KK", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new middle school, to repair and renovate Silver Strand Elementary School and science, technology, and other classrooms at Coronado High School, including replacing deteriorating electrical, heating and plumbing systems, shall the Coronado Unified School District issue general obligation bonds in the maximum principal amount of $17,000,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit with all money raised staying in Coronado?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4938, "no_votes": 1528, "total_votes": 6466, "percent_yes": 76.3686978038973, "percent_no": 23.631302196102695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.881894", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.164705", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new middle school, to repair and renovate Silver Strand Elementary School and science, technology, and other classrooms at Coronado High School, including replacing deteriorating electrical, heating and plumbing systems, shall the Coronado Unified School District issue general obligation bonds in the maximum principal amount of $17,000,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit with all money raised staying in Coronado?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10740, "fingerprint": "1998|199800122|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800122|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "aa7aae0277000378", "measure_id": "199800122", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Solana Beach's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2262, "no_votes": 1008, "total_votes": 3270, "percent_yes": 69.1743119266055, "percent_no": 30.825688073394502, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.868311", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.158498", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance for funding police, fire, medical and other emergency services be approved which establishes as a special tax the previously authorized charge to continue paying Solana Beach's costs of participating in the Regional Communications System?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10761, "fingerprint": "1998|199800549|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800549|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6306cd97d8fdb43b", "measure_id": "199800549", "measure_letter": "LL", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide students with access to classroom computer technology, reduce student safety hazards, replace and repair old deteriorating sewers, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems, upgrade libraries, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Lemon Grove School District issue $12 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit to acquire, construct, and improve schools throughout the district?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5657, "no_votes": 1280, "total_votes": 6937, "percent_yes": 81.54821969150929, "percent_no": 18.45178030849071, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.882327", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.164883", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide students with access to classroom computer technology, reduce student safety hazards, replace and repair old deteriorating sewers, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems, upgrade libraries, and make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Lemon Grove School District issue $12 million of bonds at an interest rate below the legal limit to acquire, construct, and improve schools throughout the district?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12257, "fingerprint": "1998|199800444|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800444|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "bd5d7d07fe1a7e28", "measure_id": "199800444", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Diego\u2019s General Plan be amended to change the designation of 2,202 acres in Subarea III from \u201cFuture Urbanizing\u201d to \u201cPlanned Urbanizing\u201d to allow development of a transit-oriented community, provided that 889 acres remains open space, and an additional 150 acres of extremely rare habitat on Carmel Mountain is dedicated to the City, and approximately 90 acres within Subarea III needed for completion of SR-56 is sold to the City at substantially below market value?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 154255, "no_votes": 134991, "total_votes": 289246, "percent_yes": 53.3300374076046, "percent_no": 46.6699625923954, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.482083", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.877250", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.162862", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Diego\u2019s General Plan be amended to change the designation of 2,202 acres in Subarea III from \u201cFuture Urbanizing\u201d to \u201cPlanned Urbanizing\u201d to allow development of a transit-oriented community, provided that 889 acres remains open space, and an additional 150 acres of extremely rare habitat on Carmel Mountain is dedicated to the City, and approximately 90 acres within Subarea III needed for completion of SR-56 is sold to the City at substantially below market value?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10741, "fingerprint": "1998|199800170|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800170|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "be2303a31125a247", "measure_id": "199800170", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance be approved establishing a special tax to pay Vista\u2019s costs of participating in the Regional Communications System for police, fire and public safety services?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6122, "no_votes": 5368, "total_votes": 11490, "percent_yes": 53.2811140121845, "percent_no": 46.7188859878155, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.869217", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.159049", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance be approved establishing a special tax to pay Vista\u2019s costs of participating in the Regional Communications System for police, fire and public safety services?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10762, "fingerprint": "1998|199800550|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800550|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "7629ae28bc1f99c1", "measure_id": "199800550", "measure_letter": "MM", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve classroom health, safety and instruction in every neighborhood school by repairing roofs, drainage, heating, plumbing and electrical systems; upgrading fire security, disabled access, science laboratories, wiring for computers; removing hazardous lead paints; building needed libraries; enabling additional class size reduction; and building and acquiring schools and classrooms; shall the San Diego Unified School District issue $1.510 billion in bonds at legal interest rates, pay no salaries for general administration, conduct annual audits and establish Independent Oversight Committee?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 200750, "no_votes": 55027, "total_votes": 255777, "percent_yes": 78.48633770823804, "percent_no": 21.51366229176196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.882799", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.165065", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve classroom health, safety and instruction in every neighborhood school by repairing roofs, drainage, heating, plumbing and electrical systems; upgrading fire security, disabled access, science laboratories, wiring for computers; removing hazardous lead paints; building needed libraries; enabling additional class size reduction; and building and acquiring schools and classrooms; shall the San Diego Unified School District issue $1.510 billion in bonds at legal interest rates, pay no salaries for general administration, conduct annual audits and establish Independent Oversight Committee?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12258, "fingerprint": "1998|199800445|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800445|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "f8cf19a7ad6ffc41", "measure_id": "199800445", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 0-18569 be ratified?  This ordinance authorizes the transfer of approximately 30 acres of City-owned land in exchange for 473.7 acres of land within the planning area for the San Dieguito River Park.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 186098, "no_votes": 76938, "total_votes": 263036, "percent_yes": 70.75001140528293, "percent_no": 29.249988594717067, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.482290", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.877742", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.163049", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 0-18569 be ratified?  This ordinance authorizes the transfer of approximately 30 acres of City-owned land in exchange for 473.7 acres of land within the planning area for the San Dieguito River Park.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10743, "fingerprint": "1998|199800220|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800220|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e5a36efebdf71215", "measure_id": "199800220", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Mountain Empire Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $3.2 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law to be used for the upgrading and requiring of classrooms for computers and other modern technology, the construction and acquisition of new classrooms and facilities, and the repair and upgrade of existing schools and classrooms throughout the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1551, "no_votes": 656, "total_votes": 2207, "percent_yes": 70.27639329406435, "percent_no": 29.72360670593565, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.869802", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.159414", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Mountain Empire Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $3.2 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law to be used for the upgrading and requiring of classrooms for computers and other modern technology, the construction and acquisition of new classrooms and facilities, and the repair and upgrade of existing schools and classrooms throughout the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10763, "fingerprint": "1998|199800551|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800551|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e80f36f77551a245", "measure_id": "199800551", "measure_letter": "NN", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Should the San Pasqual Union School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount of $1,712,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum, for the purpose of construction and renovation of school facilities needed to meet the projected doubling of students enrollment over the next five years and to allow the district to maximize potential contributing funding from state school bonds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 533, "no_votes": 175, "total_votes": 708, "percent_yes": 75.28248587570621, "percent_no": 24.717514124293785, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.883283", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.165246", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the San Pasqual Union School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount of $1,712,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the statutory maximum, for the purpose of construction and renovation of school facilities needed to meet the projected doubling of students enrollment over the next five years and to allow the district to maximize potential contributing funding from state school bonds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10745, "fingerprint": "1998|199800429|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800429|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "964d2972a47bda42", "measure_id": "199800429", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Are you in favor of the City of Coronado seeking funding sources to construct a bored tunnel between the Coronado Bridge and the Naval Air Station?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6064, "no_votes": 1249, "total_votes": 7313, "percent_yes": 82.92082592643239, "percent_no": 17.079174073567614, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.870883", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.160143", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Are you in favor of the City of Coronado seeking funding sources to construct a bored tunnel between the Coronado Bridge and the Naval Air Station?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10746, "fingerprint": "1998|199800430|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800430|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "fa178d1135591f5e", "measure_id": "199800430", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To help protect the lives and property of all Del Mar residents from wildland fires and firestorms, shall the City of Del Mar, California incur a bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 at interest rates not to exceed the legally authorized maximum rate per year for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, and financing water system upgrades necessary to provide enhanced water flows for firefighting at the City?s urban/wildland boundaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1504, "no_votes": 584, "total_votes": 2088, "percent_yes": 72.03065134099617, "percent_no": 27.969348659003828, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.871173", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.160322", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To help protect the lives and property of all Del Mar residents from wildland fires and firestorms, shall the City of Del Mar, California incur a bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 at interest rates not to exceed the legally authorized maximum rate per year for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, and financing water system upgrades necessary to provide enhanced water flows for firefighting at the City?s urban/wildland boundaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10747, "fingerprint": "1998|199800431|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800431|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "708b8f48bb7387b7", "measure_id": "199800431", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an amendment to subsection A of section 3.12.010, to create a revenue source for beach sand replenishment and stabilization projects, requiring that commencing on January 1, 1999, in addition to the existing 8% occupancy tax, each hotel guest shall pay a tax of 2% of the rent charged by the hotel operator which shall be used only for beach sand replenishment and stabilization projects, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12963, "no_votes": 5908, "total_votes": 18871, "percent_yes": 68.69270308939642, "percent_no": 31.307296910603583, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.871474", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.160501", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an amendment to subsection A of section 3.12.010, to create a revenue source for beach sand replenishment and stabilization projects, requiring that commencing on January 1, 1999, in addition to the existing 8% occupancy tax, each hotel guest shall pay a tax of 2% of the rent charged by the hotel operator which shall be used only for beach sand replenishment and stabilization projects, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10748, "fingerprint": "1998|199800432|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800432|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "6ea87f5a5683394c", "measure_id": "199800432", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the City of Escondido approve the following:  An initiative measure to require voter approval of specified future changes to the Escondido General Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15463, "no_votes": 10430, "total_votes": 25893, "percent_yes": 59.71884293052177, "percent_no": 40.28115706947823, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.871775", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.160680", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the City of Escondido approve the following:  An initiative measure to require voter approval of specified future changes to the Escondido General Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10749, "fingerprint": "1998|199800433|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800433|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "64e6ed0026fab63f", "measure_id": "199800433", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the City of Escondido approve the following:  An ordinance limiting the amount by which space rents for a mobilehome may be increased after the mobilehome is transferred or sold by the existing tenant.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12647, "no_votes": 13064, "total_votes": 25711, "percent_yes": 49.18906304694488, "percent_no": 50.81093695305512, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.872089", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.160863", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the City of Escondido approve the following:  An ordinance limiting the amount by which space rents for a mobilehome may be increased after the mobilehome is transferred or sold by the existing tenant.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10750, "fingerprint": "1998|199800434|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800434|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "478d185b83a627e5", "measure_id": "199800434", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the people of the City of Escondido approve the following:  \u201cShall Section B of Proposition N be repealed and the office of City Clerk be appointive?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12298, "no_votes": 11048, "total_votes": 23346, "percent_yes": 52.67711813586909, "percent_no": 47.32288186413091, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.872364", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.161041", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of the City of Escondido approve the following:  \u201cShall Section B of Proposition N be repealed and the office of City Clerk be appointive?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10751, "fingerprint": "1998|199800435|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800435|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "e78d90ac01d666f3", "measure_id": "199800435", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the property lying east of the beach and Strand right-of-way and west of Pacific Street from Seagaze Drive to Civic Center Drive, be leased as an acceptable use of City parkland for a development and redevelopment of facilities and recreation uses related to a resort hotel, and which shall include public parking and a new beachfront amphitheater/pavilion entertainment and events facility?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 20772, "no_votes": 16672, "total_votes": 37444, "percent_yes": 55.474842431364166, "percent_no": 44.525157568635834, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.872679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.161223", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the property lying east of the beach and Strand right-of-way and west of Pacific Street from Seagaze Drive to Civic Center Drive, be leased as an acceptable use of City parkland for a development and redevelopment of facilities and recreation uses related to a resort hotel, and which shall include public parking and a new beachfront amphitheater/pavilion entertainment and events facility?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10752, "fingerprint": "1998|199800446|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800446|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "81b94aef562da9ad", "measure_id": "199800446", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall  an ordinance be adopted amending the Municipal Code of the City of San Marcos to add a new Section 2.08.020(f), to read as follows:  No person shall be subject to a limitation on the number of terms that may be served in any elected municipal office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3722, "no_votes": 7333, "total_votes": 11055, "percent_yes": 33.66802351876978, "percent_no": 66.33197648123021, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.878181", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.163232", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall  an ordinance be adopted amending the Municipal Code of the City of San Marcos to add a new Section 2.08.020(f), to read as follows:  No person shall be subject to a limitation on the number of terms that may be served in any elected municipal office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10753, "fingerprint": "1998|199800447|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800447|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "442ac82000004e87", "measure_id": "199800447", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the Municipal code of the City of San Marcos to add a new section 2.08.020(f) to read as follows:  No person shall serve more than three (3) consecutive terms in the same elected municipal office.  Provision shall apply to elections held in November 2000 and thereafter.  Any person holding, or who has held, elected office prior to the November 2000 election shall not have prior or current terms counted for the purpose of applying any term limit provision to the November 2000?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6349, "no_votes": 4627, "total_votes": 10976, "percent_yes": 57.84438775510205, "percent_no": 42.15561224489795, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.878624", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.163410", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the Municipal code of the City of San Marcos to add a new section 2.08.020(f) to read as follows:  No person shall serve more than three (3) consecutive terms in the same elected municipal office.  Provision shall apply to elections held in November 2000 and thereafter.  Any person holding, or who has held, elected office prior to the November 2000 election shall not have prior or current terms counted for the purpose of applying any term limit provision to the November 2000?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10754, "fingerprint": "1998|199800448|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800448|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "47be836f13ad371f", "measure_id": "199800448", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the Municipal code of the City of San Marcos to add a new section 2.08.020(f) to read as follows:  No elected official of the City of San Marcos, elected by the voters of the City of San Marcos under the provisions of the Charter of the City of San Marcos, shall serve consecutive terms in the same office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2680, "no_votes": 8239, "total_votes": 10919, "percent_yes": 24.54437219525597, "percent_no": 75.45562780474403, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.879065", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.163596", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the Municipal code of the City of San Marcos to add a new section 2.08.020(f) to read as follows:  No elected official of the City of San Marcos, elected by the voters of the City of San Marcos under the provisions of the Charter of the City of San Marcos, shall serve consecutive terms in the same office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10755, "fingerprint": "1998|199800449|SAN DIEGO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800449|SAN DIEGO", "content_hash": "43b9ea4386c739be", "measure_id": "199800449", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Diego", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to replace Section 2.08.030 of the Municipal Code of the City of San Marcos and its accompanying Editor\u2019s Note to provide that each member of the City Council, including the Mayor, shall receive a salary in the sum of $977.00 per month, exclusive of any reimbursements or amounts received in their respective capacities as members of governmental agencies or commissions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3737, "no_votes": 7046, "total_votes": 10783, "percent_yes": 34.65640359825651, "percent_no": 65.3435964017435, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.879540", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.163780", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to replace Section 2.08.030 of the Municipal Code of the City of San Marcos and its accompanying Editor\u2019s Note to provide that each member of the City Council, including the Mayor, shall receive a salary in the sum of $977.00 per month, exclusive of any reimbursements or amounts received in their respective capacities as members of governmental agencies or commissions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Diego_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Diego County Elections", "url": "https://www.sdvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12259, "fingerprint": "1998|199800275|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800275|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "c48eff023d92eec0", "measure_id": "199800275", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City increase pension benefits for police officers hired after 1976?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 125426, "no_votes": 93002, "total_votes": 218428, "percent_yes": 57.422125368542495, "percent_no": 42.577874631457505, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.488292", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.888047", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.167632", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City increase pension benefits for police officers hired after 1976?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10764, "fingerprint": "1998|199800123|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800123|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "28a88b59c7c83e4a", "measure_id": "199800123", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City and County incur $89.9 million of bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and/or reconstruction of a new M.H. de Young Memorial Museum in Golden Gate Park and all other works, property and structures necessary or convenient for improvements to Golden Gate Park in the areas appurtenant to, or which provide access to, the de Young Museum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 118013, "no_votes": 65383, "total_votes": 183396, "percent_yes": 64.34873170625313, "percent_no": 35.65126829374687, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.883713", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.165429", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City and County incur $89.9 million of bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and/or reconstruction of a new M.H. de Young Memorial Museum in Golden Gate Park and all other works, property and structures necessary or convenient for improvements to Golden Gate Park in the areas appurtenant to, or which provide access to, the de Young Museum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12260, "fingerprint": "1998|199800276|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800276|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "17d86aa4562b930e", "measure_id": "199800276", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall City Departments be required to prepare an annual Customer Service Plan?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 118102, "no_votes": 91794, "total_votes": 209896, "percent_yes": 56.266913137934985, "percent_no": 43.733086862065015, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.488597", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.888398", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.168034", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Departments be required to prepare an annual Customer Service Plan?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10765, "fingerprint": "1998|199800124|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800124|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "d8199f8491d75e1a", "measure_id": "199800124", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the salary of members of the Board of Supervisors be increased from $23,924, to $37,585?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 105382, "no_votes": 75595, "total_votes": 180977, "percent_yes": 58.22949877608757, "percent_no": 41.77050122391243, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.884199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.165610", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the salary of members of the Board of Supervisors be increased from $23,924, to $37,585?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12261, "fingerprint": "1998|199800277|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800277|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "909bcd32768798fe", "measure_id": "199800277", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City count the time that paramedics worked for the Department of Public Health towards their Fire Department pensions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 132437, "no_votes": 80500, "total_votes": 212937, "percent_yes": 62.19539112507455, "percent_no": 37.80460887492545, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.488954", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.888686", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.168431", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City count the time that paramedics worked for the Department of Public Health towards their Fire Department pensions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10766, "fingerprint": "1998|199800125|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800125|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6aabbeeed586a0ca", "measure_id": "199800125", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City change the priorities for spending water utility income, move the priorities for spending other income from the Charter to the Administrative Code, and create a separate fund for water utility income?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 64333, "no_votes": 89691, "total_votes": 154024, "percent_yes": 41.76816600010388, "percent_no": 58.23183399989612, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.884632", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.165794", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City change the priorities for spending water utility income, move the priorities for spending other income from the Charter to the Administrative Code, and create a separate fund for water utility income?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12262, "fingerprint": "1998|199800278|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800278|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2102b139bcd0ed91", "measure_id": "199800278", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City create a Taxi Commission to regulate taxicabs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 143447, "no_votes": 70183, "total_votes": 213630, "percent_yes": 67.14740439076908, "percent_no": 32.85259560923092, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.489301", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.889046", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.168659", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City create a Taxi Commission to regulate taxicabs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10767, "fingerprint": "1998|199800126|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800126|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "5aad2f0e416ee8a6", "measure_id": "199800126", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City be authorized to borrow money from the Federal and State governments to pay for certain environmental improvement projects?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107461, "no_votes": 60301, "total_votes": 167762, "percent_yes": 64.05562642314709, "percent_no": 35.94437357685291, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.885032", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.165973", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City be authorized to borrow money from the Federal and State governments to pay for certain environmental improvement projects?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12263, "fingerprint": "1998|199800279|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800279|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "75b8058d3d20ccae", "measure_id": "199800279", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City repeal 1997\u2019s Proposition H and authorize Caltrans to replace the Central Freeway with an elevated structure to Market Street and a ground-level boulevard from Market along Octavia Street?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 115593, "no_votes": 103013, "total_votes": 218606, "percent_yes": 52.87732267183883, "percent_no": 47.12267732816117, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.489648", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.889382", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.168888", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City repeal 1997\u2019s Proposition H and authorize Caltrans to replace the Central Freeway with an elevated structure to Market Street and a ground-level boulevard from Market along Octavia Street?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10768, "fingerprint": "1998|199800127|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800127|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "6c03af23a17b905d", "measure_id": "199800127", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall residential property that is occupied by the owner and that contains four or fewer rental units be exempt from the City\u2019s rent and eviction control law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 70885, "no_votes": 110920, "total_votes": 181805, "percent_yes": 38.98957674431396, "percent_no": 61.01042325568604, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.885363", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.166154", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall residential property that is occupied by the owner and that contains four or fewer rental units be exempt from the City\u2019s rent and eviction control law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12264, "fingerprint": "1998|199800280|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800280|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "a22e091974662007", "measure_id": "199800280", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City continue to collect the stadium admission tax and make the supplemental admission tax permanent?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 150491, "no_votes": 57588, "total_votes": 208079, "percent_yes": 72.32397310636826, "percent_no": 27.676026893631743, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.490004", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.889716", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.169129", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City continue to collect the stadium admission tax and make the supplemental admission tax permanent?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10769, "fingerprint": "1998|199800128|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800128|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "3097ed9309b6d63a", "measure_id": "199800128", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall all of the City departments that were located in City Hall prior to the 1989 earthquake occupy the same amount of space in City Hall when the renovation is  completed, and shall use of public funds for the City\u2019s Office of Protocol be prohibited?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 102765, "no_votes": 70337, "total_votes": 173102, "percent_yes": 59.3667317535326, "percent_no": 40.6332682464674, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.885667", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.166336", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall all of the City departments that were located in City Hall prior to the 1989 earthquake occupy the same amount of space in City Hall when the renovation is  completed, and shall use of public funds for the City\u2019s Office of Protocol be prohibited?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12265, "fingerprint": "1998|199800281|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800281|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "015d6584cb051637", "measure_id": "199800281", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City impose new restrictions on owner move-in evictions and make permanent the existing moratorium on owner move-in evictions of long-term senior, disabled, or catastrophically ill tenants?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 121249, "no_votes": 97850, "total_votes": 219099, "percent_yes": 55.33982355008467, "percent_no": 44.66017644991533, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.490408", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.890007", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.169357", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City impose new restrictions on owner move-in evictions and make permanent the existing moratorium on owner move-in evictions of long-term senior, disabled, or catastrophically ill tenants?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10770, "fingerprint": "1998|199800129|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800129|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "ca7bde685fa04839", "measure_id": "199800129", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the number of paid staff positions for each member of the Board of Supervisors be reduced from three to two, shall the Board\u2019s four legislative analyst positions be eliminated and shall any future increase in staffing be prohibited?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 78969, "no_votes": 90710, "total_votes": 169679, "percent_yes": 46.54023184955121, "percent_no": 53.45976815044879, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.885998", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.166523", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the number of paid staff positions for each member of the Board of Supervisors be reduced from three to two, shall the Board\u2019s four legislative analyst positions be eliminated and shall any future increase in staffing be prohibited?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12266, "fingerprint": "1998|199800282|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800282|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "bf5c45b25eea3f22", "measure_id": "199800282", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City continue to collect the 2% hotel tax surcharge?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 180129, "no_votes": 35233, "total_votes": 215362, "percent_yes": 83.64010363945357, "percent_no": 16.35989636054643, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.490775", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.890303", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.169585", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City continue to collect the 2% hotel tax surcharge?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10771, "fingerprint": "1998|199800130|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800130|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "afb6cc6a6983d28e", "measure_id": "199800130", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City\u2019s water and sewer rates be frozen at their current levels until July 1, 2006, subject to certain exceptions?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 100781, "no_votes": 70569, "total_votes": 171350, "percent_yes": 58.81587394222352, "percent_no": 41.18412605777648, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.886357", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.166708", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City\u2019s water and sewer rates be frozen at their current levels until July 1, 2006, subject to certain exceptions?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12267, "fingerprint": "1998|199800283|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800283|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "36ffb084e9384036", "measure_id": "199800283", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to ask the State to include passenger rail service in the redesign of the Bay Bridge?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 131250, "no_votes": 83590, "total_votes": 214840, "percent_yes": 61.09197542357103, "percent_no": 38.90802457642897, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.491128", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.890586", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.169817", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to ask the State to include passenger rail service in the redesign of the Bay Bridge?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10772, "fingerprint": "1998|199800131|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800131|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "0f91401e3c8dda95", "measure_id": "199800131", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City be required to notify the public before locating certain City facilities or services anywhere in San Francisco?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 106367, "no_votes": 63758, "total_votes": 170125, "percent_yes": 62.52285084496694, "percent_no": 37.47714915503306, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.886751", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.166916", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City be required to notify the public before locating certain City facilities or services anywhere in San Francisco?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12268, "fingerprint": "1998|199800284|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800284|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "2f55dc1b5fce85d3", "measure_id": "199800284", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to create a voluntary health care purchasing program to help make affordable health care coverage available to uninsured City residents?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 140277, "no_votes": 76537, "total_votes": 216814, "percent_yes": 64.6992352892341, "percent_no": 35.300764710765904, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.491486", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.890957", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.170044", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to create a voluntary health care purchasing program to help make affordable health care coverage available to uninsured City residents?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10773, "fingerprint": "1998|199800132|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800132|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "921b5d98b7a6b644", "measure_id": "199800132", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the City authorize construction of an underground public parking garage and related landscaping and transit improvements in the Music Concourse area of Golden Gate Park, to be built with private donations?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 104069, "no_votes": 74985, "total_votes": 179054, "percent_yes": 58.12157226311615, "percent_no": 41.87842773688385, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.887161", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.167097", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City authorize construction of an underground public parking garage and related landscaping and transit improvements in the Music Concourse area of Golden Gate Park, to be built with private donations?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10774, "fingerprint": "1998|199800133|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800133|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "4d5bf14fde4ddadd", "measure_id": "199800133", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to urge the repeal of State and City laws authorizing the Treasure Island Development Authority to oversee the conversion of Treasure Island to civilian use, and to impose certain restrictions on the development and leasing of Treasure Island?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 93501, "no_votes": 74849, "total_votes": 168350, "percent_yes": 55.53964953964954, "percent_no": 44.46035046035046, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.887458", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.167276", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to urge the repeal of State and City laws authorizing the Treasure Island Development Authority to oversee the conversion of Treasure Island to civilian use, and to impose certain restrictions on the development and leasing of Treasure Island?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10775, "fingerprint": "1998|199800134|SAN FRANCISCO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800134|SAN FRANCISCO", "content_hash": "8c6c002547cef655", "measure_id": "199800134", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Francisco", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall it be City policy to encourage the National Park Service and Presidio Trust to restore open space and preserve the existing housing units at the Presidio, and make most of the existing housing units available as rental housing?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 93002, "no_votes": 81988, "total_votes": 174990, "percent_yes": 53.14703697354135, "percent_no": 46.85296302645865, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Policy/Position", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.887751", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.167454", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall it be City policy to encourage the National Park Service and Presidio Trust to restore open space and preserve the existing housing units at the Presidio, and make most of the existing housing units available as rental housing?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Francisco County Elections", "url": "https://sfelections.sfgov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10776, "fingerprint": "1998|199800135|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800135|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "f8110ee001837610", "measure_id": "199800135", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall members of the Board of Supervisors and Board of Education be limited to two (2) terms of office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 59016, "no_votes": 24412, "total_votes": 83428, "percent_yes": 70.73884067699093, "percent_no": 29.261159323009068, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.891244", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.170268", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall members of the Board of Supervisors and Board of Education be limited to two (2) terms of office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10777, "fingerprint": "1998|199800221|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800221|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c0ebb01c7536b49f", "measure_id": "199800221", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, repair, and upgrade its schools and maintain reduced class sizes, shall the Linden Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of $11,825,000, at an interest rate not exceeding the legal limit, to provide funds to improve or replace classrooms for safety, repair roofs and replace heating/ventilation systems throughout the District, provide computer technology access to classrooms, and acquire, construct, renovate and repair classrooms and facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1842, "no_votes": 1044, "total_votes": 2886, "percent_yes": 63.82536382536382, "percent_no": 36.17463617463618, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.891586", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.170500", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, repair, and upgrade its schools and maintain reduced class sizes, shall the Linden Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of $11,825,000, at an interest rate not exceeding the legal limit, to provide funds to improve or replace classrooms for safety, repair roofs and replace heating/ventilation systems throughout the District, provide computer technology access to classrooms, and acquire, construct, renovate and repair classrooms and facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10778, "fingerprint": "1998|199800453|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800453|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "9053222098dd85f0", "measure_id": "199800453", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the term of office of Mayor of the City of Lathrop be changed from two years to four years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 629, "no_votes": 939, "total_votes": 1568, "percent_yes": 40.11479591836735, "percent_no": 59.88520408163265, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.891884", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.170734", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the term of office of Mayor of the City of Lathrop be changed from two years to four years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10779, "fingerprint": "1998|199800454|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800454|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c87d5e2fdfc9f765", "measure_id": "199800454", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Stockton Ordinance No. 011-98 C.S. be approved to authorize the City of Stockton to receive 50% of the Real Property Transfer Tax currently imposed by the County of San Joaquin on the conveyance of real property located within the City?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 23210, "no_votes": 13628, "total_votes": 36838, "percent_yes": 63.00559205168575, "percent_no": 36.99440794831425, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.892170", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.170960", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Stockton Ordinance No. 011-98 C.S. be approved to authorize the City of Stockton to receive 50% of the Real Property Transfer Tax currently imposed by the County of San Joaquin on the conveyance of real property located within the City?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10780, "fingerprint": "1998|199800552|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800552|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "c0ebb01c7536b49f", "measure_id": "199800552", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To renovate, repair, and upgrade its schools and maintain reduced class sizes, shall the Linden Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of $11,825,000, at an interest rate not exceeding the legal limit, to provide funds to improve or replace classrooms for safety, repair roofs and replace heating/ventilation systems throughout the District, provide computer technology access to classrooms, and acquire, construct, renovate and repair classrooms and facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2102, "no_votes": 1225, "total_votes": 3327, "percent_yes": 63.1800420799519, "percent_no": 36.8199579200481, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.892507", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.171189", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To renovate, repair, and upgrade its schools and maintain reduced class sizes, shall the Linden Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness of $11,825,000, at an interest rate not exceeding the legal limit, to provide funds to improve or replace classrooms for safety, repair roofs and replace heating/ventilation systems throughout the District, provide computer technology access to classrooms, and acquire, construct, renovate and repair classrooms and facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10781, "fingerprint": "1998|199800553|SAN JOAQUIN|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800553|SAN JOAQUIN", "content_hash": "b1075796c8a946f6", "measure_id": "199800553", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Joaquin", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide students with a greater opportunity to attend neighborhood schools on a traditional or modified traditional calendar, construct new schools and necessary additions to existing schools. rehabilitate existing classrooms, reduce classroom overcrowding, improve classroom security, and ive students greater access to classroom computer technology, shall the Lodi Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $122 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17429, "no_votes": 11162, "total_votes": 28591, "percent_yes": 60.95974257633521, "percent_no": 39.04025742366479, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.892829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.171400", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide students with a greater opportunity to attend neighborhood schools on a traditional or modified traditional calendar, construct new schools and necessary additions to existing schools. rehabilitate existing classrooms, reduce classroom overcrowding, improve classroom security, and ive students greater access to classroom computer technology, shall the Lodi Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $122 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Joaquin_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Joaquin County Elections", "url": "https://www.sjcrov.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10782, "fingerprint": "1998|199800057|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800057|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "ea1f06a2952bc2e5", "measure_id": "199800057", "measure_letter": "A-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve classroom overcrowding and enhance student health and safety by purchasing land and constructing a new elementary school, construct a multi-purpose/cafeteria, music room at Santa Lucia Middle School and make necessary related site improvements, shall the Coast Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $14,400,000 at an interest rate not to exceed the maximum permitted by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1705, "no_votes": 1093, "total_votes": 2798, "percent_yes": 60.93638313080773, "percent_no": 39.06361686919227, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.893120", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.171587", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve classroom overcrowding and enhance student health and safety by purchasing land and constructing a new elementary school, construct a multi-purpose/cafeteria, music room at Santa Lucia Middle School and make necessary related site improvements, shall the Coast Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $14,400,000 at an interest rate not to exceed the maximum permitted by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10783, "fingerprint": "1998|199800058|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800058|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "cff52000da8d0874", "measure_id": "199800058", "measure_letter": "B-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace deteriorating temporary portable classrooms by constructing twelve new permanent classrooms at Coast Union High School, which would include two modern science labs, two computer/technology labs to meet academic standards, a photography lab, a music room; and realign the current athletic facilities to allow for the new classrooms, shall the Coast Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $3,600,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2598, "no_votes": 1086, "total_votes": 3684, "percent_yes": 70.52117263843648, "percent_no": 29.478827361563518, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.893452", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.171768", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace deteriorating temporary portable classrooms by constructing twelve new permanent classrooms at Coast Union High School, which would include two modern science labs, two computer/technology labs to meet academic standards, a photography lab, a music room; and realign the current athletic facilities to allow for the new classrooms, shall the Coast Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $3,600,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10785, "fingerprint": "1998|199800222|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800222|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "93b1368e42bcbc8d", "measure_id": "199800222", "measure_letter": "C-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding by building new schools; to implement class size reduction by adding classrooms; to replace old plumbing, sewers, lighting, heating, electrical systems, and old and worn roofs in existing buildings; and to renovate older buildings; shall Paso Robles Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds of School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Paso Robles Union Elementary School District Area) in the principal amount of $65,000,000, bearing interest at rates within the legal limits, for the acquisition and improvement of real property for elementary and high school purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4941, "no_votes": 3405, "total_votes": 8346, "percent_yes": 59.2020129403307, "percent_no": 40.7979870596693, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.894070", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.172129", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding by building new schools; to implement class size reduction by adding classrooms; to replace old plumbing, sewers, lighting, heating, electrical systems, and old and worn roofs in existing buildings; and to renovate older buildings; shall Paso Robles Joint Unified School District be authorized to issue bonds of School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (Paso Robles Union Elementary School District Area) in the principal amount of $65,000,000, bearing interest at rates within the legal limits, for the acquisition and improvement of real property for elementary and high school purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10784, "fingerprint": "1998|199800171|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800171|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "64ab01f16ef56eb2", "measure_id": "199800171", "measure_letter": "D-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of El Paso de Robles be authorized to issue general obligation bonds in the principal amount of $38,000,000 bearing interest at rates within the legal limit for the purpose of acquiring property and to construct bridge expansions including Niblick Bridge; a Public Safety Center; Barney Schwartz Park; Airport Industrial Development Improvements; a Senior/Veterans Center; and Cuesta College Infrastructure Improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3825, "no_votes": 1778, "total_votes": 5603, "percent_yes": 68.2669998215242, "percent_no": 31.733000178475805, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.893748", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.171948", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of El Paso de Robles be authorized to issue general obligation bonds in the principal amount of $38,000,000 bearing interest at rates within the legal limit for the purpose of acquiring property and to construct bridge expansions including Niblick Bridge; a Public Safety Center; Barney Schwartz Park; Airport Industrial Development Improvements; a Senior/Veterans Center; and Cuesta College Infrastructure Improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10790, "fingerprint": "1998|199800458|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800458|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "2b4961b419eff47e", "measure_id": "199800458", "measure_letter": "F-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should Measure F-98, a measure enacting an ordinance to increase the City\u2019s Utility Users Tax from 1% to 4% with such increase to be used for the construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance of public streets, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 895, "no_votes": 2540, "total_votes": 3435, "percent_yes": 26.05531295487627, "percent_no": 73.94468704512373, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.895536", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.173053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Measure F-98, a measure enacting an ordinance to increase the City\u2019s Utility Users Tax from 1% to 4% with such increase to be used for the construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance of public streets, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10795, "fingerprint": "1998|199800554|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800554|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "2f23c1dd196dab6c", "measure_id": "199800554", "measure_letter": "G-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve classroom overcrowding and enhance student health and safety by purchasing land and constructing a new elementary school consisting of classrooms, cafeteria, computer lab, restrooms, school office, music and art classrooms, and to construct a cafeteria, restrooms, and music room at Santa Lucia School and other necessary site improvements, shall the Coast Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $13,900,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2130, "no_votes": 1439, "total_votes": 3569, "percent_yes": 59.680582796301486, "percent_no": 40.319417203698514, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.897076", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.173964", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve classroom overcrowding and enhance student health and safety by purchasing land and constructing a new elementary school consisting of classrooms, cafeteria, computer lab, restrooms, school office, music and art classrooms, and to construct a cafeteria, restrooms, and music room at Santa Lucia School and other necessary site improvements, shall the Coast Unified School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the amount of $13,900,000 at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10787, "fingerprint": "1998|199800455|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800455|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "2763aa57a7ca6daf", "measure_id": "199800455", "measure_letter": "H-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance amending Section 3-3.03 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (\u201chotel/motel bed tax\u201d) rate from, six percent (6%) to ten percent (10%) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2992, "no_votes": 3335, "total_votes": 6327, "percent_yes": 47.289394657815706, "percent_no": 52.710605342184294, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.894677", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.172496", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance amending Section 3-3.03 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax (\u201chotel/motel bed tax\u201d) rate from, six percent (6%) to ten percent (10%) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10788, "fingerprint": "1998|199800456|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800456|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "d7d40d76eaca6dbe", "measure_id": "199800456", "measure_letter": "I-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Beginning January 1, 2001, shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2486, "no_votes": 3615, "total_votes": 6101, "percent_yes": 40.74741845599082, "percent_no": 59.25258154400918, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.894967", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.172685", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Beginning January 1, 2001, shall the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10789, "fingerprint": "1998|199800457|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800457|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "75f8417fd34c5b08", "measure_id": "199800457", "measure_letter": "J-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City continue to collect a Utility Users Tax, currently at 2.4%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2112, "no_votes": 4148, "total_votes": 6260, "percent_yes": 33.73801916932908, "percent_no": 66.26198083067092, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.895249", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.172868", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City continue to collect a Utility Users Tax, currently at 2.4%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10786, "fingerprint": "1998|199800285|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800285|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "409d8c18a6bcd3c5", "measure_id": "199800285", "measure_letter": "M-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall an ordinance increasing the county-wide sales tax by one quarter percent as a transactions and use tax be approved as a special tax in which all revenue therefrom will be spent for capital improvements, operation of the inpatient unit, and emergency room services at General Hospital, thereby avoiding closure of General Hospital?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 39715, "no_votes": 41636, "total_votes": 81351, "percent_yes": 48.81931383756807, "percent_no": 51.18068616243193, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.894387", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.172311", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance increasing the county-wide sales tax by one quarter percent as a transactions and use tax be approved as a special tax in which all revenue therefrom will be spent for capital improvements, operation of the inpatient unit, and emergency room services at General Hospital, thereby avoiding closure of General Hospital?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10791, "fingerprint": "1998|199800459|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800459|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "0f9102f0d890e762", "measure_id": "199800459", "measure_letter": "N-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If the City Clerk is not a full-time employee of the City of El Paso de Robles, shall the City Clerk be paid a stipend equal to the amount paid to a member of the Paso Robles City Council, as such amount is established by state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3254, "no_votes": 2605, "total_votes": 5859, "percent_yes": 55.53848779655232, "percent_no": 44.46151220344768, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.895854", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.173240", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If the City Clerk is not a full-time employee of the City of El Paso de Robles, shall the City Clerk be paid a stipend equal to the amount paid to a member of the Paso Robles City Council, as such amount is established by state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10792, "fingerprint": "1998|199800460|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800460|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "04ceea15b79f1a75", "measure_id": "199800460", "measure_letter": "O-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "If the City Treasurer is not a full-time employee of the City of El Paso de Robles, shall the City Treasurer be paid a stipend equal to the amount paid to a member of the Paso Robles City Council, as such amount is established by state law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3183, "no_votes": 2620, "total_votes": 5803, "percent_yes": 54.85093916939514, "percent_no": 45.14906083060486, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.896167", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.173420", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "If the City Treasurer is not a full-time employee of the City of El Paso de Robles, shall the City Treasurer be paid a stipend equal to the amount paid to a member of the Paso Robles City Council, as such amount is established by state law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10793, "fingerprint": "1998|199800461|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800461|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "199800461", "measure_letter": "P-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2472, "no_votes": 3339, "total_votes": 5811, "percent_yes": 42.54001032524522, "percent_no": 57.45998967475478, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.896460", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.173601", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10794, "fingerprint": "1998|199800462|SAN LUIS OBISPO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800462|SAN LUIS OBISPO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "199800462", "measure_letter": "Q-9", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Luis Obispo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2386, "no_votes": 3486, "total_votes": 5872, "percent_yes": 40.63351498637602, "percent_no": 59.36648501362398, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.896744", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.173783", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Luis_Obispo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Luis Obispo County Elections", "url": "https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Clerk-Recorder/Elections.htm", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12271, "fingerprint": "1998|199800463|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800463|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "af393023659cec06", "measure_id": "199800463", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance be approved imposing a tax of 12% on the occupancy of hotel rooms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1583, "no_votes": 1093, "total_votes": 2676, "percent_yes": 59.15545590433483, "percent_no": 40.84454409566517, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.499874", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.899266", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.175256", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance be approved imposing a tax of 12% on the occupancy of hotel rooms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12270, "fingerprint": "1998|199800223|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800223|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "126a2e6bfb47ab2b", "measure_id": "199800223", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To upgrade and modernize aging schools, remove safety hazards, and reduce class size and overcrowding, shall the Portola Valley School District be authorized to issue $17,000,000 principal amount of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit for real property acquisition and improvement, such as: seismic strengthening of school buildings; constructing new computer-ready classrooms; science labs, and new library and computer technology centers; and replacing leaky roofs, broken heating systems, and deteriorating school walls, restrooms, and flooring?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2373, "no_votes": 695, "total_votes": 3068, "percent_yes": 77.34680573663624, "percent_no": 22.65319426336376, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.499616", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.898978", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.175074", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To upgrade and modernize aging schools, remove safety hazards, and reduce class size and overcrowding, shall the Portola Valley School District be authorized to issue $17,000,000 principal amount of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit for real property acquisition and improvement, such as: seismic strengthening of school buildings; constructing new computer-ready classrooms; science labs, and new library and computer technology centers; and replacing leaky roofs, broken heating systems, and deteriorating school walls, restrooms, and flooring?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10799, "fingerprint": "1998|199800060|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800060|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "259a8842be2bb1b2", "measure_id": "199800060", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Woodside School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $10,200,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit for the purpose of raising money for the acquisition and improvement of real property for authorized school purposes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 614, "no_votes": 528, "total_votes": 1142, "percent_yes": 53.76532399299475, "percent_no": 46.23467600700525, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.898371", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.174691", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Woodside School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $10,200,000 to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory limit for the purpose of raising money for the acquisition and improvement of real property for authorized school purposes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12274, "fingerprint": "1998|199800555|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800555|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "bdc948ea2c4c4848", "measure_id": "199800555", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide adequate classroom space and rehabilitate and expand school facilities, by financing repairs, improvements, renovation, acquisition of and additions to buildings and grounds, including libraries, science laboratories, improved student access to technology, upgraded heating, electrical and plumbing systems, and to build new classrooms, shall the San Mateo Union High School District be authorized to issue bonds in a an amount not to exceed $190,000,000 at interest rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 36798, "no_votes": 18768, "total_votes": 55566, "percent_yes": 66.22394989741929, "percent_no": 33.77605010258071, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.501050", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.900501", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.175996", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide adequate classroom space and rehabilitate and expand school facilities, by financing repairs, improvements, renovation, acquisition of and additions to buildings and grounds, including libraries, science laboratories, improved student access to technology, upgraded heating, electrical and plumbing systems, and to build new classrooms, shall the San Mateo Union High School District be authorized to issue bonds in a an amount not to exceed $190,000,000 at interest rates not exceeding the statutory limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12269, "fingerprint": "1998|199800172|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800172|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "33c46761bd8a01f3", "measure_id": "199800172", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance entitled: \u201cAn ordinance authorizing a special tax for police protection and fire protection and prevention and providing for an election thereon\u201d be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2803, "no_votes": 748, "total_votes": 3551, "percent_yes": 78.93551112362715, "percent_no": 21.06448887637285, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.499414", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.898676", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.174882", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance entitled: \u201cAn ordinance authorizing a special tax for police protection and fire protection and prevention and providing for an election thereon\u201d be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10798, "fingerprint": "1998|199800059|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800059|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "f59871a2a78bba46", "measure_id": "199800059", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the San Bruno Park School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of $30 million bearing interest at rates within the statutory maximum, for general renovation and improvements, such as upgrading systems to current standards (including fire alarms, plumbing, electrical, lighting, heating, ventilation, sewage and drainage systems); renovating classrooms, restrooms and kitchens; replacing worn out roofs, restoring playgrounds; incorporating infrastructure for technology; rebuilding fences, gates and walkways; adding classrooms to existing sites; and accommodating community needs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1868, "no_votes": 830, "total_votes": 2698, "percent_yes": 69.236471460341, "percent_no": 30.763528539659006, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.898080", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.174507", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Bruno Park School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness of $30 million bearing interest at rates within the statutory maximum, for general renovation and improvements, such as upgrading systems to current standards (including fire alarms, plumbing, electrical, lighting, heating, ventilation, sewage and drainage systems); renovating classrooms, restrooms and kitchens; replacing worn out roofs, restoring playgrounds; incorporating infrastructure for technology; rebuilding fences, gates and walkways; adding classrooms to existing sites; and accommodating community needs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12273, "fingerprint": "1998|199800466|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800466|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "09c7bbae0363c5ee", "measure_id": "199800466", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of San Mateo Municipal Code be amended to increase the Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax by 2%, effective January 1, 1999, with such increases being used to finance capital improvements for police and fire facilities as an initial priority, and then to streets and sidewalks, parks and other City buildings?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17604, "no_votes": 5059, "total_votes": 22663, "percent_yes": 77.67727132330229, "percent_no": 22.322728676697707, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.500708", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.900143", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.175812", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of San Mateo Municipal Code be amended to increase the Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax by 2%, effective January 1, 1999, with such increases being used to finance capital improvements for police and fire facilities as an initial priority, and then to streets and sidewalks, parks and other City buildings?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10796, "fingerprint": "1998|199800022|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800022|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "e381e29ec9633925", "measure_id": "199800022", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to move the General Municipal Election from April of even-numbered years to November of even-numbered years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 107, "no_votes": 38, "total_votes": 145, "percent_yes": 73.79310344827587, "percent_no": 26.206896551724128, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.897368", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.174147", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to move the General Municipal Election from April of even-numbered years to November of even-numbered years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12272, "fingerprint": "1998|199800465|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800465|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "99a09983da50ca60", "measure_id": "199800465", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted authorizing the City Council to allow or authorize the initiation or construction of a privately owned, multi-level parking structure at Huntington Avenue, Angus Avenue and Layne Place, subject to the City of San Bruno\u2019s development approval process?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 5926, "no_votes": 3212, "total_votes": 9138, "percent_yes": 64.85007660319545, "percent_no": 35.14992339680455, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.500396", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.899850", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.175619", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted authorizing the City Council to allow or authorize the initiation or construction of a privately owned, multi-level parking structure at Huntington Avenue, Angus Avenue and Layne Place, subject to the City of San Bruno\u2019s development approval process?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10797, "fingerprint": "1998|199800023|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800023|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "263c1adcba5fca22", "measure_id": "199800023", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to make the City Clerk an appointed officer?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 106, "no_votes": 38, "total_votes": 144, "percent_yes": 73.61111111111111, "percent_no": 26.388888888888886, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.897750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.174326", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted to make the City Clerk an appointed officer?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10800, "fingerprint": "1998|199800464|SAN MATEO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800464|SAN MATEO", "content_hash": "92033f8b7619d7b3", "measure_id": "199800464", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "San Mateo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 886, adopted by the Menlo Park City Council prohibiting the use of gasoline-powered leafblowers in Menlo Park, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4343, "no_votes": 5240, "total_votes": 9583, "percent_yes": 45.3198372117291, "percent_no": 54.6801627882709, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.899551", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.175439", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 886, adopted by the Menlo Park City Council prohibiting the use of gasoline-powered leafblowers in Menlo Park, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/San_Mateo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "San Mateo County Elections", "url": "https://www.smcacre.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10801, "fingerprint": "1998|199800024|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800024|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "7519816156d71e49", "measure_id": "199800024", "measure_letter": "G98", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance of the People of the City of Buellton, California that adopts the Transient Occupancy Tax, which applies only to transient occupants of hotels (as defined in Section 3.28.020), all as set forth in Chapter 3.28 of the Buellton Municipal Code, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 630, "no_votes": 124, "total_votes": 754, "percent_yes": 83.55437665782493, "percent_no": 16.445623342175068, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.900839", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.176177", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance of the People of the City of Buellton, California that adopts the Transient Occupancy Tax, which applies only to transient occupants of hotels (as defined in Section 3.28.020), all as set forth in Chapter 3.28 of the Buellton Municipal Code, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10802, "fingerprint": "1998|199800025|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800025|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "33e36bbfb6f5c561", "measure_id": "199800025", "measure_letter": "H98", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance of the People of the City of Buellton, California that retroactively approves the Transient Occupancy Tax, which applies only to transient occupants of hotels (as defined in Section 3.28.020), all as set forth in Chapter 3.28 of the Buellton Municipal Code, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 610, "no_votes": 156, "total_votes": 766, "percent_yes": 79.63446475195822, "percent_no": 20.36553524804178, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.901192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.176356", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance of the People of the City of Buellton, California that retroactively approves the Transient Occupancy Tax, which applies only to transient occupants of hotels (as defined in Section 3.28.020), all as set forth in Chapter 3.28 of the Buellton Municipal Code, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10803, "fingerprint": "1998|199800224|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800224|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "97877807e6e2fa3f", "measure_id": "199800224", "measure_letter": "I98", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To ease overcrowding and accommodate class-size reduction by building a new school and replacing old portables, to upgrade classrooms for technology, to construct permanent libraries, and to repair items like wiring, plumbing, heating, and leaky roofs, shall the Santa Barbara Elementary School District issue $25,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit of reconstruction of school facilities, acquisition of sites and classrooms and repair and improvement of school throughout the District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15489, "no_votes": 4606, "total_votes": 20095, "percent_yes": 77.0788753421249, "percent_no": 22.921124657875097, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.901483", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.176536", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To ease overcrowding and accommodate class-size reduction by building a new school and replacing old portables, to upgrade classrooms for technology, to construct permanent libraries, and to repair items like wiring, plumbing, heating, and leaky roofs, shall the Santa Barbara Elementary School District issue $25,000,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit of reconstruction of school facilities, acquisition of sites and classrooms and repair and improvement of school throughout the District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10804, "fingerprint": "1998|199800286|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800286|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "dcf39fc6f8a6f132", "measure_id": "199800286", "measure_letter": "K98", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance titled Native Oak Protection measure submitted by initiative petition to amend the County General Plan and zoning ordinances be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 53123, "no_votes": 55006, "total_votes": 108129, "percent_yes": 49.12928076649187, "percent_no": 50.87071923350813, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.901772", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.176725", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance titled Native Oak Protection measure submitted by initiative petition to amend the County General Plan and zoning ordinances be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10806, "fingerprint": "1998|199800467|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800467|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "ad11377402e61bac", "measure_id": "199800467", "measure_letter": "L98", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1438(98) be adopted to approve a Utility User Tax with a fixed rate of 2.5% upon the use of all utilities within the City of Lompos, as specified in the Ordinance, in order to maintain and enhance public services and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City of Lompoc?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3453, "no_votes": 5522, "total_votes": 8975, "percent_yes": 38.47353760445682, "percent_no": 61.52646239554318, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.902386", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.177091", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1438(98) be adopted to approve a Utility User Tax with a fixed rate of 2.5% upon the use of all utilities within the City of Lompos, as specified in the Ordinance, in order to maintain and enhance public services and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City of Lompoc?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10807, "fingerprint": "1998|199800556|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800556|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "6b93906fc3edace3", "measure_id": "199800556", "measure_letter": "N98", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Santa Maria-Bonita School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $33 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law to build and acquire new schools and facilities, to renovate classrooms, and to provide site improvements, to enhance health, safety and instructional programs?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7794, "no_votes": 5291, "total_votes": 13085, "percent_yes": 59.56438670233092, "percent_no": 40.43561329766908, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.902718", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.177278", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Santa Maria-Bonita School District incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $33 million with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law to build and acquire new schools and facilities, to renovate classrooms, and to provide site improvements, to enhance health, safety and instructional programs?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10805, "fingerprint": "1998|199800287|SANTA BARBARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800287|SANTA BARBARA", "content_hash": "383a832db71daf18", "measure_id": "199800287", "measure_letter": "O98", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Barbara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the proposed ordinance titled Alternative Native Oak Protection Measure submitted by the Board of Supervisors to amend the County General Plan and zoning ordinances be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 40016, "no_votes": 63585, "total_votes": 103601, "percent_yes": 38.62510979623749, "percent_no": 61.37489020376251, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.902095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.176909", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the proposed ordinance titled Alternative Native Oak Protection Measure submitted by the Board of Supervisors to amend the County General Plan and zoning ordinances be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Barbara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Barbara County Elections", "url": "https://countyofsb.org/care/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12279, "fingerprint": "1998|199800288|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800288|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "5fbad44ee53d7d04", "measure_id": "199800288", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Without increasing local taxes, may publicly assisted providers develop, subject to local zoning and approval procedures, rental housing for the elderly, disabled, families and individuals of low income, in the municipalities and urban service areas within Santa Clara County, in annual amounts which, apart from any existing authority for the development of such housing, do not exceed 1/10th of 1% of the total housing units within the municipalities and urban service areas as of the 1990 census?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 221395, "no_votes": 109554, "total_votes": 330949, "percent_yes": 66.89701434359976, "percent_no": 33.102985656400236, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.506628", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.906894", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.179700", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Without increasing local taxes, may publicly assisted providers develop, subject to local zoning and approval procedures, rental housing for the elderly, disabled, families and individuals of low income, in the municipalities and urban service areas within Santa Clara County, in annual amounts which, apart from any existing authority for the development of such housing, do not exceed 1/10th of 1% of the total housing units within the municipalities and urban service areas as of the 1990 census?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12275, "fingerprint": "1998|199800136|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800136|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "4adfae2cfb98538f", "measure_id": "199800136", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the county of Santa Clara amend the following sections of the County Charter:  Article III, Section 301, paragraph (b), and Article VII, Section 701, paragraph (a), lines #4 and #5; Article II, Section 203; Article II, Section 206;  Article VII, Section 705, Article II, Section 202; Article III, Section 301, Article V, Section 507, Article VIII, Section 803, Article V, Section 503, Article VI, Section 601, and Article VII, Sections 701, 704, and 709?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 128076, "no_votes": 75310, "total_votes": 203386, "percent_yes": 62.97188597051912, "percent_no": 37.02811402948088, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.505554", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.905627", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.178969", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the county of Santa Clara amend the following sections of the County Charter:  Article III, Section 301, paragraph (b), and Article VII, Section 701, paragraph (a), lines #4 and #5; Article II, Section 203; Article II, Section 206;  Article VII, Section 705, Article II, Section 202; Article III, Section 301, Article V, Section 507, Article VIII, Section 803, Article V, Section 503, Article VI, Section 601, and Article VII, Sections 701, 704, and 709?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10811, "fingerprint": "1998|199800064|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800064|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0a5a47a045cc7afb", "measure_id": "199800064", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Los Gatos Union School District be authorized to increase, for the first time in eight years, the special parcel tax from its original sum of $180 to $250 per parcel per year and increase its Gann Appropriations Limit by the amount of the revenue generated by that special tax in order to maintain low class size, provide enhanced services and instructional programs and maintain aging facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4041, "no_votes": 974, "total_votes": 5015, "percent_yes": 80.57826520438684, "percent_no": 19.421734795613162, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.903965", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.178038", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Los Gatos Union School District be authorized to increase, for the first time in eight years, the special parcel tax from its original sum of $180 to $250 per parcel per year and increase its Gann Appropriations Limit by the amount of the revenue generated by that special tax in order to maintain low class size, provide enhanced services and instructional programs and maintain aging facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10832, "fingerprint": "1998|199800483|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800483|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "497867545ff0a1b4", "measure_id": "199800483", "measure_letter": "AA", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the existing ordinances implementing the New Realities Task Force recommendations which provide for a limited inflationary adjustment for business taxes, the collection of the existing utility tax on out-of-state telephone service, and an alternative business tax on fuel tank farms, be continued?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 61045, "no_votes": 82164, "total_votes": 143209, "percent_yes": 42.62651090364432, "percent_no": 57.37348909635568, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.913031", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.183579", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the existing ordinances implementing the New Realities Task Force recommendations which provide for a limited inflationary adjustment for business taxes, the collection of the existing utility tax on out-of-state telephone service, and an alternative business tax on fuel tank farms, be continued?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12280, "fingerprint": "1998|199800289|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800289|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "49c0673a3920a373", "measure_id": "199800289", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Santa Clara amend section 712 by deleting the words \u201cjudges of the justice courts?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 182054, "no_votes": 114191, "total_votes": 296245, "percent_yes": 61.45386420023967, "percent_no": 38.54613579976033, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.506877", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.907192", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.179885", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Santa Clara amend section 712 by deleting the words \u201cjudges of the justice courts?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12278, "fingerprint": "1998|199800225|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800225|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c5d8d8c00625f51a", "measure_id": "199800225", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of Los Gatos and Saratoga High Schools; replace inadequate or unsafe electrical systems; repair deteriorated roofs, plumbing and sewer systems; reduce dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades; upgrade classrooms and restrooms; acquire, construct, repair and modernize school facilities; relieve overcrowding and comply with health and safety codes, shall the Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School District issue $79 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12530, "no_votes": 2939, "total_votes": 15469, "percent_yes": 81.0007110996186, "percent_no": 18.9992889003814, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.506354", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.906618", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.179517", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of Los Gatos and Saratoga High Schools; replace inadequate or unsafe electrical systems; repair deteriorated roofs, plumbing and sewer systems; reduce dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades; upgrade classrooms and restrooms; acquire, construct, repair and modernize school facilities; relieve overcrowding and comply with health and safety codes, shall the Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School District issue $79 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10810, "fingerprint": "1998|199800063|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800063|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6bc1fd5d2174b39d", "measure_id": "199800063", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable the Lakeside Joint School District to improve the health and safety conditions of Lakeside School, including the renovation of heating, plumbing and electrical systems, and to expand existing facilities, including the construction of a multi-use room and additional classrooms, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $1,450,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum set by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 106, "no_votes": 26, "total_votes": 132, "percent_yes": 80.3030303030303, "percent_no": 19.696969696969703, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.903672", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.177849", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable the Lakeside Joint School District to improve the health and safety conditions of Lakeside School, including the renovation of heating, plumbing and electrical systems, and to expand existing facilities, including the construction of a multi-use room and additional classrooms, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $1,450,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum set by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10833, "fingerprint": "1998|199800484|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800484|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "9cef27aba381df2f", "measure_id": "199800484", "measure_letter": "BB", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall City Charter Section 1217 be amended to allow the City the option of including provisions in publicly bid contracts for contractor participation in an apprenticeship program for at-risk youth?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 83762, "no_votes": 59867, "total_votes": 143629, "percent_yes": 58.31830619164653, "percent_no": 41.68169380835347, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.913302", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.183795", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall City Charter Section 1217 be amended to allow the City the option of including provisions in publicly bid contracts for contractor participation in an apprenticeship program for at-risk youth?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12281, "fingerprint": "1998|199800290|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800290|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "dc6cf8e45eb2fff8", "measure_id": "199800290", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Santa Clara delete section 507 eliminating the Intergovernmental Council and amend section 301 by adding a new sub-section (b) to the powers and duties of the Board of Supervisors providing, \u201cEncourage cooperation among local public agencies both within Santa Clara County and San Francisco Bay Area.  When appropriate recommend and promote solutions to regional issues of mutual concern to Santa Clara County and other agencies\u201d and reletter subsections accordingly?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 180924, "no_votes": 105890, "total_votes": 286814, "percent_yes": 63.08060275997684, "percent_no": 36.91939724002316, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.507143", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.907468", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.180069", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Santa Clara delete section 507 eliminating the Intergovernmental Council and amend section 301 by adding a new sub-section (b) to the powers and duties of the Board of Supervisors providing, \u201cEncourage cooperation among local public agencies both within Santa Clara County and San Francisco Bay Area.  When appropriate recommend and promote solutions to regional issues of mutual concern to Santa Clara County and other agencies\u201d and reletter subsections accordingly?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12276, "fingerprint": "1998|199800173|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800173|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "17679e6e838e482e", "measure_id": "199800173", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Morgan Hill Redevelopment Plan be extended to accomplish, without bonded indebtedness, the following:  minimize flooding, build a new library and community center, build a new senior center and aquatics center, purchase land for a soccer complex, develop a sports complex, improve water, sewer, and street systems, reduce sewer and water debt charges, promote economic developments for no more than $147 million.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4374, "no_votes": 1819, "total_votes": 6193, "percent_yes": 70.62812853221378, "percent_no": 29.37187146778622, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.505826", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.905958", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.179151", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Morgan Hill Redevelopment Plan be extended to accomplish, without bonded indebtedness, the following:  minimize flooding, build a new library and community center, build a new senior center and aquatics center, purchase land for a soccer complex, develop a sports complex, improve water, sewer, and street systems, reduce sewer and water debt charges, promote economic developments for no more than $147 million.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10815, "fingerprint": "1998|199800068|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800068|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "80cb9fba543a956a", "measure_id": "199800068", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 1991 be continued for four years thus allowing the district to continue to expend the funds generated by the existing special tax of $68 per parcel for expenditures for remedial services, repair of school buildings and grounds, purchase of instructional supplies and equipment, installation of energy conservation equipment, and restoration of services reduced in prior years in the library, counseling, custodial and maintenance areas?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2893, "no_votes": 1301, "total_votes": 4194, "percent_yes": 68.9794945159752, "percent_no": 31.020505484024795, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.905347", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.178788", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 1991 be continued for four years thus allowing the district to continue to expend the funds generated by the existing special tax of $68 per parcel for expenditures for remedial services, repair of school buildings and grounds, purchase of instructional supplies and equipment, installation of energy conservation equipment, and restoration of services reduced in prior years in the library, counseling, custodial and maintenance areas?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10834, "fingerprint": "1998|199800485|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800485|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "715884b69e3594c4", "measure_id": "199800485", "measure_letter": "CC", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the San Jose City Charter be amended to implement the recommendations of the New Realities Task Force that the terms of the Civil Service Commissioners be reduced from six years to four years, and to delete provisions relating to the filing of Commissioner vacancies, removal of Commissioners from office and disciplinary action of City employees so that these provisions are addressed in the San Jose Municipal Code instead?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 99932, "no_votes": 38947, "total_votes": 138879, "percent_yes": 71.95616327882544, "percent_no": 28.043836721174557, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.913601", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.184012", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the San Jose City Charter be amended to implement the recommendations of the New Realities Task Force that the terms of the Civil Service Commissioners be reduced from six years to four years, and to delete provisions relating to the filing of Commissioner vacancies, removal of Commissioners from office and disciplinary action of City employees so that these provisions are addressed in the San Jose Municipal Code instead?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12282, "fingerprint": "1998|199800291|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800291|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "fd038e6786b28371", "measure_id": "199800291", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Santa Clara amend section 506: to add \u201ccommittees\u201d following \u201cboards\u201d throughout the section to refer to \u201cboards, committees and commissions,\u201d add \u201cby laws, quorum requirements\u201d to the second paragraph after \u201cmeeting times\u201d and delete paragraph six, allowing organizational and administrative issues to be addressed by ordinance, rather than the charter, and add a provision providing flexibility in the residency requirement by allowing the Board to waive that requirement?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 133970, "no_votes": 154263, "total_votes": 288233, "percent_yes": 46.479757696030646, "percent_no": 53.520242303969354, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.507410", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.907749", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.180265", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Santa Clara amend section 506: to add \u201ccommittees\u201d following \u201cboards\u201d throughout the section to refer to \u201cboards, committees and commissions,\u201d add \u201cby laws, quorum requirements\u201d to the second paragraph after \u201cmeeting times\u201d and delete paragraph six, allowing organizational and administrative issues to be addressed by ordinance, rather than the charter, and add a provision providing flexibility in the residency requirement by allowing the Board to waive that requirement?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12277, "fingerprint": "1998|199800174|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800174|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3f9a6c97284b61de", "measure_id": "199800174", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1706 approving a development agreement between the City of Santa Clara and Sun Microsystems Corporation for approximately 82 acres of State of California owned real property located a the northeast corner of Montague Expressway and Lafayette Street be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11405, "no_votes": 6371, "total_votes": 17776, "percent_yes": 64.1595409540954, "percent_no": 35.840459045904595, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.506087", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.906292", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.179331", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1706 approving a development agreement between the City of Santa Clara and Sun Microsystems Corporation for approximately 82 acres of State of California owned real property located a the northeast corner of Montague Expressway and Lafayette Street be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10814, "fingerprint": "1998|199800067|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800067|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e34fc6c5abd3c579", "measure_id": "199800067", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding and maintain smaller school and class size, should the Mountain View Elementary School District issue bonds for the repair and rehabilitation of local elementary schools, construct and acquire additional classrooms and school facilities as needed; renovate existing schools, including upgrade electrical wiring for safety and capacity, renovate aged heating and plumbing systems, upgrade restrooms, in the amount of $36 million at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3460, "no_votes": 733, "total_votes": 4193, "percent_yes": 82.51848318626281, "percent_no": 17.481516813737187, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.905051", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.178603", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding and maintain smaller school and class size, should the Mountain View Elementary School District issue bonds for the repair and rehabilitation of local elementary schools, construct and acquire additional classrooms and school facilities as needed; renovate existing schools, including upgrade electrical wiring for safety and capacity, renovate aged heating and plumbing systems, upgrade restrooms, in the amount of $36 million at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12283, "fingerprint": "1998|199800292|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800292|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0c7dd37942a53b64", "measure_id": "199800292", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Santa Clara amend section 202 to limit the number of terms a member of the Board of Supervisors may serve to three terms, consisting of four years each?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 169796, "no_votes": 136247, "total_votes": 306043, "percent_yes": 55.48109252621364, "percent_no": 44.51890747378636, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.507648", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.908076", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.180454", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Santa Clara amend section 202 to limit the number of terms a member of the Board of Supervisors may serve to three terms, consisting of four years each?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10812, "fingerprint": "1998|199800065|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800065|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cb35ef69e79c18c1", "measure_id": "199800065", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to permit the Morgan Hill Unified School District to finance construction of a new high school, construction of a new elementary school, and renovations to Live Oak High School, shall the District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness for the acquisition and improvement of real property for authorized school purposes, in the amount not to exceed $70,000,000, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3575, "no_votes": 2288, "total_votes": 5863, "percent_yes": 60.97560975609756, "percent_no": 39.02439024390244, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.904254", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.178222", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to permit the Morgan Hill Unified School District to finance construction of a new high school, construction of a new elementary school, and renovations to Live Oak High School, shall the District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness for the acquisition and improvement of real property for authorized school purposes, in the amount not to exceed $70,000,000, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10816, "fingerprint": "1998|199800293|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800293|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cdf99bf01be5094e", "measure_id": "199800293", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the County of Santa Clara add section 208 stating, \u201cNothing in this Charter shall preclude the Board of Supervisors from authorizing an instant run-off voting system of the November general election, which eliminates the need for run-off elections, when such technology is available to the County?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 158624, "no_votes": 135525, "total_votes": 294149, "percent_yes": 53.926411444540015, "percent_no": 46.073588555459985, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.908355", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.180635", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the County of Santa Clara add section 208 stating, \u201cNothing in this Charter shall preclude the Board of Supervisors from authorizing an instant run-off voting system of the November general election, which eliminates the need for run-off elections, when such technology is available to the County?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12285, "fingerprint": "1998|199800558|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800558|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "cb35ef69e79c18c1", "measure_id": "199800558", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to permit the Morgan Hill Unified School District to finance construction of a new high school, construction of a new elementary school, and renovations to Live Oak High School, shall the District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness for the acquisition and improvement of real property for authorized school purposes, in the amount not to exceed $70,000,000, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8781, "no_votes": 5179, "total_votes": 13960, "percent_yes": 62.90114613180515, "percent_no": 37.09885386819485, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.513949", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.916072", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.184762", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to permit the Morgan Hill Unified School District to finance construction of a new high school, construction of a new elementary school, and renovations to Live Oak High School, shall the District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness for the acquisition and improvement of real property for authorized school purposes, in the amount not to exceed $70,000,000, to bear interest at rates not exceeding the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10808, "fingerprint": "1998|199800061|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800061|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "99b9c71a1e5806b4", "measure_id": "199800061", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Berryessa Union Elementary School District repair deteriorating plumbing, sewer, lighting, heating, ventilation, electrical and security systems; renovate classrooms and bathrooms, upgrade local school facilities to comply with current safety standards; build and acquire additional classrooms, school sites and facilities; reduce the risk of injury from earthquakes with seismic upgrades; and repair worn out roofs, by issuing $50 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3017, "no_votes": 2017, "total_votes": 5034, "percent_yes": 59.93245927691696, "percent_no": 40.06754072308304, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.903038", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.177462", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Berryessa Union Elementary School District repair deteriorating plumbing, sewer, lighting, heating, ventilation, electrical and security systems; renovate classrooms and bathrooms, upgrade local school facilities to comply with current safety standards; build and acquire additional classrooms, school sites and facilities; reduce the risk of injury from earthquakes with seismic upgrades; and repair worn out roofs, by issuing $50 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12284, "fingerprint": "1998|199800557|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800557|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ad7b193ee8d55bd0", "measure_id": "199800557", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To relieve overcrowding and to repair and rehabilitate aging local schools, shall the Los Altos School District issue bonds to construct and acquire additional classrooms and school facilities as needed, and to renovate existing schools, including upgrading electrical wiring for safety and capacity, renovating aged plumbing systems and upgrading restrooms, in a total amount not to exceed $94.7 million at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12000, "no_votes": 3832, "total_votes": 15832, "percent_yes": 75.79585649317838, "percent_no": 24.204143506821623, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.513742", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.915334", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.184563", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To relieve overcrowding and to repair and rehabilitate aging local schools, shall the Los Altos School District issue bonds to construct and acquire additional classrooms and school facilities as needed, and to renovate existing schools, including upgrading electrical wiring for safety and capacity, renovating aged plumbing systems and upgrading restrooms, in a total amount not to exceed $94.7 million at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10809, "fingerprint": "1998|199800062|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800062|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6ead0b9d7b502816", "measure_id": "199800062", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions and enhance educational opportunities at Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook and Mona Vista High Schools, including repairing or replacing deteriorating electrical, heating and plumbing systems and restrooms to comply with current safety standards, reducing earthquake danger with seismic upgrades, and replacing worn roofs, shall the Fremont Union High School District issue $144 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, repair, construct and modernize classrooms and school facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15674, "no_votes": 4176, "total_votes": 19850, "percent_yes": 78.96221662468513, "percent_no": 21.037783375314874, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.903380", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.177643", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions and enhance educational opportunities at Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook and Mona Vista High Schools, including repairing or replacing deteriorating electrical, heating and plumbing systems and restrooms to comply with current safety standards, reducing earthquake danger with seismic upgrades, and replacing worn roofs, shall the Fremont Union High School District issue $144 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit, to acquire, repair, construct and modernize classrooms and school facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12286, "fingerprint": "1998|199800559|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800559|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b102937853cf7b1d", "measure_id": "199800559", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall San Jose/Evergreen Community College District repair and rehabilitate its San Jose City College and Evergreen Valley College facilities to meet current health, safety, accessibility, and instructional standards; replace aging roofs, inadequate lighting, deteriorated plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; refurbish classrooms, laboratories, restrooms, vocational training facilities, and construct technology centers, libraries and classrooms by issuing $135,750,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 97031, "no_votes": 33484, "total_votes": 130515, "percent_yes": 74.34471133586177, "percent_no": 25.655288664138226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.514151", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.916679", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.185055", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall San Jose/Evergreen Community College District repair and rehabilitate its San Jose City College and Evergreen Valley College facilities to meet current health, safety, accessibility, and instructional standards; replace aging roofs, inadequate lighting, deteriorated plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; refurbish classrooms, laboratories, restrooms, vocational training facilities, and construct technology centers, libraries and classrooms by issuing $135,750,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10813, "fingerprint": "1998|199800066|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800066|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "dba87b240eac37cf", "measure_id": "199800066", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood schools, including replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, eliminating hazards from asbestos, reducing dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades, upgrading children\u2019s restrooms, acquiring, construction and modernizing school facilities to relieve overcrowding, shall the Mount Pleasant Elementary School District issue twelve million dollars of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit, with all proceeds staying locally to benefit local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1146, "no_votes": 287, "total_votes": 1433, "percent_yes": 79.97208653175157, "percent_no": 20.02791346824843, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.904570", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.178406", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of neighborhood schools, including replacing inadequate or unsafe electrical and heating systems, repairing deteriorating roofs, plumbing and sewer systems, eliminating hazards from asbestos, reducing dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades, upgrading children\u2019s restrooms, acquiring, construction and modernizing school facilities to relieve overcrowding, shall the Mount Pleasant Elementary School District issue twelve million dollars of bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit, with all proceeds staying locally to benefit local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10825, "fingerprint": "1998|199800476|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800476|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ee17ca84c9932678", "measure_id": "199800476", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted limiting the number of terms a member of the Monte Sereno City Council may serve on the City Council to two consecutive four year terms with a right to run for office again only after at least two years have elapsed since that person last held office?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 997, "no_votes": 467, "total_votes": 1464, "percent_yes": 68.10109289617486, "percent_no": 31.898907103825138, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.911002", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.182298", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted limiting the number of terms a member of the Monte Sereno City Council may serve on the City Council to two consecutive four year terms with a right to run for office again only after at least two years have elapsed since that person last held office?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10819, "fingerprint": "1998|199800470|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800470|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e0ee03b7ed2fa854", "measure_id": "199800470", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 800 of the City Charter be amended to delete the provision which required that the City Administrator prepare and submit to the City Council, and requiring the Council to adopt, the first administrative code after the Charter was established?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3672, "no_votes": 2223, "total_votes": 5895, "percent_yes": 62.29007633587786, "percent_no": 37.70992366412214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.909261", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.181186", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 800 of the City Charter be amended to delete the provision which required that the City Administrator prepare and submit to the City Council, and requiring the Council to adopt, the first administrative code after the Charter was established?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10820, "fingerprint": "1998|199800471|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800471|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "51815475d95cf904", "measure_id": "199800471", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 811 of the City Charter be amended to bar the City from discriminating against, or from favoring a City employee or person seeking employment with the City, on the basis of political opinion or affiliations or membership in a lawful employees association, or because of race, color, religion, gender, national origin, age, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or veteran\u2019s status?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4733, "no_votes": 1559, "total_votes": 6292, "percent_yes": 75.22250476795931, "percent_no": 24.777495232040692, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.909560", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.181367", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 811 of the City Charter be amended to bar the City from discriminating against, or from favoring a City employee or person seeking employment with the City, on the basis of political opinion or affiliations or membership in a lawful employees association, or because of race, color, religion, gender, national origin, age, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or veteran\u2019s status?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10821, "fingerprint": "1998|199800472|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800472|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "bdf4e6536e296d13", "measure_id": "199800472", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1000 of the City Charter be amended to remove from the list of positions coming within the jurisdiction of the General Service the position of school crossing guards?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3543, "no_votes": 2440, "total_votes": 5983, "percent_yes": 59.21778372054154, "percent_no": 40.78221627945846, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.909868", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.181555", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1000 of the City Charter be amended to remove from the list of positions coming within the jurisdiction of the General Service the position of school crossing guards?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10822, "fingerprint": "1998|199800473|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800473|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "b31869b107b097a9", "measure_id": "199800473", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1104 of the City Charter be amended to allow the City Administrator to transfer unused budgetary amounts from one account to another as long as the total appropriations approved by the City Council for any fund or department are not affected by the transfer during any fiscal year?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3524, "no_votes": 2655, "total_votes": 6179, "percent_yes": 57.03188218158278, "percent_no": 42.96811781841722, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.910140", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.181739", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1104 of the City Charter be amended to allow the City Administrator to transfer unused budgetary amounts from one account to another as long as the total appropriations approved by the City Council for any fund or department are not affected by the transfer during any fiscal year?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10826, "fingerprint": "1998|199800477|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800477|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "6c4f3ca6a8c68a22", "measure_id": "199800477", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Mountain View fluoridate its municipal water supply?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 10316, "no_votes": 6921, "total_votes": 17237, "percent_yes": 59.84800139235366, "percent_no": 40.15199860764634, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.911295", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.182479", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Mountain View fluoridate its municipal water supply?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10827, "fingerprint": "1998|199800478|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800478|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "49d40a90dce49d6f", "measure_id": "199800478", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 710 of the City Charter, relating to the duties of the City Auditor, be amended to set forth the duties of the City Auditor and eliminate those duties currently performed by the City Finance and Administrative Service Director?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7350, "no_votes": 5315, "total_votes": 12665, "percent_yes": 58.03395183576786, "percent_no": 41.96604816423214, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.911560", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.182659", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 710 of the City Charter, relating to the duties of the City Auditor, be amended to set forth the duties of the City Auditor and eliminate those duties currently performed by the City Finance and Administrative Service Director?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10828, "fingerprint": "1998|199800479|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800479|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "c21bd3f039f0861c", "measure_id": "199800479", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1107 of the City Charter be amended to allow the City Council to adopt by ordinance an alternate bidding process for public works projects and limiting the dollar amount to that set by State Law for general law cities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7312, "no_votes": 5437, "total_votes": 12749, "percent_yes": 57.35351792297435, "percent_no": 42.64648207702565, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.911827", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.182839", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1107 of the City Charter be amended to allow the City Council to adopt by ordinance an alternate bidding process for public works projects and limiting the dollar amount to that set by State Law for general law cities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10829, "fingerprint": "1998|199800480|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800480|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "0dfe4020343194d8", "measure_id": "199800480", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Mountain View amend the following sections of the City Charter: Sections 501, 505, 513 and 520 of Article V; Sections 706 and 711 of Article VII; Section 905 of Article IX; Section 1001 of Article X; Section 1204 of Article XII; Section 1604 of Article XVI; and delete Section 903 of Article IX and Section 1203 of Article XII?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6173, "no_votes": 5801, "total_votes": 11974, "percent_yes": 51.55336562552196, "percent_no": 48.44663437447804, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.912092", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.183019", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Mountain View amend the following sections of the City Charter: Sections 501, 505, 513 and 520 of Article V; Sections 706 and 711 of Article VII; Section 905 of Article IX; Section 1001 of Article X; Section 1204 of Article XII; Section 1604 of Article XVI; and delete Section 903 of Article IX and Section 1203 of Article XII?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10835, "fingerprint": "1998|199800486|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800486|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "037299c3869f8a1c", "measure_id": "199800486", "measure_letter": "S", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Sunnyvale City Charter be amended to require voter approval of any labor agreement resulting from binding arbitration or fact finding before the agreement may become effective, if the provisions negatively affect management rights or require additional revenues or appropriations, or if either side wishes to seek voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12056, "no_votes": 17851, "total_votes": 29907, "percent_yes": 40.31163272812385, "percent_no": 59.68836727187615, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.913928", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.184198", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sunnyvale City Charter be amended to require voter approval of any labor agreement resulting from binding arbitration or fact finding before the agreement may become effective, if the provisions negatively affect management rights or require additional revenues or appropriations, or if either side wishes to seek voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10836, "fingerprint": "1998|199800487|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800487|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "e0a79c3b33873e77", "measure_id": "199800487", "measure_letter": "T", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Sunnyvale City Charter be amended to provide that disputes about wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment that cannot be resolved by negotiations between the City and the Public Safety Officers Association and the Communications Officers Association be subject to binding arbitration which is final without City Council or voter approval?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15009, "no_votes": 15276, "total_votes": 30285, "percent_yes": 49.55918771669143, "percent_no": 50.44081228330857, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.914576", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.184384", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sunnyvale City Charter be amended to provide that disputes about wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment that cannot be resolved by negotiations between the City and the Public Safety Officers Association and the Communications Officers Association be subject to binding arbitration which is final without City Council or voter approval?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10817, "fingerprint": "1998|199800468|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800468|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "8e99038da5cbf94d", "measure_id": "199800468", "measure_letter": "U", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should Ordinance 1920 increasing the city of Campbell Transient Occupancy Tax Rate on hotel/motel room stays from 8% to 10% be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4605, "no_votes": 4132, "total_votes": 8737, "percent_yes": 52.70687879134714, "percent_no": 47.29312120865286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.908628", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.180826", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Ordinance 1920 increasing the city of Campbell Transient Occupancy Tax Rate on hotel/motel room stays from 8% to 10% be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10818, "fingerprint": "1998|199800469|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800469|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "ba056d816d8db837", "measure_id": "199800469", "measure_letter": "V", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Campbell impose term limits on City Councilmembers?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6400, "no_votes": 2461, "total_votes": 8861, "percent_yes": 72.22661099198736, "percent_no": 27.773389008012643, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.908967", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.181007", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Campbell impose term limits on City Councilmembers?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10830, "fingerprint": "1998|199800481|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800481|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "83c940199f3455ee", "measure_id": "199800481", "measure_letter": "W", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the unincorporated area of Santa Clara County known as \u201cRancho Rinconada\u201d be annexed to the City of Cupertino?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 817, "no_votes": 415, "total_votes": 1232, "percent_yes": 66.31493506493507, "percent_no": 33.68506493506493, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.912366", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.183198", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the unincorporated area of Santa Clara County known as \u201cRancho Rinconada\u201d be annexed to the City of Cupertino?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10831, "fingerprint": "1998|199800482|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800482|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "1203a9f49324f123", "measure_id": "199800482", "measure_letter": "X", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In the event that the unincorporated area of Santa Clara County, known as \u201cRancho Rinconada\u201d (as more specifically described in the full ballot measure), is annexed to the City of Cupertino, shall the city\u2019s existing utility users excise tax, imposed on electric, gas, and telephone users throughout the city at a rate of 2.4% of the monthly bills for said utility services (subject to an exemption for senior citizens) be extended to this area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 678, "no_votes": 539, "total_votes": 1217, "percent_yes": 55.71076417419884, "percent_no": 44.28923582580116, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.912669", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.183385", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In the event that the unincorporated area of Santa Clara County, known as \u201cRancho Rinconada\u201d (as more specifically described in the full ballot measure), is annexed to the City of Cupertino, shall the city\u2019s existing utility users excise tax, imposed on electric, gas, and telephone users throughout the city at a rate of 2.4% of the monthly bills for said utility services (subject to an exemption for senior citizens) be extended to this area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10823, "fingerprint": "1998|199800474|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800474|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "a1c08f7ed6f20643", "measure_id": "199800474", "measure_letter": "Y", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do the qualified voters of the Town of Los Altos Hills approve the ordinance stating:  No person shall be allowed to serve more than two (2) consecutive terms on the Los Altos Hills City council.  Notwithstanding the above, at any municipal election after the expiration of two years following the two (2) consecutive terms, such person may again seek election or appointment to the City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2371, "no_votes": 1106, "total_votes": 3477, "percent_yes": 68.19096922634455, "percent_no": 31.80903077365545, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.910410", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.181930", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do the qualified voters of the Town of Los Altos Hills approve the ordinance stating:  No person shall be allowed to serve more than two (2) consecutive terms on the Los Altos Hills City council.  Notwithstanding the above, at any municipal election after the expiration of two years following the two (2) consecutive terms, such person may again seek election or appointment to the City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10824, "fingerprint": "1998|199800475|SANTA CLARA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800475|SANTA CLARA", "content_hash": "3598ad2a679c161b", "measure_id": "199800475", "measure_letter": "Z", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Clara", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that amends the Milpitas General Land Use Plan to create an Urban Growth Boundary near the base of the Milpitas foothills, effective for twenty years, that would limit development with the city to the valley floor on the base of the foothills by prohibiting the City from providing city services such as police, fire, sewer and water to new land use developments in the hillside area?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6065, "no_votes": 4897, "total_votes": 10962, "percent_yes": 55.32749498266739, "percent_no": 44.67250501733261, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.910733", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.182111", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted that amends the Milpitas General Land Use Plan to create an Urban Growth Boundary near the base of the Milpitas foothills, effective for twenty years, that would limit development with the city to the valley floor on the base of the foothills by prohibiting the City from providing city services such as police, fire, sewer and water to new land use developments in the hillside area?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Clara_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Clara County Elections", "url": "https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10841, "fingerprint": "1998|199800228|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800228|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "fd5cf821b8d456b2", "measure_id": "199800228", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to modernize our current schools, construct new facilities to relieve overcrowding, and improve technology for our students, shall the Pajaro Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $75,000,000 principal amount of bonds for acquisition and improvement of real property for school purposes, allocated as $31,700,000 to the Aptos area, $43,300,000 to the Watsonville Area, with each Area contributing $11,500,000 to costs of a new high school, said bonds bearing interest at rates within the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 11253, "no_votes": 7207, "total_votes": 18460, "percent_yes": 60.95882990249187, "percent_no": 39.04117009750813, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.919943", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.186152", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to modernize our current schools, construct new facilities to relieve overcrowding, and improve technology for our students, shall the Pajaro Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $75,000,000 principal amount of bonds for acquisition and improvement of real property for school purposes, allocated as $31,700,000 to the Aptos area, $43,300,000 to the Watsonville Area, with each Area contributing $11,500,000 to costs of a new high school, said bonds bearing interest at rates within the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12287, "fingerprint": "1998|199800227|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800227|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "c5d8d8c00625f51a", "measure_id": "199800227", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To improve health and safety conditions of Los Gatos and Saratoga High Schools; replace inadequate or unsafe electrical systems; repair deteriorated roofs, plumbing and sewer systems; reduce dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades; upgrade classrooms and restrooms; acquire, construct, repair and modernize school facilities; relieve overcrowding and comply with health and safety codes, shall the Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School District issue $79 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1165, "no_votes": 359, "total_votes": 1524, "percent_yes": 76.44356955380577, "percent_no": 23.556430446194227, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.515185", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.919660", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.185968", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve health and safety conditions of Los Gatos and Saratoga High Schools; replace inadequate or unsafe electrical systems; repair deteriorated roofs, plumbing and sewer systems; reduce dangers from earthquakes with seismic upgrades; upgrade classrooms and restrooms; acquire, construct, repair and modernize school facilities; relieve overcrowding and comply with health and safety codes, shall the Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School District issue $79 million of bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10837, "fingerprint": "1998|199800069|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800069|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "6bc1fd5d2174b39d", "measure_id": "199800069", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To enable the Lakeside Joint School District to improve the health and safety conditions of Lakeside School, including the renovation of heating, plumbing and electrical systems, and to expand existing facilities, including the construction of a multi-use room and additional classrooms, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $1,450,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum set by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 281, "no_votes": 58, "total_votes": 339, "percent_yes": 82.89085545722715, "percent_no": 17.109144542772853, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.917555", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.185243", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To enable the Lakeside Joint School District to improve the health and safety conditions of Lakeside School, including the renovation of heating, plumbing and electrical systems, and to expand existing facilities, including the construction of a multi-use room and additional classrooms, shall the District be authorized to issue bonds in the amount of not to exceed $1,450,000 with an interest rate not to exceed the maximum set by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10840, "fingerprint": "1998|199800226|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800226|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "4ca1a3f48da4aa3c", "measure_id": "199800226", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Cabrillo Community College District repair and rehabilitate its school facilities to meet current health, safety, accessibility, and instructional standards including aging roofs, inadequate lighting, deteriorated plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; refurbish classrooms, laboratories, restrooms, vocational training facilities, and construct and acquire other facilities and sites by issuing $85 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 45040, "no_votes": 15395, "total_votes": 60435, "percent_yes": 74.52635062463804, "percent_no": 25.47364937536196, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.919337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.185787", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Cabrillo Community College District repair and rehabilitate its school facilities to meet current health, safety, accessibility, and instructional standards including aging roofs, inadequate lighting, deteriorated plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; refurbish classrooms, laboratories, restrooms, vocational training facilities, and construct and acquire other facilities and sites by issuing $85 million in bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no proceeds used for administrator salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12289, "fingerprint": "1998|199800560|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800560|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "03ee0f431887699d", "measure_id": "199800560", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to construct new facilities to relieve student overcrowding, rehabilitate and repair current schools and improve technology for our students, shall the Pajaro Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $67,500,000 in bonds for the acquisition and improvement of real property for school purposes at interest rates within legal limits, allocated as $29,600,000 to the Aptos area, $37,900,000 to the Watsonville area, with each area contributing $10,500,000 to costs of a new high school?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 14166, "no_votes": 8625, "total_votes": 22791, "percent_yes": 62.15611425562722, "percent_no": 37.84388574437278, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.517352", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.921750", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.187281", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to construct new facilities to relieve student overcrowding, rehabilitate and repair current schools and improve technology for our students, shall the Pajaro Valley Unified School District be authorized to issue $67,500,000 in bonds for the acquisition and improvement of real property for school purposes at interest rates within legal limits, allocated as $29,600,000 to the Aptos area, $37,900,000 to the Watsonville area, with each area contributing $10,500,000 to costs of a new high school?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10838, "fingerprint": "1998|199800070|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800070|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "7fdce2d651d4fd52", "measure_id": "199800070", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To rehabilitate elementary schools, including replacing inadequate electrical, plumbing and heating systems; complying with fire, earthquake, health, safety and accessibility standards; renovating, constructing, and modernizing classrooms, restrooms and other school facility improvements (not for administrator salaries), with expenditures monitored by a community oversight committee, shall the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $28 million, at an interest rate within legal limits, with all proceeds spent to benefit local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7612, "no_votes": 1995, "total_votes": 9607, "percent_yes": 79.2338919537837, "percent_no": 20.766108046216303, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.918320", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.185423", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To rehabilitate elementary schools, including replacing inadequate electrical, plumbing and heating systems; complying with fire, earthquake, health, safety and accessibility standards; renovating, constructing, and modernizing classrooms, restrooms and other school facility improvements (not for administrator salaries), with expenditures monitored by a community oversight committee, shall the Santa Cruz City Elementary School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $28 million, at an interest rate within legal limits, with all proceeds spent to benefit local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10842, "fingerprint": "1998|199800488|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800488|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "4b017747e86faee3", "measure_id": "199800488", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz be amended by amending Section 603 of Article VI to establish the salary of City Councilmembers at $1,000.00 per month and the salary of the Mayor at $2,000.00 per month, the text of which is set forth in Resolution No. NS-23.763 adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz on Tuesday May 12, 1998, and on file in the office of the City Clerk?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12456, "no_votes": 6752, "total_votes": 19208, "percent_yes": 64.84798000832987, "percent_no": 35.15201999167013, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.920218", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.186332", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz be amended by amending Section 603 of Article VI to establish the salary of City Councilmembers at $1,000.00 per month and the salary of the Mayor at $2,000.00 per month, the text of which is set forth in Resolution No. NS-23.763 adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Cruz on Tuesday May 12, 1998, and on file in the office of the City Clerk?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10843, "fingerprint": "1998|199800489|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800489|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "3952f4d696b854af", "measure_id": "199800489", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To improve residents\u2019 safety and quality of life, shall the City of Santa Cruz issue seven million dollars ($7,000,000) in general obligation bonds to: Repair, improve, and seismically upgrade the City\u2019s three antiquated fire stations; purchase the 246-acre Bombay greenbelt property for permanent preservation as open space; develop a community park with a sports field and children's playground in the South of Laurel area; construct a fire administration building to replace the one destroyed by the Loma Prieta earthquake, if sufficient funds are available?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 15657, "no_votes": 4914, "total_votes": 20571, "percent_yes": 76.11200233338195, "percent_no": 23.88799766661805, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.920504", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.186517", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To improve residents\u2019 safety and quality of life, shall the City of Santa Cruz issue seven million dollars ($7,000,000) in general obligation bonds to: Repair, improve, and seismically upgrade the City\u2019s three antiquated fire stations; purchase the 246-acre Bombay greenbelt property for permanent preservation as open space; develop a community park with a sports field and children's playground in the South of Laurel area; construct a fire administration building to replace the one destroyed by the Loma Prieta earthquake, if sufficient funds are available?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12288, "fingerprint": "1998|199800490|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800490|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "ffb2bc4bdebe5b0d", "measure_id": "199800490", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz be amended by repealing Charter Section 1110 of Article XI? This Section currently limits the City to selecting from the five highest ranked candidates in making appointments to all City positions of employment.  Repeal of this Section will enable the City to develop policies and procedures for selecting applicants from a greater number of qualified candidates.  The full text of said Amendment is on file in the City Clerk\u2019s Department.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12251, "no_votes": 6091, "total_votes": 18342, "percent_yes": 66.7920619343583, "percent_no": 33.2079380656417, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.516475", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.920782", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.186719", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz be amended by repealing Charter Section 1110 of Article XI? This Section currently limits the City to selecting from the five highest ranked candidates in making appointments to all City positions of employment.  Repeal of this Section will enable the City to develop policies and procedures for selecting applicants from a greater number of qualified candidates.  The full text of said Amendment is on file in the City Clerk\u2019s Department.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10839, "fingerprint": "1998|199800071|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800071|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "00bfcce2428240e8", "measure_id": "199800071", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To rehabilitate junior and senior high schools, including replacing inadequate electrical, plumbing and heating systems; complying with fire, earthquake, health, safety and accessibility standards; renovating, constructing, and modernizing classrooms, restrooms and other school facility improvements (not for administrator salaries), with expenditures monitored by a community oversight committee, shall the Santa Cruz City High School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $58 million, at an interest rate within legal limits, with all proceeds spent to benefit local children?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12672, "no_votes": 4318, "total_votes": 16990, "percent_yes": 74.58505002942908, "percent_no": 25.414949970570916, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.918857", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.185605", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To rehabilitate junior and senior high schools, including replacing inadequate electrical, plumbing and heating systems; complying with fire, earthquake, health, safety and accessibility standards; renovating, constructing, and modernizing classrooms, restrooms and other school facility improvements (not for administrator salaries), with expenditures monitored by a community oversight committee, shall the Santa Cruz City High School District issue bonds in an amount not to exceed $58 million, at an interest rate within legal limits, with all proceeds spent to benefit local children?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10844, "fingerprint": "1998|199800491|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800491|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "6244040a8e8d3279", "measure_id": "199800491", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Watsonville continue the existing Utility User?s Tax for Long Distance Telephone and Cellular Telephone Calls until December 31, 2002?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1770, "no_votes": 4010, "total_votes": 5780, "percent_yes": 30.622837370242213, "percent_no": 69.37716262975779, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.921144", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.186916", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Watsonville continue the existing Utility User?s Tax for Long Distance Telephone and Cellular Telephone Calls until December 31, 2002?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10845, "fingerprint": "1998|199800492|SANTA CRUZ|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800492|SANTA CRUZ", "content_hash": "20d35cb9d0b2c29c", "measure_id": "199800492", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Santa Cruz", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter of the City of Watsonville be amended by amending Article X to add Section 1007 thereof to provide for compulsory arbitration for fire department employee disputes?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3690, "no_votes": 1703, "total_votes": 5393, "percent_yes": 68.42202855553495, "percent_no": 31.57797144446505, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.921417", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.187097", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter of the City of Watsonville be amended by amending Article X to add Section 1007 thereof to provide for compulsory arbitration for fire department employee disputes?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Santa_Cruz_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Santa Cruz County Elections", "url": "https://www.votescount.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10848, "fingerprint": "1998|199800561|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800561|SHASTA", "content_hash": "d1abbd5959ae09c5", "measure_id": "199800561", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall KAREN SUE TAYLOR be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Bella Vista School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 609, "no_votes": 489, "total_votes": 1098, "percent_yes": 55.46448087431693, "percent_no": 44.53551912568307, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.922891", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.187832", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall KAREN SUE TAYLOR be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Bella Vista School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10849, "fingerprint": "1998|199800562|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800562|SHASTA", "content_hash": "efc8f3918389480b", "measure_id": "199800562", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall ANN M. MURPHY be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Bella Vista School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 602, "no_votes": 472, "total_votes": 1074, "percent_yes": 56.052141527001865, "percent_no": 43.947858472998135, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.923188", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.188010", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ANN M. MURPHY be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Bella Vista School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10850, "fingerprint": "1998|199800563|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800563|SHASTA", "content_hash": "8ab22dd65d163d41", "measure_id": "199800563", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall ED MURPHY be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Bella Vista School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 604, "no_votes": 460, "total_votes": 1064, "percent_yes": 56.766917293233085, "percent_no": 43.233082706766915, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.923479", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.188187", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall ED MURPHY be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member of the Bella Vista School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12290, "fingerprint": "1998|199800564|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800564|SHASTA", "content_hash": "1bad2fbaec6a1828", "measure_id": "199800564", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace rented, temporary classrooms with permanent classrooms, renovate, acquire or construct additional classrooms and school facilities, provide libraries/information centers at all schools, repair deteriorating roofs, upgrade plumbing, heating cooling and electrical systems, acquire land, with no funds to be used for teacher or administrative salaries shall the Gateway Unified Schoold District issue $27.5 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4320, "no_votes": 3178, "total_votes": 7498, "percent_yes": 57.61536409709256, "percent_no": 42.38463590290744, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.518968", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.923796", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.188369", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace rented, temporary classrooms with permanent classrooms, renovate, acquire or construct additional classrooms and school facilities, provide libraries/information centers at all schools, repair deteriorating roofs, upgrade plumbing, heating cooling and electrical systems, acquire land, with no funds to be used for teacher or administrative salaries shall the Gateway Unified Schoold District issue $27.5 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10847, "fingerprint": "1998|199800073|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800073|SHASTA", "content_hash": "1bad2fbaec6a1828", "measure_id": "199800073", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To replace rented, temporary classrooms with permanent classrooms, renovate, acquire or construct additional classrooms and school facilities, provide libraries/information centers at all schools, repair deteriorating roofs, upgrade plumbing, heating cooling and electrical systems, acquire land, with no funds to be used for teacher or administrative salaries shall the Gateway Unified Schoold District issue $27.5 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2277, "no_votes": 1872, "total_votes": 4149, "percent_yes": 54.88069414316704, "percent_no": 45.11930585683296, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.922584", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.187650", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To replace rented, temporary classrooms with permanent classrooms, renovate, acquire or construct additional classrooms and school facilities, provide libraries/information centers at all schools, repair deteriorating roofs, upgrade plumbing, heating cooling and electrical systems, acquire land, with no funds to be used for teacher or administrative salaries shall the Gateway Unified Schoold District issue $27.5 million of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10846, "fingerprint": "1998|199800072|SHASTA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800072|SHASTA", "content_hash": "0f67b1c465a26e6e", "measure_id": "199800072", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Shasta", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For reducing class size and providing students throughout the District access to classroom computer technology and making the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Enterprise School District be autorized to finance the construction of new classrooms and the rehabilitation and modernization of neighborhood District schools by issuing bonds in the maximum amount of $19,000,000 with interest rates not to exceed the limits set by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2211, "no_votes": 1420, "total_votes": 3631, "percent_yes": 60.89231616634536, "percent_no": 39.10768383365464, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.922123", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.187467", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For reducing class size and providing students throughout the District access to classroom computer technology and making the District eligible to receive state matching funds, shall the Enterprise School District be autorized to finance the construction of new classrooms and the rehabilitation and modernization of neighborhood District schools by issuing bonds in the maximum amount of $19,000,000 with interest rates not to exceed the limits set by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Shasta_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Shasta County Elections", "url": "https://www.elections.co.shasta.ca.us", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10851, "fingerprint": "1998|199800493|SIERRA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800493|SIERRA", "content_hash": "34940861a2ae52fe", "measure_id": "199800493", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sierra", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Loyalton levy a Transient Occupancy Tax of up to ten percent on persons who stay in hotel or motel, or other short-term rental units for less than thirty days?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 108, "no_votes": 235, "total_votes": 343, "percent_yes": 31.4868804664723, "percent_no": 68.5131195335277, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.924068", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.188552", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Loyalton levy a Transient Occupancy Tax of up to ten percent on persons who stay in hotel or motel, or other short-term rental units for less than thirty days?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sierra_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10852, "fingerprint": "1998|199800014|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800014|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "4d55e06fa279110f", "measure_id": "199800014", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Karol Purcell be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 158, "no_votes": 92, "total_votes": 250, "percent_yes": 63.2, "percent_no": 36.8, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-03-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.924337", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.188733", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Karol Purcell be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10853, "fingerprint": "1998|199800015|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800015|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "aedd8a6b57139ed2", "measure_id": "199800015", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Ken McCutcheon be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 148, "no_votes": 97, "total_votes": 245, "percent_yes": 60.40816326530612, "percent_no": 39.59183673469388, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-03-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.924602", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.188912", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ken McCutcheon be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10854, "fingerprint": "1998|199800016|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800016|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "f245c34e42fdd606", "measure_id": "199800016", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Linn Mills be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 149, "no_votes": 96, "total_votes": 245, "percent_yes": 60.81632653061224, "percent_no": 39.18367346938776, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-03-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.924867", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.189102", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Linn Mills be recalled (removed) from the office of Member, City Council?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12291, "fingerprint": "1998|199800177|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800177|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "19c7e9e6f4349198", "measure_id": "199800177", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Should the City of Dunsmuir provide law enforcement services by operating its own police Department, instead of contracting with the Siskiyou County Sheriff\u2019s Department?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 211, "no_votes": 324, "total_votes": 535, "percent_yes": 39.4392523364486, "percent_no": 60.5607476635514, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.520915", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.925797", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.189658", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the City of Dunsmuir provide law enforcement services by operating its own police Department, instead of contracting with the Siskiyou County Sheriff\u2019s Department?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10855, "fingerprint": "1998|199800175|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800175|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "97521ef58ce6619b", "measure_id": "199800175", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 101, "no_votes": 169, "total_votes": 270, "percent_yes": 37.4074074074074, "percent_no": 62.5925925925926, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.925199", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.189286", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10856, "fingerprint": "1998|199800176|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800176|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "0f6356d7580fba1b", "measure_id": "199800176", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 102, "no_votes": 164, "total_votes": 266, "percent_yes": 38.345864661654126, "percent_no": 61.654135338345874, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.925522", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.189467", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10857, "fingerprint": "1998|199800178|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800178|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "a0b4a9582d9b48ff", "measure_id": "199800178", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an initiative ordinance requiring voter approval at a regular election of any ordinance or regulation relating to trees, landscaping, lighting and noise that may effect residential property be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 609, "no_votes": 511, "total_votes": 1120, "percent_yes": 54.37499999999999, "percent_no": 45.62500000000001, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Initiative", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.926074", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.189852", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an initiative ordinance requiring voter approval at a regular election of any ordinance or regulation relating to trees, landscaping, lighting and noise that may effect residential property be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Initiative", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10858, "fingerprint": "1998|199800179|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800179|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "97521ef58ce6619b", "measure_id": "199800179", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 71, "no_votes": 168, "total_votes": 239, "percent_yes": 29.707112970711293, "percent_no": 70.2928870292887, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.926379", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.190035", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10859, "fingerprint": "1998|199800180|SISKIYOU|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800180|SISKIYOU", "content_hash": "0f6356d7580fba1b", "measure_id": "199800180", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Siskiyou", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 72, "no_votes": 165, "total_votes": 237, "percent_yes": 30.37974683544304, "percent_no": 69.62025316455696, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.926647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.190217", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Siskiyou_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10861, "fingerprint": "1998|199800137|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800137|SOLANO", "content_hash": "99499c596e178a0a", "measure_id": "199800137", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance NO. 1551 of Solano County be approved to provide needed funding to maintain local public libraries, to restore operating hours in the evenings, weekdays and weekends, to purchase books and materials, to improve educational services for children, students, adults and seniors and to restore children\u2019s and young adults\u2019 programs and services, by raising the local sales tax one-eighth of one cent for a maximum period of 16 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 47712, "no_votes": 22329, "total_votes": 70041, "percent_yes": 68.12010108365101, "percent_no": 31.879898916348992, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.927288", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.190580", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance NO. 1551 of Solano County be approved to provide needed funding to maintain local public libraries, to restore operating hours in the evenings, weekdays and weekends, to purchase books and materials, to improve educational services for children, students, adults and seniors and to restore children\u2019s and young adults\u2019 programs and services, by raising the local sales tax one-eighth of one cent for a maximum period of 16 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10860, "fingerprint": "1998|199800074|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800074|SOLANO", "content_hash": "911051a092e22130", "measure_id": "199800074", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District be authorized to finance the design, acquisition, construction and equipping of a third high school in the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District and the repair, improvement, equipping and renovation of the Armijo and Fairfield High Schools by incurring bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $49,000,000, with interest at a rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 8285, "no_votes": 4725, "total_votes": 13010, "percent_yes": 63.68178324365873, "percent_no": 36.31821675634127, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.926916", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.190399", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 of the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District be authorized to finance the design, acquisition, construction and equipping of a third high school in the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District and the repair, improvement, equipping and renovation of the Armijo and Fairfield High Schools by incurring bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $49,000,000, with interest at a rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10863, "fingerprint": "1998|199800494|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800494|SOLANO", "content_hash": "b2f276aa66f61341", "measure_id": "199800494", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2995, "no_votes": 5639, "total_votes": 8634, "percent_yes": 34.68844104702339, "percent_no": 65.31155895297661, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.927890", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.190976", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Clerk be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10864, "fingerprint": "1998|199800495|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800495|SOLANO", "content_hash": "d5dbb0a9aa3f995f", "measure_id": "199800495", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2700, "no_votes": 5943, "total_votes": 8643, "percent_yes": 31.23915307185005, "percent_no": 68.76084692814995, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.928196", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.191160", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the office of City Treasurer be appointive?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10862, "fingerprint": "1998|199800294|SOLANO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800294|SOLANO", "content_hash": "8acad22ed4abe0ce", "measure_id": "199800294", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Solano", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should any new voter approved taxes or revenues allocated for the following transportation projects be used in accordance with the County\u2019s transportation plan? Improve Road Safety, fix streets and potholes, rail service to BART, expand Ferry Commute Service, synchronize traffic signals, increase commuter buses, build I-80 reliever route, upgrade local roads and interchanges, improve transit-seniors and disabled, expand bicycle routes, limit administrative expenses to 0.05%, an appointed Citizens Oversight Committee.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 66856, "no_votes": 20487, "total_votes": 87343, "percent_yes": 76.54419930618367, "percent_no": 23.45580069381633, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.927575", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.190778", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should any new voter approved taxes or revenues allocated for the following transportation projects be used in accordance with the County\u2019s transportation plan? Improve Road Safety, fix streets and potholes, rail service to BART, expand Ferry Commute Service, synchronize traffic signals, increase commuter buses, build I-80 reliever route, upgrade local roads and interchanges, improve transit-seniors and disabled, expand bicycle routes, limit administrative expenses to 0.05%, an appointed Citizens Oversight Committee.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Solano_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Solano County Elections", "url": "https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rov", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10865, "fingerprint": "1998|199800001|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800001|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0506b1555b8c2c67", "measure_id": "199800001", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Debora Fudge be recalled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2020, "no_votes": 2900, "total_votes": 4920, "percent_yes": 41.05691056910569, "percent_no": 58.94308943089431, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-01-06", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.928527", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.191343", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Debora Fudge be recalled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10866, "fingerprint": "1998|199800002|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800002|SONOMA", "content_hash": "2b67d38e5769c956", "measure_id": "199800002", "measure_letter": "2", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Lynn Morehouse be recalled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2016, "no_votes": 2900, "total_votes": 4916, "percent_yes": 41.00895036615134, "percent_no": 58.99104963384866, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-01-06", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.928828", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.191533", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Lynn Morehouse be recalled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10867, "fingerprint": "1998|199800003|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800003|SONOMA", "content_hash": "4c86fdaf7df6a022", "measure_id": "199800003", "measure_letter": "3", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Sam Salmon be recalled?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2125, "no_votes": 2787, "total_votes": 4912, "percent_yes": 43.2614006514658, "percent_no": 56.7385993485342, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-01-06", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.929095", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.191724", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Sam Salmon be recalled?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12296, "fingerprint": "1998|199800565|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800565|SONOMA", "content_hash": "40806c2fc688dffa", "measure_id": "199800565", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For increasing the number of members of the governing board of the Santa Rosa City Elementary and High School Districts from five to seven.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 30478, "no_votes": 24110, "total_votes": 54588, "percent_yes": 55.832783761998975, "percent_no": 44.167216238001025, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.527469", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.933063", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.194338", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For increasing the number of members of the governing board of the Santa Rosa City Elementary and High School Districts from five to seven.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12293, "fingerprint": "1998|199800181|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800181|SONOMA", "content_hash": "c54dd6e147e76ff5", "measure_id": "199800181", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a Resolution be adopted to amend the General Plan of the City of Rohnert Park by repealing the 4 Year Urban Boundary Policy and establishing a 20 Year Urban Growth Boundary?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2732, "no_votes": 5704, "total_votes": 8436, "percent_yes": 32.38501659554291, "percent_no": 67.61498340445709, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.524945", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.930531", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.192682", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a Resolution be adopted to amend the General Plan of the City of Rohnert Park by repealing the 4 Year Urban Boundary Policy and establishing a 20 Year Urban Growth Boundary?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12292, "fingerprint": "1998|199800076|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800076|SONOMA", "content_hash": "bf1910163926a9ca", "measure_id": "199800076", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide funds for computer technology, textbooks, science equipment, and other instructional materials and programs for the schools in the District, shall the West Sonoma County Union High School district continue to impose a qualified special tax in the amount not to exceed $12. 08 per parcel, such tax to continue for a period of seven years beginning July 1, 1998 and correspondingly increase the District\u2019s appropriations limit for the maximum time allowed by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6309, "no_votes": 2340, "total_votes": 8649, "percent_yes": 72.94484911550468, "percent_no": 27.05515088449532, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.524680", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.930237", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.192483", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide funds for computer technology, textbooks, science equipment, and other instructional materials and programs for the schools in the District, shall the West Sonoma County Union High School district continue to impose a qualified special tax in the amount not to exceed $12. 08 per parcel, such tax to continue for a period of seven years beginning July 1, 1998 and correspondingly increase the District\u2019s appropriations limit for the maximum time allowed by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10868, "fingerprint": "1998|199800004|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800004|SONOMA", "content_hash": "93caf4ff152dafa2", "measure_id": "199800004", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall  a resolution be adopted to amend the Town of Windsor General Plan by establishing a 20 year Urban Growth Boundary?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3542, "no_votes": 1352, "total_votes": 4894, "percent_yes": 72.37433592153657, "percent_no": 27.62566407846343, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-01-06", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.929358", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.191933", "update_count": 5, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall  a resolution be adopted to amend the Town of Windsor General Plan by establishing a 20 year Urban Growth Boundary?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12294, "fingerprint": "1998|199800295|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800295|SONOMA", "content_hash": "cd224126043b8394", "measure_id": "199800295", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "This measure does not increase taxes. Should new voter-approved sales tax contribute funding for the following transportation projects within the next 20 years; Widen/improve Highway 101 from Windsor to south-county line; implement passenger rail service between Sonoma/Marin Counties; fix streets/roads/potholes; upgrade Highway 116 in east/central county; expand bus service including rail linkage; improve senior/disabled transit; expand bicycle/pedestrian routes; and limit administrative expenses to 1%?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 104129, "no_votes": 39763, "total_votes": 143892, "percent_yes": 72.36608011564229, "percent_no": 27.63391988435771, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.525208", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.930799", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.192865", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "This measure does not increase taxes. Should new voter-approved sales tax contribute funding for the following transportation projects within the next 20 years; Widen/improve Highway 101 from Windsor to south-county line; implement passenger rail service between Sonoma/Marin Counties; fix streets/roads/potholes; upgrade Highway 116 in east/central county; expand bus service including rail linkage; improve senior/disabled transit; expand bicycle/pedestrian routes; and limit administrative expenses to 1%?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10870, "fingerprint": "1998|199800075|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800075|SONOMA", "content_hash": "2739a2bf1af92c22", "measure_id": "199800075", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To maintain classroom educational programs and services such as art and music classes, classroom computer technology, libraries and student counseling, shall the Sebastopol Union School District continue to impose a qualified special tax in the amount not to exceed $26.91 per parcel, such tax to continue for a period of seven years beginning July 1, 1998, and correspondingly increase the District?s respective appropriations limit for the maximum time allowed by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1928, "no_votes": 599, "total_votes": 2527, "percent_yes": 76.29600316580925, "percent_no": 23.703996834190747, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.929925", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.192300", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To maintain classroom educational programs and services such as art and music classes, classroom computer technology, libraries and student counseling, shall the Sebastopol Union School District continue to impose a qualified special tax in the amount not to exceed $26.91 per parcel, such tax to continue for a period of seven years beginning July 1, 1998, and correspondingly increase the District?s respective appropriations limit for the maximum time allowed by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 12295, "fingerprint": "1998|199800296|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800296|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0e2ec007f6467b43", "measure_id": "199800296", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a 1/2 cent sales tax for general county purposes, with the following mandatory restrictions; the sales tax must expire after 20 years; an independent audit will be conducted  to review all sales tax expenditures; an annual sales tax expenditure report by the County Auditor shall be made available for public inspection?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68062, "no_votes": 75051, "total_votes": 143113, "percent_yes": 47.558223222209016, "percent_no": 52.441776777790984, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.525473", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.931077", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.193051", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Supervisors enact a 1/2 cent sales tax for general county purposes, with the following mandatory restrictions; the sales tax must expire after 20 years; an independent audit will be conducted  to review all sales tax expenditures; an annual sales tax expenditure report by the County Auditor shall be made available for public inspection?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10869, "fingerprint": "1998|199800026|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800026|SONOMA", "content_hash": "debb93f3a7ac9b51", "measure_id": "199800026", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In order to maintain essential City services, shall the City of Santa Rosa continue to impose the utility users tax on cellular, facsimile, pager, and out-of-state and international telecommunications and other services, as added by Ordinance No. 3211, approved by the City Council in August 1995?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6575, "no_votes": 6973, "total_votes": 13548, "percent_yes": 48.53114850900502, "percent_no": 51.46885149099498, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.929622", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.192118", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to maintain essential City services, shall the City of Santa Rosa continue to impose the utility users tax on cellular, facsimile, pager, and out-of-state and international telecommunications and other services, as added by Ordinance No. 3211, approved by the City Council in August 1995?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10871, "fingerprint": "1998|199800297|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800297|SONOMA", "content_hash": "29743a6c698b79ed", "measure_id": "199800297", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the people of Sonoma County enact an ordinance requiring voter approval of any amendment to the County General Plan that increases the density or intensity of land uses allowed in the Petaluma/Novato Community Separator during the next 20 years?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 106396, "no_votes": 32277, "total_votes": 138673, "percent_yes": 76.7243803768578, "percent_no": 23.275619623142205, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.931343", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.193231", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the people of Sonoma County enact an ordinance requiring voter approval of any amendment to the County General Plan that increases the density or intensity of land uses allowed in the Petaluma/Novato Community Separator during the next 20 years?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10872, "fingerprint": "1998|199800496|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800496|SONOMA", "content_hash": "ab48e3aa2c33b0dd", "measure_id": "199800496", "measure_letter": "E", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance amending the General Plan of the City of Cotati to approve a 20 year Urban Growth Boundary be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1507, "no_votes": 594, "total_votes": 2101, "percent_yes": 71.72774869109948, "percent_no": 28.272251308900522, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.931609", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.193412", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance amending the General Plan of the City of Cotati to approve a 20 year Urban Growth Boundary be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10873, "fingerprint": "1998|199800497|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800497|SONOMA", "content_hash": "f3857cc9c2d991be", "measure_id": "199800497", "measure_letter": "F", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Cotati\u2019s Rent Control Ordinance (Cotati Municipal Code 19.12.010. to 19.12.130) be repealed?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1258, "no_votes": 903, "total_votes": 2161, "percent_yes": 58.21378991207774, "percent_no": 41.78621008792226, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.931931", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.193592", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Cotati\u2019s Rent Control Ordinance (Cotati Municipal Code 19.12.010. to 19.12.130) be repealed?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10874, "fingerprint": "1998|199800498|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800498|SONOMA", "content_hash": "5ba4a9c45210f31a", "measure_id": "199800498", "measure_letter": "G", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax from 8% to 10% be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1094, "no_votes": 970, "total_votes": 2064, "percent_yes": 53.003875968992254, "percent_no": 46.996124031007746, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.932230", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.193776", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax from 8% to 10% be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10875, "fingerprint": "1998|199800499|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800499|SONOMA", "content_hash": "0620f812a0f2b7a9", "measure_id": "199800499", "measure_letter": "H", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Compensation for Councilmembers and Mayor. Shall there be an amendment to Petaluma City Charter Section 19 to become effective immediately and read: \u201cCompensation. The Council members shall each receive compensation of $500 a month (currently $5 a meeting with a maximum of $20 a month). The mayor shall receive compensation of $750 a month (currently $10 a meeting with a maximum of $40 a month)\u201d?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7676, "no_votes": 9203, "total_votes": 16879, "percent_yes": 45.47662776230819, "percent_no": 54.52337223769181, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.932524", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.193966", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Compensation for Councilmembers and Mayor. Shall there be an amendment to Petaluma City Charter Section 19 to become effective immediately and read: \u201cCompensation. The Council members shall each receive compensation of $500 a month (currently $5 a meeting with a maximum of $20 a month). The mayor shall receive compensation of $750 a month (currently $10 a meeting with a maximum of $40 a month)\u201d?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10876, "fingerprint": "1998|199800500|SONOMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800500|SONOMA", "content_hash": "b1d11361c53e724a", "measure_id": "199800500", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sonoma", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall a measure be adopted that amends the City of Petaluma General Plan to establish an Urban Growth Boundary that would limit urban development and the provision of City water and sewer services beyond the Urban Growth Boundary and require voter approval for amendments to the Urban Growth Boundary until December 31, 2018?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13531, "no_votes": 3459, "total_votes": 16990, "percent_yes": 79.6409652736904, "percent_no": 20.359034726309602, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.932792", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.194157", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall a measure be adopted that amends the City of Petaluma General Plan to establish an Urban Growth Boundary that would limit urban development and the provision of City water and sewer services beyond the Urban Growth Boundary and require voter approval for amendments to the Urban Growth Boundary until December 31, 2018?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sonoma_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Sonoma County Elections", "url": "https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/administrative-support-and-fiscal-services/clerk-recorder-assessor-registrar-of-voters/registrar-of-voters", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10877, "fingerprint": "1998|199800501|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800501|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "03a42556117328d9", "measure_id": "199800501", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall Section 1206 be added to the Modesto City Charter to transfer authority to resolve public safety union contract disputes from the City Council to an outside arbitration panel.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 24777, "no_votes": 16866, "total_votes": 41643, "percent_yes": 59.498595202074775, "percent_no": 40.501404797925225, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.933336", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.194519", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Section 1206 be added to the Modesto City Charter to transfer authority to resolve public safety union contract disputes from the City Council to an outside arbitration panel.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10878, "fingerprint": "1998|199800502|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800502|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "3226025e16b52675", "measure_id": "199800502", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "In the event the Modesto City Charter is amended to transfer authority to resolve public safety union contract disputes from the City Council to an outside arbitration panel, shall the Charter also be amended to require voter approval of any decisions made by such an outside arbitration panel?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17664, "no_votes": 23799, "total_votes": 41463, "percent_yes": 42.60183778308371, "percent_no": 57.39816221691629, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.933648", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.194704", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In the event the Modesto City Charter is amended to transfer authority to resolve public safety union contract disputes from the City Council to an outside arbitration panel, shall the Charter also be amended to require voter approval of any decisions made by such an outside arbitration panel?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10879, "fingerprint": "1998|199800503|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800503|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "bb9c2d8b915890cc", "measure_id": "199800503", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following described area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan? The proposed Bent Creek Estates Subdivision, consisting of 22.6 acres, provided the area is first annexed to the city. This area is a parcel east of the Santa Fe Railroad Tracks, south of Parker Road and north of Dry Creek.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 22402, "no_votes": 17819, "total_votes": 40221, "percent_yes": 55.69727256905597, "percent_no": 44.30272743094403, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.933950", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.194892", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City Council provide sewer service to the following described area of the Modesto Urban Area General Plan? The proposed Bent Creek Estates Subdivision, consisting of 22.6 acres, provided the area is first annexed to the city. This area is a parcel east of the Santa Fe Railroad Tracks, south of Parker Road and north of Dry Creek.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10880, "fingerprint": "1998|199800566|STANISLAUS|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800566|STANISLAUS", "content_hash": "49ef6815e4bcad1d", "measure_id": "199800566", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Stanislaus", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Board of Trustees of the Empire Union School District be authorized, through its Community Facilities District 1987-1, which was formed and approved by the voters in 1987, to finance the amended list of school facilities (the \u201cProject\u201d, as set forth in Resolution #109-022198), with no change in the special tax previously authorized.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 3997, "no_votes": 1498, "total_votes": 5495, "percent_yes": 72.73885350318471, "percent_no": 27.261146496815286, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Authorize Expenditure", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.934287", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.195073", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Board of Trustees of the Empire Union School District be authorized, through its Community Facilities District 1987-1, which was formed and approved by the voters in 1987, to finance the amended list of school facilities (the \u201cProject\u201d, as set forth in Resolution #109-022198), with no change in the special tax previously authorized.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Stanislaus_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Stanislaus County Elections", "url": "https://www.stanvote.com", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10881, "fingerprint": "1998|199800077|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800077|SUTTER", "content_hash": "087266f692daeb82", "measure_id": "199800077", "measure_letter": "GG", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Live Oak Unified School District issue bonds in the amount of $6.88 million at an interest rate within the legal limit, for the purposes of adding classroom space, acquiring a site and construct a new high school, reconstructing and refurbishing existing school facilities including Luther School, Encinal School, Live Oak Alternative Schools and converting the middle school to elementary grades and the high school to a modern middle school?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 517, "no_votes": 554, "total_votes": 1071, "percent_yes": 48.27264239028945, "percent_no": 51.72735760971055, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.934606", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.195265", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Live Oak Unified School District issue bonds in the amount of $6.88 million at an interest rate within the legal limit, for the purposes of adding classroom space, acquiring a site and construct a new high school, reconstructing and refurbishing existing school facilities including Luther School, Encinal School, Live Oak Alternative Schools and converting the middle school to elementary grades and the high school to a modern middle school?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10883, "fingerprint": "1998|199800229|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800229|SUTTER", "content_hash": "06d073c96075b987", "measure_id": "199800229", "measure_letter": "HH", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Brittan Elementary School District incur bonded indebtedness of not to exceed two million one hundred thousand dollars ($2,100,000.00), the rate of interest thereon not to exceed the maximum rate allowable by law, to construct a new campus?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 510, "no_votes": 453, "total_votes": 963, "percent_yes": 52.95950155763239, "percent_no": 47.04049844236761, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.935151", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.195635", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Brittan Elementary School District incur bonded indebtedness of not to exceed two million one hundred thousand dollars ($2,100,000.00), the rate of interest thereon not to exceed the maximum rate allowable by law, to construct a new campus?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10882, "fingerprint": "1998|199800138|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800138|SUTTER", "content_hash": "13dbb0b6ab99aa3d", "measure_id": "199800138", "measure_letter": "II", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should Ordinance No. 1 of the Sutter County Flood Protection Authority imposing a countywide sales tax of one-half (1/2) percent, for not to exceed 30 years, to provide countywide flood protection be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12074, "no_votes": 6446, "total_votes": 18520, "percent_yes": 65.19438444924405, "percent_no": 34.805615550755945, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.934881", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.195451", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Ordinance No. 1 of the Sutter County Flood Protection Authority imposing a countywide sales tax of one-half (1/2) percent, for not to exceed 30 years, to provide countywide flood protection be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10884, "fingerprint": "1998|199800298|SUTTER|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800298|SUTTER", "content_hash": "841808d436e7bb35", "measure_id": "199800298", "measure_letter": "JJ", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Sutter", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall approval be given to an ordinance of the Sutter County Flood Protection Authority imposing a 1/2% sales tax for 30 years or until the Authority receives $153,000,000? The ordinance requires that the tax revenues be used only for specified flood-protection projects and restricts use for administration. It also requires that an annual audit be available to the public and that the Grand Jury be asked to report annually on how revenues are used.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13546, "no_votes": 7940, "total_votes": 21486, "percent_yes": 63.0457041794657, "percent_no": 36.9542958205343, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.935420", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.195828", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall approval be given to an ordinance of the Sutter County Flood Protection Authority imposing a 1/2% sales tax for 30 years or until the Authority receives $153,000,000? The ordinance requires that the tax revenues be used only for specified flood-protection projects and restricts use for administration. It also requires that an annual audit be available to the public and that the Grand Jury be asked to report annually on how revenues are used.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Sutter_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1094, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1072|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1072|Statewide", "content_hash": "0b8a30cdbc791aef", "measure_id": "CA1072", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 221", "description": "Subordinate Judicial Officers. Discipline. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 81.0, "percent_no": 19.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a process for disciplining subordinate judicial offi...", "summary_text": "This measure established a process for disciplining subordinate judicial officers (such as commissioners and referees) in California courts. It created a system similar to the one used for disciplining judges, allowing for investigation and potential removal of these court officials for misconduct.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 221", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_221_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20221%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20221%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1093, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1071|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1071|Statewide", "content_hash": "8c663ee8ca7ace0e", "measure_id": "CA1071", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 222", "description": "Murder. Peace Officer Victim. Sentence. Credits.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 77.09999847, "percent_no": 22.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure requires defendants convicted of murdering a peace officer to se...", "summary_text": "This measure requires defendants convicted of murdering a peace officer to serve their full sentence without the possibility of earning credits for good behavior or participation in work or educational programs. It eliminates sentence reductions that were previously available to inmates convicted of killing law enforcement officers.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 222", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_222_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20222%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20222%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1092, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1070|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1070|Statewide", "content_hash": "83bf6c566ea44b87", "measure_id": "CA1070", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Transportation: Funding. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.40000153, "percent_no": 24.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment allows the state legislature to use existing ga...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment allows the state legislature to use existing gasoline sales tax revenue for transportation purposes rather than general government spending. It restricts the use of gas tax funds to transportation-related projects and programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1091, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1069|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1069|Statewide", "content_hash": "8aafdf62607cfcf3", "measure_id": "CA1069", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Property Taxes: Contaminated Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.69999695, "percent_no": 28.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows property tax assessments to be reduced for properties con...", "summary_text": "This measure allows property tax assessments to be reduced for properties contaminated by hazardous substances, with the reduction based on the diminished value caused by the contamination. The tax reduction would remain in effect until the contamination is cleaned up and the property value is restored.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1090, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1068|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1068|Statewide", "content_hash": "6973194a405329d7", "measure_id": "CA1068", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 219", "description": "Ballot Measures: Application. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.30000305, "percent_no": 32.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1998 California constitutional amendment established that ballot measure...", "summary_text": "This 1998 California constitutional amendment established that ballot measures would apply to future circumstances and situations that arise after their passage, not just those existing at the time of enactment. The measure clarified the temporal scope of citizen-initiated propositions and legislative constitutional amendments.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 219", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_219_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20219%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20219%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1089, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1067|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1067|Statewide", "content_hash": "3e799eb905b63846", "measure_id": "CA1067", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 220", "description": "Courts: Superior and Municipal Court Consolidation. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.5, "percent_no": 35.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment consolidated California's municipal and superio...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment consolidated California's municipal and superior courts into a single superior court system in each county. The measure eliminated the separate municipal court level and transferred all their jurisdiction to the superior courts.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 220", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_220_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20220%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20220%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1088, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1066|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1066|Statewide", "content_hash": "3c3f0dbd68def9d2", "measure_id": "CA1066", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1A", "description": "Class Size Reduction. Kindergarten-University. Public Education Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.5, "percent_no": 37.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund class size reduction...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund class size reduction programs and school facility improvements from kindergarten through university level. The bonds would provide funding for construction, renovation, and equipment purchases to support smaller class sizes in California's public education system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1A", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1A_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201A%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201A%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1087, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1065|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1065|Statewide", "content_hash": "d3648e13a9e475a9", "measure_id": "CA1065", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Tribal-State Gaming Compacts. Tribal Casinos. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.40000153, "percent_no": 37.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries | State-Tribal Relations\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative authorized federally recognized Native American tribes in Cal...", "summary_text": "This initiative authorized federally recognized Native American tribes in California to operate casino games including slot machines, lottery games, and banking and percentage card games on tribal lands through compacts negotiated with the state. The measure established the framework for regulating tribal gaming operations and required revenue-sharing agreements between tribes and the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1086, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1064|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1064|Statewide", "content_hash": "7d86dc16aff1e18b", "measure_id": "CA1064", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 227", "description": "English Language in Public Schools. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.90000153, "percent_no": 39.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1998 California ballot measure required that all public school instructi...", "summary_text": "This 1998 California ballot measure required that all public school instruction be conducted in English and replaced bilingual education programs with structured English immersion programs lasting no more than one year. The measure allowed parents to request waivers for their children to receive instruction in other languages under specific circumstances.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 227", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_227_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20227%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20227%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1085, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1063|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1063|Statewide", "content_hash": "1acd5debe61b267b", "measure_id": "CA1063", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Criminal Law. Prohibition on Slaughter of Horses and Sale of Horsemeat for Human Consumption. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.40000153, "percent_no": 40.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Business & Commerce | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure prohibited the slaughter of horses and the sale of horsemeat for...", "summary_text": "This measure prohibited the slaughter of horses and the sale of horsemeat for human consumption in California. It made violations a misdemeanor punishable by fine and/or imprisonment.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1084, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1062|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1062|Statewide", "content_hash": "b4147fcc99fcedb1", "measure_id": "CA1062", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Trapping Practices. Bans Use of Specified Traps and Animal Poisons. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.5, "percent_no": 42.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure banned the use of steel-jawed leghold traps, snares, and poison ...", "summary_text": "This measure banned the use of steel-jawed leghold traps, snares, and poison on mammals for recreational or commercial fur trapping in California. It also prohibited the sale of fur from animals trapped with these methods, while allowing exceptions for livestock protection, scientific research, and protection of human health and safety.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1083, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1061|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1061|Statewide", "content_hash": "90c1d8ce6967d251", "measure_id": "CA1061", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Local Sales and Use Taxes-Revenue Sharing. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.40000153, "percent_no": 46.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the state constitution to establish revenue sharing rule...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the state constitution to establish revenue sharing rules for local sales and use taxes, allowing local governments to retain a portion of sales tax revenue generated within their jurisdictions. It restructured how sales tax revenue is distributed between state and local governments in California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1082, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1060|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1060|Statewide", "content_hash": "77f80cb9196a8f88", "measure_id": "CA1060", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 225", "description": "Limiting Congressional Terms. Proposed U.S. Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.90000153, "percent_no": 47.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Federal Government | Term Limits\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure called for a U", "summary_text": "This ballot measure called for a U.S. Constitutional Amendment to limit the terms that members of Congress can serve. The measure passed with 52.9% of the vote, expressing California voters' support for congressional term limits at the federal level.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 225", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_225_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20225%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20225%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1081, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1059|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1059|Statewide", "content_hash": "07318a2e020cee44", "measure_id": "CA1059", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "State and County Early Childhood Development Programs. Additional Tobacco Surtax. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.59999847, "percent_no": 49.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Education: PreK-12 | Health | Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure imposed an additional 50-cent per pack tax on cigarettes and equ...", "summary_text": "This measure imposed an additional 50-cent per pack tax on cigarettes and equivalent taxes on other tobacco products to fund early childhood development programs for children ages 0-5. The revenue would support health, education, and childcare services administered by new county commissions and a state commission.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1080, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1058|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1058|Statewide", "content_hash": "48b2aa5f4c6d9428", "measure_id": "CA1058", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 226", "description": "Political Contributions by Employees, Union Members, Foreign Entities. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.59999847, "percent_no": 53.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited labor unions from using member dues for po...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited labor unions from using member dues for political contributions without individual written consent and banned political contributions by foreign entities, foreign-controlled corporations, and non-citizens.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 226", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_226_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20226%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20226%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1079, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1057|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1057|Statewide", "content_hash": "c7be4d64ceba401a", "measure_id": "CA1057", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Partisan Presidential Primary Elections.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.09999847, "percent_no": 53.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established partisan primary elections for presidenti...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established partisan primary elections for presidential candidates, where voters could only participate in their registered party's primary election. It would have replaced California's existing system that allowed broader voter participation in presidential primaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1078, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1056|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1056|Statewide", "content_hash": "611c64201cd2d8be", "measure_id": "CA1056", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 223", "description": "Schools. Spending Limits on Administration. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.5, "percent_no": 54.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1998 California initiative statute would have imposed spending limits on...", "summary_text": "This 1998 California initiative statute would have imposed spending limits on school district administrative costs. The measure failed with 45.5% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 223", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_223_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20223%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20223%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1077, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1055|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1055|Statewide", "content_hash": "472e4de191889331", "measure_id": "CA1055", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Air Quality Improvement. Tax Credits. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.59999847, "percent_no": 56.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have provided tax credits to individuals and businesses fo...", "summary_text": "This measure would have provided tax credits to individuals and businesses for purchasing electric vehicles, alternative fuel vehicles, and energy-efficient appliances to improve air quality. It would have been funded through unspecified revenue sources and administered through the state tax system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1076, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1054|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1054|Statewide", "content_hash": "d8e9ed2e87718492", "measure_id": "CA1054", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 224", "description": "State-Funded Design and Engineering Services. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.09999847, "percent_no": 61.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited the state of California from using private...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited the state of California from using private contractors for architectural, landscape architectural, engineering, and land surveying services, requiring these services to be performed only by state employees. The measure would have amended the state constitution to mandate that all design and engineering work for state projects be conducted in-house rather than outsourced to private firms.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 224", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_224_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20224%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20224%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1075, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1053|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1053|Statewide", "content_hash": "1667724913ad1d14", "measure_id": "CA1053", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Public Schools. Permanent Class Size Reduction. Parent-Teacher Council. Teacher Credentialing. Pupil Suspension for Drug Possession. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.79999924, "percent_no": 63.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1998 California ballot measure would have required permanent class size ...", "summary_text": "This 1998 California ballot measure would have required permanent class size reduction in public schools, established parent-teacher councils, modified teacher credentialing requirements, and mandated pupil suspension for drug possession. The initiative failed with 36.8% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1074, "fingerprint": "1998|CA1052|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|CA1052|Statewide", "content_hash": "cc3ba65029bb0443", "measure_id": "CA1052", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Electric Utilities. Assessments. Bonds. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 26.5, "percent_no": 73.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Energy & Electric Utilities\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required electric utilities to pay assessments to fun...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required electric utilities to pay assessments to fund the issuance of revenue bonds for public power projects and renewable energy development. The bonds would have been used to acquire private electric utility assets and infrastructure to create publicly-owned electric utilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1998)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1998/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201998", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201998", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 12297, "fingerprint": "1998|199800567|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800567|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "015cab1eb4409c8c", "measure_id": "199800567", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For decreasing the number of members of the governing board of Los Molinos Unified School District from seven to five?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 409, "no_votes": 665, "total_votes": 1074, "percent_yes": 38.08193668528864, "percent_no": 61.91806331471136, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.530173", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.936373", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.196389", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For decreasing the number of members of the governing board of Los Molinos Unified School District from seven to five?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10885, "fingerprint": "1998|199800078|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800078|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "709b62872f5018f8", "measure_id": "199800078", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To reduce classroom overcrowding; renovate schools and upgrade plumbing, heating, cooling and electrical systems; construct classrooms; and improve fire alarm and safety systems, shall the Corning Union Elementary School District authorize up to $2,880,000 of bonds with an interest rate within the legal limit to acquire, construct and renovate school facilities and grounds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1112, "no_votes": 933, "total_votes": 2045, "percent_yes": 54.37652811735941, "percent_no": 45.62347188264059, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.935690", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.196014", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To reduce classroom overcrowding; renovate schools and upgrade plumbing, heating, cooling and electrical systems; construct classrooms; and improve fire alarm and safety systems, shall the Corning Union Elementary School District authorize up to $2,880,000 of bonds with an interest rate within the legal limit to acquire, construct and renovate school facilities and grounds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 12298, "fingerprint": "1998|199800568|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800568|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "6492fb3ae136bceb", "measure_id": "199800568", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "For the election of each member of the governing board of the Los Molinos Unified School District by the registered voters of the entire Los Molinos Unified School District?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 521, "no_votes": 538, "total_votes": 1059, "percent_yes": 49.19735599622285, "percent_no": 50.80264400377715, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2026-04-12T10:53:37.530375", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.936647", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.196574", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "For the election of each member of the governing board of the Los Molinos Unified School District by the registered voters of the entire Los Molinos Unified School District?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10886, "fingerprint": "1998|199800079|TEHAMA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800079|TEHAMA", "content_hash": "2df799e081624804", "measure_id": "199800079", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tehama", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "In order to provide a new library and additional restrooms; renovate classrooms and upgrade aging pluming, heating, cooling, and electrical systems; and construct classrooms for science, business, and computer education, shall the Corning Union High School District be authorized to issue up to $3,625,000 of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit, to acquire, construct, and renovate school facilities and grounds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1362, "no_votes": 1145, "total_votes": 2507, "percent_yes": 54.32788193059434, "percent_no": 45.67211806940566, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-04-14", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.936015", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.196199", "update_count": 3, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "In order to provide a new library and additional restrooms; renovate classrooms and upgrade aging pluming, heating, cooling, and electrical systems; and construct classrooms for science, business, and computer education, shall the Corning Union High School District be authorized to issue up to $3,625,000 of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit, to acquire, construct, and renovate school facilities and grounds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tehama_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10894, "fingerprint": "1998|199800569|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800569|TULARE", "content_hash": "9c95ecfd8954d3bd", "measure_id": "199800569", "measure_letter": "1", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall Dan Von Gary Gregory be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 68, "no_votes": 116, "total_votes": 184, "percent_yes": 36.95652173913043, "percent_no": 63.04347826086957, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "R", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Recall", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.939338", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.198053", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Dan Von Gary Gregory be recalled (removed) from the office of Governing Board Member?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Recall", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10895, "fingerprint": "1998|199800570|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800570|TULARE", "content_hash": "81a1afc947c237ea", "measure_id": "199800570", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide students with classrooms for math, science, vocational training, and basic high school requirements, offer comparable classrooms to all students, and give students access to technology shall Delano Joint Union High School District construct and acquire a new high school in Delano by issuing $27 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit provided that spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee and no money goes to administrative salaries?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 687, "no_votes": 235, "total_votes": 922, "percent_yes": 74.51193058568329, "percent_no": 25.488069414316712, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.939661", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.198235", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide students with classrooms for math, science, vocational training, and basic high school requirements, offer comparable classrooms to all students, and give students access to technology shall Delano Joint Union High School District construct and acquire a new high school in Delano by issuing $27 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit provided that spending is annually reviewed by an independent citizen\u2019s oversight committee and no money goes to administrative salaries?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10893, "fingerprint": "1998|199800504|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800504|TULARE", "content_hash": "5f4f1482b76206f4", "measure_id": "199800504", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Charter proposed for the City of Exeter be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 985, "no_votes": 503, "total_votes": 1488, "percent_yes": 66.19623655913979, "percent_no": 33.80376344086021, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Charter Amendment", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.939067", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.197864", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Charter proposed for the City of Exeter be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Charter Amendment", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10888, "fingerprint": "1998|199800231|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800231|TULARE", "content_hash": "10c10c27f34f40b3", "measure_id": "199800231", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District sell bonds to repair and renovate old classrooms to reduce student overcrowding; provide science labs and classrooms; re-wire and upgrade classrooms to accommodate computer technology; expand and upgrade the library; and add classrooms for vocational and agricultural education and other permanent school improvements at the high school in an amount not exceeding $10,100,000 at an interest rate not exceeding the maximum allowed by law?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 359, "no_votes": 207, "total_votes": 566, "percent_yes": 63.42756183745583, "percent_no": 36.57243816254417, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.937538", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.196946", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Kingsburg Joint Union High School District sell bonds to repair and renovate old classrooms to reduce student overcrowding; provide science labs and classrooms; re-wire and upgrade classrooms to accommodate computer technology; expand and upgrade the library; and add classrooms for vocational and agricultural education and other permanent school improvements at the high school in an amount not exceeding $10,100,000 at an interest rate not exceeding the maximum allowed by law?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10890, "fingerprint": "1998|199800233|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800233|TULARE", "content_hash": "c7d0b7c8b8e8cb71", "measure_id": "199800233", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Visalia Unified School District issue $91 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit to construct and acquire new classrooms and school buildings to reduce overcrowding, repair schools, upgrade math and science labs, remodel classrooms, improve school security for student safety and rewire schools in order to utilize current and future technology in the classroom?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12518, "no_votes": 8743, "total_votes": 21261, "percent_yes": 58.87775739617139, "percent_no": 41.12224260382861, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.938111", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.197313", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Visalia Unified School District issue $91 million of bonds at interest rates below the legal limit to construct and acquire new classrooms and school buildings to reduce overcrowding, repair schools, upgrade math and science labs, remodel classrooms, improve school security for student safety and rewire schools in order to utilize current and future technology in the classroom?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10892, "fingerprint": "1998|199800235|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800235|TULARE", "content_hash": "af0c8b126add67fa", "measure_id": "199800235", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a new student events center, remove the transportation bus yard from the center of the high school campus, construct additional classrooms, complete the wiring of the high school campus for computer and communication technologies and improve educational facilities to accommodate growing student enrollment, shall the Woodlake Union High School District issue bonds not to exceed $3.6 million with an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1471, "no_votes": 529, "total_votes": 2000, "percent_yes": 73.55000000000001, "percent_no": 26.44999999999999, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.938790", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.197676", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a new student events center, remove the transportation bus yard from the center of the high school campus, construct additional classrooms, complete the wiring of the high school campus for computer and communication technologies and improve educational facilities to accommodate growing student enrollment, shall the Woodlake Union High School District issue bonds not to exceed $3.6 million with an interest rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10887, "fingerprint": "1998|199800230|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800230|TULARE", "content_hash": "a95a378692056d69", "measure_id": "199800230", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To build two classrooms, a library and restrooms, shall the Buena Vista Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $233,000, with interest at a rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 73, "no_votes": 20, "total_votes": 93, "percent_yes": 78.49462365591397, "percent_no": 21.50537634408603, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.937111", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.196761", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To build two classrooms, a library and restrooms, shall the Buena Vista Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $233,000, with interest at a rate not to exceed the statutory maximum?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10889, "fingerprint": "1998|199800232|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800232|TULARE", "content_hash": "fdf44de5896e4922", "measure_id": "199800232", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "Shall the Sundale Union School District be authorized to issue $1,250,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limits for the following purposes: Construction of a new multipurpose cafeteria and construction of new classrooms?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 382, "no_votes": 118, "total_votes": 500, "percent_yes": 76.4, "percent_no": 23.599999999999994, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.937829", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.197129", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Sundale Union School District be authorized to issue $1,250,000 of bonds at interest rates within the legal limits for the following purposes: Construction of a new multipurpose cafeteria and construction of new classrooms?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10891, "fingerprint": "1998|199800234|TULARE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800234|TULARE", "content_hash": "60b1c812f6c7ea50", "measure_id": "199800234", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tulare", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To construct a cafeteria for the F. J. White Elementary School, complete construction of the Woodlake Valley Middle School recreation building, wire classrooms for up-to-date computer and communication technology, improve educational facilities to accommodate a steadily growing student enrollment, shall the Woodlake Union Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $2.5 million, with interest at a rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 753, "no_votes": 297, "total_votes": 1050, "percent_yes": 71.71428571428572, "percent_no": 28.285714285714278, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.938422", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.197494", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To construct a cafeteria for the F. J. White Elementary School, complete construction of the Woodlake Valley Middle School recreation building, wire classrooms for up-to-date computer and communication technology, improve educational facilities to accommodate a steadily growing student enrollment, shall the Woodlake Union Elementary School District be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $2.5 million, with interest at a rate not to exceed the legal limit?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tulare_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Tulare County Elections", "url": "https://tularecoelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10896, "fingerprint": "1998|199800236|TUOLUMNE|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800236|TUOLUMNE", "content_hash": "b7e435363642c37c", "measure_id": "199800236", "measure_letter": "Q", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Tuolumne", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To continue providing quality education programs shall the Summerville Union High School District issue $9,991,000 in General Obligation Bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit, to add educational and required support facilities in order to reduce the size of individual classes, to improve the safety of students and modernize current facilities with available State funds to match District funds?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2305, "no_votes": 1078, "total_votes": 3383, "percent_yes": 68.13479160508425, "percent_no": 31.865208394915754, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.939963", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.198427", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue providing quality education programs shall the Summerville Union High School District issue $9,991,000 in General Obligation Bonds, at an interest rate within the legal limit, to add educational and required support facilities in order to reduce the size of individual classes, to improve the safety of students and modernize current facilities with available State funds to match District funds?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Tuolumne_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10897, "fingerprint": "1998|199800299|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800299|VENTURA", "content_hash": "55c773982d6ab635", "measure_id": "199800299", "measure_letter": "A", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should the County and each of its ten cities establish growth boundaries preserving farmland, open space and scenic vistas by: (1) adopting by ordinance six existing and five proposed greenbelts and preventing uses incompatible with commercial agriculture; (2) prohibiting changes to external community boundaries unless approved by voters, including amendments no more than once every ten years; and (3) forming an Open Space/Agriculture Conservation District to receive public/private funds to acquire open space lands and farmland?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 132010, "no_votes": 59775, "total_votes": 191785, "percent_yes": 68.83228615376593, "percent_no": 31.167713846234065, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.940315", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.198612", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should the County and each of its ten cities establish growth boundaries preserving farmland, open space and scenic vistas by: (1) adopting by ordinance six existing and five proposed greenbelts and preventing uses incompatible with commercial agriculture; (2) prohibiting changes to external community boundaries unless approved by voters, including amendments no more than once every ten years; and (3) forming an Open Space/Agriculture Conservation District to receive public/private funds to acquire open space lands and farmland?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10898, "fingerprint": "1998|199800300|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800300|VENTURA", "content_hash": "c828fff6c1b7447e", "measure_id": "199800300", "measure_letter": "B", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should an ordinance be adopted requiring, with limited exceptions, a vote of the people for changes to the County?s General Plan Open Space, Agricultural, and Rural policies and land use designations for the unincorporated areas of the county until the year 2021 or until the ordinance is earlier repealed by vote of the people?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 120106, "no_votes": 71558, "total_votes": 191664, "percent_yes": 62.66487185908674, "percent_no": 37.33512814091326, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.940713", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.198826", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should an ordinance be adopted requiring, with limited exceptions, a vote of the people for changes to the County?s General Plan Open Space, Agricultural, and Rural policies and land use designations for the unincorporated areas of the county until the year 2021 or until the ordinance is earlier repealed by vote of the people?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10899, "fingerprint": "1998|199800505|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800505|VENTURA", "content_hash": "1ded93c22180f445", "measure_id": "199800505", "measure_letter": "C", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Camarillo Measure entitled \u201cCamarillo save open space and agricultural resources ordinance amending the Camarillo general plan by adopting the Camarillo urban restriction boundary\u201d be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13032, "no_votes": 6172, "total_votes": 19204, "percent_yes": 67.86086232034992, "percent_no": 32.13913767965008, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.940999", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.199014", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Camarillo Measure entitled \u201cCamarillo save open space and agricultural resources ordinance amending the Camarillo general plan by adopting the Camarillo urban restriction boundary\u201d be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10900, "fingerprint": "1998|199800506|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800506|VENTURA", "content_hash": "a19101b4e35e4d96", "measure_id": "199800506", "measure_letter": "D", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the City of Fillmore establish a utilities user tax of 4.5% of the charges for telephone, electricity, gas, water, wastewater treatment, and cable television, with all revenues from said utilities user tax placed in the City\u2019s general fund to be used for the general governmental expenses of the City which include, but are not limited to, the expenditure categories of Public Safety, General Government, Parks and Recreation, Community Development and Public Works?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 848, "no_votes": 1967, "total_votes": 2815, "percent_yes": 30.12433392539964, "percent_no": 69.87566607460036, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.941309", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.199207", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the City of Fillmore establish a utilities user tax of 4.5% of the charges for telephone, electricity, gas, water, wastewater treatment, and cable television, with all revenues from said utilities user tax placed in the City\u2019s general fund to be used for the general governmental expenses of the City which include, but are not limited to, the expenditure categories of Public Safety, General Government, Parks and Recreation, Community Development and Public Works?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10901, "fingerprint": "1998|199800507|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800507|VENTURA", "content_hash": "822663c81c012888", "measure_id": "199800507", "measure_letter": "I", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance of the People of the City of Ojai, California that adopts a ten percent (10%) Transient Occupancy Tax, which applies only to transient occupants of hotels (as defined in Section 8-1.404 of the Ojai Municipal Code), all as set forth in Article 4, Section 8-1.410 of the Ojai Municipal Code, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1796, "no_votes": 744, "total_votes": 2540, "percent_yes": 70.70866141732284, "percent_no": 29.291338582677156, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.941607", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.199396", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance of the People of the City of Ojai, California that adopts a ten percent (10%) Transient Occupancy Tax, which applies only to transient occupants of hotels (as defined in Section 8-1.404 of the Ojai Municipal Code), all as set forth in Article 4, Section 8-1.410 of the Ojai Municipal Code, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10902, "fingerprint": "1998|199800508|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800508|VENTURA", "content_hash": "35f771335ad54557", "measure_id": "199800508", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an Ordinance of the People of the City of Ojai, California that retroactively approves the ten percent (10%) Transient Occupancy Tax, which applies only to transient occupants of hotels (as defined in Section 8-1.404 of the Ojai Municipal Code), all as set forth in Article 4, Section 8-1.410 of the Ojai Municipal Code, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1590, "no_votes": 1008, "total_votes": 2598, "percent_yes": 61.20092378752887, "percent_no": 38.79907621247113, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.941882", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.199577", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an Ordinance of the People of the City of Ojai, California that retroactively approves the ten percent (10%) Transient Occupancy Tax, which applies only to transient occupants of hotels (as defined in Section 8-1.404 of the Ojai Municipal Code), all as set forth in Article 4, Section 8-1.410 of the Ojai Municipal Code, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10903, "fingerprint": "1998|199800509|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800509|VENTURA", "content_hash": "da16d00487f61e9f", "measure_id": "199800509", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources (SOAR) Ordinance be enacted, establishing a City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB); prohibiting urban development outside of CURB until December 31, 2020 unless approved by the voters; establishing a City Buffer Boundary (CBB); and prohibiting changing the designation of land within the CBB that is designated \u2018Agriculture\u2019 in the Oxnard 2020 General Plan, unless approved by the voters?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 17597, "no_votes": 7611, "total_votes": 25208, "percent_yes": 69.80720406220247, "percent_no": 30.192795937797527, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.942227", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.199780", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources (SOAR) Ordinance be enacted, establishing a City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB); prohibiting urban development outside of CURB until December 31, 2020 unless approved by the voters; establishing a City Buffer Boundary (CBB); and prohibiting changing the designation of land within the CBB that is designated \u2018Agriculture\u2019 in the Oxnard 2020 General Plan, unless approved by the voters?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10904, "fingerprint": "1998|199800510|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800510|VENTURA", "content_hash": "35437d3876b62fff", "measure_id": "199800510", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the voters adopt the proposed Ordinance to establish a utility tax of 4.5% of the charges for telephone, electricity, gas, water, wastewater treatment, and cable television, to be used exclusively to hire additional Police and Fire personnel and to increase Police and Fire services, salaries and equipment?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2192, "no_votes": 3615, "total_votes": 5807, "percent_yes": 37.74754606509385, "percent_no": 62.25245393490615, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.942577", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.200036", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the voters adopt the proposed Ordinance to establish a utility tax of 4.5% of the charges for telephone, electricity, gas, water, wastewater treatment, and cable television, to be used exclusively to hire additional Police and Fire personnel and to increase Police and Fire services, salaries and equipment?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10905, "fingerprint": "1998|199800511|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800511|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e178adc961b68614", "measure_id": "199800511", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which amends the Santa Paula General Plan in a manner which restricts urban services and urban development to an area within a \u201cCity Urban Restriction Boundary\u201d that includes all of the area within the City\u2019s Sphere of influence as it existed on April 13, 1998 as well as General Plan \u201cExpansion Areas\u201d known as \u201cEast Area 2\" and \u201cFagan Canyon?\u201d", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 1914, "no_votes": 3717, "total_votes": 5631, "percent_yes": 33.990410229088965, "percent_no": 66.00958977091103, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.942853", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.200257", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which amends the Santa Paula General Plan in a manner which restricts urban services and urban development to an area within a \u201cCity Urban Restriction Boundary\u201d that includes all of the area within the City\u2019s Sphere of influence as it existed on April 13, 1998 as well as General Plan \u201cExpansion Areas\u201d known as \u201cEast Area 2\" and \u201cFagan Canyon?\u201d", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10906, "fingerprint": "1998|199800512|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800512|VENTURA", "content_hash": "a104c13be77f339c", "measure_id": "199800512", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which amends the Santa Paula General Plan in a manner which restricts urban services and \u201curbanized uses of land\u201d to an area within an urban growth boundary consisting of the City boundaries as existed on January 1, 1998?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 2148, "no_votes": 3364, "total_votes": 5512, "percent_yes": 38.96952104499274, "percent_no": 61.03047895500726, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.943154", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.200484", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall an ordinance be adopted which amends the Santa Paula General Plan in a manner which restricts urban services and \u201curbanized uses of land\u201d to an area within an urban growth boundary consisting of the City boundaries as existed on January 1, 1998?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10907, "fingerprint": "1998|199800513|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800513|VENTURA", "content_hash": "9c1cbe8e9ab09830", "measure_id": "199800513", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance of the City of Simi Valley to preserve open space and establish a City Urban Restriction Boundary, which ordinance is to be effective only upon enactment by the electorate of a comparable measure applicable to the unincorporated areas of Ventura County, be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19765, "no_votes": 8406, "total_votes": 28171, "percent_yes": 70.16080366334172, "percent_no": 29.839196336658276, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.943424", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.200702", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance of the City of Simi Valley to preserve open space and establish a City Urban Restriction Boundary, which ordinance is to be effective only upon enactment by the electorate of a comparable measure applicable to the unincorporated areas of Ventura County, be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10908, "fingerprint": "1998|199800514|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800514|VENTURA", "content_hash": "f272fbbf2418a3e8", "measure_id": "199800514", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the ordinance amending the City\u2019s General Plan toe create an Urban Restriction Boundary be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 19421, "no_votes": 9639, "total_votes": 29060, "percent_yes": 66.83069511355816, "percent_no": 33.169304886441836, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.943695", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.200934", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the ordinance amending the City\u2019s General Plan toe create an Urban Restriction Boundary be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10909, "fingerprint": "1998|199800571|VENTURA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800571|VENTURA", "content_hash": "e502c410fc86b651", "measure_id": "199800571", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Ventura", "jurisdiction": "3", "title": "To provide safe and healthy classrooms in the Conejo Valley Unified School District by building permanent classrooms, providing classrooms for class-size reduction, replacing aging roofs, upgrading ventilation systems to current health/safety standards, wiring for technology, and providing other critical repairs and improvements, shall the District issue $88 million ($88,000,000) in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, and appoint a citizens advisory committee and independent auditor to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 27308, "no_votes": 10480, "total_votes": 37788, "percent_yes": 72.26632793479412, "percent_no": 27.73367206520588, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "GO Bond", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.943969", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.201171", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To provide safe and healthy classrooms in the Conejo Valley Unified School District by building permanent classrooms, providing classrooms for class-size reduction, replacing aging roofs, upgrading ventilation systems to current health/safety standards, wiring for technology, and providing other critical repairs and improvements, shall the District issue $88 million ($88,000,000) in bonds at the lowest interest rates possible, and appoint a citizens advisory committee and independent auditor to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Bond", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Ventura_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ventura County Elections", "url": "https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10910, "fingerprint": "1998|199800139|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800139|YOLO", "content_hash": "ffe37ab864a9e418", "measure_id": "199800139", "measure_letter": "J", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall the board of Supervisors of the County of Yolo by ordinance establish the appointive office of Director of Finance and eliminate the elective offices of Auditor-Controller and Treasurer-Tax Collector effective upon expiration of the current terms of the single incumbent of both offices?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 13126, "no_votes": 21456, "total_votes": 34582, "percent_yes": 37.9561621652883, "percent_no": 62.0438378347117, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.944352", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.201413", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the board of Supervisors of the County of Yolo by ordinance establish the appointive office of Director of Finance and eliminate the elective offices of Auditor-Controller and Treasurer-Tax Collector effective upon expiration of the current terms of the single incumbent of both offices?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10914, "fingerprint": "1998|199800185|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800185|YOLO", "content_hash": "20d2760979893243", "measure_id": "199800185", "measure_letter": "K", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall any new voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland fund only the following City Services, Programs, and Facilities? Repair streets, fill potholes and improve storm drainage and flood control facilities throughout the City; Provide for additional police officers and crime-fighting capabilities; Improve and maintain youth and recreation programs.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 6257, "no_votes": 3848, "total_votes": 10105, "percent_yes": 61.9198416625433, "percent_no": 38.0801583374567, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Advisory", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.945533", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.202338", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall any new voter approved sales tax in the City of Woodland fund only the following City Services, Programs, and Facilities? Repair streets, fill potholes and improve storm drainage and flood control facilities throughout the City; Provide for additional police officers and crime-fighting capabilities; Improve and maintain youth and recreation programs.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Advisory", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10915, "fingerprint": "1998|199800186|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800186|YOLO", "content_hash": "953294feeb4b2112", "measure_id": "199800186", "measure_letter": "L", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Shall the Woodland City Council enact a one-half cent sales tax for general City Services, Programs and Facilities, with the following mandatory restrictions?  The sales tax will expire after four years, unless reauthorized by the voters; an independent Oversight Committee will conduct yearly audits of all sales tax expenditures; annually, a detained spending plan and report will be presented to the public and published in local newspapers.", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4488, "no_votes": 5686, "total_votes": 10174, "percent_yes": 44.11244348338903, "percent_no": 55.88755651661097, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "Fail", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Sales Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.945857", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.202575", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall the Woodland City Council enact a one-half cent sales tax for general City Services, Programs and Facilities, with the following mandatory restrictions?  The sales tax will expire after four years, unless reauthorized by the voters; an independent Oversight Committee will conduct yearly audits of all sales tax expenditures; annually, a detained spending plan and report will be presented to the public and published in local newspapers.", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Sales Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10911, "fingerprint": "1998|199800182|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800182|YOLO", "content_hash": "f81471281f7739ac", "measure_id": "199800182", "measure_letter": "M", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "To continue funding for the maintenance of City parks, open space, public facilities and street lighting, shall the Park Maintenance Tax, Ordinance No. 1927, which establishes a parcel tax to replace the City\u2019s Landscaping and Lighting District assessment, be approved?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 12409, "no_votes": 3368, "total_votes": 15777, "percent_yes": 78.65246878367243, "percent_no": 21.347531216327567, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Property Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.944665", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.201642", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "To continue funding for the maintenance of City parks, open space, public facilities and street lighting, shall the Park Maintenance Tax, Ordinance No. 1927, which establishes a parcel tax to replace the City\u2019s Landscaping and Lighting District assessment, be approved?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Property Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10912, "fingerprint": "1998|199800183|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800183|YOLO", "content_hash": "5c2e2eb38f00b396", "measure_id": "199800183", "measure_letter": "O", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do the voters of the City of Winters approve of the continuation of the existing $5.00 per month Municipal Services Tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 930, "no_votes": 362, "total_votes": 1292, "percent_yes": 71.9814241486068, "percent_no": 28.018575851393194, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.944968", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.201883", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do the voters of the City of Winters approve of the continuation of the existing $5.00 per month Municipal Services Tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10913, "fingerprint": "1998|199800184|YOLO|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800184|YOLO", "content_hash": "08aba3b5a9bd9a6f", "measure_id": "199800184", "measure_letter": "P", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Yolo", "jurisdiction": "2", "title": "Do the voters of the City of Winters approve of the continuation of the existing 5% per month Utility Users Tax?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 890, "no_votes": 408, "total_votes": 1298, "percent_yes": 68.56702619414484, "percent_no": 31.432973805855156, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "PassT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Utility Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-06-02", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.945267", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.202109", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Do the voters of the City of Winters approve of the continuation of the existing 5% per month Utility Users Tax?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Utility Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yolo_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Yolo County Elections", "url": "https://www.yoloelections.org", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "government"}]}, {"id": 10917, "fingerprint": "1998|199800301|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800301|YUBA", "content_hash": "9d39a89645c7de04", "measure_id": "199800301", "measure_letter": "N", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Shall Ordinance No. 1229 which continues in effect an eight (8) percent occupancy tax, and authorizes the Yuba County Board of Supervisors to increase the tax rate to ten  (10) percent, be imposed upon temporary lodgers in hotels, motels, and similar temporary lodging facilities?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 4769, "no_votes": 8072, "total_votes": 12841, "percent_yes": 37.13885211432132, "percent_no": 62.86114788567868, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": "FailT", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-11-03", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.946463", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.202984", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Shall Ordinance No. 1229 which continues in effect an eight (8) percent occupancy tax, and authorizes the Yuba County Board of Supervisors to increase the tax rate to ten  (10) percent, be imposed upon temporary lodgers in hotels, motels, and similar temporary lodging facilities?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Miscellaneous Tax", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 10916, "fingerprint": "1998|199800009|YUBA|CEDA", "measure_fingerprint": "1998|199800009|YUBA", "content_hash": "e77a47bbc7758980", "measure_id": "199800009", "measure_letter": "R", "year": 1998, "state": "CA", "county": "Yuba", "jurisdiction": "1", "title": "Should Yuba County Ordinance Number 1219 (Yuba County Raceway Measure) be adopted?", "description": null, "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": 7052, "no_votes": 1115, "total_votes": 8167, "percent_yes": 86.34749602057059, "percent_no": 13.652503979429412, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": "Pass", "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "M", "topic_primary": null, "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": "Ordinance", "category_topic": null, "data_source": "CEDA", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 1, "election_date": "1998-01-27", "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-31 00:28:37", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 14:37:12.946169", "last_seen_at": "2026-04-12T14:37:06.202800", "update_count": 2, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Should Yuba County Ordinance Number 1219 (Yuba County Raceway Measure) be adopted?", "source": "CEDA", "display_topic": null, "display_category_type": "Ordinance", "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/Yuba_County,_California_ballot_measures", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CEDA Data Archive", "url": "https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/California-Elections-Data-Archive-CEDA/99257830890201671", "confidence": "high", "icon": "academic"}]}, {"id": 1073, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1051|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1051|Statewide", "content_hash": "5b920483dd959759", "measure_id": "CA1051", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 195", "description": "Murder: Special Circumstances.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 85.80000305, "percent_no": 14.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 195", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_195_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20195%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20195%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1072, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1050|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1050|Statewide", "content_hash": "7f0a69fd9ee56cd3", "measure_id": "CA1050", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 196", "description": "Murder: Punishment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 85.80000305, "percent_no": 14.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 196", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_196_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20196%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20196%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1071, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1049|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1049|Statewide", "content_hash": "102077d27b69cca7", "measure_id": "CA1049", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 213", "description": "Limitations on Recovery to Felons, Uninsured Motorists, Drunk Drivers. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 76.90000153, "percent_no": 23.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative statute imposed limitations on the legal recovery rights of c...", "summary_text": "This initiative statute imposed limitations on the legal recovery rights of certain categories of individuals including felons, uninsured motorists, and drunk drivers in civil lawsuits. The measure restricted these parties' ability to collect damages in personal injury cases under specified circumstances.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 213", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_213_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20213%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20213%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1070, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1048|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1048|Statewide", "content_hash": "50908cb349b952f5", "measure_id": "CA1048", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 194", "description": "Prisoners: Joint Venture Program: Unemployment Benefits, Parole.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.90000153, "percent_no": 26.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure addressed policies related to prisoner joint venture prog...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure addressed policies related to prisoner joint venture programs, unemployment benefits for former inmates, and parole procedures. It modified existing regulations governing these aspects of California's correctional and post-release systems.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 194", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_194_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20194%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20194%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1069, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1047|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1047|Statewide", "content_hash": "df98f6de25ff9f37", "measure_id": "CA1047", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 193", "description": "Property Tax: Purchase/Change in Ownership: Parent Child Transfer. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.30000305, "percent_no": 32.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1996 California constitutional amendment expanded property tax protectio...", "summary_text": "This 1996 California constitutional amendment expanded property tax protections by allowing parents to transfer their property's existing tax assessment to their children without triggering a reassessment to current market value. The measure extended existing Proposition 13 protections to cover intergenerational property transfers between parents and children.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 193", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_193_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20193%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20193%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1068, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1046|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1046|Statewide", "content_hash": "878b9e587005d3d2", "measure_id": "CA1046", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 204", "description": "Safe, Clean, Reliable Water Supply Act.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.90000153, "percent_no": 37.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $995 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $995 million in general obligation bonds to fund water quality, supply, and flood control projects. The bonds would finance improvements to water treatment facilities, groundwater cleanup, dam safety upgrades, and flood protection infrastructure throughout California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 204", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_204_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20204%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20204%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1067, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1045|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1045|Statewide", "content_hash": "1691f988d82dfcd7", "measure_id": "CA1045", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 203", "description": "Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 1996.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.0, "percent_no": 38.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 1996 authorized the state of Cali...", "summary_text": "The Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 1996 authorized the state of California to issue bonds to fund construction, modernization, and renovation of public school facilities. The measure provided funding for capital improvements to public elementary, middle, and high schools throughout the state.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 203", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_203_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20203%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20203%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1066, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1044|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1044|Statewide", "content_hash": "1615ae54b3ece20e", "measure_id": "CA1044", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 210", "description": "Minimum Wage Increase. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.5, "percent_no": 38.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1996 California initiative statute increased the state's minimum wage ab...", "summary_text": "This 1996 California initiative statute increased the state's minimum wage above the federal level. The measure established a higher minimum wage requirement for workers in California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 210", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_210_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20210%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20210%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1065, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1043|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1043|Statewide", "content_hash": "0ef89f1566c97b19", "measure_id": "CA1043", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 208", "description": "Campaign Contributions and Spending Limits. Restricts Lobbyists. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.29999924, "percent_no": 38.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1996 California initiative statute imposed limits on campaign contributi...", "summary_text": "This 1996 California initiative statute imposed limits on campaign contributions and spending while establishing restrictions on lobbyist activities. The measure passed with 61.3% voter approval, implementing new regulations on political fundraising and lobbying practices statewide.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 208", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_208_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20208%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20208%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1064, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1042|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1042|Statewide", "content_hash": "90f439c2d28eca1c", "measure_id": "CA1042", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 192", "description": "Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of 1996", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.90000153, "percent_no": 40.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of 1996 authorized the state to issue bonds to ...", "summary_text": "The Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of 1996 authorized the state to issue bonds to fund seismic safety improvements to public buildings, bridges, and other infrastructure. The measure provided funding for earthquake retrofitting projects to reduce potential damage from future seismic events.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 192", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_192_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20192%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20192%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1063, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1041|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1041|Statewide", "content_hash": "6363ae5c4ff754c3", "measure_id": "CA1041", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 198", "description": "Open Primary. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.5, "percent_no": 40.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established an open primary system in California where all candi...", "summary_text": "This measure established an open primary system in California where all candidates for an office would appear on the same primary ballot regardless of party affiliation, and all voters could vote for any candidate. The top vote-getter from each party would then advance to the general election.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 198", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_198_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20198%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20198%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1062, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1040|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1040|Statewide", "content_hash": "85f38db7e49c7696", "measure_id": "CA1040", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 218", "description": "Voter Approval for Local Government Taxes. Limitations on Fees, Assessments and Charges. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.59999847, "percent_no": 43.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required voter approval for new local government taxes and place...", "summary_text": "This measure required voter approval for new local government taxes and placed limitations on local fees, assessments, and charges. It amended the California Constitution to give voters more control over local tax increases.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 218", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_218_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20218%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20218%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1061, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1039|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1039|Statewide", "content_hash": "19766df83a521cd6", "measure_id": "CA1039", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 215", "description": "Medical Use of Marijuana. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.59999847, "percent_no": 44.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1996 California ballot measure legalized the medical use of marijuana fo...", "summary_text": "This 1996 California ballot measure legalized the medical use of marijuana for patients with serious illnesses when recommended by a physician. The initiative allowed patients and their caregivers to possess and cultivate marijuana for medical purposes without being subject to state criminal penalties.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 215", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_215_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20215%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20215%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1060, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1038|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1038|Statewide", "content_hash": "a1db087d290a9054", "measure_id": "CA1038", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 209", "description": "Prohibition Against Discrimination or Preferential Treatment by State and Other Public Entities. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.59999847, "percent_no": 45.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Education: Higher Ed | Labor & Employment | Local Government | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the California Constitution to prohibit state and local ...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the California Constitution to prohibit state and local government entities from discriminating against or giving preferential treatment to individuals or groups based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, education, and contracting. It effectively ended affirmative action programs in these areas of public sector activity.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 209", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_209_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20209%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20209%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1059, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1037|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1037|Statewide", "content_hash": "9015a5a7062eb6ea", "measure_id": "CA1037", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 206", "description": "Veterans' Bond Act of 1996", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.59999847, "percent_no": 46.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 206", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_206_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20206%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20206%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1058, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1036|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1036|Statewide", "content_hash": "d4f3c02b6e2566b0", "measure_id": "CA1036", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 217", "description": "Top Income Tax Brackets. Reinstatement. Revenues to Local Agencies. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.20000076, "percent_no": 50.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have reinstated higher income tax brackets for California'...", "summary_text": "This measure would have reinstated higher income tax brackets for California's highest earners and directed the additional revenue to local government agencies. It failed with 49.2% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 217", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_217_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20217%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20217%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1057, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1035|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1035|Statewide", "content_hash": "7c015d32b03a53df", "measure_id": "CA1035", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 212", "description": "Spending Limits and Campaign Contributions. Repeals Gift and Honoraria Limits. Restricts Lobbyists. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.09999847, "percent_no": 50.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed spending limits on state and local political ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed spending limits on state and local political campaigns, restricted campaign contributions, repealed existing limits on gifts and honoraria to public officials, and placed new restrictions on lobbyist activities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 212", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_212_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20212%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20212%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1056, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1034|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1034|Statewide", "content_hash": "3dd0db254dce9787", "measure_id": "CA1034", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 202", "description": "Attorney's Contingency Fees, Limits. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.79999924, "percent_no": 51.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1996 California initiative would have placed limits on the contingency f...", "summary_text": "This 1996 California initiative would have placed limits on the contingency fees that attorneys can charge their clients. The measure failed with 48.8% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 202", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_202_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20202%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20202%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1055, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1033|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1033|Statewide", "content_hash": "c5138b368f4e33ad", "measure_id": "CA1033", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 214", "description": "Health Care. Consumer Protection. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.0, "percent_no": 58.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1996 California initiative would have established consumer protection re...", "summary_text": "This 1996 California initiative would have established consumer protection regulations for health care services and providers. The measure failed with 42% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 214", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_214_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20214%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20214%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1054, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1032|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1032|Statewide", "content_hash": "7e1f356397762a00", "measure_id": "CA1032", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 197", "description": "Wildlife: Mountain Lions.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.90000153, "percent_no": 58.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 197", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_197_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20197%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20197%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1053, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1031|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1031|Statewide", "content_hash": "8c5911e146ad87d5", "measure_id": "CA1031", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 201", "description": "Attorney Fees, Shareholder Actions, Class Actions. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.70000076, "percent_no": 59.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required losing parties in shareholder lawsuits and c...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required losing parties in shareholder lawsuits and class action suits to pay the attorney fees of the winning parties. It also would have established additional procedural requirements for filing and conducting such lawsuits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 201", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_201_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20201%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20201%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1052, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1030|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1030|Statewide", "content_hash": "f9aecdf14ac96c59", "measure_id": "CA1030", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 205", "description": "Youthful and Adult Offender Local Facilities Bond Act of 1996.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.59999847, "percent_no": 59.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice | Juvenile Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construct...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construction and improvement of local juvenile detention facilities and adult jail facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through the state's general fund.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 205", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_205_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20205%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20205%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1051, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1029|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1029|Statewide", "content_hash": "c1785a59ee22b761", "measure_id": "CA1029", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 199", "description": "Mobile Home Rent Assistance/Control Restrictions. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.20000076, "percent_no": 60.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1996 California ballot measure would have provided rent assistance for m...", "summary_text": "This 1996 California ballot measure would have provided rent assistance for mobile home residents and restricted local governments' ability to implement rent control on mobile homes. The initiative failed with 39.2% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 199", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_199_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20199%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20199%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1050, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1028|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1028|Statewide", "content_hash": "cc8afe0a5ca7934a", "measure_id": "CA1028", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 216", "description": "Health Care. Consumer Protection. Taxes on Corporate Restructuring. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.70000076, "percent_no": 61.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Health | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1996 California initiative would have established health care consumer p...", "summary_text": "This 1996 California initiative would have established health care consumer protections and imposed taxes on corporate restructuring activities. The measure failed with 38.7% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 216", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_216_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20216%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20216%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1049, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1027|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1027|Statewide", "content_hash": "3ee01a7ae4bfdd6f", "measure_id": "CA1027", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 200", "description": "No Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance. Tort Liability. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.79999924, "percent_no": 65.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have established a no-fault motor vehicle insurance...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have established a no-fault motor vehicle insurance system in California, where drivers would collect compensation from their own insurance companies regardless of who caused an accident. It would have eliminated the right to sue for damages in most car accident cases, replacing the existing tort-based liability system.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 200", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_200_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20200%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20200%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1048, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1026|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1026|Statewide", "content_hash": "588cbb6fe52df9cc", "measure_id": "CA1026", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 207", "description": "Attorneys. Fees. Right to Negotiate. Frivolous Lawsuits. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.20000076, "percent_no": 65.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed parties in lawsuits to negotiate attorney fee...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed parties in lawsuits to negotiate attorney fee arrangements and established procedures for courts to identify and penalize frivolous lawsuits. It would have modified existing laws governing attorney fees and litigation practices in California courts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 207", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_207_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20207%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20207%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1047, "fingerprint": "1996|CA1025|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1996|CA1025|Statewide", "content_hash": "72629c8786744b8f", "measure_id": "CA1025", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1996, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 211", "description": "Attorney-Client Fee Arrangements. Securities Fraud. Lawsuits. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 25.60000038, "percent_no": 74.39999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Business & Commerce | Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required attorneys to disclose their fee arrangements...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required attorneys to disclose their fee arrangements with clients in writing and established new procedures for securities fraud lawsuits, including limitations on attorney fees in class action suits. It also would have created new requirements for attorney-client agreements and modified rules governing legal settlements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 211", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_211_(1996)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "CA Voter Guide", "url": "https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/", "confidence": "high", "icon": "government"}, {"source": "LAO Analysis", "url": "https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis?ba=1996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "analysis"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20211%201996", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20211%201996", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1046, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1024|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1024|Statewide", "content_hash": "147a012bc5f69083", "measure_id": "CA1024", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 189", "description": "Bail Exception. Felony Sexual Assault. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would amend the California Constitution to allow judges to deny ...", "summary_text": "This measure would amend the California Constitution to allow judges to deny bail to defendants charged with felony sexual assault when the evidence is clear and convincing and the person poses a substantial likelihood of harm to others. It creates an exception to the general right to bail for this specific category of serious crimes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 189", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_189_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20189%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20189%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1045, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1023|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1023|Statewide", "content_hash": "852905b803e93502", "measure_id": "CA1023", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 184", "description": "Increased Sentences. Repeat Offenders. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1994 California initiative statute increased prison sentences for repeat...", "summary_text": "This 1994 California initiative statute increased prison sentences for repeat offenders, establishing longer mandatory sentences for individuals convicted of multiple felonies. The measure required courts to impose enhanced penalties on defendants with prior serious or violent felony convictions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 184", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_184_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20184%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20184%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1044, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1022|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1022|Statewide", "content_hash": "166a16078b953ea6", "measure_id": "CA1022", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 183", "description": "Recall Elections. State Officers. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would establish procedures for recalling statewide elected offic...", "summary_text": "This measure would establish procedures for recalling statewide elected officials in California through a constitutional amendment. It would allow voters to petition for and hold special elections to remove state officers from office before their terms expire.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 183", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_183_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20183%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20183%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1043, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1021|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1021|Statewide", "content_hash": "6d92da8ae098a26a", "measure_id": "CA1021", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 190", "description": "Commission on Judicial Performance. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would establish a Commission on Judicial Performance with author...", "summary_text": "This measure would establish a Commission on Judicial Performance with authority to investigate complaints against judges and recommend disciplinary actions including removal from office. The commission would be composed of judges, attorneys, and public members appointed through a specified process.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 190", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_190_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20190%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20190%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1042, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1020|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1020|Statewide", "content_hash": "3e44e0ea1dc33a80", "measure_id": "CA1020", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 191", "description": "Justice Courts. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1994 California constitutional amendment would have restructured the sta...", "summary_text": "This 1994 California constitutional amendment would have restructured the state's justice court system by modifying the constitutional provisions governing these lower-level courts that handled minor criminal and civil matters. The measure would have changed how justice courts operated within California's judicial framework.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 191", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_191_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20191%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20191%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1041, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1019|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1019|Statewide", "content_hash": "0a07912257f524c9", "measure_id": "CA1019", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 187", "description": "Illegal Aliens. Ineligibility for Public Services. Verification and Reporting. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Education: Higher Ed | Education: PreK-12 | Health | Human Services | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1994 California ballot measure would have prohibited undocumented immigr...", "summary_text": "This 1994 California ballot measure would have prohibited undocumented immigrants from receiving most public services including public education, non-emergency healthcare, and social services, and required state agencies to verify immigration status and report suspected undocumented individuals to federal authorities. The measure passed but was largely blocked by federal courts and never fully implemented.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 187", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_187_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20187%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20187%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 1040, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1018|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1018|Statewide", "content_hash": "83e8aace53e843c9", "measure_id": "CA1018", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 181", "description": "Passenger Rail and Clean Air Bond Act of 1994.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1994 California ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue ...", "summary_text": "This 1994 California ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund passenger rail projects and clean air initiatives. The bond funding would have supported transportation infrastructure improvements aimed at reducing air pollution.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 181", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_181_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20181%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20181%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1039, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1017|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1017|Statewide", "content_hash": "46834f7c4f96e71d", "measure_id": "CA1017", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 188", "description": "Smoking and Tobacco Products. Local Preemption. Statewide Regulation. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established statewide regulations for smoking and tob...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established statewide regulations for smoking and tobacco products while limiting local governments' ability to enact stricter tobacco control ordinances than state law. It would have preempted local jurisdictions from passing more restrictive smoking bans or tobacco regulations beyond what the state requires.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 188", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_188_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20188%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20188%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1038, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1016|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1016|Statewide", "content_hash": "1b3092ab29e4dd11", "measure_id": "CA1016", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 186", "description": "Health Services Tax. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have imposed a tax on health services and establish...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have imposed a tax on health services and established a constitutional amendment and statute to implement and regulate this tax system. The measure failed to pass in the 1994 California election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 186", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_186_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20186%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20186%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1037, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1015|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1015|Statewide", "content_hash": "0aeee338005c568c", "measure_id": "CA1015", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 185", "description": "Public Transportation Trust Funds. Gasoline Sales Tax. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 79.40000153, "percent_no": 20.599998470000003, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have created a public transportation trust fund fin...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have created a public transportation trust fund financed by gasoline sales tax revenue. The funds would have been dedicated to public transportation projects and could not be diverted to other government uses.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 185", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_185_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20185%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20185%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1036, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1014|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1014|Statewide", "content_hash": "6aa0bcc8720a53e0", "measure_id": "CA1014", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 176", "description": "Taxation: Nonprofit Organizations. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.80000305, "percent_no": 28.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1994 California constitutional amendment modified tax provisions related...", "summary_text": "This 1994 California constitutional amendment modified tax provisions related to nonprofit organizations. The measure passed with 71.8% voter approval, changing how certain nonprofit entities are treated under state tax law.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 176", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_176_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20176%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20176%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1035, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1013|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1013|Statewide", "content_hash": "52dad38b21a388f3", "measure_id": "CA1013", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1B", "description": "Safe Schools Act of 1994.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.5, "percent_no": 32.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1B", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1B_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201B%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201B%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1034, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1012|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1012|Statewide", "content_hash": "8f1ca599921763e3", "measure_id": "CA1012", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 175", "description": "Renters' Income Tax Credit. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.90000153, "percent_no": 36.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have created a constitutional amendment allowing the state...", "summary_text": "This measure would have created a constitutional amendment allowing the state legislature to establish an income tax credit for renters in California. The credit would have provided tax relief to individuals and families who rent their primary residence rather than own it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 175", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_175_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20175%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20175%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1033, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1011|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1011|Statewide", "content_hash": "b500869d8c22ecf2", "measure_id": "CA1011", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 177", "description": "Property Tax Exemption. Disabled Persons' Access. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.09999847, "percent_no": 38.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment provided property tax exemptions for improvemen...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment provided property tax exemptions for improvements made to buildings to comply with disabled persons' accessibility requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act and related laws. The measure exempted the added value from accessibility modifications from being counted toward a property's assessed value for tax purposes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 177", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_177_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20177%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20177%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1032, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1010|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1010|Statewide", "content_hash": "c02ecd20a59ea488", "measure_id": "CA1010", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 178", "description": "Property Tax Exclusion. Water Conservation Equipment. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.79999924, "percent_no": 41.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Natural Resources | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have amended the California Constitution to exclude...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have amended the California Constitution to exclude water conservation equipment from property tax assessments. The measure failed despite receiving 58.8% support because constitutional amendments in California require a two-thirds majority to pass.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 178", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_178_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20178%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20178%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1031, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1009|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1009|Statewide", "content_hash": "8532ecab32b430b2", "measure_id": "CA1009", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 180", "description": "Park Lands, Historic Sites, Wildlife and Forest Conservation Bond Act. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.90000153, "percent_no": 65.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the ac...", "summary_text": "This initiative would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the acquisition, development, and restoration of parks, historic sites, wildlife habitats, and forest lands in California. The measure proposed spending on conservation projects including land purchases, facility improvements, and environmental restoration programs.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 180", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_180_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20180%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20180%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1030, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1008|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1008|Statewide", "content_hash": "ee8d6d58c560b606", "measure_id": "CA1008", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 179", "description": "Murder: Punishment. Legislative Initiative Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 29.29999924, "percent_no": 70.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1994 California ballot measure was a legislative initiative amendment re...", "summary_text": "This 1994 California ballot measure was a legislative initiative amendment regarding punishment for murder that passed with 29.3% of the vote. Without the specific ballot language, the measure appears to have modified statutory provisions related to murder sentencing or punishment procedures.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 179", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_179_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20179%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20179%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1029, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1007|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1007|Statewide", "content_hash": "7a6bfd38545279e1", "measure_id": "CA1007", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1C", "description": "Higher Education Facilities Bond Act of June 1994.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 26.60000038, "percent_no": 73.39999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund co...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construction and improvement of higher education facilities in California. The measure failed with only 26.6% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1C", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1C_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201C%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201C%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1028, "fingerprint": "1994|CA1006|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1994|CA1006|Statewide", "content_hash": "d5e32a0428aa4670", "measure_id": "CA1006", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1994, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1A", "description": "Earthquake Relief and Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of 1994.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 19.5, "percent_no": 80.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund ea...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund earthquake relief efforts and seismic retrofitting of buildings and infrastructure in California. The bond proceeds would have been used to strengthen structures against earthquake damage and provide disaster relief assistance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1A", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1A_(1994)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201A%201994", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201A%201994", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1027, "fingerprint": "1993|CA1005|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1993|CA1005|Statewide", "content_hash": "f41a9ca03a6fce35", "measure_id": "CA1005", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1993, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 172", "description": "Local Public Safety Protection and Improvement Act of 1993. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.70000076, "percent_no": 42.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1993 constitutional amendment allowed local governments in California to...", "summary_text": "This 1993 constitutional amendment allowed local governments in California to impose special taxes for public safety services with a simple majority vote rather than the two-thirds majority previously required. The measure was designed to make it easier for cities and counties to fund police, fire, and emergency services through local taxation.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 172", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_172_(1993)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20172%201993", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20172%201993", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1026, "fingerprint": "1993|CA1004|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1993|CA1004|Statewide", "content_hash": "072bc92107759e96", "measure_id": "CA1004", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1993, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 171", "description": "Property Taxation. Transfer of Base Year Value. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.70000076, "percent_no": 48.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure amended the California Constitution to allow property own...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure amended the California Constitution to allow property owners to transfer their property tax base year value to a replacement property under certain circumstances, typically when they are over 55 years old or severely disabled. The measure expanded existing property tax relief programs by making it easier for qualifying homeowners to move without facing significantly higher property tax assessments.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 171", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_171_(1993)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20171%201993", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20171%201993", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1025, "fingerprint": "1993|CA1003|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1993|CA1003|Statewide", "content_hash": "43fa4c00f036f388", "measure_id": "CA1003", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1993, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 173", "description": "California Housing and Jobs Investment Bond Act. $185 Million Legislative Bond Act.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.09999847, "percent_no": 57.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue $185 million in bonds t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue $185 million in bonds to fund housing and job creation investments. The bonds would have been repaid through the state's general fund.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 173", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_173_(1993)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20173%201993", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20173%201993", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1024, "fingerprint": "1993|CA1002|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1993|CA1002|Statewide", "content_hash": "7908dbef14d545f3", "measure_id": "CA1002", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1993, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 168", "description": "Low Rent Housing Projects. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.20000076, "percent_no": 59.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1993 California constitutional amendment would have required a two-third...", "summary_text": "This 1993 California constitutional amendment would have required a two-thirds vote of the legislature to approve state funding for low-rent housing projects. The measure failed with 40.2% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 168", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_168_(1993)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20168%201993", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20168%201993", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1023, "fingerprint": "1993|CA1001|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1993|CA1001|Statewide", "content_hash": "5368d7a68d965563", "measure_id": "CA1001", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1993, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 169", "description": "Budget Implementation. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.70000076, "percent_no": 61.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional amendment would have required a two-thirds vote of the Le...", "summary_text": "This constitutional amendment would have required a two-thirds vote of the Legislature to pass the annual state budget, rather than the simple majority that was required at the time. The measure aimed to give minority parties greater influence over budget decisions by making it harder to pass spending plans without broader legislative consensus.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 169", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_169_(1993)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20169%201993", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20169%201993", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1022, "fingerprint": "1993|CA1000|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1993|CA1000|Statewide", "content_hash": "f7faae4584a108fd", "measure_id": "CA1000", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1993, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 170", "description": "Property Taxes. Schools. Development-Fee Limits. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.60000038, "percent_no": 69.39999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to limit developm...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to limit development fees that local governments can charge on new construction and would have changed how property tax revenues are distributed to schools. It also would have required a two-thirds vote of the legislature to increase certain state taxes.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 170", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_170_(1993)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20170%201993", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20170%201993", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1021, "fingerprint": "1993|CA999|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1993|CA999|Statewide", "content_hash": "5b9111ec4118db97", "measure_id": "CA999", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1993, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 174", "description": "Education. Vouchers. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.39999962, "percent_no": 69.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have amended the California Constitution to create a sc...", "summary_text": "This initiative would have amended the California Constitution to create a school voucher system allowing parents to use public education funding toward tuition at private schools of their choice. The measure failed with 30.4% voter approval in 1993.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 174", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_174_(1993)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20174%201993", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20174%201993", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1020, "fingerprint": "1992|CA998|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA998|Statewide", "content_hash": "b080cbd1c807b8b0", "measure_id": "CA998", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 163", "description": "Ends Taxation of Certain Food Products. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.59999847, "percent_no": 33.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure ended state and local sales taxes on certain food products for h...", "summary_text": "This measure ended state and local sales taxes on certain food products for human consumption, excluding items like alcoholic beverages, hot prepared foods, and candy. The initiative required a constitutional amendment and statutory changes to implement the tax exemption.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 163", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_163_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20163%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20163%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1019, "fingerprint": "1992|CA997|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA997|Statewide", "content_hash": "7a2acfdeddc0e6ad", "measure_id": "CA997", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 164", "description": "Congressional Term Limits. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.59999847, "percent_no": 36.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Federal Government | Term Limits\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established term limits for California's members of Congress, li...", "summary_text": "This measure established term limits for California's members of Congress, limiting U.S. House representatives to three terms (6 years) and U.S. Senators to two terms (12 years). The initiative was later struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1995, which ruled that states cannot impose congressional term limits without a constitutional amendment.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 164", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_164_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20164%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20164%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1018, "fingerprint": "1992|CA996|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA996|Statewide", "content_hash": "e7352db4817451c6", "measure_id": "CA996", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 152", "description": "School Facilities Bond Act of 1992", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.90000153, "percent_no": 47.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $2", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $2.45 billion in general obligation bonds to fund construction and renovation of public school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through state taxes over time.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 152", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_152_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20152%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20152%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1017, "fingerprint": "1992|CA995|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA995|Statewide", "content_hash": "746a148ab5ebaf6d", "measure_id": "CA995", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 155", "description": "1992 School Facilities Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.79999924, "percent_no": 48.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The 1992 School Facilities Bond Act authorized the state of California to iss...", "summary_text": "The 1992 School Facilities Bond Act authorized the state of California to issue bonds to fund the construction, renovation, and improvement of public school facilities. The measure provided funding for school districts to address facility needs including new construction, seismic safety upgrades, and modernization of existing buildings.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 155", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_155_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20155%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20155%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1016, "fingerprint": "1992|CA994|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA994|Statewide", "content_hash": "077001c5841ede0b", "measure_id": "CA994", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 160", "description": "Property Tax Exemption. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.59999847, "percent_no": 48.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This legislative constitutional amendment provided a property tax exemption f...", "summary_text": "This legislative constitutional amendment provided a property tax exemption for certain property in California. The measure passed with 51.6% of the vote, adding this exemption to the state constitution.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 160", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_160_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20160%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20160%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1015, "fingerprint": "1992|CA993|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA993|Statewide", "content_hash": "4662aa031c6ea738", "measure_id": "CA993", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 162", "description": "Public Employees' Retirement Systems. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.0, "percent_no": 49.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Local Government | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1992 California constitutional amendment modified the state's public emp...", "summary_text": "This 1992 California constitutional amendment modified the state's public employee retirement systems. The measure passed with 51.0% of the vote, making changes to how public employee pensions are structured and administered in California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 162", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_162_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20162%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20162%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1014, "fingerprint": "1992|CA992|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA992|Statewide", "content_hash": "35ebc4ee8b1d5194", "measure_id": "CA992", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 153", "description": "Higher Education Facilities Bond Act of June 1992", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.79999924, "percent_no": 49.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $900 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $900 million in general obligation bonds to fund construction and renovation of facilities at California's public universities and colleges. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 153", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_153_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20153%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20153%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1013, "fingerprint": "1992|CA991|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA991|Statewide", "content_hash": "db2f6234d52b62f2", "measure_id": "CA991", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 156", "description": "Passenger Rail and Clean Air Bond Act of 1992", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.09999847, "percent_no": 51.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized $1", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized $1.98 billion in general obligation bonds to fund passenger rail transportation projects and clean air programs throughout California. The bonds would have been repaid with interest from the state's General Fund over approximately 20 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 156", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_156_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20156%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20156%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1012, "fingerprint": "1992|CA990|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA990|Statewide", "content_hash": "ab930a0e371323c2", "measure_id": "CA990", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 165", "description": "Budget Process. Welfare. Procedural and Substantive Changes. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.59999847, "percent_no": 53.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed California's budget process to require a two-...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed California's budget process to require a two-thirds legislative vote to increase welfare spending above 1991-92 levels, while allowing budget passage by majority vote instead of the current two-thirds requirement. It also would have established procedural changes including legislative hearings on welfare programs and creation of a state welfare oversight board.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 165", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_165_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20165%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20165%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1011, "fingerprint": "1992|CA989|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA989|Statewide", "content_hash": "dbe1c7c58d9b058b", "measure_id": "CA989", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 161", "description": "Physician-Assisted Death. Terminal Condition. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.90000153, "percent_no": 54.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1992 California initiative would have allowed physicians to assist termi...", "summary_text": "This 1992 California initiative would have allowed physicians to assist terminally ill patients in ending their lives under specified legal conditions. The measure failed with 45.9% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 161", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_161_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20161%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20161%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1010, "fingerprint": "1992|CA988|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA988|Statewide", "content_hash": "d609ce919aa8bc42", "measure_id": "CA988", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 167", "description": "State Taxes. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.20000076, "percent_no": 58.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1992 California ballot measure would have enacted changes to state tax p...", "summary_text": "This 1992 California ballot measure would have enacted changes to state tax policy through an initiative statute. The measure failed with 41.2% support from voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 167", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_167_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20167%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20167%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1009, "fingerprint": "1992|CA987|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA987|Statewide", "content_hash": "3572d4cf69211a58", "measure_id": "CA987", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 159", "description": "Office of the Auditor General. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.0, "percent_no": 59.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have created a constitutional Office of the Auditor Genera...", "summary_text": "This measure would have created a constitutional Office of the Auditor General to conduct independent audits and investigations of state government operations. The office would have been appointed by and reported to the Legislature rather than being part of the executive branch.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 159", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_159_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20159%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20159%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1008, "fingerprint": "1992|CA986|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA986|Statewide", "content_hash": "5b1463db7c907a4f", "measure_id": "CA986", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 158", "description": "Office of California Analyst. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.90000153, "percent_no": 60.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have created an Office of California Analyst as a constitu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have created an Office of California Analyst as a constitutional entity to provide independent analysis of state legislation and policies. The office would have been responsible for conducting nonpartisan research and evaluation of government programs and proposed laws.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 158", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_158_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20158%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20158%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1007, "fingerprint": "1992|CA985|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA985|Statewide", "content_hash": "d8c56fb31f2eab15", "measure_id": "CA985", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 154", "description": "Property Tax Postponement. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.79999924, "percent_no": 60.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed property owners to postpone paying property t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed property owners to postpone paying property taxes until the property is sold or transferred, with the deferred taxes plus interest becoming a lien on the property. It was a legislative constitutional amendment that required voter approval to take effect.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 154", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_154_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20154%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20154%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1006, "fingerprint": "1992|CA984|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA984|Statewide", "content_hash": "427ef45ece54e2ee", "measure_id": "CA984", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 166", "description": "Basic Health Care Coverage. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.79999924, "percent_no": 69.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Health | Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1992 initiative would have established a state-administered basic health...", "summary_text": "This 1992 initiative would have established a state-administered basic health care coverage system in California. The measure would have provided universal health care coverage for all state residents through a single-payer system funded by various taxes and fees.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 166", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_166_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20166%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20166%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1005, "fingerprint": "1992|CA983|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1992|CA983|Statewide", "content_hash": "4928987f4db4fe3c", "measure_id": "CA983", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1992, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 157", "description": "Toll Roads and Highways. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 28.20000076, "percent_no": 71.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to allow the stat...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to allow the state to construct and operate toll roads and highways, giving the legislature authority to establish tolling systems for transportation infrastructure funding.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 157", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_157_(1992)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20157%201992", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20157%201992", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1004, "fingerprint": "1990|CA982|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA982|Statewide", "content_hash": "867f753932da06aa", "measure_id": "CA982", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 113", "description": "Practice Of Chiropractic. Legislative Initiative Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 81.80000305, "percent_no": 18.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1990 California ballot measure amended state law to regulate the practic...", "summary_text": "This 1990 California ballot measure amended state law to regulate the practice of chiropractic medicine and define the scope of services that licensed chiropractors may legally provide. The measure established legislative standards for chiropractic practice within the state's healthcare regulatory framework.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 113", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_113_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20113%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20113%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1003, "fingerprint": "1990|CA981|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA981|Statewide", "content_hash": "80ece7ccd5cb09d1", "measure_id": "CA981", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 110", "description": "Property Tax Exemption For Severely Disabled Persons. Legislative Constitutional Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 80.19999695, "percent_no": 19.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure created a property tax exemption for severely disabled persons i...", "summary_text": "This measure created a property tax exemption for severely disabled persons in California by amending the state constitution. The exemption applies to the homes of qualifying individuals with severe disabilities.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 110", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_110_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20110%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20110%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1002, "fingerprint": "1990|CA980|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA980|Statewide", "content_hash": "d9a7554ac08aee87", "measure_id": "CA980", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 114", "description": "Murder Of A Peace Officer. Criminal Penalties. Special Circumstance. Peace Officer Definition. Legislative Initiative Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.09999847, "percent_no": 28.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure added the murder of a peace officer to the list of special circu...", "summary_text": "This measure added the murder of a peace officer to the list of special circumstances that can make a defendant eligible for the death penalty or life imprisonment without parole. It also expanded the definition of \"peace officer\" to include additional law enforcement personnel beyond police officers.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 114", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_114_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20114%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20114%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1001, "fingerprint": "1990|CA979|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA979|Statewide", "content_hash": "62c90debe83a47d1", "measure_id": "CA979", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 112", "description": "State Officials, Ethics, Salaries. Open Meetings. Legislative Constitutional Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.5, "percent_no": 37.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance | Labor & Employment | Legislatures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established ethics requirements for state officials, regulated t...", "summary_text": "This measure established ethics requirements for state officials, regulated their salaries, and mandated open meetings for legislative proceedings through a constitutional amendment. It passed with 62.5% voter approval in 1990.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 112", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_112_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20112%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20112%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 1000, "fingerprint": "1990|CA978|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA978|Statewide", "content_hash": "4b3be87f88cec406", "measure_id": "CA978", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 127", "description": "Earthquake Safety. Property Tax Exclusion. Legislative Constitutional Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.70000076, "percent_no": 38.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure created a property tax exclusion allowing homeowners to transfer...", "summary_text": "This measure created a property tax exclusion allowing homeowners to transfer their existing property tax assessment to a replacement home of equal or lesser value if their original home was damaged or destroyed in a Governor-declared disaster, such as an earthquake. The exclusion applies when the replacement home is purchased or newly constructed within specified time limits after the disaster.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 127", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_127_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20127%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20127%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 999, "fingerprint": "1990|CA977|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA977|Statewide", "content_hash": "2b883c1972579144", "measure_id": "CA977", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 142", "description": "Veterans' Bond Act of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.0, "percent_no": 41.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 142", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_142_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20142%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20142%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 998, "fingerprint": "1990|CA976|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA976|Statewide", "content_hash": "9e2ed8d0fa9bc36e", "measure_id": "CA976", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 123", "description": "1990 School Facilities Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.5, "percent_no": 42.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $800 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $800 million in general obligation bonds to fund construction and modernization of public school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes over time to address overcrowding and aging infrastructure in California's public schools.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 123", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_123_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20123%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20123%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 997, "fingerprint": "1990|CA975|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA975|Statewide", "content_hash": "7d9ae568308f147f", "measure_id": "CA975", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 115", "description": "Criminal Law. Initiative Constitutional Amendment And Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.0, "percent_no": 43.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended California's constitution and statutes to expand the rig...", "summary_text": "This measure amended California's constitution and statutes to expand the rights of crime victims, including the right to be informed of and participate in criminal proceedings, receive restitution, and have their safety considered in bail and sentencing decisions. It also established that victims' rights should be protected and preserved on an equal basis with the rights of the accused.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 115", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_115_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20115%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20115%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 996, "fingerprint": "1990|CA974|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA974|Statewide", "content_hash": "58a6d2ad052354eb", "measure_id": "CA974", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 108", "description": "Passenger Rail And Clean Air Bond Act Of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.29999924, "percent_no": 43.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized California to issue $1", "summary_text": "This measure authorized California to issue $1.99 billion in general obligation bonds to fund passenger rail transportation projects and clean air programs. The bonds would finance intercity rail improvements, urban rail systems, and air quality enhancement initiatives throughout the state.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 108", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_108_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20108%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20108%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 995, "fingerprint": "1990|CA973|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA973|Statewide", "content_hash": "611dd248a44bfab2", "measure_id": "CA973", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 120", "description": "New Prison Construction Bond Act Of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.0, "percent_no": 44.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $450 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $450 million in general obligation bonds to finance the construction of new state prison facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 120", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_120_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20120%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20120%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 994, "fingerprint": "1990|CA972|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA972|Statewide", "content_hash": "b04c1a952efa8f88", "measure_id": "CA972", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 132", "description": "Marine Resources. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.79999924, "percent_no": 44.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1990 California constitutional amendment established state policies for ...", "summary_text": "This 1990 California constitutional amendment established state policies for protecting marine resources and coastal waters through conservation measures and environmental regulations. The measure created constitutional protections for marine ecosystems and mandated state efforts to preserve ocean and coastal environmental quality.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 132", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_132_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20132%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20132%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 993, "fingerprint": "1990|CA971|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA971|Statewide", "content_hash": "d3fdf41d93228ec9", "measure_id": "CA971", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 109", "description": "Governor's Review Of Legislation. Legislative Deadlines. Legislative Constitutional Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.40000153, "percent_no": 44.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure gave the Governor additional time to review legislation by exten...", "summary_text": "This measure gave the Governor additional time to review legislation by extending the period before bills automatically become law without the Governor's signature, and established earlier deadlines for the Legislature to pass bills and send them to the Governor. It aimed to provide more time for gubernatorial review while ensuring the Legislature completes its work earlier in the session.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 109", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_109_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20109%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20109%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 992, "fingerprint": "1990|CA970|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA970|Statewide", "content_hash": "ed395a236152a863", "measure_id": "CA970", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 121", "description": "Higher Education Facilities Bond Act Of June 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.0, "percent_no": 45.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the state to sell $450 million in general obligation b...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the state to sell $450 million in general obligation bonds to fund construction, renovation, and equipment purchases for California's public universities and community colleges. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 121", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_121_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20121%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20121%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 991, "fingerprint": "1990|CA969|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA969|Statewide", "content_hash": "e78acd304bd02e4e", "measure_id": "CA969", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 122", "description": "Earthquake Safety And Public Buildings Rehabilitation Bond Act Of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.0, "percent_no": 45.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $300 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $300 million in general obligation bonds to fund seismic safety improvements and rehabilitation of public buildings, including schools, hospitals, and emergency services facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 122", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_122_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20122%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20122%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 990, "fingerprint": "1990|CA968|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA968|Statewide", "content_hash": "a6b17d57cefe24f4", "measure_id": "CA968", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 139", "description": "Prison Inmate Labor. Tax Credit. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.09999847, "percent_no": 45.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Labor & Employment | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a constitutional requirement for California prison i...", "summary_text": "This measure established a constitutional requirement for California prison inmates to work and created a tax credit for private businesses that employ prison labor or hire recently released inmates. It also authorized the use of inmate labor for public works projects and private industry partnerships within correctional facilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 139", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_139_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20139%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20139%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 989, "fingerprint": "1990|CA967|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA967|Statewide", "content_hash": "0fd77c0548fa1edb", "measure_id": "CA967", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 116", "description": "Rail Transportation. Bond Act. Initiative Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.29999924, "percent_no": 46.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative statute authorized the state to issue bonds for rail transpor...", "summary_text": "This initiative statute authorized the state to issue bonds for rail transportation projects, including commuter rail systems and improvements to existing rail infrastructure. The measure provided funding mechanisms for developing and expanding California's rail transportation network through state-backed bond financing.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 116", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_116_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20116%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20116%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 988, "fingerprint": "1990|CA966|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA966|Statewide", "content_hash": "6958a66ef12db1bd", "measure_id": "CA966", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 117", "description": "Wildlife Protection. Initiative Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.40000153, "percent_no": 47.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Budgets | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1990 California initiative statute established regulations to protect wi...", "summary_text": "This 1990 California initiative statute established regulations to protect wildlife through various conservation measures. The measure passed with 52.4% voter approval, implementing new statutory protections for wildlife species in the state.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 117", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_117_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20117%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20117%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 987, "fingerprint": "1990|CA965|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA965|Statewide", "content_hash": "d98b73c7f380240a", "measure_id": "CA965", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 111", "description": "The Traffic Congestion Relief And Spending Limitation Act Of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.40000153, "percent_no": 47.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1990 California ballot measure established limits on government spending...", "summary_text": "This 1990 California ballot measure established limits on government spending while directing funds toward traffic congestion relief projects. It passed with 52.4% of the vote, creating both spending restrictions and dedicated transportation infrastructure funding.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 111", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_111_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20111%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20111%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 986, "fingerprint": "1990|CA964|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA964|Statewide", "content_hash": "69126e7450b50093", "measure_id": "CA964", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 107", "description": "Housing And Homeless Bond Act Of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.40000153, "percent_no": 47.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The Housing And Homeless Bond Act Of 1990 authorized the state to issue bonds...", "summary_text": "The Housing And Homeless Bond Act Of 1990 authorized the state to issue bonds to fund housing programs and services for homeless individuals and families. The measure provided funding for affordable housing development, emergency shelters, and supportive services to address homelessness in California.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 107", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_107_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20107%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20107%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 985, "fingerprint": "1990|CA963|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA963|Statewide", "content_hash": "5e2e58403df9ec8f", "measure_id": "CA963", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 140", "description": "Limits on Terms of Office. Legislators' Retirement. Legislative Operating Costs. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.20000076, "percent_no": 47.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures | State Government | Term Limits\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1990 California constitutional amendment established term limits for sta...", "summary_text": "This 1990 California constitutional amendment established term limits for state legislators, modified legislative retirement benefits, and implemented controls on legislative operating expenses.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 140", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_140_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20140%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20140%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 984, "fingerprint": "1990|CA962|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA962|Statewide", "content_hash": "74b1949abbbb5abb", "measure_id": "CA962", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 146", "description": "School Facilities Bond Act of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.79999924, "percent_no": 48.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The School Facilities Bond Act of 1990 authorized the state to issue $800 mil...", "summary_text": "The School Facilities Bond Act of 1990 authorized the state to issue $800 million in general obligation bonds to fund construction and renovation of public school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through property taxes over approximately 20 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 146", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_146_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20146%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20146%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 983, "fingerprint": "1990|CA961|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA961|Statewide", "content_hash": "7c85b07b74f76612", "measure_id": "CA961", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 143", "description": "Higher Education Facilities Bond Act of November 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.79999924, "percent_no": 51.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue $450 million in general...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue $450 million in general obligation bonds to fund construction and renovation of facilities at California's public universities and community colleges. The bonds would have been repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 143", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_143_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20143%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20143%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 982, "fingerprint": "1990|CA960|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA960|Statewide", "content_hash": "692189ca1a2b8bdd", "measure_id": "CA960", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 141", "description": "Toxic Chemical Discharge. Public Agencies. Legislative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.5, "percent_no": 51.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited the discharge of chemicals known to cause ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited the discharge of chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm into sources of drinking water, and required public agencies to use the least toxic methods available when purchasing products or services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 141", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_141_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20141%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20141%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 981, "fingerprint": "1990|CA959|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA959|Statewide", "content_hash": "3b4c18c4be9c222f", "measure_id": "CA959", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 136", "description": "State, Local Taxation. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.90000153, "percent_no": 52.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Legislatures | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1990 California constitutional amendment would have required voter appro...", "summary_text": "This 1990 California constitutional amendment would have required voter approval for any new state or local taxes, tax increases, or extensions of existing taxes. The measure aimed to give voters direct control over taxation decisions made by state and local governments.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 136", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_136_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20136%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20136%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 980, "fingerprint": "1990|CA958|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA958|Statewide", "content_hash": "5802c86c1996e53f", "measure_id": "CA958", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 130", "description": "Forest Acquisition. Timber Harvesting Practices. Bond Act. Initiative Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.90000153, "percent_no": 52.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Business & Commerce | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1990 California ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue ...", "summary_text": "This 1990 California ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to acquire forest lands and would have established new regulations governing timber harvesting practices. The initiative combined forest preservation through public acquisition with stricter controls on logging operations on private lands.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 130", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_130_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20130%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20130%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 979, "fingerprint": "1990|CA957|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA957|Statewide", "content_hash": "739f37aa351e4c2f", "measure_id": "CA957", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 151", "description": "Child Care Facilities Financing Act of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.5, "percent_no": 52.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12 | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have authorized California to issue general obligat...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have authorized California to issue general obligation bonds to finance the construction, renovation, and equipping of child care facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through the state's general fund, requiring taxpayer funding for debt service.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 151", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_151_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20151%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20151%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 978, "fingerprint": "1990|CA956|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA956|Statewide", "content_hash": "753eee46fa83de3f", "measure_id": "CA956", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 149", "description": "California Park, Recreation, and Wildlife Enhancement Act of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.09999847, "percent_no": 52.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue $742 million in general...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue $742 million in general obligation bonds to fund acquisition and development of state and local parks, beaches, recreational facilities, and wildlife habitat areas. The bonds would have been repaid through the state's General Fund over approximately 20 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 149", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_149_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20149%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20149%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 977, "fingerprint": "1990|CA955|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA955|Statewide", "content_hash": "12d4d947eac65dff", "measure_id": "CA955", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 124", "description": "Local Hospital Districts. Legislative Constitutional Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.79999924, "percent_no": 54.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed local hospital districts to be created or reo...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed local hospital districts to be created or reorganized through local legislative processes rather than requiring state-level approval. It would have given these districts authority to operate hospitals and provide healthcare services within their boundaries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 124", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_124_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20124%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20124%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 976, "fingerprint": "1990|CA954|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA954|Statewide", "content_hash": "4b8664a14f228dca", "measure_id": "CA954", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 125", "description": "Motor Vehicle Tax. Rail Transit Funding. Legislative Constitutional Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.59999847, "percent_no": 54.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have increased motor vehicle taxes and fees to fund rail t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have increased motor vehicle taxes and fees to fund rail transit projects and transportation infrastructure throughout California. The additional revenue would have been constitutionally dedicated to developing and expanding rail transit systems statewide.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 125", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_125_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20125%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20125%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 975, "fingerprint": "1990|CA953|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA953|Statewide", "content_hash": "e09594d884513c87", "measure_id": "CA953", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 137", "description": "Initiative and Referendum Process. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.0, "percent_no": 55.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to change the ini...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to change the initiative and referendum process, though the specific details of the proposed changes are not provided in the ballot text summary.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 137", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_137_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20137%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20137%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 974, "fingerprint": "1990|CA952|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA952|Statewide", "content_hash": "c0301f168203e2e4", "measure_id": "CA952", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 145", "description": "California Housing Bond Act of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.5, "percent_no": 55.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue $1", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue $1.95 billion in general obligation bonds to fund various housing programs, including assistance for first-time homebuyers, rehabilitation of existing housing, and development of affordable housing units. The bonds would have been repaid through the state's general fund over approximately 20 years.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 145", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_145_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20145%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20145%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 973, "fingerprint": "1990|CA951|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA951|Statewide", "content_hash": "132e3bce81116962", "measure_id": "CA951", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 148", "description": "Water Resources Bond Act of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.79999924, "percent_no": 56.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized California to issue $1", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized California to issue $1.99 billion in general obligation bonds to fund water supply, quality, and conservation projects throughout the state. The bond proceeds would have been allocated to various water infrastructure improvements, including storage facilities, water treatment systems, and conservation programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 148", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_148_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20148%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20148%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 972, "fingerprint": "1990|CA950|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA950|Statewide", "content_hash": "8f896b4626cca9b7", "measure_id": "CA950", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 126", "description": "Alcoholic Beverages. Taxes. Legislative Constitutional Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.90000153, "percent_no": 59.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1990 California ballot measure would have amended the state constitution...", "summary_text": "This 1990 California ballot measure would have amended the state constitution to change taxes on alcoholic beverages. The measure failed with 40.9% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 126", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_126_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20126%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20126%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 971, "fingerprint": "1990|CA949|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA949|Statewide", "content_hash": "deda8ab6fc63cd18", "measure_id": "CA949", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 144", "description": "New Prison Construction Bond Act of 1990-B", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.40000153, "percent_no": 59.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue $450 million in general...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue $450 million in general obligation bonds to finance the construction of new state prison facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 144", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_144_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20144%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20144%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 970, "fingerprint": "1990|CA948|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA948|Statewide", "content_hash": "18085d2e5fa4cf02", "measure_id": "CA948", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 133", "description": "Drug Enforcement and Prevention. Taxes. Prison Terms. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.90000153, "percent_no": 62.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have authorized special taxes to fund drug enforcement ...", "summary_text": "This initiative would have authorized special taxes to fund drug enforcement and prevention programs, and established mandatory prison terms for certain drug offenses. The measure failed with only 37.9% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 133", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_133_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20133%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20133%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 969, "fingerprint": "1990|CA947|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA947|Statewide", "content_hash": "94a84e6577dd02a0", "measure_id": "CA947", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 131", "description": "Limits on Terms of Office. Ethics. Campaign Financing. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.79999924, "percent_no": 62.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance | Legislatures | State Government | Term Limits\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed term limits on California legislators and mem...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed term limits on California legislators and members of Congress, established ethics requirements for public officials, and implemented campaign finance reforms including contribution limits and public financing options.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 131", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_131_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20131%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20131%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 968, "fingerprint": "1990|CA946|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA946|Statewide", "content_hash": "28faf635a95bea0a", "measure_id": "CA946", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 147", "description": "County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure and Juvenile Facility Bond Act of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.29999924, "percent_no": 62.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice | Juvenile Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the co...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the construction and improvement of county correctional facilities and juvenile detention facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through the state's general fund over time.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 147", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_147_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20147%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20147%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 967, "fingerprint": "1990|CA945|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA945|Statewide", "content_hash": "e0517e23a1dfc68b", "measure_id": "CA945", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 119", "description": "Reapportionment By Commission. Initiative. Constitutional Amendment And Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.20000076, "percent_no": 63.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have created an independent commission to draw legislative...", "summary_text": "This measure would have created an independent commission to draw legislative and congressional district boundaries instead of having the legislature perform redistricting. The commission would have consisted of retired judges appointed through a process involving the state's appellate courts.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 119", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_119_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20119%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20119%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 966, "fingerprint": "1990|CA944|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA944|Statewide", "content_hash": "00bec0b8fad122c8", "measure_id": "CA944", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 128", "description": "Environment. Public Health. Bonds. Initiative Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.70000076, "percent_no": 64.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1990 California ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue ...", "summary_text": "This 1990 California ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund environmental and public health programs. The measure failed with 35.7% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 128", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_128_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20128%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20128%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 965, "fingerprint": "1990|CA943|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA943|Statewide", "content_hash": "cef376d32b551d43", "measure_id": "CA943", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 118", "description": "Legislature. Reapportionment. Ethics. Initiative Constitutional Amendment And Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 33.0, "percent_no": 67.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance | Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have established an independent citizens commission...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have established an independent citizens commission to draw legislative and congressional district boundaries in California and created ethics rules for legislators including restrictions on gifts and lobbying activities. It also would have implemented term limits for state lawmakers and members of Congress representing California.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 118", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_118_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20118%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20118%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 964, "fingerprint": "1990|CA942|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA942|Statewide", "content_hash": "c0df3fd982df8908", "measure_id": "CA942", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 134", "description": "Alcohol Surtax. Constitutional Amendment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.0, "percent_no": 69.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1990 California ballot measure would have amended the state constitution...", "summary_text": "This 1990 California ballot measure would have amended the state constitution to impose an additional tax on alcoholic beverages beyond existing taxes. The measure failed with 31% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 134", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_134_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20134%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20134%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 963, "fingerprint": "1990|CA941|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA941|Statewide", "content_hash": "8e62f3b138b3b9eb", "measure_id": "CA941", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 135", "description": "Pesticide Regulation. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.39999962, "percent_no": 69.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Business & Commerce | Environmental Protection | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have regulated pesticide use in California by requiring...", "summary_text": "This initiative would have regulated pesticide use in California by requiring disclosure of pesticide applications, establishing buffer zones around schools and other sensitive areas, and creating new restrictions on certain chemicals. The measure also would have created a new state agency to oversee pesticide regulation and enforcement.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 135", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_135_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20135%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20135%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 962, "fingerprint": "1990|CA940|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA940|Statewide", "content_hash": "bcbcfc5e78131f51", "measure_id": "CA940", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 138", "description": "Forestry Programs. Timber Harvesting Practices. Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 28.79999924, "percent_no": 71.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Business & Commerce | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have established new regulations for timber harvesting ...", "summary_text": "This initiative would have established new regulations for timber harvesting practices in California and created additional forestry programs. The measure aimed to modify existing laws governing how timber companies conduct logging operations on private and public lands.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 138", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_138_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20138%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20138%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 961, "fingerprint": "1990|CA939|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA939|Statewide", "content_hash": "ca0d73bd628d4435", "measure_id": "CA939", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 129", "description": "Drug Enforcement, Prevention, Treatment, Prisons. Bonds. Initiative Constitutional Amendment And Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.60000038, "percent_no": 72.39999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1990 California ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue ...", "summary_text": "This 1990 California ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund drug enforcement, prevention, treatment programs, and prison construction. The initiative proposed both constitutional amendments and statutory changes to finance these drug-related criminal justice and public health programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 129", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_129_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20129%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20129%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 960, "fingerprint": "1990|CA938|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1990|CA938|Statewide", "content_hash": "bded155d5f4ce33d", "measure_id": "CA938", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1990, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 150", "description": "County Courthouse Facility Capital Expenditure Bond Act of 1990", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 26.39999962, "percent_no": 73.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Judiciary | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund capital e...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund capital expenditures for county courthouse facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through the state's general fund revenues.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1990, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 150", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_150_(1990)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20150%201990", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20150%201990", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 959, "fingerprint": "1988|CA937|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA937|Statewide", "content_hash": "7e824c8031596570", "measure_id": "CA937", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 67", "description": "Second Degree Murder Of Peace Officer. Minimum Term.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 82.09999847, "percent_no": 17.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a minimum sentence term for the crime of second-degr...", "summary_text": "This measure established a minimum sentence term for the crime of second-degree murder when the victim is a peace officer. It passed in 1988 with 82.1% voter approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 67", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_67_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2067%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2067%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 958, "fingerprint": "1988|CA936|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA936|Statewide", "content_hash": "9d9de0992b3bfa2c", "measure_id": "CA936", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 88", "description": "Deposit Of Public Moneys.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.80000305, "percent_no": 25.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 88", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_88_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2088%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2088%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 957, "fingerprint": "1988|CA935|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA935|Statewide", "content_hash": "3fccb635a14d3b24", "measure_id": "CA935", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 92", "description": "Commission On Judicial Performance.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.19999695, "percent_no": 25.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure created the Commission on Judicial Performance to investigate co...", "summary_text": "This measure created the Commission on Judicial Performance to investigate complaints against judges and recommend disciplinary actions including removal from office. The commission would be composed of judges, attorneys, and public members appointed by various state officials.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 92", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_92_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2092%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2092%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 956, "fingerprint": "1988|CA934|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA934|Statewide", "content_hash": "95d9fcf6b97c8d40", "measure_id": "CA934", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 66", "description": "Elected County Assessor", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.5, "percent_no": 26.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 66", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_66_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2066%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2066%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 955, "fingerprint": "1988|CA933|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA933|Statewide", "content_hash": "851d9e04385395d4", "measure_id": "CA933", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 81", "description": "California Safe Drinking Water Bond Act Of 1988", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.69999695, "percent_no": 28.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $2", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $2.4 billion in general obligation bonds to fund water supply, water quality, and water conservation projects throughout California. The bonds would finance infrastructure improvements including water treatment facilities, distribution systems, and programs to ensure safe drinking water for communities statewide.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 81", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_81_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2081%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2081%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 954, "fingerprint": "1988|CA932|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA932|Statewide", "content_hash": "a87ee55bd711e0c0", "measure_id": "CA932", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 93", "description": "Veteran's Property Tax Exemption.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.80000305, "percent_no": 29.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure provided a property tax exemption for veterans in California", "summary_text": "This measure provided a property tax exemption for veterans in California. It amended the state constitution to allow qualifying veterans to receive reduced property tax assessments on their primary residences.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 93", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_93_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2093%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2093%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 953, "fingerprint": "1988|CA931|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA931|Statewide", "content_hash": "2fd6213accfbfa59", "measure_id": "CA931", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 91", "description": "Justice Courts. Eligibility.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.59999847, "percent_no": 29.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 91", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_91_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2091%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2091%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 952, "fingerprint": "1988|CA930|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA930|Statewide", "content_hash": "b5fabea895818e5b", "measure_id": "CA930", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 90", "description": "Assessed Valuation. Replacement Dwellings.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.09999847, "percent_no": 30.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows property owners to transfer the assessed value of their c...", "summary_text": "This measure allows property owners to transfer the assessed value of their current home to a replacement home of equal or lesser value within the same county, and permits counties to extend this benefit to homes purchased in other participating counties.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 90", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_90_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2090%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2090%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 951, "fingerprint": "1988|CA929|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA929|Statewide", "content_hash": "9538b1fad76c2e88", "measure_id": "CA929", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 87", "description": "Property Tax Revenues. Redevelopment Agencies.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.90000153, "percent_no": 32.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure requires redevelopment agencies to allocate a portion of their p...", "summary_text": "This measure requires redevelopment agencies to allocate a portion of their property tax increment revenues to school districts and other local jurisdictions that would have received those funds if redevelopment had not occurred.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 87", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_87_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2087%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2087%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 950, "fingerprint": "1988|CA928|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA928|Statewide", "content_hash": "89751e2c73a8627b", "measure_id": "CA928", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 76", "description": "Veterans Bond Act Of 1988", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.59999847, "percent_no": 32.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 76", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_76_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2076%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2076%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 949, "fingerprint": "1988|CA927|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA927|Statewide", "content_hash": "74f8f7f268c02aa5", "measure_id": "CA927", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 70", "description": "Wildlife, Coastal, And Park Land Conservation Bond Act.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.09999847, "percent_no": 34.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the acquisiti...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the acquisition and development of wildlife habitats, coastal areas, and park lands for conservation purposes. The measure passed with 65.1% of voters approving the bond funding for these land conservation projects.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 70", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_70_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2070%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2070%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 948, "fingerprint": "1988|CA926|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA926|Statewide", "content_hash": "37c5412f2ea77e59", "measure_id": "CA926", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 94", "description": "Judges.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.09999847, "percent_no": 34.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 94", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_94_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2094%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2094%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 947, "fingerprint": "1988|CA925|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA925|Statewide", "content_hash": "d82be017af672f26", "measure_id": "CA925", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 75", "description": "School Facilities Bond Act Of 1988", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.0, "percent_no": 35.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the state to issue $800 million in general obligation ...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the state to issue $800 million in general obligation bonds to fund construction and renovation of public school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through state tax revenues over time.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 75", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_75_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2075%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2075%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 946, "fingerprint": "1988|CA924|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA924|Statewide", "content_hash": "2b33fe9895be9898", "measure_id": "CA924", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 83", "description": "Clean Water And Water Reclamation Bond Act Of 1988", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.40000153, "percent_no": 35.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The Clean Water And Water Reclamation Bond Act of 1988 authorized the state t...", "summary_text": "The Clean Water And Water Reclamation Bond Act of 1988 authorized the state to issue bonds to fund water quality improvement and water reclamation projects throughout California. The measure provided financing for infrastructure related to clean water treatment and water recycling initiatives.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 83", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_83_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2083%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2083%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 945, "fingerprint": "1988|CA923|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA923|Statewide", "content_hash": "6cfeb8cde0daea01", "measure_id": "CA923", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 82", "description": "Water Conservation Bond Law Of 1988", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.40000153, "percent_no": 37.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1988 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fu...", "summary_text": "This 1988 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund water conservation projects and infrastructure. The measure passed with 62.4% voter approval, providing financing for water-related improvements statewide.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 82", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_82_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2082%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2082%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 944, "fingerprint": "1988|CA922|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA922|Statewide", "content_hash": "35e6c6646adf5478", "measure_id": "CA922", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 96", "description": "Communicable Disease Tests.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.40000153, "percent_no": 37.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Juvenile Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 96", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_96_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2096%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2096%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 943, "fingerprint": "1988|CA921|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA921|Statewide", "content_hash": "e5ca6c126568d961", "measure_id": "CA921", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 79", "description": "1988 School Facilities Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.20000076, "percent_no": 38.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue $800 million in general obl...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue $800 million in general obligation bonds to fund construction and renovation of public school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through state taxes over time to address overcrowding and facility needs in California's public schools.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 79", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_79_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2079%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2079%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 942, "fingerprint": "1988|CA920|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA920|Statewide", "content_hash": "fceec49f2dca2dc5", "measure_id": "CA920", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 80", "description": "New Prison Construction Bond Act Of 1988", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.09999847, "percent_no": 38.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice | Juvenile Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in general obligation bonds to finance the construction of new state prison facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's General Fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 80", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_80_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2080%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2080%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 941, "fingerprint": "1988|CA919|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA919|Statewide", "content_hash": "009f30ab78f1027f", "measure_id": "CA919", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 84", "description": "Housing And Homeless Bond Act Of 1988", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.20000076, "percent_no": 41.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in general obligation bonds to fund housing programs for low and moderate-income families and homeless individuals. The bonds would finance the construction, rehabilitation, and acquisition of affordable housing units and emergency shelters throughout California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 84", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_84_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2084%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2084%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 940, "fingerprint": "1988|CA918|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA918|Statewide", "content_hash": "5e328524686d1e41", "measure_id": "CA918", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 99", "description": "Cigarette and Tobacco Tax. Benefit Fund. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.20000076, "percent_no": 41.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Health | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1988 California ballot measure increased taxes on cigarettes and tobacco...", "summary_text": "This 1988 California ballot measure increased taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products and established a fund to use the revenue for specified public health and education programs. The measure passed with 58.2% voter approval, creating a dedicated funding stream from tobacco tax revenues.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 99", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_99_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2099%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2099%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 939, "fingerprint": "1988|CA917|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA917|Statewide", "content_hash": "5173e74d2a0bb81e", "measure_id": "CA917", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 73", "description": "Campaign Funding. Contribution Limits. Prohibition Of Public Funding.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.09999847, "percent_no": 41.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established contribution limits for California political campaig...", "summary_text": "This measure established contribution limits for California political campaigns and prohibited the use of public funds for candidate campaigns.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 73", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_73_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2073%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2073%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 938, "fingerprint": "1988|CA916|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA916|Statewide", "content_hash": "2c7764a48c7c5014", "measure_id": "CA916", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 78", "description": "Higher Education Facilities Bond Act Of 1988", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.70000076, "percent_no": 42.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue $450 million in general obl...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue $450 million in general obligation bonds to fund construction and improvement of facilities at California's public universities and colleges. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 78", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_78_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2078%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2078%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 937, "fingerprint": "1988|CA915|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA915|Statewide", "content_hash": "66a23f34c5c4b035", "measure_id": "CA915", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 77", "description": "California Earthquake Safety And Housing Rehabilitation Bond Act Of 1988", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.09999847, "percent_no": 43.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1988 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fu...", "summary_text": "This 1988 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund earthquake safety improvements and housing rehabilitation programs. The measure passed with 56.1% voter approval, allowing the state to finance seismic retrofitting and housing improvement projects through bond financing.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 77", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_77_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2077%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2077%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 936, "fingerprint": "1988|CA914|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA914|Statewide", "content_hash": "3f502efa63538021", "measure_id": "CA914", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 89", "description": "Governor's Parole Review.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.0, "percent_no": 45.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 89", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_89_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2089%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2089%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 935, "fingerprint": "1988|CA913|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA913|Statewide", "content_hash": "3f9ab35f89aa8a87", "measure_id": "CA913", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 86", "description": "County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure And Youth Facility Bond Act Of 1988", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.79999924, "percent_no": 45.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in bonds to finance t...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in bonds to finance the construction and improvement of county correctional facilities and youth detention facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's General Fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 86", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_86_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2086%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2086%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 934, "fingerprint": "1988|CA912|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA912|Statewide", "content_hash": "88a9d1475139b525", "measure_id": "CA912", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 105", "description": "Disclosures To Consumers, Voter, Investors.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.5, "percent_no": 45.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Environmental Protection | Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance | Health | Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure required enhanced disclosure requirements for consumers, ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure required enhanced disclosure requirements for consumers, voters, and investors in California. It mandated that certain entities provide more detailed information to these groups about products, political activities, or investment opportunities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 105", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_105_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20105%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20105%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 933, "fingerprint": "1988|CA911|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA911|Statewide", "content_hash": "470a4351f54ae921", "measure_id": "CA911", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 97", "description": "State Occupational Safety And Health Plan.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.70000076, "percent_no": 46.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Health | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure established California's state occupational safety and he...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure established California's state occupational safety and health plan to regulate workplace safety and health standards. The measure allowed California to implement and enforce its own workplace safety regulations rather than relying solely on federal OSHA standards.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 97", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_97_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2097%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2097%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 932, "fingerprint": "1988|CA910|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA910|Statewide", "content_hash": "7e5f93dcde770ab2", "measure_id": "CA910", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 68", "description": "Legislative Campaigns. Spending and Contribution Limits. Partial Public Funding.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.79999924, "percent_no": 47.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1988 California ballot measure established spending and contribution lim...", "summary_text": "This 1988 California ballot measure established spending and contribution limits for state legislative campaigns and provided partial public funding for qualifying candidates. The measure passed with 52.8% of the vote, implementing campaign finance reforms for state legislature races.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 68", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_68_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2068%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2068%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 931, "fingerprint": "1988|CA909|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA909|Statewide", "content_hash": "b9313fbfb8c00b31", "measure_id": "CA909", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 85", "description": "Library Construction And Renovation Bond Act Of 1988", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.70000076, "percent_no": 47.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Bond Measures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $75 million in general obligation ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $75 million in general obligation bonds to fund construction and renovation of public library facilities throughout California. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 85", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_85_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2085%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2085%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 930, "fingerprint": "1988|CA908|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA908|Statewide", "content_hash": "60a3549586c13605", "measure_id": "CA908", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 103", "description": "Insurance Rates, Regulation, Commissioner.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.09999847, "percent_no": 48.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established state regulation of property and casualty insurance ...", "summary_text": "This measure established state regulation of property and casualty insurance rates, requiring prior approval for rate increases and allowing the Insurance Commissioner to reject excessive rates. It also made the Insurance Commissioner an elected rather than appointed position and provided for consumer refunds when rates were found to be excessive.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 103", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_103_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20103%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20103%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 929, "fingerprint": "1988|CA907|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA907|Statewide", "content_hash": "0eaea22d810dedb3", "measure_id": "CA907", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 98", "description": "School Funding.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.70000076, "percent_no": 49.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 98", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_98_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2098%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2098%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 928, "fingerprint": "1988|CA906|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA906|Statewide", "content_hash": "c739e9d2ebfe05db", "measure_id": "CA906", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 74", "description": "Deddeh Transportation Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.99000168, "percent_no": 50.00999832, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 74", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_74_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2074%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2074%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 927, "fingerprint": "1988|CA905|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA905|Statewide", "content_hash": "07197124dfb90e3d", "measure_id": "CA905", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 71", "description": "Appropriations Limit Adjustment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.90000153, "percent_no": 51.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have adjusted California's state spending limit to allow f...", "summary_text": "This measure would have adjusted California's state spending limit to allow for higher appropriations than permitted under the existing constitutional restrictions. The measure failed with 48.9% of voters supporting the change.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 71", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_71_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2071%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2071%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 926, "fingerprint": "1988|CA904|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA904|Statewide", "content_hash": "2cb3d73f083fb266", "measure_id": "CA904", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 106", "description": "Attorney Fees Limit For Tort Claims.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.90000153, "percent_no": 53.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have limited attorney fees in tort claims (personal injury...", "summary_text": "This measure would have limited attorney fees in tort claims (personal injury and similar lawsuits) in California. The specific fee structure or caps that would have been implemented are not detailed in the provided ballot text.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 106", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_106_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20106%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20106%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 925, "fingerprint": "1988|CA903|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA903|Statewide", "content_hash": "a518b1549f75089f", "measure_id": "CA903", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 95", "description": "Hunger And Homelessness Funding.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.20000076, "percent_no": 54.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have provided funding for programs to address hunger and h...", "summary_text": "This measure would have provided funding for programs to address hunger and homelessness in California. The ballot text does not specify the funding source or amount, only that it would direct resources toward these social issues.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 95", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_95_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2095%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2095%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 924, "fingerprint": "1988|CA902|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA902|Statewide", "content_hash": "f0c5d814e3421a84", "measure_id": "CA902", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 100", "description": "Insurance Rates, Regulation.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.90000153, "percent_no": 59.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 100", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_100_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20100%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20100%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 923, "fingerprint": "1988|CA901|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA901|Statewide", "content_hash": "bcbb94d43a830f71", "measure_id": "CA901", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 72", "description": "Emergency Reserve. Dedication Of Certain Taxes To Transportation. Appropriation Limit Change.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.5, "percent_no": 61.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required the state to maintain an emergency reserve f...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required the state to maintain an emergency reserve fund equal to 5% of the General Fund and dedicated certain existing taxes exclusively to transportation purposes. It also would have changed the state's constitutional spending limit to accommodate these requirements.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 72", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_72_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2072%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2072%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 922, "fingerprint": "1988|CA900|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA900|Statewide", "content_hash": "21cb19bd03e5a067", "measure_id": "CA900", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 102", "description": "Reporting Exposure To Aids Virus.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.40000153, "percent_no": 65.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | Insurance | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required reporting of individuals exposed to the AIDS...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required reporting of individuals exposed to the AIDS virus to state health authorities. It would have established procedures for tracking and monitoring people who tested positive for HIV or were exposed to the virus.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 102", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_102_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20102%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20102%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 921, "fingerprint": "1988|CA899|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA899|Statewide", "content_hash": "83ef9636753657a3", "measure_id": "CA899", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 69", "description": "Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome -- AIDS.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.0, "percent_no": 68.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1988 California ballot measure would have required reporting of AIDS cas...", "summary_text": "This 1988 California ballot measure would have required reporting of AIDS cases to health authorities and mandated testing in certain circumstances, while also restricting some activities of people with AIDS. The measure failed with 32% voter support.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 69", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_69_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2069%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2069%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 920, "fingerprint": "1988|CA898|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA898|Statewide", "content_hash": "58fbc87baf7345d5", "measure_id": "CA898", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 104", "description": "Automobile And Other Insurance.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 25.39999962, "percent_no": 74.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have regulated automobile and other forms of insura...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have regulated automobile and other forms of insurance in California, though the specific provisions are not detailed in the provided ballot text. The measure failed with only 25.4% of voters supporting it in 1988.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 104", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_104_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20104%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20104%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 919, "fingerprint": "1988|CA897|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1988|CA897|Statewide", "content_hash": "492c2bee41293f4c", "measure_id": "CA897", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1988, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 101", "description": "Automobile Accident Claims And Insurance Rates.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 13.30000019, "percent_no": 86.69999981, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have implemented changes to automobile accident claims pro...", "summary_text": "This measure would have implemented changes to automobile accident claims procedures and insurance rate regulations in California. The specific details of the proposed modifications to claims handling and rate-setting mechanisms are not provided in the available ballot text.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 101", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_101_(1988)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20101%201988", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20101%201988", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 918, "fingerprint": "1986|CA896|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA896|Statewide", "content_hash": "6ccfb4de02a8e3e5", "measure_id": "CA896", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 48", "description": "Legislators' And Judges' Retirement Systems.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 85.09999847, "percent_no": 14.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary | Labor & Employment | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure addressed the retirement systems for California legislators and ...", "summary_text": "This measure addressed the retirement systems for California legislators and judges, likely making changes to their pension or retirement benefit structures. The measure passed with overwhelming support from voters in 1986.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 48", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_48_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2048%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2048%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 917, "fingerprint": "1986|CA895|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA895|Statewide", "content_hash": "5f3d1d1a7c0ff8d0", "measure_id": "CA895", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 59", "description": "Elected District Attorney", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 82.30000305, "percent_no": 17.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 59", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_59_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2059%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2059%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 916, "fingerprint": "1986|CA894|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA894|Statewide", "content_hash": "401d451b79791b3b", "measure_id": "CA894", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 47", "description": "Allocation Of Vehicle License Fee Taxes To Counties And Cities.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 81.80000305, "percent_no": 18.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allocated vehicle license fee taxes to counties and cities in Ca...", "summary_text": "This measure allocated vehicle license fee taxes to counties and cities in California. It passed in 1986 with 81.8% voter approval, redistributing this revenue source to local governments.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 47", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_47_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2047%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2047%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 915, "fingerprint": "1986|CA893|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA893|Statewide", "content_hash": "96ea50422cbf8c5e", "measure_id": "CA893", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 55", "description": "California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law Of 1986", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 78.69999695, "percent_no": 21.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue $100 million in general obl...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue $100 million in general obligation bonds to fund water quality improvement projects, including treatment facilities and infrastructure to ensure safe drinking water. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 55", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_55_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2055%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2055%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 914, "fingerprint": "1986|CA892|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA892|Statewide", "content_hash": "b7dfc1ec5113ff59", "measure_id": "CA892", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 60", "description": "Taxation. Replacement Residences", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 77.0, "percent_no": 23.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allows homeowners age 55 or older to transfer their current prop...", "summary_text": "This measure allows homeowners age 55 or older to transfer their current property tax assessment to a replacement residence of equal or lesser value within the same county, provided the replacement home is purchased within two years of selling the original home. It enables eligible seniors to move to different homes without facing higher property taxes based on current market values.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 60", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_60_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2060%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2060%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 913, "fingerprint": "1986|CA891|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA891|Statewide", "content_hash": "759b3bc3caa0028e", "measure_id": "CA891", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 58", "description": "Taxation. Family Transfers.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.69999695, "percent_no": 24.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 58", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_58_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2058%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2058%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 912, "fingerprint": "1986|CA890|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA890|Statewide", "content_hash": "240c1dbbc309799f", "measure_id": "CA890", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 42", "description": "Veterans Bond Act Of 1986", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.59999847, "percent_no": 24.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 42", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_42_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2042%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2042%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 911, "fingerprint": "1986|CA889|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA889|Statewide", "content_hash": "26f842b7b8cab78d", "measure_id": "CA889", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 44", "description": "Water Conservation And Water Quality Bond Law Of 1986", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.09999847, "percent_no": 25.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue $100 million in general obl...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue $100 million in general obligation bonds to fund water conservation projects and improve water quality throughout California. The funds would be used for grants and loans to local agencies for water recycling, groundwater protection, and conservation programs.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 44", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_44_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2044%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2044%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 910, "fingerprint": "1986|CA888|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA888|Statewide", "content_hash": "a03c084b3984b351", "measure_id": "CA888", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 63", "description": "Official State Language. Initiative Constitutional Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.19999695, "percent_no": 26.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1986 California constitutional amendment established English as the offi...", "summary_text": "This 1986 California constitutional amendment established English as the official language of the state. The measure required the state to take steps to preserve and enhance the role of English as the common language while allowing exceptions for public health and safety purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 63", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_63_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2063%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2063%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 909, "fingerprint": "1986|CA887|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA887|Statewide", "content_hash": "5634ba7edf7393ea", "measure_id": "CA887", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 57", "description": "Retirement Benefits For Nonjudicial And Nonlegislative Elected State Constitutional Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.69999695, "percent_no": 27.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established retirement benefits for elected state constitutional...", "summary_text": "This measure established retirement benefits for elected state constitutional officers who are not judges or legislators, such as the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, and other statewide elected officials. It created a pension system for these positions that previously did not have formal retirement benefits.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 57", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_57_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2057%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2057%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 908, "fingerprint": "1986|CA886|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA886|Statewide", "content_hash": "8f84d1ae7a40f41a", "measure_id": "CA886", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 50", "description": "Property Taxation. Disasters.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.5, "percent_no": 29.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 50", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_50_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2050%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2050%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 907, "fingerprint": "1986|CA885|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA885|Statewide", "content_hash": "9d731914656e7ba9", "measure_id": "CA885", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 43", "description": "Community Parklands Act Of 1986", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.30000305, "percent_no": 32.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1986 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fu...", "summary_text": "This 1986 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the acquisition, development, and improvement of community parklands and recreational facilities. The measure provided funding for local governments and agencies to expand public park systems and recreational opportunities throughout the state.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 43", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_43_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2043%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2043%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 906, "fingerprint": "1986|CA884|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA884|Statewide", "content_hash": "d912304cb54bbe86", "measure_id": "CA884", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 52", "description": "County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure Bond Act Of 1986", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.19999695, "percent_no": 32.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the construction and...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the construction and improvement of county correctional facilities in California. The bonds would provide capital funding for jails and other county-level detention infrastructure.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 52", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_52_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2052%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2052%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 905, "fingerprint": "1986|CA883|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA883|Statewide", "content_hash": "04402d0449188e40", "measure_id": "CA883", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 45", "description": "Deposit Of Public Moneys In Credit Union.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.80000305, "percent_no": 34.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed California public agencies to deposit public funds in cr...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed California public agencies to deposit public funds in credit unions, expanding beyond the previously permitted depositories such as banks and savings and loan associations.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 45", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_45_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2045%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2045%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 904, "fingerprint": "1986|CA882|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA882|Statewide", "content_hash": "9482db7df46e02de", "measure_id": "CA882", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 54", "description": "New Prison Construction Bond Act Of 1986", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.30000305, "percent_no": 34.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in general obligation bonds to finance the construction of new state prison facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's General Fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 54", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_54_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2054%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2054%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 903, "fingerprint": "1986|CA881|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA881|Statewide", "content_hash": "5ae6dad791437368", "measure_id": "CA881", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 65", "description": "Restrictions On Toxic Discharges Into Drinking Water; Requirement Of Notice Of Persons' Exposure To Toxics. Initiative Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.59999847, "percent_no": 37.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Environmental Protection\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1986 California initiative statute established restrictions on the disch...", "summary_text": "This 1986 California initiative statute established restrictions on the discharge of toxic substances into drinking water sources and required businesses to provide notice when people may be exposed to toxic chemicals. The measure created legal requirements for both environmental protection of water supplies and public notification of potential toxic exposures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 65", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_65_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2065%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2065%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 902, "fingerprint": "1986|CA880|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA880|Statewide", "content_hash": "7f4e999426f2b083", "measure_id": "CA880", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 51", "description": "Multiple Defendants Tort Damage Liability.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.09999847, "percent_no": 37.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure modified California tort law regarding liability when multiple d...", "summary_text": "This measure modified California tort law regarding liability when multiple defendants are involved in causing damages. It changed how financial responsibility is distributed among multiple parties found liable in civil lawsuits.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 51", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_51_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2051%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2051%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 901, "fingerprint": "1986|CA879|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA879|Statewide", "content_hash": "350feb0eef3dbb4f", "measure_id": "CA879", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 53", "description": "Greene-Hughes School Building Lease-Purchase Bond Law of 1986", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.70000076, "percent_no": 39.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $800 million in bonds to fund cons...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $800 million in bonds to fund construction and renovation of public school facilities through a lease-purchase financing arrangement. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time to address school building needs throughout California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 53", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_53_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2053%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2053%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 900, "fingerprint": "1986|CA878|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA878|Statewide", "content_hash": "ffda796c76abc0b9", "measure_id": "CA878", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 46", "description": "Property Taxation.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.90000153, "percent_no": 40.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 46", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_46_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2046%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2046%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 899, "fingerprint": "1986|CA877|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA877|Statewide", "content_hash": "11fad87f1d7193af", "measure_id": "CA877", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 56", "description": "Higher Education Facilities Bond Act Of 1986", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.40000153, "percent_no": 40.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This bond measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construction an...", "summary_text": "This bond measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construction and improvement of facilities at California's public universities and colleges. The measure provided financing for capital projects across the University of California, California State University, and community college systems.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 56", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_56_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2056%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2056%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 898, "fingerprint": "1986|CA876|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA876|Statewide", "content_hash": "69dcb341fb651941", "measure_id": "CA876", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 62", "description": "Taxation. Local Governments And Districts.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.0, "percent_no": 42.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the California Constitution to allow local governments a...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the California Constitution to allow local governments and special districts to impose or increase taxes and fees that were previously restricted, while requiring voter approval for new general taxes and two-thirds voter approval for special taxes. It clarified the authority of local governments to generate revenue through various mechanisms while establishing specific voting thresholds for different types of tax measures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 62", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_62_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2062%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2062%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 897, "fingerprint": "1986|CA875|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA875|Statewide", "content_hash": "3ca1635505680c55", "measure_id": "CA875", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 49", "description": "Nonpartisan Office.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.90000153, "percent_no": 44.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 49", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_49_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2049%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2049%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 896, "fingerprint": "1986|CA874|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA874|Statewide", "content_hash": "a510ac516cf47a9d", "measure_id": "CA874", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 61", "description": "Compensation Of Public Officials, Employees, Individual Public Contractors.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.09999847, "percent_no": 65.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Local Government | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1986 California ballot measure would have established limits or restrict...", "summary_text": "This 1986 California ballot measure would have established limits or restrictions on the compensation of public officials, government employees, and individual contractors working for public agencies. The measure failed with only 34.1% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 61", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_61_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2061%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2061%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 895, "fingerprint": "1986|CA873|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1986|CA873|Statewide", "content_hash": "278d567c8e0ac9be", "measure_id": "CA873", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1986, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 64", "description": "Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS).", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 29.29999924, "percent_no": 70.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have required public health officials to use the sa...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have required public health officials to use the same disease control measures for AIDS as used for other infectious diseases, and would have required reporting of AIDS test results to health authorities with the information made available for standard epidemiological investigation and follow-up.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 64", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_64_(1986)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2064%201986", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2064%201986", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 894, "fingerprint": "1984|CA872|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA872|Statewide", "content_hash": "71a3a1199ee30b2c", "measure_id": "CA872", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 33", "description": "Property Tax Postponement. Disabled Person", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 82.19999695, "percent_no": 17.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure extended California's property tax postponement program t...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure extended California's property tax postponement program to include disabled persons, allowing them to defer property tax payments on their primary residence similar to existing provisions for senior citizens.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 33", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_33_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2033%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2033%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 893, "fingerprint": "1984|CA871|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA871|Statewide", "content_hash": "0f4a697bac0a51d4", "measure_id": "CA871", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 28", "description": "California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law of 1984", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.5, "percent_no": 26.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $325 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $325 million in general obligation bonds to fund water supply development, water quality improvement, and groundwater protection projects. The bonds would be repaid through the state's General Fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 28", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_28_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2028%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2028%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 892, "fingerprint": "1984|CA870|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA870|Statewide", "content_hash": "c3d46a6ebf2623f3", "measure_id": "CA870", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 25", "description": "Clean Water Bond Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.90000153, "percent_no": 27.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 25", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_25_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2025%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2025%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 891, "fingerprint": "1984|CA869|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA869|Statewide", "content_hash": "f6d30d5c468e63ef", "measure_id": "CA869", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 27", "description": "Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act of 1984", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.0, "percent_no": 28.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $100 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $100 million in general obligation bonds to fund the cleanup of hazardous substance contamination sites throughout California. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 27", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_27_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2027%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2027%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 890, "fingerprint": "1984|CA868|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA868|Statewide", "content_hash": "44b6d81697833b1f", "measure_id": "CA868", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 38", "description": "Voting Materials in English Only.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.5, "percent_no": 29.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required that all official voting materials and ballots in Calif...", "summary_text": "This measure required that all official voting materials and ballots in California be printed only in English, eliminating multilingual voting materials that had been provided to assist non-English speaking voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 38", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_38_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2038%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2038%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 889, "fingerprint": "1984|CA867|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA867|Statewide", "content_hash": "231c5bf48625fc0f", "measure_id": "CA867", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 30", "description": "Senior Center Bond Act of 1984", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.69999695, "percent_no": 33.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 30", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_30_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2030%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2030%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 888, "fingerprint": "1984|CA866|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA866|Statewide", "content_hash": "b30fd82958f91b1c", "measure_id": "CA866", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 29", "description": "Veterans Bond Act of 1984", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.30000305, "percent_no": 33.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 29", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_29_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2029%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2029%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 887, "fingerprint": "1984|CA865|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA865|Statewide", "content_hash": "8ec0c629786bd078", "measure_id": "CA865", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Fish And Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Act Of 1984", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.0, "percent_no": 36.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The Fish And Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Act of 1984 established programs an...", "summary_text": "The Fish And Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Act of 1984 established programs and funding mechanisms to enhance and protect fish and wildlife habitats throughout California. The measure created dedicated revenue sources for habitat conservation projects and expanded the state's authority to acquire and manage lands for wildlife preservation.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 886, "fingerprint": "1984|CA864|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA864|Statewide", "content_hash": "d220fafd03f76ea2", "measure_id": "CA864", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "California Park And Recreational Facilities Act Of 1984", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.20000076, "percent_no": 36.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The California Park And Recreational Facilities Act of 1984 authorized the st...", "summary_text": "The California Park And Recreational Facilities Act of 1984 authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the acquisition, development, and improvement of park and recreational facilities throughout California. The measure provided funding for state and local parks, beaches, trails, and other recreational infrastructure projects.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 885, "fingerprint": "1984|CA863|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA863|Statewide", "content_hash": "028e3fcd7733de1f", "measure_id": "CA863", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 26", "description": "State School Building Lease-Purchase Bond Law of 1984", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.70000076, "percent_no": 39.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $850 million in bonds to fund the ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $850 million in bonds to fund the construction and improvement of public school facilities through a lease-purchase financing mechanism. The bonds would be repaid through the state's General Fund over time to address school building needs across California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 26", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_26_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2026%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2026%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 884, "fingerprint": "1984|CA862|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA862|Statewide", "content_hash": "14ce23a399dfe745", "measure_id": "CA862", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 32", "description": "Supreme Court. Transfer of Causes and Review of Decisions of 1984", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.29999924, "percent_no": 40.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1984 California ballot measure amended the state constitution to give th...", "summary_text": "This 1984 California ballot measure amended the state constitution to give the Supreme Court discretionary jurisdiction over most appeals, allowing it to choose which cases to review rather than being required to hear all appeals. It also transferred certain types of cases from the Supreme Court to the Courts of Appeal to reduce the Supreme Court's mandatory caseload.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 32", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_32_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2032%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2032%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 883, "fingerprint": "1984|CA861|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA861|Statewide", "content_hash": "aba7aea4ed896e55", "measure_id": "CA861", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "County Jail Capital Expenditure Bond Act Of 1984", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.79999924, "percent_no": 41.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1984 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fu...", "summary_text": "This 1984 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund capital expenditures for county jail construction and improvements. The measure passed with 58.8% voter approval, providing funding for jail infrastructure projects throughout the state.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 882, "fingerprint": "1984|CA860|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA860|Statewide", "content_hash": "c61bf942f3bfe06c", "measure_id": "CA860", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 37", "description": "State Lottery.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.90000153, "percent_no": 42.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Gambling & Lotteries\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 37", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_37_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2037%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2037%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 881, "fingerprint": "1984|CA859|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA859|Statewide", "content_hash": "e499114ab7dd11f0", "measure_id": "CA859", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "New Prison Construction Bond Act Of 1984", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.79999924, "percent_no": 42.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $500 million in general obligation bonds to finance the construction of new state prison facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 880, "fingerprint": "1984|CA858|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA858|Statewide", "content_hash": "e48162b5787c8596", "measure_id": "CA858", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Property Taxation. Seismic Safety Construction Exclusion.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.29999924, "percent_no": 46.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed property owners to exclude from property tax assessments...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed property owners to exclude from property tax assessments the value of seismic safety improvements made to existing buildings. The exclusion applied to construction work specifically designed to improve a structure's ability to withstand earthquakes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 879, "fingerprint": "1984|CA857|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA857|Statewide", "content_hash": "a1ba2284c13a7a0e", "measure_id": "CA857", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Public Pension Fund Investments.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.20000076, "percent_no": 46.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Labor & Employment | Local Government | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure prohibited California public pension funds from making new inves...", "summary_text": "This measure prohibited California public pension funds from making new investments in companies or financial institutions that make loans to South Africa, and required divestment of existing such investments within specified timeframes. The measure aimed to use economic pressure against South Africa's apartheid system by restricting how public pension money could be invested.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 878, "fingerprint": "1984|CA856|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA856|Statewide", "content_hash": "dcf297a9638f54dc", "measure_id": "CA856", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 24", "description": "Legislature: Rules, Procedures, Powers, Funding.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.09999847, "percent_no": 46.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure gave the California Legislature authority to establish its own r...", "summary_text": "This measure gave the California Legislature authority to establish its own rules and procedures, determine its powers, and control its funding and operations. It increased legislative independence by reducing external constraints on how the Legislature conducts its business.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 24", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 877, "fingerprint": "1984|CA855|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA855|Statewide", "content_hash": "c441be8f7b92e115", "measure_id": "CA855", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Elected Officials. Disqualification for Libelous or Slanderous Campaign Statements.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.90000153, "percent_no": 48.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would disqualify elected officials from holding office if they w...", "summary_text": "This measure would disqualify elected officials from holding office if they were found to have made libelous or slanderous statements during their campaigns. It established a legal mechanism for removing officials based on false and defamatory campaign communications.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 876, "fingerprint": "1984|CA854|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA854|Statewide", "content_hash": "e9967d1bfd961585", "measure_id": "CA854", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 31", "description": "Property Taxation. Fire Protection System Exclusion of 1984", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.79999924, "percent_no": 49.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure excluded fire protection systems from property tax assess...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure excluded fire protection systems from property tax assessments in California. The measure passed with 50.8% of the vote, meaning property owners would not pay additional property taxes on fire sprinklers and other fire safety equipment installed in their buildings.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 31", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_31_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2031%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2031%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 875, "fingerprint": "1984|CA853|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA853|Statewide", "content_hash": "dccc300658d8ca13", "measure_id": "CA853", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Exempt State Civil Service Position.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.0, "percent_no": 52.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have exempted certain state civil service positions from e...", "summary_text": "This measure would have exempted certain state civil service positions from existing civil service protections and requirements. The specific positions and scope of the exemption were not detailed in the brief ballot title provided.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 874, "fingerprint": "1984|CA852|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA852|Statewide", "content_hash": "53177a87e8f7a71a", "measure_id": "CA852", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 34", "description": "Property Taxation. Historic Structure Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.70000076, "percent_no": 52.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have exempted historic structures from property tax...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have exempted historic structures from property taxation in California. The measure failed with 47.7% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 34", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_34_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2034%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2034%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 873, "fingerprint": "1984|CA851|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA851|Statewide", "content_hash": "75496e9b901a5378", "measure_id": "CA851", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 36", "description": "Taxation.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.20000076, "percent_no": 54.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Legislatures | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 36", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_36_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2036%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2036%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 872, "fingerprint": "1984|CA850|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA850|Statewide", "content_hash": "ca60342534d8e95d", "measure_id": "CA850", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 39", "description": "Reapportionment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.79999924, "percent_no": 55.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 39", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_39_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2039%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2039%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 871, "fingerprint": "1984|CA849|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA849|Statewide", "content_hash": "4dcd0b68625b58b4", "measure_id": "CA849", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 41", "description": "Public Aid and Medical Assistance Programs.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.0, "percent_no": 63.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | Human Services | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have modified California's public aid and medical a...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have modified California's public aid and medical assistance programs, though the specific changes are not detailed in the provided ballot text. The measure failed with 37% voter approval in 1984.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 41", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_41_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2041%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2041%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 870, "fingerprint": "1984|CA848|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1984|CA848|Statewide", "content_hash": "cb4e2fc5270571be", "measure_id": "CA848", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1984, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 40", "description": "Campaign Contribution Limitations. Elective State Offices.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.5, "percent_no": 64.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established limits on campaign contributions to candi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established limits on campaign contributions to candidates for statewide elected offices in California. It failed with 35.5% of voters supporting it in 1984.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 40", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_40_(1984)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2040%201984", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2040%201984", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 869, "fingerprint": "1982|CA847|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA847|Statewide", "content_hash": "f7d0d0aceabf076c", "measure_id": "CA847", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Veterans Bond Act Of 1982", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.09999847, "percent_no": 32.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 868, "fingerprint": "1982|CA846|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA846|Statewide", "content_hash": "c7f4915b655e79d9", "measure_id": "CA846", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Gift and Inheritance Taxes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.40000153, "percent_no": 35.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 867, "fingerprint": "1982|CA845|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA845|Statewide", "content_hash": "32749b0905746c78", "measure_id": "CA845", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Income Tax Indexing.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.5, "percent_no": 36.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 866, "fingerprint": "1982|CA844|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA844|Statewide", "content_hash": "d0859f8ed92bb043", "measure_id": "CA844", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Gift and Inheritance Taxes.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.79999924, "percent_no": 38.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 865, "fingerprint": "1982|CA843|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA843|Statewide", "content_hash": "ab7107352936dc4c", "measure_id": "CA843", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Criminal Justice.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.40000153, "percent_no": 43.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 864, "fingerprint": "1982|CA842|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA842|Statewide", "content_hash": "8e9ec23a5564cb5a", "measure_id": "CA842", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "New Prison Construction Bond Act of 1981", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.09999847, "percent_no": 43.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $495 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $495 million in general obligation bonds to finance the construction of new state prison facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 863, "fingerprint": "1982|CA841|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA841|Statewide", "content_hash": "e7c12406f3ae6f5b", "measure_id": "CA841", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "County Jail Capital Expenditure Bond Act of 1981", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.29999924, "percent_no": 45.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $400 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $400 million in general obligation bonds to provide grants to counties for constructing, renovating, and improving county jail facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's General Fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 862, "fingerprint": "1982|CA840|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA840|Statewide", "content_hash": "ae99ea6a75987390", "measure_id": "CA840", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "First-Time Home Buyers Bond Act Of 1982", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.79999924, "percent_no": 46.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to provide low-intere...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to provide low-interest loans to first-time home buyers in California. The bond program was designed to help make homeownership more affordable for qualifying buyers through below-market interest rates.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 861, "fingerprint": "1982|CA839|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA839|Statewide", "content_hash": "6bb93de8042000dd", "measure_id": "CA839", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Lake Tahoe Acquisitions Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.90000153, "percent_no": 47.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $85 million in general obligation ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $85 million in general obligation bonds to acquire environmentally sensitive land around Lake Tahoe for preservation purposes. The bonds would be repaid through the state's General Fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 860, "fingerprint": "1982|CA838|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA838|Statewide", "content_hash": "05c01cbe6e8691c5", "measure_id": "CA838", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Nuclear Weapons.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.29999924, "percent_no": 47.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Federal Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 859, "fingerprint": "1982|CA837|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA837|Statewide", "content_hash": "de0c8068d973f35a", "measure_id": "CA837", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Transfer Of Funds By Local Governments.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.0, "percent_no": 49.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure established the authority for local governments in Califo...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure established the authority for local governments in California to transfer funds between different accounts or budget categories. It provided local governments with greater flexibility in managing their financial resources by allowing money to be moved from one designated fund to another as needed.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 858, "fingerprint": "1982|CA836|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA836|Statewide", "content_hash": "25205644646b9b84", "measure_id": "CA836", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "State School Building Lease-Purchase Bond Law Of 1982.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.5, "percent_no": 49.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds for school building construc...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds for school building construction and improvements through a lease-purchase financing arrangement. It provided funding for public school facilities across California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 857, "fingerprint": "1982|CA835|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA835|Statewide", "content_hash": "b9bb19954234ad49", "measure_id": "CA835", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Reapportionment By Districting Commission Or Supreme Court.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.5, "percent_no": 54.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have transferred responsibility for drawing legislative an...", "summary_text": "This measure would have transferred responsibility for drawing legislative and congressional district boundaries from the state legislature to either a districting commission or the California Supreme Court. The proposal aimed to remove the legislature's role in the redistricting process that occurs after each census.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 856, "fingerprint": "1982|CA834|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA834|Statewide", "content_hash": "3a8a0027ebb629d1", "measure_id": "CA834", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Beverage Containers.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.09999847, "percent_no": 55.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Environmental Protection\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 855, "fingerprint": "1982|CA833|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA833|Statewide", "content_hash": "d6842855577292ff", "measure_id": "CA833", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Taxation. Real Property Valuation. New Construction.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.29999924, "percent_no": 58.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have changed California's real property tax system ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have changed California's real property tax system by modifying how new construction is valued for taxation purposes. The measure failed with 41.3% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 854, "fingerprint": "1982|CA832|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA832|Statewide", "content_hash": "9ed9960f61604405", "measure_id": "CA832", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Public Pension Fund Investment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.20000076, "percent_no": 60.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Labor & Employment | Local Government | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have restricted California public pension funds from inves...", "summary_text": "This measure would have restricted California public pension funds from investing in companies that do business in South Africa, requiring divestment from such investments as a form of economic pressure against the apartheid system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 853, "fingerprint": "1982|CA831|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA831|Statewide", "content_hash": "ca4dc831fe18f9df", "measure_id": "CA831", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "School Textbooks. Nonpublic Schools.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.90000153, "percent_no": 61.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have allowed nonpublic schools to purchase textbook...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have allowed nonpublic schools to purchase textbooks from the same state-approved list used by public schools. It would have expanded the existing state textbook adoption system to include private and parochial schools as eligible purchasers.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 852, "fingerprint": "1982|CA830|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA830|Statewide", "content_hash": "35cd700114724ba2", "measure_id": "CA830", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Reapportionment. Assembly Districts.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.90000153, "percent_no": 62.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required the California Legislature to redraw Assembl...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required the California Legislature to redraw Assembly district boundaries according to specified criteria including population equality, compactness, and respect for existing political subdivisions. The measure aimed to establish new standards for the redistricting process that occurs after each census.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 851, "fingerprint": "1982|CA829|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA829|Statewide", "content_hash": "0be1de1df40793e9", "measure_id": "CA829", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Reapportionment. Senate Districts.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.79999924, "percent_no": 62.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed how California Senate districts are drawn for...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed how California Senate districts are drawn for reapportionment purposes. The specific redistricting changes proposed in the measure were rejected by voters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 850, "fingerprint": "1982|CA828|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA828|Statewide", "content_hash": "fbc0e34ee6c45624", "measure_id": "CA828", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Water Facilities Including a Peripheral Canal.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.29999924, "percent_no": 62.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1982 California ballot measure would have authorized the construction of...", "summary_text": "This 1982 California ballot measure would have authorized the construction of water facilities including a peripheral canal to transport water around the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. The measure failed with 37.3% voter approval.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 849, "fingerprint": "1982|CA827|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA827|Statewide", "content_hash": "93663e83edec937b", "measure_id": "CA827", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Handgun Registration", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.20000076, "percent_no": 62.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 848, "fingerprint": "1982|CA826|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA826|Statewide", "content_hash": "f3d26adc09ce96ed", "measure_id": "CA826", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Reapportionment. Congressional Districts.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.40000153, "percent_no": 64.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required California's congressional district boundari...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required California's congressional district boundaries to be redrawn using specified criteria and procedures different from the existing reapportionment process. The measure aimed to establish new standards for how congressional districts are configured when district lines are redrawn following each census.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 847, "fingerprint": "1982|CA825|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA825|Statewide", "content_hash": "894b9b1c8d11eb8c", "measure_id": "CA825", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Water Resources.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.20000076, "percent_no": 64.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 846, "fingerprint": "1982|CA824|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA824|Statewide", "content_hash": "bb15b64a983902bb", "measure_id": "CA824", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Unifying Superior, Municipal, And Justice Courts.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.70000076, "percent_no": 65.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have unified California's three-tier trial court sy...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have unified California's three-tier trial court system by combining superior, municipal, and justice courts into a single level of trial courts. The consolidation aimed to streamline the state's court structure and eliminate jurisdictional divisions between the different types of local courts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 845, "fingerprint": "1982|CA823|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1982|CA823|Statewide", "content_hash": "f5be0fd485402040", "measure_id": "CA823", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1982, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "President of Senate.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.59999847, "percent_no": 67.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1982)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201982", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201982", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 844, "fingerprint": "1980|CA822|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA822|Statewide", "content_hash": "77fac6ed2918bb2d", "measure_id": "CA822", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7P", "description": "Disaster Assistance", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 82.90000153, "percent_no": 17.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7P_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207P%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207P%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 843, "fingerprint": "1980|CA821|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA821|Statewide", "content_hash": "da7767528a6096a8", "measure_id": "CA821", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5P", "description": "Freedom of Press.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.30000305, "percent_no": 24.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5P_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205P%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205P%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 842, "fingerprint": "1980|CA820|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA820|Statewide", "content_hash": "1c4bf7973d85690e", "measure_id": "CA820", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11G", "description": "Judges' Salaries", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.30000305, "percent_no": 29.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11G_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011G%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011G%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 841, "fingerprint": "1980|CA819|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA819|Statewide", "content_hash": "ee7e07f256f64fc2", "measure_id": "CA819", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2P", "description": "Veterans Bond Act of 1980", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.5, "percent_no": 34.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2P_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202P%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202P%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 840, "fingerprint": "1980|CA818|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA818|Statewide", "content_hash": "f430c48d351b7915", "measure_id": "CA818", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7G", "description": "Taxation. Real Property Valuation. Solar Energy Systems", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.5, "percent_no": 34.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure exempted solar energy systems from property tax assessments, mea...", "summary_text": "This measure exempted solar energy systems from property tax assessments, meaning homeowners would not pay additional property taxes on the increased value that solar installations add to their properties. The exemption was designed to encourage adoption of solar energy technology by removing a financial disincentive for installation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7G_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207G%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207G%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 839, "fingerprint": "1980|CA817|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA817|Statewide", "content_hash": "860080b02966faea", "measure_id": "CA817", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9G", "description": "California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law of 1976.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.40000153, "percent_no": 35.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund safe drinking...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund safe drinking water projects and infrastructure improvements. The measure passed with 64.4% voter approval in 1980.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9G_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209G%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209G%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 838, "fingerprint": "1980|CA816|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA816|Statewide", "content_hash": "66aa316fa63937c9", "measure_id": "CA816", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6G", "description": "Number of Jurors in Civil Cases", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.5, "percent_no": 42.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure reduced the number of jurors required for civil cases in ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure reduced the number of jurors required for civil cases in California courts from 12 to 8. The change applied to civil litigation but did not affect criminal cases, which continued to require 12-person juries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6G_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206G%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206G%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 837, "fingerprint": "1980|CA815|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA815|Statewide", "content_hash": "25e43d0618593cac", "measure_id": "CA815", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6P", "description": "Reapportionment.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.70000076, "percent_no": 45.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6P_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206P%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206P%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 836, "fingerprint": "1980|CA814|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA814|Statewide", "content_hash": "618646602bce148d", "measure_id": "CA814", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8G", "description": "Water Resources Development and Protection", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.29999924, "percent_no": 46.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $495 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $495 million in general obligation bonds to fund water conservation, development, and protection projects throughout California. The bonds would finance activities including water storage facilities, groundwater management, water recycling systems, and watershed protection programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8G_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208G%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208G%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 835, "fingerprint": "1980|CA813|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA813|Statewide", "content_hash": "4be3b7f4513ca99f", "measure_id": "CA813", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3P", "description": "State Capitol Maintenance.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.90000153, "percent_no": 49.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3P_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203P%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203P%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 834, "fingerprint": "1980|CA812|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA812|Statewide", "content_hash": "27f2d0bc76100653", "measure_id": "CA812", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8P", "description": "Alternative Energy Sources Facility Financing.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.20000076, "percent_no": 49.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance alternative energ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance alternative energy facilities such as solar, wind, and geothermal power projects. The bonds would be repaid through revenues generated by the alternative energy facilities.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8P_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208P%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208P%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 833, "fingerprint": "1980|CA811|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA811|Statewide", "content_hash": "bb57468063c5037e", "measure_id": "CA811", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2G", "description": "Lake Tahoe Acquisitions Bond Act of 1980", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.79999924, "percent_no": 51.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized California to issue bonds to fund the acqu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized California to issue bonds to fund the acquisition of environmentally sensitive land around Lake Tahoe. The bonds would have provided funding for the state to purchase private property in the Lake Tahoe basin for conservation purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2G_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202G%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202G%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 832, "fingerprint": "1980|CA810|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA810|Statewide", "content_hash": "99155e85cbe6cffa", "measure_id": "CA810", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1P", "description": "Parklands and Renewable Resources Investment Program.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.0, "percent_no": 53.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have created a statewide program to invest in parklands an...", "summary_text": "This measure would have created a statewide program to invest in parklands and renewable resources development in California. The initiative proposed funding mechanisms for expanding park facilities and supporting renewable energy projects through a dedicated investment program.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1P_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201P%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201P%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 831, "fingerprint": "1980|CA809|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA809|Statewide", "content_hash": "f6f3129c3f6550ea", "measure_id": "CA809", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1G", "description": "Parklands Acquisition and Development Program", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.0, "percent_no": 53.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized California to issue general obligation bon...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized California to issue general obligation bonds to fund the acquisition and development of parklands throughout the state. The bonds would have been repaid through state tax revenues over time.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1G_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201G%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201G%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 830, "fingerprint": "1980|CA808|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA808|Statewide", "content_hash": "5a14763ede53876d", "measure_id": "CA808", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10G", "description": "Smoking and No-Smoking Sections -- Initiative Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.59999847, "percent_no": 53.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1980 California initiative statute would have required the establishment...", "summary_text": "This 1980 California initiative statute would have required the establishment of designated smoking and no-smoking sections in certain public places and businesses. The measure failed with 46.6% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10G_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010G%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010G%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 829, "fingerprint": "1980|CA807|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA807|Statewide", "content_hash": "13f34470e5a612d4", "measure_id": "CA807", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11P", "description": "Taxation. Surtax.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.29999924, "percent_no": 55.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11P_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011P%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011P%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 828, "fingerprint": "1980|CA806|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA806|Statewide", "content_hash": "bacae3b0b9ba4a3f", "measure_id": "CA806", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5G", "description": "Taxation. Real Property Valuation. Disasters, Seismic Safety, Change in Ownership", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.29999924, "percent_no": 57.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed real property to be reassessed at current mar...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed real property to be reassessed at current market value when damaged by earthquakes or other disasters, and would have modified certain aspects of property tax assessment related to change in ownership and seismic safety improvements. It also would have provided specific procedures for property valuation following natural disasters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5G_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205G%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205G%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 827, "fingerprint": "1980|CA805|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA805|Statewide", "content_hash": "5dcd1d5ee0f28c1a", "measure_id": "CA805", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9P", "description": "Taxation. Income.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.20000076, "percent_no": 60.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9P_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209P%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209P%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 826, "fingerprint": "1980|CA804|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA804|Statewide", "content_hash": "85349b285f08f575", "measure_id": "CA804", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4P", "description": "Low-Rent Housing.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.59999847, "percent_no": 61.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4P_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204P%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204P%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 825, "fingerprint": "1980|CA803|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA803|Statewide", "content_hash": "37a089a333b15fef", "measure_id": "CA803", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10P", "description": "Rent-Control Through Local Ordinance", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.40000153, "percent_no": 64.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed local governments in California to enact rent...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed local governments in California to enact rent control ordinances regulating residential rental prices and terms. It would have overridden existing state restrictions that limited local jurisdictions' ability to implement rent control policies.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10P_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010P%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010P%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 824, "fingerprint": "1980|CA802|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA802|Statewide", "content_hash": "04e13df9f8d9bbb4", "measure_id": "CA802", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3G", "description": "Insurance Guarantee Funds. Tax Offset", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.70000076, "percent_no": 72.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed insurance companies to deduct their contribut...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed insurance companies to deduct their contributions to state insurance guarantee funds from their state tax liability. The guarantee funds provide protection to policyholders when insurance companies become insolvent.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3G_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203G%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203G%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 823, "fingerprint": "1980|CA801|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1980|CA801|Statewide", "content_hash": "82158e0c6fc13965", "measure_id": "CA801", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1980, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4G", "description": "Taxation. Real Property. Property Acquisition by Taxing Entity", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 24.89999962, "percent_no": 75.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required voter approval for government entities to ac...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required voter approval for government entities to acquire real property when the acquisition would reduce the local tax base or remove property from taxation. It would have applied to purchases, condemnations, and other forms of property acquisition by state and local government agencies.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1980, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4G_(1980)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204G%201980", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204G%201980", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 822, "fingerprint": "1979|CA800|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1979|CA800|Statewide", "content_hash": "4c46030e526df3f2", "measure_id": "CA800", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1979, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Property Taxation--Veteran's Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.90000153, "percent_no": 24.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure expanded property tax exemptions for veterans by allowing disabl...", "summary_text": "This measure expanded property tax exemptions for veterans by allowing disabled veterans to receive exemptions on properties they do not personally occupy, and extended certain veteran property tax benefits to surviving spouses.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1979)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201979", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201979", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 821, "fingerprint": "1979|CA799|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1979|CA799|Statewide", "content_hash": "bb29e013a890385f", "measure_id": "CA799", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1979, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Limitation of Government Appropriations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.30000305, "percent_no": 25.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure limited annual increases in state government appropriations to t...", "summary_text": "This measure limited annual increases in state government appropriations to the prior year's level adjusted for changes in population and the cost of living. It required voter approval for tax increases and mandated that excess revenues be returned to taxpayers when possible.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1979)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201979", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201979", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 820, "fingerprint": "1979|CA798|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1979|CA798|Statewide", "content_hash": "c18dd7e5321135f6", "measure_id": "CA798", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1979, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "School Assignment and Transportation of Pupils", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.59999847, "percent_no": 31.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure prohibited California courts from ordering student busing or sch...", "summary_text": "This measure prohibited California courts from ordering student busing or school reassignment to achieve racial integration unless a federal court would require such action for the same situation. It effectively limited state-ordered school desegregation remedies to only those circumstances where federal law would mandate the same remedies.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1979)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201979", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201979", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 819, "fingerprint": "1979|CA797|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1979|CA797|Statewide", "content_hash": "f6f0c00201ba5c9c", "measure_id": "CA797", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1979, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Loan Interest Rates", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.59999847, "percent_no": 35.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1979)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201979", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201979", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 818, "fingerprint": "1978|CA796|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA796|Statewide", "content_hash": "318a3100e9e0a499", "measure_id": "CA796", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Post-Disaster Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 78.5, "percent_no": 21.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 817, "fingerprint": "1978|CA795|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA795|Statewide", "content_hash": "861a6dee23de7d7a", "measure_id": "CA795", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Chiropractors. School Accreditation and License Revocation.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.0, "percent_no": 25.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure would allow chiropractic schools to be accredited by accrediting ...", "summary_text": "The measure would allow chiropractic schools to be accredited by accrediting agencies other than those recognized by the U.S. Office of Education, and would restrict the grounds on which chiropractor licenses can be revoked to cases involving unprofessional conduct or fraud.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 816, "fingerprint": "1978|CA794|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA794|Statewide", "content_hash": "85ad88bcdd48d234", "measure_id": "CA794", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Murder. Penalty.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.09999847, "percent_no": 28.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 815, "fingerprint": "1978|CA793|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA793|Statewide", "content_hash": "06954e632cff898b", "measure_id": "CA793", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Property Tax Limitation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.80000305, "percent_no": 35.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}], "is_landmark": true}, {"id": 814, "fingerprint": "1978|CA792|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA792|Statewide", "content_hash": "43b6ae8baa6b0b0f", "measure_id": "CA792", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Veterans Bond Act of 1978", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.29999924, "percent_no": 37.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services | Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 813, "fingerprint": "1978|CA791|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA791|Statewide", "content_hash": "062dc6d1bc8d1c85", "measure_id": "CA791", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Sheriffs", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.79999924, "percent_no": 39.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 812, "fingerprint": "1978|CA790|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA790|Statewide", "content_hash": "e8ba663205275116", "measure_id": "CA790", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "State Surplus Coastal Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.09999847, "percent_no": 44.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Environmental Protection | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 811, "fingerprint": "1978|CA789|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA789|Statewide", "content_hash": "0e84d555cea369e2", "measure_id": "CA789", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Administrative Agencies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.5, "percent_no": 45.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 810, "fingerprint": "1978|CA788|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA788|Statewide", "content_hash": "33b7f7eb782454d0", "measure_id": "CA788", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Local Agencies - Insurance Pooling Arrangements", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.5, "percent_no": 46.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance | Labor & Employment | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized local government agencies in California to for...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized local government agencies in California to form insurance pooling arrangements to jointly purchase insurance coverage and share risks. The measure allowed cities, counties, and other local agencies to collaborate on insurance matters rather than each entity having to secure coverage independently.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 809, "fingerprint": "1978|CA787|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA787|Statewide", "content_hash": "eac5493081e26946", "measure_id": "CA787", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Clean Water and Water Conservation Bond Law of 1978", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.5, "percent_no": 46.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $375 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $375 million in general obligation bonds to fund water conservation, development, and clean water projects throughout California. The bonds would finance infrastructure improvements including water treatment facilities, groundwater management systems, and water supply development projects.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 808, "fingerprint": "1978|CA786|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA786|Statewide", "content_hash": "a8dfb7d51828a141", "measure_id": "CA786", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "City Charters - Boards of Education", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.0, "percent_no": 48.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed cities to include provisions for boards of education in ...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed cities to include provisions for boards of education in their city charters. It gave municipalities the option to incorporate educational governance structures directly into their local government charters.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 807, "fingerprint": "1978|CA785|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA785|Statewide", "content_hash": "5d3a4593c12b2b1c", "measure_id": "CA785", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Interest Rate - Judgments", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.20000076, "percent_no": 48.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 806, "fingerprint": "1978|CA784|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA784|Statewide", "content_hash": "2d6ee567c8b51c27", "measure_id": "CA784", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Owner Occupied Dwellings - Tax Rate", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.0, "percent_no": 53.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have limited property tax rates on owner-occupied resident...", "summary_text": "This measure would have limited property tax rates on owner-occupied residential dwellings to a maximum of 1% of assessed value. It would have prohibited local governments from imposing additional property taxes on such dwellings beyond this 1% cap.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 805, "fingerprint": "1978|CA783|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA783|Statewide", "content_hash": "afa93b5a53ff8add", "measure_id": "CA783", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Regulation of Smoking", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.59999847, "percent_no": 54.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 804, "fingerprint": "1978|CA782|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA782|Statewide", "content_hash": "922e8a202b2c0893", "measure_id": "CA782", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Taxation Exemption - Alternative Energy Systems", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.20000076, "percent_no": 54.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have exempted alternative energy systems from property tax...", "summary_text": "This measure would have exempted alternative energy systems from property taxation in California. The ballot initiative aimed to provide tax relief for property owners who installed solar, wind, or other renewable energy systems on their properties.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 803, "fingerprint": "1978|CA781|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA781|Statewide", "content_hash": "798d80455bc5f846", "measure_id": "CA781", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Taxation - County Owned Real Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.70000076, "percent_no": 56.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required counties to pay property taxes on real estat...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required counties to pay property taxes on real estate they own to the same local taxing entities that tax private property owners. The tax revenue would have been distributed to cities, school districts, and special districts in the same manner as taxes on privately-owned property.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 802, "fingerprint": "1978|CA780|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA780|Statewide", "content_hash": "b40219769895535a", "measure_id": "CA780", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Taxation - Rehabilitated Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.79999924, "percent_no": 57.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have exempted property owners from paying increased proper...", "summary_text": "This measure would have exempted property owners from paying increased property taxes on improvements made to rehabilitate residential, commercial, or industrial buildings for a period of time. The tax exemption would have applied to the added value from rehabilitation work, while the property would continue to be taxed on its original assessed value.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 801, "fingerprint": "1978|CA779|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA779|Statewide", "content_hash": "9f3c8f966e8cbb88", "measure_id": "CA779", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "School Employees. Homosexuality.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.59999847, "percent_no": 58.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have prohibited homosexual individuals from working...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have prohibited homosexual individuals from working in California public schools and would have required the dismissal of any current school employees found to be homosexual. The measure also would have prohibited anyone from advocating, encouraging, or promoting homosexual activity in public schools.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 800, "fingerprint": "1978|CA778|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA778|Statewide", "content_hash": "a17311f9de07a7b3", "measure_id": "CA778", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Public Utilities Commission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.29999924, "percent_no": 61.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 799, "fingerprint": "1978|CA777|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA777|Statewide", "content_hash": "850547ef68d04252", "measure_id": "CA777", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Constitutional Officers, Legislators and Judges Compensation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.09999847, "percent_no": 61.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary | Labor & Employment | Legislatures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited California constitutional officers, legisl...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited California constitutional officers, legislators, and judges from receiving salary increases during their current terms of office. It aimed to prevent elected and appointed officials from benefiting financially from pay raises while serving in their existing positions.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 798, "fingerprint": "1978|CA776|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1978|CA776|Statewide", "content_hash": "1cb399db60172765", "measure_id": "CA776", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1978, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "State School Building Aid Bond Law of 1978", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.0, "percent_no": 65.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to provide fundin...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to provide funding for the construction, reconstruction, and improvement of public school buildings and facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through the state's general fund revenues over time.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1978)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201978", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201978", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 797, "fingerprint": "1976|CA775|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA775|Statewide", "content_hash": "0484c70fd0438d3e", "measure_id": "CA775", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Judges. Censure, Removal, Judicial Performance Commission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 83.09999847, "percent_no": 16.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established the Commission on Judicial Performance with authorit...", "summary_text": "This measure established the Commission on Judicial Performance with authority to censure, remove, or otherwise discipline judges for misconduct or incapacity. The commission would consist of judges, attorneys, and public members with power to investigate complaints and impose sanctions on members of the judiciary.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 796, "fingerprint": "1976|CA774|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA774|Statewide", "content_hash": "bf8bb271ab84bc33", "measure_id": "CA774", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Chiropractors, Board of Examiners. Licensing Requirements", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 81.09999847, "percent_no": 18.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established licensing requirements and a Board of Examiners for ...", "summary_text": "This measure established licensing requirements and a Board of Examiners for chiropractors in California. It created regulatory oversight for the chiropractic profession through state-mandated licensing standards.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 795, "fingerprint": "1976|CA773|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA773|Statewide", "content_hash": "aabd86bb6c5578be", "measure_id": "CA773", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Property Taxation by Local Governments Whose Boundaries Include Area in Two or More Counties.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 79.80000305, "percent_no": 20.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized local governments whose boundaries span two or more c...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized local governments whose boundaries span two or more counties to levy property taxes across their entire jurisdiction, regardless of county lines.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 794, "fingerprint": "1976|CA772|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA772|Statewide", "content_hash": "f1eb6c858c2d6e14", "measure_id": "CA772", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Deposit of Public Moneys in Savings and Loan Associations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.19999695, "percent_no": 25.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized California public agencies to deposit public funds in...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized California public agencies to deposit public funds in savings and loan associations, expanding beyond the previous restriction to banks only.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 793, "fingerprint": "1976|CA771|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA771|Statewide", "content_hash": "68ec45bc3c594165", "measure_id": "CA771", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Tax Rates on Unsecured Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.90000153, "percent_no": 28.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established that tax rates on unsecured property (such as busine...", "summary_text": "This measure established that tax rates on unsecured property (such as business equipment and inventory) would be set at the same rate as secured property (real estate) within each tax jurisdiction. It standardized the taxation method for both secured and unsecured property across California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 792, "fingerprint": "1976|CA770|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA770|Statewide", "content_hash": "ce72ec5f6afa103b", "measure_id": "CA770", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Bingo", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.19999695, "percent_no": 29.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 791, "fingerprint": "1976|CA769|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA769|Statewide", "content_hash": "136b9dc4c7ae687d", "measure_id": "CA769", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Miscellaneous Constitutional Revisions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.59999847, "percent_no": 32.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1976 California ballot measure enacted various constitutional revisions ...", "summary_text": "This 1976 California ballot measure enacted various constitutional revisions of a miscellaneous nature. The measure passed with 67.6% voter approval but the specific changes are not detailed in the provided ballot text.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 790, "fingerprint": "1976|CA768|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA768|Statewide", "content_hash": "9c456779fd620e5d", "measure_id": "CA768", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Insurance Company Home Office Tax Deductin", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.0, "percent_no": 33.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure established a tax deduction for insurance companies relat...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure established a tax deduction for insurance companies related to their home office operations in California. The measure passed with 67% voter approval in 1976.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 789, "fingerprint": "1976|CA767|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA767|Statewide", "content_hash": "a9048b72bab6ecd9", "measure_id": "CA767", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "State Constitutional Offices. Filling Vacancies In. Confirmation.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.0, "percent_no": 34.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established procedures for filling vacancies in state constituti...", "summary_text": "This measure established procedures for filling vacancies in state constitutional offices and required confirmation of appointees. It gave the governor authority to appoint replacements for vacant constitutional offices, subject to legislative confirmation in some cases.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 788, "fingerprint": "1976|CA766|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA766|Statewide", "content_hash": "3ba47fd380832d4c", "measure_id": "CA766", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law of 1976", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.59999847, "percent_no": 37.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $175 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $175 million in general obligation bonds to fund water treatment facilities, distribution systems, and other infrastructure projects to provide safe drinking water to California communities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 787, "fingerprint": "1976|CA765|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA765|Statewide", "content_hash": "92e51b0e16ddc874", "measure_id": "CA765", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Veterans Bond Act of 1976", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.5, "percent_no": 37.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 786, "fingerprint": "1976|CA764|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA764|Statewide", "content_hash": "7ba4ac0790791438", "measure_id": "CA764", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Banks, Francisers, Corporations and Insurers - Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.40000153, "percent_no": 40.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed the state to impose income taxes on banks, franchisers, ...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed the state to impose income taxes on banks, franchisers, corporations, and insurance companies that were previously exempt from such taxation. It expanded California's tax base by removing certain corporate tax exemptions.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 785, "fingerprint": "1976|CA763|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA763|Statewide", "content_hash": "e11b1d118b3f3028", "measure_id": "CA763", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Property Tax Postponement", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.79999924, "percent_no": 44.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 784, "fingerprint": "1976|CA762|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA762|Statewide", "content_hash": "9c80683b87ef16e6", "measure_id": "CA762", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "University of California. Competitive Bidding. Grounds for Denial of Admission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.5, "percent_no": 45.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required the University of California to use competitive bidding...", "summary_text": "This measure required the University of California to use competitive bidding for construction contracts exceeding $15,000 and established specific grounds for denying student admissions based on academic qualifications and capacity limitations. It also prohibited the university from using admission criteria based on race, religion, sex, ethnicity, or national origin.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 783, "fingerprint": "1976|CA761|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA761|Statewide", "content_hash": "70e367150e8f0c28", "measure_id": "CA761", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Taxation of Restricted Historic Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.40000153, "percent_no": 45.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized local governments to create special tax assessment pr...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized local governments to create special tax assessment procedures for historically significant properties, allowing reduced property tax assessments in exchange for maintaining the historic character of the buildings. The measure aimed to provide financial incentives for property owners to preserve rather than demolish historic structures.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 782, "fingerprint": "1976|CA760|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA760|Statewide", "content_hash": "1da3b0b14e7970c3", "measure_id": "CA760", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "County Superintendents of Schools and Boards of Education", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.40000153, "percent_no": 46.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure changed how County Superintendents of Schools and Boards ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure changed how County Superintendents of Schools and Boards of Education in California are selected or governed, affecting their structure and administration at the county level.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 781, "fingerprint": "1976|CA759|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA759|Statewide", "content_hash": "323d6816cffdff02", "measure_id": "CA759", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Motor Vehicle Taxes - Local Surplus Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.79999924, "percent_no": 47.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed local governments to dispose of surplus property without...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed local governments to dispose of surplus property without state approval and reduced certain motor vehicle taxes while shifting some transportation funding responsibilities between state and local levels.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 780, "fingerprint": "1976|CA758|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA758|Statewide", "content_hash": "cec34450e2fb81b9", "measure_id": "CA758", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Nejedly-Hart State, Urban and Coastal Park Bond Act of 1976", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.5, "percent_no": 48.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $280 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $280 million in general obligation bonds to acquire, develop, and improve state parks, urban parks, coastal access areas, and recreational facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time with interest.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 779, "fingerprint": "1976|CA757|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA757|Statewide", "content_hash": "0bd69b8d3e84b5d3", "measure_id": "CA757", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Loans by State for Energy Conservation Improvements in Residential Structures", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.0, "percent_no": 51.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1976 California ballot measure would have authorized the state to provid...", "summary_text": "This 1976 California ballot measure would have authorized the state to provide loans to property owners for energy conservation improvements to residential buildings. The measure failed with 49.0% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 778, "fingerprint": "1976|CA756|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA756|Statewide", "content_hash": "7503be0ba2b5be96", "measure_id": "CA756", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "State School Building Lease-Purchase Bond Law of 1976", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.29999924, "percent_no": 52.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance school...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance school building construction and improvements through a lease-purchase arrangement. The bonds would have been repaid through lease payments made by school districts to the state.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 777, "fingerprint": "1976|CA755|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA755|Statewide", "content_hash": "4aa095bd36bf0f77", "measure_id": "CA755", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Interest Rates Allowable", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.0, "percent_no": 53.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 776, "fingerprint": "1976|CA754|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA754|Statewide", "content_hash": "b02dc6a75c68a232", "measure_id": "CA754", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Bonds to Refund State Indebtedness", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.40000153, "percent_no": 54.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Budgets\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to refinance exis...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to refinance existing state debt obligations. The refinancing was intended to potentially reduce interest costs or extend repayment terms on California's outstanding bonded indebtedness.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 775, "fingerprint": "1976|CA753|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA753|Statewide", "content_hash": "2fd61a702a7ed1f8", "measure_id": "CA753", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Bonds to Provide Community College Facilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.90000153, "percent_no": 56.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the co...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the construction and improvement of community college facilities across California. The bond funding would have supported infrastructure development for the state's community college system.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 774, "fingerprint": "1976|CA752|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA752|Statewide", "content_hash": "9baa1480d1f6f0e8", "measure_id": "CA752", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Interest Rate", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.70000076, "percent_no": 56.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 773, "fingerprint": "1976|CA751|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA751|Statewide", "content_hash": "ae4f02b9c59761c7", "measure_id": "CA751", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Bills and Statutes-Effective Date. Governor's Consideration. Referendum.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.20000076, "percent_no": 56.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required all bills passed by the California legislatu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required all bills passed by the California legislature to take effect 90 days after the legislative session ends, rather than immediately upon the governor's signature, and would have given the governor 60 days to consider bills before signing or vetoing them. It also would have provided additional time for citizens to petition for referendums on new laws.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 772, "fingerprint": "1976|CA750|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA750|Statewide", "content_hash": "44935fd6b1a52520", "measure_id": "CA750", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Housing Finance Bond Law of 1975", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.79999924, "percent_no": 57.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance housin...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance housing programs, including loans for home purchases and housing development projects. The bonds would have been repaid through revenues generated by the housing programs rather than general tax funds.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 771, "fingerprint": "1976|CA749|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA749|Statewide", "content_hash": "44e01b003682373a", "measure_id": "CA749", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Residential Energy Conservation Bond Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.40000153, "percent_no": 58.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to provide low-in...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to provide low-interest loans to property owners for installing energy conservation improvements in residential buildings. The program would have been funded through general obligation bonds repaid by taxpayers.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 770, "fingerprint": "1976|CA748|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA748|Statewide", "content_hash": "06206cf6cab308e5", "measure_id": "CA748", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Agricultural Labor Relations - Initiative Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.79999924, "percent_no": 62.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This initiative would have amended California's Agricultural Labor Relations ...", "summary_text": "This initiative would have amended California's Agricultural Labor Relations Act to require secret ballot elections for union representation, eliminate certain union organizing rights, and restrict boycotts and strikes by agricultural workers. The measure also would have prohibited mandatory union membership and dues collection for agricultural employees.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 769, "fingerprint": "1976|CA747|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA747|Statewide", "content_hash": "e3f7ae86bdc69c62", "measure_id": "CA747", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Nuclear Power Plants - Initiative Statute.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.5, "percent_no": 67.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Environmental Protection\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1976 California initiative would have imposed safety and regulatory rest...", "summary_text": "This 1976 California initiative would have imposed safety and regulatory restrictions on nuclear power plants, including requirements for legislative approval of new plants and stricter safety standards. The measure would have also established procedures for shutting down existing nuclear facilities if certain safety conditions were not met.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 768, "fingerprint": "1976|CA746|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1976|CA746|Statewide", "content_hash": "5c0a749c55f17f95", "measure_id": "CA746", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1976, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Greyhound Dog Racing - Initiative Statute", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 24.60000038, "percent_no": 75.39999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Gambling & Lotteries\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1976 California ballot measure would have legalized greyhound dog racing...", "summary_text": "This 1976 California ballot measure would have legalized greyhound dog racing in the state through an initiative statute. The measure failed with only 24.6% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1976)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201976", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201976", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 767, "fingerprint": "1974|CA745|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA745|Statewide", "content_hash": "abe093270631f15f", "measure_id": "CA745", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Property Tax Exemptions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 82.30000305, "percent_no": 17.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 766, "fingerprint": "1974|CA744|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA744|Statewide", "content_hash": "aac1605cde9195a4", "measure_id": "CA744", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Reassessment of Property in Event of Damage or Destruction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 79.0, "percent_no": 21.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed property to be reassessed at its current fair market val...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed property to be reassessed at its current fair market value when damaged or destroyed, rather than maintaining the pre-damage assessed value. It enabled property tax assessments to reflect the reduced value of damaged property.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 765, "fingerprint": "1974|CA743|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA743|Statewide", "content_hash": "087b68c3d8f25064", "measure_id": "CA743", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Public Legislative Proceedings", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 79.0, "percent_no": 21.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 764, "fingerprint": "1974|CA742|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA742|Statewide", "content_hash": "ad46dd89af517e57", "measure_id": "CA742", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Charters for Counties and Cities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.80000305, "percent_no": 27.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed counties and cities in California to adopt their own cha...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed counties and cities in California to adopt their own charters, giving them greater local control over municipal affairs and governance structures. It provided local governments with more autonomy to establish their own rules and procedures rather than being bound entirely by state-mandated frameworks.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 763, "fingerprint": "1974|CA741|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA741|Statewide", "content_hash": "56449f0dcadff622", "measure_id": "CA741", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Veterans Bond Act of 1974", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.30000305, "percent_no": 27.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 762, "fingerprint": "1974|CA740|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA740|Statewide", "content_hash": "d12d0cb217a2d5d8", "measure_id": "CA740", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Declaration of Rights", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.5, "percent_no": 29.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Criminal Justice | Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 761, "fingerprint": "1974|CA739|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA739|Statewide", "content_hash": "69eed2c0b134bc2c", "measure_id": "CA739", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Clean Water Bond Law of 1974", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.5, "percent_no": 29.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 760, "fingerprint": "1974|CA738|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA738|Statewide", "content_hash": "156d4c9d423c98c0", "measure_id": "CA738", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Political Reform Initiative", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.80000305, "percent_no": 30.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 759, "fingerprint": "1974|CA737|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA737|Statewide", "content_hash": "251d0828fae99e49", "measure_id": "CA737", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Public Utilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.0, "percent_no": 31.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 758, "fingerprint": "1974|CA736|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA736|Statewide", "content_hash": "379998f8695b54e3", "measure_id": "CA736", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Taxation and State Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.40000153, "percent_no": 31.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 757, "fingerprint": "1974|CA735|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA735|Statewide", "content_hash": "73ac8f9056146dbf", "measure_id": "CA735", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "San Diego County Judicial Districts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.40000153, "percent_no": 33.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure restructured the judicial districts in San Diego County, ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure restructured the judicial districts in San Diego County, likely changing the boundaries or organization of court jurisdictions within the county. The measure passed with 66.4% voter approval in 1974.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 756, "fingerprint": "1974|CA734|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA734|Statewide", "content_hash": "53f4caab31dc0105", "measure_id": "CA734", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Sacramento County-Cities Consolidation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.59999847, "percent_no": 38.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the consolidation of Sacramento County with the citie...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the consolidation of Sacramento County with the cities within it into a single governmental entity. The consolidation would have combined the county and municipal governments into one unified local government structure.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 755, "fingerprint": "1974|CA733|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA733|Statewide", "content_hash": "e896cb079d9c4242", "measure_id": "CA733", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Recall of Public Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.40000153, "percent_no": 38.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 754, "fingerprint": "1974|CA732|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA732|Statewide", "content_hash": "4b93750d80234954", "measure_id": "CA732", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Residence of Local Government Employee", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.5, "percent_no": 39.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would allow local government employees to live outside the juris...", "summary_text": "This measure would allow local government employees to live outside the jurisdiction where they work, overriding local residency requirements that mandated public employees reside within the city or county that employs them.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 753, "fingerprint": "1974|CA731|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA731|Statewide", "content_hash": "e4bb5079343449c6", "measure_id": "CA731", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Highways and Mass Transit Guideways", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.29999924, "percent_no": 39.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance construction of h...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance construction of highways and mass transit guideways. It allowed California to borrow money for transportation infrastructure projects including both road and public transit systems.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 752, "fingerprint": "1974|CA730|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA730|Statewide", "content_hash": "9bb137d5c61f1fc0", "measure_id": "CA730", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "State School Building Aid and Earthquake Reconstruction and Replacement Bond Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.09999847, "percent_no": 39.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to provide funding for schoo...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to provide funding for school construction, renovation, and earthquake-related reconstruction and replacement of school buildings. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 751, "fingerprint": "1974|CA729|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA729|Statewide", "content_hash": "514791a4a5c727d9", "measure_id": "CA729", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Recreational Lands Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.90000153, "percent_no": 40.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 750, "fingerprint": "1974|CA728|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA728|Statewide", "content_hash": "e12ee88d6b7423dd", "measure_id": "CA728", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Right to Vote", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.29999924, "percent_no": 43.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 749, "fingerprint": "1974|CA727|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA727|Statewide", "content_hash": "a398f060262975b5", "measure_id": "CA727", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Regents, University of California", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.29999924, "percent_no": 44.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure addressed the governance structure of the University of Californ...", "summary_text": "This measure addressed the governance structure of the University of California Board of Regents. It established specific provisions regarding the composition, terms, or appointment procedures for the UC Regents who oversee the university system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 748, "fingerprint": "1974|CA726|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA726|Statewide", "content_hash": "db1fd742ca3da977", "measure_id": "CA726", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Miscellaneous Language Changes Regarding Gender", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.40000153, "percent_no": 49.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure updated California's constitution and statutes to use gender-neu...", "summary_text": "This measure updated California's constitution and statutes to use gender-neutral language, replacing masculine pronouns and gendered terms with inclusive alternatives where appropriate. The changes were primarily linguistic and did not alter the substantive rights or duties described in the affected laws.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 747, "fingerprint": "1974|CA725|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA725|Statewide", "content_hash": "a3237c69a82e6c17", "measure_id": "CA725", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "State College System", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.20000076, "percent_no": 50.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 746, "fingerprint": "1974|CA724|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA724|Statewide", "content_hash": "c6dfd4d2de70b686", "measure_id": "CA724", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "State Civil Service Exemptions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.20000076, "percent_no": 52.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 745, "fingerprint": "1974|CA723|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA723|Statewide", "content_hash": "b97b832655742c0d", "measure_id": "CA723", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Wild and Scenic Rivers Initiative", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.09999847, "percent_no": 52.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1974 California ballot measure would have designated certain rivers and ...", "summary_text": "This 1974 California ballot measure would have designated certain rivers and river segments as \"wild and scenic\" to protect them from development and preserve their natural characteristics. The initiative would have established a state wild and scenic rivers system with restrictions on dam construction, mining, and other activities along protected waterways.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 744, "fingerprint": "1974|CA722|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA722|Statewide", "content_hash": "96ee9dafffe8c2b1", "measure_id": "CA722", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Postsecondary Education Commission Personnel - Civil Service", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.09999847, "percent_no": 56.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed | Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have placed personnel of the California Postsecondary Educ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have placed personnel of the California Postsecondary Education Commission under the state civil service system. It failed with 43.1% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 743, "fingerprint": "1974|CA721|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA721|Statewide", "content_hash": "7c562e42484223f5", "measure_id": "CA721", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Student Tuition, University of California", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.09999847, "percent_no": 57.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1974 California ballot measure would have allowed the University of Cali...", "summary_text": "This 1974 California ballot measure would have allowed the University of California system to charge tuition to students, ending the state's policy of providing tuition-free education at UC campuses. The measure failed with 42.1% of voters supporting the change.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 742, "fingerprint": "1974|CA720|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1974|CA720|Statewide", "content_hash": "c6964f1991d7633d", "measure_id": "CA720", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1974, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Low Rent Housing", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.70000076, "percent_no": 61.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1974)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201974", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201974", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 741, "fingerprint": "1973|CA719|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1973|CA719|Statewide", "content_hash": "e956cbe807b9a77d", "measure_id": "CA719", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1973, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Tax and Expenditure Limitations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.0, "percent_no": 54.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed limits on California's state and local govern...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed limits on California's state and local government spending and taxation, restricting their ability to increase taxes and expenditures beyond specified thresholds. The measure failed with 46% voter approval.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1973)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201973", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201973", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 740, "fingerprint": "1972|CA718|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA718|Statewide", "content_hash": "49f935543c445858", "measure_id": "CA718", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Disabled Veterans Tax Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 89.69999695, "percent_no": 10.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure provides property tax exemptions for disabled veterans in Califo...", "summary_text": "This measure provides property tax exemptions for disabled veterans in California. The exemption applies to veterans with service-connected disabilities as determined by federal standards.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 739, "fingerprint": "1972|CA717|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA717|Statewide", "content_hash": "ea4e27581fc6e526", "measure_id": "CA717", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Blind Veterans Tax Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 89.40000153, "percent_no": 10.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 738, "fingerprint": "1972|CA716|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA716|Statewide", "content_hash": "eec942eddf502755", "measure_id": "CA716", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Chiropractors", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.59999847, "percent_no": 26.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 737, "fingerprint": "1972|CA715|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA715|Statewide", "content_hash": "0aed9fcd9c8175fc", "measure_id": "CA715", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Workmen's Compensation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.59999847, "percent_no": 27.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 736, "fingerprint": "1972|CA714|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA714|Statewide", "content_hash": "4e6faf4db3069f2f", "measure_id": "CA714", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Elections and Presidential Primary", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.30000305, "percent_no": 31.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed California's presidential primary election from June to ...", "summary_text": "This measure changed California's presidential primary election from June to March and modified certain election procedures and requirements for presidential candidates.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 735, "fingerprint": "1972|CA713|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA713|Statewide", "content_hash": "cfbf27a67953e49f", "measure_id": "CA713", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Valuation of Single-Family Dwellings for Tax Purposes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.80000305, "percent_no": 32.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required that single-family dwellings be assessed for property t...", "summary_text": "This measure required that single-family dwellings be assessed for property tax purposes based on their value as homes rather than their potential commercial or developmental value. It aimed to prevent homeowners from being taxed out of their properties due to rising land values in areas undergoing commercial development.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 734, "fingerprint": "1972|CA712|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA712|Statewide", "content_hash": "02f90ba53f1fdb92", "measure_id": "CA712", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Death Penalty", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.5, "percent_no": 32.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 733, "fingerprint": "1972|CA711|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA711|Statewide", "content_hash": "39581d41043133e4", "measure_id": "CA711", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Miscellaneous Constitutional Revisions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.0, "percent_no": 34.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1972 California ballot measure made various unspecified revisions to the...", "summary_text": "This 1972 California ballot measure made various unspecified revisions to the state constitution. The measure passed with 66% of the vote but the specific changes are not detailed in the provided ballot text.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 732, "fingerprint": "1972|CA710|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA710|Statewide", "content_hash": "70653145c96ade10", "measure_id": "CA710", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Partial Constitutional Revision", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.80000305, "percent_no": 34.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure implemented a partial revision of the California Constitution, u...", "summary_text": "This measure implemented a partial revision of the California Constitution, updating and reorganizing various sections of the state's governing document. The revision passed with 65.8% voter approval in 1972.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 731, "fingerprint": "1972|CA709|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA709|Statewide", "content_hash": "14ef33b041b06306", "measure_id": "CA709", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "The Veterans Bond Act of 1971", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.5, "percent_no": 34.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 730, "fingerprint": "1972|CA708|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA708|Statewide", "content_hash": "57cac3bb8abb8601", "measure_id": "CA708", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Assignment of Students to Schools", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.09999847, "percent_no": 36.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure prohibited the assignment of students to schools based on their ...", "summary_text": "This measure prohibited the assignment of students to schools based on their race, creed, color, or national origin. It effectively banned court-ordered busing programs that were being used to desegregate California schools.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 729, "fingerprint": "1972|CA707|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA707|Statewide", "content_hash": "7537b5a40f7c1ead", "measure_id": "CA707", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Right of Privacy", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.90000153, "percent_no": 37.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 728, "fingerprint": "1972|CA706|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA706|Statewide", "content_hash": "7f368f8ff6855e8e", "measure_id": "CA706", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Open Presidential Primary", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.40000153, "percent_no": 38.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 727, "fingerprint": "1972|CA705|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA705|Statewide", "content_hash": "f2baf5f7f9ce027f", "measure_id": "CA705", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Appointment of Regents, University of California", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.20000076, "percent_no": 38.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the method of appointing University of California Regent...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the method of appointing University of California Regents from lifetime appointments to 12-year terms and modified the composition of the Board of Regents. It also established new procedures for regent selection and governance of the UC system.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 726, "fingerprint": "1972|CA704|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA704|Statewide", "content_hash": "bf50f9c90b988e9c", "measure_id": "CA704", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Legislative Reorganization", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.90000153, "percent_no": 39.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 725, "fingerprint": "1972|CA703|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA703|Statewide", "content_hash": "3000f3754093b2a7", "measure_id": "CA703", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Bonds to Provide Health Science Facilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.0, "percent_no": 40.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the construction and...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the construction and improvement of health science facilities, including medical and dental schools, hospitals, and related educational infrastructure. The bonds would be repaid through general state revenues over time.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 724, "fingerprint": "1972|CA702|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA702|Statewide", "content_hash": "0765329698b5275a", "measure_id": "CA702", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Naturalized Citizen Voting Eligibility", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.40000153, "percent_no": 40.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure established that naturalized citizens have the same votin...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure established that naturalized citizens have the same voting rights and eligibility as natural-born citizens in California elections. It removed any distinctions between naturalized and native-born citizens regarding their ability to participate in the state's electoral process.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 723, "fingerprint": "1972|CA701|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA701|Statewide", "content_hash": "67f0c4c67a201630", "measure_id": "CA701", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "School Districts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.59999847, "percent_no": 41.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 722, "fingerprint": "1972|CA700|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA700|Statewide", "content_hash": "7e2daee0e7df581d", "measure_id": "CA700", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Bonds to Provide Public Community College Facilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.90000153, "percent_no": 43.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the construction ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the construction and improvement of public community college facilities across California. The bonds would provide funding for capital projects at community colleges throughout the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 721, "fingerprint": "1972|CA699|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA699|Statewide", "content_hash": "4df406fe602c28e0", "measure_id": "CA699", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Coastal Zone Conservation Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.20000076, "percent_no": 44.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 720, "fingerprint": "1972|CA698|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA698|Statewide", "content_hash": "95c43d32a67e1860", "measure_id": "CA698", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Bond Vote for Structurally Unsafe School Buildings", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.5, "percent_no": 45.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to provide funding for the r...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to provide funding for the repair, reconstruction, or replacement of school buildings that were deemed structurally unsafe. The bonds would be repaid through general state revenues over time.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 719, "fingerprint": "1972|CA697|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA697|Statewide", "content_hash": "9e05d455447e660a", "measure_id": "CA697", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "The State School Building Aid and Earthquake Reconstruction and Replacement Bond Law of 1972", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.79999924, "percent_no": 46.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $550 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $550 million in general obligation bonds to fund school construction, reconstruction, and earthquake safety improvements for public educational facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 718, "fingerprint": "1972|CA696|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA696|Statewide", "content_hash": "d621f29fba2ebcc5", "measure_id": "CA696", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Right to Assistance of Counsel", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.79999924, "percent_no": 48.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 717, "fingerprint": "1972|CA695|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA695|Statewide", "content_hash": "4b29ec6e05e38b36", "measure_id": "CA695", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Environmental Pollution Bond Authorization", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.5, "percent_no": 48.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Environmental Protection\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized California to issue bonds to fund environmental pollu...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized California to issue bonds to fund environmental pollution control and cleanup projects. The bonds would provide financing for state and local programs aimed at reducing pollution and protecting environmental quality.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 716, "fingerprint": "1972|CA694|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA694|Statewide", "content_hash": "101d45be4187e57b", "measure_id": "CA694", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Agricultural Labor Relations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.09999847, "percent_no": 57.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 715, "fingerprint": "1972|CA693|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA693|Statewide", "content_hash": "cfe05d1c09997034", "measure_id": "CA693", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Salaries, California Highway Patrol", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.09999847, "percent_no": 60.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a specific salary schedule for California...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a specific salary schedule for California Highway Patrol officers through the state constitution. It failed with 39.1% voter approval in 1972.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 714, "fingerprint": "1972|CA692|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA692|Statewide", "content_hash": "10b10a8c349734ba", "measure_id": "CA692", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Clean Environment Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.29999924, "percent_no": 64.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Energy & Electric Utilities\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 713, "fingerprint": "1972|CA691|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA691|Statewide", "content_hash": "ba6cb68de2c65c14", "measure_id": "CA691", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Property Tax Limitations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.09999847, "percent_no": 65.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 712, "fingerprint": "1972|CA690|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA690|Statewide", "content_hash": "69f98e4bee15b708", "measure_id": "CA690", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Marijuana - Removal of Penalty for Personal Use", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 33.5, "percent_no": 66.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have removed criminal penalties for the personal use of ma...", "summary_text": "This measure would have removed criminal penalties for the personal use of marijuana in California. It would have eliminated prosecution and punishment for individuals possessing or using marijuana for personal consumption.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 711, "fingerprint": "1972|CA689|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA689|Statewide", "content_hash": "853cf62947f1ee39", "measure_id": "CA689", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "State Employee Salaries", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.5, "percent_no": 67.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 710, "fingerprint": "1972|CA688|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA688|Statewide", "content_hash": "d66eb2c077d53237", "measure_id": "CA688", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Obscenity Legislation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.09999847, "percent_no": 67.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 709, "fingerprint": "1972|CA687|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1972|CA687|Statewide", "content_hash": "991756d462f3910e", "measure_id": "CA687", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1972, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Tax Exemption for Anti-Pollution Facilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.10000038, "percent_no": 72.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have provided tax exemptions for facilities and equ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have provided tax exemptions for facilities and equipment designed to reduce or control pollution. The measure failed with only 27.1% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1972)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201972", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201972", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 708, "fingerprint": "1970|CA686|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA686|Statewide", "content_hash": "2836f1f2b1803ceb", "measure_id": "CA686", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Tax Exemption for Disabled Veterans and Blind Veterans", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 83.5, "percent_no": 16.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure granted property tax exemptions to disabled veterans and blind v...", "summary_text": "This measure granted property tax exemptions to disabled veterans and blind veterans in California. It passed with 83.5% voter approval in 1970.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 707, "fingerprint": "1970|CA685|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA685|Statewide", "content_hash": "e79f6a0e0d86c9e3", "measure_id": "CA685", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1-G", "description": "The Clean Water Bond Law of 1970", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.40000153, "percent_no": 24.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $250 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $250 million in general obligation bonds to fund water pollution control facilities and programs. The bonds would finance construction of sewage treatment plants, water recycling systems, and other infrastructure to reduce water contamination throughout California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 706, "fingerprint": "1970|CA684|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA684|Statewide", "content_hash": "bddfc8089f435c93", "measure_id": "CA684", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Usury", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.59999847, "percent_no": 28.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 705, "fingerprint": "1970|CA683|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA683|Statewide", "content_hash": "9d364daa7c1623f8", "measure_id": "CA683", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Partial Constitutional Revision: Social Welfare", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.69999695, "percent_no": 30.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure revised California's constitution to establish social welfare as...", "summary_text": "This measure revised California's constitution to establish social welfare as a state responsibility and created a framework for providing aid to needy individuals and families. It authorized the state to provide various forms of public assistance and social services while establishing eligibility requirements and administrative structures for welfare programs.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 704, "fingerprint": "1970|CA682|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA682|Statewide", "content_hash": "67577dccf0c50542", "measure_id": "CA682", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Chiropractors: Rules", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.30000305, "percent_no": 30.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 703, "fingerprint": "1970|CA681|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA681|Statewide", "content_hash": "ff762e588b140005", "measure_id": "CA681", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6-G", "description": "Teachers' Retirement Fund: Investments", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.19999695, "percent_no": 31.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed the California Teachers' Retirement Fund to invest in co...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed the California Teachers' Retirement Fund to invest in corporate stocks and other equity securities. Previously, the fund was restricted to more conservative investments such as government bonds and certain fixed-income securities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 702, "fingerprint": "1970|CA680|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA680|Statewide", "content_hash": "72f3d00d7c8d9f30", "measure_id": "CA680", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5-G", "description": "Regents, University of California: Public Meetings", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.40000153, "percent_no": 32.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Education: Higher Ed | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required the University of California Board of Regents to hold t...", "summary_text": "This measure required the University of California Board of Regents to hold their meetings in public rather than in private sessions. It made the Regents subject to the state's open meeting laws that apply to other public bodies.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 701, "fingerprint": "1970|CA679|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA679|Statewide", "content_hash": "1a7375ca9a4e9c4a", "measure_id": "CA679", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "The Recreation and Fish and Wildlife Enhancement Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.70000076, "percent_no": 43.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund recreation facilitie...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund recreation facilities and fish and wildlife enhancement projects. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 700, "fingerprint": "1970|CA678|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA678|Statewide", "content_hash": "9f682059dbc2d110", "measure_id": "CA678", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7-P", "description": "Interest Rate on State Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.20000076, "percent_no": 43.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 699, "fingerprint": "1970|CA677|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA677|Statewide", "content_hash": "f5f8d2dc93ffa4f2", "measure_id": "CA677", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6-P", "description": "State and County Boards of Education: Textbooks", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.20000076, "percent_no": 44.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed state and county boards of education to adopt textbooks ...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed state and county boards of education to adopt textbooks for use in public schools, expanding their authority over curriculum materials selection. It gave these educational governing bodies the power to choose and approve textbooks that would be used in California's public school system.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 698, "fingerprint": "1970|CA676|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA676|Statewide", "content_hash": "0430b4fde0de6e44", "measure_id": "CA676", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3-G", "description": "State Budget", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.90000153, "percent_no": 45.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 697, "fingerprint": "1970|CA675|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA675|Statewide", "content_hash": "0d87068915f5f67e", "measure_id": "CA675", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "State Civil Service", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.5, "percent_no": 45.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 696, "fingerprint": "1970|CA674|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA674|Statewide", "content_hash": "2ddc8e22370876aa", "measure_id": "CA674", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2-P", "description": "Partial Constitutional Revision: Local Government", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.20000076, "percent_no": 48.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure revised portions of the California Constitution related to local...", "summary_text": "This measure revised portions of the California Constitution related to local government structure and operations. It updated and modernized constitutional provisions governing cities, counties, and other local governmental entities.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 695, "fingerprint": "1970|CA673|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA673|Statewide", "content_hash": "b2be8de8cac8b6f6", "measure_id": "CA673", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Constitutional Amendments", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.09999847, "percent_no": 48.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 694, "fingerprint": "1970|CA672|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA672|Statewide", "content_hash": "61b7b186db16f88b", "measure_id": "CA672", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Compensation of County Supervisors", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.59999847, "percent_no": 49.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized counties to set compensation for county supervisors b...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized counties to set compensation for county supervisors based on the population of the county, allowing for higher pay in more populous counties. It replaced the previous system that set uniform compensation limits for all county supervisors regardless of county size.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 693, "fingerprint": "1970|CA671|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA671|Statewide", "content_hash": "e1c001f79fb31ab0", "measure_id": "CA671", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7-G", "description": "State Colleges: Speaker Member of Governing Body", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.40000153, "percent_no": 49.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure allowed the Speaker of the California State Assembly to s...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure allowed the Speaker of the California State Assembly to serve as a member of the governing body of state colleges. The measure passed by a narrow margin with 50.4% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 692, "fingerprint": "1970|CA670|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA670|Statewide", "content_hash": "821321efb11da61c", "measure_id": "CA670", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2-G", "description": "Vacancies in Specified Constitutional Offices", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.0, "percent_no": 51.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required the Governor to fill vacancies in specified ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required the Governor to fill vacancies in specified constitutional offices (such as Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, and other statewide elected positions) by appointing someone from the same political party as the previous officeholder. The appointee would serve until the next general election when voters could elect a permanent replacement.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 691, "fingerprint": "1970|CA669|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA669|Statewide", "content_hash": "ada19dfb5b65d78e", "measure_id": "CA669", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4-P", "description": "Partial Constitutional Revision: Various", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.5, "percent_no": 51.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have implemented various changes to the California Constit...", "summary_text": "This measure would have implemented various changes to the California Constitution as part of a partial constitutional revision. The specific details of what constitutional provisions would have been modified are not specified in the available ballot text.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 690, "fingerprint": "1970|CA668|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA668|Statewide", "content_hash": "a164cdba7e970890", "measure_id": "CA668", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5-P", "description": "Partial Constitutional Revision: Future Constitutional Amendments, State Civil Service", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.5, "percent_no": 51.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Labor & Employment | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have revised the California Constitution to change ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have revised the California Constitution to change the process for future constitutional amendments and modify the state civil service system. The measure failed with 48.5% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 689, "fingerprint": "1970|CA667|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA667|Statewide", "content_hash": "23b8c3e530491148", "measure_id": "CA667", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4-G", "description": "Appropriation for Public Schools", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.90000153, "percent_no": 53.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1970 California ballot measure would have provided additional state fund...", "summary_text": "This 1970 California ballot measure would have provided additional state funding or appropriations for public schools. The measure failed to pass, receiving 46.9% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 688, "fingerprint": "1970|CA666|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA666|Statewide", "content_hash": "fa88e4ff48b03632", "measure_id": "CA666", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "County Superintendents of Schools", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.20000076, "percent_no": 53.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required county superintendents of schools to be elec...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required county superintendents of schools to be elected by voters in their counties. County superintendents of schools were previously appointed rather than elected positions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 687, "fingerprint": "1970|CA665|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA665|Statewide", "content_hash": "6d51d2f591fa8eb3", "measure_id": "CA665", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Motor Vehicle Taxation Revenues", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.90000153, "percent_no": 54.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required that all state motor vehicle taxation revenu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required that all state motor vehicle taxation revenues be used exclusively for highway and road purposes, preventing the state from using these funds for other programs or general government operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 686, "fingerprint": "1970|CA664|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA664|Statewide", "content_hash": "9ff2ecd7d7d856f4", "measure_id": "CA664", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1-P", "description": "University of California Health Science Facilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.0, "percent_no": 55.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have authorized the University of California to iss...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have authorized the University of California to issue bonds to finance the construction and improvement of health science facilities, including medical schools, hospitals, and research centers. The measure failed with 45% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 685, "fingerprint": "1970|CA663|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA663|Statewide", "content_hash": "7d00f9becb085306", "measure_id": "CA663", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Interest Rate Limitation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.90000153, "percent_no": 55.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 684, "fingerprint": "1970|CA662|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA662|Statewide", "content_hash": "4e3082543d61fdbf", "measure_id": "CA662", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8-G", "description": "Superintendent of Public Instruction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.90000153, "percent_no": 60.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have made the position of Superintendent of Public ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have made the position of Superintendent of Public Instruction an appointed rather than elected position. The change would have removed this office from the direct election process in California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 683, "fingerprint": "1970|CA661|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA661|Statewide", "content_hash": "a03534314e73cf9b", "measure_id": "CA661", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8-P", "description": "Taxation for Schools and Social Welfare", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 28.5, "percent_no": 71.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to require that a...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to require that all property tax revenue be used exclusively for funding public schools and social welfare programs. It would have prohibited the use of property tax funds for any other government services or purposes.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 682, "fingerprint": "1970|CA660|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1970|CA660|Statewide", "content_hash": "bbae00799c29be5d", "measure_id": "CA660", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1970, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3-P", "description": "Partial Constitutional Revision: Public Utilities, Corporations and Water Use", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 22.79999924, "percent_no": 77.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Civil & Constitutional Law | Energy & Electric Utilities | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have revised California's constitution regarding th...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have revised California's constitution regarding the regulation of public utilities, corporations, and water usage rights. The measure proposed changes to how these entities would be governed and regulated under state law.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1970, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1970)", "confidence": "high", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201970", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201970", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 681, "fingerprint": "1968|CA659|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA659|Statewide", "content_hash": "890c625ab8de3c28", "measure_id": "CA659", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1-P", "description": "The Veterans Bond Act of 1968", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.79999924, "percent_no": 38.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 680, "fingerprint": "1968|CA658|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA658|Statewide", "content_hash": "7e2e06c2c7b6b245", "measure_id": "CA658", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2-P", "description": "Junior College Construction Bond Act of 1968", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.59999847, "percent_no": 43.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $250 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $250 million in general obligation bonds to fund construction and improvement of junior college facilities throughout California. The bonds would be repaid through state tax revenues over time.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 679, "fingerprint": "1968|CA657|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA657|Statewide", "content_hash": "a9510527ed14cfc2", "measure_id": "CA657", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "State Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.20000076, "percent_no": 44.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 678, "fingerprint": "1968|CA656|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA656|Statewide", "content_hash": "90e30c123f1c1249", "measure_id": "CA656", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Hospital Loans", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.70000076, "percent_no": 45.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 677, "fingerprint": "1968|CA655|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA655|Statewide", "content_hash": "557a2698c5b8d952", "measure_id": "CA655", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1A-G", "description": "Homeowners' Property Tax Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.40000153, "percent_no": 46.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure provided a property tax exemption for homeowners on their primar...", "summary_text": "This measure provided a property tax exemption for homeowners on their primary residences in California. The exemption reduced the assessed value of owner-occupied homes for property tax purposes, lowering tax bills for qualifying homeowners.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1A-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1A_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201A%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201A%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 676, "fingerprint": "1968|CA654|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA654|Statewide", "content_hash": "79e7f12bac4e8d3c", "measure_id": "CA654", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Apportionment of Local Sales and Use Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.20000076, "percent_no": 48.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed how local sales and use tax revenue is distributed among...", "summary_text": "This measure changed how local sales and use tax revenue is distributed among jurisdictions in California. It established new apportionment rules for allocating these tax proceeds to local governments.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 675, "fingerprint": "1968|CA653|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA653|Statewide", "content_hash": "b06e00cc81ee5ed9", "measure_id": "CA653", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2-G", "description": "Taxation of Publicly Owned Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.5, "percent_no": 49.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would allow the state legislature to authorize taxation of publi...", "summary_text": "This measure would allow the state legislature to authorize taxation of publicly owned property that is leased to private parties for private use. It passed with 50.5% of the vote, enabling potential tax revenue from public property used commercially by private entities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 674, "fingerprint": "1968|CA652|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA652|Statewide", "content_hash": "c8e0d62a27c18bad", "measure_id": "CA652", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Personal Income Taxes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.5, "percent_no": 52.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 673, "fingerprint": "1968|CA651|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA651|Statewide", "content_hash": "540339bfd29243ac", "measure_id": "CA651", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Bonds to Provide State College, University and Urban School Facilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.59999847, "percent_no": 55.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construct...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construction and improvement of facilities at state colleges, universities, and urban schools. The bonds would have provided financing for educational infrastructure development across California's public higher education and urban school systems.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 672, "fingerprint": "1968|CA650|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA650|Statewide", "content_hash": "845aca3da8fa9daa", "measure_id": "CA650", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Insurance Companies: Gross Premium Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.5, "percent_no": 55.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have imposed a gross premium tax on insurance companies op...", "summary_text": "This measure would have imposed a gross premium tax on insurance companies operating in California. The tax would have been levied on the total premiums collected by insurance companies from their policyholders in the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 671, "fingerprint": "1968|CA649|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA649|Statewide", "content_hash": "699db66835d92d1e", "measure_id": "CA649", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1-G", "description": "Constitutional Revision", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.0, "percent_no": 57.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 670, "fingerprint": "1968|CA648|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1968|CA648|Statewide", "content_hash": "c827b1c5e59ad58b", "measure_id": "CA648", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1968, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Taxation: Limitation on Property Tax Rate", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.0, "percent_no": 68.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have limited property tax rates in California to a maximum...", "summary_text": "This measure would have limited property tax rates in California to a maximum of 1.5% of assessed value. It would have required voter approval for any property tax rate increases above this limit.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1968)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201968", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201968", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 669, "fingerprint": "1966|CA647|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA647|Statewide", "content_hash": "d43a9bac17f39141", "measure_id": "CA647", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Veterans' Tax Exemption for Blind Veterans", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 89.30000305, "percent_no": 10.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure provided a property tax exemption for veterans who are blind", "summary_text": "This ballot measure provided a property tax exemption for veterans who are blind. It passed with 89.3% of the vote in 1966.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 668, "fingerprint": "1966|CA646|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA646|Statewide", "content_hash": "a3b3320b73d8acf8", "measure_id": "CA646", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Boxing and Wrestling Contests", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.59999847, "percent_no": 26.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 667, "fingerprint": "1966|CA645|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA645|Statewide", "content_hash": "9d23734752f806bb", "measure_id": "CA645", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1a", "description": "Constitutional Revision", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.5, "percent_no": 26.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Judiciary | Legislatures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1a", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1a_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201a%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201a%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 666, "fingerprint": "1966|CA644|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA644|Statewide", "content_hash": "74a412bcc575a5fe", "measure_id": "CA644", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "County Assessment Appeals Boards", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.40000153, "percent_no": 26.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established county assessment appeals boards to hear property ta...", "summary_text": "This measure established county assessment appeals boards to hear property tax assessment appeals, replacing the previous system where county boards of supervisors handled these appeals directly.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 665, "fingerprint": "1966|CA643|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA643|Statewide", "content_hash": "307d1fa3089a39c2", "measure_id": "CA643", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Property Tax Statement", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.19999695, "percent_no": 28.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 664, "fingerprint": "1966|CA642|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA642|Statewide", "content_hash": "9dfad1b1aa6e0a6a", "measure_id": "CA642", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Legislative Procedure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.20000076, "percent_no": 38.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 663, "fingerprint": "1966|CA641|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA641|Statewide", "content_hash": "f075f3976a772c8f", "measure_id": "CA641", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1-P", "description": "State School Building Aid Bond Law of 1966", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.59999847, "percent_no": 39.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $250 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $250 million in general obligation bonds to provide financial assistance to local school districts for construction and improvement of school buildings and facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 662, "fingerprint": "1966|CA640|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA640|Statewide", "content_hash": "a3877f0e6c9a7e84", "measure_id": "CA640", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1-G", "description": "Public Retirement Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.59999847, "percent_no": 40.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Local Government | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 661, "fingerprint": "1966|CA639|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA639|Statewide", "content_hash": "81641efab460451d", "measure_id": "CA639", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Taxation: Insurance Companies; Home or Principal Office Deduction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.79999924, "percent_no": 43.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would allow insurance companies to deduct expenses relate...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would allow insurance companies to deduct expenses related to their home or principal office when calculating their California taxes. The measure modifies the state's taxation system for insurance companies by providing this specific deduction.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 660, "fingerprint": "1966|CA638|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA638|Statewide", "content_hash": "e8c0de1dd8492674", "measure_id": "CA638", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Bonds to Provide State College and University Facilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.09999847, "percent_no": 43.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the construction ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the construction and improvement of facilities at California's state colleges and universities. The bonds would provide funding for building new educational infrastructure and upgrading existing facilities within the state's higher education system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 659, "fingerprint": "1966|CA637|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA637|Statewide", "content_hash": "a68ed3ecf46c0232", "measure_id": "CA637", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Open Space Conservation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.5, "percent_no": 44.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 658, "fingerprint": "1966|CA636|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA636|Statewide", "content_hash": "f3b29c3d975b4147", "measure_id": "CA636", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Property Taxation: Relief in Event of Disaster", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.90000153, "percent_no": 49.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure provides property tax relief for property owners whose real prop...", "summary_text": "This measure provides property tax relief for property owners whose real property is damaged or destroyed by natural disasters or other calamities. It allows for reduced property tax assessments based on the diminished value of the damaged property.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 657, "fingerprint": "1966|CA635|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA635|Statewide", "content_hash": "31c5ed597b48954d", "measure_id": "CA635", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Personal Income Taxes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.40000153, "percent_no": 51.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 656, "fingerprint": "1966|CA634|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA634|Statewide", "content_hash": "2ccad4d7a431d720", "measure_id": "CA634", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Indebtedness of Local Agencies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.90000153, "percent_no": 53.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 655, "fingerprint": "1966|CA633|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA633|Statewide", "content_hash": "e912304aa485299a", "measure_id": "CA633", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Eligibility to Vote", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.90000153, "percent_no": 56.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 654, "fingerprint": "1966|CA632|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA632|Statewide", "content_hash": "a6a2c0ddbfffb80c", "measure_id": "CA632", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Obscenity", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.59999847, "percent_no": 56.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 653, "fingerprint": "1966|CA631|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA631|Statewide", "content_hash": "9f6bd78b74667429", "measure_id": "CA631", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Loan of Public Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.0, "percent_no": 60.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 652, "fingerprint": "1966|CA630|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1966|CA630|Statewide", "content_hash": "8fc28b79c382aadd", "measure_id": "CA630", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1966, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Compensation of County Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 28.29999924, "percent_no": 71.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1966 California ballot measure would have established new compensation s...", "summary_text": "This 1966 California ballot measure would have established new compensation structures for county officers throughout the state. The measure failed to pass with 28.3% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1966)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201966", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201966", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 651, "fingerprint": "1964|CA629|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA629|Statewide", "content_hash": "30c0136d874a0194", "measure_id": "CA629", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Bonds to Provide State College", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 94.90000153, "percent_no": 5.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 650, "fingerprint": "1964|CA628|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA628|Statewide", "content_hash": "b51012e1da7a92e3", "measure_id": "CA628", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Taxation: Retaliatory Tax on Out of State Insurers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 78.90000153, "percent_no": 21.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized California to impose retaliatory taxes on insurance c...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized California to impose retaliatory taxes on insurance companies from other states that tax California insurers at rates higher than California's standard insurance tax rates. The retaliatory tax would match the excess tax burden that other states impose on California-based insurance companies operating in their jurisdictions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 649, "fingerprint": "1964|CA627|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA627|Statewide", "content_hash": "e036bb82a2f1315b", "measure_id": "CA627", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "County Supervisorial District Boundaries", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 76.40000153, "percent_no": 23.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed counties to establish supervisorial district boundaries ...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed counties to establish supervisorial district boundaries that do not have substantially equal populations, providing an exception to the general requirement for equal representation in local government districts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 648, "fingerprint": "1964|CA626|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA626|Statewide", "content_hash": "88d0c451343bfcef", "measure_id": "CA626", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Permanence of Municipal Functions by County Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.5, "percent_no": 27.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would make certain municipal functions performed by county offic...", "summary_text": "This measure would make certain municipal functions performed by county officers permanent rather than temporary arrangements. It would establish a stable framework for counties to continue providing specific services to municipalities on an ongoing basis.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 647, "fingerprint": "1964|CA625|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA625|Statewide", "content_hash": "0f2a87ecd65066a3", "measure_id": "CA625", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "State School Building Aid Bond Law of 1964", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.40000153, "percent_no": 30.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $380 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $380 million in general obligation bonds to provide financial assistance to school districts for constructing and improving elementary and secondary school facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 646, "fingerprint": "1964|CA624|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA624|Statewide", "content_hash": "115b8f047c56f64e", "measure_id": "CA624", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Constitutional Amendments. Naming Corporations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.09999847, "percent_no": 30.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed the California Constitution to be amended to permit corp...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed the California Constitution to be amended to permit corporations to be named after individuals, removing previous restrictions on corporate naming conventions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 645, "fingerprint": "1964|CA623|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA623|Statewide", "content_hash": "d7c2a737a4cb9f96", "measure_id": "CA623", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Veterans' Tax Exemption: Residency Requirement", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.5, "percent_no": 31.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established or modified residency requirements for veterans to q...", "summary_text": "This measure established or modified residency requirements for veterans to qualify for property tax exemptions in California. It passed with 68.5% voter approval in 1964.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 644, "fingerprint": "1964|CA622|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA622|Statewide", "content_hash": "6a3cb50098262669", "measure_id": "CA622", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Television Programs", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.40000153, "percent_no": 33.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Telecom & Info Technology\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 643, "fingerprint": "1964|CA621|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA621|Statewide", "content_hash": "c6bc14d71f383a73", "measure_id": "CA621", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Property Taxation: Relief in Event of Disaster", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.90000153, "percent_no": 34.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure provided property tax relief for properties damaged or destroyed...", "summary_text": "This measure provided property tax relief for properties damaged or destroyed by disasters such as fires, floods, or earthquakes. It allowed for reassessment of property values following disaster damage to reduce the tax burden on affected property owners.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 642, "fingerprint": "1964|CA620|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA620|Statewide", "content_hash": "46ba164d4e230dd3", "measure_id": "CA620", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Sales and Rentals of Residential Real Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.40000153, "percent_no": 34.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure prohibited the state from denying, limiting, or abridging the ri...", "summary_text": "This measure prohibited the state from denying, limiting, or abridging the right of any person to decline to sell, lease, or rent residential real property to anyone for any reason. It effectively repealed California's fair housing law that had banned racial discrimination in housing sales and rentals.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 641, "fingerprint": "1964|CA619|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA619|Statewide", "content_hash": "2a66611d8b8799dd", "measure_id": "CA619", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "The State Beach, Park, Recreational, and Historical Facilities Bond Act of 1964", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.40000153, "percent_no": 37.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1964 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fi...", "summary_text": "This 1964 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the acquisition, development, and improvement of beaches, parks, recreational areas, and historical facilities. The measure provided funding for expanding and enhancing the state's public recreation and historical preservation infrastructure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 640, "fingerprint": "1964|CA618|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA618|Statewide", "content_hash": "987667fc1c28ef28", "measure_id": "CA618", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Railroad Train Crews", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.0, "percent_no": 39.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 639, "fingerprint": "1964|CA617|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA617|Statewide", "content_hash": "7a85ad5e0e6038ed", "measure_id": "CA617", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Superior Court Judges: Election in Counties Over 700,000 Population", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.79999924, "percent_no": 41.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established that superior court judges in California counties wi...", "summary_text": "This measure established that superior court judges in California counties with populations over 700,000 would be elected rather than appointed. It applied the electoral system for selecting superior court judges to the state's most populous counties.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 638, "fingerprint": "1964|CA616|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA616|Statewide", "content_hash": "efefe5b5bda16d9e", "measure_id": "CA616", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Veterans' Tax Exemption for Widows", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.09999847, "percent_no": 42.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended property tax exemptions for veterans to their surviving...", "summary_text": "This measure extended property tax exemptions for veterans to their surviving spouses. The exemption would continue for widows and widowers of eligible veterans who had previously received the veterans' property tax benefit.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 637, "fingerprint": "1964|CA615|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA615|Statewide", "content_hash": "6a407748588304ed", "measure_id": "CA615", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "State School Fund", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.0, "percent_no": 49.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: PreK-12 | Federal Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 636, "fingerprint": "1964|CA614|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA614|Statewide", "content_hash": "b2b038236ce7744d", "measure_id": "CA614", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Public Retirement Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.0, "percent_no": 58.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 635, "fingerprint": "1964|CA613|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1964|CA613|Statewide", "content_hash": "f2cf4804164bd32e", "measure_id": "CA613", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1964, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Lottery", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.89999962, "percent_no": 69.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Gambling & Lotteries\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1964)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201964", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201964", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 634, "fingerprint": "1962|CA612|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA612|Statewide", "content_hash": "b5926450aaf167e0", "measure_id": "CA612", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Constitution: Eliminates Obsolete and Superseded Provisions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.34999847, "percent_no": 50.65000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure eliminated outdated and superseded provisions from the Ca...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure eliminated outdated and superseded provisions from the California Constitution that were no longer applicable or had been replaced by newer constitutional language.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 633, "fingerprint": "1962|CA611|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA611|Statewide", "content_hash": "7157e891b3532ebb", "measure_id": "CA611", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6-P", "description": "Daylight Saving Time. Amendment to Daylight Saving Time Initiative Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 79.59999847, "percent_no": 20.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended California's Daylight Saving Time Initiative Act, modify...", "summary_text": "This measure amended California's Daylight Saving Time Initiative Act, modifying the state's existing daylight saving time regulations. The amendment passed with nearly 80% voter approval, changing how California observed daylight saving time.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 632, "fingerprint": "1962|CA610|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA610|Statewide", "content_hash": "def37c623e0fc1de", "measure_id": "CA610", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "College Exemption: Extension of", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.19999695, "percent_no": 27.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure extended the existing property tax exemption for college and uni...", "summary_text": "This measure extended the existing property tax exemption for college and university properties in California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 631, "fingerprint": "1962|CA609|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA609|Statewide", "content_hash": "25878bdc44229e52", "measure_id": "CA609", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Constitution Revision", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.19999695, "percent_no": 27.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 630, "fingerprint": "1962|CA608|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA608|Statewide", "content_hash": "5ab33459fd73c5bb", "measure_id": "CA608", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6-G", "description": "State Indebtedness", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.0, "percent_no": 33.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 629, "fingerprint": "1962|CA607|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA607|Statewide", "content_hash": "b3e39986bc4fe73c", "measure_id": "CA607", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1a", "description": "Bonds to Provide State College, Junior College and University Facilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.40000153, "percent_no": 33.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the construction ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the construction and improvement of facilities for California's state colleges, junior colleges, and universities. The bonds would provide funding for campus infrastructure and buildings across the state's higher education system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1a", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1a_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201a%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201a%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 628, "fingerprint": "1962|CA606|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA606|Statewide", "content_hash": "893a61a764c7f734", "measure_id": "CA606", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Superior Court Judges: Election in Counties Over 5 Million Population", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.19999695, "percent_no": 33.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required superior court judges in counties with populations over...", "summary_text": "This measure required superior court judges in counties with populations over 5 million to be elected rather than appointed. At the time, this applied only to Los Angeles County.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 627, "fingerprint": "1962|CA605|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA605|Statewide", "content_hash": "fab1f826df61f583", "measure_id": "CA605", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "General Obligation Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.5, "percent_no": 35.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Budgets\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 626, "fingerprint": "1962|CA604|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA604|Statewide", "content_hash": "9354192d450c4a81", "measure_id": "CA604", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1-P", "description": "State School Building Aid Bond Law of 1962", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.90000153, "percent_no": 36.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue $750 million in general obligation...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue $750 million in general obligation bonds to provide financial assistance to local school districts for constructing and improving school buildings and facilities. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 625, "fingerprint": "1962|CA603|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA603|Statewide", "content_hash": "5b0ede59f550252f", "measure_id": "CA603", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Sale of Tidelands", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.40000153, "percent_no": 40.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 624, "fingerprint": "1962|CA602|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA602|Statewide", "content_hash": "488bc77cfec807a5", "measure_id": "CA602", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Boxing and Wrestling Contests", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.70000076, "percent_no": 41.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 623, "fingerprint": "1962|CA601|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA601|Statewide", "content_hash": "800c145f942a0de8", "measure_id": "CA601", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "County Tax Appeals Boards", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.29999924, "percent_no": 41.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 622, "fingerprint": "1962|CA600|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA600|Statewide", "content_hash": "e69bd5fbc940bf85", "measure_id": "CA600", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Compensation of Local Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.90000153, "percent_no": 46.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 621, "fingerprint": "1962|CA599|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA599|Statewide", "content_hash": "3e7e9556e1a82dc6", "measure_id": "CA599", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2-P", "description": "Veterans' Bond Act of 1962", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.29999924, "percent_no": 48.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 620, "fingerprint": "1962|CA598|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA598|Statewide", "content_hash": "3e83019546caf236", "measure_id": "CA598", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Aid to Widows of Veterans", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.29999924, "percent_no": 49.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 619, "fingerprint": "1962|CA597|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA597|Statewide", "content_hash": "fe8a2efe0207899e", "measure_id": "CA597", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4-G", "description": "Assessment of Agricultural Land", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.40000153, "percent_no": 52.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required agricultural land to be assessed for propert...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required agricultural land to be assessed for property tax purposes based on its value for agricultural use rather than its potential value for other uses such as residential or commercial development. The measure aimed to provide property tax relief to farmers and ranchers by preventing assessments based on the land's highest and best use potential.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 618, "fingerprint": "1962|CA596|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA596|Statewide", "content_hash": "6603af49788e1e41", "measure_id": "CA596", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5-P", "description": "State Park and Recreation Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.20000076, "percent_no": 52.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The State Park and Recreation Bond Act would have authorized the state to iss...", "summary_text": "The State Park and Recreation Bond Act would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund the acquisition, development, and improvement of state parks and recreational facilities. The measure would have provided funding for expanding California's state park system and enhancing existing recreational infrastructure.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 617, "fingerprint": "1962|CA595|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA595|Statewide", "content_hash": "f6eb56bdf8bf2d42", "measure_id": "CA595", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.70000076, "percent_no": 53.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have created an Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board t...", "summary_text": "This measure would have created an Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board to hear appeals from decisions made by the state's alcoholic beverage control department. The board would have provided an administrative review process for licensing and regulatory decisions affecting businesses in the alcoholic beverage industry.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 616, "fingerprint": "1962|CA594|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA594|Statewide", "content_hash": "075c7160d2ac501f", "measure_id": "CA594", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Senate Reapportionment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.59999847, "percent_no": 53.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 615, "fingerprint": "1962|CA593|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA593|Statewide", "content_hash": "c4622f9d58f399e3", "measure_id": "CA593", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3-G", "description": "Veterans' Tax Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.79999924, "percent_no": 54.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 614, "fingerprint": "1962|CA592|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA592|Statewide", "content_hash": "f020f08d0675eb69", "measure_id": "CA592", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5-G", "description": "Workmen's Compensation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.59999847, "percent_no": 54.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 613, "fingerprint": "1962|CA591|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA591|Statewide", "content_hash": "47668ecd01537b61", "measure_id": "CA591", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 24", "description": "Subversive Activities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.29999924, "percent_no": 59.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 24", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 612, "fingerprint": "1962|CA590|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA590|Statewide", "content_hash": "59b70b302a3f87b6", "measure_id": "CA590", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Pay of Legislators", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.59999847, "percent_no": 60.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 611, "fingerprint": "1962|CA589|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA589|Statewide", "content_hash": "094a907b3e06527b", "measure_id": "CA589", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "General Legislative Sessions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.20000076, "percent_no": 60.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 610, "fingerprint": "1962|CA588|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA588|Statewide", "content_hash": "4897863237406a29", "measure_id": "CA588", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3-P", "description": "State Construction Program Bond Act of 1962", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.29999924, "percent_no": 62.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund a ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund a construction program for public facilities and infrastructure projects. The measure failed with 37.3% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 609, "fingerprint": "1962|CA587|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA587|Statewide", "content_hash": "1a3e50525790fd2f", "measure_id": "CA587", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4-P", "description": "Bonds: Housing for the Aged and Physically Handicapped", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.59999847, "percent_no": 63.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance housin...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance housing construction for elderly and physically disabled residents. The bonds would have provided funding for affordable housing developments specifically targeted to serve these populations.", "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 608, "fingerprint": "1962|CA586|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA586|Statewide", "content_hash": "c5bbf6881ef79093", "measure_id": "CA586", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1-G", "description": "Compensation of Legislators", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.09999847, "percent_no": 65.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 607, "fingerprint": "1962|CA585|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA585|Statewide", "content_hash": "70884cac0a42123b", "measure_id": "CA585", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Assessments: Historical Landmark Area", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 33.29999924, "percent_no": 66.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed property assessments to be reduced for buildi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed property assessments to be reduced for buildings or areas designated as historical landmarks. The assessment reduction would have been based on the difference between the property's market value and its restricted value due to landmark preservation requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 606, "fingerprint": "1962|CA584|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA584|Statewide", "content_hash": "bc15dea92fd52139", "measure_id": "CA584", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Veterans' Tax Exemption in Housing Project", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 33.09999847, "percent_no": 66.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have provided property tax exemptions for veterans living ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have provided property tax exemptions for veterans living in housing projects. The ballot measure failed with only 33.1% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 605, "fingerprint": "1962|CA583|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA583|Statewide", "content_hash": "f9c0b7fd383795e8", "measure_id": "CA583", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2-G", "description": "Veterans Tax Exemption in Housing Project", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 33.09999847, "percent_no": 66.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have provided property tax exemptions for veterans living ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have provided property tax exemptions for veterans living in housing projects in California. The ballot measure failed with only 33.1% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 604, "fingerprint": "1962|CA582|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1962|CA582|Statewide", "content_hash": "abe9d654c8ba9d51", "measure_id": "CA582", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1962, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Welfare Exemption: Leased Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.29999924, "percent_no": 67.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to allow property...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to allow property tax exemptions for leased property used for religious, hospital, scientific, or charitable purposes, even when the lessee rather than the property owner operates the exempt activity. Under existing law at the time, welfare exemptions generally required the exempt organization to own the property it occupied.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1962)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201962", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201962", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 603, "fingerprint": "1960|CA581|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA581|Statewide", "content_hash": "6e2a8b5cb533ceab", "measure_id": "CA581", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Disabled Veterans' Tax Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 80.59999847, "percent_no": 19.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure provides property tax exemptions for disabled veterans in Califo...", "summary_text": "This measure provides property tax exemptions for disabled veterans in California. It passed in 1960 with 80.6% voter approval, establishing tax relief for veterans with service-connected disabilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 602, "fingerprint": "1960|CA580|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA580|Statewide", "content_hash": "88d69573098415d5", "measure_id": "CA580", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Constitution: Eliminates Obsolete and Superseded Provisions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 78.40000153, "percent_no": 21.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure removed outdated and superseded provisions from the California C...", "summary_text": "This measure removed outdated and superseded provisions from the California Constitution that were no longer applicable or had been replaced by newer constitutional language.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 601, "fingerprint": "1960|CA579|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA579|Statewide", "content_hash": "b417cc2465c59beb", "measure_id": "CA579", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Administration of Justice", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.40000153, "percent_no": 25.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 600, "fingerprint": "1960|CA578|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA578|Statewide", "content_hash": "90765891cf844483", "measure_id": "CA578", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Claims Against Chartered Cities and Counties", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.09999847, "percent_no": 25.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed the state legislature to authorize claims against charte...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed the state legislature to authorize claims against chartered cities and counties that were previously barred by statutory limitations. It expanded the circumstances under which legal claims could be brought against these local government entities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 599, "fingerprint": "1960|CA577|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA577|Statewide", "content_hash": "04eae5fda897f0ec", "measure_id": "CA577", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "School Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.80000305, "percent_no": 28.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 598, "fingerprint": "1960|CA576|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA576|Statewide", "content_hash": "090d9df9e4fab99c", "measure_id": "CA576", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "District Courts of Appeal: Appellate Jurisdiction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.5, "percent_no": 33.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure expanded the jurisdiction of California's District Courts of App...", "summary_text": "This measure expanded the jurisdiction of California's District Courts of Appeal to hear additional types of cases that were previously heard by other courts. The measure transferred certain appellate matters from the California Supreme Court and other judicial bodies to the intermediate appellate courts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 597, "fingerprint": "1960|CA575|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA575|Statewide", "content_hash": "0348fde3dda05d08", "measure_id": "CA575", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Veterans' Tax Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.09999847, "percent_no": 33.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 596, "fingerprint": "1960|CA574|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA574|Statewide", "content_hash": "e70a25e6b99e5f81", "measure_id": "CA574", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1-P", "description": "Veterans Farm and Home Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.90000153, "percent_no": 35.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1-P", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 595, "fingerprint": "1960|CA573|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA573|Statewide", "content_hash": "7755d915efb7a75e", "measure_id": "CA573", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Assessment of Golf Courses", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.09999847, "percent_no": 37.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 594, "fingerprint": "1960|CA572|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA572|Statewide", "content_hash": "db953a50a1f071f8", "measure_id": "CA572", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Terms of Office", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.70000076, "percent_no": 39.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 593, "fingerprint": "1960|CA571|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA571|Statewide", "content_hash": "8a426e825ec99784", "measure_id": "CA571", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Chiropractors", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.29999924, "percent_no": 43.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 592, "fingerprint": "1960|CA570|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA570|Statewide", "content_hash": "66f657368499858c", "measure_id": "CA570", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 303", "description": "State Indebtedness", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.59999847, "percent_no": 48.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "primary", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 303", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_303_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%20303%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%20303%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 591, "fingerprint": "1960|CA569|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA569|Statewide", "content_hash": "debb2866e66cd9aa", "measure_id": "CA569", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1-G", "description": "The California Water Resources Development Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.5, "percent_no": 48.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the constr...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the construction of water infrastructure projects, including dams, aqueducts, and other facilities as part of California's State Water Project. The bonds would fund a comprehensive water development system designed to transport water from Northern California to the Central Valley and Southern California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1-G", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 590, "fingerprint": "1960|CA568|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA568|Statewide", "content_hash": "31615408b49e6190", "measure_id": "CA568", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Eligibility to Vote", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.79999924, "percent_no": 55.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Criminal Justice | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 589, "fingerprint": "1960|CA567|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA567|Statewide", "content_hash": "7e7a14b2c3d9bae5", "measure_id": "CA567", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Terms of Assemblymen", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.40000153, "percent_no": 57.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 588, "fingerprint": "1960|CA566|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA566|Statewide", "content_hash": "0fe15525d7441b45", "measure_id": "CA566", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Compensation of Legislators", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.0, "percent_no": 58.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 587, "fingerprint": "1960|CA565|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA565|Statewide", "content_hash": "e619f420be3cc0cb", "measure_id": "CA565", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Street and Highway Funds: Use for Local Grade Crossing Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.79999924, "percent_no": 59.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed California street and highway funds to be use...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed California street and highway funds to be used for local grade crossing bonds, enabling local governments to finance railroad grade crossing improvements with state transportation revenues. The measure failed with 40.8% support in 1960.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 586, "fingerprint": "1960|CA564|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1960|CA564|Statewide", "content_hash": "a7b86bec5bc8d25a", "measure_id": "CA564", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1960, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Senate Reapportionment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.5, "percent_no": 64.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1960, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1960)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201960", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201960", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 585, "fingerprint": "1958|CA563|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA563|Statewide", "content_hash": "fc1e01c0027f4217", "measure_id": "CA563", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Government Functions: Wartime Disaster", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 78.30000305, "percent_no": 21.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state government to continue essential functions ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state government to continue essential functions and services during wartime or major disasters when normal governmental operations might be disrupted. It provided legal framework for maintaining continuity of government operations under emergency conditions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 584, "fingerprint": "1958|CA562|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA562|Statewide", "content_hash": "7cd45b53f1a47a77", "measure_id": "CA562", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "School Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.19999695, "percent_no": 25.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 583, "fingerprint": "1958|CA561|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA561|Statewide", "content_hash": "9c55325bedc51717", "measure_id": "CA561", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Veterans' Bond Act of 1958", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.90000153, "percent_no": 26.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 582, "fingerprint": "1958|CA560|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA560|Statewide", "content_hash": "f0d6a08a28928b14", "measure_id": "CA560", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "State Construction Program Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.70000076, "percent_no": 36.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construction of vari...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construction of various public facilities and infrastructure projects. The bonds would be repaid through future state revenues.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 581, "fingerprint": "1958|CA559|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA559|Statewide", "content_hash": "2c80ab34fecd9443", "measure_id": "CA559", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Harbor Development Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.5, "percent_no": 43.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Economic Development | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 580, "fingerprint": "1958|CA558|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA558|Statewide", "content_hash": "ea075b4c930fb047", "measure_id": "CA558", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Presidential Voting", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.90000153, "percent_no": 45.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 579, "fingerprint": "1958|CA557|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA557|Statewide", "content_hash": "ac6355902513c23d", "measure_id": "CA557", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "General Legislative Session", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.5, "percent_no": 49.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 578, "fingerprint": "1958|CA556|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA556|Statewide", "content_hash": "b1701320c8ca099b", "measure_id": "CA556", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Legislator as Notary", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.0, "percent_no": 55.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 577, "fingerprint": "1958|CA555|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA555|Statewide", "content_hash": "41b5f412414dbcf6", "measure_id": "CA555", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Boxing Matches", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.09999847, "percent_no": 55.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 576, "fingerprint": "1958|CA554|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA554|Statewide", "content_hash": "1052441b4e2069be", "measure_id": "CA554", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Local Street and Road Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.29999924, "percent_no": 58.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Local Government | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 575, "fingerprint": "1958|CA553|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA553|Statewide", "content_hash": "2e78cc87cbd9e90a", "measure_id": "CA553", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Employer-Employee Relations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.40000153, "percent_no": 59.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 574, "fingerprint": "1958|CA552|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA552|Statewide", "content_hash": "e2c0acdcd5172b6d", "measure_id": "CA552", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "State Indebtedness", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.29999924, "percent_no": 61.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Elections | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 573, "fingerprint": "1958|CA551|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA551|Statewide", "content_hash": "7403270a56271b6c", "measure_id": "CA551", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Superintendent of Public Instruction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.59999847, "percent_no": 62.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have allowed voters to directly elect the Californi...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have allowed voters to directly elect the California Superintendent of Public Instruction. The measure failed with 37.6% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 572, "fingerprint": "1958|CA550|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA550|Statewide", "content_hash": "a561059b08a968e5", "measure_id": "CA550", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Taxation of School Property of Religious and Other Nonprofit Organizations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.79999924, "percent_no": 67.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have allowed California to tax school property owne...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have allowed California to tax school property owned by religious and other nonprofit organizations, removing their current tax-exempt status for educational facilities. The measure failed with only 32.8% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 571, "fingerprint": "1958|CA549|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA549|Statewide", "content_hash": "48d0e1de1551129c", "measure_id": "CA549", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Eminent Domain: Airports and Schools", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.0, "percent_no": 69.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1958 California ballot measure would have restricted the government's ab...", "summary_text": "This 1958 California ballot measure would have restricted the government's ability to use eminent domain to acquire private property for airports and schools. The measure failed with only 31% of voters supporting the proposed limitations on eminent domain powers.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 570, "fingerprint": "1958|CA548|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA548|Statewide", "content_hash": "0fe15525d7441b45", "measure_id": "CA548", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Compensation of Legislators", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.0, "percent_no": 70.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 569, "fingerprint": "1958|CA547|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA547|Statewide", "content_hash": "fa3ce9476d5eff2c", "measure_id": "CA547", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Compensation of Local Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 29.39999962, "percent_no": 70.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 568, "fingerprint": "1958|CA546|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1958|CA546|Statewide", "content_hash": "a3185d56a2c7bffc", "measure_id": "CA546", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1958, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "State Sales, Use and Income Tax Rates", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 18.10000038, "percent_no": 81.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1958 California ballot measure would have eliminated state sales, use, a...", "summary_text": "This 1958 California ballot measure would have eliminated state sales, use, and income taxes. The measure failed with only 18.1% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1958)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201958", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201958", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 567, "fingerprint": "1956|CA545|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA545|Statewide", "content_hash": "7cd45b53f1a47a77", "measure_id": "CA545", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "School Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 82.30000305, "percent_no": 17.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 566, "fingerprint": "1956|CA544|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA544|Statewide", "content_hash": "a94517c0a344f0a4", "measure_id": "CA544", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Veterans' Bond Act of 1956", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 80.40000153, "percent_no": 19.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 565, "fingerprint": "1956|CA543|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA543|Statewide", "content_hash": "f0d6a08a28928b14", "measure_id": "CA543", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "State Construction Program Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 77.90000153, "percent_no": 22.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund a construction progr...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund a construction program for public facilities and infrastructure projects. The bonds would be repaid through future state revenues.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 564, "fingerprint": "1956|CA542|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA542|Statewide", "content_hash": "0685541176dcc9c3", "measure_id": "CA542", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "State Boundaries", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.30000305, "percent_no": 25.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 563, "fingerprint": "1956|CA541|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA541|Statewide", "content_hash": "d1869df0c5ba3479", "measure_id": "CA541", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Framing County Charters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.80000305, "percent_no": 26.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 562, "fingerprint": "1956|CA540|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA540|Statewide", "content_hash": "cd51dd9545b25fc5", "measure_id": "CA540", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Civil and Criminal Appeals", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.0, "percent_no": 28.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 561, "fingerprint": "1956|CA539|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA539|Statewide", "content_hash": "03613077a1fd4afc", "measure_id": "CA539", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Public Water Supplies: Mutual Water Companies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.0, "percent_no": 33.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed mutual water companies to be formed by property owners t...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed mutual water companies to be formed by property owners to provide water service to their properties, giving these companies certain rights and powers similar to other water utilities. It established a legal framework for property owners to collectively organize and operate their own water supply systems.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 560, "fingerprint": "1956|CA538|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA538|Statewide", "content_hash": "d631e40e444e2de0", "measure_id": "CA538", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Repealing Alien Land Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.80000305, "percent_no": 33.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 559, "fingerprint": "1956|CA537|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA537|Statewide", "content_hash": "16b064a6332b1989", "measure_id": "CA537", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Legislative Employees", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.29999924, "percent_no": 37.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 558, "fingerprint": "1956|CA536|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA536|Statewide", "content_hash": "6fced6416377caa3", "measure_id": "CA536", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Constitutional Provisions Relating to Judiciary", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.79999924, "percent_no": 38.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended California's constitution to modify provisions related t...", "summary_text": "This measure amended California's constitution to modify provisions related to the state's judicial system, including court structure, judicial appointments, and court procedures. The specific changes restructured how the judiciary operated within the state's governmental framework.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 557, "fingerprint": "1956|CA535|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA535|Statewide", "content_hash": "596b412888cfb2dd", "measure_id": "CA535", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Church Exemptions: Parking Lots", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.29999924, "percent_no": 44.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1956 California ballot measure exempted church-owned parking lots from c...", "summary_text": "This 1956 California ballot measure exempted church-owned parking lots from certain taxes or regulations. The measure passed with 55.3% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 556, "fingerprint": "1956|CA534|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA534|Statewide", "content_hash": "8353ff2cdac8ef25", "measure_id": "CA534", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "State Indebtedness", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.0, "percent_no": 49.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 555, "fingerprint": "1956|CA533|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA533|Statewide", "content_hash": "1826ecc46a805047", "measure_id": "CA533", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Alcoholic Beverage Establishments", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.59999847, "percent_no": 49.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed the sale of alcoholic beverages in establishments that a...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed the sale of alcoholic beverages in establishments that also sold gasoline, removing a previous prohibition on such combined businesses. It permitted gas stations and similar facilities to obtain licenses to sell beer, wine, and spirits alongside fuel sales.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 554, "fingerprint": "1956|CA532|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA532|Statewide", "content_hash": "28265c51684f005e", "measure_id": "CA532", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Legislative Budget Session", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.5, "percent_no": 49.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 553, "fingerprint": "1956|CA531|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA531|Statewide", "content_hash": "52d42f448f53b04c", "measure_id": "CA531", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "State Civil Service: Contract Architects and Engineers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.70000076, "percent_no": 57.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have allowed California state government to hire pr...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have allowed California state government to hire private architects and engineers on a contract basis rather than requiring all such work to be performed by civil service employees. The measure failed with 42.7% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 552, "fingerprint": "1956|CA530|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA530|Statewide", "content_hash": "8185f9cb92d7e1a4", "measure_id": "CA530", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "State Legislature", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.79999924, "percent_no": 61.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 551, "fingerprint": "1956|CA529|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA529|Statewide", "content_hash": "3111e85e8178daba", "measure_id": "CA529", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Borough Form of County Government", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.20000076, "percent_no": 61.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1956 California ballot measure would have allowed counties to adopt a bo...", "summary_text": "This 1956 California ballot measure would have allowed counties to adopt a borough form of government, creating a new structural option for county administration. The measure failed with 38.2% of voters supporting the change.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 550, "fingerprint": "1956|CA528|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA528|Statewide", "content_hash": "5e832c98df2038c4", "measure_id": "CA528", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Inferior Court Judges", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.39999962, "percent_no": 68.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 549, "fingerprint": "1956|CA527|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1956|CA527|Statewide", "content_hash": "6d43fd4cde90f6e3", "measure_id": "CA527", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1956, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Oil and Gas Conservation Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 23.39999962, "percent_no": 76.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1956)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201956", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201956", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 548, "fingerprint": "1954|CA526|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA526|Statewide", "content_hash": "7933aed0be1a1ea7", "measure_id": "CA526", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Taxation: Exemption for Disabled Veterans", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 89.69999695, "percent_no": 10.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure exempted disabled veterans from property taxes on their homes in...", "summary_text": "This measure exempted disabled veterans from property taxes on their homes in California. It provided property tax relief specifically for veterans with service-related disabilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 547, "fingerprint": "1954|CA525|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA525|Statewide", "content_hash": "7cd45b53f1a47a77", "measure_id": "CA525", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "School Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 80.09999847, "percent_no": 19.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 546, "fingerprint": "1954|CA524|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA524|Statewide", "content_hash": "a872aa60807eda22", "measure_id": "CA524", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Veterans' Bond Act of 1954", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 79.40000153, "percent_no": 20.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 545, "fingerprint": "1954|CA523|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA523|Statewide", "content_hash": "a5ad16d1e6d02baf", "measure_id": "CA523", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Church Exemptions: Property Under Construction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.40000153, "percent_no": 26.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure exempted church property under construction from taxation, exten...", "summary_text": "This measure exempted church property under construction from taxation, extending the existing property tax exemption for completed church buildings to include churches that are actively being built.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 544, "fingerprint": "1954|CA522|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA522|Statewide", "content_hash": "42f588df19423098", "measure_id": "CA522", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Welfare Exemption: Property Under Construction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.30000305, "percent_no": 26.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure expanded California's welfare exemption to include property that...", "summary_text": "This measure expanded California's welfare exemption to include property that is under construction and intended for use by organizations that would qualify for the welfare exemption once the construction is completed. The exemption would apply to such properties during the construction period rather than only after they become operational.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 543, "fingerprint": "1954|CA521|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA521|Statewide", "content_hash": "e78fc5db6e0477c4", "measure_id": "CA521", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Land Titles. Torrans Act.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.40000153, "percent_no": 27.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 542, "fingerprint": "1954|CA520|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA520|Statewide", "content_hash": "fe5869f6cadea2a8", "measure_id": "CA520", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Resident Noncitizens: Property Ownership", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.90000153, "percent_no": 28.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1954 California ballot measure allowed noncitizen residents who were leg...", "summary_text": "This 1954 California ballot measure allowed noncitizen residents who were legally in the United States to own real property in the state. The measure removed previous restrictions that had prohibited certain noncitizens from purchasing or owning land in California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 541, "fingerprint": "1954|CA519|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA519|Statewide", "content_hash": "720fd52d89703210", "measure_id": "CA519", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Taxation: Exemption of Vessels", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.59999847, "percent_no": 28.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 540, "fingerprint": "1954|CA518|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA518|Statewide", "content_hash": "081d647c880024a6", "measure_id": "CA518", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "College Exemption: Property Under Construction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.40000153, "percent_no": 28.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure exempted college property under construction from propert...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure exempted college property under construction from property taxation in California. It provided a tax exemption for educational institutions during the construction phase of building projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 539, "fingerprint": "1954|CA517|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA517|Statewide", "content_hash": "a1546776b79fb372", "measure_id": "CA517", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Water Rights of Government Agencies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.90000153, "percent_no": 30.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure granted government agencies the same water rights as private ent...", "summary_text": "This measure granted government agencies the same water rights as private entities when acquiring water for public purposes. It allowed public agencies to condemn and acquire water rights through eminent domain procedures similar to those used for other types of property.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 538, "fingerprint": "1954|CA516|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA516|Statewide", "content_hash": "f55528389d9d2b5d", "measure_id": "CA516", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Framing County Charters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.19999695, "percent_no": 31.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 537, "fingerprint": "1954|CA515|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA515|Statewide", "content_hash": "2c0db09a0badd15c", "measure_id": "CA515", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Alcoholic Beverage Control", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.30000305, "percent_no": 33.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 536, "fingerprint": "1954|CA514|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA514|Statewide", "content_hash": "9e74ea821b89082c", "measure_id": "CA514", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Pay of Legislators", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.29999924, "percent_no": 47.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 535, "fingerprint": "1954|CA513|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA513|Statewide", "content_hash": "611b2443abd93c89", "measure_id": "CA513", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Inferior Court Judges", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.79999924, "percent_no": 50.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 534, "fingerprint": "1954|CA512|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA512|Statewide", "content_hash": "01eb4d1d07be04ea", "measure_id": "CA512", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Voting Eligibility", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.59999847, "percent_no": 52.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 533, "fingerprint": "1954|CA511|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA511|Statewide", "content_hash": "727f858e7eb8f1ab", "measure_id": "CA511", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Aid to Needy Aged", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.40000153, "percent_no": 54.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 532, "fingerprint": "1954|CA510|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA510|Statewide", "content_hash": "d11c95ebc408c4a4", "measure_id": "CA510", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Vernon City Charter", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.29999924, "percent_no": 59.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 531, "fingerprint": "1954|CA509|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA509|Statewide", "content_hash": "915973cbc6ef106a", "measure_id": "CA509", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Tax Exemption of Commercial and Fishing Vessels", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.0, "percent_no": 60.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1954 California ballot measure would have provided tax exemptions for co...", "summary_text": "This 1954 California ballot measure would have provided tax exemptions for commercial and fishing vessels. The measure failed with 40% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 530, "fingerprint": "1954|CA508|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA508|Statewide", "content_hash": "eb819f81075021b3", "measure_id": "CA508", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Terms of State Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.20000076, "percent_no": 68.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 529, "fingerprint": "1954|CA507|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1954|CA507|Statewide", "content_hash": "f1a7fea556f1f22d", "measure_id": "CA507", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1954, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Street and Highway Funds. Vehicle Parking.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.10000038, "percent_no": 68.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed street and highway funds to be used for vehic...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed street and highway funds to be used for vehicle parking facilities. It failed with 31.1% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1954)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201954", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201954", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 528, "fingerprint": "1952|CA506|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA506|Statewide", "content_hash": "d9bd17da7e86e2f5", "measure_id": "CA506", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Veterans' Farm and Home Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 85.69999695, "percent_no": 14.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 527, "fingerprint": "1952|CA505|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA505|Statewide", "content_hash": "fd3e789e10df7390", "measure_id": "CA505", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Taxation: Insurance Companies and Banks", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 84.5, "percent_no": 15.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Business & Commerce | Insurance | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would allow California to tax insurance companies and banks in a...", "summary_text": "This measure would allow California to tax insurance companies and banks in a manner consistent with federal tax regulations, replacing the existing state tax structure for these financial institutions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 526, "fingerprint": "1952|CA504|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA504|Statewide", "content_hash": "ca1a11b9a847883f", "measure_id": "CA504", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Military Service by Public Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 82.40000153, "percent_no": 17.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure prohibited public officers and employees in California from bein...", "summary_text": "This measure prohibited public officers and employees in California from being required to perform military service while holding their positions, allowing them to remain in civilian roles during their terms of office.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 525, "fingerprint": "1952|CA503|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA503|Statewide", "content_hash": "783a91a992866f4c", "measure_id": "CA503", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Repealing Constitutional Restrictions on Chinese", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 77.30000305, "percent_no": 22.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure repealed constitutional provisions that prohibited people of Chi...", "summary_text": "This measure repealed constitutional provisions that prohibited people of Chinese ancestry from owning land in California and removed other discriminatory restrictions against Chinese residents. The amendment eliminated language from the state constitution that had barred Chinese individuals from certain property rights and civic participation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 524, "fingerprint": "1952|CA502|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA502|Statewide", "content_hash": "d906bb5e672ece0f", "measure_id": "CA502", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 24", "description": "School Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 76.59999847, "percent_no": 23.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 24", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 523, "fingerprint": "1952|CA501|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA501|Statewide", "content_hash": "c15985de74ec03fb", "measure_id": "CA501", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Borough Form of City Government", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 76.30000305, "percent_no": 23.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized California cities to adopt a borough form of g...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized California cities to adopt a borough form of government structure. The measure passed, allowing municipalities to organize under this alternative governmental framework.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 522, "fingerprint": "1952|CA500|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA500|Statewide", "content_hash": "6593a42d346402fb", "measure_id": "CA500", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Taxation: Church Buildings Under Construction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.80000305, "percent_no": 25.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would exempt church buildings under construction from pro...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would exempt church buildings under construction from property taxation during the construction period. It extends the existing property tax exemption for completed church buildings to cover the construction phase as well.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 521, "fingerprint": "1952|CA499|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA499|Statewide", "content_hash": "6d7f392e5140b821", "measure_id": "CA499", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Taxation: College Buildings Under Construction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.30000305, "percent_no": 25.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would exempt college and university buildings under construction...", "summary_text": "This measure would exempt college and university buildings under construction from property taxation during the construction period.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 520, "fingerprint": "1952|CA498|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA498|Statewide", "content_hash": "0ddf50642ebdb7dd", "measure_id": "CA498", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Elections: Ballot Designation of Party Affiliations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.80000305, "percent_no": 27.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure established requirements for candidates to have their pol...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure established requirements for candidates to have their political party affiliations designated on election ballots. It standardized how party membership would be displayed to voters when they cast their ballots.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 519, "fingerprint": "1952|CA497|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA497|Statewide", "content_hash": "a0a81df156504d31", "measure_id": "CA497", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Superior Judges: Vacancies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.19999695, "percent_no": 29.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 518, "fingerprint": "1952|CA496|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA496|Statewide", "content_hash": "1ec5ec52112948de", "measure_id": "CA496", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Oaths of Office", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.59999847, "percent_no": 30.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary | Legislatures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 517, "fingerprint": "1952|CA495|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA495|Statewide", "content_hash": "0f6a46b0c191d078", "measure_id": "CA495", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Subversive Persons and Group", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.09999847, "percent_no": 31.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 516, "fingerprint": "1952|CA494|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA494|Statewide", "content_hash": "bc8f0ab9a6cedfa4", "measure_id": "CA494", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Community Redevelopment Projects", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.90000153, "percent_no": 34.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Economic Development\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized local governments in California to establish communit...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized local governments in California to establish community redevelopment agencies with the power to acquire, clear, and redevelop blighted urban areas. It provided legal framework for municipalities to use eminent domain and issue bonds to finance redevelopment projects aimed at eliminating substandard housing and commercial areas.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 515, "fingerprint": "1952|CA493|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA493|Statewide", "content_hash": "ee96163e1f9d2898", "measure_id": "CA493", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Public School Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.40000153, "percent_no": 34.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 514, "fingerprint": "1952|CA492|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA492|Statewide", "content_hash": "a151e2984d16cc23", "measure_id": "CA492", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Payments to Needy Blind", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.70000076, "percent_no": 43.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 513, "fingerprint": "1952|CA491|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA491|Statewide", "content_hash": "8ba35b61e7d25191", "measure_id": "CA491", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "State Funds: Hospital Construction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.90000153, "percent_no": 49.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to provide funds for the con...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to provide funds for the construction and improvement of hospitals throughout California. The bonds would be repaid through the state's general fund over time.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 512, "fingerprint": "1952|CA490|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA490|Statewide", "content_hash": "a00898fb765164d5", "measure_id": "CA490", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Taxation: Welfare Exemption of Nonprofit School Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.79999924, "percent_no": 49.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure expanded property tax exemptions to include nonprofit school pro...", "summary_text": "This measure expanded property tax exemptions to include nonprofit school property, allowing qualifying educational institutions to avoid paying property taxes on their facilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 511, "fingerprint": "1952|CA489|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA489|Statewide", "content_hash": "874eff9640b70801", "measure_id": "CA489", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Elections: Prohibiting Cross-Filing", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.95999908, "percent_no": 50.04000092, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have prohibited cross-filing in California election...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have prohibited cross-filing in California elections, which was the practice that allowed candidates to file for and appear on the ballot of multiple political parties in the same election. The measure failed by the narrowest possible margin with exactly 50.0% voting yes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 510, "fingerprint": "1952|CA488|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA488|Statewide", "content_hash": "af3344e3b97ba8f0", "measure_id": "CA488", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Property Tax Statements", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.59999847, "percent_no": 51.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 509, "fingerprint": "1952|CA487|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA487|Statewide", "content_hash": "bcb2ed2a542a1323", "measure_id": "CA487", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Grand Juries", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.40000153, "percent_no": 51.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 508, "fingerprint": "1952|CA486|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA486|Statewide", "content_hash": "b867d7b385fa8467", "measure_id": "CA486", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Chiropractors", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.79999924, "percent_no": 54.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 507, "fingerprint": "1952|CA485|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA485|Statewide", "content_hash": "c5a246693f8e4a50", "measure_id": "CA485", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Description of Property for Assessment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.0, "percent_no": 55.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed how property is described for tax assessment ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed how property is described for tax assessment purposes in California, though the specific details of the proposed changes are not provided in the ballot text.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 506, "fingerprint": "1952|CA484|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA484|Statewide", "content_hash": "b67252bcba53679a", "measure_id": "CA484", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Payments to Aged Persons", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.59999847, "percent_no": 56.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 505, "fingerprint": "1952|CA483|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1952|CA483|Statewide", "content_hash": "30de81dfdcc2b6e8", "measure_id": "CA483", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1952, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Public Funds: Certain Expenditures Prohibited", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.90000153, "percent_no": 58.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited the state and local governments from spend...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited the state and local governments from spending public funds on certain activities, likely including some forms of public assistance or specific government programs. The measure failed to pass, receiving only 41.9% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1952)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201952", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201952", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 504, "fingerprint": "1950|CA482|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1950|CA482|Statewide", "content_hash": "d28687e72e39c819", "measure_id": "CA482", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1950, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Eligibility to Vote", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 85.19999695, "percent_no": 14.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1950)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201950", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201950", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 503, "fingerprint": "1950|CA481|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1950|CA481|Statewide", "content_hash": "b79be28ebbc7338c", "measure_id": "CA481", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1950, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Inferior Court Reorganization", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 80.69999695, "percent_no": 19.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1950)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201950", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201950", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 502, "fingerprint": "1950|CA480|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1950|CA480|Statewide", "content_hash": "07c58a395bee5a16", "measure_id": "CA480", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1950, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Land Titles. Torrans Act.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.90000153, "percent_no": 27.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1950)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201950", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201950", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 501, "fingerprint": "1950|CA479|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1950|CA479|Statewide", "content_hash": "5710457bac6fa0ad", "measure_id": "CA479", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1950, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Constitutional Amendments and Laws. Naming Persons to Office.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.59999847, "percent_no": 31.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1950 California ballot measure amended the state constitution to prohibi...", "summary_text": "This 1950 California ballot measure amended the state constitution to prohibit naming specific individuals to public offices through constitutional amendments or laws. The measure established that public positions must be filled through established appointment or election processes rather than being directly designated to particular persons in legislation.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1950)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201950", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201950", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 500, "fingerprint": "1950|CA478|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1950|CA478|Statewide", "content_hash": "9ca0a7d85470e1bf", "measure_id": "CA478", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1950, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "State Civil Service", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.29999924, "percent_no": 36.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1950)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201950", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201950", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 499, "fingerprint": "1950|CA477|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1950|CA477|Statewide", "content_hash": "8a426e825ec99784", "measure_id": "CA477", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1950, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Chiropractors", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.0, "percent_no": 43.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1950)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201950", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201950", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 498, "fingerprint": "1950|CA476|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1950|CA476|Statewide", "content_hash": "2721caec9ab22269", "measure_id": "CA476", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1950, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Public Housing Projects. Requiring Election to Establish", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.79999924, "percent_no": 49.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required local communities to hold elections before establishing...", "summary_text": "This measure required local communities to hold elections before establishing public housing projects, giving voters the ability to approve or reject such developments in their areas.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1950)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201950", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201950", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 497, "fingerprint": "1950|CA475|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1950|CA475|Statewide", "content_hash": "9ebb32089a18d5d3", "measure_id": "CA475", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1950, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Compensation of Local Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.29999924, "percent_no": 65.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1950)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201950", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201950", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 496, "fingerprint": "1950|CA474|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1950|CA474|Statewide", "content_hash": "61194d60eb5723b5", "measure_id": "CA474", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1950, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Legislators", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 26.0, "percent_no": 74.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1950)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201950", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201950", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 495, "fingerprint": "1950|CA473|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1950|CA473|Statewide", "content_hash": "90da30a3bf62e998", "measure_id": "CA473", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1950, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Legalizing and Licensing Gambling", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 22.79999924, "percent_no": 77.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have legalized and established a licensing system for gamb...", "summary_text": "This measure would have legalized and established a licensing system for gambling activities in California. The measure failed with only 22.8% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1950)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201950", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201950", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 494, "fingerprint": "1950|CA472|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1950|CA472|Statewide", "content_hash": "2c98289dc9be47b4", "measure_id": "CA472", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1950, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Personal Property Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 19.29999924, "percent_no": 80.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1950, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1950)", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201950", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201950", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 493, "fingerprint": "1949|CA471|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA471|Statewide", "content_hash": "96868cf60a23aae1", "measure_id": "CA471", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "School Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.80000305, "percent_no": 27.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 492, "fingerprint": "1949|CA470|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA470|Statewide", "content_hash": "c48fd9e093c899d1", "measure_id": "CA470", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Constitutional Provisions for Adoption of 1879 Constitution", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.09999847, "percent_no": 27.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure dealt with constitutional provisions related to Californi...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure dealt with constitutional provisions related to California's 1879 Constitution. Given the limited information available, it appears to have addressed procedural or technical aspects of the state's constitutional framework that was established in 1879.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 491, "fingerprint": "1949|CA469|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA469|Statewide", "content_hash": "d9008a0ee8709965", "measure_id": "CA469", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Constitutional Provision Relating to State Fiscal Affairs", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.09999847, "percent_no": 27.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This constitutional provision established fiscal requirements and procedures ...", "summary_text": "This constitutional provision established fiscal requirements and procedures for California state government financial operations. It passed with 72.1% voter approval in 1949.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 490, "fingerprint": "1949|CA468|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA468|Statewide", "content_hash": "abffcda7d5c41163", "measure_id": "CA468", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Effective Date of 1933 Statutes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.69999695, "percent_no": 28.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would make statutes passed by the California Legislature in 1933...", "summary_text": "This measure would make statutes passed by the California Legislature in 1933 take effect immediately upon the measure's passage, rather than having their effective date determined by existing statutory timelines.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 489, "fingerprint": "1949|CA467|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA467|Statewide", "content_hash": "1400b4d3b153e0ea", "measure_id": "CA467", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Revision of Tax Provisions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.59999847, "percent_no": 28.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 488, "fingerprint": "1949|CA466|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA466|Statewide", "content_hash": "6907a871f06c8fa2", "measure_id": "CA466", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Repeal of Suspension Provision", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.69999695, "percent_no": 29.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Civil & Constitutional Law | Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 487, "fingerprint": "1949|CA465|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA465|Statewide", "content_hash": "9a453165335ff0c6", "measure_id": "CA465", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Constitutional Convention of 1878-1879", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.5, "percent_no": 29.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure addressed or modified provisions in California's constitution th...", "summary_text": "This measure addressed or modified provisions in California's constitution that were established during the Constitutional Convention of 1878-1879. The measure passed with 70.5% voter approval, though the specific changes made to the 1878-1879 constitutional provisions are not detailed in the provided information.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 486, "fingerprint": "1949|CA464|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA464|Statewide", "content_hash": "b508fef4bf18c7f3", "measure_id": "CA464", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Constitutional Provisions Relating to Local Government", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.5, "percent_no": 33.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1949 California ballot measure amended the state constitution to establi...", "summary_text": "This 1949 California ballot measure amended the state constitution to establish or modify provisions governing local government structures and operations. The measure restructured the legal framework for how cities, counties, and other local governmental entities function within the state.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 485, "fingerprint": "1949|CA463|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA463|Statewide", "content_hash": "3f0a74ce2c4587e8", "measure_id": "CA463", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Aged and Blind Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.5, "percent_no": 42.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 484, "fingerprint": "1949|CA462|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA462|Statewide", "content_hash": "5a2cb38428af7f55", "measure_id": "CA462", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Legislative Sessions and Legislative Pay", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.09999847, "percent_no": 42.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established that the California Legislature would meet in regula...", "summary_text": "This measure established that the California Legislature would meet in regular session every two years beginning in January of odd-numbered years, and set legislative compensation at $3,600 per two-year term plus $10 per day for actual attendance during sessions.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 483, "fingerprint": "1949|CA461|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA461|Statewide", "content_hash": "eef433b4649027bf", "measure_id": "CA461", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Daylight Saving Time", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.0, "percent_no": 45.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 482, "fingerprint": "1949|CA460|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1949|CA460|Statewide", "content_hash": "73ec3ad97735de8a", "measure_id": "CA460", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1949, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Constitutional Provisions Regarding State Officers, Legislators and Judges", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.79999924, "percent_no": 72.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary | Legislatures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1949 California ballot measure would have amended the state constitution...", "summary_text": "This 1949 California ballot measure would have amended the state constitution regarding the powers, duties, or qualifications of state officers, legislators, and judges. The measure failed with only 27.8% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201949", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1949)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201949", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 481, "fingerprint": "1948|CA459|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA459|Statewide", "content_hash": "89bb8e561f62cee8", "measure_id": "CA459", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Superior Judges, Vacancies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 480, "fingerprint": "1948|CA458|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA458|Statewide", "content_hash": "5f88c8698bec5d39", "measure_id": "CA458", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Succession to Governorship", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 479, "fingerprint": "1948|CA457|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA457|Statewide", "content_hash": "cb27a172d5d8fa0e", "measure_id": "CA457", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Fish and Game Commission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 478, "fingerprint": "1948|CA456|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA456|Statewide", "content_hash": "1ea8d731c0ee1cfe", "measure_id": "CA456", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Residence of Voters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 477, "fingerprint": "1948|CA455|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA455|Statewide", "content_hash": "1539e525fc17a05c", "measure_id": "CA455", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Initiatives", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 476, "fingerprint": "1948|CA454|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA454|Statewide", "content_hash": "690dbfed95cafcc3", "measure_id": "CA454", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Chiropractors", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 475, "fingerprint": "1948|CA453|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA453|Statewide", "content_hash": "7877c17d61221d97", "measure_id": "CA453", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Railroad Brakemen", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 80.0, "percent_no": 20.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 474, "fingerprint": "1948|CA452|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA452|Statewide", "content_hash": "6ad53c532abf0fe5", "measure_id": "CA452", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Aged and Blind Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 77.5, "percent_no": 22.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 473, "fingerprint": "1948|CA451|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA451|Statewide", "content_hash": "dde75c2399715f83", "measure_id": "CA451", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Veterans' Tax Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.5, "percent_no": 25.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 472, "fingerprint": "1948|CA450|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA450|Statewide", "content_hash": "da557a2b36014a11", "measure_id": "CA450", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "State Payment of Tax Exemption Losses", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.69999695, "percent_no": 31.30000305, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | State Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required the state government to compensate local gov...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required the state government to compensate local governments for property tax revenue lost due to state-granted tax exemptions. The measure failed despite receiving 68.7% support because it required a two-thirds majority to pass.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 471, "fingerprint": "1948|CA449|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA449|Statewide", "content_hash": "0fe15525d7441b45", "measure_id": "CA449", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Compensation of Legislators", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.19999695, "percent_no": 32.80000305, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 470, "fingerprint": "1948|CA448|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA448|Statewide", "content_hash": "5af87a841c1851cb", "measure_id": "CA448", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Municipal Charters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.59999847, "percent_no": 33.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 469, "fingerprint": "1948|CA447|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA447|Statewide", "content_hash": "2e22dc221eca846b", "measure_id": "CA447", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "State Civil Service Exemptions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.0, "percent_no": 49.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 468, "fingerprint": "1948|CA446|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA446|Statewide", "content_hash": "be61d8cb7633edbd", "measure_id": "CA446", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Senate Reapportionment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.0, "percent_no": 49.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 467, "fingerprint": "1948|CA445|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA445|Statewide", "content_hash": "db8ee3997baa76e9", "measure_id": "CA445", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Regulation of Commercial Fishing", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.20000076, "percent_no": 50.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Business & Commerce | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have regulated commercial fishing operations in Cal...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have regulated commercial fishing operations in California waters. The measure failed with 49.2% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 466, "fingerprint": "1948|CA444|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA444|Statewide", "content_hash": "1d9dfd83f06f9e06", "measure_id": "CA444", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Local Control of Intoxicating Liquors", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.90000153, "percent_no": 55.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed local governments in California to impose str...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed local governments in California to impose stricter regulations on the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages than those established by state law. It would have given cities and counties greater authority to control liquor licensing and operations within their jurisdictions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 465, "fingerprint": "1948|CA443|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA443|Statewide", "content_hash": "569f4770aa10e5e8", "measure_id": "CA443", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Local Control and Enforcement of Intoxicating Liquors", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.59999847, "percent_no": 57.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed local governments to have greater control ove...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed local governments to have greater control over the regulation and enforcement of alcohol sales and distribution within their jurisdictions. It would have given cities and counties more authority to set their own rules regarding intoxicating liquors beyond state-level regulations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 464, "fingerprint": "1948|CA442|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA442|Statewide", "content_hash": "f0bd12825d1d8ced", "measure_id": "CA442", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Housing", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.79999924, "percent_no": 63.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 463, "fingerprint": "1948|CA441|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1948|CA441|Statewide", "content_hash": "27a91e59b2a0bdf7", "measure_id": "CA441", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1948, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Fish Nets", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.89999962, "percent_no": 68.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Business & Commerce | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201948", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1948)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201948", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 462, "fingerprint": "1946|CA440|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA440|Statewide", "content_hash": "5799af8798dc77e3", "measure_id": "CA440", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Disability of the Governor to Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 80.90000153, "percent_no": 19.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established procedures for determining when the Governor is unab...", "summary_text": "This measure established procedures for determining when the Governor is unable to perform the duties of office and how governmental authority would be transferred during such periods of disability.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 461, "fingerprint": "1946|CA439|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA439|Statewide", "content_hash": "44a18b7a2b33765a", "measure_id": "CA439", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Veterans' Bond Act of 1946", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 79.59999847, "percent_no": 20.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 460, "fingerprint": "1946|CA438|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA438|Statewide", "content_hash": "64616e681cda534e", "measure_id": "CA438", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Public Schools", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.40000153, "percent_no": 25.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 459, "fingerprint": "1946|CA437|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA437|Statewide", "content_hash": "64fe7b205a55a2b3", "measure_id": "CA437", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Repeal of Educational Poll Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.0, "percent_no": 29.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 458, "fingerprint": "1946|CA436|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA436|Statewide", "content_hash": "2fc5490dd67bd36b", "measure_id": "CA436", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "County Boards of Education", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.0, "percent_no": 29.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 457, "fingerprint": "1946|CA435|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA435|Statewide", "content_hash": "91a0157eb4e22e4b", "measure_id": "CA435", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Annual Sessions of the Legislature", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.80000305, "percent_no": 34.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the California Legislature from meeting every other year...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the California Legislature from meeting every other year to holding annual sessions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 456, "fingerprint": "1946|CA434|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA434|Statewide", "content_hash": "016f12e192bff1df", "measure_id": "CA434", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "County Superintendents of Schools", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.09999847, "percent_no": 38.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required County Superintendents of Schools in California to be e...", "summary_text": "This measure required County Superintendents of Schools in California to be elected by voters rather than appointed. It changed the method of selection for these educational administrative positions from appointment to direct election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 455, "fingerprint": "1946|CA433|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA433|Statewide", "content_hash": "cb70fb84587c0fb2", "measure_id": "CA433", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Salary of the Governor", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.59999847, "percent_no": 39.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 454, "fingerprint": "1946|CA432|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA432|Statewide", "content_hash": "083179b962302589", "measure_id": "CA432", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Public Utilities Commission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.70000076, "percent_no": 40.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 453, "fingerprint": "1946|CA431|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA431|Statewide", "content_hash": "368632c30736159d", "measure_id": "CA431", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Amendment of Laws Adopted by Initiative", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.90000153, "percent_no": 43.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended California's initiative process to allow the state legis...", "summary_text": "This measure amended California's initiative process to allow the state legislature to amend or repeal laws that were originally adopted by voter initiative, whereas previously such laws could only be changed by another voter initiative.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 452, "fingerprint": "1946|CA430|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA430|Statewide", "content_hash": "45516dcb106158d8", "measure_id": "CA430", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Business Loans for Veterans", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.0, "percent_no": 49.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 451, "fingerprint": "1946|CA429|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA429|Statewide", "content_hash": "148a901ba0ac1c24", "measure_id": "CA429", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "State Superintendents of Public Instruction", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.09999847, "percent_no": 49.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This California ballot measure from 1946 would change how the State Superinte...", "summary_text": "This California ballot measure from 1946 would change how the State Superintendent of Public Instruction is selected or appointed, though the specific details of the new system are not provided in the given ballot text. The measure passed with 50.1% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 450, "fingerprint": "1946|CA428|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA428|Statewide", "content_hash": "0aa4feeef0d7b4f4", "measure_id": "CA428", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Validation of Legislative Amendments to Alien Land Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.09999847, "percent_no": 58.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have validated legislative amendments to California's Alie...", "summary_text": "This measure would have validated legislative amendments to California's Alien Land Law, which restricted property ownership rights for certain non-citizens. The measure sought to confirm changes made by the state legislature to these existing land ownership restrictions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 449, "fingerprint": "1946|CA427|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA427|Statewide", "content_hash": "afdd34dbad0ecdea", "measure_id": "CA427", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Allocation of Public School Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.40000153, "percent_no": 60.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1946 California ballot measure would have changed how public school fund...", "summary_text": "This 1946 California ballot measure would have changed how public school funds were allocated throughout the state. The measure failed, receiving 39.4% support from voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 448, "fingerprint": "1946|CA426|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA426|Statewide", "content_hash": "28ec7f4eb2bd4302", "measure_id": "CA426", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Fair Employment Practices Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 28.70000076, "percent_no": 71.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 447, "fingerprint": "1946|CA425|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA425|Statewide", "content_hash": "ce181996cea0bfd7", "measure_id": "CA425", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Creation of Court for Tax Appeals", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 28.70000076, "percent_no": 71.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would create a specialized Court for Tax Appeals in California t...", "summary_text": "This measure would create a specialized Court for Tax Appeals in California to handle tax-related legal disputes. The court would provide a dedicated judicial forum for resolving disagreements between taxpayers and tax authorities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 446, "fingerprint": "1946|CA424|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1946|CA424|Statewide", "content_hash": "20d2f594ca684f8e", "measure_id": "CA424", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1946, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Greyhound Racing", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 23.0, "percent_no": 77.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Gambling & Lotteries | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201946", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1946)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201946", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 445, "fingerprint": "1944|CA423|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA423|Statewide", "content_hash": "30cade475eff4b95", "measure_id": "CA423", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "The Veterans Bond Act of 1943", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 87.69999695, "percent_no": 12.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 444, "fingerprint": "1944|CA422|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA422|Statewide", "content_hash": "31a03e10040cd22a", "measure_id": "CA422", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Public Officers and Employees. Reinstatement After Military Service", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 85.69999695, "percent_no": 14.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Military & Veterans Affairs | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required that public officers and employees who left their posit...", "summary_text": "This measure required that public officers and employees who left their positions to serve in the military during wartime be reinstated to their former positions upon their return from service. It established legal protections ensuring that government workers would not lose their civilian employment due to military service obligations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 443, "fingerprint": "1944|CA421|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA421|Statewide", "content_hash": "fc0926c8aee0d266", "measure_id": "CA421", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Taxation. Veterans Exemption.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 80.09999847, "percent_no": 19.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 442, "fingerprint": "1944|CA420|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA420|Statewide", "content_hash": "7ca66e56bd5aac02", "measure_id": "CA420", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Taxation of Federal Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.59999847, "percent_no": 31.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 441, "fingerprint": "1944|CA419|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA419|Statewide", "content_hash": "99ccfdb40c18c2b0", "measure_id": "CA419", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Funds for Elementary Schools", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.0, "percent_no": 36.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 440, "fingerprint": "1944|CA418|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA418|Statewide", "content_hash": "6f9ce5e2d52aeb44", "measure_id": "CA418", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Taxation Exemption of Religious, Hospital, and Charitable Organizations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.5, "percent_no": 45.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would exempt religious, hospital, and charitable organizations f...", "summary_text": "This measure would exempt religious, hospital, and charitable organizations from certain taxes in California. The ballot measure passed with 54.5% voter approval in 1944.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 439, "fingerprint": "1944|CA417|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA417|Statewide", "content_hash": "da74325d71f030db", "measure_id": "CA417", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Legislature. Expenses of Members.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.29999924, "percent_no": 45.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed California legislators to receive reimbursement for expe...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed California legislators to receive reimbursement for expenses incurred while performing their official duties. The ballot authorized the state to cover costs such as travel and other necessary expenses for members of the Legislature.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 438, "fingerprint": "1944|CA416|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA416|Statewide", "content_hash": "db8acafec904d02d", "measure_id": "CA416", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Constitutional Officers. Compensation.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.5, "percent_no": 47.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure addressed the compensation of California's constitutional office...", "summary_text": "This measure addressed the compensation of California's constitutional officers, though the specific details of the changes are not provided in the ballot text. It passed with 52.5% of the vote in 1944.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 437, "fingerprint": "1944|CA415|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA415|Statewide", "content_hash": "bf10f5adbf6fd163", "measure_id": "CA415", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Compensation of Officers, Increase During Term", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.0, "percent_no": 48.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure allowed increases in compensation for certain elected off...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure allowed increases in compensation for certain elected officers during their current term of office, overturning a previous constitutional prohibition against mid-term salary increases. The measure passed with 52% of the vote in 1944.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 436, "fingerprint": "1944|CA414|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA414|Statewide", "content_hash": "d03bc0535a23441c", "measure_id": "CA414", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Right of Employment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.79999924, "percent_no": 59.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 435, "fingerprint": "1944|CA413|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA413|Statewide", "content_hash": "bdb92c9628f601bf", "measure_id": "CA413", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Legislature. Sessions. Budget.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.90000153, "percent_no": 60.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 434, "fingerprint": "1944|CA412|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA412|Statewide", "content_hash": "b9d401a7bc9e5a8c", "measure_id": "CA412", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Retirement Payments. Gross Income Tax.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.79999924, "percent_no": 67.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1944 California ballot measure would have established a system of retire...", "summary_text": "This 1944 California ballot measure would have established a system of retirement payments funded by a gross income tax. The measure failed with only 32.8% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 433, "fingerprint": "1944|CA411|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1944|CA411|Statewide", "content_hash": "7f810bf1b6280095", "measure_id": "CA411", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1944, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Validating Tax Deeds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.59999847, "percent_no": 67.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201944", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1944)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201944", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 432, "fingerprint": "1942|CA410|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA410|Statewide", "content_hash": "beffd6317706e173", "measure_id": "CA410", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Fish and Game Funds Restricted", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.40000153, "percent_no": 26.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 431, "fingerprint": "1942|CA409|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA409|Statewide", "content_hash": "02ed52dcffc2c100", "measure_id": "CA409", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Reapportionment Commission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.90000153, "percent_no": 28.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 430, "fingerprint": "1942|CA408|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA408|Statewide", "content_hash": "b421a63bf8da66ac", "measure_id": "CA408", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Boxing and Wrestling Matches Regulated", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.40000153, "percent_no": 29.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure regulated boxing and wrestling matches in California", "summary_text": "This ballot measure regulated boxing and wrestling matches in California. It established state oversight and regulatory standards for these sporting events.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 429, "fingerprint": "1942|CA407|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA407|Statewide", "content_hash": "ee22d42f05be1ad7", "measure_id": "CA407", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Taxation of Insurance Companies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.69999695, "percent_no": 30.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would authorize the California legislature to tax insurance comp...", "summary_text": "This measure would authorize the California legislature to tax insurance companies doing business in the state. It would allow the state to impose taxes on insurance company premiums, income, or other aspects of their operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 428, "fingerprint": "1942|CA406|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA406|Statewide", "content_hash": "7a77ef183e6b2ffe", "measure_id": "CA406", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "State Treasurer Trustee of Certain State Moneys", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.80000305, "percent_no": 32.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure designated the State Treasurer as the trustee responsible for ma...", "summary_text": "This measure designated the State Treasurer as the trustee responsible for managing certain state funds and moneys. It established the Treasurer's fiduciary role over specified state financial assets.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 427, "fingerprint": "1942|CA405|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA405|Statewide", "content_hash": "5f76761ca7c17613", "measure_id": "CA405", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "School Districts, Fifth and Sixth Class Cities May Acquire Stock in Municipal Water Companies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.40000153, "percent_no": 43.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1942 California ballot measure authorized fifth and sixth class cities a...", "summary_text": "This 1942 California ballot measure authorized fifth and sixth class cities and school districts to acquire stock in municipal water companies. The measure passed with 56.4% voter approval, expanding the types of public entities that could hold ownership stakes in municipal water utilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 426, "fingerprint": "1942|CA404|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA404|Statewide", "content_hash": "822db661c90ec3c6", "measure_id": "CA404", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Prohibiting \"Hot Cargo,\" \"Secondary Boycott\"", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.29999924, "percent_no": 44.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1942 California ballot measure prohibited \"hot cargo\" agreements where u...", "summary_text": "This 1942 California ballot measure prohibited \"hot cargo\" agreements where unions refuse to handle goods from non-union companies and \"secondary boycotts\" where unions pressure neutral third parties to stop doing business with targeted employers. The measure restricted certain union organizing and pressure tactics by making these specific types of boycotts illegal.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 425, "fingerprint": "1942|CA403|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA403|Statewide", "content_hash": "b66247bff7ec947a", "measure_id": "CA403", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Board of Forestry Established", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.20000076, "percent_no": 50.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 424, "fingerprint": "1942|CA402|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA402|Statewide", "content_hash": "9315891684326f80", "measure_id": "CA402", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Compensation of Specified State Officers May Be Changed During Term of Office", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.09999847, "percent_no": 53.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have allowed the compensation of specified state of...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have allowed the compensation of specified state officers to be changed during their current term of office. The measure failed with 46.1% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 423, "fingerprint": "1942|CA401|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA401|Statewide", "content_hash": "514b32eef0505375", "measure_id": "CA401", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Personal Income Tax Laws", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.70000076, "percent_no": 54.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 422, "fingerprint": "1942|CA400|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA400|Statewide", "content_hash": "9be7970edfb061b8", "measure_id": "CA400", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Boards of Equalization", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.90000153, "percent_no": 55.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 421, "fingerprint": "1942|CA399|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA399|Statewide", "content_hash": "eb8c032d9f066ef0", "measure_id": "CA399", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Annual Legislative Sessions and Budgets", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.59999847, "percent_no": 57.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required the California Legislature to meet annually ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required the California Legislature to meet annually instead of biennially and to adopt state budgets on an annual basis. It failed with 42.6% of voters supporting the change from the existing biennial legislative session and budget cycle.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 420, "fingerprint": "1942|CA398|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA398|Statewide", "content_hash": "2842ad5f5e052443", "measure_id": "CA398", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Rates of Interest on Loans and Judgments", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.59999847, "percent_no": 62.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1942 California ballot measure would have regulated interest rates that ...", "summary_text": "This 1942 California ballot measure would have regulated interest rates that could be charged on loans and court judgments. The measure failed with 37.6% voter support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 419, "fingerprint": "1942|CA397|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA397|Statewide", "content_hash": "f79172718cdf931e", "measure_id": "CA397", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Compensation of Legislative Members Increased, Mileage Maximum Fixed", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.59999847, "percent_no": 64.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have increased compensation for California legislat...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have increased compensation for California legislative members and established a maximum limit on mileage reimbursements. The measure failed with 35.6% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 418, "fingerprint": "1942|CA396|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA396|Statewide", "content_hash": "7ec8c98d3c5999b5", "measure_id": "CA396", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Basic Science Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.0, "percent_no": 66.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 417, "fingerprint": "1942|CA395|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA395|Statewide", "content_hash": "fb6bd927e363167e", "measure_id": "CA395", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Reorganization of Building and Loan Associations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.20000076, "percent_no": 72.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1942 California ballot measure would have reorganized the structure and ...", "summary_text": "This 1942 California ballot measure would have reorganized the structure and operations of building and loan associations, which were financial institutions that provided home mortgages and accepted savings deposits. The measure failed with only 27.2% of voters supporting the proposed changes to these lending institutions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 416, "fingerprint": "1942|CA394|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA394|Statewide", "content_hash": "8dbefb2fee9e136d", "measure_id": "CA394", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Decisions by Administrative Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 22.70000076, "percent_no": 77.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed administrative officers to make certain decis...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed administrative officers to make certain decisions without requiring review or approval by other government bodies or officials. It would have expanded the independent decision-making authority of administrative personnel in California state government.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 415, "fingerprint": "1942|CA393|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1942|CA393|Statewide", "content_hash": "d23095e579bbe26e", "measure_id": "CA393", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1942, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Supreme and Appellate Court Procedure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 22.10000038, "percent_no": 77.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed procedures for California's Supreme Court and...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed procedures for California's Supreme Court and appellate courts, though the specific procedural modifications are not detailed in the provided ballot text.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201942", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1942)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201942", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 414, "fingerprint": "1940|CA392|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA392|Statewide", "content_hash": "e79b59cfe402a42a", "measure_id": "CA392", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Release of Encumbrances Given for Security for Old Age Aid", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.0, "percent_no": 36.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would release encumbrances (liens or claims) that had bee...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would release encumbrances (liens or claims) that had been placed on property as security for old age assistance payments received from the state. The measure aimed to remove these financial obligations that recipients or their estates had been required to provide in exchange for receiving old age aid.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 413, "fingerprint": "1940|CA391|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA391|Statewide", "content_hash": "6d0e61e55c42e5cf", "measure_id": "CA391", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Election Returns for Governor and Lieutenant Governor", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.0, "percent_no": 36.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure changed the procedure for reporting election returns for Governo...", "summary_text": "This measure changed the procedure for reporting election returns for Governor and Lieutenant Governor in California, though the specific details of the procedural changes are not specified in the available ballot text.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 412, "fingerprint": "1940|CA390|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA390|Statewide", "content_hash": "ef0f29aae26328f7", "measure_id": "CA390", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Fish and Game Commission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.59999847, "percent_no": 36.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 411, "fingerprint": "1940|CA389|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA389|Statewide", "content_hash": "c03ae54b263e2536", "measure_id": "CA389", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Proceedings for Public Improvements or Acquisition of Property for Public Use", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.59999847, "percent_no": 37.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established procedures for public agencies to acquire property f...", "summary_text": "This measure established procedures for public agencies to acquire property for public use and undertake public improvements projects. It passed in 1940 with 62.6% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 410, "fingerprint": "1940|CA388|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA388|Statewide", "content_hash": "470088117f4088f5", "measure_id": "CA388", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Releasing Obligations, Encumbrances and Agreements Taken as Security for State Aid to Aged Persons", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.09999847, "percent_no": 37.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure released obligations, encumbrances, and agreements that were tak...", "summary_text": "This measure released obligations, encumbrances, and agreements that were taken as security for state aid provided to aged persons. It eliminated the requirement for elderly recipients of state assistance to pledge property or assets as collateral for the aid they received.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 409, "fingerprint": "1940|CA387|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA387|Statewide", "content_hash": "cce4f34bffdaee65", "measure_id": "CA387", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Permitting State to Own Shares in Mutual Water Companies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.70000076, "percent_no": 41.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure permitted the State of California to own shares in mutual...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure permitted the State of California to own shares in mutual water companies. It removed existing legal restrictions that prevented state ownership of such shares in these member-owned water utilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 408, "fingerprint": "1940|CA386|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA386|Statewide", "content_hash": "fde327a8fc35b3dd", "measure_id": "CA386", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Legislative Committees", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.09999847, "percent_no": 47.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 407, "fingerprint": "1940|CA385|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA385|Statewide", "content_hash": "fe5d768fe05f328e", "measure_id": "CA385", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Institutions for Felons", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.09999847, "percent_no": 49.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 406, "fingerprint": "1940|CA384|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA384|Statewide", "content_hash": "fed7830890ad47d4", "measure_id": "CA384", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Court Review of Acts of Administrative Officers, Boards and Commissions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.59999847, "percent_no": 50.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required California courts to review the factual basi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required California courts to review the factual basis of decisions made by administrative officers, boards, and commissions, rather than limiting judicial review to procedural and legal questions. It would have expanded the scope of court oversight over administrative agency determinations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 405, "fingerprint": "1940|CA383|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA383|Statewide", "content_hash": "073471ab3715b644", "measure_id": "CA383", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Personal Liability Insurance for Officers, Agents and Employees of State and Political Subdivisions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.5, "percent_no": 58.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have allowed the state and local governments in Cal...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have allowed the state and local governments in California to purchase personal liability insurance for their officers, agents, and employees. The measure would have provided legal authority for public entities to use public funds to protect their workers from personal financial liability arising from their official duties.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 404, "fingerprint": "1940|CA382|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA382|Statewide", "content_hash": "ee8f3a7a14909c6a", "measure_id": "CA382", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Apportionment of Certain Monies to Political Subdivisions for Political Purposes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.59999847, "percent_no": 59.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Ethics/Lobbying/Campaign Finance | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allocated certain state monies to political subdivisi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allocated certain state monies to political subdivisions within California for political purposes. The ballot language does not specify the source of the funds or the exact nature of the political activities that would be supported.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 403, "fingerprint": "1940|CA381|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA381|Statewide", "content_hash": "cc15761b82452f7e", "measure_id": "CA381", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Appellate Courts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.09999847, "percent_no": 59.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 402, "fingerprint": "1940|CA380|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA380|Statewide", "content_hash": "65be055f065dec5c", "measure_id": "CA380", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Transfer of Funds by City Treasurer", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.90000153, "percent_no": 62.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed city treasurers in California to transfer fun...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed city treasurers in California to transfer funds between different city accounts or funds. The measure failed, receiving 37.9% support from voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 401, "fingerprint": "1940|CA379|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA379|Statewide", "content_hash": "72ab5fc05961c48b", "measure_id": "CA379", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Legislature, Budgets, Governor", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.5, "percent_no": 69.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Legislatures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 400, "fingerprint": "1940|CA378|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA378|Statewide", "content_hash": "9d6eef5f6d3c7c51", "measure_id": "CA378", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Daylight Savings", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.0, "percent_no": 70.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 399, "fingerprint": "1940|CA377|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA377|Statewide", "content_hash": "43d8a7f1e1f07911", "measure_id": "CA377", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Tax-Exempt Vessels", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 26.39999962, "percent_no": 73.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 398, "fingerprint": "1940|CA376|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1940|CA376|Statewide", "content_hash": "5f48013b846c0a97", "measure_id": "CA376", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1940, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Sale or Lease of State Park Lands Containing Oil or Gas Deposits", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 15.10000038, "percent_no": 84.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed the state to sell or lease California state p...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed the state to sell or lease California state park lands that contain oil or gas deposits for extraction purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1940, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201940", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1940)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201940", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 397, "fingerprint": "1939|CA375|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1939|CA375|Statewide", "content_hash": "35f26b1eb0517681", "measure_id": "CA375", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1939, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Personal Property Brokers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.59999847, "percent_no": 28.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201939", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1939)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201939", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 396, "fingerprint": "1939|CA374|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1939|CA374|Statewide", "content_hash": "86d778b27333affd", "measure_id": "CA374", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1939, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Personal Property Brokers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.09999847, "percent_no": 28.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201939", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1939)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201939", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 395, "fingerprint": "1939|CA373|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1939|CA373|Statewide", "content_hash": "be1422ee7aba3630", "measure_id": "CA373", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1939, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Oil and Gas Control", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.70000076, "percent_no": 61.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201939", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1939)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201939", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 394, "fingerprint": "1939|CA372|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1939|CA372|Statewide", "content_hash": "9c0907c7c12bd93e", "measure_id": "CA372", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1939, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Retirement Warrants", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 33.90000153, "percent_no": 66.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Human Services | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201939", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1939)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201939", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 393, "fingerprint": "1939|CA371|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1939|CA371|Statewide", "content_hash": "342fa1d2cf2b5abb", "measure_id": "CA371", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1939, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Chiropractors", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 29.70000076, "percent_no": 70.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201939", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1939)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201939", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 392, "fingerprint": "1938|CA370|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA370|Statewide", "content_hash": "1cd55a03051cf7c9", "measure_id": "CA370", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Removal of Judges Upon Conviction of Crime", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 83.69999695, "percent_no": 16.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established that judges in California would be automatically rem...", "summary_text": "This measure established that judges in California would be automatically removed from office upon conviction of a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude. It created a constitutional requirement for judicial removal based on criminal conviction rather than leaving such decisions to discretionary processes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 391, "fingerprint": "1938|CA369|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA369|Statewide", "content_hash": "39b15a3e82028b62", "measure_id": "CA369", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Taxation of Insurance Companies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.0, "percent_no": 30.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established a system for taxing insurance companies operating in...", "summary_text": "This measure established a system for taxing insurance companies operating in California based on their gross premiums received from policies written in the state. It replaced previous tax structures and created uniform taxation standards for insurance companies doing business in California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 390, "fingerprint": "1938|CA368|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA368|Statewide", "content_hash": "d3e4c0a74ac28be0", "measure_id": "CA368", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Motor Vehicle Taxation and Revenue", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.30000305, "percent_no": 33.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1938 California ballot measure addressed the taxation of motor vehicles ...", "summary_text": "This 1938 California ballot measure addressed the taxation of motor vehicles and the distribution of revenue generated from such taxes. The measure passed with 66.3% voter approval, establishing or modifying the state's framework for collecting and allocating motor vehicle tax revenue.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 389, "fingerprint": "1938|CA367|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA367|Statewide", "content_hash": "9096ddffe870bbca", "measure_id": "CA367", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Fishing Control", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.20000076, "percent_no": 37.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Business & Commerce | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 388, "fingerprint": "1938|CA366|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA366|Statewide", "content_hash": "9ad6520d0d13b755", "measure_id": "CA366", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Relief Administration", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.29999924, "percent_no": 41.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 387, "fingerprint": "1938|CA365|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA365|Statewide", "content_hash": "eb76379bb83601e8", "measure_id": "CA365", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Initiative", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.20000076, "percent_no": 45.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 386, "fingerprint": "1938|CA364|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA364|Statewide", "content_hash": "6cf23d99d9f03de4", "measure_id": "CA364", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "San Francisco Bay Exposition", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.09999847, "percent_no": 46.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 385, "fingerprint": "1938|CA363|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA363|Statewide", "content_hash": "b2e2953c4ccf7883", "measure_id": "CA363", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "State Money", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.29999924, "percent_no": 54.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 384, "fingerprint": "1938|CA362|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA362|Statewide", "content_hash": "f7601a731e814180", "measure_id": "CA362", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Judicial Council", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.29999924, "percent_no": 54.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 383, "fingerprint": "1938|CA361|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA361|Statewide", "content_hash": "124a3d7c4a2eb66f", "measure_id": "CA361", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 25", "description": "Retirement Life Payments", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.90000153, "percent_no": 55.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 25", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2025%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_25_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2025%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 382, "fingerprint": "1938|CA360|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA360|Statewide", "content_hash": "6b7359690cb2bfba", "measure_id": "CA360", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Retirement of Judges", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.70000076, "percent_no": 57.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 381, "fingerprint": "1938|CA359|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA359|Statewide", "content_hash": "45479d6df7982a3d", "measure_id": "CA359", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Labor", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.0, "percent_no": 58.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 380, "fingerprint": "1938|CA358|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA358|Statewide", "content_hash": "aff9314c780ef6d5", "measure_id": "CA358", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Highway and Traffic Safety Commission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.0, "percent_no": 60.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have created a Highway and Traffic Safety Commission in Ca...", "summary_text": "This measure would have created a Highway and Traffic Safety Commission in California to oversee highway and traffic safety matters. The commission would have been given authority to regulate and improve safety conditions on the state's roadways.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 379, "fingerprint": "1938|CA357|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA357|Statewide", "content_hash": "1a83d53a41256820", "measure_id": "CA357", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Veterans Tax Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.40000153, "percent_no": 60.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 378, "fingerprint": "1938|CA356|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA356|Statewide", "content_hash": "2493badb96f1c5f8", "measure_id": "CA356", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "City Charters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.29999924, "percent_no": 60.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 377, "fingerprint": "1938|CA355|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA355|Statewide", "content_hash": "24f46034cb9288da", "measure_id": "CA355", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Church, Orphanage, and College Tax Exemptions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.5, "percent_no": 63.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to exempt churche...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the California Constitution to exempt churches, orphanages, and colleges from property taxes. The proposition failed with 36.5% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 376, "fingerprint": "1938|CA354|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA354|Statewide", "content_hash": "e42872fee60e85cd", "measure_id": "CA354", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Regulation of Pounds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.29999924, "percent_no": 68.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 375, "fingerprint": "1938|CA353|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA353|Statewide", "content_hash": "637a0531ed350180", "measure_id": "CA353", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "State and County Boards of Equalization", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 28.29999924, "percent_no": 71.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | State Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have restructured California's property tax assessment sys...", "summary_text": "This measure would have restructured California's property tax assessment system by modifying the composition and duties of state and county boards of equalization. The proposal aimed to change how property values were determined and equalized across different jurisdictions for taxation purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 374, "fingerprint": "1938|CA352|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA352|Statewide", "content_hash": "4a0e6edfcf81db08", "measure_id": "CA352", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Revenue Bond Act of 1937", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 26.10000038, "percent_no": 73.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Energy & Electric Utilities\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 373, "fingerprint": "1938|CA351|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA351|Statewide", "content_hash": "c978889953343da8", "measure_id": "CA351", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Apportionment of Funds to Political Subdivisions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 25.60000038, "percent_no": 74.39999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Local Government | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1938 California ballot measure would have changed how state funds were d...", "summary_text": "This 1938 California ballot measure would have changed how state funds were distributed to local political subdivisions such as counties, cities, and school districts. The measure failed with only 25.6% of voters supporting the proposed reapportionment system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 372, "fingerprint": "1938|CA350|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA350|Statewide", "content_hash": "795fbcae96dda48a", "measure_id": "CA350", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Legislative Help", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 24.70000076, "percent_no": 75.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 371, "fingerprint": "1938|CA349|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA349|Statewide", "content_hash": "fe7c00305383e879", "measure_id": "CA349", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Oil Leases on State-Owned Tidelands at Huntington Beach", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 22.79999924, "percent_no": 77.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized oil leases on state-owned tidelands at Hun...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized oil leases on state-owned tidelands at Huntington Beach. The proposal failed with only 22.8% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 370, "fingerprint": "1938|CA348|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA348|Statewide", "content_hash": "ebf77759e5053ba3", "measure_id": "CA348", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Lending or Gift of Public Money", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 21.39999962, "percent_no": 78.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Human Services | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited the state and local governments from lendi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited the state and local governments from lending or giving public money, credit, or property to private individuals, corporations, or associations, with limited exceptions for public purposes. It would have required strict constitutional restrictions on the use of public funds to assist private entities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 369, "fingerprint": "1938|CA347|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA347|Statewide", "content_hash": "42b3c269843a5b3f", "measure_id": "CA347", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 16.89999962, "percent_no": 83.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 368, "fingerprint": "1938|CA346|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1938|CA346|Statewide", "content_hash": "69918bdef00e4376", "measure_id": "CA346", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1938, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 24", "description": "Leasing State-Owned Tidelands for Oil Drilling", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 15.10000038, "percent_no": 84.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have allowed the state of California to lease state...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have allowed the state of California to lease state-owned tidelands to private companies for oil drilling operations. The measure failed, with only 15.1% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 24", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%201938", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(1938)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%201938", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 367, "fingerprint": "1936|CA345|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA345|Statewide", "content_hash": "65f34a3f07cecdc1", "measure_id": "CA345", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Relief to Assessment Districts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.90000153, "percent_no": 47.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 366, "fingerprint": "1936|CA344|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA344|Statewide", "content_hash": "6945eae11951a5c0", "measure_id": "CA344", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 24", "description": "Charters of Cities, or Cities and Counties", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.59999847, "percent_no": 47.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed California cities and cities-counties to adopt their own...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed California cities and cities-counties to adopt their own charters through local voter approval, rather than requiring state legislative approval. It gave municipalities greater autonomy in establishing their governmental structure and operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 24", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 365, "fingerprint": "1936|CA343|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA343|Statewide", "content_hash": "1870c7cb4dda6de6", "measure_id": "CA343", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Penal Institutions for Punishment of Female Felons", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.20000076, "percent_no": 49.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1936 California ballot measure authorized the establishment of separate ...", "summary_text": "This 1936 California ballot measure authorized the establishment of separate penal institutions specifically designed for the punishment and incarceration of women convicted of felonies. The measure passed with 50.2% of the vote, enabling the state to create dedicated female correctional facilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 364, "fingerprint": "1936|CA342|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA342|Statewide", "content_hash": "7f9dffa14313fb02", "measure_id": "CA342", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Prohibiting Tideland Surface Oil Drilling. Authorizing Slant Drilling from Uplands.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.29999924, "percent_no": 52.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Environmental Protection | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited oil drilling on the surface of California'...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited oil drilling on the surface of California's tidelands while allowing slant drilling operations conducted from upland areas. The measure failed with 47.3% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 363, "fingerprint": "1936|CA341|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA341|Statewide", "content_hash": "c07e2d3cbc70fea3", "measure_id": "CA341", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Consolidated City and County Government", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.20000076, "percent_no": 52.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed cities and counties in California to consolid...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed cities and counties in California to consolidate their governments into unified city-county entities. The consolidated governments would have combined the administrative functions and jurisdictions of both municipal and county operations under a single governing structure.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 362, "fingerprint": "1936|CA340|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA340|Statewide", "content_hash": "784050101ed51b50", "measure_id": "CA340", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Legislative Printing", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.90000153, "percent_no": 54.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 361, "fingerprint": "1936|CA339|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA339|Statewide", "content_hash": "70dabd58272b8408", "measure_id": "CA339", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Water Districts and Water Conservation Districts.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.40000153, "percent_no": 55.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1936 California ballot measure would have created or modified the legal ...", "summary_text": "This 1936 California ballot measure would have created or modified the legal framework for water districts and water conservation districts in the state. The measure failed with 44.4% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 360, "fingerprint": "1936|CA338|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA338|Statewide", "content_hash": "24c1094cbd4c8dea", "measure_id": "CA338", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Motor Vehicle Fuel Taxes and License Fees", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.90000153, "percent_no": 56.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1936 California ballot measure would have modified the state's motor veh...", "summary_text": "This 1936 California ballot measure would have modified the state's motor vehicle fuel taxes and license fees, though the specific changes are not detailed in the provided ballot text. The measure failed with 43.9% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 359, "fingerprint": "1936|CA337|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA337|Statewide", "content_hash": "6fadf373dc710f5a", "measure_id": "CA337", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Retail Store License", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.79999924, "percent_no": 56.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 358, "fingerprint": "1936|CA336|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA336|Statewide", "content_hash": "8dfa60ad357cf826", "measure_id": "CA336", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Publicly-Owned Museums or Art Galleries", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.5, "percent_no": 56.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Local Government | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed the state and local governments to acquire, o...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed the state and local governments to acquire, own, and operate museums and art galleries using public funds. It would have authorized public entities to purchase artworks, artifacts, and related materials for these publicly-owned cultural institutions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 357, "fingerprint": "1936|CA335|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA335|Statewide", "content_hash": "07c8450e90a2f11c", "measure_id": "CA335", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Amending Los Angeles City Charter", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.40000153, "percent_no": 57.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have amended the Los Angeles City Charter, though the spec...", "summary_text": "This measure would have amended the Los Angeles City Charter, though the specific changes are not detailed in the provided ballot text. The statewide ballot measure failed with 42.4% support in 1936.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 356, "fingerprint": "1936|CA334|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA334|Statewide", "content_hash": "633cb90685bedab8", "measure_id": "CA334", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Los Angeles County Exposition Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.90000153, "percent_no": 61.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the issuance of bonds to fund the Los Ange...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the issuance of bonds to fund the Los Angeles County Exposition. The bonds would have been repaid through local taxation in Los Angeles County.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 355, "fingerprint": "1936|CA333|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA333|Statewide", "content_hash": "6f1a78083d12db8e", "measure_id": "CA333", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Personal Income Taxes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.20000076, "percent_no": 61.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 354, "fingerprint": "1936|CA332|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA332|Statewide", "content_hash": "3c03e32f23b4820e", "measure_id": "CA332", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "County and Municipal Civil Service", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.29999924, "percent_no": 63.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have established civil service systems for county a...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have established civil service systems for county and municipal government employees in California, creating merit-based hiring and job protection procedures. The measure failed with 36.3% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 353, "fingerprint": "1936|CA331|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA331|Statewide", "content_hash": "b54e793f7aefc9f8", "measure_id": "CA331", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Liquor Control", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.29999924, "percent_no": 65.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 352, "fingerprint": "1936|CA330|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA330|Statewide", "content_hash": "bb8397e9c3251283", "measure_id": "CA330", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Intoxicating Liquors. Local Option.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.79999924, "percent_no": 67.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed local jurisdictions in California to decide w...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed local jurisdictions in California to decide whether to permit or prohibit the sale of intoxicating liquors within their boundaries. It would have given cities and counties the authority to implement their own alcohol regulations through local option voting.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 351, "fingerprint": "1936|CA329|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA329|Statewide", "content_hash": "b20c2cadeb813137", "measure_id": "CA329", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Registration of Voters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 28.29999924, "percent_no": 71.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 350, "fingerprint": "1936|CA328|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA328|Statewide", "content_hash": "a7b00fbcffbd2615", "measure_id": "CA328", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Instructors' Tenure", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 25.79999924, "percent_no": 74.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 349, "fingerprint": "1936|CA327|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA327|Statewide", "content_hash": "1057a425f02b22d2", "measure_id": "CA327", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Oleomargarine Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 20.89999962, "percent_no": 79.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Business & Commerce | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 348, "fingerprint": "1936|CA326|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA326|Statewide", "content_hash": "d212d3396886db4b", "measure_id": "CA326", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Eminent Domain", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 20.10000038, "percent_no": 79.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 347, "fingerprint": "1936|CA325|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA325|Statewide", "content_hash": "faa7d4c21b824841", "measure_id": "CA325", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Public Service Commission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 18.70000076, "percent_no": 81.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 346, "fingerprint": "1936|CA324|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1936|CA324|Statewide", "content_hash": "ed53bfc09df6adc9", "measure_id": "CA324", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1936, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Court of Criminal Appeals", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 16.79999924, "percent_no": 83.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201936", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1936)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201936", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 345, "fingerprint": "1935|CA323|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1935|CA323|Statewide", "content_hash": "528193380b988847", "measure_id": "CA323", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1935, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "State Building Bond Act of 1935", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.70000076, "percent_no": 53.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The State Building Bond Act of 1935 would have authorized the state to issue ...", "summary_text": "The State Building Bond Act of 1935 would have authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construction of public buildings and infrastructure projects. The measure failed with 46.7% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201935", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1935)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201935", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 344, "fingerprint": "1935|CA322|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1935|CA322|Statewide", "content_hash": "3bedebb2009c4c17", "measure_id": "CA322", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1935, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Rector Dam Project", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.79999924, "percent_no": 57.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Natural Resources | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201935", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1935)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201935", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 343, "fingerprint": "1935|CA321|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1935|CA321|Statewide", "content_hash": "2614f1d7cd20b355", "measure_id": "CA321", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1935, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Authorizing State's Borrowing Money in Anticipation of Taxes and Revenues", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.59999847, "percent_no": 65.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state of California to borrow money in...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state of California to borrow money in anticipation of receiving future tax collections and other revenues. The borrowed funds would have provided the state with immediate access to money before the actual taxes and revenues were collected.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201935", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1935)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201935", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 342, "fingerprint": "1934|CA320|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA320|Statewide", "content_hash": "3d674d540b349b8c", "measure_id": "CA320", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Pleading Guilty Before Committing Magistrate", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.56999969, "percent_no": 46.43000031, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1934 California ballot measure allowed defendants to plead guilty to cri...", "summary_text": "This 1934 California ballot measure allowed defendants to plead guilty to criminal charges before a committing magistrate rather than requiring them to appear before a higher court. The measure streamlined the criminal justice process by enabling guilty pleas to be entered at an earlier stage in proceedings.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 341, "fingerprint": "1934|CA319|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA319|Statewide", "content_hash": "87e2355c2e2e3211", "measure_id": "CA319", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "State Civil Service", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 78.69999695, "percent_no": 21.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 340, "fingerprint": "1934|CA318|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA318|Statewide", "content_hash": "ce74957e776c861e", "measure_id": "CA318", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Stock Ownership by Cities in Mutual Water Companies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 76.09999847, "percent_no": 23.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized California cities to own stock in mutual water companies", "summary_text": "This measure authorized California cities to own stock in mutual water companies. It allowed municipalities to participate as shareholders in these cooperative water utilities alongside private stockholders.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 339, "fingerprint": "1934|CA317|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA317|Statewide", "content_hash": "f20ad2d0eede8bde", "measure_id": "CA317", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Permitting Comment on Evidence and Failure of Defendant to Testify in Criminal Cases", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.90000153, "percent_no": 26.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure permitted judges and prosecutors to comment on evidence and on a...", "summary_text": "This measure permitted judges and prosecutors to comment on evidence and on a defendant's failure to testify in criminal cases. It modified existing protections that previously prohibited such commentary in California courts.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 338, "fingerprint": "1934|CA316|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA316|Statewide", "content_hash": "17b4aa68e6e708a3", "measure_id": "CA316", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Unemployment Relief Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.80000305, "percent_no": 27.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 337, "fingerprint": "1934|CA315|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA315|Statewide", "content_hash": "60d95b43d3c9cacf", "measure_id": "CA315", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Attorney General", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.0, "percent_no": 29.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 336, "fingerprint": "1934|CA314|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA314|Statewide", "content_hash": "f5908337b6b0043c", "measure_id": "CA314", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Eminent Domain", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.30000305, "percent_no": 29.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 335, "fingerprint": "1934|CA313|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA313|Statewide", "content_hash": "318a6f86d02b6f2c", "measure_id": "CA313", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Claims and Budgets", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.80000305, "percent_no": 32.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 334, "fingerprint": "1934|CA312|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA312|Statewide", "content_hash": "13999f8bb75f5194", "measure_id": "CA312", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Intoxicating Liquors", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.69999695, "percent_no": 32.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 333, "fingerprint": "1934|CA311|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA311|Statewide", "content_hash": "46d0b66b247c38e5", "measure_id": "CA311", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Veterans' Welfare Bond Act of 1933", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.90000153, "percent_no": 36.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The Veterans' Welfare Bond Act of 1933 authorized the state of California to ...", "summary_text": "The Veterans' Welfare Bond Act of 1933 authorized the state of California to issue bonds to fund welfare programs and benefits for military veterans. The measure provided a financing mechanism for veteran-related services and support programs through state-backed bond issuance.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 332, "fingerprint": "1934|CA310|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA310|Statewide", "content_hash": "c92ed6adeab129c5", "measure_id": "CA310", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Interest Rates", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.79999924, "percent_no": 39.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 331, "fingerprint": "1934|CA309|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA309|Statewide", "content_hash": "f7792a91fec75889", "measure_id": "CA309", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Municipal Courts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.70000076, "percent_no": 47.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 330, "fingerprint": "1934|CA308|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA308|Statewide", "content_hash": "f0f1eb0d01257839", "measure_id": "CA308", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Selection of Judges", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.40000153, "percent_no": 47.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 329, "fingerprint": "1934|CA307|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA307|Statewide", "content_hash": "96e49e5ba535729f", "measure_id": "CA307", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Constitutional Convention", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.40000153, "percent_no": 48.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 328, "fingerprint": "1934|CA306|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA306|Statewide", "content_hash": "6e907aa03ed7f886", "measure_id": "CA306", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Authorizing Agreements by Political Subdivisions for Joint Exercise of Powers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.90000153, "percent_no": 51.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized California's political subdivisions (such ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized California's political subdivisions (such as cities, counties, and special districts) to enter into agreements with each other to jointly exercise their governmental powers. It aimed to allow local government entities to collaborate and share responsibilities for providing public services more efficiently.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 327, "fingerprint": "1934|CA305|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA305|Statewide", "content_hash": "2637d24bfcdf2ae4", "measure_id": "CA305", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Superior Court Judges", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.40000153, "percent_no": 52.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 326, "fingerprint": "1934|CA304|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA304|Statewide", "content_hash": "48ac332daedc96c5", "measure_id": "CA304", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Superior Court: Judicial Election Districts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.20000076, "percent_no": 56.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have divided California into judicial election districts f...", "summary_text": "This measure would have divided California into judicial election districts for Superior Court judges, changing from the existing system of electing judges countywide. The proposal aimed to create smaller geographic areas within counties for the purpose of selecting Superior Court judges.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 325, "fingerprint": "1934|CA303|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA303|Statewide", "content_hash": "6f2b28e1c25329a0", "measure_id": "CA303", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Water Resources", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.70000076, "percent_no": 61.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 324, "fingerprint": "1934|CA302|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA302|Statewide", "content_hash": "948040e004e0e203", "measure_id": "CA302", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Making the State Board of Education Elective; Abolishing Superintendent of Public Instruction; Providing for Director of Education", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.09999847, "percent_no": 61.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have made the State Board of Education an elected body and...", "summary_text": "This measure would have made the State Board of Education an elected body and replaced the Superintendent of Public Instruction position with a Director of Education. The proposal aimed to restructure California's educational governance by changing how the state's top education officials are selected and organized.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 323, "fingerprint": "1934|CA301|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA301|Statewide", "content_hash": "7ed6d079ceaf5cf8", "measure_id": "CA301", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Chiropractic", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.0, "percent_no": 62.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 322, "fingerprint": "1934|CA300|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA300|Statewide", "content_hash": "9c2729a219e1da63", "measure_id": "CA300", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "State Indebtedness", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.09999847, "percent_no": 63.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 321, "fingerprint": "1934|CA299|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA299|Statewide", "content_hash": "5fdb7b8c267740d6", "measure_id": "CA299", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Naturopathic Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.60000038, "percent_no": 69.39999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 320, "fingerprint": "1934|CA298|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1934|CA298|Statewide", "content_hash": "7c6ed0b2d9df252c", "measure_id": "CA298", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1934, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Local Option", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 26.70000076, "percent_no": 73.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201934", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1934)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201934", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 319, "fingerprint": "1933|CA297|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1933|CA297|Statewide", "content_hash": "df2459eec21928e4", "measure_id": "CA297", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1933, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Declaring Effective Dates of Acts of Legislature", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 74.40000153, "percent_no": 25.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure established that acts passed by the California Legislatur...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure established that acts passed by the California Legislature would take effect 90 days after the end of the legislative session in which they were enacted, unless the act specified a different effective date or was declared an urgency measure.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201933", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1933)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201933", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 318, "fingerprint": "1933|CA296|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1933|CA296|Statewide", "content_hash": "28b44e82293c391e", "measure_id": "CA296", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1933, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Unemployment Relief Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.59999847, "percent_no": 26.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Labor & Employment | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201933", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1933)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201933", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 317, "fingerprint": "1933|CA295|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1933|CA295|Statewide", "content_hash": "77fc173b7efc0dd1", "measure_id": "CA295", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1933, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Exempting Property Damaged by Earthquake in Los Angeles and Orange Counties", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.59999847, "percent_no": 29.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure exempted property in Los Angeles and Orange Counties that was da...", "summary_text": "This measure exempted property in Los Angeles and Orange Counties that was damaged by earthquake from certain taxes or assessments. It provided tax relief for earthquake-damaged properties in these two counties.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201933", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1933)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201933", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 316, "fingerprint": "1933|CA294|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1933|CA294|Statewide", "content_hash": "4a3d2fe69ae224ca", "measure_id": "CA294", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1933, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "County Government", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.19999695, "percent_no": 31.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201933", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1933)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201933", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 315, "fingerprint": "1933|CA293|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1933|CA293|Statewide", "content_hash": "6e1c4c2a8a87fda1", "measure_id": "CA293", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1933, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Horse Racing", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.90000153, "percent_no": 37.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Gambling & Lotteries\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201933", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1933)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201933", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 314, "fingerprint": "1933|CA292|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1933|CA292|Statewide", "content_hash": "d7eb4cfa7bdd5846", "measure_id": "CA292", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1933, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.0, "percent_no": 38.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Insurance | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201933", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1933)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201933", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 313, "fingerprint": "1933|CA291|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1933|CA291|Statewide", "content_hash": "497d8a6bd55182d8", "measure_id": "CA291", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1933, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "State Bonds for Refinancing Irrigation and Reclamation Districts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.29999924, "percent_no": 58.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Bond Measures | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to refinance the ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to refinance the debts of irrigation and reclamation districts in California. The proposal aimed to provide financial assistance to these districts by allowing the state to take on their existing obligations through bond issuance.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201933", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1933)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201933", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 312, "fingerprint": "1933|CA290|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1933|CA290|Statewide", "content_hash": "e13cb2f4129db25e", "measure_id": "CA290", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1933, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Exempting Educational Institutions from Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.20000076, "percent_no": 59.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have exempted educational institutions from taxation in Ca...", "summary_text": "This measure would have exempted educational institutions from taxation in California. The measure failed with 40.2% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201933", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1933)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201933", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 311, "fingerprint": "1933|CA289|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1933|CA289|Statewide", "content_hash": "b6add5a8e5f352f3", "measure_id": "CA289", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1933, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Diverting Gasoline Tax Funds for Biennium Ending June 30, 1933", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.79999924, "percent_no": 72.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed California to divert gasoline tax funds away ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed California to divert gasoline tax funds away from their designated purpose during the two-year period ending June 30, 1933. The proposal failed with only 27.8% voter support.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201933", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1933)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201933", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 310, "fingerprint": "1933|CA288|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1933|CA288|Statewide", "content_hash": "bb0c328373cb44e5", "measure_id": "CA288", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1933, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Diverting Gasoline Tax Funds for Biennium Ending June 30, 1935", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 25.70000076, "percent_no": 74.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have diverted gasoline tax funds during the two-year perio...", "summary_text": "This measure would have diverted gasoline tax funds during the two-year period ending June 30, 1935, redirecting them from their typical highway and road purposes to other state uses. The proposal failed with only 25.7% voter support.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201933", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1933)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201933", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 309, "fingerprint": "1932|CA287|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA287|Statewide", "content_hash": "6d5a785b10d721d7", "measure_id": "CA287", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Authorizing City of Glendale, After Elections Therefor, to Pay Owners Certain Improvement Assessments Upon Their Properties", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 77.19999695, "percent_no": 22.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the City of Glendale to pay property owners' improvem...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the City of Glendale to pay property owners' improvement assessments on their properties, contingent upon local elections being held to approve such payments.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 308, "fingerprint": "1932|CA286|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA286|Statewide", "content_hash": "6163dd81c4bb3919", "measure_id": "CA286", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Authorizing City of Escondido to Hold Stock in Mutual Water Company", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 76.80000305, "percent_no": 23.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the City of Escondido to purchase and hold sto...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the City of Escondido to purchase and hold stock in a mutual water company. The measure passed, allowing the city to become a shareholder in such a company for water supply purposes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 307, "fingerprint": "1932|CA285|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA285|Statewide", "content_hash": "2dcd455696ab7ae8", "measure_id": "CA285", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Wright Act Repeal", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.90000153, "percent_no": 31.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 306, "fingerprint": "1932|CA284|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA284|Statewide", "content_hash": "f2ed4a5f618c603d", "measure_id": "CA284", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "State Liquor Regulation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.19999695, "percent_no": 35.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 305, "fingerprint": "1932|CA283|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA283|Statewide", "content_hash": "e41fec84102de4a4", "measure_id": "CA283", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Deposit of Public Moneys", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.70000076, "percent_no": 37.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 304, "fingerprint": "1932|CA282|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA282|Statewide", "content_hash": "52a61eb9e685f94a", "measure_id": "CA282", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Initiative and Referendum", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.79999924, "percent_no": 38.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 303, "fingerprint": "1932|CA281|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA281|Statewide", "content_hash": "f2a7bc46992b940d", "measure_id": "CA281", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "City Charters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.29999924, "percent_no": 38.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 302, "fingerprint": "1932|CA280|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA280|Statewide", "content_hash": "c29454d5a38c42b2", "measure_id": "CA280", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Exempting Vessels from Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.0, "percent_no": 40.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure exempted vessels from taxation in California", "summary_text": "This measure exempted vessels from taxation in California. It passed in 1932 with 60% voter approval, removing ships and boats from the state's tax base.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 301, "fingerprint": "1932|CA279|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA279|Statewide", "content_hash": "0758fc851f7b8256", "measure_id": "CA279", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Preventing Leasing of State-Owned Tide or Beach Lands for Mineral and Oil Production", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.29999924, "percent_no": 40.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure prohibited the state of California from leasing state-owned tide...", "summary_text": "This measure prohibited the state of California from leasing state-owned tidelands and beach lands for mineral and oil extraction purposes. It prevented the state from granting drilling rights on these coastal properties to private companies.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 300, "fingerprint": "1932|CA278|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA278|Statewide", "content_hash": "7fcfa26e5a896703", "measure_id": "CA278", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Tax Liens", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.59999847, "percent_no": 44.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 299, "fingerprint": "1932|CA277|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA277|Statewide", "content_hash": "acdb64cf82c02401", "measure_id": "CA277", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Amending State Athletic Commission Initiative Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.90000153, "percent_no": 46.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Military & Veterans Affairs | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the State Athletic Commission Initiative Act, though the...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the State Athletic Commission Initiative Act, though the specific changes made to the commission's powers or operations are not detailed in the provided ballot text.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 298, "fingerprint": "1932|CA276|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA276|Statewide", "content_hash": "199e606a08d2d5b2", "measure_id": "CA276", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "War Veterans Tax Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.5, "percent_no": 49.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 297, "fingerprint": "1932|CA275|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA275|Statewide", "content_hash": "3d8ed558c4d900f4", "measure_id": "CA275", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Racing", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.59999847, "percent_no": 51.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Gambling & Lotteries | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 296, "fingerprint": "1932|CA274|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA274|Statewide", "content_hash": "40dc152ae643d407", "measure_id": "CA274", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "City Charter Provisions for Nomination and Election of Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.5, "percent_no": 51.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1932 California ballot measure would have amended state law to establish...", "summary_text": "This 1932 California ballot measure would have amended state law to establish standardized provisions for how cities nominate and elect their municipal officers through their city charters. The measure failed with 48.5% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 295, "fingerprint": "1932|CA273|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA273|Statewide", "content_hash": "6d84d84b15c76bcf", "measure_id": "CA273", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "County Charter Provisions for Nomination and Election of Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.59999847, "percent_no": 52.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed counties to include provisions in their chart...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed counties to include provisions in their charters for nominating and electing county officers. It would have given counties more local control over their election processes and procedures for county positions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 294, "fingerprint": "1932|CA272|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA272|Statewide", "content_hash": "e124f6462345cae7", "measure_id": "CA272", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Authorizing Board of Supervisors to Draft County Charter", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.5, "percent_no": 59.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized boards of supervisors in California counti...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized boards of supervisors in California counties to draft county charters. It failed with 40.5% of voters supporting it in 1932.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 293, "fingerprint": "1932|CA271|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA271|Statewide", "content_hash": "8bfcc267b1a2bcde", "measure_id": "CA271", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Tideland Grant to City of Huntington Beach", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.70000076, "percent_no": 60.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have granted tidelands to the City of Huntington Beach", "summary_text": "This measure would have granted tidelands to the City of Huntington Beach. The proposal failed with 39.7% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 292, "fingerprint": "1932|CA270|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA270|Statewide", "content_hash": "5c2314c3b2a23def", "measure_id": "CA270", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Removing Restriction Upon Use of State's Half of Highway Transportation Taxes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 33.0, "percent_no": 67.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have removed restrictions on how California could u...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have removed restrictions on how California could use its half of highway transportation tax revenue, allowing the state greater flexibility in spending these funds beyond highway purposes. The measure failed with only 33% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 291, "fingerprint": "1932|CA269|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA269|Statewide", "content_hash": "3d67b0291aab446e", "measure_id": "CA269", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "School Funds. Income, Sales Tax.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.59999847, "percent_no": 67.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1932 California ballot measure would have established income and sales t...", "summary_text": "This 1932 California ballot measure would have established income and sales taxes to fund schools. The measure failed with only 32.6% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 290, "fingerprint": "1932|CA268|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA268|Statewide", "content_hash": "51ae8af4607951ee", "measure_id": "CA268", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Foreclosure of Mortgages and Trust Deeds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 25.89999962, "percent_no": 74.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited the foreclosure of mortgages and trust dee...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited the foreclosure of mortgages and trust deeds on real property in California. The prohibition would have remained in effect until the state legislature enacted alternative legislation addressing mortgage foreclosures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 289, "fingerprint": "1932|CA267|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA267|Statewide", "content_hash": "810239aaaf45d0a6", "measure_id": "CA267", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Oil Control", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 21.20000076, "percent_no": 78.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 288, "fingerprint": "1932|CA266|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1932|CA266|Statewide", "content_hash": "bef82a11f15c0735", "measure_id": "CA266", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1932, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Legislative Expenses", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 17.79999924, "percent_no": 82.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201932", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1932)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201932", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 287, "fingerprint": "1930|CA265|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA265|Statewide", "content_hash": "0c6f1d3d787edacf", "measure_id": "CA265", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Authorizing Indemnity to Owners of Livestock Destroyed to Prevent Spread of Disease", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 82.90000153, "percent_no": 17.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state to provide financial compensation to...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state to provide financial compensation to livestock owners whose animals were destroyed by government order to prevent the spread of disease. It established a system for indemnifying farmers and ranchers for their economic losses when their livestock had to be killed for public health reasons.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 286, "fingerprint": "1930|CA264|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA264|Statewide", "content_hash": "be4b5a992e1ab19f", "measure_id": "CA264", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Veterans' Welfare Bond Act of 1929", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.90000153, "percent_no": 24.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "The measure authorized the issuance of bonds to fund veterans' welfare progra...", "summary_text": "The measure authorized the issuance of bonds to fund veterans' welfare programs and services. It allowed California to borrow money through bond sales to provide benefits and support for military veterans.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 285, "fingerprint": "1930|CA263|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA263|Statewide", "content_hash": "06e3f7d939728304", "measure_id": "CA263", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Taxation of Ocean Marine Insurers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.90000153, "percent_no": 24.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the taxation of ocean marine insurance companies oper...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the taxation of ocean marine insurance companies operating in California. It allowed the state to impose taxes on insurers providing coverage for ships and maritime cargo.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 284, "fingerprint": "1930|CA262|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA262|Statewide", "content_hash": "4b729f65fc001e03", "measure_id": "CA262", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "San Francisco Harbor Improvement Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.80000305, "percent_no": 24.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the San Francisco Harbor Improvement Act, which would...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the San Francisco Harbor Improvement Act, which would have provided funding and legal framework for infrastructure improvements to San Francisco's harbor facilities. The act aimed to enhance the harbor's capacity and modernize port operations through various construction and development projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 283, "fingerprint": "1930|CA261|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA261|Statewide", "content_hash": "3489affa3d84a873", "measure_id": "CA261", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Judiciary Disqualifications", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.59999847, "percent_no": 29.400001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 282, "fingerprint": "1930|CA260|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA260|Statewide", "content_hash": "3a8844ae3ec49599", "measure_id": "CA260", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Taxation on Street Railways", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.59999847, "percent_no": 34.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 281, "fingerprint": "1930|CA259|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA259|Statewide", "content_hash": "8c3f2de31c712b43", "measure_id": "CA259", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Municipal Charter Amendments", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.19999695, "percent_no": 35.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 280, "fingerprint": "1930|CA258|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA258|Statewide", "content_hash": "d835431fc8089db4", "measure_id": "CA258", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Huntington Library and Art Gallery", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.90000153, "percent_no": 39.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the creation of the Huntington Library and Art Galler...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the creation of the Huntington Library and Art Gallery as a public institution. It established the legal framework for the library and art gallery to operate and receive public support in California.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 279, "fingerprint": "1930|CA257|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA257|Statewide", "content_hash": "199bb95372c8452d", "measure_id": "CA257", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 25", "description": "Suffrage", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.20000076, "percent_no": 39.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 25", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2025%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_25_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2025%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 278, "fingerprint": "1930|CA256|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA256|Statewide", "content_hash": "a4557bba0e18927b", "measure_id": "CA256", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Corporations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.5, "percent_no": 40.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 277, "fingerprint": "1930|CA255|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA255|Statewide", "content_hash": "c794d145296bedee", "measure_id": "CA255", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Registration of Voters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.70000076, "percent_no": 42.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 276, "fingerprint": "1930|CA254|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA254|Statewide", "content_hash": "c63316e1e056953a", "measure_id": "CA254", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "State Employees Retirement Salaries", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.59999847, "percent_no": 48.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1930 California ballot measure established or modified a retirement syst...", "summary_text": "This 1930 California ballot measure established or modified a retirement system for state employees, providing pension benefits based on their salaries. The measure passed with 51.6% of the vote, creating a formal retirement structure for government workers in the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 275, "fingerprint": "1930|CA253|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA253|Statewide", "content_hash": "9b817d54fc5eb4a8", "measure_id": "CA253", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Legislative Help - Limitation on Expenses Therefore", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.5, "percent_no": 50.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1930 California ballot measure would have imposed limitations on expense...", "summary_text": "This 1930 California ballot measure would have imposed limitations on expenses related to legislative assistance. The measure failed with 49.5% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 274, "fingerprint": "1930|CA252|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA252|Statewide", "content_hash": "d7965c9938764f7c", "measure_id": "CA252", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Taxation of Toll Bridges Acquired by State", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.29999924, "percent_no": 51.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed the state of California to impose taxes on to...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed the state of California to impose taxes on toll bridges that it acquired. The proposal failed to pass, receiving 48.3% support from voters.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 273, "fingerprint": "1930|CA251|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA251|Statewide", "content_hash": "8970350b75761ebe", "measure_id": "CA251", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 24", "description": "Absence of Judicial Officers from State. Authorizing Legislature to Change Number of Superior Judges.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.20000076, "percent_no": 52.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have allowed the California Legislature to change t...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have allowed the California Legislature to change the number of superior court judges and addressed provisions regarding judicial officers being absent from the state. The measure failed with 47.2% support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 24", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 272, "fingerprint": "1930|CA250|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA250|Statewide", "content_hash": "dda78d1f6b9c9ec1", "measure_id": "CA250", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Governor's Council", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.59999847, "percent_no": 59.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 271, "fingerprint": "1930|CA249|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA249|Statewide", "content_hash": "91135234e3126ff5", "measure_id": "CA249", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Fish and Game", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.40000153, "percent_no": 59.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 270, "fingerprint": "1930|CA248|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA248|Statewide", "content_hash": "0e6da360a3d16375", "measure_id": "CA248", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Changing Motor Vehicle Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.29999924, "percent_no": 59.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have changed how motor vehicles were taxed in California, ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have changed how motor vehicles were taxed in California, though the specific details of the proposed taxation changes are not provided in the ballot text. The measure failed with 40.3% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 269, "fingerprint": "1930|CA247|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA247|Statewide", "content_hash": "e8021dacbe4d812e", "measure_id": "CA247", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Reimbursing Counties for Losses from State Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.09999847, "percent_no": 60.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | State Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have provided reimbursement to counties for revenue losses...", "summary_text": "This measure would have provided reimbursement to counties for revenue losses they incurred due to state taxation policies. The proposal aimed to compensate local governments for financial impacts resulting from state-level tax decisions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 268, "fingerprint": "1930|CA246|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA246|Statewide", "content_hash": "10742bf702af2697", "measure_id": "CA246", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Exempting Hospitals and Sanitoriums from Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.79999924, "percent_no": 61.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have exempted hospitals and sanatoriums from taxation in C...", "summary_text": "This measure would have exempted hospitals and sanatoriums from taxation in California. The measure failed with 38.8% of voters supporting it in 1930.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 267, "fingerprint": "1930|CA245|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA245|Statewide", "content_hash": "8f5e8b80890779be", "measure_id": "CA245", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Compensation of State Executive Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.20000076, "percent_no": 62.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would have set specific compensation levels for Californi...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would have set specific compensation levels for California's state executive officers, including the governor and other statewide elected officials. The measure failed with 37.2% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 266, "fingerprint": "1930|CA244|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA244|Statewide", "content_hash": "d09b7c328cb50a2a", "measure_id": "CA244", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Constitutional Convention", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.10000038, "percent_no": 68.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 265, "fingerprint": "1930|CA243|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA243|Statewide", "content_hash": "a1917df8797aeb84", "measure_id": "CA243", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Daylight Savings Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 24.29999924, "percent_no": 75.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 264, "fingerprint": "1930|CA242|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA242|Statewide", "content_hash": "d68df53402a66ff0", "measure_id": "CA242", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Apportioning State Taxes to Firemen's Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 24.20000076, "percent_no": 75.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Insurance | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allocated a portion of state taxes to fund firemen's ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allocated a portion of state taxes to fund firemen's pension and benefit funds. The proposal failed with only 24.2% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 263, "fingerprint": "1930|CA241|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA241|Statewide", "content_hash": "476d04e1b635713a", "measure_id": "CA241", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Usury Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 23.89999962, "percent_no": 76.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 262, "fingerprint": "1930|CA240|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1930|CA240|Statewide", "content_hash": "1d873111ad3569f8", "measure_id": "CA240", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1930, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 26", "description": "Sunday Closing Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 17.0, "percent_no": 83.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1930, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 26", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2026%201930", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_26_(1930)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2026%201930", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 261, "fingerprint": "1928|CA239|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA239|Statewide", "content_hash": "4c98f12eb433c8a0", "measure_id": "CA239", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Authorizing State Aid to Needy Blind Persons", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 82.5, "percent_no": 17.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state of California to provide financial assistan...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state of California to provide financial assistance to blind persons in need. It established a framework for state aid to support blind individuals who lacked sufficient resources.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 260, "fingerprint": "1928|CA238|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA238|Statewide", "content_hash": "8fe39fe93bbd5e0f", "measure_id": "CA238", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Acquisition of Rights of Way by State", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 78.80000305, "percent_no": 21.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state of California to acquire rights of w...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state of California to acquire rights of way for public purposes. It passed in 1928 with 78.8% voter approval.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 259, "fingerprint": "1928|CA237|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA237|Statewide", "content_hash": "4f799876b4979380", "measure_id": "CA237", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Water", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 77.19999695, "percent_no": 22.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 258, "fingerprint": "1928|CA236|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA236|Statewide", "content_hash": "efc654c699d9303c", "measure_id": "CA236", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Absent Voters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 76.5, "percent_no": 23.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 257, "fingerprint": "1928|CA235|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA235|Statewide", "content_hash": "228a587a7458c391", "measure_id": "CA235", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Authorizing State Aid to Needy Physically Handicapped Persons", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 76.30000305, "percent_no": 23.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state of California to provide financial assistan...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state of California to provide financial assistance to needy individuals with physical disabilities. It established a state aid program for physically handicapped persons who lacked sufficient resources to support themselves.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 256, "fingerprint": "1928|CA234|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA234|Statewide", "content_hash": "0f4c145b39717900", "measure_id": "CA234", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "California State Park Bonds Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.80000305, "percent_no": 26.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to acquire and develop land ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to acquire and develop land for California's state park system. The bonds would provide funding for purchasing property and creating recreational facilities for public use.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 255, "fingerprint": "1928|CA233|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA233|Statewide", "content_hash": "17dd16feb34c1055", "measure_id": "CA233", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Acquisition of Land for Public Improvements", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.40000153, "percent_no": 26.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure authorized the state of California to acquire land throug...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure authorized the state of California to acquire land through eminent domain or purchase for public improvement projects. It passed with 73.4% of the vote in 1928.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 254, "fingerprint": "1928|CA232|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA232|Statewide", "content_hash": "65b03a2b09db9d3c", "measure_id": "CA232", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.09999847, "percent_no": 26.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 253, "fingerprint": "1928|CA231|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA231|Statewide", "content_hash": "75a08e497fddc545", "measure_id": "CA231", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Improving California Olympiad Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 72.90000153, "percent_no": 27.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1928 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fi...", "summary_text": "This 1928 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance improvements for the 1932 Olympic Games to be held in Los Angeles. The measure passed with nearly 73% voter approval, providing funding for Olympic-related infrastructure and facilities.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 252, "fingerprint": "1928|CA230|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA230|Statewide", "content_hash": "ef380334691f37b1", "measure_id": "CA230", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Motor Vehicle Registration Fees", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.90000153, "percent_no": 28.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established motor vehicle registration fees in California to fun...", "summary_text": "This measure established motor vehicle registration fees in California to fund highway construction and maintenance. The fees would be collected from vehicle owners to generate revenue for the state's road infrastructure system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 251, "fingerprint": "1928|CA229|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA229|Statewide", "content_hash": "ed0f6b5f4b92687f", "measure_id": "CA229", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Authorizing Quasi-Public Corporations to Extend Term of Existence", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.09999847, "percent_no": 31.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized quasi-public corporations in California to extend the...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized quasi-public corporations in California to extend their terms of existence beyond the limits previously established by law. It allowed these corporations, which serve public purposes while operating as private entities, to continue operating for longer periods than originally permitted.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 250, "fingerprint": "1928|CA228|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA228|Statewide", "content_hash": "d752dfd7b6959e81", "measure_id": "CA228", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Waiving Jury Trial in Criminal Cases", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.40000153, "percent_no": 34.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed defendants in criminal cases to waive their right to a j...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed defendants in criminal cases to waive their right to a jury trial and instead have their case decided by a judge alone. It gave criminal defendants the option to choose between a jury trial and a bench trial presided over by a judge.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 249, "fingerprint": "1928|CA227|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA227|Statewide", "content_hash": "b2d0693d19282f36", "measure_id": "CA227", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Courts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.29999924, "percent_no": 38.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 248, "fingerprint": "1928|CA226|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA226|Statewide", "content_hash": "f5901724d6827715", "measure_id": "CA226", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Jurors' Fees", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.70000076, "percent_no": 43.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 247, "fingerprint": "1928|CA225|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA225|Statewide", "content_hash": "e810f68226aa3a1b", "measure_id": "CA225", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Stockholders' Liability", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.40000153, "percent_no": 43.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 246, "fingerprint": "1928|CA224|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA224|Statewide", "content_hash": "2fdfd8da930bfc0d", "measure_id": "CA224", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Reapportionment of Legislative Districts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.79999924, "percent_no": 45.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would reapportion California's legislative districts to r...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would reapportion California's legislative districts to reflect changes in population distribution since the previous apportionment. The measure aimed to adjust the boundaries and representation of state legislative districts based on updated demographic data.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 245, "fingerprint": "1928|CA223|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA223|Statewide", "content_hash": "969b4c70160a9b57", "measure_id": "CA223", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Authorizing State And Political Subdivisions to Hold Stock in Mutual Water Corporations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.40000153, "percent_no": 52.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state of California and its political ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state of California and its political subdivisions to purchase and hold stock in mutual water corporations. The proposal aimed to allow government entities to participate as shareholders in these water companies alongside private investors.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 244, "fingerprint": "1928|CA222|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA222|Statewide", "content_hash": "d9d6edb9c9522546", "measure_id": "CA222", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Education", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.59999847, "percent_no": 56.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 243, "fingerprint": "1928|CA221|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA221|Statewide", "content_hash": "3991639d8e878028", "measure_id": "CA221", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Grade Separation Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.79999924, "percent_no": 61.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 242, "fingerprint": "1928|CA220|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA220|Statewide", "content_hash": "7aa5279780aa39d9", "measure_id": "CA220", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Prohibiting Certain Acts with Animals and Use of Certain Instruments to Control Them", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.90000153, "percent_no": 63.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited certain unspecified acts with animals and ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited certain unspecified acts with animals and banned the use of certain unspecified instruments to control them. The ballot text does not provide details about which specific acts or instruments would be prohibited.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 241, "fingerprint": "1928|CA219|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1928|CA219|Statewide", "content_hash": "5fc14ba49b85ce9f", "measure_id": "CA219", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1928, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Boxing and Wrestling Contests", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.70000076, "percent_no": 63.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201928", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1928)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201928", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 240, "fingerprint": "1926|CA218|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA218|Statewide", "content_hash": "6fa8b8d70209baca", "measure_id": "CA218", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Taxing Highway Transportation Companies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 78.0, "percent_no": 22.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to impose taxes on highway transportation c...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to impose taxes on highway transportation companies operating in California. It gave the legislature the power to tax commercial vehicles and trucking businesses that used public roads for transportation services.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 239, "fingerprint": "1926|CA217|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA217|Statewide", "content_hash": "b442bdfe840d9c9f", "measure_id": "CA217", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Veterans' Welfare Bond Act of 1925", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 76.30000305, "percent_no": 23.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund welfare and assistan...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund welfare and assistance programs for military veterans. The bonds would provide financing for veteran services and support programs through the Veterans' Welfare Bond Act of 1925.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 238, "fingerprint": "1926|CA216|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA216|Statewide", "content_hash": "366c11ac1745f9ad", "measure_id": "CA216", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Election at Primary", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.80000305, "percent_no": 26.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 237, "fingerprint": "1926|CA215|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA215|Statewide", "content_hash": "52631663c48abac2", "measure_id": "CA215", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Taxation of Short Line Steam Railroads", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 73.19999695, "percent_no": 26.80000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure addressed the taxation system for short line steam railroads in ...", "summary_text": "This measure addressed the taxation system for short line steam railroads in California. It passed with 73.2% voter approval in 1926.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 236, "fingerprint": "1926|CA214|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA214|Statewide", "content_hash": "c2e63f97414edf00", "measure_id": "CA214", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 26", "description": "Giving Appellate Courts Trial Court Powers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.40000153, "percent_no": 30.599998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure gave California's appellate courts the authority to exercise tri...", "summary_text": "This measure gave California's appellate courts the authority to exercise trial court powers in certain cases. It expanded the jurisdiction of appellate courts beyond their traditional role of reviewing lower court decisions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 26", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2026%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_26_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2026%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 235, "fingerprint": "1926|CA213|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA213|Statewide", "content_hash": "45cbb54e44a861a6", "measure_id": "CA213", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Exempting Forest Trees from Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 69.09999847, "percent_no": 30.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure exempted forest trees from taxation in California", "summary_text": "This measure exempted forest trees from taxation in California. It was designed to encourage forest conservation and timber production by removing the tax burden on standing trees.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 234, "fingerprint": "1926|CA212|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA212|Statewide", "content_hash": "0b4b082ce91329a4", "measure_id": "CA212", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Bonds for State Buildings and University Buildings", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.59999847, "percent_no": 32.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the issuance of state bonds to finance the constructi...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the issuance of state bonds to finance the construction of government buildings and university facilities. The bonds would have been repaid through future state revenues.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 233, "fingerprint": "1926|CA211|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA211|Statewide", "content_hash": "2dd421ee10ee612f", "measure_id": "CA211", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 25", "description": "Taxation and Local Assessment Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.90000153, "percent_no": 35.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1926 California ballot measure created or modified exemptions from taxat...", "summary_text": "This 1926 California ballot measure created or modified exemptions from taxation and local assessments for certain properties or entities. The measure passed with nearly 65% voter approval, establishing these tax exemptions in state law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 25", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2025%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_25_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2025%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 232, "fingerprint": "1926|CA210|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA210|Statewide", "content_hash": "42988cbd365fcccb", "measure_id": "CA210", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 27", "description": "Judicial Council", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.69999695, "percent_no": 35.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 27", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2027%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_27_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2027%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 231, "fingerprint": "1926|CA209|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA209|Statewide", "content_hash": "045ebe1854240802", "measure_id": "CA209", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Suffrage", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.09999847, "percent_no": 35.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 230, "fingerprint": "1926|CA208|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA208|Statewide", "content_hash": "5c5144f4712d737e", "measure_id": "CA208", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "School Districts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.90000153, "percent_no": 43.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 229, "fingerprint": "1926|CA207|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA207|Statewide", "content_hash": "7aaa041fac4b12be", "measure_id": "CA207", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Corporations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.29999924, "percent_no": 44.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 228, "fingerprint": "1926|CA206|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA206|Statewide", "content_hash": "b7909a9e1d4f5c97", "measure_id": "CA206", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 28", "description": "Legislative Reapportionment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.59999847, "percent_no": 45.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 28", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2028%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_28_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2028%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 227, "fingerprint": "1926|CA205|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA205|Statewide", "content_hash": "62dc8e52efe3bad6", "measure_id": "CA205", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Political Subdivisions Incurring Indebtedness", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.70000076, "percent_no": 47.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required political subdivisions in California to obtain voter ap...", "summary_text": "This measure required political subdivisions in California to obtain voter approval before incurring certain types of debt or issuing bonds. It established constitutional restrictions on how local governments could take on financial obligations without direct consent from their constituents.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 226, "fingerprint": "1926|CA204|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA204|Statewide", "content_hash": "463517ebebfb5403", "measure_id": "CA204", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 24", "description": "Irritation Districts and Transfer of Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.40000153, "percent_no": 47.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized irrigation districts to transfer funds between differ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized irrigation districts to transfer funds between different categories of district finances and operations. It expanded the financial flexibility of irrigation districts in managing their budgets and expenditures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 24", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 225, "fingerprint": "1926|CA203|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA203|Statewide", "content_hash": "b528d4411a2d5de0", "measure_id": "CA203", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Tax Exemption for Veterans and Others", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.70000076, "percent_no": 49.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure exempted certain veterans and their surviving spouses from prope...", "summary_text": "This measure exempted certain veterans and their surviving spouses from property taxes on their homes, extending tax relief to those who served in the military. The measure passed with 50.7% of the vote in 1926.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 224, "fingerprint": "1926|CA202|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA202|Statewide", "content_hash": "f6f9deff6b28a93f", "measure_id": "CA202", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Salaries of Judges", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.79999924, "percent_no": 50.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 223, "fingerprint": "1926|CA201|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA201|Statewide", "content_hash": "562baf034b6e0e22", "measure_id": "CA201", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Gasoline Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.09999847, "percent_no": 51.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 222, "fingerprint": "1926|CA200|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA200|Statewide", "content_hash": "c40aafa1116d7757", "measure_id": "CA200", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Repeal of Wright Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.0, "percent_no": 53.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 221, "fingerprint": "1926|CA199|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA199|Statewide", "content_hash": "14a5c4ef6aa6bc0c", "measure_id": "CA199", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Requiring Bible in Schools", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.40000153, "percent_no": 56.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 220, "fingerprint": "1926|CA198|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA198|Statewide", "content_hash": "8e65d79feac2e079", "measure_id": "CA198", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Salaries of State Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.40000153, "percent_no": 60.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 219, "fingerprint": "1926|CA197|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA197|Statewide", "content_hash": "c2510a587565ceac", "measure_id": "CA197", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Reapportionment Commission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 39.29999924, "percent_no": 60.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Redistricting | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 218, "fingerprint": "1926|CA196|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA196|Statewide", "content_hash": "768b53723e1de626", "measure_id": "CA196", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Exempting Secondary Schools from Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.90000153, "percent_no": 64.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have exempted secondary schools from taxation in California", "summary_text": "This measure would have exempted secondary schools from taxation in California. The ballot failed with only 35.9% of voters supporting the tax exemption for these educational institutions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 217, "fingerprint": "1926|CA195|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA195|Statewide", "content_hash": "246d71f1e776d606", "measure_id": "CA195", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "State Highways", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.59999847, "percent_no": 64.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 216, "fingerprint": "1926|CA194|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA194|Statewide", "content_hash": "12dbba6d6dfacc4f", "measure_id": "CA194", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Racing", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.40000153, "percent_no": 64.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Gambling & Lotteries | Military & Veterans Affairs | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 215, "fingerprint": "1926|CA193|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA193|Statewide", "content_hash": "cf701b0539dca0bf", "measure_id": "CA193", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Pensioning Judges", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.10000038, "percent_no": 68.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 214, "fingerprint": "1926|CA192|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA192|Statewide", "content_hash": "1ffec0966eda15f2", "measure_id": "CA192", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Oleomargarine", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.70000076, "percent_no": 72.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 213, "fingerprint": "1926|CA191|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1926|CA191|Statewide", "content_hash": "b702a478bb8b3999", "measure_id": "CA191", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1926, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Water and Power", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.39999962, "percent_no": 72.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Energy & Electric Utilities | Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201926", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1926)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201926", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 212, "fingerprint": "1924|CA190|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA190|Statewide", "content_hash": "017fe636d5026872", "measure_id": "CA190", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Suffrage", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 78.09999847, "percent_no": 21.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 211, "fingerprint": "1924|CA189|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA189|Statewide", "content_hash": "10f5534f2b984fde", "measure_id": "CA189", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Inferior Courts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.09999847, "percent_no": 33.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 210, "fingerprint": "1924|CA188|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA188|Statewide", "content_hash": "d34da1be04d9c8f3", "measure_id": "CA188", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Deposit of Public Moneys", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.80000305, "percent_no": 35.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 209, "fingerprint": "1924|CA187|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA187|Statewide", "content_hash": "097f1de8635243cd", "measure_id": "CA187", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Municipal Courts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.90000153, "percent_no": 36.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 208, "fingerprint": "1924|CA186|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA186|Statewide", "content_hash": "ffd2333aad94ab2f", "measure_id": "CA186", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Eminent Domain", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.5, "percent_no": 37.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 207, "fingerprint": "1924|CA185|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA185|Statewide", "content_hash": "e0cf34ae75101917", "measure_id": "CA185", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Klamath River Fish and Game District", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.70000076, "percent_no": 39.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established the Klamath River Fish and Game District in Californ...", "summary_text": "This measure established the Klamath River Fish and Game District in California in 1924. The district was created to manage and protect fish and wildlife resources in the Klamath River region.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 206, "fingerprint": "1924|CA184|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA184|Statewide", "content_hash": "c6151304e33b6be8", "measure_id": "CA184", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Personal Property Taxes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.59999847, "percent_no": 40.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 205, "fingerprint": "1924|CA183|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA183|Statewide", "content_hash": "6f225893283c2e63", "measure_id": "CA183", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Salaries and Expense of Legislature", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.40000153, "percent_no": 44.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure established specific salary limits and expense allowances for Ca...", "summary_text": "This measure established specific salary limits and expense allowances for California state legislators, regulating their compensation structure. It passed with 55.4% voter approval in 1924.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 204, "fingerprint": "1924|CA182|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA182|Statewide", "content_hash": "88a1a6aaed0a7b53", "measure_id": "CA182", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.79999924, "percent_no": 46.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 203, "fingerprint": "1924|CA181|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA181|Statewide", "content_hash": "a6cd7f576ce73541", "measure_id": "CA181", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "County Officers", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.0, "percent_no": 48.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 202, "fingerprint": "1924|CA180|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA180|Statewide", "content_hash": "670219666558c2f7", "measure_id": "CA180", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Boxing and Wrestling Contests", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.0, "percent_no": 49.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 201, "fingerprint": "1924|CA179|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA179|Statewide", "content_hash": "5d0ad47760888be8", "measure_id": "CA179", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Poll Taxes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.79999924, "percent_no": 49.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 200, "fingerprint": "1924|CA178|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA178|Statewide", "content_hash": "09ca38b2fababe1f", "measure_id": "CA178", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "State Taxation of Highway Transportation Companies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.79999924, "percent_no": 54.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1924 California ballot measure would have established a state tax system...", "summary_text": "This 1924 California ballot measure would have established a state tax system specifically targeting highway transportation companies. The measure failed with 45.8% voter support.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 199, "fingerprint": "1924|CA177|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA177|Statewide", "content_hash": "aec80e4ad4297e21", "measure_id": "CA177", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.09999847, "percent_no": 61.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 198, "fingerprint": "1924|CA176|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA176|Statewide", "content_hash": "a278a64b3517dec6", "measure_id": "CA176", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "State Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.09999847, "percent_no": 62.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 197, "fingerprint": "1924|CA175|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA175|Statewide", "content_hash": "bfa1aa0049c8cab8", "measure_id": "CA175", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Tax Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.79999924, "percent_no": 64.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 196, "fingerprint": "1924|CA174|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA174|Statewide", "content_hash": "0acf59f6dbec9fce", "measure_id": "CA174", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Transfer of Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.89999962, "percent_no": 68.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 195, "fingerprint": "1924|CA173|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1924|CA173|Statewide", "content_hash": "190b590f72a1c021", "measure_id": "CA173", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1924, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Water and Power", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 29.89999962, "percent_no": 70.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Energy & Electric Utilities | Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201924", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1924)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201924", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 194, "fingerprint": "1922|CA172|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA172|Statewide", "content_hash": "af26c7997d475edd", "measure_id": "CA172", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Veterans' Validating Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.30000305, "percent_no": 28.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 193, "fingerprint": "1922|CA171|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA171|Statewide", "content_hash": "265cac8a446286c4", "measure_id": "CA171", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "State Budget", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 71.09999847, "percent_no": 28.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 192, "fingerprint": "1922|CA170|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA170|Statewide", "content_hash": "52d211af4379be63", "measure_id": "CA170", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Veterans' Welfare Bond Act of 1921", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.5, "percent_no": 31.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Military & Veterans Affairs\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund welfare programs and...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund welfare programs and benefits for military veterans. The bonds would be repaid through state revenues over time to finance veteran assistance programs established by the 1921 Veterans' Welfare Bond Act.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 191, "fingerprint": "1922|CA169|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA169|Statewide", "content_hash": "0fe3eefe96d25ef5", "measure_id": "CA169", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Municipalities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.40000153, "percent_no": 33.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 190, "fingerprint": "1922|CA168|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA168|Statewide", "content_hash": "47b67881ab28dfca", "measure_id": "CA168", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 26", "description": "School Districts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.90000153, "percent_no": 35.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 26", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2026%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_26_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2026%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 189, "fingerprint": "1922|CA167|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA167|Statewide", "content_hash": "6a1e866e5ae98d5b", "measure_id": "CA167", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Chiropractic", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.5, "percent_no": 40.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 188, "fingerprint": "1922|CA166|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA166|Statewide", "content_hash": "317f321985894e93", "measure_id": "CA166", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Deposit of Public Moneys", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.20000076, "percent_no": 40.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 187, "fingerprint": "1922|CA165|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA165|Statewide", "content_hash": "3ddba4e79b6be0c6", "measure_id": "CA165", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Osteopathic Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.29999924, "percent_no": 42.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 186, "fingerprint": "1922|CA164|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA164|Statewide", "content_hash": "6fb8173a3dde81d3", "measure_id": "CA164", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 25", "description": "Judges Pro Tempore", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.79999924, "percent_no": 43.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 25", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2025%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_25_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2025%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 185, "fingerprint": "1922|CA163|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA163|Statewide", "content_hash": "46b697b3d6953a77", "measure_id": "CA163", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Municipal Charters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.70000076, "percent_no": 45.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 184, "fingerprint": "1922|CA162|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA162|Statewide", "content_hash": "3123ffa38cb46ab2", "measure_id": "CA162", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Prohibition Enforcement Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.0, "percent_no": 48.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Civil & Constitutional Law | Criminal Justice | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 183, "fingerprint": "1922|CA161|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA161|Statewide", "content_hash": "9087856931fc26fb", "measure_id": "CA161", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Exempting Veterans from Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.59999847, "percent_no": 48.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure exempted military veterans from certain state and local taxes in...", "summary_text": "This measure exempted military veterans from certain state and local taxes in California. It provided tax relief specifically for individuals who had served in the armed forces.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 182, "fingerprint": "1922|CA160|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA160|Statewide", "content_hash": "8f2e637f21f95631", "measure_id": "CA160", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Absent Voters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.90000153, "percent_no": 49.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 181, "fingerprint": "1922|CA159|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA159|Statewide", "content_hash": "5fbc677f0c5eff6c", "measure_id": "CA159", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Municipal Public Works", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.90000153, "percent_no": 50.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 180, "fingerprint": "1922|CA158|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA158|Statewide", "content_hash": "bbcdc212a77e564f", "measure_id": "CA158", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Land Settlement Bond Act of 1921", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.20000076, "percent_no": 50.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance land s...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the state to issue bonds to finance land settlement programs, likely involving the purchase and development of land for agricultural or residential purposes. The bonds would have been repaid through future state revenues or assessments on the developed properties.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 179, "fingerprint": "1922|CA157|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA157|Statewide", "content_hash": "873d32c7ad9fe66b", "measure_id": "CA157", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Use of Streams", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.20000076, "percent_no": 55.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 178, "fingerprint": "1922|CA156|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA156|Statewide", "content_hash": "1a3a55a5687042c9", "measure_id": "CA156", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Judges' Salaries", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.70000076, "percent_no": 56.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 177, "fingerprint": "1922|CA155|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA155|Statewide", "content_hash": "d07990352f1c044a", "measure_id": "CA155", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Local Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.40000153, "percent_no": 58.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 176, "fingerprint": "1922|CA154|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA154|Statewide", "content_hash": "4b0cd89c98fe5179", "measure_id": "CA154", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 27", "description": "Initiative", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.5, "percent_no": 59.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 27", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2027%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_27_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2027%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 175, "fingerprint": "1922|CA153|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA153|Statewide", "content_hash": "c6ea78c0634e93ba", "measure_id": "CA153", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Taxation of Publicly Owned Public Utilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.59999847, "percent_no": 62.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required publicly owned utilities in California to pa...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required publicly owned utilities in California to pay taxes to the state and local governments. The taxation would have applied to municipal and other government-owned utility companies that were previously exempt from such tax obligations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 174, "fingerprint": "1922|CA152|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA152|Statewide", "content_hash": "03750b98ca77f02a", "measure_id": "CA152", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Prohibiting Special Laws", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.40000153, "percent_no": 63.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 173, "fingerprint": "1922|CA151|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA151|Statewide", "content_hash": "9c153a2ec6104321", "measure_id": "CA151", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Regulation of Publicly Owned Public Utilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.79999924, "percent_no": 64.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have regulated publicly owned public utilities in Californ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have regulated publicly owned public utilities in California, establishing state oversight and regulatory framework for utility services operated by government entities. The specific regulatory mechanisms and requirements that would have been implemented are not detailed in the available ballot text.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 172, "fingerprint": "1922|CA150|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA150|Statewide", "content_hash": "f8a7bc307849f1cc", "measure_id": "CA150", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Title Insurance", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 35.40000153, "percent_no": 64.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 171, "fingerprint": "1922|CA149|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA149|Statewide", "content_hash": "fe64922ac890fb57", "measure_id": "CA149", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "State Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 33.59999847, "percent_no": 66.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 170, "fingerprint": "1922|CA148|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA148|Statewide", "content_hash": "1c4fc930fbcd8e67", "measure_id": "CA148", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 28", "description": "Prohibiting Vivisection", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.5, "percent_no": 69.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Civil & Constitutional Law | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 28", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2028%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_28_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2028%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 169, "fingerprint": "1922|CA147|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA147|Statewide", "content_hash": "c8fccd3b9dea3fdd", "measure_id": "CA147", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Water and Power", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 29.0, "percent_no": 71.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Energy & Electric Utilities | Local Government | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 168, "fingerprint": "1922|CA146|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA146|Statewide", "content_hash": "2c1560a9f6c32ee8", "measure_id": "CA146", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 24", "description": "Regulating Practice of Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 26.29999924, "percent_no": 73.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 24", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 167, "fingerprint": "1922|CA145|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA145|Statewide", "content_hash": "d1afe6f81d8c9382", "measure_id": "CA145", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 30", "description": "Franchises", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 21.39999962, "percent_no": 78.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 30", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2030%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_30_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2030%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 166, "fingerprint": "1922|CA144|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA144|Statewide", "content_hash": "152fb36a4cd65208", "measure_id": "CA144", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 29", "description": "Land Franchise Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 19.39999962, "percent_no": 80.60000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 29", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2029%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_29_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2029%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 165, "fingerprint": "1922|CA143|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1922|CA143|Statewide", "content_hash": "1ec179c65ade9725", "measure_id": "CA143", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1922, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "State Housing Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 15.60000038, "percent_no": 84.39999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201922", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1922)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201922", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 164, "fingerprint": "1920|CA142|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA142|Statewide", "content_hash": "3d234e2f864fdc4e", "measure_id": "CA142", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Alien Poll Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 81.90000153, "percent_no": 18.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 163, "fingerprint": "1920|CA141|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA141|Statewide", "content_hash": "234449f6ecbaa3c5", "measure_id": "CA141", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Alien Land Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 75.09999847, "percent_no": 24.900001529999997, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 162, "fingerprint": "1920|CA140|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA140|Statewide", "content_hash": "865acd527c259d97", "measure_id": "CA140", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "State Aid to Institutions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 68.69999695, "percent_no": 31.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Human Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 161, "fingerprint": "1920|CA139|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA139|Statewide", "content_hash": "709ee00407bad627", "measure_id": "CA139", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "School System", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.30000305, "percent_no": 34.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 160, "fingerprint": "1920|CA138|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA138|Statewide", "content_hash": "59ac1612e2bef5eb", "measure_id": "CA138", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Poison Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.90000153, "percent_no": 36.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 159, "fingerprint": "1920|CA137|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA137|Statewide", "content_hash": "34f73a301b6b3a5c", "measure_id": "CA137", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Highway Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 58.29999924, "percent_no": 41.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 158, "fingerprint": "1920|CA136|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA136|Statewide", "content_hash": "fc69a3852dffeb65", "measure_id": "CA136", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Irrigation District Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.79999924, "percent_no": 47.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 157, "fingerprint": "1920|CA135|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA135|Statewide", "content_hash": "9d7fa4c4368269b2", "measure_id": "CA135", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Exempting Orphanages from Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.5, "percent_no": 48.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure exempted orphanages from taxation in California", "summary_text": "This measure exempted orphanages from taxation in California. The ballot measure passed in 1920 with 51.5% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 156, "fingerprint": "1920|CA134|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA134|Statewide", "content_hash": "440f9cacd0b3fe97", "measure_id": "CA134", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "State University Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.70000076, "percent_no": 50.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: Higher Ed | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 155, "fingerprint": "1920|CA133|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA133|Statewide", "content_hash": "b9e72def872d4731", "measure_id": "CA133", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Chiropractic", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.20000076, "percent_no": 50.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 154, "fingerprint": "1920|CA132|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA132|Statewide", "content_hash": "9c84cec263b175b6", "measure_id": "CA132", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Absent Voters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.0, "percent_no": 51.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 153, "fingerprint": "1920|CA131|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA131|Statewide", "content_hash": "bfbcaa7d3407489a", "measure_id": "CA131", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Insurance Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.40000153, "percent_no": 51.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Insurance\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 152, "fingerprint": "1920|CA130|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA130|Statewide", "content_hash": "3123ffa38cb46ab2", "measure_id": "CA130", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Prohibition Enforcement Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.20000076, "percent_no": 53.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 151, "fingerprint": "1920|CA129|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA129|Statewide", "content_hash": "d2619ab7bba0c3bf", "measure_id": "CA129", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Prohibiting Compulsory Vaccination", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.40000153, "percent_no": 56.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have prohibited the state and local governments from requi...", "summary_text": "This measure would have prohibited the state and local governments from requiring vaccinations as a condition of attending school or for other purposes. The measure failed, allowing California to continue maintaining compulsory vaccination requirements.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 150, "fingerprint": "1920|CA128|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA128|Statewide", "content_hash": "dd629a6d5d6bfe7e", "measure_id": "CA128", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Initiative", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.40000153, "percent_no": 58.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 149, "fingerprint": "1920|CA127|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA127|Statewide", "content_hash": "7111152802531288", "measure_id": "CA127", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Prohibiting Vivisection", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.09999847, "percent_no": 65.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 148, "fingerprint": "1920|CA126|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA126|Statewide", "content_hash": "58b6fac192ab8b2a", "measure_id": "CA126", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Constitutional Convention", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.20000076, "percent_no": 67.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 147, "fingerprint": "1920|CA125|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA125|Statewide", "content_hash": "f250d2e44bce4a9c", "measure_id": "CA125", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Community Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.0, "percent_no": 68.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 146, "fingerprint": "1920|CA124|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA124|Statewide", "content_hash": "b60c1074b90fbe84", "measure_id": "CA124", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Salaries of Justices", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.10000038, "percent_no": 69.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 145, "fingerprint": "1920|CA123|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1920|CA123|Statewide", "content_hash": "f1e8ad92f07a35e4", "measure_id": "CA123", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1920, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Land Values Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 25.89999962, "percent_no": 74.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1920, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201920", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1920)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201920", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 144, "fingerprint": "1919|CA122|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1919|CA122|Statewide", "content_hash": "2482cf8c052dc244", "measure_id": "CA122", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1919, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "State Highway Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 87.5, "percent_no": 12.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201919", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1919)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201919", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 143, "fingerprint": "1918|CA121|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA121|Statewide", "content_hash": "8d1306d326d0c580", "measure_id": "CA121", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "University of California. Competitive Bidding. Grounds for Denial of Admission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 62.79999924, "percent_no": 37.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Education: Higher Ed | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure required the University of California to use competitive bidding...", "summary_text": "This measure required the University of California to use competitive bidding for contracts and established specific grounds under which the university could deny admission to prospective students. The measure passed with 62.8% voter approval in 1918.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 142, "fingerprint": "1918|CA120|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA120|Statewide", "content_hash": "0a68359cf180aa5c", "measure_id": "CA120", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Deposit of Public Moneys", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.90000153, "percent_no": 43.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 141, "fingerprint": "1918|CA119|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA119|Statewide", "content_hash": "a4ac85b7a825fddd", "measure_id": "CA119", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Condemnation of Right of Way for Public Use", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.09999847, "percent_no": 45.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to use eminent domain to condemn private pr...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to use eminent domain to condemn private property for public right-of-way purposes. It passed in 1918, giving California expanded powers to acquire land needed for public infrastructure projects.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 140, "fingerprint": "1918|CA118|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA118|Statewide", "content_hash": "9b4aab0df19ce8b4", "measure_id": "CA118", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "City of Venice Indebtedness", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.90000153, "percent_no": 47.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 139, "fingerprint": "1918|CA117|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA117|Statewide", "content_hash": "b71b367393cd7832", "measure_id": "CA117", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Appellate Court Divisions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.59999847, "percent_no": 47.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 138, "fingerprint": "1918|CA116|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA116|Statewide", "content_hash": "02230cebe7f236d4", "measure_id": "CA116", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Usury Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.09999847, "percent_no": 47.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 137, "fingerprint": "1918|CA115|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA115|Statewide", "content_hash": "cb5c8e9050492465", "measure_id": "CA115", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Organization of County Within Consolidated City and County Government", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.59999847, "percent_no": 48.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed for the organization of counties within consolidated cit...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed for the organization of counties within consolidated city and county governments in California. It established the legal framework for creating unified municipal-county administrative structures.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 136, "fingerprint": "1918|CA114|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA114|Statewide", "content_hash": "186a1f5cf36c7b45", "measure_id": "CA114", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Borough Government Permanency", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 51.09999847, "percent_no": 48.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 135, "fingerprint": "1918|CA113|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA113|Statewide", "content_hash": "1a4680ade75ecc63", "measure_id": "CA113", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Los Angeles County Funds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.70000076, "percent_no": 49.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 134, "fingerprint": "1918|CA112|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA112|Statewide", "content_hash": "8fb2a8efc57dbf5c", "measure_id": "CA112", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Workmen's Compensation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.59999847, "percent_no": 49.40000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 133, "fingerprint": "1918|CA111|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA111|Statewide", "content_hash": "b7713e035c437bfe", "measure_id": "CA111", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 24", "description": "Stockholders Liability", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.5, "percent_no": 52.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 24", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 132, "fingerprint": "1918|CA110|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA110|Statewide", "content_hash": "ff77945e7abf5b18", "measure_id": "CA110", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Prohibition", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.40000153, "percent_no": 52.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 131, "fingerprint": "1918|CA109|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA109|Statewide", "content_hash": "018d088e8b404c06", "measure_id": "CA109", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Liquor Regulation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.90000153, "percent_no": 57.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 130, "fingerprint": "1918|CA108|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA108|Statewide", "content_hash": "1cf2ad21cc1c0dec", "measure_id": "CA108", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Absent Voters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.90000153, "percent_no": 57.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 129, "fingerprint": "1918|CA107|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA107|Statewide", "content_hash": "d70983a48b767d28", "measure_id": "CA107", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "County and School Tax Limitations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.29999924, "percent_no": 57.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have limited the tax rates that counties and school distri...", "summary_text": "This measure would have limited the tax rates that counties and school districts could impose on property, establishing maximum rates for different types of local government taxation. The measure aimed to cap property tax levels at the county and school district level through constitutional restrictions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 128, "fingerprint": "1918|CA106|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA106|Statewide", "content_hash": "fd0577c08402bf9e", "measure_id": "CA106", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Dentistry", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.90000153, "percent_no": 61.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 127, "fingerprint": "1918|CA105|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA105|Statewide", "content_hash": "227aad191dffa5ff", "measure_id": "CA105", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 25", "description": "Eminent Domain", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.70000076, "percent_no": 62.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 25", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2025%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_25_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2025%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 126, "fingerprint": "1918|CA104|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA104|Statewide", "content_hash": "19617cd3940a85e5", "measure_id": "CA104", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Taxation Exemptions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.40000153, "percent_no": 63.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Human Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 125, "fingerprint": "1918|CA103|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA103|Statewide", "content_hash": "9f2b0a3ae6a672f4", "measure_id": "CA103", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Exempting Cemeteries from Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.0, "percent_no": 64.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have exempted cemeteries from property taxation in California", "summary_text": "This measure would have exempted cemeteries from property taxation in California. The proposal failed with 36% voter support in 1918.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 124, "fingerprint": "1918|CA102|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA102|Statewide", "content_hash": "96e1b1e42b282aec", "measure_id": "CA102", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Tax Levy Limitations", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 33.0, "percent_no": 67.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 123, "fingerprint": "1918|CA101|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA101|Statewide", "content_hash": "4ed8f7e9882058d6", "measure_id": "CA101", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Reimbursing Cities for Revenue Losses from Taxation Exemptions for Military Service", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 30.60000038, "percent_no": 69.39999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have required the state to reimburse cities for tax revenu...", "summary_text": "This measure would have required the state to reimburse cities for tax revenue losses resulting from tax exemptions granted to individuals for military service. The proposition aimed to compensate local governments for the fiscal impact of state-mandated military service tax breaks.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 122, "fingerprint": "1918|CA100|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA100|Statewide", "content_hash": "c8d08445f50744a2", "measure_id": "CA100", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Health Insurance", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.20000076, "percent_no": 72.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health | Human Services | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 121, "fingerprint": "1918|CA99|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA99|Statewide", "content_hash": "c458dc6ec9079ad9", "measure_id": "CA99", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "State Budget Board", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 27.0, "percent_no": 73.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Budgets | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 120, "fingerprint": "1918|CA98|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA98|Statewide", "content_hash": "a1cac669dbe44de7", "measure_id": "CA98", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Land Values Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 24.70000076, "percent_no": 75.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 119, "fingerprint": "1918|CA97|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1918|CA97|Statewide", "content_hash": "e0240956b10f38aa", "measure_id": "CA97", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1918, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Courts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 23.89999962, "percent_no": 76.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201918", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1918)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201918", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 118, "fingerprint": "1916|CA96|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1916|CA96|Statewide", "content_hash": "2cd7a2ef6f6ca8e8", "measure_id": "CA96", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1916, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "State Highway Act of 1915", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 79.80000305, "percent_no": 20.19999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201916", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1916)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201916", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 117, "fingerprint": "1916|CA95|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1916|CA95|Statewide", "content_hash": "59dfac4e928d3803", "measure_id": "CA95", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1916, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Amendment to the State Highway Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 76.0, "percent_no": 24.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure amended the State Highway Act, though the specific changes are n...", "summary_text": "This measure amended the State Highway Act, though the specific changes are not detailed in the provided ballot text. The amendment passed with 76% voter approval in 1916.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201916", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1916)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201916", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 116, "fingerprint": "1916|CA94|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1916|CA94|Statewide", "content_hash": "eb0fefe657bea5b7", "measure_id": "CA94", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1916, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Ineligibility to Office", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 64.30000305, "percent_no": 35.69999695, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201916", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1916)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201916", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 115, "fingerprint": "1916|CA93|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1916|CA93|Statewide", "content_hash": "00f6ab7611c1b317", "measure_id": "CA93", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1916, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Prohibition", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.70000076, "percent_no": 52.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201916", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1916)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201916", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 114, "fingerprint": "1916|CA92|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1916|CA92|Statewide", "content_hash": "09445c0daeacc630", "measure_id": "CA92", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1916, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Direct Primary Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.70000076, "percent_no": 52.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201916", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1916)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201916", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 113, "fingerprint": "1916|CA91|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1916|CA91|Statewide", "content_hash": "aa6756afc72c3368", "measure_id": "CA91", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1916, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Prohibition", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.79999924, "percent_no": 55.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201916", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1916)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201916", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 112, "fingerprint": "1916|CA90|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1916|CA90|Statewide", "content_hash": "e2ddecfe4a546cd7", "measure_id": "CA90", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1916, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Land Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 31.10000038, "percent_no": 68.89999962, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201916", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1916)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201916", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 111, "fingerprint": "1915|CA89|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1915|CA89|Statewide", "content_hash": "309b3d9596c07a2e", "measure_id": "CA89", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1915, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Terms of Judges Filling Vacancies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would set the terms of office for judges appointed to fill vacan...", "summary_text": "This measure would set the terms of office for judges appointed to fill vacancies in California courts. It would establish how long appointed judges serve before facing election or reappointment.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201915", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1915)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201915", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 110, "fingerprint": "1915|CA88|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1915|CA88|Statewide", "content_hash": "1689767392804506", "measure_id": "CA88", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1915, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Initiative and Referendum", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.90000153, "percent_no": 50.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201915", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1915)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201915", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 109, "fingerprint": "1915|CA87|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1915|CA87|Statewide", "content_hash": "f56d12a7527fbf26", "measure_id": "CA87", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1915, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Rural Credits", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.79999924, "percent_no": 51.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201915", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1915)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201915", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 108, "fingerprint": "1915|CA86|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1915|CA86|Statewide", "content_hash": "055f186a43f03eac", "measure_id": "CA86", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1915, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Direct Primary Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.40000153, "percent_no": 51.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201915", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1915)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201915", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 107, "fingerprint": "1915|CA85|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1915|CA85|Statewide", "content_hash": "9f1f5728120783e1", "measure_id": "CA85", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1915, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Form of Ballot Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.79999924, "percent_no": 58.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201915", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1915)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201915", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 106, "fingerprint": "1915|CA84|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1915|CA84|Statewide", "content_hash": "c7054007226ac559", "measure_id": "CA84", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1915, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "County Charters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.29999924, "percent_no": 58.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201915", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1915)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201915", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 105, "fingerprint": "1915|CA83|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1915|CA83|Statewide", "content_hash": "943122f3e4f39296", "measure_id": "CA83", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1915, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Deposit of Public Moneys", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.5, "percent_no": 61.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201915", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1915)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201915", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 104, "fingerprint": "1915|CA82|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1915|CA82|Statewide", "content_hash": "988ae127b56f9d80", "measure_id": "CA82", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1915, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Condemnation for Public Purposes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.0, "percent_no": 62.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have expanded the state's power of eminent domain to allow...", "summary_text": "This measure would have expanded the state's power of eminent domain to allow condemnation of private property for broader public purposes beyond what was previously permitted. The amendment would have modified constitutional restrictions on when the government could seize private land for public use.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201915", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1915)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201915", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 103, "fingerprint": "1915|CA81|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1915|CA81|Statewide", "content_hash": "c6f674a30b3b72c8", "measure_id": "CA81", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1915, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Exempting Property from Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.09999847, "percent_no": 62.90000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1915 California ballot measure would have exempted certain property from...", "summary_text": "This 1915 California ballot measure would have exempted certain property from taxation, though the specific types of property and scope of the exemption are not detailed in the provided ballot text.", "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201915", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1915)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201915", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 102, "fingerprint": "1915|CA80|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1915|CA80|Statewide", "content_hash": "88a1a6aaed0a7b53", "measure_id": "CA80", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1915, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.0, "percent_no": 64.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201915", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1915)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201915", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 101, "fingerprint": "1915|CA79|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1915|CA79|Statewide", "content_hash": "412716524e631b20", "measure_id": "CA79", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1915, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Term of Superior Judges", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 17.0, "percent_no": 83.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "special", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201915", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1915)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201915", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 100, "fingerprint": "1914|CA78|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA78|Statewide", "content_hash": "4b7856cff16ee7a4", "measure_id": "CA78", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 48", "description": "San Francisco Harbor Improvement Act of 1913", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.90000153, "percent_no": 29.099998470000003, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure enacted the San Francisco Harbor Improvement Act of 1913,...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure enacted the San Francisco Harbor Improvement Act of 1913, which authorized improvements to San Francisco's harbor infrastructure. The measure passed with nearly 71% voter approval, implementing harbor development plans that had been established by the state legislature.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 48", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2048%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_48_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2048%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 99, "fingerprint": "1914|CA77|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA77|Statewide", "content_hash": "906a1660257a5357", "measure_id": "CA77", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 32", "description": "Election of United States Senators", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.90000153, "percent_no": 32.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would allow California voters to directly elect their United Sta...", "summary_text": "This measure would allow California voters to directly elect their United States Senators through popular vote rather than having them chosen by the state legislature. It implemented the requirements of the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which had been ratified in 1913.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 32", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2032%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_32_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2032%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 98, "fingerprint": "1914|CA76|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA76|Statewide", "content_hash": "94b8eea8336904f2", "measure_id": "CA76", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 41", "description": "Miscarriage of Justice", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 67.5, "percent_no": 32.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 41", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2041%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_41_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2041%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 97, "fingerprint": "1914|CA75|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA75|Statewide", "content_hash": "13cbc101eadca732", "measure_id": "CA75", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 39", "description": "Suspension of Prohibition Amendment", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.40000153, "percent_no": 33.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure suspended California's prohibition amendment that had banned the...", "summary_text": "This measure suspended California's prohibition amendment that had banned the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages. It allowed the state to permit alcohol sales again, effectively repealing the earlier prohibition law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 39", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2039%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_39_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2039%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 96, "fingerprint": "1914|CA74|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA74|Statewide", "content_hash": "6dfc1a077c52ea33", "measure_id": "CA74", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Exposition Contribution by Alameda County", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.90000153, "percent_no": 34.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized Alameda County to contribute funds to an exposition", "summary_text": "This measure authorized Alameda County to contribute funds to an exposition. The ballot measure passed with 65.9% of the vote in 1914.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 95, "fingerprint": "1914|CA73|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA73|Statewide", "content_hash": "55aa3893c89c0d50", "measure_id": "CA73", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 30", "description": "Irrigation Districts Controlling International Water Systems", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 65.40000153, "percent_no": 34.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1914 California ballot measure granted irrigation districts the authorit...", "summary_text": "This 1914 California ballot measure granted irrigation districts the authority to control and manage water systems that cross international boundaries. The measure passed with 65.4% voter approval, giving these districts expanded jurisdiction over transnational water resources.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 30", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2030%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_30_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2030%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 94, "fingerprint": "1914|CA72|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA72|Statewide", "content_hash": "7a23c318187a6e43", "measure_id": "CA72", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "University of California Building Bond Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 63.29999924, "percent_no": 36.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Education: Higher Ed\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1914 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fu...", "summary_text": "This 1914 California ballot measure authorized the state to issue bonds to fund construction projects at the University of California. The measure provided funding for new buildings and facilities to expand the university system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 93, "fingerprint": "1914|CA71|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA71|Statewide", "content_hash": "e4d12950c9a03903", "measure_id": "CA71", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Land Title Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.5, "percent_no": 38.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 92, "fingerprint": "1914|CA70|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA70|Statewide", "content_hash": "bc692e040538a8ef", "measure_id": "CA70", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 34", "description": "Taxation of Public Property", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 61.40000153, "percent_no": 38.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Natural Resources | State Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 34", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2034%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_34_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2034%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 91, "fingerprint": "1914|CA69|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA69|Statewide", "content_hash": "738eb33d4fa2858c", "measure_id": "CA69", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 26", "description": "Legislative Control of Irrigation, Reclamation and Drainage Districts", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 60.70000076, "percent_no": 39.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Legislatures | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure gave the California legislature authority to regulate and contro...", "summary_text": "This measure gave the California legislature authority to regulate and control irrigation, reclamation, and drainage districts throughout the state. It established legislative oversight over these water management districts that had previously operated with less state supervision.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 26", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2026%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_26_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2026%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 90, "fingerprint": "1914|CA68|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA68|Statewide", "content_hash": "16444d7fd4dea2bc", "measure_id": "CA68", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 42", "description": "Place of Payment of Bonds and Interest", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 59.70000076, "percent_no": 40.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure allowed California to designate places both within and outside t...", "summary_text": "This measure allowed California to designate places both within and outside the state where bond payments and interest could be made, rather than restricting payment locations to within California only. The change gave the state more flexibility in choosing convenient payment locations for bondholders.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 42", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2042%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_42_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2042%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 89, "fingerprint": "1914|CA67|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA67|Statewide", "content_hash": "469f7fe2a1944846", "measure_id": "CA67", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 29", "description": "Incorporation of Municipalities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 57.09999847, "percent_no": 42.90000153, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1914 California ballot measure established procedures and requirements f...", "summary_text": "This 1914 California ballot measure established procedures and requirements for the incorporation of new municipalities within the state. The measure provided a legal framework for communities to organize as cities or towns through a formal incorporation process.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 29", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2029%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_29_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2029%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 88, "fingerprint": "1914|CA66|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA66|Statewide", "content_hash": "5d3b854cd6e7ca6e", "measure_id": "CA66", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 44", "description": "Minimum Wage", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 56.20000076, "percent_no": 43.79999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 44", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2044%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_44_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2044%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 87, "fingerprint": "1914|CA65|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA65|Statewide", "content_hash": "cb8ca8a5030461d6", "measure_id": "CA65", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Prize Fights", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.79999924, "percent_no": 44.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Gambling & Lotteries\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 86, "fingerprint": "1914|CA64|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA64|Statewide", "content_hash": "73fbc81b2a5c6d57", "measure_id": "CA64", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 25", "description": "Adoption and Amendment of Municipal Charters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 55.70000076, "percent_no": 44.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1914 California ballot measure allowed municipalities to adopt and amend...", "summary_text": "This 1914 California ballot measure allowed municipalities to adopt and amend their own charters through local processes rather than requiring state legislative approval. The measure gave cities and towns greater autonomy in determining their governmental structure and operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 25", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2025%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_25_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2025%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 85, "fingerprint": "1914|CA63|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA63|Statewide", "content_hash": "f874c0f89809c4c7", "measure_id": "CA63", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 31", "description": "Valuation of Condemned Public Utilities by Railroad Commission", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.40000153, "percent_no": 45.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Land Use/Property Rights | Natural Resources\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the California Railroad Commission to determine the v...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the California Railroad Commission to determine the value of public utilities when they are condemned for public use. It gave the commission the power to establish valuation procedures and standards for utilities subject to condemnation proceedings.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 31", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2031%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_31_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2031%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 84, "fingerprint": "1914|CA62|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA62|Statewide", "content_hash": "3759c4761f629715", "measure_id": "CA62", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Investment Companies Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.40000153, "percent_no": 45.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 83, "fingerprint": "1914|CA61|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA61|Statewide", "content_hash": "6588bfff1651bff5", "measure_id": "CA61", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Exempting Vessels from Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 54.29999924, "percent_no": 45.70000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Tax & Revenue | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure exempted vessels from state and local taxation in California", "summary_text": "This measure exempted vessels from state and local taxation in California. It removed boats and ships from the property tax rolls that municipalities and counties could previously tax.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 82, "fingerprint": "1914|CA60|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA60|Statewide", "content_hash": "dc97cba8e0777082", "measure_id": "CA60", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 36", "description": "San Francisco State Building Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.90000153, "percent_no": 46.09999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the construction of state buildings in San Francisco ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the construction of state buildings in San Francisco to house various state government offices and departments. It provided for the funding and development of state-owned facilities in the city to serve governmental functions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 36", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2036%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_36_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2036%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 81, "fingerprint": "1914|CA59|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA59|Statewide", "content_hash": "9d0d6ab034ab3024", "measure_id": "CA59", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 27", "description": "County Charters", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.70000076, "percent_no": 46.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 27", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2027%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_27_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2027%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 80, "fingerprint": "1914|CA58|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA58|Statewide", "content_hash": "9cde0ca854bbaa7c", "measure_id": "CA58", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 43", "description": "Exempting Educational Institutions from Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 53.0, "percent_no": 47.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12 | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1914 California ballot measure exempted educational institutions from ta...", "summary_text": "This 1914 California ballot measure exempted educational institutions from taxation. The measure passed with 53.0% of the vote.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 43", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2043%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_43_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2043%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 79, "fingerprint": "1914|CA57|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA57|Statewide", "content_hash": "f1bb21e5436bc14c", "measure_id": "CA57", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 28", "description": "Regulation of Public Utilities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.79999924, "percent_no": 47.20000076, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 28", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2028%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_28_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2028%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 78, "fingerprint": "1914|CA56|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA56|Statewide", "content_hash": "ac13d9530902a468", "measure_id": "CA56", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 35", "description": "Sacramento State Building Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.40000153, "percent_no": 47.59999847, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the construction ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the state to issue bonds to finance the construction of state buildings in Sacramento. The bonds would have been repaid through state revenues over time.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 35", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2035%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_35_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2035%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 77, "fingerprint": "1914|CA55|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA55|Statewide", "content_hash": "178480e7e4b9b1a8", "measure_id": "CA55", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Abolition of Poll Tax", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 52.0, "percent_no": 48.0, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 76, "fingerprint": "1914|CA54|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA54|Statewide", "content_hash": "e8c4374b76aecc8d", "measure_id": "CA54", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Water Commission Act", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.70000076, "percent_no": 49.29999924, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Natural Resources | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 75, "fingerprint": "1914|CA53|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA53|Statewide", "content_hash": "f5c51d39775f6344", "measure_id": "CA53", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Consolidation of City and County, and Limited Annexation of Contiguous Territory", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 50.5, "percent_no": 49.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure authorized the consolidation of city and county governments and ...", "summary_text": "This measure authorized the consolidation of city and county governments and allowed for limited annexation of adjacent territory. It provided a legal framework for municipalities and counties to merge their governmental structures and expand boundaries under specified conditions.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 74, "fingerprint": "1914|CA52|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA52|Statewide", "content_hash": "1cafcb129e57f9a0", "measure_id": "CA52", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Constitutional Conventions", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.79999924, "percent_no": 50.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 73, "fingerprint": "1914|CA51|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA51|Statewide", "content_hash": "0059a7e4e2c5d0c8", "measure_id": "CA51", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Non-Sale of Game", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 49.40000153, "percent_no": 50.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Business & Commerce | Criminal Justice | Gambling & Lotteries\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 72, "fingerprint": "1914|CA50|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA50|Statewide", "content_hash": "49405355290a8360", "measure_id": "CA50", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Qualification of Voters at Bond Elections", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 48.0, "percent_no": 52.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed all registered voters to participate in bond ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed all registered voters to participate in bond elections, rather than restricting voting to property owners only. It sought to expand suffrage in municipal bond elections to include non-property-owning citizens.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 71, "fingerprint": "1914|CA49|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA49|Statewide", "content_hash": "e5b37fda175d8b3b", "measure_id": "CA49", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 38", "description": "Los Angeles State Building Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 47.20000076, "percent_no": 52.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the issuance of state bonds to fund the co...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the issuance of state bonds to fund the construction of state buildings in Los Angeles. The bonds would have provided financing for government facilities and infrastructure in the Los Angeles area.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 38", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2038%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_38_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2038%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 70, "fingerprint": "1914|CA48|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA48|Statewide", "content_hash": "1cc922f2d17ce121", "measure_id": "CA48", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 37", "description": "State Fair Grounds Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 46.29999924, "percent_no": 53.70000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Arts & Culture | Bond Measures | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 37", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Other", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2037%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_37_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2037%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 69, "fingerprint": "1914|CA47|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA47|Statewide", "content_hash": "15260aa392164109", "measure_id": "CA47", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Condemnation for Public Purposes", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.79999924, "percent_no": 54.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed the state and local governments to condemn pr...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed the state and local governments to condemn private property for public purposes through eminent domain proceedings. It would have established legal procedures for government acquisition of private land when deemed necessary for public use, with compensation to property owners.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 68, "fingerprint": "1914|CA46|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA46|Statewide", "content_hash": "bfce8c641cbed552", "measure_id": "CA46", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 33", "description": "Public Utilities in Municipalities", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.40000153, "percent_no": 54.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed municipalities in California to acquire, cons...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed municipalities in California to acquire, construct, and operate public utilities such as water, gas, and electric services. The measure sought to enable local governments to provide these essential services directly to residents rather than relying on private utility companies.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 33", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2033%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_33_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2033%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 67, "fingerprint": "1914|CA45|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA45|Statewide", "content_hash": "86a0cd44c8c3c818", "measure_id": "CA45", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Elections by Plurality, Preferential Vote and Primary", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 45.0, "percent_no": 55.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a preferential voting system for Californ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a preferential voting system for California elections, allowing voters to rank candidates in order of preference rather than selecting just one candidate. The system would have applied to both primary and general elections, with winners determined through ranked-choice tabulation rather than simple plurality.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 66, "fingerprint": "1914|CA44|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA44|Statewide", "content_hash": "e4325c2a108a33a8", "measure_id": "CA44", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 47", "description": "Prohibition Elections", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 44.90000153, "percent_no": 55.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 47", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2047%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_47_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2047%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 65, "fingerprint": "1914|CA43|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA43|Statewide", "content_hash": "5dabd958361b2956", "measure_id": "CA43", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "City and County Consolidation, and Annexation with Consent of Annexed Territory", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 43.79999924, "percent_no": 56.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed cities and counties to consolidate their gove...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed cities and counties to consolidate their governments and permitted annexation of territory only with the consent of the area being annexed. The proposal aimed to restructure local government boundaries and require approval from affected communities before territorial changes could occur.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 64, "fingerprint": "1914|CA42|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA42|Statewide", "content_hash": "e41fec84102de4a4", "measure_id": "CA42", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Deposit of Public Moneys", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 42.20000076, "percent_no": 57.79999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services | Budgets\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 63, "fingerprint": "1914|CA41|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA41|Statewide", "content_hash": "b18185ff50250d0e", "measure_id": "CA41", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Local Taxation Exemption", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.59999847, "percent_no": 58.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 62, "fingerprint": "1914|CA40|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA40|Statewide", "content_hash": "d0fcad5691ecced7", "measure_id": "CA40", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Regulating Investment Companies", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.40000153, "percent_no": 58.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Banking & Financial Services\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1914 California ballot measure would have established regulations for in...", "summary_text": "This 1914 California ballot measure would have established regulations for investment companies operating in the state. The measure failed with 41.4% of voters supporting it.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Taxes & Finance", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 61, "fingerprint": "1914|CA39|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA39|Statewide", "content_hash": "00f6ab7611c1b317", "measure_id": "CA39", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Prohibition", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 40.40000153, "percent_no": 59.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Drug/Alcohol/Tobacco Policy\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 60, "fingerprint": "1914|CA38|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA38|Statewide", "content_hash": "a69aca0b26186885", "measure_id": "CA38", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 45", "description": "One Day of Rest in Seven", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.79999924, "percent_no": 61.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 45", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2045%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_45_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2045%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 59, "fingerprint": "1914|CA37|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA37|Statewide", "content_hash": "46b7900ddc167cca", "measure_id": "CA37", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 40", "description": "Extra Sessions of District Courts of Appeal", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 38.70000076, "percent_no": 61.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have authorized the California Legislature to provide for ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have authorized the California Legislature to provide for extra sessions of the District Courts of Appeal when needed. The proposal aimed to allow additional court sessions beyond the regular schedule to handle caseloads.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 40", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2040%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_40_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2040%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 58, "fingerprint": "1914|CA36|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA36|Statewide", "content_hash": "c82d4ba52da771e4", "measure_id": "CA36", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Voting by Absent Electors", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.70000076, "percent_no": 62.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 57, "fingerprint": "1914|CA35|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA35|Statewide", "content_hash": "22618bbbf1ac7ec9", "measure_id": "CA35", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Eight Hour Law", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 33.5, "percent_no": 66.5, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 56, "fingerprint": "1914|CA34|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA34|Statewide", "content_hash": "7d106a92e003791e", "measure_id": "CA34", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 46", "description": "Drugless Practice", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 32.59999847, "percent_no": 67.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Health\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 46", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Healthcare & Welfare", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2046%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_46_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2046%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 55, "fingerprint": "1914|CA33|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA33|Statewide", "content_hash": "d22132954b94377c", "measure_id": "CA33", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Calling Convention for Revision of Constitution", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 28.89999962, "percent_no": 71.10000038, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have called a constitutional convention to revise Californ...", "summary_text": "This measure would have called a constitutional convention to revise California's state constitution. The convention would have had the authority to propose comprehensive changes to the existing constitutional framework.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 54, "fingerprint": "1914|CA32|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1914|CA32|Statewide", "content_hash": "b73c87dbb4cd919e", "measure_id": "CA32", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1914, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 24", "description": "Assembly Payroll Expenses", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 15.0, "percent_no": 85.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 24", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2024%201914", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_24_(1914)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2024%201914", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 53, "fingerprint": "1912|CA31|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1912|CA31|Statewide", "content_hash": "dfd836ccfe5c0881", "measure_id": "CA31", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1912, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Irrigation District Bonds", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 70.5, "percent_no": 29.5, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Agriculture | Bond Measures | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201912", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1912)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201912", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 52, "fingerprint": "1912|CA30|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1912|CA30|Statewide", "content_hash": "0b295584ae612c28", "measure_id": "CA30", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1912, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "Free School Textbooks", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 66.69999695, "percent_no": 33.30000305, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201912", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1912)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201912", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 51, "fingerprint": "1912|CA29|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1912|CA29|Statewide", "content_hash": "464f4ec870321611", "measure_id": "CA29", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1912, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Home Rule Taxation", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 41.0, "percent_no": 59.0, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201912", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1912)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201912", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 50, "fingerprint": "1912|CA28|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1912|CA28|Statewide", "content_hash": "3fd60a44897d862a", "measure_id": "CA28", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1912, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Consolidated City and County Governments", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 37.90000153, "percent_no": 62.09999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have allowed cities and counties in California to consolid...", "summary_text": "This measure would have allowed cities and counties in California to consolidate their separate governmental structures into unified city-county governments. The consolidation would have been permitted through local voter approval processes.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201912", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1912)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201912", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 49, "fingerprint": "1912|CA27|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1912|CA27|Statewide", "content_hash": "6ea2386810b5a851", "measure_id": "CA27", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1912, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Referendum Opposing an Act Creating the Office of Registrar of Voters -- Officers of a County", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.59999847, "percent_no": 63.40000153, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This referendum sought to repeal a recently enacted law that created the offi...", "summary_text": "This referendum sought to repeal a recently enacted law that created the office of registrar of voters as a county position. A \"yes\" vote would have eliminated this new county office, while a \"no\" vote allowed the registrar of voters position to remain in place.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201912", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1912)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201912", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 48, "fingerprint": "1912|CA26|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1912|CA26|Statewide", "content_hash": "1c19ecfc6036c6cf", "measure_id": "CA26", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1912, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Referendum Opposing an Act Creating the Office of Registrar of Voters -- Registrar of Voters, Salary and Duties", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 36.40000153, "percent_no": 63.59999847, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This referendum would have overturned a newly created act that established th...", "summary_text": "This referendum would have overturned a newly created act that established the office of Registrar of Voters and defined the position's salary and duties. A \"yes\" vote opposed the creation of this new voter registration office, while a \"no\" vote supported keeping the act in place.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201912", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1912)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201912", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 47, "fingerprint": "1912|CA25|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1912|CA25|Statewide", "content_hash": "fcb435310433f248", "measure_id": "CA25", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1912, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Referendum Opposing an Act the Office of Registrar of Voters -- Salaries and Fees in Counties of Third Class", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 34.70000076, "percent_no": 65.29999924, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Popular Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This referendum would have repealed an act that established salary and fee st...", "summary_text": "This referendum would have repealed an act that established salary and fee structures for registrars of voters in California's third-class counties. The measure failed, allowing the original legislation regarding registrar compensation to remain in effect.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201912", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1912)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201912", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 46, "fingerprint": "1912|CA24|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1912|CA24|Statewide", "content_hash": "a028514129ae7335", "measure_id": "CA24", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1912, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Racing Commission and Horse Racing", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": 29.79999924, "percent_no": 70.20000076, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Initiative\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Animal Rights/Hunting & Fishing | Gambling & Lotteries | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have established a state racing commission to regulate hor...", "summary_text": "This measure would have established a state racing commission to regulate horse racing and authorize pari-mutuel betting on horse races in California. The commission would have had authority to license racetracks, set rules for racing, and oversee betting operations.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Environment & Natural Resources", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201912", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1912)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201912", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 45, "fingerprint": "1911|CA23|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA23|Statewide", "content_hash": "b4368b4a1f7a931e", "measure_id": "CA23", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 9", "description": "Appeals in Criminal Cases.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Criminal Justice\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 9", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Public Safety & Crime", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%209%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%209%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 44, "fingerprint": "1911|CA22|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA22|Statewide", "content_hash": "4a1d6351e1950413", "measure_id": "CA22", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 11", "description": "Terms of Office.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 11", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2011%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_11_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2011%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 43, "fingerprint": "1911|CA21|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA21|Statewide", "content_hash": "784d0c2506992a15", "measure_id": "CA21", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 20", "description": "Supreme Court Officers. Clerk.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 20", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2020%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_20_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2020%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 42, "fingerprint": "1911|CA20|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA20|Statewide", "content_hash": "eda2eb35faffb376", "measure_id": "CA20", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 3", "description": "Sessions of the Legislature.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 3", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%203%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_3_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%203%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 41, "fingerprint": "1911|CA19|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA19|Statewide", "content_hash": "9f2bb65acadbfe2b", "measure_id": "CA19", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 5", "description": "Rights of Private Property, Law of Eminent Domain.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Land Use/Property Rights\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would have addressed the rights of private property owners and m...", "summary_text": "This measure would have addressed the rights of private property owners and modified California's laws regarding eminent domain, which is the government's power to take private property for public use. The specific changes to property rights and eminent domain procedures are not detailed in the provided ballot text.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 5", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Housing & Land Use", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%205%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_5_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%205%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 40, "fingerprint": "1911|CA18|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA18|Statewide", "content_hash": "15eb2eb2817a2676", "measure_id": "CA18", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 8", "description": "Recall by the Electors, of Public Officials.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would establish a process allowing voters to remove elected publ...", "summary_text": "This measure would establish a process allowing voters to remove elected public officials from office before their terms expire through a recall election.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 8", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%208%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_8_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%208%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 39, "fingerprint": "1911|CA17|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA17|Statewide", "content_hash": "267b03e04295aa47", "measure_id": "CA17", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 16", "description": "Railroad Commission.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 16", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2016%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2016%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 38, "fingerprint": "1911|CA16|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA16|Statewide", "content_hash": "b61a48f993136202", "measure_id": "CA16", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 12", "description": "Railroad Commission Power and Jurisdiction.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would grant the Railroad Commission expanded power and ju...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would grant the Railroad Commission expanded power and jurisdiction over railroad operations and regulation in California. The measure aimed to strengthen state oversight of railroad companies and their practices.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 12", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2012%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2012%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 37, "fingerprint": "1911|CA15|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA15|Statewide", "content_hash": "1733145aa4eee6f8", "measure_id": "CA15", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 14", "description": "Public Utilities.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Energy & Electric Utilities\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 14", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Utilities & Energy", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2014%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2014%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 36, "fingerprint": "1911|CA14|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA14|Statewide", "content_hash": "6d7769b75ee46bcf", "measure_id": "CA14", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 22", "description": "Property Tax Exemptions for Military Service.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Military & Veterans Affairs | Tax & Revenue\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would provide property tax exemptions for individuals who served...", "summary_text": "This measure would provide property tax exemptions for individuals who served in the military. The exemptions would reduce or eliminate property taxes on real estate owned by qualifying veterans.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 22", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2022%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2022%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 35, "fingerprint": "1911|CA13|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA13|Statewide", "content_hash": "4e151a8074a11dd5", "measure_id": "CA13", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 13", "description": "Powers Conferred on Municipal Corporations by Freeholders' Charters. Municipalities.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1911 California ballot measure would allow municipalities to adopt freeh...", "summary_text": "This 1911 California ballot measure would allow municipalities to adopt freeholders' charters that grant them broader powers of local self-governance. The measure expands the authority that cities and towns can exercise through locally-drafted charters rather than being limited to powers specifically granted by the state legislature.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 13", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2013%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_13_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2013%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 34, "fingerprint": "1911|CA12|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA12|Statewide", "content_hash": "4a5814c5cf56c4df", "measure_id": "CA12", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 19", "description": "Passes for Public Officials.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0State Government | Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 19", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2019%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_19_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2019%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 33, "fingerprint": "1911|CA11|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA11|Statewide", "content_hash": "52efece3a3213e17", "measure_id": "CA11", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 6", "description": "Municipal Charters.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 6", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%206%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_6_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%206%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 32, "fingerprint": "1911|CA10|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA10|Statewide", "content_hash": "4583e3a59188a07e", "measure_id": "CA10", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 15", "description": "Minimum Period for use of Textbooks in the Common Schools.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Education: PreK-12\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would establish a minimum period of time that textbooks must be ...", "summary_text": "This measure would establish a minimum period of time that textbooks must be used in California's common schools before they can be replaced. It aims to create standardized requirements for how long educational materials remain in use across the state's public school system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 15", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Education", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2015%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2015%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 31, "fingerprint": "1911|CA9|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA9|Statewide", "content_hash": "e054605f54ee3dd2", "measure_id": "CA9", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 1", "description": "Measurement and Graduation of Weights and Measures.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would establish standardized systems for measuring and graduatin...", "summary_text": "This measure would establish standardized systems for measuring and graduating weights and measures throughout California. It would create uniform standards for commercial and legal measurement practices across the state.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 1", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%201%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_1_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%201%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 30, "fingerprint": "1911|CA8|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA8|Statewide", "content_hash": "81f48d854cf8e809", "measure_id": "CA8", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 17", "description": "Manner of Electing Officers of Cities. Municipal Elections.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections | Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1911 California ballot measure would establish or modify procedures for ...", "summary_text": "This 1911 California ballot measure would establish or modify procedures for how municipal officers are elected in cities throughout the state. The measure addresses the electoral processes and requirements for city-level elections.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 17", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2017%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_17_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2017%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 29, "fingerprint": "1911|CA7|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA7|Statewide", "content_hash": "80776fdb6d2ad035", "measure_id": "CA7", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 18", "description": "Legislative Power to Establish Inferior Courts.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary | Legislatures\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would give the California Legislature the power to establ...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would give the California Legislature the power to establish inferior courts below the level of superior courts. It would expand the legislative authority to create additional levels of courts within the state's judicial system.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 18", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2018%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_18_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2018%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 28, "fingerprint": "1911|CA6|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA6|Statewide", "content_hash": "c4dcc685347996dc", "measure_id": "CA6", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 7", "description": "Initiative and Referendum.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Elections-Initiative Process\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 0, "summary_title": null, "summary_text": null, "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 7", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%207%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%207%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 27, "fingerprint": "1911|CA5|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA5|Statewide", "content_hash": "f5699ae332607d7c", "measure_id": "CA5", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 21", "description": "Impeachment of State Officers and Judges.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Judiciary | State Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This 1911 California ballot measure would have established procedures for the...", "summary_text": "This 1911 California ballot measure would have established procedures for the impeachment of state officers and judges. The measure would have created a formal process for removing elected officials and judicial officers from office for misconduct or other specified reasons.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 21", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2021%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2021%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 26, "fingerprint": "1911|CA4|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA4|Statewide", "content_hash": "388104301b4b5441", "measure_id": "CA4", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 2", "description": "County Charters, \"County Home Rule\".", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Local Government\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would allow counties in California to adopt their own charters a...", "summary_text": "This measure would allow counties in California to adopt their own charters and exercise local self-governance powers, similar to the home rule authority already granted to cities. It would enable counties to establish their own governmental structures and regulations within the framework of state law.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 2", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Government & Elections", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%202%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_2_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%202%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 25, "fingerprint": "1911|CA3|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA3|Statewide", "content_hash": "5f862eddc763175c", "measure_id": "CA3", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 10", "description": "Compensation for Industrial Accidents", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Business & Commerce | Insurance | Labor & Employment\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would establish a system for compensating workers injured...", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would establish a system for compensating workers injured in industrial accidents. It would create a framework for providing financial support to workers who suffer workplace injuries.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 17:50:43", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 0, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 10", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Business & Labor", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2010%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_10_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2010%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 24, "fingerprint": "1911|CA2|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA2|Statewide", "content_hash": "03a5464deb8fa429", "measure_id": "CA2", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 23", "description": "Common Carriers. Railroads and Other Transportation.", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 0, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Transportation\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This measure would give the state government regulatory authority over common...", "summary_text": "This measure would give the state government regulatory authority over common carriers, including railroads and other transportation companies. It would allow the state to set rates, establish service standards, and oversee operations of these transportation businesses.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 15:22:19.563958", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 1, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 23", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Transportation", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%2023%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_23_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%2023%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}, {"id": 23, "fingerprint": "1911|CA1|Statewide|ICPSR", "measure_fingerprint": "1911|CA1|Statewide", "content_hash": "62a3c2605bc07224", "measure_id": "CA1", "measure_letter": null, "year": 1911, "state": "CA", "county": "Statewide", "jurisdiction": null, "title": "Proposition 4", "description": "Rights of Suffrage (Permitting Women to Vote).", "ballot_question": null, "generated_title": null, "original_title": null, "yes_votes": null, "no_votes": null, "total_votes": null, "percent_yes": null, "percent_no": null, "passed": 1, "pass_fail": null, "vote_threshold": null, "measure_type": "\u00a0Legislative Referendum\u00a0", "topic_primary": "\u00a0Civil & Constitutional Law | Elections\u00a0", "topic_secondary": null, "category_type": null, "category_topic": null, "data_source": "ICPSR", "source_url": null, "pdf_url": null, "has_summary": 1, "summary_title": "This ballot measure would grant women the right to vote in California elections", "summary_text": "This ballot measure would grant women the right to vote in California elections. It would extend voting rights to female citizens on equal terms with male citizens.", "election_type": "general", "election_type_imputed": 0, "election_date": null, "decade": 1910, "century": 20, "created_at": "2025-07-30 17:16:01", "updated_at": "2026-04-12 15:22:19.544061", "last_seen_at": "2025-07-31 00:15:33", "update_count": 4, "is_active": 1, "is_duplicate": 0, "duplicate_type": null, "master_id": null, "merged_from": null, "related_measures": null, "relationship_type": null, "briefing_text": null, "fiscal_impact": null, "pro_arguments": null, "con_arguments": null, "proponents": null, "opponents": null, "endorsements": null, "research_status": null, "research_depth": null, "research_updated_at": null, "research_sources": null, "measure_text": "Proposition 4", "source": "ICPSR", "display_topic": "Civil Rights", "display_category_type": null, "external_links": [{"source": "UC Law SF", "url": "https://repository.uclawsf.edu/ca_ballot_props/?q=Proposition%204%201911", "confidence": "medium", "icon": "academic"}, {"source": "Ballotpedia", "url": "https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_4_(1911)", "confidence": "low", "icon": "ballot"}, {"source": "Wikipedia", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=California%20Proposition%204%201911", "confidence": "low", "icon": "wikipedia"}]}]